Skip to main content

Full text of "DEFEANSE INDUSTRY BULLETIN VOL2 NO1"

See other formats 


Volume 2 No. 1 



January 1966 



l\ 




ISTANT SECRETARY OF 
^[PUBLIC AFFAIRS 



IN THIS ISSUE 

riiunnhitf I'ulli'nis in Miumgcmunl Theory 

Tin! Nnvy'tt Apollo Minniou 

Thin in (II'MOIA 



>. ; 1 

_. __c o 

_ __ 9 

Announced for DOO-NSIA Advimccd 1'lnnning Hviflii|?s 14 

Index of DofciiHu Indnslry Bulletin for liMiS - 24 

DEPARTMENTS 

Admit PiMiph- - -- - ' 

('itlrntliir of ICvi'iilH 8 

M(M'(inj(H mid MyntpiiHia 1 

13 

IB 

20 



l''i'<nn Ilii 1 KjM'iikcr'H RoHtnim 



Defense Industry Bulletin Starts 
Second Year of Publication 




Tlu- Aral iiiinlvi'i-Biiry IHHUH f Urn DKFMNHK INDUSTKY BULLETIN 
ltmr | H mi.- on, hi our ccinlimiiiiff nffort tcj iimiinL Americnn imlujitry in 
4. d Im lo Huf..iiH.i wiulronHmts. ThoiiHmulB of rjjadtini. have told UHJl 
.' .JK" IScKl mn.os. I an. phuiHiHl with tiiiB oxpi-CHBlon of intcreHt and with 
tin; uti'iidy Ki'owth in UHJ HUIJ-KTIN ciraulnUon. 

|)ul)liruLion and thr channolfi of inPormiition, we wluill I do 
! Lo w.mmunU-iito (mr imlicies and plnnn iind Jenny industry 



them. 
incrwwinff cooperation between tho Dopartmont of 

rassa 




Secretary of Defenae 



Procurement counseling and assistance will be offered for those 
who 'desire it as part of the 1966 DOD-National Security Industrial 
Association Advanced Planning Briefings for Industry. Senior pro- 
curement specialists from the Military Departments and the 
Defense Contract Administration Service will be on hand at eacn 
regional meeting to discuss specific procurement program interests 
and problems. , 

Also available will be current Invitations For Bid and Requests 
For Proposal aggregating over $100 million, as well as lists oi 
items for which DOD buyers are seeking additional sources. Other 
informative material on hand will be Secretary of Defense Mc- 
Namara's "Posture Statement" before the House Armed Services 
Committee on the FY 1967-1971 Defense Program and the 1967 
Defense Budget. Special attention will be given, to small business 
and labor surplus area concerns and the six DOD programs for 
those firms will be explained. 

Joining the Defense Department will be representatives of prime 
defense contractors, the Department of Commerce and the Small 
Business Administration, who will be available to discuss sub- 
contracting opportunities and services available to contractors in 
the technical, management, financial and dissemination of require- 
rn PTI i^ fi P! n *3 

The 1966 Advanced Planning Briefings for Industry will bo held 
in the following metropolitan areas on the dates indicated: 

March 3-4 Sheraton-Boston Hotel, Boston, Mass. 

March 9-10 Didder Plaza Hotel, Atlanta, Ga. 

March 16-17 Sheraton-Jefferson Hotel, St. Louis, Mo. 

April 12-13 Fairmont Hotel, San Francisco, Calif. 

April 27-28 Sheraton-Park Hotel, Washington, D.C. 

Those interested in attending the briefings may obtain additional 

formation by contacting Mr, Paul Newman, National Security 

idustrial Association, 1035 Fifteenth Street N.W., Washington, 

.C. 



ion 



in 

From time to time contractors have expressed a reluctance to 
lestion classification guidance received with a proposal or a con- 
act, or to request elaborations and explanations for fear of an- 
,gonizing the "customer." Proper classification is the touchstone 
: security. To ensure integrity of the system and to reduce security 
ists to a minimum, it is essential for the contractor to bo able 
i identify precisely and accurately the items of information which 
:quire classification so as to figure out what documents and hard- 
are must be classified. 

Contractors must rely on the guidance set forth in DD Form 
54, "Security Requirements Check List," or on other guidance re- 
lived from the contracting office. When the guidance is not fuifli- 
ently detailed or clear, the contractor should take steps to obtain 
arification, 

Overclassification and misclassiflcation can be expensive. In ac- 
>rdance with policy established by the Director for Classification 
[anagement. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Ad- 
linistration), contracting officers are responsible for assisting 
Detractors in elaborating, interpreting and applying classification 
uidance. As a slogan, the Director for Classification Management 
nggests, "When in doubt find out I" 




I'ubliHhcd by the Department 
of Defense 

Hon. Robert S. McNumnru 

Secretary of Defimm 

Hon. CyniH R. Vance 

Deputy Secretary of Defeiitit 

Hun, Arthur Sylvester 

AHHlstunt Secretary of Defoiist 
(Public AffairH) 

Col. J. H. CFOHH, USAF 

Director for Community Itcliitluiif 

Col. Kdwin C. (Jilmon, UHA 

Chief, HuHineHH & Labor Divinloj 



Keillor LCilr. K W. Bradford, U8N 

ANHOC. 1'lditor Miss Cocillu Pollol 

AHHOC. I'Mitor Mr. Rick La Falci 

Editorial AHHtalant 

Norman E. Worm, J01, USB 



Tho Dufvntw iwlunt.rii linllntu 
in published monthly by ttin UusimHfi 
& Labor Division, Directorate foi 
Community RolatioiiH, Olllcn (if tin 
Assistant Heerotary of Defense (1'ub 
lie A(l'alrfl). UHO of r.umln Tor itrinliiif 
ihiH publieutlon wan npproviiu liy tlu 
Director oC tho Iluretui if thi) UiidKfll 

Tlui purpoHO of tho Hullt'.tin Hi 
to Horvo IIH u mount* of nonimiinluiillot 
hntwiinn thn DnpUTlnusnt <f DHfiinsi 
(DOD) mid (tin imthoriwid aKtidei 
ntid dofntiHO eontractot'H mid othtu 

iHlHilHiHH IlltOTOHtH, It Will HOCVO HI 

K"i'li> to imlufttry conc.nrniiiK 



einl poliiilfm, proKi'iiniH and 

and will H<!oU to Htimuluto tlioiiKht >; 

iiutinlxirH of this d<!f<!iiH<V'induntry lean 

hi HolvinR thn probleniH thul may nrifli 

in fulfilling tmi rcqiilroniontfl of tli 

DOD. 

MaleriiU in tho Jittllotin In 6C 
l((ct(!(l to Hiipiily piU'Linont iincltumiftn 
data of intorcHt tn tho buHlntiHH com 
imintty, SuK(?Htion from induHlr] 
nipnifi(snttitiv(!H for topics to b cov 
ored In futuro (HBUOS Hhould ho for 
wiirdrd to thfl lUmlnoHH &. Label 
DiviHlon. 

Th<! Itullvtin is (llstrilMitc.d end 
month to thn tigonetoH of DoparUnom 
of Dofonso, Army, Nuvy, and All 
Force, and to roproflonttitlvoa of ImtuJ 
try, 'HtMiuoflt for copies whould bo eid 
droHHCid to tho HuHlnenH & Lnlxx 
Division, OASD/PA, Room 2K811 
Tho Vdiitiiffon, WaHhingloii. O.C 
20OI, tolophone, OX ford fi-2700. 

CoiiUmtH of tho muRaxino may li 
rojirintfld freely without requestiin 
pormlBsion, Mention of tho aourco wE 
bo uppreclatcd, 




The advancement of technology in 
all phases of industrial and military 
management since World War II has 
forced radical innovation in manage- 
ment theory awl practice. In the De- 
partment of Defense the acquisition 
and development of weaponry has be- 
come a management problem of extra- 
ordinary proportions. Changing roles 
and missions of the military establish- 
ment and the increasing acceleration 
in the conception and development of 
weaponry have fostered the creation of 
unique and challenging approaches to 
the management process, approaches 
which cut across the neatly defined 
road maps of management theory. 
Similar and equally radical changes 
have occurred in the defense industry. 
There has been a tendency in the de- 
velopment of this approach for 
writers and practitioners to support 
their own ideas by downgrading or 
misrepresenting what others have con- 
tributed. The result has been some 
confusion regarding the management 
discipline. 

This article will critically analyze 
the so-called "qualitative" "quanti- 
tative" dichotomy that has evolved in 
management thought a?id theory in 
recent years. The analysis will be per- 
formed in the context of the manage- 
ment roles involved in the develop- 
ment, acquisition and employment of 



a 

8 

fl 

rf 
5 




Maj. David I. Cleland, USAF, is an 
Associate Professor of Management 
rat the Air Force Institute of Technol- 
ogy. Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. He 
teaches Management Theory, Corpora- 
tion Finance and Systems Manage- 
ment. Maj. Cleland is a graduate of 
the University of Pittsburgh and holds 
a Ph.D. degree in Industrial Manage- 
ment from Ohio State University. 



Maj. David I. Cleland, USAF 
Maj. David C. Dellinger, USAF 

weaponry. 1 A brief resume of histori- 
cal and contemporary man agament 
thought will serve as a conceptual 
foundation, even though such a foun- 
dation can only be offered at the risk 
of severe oversimplification of a com- 
plex subject. 

The Evolution of a Management 
Discipline. 

Within this century there has de- 
veloped in the United States a thriv- 
ing economy, fostered by a dynamic 
revolution in technology and manage- 
ment thought. The professional man- 
ager has influenced all sectors of our 
society by providing skill in the man- 
agement of human and non-human 
resources. Problems have confronted 
military and industrial leaders since 
antiquity, and various techniques of 
management have existed since the 
beginning of man's efforts to form or- 
ganized groups for attaining mutual 
objectives. The systematic examina- 
tion of management thought, and the 
development of a discipline devoted to 
codifying principles and developing a 
theory has been, for the most part, a 
product of the twentieth century. 
Management has long been recognized 
as an art, but only in the present 
century has scholarly interest devel- 
oped in the designing of a conceptual 
framework for the teaching and prac- 
tice of management. 

The conceptualization of manage- 
ment theory in its modem meaning 
has a firm reference in the writings of 
industrialist Frederick W. Taylor 
early in the present century. Taylor's 
classic treatment about management 
as "knowing exactly what you want 
men to do, and then seeing that they 
do it in the best and cheapest way" 
introduced an era of scientific man- 
agement at the shop level. Taylor was 
mainly concerned with the efficiency 
of workers and managers in actual 
production positions in the factory. 
This preoccupation at the operating 
level probably caused practitioners 
and scholars to neglect the problems 
of management at higher levels in the 
organizational structure. Koontz and 
O'Donnell at the Graduate School of 
Business Administration, University 

1 Weaponry/ has an identifiable life 
cycle, viz., four phases : conceptual, 
definition, acquisition- and operations. 
This life cycle begins with an idea, or 
concept, progresses through definition 
and production and ends when the 
weapon or system is retired from the 
operational inventory of the Military 
Department. 



of California, Los Angeles, credit 
Henri Fayol, a French industrialist 
with being the father of modern man- 
agement theory. Fayol's now classic 
book, "Administration Industrielle et 
Generate," published in 1916, waa not 
translated into English until 1929; no 
English translation was published in 
the United States until around 1949." 
Fayol's book presented a clear and 
perspective view of the management 
process. His examination and treat- 
ment of the organic functions of man- 
agement are, in the main, still valid 
several decades later, Others have 
made contributions to the development 
of management principles and theory; 
yet the work of Taylor and Fayol 
remain as "classics" in the annals of 
management thought and theory. 

The Meaning of Management, 

Management is a distinct process or 
activity concerned with the achieve- 
ment of objectives. It may be expressed 
in a number of different ways, viz., 
". . . the task of creating the internal 
environment for organized effort to 
accompl i sh group goal s. In coordi- 
nating group activity, the manager 
plans, organizeis, staffs, directs and 

' Koontu, Harold and O'Donnel, 
Cyril "Principles of Management," 
(McGraw-Hill Book Company, 
p. 17. 




Maj. David C. Dellinger, USAF^ia 
an Associate Professor of Statistics 
and Operations Research at the Air 
Force Institute of Technology, Wright- 
Patterson AFB, Ohio. Maj. Dellinger 
is a graduate of Duke University and 
holds n Ph.D. in Operations Research 
and a Master's degree hi Industrial 
Engineering, both from Stanford Uni- 
versity. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



1 



controls." 3 Ralph C. Davis of the 
Ohio State University defines manage- 
ment as ". . . the function of execu- 
tive leadership anywhere."" Ihe 
USAF defines management as the 
process of organizing and u sing _ re- 
sources to accomplish predetermined 
objectives. Other definitions of man- 
agement express fundamentally the 
same thought as reflected above. 
Throughout most definitions of man- 
agement one finds certain universal 
elements, viz., 

Management is a distinct pro- 
cess dealing with group activity. 

An objective 1 is. involved. 

The objectives are achieved 
through establishing salient relation- 
ships between human and non-hu- 
man resources. 

Management necessitates that 
the manager relinquish the tendency 
to perform things for himself and 
accomplish objectives through work- 
ing with others in the group situa- 
tion. 

o Decision making is pervasive in 
the management process. 

Analysis of these elements indi- 
cates that considerable agreement 
exists concerning the functions and 
nature of the management process. 
This indicates a sense of maturing 
in the discipline with promise of the 
development of a scientifically based 
philosophy of management. The dis- 
quieting force in management theory 
today is the variety of approaches 
which are appearing from parochial 
areas. There are tendencies to form- 
ulate distinct approaches to man- 
agement thereby neglecting the 
inter-disciplinary nature of the man- 
agement process. The various 
approaches or "schools" of manage- 
ment theory include: 

The Traditional School. Founded by 
Henri Fayol, this approach high- 
lights the management process of 
getting things done through people 
in organized groups. By analyzing 
the management process and identi- 
fying the underlying principles, a 
theory of management is formulated. 
Management is viewed as a univer- 
sal activity by this group with the 
principles thereof holding true 
whether the group be a business, 

3 Ibid, p. 1. 

* Davis, Ralph C. r "The Fundamen- 
tals of Top Management" (Harper & 
Bros., Publishers, New York, 1951), 
p. 6. 

s Air Force Manual 25-1 1 Oct. 15, 
1964, P. %> 

" Several authors have described the 
schools of management theory. The 
article, "Making Seme of Manage- 
ment Theory," by Harold Koontz, 
Harvard Business Review (.July- 
August 1SG2~), is a primary source 
of material for the ensuing discussion 
of the "schools" of management. How- 
ever, responsibility for the addition of 
the systems school in the present 
article belongs to the authors, 



government, military, or other _ or- 
ganization. This school deals princi- 
pally with the organization aspect 
of the management process, although 
in later years the management func- 
tions were analyzed and dissected. 
Scholars in this field have some dis- 
agreement concerning the various 
organic functions of the manager; 
however, there is nearly complete 
agreement that planning, organizing 
and- controlling are the primary 
functions of the manager. The tra- 
ditional school centers around these 
ideas: 

Organizations function as an 
integrated entity on a vertical basis. 

A strong superior-subordinate 
relationship is required to preserve 
unity of command and to ensure 
unanimity of objective. 

Individual functional managers 
are parochial (and rightly so). 

Functional managers maintain 
lateral staff coordination to obtain 
integrated staff action. 

Organizational groups have a 
basic dichotomy, viz,, the line and 
the staff. 

A scalar chain of authority 
relationships exist within the organ- 
ization ranging from the ultimate 
authority to the lowest rank with 
the line of authority following every 
link in the chain. 

An employee should receive 
orders from one superior only, 

Work progresses among relatively 
autonomous functional units of an 
organization. 

Human Behavior School. During the 
early days of the founding of the 
management discipline, primary em- 
phasis centered around scientific 
management at the shop level. The 
employee was viewed as an instru- 
ment of employment to be utilized 
as efficiently as possible in produc- 
tion. The scientific selection and 
training of workmen, the establish- 
ment of optimum work quotas and 
the neglect of the human element of 
management caused a revisionist 
movement in the period following 
the 1929 depression. This movement 
revolutionized management thinking 
by focusing attention on the ele- 
ments of job and work satisfaction 
as related to the human relations 
part of employment. As described 
by Keith Davis, Professor of Man- 
agement, Arizona State University, 
". . . human relations is the inte- 
gration of people into a work sit- 
uation that motivates them to work 
together productively, cooperatively 
and with economic, psychological and 
social satisfactions." 7 The human 
behavioral view of management 
places heavy emphasis on the inter- 
personal relations that exist in the 
management situation and is heavily 
oriented in the theories presented by 
the psychologists and sociologists. 
Perhaps more so than the traditional 

''Davis, Keith, "Human Relations at 
Work," (McGraw-Hill Book Co., /wo., 
1062), p. 4- 



school, this approach is based on the 
thesis that managing is getting 
things done through people with the 
primary focus resting in the moti- 
vating function of management. 

The Mathematical School (some- 
times called "quantitative" manage- 
ment). This school includes those 
theorists who emphasize the use of 
mathematical models in managerial 
decision making. The best Jcnown 
group comprising this school include 
the operations researchers and man- 
agement scientists who emphasise 
quantitative analysis in decision 
making. This group supports the 
idea that the essence of management 
is decision making, a process which 
can be expressed in terms of mathe- 
matical symbols and relationships. 
Mathematics then logically has a 
place in management through tho 
requirement for objectivity and ab- 
stract reasoning. To label this school 
mathematical, however, is actually a 
misnomer as indicated in Professor 
Koontz's observation that: 

"There can be no doubt of the 
great usefulness of mathematical 
approaches to any field of inquiry. 
This type of approach forces upon 
the analyst the definition of a 
problem or problem area ; con- 
veniently logical methodology- 
developed by years of scientific 
application and abstraction fur- 
nishes a powerful tool for solving - 
or simplifying complex phe- '- 
nomena. But it is even harder to 
see mathematics as a truly sepa- 
rate school of management theory 
than it is to see it as a separata 
school in physics, chemistry, engi- 
neering, or medicine." 8 

Even though one could hardly 
argue that the mathematical ap- 
proach constitutes a form of man- 
agement, quantitative analysis prop- 
erly occupies a strong position i n 
the management process. 

The Systems Approach. This most 
recent school opines that traditional 
management philosophy is pervnded ^ 
with vertical flow of authority nnd \ 
responsibility relationships and em- 
phasizes parts and segments of the 
organization. According to the ays- 
terns school the traditional approach 
does not place sufficient import on 
the inter-relationships and integra- 
tion of activities involved in the total 
array of components of the man- 
agement system. The systems con- 
cept provides a way of thinking 
about the management process. It 
presents a theoretical framework for 
viewing the internal and external 
environmental factors as integrated 
into the whole. Explicit in this con- 
cept is the interdependency of de- ; 
cisions between all parts of ccm- i 
ponents of the management problem- 
Such awareness of the system inter- 

s Harold Koontz, piJ. 35-36, 

January 1966 



dependency discourages provincial 
decisions. 

Each of the schools have their 
place in any management situation 
but vary in emphasis depending 
upon the particular environmental 
conditions that are encountered. One 
f the most provocative areas of 
management is that of developing 
a_ modern weapon system. In this en- 
vironment is found the project man- 
ager* (or systems manager), a man- 
ager that is confronted with a 
unique set of circumstances and 
forces that channel his thought and 
behavior into somewhat singular 
patterns of response. 

Today's project manager is facing 
an _ interlaced sequential managerial 
activity encompassing broad spec- 
trui-ns of authority and responsibil- 
ity. The complexity of management 
relationships cause vast resources to 
be exhausted before retrenchment or 
redirection can be effected. 

Change has become a normal way 
of life and the increase in the rate 
of change has vastly complicated 
the manager's decision problems. 
The number of alternatives which 
arc open for consideration in the 
selection of weaponry have increased 
at a phenomenal rate and the con- 
sequences of error have become pi'O- 
founcHy serious. 

Experience alone has proven inad- 
equate for coping with these rapid 
changes; managers have been forced 
to develop better methods for mak- 
ing and executing decisions. The 
development of electronic computers 
has made it possible to rapidly pro- 
cess and manipulate large quantities 
of data and has made it feasible to 
conduct quantitative analysis hereto- 
fore impractical. The introduction of 
quantitative analysis into manage- 
ment processes has manifestly 
changed the way we think about 
the management task. Managers in 
industry and Government are begin- 
ning 1 to recognize the tremendous 
potential of the computer and the 
quantitative tools of the operations 
research as aids in the decision pro- 
cess. 

There is some evidence to indicate 
that a cleavage has developed be- 
tween those who belong to the earlier 
mentioned Mathematical School and 
the other schools of management, pri- 
marily the Traditional School. The 
terms qualitative and quantitative 
managements have been used to indi- 
cate these two schools. It is the thesis 

* Note: Tko -project manager is an 
extraordinary individual in the De- 
fense industry establishment; he may 
niinply 1)0 defined as that individual 
ivlio is appointed to accomplish the 
task of inteffratinff functional and 
esptra-orffanizational efforts directed 
toward the development and acpuiai- 
tiow- of weaponry. For a discussion^ of 
the t'olc and mission see "The Project 
Manaffor Manaaer Extraordinary," 
Defense Industry Bulletin (May 
19G5}. 



of this article that a view of manage- 
ment which does not combine the con- 
tributions of these two schools in the 
management process is erroneous. One 
does not have the simple alternative 
of being either a qualitative manager 
or a quantitative manager. To formu- 
late a philosophy of management on 
this basis can easily lead to the un- 
fortunate impression that the ques- 
tion is one of utilizing either quan- 
titative analysis or qualitative 
analysis in the management func- 
tion. Such is not the case. The dif- 
ference which should be emphasized 
is neither one of methodology nor 
point of view, but rather the partic- 
ular aspects of the managerial prob- 
lems and the degree of analysis 
essential to the management task. 

The manager's job can be viewed 
as a two-step process; (1) deciding 
what should be done and (2) assur- 
ing that actions are taken to effect 
the decision. For convenience, these 
steps can be designated the decision 
process and the execution process, 
respectively. It is quite clear that 
the manager must assume responsi- 
bility for both these processes. To 
perform only one would accomplish 
something less than the total man- 
agement job required. The portion 
of the total management job compris- 
ing each of these processes varies with 
the job. In large highly centralized 
organizations, lower level managers 
are not given authority to make 
major decisions; their jobs are pri- 
marily concerned with execution. 
Their decisions are likely to be such 
that little analysis is required; ex- 
perience and policy direction provide 
an adequate guide to decision mak- 
ing. Conversely, higher level execu- 
tives in large organizations depend 
upon an administrative apparatus 
for the execution process and con- 
centrate their attention on long-range 
planning and on critical and compre- 
hensive decisions. Experience itself 
is often an inadequate basis for de- 
cision making on the level ; the 
process must be supplemented with 
analysis. Perhaps a better way of 
saying it is that experience and 
judgment must be integrated into 
an analytical framework to comple- 
ment the decision-making process. 

The Mathematical School or quanti- 
tative managers concern themselves 
with analysis for decision malting al- 
most entirely. They emphasize the 
use of a formal analysis and the use 
of computer technology, mathematical 
models and related techniques in the 
decision process. Members of the tradi- 
tional or qualitative school address 
themselves to the entire management 
problem, i.e., both the decision process 
and the execution process, but empha- 
size the execution process, possibly to 
the neglect of the decision process. 

Decision making has been an in- 
tegral element of management lit- 
erature appearing in the first half 
of this century; increased momen- 
tum in decision theory in the last 20 



years has centered around the emer- 
gence of adaptable and sophisticated 
tools of mathematics and statistics. 
The most vital decisions are non- 
recurring; Peter Dmcker has ex- 
plained these vital decisions in this 
manner: 

"The important decisions, the de- 
cisions that really matter, are 
strategic. They involve either 
finding out what the situation is, 
or changing it, either finding out 
what the resources are or what 
they should be. These are the 
specifically managerial decisions. 
Anyone who is a manager has to 
make such strategic decisions, and 
the higher his level in the man- 
agement hierarchy, the more of 
them he must make."" 

Strategic decisions are unique as 
compared to routine decisions through 
the involvement of forces of (1) high 
degree of risk and uncertainty; (2) 
critical elements of futurity; (3) 
heavy committment of human and 
non-human resources; and (4) mani- 
festly affecting the organization's 
competitive position. 

Traditional theory has,_ in the main, 
approached decision making from the 
basis of five distinct phases: 

Defining the problem. 
" Analyzing the problem. 

Developing alternate solutions. 

Deciding on the best solution. 
Converting the decision into effec- 
tive action. 

Each phase of the foregoing has 
several steps. What traditional theory 
has failed to do is provide a rigorous 
definition of framework for analysis, 
to establish criteria to assess un- 
knowns and to require the logic and 
methodology of mathematics. 

A philosophy of management which 
considers quantitative and qualitative 
as two separate and distinct forms 
of management not only is erroneous 
and misleading but indicates a serious 
misunderstanding of the management 
process. To say that the quantitative 
manager considers only the quantita- 
tive aspects of management problems 
and that the qualitative manager 
evaluates "just qualitative aspects of 
management is illogical. Management 
problems just don't come with their 
salient issues neatly divided in this 
manner; any aspect can be treated 
(perhaps inadequately) from either 
quantitative or qualitative methodol- 
ogy. The very essence of the man- 
agerial decision process is that of 
determining how to treat the various 
aspects of the problem and what in- 
terrelations exist between them. If 
there is a meaningful issue between 
these schools, it is the question of 
the depth of analyais and methodol- 
ogy required for adequate decision 
waking. Traditional management 

*Drucker, Peter F., "Practice of 
Management," (Harper & Bros,, Pub- 
lishers, New York, 1954). 



Industry Bulletin 



theory has not emphasized analyais 
to the depth which am bo realized 
through the ma of inatfuimutwul 
logic. While traditional tit ear]/ duos 
advocate analynia, it in an anali/ttitt 
which is based largely on f-xjic-rienci'. 
gained in similar situations. 

.This is quite different from the 
view of analysis which a quantitutiim 
manager would take. As will be dis- 
cussed subsequently, he would advo- 
cate a tailored analytical structure 
for each decision and the use of any 
of a number of techniques as applic- 
able to the particular problem. Tra- 
ditional management theory had its 
roots in a time period whoii the rate 
of change in the environment was 
relatively low compared to contemp- 
orary and recent past times, when it 
was not practical to emphasis ana- 
lysis in depth for decision making. 
1 lie theory of analysis was not devel- 
oped to the extent that non-mathema- 
ticians could_ apply it, nor were com- 
puters available to economlcnlly 
process the immense amount of data 
sometimes required to make analysis 
m depth feasible. Moreover, the deci- 
sion problems did not generally re- 
quire the dcntli of analysis. ftxncrl- 
fince alone did provide (in adequate 
basis for more discussion. Thin ia not 
the case today and the industrial- Do- 
iense manage!' must develop a philo- 
sophy to keep pace with the challenge 
of contemporary management prob- 



knowledge nud skilhi apurl from tYrh 
ninil Hkillti mu'h nil erijtiiu'eriiiK. u<' 
counting, production, proi-nn-mm! 
and the. many oilier iikillii found | n 
complex oi-Kiihl7iitiiiii!i. Today's; nnui 
ager should be vitally rom'enied with 
I'OllI inning Hie development of an 
underlying (henry nr philosophy nf 
nnumgornent in order In provide i\ 
broad framework for the innliini; mid 
execution of dt'eminn In the complex 
niililary-indiiiilrmi environment. Tin* 
e.nnimilom' nf tra<li(ionul nmmif.'.- 
menl, theory in prlnciplni; |}ie::r fund 
ami'iital innxiinu ['\plaiu reri:mi phe 
noinenn ami enimlilufe HH< t'nunew.n l> 
around whirli a theory in built. :;>,. 

of tilled principle!' are cm.ily ivniir 
nixed through the oluiri vaflnii ,-f mm; 

ageillent experience, wlijj,. nllietjf an- 
"Mil in (ln< Hlale .(' nil liviiMilx-.J!), 
ivquirinK vcrillnUiun mid fo.liih-ntl.ui! 



(,f, 



i'i; n principle In .Ibuvjr.inlrit j, t 
tire, Kor example, the )ui.,i v riitu- 
pdint to dual Milmj.liinitioii in m, 
mid eonie to tin- ,] i,<u 
I'rnin I'oiH'liuiion (hut theie in m , (, 
Hlaiice or valirlitv in tin- pint. i|.!, ; ( 
unity of command."' 

Knnrlliiimof Hie MHIHIHIT. 



In the following sections, tradi- 

iif ImuiaKc . mcnt $ m \'y w in> its 

icceiit innovations is discussed to 
illustrate the emphasis on the execu- 
tion process and the views of th 
mathematical nchool are portrayed to 
illustrate its emphasis on the decision- 
making process. Finally, the two a - 
proaches arc combined to ' " ' 
intordopondency of both 
in the total management Job! 
Looking at the traditional frame- 

wha ll 1 !'?^ 011101 , 11 ' fl ftllt " tl't 
What the manager dnoa is fundanioii- 

In its application 



-. r,.^ 

i iHiUnirl nkill npnn. f lMMl ,) (. vh 
,' 11 ', lli ' 11 " invohvd in nn m^nm-,. 
Mini. It l.'i .<IIIUHIJH-,| ,,f |,|.-nimiil.|. 
uncltonii nr ||.imMK'iuiii 
"' at '''''' Inlt'Kntl l.t Hi. 
mKvim. Whil- , 

.^7" HI 'Tf niri ""i '"".(.mum,,, 
11 1 Praelilioner., at.nn.lm.l .-vt.f.-u, - 
lll 1 ' 1 " Hiat a manaK-r iuv.,- 
Ill" ilninitH i' iiml 



f 
"I 



in 



1 

)"' '"""' itH.iri 
iitvulvi-n lti<' tlri.-i- 

.-*. r whwi F,tt..M),| 
' 






All 

their level in an 
m certain basic 
ward thoaccomp- 



of an art and 



Management is diatinct field of 







ity, fixed price contracts were 
awarded by BUSHIPS in September 
1964 for the insertion/injection ships 
and in March 1965 for 'the reentry 
ships, 

Thus, three "Mission Class" tankers 
from the Maritime Administration 
reserve fleets are being converted by 
General Dynamics/Electronics at the 
General Dynamics/ Electric Boat ship- 
yard in Quiney, Mass. These con- 
versions include jumboization of the 
hulls, reactivation and repair of 
machinery plants and installation of 
technicians' quarters and instrumen- 
tation facilities in the new mid-bodies 
along with three lounges, a physical 
training room, workshops, a hobby 
shop and a library. There also are 
storage facilities for repair parts and 
equipment, conference rooms, briefing 
rooms, offices, photographic labora- 
tories and all the normal hotel facili- 
ties .essential to the mission. 

Originally named Mission San Fer- 
nando, Mission San Juan and Mis- 
sion De Pala, the ships will be re- 
named USNS Vanguard, USNS Red- 
stone and USNS Mercury, respec- 
tively, after United States space pro- 
grams, and bear T-AGM-19, T-AGM- 
20 and T-AGM-21 hull numbers. 

The first ship. Vanguard, was 
floated from its building dock on Sep- 
tember 9, 19CB. It should have trials 
by the Navy's Board of Inspection and 
Survey in February 1066 and com- 
plete instrumentation tests by mid- 
June. Redstone and Mercury will fol- 
low at throe-month intervals. 

Two existing range instrumentation 
ships, USNS Watortown (T-AGM-G) 
and USNS Huntsyille (T-AGM-7), 
were converted originally from Vic- 
tory ships and tire being modified to 
reentry ships by Ling-Temco-Vought's 
Range Systems Division at Avondale 
Shipyard in New Orleans, La. 

Instrumentation installations and 



mission support capabilities of the 15 
other range instrumentation ships 
vary considerably among the ships. 
When modification of a ship is re- 
quired to meet operational needs, the 
project office coordinates translation 
of the outline requirements provided 
by the range into the detail specifi- 
cations, contract plans and contract 
guidance plans needed for a competi- 
tive, fixed price procurement. Com- 
pared to the five Apollo instrumen- 
tation ships, work scope is much less 
on this type of project, but all ele- 
ments of the pre- procurement cycle 
are present. 

While the focus of liaison and Navy 
endeavor relating to a specific ship 
project is ISPO's project engineer, 
under the project manager, the proj- 
ect office has neither the manpower 
nor the versatility to produce the de- 
sign package, perform the contract- 
ing function, monitor contractor per- 
formance, or accomplish the profusion 
of other tasks required for successful 
ship delivery. The wide experience in 
shipbuilding and diverse talents _of 
the existing functional organization 
of BUSHIPS and its field activities 
are utilized, each element contributing 
its part to the whole in accordance 
with traditional shipbuilding practice. 
In addition, important contributions 
to the design package are made by 
instrumentation engineers of the Pac- 
ific Missile Range, a field activity of 
the Bureau of Naval Weapons. 

Employment of existing elements of 
the Naval Material Support Estab- 
lishment (NMSE) to fulfill the mis- 
sion of the Instrumentation Ships 
Project was specified in the project 
charter. The spirited cooperation, 
technical excellence and prompt re- 
sponse to ISPO tasks by personnel of 
these diverse organizations are re- 
sponsible for the success of this Chief 
of Naval Material Designated Project, 




Main Battle Tank 
Contract Awarded 

The U.S. Army signed a $43,728,000 
contract with General Motors Corp-, 
of Indianapolis, Intl., Dec. 16, for the 
completion of development work on 
the United States/Federal Republic 
of Germany Main Battle Tank Pro- 
gram (MET). 

Negotiations leading to the current 
contract were based on design, con- 
figuration and major component selec- 
tion decisions announced last June by 
the defense heads of both countries. 

This successful contracting effort 
guarantees unniternipted progress for 
the new Main Battle Tank and marks 
a major milestone in the life of this 
unique, Intel-national development 
effort. 

The contract provides for $11.7 mil- 
lion of the award to go to two sub- 
contractors: Continental Aviation & 
Engineering Corp., Detroit, Mich,, for 
a high horse power engine; and Na- 
tional Waterhf t Corp. , Kalamaz oo , 
Mich., for a new type suspension 
system. 

General Motors was selected as th< 
American contractor in July 1964 and 
to date, has completed its contributioi 
to the initial phases of the MBT pro- 
gram. The current contract cover; 
Phase III, which terminates with th< 
fabrication of pilot models as provide ( 
under the basic agreement between tUi 
United States and the Federal lie 
public of Germany signed Aug. 1, 1963 



Drawing of the Range Instrumentation Ship USNS Watertown. Originally 
converted from a Victory ship, the new vessel is being modified to support the 

TI.S.'s Apollo mission. 



ICAF Renames 
Correspondence Course 

The Industrial College of the Anne 
Forces correspondence course has 
new name "National Security Ma? 
agement." Effective Dec. 1, 19G5, til 
old title of "The Economics of ISTs 
tional Security" was dropped and t"h 
new one adopted. 

The new title is considered men 
descriptive of the material present e 
and reflects more vividly the intent < 
the course, which is to create a bett< 
understanding of the manager!; 
aspects of national security. 

The Industrial College is also uncle 
taking a major revision of the coui-i 
to bring it in line with resident cour! 
revisions. This will proceed on a co: 
tinning basis over several years ELI 
will result in the introducton of 
number of new texts and revision 
the remainder. 

Change in the name of the cour 
or planned revisions will not alter t! 
present system of awarding retenti 
and retirement points to reservists; 
Inquiries about the correspond on 
course should be addressed to t 
Commandant, Industrial College 
the Armed Forces, ATTN: COM 
spondence School, Fort Lesley J, IV 
Nair, Washington, D,C. 



January 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Dr. James M. Bridges, Special Asst. 
for Command and Control to the Dir., 
Defense Research & Engineering, re- 
tired on Doc. 30, 1965. 

Jack L, Stempler has been ap- 
pointed Asst. to the Secretary of De- 
fense (Legislative Affairs). He re- 
places David E. McGiffert, who was 
sworn in as Under Secretary of the 
Army on Nov. 30. 

The Advanced Research Projects 
Agency has selected Maj Gen. Charles 
J. Thames, USA, to succeed retiring 
Mnj. Gen. K. H. Wiencche, USA, as 
Dir., Remote Area Conflict (Project 
AGILE). 

KAdm. Ira P. Haddock, SC, USN, 
former Asst. Chief of the Bureau 
of Supply & Accounts for Supply 
Management, Department of the 
Navy, has become Commander, De- 
fense Construction Supply Center, 
Columbus, Ohio. He succeeds Brig. 
Gen. Robert H. Herman, USAF, who 
hns retired. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Maj. Gen. Donald V. Bennett suc- 
ceeds LI. Gen. James B. Lamport as 
Superintendent of the U.S. Military 
Academy at West Point. 

Maj. Gen. Alexander D. Surles, Jr., 
has relieved Maj. Gen. Andrew J. 
lioylc as Commanding General, 
Armor Center, Fort ICnox, Ky. 

Maj. Gen. Frank A. Osmanski has 
been assigned as Deputy Commanding 
General, Army Supply and Mainte- 
nance Command, and Chief, Army 
Materiel Command Operational Readi- 
ness Office. 

The U.S. Army Mobility Command 
has appointed Dr. Ernest N. Pctrkk 
IIH chief scientist at MOCOM Head- 
quarters, Warren, Mich. 

Brig. Gen. Elias C. Townsend suc- 
ceeds Maj. Gen. Charles F. Leonard, 
Jr., as Commanding General, U.b. 
Army Intelligence Command, I'ort 
Holabml, Md. 

Brig. Gen. William B. Latta has 
been assigned as Commanding Gen- 
oral, Army Electronics Command, 
Fort Momnouth, N.J. His previous as- 
signment was as Deputy Chief oi 
Staff for Communications and .iec- 
tronics, North American Air Defense 
Command and Continental Air ue- 
fonse Command. 

Brig. Gen. Walter B. Bcas is new 
Commanding General for the vast 
European network of signal facilities 
of the Army's Strategic Communica- 
tions Command. 

Col. Wyatlc G. Trainer became 
Comptroller in the Office of the Chief 
of Engineers on Jan. 8. He succeeds 
Col. Cecil II. Fuller, who has rejaicdj 
Col. Rcmi 0. Renter has been assigned 
as Dep. Div. Engineer, New England 
Div., U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, 
Waltham, Mass, to succeed Col. Ld- 
ward J. Bibbs, who plans to retire 
early in 1966. m,if 

Col. Lawrence R. Klar, former Chief 
of the Objectives Div., Defense Corn- 
Defense Industry Bulletin 




mum'cations Agency, .has been named 
new head of the Equipment Applica- 
tions Directorate of the Army's Stra- 
tegic Communications Command. He 
relieves Col. J, G. Moak, who is the 
command's new Chief of Staff. 

Col. William J. Durrenberger, Com- 
manding Officer, Springfield Armory 
since July 1963, has assumed com- 
mand of the Army Tank Automotive 
Center, Warren, Mich. He succeeded 
Col. Henry Davidson, Jr., who has 
retired. 

Col. Morton M. Jones, Jr., has 
joined the Army Mobility Command, 
Warren, Mich., as Project Manager 
Tor General Purpose Vehicles. 

Command of the Army Research 
Office-Durham, N.C., has been as- 
sumed by Col. John C. Raaen, Jr. 

Assignment of Lt. Col. Leslie G. 
Callahan, Jr., as the first director of 
the Avionics Laboratory has been an- 
nounced by Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Fort Monmouth, N.J. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

RAdm. John J. Hyland has been as- 
signed as Commander of the U.S. 
Seventh Fleet in the Far East. The 
new Seventh Fleet Commander, who 
will be promoted to the rank of vice 
admiral, previously served as Director 
of the Strategic Plans Div., Office of 
the Chief of Naval Operations, Wash- 
ington, D.C. 



RAdm Allan F. Fleming has been 
selected as Assistant Director of the 
Strategic Plans Div., Office of the 
Chief of Naval Operations. He was 
Commander Carrier Division Four 
prior to his new assignment. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Maj. Gen. Osmand J. Ritland, 
Deputy Commander, Manned Space 
Flight, Air Force Systems Command, 
Andrews AFB, Washington, B.C., has 
retired from the Air Force. 

Maj. Gen. Harold E. Humfeld has 
been reassigned as Commander of the 
Strategic Aerospace Div., SAC, Van- 
denberg AFB, Calif. 

Brig. Gen. Thomas H. Crouch, has 
relieved Maj. Gen. Theodore C. Bed- 
well, Jr., as Commander, Aerospace 
Medical Div., Air Force Systems Com- 
mand, Brooks AFB, Tex. 

Tung-Sheng Lin has been named 
Systems Engineering Director of the 
C-5A Systems Program Office. 

Col. Currie S. Downie has been as- 
signed as Director of Research Pro- 
grams, Office of Aerospace Research. 
Col. Richard E. Potter is the new 
Director of Command, Control and 
Communications, Headquarters, U.S. 
Air Force. 

The Air Force System's Command's 
new liaison office in Saigon will be 
headed by Col. John V. Patterson. The 
new office was established by the com- 
mand's Aeronautical Systems Div. 

Col. Bert M. Smiley has succeeded 
Brig. Gen. William R. Yancey as 
Deputy for Reconnaissance at the 
Aeronautical Systems Div., Air Force 
Systems Command, Wright-Patterson 
AFB, Ohio. 



Small Business Firm 
Wins Heater Contract 

Small business concern managers, 
who sometimes feel that competing 
for Government contracts is solely for 
large industry, should take heart from 
the example being set by Keysor of 
Byron, Inc., a small business located 
in Rockford, 111. 

The company was successful in win- 
ning a $1,689,270 multi-year (3 years) 
Army contract to produce 16,500 
-25* P. heater kits for use in the 
Army's M151 Vi-ton trucks. 

The contract, which was set aside 
for small business concerns, was 
awarded to Keysor of Byron as a re- 
sult of competitive bidding. 

It was the first time that a two-step, 
formally advertised, high dollar vol- 
ume, major secondary item was ever 
awarded by the Army on a multi-year 

^Delivery of the heater kits will con- 
clude in May 1968. 

The contract was awarded by the 
Office of the Project Manager for i Sen- 
era! Purpose Vehicles, Army Mobility 
Command, Warren, Mich. 



Sparrow Missile Tests 
Conducted by USN-USAF 

A joint Air Force-Navy project is 
under way at the Air Force Missile 
Development Center, Holloman AFB, 
N.M., to assess the performance tf 
the Sparrow missile when used with 
an Air Force F-4C or a Navy F-4B. 

The F-4C is the McDonnell-built 
multipurpose two-man fighter aircraft 
able to fly at Mach 2 speeds and bet- 
ter. The F-4B is tbe Navy version of 
this aircraft. 

The AIM-7D air interceptor missile 
Sparrow is a single-stage solid-fuel 
air-to-air missile. It has a slim 12-foot 
long by eight-inch-diametev shape, and 
a wingspan of 40 inches. 

Other flight tests in the overall 
joint program are being conducted at 
the Navy's Point Mugu station m 
California and at Eglin AFB, Fla. 
Tests are being conducted at varying 
altitudes and speeds to investigate dif- 
ferent flight or compatibility problems. 



Feb. 10-11: Armed Forces Communi- 
cations & Electronics Assn. Sym- 
posium, Sheraton-Park Hotel, 
Washington, D. C. 

Feb. 13-16: Radiation Research Soci- 
ety Meeting, Coronado, Calif. 

Feb. 17-19; Institute of Management 
Sciences Meeting, Dallas, Tex. 

Feb. 28-March 2: 8th Joint National 
Security Industrial Assn. Indnstry- 
Military-Government Packaging & 
Materials Handling Symposium, 
Washington, D. C. 

March 3-4: DOD-Natioaal Security 
Industrial Assn. Advanced Planning 
Briefings for Industry, Boston, 
Mass, 

March 9-10: DOD-National Security 
Industrial Assn. Advanced Planning 
Briefings for Industry, Atlanta, Ga. 
March 16-17: DOD-National Security 
Industrial Assn. Advanced Planning 
Briefings for Industry, St. Louis. 
Mo. 

March 21-24: Institute of Electrical 
& Electronic Engineers Exposition, 
New York City. 

March 22-31: American Chemical So- 
ciety Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pa. 



March 23-26: Air Force Assn. Con- 
vention, Dallas, Tex. 
March 27-April 2: American Society 
of Photogrammetry Meeting, Wash- 
ington, D. C. 

April 5-6: Armed Forces Communica- 
tions Electronics Assn.-U. S, Army 
Electronics Command Symposium, 
Fort Monmouth, N. J. 
April 11-15 : Institute of Environ- 
mental Sciences Meeting, San 
Diego. 

April 12-13: DOD-National Security 

Industrial Assn. Advanced Planning 

Briefings for Industry, San Fran- 

ciso, Calif. 

April 18-21: Aerospace Medical Assn. 

Meeting, Las Vegas, Nev. 
April 18-22: American Geophysical 
Union Meeting, Washington, I). C. 
April 18-22: American Society of 
Tool and Manufacturing Engineers 
Meeting, San Francisco, Calif, 
April 24-28 : American Society of 
Mechanical Engineers Meeting, 
Kansas City, Mo. 

April 27-28: DOD-National Security 
Industrial Assn. Advanced Planning 
Briefings for Industry, Washington, 



Navy Bureau of Yards & Docks 
Manages DOD Construction in S.E. Asia 



As construction agent in South- 
east Asm for the Department of De- 
fense, the Navy's Bureau of Yards 
and Docks has been responsible for 
the completion of more than $1GO 
m ' ita ""^ruction in 



TI- 1 """"j luiiabi-uction in I'acilitv. i 
Vietnam and, on completion of steel Slkn 



tional air facility, chiefly for heli- 
copters, has been constructed at Da 
Nang East which is separated from 
the mam air base by the Touruno 
River. Called Marblo Mountain Air 
Facility, it has a 2,000-foot pierced 



GSA Authorizes 

Sale of Security 

Cabinets to Canada 

Canada's Department of Dofciico 
has been ft-ivcn pen-mission by the 
General Services Administration's 
U.S. Federal Supply Service to imr- 
ehaso approved Class IT! non-lnsuW- 
od security filing cnbfnnts for use 
within tho Dominion of Canada The 
request; for this authorization 'came 
from tho Director of Industrial Se- 
curity, Department of Defence Pro- 
duction, Government of Canada, Ot- 
tawa, Canada. 

Canadian contractors. Including 
Canadian ffovornmontal iijrtmcios. innv 
bo authorised by Fodunil aironc PB to 
utilise our Federal Supply Sehudutea 
pursuant to the nrovlainns of Hubpnrl 
l r fi.y, 1'odoral Procuroimmt HeRulti- 
tions, and Section 101-2(1.407, Federal 
Property Management Halations 

In addition, tho 1'c-doml Supply 
Sorvice will permit its Fedora! S ,n- 
ply Schedule contractors to null cquJn. 
niont directly to the Canmllnn <mvn - 
ment or any contractor nutliorlMd by 
tlui (Canadian ffovornnidnl to iiurchtme 
such .cquipmonl. Tho tf mnt of sell 
pormiHsinn will acconnnodnto tlm oov- 
ornmont of Canada in macs j n WH ich 
it or itn couti-actora nro not e 
to procui-o cablnots uudor tho 
of tho above cited ro K ulationH, 



by 

'jff. Gen. Stephen I). McKlroy, USAF 



Tho new North American Air Dofcnsc 
Command Operations Center in Choy- 
onno Mountain near Colorado Springs, 
Colo,, became operational on January 
1 of thin year. Thin command and con- 
trol complex is deep within the heart 
of tho legendary 0,200-foot peak tow- 
ering more than half a mile over Col- 
orado .Springs and in fant heroini'in; 
honeycombed with a network of pas- 
sages (Hied with three story bnilding!i. 
[ntiido are communication'. 1 ! facilitfen 
engineered and inntallod by the Air 
Iconic IiojvinUiiH (loinnmnd'ii (iron nil 
Electronies Knginrorinn; hmlallutlun 
Agency (({HKIA ). 

Tho Cheyenne Mountain joh in only 
one of tin; many aiimiHaneouM engi- 
neering, inslallation ami maintenaai-e 
tasks carried nut hy (.'KKIA, lint 

tli in wnnn't always the rase. 

Prior to litiiH tliere WITH H.( Air 
Foreo activiticii in nome ni'ven com- 
mands engaged in (,1m hmiinewi of en- 
gineering and installing ground Corn- 
municationH-I'Iloctronicji (O K) facili- 
ties. TlniH, thorn exinlod emnliernomo 
coordination rhaniieln, competition 
for limited rouourcoH, a dimupatinn nf 
1'cnournm nnd a imn-iilandardixation 
or ond product.'). All thin coiiLrihuLcil 
to a vory d(<liiHpii>nt Air l-'nroc 
Wound (' V, program. 

Out of thi'iio cin-uniiitaiH'i'ii, (1KKIA 
WIIH horn on Juno Ki, 1!H'.K. Tim rcn 
trali/ml tln> vanl. majoritv of Uic Air 
Korco Kniuiid (,' K oiiKiniicriiiK and 
iimtallatlon ri'iiuircnioul!! under iino 
coinmand, tin- Air I-'on-o l,oirintii'n 
('onunand (AI-'IX!). 

(IMKIA iilarlcd with !hr mnall 
trndni of til^rtit i.llinTii, onu airmail 
and 1>0 civlllani! at (Irinimi AFH, 
N.Y., an part of tho Homo Air 
Matnrlf. Area ( I1OAMA ). Today, 
M'.l'iIA'H fur llunjf ui-f-rani'/alional ('In- 
numtH aro round In all cornoni of i\w 
fnio world. IVrnoniirl aro working in 
4f> HtiitiiH and 111) fin-i-lKii countrira. 
from CajHi Kiinnoily to Hititfon nnd 
AthmiH to Ancliora^.. (JKKIA trunim 
can ho found at more limn .101) dif- 
ferent looiitioim on tiny Kivmt day, 

In HKl'1, ilu- mohile depot nelivity 
iniltfl, which porfitrined on-Hito dnpo't 
Uivol maintt'iianco on ground (MO 
^car, woro iiHjiiKtiod to and merged 
into tho dKRIA tH'^iiiifwUiuii. 

AH,(! aniionnciMl on Jan. .1, l!)(ir, 

S^Aii 1 !' 1 ' 1 ^ WIIH " l""K"i' imrt of 
KUAMA and was to rojiort dirifclly 
to Ilmulnuni'UirB, AKf.C. CMIOIA'H 
miHHion IH covored hy A KU! Kc^uln- 
uon 2H-47. It ((nconijiaHHeH tlican ri(- 



* Develop and puhlmh technical 
fltandanla. 

Provido lochnicnl nHHiHtanco di- 
vectly to Air Force commands ia de- 
veloping C-]',: n(t]ulromciil8 in what 

Defense lndu*trv Bullntln 



Knffinnr, intitall and provide on- 
sito dopot bv(il maintonance on 
ground (j_K facilities. 

. Control and manage C~E mate- 
riol _ remnmios needed to accomplish 
the installation and dopot level main- 
tenaiico on C-R facilities. 

Accomplish systems implemonta- 
Ljon testniK and acceptance of facili- 

' 



. . :--! iiiterferenct! radia- 
tion and ha/,ard reduction, 

e Train ami develop a reserve force 
lr wartime or national emergency. 

Participate, as required, in the 
Military Assistance Program (MAP). 

Provide oa-site mobile depot level 
maintenance for ground C-K facili- 
ties. 

GIOUIA prepares the engineering 
required for installation and then car- 
''J l 's out the installation of ground 
C-M facilities such as communica- 
tions centers, long range radars. Nav- 
AidH, command and control systems, 
to name a few. The customer (the 
major air commands) initiates the 
requirement. (JKI'IIA insures that 
the material is available to do the' 
jolt, that it arrives on site by tho re- 
quired installation date, that it is 
completely installed, tested and then 
turned over to the customer. 

However, GIOKIA's concern does 
not end here. Tt continues with the 




responsibility for on-site depot level 
maintenance and the modification of 
the equipment which it installed. Ad- 
ditionally, when the equipment be- 
comes obsolete and is no longer re- 
quired, GEEIA knocks it down. Thus, 
its job in the C-E business is more 
than a "cradle-grave" operation. It 
is a conception to tho grave" respon- 
sibility. 

GEEIA has 42? officers, 4,200 air- 
men, .-J,000 civilians, including 1,400 
civil service, 1,100 wage board and 
TfeAT, ,' eiR: " nationals. Under a 
Ub Alt -directed program it is convert- 
ing its 758 Contract Technical Serv- 
ices personnel to civil service nnd 
military members. 

This force is further backed by a 
iirst-lme, fully-qualified installation- 
mamtenance capability present in the 
Air National Guard (ANG). 

Approximately 3,000 highly skilled 
troops in 17 ANG squadrons are lo- 
C A$A in thc Unitcd States. These 
ANtr officers and airmen, with ap- 
proximately 17 to 20 years experi- 
ence each in tho C-E installations 
business working for Bell Telephone, 
local power companies, etc., repre- 
sent a valuable capability as a C-E 
recovery force in tho event of na- 
tional emergency or disaster. In their 
training periods, these ANG troops 
are accomplishing useful and valuable 
work for the Air Force. GEEIA work- 
loaded these squadrons last year with 
more than 150,000 matihomu 

At tho work sites, the job is in 
the hands of an installation team. 
HUB team will range in size from 
two to 15 airmen. Tho team chief 
IN usually n noncommissioned offi- 
cer. In some cases it hns been nec- 
essary to place tho responsibility En 
the hands of an airman first class. 

Since GEEIA has a bigger workload 
than its organic capability, it must 
go to contract for some of its work- 
!?S&T? or example, '" the past year 
GEEIA took on 4,500 jobs 3,500 by 
GEMA troops nnd 1,000 by contract, 
home of the recent accomplishments 
of these men have created high level 
interest and borne such names as 
Star Sapphire, Back Porch, Wind 
Drift and the previously mentioned 
Uicyenno Mountain complex. 

As a moans of improving emer- 
e , n y support to command customers, 
GEETA developed project TRUST 
(transportable units and self-suffi- 
cient teams). This is a GEEIA plan 
to fulfill that part of GEEIA's mis- 




MEETINGS AND SYMPOSIA 



FEBRUARY 1966 

Hyponium 071 Kiulioiwotope, Applica- 
ia Aerospace, Kelt, Ifi -.17 (cor- 
nmutd dulo), nt Hiltmoro, Hotel, Day- 
ton, Ohio, and Wright I'uUisivion Al''il, 
Ohio. Co-.spoiif!ors; Air ]>\mw Klijvht. 
Dynamic;) Laboratory and Atomic 
I'.iHirtfy Commmion (Radiation Appli- 
c.ntiomj Branch, hiolopeH Development 
Div.). Contact: Dr. I'anl I'oli.Hlmli, 
Air [''oral Kliffht DynaniicM I.ahova- 
lory, WrlKlit-J'attorHiia AKU, Ohio, 

lnterdiHci|dinary AnpeclH of Kadin- 
iic(lv Kncrfiy Transfer, l-Vh. 1M -2(1, at 
thi! Hhm-uton Hotdl, I'hiladolphia, Pa. 
SpoiiHor; Olllcii of Naval Ummarch. 
Contact: Morton Coopur, Odlci! of 
Naval Hi'mirdi (Codo 4HK), Depart- 
ment of the. Nnvy, Wajthinj-ton, D.C. 
mm, (Avon (lodo 20B) OXford (1-OHHU. 



MARCH 1966 

National Confm'enc.o on Snare Main- 
fenaiu-e uiul Mxlni Vehicular Activi- 
IICH, March lit, at the. Meyor Motor 
Inn, Orlando, Kin. Co-npominni; Air 
I 1 <>rc A (tni I'ropuhmm Laboratory mid 
Mailin CD. Contact: Mr. K. Mny 
(AI'K'I 1 ), Air Komi Aoi'u rropuhiion 
I-alKirutory, Wi'Mili-I'iillM-mm A KIl. 
Oliiu4fi.lH, (Arai (.ludofiLS) lifi.'l-Ytll, 
oxt. 2-7107. 

Nyinpuitiuni on Mm <\iujilluK of 
llimicnnil Applii'd Cummion KcHcaiTh, 
Man-h Ul !!, at Urn Nalioiml Hurciui 
of StiimliinlH, WiiHhinsliin, |i.(!,, anil 
(laitliorMlmrB, Mil. Co-tipoiiiiorn: (>nici> 
of Naval Kwarch l-iihoralory uuil 
Niilioiiii] Thivcau of Stundanht! Cnn-' 
tact: Dr. Itichanl C. CarliiUui, OIHni 
of Naval Itairdi, MoparLnifiit of Llin 
Navy, WnaliinKton, !).(!. 1>OHHO. (Avon 
(I(ln202) OXfovd li IBOI. 

(lonfcnimiw on Kiincllunnl Aua|y H in, 
March liH-Apvil 1, at tin* llnivunilly 
nl t-ahforniii, fi-vlno. Calif. Cu-jipon'- 
Horn: Air Fora* Offlco of Hcicntilli' 
UcMcairli and tho irnivoniiLy of Cali- 
furnia. (JonUidl: K. (J. l'o]in>r 
(HUMM), Air Foix- Ofllci- of Helen. 
li(l HfiHuarrti, 'IVniiio I), <Hli SL, nnd 
rndo|Hmd[Mu:o Avo., H.W., Waiiliimrlon, 
U.C. 20388, (Area Code 202) OXfovd 



Dctrirlt, Frederick, Md., (Area Code 
III) I) (Kin -1111, i-xL. HM. 

Low Kpiwd Aorodyiuunir Prulih-nm 
AiinociaUid with HclinijiicrH and V/ 
S F I'(H( Aircraft, March .'ID-April 1, nt 

Uiillalo, N.V. Co-npomioni; tl.S. Army 
Aviiil.iiiii Malrrml LiilMiratoricn anil 
lilic Coi'imll A i-ruimii tinil liiihtirdUn'.v, 
Contact: John K. Ynih'M, Chief, At-rn- 
nnvliiiiiicH Div., Army Aviaiioii Muti'' 
I'iiil l.alioralorioi, Kurt I'lunliii, VJL 
iiillHM, (Amu Codn 70!i) H7K-.il.lH. 



APRIL 1966 

nd Hynipoiiiinn on Marine Illo- 
April li H. nl. Aincrican 
Mniii'inu of Nnliiral Ilinltu-y, Ci-nlnil 
I'arli Wrul t 7!Mh SI., Nrw Vi.rlt 
City and Naval '1'raininn I levin- 
C.-iiior, I'oct WaidihiKliMi, N.Y, Spun- 
;">]: Naval TraininiV Dcvlrr- C.-nirr, 
Contact: I-'. \>], Wolf. Jr., Ki-ni-mvli 
I'1'on'nini ManaK'-i', Naval 'I'niininjt 
lUivK-o Ct'iiti-r, I'iii-l WmiliiiiKlini. 
N.V. MllfiO, (Aiva C,, ( |r I.Mi) I'D V 
1)100, 'xt. 5110. 

CiinlVri'in'n mi (Ironmt Ha.'it'd At-ru- 
aoiaic HIiidii-H of the Lower lono- 
Hplierc, April II 1!., nl lin- l)i.f,.nn,. 
' 



- 

linlinn-iit, (liin'l-:), OMawa. Canada. 
Cii-iipuMiiiir.i: Air l''.uv.- CiiinhridK'' 
Ki'M'aivh l.ahoralnrii'H nnd DHTK, 
Conhu-l: W, I'flni,']- (Ciitllt). Air 
I'Wre ('iiinlit'idKf Uejieiiirli l.ahonil.ii- 
ien, 1,, C. llaiuicoiii Ki<dd, Maim. (HV.'it, 
(AiVH Code (!I7) ('It 'I Hint), ext KOlU, 



Sitwrnd Inlornntlonal SyinpoHium on 
Aorobloloffy, Murch 20-HO, at (Jiiloaffo, 
111. Co-.sponKoi-H: U.H, Army and Illi- 
iiolfl Inntituto of Tcclinnlogy HcHi'iu'ch 
TnHtlLuld. Contact: lOlwotnl 1C. Wolff!, 
Director of Technical JjurvlcoH, Fort 



on (n-nerali'ml Nel- 
wor!(, (.fill in a m'rii'ii (( f interim 
lional ityntpfinia .n'Kiilti/eil ly Ihr 
I'olylMinlr IniiLitnle uf UninKlyn, 
ftlH'itiwnvi- licneareh liuilitnle, April 
1H I'l, at New York Cily, Kpuiitiuni: 
Air Fonv Ollle,- of .Scienlific liem-Mivh, 
O/lli'i- uf Nnval Hi'in-atvli, Army lie 
neareh Oflli'i'. Snclcty for IndiiM tin! 
and Appliinl Miithenialifii and DIP 
IiuUlliilo for KU-etnVal itntl Klirh-niitni 
lMi|iinet'ni. Contact: M. Ci.l. K, I' 
Cauies, Jr., (SUNK), Air Kom- Otllrr 
of Sclenlifir Hem-arch, 'h-nipo II, ,|Di 
M. and liidrpendenn> AVI-., MW 
WmilihiKlon, D.C., (Area Co.h- ;:ili;') 
OX'ford li mi. 

Twenliiah Anniiiil l<*rof|itt>ncy t'nu- 
Ivol .Sympo.siuni, April l!l ',11, nt Du- 
.SlHilliuniH Iloti-1, Allnnlie City, N,,l, 
Sjiojwor: Army Klfilionioi Uhoralm-. 
Uw. (-o)ilncl: M. I'\ TJiiiin, Nulltl Ktiiln 
& 1' rt'qui'Hcy C.mtrol l)lv. t Army Klec- 
IninicH UlnmttiiritiH, l-\irt Mnnimmlli. 
N.J., (Area (,'odo 201) fi-1728. 



Mitthematical ANnet'ln of Ci 
SoicniT, datc:i nmle|i>niiim'd, 
Ytirlt (Illy, Sjhiiiintnn Air l-'on-r ()|| 
nt' Mcirnt.ilir Uivicari'li, Army licut-iii 1 
Ollh'C'l hirlium, I nut i til 1 1- I'm' |)i>f ( .| 
Analyne:!, Awim-inl inn J'm ( 'oiuptiti; 
Macliiiii'rv, Aii-'iiicinliiiii f..i' J-iynilin' 
l,nj;ic nnd llh- Amt'ricaii Mnlln'iiuiIJi 
Siu'ii-ty. I'milnrl: I'npt. ,1, .tmu>-i , 
(SKMA), Air Kmv,. Mtllr- i.f .'J.-iiVill 
keiu'Mivli, 'IVtnjiii D. 1th M, INK! In,! 



MAY 1966 

Symposium mi Mlechndi' l'nn'i'n H( i 
Muy I li, ui ( 'li'\vl.,nd, (ihi.t, t l f t;i|i () ) 
i:inc Air l-'ni-i-n nilliv 1,1 Ni'li-ntil 
lii-iifinvl. tunl ||IM I'llt'rM'.ii-tii-mtci 
Sorii-ly, Inc., C.intiirl ; 1,1, Cu| M I 

.spiinii.'i t;;u<:i, Air i''..i,-,- oiiii,- . 

Urii'titifn- Ki'jicmvli. 'I'l-mpn II, ttlt M 
and lnilt-|) ..... )<<ni'p A vr , S W WHSI] 
iiiKlcni, !>,(!. WMli, (Ami Co.lc J!03 
li .'i'/nt; 



U-H ;iyii(|ii.;iitiui i:iiii. Mity II f 
lit tin' Nh'-ntliiu l|,,f..|, llityl.ni, nhi| 
{nvii-tii-diilril IV ..... Miuvh l!it;ti| c,) 
npinr.iit'ii: Ariniipiir.i M.'itii,,] Ui-n-iuv] 
l.ithni-jilni v. A.-I.-^JUI,,. MMlinil ||v, 
Hint AviniiiiMi l,;di>nit(..i v. Air Kimi 
liiv 1'iuvli uiul T- I'hiir.loKV Div. C,ni 
I" 1 ': li\ II. I.. tt..|.itivli-ln<: 
(AIUIIAM). A.-t.t.pjin- M.-illi'ii) \ltf 
tifinvli l.nliMiaioi v, WiucM i'iii!.i ;! ,,| 
Al'll, Ohio, (Aien t'toln tii:i| '.'(1!| 
VII !, r\l. :i liHl.'i 

Ninth Navy Hrictiri* ;iyiit|i..-ilun| 
t\l'i.V I- H. al ll.'itiiilrn.'iihil Ainliln 
riiiio, CMii:>ihiti><n AVI-,, In !,,- l;|(l! 
and IHh Mh.Tli, ,\,W, Wstfihtitiil..)* 
!,(', ,S|Htii.iHr; (lllli'r iif N'HV.I) Kt>- 
rn'iireli, ('..iiliu-t; liuh.-H ,|. Mlmhik 
(''mft-i.-in-.' Cluiinmtn, (li!ti-..f N'nviil 
, h.-miiim.'iu ,.f the Niuy, 
ijtoit, JU', UiinmL (Arm l.'.Mltl 
l!li;!l OXf.inl li IV;!it, 



SPRING 1966 | 

Alrhoriit' Infrclion, tlitici un<l-!.Ti 

Depititineitl ..(' Ihi' An.tv u*it| tlu' 
JnltltH HlMiUll^ Nrhtm) M? M' .1). j'm'i 

(imhirl: KIwiMHl k, WMlfc, HiivdHf 
i f 'fVrliiiinU Hi-rvirrw, |-',,,( l^lricW 
I-mh-rii-k, Md., (An-Ji l.'nd.- .'(Ml) fM'! 
4111. .'xt. ;j;!H, lUi'w-lutiniM frnffl 

tn. aw.'ji. iwt,). ; 



January 




by 

Jack L. Flippo 

Chief, Contractor Data Management Office 
Headquarters, Air Force Logistics Command 



Over a period of many years, the 
preparation and acquisition philoso- 
phy of engineering documentation by 
the Defense Department has been un- 
dergoing an evolutionary change. To 
somo this evolution appears revolu- 
tionary, We could evaluate this 
change as "going around the horn" 
or, in the military vernacular, doing 
a "one-eighty" degree turn. 

Historically, engineering documen- 
tation has been prepared in support 
of research and development, pro- 
duction, manufacturing and testing. 
Its main purpose has been to provide 
a means of translating information 
from tho engineering arm to the 
drawing board in such a manner that 
it could be used by either the manu- 
facturing or procuring activities, as 
appropriate. Perhaps a better way of 
expressing it would bo to say, "engi- 
neers do not design drawings"' they 
design things; the drawings then be- 
como tho pictorial delineation of 
those things. 

Tho Air Force, for many years, 
has been using a variety of speci- 
fications to advise contractors how to 
prepare their engineering drawings 
in support of tho items that the mili- 
tary buys. This is especially true 
when the military is paying for the 
dojjijrn of purely military hardware. 

Let us begin with the year 1953, 
when the first of those specifications, 
M1L-D-5028 (ASG), was issued. The 
"A" revision was issued in 1954 and 
tho "B 1J revision in 10B6. MIL-D-G028 
was a dynamic document which un- 
derwent numerous changes during a 
relatively unchanging time when 
viewed in terms of the present day 
situation. The scope of the specification 
covered "the preparation of manu- 
facturers' engineering design draw- 
ings, as defined in Section 6, and re- 
lated data lists for the production of 
aeronautical and associated equip- 
ment." Paragraph 6.1 of the specifi- 
cation, titled "Intended Use," stated, 
"Drawings and data lists covered by 
this specification are for engineering 
evaluation of the articles, identifica- 
tion of stock, ordering and storing re- 
placement parts, inspection of articles 
at overhaul, and general maintenance 
of equipment in service." 

In no instance did the specifica- 
tion specifically state or imply that 
the data was to be used for competi- 
tive reprocurement. In those days it 
was always assumed by contractors 
that the drawings were being fur- 



nished to the Government for support 
of the intended uses, unless other- 
wise specified in the contract. 

In 1957, the Air Force, in order 
to improve its competitive position, 
developed MIL-D-26085, initiating 
the Air Force Control Drawing Pro- 
gram commonly referred to as the AF- 
CON Drawing Program. The AFCON 
Drawing Program cited) MIL-D-5028 
as an applicable document, but it 
substantially expanded the intended 
use to include procurement by in- 
corporating such statements as "are 
intended to be used as a portion of 
tho reprocurement data." The whole 
idea of the AFCON Drawing Pro- 
gram was not only to obtain engi- 
neering data suitable for engineering 
evaluation, but to assure that it was 
suitable for use by any manufactui*- 
er who would normally produce such 
items. 

Before the Air Force was actually 
able to gain experience and prove or 
disprove the worth of the AFCON 
Drawing Program, MIL-D-70327 was 
released. This specification was her- 
alded by both industry and DOD as 
tho ultimate in standardization cov- 
ering drawing preparation by the De- 
partment and its contractors. 

Paragraph 6.1 includes two con- 
cepts in particular which had _ not 
been a part of previous specifications. 
First, the data acquired by the Gov- 
ernment was "subject to rights-in- 
data acquired under the contract." 
This action now tied the acquisition 
of tho data to the Armed Services 
Procurement Regulation, Section IX, 
Part 2, hereafter referred to as 
ASPR, Secondly, it expanded the in- 
tended use to specifically state that 
the specification may be used by DOD 
activities for procurement, production 
and manufacturing, as well as some 
15 other intended uses. It also in- 
cluded tho statement, "and wherever 
engineering drawings are needed." 

At about this time, the now famous 
Secretary Pike memorandum, direct- 
ing the Military Departments to in- 
crease or rather optimize competitive 
procurement, was issued. This memo- 
randum had the effect of directing 
the Military Departments to initiate 
action to assure optimum competitive 
procurements. Upon release of MIL- 
D-70327, the revised ASPR policy, 
and the DOD stated policy "that the 
Military Services will optimize com- 
petitive procurement," the Air Force 
went all out to achieve the DOD ob- 



jective of maximizing competitive pro- 
curements. This was evident by or- 
dering drawings under the specifica' 1 
tion with the intended use of using 
them for manufacturing via the com- 
petitive procurement process. 

Shortly after the release of MIL-D- 
70327, the Air Force suspended any 
further implementation of the 
AFCON Drawing Program. This ac- 
tion was directed by DOD on the as- 
sumption that MIL-D-70327 provided 
the necessary tools to order engineer- 
ing documentation in support of the 
competitive procurement processes. 

While the engineering drawing pro- 
gram was going through the MIL-D- 
70327 evolutionary stage, a similar 
effort was undertaken to rewrite 
ASPR. The revised ASPR provided 
a broad definition of data and intro- 
duced the term "proprietary rights." 
The new version defined the condi- 
tions and limitation under which 
R&D contractors would be required to 
furnish data under research and de- 
velonment 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



MIL-D-70327 was excessively restric- 
tive and that grades of documenta- 
tion, based on the need, could be pro- 
duced at lower costs. Other industry 
associations and companies com- 
plained of the specification Christ- 
mas tree. 

While all this was going on, other 
contractors were complaining about 
the Government usurping their pro- 
prietary rights, The subject of pro- 
prietary rights became one of the 
leading issues of the day between the 
military and industry. It should be 
brought out here that it was not 
providing engineering drawings to 
the Government, but rather the legal 
right to disclose the data as an exam- 
ple in reproeurement packages, that 
was nt issue. 

The Air Force exercised great care 
and enthusiasm in attempting to im- 
prove its competitive position in the 
industrial community. To cite a few 
of the programs to improve competi- 
tion, the Air Force required contrac- 
tors to provide information concern- 
ing; methods of procurement and, 
where feasible, to provide procure- 
ment data packages. It initiated a 
comprehensive program to review 
drawings on hand to determine their 
usability for competitive procure- 
ment. 

Industry reacted strongly to these 
Air Force efforts to increase com- 
petitive procurement. Industry oppo- 
sition became evident almost immedi- 
ately. Contractors began removing 
so-called proprietary information 
from drawings, would not sign con- 
tracts which required the delivery of 
any data and placed prices on data 
which were tantamount to "not for 
sale." It was soon apparent that a 
serious breakdown of engineering 
data communication between the Air 
Force and its contractors was immi- 
nent. 

To eliminate or reduce the prob- 
lems, the Air Force initiated two ma- 
jor programs. The first was known 
as the Air Force's "Competition with 
Confidence" program. This was a pro- 
gram by which the Air Force and its 
contractors determined, at the time 
of provisioning (or at some mutually 
acceptable time during production), 
those items which were susceptible to 
competition. The second was the "De- 
ferred Delivery of Engineering Docu- 
mentation" program designed to leave 
the engineering documentation, which 
normally would have been delivered to 
tho Government, with the contractor 
but making provisions for Air Force 
activities to order the engineering 
documentation direct from the con- 
tractor engineering data flies on an 
"as required" basis. 

At about the same time, the Air 
Force Contractor Data Management 
Program, herein referred to as the 
310-1 program, was born. Under the 
310-1 program discrete items of data 
were developed against specific mis- 
sions to be supported by the draw- 
ings. Under the old program, MIL- 
D-6028, it was the general practice 
of the Air Force to buy complete sets 



of engineering documentation. Later, 
under the MIL-D-70327 program, 
even though the policy was to be 
more selective in that only that data 
which was specifically required need 
be ordered, the military continued to 
request a complete set of engineering 
data. 

While the Air Force was in the 
process of implementing the new Con- 
tractor Data Management Program 
under the joint Air Force Systems 
Command/Air Force Logistics Com- 
mand Manual 310-1, DOD, as a re- 
sult of the concerted efforts of indus- 
try, undertook two major projects. 
The first of these projects was the 
rewrite of ASPR to remove the pro- 
prietary rights problems. The other 
project was the revision of MIL-D- 
70327 to provide: (1) simplified 
drawing practices which would incor- 
porate the absolute minimum prepa- 
ration instructions; (2) a standard 
requirements document which could 
be incorporated in the specification, 
thereby eliminating such documents 
as the Navy WR-12 and the Air 
Force MCP 71-77; and (3) a quality 
control or acceptance method to vali- 
date that the ordering activity was, 
in fact, getting what it ordered and 
to assure it got that for which it 
paid. These two projects culminated 
in the release of ASPR and the re- 
lease of MIL-D-1000, dated March 1, 
1965, with a supporting MIL-STD- 
100, same date. 

MIL-D-1000 will provide the Gov- 
ernment a new basis of negotiating 
with contractors and also more flexi- 
bility between the Government and 
industry in ordering engineering 
data. It will permit the Government 
to order (1) data for a specific in- 
tended use and (2) drawings which 
do not fully comply to the require- 
ments of MIL-STD-100 and other 
standards specified in MIL-D-1000. It 
will minimize the requirements to 
prepare drawings to exacting, specifi- 
cations and hopefully will provide 
drawings to intended use, as opposed 
to the previoxis practices of ordering 
a complete sot drawn to exacting 
standards called for by MIL-D- 
70327. 

MIL-D-1000 is a real step for- 
ward. However, a few words of cau- 
tion are in order. First, there appears 
to be a false assumption inherent in 
the drawings preparation specifica- 
tion under intended use-, MIL-D-1000 
may cost the Government more money 
because when ordering drawings the 
Government specifies one or more of 
the 10 categories. Contractors will 
now need to review their drawings 
to determine whether or not they are 
suitable for the intended use speci- 
fied. As previously stated, contractors 
prepare their drawings in support of 
their design and productions, not in 
support of the military follow-on lo- 
gistic missions after production. A 
few examples are provided for ex- 
planatory purposes: 

Under Category D contractors 
must furnish on their drawings "de- 



" 



, 
nnl 



tails of performance ^ 

and quality levels and 

ments when necessary to 

between similar items." Is 

of information normally contain - on 

production drawings? 

Under Category G Ins *f' 1 VL 
drawings must contain tl 
equipment and facility r 

safety, precautions; and 

gineermg considerations. 

pie will agree that those .. 

things are rarely contained on * ll , m ?; 

ings, but are normally tiontiim* " in 

other documentation niuinUn in*" y 

the contractors. 

Under Category E Procu i 
(identical items) drawing** 
include, as applicable, but 
necessarily be limited to: clo 
unique processes essential to 

and manufacture; detailn <*' i." 1 * 1 - 
formance ratings; evaluation i-t'i lim '' 
ments and criteria." la UIIH iiilorrim- 
tion normally contamtHl 0|1 H 1 . 1 - 
drawing? If not, additional uom Will 
be incurred in making it ** in****- "' 
the drawing package in Hi'|>|'*>rL of 
advertised procurement by t-lits Cmv- 
ernment. 

The next area of caution c-ouensnm 
tho requirement to spocify ( para- 
graph 3.1, MIL-D-1000) at titins of 
contract award both cfiit'Mror.v ami 
form for each item. The ti;lm1<|im for 
implementing this rcquii^misni ap- 
pears as a real problem armi whim 
viewed in terms of ho\v to H|i<idfy 
category and form for cnch Lt<mi of 
supply at the time of coiilrnrt- uwnnl, 
This occurs at a time when you <hm't 
know what the item ia, how tin- ilorn 
will be reproduced, how thu ititm will 
bo re-manufactured, etc., arid, iti tho 
case of vendor items, who \ tin* ven- 
dor and who are his subvmi<li >r,u. 

Another consideration wltirli will 
take time to smoke out will In* lh<> 
real impact of the new "iirivtilo ox- 
penso" philosophy expr<*HH<!<1 in llni 
new ASPR, Naturally thin will huvo 
a strong bearing on tho i>nVc!t vnu-.ig 
and ability of the GovorTiinriil, in giro- 
cure adequate data in support ttt tin) 
Government roprocuremont | M'Mjjf nuns 
and logistic support. 

Thus, we have boon "tvroini<l UK: 
horn." Changes have benn mmt< in 
tho entire DOD acquisi Item p>i I lug- 
ophy for engineering rlatu. Tills 
philosophy has gone from oms of ntiy- 
ing, "Please give me a compl^ti* m?l o( 
engineering data for hit<*mliul imi's, 
as cited in MIL-D-5QH8," to *mv of 
saying, "Give me only that jKirtimi of 
your engineering data fllim rofiniroil 
to support specific rni&Hioim t 1 '" 8 
either furnish or prepare fir)<|itinnal 
data to meet the intended iiMts cate- 
gories when specified in tho tumtrjtct," 

Hopefully, the latter approm-h will 
provide data vital to logistic support 
once the military has acquire*! oj Mo- 
tional quantities of weapons aylcm 
and the contractor has c c* a H <N 1 to 
maintain a design and production 
capability. 



12 



January 



S M T W T F S 


S M T W T F S \ 


S M T W T- F S 


1 

a a a 5 6 ? e 

10 11 12 13 14 15 
10 17 18 19 20 21 22 
23 24 25 26 2? 28 29 

30 31 


123-15 
6 78 10 11 12 
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 
i-l 28 


12345 
6 7 8 9 10 11 li 
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 
27 28 29 30 31 



SPEAKERS CALENDAR 



OFFICE OF THE 
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

Dr. ThoimiH I*. Clieathiiiu, Jr., Dep. 

Hit 1 , (Tactical Warfare Programs) 
Ollice r Dm, Defense Research & 
Engineering, at Assn. of the U. S. 
Army Target Acquisition & Surveil- 
lance .Symposium, Ft. Huachuca, Ariz.. 
Jim. 2fi. 

Hon. John S. Foster, Jr., Dir,, De- 
I'ensi! Research & Engineering, at 
Institute of Kloetrical & Electronics 
Kngineei'H !!)(}() Winter Convention on 
Aerospace & Electronic Systems, Los 
AngoloH, Culif., Feb. 3. 

Mr. William B. Petty, Dir., Defense 
Contract Audit Agency, at National 
Contract Management Assn. Meeting, 
HiHmldphin, Pa., Feb. 8; at South- 
eastern Government Procurement 
.Symposium of the National Contract 
Management Assn., Orlando, Fla., 
March If or 4. 

Mr. Daniel .1. Fink, Dep. Dir. (Stra- 
tegic & Spaee Systems), Office of 
Dir,, Defense 'Research & Engineering, 



at American Astronautical Society 
Meeting, Washington, D.C., March 15. 
Lt. Gen. William J. Ely, USA, Dep. 
Dir. (Administration & Management), 
Office of Dir., Defense Research & 
Engineering, at Industrial College of 
the Armed Forces, Washington, D. C., 
April 7. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Lt. Gen. William F. Cassidy, Chief 
oP Engineers, at the Society of Ameri- 
can Military Engineers Meeting, The 
Citadel, Charleston, S. C., Feb. 9. 

Maj. Gen. David P. Gibbs, Chief 
of Communications Electronics, at 
Armed Forces Communications Elec- 
tronics Assn. Meeting, Ft. Monmouth. 
N. J., April 4-6. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

VAdm. I. J. Galantin, Chief of 
Naval Material, at Navy League 
Meeting, Los Angeles, Calif., Jan. 28. 



Capt. Walter F. Mazzone, Offlcer- 
m-Charge, Navy Medical Research 
Laboratory, Groton, Conn., at Annual 
Dinner of Central Illinois Chapter of 
the Society of Professional Engineers, 
Decatup, III., Feb. 22. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Hon. Harold Brown, .Secretary of 
the Air Force at Air Force Assn. Con- 
vention, Dallas, Tex., March 24-25. 

Gen. J. P. McConnell, Chief of 
Staff, at Air Force Assn. Convention, 
Dallas, Tex., March 24-25; at Arnold 
Air Society National Conclave, Dallas, 
Tex., April 6; at The Citadel, Charles- 
ton, S. C., April 16. 

Gen B. A. Schricver, Commander, 
Air Force Systems Command, at 
Achievement Rewards for College 
Scientists Annual Science Ball, Los 
Angeles, Calif., April 2; at American 
Institute of Aeronautics & Astronau- 
tics and American Society of Mechan- 
ical Engineers Meeting, Cocoa Beach, 
Fla., April 19. 



DCASR Activation Completed 



Defends Contract Administration 
Services Hofrion.4 (DCASR's) were 
activated at LOH Angeles and San 
1'Yanciscn on Dee, 1, thereby complet- 
ing a nationwide network of personnel 
performing contract administration 
KerviciiH .Cor the Army, Navy, Air 
Force tind the Defense Supply Agency. 

The (h'Ht of a total of 11 DCASR's 
wa.4 (mtiihlishod at Philadelphia in Au- 
giiHt HUM. Detroit was activated in 
April LiHiO followed by Dallas, Boston, 
Cleveland, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis 
York. 



The LI DCASH's administer De- 
fense contracts for the military buy- 
ing agencies nationwide. This work 
includes lire-contract award surveys 
of contractors' facilities and financial 
Htfttus, quality assurance, security 
clearance for plants and personnel, 
payments to contractors and similar 
functions required by the Govern- 
ment during the manufacture and 
maintenance of defense materiel. 

Following IB a list of the 11 De- 
fense Contract Administration Serv- 
ices Regions including' addresses and 
telephones numbers: 

DCASR, Atlanta 
3100 Maple Drive NE 
Atlanta, Ga. 30306 
(Area Code 404) 261-7310 

DCASR, Boston 
6GG Summer St. 
Boston, Mass. 02210 
(Area Code G17) 542-6000 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



DCASR, Chicago 

O'Hare International Airport 

P.O. Box 87G8 

Chicago, III. G0666 

(Area Code 312) 296-4411 
DCASR, Cleveland 

1367 East Sixth St. 

Cleveland, Ohio 44114 

(Area Code 216) TO 1-4960 
DCASR, Dallas 

500 South Ervay Street 

Dallas, Tox. 75201 

(Area Code 214) RI 9-2371 

DCASR, Detroit 

1580 East Grand Blvd. 
Detroit, Mich. 48211 
(Area Code 313) 923-0100 

DCASR, Los Angeles 
11099 La Cienega Blvd. 
Los Angeles, Calif. 90045 
(Area Code 213) SY 6-0471 

DCASR, New York 
770 Broadway 
New York, N.Y. 10003 
(Area Code 212) OR 7-3030 

DCASR, Philadelphia 
2800 South 20th St. 
Philadelphia, Pa. 19101 
(Area Code 215) 271-2000 

DCASR, St. Louis 
4SOO Goodfellow Blvd. 
St. Louis, Mo. 63120 
(Area Code 314) EV 2-8200 

DCASR, San Francisco 
866 Malcolm Road 
Burlingame, Calif. 94010 
(Area Code 415) 692-0300 



Military Construction 
Deferred 

Secretary of Defense Robert S. 
McNamara has announced that 620,- 
000,000 worth of military construc- 
tion projects will be temporarily de- 
ferred including the building of 8,500 
military housing units worth 1GO,- 
000,000. 

At the same time, Secretary 
McNamara gave the go-ahead for 
$686,000,000 in Army, Navy, Air 
Force and Marine Corps high prior- 
ity military construction projects in 
36 states, the District of Columbia 
and at 16 overseas locations. 

Defense Secretary McNamara, in 
making the announcement, empha- 
sized that all projects immediately 
essential for the combat support of 
the armed forces and those urgently 
required for safety, health, or other 
compelling 1 reasons will proceed as 
scheduled. 

The decision to defer projects lo- 
cated in 42 states, the District of 
Columbia and 16 sites outside the 
United States results from a new re- 
view of DOD expenditures focused 
on immediate requirements in direct 
support of combat forces in Vietnam. 

The construction projects to be de- 
layed for the most part are either 
long-planned replacements or improve- 
ments for existing facilities. The de- 
ferred projects, although necessary 
and desirable, can be undertaken at 
a later date without impairing mil- 
itary operations or effectiveness. 



13 




Speaker: VAdm. JostU'* 1 -, 
USN, Dir., Defense u * 
cy, at all five cities. 



SECOND 



The following Defense Department 
speakers at the 1966 DOD-National 
Security Industrial Association Ad- 
vanced Planning Briefings for Indus- 
try have been announced by Deputy 
Secretary of Defense Cyrus Vance. 
At press time, speakers representing 
industry and labor organizations had 
not been announced. Names of these 
speakers will be carried in the Febru- 
ary issue. 

FIRST DAY 

DOT) Keynote Address: Major objec- 
tives of the DOD and the program 
designed to implement them. The 
changing patterns in Defense spend- 
ing and the resulting problems and 
opportunities, 
Speakers: 

Hon. Paul R. Ignatius, Asst. Secre- 
tary of Defense (Installations & 
Logistics), at Boston, March 3; 
at Washington, D.C., April 27. 
Hon. Robert N. Anthony, Asst. 
Secretary of Defense (Comptrol- 
ler)) at Atlanta, March 9. 
Hon. Alain Enthoven, Asst. Secre- 
tary of Defense (Systems Analy- 
sis), at St. Louis, March 16. 
Hon. John S. Foster, Jr., Dir., De- 
fense Research & Engineering, at 
San Francisco, April 12. 
The Technological Challenge of the 
Next 10 Years; Future opportuni- 
ties for industry in all areas of de- 
fense research and development. 
Speakers: 

Daniel J. Fink, Dep. Dir. for Stra- 
tegic & Space Systems (Defense 
Research & Engineering;), at 
Boston, March 3. 

Lt. Gen. William J. Ely, Dep. Dir. 
for Administration & Manage- 
ment (Defense Research & Engi- 
neering-), at Atlanta, March 9. 
Dr. Thomas P. Cheatham, Jr., Dep. 
Dir. for Tactical Warfare Pro- 
grams (Defense Research & En- 
gineering), at St. Louis, March 
16. 

Dr. Chalmers W. Sherwin, Dep. Dir. 
for Research & Technology (De- 
fense Research & Engineering), 
at San Francisco, April 12. 
Thomas F. Rogers, Dep. Dir. for 
Electronics & Information Sys- 
tems (Defense Research & Engi- 
neering) at Washington, D.C., 
April 27. 

Systems Analysis and Coat Effective- 
ness: A discussion of the extensive 
use of systems analysis techniques 
within DOD to assist in the efficient 
allocation of Defense resources and 
the reasons why these techniques 
have been introduced. An explora- 
tion of the implication of this de- 
velopment for Defense industry. 
Speakers: 

Russell Murray II, Dep, Asst. Sec- 
retary of Defense for General 
Purpose Programs (System. Ana- 
lysis), at Boston, March 3; at 
Atlanta, March 9. 



Dr. Victor K. Heyman, Asst. for 
Special Projects (Systems Ana- 
lysis), at St. Louis, March 16. 
Hon. Alain Enthoven, Asst. Secre- 
tary of Defense (Systems Ana- 
lysis), at San Francisco, April 12. 
Fred S. Hoffman, Dep. Asst. Secre- 
tary of Defense for Strategic Pro- 
grams (Systems Analysis), at 
Washington, D. C., April 27. 
Resource Management Systems: DOD 
efforts to obtain integration and co- 
ordination among the multiple De- 
fense management programs with 
emphasis on management of major 
capital acquisitions Selected Ac- 
quisitions Information and Manage- 
ment System (SA1MR) and the 
participation therein of Defense con- 
tractors. Current activity and fu- 
ture planning in the components of 
SA1MS to include Cost Information 
Reports (formerly GETS) and Con- 
tract Performance Measurement. 

Speaker: 

George W. Bergquist, Special Asst. 
for Asset Management Systems 
(Comptroller), at all five cities. 

Management Trends in Defense Re- 
search & Development: ODDR&E 
efforts to clarify R&D management 
concepts and intent including both 
clarification and integration of all 
management policies affecting the 
conduct and desired operating en- 
vironment of R&D; emphasis on 
integration of direct R&D policies 
with related policies such as Sys- 
tem/Project Management, Configu- 
ration management, Total Package 
Procurement and Contract Defini- 
tion. 
Speaker: 

James W. Roach, Asst. Dir. for En- 
gineering Management (Defense 
Research & Engineering), at all 
five cities, 

Procurement Management Trends: 
Contracting trends, with emphasis 
on the impact of new or revised 
management techniques planned or 
under development such as Contrac- 
tor's Weighted Average Share in 
Risk (CWAS), Total Package Con- 
cept, Life Cycle Costing, extension 
of Contractor Performance Evalua- 
tion and profit opportunities under 
the new Value Engineering clauses; 
the Small Business and Contractor 
Cost Reduction Programs; Defense 
industry profits. 

Speaker: John M. Malloy, Dep. 
Asst. Secretary for Procurement 
(Installations Logistics), at all 
five cities. 

Defense Supply Agency Procure- 
ment Trends and Future Industry 
Relationships: The functions of the 
Defense Supply Agency, its pur- 
chasing and contracting objectives 
and the markets it offers for busi- 
ness and industry. 



Army Advanced 
ments: The Army's 
research and developi* 1 *; 
ments based on thti *\ t * 
move, shoot, comimini** 1 * ' ,\j 
the present and fuUU'** , t> . 
ties for business to '*u*l 
hardware and research |l 
ment in these aruan. 

Speakers: (At all flvu <ri ,\ 
Hon. Robert A. Brook-** ,j 

retary of the Army { ' * " 

& Logistics). j 

Gen. Frank S. Heufso' 1 *, ". , 

CG, Army Maturinl '"' ; 
Maj. Gen. John (I. ^'"''..i 

CG, Army Missile (>* ll l 

stone Arsenal, Ala. 
Maj. Gen. William % Y "i i i 

USA, CG, Army Mo'* 1 " 

mand, Warren, Mi<-l. f 

Maj. Gen. Roland H* 

USA, CG, Army \V;*M 

mand, Rock Island, I I". 
Maj. Gen. Floyd A. lln' 1 '^ 

CG, Army Munition^' <J 

Dover, N.J. 
Brig. Gen. William H, I ' II ^ 

CG, Army Eleclrotif i*i< <J 

Fort Monmouth, N.-l 

Navy Advanced Plantii n tf 
ments: A forward |:li- 
and Marine Corps rcit* 'f * 1 '' 
opment and procure n ** i I- 1 
cast of material req* i i r** 11 
support of the Nnvy J m * 
Corps, and a review of * t * t ** 
for business to provi*l* << 
onry and warfnro HytiLf-nn' 
and Marine Crpn will *'< 
the future. 

Speakers: 

Hon. Robert W, Mimu*, AH 
tary of Navy (U(<Hiit rt-ti 
opment) at Ho.stoii jtnti / 

Hon. Graeme C, HamitTnt 
Secretary of Navy ( 1 1 in 1 1 1 1 

Logistics) , at St, 1 1 i * i i r i J 

cisco, and WanhiiiHt* M 1 1 l;; 
(At all five cities) 
VAdm. I. J. Galatin tlMNT, 

Navy Material, 
RAdni. A. M. Kliinn IIMM, 

Bureau of Naval \V**mMO 
RAdm, Edward J. Kuliy I r( 

of the Bureau of Slii|,;i. 
Brig. Gen. Wood II. Kyh 

Headquarters, U.K. A, I n i'J 

Air Force Advanced I'liim 
quirements: The rnli- 
nities for businosti m , , , ^ 
the Air Force-indim t ry 
broad look at pi-uncnt :titt| f 
requirements of the j\ j r 
research, development et>t*i 
support with emi)hu!*Sji , 4( 
and technology pliiiiH 
lation of operational 
into development 1>U*,,, 
term research, dcvt >! , 
logistics support })i'*j<*ui"* 

(Continued on P 



14 




Ronald M. Murray 

Address by Ronald M. Murray, As- 
sistant Director (International Pro- 
grams), Office of the Director of De- 
fense t Research and Engineering at 
American Institute of Aeronautics 
and | Astronautics, Royal Aero-nautical 
Society, and Japanese Society for 
Aeronautical rind Space Sciences Air- 
craft, Design and Technology Meet- 
ing, Loa Anyeles, Calif., Nov. 17, 1965, 

International Cooperation in 

the Development of 

Military Aircraft 



The Reason for Cooperation, 

I would like to begin by asking- a 
question which our foreign friends 
sometimes ask us. It goes like this: 
"Since the United States military 
R&D budget is much larger than that 
of any of its allies, why are you in- 
terested in cooperating with us in 
R&D? What's in it for you?" A 
formal answer would quote from the 
Department of Defense directive 
(DOD Directive 3100.3) which in Sep- 
tember 19C8 spelled out our objectives 
for international cooperation to be as 
follows; 

"The U.S. will cooperate with its 
allies to the greatest degree pos- 
sible in the development of de- 
fense equipment, where such co- 
operation is in the overall best 
interests of the United States. 
The objectives of such coopera- 
tion will be: 

"1. To make the beat equipment 
available to the U.S. and its 
allies in the most timely man- 
ner. 

"2, To increase the effectiveness of 
the scientific and technical re- 
sources of the U.S. and its 



allies, especially by eliminating 
unnecessary and wasteful du- 
plicating of effort. 

"3. To achieve the maximum prac- 
ticable degree of standardiza- 
tion of equipment. 

"4. To create closer military ties 
among the alliance." 

I believe these reasons for coopera- 
tion are indisputable, important and 
general. To be more specific, in your 
own field of military aircraft, I 
would like to offer you two reason & 
for cooperation which are more 
closely related to your everyday work 
technology and money, 

What do we mean by technology? 
While indeed the American aircraft 
industry has much to be proud of in 
its technology and its accomplish- 
ments, it certainly must acknowledge 
the very excellent technical work 
done in other countries in recent 
years, resulting often in advances in 
fields in which we have been working 
and, sometimes, in fields which we 
ourselves have not been pursuing as 
hard as they. There are many paths 
to success, and breadth of approach 
is an important parameter before a 
final decision and selection is made. 

Consider the field of V/STOL, 
which is one of those in which we. 
are most active in cooperation with 
our allies. Look at some of the unique 
developments of the other countries. 
For example, we have in Great Brit- 
ain the vectored thrust P-1127 
V/STOL fighter; in France, the high- 
performance Mirage III-V, using a 
combination of lift and cruise en- 
gines; in Germany, the supersonic 
VJ-101, with its excellent system of 
engine thrust modulation for attitude 
control in the transitional modes. And 
look at the work which Japan has 
done in the application of STOL 
techniques to seaplanes an area, to 
my knowledge, not covered by those 
of us in the Western world. 

Obviously, we would have much to 
gain from cooperation in the V/STOL 
field and we have much to offer our 
partners from our own experimental 
V/STOL programs, as well as from 
our general base of aircraft tech- 
nology. 

Now as to money. I am sure you 
all know better than I the great in- 
crease in the cost of the development 
of military aircraft, the resulting 
strains on the development budgets 
and, since our budgets do- have finite 
limits, the limitations in the number 
of aircraft projects we can afford to 
pursue. For example, consider the 
cost of developing fighter aircraft. 
The F-86, which first flew in 1948, 
cost under $100 million to develop. 



Its big brother, the F-100, which 
first flew in 1953, cost around $200 
million to develop. Flying two years 
later, the F-105 cost about $400 mil- 
lion to develop. And now, first flying 
in 1964, the P-lll will cost about 
double the F-10C to develop. So there 
has been an increase in development 
cost from the F-86 to the F-lll of 
nearly an order of magnitude. Obvi- 
ously, it is essential for each of us, 
regardless of how large our R&D 
budgets are, to economize as much as 
we can in development costs, and ob- 
viously one logical way of doing this 
is to share the load with other people 
who have similar interests and sim- 
ilar competence in the field. The 
whole is greater than the sum of its 
parts, if we cooperate and the free 
world must do this if we are to stay 
free. 

The Ways of Cooperation. 

Now that you are convinced that 
cooperation in the development of 
military aircraft is highly desirable, 
consider the ways in which we in 
DOD believe that cooperation is prac- 
tical. 

The oldest form of inter-govern- 
mental cooperation, beginning inten- 
sively in World War II, is the ex- 
change of technical information. This 
is done tn a variety of ways, such as 
by formal government-to-government 
data exchange agreements, by ex- 
change visits and by participation in 
multi-national symposia like the V/ 
STOL symposium sponsored by the 
Advisory Group for Aerospace He- 
search and Development (AGARD) 
in NATO last year. 

During the last several years, the 
main aim of DOD has been to work 
out sharing of development projects, 
and we have been moderately suc- 
cessful in this. To illustrate, T would 
like to describe four different projects 
in the aircraft field that cover pretty 
well the more likely ways of coopera- 
tion. 

Starting upstream in the develop- 
ment cycle, we entered into an agree- 
ment a year ago with the United 
Kingdom for cooperative work in jthe 
experimental application of beryllium 
to jet engines. You probably are fam- 
iliar with the properties of beryl- 
lium which make it a highly promis- 
ing but challenging material for 
lightweight applications. Cooperating 
with the British on the application of 
beryllium was a natural. They had 
done a, lot of work in the refinement 
of beryllium to very high purities, 
while U.S. contractors had done much 
in forging, machining and joining: 
techniques. We each agreed that we 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



both would be better off by pooling 
these different capabilities and ex- 
perience for the experimental appli- 
cation of beryllium to engine com- 
ponents. We agreed to share the 
costs, the work and the results of 
nine specific tasks in materials im- 
provement and five tasks in engine 
applications. There are now a total 
of 10 U.S, and U.K. contractors and 
laboratories working on this project, 
with the promise of very real benefits 
to all. 

Now, let's move downstream one 
notch to advanced development proj- 
ects. Some of you are familiar with 
the joint design studies that the Air 
Force and the Federal Republic of 
Germany are~ having performed on 
high-performance, advanced V/STOL 
strike fighter aircraft. There are four 
U.S. firms and two German firms doing 
these studies, which will be completed 
in the spring of 1966. In these, the 
U.S. contractors are drawing upon 
their extensive V/STOL studies, such 
as ADO-12, their various experi- 
mental programs and their advanced 
technology for high-performance air- 
craft, German contractors are draw- 
ing upon their own studies of V/ 
STOL operation in the European the- 
ater, their design work on several 
V/STOL fighters and the flight test- 
ing of the VJ-101. And the joint de- 
sign studies were preceded by joint 
military studies to define the opti- 
mum mission specifications. 

The Germans and we expect the 
joint design studies to give the best 
possible indication of the capabilities 
and usefulness of high performance 
strike V/STOL aircraft for the 
1970's. With this information and 
considering the military and cost 
aspects, both we and the Federal Re- 
public should be able to make 'our 
iecisions next year as to whether to 
?o into the development of proto- 
types. Whatever the outcome, we 
should both be in a more knowledge- 
able position to reach our national 
decisions as a result of having looked 
at the problems jointly. 

Moving now from joint design 
studies to joint development projects, 
we recently concluded a detailed 
agreement with the United Kingdom 
for the development of an advanced 
lift engine for V/STOL applications. 
Here again we each have something 
to offer the other which should make 
our combined effort better than either 
of our individual efforts. The British 
contractor, Rolls-Royce, is the only 
company in the world that has had 
practical flying experience with jet 
lift engines. Through several differ- 
ent engine models, Rolls has provided 
the lift for British, German and 
French V/STGL's, At the same time, 
our engine contractors have for sev- 
eral years been working on advanced 
technology for lightweight jet en- 
gines, and four of our contractors 
have recently built test-rig demon- 
strators incorporating this technology 
to demonstrate thrust-to-weight; ratios 
heretofore unattainable. The pooling 
of this complementary experience and 



16 



knowledge, in a joint development 
project on an important and critical 
equipment, fulfills in the most direct 
way possible the DOD objectives of 
R&D cooperation. 

Another kind of cooperation takes 
place on those things whore we have 
each already done development and 
have built prototypes of equipment of 
mutual interest. For example, we 
have agreements and programs for 
joint night testing of a variety of 
V/STOL aircraft between ourselves 
and Germany, France and the United 
Kingdom. We each will get both data 
and flrst-han_d experience with air- 
craft that exist only in one country. 

S-o we see that our cooperation in 
the development of military aircraft 
so far takes place in scientific inter- 
change, in design studies, experi- 
mental fabrication, engineering de- 
sign and flight evaluation. 

The U.S. Ground Rules for Coopera- 
tion. 

These various types of cooperation 
are worked out to meet the objectives 
and criteria specified in the DOD di- 
rective referred to before. The main 
ones are these: 

First, for U.S. funds to be com- 
mitted, there must be a U.S. need for 
the particular project. I stress the 
word need here as contrasted to 
"requirement." What is meant is that 
there must be the same degree of 
firmness of application for a joint 
project that there is for a similar 
category of domestic project. The re- 
quired need varies from a technical 
need for an exploratory development 
project, to a hardware evaluation 
need for an advanced development 
project, to an approved military need 
for an engineering development proj- 
ect. The fact that a project will bo 
cooperative doesn't change our own 
RDT&E ground rules. 

Second, there must be adequate 
value to the United States in the 
project. These projects are not mili- 
tary assistance projects in any way 
and good business practice dictates 
that in these projects both we and 
our partner expect to get equivalent 
return. The only good contract any- 
where is one that is mutually profit- 
able. 

Third, funding for the project 
must come out of the regular RDT&E 
funds of a Military Department. There 
are no DOD funds for international 
programs. These projects must carry 
their own weight in competing within 
the Services for the service R&D 
dollars. 

Fourth, from jointly-funded proj- 
ects, the United States must obtain de- 
sign and production rights equivalent 
to those of U.S. projects. This mean? 
that on jointly-funded urojects we will 
end up with a complete technical data 
package and with the rights that are 
necessary to implement the produc- 
tion of it, For this, we agree to pay 
reasonable royalties on the back- 
ground work performed in the other 
country before the joint project, but 
all work that is done under joint 
funding gives us our normal royalty- 



free license to use the pfOj*-* ' , 
for our own defense pui""'* 
includes our usual right 
other contractors in the L~ 
as alternative sources of 
as we normally have tho 
up second source contrac ^ -, 
Fifth, and last, saleH *>!_ 
duct ion resulting from 
projects must remain * ,, , 
This is in keeping witli ^V 
McNamara's belief in an*' %v 
ward a common NAM/ 1 * * . ' 
market, based on the p i* * 1 1 t: , J J 
competition rather than Jtl 
and arrangement. 

Another important pror*<l lllt 
cooperation, not stated ii ^'^ 
directive, is industrial <ni>*l >i!IL 
meaning that the compolcMit. *; 
tors in each case must be ILI" '""' 
working cooperatively. No M 
elaborate and harmoniouH i-li t! 
mental agreement drawn n I* 
cooperative project, the pj't.l* ? *[' 
get off the ground unhv^H k" 
tractors agree to do but* i n * " i! 
their own governments HIM! (< 
in cooperation with the otH**** 
ment's contractor. We boll*? v* * ' 
usually should not be n pr>tl<: 
cause of the increasing rni(i 
terest in the U.S. imd I*' ll 
aerospace industries in joint- in 1 
ments and projects. An ymi 
several major U.S. firinn li***v<^ 
trial agreements with or (*vv t M s ft 
European firms from whii^li tn: 
tion can easily develop. ,S<'<-ium:i 
increasing number of j* '**.! *'< 
Europe are being done in t*oci|>i 
fashion. The most mttnf(fc i i*H n 
ample is that of the Brit Mid I 
cooperation on their suporHtui i c* 
port, the Concorde. Follow i i i|-r J 
pattern are the Anglo-I''r<*ji*li 
ccts for developing two n*?\v 
fighters, the Jaguar itiut Llit* 
And in the V/STOL (li-hl, < ;*- 
and Italy are currently ctc^vt; 
for operational use u 1 ij^vlit -^ 
V/STOL close-sup])ort I i ,,:'} t * I 
VAK-191R. Each of tlmtm |ir*i 4 
based upon industrial comj >nti t'i| 
Now let's take a closer lok n 
the lift engine project KU( ij*(U'n 
ground rules, 

Is there a U.S. uuccl fi 
advanced lift engine? Foi* n H 
inventory requirement at tliin 
the answer is no. For pniliii 

sign and component work ,. 
and size the engines that <* 
developed for use in V/iST( > I , J 
years from now, the aimwi* r i 

Is there value to the Un I 
in the cooperation? The u 
resounding yes. We should .., 
better engine and save a lot 
money. 

Will it be funded out O F . 
RDT&E funds? Yes, out of tJ ( 
Force advanced development, f^V) 

Will the United Stalcu tre 
sign and protluction rights ccitiMh 
to a U.S. development? Yea. tins < 
opment work will be ttpii i, j tfs 
Rolls-Royce and the U.S. c< 

(Continued inside 



Jcmuetry 



Changing Paltorni In Mcmaijoniont Tlioory 
(Continued from I'IIKC '!) 

courage the acceptance of authority 
by subordinate portion nol. Authority 
in more mcnninKful when it n'lalen 
to tin! individual 1 !! ability to build 
alliances within bin environment nnd 
to resolve eniilliclM within the or^ani/.- 
iit.ioa. 

Decision Malting in Weaponry 
Selection. 

In tho development and acquisition 
of weaponry, critical decinionn muni. 
lie made by (loverninent nnd indust- 
rial leaders, The decinion by Hie See- 
Hilary of Dcfemie to lie-in develop- 
ment and mihmtqucnt production of a 
tniijor weapon nynteni, U.K., a balllntic 
missile, involves force;! and faclom of 
extraordinary proportion)!. Involved 
in Hie acquisition of a weapon ny.'ilcm 
are a host of illverj'i'nt nclivilie:i 
mich as I'eiicarch, eiiKineeriiiK. tent, 
production, operational nnpnorl, etc., 
njl of which nre time plumed nvrr (lie 
life of lint [lynl.em. Tin- re;mll, in a 
inimaKorial activity involving; the 
ulilittntioa of human ami non human 
romnircen cxIondiiiK over several 
yi'iirn. 'i'ht' protracted develop- 
ment lime on our modern weapomi 

fiystemn ami the IHIK tiimiil.ii t of 

reni nirceil involved compound!! the 
rcnpomiibility of Hie decininn maker. 
Selection of u particular weapon nyn. 
tern today delerinlncn lo a law do- 
wive- tint batl.lefleid n!.ni1(>K.V thai will 
I" 1 employed In a future, war and. lo 
Home extent, our national mrurily, 
I'i'ciiiion nialunK in the development 
of wenpoim cncompnsnen man I fold 
factors of rout, lorhnolotfy, maMer 
W'heduliiui;, pniiliimilillit.y."ituiiiil it in- 
ability, reliahilily, an well an opera 
Initial miihtliililv in the intended 
operational I'livirninnent, Moreover. 
there in a critical interdependem-i' be- 
tween (he inilnntriaj and defmne par 
Uripaiiln involved in nucli decinionn. 

In thin complex nianaKeini'iil prob- 
lem are Hie rooln of the two major 
innovations in or cxlonsioim of tradi- 
tional manatrcmenl. theory dim'imned 
herein, i.e., /mi/re/ ;mum//< m. n/ and 
IwoxUmmvo twe of iitinnlihtfit'c nun 

Ijlinn for decinii inking. A project 

nwnaHomont ulrnHure in nuperini- 
I'oNcd upon the functional oi'(faniv,a 
Uon of the parent unit to provide 
point for Hut decision nnd 
phtiHCH of iminaReint'nl. The 
nature of Hn> nmniwmoiit fob in 
nrquiHitinn linn forced l)n< 
i>f project imuuiKeinenl 

. - nnd quantitative annlywir 

in a fnumnvitrk of traditional man 
iiK'-mcnt theory, 
theory and imtmiKitmenl 
provide a bunio Kiildn lo , 
"I'Kanixim* and eontrollhiK humn'ii 
"m non-Inimnii reHourci'H while tuia- 
lym and tlm accompanying um; ot 
"luantitnlive methods provide for ob- 
jectivity and tint wystematie itnd V\K~ 

cxamlnntion of H,,- nllenialiven 

which the maiittK^r hns to 
'. The truly mKiiincnnt reitult 
' thm relationship luia biten tin* 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



i'<;''"K"H.iiin that, the execution aspect* 
"I inuniir ( . m ,.,,t cannot be HojmrnU-d 
tn " HiuilyiiiH. A new breed of man- 
aiver haii |i,. ( . n crcatx-d ( ,,,,,(, ( , lu! 
flmlleiiKe l thin uni[|iie problem, one 
win, cinnbuH-M (lu; talents of Hut trmli- 

"' niannfvei- with those of the ana- 

lynt lo bitconiu the t,it<il wunaunr, 

'"P'll'le nf IlUa( .|(!n,p; the total maruW 

nicnl |nb! 

M i.'i ttuperlleial to view the Hchnolii 
"I timiitiKi'Mient introduced eacliei- an 
m-piirnle appn.achen to thit niaiiiiKe- 

""'" l Pi'otili- r an mivenil IVIH-H of 

iniumit.-ineMl. If they miitit be <lm- 
nitmi'd noiianilely at all, they Hhoiild 
In' viewed an ncKinentn of the iate- 
l-.rnted whole, lieftmcntji which coniple- 
"pn-nl ern-h ollu-r lo fullill that nmi- 
prebeaitive inaiiaivriiient philoMO|)hy 
required ,,f loday'n 



(lunntilntivc Anpccln of 

. 'I'lif central Iheine of the quantitii- 
live iie^MU'iil of iiianaKcmeiit in the 
iini- of a formal analylical framework 
in the dcchdon-nmlmiK procesji, mu- 
" III invotviiiK Hie line of ipmnLita- 
Hve inellmilit. H. i M ,,(, addressed to 

a pai-licular ty| f decision problem, 

i.''., that, lype which in predominantly 
''"'ireriied with variable;! which can 
lie quantified, but In miy type of prob- 
lem. Tin- |iroponea|;j ,',f qinial.il ative 
inelhoiiH are concerneil about Hid 
depth of aimlyiiin foi> ilecisioa innlunK 
and believe Hint, a sound basic ap- 
proach In the key (o (his depth of 
aimlviiin. They would impport (he view 
of llnroiil Kiiuiity. ttiioled earlier that 
Iheir iihlloHiqihy does not rttpresent 
n Nepiirale tyni- of management. They 
would aliio take hmue with (he "tools'" 
clii!i:iillcaliMii ,,f the Idean they repre- 
neiil. While it In I mr Hint' mathe- 
maticii niiirht. logically be viewed an 
Ibe tonl of the iwnlynt, Hie aaalylical 
aiqironcli lo clecinion making attvo- 
cnli-d by thin jfK'iip cannot be viewed 
[limply a:i a tool lo lie applied when 
Hint where Hie imimiKci' W'en 111. All- 
iilynin numt. become an integral part 
of ihi- mnnnjtemeat job, aatl the man- 
atfer inu.',I be, to iionu- extent, an 
aniilvnl, 

'1'hin In not to nav the manager 
nnmt, be a |irofen!ilonal mathciniitlolim 
in- operations renearcher. !lin knowi- 
cdire of their ari'iis need nut hit as 
evh'jijiivc an thoiie who upeciulixo in 
HUH pnifc.'iiilon. |li> does, itowevitr, 
nee.l a bsnic underslandiTiK of the 
logical prorense.4 involved, and Hie 
itbilily to nndersland and to torm- 
uhile the analytical structure for his 
own dci-isiim. (iiven thin level of com- 
petence, the imumKer can effectively 
ulili/f the professional analyst or op- 
eratiium refieavi'lier In his deciHion 
pi'oiVHH, (Inly if he can do this cJin 
lie n-allv iiurorpimitn analyHiH in 
depth Into ldn decislnn-nrnkliiK: proc- 
enii. AH Dr. KraneiH K. Hradnhaw, 
former prcHidrnt of llu^ Society for 
Advancement of ManuKcm.cn t, bus 
miiil: ".Most inanaffors would ratbor 
live with problem tliey can't solve 
Hum UN*' a Holulion they don't under- 
stand." The role of tho nwmwcr ia 
that of midcrslmulitiK nnd purtlclpat- 



!'"' V, 1 ,, 1 . 1 " 1 Illl!l . 1 y a 'fl for <l(^cisiori mak- 
iiiff. I his reiiuircB that be; be able to 
wimmuni(!iit(! with and utilize- the 
skills of tho professional analyst. 

Tint stnuiKent proponents of quan- 
analysts for management do- 
are nHHociattci witb orKaniza- 
wliich carry n mimljor of ( |lf- 
ierent titlos. Tho most popular aro 
uperatioiiH Uoticnpuh. Management 
hcicnco and Systenm Analysis. These 
terms do not have generally accepted 
ileliniLioas. It is possible to clmL-acter- 
J/.i' the primary areas of iaU;roat of 
UIOHO groups by e.minininfv tins ionr- 
carryintv UICSHR titl(!fl and' ob- 
K the activitioH of thon<! por- 
who practlco in those; fields. One 
will Ibid that in all of these ftaUta tho 
appriMKh to the division pro)>lcm is 
nicntical, only the omplmHlw IH dif- 
ferent A (tociHion is viowod as the 
jict of (iliooHinji; from nHornativcs 
liiinod on a prodiction of tho futuro 
wniHiKiucHccH nf oadi of the altorna- 
tivcH. Tins decision inakor nuist bo 
nlile to identify tho altmuitivcs opon 
l htm, mako a prodiction of tin; fu- 
tnnt roiittefiiienccfl of each nnd dulcr- 
mine a criterion upon which to Iwso 
his choice, if tlie problom \a very 
complex, a riijorouH analysis i <>- 
to tf"od ,1 



While Llui elomimtH of u decision 
problitm are allurnntivtm, predictions 
find criteria, it [ mildom that ono 
him available any oiin of tlmao olo- 
menlfi in its entirety. A cnniplotu lint 
nf nltitraativen open to an individual 
about to malat a decision would not 
only hi' impomiiblo, it would be iindo- 
iiirnhlo ad it would utinwinsmirlly com- 
plicate the decision mulii'iipr jn'occiss. 
fl in iiniially diminthlu tn havn tho 
nitt of potitdblo aHornativcR reduced 
lo a workable m/o by elimination from 
cmmideralioa all but Um numt likely 
clioiet'ii. IM-edintiim of the futurn con- 
iietiiience.H of alternatives involves tho 
inherent problems of predicting Wio 
fuLunt. Tint possibility of many out- 
coiuen alwayn exists for each iilterna- 
tive and, in many canon, ono in not 
even nblu to (fstimate with any doffrco 
of coiilldtmee Hid rliitivn llkullhond 
of the occurrence of any ono of tho 
pOHHllilo outcomes, If tho.'in comploxl- 
tiivt did not complicate tho decision 
makiM-'s world onoujfb. tins problom of 
ditterminiiiK a HIM* table criterion of 
choice certainly would. Ill von in a 
deterministic, world in which ono could 
predict with certainty the, outcome of 
each alternative, the criterion problem 
would be tt'oubUifiomt;. Kach outcome 
involves a cost (tho oxpemlituvft of 
returni-d'H In tho form of time, nffort, 
or maUtrial) an well EIH a number of 
desirablu and umlosirablo ofVoctB. 
KKtablisbiiif? a criterion for solcctJon 
from fluch a complex of outcomes in- 
volves mnkinjj value Judgments mid 
balancing; conilictiiiR 1 fyoals. It ia prob- 
ably because of tlicao comploxitics 
that tho operations researchers, the 
management Hcientitita and tho sya- 
toms analysta emphaaixc different aa- 
jiccta of tho problem. 



Operations researchers g have devel- 

oped into a *" yXn exam- 
! atica ,l y oriented j up Ai 

models tor real problems. _ 
s indicated by " 



3 J 

nrohlems The 

Sod A certain types of problems 
are examined in more detail, the lea- 
sons S examining particular models 
are given more emphasis. In genera*. 
H might be said that the practitioners 
of ma agement science are concerned 
with the'application at operj ^.ons re- 
search methodology to real woiJd 
problems, while operations research- 
ers are concerned with the develop- 
ment of or improvement of the meth- 
odology. . 

Systems analysis, as used in tnc 
defense industry, is almost completely 
problem oriented. E. S. Quade of the 
Rand Corporation defines systems 
analysis as: 

" . . inquiry to aid a decision 
maker choose a course of action 
by systematically investigating 
his proper objectives, comparing 
quantitatively where possible the 
costs, effectiveness and risks as- 
sociated with the alternative 
policies or strategies for achiev- 
ing them, and formulating addi- 
tional alternatives if those ex- 
amined are found wanting.'" 
Dr. Alain Enthoven, Assistant Sec- 
retary of Defense (Systems Anal- 
ysis), differentiates between opera- 
tions research and systems analysis 
in terms of the scope of the problem. 
Operations research, he describes as 
"optimization in the small" while sys- 
tems analysis is "optimisation in the 
large." 13 

It is apparent that all of these ac- 
tivities can enhance the managers 
decision-making ability. Many of the 
lower level managerial decisions, such 
as inventory control or office manage- 
ment can be formulated in such a way 
that operations research methodology 
can be applied directly. Other prob- 
lems, such as those met at the higher 
levels of Government are difficult, if 
not impossible, to formulate so to ap- 
ply such methodology, but can be 
treated from the point of view of tho 

u Quade, E, S., "Analysis for Mili- 
tary Decisions," R-387-PR, Nov. 19G4, 
The Rand Coloration, j). 4, 

ia Enthoven, Alain, "Systems Anal- 
ysis and the Navy, Naval Review, 
1965. 



18 



systems analyst. Other managerial de- 
cision problems lie in the spectrum m 
between and are appropriate lor 
quantitative analysis of some term. 
What these various approaches 
have in common, and what is most 
relevant to management decision mak- 
ing is- (1) a sensible approach to 
decision problems; (2) the use of a 
formal analytical framework; (3) the 
explicit statement of the criterion of 
choice or goals involved; and (4) a 
systematic comparison of the alterna- 
tives and a methodology for dealing 
with the risks and uncertainties al- 
ways involved in such problems. Ina 
use of a formal analytical structure 
requires that one look very carefully 
at the nature of the decision problem. 
Explicit statements must be matte 
about the relationships which exist 
(or are believed to exist) among the 
variables involved. One must differen- 
tiate between those variables over 
which he has control and those which 
are functions of forces external to Tus 
control. One of the most useful re- 
sults of such structuring is that it 
not only requires the decision maker 
to state what is known about the 
problem, but it also requires him to 
rocofiniw what he doets riot Know 
about it. 



An Example of Quantitative Analysis. 

Consider, for example, the. problem 
of deciding whether the Air Force 
should go ahead with plans for the 
development and production of a new 
transport aircraft, one which otters a 
distinct advantage over the presently 
UH1 aircraft in terms of speed, pay- 
load or some other operating advan- 
tage. To arrive at a sensible answer 
to this problem, the decision maker 
must obtain information about a mul- 
titude of relevant factors and deter- 
mine their proper bearing on the ( de- 
cision. Several significant questions 
are posed: How will the transport bo 
utilized? What would be the added 
transport capability resulting from 
the addition of such an aircraft to 
the transport fleet? What will he the 
impact on costs in the long run of the 
alternatives of developing or not de- 
veloping the proposed aircraft; When 
will this proposed aircraft bo avail- 
able, and what is the expected air- 
lift requirement for the same period/ 
These and many other pertinent fac- 
tors which have a bearing on the 
problem arc obviously not indepen- 
dent of one another, nor do they de- 
serve equal consideration. The vari- 
ables over which the decision maker 
has control, the specification for the 
aircraft design, the operating and 
maintenance policies, the number to 
be purchased, etc., all must be con- 
sidered in their many combinations 
simultaneously with the Possible 
values of the variables over which the 
decision maker has neither control 
nor exact knowledge. The actual re- 
quirements for airlift which will exist 
in tho future, the technological bottle- 
necks or breakthroughs which may 
occur, the costs which will accrue ami 
many other considerations complicate 
the decision maker's task, Obviously, 



the relationship among these vari- 
ables and the goals or objectives 
sought by the addition of the pro- 
posed transport aircraft to the fleet 
must be determined or estimated. 

Before the structure can be defined 
the decision maker must look care- 
fully at the goals or objectives be is 
seeking so as to determine a criterion 
which will allow him to select the 
best alternative. It is quite important 
that the criterion problem be looked 
at as a separate item in the decision 
process. In the first place, the estab- 
lishment of a criterion involves value 
judgments, i.e., the determination of 
the relative worth of the various out- 
comes. It is difficult, to separate value 
judgments necessary for the establish- 
ment of criteria from those judgments 
which relate to the prediction of the 
future consequences of alternative 
courses of action.* The former in- 
volves one's value system, his likes 
and dislikes, or his interpretation of 
the likes and dislikes of the American 
people. The latter involves only an 
objective estimate of future events. 
Moreover, it is difficult to distinguish 
between personal goals and organiza- 
tional or social goals, both of which 
influence value judgments, even when 
the structure of the problem forces 
explicit consideration of tho criterion 
problem separate from the prediction 
problem. It is nearly impossible for 
one to make such distinctions -when 
this aspect of the problem is not dealt 
with explicitly. 



Finally, the criteria or goals used 
in the decision-making process arc 
the crucial links which relate the de- 
cisions made at one level in an or- 
ganization to the remainder of tlie 
organization. Tho goals or criteria 
utilized by the Air Force in its de- 
cision-making process must ha com- 
patible with, and support the goals 
of, the Department of Defense and 
the entire Government. In other 
words, the criteria for decision must 
bo such that it measures the cuntri- 
bution of tho alternatives to our na- 
tional goals; this is indeed a most 
difficult task. Involved arc questions 
of utility, suboptimization, measures 
of effectiveness and cost. Explicit 
treatment of this aspect of tho prob- 
lem is essential to rational decision 
making. 

The question of criteria in our 
transport aircraft example is rela- 
tively simple when compared with the 
same aspect of decision problems re- 
lating to tactical aircraft or infantry 
weapons. The contribution made by 
transport aircraft can be measured in 
terms of quantity of payload and rate 
of delivery. Fortunately, these quail- 

*Note; A value judgment in (Ha 
example would be an estimate of m 
worth of havinff the additional capa- 
bility of the proposed aircraft. A pre 
dietwn judoment would estimate n 
way Buch an aireraft would perforr, 
in an emergency. 

January 196 



titles can be related to a military re- 
".requirement and comparisons can be 
made between a complete delivery sys- 
tem (ships, aircraft, prepositioned 
stocks) which contain this transport 
aircraft and the, complete delivery 
systems which do not contain this air- 
craft. It' we expect to accomplish the 
same mission in either case, an ob- 
vious criterion is the delivery system 
which costs the least. (It should be 
emphasised that this choice of cri- 
terion docs not imply that we arc 
looking Tor the least cost delivery sys- 
tem; we are looking for the least cost 
delivery system ^whick will perform 
I lie mitixionii assigned.) 



With criteria established, one can 
proceed to structure tin? problem in a 
} way which will allow for the com- 
parison of tho various alternatives. 
In our transport example, the alter- 
natives to be compared are a num- 
iier of delivery systems composed of 
different quantities of ships, aircraft, 
prepositioned stock, both with and 
without the proposed aircraft. Tho 
calculation of the number of each 
component of the sytoin required to 
do the job and the cost of such an 
alternative! requires a considerable 
amount of work. One advantage of 
having the decision problem formally 
structured is that theses calculations 
can be set up as routines; conse- 
quently, computers can be utilized to 
perform these menial tasks. Another 
advantage is that such a formal struc- 
ture allows one to observe tho general 
form of the problem and, perhaps, 
bring to boar some of the basic math- 
ematical theorems and greatly sim- 
plify the comparison of alternatives. 
Linear programming can bo utilized 
to examine an infinite number of 
alternatives and select from them one 
which meets the basic criterion, pro- 
vided, of course, that the problem can 
be structured as a series of linear 
expressions. It should be noted, In 
view of some of the criticisms of 
quantitative management, that it is in 
this area of comparing multiple alter- 
natives that mathematical methods 
and computers make their greatest 
direct contribution to tho decision ' 
i > maker. It is apparent that when used 
i in this way computers and mathe- 
matical techniques are only tools of 
the trade, not the major portion of. 
i the decision process. The really sig- 
nificant portion of the decision process 
is that of selecting the variables and 
relationships involved, and the struc- 
turing of the problem, the selection of 
! a criterion and, of most importance, 
| the handling of tho risks and uncer- 
tainties involved, This approach to 
' decision making would himlly be fea- 
1 sible without the availability of com- 
! puters and mathematical techniques 
which allow for the detailed compari- 
son of many alternatives. 

i r 

: The Itole of Uncertainty. 

Probably the most important aspect 

' of this approach to decision making 

* is that it emphasizes the careful con- 

sideration of the uncertainties and un- 



knowns involved in the problem, un- 
certainties which are inherent in any 
decision problem. By the very nature. 
of decisions, the decision maker is 
trying to control or manipulate tho 
future, and his decision is based on 
predictions about the future conse- 
quences of several courses of action. 
To fail to recognize this fact and to 
act as if one could predict tho future 
with accuracy would bn foolish. On 
tho other hand, one can point out^that 
the use of analysis depends entirely 
upon assumptions about the future 
and the results of the analysis enn 
be no better than the set of asmmip- 
tions upon which it is bused. IhiH, 
too, is true and it loaves the decision 
maker in a quandary. He needs to 
make a set of assumptions in order' 
to apply this approach; yet be cant 
possibly make the correct ones. It IM 
In this regard that the use, of th 
analytical approach is so valuable. 

Because he is working with an 
analytical structure, the decision 
maker can test the sensitivity of bin 
decision to changes in assumption. 
Suppose, for example, that in our 
analysis concerning the proposed 
transport aircraft, we are not nblo 
to determine, with any degree of cer- 
tainty, the quantity aucl rate of de- 
livery which wil 1 be required in a 
situation in which the transport fleet 
is to be utilized. It is very likely that 
this will indeed bo the case. The. 
amount of material delivered depends 
upon the type of military operation 
being supported, the location of the 
support required, the distance in- 
volved, the tactics employed, etc. The 
analyst can make comparisons ut fi 
number of specified loads and delivery 
schedules for u number of likoly 
scenarios." If it turns out that the 
proposed transport is n member of 
the most economical transport Hyslom 
for each of these comparisons, he 
can bo fairly confident that the deci- 
sion to go ahead with the program IB 
not sensitive to the mission, If, on 
the other hand, the proposed aircraft 
was included in the most economical 
transport system for only a few of 
such comparisons, he would know 
that his decision was sensitive to 
variations in mission. In such cases, 
he could either expend effort attempt- 
ing to determine with a higher decrees 
of certainty the missions require- 
ments, or he could examine the char- 
acteristics of the proposed aircraft to 
see if one with more favorable char- 
acteristics might bo feasible. Similar 
sensitivity analysis can be conducted 
to determine to which of the other 
areas of uncertainty the decision is 
sensitive. 

The Universal Requirement for 
J ml gin cut. 

The use of this approach to deci- 
sion making does not, of course, pro- 
vide ready made answers to tho deci- 

" Scenario is defined as an outline 
plan of the actions to be undertaken 
during a projected exercise or maneu- 
ver. 



sion maker. TCvon with 
analysis many un.-rrta.nUrM will yxih 
which havtt not been fully revived 
There are always some u!i]n'tji nl 
decision problems winch <:imin>L hu 
formally lnw'|>ruted into lhi l nna- 
IvtJcal framework. Nor m (.hen* uny 
completely *mtiBfae.t<ry nn-iimm! ol 
o(ri'ctlvnnHH for making cin]mrinonn 
limonj? the aHurimtivn. 3h.wrv.-r, llic 
iiBi! of an unulyniK provide n irrenl 
deal of inmtfht into the nul-iini ut 
the diMiinum problem. It roeinieii iiu 
teiition on tli important vnnableH 
and identifier this immH when- mibjee- 
tivc judgement in required, It iivonm 
the niixinK of relevant and irrelevant 
information and teudii l.n i cdiin' Ihf 
uminint of einutioimliimi involved in 



. 

Subjective judgments muul null mi 
made, bill IhiH approach imiimlnjsi 
UK; factcn-M to be. judged find l 'J!; : . irl V 
HlatoH what judgments! wen* utiU'/t'il 
in UK* tiulyi -lenvlritf lln-m lo lie 
ehulleiiKe.d nd defended if nenl t. 
The Hlrucliire of l.ne problem ullowsi 
tin individual who \i\ not n ^x|n>rL in 
nil aK|H:tn of tin- problem In inject, 
liiH jwlKmniil; in tho.'ie im-im wlu-r 
his expertiwn in valid wilhoiil jilleni|il 
Ing Lo n-lnle lo Hie ollmr fnrlotti 
about which IHH UnowledK" ' !l limited, 
It allows u HpiH-ialirtt. fur rsninplj', 
lo inuko judrmentH Imiiml on IhiH 
hnckKt'ciuncI in bin !tpi'riall,y wil-litnil 
liccominK involvcil in iiur.'Hhnm if 
fcttclmoloffy, coitt, or polilirn. lie In not 
riMiuircd to mnlcii rei'iinuiu'inliilioiiii HU 
to whether a riirluln wcnpnn filiotilcl 
IKI bimght or not (which iuiplien u 
(hmijiHin on liiu purl.) hut l fun-i-iiiil, 
the operjitioiml cinitH|iieut'i'!i of tin' 

UHl! (if MlK'll 11 WCflpUll. 

ThiH dimniHHion hiui itlwi'lteil nil the 
upplicutini] of quaiililutivi' unnlyntit 
for d(idnmnn ut lli IIIK!"'"' l*'Vrln ol' 
iniin|j;i!iin'nt, hut the nuim- apin-imrli 
t'jni he u]i]ilie<l to a lower h-vrl di-el- 
sion problem mi well. It limy be (hill 
(here tire fewer niH-erluintii'!! mid u 
ICHH elaborate aniilyniji iniiy In- nulH- 
tsimit. In iionir ru.'iesi tile prolilcm niny 
lui HO Hiniph' (hut (In- deeimon iiiuEcnr 
ran conduct tin udetpialu anulyniii with 
out roHnrtlnK to pencil usifl imper. (ir 
[lorhupH the {Minnciiiieiieeii nf i'hno;iliiM; 
a iui-opHoiial nlleriuiUvti nrc mil, itevl 
OUR uiuuiKli I" wurrunl u eoinprelifn- 
Hive iinalynin, nnd a ilcclnioii lumeil mi 
piiHt oxporiunt'i) alone niny 1 
lulotninte. But when (lit 1 coimc 
tu'e Herioim and thn prohleui (' 
it Ixihoovt'H a noi'd munnjtm* l. 
tho power of unnlynin. 

and IMlHconci'iilioiiH 



Invariably in a dinruninoii nf tliiw 
npproach to tho declnlim-nuiUIiiK proc- 
OHs of iniuinKenmnt u number of 
criticiBtrui tu-iHu. ThiH techniinu 1 , likn 
any other, him its Hhfiiie.omiiiKH hut 
ninny of tlicso crltlcinm ur. tiamnl on 



First s the thought Unit this u<l- 
vocatoa of quantitative miuuiKi'menil 
treat manujtemc-nt nn if it. wure n 
mathematical model waiting only fur 
tho mathoirmlicully oriented 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



to solve a set of equations or to per- 
form some esoteric algebraic opera- 
tion. Quantitative management is con- 
corned almost entirely with decision 
making; it hardly pretends to address 
it>/lf to the execution phases of man- 
agement, which are clearly a signifl- 
I'.int proportion of the manager's 
task. Moreover, the mathematics in- 
volved are used primarily as tools of 
tin 1 analyst. In many cases, little or 
no mathematics beyond simple arith- 
metic or elementary algebra is re- 
quired for analysis; emphasis is on 
the proper structuring of the problem 
for analysis, A solid background in 
mathematics can he extremely valu- 
able in even simple analysis, and may 
lead to the application of some valu- 
able mathematical technique or princi- 
ple; however, the manager need not 
'.'0 a mathematician. 

Another misconception about the 
use of quantitative analysis in man- 
agerial decision making is that it does 
not allow for judgment. This criti- 
cism has been particularly strong in 
regard to the use of systems analysis 
for decision making by the Secretary 
of Defense. The claim is that analysis 
has replaced military judgment in 
the formulation of our defense pos- 
ture. If military judgment has been 
fcxciuded from these matters, it is not 
because this approach does not pro- 
vide for he inclusion of such judg- 
ment. Indeed, analysis not only rl- 

? r TV h i nt . mi l itary J U( tent be ex- 
erci^d, hut sharpens the areas in 
which such judgment must be made. 
It tends to separate those factors in 
f 3ision problem in such a way that 
judgments can be made separately 
by experts, rather than requiring a 

n 



quently, for the analysis to be much 
more complete than would otherwise 
he possible. Viewing the computer as 
a decision maker, however, is com- 
pletely absurd. Computers can only 
perform routine calculations and then 
only after a programmer has care- 
fully provided instructions on every 
minute detail of the calculation pro- 
cedure. The extent of their decision- 
making capability is to distinguish 
between signs (+, , 0) and perform 
some clearly defined routine as the 
result of each. More important to thin 
argument, however, is the fact that 
the esseatial portion of this approach 
is the structuring of the decision 
problem and in the interpretation of 
results, neither of which involve tin; 
use of computers. The relative; im- 
portance of the computer in quantita- 
tive analysis is quite small. 

One other aspect of quantitative 
analysis for decision making which 
appears to be generally misunderstood 
is the use of cost effoctivenosn studies 
in the Department of Defense. There, 
is a tendency to equate cost e.fl'eetive- 
ness with a decision procedure which 
selects the cheapest system. Tins truth 
of the matter is that cost eflfactlvncHH 
studies, a particular form of quanti- 
tative analysis used throughout the 
Department of Defense, docs' not mean 
that at all. It means taking the; least 
cost alternative of thane alltn-Hatiwi 
whtch are equally effective. There i 
quite a difference in the two state- 
ments, and one would have great die- 



at KIU t thf struclimi and ilyni 
our industrial nud Defense 
The itmniitfor must innint 
pragmatism inut uNlinc the c 
tirniH of all tho st'hnolH in t 
.support tlu- maliini,' uml c-icco 
(U'c'ision.s in mi ('Nvmi 
risk and unctM'liiinly. 
nuuiL philosophy musl 
th(! I'hiiJiging palU-rns in 



KonnU, Humid ami Cyril O'J 
"Principles) of Mnniiffrmeiit/ 
draw-lUll Huoh <L!i>,,) lUflj. 
niivin, Ralph G., "The Kurichi 
of Top MiumKomtiHi," (Now 
Ilai'lii-i- & llroH.,) lilfil, 
Air ft'wu Afmntrtt l?fc -I, (M, 1! 
KnonU, Harold, "Nuking ft 

M:i(iMK'ini!iit TlH'iiry," 
'' 



-uKim 

Dnvis, fCeith, "llntnaii Itclnll 
Work" (Mrfimw-IliM Itnok Co., 
Clclanil, Mavfil I., "Tin- EYoJcd 



ftulli-tiu (May 
|-\, "Tbv 1'rac 
(Now York, Hn: 
lift m. ) 

Qiiiuici, K. H., "Anulywls far JI 

Decisions," li-,S87--l'l(, Nov. 156 

Kami (!i)f|)oi-:itiuii, 

KnthiivcH, Alula, "Hyjil^inw Ar 

'Hid Uii! Navy," Nnwtt Iti-vh \i', 



, and other factor 

simultaneously. It also helps to 
ri value l 



1 i . (! "r. 

is should not be interpreted as an 

over emphasis on cost, or as aligning 

f Iority , to cost and S(! >" (1 Ln 
r ie r 3 ' but of bnlancinj? coxt 
effectiveness, at least conceptu- 
al' i.t'Jl? 161 ^ aa ? 8 w hnt our military 
Sw S5 1 ] eade > sai.l all 

it atV I* 8 d ? m ;J ob ' bllt ll!t ' <'" 
t at the lowest cost." The difference 

theae WOTds * without 



This is GEEIA 

f<!oniiini(!cl I'lM 



9) 



f "ta2X,' ' *j $* 

SWAwffi? 

rrrr- 

such judgments would clLrlv iT y f JtS J b ^at we have outlined hen- 
i a 2 rou ! ,T That <* a pwcedur! one W* T M V is llot im W 

zssff&xssf ^-SffSftT- 

Another criticism based nn Io have some comS^^ t] J al Im 

option is that o LS mi8 , con - analinU R P ? y m ^"antitatlvo 
resultn i n i, 1 *. Quantitative analysis ,v! sl , s : tie cannot afford in ./in,,, 

tt ssrtrzS ttXs- s 
as^ts??^ S- SL a a*?^ "SSM 

9vses 

ions whict 
f manpower 
not 



a ereat 
if 

Me. The , J. 
Hlid for 
economical 



20 



manage- 



the me m 



Hhots ii ft to distil, rt'july lu rv, 
to any omorjroacy. Within a 
tinui, a fJJCKIA Uuun, or c-omliir 
of ton ma tailored to Hie pflrtfaulai 
can In- airhorni* onnmtr lo the 
!)!<! HjMil,, TltUMT can \t\\l tho 1 
on fa'l,(!, r!n<Iy tfi work, .^iHhji , 
Uii; rail Co i 1 hi>l|i. 

(JKMIA pliiws Hti'oriL' I'liiplin*: 

(!UHt<imor .saU.ifactifii!. Tfic c-iii-r: 

for whifili tl> work is Udnff i 

IIUH (linsct ju:c(WN to (In* cipjirotr 

CiI'!KIA r(, r i(ni or unil, C!K! 

stnvuH for ciistoini'] 1 niitrnfticli'/i 

iniiintuiniiif,' a ([uiolc rfdcliun cajj 

ity tn mm;!, ii)ntallnti(Hi iimi msr 

Miuicn reiniii'dtni'iU.s nuywli(-iv, i 

tinut. CiiHlomor Hiitiftfiiflinn h \ 

tuiiK-d !>y thi) i?liniinuti<ni uf tfoIJj'i 

injr ujid iislnff oU'-thc-KhiJf ils 

mulily nviiiJablu. At thf nuiie t": 

curronuy with Uio Intcst i!ev?'q 

meats in iho 0-K fiiHd in mnfnlsir' 

by taking on Rufllcfont mimbwMof il 

aioi-n difllciilt and nioiv ndvaM 

jobs, Thn cwatomor (iRKIA sp^.i 

of is rnpruflcntnil |jy nvcry w.'-: 

command of the, Atr Force. Th<H:> 

cludo Air Force Conimnuuiirafo 

Kcrvlco, KLrjitcjric Air Commsn-l, r 

Forco Systonia Coinmiind, Atr T-:s 

Logistics Command, Tnctic.iT Jti 

Command, USAF Security S^mi 

Headquarters, U.3AF, and ol3ie:i " 

Installations like tlic Chiy^r.e 
Mountain complex make CrKKlA con- 
fident that it can do ila job, atij 
timo, anywlioL-o, In the most piufw 
sional manner. 



January 



'Why Vietnam," a 32-minuto black 
1 white motion picture which out- 
is U.S. policy in that country, is 
v available for public non-profit 
wing. 

''he 16mm film ojiens with Presi- 
t Johnson's news conforonco stato- 
it to the nation of July 28, .1 !)(!&, 
elaborates on. tho basic points ho 
:ussed. Scenes from tho struggle in 
tiiam illustrate the various points 
Ic by the President. 

ecretiiry of State Dean Runic an<l 
ense Secretary Robert H. McNa- 
a are also featured in tho film, 
ch was prodnccid by Armed Forces 
mnntion and Education, Depavt- 
:t of Defense. 

rints of "Why Vietnam" can he 
owed by civilian organizations f rco 
harge. Requests should ho sent to 
Army Audio- Visual Support Gon- 
aup porting- tin; area in which you 

located (chock list below), 
ints may also bo purchaaod from 
.rt Film Laboratories, Inc.. 'Mb 
fc 55th Street, Now York, N.Y. 
my Audio-Visual Support Cunltirs 
i which the film can bo burrowed 

i'st Army Amtio-Vimml Support 

Center 

rt Qeorgo G. Mcndc, Md, 

JOB Code 301) (177-8844 

Jr<? Supported; Conn,, Del,. 

.Cy., Maine, Md., Mass., N.H., 

N-.J-, N.Y., Ohio, Pa., HI., Vt, 

^a. and W.Va. 

Ird Army AwHo-VImm! Support 
Center 

ft McPhorson, Ga. 

rca Code 404) 752-8905, wet. 

;40f) 

trco Supported; Ala., Win., Ga,, 
T.C., Miss,, S.O., and Ten n, 



Fourth Army Audio-Visual Support 
Center 

Fort Sam Houston, Tex. 

( .? GodG C12 > CA 2-1211, ext, 



Area Supported: Ark,, La., N.M., 

Okla. and Tex, 

Fifth Army Audio-Visual Support 
Center 

IfifiO Hyde Park Blvd., 
Chicago, 111. 

( A,' Codo 312) ID 2-fiOOO, ext. 
3440 

Area Supported: Colo,, III., I 1K L 



x"" - " 

b., N.D., S.D., Wis. and Wyo! 

Sixth Army Audio-Visual Support 
Center 

Presidio of San Francisco, Calif. 
( 41G) S0 i- 



Area Supported: Ariz., Calif., 
Idaho Mont., Nov., Ore., Utah 
and Wash, 

U8AKAL Army Audio-Visual Sun- 
port Center 

Fort Richardson, Alaska 
868-8209 
Area Supported: Alaska 

USAUPAC Army Audio- Visual 
Support Center 

Port Shatter, Hawaii 
803-203 

Arm Supported; Hawaii 

U.S. Army Audio- Visual Sun port 
Center 

Room (5A1072 

Tho Pentagon 

Washington, D.C. 

(Area Code 202) OXford RG320 

Area Supported : Washing ton, 

J.'.G. 



o Speakers 

(Continued from Pago 14) 

ras of the Air Force Systems 
Logistics Commands: 
alters j (At all fivo cities) 
i. Robert II. Charles, Asst. Sec- 
itai-y of the Air Force (Inatalla- 
ona & Logiaties). 
Gon. W. A. Dnvla, USAF, Vico- 



Marv l n C ' ^omlor, 
', Oommandor, Roacnrch & 
oloffy Div. (APSC). 
Gen. Jack J Catton, USAF, 
u., Operational Requirements & 
welopmcnt Plans, Hq., USAF. 
^Gen. Gerald F. Keeling, USAF, 

Production 
, 

Robert II. McCutchcon, 
u> ". Procurement 
1 Porco 



Procurement Conferences 
Set for Texas & Iowa 

Two procurement information con- 
ferences have been slated for Febru- 
7 in 131 Paso, Tex., and Council 
Bluffs, Iowa, to aid industry develop- 
ment. 

A Procurement Clinic, sponsored 
by tho El Paso Chamber of Com- 
merce, tho El Paso Board of Develop- 
ment and Industrial Development 
Corporation of El Paso, will be hold 
Feb. 10. 

A Procurement and Industrial De- 
velopment Conference will also be 
held Feb. 24 in Council Bluffs, Iowa, 

For information on the two con- 
ferences contact Donald Holinberg, 
Executive Vice President, Chamber of 
Commerce, P.O. Box 682, El Paeo. 
Tex., or William Roister, Box H, 
Council Bluffs, Iowa. 



Springfield Armory 
to be Phased Ouf 

Defense Secretary McNanmra has 
directed that all activities at the 
bpnng-field Armory in Massachusetts 
be phased out over the next two and a 
najt_ years in accordance with the 
original decision to close down the 
activity announced last year. 

The reafflrmatlon of the decision 
follows a comprehensive study by the 
Booz, Alen & Hamilton firm of man- 
agement consultants which concluded 
that Wip long-range retention of the 
fapringficld Armory for the acquisition 
o small firms and weapons systems is 
neither necessary nor desirable. 

The study further stated the Ar- 
mory a manu facturing capacity and 
development capability are not needed. 

AH in the case in similar inactiva- 
tiona of surplus facilities, all career 
employees whose jobs are eliminated 
will be offered another job oppor- 
tunity. If the new job requires a move 
to another location, tho moving ex- 
penses involved will be borne by the 
Government. The services of the DOD 
Offlcc of Economic Adjustment will be 
made available to the community, if 
requested. 



Executive Secretary 
of DJAC Appointed 

Clyde Bothmor, former Director of 
the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration's Office of Industrial 
Affairs, 1ms been selected ns Execu- 
tive Secretary of the Defense Indus- 
try Advisory Council. 

Bothmer succeeds Samuel W. Cros- 
by, who resigned from the position 
last September, 

The council was established in 
May 19G2, and has provided an im- 
portant forum for discussions by the 
Secretary of Defense and his prin- 
cipal management assistants with 
leaders selected from business and 
industry. 



se Industry Bulletin 



Amphibious Warfare 
Classified Briefing Set 

Amphibious warfare will bo th 
subject of n classified briefing for in- 
dustry sponsored by the Navy, Marine 
Corps and Electronic Industries As- 
sociation, March 1-3, 1965. 

'The meeting- will bo held at tho 
Naval Amphibious Base, Goronado. 
San Diego, Calif. For program secu- 
rity forms and pro-registration in- 
formation contact Mr, John Sodolski, 
Electronic Industries Association, 
2001 Eye St., N.W., Wash ngton. D.C 
2000G, (Area Code 202) G59~22do. 



2T 



January December 1965 

Articles and Speeches 
Subject Index 



Tille 



Pfi. Mon. 



PLANNING 

!. technological Challenge of the Next Ten 
o ax : s - Speech by Albert C. Hall __________ 20 Mar. 

' -A-ir Force Highlights DOD/NSI A Ad- 
vpucecl Planning Briefings __________________ IB Jul 

* - Highlights DOD/NSIA Advanced 

Brieflngs __________________________ 17 May 

Highlights DOD/NSIA Advanced 
rn. Briefings _________________________ 15 Jun 

1 1-StJHMARINE WARFARE 

the Navy's Anti-Submarine War- 
Systems Project. By Capt. Vincent P. 

3 Nov 



of $700 Million Provides Added In- 
Ht . 1VElriCc in Southeast Asia __________________ 3 Jun 

Tables for FY 1966 __________________ IV Feb 

Budget Highlights (Statement by Sec- 
r oJC Defense on FY 1966-70 Defense Pro- 
f ,K i"-m and 1966 Defense Budget) ____________ 1 Mar 

J-JiVir, UEJFENSE 

( ivil riefonse, Defense Industry Obligation ____ 9 May 

* . < > M 1VI H7 NEGATIONS 

V, ^Electronic Systems Division, Command- 

CJoiiti-ol-Cominunications. By Maj. Gon, John 
W. O'Neill, XJSAF _________________________ 4 Dec 

Glia.n$rmg Strategic Communications, By Lt. 

ii. Alfred D. Star-bird, USA ______________ 17 Sep 

Woi*lcl-~Wicle Communications "In Seconds." By 

Gen. Richard J. Meyer, USA __________ 6 Jun 

ACT AUDIT 

Contract Audit Agency Assumes Control 
c*T Contract Audit Operations ______________ 5 Sep 

CX> NT-It ACTING 

Clonti'ixet Definition, By J. W, Grodsky ________ 3 Aug 

l>ofoiifio Contract Administration Unified ------- 2 Apr 

1 in orovoinonts in Contracting Explained by AF's 

don. GoTrity _______________________________ 5 Jan 

IVFiHtrivy- Industrial Interface, The. Speech by Dr. 

Tlioiruia P. Cheatham _______________________ 15 Oct 

Two -Step Formal Advertising in the Navy. By 

11 Act in. J. J. Appleby, USN ________________ 3 Dec 

r:o,s F .r IWBDUCTION 

Two TmTtortant Types of Defense Savings Ex- 

pi rviiic;*:! ____________________________________ bk Feb 

OAT A. 

A.V* TWEnnaorement of Engineering Data. By Lt. 

Ool. William 0. Remihack, USAF ---------- 1 Apr 

DiitEt AcQuisition. Speech by Hon. Paul R. Igna- 
tius _________________________________________ I 

Ontft IVTEiiiagement Challenge, The. Speech by 

don. Tt. A. Schriever, USAF ________________ 18 Dec 

r>ivfct* System Tnfonnation Will Be Standardized 14 Feb 
xtn, System Infoiination Will Be Standardized 
( Oln/rlftcation) ----------- - ----------------- ib Mar 

Standardization Program Expects Bi^ 



Impact Data to he Reported by Con- 
____________________________________ if May 

Tt i flirts i Data. Speech, by John M. Malloy _____ 16 Aug 

OOCtTMBNTATION 

T>ocumentation Center Cuts Costs for 
yirms in R&D ______________________ 22 Apr 

Documents MaTldngs to Control Distri- 
liitiort Simplified --------------------------- 16 May 



Page identification.: If Inside front coven ib inside 
cover; bk back cover. 



Title PS- Ha 

INDUSTRIAL DEFENSE j 

Administration of DOD Industrial Defense Pro- 3 

gram Assigned to Army 19 Ocl 

The "SAWS" Corporation, Ideas-Plans-Programs 8 Sep < 
MANAGEMENT j 

Application of Management Skills Emphasized by j 

ICAF's Gen. Steele Ifi Hi] I 

Broader Use of Zero Defects Typo Programs En- % 

couraged bli h: *] 

Commodity Managers: Their Role in the Army's 

Supply System 12 Sb C 

DOD Establishes Program for Improved Man- j 

agement of Support Services G Ju 

Equipment Readiness: An Achilles Heel. By H, E. j; 

Witt 9 Ba 

Integrated Logistics Support. By Cdr. Frank N. ^ 

Worden, USN 22 f; 

Management Improvements Within the Naval Ma- 33 

terial Support Establishment 11 Oil 

Management in Army Materiel Command. By p 

Gen. Frank S. Besson, Jr., USA Uii A 

Management Skills Honed at Defense Weapons 

Systems Management Center. By Col. John P. C 

Harris, USAF 11 B; 

Management Trends in Defense Development find ]S 

Production. Speech by James W. Roach 13 A; 

Navy RDT&E Management Guide Available to p 

Industry. By D. S. Taylor 21 Ki 

Systems Effectiveness. Speech by VAdm. I. J. r> 

Galantin. USN _ 17 ft D 

Systems Effectiveness Concept, an RD Appraisal D 

Process. By Cdr. Keith SaTRcnt, USN 23 Ai 

MANPOWER T> 

DOD Program for Employment Stability. Speech EJ 

by Hon. Norman S, Paul 13 Ji 

Intelligence Culture Skill : Our Main Reliance. 3SJ 

By RAdm. Russell Kefauver, USN ; ~^ fi Ji 

Procurement Career Program Initiated for Mill- 1M 

tary and Civilian Personnel 19 ft 3SI 

Youth Opportunity Campaign Launched by Presi- 
dent S Jc IN 

MARKETING 

Army /Industry Information Program. Speech by 1 I 

A. Tyler Port 18 H r " 

Defense Market Place, The 1 ** 

Increased Dollar Returns Sought Through Mnr- __ 

ket Research of Surplus - 1)K w -t^J 

Military-Industry Interface, The. Speech by Dr. ' 

Thomas P. Cheatham, Jr. 1E&1PJ 

Navy Resale System, The. By RAdm. Charles A. J- i; 

Blick. SO, USN 1*^_ 

Prime Contract Awards by State FY 1963-64-05 22 (***' 

Top 60 R&D Contractors FY 1964 1Gj! -,- 

Top 100 Defense Contractors FY 1964 8Ji-l r 

Top 100 Defense Contractors FY 1965 6 fc 

MICROELECTRONICS ^ 

Microelectronics and the Systems Approach, By * * 

Capt. A. J. Stanziano, USN 4 J- * 

MILITARY EXPORTS 

American Business and U.S. Government Cooper- 
ate in $6 Billion Military Export Program . .. Ul 
A NATO Common Defense Market, Ey Henry 

J. Kuss, Jr. 

ASPR Changes Made to Assist Military Sales. 

By Peter Feigl 

Credit Financing for Military Exports. By Frnnk 

J Pedc 13 A' n 

Defense R&D Expands Work with Allies ... 

Military Exports Bring Big Returns _ 

Munitions Export Control and Security Policy 

Administration. By Joseph J. Lieblinpr _ 
Patents, Proprietary Rights and Military Ex- 
ports. By Ralph H. Jefferson 



Janoar/ 1**^ ; 



January December 1965 



T 't' PR. Mon. 
STOCKP1LK 
Disposal of Kxofi8es in National Stockpilo Ap- 
proved by OKI* ' ___ " 1C Apr 

]JCM:|) Ocean KiijrinotU'injr _ 7 Q C (. 

Dcwp HuhmorKoiKio Prosram, Nnvy Kicks" Off'I 1 Jnn 

IJtiOji tuibmurKoiiftt KOHCUO VoJiiclo 1 Sep 

Ii*atH on SlilALAH II ^ Mnv 

fol> l JVo,S Hn '" tho a a - "y CaptfLcwiVB. 



Title 



UKN 

OKUANIZATION ....... ......... ...... 

(< )IIH Atomic .Support; Affoney Streamlined for 
Urdium' Mll'deney ..... 



_ ___ _ 

Audit AKC7i7y"~AWmeH~~CoiY- 
triict Audit OpnrabioiiH .... ___ ___ fi g en 

KiiiitloiLH of tho IJnfimso Supply Agency.~S|)eech 

by VAdni i. Jiiwiph M. Ly| , UHN _ 17 Oct 

wlnr of 01,;,, of Ami. Secretary of DO/CHBQ 

{1'llhlK! AlVfllVH) 10 Tun 

IM,ANNIN(! .......................... ----- ....... 

A.rniy/r-ndiiKlry Information Program. Speech by 

A, Tylm- 1'oH ....... ..... ]8 

C;jiiuiKinw Army, Thn. Hy Maj. don. M. S. Davi- 

HOD, USA .. L 

sTavy Lmttf Jlmjjro IMmuunj? Information Avail- 

Sop 



ul]<( l,o ,SKin|.ini! ami 'IVrhnicnl Groups S) So 

'liiniiniK mid (JontrolUujf Major IJofcnso Pro- 
KmniH, Siiiiich by . Burlo G. Wheel nr ( UHA 11 Fc 



KCKUJHMMICN' 

J<TfniH<i Market I'lnise, Tho 

)*wulo|Hiioiil mid I'rodiuition of C-5A Aircraft 



cb 

1 Jan 



.... ....... .._ ........... . ........ 

Hfitskn Nnw SuppliorB ...... _ 2 Oct 

1 fTul.lv(i CinnptitiUun A Kisy to Oovnrnmont Pra- 

ttnntnuiiiU Ity Hohci-t II. Cluu'lcji - H Oct 

o Hyutnm, Tlui, Uy UAdm. Cluirloa A. 
Illicit, UKN ................................ J4 Dec 

HAD HI,uj(i>H of tlm Procin-erannt i'roccaa 1 Poll 

tiw Civil Wnrlut Aiithori/ation Llutod by U.S. 
Army (ItirpH of MiiR'iii^irH ....... 1(1 Dec 

(JuiKMipL PlnniwHl for C-HA Prn- 

fi Apr 



"HO.IKCT DKI'TNITION 

iiilimvmiioiit in l><>lihll!un f What Wo Want 

from Indtutlry. HptHtnti liy Hon. Paul H. Iffim- 



16 . Tan 
10 Jul 



........ ............ ....... .. .......... .. . 

'1)1* Utiimnu'tl: Hi>niinurn Siflnnhilcd to Rx plain 

<!lianifi'H . . .. ........... ............ . ............ 

'ItO.IKCT MANA(!KMMNT 

i-ojiirl, MuiniKi'iiUMit in tho U.S. Navy, By Gnpt. 

\V. (!. Moont, UMK .................................. ._.. 1 Jnl 

I'oiiviit Mmwfiw -Mim(jfi* Extraordinary. TJy 

Mnj. Duviil I, CJN-lnnd. UfiAP ...... ........... 1 ......... 1 May 

rJ!l MntiiiKiM-H, Ktiviil Material Suppori 13BUib- 

llHhnnmt ..................... ....... ....... ..... ....... 11 Jnl 

. Army MuLcriol (N)inmnnd I'rojcct Mannirflrn I'Vb 



nnnt Tor Aoroapaco Propulsion Test 
Hy \\v\s, ("Jon, T.oo V. Gossick, 
t/HAP ............. . ......... _. .......... ....... .... 8 Sop 

lie TT.S. Air Ktn-co Tntnmst in Advnnond Propul- 
Hion. Hy fJim. H. A. Scliriovor, USAP .............. 12 Jun 

lOf/IAHUJTV 

n?roH,m llol lability Oiiorationnl Systems Pro- 
ftrnm, tin?. By Oooi'fcn S. Pnratino ........ ......... . 10 Au# 

olinhllity- KiiVfitoni) of tho Spnco Age. By Maj. 
Gon. O. F. Knolinpr, USAP __________________________ Scp 

IflHUAIlCIT AND DKVRLOPMENT 
iv Forco H -D AcnniBition Process, The. liy lit. 
Col. N. Wan-on Graves, USAP - ........... ---------- 13 Sep 

nuy'a Accent nn HeohiR, The. By Lt, Gen. 
\Villium \V. Hide, Jr.. USA ____________________ 1 Doc 

Unfunded StudicH Profcrom Assistnnco Out- 
d ....... ,., ........................ ____________________ Apr 



Defense Documentation Center Cuts Costs for 
bmall Firms in R&D ___________ 

Dofeiiflp BAD Expands Work wIth"Alllea"_ 
Nitvy Long Range Planning Information Avail- 
v abl to Scientific and Technical Groups ______ 

& S L S,^ til iv cs of the p racuT G mcnt Process 
Navy RDT&E Management Guide Available to 
T Industry By D . S. Taylor ________ 

Reliability Study Results Available to Industry 

and Reflcnrch Organisations ____________ _ 

Research and Development Achieved by Unique 

Partnership at AF Flight Test Center. V 

Maj. Gen. Irving L. Branch, USAF ______ _ 

1 rends in Defense Research and Development. 

Speech by lion. Eugene G. Fubhn __________ 

Unsohcitod Proposals (Air Force) 

Unsolicited Proposals (Army) __ __________ ~__ 

Unsolicited Proposals (Navy) ________ ___! 

SAFETY 

Mission Safety 70, War on Federal Work Injuries 

Kiclced OiF by President Johnson __________ 

SECURITY 

])fenan Gontnict Administration to Administer 

Industrial .Security ___________________________ 

Foreign Visit Clearance Procedure Clarified ____ 

Munitions Export Control and Security Policy 

Administration. By Joseph J. Liebliiig ______ 

Uniform Guidance on Security Classification 

Guidance Issued ____________________________ 

SMALL 11USINESS 

1K)I) Pumids Active Program to Assist Small 

HiiflineKfi and Labor Surplus Areas ___________ 

IX) I ) Reports on Small Business Procurement 

July (id- January fifi ____________________________ 

i")OI> Report on Small Business Procurement 

July 64-April 05 _____________________________________ 

SPA OK 

Major Crossroads in the Space Program, By Maj. 

(Jon. Don U. Ostrander, USAF _________________ 

Military fjpaco Program 19(55-75. Speech Iw Dr. 

Albert 0. Hull ..... ..... _______________________________ 

HYSTKMS .EKKKCTIV13NESS 

Hystoms 1'lfToptiveness. Speech by VAdnu I. J. 
(lalantiii, USN ____________________________________ 

Tho SystfiniFi Effectiveness Concept, an R&D 
Appraisal Process, Hy Cdr. Keith N. Sargent, 
USN" .-... .......... _______ ..... ________________________________ 

THRTINff 

AMC Regnlalipn Outlines Industry's Use of 

Army Facilities for Testing ___________________ 

Uf!(]iiiromcnt Cor Acrospaeo Propulsion Test Fa- 

cilities, the. By Brig. Gen. Lee V. Gossick, 

USAP ___________________________________________ 

Research and Development Achieved by Unique 

Partnership at AF Flight Test Center. By 

Maj. Gen, Irving- L. Rranch, USAF ___________ 

UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS 

Guidelines for Developing & Submitting Unso- 

licited Proposals U.S. Air Force ------------ 

Guidelines for Developing & Submitting Unsolic- 

ited Proposals U.S. Army ------------------- 

Gtt idol hies for Developing & Submitting Unso- 

licited Proposals U.S. Navy ________________ 

VIKTNAM 

Appropriation of $700 Million Provides Added 
Insurance to U.S. Fighting Man in Southeast 



Changing Army, The. By Maj, Gen. M. S. Davi- 

aon, USA _________________________________ 

Chinese Communist Threat, The, Speech by Hon. 

Cyrus R. Vance --------------------------- 

Vietnam Buildup ---------------------------- 



PB. Mon, 

22 Apr 

17 Jan 

9 Sep 

1 Fob 

21 Nov 

13 Jul 

14 Nov 

10 Feb 
4 Jul 

3 May 

4 Jun 

3 Jul 

5 Fob 

18 Oct 

E Oct 

7 Feb 

9 Aug 
12 Apr 
14 Jul 

1 Jun 
IB Sep 

17 Dec 

23 Aug 

10 Apr 

3 Sep 

14 Nov 

4 Jul 

3 May 

4 Jun 

3 Jun 

1 Nov 

16 Nov 
1 Aug 



23 



January December 1965 



News Items 
Subject Index 



Pg. Mon. 



Title 

ADVANCE PLANNING 

Advance Planning Briefings Agenda Set by 
DOD-NSIA 10 Jan 

Advance Procurement Planning Marks First 

Year's End with Continued Money Savings __ ib Mai- 
Agenda DOD-NSIA Advanced Planning Briefings 12 Jan 
Classified Advanced Planning Briefings Scheduled 

by AWC 10 Jun 

DSA Makes Advance Procurement Information 

Available to Industry 11 Jun 

Unclassified 19GC Advanced Planning Briefings 

for Industry Scheduled by DOD if Nov 

ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY 

(ARPA) 

ARPA Selects Contractor for Project ALTAIR _ 20 Jun 

ARPA Selects Three Contractors for Materials 

Research Programs ib Apr 

Industry Expected to Benefit from ARPA 

Optical Grant Program if Mar 

ADVISORY GROUPS 

Ad Hoc Group to Study Navy Procurement 14 Jun 

Atlantic-Pacific Interoceanic Canal Study Com- 
mission Appointed ib Sep 

Knitwear Industry Advisory Committee Named 

by DSA 15 May 

LASER Advisory Group Formed bk Jan 

NSIA Establishes Ocean Science & Technology 

Committee 13 j u ] 

Vice Chairman, New Members Appointed to the 
Defense Science Board 22 Apr 



AWARDS 

AF Cites 17 Defense Contractors for ZD Efforts 
Dr. Hubertus Strughold Receives Aerospace 
Medical Award ___________________________ 21 

Memorial AwaSf "II 10 



9 Nov 

Jun 

Apr 



jp v 



Industry Reviews Stock Numbers Cross-Refer- 
encing _ -jo 

CIVIL DEFENSE 
i v !J E ef ,. en se Course Sponsored by OCD 6 Sen 

Civil Defense Offers Table Display _ __!_ in An- 

Industrial Civil Defense Mana g ement~Course 
uttered 

COMMUNICATIONS 

SYNCOM Communications Satellites 
ferred to DOD 

CONTRACTING 



21 Jul 



A 

g 



Air Force Awards Contract for Initial 



wars onract for Initial P 
Procurement 

X*CoS?act 
Announces Go-Ahead 



lll 



r 






Terminated 



ct 



if Dec 
if Oct 
20 Jan 



CONSTRUCTION 

Military Construction Bill Goes to Congress _. if Mar 



Title 



PR. Mon. 



COST REDUCTION 

President Johnson Commends Defense Contrac- 
tors for Cost Reduction _________________ ..... -.-_ ..... . 15 Maj 

President Johnson Honors Cost Reduction Con- 
tributors _______________ __ ___ _______ _ 2fi Aue 

DATA 

AF Pamphlet on SEED Program Available ..... 21 Sop 

Change to TD-1 Directory Available ......... . ........ 21 Oct 

Navy Data List Available _____ ..... ______ ............. 21 Oct 

New Program for Obtaining Blueprints An- 
nounced by AFLC ________________ ........ __________ if Aujf 

Technical Data Study Contract Awarded . ...... . . lik Aug 

Two Color Drawings to be Used by Army Engi- 
neers in Bid Proposals _____ ___ _ 21 Alls* 

DEFENSE INDUSTRY ADVISORY " 

COMMITTEE (DIAC) 

DIAC Meets to Hear Progress Reports .......... _ ........ L7 Jfln 

DOCUMENTS 

AFSC Documents Should be Obtained from 
Procuring Agency ____________________ ....... ............... |>k Mm 

DDC Documents Now Available in Microfilm , 1 Ren 
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

Cooperation in Equal Employment Program Cited 18 Aiif ' 
Mississippi Forms Assn. of Government Con- 
tractors _______________ in Tun 

EQUIPMENT ........ """ .................... 

DIPEC Expedites Contract Completion .. . A Jnn 

EXERCISES 

Exercise Polar Strike Scheduled ________ 20 Jan 

GLASS HANK ............ 

Hill AFB Gets National Glass Bank ...... _ 20 NOT 

INFORMATION EXCHANGE 

AMC Tests Industry Information Liaison Offices bk Ma 
Navy Sources of Industrial Information _ 20 Jw 

SEALAB II Report Will Be Feature of Navy's 
"Man-in-the-Sca" Symposium ...... ___________ bk DH 

Technical Thesaurus Planned by DOD to Broiulen 
Information Exchange _____ _ if J)^ 

INVENTORY UTILIZATION 

DSA Conducting Study To Improve Contractor 
Inventory Utilization ____ 12 No; 

Three Million Dollars in Residual Contract 
Property Distributed ______ 7 n w 

LOGISTICS " ..... ...... '"" ............ 

^S An no ! mccs AMA Plmso Out Plan ...... Ib Mu 

AFLC Establishes Five Long- Supply Afisets 

Offices __________________________ 2| (juj 

Committee of College Deans To Asaiat'ln Mnii- 

agmg DpD Logistics Training- Program ........ 20 NV 

n G y D0 . I J,Bibho8fraphy on Logistics Available bk Ftt 
ugrten AMA Assumes Manag-emeiit of Mdnu to- 

man I ___________ __ _ _ jjt Off 

Phase Out Continues at Mobile" A.MA ...................... 9 Nm 

ban Bernardino AMA Phase Out Announced" ' 21 JIB 
Three Army Missiles To Be Maintained by 

Anniston Army Depot _____ * n> w n , 

MANAGEMENT ........ ~ .......... " ..... 

Army qmcers Receive Outstanding: Mmiagomcnt 
iraming ------------------ __ |Q 

Comprehensive Study To Bo Made" "of "all" DOD 
Hospitals in U.S. 



22 



vS? T g pie .ntation Courses OfforaT to "industry """" 13 Oc! ' 
Va D ^ e D Engineering Specialists To Be Added to 

MANPOWER' ~ ' - u Jul J 

Civilians to Replace Military in Non-Comlrotnnt 



Jobs 



.. 1 Ocl 



at 



24 



.. 

Technicians Available to Industry' _ JnJ 

Youth Job Program Working Well in" DOD"::: bk Jill 



- - i w * n 

January-December 1965 



K. Mo n . 



.. 'Iv<w, Dollars 
Nudoai """ 



TUlo 



'' B ' M i MIUTAKY KXPOKTH 

U.S./Itnliiui AHT<'I>IIH'II( on M-(iO Tnnlt I'mdiu- N ..._.. 

*'" tion i i' 'Nuclear WtNipoiin r-'D'ocfij TiT' 

W Miii U.S./IUC. ARC ic-iil. SiKiie.l r.r Joint l.jfi '"' i J'''"' 11 '/ 11 !' V, 11 " 01 '" 111 ^'" Avai'labh? 

"" Kiifiino j.i. Mli% , ".^'invti in (a>inj)|)utor f-'inld 

Mu| U.S/U.K. Plan .loinl lirv.-lupin.Mil ol' Ailva.m. "' " ' " 



Pff. MOM, 

-- r 26 Nov 



18 Au E 



op MUHKIJ" 

J Or| National Armed Kmvni Mum>um I'litntinl 
^ Oc| ORGANIZATION 

''" ..... ul {m ^> [ 



- , . 

' " Vlltwt 



m court 



May 



Peb 



vittnl 
Jfin CAK JtttKion Tu Mi 



.. 

11 



CAK JtttKion Tu Me KiihililiMliril in l)fi|ln!i 

(Jol. K. A, Hciirlwk, I IS A I- 1 . N-w ASI'K ( 'Imirmfm 

Diiti'Dlt (.AH Kt'Kinn I'ltiliililiiihrit 



, 



Visit 



21 J U ] 



Mt'lenru|iiinil .'liitelliln 



Nmv 



ir ,) 



,,, ln 



I'll 1 , Jim. 
Olllcii of An 



ib Sep 

if Apr 
2 Jan 



if Sop 



21 



Fair Announcod":.Z 21 Jan 



IJIllrii of A|(itiil(irifiri Slmlii") l-'urtiii-d 11 i '' 

llfc mii,iiiir u !ii Ati - *"- "- 



IllUlj;' 1 'I 1 ' 1 Worll > Kinnll HiiHinooH Coundl 







il'ility for Mi 
I IK;., A Knmll HushiOHs 
or Small 



8 Nov 



8 Nov 



........... ............ "" 



!) No 
iil Jur 



if ,lut 
11 .fun 



; ni( ' l "- (t '" ( '"t Clinic Hot for Halt I 



rocurttmont Oonforoncn Sot!! 20 AUK 
"'-HB.Hpocjnlifit _ 20 An? 



..-,- 22 Aug 
25 Dec 



10 J " r A on!!. '' : " l '" llliHl11 '" I.VMIK" Muni .Sy. t fn,, I'n.Mi'u.i, S "!"!' ' lllHi " |l H Wrkiihd]i ""To "ilc" Held In' Phila- 

"lIKJu ^ ""H'l'i'i (tt'llI'MR 

S1!I)B Col, liimkli, Jli.,,,1 (. , , vll,,, ','.' '"'' 

III (M Go.,. N,,|, r ,,| V( ,. ,,, M),,;,, 1 ,.;,',,,,,,^,,,. , ,,,, Jlr|p _ ' Apr 
H ^^m. P A '''.' i 'r IN ^ 11 '' VAlr '"*" 

..asA'KWF 1 '" ' -- 

^SSP 1 "^ 1 ^ 1 "'" 



ltk 



11 Sop 

, , ., ln "^nnu|( 10 |i(! J.'iei(l HI 1'Jlllll- 

si'KAi'iVATroNH ' " 20 Sop 

Ht'diiction in Hulwcrlptloji Iluta, Military SDOCS 

ami Hljmdimls n N OV 

Kt|NOHitry for (Iiinccllcd Hpcciftcutiojis"Eatab- 

mJJfc'J'y I)01) '" 1'liiladolphln go j un 

T KM I Nd 

Army TnHthift- Foam IiiHitlatod Containers _ . 2fi Nov 

Army^lisHlH CarRO Triirwfcr Platform 24 AUR 

i Oovciu 1'roductlon Testing _..__ 10 " 

4 



k M ow Analy HiH H 

Indu.try Bulletin 



at Wrlght- 



bk Nov 




DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



Contracts of 1,000,000 and over 
awarded during the month of Decem- 
ber 1965: 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

2 Standard Oil Co. of Calif., San Francisco. 
51,860,000. 13,088,100 gallons of RP-1 
rocket fuel. Defense Fuel Supply Center, 
Alexandria, Va. 

Blue Star Foods, Inc., Council Bluffs, 
Iowa. 1,052,262. 3.218,080 cans of ham- 
burger patties. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

3 Delta Petroleum Co., New Orleans. 2,710>- 
102. 6,318,372 Ballons of lubricating oil 
for aircraft engines. Defense Fuel Supply 
Canter, Alexandria, Va. 

7 Pacific Mills Division of BurliiiKton In- 
dustries Halifax, Vs. 51,083,400. 470,00-0 
yards of wool gabardine cloth. Reeford, 
N.C. and Clarksville, Va. Defense Person- 
nel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
J. P. Stevens, Inc., New York City. 
$1,805,260. 436,000 yarila of wool gabar- 
dine cloth. S utti liter and Wallace, S.C. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

8 Univac Division of Suerry Rand Corp., 
Washington, D.C. $1,G-71,760. Datii pro- 
ceosaing equipment. Washington, D.C. De- 
fense Construction Supply Center, Colum- 
bus, Ohio. 

Southern Athletic Co., Knoxville, Tenn. 
51,376,320. 1-17,200 men's light-weight 
raincoats. Knoxville. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 
13 Coastal Slates Petrochemical Co., Houston, 
Tex. $4.864,234. 1,100,000 bnrrela of type 
I, motor gasoline (30/0 octane). Defense 
Fuel Supply Center, Alexandria, Va. 
14 Southern Athletic Co., Knoxville, Tonn, 
51,586,853. 261,040 men's nylon sateen field 
coats. Knoxville. Defense Personnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia. 
Oscar Mnyer and Co., Madison, W!B. 
$1,713,262. -073,500 pounds of canned sliced 
bacon, Madtaon. Defense Personnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia. 

16 DeRossi & Son Co., Vineland, N.J. ?1,9B7.- 
600. 160,000 men's wool serge coats. 
Vineland . Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

Turalnl & Co., Vinclnnd, N.J. $1,044,000. 
75,000 men's wool serge coats. Vinelaml. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Pliiln- 
delphia. 

IB Cherubino Petti & Co., Atlantic City, N.J. 
$1,788,600. 80,000 men's wool coats. 
Atlantic City. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia, 

17 American Oil Co., Chicago. 2,206,816. 
500,000 barrels of octane gasoline. Defense 
Fuel Supply Ce-nter, Alexandria, Va. 
21 Tennessee Overall Co., Tullahoma, Tenn. 
$1,086,565, BOS.BOO men's cotton poly- 
estorone twill trousers. Tiillahpma, Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
22 A.M. Ellin Hosiery Co., Philadelphia. 
$1,155,040, 1,600,000 pairs of men'a socks. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

23 Inffcrsoll Products Division, Bore-Warner 
Corp., Chicago. $1,872,000. 400,000 soldiers' 
steel helmets. Chicago, Defense Pc-raonnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 
Coastal S tut en Petrochemical Co., Houston, 
Tex. 51,970,640, 610,000 barrels of dleael 
fuel. Houston. Defense Fuel Supply 
Center, Alexandria, Vn. 

i7 -Bonham Wife. Co., Bonham, Tex. $2,008,. 
106. 360,000 men's cotton poplin wind- 
resistant coata. Bonham. Defense Person- 
nel Support Center, Philadelphia, 
Supreme Mfg. Co., Dallas, N.C. $1,464,481. 
3,071,769 men's cre-w-neck undcrahirts. 
Dallas, Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia, 

Southern Packaging and Storage Co., 
Greenville. Tenn. $1,310,104. 3,014,626 
cases of individual combnt meals. Green- 
ville, Tenn. and Mullina S.C. Defense Per- 



sonnel Support Center (Chicago Subsistence 
Regional Office). 

20 AddUon Shoe Corp., Wynne, Ark. $1,836,- 
000. 250,000 pairs of combat boots. Wynne. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

H. II. Brown Shoe Co., Worcester, Mass. 
$1,089,200 140,000 pairs of combat boots. 
Worcester. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

Safety First Shoe Co., Nashville, Tenn. 
51,048,123. 233,280 pairs of combat boots. 
Huntsville, Ala. Defense Personnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia, 

Snortivolt Shoe Co., Nashua, N.H. 
$1.101,000. 160,000 pairs of combat boots. 
Newport, N.H, Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

Kaiser Steel Corp., Fabricating Div., 
Fontana, Calif., 510,551,940. 46,000 landing 
mat sets. Fontana. Defense Construction 
Supply Center, Columbus, Ohio. 

Republic Steel Corp., Manufacturing Div., 
YoungHlown, Ohio. $6,084,160. 26,000 
landing mat sets. Youngstown. Defense 
Construction Supply Center, Columbua, 
Ohio. 

J. B. Hoerig and Co., Division of Charles 
Pfizer and Co., New York City. $1,244,073. 
629,776 bottles of tetracycline hydroehloride 
tablets. New York City, Defense Person- 
nel Support Center, Philadelphia. 



ARMY 

1 Research Analysis Corp., McLean, Va. 
31,240,000. Military operations research. 
McLean. Defense Supply Service, Washing- 
ton, D.C. 

Laboratory for Electronics, Inc., Boston, 
Mass. $3,194,000. Airborne receivers for 
UII-1 and CH-47 helicopters. Danvers, 
Mass. Army Electronics Command, Phila- 
delphia. 

Wilkinson Mfjr, Co., Fort Calhoun, Neb. 
$1,842,800. Ordnance items. Fort Calhoun. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Jollet, III. __ 

REDM, Wayne, N.J. $1,870,000. Ordnance. 
Wayne. Ammunition Procurement & Sup- 
ply Agency, Joliet, III. 

l.D. Precision Components Corp., Jamaica, 
N.Y. $1,708,000. Ordnance items. Gadaden, 
Ala. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Action MfB. Co., Philadelphia. 1,883,600. 
Ordnance. Philadelphia. Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, Joliet, III. 

Columbus Milpar, Columbus, Ohio. $1.800,- 
300. Ordnance items. Columbus. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 
III. 

General Tiro & Rubber Co., Akron, Ohio. 
$1,112,788. Ordnance Hems. Akron. Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joliet, III. 

General Instrument Corp., Chicopee, Mass, 
$2,307,062. Ordnance items. Jollet. 111. 
and Chicopee. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

2 W. R. GrimBhaw Construction Co., Hous- 
ton, Tex. $1,772,000 (NASA funds). Con- 
struction at the technical services facility 
at the Manned Spacecraft Center, Clear- 
lake, Tex. Engineer Dint., Fort Worth, 
Tex. 

3 Mino Safety Appliances Co., Pittsburgh, 
Pa. $1,200,807. Items for chemical agent 
detector kits, refill kits and clips. Pitts- 
burgh. Edgewood Arsenal, Md. 

Cooperweld Steel Co., Glnssport, Pa. $6,- 
742,270. Wire mesh fabric and forms for 
the Mississippi River and Tributaries Pro- 
ject. Glassport. Engineer Dist., Memphis, 
Tenn. 

Magnavox Co., Urbana, 111. $6,641,432. 

Gun direction computers. "Urban a. Frank - 

ford Arsenal, Philadelphia. 

International Harvester Co,, Washington, 

D.C. $1,768,761. Tractor trucks. Fort 



Wayne, Ind. Army Tn 
Center, Warren, Mich. 
6 -Troop Bros., Coral Cables, 
Work on Central and S 
Flood Control Project, Da 
Engineer Dist., Jacksonvill 
Arundel Corp., Baltimore, 
Work on Central and S 
Flood Control Project in 
Martin counties. Engineer 
vllle, Fla. 

University of Michigan, A 
$1,320,000. Design, dovelo 
computer program service 
Defense Supply Service, V 
Douglas Aircraft, Snnta. 
52,450,000. Work on a cl 
project. Santa Monica.. 
Command, Huntsville, Ala. 
SCM Corp., Deerileld, 111. 
typewriter sets and roi 
mltter teletypewriters. I 
Electronics Command, Ph.: 
7 Colt, Inc., Hartford, Ci 
5.5flmm rifles. Hartford. 
Command, Rock Island, 111 
R. G. LeTourneaii, Inc., 
$1,198,420. Ordnance iti 
Ammunition Procuremei 
Agency, Joliet, 111. 
8 Kaiser Jeep Corp., Toledo, 
2% -ton trucks. South Bel 
Purpose Vehicle Project M 
Mich. 

Raytheon Co., Lexington, 1 
Development of self-pr 
modification to the HAW* 
Bedford, Mass. Army M 
Redstone Arsenal, Hun lav 
D- General Motors, Detriot, 1 
B-cylinder dieael engines. 
Tank Automotive Center, 
-Harrington & Richardson, 
Mass. $1,345,733. 7.C2rr 
and two seta of final insiH 
Worcester. Army Wea] 
Rock Island, 111. 
Delong Corp., New York 
Delong pier approach and 
accessory equipment. N 
Army Mobility Equlpmi 
Louis. 

10 Standard Products Co., 
$5.105.0SO. Rubber truck 
for M113 vehicles. Porl 
Army Tank Automotive 
Mich. 

FMC Corp., Charleston, W 

Rubber track shoo unser 

vehicles. Charleston. At 

motive Center, Warren, M 

Firestone Tire & Rubber I 

$3,OGO,505. Rubber track 

for M113 vehicles. Nobles 

Tank Automotive Center. 

Cook Construction Co., 

$1,100,073. Work on the . 

Jackson, Mississippi, Loo 

tlon Project. Engineer D 

Stewart-Erickson Co,, Soi 

770,807. Work on the I 

Renewal Project, A no' 

Engineer Dist., Anchoragi 

Hercules Construction C 

$1,651,901. Work on St. ] 

Protection Project. En[ 

Louis. 

Raven Industries, Sioux F 
000. Ordnance Itema. S 
munition Procurement & 
Joltet, III. 

Olln Mnthicson Chemical 
111. $1,806,712. $1,863,743 
20 and 7.G2mm ca.rtrii 
Frankford Arsenal, Philei 
13 General Motors, Detroit. ' 
cylinder engines for t 
8-inch howitzer, the self- 
gun and the recovery 
Army Tank Automotive 
Mich. 

Electronic Assistance Cor 
$6,223,276. Radio reco 
Army Electronics Comim 



26 



Ji 



Terminal CmiHlrnrllon Corp., Wnnd-KiilKO, 
N..I. $H.r>lW,0(H). Conutrmaltm of iroon 
lionnInK and Mii].|iortlmr fai!llitl(!H ni Fort 
His, N.,1. HtiKlnwr I) Int., Now York City. 

--J..I. Krlldi A (In., Dnllmi Tux. gw.llHl.lMO. 
("(Hiiif t'lli'Uiin nf live tn<!l,I<!(i] (>t|iii|i]n<>lit 
nh(t|i.'i, mill fiiflHl It'u. nt Korl. Hiiod, 'IVx. 
Knnfiii'1'r IHitl., Fort. Win-Ill, Tex. 

limitation, Inc., Mi'llmm-no, Kin, jl, 1)1)11, 4H7, 

Mitt i>ll Hi) fiim inn nlrnlliiim Icriiiiiuiln (AN/ 
TSC M) MA UK' IV. Mi'llmurne, Army 
Hli-i-lronlt'M ('oirimanil, Kurt Moninmilh, 
N-.J. 

It. (J. I. tiT mini fit ii. I in-,, I,miKvli!W, Tex. 
SS,fi7!l,'M(l. nnlmiiici' Hi-inn. I.nnwvlow. 
AtniminiUoii rrtii'iiromi'iil & Himiily 
AinsiNTy, .l"Hi'l, III. 

Honeywell, Inr,, Ilnnltlim, Minn. $2,0 IK,- 
HUH, Onlniiiirii Iti'inn, Nrw lli'Milon, Minn. 
Aiiiinunitiiiji I'l'iu'iii-i'ini'iit & Himi'lv 
AKfin-y, Jiillt'1, III. 

i llvmllx <'<ir|i,, Ti'lrrlim-n, "N.J. IfHUMH.IIVO, 
(iiililiuii-i' & i'iinli-i)l i-rnniHincnln Tin 1 llni 
I'HUMHim; nilmill.- nyiil.i'iti. Ti'tm-liiirn, 
Army Mlimili' I'onimiind, IlmiliiviUo, Alti, 

l.i'tu'ral Motors ('urn,, A'llliiiin IHv., Wiir- 
I'l-n, Mlt-k. Sr/.IIUI.im. rimtlmiallun () f 
1'iiiiMH. Ill, MM Kill! Muhi Kaltli? TiinU 
Duvi'lni ..... >ni I'l-nimtm. Milwriiilii!!', Win. ; 
Drlrnll, M Irli. n ml Win-run. Army Tnnli 
Aiiliiniiilill<> IVnliT, WnlTi'n, Midi. 
Ili'tidlx Cuni., Ynrli, l'n. $7.1!():!,1)7li. 
Oi-ilnu ...... Hfirtit. V Hi-It. Ilin-i-y Diamond 

l,lllll.NlloHf;l, \Vm\lllllnlim, ]),(], 

(Inner nl Miilnni Corp., Ddi-iill. f :i,l!lill,HIit. 
.'llH-i'vllmli-i- illi-m-l I'MKlniNi. Diilnilt. Army 
'I'n nli A n In unit I vi' Oi'iitcr, Win-mi. Mich. 
. Ih'mili'H J'liwdt'i- Co., Wilmington, I><-1. 
SUtltil.lin. I'niiii-lliinlii nnil [ipol'iUlinm iintl 
inriinli-iiiim-i'. I.iiwri-in-i-, Kim, Ammiiiiltlnn 
I'rni-iii'unii'MI M .'Innnly Ani'tit-y, .'Inllist, III. 
ItnvMi.'.in Cii., l,<<\liiiili>n. MIUIH. $1,073,1)7!!. 
HAWK lli'M iH-rvli-n ilnt'miK'iiliil.lmi iliiritiu 
I-'Y 'HI. Aiiiliivi-v. Mitnii, Army Mliinllu 
rtimmimil, lliiiihivlllt', Alii, 
Merry Cimiilriirtlim Cti., Mi-i-nhir, III. $1,- 
IIIIII..IKII. WurK i>n Ulii'lhyvllli'. lli'tii'i-volr, 

111., l'i-i,,|m"l. Kimllit'i-i- Dlitl.., HI. T.miltt, 

Flri'iiloni' 'J'lfc A Hnliln'i- Co., Alinm, Oliin. 
84,fi!l'Mi:ilt. TliTu for InmltJi nnil Ivnllcrii. 
Iti-i-iifur, 111. nnil I 'oil n( own. I'n. Ai'iny 
Tunis A ii I ....... hi IK Hi'iiliT, Wiinvn. Mli-li, 

MniiHllelil Tin- A Itnhlirv Co., MmmlU'liI, 
Ollin. ?l f IH)JI,)IH'J. ThTu f.n- <}i-(iiM triirliu 
nnil Inilli-rn. Mnnnl|i>lil. Army Tmik Aiiln- 
wnllv.' (Vn1ii', Wnri'i'ii, Mli-li, 
/rnllti Hnilln Ciini,, Clili'imn, :!.()|)(I.;!IH), 
HH'iinhiil I'lunii'iil in-iDkhntty fnwii. Clili-mtn. 
I 1 It'll Miiny Ai'in-iiiil, Unvi'r, N.J. 
{ii'litniil Motiirn, IHi'iii'l l>'ii|[lni' IHv., 
I>n1ritll. {EI.IIVI.IIIlO. U!ll iniili l-|nlr| ..... <' Mill 

KW iii'iioniln]' iiciii. Ili'iniH. Army Mn- 
lillllv l':i|iil|ii>ii>nt. Ci<nli>r, KL l.iuiin. 

Itiiiiiison Cn,, T,<-iii|[ti>u, Mnim. ui, inn, nun, 

(li'lt'i'lt'i! ili'inn nt iinniinl i>il]>])tirl. v'llll))- 
imnil fin 1 tilt' HAWK IIilunlli' H.viiU'in. 
WiiHliiiiu mill Amliivnr, Mi ...... Army Mhi- 

nilc Ciiiniiiiiiiil, Iliiiilnvlllr, A In, 
Knicritun ICIi-chli' ('., Ml., l.nulit. $H,(1'J7.- 
HUH, Mi']ll'ii|i<i<i' iiiilimliri.i llclnii, Ml. Iiiinln. 
Army Wi-upniiii Cniumiinil, Iturk tuliinil, 
III. 

Ilnrvry Aliiiiiliiiini Co.. Turriuu'i', (lullf. 
Sl.,V'.!ll,IVIil. I'lt'.H'ii iintl fir/n hiinrii inil'lu. 
Tnrniiii'i', l-'i'miltfnnl Avm-nril. I'liilmtcliililii, 
I.Viifriil Mtcctrh', Niiulivllli), '1'enti. Stt.lilB.- 
'lift. lli'Mlirii. iiiiunifiirlnri!, tll Ivory nnil 
Iniidillnlliiri n! II Ki'iii'rulnt'ii for tin 1 (!nnloll 
Hull Hutu. DfiilKii X- iiiarnifm't.livc will lit' 
tlimi- ut Hchi'iii'i'liuly, N,Y. ami Wnyin-n- 
Imrih, Vu. Di'llvcry nn.l [iniUiIlaLlmi will 
I"* 1 In Hii' Cumln'Huiiil Klvor I'ruji'i'l, TOMII. 
I'liildiU'i'i' Dint., Niiiilivlllt', Ti'iin, 
I'.iH'H Inf.. IInrirt.nl, Cntin. $l,Hfi(i,nri(). 
It.-l'fHc ]ULi-lH fur Mill iintl XM HI I'll (1.5(1 in MI 
I'lllrii, tliii'lfiinl Army Wi-upniiii Oominitml, 
Uwtt ItiUinil. III. 

ltd! HcllroiUtr Cn., nivlnlim of Itull Aero- 
ninn'i- llnrii.. l-'ni-t Wnrlli. Tox, $1.!I7S!.II1H 
nnil e-l,70ll,7KI. Iditiir l.lnilo iiHHcmblloH fur 
HII I lii'lIiTi].li'i-u. Furl Wiii'tli. Army 
AvfiHl.in IMiiiiM'ii-l Cnmmiinil. Ht. T<ouln. 
Kluro (in., Ht. r.niiln. $11,1147,1117. Hlfinim 
''tii-ii'l'litc <"rint'ii, Ml, [.ixilii. Ammunition 
I'l-unirenii'iil. & Hui'iily AnnTicy, Juliet, 111. 
Urilnii (turMito ('nrp., ('uinuimov I'riKliictH 
IHv.. Ni-w Yi.rk lllty. ?l,()a7.41B. Dry cell 
luiLUivlcji (mil Iiii'.llcnl niilln H(H, Now York 
C'Uy. Army KliTtrtmlni lUimmnnd, I'HIla- 



Mil IntliiNlrkN, Cnn-dllUni, Tox. $1.- 
uaU.DlKI. mill liiilMnn utility Irui'liH. 
("urndlliiTi. Army Tmik Aulomotivo Center, 
Warren, Midi. 



Continental Motors, MimkcBon, Mich, 54,- 
riU,!!S!0, KuBlne iiKHumlily nnd conncctiiiR 
liiirlii fur li'iuiNinlHiilunB iiHnil on the MflOAl 
luiik. MiiHkoHim. Army Tnnk Automotive 
Conter, Wnri-cn, Mich. 

Hdl IldlrtiDle.r Co., Division of Hell Aero- 
itpiiRt! Coi'ii,, Koy t WiH-lh, Tex. $1,270,288. 
Cissi- IKJX nuiicmblltii fur UII-l licllcoDtui-H, 
l-'ort Win-Ill. Army Avlnlloii MnloHol Cfini- 
miiml, St., Louifi, 

-AHHiiclnleil Hiirlns Corp., Wiilliico names 
IHv., Hrl.il.ll, Conn. $1.318,471). 20mm 
link ciirtriilKu liiillit. Krnnkfiiril Araonnl, 
Vhlliuliaplilu. 

MnhnwU Itulilipr Co., Akron, Olifo. $1,OGS,- 
20(1. !J ',!.-( dti IriH'k tirea, Akron. Army 
Tnnk AniiiTiiiitlvo (k'nlnr, Wnri-cn, Mluh, 
-I'ln-Hloni! Tire ft Rubber Co., Alteon, Ohio, 
SH.lKfUHO. 3"/M-tn truck tiros. Aknm. 
Army Tim It Antoiiintlvd Cimtut-, Wnrre.n, 
M it'll. 

I.IK'H CiniHtrilrllon Co., MonlKiimury, Aln, 
SI.Vrill.O'H). f!iinntnmUoti of iiirnicn'H dnrml- 
lin-ii!!! nnil illniiiK luill nt Mnt-nill AFI!, 
l-'ln, KiwinciT Dint., Jnnlmmivlllc, l-'ln. 
Ihiltlii'H Tool Co., Alronifl IHv,, CnlviM- 
Clly, Calif. SS.Hfifl.KBO. TU .fifiA (IVimnry 
Ti-iihnu 1 ) hclicDpteni, Culver City, Army 
Aviation MutoHi'l ('oniiniiml, Kt, 1-HUiin. 
KIH Corn.. Cincinnati, Ohio. Sl,lr>.U7:i. 
M'12!) fiiK mol.nl imrlH. Cliuiinmitl. Am- 
mnnilion I'rorure.nie.nt & Kum>ly Aitency, 
.lolUil., III. 

--fllliliH Mfjc. Co., Jtinenvllk'. Win. $1,147,- 
HllH. M-r,i!l fns-.i! mi'liil imrlii. JnnoHvllln. 
AmmnnllioTi I'nic.ui-omoiil ft Hupply 
Ahti'ncy, Jullitl, 111. 

AVCO Cori)., OriliiiniKii Hiv., Hidiinnnd, 
[ml, $1,!MI),<IH7. M'll!n fnw lin-tal |inrl. 
lUflnnoTnl. Ammnnidnn I'cacuromcnl nnd 
Kni'plV AKi'ntry, Jolint, 111, 
Iliiiiilltnn Watch Cii., Fmm-iiatur, T'H. $1,- 
IMI.Hlit, M '!!!!) fnv.e niotnl iiiu-lti. Tiiincnnter. 
Aniiiiiiiiil Ion I'voiinvenieiit anil Kupply 
Awency, Juliet, 111, 

f7ciit>ral Tlnui ('urn., Wnalclns lllv., I.n 
Malli', III. Sl,!UB,4an, M-iaa fn/,o mi'tiil 
iniflii, I,n Sulli.'. Aiiininnlllon Pronnrc- 
mont iintl .Supply Ane.tify, .lollel. 111. 
WeHli.rn HliH-lrlt 1 . N.iw Ynrk Hlty. $02,- 
H 1-1.7111. NllCFi-X vr-iicnroli ami duvoliip- 
mi-ril. IltirllnKliin, N.C, ; Wliinlnn-HiiUiKi, 
N.C.; Alli'iilnwii. I'n.; Croi'iiiilnirfi, N.C, ; 
nnil I.mmtlilnlc, Tn. NIKH-X Trdjimt 0111- 
i'er. Iteilitlone Ariiiinal, llnnliwllli 1 , Alii. 
Hell I[i'llrii]itcr DivlNlon of Hell Acronimrc 
CnriK, l-'in-t Win-Hi, TOM. 5:1,550,1172 and 
?l.Hl>ri,l)in. Iti.lnry wlntt hidden for till 1 
helit'i)p(t>rn ami (nil liiiiim niiiii'tnhllc!i fur 
1III I hellfonlent, Fort Wiirtli. Army 
Avlntlnn Maloriel Coiiiinanil, SI. Tmnlii, Mn, 
Honeywell, Inr., Uopklnn, Minn. $2,'JH!).- 
lini!. MKIil fnw metnl inirln. New ItrlKlilnii, 
Minn, Aniiiiiinitlnn I'nu'iirt'inriit. A .Snpiily 
Aiieni'.v, .Inliet, III. 

Knlnor Alunilniini Si Chomlcnl Hnli'H Dlv., 
Dnklitinl. Cullf. j:>r>,(lH4,<IHH. MX Itt iilnml- 
innn lioni'yrnmli t'nro alniliiii^ tiuulliiK 
in-ilii, tlti'liuli'v anil Hun Dli'ttti, Calif. 
A vin v Kmtlnoi-i- Wiili'i-wavn Kxpiii-lnniitt 

Hliillun, Vlrltiilini'tt, Ml 

Fonl Motor Co., Doarlmrn, Mich. Sa,B77,. 
(KM. Carry-all, eantn nnd iiani'l trnnliH. 
Ui'iirlun-ii. Army Tank AnKminHvi! (.Junior, 
Wnn-L-n, Mli-li. 

Itayinond KnitlnecrliifT I, nlinrn lories, Mlildk'- 
town, Cmin. ?l,tlOi!,i:il. M-tH (M'M imi'lrt. 
Mlililii't'iwn. Harry Diamond I.nliiiniUirli'H, 
WattllliiKli.il, !).(!. 

I'nriiniiH MfR & Hlnmiilntr Co., Cin-dova, 
Tumi. ?l,l!aft,Bl)0. Onlnnnco llcmn. Cor- 
dnva. Ammunition I'ronuromont & Su]inly 
Ancnoy. JnHol, III. 

Aincrlcnn [' nlir kilted I'roihietH Co., Inili- 
ana|)i)liii. $!,'.!! -1 ,3ai(. Ordnaiu'c Uoinn. 
Inilliinriinillii. Ammnnltlnn 1'nmiiremimt ft 
Supply AKL'iK'i', Jnllut, 111. 
-Iluyllicon Co,, LoxlnKton, MHHH. $-I,OGB,Oi)7. 
Miilnloiiane.o nnd modllicntlon (if Hpccial 
tniiliiiK and lent coiiipmcnt to Hiipiiot't the 
HAWK mlHHili! wyatom. LexiiiKtiin. Army 
MlBHllo tJoinmanil, Hunlnvlllo, Aln. 
- liny til con Co., LexinKtnn, Maaa. S4,Gfl3,lfiH. 
KY 1118(i indnatrlnl onitlnccrlnB aorvlccn for 
tin? HAWK nilHHlle ayiitem. LRxliiKtim. 
Army Miimilc Cdtnniaiid, Hiintftvlllo, Ala. 
FMC Corp., Kan Jnai?, Calif. $1,4<4,4B2. 
Ordnance itonid. Snn JIIHC. PIcntinny 
A menu], Dover, H.J. 

-Honeywell, Inc., Honklns, Minn, $1,024,- 
(1011. Iti'Hcnrclt and development of claaai- 
Hod ammunition. Honkim, Ticalinny 
Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 

Jolmson Furnnco Co., Ilcllcvue, Ohio. $1,- 
438,010. W-ton trnilora and trailer chiumln. 



BellDVue. Army TnnTt Automotive Center, 
Wai-rea, Mich. 

(Jcncral Molora, Chevrolet Motor Dlv., 
Detroit. SU,5HI,1G4. VftrloiiB tynca of 
commercial trucks. Detroit, Army Tnnk 
Automotive C liter, Warren, Mich. 

--Wnftncr Electric Co., St. Louis. $3.125,240. 
-i. 2-Inch mortar projectile iinrls. Ht. Lou In. 
Ammunition I'rociiromimt & Supply 
Agency, Jolfut, III. 

Kennedy Vnn Sniin (Inrp., Banvllle, Pn, 
SI, 1)1)11,280. 4.2-int:h niortnr projectile parts. 
Danville. AtnimiulUoii I'rccin-otneiit & 
Hiigiply Ak'L'ntsy, JnlEoL, 111. 
International HarvcHtcr Co,, WniiliiciKton, 
D.C. SI ,(115,6-12. Various model Iruehn. 
Fort Wayne, Tntl. Army Tank Automotive 
Center, Wai-ron, Midi. 

'-llnll Aonmyfitonii! Cc., nivlslon nf Hell 
Acroaimce Cor]v., ItuETalo, N.Y. ?],0-!J7,OflO. 
l ( ;\]i]ol'utory iluvuloimiotit nf nil IntlivUhial 
lift di!vlt- Hynti?m. llnlTuld, N,Y, nnil 
Widliul I.nlii}, Midi. Ai-mv Avlalim Mu- 
tcrlnl Com in u i id, St. 1-tiiiin, 
{Jfnornl Klcelrlc Co., MlHHlIo & Arinnmoiit 
Diipl., llnrtiiuctdii, Vt. $;U3-J.liH6. Oril- 
imiiRi! HcniB. Hiirllnnlon. Army Wennoiia 
Coiniimni!, Honk iHlnnil, 111. 

"Mni-tin /arliry ConNtruvtnTH. Honolulu, 
Iliiwail. s:t,;!M,linn. CnnHLniPlloa of NIKE- 
HKUN, NIKH-X riiitl I'ltKMH (I'ncHlci It.anwo 
I'lUiiitrnnniKiHiLlii Sfttniituffi Htndy) f[icl]lll(!N 
at Kwajnltiln Atcill, Mrsviitiult In]iiuils, 
ICnidnuor Dint., Honolulu. 
WfHtrcx ConinuinlrntldiiH Division of Litton 
ByHtems, Ine,, New Itnnlidle, N.Y. $6,020,- 
li-17, Radio t.rniiniltti*r rind i-cccivlnw 
I'inilimieiit. Piiilinni Hnnor, N,Y. Army 
KloiiLronloH Ciiiniiiruiil, rlillmlelnhla. 

-- -1'lillro Corp., Nowpnrl Hwicli, Cnllf. $71,- 
Itiia.flflO. KY IfifiO prndiiPLInn nf lllfl 
KIIH.I.KLAdH minllt( nyitleni. I,.iiwiula1i!, 
Calif. Army Mlwille CDinmnnd, lliintHvllli;, 
Aln. 

Kby & AiiHiiclnlcji of ArkmiHnu, Winlillft, 
Kan, S14,211t,!l(i(t. Work m I,oi:k nnd Dnm 
#11, ArkarmiiH Illver rrojinit, MnrrlHnn, 
Ark. Entilm-ei- Dint., I.ltllc Honk, Ark, 
CollliiH llmllo Co.. DnHaii, Tox. SB,l)'1ft,2tl. 
Iifin linn mlnrownvts Hyjitoin for tlio 
Iti'pulilln of Koren Army nnd Kiironn 
Mlnlnlry nf f!iiiinni!ri1t-ul hum, Dnllnti and 
Hli-harilfina, Tox. Army Kli-ntvontcii Com- 
mand, Kurt Moiimniilh, N.J. 
ITT (ilinilnn, Inc., J. ( MI AiiKdlon. $1,0!i<M)0(l. 
(iriiiind rndnr iictn. liim AiiKfilc*. Army 
KIcftlroiilfH {'omininnl, Fort Mtmmmith. 
N.J, 

Pliltt-o Corp., N!wiuirt Iloatili, Oalif. SH,- 
ItUl.liOl, AiliMitntinn nf a djintlinuil i|innillty 
of llm KIIILt.KI.ACH niimillcH to fill! Mntn 
Hdllli 1 Tank. Nowimrt lU'nch. Army 
Himlliwi'iil l*rotmrenn'til Ant'iiy, I'limirloiiH, 
Calif. 

Corp., N-w])i)i-l HtMKtli, Calif. $7,- 
HIUIJ.KLACIT itiduntrlnl iml- 
iniei-hiK iiniUHirt. Niiwimi't lli'iicli. Ai'iny 
Hmithwi'Hl I*r<iuiiM!ii'iit AKiiimy, I'linntlwm, 
Calif. 

- fioncral Miitom, Cliovrolct Dlv., nplrtilt. 
SI,444,4HH. -IXa Jirhonl ImiHiii. Hlr-linunid. 
Ind. and (Joiuvuy, Ark. Army Tank Autn- 
mntivi) Cmitoi', Wnn-on, !MIuli. 

Intvrnntlonal Hnrv4-flt*r Co., WanhlriKton. 
!),<;. S!i,3(i3,HUO, Viiriinni nlv.cn oC Imntiir 
diinni Irimltn. Fort Wayne, Inil. mid 
H]n-lnllold. Oliln. Army Tnnk Aiiliimotivii 
Ci!tiU-r, Win-rim, Mich. 

-(ioncrnl Motor*, Olievnilol, IHv., Detroit. 
S-t.HH,(13(l. Hlnko nnd |liitfnri ti-nkn. 
llallimoro, Mil. and Ht, Ijimln. Army Tnnk 
Aiitoniullve Center, Wnrroii, Mich. 

-Tntornatlnnnl IlnrvoHtnr Co,, Wimliiiurlnn, 
D.ti. S1,H70,RII3, ficluidl Iniiicii. Illrliiiumtl, 
Ind. Army Tnnk AulOTiinllvc Onleir, 
Wiiri-nii, Mich. 

General Moln-rn, Ohovrnlnt l>lv., Delrolt. 
5fi,017,-til2. -t-doin- (suloinnliilo Hpilinm. Ilox- 
woud Hoad, Do!. Army Tnult AiilomoLlvo 
(!cntcr, Wiii-ron. Mtcli. 

I'BPO Corp., Momplili!, Ti'iin. $2,102,ft-iH. 
Aorlnl pholoflnsh n-iu-lrtdKcs. Mcmuhl. 
Army Ammunltlnn Procuroinont & Hnjiiily 
AKfinuy, Jitllat, 111. 

-Amron Corn., Wsuikmilin, "Win. $l, r )OR,iri'1. 
-lOnim cartrlilKO enHoit. Wnulipnno. Army 
Ammunition ProctirumnnL St Slnjitily 
ARcncy, .Tollot, 111. 

Ilulovn Wntcli Cm., Jncfeflon Ileliilila, N.Y. 
81,282,088. M-l2n flints mot nl pnrtH. Jncltiion 
Hotfthla. Army Am munition Prncnromont 
& Supply Attenny, JolEot, lit, 
Aincsenrch Mfg. Co., Division of tlio 
Gnn-ett Corp., TOl ScKundo, CullE. $1,077,- 
29U. OOKW KOB turbine; generator aoto. 



Dofaiuo industry Bulletin 



27 



Fl Sesundo. Calif, nnd Phoenix, Ariz. 
Army Mobility Equipment Center, St. 

Eagle' Enginterintt Mfg. Co., Louisville, 
Ky. $2,792.803. 3KW, 60-cycle, AC nir- 
cooletl generator seta. Louisville. Army 
Mobility Equipment Center, St. Louis. 



NAVY 

2 Farmer Tool Co., Denver. Colo. J2.701,. 
SDO Nozzle nnd fin assemblies for 2. 75- 
inch rockets. Denver. Navy Ships Ports 
Control Center, Mechaniesburg. Pa. 
Applied Science Industries, Fnlb Church, 
Va $1,863.000. Nozzle and fin assemblies 
for 2.75-incb rockets. Falls Church. Navy 
Ships Ports Control Center, Mechanics- 

Miincie < Gear Co., Huncie, Ind. SG.303.8IG. 
2.75-inch rocket nozzle end fin assemblies, 
Muneie. Navy Ships Parts Control Center, 

Mochanicsburg, Pa. 

a Sperry Hand Corp., Great Neck, N.Y. $12,- 
263,103. Prototype sonar system kits. 
Great Neck. Bureau of Ships. 
Admiral Corp., Chicago, SI. 165,000. Classi- 
fied electronics equipment. Chicago. Bureau 
of Ships. _. 

(Jartelt Corp., AiResearch Mfg. Co. Div., 
Torranee, Calif. $1,376,000. Computers for 
F-4B aircraft. Torrance. Navy Aviation 
Supply Office, Philadelphia. 
6~Defoe Shipbuilding Co., Bny City, Mich. 
$4,182,392. Construction of a small survey- 
ing ship (ACS). Bay City. Bureau of 
Ships. 

7 general Instruments, Inc., Hicksvllle, N.Y. 
$1,249,873. Classified electronics equip- 
ment. Hicksvllle. Bureau of Ships. 
Hnber, Hunt and Nichols, Inc., Santa 
Clara, Calif. 514,060,000. Construction of 
a 660-bed hospital at the Naval Hospital, 
Oakland, Calif. Dir., Western Div., Bureau 
of Yards and Docks. 

Douglas Aircraft, Long Beach, Calif. $2,- 
892,606. Counter measure seta. Long 
Beach. Bureau of Naval Weapons. 
PHD Electronics, Inc., Westbury, N.Y. 
$1,439,000. PY 66 research & development 
on VAST (Versatile Avionics Shop Test 
Equipment) . Westbury. Bureau of 
Weapons. 

North American Aviation, Inc., McGregor, 
Tex. $6,363.026. Rocket motors for Spar- 
row and Shrike missiles. McGregor. 
Bureau of Naval Weapons. 
Raytheon Co., Lexington, Mass. i3,716,636. 
Airborne radar sets for the Navy and 
Air Force. Bristol, Tenn and Waltham, 
Mass. Bureau of Naval Weapons. 
Western Electric Co., New York City. 
$1,298,010. Engineering services on the 
TERRIER, TARTAR and TALOS missile 
systems. New York City. Bureau of Naval 
Weapons. 

8 It. D. Lambert and Sons, Norfolk, Va. 
$1,474.333. Construction of a technical 
training building at the Fleet Training 
Center, Norfolk, Va. Dir.. Atlantic Div,, 
Bureau of Yards and Docks. 
Texas Instruments, Inc., Dallas, Tex. $2,- 
189,306. Classified submarine equipment. 
Dallas. Bureau at Ships. 
Hawaiian Dredging and Construction Co., 
Honolulu, Hawaii. $1,919,000. Construc- 
tion of a Pacific Fleet Tactical Range at 
Kauai Island, Hawaii. Officer in Charge 
of Construction, Mid-Pacific Div., Bureau 
of Yarda and Docks. 

9 Universal Match Corp., Ferguson, Mo. $9,- 
119,701. ASROC launchers. Ferguson. 
Navy Purchasing Office, Washington, D.C. 
10 M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass. $3,000,000. Tacti- 
cal engineering support for POLARIS 
guidance systems. Cambridge. Special 
Projects Office. 

General Precision, Inc., Binghampton, N.Y. 
$3,823,657. Production units ot the F-4D 
weapon system training seta. Binghampton. 
Naval Training Device Center, Port Wash- 
ington, N,Y. 

11 -Bethlehem Steel Co., San Francisco. 
$2,438,960. Activation of the tank landing 
ship USS JENNINGS COUNTY (LST-846), 
San Francisco. Industrial Manager, 
Twelfth Naval District. 

Pacific Ship Repair Co., San Francisco. 
$1,776,000. Activation of the tank land- 
ing shin USS HUNTERDON COUNTY 
(LST-838). San Francisco. Industrial 
Manager, Twelfth Naval District. 
13 American Metal Fabricators Co., Bristol, 
Pa. $1,272,803. Steel pallets for bomb 
storing and shipping. Bristol. Navy Ships 



Pnrta Control Center Median I csburg, P. 

Sanders Associates, Nashua, N.H. $3,36Z,- 
724 Evaluation and repair of government 
owned electronic equipment. Nashua. 
Bureau of Naval Weapons. 

u North American Aviation, Columbus, Ohio. 
17 632 000 T-2B BUCKEYE aircraft. 
Columbus.' Bureau of Naval Weapons, 

ITT Gilfillan, Inc., Los Angeles. ?Z,114,uw. 
Service teat model radar set, repair parts 
and engineering services. Los Angeles. 
Bureau of Ships. 

16-Lear Siegler, Inc., Anaheim, Calif. *1.789,. 
1G8, Anti-submarine warfare instrumenta- 
tion system. Anaheim. Navy Purchasing 
Office, Los Angeles. 

17 General Electric, Schenectady, N.Y. $2,- 
050,000. Design and furnish reactor plant 
equipment for naval nuclear powered 
whips. Schenectady. Bureau of Ships. 

Master Mfg. Co., Hutchmson, Kan. $2 - 
095,000. Ordnance production line equip- 
ment Hutchinson. Navy Air Engineering 
Center, Philadelphia. 

Sperry Gyroscope Co., Syosset, N.Y. 51,- 
850 000. Development of instrumentation & 
control subsystem for the nuclear powered 
deep Bubmei-Eency research and ocean 
engineering vehicle (NE-1). Syossot. 
Special Projects Office. 

General Instrument, Inc., Hicksville, N.Y. 
$3,148,050. Classified electronics equipment. 
Hicksville. Bureau of Ships. 

WestinghouKC Electric Corp., Washington, 
D C. $3,740,8BB. Steam turbine generator 
sets for naval ships. Sunnyvale, Calif. 
Bureau of Ships. 

20 Gyrodyne Company of America, St. James, 
N.Y. SI, 000, 000. Long lead time items for 
QH-50D helicopters. St. James. Bureau 
of Naval Weapons. 

21 RCA, Camden, N.J. $5,000,000. Radio nets 
and associated parta. Camden. Bureau of 
Ships. 

Motorola, Inc., Military Electronics Div., 
Scottadale, Ariz. $4,40B,018. Guidance & 
control systems for the SIDEWINDER 
missile. Scottsdale. Bureau of Navnl 
Weapons. 

Kearney & Trecker Corp., Milwaukee, Wis. 
31,080,041. Tape controlled drilling, mill- 
ing, tapping nnd boring machines for parta 
production of aircraft undergoing overhaul 
and repair. Milwaukee. Navy Purchasing 
Office, Washington, D.C. 

22 Douglas Aircraft, Long Beach, Calif. $1,- 
960,000. Production of A-4E and TA-4E 
aircraft. Long Beach. Bureau of Naval 
Weapons. 

23 University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., 
Applied Physcia Lab. (2,474,000. Research 
& development in the field of underwater 
ordnance. Seattle. Bureau of Naval 
Weapons. 

Bendlx Corp., Eclipse Pioneer Div., Teter- 
boro, N.J. $3,175,000. Amplifiers and com- 
puters used in navigational computer sets 
on hoard Navy Aircraft. Teterhoro, Navy 
Aviation Supply Office, Philadelphia, 
27 Honeywell, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn, $42,- 
573,742. Production of MIC 4G MOD 1 
torpedoes. Hopkins, Minn. Bureau of 
Navnl Weapons. 

Aerojet General Corp., Aausn, Calif. $04,- 
906,121. Production of MK 40 MOD 1 
torpedoes. Azusa. Bureau of Naval 
Weapons, 

Todd Shipyards, Seattle, Wash, $3,883,000, 
Activation of ammunition ship USS 
VIRGO (AE-30). Seattle. Thirteenth 
Naval District. 

Willlamctte Iron & Steel Corp., Portland, 
Ore. $3,784,000. Activation of ammuni- 
tion ship USS CHARA (AE-31). Port- 
limd. Thirteenth Naval District. 
New York Shipbuilding Corp., Camden, 
N.J. $3,809,000. Activation and repair of 
the landing ships, tank, USS CLARKE 
COUNTY (LST-001) and USS COCONINO 
COUNTY (LST-603). Camden. Fourth 
Naval District, 

Bethlehem Steel Corp., Baltimore. $3,028,- 
388. Activation and repair of the landing 
ships, tank, USS BULLOCK COUNTY 
(LST-EQ9) and USS MEEKER COUNTY 
(LST-B80). Baltimore. Fourth Navnl 
District. 

Raytheon Corp., Lexington, Mass, $4,260,- 
830. Guidance and control systems for 
SIDEWINDER missiles. Lowell, Mass. 
Bureau of Naval Weapons, 

28 General Electric, Sehenectady, N.Y. $1,- 
932,950. Design nnd furnish support 
equipment for nuclear -powered snips. 
Schenectady. Bureau of Ships. 



29 



30 



Sperry Gyroscope Co., Sperry Rand Corp., 
Great Neck, N.Y, $11.701.988. Inertlaf 
navigation systems and EUJBOC fated items 
for use aboard Navy ships. Great Neck. 
Bureau of Ships. 

Stewart-Warner Corp.. Chicago. SC,18&,16B. 
Radio transmitter-receivers for shipboard 
use. Chicago. Bureau of Ships. 

NationnI Steel & Ship building Co., Sun 
Diego, Calif. $21,482.000. Construction at 
a combat store fthip (APS). Sun DIoRO. 
Bureau of Ships. 

WestinBhouBO Electric. Baltimore, Md. $Z,- 
177,280. Advanced development model of 
an nntl-aubmarinc warfare radnr. Balti- 
more. Bureau of Ships. 

WcstinKhoHse Electric, Aerospace Div.. 
Baltimore, Md. 51,647,017. Airborne con- 
trol system for F-4H PHANTOM nircrnft. 
Baltimore. Bureau of Nnvnl Weapons. 

Goodyear Aerospace Corp., Akron, Ohio. 
$4,598,001. Production unit of the A-OA 
Weapon System Trainer. Akron. Nnvnl 
Training Device Center, Purl WtiBliinator., 
N.Y. 

Sperry Gyroscope Co., Syosett, N.Y. jl,- 
Ii87,800. Hcfroshtir nminteimnco lralnlr.fi 
laboratories. Syoaclt. Nrvvy Special Proj- 
ects Office. 

Collins Hadio Co., Cedar llnultln, Iitwn. 
$10,110,325. Series oC intofrrnled clcoU-onk 
controls for the U.S. Navy. U.S. Air 
Force nnd the Unltuil Kingdom, Codnr 
Rapids. Bureau of Nnvnl Wonjiorm. 



AIR FORCE 



1 Sylvnnin Electric Products, Wftltluim, Mn&u. 
1,200,800. Fabrication of n M1NUTKMAK 

around electronics uyslom. Walllinin. 
Ballistic Systems Div. (AFSG), Norton 
AFB, Cnlif. 

General Dynamics. San Diego, Calif. |l>- 
108,000. Studies ami evaluations apnlknbla 
to anti-miflHile rcacnrcti. Bun D|CKO, Atr 
Force Special Weapon a Center (APHG), 
KIrtland AFB, N.M. 

2 AVCO Corp., Stratford, Conn. $11,002,122. 
T-G3 engines for Army iiirornft. Stratford. 
Aeronautical SyaLcmii Div. (AKSCj. 
WriRht-PatterBon AFB, Olilo. 

AVCO Corp., Wilmington, Mnnn. $1.800.- 
000. Design, development, fnbrknllon, 1*11 
nnd evaluation of MINUTEMAN MAltK 
11A re-entry vehicles. Wilmlnittnii. llnl- 
liatlc Systems Div. (AFSO), Norton Al'Ml, 
Cnllf. 

3~Samlcrs Asuociatcs, Inc., Bedford, MIWJ. 
1,676,860. Development of iilrcrnft ord- 
nance fuzes. Dcdfovtl. Electronic Syolemi 
Div. (AFSC), L. G. irnnticom Field, Mna.i. 

fl Teledyne Industries, Gnrlnncl, Tex. 11,040,- 
000. Production of seismometers, Gnrlnm!, 
MIddletown Air Materiel Aren (Al-TCJ, 
Olmsted AFD, Pa. 

General Dynamics, Fort Worth, 'J'ox. |1,- 
QliO.QOO. Modiflcntlon of the It lift fliahl 
control system. Fort Win-Hi. Acroiiniiiltol 
Systems Div. (AI-'SC), WrlBli 

AFB, Ohio. 
Coin Rndlo Co., Dallas, Tox. 

Airborne eommuiiicntioiiB nnlonnit Hyrlomi 
for C-13G nlrcrftft. DftHnu, Aoronniilite! 
Systems Div. (AFSC), WrlKliL-rnllerflon 
AFB, Ohio. 

7 Acrodox, Inc., Mlnml, Fit*. $B,HMJ3S. 
Overhaul of R-d360 nlrcrnfl cnslncs. 
Miami. Snn Antonto Alt' Mntcrlo] At* 1 * 
(AFLC), Kelly APIS, Tex. 

8AVCO Corp., Clnclnnnll, Olilo. ?10,GOO.fll)0. 
Equipment for early wnrninB nyotcnw. 
Cincinnati. Electronic Syatcin Div. 
(APSC), L. G. HnnHCom Fioltl. Mnss. 

General Motors, IntHnnaiioHH, Ind. SI.* 
GB2,8IO. Modification of C-181 alrcratl. 
Indlnnnpolia. Snti Antonio A1r Mnlcrlcl 
Area (AFLO), Kelly AFB, Tex, 

Culler 'Hammer, Inc., Deer Pnrfc, N.Y. 
$1,057,260. Spnre pnrtn (or nlrlwi'n* re- 
connftisaance ayatoma. Deer Park. Wnrner 
Robins Air Materiel Area. (AFI.C1, Hollni 

AFB, Ga. 

10 Thfokol Chemical Gorii., Ilrlato], P*r 
$1,000,000. R&D of Stage I motore tea 
MINUTEMAN Wine VI. BrlRhnm City, 
Utah, Ballistic Systems Div. (AFSC), 
Norton AFB, Cnllf. 

I.B.M, Corp., Wnslitngtem, D.C. ^1 ,(00.18!. 
Electronic data processing eomponcnta. 
Poughkeopsle, N.Y. 2750th Air Unno W( 
(APLC), Wriffht-Pnttoraon AFD, Ohio. 



January 



-Ford Molor <'., N.iwiiml Hi-neb, ('iillf. 
],HO,(HM(. Ti-Jil ml'! I'Viiliiulliiii nf mlmillii 
fiiKtmf (11111 iirniliiK ityiili'inn. N.-wpm-l 
liciurli. Hnllliil fir My iilniiii Illv. I A l-'fll 1 ) , 
Nm-lori AKll, t-iillf. 

n~ Miirlln-Mnrlt'Uii. Hull linnn-, Mil. ? l.llJIIi.lKHI. 

M.ull(l<>'Ki I H 117 Klrrn.ri. 11nllltix.iv, 

Wni'iK'V l(i>l>iini Air Miil.'i'l.-l Arm lAFMD, 
Hiililnti AKII, (!. 

- ..-WetliUft"tiii Mli-i-trli', Hiillliniiri-, Mil. Jt,- 
HBH.OOI). Moilltlmtlun <>t iii-ni'i-li niiil lu-li'lil 
IliiiltT rnilnr. Miilllninrc, UKIuliitniti I'll v 
Air Mnli'ilt'l Ami (AI-'Ml), Tlnli.-r AKII. 
01(1 n. 

MHlownrl HIi'Vi'inuiii Hcrvlfivi, lliitmtoit, 'l\-\, 
?l,;ifil,!ll!. I'mihn-llitii nf I'l.Th I,- i.iiwi-i 1 
ircni'i'iitni'ii. Hr mill nil. Jiut'i'iiiiH'iil.i A lr 
Mnl;ri-l Ami (AKI,H), Mrdtrlliui AKH, 
Cull/. 

Ill Sylvniiln Kluctrlr I'riiilncl'i. Wnhtinni, 
MIIHII. *!!, 'KMI.IMHI. W<>rli on iirinuKl i-l.'.'- 
tronli-M iiviilrrn fur MINU'l'l^MAN Wli.it 
VI, Wiillliiini iiii'l MrcilliHin, Miinii, ninl 
Hlltriilo, N.V. llnlllnllr M\ nl-'inn Illv, 
(AKHd), Ntii'loii AKH. I'tillf. 

Ill Trxlrnn. '*'-. Holniniil. <'llf. ? l,'imi,;ifll. 

Cnlilii li'Til. iiln tiuil ilii|.1i-r i)iinriiil>ll>-;i, 

itdlininil. Arniiiiiiil li'iil .'Iviilcniti Div, 

(AlWi), WriKlil-riilli-i'Ht.ii AKII. lllili.. 

< Hintrry Itnnil <'or|i,, I'lmmU, Arl*. 81, - 

IHlUIIifi, I'l'lU-IIITMI'ilK < 'I till UlllllMI'lllx 

lll|[liL I'Dliti-ul iiyiili'iii, I'liKi-nU. An... 
imiillml Hynli'iiin IHv. (A l-'Mtl), \Vrltilit 
I'ntlunii.n Al-'ll, Dlilo, 

(,'nifrnl Mlri'lrh- ('it,, Wnvn.-il. Vn. 

jl,H<l!I.HH-l. I'niriin-UH'.il nf i: HI (1 li.<i'nn 
Kliirlrh-iil fiyiKniin. WuvncMlun,., Aoro- 
tiiillllriil Mynh'lnti I'lv, (A I' 1 .' It '), Wi Ittbl- 
I'ntlcniou Al-'ll, <)1il<i. 

Hpi-rry Itiunl I'tiriL, liiviu Nr.-lt. M,V. 



. <i' 

Iinil ll|<illillill( Ml" fur I, OMAN lilivljinllnli 

ni'ln, (ircul Nri'U, Ai<ii>iiniiil>'iil !!vti<in>i 
IHv. (Al-'!!|, \Vrlnlit 1'itllnrm.ii AMI, 
Ohio, 

17 I.H.M., WiirililiiKlnii, It.C. SI,'.!|(IJlVf,. I'r.i. 
iluotliill nf rliTtfnnlr iliiln I'l'itcnuInK r.|iil|i" 
ini'iil, riiMiililii'i'i'iil.-. N,V. HVMllli Air 
llniiu Whm (Al-'Mll, Wilijlil-rnllKii ..... 
AFM, Olid.. 

-lloiiflywcll, Inc., lli>i.|ilii(i, Minn. SMmi,. 
'/5H, Aln-rnfl nr.liiiiHt'n. llni'lilnn. A.TU-, 
niiiilli'nl llynlrriin IHv. lAHli!). Wiliiln- 
1'ntiormni AMI, ill>!<i. 

Aimlytlcnl HervL-i-H, hir. I ullt, Olmirlt, 
Vn. *l,!HH),|illl), Annlvtl.'nl n (inl|,4 |-.-r 
lulrilnsi In Ilin iiii|ill.<ni'ii i.f wriii'i"'" 
liyillrllltt. l''llllrt Cluil.-ll, All" l'in'cr> Mllll'.. 

of Hrlt'iilinc Krrtciir.'li, \Vh'ililni"ii, D.n. 

H(ihiK Co., Wlrhln.. Kit. Sll.ir.il.lliUl. 
Minllllcitlliiii i.f II d;; iili.n,ft lllwl.l r^pilr,.! 
iiynN'iim. Wirlilln, UlJtitloiiin City Alt' 
MnicHH Ai'i-n (Al'I.iM, TIntuT Al-'ll. tllilii, 

1 Ffdiirnl l-:i*flrli> ro(|.,. Jiklilnml. Wits!,. 
*li,ltlV,IHIl. Mil TKUN Ki<nrrnt..r t.i 4 , 
I...'. 1 '!. 1 . 1 " 1 I'' 1 ''"'"'!!"'!'*' A(r Mttlnflel Ai- 
(Al-'l.fl), M.(!|fl!n.i AMI, |! H !ir. 

'.IT!?' 1 ', 1 '," Ulefl'lf. Ni-w Y,,tk I'lfv, Jl. film.., 
"(Ml. iMiKhi.-.T Hi-rvtfi-fi fun- \h* 4iml, ri.in- 
mniilnilliiiiM nynit-iit, Hmv V.ttfc I'ltv, 
hli'clrimlc HytHrint, lltv, lAl-'lil!). !., li, 
l-'li'lil, MHII. 

lomK (' MnllHn. 'l',-. (l.iMU.mfi 
iH, runilnlili.u i.iul hmtntitnu TV 
;|'lmlc 111 iiinl-j|,, rt'.-nr.lrr vntin, HnllnQ. 
1 ' ..... " <!Hy Air Mrtl.rl.'l Arm (AM.f'l, 
AFII, Oh)n. 

?' t ( '" r "" M*'lHHi. fin, 
..,l. It^vnl..^!!.!!! Mhl ,,;,|,,r. 
lion t,t th<i (! fiA lii'Avy irnniii't.d. (rrrf(, 
i * run,*' - A .;r.ini.iHrnl Hvnlc-oin Ulv. 
(Al'HO), WrlHtil-I'flllfrB.ni AMI, Ulilo, 
1-cnr HtrBler, Inc.. || n i n & I'tn.ir.-ln Illv,. 
Un.( inlHiKl {illy. N.V. |l.fiia,t.4. 1'i.t- 
'l .",-', rn ' h , r t"ll|"r.ll. I.UIIK tnMl.lt 
r y ,\ 'I't''''"^'"!!'*! KvntfitiN |t|v. fAIMUt. 
- <!. lliinm''!!!! l-'ldil, MHM. 



i. 
mli.||.h| H . ... 

fv. |P i! l M. lt ,''. tl . llm MAUK >'* "'- 
ni u l "/'A,-J ( h lh V (t|l ' 1 " fl IWHill.' HiMrmq 
1'lv. (AI-S(J). Nurlitu AMI. ('nl(f. 
"luiminnfl (:.,!, Aiiitt-lM, |I.tlliV,4b|i, 
nil ' np| * " f tl "" 1 " 11 ni#Mnf# mill 
V '" AnirH Air 






, 

"" I> 



' HW I!*"' 1 "* *'P.. I-* Ami*lt. II.. 
H 00 ' ' r V tllirl1 " 11 "' I* ..... arfll.l.l.' l.r..^. 
"' '"""'.mini,,.. iH|ui t) mint. I** 
w ^r"' 1 """^ 1 Hywiflma IHv. 
WrlnliH'niu,ran AKH, Ohio. 



:v I'!;'!';:; Si^Ano"^;;.!''!!^^^! 1 ' 1 ); 1 " 11 - 
l^vi'-sl/K^k^S^ 

M'.'.'HII ,'M"" 'I"" "I 1 ' 1 ? 1 ' l; " llf - $1,731,701. 

S:& 

Air Mai,',-!,-! Ami (AKI,(1). | (ob i ll(l AFH| 



Mnm mmM , . 

MtN i MAM"'" ','"" r "'" llt " 1 r "l">lr "f 
MINIMI, MAN uiiMnii.-,) rm( ] ..... l(| , (1 | ,. 

A'V, M 1 '";'" 1 ' A '! lllh " k H * ll '"" 'v. 
|AI'!,I,|. Nui't.in AKH, (!ii||f 

'' '' P " P ' '"'"' '""' 



.i, <!nlir. 



Miiuirl01 



)i. 



miiloil (., MMIniMl, Midi. S2,OlHi.- 
'.,. I niilui-lliMi nf nln-nifi nnliiiLiii-o, 

I^U^^'M^^ ""'-"" * 

AVr'O Cuni,, Hiniiftinl, (!. S'.IH.'.iHil.Hfill, 
Nxliii-lttm i>f T r.r. nlm-nfl, <>U K |IICII. Hlnit- 

(" |1( '-. Al '' ..... uitl.'iil ilyntciiin Dlv. (AKH(I) 

\Ulirlil-l'nM.'i-nmi Al-'ll, (Hild. 

Ill ''tlrrnl K\ ff t r \ f , I'hilii.Mi.lilu. ^,01)0.011(1. 

Hi:lt( I'-'itliiii itf tin. MiiimiviTlim llnllliitlc 

'"iitrv VVbli'l... I'hirmlHiihln. llnlllnM, 

Mi'-irii. IHv. (AI-'(Hl). Nm-l.m ATM, (Ii.llf. 

"' A. M.-f.' ...... M.-.'in.nli' I'l-iiilm-ln. Monri-d- 

t.iwn, N.J. J(i (Hia.MHI. 11,-iml, ],, v ,-l nililnt*!. 

nriii.',. ft mii'l'lv mi|i|ini'l for inntriiniriitu- 

MI.N iiulnin, Miiui'fiitiixvii. Air l-'urc,. |.: (1 ,i(. 

'.'V. 1 , ' i ' 1 ; 1 . 1 , ltlll| i!". ''"li'l.'li AKH, Kin, 

l.llihr Ucldliijj Co., Kiiimnii (Jjty, Mi>. Jl!.- 

l!iV,ln:i. til kllitivnli. K.'iii'nil.ir iinin wllli 

" ..... " l'" I'H'I ri'lulnt (lain. Knnnnn (Illy. 

.inriiimritlii Air MuU-rli-l An-u (Al-'f,0), 

Mrillrlliin.l AKH, Cullf, 

(iPlirrnl i'rrflnlnii, Inc.. Hlimbiiiupliiii. N.Y. 

j;j. Ml/.llllll, \- HI iiilmiimi Hlninliiliii'ii. 

Illiuiliiitiiiini, Ai'i-niNiiillrul Mynii'inii IHv, 

lAK'ID. \Vrlnbt-l'nllt-r ...... A Hi, Oliiit. 

(Inriclt ('urn., I,..:. AiiKclort, SI.SillfiHaB. 

MIUUT imrhi l,i miin'url (h n-rilral iilr ilnln 

n.ini.iidT .111 [' .| nln-Nifi. I,.i.| Anifc-lcii. 

MiiMlt'lt.wn Air Miil.-rli-l Area (AFI.d). 

Olinnlfiitl AKH. 1'n. 

irnicniiiii lilirtrlc (' Klfrlroiitm ft f)pni-. 

UK-.. Hi, l.^ulii. g:>.r ( ;ir.,m)(). AiXomntl" 

tr'ii i-iinliniiciii for 1-' 111 nlrrnifi iiu<! 

MINIM'I'IMAN inlrotllti nytiti-inii, ,'lt. I,ini|n. 

MliMI.-unvH Air Mul.-rU-l Arm (AKLO). 

llll,,n1.:Uil AKH, I'll. 

Clrvtlnml rin-iMnnltt- Tnul Co., Oliwi-lunil, 
llblu, fl.l"<l.',!:il). 't'nn-li iitirii-uilill<>M unl'll- 
nidl,. if. Kl' i;i5 iilrri'iifi, (IlKvi'liuiil. 
(lii.t.'ii Air Miitt-rlnl An-u (At-'I.O), Hill 
AKH. Ululi, 
Ilnitrjy.rH, Inc., Hi*]>t.hm, Mlim, J-l.llli.. 

Itli:!, tlrvrti.|.iurnt t.f l\ llii;||i>nl llilhlt-r 
)liiilill|i<ll i1in|irnniT. I lii|iltlllil, All' 1'mvltlK 
i;...mul (Vninr, Kultri AI-'H, Kin. 
[.riirral ['rrrlaliiii, Inr,. l.llllit I-'nlln, N..T. 
gfi.l'iili.luill, I'liiiiixiuciiM for niulKiiUmui] 
rf.iii|ttHi-r nrtfi mill ncroinntcn ut'imixl ei|ul|i- 
nirti! f.ir t: 111 Hln-nifi, Hun Miimm, 
I'nllf, A.-n.mmlkiil iiynlt-iiiM IHv. (Al-'.'U't. 
Wrlithl.rnMi'nioii AI'll. Olilo, 
(Juticiiil llyllttitllrn Corit.. II nil Dli-KO, CiiUf, 
m,(!J-.fi,ynn. lirnlmi ft fnlirlcnllim nf r- 
cnliv v>'lilrli- tliHll'iiin.'hliill.ni mill nuiKi! 
nnfi-u- uw>tcjnn, !iiin Dlt'tfd, HnllhitlR fiyn- 
t.i.m IHv. |A1''. L 1M, N..rlon AI-'H. Oiillf. 
'Itiliik'il t'tifinlrn) (!itr|i., Uiiiilnvlllt', Aln. 
!;t.lillli,llliii, iltillil nirkol ninliint. Hiinln- 
vlll.'. tirn.'u tt>Hli<iini Illv. (AF.Hfl), [,<m 



Prom The Sponkors' Rostrum 

(Contfnucd from Page 10) 

1)0 HislecU-d. Kuch country will got Cull 
(latu on the work dono by the other 
cmmLry'a contractor and the ripfhta 
fur imxhiction. Thu main diffcrcncn 
Hi'iHra with t-osiKict to royaltiua. Wo 
will h(> ohlifftitcd to pay Rolls-Royce, 
lor production for our own defense 
otU'H, "fuir inul reiiRonubUi" roy- 
for their ImchKrouiul wo ,.[ c on 

miKlnoB pGi-LIncnt to the ongino 
ii produml, Tht! cnnveii! is true 
Uolls-Royce'R production for 



fo 



Will salon bo competitive? Yes, 

i-iich contractor will bo ontitlcd to 
wiinpcti! for tlio inventory raiuiro- 
munlH of tho other country ami for 
Hiiliw to third partioH. In addition to 
HC|iat'iit;{! hid.s, UK- two contractors can 
al.io Hubinit joint production bids. 

Will there be "industrial compat- 
ibility?" Wu helieve HO, Wo know of 

UollH-ltoyci! interest in the project, to 
the extent that Rolls will he eontrib- 
uliiid a part of the UK share of the 
rout. We believe that we have pro- 
vided Urn winning U.K. contractor nnd 
Uolhi a .sufficiently attractive and 
pnu'liciihln pros ram Tor them to be 
ahle to work out a mutually satis- 
factory commercial agreement. 

Conclusion. 

Thin has been a brief fuummiry of 
what we havis heen doing up to now 
in cooperation in the development of 
military aircraft, In conclusion, nl- 
low me to forecast mime trends Unit 
increajied cooperation should brinjf 
about in the next four years: 

Thorn will be closer working lien 
between the technical and military 
I'leinenlH of our dilTerent Kxwern- 
mentB. 

There will be a hi^hm 1 dcffree of 
lnteKration of the aerospace induH- 
tritiH of the siweral countries. 

* There will bo Kenentl acceptance 
of tht! InminosH franiework for devel- 
opment cooperation. 

* And hint, there will be mnro joint 
meetiiiK'i "f technical societies such 
utt this one. 



DEFENSE PRIME CONTRACT AWARDS 
TO SMALL BUSINESS 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

July-Get. lOflfi July-Oct. J .004 

10,138,887 ?8,888,778 
1,080,048 



ri''X'in-i'.tii'Ht from All Firms 

I'roriiri'iiii-nt from .Small IltisinesB Firms 
Small 



2,072,809 
20.C 



20.2 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 2O3O1 



POSTAGE AND FEES 



OFFICIAL BUSINESS 




ising 



The Department of Defense has increased competitive procure- 
ments by formal advertising- from 11.9 percent of total dollars 
awarded in FY 1961 to 17.6 percent in FY 1965. The FY 1965 
ratio for formal advertising 1 procurements is the highest ever at- 
tained by DOD. 

During- the same period, DOD increased overall competitive pro- 
curements from 32.9 percent of total dollars awarded in FY 1961 
to 43.4 percent in FY 1965. 

A substantial part of this achievement is attributed to increased 
use of a procedure known as two-step formal advertising in the 
past several years. The percentage of formal advertising awards 
utilizing* this method has increased from 2.4 percent in FY 1962 
to 15.1 percent in FY 1965. In dollars, two-step formal advertising- 
awards increased from $85 million in FY 1962 to S726 million in 
FY 1965. 

Adopted in FY 1961, the two-step formal advertising procedure 
requires reasonable assurance of enough qualified firms interested 
in bidding to insure adequate price competition. In the first step, 
technical proposals are submitted by the bidders to determine tech- 
nical competence and, in the second step, prices are submitted by 
qualified firms. Experience with the two-step method shows that 
it frequently can be used in cases where procurements otherwise 
would have to be negotiated, 

The traditional method of advertising procurements for military 
supplies has been to publicize formally the intention to buy certain 
items and solicit offers from suppliers to sell them. Contracts are 
awarded by accepting the lowest prices from qualified suppliers. 

The two-step procedure does ,not overcome all obstacles to in- 
creasing- the formal advertising percentage of procurements, For 
example, the procurements set aside for small business firms and 
labor surplus areas do not lend themselves to such a procedure. 
Also, negotiation will continue to be required for much research 
and development procurement, for many complex weapons systems 
and in those instances where a high security classification is neces- 
sary to avoid disclosure of important development, 

Nevertheless, the Defense Department will continue its efforts 
to increase formal advertising awards, particularly by increased 
use of the two-step method of advertising. 



NASA Publishes 
Aerospace Diction* 

A dictionary which 
some 7,000 technical ten 
being used by scientists e 
in aerospace research anc 
opment has been publis 
the National Aeronautic 
Space Administration. 

The new reference boo] 
signed for use by persor 
scientific or engineering 
tions who are interested i 
outside their own spec 
Each definition is intende 
as clear as possible to tl 
expert. 

Whenever possible, an 
tional definition is used, i 
which defines a concept ir 
of actual operations by wli 
defined quantity can be me 
rather than in terms of ] 
ties. Many definitions lm\ 
adapted from defmitioi 
cepted by Government ag 
scientific and technical s< 
and national and intern 
organizations, 

The publication, titled 
tionary of Technical Ter: 
Aerospace Use," is a^ 
from the Superintende 
Documents, U. S. Govei 
Printing Office, Wash: 
D.C. 20402, for $3. 

Readers of this first 
are invited to submit sug 
changes, corrections or 
ments of definitions to ir 
subsequent editions. 



Volume ? No 2 



IN THIS ISSUE 



Budget for Southeast Aria 
lotnl I'nchaffo Conceiit 
e KDL Ship Project 

in System ami Coal Kffcclivenc 8 



of the Navy 11DT&E Pro fi nun . 22 

Ilrealulown 27-ir 



DEPARTMENTS 

About People ...... 

Calendar of lOventH 
Notes for JOdllors 
Calendar 
l'Vom the Spenhom 



Defense Procm-cmoni 



ISTAHT SECRETARY OF 
AFFAIRS : 



,r KO 

on i>a K o 1 1 H Sccrolnry of 
ing the I, HC a, Year M 




In this issue of the Defense Industi*y Bulletin are featured the 
financial tables pertaining to the Defense budget for Fiscal Year 
1967. Prepared by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller), the tables present the FY 1967 budget in relation 
to budgets of recent years. 

The tables appear on pages 27-36 and cover the following 
areas: 
1. Financial Summary, FY 1961 to FY 1967. 

Direct Budget Plan [Total Obligational Authority (TOA)] ( 

New Obligational Authority (NOA), Direct Obligations and 

Expenditures, FY 1965-1967. 

Direct Budget Plan (TOA), New Obligational Authority, Direct 

Obligations and Expenditures, FY 1967 By Functional Title 

and Service. 

Procurement, FY 1965-1967. 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, FY 1965-1967. 

Estimated Obligations and Amounts Available for Obligation, 

General Fund Appropriations, FY 1965-1967. 

Estimated Expenditures and Amounts Available for Expendi- 
ture, FY 1965-1967. 

Order of Magnitude Data on Comparative New Obligational 

Authority by Functional Title as if FY 1967 Budget Structure 

Had Been Adopted Circa 1948. 

Order of Magnitude Data on Comparative Expenditures by 

Functional Title as if FY 1967 Budget Structure Had Been 

Adopted Circa 1948. 

Estimated Expenditures for Vietnamese Support, FY 1966 and 

1967. 



2. 



3. 



4. 
5. 
6. 

7. 

8. 



10. 



Reactivated for Project Defender 

A modified version of the Army's famed Redstone missile, 
brought out of retirement last June, has been launched successfully 
from the Pacific Missile Range, Point Mugu, Calif. The successful 
launch, which took place after nearly two months of exposure to 
severe storms and salt spray from the Pacific Ocean, demonstrated 
anew how the rocket got its nickname, "Old Reliable." 

The missile was one of several Redstones reactivated by Chrys- 
ler Corporation's Missile Division under contract to the U. S. Army 
Missile Command, The modification and launch program is spon- 
sored by the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) as part 
of Project Defender, a series of investigations in ballistic missile 
defense, 

Redstone was selected for use in Project Defender because of 
its proven reliability, mobility and flexibility which permits adap- 
tion to the ARPA mission .with a minimum cost and reaction time. 
The missile has chalked up an overall performance record of 95 
percent successful nights. 

The Army Missile Command is managing the Redstone launch 
program for ARPA, an agency of the Defense Department. 




Published by the Department 

of Defense 
Hon. Robert S. McNamara 

Secretary of Defense 

Hon. Cyrus R. Vance 

Deputy Secretary of Defense 

Hon. Arthur Sylvester 

Assistant Secretary of Defense 

(Public Affairs) 
Col. J. B. Cross, USAF 

Director for Community Relations 
Col. Edwin C. Gibson, USA 

Chief, Business & Labor Division 



Editor LCdr. E. W. Bradford, USN 

Assoc. Editor Miss Cecilia Pollofe 

Assoc. Editor Mr. Rick La Fake 

Editorial Assistant 

Norman E. Worra, J01, USN 



The Defense Industry Bulletin 
is published monthly by the Business 
& Labor Division, Directorate for 
Community Relations, Office of the 
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Pub- 
lic Affairs). Use of funds for printing 
this publication was approved by the 
Director of the Bureau of the Budget 

The purpose of the Bulletin t is 
to serve as a means of communication 
between the Department of Defense 
(DOD) and its authorized agencies 
and defense contractors and other 
business interests. It will serve as 
a guide to industry concerning offi- 
cial policies, programs and projects, 
and will seek to stimulate thought by 
members of the defense-industry team 
in solving the problems that may arise 
in fulfilling the requirements of the 
DOD. 

Material in the Bulletin is se- 
lected to supply pertinent unclassified 
data of interest to the business com- 
munity. Suggestions from industry 
representatives for topics to be cov- 
ered in future issues should be for- 
warded to the Business & Labor 
Division. 

The Bulletin is distributed without 
charge each month to representatives 
of industry and to agencies of the De- 
partment of Defense, Army, Navy and 
Air Force. Requests for copies should 
be addressed to the Business Labor 
Division, OASD(PA), Room 2E813, 
The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
20301, telephone, OXford 5-2709. 

Contents of the magazine may ba 
reprinted freely without requesting 
permission. Mention of the source will 
be appreciated, 




Excerpts from statement of Secretary of Defense Robert S. 
McNamara before a joint session of the Senate Armed Services 
Committee and the Senate Subcommittee on Department of Defense 
Appropriations on the Fiscal Year 1966 Supplemental for Southeast 
Asia, 



When I appeared before this Com- 
mittee last August with the Amend- 
ment to the FY 1966 Defense Budget, 
I described to you the actions we were 
taking to carry out the President's 
decision to deploy a force of 125,000 
U.S. military personnel in South 
Vietnam and to be prepared to deploy 
still more forces if that should be- 
come necessary. I noted at the time 
that if we were to maintain our 
capabilities to deal with crises else- 
where in the world, these deploy- 
ments would require some increases 
in forces, personnel, operating- rates, 
production rates and construction of 
facilities above the levels provided 
in our original FY 1966 budget. 

Because we had not had time to 
work out detailed personnel plans 
and to calculate on a phased basis 
the increases in activity rates, the 
movements of troops and materiel 
and the other operation and mainte- 
nance costs associated with the build- 
up in Southeast Asia, we proposed 
to finance the additional military 
personnel and O&M costs under Sec- 
tion 612 of the FY 1966 Defense 
Appropriation Act. Similarly, because 
ive had not had time to develop de- 
;ailed estimates of production and 
jonstruction plans for the additional 
nateriel and facilities required, we 
ire-posed, and the Congress appropri- 
ited, an additional $1.7 billion in a 
icparate account, "Emergency Fund, 
Southeast Asia." This appropriation 
V&B intended to provide for the ad- 
litional financing needed through 
arly I960 to gear up the production 
lachine accelerate the delivery of 
ssential items already in production, 
nitiate production of new items rc- 
uired for the support of our forces 
i Southeast Asia and construct the 
lost urgently needed facilities. 
I said at the time that when we 
ppeared here this January, we would 
ave a much more precise estimate of 
te additional requirements and our 
nancial needs for the balance of FY 
)66. These estimates are now avail- 

efense Industry Bulletin 



able, and total $12,345,719,000 in new 
obligational authority. 

Inclusion of Certain Military Assist- 
ance Support in the Defense Budget. 
Included in our supplemental re- 
quest for FY 1966 is about $200 mil- 
lion for the support of South Viet- 
nam's armed forces and other free 
world military assistance forces en- 
gaged in that country. These require- 
ments have heretofore been financed 
in the Military Assistance Program. 
However, now that large U.S. and 
other free world military assistance 
forces (e.g., Korean) have joined in 
the defense of South Vietnam, the 
maintenance of separate financial and 
logistic systems for U.S. arid military 
assistance forces is proving to be 
entirely too cumbersome, time-con- 
suming and inefficient. The same 
problem was encountered at the out- 
set of the Korean War. It was solved, 
then, by programming, budgeting and 
funding for all requirements under 
the "military functions" appropria- 
tions and providing a consolidated 
financial and supply system for the 
support of U.S., Korean and other 
friendly forces engaged in that effort. 
This arrangement gavr the field com- 
manders maximum flexibility in the 
allocation of available resources and 
improved the support of the forces 
employed. We are proposing essen- 
tially the same solution for the prob- 
lems now being- encountered in South 
Vietnam. 

Under the proposed arrangement, 
all unexpended balances of FY 1966 
and prior year military assistance 
funds for South Vietnam would be 
transferred to and merged with the 
accounts of the Military Departments; 
and all additional funds required for 
the support of the forces of South 
Vietnam and other free world mili- 
tary assistance forces in that country 
would be authorized for and appro- 
priated to the accounts of the Mili- 
tary Departments. The remainder of 
the Military Assistance Program 
would be legislated Separately, 



PurCher Force Augmentations and 
Related Personnel Increases. 

If we arc to be prepared to deploy 
additional forces to Southeast Asia, 
some further augmentations of our 
forces and personnel strengths are 
required. The increases in forces and 
personnel now proposed are summar- 
ized in .Table 1 (tables referred to 
start on page 37). The first column 
shows the personnel increases ap- 
proved in August 19155 and the second 
column the increases as revised in 
January 1966. A number of these 
changes require some explanation. 

In the Army, the major change 
since last August is in the number 
of additional military personnel re- 
quired for the support forces. Inas- 
much as it appears desirable to be 
in position to deploy additional forces 
without calling up reserves, those 
support units must be provided in 
the active force structure. In addition 
to that change, we have also added 
another increment of Army aviation 
companies to the number approved 
in August. 

The major increase in the Marino 
Corps over Inst August is an addi- 
tional division force, together with a 
number of tactical helicopter squad- 
rons, observation squadrons and an 
air support control unit. 

In the Navy, we have added to the 
forces approved in August: It LST's 
and one refrigerator stores ship for 
logistic support; more SWIFT boats 
and a mother ship to nugmont our 
coastal patrol activities; a number 
of river control bunts and yard craft; 
and ono destroyer. We have also 
augmented the Navy construction 
battalions in the Pacific area and are 
adding four now construction bat- 
talions to the Navy structure. 

The increases in the Ah* Force are 
related to the retention of B-fi7 and 
F-102 aircraft previously scheduled 
to bo phased out, a major expansion 
in the rotation and training base and 
the logistic support required for the 
forces in Vietnam. 

As shown on the bottom of Table 
1, a total of about 1510,000 military 
personnel will be required to man 
the additional forces and support tho 
increased training, rotation and log- 
istic base. Other adjustmenla in forces 
and activities will add another 17,000, 
but our decision to substitute some 
58,000 civilian for 74,000 military 
personnel spaces will reduce the not 



1 



increase over the original end of FY 
I960 military personnel strength to 
about 453,000, and 113,000 more than 
the increase approved last August. . . 
Table 2 provides a recapitulation 
of the proposed personnel increases, 
including those related to Southeast 
Asia. The second column shows the 
additional personnel required for the 
support of the Southeast Asia effort 
over and above the numbers provided 
in the original FY 1966 Budget as 
shown in column one. The third 
column shows the adjustments result- 
ing from the substitution of civilians 
for military personnel. The fourth 
column shows other adjustments 
(pluses and minuses) related to pro- 
ductivity savings, non-Southeast Asia 
related force changes, etc, The fifth 
column shows the net additions to 
the original end PY 1966 strengths. 
The next column shows the number 
scheduled to be on hand at end FY 
1966 and the last column the balance 
to be added thereafter. 

Additional FY I960 Requirements for 
Procurements, RDT&E and Construc- 
tion. 

Table 3 shows the additional 
funds required for the balance of the 
current fiscal year for procurement, 
for research, development, test and 
evaluation and for military construc- 
tion in support of our combat opera- 
tions in Southeast Asia. Of the $1.7 
billion added to the FY 1966 Budget 
last August, about $1,G34 million was 
applied to procurement, particularly 
for long load time components, new 
production equipment, tooling and all 
the actions necessary to accelerate 
production rates but not actually to 
finance these higher production rates 
beyond about February 1966. That is 
the purpose of the additional $7 
billion which we are now requesting 
for procurement in this FY 1966 
Supplemental for Southeast Aaia. 

The balance of the $1.7 billion 
added to the FY 1966 Defense Budget 
last August, about $166 million, was 
used to finance (through February 
1966) the most urgent construction 
projects needed for the support of 
our military operations in Southeast 
Asia. The additional $1,238 million 
included in the Supplemental will 
complete the financing of the FY 
1966 increment of that construction 
program. 

In preparing the estimates of our 
financial requirements for the balance 
of FY 1966, we have assumed, for 
budgeting purposes, that combat 



operations will continue through the 
end of June 1967; thus the entire 
requirement for the longer lead time 
items through that date is included 
in this Supplemental. 
Ammunition. 

As shown on Table 3, about $2.1 
billion is included in the FY 1966 
Supplemental for ammunition which, 
together with the approximately $1,1 
billion included in the original FY 
1966 Budget and $800 million from 
the August Amendment, gives us a 
total of about $4.1 billion for FY 
1966. This is, admittedly, n very high 
figure; but our operational plans call 
for a massive application of fire- 
power to enhance the effectiveness of 
our forces and reduce casualties. 

Wo estimate that our ground forces 
(including associated helicopter units) 
are now consuming ammunition at 
the rate of about $100 million per 
month, and wo are budgeting for 
a consumption rate considerably 
higher. . . . 

With regard to air munitions, we 
are now consuming at a rate of about 
$110 million per month; and we are 
preparing to support ti much higher 
rate. . . , 
Aircraft. 

Although the aircraft loss rate 
continues low, the rapidly increasing 
number of sorties is resulting in 
larger total losses. ... A total of 
about $1,8 billion for the replacement 
of aircraft losses is included in the 
FY 1966 Supplemental. Another $168 
million is included for the Army to 
equip new aviation units, 

The considerably highor rates of 
utilization of many types of aircraft 
in all the Services will also increase 
the consumption of spares, , . . Ac- 
cordingly, we have included in the 
FY 1966 Supplemental about $1.2 
billion for aircraft spares and other 
aircraft equipment for all the Serv- 
ices. 
Other Materiel. 

The additional funds requested for 
vehicles, electronics and communica- 
tions and other procurements are 
mostly to equip new units, notably 
the additional Army and Marine 
Corps divisions, and for logistic and 
training support as well as to equip 
the new facilities being built in South- 
east Asia. 
Increases in Production Rntcs. 

To support these higher rates of 
consumption and combat attrition, 
rebuild inventories and provide for 
the additional forces, we have greatly 



increased production rates and start- 
ed new production lines, Planned 
production rates of the principal types 
of helicopters used in Vietnam hsivc 
been just about tripled and certain 
fixed-wing types just about doubled. 
Production rates of the principal 
munition items have been increased 
many fold and major increases have 
been made in the production of trop- 
ical uniforms ami jungle boots. 
Research, Development, Test ami 
Evaluation. 

The $1R2 million included in the 
FY 196(1 Supplemental for RDT&10 
is to accelerate certain development 
projects of particular interest to our 
operations in Southeast Asia. You 
may recall that one of the items 
included in our first set of amend- 
ments to the FY 1002 budget wan 
the mini of $122 million for roni'iu-ch 
and development of non-nuclear wonp- 
ons and equipment specifically de- 
signed for limited warn and counter- 
inmirgoncy operations. Since tlmt 
timo, we have vigoroiiwly pin-Hued 
our efforts in that area and many 
of the new weapons, equipment and 
techniques now being employed in 
Vietnam came out of thin work, ';.(,'., 
the armed helicopter, jungle com- 
munications equipment, battlefield 
radara, defoliation agents, emergency 
airfield equipment, lightweight body 
armor, minigun armed aircraft, am- 
munition for M--7I) grenade launchers, 
jungle boots, etc. 

Many other items of this typo nio 
now well along in development. In 
order to maUe them available for UH 
in Vietnam at the earliest iiosHibln 
time, wo have undertaken a now ef- 
fort called Project PROVOST (Pri- 
ority Research and Development Ob- 
jectives for Vietnam Operation!) 
Support), designed to identify thono 
current K&D projects which could 
make a significant contribution to our 
military operations in Vietnam, and 
which, with additional funds, could 
be brought to fruition relatively 
quickly. Ko far the Military Depart- 
ments have identified over J.50 items 
of this typo, and wo have already 
utilized about $R8 million from tlto 
FY 1966 HAD Emergency Fund for 
their support. Wo are now requesting 
an additional $162 million for FY 
1960 to continue and expand this ef- 
fort and to meet other urgent re- 
quirements. Among the items to be 1 
supported with these additional funds 
are the development of a therapeutic 
(.Continued on Paf/o S7) 



February 1966 




Mnj. Gen. Charles H. Terhuuo, Jr., USAF 

When Lockheed Aircraft Corpora- that change should be made. These 

tion was selected as the supplier to facets caused considerable concern 

build the Air Force's C-5A cargo among everyone directly involved, 

plane for almost $2 billion, it marked Being custodian and overseer of bil- 

a major step toward the implemen- lions of dollars of the taxpayers' 

tation of a new purchasing concept money is a serious responsibility in 

likely to influence the future pattern itself. In addition, there is the haunt- 

?T I0n m St maj r wea P ns in ff suspicion that totally unforeseen 

nva <mi trouble zones might cost too much in 

<-oA will be a massive jet the long run, or even adversely affect 

capable of transporting the the quality and supply of needed 

battle equipment on inter- equipment to the operating commands 

continental missions. Twice the size of T]lfl n] , . Ir , . *" , " 

the largest existing carrier, the C-5A !, \ established contracting 

will weitrh moro H, Un 7 i l ]rocedures ^ survived the test of 

win r^! 1 m in a f "LU: oxperie T Aiti r* h they had weak - 

than 2,700 nautical miles Ta ftac J^V^ Pduced the goods. We 

tion of the ton-mile costs of existing 1 *" T'^' Th TPC ' whil 

air transports E havinar very desirable aspects, was an 

untested 



Concept (TPC) of system 
The concept is so new, 
tude and of such importance to con- 
tractors, suppliers and taxpayers that 
the functioning of the concept has 
continued to vie in interest with the 
challenge and excitement of the plane 
itself. 

Heretofore, Air Force purchases of 
complex equipment and systems cus- 
tomarily involved separate contract 
actions for research and develop- 
ment, production, associated aero- 
space ground equipment, training de- 
vices and spare parts for mainte- 
nance. This previous method of system 
acquisition caused a major area of 
general concern. 

A de facto pattern emerged in 
which the element of competition too 
often was limited to -the research and 
development phases. By the time a 
system advanced to the production 
stage, the Air Force was frequently 
faced with one choice; the company 
which Jiad done the earlier work was 
the sole source of production. By com- 
parison, the TPC offers a means for 
extending the competitive umbrella 
to a major portion of the total pro- 
gram requirements as well as covering 
the design, development and test ef- 
fort. 

There is a long jump between 
learning how to make a radical 
change in the purchasing technique 
and determining whether and when 



feit t 

\ 
T 

" * 



had to 


minds 

new proce- 



Therefore, we formed a group of 
some 20 specialists (from fields of 
procurement, management, produc- 
tion, etc.) and charged them to make 
a detailed, critical analysis of all 
facets of the proposed method of ac- 
quisition. Some 32 areas were identi- 
fied and intensively examined for 
potential problems. A great number of 




ij. Gen. Charles H. Terhtine, Jr., 
USAP. is Commander of the Aero- 
nautical Systems Div., Air Force Sys- 
tem Command, located at Wright- 



. 

AFSC's Electronic Systems Div. and, 
oln 19 * to 1959 > served as Dep. 



skilled man-hours went into this con- 
ceptual review. And then, with the 
resultant report and suggestions, de- 
cisions were made as to the manner 
of applying the Total Package Con- 
cept to the procurement of the C-5A. 
The implications of that action may 
be far-reaching. Total results have 
yet to be proved but, in my opinion, 
the Total Package Concept and its 
derivatives could apply to most 
weapon and support system procure- 
ments in the future. 

The TPC aims at one fixed-price- 
incentive contract to cover develop- 
ment, testing, production of the major 
portion of the operational requirement 
and most of the required logistic sup- 
port, including aerospace ground 
equipment and the pricing of spare 
parts and contract technical services. 
All terms and conditions of the con- 
tract, including price, are agreed upon 
at the outset, immediately after com- 
pletion of contract definition, but be- 
fore the selection of a source for the 
development production contract and 
while the matter still rests in a com- 
petitive environment. 

In the case of the C-BA, Boeing, 
Douglas and Lockheed competed for 
the ail-frame contract while General 
Electric and Pratt and Whitney vied 
for the engine contract. Final award 
went to the competitor whose techni- 
cal and price proposals were consid- 
ered to provide the greatest overall 
val ue th roughou t an estima tad 10 
years of operation. We anticipate that 
this application of the TPC will allow 
the Air Force to realize significantly 
lower costs and bettor operational 
performance, 

Tho impact on the contractor is 
considerable: it minimizes "buy-in" 
bidding on the development contract 
with its attendant problems of under- 
stated costa, overstated performance 
characteristics and unrealistic deliv- 
ery schedules. Additionallyand fu- 
ture experience with C-BA will test 
this thesis the TPC could prove a 
catalyst that will encourage simplicity 
of production design during develop- 
ment, a time when relatively small 
effort can result in large efficiencies 
during subsequent production. This 
will mean reduced costs to the tax- 
payer and increased profits to the con- 
tractor. 

Finally, TPC will require the con- 
tractor to obtain supplies and services 
from the most efficient source. It 
will encourage competitive outside 



Defense Industry Bulletin, 



procurement and it will provide fresh 
.opportunities for efficient suppliers, 
large or small. In this environment 
there can be no substitute for quality. 
Nor can the contractor display other 
than, the highest type of integrity, He 
and his associates and the Govern- 
ment will have a lot of eggs in one 
basket. 

Incentives built into the Total Pack- 
age Concept affect not only the cost 
but also the delivery and performance 
of the end item. This control is gen- 
erated by certain peculiarities of the 
contract terms and conditions. Some 
examples: 

o Correction of deficiencies. The 
contractor is held responsible for cor- 
recting any deficiencies in the mate- 
rial furnished at no charge in total 
target cost, target profit, or contract 
ceiling- price for six months after 
Category II testing is complete, or 
six months after delivery of each air- 
craft thereafter. 

Control of changes. Changes in 
the C-5A with an individual cost of 
less than $100,000 will be accom- 
plished at no change in contract tar- 
gets or ceiling. Those over $100,000, 
but less than one percent of the initial 
total contract target costs, will nor- 
mally be negotiated at appropriate in- 
creases in target cost, target profit 
and contract ceiling price so long as 
the cumulative effect of such changes 
is less than three percent of the ini- 



tial total contract target cost. There- 
after, with certain exceptions, the 
profit allowed for any approved 
changes will not exceed two percent of 
the agreed target cost. 

System responsibility. The con- 
tractor has overall responsibility for 
the performance of the total system, 
including all contractor furnished 
equipment and all the integration and 
performance of the engine subsystem 
which is Government furnished. (The 
engine contractor, of course, will be 
responsible for producing and deliver- 
ing engines and related equipment in 
conformance with specifications and 
other contractual requirements.) In 
the C-5A procurement, the aii-framc 
and engine competitors entered into 
contracts which spelled out the re- 
sponsibilities of each and the condi- 
tions for sharing risks and rewards. 

Progress payments. Because the 
magnitude of the task and expendi- 
tures involved before the first deliv- 
eries will be made, the contractor for 
the C-5A will receive 90 percent prog- 
ress payment during the initial stages 
of the program instead of the cus- 
tomary 70 percent. Later, the rate of 
progress payment will revert to 70 
percent. 

* Fluctuations of economy. The 
possibility of significant inflationary 
or deflationary economic trends is a 
recognized risk in long term contracts. 
Therefore, the C-fiA engine contract 



includes a provision to revise target 
cost and ceiling price, beginning three 
years after the award, to reflect ab- 
normal fluctuations by the economy. 
The airframe contractor elected to 
omit this provision. 

Labor law changes. Another pro- 
vision exists for equitable adj ust- 
ment in target cost, target price and 
ceiling price if Federal laws govern- 
ing work conditions, wages and fringe 
benefits cause abnormal changes in 
labor costs or labor overhead. 

Despite limited experience to date 
in the application of TPC, I am quite 
confident it will grow in prominence 
as a means for system acquisition. 
At each milestone along the way, the 
concept will come under renewed 
scrutiny to determine how well it lives 
up to expectations and what adjust- 
ments need to be made to achieve our 
mutual goals. However, even at this 
stage, it is clear that the benefits and 
features of TPC offer great potential 
for both industry and Government. 




Caravan of military vehicles unloads from a mock-up to the planned U. S. 
Air Force C-5A transport aircraft. 



AF Buys New Long 
Tank Thor Space Boosters 

The Air Force Systems Command 
will purchase 21 newly designed long 
tank Thor space boosters to meet 
more difficult launch requirements. 

The new version, which will have a 
greater payload capability than previ- 
ous models, will be unveiled for the 
first time next summer. 

Developed on the "building block" 
concept, which provides'for graduated 
expansion of the Thor's capability, the 
long tank version offers added pay- 
load capability by increasing the vol- 
ume of liquid propellant tanks. 

The liquid oxygen tank has been 
extended and the conical upper section 
of the booster has been changed to a 
straight cylinder of the same diam- 
eter as the rest of the airframe. These 
features permit a longer bum time for 
the main engine, making it possible 
for the long tank Thor to hurl 20 
percent heavier payloads into space 
than the present thrust-augmentea 
Thor. 

Although the total thrust of 330,000 
pounds is essentially the same as- that 
for the thrust augmented conical con- 
figuration, the long tank Thor at- 
tains its increased payload capability 
with a 216-second burn time com- 
pared to 146 seconds for the thrust- 
augmented Thor. 

Combined with various upper 
stages, the long tank Thor is ex- 
pected to shoulder the majority of the 
Air Force's space programs at Van- 
denberg AFB, Calif, 

February 1966 




RAdm. Nathan Sonenshein, TJSN 

Program Dir,, FDL Ship Projects 

Bureau of Ships 



Three thrusts, or streams of effort, 
intersect in the Fast Deployment 
Logistics (FDL) Ship Project. 

First, the development of a sea- 
borne system for rapid deployment of 
U.S. forces. 

Second, the trial application of 
contract definition processes for ships. 

Third, the trial application of the 
"total package" approach for ship 
procurement, 

Let me discuss briefly each of these 
efforts, starting with a summary of 
the development of rapid deployment 
concepts. In response to the Secre- 
tary of Defense's interest in develop- 
ing efficient methods for basing U.S. 
ground forces on this continent and 
deploying them rapidly to overseas 
areas, in 1964 the Navy initiated con- 
cept studies on the Logistic Support 
of Land Forces, commonly known as 
LOGLAND. Increased flexibility and 
speed of response, reduction in total 
cost and improvements in the inter- 
national "balance of payments were 
obviou s ob j ectives. 

LOGLAND became the wcllspring 
of the FDL when it developed that 
ship systems could play a vital and 
effective role in the deployment of 
ground forces, especially their heavy 
equipment. Thus evolved the concept 
of large fast ships with both rapid 
cargo handling capabilities and em- 
barked lighterage and helicopters for 
over-thc-bcach unloading in the ab- 
sence of port facilities. 

A versatile system was envisioned: 
in one possible mode of operation, 
these ships would be loaded with 
ground force divisional equipment 
maintained in a ready-to-roll condi- 
tion. With FDL ships strategically 
deployed, airlifted troops would ren- 
dezvous and marry up with the heavy 
equipment on short notice. Thus, in 
the rapid deployment of ground force 
equipment, the FDL's would com- 
plement the C-GA's and other air- 
lift aircraft. 

The second major stream of effort 
in this project is to apply the con- 
tract definition process to ships. This 
approach has been successfully ap- 
plied in the development of numerous 



weapon and aircraft systems ; the 
FDL application represents a "first" 
for ships, and adaptation and refine- 
ment of the process may be necessary. 
To assist those who are not acquainted 
with DOD terminology, a few defi- 
nitions may be in order: 

Concept Formulation describes the 
activities preceding a decision to carry 
out engineering development, These 
activities include comprehensive sys- 
tem studies and experimental hard- 
ware effort under exploratory and ad- 
vanced development and are a pre- 
requisite to carrying out engineering 
development. 

Contract Definition, unti! recently 
referred to as Project Definition 
Phase, is that phase during which 
preliminary design and equipment are 
verified for accomplishment and firm 
contract and! management planning 
are performed, 

The total package approach to ship 
procurement is the third major thrust 
of the FDL program. In this project, 
the total package will consist of four 
major elements: 

Ship Design and Development. 

Facilities Plan. 

Ship Construction (Multi-year, 
Series Production). 

Ship Performance. 

Emphasis is placed not only on the 
initial acquisition cost of ships, but 



on the entire package as well from 
design, through facilities improvement 
for construction, ship production by 
series production and, finally, to i-eli- 
ability, maintainability, maintenance, 
operating cost, correction of deficien- 
cies and guarantees or warranties of 
cost and performance for a selected 
number of years after delivery. Heavy 
emphasis will, therefore, be placed on 
design work study, value engineering, 
shipyard automation, minimum main- 
tenance, preservation methods and 
and other techniques for reducing the 
maintenance and operating costs of 
ships, which greatly exceed their in- 
itial acquisition costs. For example, 
a new class of Navy reefer ships, 
designated AFS and now being de- 
livered to the Fleet, will have an esti- 
mated 20-year maintenance and op- 
erating cost of $63 million while their 
initial construction cost is only $27 
million. 

With these new procurement con- 
cepts, we expect to attain : 

Added impetus to the moderni- 
zation of shipbuilding techniques and 
facilities. 

Lower average cost of ships. 

Increased standardization of 
ships, 

Increased industry input into 
Naval ship design and construction. 

The anticipated additional impetus 
for the modernization of private ship- 
building techniques and facilities is 
an important consideration in this 
concept, Sweden's Arendal Yard is a 
prime example of a modernized ship- 
yard. This yard was placed into serv- 
ice in mid-1963 in Gotaverken, Swe- 
den, and represents, in my opinion, 





SCCMtV 


_, 




swtee&teemH 

MWS8tf CQl/f/C/t 


4$ff(i&i7 

SOURM UG7lON AWHOgtTV 








satinet setters 

Wt/ffl$tt BSBRP 





PMGRfiM 



6ROUP 
(01,04,06,01 KWS) 



OP-31 
Op-32. 



PM-I 
PM-Z 



FPl Sff/PWJfff 
OP-03f 




8USHIP5 


BUS&tl 


eerw 


BUMPS 



Figure I. 



Defense Industry Bulletin, 



the most advanced shipyard in the 
world for the production of commer- 
cial type ships. It is producing 70,000 
dead-weight-ton tankers at 40 percent 
of the man-hours used in producing 
similar ships at its parent conven- 
tional shipyard five miles distant. It 
emphasizes a steady, straight line flow 
of material by mechanical conveyors 
from the plate yard, through fabri- 
cating: stations, to a major assembly 
shed and intense application of the 
most modern methods of production 
control. In the assembly shed, sub- 
assemblies up to 300 tons in weight 
are placed on building ways and largo 
hydraulic jacks literally extrude the 
partially assembled ship into the 
building docks as each successive sec- 
tion is added. Methods such as these 
are permitting this yard, whose wage 
rates are more than twice as groat as 
those in Japan, to deliver ships com- 
petitively priced with those produced 
in Japan. Those ships arc delivered 
in 20 weeks from start to trials after 
a seven-week erection period. 

In sharp contrast to this exciting 
advance in shipbuilding facilities in 
Sweden, which is paralleled by sim- 
ilar progress in Japan and other 
European countries, there lias not 
been a major shipyard constructed in 
the United States since the end of 
World War II; and facilities im- 
provements in private yards have 
been, with a few notable exceptions, 
only minor. It is our expectation that 
application of the total pack age ap- 
proach on a multi-year basis, per- 
mitting series production of a sub- 
stantial number of ships, will en- 
courage and permit the construction 
of new, or the modernization of old, 
facilities to equal or better tho pro- 
ductivity being attained in yards such 
as Arendal. In fact, it is our belief 
that the offerers will find it advan- 
tageous to use such approaches, and 
our studies indicate that tho cost of 
such improvements could bo amortized 
in the kind of project we are plan- 
ning, 

Our expectation to achieve the sec- 
ond point lower average cost of ships 
is founded again on the fact that 
we contemplate constructing a largo 
number of ships in series and, there- 
by, taking full advantage of the phe- 
nomenon known as the progressive 
curve. Various mathematical formula- 



tions have been developed to oxprens 
the relationship that him been ob- 
served in series production, In gen- 
eral, they say that, as the total qimn- 
tity of units produced doublet!, the 
cost per unit declinoH by some con- 
stant percentage. Thus, if wo Hpeah 
of a progi'OHH curve with a slope of 
85 percent, we menu that as the num- 
ber of units produced is doubled, unit 
costs are decreased by 15 percent. 
Analytical studies comparing various 
quantities of ships show tlmt signifi- 
cant gains in cost and lime ciin lie ac- 
complished through series production 
and modern i'/.ntion. During World 
War II, the first five Victory ships 
built in it yard rotiuired an average 
of :l,100 Tnan-hours per ship. In Unit 
yard, the number of man~hourn 
dropped to 711 when nbmil ;IO of 
tbese same ships were coMKtnid.i><| in 
series. 

Increased standardi/aliim of ships 
is the third expected result of the 
now procurement concepts. Kroin tin- 
point of view of the Fleet, which lum 
to operate Navy tthipH, Ihis in pnili- 
ably the moxt important attribute be 
cause it impinges directly on the login- 
tic support of ships and iht> training 
of men to operate equipment in the 
ships. Lack of standardl/iiUon In one 
of the least desirable by-products of 
our present method of whip procure- 
ment Of about IHO.OOO hull, machin- 
ery and electrical compunenUi con- 
trolled through the, Ship's I'art;i Con- 
trol Conlor in MechaiiiciilmrK, !'., Hi* 
ne.rcont have only ono application in 
tho Kleet. .Series production of all the 
FDL ships in one atilpyiml should 



provide, ii "lirccl, route to I'li 
complete iilmiilanM/atlon. 

finally, Hi" new proniri'ment <-un- 
ceplN will nhin iiicreiuii' indimlry in- 
put into iMU'iil ship ilt'/ilKii and f<m- 
Ktrui'tioM. There an> currently in (I,,, 
United Slle;i over MHO private uln'p- 
yards enjmlile of roiuit nicljnn mui re- 
pair of dhipii, ami there mv jtomo 
three do/m private tli'til^n agents. 
Hy way of ili'llniUmi, 1 nlmulil ituy tlmt. 
preliminary di'iti([n, fun tract ilrtti^n 
mid detiiiU'd I'OMiilniclinit ih'nij>n ant 
three nle|i[i of iiirtvaiii'il ivlliiemenl in 
the. prepurnLion of USN iihip i|e;ii([ii!i. 
Very few nhipyanlii have organic du- 
sign rapuliililleM beyond preparation 
of niimlrm'tioii planri, liul ilcjit-ui! in., 
stead on ili'ul|fii iiKent.'i fur p 
tion of pn-IJiniiuu y an<l rnulntct 
niKii. Only VH Mliipyunln nui luindlc 
ships iiver -1IHI fret in IctiKlli nnd 
about, 111 ilenlKM iiKeitl;i Inivi- brcii 
denliiiK nc'liv.-ly In ivrrnt y.-arn with 
Hie Navy Di'puiliiieni in ciuiiit'i-litin 
will) itn JihijiliuiMinjf pniKrainn. 

Of Ilieni- SJ-1 ciiiireriui (VH plnn |li) | 
very few have preliminary and nni- 
tract ileninn rapabllity, Tlie laelc nf 
iihip (IculKit, iiydteni iiiaiiiincmi'iil, or 
ope.ratioiml iinnlynin nipuhillly HIIIIHI^ 
iiliipyaniti in u rrmili nf .-siiitiiiK chip 
Iinicurcnicnt |H'iirtln-ii; Imwrver, It 
need nut, lit- a bur to itllalniiur midi 
nipaliility rilhrr hy rohtiacl nr by 
direi-L hlri'. In fact, Iliin mellmd ,.f 
olitainiiiK M'H'li tiuppui I i;i IIMW 1'iiMininii 
pnu'Uco in On- filniihuiMlnj: imltmlry 
in tilts nMtntiy, Inclilftitttlly, It f 
not our intention ( n ivimiie rn'otui' 




MANAGER RADM. SONENSHtIN 

DEPUTY (APT, SAUER HMM 



nNANCUl Ml. i'M COUNS(l 



00) 

MMIII tWflM II j 

' I* I J 




Figure II. 



Pebruttry 1966 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Lt. Gen. James B. Lamport ITS A 
was designated principal D e p ' Ass i 
tant Secretary of Defense (Manpow- 
er), effective Jan. 7. Mr. Roy K & 
enport was designated Dep. Asst Sec- 
retary of Defense (Manpower fe r 
Planning and Research, effective Jan 2 

Col. Ben W. Le^are, USA hai 
been assigned to the Office of the 
Asst 




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 



m *i M - Hea-man has 

moved ahead from duty as Dep. Dir., 

n!S + %' Bu ^ au of Yar ^ s and 
Docks, to the position of Dir., vacated 

tirecf 



AoBf "X" 4 *""" lo cne office of the 

.n^srs # jr-i sr A ir- * - p- t , 



eense (Pub- 

lic Affairs). He will be relieved as 
nformation Officer, Military Assist- 
ance Command Vietnam, in VebiSiry 
by Col. Rodger R. Bmiksoi,, USA Col 



Army, 



Col. Fred H. Sitlcr, USAF, has 
been assigned as Commander 



. 

i <r t his, Term Ho 

has been serving as acting comman- 
der smce November following tne re- 
USA l SBmiiel R Laujlc?, 

Col. Bert S. Harris. USAP, is now 
servmg as Chief of the Technical Test 
and .Evaluation Div., Defense Com- 
munications Agency, 

Lt. Col. Herbert D. Clark. USA, 
has replaced Lt. Col. J esse G, Hill 

' ^,? retired Nov - 30, as Ex- 
ecutive Officer, Defense Documcntn- 

Agency 61 ' f th 



Col, Edmund Kirby -Smith has 

r? P> D , iv ' E ^ in ^r, South 
Div., Ai-my Corps of En- 

3 *-' succeeding CoL 



Col. Harry P. Cameron, Jr., has 
been named Mediterranean Div En- 
gineer for the Army Corps of En- 
gineers with headquarters in Leg- 
horn Italy. He takes over the 
position in March. 

Maj. William A. Colo is serving as 
Acting Project Manager of the Ser- 
geant Weapon System, Army Missile 
Command, Huntsville, Ala. He re- 
placed Col. J. Mort Loomis, Jr." who 
retired Dec. 31. 



RAdm. William F. Petrovic has 

talcen the helm as Commander, U.S 

Sh T ^ yai "i E ok] yn. N.Y.; from 
John H. McQuilkin. 

n*f S ; MarJ e Cor PS has a new 
? T :i \? f Information. He is Col. Paul 

Bri J * r2! rl r* n The ,T OU ^, oin ^ director, 
Bug._Gcn Arthur H. Adams, has been 

wSfn*"'!?- aS r> Co]ni "'"ling General, 
Marine Air Reserve Training Com- 
mand, Glenview, 111. 

wJ 6 ^ o[!owi "S Marine Corps officers 
were advanced to the rank of brijra- 
dier genera in January: Brig. Gen. 
arlE Anderson, Brig. Gen. Clifford 
p Dral ' > Bff. Gen. Michael P. 
Ryan and Brig. Gei,. Frank E. Gar- 



DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 



DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 




ho t J < HllBh B - Manson has 
been named to succeed the late Maj. 

A?,' 1 ' fc* fe.^'S! 1 as Commander, 
An F e M Test Center. Eel- 



v t"^, *"* *'""" has been an 
pointed Dir. of Research and Lab 
oratories U S. Army Materiel Com 
mand (AMC) headquarters, Wash 
me-ton, D.O. He will 1 he the firs? to 
nil the newly created position. 

Lt. Gen. John L. Throckinorton has 
succeeded Lt. Gen. W. H. S. Wrighi 

Ron Th' ( nce r * GSei ; vo Components 
^en. 1 hroelnnprton has been Dep 

^S 1 ^' 6 / ' Millt *ry Assistance Com- 
mand, Vietnam, since July 1964. 

Lt. Gen. James H. Po'lk has bean 
reassigned to succeed Lt.. Gen. Thco- 
? l c? Conway, as Asst. Chief 

of Staff for Force Development, U. S. 
Army. Gen. Comvay will 
""' '' of the Seventh U.S. 



Brig .Gen. Lloyd B. Uamsey has 
been seleeted to fill the post of Dep. 
Chief of Information. He will as- 
sume Ins new duties March 1. Gen 
Ramsey served as Dep. Command- 
rSt Gen ^ al '. U>Sl Arm y Training 
W^ <Enffmfler) ' Foi ' fc Leonard 
Wood, Mo., prior to being selected for 
Jns new assignment, 

lt Ra . y '' no " (1 s - Grossman lias 
i ( Pr tf ect . Manager for 



~ has been ap- 

f ^luV'r ' Uefj Technical and Indus- 
trial Liaison Office, Office of the 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



in T' " ' B 

i Jan V ai 'y when the plane he 



Brig. Gen. Keith I, Ware, 50, has 
become Chief of the Army's Office of 
Information relieving Maj, Gen. 
George V. Underwood, Jr., Feb. 1. 

The new Chief of Information/ the 
thirteenth to servo in the position 
since it was created in January 1946, 
ins also been selected for promotion 
to major general. 

Gen. Ware has been Deputy Chief 
of Information since September 1963. 
iofore coming to the Pentagon for 
luty he served as Assistant Division 
Commander. . Second Armored Div 
Port Hood, Tex, 

The new Army Information Chief 

was commissioned July 18, 1942, and 

erred m Europe during World War 

I. He is a holder of the Congressional 

Wedal of Honor, Silver Star and 

ronze Star. 



ri!? l '% ^ n '- ? haitl es G. Clianriler, Jr., 
fhL n* Ma l ntena "ce Engineering in 
the Omce Dep. Chief of Staff, Sys- 
tems and Logistics, has been reas- 
signed as Dir. of Materiel, Pacific Air 
1' orce. 

The now Chief of Electronic Sys- 
tems Division's Electronic Data Pro- 
cessing Equipment Office is Col. S, P 

wi , n ?-i, re P laces retired Col. 
Edward McCloy. 

J% 1 \ L . llai *rt W. Lflley has succeed- 
ed Col. William J. McGinty as Dir. of 
information for the Air Force Sys- 
tems Command at Andrews APB, Mel. 
Cot. MeGmty is now aerving in South 
Vietnam as Dir. of Information for 
the 2nd Air Division. 

Col Joseph E. Andres has been 

named to replace Col. George C. 

Hozier as Dep. for Subsystems and 

Equipment Management at Aeronau- 

tical Systems Div., Air Force Sys- 

\ e Command, Wright-Patterson 

AFB, Ohio. Col Hosier will retire 

li'om the Air Force on being relieved. 

Col. Maurice R. Reilly has been 

ordered to Headquarters, Air Force 

fc>ysteins Command, Andrews AFB, 

Mel., where he will serve as Dep. Dir. 

of Communications Electronics. 

Col. George B. Mtmroe, Jr., has been 
assigned to the Office of the Dep 
Chief of Staff (Research and Develop- 
ment) as Asst. for Foreign Develop- 
ment. * 



March 3-d: DOD-National Security 
Indimtrinl Ansn. Advanced Planning 
HricfiiiRH for Industry, Boston, 

MaSH. 

Murch 3-4; Third Anninil SmilheaHl- 
orii HympoHinm on (Joverninent 
Oontrncln, New York City. 

March 9-10: I)()I)-Nnlloiml Security 
Industrial AHHLI. Advanced Planning 
IlricflntfH Tor Industry, Atlanta, (in. 

March 10-17: WW-Nalloiial Security 
Industrial AHHU. Advanced Planning 
HriofhiRM for Industry, HI. Louis, 
Met. 

March 21-24: IiiHlitiiln of Hlcctrlcal 
& NIcctmnicH ICiiKineerH MxpoHi- 
tion, New York City, 

March 22-111 ; American Chemical So- 
ciety Meeting Pittsburgh, I'a. 

March 2-1: Thirteenth .lumen l''orrcH(al 
Memorial Award Dinner, Wanning- 
ton, D.C, 

Mnrcli 27-Aprll 2: American Society 
of Phologrammotry Meeting, Wash- 
ington, !).('!. 

April fi-ll: Armed Forces Comainnica- 
tloiiH Klectronk'H AHHU.-U.H. Army 
Klectronie.s Coannatul HympoHlum, 
Fmi Monmonth, N..I. 

April 11-lfi: Institute of I'lnvironimm- 
lal Helena's Meeting, Han Diego, 
Calif. 



Eglin AFB Unit 
Redisigncited as Lab 

Tim Directorate nf Annann'iit ]>(! 
volopment nt I'ljjlln AV'U, Ha., linn 
boon rcdoHiKimted tho Air Force Arm- 
amont Lalmratory, cflVctivt! Mureli 1, 
1000, 

The, Air Form Arniami'iit Iiiiliora- 
lory in nwpoiwilih' for exploratory, 
advanced nntl eiitfineerltiK il(!velo|tment 
liroK't'aniH for non-iniclcitr imimllmiH, 
tui'Kottt nnd Hiioroi-H, liallistii-H and im- 
HociaLcd areaH. 

Tho laboratory ox<>culen iiHHlKiii'd 
projwilH mid works cloudy with tlio 
Army, Navy and other (Jovonmicnt 
apfdiiuios, and HUiiports otlmr Air 
Korco HyutomH Cloiniuitnd 
within aHHiRimd IWJUH of 
hllity. 

Commanded liy Col. Wiiltur I 1 , 
(i)ovor, tho Arimmitmt Lnbonitory IH 
Htaffi^l by more, than UOO military iincl 
civilian pomonnnl. Laboratory activity 
is uiifcmontftd by nmcarch ana develop- 
ment oontracts with huUiBtriul con- 
(turns nnd univorBltln. Contrucla CUB- 
rontly in force arc valued at over $00 
million. 



8 



April 12-1,1: DOD-National Security 

InduHlrial AHHU. Advanced riiinninjv 

HrieflnjiH for Industry, San l ( 'nm- 

CJHCO, < In I U'. 
April IH-H1: Aeronpace Medical AHHU. 

Meeting, Iiim VOKH, Nov. 
April IH-22: American (Jcopliyttlcal 

Union Meeting, \Vashin|vlni, D.C. 
April IH-22: American Society of Tool 

and MiumfactiiriiiK Mnitincei'H Meet- 

ing, Han I'mnciHCo, Calif, 
April 2't-UH: American Society of Me- 

chanical KiiKineers Mcelinit, Kan- 

SIIH City, Mo. 
April 27-2H: l)OI>-NHonal Seciirify 

IndiiHlrial AHSII. Advanced IMiinninic 
fr Induslry, Washing"", 



May l-(: American Institute of ('hem 

leal 1'InicineerH Meetinc, Colninhus, 

Ohio. 
May 1-1 ! National Association of 

I'llcclrical Oistrllmtors McctliiKi 

Miami Hcach, Kla. 
May 1-5: American Hnciely for Micro- 

biology Mecliii);, I .on An^elrs, 

Calif. 
May H-5: American Society of Lubri- 

cation I'lniflin'i'i'H Mei'tittK, I'll In- 

bui'Kh, Pa, 

May Jl-'ll: National Aerospace MltM 1 - 
Conference, Dayton, Ohio. 



May lfl-12i National Tele 
Conference, Howl on, MIUIH. 

IMiiy 11-111: American lltdlcop 
ely IVIei'liitfr, \VanhiiiKlon, 1 

May 1(1-20: American Hodely 
KuKlneerii Mcelinj;. Denvci 1 

May 3l-.luiH' 11: American Soi 
(Inalily Conlrol Meclinu, N 
CHy. 



AFA National Convoi 
Slatocf for March 22 

Tint Twentieth Anniventi 
tin- U. M. Air I'Virce <'innl)!il 
Tuct-icnl Aii 1 ( 'DID 
c Air ('nintntintl mi 

Ili'l'iMltH' (!n|lll)l!LIl(| Will I 

hili'il at- the Air l-'tin-e Aii 
linn nitt ionnl rnnvrnlin 
Korl, Win-Ill, Tex., I 



IIi|vlili|',ht iiiff (tic runvi 
will IIP nwjni' iinlley ml'l 
liy Si-erelnry nf |ln> Air 
llunilil Hruwii nntl Air 
Chlrt' of SInIV Ci-iK-ral ,1. I 

f'iHIIH'11, 

Mi'iniinirit nnd i<ytnptinin) 

Ki'V UiTiiHimrn Immt'Jt Will ll 

diiriiiK HM< riiMVPiiliun a 
lai'K' 1 air nlmw will In- j- 
nl ('lu'HWi-lt A I''H nt'ur 
Wurtli. 



Two Handbooks on 
Civil Defense Emergency Available to Industr 

Henry, it tiervt'M us Hie frnme 
Hie cninimny civil defense jd 
"ImliHlrial Civil l)i>foiin( 
nurti" in u publieittion intends 
local civil defense directors, 
or industry i-Nmilivt'H, nr nth 
I'tdt'd purwiiw wlitt may be nil 
pbin, m'K'ani/n mul conduct il 
civil di'fen:i^ iiemhmni. 

Tin* handbook ritiiliiiiin n 
discuHHion of the ftictorH on; 
HiiceesHful indimlriul civil : 
Kemhutr depends, an well HH 
lint of required actions thill 
utted In I'vnhmU' thit eontplel 
Hemiujir urraiiKt'tnentH at en 
of plnnnhiK find inaniiKi'iK \\> 
ft-renci!. | 

Copii'H of bulli publications 
oblnini!(l| frco nt cbarKe, fri 
Army AG PubliwitioiiH Cent 
HefiMiHM Hrancb, UHOO KiiHtor 
vard (Mitifllc Hlver), linHini 

'mzo, 

Fob run 



The (Ullniof Civil Dofenai- 1ms nub 
llsh(!<l two liamllmului detiiKiied (o nehi 
prepnri! the niition'ii InduHlry for civil 
defimiio (tmei'KeiH'y. The. two hand- 
liooltH aro titled, "lndutitrinl Civil He- 
fciiHn WorklnHik" {I'nbliciition K(J K 
;i,H) mul "Industrial Civil Dcfniw 
(I'ublicutlon K(! F !!.). 

purpone, of Hie "Industrial Civil 
i Workbook" IH to helji tin- 
H tinil mitniiK'TH of Indimtrial 
ami commercial I'liturnriHed prepnre 
for Hiirvivul in ease of an attack on 
tint United StalcH. It IK denuded cKpc- 
ciully for UKi! by jmiprle.tnrH or man- 
aicerri of facilitteH havliiK relatively 
Kinall 



ThiH booklet outHneH UMI biiHic, far.- 
torn U> bo considered hi mnlfiiiK Ibo 
compmiy'H civil defend plans. He- 
(ituiBti it provide Hpuce for ntcordinir 
tbn dc^'lHioiiH, tusk usHiKiinii'iitH iuul 
otliw informutlon needed to prrpiin! 
tho flrin for a civil dofonmt emor- 



NOTES FOR EDITORS 



c . 



Briefed below are some events 
and projects within the Depart- 
ment of Defense which may be of 
interest to writers and editors. If 
further information on any of 
these topics is desired, please write 
to Chief, Magazine and Rook 
Branch, Office of Assistant Secre- 
tary of Defense (Public Affairs), 
Washington, D.C. 20301 



AUTOMATIC WEATHER 
DEVICE DEVELOPED 

Greatly improved weather forecast- 
ing capabilities have been provided 
Army field commanders with a new 
Atmospheric Sounding System. Heart 
of the transportable device is an auto- 
matic sounding set which processes 
data received from a sensing radio- 
sonde carried swiftly aloft by spe- 
cially designed balloons or rockets. 
Brief meteorological messages are 
produced by feeding into a computer 
information on temperature, humidity, 
wind speed and direction and atmos- 
pheric density. The system can also 
predict accurately the spread of 
atomic fallout. 



LOW-MELT ICE CREAM 
BEING DEVELOPED 

The Army is developing a low-melt 
ice cream for Navy submariners. 
Specifications call for an ice cream 
that will remain more than 80 per- 
cent unmelted for 15 minutes, even 
when served with other foods on a 
hot meal tray (about 100 degrees F.). 
The frozen dessert must also resist 
80-degree room temperatures and look 
like, taste like and be as refreshing 
as the shore-dispensed product, By 
using additives and modifying the 
basic ice cream formula, the Army 
already has developed an ice cream 
that melted only 30 percent at 90 
degrees during the test period. 

Defense Industry Bulletin, 



EYE-BRAIN INFORMATION 

TRANSFER STUDIED 
BY NAVY COMPUTER 

Navy scientists have adapted a 
computer technique to trace messages 
from receipt on the retina of the eye 
to their transfer to cognizant areas 
of the brain. The technique uses a 
(lash stimulus the size of a pinhole in 
a large black background. Sensitive 
electrodes taped to the subject's skull 
record the arrival of the message in 
the brain. The computer measures the 
extremely short time delay between 
the eye and brain and between points 
at different locations in the brain. It 
also records the way the eye measures 
the growth of the amount of light 
from its first detection until it reaches 
maximum intensity. Furthermore, it is 
able to distinguish the difference in 
response between right and left eye 
and the strength of the input to the 
right and left lobe of the brain. A 
correlation between right and left eye 
strength and right and left handed- 
ncss seems to be present. 



AUTOMATED PACKAGING 

INFORMATION SYSTEM 

SLATED FOR DOD 

A computerized system which auto- 
matically prints out packaging re- 
quirements for any item entering or 
already in the Defense Department 
inventory is being developed by the 
Air Force. The system will provide 
immediately usable packaging- data 
based on characteristics of the item, 
mode of transportation, destination 
and other factors. Under the new con- 
cept, when an item requiring special 
packaging enters the inventory, the 
computer will be interrogated to de- 
termine whether an existing design 
will properly do the job. If no suit- 
able design exists, engineers will de- 
velop a packaging method for the 
item. This information will then be 
fed into the data bank for future use 
on the same item or on items for 
which the design may be suitable. 
For items already in the inventory, 
the machine will quickly indicate the 
approved packaging design. 




A low-melt ice cream for Navy submfarines is being developed by food tech- 
nologists at the U. S. Army Materiel Commmand's Natick (Mass.) Labora- 
tories. Working on the project are Dr. Joseph Tobias (right), Professor of 
Uairy Technology, Food Science Department, University of Illinois, an Army 
Heserve lieutenant colonel who has a .mobilization assignment at Natick, 
and Dr. Charles C. Walts of the Natick Laboratories' Food Division. 



by 

Lt. Gen. W. Austin Davis, USAF 
Vice Commander, Air Force Systems Command 



System effectiveness and cost ef- 
fectiveness will be increasingly im- 
portant concerns as our technology 
programs continue to advance and 
military systems become more com- 
plex and more costly. In addition, 
decision makers are being 1 confronted 
with increasing options in systems ap- 
proaches to meet given requirements. 
They must make qualitative and quan- 
titative decisions that were unheard 
of until recent times. 

Thus, the need is crucial for meth- 
ods of assessing the effects of varia- 
tions in technical and operational 
characteristics of weapons systems in 
order to achieve the best overall sys- 
tem effectiveness on a cost-acceptable 
basis. This means that we must fur- 
ther improve our analytical capabil- 
ities. 

Both system effectiveness and cost 
effectiveness analysis are in their in- 
fancy. There are as yet no standard 
techniques for effectiveness prediction, 
evaluation and demonstration. We 
must have these standard techniques 
before TVC can have clear communica- 
tion and, thus, real progress. The re- 
cently completed, year-long study by 
the Weapons Systems Effectiveness 
Industry Advisory Committee (WSE- 
LAC), which was sponsored by the Air 

" '- "-- -i (AFSC), 

lardized 
not pur- 
port to develop new tecnmques hut 
rather to pull together the best of 
existing techniques in the numerous 
funtional areas that influence total 
system effectiveness, 

We have the beginning of a stand- 
ard approach, standard ground rules 
and a standard modeling concept for 
performing effectiveness analyses that 
will permit the Air Force to be selec- 
tive between proposals and to compare 
one to the other, using a common, base 
line. For the first time, management 
will be able to follow the analyst step 
by step through the analysis process, 
check his data and its course, re- 
view his assumptions and insure that 
he works from the agreed upon point 
of departure. After a system has been 
selected from several proposals, these 
same techniques can then be applied 
to the selection of components or sub- 



systems within a weapon system and, 
later on in the life cycle, to evaluate 
proposed changes or modifications. 

After the system becomes opera- 
tional, the same analytical approach 
can provide a rational basis for selec- 
tion between alternative solutions to 
operational and support problems. 
For example, if the in-commission 
rate is falling below acceptable stand- 
ards, should the commander request 
additional maintenance personnel or 
test equipment? Or should he provide 
special training to upgrade his as- 
signed personnel? Or should he ad- 
monish his crews for abusing {over- 
stressing') their equipment? Or does 
he have a more subtle problem 
morale? 

Eapid and economic analysis can 
assist in solving these and a host of 
other related and interacting prob- 
lems. An especially attractive and 
promising feature of the analytical 
framework proposal by the advisory 
committee is its ability to deal 
with constantly changing situations, 
changes in missions and changes with- 
in a mission. This technique consid- 
ers the implications imposed by the 
multistate, multimode, multimission 
characteristics deemed so desirable in 
modern weapons systems. 

The advisory committee also pro- 
vided a number of significant recom- 
mendations in the area of system 
effectiveness and cost effectiveness 
evaluations; and it recommended im- 
provements in our maintenance data 
collection system necessary to support 
system effectiveness analysis. But for 
cost data to support the cost effective- 
ness analyses, the committee by-and- 
large looked to another Systems Com- 
mand study program. This latter ef- 
fort is known as the Management In- 
formation System Project; it pro- 
ceeded concurrently with and inter- 
meshed closely with WSELAC, 

The Management Information Sys- 
tem Project was established to en- 
hance the posture of the AFSC in the 
area of cost estimating credibility 
by developing improved financial man- 
agement procedures, A basic deficiency 
in the past has been the lack of a 
system for pyramiding of financial 
data, all having a common structure, 



auditable from the lowest data bit to 
the highest summary aggregation and 
acceptable at all levels of review 
within the Air Force and the Office 
of the Secretary of Defense. To al- 
leviate these problems, the Manage- 
ment Information System Project has 
provided three new procedures: 

First is a cost estimating pro- 
cedure which provides uniform meth- 
ods for presenting estimates and for 
tracing changes in estimates. In ad- 
dition to enabling a more sophisti- 
cated analysis of contractor estimates, 
the procedure will improve our abil- 
ity to make independent cost estimates 
in-house. It provides for documenta- 
tion of all informatin used in formu- 
lating the estimates including- data 
sources, estimating relationships, esti- 
mate confidence and statement of esti- 
mate results. 

Second is a cost information sys- 
tem which is essentially a contractor 
reporting system. It provides a uni- 
form method to display contract 
status in financial terms. It estab- 
lishes basic contractor financial data 
inpuh for development of budget esti- 
mates, financial plans, program 
change proposals and the contrsictor'g 
response to the request for proposal 
(RFP). Also, it provides input to out 
cost data bank for use in developing 
cost estimates or conducting cost ef- 
fectiveness analyses. 

Third is a cost accompli shmcnl 
system which is an adaptation oi 
Program Evaluation Review Tech- 
nique (PERT) cost into a nysten 
moro usable by the contractor aiic 
by our system program office (SPQ! 
for program management. It provide; 
for early visibility by the aysten 
program office of potential problems 
thus avoiding contract overruns, 

With the WSELAC and the Man 
agement Information System Project 
wo believe the necessary ground worl 
has been established for improvin] 
the System Command's competonc 
for performing system effectivenca 
and cost effectiveness analyses. 

The need for effectiveness analyse 
in the conceptual and definition phase 
has been recognized for some time 
Our 375 series of regulations an< 
manuals address the matter rathe 
directly, They describe managemen 
and engineering procedures to max: 
mize total system/cost effectiveness 
It remains for Systems Command t 
integrate the WSELAC methodolog 
into the appropriate Systems Coir 

(Continued on Page Ik 



10 



February 196 



*_ T.JF S ' 

I 3 4 5 

1 10 11 12 
17 18 19 
1 24 25 2B 


S M T W, T F S 


S M T W T F S 


13345 

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 
13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 
27 28 29 30 31 


1 2 
3 4 5 6 7 B 9 

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 

24 25 26 27 28 28 30 


T#l 966 Slffi l$i;*? MARC H i l.966&#& 1 i^KffAPRI tM 966' Wm 



SPEAKERS CALENDAR 



OF THE SECRETARY 
OF DEFENSE 

aim M. Malloy, Dep. Asst. 
of Defense (Procurement) 
rnent Contracts Symposium, 
Fla., March 3-4. 

B. Petty, Dir., Defense 
-Yudit Agency, at Third An- 
:h eastern Government Pro- 
Symposium, Orlando, Fin,, 

B. Lynn, Dep. for Audit 
int, Defense Contract Audit 
t American Society for Pub- 
listrators Meeting, Albany, 
rch 29. 

rcii. J. H. Weiner, USAP, 
Staff, Defense Communica- 
ncy, at Armed Forces Corn- 
is Electronics Assn. Meet- 
iiore, Md., April 12. 

T. Cook, Dep. Dir., Defense 

Audit Agency, at National 

Management Assn. Sym- 

:>s Angeles, Calif., April IB. 

MENT OF THE ARMY 

irold K. Johnson, Chief of 
. Army, at Boston Univer- 
iiguished Speakers Series, 
ass., Feb. 24. 

auk S. Bosson, Jr., Com- 
leneral, U.S. Army Materiel 

at 8th Joint Indus try-Mil- 
rnment Packaging Mater-i- 
ll i ng and Transportation 
n, Sheraton Park Hotel, 
11, D.C. Feb. 28; at Western 
hib, Chicago, 111., March 21. 

William F, Cussidy, Chief 
ingineers, at American Con- 
Surveying & Mapping/ 
Society of Photogrammetry 
E-Iilton Hotel, Washington, 
h 9. 

11, Austin W. Belts, Dep. 
Research and Development, 
University, Houston, Tex,, 

i. David P. Gibbs, Chief of 
itions-Electronics, at Armed 
oinmunications Electronics 
ting, Fort Monmouth, N.J., 



NrtENT OF THE NAVY 

bert N. Morse, Asst. Soc- 
the Navy (Research and 
nt) at Commissioning of 
3OKE (DEG-1), Seattle, 
b. 26, 

[. Rivcro, Vice Chief of 
rations, at National Secur- 



ity Commission, American Legion, 
Washington, D.C., March 2. 

KAdm. H. J. P. Foley, Asst. Chief, 
Bureau of Supplies and Accounts, at 
Southern States Regional Traffic Safe- 
ty Conference, Chattanooga, Tenn., 
March 9. 

VAdm. Charles B. Murtell, Dir., 

ASW Programs, Office of Chief of 
Naval Operations, at Naval Reserve 
Assn. Luncheon, Washington, D.C., 
March IB; at American Society for 
Quality Control, Los Angeles, Calif., 
March 22; at NROTC Convocation, 
Purdue University, North Lafayette, 
Ind., April 18. 

VAdm P. H. RaniHcy, Deputy Chief 
of Naval Operations (Air), at Gen- 
eral Dynamics/Fort Worth Manage- 
ment Dinner, Fort Worth, Tex., April 



DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Lt. Gen. T. P. Gerrlty, Dep. Chief 

of Staff (Systems &. Logistics), at Na- 
tional Security Seminar, Carbondala, 
111., March 31-April 1. 

Gen. II, A. Schriever, Commander 
Air Force Systems Command, at 
American Society for Public Adminis- 
tration, Washington, D.C., April 14; 
at American Ordnance Assn. Meeting-, 
Washington, D.C., May 5. 

Lt. Gen. R. L, Bohaimon, Surgeon 
General, at Aerospace Medical Assn. 
Meeting, Lag Vegas, Nov., April 18-21. 

Maj. Gen. John W. O'Neill, Com- 
mander, Electronic Systems Division, 
Air Force Systems Command, at Na- 
tional Telemetering Conference, Bos- 
ton, Mass., May 10. 



Army Engineers Given 
Cement Testing Tasks 

The Army Corps of Engineers has 
assumed the function of procurement 
testing cement for Federal Govern- 
ment agencies, a service previously 
performed by the National Bureau of 
Standards. 

The job involves sampling and test- 
ing cement furnished by contractors 
for use in construction projects being 
performed by the Army Department 
and other Federal agencies including 
the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and 
the Navy's Bureau of Yards and 
Docks. 

Sampling and testing activities 
have been assigned to three Corps of 
Engineer field facilities, each of 
which will serve geographic areas as 

follows: 

North Pacific Div., Army Corps of 
Engineers, Portland, Ore. Montana, 
Wyoming, Utah, Arizona, Nevada, 
Washington, Oregon and California. 

Ohio River Div., Army Corps of En- 
gineers, Cincinnati, Ohio All states 
oast of, and including, North Dakota, 
South Dakota and Nebraska and all 
states north of, and including Mis- 
souri, Tennessee and Virginia. 

U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Ex- 
periment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. 
Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Okla- 
homa, Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, 
Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, North 
Carolina, South Carolina and Florida. 



AF Begins Development 

of Automatic Field 

Telephone 

Development of an advanced auto- 
matic radio telephone system specially 
adapted for military use in forward 
areas has boon started by the Air 
Force Systems Command's Electronic 
Systems Division at L.G. Hanscorn 
Field, Mass. ' 

Designed to be carried manually, 
the system will have a rugged con- 
figuration that will permit it to bo 
air dropped and operated almost any- 
where in the world under the most 
severe weather conditions, 

_ Each system will provide for 14 
simultaneous conversations with up to 
200 connections over an area five miles 
in diameter. 

Without its battery, each hand set 
will weigh about 15 pounds while the 
repeater or nerve center od! the system 
will scale about 100 pounds, distrib- 
uted into three back packs. 

The new design will provide pri- 
vate, high quality voice communica- 
tions that can be instantly set up, 
dismantled and relocated in accord- 
ance with military requirements. 

Present timetable calls for delivery 
of a prototype by December 19G6 to 
be followed by rigorous field testing: 
to simulate combinations of extreme 
temperatures, humidity 'and wind- 
blown sand and dust. 



ndustry Bulletin, 




The North American Air Defense 
Command (NORAD) will undergo an 
overall reorganization of its Air 
Force, Army and Royal Canadian Air 
Force components effective April 1. 

The realignment is in consonance 
with the changing emphasis of the 
major threat to North America i from 
manned bombers to ballistic missiles 
and overall improvements being made 
to the air defense weapons control 
system. 

Revamping of NORAD and its com- 
ponents coincides with the acquisition 
of an improved back-up interceptor 
control (BUIC) system. The improved 
BUIC system is a dispersed, auto- 
mated weapon control system which, 
coupled with the semi-automatic 
ground environment (SAGE) system, 
increases flexibility of the manned 
bomber defense and gives greater 
assurance that sufficient air defense 
capability will survive a ballistic mis- 
sile attack to effectively counter the 
Dimmed bomber threat. 

North American Air Defense Com- 
mand. 

The reshuffle calls for the realign- 
ment of the six numbered regions into 
four geographically designated areas 
to be called Western, Central, South- 
ern and Eastern NORAD regions. 'I he 
Alaskan NORAD region, headquar- 
tered at Elmendorf AFB, Alaska, and 
the Northern NOBAD region, head- 
quartered at North Bay, Ontario, 
Canada, will be retained. The city- 
named NORAD sectors will be re- 
designated as numerical divisions. 

New regional sectors, their head- 
quarters and changes to take place 
follow: 

Western NORAD Region, Headquar- 
tersHamilton APB, Calif. The new 
Western NORAD Region will encom- 
pass the area and forces of the 28th 
NOBAD Region at Hamilton and the 
26th NORAD Region at McChord 
AFB, Wash. 

The 26th NORAD Region, the Reno 
Sector with headquarters at Stead 
APB, Nov., and the Los Angeles 
NORAD Sector with headquarters at 
Norton AFB, Calif., will be inacti- 
vated and the semi-automatic ground 
environment (SAGE) facilities asso- 
ciated with these units phased out. 
These control functions will be trans- 
ferred to the SAGE facility at Hamil- 
ton AFB and to the new BUIC 
facilities. 

Western NORAD Region will con- 
sist of the Seattle NORAD Sector 
which will be redesignated as the 
26th NORAD Division; the Portland 
NORAD Sector, redesignated as the 



12 



26th NORAD Division, to encompass 
the area and forces of the present 
Reno Sector; and the Phoenix 
NORAD Sector, redesignated as the 
27th NORAD Division, encompassing 
the area and forces of the present 
Los Angeles Sector. 

Central NORAD Region, Headquar- 
ters Richards-Gebaur AFB, Mo. The 
Central Region will replace the 29th 
NORAD Region and will encompass 
the area and forces now assigned to 
the 30th NORAD Region at Truax 
AFB, Wis., which will be inactivated. 

Central NORAD Region will be 
composed of the Great Falls NORAD 
Sector which will be redesignated the 
28th NORAD Division; the Duluth 
NORAD Sector redesignated the 29th 
NORAD Division ; the Sioux City 
NORAD Sector redesignated the 
30th NORAD Division; and the Chi- 
cago NORAD Sector redesignated the 
20th NORAD Division. 

Southern NORAD Region, Head- 
quarters Gunter AFB, Ala. The 
Southern NORAD Region will replace 
the 32nd NOKAD Region, and will be 
composed of the forces assigned to 
the Montgomery NORAD Sector, 
which will be redesignated at 32nd 
NORAD Division; and the Oklahoma 
City NORAD Sector, which will be 
redesignated from the present 29th 
NOI1AD Region to the 31st NORAD 
Division. 

Eastern NORAD Region, Headquar- 
ters Stewart AFB, N. Y. The East- 
ern NORAD Region will replace the 
26th NORAD Region. It will be com- 
posed of the Washington NORAD 
Sector, redesignated the 33rd NORAD 
Division; the Detroit NORAD Sector, 
redesignated the 34th NORAD Divi- 
sion; the Boston NORAD Sector re- 
designated the 35th NORAD Division; 
and the New York NORAD Sector 
redesignated the 21st NORAD Divi- 
sion. 

U. S. Air Force Air Defense Com- 
mand. 

Reorganization of the U. S. Air 
Force Air Defense Command (ADC) 
parallels the NORAD structure within 
the continental United States. ADC 
will establish four numbered air 
forces to replace the numbered ADC 
air divisions and will redesignate the 
geographically named ADC sectors as 
numbered air divisions. 

Numbered air forces to be estab- 
lished are the 4th at Hamilton AFB, 
Calif; 10th at Richards-Gebaur AFB, 
Mo.; 1st at Stewart AFB, N. Y.; and 



14th at Gunter AFB, Ala. The com- 
manders of the Eastern, Southern and 
Central NORAD regions also will 
command the numbered air force co- 
located at the same base, 

Changing the designation of the 
sectors to numbered air divisions is 
being done to make the organization 
of ADC consistent with the structure 
of other USAF major air commands 
such as the Tactical Air Command 
and Strategic Air Command. The 
numbers assigned to the ADC air 
divisions will be identical to those of 
the NORAD divisions and both will 
be commanded by the same individual. 

U.S. Army Air Defense Command. 

The U. S. Army Air Defense Com- 
mand (ARADCOM) will realign its 
boundaries on April 1 as part of the 
overall reorganization of NOUAD, 
ARADCOM will reduce its number of 
region commands from five to four 
and will establish new geographical 
areas of responsibility for three of the 
regions. Two region headquarters will 
be moved. 

Areas of responsibility of the four 
ARADCOM regions will conform to 
boundaries of NORAD regions within 
the United States. 

Headquarters of 1st Region, ARAD 
COM, will remain initially at Fort 
Totten, N. Y., and present boundaries 
will be retained. In the fourth quarter 
of Fiscal Year 1907, this headquar- 
ters will move to Stewart AFIJ, N. Y., 
to co-locate it with the headquarters 
of Eastern NORAD region. 

Sixth Region, ARADCOM, will re- 
main headquarters at Fort Baker, 
Calif., but its area will be enlarged 
to include 7th Region, ARADCOM, 
at McChord AFB, Wash. The 7tli will 
bo discontinued. The commander of 
the Western NORAD Region will also 
be the 6th Region comrflander. 

Second Region, ARADCOM, will 
keep its headquarters at Richardfi- 
Gebaur AFB, Mo. The boundaries of 
the reconfigured 2nd Region will co- 
incide with those of the Central 
NORAD Region. 

Headquarters of 4th Region, AIIAD 
COM, will be moved from Fort 
Sheridan, 111., initially to Maxwell 
AFB, Ala., and finally to Gunter AFB, 
Ala. The boundaries of the .recon- 
figured 5th Region will coincide with 
those of the Southern NORAD 
Region. 

RCAF Air Defense Command. 

RCAF Air Defense Command will 
be affected by the change in bounda- 
ries and rcdesignation of sectors in 
which units of the Canadian com- 
mand are located. 

February 1964 



Excerpts from address by Willis 
M, Hawkins, Asst Secretary of the 
Army (Research & Development), at 
the Association of the U.S. Army 
Symposium on Reconnaissance and 
Surveillance, Fort Huachuca, Ariz., 
Jan, W> .1966. 




Hon. Willis M. Hawkins 

A Need for New Concepts 

for Surveillance 
and Target Acquisition 

. . . What I propose to do is discuss 
in a simplified way how I feel the 
surveillance and target acquisition 
mission fits into Army operations; to 
outline for you the status of our 
current concept efforts; touch lightly 
on the potential of various technical 
approaches that have been suggested; 
and, finally, outline in a very brief 
way some of the serious responsibil- 
ities which the Army, DOD and the 
industry must assume in order that 
wo can get on with development in 
a rational fashion, 

I hope in this discussion to empha- 
size one thing- and that is the futility 
of continuing to escalate the gather- 
ing of information even though we 
can conceive of many ingenious ways 
to sort and display it. We must return 
to a concept of handling only essential 
data. 

Army System Dependence on Enemy 
Information. 

In trying to discuss the system ap- 
proach to surveillance and target ac- 



quisition, we must remember that the 
system approach in the Anny is some- 
what different than the system ap- 
proach that has been so successful in 
analyzing strategic systems. ... I 
would like to suggest, however, that 
the Army in its entirety is, in fact, 
one system and the subsystems which 
make it up cover a variety of func- 
tions and operations in a complex and 
necessarily flexible manner. 

As we turn to the reconnaissance 
problem and the systems we would 
like to have to solve this problem, I 
think we will note that most of these 
systems actually work in one of two 
modes. In one case, these subsystems 
are short lead time closed loop sys- 
tems and, in the other, the lead times 
are so great that they are, to a first 
approximation, open loop arrange- 
ments, In order to describe what I 
mean by the closed loop open loop 
breakdown, I would like to discuss 
first the closed loop type of reconnais- 
sance system. These are tho systems 
that have the following specific pur- 
poses; 

The location and description of 
enemy combat elements. 

Real time fh'c direction. 

Kcal time damage assessment. 

Surveillance of combat troop and 
equipment movement. 

You will recognize in this list that 
I have attempted to seek out those 
functions where the local commander 
is immediately responsible for the 
action and reaction to the informa- 
tion. This is what I call closed loop. 

Let us now take a look at what I 
mean by open loop or long lead sys- 
tems. In this particular case the sys- 
tems do the following: 

Define the environment for po- 
tential battle including permanent 
features of geography of the zone of 
combat. 

Determine the long range poten- 
tial of the enemy such as the change 
of his support or relief elements, or 
the onset of major buildup. 

Locate and describe logistical 
and facility targets. 



Long range damage assessment. 

As you see from a comparison of 
these two groups, the closed loop por- 
tion is characterized by immediate 
action and reaction resulting from 
information gained. Open loop is 
characterized as foundation informa- 
tion for future operation and care- 
fully planned interdiction. 

Status of Concept Development, 

Keeping in mind the closed loop and 
open loop groupings that I have just 
outlined, I would now like to discuss 
where we stand with respect to our 
development of concepts. Historically, 
sensor development has generally 
lagged vehicle development, if vehi- 
cles are involved in the system, and 
both/ unfortunately, have preceded 
logical overall reconnaissance system 
concept creation. This has put the 
commander in a position of having to 
develop his own systems concepts in 
the field using the tools at hand. 
Being ingenious, a number of tactics 
have been developed, not the least of 
which is reconnaissance by fire. This 
is a firm tactical concept and is an 
extremely useful one. It probably ac- 
counts for the lions share^f target 
acquisition in situations such as we 
are experiencing in Vietnam. The 
utter simplicity of tho concept cannot 
be denied but certainly the cost In 
lives and the lack of precision should 
be a challenge to every technical man. 
There must be a better way of finding 
the enemy than standing up to see 
who shoots at you. 

I would like to suggest that those 
of us, who attempt to work in the 
concept creation part of the business, 
might better have spent our time in 
the past with careful analysis of tho 
field commanders' functions as a 
starting point for creating surveil- 
lance and target acquisition systems. 
We have to decide "the following : 

At what level in the command 
organization must the quick reaction 
systems close the loop? I'd like to sug- 
gest that we have tended to put this 
level too high, 

How much raw data does a field 
commander really need? How much 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



13 



I am talking about. It is obvious that 
this immediately suggests the vast 
computer I have just described. What 
I want to suggest is some sort of "at 
source" correlation that sends only 
correlated information to the com- 
mander. Another technical scheme, 
that might be used in some kind of 
correlative system, is the sampling of 
air. Devices to do this successfully 
are beginning to emerge from our 
laboratories. The importance of such 
a capability, utilized cither by the in- 
fantryman or in aircraft, is yet to be 
determined. 

There is one kind of correlation and 
filter scheme, which is now in develop- 
ment, that illustrates some of the 
characteristics that I have been ex- 
plaining. We call it VATLS, or Visual 
Airborne Target Location System. In 
this system we use the eyeball and 
brain of an observer in an aircraft, 
who utilizes a telescope on an inertial 
reference platform aided by ground 
tracking (developed from missile con- 
trol system), All that is transmitted 
to the ground is the elevation angle, 
azimuth, altitude and range, relative 
to the aircraft, of targets sighted by 
the observer, The tracking system 
locates the observing aircraft and 
closes the loop to determine the ac- 
curate location of the target. The 
system is moderately complex, but it 
has the extreme advantage of maxi- 
mum simplicity in data handling in 
that it relieves the commander of any 
filtering task. The system, in fact, can 
relieve the commander of involvement 
in the weapon system loop, if the sys- 
tem is hooked to the artillery or is 
used to command support aircraft. 

We have many subsystems operat- 
ing in the field that are not directly 
linked together for mutual support. 
Obvious in this area a-re systems 
which provide electronic intelligence- 
to a very high and, sometimes isolated, 
element of command. This informa- 
tion could be classified as "trigger" 
mission intelligence; and it must some- 
how be more closely linked to quick 
response or spot systems which obtain 
correlation information of different 
lands, or, perhaps, directly to 
weapons, 

The consideration of combined sys- 
tems inevitably brings up the problem 
of intorservice responsibilities in any 
kind of a tactical operation. Tn the 
discussion of these systems, the "fed- 
eration" suggested by Dr. Fubini, in 
our discussions over the past few 



years, seems to me to be a concept in 
which the potential is very large. The 
prime danger, in contemplating com- 
bined systems, is that we will attempt 
to so thoroughly integrate all the 
elements that the resulting system is 
too complex and, therefore, there can 
be only one. This reduces the flexibil- 
ity so necessary on the high intensity 
battlefield, and even more essential 
to accomplish intelligence-gathering 
in low level and counterinsurgency 
types of conflict. Therefore, in think- 
ing of combined systems, we must be 
careful not to create unique monsters, 
but to try to create tactical command 
systems, which hav ethe potential of 
a complex combined system or the 
individual effectiveness of the subsys- 
tems as the case determines. 

Before closing our discussion of the 
potential of our present technical 
capability, I should like to point out 
the obvious fact that none of the cur- 
rent completed developments have 
attacked the problem of handling the 
display, the filtering, or the sorting 
for easy decision by the commander, I 
have been emphasising the desirability 
of correlating and filtering the infor- 
mation so that he gets only what he 
needs. We all know how difficult this 
is going to be, We know that, if asked, 
he will want flexibility; therefore, ho 
will want some excess information in 
order to bo confident that he has 
enough, No matter bow much filtering 
we do at the source, we must certainly 
do something in the area of logical 
information display to show the com- 
bat commander what he needs a lot 
faster and more clearly. Certainly 
there is more than we can do beyond 
worn out maps and crayons. A simple 
idea here, I believe, will do us a great 
deal of good, 

Specific Responsibilities in Concept 
Development. 

All of us involved in the effort to 
create the best possible reconnais- 
sance and surveillance systems have 
individual responsibilities. They ob- 
viously can't be defined in sucli a 
mannre that there is no overlap, but 
there are certain areas of responsi- 
bilities that are unique to the large 
organizations attempting to develop 
these systems,' I would like to suggest 
the following: 

Army responsibility. In the Army 
we have recognized that we are, in 
fact, the only organization that can 
write the requirements for these 
systems. We arc the ones who demand 



the information and who must n-ad 
to it. So far our definition of thi-iir 
requirements has failed to he a rc-iil 
definition, and we must recognise our 
responsibility to do something' hrllrr 
than the routine listing of livery- 
body's desire for information us a 
basis for requirements. I him; hrni 
talking about filters throughout (.|ij>i 
discussion. I recognize that it in tin- 
Army's responsibility to put a filter 
on its requirements so that thorn- \vlrn 
do the development have a Hpiridi 1 
problem to attack. 

I think the Army, in the dovclop 
mcnt of requirements, should try In 
set up some experimental operntiuiis, 
We have attempted to develop many 
detailed military tactics through tin- 
use of operational tests, but wo him* 
not attacked the surveillance and lur- 
get acquisition function in any SJHTJ- 
fie operational test. This may hi 1 n 
long program but I think it in nn 
essential one, and we should approach 
its planning now. 

The Army must certainly tumly/,!- 
its security rules to ace if \w luivr 
any information-gathering syKU'iiiti 
artifically hidden behind closed doom 
in such a manner that thn oiiLpul- in 
not available for immediate i-nHiionm- 
by operational commanders. 

Finally, I recognize that the Army 
has a distinct responsibility to nn 
semble the best possible concept y;i 
terns talent, in order to combine many 
individual technical development:-! mid 
ideas into operational systems wlmiv 
the combined capabilities of tliiv vnri 
ous technical devices arc w]<Uxl In 
gcther in optimum ways. 

Industry responsibility. For lliii;ii< 
of you in 1 industry, I think that then' 
arc several major responsiliilit,itt 
which you should consider, I wiuild 
like to suggest that you first look tit, 
your gadget peddlers. I know thiil 
many of you feel that the Government 
is peculiarly blind when it comi'H In 
looking at new ideas. I felt that wtiy 
myself when I was in industry. I umv 
have 'a different view of the problem 
and I would like to admit that the 
Government is not all ininnmr to 
strong sales effort, and it has too uflmi 
succumbed to clever but actually iu<< 
less ideas. These ideas rarely cmnr In 
complete fruition because they iivrn- 
tually die in the light of reason. Tln-y 
have in the process, however, absuii-hi'd 
a substantial amount of talent and 
attention, and the same tcchnit'iil 
people could have been creators hail 



Defense Industry Bulletin, 



fat instrument rarely cuts through 
anything. Yet with each new proj- 
ect, our System Project Offices 
(SPO) get bigger. If we aren't care- 
ful, we will become the victims of 
Parkinson's fourth and newest law, 
namely: "Any group of 1,000 or more 
generates enough activity within itself 
that it needs no contact with the out- 
side world." 

I have been flippant on this subject, 
but there is a serious side to it. As 
we seek to impose more responsibility 
on our industrial contractors, through 
fewer cost type contracts and with 
terms arrived at in competition, wo 
must descipline ourselves to couple 
l,hat responsibility with tlio authority 
needed to carry it out. 

Responsibility and authority are 
twins and, if we require industry to 
accept responsibility, we must not 
withhold the authority to fullfill it. 
Yon may have heard of the "total 
package" concept with which we are 
experimenting on the C-5A program 
and which, if successful, we intend to 
apply to other programs such as the 
Short Range Attack Missile (SRAM). 
Stripped to its essentials, the total 
package plan is intended to permit 
the award of contracts competitively, 
where performance and schedule are 
related to cost, and on a basis of 
total responsibility. These are the key 
words. We in the Government have 
for many years been living in an 
atmosphere of "cost-plus and sole 
source," where more controls by the 
customer are needed; and this re- 
linquishmimt of authority will, for 
many, be a shocking experience. But 
it must be done if we arc to get the 
best results performance, schedule 
and cost from our industrial part- 
ners; and you are the ones who will 
have to do it. 

While methods change, and nations 
change and world situations change, 
there is one constant the need "to 
provide for the common defense" 
the need to protect the substance of 
past achievements and the means for 
future accomplishments. 

The great challenge before us lies 
in managing our resources in such 
a way as to derive the maximum 
benefits from the application of sci- 
ence and technology to our defense 
needs. A major share of this man- 
agement task falls on the system/ 
project managers. 

Our national seciu-ity depends on 
our ability to act effectively through 



the entire spectrum of conflict, 
whether it is confined to the psycho- 
logical-political-economic area, wheth- 
er it brings on a number of "brush 
fire" wars, or whether it bursts into 
a major non-nuclear or into an all- 
out general war. I think it is fair to 
say that the danger of general nu- 
clear war is receding, largely because 
of the strength and readiness of our 
strategic forces. At the same time, 
the danger of lesser conflict the 
euphemistic "war of liberation" is 
increasing. 

A few months ago, there was an 
article written by Lin Piao, Vice 
Premier of Red China. That article 
states quite frankly not only what 
Peking's intentions are in Asia, not 
only what Peking's intentions are in 
Vietnam, not only what Peking's inten- 
tions are toward the United States, 
but what Peking's plans are for the 
expansion of world commnnism, 

Lin Piao makes this interesting 
point, The Chinese Communist revolu- 
tion differs from the Russian revolu- 
tion in one essential respect. The Rus- 
sian revolution "began with armed 
uprisings in the cities, and then 
spread to the countryside," he notes, 
"while the Chinese revolution won 
nationwide victory through the en- 
circlement of the cities from the rural 
areas and the final capture of the 
cities." 

And here is the kicker: the "rural 
areas of the world" today, Lin Piao 
asserts, 'are Asia, Africa and Latin 
America. The "cities of the world" 
are North America and Western 
Europe. 

Just as communism in China suc- 
ceeded by first capturing the coun- 
tryside, then encircling and absorbing 
the cities, so will the global commu- 
nist movement ultimately succeed first 
by capturing Asia, Africa and Latin 
America, thereby encircling North 
America- and Western Europe. Then, 
says Lin Piao, the United States and 
its allies will be ready for annihila- 
tion, 

And where is all this to begin? It 
has already begun, he replies. That 
place is in Vietnam, Vietnam, he 
says, is the "focus" of the revolu- 
tionary movement. No matter what 
action the United States may take in 
Vietnam, he insists, the Communist 
Chinese are "unshakable" in their de- 
termination to drive the United States 
out of Southeast Asia, 

Lest anyone doubt that the North 



Vietnamese disciples are taking cw-\ 
from their Chinese mentors, we havr 
this recent statement of General Oinp, 
the experienced leader of North Viet' 
nam's army: "If the special warfare 
that the U.S. imperialists arts 
in South Vietnam is overcomit," 
says, "then it can be defeated every- 
where in the world." 

Obviously, we must be prepared for 
a variety of contingencies in lliln 
troubled world. While this country 
can afford whatever is needed Tor <)<> 
fense, we cannot afford to wnsli; any 
of our resources, This is why synti'iii'u 
management is so vitally imporhuil. 
and why the roles which you will 
play in the years ahead will be de- 
cisive. 

Within a few days you will iilrirl 
again on the daily collision cmmir 
with the problems of men and re 
sources. From now on, throughout 
your careers, you will have imiKn-si 
sively greater responsibilities in Hit- 
direction of man and the use of inn 
terial. I would caution you about only 
one aspect of your responsibililinn 
that of overmartagemcnt. By HUH ! 
mean, not only overcontrol of indus- 
trial contractors, to which I vuforrnl 
earlier, but also any rigidity of nm 
trol of the actions of the subordiimlrM 
and of the functions under your di- 
rection. The loss of an Army nmli> 
few decades ago was a serioun bind 
ness Lincoln said they were mmr 
expensive to replace than gdniinilu, 
But the loss of a mule then docti itol 
compare with the loss of ones of tu 
day's prime movers. The samo ralln 
applies to every item of equipment 
throughout the military establishment. 

rt is common experience to li'iirii 
more from our mistakes than from 
our successes, for painful WTWU 
sharpen the senses while triumpliri 
can dull them. You would not IMS In 
this class if you were not alilu I." 
profit from your errors, and it, |*t 
highly possible that you would nut 
be here had not a superior mum-' 
where along the line judged you worth 
saving, despite at least otic mtl 
blooper. I ask that, as you movd into 
the upper echelons of your Servirrx, 
you do likewise with juniors who im* 
worthy of the effort. Let them liMirit 
from mistakes in positions of liwit'i' 
responsibility so that they will nmkf 
fewer when they are in the BOM tor 
councils 'where the cost of errnrw IK 
astronomically higher. 



Defense Industry Bulletin, 



APRIL 

Conference on Ground Based Aero- 

iteseaiui *-. f\H awa , Canada. 
Hahment (DlUfc), -^^T-rnhvidire 
Co-sponsors: Air Force Cambudffe 
Laboratories an d DULL. 



ext. 3019. 

Symposium on Generalized Net- 
worV Hth in a series of interna- 
tional symposia organized by the 
Pnlvteclmc Institute of mooKiyn 
Micmvave Research Institute, April 
12-^4 at New York City. Sponsors: 
Air Force Office of Scientific Re- 
search, Office of Naval. Research, 
Army Research Office, Society for In- 
dus Sal and Applied Mathematics an 
the Institute for Electrical f*** 
Ironies Engineers. Contact: LI. uji. ^. 
p GnlneS, Jr. CSREE), Air Force 
Office of Scientific Research, Tempo 
D 4th St. and Independence Ave., 
sV, Washington, D.C. 20383, (Area 
Code 202) OXford 8-3G71. 

Fourth Symposium on Hcmotc 
Sensing of Environment, April li-ii, 
at the University of Michigan Ann 
Arbor, Mich. Co-sponsors: Air I'orce 
Cambridge Research Laboratories and 
Office of Naval Research. Contact, 
G B. Molineux (CRJT), Air .Force 
Cambridge Research Laboratories, b. 
G. Hanscom Field, Mass. 01731, 
(Area Code 617) CR 4-6100, cxt. 
3620. 

Twentieth . Annual Frequency Con- 
trol Symposium, April 19-21, at the 
Shelburne Hotel, Atlantic City, N.J. 
Sponsor: Army Electronics Labora- 
Ss. Contact: M. F Timm Solid 
State & Frequency Control Div., 
Army Electronics Laboratories, i'ori 
Monrnouth, N.J., (Area Code 201) 
5-1728. 

Mathematical Aspects of Computer 
Science, dates undetermined, at Now 
York City. Sponsors: Air Force Office 
of Scientific Research, Army Research 
Office-Durham, Institute for Defense 
Analysis, Association for Computing 
Machinery, Association for Symbolic 
Logic and the American Mathemat- 
ical Society. Contact; Capt. J. Jones, 
Jr. (SRMA.), Air Force Office of Sci- 
entific Research, Tempo D, 4th St. and 
Independence Ave., S.W., Washing- 
ton, D.C. 20333, (Area Code 202) Ox- 
ford 6-1302. 



MAY 

Symposium on Electrode r**> 
Mav 1-6, at Cleveland, Ohio Co- 
Ssors; Ah" Force Office of Sc.cn- 
Bftc Research and the Electronical 
Society. Contact: Lt. Col. M. 1). 
SpHnkel (SRC), Air Foree Office of 
Scientific Research ,'lempo D, 4th bt 
:md Independence Avo., S.W, WaM - 
ngton, D.C. 2038S, (Area Code 202), 
OXford fi-8706. 

Bionics Symposium 19GB, May Il-B, 
at the Sheraton Hotel, Dayton, Ohio 
(rescheduled from March . Co-spon- 
sors: Aerospace Medical Ucsomth 
Laboratory and the Avionics Lab- 
oratory. Contact: Dr. H. L. Orihl- 
rcicher (MUBAM), Aerospace: Mod- 
Si Research Laboratory, Wngh - 
Patterson AFB, Ohio, (Area Code 
513) 253-7111, oxt. 3-0108. 

Ninth Navy Science Symposium, 
May 6-6, at Departmental ^ Al ^~ 
um. Constitution Avo., between Uth 
and 14th Streets, N.W, Washington, 
D.C. Sponsor: Office of Nava Re- 
search. Contact: Robert . I. M.ndak 
Conference Chairman, Office of Nav.il 
Research, Department of the Navy, 
Washington, D.C. 20360, (Area Codo 
202), OXford fi-4720. 



International Conference on Crystal 
Growth, June 20-24, at Boston, Mass. 
Sponsor: Air Force Cambridge Re- 
search Laboratories. Contact: Mr, 
Charles S. Sahagian (CHWPC) Air 
Force Cambridge Research Labnrn- 
torios, L. G. Hanscom Field, Maaa. 
017S1, (Ami Code 617). Ctt 4-fiiOO, 
ext. 3298. 

Second Rochester Conference on 
Coherence and Quantum Optics Juno 
22-24, tit the University of KochcHlcr, 
NY. Co-sponsors: Air Force Oftlce ul 
Scientific Research and the Air Force 
Cambridge Research Lnl)r:aoi-ics. 
Contact: Dr. M. C. 1J^':">^^ 
(SUPP), Air Force Office of Scientific 
Research, Tempo D, 4th St. imd In- 
dependence Ave. S.W., WiishmKlo". 
IXC 2oS, (Area Code 202) OX fowl 
6-4 4 64. 

Cold Spring Harbor Synniosiuin on 
OuiuUitiitive IlioloRy, dates imdler- 
mincd, at Cold Sprmg Harbor, N^ . 
Sponsors: Cold Spnng Uburnli>ry foi- 
Quantitativo Biology, Air l;<m* onice 
of Scientific Tlosonrch, NntHjini Insti- 
tutes f Health, Nalioiuil Srionct- 
Poimdution and the Atonm- H - r &[' 
ConimiHskm. Contact: Dr. II. \. 
Hrown (SRLA), Air l'm: OOwre oC 
Scientific lle.icarch, Tomnp >, 'Uh M. 
and Independence Avo. S.W,, - 

iiiKton, D.C!. 20HSS, (Aron C-ocU; 
OXford (1-4181. 



JUNE 



Electromagnetic Windows Symposi- 
um, June 1-8. at the Georiii Injti- 

Uite of Technology, AtlanLa, (.a. 
Sponsor: Air Force Aviomcfl Ubori - 
tory. Contact: R. Ireland (AVWVrf), 
Ah' Force Avionics La Jomtory, 
Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio 4M, , , 
(Area Code 513) 253-7111, ext. 
5-5720. 

Fifth U.S. National Congress of 
Applied Mechanics, June 14-10, t 
the University of Minnesota, Minne- 
apolis, Minn. Sponsor: Air 1'orco 
Office of Scientific Research, Office ol 
Naval Research, Army Research 01- 
fice. American Physical Society, 
American Society of Civil H-ngincers, 
American Society of Mechanical hiv- 
Eineers for Experimental Stress 
Analysis, American Institute of Aero- 
nautics and Astronautics, American 
Mathematical Society, Society lor 
Rheaology and American Society foi 
Testing and Materials. Contact: Maj. 
Lawrence P. Monahan Jr., Army Re- 
search Office-Durham, Box CM, Duke 
Station, Durham, N.C. 27706, (Area 
Code 919) 286-2285. 



fronds in Systom and 

Cost Effoetlvonass Analysis 

(Continued from I'nffe 

mimd manixgement and 
documentation, but first wo mm 
verify and validate these procedure 
Tliis is being accomplished on si 
lectwl systems rcpccHentiiiK ent 
phasn of the weapon system It! 
cycle The techmnuen must h rcfini 
and improved; a bettor rinU ^ 
must be established; and, as wca 
nesses are recognised, rcscnrcli 
plug the gaps must be iiutmtcd. 

Above all, we must insure n motlw 
ology of effectiveness annlyfds \vhi 
avoids the clanger of dlBouroffe 1 
Air Force and the DOD from npnv, 
ing daring program approaches, sii 
these alone can give us the quail} 
, gains in military capability which; 
so vital to our national survival^. 

February V 




When the Defense Department 
spends a dollar toward building mod- 
ern weapons systems, little pieces of 
that dollar go into virtually every 
state in the nation affecting the econ- 
omy of thousands of cities, towns and 
communities. An example of the 
spread of defense dollars throughout 
the land is the history-milking sub- 
contracting programs of the Lockheed- 
Goorgia Co. of Marietta, Ga., a divi- 
sion of Lockheed Aircraft Corp., which 
i prime contractor for the latest giant 
cargo-troop carrying aircraft for the 
U.S. Air Force the; C-141 Starliftcr 
and the C-5A. 

The money being spout on these 
two ail-craft the total for airframos 
exceeds $2 billion (the engines, con- 
tracted separately to other firms, ex- 
ceed $.1 billion) isn't concentrated in 
the town of Marietta, Ga. Most of it 
fans out across the country to sub- 
contracting firms large aerospace cor- 
porations, small businesses and com- 
panies in labor surplus areas, who 
build large chunks of the new planes; 
or to vendors, who provide nuts and 
bolts, etc. Of the amount which the 
Marietta company retains "in house," 
it places .some in its own sub-assembly 
plants located, or being located, in 
Appalachia areas and elsewhere, and 
buys much raw material from other 
Georgia firms and companies in other 
states. 

It is impos.siblo to determine how 
many people make a living, or part 
of their living, from the Defense De- 
partment's programs on these two air- 
craft one of which is in full pro- 
duction and the other just preparing 
to go into production. Twenty-two 
thousand employees of. the Lockheed- 
Georgia Company come from half of 
the 159 counties of Georgia. This fig- 
ure also includes about 150 in a sub- 
assembly plant in Clarksburg, W. Va., 
and 300 or more in a sub-assembly 
plant at Charleston, S.C. Additional 
sub-assembly plants will be opened 
in Shclbyville, Tenn., Martinsburg, W. 
Va., Uniontown, Pa., and Logan, Ohio, 
Lockheed can count 1,200 compan- 
ies involved in the C-141 program. 
It currently is conducting, with Air 
Force review, competitive bidding- to 
select subcontractors for the C-fiA, 
an aircraft twice the size and twice 
the cost of the C-141. 



Major subcontractors and subsys- 
tems contracts on the Starlifter arc 
shared by 33 companies over the 
United States. Whatever the total of 
the employees of the subcontractors 
and vendors, who draw their pay- 
checks from funds derived from the; 
C-141, it can be multiplied by five 
to give a truer estimate of the num- 
ber whose livelihood is affected by 
this defense program. This is because 
in the communities involved there 
are grocers, clothiers, furniture deal- 
ers, realtors, barbers, gasoline service 
station operators, car dealers, ap- 
pliance dealers, etc., who feed, clothe, 
house and, generally, care for the 
needs of those who are working spe- 
cifically on defense contracts. 

So, when a dollar leaves Washing- 
ton, it travels far and wide -as' it in- 
volves thousands in building a weapon 
system for the Defense Department. 

Examples of the Plow of the De- 
fense Dollar in Subcontracting Pro- 
grams. 

After receiving the prime contract 
on the ail-frame of the C-141 from 
the Air Force Systems Command's 
Aeronautical Systems Division, Lock- 
heed's plant in Georgia sublet the 
wing to Avco Corp. in Nashville, 
Tenn., in competitive bidding. The 
wing includes a fuel pump. The Ten- 
nessee subcontractor, Avco, obtained 



the fuel pump from Pesco in Bed- 
ford, Ohio. To build the fuel pump, 
Pesco needed, among other things, a 
switch and a cannon plug. The Ohio 
firm bought the switch from the Micro 
Devices Co. of Dayton, Ohio, and the 
cannon plug from a concern in Los 
Angeles, Calif. 

At this point, the defense dollar 
really begins to How into commu- 
nities over the United States. Micro 
of Ohio gathers components for the 
switch from the following areas; wire, 
from Westbury, N.Y. ; glass, Shanton, 
Conn.; electrical material, Chicago 
and New York; disc, Cincinnati, Ohio; 
springs, Cincinnati; ceramics, Para- 
moit, Calif., and Sun Prairie, Wis,; 
cpoxy, Canton, Mass.; and silver from 
New York City. 

The Los Angeles firm providing the 
cannon plug for Pesco's fuel pump 
follows a similar pattern in obtaining 
components from companies spread 
out over the nation, 

Thus, the dollar for the Starlifter 
wing travels over Georgia, Tennessee, 
Ohio, California, New York, Connecti- 
cut, Illinois, Wisconsin, Massachusetts 
and other states. 

A tracing of the path of the de- 
fense dollar through the subcontract- 
ing and vending program involving 
other parts of the Starlifter would 
find it in virtually every state going 
from prime contractor to major sub- 
contractors into the third and fourth 
levels, to vendors and suppliers ad 
inftnitum, 

(Continued on Page 42) 




The U. S. Air Force's C-5A will present a rather sleek appearance when 
it goes into operation in 1980, as this artist's concept of two of them m flight 

indicates. 



Defense Industry Bulletin. 



The organization of corps and Army 
aviation companies is to be revised 
substantially so as to provide pooled 
aviation resources to serve the re- 
quirements of units located in the 
corps area, field army area and com- 
munications zone, as well as to rein- 
force divisions and other units having 
organic aviation. 

The extensive nature of the changes 
recommended by the ARCSA study 
will undoubtedly generate heated re- 
actions in some quarters in that this 
study represents a "bare bone" rather 
than an "optimum" statement of re- 
quirements for Army aviation. Never- 
theless, the study does represent ^the 
best possible assessment in the light 
of present-day knowledge geared to 
the other forces of the Army. On this 
basis the study provides a more solid 
foundation upon which the distilla- 
tion of new experience and increased 
knowledge can be applied. 

Despite the numerous changes rec- 
ommended by the AKCSA study, the 
overall quantitative requirements for 
aircraft and personnel to support the 
recommendations represent only minor 
changes from objectives previously 
stated by the Army. 

The other major change during the 
past year was the creation of an air- 
mobile division. Many lessons were 
learned from the air assault tests. 
One of the first things learned was 
the division's logistical impact and the 
amount of tonnage that would be 
handled. The average daily consump- 
tion for the division was 555 tons 
as compared to 450 for an infantry 



division. The main reason for the in- 
crease in tonnage is the requirement 
for additional aviation fuel. 

During Air Assault II we consumed 
almost three million gallons of POL. 
Total tonnage consumed was over 
18 000 tons. Movement of this ton- 
nage required 10,000 aircraft sorties, 
half of which were flown at night. 
The exercise showed that air lines 
of communication can be established 
in the combat zone and sustained 
over long periods of time to support 
an airmobile division. We also estab- 
lished that the speed with which an 
airmobile division can accomplish its 
mission indicates that it will consume 
50 percent less tonnage than an in- 
fantry division on a similar mission. 
Another lesson learned from the. 
air assault tests was the Army's ca- 
pability to maintain the large num- 
bers of aircraft. This was accom- 
plished with flying colors. The large 
ChinooUs were exposed to field con- 
ditions for the first time on a large 
scale and were available fiO percent 
of the time. The Mohawk had almost 
80 percent availability. The UH-l's, 
the workhorse of the division, attained 
the rate of 85 percent. All of the 
availability rates exceeded the De- 
partment of the Army's standards. 

The qucntion of attainability was 
another unknown. During Air Assault 
U aircraft of the division flew 30,000 
hours and not a single operation had 
to be cancelled because of lack of air- 
craft The performance and utiliza- 
tion rates were exceptionally high 
and indicated that aircraft can be 




operated on a sustained basis. As an 
example, the Hueys, on the peak days 
required, got up to 9-10 hours in one 
day The average crew flew about ^uu 
hours during the two months of ex- 
tensive field testing. This utilization 
compares favorably with that oi 
ground vehicles. 

Another big question in many peo- 
nies' minds was that of the vulner- 
ability of the helicopter. We have 
conducted elaborate experiments at 
the Combat Development Command 
Experimentation Center. The most im- 
portant finding is that relatively slow, 
low flying aircraft are less vulnerable 
to visually sighted weapons _ than 
earlier analytic estimates and opinions 
had indicated. Statistics from Viet- 
nam offer impressive proof of the heli- 
copter's survivability. The statistics 
based on about 7fiG,000 combat sorties 
reveal that a helicopter will be hit 
bv ground fire once in every Ate 
combat sorties; it will be downed 
only once in every 6,400 combat sor- 
ties; and it will be lost to ground 
fire only once in about 13,000 sorties 
Another area investigated was that 
of interface with the Air Force. _ 

I would like to dispel the notion 
that an airmobile division reduced the 
Army's requirement for support from 
the Air Force. Both the Army and 
Air Force have logistical roles in the 
air lines of communication which are 
complementary- The air lines of com- 
munication are divided into whole- 
sale operations bulk delivery to _ the 
logistical base, and retail operations 
-tailored loads delivered to the user. 
The Army is primarily responsible 
for the retail delivery, while the AIT 
Force is responsible for the wholesale 

delivery. . 

The Air Force allocated 30 sorties 
per day for close air support during 
EL Air Assault II exercise. The need 
for extensive Air Force support of 
airmobile operations was clearly re- 
vealed. The division cannot operate 
adequately without the support of Ail- 
Force fighter bombers for close sup- 
port, reconnaissance aircraft for deep 
intelligence-gathering missions and 
transport aircraft for wholesale de- 
livery of supplies. The Air Force pro- 
vided excellent support m all of these 
categories during Air Assault II :and 
it is continuing to do so in South 
Vietnam at the present time, 

Mr. MeNamara's approval in Juno 
of the 1st Cavalry Division (Air- 
mobile) as one of our regular 16 



Mule. 



(Continued on Page 48) 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Capt. B. H. Andrews, USN 

Dir., Exploratory Development Division 

Office of Naval Material 



tion 
order 



Research, Development, Test and Evalua- 
Program amounts to something in the 
^ - "-v and one half billion dollars annually. It in- 
dozen ' Von ma j or N avy bureaus and offices, some two 

more IXj-^^Jor in-house Navy laboratories, several score 
contra^,. 3^ field facilities and activities, and thousands of 
resoiu- G v S f universities, consultants and other non-DOD 



The i 



pictecl 



gram. 

The 



^-ntegories and Organisational Responsibilities. 

Sic organization of the Navy Department is do- 
ii - ^ narl; 1- Each of the offices shown have certain 
Cities for parts of the Navy's RDT&E pro- 



c 

of the TST offlce in tllis cliain is tfl(i Assistail t Secretary 

His cha .** Vy for Research and Development ASN(R&D). 

E si y " to:L * is simple, direct and powerful : 
O f ( j, ^-klish policy, exercise management and control 
resea. ^ et ail(l supervise all Department of the Navy 
(j t " e li > development, engineering, test and evalua- 
111 El tters, including general management of the 
ipropvitxtion "Research, Developmnt, Test and Eval- 
uation, 3Xravy," 

The ASN (R&D) is the only naval civilian execu- 

tive assistant currently assigned as manager of an 

appropriation. 

Chart 2 shows the principal offices through which the 
ASN(R&D> W orks. 

A fun elemental principle which governs the Navy 
RDT&E3 business is found in the user-producer relation- 
ship as it is set forth in the Navy General Order No. 6. 
In essence, the operational forces and components of the 
Navy and the Marine Corps are the users and all other 
activities five the producers. 

It is tlie users' responsibility to state their require- 
ments anxl to select the means of satisfying these require- 
ments f i*orrL the body of alternative proposals which may 
be offered *>y tlie producers. 

It is tlie irresponsibility of the producers to formulate and 
to execute RDT&E programs which are responsive to the 



stated ne 



eds. 



The op eira " thls user-producer relationship is best 
, xem p ]i fleet through a brief analysis of the program cate- 
" . fc ined In D D numbered roram 6 



Dories 
G.I 



c0 rLfc ined In D D numbered program 6 (RDT&E) 

i 



Research. 
_ IjjjatP loratory Development. 



S.3 



A dvanced Development. 
-gjjijg'ineoring Development. 

^"K 7Vl 3 - :riagemen * ; ant ' Support. 

6.& --*ling dialogue between users and producers 
nearly zero to one hundred percent in this 
fades ^t or i from research to systems hardware develop- 
>rogreS^ & degree of explicitness with which EDT&E effort 
nent. 'V t ^^^^.ted to operational requirements varies in the 

;an be ^i oTl - 

if _^ of tlie spec t rum ijea b as i c resea rch. The 

Program seeks new knowledge which may 



iame 



At o** 






be usefully exploited toward the solutions of future prob- 
lems cither known to exist or which are so far in the 
future as to be yet unvoiced and undefined. This program 
is formulated and prosecuted under tho Chief of Naval 
Research (CNR). The relevance of tho program content 
tc the Navy's operational requirements is broadly implicit, 
and there is little direct influence exerted upon the pro- 
gram content by the user components. Naval Research ac- 
counts for approximately. 10 percent of the Navy's total 
RDT&E effort. 

Exploratory Development is a little farther along the 
chain. This program seeks to exploit research knowledge 
by the development of advanced techniques and by gen- 
erally extending- the state of the art in technologies across 
the board. Through this program is gained the techno- 
logical know-how which stimulates the conceptual design 
of highly advanced systems and components. The Navy's 
Exploratory Development Program is formulated and 
prosecuted under the Chief of Naval Development (CND). 
The bulk of the program lies in the major producer com- 
plex called the Naval Military Support Establishment 
(NMSE), consisting of the four principal material 
bureaus with their laboratories and field activities, oporal- 
ing under the Chief of Naval Material (CNM). Explora- 
tory Development accounts for 20-25 percent of the Navy's 
total RDT&E effort. 

In distinct contrast to the Navy Research ((3.1) and 
Exploratory Development (6.2) categories, the Advanced 
Development (6.3) and Engineering Development (6 A) 
programs are very specific hardware development pro- 
grams pointed towards satisfying a specifically identified 
Navy operational requirement. These two programs are 
planned, funded and managed on a lino item project basis. 
The user selects the work to be undertaken and evaluates 
the product from the standpoint of its military worth, The 
producer is charged with technical and business manage- 
ment of tho effort. The differences between categories fi.S 
and 6.4 projects He mainly in the relative degrees of tecli- 




Chart 1. 



February 1966 



nical risk, certainty as to military acceutabilitv 
Plied commitment to subsequent procuromen 
producer relationship i s obviously qu te clo^ 
programs Over 50 percent of the Navy total 
ftmdmg 1S expended in these two categories of effo 
The remaming category, Management and Support (S 5\ 



Tho Chief of Naval Department is his 



ad 



tho MnC d Commandant of 

the Marino Corps are his principal advisers with regard 
to the Advanced Development; Engineering Development 
and Operational System, Development Programs 
The Planning Process. 

The Navy RDT&E program planning process is part of 
B laifier operation called tho Navy Planning System Al- 

hough this is a formalized and intricate process, Tt has 
Carefully provided for flexibility to meet changing cim,m 
stances quickly and effectively. Long- range R&D an- 
ungMs pointed not toward freezing future systems de igns 
nto today's technologies, but rather toward advancing cur- 

ont technolog.es ,n directions that will provide the great- 
st range of options for future system design concepts, 

I here is a progressive series of documented planning 
tops winch forms a two-way and continuous communica- 
ions path hotween the users and the producers, and the 
nngunge which is used progresses from quite broad to 
cry specific as one moves along- this path from research 
o hardware development. Chart 3 depicts the general 
rocesses involved. This idealized chart does not, of course 
how the constant interplay that goes on among all the 
ivclB and which makes the whole process a highly iterative 
no, as indeed it is and must be. 

Bach of tho documents referred to on Chart 3 has a well 
anncd nature and purpose which need not be described 
ore except in a gonornl sense. 

Analysis of national objectives and national policy. DOD 
uidnncc, Joint Chiefs of Staff plans, Navy missions, etc., 
ads to a series of Navy planning documents which cover 



ASSISTANT SECRETARY 
OF THE NAVY (RSD) 




Chart 2. 
fense Industry Bulletin, 









Program Control. 

The nature and degree of program control differs 
sharply with the program category 

Both Naval Research (Category fi.l) and Exploratory 
Development (Category 6 . 2 ) are essentially fund level 
controlled programs. They represent a calculated po^ey 
decision to invest a certain portion of available RDT&E 
funds in broad scientific and technical work in order to 
develop what might he called a technological bank account 
against which the requirements of future systems con 
cepts and designs may be pursued 



thn, *< 

lhe_ Chief of Naval Development in these program cate- 
gories IB maintaining, with limited resources, a sound bal- 
ance^ of effort across the spectrum of potentially applicable 

This requires consideration of many factors, such as cur- 
rent and future operational requirements; assured capabil- 
ities and deficiencies; the relative urgencies and priori- 
ties of needs; an understanding of the sciences and tech- 
niques which are most likely to contribute solutions to ex- 
isting or future problems; and many others. In addition, 
these programs must remain flexible and must not be per- 
mitted to stagnate. The ability to pursue new ideas and 
approaches must be preserved, If new work of promise is 
to be undertaken, it can only be accommodated by termi- 
nating other work of less promise, or by moving other 
work into a different category for further exploitation, as 
appropriate. However interesting and challenging a pro- 
posal may be from a scientific point of view, it is the 

(.Continued on Page 25) 



ESI Oil OBJECTIVES 




POTEOTIAL CO 



VCEP13 STUOT 



COVCEPT set criaa STUDY 



UtVELOPMtHT TASKS 



dlK - Amend. Cjmrstlonil Penult 
TSOB - Tentative Specific dperul 
iTAS . Ptepoasil Technical Approa 
SOB - Specific Operational P^qui 
IDF - Technical reiraloptenl Plan 



Chart 3. 




DOD Directive 5126.38, "Program 
of Contractor Performance Evalua- 
tion (Development and Production}," 
Dec. ,1, 1965. Reissues DOD Directive 
5126.38, dated Oct. 5, 1964, to broaden 
its scope in the development cate- 
gories and to include certain produc- 
tion contracts which follow or are 
concurrent with the development con- 
. tracts that are evaluated, 

DOD Instruction 7700.4, "Reporting 
Requirements of the DOD Program of 
Contractor Performance Evaluation 
(Development and Production)" Dec. 
7, 1965. Reissues DOD Instruction 
7700,4, dated Aug. 8, 1963, to broaden 
its scope in the development cate- 
gories and to include certain produc- 
tion contracts that follow or are 
concurrent' with the development con- 
tracts that are evaluated. 



DOD directives and instruc- 
tions 'may be obtained from: 
Publications Distribution 

Branch 
Office of the Secretary of 

Defense 

Ttoom 3B 200, The Pentagon 
Washington, D. C. 20301 



Defense Procurement Circular 
Dec. 2,?, 1965. (1) Suspension of 
SUBPAR, (2) Small Purchase Pro- 
cedures. (3) List of 100 Contractors 
-Awarded the Largest Dollar Amount 
of Defense Prime Contracts. 

Defense Procurement Circular #38, 
Jan. 10, 1S66. (1) Labor Service Con- 
tracts. (2) DPC Notice Regarding 12- 
806.4(b). 



Each Defense Procurement 
Circular is designed to place new 
or changed policy or procedures 
in effect prior to publication of 
an Armed Services Procurement 
Regulation (ASPR) revision, 
ASPR subscribers will receive 
DPC's and ASPR revisions 
through the Superintendent of 
Documents, II. S, Government 
Printing Office, Washington, 
D.C. 20402. 



Order AD-6SQ 637 Time and Accu- 
racy as Measures of Human Per- 
formance: A Critical Review o the 
Literature, Dunlap and Associates, 
Santa Monica, Calif., for the Navy, 
Sept. 1966, 27 pp, $1. . 

Order AD-620 232 Environment 
Modification for Human Performance. 



Office of Naval Research, Washington, 
D.C., July 19G5, 18 pp, $3. 

Order AD-62,1 157 Accuracy of 
Source Data, Human Error in Hand 
Transcription. PMC Corp. for the Air 
Force. $6. 

Order AD-88A 044 Cold Stress: 
Parameters, Kffects, Mitigation. Texas 
Christian University's Institute of Be- 
havioral Research for the Air Force, 
Sept. 1965, 19 pp, $2. 

Order AD-621 B! t fi Nonlinear Semi- 
conductors at Millimeter Frequencies, 
General Telephone & Electronics 
Laboratories, Bayside, N.Y., for the 
Army, Aug. 1965, 144 pp, $4. 

Order AD-619 / { 59 Noise Optimiza- 
tion of Field-Effect Transistors. Navy 
Underwater Ordnance Department, 
China Lake, Calif., June 1965, 47 pp, 
$2. 

Order AD-G21 152 A System for 
Loiv-Tempcmture Measurements of 
Thermal Conductivity. Measurements 
of Silicon from 77 to 300K. South 
Dakota School of Mines, Rapid City, 
S.D., for the Navy, Oct. 19G6, 44 pp, 
$2. 

Order AD-OSS 091 Computer- Aided 
Information Systems for Gaming. Re- 
search Analysis Corp., McLean, Va., 
for the Army, Sept. 1964, 43 pp, $2. 

Order AD 623 796 Experimental 
On-Line Data Storage and Retrieval 
System, MIT's Lincoln Laboratory, 
Cambridge, Mass., for the Air Force, 
Sept. 1965, 42 pp, $2. 

Order AD-623 801 Part 7, General 
Instability of Ortltotrapioally Stiff- 
ened Cylinders (Axial Compression, 
Torsion and Hydrostatic Pressure 
Loadings), Allied Research Associ- 
ates, Inc., for the Air Force, July 
1986, 117 pp, $4. 

Order AD-62S 810 Port II, General 

Instability of Orthotropically Stiff- 
ened Cylinders (Bending and Com- 
bined Compression and Bending). 
Allied Research Associates Inc., for 
the Air Force, Aug. 1965, 51 pp, $3, 

Order AD-612 912 Electron Frac- 
tography Handbook, Douglas Air- 
craft, Santa Monica, Calif., for the 
Air Force, Jan, 1965, 910 pp, $12.10. 

Order AD-623 567 Electron Micro- 
scope Fracture Examination to Char- 
acterize and Identify Modes of Frac- 
ture. Naval Research Laboratory, 
Washington, D.C., Sept. 1965, 124 pp, 
$4. 

Order AD-623 952 Feasibility Study 
of On-Site Fabricated Beach Matting, 



Boeing's Support Systems Div. for the 
Marine Corps., Sept. 1965, 78 pp, ?3. 

Order AD-622 780 Photoclastio De- 
termination of Strain Distribution in 
Cement Paste, Mortars and Concrete. 
Naval Engineering Laboratory, Port 
Hueneme, Calif., Nov. 1965, 37 pp, $2. 

Order AD-023 SOS Fineries (Fluid 
Amplification) . # 0. Fluid Digital 
Logic Elements and. Circuits, Army's 
Harry Diamond Laboratories, Wash- 
ington, D.C., Aug. 1965, 47 pp, $2, 

Order AD-623 Oil Fluid Amplifica- 
tion. #17. Studios of Reattar.hinft Jet 
Flown in Fluid-State Wall- Attach- 
ment Devices. United Aircraft, East 
Hartford, Conn., for the Army, Sept, 
1965, 10G pp, $4. 

Order AD-618 940 A Study of Ef- 
fective Fender Systems for Navy 
Piers and Wharves. Naval Civil Engi- 
neering Laboratory, Port Hueneme, 
Calif., March 1965, 114 pp, $2.50. 

Order AD-624 Deformation Charac- 
teristics of Metals and Alloys. Syra- 
cuse University Research Institute 
for the Navy, Sept. 1965, 103 pp, $4. 

Order AD-fi24 029 Laser-Induced 
Non-linear Optical Effects. Aerospace 
Technology Division of Library of 
Congress, Washington, D.C. for the 
Air Force, Oct. 1966, 52 pp, $3. 

Order AD-623 484 Fundamental in- 
vestigation of Molybdenum Disnlfide 
as a Solid Lubricant. Southwest Re- 
search Institute, Houston, Tex., for 
the Navy, Aug. 1965, 69 pp, $3. 

Order AD-C22 710 Biochemical Fuel 
Cell Molpar, Falls Church, Va., for 
the Army, June 1965, 113 pp, $4. 

AD-622 267 Modular Design of Im- 
proved Solar Converters. Hamilton 
Standard Div. of United Aircraft for 
the Army, March 1965, 102 pp, $4. 

Order AD-624 313 Investigation o] 
Germanium Diodes for Thermo- 
Photovoltaic Energy Converters, MIT, 
Cambridge, Mass., for the Army, Sept. 
1965, 82 pp, $3. 



Government research and de- 
velopment reports are available 
to science and industry at price 
indicated from: 

Clearinghouse for Federal and 

Scientific Information 
Department of Commerce 
Springfield, Va. 22151 
Authorized DOD contractors 
and grantees may obtain these 
documents without charge from: 
Defense Documentation Center 
Cameron Station 
Alexandria, Va. 22314 



24 



February 1966 



The Planning and Management 
of the Navy RDTSE Program 

(Continued from Payc 23) 

potential applicability of the work to 
some Navy need that normally must 
prevail. 

A continuing and careful program 
appraisal effort is obviously required 
to keep both of these programs healthy 
and most effectively responsive. 

The control exercised over the hard- 
ware programs in the Advanced De- 
velopment (Category 6.3) and Engi- 
neering Development (Category 6.4) 
is quite different. 

Each year, the. users (the Chief of 
Naval Operations and the Command- 
ant of the Marine Corps) arc offered 
many new ideas and concepts for sys- 
tems which could bo of operational 
value. Each of these Is carefully stud- 
ied with consideration as to priority, 
urgency, technical risk involved, po- 
tential military worth, implied costs 
and other commitments, and the like. 
The users then select the work to be 
undertaken within the funds which 
are expected to be available. 

Each project thus selected be- 
comes a separately budgeted and pro- 
grammed line item. 

Each of these projects is subject to 
continuous and detailed review of 
technical progress, cost, adherence to 
schedule, etc., and a monthly perform- 
ance evaluation (MPE) report is sub- 
mitted by the cognizant bureau to 
keep the user and the ASN(R&D) 
informed as to status and problems. 
Program Execution. 

The management which is given to 
RDT&E effort depends largely upon 
the nature, the magnitude and the 
relative importance to the Navy of the 
work involved. 

.Each of the in-house laboratories is 
provided with a reasonable amount of 
"foundational" money. These are 
funds from the Research (6.1) and 
the Exploratory Development (6.2) 
categories which are made available 
to the laboratory directors for work 
of their own selection. There is little 
or no direct management of these 
funds above the laboratory level ex- 
cept for post facto review of the qual- 
ity and the results of the effort, and 
a minimal degree of guidance to avoid 
undesirable overlapping of work 
among the laboratories. 

The remainder of the Naval Re- 
search (6.1) effort is prosecuted 
through the Office of Naval Research 



under the broad program guidance, 
supervision and fiscal control of the 
scientific offices of that organization. 
Much of this category of effort is con- 
ducted by universities and private in- 
dustrial research organizations. 

The remainder of the Exploratory 
Development (6.2) program is prose- 
cuted through the several bureaus 
and offices under the coordination and 
control of the Chief of Naval Devel- 
opment. Most of this effort is prose- 
cuted through the two major mate- 
rial bureaus (Bureau of Naval Weap- 
ons and Bureau of Ships) and the 
several established project offices of 
the NMSE, and is coordinated and 
directed by the Deputy Chief of 
Naval Material (Development) who 
exercises both program and fiscal con- 
trol. Exploratory Development work 
is about evenly split between the in- 
house laboratories and industry. 

Essentially all of the Systems De- 
velopment effort (Categories 6.3 and 
6.4) is prosecuted through the mate- 
rial bureaus of the NMSE and the va- 
rious project offices under the broad 
policy control and technical super- 
vision of the Chief of Naval Material. 
While a substantial systems develop- 
ment effort is prosecuted by the in- 
house Navy laboratories, the majority 
of such work is carried out through 
contracts to industrial organizations 
throughout the country. 

This article could only hope to give 
a very simplified view of what is a 
most complex operation. 

For those who would care to know 
more, complete information on this 
subject is contained in a two-volume 
series entitled "Department of the 
Navy RDT&E Management Guide 
(NAVSOP-2457),'' available from 
the Superintendent of Documents, 
Government Printing Office, Wash- 
ington, D. C. 20402. The price is 60(f 
for Volume I and $1.50 for Volume II, 



Mobilization Designee 

Assignments Open 

In Army R&D 

The Army Office of Research and 
Development is seeking applications to 
nil 86 mobilization design ce assign- 
ment vacancies for grades rangEng 
from major to colonel. 

Active reserve officers will be con- 
sidered on a selective basis in duty 
MOS 2167, Research and Develop- 
ment coordinator, and in MOS 2280 
Psychologists. ' 

The greatest demand is in the fields 
of^ _ nuclear physics, international 
affairs, life sciences, engineering, 
space physics, operations research, 
metallurgy, mathematics, chemistry, 
psychology, environ mental sciences, 
budgeting and plans and program- 
ming. Credit is given for both 'mili- 
tary Eirul civilian experience. 

Mobilization designees have their 
training carefully monitored by the 
Office of the Chief of Research and 
Development (OCRD) to insure con- 
tinuing career development. Duty may 
bo within OCRD in the Pentagon, 
with R&D laboratories or by attend- 
ance or participation in Army R&D 
fiominm-s. Arrangements for special 
R&D projects to earn retirement 
points may bo made by those accepted 
officers who have scheduling dim- 
cult ies. 

Applications should be matlo on De- 
partnwmt of the Army Form 297C 
(Army Regulations 140-10 and 140- 
146) addressed to: Commanding Offi- 
cer, U.S. Army Reserve Components 
Person nel Center, Fort Ben j nmin 
Harrison, Ind., through the appro- 
priate U.S. Army Corps commander. 

For those desiring assignment to 
the Qlllcc of the Chief of Research 
and Development, further information 
may bo obtained by writing to the 
Office, Chief of Research and De- 
velopment, Department of the Army, 
ATTN: Military Personnel Branch. 
Washington, B.C. 20310. 



DEFENSE PRIME CONTRACT AWARDS 
TO SMALL BUSINESS 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

July-Nov. 1965 July-Nov. 1964 

Procurement from All Firms 12 , 4B4 , 661 W(GB2 

Procurement from Small Business Firms 2,622,872 2,068883 

Percent Small Business 2 i.l 20 7 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



25 




Architects and engineers exert the 
greatest single influence in the suc- 
cess of the Office of Civil Defense 
(OCD) Fallout Shelter Development. 
Program. All buildings have shielded 
areas affording some degree of protec- 
tion. This basic protection can be im- 
proved in future building construction 
without appreciably increasing the 
cost or adversely affecting the- esthe- 
tics and function for normal use. 
Special knowledge is required to in- 
crease the lifesaving potential in new 
buildings knowledge of the nature of 
radioactive fallout and how to design 
structure to provide shielding against 
it, 

Because of its vital lifesaving po- 
tential, the development of a nation- 
wide fallout shelter system is the core 
of civil defense planning-. The aim is 
to achieve fallout shielding for all 
Americans through a network of dual- 
use public shelter space and by en- 
couragement of private shelter devel- 
opment. 

The vigorous construction program 
of the past few years and the contin- 
ued expansion of this program 
throughout the United States offers 
an opportunity for a significant in- 
crease in America's fallout shelter 
inventory. The OCD Professional 
Development Program is designed to 
encourage such planning. 

Architectural and engineering col- 
leges and universities are playing an 
expanded role in disseminating the 
new technology of radiation shielding 
analysis and other related subjects to 
the design professions. Through this 
moans, practicing professionals, as 
well as new graduates, can keep 
abreast of current developments. 

With the cooperation of architec- 
tural and engineering educational in- 
stitutions and their faculty members, 
a unique professional development 
program for practicing architects and 
engineers was initiated in 1961. 

Fallout Shelter Analysis Courses 
are offered as intensive two-week ses- 
sions, on a semester typo basis (one 
night a week for 15 weeks) or as a 
correspondence course. The courses 
acquaint architects and engineers with 
nuclear weapon effects and shielding 
methodology and design techniques. 



Architects and engineers who success- 
fully complete the course are certi- 
fied as Fallout Shelter Analysts and 
are periodically apprised of the latest 
developments including research re- 
ports. 

Protective Construction Courses on 
a two-week or semester type basis 
are also offered. These courses are 
primarily concerned with structural 
dynamics and response of structures 
to the immediate effects of a nuch^ir 
detonation. 

In addition, Environmental En- 
gineering Courses are offered to ac- 
quaint the mechanical engineer with 
the unique problems associated with 
shelter environment control and the 
procedures for solving these problems. 
Other courses such as Disaster En- 
gineering and Shelter Planning arc 
now being developed for future pres- 
entation. 

The immediate objective of this pro- 
fessional development program is to 
survey and locate potential public fall- 
out shelter space in existing struc- 
tures a type of post-design analysis. 
But the program also provides the 
orientation that architects and en- 
gineers must have if fallout protec- 
tion is to be considered at the critical 
point in the creation of a building- 
the design stage. 



"Canine Corps" Seeks 
Recruits for Vietnam 

Air Force sentry dog teams have 
performed so effectively in protecting 
American lives and preventing sabo- 
tage in South Vietnam that the quota 
has been doubled for canine recruits. 

The 1,000-dog quota set in Septem- 
ber has been raised to 2,000 to meet 
tho increasing demand for sentry dog 
teams. 

To qualify for duty in Vietnam, the 
dogs must be German shepherds only, 
male or spayed female, 12-36 months 
old, at least 23 inches high at the 
shoulder and weigh at least 60 
pounds. 

Anyone wishing to donate or sell 
German shepherd dogs is urged to 
write the USAF Animal Procurement 
Office, Lackland AFB, Tex. 78236, 



Medical Research Labs 
Combine at WPAFB 

The Aerospace Medical Research 
Laboratories, Wright-Patterson AFB, 
Ohio, have merged their biophysics and 
biomeclical laboratories. The new unit 
is called the Biophysics Laboratory. 

The organizational switch was 
prompted, in part, by increasing em- 
phasis on toxic hazards research and 
the resulting additions of tasks and 
employees. Toxicology work has been 
elevated to division status. 

Realignment of the Aerospace Medi- 
cal Research Laboratories reduces the 
number of laboratory units to two 
the Biophysics Laboratory and tho 
Behavior Science Laboratory, which 
remains unchanged. 

During the past two years, space 
nutrition research has been diminish- 
ing at the Laboratories but the effort 
is being continued by the Aovospiicc 
Medical Division's School of Aero- 
space Medicine, Brooks AFB, Tex. 

Other changes include establish- 
ment of a Life Support Division to 
bring together all related engineering 
and biological research. 

No reduction in force was necessary 
in the change, and the Laboratories 
strength remains at JJBfi (227 civilians 
and 129 military personnel). 



NORAD Excess 

ADP Equipment 

To Be Redistributed 

An estimated $(55 million worth of 
automatic data processing equipment 
left over after tho reorganisation of 
tho North American Air Defense Com- 
mand is slated for redistribution by 
the Department of Defense at no cost 
other than crating and shipping. 

The excess equipment resulted from 
the phase out of certain somi-uuto- 
matic ground environment (SAGE] 
facilities and will be made available 
to other DOD and Federal agencies- 
Authorized donees will also be in- 
cluded in the redistribution of the 
equipment. Eligibility of authorized 
donees is determined by State 'agencies 
for surplus property and is contingent 
on support of education, public health 
or civil defense programs. 

On-site operational inspections of 
the equipment will be held at Truax 
AFB, Wis., March 1, 2 and 3 and at 
Norton AFB, Calif,, March 8, 9 and 
10. 

A catalog describing the equipment 
can be obtained from the Defense Sup- 
ply Agency, Attention: DSAH-LSR. 
Cameron Station, Alexandria, Va 
22314. 



26 



February 196< 



Department of Defense 
FINANCIAL SUMMARY 

(BILLIONS OP DOLLARS) 



FY 1962 




FY 18 CG 




Original Final 

- 

Strategic Offensive Forces _...._ 7>B g g ^ 
Continental Air and Missile 90 O 'n /' 

r\ p *-, &tt ,.$ I U 

Defense Forces. 
General Purpose Forces ___ ._.. 14 fi 1? r, 1?r 
Airlift/Sealift Forces . ', j' 2 " '3 


B l " Y 13r "' B Rnncte(( 

& A nth, ' 

"^ -~*- -^ ^ 

7.3 5.3 4.6 
2.0 1.6 1.7 

17.7 10.0 21.2 
1.2 1.5 1.7 
1.9 2.1 2.1 
5.4 4.9 5.2 
13.8 14.5 lfi.0 
1.2 1.4 1.0 
1.2 1.3 1.0 


SEA 
1 Suppl. Total 

.5 fi.l 

1.7 

8.8 30.0 
.5 2.2 
.1 2.2 
.1 5.3 
1.8 16.8 
1.6 
1.6 


I''Y IB 

5.1 
1.4 

25.7 
2.1 
2.4 
' B.B 
16.7 
1.8 
1,0 


Reserve and Guard Forces _..._ L7 u ' g 1 ' g 
Research and Development . 39 4 *g ^ 
General Support _.^ ^ ^ ^'g 
Retired Pay () 


Military Assistance -, H , 
1<0 Ia j_ () 


lolal Obhgational Authority ... . 46.1 44.9 50.7 61.5 
Loss: Financing- Adjustments _ 3.0 --1.3 -1.3 _ 4 


51.7 51.4 54.6 
-.8 -.9 -3.6 


11.1) 66.5 
+ .4 -3.2 


01.4 
-1.6 


New Obhgational Authority .._ 43,1 43.7 49.4 51.1 
Adjustment to Expenditures __ +1.6 +1.0 -1.2 _i l 


50.9 50.5 61.0 
-KB -3.1 -.7 


12.3 63.3 
-8.4 -9.1 


69.9 
-1.6 


local expenditures 44.7 44.7 48.2 50.0 

' " "" "**" 

TOA by Department and Aeencv 


51,2 47.4 50.3 

- 

12.5 12.2 13.2 
14.7 15.0 16.3 
20.2 19.G 19.7 
-1 -1 .1 
1-1 1.1 1.3 
1.2 1.4 1.6 
.7 .6 .7 
1.2 1,8 1.6 


3.9 54.2 



4.8 18,0 

3.2 19.4 
3.7 23.4 
,1 

.2 1,6 

1.0 

.7 

1.0 


58,3 

17.4 
17.6 
21.5 
.1 

1.5 
"1.8 
.5 
1,0 


Department of the Army ^ _ 104 104 19 n 11 o 


Department of the Navy _ 127 194 147 i^ 


Department of the Air Force 19.9 13.5 19>7 2Q g 
Civil Defense 


.0 .1 

Defense Agencies 8 a q 


- . .1 .d 1.0 
Retired Pay _ _ 8 ,. 


T-, . - . .U .9 1,0 

Defense Family Housing 5 K c 


Military Assistance IK i D , 




lotai IUA 46>1 44>(J 50i? 5L5 

=::=:= ^ ===:: ==^= ::: ==^^= = i = 
MEMO: Increases since FY 1961 in 
in rates of compensation included 
above : 

Increased Compensation Rate: 
Military 


61.7 51.4 64.6 

, = 

1-1 1.6 2,4 
-3 .6 .7 
4 .6 .8 

1.8 2.8 3.9 

~~ ~ __ 

66.1 58.3 C6.5 


11.0 66.5 

. . ~ ""- 
i... . 

2.4 
,7 


61,4 

2.G 
.8 
1.0 


Civilian 


. ^_ _ p 

Increased Payments to Retired _ .1 l 


Total _ 1 




-. 3.9 

- 

66.5 


4.3 

69.2 


J- .1 .5 

~ ' 
Unfunded military retirement past 45.1 47 Q iHO 
service liability. " J 



compemntion. 

" At current pay rates. It would require $2.1 billion 



* n r,,a 



27 



























7 






31 


O O O 

to ^ 10 

IO CO t- 


OOO OOlOOT 
lOOOt- OCMrfOr- 
rH Oi O> Tp rH lO rH r- 


1 

\ 



IO IO 
rH rH 


O 

o 

TO 


co in 01 co o 

rH IO O CO O 
IO (1 CO to rH 


o 

IO 

i-H 


O 
IO 

""t 


o 
o 


S : 

o '. 

g 






fH 


IO rH 


00 T]I IO to rH 




-" rH 


CO" 


to" t-~ Oi" TO 


t-" 


rH" 


co" 


-H 






ft 


H 


i-H rH rH 




O 


lO 


rH rH rH 


1O 




in 


N 




rn 






















w" t 




C 





























to 
to 
tn 


OOO 
IO t- CO 


OOO OOOOif 
O (O CO L- rf IO O C 


* 

4 


O IO 


O 
O 


^ i-H CO ^t 1 O 
CM CO CO t- O 


IO 


IO 
t- 


o 

o 


g 




c 


r-1 


CM t- IO 


CO rH 00 CO iH (O rH 




Ol N_ 


CM_ 


O ^ t IO rH 


Ol_ 


CM 


c^_ 


o < 






!* 


TjT rH 


to" "* Co" CO rH 




C-f H 


Tf 


^ lo" Oi" TO 


CM 


rH 


^ 


c 




K 


ft 


rH 


H rH rH 




O 


IO 


rH rH rH 


IO 




IO 






H 






















41 






in 
to 


CM tO ** 

CD oj oo 


i-HovC) eot-a>coi- 


-1 

f 


CO Ol 
t- CM 


rH 
O 


O Ol CO IO TO 
O Ol rH CO OJ 


CO 
t- 


Ol 
C-l 


rH 
O 


1 






H 


CO C- CO 


t- TO 00 (M O tO t- 




rH C 1 ^ 


^ 


CO CO (M CO 


*"! 


CM K 


^i. 


C! 






1* 


C-l rH 


et" CM rH tO rH 




tO rH 


t- 


rH TO 00 CM 


to 


rH 


t- 


*" 






ft 


rH 


H i-H rH 




"* 


M' 


rH rH rH 


^ 




"* 


& 


0) 
























ft 


3 




I- 

31 


to o o 

rH 00 00 


(O O ^ TO t- ^ IO 
t- O t Oi M CO =!" 




C- 

O H 


L- 

rH 


CO IO * C-l IO 
rH tO O t- TJI 


o 
o 


t- 

i-H 


L 
rH 


fc 


. 




H 


00 t- 


to t- -!j< 00 CO to rH 






W - 


t-^ t-; CM, 0, rH 


01^ 


Ol 


M 


s 


TJ 

C 
0) 


c 
o 


ft 


tO H 
rH 


CO 10" Co" CO rH 
rH TH TH 




I-H" 
to 


CM" 


rH rH CM 


to 




CD 


1 


a 


'8 






















o 


X 
Ul 




IB 

31 


MOO 
IO tD O 


rH i-H O? rH Tf *d< CO 
rH rH O rH CM CM rH 




CO CO 
t- 


rH 

co 


CO CO CO O) CO 
IO CO "* i-H rH 


CO 

o 


rH 
CO 


CO 


o 


,__ 


o 




IO M tO 


O Oi to O OJ CO rH 




C-]^ ^ 


to 


MI t~ rH C-^ TH 


C-l 


^i. 


to, 


o 


c 

D 


(J 


S 


rH 


t- ^ O b 1 * H 
rH t- C-l 




C-l" H" 
<> 


co" 

to 


t-" 00 N CO" 
rH rH C-i 


CM" 

CO 


rH 


TO 
CD 


o 
o 


u 

C 





IO 


CO (M tO 
O) CO CO 


tO CO TO t- H (M IO 
rH to CO 00 IO to OV 




C- t- 
IO to 


C-l 


CM C-] L- i-H IO 

C- CM O to Ol 


L- 
IO 


t- 

to 


5i 


t- 


. 




01 


to t- co 


00 IO ^ CO O fO 




O T-H^ 




rH tD O rH 


O 


i-H 


CM 


" 


* 

Q 




. 


CM" rH 


M 1 C-f CO" CO rH 




oT I-H 


o 


C-l M 1 Ol OS 


oi 


i-H 


O 


t. 






ft 


rH 


rH rH rH 




* 


IO 


rH rH rH 


<* 




IO 


a 
a 


























a 


JQ 


























O 





t- 

to 


tO O O 
rH CO 00 


to o oo 10 co c-i co 

C- O O O OS (M CO 


1 
1 


00 t- 

co r:J 


IO 


tO C-l CM M 1 CO 
rH IO M 1 O) CO 


CO 

CO 


L- 
i-H 


IO 
IO 


3 




T 


2 


O^CO t> 


to t- M* Oi IO IO rH 




OJ Oi 


00 


rH O) O) t- rH 


O3 


Ol 


CO 


o 




o 




to" rH 


co" 10" to" to 




co" 


Oi" 


i.-" to" o" co" 


cc 




Ol" 


a 


9) y _ > 





ft 


rH 


rH rH rH 




IO 


IO 


rH rH CM 


IO 




IO 


w 


4) Q >O PH 


<! 






















1 


S "" I-H 1 

tU 4 1 T 


"3 
c 
.2 


10 

IB 
CT) 
r-1 


CM 
N CO O 
10 00 to 


rH rH rH rH O tO t- 
CO rH CO O) O (0 O 
Oi O) 00 t- IO CO rH 




CO O 
CO t- 

%. "^ 


CO 

o 

co 


in co L to t- 

t- CO t- Oi 
O TO qi L rH 


CO 
TO 
00 


o 
t- 


CO 

o 
TO 





* 10 n 


i 


F" 


^ rH 
rH 


(O -qi O) to CM 
rH rH i-H 




rH rH 

to 


co" 

CO 


t- 00 CM 07 
rH rH C-l 


rH 

co 


rH 


TO 
CO 




ll P 


,n 


ft 
















































c3 o 


<W 




in 


to TH o> 


tO TO CO TO O) rH IO 




TO O 


TO 


TO in oi CM 10 


TO 


O 


CO 


g 


m O 





to 

31 


Cp IO Oi 


IO o OO CO ^ TO O 




to co 


CT) 


O "tf H O> O 


to 


TO 


Ol 


o 


[H ,,-, fc. 


4> 


H 


IO t- CO 


tO tD CO *$ O tD TH 




TO rH 




O CO CM r-j^ rH 


TO 


rH 


T] 


PI 


2 jj W 




trt 


C-l rH 


*" C-l" 03 to" rH 




OS i-T 


o" 


CM" -rf" oT co" 


oi 


rH 


o" 


=. (fl 


" C L. f^i 




C 


rH 


rH rH rH 




^l 1 


IO 


rH rH rH 


tfi 




IO 


rH ,^ 


IH O ^** O 
























w m 


g- "6*5 |3 




IS 
Ol 


to O O 
rH 00 00 


tO O "^ ^ <M t- T)< 
J> O TO rH rH CM CO 




L- t- 


CM 


CO Oi 00 OJ Tjl 
t- C- O> O CO 


t- 

Oi 


t- 
CM 


s 


S >! 


Q .S 1 w P 


rf 




o oo t-^ 


CO, I> CO O5 tO IO rH 




CO O 


"* 


TO IO -y 00^ rH 


f. 


O 


<- 


1-1 ft 


!5! UL S 


O 


L! 


tO" r-T 


M IQ" t-' to 




O H 


H" 


t>" t-" rH CO" 


o 


rH 


rH 


.* 


O 


H 





rH 


rH TH rH 




to 


to 


i-H rH CM 


to 




to 


CO O 
H O 


























a o 







IB 

to 


CM O O 
IO to O 


rH TH tO tO CO ** S- 
TH rH t- M 1 (M Ol O 




Tf r-i 
t- Oi 


IO 

co 


MI CO Ol to t- 
CO CM "^J 1 LO O 


tr- 


rH 
Ol 


IO 
(O 


S OT 




S 


" 


10 CO to 


O Oi tO O> LO tO i-H 




00^ IO 


^f 


O -* M 1 OO rH 


et 


IO 


^ 


p 0) 


s 


I 


t" 


rH 


H rH CM 




Tt* r- 

to 


s 


oo" 01" TO" co" 

rH rH CM 


t 


T-T 


to 

CO 


P Vl 


5" 


M 






















S"" So 


o 


S 


1ft 

to 
O) 


00 CM tO 
Ol CO CO 


10 TO CO t- CO O (M 
^ tO CM ^1 CO IO O 




o> to 
to c-i 


Oi 


^J* CM t- IO CM 
CO CO O ^ O 


cs 
to 


to 


"# 

Ol 


31 
S hM 


* 


IH 


r-1 


tD t- CO 


CO in -^ IO O) to rH 




O K 




CM OS tO rH rH 


O 


TO 


TO 


h 




H 


t| 


CM TH 


^' (N ^ tu 




O T- 


r-i 


Cvf Tjl" CrT CO 


o 


rH 


rH 


. R 


c 

JO 




ft 


rH 


TH rH TH 




lO 


IO 


rH rH iH 


IT 




in 


<H B 

. . TJ 


a! 
















1 








^ 9 
s ^ 


"S 
























g g 


D) 
























H +1 
ft 'ft 


n 

D 














d 










a 8 


ea 






d 




ta 




rS 








rH. 
tH 


3 t* 








t? 


I^J 


'TJ 


If. 




^ 






r^ 


O H 


G 






' 





S 


a 


rQ 


O 


I 




-n 


I ^ 


o 






CJ 




- 


irH 


g 


Srtj 


_c 






s 


i. 






u 










O 








St> 


Q 






JH 

'B 

W 


a) vi 
o o 

^ 


H-J 
0) 




U 



rH 


_o 


W h 
<J 

. fe 


c 
1= 
P 

L. 




% 

o 


p 

T3 

S 

d iB 








5 


K Jj" 

*^ c ri 
'b <u o 


P 




O 


"in Jfl ^ *^) W 


H- 



1 


1 


< t 

fi 








rt K] 


s a '-o 


p 


J5 * 


ft, p 


3> m . O 





O 


&] H> 


K 1 








.0 ! <3 ' 


J P- B 





S E 


. 


13 0) 1J i, ^v^ 


t 

* 


i 


1 


<& t r 
u> I h 


























^ 9 








y . C C fii (3 


, Q rn fl 


f 


^ r7 


??f 'E3 


(3 IM HH "tf 


* 


ul 


tj 4-> 










3 t-i ^ -, 
: aJ *-f 
&j <U ?: T3 

hi Bl 


jjuiyi 


b 


ll 


--3 


P, O O H ^ 

s jufi 


1 


, <a 

& 


ii 


* 8 J 

fr< ,a js 

e & "3 

S fi B 








J -^ M M 


g 3 OJ g' j3 W ^ 


^ 







rf S rf S r-H 




1 




POM 
A '3 n 








3 


p. M S S 1 ^ 


5 


!^ 




& & & *S 'S 








? 










Of Hr^O 


W 


J? 




ft fl P ft 6 




fe 




3 



February 1966 




Defense Industry 





It- 1 

* co o t 

pi 10 tO r 
1 00 rH t- t 


H N L- in i 

M * O, 


2 t~ 5 
2 p o-i 01 


(M rH Ol rH C 
CO CO O < 
H (N 0^ 

rH rH rH 


) O CO CO rH C 

^ co co w 
o" 


O CO <D OO 00 - 

MI -rf Ol O rH tC 

r^ co co co c 

-^ r- 


o in ira o c 

(M CM 00 >tf l- 

7 co" to" if 

I 


-!! 

B w* 




H CM" co" t 




H rH 








01 




\M 








]U in 




f[ 
ill .-._.,., ,-1. _i 


O i < (^ "^t 1 T- 


H O O IO IO C 


, " ** 
5 Q 3 




.= <S 01 rH C 

g 2 S o o < 


3 CO ^f O 
D H "f J-J 


MO pi O; 

r- IO t- rH Ct 


tO O CO (M 

H CD CO 


-- P7"l ^T IT- ^' 

,-1 tH Ol CO 
rH CO IN CO 


O CO 00 rH <M 
O I'M CO ^ c 

TH" r 


7 1- CM IO CO C 

H" >M" in" <o" P 


j ir/i P 

>- K 
: on 




u CM CO 01 


^D rH 1" P^I^ 


^ ^ 


rH 


!*! 






r 


H 




sfc '*"" 


O" rH 


rH TH 






1 




H 

lira 

l^ to 01 m 

2- rtl CO rH 
II CO t- H 


T]| H O 
O IO W Ol 


to co co co ti 

g rH OJ CO C 


-, O OV CO rH 
i I to CO 
[ T|I CO M 


CO t- O Ol rH 

t- 1- CO (M fH 
O (M (M CO 

rH 


t- 

01 

CO 


Ol CO CO rH 
rH I- CO 
IM IN rH 


O -fji CO T-H Ol C 
>] to CO O M" C 
i l.-^ Ol, rH^ C 

T-H ~f 10 


5 




te - 


O r"* 


IM -H 




1 




- ill 


^ -*f IO *H 
L- 03 ff> rH 
(M CO M M, 


0, L- H ** 1 

mo lf5 ' 

O) Ol, CO r 


o IS "" 

rH rH rH 


(O rH (M CO I.- 

o o co i- 01 

to eo 't w 

ff 


co 
o 


IO O O CO 

Cl -if O iM 


CO (O i-H IO C-l 
Q rH rH Ol IO 

co to in IM, 

rH' Co" to" CO 


- 


rH 




SM rH" * 


L-" H 


rH H 






1 




.IN 






1 




3l 
cj| 

Bite 


CO 01 L- 
Ol IN rH O 


to o 01 ^ 

^ L- t^ rH 
O) t- CO 


n (M H* 00 IM 
VI Ol 00 <71 
^ CO^ I0_ <M K 


tO L- IO Ol rH 
t- id' O) Ol TH 

t- tji -rt> co 


rH 

o 


rH to ira 01 

-^i 1- CO 


rH CO rH (M CM 
00 (M tji Ol ^ 

rH -tf" t-" t- 





o 




l"l 1 r. t " 


L^- co T(< (M 




r-T rH rH 


*!' 








f-l 




>*| rH M "* 


co" -- 1 


rH rH 






1 




,Sn 






1 




I-H Tf Ol IO, 


H oi ^* Ol 
Ol O rH m 
(M 10 W 


IO IO rH CO 
1-0 
O Ol^ (M 


* '1 S H 

r^-\ f>l O t * > 

^ i- 10 HI 


O] C> Ol IO CO 
CO O -^l 1 i-H 
to CO CO -W 

rH 


(M 

t- 
o 

rH 


CJ tO rH 00 
tO CO 't rH 

rH CO rH 


xH C^l Ol IO I. 
O O CO tO CM 

L-- o in co 

IM l O l O 


CO 

22 




'JH rH~ CO" 


in" H 


C^l rH 






1 




IM 




1 


to 


'S 


Us 

olS 


M Ol rH 
O) <N tO 
IO "*, W 


to to 10 o 
L-- ira co Oi 

01 CO CO H 


H H Cl ** 
CO 10 10 

01 i?- co 


M 00 tH Ol rH 

to ^f C-^ to 

H" tH 1 rH 


co co 01 <$ cc 

,_l tD tD rH T" 
I7-) M CO <M 


Ol 

t- 


00 O Ol Ol 
DO -^l CO M 
CM 1 *li 


CD rH IM CO rH 
CO rH 1:- L- in 
Ol W L-^ IN, 

,4 co" 10" t-" 


00 

* 



rH 


o 


Lcl 


H co' 


10 " 


rH rH 






1 


fi *o5 

t*, P 


3 lU 
Is 


H rH H 
rH Ol <C 
CO L-_O 


g qlS5 

CO CO ^ K 


CO O 01 CO 

O O) O3 rH 

to^ 10^ 01 


<o rjl O O O 

5 to o i- 

pj IO IO CO_ 
rH rH' H" 


m CO Q 01 
# CO ^ "* 


' 

rH 
rH 


C-l I- C-l Ol 

CO IO rH 


.-( -*f 10 t- IO 
rH L- 00 O rH 


H 


O 

H 


>~l >O 


d 
^ ly^ 


H C-l" ir 


Oi" 


rH r-1 








1 


SsSigp 

a LU o ^ * 


H 00 V 
IO CO C- 

Tjl 00 


J M tf tO 
tO CO (D r 

; 01, IM to t 


^, 10 10 CO 00 
H H 

- ID m CM 


_, CO W 10 r 
_( tO CO W 
C\) IO IO W 


J rH 00 1- O> l 
^ S3 L- 01 rH r 

TH 


D 01 
-1 CO 

rH 


HI rH H O 
IO IO IM -t 
rH CO rH 


CM CO OO CO (M 
t- CO L- H tO 
tO I 1 - t^, Ol, 

r-f 10 to 


M 
H 


o> *. 


/I tH 


rH P 


3 IO r 


H" M" H 










1 


S&l | h 

S pLi 


(M (M 1 
01 rH I 

IO <0 C 


^ o to 10 c 

j (P 10 CO 

o in co co 


3 H rH Ol M 1 

3 So 


co oo o in 

(n 'T' L ^r 
en tO CO l ft 


-< Th CO L- IO 
tO Ol rH (M 


CO 
V) to 

Ol 


(M -HI CO i 
rH to IO C- 

co m TF 


CO rH IM I- If 

to to 01 CM r 

rH M" <0 t-" 


M 1 1 

s 


1 1 


i gr 


rH ' 


t <o" 


-T rH w 






1 


s 

4J 


^4 

fcr 


CO *!* 
CO Ol 
CO Ol 


n OT i3) Tf 
JV in <ON 

ra H, M ^f 


o to o to pj- 

tji CO CO L~ r- 
lM O Ol, CO 


Oi T-H CO 10 
C-f H rH 


f,] O O 1/J 


L- 

rH L- 

rH 


t- 00 ^ tl 
00 CO W T 


3 ,ri 10 oo in i- 
i oo * IN <o ev 
'to o -* H, 
H '10 oo" en 


J l\ 

M 
M 


S 


f 


H 


o" o" 

rH 


rH IM rH 






1 




ffl 

1 


1 IO M 
11 Ol 'O 
CO O, 


H pji co in 

t- 01 # tg 

o) Tf IM in 


vji M in co o 

rH Ol iH O 
tO -?! 1 00 Ol 


P! rH CO H 'J 1 
J S rH L- 
M L- 10 I 1 


,_( CO 'O Ol 00 

o> o 01 co 

tD Ol CO ""T 

H 


M IO 

H 

T-H 


O (O rH C 
rH rH "* 
(M -:p rH 


a t- ^ L- oo e> 

M 01 I- CO to ' 
1 E- 01 oo, "> 

rH IO (O 


? ^J 




P 


K Ol 


co" to" 


H Ol i-f 








1 




^ 






1 1 1 




M 




j ! 


1 












i 
i 


1 






I t 








i 


1 


1 






1 

1 
I 








i 
m 


1 








1 
1 








W 


P 








i b PS 








-I 


^ 








I X5 W 








o 


*T 








I w o 




^puncfcioiial Classification 


1 "^ *l ' 

JO ^Ji 


Air Force 

Total 
MISSILES 

Army 


Air Force 
Total 

SHIPS Navy 
TRACKED COMBAT VEHI 
Army 


Navy 
Total 

ORDNANCE, VEHICLES, j 
RELATED EQUIPMENT 
Army 
Navy 


Defense Agencies/OSD _ 

Total 

ELECTRONICS AND 
COMMUNICATIONS 

Army 
Navy 


Defense Agencies/OSD 


OTHER PROCUREMENT 
Army 
Navy ~ 
Air Force 


iS "g 

O i ft5 '8 

W 1 P^ *U 1 

o> i O M H 

1 y-S *? ^ 

1 is ?^ 

"^< 'd 1 & 1 & 1 a> 
.| Jl 1 5 ,t! 'S 

aj PH 

4) O 

P ^ 



February 1966 







- CM iraoi 
g in oo in = 

^ rH TH rH r- 


CM USin PH r 
3 o> CO i< qn p 
in CM to 


< tr co co 

H 03 b-CO CO 


"O PS CO to O3C 
-1 to T-tpHC= 
HO CO 


is in s 

CO C 

00 P 


1 u; rH p 

IS ^ t ~ 


HC- pH toijl t 
O 1 tO t- CO G 
03 CM CMC- 


-en fli incM 

= N b- t-01 

1 CO Ol 


-i CO 
CO 


in moo 

1* n en ^ 






1 


H 








CM 


















tN 




."* 




[fl I 


^ 


















S 




.ti <. 

T3 t 

C c 

p 
It 



1 F~ P3 03 C 

H pH rH TH 
H 


CM O rH CO U 

m ol c-"" 


1 ^ tO^T CM * 

oi co en rH r 

O (DOS b- P 


* in CM * ol p 

-1 in CM CM PS 

H CO K 01 
IH" 


3 TH 1-11- 
CO CX 
O CN 


CM 00 M r- 
CO 00 in 

M PHPH 


o co en in cc 
a 1 -q- to rHe> 

03 M OSC-- 


in oscooe 

in b- US v f 
CO CM 


3 iH 
-1 Ol 

to 


ooooa 

OOOb-l 
pH rH CO 


'(CotnptroB. 
527 
ry 24, 1966 




















HI g 




U 


S 














S3 g 




U 

a 

T- 

> 


= 1- to 1JI 1C 

* to L- IP ce 

1 rH TH PH 
< 


OS Ol CO M f 
L- to CM CM 

in CM t- 


b- 00 COi-t t 
r-l t- b- FS i- 
O US CO CO r 

pH 


P lH I-HTP3P- 
O CMCMb. 

* (71 CO 


H Ol 
N -I 

cn CM 


en co us r- 

CM M pH 


01CMCOC- 

os oi in en 

03 CM IMC- 


11 inus o 
o oo toco 

b- PS 


CM 

S 


1-O1 


3 


JSP 


Ohr, 




I- 


< 
























H pH P5 tl 






i 




















u 




















a 

3 p* 


in co u? c 

rH i-H iH rH 


US O 03 C- O 

rH CT* co en T- 

tO CM US 


J- rH OS rH C 
O [- UJ CO r- 


in PSCM ^r q< 

OS CO 


p] rt o 

in P 
oo EM 


rH P- CM CM 
b- 00 b- 


O CM V CM CO 

us t- oo en rH 

OS M CMO 


in co us b- i- 
co 1>co oi l ~ 


1-1 1 
in o 


OO * O CO 

CM en 06 ocn 
in us o uso 






o t 


























i-J MOS 


w 






s t 




















o 2 


O 03 CM Ol 

to oo m o 

rH rH rH 1- 


c- o -* in b- 

tO rH 01 CO 


to cs -q- -CT u: 

Ol t- O to C- 
IH 


1* CM CM O 1 
IO Ol CM O 

en o 


CO TH CO 

S " 


O rH In PH 

11 o 01 

CO CM i-l 


[- CO "* IOTO 

co b- co eou: 


in ioo5c=.T- 
en co 


in 01 

tO PH 


CMCM UJpr-l 

oo in 1- TH 
into 05 in o 




s. 


g fc 


























iHrH 


3 


b- 






p 


















o* 


If 


















1 
IO 


2 


t- cP 
-I r-H 


en o 

inc 


es o> 01 rH 03 

CM 1DCM O 


IO -H OCMC1 

cr> os en o 01 

to 05 CO PH 

rH 


in CM CM 11 

O) CO 


b- iH U3 
03 CM 


C- CO t- CM 

in o PS 

CM CM IH 


M in CM 131 & 

* IM J r-l b- 
03 CM e^CM 


IfJ rH iH *f O 
b- b- tOOl-H 

r- 03 


t- 


corn co in t- 
cn 11 oioi co 
os co PHI in o 1 

rH rH CO tO 




w " 




















g 


>i 




















ll 


CM CM 1< l- 
10 Ol UJ O 


IO O5 IO 00 CM 

S ^SE" 


oo oj in o en 

O L- to 00 i-H 


OS H rH rH 

CO K co 


s; 

03 c-1 


01 t- CO CM 
CO CO b- 
CM rH rH 


b< b< t Ol in 

to to co co o 

CO Ol CM Ol 


W CO tOCO rH 
1- C- 03 C- r-l 
CO CM 


CO 11 


en en i< i< m 
.HTf mooc 




c 


*> ^, 










M 
















IH rH 


o 


to 




,-*. 


<< ^ 




















3 "5 >J 


licational 
'Y 1966 


US i-l CO OS 

in oo in o 

TH i-H r-1 rH 


CO cp IO O b- 

en o b- PI 
in TH CM t- 


O5 tO Ol CO O 
O if CO 00 CM 
p-< U3CO t- rH 


M CM -a 1 b- * 

I 1 0100 

oj 01 

T-H 


1- CM CO 

O CO 


O O i* rH 
10 OJCQ 
CO rH lH 


US I-HCO CO ID 
t- O100 O T 
CO CM COW 


co in 10 b- TH 

N b- t- O) -H 
Ol CM 


03 01 

in IH 


C4 IO C3 iH >H 

to 10 in TH en 
* in CM in t- 

HMM 1 us" 




7 T3 Q 

* g 

G 

8 *" w 


.n ^ 
O 

|i 


es oo o co 

tO t- P3 O 

rH 1-f rH H 


b- 03 00 L- 
.~ t- "* PS 


CO Ol OO b- rH 
US CM t- Ol 05 
UJ 03 C- rH 


OS rH 03 CO 

en co 

TH 


Ol rH O 

CO CO 
CO CM 


rH pH CO pH 
CO Ot -Vf 
CM i-ip^ 


H -! COCM if 

11 to inco * 

CO Ol 0101 


CO CM CO' 
1> C-tDt 
00 


H r* 
J> r-H 

^ 


10 N 

CO r-l 

in 


CM co in co os 

OCO t- rH 00 

11 co T-I in -fli 






* 
























iHlHCO" 


to 




o +^ P 





CM CM * 

to m t 


Tb- 
00 

H rH 


o oJ to 


oo en in o 01 

Ol M tO CO rH 
b- tO CO rH 


1i OS CO M vf 
03 rH i-l M 
CO CO 


* CO 
CQ CM 


CM t- co CM 
O CO b- 


b- b- b- en ir 

tO 1OOO CO rH 

co CM olel 


b- CO 1TJ03 rH 
in t- CO b- rH 
CO CM 


PS in 

in w 


O1O1 >f OS V 
rH 11 US Ol rH 

u3t-;O in 01 




E 


c H 








1-1 


CM 
















p-TrH CO 


us 




E a 1 -" 


EH * 


















"C o 




















td o 

P. > 

S 

P Q 


J._ 
1 


o to en co 
to co m o 

|H rH rH rH 


o m to to i^ 1 

o o CQ en 1-1 

ID rH CM t- 


J3 rH CO Ol O 
O CO O> (TJ Ol 
CM tO CO b- n 


CO CO rH CO N* 
7 CM CM CO 

IH 


tO CM O 
CO CO 

e> co 

r-l 


"O O O) 
O 01 rH 


-0 COOCM OS 

m in co r-i ii- 

fl N C001 


O t OO rH PH 
31 b" t- O TH 
CO 


IO TH 


en in co to 

O tD in rH ^ 

in m PS in o 

rHlHCO" 10 




J5" 


ra in 


















U 




















L, 

D 

01 

U) 


13 H 


COCO TH CO 
(O 00 to O 
rH r- rH pi 


M b- in o 

O1CO 


10 O 10 M O 
15 1OCOO 03 
r-t ID CO 00 rH 

r-H 


[- in 03 ol O 

- rH CM tO 

3) CO 


3 CO 
Jl Ol 


* in 10 TH 
o in 

M CM r-1 


rH COt-CON 
O CM tOiJi -H- 
1} CM CMCM 


3 t- US O l-H 
CO 


n 


in os u> PS b- 
a K i;rHin 




01 




























lH rHp- 




to 




tt 




























j 


i 


I 
























































1 






















1 












. 




















Q 










H 


















IH 










H 












1 


^ 


/*l 




















<< 


ItJ 






3 



















1-4 




3 






H 










o 






























1 










K 




B 






t5 





















g 




1 






$ 










s 








<( 




* 

1 


B 






.< 


5 








C 


m 


R p p p 

o o o o 




co a 

w g 




fl 

m 
o 


o 
5 


p 
w p 


y 


c 

a 

. 












'S "> > -- ti K. H 










E 








5 


o 


S S 9 S 


U SI Z 


"s 


<E 


S Co 


w 


E 








Puncti 


8 t 


1 I 1 I 

S pj a> Q 5 W g H 


'C 

J 


H fl 


G 
a 


r 1 ^- 

PJ 

D 
tu V 


p , 
5 E 

<] o 


J 


OTAL 










ra C *? C QD S "3 *3 b) M "3 P 


** 'n! te C-j C 


^3 FS ^ 


. -* 1 ^l^ 


r 


EH 








'"b^ 


I^S^b^^W^h 1 ^^ Hte>.^S t5 hhlSfib Sl^h 


t^slioh ^ 


||^ 


^ll.t 


c 










*^ p 5 Jn 


*t1 ^PS^*?* tJP^L, 1 --* ?^S^t- l H Si* *CRcr*i2j Oi 


e&* 


Sj fK (fl 


Ct] T M 


r" 










b.jjfcS 


R O^,H^P w^^^R PS5a3p $,< ' 2i B'3!2Q ^^Iz 


w ,rt^ 


Q MS 


^ 















R H w M^ H 


ra 


R 










!=< 


! H <! WO O 


S 


w 











Defense Industry Bulletin, 



31 



.2 

4- 

D 
_D) 

o ts 





.2 


"7 








in 






jj 








2 


a 






D 


r- 




4) 

i 

(^ 


I 


fc 

VI 


w 
ft 




U) 


C 


*?i 


Q 


4- 


,2 


3 




c 






partment of 




TJ 

C 
D 


Appropriaf 


'IN THOUS 


<u 








ft 


in 


o 






C 


c 






O 




i 






D 








D) 


"5 






1" 


k. 






Q 


0) 






O 


e 

0) 






T3 


O 





ft 

111 



O 1.- O CO 
IM CO -^ IM 
O O OO <M^ tH 



CO r- L- M 

IO CO (M 



co CO 
OO H tD 
OJ, ^ 
H CO" t* o 

CT> o i-t in 

O) (M CO (M 



oo in (M oo co 
co i-t co IN 

CO IO 




February 1966 



32 





Unexpended 
balance 
carried 




in o co 01 m 

O CD O rH CO 
CO O Ol O t- 

TjT in" of TjT T* 

Ol rH rH CO O 
rH CO t- CO rH 
tO m" Of rH 

rH 


-rf 
Ol 

o" 

Cl 

of 

CO 


1,949,437 


D (O 
5 

jf co" 
o m 

Jl CM 

* of 


Ol 

ira" 
in 
oo" 

rH 


rH 
Ol 

rH 
Ol" 
CO 

of 

rH 


t- r- 

CD in 

01 O) 

CD" o 

00 rH 
in rH 

IH" 


CO 

CO 

rH 

o" 

L- 

T-T 


2,144,437 


t- 

iH 
rH 




in 01 to oo TH 
oo t- 01 01 in 
cs_ co^ oa co c< 

in" co" of rn" -* 

in M 1 O rH tj 
CO Ttf to L> rH 

d co" co" IH" 
_j i 


CO t> 
CO C'l 
C0_ -5 

in ^ 

t- 01 

CO" H 


L- 

01 
of 

CD 

to 
in" 


(Comptroller) 
'.29 
ry 24, 1966 




T 
































M 1 


fl I g 
w P a 




||| 




rH Ol CD L in 
CO Ol CO T)l CC 
CD in t- rH rH 


rH 

co_ 


CO f 

2 * 

"*3* C 


i g 
i m 


O 
O 
CO 


O 
O 
00 




o 
o 




O 

O 












O fe h? 




22^ 

rt-o tl 
.t! c 




L L- CO" Iff Ol" 

Tco rH m oi 


rH" 
Ol 


r 
C 
C 


5 s 


oo" 


in" 




to" 
to 




to" 
















5 






































Expenditures 




OO -^ O Ol CO 
lO L- rH O rH 
CO CO O Ol L- 


Ol 

co 
"J, 


Jl O 

n *; 

00 r- 
01 C 
Ol T 

r-T i- 
^ 


1 CO 

! jo 


o 
n 

CO 


Ol 

CO 


O 

oo o 

CD O 


o 

o 

in 

01 

Ol 

of 
n 


o 

o 

in 

L- 
OJ 

rH 


o 
o 
o 

o" 
o 

Ol_ 

m 




in in m in o 

iH rH Ol *<* O 

^ co o os o 


O 


o o 

o" o" 
ID in 

rH rH 
t-" rH 

in 


o 
o 
o 
o" 
o 

CO 

oo" 
ira 




O CO CO --31 Ol 
O Ol rH to Ol 

co_ co oa co 

rH CO 00" Of 

rH rH rH 


f -*" r-i in" 
01 to co 

O *tf C- 

**" 10" of 

rH rH rH 


CO O 

t> o 

n rH 

co" 


CO" rjt of L- o" 

rH m o CD o 
in o co co TH 
CD" L-" of co" 

rH rH rH 


O 






































t- 

TJ 

C 
0) 

o. 

X 

m 


Total 
available 
for 
expenditure 




yi co oo oo oo 

Ol Ol O> CO CO 

oo in os o o 


T? 01 y 

r- 

ira in c 
xf oo" er 

00 L CC 
CO rH if 

Ol" CO" 

IT- co 


3< "# CO L- rH 
rH in CO Ol Ol 


00 b- 

CO CO 

oo" of 

01 iH 

OO TJH 

OS 


co" 

Ol 




O -^ rH CO rH 
O Ol 01 L- 1O 
^f Ol CO 1-- eia 


oo IT- 
CO CO 
C0_ ^ 

L " IH" 

O to 
01 

o" co" 


of 
to 

OS 

CO 
CD 




co m -^ co rH 

00 O d Ol CM 

t Ol t- ^J* 

rH Ol Ol 


o" oo" oo" 01" o" 
t- 01 co in rH 

Ol^ CS^ r-^ rH^ O] 

co co of in 

Ol CO CO 


i> 

C 


t-" rH" Ol * 
OS iH t- Tf 
^H ^J' CO Ol 

in" co" m" 

CO O3 


Im 
































rH 


rH 




& 







































O 


p S 




o o o o 


t 


3 O 






























i*> y 




CJ O O O 


<_ 


3 (^> 




























15 


iS 

M rt 




oo in o co 


R P 




























o K. 






co" co" o" t>" 


j 


n if* 




























n: N 


S 'E ji 




rH CO >* rH 


in in 




























"3 5 O 


H Q 




rH 
1 
































% < ~ I 






1 






































































t,. C o ^ 
9 3 r- W 

g | C o 


New 
obligational 
authority 




CD co L- co in 

rH Ol rH Ol CO 
O L- CO L- rH 


00 00 
CD O CD 

co" o" co" 

CO CO Ol 

CO TH Tf 

Of rH 


CV ^ rH in tO 

co oo m co CD 

CO ^ tO 01 t- 


^d* c^ 
o 

rH 
00" 0" 

Si 


I 




7,116,394 


O O CD O 
O O O O 

01 01 m T]I 


O O 
= O 

t-" t-" 
CO TH 
i m 

co" 


O 


S 




co" TjT co" I-H" itf 

O -^ rH Ol O 
O^ 00^ Ol^ rH rH 

Ol T) 1 " Ol" CO" 
rH rH rH 


in" co" to in CD 

L- CO t> OS O 
O_ CO -^ t-^ rH 

t-" co" 01" co" 


Ol Ol CO CO 

in ^ 01 co 

O1 K Ol^ L~ rH 
CD O CO" 


J_, U ^^ 








^ 




rH i- 


i <. 


4 




O 








rH 


rH Ol 


n 


i 




rt C ^ fe 






































0) I^ 






































Q 1 I 

3 
^ 
O 


Unexpended 
balance 
brought 
forward 




CO CO Ol O CO 
O O 00 -tf O 
O CO rH CD Ol 


CD 01 n 

CO rp 

r-T CO" ->^" 
1 01 rH 
O O O 

o" TH" of 

CO CO 


in o co 01 in 

O tO O rH CO 
CO Ol rH 


I ^, 

o of 

1 Ol 

r -H 


i 
i 

r 

i 




to 

O 
O 

00 

in 

0] 

of 


* rH L- H 
O) (M CO U) 
E- rH O] Ol 


00 t- 

CO CO 
rH -rf 

O -* 
01 rH 
rH Ol" 


b 

rH 




CO Co" CO O) CO" 
CD ip 00 O rH 
CO rH CO Ol rH 
IO "^ CO rH 
rH 


tf in 01 Tf Tj5" 

Ol iH rH CD O 
rH to^ t-^ CO rH 

to" in" of >H" 

rH 


ira of co o 

M< CD CO rH 
lt^ -* in rH 
OO" Ol" rH 
t"H rH 


a 






































"D 


































o 


































D 


































E 


































7 












p 












p 










u3 




rH 








H 


























^ 








EH 












ti 














H 








3 












^ 














O 






4J 


t i 










, 


hH 














<j 






M 


EH 










1o 


H 






In 








il 






1 


? 










'at 


OJ 
H 






'w 
ta 








Ol 






n 


1 










' 


t- 






"1 








rH 


d> 






CO 


Q 






*H 


CD 




rt\ <^1 








PH 


O 


WJ 


S 


01 
rH 


S 




fn 


S 


Ol 
rH 




5 w g 











& r^ 


o 

4J 
I- 1 


e{3 

M 




o 




O 

3 


a 


"5 


t*i 


o S 
>,& '-6 ^ 








FISCAL Y 


j rf ,|H Q 
<] ^i <j CO 

tn *y *H 'o 
o o o H O 


Military Fun< 
Assistance. 


Mil. Function 


W H JJ; 

.j <a 4> 
5 3 

w *8 o 

^ 11 


a> 



"8 
1 


Agencies/OSD 

ifense _ _ 

-Military Funi 
Assistance 


-Mil. Functions 


FISCAL YE^ 


P > . ^ ^ w 

1^38 
<5 ^ < fe .. '43 

1511 & I 

4H *H H g JS fc 
O S 4) 5 .S 

ti^-p as | a a 
1 s s^S a ^ s 










<P<P<(_l'E> P-4 1^1 -1 

Q)a><U(O.G c ^i^ c^ 


O, ft 

Q) <U 


1 


ta 
1 


"^ hi. 

p "3 & 3 

^ 8 1 & 


HI in 3 | 3 










ppp po g 




pp 


P 


P 


o S 






PPPPO 





Defense Industry Bulletin 



33 




41 

I & 
^jj^ 

oj < S 

*H e 
a ofc 

SaS 
SJ o-- m 

lll 



February 1966 



34 



| 


t- 




















01 to O C 
" rH CO OC 
_ CO L- 

(H tO" r- 

T-H 


00 to r-l rH CO CO Ol a 
1 O L- CO IO tO -Ht-K 

CO I> OTOTC-CO OTOOO. 


CO ID CO OT CO 
C> O Ol OT CO 
^ OT In IO rH 

to" to" 

rH 


CO 
CO 
OT 

co" 


CO L- 

CO r- 

co" 


ir 
if 
a 
a 


to 01 01 -* c^ 

rH IO *f OT Q~ 
rH OT OT t- r- 
L-" to" O~ CO" 


00 t- 

CO r- 

OT a 
oo" 


II 1 

If 
ex 
o 


1 S w 

H 

l" C, 


CO 10" LO" rH" rH rf r- 
T-H rH 




1C 






IO 


in 


ir 


rH H Ol 


in 


ir 


3 E S 




to 






















01 C-1 O O 
rt IO to O 
^ IO 00 t 


rHrH COOOOCO tOt>rH 
rHrH tOOOTO COtOrH 
OOT COtOlOCO TttrH^ 


rH rH O to L- 
00 OS O to O 
00 L. in to rH 


CO C 

to <y 


CO O 
CO L- 
00 rt< 


cc 


in 05 t to t- 

1- CO L- OT O 
O CO Tp 1- rH 


00 
CO L- 
CO Tji 


oc 

C 


w Q 2 




(i, 2 I ~ l 


rHrH a)r - |rH -*rHrH 


OT to" Of 


T-T 


rH" r- 


CO 


L- CO" Of CO" 


rH rH 


C^ 1 


" L- m * 

< "1 ri 








rH 


co 


to 


to 


rH rH OT 


to 


tc 


O d, -= 




g OS rH 0) 

S OT in OT 

tO L- 

i" OT" rH 
t* rH 


Ol CO OT IO IO rH rH Ol Ol 

coto Sto ""* COCOL- 


tO CO OT rH in 
CO CO rf CO O 
00 ^ O to rH 
CO" to" rH~ 

rH 


I- CO 
IO OT 
IO rH 

OT" 


CO 

to co 

CO r- 
OT" r-I 


CO 
CT 

O 


co in 01 01 in 

O TJ< rH OT O 
O CO O1_ i-H M 

OT" * oT " 


CO O 

to co 

CO r-| 

OT r^ 


d- 

a- 
c 




q 1 " Ol" in" OT" rH~ rH i-T 
rH rH 










^ 


M 1 


IO 


rH rH rH 




IO 




i 


< CO CO CO 
2 I- (M 
OT L- Ol 

^ OT" rH 

t. rH 


3110 otoo . cocooj 

Op -tf l~ (D 01 10 CO 

Ol L to to o O CO CO 


IO rf OT -t)l Ol 
^f CO Tfl T(I rH 
tO_ OT OT tO rH 

10" to" 


CO rH 

Til Ol 

Ol CO 

S ' 


01 O 
OT 

OT O 

OT" rH 


Ol 

OT 

o" 


CO Ol tO rH Ol 
rH OT Tfl IO rH 

of -^<" of 01" 


Ol 
01 
OT O 
OT" r-T 


cv 

CT 




<*" rH 1 in co" c-f of i4 

rH rH 


"o 








IO 


*tf 


IO 


H H i-l 




if: 




CK 

o *o 


D rH OT tO 
2 CO L- OT 
tfl to O 


OTtO 010lOT^-~. O>(001 
O1O) COtOCO" IO L rj< 
rH"* OOOTOT'~' OTrHL- 


-- CO **i< O tO ^~ . 
tO OT O OT O] - 
tO OT OJ IO iH '' 


rH 


-* IO 
OT OT 
L"~ CO 


OT 
rH 


rH to O> Ol to 
CO CO L- L~ OT 


J> Ol 


CD 
rH 




C i 


I* rH rH 
i, rH 


CO rH 10" CO (M rH r-i" 


to" to" I-H" 


o" 


0> rH' 


rH 


tO Ol rH in rH 
rH lo" o" Ol" 


OT" rH* 


i-; 

r-i 










rH 


IO 


M* 


IO 


rH H Ol 










-M 




















x<> 


^ IO CO 

2 -^ co 01 
>o to 01 


COOT tOOl-,~, OlOt- 
OTIO TtfcOtO* 1 COt^-OT 


tO CM Ol L- ., 
I- TJI OT Ol "" 


n< co 

CO CO 
Ol CO 


CD t> 
CO IO 


CO 
CM 


rH t- CO 00 l- 
^ IO rH L- IO 


to i~ 


CO 
CM 




>- 


>. ,4 


CO" rn" 10" CO <M" H rH" 
rH rH 


10" to" 

1-^ 


co" 


L-" IH" 


OT" 


OT" -^" OT" I-H" 


CO IO 


oT 




.J^U. 










rji 


"* 


rH rH rH 


Tf 


Tj 


H 


a- 

3 i- 


in o o 

H Ol to OT 

to to i- 

* " 


M'CM COOOtO. i T^IOIO 
"^O Ol b- r)< B COCOO1 


tD CO rH 
rH CO tD Jo 
L-^ O^ O 

rH tD rH 


to to 
oo to 
to co 


rH in 
OT CO 
CO t> 

^"^ 


to 
o 

rH 

co" 


rf i-H ^ Ol 
r-f CO 00 01 
OT rf 00 O 

OT" Ol" l>" r-f 

rH rH 


r-( 1O- 
OT 00 

rH" rH~ 


to 

o 

iH 
CO 


rJi 


Ol" 0" -sfT Ol" Ol" rH 

rH rH 


u 
O.t 


D 

n t- -^ IO 

H CO l> iH 

to co i> 

u 


JS ^ ^iS^cT" COOTO 

OTfH OTCO^" Ol-evl 
OCO OTOrH^-^ t-^t- 


rH O * 
01 tO CO 

t- to n co 


00 O 
IO CO 


CO rH 
Ol CO 

to^ co 


OT 
IO 
OT 


OT O tO CO 
CO L- OT L- 


CO r-t 
01 CO 


Ol 
IO 

ai_ 


I 
5 S 

p ,S 

" 


Ol O IO Ol rH r-T 


' TJ S3 C 


H rH 


rH rH 


rH in -H 


iH 


o" rn" 


r-T 


Ol" r-T 00" r-T 


O i-H 




M S 


<u O 0) M , 








""^ 


*^* 


Tf 


rH rH 


TJ1 


T| 


-jj 


a D)"B.^ i 

m o ^ r 


5 33 

L- (O to 
* t-f 


CO I-- L- to CO ^x LO Ol rH 

OTco toto^H ^fooc^ 

OTrH rHOTOT" .OOlt- 


** L- IO t- 
O L- CO IO 
CO l> W 


co in 

CO 


CO IO 
tO rH 


CO 
CO 


rH O CO IO 
CO OT H IO 
CO 00 t- Ol 


CO IO 

to i-y 

i-H IO 


CO 
00 

tc 


I 


jQ ^ < ? & 


rH 


rH O to" CO r-T 
rH rH 


rH 


i-T 


rH rH 


of 


Ol" rn" CO rH 


rH rH 


O3 


^ 1^ 


*H > C > 


a 








^ 


*d' 


rH H 


Tji 


* 


'" "o! 


Z * S fo 2 


' CO t- t- 
1 OT O tD 
CO tO 10 



-^ ?H^ to Ci CO ***** C3 O> 4D 


CO IO in O 
CO * 00 CO 
OT_ CO O rH 
CD" Ol" Ol" 


L- 
CO Ol 
CO^ IO 


L- 

L- CO 

to" i-T 


L-- 

CO 

O 
co" 


rH SO Ol t- 1 
CO O CO t- 
L- IQ L'- l> 

l?~ O l> 


t- 

l> CO 
to" r-T 


L- 
CO 
O 

00 


I s | 


rH O 1ft C*f r-i 

rH r-t 


-2 > n ^ . 








CO 


CO 


CO 


rH rH 


CO 


CO 


So a 
'a * 


=3 D * rH 

f 2 " * -. J "~ 

<> 3 :* 
Q 0.5^ 


rH CO IO 
rH H rH 

Tjl tO IO 


rH 


7> ^f O> lO ID r \ t-- Ol O} 

ro co IQ CQ co ri Tt* tc T^ 

lOt- lOrHCO*-' CSJ-^iO 


<# 10 10 10 

OT CO rH f 

r-T of rH" 
rH 


C-1 t- 

# oo 

to" 

CO 


IO 00 
1O rH 

to" of 

CO 


CO 

oo" 

CO 


Ol O t- tO 
t- OT OT to 

to 01 to to 

t-" L-" 
rH rH 


O OO 
O rH 

M C^ 

to" of 

CO 


CO 

co" 

CO 


o T! </t 

SCg al 
U fi 
W A 

1*, y 
S 


rH Ol yf <M" rn" 
rH 


u 2"" s 

C* * 

o ft fr 


to 01 10 

OT rH Ol 

in 10 Tj< 


rH 


COtO CMtOL- OrHrH 
ra 1- Ol L~ Ol ^ CM OT 
rn" CO CO r-T 


O CO OT 1 
OT 01 rH J 
-^ 00 | 

OT rH Ol | 


t- o 

CO IO 
OT L- 

3" 1 


L- tO 
CO rH 
rH 

CO" r-T 


CO 

o 

CM 


* CO t- fc- 
IO * rH tD 
CO to 10 tO 

i-^ OT" 10" 


L- to 
00 rH 
rH CD 

'O' i-T 


CO 

o 


g a ,a 

R u a jj 
P. S ,S v 

rj W SJ tjj 


M 








CO 


CO 


CO 


rH 


o 


CO 


,& 6 'O 


-B !? 

a 2 


O Ol ** 

in to OT 
to co **" 
o" 


J-lfO OT * ^, L-L-0 
^r L^ OT CO *O i Ol Ol to 
*_O^ OlOTrH' ' 1OCOOT 
H CO T!< rH 


3 CO OT Ol 
N CO rH 
-^ L- CO rH 


t- 


CO 
L- Ol 


rH 
OT 


SrH t- tO 
01 CO tO 
t- Ol rH tO 


5 
- Ol 


rH 
OT 


41 ^ M 


* to ^ 


i-H 


H 


^- rH ^ 


o 

CO 


O",H" 

CO 


I-H" 

CO 


t-" o" of 

rH rH 


D"H" 
19 


rH" 


fl 5 -s 


TJ *fc ^ 




















3 e3 " -a 


3 *** " 


to 10 i> 

tO rH CO 
Ol CO CO 

1-T 


S3 rHOlOT^-- OIOIOC 
UtO MitOIOn OTOTCO' 
3^-^ O UB t- OTCOOOI 


in oo o 

to o 
O rH CO rH 


o 
o> 
in 


O OT 
OT (O 


Ol 
IO 
CO 


L- 0] rH rH 
C- rH rH OT 


3 Ol 

JJ to 
t- 


Ol 
IO 
CO 


% m M V 

? 5 ""* o 
^ 9 S "0 

" !Ti c 


^ 


rH 


*j 01 in OT i 

""* r 


H 


CO 


CO 


8 


OT OT rH 
rH rH ( 


* of 
o 


CO" 
CO 


h 8 M 'S 
j3 d -K 


"^ 


111 , 














!!-& 


^ J5 


II) ' 1 


1 1 


j ^> j_* 'rj 


^ 


C I t T) W ' , 


1 1 


S^ r* 




O i <u M M) J w 


1 1 


y o rS 


0) 
D 

O 

1 


'"SI! 5 ' t* 'a i 
o ^u rt R a c 
<S ! ! M -S rt fi I 

II! S -S -g S tf ^ g 

rt i R 'P S S ** K P 
^!! 5 ^ 18 ,9 c -n" a> > 

T3 i I R -P $ 8 S ^ y 

|i?>. 3 l^-lf I I N 

pO|jfjJ T3 ^ " " fj **fi _., 


New Obligational Avail. __. 
.nsfers from prior year balance 


New Obligational Authority 
tary Assistance 


Military Assistance 


1 1 

1 1 

i ] * 

>i i i MM 

i i s s s 

j ' o i 4* 

^ 6 fe S 

hfiSrlQ ft, t,]l' 

< g a w w^ 
Bs ? &S fr! . 
| ^ 5 ^ g ,-g J .-8 ' 

3'H'H'HH HloW>, 
^OooRai^-H^HE? 

fnifl'O- 

q lll *S 5 >.^!i I 

'E'C'E2 f: 'r t!r & 
sSrtg^EH^H 


Amount included in entry for "OrdnaE 
Excludes authority in Stock Ponds (1 
received in subsequent years. Such an 




j3 , $ ^ 3 !E 2S 


ft A ft H '5 S ' 

4) .5 K 


1 a ,a o 

rfl 




K S fr O M EH g 


QOQ Qo ^ 


5 



Defense Industry Bulletin, 



35 



Department of Defense 

Estimated Expenditures for Vietnamese Special Support 
Fiscal Years 1966 and 1967 



(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 




Military Personnel 

Operation and Maintenance 

Procurement ~^~T~T'~~ 

Research, Development, Test, ami Evaluation 
Military Construction 

Total 

^ . 

NOTE: Amounts Include expenditure, from the $1-7 billion 



1,140 
1,898 
1,307 
30 
260 



2,494 
2,854 
4,447 
80 
460 



FY 100G Amendment, nnd tlio $0.7 billion FY 1005 SunplomcnUl. 




IB v r < ' - 

DOD Labor Surplus Area Programs 



New criteria for labor surplus areas 
conforming to those contained in the 
Public Works and Economic Develop- 
ment Act of 1085 (PL 89-136) have 
been incorporated in the Department 
of Labor "Area Trends in Employ- 
ment and Unemployment" used by De- 
fense Department procurement ami 
small business/economic utilization 
specialists in making labor surplus 
area determinations. 

Labor surplus area procurement 
actions are affected by the following; 
changes: 

An effective date (Dec. 16) in the 
case of the October-November issue of 
the Department of Labor "Area 
Trends" is now sot forth in the publi- 
cation for use in procurement _ and 
will be in each subsequent issue giving 
three weeks lead-time for new listings. 

A shift from a monthly to an an- 
nual review of "persistent" labor 
surplus 'areas, i.e., those areas which 
have had a substantial unemployment 
rate of six percent or more, and which 
were either 50 percent above the na- 
tional average for three of four pre- 
ceding calendar years, or 75 percent 
for two of three preceding calendar 
years, or 100 percent above the na- 
tional average for one of the two 
preceding calendar years. 

The classification of certain cities 
of 260,000 or more as "persistent 
labor surplus areas, started in June 
1964, will continue providing they 
meet certain Departments of Labor 
and Commerce criteria for such cate- 
gories. Cities listed as "persistent" 
labor surplus areas are Oakland and 
San Diego, Calif.; Miami, Fla.; New- 
ark, N.J.! and Philadelphia and Pitts- 
burgh, Pa, 



. Under the revised criteria all 
"persistent" and "substantial" areas 
are eligible for preferences m I'edera 
procurement (in the form of partial 
set-asides in DOD). All persistent 
areas nro eligible for benefits includ- 
ina grants under all titles of the 1 ub- 
Hc Works and Economic Development 
Act of 19G5, and Small Business Ad- 
ministration Loan Assistance at the 
four percent rate. Substantial areas 
may also bo eligible for such benefits, 
at least to include Public Works 
grants under Title I of the Act. 

All areas which wore substan- 
tial or persistent on March 1, 1965, 
will continue to he eligible for Public 
Works Economic Development Act 
assistance until the first annual re- 
view of eligibility under the latter 
Act, which is presently scheduled ior 
completion in Juno 1966, 

Under the new criteria and stand- 
ards, the number of areas of sub- 
stantial or persistent nomploy- 
ment as of November 1966 totals 527 
(188 substantial and 389 persistent, 
plus five cities) broken down as 
follows: . 

. 20 major areas (10 substantial 
and .10 persistent plus five cities). 

.88 small areas (39 substantial 
and 49 persistent), 

419 very small areas (139 sub- 
stantial and 280 persistent). 

Eight states have major labor 
surplus areas designated either per- 
sistent or substantial or both; 
California 'and Pennsylvania have six 
each, followed by Massachusetts with 
four, West Virginia with three, New 
Jersey and Puerto Rico with two each 
and Florida and Minnesota with one 
each. 



Air Force Tests New 
Search and Rescue Devio 

The Air Force has completed 
series of night tests on a new de% 
which, when installed in aircraft, n 
simplify present day search i 
rescue procedures. 

Known as the C-141 Leigh Or. 
Position Indicator, the device cons 
of a beacon transmitter encased i: 
tumbling airfoil and tuned to 
standard Air Force emergency 1 
quency. 

Flight tests consisted of nine ' 
ejections of the crash position li 
cator made from a Lockheed C- 
Starllftor at the Air Force bysto 
Command's Air Force Missile 
velopmont Center, Holloman A 
N.M. 

The crash position indicator is 
cated in tin escape hatch behind 
wing of the aircraft and is flush \ 
the skin of the fuselage. Under en 
goney conditions a series of seiu 
indicate the emergency teethe aii 
component causing a spring to 
its leading edge into the airstr 
after which the airfoil automatic 
ejects itself from the aircraft, 

The airfoil, made of styrofc 
(hitters to the ground like a huge.. 
ing loaf. From its position on. 
ground or water the indicator to 
casts its location to search pai 
seeking survivors from the craan. 
Two additional missions are plai 
for early 1906 when a crash reco 
will also be tested m conjunetion 
a small tape cassette maide the 
bling airfoil section on one o-f 
aircU. By including the radio 

mission recorder in the era ipac 
the pilot's last transmissions 
the aircraft are preserved for >w 
determining the cause of the -.m 
Recorders in current mi UWi 
civilian aircraft are often tote 
upon impact if the aircraft eras* 

February } 



Supplemental Budget For Southeast Asia 

(Continued from Page g) 
drug for fulciparum malaria and a 
wide variety of surveillance devices 
weapons, munitions and personal 
equipment. 
Military Construction. 

As shown on Table 3, the bulk 
of the $1.2 billion requested for mili- 
tary construction is for facilities in 
Southeast Asia; the balance is for a 
variety of supporting facilities along 
the lines of communication back to 
the United States and, to a small 
extent, for training and troop facil- 
ities within the United States. The 
$1,238 million requested in this Sup- 
plemental, together with the $166 
million provided by the August 
Amendment, will make a total of 
$J,404 million available for construc- 
tion in support of Southeast Asia in 
FY 1966, $3(55 million more than the 
entire appropriation for military con- 
struction in FY 1965. 

The explanation for this largo re- 
quest lies in the nature of the military 
operation we have undertaken in 
Southeast Asia. South Vietnam itself 
is primarily an agricultural country; 
the only major port is Saigon. The 
deployment of large U.S. military 
forces, and other friendly forces 
such as the Korean division, in a 
country of this sort requires the 
construction of new ports, warehouse 
facilities, access roads, improvements 
to highways loading to the interior 
of the country and along the coasts, 



troop facilities, hospitals, completely 
'-w airfields and major improvements 
to existing airfields, communications 
facility, etc. We will be prepared 
to house and support additional units 
'l their deployment should be re- 
quired , the future. Since construc- 
tion IB a long lead time activity, the 
great bulk of this requirement has 
to be financed in the FY 1966 Sun- 
Plemental In order to provide some 
flexibly m the utilization of these 
nmds, we are requesting that $200 
million of the $1,238 million total 
program be appropriated to "Military 
Construction, Defense Agencies" for 
later transfer to the Military Depart- 
ments as required. 

Although I cannot assure you that 
the funds requested in this Supple- 
mental will complete our construction 
program in Southeast Asia, since we 
do not know how the conflict there 
may evolve, I can tell you that the 
amount included in the FY 1967 
Budget for military construction is 
very much smaller. 

Financial Requirements. 



is the Supplemental for Southeast 
Asia which I have discussed, and the 
firth column shows the total, $63,- 
308,175,000 in new obligational au- 
thority, which would be available for 
the current fiscal year if the military 
and civilian pay supplemental and 
the Southeast Asia Supplemental are 
enacted as requested. . . . 

Additional Authorizations. 

The additional amounts requested 
to be authorized for aircraft, missiles, 
naval vessels and tracked combat 
vehicles and RDT&E, are shown in 
Tables 5 through 7. The additional 
military construction authorizations 
are identical to the amounts requested 
for appropriation, as shown 
Table 3. 



on 



Table 4 summarizes our finan- 
cial requirements for the current 
fiscal year. The first column shows 
the amounts thus far enacted, less 
the $1.7 billion Amendment which is 
shown in the second column. The 
third column shows the net additional 
amounts required in FY 1966 to de- 
fray the costs of the pay raises en- 
acted last year. The fourth column 

Table 1 

Summary of Force and Personnel Increases Related to 
11 ^crease in Army Forces 

a. Division and Initial Support Forces 

b. 3 Brigades and Initial Support. Forces 

c. Aviation Companies 

Q> Sustaining Support for 1 Division 1 Tii*f i i 

* JjLijjjjuit 101 COS 

f. Expand training base and pipeline 

Total Army 

2. Increase in Marine Forces ~" 

a. 1 Division 

b. Activate forces to be deployed to Vietnam 
c- flring units to be deployed to full strength 
a- expand training and support base 

e. Provide increased pipeline 

Total Marine Corps 

* Increase in Naval Forces 

a. Retain ships 

b. Activate or procure ships 

c. Increase manning for deployed ships and bases in Southeast Asia 
a. Augment coastal and river patrol 

e. Augment construction forces 
t Support of Marine Forces 
S- Flight training 

Total Navy 



The President, in his State of the 
Union Address to the Congress on 
January 13, discussed the reasons for 
our greater military involvement in 
Southeast Asia and the resulting in- 
creases in Defense expenditures. I 
have attempted in this statement to 
outline the purposes for which the 
additional funds requested in this 
Supplemental are required. I can as- 
sure you that my associates in the 
Dafenw* Department and I have re- 
viewed this Supplemental with great 
care, and we now stand ready to help 
you in every way we can to facilitate 
the passage of the necessary legisla- 
tion. 



Southeast Asia 



Approved 
AUK. Q5 



Revised 
Jan. GG 



235,000 



306,667 



30,000 



85,169 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



35,000 



56,450 



Table 1 Continued 
Summary of Force and Personnel Increases Related to Southeast Asia 

4. Increase in Air Forces 

a. B-62 aircraft deployed to Guam 

b. Tac, Ftr. and Troop Carrier Squadrons deployed to SEA and their CONUS 

rotation base 

c. Raise airlift aircraft utilization rates 

d. Expand training 

e. Other support (including logistical base) 

Total Air Force 

Total Active Force Military 

Adj. for substitution of civilians 

Other adjustments 

Net Increase 

5. Increased Readiness for Reserve Components 



Army : 

a. To raise 3 Division and 6 Brigade Forces to 100% manning 

b. To man other ANG units at 'their authorized strengths 

Total Army 

Marine Corps: 

e. Reserve Division/Wing Team 

Air Force: 

d. 9 F-100 Squadrons 

e. 4 RF-84 Squadrons 

f. 1 Tac. Control Group 

g. 11 C-124 Squadrons 

Total Air Force 

Increase in Direct Hire Civilian Personnel 



a. Army 

b. Navy (Including Marine Corps) 

c. Air Force 

d. Defense Agencies 

Total Personnel 

Adjustment for substitution of civilians 

Other adjustments 

Net Increase 



40,000 
340,000 



340,000 



2,500 

1,667 
097 

2,205 

4,569 



11,600 

16,600 

7,300 

1,362 

36,762 



63,24 

510,52 

-74.3C 

+16.6S 

452,84 



18,51 
20,01 
38,51 

2,5C 

1,8* 
6 
4E 

2,2t 

5,01 



35,762 

Selected Reserve Force lo 100 percent la being; provided 




n Wns to be 

b The remaining ll.BOO personnel required to raise the manning of the 
tloii from units for which there IB no requirement In th eontinscncy pinna. 

He.pi-ea.mtB increase over the end FY 1000 Army National Guard drill piy sirens* of 380,000 provided for in the FY 1900 APP. 



by reiHstrl 



Table 2 
Recapitulation of Military and Civilian Personnel Authorizations 



Budgeted Strength Increased 
KB of C/3Q/G6 Proposed 08 
- - - - of AUK. 05 
and Jan. 00 



Active Duty 

Mi litary Personnel 

Army 

Navy 

Marine Corps . 
Air Force 



Per Original 

Budget 
(1) 



Direct Hire 
Civilian Personnel 



Army 

Navy (Incl. USiMC) _ 

Air Force 

Defense Agencies 

Total 



(a) 



953,094 306,657 

684,848 55,450 

193,190 85,169 

809,134 63,246 

Total 2,640,266 510,521 



Adj. for 

Substitution 

of Civilians 

(3) 



36,500 
-16,000 
- 2,800 
-20,000 



317,152 31,183 

320,125 21,400 

286,099 18,355 

40,778 4,893 

964,154 75,781 +58,000' 



+ 26,686 
+ 14,415 
+ 17,000 



* Denotes a small decrease In strength after end FY 1066. 

* Excludes 2,500 additional Indirect Hire Civilians, bringlnn the total to 60,600. 



Other 

Adjustment 



+ 10,432 
+ 2,675 
+ 2,626 
+ 980 



-16,947 
+ 6,963 
-12,737 
+ 18,177 
4,664 



Not 

Increase 
Proposed 

(6) 



280,599 
43,026 
84,994 

44,225 



-74,300 +16,622 462,843 



40,771 
42,768 
22,618 
23,070 
129,227 



Strength Increase to 

be Realized 

By Alter 

0/30/60 8/B&/65 

(0) (7) 



205,949 

88,876 4,1 

56,889 28,101 

45,364 ^U& 

347,077 105,781 



42,480 
37,476 
15,279 
27,77 
122,962 



Defense Industry Bull* 



i ox* c Tabl e 3 

1966 Supplemental for Procurement, RDT&E 

Related to Southeast Asia 

(NEW OBLIGATIONAL AUTHORITY 
IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 



Procurement 

Ammunition Consumption 

Aircraft 

Attrition 

Equip, of New Units ~~I~! 

Spares 

Other A/C Equipment ~_ J 

Total Aircraft _ _ 

Vehicles 

Elect. & Comm. _""""" 

Other -_rill 

Total Procurement 

RDT&E 

Military Construction 

South Vietnam 

Other Locations ] 

Planning __ _ ~~ ~~" 

Total Program 

To be Approp. to Mil. Dept. 

To be Approp. to Def. Agencies Z.~Z 

Total Appropriation _ 



* Included in tlio Nnvy. 

Note: Dotnll may not add to totab duo to roundlnr. 



Army 



671 




510 



Navy 



366 



562 



255 



Marine 
Corps 



338 



71 
42 

J>6_ 
517 



Air 
Force 



768 



837 



71 

110 

198 

16 

324 

274 



274 



Defense 
Agencies 



200 

"200" 



Total 



2133 




t. , . Tabl 4 

Financial Summary of FY 1966 Budget Including the Proposed 
Supplemental for Southeast Asia 

(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 



Military Porsonnol, Army 



Military Personnel,' A.F.'J" " ~ ~" 
National Guard Personnel, "Army"" 
Keservo Personnel, Army 
National Guard Personnel, A.F. 
Reserve Personnel, Navy _ 
Reserve Personnel, M.C. _ "~I 
Reserve Personnel, A.F ~~~~ 

Retired Pay, Defense ' " 

Total Military 




Opor. & Maint., Navy 
Oper. & Maint. M.C 



NOA 

E nnc led 

Excluding 

Amendment 



4,092,291 



4,393,800 

271,800 

238,600 

71,300 

105,100 

33,000 

60,600 

1,529,000 

14,600,291 



& Maint,, A,F _________ 

& Maint,, Def. Agencies .IT"" ' 






(1,700 

Million 

Amendment 



Military 

and 
Civillon 

Pay 
Supplemental 



222,100 

182,600 

42,400 

227,600 

4,500 



3,500 

4,600 

1,600 

1,200 

71,000 

761,100 



33,400 

23,000 

1,064 

27,600 

14,366 

2,000 

1,000 



S.E.A. 
Supplement^ 



833,600 
818,500 
184,600 
219,300 

46,900 
7,500 

6,700 



2,200 
2,700 

1,620,000 



1,077,200 

606,000 

102,600 

644,900 

41,769 

35,700 

8,100 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Totfi] 
NOA 



6,147,991 

3,566,100 

976,900 

4,840,700 

322,200 

246,100 

80,500 

109,700 

36,800 

64,400 

1,600,000 

16,981,391 



4,544,667 

3,821,137 

295,756 

4,976,237 

739,805 

246,496 

247,100 

459 

24,000 



Table 4 Continued 

Financial Summary of FY 1966 Budget Including the Proposed 
Supplemental for Southeast Asia 

(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 





16,000 






15,000 




579 


11 


, 


590 


Total Oper, & Maint, 


12,492,556 


102,421 


2,316,269 


14,911,246 


PROCUREMENT 












1,204,800 


504,500 


2,466,000 


4,174,300 


Proc, of A/C & Msls, Navy 


2,220,387 


190,200 


764,600 


3,176,087 




1,590,500 






1,690,600 




1,136,000 


167,090 


607,500 


1,909,590 




43,800 


149,100 _ _ 


616,600 


709,600 




3,516,700 


158,800 .. 


1,585,700 


5,261,200 




771,900 


4,000 


63,700 


839,000 




829,100 


360,600 


1,016,400 


2,206,100 




15,200 






16,200 




11,327,387 


1,534,290 


7,019,400 


19,881,077 


RES., DE.V., TEST, & EVAL. 










RDT&E, Army 


1,433,988 




27,995 


1,461,983 


RDT&E, Navy 


1,513,130 




52,570 


1,665,700 


RDT&E, Air Force _ 


3,181,956 




71,085 


3,253,041 


RDT&E, Defense Agencies 


491,300 






491,300 




19,426 






19,426 


Total RDT&E 


6,639,800 




161,650 


6,791,450 


MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 












346,843 


64,600 


609,700 


921,143 




329,405 


43,210 


254,600 


627,215 


Military Constr., A.F, .. 


361,773 


67,900 


274,100 


693,773 




19,768 




200,000 


219,768 














9,500 






9,500 


Mil. Con., A. P. Res. 


4,000 






4,000 


Mil Con., Army N.G. _ _ _ 


10,000 






10,000 


Mil Con,, Air N.G. __ _ 


10,000 






10,000 




5,000 






5,000 


Total Mil. Constr. __ 


1,096,289 


166,710 


1,288,400 


2,500,399 


FAMILY HOUSING 












666,846 






665,846 


CIVIL DEFENSE 










O&M, Civil Defense _. 


64,066 






64,066 




42,700 






42,700 


Civ. Def. 

Total Civil Defense 


106,766 






106,760 


Total Mil, Functions _ _ 


46,928,935 


1,700,000 863,621 


12,346,719 


61,838,175 


MILITARY ASSISTANCE 










Military Ass't., Executive 


1,470,000 






1,470,000 


TOTAIr DEPT OF DEFENSE 

RECAPITULATION 
Army -. 


48,398,935 

11,241,644 


1,700,000 863,521 
569,100 262,000 


12,346,719 
6,002,596 


63,308,176 
17,076,330 




14,268,960 


649,600 265,254 


3,309,670 


18,383,484 




17,842,766 


581,300 260,900 


3,791,686 


22,476,651 




3,468,799 


85,367 


241,769 


3,796,936 




106,766 






10G,76& 


Military Assistance _ 


1,470,000 






1,470,000 


TOTAL 


48,398,935 


1,700,000 863,521 


12,345,719 


63,308,175 









Defense 


Industry Bullell 



Supplumtmlt.l Roqunsr 
(IN TltdPSANtiS) 



Ali.-uifl 

A i ttiy 

\m v ( t MMI in,. ( ,.) j. 

Ah I,.,,,- 

Munlli-n 

! Aiinv 

i";l'. 




of Fund, for Alrf, MU,I| B| . Ship, and Tra.k.d Combat V.hlcl, 
FY 1966 Supplrth^nlnl p f oeurmn Proprom 



VIl.MllH 

lll'ICK) 



1 V u 



' I 1 ii-.h - 



N;!.'., iii 111 

V.'IH,!UH! 



1-17:1,1110 



( 



JI TOTAL 



l.-I^.TOt* 



Table 7 
Amounts Requested for RDT&E Authorization in FY 1966 Supplemental Request 

(IN THOUSANDS) 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, 



AND EVALUATION 


FY 196G 


FY 19GC l-'Y 1 




$1,406,400 


$1,400,400 $ av,' 




1,439,200 


1,439,200 1.:!,. 




3,103,900 


3,103,900 71; 




495,000 


495,000 


Emergency Fund - .- -. 


n/a 


125,000 


Total 


$fi,444,500 


$6,569,1500 









Subcontracting Spreads Dollar 

(Continued from Page 19) 

For example, Bohr Corp. of Chula 
Vista, Calif,, largest C-141 subcon- 
tractor, sublets 49 percent of its con- 
tract on engine nacelles. Companies 
receiving this 49 percent from Rohr, in 
turn sublet 40 percent of their part 
to other firms, Ilohr's subcontractors 
at the time the study was made 
totaled $85.9 million; since then addi- 
tional millions are being negotiated 
for follow-on C-141's. 

The defense dollar that goes from 
Lockheed in Georgia to General Dy- 
namics/ Convair in San Diego, Calif., 
another major subcontractor, drifts 
downward through four levels. Con- 
vaii 1 builds the empennage for the 
Starlifter. At the time of the study, 
Convair's subcontract amounted to 
$43.2 million and negotiations are 
under way for follow-on C-Hl's. 
Convair sublet 25 percent, Recipients 
of this portion, in turn, sublet 20 per- 
cent to others. The third group oC 
companies sublet 10 percent. 

Before the C-141 program began in 
1961, prime contractors subcontracted 
about one-third of their program re- 
ceived from the Defense Department. 
Lockheed-Georgia sublet 36 percent 
of the C-130 aircraft program. On 
the C-141 program, however, Lock- 
heed established a record by sublet- 
ting approximately 62 percent. 

The Defense Department encour- 
ages this type of dollar sharing. So, 
when the C-6A competition came 
along, Lockheed proposed subcontract- 
ing the same amount, Douglas and 
Booing, competing for the C-5A, like- 

42 



wise offered tremendous subcontract- 
ing programs. 

Within the next few months, firms 
all over America will be building parts 
and systems of the C-5A to send to 
Marietta, Ga., for assembly with the 
in-house-built pieces into the world's 
biggest airplane. Defense dollars al- 
ready arc being spent throughout the 
nation to obtain raw material for pro- 
duction. 

Changes In Army Aviation Program 

(Continued from Page 2-O 
Army divisions gave us a capability 
which no other Army in the world 
possesses. 

On July 3 the llth Air Assault Di- 
vision was officially designated the 
1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) at 
Fort Benning, Ga. For the first time 
in 22 years the colors of the 1st Cav- 
alry were in the United States; but 
they were not to remain here long. 
In view of the requirement for ad- 
ditional U.S. forces in Vietnam, it 
was only logical that the 1st Air 
Cavalry Division be considered for 
deployment. After intensified training, 
the division deployed to Vietnam, ar- 
riving in mid-September. 

The tempo of activities of the 1st 
Cavalry Division can be expected to 
increase sharply in the next few 
months, I would, however, like to 
sound a word of caution. The divi- 
sion has received much attention and 
has perhaps gotten too great a build- 
up as to what can be expected of it. 
This could lead to disappointment. 
We expect tht division to pull its 
weight in the Republic of Vietnam, 
but no one division is going to clean 
up that messy war and we should 
not look for miracles, 



Tho FDL Ship Propel 

(Continued from 



t'> > 



tition by the prime contnu'l* ** 
such team members during t'i-' fl 
phases of source selection for 1 1 1 ' *-'' 
package contract. 

The major in-house efVucld <"- S"* 1 
in this area are a shift in ***' ' : 
emphasis and provision for iniM"* 
duatvy input into the cnulnift "I 1 ' 
tion process, The plunmiit U;H- ** * 
performance requirement!! ami t-'l*' 
ards, instead of detailed iiliip fi lt 
cations, is intended to elidl liul**--' 
maximum ingenuity and cnnUi* * * 
inventiveness during this pli'. i 
approach is expected to Kliviifit !**'* 
overall ship design capaltiliti* 1 -'! *a- 
country. 

Figure I relates tho FIH , ' 
Project Office to the Navitl l-Tn 
lishment. Of particular import u MI- - 
this Secretary of the Nuvy<(li*HiKqi 
project is the "unitary" imjii't-i, *,.(' 
office with reporting; rcfl])onmUMu; 
the Secretary of the Nuvy tlti., 
both the Chief of Naval Matfrlul 
the Chief of Naval Opm'iUliHm- 
their respective areas or i'<!ij.uii. 
ity. This unique comblnutlim *f | 
the user and the producer **M),-. 
of the ship procurement M|Uitt tl . 
expected to facilitate the 
of the new procedures I 
scribed to the ship acquisition ^ 
Figure II delineates the PI* I 
Project organization as it now- 
In summary, our goals are i t 
out trial applications of contrt^ 
inition and total package 
ship procurement while 
seaborne rapid deployment 



s i ! 





of SI.OWMNW mid itvi'r 
iviinlnl iIuriiiK ilu> mimilt if .limitary 

Kill: J 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

it. <;. run,,,, HUM ...... f iui,,u i' n |,,| 10 

Ni'W \iifh I'lly, S.l.Stii.t.M.'ll, ; i n, |MMI 
lllinir Vl.,.1'1 ,.< mil,, i, , m ,| m),,,,' ,'..,. 

rliifli, l.i ..... II. Alu n. ill \V ( >t, ilv H i 

ll,-f,.||.,o IViii.,1 ..... 1 ,'lm,, ...... Y(,HT. riill',,. 

iMi'tilii, 

I'lnvlii Mill* llhhlnil (( f Htllllnu ..... IK 

tliiilrli'n, N.sw Yi.di I'iu. HI nil ;i;i 

'''"' ....... ."'''-"i >fn "f ">",.!> nll ,i ;!,. 

limn'.. H.idi, r,,,,|,.,-i,,, ,-, :,- , (),.(,.,,,,, 
Vu.mii.-l .'l.,|,|, ( .|| tVni,.,-. I'Mlf-M,, ),| (1| 
I . M. l,Miiiliiii I'd,, M,,n, v,.,|, i',.. 1 

""i 1 "'. I;H:'.M M . ..... ., ,,,,, ,.,;,;;,;; 

11111 .J" 1 ' 1 ;' 1 V" 1 ' 1 '" ''""i H k ...,.irt.. :, t - 

'""I Hln'lf.'f.l, II. I llpf,-,,,,- I',.,, ...... ,, -,' 



NilllltlPNI Attilrllr CM, Kt,,. ^ III,- | , 
" fl: . lf1 ' ...... ' *'"'. ....... 'K ..{ !.'' ,.n,.n 

|1. f, 1,-r I'. 



1'iivcifl. ,(r..-|, ,,,,u||,., 'IV* II, (,.-... ,- 
nmir| fll'l-l-.-H IVl.l.,. |-h|l n ,)rh.Il!h 

MmuiM MMMI (HI c,.. };,- v-.ii, en 
".'"'Ml'.' IV!,., I,. ...... ,,..,I,,M B ,.! , u . - 

v,. t ,-,l I,, vn, ).,., |..,,|, ..... 1 ,,,.,. ,.,, 

Itti' nnl ,',, B B|, |i,f,.,, 3 , ; t ,.] ;!,., ,,i 

"'' 



- 

"'iff. l'hlU.W ( .t ( u Ml ' 

<-. tiitiM iiituiMH u 



DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



ARMY 



'^V, , . 1 ," r "" '"""Ifonl, (Jonn. $1,002,328. 
' ir f '''""'"t'" f""- Mio OV-1 nlrcrnft. 
imiflll ill I' 1 ' Av '" 11 "" MntoHel Com- 



l. lllt j., mirni-i i 1.1 (m ,| ( ,.;, ,, ,H| U< | (1 j "i; , ','"" 

SSi'i' 1 ' All;'"'' v ti;i ' vf '-'* l '' l ' ri ' M ml" ru.-,";' ! i r >1 |'."; i ,|,l Xl '" iy ' Mlll 'tiKv"'Amont Cont| 

^'muM 1 '!*! '?*-''"'"'*' ''"H'-i. HI, '' ' '"" nl " i{ l |"',1/ l !",J,..," ef t 1 V l ' li1 l ''"fH-, Kfnnrtniort, Tenn. 

n i't i i. i i r 'i** i ""' ^ lll ' hl "'iii"i, Midi s| . inl-i' 1 '!' , '''^I'l'^'K'iM mid jiropcllnnts of 

v,,',V 'i '! ' '/"'' '"ini.il,--i. MirhU, -,.,; i.' ' ' ty '"''; .,hl!;l">cl. Ammunition 

Mi J " ^'""^"'h.' r -i, U'hi,',-,," n iv-ft l "'" li ; l)l >v -'ni'i'lv An-itcy, Jollot, 111. 

i.lV.Mi.i., .. _. ' S-'Vii^m,, "V'V 11 '' 1 "".,''"" l>ovor, Colo, 



.... . li ; i .' v J 

"''li-Vi^' lu v\' ,'!'" """" l ' <t(i "" '"' ill- I.ANIT: 

1 ."" 11 ' "mirn. .vii.iv MI-MI.. r| (UI[ , 



,, or, oo, 

' "":' llliu ' f <" ' 'our motor 



, l ()l . 

I , l ' l ;':"''-i' JM-K.. (Mnnhn, Neb. 
N \i ? ("""Inu-t-.r,,, lnr.. Albuquerque, 

Mum ."(.,''" , Wt>l * " tho Cochiti 
.! ' '' H.M.-.-V,;!,', in,. Kmndc. N .M. 

\i"['l' t ..... ' ' '*'. All.i,|ii,.L. f ,n P , N.M. 
iinHlif.ni ( |i,, |.,^(,iifi,ui. M,,,ni. 52,176.000. 

Hi. iiVu'i'- ...... 7'"" ..... ' 'l-vt'ltiiiraont of 

,'' 1 " 1 ' 1J ""'-''I 1'olHiitlc missile 



, Neodham, 



. 

.i.lvnhln |.:|,. r irh- I'li 

i ', lti ' - 11 "; 11 '''"'''"ii . cnase 

l.-V, j ' < ';!" 1 ' ...... '"' N.-filliiLiii. Armr 

M^IM-IU.,, i ,.,, I. |.',, n Monmouth, 

fin' "^'l'^: 1 ;, 1 .! 1 rri *Jl''l 'ru., Nuw York 
t - 3H..I1MM,,. ,.,(,! i.^^.u^t,^ of 

Iii.li.r4 Aii.iv Apninin.tilMi. I'lm.i, Hapnlioo, 

' 






, 

It tlf 



,.. 



Artl ;r r "- "'"'"L|.l. Conn. 
"' 11 ; lll "f- ^-iviiJ.lv uiHl iHiclclnjr 
"" ll ;'"' hiiHiinnlllnn. Iti- 

^v?:;::;;;. 1 ;-''.!/ 11 IV(i - t 

"ir rmflt "'- rhiiiiii..ii,hiB. SB,- 

"! 1 * i*;^"'My !.,),] nnoklnB 
V" ' 1111 ' ...... iit'lit. Texar- 

i 4 . ..... ^riirriiv '' r ....... i!iiioiit & 

Me.Ul.iH Kl.f Cinititi.ll(ni (.. Wichita 

"',,, 5 '; 'l- 11 *^ .wm.h , uinf,, im nS 

'\ I V V VJ-" I'. M]..,-|, D.KJueen, 
*ii', r.nnlix-'cr Mhi., Tulait (Diln 

*'nrU ri.MMrMrllmi C'i,,. Kiiiilmn City, 
, ,l,V' "t" h - "'."t 11 "ttMllKiillon work 

i u V '^*"" |B| "; >"* "',''"M'i. fioiiw. 

-V'', K..Mliir..r IIJ-.I,. Mil,, tlnnfc Ark 

- i 



. i 
. A ..I w llrlliu lir '. 1 *"- 1 "". Hnrllnff- 

l"t!i.i.i r!i w '-' 1l "" ln '" ...... mi. nock 



,M,l v, 



While Hn.,.1* 
., NM, 



, 

.i..*"' 1 '^'' KK!wr 

N " 

(*,, Hflltna. "IV. (3 rJ I ftfia 
k. <u ,A AUI 1 Bit. lull**; Arinv 

If. .ft I,., f ^^HitK,,], (.-.'1-1 MoiMlKHifh. 



. 

N.J, 



. l 

A ii,i,. \ 1 - 

rttini MNIU< t uinniMiL tin i 

[;;<" Krwiriff r,. m.' I-.M,!,. a.ao' 

U'' .^ I M"""' 1 ",',', 1 ""'' "l'"t*'hlH. 'It. 

I; '.I*. fMiil MMIHH ,,,, attul , J t)W n Armv 
Wrm-MH, (;,.,!. ,[,..!, ,',, J l ' Aimy 

h n"'.. ltt r. l " liM ( '- ", Ohio. 

nn. ' 



-- . 

''' 



tilwltal AHHiKklen, (liiklnmJ l'||f *0 285 

&RpV-JS5'*'^ lfl A. K rr^ l tis 
S^^E'% ! '-"'sS 

H.^.J N. _.'. t ' f , y ' 1 ' '\firk _<in (ho Red 



lt,0M < 



'. t 



. 

***** 



, 111 

iivi rw I'n-Jwf, fKlrn urn} 
.III KfiB^^r iiui.. m. l^mh. 
('* Kniiiax CUt, Uo. 
Hlrn nmfl'H'^l . Army 
nJ, FV-M MitmUlh. 

P(t, iJ '- 
t,, t 



.. 

, 
Hlvrr. 







. 
Cttmmiintl. 



Aluminum Cuu^.mtr nf ,\mM.'. rtn i l.,, r i,| rt . .. .. , 

i.iifuti. i-n. sm.r.vu./M. AiuiiuiKini ML,! MiT*'iMt P. nf lt V , "' '"" 1I '' 1 ''"' 

I>..tu-iil<i (i.r .'IfJAli l:\l-, I ni tl t '.! Al, .,n. .:' AitlMiit,, \ VI '"'"' Nrw '"'il'r. 

fchS::..,;; 1 ;;! 1 ^ |lmlB '"''"-'"''-'''': i;:' 1 ':-"^ VUH,,,, A K^i^rri,,. ,-. ' 



ITT <<""" <-n>., i.,, A,,^.,, ..,^, 

"'"! l ' n " li "' (1 ...... ' '"'ii.-u., u.,; ( ,;,. 

nlr ...... ,.l n.iUn.ll..,! Inn.Unu ..vr^-.nr,, 

',""' A""' 1 '''"' Ul ' l * 1 ""< 1 < ; l'v Air MulrrM 



,, 

In I l'"i n>l I in. 1 n. if( l - a i lt nl if:.i,i 
N W *, Avion,,,, i,,,,,,.!* nm.c. H.i) n .Mi.(,| n 
'""'';'"">'. '"'"'".'"I" ".''. 

run i'i i 1 !",. r ,,r"' ,'. "" r ";r '""- 
1 1 .Hit 1 1. II niMsllr I ,. > in , j,, ;;,,,,., 

'"' 1 ' 1 '''""' ''" ..... '''""'''D. i'" 

H."-"!/;,,., 1 ,;;; " l ;.v, 1 ;" 1 ,!""' I'' ; 1 ""; 

-'' " ''" 



All. ran. I'toii /i Wf.Mi.f, Mi, 
iiil-i.l I',, (1 i, JU.M'f C 1 ! II '.-. 
(,.. (t.>- At, 1 ,., ,- 1 n .,i Mo.ii, 1% ! 
,f ,'in.ol U I-.-,. .,,,= 



1(rrr ,,., , , 

!:::;;:; ' '-"<-..-;";: "^ ? ;?,.:^:I,E'^',!:;,;:;,,.. ..... . 



i-.,.,,,,.! , , , i MINI 1 1 I.MAN 

- '''' 1 " 1 """ 1 " A " ll "'"' 



...... . nHHlH r n ,l. ,.-., At I". I.I,),, 

l.'iutfll M,,l.,r,. hMlhtdt,!,,,!!:,, |,,,l II. I. Mi 

ni".i .!*i"'t' "' " "' ' r ''' " i "'" 1 ' 1 '"'"!' 

'.'"V"'" 1 :i ;"'' 1!11) '"' lAt.'iCi. Wilulil 



II, .Mm. AI-'H Hi. 

m*wC Wnrnc, <W,,.. I'M.,,,,,,, (I ..... '.< ..... 
' " ' 



,"! Ct :"!, l .,'' F ' '''''' '"'" I'"" 1 'Mil, f'nll' 

.11 i.C. 1 ; 1 , t'riiiliii'ttun t,( ull.'infl i,|',l 
1111 " I-"tiiJ Hrnch. i 'nlir, Minlni Ail 



,., 



. 








,. . . , . 

I' A.iiv.M, i. ,* <!, ,, s , ,. 

5,. ;:*",:::.'.;.,.; ^:vj 
M:,' - ....... >,. 

It "- r- . ^ ,,,,,:. . , ,1 , 
"'-i -.-* IMIVS-*.V, , ,,. 

r i' -''-"^ i,'."! ' ' '" ' 11 

,;,,;'~\ , 

ll*lllll* I ('.(< (>!('. , t - ,1( 



<* 



i i , , ,1 , 

i, 

* 



*Hmrlnl hull ..... , C,.l, 
,,.....,. n^.nii,,,,'..! ,1, 



AIM 

AlR 



MI*. 



. I'l't 111 121 . 



POSTAGE AND FEES PAID 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 
WASHINGTON, D. C. Z03O1 



OFFICIAL. BUSINESS 




Six New Members Join 
Defense Industry Advisory Council 

Secretary of Defense Cyrus R. Vance, Chairman of the 



in 



members and fill two vacancies. 
The new appointees are; 

Fred J. Borch, President, General Electric Co., 

Ke^mit^ordo^ ^ice President, Brooking Institution, 
Da^iefj"llaughton,' President, Lockheed Aircraft Corp, 



, President, Newport News Shipbuilding- ft 
Dry Dock Co., Newport News, Va. 
Roger Lewis, President, General Dynamics Corp., 

NoeKB. McLean, Chairman of the Board, EDO Corp., 

College Point, N. Y. 

The council was established in May 1962, and has provided a 
forum for discussions by the Secretary of Defense and his principal 
assistants with leaders selected from private economy. 

The six new members were appointed under a rotation policy 
wide range of participation airi wr*^ 
the council small enough to be workable. 

Members of the council who are retiring are: 
Elton D. Carter, Consultant, Glen Burme.Md 

Charles E. Hastings, President, Hastings-Raydist, Inc., 

Hampton, Va, _ 

J. Ed Warren, President, Cities Service Co., 

New York, N. Y. 
Major General James McCormaek, USAF (Ret.), 

Chairman of the Board and Chiet Executive 

Officer, COMSAT Corp., Washington, D, G. 



One of the objectives of the 
Classification Management Pro- 
gram of the Department of De- 
fense is to avoid and eliminate 
overlapping and inconsistent ; 
classification guidance issued to ' 
defense contractors by two or 
more user agencies. 

Classification guidance issued 
by any single user agency to all 
of its own contractors may te 
consistent within that agency 
but at the same time may be in 
conflict with guidance to those 
same contractors issued by one 
or more other user agencies. 

Therefore, it is essential thai 
contractors faced with classifi- 
cation problems resulting froir 
conflicting instructions prom.pt> 
ly bring them to the attentioi 
of the user agencies concern" 
Concurrent notice to the I?* 
reotorate for Contract Admin is 
tration of the Defense SupP*. 
Agency, and to the Director*** 
for Classification Managemen- 
Office of the Assistant Secret** 
of Defense (Administration) \, ^ 
suggested -as a helpful method 
handling such problems. 



Volume 2 No 3 



March 1966 




ISSISTANT SECRETARY 

lEWfrPUBLIC AFFAIRS 




IN THIS ISSUE 

Defense Budget Highlights 

Approach to the FY 1967-71 Program and the FY 1966-67 Budget 

Strategic Offensive and Defensive Forces 

General Purpose Forces 

Airlift and Sealift Forces 

Research and Development 

DEPARTMENTS 

About People 

From the Speakers Rostrum 

Speakers Calendar 

Calendar of Events 

Meetings and Symposia 

Defense Procurement 







Tanks, ships, aircraft, missiles, combat vehicles, small arms, nmmunitj 
communications and electronics equipment, battlefield gear, and jungle bo 
are some of the items which will he funded by the FY 19G7 budget npu 
priation. 

This issue of the DEFENSE INDUSTRY BULLETIN is devoted aim 
entirely to Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara's Statement bcCon 
joint session of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate S 
committee on Department of Defense Appropriations on the Fiscal Yi 
1967-71 Defense Program and 1967 Defense Budget. 

While apace limitations permit only an abbreviated treatment of the sta 
mcnt, an attempt lias been made to excerpt those portions which are 
special interest to defense industry. 

We hope tins presentation of the annual posture statement will con t rib 
to a more complete understanding by industry of the nation's defense nc< 

The Editors. 



Eight new members have been appointed to the Defense Science 
Board the senior technical advisory body m the Defense Depait- 
rnent It is composed of members appointed from civilian life 
and of members representing major Federal agencies. 

The new members selected are: 

Dr. Daniel Alpert, Dean of the Graduate College, University of 
Illinois, and a former member of the board. 

Dr. Alexander Bravelas, Department of Psychology, Stanford 



. Fubini, Vice President, IBM Corp., and former 
Assistant Secretary of Defense , 

Dr. Richard L. Garwin, Director of Applied Research, 1. J. Wat- 
son Research Center. 

Dr. Richard Latter, Rand Corp. . 

Dr. Thomas C. Schelling, Center for International Affairs, Hai- 

vard University. . , , 

Dr. Leonard S. Sheingold, Vice President for Advanced Tech- 
nology, Sylvania Electronic Systems, and former Chief Scien- 
tist for the Air Force. _ . . 

Dr Robert L. Sproull, Vice President for Academic Affairs, 
Cornell University, and former Director of the Advanced Re- 
search Projects Agency. . 

In addition, the following have become members ex officio o 

Dr. Harold M. Agnew, Chairman, Army Scientific Advisory 

Panel. ,,..,, ^ L- ^ 

Dr. Robert C. Seamans, Jr., Deputy Administrator, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration. 
Mr. Garrison Norton, Chairman, Naval Research Advisory 

Committee. 

The Defense Science Board advises the Secretary of Defense, 
through the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, on 
scientific and technical matters of interest to the Defense Depart- 
ment. 



Effectiveness Conference 

The Navy's second Systems Effectiveness Conference (SPECON 
2) will be held April 21-22 in the State Department's West Audi- 
torium in Washington, D.C. 

The conference is being sponsored by the Systems Performance 
Effectiveness Steering Committee of the Naval Material Support 
Establishment as a progress report to Government and industry 
on the development of both technology and management techniques. 

Conference sessions will cover : requirements for increased man- 
agement attention and effect of these requirements on both the 
Navy and industry; analytical techniques and methodologies for 
predicting, measuring and demonstrating systems effectiveness; 
and case history results from concept formulation and contract 
definition through development as regards systems effectiveness 
requirements upon project performance. 

The first Systems Performance Effectiveness Conference, held 
last April, was limited to Navy civilian and military personnel 
with a few special guests. Based on the success of the first SPE- 
CON and to provide a progress report on systems performance 
efforts of the past year, both Government and industry represen- 
tatives have been invited this year. 

For information and program agenda contact; Mr, G. W. Neu- 
man, Executive Secretary, SPE Steering Committee, Bureau of 
Ships, Code 361B, Washington, D.C. 20360. 




Published by the Department 
of Defense 

Hon. Robert S. McNamara 

Secretary of Defense 

Hon. Cyrus R. Vance 

Deputy Secretary of Defense 

Hon. Arthur Sylvester 

Assistant Secretary of Defense 
(Public Affairs) 

Col. ,T. H. CroHS, USAF 

Director for Community Relations 

Col. Edwin C. Gibson, USA 

Chief, Business & Labor Division 



Editor LCdr. E. W. Bradford, USN 

Assoc. Editor Mies Cecilia Pollok 

Assoc. Editor Mr. Kick La Pake 

Editorial Assistant 

Norman E. Worra, J01, USN 



The Defense Industry Ilullctin 
is published monthly by the Business 
& Labor Division, Directorate 'for 
Community Eolations, Office of the 
Assistant Secretary of DeTonso (Pub- 
lic Affairs). Use of funds for printing 
this publication was approved by the 
Director of tho Bureau of the Budget, 

The purpose of the Bulletin _ is 
to serve as a means of communication 
between the Department of Defense 
(DOD) and its authorized agencies 
and defense contractors and other 
business interests. It will serve as 
a guide to industry concerning offi- 
cial policies, programs and projects, 
and will seek to stimulate thought by 
members of the defense-industry team 
in solving the problems that may arise 
in fulfilling the requirements of tho 
DOD. 

Material in the Bulletin is se- 
lected to supply pertinent unclassified 
data of interest to the business com- 
munity. Suggestions from industry 
representatives for topics to bo cov- 
ered in future issues should be for- 
warded to the Business & Labor 
Division. 

The Bulletin is distributed without 
charge each month to representatives 
of industry and to agencies of tho De- 
partment of Defense, Army, Navy and 
Air Force, Request's for copies should 
be addressed to the Business & Labor 
Division, OASD(PA), Room 2E813, 
The Pentagon, Washington, D.C, 
20301, telephone, OXford 5-2709. 

Contents of the magazine may _ be 
reprinted freely without requesting 
permission. Mention of the source will 
be appreciated. 




[Following the method established 
last year in excerpting the FY 19G6 
budget statement in the DEFENSE 
INDUSTRY BULLETIN, paragraph 
markings have been deleted from the 
original text of the Secretary of De- 
fense's posture statement for the sake 
of clarity. In addition some subheads 
have been added to assist the reader 
in locating individual programs and 
subjects.'] 

As I have noted in previous appear- 
ances before this committee, Presi- 
dent Kennedy gave me two general 
instructions when I toolc office in Jan- 
uary 1961: 

Develop the military force struc- 
ture necessary to support our foreign 
policy without regard to arbitrary 
budget ceilings. 

Procure find operate this force !it 
the lowest possible cost. 

During the entire five years of my 
tenure as Secretary of Defense, I 
have boon guided by these two basic 
principles. Throughout that period I 
have insisted that our military strate- 
gy and plans should be related to the 
threat, that the forces to be acquired 
and maintained should be related to 
the strategy and the plans, and that 
the forces should be adequately sup- 
ported, not only with men, equipment 
and facilities needed in peacetime, but 
with war reserve (stocks as well, so 
that they could engage in combat for 
sustained periods of time. 

The achievement of this objective 
has not been easy. For many years 
our military plans far exceeded the 
forces available to support them, and 
even the forces available wore not in 
proper balance with one another. 
There was not enough tactical air 
power to support the existing num- 
ber of Army divisions. In addition, al- 
though the concept of a mobile central 
reserve had been generally accepted, 
the airlift required to move these 
Forces was completely inadequate, and 
ihere was not enough amphibious lift 
;o move the Marine Corps forces. Al- 
though a great deal of attention had 
Jccn paid to nuclear weapons, stocks 
rf ammunition and other combat con- 
sumables required for non-nuclear 
var were grossly deficient in many 
iategorioa. 

Since I960, we have added some $50 
mhon to our defense program to cor- 

)efense Industry Bulletin 



rect these deficiencies. By the end of 

FY 1965 we had achieved a: 

45 percent increase in the num- 
ber of combat-ready Army divisions. 

40 percent increase in the num- 
ber of combat helicopters. 

100 percent increase in airlift ca- 
pability. 

51 percent increase in the num- 
ber of Air Force fighter squadrons. 

" 100 percent increase in naval 
ship construction to modernize our 
fleet. 

| 1,000 percent increase in the Spe- 
cial Forces trained for counterinsur- 
gency. 

At the same time, we did not ne- 
glect our nuclear forces. Indeed, dur- 
ing this period we achieved a; 

200 percent increase in the num- 
ber of nuclear warheads and total 
mcgatonnage in the strategic alert 
forces. 

67 percent increase in the num- 
ber of tactical nuclear weapons in 
Western Europe. 

But even while these increases in 
our military strength were being 
achieved, we moved forward vigorous- 
ly on President Kennedy's second in- 



struction, "Procure and operate this 
force at the lowest possible cost." 

Each year since its inauguration in 
FY 1961, we have been able to in- 
crease the savings actually realized 
through our Cost Reduction Program 
and to increase its goals. In FY 1965, 
the last completed fiscal year, savings 
amounted to about $4.8 billion com- 
pared with $2.8 billion in FY 1964 
and $1.4 billion in 1963. I can assure 
you that these savings were made 
without adverse effect on our military 
Strength or combat readiness. Any 
doubt of this can only be based on a 
misunderstanding of the way in which 
we compute our requirements for 
forces, equipment and ammunition. As 
noted earlier, it has been my conten- 
tion from the very beginning that we 
should first determine as accurately 
as possible what we need to support 
the forces required by our war plans; 
and then buy all of what we need, but 
only what we need, and buy at the 
lowest sound price. 

In the case of both major equip- 
ment and consumables, we must ac- 
quire the items needed for the initial 
outfitting of the forces and for keep- 
ing their equipment modern, plus suf- 
ficient stocks to meet our peacetime 
needs, plus a war reserve Sufficient to 




Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara. 



meet the logistic standards associated 
with our contingency war plans. All 
of these requirements are susceptible 
to calculation and there is nothing to 
bo gained by buying more than we 
need at any particular time. Indeed, 
there is much to be lost since nearly 
all of those stocks are subject to obso- 
lescence and many items actually de- 
teriorate physically over time. Even 
under the best of circumstances, we 
have to dispose of billions of dollars 
of equipment and supplies each year, 
and at a mere fraction of their orig- 
inal cost. To the extent wo buy more 
than we need, we simply increase the 
amount which eventually must be dis- 
posed of, thus wasting the taxpayers' 
money without adding anything of 
value to our actual military strength. 

But the question still remains: 
Why, if we had acquired what we 
needed, do we have to increase our 
procurement so substantially in order 
to support our military effort in 
Southeast Asia? The answer to this 
question has three parts. First, we 
are increasing the sixc of our active 
forces because we do not wish at this 
time to call up the reserve forces. 
The now forces must be equipped and 
supplied. 

Second, we do not normally provide 
in advance for combat attrition of 
such major weapon systems as air- 
craft and ghips because of the great 
cost involved. I understand that a war 
reserve of aircraft was once consid- 
ered in connection with the military 
buildup undertaken during the Ko- 
rean War, but rejected for the same 
reason. Accordingly, additional air- 
craft must be procured as soon as the 
forces arc committed to combat, and 
this was one of the largest items in 
our FY 1966 supplemental request. 



Third, we provide in our war re- 
serve stocks only those quantities of 
combat consumables needed to tide us 
over until additional stocks can be ac- 
quired from new production. This 
means that as soon as we start to con- 
sume significant quantities of war 
reserve stocks in combat, we must 
start to procure replacement stocks. 
For such Horns as ammunition, war- 
time consumption rates are many 
times peacetime rates. You will see 
when I discuss our ammunition re- 
quirements later In the statement, 
that it would be entirely impractical 
to attempt to carry in stock the lingo 
amounts required when our forces 
actually engage in combat. And, there 
is no need to do so, as long as we have 
on hand the essential margin between 
consumption and production. This 
margin we have, except in those few 
cases whore materiel is being used in 
Vietnam in ways and quantities which 
were never anticipated; for example, 
the 2.70 inch rocket now being fired 
in grout quantities from helicopters. 

This is not to say that every one 
of the tens of thousands of 'Defense 
Department Supply points is without 
a single "inventory shortage." Any- 
one who has had experience with 
large supply systems knows that 
somewhere, something will be lacking. 
No matter how much we spend for 
defense, someone somewhere in our 
Tar (lung organisation will bo short 
some item at any particular time, This 
1ms nothing to do with tho amount 
of funds requested and appropriated. 
Tt simply reflects the fact that no sys- 
tem involving literally hundreds of 
thousands of people and millions of 
different items spread around this 
gloho can be one hundred percent per- 
fect. Mistakes in distribution or ro- 




- WWi 1MW 



U.S. Marines storm ashore near Da Niuig. 



quircmcnts calculations will lie m 
and theso mistakes will be reflcctc 
an inventory Klioi-tuge, or over 
somewhere in this system. This is ' 
of private industry as well as Ciov 
ment, and it is up In managemen 
all levels to see to it that these i 
takes are held to a minimum and 
roc ted promptly wlum discovered. 
Accordingly, the entire quoiitioi 
shortages must be viuwed in pers 
live. The acid test of our lti(;if 
system is the ability of our force 
hike tin; Hold and engage ' com 
I submit that the ruiml cloployn 
and support in comlmi of a fora 
over one-quarter of n million men 
eluding tlio.se almm-d shi|)H off 
coast of Vietnam) to an area 10 
miles from our shores clearly den 
strains that our logistic system 
that capability. Nevuv before has 
country been able to Hold and sup| 
in combat so largo a force in .so si 
a time over so great i\ distance, \v 
out calling up tin 1 reserve ami wit! 
applying price, WKRV and male 
controls to our civilian economy. 1 
in why General A brains, the ' 
Chief of Stall' of tin; Army, was 
to say hint Juno: 

"The Army is in the best iH'iu 
time condition in its history, 
make thin statement bused on n 
experience as n battalion coi 
niander in Kui'ope for 22 inontl 
beginning in I it'll*, mid as COT 
ivmmlor of tin armored cuvnl 
rogimont for M months Urn 
lifter, us u division commander 
Kuropi! from Oclolmi' HXiOloJu 
lltlia, anil as corps command 
from July HIM to July li)fl 
From this background mid fro 
my association with soldiers jn 
thcii- equipment, T can ntU: u 
equivocally that the rwulJnc 
conditions in the U.S. Army a 
the highlit that have been n 
tnined in my a 1 .) yurn of Hwvtcc 

That is why th Kecnilnry 
Chief of Stall' of thu Army were 
to report lust AuguHt that: 

"Th<! Army was never in a be 
tor position in peacetime Uimi 
is today 'With rcHpcut to bo 1 
training and equipment, it is ful 
prepared to carry out its missii 
of miHtuinod land combat, Fro 
thu point of view of materiel, tli 
is tlu; direct result of the sign! 
cant equipment procurement ai 
modernisation proKnmi that h 
taken place over the past sever 
years, and the provision of coi 
bat reserves in depth to cnal 
our forces to engage 1 in sustain' 
combat." 

That is why General Wheeler, 
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of S 



March 1 



was able to say last year about forces 
.frmy in Europe: 

"F have never known, historic- 
ally or otherwise, of any Army in 
peacetime as well equipped, as 
well trained, as well manned as 
the Seventh Army today." 

With regard to the preparation of 
the FY 19(57-71 program and the FY 
1966 supplemental and the FY 1067 
budget, we have had to make a some- 
what arbitrary assumption regarding 
the duration of the conflict in South- 
east Asia. Since we have no way of 
knowing how long it will actually last, 
or how it will evolve, we have budgct- 
cd for combat opt; rations through the 
^ end of June 19(>7. This means that if 
it later appears that the conflict will 
continue beyond that date, or if it 
should expand beyond the level as- 
sumed in our present plans, we will 
come back to the Congress with an 
additional FY 1%7 request. If the 
conflict should end bet'ore that date or 
if rates of consumption are less than 
planned, we would, of course, have to 
adjust the programs downward. In 
either case, further changes in the FY 
1 9(57-71 program and this FY I()fi7 
budget may occur. 

This .situation is not unlike that 
j which existed four years ago when I 
appeared here in support of the FY 
li)(iS-07 program and the FY 196;! 
budget. At that time we wen; uncer- 
tain as to how the Berlin crisis would 
evolve and we assumed for budget 
purposes that the special measures as- 
sociated with that crisis would termi- 
nate at the beginning of the next fis- 
cal year. During most of the Korean 
War, it was assumed for budget pur- 
poses that the conflict would end be- 
fore the beginning of the next fiscal 
year. And, when President Eisenhow- 
er in early lilfiJl extended this assump- 
tion to include the next fiscal year 
(FY 19.54), the conflict ended in' the 
' first month of that year. So it is clear 
there is no "right" way to deal with 
this kind of problem. The essential 
point is that the planning assump- 
tions underlying the FY l!)<}6-<>7 
budget requests .should be clearly un- 
derstood by all concerned. 

Because of the largo demands of 
our planned military operations in 
Southeast Asia, wo have stretched out 
and deferred some programs which 
are not directly related to our near- 
term combat readiness. This is partic- 
ularly true of the non-combat portion 
of the military construction program, 
(. e.g., the replacement of administra- 
tion and school buildings, BOQ's, bar- 
racks, etc,, not related to the support 
of our military operations in South- 
east Asia. It is also true of the Fam- 



ily Housing construction program, 
where we have deferred the 8,500 
units funded in FY 1966 for the time 
being and have not included any fur- 
ther request for new units in the FY 
1967 budget. As you know, I have 
fought very hard for adequate mili- 
tary family housing-, and this stretch- 
out should not be construed as a loss 
of interest on my part. It is simply 
the kind of program that can be de- 
ferred without adversely affecting our 
near-term combat readiness. 

Needless to say, we are pursuing our 
Cost Reduction Program with re- 
newed vigor. And, as you know, we 
have developed another list of base 
closings and consolidations. These 
actions have been very carefully re- 
viewed by each of the Military De- 
partments in the light of our require- 
ments in Southeast Asia. They will in 
no way affect our combat capabilities 
in Southeast Asia or elsewhere. 

By eliminating unncedctl and mar- 
ginal activities and deferring what- 
ever can be safely deferred, I have 
been able to reduce the FY 19fifi sup- 
plemental and FY 1967 budget re- 
quests of the Services and Defense 
Agencies by about $1 !")'/> billion, while 
at the same time providing for all es- 
sential military requirements. 

We are requesting for FY 1966 a 
total of $GJ!.3 billion in new obliga- 
tional authority, of which $12,3 bil- 
lion is in the Special Supplemental 
for Southeast Asia requirements, and 
$.9 billion is for the pay raises enact- 
ed last year. For FY 1967 we are re- 
questing a total of $59.9 billion in new 
obligational authority. Expenditures 
for these two fiscal years are now esti- 
mated at ?5d.2 billion and $58.3 bil- 
lion, respectively. . . , 

Impact of (he Defense Program on 
the Balance of Payments. 

The persisting deficit in the U.S. in- 
ternational balance of payments and 
the contribution which our defense ex- 
penditures abroad make to that deficit 
continue to be of major concern. In 



CY 19G4 the overall deficit was about 
$2.8 billion, with about $1.3 billion 
occurring in the last quarter of the 
year. However, as a result of the ac- 
tions initiated by the President last 
February, we now expect that when 
final data are available for 1965, they 
will show a substantial improvement 
over 1964. For the first three quarters 
of 19fi5, the deficit ran at an annual 
rate of less than half of the 1964 fig- 
ure. Further progress in reducing the 
deficit is anticipated this year as the 
recently announced, intensified pro- 
gram is implemented. 

In the case of Defense, our objec- 
tive is to reduce the net impact of our 
programs on the balance of payments, 
while maintaining all necessary com- 
bat capabilities and without creating 
undue hardships for the individual 
serviceman or his dependents. As 
shown in the table below, we have 
made substantial progress during- the 
last few years in reducing the deficit 
on the "Defense" account. 

Last year I stated that we hoped to 
reduce further the net adverse bal- 
ance on the "Defense" account to an 
annual rate of about $1,4 billion. De- 
spite increased overseas military ex- 
penditures associated with activities 
in Southeast Asia during the last half 
of the year, we were able to achieve 
that goal in FY lOfiB. The reduction 
since 1961 stems principally from in- 
creased receipts from military sales 
a direct result of a greatly intensified 
effort in this area. During this period 
Defense foreign exchange expendi- 
tures were held relatively constant in 
spite of substantial wage and price 
increases overseas. For example, be- 

t.WOOIl 1'lftl rtiwl 10ft,l , ln,,lt. ! 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



the cost of our deployments overseas 
between FY 19G1 and 19CG these 
and other increases would have added 
about a half a billion dollars to our 
expenditures had they not been offset 
by such actions as the following: 

U.S.-prodiK;cd supplies and serv- 
ices arc generally favored whenever 
their cost, including transportation 
and handling-, does not exceed the cost 
of foreign goods by more than. 50 per- 
cent. Through FY 1965, about $200 
million of such procurement wa.s di- 
verted to U.S. sources. 

Offshore procurement for the 
Military Assistance Program is gener- 
ally limited to the fulfillment of com- 
mitments made in prior years. In FY 
10fi5, foreign purchases of major 
items for MAP were approximately 
?f>6 million, little more than half the 
PY 1964 figure. 

In FY 19(54 and FY 1965 we re- 
duced the number of foreign nationals 
employed by the Department of De- 
fense by approximately 35,000, about 
a 15 percent reduction during the two 
years. The staffs of U.S. military 
headquarters overseas were also re- 
duced about 15 percent. 

We are adjusting our forces de- 
ployed abroad to changes in our own 
military capabilities and those of our 
allies, whenever possible. For exam- 
ple, during FY 19fi4 and 19G5, we 
completed the phase out of the B-47 
bomber force in Europe and the 
transfer of certain air defense respon- 
sibilities to the forces of Spain and 
Japan. 

We have eliminated all but the 
most essential overseas construction 



from our programs and are reducing 
the foreign exchange cost of those 
approved projects by requiring the 
use of U.S. construction contractors, 
U.S. flag carriers and U.S.-produced 
materials whenever practicable. 

We are closely scrutinizing the 
requirement for all existing overseas 
bases and facilities and are attempting 
through consolidation and inactivation 
to reduce their costs to a minimum. . . . 

We also are making an intensified 
effort to maintain and, if possible, in- 
crease the level of receipts from mili- 
tary sales. Since the end of FY 1961, 
orders, commitments and options for 
over $9 billion of U.S. military equip- 
ment and services have been obtained. 
In addition to their balance of pay- 
ments benefits, these sales make a 
positive contribution to the overall de- 
fense posture of the Free World by 
providing our allies with modern 
equipment at a cost far less than it 
would cost them to develop and pro- 
duce it themselves. Moreover, these 
sales add to our own economic well- 
being. For example, they will provide 
almost $1 billion in profits to U.S. in- 
dustry and over one million man- 
years of work to American labor. 

Purchases by the Federal Republic 
of Germany under its military offset 
agreement remain the most significant 
in terms of total dollar amount. Dur- 
ing the past year, however, we have 
consummated several other significant 
sales, most notably with Australia, 
Italy and the United Kingdom. Aus- 
tralia will purchase about $350 mil- 
lion worth of U.S. military goods and 
Cervices over the next three years in- 
cluding C-130's, P-8's and S-2E's. 




U.S. Air Force F-4C Aircraft. 



Last December, arrangements 'also 
were completed with Italy for the co- 
production and purchase of about 200 
million of military equipment, includ- 
ing the all-weather F-104 aircraft. 
The United Kingdom during FY 1955 
signed orders for nearly $500 million 
of U.S. equipment, including- C-130 
transports and F-4 fighter nil-cm ft, 
In addition, the U.K. took options on 
additional F-4 and F-lll aircraft. 

Recause of the size of its potential 
military procurements from the 
United States and their balance of 
payments affects, the United King- 
dom has asked us to search out the 
types of military equipment we plan 
to buy for which British firms might 
compete. This would enable them la- 
cam a part of the dollar exchange 
needed for their possible F-11L pro- 
curement from the United States. 
Early this year we expect to request 
bids from U.S. and U.K. firms for 11 
small non-combatant ships having a. 
total value in terms of foreign ex- 
change of about $50 million. I think it 
should be clear to all that our future 
ability to negotiate additional sales 
programs will depend, at least in part, 
on our demonstrated willingness to 
make some reciprocal purchases where 
foreign equipment is competitive in 
price, quality and delivery schedules. 

Presently, the outlook for l")ef use- 
related foreign exchange expenditures 
is clouded by the situation in South- 
east Asia. While we are taking- every 
reasonable measure to reduce their 
impact, our increased activities in 
that area will, indeed, result in higher 
balance of payment costs. Our tenta- 
tive estimate is that such costs may 
increase by several hundred million 
dollars in FY 19GG, solely because! of 
Vietnam-related actions. If it were 
not for the measures we are taking, 
these costs could be much higher. For 
example, the bulk of the materials 
and equipment being used in our large 
construction program in Vietnam tiro 
coming from the United States. Also, 
we are increasing substantially the 
number of U.S. military construction 
battalions used for this work. 

This set-back to our effort to re- 
duce foreign exchange expenditures 
makes it even more important to find 
offsetting actions. To this end, we 
have again bolstered our salea effort, 
and I can assure the committee that 
we will continue to scrutinize very 
closely every overseas military activ- 
ity and function which involves ex- 
penditures abroad. 



March 1966 




Included in this section arc the two 
major programs which constitute our 
general nuclear war forces: the 
Strategic Offensive Forces and the 
Strategic Defensive Forces, including 
Civil Defense. Because of the close 
interrelationship and, indeed, the 
interaction of these components of 
our general nuclear war posture, it 
is essential that they be considered 
within a single analytical frame- 
work. Only then can the nature of. 
the genera] nuclear war problem in 
all of its dimensions be fully grasped 
and the relative merits of available 
alternatives be properly evaluated. 

The General Nuclear 
War Problem 

Last year I pointed out that the 
general nuclear war forces should 
have two basic capabilities: 

To deter deliberate nuclear attack 
upon the United States and its allies 
by maintaining, continuously, a highly 
reliable ability to indict an unaccept- 
able degree of damage upon any 
single aggressor, or combination of 
aggressors, at any time during the 
course of a strategic nuclear ex- 
change, even after absorbing a sur- 
prise first .strike. 

In the event such a war never- 
theless occurred, to limit damage to 
the population and industrial capa- 
city. 

The first of these capabilities we 
call t Assured Destruction and the 
second Damage Limitation. . , . 

Strategic Offensive Forces 

The force structure proposed for 
the FY 1907-71 period is shown on 
the classified table, provided to the 

Committee. 

The Maintenance of an Kffcctiva 
Manned Bomber Force in the 1970'a. 

... We propose to phase out the 
B-52C-F's over the next five years 
and the B-58's in FY 1971, (riving 
us a modernized force of 4GB manned 
bombers (210 FB-lllA's and 255 B~ 
B2G-H's) by the end of that fiscal 
year and at loss than the cost which 
would result from maintenance of 
the older B-52's and the B-58's in 
the force. , . . 

Although we still cannot see a 
clear need for a new strategic bomber 
to replace the B~B2G-H's and FB- 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



Ill's, we plan, as a hedge against 
fiome unforeseen improvement in 
Soviet anti-bomber defenses, to con- 
tinue development work on the com- 
ponents and sub-systems which 
would be required if it should ulti- 
mately become desirable to deploy 
such an aircraft. Last year we pro- 
posed a four-part program for an 
advanced manned strategic aircraft 
(AMSA) which included work on 
alternative design approaches, the 
avionics, the propulsion system and 
the short range attack missile, SRAM. 
For the first throe elements of this 
program we envisioned a 19fiG effort 
costing $39 million $24 million from 
prior year funds and $15 million 
from FY 19fifi appropriations. In 
acting on our requests, the Congress 
added $7 million specifying that the 
total of $22 million provided in FY 
19fi(i was to be available for AMSA. 
All of this additional $7 million has 
been applied to the program. Ad- 
vanced development work on the air- 
frame design and propulsion elements 
can he continued in FY 1967 with 
funds already on hand. The avionics 
development will require an additional 
$11 million in FY 19G7. 

Air Launched Missile. 

Last year wo initiated development 
of SHAM as an element of the four 
part AMSA program. Now, given 
the decision to proceed with the pro- 
curement and deployment of the FB- 
lli/SRAM system, this development 
pi'ogram must be reoriented to the 
FH-lll schedule. The cost to com- 
plete- the SHAM development program 
is now estimated at $.1.70 million, in- 
cluding the related B-B2 and FB-111 
avionics. Some $8 million was pro- 
vided in prior years; about $40 mil- 
lion will he needed in FY 1907. 

Although we do not now plan to 



deploy SRAM on the B-62G-H'. 
we propose to undertake the nuccd- 
sary avionics development work to 
permit such a deployment if it should 
become desirable later. We would 
expect to keep the Hound Dog mis- 
siles in the operational inventory 
through FY 1970 on the same sched- 
ule as envisioned a year ago. How- 
ever, in 1971, with the completion 
of the phase out of the B-52C-F'(t, 
the Hound Dog force would bit 
phased down accordingly. We almi 
propose to undertake engincorhuv 
development and test of a new ter- 
minal guidance system for Hound 
Dog which gives promise of achiev- 
ing a better overall system r<ilia - 
bility. Total development cost in 
estimated at $20.5 million of wbicli 
$(1.6 million would he obtained by 
raproff ramming presently available 
funds and $8.1 million is included 
in the FY 1967 budget. . , . 

The cost of the manned bomber 
force we now propose, compared with 
the cost of continuing the current 
forces, is shown in the table Ix-low, 

Strategic Reconnaissance. 

The strategic reconnaissance force 
as shown on the classified tablo is es- 
sentially the same as that projected a 
year ago. All of these aircraft vveiv 
procured in prior years. 

Strategic Missile Forces. 

Qualitative Improvements lo tlic- 

Minn teman Force. . . . Wo a n - 

now making certain further major 
improvements in the Minuttmuui 
which will so increase its perform- 
ances as to warrant a new dcsi^im- 
tion -Minutcman III. The initial pro- 
curement of this missile will bo mitdi- 
in FY 1907. 

We still plan to continue tlit> !H 
Titan tl missiles in the force through- 
out the program period, 

By the cud of the- current fluent 
year, we expect that 32 Folnrm 
submarines (512 missiles) will be op- 



FY 1967 FY 1971 FY 1975 


Current Force Extended 




(Costs in Billions 


of Dollars) 


Forces ( # aircraft) : 








B-52 


600 


600 


600 


B-58 


80 


70 


G4 


Costs (Cumulative '67-) 




$8.6 


$17 


Proposed Bomber Force 








Forces (# aircraft); 








B-52 


600 


255 


2EG 


B-G8 


80 








FB-111 





210 


210 


Costs (Cumulative '67-) 




$8.4 


$14 



erational and, by the end of the 1st 
quarter of FY 1968, the entire 
planned force of 41 submarines (656 
missiles) will be operational. The 
force will then consist of 13 SSBN's 
with A-2 missiles and 28 SSBN's with 
A-3 missiles. All five of the earlier 
A-l boats will have been retrofitted to 
carry the A-3 missile. We also tenta- 
tively plan to modify four of the A-2 
submarines during their first over- 
haul in the FY 1968-69 period to 
carry the A-3 missiles, in order to 
avoid the high unit costs which would 
be involved in restarting the A-2 
missile production line (which closed 
down in June 19G4) when present in- 
ventories are depleted by testing; and 
training programs. 

Accelerated Development of Posei- 
don. ... it appears prudent at this 
time to place ourselves in a position 
to deploy a force of Poseidon missiles 
if this should be required, Last year 
we initiated project definition for this 
missile, using available 1965 funds, 
but the pace of the development was 
not precisely established. Now we pro- 
pose an accelerated engineering de- 
velopment program for the Poseidon 
missile. The total cost of this develop- 
ment is estimated at about $1.3 bil- 
lion, of which about $300 million will 
be needed in FY 1967. No decisions 
need be made now on the number of 
Polaris submarines to be ultimately 
retrofitted with Poseidon. 

With respect to other future strate- 
gic missile systems, both the Air 
Force and the Navy have active study 
programs under way. The Air Force 
will continue work on several projects 
which would contribute to the devel- 
opment of an advanced ICBM, if one 
should be required at some time in the 
future. In total, some $10 million is 
required for FY 1967 for these proj- 
ects. The Navy will conduct an ad- 
vanced development study of im- 
proved propulsion systems for future 
sea-based missiles at a FY 1967 cost 
of $3 million. 

Accelerated Development of Pene- 
tration Aids. ... We have intensively 
studied a wide variety of penetration 
aid techniques and have invested a 
total of about $1.2 billion on research 
and development in this area. We .now 
propose to carry this work forward 
on an accelerated basis, particularly 
with regard to the development of new 
penetration aids, which would be 
needed to defeat an area ABM defense 
employing exoatmospheric missiles. 

Other Strategic Offensive Forces. 

The other strategic forces are es- 
sentially the same aa those pro- 
grammed a year ago. With respect to 
the KC-136's, as the total size of the 



bomber force declines wo intend to 
retain one tanker for each of the 
bombers. Most, if not all, of the re- 
mainder will be used to improve the 
air-to-air refueling capabilities of the 
tactical air forces. However, the spe- 
cific re-allocation of these KC-135's 
will be made as they become available 
for reassignment. 

With respect to the Post At- 
tack Command and Control System 
(PACCS), a number of C-135's have 
been added to the force planned last 
year. These aircraft have previously 
been used principally as refueling 
tankers with a secondary mission as 
communications relay aircraft. In 
1963, anticipating the time when we 
might no longer be sure of the sur- 
vivability of our ground-based missile 
launch control facilities, we undertook 
the development of an airborne 
launch control capability for all of 
the Minuteman force. The develop- 
ment costs of the necessary equipment 
through FY 1967 is estimated at $18.6 
million. We now propose to begin pro- 
curement of the airborne portion of 
this equipment in FY 1966 'at a cost 
of approximately $22 million. The 
ground portion of the airborne launch 
control capability is included as an 
integral element of the Minuteman 
program. 



Strafegic Defensive Forces 

The forces proposed for the FY 
1967-70 period are shown in the clas- 
sified table furnished to the com- 
mittee. 

The Overall Level of the Anti- 
Bomber Defense Program, 

As I have pointed out in previous 
years, the elaborate defenses which 
we erected against the Soviet's bomb- 
er threat during the decade of the 
1950's no longer retain their original 
importance. Today, with no defense 
against the major threat of Soviet 
ICBM's, our anti-bomber defenses 
alone would contribute very little to 
our Damage Limiting objective and 
their residual effectiveness after a 
major ICBM attack is highly proble- 
matical. For this reason we have 
been engaged over the past five years 
in a major restructuring of these 
defenses. 

Surveillance, Warning and Control. 

Beginning in 1961, we have taken a 
number of steps to reorient the sur- 
veillance, warning and control system 
to a nuclear war environment in 
which an early surprise attack by 
ICBM's and SLBM's would be the 
most likely enemy tactic. These steps 
were designed to reduce the vulnera- 



bility of the system to such an attack 
and to bring its operating costs to a 
level more commensurate with the 
manned bomber threat as it has actu- 
ally developed. 

Semi- Automatic Ground Environ- 
ment System (SAGE). Essentially 
soft, the SAGE system in 1961 was 
extremely vulnerable to missile attack. 
To provide immediate help, an interim 
manual backup interceptor control ca- 
pability was established at 27 prime 
radar sites while work was initiated 
on a more effective backup system of 
34 semi-automatic BUIC II 'stations 
co-located with prime radars. . . , 

The first BUIC IPs became opera- 
tional last fall and all 14 of those- now 
planned will be operational by April 
this year. In FY 19G7 wo will begin 
to modify certain of these stations 
to the BUIC IIT configuration, thereby 
causing- a temporary drop to 12 op- 
erational stations at the end of that 
year. By the end of FY 1%8, all BUIC 
IPs will have been converted and by 
end FY 1969, the entire BUIC lit de- 
ployment should be complete. 

Radars. , . . We are continuing our 
program of internetting our radnr 
system with that of the Federal Avln- 
tion Agency. . . , The Defense Depart- 
ment's share of this program is esti- 
mated at $22 million, of which $11 
million was included in the FY i&Ofifi 
budget, leaving $11 million to he pro- 
vided in FY 1967. 

Manned Interceptors, Last year, as 

part of the effort to restructure the 
Strategic Defensive Forces, we initi- 
ated a major phase down o.f the active 
fighter interceptor force, with tlic 
National Guard interceptor force re- 
maining at about the current kivcl 
but being progressively rc-equi|)]icd 
with F-102's retired from the active I 
force. This plan has now been pro- 
jected through FY 1971 with no sig- 
nificant change/ . . . 




Polaris Submarine USS Sam Raybnrn. 



March 196* 



Surface-to-Air Missiles. With the 
exception of the Hercules, the 
surface-to-air missile forces arc es- 
sentially the same as those projected 
a year ago. In the case of Nike- 
Hercules, we have decided to phase 
out 22 batteries deployed in defense 
of soft SAC bomber bases in the 
United States and Greenland. . . . 

Qualitative improvements to the 
Anti-Bomber Defen.se. 

Production and Deployment of a 
New Manned Interceptor. Last year 
I pointed out that the single most im- 
portant decision likely to face ns over 
tho next few years in the anti-bomber 
defense area is the production and de- 
ployment of a force of the advanced 
fighter-interceptor aircraft to replace 
those which we now have. Over the 
last 12 months we have intensively 
studied the desirability of procuring 
a force of F-12 type interceptors for 
the period beyond li)70. Although a 
substantial deployment of these air- 
craft would greatly increase the effec- 
tiveness of our anti-bomber defenses, 
its very great cost (about $fiV& bil- 
lion over tho 1967-71 period) would 
bo justified only if we were to decide 
to seek a very large and effective 
Damage Limiting program, and then 
only if the Soviets were to increase 
their bomber tin-oat in both numbers 
and quality. 

Accordingly, we propose to continue 
tho YF-12A (light test program with 
the three aim-aft now available. Wo 
have allocated $2H million to the YF- 
.I.2A program in the current fiscal 
year, plus $5 million to the F-12 pro- 
gram for certain improvements in the 
ASG-18/AIM-47 fire control and mis- 
silo system. For PY 1907, we are re- 
questing $20 million for the YF-J.2A 
teat program and $10 million for con- 
tinuing the F-12 program. The ASG- 
18/ATM-47 system would be used on 
cither the F-12 or F-lll interceptor, 
I _ believe that with either of these 
aircraft, we could proceed cxpedi- 
tiously with tho deployment of a new 
interceptor later in this decade if that 
should prove necessary, 




U.S. Air Force YF-12A. 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



If we decide to deploy a force of 
advanced interceptors, we would also 
wish to consider the simultaneous de- 
ployment of a highly survivable air- 
borne warning and control system 
(AWACS) in the continental defense 
role. Moreover, an effective airborne 
interceptor control system would find 
important application in tactical situ- 
ations. For these reasons, we initiated 
two years ago the study of such a 
system, Five million dollars were pro- 
vided for FY 1968. We are now re- 
questing $3 million for FY 1907 to 
undertake a contract definition phase 
for a development prototypes of the 
aircraft itself. A complementary pro- 
gram to develop the overland radar 
technology, which is critical to the 
successful development of AWACS, 
is funded at $9 million in FY 19GG 
and $12 million more is requested for 
FY 1967. 

Improved Surfitce-to-Air Missiles. 
Our FY 1907 budget request provides 
for the continued development of im- 
provements to the Hawk missile sys- 
tem with a view to decreasing its re- 
action time, speeding up its" target- 
handling capability and improving its 
reliability. It also provides for" the 
continued development of an ad- 
vanced air defense system as a pos- 
sible replacement for both Hawk 
and Hercules in tho 1970's. This 
effort, now designated SAM-D, and 
the Hawk improvement program 
aro also oriented to the theater air 
defense problem and will be discussed 
further in connection with the Army's 
General Purpose Forces. 

Ballistic Missile Warning ami De- 
fense. 

Defense against ballistic missiles, 
once they are launched from sub- 
marines or land bases, comprises the 
capabilities for detecting, tracking, in- 
tercepting and destroying the incom- 
ing warheads. 

Ballistic Missile Early Warning 
System (HMI3WS). . . , The modifi- 
cation of certain SAGE and Space- 
track radars on the East, West and 
Gulf Coasts to give them a limited 
detection capability against sea- 
launched ballistic missiles, which I 
mentioned last year, is progressing on 
schedule. Tho $19 million already pro- 
grammed should essentially complete 
this program. 

Over-the-Hori/on lladnr. Last year 
I described our development of an 
over-the-horizon radar system capable 
of tho remote detection of missile 
launches. This development was un- 
dertaken to provide increased confi- 
dence in BMEWS warning, to extend 
tho warning time itself and to pre- 



vent a Soviet "end run" of BMEWS. 
Through FY 1966, about $42 million 
has been programmed for over-the- 
horizon radars; and another $2;j mil- 
lion is included in tho FY 19(17 
budget, 

The Character and Timing of a 
Deployment of ABM Defense. . . . 

In the coming fiscal year, wo propose 
to carry forward this entire broad- 
ened Nike X development, test and 
evaluation effort, including the Sprint 
missile; the new, long-range cxoat- 
mosphcric interceptor; tho now fami- 
ly of radars; and the construction of 
test facilities. Some $447 million has 
been provided in our 1967 Budget re- 
quest for this program. In addition, 
$119 million has been included for the 
related Defender program, which is 
concerned with vehicle re-entry mea- 
surements and analysis, advanced 
ABM techniques and devices and sys- 
tem studies. 

With respect to the defense of hard 
point targets, we have had for some 
years a multi-pronged effort to de- 
velop tho concepts and the compo- 
nents for an advanced weapon sys- 
tem. Tho two major elements 'of 
this effort are Hi-Bex an extremely 
high acceleration missile interceptor 
and Hapdar a complementary 
phased array radar. These projects 
have already been funded, a number 
of interceptor tests have boon made 
and the test just recently begun to 
operate. Over the next several months 
we will be studying and evaluating the 
data from these tests. 

Anti-Satellite Defense. 

Detection and tracking of foreign 
satellites is performed by the Space 
Detection and Tracking System 
(SPADATS). SPADATS acquires in- 
formation from three separata sour- 
ces: the Navy's SPASUB detection 
fence extending across the southern 
United States; the BMEWS screen uc- 
cro;ss the northern approaches; and 
Spacetrack, the worldwide network 
of ( radars and optical sensors. Tho 
principal investment now contem- 
plated for SPADATS is the construc- 
tion of a large phased array radar at 
Eglin Air Force Base. 

Wo arc also providing two largo 
ground based optical installations for 
satellite tracking and photography, 
The one at Cloudcroft, Now Mexico 
is already operational, and the other 
at Maui, Hawaii, will become opera- 
tional shortly. . . . 



Civil Defense 

The last of the seven major issues 
involved in our FY 1967-71 general 
nuclear war program concerns the 



future size and scope of the Civil De- 
fense program. Considering the great 
uncertainties regarding the other ele- 
ments of the Damage Limiting pro- 
gram, I do not believe that we should 
undertake, at this time, any major 
change in our present civil defense 
effort. Therefore, with but one ex- 
ception, the program I am recom- 
mending this yeai- is essentially the 
same as the one approved by the Con- 
gress for PY 1966. 

The principal innovation proposed 
for FY 1967 is a modest experimental 
program designed to stimulate the 
usa of construction techniques in 
new public non-federal or privately 
owned buildings which would at little 
or no extra cost, provide dual-use fall- 
out shelter space. ... I believe that 
this experimental program is a sound 
and logical step in our overall civil 
defense effort, and I urge the corn- 
mi tteo's support of our $10 million 
budget request for this purpose, , . . 

Shelter Survey. 

... To continue all of these shelter 
survey activities, $23 million is re- 
quested in the FY 1967 budget. 

Shelter Development. 

... To date, pilot Community Shelter 
Plans are under way in 57 areas and 
plans will bo started in 200 areas 
during the current year. For FY 
19i!7, $4 million is requested to extend 
this planning effort to another 200 
areas. , . . 

. . . Wo propose in FY 1967 to continue 
our efforts to provide the necessary 
architectural and engineering advice 
to the construction industry, at a cost 
of about $3 million. . . , 

Shelter in Federal Buildings, 

No additional funds are requested 
this year specifically for Regional 
Emergency Operating Centers or for 
single purpose shelter space in Fed- 
eral buildings. . . . 

Shelter Provisions. 

No funds are being requested for 
shelter supplies in FY 1967, except 
for $800,000 to be used for special 
protective packing for shelter sup- 



plies placed in. mines, caves and 

tunnels and to initiate a quality 

check of shelter stocks already in 
shelters. 

The balance of the $6.8 million 
shown for Shelter Provisions is for 
ventilation kits. . . . Procurement of a 
test quantity of 2,400 units is being 
made this year. The $6 million includ- 
ed in the FY 1967 budget would pro- 
vide a sufficient number of kits to 
make habitable another 2.8 million 
shelter spaces at a cost of a little more 
than $2 per space. 

Wa mints;. 

The $700,000 renuested under this 
heading is to continue the develop- 
ment effort on a radio system for in- 
door warning. 

Emergency Operations. 

For FY 1967, $13.1 million is includ- 
ed for the Emergency Broadcast Sys- 
tem, damage assessment, radiological 
defense, emergency operations systems 
development and technical support 
(primarily for communications and 
warning). 

. . . About $1.4 million is included in 
the FY 1907 budget to complete the 
equipping of the remaining 59 sta- 
tions and the related remote radio 
pick-up unit's. 

Operation of the National Civil De- 
fense Computer Facility and support 
of the damage assessment capability 
will require $1.5 million in FY 19G7; 
and $6.7 million is needed for pro- 
curement of 1,000 aerial survey meters 
for monitoring radiological fallout, 
engineering improvement of radio- 
logical instruments, and for weather 
services, warehousing and radiolog- 
ical instrument maintenance and cali- 
bration. 

The balance of $3.5 million ifi re- 
quired for emergency operations sys- 
tems development i.e., the applica- 
tion of results of research, engineer- 
ing tests and operations analyses to 
the solution of practical civil defense 
problems, and for communications 
advisory services and operation of the 
regional communications centers, 



Financial Assistance to States. 

. . , $30.5 million in matching- funds 
arc requested for FY 1967 for finan- 
cial assistance to the States. . . . 

He"carcli and Development. 

The $10 million requested for civil 
defense research and development 
will enable us to continue our efforts 
to obtain : fallout protection at lower 
costs per shelter space; better menus 
of warning the population and of con- 
trolling and directing emergency 
operations in damaged areas; nn im- 
proved technical base for post-attack 
survival and recuperation ; and im- 
proved data on the countermen surra 
against all effects of nuclear weapons. 

Management. 

For overall program management, 
$13.2 million is requested for FY 
1967. . . . 

Public Information. 

The $4 million requested for FY 
1967 is for the preparation of emer- 
gency information, instruction, dis- 
semination of technical iiiformnlinn 
and for programs to encourage the 
participation of industry in civil <lr- 
fense activities. 

TrainiiiR and Education. 

The $15. 6 million included urnler 
this heading will permit n continua- 
tion of the University Extension Pro- 
gram which provides professional 
civil defense training through the 
state university and "land-grunt" col- 
lege jsystems . . . adult education and 
rural education programs. The liitler 
program provides instruction for 
farm families on how to protect them- 
selves and their livestock against full- 
out. 

Financial Summary 

Tho Strategic Offensive Forces, the 
Strategic Defense Forces and the 
Civil Defense Program I havo ant- 
lined will require Total ObliRiUlona! 
Authority of $6.5 billion in FY 1W57. 
A comparison with prior yenra is 
shown below: 



($ Billions, Fiscal Years) 




1962 


1962 


1963 


1964 


1965 


1966 


1967 




Orig. 


Final 


Act, 


Act. 


Act. 


Est. 


Prop, 


Strategic Offensive Forces 


7.6 


8.9 


8.3 


7.3 


5.3 


5.1 


5.1 


Strategic Defensive Forces 


2,2 


2,0 


1,8 


1.9 


1,6 


1.6 


1.8 


Civil Defense 




.8 


.1 


,1 


.1 


.1 


.1 


Total 


9.8 


11.2 


10.2 


9.3 


6.9 


6.8 


6.5 



March 19** 



The General Purpose Forces in- 
clude most of the Army's combat and 
combat support units, virtually all 
Navy units (except for the Polaris 
forces,), all Marine Corps units, and 
the tactical units of the Air Force. 
These are the forces upon which we 
rely for all military actions short of 
general nuclear war, i.e., limited war 
and countcrinsurgency operations. 

The Requirements for 
General Purpose Forces 

Last year I discussed in some de- 
tail the nature of the limited war 
problem and our requirements for 
General Purpose Forces. I believe it 
would be useful, as a framework for 
your consideration of our present pro- 
gram proposals in this area, to sum- 
marize the main points of that dis- 
cussion : 

The distinction between general 
nuclear war forces and limited war 
forces is somewhat arbitrary in that 
all of our forces would be employed 
in a general war, and certain ele- 
ments of our strategic offensive-de- 
fensive forces could be employed in a 
limited war; and, indeed, we are to- 
day using some of our B-B2 strategic 
bombers against the Viet Gong and 
North Vietnamese forces in South 
Vietnam. But it is primarily the lim- 
ited war mission which shapes the 
size and character of the General 
Purpose Forces. 

The requirement for the bulk of 
these forces stems from this nation's 
commitment, in our own security in- 
terest, to the principle of collective 
defense of the Free World. . , . 

Force* must bo provided for the 
direct defense of U.S. territories and 
vital interests, i.e., the protection of 
U.S. shipping on the high seas, the 
defense of the Canal Xone, Puerto 
Rico, Cue. 

Each of these commitments could 
give rise to contingencies for which 
we must plan and provide military 
capabilities, We cannot hope to antici- 
pate and be fully prepared for every 
conceivable contingency and, for that 
matter, neither can our opponents. 
Moreover, the likelihood of predicting; 
contingencies in any degree of detail 
is, as we repeatedly discover, quite 
small, Accordingly, we must build 
into our General Purpose Forces a 
capability to deal with a very wide 
range of contingencies . . . 

Because of the close interrelation- 
ship between our forces and those of 
our allies in the collective defense of 



the Free World, it is in our own in- 
terest to help them support adequate 
forces wherever they cannot do the 
job alone. For this reason I have al- 
ways considered Military Assistance 
an integral part of our own defense 
program. 

The ability to concentrate our 
military power rapidly in a threatened 
area can make a great difference in 
the size of the force ultimately re- 
quired and, in some cases, can serve 
to halt aggression before it really gets 
started. That is why we have given a 
great deal of attention in recent years 
to the various ways of reducing our 
reaction time to limited war situa- 
tions airlift, sealift, propositioning 
of materiel, etc. 

The currently planned expansion 
of our airlift, together with the im- 
provement in our scalift and increases 
in propositioned equipment, will en- 
able us within a few years to move 
most of our central leserve of active 
ground forces overseas within 30 to 
60 days. Thus, to be of maximum 
value in the kind of limited war situa- 
tions we see ahead, the readiness of 
reserve components units should be 
brought to a level which would permit 
their deployment within that time. 

Another aspect of the General Pur- 
pose Forces problem which I discussed 
with the Committee in considerable de- 
tail last year was the role of tactical 
nuclear weapons in a limited war in 
iCuropc. I pointed out that our stud- 
ies in this area were still highly ten- 
tative, but that certain preliminary 
conclusions were warranted. Further 
study has advanced our understand- 
ing of this extremely difficult and 
complex problem, but our conclusions 
must still be considered tentative. . . . 

With respect to the Far East, we 
must distinguish between the Soviet 
and Chinese communist threats. Our 
present nuclear predominance com- 
bined with a strong conventional de- 
fense posture in the area is now and 
should continue to be fully adequate 
to deter deliberate Soviet aggression, 
nuclear or non-nuclear. 

The Chinese communists, however, 
will present a different kind of prob- 
lem in the years ahead. The full im- 
pllcatioiifl of this new threat in the 
Far East are as yet far from clear, 
and the question of what our theater 
nuclear posture in the Far East 
should be in the future will require 
continuing study. In this connection, 
there is one lesson that we can draw 
from our experience in Europe, and 
that is to avoid a strategy which 



relies almost wholly on the use of 
tactical nuclear weapons to cope with 
the enemy's "massive" ground forces. 

Capabilities of the 
Programmed Forces 

As I noted earlier, our General Pur- 
pose Forces requirements are derived 
from analyses of contingencies, in- 
cluding the support of our allies 
around the world. Accordingly, our 
General Purpose Forces capabilities 
must be assessed in conjunction with 
the capabilities of these allied forces. 
Although we have considerable knowl- 
edge of the force plans of our allies, 
we cannot be sure how they will 
change with the passage of time. 
This creates some uncertainty about 
the specific requirements for U.S. 
forces in the more distant years of 
the five-year programming period, for 
which we must make allowances in 
.our force planning 1 . 

The largest potential requirement 
for U.S. General Purpose Forces re- 
lates to a non-nuclear war in Europe. 
But the most immediate requirement 
today relates to our military effort in 
Southeast Asia. I believe it would be 
appropriate, therefore, to discuss the 
latter requirement first. 

Southeast Asia. 

. , . Now I would like to review with 
you the military aspects of the situ- 
ation in Southeast Asia, our objec- 
tives there, and how we plan to 
achieve them. 

We are dealing here with an im- 
mensely complicated problem, involv- 
ing not only our immediate and longer 
range miltary objectives, but U.S. for- 
eign policy and local political, eco- 
nomic and social considerations as 
well. While the military task in Viet- 
nam is still largely a counterinsin 1 - 
gency effort, it is in many other re- 
spects a conventional limited war 
against external aggression. This is 
so because the communist aggression. 
against South Vietnam is directed, 
controlled and supported by the gov- 
ernment of North Vietnam, not only 
with men, materiel and money, but 
with its own regular military forces 
as well. Moreover, North Vietnam it- 
self is receiving sxibstantia! materiel 
support (but, as yet, no combat 
forces) from Communist China and, 
indeed, is being pressured by that 
country to continue the conflict. North 
Vietnam is also receiving important 
materiel support from the Soviet Un- 
ion, including ground-to-air missiles. 

However, the struggle in South 
Vietnam has not only become a major 
test case of the communists' doctrine 
of the so-called "wars of national lib- 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



eration," it has also become a test 
case between the Soviet and Chinese 
communist versions of that doctrine. 
As I pointed out earlier, according to 
Chinese communist doctrine, Vietnam 
is now the main focus of their cam- 
paign to subvert by violence indepen- 
dent nations in Asia, Latin America 
and Africa. The Soviet Union, ap- 
parently, would prefer to achieve the 
same goal by less violent means. 

We must also take into account, in 
formulating our military objectives 
and operational plans for Vietnam, 
the unique character of that conflict. 
Since it is basically a war of terror 
and subversion, supported and direct- 
ed from without, there are no estab- 
lished lines across which armies face 
armies with each side having well- 
defined, contiguous areas under its 
control. Instead, the territory of South 
Vietnam is controlled in varying de- 
grees by the government and by the 
communists. Some areas are firmly 
under the control of the government, 
some under the control of the com- 
munists, and still other areas are con- 
trolled by neither side. This requires 
that our military efforts in South 
Vietnam consist of widely dispersed 
military operations directed at the 
scattered and changing areas of com- 
munist control. 

As I noted in my appearance be- 
fore this committee last August, the 
communists had apparently decided 
by early 1965 to make an all-out at- 
tempt to bring down the legitimate 
government of South Vietnam. The 
entire economic and social structure 
was brought under attack. Agricul- 
tural products were barred from the 
cities. Electric power plants and com- 
munications lines were systematically 
sabotaged. Whole villages wore burned 
and their inhabitants driven away, in- 
creasing the refugee burden on the 
government of South Vietnam. 

This onslaught has taken its toll. 
The economy of South Vietnam is, 
indeed, now in serious difficulty. The 
social structure has been disrupted 
and hundreds of thousands of people 
have to lie resettled and given gain- 
ful employment. These problems can- 
not be solved by military means alone. 
Indeed, our economic aid effort at this 
time is at least as important as our 
military effort, not only in keeping 
South Vietnam viable as a nation but 
also in helping consolidate the gains 
of that military effort. 

Policy Objectives and Military Tasks 
in Vietnam. Our overall policy objec- 
tive in South Vietnam is a stable and 
independent government free of com- 
munist control. Our immediate objec- 
tive is to force the communists to 
move the conflict from the battlefield 



to the conference table. The basic 
tasks which flow from these objectives 
are: 

To support the re-establishment 
of the authority of the government 
of South Vietnam over its territory. 

To exert pressure on the govern- 
ment of North Vietnam to cease its 
direction and support of the commu- 
nist insurrection in South Vietnam. 

To deter Communist China from 
direct intervention in the conflict in 
South Vietnam and to defeat such in- 
tervention if it ocurs. 

The following concept of military 
operations has been developed in col- 
laboration with the South Vietnamese 
military command. The ground forces 
United States, Korean, Australian, 
New Zealand, as well as South Viet- 
namese will conduct four major 
types of operations which broadly ov- 
erlap one another; 

"Search and destroy" operations, 
designed to destroy known or sus- 
pected communist forces and their 
base areas (supplies, communications 
and installations). These operations 
are not intended to seize and hold ter- 
ritory permanently. 

"Clear and secure" operations to 
eliminate, permanently, residual com- 
munist forces from specified limited 
areas. These operations are designed 
to hold territory and are undertaken 
only when it is considered possible to 
conduct, on a continuing basis, the 
full range of pacification measures 
required to secure the area. 

"Eeserve reaction" operations de- 
signed to relieve provincial capitals 
and district towns under communist 
attack and to reinforce friendly forces 
when needed. 

Defense of government centers, 
including the protection of provincial 
capitals, district towns, key govern- 
mental facilities and installations. 

The strike elements of the regular 
South Vietnamese forces, together 
with U.S. and other Free World 
forces (i.e., Korean and Australian/ 
New Zealand) are concentrating on 
the first type of operation. The South 
Vietnamese forces, with some assist- 
ance from U.S. and other Free World 
forces, particularly in areas contigu- 
ous to their own bases, are assuming 
primary responsibility for the second 
type of operations. The third type is 
again primarily the responsibility of 
the South Vietnamese forces with 
such help as may be required from 
U.S. and other Free World forces. 
The fourth type is essentially the re- 
sponsibility of the South Vietnamese 
forces, 

1 want to reiterate that the fore- 
going: allocation of responsibilities is 



very general and, in actual practice, 
will vary according to the particular 
circumstances. A maximum degree of 
flexibility is needed to deal with the 
very fluid military situation which 
exists in South Vietnam. 

The regular South Vietnamese 
ground forces are being assisteil in 
the "clear and secure" and the "de- 
fense of government centers" oper- 
ations by the "Regional" forces. The 
"Popular" forces are assisting at the 
village level in providing long-term 
security in areas already cleared by 
the regular combat forces and the 
"Regional" forces. The "Popular" 
forces are also participating in the 
pacification task. The re -establish- 
ment of normal governmental func- 
tions is primarily the responsibility 
of the civil authorities and the na- 
tional police. 

The air forces (USAF, USN, 
USMC and VNAF) are conducting 
close support air strike, suppressive 
fire, airlift and reconnaissance oper- 
ations in support of the ground forces 
and reconnaissance and strike oper- 
ations in support of the interdiction 
mission, including sea surveillance. 
Our concept of operations calls for a 
massive application of airpower in 
every form. This is also true in the 
case of artillery. In effect, we are try- 
ing to substitute, to the maximum ex- 
tent feasible, the expenditure of ma- 
teriel in place of the expenditure of 
our manpower. For example, in the 
case of ammunition, wo have added 
to the $1.1 billion included in the 
original FY 106(1 budget, $800 million 
from the August amendment and $2.1 
billion from the FY 19G6 supplemen- 
tal giving us a total of about $U 
billion for ammunition in FY 1966. 
And, another $3.7 billion for ammu- 
nition is included in the FY 1001 
budget. , . . 

The Communist Forces in South 
Vietnam. When , I appeared before 
this Committee last August in sup- 
port of the Amendment to the FY 
1966 Defense Budget, I said; 

"We now estimate the hard core 
Viet Cong strength at some 70,- 
000 men, including a recently re- 
ported increase in the number of 
combat battalions. In addition, 
they have some 90,000 to 100,000 
irregulars and some 30,000 in 
their political cadres, i.e., tax col- 
lectors, propagandists, etc, We 
have also identified at least three 
battalions of the regular North 
Vietnamese Army, and there ar 
probably considerably more/' 

We now believe that the communists' 
military and paramilitary forces in 
South Vietnam total over 236,000 com- 



10 



March 1966 



pared with the 190,000-200,000 esti- 
mated last summer. The communist 
hard core strength totals about 87,- 
000, the irregulars number about 
110,000, and the political cadres about 
39,000. Within these totals, the con- 
firmed North Vietnamese regular army 
forces in South Vietnam now number 
at least 11,000 men, and there are 
probably more. 

The most significant increase dur- 
ing the last three or four months has 
been in the North Vietnamese forces; 
the Viet Cong forces appear to he in- 
creasing more slowly than heretofore. 
As I have noted on previous occasions, 
these trends were anticipated some 
time ago. The heavy losses suffered 
by the Viet Cong during the last six 
months have made it very difficult for 
them to raise their strength and the 
communists have hcen forced increas- 
ingly to rely on the regular North 
Vietnamese Army in their attempt to 
match our buildup. For example, dur- 
ing the last half of 19GB, Viet Cong 
combat deaths reached an annual rate 
at about 47,1.00 compared with about 
1(5,800 for 1904. Viet Cong captured 
during this period rose to an annual 
rate of about 7,800 compared with 
about 4,200 for 1964 while the rate 
of known Viet Cong defectors rose to 
about 12,500 compared with 1,900 in 
1964. 

We must assume that the number 
of North Viet7iamese regular army 
troops in South Vietnam will continue 
to increase substantially in the months 
ahead as we step up our attacks on 
the communists' main forces and work 
to expand the government's control 
over the population and territory of 
South Vietnam, thus further limiting 
their potential sources of supply for 
indigenous military manpower, 

With regard to logistic support, the 
Viet Cong itself apparently depends 
upon internal sources for almost all 
"non-military" supplies, particularly 
food, clothing and construction mate- 
rials. It appears that they produce 
mines anil grenades and purchase 
clandestinely in South Vietnam such 
items as medicine, storage batteries 
and other civilian-type goods. But both 
the Viet Gong and North Vietnamese 
forces in South Vietnam are becoming 
increasingly dependent upon external 
sources of supply (for arms and am- 
munition, communications equipment, 
bulk medical supplies, etc.). Particu- 
larly important are the 7.62mm rifles 
and machine guns, grenade launchers, 
recoilless guns and mortars, and their 
ammunition, Much of these arms and 
ammunition is of Communist Chinese 
manufacture but some of it has been 
made in the USSR or in Czechoslo- 
vakia. 



The supply lines from North Viet- 
nam through Laos and South Viet- 
nam arc well known, although they 
are very difficult to interdict. Not so 
well understood is the source of sup- 
plies coming from Cambodia. The bor- 
ders are so inadequately policed that 
it is probable the communists are 
able to infiltrate supplies and troops 
through that country, both south from 
Laos and north from the sea. The in- 
creasing effectiveness of our -sea sur- 
veillance leads us to believe that less 
of the supplies are coming in to South 
Vietnam directly by sea. . . . 



Army Genera! Purpose Forces 

During the past year, we have made 
a number of decisions which affect the 
sine and composition of the Army 
General Purpose Forces proposed for 
the FY 1967-71 period. 

As you will remember, we conduct- 
ed a series of field tests during FY 
1968 and FY 1964 of new air mobility 
concepts. Last March, the JCS com- 
pleted their analysis of these test re- 
sults, and, in June, on the basis of the 
JCS recommendations, I authorized the 
Army to proceed with the organiza- 
tion of a new airmobile division, us- 
ing the resources of the 2nd Infan- 
try Division and the provisional llth 
Air Assault Division which had been 
temporarily established for the tests. 
Shortly after forming up last sum- 
mer, this division was deployed to 
Vietnam. Completely air- transport- 
able, it has AM organic aircraft, more 
than four times the number author- 
ized in a regular infantry division. 
These aircraft, almost all of which 
are helicopters, provide such an im- 
provement in mobility and reaction 
time that entirely new tactics have 
become possible. On the basis of this 
division's performance in South Viet- 
nam, we are planning on the conver- 
sion of one additional division to the 
airmobile configuration. Funds have 
been included in the FY 10Gfi-07 bud- 
get to initiate the procurement of long 
lead time equipment required for this 
purpose. A date for the conversion 
lias yet to be determined. . . . 

Army Procurement. 

As I indicated at the beginning of 
this statement, wo have made very 
heavy investments in Army procure- 
ment since FY 1961. Nevertheless, be- 
cause of the projected consumption in 
Southeast Asia and the previously dis- 
cussed force augmentations, the Army 
procurement programs which we now 
recommend for FY 1966 and FY 1967 
are the largest since the Korean War. 

Our present logistics guidance pro- 
vides that the Army will procure ini- 



tial equipment for 26 ^ division force 
equivalents including the 16 perma- 
nent and one temporary active divi- 
sion forces, the eight priority reserve 
forces, four brigade forces and all the 
related combat, combat support and 
logistics support imits, . . . 

Essentially, the FY 19GC-G7 pro- 
curement programs proposed for the 
Army have been developed to provide 
for all projected combat consumption 
in Southeast Asia and to meet in full 
our war reserve inventory objectives 
in accordance with the logistic stand- 
ards just described. The revised FY 
196(1 program now totals $5,045 mil- 
lion, of which $2,4(55 million is includ- 
ed in the supplemental request. The 
FY 1967 program totals $3,661 mil- 
lion. But, again, I want to remind you 
that for purposes of developing our 
FY 1966-67 budget requests we have 
assumed that combat operations in 
Southeast Asia will continue through 
June 30, 1907. If it later appears that 
combat will continue! ncyond that date, 
more funds will be needed for FY 
1967. 

Aircraft. . . . The FY 196G program 
now totals $1,338 million for 3,044 air- 
craft, of which $826 million is in- 
cluded in the supplemental request. 
The FY 1967 request includes ipbOS 
million for 1,532 aircraft, 

The largest single aircraft item is 
the UH-1B/D helicopter, of which we 
propose to procure very large num- 
bers in both FY 1060 and FY 19(37. 

Wo also propose to raise the pro- 
duction rate of CH-47A*K in order to 
speed up the achievement of the in- 
ventory objective and provide for 
projected attrition. The quantities of 
these transport helicopters proposed 
in the FY 19GG and FY 1967 requests 
will satisfy almost all of the Army's 
total procurement requirement. 

The proposed purchases of LOII- 
OA'a in FY 1966 and FY 1907 will 
permit a stepped up modernization of 
the observation aircraft inventory, 

The FY 1966 supplemental request 
includes funds for the first opera- 
tional quantity of CH-G4A heavy lift 




U.S. Army CH-54A Heavy Lift 
Helicopter. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



11 



helicopters and more are included in 
the FY 1967 budget request. . . - 

We also propose to procure some 
fixed-wing utility aircraft in FY 1966, 
as well as a substantial number of 
trainer aircraft to meet the expanded 
pilot training requirements of the 
Army. At this time, no further 
trainer aircraft procurement is con- 
templated for FY 1967. 

Missiles. Army missile procurement 
(including spares) will total $369 mil- 
lion in FY 1966 ($64 million in the 
supplemental request) and $357 mil- 
lion in FY 1967. 

The current year's procurement of 
Pershing missiles will complete the 
presently planned inventory require- 
ments and provide for training con- 
sumption. Funds are included in the 
FY 1967 budget to finance the pro- 
curement of improved ground support 
equipment. 

For Lance, $19 million of available 
funds will he used in FY 1966 for 
production tooling and advance pro- 
duction engineering. In FY 1967, we 
propose to procure a substantial num- 
ber of the missiles and the associated 
ground support equipment. 

The revised FY 1966 program for 
Shillelagh includes a large purchase 
of missiles and the FY 196V request 
includes an even greater quantity. , . . 

For Redeye, the man-transportable, 
shoulder-fired air defense missile, the 
revised FY 1966 program provides for 
a major purchase of missiles, and the 
FY 1967 request includes a large ad- 
ditional quantity. These procurements 
will meet the present tactical inven- 
tory objective and provide for train- 
ing consumption. 

The funds requested for Hawk in 
FY 1967 will provide the necessary 
ground support equipment for the 
previously discussed conversion of 
Hawk battalions to the self-propelled 
configuration, advance production en- 
gineering for the Improved Hawk mis- 
sile, and modified fire control equip- 
ment designed to increase Hawk effec- 
tiveness. 



The FY 1967 request includes $62 
million for the Chaparral missile sys- 
tem. This amount will provide for the 
procurement of a large quantity of 
missiles, the self-propelled and towed 
fire units, and equipment for train- 
ing and testing the Chaparral. 

Weapons and Combat Vehicles. The 

revised 1 FY 1966 program for weap- 
ons and combat vehicles totals $521 
million, of which $181 million is in- 
cluded in the FY 1966 supplemental. 
For FY 1967, $428 million is re- 
quested. 

As part of the stepped-up program 
to improve the Army's forward area 
air defense capability, we are buying 
this year the first increment of self- 
propelled Vulcan M-61A 20mm anti- 
aircraft guns to complement the capa- 
bility of the Chaparral missile. . . . 
The funds requested for FY 1967 will 
provide for procurement of more guns 
together with fire control equipment 
for both the FY 1966 and FY 19G7 
programs. 

We have also included funds in the 
FY 1967 budget for the second incre- 
ment of the Hispano Suiza 20mm 
guns, as part of the program to up- 
grade the firepower of our M-114 ar- 
mored command and reconnaissance 
vehicle which presently mounts a 50 
cal. machine gun. The required quan- 
tity of this gun is being procured over 
a three-year period, 

The FY 1907 program includes a 
substantial number of self-propelled 
lG5mm howitzers and M-E78 light 
recovery vehicles. The IGBmm how- 
itzers arc replacing the 105mm 
weapons. 

Included also is the second incre- 
ment of General Sheridan armored 
reconnaissance and airborne assault 
vehicles. 

During FY 1967, we plan to main- 
tain a production rate of the basic 
M-113 chassis sufficient to meet the 
combined requirements for the self- 
propelled 81mm mortar carriers and 
the XM-548 cargo carriers, both of 
which use this chassis. 



The proposed FY 
provides for the 
Kation of the Army'ii lanl.. 
We now plan to rolrnlit li- 
bers of M-48 mud him Ituit, i 
diesel engines and lOlnnm 
procure a number nf n. 
equipped with the Sliilli-l, ( 
gun. Together with n MU,. 
of armored vehicle lnii| r ,- , 
bat engineer vuhirlcii wlit. \ 
same chassis, the pluniinl ' 
procurement will mipinui 
mum sustaining nmnthK i 
rate. 

We presently have mnU i 
velopment with tlic I't-il.-! !( | 
of Germany the Main 
now scheduled for inln 
the operational invi'iiliny 
1970's. In FY 10(17, vy- 
ing $10 million for mtv 
tion engincoring. (Kim 
included in the Iti*ilt pi., 
port the U.S. shari 1 nf 
ment.) 



il 



Tactical and Huppm'! w 
FY 1966 program I'm 
trailers and other nun i 
cles now totals $(JOH milli'- 
$253 million ia indiitlnl 
plemental request. Km l-'V 
million is requeued for tits 
including Vi-ton IrucUii, ", 
and 1 VI -ton truckn, '.!*:; 
and 5-ton vehicles! nf vn 
Included in the I'/i-Inn IIM 
ment is the Gamnm (i" 
vehicle which is nnni"' .< -1 
arate tractor IUH! |mv,. 
joined together to iiii|<i-- 
mobility, . , . Wn pi'Mjiu 
first increment of Uir ' 
FY 19G7. 

ConummicatiouH mill l; 

For communication;! uh>l 
procurement, the KV li''- 
quest included $H!t!l " 
revised FY l!)(i(i iirniritnr, 
$450 million of whlrli S'-' 
included in tho Hupl't''" 1 '' 1 ' 





Lance Ballistic Missile. 



Chaparral Launch Vehicle. 



20mm Vulcan Wcniitm 



12 



The PY 1967 program includes an- 
other major purchase of AN/VIIC-12 
vehicular radios, and the initiation of 
procurement of some of the radio re- 
lay equipment for the Army Area 
Communications System (AACOMS). 

Ammunition. For ammunition, the 
Army's revised FY 1966 program in- 
cludes $1,278 million, of which $671 
million is included in the supplemen- 
tal. For FY 1967, $1,052 million is 
requested. 

A large procurement of small arms 
ammunition (5.56mm and 7.62mm 
cartridges) is proposed for the cur- 
rent fiscal year to meet projected 
Southeast Asia consumption. The 
quantities requested for FY 1967 will 
fully meet the inventory objective for 
these items, 

We propose to make large pur- 
chases of both 20mm and 40mm am- 
munition in FY 1966. In both FY I960 
and FY 1967 we will procure 20mm 
ammo for the Vulcan air defense gun 
and for the Hispano-Suiza gun mount- 
ed on the M-114 armored command 
and reconnaissance vehicle. All of the 
40mm ammunition proposed for FY 
I960 and FY 19(57 are cartridges used 
with the M-79 grenade launcher and 
a rapid fire helicopter-mounted ver- 
sion widely employed in Vietnam. 
Funds are also included in FY 1967 
for a new anti-aircraft fuxc. This 
fuze will he fitted on existing 40mm 
ammo to be used by the "Duster" an- 
ti-aircraft units which we arc reac- 
tivating. . , . 

Similarly, most of the large in- 
crease in 81mm, 105mm, 106mm, 
and 4.2 inch cartridges and in 2.75 
inch rockets is related to Southeast 
Asia requirements. The increase in 
procurement of 152mm ammunition 
is to build up initial inventories for 
the new Sliillealagh/gun turret on the 
M-60 tanks and for the gun/launcher 
on the General Sheridan vehicle. The 
larger quantities of 155mm ammuni- 
tion arc required to keep pace with 
the growing inventory of 165mm self- 
propelled howitzers as well as to pro- 



vide for increased consumption in 
Vietnam. 

Other Support Equipment. The re- 
vised FY 1966 program for other 
support equipment totals $312 million, 
of which $195 million is included in 
the supplemental request. These 
funds are required for such items as 
electric field generators, road graders, 
cranes, tractors, bridge components, 
shop equipment, fork lift trucks, etc. 
For FY 1967, $262 million is re- 
quested. 

Production Base Program. The re- 
vised FY 1966 program for produc- 
tion base support totals $174 million, 
of which $34 million is included in 
the supplemental request, For FY 
1967, $50 million is requested. 

Navy General Purpose Forces 

Except for the Vietnam augmenta- 
tions, the major changes in the Navy 
General Purpose Forces proposed for 
the FY 1966-71 period from the pro- 
gram envisioned last year concern the 
attack carriers and their air wings, 
the anti-submarine warfare forces and 
the guided missile destroyers, 
Attack Carrier Forces. 

In my appearance here last year in 
support of the FY 1966-70 program 
and FY 1966 Budget, I discussed a 
plan which would have reduced the 
attack carrier forces to 13 ships and 
13 air wings by the early 1970's, A 
reduction of this order was consid- 
ered appropriate for several reasons: 
the introduction of far more effective 
ships and aircraft into the Fleet, the 
release of the attack carriers from 
the strategic alert mission, and the 
overall increase in quantity, range 
and effectiveness of land-based tac- 
tical air power generally. Since that 
time a plan has been developed for 
the attack carrier forces which I be- 
lieve is superior to the one discussed 
last year. Under the new plan, the 
number of ships would be held at 16 
but the number of air wings would 
be reduced to 12 an increase of two 
ships and a reduction of one air wing 
compared with the previous plan. Sig- 




105mm Recoillcss Rifle. 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



The XM 3 2.75" Rocket Launcher. 



nificantly more useable combat power 
could be obtained from a force of 15 
carriers and 12 air wings than from 
a force of 13 carriers and 13 air wings, 
and at no increase in cost. . . . 

Ships ... To provide for the pro- 
gressive modernization of the attack 
carrier force, we have included funds 
for the construction of a new nuclear- 
powered attack carrier in our FY 
1967 request. When tins ship is de- 
livered to the Fleet, we will have ten 
large carriers and three of the Mid- 
way-class. Now thnt we plan to re- 
tain a force of 15 carriers, two more 
new carriers will have to be provided, 
and these have been tentatively sched- 
uled for later years. These, also, would 
be nuclear-powered. As these ships 
are delivered to the Fleet, the Essex- 
class carriers will be retired from the 
CVA force which would then consist 
of four nuclear-powered, eight For- 
restal-class and three Midway-class 
carriers, for a total of 15, 

Carrier Aircraft. Approximately 80 
percent of the total air complement 
of the attack carrier forces is cur- 
rently organized into 15 carrier air 
wings; the remaining 20 percent is 
made up of aircraft used for combat 
readiness training. The decline in the 
total number of fighters after FY 
1967 reflects two factors the reduc- 
tion from 15 to 12 wings and the sub- 
stitution of the F-lllB's for other air- 
craft on less than a one-for-one basis 
when these aircraft become opera- 
tional. As I noted in previous years, 
the F-111B promises a substantial in- 
crease in effectiveness over the F-4, 
the Navy's current first-line fighter, 
Eventually, the fighter force will con- 
sist of F-lllB's, F-4's and F-8'a. The 
F-8's are retained for the Essex-class 
carrier which cannot effectively oper- 
ate the F-4's or F-lllB's. The nttnck 
aircraft complement will consist of 
A-6's, A-4's and A-7's. 

In the reconnaissance/ECM area, a 
new aircraft, the EA-GB will he in- 
troduced into the force. It will be far 
more capable than the EA-1F which 
it will replace. We will also continue 
the conversion of the A-5A'a to the 
RA-6C configuration for use on the 
Forrestal -class carriers. The RF-8's 
will continue to be used on the Essex- 
class and Midway-class carriers. 

ASW-Survcillance and Ocean 
Patrol Forces. 

Last year I pointed out that the 
preliminary findings of a Navy study 
indicated that we were, generally, irt 
better shape with regard to the sub- 
marine threat than we had previously 
thought, but that a continued high 
level of ASW research and develop- 
ment would be needed to hedge 
against the possibility of a more 
sophisticated threat in the future. 



13 



ASW Carriers (CVS). At the end 
of FY 1965, we had nine Essex-class 
CVS's, all but one of which had 
"angled" decks. The one "straight 
deck" carrier is less capable than the 
others and, because of the adequacy 
of our overall ASW capability, we 
have decided to phase it out of the 
force during the current fiscal year, 
with a reduction in annual operating 
costs of about $22 million. This will 
leave eight CVS's in the Fleet, four 
for the Atlantic and four for the 
Pacific, plus one training carrier in 
the Atlantic. . . . 

The ASW carrier forces will con- 
tinue to be equipped with both fixed- 
wing aircraft and helicopters. The 
older SH-34 helicopters have already 
been replaced with the new SH-3A/D. 
The older S-2's are being replaced by 
the S-2E's. As I noted last year, we 
are also providing a few A-4's for each 
CVS in order to give them a limited 
intercept and air defense capability. 

Attack Submarine Forces. By the 

end of the current fiscal year, the sub- 
marine force, excluding Polaris, will 
number 105 ships, 24 of which will 
be nuclear powered, While last year's 
program called for 31 nuclear-pow- 
ered submarines to be in the force by 
this July, the Submarine Safety Pro- 
gram has resulted in some slippage. 
However, by end FY 1967 this slip- 
page should be made up and we will 
be back on schedule. 

Our continuing study of the ASW 
problem indicated that a total of about 
64 first class SSN's will be needed. 
A total of BO SSN's were funded 
through FY 1965, one of which, the 
Thresher, was lost. Two nuclear- 
powered submarines (one radar 
picket and one Regulus equipped 
SSN) were reassigned to the SSN 
role, making a total of 51 available. 
These two submarines and the two 
earliest SSN's are not deemed suitable 
for certain types of operations, leav- 
ing 47 available for missions requiring 
first class SSN's. Six SSN's were pro- 
vided by the Congress in FY 1966, 
leaving a total of 11 SSN's to be 
funded in FY 1967 and subsequent 
years. We propose to start five SSN's 
in FY 1967 and the remainder in 
future years. This program will give 
us a total of 64 first class SSN's, plus 
four other SSN's which could be used 
together with the conventionally pow- 
ered submarines for other missions. 

Sonar improvements will be made 
on almost all of the earlier SSN's to 
bring them up to the standard's of the 
latest SSN's. About $33 million has 
been included in the FY 1967 budget 
to start this program. 



Destroyer Escorts Our currently 

planned construction program for de- 
stroyer escorts is the same as I de- 
scribed a year ago, and another 10 
DE's have been included in the FY 
1967 budget. Beginning with the 
ships funded in the FY 1964 program, 
all of the destroyer escorts now being 
built will be equipped with the new 
SQS-2G sonar, a highly effective sys- 
tem for submarine detection. Most of 
the earlier DE's and a large number 
of DD's, DDG's, and CG's (a total of 
160 ships in all) will be equipped with 
the improved SQS-28 sonar. This im- 
provement will significantly enhance 
their submarine detection and classi- 
fication capabilities. About $14 mil- 
lion of available funds has been pro- 
grammed for this purpose in FY 
1966, and approximately $14 million 
more has been included in the FY 
1967 budget request. 

We also plan to continue our pro- 
gram to improve the ASW capabili- 
ties of 13 DD-931 class destroyers, 
all of which are less than ten years 
old. These ships will be provided with 
ASROC (including the Underwater 
Battery Fire Control System), im- 
proved communications equipment, a 
new variable depth sonar and im- 
proved ECM capabilities, plus certain 
minor structural modifications at a 
cost of about $12 million each. With 
these improvements, the DD-931 class 
destroyers will be comparable to and, 
in some ways, even better in the ASW 
role than the DE's we are now build- 
ing at a cost of about $29 million 
each, Five conversions were funded in 
FY 1966. Five more are included in 
the FY 1967 Budget. . . . 

Small Patrol Ships. The program 
authorized through FY 1966 will pro- 
vide a total of 33 small patrol craft 
by FY 1969, No further increases 
in these types of vessels are being 
proposed. However, as I indicated in 
my appearance before this committee 
in August, we have greatly increased 
the procurement of the smaller Swift 
craft, which are not included in the 
Small Patrol Ship category. These 



craft are designed for very close-in 
coastal search and surveillance. In ad- 
dition, we are procuring a large num- 
ber of river patrol craft (small water 
jet boats) financed by reprogramming 
about $9 million of available funds. 

Patrol Aircraft. As I indicated last 
year, we plan to maintain a force of 
30 squadrons of ASW patrol aircraft, 
three squadrons of seaplanes (SP-5's) 
and 27 squadrons of land-based air- 
craft (SP-2's and P-8's). Eventually, 
ail of the SP-2's will bo replaced by 
P-3's. Beginning,' with the FY IflGB 
buy, we plan that all new P-3 aircraft 
will be equipped with a new avionics 
system (A-NEW) at a cost of about 
$1 million per aircraft. . . . 
Multi-Purposc Ships 

We have grouped in this category 
those ships which possess capabilities 
for both anti-submarine warfare and 
Fleet air defense. There will bo 265 
such ships in the Fleet at the end of 
the current fiscal year, the bulk of 
them destroyer types. Many of these 
ships will have a guided missile capa- 
bility. 

Last year I described the four part 
program which we wore undertaking 
to improve the air defense capabilities 
of the Fleet: (1) the Ta r tar-Terr ler- 
Talos "Get Well" program, designed 
to correct deficiencies in missile ships 
already built or under construction; 

(2) the SAM (Surface-to-Air Missile) 
improvement program, designed to 
develop a new and more effective 
"Standardized" missile for use on both 
the Tartar and Terrier launchers and 
to provide for the incorporation of 
other improvements in these systems; 

(3) the Advanced Surface Missile 
System (ASMS), designed to provide 
Fleet air defense for the 1970's; and' 

(4) the Guided Missile Ship Modern- 
ization/Conversion program, designed 
to improve the air defense capabilities 
of 22 existing guided missile ships. 

Funding for the "Get Well" pro- 
gram has been substantially com- 
pleted. Necessary hardware is being 
procured and installed The SAM im- 
provement program is now well under 




Aircraft Carrier USS America. 



SH-3A Sea King Helicopters. 



14 



March 1966 



way. A substantial number of the 
"Standardized" missiles are being 
procured in FY 1966 (half medium 
and half extended range) for test, 
evaluation and documentation. . . . 

. . . We, therefore, propose to start 
two new guided missile destroyers in 
FY 19G7, at a total cost of about $145 
million. . . . 

In addition to these two new ships, 
we would also continue the Guided 
Missile Modernisation / Conversion 
program which I described to you last 
year. Under this program, four 
cruisers and 18 frigates would be 
converted or modernized during the 
FY 1006-70 period, at a total cost of 
about SpGOO million. Three of these 
ships were funded in the 1!>6(> pro- 
gram and six more (one cruiser and 
five frigates) are included in the FY 
19G7 budget. During the period of ac- 
tual conversion/modernization, these 
ships are not considered operationally 
doployable, which accounts for the 
slight decline in guided missile ships 
in the FY 1008-70 period. 

We are also studying the feasibility 
of providing a "close in" defense sys- 
tem, for combat .ships to augment their 
existing air defense capability. . . . 
Provision has been made in the FY 
1067 budget of this Point Defense 
Surface Missile System. . . . 
Amphibious Assault Ships. 

Two years ago I presented a pro- 
grain designed to provide a modern- 
ized (20 knot) amphibious lift for 
1% Marino Corps Division/Wing 
teams by FY 1972 plus sufficient older 
ships to provide a slower lift for an- 
other half of a Division/Wing team. 
This program, as adjusted last year, 
involved the construction of n large 
number of new ships during the FY 
196G-G9 period. Our goal was to build 
toward a capability to land about one- 
third ,0! the assault troops by helicop- 
ter, one-third by amphibian vehicles 
and one-third by either helicopter or 
landing craft, whatever the specific 
situation might dictate, 

However, further study of this pro- 
gram has convinced us that Home 
modification is desirable. The Navy 



is now investigating the possibility of 
designing a multi-purpose amphibious 
ship which could combine the features 
of several of the current specialized 
types. Accordingly, we have resched- 
uled the entire program, first, to pro- 
vide time to develop a new ship design 
and, second, to accelerate the con- 
struction of the types most needed 
now. Under the program now pro- 
posed, 12 ships (11 LST's and one 
LSD) would be started in FY 1967 at 
a cost of $306 million. 

As I noted last year, we are reac- 
tivating four "fire support" ships 
from the reserve fleet during FY 1966 
three Medium Landing Ships, 
Rocket (LSMR) and one Inshore Fire 
Support Ship (IFS). We are also re- 
taining in the Fleet two heavy gun 
cruisers which had previously been 
scheduled for deactivation in FY 
1907-08. We believe that these forces 
will be sufficient to provide the ship- 
to-shore fire support required under 
present conditions. 

Mine Warfare Forces 

. . . Five new minesweepers (MSO) 
will be started in FY 1967 at a cost 
of $43 million. These new ships will 
replace tho older minesweepers 
(MSC) which will phase into our 
Naval Reserve Training Fleet to re- 
place still older ships and expand that 
force. 

We are now accelerating the heli- 
copter minesweeping program which 
I mentioned last year and have begun 
procurement of the sweep equipment. 
We plan to provide this emergency 
mincswceping capability for a sub- 
stantial number of Marine Corps ver- 
tical assault helicopters (CII-53A's). 
During FY 1967 we propose to re- 
configure some of these helicopters to 
accept the sweep equipment. The 
equipment will be stowed aboard the 
helicopter assault carriers where it 
can lie quickly installed in the air- 
craft as needed. This element of the 
minesweeping program will give us, 
at a modest cost, a significantly aug- 
mented mineswoeping capability for 
certain types of operations. We also 




Destroyer Escort USS Garcia, 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



LST USS Washtenaw County. 



tentatively plan to procure additional 
helicopters with this emergency sweep 
capability for use aboard mine coun- 
termeasure support ships now planned 
for procurement in future years. 

Logistical, Operational Support and 
Direct Support Ships 

We presently plan on a force of 
about 168 logistical and operational 
support ships at the end of the cur- 
rent fiscal year, slightly more than 
scheduled a year ago. Because of in- 
creased requirements related to South- 
east Asia, we have activated eight of 
these fleet support ships from the Re- 
serve Fleet. 

For the future, I believe that the 
number of these fleet support ships 
can be reduced as faster and larger 
ships are constructed and delivered. 
Last year we had tentatively sched- 
uled the construction of 14 ships in 
FY 1967. However, with all icebreak- 
ers being transferred to Coast Guard 
jurisdiction, the one scheduled for 
construction in the FY 1967 prog'ram 
has been dropped. We also have de- 
ferred procurement of two auxiliary 
tugs (ATA's) and a fast combat sup- 
port ship (AOE), A hydrofoil coun- 
termeasures ship (AGHS) has been 
deferred to permit completion of the 
testing of the experimental version. 
Construction of a small replenishment 
tanker has been also rescheduled to a 
future year. Accordingly, the FY 
1967 program now includes eight fleet 
support ships: two ammunition, one 
combat stores, two replenishment fleet 
oilers, two salvage tugs and one fleet 
ocean tug. 

Other Navy Aircraft 

The Navy will gradually reduce the 
number of Fleet Tactical Support 
Aircraft during the FY 1967-71 pe- 
riod, as more capable aircraft enter 
the force. . . . We will continue our 
program for modernizing the "car- 
rier-onboard delivery" aircraft force, 
replacing older C-l's in the Fleet Tac- 
tical Support Squadrons with the 
more capable C-2's. Each of the 15 
CVA's and eight CVS's will continue 
to have one C-l directly assigned to 
it. 

Marine Corps Forces 

During the FY 1966-67 period Ma- 
rine Corps active duty strength will 
be increased to about 278,000, com- 
pared with 190,000 at the end of FY 
1966. As I noted earlier, one division 
and several supporting units have 
been added as part of the temporary 
Vietnam augmentation. And, as I 
pointed out earlier, the reserve di- 
vision/aircraft wing team is being- 
provided additional personnel to in- 
crease its readiness for quick deploy- 
ment. 



At the end of the current fiscal 
year, the three active Marine aircraft 
wings will have about 1,200 combat 
and combat support aircraft. Over the 
next few years all of the older fight- 
ers will be replaced by F-4's armed 
with Sidewinder and Sparrow air-to- 
air missiles. The Marine Corps attack 
aircraft capability will continue to be 
improved with all weather A-6 air- 
craft replacing visual attack A-4's. 

Although the number of reconnais- 
sance and countermeasure aircraft 
will remain level, the overall capa- 
bility will increase significantly as a 
new and much more effective counter- 
measure aircraft, the EA-fiB, is intro- 
duced to replace the older and less 
effective EF-10B. 

The tanker-transport forces are 
about the same as I presented last 
year. With respect to helicopters, 
some temporary transport squadrons 
will be added in FY 1967, and begin- 
ning in that year, the older CH-37's 
and UH-34's will be replaced with 
new CH-53's and CH-4G's at a faster 
rate than contemplated last year in 
order to provide for combat attrition 
in Vietnam and free additional air- 
craft to equip the reserve aircraft 
wing. The number of light helicopter/ 
observation aircraft will increase in 
FY 1967, reflecting the activation of 
two new squadrons and the introduc- 
tion of the OV-10. . . . 

Navy and Marine Corps Aircraft Pro- 
curement 

To continue the modernization of 
the forces and provide for combat at- 
trition in Vietnam, we now propose to 
increase the FY 19G6 procurement pro- 
gram to a total of 1,129 aircraft and 
buy another 620 aircraft in FY 1967. 
... In effect, therefore, we have al- 
ready started the procurement of 
these additional aircraft; and the 
funds required to complete this fin- 
ancing are included in the FY 1966 
supplemental request, raising the 
total for this year to $2,231 million. 
The proposed FY 1967 aircraft pro- 
curement program would cost $900 
million. 

In the fighter category, we have 
substantially increased the proposed 
FY 1966 procurement program for F- 
4'a over that planned a year ago. 
However, as I noted last year, we en- 
countered a numbei' of problems in the 
development of the Phoenix missile 
and the airborne missile control sys- 
tem for the F-111B. These problems 
have not as yet been fully resolved 
and some delay in the F-111B pro- 
gram appears inevitable. 

In order to provide for attrition in 
Vietnam and continue the moderniza- 
tion of the Navy and Marine Corps 
attack forces, we now propose to buy 
significantly more attack-type air- 



craft in FY 1966 than planned last 
year and another large quantity in 
FY 1967. Included in the FY 1966 
program are additional A-4E's, fin- 
anced in the supplemental. Although 
the last procurement of these aircraft 
was made in FY 1964, the TA-4E, a 
trainer version of the A-4E (which I 
will discuss later), is still in produc- 
tion. We also propose to increase the 
FY 1966 procurement quantities of 
the A-6A and the A-7A. 

Another large quantity of tbe latter 
is included in the FY 1967 budget. 
Also, the first procurement of 100 
OV-10's (COIN-LARA) for the Ma- 
rine Corps is scheduled in FY 1967. 
As noted earlier, we propose to initi- 
ate the development of a new elec- 
tronic countermeasure aircraft, the 
EA-CB, and fund the first increment 
in FY 1966. 

I pointed out last year that we had 
encountered difficulties in the develop- 
ment of the radar for the E-2A fleet 
early warning aircraft. Although 
these problems have been overcome to 
some extent, we do not now plan to 
buy any more of these aircraft, be- 
yond those funded in FY 1966. Suffi- 
cient aircraft will be available to 
provide for each of the 12 attack 
carrier wings. The FY 1966 procure- 
ment of S-2E carrier search aircraft 
will be reduced slightly, reflecting the 
reduction of one CVS. 

The helicopter program is essentially 
the same as I presented last year 
except that we have increased the 
number to be procured in FY 1966-67, 
partly to provide for attrition in 
Vietnam and partly to release more 
helicopters to the Marine Corps Re- 
serve aircraft wing. We now plan to 
buy more CH~46A's and CH-B3A's 
than previously planned. Our request 
includes sufficient funds to install the 
new Integrated Helicopter Avionics 
System (IHAS) on most of the CH~ 
46's, . . . 

To provide for increased pilot 
training in support of the Vietnam 
operation and free some more A-4's 
for the operating forces, we are in- 
creasing our FY 1966 procurement of 



the TA-4E. These additional TA- 
4E's will be assigned to the Combat 
Readiness Air Wings (CRAW's) and 
to the Marines. 

Other Navy Procurement. 

The Navy's logistics objective for 
FY 1967 is essentially the same as 
last year, namely, to acquire sufficient 
stocks to support combat consumption 
for a sustained period, with an aver- 
age of two-thirds of the force com- 
mitted. More specifically, we propose 
to provide ship fills and combat eon- 
sumption stocks for the active Fleet 
and the high-readiness reserve ships 
(Category Alpba). In addition, we 
propose to provide ship fills, phis 
combat consumption stocks for one- 
third of the other selected reserve 
(Category Bravo) ships. Anti-aircraft 
missile requirements are based on 
estimates of enemy aircraft that 
might have to be engaged. 

With respect to attack carrier nmi 
Marine Corps' aviation, comparable 
logistic standards have heen uatnh- 
lished. However, we have increased 
the planned attack sortie rates for 
which ordnance must be procured, by 
about 24 percent. 

To achieve these materiel objectives 
and provide for combat consumption 
in Southeast Asia through FY 1967, 
we are requesting about $1,832 million 
for Navy missiles, ordnance, ammuni- 
tion and other combat consumables; 
$474 million in the FY I960 supple- 
mental, and $1,358 million in the FY 
1967 budget. With this supplemental, 
the amount provided for FY Iflfltf 
would total $1,192 million compared 
with $670 million for FY 1906. 

The largest increases, compared 
with last year, are in air- to-R round 
ordnance, reflecting the consumption 
requirements in Southeast Asia and 
the expanded logistics objectives. For 
example, more Bullpup B missiles 
have been added to the FY 1060 pro- 
gram and the total number of MK-S2 
bombs to be procured has been in- 
creased significantly. Included In the 
FY 1967 program are large quantities 
of MK-81 and MK-82 bombs, ns well 




Navy A7A Corsair. 



CH-46A Helicopter Lands Troops, 



16 



March 196< 



as the new Walleye television-guided 
glide bombs. 

As I pointed out in previous 
years, one of our most pressing needs 
in the ASW area is more modern 
torpedoes. Last year we requested 
funds to buy a large quantity of the 
MK-46 lightweight ASW torpedo. 
This torpedo is much more effective 
against high speed, deep diving, 
nuclear-powered submarines than the 
MK-44 which it is replacing; and it 
can be launched by surface ships 
(tubes and ASROC) and by aircraft 
(helicopters and fixed-wing). For PY 
1967, we propose to buy another large 
quantity of these torpedoes. 

The first increment of MK-48 tor- 
pedoes for operational evaluation was 
funded in FY l!)G(i. ... We will begin 
procurement toward our inventory ob- 
jective in FY 1907. 

Funds are also included in the FY 
19G7 budget for Julie and Jezebel 
sonobuoys as well as more 3-inch 
and 5-inch shells and 5-inch rockets 
to replace consumption in Southeast 
Asia and to continue the buildup oT 
our stocks of these rounds. 
Marine Corps Procurement. 

Our logistics objective for the 
Marine Corps ground forces is to pro- 
vide sufficient materiel to equip five 
divisions and sustain a force of four 
divisions in combat for a sustained 
period with five-sixths of the force 
committed. For the Marine Corps air- 
craft wings, we are providing equip- 
ment for four wings (one reserve) 
and sufficient materiel to support four 
wings in combat for a sustained period 
with two-thirds of the force com- 
mitted. 

A total of $791 million is now esti- 
mated for Marine Corps procurement 
in FY 19G6, of which $517 million is 
included in the supplemental request. 
For FY 1967, $228 million is re- 
quested. A large portion ($338 mil- 
lion) of the additional funds requested 
for FY 1968 is for procurement of 
ammunition and ordnance equipment. 
In FY 19G7, we propose to procure 
about $130 million of such materiel. 

For the procurement of support 
vehicles the FY 196G supplemental 



includes about $fiO million and another 
$41 million is included in the FY 19fi7 
budget. A large portion of the FY 
19G6 supplemental amount is for the 
procurement of vehicles for the new 
Marine Division. 

In the electronics category, the 
Marine Corps will buy, in FY 19G7, a 
variety of radar, radio and other 
communications and electronic gear, 
at a cost of $72 million, including 
equipment for the Marine Tactical 
Data System, the Field Surveillance 
Radar AN/PPS-G (a single-man pack 
radar which replaces a five-man pack 
radar) , Multi-Channel Terminal 
Equipment which adds additional ca- 
pacity to existing radios, etc. An 
additional $43 million has been in- 
cluded in the FY 1966 supplemental 
budget for electronic gear. 

Air Force General Purpose 
Forces 

During the past year, we have con- 
tinued our program of studies to 
determine the proper size and compo- 
sition of the tactical aircraft forces. 
The results of these studies, combined 
with the impact of the conflict in 
Southeast Asia, are the source of 
several recommendations for change in 
the Air Force General Purpose Forces 
at this time. 

Tactical Fighters. 

We are still programming a tactical 
fighter force of 24 wings essentially 
the same size force planned a year 
ago. However, there are a number of 
changes within the force structure and 
procurement programs that we now 
believe should be made, For the short 
run, we want to; (1) replace in the 
active forces the aircraft lost as a 
result of combat in Southeast Asia 
and the higher tempo of operations 
generally; (2) provide for possible 
future attrition which we must now, 
in prudence, anticipate; (3) provide 
for the necessary expansion of the 
training base; and (4) take advan- 
tage of opportunities to improve the 
operational effectiveness of the pres- 
ent force. For the longer run, we 
want to obtain a hotter balance within 



the overall fighter force between 
multi-purpose aircraft which, though 
capable of both air-to-air and air-to- 
ground operations, are necessarily ex- 
pensive, and more specialized aircraft 
which, though designed primarily for 
air-to-ground operations, can be pro- 
cured and operated in larger numbers 
for the same cost. The net result of 
this more efficient mix of the two 
classes of aircraft will be an increase 
in our over.aH tactical air capabilities. 

Accordingly, we now propose to pro- 
cure the A-7 as an attack aircraft for 
the Air Force. . . . 

A year ago we proposed an FY 19GG 
procurement of a sizeable number of 
F-4 aircraft and tentatively planned 
on completing the program in FY 
1967. Now, to replace Southeast Asia 
attrition, to provide for the expanded 
readiness training and rotation base, 
and to increase the size of the force, 
we propose to increase the FY 19(iG 
quantity very substantially and con- 
tinue F-4 procurement in FY 19(37. 

The F-111A procurement schedule 
has been changed slightly from that 
forecasted a year ago in order to ac- 
commodate changes in the F-111B 
program and the decision to procure 
a bomber version of the aircraft. For 
FY 1967, we now propose to procure 
a few more than planned a year ago. 
The number scheduled for procure- 
ment in the subsequent years has been 
adjusted to the new force goal (re- 
flecting the proposed procurement of 
a force of 210 dual purpose FB- 
lllA's) as well as the expanded 
readiness training and rotation base. 
Tactical Reconnaissance Forces, 

The size of the tactical reconnais- 
sance force presently scheduled for 
the FY 1967-71 period is essentially 
the same as recommended a year ago. 
However, anticipated attrition in 
Vietnam, together with increased 
training requirements, is expected to 
reduce the number of RF-101's avail- 
able for the operating forces. This 
shortfall will be made up, initially, 
by retaining more of the RB-Gfi'a and, 
eventually, by additional IlF-4'a from 
new production. Another increment 
of RF~4's have been included in the 




U,S. Marine Corp A6A Jet Aircraft, 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



U.S. Air Force RF-4C Aircraft. 



U.S. Air Force F-111A. 



17 



FY 1967 program and more are 
planned for the future. . . . 

As a possible future replacement 
for the presently planned reconnais- 
sance aircraft, we now propose to de- 
velop a reconnaissance version of the 
F-lll. This development will be de- 
signed to minimize the number of 
changes in the aircraft's present con- 
figuration and is estimated to coat $50 
million, of which $12.5 million is to be 
programmed from available funds in 
PY I960 and $12.5 is requested in the 
FY 1967 budget. No production de- 
cision on this aircraft is required at 
this time. 
Tactical Air Control System (TAGS). 

The Tactical Air Control System 
provides the command and control 
capability for the tactical air com- 
mander in field operations. . . _. ^We 
now propose to pnocure an initial 
quantity of the more capable OV-10 
(formerly the COIN/LARA) aircraft 
in FY 196G, and a large quantity in 
FY 1967 to replace the older 0-1's. 
Special Air Warfare Forces (SA\VF). 

During the last year we have added 
to the Special Air Warefare Forces a 
number of aircraft including U-10's 
and C-47's for psychological warfare 
missions (leaflet dropping, etc.), and 
AC-47 direct fire support aircraft for 
operations in Vietnam. We now plan 
to add still more aircraft to the opera- 
tional forces as well as expand the 
combat crew training capability. 

Advanced Flying Training. 

As previously discussed, we are 
undertaking a substantial expansion 
of the advanced flying training base 
for the active forces, to be accom- 
plished initially by using aircraft pre- 
viously scheduled for transfer to the 
Air National Guard and, later, by 
increased deliveries from new pro- 
curement, The total number of air- 
craft assigned to this role will be 
raised from about 280 at end FY 1965 
to about 500 in the FY 1967-71 period. 

In summary, the Air Force will 
procure a total of 780 tactical, air con- 
trol and reconnaissance aircraft for 
the General Purpose Forces in FY 
19(56, at a total cost of $2,175 million. 
(Of this total, 479 aircraft costing 
$767 million are included in the FY 
1966 supplemental request.) For FY 
1967, 485 aircraft costing $1,672 mil- 



lion are requested for these forces. 
Other Air Force Procurement. 

For the past several years our 
logistic objective for the Air Force 
General Purpose Forces has been to 
have sufficient stocks to support a 
sustained period of combat consump- 
tion with an optimum balance of sup- 
plies for all forces engaged. 

The Air Force's aircraft non-nu- 
clear ordnance program for FY 1966 
totals $1,359 million, of which $738 
million is included in the supplemental 
request. The proposed FY 1967 pro- 
gram totals $1,780 million. Except in 
those few cases where existing pro- 
duction capacity makes it impossible, 
this combined FY 1966-67 funding- 
will fully meet the revised inventory 
objectives as well as provide for all 
projected combat consumption in 
Southeast Asia. 

Among the principal items in our 
program for these two years are large 
quantities of "iron bombs" used by 
our forces (especially B-62's) in 
Southeast Asia. (In total, $824 million 
has been included in the FY 1966-67 
budgets for these types of bombs.) 
Large sums are also provided for 
napalm bombs, 2.75-inch rockets, 
20mm ammunition, Bullpup missiles 
for the CBU and other cannister 
bombs. We also propose to procure for 
the Air Force substantial quantities 
of sophisticated special purpose weap- 
onsWalleye, Rockeye, Sadeye, and 
the Shrike anti-radar missile. 
Theater Airbase Vulnerability. 

For. some time we have been con- 
cerned about the vulnerability of our 
overseas tactical airbases and of the 
aircraft on them to non-nuclear at- 
tack. During the past year, a special 
Air Force team has made an extensive 
analysis of the entire problem of air- 
base vulnerability how bad it is, 
what can be done about it, and what 
the benefit of vulnerability-reducing 
measures would be. ... 

We have included about $26 million 
in the FY 1967 budget to get this 
program under way. While its total 
cost is still to be worked out, I cpn 
assure you that it will be but a frac- 
tion of the value of the aircraft alone 
which would be otherwise lost in an 
attack on our air bases. Few, if any, 
other areas in our tactical air pro- 
gram offer so great a potential return 



on the investment. For the past three 
years, the Congress has denied our 
budget requests for tactical aircraft 
shelters. In view of the seriousness 
of the vulnerability problem I must 
once again urge your favorable con- 
sideration of this program in our FY 
1967 budget request. 

Tactical Exercises. 

In peacetime, tactical exercises help 
the General Purpose Forces to main- 
tain a high state of combat readiness, 
provide opportunities to practice close 
coordination among the Services and! 
with allied forces, and furnish a re- 
alistic testing environment for now 
concepts and weapon systems. How- 
ever, beginning in FY 1965, the puce 
of larger scale exercises directed mid 
coordinated by the Joint Chiefs of Stuff 
has slowed down with our increiis- 
ing involvement in Southeast Asia, 
Many of the purposes of these exer- 
cises are, of course, regularly accom- 
plished in the course of preparing 
deploying and actually engnging our 
forces in Vietnam. For that reason, 
the cost of such exercises in FY 19GB 
totaled $42 million compared with 
$110 million estimated a year ago; 
and the current year's program IH 
estimated at only $28 million coin- 
pared with $131 million included in 
our original request. On the assump- 
tion that the situation in Vietnam 
will continue to require substiuitinl 
U.S. military participation, the tenta- 
tive FY 1967 program lias been act 
at $00 million. The actual conduct of 
the program will be decided as events 
unfold. " 

In addition to these larger JOS 
directed and coordinated exercises, the 

Services will continue to conduct 
training and readiness exercises, in- 
cluding a number with elements of 
allied military establishments. 

Financial Summary 

The General Purpose Forces Pro- 
gram, which I have outlined n1)t>vc, 
will require total obligation a 1 author- 
ity of $30.0 billion in FY 190G, of 
which $8.8 billion is included in the 
supplemental request, nnd $25.7 bil- 
lion for FY 1967. A comparison with 
prior years is shown below: 



($ Billions Fiscal 


Year) 






Total Obligational Authority 


1962 1962 
Original Final 


1963 
Actual 


1964 
Actual 


1966 
Actual 


1966 
Est. 


Prop'd 

$26.7 


$14.6 $17.R 


$17.6 


$17,7 


$19.0 


$80.0 



18 



March 



Included in this program are the 
Military Airlift Command transports, 
the Air Force's Tactical Air Com- 
mand troop carrier aircraft, the 
transport and troop carrier aircraft 
in the Air Force's reserve compo- 
nents, and the troop ships, cargo 
ships, tankers and "forward mobile 
depot" ships operated by the Military 
Sea Transport Service. 

I believe it is apparent from my 
discussion of the limited war problem 
and our General Purpose Force re- 
quirements that an adequate airlift/ 
soalift capability is essential to our 
global strategy in the collective de- 
fense of the Free World. As I have 
pointed out in previous years, there 
are at least four ways in which a 
quick-reaction capability can he 
achieved : 

Military forces can be deployed, 
in advance, to potential trouble areas, 

Equipment and supplies can be 
prepositioned in those areas mid 
military personnel airlifted in as re- 
quired. 

Equipment and supplies can be 
stored aboard ships deployed near 
potential trouble spots, again with 
the men airlifted in as needed. 

o Both men and equipment can be 
held in a central reserve in the 
United States and deployed by air- 
lift and sealift as required. 

Each of those methods has its own 
advantages and disadvantages. For 
example, while the. propositioning of 
our forces overseas probably provides 
the fastest response capability and 
reduces the need for airlift and sea- 
lift, -it also introduces a greater de- 
gree of rigidity into our military pos- 
ture by committing forces in advance. 
Moreover, this approach increases our 
overall requirement for men, materiel 
and foreign bases and involves tint 
operational uncertainties and diplo- 
matic difficulties which often arise 
from such semi-permanent overseas 
deployment; it also increases defense 
expenditures abroad. 

In contrast, a central reserve of 
mobile General Purpose Forces in the 
United States, ready for immediate 
deployment provides considerably 
more operational flexibility and does 
not require as big an overseas mili- 
tary establishment as does a strategy 
which relies on such geographically 
dispersed forces. However, timely 
deployment from a central reserve 
requires very large strategic airlift 
and sealift forces readily available 
at all times. 



The prepositioning of equipment 
and supplies overseas either in land- 
based or sea-based depots is some- 
thing of a compromise between the 
two extremes. This approach to the 
problem of quick response, while 
economising on manpower, requires 
larger stocks of supplies, and some 
manpower, since such stocks must be 
maintained at each overseas proposi- 
tioning site. And, of course, we must 
also have the airlift needed to move 
the men to where they can be joined 
with the materiel. However, our 
capacity to move men is far greater 
than our capacity to move equipment 
and supplies, and for this reason, 
prepositioning has proven very attrac- 
tive in certain situations during the 
past few years, especially in the case 
of very heavy and very bulky equip- 
ment. 

Prepositioning on land, although 
necessary in many instances, involves 
in addition many of the same prob- 
lems encountered in deploying large 
forces in foreign countries, Restric- 
tions imposed by the host country 
could, in some cases, affect the avail- 
ability of the stocks and thereby limit 
our own freedom of action, Moreover, 
maintaining the materiel overseas in 
a ready-to-uso condition can be quite 
costly, and almost always involves 
substantial foreign exchange outlays. 
Also, in places such as Southeast 
Asia, the costs of maintaining certain 
typos of equipment which arc espe- 
cially susceptible to deterioration in 
hot and humid climates can be quite 
high. 



It was these factors, in particular, 
which led us to view with favor the 
so-called "floating depot" concept 
which we have developed and ex- 
panded over the last few years. By 
loading the equipment and supplies 
aboard ships in which the tempera- 
ture and humidity can be controlled 
and by stationing these ships in Far 
East waters, we are able to move the 
materiel to any part of that area in 
a matter of just a few days. And 
the troops can be moved by air well 
within the time those ships requii'e to 
get to their destinations. . . . 

From that time on we have each 
year consistently raised our goals 
both with regard to the airlift and the 
sealift. We arc now proposing an ex- 
panded airlift program which will 
provide by FY 1973 an equivalent 
30-day lift capability from West 
Coast airfields to Southeast Asia 
more than ten times greater than 
that available in FY 1961, and nearly 
double the goal I talked about last 
year. This increase is to be achieved 
through two major changes in the 
program. 

First, we are now proposing a 
large increase in the C-GA program. 

Second, as I informed the Com- 
mittee lust August when I appeared 
in support of the amendment to the 
FY 1906 budget, we have substan- 
tially increased the planned utiliza- 
tion rates of airlift aircraft by rais- 
ing the manning levels of selected 
units, both active and reserve. . . . 

With respect to the in tra-th eater 
and assault airlift capability, gen- 
erally, we will have by end FY 1967 
:',0 squadrons of C-130's (472 U.E. 
aircraft), over half of which will bi; 
the longer range C-lflOE's. . . , 




Fast Deployment Logistic Ship (FDL). 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



19 



By end FY 1968 we will have many 
hundreds of C-130's and C-141's in 
the active forces. . . . 

In addition, the Air Force will 
shortly begin a program to modify 
the C-123 aircraft, now assigned to 
the Special Air Warfare Forces, with 
jet engines and anti-skid brakes. . . . 

The C-124 provides a limited but 
valuable tactical airlift capability. . . . 

Later, as the new C-5A's are deliv- 
ered to the active forces, a large 
number of C-130's will be trans- 
ferred to the reserve forces to re- 
place the C-124's. 

Over and above these programs, 
we are re-examining the entire prob- 
lem of "retail" airlift within the 
theater. It is clear that an efficient 
mix of tactical airlift aircraft must be 
available to assure that our deployed 
forces can be promptly committed to 
combat once they deploy to the 
theater of operations. Exactly what 
this mix of aircraft should be, how- 
ever, is still not clear. Therefore, the 
Services are undertaking a compre- 
hensive study of our tactical airlift 
requirements for the longer term. 

With regard to sealift, we are con- 
tinuing to concentrate our attention 
on the special purpose ships, increas- 
ing the number of Victory class for- 
ward mobile depot ships and adding 
more Fast Deployment Logistic 
(FDL) ships to the program. 

The ultimate number of FDL ships 
to be constructed is yet to be deter- 
mined. However, it is clear from our 
experience over the last six months 
that in a limited war it may be desir- 
able to supplement the U.S. Merchant 
Marine with DOD special purpose 
shipping. 

Til a general war there is no ques- 
tion that we can commandeer for mili- 
tary purposes all of U.S. Flag ship- 
ping, if required. But, in a limited 
war the situation is never as clear 
cut, particularly in the kind of mili- 
tary operation we are now supporting 
in Southeast Asia. Yet this is pre- 
cisely the kind of situation we are 
most likely to confront in the years 
ahead. 

Even last year I pointed out to the 
Committee that, while we depend very 



heavily on the Merchant Marine for 
our sealift, it takes time to assemble 
the ships and load them. Therefore, if 
we want a capability to deploy large 
forces rapidly to distant areas, we 
need both additional airlift and im- 
mediately available fast sealift. Our 
immediate problem of sealift in sup- 
port of. our effort in Southeast Asia 
is being solved by reactivating addi- 
tional National Defense Reserve Fleet 
ships and by using whatever other 
shipping is available, with first prior- 
ity for U,S. Flag vessels. Already 
we have reactivated 58 ships from the 
Reserve Fleet, and more will be re- 
activated over- the next few month)-). 
These ships, together with the MSTS 
nucleus fleet and other available pri- 
vate shipping, should be sufficient to 
meet all of our requirements as we 
see them now. If these requirements 
should increase, we still have a rela- 
tively large number of suitable ships 
in the Reserve Fleet which could be 
reactivated. And, of course, there are 
some ships in the U.S. Merchant 
Marine we haven't used and some 
4,500 ships of other friendly nations 
we haven't called upon. 

Airlift 

. . . Funds for the procurement 
of the -first eight C-5A aircraft are 
included in the FY 1967 Budget. The 
first large procurement will bo made 
in FY 1968. . . . 

The C-141 program which we pre- 
sented here a year ago envisioned an 
ultimate 13 squadron force (208 
U.E. aircraft), a FY 1966 procure- 
ment of 84 aircraft and a final FY 
1967 buy of 31 

Sealift 

As previously mentioned, wo plan 
to proceed with the construction of a 
fleet of Fast Deployment Logistic 
ships. Last year we requested funds 
for four of these ships and tentatively 
scheduled the procurement of more in 
subsequent years, Although Congress 
funded only two of these ships in the 
FY 1966 budget, all of our analyses 
during the pasj year confirm their 
value to the sealift force. Therefore, 
we have tentatively scheduled tho 
construction of additional ships in 



the FY 1968-71 period. However, 
propose to build these ships un 
much tho same kind of "total pa 
age" contracting procedure used : 
the C-<5A. Our schedule calls foi 
contract definition competition in ni 
FY 1967 with contractor select! 
and award of the two FY lf)6fi sti 
coming in tho. spring: of 19fi7. Gons 
ering the length of time necessary 
makes this selection and get prodi 
tion facilities and procedures orgi 
i'/ed, we have decided to defer furtl 
procurement of theso ships until ] 
1968, However, $10 million in reseai 
and development funds will be nccc 
to initiate contract definition a 
these funds are included in tho 1 
1966 supplemental. . . . 

The throe Victory-class cargo ahi 
which were converted to forwa 
mobile; depots in FY liKiU an; pn 
ently deployed around Siibic Buy 
tho Philippines. Last year wo tenl 
tively planned on converting more 
theso Victory ships with tho ent 
force to be operational liy end E 
1.9(57. Wo now plan to increase tfi 
force by about ton percent. The 
ships will be phased out when t 
now fast deployment logistic all! 
become available for this role. . . , 

One shallow draft tanker, especial 
suited for operations in Southed 
Asia, hafi boon activated this yet 
raising the total tanker force to \ 
Wo propose to keep the tanker for 
at this level over tho next few ycai 
The program which wo began in F 
19(55 of rehabilitating and lengtheni! 
the MSTS tankers built duriiiR; Wor 
War II will be continued, Funds fi 
modernising four of theso ships we 
provided in tho FY IOfi6-GQ budg 
and additional funds arc requested i 
two more in FY 1007. Wo arc al 
studying the desirability of rep tacit 
some of these older tankers with tic 
ships. . . . 

Financial Summary 

Tho Airlift and Sealift Forces 
have outlined will require Total Obi 
gational Authority of $2.2 billion : 
FY 1966, of which $0.6 billion . 
included in the supplemental reques 
and $2.1 billion in FY l)S7. A cor 
parison with prior years is shoia 
below ; 



($ Billions, Fiscal Years) 




1962 
Orig, 


1962 
Final 


1963 
Actual 


1964 
Actual 


1966 
Actual 


1966 

Est 


1067 
Proposed : 


Total Obligational 
















Authority 


.9 


1.2 


1.8 


1.2 


1.5 


2.2 


2.1 



20 



March 



Included in this major program 
are all the research and development 
efforts not directly identified with 
weapons or weapon systems approved 
for deployment. 

We have made a special effort this 
year not only to cull out any mar- 
ginal projects in the FY 196(5 and 
1%7 research and development pro- 
grams, but also to defer to future 
years all projects whose postpone- 
ment would not have a seriously ad- 
verso effect on our future military 
capabilities. But even while we have 
eliminated, reduced and deferred proj- 
ects in some areas of this program, 
we have had to add, incicase and 
accelerate projects in other areas to 
meet newly recognized urgent re- 
quirements. . . . 

Before T turn to the specifics of 
the PY 19f!7 "Research and Develop- 
ment program, there arc two gen- 
eral areas which might usefully he 
discussed as entities rather than in 
terms of the separate projects which 
they comprise. These are nuclear test- 
ing and tost detection, and the space 
development projects. 

Nuclear Testing and 
Test Detection 

. . . The Defense Department, in 
cooperation with the Atomic Energy 
Commission (AEG), is committed to 
four specific safeguards with relation 
to the Test Han Treaty. For the De- 
fense Department's portion of this 
program, we have budgeted a total of 
$239 million for PY 1907, compared 
with $241 million in PY 19fifi and 
about $250 million in PY 19GB. 

Tn support of the first safeguard 

the underground test program we 

have included $28.5 million in the 

PY 19fi7 budget, compared to $30.0 

million in FY 19flfl. . . , 

In support of the second safeguard 
maintenance of modern nuclear 
laboratory facilities and programs in 
theoretical and exploratory nuclear 
technology our FY 1967 budget in- 
cludes $53 million. . . . 

About $UI> million has been included 
in the FY 1967 budget in support of 
the third safeguard the maintenance 
of a stand-by atmospheric test ca- 
pability. . , , 

In support of the fourth safeguard 
j the monitoring of Sino-Soviet nu- 
! clear activities wo have included a 
total of $122.2 million in the FY 1967 
-t budget, compared with $113.6 million 
in PY 1966 and $111.9 million in FY 
1965. We conduct two principal pro- 
grams to support this safeguard 
the Advanced Research Projects 
Agency's Vel a program and the 



Atomic Energy Detection System 
(AEDS). 

The Vela program is directed to 
the development and demonstration 
of an advanced surveillance system 
for detecting, locating and identifying 
nuclear tests underground, under- 
water, in the atmosphere and at high 
altitudes in space. . . . Approximately 
$8 million has been included in. the 
PY 1967 program for the space por- 
tion of the Vela program. 

The Vela underground test detec- 
tion program is also progressing very 
well and another $32 million has been 
included in the FY 1967 program for 
the space portion of the Vela pro- 
gram. 

The- Vela underground tost detec- 
tion program is also progressing very 
well and another $32 million has been 
included in the PY 1967 budget to 
continue this work. The construction 
of a Large Aperture Seismic Array 
(LAS A) was completed last year in 
eastern Montana. . . . Wo have also 
included $10 million in the PY 1967 
budget for preliminary work on other 
LASA arrays, but these funds will 
not be committed until the effective- 
ness of the Montana LASA system 
is fully evaluated. . . . 

Space Development Projects 

While the various elements of the 
Defense Department's space effort are 
spread, on a functional basis, through- 
out the program and budget struct- 
tures, I believe this effort can be 
more moaning Cully discussed as a 
separate entity. 

Again, I want to remind you that 
the Defense space program is an in- 
tegral part of the much larger Na- 
tional Space Program, expenditures 
for which now total over $7 billion 
a year. The Defense portion of this 
national program is designed (1) to 
explore the space environment for 
military purposes, ,(2) to complement 
the work of NASA and other Govern- 
ment agencies in those fields in which 
the Defense Department has already 
achieved a high degree of technical 
competence and (3) to explore the 
usefulness of manned apace systems 
for military purposes. . . . 

Accordingly, from the outset, I 
have laid down two fundamental cri- 
teria which the Defense space effort 
must meet, First, it must mesh with 
the efforts of NASA in all vital areas, 
i.e., the Defense and NASA programs 
taken together must constitute a sin- 
gle, integrated national program. Sec- 
ond, projects supported by the De- 
fense Department .must hold the 
distinct promise of enhancing our 



military power and effectiveness. . . . 
In total, about 1,621 million of 
our FY 1967 budget request is for 
the space program, slightly less than 
in FY 1966. 

Spacecraft Mission Projects. 

The largest space mission projed. 
in terms of total program cost is the 
Manned Orbital Laboratory (MOL). 
Last year I described four courses of 
action which we planned to tako pru- 
liminary to a final decision on pro- 
ceeding with this program. Briefly 
they were as follows: 

The Air Force was to define mi 
experimental program to meet the 
broadened military objectives of MOL, 
placing emphasis on developments 
which might lead to operational Hyn- 
terns. The Air Force was also to de- 
termine the essential vehicle charac- 
teristics required to meet those 
objectives and, in cooperation with 
NASA, was to define any additional 
significant experiments of a general 
scientific and technological nature 
which should be carried out. 

The Air Force was to assess the 
proposed specifications of a MOL 
system, i.e., the Gemini B vehicle, 
the laboratory section and the Titan 
IIIC booster, against tho needs of 
the experimental program. Three pre- 
liminary design studies were to 1m 
initiated with industry to provide tin 1 
cost and technical information needed 
to select the final configuration. Tho 
Air Force was also to examine vari- 
ous configurations of the Apollo sys- 
tem that were being studied by NASA 
to meet its own objectives. 

To preserve the option of prin'.iH'd- 
ing with MOL on an orderly lmnlii 
ftid to make effective use of the 
Titan III R&D flight program, nc,~, 
tion was to be taken to qualify com- 
ponents of the Gemini B plus lab- 
oratory configuration aboard Titan 
IIIC approved development vehicle. 
(No men were to be carried on tluiHO 
nights.) 

One hundred and fifty million dol- 
lars was to be included in tho FY 
1966 budget for continuing design 
studies, narrowing the effort to two 
contractors for program definition 
and to a single contractor for sub- 
sequent full-scale development. Til-; 
study contractors wore to be selected 
on the basis of their ability to ox- 
ecute development, whether the up- 
proach finally selected was tlui 
Gemini B or a version, of the Apollo 
system. No FY 1986 funds were to 
bo obligated until we were convinced 
that a satisfactory approach had linen 
found, and that the expected rcsullH 
of the program would be commensur- 
ate with tho cost. 

The actions (including the provi- 
sion of $150 million in FY 196G) wero 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



carried forward during the spring 
and summer of last year and after a 
thorough discussion of the MOL proj- 
ect with the Space Council, the Presi- 
dent on August 25th decided to pro- 
ceed with its development at an 
estimated cost of about $1.5 billion. 

NASA will study the MOL to de- 
termine the feasibility of using it 
for experiments of a general scientific 
and technological nature. The Air 
Force will attempt to accommodate 
these experiments wherever possible 
as long as they do not seriously inter- 
fere with the military objectives. As 
in the past, NASA and DOD will con- 
tinue to work closely to ensure that 
the manned space flight effort of both 
agencies is fully coordinated and that 
the program is integrated with the 
national effort. . . . 

We intend that the MOL develop- 
ment program should proceed on a 
deliberate and orderly schedule, using 
the $160 million provided for FY 1966 
and the $1E9 million requested for 
FY 1967. Design definition, system 
integration, development of specifica- 
tions and determination of firm cost 
proposals are scheduled for comple- 
tion during this coming spring and 
summer, after which contracts will be 
awarded for the full-scale develop- 
ment of hardware. 

The next item, Gemini (Manned 
Space Plig'nt), represents the Defense 
Department's participation in the 
NASA-Gemini program. The $2 mil- 
lion provided for FY 1966 will com- 
plete the remaining military experi- 
ments planned through the end of 
this calendar year, , . . 

A total of $G2 million is requested 
in FY 1967 to continue work on De- 
fense satellite communications devel- 
opment programs, which I described 
to you some detail last year. . . , 

Vehicle, Engine and Component De- 
velopments. 

The largest project in this category 
is still the Titan III development, for 
which about $66 million is requested 
in FY 1967. . . . 

The current principal effort under 
the START (Space Technology and 
Advanced Re-entry Tests) program is 
project Prime, for which we included 
$16 million in the FY 1967 bud- 
get. . . . 

The $2 million requested for Ad- 
vanced Space Guidance is to sup- 
port four major tasks: definition of 
guidance and control requirements for 
advanced manned orbiting systems 
and re-entry spacecraft and concept- 
ual development of techniques and 
components to support these require- 
ments; investigation of horizon sens- 
ing techniques and sensors to estab- 
lish capabilities for precision space 
navigation; investigation of star 
tracking techniques and sensors to 



determine space capabilities and lim- 
itations; study of known and un- 
known landmark tracking for auto- 
nomous space navigation. 

The $2 million included in the FY 
1967 budget for Solid Rocket Engine 
Development is for the continuation 
of studies in large solid motors for 
future ballistic missile and space 
launch vehicles. . . . 

Two years ago we initiated a new 
liquid rocket engine program, de- 
signed to demonstrate the feasibility 
of the modular approach to large 
rocket engine development. ... A 
sum of $15 million is required for 
this program in FY 1967. 

Other Defense Activities Supporting 
the Space Program. 

The Ground Support category in- 
cludes the prorated cost of the mis- 
sile ranges and test instrumentation 
as well as the satellite detection and 
tracking systems. The largest item 
in this category is the $134 million 
for the Eastern Test Range. 

The next largest item is the ground 
based system for satellite detection, 
tracking and control Spacetrack 
(USAF) and SPASUR (Navy). . , . 
The FY 1967 budget includes $33 
million for Spacetrack and $6 million 
for SPASUR. 

The $59 million requested for Satel- 
lite Control Facilities will continue 
the modernization and improvement 
of the existing network of six per- 
manent tracking stations and one 
control center and provide for the 
construction of a new permanent 
tracking station on Guam to replace 
the temporary mobile unit now being 
used there. . . . 

Research 

. . . for FY 1967, we are asking a 
total of ,$417 million. This is about 
$27 million more than the $390 mil- 
lion available for FY 19fi6 with most 
of the increase ($18 million) devoted 
to the new "University Program". As 
T informed the Committee last year, 
the Executive Branch under the lead- 
ership of the President's Office of 
Science and Technology lias under- 
taken a program to develop centers 
of technical excellence in all parts of 



the country, for both civilian and mili- 
tary purposes. The concentration of tf~ 
the Government's research effort in 
a relatively small number of Ihc 
larger universities has been a matter 
of concern for many years. The new 
University Program will seek to 
broaden the research base by help- 
ing other institutions participate in 
the effort. With regard to the De- 
fense portion of this prog-ram, we 
plan to take the initiative- and sys- 
tematically visit those universities 
which have not as yet had the op- 
portunity to bid for Defense research 
work. In the course of those visits, 
we hope to help these institutions de- 
termine their capabilities and inform 
them on how to prepare pi'ojKiHiils. 
This new effort should help Imindcn 
the research base and enable the 
Government to tap the full potential 
of the Nation's existing capabilities 
in this area. 

Defense research in the Kn^iiiooriiiE 
Sciences, for which we are requsthitf 
a total of $119 million in FY 1DR7, 
is directed primarily toward the solu- 
tion of problems anticipated in the 
development of hardware for future 
operational systems. 

Electronics research ($28 million) 
is concerned with the discovery of 
new concepts and techniques for Uie 
development of electronic devices. , . . 

Materials research ($47 million) is 
directed toward the development of 
new compounds, composite struct iii'eF, 
plastics and alloys. . . , 

Mechanics research ($29 million) 
investigates the behavior of .struc- 
tures and machines under static ami 
dynamic loads. . . , 

Energy conversion ($lfi million} 
studies try to improve thornwifilrclric 
and solar energy devices. . . , 

Research in the Physical Sciences, 

for which we are requesting !)5 mil- 
lion Tor FY 1907, advances our under- , 
standing of natural phenomena, Sutli 
progress is fundamental to nil other 
research. 

General physics ($30 million) con- 
centrates on the classical fields nf 
optics, thermodynamics, and statis- 
tical mechanics. . . . 




USAF Manned Orbiting Laboratory. 



Air Force Titan III-C. 



22 



March 1966 



o Nuclear physics ($16 million) is 
concerned with both nuclear struc- 
ture and cosmic ray propagation. . . . 

Defense research in chemistry ($11 
million) is devoted particularly to the 
synthesis of new compounds and ma- 
terials. . . . 

Mathematics research ($38 mil- 
lion) develops now methods of calcu- 
lating and representing natural phe- 
nomena. . , . 

Environmental Sciences, for which 

we are requesting about $57 million, 
investigate the earth, air and sea 
around, in and are increasingly im- 
portant as man extends his domain 
into space and under the sea. 

* Terrestrial sciences ($6 million) 
finpport basic research in seismology, 
geodesy and soil mechanics. . . . 

Atmospheric research ($21 mil- 
lion) investigates the air nearest the 
earth. . . . 

* Astronomy and Astrophysics ($10 
nvllion) are concerned with natural 
phenomena beyond the earth's atmos- 
phere. . . . 

Oceanography ($20 million) ex- 
plores the nature of the sea and maps 
the ocean door, the knowledge of 
which is vital to our undersea war- 
fare effort. . . . 

Ilcscnrch in Biological and Medical 
Sciences, for which we arc requesting 
$34 million, is directed primarily to- 
ward reducing the impact of military 
casualties and to the provision of the 
best possible medical care for mili- 
tary personnel in the field. . . . 

Behavioral mid Social Sciences, for 

which we are requesting $13 million, 
concern the psychological and physi- 
cal factors which influence human 
performance. ... 

The Nuclear Weapons Effects lie- 
search program is managed by the 
Defense Atomic Support Agency 
(DASA) under the general direction 
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the 
Office of the Secretary of Defense. 
The program includes: applied re- 
search in the fields of air blast, nu- 
clear and thermal radiation and bio- 



medical, electromagnetic and other 
military significant effects. . . . 

Exploratory Development 

This is the effort directed toward 
the expansion of technological knowl- 
edge and the development of mate- 
rials, components, devices and sys- 
tems which it is hoped will have some 
useful application to new military 
weapons and equipment. Here the em- 
phasis is on exploring the feasibility 
of various approaches to the solution 
of specific military problems, up to 
the point of demonstrating feasibility 
with a "bread board" device and pro- 
totype components and subsystems. 
Along with Research, Exploratory De- 
velopment forms the pool of tech- 
nical knowledge from which future 
systems will be devised and de- 
signed. . , . 

We are requesting a total of $1,063 
million for Exploratory Development 
in FY 1967, $97 million loss than the 
amount provided in FY 1964. . . . 

Army. 

The Army's Exploratory Develop- 
ment effort is directed to devising 
new means to provide the front line 
soldier with effective close support 
and to protect him against all possible 
forms of enemy attack, A large part 
of the $232 million requested for PY 
1967 will he devoted to techniques or 
equipment directly applicable to front 
line combat with emphasis on com- 
munications and electronics, ordnance 
and medicine. More specifically, this 
work includes: electronic counter- 
countermeasures; radios, antennas 
and survival kits specially adapted to 
operations in tropical jungles; light 
intensifies for night vision devices; 
experimental radars; technology to in- 
crease the capability of combat sur- 
veillance; investigations of new con- 
cepts of boats for assault operations 
and for the emplacement of bridges; 
new vaccines, techniques to treat 
bums and prosthetic devices. 

Somewhat less than one fifth of the 
Army's Exploratory Development 
effort is divided between aeronautics 
and materials. . , , 




Special High Frequency Radio. 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



An Individual Aid and Survival Kit. 



The balance of the Army's program 
is devoted to such projects as the 
development of new support and 
logistics techniques, automated sys- 
tems for compiling maps, and im- 
proved techniques for construction on 
ice caps. The Army will also continue 
to carry out laboratory projects in 
nuclear effects in support of one of 
the safeguards to the limited Nuclear 
Test Ban Treaty. 

Navy. 

The principal Exploratory Develop- 
ment effort of the Navy Sea War- 
fare Systems is directed toward 
achieving better performance in naval 
weapons and equipment. About 40 
percent of the $304 million requested 
for PY 19(57 will be devoted to this 
category. Approximately $80 million 
of tliat amount is for the refinement 
of surveillance and navigation de- 
vices. Nearly $44 million is for the 
development of new design concepts 
for naval vessels, such as the Alba- 
core type of submarine hull; captured 
air bubble ships; bow sonar domes, 
hydrofoil craft and new hulls to pene- 
trato ice more easily. The remainder 
of the Sea Warfare Systems effort 
is directed toward hotter counter- 
measures and logistics. The decrease 
in funds allocated to this category 
in PY 1967 does not reflect a de- 
emphasis of Sea Warfare Systems 
hut rather the maturing of some 
major efforts to the Advanced Devel- 
opment stage. 

Wi th respect to commun ications, 
electronics and ordnance, the Navy 
is especially interested in anti-radia- 
tion missiles which can home on en- 
emy electronic emissions and in the 
development of missiles able to dis- 
criminate between enemy small craft 
and the background radar clutter 
created by waves. The Navy's work 
on aeronautics is concerned with the 
special problems of developing air- 
craft suitable for carrier opera- 
tions. . . . 

Air Force. 

About half of the $316 million re- 
quested for the Air Force's Explora- 
tory Development program in PY 
1967 will be devoted to space investi- 
gations and related projects. This 
emphasis flows naturally from the 
fact that, whereas the problems of 
operating in the atmosphere are rela- 
tively well understood, we are, at this 
time, really "exploring" space. Cur- 
rently, the major effort is directed 
toward achieving better systems for 
controlling missiles in flight. Partic- 
ularly, we are working on inertial 
guidance, spaceborne computer tech- 
niques, navigation sensors, methods 
of identifying targets for missiles 
and terminal guidance. We are trying 

23 



to develop means to make telemetric 
transmissions more secure and to im- 
prove the pumps, nozzles and com- 
bustion chambers of the rocket mo- 
tors. In the area of hioastronautics, 
wo are concerned with designing de- 
vices to sustain life in space and to 
counteract the lethal radiations and 
extremes of heat and pressure found 
in that environment. 

About one sixth of the total Air 
Force's Exploratory Development pro- 
gram will be devoted to the improve- 
ment of surveillance techniques. Par- 
ticular attention will he paid to 
perfecting; our photographic, infrared 
and electronic over-the-horizon capa- 
bilities. 

Finally, the Air Force will continue 
work on such areas as improving the 
arming and fuzing of conventional 
ordnance, better lightweight, high 
strength alloys, and investigating 
gravitational and geodetic problems. 

For Air Force Exploratory Devel- 
opment Laboratory Support, $97 mil- 
lion is requested for FY 1967. . . . 

Advanced Research Projects Agency 
(ARPA). 

ARPA operates as a small research 
and development management team, 
supervising its Service-conducted pro- 
grams by overall financial control and 
technical direction. A total of $211 
million is included in the FY 1967 
program for ARPA's projects in Ex- 
ploratory Development, compared with 
$223 million in FY 1966 and $234 
million in FY 1965 

Advanced Development 

This category includes projects 
which have advanced to a point where 
the development of experimental 
hardware for technical or operational 
testing ia required prior to the deter- 
mination of whether the items should 
be designed or engineered for eventual 
Service use. In contrast to engineer- 
ing development where design speci- 
fications are employed, advanced 
development permits the use of per- 
formance specifications which provide 
the contractor greater latitude in 
meeting the requirement, thereby en- 
couraging innovation. Both the Over- 
the-Horizon radar and the anti-satel- 
lite systems were developed in this 
category but turned out to be easily 
convertible to operational systems, To 
encourage innovation, we plan to con- 
tinue the advanced development effort 
at a high levelabout ?35 million 
in FY 1967 compared with $830 mil- 
lion in FY 1966 and $588 million in 
FY 1965, 

Army, 

.The first two items on the Army's 
list of advanced developments Op- 

24 



crational Evaluation V/STOL and 
New Surveillance Aircraft are both 
part of a broader Defense Depart- 
ment program for the development of 
experimental prototype vertical, or 
short, take-off and landing aircraft 
suitable for operational testing by the 
three Services. 

A combined total of about $380 mil- 
lion has been programmed by the 
three Military departments for this 
effort, from its inception through FY 
1966. , . . 

... We have included a total of 
about $72 million in FY 1967 for 
V/STOL developments compared with 
$69,5 million in FY 1966. 

The $1 million included under Ad- 
vanced Development, Army for Op- 
eration Evaluation V/STOL in FY 
1967 is to cover the Army's cost of 
testing the XC-142A. The $3 million 
for New Surveillance Aircraft is for 
test and evaluation of the P-1127, 
XV-5A and OV-10A 

For Aircraft Suppressive Fire Sys- 
tems, $4 million is included in the FY 
1967 budget. . . . 

The Automatic Data Systems for 
the Army in the Field program is 
an effort to develop an integrated 
command and control information sys- 
tem for field army use by applying 
automatic data processing techniques 
to the interrelated functions of fire 
control, intelligence, operations, logis- 
tics and personnel. Four million dol- 
lars is requested in the FY 1967 
Budget to continue work on various 
aspects of this effort. 

The Surface-to-Air Missile Devel- 
opment (SAM-D), for which funds 
are included in the FY 1967 Budget, 
is the advanced missile system de- 
signed for use against sophisticated 
aircraft and short range ballistic mis- 
siles. ... The FY 1967 effort is 
directed toward the start of Engi- 
neering Development, assuming that 
the current contract definition is suc- 
cessfully completed. In addition, in- 



vestigations arc under way to deter- 
mine the extent to which coniwt 
subsystems and components could ba 
developed for both the SAM-D ac.d 
the Navy's Advanced Surface-to-Air 
Missile (ASMS). 

About $13 million is included in 
the FY 19(17 budget for the Army 
portion of the Defense satellite com- 
munications program. . , . 

The Army's Limited War Lab; 
formerly included in Exploratory De- 
velopment, will now be carried vinttei 
Advanced Development. ... A total 
of $7 million is requested for Ihi 
Limited War Laboratory in FY lflG7, 

Some $11 million is Enclmkd in the 
FY 1967 budget for accelerated auti- f 
malarial research to counter the drug 
resistant malaria now being encoun.' 
tercd by our forces in Vietnam, 

Navy. 

The first two items in the Navy 
list of advanced developments rep- 
resent the Navy's participation in tlie 
Department of Defense V/STOL de- 
velopment program, The amount re- 
quested in the FY 1967 budget for 
V/STOL development is, to continue 
work on the X-22, which ia now 
completely funded by the Nnvy. . . 

I have already touched upon the 
next item, the Advanced Surface-to 4 
Air Missile System (ASMS) for 
which $2 million is requested in FY 
1967 

The $2 million requested for the 
Landing Force Support Weapon (LF- 
SW) is to provide for the flight test- 
ing of the Army's Lance missile in 
a sea environment, i.e., Inuncbinff (he- 
missile from a ship in support of tend- 
ing forces. 

The funds requested for A TIM I arc 
to carry forward the development of 
a new anti -radiation missile system 
as a follow-on for the Shrike mis- 
sile 

Advanced ARM technology is a* 
new effort to be initiated in FY 1967,' 
which looks beyond the ARM I, Four 




V/STOL Aircraft XC-142A. NIKE-X Multi-Function Array Rndar. 

March 1966 



million dollars is requested to initiate 
this program in FY 1967. 

The $3 million included for Aug- 
mented Thrust Propulsion is to con- 
tinue work on an advanced sea-based 
deterrent, i.e., a broad program of in- 
vestigation and applied research fo- 
cused on possible configurations of 
future sea-based strategic systems 
from which an advanced weapon sys- 
tem may eventually evolve. 

The $3 million requested for Astro- 
nautics in FY 1967 is for the Navy's 
portion of the Defense satellite com- 
munications program, more specific- 
ally, for the development of new 
ship-based terminals. No additional 
funds are required Cor the geophysical 
satellite (Project ANNA). 

The remaining items on the Navy's 
Advanced Development list are all 
related to .anti-submarine warfare. We 
have included in the FY 19fi7 budget 
a total of $355.4 million for ASW 
RDT&E, $98.5 million of which is for 
Advanced Development, 

The first item in this group, Ad- 
vanced Undersea Surveillance, in- 
cludes two projects for which a total 
of $fi million is requested in FY 1967. 
The first of these, ASW Surveillance, 
for which $4 million is requested, is 
the combination of the Artemis and 
Trident efforts. . . . The remaining 
$2 million is required for a now proj- 
ect, Inshore Undersea Warfare, which 
is designed to explore detection tech- 
niques to counter very small under- 
water crrtft and frogmen attacking 
ships, harbor installations and am- 
phibious assault areas, 

The next item, Airborne ASW De- 
tection Systems, for which ,$23 million 
is requested in FY 1907, includes a 
number of related projects. . , . 

Funds are included in the FY 1967 
budget for the development of a num- 
ber of now sonars for submarines and 
surface ships, including passive and 
active sonars with significantly in- 
creased performance, reliability and 
maintainability. Funds arc also in- 
cluded for advanced development work 
to improve the combat effectiveness 
of current and new torpedoes. 

The $4 million requested for Ad- 
vanced Surface Craft in FY 1967 is 
for tho evaluation of the 110-ton, 45- 
knot hydrofoil patrol craft (PCH) 
already completed and the 320-ton, 
50-knot hydrofoil auxiliary ship (AG- 
EH) to be completed this spring. . . . 

One of the important efforts being 1 
pursued in FY 1967 is the Deep Sub- 
mergence program for which $22 mil- 
lion is requested, . . . 

The program Reactor Propulsion 
Plants, for which $13 million is re- 
quested in FY 1967, covers two major 
projects, One of these is directed to 
the development of a "natural circula- 
tion" nuclear power plant which would 



pi-ovide a quieter, safer, more reli- 
able propulsion plant for submarines. 
The second project is directed to the 
development of a high shaft horse- 
power nuclear propulsion plant suit- 
able for use on attack carriers. . . . 
. . . The Sea Hawk/ASW Escort 
project is being reduced from a full 
systems development to work on the 
principal components. The first of 
these projects, Combined Gas Turbine 
Propulsion, is concerned with the 
overall performance and potentials of 
ship-based gas turbine machinery. 
The second is the Active Planar Array 
Sonar, a sonar which would be built 
into the hull of the ship, thus pro- 
viding a much larger radiating and 
receiving aperture. , , . 

. . . The other two elements of this 
effort are the ASW Ship Command 
and Control and tho ASW Ship In- 
tegrated Combat System. . . . 

Air Force. 

The first five items on the Air 
Force list of advanced developments 
are all part of the V/STOL aircraft 
technology program discussed earlier. 

The V/STOL Assault Transport 
(CX-6) project involves preliminary 
studies for the development of a full- 
scale prototype aircraft capable of 
carrying large payloads over rela- 
tively long distances. 

The Tri-Sorvicc V/STOL develop- 
ment is concerned with the continued 
operational evaluation of the XC- 
142A. 

The V/STOL Aircraft Technology 
program for which $3 million is re- 
quested in FY 1907, will provide for 
evaluation of various domestic and 
foreign V/STOL concepts, designs 
and equipment with a view towards 
the eventual design of a common op- 
erational V/STOL fighter aircraft 

The V/STOL Engine Development 
project provides for the development 
of two different types o:C engines the 
first, a pure lift engine and the sec- 
ond, a lift cruise engine which can 
deflect its thrust to produce lift dur- 
ing takeoff and landing and also be 
used for forward propulsion. . . . 

The fifth project is the Lightweight 
Turbojet and is intended essentially 
to demonstrate the technology for 
lightweight turbojet engines for vari- 
ous purposes including V/STOL. . . . 

The next two projects which were 
discussed briefly in connection with 
our future manned bomber de- 
fense program Overland Radar and 
A WAGS are closely related. The 
first is concerned with the develop- 
ment of the radar technology which 
would be needed in airborne warning 
and control systems such as the Air 
Force's Airborne Warning and Con- 
trol System (AWACS) and the 



Navy 's Advanced Ai rborne Earl y 
Warning Aircraft. . . . 

The next item is Advanced Fila- 
ment Composites for which $10 mil- 
lion is requested to provide for the 
fabrication of test quantities of high 
strength, lightweight components 
made of glass fibers 

The $6 million requested for Recon- 
naissance Strike Capability is to 
develop and demonstrate a capability 
with multiple high-resolution sensors 
such as side looking radars for both 
Strategic and General Purpose 
Forces. . . . 

The FY 1967 budget includes $6 
million to continue the X-16 project. 

The $8 million requested for Ad- 
vanced ASM Technology, formerly 
known as Tactical Missile Guidance 
Development, would provide for the 
development of both all-weather and 
fair-weather command and automatic 
guidance techniques for missiles em- 
ployed against ground targets. . . . 

Ten million dollars is requested in 
FY 1967 for continued study of the 
various technological and operational 
concepts for an Advanced ICBM, , . . 

The AMSA program, for which $11 
million is requested in FY 1967, was 
discussed in connection with the stra- 
tegic bomber forces. . . . 

The remaining major items on the 
Air Force list of advanced develop- 
ments are all space projects which I 
discussed earlier. 

Engineering Development 

This category includes those proj- 
ects being engineered for Service use, 
but which have not as yet been ap- 
proved for production and deploy- 
ment. 

Army. 

. . . The $447 million requested for 
Nike X will continue, on an urgent 
basis, a reoriented ABM effort em- 
phasizing the development of an 
austere version of the multi-function 
phase array radar (TACMAR), the 
missile sito radar (MSR), high speed 
data processing equipment, the high 
acceleration Sprint missile and the 
now exoatmospheric (DM153C2) mis- 
sile. . . . 

The principle element of the next 
item, Forward Area Air Defense, 
was the Mauler program which has 
now been terminated, , . , 

Forty-six million dollars ia re- 
quested in the FY 1967 budget to 
continue engineering development of 
a variety of weapons other than 
missiles. Included in this category is 
the Special Purpose Individual 
Weapon (SPIW) which may be con- 
sidered as a possible replacement for 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



25 



the M-14 rifle and M-79 grenade 
launcher. Competitive models are un- 
der development and the better of the 
two will be selected in FY 1967. In 
a related effort, an evaluation of all 
competing small arms weapons, in- 
cluding SPIW, is being conducted to 
determine the best successor to the 
present small arms family. Recom- 
mendations from this evaluation, ex- 
pected in July 1966, may affect the 
decision to complete the SPIW proj- 
ect. Development of the 107mm 
Heavy Mortar as a replacement for 
the current 4.2-inch mortar is con- 
tinuing. . . . 

Another major effort is the Medium 
Anti-tank Weapon (MAW) system. 
Two competitive systems have been 
considered and a final selection has 
been made. Active development will 
commence this year. 

A new major development in artil- 
lery weapons is the 156mm light- 
weight Close Support Weapons Sys- 
tem. . . , 

The next two items, Aircraft Sup- 
pressive Fire System and Advanced 
Aerial Fire Support System, are 
closely related, The former, for which 
$16 million is requested, is concerned 
with the development and -Adaptation 
of weapon sub-systems for Army air- 
craft; and it was under this program 
that the presently operational heli- 
copter armament systems were de- 
veloped. During FY I960 we initiated 
development of a second generation 
hard point target weapon system, 
TOW, to replace the French developed 
and produced SS-11 anti-tank missile 
which had been adapted to helicopter 
use. Preliminary design release and 
the delivery of two TOW systems, 
adapted to a helicopter, are expected 
during the latter part of FY 1967 and 
will undergo development tests. The 
Advanced Aerial Fire Support Sys- 
tem project involves engineering de- 
velopment of a completely integrated 
armed "helicopter-like" system as a 
replacement for the present impro- 
vised armed UH-1B system. , . . 

The $2 million provided in FY 1966 
for Tactical Transport Aircraft will 
complete the development and evalu- 
ation of the CV-7 (Buffalo). ... We 
have decided not to produce and de- 
ploy this aircraft since other aircraft 
are available to meet Army needs. 

The $14 million requested for Com- 
bat Surveillance and Target Acquisi- 
tion includes a number of different 
projects. Development is proceeding 
with a hand-held radar for the detec- 
tion of moving vehicles and person- 
nel in forward combat areas; and a 
standardized tactical image process- 
ing and interpretation system. A con- 
tract for test models of a new type 
of sound ranging equipment to help 

26 



locate hostile weapons will be awarded 
in FY 1967. Tests of a new unmanned 
aerial surveillance system, designed 
to provide target coverage when the 
weather or enemy action restricts 
manned aircraft flights, were con- 
ducted last year and we will 'now begin 
studies of more advanced concepts in 
this area, 

Thirty million dollars is requested 
for Communications and Electronics. 
Included in this element is the de- 
velopment of strategic and tactical 
communications equipment to provide 
an integrated theater army communi- 
cations network interconnecting with 
the world-wide Defense Communica- 
tion System. Funds are included for 
the night vision effort which offers, 
in addition to an early increase in 
operational capability, a definite pos- 
sibility of a second generation of such 
equipment. Provision is also made for 
the support of an interim air traffic 
control system, the development of 
automatic data processing equipment, 
etc. 

The funds included in the FY 1967 
Budget for the Heavy Anti-Tank As- 
sault Weapon (TOW) will provide 
for an expanded test program needed 
to ensure a high level of reliability 
for this front line weapon system. 

Navy. 

The first item on the Navy's list, 
Poseidon, was previously discussed in 
connection with the Strategic Offen- 
sive and Defensive Forces, The ap- 
proximately $300 million requested in 
the FY 1967 budget will provide for 
the accelerated program designed to 
meet the planned operational avail- 
ability date. Total development cost is 
estimated at $1.2 billion. 

The funds requested for Point De- 
fense Surface Missile System (PD- 
SMS) will support a two-pronged 
effort a near term, flexible air de- 
fense system for the many smaller 
ships which presently have no on- 
board capability of their own, and a 
follow-on effort to provide a signifi- 
cantly better system for the fu- 
ture. . . . 



The next four items on the Navy 1 * 
list of engineering developments ar^ 
all associated with undersea wavfait 
and, in total, amount to 70 million 
in FY 1967. The largest single efforl 
in this category is the development tti 
the MK-48 torpedo. . . . 

The next item provides for the de- 
velopment of a sonobuoy capable cl 
giving the bearing of a target clircctlj 
to the attacking aircraft. . .. . TFit 
funds requested for FY 19(17 wilt 
sontially complete this effort whit I 
was begun last June with $2 millioi 
of FY 1965 emergency funds, 

The funds included in the ft 
1967 request for ASW Kookcts art 
for the development of n rocfct-J 
boosted ballistic flight missilo vhicl 
will be compatible with the ASROC 
launcher and fire control syatoin anc 
will have an increased effective mug* 
Contract definition and the fttart ol 
engineering development tin; plnnnec 
for FY 1967. 

Other ASW engineering develop- 
ments include a passive .sonar Rj/sterr 
for submarines which will improve 
reception of acoustic signals and de- 
tection and classification of omitting 
objects. Also included in thia catcRoii 
are a number of mine warfare devel- 
opments, including new mine- firing de- 
vices, mine hunting sormrfi and th& 
use of helicopters to sweep e:i mines. 

The $8 million requested for Un- ; 
guided/Conventional Air Liiunchcd 
Weapons will support such ordnance 
development efforts as Fircyo, an im- 
proved fire bomb and SmiUoyo II, fl 
second generation retarded liomlt. 

The $12 million requested in FY 
1967 for Marine Corps Developments 
includes: an amphibious assault per- 
sonnel carrier capable of transporting" 
infantry weapons and supplies 
through very rough surf; a Inndlng 
force amphibious support vehicle for 
rapid movement of supplies and 
equipment from ship to nlioro ar.d< 
over land; a, light-weight hclicop- : 
ter-transportable, high performance 
ground radar; an automated system' 
for integrating air support activities' 
into the Marine Corps tactical dntaj 
system; and a new data transmission^ 




Anti-Tank Assault Weapon TOW. 



USAP SR-71 Aircraft. j 

March 196$ 



system for use with Standard com- 
"munications equipment. 

The COIN/LARA (OV-10) air- 
craft, discussed in this section last 
year under the heading Special War- 
faro Navy Aircraft, is now an opera- 
tional systems development and will 
be placed in production. We are pres- 
ently studying the possibility of a 
larger transport version of this air- 
craft. 

Air Force. 

I have already discussed most of 
the Air Force engineering develop- 
ments in connection with other pro- 
grams. 

The funds requested for the J-58 
engine will continue. the development 
of this advanced power plant used in 
the SR-71 and the YF-12. . . . 

. . . The $18 million for the XB- 
70 in FY 1967 is for the Defense 
Department's share of a follow-on test 
program to he -pointly funded with 
NASA. This program, which would 
extend through FY 1968 at a total 
cost of about $54 million, would pro- 
vide experimental data on structures, 
engines, aero/thermodynamics, etc., 
for large aircraft in supersonic flight. 

The $4 million requested for Close 
Support Fighter will carry foi-ward 
preliminary studies of an advanced 
fighter attack aircraft for both the 
Navy and the Air Force. 

Funds are also included in the FY 
1967 budget for the continued de- 
velopment of the YF-12A and the 
ASG-18/AIM-47A fire control and 
air-to-air missile systems already in- 
stalled in that aircraft and for the 
adaptation of those systems to the 
F-12 airframe, 

The FY 19(>7 budget provides for 
a wide variety of techniques designed 
to improve the capabilities of our 
strategic missiles to penetrate anti- 
missile defenses as well aa to improve 
their accuracy and overall weapon 
system effectiveness. , , , 



As previously mentioned, the Mark 
II Avionics project has been moved 
this year from Advanced to Engi- 
neering development. . . . 

. . . Now undergoing contract defi- 
nition, we expect to select a develop- 
ment contractor this year. The Mark 
II will have many of the same com- 
ponents of the Navy's Integrated 
Light Attack Avionics System 
(ILAAS). 

For Nike-Zeus Targets to support 
the Nike X development program, $8 
million is requested for FY 1967. . . . 

The $11 million requested for the 
Joint Advanced Tactical Command 
and Air Control System will provide 
for a new program to develop a fam- 
ily of standard equipment such as 
displays, computers and communica- 
tions items for use in the tactical 
command and control systems of all 
the Services. . . . The funds requested 
will initiate the development phase 
and permit the determination of the 
joint funding program for future 
years. 

Management and Support 

Army. 

About $90 million is requested for 
the support of the White Sands Mis- 
sile Range. ... A major effort at this 
facility is the range instrumentation 
improvement program, now in its sec- 
ond year, which will refine the data 
collection capability and augment the 
range comminii cation system. 

We arc also requesting $33 million 
for the Kwajalein Test Site, now op- 
erated by the Army. We are now de- 
veloping a capability at this site to 
recover re-entry vehicles that impact 
in the lagoon. 

The $195 million requested for Gen- 
eral Support covers the costs of all 
Army R&D installations and activities 
other than White Sands and Kwaja- 
lein. . . . 



Navy. 

The Pacific Missile Range with 
headquarters at Point Mugu, Califor- 
nia, is responsible for range schedul- 
ing, communications, weather and 
meteorological services and data re- 
duction in support of assigned missile 
and space launch operations in the 
Pacific. . . . The FY 1967 request of 
$72.7 million is $1.4 million more 
than currently programmed for FY 
19C6. . . . 

The Atlantic Undersea Test Evalu- 
ation Center (AUTEC) will have 
three underwater test ranges sited in 
a deep sea canyon off the Bahamas, 
designed to test weapons, sonars and 
acoustics systems. The $12 million re- 
quest for FY 1967 is $4 million more 
than the current FY 1966 program, 
primarily because of hig-her construc- 
tion requirements next year. , . . 

Air Force. 

For the Eastern Test Range, $20(5 
million is requested in FY 1907, some- 
what lower than for the current fis- 
cal year. . . . 

. . . About $70 million is re- 
quested for FY 1967 to support the 
Air Force Western Test Range 
(AFWTR) which consists of a com- 
plex of instrumentation networks sup- 
porting Air Force, Navy and NASA 
launches from Vandenberg Air Force, 
Base, Point Argucllo and Point Mugni. 

General Support, including- Develop- 
ment Support, will require $612 mil- 
lion in FY 1967. . . . 

Financial Summary 

The Research and Development 
Program, including the development 
of systems approved for deployment, 
will require $6.9 billion in New Obli- 
gational Authority for FY 1967, A 
comparison with prior years is sliown 
below. 



($ Billions, Fiscal Years) 




1962 

Actual 


1963 

Actual 


1964 

Actual 


1965 
Actual 


1966 
Est. 


1967 
Proposed 


R&D except systems approved for 
deployment 


4.2 


5.1 


5.4 


4.9 


5.3 


6,6 


R&D systems approved for deploy- 
ment 


2.6 


2jB 


2.2 


2.0 


2.1 


1.9 


Total R&D 


6.8 


7.6 


7.6 


6.9 


7.4 


7.4 


Less: Support from other appropria- 
tions 


-0.5 


-0.6 


-0.5 


-0.4 


-0.5 


-0.5 


Total RDT&E (TOA) 


6.3 


7.1 


7.1 


6.5 


6.9 


6.9 


Less: Financing Adjustments 


-0.9 


-0.1 


-0.1 


__ 


-0.1 





Total RDT&E (NOA) 


5.4 


7.0 


7.0 


e.5 


6.8 


6.9 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Brig. Gen. Woodrow W. Vaughan, 
USA, will become Asst. Dlr. for Plans, 
Programs and Systems, Defense 
Supply Agency, early in April. He 
will replace Maj. Gen. Victor J. Mac- 
Laughlln, USA, who is to be Com- 
mandiiiK General; Fort Lee, Va. 

Capt. J. C. Hetler, SC, USN, has 
assumed duty as Dep. Asst. Dir, for 
Plans, ProKrams and Systems, De- 
fense Supply Agency. He replaced 
Erie. Gen. Joseph S. Reynaud, USMC, 
who has retired. 

Maj. Gen. John C. Meyer, USAF, 
formerly Commander, 12th Air Fowp, 
has been assigned as Dep. Dir., The 
Joint Staff, Office of the Joint Chiefs 
of Staff. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 




Lt. General William W. Dick, Jr., 
Chief of Research and Development, 
will become Commanding General, Al- 
lied Land Forces, Southeastern Eu- 
rope, on. April 1. He will succeed Gen. 
John H. Michaclis. Gen. Michaehs has 
been named Commanding General, 
Fifth U.S. Army, succeeding Lt. Gen. 
Charles G. Dodge, who is retiring. 

Maj. Gen. Austin W. Belts, who has 
been Dep. Chief of Research and De- 
velopment, has been nominated for 
promotion to lieutenant general and 
assigned as Chief of Research and 
Development replacing Gen. Dick. 

Lt. Gen. Theodore J. Conway, who 
has been Asst. Chief of Staff for 
Force Development, has succeeded Lt. 
Gen. William W. Qulim as Command- 
ing General, U.S. Seventh Army. 
General Quimi has retired. 

Lt. G. James H. Polk, Command- 
ing General of the V Corps, Europe, 
1ms been designated Asst. Chief of 
Staff for Force Development. His 
successor as Commanding General, 
V Corps, Europe, is Lt. Gen. George 
It, Mather, who has been U.S. if e- 
pi-e tentative to the Permanent Mill-. 
tary "Deputies Group of the Central 
Treaty Organization. 

Dr. Lnwrnnce W. Wallace, Special 
Asst. for the Top Management Semi- 
nar at the Army Management Engi- 
neering Training Agency (AMETA), 
Rock Island Arsenal, has retired. Dr. 
"Wallace, who retired with IB years 
of Federal service at the age of 85, 
will continue as a consultant and 
adviser to AMETA. 

Col Vern E. Johnson, former Chief 
of the Security and Investigation 
Div Office of the Provost Marshal 
General, has assumed new duties as 
the Provost Marshal and Security 
Officer of the U.S. Army Strategic 
Communications Command. 

Col. Edwin I. Donley has been nom- 
inated for promotion to the rank of 
brigadier general and assigned as 
Dew Commander for Land Combat 
Systems of the Army Missile Com- 
mand, Redstone Arsena , AU^ He re- 
places Brig. Gen. Charles W. Eiflcr, 
now serving in Vietnam, 

28 



Col. Bernard R. Luczak, former 

Project Manager of the SAM-D Air 
Defense System, has been nominated 
for promotion to the rank of brig- 
adier general and assigned to the 
Army Ammunition Procurement and 
Supply Agency, Jollet, HI. His re- 
placement as SAM-D Project Man- 
ager is Col. Edward M. Dooley. 

Brig. Gen. Carroll H. Dunn, who 
was selected for promotion to major 
general last fall, has been designated 
Dir. of Constructjon, Military Assis- 
tance Command Vietnam. 

Col. N. A. Lord will become the 
Canaveral District Engineer, Merntt 
Island, Fla., effective in early May. 
Lt. Col. James A. Hill, former Dep. 
Commander of Rock Island Arsenal, 
has been appointed Dir. of Research 
and Development, U.S. Army Weap- 
ons Command. He succeeds Col. 
George D. Carnahan, who has re- 
tired. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 




Veteran naval aviator RAdm, 
Henry L. Miller, B3 will become 
the Navy's Chief of Information 
on April 12. 

Adm. Miller comes to Wash- 
ington after serving 18 months 
as Commander Carrier Division 
3, the Seventh Fleet's task group 
operating off the coast of Viet- 
nam, 

Led by the world's largest air- 
craft carrier, atomic powered 
USS Enterprise (CVAN-66). 
Carrier Division 3, also called 
Task Group 77.7, is the Navy's 
main striking force supporting 
operations in Vietnam. 

The new Chief of Information 
is a native of Fairbanks, Alaska. 
During World War H he served 
as a naval flyer in the Pacific. 
He has been awarded the Legion 
of Merit twice and the Distin- 
guished Flying Cross five times. 



Dr. Gerald W. Johnson has 
appointed Dir. of Naval Laboratories,.^ 
a newly created post, Dr. Johnsi-u 
was formerly associated with tfu 
Lawrence Radiation Laboratory 
Livermore, Calif., where ho was As- 
sociate Dir. for peaceful applicatioi 
of nuclear power. In his new positici 
Dr. Johnson will be the principal ad 
visor to the Asst. Secretary of th 
Navy (Research and Dcvclopnwnr 
and have managerial rcsiionsibilitie: 
for Navy research and clcveloproi-rv 
laboratories. 

RAdm. William P. Mack, Chief o 
Information, has been ronssiKncd a.' 
Commander, Amphibious Group Two 
His successor as Chief of InforJiiatsc-r 
will be RAdm. Henry L, Miller, Corc| 
mander, Carrier Div. Three. 

Brig. Gen. Earl K. Anderson 
USMC, has been assigned us Dep 
Chief of Staff (Research , Dcvclcp 
ment and Studies), Ha., U.S. Marir.r 
Corps. He replaced Brig. (ien. Wow 
B. Kyle, USMC. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Maj. Gen. Frederick K. Terrell 
Commander, 30th NORAI) Heri* 
and 30th Air Div. (SACK), Tnn\ 
AFB, Wis., will become Dep. Ch-^ 
of Staff, Plans and Policy for Nottf 
American Air Defense Com inn rid st-: 
Continental Air Dofentw) Comimu 
effective April 1. 

Brig. Gen. Ralph C. Hock woo* 
Commander, San Bernardino Air Ma- 
teriel Area, Norton AFH, Calif.* h=* 
retired. 



Nurses Sought 
for Military 

The Department of Defense fci 

authorized the Military Dflpattmfrf 
to increase their recruiting cfTorla io 
both male and female nurses Irtcau) 
of current strength buildup nwd rt 
need for increased medical servlcdi I 
Southeast Asia. 

Warrant officer appointments u 
available to qualified civilian nuri 
male or female, havinR two years t 
training and E-5 or servant fcri 
appointments to qualified civilian I 
censed practical nurses with one ya 
of training. \ 

Interested nurses mny contact d 
nearest Armed Forces Recruitri 
Office or write to the Bur^n G$i 
eral of the Army, Navy or Air Fort 

March iti 



Address by General Creighton W. 
A brains , Jr. , USA , Vice Chief of 
Staff, U. S. Army, at the West Point 
Society Luncheon, New York, N. Y., 
Jan. 25, 1966. 




Gen. Creighton W. Abrams, Jr., USA. 

The Strategy of 
Communist China 

The most recent pronouncements 
from Peking recall to mind the fact 
that many people did not appreciate 
the true nature of the Japanese 
tin-cat in the 1920'a and 1930's or the 
significance of Hitler's pronounce- 
ments in the 1980's and especially his 
grand design as outlined in Mein 
Kampf. I believe and hope we have 
learned that particular history les- 
son, hut there is still some danger 
that the sinister, 'ruthless and long- 
term nature of the Chinese commu- 
nist threat may not be appreciated. 

About 167 years ago, the Philadel- 
phia Monthly Magazine wrote about 
a civil war reportedly going on in 
China. What was written then may 
be true in part today, "Our knowledge 
of that nation is little, and that little 
too obscure to be trusted," 

In his treatise, "On Protracted 
War," written in 1938, Mao Tse-tung 

wrote : 

"It is extremely important to keep 
the enemy in the dark about whore 
and when our forces will attack. 
This creates a basis for misconcep- 
tions and unpreparedness on his 
part." 

You will recall that it was in early 
1961 that Mr. Khrushchev, then 
Premier of the USSR, held a congress 
in Moscow with representatives of 81 
"world communist parties. In a major 



policy statement to that congress, 
Mr. Khrushchev acknowledged that 
the Soviet communists recognized the 
dangers inherent in not only nuclear 
war, but in local wars as well. Al- 
though the Soviet leader preached 
caution with respect to general and 
local war, he strongly advocated so- 
called "wars of liberation" as the 
most effective current means to pro- 
mote the communist cause. 

Although this pronouncement came 
at ( a time when the Soviet and the 
Chinese communist leaders were grow- 
ing farther and farther apart in then- 
views on how world communism 
should bo propagated, the idea of 
"wars of liberation" or "people's 
wars" was right down the line for the 
Chinese communists, because Mao Tse- 
tung in great part owed his political 
position and power as leader of Red 
China to the pursuit of such a route. 
Whereas the Russian Revolution of 
1917 drew upon the urban workers 
and the defeated military forces of 
Russia for its manpower, the Chinese 
communists did it the other way. Ad- 
mittedly, the following comparison is 
oversimplified, but where the Bolshe- 
vik workers' army spilled a consider- 
able amount of revolutionary blood 
overcoming vast areas of Russia and 
its rural peasantry, the Chinese com- 
munists founded their movement in 
the rural population. Then they iso- 
lated, overcame and occupied the 
major cities of mainland China. 

Whether this pattern of internal 
conquest was by accident or design 
wo may never really know. But in any 
event, it had its effect upon the Red 
Chinese strategists who have adopted 
it as the basis for a militant and 
aggressive foreign policy. Through a 
recent article written by Marshal Lin 
Piao, Mao has broadcast his basic 
strategic doctrine to the world. I 
should like to quote from Marshal 
Lin's article. 

"Taking the entire globe, if 
North America and Western 
Europe can bo called 'the cities of 
the world, 1 then Asia, Africa and 
Latin America constitute 'the rural 
areas of the world.' . . , In a sense 
the contemporary world revolution 
also presents a picture of the en- 
circlement of 'cities' by the 'rural 
areas.' In the final analysts the 
whole cause of the world revolu- 
tion hinges on the revolutionary 
struggle of the Asian, African and 
Latin American people who make 
the overwhelming majority of the 
world's population," 

This goal of global conquest may 
seem impossible for the Red Chinese 
to attain, but so were the goals Hit- 
ler set out in Mein Kampf. However, 
if Mao and his supporters believe they 
can attain them as Hitler did then 



the actions Mao may take can create 
serious threats to world peace, as ho 
has already done in Korea, Tibet and 
India. 

To lend support to the fact that 
Mao believed Red China will eventu- 
ally triumph, one needs only to .recall 
his background. For about 22 of Mao 
Tse-tung-'s 72 years, he led long and 
at times seemingly hopeless armed 
struggle against superior forces. In 
1927, after briefly working with tho 
communists, Chiang Kai-shek de- 
stroyed their cadre in the major cities, 
Mao salvaged the pieces and from 
1927 to 1933, he waged guerrilla war- 
fare against the Nationalist ChincBc 
from rural bases in the mountains of 
South China. By 1933, Chiang Kai- 
shek's army totaled about one million 
men, but Mao's army, relatively small 
and poorly trained, held out against 
five attempts by the Nationalists to 
encircle it. However, by 1934, Mao'H 
position was so precarious that he left 
his bases in South China and began 
the legendary Long March to the 
North. From October 1934 to October 
1935, Mao's army marched about 
7,600 miles over rugged terrain, while 
also defending itself against the Na- 
tionalists. 

Two years after completing the 
march, Mao led his army against tho 
invading Japanese, By mobilizing the 
peasants and by skillfully working on 
nationalist sentiment, Mao uaod 
guerrilla warfare to harass the in- 
vading Japanese, Although nominally 
allied with Chiang Kai-shek against 
the Japanese, Mao continued his poli- 
tical struggle against the National- 
ists and, in addition, fought throo 
major military engagements against 
the Nationalists in 1D39, 1941 and 
1943. 

History shows that the communiBttt 
are patient' and that they view their 
ultimate goals from the long term 
viewpoint. That Red China's first ob- 
jective is to dominate Asia, there can 
be little doubt. This is supported by 
an item in the Congressional Record 
of April 29, 1954, which is purported 
to be a summary of a memorandum 
written by Mao Tse-tung and carried 
to Moscow by Foreign Minister Cliou 
En-lai in March 1963. 

"It appears that time has come 
that we have to look upon Asia as 
our immediate goal. Under the pres- 
ent circumstances, any vigorous 
action in Europe suoh as internal 
revolution, effective infiltration, or 
intimidation into inaction or sub- 
mission is now impossible. ... In 
Asia, on the contrary, such tactics 
will yield an abundant harvest." 

In light of what happened a year 
later, the next quote from the memo- 
randum is most interesting. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



29 



"The military operations in Indo- 
china should be carried out ... to 
make the war extremely unpopular 
among the French people and to 
make the French and Americans 
extremely hateful among the Indo- 
chinese people, The object is ito force 
the French to back out of Indochina 
preferably through the face-saving 
means of an armistice. Once for- 
eign intervention is out of the pic- 
ture, . . . infiltration, forming united 
fronts with the progressive elements 
in and outside the reactionary re- 
gimes will accelerate the process of 
liberation." 

The global nature of lied China's 
ambitions is evident today in its vocal 
encouragement of dissidence and civil 
strife, particularly in the under- 
developed world, and in its promotion 
of the formation of factions embrac- 
ing Chinese communist revolutionary 
theory, or nationalist communist 
movements wherever possible. Some of 
these attempts have Jailed miserably; 
others have succeeded to the point of 
winning entire nationalist communist 
parties to Peking's viewpoint in its 
dispute with Moscow. 

Why this effort so far from main- 
land China? 

Marshal Lin again gives us the an- 
swer, and I quote : 

"The more successful the develop- 
ment of a people's war in a given 
region, the larger the number of 
U. S. . . . forces that can be pinned 
down and depleted there. When the 
United States . . . are hard pressed 
in one place, they have no alterna- 
tive but to loosen their grip on 
others. , . , The peoples of Asia, 
Africa, Latin America and other 
regions can destroy it piece by 
piece, some striking at its head, and 
others at its feet, That is why 
the greatest fear of the United 
States ... is that people's wars will 
be launched in different parts of the 
world. . . ." 

General Giap of North Vietnam has 
said of the conflict in South Vietnam: 
"South Vietnam is the model of 
the national liberation movement of 
our time ... If the special warfare 
that the U. S. imperialists are test- 
ing in South Vietnam is overcome, 
then it can be defeated everywhere 
in the world." 

This then is the character of the 
Red Chinese threat. It is global in 
concept, total in its dimensions, deter- 
mined, implacable and insidious in its 
actions, 

Communist China is using Hanoi's 
manpower to make South Vietnam 
their major test case to prove that 
aggression by proxy cannot be 
stopped. 

The Chinese communist support was 
a major factor in the Viet Minh fight 
against the French, so their continued 
support of Hanoi today is not un- 
usual. Marshal Lin reaffirmed this 
support when .lie wrote : 

"The determination of the Chinese 
people to support and aid the Viet- 
namese people In their struggle 



against the United States ... is 

unshakable." 

After the Chinese communists had 
won control of the Chinese mainland 
in 1949, they began giving substantial 
assistance to the Viet Minh. They 
established training centers in south- 
ern China where Vlot Minh guerrilla 
forces were organized, trained and 
amply supplied with weapons, includ- 
ing machine guns, mortars and pack 
howitzers. By August of 1950, the 
Chinese had equipped and trained 
three regular Viet Minh divisions, 
which by the end of the year had at- 
tacked and destroyed the chain of 
French posts guarding tiie north 
Indo-China border. 

The Viet Minh cause was indirectly 
aided by the entrance of Communist 
China into the Korean War, because 
Chinese war industries were ex- 
panded, and the construction of roads 
and railroads was speeded up. Al- 
though the bulk of the new military 
supplies went to aid the Chinese 
armies in Korea, more supplies were 
also made available to the Viet Minh 
guerrillas. 

Following Dien Bicn Phu and the 
Geneva Accords in 19B4, the commu- 
nists consolidated their gains in North 
Vietnam, developed forward storage 
depots, staging areas, and constructed 
roads and bridges to improve their 
lines of communication. The success- 
ful Viet Minh offensives, in eastern 
Laos in J.%3 and 195-1, resulted in the 
northern third of South Vietnam 
being strategically outflanked, since 
it gave the communists access to what 
we now call the Ho Chi Minh trail. 
The Geneva Accords also provided a 
convenient tactical pause to enable the 
Viet Minh to organise the Viet Cong 
insurgency, 

In assessing the operations in Viet- 
nam today, it is important to remem- 
ber that from 1950 to 1954, Viet Minh 
combat operations were conducted 
against the French and Vietnamese in 
South Vietnam, in many of the flame 
areas where there has been heavy 
fighting recently. After the Geneva 
Accords in 1954, many of the Viet 
Minh stayed in South Vietnam to in- 
filtrate the governmental structure ut 
all levels, and to prepare the way for 
an eventual communist take-over. The 
continued discovery of extensive tun- 
nels, arms factories, field hospitals, 
arms and food caches is evidence of 
the extent to which the communists 
have developed operational bases in- 
side South Vietnam. The moat recent 
discovery was the largo, division-sixe 
tunnel complex found by the 1st In- 
fantry Division, only 26 miles north 
of Saigon. 

The pattern of enemy combat oper- 
ations shows that the number ana in- 
tensity of battalion and larger-size 
unit attacks have increased every 
year since 1962, while the company 
and smaller-size attacks have de- 
creased. Terror and sabotage attacks 
also have increased steadily since 
1962. The terrorist attacks, which con- 
centrate on local officials, administra- 



tors, school teachers, health worker 
and police tiro aimed at 'the vet 
foundation of the mitioii-lniildin 
process. For example, in J 905, (hot 
were over 20,000 known Viet Con 
incidents of terror and over 4,0{H) it 
cidtmttt of sabotage. 

Hanoi is sending nmro men scut] 
because Him is the liottl way they hw 
to oiVnt;t partially the mobility an 
firepower advantage that our use t 
hnlicoplm-H, artillery and 'aii-powj 
given uii. Thin enemy strategy won] 
be dependent on lioth Ihu HiininHi 
they have slocked hi Smith Viet nan 
ami on milistaiiUiil iiifillnilitm of site 
items IIH weapons and niiinnitiitiitii, i 
could 1m a Htop-and-go nfl'air over 
long period of time, by ultmwtin 
their attacks with pnusra to relmi] 
their strength, 

Against the background which 
have outlined, 1 would lil(i to discus 
what in Iming done from the mililnr 
social, political mid economic vie 
points lo combat, communist njrsw, 
mon in Mouth Vietnam, The iniliUi 
operations appear lo domhiiite tf 
scents ut thi! prowmt lime, 1ml U 
other programs are going on concu 1 
rently. In hw report following I] 
recent trip through Asia, Snnntt 
Mansfield mud: 

"General Nguyen Cao Ky, HIE 

I'riinu Minister, rawgnixuH that i 

purely military solution Ui lh( 

problems of Vietnam is not |]nas!< 

me. Security and soda! niul TO 

nomitt reform, in his vfw, musl 

proceed hand in hiind in ortlCL' tc 

gain tlii! support of Uui people." 

However, it in also iwoKiiiwd thi 

with Uin osculation of llamii'H mil 

tary o.oivmiitmi'nt, Hmilli Vietnam 

micct'HM in gaining nud nwiiiluinin 

control of tlm Home D.OOO to 10,000 vl 

lagt'H in tho countryside ut depends 

in grim!, purl upon Iho micwss < 

military operations, (limvorsoly, t! 

social, economic mid ]i<>1Uiciil (in 

graniH, which Uiu military opcratiw 

aro Hupporting, aluo conlribulu to \\ 

success of mililnry operations. Seen 1 

ity muHt be provided in tins countr; 

side If thu mition-lHilldinu IHOCMSI 

(ire to movo forward. 

From our banes along tin; miatcoas 
finch IIH Da Nnnt? HIM! Cam Ki*h Rfl : 
and from our inland linsea at Saiga 
1'leiUu and An Kin;, the allies si 
extending their control over tlie su 
rounding areas to provid*^ a TO 
secure environment in which Vie 
mimeso nation-building can take pine 
It IB often difficult lo lie sure wha 
tho loyalties of a village lie, OF 
determine if the Viet Cong local mi 
voraivo organisation hns been d 
stroyed. 

Quo result of our buildup in suppo 
of tho Vietnamese effort Ima been t! 
United States-government of Victim 
capability to increase the number i) 
scope of search and destroy ojm 
tions. Tho Viet Cong aro boine hum 
down in areas where they had pro 
ously been safe from attack. The t 
cont joint American-Australian oper 
tions, in the Iron Triangle urea nor 
of Saigon, is a good example of t 



30 



March 



as was the 1st Cavalry Division's 
fight near Chu Pong mountain. 

Next I will point put some things 
being done in the social, political and 
aconomic areas, but as with the 
military operations, the exact prog- 
ress being made is not always easy 
to evaluate. Psychologically, the ar- 
rival of large numbers of American 
combat troops has had a positive 
Effect on government-held areas. This 
is seen in the improvement of morale 
in the government, in the armed 
forces and in the return of confidence 
among many Vietnamese civilians. At 
the same time we are being very care- 
ful that our actions embellish rather 
than detract from the basic premise 
that ultimately victory will depend on 
government of Vietnam efforts, civil 
as well as military. 

Concurrently, there has been a 
period of government stability which 
is essential if public confidence and 
support are to be maintained. This in- 
creased stability not only contributes 
to the effective prosecution of the 
war, but also makes it easier to carry 
out the necessary economic, social and 
political reform programs. After the 
fall of the Deim government, the 
pacification program to bring politi- 
cal, economic and social organization 
into the hamlets lapsed for awhile. 
Besides the renewed rural reconstruc- 
tion program, which is regarded as 
a more thorough and realistic effort 
than before, other programs to im- 
prove the welfare of the people are 
under way. For example, a program 
to redistribute 700,000 acres of land 
to 180,000 farmers is under way. It is 
generally recognized that it will take 
time to make any substantial political 
gains among the uncommitted part 
of the population with these pro- 
grama, but wo have to be patient also 
and, as Captain Snruill wrote home 
before he was killed: "For us to 
despair would be a great victory for 
the enemy." 

The Vietnamese government has 
also instituted a resources control 
program, to restrict the flow of sup- 
plies to the Viet Cong, but in many 
parts of Vietnam, particularly in the 
fertile and densely populated Delta, 
there is plenty of food for everyone. 

Senator Mansfield, in his report on 
January 9, summarized the basic 
problem that has accompanied the in- 
crease in military operations by both 
aides : 

"The ravages of war and terror- 
ism, however, are taking a toll of 
the country's productive capacity. 
Rico fields and rubber plantations 
in areas that are being bombed and 
fought over no longer produce their 
contribution to feed the people and 
to nourish the economy. Fledgling 
enterprises in outlying areas, cut 
off from supplies and from markets 
by interrupted communications, 
wither and fail." 

Note thut the social, political and 
economic programs which I have men- 
tioned are being planned and carried 
out by the Vietnamese government, 
though wo are giving all the advice 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



and assistance we can. But in the long 
run, the Vietnamese are the ones who 
must make these programs work and 
it t is the Vietnamese government 
which must eventually win the loyalty 
of the people, regardless of the 
amount of assistance we and other 
nations provide. To this end, Ameri- 
can assistance to the people is chan- 
neled through the Vietnamese govern- 
ment. 

Though our military forces have 
conducted many recent military oper- 
ations, they are also contributing to 
the effort to win the loyalty of the 
people. For example, military medics 
treat thousands of villagers, besides 
teaching them basic first aid and 
hygiene. Soldiers in many units have 
contributed funds to support orphans, 
to help refugees and to help villages 
adjacent to their areas. Our heli- 
copters have flown countless missions 
of mercy to evacuate refugees, to 
carry food to isolated areas and to 
evacuate wounded civilians. These are 
only a few of the many contributions, 
which when added together, are bound 
to have a beneficial effect on winning 
the people's loyalty. The language 
barrier is a hindrance at times, but 
acts of decency and human kindness 
speak for themselves and people are 
pretty much the same the world over 
in their response. 

I do not have any doubt but that 
our nation has the means to support 
our commitment in Vietnam, both in 
terms of manpower, money and per- 
severance. Our nation and many of 
our allies are all too familiar with 
what the preservation of our freedom 
and our way of life have cost in the 
past, No one can place a price tag 
or a ceiling on the cost of freedom 
and I believe the eventual freedom 
of a large part of the Free World is 
now being decided in Vietnam. 



We must all realize that the Chinese 
communists' challenge to the Free 
World in South Vietnam today is an- 
other example of their insatiable 
greed for power and world conquest. 
What is our answer to Mao Tse- 
tung's announced strategy of eventual 
world conquest? The Honorable Cyrus 
Vance, our Deputy Secretary of De- 
fense, provided a straightforward 
answer in a speech last October when 
he said : 

"... we agree that Mao's clear 
intent is that his brand of commu- 
nism should eventually surround, 
encircle, and finally cut off and de- 
feat western Europe and the United 
States. 

"But we disagree that that is 
going to happen. Our defenses are 
strong, and we remain alert and 
ready for whatever the future may 
bring. But more important is the 
fact that the free nations of the 
world offer a better future for the 
individual, and a peaceful path to 
that future," 

We need a thoughtful appreciation 
of the real nature of the Chinese com- 
munist menace an understanding of 
their objectives and their philosophy; 
but equally important, as we have 
throughout our history from Lexing- 
ton and Concord, Bunker Hill, 
Chateau-Thierry, Guadalcanal, Nor- 
mandy and the Pusan perimeter, we 
must maintain the will to preserve 
our own ideals and beliefs, because 
as The Reverend Dean Sayre said of 
the current conflict in Vietnam: 

''. .. It is ... the momentary focal 
point of a titanic struggle to deter- 
mine in every valley of earth 
whether man can fulfill the image 
that God has imprinted on his brow, 
or whether he must ever remain 
under the bondage of blindness and 
'human chicanery." 



U.S.-U.K. Reach Agreement 

on R&D of Communications Satellite Project 



The United States and the United 
Kingdom have signed a Memorandum 
of Understanding which provides for 
participation by the British in re- 
search and development associated 
the U.S. Initial Defense Communica- 
tions Satellite Project. 

U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert 
S. McNamara and U.K. Minister of 
Defence Denis Healey signed the 
memorandum as part of a continu- 
ing program of joint cooperation on 
mutual defense and space research, 

'Under the terms of the memo- 
randum Great Britain will provide 
several ground terminals for com- 
munications tests and experiments 
using the U.S. Defense Department 
communications satellites, Costs of 
providing and operating these ter- 
minals will be borne by the United 



Kingdom. No charge will be made 
for their use of the communications 
satellites for these tests. The memo- 
randum also provides for a mutual 
exchange of data resulting from this 
cooperative program. 

The U.S. Initial Defense Communi- 
cations Satellite Project provides for 
establishment of a space system of 
up to 22 communications satellites in 
near-synchronous, equatorial orbits. 
Satellite launches are planned for 
this year. 

The U.S. Defense Communications 
Agency and the U.K. Office of the 
Assistant Chief of Defense Staff (Sig- 
nals) have been designated as the 
project offices to handle program de- 
tails and coordination for their respec- 
tive governments, 



31 



T F S 



T W T F S 



T W T F S 





1 2 


3 4 


5 


1 


2 3 


4 5 


6 7 








1 


6 7 


8 9 


10 11 


12 


8 


9 10 


11 12 


13 14 


2 3 


4 


5 6 


7 8 


13 14 


15 16 


17 18 


19 


15 


16 17 


18 19 


20 21 


9 10 


11 


12 13 


14 IS 


20 21 


22 23 


24 25 


26 


22 


23 24 


25 26 


27 28 


16 17 


13 


19 20 


21 22 


27 28 


29 30 


31 




2D 


30 






23 24 


25 


2fi 27 


28 29 


mjBMMfl 




J L -- 


Bran 








F *fflstekfei 


30 31 









SPEAKERS CALENDAR 



J 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 
OF DEFENSE 

Dr. Chalmers W. Sherwin, Dep. 
Dir. (Research & Technology), Office 
of Dir., Defense Research & Engi- 
neering at National Science Founda- 
tion and Richardson Foundation 
National Research Conference, 
Greensboro, N. C., March 26; at Re- 
search Applications Conference of 
the Office of Aerospace Research, 
Washington, D. C., April 5. 

Mr. Edward T. Cook, Dep. Dir., 
Defense Contract Audit Agency, at 
National Contract Management Assn. 
Symposium, Los Angeles, Calif., 
April 15. 

Lt. Gen. William J. Ely, USA, Dep. 
Dir. (Administration & Management), 
Office of Dir., Defense Research & 
Engineering, at Industrial College 
of the Armed Forces, Washington, 
D. C., April 7. 

Mr. William B. Petty, Dir., Defense 
Contract Audit Agency, at National 
Contract Management Symposium, 
Washington, D. C., April 1C; at Los 
Angeles Chapter Meeting, California 
Society of Certified Public Account- 
ants, Los Angeles, Calif., May 17. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Maj. Gen. David P. Gibbs, Chief 
of Communications- Electronics, at 
Armed Forces Communications Elec- 
tronics Assn. Meeting, Fort Mon- 
mouth, N. J., April 4-6; at Institute 
of Electrical and Electronics Engi- 
neers Conference, Fort Huaclmca, 
Aria., April 27. 

Lt. Gen. L. J. Lincoln, Dep. Chief 
of Staff for Logistics, at Industrial 
College of the Armed Forces National 
Security Seminar, Pittsburgh, Pa., 
May 19-20. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

RAdm. Eugene Fluclcey, Com- 
mander, Submarine Force Pacific 
Fleet, at Navy League Meeting, San 
Diego, Calif., April 11. 

VAdm, C. B. Mai-tell, Dir., Anti- 
Submarine Warfare Programs, Office, 
Chief of Naval Operations, at Amer- 
ican Ordnance Assn. Meeting, White 
Sands, N. M., April 20. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Gen. B. A. Schriever, Commander, 
Air Force Systems Command, at 
American Institute of Aeronautics 



and Astronautics Meeting, Cocoa. 
Beach, Fla., April 10; at American 
Ordnance Assn. Meeting, Washington, 
D. C., May 5. 

Lt. Gen. L. I. Davis, Commander, 
National Range Div., Air Force Sys- 
tems Command, at Institute t\f Navi- 
gation Meeting, Boston, MIUJS., April 
21. 

Lt. Gen. K. K. Comptoiij Dop. Chief 
of Staff, Plans & Operations, at I 
American Ordnance Assn, Medina 
Washington, D. C., May 5. 

Maj. Gen. C. H. Terlmne, Jr., Com- 
mander, Aeronautical Systems Div., 
Air Force Systems Comma mi. at 
American Ordnance Assn. Meeting, 
Washington, D. C., Mny C, 

Maj. Gen. B. I. Funk, Cornniftiick?, 
Space Systems Div., Air Force Sys- 
tems Command, at General Dynamics/ 
Convair, San Diego, Calif., May l]\ 
at Aero Club Meeting, Ilufl'nlo, N. Y-, 
May 20. 

Lt. Gen. T. P. Gcrrity, Dep. Chiff 
of Staff, Systems & Loffistica. t 
Armed Forces Day Observance, Sacra- 
mento, Calif., May 10; at Hrmiu??si'| 
Trophy Award, Chicago, 111., Wny 2*' 
at American Institute! of Industrial 
Engineers Meeting, Sun FrnnHsM, 
Calif., May 26-27. 

Gen. J. P. McCounell, Chief of Bluff, 
at Armed Forces Day Obscrvnnw, 
New York, N. Y., May 21. 



The Nuclear Planning Working 
Group of the NATO Special Com- 
mittee of Defense Ministers met for 
a two-day session on Feb. 17-18 at 
Washington, D.C., to discuss nuclear 
planning for the defense of the al- 
liance. 

Ministers attending the first meet- 
ing of the working- group were Kai- 
Uwe von HaSsel, Germany; Guilio 
Andreotti, Italy; Ahmet Topaloglu, 
Turkey; Denis Healey, United King- 
dom; and Robert S. McNamara 1 , 
United States, chairman of the group. 
Manlio Erosio, NATO Secretary Gen- 
eral and Chairman of the Special 
Committee, also attended. 

For its initial meeting 1 the work- 
ing group concentrated its attention 
on questions concerning planning 
with regard to strategic nuclear 
weapons. This included an appraisal 
of the process by which the threat to 
NATO is measured; consideration of 
the ways in which nuclear forces are 



on 



planned, procured and managed; dis- 
cussion of problems and procedures 
in the development of plans with re- 
spect to such forces as well as the 
command and control arrangements 
which govern them. 

The discussion of the strategic nu- 
clear threat against NATO and the 
forces available to counter the threat 
included a detailed examination of 
targeting procedures, planning with 
respect to allied strategic forces and 
an evaluation of what the various 
kinds of forces could be expected to 
achieve under different conditions of 
nuclear wax*. 

The special committee is a part of 
an effort to increase the participation 
of NATO nations in allied nuclear 
planning and policy. It was estab- 
lished by decision of the North 
Atlantic Council following a proposal 
made by Secretary McNamara to the 
Defense Ministers' Meeting in Paris 
May 31~June 1, 1965. 



The first meeting of the full com- 
mittee was held Nov. 27, J!)G&, in 
Paris, at which time three workir.g 
groups were established. The Special, 
Committee's Working Groups on In-' 
tellitfonce and Data Exchange ami on 
Communications met in Paris Vtb. 
7-9. These meetings and the meeting 
of the Nuclear Planning Working 
Group just concluded arc additional 
steps to improve and extoiul allied par- 
ticipation in planning with respect 
to nuclear force's, including strategic 
forces, and to ensure that tiKireed 
consultation concerning the decision 
whether to use nuclear forces can 
take place as expeditious]? ns nd- 
vanced technology will permit, : 

The Working Group for Nuclear 
Planning will meet next in London 
at the end of April. Recommendations 
reached by the working group will 
be submitted to the North Atlantic 
Council through the Special Com- 
mittee of Defense Miniatora. 



32 



March 1966 




March 23-25: Armed Forces Manage- 
ment Assn. System Effectiveness 
Seminars, Washington, D.C. 

March 24-25: American University 
Washington Conference on Busi- 
ness-Government Relations, Shera- 
ton-Park Hotel, Washington, D.C. 

April 5-6: Armed Forces Communi- 
cations Electronics Assn. -U.S. 
Army Eelctronics Command Sym- 
posium, Fort Monmoiith. N.J. 

April 11-15: Institute of Environmen- 
tal Sciences Meeting, San Diego, 
Calif. 

April 12-13: DOD-Nnlional Security 
Industrial Assn. Advanced Plan- 
ning Briefings for Industry, San 
Francisco, Calif. 

April 18-20: 19fifi Local mid Short 
Haul Carriers National Exposition, 
Sheraton Parlc Hotel, Washington, 
D.C. 

Anvil 18-21: Aerospace Medical Assn. 
Meeting, Las Vegas, Nev. 

April 27-28: DOT) -National Security 
Industrial Assn. Advanced Plan- 
ning Briefings for Industry, Wash- 
ington, D. C. 

April 28: Property Administration 
Assn. Annual Seminar, Hotel New 
Yorker, New York City. 

Mav 1-4: American Institute of Chem- 
ical Engineers Meeting, Columbus, 
Ohio. 



5: American Ordnance Assn. 
Annual Meeting, Wa shin gt on -Hil- 
ton Hotel, Washington, D.C. 

May 9-11: National Aerospace Elec- 
tronics Conference, Dayton, Ohio. 

May 10-12: National Telemetering 
Conference, Boston, Mass. 

Mav 11-13: American Helicopter 
Society Meeting, Washington, D. C, 

Mav lfi-20: American Society of Civil 
Engineers Meeting, Denver, Colo. 

May 17-19: National Security Indus- 
trial Assn. -Navy Anti-Suhmarine 
Warfare Innerspacc Conference, 
Washington, D.C. 

May 19-20: Southern Research Insti- 
tute "Membrane Processes for In- 
dustry" Symposium, Birmingham, 
Ala. 

May 21: Armed Forces Day. 

May 31-Jnnc 2: American Society for 
Quality Control Meeting, New York 
City. 

June 6-10 : Society of Automotive 
Engineers Convention, Detroit, 
Mich. 

June 7-9: Armed Forces Communica- 
tions & Electronics Aasn, Conven- 
tion, Sheraton-Park Hotel, Wash- 
ington, D.C. 

June 12-15: American Society for 
Mechanical Engineers Meeting, 
Philadelphia, Pa, 

June 19-23: Assn. of Industrial Ad- 
vertisers Meeting, New York City. 



MAY 

Symposium on Electrode Processes, 
May 1-6, in Cleveland, Ohio. Co- 
sponsors: Air Force Office of Sci- 
entific Research and the Electroche- 
mical Society, Inc. Contact; Lt, Col. 
M. D. Sprinkel (SRC), Air Force 
Office of Scientific Research, Tempo 
D, 4th St. and Independence Ave., 
S. W., Washington, D. C. 20333, 
(Area Code 202) OXford 6-8706. 

Bionics Symposium 1966, May 3- 
fi, at Sheraton Hotel, Dayton, Ohio. 
Sponsors: Aerospace Medical Re- 
search Laboratory, Aerospace Medi- 
cal Div.; and Avionics Laboratory, 
Air Force Research and .Technology 
Div. Contact: Dr. H. L. Ocistreichor 
(MRBAM), Aerospace Medical Re- 
search Laboratory, Wright-Patterson 
AFB, Ohio 45433. (Area Code 513) 
253-7111, ext 36108. 

Fifth Army Conference on Tropical 
Meteorology, May 6-C or May 12- 
13, in Miami, Fla. Sponsor, U. S, 
Army Electronics Command, Contact, 
M. J. Lowonthal (AMSEL-BL-MA), 
Atmospheric Sciences Laboratory, 
Fort Monmouth, N.J. 07703, (Area 
Code 201) ext 61691. 

Ninth Navy Science Symposium, 
May 5-6, at Departmental Auditori- 
um. Constitution Avo. between 12th 
and 14th Streets NW, Washington, 
D. C. Sponsor: Office of Naval Re- 
search. Contact: Robert J, Mindak, 
Office of Naval Research (Code 104), 
Washington, D. C. 20360, (Area Code 
202) OXford 6-1720. 

Annual Conference on Photo- 
graphic Science and Engineering, 
May 9-13, at San Francisco Hilton 
Hotel, San Francisco, Calif. Co- 
sponsors: Atomic Energy Commis- 
sion and Lawrence Radiation Labo- 
ratory, Contact: R. P. Micliaelis, 
Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, 
Berkeley, Calif. 

1966 National Aerospace Electronics 
(NAECON) Conference on. Changing 
Theme in Aeronautics and New Look 
in Avionics, May 16-18, at Dayton- 
Shoraton Hotel, Dayton, Ohio. Spon- 
sors: Institute of Electrical and Elec- 
tronics Engineers, American Institute 
of Aeronautics & Astronautics and 
Institute of Navigation. Contact: Mrs. 
M. S. Roberts, NAECON, 1220 E. 
Third St., Dayton, Ohio. 

JUNE 

Electromagnetic Windows Sym- 
posium, June 1-3, at the Georgia 
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga. 
Sponsor: Air Force Avionics Labo- 
ratory. Contact: R. Ireland (AVWE- 
3), Air Force Avionics Laboratory, 
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, 
(Area Code 513) 263-7111, ext. 65720. 

Fifth U. S. National Congress of 
Applied Mechanics, June 14-16, at 
the University of Minnesota, Min- 



neapolis, Minn. Sponsors: Air Force 
Office of Scientific Research, Office 
of Naval Research, Army Research 
Office, American Physical Society, 
American Society of Mechanical En- 
gineers for Experimental Stress 
Analysis, American Society for Civil 
Engineers, American Institute of 
Aeronautics and Astronautics* Amer- 
ican Mathematical Society, Society 
for Rheology and American Society 
for Testing and Materials. Contact: 
Maj. Lawrence P. Monahan, Jr., U. S. 
Army Research Office-Durham, Rax 
CM, Duke Station, Durham, N. C, 
27706, (Area Code 019) 280-2285. 

International Conference on Crys- 
tal Growth, June 20-24, in Boston, 
Mass. Sponsor: Air Force Cnmbridgc! 
Research Laboratories. Contact: 
Charles S. Sahatrinn (ORWPC), Ail- 
Force Cambridge Research Labora- 
tories, L. G. Hanscom Field, Badfrml, 
Mass. 01731, (Area Code 017} CB 
4~filOO, ext. 3298. 

Low Speed Aerodynamic Problem H 
Associated with Helicopters anil V/ 
STOL Aircraft, June 22-24, in Buf- 
falo, N. Y. Co-sponsors: U. S. Army 
Aviation Materiel Laboratories and 
Cornell Aeroauticnl Laboratory, Inc. 
Contact: John E. Yeatcs, IL S. Army 
Aviation Materiel Laboratories, Fort 
Eustis, Va. 23604, (Area Codo 70S) 
878-4101. (Rescheduled from Mni-ch 
30-April 1.) 

Second Rochester Conference on 
Coherence and Quantum Optics, Juno 
22-24, at University of Rochester, 
Rochester, N. Y. Co-sponsors: Air 
Force Office of Seienti fie Rescitirch 
and Air Force Cambridge Research 
Laboratories. Contact; Dr. M, C. Har- 
rington (SRPP), Air Force Office of 
Scientific Research, Tempo D, 4th 
Street and Independence Avenue RW, 
Washington, D, C. 20838, (Aroa Code 
202) OXford (i-44<M. 

Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on 
Quantitative Biology, thvtos undeter- 
mined, in Cold Sprmj? Harbor, N. Y, 
Sponsors: Cold Spring Laboratory for 
Quantitative Biology, Air Forco Of- 
fice of Scientific Besearch, National 
Institutes of Health, National Scion*! o 
Foundation and Atomic Energy Com- 
mission. Contact: Dr. K. V. ' Brown 
(SRLA), Air Force Ofllco of Scienti- 
fic Research, Tenrpo T>, 4th Street 
and Independence Avenue SW, Wash- 
ington, D. C. 20333, (Area Code 202) 
OXford 6-4181. 

JULY 

Solid Propulsion Conference, week 
of July 18, in Washington, D. C. 
Co-sponsors: Interaffency Chemical 
Rocket Propulsion Group and Amer- 
ican Institute of Aeronautics and 
Astronautics. Contact: P. J. Mar- 
tin, Chemical-Propulsion Information 
Agency, 8621 Georgia Avo., Silver 
Spring, Md. 20910, (Area Codo 801) 
689-7700, ext. 660. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



33 




DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



Contracts of 1,000,000 and over 
awarded during month of 
February 1906: 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

1 Bristol Mfg. Corp., Bristol, R.I. 81,047,263. 
321,490 pnirs of men's high rubber over- 
shoes. Bristol, Defense Pernonnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

J. P. Stevens, Inc., New York City. 
52,034,000. 600,000 yards of tropical wool 
cloth, Rockinghum, N.C. and Millcdecvillo, 
Ga. Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia. 

J. P. Stevens, Inc., New York City. 
31,245,000. 500,000 yards of polyester wool 
cloth. Greer and Wallace, S.C. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 

Pacific Mills Division of Burlington Indus- 
tries, Halifax, Vn. 53,829,076. 1,679,000 
yards of polyester wool cloth. Halifax and 
Clarksville, Va., and Raeford, N.C. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 

J. P. Stevens, Inc., New York City. 
52,529,000. 600,000 yards of wool serge 
cloth. Rockingham, N.C,; Greer, B.C.; and 
Mllledgeville, Gn. Defense Personnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia. 

Pacific Mills Division of Burlington Indus- 
tries, Inc., Halifax, Va. 31,640,000. 400,000 
yards of wool serge cloth. Raeford, N.C. 
and Clarksville, Va. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 

4 Enterprise Wire Co., Blue Island, 111. 
S'i.040,6<10. 368,000 colls of concertina 
bfii'bed wire. Blue Island. Defense Con- 
struction Supply Center, Columbus, Ohio. 

7 Burlington Industries, New York City. 
81,422,600. 700,000 yards of tropical khaki 
worsted material. St. Pauls, Fayetteville 
and Greensboro, N.C. Defense Peraonnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 

B U.S. Steel Corp., Cincinnati, Ohio. 51,298,- 
44G. 108,690 spools of barbed wire. Donora, 
Pa.: Joliet, 111.; Dulnth, Minn.; Fairfield, 
Aln.; and Pittsburg, Calif. Defense Con- 
struction Supply Center, Columbus, Ohio. 
Doyle Shirt Mfg. Corp., New York City. 
SI.693,134. 611,240 men's cotton poplin 
shirts, Doyle, Tenn. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 
Putnam Mills Corp., New York City. 81.- 
087.600. 250,000 yards of herringbone twill 
cloth, Atlanta, Ga. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 

9 J. P. Stevens Co., New York City. $2,. 
187,180. B22.000 yards of wool serge cloth. 
Rocklngham. N.C.; Greer, S.C. and Mill- 
ed gevi He, Ga. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

peering Milliken, Inc., New York City. SI,- 

8 W\, I? ' 00 , ynrda f tropical wool 
cloth. McCormlck. Johnston and Pendle- 
ton, S.C. Defense Personnel Support Gen- 
ter, Philadelphia. 

n ~5' G V C 1 lt 5, I J DiviBl n t Rnylon Fabrics, 

New York City. ?3,164,800. 3,300,000 yards 
of cloth. New York City. Defense Person- 
nef Support Center, Philadelphia. 
~5if* e ^TtIle Corporation of New York 
City, J1778 ,247. 1,900,000 yarda of cloth 



Burlington Industries, Cramerton Mills Di- 
vision, New York City. 81,888,906, 2,150,000 
yards of cloth. New York City. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
J. P, Stevens, Inc., New York flltv *i 
614,787. 1.703,000 yards of S3. New vS'k 

Peraonnel SuppMt Center - 



?nw Sn Ine ".i NeW ?i* 9'^- $1.948,664. 
2,062,000 yards of eloth. New York City. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia, 

jEnn? 1 laC J' N f W York OIty ' n,783,46G. 
7 i 13 A? V ard , f c ? tton ard n y'on duck 
cloth. New York City. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 



14 Prcstex, Inc., New York City. $1,210,000. 
600,000 yards of cotton nnd nylon water 
repellent cloth. New York City. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
Rnylon Fabrics, Inc., New York City. ?2,- 
484,000. 1,200,000 yards of cotton and 
nylon water repellent cloth. Now York 
City. Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia, 

Putnam Mills Corp., Now York City. $1,- 
640,000. 800,000 yards of cotton and nylon 
water-repellent cloth. New York City. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phil- 
adelphia. 

Choctaw Mfg. Co., Silas, Aln, $1,383,488. 
647,040 pairs of men's white trousers. 
Silas. Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia. 

Putnam Mills Corp., New York City. $1,- 
699,950. 2,476,000 yards of wind-rcslntant 
cotton poplin cloth. New York City. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

IB Pembroke, Inc., Egg Harbor City, N.J. 
$1,224,000. 46,000 men's wool overcoats. 
Egg Harbor City. Defense Personnel Suit- 
port Center, Philadelphia, 

16 General Aniline & Film Corp., ntnjshnm- 
ton, N.Y. 82,740,021. 106,838 packages of 
radiographlc film. Binghamton. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
21 Pembroke, Inc., Egg Harbor City, N.J. 
S2,42Q,141. 80,691 men's wool jersey eoata. 
EEB Harbor City. Defense Peraonnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia. 
Chlcopee Mfg. Co., Division of Johnson & 
Johnson, New Brunswick, N.J. 81,680,160. 
2,210,000 yards of non-metallic, plastic in- 
sect screening. New Brunawick. Dcfentin 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
Rodana Research Corp., Bethesdn, Md. $1,- 
123,624. 1,780,704 ntropino automatic in- 
jectors. Bethesdn. Defense Personnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia. 
Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., San Jiinn, 
Puerto Rico. S3.GOO,19G. 43,600,000 gallons 
of JP-4 jet fuel. Defense Fuel Supply 
Center, Alexandria, Va. 

23 Southern Athletic Co., Knoxvlllc. Tonn 
$1,680,463. 266.740 pairs of meW cotton 
wind resistant trousers. Knoxvtltc. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
"~f3SyV.Hl 1 ' Inc ," N , ow , Y ork City. $1,020.178, 
1 .u' 3 11 ytl ^ 19 , of o" ve <ll> cotton duck 
cloth. New York City. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 
26 Southern Petroleum Co., West Memphis 
Ark. $1,496994. 4,011,400 gallons of noil 
stabilizer. West Memphis. Defense Per- 
sonnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
28 Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Akron, Ohio. 
$7,179,478, Nylon membrane for runway 
and taxiway surfacing. Akron, Defense 
Construction Supply Center, Columbus, 
unit). 



ARMY 

r C . " 9 Wtillom , n City, Okla. 
,,6. Construction work on the Pino 
Lreek Dam and Reservoir, Oklahoma Proj- 
ect. Engineer Dlst,, Tulan, Okln. 
Mason & Hanger, Silas Mason Co., New 

Jn CI H' 1J S3 ' 637 T i 4E ?,' Detonators anil 
90mm cartridges. Burlington, Iowa. Am- 

3312 fill Procm ' enient & SuPPly Agency, 
General Motors, CMC Truck & Conch DM- 
te/ 1 ^ Ml ? h - *M.9B7 Dump 

nS w" tlnc \ T Al ; my T(vnk Automotive 
Lenter, Warren, Mich, 

-i Louisville Kv 2 . 



' "-!;*"-. n om 

Tank Automotive Center, Warren, Mich, 

E !w n j u f 1 S n8e ,,9 Mp " Division of East- 
? n J Co " K1 "Baport, Tenn. $13,300,- 
tfnn P anC '^^Kingsport. Ammun - 
tlon Procurement & Supply Agency, Jollot, 



Del. 

, and 

mn* *cf efo ? dl . Va> Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 



34 



Locklcy Machine Co., New Castle, Ts. ||, 
430,738. Demolition kits. New Castle, A--. 
niuntiini I'roeurwmeiit & Supply Afai/ 
Joliet, III, ' 

Ccncral Motors, Allison IHv,, Indlnnnr<lh, 
$2,21*5,0^0. 'J'raiiHmi.Haiona for vnrtons vs l i 
t:\QH. Indiiinnpoli,). Army Tmik Aulomtlhi 
Contci', Wnrren, Midi, 

ftcncrnl Motors, Alllnnit Dlv., ImlfanafAlh, 
S6,CIO,a30. TrniiHinlflHtiniB for vnrJoiLa \-i\i 
clow, IniiianaiiDllii, Army Tnnk AuloniHi.i 
Center, Wnrrun, Mich, 

-Medico ImliiHtrltH, 1'jtlstori, PJI. tJ.i:),. 
000. Mclal partw for ordnance poiniiflntvj 
of the 2.7B" rnoltet. Vltttn, Amniunliri 
I'rdciii'eim'iil & Supi>ly AKti^y, Jolld, 1! 

Ciinlincntal Motorn Cor|i Mimhrwun, MH 
SI, 81)11, Dfili. Knftini! iiaHcmliUfo flnd oonlife 
L-I-B for Iho MHH recovery v*hJplfl. llusl* 
jton. Army '['unit Automotive Cenht, 
Warren, Mich. 

.Stownrt Warner Corn., I.cHianon, In<!, (!,. 
541,808. fiOmin pnijcait, I,cliiiii(in. Ar:.. 
niunttion Proc.nreniciit ft Sii]i|'!>' Affett/, 
JolieL, III, 

IlniiHon Machinery Co., 'I'lffon, Ohfci. II.- 
3711,018. 'I'riiRk mmtntofl ctnnca. TiffiTi. 
Army Mobility Kquipnivnt Cuider, Si 
Louifi, 

Intcrnntionnl Harvester Co., Mel roue Ft it 
111. $1, (51)7.358, 1)1 dlc/iol cni-ltiD dflvfi 
luaderii. Liberty vJl IP, III. Army Mnlililj 
Rfiulinnent Center, St. Louis, 

fjnodyear Tiro & Ilubhcr Co,, Alirnn, Cb'^ 
$2,370,130. Track filioe nssnmltlleH nnil rsi 
for the M10H nml Mlfll) poinlml veTiicb. 
Munt;i>, Ind. Army Tnnk Autnm&tivoC*:., 
tor, Wnrron, Mich. 

Slnndnnl ProduclH Co., Olevclnml, Ohi-j 
S2,48a,7!i8. Track Hhoe nsiiL-inWIcu for 1l< 
M108 nnd MIDI) cimnlmt veliiclpa. P1 
OHnton, Ohio. Army Tank Aulomttiii 
Canter, Warren, Mich. 

Frueliniif Corp., Fuller Ion, Cnlif. Wfr- 
1112. lli-ton (uniihiblinis llnhtrrs, Kullit- 
ton. Army Mobility Knuiiiniont Oiltr, 
Kt. Lunifl. 

ficnernl Time Corp., 8(nnifnr<l, Cnnn. !l, 
1574,040. Ordminflii ttemw. Htnrnfonl, CMI. 
and Euclid, Ohio, Ammunition PrMuif- 
ment & Supply AKoncy, Joliet, II!. 

llooiiiff Co., Morion, 1'a. $1.803,474. COT- 
piinonta for the CII-47 liclleopiov. Mnrtcc, 
Army Aviation Materiel Cloinninnd, Si, 

IjOUill. 

3 MncDonnld nnd Kruno, Inc., nnd Iliinlinr 
ton Kiifflnccrinff & Cnnslrucdon Co., Mir.. 
troHo, (Inllf. $5,302,103. Work on l 
Angeled County DrnliinKe Area Prolat 

. Industry, Cnllf. Knulncer Dial., to 
Anitelefl. 

Cnnnillnn Commcrclnl Corp,, Ottnwo, Csc- 
mlft, $1.020,000. Doppler nnvJkfition ti 
(AN/A3N-04) and comiiotienta (AW/Ara- 
1QR). Ottawa. Army Electronics Commiin!, 
Von Monmontli, N,J, 

4 Drnvo Corp., PlttfihnrRli, Pn. $13,W,S!* 
Work on Arkanaafl llivor nril TrltuHTlt-S 
Arkanans nnd Oklnhnmn Project. Fi1 
Smith, Arlt, Engineer Dint,, LOB Anedw. 

KnlBor Jeep Corp., Toledo, Ohio, *I,S8T,8J* 
C-ton trucks wilh Kovernment fiifnislica 
englnea, South Horn), Ind. Army Moblliiy 
Command, Wnrron, Mich. 

RCA. Cnmden, N.J, $1,208,400. UsM 
woleht portable radio acts nml repaii 
parts. Cnmden, Army Electronics Conv 
mnnd. Fort Monmouth, N.J. : 

EPhflco Corp., Philadelphia. S10.0DWM 
Phnae II of an Integrated Wide 
Gommun ten tlon a System. Plillitde 
Army Electronics Command, Fotl 
mouth, N.J. ] 

Page CommunlcntJon* KBiRlnetrs, Int-i 
Wnshlnnton, D.C, $20,000,000, Work ot 
Phase II of nn InUffrnted Wide Bind 
Communications System. WoBhinElon, D>0. 
Army Eleelronlos CommRntI, Fort Moa- 
mouth, N,J. 

7ITT Corp,, Nutley, N.J. (3,170,125. Jtepsir 
parts for the rnillo network syatcm, Trop* 
spheric Army Cotnimmlcntion Sraleni. 
Nutley, Army Electronics Command, Fil 
Monmouth, N,J. ; 



March 



Fegles Construction Co., Minneapolis. $2,- 
030,000. Construction of a contaminated 
or waste red water disposal facility and erec- 

tion of an administrative support facility. 
at the Joliet Army Ammunition Plant, 
Jollet, 111. Engineer Dist., Chicago. 
8 Remington Arms Co., Bridgeport, Conn. 
$14,880,761. fi.60 and 7,62mm ammunition. 
Independence, Mo. Ammunition Procure- 
ment and Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 
Drlllmation, Inc., Ccntcrllne, Mich. $1,- 
657,113. Bolls for M2 carbines. Center- 
line, Springfield Armory, Mass. 
9 Canadian Commercial Corp., Ottawa, Can- 
adn. $1,340,G(>7. Rsidio Sets. Grantlby, 
Quebec, Army Electi'oiiieH Command, Phila- 
delphia. 

10 Fnirchild Space nnd Defense Systems, divi- 
sion of Falrchlld Camera and Instrument 
Corp., SyosHot, N.Y. $1,612,116. Ordnance 
items. Syoiisct. Ammunition Procurement 
& Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 
11 General Electric, Burlington, Vt. $4,268,- 

000. Repair pnrtw for MC1A1 20mm KUHH 
and XM12 armament pods. HurlliiKton. 
New York Procurement Detachment. 

Coalh nnd COBS, Chicago, $1,028,872, Re- 
habilitation and modification of buildings 
for the Fifth Army Headquarters, Fort 
Sheridan, III. Engineer Dlst., Chicago. 

Grumman Aircraft Knuineerinj* Corp., 
Helh PaKe, N,V. 52, 675,415. Modern ha- 
lion of OV-1C aircraft. Stuart, Fin. nnd 
lleth PaKe. Army Aviation Command, St. 
Lou !H. 

14 Cadillac Gage Co., Warren, Mitsli. $1,125,- 
266. Hi'Ufl for the M2 carbine, Warren. 
Springfield Armory. Springfield, Maas. 

KG A, Cnmilen, N.J. $17,000,000, Olnasl- 
lied elite Ironies equipment. Cnmden. Army 
Klcctronicu Command, Fort Monmouth, 
N.J. 

Cubic Corp., Sun Diego. Calif. $1,4-12,683. 
Two Sequential Collation of Unnge ground 
stations. San Dieiio. Engineer Research 
nnd Development Laboratories, Fort llel- 
volr, Vu. 

IS Firestone Tiro & llubbcr Co., Akron, Ohio. 
4,860,841. Ilubbor track shoo assemblies 
(T107) for tile MHS vehicle. Noblciivlllo, 
Ind. Army Tank Automotive Center, \Vnr- 
ren, Mich, 

Spcrry Hand Corp., Bristol, Tenn. $1,423,- 
662. FUMH for the PKltSHINO weapons 
syslom. Itrltitol, Plcatinny Araonal, Dover, 
N.J. 

Hughes Aircraft, I-'ullorlon. Calif. $5,888.- 
460. Satellite communication!) torminaln 
(AN/MSO-40) (MAIIK-1H) together with 
equipment comitlliinco report!) and synlum 
summurles. Fuller ton. Army Electronic!! 
Command, Fort Monmoiitl), N.J. 

Olln MathlcHon Chomlcnl Corp., New York 
City. $1,111 0,1)00. Reactivation of prodiui- 
tion facilities fur production of ordimncu 
items and for operation and malntonance 
activities at Badger Army Ammunition 
Plant, Harnlwo, W!H. Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

-- A'ltcch, Inc., Pnrkerijbiirjf, W. Va., $1,407,- 
232. Tank and pump unlU. KllKiibuth, 
\V. Va, Army Mobility Knulinnunt Center, 
St. Louis. 

1G -Kaslcr Corp. and Gordon H. Hull, Inc., 
San llernardlno, Calif. $2,570,700. Work 
on tlio Han Gabriel River Channel Project, 
llollilowor, Calif. KtiKlneui- DiBl., I.OH 
Angeles. 

Dow Clicmtnil Corp., Mndlium, III. 51,- 
704,281. Manufacture of nil-field aluminum 
landing mats. Kansas City, Mo. nnd 
Madison. Army Avlntion Commnnd, St. 
Loula, 

Atlantic Research Corp., West Hanover, 
Mass. 3,000,000. A classified (uinntily of 
ordnance Items, West Hanover. Ficntlniiy 
Aracnnl, Dover, N.J. 

17 Western Contracting Corp,, Sioux City, 
Town, $1,887,830. Work on tho Chesapeake 
nnd Delaware Illvor Cnnnl Project. Uc- 
twcon Choaniicake City and Welch Point, 
Md. Engineer Dlat., Philadelphia. 

California Stovodoro nnd Dnllast Co,, San 
Francisco. 530,448,133. Stevedoring and 
terminal services for the period of March 

1, 1000 through Fcb, 20, 1008. Oakland, 
Calif, Western Area Military Traffic Man- 

t ngemont Terminal Servlcea, Oakland, Calif. 

Collins Radio Co., Richardson. Tex. $3,- 
800,000. Radio sots (AN/ARC-54), Rlch- 
nrilson. Army Electronic!] Commnnd, Fort 
Monmouth, N.J. 

Matson Tcrrnlnnln, Inc., San Frnnclsco. 
$14,808,410. Stevedoring nnd terminal sow- 
Ices for the period of Mnreh 1, 1000 



through Feb. 29, 1968. Oakland nnd Ala- 
medn, Calif. Western Area, Military Traf- 
fic Management Termlnnl Services, Oak- 
land, Cnlif. 

18 University of Illinois, Urbana, 111. $1,200,- 
000. An additional 12 months work on a 
scientific research program. Urbana. Army 
Electronics Command, Fort Monmouth, 
N.J. 

Electronics Modules Corp., Tlmonium, Md. 
$1,600,000. Classified electronic compo- 
nents. Timonium. Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Fort Monmouth, N.J. 

Marvel Mfg. Co., Washington, D.C. $1,- 
069,633. Various propeller and rotor blade 
balancing kits for fixed and rotary wing 
aircraft. Caldwcll, N.J. Army Aviation 
Materiel Command, St. Louis. 

Standard Container, Inc., Montclair, N.J. 
51,888,886. Boxes for packaging ordnance 
items. Homervillc, Ga. Frankford Arsenal, 
Philadelphia. 

Magnnvox Co., Urbnna, 111. $1,676,000. 
Maintenance items for radio sets (AN/ 
VIIC-12). Urbana. Army Electronics 
Commnnd, Fort Monmouth, N.J. 

Remington Arms Co., Bridgeport, Conn. 
$4,004,984. Carton packed 6.0mm cartridges. 
Bridgeport. Frankford Arsenal, Phila- 
delphia. 

21 Spcrry Hand Corp., New York City. S2,- 
090,517. Loading, assembling and packing 
ordnance items. Shreveport, La. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 
111. 

International Harvester Co., Washington, 
D.C. 51,882,030. Various types of tank 
trucks. Birmingham, Ala. "Army Tank 
Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 

Ford Motors, Dearborn, Mich. 81,068,690. 
Tank trucks of various types. Dearborn, 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Warren, 
Mich. 

A. O. Smith Corp., Chicago. 58,416,119. 
Ordnance items. Waco, Texas and Mil- 
waukee, Wls. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Joliet, III. 

Macblolt Laboratories Corp., Springdale, 
Conn. 51,000,000. Classified amount of 
imago Intcnsifier assemblies. Springdale. 
Army Electronics Command, Fort Mon- 
mouth, N.J. 

2.1 Chrysler Motors, Detroit. $2.782,813. Cargo 
pickup trucks. Warren, Mich. Army Tank 
Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 

Ford Motors, Dearborn, Mich. $2,140,614, 
Cargo pick-up trucks. Dearborn. Army 
Tank Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 

Olln Mathleson Chemical Corp., New York 
City. $2,104,040. Ordnance items. Charles- 
town, Ind. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

24 -llnytheon Co., Norwood, Mass. $3,860,006. 
Communications equipment. Norwood. 
Army Electronics Command, Philadelphia. 

General Motors. Detroit. 32,356,006. Diesel 
engines for the M648 vehicle. Detroit. 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Warren, 

American Machine & Foundry Co., Brook- 
lyn, N.Y. 86,614,483. Ordnance items, 
(iarden City, N.Y. and St. Paul, Minn. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joliet, 111. , . , 

Serve), Inc., Burgess Dattcry Co, Division, 
Freeport. 111. $2,2GG,G63. Batteries for 
portable radio sots. Freeport. Army Elec- 
tronics Command, Fort Monmouth, N.J. 

ACF Industries, Inc., St. Louis. $1,078,- 
R60. Ordnance items. Olivette, Mo. Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joliet, 111. 

General Dynamics, Rochester, N. Y. 
31,800,000. Radio teletypewriter sets. 
Rochester. Army Electronics Command, 
Philadelphia. 

26 Harvey Aluminum Sales, Inc., Torrance, 
Calif. $0,633,279. Loading, assembling, 
and pnckine of ordnance Items. Milan, 
Tenn. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Jollet, 111. 

Holllduy Construction Co., Greenville, Ga. 
1,031,274. Woi-k on the West Point Dnrn 
and Reservoir, Georgia and Alabama Proj- 
ect. West Point, Ga. Engineer Dist., 
Savannah, Gn. 

Western Electric Co., New York City. 2,- 
240,000. Improved modification kits for 
the NIKE HERCULES weapon system, 
Burlington, N.C. Army Missile Command, 
Redstone Arsenal, Ala. 

American Machine & Foundry Co., Brook- 
lyn N.Y. $1,806,847. Fin assemblies for 
ordnance Items. St. Paul, Minn. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 
III. 



R. G. LeTourneau, Inc., Long View, Tex. 
$7,140,016. 760-pound bomb parts, fin as- 
semblies and packing crates. Long View. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Jotlct, 111. 

Maxaon Electronic Corp., Great River, 
N. Y. $1,377,848. Components for 20mm 
cartridges. Macon, Ga. Frankford Arsenal, 
Philadelphia. 

Amron Corp., Waukesha, Wis. $1,110,618. 
40mm cartridge cases and specinl tooling. 
Waukesha. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

28 FMC Corp., New York City. 53,110,992. 
Classified ammunition. Newport, Ind. Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joliet, 111. 

Canadian Commercial Corp., Ottawa, On- 
tario, Canada. 52.708,151. Advance pro- 
duction engineering for the titility carrier 
(XM671) and related kits. Montreal, Que- 
bec. Army Tank Automotive Center, 
Warren, Mich. 

General Electric, Utica, N.Y. 82.000,000. 
Classified electronic equipment, Utica. 
Army Electronics Command, Fort Mon- 
mouth, N.J. 

Specialty Electronics Development Corp., 
Glendale, N.Y. $2,038,713. Telephone sets. 
Southbridge, Mass. Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Philadelphia. 

General Motors, _Detroit. 51,132,600. M114 
armored reconnaissance carrier engine nnd 
transmission assemblies. Flint, Mich. Army 
Tank Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 

Eugene Luhr and Co., and Midwest Con- 
struction Co., Nebraska City, Neb. $1,156,- 
957. Work on the Port Arthur Hurricane 
Flood Protection Project. Port Arthur, 
Tex. Engineer Dist., Gulveston. Tex. 

Beech Aircraft Corp., Wichita, Kan. 81,- 
809,850. Guided missile targets. Wichita. 
Army Missile Command, Huntsville, Ala. 



NAVY 

1 Beech Aircraft Corp., Wichita, Kan. $2,- 
078,500. KD8B aerial targets. Wichita. 
Bureau of Naval Weapons. 

EDO Corp., College Point, N.Y. $1,071,- 
888. Field change kits to Improve the per- 
formance of sonar equipment used on- 
board submarines. College Point. Navy 
Supply Center, Norfolk, Va. 

Poloron Products, New Rochelle, N.Y. 
$1,663,836. Fin assemblies used with the 
MIC 82 MOD 1 general purpose bomb. 
Scranton, Pa. Navy Ships Parts Control 
Center, Mechanlesburg, Pa. 

P&H Construction Co., Evansville, Ind. 
51,036,711. Construction of an industrial 
annex at Naval Avionics Facility, Indiana- 
polis, Ind. Dir., Midwest Div., Bureau of 
Yards and Docks. 

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Akron, Ohio. 
31,391,600. Rubber inflatable life rafta for 
use on MSTS vessels. Akron. Navy Avia- 
tion Supply Office, Philadelphia. 

West ing house Electric Corp., Baltimore, 
Md. S20.620.000. Classified development 
effort related to Fleet Ballistic Missile 
Weapon System. Baltimore. Special Proj- 
ect Office. 

2 Southern Stevedoring Corp., Norfolk, Va. 
$2,176,628. Stevedoring services at tho 
Naval Supply Center. Norfolk, Va. Nnval 
Supply Center, Norfolk, Va. 
3 Litton Systems, Inc., Woodland Hills, 
Calif. 57,691,938. Airborne navigation 
computer aet components. Salt Lake City, 
Utah; Duluth, Minn, and Woodland Hills. 
Bureau of Naval Weapons. 

Westinghouse Electric, Baltimore, Md. ?13,- 
498,698. Airborne radar seta for the Air 
Force. Baltimore. Bureau of Naval 
Weapons. 

Vitro Corporation of America, Silver 
Spring, Md. 310,198,776. Engineering 
services for the TERRIER, TARTAR and 
TALOS missile systems. Silver Spring. 
Bureau of Naval Weapons. 
4 Otis Elevator Co., Stamford, Conn. 3,- 
643,000. Sheridan/Shillelagh weapon sys- 
tem trainers. Stamford. Naval Training 
Device Center, Port Washington, N.Y. 

Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp., 
Bethpage, N.Y. $4,400,000. Support FY 66 
procurement of A-6A aircraft. Bethpnge. 
Bureau of Naval Weapons. 

Curtiss-Wriffht Corp., Wood-Rldee, N.J. 
$1,462,818. Engineering services for Navy 
end Air Force J-66 aircraft engines. Wood- 
Ridge. Bureau of Naval Weapons. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



35 



Cor " Washington, 

S onstriietion ""' towi^ 

rS f r the 1> Sub- 

Complex ' Navy-Marlne 
oratory, Annapolto, Md. 

Div - B f ** 



t , _-. ?3,8G4,440. Com- 
the AN/AHC-5 radio set. 
avy Purchasing Office. 

11^,1 f. ^i?Ti on ' pn - ?G,3B3,920. Rotor 
l^n N ^ H / U , H ~ 4 6A helicopters. Mor- 
Mpliln Aviation Supply Office, Phila- 





ft u ftnn 

060,000. 



h, P.. 

and furnish reactor 
for nuc '<*r powered 
u n f Ships. 

.' Ncw Ywl( City- ?'- 
ional marine geophysics re- 

n , Yopk Citv - Bermuda, and 

iiS n ?c omce of Nftvfll *""* 

*""**' East Hartford, Conn. $1,- 
parta for nirernft engines 
Bnd T - 2n flirc "- East 
Aviatl " S>' Offleo. 

flift w CQ S B Co " Great Neck > N - Y - 
i.' tl En Steering services for TER- 

I ? Sle fll '? ? ontro1 rfl(!F "' ^ts. Great 

Neck. Ptui of Naval Weapons. 

Intcrnntionnl Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 
C m a ; i * 1 -,467. Portable trans- 
mi LLci-s-reoclv era ami accessory kits. Cam- 
'^'J; I 11 , 11 '??" of Ships. 

" E' llln ft h K l rnS ctl ,, Cor P" Kin * of Prussia, 
F" 1 ,hi' A^/o t U^ EIev 1 ation drivc assemblies 
for the AN/SPG-B5A/B radar and Instal- 
lation tools. King of Prussia. Navy Pur- 
chaninB Ofllce, Loa Angeles 

Gjicrett Corp., AlBcsearch Mfg. Co. div., 
Phoenix, AH*. $1 000,862. Spare parts 
for BBB tur bines Phoenix. Navy Aviation 
Supply Oftlca, Philadelphia. 

gBoefnvLoM Morton, Pa. $3,607,077. Spare 
pnrts for CH/mi-48 helicopters. Morton. 
jTnyjr Aviation Supply Office, Philadelphia. 

Vnl %& c r. r ? f fc ' EaBt Hartford, Conn. S3,- 
880,805. Sa,110.8&7. Miscellaneous spare 

U'ttli S5 T? 7 r, Pl y l0/lflW opines for 
p-105 and P-106 nil-craft. East Hartford. 
Nnvy Aviation Supply Ddlce, Philadelphia. 
H> Kdo t,ari)., GolloKe Point. N.Y. SS2,flOG.- 
337. Sonnr nets for Installation in naval 
mirfncc Blilps. College Point. Bureau of 



nw o CoT|) " Wood-Ridge, N.J. 
fl.ODp.OBT. Spnro parts for jet engines 
used in A-4B/C nml AF-1E aircraft. Wood- 
K nvi? Av!llti n Supply Office, 



Aircraft. Long Beach, Calif. $2,- 
070,000. Bomb release rack systems for 
Navy ftfrornft. Torrance, Calif. Bureau of 
Navnl Wctiiiona. 

Southern BxlriMipm i nc>> Mngnolio, Ark. 
$l f 8BiJ,SaO. Alumlniim matting' extruaiona. 
Navnl Air Englneerlne Center, 



Mny Aluminum Inc., El Campo, Tex. $2,- 
117(1,050. 1'ftbrfcntion of aluminum matting 
extrtisloiiH. El Cnrnpo. Nnvnl Air Engi- 
ncerJns Cont-or, Philadelphia. 
WnBliln.8j.on Aluminum Co., Baltimore, M.I. 
$1,183,800. I'ubrlcaUon of airfield matting 
mid mnt nssemblies. Baltimore 
Air Enelnfiering Center. Phlla- 



14 



Company of America, Pitts- 
, Pa. $1,813,065. Aluminum matting 
exit-unions. Gi-eaaona, P B , a nd Lafayette. 
luil. Nrivnl Air Bneineerlng Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

Ford Instrument Co., Long Island City, 
N.Y. $2,380,000. Installment funding for 
RUH flro c&ntrol systems. Long Island 
C!Jt,y. Bureau of Naval Weapons. 

Louis Allla Co., Milwaukee, Wis. $1,313.- 
20. Addjtlonn.1 power supply units for 
Bitrfnco ship aonnr systems. Milwaukee. 
Diirciui of Ships. 

IVcBHnghQuao Electric, Pittsburgh, Pa, $3,- 
2T2,9GO. Dcaisn and furnish reactor plant 
com pone nta for nuclear powered ships. 
Pittsburgh. Bureau of Ships, 

Aircraft EnBineerlnir Corp., 
N.Y. 813,000,896. Increase of 
lonBT o 01 time effort in support of FY 00 
procurement of A-6A aircraft. Bethpngo. 
Bureau of Naval Weapons, 
Bendl* Corp., North Hollywood, Calif, SI,- 
045,028. Rodar nltlmeter systema. North 
Hollywood. Bur en u of Naval Weapons. 
Clovlte Corp.. Cleveland, Ohio. 82,000,000. 
Research & development on a guidance and 
homing control system adaptable to tor- 



pedoes. Cleveland. Bureau of Naval 
Weapons. 

Raytheon Co., Lexington, Mass. (1,200,- 
000. Research & development work on 
TARTAR missile control radar seta. Way- 
land, Mass. Bureau of Naval Weapons. 

Weatern Electric Co., New York City. $5,- 
724,474, Classified oceanographic research. 
Whippany, N.J. Navy Purchasing Office, 
Washington, D.C. 

American Mfg. Co., Fort Worth, Tex. 
$5,216,400. 500-pound bomb bodies. Fort 
Worth- Navy Ships Parts Control Center, 
Mechanicshurg, Fa. 

American Construction Co., Washington, 
D.C. $2,844,000. Construction of a com- 
posite medical facility addition at Andrews 
AFB, Mil. Dlr.. Chesapeake Div., Bureau 
of Yards and Docks, 

16 Lockheed Missile and Space Co., Sunny- 
vale, Calif. $2,600,000. Classified work. 
Sunnyvale. Special Projects Oliice. 
17 Simplex Wire & Cable Co., Newlngton, 
N.1I. $3.840.600. 1,345 nautical miles of 
undersea cable. Newlngton. Navy Pur- 
chasing Oflice, Washington, D.C, 

Westinghouse Electric, Pittsburgh, Pa. $2,- 
B3B.OOO. Designing and furnishing of re- 
actor plant components for naval nuclear 
powered ships. Pittsburgh. Bureau of 
Ships. 

Farmer Tool and Supply Corp., Denver, 
Colo. 51,153,400. Wing and rolleron as- 
semblies for SIDEWINDER missiles. Den- 
ver. Navy Propel Ian t Plant, Indian Head, 
Md. 

Kelaoy-Haycs Co., Philadelphia. 1,167,145. 
2.76 rocket components. Philadelphia. 
Navy Ships Parts Control Center, Me- 
chanlcsburg, Pa. 

18 Clovlte Corp., Cleveland, Ohio. $0,262,133. 
Shipboard sonar systems, including repair 
parts and engineering services. Cleveland. 
Bureau of Ships. 

21 United Aircraft Corp., Stratford, Conn. 
82.404,614. Spare parts for CH-G3A heli- 
copters. Stratford. Navy Aviation Supply 
Onice, Philadelphia. 

Astro-Science Corp., El Monte, Calif. $2,- 
321,236. Recorder/reproducers (AN/A-2H- 
IV). El Monte. Naval Air Development 
Center, Johnaville, I'n. 

General Electric, Washington, D.C. $21,- 
803,258. Main propulsion machinery for 
nuclear submarines. Lynn, Mass. ; Pitch- 
burg, Mass and Schenectady, N.Y, Bureau 
of Ships. 

PMC Corp., San Jose, Calif. $12,373,716. 
Detailed design, construction, test and 
evaluation of prototype assault amphibian 
personnel carriers (LVTPX). San Jose. 
I) u roan of Shi pa. 

Dcndix Corp., York, Pa. $2,108,974. Target 
detecting devices for TALOS missile sys- 
tems. York. Navy Purchasing Office, 
Washington, D.C. 

Poloron Products, Inc., New Rochellc, N.Y. 
81,037,805. Bomb fln assemblies. Scrnnton, 
Pa. Navy Ships Parts Control Center, 
MechnnicsburE, Pa. 

Hughes Aircraft, Culver City, Calif. $10,- 
000.000. Additional funding for the PHOE- 
NIX missile system for FY GO, Culver 
City. Bureau of Naval Weapons. 

International Telephone and Telegraph 
Corp., HarrlBlnirg, Pa. $1,661,198, Lead 
electrical wire for 2.76-Inch rockets. Du- 
cannon, Pa, Navy Ships Parts Control 
Center, Mechaniesbm-B, Pn. 
23 Hyilronmtics, Inc., Bloomflcld, N.J. $1,- 
305,080. Ball valve sets for POLARIS sub- 
marines. Bloomfiold. Bureau of Ships. 

Sangamo Electric Co., Springfield, 111. $2- 
603,218. Sonar sets. Springfield. Bureau 
of Ships. 

2.f Otis Elevator Co., Stamford, Conn. $3,- 
194.G59. Fire trainer units for the XM-36 
(Sheridan Weapon System). Stamford, 
Naval Training Device Center, Port Wash- 
ington, N.Y. 

2G York Corp., York, Pa. $1,324,740. Cen- 
trifugal air-condition units for naval ships. 
York. Bureau of Ships, 

Bethlehem Steel Corp., Snn Francisco. $1,- 
907,600. Completion of reactivation work 
on the Military Sea Transportation Service 
(MSTS) aircraft ferry USNS KULA GULF 
(T-AKV 8), San Francisco. Commander, 
MSTS, Pacific Area, Fort Mason, Calif. 



AIR FORCE 

1 Northrop Corp., Hawthorne, Calif. 21,- 
806,000. P-5 aircraft for allied nations 



under the Military Aim|,.im ,; u*! 
gram. Hawthorne. Ai-ninnnn, ! 
Div. (AFSC), Wriiihl-PoiiMs 
Ohio. 

Hughes Aircraft, Culver t'liy i *< 
200,000. Missile launch.^, 1,,,\>. f , 
craft. Culver City. AonmnnH. i 
Div. (AFSC), Wright-Pall..,,,,,, M 

Sperry Rand Corp., Chnil,.ti, ,.-, 
$5,506,000. Radar m>lu I,,, . ; 
130II and WC-135 iiln-nifl. rh, ; | - 
Aeronautical Syiilcmn in, 
Wright-Patterson AFII, ()hl 

Garrctt Corp., Phoenix, Aid t\ 
Starter and valve amii-mUI. .. [- , < 
craft. Phoenix. AenHimilknl >.,,! 
(AFSC), Wri K ht PnllrntMii ,M I. . 

Hughes Aircraft, Oulvri i \<., 
$3,600,000. Worlt on mi nil i,, s ,,f, 
sile guidance program. I'nUn > ''. 
terns Engineering (irinii.. |ti-.. 49 > 
vclopment Div. (AKMt!), V.,tt" i 
son AFB, Ohio. 

AVCO Corp.. WllmliiKli.i., .'.). = = 
000. Re-entry vehicle li-clitmt.^ i Y 
ton. Itallistlc Syntonui IMv, >M>-.> 
ton AFB, Calif. 

2 Thlokol Chemical (lorp.. |i r h> ' : 
180,000. Rcaenrch & di'vulu,,,, ,-- 
I MINUTEMAN nuilinfl. IM^V 
Utah. UnlllHtlc Hyin.-.in. JM, . 
Norton AFfi, Calif. 
3 -General Electric, Wi'iil l.im. w t 
782,875. 52,500,000. l'i-i..i'i. '' 
aircraft engines and I'niiiii.n,,- : , 
mcnt work. West I.VIID, '. -. 
Systems Div. (AFHtlJ, \Vri e M v 
AFB, Ohio. 

Kollsman Instrument (liirii.. I ! * - 
$1,317,382. Spnro imrlr. r... ( :. . 
surveying syHleimi. Klmlnno'. 
Robins Air Materiel Airn i M I ' 
AFH, Ga. 

Olln Mathicson Chmli'nl Cmii >< 
City. 1,868,088. llonlu-l |.,,i^'.- 
ville, Vn. Snn Antunin AIF ii* 1 *. 
(AFLC), Kelly AFH. 'IV* 

ITT Research Instltiilo, f!ii. t 
000. Operation of mi etfn . 
analysis center fin- n)it"'" "'' ' ' ' 
polls, Md. Electronli' Hyiilon 1 ) !'' 
L.G. IlanBcom Field, Mticn 

4 Consolidated Diesel Klirlrl* t'.. 
Conn. $2,022,150, Proilui'lli.ti ( : J . '. 
imwer gonernloni. KlucVt'in. <~ 
men to Air Materiel AITH lAt'J- 1 > 
Ian AFB, Cnllf. 

Aerojet General {'urp., !>"' i= < -' 
$4,055,18fi. Advani'i'il rilom' 1 '* ' 
pellant rocket onulncii. l> !' ' 
Force Plight Tout ('t'lUfC lAt 1 ^ 1 > '< 
AFB, Calif. 

7 lioclns Co., Semitic. W (*>!- t = 
ModernlKatlon of MINIMI M'.'. 
Knob Nostor, Mo, Ilitllhn. 'i.-i-. 
(AFSC), Norton A I'll, CntK 

8 Falrchild Killer Corn., \tt:^- ' 

32,100,000. ModliliralliHi n( i -: 
Hagerstown. Wanicr-Unl'ii " : 
Area (AFLC), lloltlUM Al II '' 

AVCO Corp., Wllmliiu ^'->- 

000. Design, dcvclii|iini'iii. !:! * ' 
tlon of ballistic lusm'tnulni' ,v '-t 
Systems Div. (AFHU), N't-H.. . ^ 

A. J. Industries, Inc., W ^ 
$1.122,000. ProdiiclliHi *.f ' * 

tanks for F-105 iilri-riiff, M V 
nautical Systoma Dlv. i-M-' 
Patterson AFI), Ohio. 

Ling-Temco-VoiiBhl, Inr.. tit'*-- 
J2,103,600. Modtlkutlim "f ' '' 
Greenville. Aeronaut IftM i" 1 '-' l: 
(AFSC), Wvlght-I'nlU'r""'! AS*' 1 

Hazcttlne Corp., Llltln N.- i, ^ 

S34. Production of rtunnun-i'* ' " 
mcnt. Little Nock, Wntr.-;^ ^ 
Materiel Area (AFI.C), K- ' " 

Stromberg Carlson ilori'.. I' " ! -"* 
$1.300,100. Prodiiullt.il n>t ;>''*" 
telephone communlcntlun* "i.>i"" 
cheater, Oklahoma Cllv Ait W*v." 
(AFLC), Tinker AFII, (}kt B 

VIewles, Inc., Holbrimk. NV H 
Production of porti\bl vH"-<-i* 
with related technical dam K ^ *** 
Holbrook, Aeronaultrnl fij*** 
(AFSC), Wright-Pfttmrwm A9" 

General Dynamics, Bun l*M" '"'* 
082,000. Work on ATLAS- Ausr** 
boosters. Snn DloRO. Ki-iS^* &*ifa 
(AFSC), Loa Angolos. 



36 



(JcHPrnl DynninlfH, [Inn IMoji.t, I'nllf. (U,- 
li;i,r>00, Mii.llflmtUin HiTvli'vii fur '.'.'.\ 
ATI, AH wliwllrn (11 tm mini In n rtfoitlry 
vi<li|i'lo ilovoli'iiriii'iil iiruitrum. linn J)lcmi, 
Iliilllntk Hyiitoiuii Dlv. (A)''H(1), Norton 
A I'll, I'ollf, 

II) l.rnr Hlcglrr, Inc.. (iriuul Itiuilitti, M It'll. 
ja.fiim.filfl. rimlm-llou i( nlivrnri. ImmliliiK 
cnii.IiilU'l 1 ". (Jinn. I Uni'l'ln, A.'i'Kii.iullcitl 
Hynlfiiiri Ilk, (AKMl!). Wi-lKliM'.Ul.Tnnn 
AMI, Ohlii. 

U lirnvrnl J'rerlalmi, Inc., l,ll(l Knlln, N.,1. 
tl.lllll.llllll, I'milm-liiiii i.r urimml impl'ml 
i'i|iill>riicrit. for ltn> *' 141 iifivlutillimul {'Kiii- 
im t IT. I ill 111' l''nlh. A iTi in mil li'iil llviiirinii 
hlv. (Al-'dCl. WrlKlil-1'HU.iiriou AMI, (llil... 
(iixntypnr Tiro & Uiitilmr ('n,, Aluini, Ulil.i. 
jl.tHifl.illHi, I'riMln.'tli ..... f \vli,..| ntiil l.uilui 

iirinciillillr" fi'f I' ! nlii'rnfl, Akrnii. Arm- 
ttniilli-nl HynU-mti Hlv, (AKIH!), \VHnt.|.. 
1'nlU'iniui AMI, Ul.lii, 

HopliiK ('., llrnllli'. Wnnh. (11.01, '/MM. 
Miillll.-nll ...... ( IM.U. nlrt-rnfl. tlrnllh-, 

Ulilllolli' Kynlrnm lllv. I A !';!< H. Nation 
Al'M. Cnllf, 

14 Ciifll"- Wrlalil Coni., W..it lll.lur. N.J. 
Ill, (Mill, unit, \VnrK mi ilin .l<wlu|.iiiiil ,,t n 
vn-lnrnl ttiiutil rtulBn nlrrrnfl rnuhiK. 
WiiiiiMtliliiii. A . 'i i m mil I'' n I Mvalfiinn Dlv, 
|AI''WM, Wrlnhl I'Mlr.nim AMI, Olili., 

If. ApriifliHilr I '(if 11., I'lrnrwnlrr, V U. 8V.',llM,- 
film. l'roil.n'lf..ii ..f nlr.'tod nllli,i.-t.-t, 
Illrnrwntrr. Af(i'liniil|i'nl l<f.ilrntn lllv. 
(AMIilK Wltuhl .|'flU*-im.)l Atll, tlhto, 

Alrrr*ft Aminnieiila Inc.. r ( .i'(in>avlll, 
M.I Bl,f,!4,r,il), I'l.Mlu.'il'.u ,.l uli.-n.rt 

fnilll ilut iv I lull r.|)ili.tnntl, <'. l rliriBvlllr, 

A'n'i'linuln'nl ilvniniiq 1)1 v, i Al'lil'l, Wriirlu- 
1'nllrtnun AMI. (Itiln 

til l.oi-tiliteit AlMrnfl. MniU-Mt), Cn. il.fl^'J,. 
M47, Himi 1 " |.nrio t-t '' lit nlirtufl rii- 
Ulitrit. Chuln Vinlo, fnlK, V.'BUI.T lt..t.fnti 
Air MninU-1 Aun (Arl,C), Ml<ln<i AMI. 
<!n, 

Uonernl l-tlcdrk, \V f at l.^nii, M". |il"i,- 
ll'iTi,IM|li, rr>!>tiifU"i) u( nlH'fnfl nnulura 
ti,t llm '!' .tn ni.it I-' !"i nil. roH. Wol l.vuii. 
Ar ..... mill.-nl Hioh-u.t, li|v (Ai Jil'l, WrtKhl- 
fnftrtn-.n Al-'ll. IMH.. 

IV Ninlli A Mi nli oti A'Ull^n, rHnu I'utfc. 

t'ttllf, JiS.li'iit^ir!!! ,| t ( cnulnca MKi.nl IT- 
nrnlt'li, I'niii'un I'nth Air I'nfo I'llulil 
|' F l lV,,i,-i lAMld, J-:,l,, n .U AMI. r,,|i| 
AFinl| i;[|tml t'nltt., titii'intKBiilii, t'ntlf 

M.fiHiJ.iMr. I't.-tn. IT., it -t iit-:Nlr; j.^fcri 

IHT.Ioia ninl iclnlr,! <1nla titii 1 ( nincliln 
Mteil-i" Air J.Indilr) Ate* <AM.<'1. Illll 
AMI, I'lflh 

1'tiict.i Atr'fnfi, r B.miiiui..!!, c.-hh n,. 



i'(.allli(J oaa!r.)ii> t'Bt n. in fell., I.. f !. ; .-|i ,.!.' 
Jl!.j[ci.>(i Mil- 1 A ill'). (. li Km 19 -..in 
I l.-|,t. M n!s 

hliMflUn Ali'IBfl, I'.itnn, llhln g^.H'Mt'.'t 
Mruhrii all. .11 &M.1 HinliiltOBiii r, .f M *' nl 
KMfl Tirlaa llhtnt'..tA (') Alt' Mftltficl 
AlEB tAI'l.ff, li.ifarr All!, Mb In 

IN Hl-ltHHift Mm It If |'iMBl. ML. Hi) sill 

VlCW, I'Bllf il.V.IM,,.;! )-,., :,,Hl- But.. 



I, C*li( 



mill n 
(.iillf, 



itritKrnniH. Viiinlonliei'tt AF1I, 

ro aynicnm l)|v. (AKSO), I,OH 



lit MxniiUiii VIEW UnllUll'' 

IMv, .Al;;i:, J,\.K,,II AMI, I'nl 



t.1li>ll>- 



uf 



't. H..?." AfH, t'u 



Air 

tin. 



M V 

Bn1 
fcife* 
* AIM, 



tn. 
it M(( 

Mtflfe 

lFt 
i 

Atmtfl, 



^!!' l ,", ni(hl l" lto ^'"trlo, HiiUlmoni, Mil. SI,- 
0(10.001). Dciilftn, flir|,mlloti mill tent ilf 
ilny-nlKlil Irlovliilun Hyntonm for nlRlitliiK 
ttii'Hi'l'i. llnlMnion.. HyHtcinn HiiKhuicrliic 
Iti-iitftri-li ninl 'IVlinii]Ky Dlv. 
.), WrlK)iM'itltcni(ti) A HI, Olilo. 
!'*" 1 , 11 V 0rp - Alltl Arlmr, Midi). !,- 
. Itiidiir lllnlit lent itroitrnm. Aim 
Hynlrinri Kntfliivcrhm (Jritiip, Ito- 
.111.1 'IVcliiKtloKy lllv. (AKHO). 
(l<ntl(>rniiii AK1I, Ohio. 



Arlmr 

ii<-n- 



Classified Info in 

Press Does Not Mean 

Materials Is Unclassified 

Omifilmwlly, firtii'lni in iu'WHpupcrH 
ur tnnl.i jnurniilii nmy itppmir to cnn- 
Uin inriiniiiilinn which Iti I'luwiiflcil. 
Mniiii'tiini'it tht'ci. nrljclcn iiurporl to 
I"' I'tllHiil nlntrini'lltil l>y hlgli-lovol 
.illlriiilji. (Mlicr tiitii'ii Uu\v inny lie 
wrll nuiccivi'il lull Uiinlllchil HllltlyHi'll 
hy h'i'linlnil wrllcni mid jounutliMlit. 

rnhlinttinii nf iiifdrniiititin ilm>n not 
iifrr-sritrily nii'iin (linl, It IIIIM lii'i-ll (li'- 
clii'i-iilicd. Aliv rniil nil-Ill wlilrli nj)- 
pi'iirji In In- luiiii'il tin iilllrial ttllnvv- 
i-niilil riini|iruiniiii! 



Aiiymii' tlmlinK In tin- pulilir prcfm, 

lillirlrit u'lili'll lillVr lilt* ll|lpl'nnilll'li 

nf i'.'ii(iiininjr rluH.'illlcd iiifnrnmtirm, 
In invih'il tn inilnnit, Itn- item tn tin 1 
in-iiii"4 Army, Ntivy ur Air Korcn 
i. 111.'.' willi whii'li In- dni'ii 

'I'ln- tiiUi-Ii' M.!it*lf i-iuini't ltd 
li.'d I. ni Uu> Inuitiiniltiil 
fin- I'ihnilinii nliMiilil lii'in- I'l 
MHU'liiii)-::! v.'hi.'li nhinv idiiinty thiit, 
t)i"V tin- "l.-nliiliv.'," Tin. |)O|) rltutnl- 
H.-dtli'ii iTiil'Iinii'.' inn.'it In- fidlnwcd 
lii'iuliitH ffccijit of nfllriiil wni'd. 

!HI|I |mtlry cullti fur rcvUHvliiK 

*'St*i)in(f 1-rrUlily I'llllHliticiltitll^l wlll'll- 

. V.-I H |iMn<lttly rluMMiili'ii mTui'mallim 
i.-ltitiiiH in inilHitiy niutti'i'M in initili 1 
inllitlf, Ttihi I't'vit'W I'litlu-iicvH lintll 
tin' piildi^linl ninl t'i'Utlt'd irifonnulion. 
Tin- siHiUTtt iiiiint In- ItlmiUnVd or 
vcrim'd. \i t'xpumuv tif clumilllt-d In- 
f.MiMiitlHii JULH tirniri'i'd, potmlltlo 
tlnui:iK<* Hninl In- iiiwstm'd Ulttl p) 1 )!- 

u'.v Mr corri L ctlvi' 
n wiihiii nlllcinl ciri'li 



Procurement Catalogs 
Available to Industry 



containing forecasts of 
pliinnod mn j or procurements for a 
Iwulve-month period in tho bearings, 
nuiliilH, rufitiTnorti and electrical wire 
and cable commodities have been pub- 
llBhi'd by the Dofenae Industrial Sup- 
ply Center (DISC) In Philadelphia, 
I'iv, 

Th<( cutuloffH will bo published 
(liiarterly to include latest informa- 
tion and are available U) interested 
induHtrieu and distributors. They are 
l)i!iii|? itublished in accordance with 
the DISC policy of providing the In- 
(UiHtriul community with ns much a<l- 
vanced infornuition as possible for 
planning purposes. Forecasts are 
bailed on the latest available informa- 
tion at the time of publication ami 
aromihjOKt to modification. 

Copies of specific catalogs may be 
obttiint'd by writing to tlie Director- 
ate of Procurement and Production, 
Defense Industrial Supply Center, 
700 Hobbins Avenue, Philadelphia, 
I'a. Hllll. The commodities of intcr- 
i'!it iihould lie si>eeifl(!(l. 

DIKC is a field activity of tho I>- 
fcmie Siipjily Agoncy and purehtiHitt 
liuhiHtrial ty|ie IteniH for the Armed 
I-'orci 1 . 1 ). TlusHo items include bearing, 
hlod( and taelde, rig^iiiK 1 and filiiiRH, 
I'upe, liable and fitting. H, hnrdwni-e 
mid abratiivi!, fiisteimrM, metal barn, 
iilieelji and iihape;i, and electrical wire 
and cable. 



Zero Defects Handbook 
Published by DOD 

DOD Handbook 41RB.12-H, "A 
Outdo to IfJoro Dofoctft," recently cnmo 
oft tho proBH and is now being dls- 
trlbuted throughout Govnrnmont and 
InduHtry, 

Tho new publication provides guid- 
ance for planning, Implementing and 
mwtalnhiK K<ro Dttfocts programa. It 
In available for purchase from tho 
Superintendent of Documonts, U. S, 
{{ovornment Printing OfHco, 
lon, D.O., for 20 cnnta. 



DEFENSE PRIME CONTRACT AWARDS 
TO SMALL BUSINESS 

(Amounts in Tttounnmls) 

July-Dec, 1905 July-Dec. 1904 
Piwumncnl from All FIrmB $15,128,683 $11,762,808 



I'nwurcmml from Small HunJnoH 
l*rvnt Smnll UuiilnoM 



3,182,205 
21.0 



2,462,213 
20.0 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WASHINGTON. D. C. Z03OI 



POSTAGE AND FEES PAID 



OFFICIAL BUSINESS 



NORAD Catalogues 



The U.S. meteorological satellite, Tiros OT-3, placed in orbit 
by a three-stage Delta vehicle from Cape Kennedy, Fla,, Feb. 3, 
marked the first time 1,000 objects have been orbiting in space 
at one time 

Shortly after the satellite was placed in orbit it was redesig- 
nated ESSA-1 by the National Aeronautics and Space Adminis- 
tration. 

Designed primarily to provide continuous data for operational 
and research meteorological purposes, the satellite is the eleventh 
in the U.S. Tiros program. 

Officials at North American Air Defense Command'a (NORAD) 
Space Defense Center, the agency given the task of catalogueing 
all man-made objects in space, stated that of the 1,000 objects in 
space, 971 are orbiting the Earth while 29 are deep space probes. 

It has been estimated that by 1970 there will be between 5,000 
and 7,000 man-made objects in Earth orbit. 

The Space Defense System includes a global network of radar, 
radio and optical sensors supplying NORAD with tracking infor- 
mation on all satellites while maintaining a complete information 
catalogue of space vehicles. It determines orbits of space objects, 
keeps a schedule of satellite positions and predicts future positions. 

The Space Defense Center, operated by the Air Defense Com- 
mand's First Aerospace Control 'Squadron, has catalogued a total 
of 1,982 objects, although only 1,000 are still in space. The others 
have either decayed or have been intentionally deorbited, 

They include 209 orbiting payloads 162 belonging to the United 
States, 41 to Russia, 2 to France, 2 to the United Kingdom and 2 to 
Canada. 

Space debris or junk the rocket packages and other bits and 
pieces of vehicles that have come apart constitute the remain- 
ing objects. All of these are catalogued by the Space Defense 
Center. 

The NORAD satellite-tracking system is multi -Service, composed 
of Air Force, Army, Navy and Canadian Forces Air Defence Com- 
mand sensors with civilian scientific agencies contributing data 
on a cooperative basis. 

Through the Space Defense Center at Colorado Springs, NORAD 
exercises operational control of the two main military elements of 
the system the Air Force Spacetrack and the Navy Space Sur- 
veillance System. 



Overclassification 

of Documents 
Expensive And Wasteful 

Overclassincation of docu- 
ments can be both expensive and 
wasteful as well as time consum- 
ing because of the extra care 
which must be taken in han- 
dling this kind of material. 

To save dollars, contractors 
and agencies are urged to re- 
view classified papers in their 
custody frequently to determine 
if they are overclassified. 

When possible, overclassified 
material should be downgraded 
or declassified. If the holder of 
overclassified material is not au- 
thorized to perform this action, 
it should be referred to the office 
of origin or to the contracting 
activity, with reasons and rec- 
ommendations, 

When classified documents are 
no longer needed get rid of 
them. This can be done by re- 
turning them to the contracting 
agency, downgrading or declas- 
sifying when authority to do so 
exists, or destroying them. How- 
ever, be sure they are disposed 
in an authorized manner. 

Remember, also, when prepar- 
ing a document that is based on 
a classified document, the paper 
doesn't have to be classified un- 
less it actually contains classi- 
fied information. 



Volume 2 No 4 A l i! 1966 




;IANT SECRETARY OF 



IN THIS ISSUE 

Di-f.'iitu 1 huliii'lty Ad\ii>'H> CuiMiril 

Tin' 1'lnn'ii^ Mlin.llr Synl.'in: 1'rrpiit ini: I'"" Tnimitnnv, 
All Alinl) 'ill' nf 1'iml Inl'm liuili'Ml Kt'pnitri 
'flic Anin'fj Si'iiliM Srii'iillllf Aihl'tiiiri 
'I'wn Step l-'nrnuil Ail\i>i titiiin; : A t'm.i' Illfitmy 
N\y Hc..ii!iini/i M Mulvi lid Cuiiitnunit Sliurliui- 

DEPARTMENTS 

Almut IN-npli- 

Hltiliii>;ni|itl,v 

Mpi'iilii-Ki 1'nlriulni 1 

I'r.iin ill i' Spi'iilu-in Uu-itniiit 

Mrctlll^n llllil Svlllptmitl 
( 'ulrliiliU "I I''.V i'Hf " 
NMI.-II r'i l-ill 



DIAC Fills Important 
Advisory Role to DOD 




C>rit" II. 



ttf 



Si-xl nu.i.lh II..- lit-h-ii^- hii|H*iy M\\\\i I'M.mnl "ill >.. (MM, M-.a.. .ll. 
Hi. nuni.il -. ...iHhli^hr.i in p.MU.I.- it tmtim hi wlih-h Drpiuhiu-ni ..I IM i M .1- 

IHHIMU'^ ni.lll'it-x mill IM.U'llM-. .',,11 hi- ,H,n.',-u'd ,,( IM|I HKHl.tK.-IUt'Hl l''V.-h<, 

||,i, HMtTltvi- t- IH-IHK i"i'l '" '!"' lH'l'll "' '1 ' ti.a r (Hrn-nl <illil llHhiH > ; 

\\tih ih.< ...MiiHiH-tl HHit(M.ri ..( 1-ul.ll.- i.lriifil ru-nihu-n y.lltiiK I" ^ * '"| 

Ihf n.unrtl untl it*. VM.rkh.K KIHI.. thr HI AC MM IllltiiK iin|Hrlni 

,nh (( \ mil- in tin- >mr iiltr.ul. 

( VIUM K, \ i 

U i;t^ t.l 



(Hyde Hiitlnncv 



The Defense I ndu: it ry Advisory 
(Inuncil fHIA(l) met mi I'Vhniary IH 
null I!) I'm- Ilie twelfth lime since it. 
wan established Uy IK)I) Directive 
Mlllt) ,;!;{, da led Mny '.'M, I !HV,i. 

II. secniM an approprinle lime Lo 
Inki- a brief look at I In- i-onnc-JIV or- 
Kaiii/ntimi, momliei'!ihip nnd nc-livilies 
liince I In- I'Vhnmry moelinj'; wns the 
llrsl fur six new memhei'ii an well nsi 
fur ils Mrennd I 1 ' si Till ivt- Si -ere I nry. 

Tin 1 ;iix new members uf Ilie council 
are : 

( I 'red Ilnreh, I'resiidenl and ( 111 Jo I" 

* Kxceulive Olllccr, (ieiiend Kler- 

(l-ie Co, 
Kerniil (lordmi, Vice President, The 

HronUiinii linililiition. 
I) lintel Maniflilnn, President, Loci; 

lii'cd A Irei'iifl. ( 'orp. 
Donald Hidden, (Chairman and lYoi; 
idciil, Newport News Shiplmild 
iniV and Dry Duel; To. 
HIIHIT l,c win, ('liairninn a in I ITi-si 

dent, (ieiiend 1 lynandi's ( !orp, 
Noel It, i\h'l,ejiti, rhairman, Kilo 

The wrller mirceuded the, llnd, DIAC 
M \crutlvc Secretary, Samuel ( 'runny, 
in Ihe fall of I IN Hi und, an pn-viowdy 
lulled, the I'Vhriuiry niretiliK wa hi:i 
ilriil in thiii IJ " 



Hrcn-lnry uf 1 Icf^iiiu 1 
in tlic ('lininniin of Ilii' l>i'-< 
iVinu' hidnnl.ry Advinnry (linun'll. Tin* 
AllN'runti' (Iliiiinntin in AnttlnLunl Hue- 
ri'huy nl' Dci'i'itni' (IniilulliiUoiiEi and 
l,nj;i;i| ii'ii) I'iiul Ijrhiitiun, itn<E Dr. 
Itiil.i'ii Mi'Ulrr, I'n-nicli'iil. T11W Hyu 
IIJDII, It; Iiitlimlry Vii't? ( Ihiiifintin, 

Otlici' i mill nl r.v nn'inhi'rH, in nddi- 
l.imi In I he iirw uii'inlii'rn iiln'iuly 
linh'il, urr: 

Willltini Allen, ViTsiiili-nl, Tin* l!m l - 



tJi-oi-ffi 1 Hrinvn, ( 'hnlnnaii, 

and U'iu1. P ]nt'. 

<'nrti'r Ilin'Mi'H", ('litdriniui, Amcr- 

iniii Murhiiu- and l^oumlry t'o. 
Mulcwlm I'Yi'tfiiHtm, Ctmirniiui, Ki 
Coinniitlrc, The Honilix 



. 

I'liut <i tinn mi, I'lvtiii 



M. V, llllKldiiH, r< , . 

TliomnH ,}iivi i Hi riuiinniin, t're;nirtn 
1 M and Oliief l-lxeeitlive (Hiker, 

[ K) Northmp (!rp. 
!U (!. II, lu'llHtiidl, Chairinun, Hoard 
*' Pt nf Trnnh'1'ii, l.nijifilii'ii MuiuiK 1 '" 
u, tin-ul Iniililnle, 

O ,|, K. Kt-rr, I'lvjildfiil, Aveu Corp. 
,; ,h i rvi l,nui:ilnn t CUininnan and I'ren- 
P itlenl, CliieaKo, Kurk liillUld nnd 

-J riu-ilii- Ilailroad. 

! John I-HMi-ciUH', ('hainniiu and I'roii- 
yi iileiii, Ih'eMtier Indiifttrio^ 
,;,3 TliomiiH NicluilM, {'hsiirnmii, Msi-rii- 
(ivc roniiniUcc, Olin A" 

Dr. Kmumiel IMnrt', Vire 
I MM C' 



('. H. Thornton, Chiiirmnn and Chief 
Kxi'cutive Olllrer, l.itlnli InthiH- 

1'anl ^'isdnirl, tlinirniiin, Kiniince 

( loiineil nie.nibt-rn nre carefully :ie - 
li'clcd I'm- Iheir nliilHy I ti provide ex- 
pert, advice mi il mindier nf diviTHo 
mdijeet nreari and, luMire, ni'ti (-hoHi'ii 
I'rni'n a u'lde cniiiii sei-linn of the |H'i 
vale seelor (if Uie U. S. economy. 
Kidaliiiii uf nieinheni ii|iproxininlely 
one- third every I w> years hc.lpfi 
furl lie r to brondrn Ihis i-xpericaei 1 

lllllU', 

A word i>n the purposes nf Ilie 
eoiineil hi prolmhly uiirful liinre its 
role in udvisinjc (lie- l)e]iarhnenl of 
DefciiHi' on loi'islicii jinlii-y ma! tern in 
nut widely Known. DOf) Direi-tive 
ritJMI).'.!:! jilnh-ii thai tins mission of tin- 
ciiniK-il is In provide: 

* Tin- Secretary of Defence and hist 
lirini'ipal iniumK''mi'i'( ajcdstanbi n 
fnriini for the invsenUI ion of \\w\n- 



anil ur-rom|iHslinii>iLl:i lo n reprt'in'iiLn- 
tivr I'i'u.-iii :;ci'tioil of (U-IViun 1 ili(Ui:ilry. 

* Ki'preMi'nlntivi 1 :! nf iJcfViiiii- indiiM 
Ivy it fonini for dmnii-iiiiiiK dii-tTlly 
wi'lh th h jiriiiripnl exi'('ii!iv< i )i nf (lie 
l)r|nirt,nH-nl, of Dt-fVtiHi' thnr /uiKK' 1 ' 1 '; 
and I'uriiUnH 1 ! ivi 1 rrilH'inmii nf 



priicliceii from the viewpninl. of Iheir 
clVerl on del'eniie indiinlry. 

*A fin-ill |ioinl for tin- review and 
disricisimi of Ilie lindinK" of iinhi:ilry 




Mr. C:\yt\v liiilliinei 1 IH 
Wccrctai-y cif tin; Defi'iiHu 
AdvlNiiry Council. Prior t<i Mils |i- 
IHilnhnintl, he \VHM Dirt'clar uf Mnn- 
UKi'iut'iil fur M mined Space HiKliJi 
Nuliiinul Ais-rwnuiIkH urn! Spiicn Au- 
nihiiHtnilion. lies liulilH n It. A, iliKt'i' 
in PiillLlcnl Hck'ncu from the Univcr- 
Mily of lown niul a J. I>. dwnrci' front 
thai viniviTHlty'H Inw Hcliuol. 



HUEIl. V |T nni|,*i n u n n .IIIIMUH m- in> 

to (lie- iit,( dlit.ii ni nf Ihe Scrretn 
] >cfeiiM( l . 

Tlie coinii'il is orKnniy.ird ' 1I!|1 ' 
lions in at'conhince with KMII 
Order 110(17 K'>verninjv Llie forn 
und use of advisory mm mi I Im 
has met. mi jivtirMj 1 ,' 1 ' <"l" lhre<- 
each yenr );'enei'a!ly in tin 1 :l| 
fall nnd winter, 

The find. met!line; of Ihe in 
WHH devolrd primarily lo a '1 
s ion nf (iffvani/jilion mid wo 
procedures und Ihe nnbjei'1, an- 
which the council niiithl hi 1 of 
henelil, Suhiiequeat nii-elitin 1 :! 
heen I'onecnted with many iu 
nf <li)veninn!n(.-iihiMiry relnlion 
An n rtMiiiH, workable- iuin\ver:i 
nninher of (lie problem ureiui 
heen I'nund, nml Holnbiotiii fur i 

A freu,ueidly luiked iincdtioii i 
Ihe council riHuullv identille;; 
willi which it, nhollld he nincerin'i 
littw il conduct is ils work cunut 

Tnpie:i or iiiMiiesi prop<ise-d fd 
lUiSfiitni will) the coiiiiCLl by Ihe 
are niiiially Utised nil stall' n 
nuide witlini the Depiirt inenl, 
i-il meinliei'ii inny propose and \t 
views Imsed on nhnll 
ili!, indniil rial a!;i;ni-li 
>;i, or other j;i'ovi])!i altl 
in ilelilieriilhmH mi all imines, 
nndernlood that i-oimcil memlici 
t'esen ( no om- hut themsclveii. 
mi 1-iiine in fully idcnlilletl, c 
from the Depnrl.meid and iiidm.t 
hi'oi|;h( l.oKi-ther in i 
r Ip'ouii to advice mi a sd 
MinmortinK (Ti'oupn iit'i 1 
i/ed im linhecinniiille.e.'i (inv 
meinht't'.'i of (ho council) or 
in 1 wcirlunij' urou|i!i (niirimdlv 
din-cl, participation hy coum-ii 
licrii). Vlxce]!!. for certain nii|i| 



(In- in' 1 ' 1 '! 111 K" (l11 ' 
ijd.eiic-o nrici> Hie as,-iin;ne(l I in 
hern i-mniih-teil. In nnli'I' It* | 
for a (food wwlilnfr arnnus'nio: 
minder of jiernnini uiipniiilei! I 
of tln'in 1 fiiippoi'liiiK ltn"'l l!1 it 
lively fiiniill. 

I'erluipH MH- heiit way lo pi 
finnin Ihe ncnpe of Uie finuiiii 
livilh'!) in IhroiiKh mi idi-nl itii'lt 
a Tt-w of Ihe i-shilluK wurkinn 
and mihcnminillre!) r-nnfc-ntnil 
e-'iil. pulley inallern. Thejii' 
K"'""! 1 -' 1 " ll Ihc Ton 
m'i< 1-lvuhiaUon (CI*I' 
in'tim and Ihe <!(iiili i at:l,nv'n \\'< 
AVITHK** ShHi'f* ht Itiult (CWA! 
Kraut, IIM well an lailn'cmitnlll 
CimU'iti'lurn' lncle}ieiitlenl Ti 
KIV.u-l (CITI-!) tini! I'lll'eel, ..f I 
I'vneiin-iiteiil, Puliei<';i tin Prnliln 
arr 11 nlher iiiippurtiiiK K" 1 
DtA(! nifw iirtive. und one n: 
hi'iiHC fnriiieil lo inlvlne nil i 
incident Lo Ihe Totiil Tueluijj 
rurenieiil (Joncept. 1 

ThnmnhnuL ilH \vhli 1 umin? 
tevetils, the (tuutH-il'd iii'livi| 
(Insely eiMinlluaLed wllh llioHf 



ll'il /'<iifcii|/i' f'liiiri'iil," hy 
//. "IVrfiintf. Jr., (IUAF, I 

lliilli-tln, l''t:b, iStitt. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 




K. <'. OiildiTH, Jr. US\ 
Iep, Prilled Miiini|*i'r fur I'lmeniv 
]'- M IM/Plineiiix Weapon Sj-Nlein Pro] 
Oltiei' nl Chief ( f Nnviil 



Tin' nir war heine; wac.eil from 
Point Vanki'i' and Point Dixie In llie 
Soul ll ( 'lihia I'l 1 !! h:i:i fully viiulii'iil nl 
I he Navy "fi I'ni'l InTanre, i In run,; Ihr 
('..hi Win' y.-iu'ii. tif On 1 arl ninl urirniv 
of t-JirriiT u 1 a r fa iv. Vie I nam ami 1 1"' 
mi inert m 1 1 nl hi 1 )' ronl'roiiljil i*ni:i ul" i'<> 
ei-nt yetiMi hiiVe MTVed In iMntT:>riHV 
<lrani!tl i.'iilly I In 1 I'M el Unit enrrler 
hnin'il aviiilion in Unnly I'iilitMlnheii UN 
Htrn' of mir i''iiinl r y":i in inriiuil menu. 1 ! 
i.l' ||r>iihle iviipniltie. The emT'lil I'Vil- 
mil Imiljfel lUiliniinMimi, which con 
I nil HI i i'i|in>:ihi I'm- lln- pi > i 1 , 'fill MI i 1 1 uinl 
"Idinrf." needed |o t'Kpnml lhi;i enpa 
hiJily, ,'iliindti Jin it rjtivfiilly deHher- 
ntfil (ml iniMMiiil hi lln- reliunee thai 
I In- I Impart rue Ml nf 1 irfeiuie |ilmv!i; 
mi iinvjil avliilinn. Them* limlt'.rt iv 
i[ue:i1:i riinp.e fi'iMii u new .mielritr pn\v 
<'ivd i' in I h'l 1 . nhln tiolh I'i'phi''"' i in-Ill 
anil in*w nniilrl M in 1 m t'l, down I" tlie 
wiih' divrn;ily >!' Miitpnrt i'<jili|nin-nl 
nn. I (In 1 nnln and ln>llM nenli'il l<> 
Keep i)iir nirrier ntriKlnjr i'ornvi in 

i\!i nn iiii|nnlaril inj^ii-ilii-Ml in Ih' 1 
eivtllhilll y (ami, fri'ipfnl ly, I he acln 
alityl of iht> Hniteil Slide;*' inililitry 
iitreii|;lh, i-JU'h aiivraft I'Jirri.T |i>piv- 
tieiit'i cm expi'nnlvc, till-y^iu'ii-plUM 
t'JlptEill illVi'iilllli'lll. AN i|H- !ite|i to 
Wiii'l lln- niUNiniuin H'lnin on thlM in 
ve).tmr4il iltiriliJT the ili-einh' nl' lln- 
ISlVn'M, Ilii- Niivy in 1!W.! t'liimneiieed 
rhnenix intriiith' 
ii revoluCleilinry emierpl lhat 

in iii-iiul wJU'fniv, Th' 
di'Vflopini'Hl i:i 41 lilviUtMK fX 
f nn.' nf Ihi' wityn the Navy in 
pri'pariiiK fnr Iniimi'i nw':i eoiitlirt 
tnduy. 

,iai) Inh' tin* 
nv.'pl (All 

tn nnuv fnii'-ervnt iv.- upproni'lnvs lhat, 
at ri v'i* fM' <>iily iui'rrnifnl ru Hii|iri.vi'- 

i.yMrill!', AUhnilnh thi^ laller i'l.lir.:'- 
nf M* I loii i'i u li'UinHnK nllfi nalive in 
Ihi- mriejil llmiletl win- I'tivimmneml 
df rrlullvrly u!ii|>hlBtli'u(*-il ]tjw:l- 
liini. it ilot'M lint jirovidi 1 fnr ihi* enemy 
nf Ihi! future whu i|iiU |M>Htiihly inny 

With U Phncnix !.y<.U'in wu will 

U'iiek inuJllple nir tarni>tn ut 

ireiiu'ly Innjf rmiKi'M tl then 

und kill ut Unix r*K ""'I >' ll 

all in' r<tni-iliiuiii*tri wllh lit* 1 Niivnl 
TM(-LU-;il llulu .Sy^trm tNTDS*. Ill*' 



AJS nil nKKi' l '. i ' t ' Vl " 
culiii u.f iilrlinmi' 



'iii- TstHinil Dulii . l i v v!il''iii 
(, \TIIS), HIM! :;lnii ntnl jilmiv hus.'il 
tU'f^ncciL. A rfi|mhlllly ul" llii:' in:ii:in 
hull- will r.ivi' inir riirrifi' forciM in 
Die IUVO'M tin- al*ili!y 6< pf.ij*'"( <li>ini 
n;tn( nir Miin-nnnly OVHT ilijitnnl 
Mi'i-jiii junl tini|i)iiliiiiii:i uSijcrl i\v nrcit'i 
ami, |>t'rtui|i:i nnin- iinpnrlinilly, in 
junv ihniiiKh tin- I "('.' 1'iinj; 1 ' (l1 ' 
I 'linen IN mi:.!itli<s llutl. nir inti'Mvuhn 1 :; 
tiri- mil mil rnnj','(l liy rin'iny nii:i:iili'S. 
Alt- iv knu\\-|i'ilKr ol I hi' pri-.-ii'lirr nt" 
rjliirltis iiliolllil Ki-rvi" In tlctrr. 

A;s ll Wi'lijion ^yrilt-m rnliri'pl rflm- 
Jli\ liliTJilly r*i!ii- I'l'niii thi' !il':i ul 
Nuvy ii;i|)inifi.ui:i in Ilif l:ili- I'.iMl';- 

lu i- liiin- 1lii- pnni'li tif a luiii* rJiuiir, 

!.,i|i)iii,i-n!i'.l nir In nir mlc-nli- with n 
MiiiMiltii' jiitrrnri litnnrli pint t't in, in 
mi flfnrt hi i-xli'inS tin 1 fii'lin.'i tif i-ru 
Ifflinn ilrrlvi'd fi'inu nirltinir \\''':i|i 
(J HM in; l':(r !i:i |)Cni 1 tii'Jtti'li 1 fnnn lar.li 
I'.n'i'i- n-nlt-iM, TlnTtf jiripirnl iuii:i l"i'K 
I'l.rni tr; UM- KiiKli'/Mi'^'il'-i'l' riiiKi'nl 
wliit'li (in'.tnlftU'il u .'inli:i.niir liminrliinj-; 
plitH'i-nn in t'uli'r ( f.ivv III"' jiy.-ilfin 
Ihi* ins nlnlimi (mi 1 luilfcj fintr iifi>'fi 




Ciilit. K. '. ChllikTH. Jr.. IWI. IH 
U^|i. PrnjtTi MiuiiiKiT fin 111* 1 1'luii'- 
nix wt'U|iMii yti'm in I In- OIUtT nf 
Nnviil Mnli>rltil. Hi' bi-Ktni M imviil 
u n cuirit'i' Muhlcr pilitt HIM! 
ln'lil M-vmil ImiitirUtnl H"iK- 
lH In tin- Jldil nf inihHili> tt'Vt'l|>- 
l. Hi* win uu'itnli'il Ihc lA'RiiHi f 
fr hlw wiirk tin PiilnriH anil WWH 

f Ihe Xnvl 
U-r. 



;;ary for inaxinunn elVei-l ivi-in-j.; 
ryinj;; tin- Phnenix :iysleni d 
,'iiinii 1 jel, sucli a;; UK- pnvii-nt 
A -(i liih'iidi'i', vvmihl hi'Kiii In u 
iinah' tin- old Kiin'le/Misnih'fr '.'' 
lluwevei*, ill reeenl yeiuvs, tin- V 
sweep will|V "f the aei'nnnU 1 
ihii'iiiK l' v 1 I I hu;i heenini" a I 
Ihii:;, I'hnt'iiix in now under <1 
inenl aii Hie nniniliieii) sy;ilein 
Navy's vrrnion of I he \' Ml, 
Mill. The I'' Mill |irnviil.':i I 
ernfl plaU'orm vvilli nn l'!n);'l 
iiili'i-1 1 lypi' nf Iniler ell pahilit \' |i 
adili'il i'apnhilily nf {iU^liiini'tl 
. ,,inr MiiOll. 

The 1 wn liMJiic elenienl ;t i 
I'linenix liHJLiiih' Ji.Viileni ni 
A Wl! !> Airlinrne Mintiile Contf 
h'tti (AMCH) mid I In- AIM hi 
),tK>. The AMI'S *-un:iliil:i nf i 
ihipph'r I'lidnr an ihi primary 
neiliioi', n ]>Hl'Jl11el infrared (110 
iii'Miinr, u iinilU|nirpo:ic iliKiln 
pulei', unit iiMj;oi'iii1ntl i'inilr<'l u 
play ;!llli:>y:>l'i'rilH. The Hills. e ) 
rjidar iiyiUem re)H'e:ienl!i the itl 
linn nf yi-arn nl' develnpnient. ill 
miller tulien, ery.'ilni iHtern ninl 
iirniy nnleiuia 1i-i'hni<|ne!i nil 
llitl "iinjurnvemenlri in A I nnh 
nf the art heftH'e Hie Innjr rill 

A low nnine pai'iinii'lrie ampl 
Ihc iTi'eiN'er :n-elintl cnntrihulr'iL 
loii|* nui^e eiipahilily. Advnnc 
pier It'i'hlliiHien niiilse lonk-innvi 1 
iinnti:>illon |in:i:iit'le. A llesihl 
capin'ily coinpnt.er periult:; still 
tun Irai-K nf n !iU'K' nninhrr nl' 
nint aid'i Ihi 1 inh^iih* c.mlnil 

priorllle:* mill ill mi:i:s(le Ih'll 
AIM 'li-lA ini;.!iihvi nre iivnilu 
t|uie!i rein'tfnn laiiiu'h, 

Tlie lit IJIEV.H ili'lt'i't-M' <.:\<\ 
rhurnix rotnpikinml'i Ui<' A I 
o|ieratioii, ill nm jniirl iom ' 
rjuhu, ami jilmvil 1t it, Ihe 
ayfilein 1i:i:i tin' un^ulnr nv:nli 
i' nil I it. Ill" irulivtililit) eh' lit. 'lit 
t'liitl lluit. In tin 1 I'julur mini'! 
!! i a 'kiitKtf I "Up. All rrtnMety, 
:,ill)>;y; ; >li'Hi eaii emil I ihnt ll 
hull' Sitli'Vt'illiiure U'ln'tl Ihe i 
iti'eli]i'd with tiMueltii nl hi' 
The sienicnr iii I'jtpt'i'ltdly ' 
iltj/aill^'t rillliilt, Ilijih vilii' 1 ''! lurf-i 
ptv;ienl 11 very liniull ei'n^si. J-t' 
Ihe radjiv. 

|atn prnivri:iinK in 'he 
AMI'S in p.-rfm-iin-il in a j^-ii* 
pn;;e il!l-;itnl ninjpt'l 'T Mini 

memory rjipai-ily in an rvtn-Mi 
piurt )HieKrin<". Th- rnnHniU' 
triirk i>f l!ir|;<-l:i ih-leeled hy I 
white III' 1 raihir n.nUniM'-i Ii 
Maiieii iii (ire pro^i.-iiiirned 1 
i'siinpult'1' t-vnliiiit.!' ' ihreiii 1 -, \\ 
;-,teeriliK inl H ni'iniilit>ti for llu- ) 
|illilit:> U I'milpli'li- 1 liieliejd 'iitil 
(lie M('(l hy df:ii|-;i>nl'"n I'li'i 1 
hur.l ill' lav^i-t-i in :-ttindnril N ) 
lioh-ny, nil h:i:.eil on data (i 
either iiileiiiiitly by l'ti"eni' 



Dnfonso Induilry Bulletin 



Another important function of the 
Phoenix computer system is for it 
to run a continuous confidents check 
on critical system parameters and to 
indicate tactics to be applied in de- 
graded modes of operation. As a main- 
tenance tool, the computer conducts 
self-test and fault-isolation routines 
on the whole Phoenix system in order 
to isolate faults to a specific, replace- 
able unit. This would he done when 
tlit! F-111U is returning from a mis- 
sion and is the key to the expected 
short turn-around time expected of 
the F-lllB/Phoenix system on car- 
rier decks. The Phoenix computer also 
can direct, as alternate modes, execu- 
tion of any secondary missions as- 
signed to the F-111B, such as, con- 
ventional ordnance delivery. 

The Bureau of Naval Weapons is 
developing the Phoenix missile sys- 
tem through the combination of a 
coordinated program within its major 
field activities (see accompanying list) 
and a cost-plus-incentive-fee contract 
with the Hughes Aircraft Co. of 
Culver City, Calif. In general, the 
Bureau of Naval Weapons' field 
activities are responsible for ord- 
nance component development and 
continuing test and evaluation respon- 
sibilities. Additional support is being 
rendered by other activities of the 
Naval Materiel Support Establish- 
ment. Hughes has prime contractor 
cognizance over total system develop- 



ment, which includes fabrication of 
the AIM-54A missile and the AMCS. 
The Rocketdyne Division of North 
American Aviation, Inc., is principal 
subcontractor for the solid propellant 
motor; UNIVAC and Control Data 
Corporation have competing designs 
for the central data processor. Sev- 
eral dozen other subcontractors of 
varying specialties contribute to the 
total Hughes effort. The Phoenix sys- 
tem benefits directly from the Hughes/ 
Air Force-sponsored ASG-18/GAR-9 
air defense missile system develop- 
ment. 

Overall Navy control of the Phoe- 
nix development is proceeding under 
the relatively recent innovation of in- 
tensified project management eman- 
ating from an Office of Naval Material 
Project Management Office. In this 
case, it is the F-lllB/Phoenix Weapon 
System Project with Rear Admiral 
W. E. Sweeney, USN, the designated 
project manager, Phoenix equipment 
will bo furnished as Government Fur- 
nished Aviation Equipment to the 
F-111B aircraft, which is being de- 
veloped by the General Dynamics 
Corp. under the direction of the 
Air Force Program Director, F-lll 
Systems Program Office (SPO), Ma- 
jor General J. L. Zoecklcr, USAF. 
Admiral Sweeney serves as General 
Zoeckler's deputy for SPO operations 
at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, in 



addition to his duties as a Navy 
project manager. 

As a high priority, many-facelnd 
project, the development of Phoenix 
reaches deep into the technology and 
strengths of a balanced industry/ 
Navy team. Through the collective' 
efforts and perseverance of hundred.'; 
of people in those organizations,, the 
Phoenix missile system will meet its 
commitment to the Fleet. 




U, 



S. Navy P-1HB in flight armed with Phoenix missiles. 



Participating Bureau of Naval 

Weapons Field Activities in Phoenix 

Missile System Development 

Naval Air Development Center, 
Jolmsville, Pa. 

Renders technical advisory Cerv- 
ices to the project office and is re- 
sponsible .for developing handling 
equipment. 

Naval Missile Center, 
Point Mngu, Calif, 

Coordinates range support at Un> 
Pacific Missile Range and provid<in 
targets for contractor touts. Will con- 
duct the Navy technical evaluation 

(NTE) of the system. 

Naval Air Test Center, 
Patuxent River, Md. 

Coordinates Navy test efforts mid 
will conduct tests that evaluate the 

AMCS. 

Naval Weapons Laboratory, 
Dahlgrcn, Vn. 

_ Responsible for safety studies mid 
is developing the high explosive war- 
head and cartridges for the ejection 
launchers. 

Naval Ordnance Laboratory, 
Corona, Calif. 

Responsible for developing ihn 
missile target detection device, tho 
safe/arm device, tactical telemetry 
receiver and recorder. 

Naval Ordnance Laboratory, 
White Oak, Md. 

Responsible for developing spe- 
cial ordnance eqipment. 

Naval Air Engineering; Center, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

Determines ship compatibility re- 
quirements. 

Naval Ordnance Test Station, 

China Lake, Calif. 

Conducts rocket motor sled teals 
ami assists in defining bombing com- 
puter requirements. 

Naval Ordnance Plant, 
Louisville, Ky. 

Is developing missile packaging. 

Naval Propellant Plant, 
Indian Head, Md. 

Performs rocket motor propollant 
characterization tests, 



April 1966 




Chaunccy H. Dean 

Professor of Cost and Economic Analysis 

Air 1'Wcp Institute of Technology 

Wright-Patterson APB, Ohio 



Students at the Air Force Institute 
of Technology have frequently asked 
about Cost Information "Reports 
(CIR), the relationship of GUI to the 
Cost and Economic Information Sys- 
tem (GETS) and, in a broader sense, 
the need for DOD-widc integrated ex- 
ternal information systems. These 
questions provided the motivation for 
this article, which is intended to focus 
attention on CIR. 

There are five different reporting: 
formats comprising CIR. Defense con- 
tractors would be responsible for pro- 
paring and submitting one or more of 
the reports in response to a contrac- 
tual requirement. The managerial cost 
information to be presented in the 
reports would pertain primarily to 
contractual items procured by the De- 
fense Department from defense con- 
tractors. These reports, then, could be 
classified as being a part of the exter- 
nal reporting system, as differentiated 
from the internal reporting systems 
within DOD. 

While CIR is still in the talking 
phase, it appears to be in the final 
stages of. discussion within DOD. To 
understand more fully why the Cost 
Information Reports will soon become 
a reporting requirement, it is helpful 
to analyze some of the significant 
events leading to CIR. 

Events Leading to CIR. 

Is CIR just another additional re- 
porting requirement to be placed on 
defense contractors? What is being 
done by DOD to coordinate and con- 
trol the quantity and type of informa- 
tion to be reported by defense con- 
tractors on contracts ? To answer 
these questions and others, let's first 
examine the overall changes in the 
defense industry product and price 
environment and analyze their impact 
on management information require- 
ments within DOD, 

Much has been written about the 
significant changes during the past 25 
years in the defense industry product 
environment. The advent of jet pro- 
pulsion, electronic systems, ballistic 
missiles, satellites, space probes and 
spacecraft, all since the A-bomb was 
dropped on Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945, 
has focused attention on the dynamic 
technology in weaponry. 

During this same period, the 
changes in the defense industry price 
environment have been revolutionary 
rather than evolutionary. From the 
high production volume, low unit cost 
structure experienced during World 
War II, the pi-icing environment in 
the GO's has changed to a low pro- 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



duction volume, high unit cost struc- 
ture. While the A-bomb was the first 
billion-dollar weapon, it is now com- 
mon for a new major weapon or sup- 
port system (when tho expenditures 
for research, development, test and 
evaluation, acquisition of equipment 
and operations are all considered) to 
be in the multi-billion dollar class. 
The magnitude and trend of defense 
expenditures Tor research, develop- 
ment, test and evaluation, facilities 
and acquisition of capital equipment 
arc displayed in Table 1. 

The unparalleled changes in the de- 
fense industry product and price en- 
vironment, the significant increases in 
the number of variables and alterna- 
tives to be considered in military deci- 
sion malting and the high level of de- 
fense expenditures all happening 
within a comparative short time- 
sparked a tremendous increase in de- 
mand from DOD nnd defense industry 
management for both technical and 
financial information. Some have 
called it an information explosion. 

It is generally understood that the 
management information explosion 
within the DOD and defense industry 
has not always been orderly and co- 
ordinated in such a way as to prevent 
serious duplications and omissions. 
Types of information needed for de- 



cision-making purposes have not 
always been collected in the right for- 
mat and stored in data libraries. Also, 
information storage and retrieval sys- 
tems have not always been respon- 
sive to management needs. 

The expanded need for cost and 
related information pertaining to 
weapon systems and major items of 
equipment all designed to aid de- 
cision makers in making complex cap- 
ital acquisition decisions resulted in 
each of the Military Services and De- 
fense agencies establishing a wide 
range of different reporting require- 
ments for defense contractors. Pre- 
sumably, each new reporting require- 
ment was established in response to 
tho needs of particular management 
groups. However, understanding and 
uains the data provided from the dif- 
ferent information systems has be- 
come somewhat comparable to under- 
standing and using several foreign 
languages, Moreover, defense contrac- 
tors have had a very difficult task 
complying with the diffused reporting 
requirements. Consequently, it is dif- 
ficult for defense industry manage- 
ment to train personnel and maintain 
accuracy in estimating and reporting. 

Relationship of CIR to CEIS. 

The aforementioned developments 
produced a need for analyzing the 
many existing external information 
systems and establishing DOD-wide 
integrated information systems. The 
long-range objective would be man- 
agement information systems which 
are. integrated through common lan- 
guage and which servo the needs of 
different levels of DOD and defense 
industry management. An important 
step in this direction occurred on July 
7, 1964, when a DOD directive per- 
taining to CEIS, numbered 7041.1, was 



Expenditures for Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, 
Military Construction and Procurement for 
Fiscal Years 1955-1964 


(Millions of Dollars) 


Fiscal 


Research, Devel- 
opment, Test 


Military 
Construc- 






Year 


& Evaluation 


tion 


Procurement 


Total 


'65 


2,267 


$1,716 


$12,838 


$10,820 


'56 


2,101 


2,079 


12,227 


10,407 


'f)7 


2,406 


1,068 


13,488 


17,8(52 


'68 


2,G04 


1,753 


14.08S 


18,34.0 


'B9 


2,800 


1,9-18 


14,409 


19,223 


'60 


4,710 


1,626 


13,334 


18,070 


'61 


6,131 


1,005 


13,006 


2o,8;ii 


'62 


6,230 


1,34 G 


14,628 


22,199 


'63 


6,375 


1,143 


lfi,659 


24,177 


'04 


7,018 


1,022 


15,349 


23,089 



Table 1, 




Tin 1 Army .Srieal.ihV Advisory 
1'iini'l (AKAl't iiichidi'.'i i;niiu> nf tin 1 
INI I inn ',<( nin.sl disUiiK'Mished civil in n 
.'icienlistit, ediii'ii|or;<, industrialists, 
mill engineer!;. These turn are llir 
liciiinr ficit'iit ilir udvisnni In the Sec- 
retary 'if the Ai'iny. They provide 
I'linnsel nn lu'l'D malli-rs In (he Chief 
of Slall', til' 1 AfiiiiuliMil Srcretiiry of 
tin- Ai-my (I'ltl'l mill llir Chief nl' 
Research nntl Development, The panel 
itmlnlaiini n snutll rurr (al pre.-ieal, 
'.'.\ nut nl' '.'.it aalhnri/.eil) ul' in-live 
members mid n variable lui'Kor jrroitp 
of eiiiisiilliinlti ( approximately -10). 

ilnlli ini'ihlii'!;; illld I'nn.'illllmils life up 
pointed I'm' a twoyenr term, 'I'hi 1 
Panel Si'creltirinl. is I'limiiihed by lln< 

(Hill I" III.' Chief nl Ueiieiircll mid 

Develnpmenl, (OCKD) anit is loj'iiled 
ill (he I'cnl uifnn. 

Tn keep iibreniit nl' ihe Army K&D 
pruj'.raia, iiiemlicr:i nnv| three linnvi 
it year l''i'lirury, June and I iclnbrr. 
Mi 'ii i hi' rii in l roaimlliuiln tit lend an 
HI HI Hill inert illfr In ,| u IH\ On I hetie 
nivmiiniiii, jtcl ivilii'ti nl" M peri lie mili 
lui'y installations are vicwnl 11 n<) 
hi'i<'(laj','!i mi urt'jtfi i.|" purliralni 1 InliT 
i'!il an 1 ri'i't'i vnl, 

Ttiin paind, i-i-liildiiJird in Nnvrin 
her lili'l liy III.' lircrr-ljiry if Hit- 
A nny, WUM I n ini in an ti|itn>:i]ih<'ii' 
iif rudinilly m-n'li-rnlrd KA-M m-livi- 
lli'.'i. In.'itfjtil id' riipini: tvilli lipi-t'ilif 
tllliunilniy !l'll|linM't, l\'< tHl'lnliiTil {'ni'll'i 
<'tl'nrl,i mi cliatli-il^in^ the liilmcidi-ry 
Iriulri'M hi iH'ci'li'iuli' prnf-ri'iKi In m>\v 
iifra.'t. ll in hn|ii'il tlui! tliiii r<int'>-pl t 
a:< it iippcara |i> III'- Army l'*tl> I'm 
irnun, run In- itltrrfril h.unid l<nlli 
litrtii'H mid hiinhvaii', HM |)ml li'iul 
Lilii' 1 run lie ri'iluci'd Ihn'nf.li prnjit-r 
IraiiiitiK iiiul tnipiiivi'.l dr'Vi'lnpioi'iil, 

Uir iiancl'ii mlc in ililn 
\villi On' Army may mil 
In- well liimwn, iln itilltti-uri' i:i lnliiiiH 
i-llVfl in niiiiii'iiiiiH w:iy;.; a Impir tr:il 
ci'iilfl' in till' ('mull /nut', iinprnvr 
nit-ill;, l.i tli, i Wliil.. Siimlii Mifi^ilr 
KiuiK' 1 , nn Ollln-r l'!viiluiitiin I'i'iili'i 
in Ahilmimi nil n'Miill f\'<n,\ ;,|.i'cilic 
n-nimiiH'iidiiliiuiii liy I lie Army's 
Ht'iiiiii 1 Mi'ii-itlilit 1 tidvijiitiii. 

Tin- ASAI 1 riiminitii'H many luli-utu. 
t'urrrnlly UK' :M iiifinm-r;! ami III 
rimMiilliirdH ii'i>n'!ii-iil Hi <icji-it| illi- 
di)iripliiif!i; llu'j' me itllllinled willi 
111 industries and \vilh VA! rn||fj;r8 und 
iiiiivi'iiiitlen, JiMlitfttry In'iuln, iliri'i'tniti 
tf ri-Heiiri'h, univi-rnit.v pi 'Miit-'iiisi iiml 
priifi'HMMrn ur<' im-ludi-il, 'I'litH hrnmi 
hunt 1 (if ni'ifiiiillc anil tiThiuilnitinil 
ifX|iiTL ! nr prnviili-H linth n n'rinniv nf 
iiixl 11 di'liu'lied miltn'ik 



which the Army ucedd In lirlji sulvc 
its lu^'h pruhli'in. 1 ;, 

The iiri'M'til. (Hiaii'inait ol* (lui punid 
i;i Dr. Iliu-uld M. AKU''\V, l.radi'i 1 itf 
1.1 1 e Wriipini:: hivi.-iiun, l.iifi AhutioM 
Scii 'ii I ilir L ii I in ru lory, ||i< waji n 
phyiiicisl with tin- Miinhallnii Trnjei-i 
frnni l!l'K! I'Mil uml Scirtiliiic Ad 
vi.'inr, Sup i e me Allird ('inmiiiind, 
l')timpi', priiir In n^iiiuaini 1 ; hi:i prrsriil 

\nni\\ inn III | ,ii;{ Alaillii!'., 

ASAl 1 ViiT riiairinaa i:i Mean 
l!lil]ili K. l''adlilll, lleiin nf tlir .Srliunl 
nf Kiiniaerriiif., N'uflh l'arnM)in Shitr 
Mniveniity at Itiili-ijrh. hi-un Kiiiliini 
U'MS appnitiled In the paiu'l hi I 'Hull 
ami a^iinm-d hin pri-iicnl. duiirs IMI 
laiimiry <>. IHilii. 

Siiicr IHiil u'lu'ii it Imd mily Ml 
memlii'r.'i, Uir panel Ini'i uiicEcrt^ini- 
iM'vnd n'"i'j;ani/nl imiit .'ii'i'Uin^ 1m 
achieve |-espiiti!,ivrinv(is tn lfcn p Arm>'';i 

needM, Tin- panel wn.'t nut i'litiilillsKi'd 
lu art Jin 11 liFidy "i niiij 1 .! ..... 'inmiltri 1 . 
In it inlly, MI lip: i IK'!:; \vn e rivaled fur 
(In- fnll.iwnic tnnel imial ureiin : 

Air Mnliility. 

CMU Wait'iii.', 



(iriMiml Mohllily, 

(''irepuwer. 

Ihmiuii l-'iM'tum. 

I t|it'nili<ni'i llivii'iireli. 

Maiiniieni''!!! nf H& t). 
l.ulr'i-, in flu' mti'ii'1,1 uf Ih'siliihly, ii'l 
Imc f;i(nijiti ii-phii'fd I he prnimiirut 
Mili|iiuiel iiy,'.|i-m, At tin' jtium' linn- 
llmt |>i'i niitn-'iH Matipiinrhi w<<re t \i-i < 
I'niilinui'.l, i( iv.'i'i drridt'd t luin^ 1h<- 
pi i nc I I'liiM-r tn hi in Hit r upet'ijd ad- 
vii.nry i'|.up;i \vhirli were .'n'lvinjr 
I lie inn j" i' i'i>mni'idity I'linniiLimhi nf 
tin- H.S, A.imy -Mulfjii'l t'"iniit!ind illul 




tin 1 Beirut ilic Advisory (inmp nf llui 
(limiliat. liovelopniimtii C'umiiuiinl. Thin 
\vnn aix'iiinplislii'd by hu'lndhi)', 1 nn tin; 
A SA I 1 an piTmiinetil. nienilierf) till! 
rhni rtiH-n of llii'sr advisory tfrnupH. 
Tlnui, si'ven cliainmtii tif upc^Eality 
iittviHory (deiiieiita wen; a<td(td Ln tint 
iiii'inhi'i^slii]) of tin' ASA I'. 

Sul^eds for ml hoe, Krmip Htiidy 
iii-t- norninlly ;mt;jjr:ili'iil liy Llic Army 
Materiel Cmntnund ( AMC), (lonilmt 
Itevidiiprneiilii Command (<M>C), or 
our ill 1 l.ln- dlvliiionii of OCItl), Tin' 
1'jinel I'lxci'iidve (lonimiUtMi (einn- 
pnr.ed nf the Afuiiidmil KtTivliiry of 
'the Army (It&D); l.lui Chief nf Rd- 
jii-nreh ami I (evi'lopmenl; 1'iuiel ( ihnir- 
iimii ami Vici- Chuinmm; CiimnmiHl- 
in^ ti't'iH-riil, AMC; (!niiinnimliiiK (it'ii- 
I'nil, CDC; and ASA I 1 elxceut-ivn 
.S.Ti'i'lnry) ;u'leel:i Hie elmirnmn for 
an npprnvcd ntnity wlm, in turn, pldoi 
< In- meinherii nf tiiji ju] hen- (ITU up, 
1 1 pun I'oitiph'limi of l.hc nhiiEy, (lie 
HUM] ivporl, in i'urwnnteil l.n (.lit- Chief 
ol 1 lte:ii'nreli nnd I li'Vi'lopnn-nl, and 
A,';.'ii;ilanl, Seerelary nf tlir Army 
(U^-hl fur iLi'liun, nn HpiH'upfiiih 1 , on 
On' lepiiL-r.-i .spei-ilie rei-iiinilirndulinriii. 

.'iiare liHiM, 11 iut heir ifi'impii have 
Completed wtirl; in (lie foUowliiK nrcan : 

Whit i' Siuicln ftlJNMlli* ItiiiiKi'. 

Clnunniiii : Dr. Clmrli'.'i C, hiinrit- 
;ien, rroftvKinr l-inn'rilnii, Cull- 
fi i rn in linitilul n nl' 'EVf'linnlii|ty. 

iMuhili' lOnei'K.v Depnl CniiconlN. 
Chiiirinnn : ]ir, Hiunhl C. Wrhrr, 
ri-nri'.-ifinr I'lun-riUm, Mnnnufhn 
."i'l I n I mil it nle nl' 'S'eelinnlnj^y, 
ami ( 'hief Srienl Hie Ailvi;mr, 
U.S. Army. 
In-IInuiH> l,ulnn uioriew, 

Clmh iimn ; Dr, llerlnr II, Mliiftei-, 
1 iivi'Hiifil dale I'rr.-iidrjii, Air 
tinrne Iu;d rnmt'iitu LnhciraUiry ) . 
Tilellt'iil Cum mini lent Minn. 

Cliuli'iiiaii ; Mr, ll.malil C. Kind;, 

( ( 'mtliiiitt'il intiiilf lntt:fj ciii'i'j',) 




Dr. Harold M, 

('litilnniin 
Army .Sck-iitlflo AclvliMiry 



Di'iin tlnlph 10, I'niluin 

Vic** (luiininin 
Army Scicnlilk Ailvimn-y 1'flitol 



Dofenso Industry Bulletin 




by 

Arthur W. Doherty 



With the announcement in the 
Cummercr fimtim'sa Daily of January 
4, 19R5, that the "Bureau of Naval 
Weapons is contemplating the pro- 
curement of guidance, control and 
airfranie groups for the Talos (RIM- 
8E) Surface-to-Air Guided Missile 
on a multi-year contract basis," the 
Navy's Surface Missile Systems Proj- 
ect Office initiated its first major pro- 
curement by two-step formal adver- 
tising. Ten months later, the contract 
was awarded at a price which was 
25,000,000 and 40 percent below 
the programmed estimates. 

The Talos guided missile, with a 
range over 05 miles, provides Naval 
forces with a long-range, surface-to- 
air guided missile, anti-air warfare 
capability. In conjunction with man- 
ned interceptor aircraft, it is used 
to break up and disrupt the coordi- 
nation of hostile aircraft attacks far 
from the fleet. Talos is 32 feet long 
and weighs 7,800 pounds at launch. 
Boosted by a solid fuel rocket, it is 
ram jet propelled with beam riding 
nndcoiirse and semi-active radar hom- 
ing guidance. 

In December 19(54, when the Fiscal 
Year I0G6 budget was being finalized, 
the Department of Defense revised the 
1'ive Year Force Structure and Fi- 
nancial Plan to provide for the pro- 
*m?f 1( L n r^ of an additional 470 Talos 
(K1A1-8&) missiles, and an Advance 
Procurement Planning (APP) Coun- 
cil was convened by the Surface Mis- 
sile Systems Project Olfice (SMSPO) 
to determine the course of action Ad- 
vance Procurement Planning Coun- 
cils implement Secretary of the Navy 
Instruction 4200.18A, which directs 
active support of Department of De- 
tense procurement objectives, includ- 
ing weapons acquisition at the low- 
est overall cost commensurate with 
qualitative, quantitative and delivery 
requirements, and the promotion of 
lull ami free competition among in- 
terested qualified suppliers. 

The RIM-8E version of the Talos 
guided missile had been procured in 
each of five previous fiscal years by 
Aim '' so . le - s ""'ce contracts, The 
hiiL Co . unc| l determined that, under 
bieakout and directed subcontract 
programs associated with these pre- 
vious contracts, approximately 80 
percent of the manufacturing docu- 
mentation had already been used for 
jompetitive procurement by the prime 
anti-actor or by the Navy; and, fur- 
hcr, that at least two different sup- 
mers had used the documentation 
nth satisfactory results. This docu- 
mentation, then, was obviously suita- 
Iti for competitive procurement; and 



it was believed that with adequate 
Government review, and revision 
where necessary, the balance of the 
documentation could be brought into 
condition for competition. 

With assurance from the SMSPO 
that resources would be made avail- 
able to perform a complete documen- 
tation review, the APP Council rec- 
ommended that the proposed contract 
be awarded, on a multi-year contract 
basis, by competition among qualified 
suppliers. It was administratively de- 
termined, later, that two-step formal 
advertising would be the method of 
competition to he employed. The re- 
sponsibility for conducting the com- 
petition was assigned to the U. S. 
Navy Purchasing Office (NPO), 
Washington, D. C., which had experi- 
ence in conducting this type of pro- 
curement. The task of validating the 
bid documentation was given to the 
U. S. Naval Ship Missile Systems 
Engineering Station (NSMSES), 
Port Hueneme, Calif., which main- 
the data repository for the 



To assist NPO in conducting the 
two-step formally advertised procure- 
ment, the SMSPO established a Talos 
competition team of personnel from 
the Talos Project Office; the engi- 
neering, production and quality as- 
surance areas of the Bureau of Naval 
Weapons; NSMSES; and others with 
responsibility for: 

Education of participants in two- 
step formal advertising. 




Arthur W. Doherty has served as 
Dep Dir., TALOS Project, n the 
Navy's Surface Missile Systems Proj- 
ect Ofhce since 1962. During World 
Af!L !i scrv ? a s a Naval aviator. 
Navv', R,, War ' M F r ; her ty joined the 
^ 1 f - Aeronautics, serving 
. En ^ meer * the Guided 



, . 

1951 198 T n UntU , 19I S L From 
iJJi-1862, he was employed, in turn 

Blrch " d Cor ' a "' 



Definition of the article to be pro- 
cured. 

Orientation of the potential 
bidders. 

Implementation of the competi- 
tion. 

Administration of the resultant 
contract. 

As indicated earlier, this was tlu> 
first major SMSPO procurement to 
be awarded by two-step formal ad- 
vertising. Many benefits worn derived 
from the experience gained from a 
smaller two-step procurement previ- 
ously conducted by the U. S. Navy 
Purchasing Office, Los Angeles, and 
NSMSES. Nevertheless, it was. neces- 
sary _ to acquaint both Government 
and industry personnel with the dif- 
ferences between this method and the 
more widely understood methods, such 
as advertised procurement and nego- 
tiated competition, and with tins ad- 
vantages of the two-step method. T (1 
the Government, one advnntagti is 
that bids can he solicited on the basin 
oi documentation which is suitable 
for use only by experienced producers 
while retaining the integrity of the 
Jormally advertised procurement 
process. Advantages to industry in- 
clude the unequivocal establishment 
in stop one of their qualification to 
bid; complete understanding of the 
task through preparation, evaluation 
and discussion of the technical pro- 
posal; competition with others of 
similar qualifications; and contract 
award based solely upon price in step 
two. 

A basic requirement of advertised 
procurement, includiiifi- two-step for- 
mal advertising, is that tho Govern- 
ment must precisely define wlrat is to 
be contracted for. In the case of tho 
lalos competition, it quickly became 
apparent that the concern of the APP 
Council with documentation review 
was well founded and this effort oc- 
P ie n\any people for many months, 
in addition to performing a detailed 
engineering review of 4,GOO manufac- 
turing drawings and 6,000 specifica- 
tion and process sheets, NSMSES 
responded to inquiries from potential 
bidders, revised ovor fiOO drawings 
and specifications and prepared Mats, 
ndices and cross references to aid the 
mlders The final bid package, which 
included much supplementary data 
on tooling and tost equipment, con- 
sisted of 88,760 microfilm aperture 
cans. Twelve such packages wove 
mailed to potential bidders, The po- 
bidders, of course, played a 
role in the documentation re- 



April 1966 



view liy ponding mil i-ri'ors, incmisis 
leitrirs and llir nred I'nr clarilical ion. 

Tin- Mrieiilnl inn <,f puienlial hid 
<t< i' i, :|',ain, henrlited linth (iovrfn 
larnl and industry. The Tains pro 
I'.r.un, with rnnls I'.niaj-. hack In l!l.]K, 
is imr nf I hr oldest j'.nidod missilr 
p mi '.nuns in 1 ln> muni ry, I ml il was 
relatively lilth- known! The Talos 
cimiprl il i,.n lr;mi, aeem dinpjy, puli 
lici/ed Ihr rnnipel it inn to smile rxtriil. 
l<| In in;', il In 1 he al Inilinii nf pnlrn 
litil hidden. Al 1 hi 1 sainr l.iinr il, wan 
re i 'iij. i n 7,1 -i I thai I he pi rpnra! imi n|' 
hids mi an item tu: complex an I he 
Tains mitciilr would he a cosily pin. 
cediiie I'nr imlusiiy and that thr 

Navy Imd a rr;>| niliililv hi prnvidr 

I ml IMI I ml hnldrr.'i with I he maximum 
HUM MI nt nl in for mat inn ininn which 
Iliry cmild hasr Ihrir hiiMMiviii deci 
sii>hs whrlher In incur Ihr rnn:.ii|ri a 

I'll' e\p'H:ie ,il p I r-p|| r | n( . iijd.'i. Tu 

'his .-nd, mil .iiilv was 1 he dala pad. 
a|',r made i\". mmptelr mnj us ai'eiir 
ali a: p.i , ,ihlr, Iml an eialmi .Hr hid 
dels' emilriviiC" wiiri held and thr pn 

I eh | in | hiildej ; s were riii'i'll rut'ed In 

visil I In- ( In iv i miirnl n wiiei| I neilil y 
ill which Ilie Tahe, mi:.:, lie was then 

'I'll'' hiddn'.' c.mlVirm-r Will, held 
Hi III' 1 I'. N, Naval \\'eupi'll:i Ml l loll, 
.'i rn I Heaeh, I 'a III , l'i up-rl p-'iMmiiri 

de.'.erihed lhr rnmph-lr Tain; 1 , Wrapnii 
.>y;.lriii ami lhr i rlaf imi M| I hr mis 
''lie Ii. Ihe Vinrm, le^ir\^.'ll tlir mif 
<ih' Mlli'.\ <.|< m:i and ci i! tr.i! cmnpoii 

tMil-i in detail, ami vriihncd an ap 
|n iil-.ul n|' Ihe |'i|! nu' of (In 1 prnjrct , 

'"'inlilrd nii''-.-ih"! and demumil i atrd 
hiri'iilr r heel, nil I ] n or nl ii i i':i. Tin- in 
,':p'-i'l i"n ni 1 thr I', ',',, N'n\al Wr-upiiM. 1 ' 
'"hiiiliial U. "..'!... I'hiiil, Mi; hiuvnka. 





Tin- linal ai'limi ID cnsili'i' nnnplt'lr 
.'il ry nni|ri':ilamlini', "I I In 1 coin 
l"'lili"ii ami pnipfi:;i*r| nnil.rai't. rr 
|ilil'r'iMi'iil:i was Mir ilHailnl n-virw 
\\illl riirli hiddrr nf llir t rflminil pi'd- 
|"vial lir I mil Milimilli'd n:i I'l'ijiiicrd 
in Hi'' lin;! sh'p ul' a I wu ulrp ]ini 
I'liri'iiirin 1 . All id' Mir Iri-liniral pro 
|in.'.ahi wrrr nindilii'd us a rrsnll of 

I Ili'i I >'\'|l'\v. 




* Allrndi'ri; al hidilrr:/ rnnrrrnicc : 

::i. 

Atlfinlft"! a! plan! Imn ; 1',!, 

* l-'iiud dalit |iui'kfi['.ri t mailril; I;!. 

* Ti'i'lllli''al pi M|II, .iil.j H-rriVri| : ,'i. 

* Mid , irrrivnl ; i., 

Tin' ailnlhm, ai'lnaHv, was m>l ijtiilr 
id r, ' '-a I a 'i imlirali'il iiini'i- I Wn lijil 
diinr II-HMI.'I \\rn- I'm inrd din in|r I hr 
I'uni-.'i.' ..t tin- rompi'titii'ii ami cicJil 

t'HlMliiUltrii wrr- rr|irr.M'ulril ill Illi' 

linn) iiiiliinir, 




Tin- consensus of (Jovrrnmeal and 
indusl.ry prrsminel is (| m 1. Ihe Tains 
competitive procurement was highly 
.successful ami indicative id' what, can 
he accomplished in ihis urea of pro 
I'lireinenl . The key lo Ihe suci-rss wii;i 
Ihr SMSI'O Tiilofi coiu)n>li1ion train, 
which was rstahlishnl In assist the 
Navy Purchasinj; OMicr in t-nndncl. 
ill) 1 , tin' cnmpelilimi. Thr h-ani wus 
exeepl ioaiilly well i|iialilinl I'nr Ihia 
piniierriii)', rll'nrl i ncliidiaj;, .s il did, 
pei jimun'l with experiencr in rn^ini 1 
i'riniv, production, quality aii.su raiici', 
dncuaieiitalinn, prncurrnii'iil mid emi 
Imel admiiii'il ration in hoth linverii" 
ineni and imlustry, n;i \ve]| us .'ipeciflc 
e\prrirncr in thr Tains pnij.'ct. Tin 1 
I en m was alsn st run c,ly mnl ivalrd In 
provr ihal Iwoslep formal udvi-rlis 
ill)'; could he used for lhr prnrurrincnl 
id as complex an ilein n:< lhr Tulnn 
I'.uided missilr in view ol' I lie wide 
sprrad skcplicism in hold (Invrrii 
"'""I iiiid indnsl ry. Thr fad Ihal lln- 
leam and hidd'T personnel, jointly, 

Wrjr ahh' In eslllllliah llir ha;ir for all 

ci|nilahh< I'oinprl il ion \y- di'iiums! ruled 
hy the clo.'irm-SS nf lhr Idds illld 111' 1 
I HI- I 1 ha! I hr | wn Inwrjil hids won 1 
within $MH) nl 1 mch ollirr, 

The Tulnn compel il ivr iinii'iirement 
;o:nin dem<msl rated I. hut- wiluilfinl ial 
pi'icr I ie ne Ills can nccnie I'rmn cum 
pefilimi and ralahliahed Hull, l.w'n :ilr]] 
toiinal adverl iiiinc; run he used In nh- 
lain <' impel it inn in (lie iH'ocin'emriit 

nl Cnlllplr.S itrillii. II also llij'jllliichl.rd 
srvrral i'ci|iiisile.'i for sncrensl'id com- 
peiil am ; 

* Precise detliiilioiisof nil ai;| Is nl 

an eiii'K ,'iliifn- nf the rnnipi'lil inn. 
This ttirlndrs no] nidy lhr d'iciiini'nia 
lion desri'ihiiiK' Hie arlich 1 In lie pro 
cured, hnl al:, i. Ihr rules of the nun 
pel il ion, I he trcliniral pi'n|in>ial re - 
<|uireniriihi and evaluation rriterln, 
and lhr lernin and mnidiUnini o|' Ihi- 
liiddini; and irsultanl conlrncl. Kail- 
lire In iiieH all parls nf thin rri|uiiv 
inrnl resulted in nnurrrsjuiry dt-hiyn 
dlirnip, ||)r Talon coiilji'-l ilion, 

Provision of nil i^periein-rd train 
in [lUpiini't of Ihi' Pnrcliuainic (Illln; 
with authority to K'VH il. liindiliK tind 

fin ri'iiuli't'd. 



* Prnvi.'ilon (if tin' iniixiiniDii unmtinl, 
nf Htit-ful daht In |it*'JlUlll ItlddeiM 
mi uii t'Mily and nmlinuiiiH \n\inn and 

I'OnprriUinij Mil the pail uf indllillt'V III 

iinaly/iiiir and n'itii'i.'.iiu: thr lula 
In Ihr iMid (hut th-'H 1 niiiy li' 1 n t'fiiii- 
(ili-tt 1 iimlt'i'iituiiilint; luiwrcn (hi 1 luiy- 
i'] 1 tliid Ihr |ii)M'nliu| iii'llri'd ill (he 
t'lnl itf !iti i |i inn 1 :iit In whut in hi-inif 
hid un In "h'p twn. 

U'lili Hie rxprrii-urc nf imci'i MSI in 



il, llir Suit'iicr Miit-iih- Sysli'in;i I'ri.j 
I'd OilU-'- limy lir I'Siii't'U'd In run 
limn', ;ind i-xpiind, ih> ul ili;:atinn n 
(hi.i mi'ihnd nf pinnuvmrnl. 



Defonio Industry Bullolln 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE >.< 



Dr. Donald M. MncArfliur 

sworn in Feb. 21 as Dep. Dir., Pefemu! 
Research & KiiKineerinu' (Chemistry 
and Materials). Dr. MacArlhur is the 
first to fill tile newly created portion 
and will lit- responsible for the lech- 
nicnl review and evaluation of DOI) 
re.Ko.arch and development in Hie fields 
of chemistry itnd mal.erials. 

Muj. (Jen. John T, Hinicyciill, USA, 
lias been mimed Commander of the 
DofnitHO Atomic Support Aneriry's 
Field Command, Sandia Haw, Alhu- 
quoraiH), N.M. He will succeed HAdm, 
Uulph C, JoliiiHint, USN. Tin- anni ( .- 
monl; became effective April :!l. 

lias [>e,en reassigned an Commander of 
the Defense Industrial Supply Center, 
I'lufnddpliia, a field aclivily'of DSA. 
'*'''; <'*'>!, Joint M. Keiidrnlinc, 
USA, ha.s been designated for awiinn- 
mont as Commnndor of the Di-IVmie 
PerMimnel Support Center, DSA, 
I hi adelphm, up,,), the retirement of 
Maj. (.en. Oliver C. Harvey, USA, in 
July l()(i(i, (| ( >n. Kellderdine in mw 
serviiitf as Commander, Defense In- 
dustrial Supply Center, 1'hihidelphia. 
Holniul I,. (InyoHo, Jr., has been ap- 
pointed Uxec.ulive Assistant m l( | Sen- 
ior IraiiHportidion Adviser lo Hie 
Commiindei', Military Tnilllc Matmin>- 
muni andT.'i'minal Service (MTMTS). 
Col. Kdward ]0. lhiHo.sc, Jr., USAF 
liafi been reasoned as Cliief, Dnln 
Systems Automation Olllce, Defense 
Construi'tion Supply Center, |)SA, Co. 
lunibus, Ohio. 

Col. William A. l-'lcldlnir. USAF, 1ms 
_ tl ''f'i'J i phief < ( f Hi,, |'i-,,diii'l M, m . 
' lonlrwl Ad- 




. ,,, 

. llnr .i n. K , UK. 'Hi i ', D,-!,,,, 

"l-i. "M. I'M i';-, !,..,! |;,,, limr . 
mm! . MI* ;II ..( (, v . }.-( .,, .;, , r 

I.'.'. ..,-), ,,,t I....,!-,,..,.,,,!); , lt ',| 

Hi li' '..u .l.iuu , 1 -.(..^ .,, i j,^, 

"i' 11 " -i ' t-i" ' : ', '-i- . );!.,, '.,( MI,.' 



Hrijr. <ii'. Knbi-rl It, Wittitini-. H. 
cci'dii llriff. (it'll. (H-OIIJI- I 1 . S.'iirir, .h,, 
UN IHr, nf Army A\ inl j.in, I if!!.-,- ,,i 
lln- Aii.'il. ('hid' nf ;-;inir I'ui- IMILT h. 



r; iiifni!}., 

' ' 'i t Ki- ' 

Col. Philip K, I'liiineul )iii>. 1.,.,., '.'" =>M.I ]>>..: ,,-,..., , n)i Mi|| 
mimed ComiiuuiiliT of Ihr I 'm ). , ,.; Mlll| i I liin ir,. i\ , ',< , , , , ., ' , [' 

lion (Hllce, Norlnll A KM, ( 'it Ml, ]{. i- 'i< i" >' ' m :ii .( I ... c.',, ,'i" Cni' 

jihires Col. Itolicrl \V. I..M.-, \\h., I,., , '"Im M H,niii M , h !>.'[, |*,. '(;,..,' 

lit in 1 Mi.'i.Miiiri Kivci 1 [in. Knumr, i -i.(S |', U |,,. , t!!1 | \. ,>,,-> M.,,S, ' ,,,ij 

Winfrrd ,M. Ci'i | r , j,., \ ''" " ! ''''I 1 i '> ' ; -( '.'^) , rt m'. .) 

I'hlef uf u ,i,, W |v rMnl.li'.lh-d ")"'-! '-i' t . I..I. K.-n.i. lit \\ >i, | m ||/ 

t:v n.-f ai ii-.. ""'; "\ iI 1 ; l[! " ; '. ' i!i -- ! ' i 1 - i: llllv 



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

ItAilai. Miitiv N. WiilHn, v,.li | f , 
nnil.' Dii'irliir .if F/ii'itHir . Kiii-in.-.'i 




DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 



Muj. (Jen, 
brim 



Dunnin . 
Com.nandiniv (i,. u - 



. ,. u - 

nil, Ih.rdU. S Army, Korl. Md'h,r- 

rlV'n 1 " {"' (! ' 1I1(I| ."K MJ. (it'll. WMHinn 
-'. Hnlloclc, who in rttlirinjc, 

HrlK . (Jon i JiiHnn .1. |.; W H1 KIK ....... da 

I -IT (J ( .,i. (Jcoi-fro J. I'iclu'll j r a 
f Stl(r "' K ' Army '(ilmil, i 



I) 



ii f . ItM. l.t.,... \ h, 

< ajil. William IJ. lluyei. | t -hi.v,-,| ! '' !l " ''"' ""^ !"... . i,. . M ^.. 

( upl, (in-cr A. Hiinln-r, ii', |ij,- r. u ii> '''"' ''"' > -.(-..! * f j'> 

ln'Jlll Div,, Hilrciui ,.r Vj,,.,!., mil i' j,,',,.,. H,,, J l;i ,,., , ,', ..,,., 

;!;;'!; y\j;V lii;il v' l '<i '"- '.,:; i.-.. .. H.. ,,,,; ;,;, 

(if. . ' V 1 '" 1 "" 1 fl "' 'l*tlV V.,tl. |h,. \l>.lIV-J. H\\;,, -. ),..., i 

Hlld llncli!! C.iMMrm.fl.m"'"" " r Vm ' 1;r "' : "" il t''' "'-I l''-- n -i,...- i: . 



DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 



" i " "" lit'llllltl (i, Cuir \vill \\i\u The fullmvii.i' \l i* 

^ffin^xssrw isr-^a'.'V '''"?-"*' ;;: 

nny .lent and Mvnlutiu,,,. /i,,.., .....'.. >' M..;... *.. '"'V ni| K- den. Julni I.. 

';l>',< iimiitiiniliT fu t .Mthtih- 



jKKlnH Dnp. Co.mnan.I , (, .j 
tlui Timt and Evaluallnn (i.mniulml! 
'jff. (Jon, Alvin R C OWIII , m,. f 






I., it.-ii, 



10 



VIl'tllTllH 'Ii' Til,. t * i -k i ' I' 1 f *ll I'f uri Tl il < j* - I'll. H|'| 

r n^tijii [t| f Ho J Jj I * iJ()llll IK* U I LI Ii j l(!| J I ] Liir jif V*l iV j" 

AsHt. Doi). Chief of stall' Pr!^'!'!!; i' 1 !'; "V," 1 ;'' 1 "'' 1 '' '''''''''> 

for iratoriol U(. it din,. H j'j M 'i'.'.n.^ tri ; (i|1 - "Kl 

inum^ii fVif ir,!? i ***** f '"iii^/iHfiiiiniitM*i A * . t . ^ 

JlfflVlJll ill* lIOtKtO* il' 'I* i Ml1 "*'' Ml * -/Vll ('Oil*!* |i I 



Tho now AsHt. Doi). 
jptwfl, for Matoriol 
riff. Gen. Jojicpli M 



11, 



April 19&6 




IX) I) Dii'i't-tii'i' r>lil<>,r>i), " l>! 
int'iilal I'ollnliini Cunt nil," .Inn, ',, 
liiiiii. I'rnvides a em in Una led ap 
pnmrh In, niui ell'c'clive use of Doll 
ri'itmiriTH ill, I In* I'fiiilnil nf environ- 
menial | mil ii I inn. Tin- ilii'i'H ive I'K- 
1,'ililinlies a I )(>! ) Kn\'iron menial t'o] 
I ii I ii iii ( )un I ni! ( InniMiill.ne I'ompri.S" 
in)-; eujvineeniifi 1 , medical mill oilier 
represenhiliveii nl 1 Ilic Mililiiry lle- 
|)iii'l nirnl ti ;tml I hi' llelVn:;<> Supply 
Af.'ency. 

DOD In.'t/nt^liiin ft..! in. 411, "Xi-t'.ni': 
ill/ ( 'liiiini/ii'illlnit <!niili'i; for IK>I> 
(tntn I rin-t in ii I'l'nji't'ln," .Inn !.!, Ill fill, 
Provide;! K'enenil (.iiiclelme.'i fur pre- 
piii'iiij', 1 Mi'cnrily clan.'iilii'ulion H'iiil<'s 
fur individual del'eime ^IMIM! nidi mi 
projeclu. II i;i mil ialenili'd an nil in- 
dex I'D]' merlin ninil el ji '<s i lira I inn uf 
iiifnrinal inn. 



1MID Diri-i'livi'ft aii'l iiislriir 
I inn;; may lie- obtained I'rmri : 
I'll lil ii p nl i OHM I) i.'itrilni licin 
ISraneh, <Hl|n> nl' I (u* Serrelary 

nf I lel'ellJle 

Knnm HIt;!(ll), 'I'lh' I'enliu.i'nii 

WwiliiiiivlnN, |i. <:. ;!it:toi 



Di-ft-niii- I ' I'm' ii I 1 1' nt f ii I Ch'i'itlo > \'ti, ,l!l, 
Minrli til, until. (I ) Small I'nrelmne 

I'd hires. ('.',) Kilinn 1 NtiUi'rii df AM 

HinmiH'Ml, and ImilnimealM nl' Asnii-.n 
meal, (it) Value 1'iiin'iiiecriiiK, MIT 
No. II, (-1) I're Award Survey;;. (;.) 
l''eilortll K\citie Taxed. 



Kach Di'lVtuir I'rnniremenl 
(-iivnlar I:: di'iiityiicd In plan- 
new ni 1 ehaiifveil policy nr pro 
ceiluri'H In ell'ecl, prior |.n pnlili- 
ealion nf tin Ariaeil Service 
I'rornremeal, lir^itlalion ( A S- 
I'K) revininii. ASI'lt niilincrili 
i'1-n will receive DIMI'n and 
ASI'R revi;iloii!i IlirmiKh I he Sii" 
perinleadi'iit of I )nnimenl;i, U.S. 
(iiivenntiitiil I'rinlinj; Olllce, 
\Va.'iliiii|vl.nn, !>,(!. '.iO-lli:!, 



iiu 1 ill, of I'^iiiifinit-iit iiinl 
fi fur i' mil in- in if LIII'HI 
nl I 1 ' mi in I'll tfuljil/in' in tin' 
Fh'lil. SoutliwciHt, IJetu'arcli IimiituLe, 
Sun Anlnnlo, for the Air Force, .Inn. 
lIHiti, !M pp. Ortli'r AD I1L!H (HM $1 



mi Oi'intnii- l>t'/n>lin'i,:i m. 

lit'Ht'urch C'(ii'|i.. for ihe 
Army, Jium I DIM, 1H(! pp. Order All- 
ITi-l Sllli gr. 

Klt'rhwlinninh'11 f Fni'i t'rll Kli>r 
n. Tyco Lnlun'ttUirieH, Wallliunt, 



Mass., fur Hut Navy, Nnv. l!M[fi, Hi; 
|i)). Order Al> (!MH ft? I ljl-1 

Jlijjli i'l'i', fci n re I'r >/<!)' ni mi cr a f 
Voltnii' Cell:;. Nnval Civil Kn^'inci'i'- 
iji)>; Lahncjilory, 1'oi'L 1 1 urnrilir, (Inlif., 
.'an. IDIKJ, 111 pp. Onli'r All (i^V !):M 

$1 

Stunt' Tin-nt-i'tit'tll .'I ::/)('('/:, of tin- 
lii'in'tn'i'im-iil nl f>in-ii tin' nt Si'i't'i'tiini/ 
l>ll Anntiriittit 1 !- TrtDi:;fttr>iint!tin. Wen- 
Inl. IIi'Mi-areli A ruilytdfi, [tniver, (loin., 
I'nr Hie Air l-'nriT, Nnv, \\Ktii, Ii'i |ip. 
Order AD (!:!K I !! 1 .';:) 

.'I / ' i' if it in a Mntlii'iinitirttt Tln'tii'fi 
ftir 'I'm in in ;i 1. i-ii i- ni it 11 i\'t'f.-;. Hell 
Aern;iy;;li'ins ( *n,, IlllJl'idn, N. 1 ! 1 ,, I'nr 
l.lli' Air l-'nre*', Oet. lil'ili, 100 pp, 
Order AD ll:!'/ !H)H $M 

tft'iilnh A N//H/// ht Xt'ii-iilifit* lit- 
tin i i' It Itaiiiu I hi- l'liitn Xjfaii-Hi. Ilai- 
vei'itily of [l)iniii;i I'm- i lie Army, her. 
llUlii, :ili pp. Order A h H:!.V l)Vl> $:! 

limn tin l''tii'ti';i t;' niiini't'1'inif I ><' - 
::i<iti St tin tin nt fm- ftfimtitt 1 S nut aim 
mid l\'i'ltilt'<! !',' i/ ni /mi fill. 1 1 n mi in Kii - 
H'iiU'r'riiijr l,alii)nilni'ir:;. AliiM'ileen 
I'mviiiK Omaiiil, Sept.. l!K>;'i, '.'..i-l pp. 
Order AD \\'.',:\ V\\ $lt 

t'.'ffrft:: 1 1/ Din)ilti}f t t >nii-l>fniiit> nf 
IhntHtit 'I rti n nf tf l''iiin'fiii:i l>uriu;i n 
I hull -A, i' i:: ^ 'liiiiin-iriiittn'if Ti'tii'tiintf 
Tn .)/>. Nn! I Ii A me He a m A vinl inn, I 'n - 
Ininliiiii, Oliin, I'nr Hi,' Aii 1 t''ore<\ Nnv, 

niii.'. :i:Jii pp. onlrr AD ii 1 ,!'/ r-'H $t\ 

'I'll i- 1- 1, i nl Stuitititji nf Hnil?iit'iti'lt>tn 
Put-In. I'hillipM I'.'lndriini <',, ||,,r|. 
lesville OiJji.. I'nr the Air l-'urce, 

Am-;. I'.niii, I:M pp. dnin- AH i::'.[ tt;n 

.-?! 

l''lll lin I" Jt'i : ::t'll.t nf ,\l'inl:ltit' tfitttitt- 

linn f rti 111 n t'' iii / If t 'nliiufi'i; E'arlii- 
Mfitllrii-Illinil l,Jllini-;j|.irirs, ('ill'liiile, 
Mniiii,, I'nr (he Navy, .Ian, Miiiii, i7 pp. 
Onlef \D liliH HV $11 

Ctili'illiltitin nf lln- Mninnilnlit'illljl 
h'fflt'rtt'ii \'fhn'itit full ii fin I in fft<' 
i'nr l'"n l\l nf ( '< I'tnin I 1 ' in Hi- h'i'iiif 
jlnilii 'i. N;iViit IJc:ieare3i I iiilmral^ry, 
WiiMhiin-lnn. M.r, Mer. l!Mi,. h ill* pji. 
Order Ah ii:>ti HIM if,;', 

/, i KI/I itii-l'ltlti i- \\'t-ilffi-ti In I't'itltt'i- 
tin' lli-tii/ irf Tfiii'],' H"('n)/;; nl Xitjirr" 
.'tttnir X/n;<i!i\ ntiil In 1 ui'i'i'n:x' I, iff itl 
Lnii' ,S'/" '''''''' Nfivy'ji David Tuylnr 
Alndel Hitiiin, \ViiMliinjrtim, D.C., Anjr. 
IJHili, lit! pp. (tnl'T All C:!fl (>;..' $'*. 

k'.rtH'ftiiirnltil !' I'lit/nitiitii nf Jfi'iiil 



Hii'nhi, Kiii.'ii'r Aern;iimre \- Kli'rl mn- 
ii'rt, 1'nlii All. i, (,'ulif.. fur llic Air 
:iy ji|i. Onler All' 
Si 

< 'Inn Hi-It- t'inticii nf 



,.. 

tMTi'. Nnv, lllli.'i, :iy ji|i. Onler All' 
illli (I;.? Si 



ItuMin, WnnliiiiKiiJii, O.C., Dec. MMiH, 
itl pf.. Order All W! I'lif) ?:! 

Ji'rtirtitniH nf l' f r'i'i' liUtfir'ttht ('n)t- 
i u in in tf Nili'iijffH, 1'lihvanl Dnvieu 
Cht'inieiil l.iihnj'aliiry, Alu-i'yslwyUi, 
\V:ili'.H, 1W thi! Air T'orer, Oel, llttili, 
I 1 |iji. Order AD li:!V 8H) $1 

iifinfiiiii Tfii'oi'm Ai>i>iifitiHut In lln- 
i)t'uit/n nf tVi'in li/nil/nii fijfitli'imt. Nn- 
vn I A mnnmil inn I ><-p(i| , ( 'nun*, I nil., 
Nov. I !)(!!>, :>:> pp. Order AH t\'.\'l 'Mi'l 

$1 

I'tttuitiu ,?rl (')n i tni:-t>'ii, J f\'iiijiti- (Ini- 
veridly for tin- Air Kmve, I lee, 1!HM, 
MY |ip. Order Ah (JliU J.IM $;! 

I'lii't't'ntfi A ii inni I ( 'fn'ttiiuh'H fi'n- 
!t ni in ('frit-it'. Air l-'orci' (illicit nf 

.Scienlilli' It) Jireli, Nov. IlKifi, lifiV 

pp. Order AH fi:>7 (i(!ii $i\ 

;Mti::it S/ii'i-i rnnn-i I'll- Sf II ll it'll of AY . 
ii, 'I i< ni -i in !' fni ii i':: t,,liniutilii I /'er 
Smitn/inir i'! /'Y'r h'tnticnfu frmir t)jn'- 
A I until] >ln- rr f-'ln nii':i. i\lid wesl I'd 1 
Hi'jureli Iiuil il.uh', KIUIHUJI Oily, Mn. 
fnr l.he Ailvain-t'd Ive.si'drrli I'mji'i'lii 
Ar,'eiu-y. .Inly IlllHi, 'M pp. On|,>r AH 
Kid KOI $:> 

Ttirninniffiuiiitit- innl ( ' in inniifinn 
I tit I u I or ( 'nn-'. In lit \' ttf ii in i' ( 'intihii:l~ 
Ihui ni Sdiirhiiiim f n't: Mit'titi't-n nf 
[Ifii/i'nin'u Ci.i-niti'ii nfliit,'it it'Jtli Iff- 
Hit in in- fi tnl rn< i > n, 1 In ivi 'rally nt' Tn- 
rnnlii I'tir I lie Air l p 'nree, A) if- 1 ". I Hl'fi, 

'.:n:i pp. ord.-r AM ii:!n !i-i;: $ii 

Trttfiiiiliuii Mi'titf ( 'mii/i/i 1 ,''* n ,-t f't>-> 
Ii n tint -\i-init-ii)n(in'fin':i, I "lark Uni- 
verailv, \Vnri'i"iler, lMu:i!i,, I'nr Mm 
Nnvv. Oee. |!li;|.. I I -1 pp. Order AD 
ill!'/ VOii ! 



Knrec t 'anihtiili', 1 !' ItefH-nivli 1 dinnru 
lury. OH. l!;ji, III pp. Onler AM 

o 1 '.!',- met ?. 

hit I'tr t'l'if il/K.'ii'i 1 hlt<'i-ffl : till'i-t i^i fin- 
Time innl SjitK-r tii-mtlnt hni t'l A'/iT- 
h'tm Ih iiiiitjt hi ilitiir-TrrnjH'ftilui-i- 
l'liirntut:i. UlilViM-jilly nf TeXlln fnr I lie 
Air I'liree, .Inly lii^.'i. I :i'.! |ip, OrHer 



f'l-niii ,}fntlfl Tt'ittit (h'l-r li'i-finlur 
Wtii<i'.-i. Niivy'ti Dtiviil Taylor Mntli-I 



l ri'-'it-ai-eli itnil de- 
vi'luptiH'iil rupiu'l'i nre Hvnilnnlo 
j< fieii'jio' uiiil inihistry "I, jH'ini 
iiiilienf.iMl fnun: 

tMf-nniiir)ni.itH(i I'm- 1'Vcleral uinl 



S|ir!nKfliOil, Vn. ttilM 

Antlmri/ciil DOM roiilniH,nrn 
niitl Remit''!':! may njituin Iht'jto 
ilni'HMiE'ii1:i williuitl, rlinort' frnni : 

(%'Mtt'r 



. Vu. UaU 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



11 



l' m . niMlnil riiiltu 1 , lin- nmln.l npiip 
in. Mil, w.'iip'iii'i <liivi'ti.ii i-iniipiiu'iil , 
r.wilHil.'iJir'l'.. humi'li.'iT. :mil i-xpniiln 
1,'. 

a ;',||l|i hl'UMilr I : n i'.\\", 1 1 U >|'. 1'iUll 1 11 1', 

nn.l ,'..n!n.l .'I '.ytih-m |n r..fiii:iiir.'. 
hvlmiritl rluirin-li'i 'i.-iliiv. tili'l i-..nli)', 

ill nl inn, 

Ail I'HUirli.'i! lltnln \vnl.M- \Vi'l.]i 
,,,,.,; i>.i |>.'.l<i<". Mini mill. 1 - inuli'r >>':- 
I,. in null i nl <il A I >* '. 

ft 1'Apln .i V.' [illlrlV . 

B |''.l l| I, MUllll ill III'.. lll-IIU 'III lull, 111 

i'ijU!plll>'1ll . 'iltip p\ I tili'i'MMH' 1 .. 



lilmvr . 

ft It,- .I'HIi'l. ulnl .--.pli.nil'My ilrVi-lnp 
,,!. I '' ".pl..'.tv t -.. 

| t , ii.lijllli.il 1" IHI|'I'".I>1J' ""' " Vl<1 ' 

,iM ,- ...... tii.MiMi. -.1 Hi.- NY;vy\ '.up 

,,,! iirli'. If M- > in III.' lll.'l.:> "1 Mi;t 

i, .,ui!, MM 'lu-iii.- niirl pi-1-...Mii.-l 1'V <. 
: ,i r i.tltr .li'MiMMllli' 1 " CHI Hi.-..' I.. 
,.,! im.ih'.h-, t.. Hi. <'|.i. I "I Nnvitl 
.1, ..... tin- . 'I i" '"I'"'' 'I lil;it ' >" 
i,t".v t.|- f -.uiu;iilt..ii '.'-'ill I"' ..... tiphi-h Ml 1 ' 
|..M"nin |'lii|" ; 

e ,\Hu MI MIL I .ti.-m-i i" " flu- '-\ ; > 
1. nr> niiiimt: 1 nn-nl !ip|" !1 ' ''' '" ''' i( I 1 



,.iu ..... 

.,,,,,,,,!(, ,,( 111.- !>iMi-h"li:il '.li'iun--!.' 

,,,.,. "1.11.1.-. i)..- fi,,.-r ..i Nij ."! Mi; 

l.i Ml; m-t.i. v.. Minn- |.lmi.-.--i <"' '> 
,l,,..|,l -.1.=...-. "f -nU.O iin.l (<; ni-i.- 

-" 




'I'lunniiii 
iwtl. Si'ci'rlnry ul' 



. 

i-ft'nm' (Miini"wi'r) 



iiui r. . 

Inin hjlli'-n ilnUnrti ii y:u' in tluii 
mvji. Alllimu:!, Hir Mililiiry I't'imrl 
mnii.'i liiiv.- lii-i-n l.-;nl.-ni in tin- in;.' 
nl MIII. .ID. tiriv ihiilnit'lioiml ini'tlHMlii, 
[]. ih-paitnu'iil nl' |li-fcit!if nuifit r.Hi 
r.lnnlty r.niliiiii'' ,'u-i-l.inK wny!'. l" i"<i- 
|n..vi-'llt' i|imliiy ' ' 

it . ,-,|ur;iliu .iii.l 

\\Y Imvi- l.-iHin'tl ihrntiKh "i"' ''Mi';''; 
,.,,- , in (In- v.TiipMii ,'iyiili-ni urmiiiii 
l,.,n |n.ii-i-:><i tlitil iii'liinliy run ply 
' 





I 



UTiM-H :. - 

* 1,,. i.-.i-.- 'I'"' ''ithi. i,. v .iii'l ''' 
...tiv .. IK.' \-uO unit, j M.I ..nriiiH^i 

IIMII 1.V f- |,lMllll)l.: n,.(,..>('Hll1n-" "< 

' '-i- 



Navy Reorganisation 
Briefings Sot 

, f il.t V- 1 viil 



ti- .. 

it. iM'tn .dv l( -i'""'- k ' !il ''V"- '"', , V 
L.iHin^, ,., ),.. hrl*l it. I. -MI? ""'''- 

I'ulti illLll Wll>')ttt^fl"t>, 1* ' 

Vi.- A.llM. I .1- Hj'l^i'.. f | (i , f .i' f 
- - - ...t.1 n M 



, 
'I 1 ,, Ii.rililiil'- tliiJi i'iiili-HV.ir IHin, 

,-, (lit 111'- p;tltU'l|'it" " l ''"' ()l1 !'''' 

,,( 1. .lu. 'uli. n i an. I iii ullilialu'ii \villi 
Of- NMlh.ii.tl 1-VrniitV litilir.tviiil A- 
,.,,.1,'itiMM, n I'liiiiiiinj: n lu-i'-tiiMT 
(V, ,.,. ,, .l.ni, 14-11. in MM- \Vii:ili- 
ii.t>i"M. !.<'., i"'''- A nuip-r .l'-f 

IP,,. ..( Tin- v.oMYirn.v V.'lil I" 1 I" 
nMuMiv ,iinT f Hi' 1 in ; u; 
aii'l 1,111.1=. i-l Itnlt IrninuiH unil '-'In 
r.iinoi |.t.r><tin-> iui.t flu- pmnviltin-n 
l.c v,lii.-ti |...lirit". in 'I""'" I 11 ' 1 ' 11 ' 1 ul '!' 
(iMtinil.!!-.! I*' >"' -iV^-'i'i" lU'l'i-""' 1 '' 



M>14M-l>1 Ul 

,! t-lhtl< 



Ihiiii.V- 111)'. .-.llf'H'"'^-. li']'n-:i-lt( 

,.-, ri-i.i - Mihlurv |ii-|'itHiit|'iil'i. 
- oiln-.- M! Hi.- ;<Ym-tuiv "f Mi-friii." 
.) fin< Milu-.-.r Ivlm-.iriit will In-i.-t 

l ..... -i!..' snr:>'< of pntnifV '"|MVIM 
iii(inir ><"!'< W'"*'' 1 
-'!'"''', nil'H" 

ft'"" Ul " 



mill iuvr.it utlii-r limn wrii|ii.ii!i pni- 
riin-iiii-iil., Tin' Stud- "I" 1'iilifnriiiu 
1m:; ftunul llnil 111"* .'"mi'-, i'niiipniLj'*M 

\\-liirli pill, in' 1 " ""I" <ll ' llil ' rlin lllri V 
,)<.(. TiuitK- rll'i-rliv.' tiii'iiiiii I" pn-vi-nt 
,'i'iiin-, alnili* p'lllutimi iiml ili'iitu'" 
siliili'wiili- Ininnpiii'liitinn nynli-niii. 

'I'll, t-xpi'l-il'tll'l' 111' Ull' .l"t> C'll'l'!! 

liiiii li..wn Unit iiyiilmm h-anisi nf .1.'- 

CciiM-.ui-il-llll'.l CiillllUllli'-M .'IUI tUlllj 

tipj.ly Ili.-iv siUillii tn iiuuiuriiiK n"l 
nptTiiiiiiK I'll'.'.'iivi- irniiiiur. ci'iili'i'ii. 
Alllii'iiirli iii'liiiilry Inui nl \viiyn pi'ii- 
viil.-.l Hi- 1 iiminrily "I" K<"| '""''I ll1 
niir nnpiiurl !!, lln- IHH^ I" "' 
i.iii-nimif.iiu: iitilniilry t" imivlili' Hinrc 
I'llli'iriil iiuniviil.iiiiiii lii siupjHU'li nrrUM, 
K.II- .AiiMipIr, I'niir utmlim wi-ri' l'i' 

ri-nily ' ipl'-t' 1 '' dy iiutwiU'y '' u1 ' lllt ' 

-' , m UK' fi'iiiiillll.y nf u """ 



,,y:ii'UJ i-i- 

i-!i ...... pin I" Ul" in-'ivliiinu "!' lli-ltlltl 

riu.' I"M' ntililiiry jH-n ...... i<-l IV HKI-I! 

nii-.lli-nl fm-ility whlrli will in,-nrp ( ,i'- 
at.- Mi'- hil'-'l ('''Ininl'iKlfiil H'l' 
in iiii-ilifiil Jirtt-lH'.' ;iinl fliKilK 
M.I-.I iif UK' ninipuiiii'ii w)i" V 
,- ..... rari-, nir illn-ii.ly In Ui'- 



. 
ni.'.'l Ui.- l--iiiruiil(i "I' IMi'im>' 

,-| U'lin:,.- ...Pllpl.! ( iliiMI ill I'Mllll 
iillti'tlltf, 1 I! 1 i-Ml'i.lil'UI'.illl'.'. Wt' ft't'l Ullll 

Ui>- '- mil.' up|M"n'li upplit'ti I" impn.v 
MM- ll..- .|mlly "I' l'Hli ii-i'vii'.-ii r.ir 
tlio inilltiiry i-Hit l" 1(t ' "IpH'il t" <i"'' 
t-,luriili'in mtil iraiiiinn; iin-uii. 

Tli.- purpH'if *>f Un 1 'l 



( " 

Hili-NuK'* win 1- 1*M 
AttvH '.'' Nitty : N 
],,,|,,,itti.l A-H. H. 



J-t-ntUy (('..'"f.'-^thslilv "1 



iiuhiiihy iut'1 Ui' 1 I'"' 1 l ' tir '>' '" , ll|l< 

pliinlliiiK {'li*Rf; nl' il rnnr'-rl'-il t'H'nrl 
In impnivr Un 1 i|ni'lily "1 "i' 1 ' "1 inil 
|m-Ki'-.l j.ii|.|"'i't tin-mi. Tin' itn;ntn "I 
Hi,, huh iniliir.h-y piHlii'-i'il'h 1 P' 

niMiirl >"' wfiipini nyiiti-ni iiniui- 

-iii'tn piHr'n:i iti Hi-ir I'vi'li'iil ; u ninular 
uppiniit'li t.. liif I'lliiriitlnn iiinl h-uiii 
itr Mippt'H i"*' 1 ' 1 nlVt'in I'sl.i'i!)!" 1 '""" 
i '-;, 



l-'nr 



ncl 



n- 
N\V tm I'Mi^ 



('!, \Vm--hif in*""- 



,,-n,- l.ux l--n 
( t- |'rl "f Iw 



''. 



und 



nil 



Mr. i'liul A. 

Kutlniiiil Hi-i'iirily IndUHlrlul Anh- 

riiili'Hi 
SniU' HIM! 

10:111 ir.th si. NW 



, ., 
: (Ar.'H CfflJn iiOl!) an-!il!nfl 



Dt(n4it Industry Bulletin 



li'flinnluj'V. I-'ur 
, . ' 

llHt.-K.V "I MliUI. 



:'.'' !i " il(iv '''"' -I r .....a n,,, 1 ,:!;!!;;;;;^" 1 : 11 ...':: 1 '''; 1111 '" 1 '. 1 . <">" m.i y m-m >,^" ( \ mv ' ! m : u ^ in tlin ;i ^y, 



. iiir 



irir l|ll|i " 1 *V ''VM.-,,,.. JU1 ,I |,,| , , nt . , 1Nlt j"'!' '! Wl ' '' aiMlr '"v ^ Uml w.- nmsl " ' ,! !/ Vl l "- vI vl)iliLy and rr.a<:Limi 
nt' Mir M I" '( "fnvi- for overall "mirri t " l l tll " l Hty "I our aii.4.si!<w, I have HU| ( . 

Wi.h ,lvmJ' ^Vn* 1 .. 1 "..".' 11 :' 11 ." 1111 !^ 1 '' 1 '.ir, LlHM.,,,|'nr S* V'"* fllh '7 ^nmM.ioNH of mi,-' 

"' "'irlil. M " s "'" ll <> * fur nHvaiiH!,! OVIM- t]u> 

im-si'al nut- as Urn Kcm-raLi.ni is im >r 
Vl! "iji- first l 



" l " lu " in "' iiiinii, ,l :,f i.u.-rtr ,,,. ,' '"'."'''livi-M. This iliviitiun Ls lu ' itll() "woMiil, and IhaL i.s Uii 

Wl ' il ' 'V' 1 ""' Aiil,,- ,. - (,., n,,. i,,,!,' 1 ," !' ' 1 '''"'>' ani1 imnainly an ;irlllli| y tluit IL 1 

Ir.H iin;!,.,,., W( . ' "' ""; ili'v;iv.- nf Mi'Kihilily H'l" 11 "^" may Inul (< a 

M.-M,.,v,. w.'. 1 , 1 ,,' ^T,' 1 '!^' 11 '.' '" |l( " n< '' '"' virlmil| .v inipriK-d-aliii- lo'rvnn'Thl 

U. ..( I),.. H M | lilv "Ninr|,., | rt iM..,li!i|.|i!i ;t lu-i.-lly Kunu- (ll( ' li|l ' vil ' I" drvcJnp H |,t-li a .syslnu nu! 

"""nr S.,1.,,, ,.,"." 1 " '""I l"-".i"'h-,| mira.rh ami uV ; lh- "<''K^ lilun> wonhl l. | n-iufllH-n^d 



""rahly. 11,,!, if UN- Hnvi.-ls 
l '' tlllj Hl " 1 l" I i" IIH with sur . 



| ( .\,,j, i , .( , Miuni i-;u ln'i' | hi' iii'ii' IN- ! r - "irj'.HT nn.'i.'iiM-.s. 

, .' , ' '' " ' :1 '' "'" m "'ill mi i ill. I In- I'l-i.'.j.Jrr I ... - ,.'' 'i'i.: . . . 

In iid.l.liMi, i,, -:li.,.,rU. iin.r ih,- \,, j.irrl.'.,, ... ( '-M p :ni.'i'.ri id lite U"'' 1 iuwsihihly, hnwcvcr rcinnlc il 

F '' * p '')'-Ml [,>,.,, ,.,. i, ,,,-,._ , hl . liU..,-'';',!!''',,,',' 1 '!' 11 "' .' l '"' ;i1 ''""'I 11 ' 1 I'" I" iimyi-)-inhidny t m nnr ccMii| H! |[inf; arm 



"' '' """"-! ..n.i.h..,, i,, 1 1,', ., ^..n,,,, .' '""' mH ' l|1!1|i ; 11 ' 'i'-rily ! IJ ' |V " f ""*M n ml hn.nh,-,-.,, Ina.ldi- 



HI 'iJ'iUh^lJiiU'i'h.nii^.-...... . -> . ' limi if 



y pin- 

niixnl Cum', UK; 
ly "lay have to nerve 

,. . : " Kivr ' '"'''Uinnaldr.fni-nnrn.iHKilm Hnl 

1 i'-'''l..iiM.r 1 irlii.n indrid- ( .' ur I"' 1 '''''"! I'orc'c nf jil.rali^i,: linnihp]'^ 

ijtnt. v .,.., , ..i. .1 . mi( ^ w | ( jj (i 



>. Lilinit iMii-li-nr war, 



UV W|U '"' ....... l' 



In 



i".|Mn,,,[ ' ' '' "'' "'''''' ' |<!lt|l! ''' l-.'iiii,.-..-. in nnr n,\..Mi,i t y. XVf . dn* | 1(1 v,. I'" 1 niniv HfipItiftlH-Mh-d uivin.nriH'iil. n" 

;:;-' i;-;-' 1 ^.!. 1 .';.':;',;: 11 ;',,;-;.,::;.: 1 "i"'-l;:i;z2 : S 1 .-^;;;t: i ';;~ i :''. ni ' n , i : i ':""':''' i 

***'*'t^ntJi'i*'!oijM^i-'- 1 * K, ' l ''il | *VJL|i|'L >> ^MiF]ii'i .>},.. . *i* ki ., * f""*''ilrlHl 

' ' 1 ' ' i ' + -i---*-uii-^||i |l;l'|| niMllJ|Bf|[||'ll*jlVj' niMlN'MJll-IMtkll-'it 'il 

" r ' i| 'I'''"-'"'" ^.^VXfli""?, r'"'' - 1M l-'l-i.-'iT'iMM''...' 1 ''''!^ 1 .' 11 ''' 1 ' ;iM y '"'''""" '"'^'^'^'''^"iidhirlimllK.inl.i.r. (': IU -- 

HMI,.-,!,,,,.. f , H,,,..). \ " ""' '"' TJlv J .. ' '''" "'> "my niatt.-. m ' 1 I'liiiuicall ri'ifi,i,n.ai(l KII-IM'HtN 

"*' M, ,...i,, !t , !K ,,,',. ,.'!', .."r.'.r,, I. :'/,'' H '!u-!Tma '^ ^"'"'V 1 " 1 "' 1 " 11111 - lli ; )l J"; nili ""l >>y 1!7I whldi wif[,r ivr , 

^'M'r!,;;:;;!, 1 ;;,!; 1 ;';;;:;;;; 11 ^; "^"Kl^^'tr.^t'H.i^l'nV;^ lil'l-Mhlu 1 ^: 1 ';;; 1 ^,^'^ 

''''"'''^-^".-.Vi^^.r/V.iriu -m.'^^.l^iil'n!^ |l'"-l.'yrl..jm,r,,M,F wl'iulV/hnum!"!!!, 1 

,;'"'" '- 11 '- 111 ' " ! .mi...-!,!!,).!, t-.T iMi-'ii..-.! at,) !,,Jiriair'ni ; 'di-!!,J - A ' lvi " iml ">' Ktr,U,- K i. Air- 

'"' '""':-, M..- ..m m^;.,,, ,*, ,.,.), N "' '" ( " ;i ' ri11 " 1 ' '""- 1 "- >"y iiH-Ind,- 1 ', il ^'' 1 ' 1111 1( '' i l ' >c ' l ''' lliM ^ " v "" Umwn <d' lh- 

'""f''J-rr.>'..f l i-..,H,iM-- H. it t fi.n ,v,. } ^ in '^>' "^' I.Tln.nt,. and mivliaiiiral AM.SA vvnul.l incnr|.niatr 

' '..iiiuitihl-.! (l.ivn! i-. :n -.-,,M'H,. J 1 ' 11 "' 1 "" 1 "' iii'l.". HIM! dfi-iiys \vliicli ^ Vl>l '>' ^ulnn- I'diind drHiraliEtt in ] (1 ,, K . 

'-n, ! , ,'.,.. \V ( M-P* .1!-'.,'.. .r-ri'l"- " !ll> Vr)y 1 '" Irl l' ljl ' ) * 1 *' 11 fll)l "I"" ex- '' l ^' 1 Niiylnml mjmrjty. TlHtt jiaylnmi 

(V f< "'"" lin.-..!'. lit,,- ' h , (| -. ,,^'/,' '!'.!' Iu ' ltlvI -V '"''">'. ';"'lM n. iiHJ.H n!' mtrh-ur u-.-apmi.!, mw- 

A) )J;- ::iiuii' tiiiif, wi- inuMt ''tnlravnr Hljtvt t ''"nvi'iilimial Jiiunli.'t, nr any nlhiM 1 

hi inn- E - Vl "' "'" '"""iiiliniuf. 



id rnimc'Hy ,,f the 

< " ijiii(i ""' ''i' 1 m.,.H u f ,.'fui ri^r^j'^^ri!!;,;"^' 1 '!; 

Industry Bulletin 



number of B-52's, converted to carrying 
cvut volitional munition?, are being ein- 
\>]\ul for area-bombing of widespread 
ciK'my installations and troop concen- 
t rations iii South Viiitnam and for de- 
priving tlio enemy of any sanctuary 
throughout the vast expanse of the 
jungle. The B-f>2's have been .so suc- 
cessful in thi.-i role that they are now 
being modified to carry, in a single air- 
craft, over 100 odd-pound bombs or 
equivalent combinations. 

But just as we do not plan to elimi- 
nate the bomber from our strategic 
forces, \ve must anticipate that a Soviet 
bomber threat will continue to face us 
for some time to come, in addition to 
their missile threat. This means that 
we must continue to maintain our 
bomber wavning system and manned in- 
terceptors wliich can cope with the 
threat 

We are flight-testing the prototype of 
a new interceptor now, the YF-12A. 
Equipped with an advanced fire control 
system and highly maneuver-able air-to- 
air missile, it can engage targets flying 
at low or very high altitudes, Its high 
cruise speed and very long range would 
permit its rapid deployment to any 
threatened area in the world. 

These few examples show that the 
nuclear-strategic threat entails a great 
diversity of tasks for Air Force re- 
search and development, with objectives 
ranging all the way from near-term to 
the indefinite future. The emphasis is 
more on near-term objectives in the 
next area I want to discuss, the limited- 
war threat. 

Here, too, the trend of the threat is 
clearly established for years to come. 
But the ensuing research and develop- 
ment objectives are more immediate and 
better defined, both because of the 
acutemas of the threat and because 
of our actual experiences in local con- 
flicts, especially in Vietnam. One of 
the most important lessons we have 
learned in the Vietnamese war is the 
demonstration that airpower has as- 
sumed a primary and expanding role 
in limited wars and anti-guerrilla 
warfare. 

To understand the future significance 
of this lesson we must remember that 
the communists, deterred from waging 
general nuclear war, have been trying 
to achieve their global objectives by 
fomenting and supporting local con- 
flicts, ranging from internal insur- 
rection to open aggression. Our com- 
mitments as well as our own national 
interests have compcllled us to par- 



16 



ticipate in a considerable number oi : 
such conflicts during- the past two 
decades. 

There can be little doubt that the 
communists will continue to encourage 
and support local conflicts in widely 
separated parts of the world. We must, 
therefore, endeavor to deter aimed ag- 
gression and limited wars by resorting 
to the same principle which has been 
successful in deterring nuclear aggros- 
sion and general war, that is, a credible 
capability to make aggression at any 
level too costly to the responsible par- 
ties. The Air Force must contribute 
a major share to that overall capa- 
bility, and increasingly so at the lower 
levels of conflict. 

It is true that airpower has been used 
effectively in all the local conflicts in 
which we have been involved since the 
end of World War II. But the primary 
role of airpower in fighting limited wars 
has never before been demonstrated as 
dramatically as is now the case in Viet- 
nam. The great effectiveness of our air 
operations in that war was impressed on 
me during my trip to Southeast Asia 
last October when I had the opportunity 
to visit a number of bases and talk to 
hundreds of men of all ranks. But it 
was readily apparent that this effective- 
ness was due primarily to the extraordi- 
nary ingenuity and resourcefulness of 
our men in making optimum use of the 
airplanes and equipment available to 
them. 

It must be understood that we have 
to use aircraft which are in our present 
operational inventory and which are not 
necessarily designed for the kind of 
counter! nsurgency warfare we are con- 
ducting in Vietnam. I do not mean to 
imply that most or much of the equip- 
ment available to us in Vietnam is ob- 
solete or unsuitable. Nor do I propose 
that we should tailor a major portion 
of our aircraft inventory to fit the spe- 
cific conditions and environment with 
which we have to cope in Vietnam today. 
We certainly cannot afford to become 
overequipped with such specialized air- 
craft, and we may not always enjoy 
the "permissive environment" In which 
we are now operating, that is, virtually 
unchallenged rule of the skies, 

But I do feel that the lessons we have 
learned in Vietnam point up the need 
for providing the Air Force's general 
purpose forces with more advanced and 
suitable aircraft for their expanding 
role m limited conflicts. This need may 
well be met by several types of aircraft 
which are now in various stages of de- 
velopment or under consideration 



l j roposed versions ot a Light Aimed 
Reconnaissance Aircraft would permit 
its use for .strike and defenses suppres- 
sion missions as well as ;i mo.st suitable 
aircraft for our Forward Air Oontrol- 
lers. As you may know, thesis men, liven 
in their light observation plants, have 
established ;i remarkable record in Viet- 
nam in spotting enemy attackers and 
directing South Vietnamese and Ameri- 
can strike aircraft against them. The 
previously mentioned YK-iy would be 
invaluable under conditions whore we 
do not enjoy sole possession of thi? sky 
ami when; our transports mid helicop- 
ters would bo subject to attack liy en- 
nmy fighters. 

Our airlift forces, which providi! the 
mobility so vital to Lho management of 
crises as well a.s in the conduct of local 
wars, will lx> strengthened grout! y by 
the recently operational 0-.M 1 trans- 
port and, later, by tin: huge C-fJA which 
is now under development. The Air 
Force is also interested in several proj- 
ects for the development of n V/KTOL, 
that is, an aircraft that can take oil' und 
land vertically or in a very short, .space, 
Such an aircraft may prove very useful 
for assault airlift, in addition to other 
tactical missions. 

I will not dwell on our extensive 
research and development ell'orLs m 
the supporting areas, in equipment 
and in special munitions for conven- 
tional wars in thin article. May it suf- 
fice to say that the future will find 
the Air Korco evor better prepural 
and equipped in every respect to carry 
out its mission at any level of conllid. 
And now a brief word about the 
space threat. It instill too early to speak 
about such a threat except in terms of 
potential. Nor can we foretell whether 
that threat would be posed by the 
Soviets alone, by the Rod Chines, or 
conceivably by some other nation which, 
in the course of time, may acquire nn 
offensive space capability. 

Hut, in the. fmit place, our future M- 
curity demands that w look fur abend 
with regard to any potential muico 
threat. Secondly, history shown that 
military wcupoiw and strategy tenil lo 
exploit every possible medium for of- 
fensive action, and we must assume! that 
this might also bo true for space. Our 
only alternative, thoreCore, IH to learn 
as much as we can about the Hpace me- 
dium so that, if and when u threat 
.should begin to materialise, we have the 

(Van Untied on Pitf/u 21) 
April 1966 




SPEAKERS CALENDAR 



FFICE or nrK S ,cr RETARY DEPAR ENT OF THE NAVY ,. N o, , ,... Mllv ,,, 

OF DtFENSl: ItAilm. I',. H. Xmiuvnll, < \ 



V i.i... i , ,.,,1,,..,! ... . , , v , , {: >'niM'i' Iti-.'ilniyiT KlolMla V, nl Arnii-il 

., .,, lt , ^. t , :; v ''v 111 /' 1 ' 1 '^ 1 : Nll V" 1 ! ''" m " ; "> l.iin.-l,,,m, Kn^o, dnlil'., 

Mi, Uilltiini It. lYUi, hn . |),!,n,..- ll -y' | i'>l, til i\iu'y 'Nalimial Ni'runly ,May ;:n, 

; ; ;X .'^.'^.'ih'i^'-;;;:;;/'; 1 . 1 !:;;;, 1 , 1 , 1 ,,;;'. 1 A-^^ ;''iviiifP ; u'' l '' : i l ''r' v T''^^f i ' i 

I.... \,,,-t. . .'..I.). M.,.. l, ;! ; - <" An,,.,-!,-,,,, llnhmun. A,',,,/ ^l"" A.lin.iii:.lr.-.li..ii AHSI.. ( nii^r 

.Mi, Mi-nit \, \\.ill. ,..-, U. ..,.,[,!,! fl'H^ ( I; ','| 1 ' | fr " 1 '' ' l| ';; lil "- "" Niiviit M. 



,! 



I I, 



'V 1 '-''"": 1 "; 1 .- " r 'i May ',!; a! Nnvy/ 

;:.-!'iH\ ' ..t 'i'vHih.-.rplli!!;/ \','. .'i'm't" jl"','.' 11 ^ "".''j^" 1 Mnt.-.'inl (-.inmmnil, 

ju.r : . L. An (: . -I.... r.,hi . M,,'. IV M^v':." " tlf: " ' t!|lllf " 

U' \ilni. Hi.tn-i i II, \m limn 



DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 




DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 




Htm. I'.niMI. Nil/t'.^mvriiiy of Hi.' (int. .1. I 1 . Md'tHim-ll, riiii-r ,.|' StnM', 

''''' ; (t .-'iif'.-"!! i Ifin-riil-. I'nnlVi- I'. N. Air l-'in-fi-, al I'tiimril mi Fi.n'ijin 

". \\ (i -hin 1 ;!'.n i |i r. .\piil :\'i; al Ui-ljiliun:!, N.-\\- Vnr| v Cily, A|iril !!S. ' 

' '"'' !t i .' ""V."'"" 1 !',' 1 ,, 11 " 1 .. N ' il ^" MnJ. lien. ||. I. iMinh. CiiiiinitiiiiiiT. 

' I 'li; I I M.'li , i' ", "> V : i|l!liv s .v- li '' 1 "" i l | fv. (AI-'HC),,,! AI.MM- 

. M I'lMiild. lui-l nf i,.,,,, Snnrty r.irlJiinlMy Cunlrnl Mn-1 

;-' ' '';;; '", Al , ( , llV \^"V I' ':. I ."." An ( ..H, ; ;, ('alii'., Mav M; nl 

' " l1 ;: 1 " f'unm-K ,. 1,1., April .JH; ,\rn. C|.|],, Iltitnil,,. N, V., Mav HH. 

'" 11 III I iilli'l'i' .Milll! I'niiii'i'l' .... 

=, . M.,'. ;-;i ^.m !|i ..Hi.,,\. H| . lKi ( , ( . U] ,,_ iL Mrl ., |lr|M)Hi | >h . h| 

, , . . r , ,., . , Aliiiut-'iiaiin- iV; Muni rinit ( A I''I.< '). 

" (Ipl, (ffMlirt' I,. S It'l'I, ( tllllllltllll l-l- .If A, .!',!., .!!..., l.'l, .( I.- ,,,i (' . I' , 

I , , ,. . "'"'> i " i i ' tit .-\''i tijipttri 1 r,lri-l i niiiir!. I nil | ri ri H 'i', 
i .. . ...'..' i 'i.'' ' ,'. ' ' ." I ay Inn, Oh HI, Mny I', , 

"' ,M. (H'.i. T. P, (Jt^.-Htv, Drfi. chi.-f 



, 

't jriin Ih,'ilitiMi< nt 1 Inilii'i! ritil Dn 
'i-Hi M.-i'liiijf, :-!:m t-'nniciiirii, Calir, 



11 ' . M',l . 

HUM U illiui.i M 

''' ' '/-I >, "f !!n \s 

I.). !. , l.^M!. St* ), ,;1 |f 



Mtlj, (.> U li,-im if* N 

I 1 -!- ' t\-.'t. '. i! ->. ,i t;. H. 

\ 1 1 S ) ! 1 i ! ^ f 1 i , l : i i ; i I t ; , i ; .- 

M. .lh >(: . \V nK.nj.i-.;,, ). 
Vlftj, lull, llnlfllul U, 

' ''Uillf:. \Snijl-.S; ' ' l'i"l li, "it !', '. Vi > 



IE!)* I, 



M-iJ 



'..n. I limit ., ltiiliiivi-1* t. (i, ,- 

!,.,-. ,.. r..i, "! '.-i,.i, :,? A--"'.i.. 

i: ,!! r i^sHuMt.i "j ii ''1' . ', .1,^ 

.^if^vi, h t , M., . , 

. Mfinli'V li. IU--.MI, . :> 'i mi i' 

' 



!.I (rtrji, I,. J, 



DOD, NASA Sign New Manned 
Space Flight Cooperation Agreement 

i^. |trj. ; u!HL.-ii! *.| t''-r.'ii!u- unit Hv.i.h,- luall.'i'a mnri-niiiii; Dm mu- 

ff.; ,Wt',yi'Mi A.'i fi !(iiHfirr; ini'l Hniin* Mini [mi In-iimliuu in ami 'iiippni'L nf 

H'n ii'.ru! jf^s th>' i''t>l<tiliittlti|i nf U'llirll I'illlll"! lie |'i>)in|vt'll ill, II IllWi'l' 

:-:<u j<i,iin,..t ,].!< ,-r Mltiht I'K'irutiiiu, l"v.'l. 

H;i )i(i-iii-'S iiM'butl *f U it'll 1 ( iit ill III ( . . ,, , ,- ,, 

J i-!M J i." llciVli'i' ^.rivt'iiv " ''I 1 * 1 ' 1 " 1 '" "' Ml'- < iHlllilllli'l! IU'1' 

(M .-li";'; M t -N','nun'i niitl NASA Ail- $W vl }': W' i aiimii!i, Jr., NASA 

M- ,', .f.-i 'l.iim', I-' W.-Mi MM ., Ut'imty AiliiniMtitniLnr, unil Dr. ,|i)lui 

. U- * ^i ^ -ir, ^j t ,)IU 1 | i , |1 1 JIM ,TU||I| I i .t i , t i , . i ., _ , 

, j, ... (|, t . (,,,, '[ p, t ; ! iu'i.M-iiinil '"' " ilt ' 1 ' - 1 '-. l'ilt'i'f,oi* nf |li>h>)irif 

-i^^ ((,.' fvlv/'U-.-nr,.',; n.nr.-H,|,i K ltl>l|ll "''' " lll! I'll'Kin.rfJnK- 
?- (..uiiin i'i i^'iiiiii nu! f%titi|Uih>->i ihlii'f iiti'inlii'i'd nn; Daiiii'l ,1, 

i >.!! NAN A HI HI ('"itiutiut't' Kintt. l'c|itily Iliiri'lor, I h-ft'iifii- !{*- 

!:,,-,(! ;l!r Ml* MjllUK'il S|.!lCt' I' li^tlt Hl'illvll JUlll i'JIlf I lll'l'l'i UK ( Ht I'lll l'|.;|r 

("-1*1,1, r=.iMsi!!t-'. Ulnl Splli'i 1 Syjtli'iu.'U ; |i|'. Alt'SllinItT 

U Hhi K ! '''>l'!'"' - |il''tviili-l liy Die "; l''l*^. Aiisi.'hml .Si'rn-lill'j' nf Die 

'n-oiitsy..J li.-frii^' niiil Mi* 1 Ailiuiii- Aii 1 rmvf iUtl)); !>''- 'ii'tirn.' M, 

iis^ 1 !,.! ..f N'AWA. t!t^ i-iiHiiitliv will Miirllt-i', NASA Atfiurititc Ailiuinititi it 

M. irnm' *(( J'-trl p"lii i v f'lii't'i hiinf '"!' ''"' Miunictt Spun' l-'litflit; liiul Mr. 

*,it* M-ouj'-'t SMJM-H- FIiKlil I'l'iKi'Jiin. H-'in* 1 "' K. N't'wi'll, NASA A.iHnclnti- 

j-.u3*- sin 1 nn.inmi**iM iifuniilitK "f Hii- AiltiiiniHtniUir fur .S|mt'ti HpJtsuci* uiul 

tit Urns itrvti, tuiil Aiii'lit'atiuii, 



DtfnM Ifldwslry 




4drfrt""t I'll Me Honorable Robert W. 
Anthony, .-W. Secretary of Defense 
(Controller), at the DOD Advanced 
I'lnminu Briefing* for Industry, Box- 
t>,n, .!/.., March 3, 1966. 




Hon. Robert N. Anthony 

Resource Management 

Systems 

********* 5;. * it 

First of all, what do we mean 
by Resource Management Systems? 
Nothing very exotic, nothing very mys- 
terious. The word "resource" in this 
context means labor, materials and serv- 
ices. Looked at as resources, labor, ma- 
terials and services can most easily be 
described and measured in dollar terms 
and, therefore, the common denomina- 
tor used in our Resource Management 
Systems is usually monetary, In broad- 
est terms, we mean by Resource Man- 
agement Systems all the systems that 
aid DOD management in their task of 
assuring that resources are obtained 
and used both effectively and efficiently 
in the accomplishment of DOD objec- 
tives. That is a pretty theoretical defi- 
nition. The term may become more 
meaningful if I list the principal types 
of systems that arc included within it. 
These are; 

Programming and budgeting, 
which is the process of deciding on our 
goals and the resources we need to reach 



these goals, and of justifying those 
needs to the Congress. 

a The management of resources for 
operating activities, that is the combat 
forces and the associated support and 
command establishment that make up 
the Department. 

9 The management of inventory and 
similar assets, which is the process of 
controlling the millions of items that 
flow through our supply system. 

a The management of the acquisition, 
utilisation and disposition of capital as- 
sets, which is the process of getting the 
weapon and support systems of the 
quality and configuration we need, on 
schedule, and at lowest cast. 

Incidentally, I don't want to leave the 
impression that the systems do the man- 
aging of these functions, Quito the con- 
trary. Managers human beings do 
the managing, of course, and the sys- 
tems are no more than collections of pro- 
cedures, forms and reports that help the 
managers do their job. r, at least, they 
are intended to help managers do their 
job. For we must admit the possibility 
that a system may be nothing more than 
a paperwork exercise;, that is, useful 
only in that it provides jobs for large 
numbers of clerks, 

Let mo now focus on the fourth Rom 
the management of the weapon and 
support systems acquisition process. 
As I mentioned earlier, this is the realm 
of the relationship between you as de- 
veloper and producer, and the DOD as 
customer, a relationship that may begin 
even before a contract 1ms been signed, 
and that lasts through the completion of 
the contract. You can call this the 
DOD-contractor interface, and you can 
describe and deal with it in at toast 
three different ways, depending on your 
point of view. 

The project manager in the Defense 
Department gees it as the problem of 
extracting fronv contractors the infor- 
mation that he believes he needs to keep 
track of progress, and also the infor- 
mation he might possibly need to an- 
swer as yet undefined questions of pro- 
gram sponsors, budget analysts and his 
superiors. The project manager wants 
data tailor made to his individual speci- 
ficationsgeneral enough to be under- 
standable, and detailed enough to keep 



him out of trouble when questions , 
asked by someone up the Una And, 
course, lie wants the data to have t 
virtues of accuracy, timeliness, audi 1 
bility and zero cost. Simple enough a 
fail 1 enough- f rom bis point of view, 
I don't need to tell this audience hi 
the contractor sees the problem. 
might ho an exaggeration to say Unit 
would prefer unlimited funding, an i 
definite amount of time and mi si a I 
reporting during the period between t 
signing of the contract and delivery 
product and bill. Hut not too much 
an exaggeration. 

This top managers in DOD the 81 
rotary of Defense, his principal ass 
hints, the senior ollicials of t-h Milila 
Departments and Defense agencies 
have a different and perhaps broad 
concern.. They must live with the o 
vious disparities between tJio points 
view of the Defense project manaf,' 
and the contractor but, morn impo 
tantly, they must' represent tlie pub] 
interest. No matter how good tlio pc 
lateral for disengagement-UK' top ma 
agement of DOD is never relieved of i 
responsibility to guard national sficu 
ity and he a wine steward of ' piuM 
resources. 

I Miring tin. 1 la.il. decade, Hit 1 MiliUn 
Department.;! Imvo developed ami |iti 
dm;ed a wide variety uf weapon nr 
support systems, and thoy have abuli 
signed a wide variety of mEitiiiEcniw 
systems for dealing with them* nwjr 
acquisitions. Each manager luis HOJII 
rately wrestled with the problem of di 
vising u system for describing plan: 
for meafiiiring and controlling 
against those plans, and for r 
experience, so that the estimating un 
management .job could b<! dime Iwlto 
the next time. The result has hron 
proliferation of systems, reports mi' 
neronyimi. 

The names of these .systems ar 
familiar to most of you: PERT Titiw 
PERT Cost, Critical Path Mctlioc 
PROMPT, IMIS, Line of Balana 
Earned Value Reporting;, PEMARi 
and CKISto name just a few, 

Horo again it will be helpful to (i 
some classifying within this coNectio 
of systems that wo have labelled Acqui 
sition Information and Mnnagemcn 



April 196 



maU hril.'i '.-.hii.,,!.-. ami i., T ...lia1e "' , ! "' ;i ' imp-we nol mily Urn ii 

mure kii.iu-h-ihvi'l'l.v. "i, I!,,- h ; , ,t : ,,( ' N '" w w1 "'"' 'In we .-;him| \vilh re- fnmi anumK alU'rimUvtitt, Imt H!HO thi< 

evp, i -u-n.v. In 11 ,,.-o,ml ,-alr, : ,,ry an- all ''"'!'' '" ','"' ni;il l '" IIlTt ltl " y"l''"Ui7 An m'l'euiily In ni^K' 1 " tmiKlMilinilril 

1 1,,, var in. 1h.l . Hi;.! h;n,< li.-.-n ,| r >V '.'".' "'' "' ;l) iu " lui l|i/I11 '"" Wllfl l"'" l ^"''ii"'il. "' wu lire In .to our proper 

vrinpi',1 hy ll'|i pi, -in-! iiiiiMai-.-i;: I'm 1 ril "" ! r ''-l'> (1'ivil iiiut Knmnmir Infm' J 11 ' 1 '" nnilrae.1, ne^ntial inn, we nni.-il 

im-HMu nir I'M.ri.-., ^f-ain .1 iii\ .'Inn lllfll| "n Sy:.(rtn). Thf imilivalioii In ili- '"ivi- Ihi- capability |i> rnlitntili' co;il.;i 

('I 1 . IS i-anm i'rutn the rrni);nilinn iiiitt'|i('H<leiil. ni' I|HI;H' propn:ti'(l hy our 







'"' VH, " '''! itllillr.'l will always he liUM'e iii'l'liral-'. 

... ., . . . ,. ,, , . I' 1 ] "mlriii rii/.i r;,|iin:ilivi mi mainr ' aMI !iI >.viiiK IMH! u ncil. e:;liiniile nn'ivi-il 

" r vr '" ' J ''"'l HI'' til 1 .! l'l,.ll|i I i.', I . . ,,.. , ,1 , ,, ,. , 

\"-ii|)'Ui .y.ih-iir-. I I, IS imivi-i IhniuMi ' IhnmKM tue pmi'e:t:i of n iliiildKUH In-- 



, ,, . ,, , , "i)' ..-iir-. , imivi-i IniuMi nmKM ue pmi'e:t:i o n iiiidKUH n- 

Illli'l IMilll'Ml h-']Hi|l,. ltl | t | l) H . .-ci.ii.l .1 l I , , f i ,, , . 

., ,- ( . ( _ ., , ,^ ' 'hi- ,!-vi'],.|iinnil |nnr,';,:, li.r H.'jtrly lu-<i I WITH mi mlnuiii'd lii'lli-i 1 mid ILII lll 

*| . ' ', '' \'\" ' ' ' ''_"", ",'!".' 'Y" n! " X'-i 1 ',, '['hi -, , I, -)il, I'D, I. nil,- (,|' |irii^i-c;i.| l'"inn'i| liuyi'r will hi! mure iniiliiully 

.... . ' ' ."'' '* (l ' " ['in v.ii . i!h ihiilal'lr mil t<> iinv ih'i-rcii'H 1 in Mil iiil'iU'lin'v Iliiui a nuil. rul iniiil c itr- 

hiii' 1'i-iiili- ini.ti'iiui! I'fii-i inn jirliM- .1 i < ' ' i , , , n , , , ,1 

. t i _ " " lr 'li'KHT nt ni|;'ii,-y uiiil rciliiiuly iml I ' 1V|1( I ^' uiillnlr rally hy (Hit- (uirly In Uir 

'"' : ' '' l! '' '"'" ( " ' ' '"'"'' til1 ! t.t ln,-l. (!' i-M'iMl n n ill,, pa,') ,,f ||,i. ,1,, n-)',iiliali)n. We, lint, liuvc a llniinl IN!' 



i- i'l. 
. ..... , . 

...>..|., rrm.-.-riiMir Hi,- luihirc nl' idc "H"^' I"' uMi- In isii! utly. 

I r|i:ii MlU'Si! .if,. I n,l>i,!i S ','nt|!,| .lilt ,< , 

.,., ,,, , ,., ,,,,,,. ,, , it<ill ,., I' 1 " 1 ' 1 "'"- "v-.'.'.omrnH.MraUMlnp,,-! w ,- |.n M ..,:;,. h, ..l.taiu Ihis ,-MimMlily 

. I,,].,,,,, ..onp-.t.)..!.!- ..nn'iu ""' 'V' "" lt ' lt " Is " /'" :t " " rim "'' Tl1 " 1 ''- In .l.-riv- i...l.-|H'ii'l.-n( n, ;i | rflinml..:. by 

"""' 1; ' Vlll "' I " < - i- m'l 



,. 
* 



/.'ll'.. 1 -.HIT'' ' ' '.I l-'lH'iv 1 tistt M 

' 



, j)]( "" fnifl iiii]i|nirt :iyjil-'iiiM in u.'St-ful arraya 

.^ T 1 - 1 " M-iu;. of il'-vr!,i|inii'nl, n-vicw. iunl Ihi'ii, I'nllnwiiiK a varirly nf wiilely 

n-n,|y in .- i ,!, )!,-,- ,,> ,|j.,|,., j,, f ,,,,,, ,..;,,,, ""Miii. -nl am) atTimiiilntiiMi have -'ii'i'r-plril :il al i;i| ical pnnviliinM, extni- 

iMl !im 1 1" 1 1 Sn,'}, .1,1 , n ,.i ; , . , H ,(,., ' i-ij-ij;! 1 tin- MI iciiial i'n -a tnir, I !K| S, |i> pi'lal iiiir 1'riiiii ;>iii'h a ilalu hank I he pn 

v.av 11 i, jn -.<tiH,l I,-, ,'i (. -, |, , ,,. ''"' I'" 1 ' 1 ' ''Vh.'H' >,vi' ih-i'tili',1 tn iri'(i (! ni/,. It-atial cn:iln nf rnlliiw.ini !iy;ilein:i, Itii'l- 

pl.-crp! . Ihiil I ;};.. >!,! ,,;,,, , , , J, , (,, : " ! '' 1't''! ;(l!t.i| Jiin.'rM ivllh a ni'W llHlllr, ''''"' ;l ' ' >' ll lnH^h Wmt< ]ll''l|lh' Jll'KUt' 

-,,,u: ' lt: "'"'f liihi!niali,.M I!.-|M.I Inl , Ami '' ial ' 1"' iliflVrennvi hi-lwri-n ii|irri>;iMive 

..,. . . , t !">hv, iii'tri- !\v.. nm|i.r imhiiitry IT r.'-m-raliiimi in u'rainm ntnl ;mppurl 

,),.,,., M j. ,, ,,,'. '"' >' '- i< v. -, i 'H; i-. VM-II HH iln- i,im| to inijih' . ! '.Vi'l''in:i rinnilii';! maki' .-mrh an a]i 

t . ' ' * )t(| jj.,^1,,,! |iui;ii'h inlVaftitilr, I lie Carl fit Ihul we 

1 '"'111' !'"< 11"' i H' . h< , ]m i c jsi,.( i)nl'!i' i i i , 

, , , , M - i ,!,!.., - iiMvmly Imve eunuch eM pern-nee In 

''' '" "-hi.' nuil..,!!-, n,. ;,.,,,,;,- A' ' < "<!,-, l m th'- .liiti, -i'lm- , .. , ,, ,., 

, , !.-, Kmiw Hint, il wil worli, 

V.lll-lV Ml.. I Mil ,.,!->- .,i ,, S .nnii-, M'.rS'.f /<U',:u,", lE.-.f. 1 , !''jlll",l-iltilllV.-:-. Of ill 



'u',liy v.v , ,, t: 1V ,. (,,, ,, un j, mv 

-)-!,li )! njij,,.; ttuuly ! n-vi-\v pi, ! inn ;1 ' v " ^''"'"'iny '',V vncitMUi i i<|jj(':;riitlll ivi-si 

" in ' lll(lf( -' " f r 'I' : I- ; ni"l 'IIJ an.l lu "'' iii'lii'il''!'. What lii-rurt mi u |ini|iu:itil 

''-iiim.-H.I Di'-isiitMii.tii'.. What in ''' K 11 ' 1 "' 1 ' iitt'onnnliini mi ill ..... ?il i-vi-ry 

'""' t'")"!'.!!^. m..-,! i,i' it,.- ivn.m iVI't- "f lui'K' 1 I'liiriiiviui-nl lu ihi- micil 

i' 1 "!''"! in-'litlr,tl 5 Mr, n.tv.- l.rii uirnr <'M<'"-'>ivr <|Hail Mini in a H^i'My |iiv 

}'.>:;-,',. .S !!] !if hU- 1 if ',1-1 .imi ni' Ihf ;i\-,i :l1 '' ""''' I'" 1 ' 11111 ' l" l!l '''' :ilKMillr[llil ly 

li "-''- lli:i J!<il " ""->'' -" l '-''' !' ! ' ..,11 \V- ,.- trial.-fiil f.ti- (linn. Tliry ...... !il '"' 11 ' "' " w PI'l'''!l "Illy hi air 

''- j (<tlij , S1M(! , M , 11 . ,.,,. )(1M)( , wnilia ,,,,, r ,,; H-itl'l, nu .,1, ami ti|nnv nynh-nm; n-- 

.i.-ln-^iv v (1 Ui.<ni ,.;!,-) kll.-hitf Hit- ilatn t|"''-'ti''liiiliit. a hluh l-vi-l nl' nuiilinurl 

.. t ,.j...| hy ]t, i,., t ..,. iiimly .1-1. Tin-. ; ' lllin "; ""'t. with III" urn* fxnjillim "'f 

' - - 






1 ;'' 1 "'" 1'="' il1 ' I'"' '"' ..... I,,,- ,,r ln-f,.,,.,,. H,,; ( -arh ami KI, K | 
,-i -v-lv,,^ iMlu.. H yn. in^an.wiirUiMrl.iK.'U.'-M.MMsm 



Illi' worli lire 

ami Inulin (In- imiiir fur ('\i:,\ liil'itnua 

tinn Ue|n.itinK li:i il. ilrte.-i fur TuaUK"- 

I >!,* n'. Mifve it ii m .-*'>!!^u v 1 re l'iile.'i:i fin-re an- very Hpi'i-ial ciiTnnt- 

vi !*., hi-J-sy nf liif I'Ult atl.-inpi.'i !'t>"'' 1J i that make it imiienilive, (MU 

1 1 1!.--,.- sni'jj ,^s* ?'ii*-S i.i"! 'in.'isi ?t ! t!:-ni'!'i' iviih Uii* j.i'il'li ni "f rjitiiniil ^'" ""' '"' iipplii'il rt-lrniietively. Ami 

'if*. 'i'.Diti 1 !;-.^ !'!(*!,;-(* })', j,i .'Ui,i( ,!i^ ;:iir' i-..'.; ( f v,Tiijn>)i uiul mipimrt whal ahmit, .'iulH-mil raetmvi? In air-- 

MI iH<-f!!: S l( ', ,is ii- wU. >4v,ii 5 H;ws; > s:..-!(i 'o T '' twjMi'twii I'eiihiii'^ tlnHii niift, iiii.'iiitte unit tipiii'e prnKi'iuim cer- 

;)it'| <!. ii,rtj 1H r1 r ij rutB*is^; ;;,(>". !j,n j-.ti?.' i5u<t jM'iJii.-jii, \W nuiflt utilise (la? tain iinijiM 1 MilinMilnit'litni will In; re- 



InMuslry Bulliln 19 



(jiii red by DOD to submit their own, 
separate Cost Information Reports, 
either directly to DOD or via the prime 
contractor, depending on the agreement 
between the prime and the subcontrac- 
tor. Generally these will be subcon- 
tractors in the ovcr-$50 million cate- 
gory. Costs of all other subcontractors 
will be summarized by the prime, and 
no separate reporting will be required 
by DOD. 



CII1 is composed of five forms: 

A contract cost data report, sum- 
marizing total costs to date on a con- 
tract, by work breakdown structure 
clement, will cover all activities in- 
cluded in a contract or proposal. 

A functional cost-hour report may 
be used to collect additional cost sup- 
port for certain of these elements. 

_ * A progress curve report, also op- 
tional and also employed selectively, 
will provide the unit or average unit 
cost (dollars and manhours) of the unit 
or lot accepted during the reporting 
period. 

* A fiscal year data report, sum- 
marizing program estimates by fiscal 
year for relevant work breakdown 
structure elements may be requested. 

* Similarly, a fiscal year functional 
cost-hour report may be required with 
separate reports prepared for recur- 
ring and nonrecurring costs. 

Cin is currently being processed 
through the Bureau of the Budget. 
JVhere applicable, it replaces other 
forms such as the DCPR series and the 
UD 1177. The Military Departments 
are staffing for its implementation, and 

we expect that it will be in operation on 
selected new contracts before the end 
of June. 

Four of the five reports mentioned 
above are both optional and selective. 
You may be dubious about our willing- 
ness to exercise such optionality or 
selectivity with restraint. In order to 
insure that this is in fact done, we are 
setting up a new mechanism that re- 
tires the data that a project manager 
proposes to collect be screened and ap- 
proved in advance by a high level re- 
view group. Under this procedure, the 
cost data requirements to be incorpo- 
rated w.thm a given contract, or series 
of contracts.for a given weapon or sup- 
port system will be submitted by the 
appropriate Military Department to the 
umce of the Secretary of Defense for 
v W . During this review, the pro 
f Sed <f d *ta Acquirements will be ex 
ammod for adherence to standards a*d 



appropriateness of degree of detail 
specified. Any additional or unique data 
requirements will have to be completely 
justified before approval will be 
granted. This procedure is designed as 
an insurance policy against undesirable 
proliferation. If successful, it may be 
extended to cover not only cost data, but 
other kinds of nontechnical data. 

In recent years, representatives of in- 
dustry have viewed with alarm what 
they believed to be a trend on the part 
of DOD toward a requirement for a 
single standard accounting system for 
industry. I can say categorically that 
we have no such intention. We believe 
it is far better to make full use of exist- 
ing effective contractor management ac- 
counting systems, each designed to meet 
the contractor's own needs, then to 
dream up a standardized strait jacket 
that, however well intontioncd, would 
probably meet no one's needs. There 
are many different ways of putting to- 
gether effective management systems, 
and they need not be exactly similar. 

There is, however, a need to define 
what we mean by effective management 
accounting. Here we are looking for 
three principal characteristics: 

* Costa are charged as incurred; 
that is, when, and only when, work is 
performed. For example, a material 
cost is charged to an account not when 
a purchase order is cut, but when re- 
sources are actually applied. 

* Every reasonable effort is made to 
segregate from a general overhead ac- 
count those items that can be considered 
directly attributable overhead and is 
thus directly chargeable. 

* The system is completely auditablc 
from the entry on the report directly 
back to the accounting system. 

The detail needed by the project man- 
ager is obviously not required at the 
OSD level. The forms will permit pro- 
gresswey higher summamations of 
data. The principal vehicle for this will 
be an integrated work breakdown 
structure. The idea of focussing mT 
agerial attention to component ele- 
ments of a weapon < 



fa, " * a 

family of weapon systems is still sub- 
ject to problems of definition, bu ? i 
understood well enough by most ia 
ticipants in the weapons aTqu Lt.on 
Process to permit its generalTpn a 
n in management control. " 



20 



i 

will employ a sim j, ai . approach 
t0 the "* * work breakdown 



structures. The existence of such ; 
structure, which is simply a hierarclr 
or pyramid of the elements which imikl 
up a weapon or support system, will al 
low the assembly of data at any level 01 
detail desired. It will be the frameworl 
upon which the management informa 
tion will hang. 

Secretary McNumnra often recall* 
the two general instructions given him 
by President Kennedy in January, 
196.1. These were in essence: 

Develop the military forcn struc- 
ture necessary to support our policy. 

Procure and operate this force at 
the lowest possible cost. 

These twin mandates still stinul and 
demand that we exercise a decree of 
management attention which dom not 
exist in other parts of the market 
place. We simply assert that this dual 
responsibility can beat 1m Hnti.sfied 
when DOD and industry work to- 
gether in understanding. I think a 
good example of how such cooperation 
can work in practice is to bo Cmmd in 
the evolution of GIR. 

Finally, some words about tin; work 
we are doing, in cooperation with the 
stair of the Assistant Secretary of De- 
fense (Installations and Logistics), to 
simplify ami standardize perfornmncc 
measurement systems which IK)]') proj- 
ect managers impose on contractors and 
in-house activities alike. Ono survey 
that I looked at recently found fi8 or 
more different (or at least diflV-rently 
named) systems in use where there was 
an interface of I)OI) project mumpers 
and weapon system contractors. That's 
too many. Stating and agreeing on 
plans for phased progress of develop- 
ment and production, in terms of mile- 
stones, dollars and technical accom- 
plishment, and then measuring prog- 
ress against such plans just cannot bo 
sch a variable task that f>8 or more 
procedures, reports and information 
systems are needed for it. Right now 
wo are listing and analyzing these mnn- 
crous systems, and hope very soon to 
find in them the useful least common 

f nnn mt V Which wili mcct; UlG " c <'8 
oi i-HJD management as a whole. Huv- 

iff done this, we hope to develop stand- 
ard contractual language on perform- 
ance measurement which does ,,ot 
specify procedural detail, but docs spell 
out criteria and general characteristics, 

Without changing effective manage- * 
to." in mS n Byflto . S US ? d by C ntr " c - 

nf i L Spcl * out ^ le characteristics 
ot a data converter which will make 



April 1966 



the track from performance to sum- 
(*sa mary reports both reliable and useful. 
You will hear more about our work in 
this fleld of performance! measurement 
systems as this year goes on. Among 
other things, we expect to relate this 
performance measurement effort to 
Contractor Performance Evaluation in 
a meaningful way. The target for com- 
pleting the performance measurement 
effort is December of this year. 

I have thus attempted to explain the 
particular and peculiar requirements of 
the DOI) which make necessary the 
creation and imposition of broad man- 
agement systems. Systems such as I 
! have described potentially affect all of 
you, and the question can legitimately 
be asked what's in it for me? 

All industry, but most particularly, 
small and medium-sized business! 
should benefit from the consolidation of 
many diverse performance measure- 
ment systems into a single coordinated 
approach. 

The cost data banks, from which cer- 
tain kinds of non-proprietary data will 
eventually be made available to indus- 
try, should provide a rich source of 
information. 

The practices of close coordination 
with industry during systems develop- 
ment, and thn policy of providing reas- 
onably lengthy periods for industry 
review will be continued, and should 
produce workable results. 

The policy of utilizing, rather than 
changing, effective industrial account- 
ing systems should reduce any fears 
that the DOD will ultimately insist 
upon a standard accounting system. 

Finally, the institution of the data 
plan review process at the OSD love] 
should go a long way toward prevent- 
ing the imposition of excessive or inap- 
propriate data requirements on contrac- 
tors, 

While the DOD maintains its need to 
know and to manage, it continually at- 
tempts to recognize and alleviate the 
problems of industry, 

A great deal of thought and effort is 
being devoted to tho development of 

these systems, to make them responsive 
and useful, but not uselessly burden- 
some, 

In this continuing effort to manage 
the interface between Government and 
industry, all of us as citizens need the 
benefit of all tho accumulated wisdom 
and experience of both sides. We need 
from industry not only response and 
reaction, but affirmation and construc- 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



tive ingenuity in devising new ways to 
improve this interface. For it is both 
enlightened self-interest and practical 
patriotism for all of us to join in seeing 
to it that Defense dollars do their full 
duty for our country. 

Trends in AF R&D 

(Continued from Page 16) 

knowledge and "building blocks" to de- 
velop a proper defense against it. 

The Manned Orbiting Laboratory 
(MOL) program, for which the Air 
Force received the go-ahead last year, 
will contribute greatly to our knowledge 
of man's usefulness in space. It is not 
an aggressive program because it poses 
no military threat to anyone. In fact, 
all our space programs are peaceful, 
either in helping to maintain peace 01- in 
providing peaceful benefits. But coop- 
erating with the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration, the Air 
Force must provide its share to the 
mounting store of space knowledge and 
experience. I am confident that, as a 
result, we will he better prepared tn 
deal with any military threat from or 
in space that may arise in the future. 
In conclusion, I want to make a com- 
ment about the role of research in con- 
tributing to our technological superi- 
ority. The term "research and develop- 
ment" lias almost become one word, with 
the emphasis on development. Yet, most 
of the technological advances that arc 
reflected in our weapon systems today 
had their start in some research labora- 
tory. 

We in the Air Force recognize the 
many independent contributions Ameri- 
can industry has made through its re- 
search activities, and I encourage your 
continued efforts in striving for ad- 
vances in technology which have poten- 
tial military applications. To the 
civilian and military scientists of the 
Air Force as well as to their colleagues 
in science and industry, to whom we 
owo these advances, I want to hold out 
a challenge. 

Let us strive not merely for continu- 
ing advances in the state of the art but 
for technological breakthroughs so 
great that they become, in effect, "tech- 
nological leaps." Such a leap was repre- 
sented by the development of the atomic 
bomb which, to this day, has assured our 
nuclear superiority and thereby pre- 
vented general war. What would this 
world be like if the atomic bomb had 
first been developed by the Soviets? 

I mentioned the danger of techno- 
logical surprise. Let us be the ones who 



surprise our enemies with technological 
leaps so far-reaching that they would 
insure our superiority for years to 
come. That would be the greatest con- 
tribution which research and develop- 
ment could make to the cause of lasting 
peace with honor. 



Army to Buy 
New Huey Cobra Helo 

The U. S. Army plans to purchase 
an improved armed helicopter to re- 
place the armed UH-1B now in use. 
Tlie ew armed helicopter (Huey 
L-obra) will have greater range, speed 
and weapons payload. It incorporates 
the same transmission, engine and 
rotor system as the UH-1B in a new 
streamlined fuselage to g-ain greater 
performance and maneuverability. 

Selection of the interim armed heli- 
copter was the result of a need for 
an improved weapons helicopter which 
could be supplied quickly, at low cost 
and with the least impact on the 
Army s supply and training base. It 
will serve as the Army's armed heli- 
copter until the Advanced Aerial Fire 
Support System is available. 

First deliveries of the helicopter, 
which is built by Bell Helicopter Co. 
1-ort Worth, Tex., are expected by 
mid-1967. Deployment will take place 
as soon thereafter as possible. 

Missions for the new helicopter will 
be the same as its predecessors to 
escort troop-carrying helicopters and 
provide suppress fire in the land- 
ing zones to support airmobile opera- 
tions. 

The modified helicopter can be de- 
ployed directly from the production 
lino to field units without the need 
for retraining pilots and mechanics. 
In addition, maximum use of on-site 
spare parts will be possible. 



U.S. Marine Corps 
Advanced Procurement 
Information Available 

The U.S. Marine Corps has com- 
pleted procurement planning for three 
fiscal years for such items as genera- 
tor sets, special communications cen- 
tral, radio set, tractor and fuel ferry- 
ing assembly. The total dollar value 
of these procurements is on the order 
of $130 million. 

Complete information is available 
from Mr. J. W. McLain, Director, Pro- 
curement Division, Code CSG, Head- 
quarters, U.S. Marine Corps, Room 
4000, Arlington Annex, Washington, 
D.C. 20380, phone (Area Code 202) 
OXford 4-2582. Mr. McLain will be a 
counselor at the DOD/National Secu- 
rity Industrial Association Advance 
Planning Briefing for Industry, at the 
Sheraton - Park Hotel, Washington, 
D.C., April 27-28. 



21 




MEETINGS AND SYMPOSIA 



MAY 

Fifth Turbine Engine Lubrication 

Conference- Way 23-25, at the Granada 
Hotel, San Antonio, Tex. Co-sponsors: 
Air Force Aero Propulsion Labora- 
tory, Research and Technology Div. 
(AFSC), anil Southwest Research In- 
stitute. Contact: G. A. Beanc, Air 
Force Aero Propulsion Laboratory, 
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, (Area 
Code 513) 253-7111, 



JUNE 

Electromagnetic Windows Sympo- 
sium, June 1-3, at the Georgia 'insti- 
tute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga. Spon- 
sor: Air Force Avionics Laboratory. 
Contact: R. Ireland (AVWE-3), Air 
Force Avionics Laboratory, Wright- 
Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, Area 
Code 513) 253-7111, ext. 55720. 

Fifth U.S. National Congress of 
Applied Mechanics, June 14-16, at the 
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 
Minn. Sponsors; Air Force Office of 
Scientific Research, Office of Naval 
Research, Army Research Office, 
American Physical Society, American 
Society of Mechanical Engineers for 
Experimental Stress Analysis, Amer- 
ican Institute of Aeronautics and As- 
tronautics, American Mathematical 
Society, Society for Rheology and 
American Society for Testing and 
Materials. Contact: Maj. Lawrence P. 
Monahan, Jr., Army Research Office- 
Durham, Box CM, Duke Station, 
Durham, N.C. 27706, (Area Code 919) 
286-2285, 

International Conference on Crystal 
Growth, June 20-24, in Boston, Mass. 
Sponsor: Air Force Cambridge Re- 
search Laboratories. Contact: Charles 
S. Sahagian (CRWPC), Air Force 
Cambridge Research Laboratories, L. 
G. Hanscom Field, Bedford, Mass. 
01731, (Area Code 617) CR 4-6100, 
ext. 3298. 

Low Speed Aerodynamic Problems 
Associated with Helicopters and V/ 
STOL Aircraft, June 22-24, in Buffalo, 
N.Y. Co-sponsors: Army Aviation Ma- 
teriel Laboratories and Cornell Aero- 
nautical Laboratory, Inc. Contact: 
John E. Yea tea, Army Aviation Mate- 
riel Laboratories, Fort Eustis Va 
23(104, (Area Code 703) 878-4101. 

Second Rochester Conference on Co- 
herence and Quantum Optics, June 22- 
24, at University of Rochester, Roches- 
ter, N.Y. Co-sponsors: Air Force Office 
of Scientific Research and Air Force 



Cambridge Research Laboratories. 
Contact: Dr. M. C. Harrington 
(SRPP), Air Force Office of Scientific 
Research, Tempo D, 4th St. and Inde- 
pendence Ave. SW, Washington, D.C. 
20333, (Area Code 202) OXford 6- 
4464. 

Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on 
Quantitative Biology, dates undeter- 
mined, in Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. 
Sponsors: Cold Spring Laboratory for 
Quantitative Biology, Air Force Office 
of Scientific Research, National Insti- 
tute of Health, National Science Foun- 
dation and Atomic Energy Commis- 
sion. Contact: Dr. R. V. Brown 
(SRLA), Air Force Office of Scientific 
Research, Tempo D, 4th St. and Inde- 
pendence Ave,, SW, Washington, D.C, 
20333, (Area Code 202) OXford 0- 
4181. 



JULY 

Solid Propulsion Conference, week 
of July 18, in Washington, D.C. Co- 
sponsors: Intel-agency Chemical Rock- 
et Propulsion Group and American 
Institute of Aeronautics and Astro- 
nautics. Contact: P. J. Martin, Chem- 
ical-Propulsion Information Agency, 
8G21 Georgia Ave., Silver Spring, Md. 
20910, (Area Code 301) 589-7700, ext, 
5GO. 



AUGUST 

Eleventh International Symposiinr 
on Combii.sf.ion, Aug. :M-i!0, at tin 
University of California, Berkeley. 
Calif. Co-HpoiiKorK: Halli-sUc Research 
Laboratory and the. Combustion Insti- 
tute of Pittsburgh, 1'a. Contact: l)r, 
R. .1. Houston, Physical Sciences Div,, 
Army Research Office, .'tlMD Columbia 
Piko, Arlington, Vn., (Area Code 21)2) 
OXford 4-!M(ifi. 

Unguided Itockol ItalliHticH, Aug. 
30-Hept. 1, at TOXIIH Western College, 
El Paso, Tex. Sponsor: Army I'!le<s 
Ironies Research and Development 
Agency. Contact: V. C, Coclu-an, Army 
Electronics Research and Development 
Agency, White Kand.s Mi.ssile Ran in' 
N.M. SH002. 

Logic, Cmiiputabilily and Anlomala, 

date and place undetermined. (Jo- 
sponsors; I lushes Aircraft Co, and 
the Homo Air Development Center 
Contact: C. A, Constantino (I'IMID), 
Koine Air "Development Outer, (Jrif- 
flss AFB, N.Y. .I.'M'IO. 

Ocean ICUu'trniiicH Symposium, Hon- 
olulu, Hawaii, Aug. U!)-;il. Sponsor; 
Hawaii Section, Institute of Electrical 
and .Electronics Engineer.-! (IEKIO). 
Contact; Hubert U. Kill, Clmirman, 
IEEE Ocean Electronics Symposium 
Headquarters, J<M 1 Knpiolnni Illvd., 
Suite 1H20, HoiioliiHi, Hawaii, })()814. 



USAF Avionics Lab Plans Classified Briefing 



_ The Air Force Avionics Laboratory 
is planning a classified briefing for 
industry to be presented in a scries 
of regional meetings. The objective is 
to expand upon the Technical Objec- 
tive Document (TOD) Release Pro- 
gram and provide to industry more 
complete detail on the exploratory 
development programs of the labora- 
tory during 1 the next two years, The 
briefing is classified Secret. 

Presentations to be made at the 
briefing will be on: 

Mission, organization, personnel, 
funds and physical plant of the Air 
I'orce Avionics Laboratory. 

rP eflllitioils and interrelations of 
DOD program elements; technical 
domains of the Air Force Systems 
Command's Research and Technology 
Division (RTD); a nd Technical Objec- 
tive Documents. 

Recent achievements, existing 
programs and planned program for 

ing TODV arS " 6aCh f the follow - 
RTD 67-5, Avionic Communication. 
RTD 67-6, Bionics, Lasers and 

Molecular Electronics. 



22 



RTD fi7--:i!i, Triinsmi.HKioii and Ro- 
ccption Above 15 (i.U'H. 

iri'D fi7-:i5, Electromagnetic Vehi- 
cle hnvironmeiit, 

RTD 07-10, Kleetromawnetit! War- 
fare. 

NT-P^-S?, Navigation, Guidance 
and Dofcnso. 
RTD 67-28, Photo Materials and 

Optronics. 

RTD 07-29, Position and Motion 
Sensing:, 

RTD 07-84, Reconnaissance, 
Locations and dates of thu raootings 

are : h 

Dayton Ohio, May 10, IflOfl. 

Los Anffclos, Cnlif., AUK- 27, 1900, 

Washington, D.C., Kept. IDflG 
(exact date not yet dutar mined). 

Names and mailiiif.; uddruNKOH oP in- 
dividuals from industry ami research 
oiganizntions desirinp; to attend tho 
various regional meetings should bo 
furnished to; 

?2'' R S5 oar di and Tochnoloffy Div. 
Attn: Mr. Ted Patterson (RTS) 
An- Force Systems Command 
Bpllmff An- Force Base 
Washington, D. C. 20882 

April 1966 



April '.'.; l'i up,-) |\ Ail m in i -ilia | i,,n 
An'.ll, Aiinit.il .Sriiifiuu. l|lrl \r\t 
VorKi-i, Ni'M \ MI It < ll> , 

,Mll> II: \niri it mi ! it-it 1 1 IP I r nl ( ln'til 

ii'ti I Km: in i- 1- 1 '> Mrrl \t\i". 4 'iilu in IIIIK 

OMti. 
Mnv ,i: Vmn ii'iin I )i ilmim v Af,-m, \n 

mutt Mrriiiii;. Wn IniiKhni Ililfmi 

Hoi. -I, \\ H'.ltiil)!'"!!. II, C. 

Mil) HI \',\: Vtlhuiul Ti-li-im let inn 
( 'iMilt'i i HI i', llii'iinti, \|nt, f,, 

Mil) II: \ntlMiut) \i-in-i|tiicf S.-i * |, fii 
An ''ii, \iniiitil Mi,-(hi|,-, NX ii'.liini'lHH, 
II.C. 

Ma> II n : V tm-i ii mi llrlli i,|ih-i Nil 
t'l.-ly ,MiTimn. Sin ml, ,11 I'mt, l!,,h-|, 



Mil) ltM!i: Nutiotml \.-t,.'jpu,'i' \\\v\-< 
liiiiil. I 'uiiiVi t-ii.'i'. \\t\\ dm, Dtilii 

Mm Hi i!0; \iiitiltnn Mm-n-li nl (nil 



I.' 



ilii'.liy" Syniiimilmii, Hirmiii(;ham, 
Alu. 

Mu\ .!! : Armnl l-'itrt'CH liny. 

<ii\ .11 Jinii' ','. : American .Surit-ly fur 

IJni.lity Cuntiul M.TliNK. NIMV York 

( ily. 

Inn,' '.'. \ : Am.'ilnin Sucii-ty fur !Mi-l- 
iil'i/l-.iisdi-i n Hrj;iniinl lv\liil>il iuii and 
( nnli'n-iH'c, ltd'. Inn, iMatis. 

Illlli. tl III; S.H-li-ly n| Alll l.llllll ivi- KlL 

ciiu-.'n, I'liuirniinti. Ih'lroit, MlHi, 
' it-Mi; Stti-ii'iy (if I'limlir liiilns 

IHt'^ CntMt-ullnii, Ni-w Vuili City. 
.I'm,- V !'; Ainu-, I |-'tiri'i'n C ijni- 



AliiV III '.!(!; .'iMiilln I It ({i-Ni-iiii ll llP.li 
Illlr "MvitilitiHit' I'liu'r-'SM':! [MI In 



Itini, Slu 'iiiimi ,1'nr-h Hiili-l, Wiiwli- 
in>;liMi, ll.l ', 

Inni' UM.'c Aim-iifiin Suricly fur Mr- 
fliiiMtviil I'lniiiiii-fiti Mi'i-lliij;, riiiln- 
tU'lpliin, ('ii, 

.In in- l'.i';;;i ; Asmn, nf Imlmiiriiil Ail- 
it'|||. t ., F1 .Mri-liiiK, Ni'ii Vnrli Cily. 

.In iif I'l ;M; ('(iniuimiiciiiiuM \Vnrk n-H 
"I \nu-iirii Mi'viiiij:, Si. t.miiH, Mu. 

.litiii- .!( ',!:! : Anit'ilnui Nm-ltMi Sucli-ly 
Mi-dun:. IK-im-i, diln. 

Imii' ;!I ',M: Hutu 1'iui'i Illj; Muniinc- 

nii'Mi Af.. Mi'i-lliiH. ChlciiK", III, 



Operational Symposium 

Will Be Highlight 

of AHS Forum 

An 0|'nil.ioniil/MtuijYi i m(!iil. Mynt- 

Mnmi will ! , f )},,. M|;|ili,f|it;i 

liirinjv l,lii! Ami'i-inui llclin.pl.cr So- 
nHy Foniiit, May II Kt, at. Um Shorn- 
t"ii I'ni-h Ihih'l. WanliiiiKlnn, It.C. 

Tlic ;iy]ii|)n;iiiMii iliiKtn.-tMiuiDt dy iu- 
'liuilry mill niililary (.(llcinl.'i ' will 
rover l.npirii on tm'Lli'iil nttrli-vnl ul' 
iiirrnifl mid |ii'r;u>niii'l, luiiiinii fur- 
I'M':;, i-iijit i>I|Vclivi'll,'.'l:t lUld ('Miul)lll i't'- 
tVrUvi'iH'jiii in |in>niri'iiii'Ml. ilcciHinn.'t, 
V I'l M, mi | In- nidi in it ii,| ] miff ran i 
iimimKi'mi'u! ,-iiiii'i'pls iiiitinil.ry anil 
niililary |irnclu'ii. Its ulijcclivi* in 
In (irnviilc I'm' ujnlalini: iil.h'il,U'i','i uiiil 
an f\fli:iii|t,- nf iilnui iintl i'X|H'ricM(v 



r inr,ii'inalion . 

Mr. Kihviinl W. (luiihuni. Snllc Ililll). 
Ili'.Mi K Slivrl. NW, WllrililHKl'Ml, !).{!. 
l, (Aivu Ciitlr :!():!) 7IIV :\'M7. 



Army To Organiio 

Choporrcil/Vulcan 

Air Dofonso Battalions 



.(.- . ..I^.IMI.IV ,.( tt-,> M ,IA : 

lfjii, :l .',( ,),.,(!> i. : '!^, ^j'.is^ r.il 
v.-h- t J.v in.'itiilv! 

l-tl'M AllD), Hil it- f, i. li;i i:, pi,,-,,, 



Modification of 

C-l 23 Aircraft 

Initiated by AFLC 



-^ :,?!(. V'.t!!l ll'^V Wlll'i'lti HI), I 




f'.v,-niy airmift, 



^M'i! IMr-.-iy s.f tlu> iiint IrluiJili'-'l 
iais.if; ii ,li.,!u[i,| fur Nnvi'inlK-r 
ui fi,>h)j<!t Ij'iu t-f (Jut (ti''j,','t in t'x- 

a.-! !*y iMvi-iiiirt-i' ISM;'/, 

t ;isMitM (ht[< i f'*,i|',, t.f Ihwri!" 
i.vii, ,M>f.. him i''---iMf| iuiliiit Air 
-( t';sii>hiiK "f f;! t; inilliMii fur Hi,- 
,<j.r;\ llic i .'iiii';n-| \v(it) n\viir,|,'il by 
" Uiunt-i IlHbiini Air Mud-rii'l 
-;!, tv'Uii''* AFH, *i(t,, !>yMftu ;>ii| 
'lH hutn^^rr f>r On- (' I'^l, 



Marino Corps 

Activating Now Division 

at Camp Ponclloton 

Tin- I', ,'i, Mnrini' Cnrjui lirjifan nr- 
liviittiin nf u in '\v iliviiiinn Mnrch I, 
\v(iii tli,' I'orniiiliiiM cif (he llnil ri'iii- 
""'"la! unil nf Hi.- m-w K\>t\\\t at 
I'linip IVmll.-ti.n, CaliC, 'i'lu- new tlivi 
itMii. tliviicniili-d tin- Kiflli. lirinjjn (he 
Miii-iii.' <'nr|i.-i i.|i'.-iij;|li up In I'tiiir 



.iiniliiiji: Tnim ;!(i, nm 
.-ij.iiiur "f th,< ;:iith Mariin- lii-iviini'iil, 
ami mipimrliMK rli'ini'lll;i h wuri lilt- 
lir.'it unit nf UK- m-\v ilivittinii In lie- 
I'Miitr lu-iivi-. 'fwn HIMIT r,'iri"H'nl:i, tin- 
'.'.VI Ii Mini J!H|||, will lin I'm-iilr'il liffiirt' 
111,' t'liil uf Ihr yrar, An iirlilli'ry n-K- 
ini-'iil. <lr:ii|;iiali-il Ihc l-'llli Mni'Incd, 
Will uhn, U' u,li|r,l. 

'I'll,- ilivi.'iiiui in t'xjMvlnl tu ln< fully 
ninniinl within a year, llrail'iiiarlorti 
.-tti'l majur |inrtlnit!i of tlm tlivitijnti 
will lit- liinU.-it iU, Citinp 1'cnilli'ion, 
(ini- liiilUilinn lutnliiiiv l<-niii, jiliiH tivl- 

lllinn t'liMlli'.lll.'l. will III' IlilMl'll Ul. Ivil- 

m-nh<> Hjil 



Sim-r' tin- at'Uvatitin of the 
in M-lii'tlnli'iJ in incn-mi-nlii, liuinc lm(.- 
luli'in IntnliiiK Icanui will n-iu'li full 
ip'-nilitinal rt':nliin ( 9!i liy thr time Un> 
i-nUt-i' <livininn i-i fi 



Indunlry HutUHn 



23 



NOTES FOR EDITORS 



Briefed below are some 
events and projects within the 
Department of Defense which 
may be of interest to writers 
and editors. If further Informa- 
tion on any of these topics is 
desired, please write to Chief. 
Magazine and Book Branch, Of- 
fice of Assistant Secretary of 
Defense (Public Affairs), 
Washington, D.C., 20301. 



"MAN AMPLIFIER" 

TO AUGMENT HUMAN 

STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE 

The U.S. Navy is developing a 
unique exoskelton suit which can be 
worn like an outer garment to aug- 
ment a person's ability to lift and 
move heavy objects. 

The suit, which contains its own 
power supply, is a .jointed, load bear- 
ing framework which enables the 

n^T 1 ,' t0 K -P-f form tasks beyond his 
normal ability or which would de- 
mand prolonged exertion. 

n n)* *! id ?f the ex skelton suit, 
a man wiil be able to lift as much as 
l,oOO pounds to a height of six feet 
and be able to carry the load at least 
^o feet in about 10 seconds. 

the 3*? 'i i i ntS #" be include(! in 
the in t to allow the wearer to walk 

bend, turn, lift, climb, push and pi 

I \ T -l, he Bioves " of th * suit 

m t/ ( fr lb i e , Cn , 1 ugh to vemlt the 
man to climb ladders, grip handles 

and ropes and handle objects of f! 
ferent sizes and shapes. 



Planned to permit its ISG in deep 
jajvage and search-and-rScue P 



ARMED FORCES DAY TO BE 
OBSERVED MAY 21 

The seventeenth annual Armed 
Forces Day will be observed May 21 
as the nation pauses to honor the men 
of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Ma- 
rine Corps and Coast Guard. 

Because of the significance of the. 
holiday and since so many people HIT 
connected, either directly or indirect- 
ly (through active duty, the reserves 
or defense industry) with the A lined 
Cervices, many editors may be inter- 
ested in obtaining information to com- 
memorate this day in their publica- 
tions, 

When requesting information and 
photographs from the Magazine and 
Book Branch for your Armed Forces 
Uay layout, please outline your needs 
as specifically as possible so that re- 
quests can be filled promptly ami 
accurately. ' 



ARMY DEVELOPS 

COMPUTERIZED MECHANIC 

FOR WHEELED VEHICLES 

This U.S. Army Im.s developed 
new autonmtic dmu'iioNlJc uvHlein 
called "ItoadymaiilH" which IH nipulili. 
til' ddterminiritf Urn CJIIIH<> (l f mall'iinc- 
tions of curtain lypcH of wheeled vc- 
hid OH in less than five minulr.i, 

Trnnspoi-talik' in a jcq,, Hiu nuu- 
liuterixiMl "ni(!lutnii>" deh-cU tin. 
fault, typcH out in Kiiglijih u iU' f in-ip- 
timi of tin- CIIUHO, (hen lisils tin- parlH 
miuncd | )y iiutnlifi- iind ntmilr IIIIIM- 
uiil rclenuin 1 



ntur(cd b v 



/Hie 

giving the. t'ompiitor 
lion such UK vithUih. |, y|ll . ,! |1|irlll(l 
Honal numlK-r. If tlui imput inclndeH 
niismatclK-d infnrinatlon, tin; diila in 
iiitui-nml for fiomwllnn. Tho typed 
data Hoi'v n |H!i-inannnt I OK for 




April 196A 




Contracts of $1,000,000 and over 

awarded during the month 

of March 1966: 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

3Americnn F!nlnhlng Co., Memphis TOM,, 
S4.072.fimj. 4240,000 yar <ls of cotton d',"k 
cloth McmnhlB I^fonm- IWHonnd Sup- 
port Cenlor, Philadelphia. 
J. ]', StevciiH & Co., New York Citv 
*1.1I1.B0. 1 m.H72 yards of cotton duck- 
doth. New York City. Datanm Poraonno! 
Hujiurt Con tor. Ph!lailo]].]iin <-'snnei 

~S2Tu22fi V "??l 1 R fr! 111 "' , ""I 11 """- ' Mil. 
$2.460,228 J,llMf>3 ym-ilo n f cott , m ,i l]ek 

cloth. Baltimore. Defense Pei-minne! Sun- 
].ort Center, Philadelphia. 

"Wnn'n '"""i N< lr W Ynrk Cily - S3.aC7.343. 
,7X0.00) yards of cotton duck cloth. Now 
York Uty, Dcfeimc Pcrminiict Snnmii-t 
Center. Philadelphia. *>w]>pnrt 

B. G. Cnltmi, Division of Unylon Fabric*., 
Now York City. 11,300,000. 1012713 
yards of cotton duck cloth. Now York 
Tiufl 1 " c {. nac I'w-HimiKj] Support Cental-. 
Philadelphia. 

~~ r n nni i c y nlc Co " Ncw Y<l1 ' lt Hy. $2,000... 

470, 2.300,002 ynnlR of cotton duck cloth. 

Ncw York City. Dofomie Personnel Sup- 

port Center, Phil tide! nhln. 
West Polnt-Poppcrcll, Inc., New York 

City. 1.1,730.732. ,1.465,108 ynr<la of coUo 

(luck doth. New York City. Defonso Por- 

Boniiel Sitpjiort Center, Philadelphia. 
4 Ihe Defense Fuel Simply Center. Alex- 

andria, Va. in awnrdlnft the following con- 

tracts for JI'-R jot fuel! 
Humble OH & Refining Co.. Houston, 
'lex. $10.Q07,r>pO. 116,000,000 m ] a . 
Socony Mobil Oil Co., Now Yiu-k Cltv 
50,81)0,007. 73.104,240 gala. Y< 

nHsn ,, 00 '! Pllll "<<' !>"' 80,801,012. 
00,480,000 gala, 

Union Oil Company of California, Los 



. 

HCNB Oil & Chemical Corp., Perth Am- 

boy N.J. $1,810,640, 18.346.000 gnlH. 
iMlKlngton Oil Ilcflnerica, Inc., I.onir 
Donah. Calif $1.324,440. 11,700,000 gals. 



Conalnl Slntes Petrochemical Co., 

HoiiBlon, Tex, $3,889,118. 20.247,000 

(tnls. 

fltloii Service Oil Co., Ncw York City. 

$1,840.860. 20,000,000 enla. 

" I Co " Palnllno, 111. $1,640.800. 



ni'fi P?'*" 80 1'crnonnel Support Center, 
Pnllndcliililn, IB nwnvdlnit the followlnR 
contrnctB for tropical comlmt hootH ! 



. 

I'll'nnnn 1 ' * , Co " lic l c rnp, Md. $1.801.200, 
100,000 pairs. 

i l ~Br*T I "flr n l ' ffl ?}l! rMrt WiwnoavUlo. N.C. 
$1.867,360. 14C.OOO pnlrB. 

ft; Co " "lolnli, Man H . 
^O.H'l iwlra. 

C S" Now O" 1 '""""' I.9,- 
, gallons of lubrlcntiiiB oil. 
Dofenae Fuel Supply Center, Alexandria, 



o " ^ cw York c "-y- 1-202,- 
| yn , f , da of PolVMtflp cotton 
h. Now York City. DcfenHo Pcr- 
Bonnol Support Center, Phlladolphln. 

MwXwr* ffjP" * Tub Cl> - D n'n. P'. 
wd 8B 'T? B> i 48 ?l 168 colta r concertina 
T H n ^ nilt( k , Do f OII o Construction Sup- 
ply Center, Columbus, Ohio. 
-Nor Ihwwtern Steel & Wire Co.. Mount 

fElifc IU< i J1 'S, 30 - 818 - >0,902 colla of 
concertinB wire. Mount Sterling. Defense 

Ohio l0 " Bupply Cc ' Uer ' Col mblia . 
Agrl-Tec Steel Corp., Johnstown, Ohio. 



""Sr-S?"* 82 "^ ^o"3SS.'fe2 

SLiSasr *'""""" *"* #". 



,. 

Kcrr-McGee Corp., Oklnhomn City, 
OhlB jl.689.82G. 10,545,000 gab. 
l 1 , 11 '""^ Oil Co.. Ya zoo City. Mlw. 
51,014,166. 16,090,000 gala 



324 



oodbi.rv 
" 



-HVM Bros New York City. 



, 

Colonial Cnrp. of America, 
Twin. |l,fl6B.219. 8GG,248 



. 
Hie Defense Fuel Supply Center Alex- 

, l n ', V ?- hn9 ,l*<i the followinB 
contrncta for urn tie JP-4 j e t fuel- K 

Standard Oil Co. of Calif,, San Fran- 
Cisco S2.U24.83G. 236,717 284 sals 

" 



HoU8ton ' 



Continental Oil Co., Houston 
fll.U82 133.28S.OOO wla. ' 
Silica bcrvlcc Oil Co.. Ncw Ynrlt 

S10.340.G43. 120,750,000 gnh 

mJnn nnn " ^ Yorh C ' ty ' 
na, 400,000 gala. 

Shnmrock Oil & G n9 Corp., Amorillo 
Tex. $0,482.600, 04.000,000 sal* 
Conalal States Petrochemical Co . 
Houslon, TCK. 34,875,017. 53,227,000 

UoiiBlns OH Co. of Cnllf., I.os Ancelca 

14,820.800. -10,600,00 eala. * n 8IM - 

Slnclnir Itefininjr Co., New York Cltv 
KC77.014. r,0,880,000 gala y ' 

S'tt""! Oil ft Gas Co., Ilonitan. Tex. 
$4,061,100. 48,000,000 eals. 
?t!i l K r(J " Cn - Clevclnntl, Ohio. 
63,000,000. 40,000,000 gals 
MncMlllnn Klnir-Frec Oil Co., Loa 
n .? e i^- n * 3 .920,730. 40,000.000 gnla. 



Tcnn ' 



AnffeIC8 ' 



Tulsa, Okla. 

IMillllns Petroleum Co., ' Bnrtlcsvlllc. 

Okla. ?3,6QO,CG7. 41,680,000 gala. 

American Petrofina Co. of Tox., Dallas. 

Tex. 13,420,340. 37,600.000 gals. 

Chevron Oil Co., HI Pnso, Tox. $3,236,- 

200, 34,000,000 gals. 

Sunray DX Oil Co., Tulsa, Okln. $2,870 - 

100. 33,015,000 gala. 

Howoll Refining Co., San Antonio, Tex. 

$2,581,923. 27.340.000 gals. 

Leonard Refineries, Inc., Alma. Mich. 

$2,302.600. 24,500.000 gala. 

Northwcatern Refining Co., St, Paul 

Park, Minn. 53,244,012, 23,105,000 gala. 

Irlangle Refineries, Houston, Tex. 

82,070,440. 22,000,000 gala. 

Sioux Oil Co,, Newcastle, Wyo. 

31,070,070. 17,100.000 gala. 

TcHoro Petroleum Corp., Carrizo Springs. 

Tex. $1,076,840. 18,500,000 gala. 

Champlln Petroleum Co., Port Worth, 

Tox. $1,912,200. 20,500,000 gala. 

Tidewater Oil Co., Loa Angelea. 31,908,- 

900. 18,000,000 gala. 

Hercules Oil Co,, San DIeffo, Cnllf. 

31,880,000. 17,855,000 gals. 

Golden Engle Refining Co., LOB Angeles. 

$1,770.400. 18,000,000. 



Fletcher Oil Co., Wilmington, Calif 

51,030,340. 10,600,000 gala, 

Socony Mobil Oil Co., New York Citv 

516,647,818. 173.415.000 B ala 

^'''TA.S'L* Re(lnin Co., Ashland. 
Ky. 87,522,851. 77,187,000 gals. 
IJebco Corp.. Abilene, Tex. (2V S6.480 . 
G02. 07627,000 B nlu. 81.780.698. 17,203- 
000 eftla. 

Cryatnl Flash Petroleum Corp., Indian- 
apolis, Ind. ?2,138,1M. 20,010,000 gnla. 
Monarch Refining Co., San Antonio. 
Tex. $1.147,130. 11,850,000 gala. 
II Orthopedic Equipment Co., Bourbon. Ind 
32,386,120. 187,000 folding canvaa cots. 
Bourbon. Defense General Supply Center, 
Richmond, Vn. 

Sidran Sportawenr, Inc., Dallas, Tex. SI - 
226,600, 30,000 men'a wool gabardine 
overcoats. Dnllns. Defense Personnel Sun- 
port Center, Philadelphia, 

H Borg-Wnrncr Corp., Chicago. 32,512,000. 
762,880 steel helmets. Chicago. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philndclphin. 
16 Enatman Kodak Co., Rochester NY SI - 
072,954 7,300 rolls of aerial photographic 
Illm. Rocheatcr. Defense General Supply 
Center, Richmond, Va. 

Cavalier Bag Co., Lumherton, N.C. $1,. 
706,000. Sand bags. Lumbcrton. Defense 
General Supply Center, Richmond, Vn. 
Standard Oil Co. of Cnlif., San Francisco. 
81,901,033. 082.000 gallons of automotive 
gaaolinc and 16,902,000 gallona of grade 
DF-A arctic fuel oil. Defense Fuel Supply 
Center, Alexandria, Vn. 

Tanenbnum Textile Co., New York City. 
$2,440,200. 0,000,000 yards of nylon net- 
ting cloth. New York City. Defense Per- 
sonnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
Putnam Mills, Corp., New York City. 81,. 
108,000. 3,821,000 yards of nylon netting 
cloth. New York City. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 
10 Habag Corp., New York City. $1.807,501. 
12,040.000 pounds of 22-gnuge steel sheets. 
New York City. Defense Industrial Supply 
Center, Philadelphia. 

17 The Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alex- 
andrin. Vn., IB awarding the following con- 
tracts for dleacl and fuel oil: 
Standard OH Co. of Calif., San Fran- 
cisco. $2,108,000. 1,260,000 barrels of 
No. fuel oil. 

Texaco, Inc., New York City. $1,299,. 
000. 700,000 btirrels of No, 6 fuel oil. 
Gulf Oil Corp., Houston, Tex. 31,775,- 
189. 300,000 barrels of dleael fuel and 
300,000 barrels of No. fuel oil. 
Socony Mobil Oil Co., New York City. 
$1,876,866. 374,000 barrels of dieael fuel 
and 970,000 bnvrela of. No. fuel oil 
Metropolitan Petroleum Co,, New York 
City. 81,053,800. 100,000 barrela of No, 
ft fuel oil and 310,000 barrels of Navy 
Special. 

18 Brownwood Mfg. Co., Brown wood, Tex 
$2,683,200. 200,000 men's lightweight rain- 
coats. Brownwood, Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 
21 Rubber Fabricators, Inc., Grantaville W 
Va, 81,897,600. 260,000 pneumatic mat- 
tresses, Grantaville. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 

~~?, n ,"; Products, J nc,. Entontown, N.J. 
51,148,681. 107,848 men's wet-wtather 
parkas. Eatontown. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Phllndephia. 
23 LaCrOBse Garment Mfr. Co., LaCrosse 
Wis, ?3,002,468. 860,864 tent 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



25 



halves. LaCrosse. Defense Personnel Sup- 
cort Center, Philadelphia. 






Support Center, Philadelphia. 
d T P Stevens & Co., New York City. SK. 
145 00 I 500,000 ynrds of wool B er e clo h. 
New York City. Defense Personnel Sun- 



Madison. Defense Personnel 
ter, Philadelphia. 







S^ppoA "enter, Philadelphia. 

Stone Mfg. Co., Columbia, S.C. 5M. 
80L 2.B3&84 Vl of men's cotton short.. 
Columbia. Defense Personnel Support Cen- 
ter. Philadelphia. . ,, 

-Nante* Riviera Corp., New York City. SI. 
380,666. 3,218,432 pairs of men a coiio, 
shorts. New York City De ense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 

ARMY 

l-Unlvcrsity of Mfchlwn. Ann Arbor. Mich. 
91 DUB 292 Research work. Hawaii anu 
Ann 'Arbor. Defense Supply Service, 

_ffi B vlCoS;S- U ter.. inc., Albuaucraue. 
NM 34 547 000. Work on the Albuquer- 
one N!M. diversion channel project. Albii- 
nuoraue. Engineer Dbt., Albuquerque. 

-EIW MeCullmiBh. Inc., San Carlos. Calif, 
$1.143,650. Klystron electron tubes. San 
Carlos. Army Electronics Command, Fort 
Monmouth, N.J. v . . t 

-Union Carbide Corp.. New York City. 
S6.106.2I3. Component3 for radio seta. 
Chemway, N.C. Army Electronics Com- 
mand. Fort Monmouth, N.J. 

-M. Slelnthal & Co.. New York City. Sl- 
268 187. Personnel reserve parachutes. 
Roxboro. N.C. Army Aviation Materiel 
Command. St. Louis. . 

Martin Mai ettn, Orlando, Fla. $2,000,000. 
Components for ordnance Items. Orlando, 
Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 

Sperry Hand Corp., Salt Lake City, Utah 
si 988.010. Inspection equipment and 
Sment subsystems (MB) for helleop. 
ters. Salt Lake City. Army Weapons 
Command, Rock Island 111. 

Kaiser J*P Corp,, Toledo, Ohio, fsjjjia,- 

OS6. Utility trucks. Toledo. Army Tank 
Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 

-Aerojet General, Downey, Calif, .607.- 
953. Ordnance Items. Downey. Ammuni. 
tlon Procurement & Supply Agency, Jollet, 

-Scovlll MfB. Co., Waterbury, Conn. $L- 
434.312. Ordnance Items. Waterbury. Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Jollet, 111. ... T . ,. e ,n 

Whirlpool Corp., Evanavllle. Ind, $1,870,- 
844 106mm projectile parts. Evansvlllo. 
Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 

FMC Corp., San Jose, Calif. $1,976,120. 
Metal parts (or lOflmm projectiles. San 
Jose. Plcatlnny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 

Northrop Corp., Anaheim, Calif. J2.084,- 
081. 106mm projectile components. Ana- 
helm. Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 

-Honeywell, Inc., Hopkins, Minn. $3,007,- 
096. Metal parts for grenade assemblies. 
New Brighton, Minn. Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, Jollet, 111. 
-Gar-Lat Mfg. Co., Philadelphia. $1,670,- 
800, Cable assemblies. Old Forge, Pa. 
Army Electronics Command, Philadelphia. 

2 Hyde Construction Co., Jackson, Miss. $2,- 
920.BB7, Work on the Okatlbee Reservoir. 
Meridian, Miss, Ensineer Dlst., Mobile, 
Ala, 

SCH Corp., Deerfleld, 111. $1,396,030. 
Teletypewriter sets with ancillary Items. 
Deerfleld. Army Electronics Command, 
Philadelphia. 




Savannah, Ga. r-..,, n s\ 200 - 

-S't.S ; ' f 

fesMSsS&i 
<-SS 

^nTrmTCnn^ 
I^Tsuff^ConBtructloii Co., Afton, Mo. 
once, Mo?ErilST<ir n DlBt!, P' 13 ^^^ 



S.C.; Harboi- and Shipyard River Project. 
Riiirlnper Dist., Chftrleston, b.i;. 
PrSte Co Division of Kltra Corp., 

? :as' Ohio. w,2.55o. c .2-7 1 ^ 



Philadelphia. ga ,, 

fl-FMC Corp., Charleston, W. Vn. SH.100.- 
000 M11BA1 vehicle spare parts. ChnrleH- 
ton. Northwest Procurement Aaonny, 
Oakland. Calif. 

Fllnclibnush Products, Heel Lion, 1 n. 0-V 
653. Metal parts for OOmtn l-rn- 
jectiles. Red Lion, Ammun lion 1'rocurc- 
mont & Supply Agency. , Jollet, II ' 
ID-Gallon Amco, Gallon, Ohio, S1.418.WO. 
Metnl parts for iletonnt nj[ tmw. l.allon. 
Frankford Ai-sennl, Philadelphia. 
ZD Products, Division of Wells Mnrlnc, 
Inc. El Sofumlo, Calif. 82,213.000. Pro- 
duction of metal pnrts for delonntinif 
fusses, El Sesundo. Fvnnkford Ai'Hnnni, 
Philadelphia, 

Itcrmite Powder Co., Saimiis, Calif, (>,- 
230,320. DetonntiiiB funoH. SausuH. I' I'linK- 
ford Arsenal, Philndclphiii. 
Norfolk Dredging Co., Norfolk, Vn, SI,- 
850,660. Work on Norfolk Hnrbov Uinnnol 
Project. Engineer Dlst., Norfolk. Vn. 
American Fnlirication Prailuctn Co.. Iiull- 
nnapollB. Ind, $8,048,150. Morlnr shell iln 
assemblies. Indianapolis. Army Procure- 
ment Dctnchment, Chicago. 
Cone Bros. Construction Co., Tampn, Hit. 
82,943,512, Work on tlie Cross Horldn 
Bnrse Cannl Project, Piitnnm ,1x11111 ty, 
Ploridu. Engineer Dist., Jacksonville, Mil. 
11 Ineraham Co., Bristol. Conn. S2,HO.IHO. 
Metal parts for artillery fu/cH, Ilrwtol. 
Ammunition Procurement & Suimly 
Agency, Joliet, III. 

14 PMC Corp., San Jose, Cnllf. SL15U3R. 
Advance production enRlnoerlnB for HAWK. 
launchers. San Jose, Army Tank Auto- 
motive Center, Warren, Mich. 
Magnnvox Co., Torrnnee, Cnltf. 82.300,- 
000. Radio communications sub-system 
and ancillary Items. Torrnncc. Army 
Electronics Commnnd, Fort Monmouth. 
N.J. 

T, C. Young Construction Co., WllllnniB- 
burg, Ky. $1,860,045, Work on the Gray- 
son lleservolr Project. Grnyson, Ky. Engi- 
neer Dial., HuntinRton, W. Vn. 
Wiley & Jackson Co., Ronnoke, Vn, $7,- 
968,385. Work on the Cross Florida Barge 
Cnnnl Project. Mnrion County, Fin. Engi- 
neer Dist, Jnckaonvllle, Fla. 
Harvey Aluminum, Inc., Torrnnce, Cnllf, 
$1,976,000. 20mm projectiles. Torrnnce, 
Frankford Arsenal, Pbiladelphla. 



Maxson Electronics Corp., Great River 
N.Y. $1.3.10,423. 20mm projectiles, Maeon 
On. Frankford Arsennl, Philadelphid. 
iTi Hnrrlfl & Brnok, Htvcrdnlc. Md. $1,181. 
105. Work mi the Hannibnl Lock & Dem >> 
Ohio River, Project. Engineer Dist., Pitta- '' 
hiii-Kh, Pn- 

Knytlienn Co., LcxliiBton, Mass, $1,872,138. 
KiiKlneuriiiK Hcrvlccs for the self-propelled 
HAWK sywlom. Andover and Bedford, 
Mims. Army Mobility Command, Hunts, 
vlllc, Ala. 

-Hnythcoii f.a,, Lexington, Mnss. $4,507,. 
UOO. Dcalttn and ilevclii|>mcnt of the 
HAWK ATHM/1II1* I Anti-Tactical Bal- 
listio Missilu/llnwk Improvement Program) 
iniHHili! nyslom. Andover and llcdford. 
MIIKS. Army Mobility Commnnd, Hunts- 
villu, Aln, 

AVCO Corp., Stratford. Conn. 32,589,000. 
I'rodiid liniirovument Horvices for calendar 
your 1!0 for 'l'-53 eiu;incH for UH-1 hell- 
i-ojitorbt. Hlrntford. Army Aviutinn Com- 
mlind. Ht. LOU!H. 

AVCO Corp., Stratford, Conn. $2,838,843, 
i'rodui'l improvement services for ciilendar 
yunr H'Oli fur T-fifi cnBlnes for CH-47 
iwtlinoi'ltsi'a. Ht rat ford. Army Aviation 
C.ummiind, St, I.ouin, _ 

Hell Helicopter Co.. Division (if Hell Aero- 
sniico Cofl)., I-'di'l Worth, Tex. S2.6fll.761, 
TrnnrtiiiiHrtiitiiH for UH-1 hcllcoptera. Fort 
Worth. Army AvInUon Materlnl Com- 

Cndill'nc (InKO Co., Wiirron, Mich. S1.67S,- 
000. Armoruil fiiii'H. Wnri'un. Army Tnnk 
Autiimittlvu (!(di tor i Wnrrun, Mich. 
jG Microwave AHHorlntcs, Inc., IlurllnRton, 
MIIHH. ifl.lfi'l.-lfiU. I'jlccti'on tubes for AN/ 
1'SH 1 rnilnr Hot". HiirliiiBton. Army Elec- 

AVCO* Corp 1 .'.' Stn'itforil, Conn, $6.480,000. 
Aircraft oiurini'ii for the CH-47 nircraft, 
SU'iilford. Army Aviation Mntcricl Com- 
mand, Ht. Lmiin. 

General IlynnmlcH, HocheHter, N.Y, $13,- 
58.1 ilO'i, Undid sets nnd mountings. 
Itdi'lioHlcr. Army Electronics Command, 
Phllriilcliihia. 

n Flmor (1. Wcnilt, Inc., Hncrnmento, Cnllf, 

SI iHU G3fi. Work on tho San Jimcinin River 
i-'looil Control Project. Mnnlcca. Calif. 
KiiKincer Dint., Hac.nimcnto, Cnlif. 
Fonl Motors, Donrliorn, Mich. 53,986.764, 
'/,-l.m Lruclts, Withlnm! I'nrk, Mich, Army 
Mobility Command, Wnrrcn. Mich. 
Hell lUlleopter Co., Fort Worth, Tex, IS.- 
:i(IO 000. I'voeurimionl of Ult-iu. neii- 
c(lit<M'n. Ihinil.. Tex. Army Aviation Com- 
ninnd, St. LouiM. 

IB AVCO Corp., Hlnitfnnt, Conn. ?l.HH,696. 
NiiKMli- nnd cylinder minombHoH for UII-1 
lu'liropti'i'ii, Hlrntfoi'd. Army Avintlon 
Mfttrll llommrind, fit. Louis. 
.-.-Cliancy & James Oormtrucllon Co.. Rich, 
ariltmii '1'cs. $1, nor,, it Oil. Work on thi 
Fimlor' ItiiiiiM'volr, Onwin, Project. Swcel 
Homo, Oro. Knlncor Dlt,, P"rtlaml, Ore 
Lear Hlcitlcr, Inc., Annlmim, Calif. W,< 
IIU) (100. ProduutliiTi of chiHHllled electron 
fiiu1l>mi!iit. Aniihoim. Army _ Electronic) 
Coininaiiil, Furl Monmouth, N.J. 

21 (llmney A .Inmea & >hriiltiii; ConatrneHn 

Co., lllalinrilHftii. Tux. $2,073, 01. Con 
Hlniflllmi of n vncutim lelcscope Inljorntory 
ancrnmcnto Tenk, N.M. Engineer Dlst, 
Alliiniuui'iiuo, N.M. 
-Hiicrry-Utnli Co., Hpcrry-Rnnd Corp., 
K Oily, Utnli. W.OIH.610. Rnr 
I'lmne 11 Id'omid clcclronlcB r-.-- s 
development uriwrnm. Snlt Lnke U 
Army MiHHllo Commnnd, HunlBvlllo, AU 
22-~(ioncrnl Klcrtrle, Went Lynn, Mass, SW 
000. I'i'oihinllini (if eiifflnoH to B"!"',''; 
Ailviincml Aorlnl Fl 1 ; ,. 8 "^';,,,/ r ; 011 
Wont Lynn. Army Avintlon Material W 
ninnd, HI. Louis, , nni 

-AVCO Con.., Strntford, Conn. $.8M|OJ 
I'rodn.tlon of licHooptor en Inoa. Bt 
ford. Army Avintlon Mntorlnl Commnn 

St, LolllH. , , -, M , no 

~B. M. Well, Co., Qimimh, Tex. Jl.eHJJ 
ConvwHlon of Imll.llnK fwllltle n t R oWi 
APH. n. EiiKlneer Dint.. Snv. ntu h, J" 

^Ai-iiBlmot Procctm Co., New Hedford, Mnt 
SMQ0.82H. Production of Navy Protect 
muHkH. New Bedford. Ed B ewooil Araeni 

23 Western Cnntrnctlrifr Corp., Slotij : Oil 
IOWEI. S17,117,R30. Work on the StocKt 
McKorvoIr Project. Stockton, Mo, *' 
ncer Dint., KnnHna City, Mo. 

-Lockheed AlrcrnH, Wurbmk, Cftlif. 1 ' 
700,000. EiiBlneorlnR development oi i 
Advnnccd Aorlnl I'lro Sunport W" 
Loa Angeles, Venturn and 



April I9i 



. 
n,',v.'ii,'.v. Ammunition l'i,.,-iiM-ni'-iil .V . 



,.. olilo, :.;v.",','.i:iu. Am,', .V,. 

, I, .,'. ln.Mril,'.. K""'l ''" Vlni'.'iiM-', 

tlaUaml, ('..llf. ! I*'"' '"";' ""' 
A., v Tiil.l, Aiit.'ini'llv.- \ ml.-, . \\a,,.-,,. 



n i< ....... ' ...... "'""" ''";' rhl "'" lll "' 1 



,i t 

.,.,11 r.iinliio-H.iit of " itul.f.'.l nil 



If ini'litl" ....... ..... >><>' ' ..... ."'li...., 

... .,,||ll>- -.Illl.-lHI. > l,rMf,l,.'1U.V AlMl-, 

[),,,,,. rhimil"-i"1im,-. I'". Km-lifri HI. I , 




r-.-lumU,,, Ml," AMOV AvUHn., 

Mi ..... !) <"" ....... ' : ' ( l '"." 1 ", ... , ., 

ll,,,.lnn f.... M.I.I ..... I'" "' '".''' M '" l) 

l.aMi'M of f ...... 'H -'.'A l'""<; ..... "''"",:' 

..... ,...1 mi.l aim... .-I ...tiiii-i ...... * M''' 1 " 

AM ,,S Avh.ll'.n M'H-il-1 ' ""> ........ I '' 




........ li, N..1 

!K II, H. 1-ViH,,. ..... ''M.'l ..... I, "111" ''";' 

;; f ..... ,nii,H,,.i ..f c '' "!' '' l.K" ' '"> 

,.l..,.l ..< <>>" H..t,i..,, Aims A ......... "i'"> 

F ...... , Klni.-.ii.,-i'. Tn.i. l.m-lnr". Ml." . 

M.,l.il<<. Ala 

M,,m.w C ...... I. ....... I I""' I '"n>i',.' 

in.-. (I. .'". ...... '"""< ..... ,'"" : ' lf " . ' ll ' 1 ' 

(, I hi II.II.I.IH,.,, I'"' !.,! ..... '. HIM , 

Wi.ll'. SVnlh.. \V.."li , , , . 

Mnrlln Mm I- ..... lhlnn.1.., I I" , ' ' '" ,''', "l 

;;,,,, H,. ; , iin.l .''^"" i.-u.iltu: <" < > " ' 

v!l, ..... ...... f ML- illMM.U.AiJN "">' '"'" 

mt""ii.- "*" "'i ..... ; A "" 1 M '" : '"'* 

l-,,m,nn>i,|. Iliniinvlll.-, .\li. 

-HI I'ulllltt. lUtlll.l I'", Kl.-1mi.l=-..l>, Tra M.. 
Mf,;, ,m,t UVili m, III.- I'M. II" ;i.-l,-i I ..lit 



|M-'i> i - ' " - . , _ 

;,<, A, Trl.lic.l A H..H-. I'"'.. l.v.,,i,l,d, ( ' "tir 
<r in,; in,' W.oU ..ti Mi.- HUD .i..-.- i I" ' 

CiH of lli.l'i"'!',, I'nUf. t'-'.t in.-.'i I'l.s! . 

!iHi A Vv!"*.ni, n ui...-. " a "- l! ;; l i" 11 ' 

(, HUM I'nH.'M fll.-l !I'V -.'-I'll Urtll''!-- "" ll " 

,,'ali jmil's Mll.Miiil'ff Aim-. T.nit' AI.IM 

Itif I', nl.-l, V.-MM- i), Ml- l> 

;i| Mnth Trin li", I". . .\H--ni'.,'. i,. In "''"' 

Au'l.'.it.'-Uv., I'.'l.!,'.. \V .111.-,.. '' 1(l11 

I'ltd'H'lHn* l''' tr ''" . t'< ' >". ln " ' 



,, ,.. 

All(..in..!l',.. ',i,t,t, V, ntntt. .'.t 

InltHlM ..... nl 'I'clri.l.u.ir A, 

' 



Mint.. C,,ri... IM<,.=.-. Wft-.ii 3 '. 
V.',.i|., .,n Us.- -1. '-.' ti.vj 1 ., l '.-'-- 

' 



Aulu Mmtt W 

SI i...;.V ." 



l..i.>, I,,, eliti ,'H 

ImllntiHi'-i.Sla A MI, 

CHIH-I-. Wntfcir. Ml--) 



lin: urrvln-i 1,11 Mi,. Sll IM.KLAKII inh>^l<> 
MVi.li'hi. Ni'Wimrl Hciirli. Siiiillnvi'iil Ti'ii- 

, -IHTIMl.nl A|;i'1I...V, I'lltltllll'MIl, ( ',11 1 If. 

I'lill.i. CIH-II., N.-wpMci Xfiu-li, Calif. $L, 
:ui','.ni)ii. I uli In I >.i|iiiiMi),-iii inn Inl i-niiiM'i' 
f.M IK.- , L ;il]],],KI,A(;ll i.ilu-illr iivntrni. 
Nfw |i,ivt 11,'iu'li. Army Mldiilli- lliiiiniiuiiil, 
lliininvUI.-, Ah. 




NAVY 



Allmill, llf!ii-mi li I'IH-II., Ali-s n ntlr In. Vu. 

>', i ,::iit l vr.', n,.,'l,i'i HI..IMI:. f,., TKUIIIKH 
inl'iillr.'. <;M|I,I' ivitl.-. Vu Kmi'i.ii nf Navnl 
\Vrii| 'i, 

Pint....- S1.-.-I ran... r nn, 1'iillf. s: 1 .. 

ii'j.li'ii :it,',<i i tiuiim wlili iiiiiin-; I 

ii, i'i , L i 1,-',. I'.n ui, Nitvv I'lii'i'liiiulni: 

i i|tir>-, I ,,<, Aiii-f !."i, 

,\nlr<i|ilii i.li ii Hi'iii-i.ri-li Carii., l.n.i Anii.-li".. 

|.i F,|i.i>.iti Inn, I. ,-., A in;- 1 1-"', Nun',-, mnl 
1. it,'. 'im- Viillrv. I'allf, NIIVV I'lii.'lni'.lnn 
ll!|i,..<, I,,,'. AMI-.-I.-... 

Ail mil n I rn>.. Cltli'in:,., :H ,Tn 1 ,'^.!il. Ka.llii 
I., i . f.ti AIMIV itn.l Ni.\v li'iilnhni nirt-rafl, 
I'ltt, in-.., NMVV I'lii.'liiti.ini; UIIU'i-, Wnnli- 
li, )-t...i, H, r. 

i:..nw.> Imhinliii'... i;i 1'ilf, t'ntlf. ^l.:ii:t, 

m;, t'lin-lii.-i'iim; mnl tr.'lmli'al ficrvlri-i 

i.'lut.-.l l<> n.'iii ..V.I.-IMU j.r..l.v|-,, P.irl 

Min-nriit"-. I'nltf, Naw Pin i-Uii'iltii: llllli'i', 
I ,.:. Ani-.-li-, 




-.111 I 

I'nUfil Atnrnfl, I'n-.i Hinlf.ml. I',. on. 
SI. I. ,':',i ;i|iui . i-iir I n fin t-ni-tiifii i"i' 

\ ] 1 I ,\ llll.'H.d. I'lll .1 Mllllfl'Hl. NtlVV 

Ai'ii.Mx.. :iii|.|.h' OilU-.', l'l.llM,l,-l|-lilit, 

i;.-.li'l<ll HiliiiMlltfl. lii'MlMii, I'MIOI, ^lil." 

lhl..',.ll ,-( ,'intl>:i, 

I IHI.-.I All. infl, Mimi Uiiilfi.nl. ('mm, 

i, 1 i,i.iii.,iniii 'l !' ,10 ] .1 .-iiiilu.'ii. Mini 
IU.lf.i.,1 IhiK.ui .'f Navnl \V i-ii|. ..in., 
r..m:i.ll.lnlri1 Uli'ni-l I'.lr.'lili' ('..rii,, Mani- 

,'.->, i'i,,t,, i 'ni'i i ' .''.i^-iiNni, I'allf, Hint 
.'Hfti.ii. -i<i i 1 :: Mm in.- r.. ii>. 
Mniiini'"* '",. I m I \Vi.vm-. hnl. J-l. '-'('!, 
:. ;: ,'ii.ii.iMn..., i uml i.-lni.'.l i'.|Hii.iMf m. 

]..,! Wn, nf llni.-ini .if Ntivnl Wriii-.ni:., 
AMI'H Klrilrii, ''!" I'ln;,.. I'nllf, fl.HII, 

-i i ii,,|.,..',,-Mit-m (.. miiitiri i.t.-t I* ( 
it,,, jii,,, in,.,',. rJuMii lii.itl.'O, )i.niilni."'i 

I'i. , ll-n.^i ..( Vi,i,!- s ,-:. 1 1'. .. 

r.illnl Alt. mil, I ifl llmil.-i.l. I'-mii, '^1.- 
-J', .' ''. PnHi n'n il in i.'lil i-lll=lln'> l"l 
I ,'l ,,i>,l I .! u ill. l-'n-'l lliiilf'ii.l, 

IN", ''''i,!^!,- nti.'t in.' a. 'roil. II.' i f'-r '.'.;.'. 
i', !,,<,,.! < fi.!. i, M. ,'li.ntt' -.t.nir. Pti, 

i'"',!" r 7n >"i '"'>' 'w.'.V'-lf tin.l i'ln ti-.-ii'in- 
Ml, -. I,,i ,-..'!; In. li ....'lirvi, li.-iivi-f Ntivv 

{'i.|,iinl>m> MllitBt Mftf. I'",, t'nltiiiilni'i. 

nl.i.-. r- '>-' ',','<. N" -.-I'- lll "l lln M':'"-"I- 



i.iul Hi, n-;.-'tt1'.f" =- I'.l ..i*i" vy iK. 
I'-ifi ('"i.K. 'I t'l-nT.'t. M.'.'NIinl.-'sliiilil, I". 

ViciKii i;u.ui.-. iii.-,. rt.i.ini it. *'itiif- 

i, ; >,,) .',.. i'ii,-, i,-. L 1 , 1 ;:. iin'i) HiHi.'ir.. 

i- lS ' (t ,,i.,,',i,! :;av,' ::i.li.. I'lut'i * .'Hir.'l 

i\i,!. !. M, 'tit.Hh ,t.:iit:. I'M. , 

ri.ii.m f)pinini*-ltii 1'nrit.. Nulf'.iinl I." 1 -. 

t'-.Ilf SI, )-.'', ll|1( l. I'ntniiin-tl.ili i'f '''' 
, .... n i,,iiA.'tiMl.' fain:.' nl Knvltl Air 
lil'iH'--- Ki IVnt).', i'MlK, fi..llliwril HlV,. 

jtuu.v.i i.l Yrmh & !l ( "-l.-'' 

]lm IU | n * \ilrf(l, J.i.ltW Ilfi.i'll l.ll HI. 8 .' 
.;,- ,.',,'. l-il-,'!.'!- lul'tia Illnl I'"'"' 1 I" 1 '' 1 ' 
p,,!,'). ;.(-.. 'l..y'.Uir.-. r.ilif. Util'vnn i>( 
Neu ill \\ t'liiicin, .. 

||..Hinn kUrlionlr. riirn-. M Mi-nlr. 
I'ahf tl.;c..t.:U:l, HniHii nivltfll'n ''' 



I'Mi: Ciirit.. MLnncniioHii, Minn. ?1,BG(),. 
(l(h). Cinilliiiiiilii.li of wcn-li mi ilt'iilifu nnil 
il.'vrliil.iii.-iil. of n 17r,mm, li nil. KUII 
in. h'l'hlli'y. Minn. Itiirfim <if Nnviil 

WfllllDIIH. 

l.iirlthiTil Alri-rnft, Sunn vviilc, ('"Hf. Sl1,- 

f,r,0,mhi. W.n-li nn I'O.HKIMON n " i ! tll ' 1< ' 

nyiili'in. Sun n yvali'. Si'rial I niji'Mu 

IHIl.'i'. 

HiiiKlittvnnil Ciirp,. UnHJuril, III. SJll.UIK.- 

titill. !i|.ur<> HMnrml.liiTi fur '' '1 !'ti'-nin. 

Idn'Uftinl. Navy I'mvliaiHiu; Ollli-i-. Wniili- 

hinliin, I),C, 

Tn.n..-, lur., AiiMln, 'LVx. Sl,l)'!,II.M. 

I'.iij-l Inn ami Irclinli'iil m-rvli'i-rt I 1 '/'"! 1 " 

ni'i'liini wltli Nnvy mi- nyiili'im. Winili- 

Inrl I>.C. Hiircini i'f Sliiim, 

Ui.w I'limiiinil Co.. Cininl.'", N..1. SUl!'!'.- 
:IHH, Alnliilninii ,'Mvii"ifiiiri for ulrllrM 
iiialllin:. Ma.lliinn. 111. Niivul Air iwH\- 
iiivi-lni' (Vtilrr. Plillail.'liiliin. 
AVCO ('<tr|.., lU.'lnniinil. hnl, S'.I.ID'.I.IUM, 

I'tlLAIHS iiitinill iNiiuim-iitri. llli'hiiMiinl, 

;i|.r,'lul I'l-nVflit Olllr... 

1>. II. Hiiinfiiril. In.'., Mlnnil, I'ln. SI.MIU.- 
Vim. Hfhii'Dlloii ui" fiii'l iitnriiiti- nt l"i' 
Niiviil ,'iiaiinn, K-'V Wi'iii. Kin. Si'iiUn'ii"' 
IMv,, Iliirriin nf Yiinlii A Mm-U. 
Spinlnii Cnrii., Jiii'liiiiin, Midi. SM.'Mll.liiUi. 
I'l mliii'l (mi nf iii.iiiil.iiiiyn ami ri'lati'il .'iinil'- 
mriit. .liii'luHin, llmvmi .if Niival Wftipiuii'. 
(ii-in'ral UlrrlHr. Siuilii llnrliiini. t'nllf. 
.Sl.'.!',!;:,riir,. tilu.ly ami ili'i'clni. nil-lit t.f in-w 

A;t\V itali lli'.-lliiii Mini ninilyritii ttyi.tnuii. 

Saiila Hinl-iirii. Illlli'f nf Navnl Ki'in-iil't'li, 

\Vn-i1ilnnhin, I'.!'. 

Hal.ii'1' Aliiiiiliiiiiu A Till' in I nil Hiilivi, Hnl' 1 

Tlno]..., M.I, S1.'l!ili,r.Hll. Alum I i t">" 

iri,:il..nii fin' itii'llflil ninllliiK, Hiili' Tlua-l'i'. 
Naval Air I'lnn lin'.'i'llu! (Vuli-r, I l'"" 
.l.-ll'hln. 
i ItiiiiKliin Alrcrnfl. l.t.nu It'-nfli. I'liHf- *; 

lll!i,IMMI, 'I' A 1 1'', iilivrnfl. I V. Ui-fu-ri. 

Hiii'i'iiu nf Navnl \Vi'Hii"ini. 
Ami'.ii. I'l.n.,, Wmihriihu. Win. fl.'IT.I.IHMI. 
l''n.-l)lllf-i for On' inniiitfiirliii'i* f 1 ,!HiniiJ 
riiilrlili!!' i'a'.,.,. WiiiiluMlin, Hiirrun of 
Naval Wfiiiiiinn. 

i IliiUmi 'I', llvmvii, I"'-., l.nmt liiliiml. N.^, 
il kl!i iltill, Pi^.^iiiihli'llnll nnil [H't.illli'tlnll 

Inl M, .iiil-l.- t.-ilini: nf m '"' ll1 " 1 "I'l 1 ' 1 ^ 

,,,!,, hinit fm- til- NIIVV mill A r 1-n.iTr. 
I,, nil; Inlnnil. Mui'fuii nf Navnl Wi-iiliiHHi. 
Ili-ruillt' I'ltwtliT '"., fliiuisiin, I'.illf. 3V, ~ 
Hill 'lid, Mm-1' I "I'" M"il -I ti;nU"i'Ji ininl 

,,,, ' -> Vi -ln't'i, [iiuiHiMi, Nnvy Mlili'n 

[lulu rniiir.il C'ruii-r. Mirlitnil'-i'l'm-K. P. 
)!,. Vul Tiini.. I'lill'nl.'li'hlii, Si!,lt:t.f.l % .ti, 
A Kit! i -HI A mi'l -I'/ A w.-ninm lllll ' l .': lil ' 
I'lilhiil.-ll.litii, Nnvy I'liri-liii'iliiii Uilln'. 
Wii"Mni!lMii. I'."- 
I'lilli-.! Aln'nifl. I'ntli W , Wlll ' M "^. 1 ."' l a" 

I'l,.,! llai-lfni.l. I' $M,'.!VM'I, H' '" 

1' :i ,<i m lu. i for 111" All- l''mvi>. IMIHI Ihiil 
fni',1, Km', 11-1 of Navnl \\Viunmit, 
li,-n,'n.l I'.ln-li-i'-. :U-li.' n.'IV, N.Y, S:tV,- 

Nf,:i 1011. ll.'iirlnr III""' i-nliU"'!" 1 "! 51 '"' 
M11 ,|.-iu' l.nw.-r.-'l ..lill'i. Si-lifli.'i-UnlV, 

II in ,f !i1ill--i, , , , 

..ll.MMH'lAVnuii'r. 1'i.ri... flilnmn. *' "":; 

:i|l>, llmlHf "'"' f'"' A V', "!' i \ 
lt U,'..ll l flit.-m:.-. Nnvv Avinlloll Hnpj.lv 
HllU'f, I'llill.it.-ll'l.la, 

|',,l,,,| Al.'.'vi.tt. Ki.-U Mm'lfoi'il. ''i.ii, 
,,, : ,. p . t , t )i.ni, 'I'l' :i:t l' 'I '-nidii.'.'i foi- tli.. All 
f.ov,., lunii llm-ifni'il. Hun-mi nf Niivnl 

H Hin-rrv Itiiml C'ir|i., (in-m Nf'H, N,V, 3'.!,- 
nii', '.!V1, tilifjo lin'i'lliil Ni.vl.riillnn !iV"l'-m". 
i;i.-iir Ni'i-1., Mm.'iui "f iililini. 
tiniulvnir Tlrv R HiiMtrr I'.'., Al|i'..n. Itl.l.i, 
,;| iti:'.|i:-il, Item mnl Imik-iiinl-i-lir.t " ! " 
,,,. m 1<1l<"i for Mir Ami'liH'loti'i Anf.tnill l']"'l 
MMI.-NI. t.flflill.-M I'ml', AH/. IML Mn.l'i" 

liriimiinin Alr.i'iifl Hiiiiliivcnnic (iiri.,, 

|l,,l,i'-iiu', N.Y. '.!l,:ir.tl. l. l'r.lii.-II..M 

,,f :i ,;!: itiiv.'afi mnl ivli.inl i-.|..l|.ni'-iil. 

ll.-M.niH!.', Hm'i'i t Niivul \\Vii)">ii"'. 

I!, |lntf1ii' Alrrrnfl, rnll'-i l;'n. Ctitlf. '"''. 
h.ln.Kia |.:, ( II|I.MII-II! f'"' "liliHltoiiril nulnv". 

I till.'il.ui, Hi in "' Mliiini. 

Hiirrry ItHiiil forp., Ihilvii,- IHv,, !>1. 1 mi . 

Minn, Sl.l'i'H.H'l. tMii.,>.ll)t-.l > OiiHil. 

:U I'mil, Miii'i'iin of I'l'll". 

-lvi'1'.-v Ih.inl COM.,, Uulviii- lv.. ill, I'lnil. 

Minn. ri'"nrn""iilm! "f rniNiutlt'i-ii in I'"" 

Niivnl Alf l>i-v'l '"V 1 *'''""''' 'I';'," 1 "" 1 " 

vlll.-. I'll, Nuviil Air ll.a'.-l.ii'iiU'iil t't'ittt-i, 

.lllhllMIMIvllll', I'll. 

JlfHil CiiiiNlrticlliill I'".. Wiiiililiiiilini. IU-. 

si, 1 .:; 1 .!.'!!!!!. i'"<i(iti'ii.'ii"ii "t mi "'!"ii*"ii' 
to ilu- AllTUDIN fm-IHly ul Amlrawn 



Dfifonso Industry Bulletin 



Jolirm I!o|iliiiiH University. KIKw .Sjirimt, 
Mil. S7,H<ifl,ilH7. Continued refu-nn-li and 
development work on ituidi-d missile H.VII- 
teniH, liureau nf Naval Wuaiionii. 

(Jcncrnl Dynamics Corn., Tiunona, Calif, 
SM.BIHI.OIW. TKIUUBH and TAHTAH mhi- 
Bik'H, I'limonn. Itiinmu of Naval Wcii]"i!'. 

Nortli Amcrlrnn Avlaliiui, Aimheim. Calif, 
SI, 10-1 ,(1111). lk'jiii!rn (.1 o.'i-Uilii nnidoln of 
whin liu'rttu] navigation HytiK'in nynisicoiic;!, 
Aiiuhulm. lliii't'im of Hlilim, 

--Itaytlieon Co., Oximrd, Calif, SLi.ijriil.imil. 
mwi'loiimciil. mudclu .,f || ,(. i>o,ilr<d i.yti- 
tcniii for tin- iMinlr- piihtt ilcfi-nin' Hiii'fa.'r 
mliwili, HynU'm iinuirnin. Oxnunl, Navy 
I'lmilinHlnir ()([],.(,, I,,,,, Annolcii, 
Hi Collins Itii.lio Co., Cvdar ](a|>!dn, l.iwa. 
Sfl.Hia.HOII, tiiir,i]ioin.nln for tin- AN/ARC 
fil radlii lined on A-il-' mid I 1 ,'tA ain-rafl, 
Ci'dni- Kaiiiiln, ^ Navy I'nri'liaidnjf OllU'i', 

llcrniltu I'owdcr Co., Haimim, Cnllf. si,. 

SaiiKim. Navy Kliipti Piiriti Onnlvot 'Onli't 1 ,' 
Mflolinniciiliiint, 1'a, 

-General MoIorH, liKlliinnimliii, I,id. ,?l,- 
12H,HQO, tlonvisriiliin kllit fur T (ill nh- 
cnift uMjclni'H, huliiinniHilln, Navy Avia- 
tion Humily Ofli,.,., lMiilad..l]ililii. 

--Unlleil Aircirafl, Kniit Ilarlfurd ('mm 
?8,Gllfi.ORfi. ,1 7B l'-.i:i1l mK \ nm 'for ll,. 
Air iMiriU!, Kant llai'lf.ird. Hur.iiu of 
Navnl Weiiiionti. 

-(iVncral 1'rrrlHlon, lnr., I.iitlo l-'nlhi, N.,1. 
SS.liri.aBI. I'roilttcthin .if navlitntion cum. 
imtur HKtti for Navy iiln-nifl. Tjlllli- 1'iiHn 
Hiirtrnii of Nnvnl WrapiniH. 
nHpcrry Hnnil Cnrji.. Hperry (iyrtun-oiic Co 
(irniit. Nock. N.Y. $l.|ifll.mm. lii-dninirii' 
lalloii radar IH-IH. Crcat Nn-li, Iliiivan of 
Nnvnl \\'oa|niim. 

or. ol i ' J ^ tnc ' I '' ( '' 1 " Avlntlmi, Ainilii'lni, Calif, 
S-.01H,l)l)7. Falirlralhin and fi-ul of a|r- 
iiurm. AHW rndin- mH. Aiiflholin. Kuronii 
(if Nnval wi;ii|ioiiw. 
"-llnllcd Alrrrnfl, Knm Ilnrlfnrd, Cniin 

iT l> ^ !ll '1" K ,, Jli 2"''-A uiiKliii!H. Knnt 
Hni-tforil, Hiin-ai, ( N, m ,| W.HIIHIIIH, 

L'^Pl"' 81 ^ 1 l ltftl ti( " d .I'nirallcmai 
|nninl(.nniii!it of loloniolry iiuilallalji |n 

I *"_!!.". .'"' l ' 11 ' Nrlvy I'lii'iiliiiiihiK Ollln-. 



TniljiiiiK Hi'tst. H!nirlmiii|>l'in. Nnval 'I'r/iln- 

Init llt-ih'i' (Vulov, Url In, Ji'lii. 

I'l.nmnUli liuli,lrli(l I'l'mliU'ln, f.hrlM.vrnn, 
Whi. iii.r.ir,.;!;M. ;;h.)ill/ln); c,>,,t,;i .,,,!> 

f.ir Ll.Vr.inni riu'k,-!;., Mirliov r i,i,, Nnrv 

.Shiiui Tai'ln I'oiiind I'.'hlci. M. .hinili .- 

lilll'K, I'll. 

llnliN-.KIi-f, In.'., n ml IM'M'-ll l'nu',1,1,. . 

turn, Si'sittli', Wiuili. si,'ii;:i.;:i;n, Ciiti'iinn<- 

H< f an Air Tr i iiilnal llnil'lln;: nn.l in. 

AilininhU'uHiin Hiilldhn: i,\ \\\-- Nnvnl Mu- 
ll Aiinl,, Alii'.lui. N'H'tlnv,",! |i|v , 

Itiin-iiii uf Yni-itn ^ lirirl.M. 

';n {'iirllHM-Wrlnlil r ( ii,i,. Wvli-lii ,\I'!<MIF,IIIJ.'II| 
Dlv., Wnini-Klili!.', N,,l. ^I.Hi.'I.IHiii. Mi>, in 
HiiMIHU'l JlU.Wtli xiiiMMi"! fur A 1 II ami 
!' 1 I' (iln-t-dfl. Woi.O Kliliir, Nui'v Aviii 
Hun Mii|i,.lv nillri', rlillM.l.dplilu, 
Vni'ii, lin\. ijinl/iinl. '|V\, : I. 'm;, ,ii.S. 

Clliili'il liil:.:i|l|. || -!i,-l'i wllh |INM,<I , 

I'll' 1 " f"i' N I 1 ' i nltvnifl, (l,n I I. 

Navy riir.'liiinliiK lull,',,, \Vji>,|ihu'i-,h Hi' 
Arllmr 1), l.llll,-, In.'., r>iiiilnlili--. . 'M,,': 



, 

IVIlliunrH,, Inm Klvrl rr(i., Illrlnn ..... I 
Calif. I. '.!'.! t.'ll'.!. ilvi-rlniul ,,f il ..... ||,., 



.. , 

82.H7ll.2Kil. M.| h m dln |( m >f 

1 " 1 (MJVII> - n " l!hmlmm - 



and tmliiiyninmi i>f Mil), Inn- tin I 



f H 
J!? yn! '""liiilHc-ji, lnr., ICiiRln^or |'i-,,i1iit-(,i 

;: , ' " Iml|11 . C'lHf, si,ii[i!!,imi. Air. 

,\V, , l.:,ll l! f ""il'wiidff nn A 4A nn.l TA 
ih ni'rnfl, Alliainlii-a. Niivy Pm-i'liiinlnif 
oniro, WanhiiiKtiiii, ]).(' " 

8l,02'l,H77. (Idiuitriicllnn .if a liHudntt 
AH' ., "",., ''"'"'nn'ilnil.loini riiiit(>ni at 
{ "!! S ,. rat ,. l'lHrlorM. N.irf,||! 



. n. 

J 1 ' I'ttlrrnl Lnhorntorlcii, nivlnli.n of 
{ytprnml.,,,ij| Tiilonliono & T il^rn , ( , n 
Nulloy. N.J. SI,I!(iH,.l!U. KM" vo r , 

n 



' /""' r ' (1 Atiftolcn. IB.KKO.. 
m. , ' 11111 / ""Wnrt for rndnr nyn- 

terns. Los Annolen. Iturcnu f 

Si 



Z\ 



(iyroiicoite Co., Sverty Itniiit Corn 
^' Y i '''"".OOO. DoveloJ Lnt o( 
nnvlirnllon HiibyiHorrm for mill 

. Syoawl. Iluroau of HM|w, 

"In? 1 ' l l ! c ".. I ''r icr( ! 1 Si'stoniH Dlv., Uiick- 

nlni V' n V'? 10 ' 888 - ""^ ..... "I I 
mont of n (latn iiroccnB nif Hyntcin fur 

'^'"'^V,? 'o 
of Nnvn] Weniimia. 

o/ Wmihlnirton, Applied Phutlm 
Uliomtory, Sealtlo. wWh $1.410 
""' ll lopnwnt work 1 ' Urn 

" 



, , , ,|,-, 

I'arlii Cimirnl t'.|ii,.|', Mr.-liiml,-,-] ...... . I',. 

M JITIB llnivanl Mli-drli' ('., I'ldnmliu., uhl,, 
*Uirif,.IHlll, I'nvlujr ..... I IhilHl,,,. ,,r mi, 

wny ulioiildrr nl IhmUv Mill AI'll, li,<l 
iMhliv.'iit Illv.. HIHTIHI i, I' Ynv,I:i ,t tiu.-l,:- 
Idiytlii'iin Cii,. l,f\fiti:iiin. MIIIM., $; u;>\\ i;,'i 

KlIITlMiTI'hli: Illlil il,;il);|, MrivllTi 111 ',,,11 

nirllon will) lli,. HI'AIUKIW w,ii|,,.,i ,,in 
li-ni. l,,'\lmr ..... , lliii'.'nn of Ntivnl \\'m|,,-hr,, 

in l.jirrdl Cnri,,. Allti-pn-iirrti Mf,r. I'.,., 
1' ....... Ix, Arl/,. jjsj.'.ni.mii), T vi; i; n - 

'iiKliiivi f.. i- Air I.'MI',-,, llm | Kaw nlm ( ,(i. 
I liiti'Hlx. lli.i'.'iui ,,f Mnvnl \\Ya|.,.ii,i 
IdixUiciMi Co., t,r\ln, .(,!, M,,.,,,, JJM 1V1 , ,-,, 
(tiililnmv mid ronli'id m.Mn.-i f,,, ;i|,|,.. 
wlh.lpr mliiKllrH. I,o ( v,dl. M IIN i. |li,,vi ..... ( 

Naval \\i>a|ioii,i, 

Aliilitv (.'i<it|ili.vMknl AnMii'lnirfi. In.',, Noi 

S"'". 1 ' K iji . M - (l!l ''-">. (1 ..... IN'-' f .. 

Mnrlnr (ii<n|,|i |Vn tcnl Hinvny l'ri. M i<niii N.n - 
S ..... V 1 ' 1 ,' 1 '" rlltl NinlhwrHi I'aHll,. <(,,., 
Ntiviil Ocnut,,,.,.,,,,!,!,. oill.'.-, :;iili!,,,.|, M.l 

."I l.nral l.nrii,. ltn,n\, N.Y, gl.miu.imii, |i,- 
iilvii, ilinv!o|,ii,,,| lt ,,,,,1 ful.vlrinlon ( i, ,i 
I'."" 1 " 1 " ,<;' '" ..... iv.'i,lvliii( r,nil|>m<-n< 

. ' I'" 1 !^ ,'"'' ..... f Naval H'mimiiN. 

M MfNllhitlMiiiNi, Uln-lrlP, I'lM.lmi'Kli, ], | IM 




i 

H.d. -1.11 



,, 
ir IM.W.-IV.! ,,|,|,,. t . SUHHM ...... I,,, 

" Hll'l fMr.llr.lHm, nf ,,,.,.!,. ,,!, 

iH'r,.M for ,m,|,ar ,, ( ,w, ( ,,| ,!),(,,!, 
..!fill- n-noKir niaiit Mi-ivlr.- ., 
[nr niiclnir |n,wt<n-il )il|m. ni.(;:i'i 41111 
l " "ml fiinilntiliiK .if rn.rior nli.nl 

'""". 84,n;iiM:t4 - ,irii K ,, and'! r! , 

n ' l . i r l< "' , i ' li " ti ''IH..H..,I. 

I'l.iilliniHi ,,f , V;1 ,. tl ,,.|, nii.l 
I"'" 1 ' 1 ' ' "'" II 'H V ,nv 
" 



.-r ., ,-,,. tlr ,, n(1yi N<Vi 
I' 1 " ivn-liTil Him. n.Mlntnl-t fr,, m ,!. 

lll ;' 1 " -;f Hhi|.. $.Hin,itim. t ,, 'i, 

'id .Icwlnmjmiu ,v, ir)l I,,' ..... n.v,, , 
''"'"i 1 ITtiiHilBltm l).-ld, |4.fimi,4li(i rv|.lnr. , 

iiii "" 1 "f /.-licit.!- i.[ ( ,, ..... in,,,,,,,,.,, ,: 

- 



1 

mival mirh-iir mwi-rwl nlilj,;,, 



S|.illi..;nii 





AIR FORCE 



, . tr 

f, if- ">. t. ,'. r,., t, (1 ,.|..,-v hiJ 

i' 1 '. U.lt'1,1 I'.,.!.- ...... .\ I It 111,1,, 

llli(lnilll.l- I'll', III, l',,|||,, ll f ,i| (ll , I,').!,, 

"--' 1 -". ''" ........ " "' .-(I,, ..... '. f,,,' 

"t") I (.11, ,,,f! h illf ,.n \,., 

' 



A " W ' e '''"" ''""'u.l 

' 



. 

t;.-n.-ii n.-iui. . v...,, i, HM1 -,, , ., 

...... . ...... . ' ...... ...... -.r inn,,. .t. <,* I.M,,.,',,,',, 

''" '' "''";' ...... '" -""i..-. w,,, I.;,,,,. 

A' 1 " 1 ...... M- "I ,',v i ..... im i \| .;,, 

VV,||-M l',ii!,-i ....(, .1 | |i. i ,),!,, 

NltMll \Mtrtt>nil A.Ul|..|l. .\ I...],, I,,,, I'll |lf 

'M"''."! 1 . 1 '' ..... I'-HI.-M! . r.. ( ():< liom,i..,,i 
MINIMI-MA:; ,-ul.l., ..... ,.,,, V, , . , 

- 11 """"""' ;ti;i i% "" ''' 



V":!" 1 "" /" ' ..... i i.iri Kitiiin,.. 

tiMlB.,..,.,, , A.-........^!.^! ;n n ,.-,,n tlh. 

Al,i . Wil,:!,, f.Hi..,. ..... Al II. Hl,l,., 

I llllFI'llrtliiMirl. lit',, H.-M 1'nili N V 
' 



I.KKA i, .,!,,( joun.-t, n , ,-.f..', [.., I'drin 
' ";. ll.-n. li. || n ti|.i.- :l>.ti.-,,,r, Illv. 

' Al /.I',, I,, , Aln:,-!i-* 

AVi'u niti'.. Htvotf,.,,!. |-, (!ti , li i,(!:;i, ni 

.'""!;"< ....... ,' 'i' f-i i"- H. ,.i.r. ; . - i i ! .|,,.-, f,., 

ill.' Nniv ,,i,,| Air I ,,,,-,- si',!f ( , tl | ,v-it.. 
muti.-i.l iii.au-,,,, lit,. ,AI :;(' i, Wttulii. 

i'MM.-!^,,, AI H, I ltd.,, 



,< f -iii iirii,. 
Uoln.ii lt.liil.utn, r,,,,,, ...... ., ti.n.f.J,,. 

tlj--rll |,.,ri,i f,,,. .1 ,,., ,. 1J|r |, tl1 f,, ( . '] -(/ 

MI '?'A . ' M *" H A.-r,.tiHiiUi'l !i^iri, t 
Mlv, IAI(.t!i, VVrlBl,! I'niirn,,,, AMI, (||>|,., 

w v 'J*! 1 ,^'"""" 1 "" 11 r '"P- KdnltiirBt. 
H.V. ^.!l1|.-.Mh r r ,..l=,.u.,,r ,,f -r^,, i , ( - l ' 
wi'iiin.l .-.ii.li.i.i,:,,! j,.,, t.itd^.jnK Rtl il n nrv.-v 

n'i '"'i.,.!'; t " l|l ', lt - 11 A,M-.Hmiit-a1 ii^i^hin 

IMv. (At 111 i. Wrlatut 1'BUrt,,,,,. AHI, Ohio, 

!' (.*timl HlrrUir, Mtrnn,!*-. [,' V J'llifiumm, 



nmruiiianiHiliin nlil[i 



. 
f,,r ihP Atr f..t. B n 

||| B ^,(,,[..,1, nm t 
a M V , B| ,,, P . N.y,, 
r. m ,,| i^irlrh AKII. 
HI., .AlJil'l. 1,.^ 



April 1966 



" .Jim (ii I i.r>|>i,i I "i I',, I ,1.1 inn-Ill I'llMi, 

Art/,, ?1.'.!!PI','U7. l(i<|niir iit-rvli'i-u fur Army, 

Air I''IHV nl Nnvv iiirlmi in- rmlnr. I.jicl'i, 

It, -hi I'nili. Wnini'i- Knlilii'. Air Mnli-rh'l 
Ar.'i. i AI'TCi. Knl.lm. AFIt. (In. 
A, .1. lii.lii'dri.Ti, l-;i Muni,.. Cnllf. JH,DH;I,, 
LIU. PiiiiliirlKiii ill In. -I I nnU n<ni.<inl>||<i 
fur I' !<' aii.-rnfl. Ill Muni.-, () ( !,l,'h Air 
Mi.lrih'l Arm (Al'I.Ci. Hill AI-'H, Uttili. 
10 rnlirMhl ('iiiiii'in/liinlMiini'iil Ciirii,. .'iyim- 

n.'l, N.V. :>1, mill, mm, I'mihirll f nir- 

rrnfl <-iimi-ii.'i, JiyirnH, A i-l nt.niK kill 

.'iyrilfinn Div. i A !'.';<' i, Wrlnlit.l'iilh-1'iniii 

ATM. Ul.in. 

llnrlmr CD,, ,'icfiiilr, Wimli, ,<::,i:in,wjo. 

'I' Ml i'iii!lui< iiuiiiiivi-nii'iil ini'KMim, .Sitiiiilr 

Ai'i-nniuiMi'i.l .'lynt.-ni,! Illv. i Al-'fiC), 

Wrli;)il-l'nll.'r: ll( |i A I'll, (ll.iu, 

(H'liiTiil Clr. III.', Cliirliiin.il, I 111 lit f I I - 

lum.iSIIII, Wr.tl. mi n inniiul^lnn ,,v in 

fnl 1 lillill |ii-l (nl lllilllr ( nil iih'ijli- n 1 1 i- 1 11 f | , 
Clnriiniiil i, A i-u M i, HI I (ru I iiynl. <[,,,, |)|\ 
lAI'.'IC), Will-Ill I'lilh-MM,,, ,\i''li, (11,1,,. 
I'nitnl Air. mil, I'ii.'.i Mm if, ml, I'min. 



ll li'hl Svnf.'ini) II Iv 

(AK.'.i:). Wilnlil-l'itftfi'miii A I'll, Ol.in, 
I'lilllii'i Kiulln I'.'., r, ,| ( ,i li.n.l,!'., huvn, 
?l,!MM: p ;', I'l.nhlrlli.n <il . >,nn\i>i\, n1!u.i 

'ii'i'i ..... ''it r..i in' .n; i.ii.'i'i.ri, c.,ii,i 

Hiipililn Ai-i iiiiiiiitlrii) : 1\' :il nun |ih' 

(Al'.'irt, Will! Ill .I'nll.-IJiiiil AIM, lltlln. 
II Hull" ...... 1 hiiilHHili'liI ''nil',. Kllnl.nuil 

N.Y. ;::i,;!V!i,Viiu l'i n<l.u i |<.n -if .., ,,,,.,' 

Ilininul runllnni'lil f ...... un,,iiiK nlnl mil Vi-v 

"Viifi'in-i, I'll ni I ..... <\. Ai-i.iin>i.H>-nl S\n<i>ni;t 

hiv, (Al'Jil 1 ), \ViltrlM. l-aHr,. mil At li. UUi.i, 
I'nihil .Ul.inM. Hiilli'.ri'.'.linnh.nt Cruli'i 
iimiiiyviitf. 1'iillf. SI 1 .11 1 !.. n Hi. l'i ni|n, ( |<ni 
nf i.iilnnnr.' li.'in.t. J(.->l* ..... | f|| V , Cnllf 

dn.li'ii All .Mal.'ih-l AI.-I, tAM.i'i Hill 
AMI, Hd.lt. 

NiH'tnu (',. ;!i'iintt>. Wd.ili. if: 1 . nun, ..... >. ](,-. 
tifiiri-li, i1i^rli.|,ti,iini. li-ii i.ml . -111:11. .-.'I'll. i; 
(or ox'ili-i nJK-uili'ii ..f \Vliti{<i I iliiiniidi v 
nf III.. MINUTKMAN ,-,-,! .,i,,ir,n 
tint Ml.-. ItiUh-iii,. ;,, .,!,.)., jt) v , I A I 'ill M 
Nnri..,, Al'II, Tnllf. 
M I'lillt-il Alrunll, t<;<,,,i Hmifm.l, r ...... 

?l.0lil.:ill.. t'l.nl^HlHI Hf .-l,,,,,,,,,!,.!,!,, f,,, 

t"" -I f 'i' nil. niM, llit'H llnilf.inl, ;),i,| 
Anlnnii. Air M.ii.n,'] A n'ii lAlU'i li.-llv 
A1''H, 'I i'i, 

If- I.Viit'rnl M.,|II,B. ,\r ;i|.i,i|, i-j,,,. | t | v 
Milv.iiiilu'1-. U't'i. SI,:'.Hi,!n,r. !(.!,, n.-li inni 

''''V;' ........ '"' '"' "'" ''' ''AM II Iit.-Hh.l 

t;iiiiliiin',. tuoti-iti. MilwHoln-t., lii.HriM.' 
Mviili-mri Illv, t ,\\ ;[,' ,, j-j, ,., Anij ,.,,1,^ 

Hiiithrn Aln rn((, lnl!,-iimi. t'nllf, SI , 

';f',"tllt. I ..... Iv ..... I ,1,-MKi, ^..vlll,-,,!!,.!^ 
fill 1 l'.l.-li,-||| All C..IIIIM! iVdl.-u, lulhl- 
Jtill. KI.-'-M.Mll.' ili.ifvlm, tliV, I Al'Mfl, 
1., ((. lldlru'.xo 1'1,'hl. Mt.^., 

Klfi (nuilr ( '1.1111111111 it lUl'nifl, Id,'., !ii 



i'ti'1 Ai.'n lAM.i'i, 'I'lulu-.- At H, UMn 

Hi llpiull* run-,. T.-i.-.'imt-M, rJ.-i, 3:1 im I',". 

I'r.Nh!,,!,,,, , t ),..- ...... (,. ,,,1,1,,,,,,.,,, f,,, 

. Ml Hil.'Mlfl, IVl.-ll.nr,,. A.-|,,!, ttl llh-l 

'V:.' 1 ^ 1 " 1 . |l|v - "AIMirt, W.i^lil-l'nM.'i,:!.., 

At' H. niiin. 

IV Hvniin ,M(K. Tn.. MmmtUit, f,,ltf, !! 4',i" . 
I'!.. I. I'nolurilmi ..( ,,,,. , i|( n M f,,, utirfnd 



> !l ''"etl.!! '''I.. Wlr-IH!,.. hnu, fll r.Ml.mnf 
Mmlini'hll.,,, ,.f |! ny i ....... , , !|nil . v, 1 !,-!,!,,,. 

kliiln,,,,,, i (tv j\j,, M H!l . ttt .| Ali . tl lAl | |( - ( 
llnl..', Al II, Illtin, 



(u-)K.jii AIM. oiii.T 

HHH Hfj.ui.. r n iir s^,, 

,,I I..,,,,!, pi,.,,,.,- ,,>,, 
,n>.ii-r. I'nlK ,!-!. 
Arm |Al'l,<'r. f!-,*-!!!* 



,.,. 

r H. tin, 



fiuler llnniiiirr, | H1 ',, Airl-n^ Ji lS in, 
iin-iiN l,nl.'.(ni,, r y, IW? ],(,, [j.y, fl: 1 - 
WllMHili, W.-rh ; rt |ht (, ,"..,. r,,, 
(ifcrFlini| rftilar ii,-i,n ..-, ' - 



torn* KriHliitvrinii t;t,,i.]i .AI-JilM, Wrfuti). 

I'llMfKlnll AI It. (i)ll.- 

Jtonwwtii, tnr.. il(.|.hd. Minn. n.y;-j.aifi 
v. tt i L l ' r ",' I"'""" "^'"^ Arr..ii(,.- 
' 



' ;'." 1 ; 1 "." ( "'nlnl i-i|llllitl,,'nl, Klo.-k- 
"M''i .'-I \, ''''"'"""''inn Ail> Mi'li'H''! Arm 

lAH.t.l, MrCMInn Al<'ll, Cn||f. 

''''"'I"! llynnmlrii, Sim HI,.,.,,. (!nl(f. Slp . 

M "[!; !th ' M"" 1 "' Mlii for r 10;: nl,'- 

'nill .'M.'uml fn,.| innli iiitfHMiihli.M. San 

IV'M- 11 " 1 ' 1| : | ,' 1 I " 1 V" 1 " Air Mnl,-r| ( .} Ami 
iAH,< i. MH:I>|]IIII A HI, Clir 



Utirricr Hi-starch. 

Cliiih'niiUi : Majoi' (iciu-ral Leslie 
K. Simon, TI.H. Army (HttUniil). 

('iirrcnt IK! line (.'.-roiipji urc cnii<liii:l,- 
iiifi' -sUnlics an follow}!: 

('nnil)nt Vi'lu'flc \\'cii|nin Sy.slcni. 
Cliainnuii: l>r. William C. 'I'iaiis, 
Vuu; I'i'i'Hiilciil, Hull Tch'honc 



:riir hinder, I,,.',, Craiiil ](ii|itiln, Mkli. 
^'.'"'".I'lH, I'r.irmvmi' ..... f nlri'rnfl. i;yn,- 

"<'i'l>.':> ninl npur.. imiln. (iruiul ]tii]iiihi. 
A.'iniiiHiilnil HvHi.'inji Illv. (AKHC), 
N ifiilii-l'iiit.-niim ATM, Olilu, 
MdHinivi^ (., |.' ( ,,-t Wiiync, linl. Sll.llH,. 
I!"K I'l-uilitt-lii ..... f nlnti'iin .niiiiiiiml.'iii.liiii 

"Hit, 1-nri Wiiyui-. AIT. ..... uM.'iil .'Syiilfinsi 

l>lv. lAI'MCl, \Vrli;h|.|'h!l,.r:inn AI-'H. Dliln. 



ll " ll|l|l| ll I'f ''"Hill ....... Ill II fnv 1. 1,-,.] | !,(,. 

'iillilcn.i.-ii.,inv nynlr ..... . CUI.' ...... . Arm- 

MHtlllnil Jiynln,,,, |)| v . (Al-'till), Wi'liilll- 
I'lilti'Minii ATll, Oliln. 

Hi'iiilU Ci>r[i,, TrliTl.om, N.,1. s:i,lHll,l),|]. 
rimliirlliiii , P f nlii'i-nn iinvlnnllnniil .inn- 
Mili'in, Ti'irrliiir,), Arn UNI n If nil MymciHit 
Mlv. lAl Jil't. Wi|,:lii.]'iil|.-i-;.iiii AMI, nhl.i, 
l,nrl>lii'.'il Alr.-nifl, Miirirtln, ( j. ^l.li:!'.!.- 
Ml, I'lnihirtliMi i.r I! Ill) ulr.'.nfl IIIH! 
n Inh-i) i i|iil]<in.-iil, Miii'irllii. Ai-i 1 ..... iiilli-iil 

' ' 




Miiiilii-.Miirlclln. liiiltliii.it.', Mil. Sl,.l!i(),.. 
1 ..... . Mi"hli.-nt ..... nf It [.; niivnifl, Mlihlt.- 

lllv.v, M.I. WHIM, r.Kuliln Air Mnln-li-l 
Ai.-n iAri.fi, Iti.l.ln,. Aril. (in. 



Army Stioiitiftc Aitvliort 

(( 'initnim it ii'inn I'iifii< 7) 

(Jenei id Mailllf, 1 '!', lllsl ilulr nf 
I'llrrf i it-ill and 1'ilerl nunr:i 1'lu 
Kinei-rji. Inc. 
[ iirwiii'tl Art'ii Air DofciiHc \\CHJI- 

I1IIH, 

("hjiinitun: hi . William il. Tiniiii, 
\'ice rrriiiilent, Hell 'rel.-phnne 
I.II(MI) ulurlrM, 
Army AiiTraft, Kcjieuivh and DC- 



i: Mr, I 'lmrN'!i H, Xiiu- 
IIH'I Ililill, Dlirf I'lll^ilH!)*!', (I.H. 
Aimy .Mitlcrii'l I 'nmniantl, (At 
linn- nT ;Hiii|y In- \vjitt Ilirrrtur, 
i'.'i llriii'iiii'li. Xatiiiiiul 
fii inn! Spsict 1 Ailinin 
mti). 
Antiliinli WniiHMiH. 

Chtiniuitii: Mr. Kirlmi'il ,S. iMnr;ic, 
I 'linn limn, I 'i ymii'l ii'ii ('tn'pni'a 
(JIMI. 



iUi; Hi . .Iniui K. \'i ..... , 
I'rt.l'i-iMii' iif < 'iH'iiii.'.lry, Ni'\v 
Yuri: (fiiUvrjiity, 
urlti'ul Aliliiiiiiilir Diitii I'moi'MHinj,' 

Hj'Hlt'tHK. 

Clnuiiiiini : [ii'iii] William I.. 
Kv.<] in, Cullr};,' of KiiKMinT 
iiiK, t'liivcntily nf Illiiiuin. 



i: Hi-, l-'ttui .(. I.urHi'ii, 

H'-Jiilly llJn-ri.il' nf |l|-fr|l!i' 

Ui":'\ircli mill MiiKiiii't'i-iiiK (Al 
Hint' nf atinly Itc wnn Vin- 
rrviiicknt, Uuiuiywel), Inc.). 



Tactical Air 

('liairman ; I'rofenMor hawninni 
II. O'Neill, Associate Dtiiui, 
Sfliool of MiiKim'criap; and Ap- 
plii'd .Science, and Di rector, 
Klecl roiiic!! IJeseacch I jalmra- 
ttiryr ' 'til um hia University, 
Ui'sijtn Criteria, Kill u re Armonid 

Vi'hiclcN. 

riuiirmaii: Dr, Allen I-;, I'uckel.l, 
K xi! (in t i ve V ice 1' re.sideiit , 
llue;heii Aircrafl ( !o. 
Mow well has the Army miccce<|e<| 
in ulili'/.iniv il.-i panel of scientific tal- 
ent? Thin i:i amiwered in ptir( liy 
pninl.il))',' (o concrelt- accomplislimeiihi. 
Ili'Midcji the llnee nlenl ioaed previ- 
imsly, Ihci'e arc other nic;i tin' cant con- 
trihiilioiKi fur which AH A I' ad hoc 
Knmp ^Indies are n'Spmuiilile. Thcue 
inclnile: 

The formation of Tim Army lie- 
sciircli Council, which inslilnted major 
co i ice | it cliaii)','i'ii in the ordain/ill ion of 
Army Malerirl (lomnmml lahorutoriitfi. 

Cnaliniiation or Icnninalion nf 
Kpet-ilic Army aircraft 1(^1) project:!, 

I'l'iii'iiremeal, and lent of auto- 
matic switching eipiipment for tucli- 
cal t'ommiinicat ioiiit. 

I'liihaiieiniv eU't'ctivenenH and pre;:- 
line of licienlilii- pei-Honnel in Army 
lahoratnrie.'i, 

Cnnce]i|M for forward area air 

Thin in only a fractional lint, ami 
a partial tenlimoay to I he eU'eclivc- 
neuii of (he Army J<i'ienlililc Adviimry 
I'aiH'l. The frei|in-nl rei|iii'!il.;i fur Hie 

i'niHi:icliiiK' iiervii f ASAi 1 Indivj- 

dualii further indicalen the diversity 
of the panel'!! illiope. Them- reinie-ilii 
have included cal hi for asshilancc 
raiiifinn from siirveya hy juininr iii'ien- 
lil'ic pi'i'.-nmnel in jitaleitiile Inborn- 
tm-icii tu uinlniiili dtitecUou jduilioi in 
Vietnam fmni enviroiiiui'iilal mcdl- 

. I . ;. 1 1 i . > 

Cine Di I lie U 'PpH','1 lo COIIH IIII lltntt In] III 

in miter Hpuce. 

Wilhoul exeeplioii, ASAI 1 pcrMomiel 

mi\ nlhiiHiiiitlically acci'pled Un'se 

chtillenw". TtiiUlnh lliese iil'ii .-:ome of 
the nation':! luuiioil, men, they have 
willingly rearranged full itchediileii on 
nhorl. nolicej (hey have atlendi'd meet- 
ill;'/' faiUifnlly; many huve worlteil 
on (heir own lime |.o follnw through 
MU HolutioiiH lo upccilie \t&\) prnh|em,'i. 
In (iliurt, tht-y have pluced their coun- 
Iry'fi luininenji Unit ami the Army in 
and Knitet'ul for their K''ii 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 2O3O1 
OFFICIAL BUSINESS 



POSTAGE AND FEES PAID 



( MAY 1 U 1!)GO 



Cost Information Reports 
Orientation Meetings Scheduled 

The Department of Defense, in cooperation with the Nalinnal 
Security Industrial Association, the Aerospace Industrie;; A:;;;ueia. 
tion and Electronic Industries Association, is sponsnrinj 1 ; a series 
of orientation seminars on the Cost Informalum Keports (CIK). 

Sessions will he open to Defense Department and industry execu- 
tives and are designed to provide orientation as to which orjvani/a- 
tions will hi! responsible for completing; C1IJ reporting- rnpiiri'. 
monts mid usinji' C1H datn. Attendants will also be ar<|iiainled with 
the need for the (Jilt, the tochnii|ues of implementation and the 
oxpectod useof CIK data. 

A representative from the dlliee of the Secretary nf Defense 
will be 011 hand at each presentation to ansu-er <|iii>:tiinii:> The 
session* will be approximately throe hours lonjv. The Ural im-elmi-- 
was held in Wa.shiiitfton, D.C., April li), 

In formation can be obtained hy contacting Jack I-;. Mnliln OHiee 
oJ. the Assistant Secretary (if Defense {Comptndler), Unnm ;iMKf.V, 
llio Pentamm, VVnshmjvtnn, D.C., (Area Code L!(:i) OXford 7 vr.ll. 
Requests lor attendance should be sent no later than 10 davs 
to the date oj the orientation, and he accompanied liv I lie 
01 the individual, company and address, and position or 
grade, 

Kxiict atldi-essas of the orientations will he jvivon , t , ir |, r ,..,.i s i|-u,i 

ft weoJt prior to tip scheduled session. Attendance w e limited 

to 100 reprasentfttives (50 (Jovornment; and HO industry) Addi 
tJional serums will he scheduled in ea,se of excessive remif'sls iW 



Current schedule is a.s follows: 

April 26 Dayton, Ohio May IH 

UfflAnKoloN.CnliP. May It) 

Seattle, Wash. May M 

St. Louis, Mo. May a/I 

San Fraricisco, Calif. June 1 

Boston, Mass. Juno 2 



May 
May 4 
May 9 
May 1 
May 17 



HI, D.( 
Atlanta, (Ju. 
St. Louis, Mo. 
Dallas, Tex. 
St. Paul, Minn. 
Denver, Coin. 



SAAMA Assigned 
C-5A Repair Mission 

San Anliiniit Air Materiel 
Area (SAAMA), Kelly AKI1. 
Tex., has hreii ilr:iii>liiitei| I iy the 
Air !''nr< i e l.ujiihlie:; ( 'inniiiand as 
the speriali/ed i-ejuiir aelivily 
(SKA) fnr Die (' !,.\ heavy 
I nuispitrl aircr:il'l , 

A:i SKA fur I he newe.-il Air 
KniTe weapnn :iy; ( |eni, nuw en 
I'Tllli', Ihe prndlirlinii :ilaf',e, 

SAAMA will ;,eiv.' a-i the I'neal 
IHiinl fur niajur uverluiul work 
when (In- aiivrafl ln't'<iiue., itpttr- 
alintml in Itnilt, ( 'idmi-l llamld 
\\'afker head'i (lit* new (' , r A 
Serliun at SAAMA. 

SAAMA wa.-i .irh-eli'tl earlii'i 
a i ;iy:itfiii !,U|i|tnrl nianaji'i'i' 
( (SSAI) fur tin' jiiaiil carrier. 
Tin 1 SSM h n':.ptnr>ihli< fi.r 
world-wide inaitaKt'ineii! nf Intrlti- 
licsj ;iuppnri uf llu- lni(i:>|inri. 

The lateiil a L > Ue, ntueiit lu 
SAAMA relati\i mily In the air 
Iraine and airfraim 1 
SIJA fnr the nirrmrc-i 
IIMH nnl tti'ttii nitiiKHi. Oklahoma 
t'ity Air .Maleri.-l Area, Tinker 
AI-'IJ. Olvla,. i;> SSM fur Hi.- en~ 
J'.iiie, 

The {' 5 A is heiiiK ilt-veloped 
Mini will he pnitliiee.! hy htck- 
liwiUd^irjriuCti. til il ! Marii'lta, 
<!a., plaiil. Devclnpin. u( and 
prndnrUnn of ihe eri^ine will hi! 
iwrfnniiril by Ci-nera! lOlcetrie 
Co. 



Volume 2, No. 5 

7 / 




ASSISTANT SECTARY Of 
DEFENSE-PUBLIC AFFAIRS 



May 1966 



IN THIS ISSUE 

I'liviiilriil ,lii|ui'.im I'l'Kt'H NiiliiHiill Kuppnrl 
ill HHili lull III O|i|int hlllity I'lUKl'lUll 
I'miml: \ Pnulical t null 
Siilt'i;mu illni; Nnrlfjir Si 
The Di-liiiiii' CummmiiciilinnM Siilcllitt' 
I'luji'i'l Miiiuii'i'iiifiit lfi-\i(Mv; A l'i)tu'i'|>t 
'I'lit- I'l iiini'tMii It nf Army Kr.iciii'di .V Development 

DEPARTMENTS 

AlllMll I'dtlllc 





t 

5 

7 

II 



II 
III 
17 
IH 
't. 1 



i.tml yi'iii' itl tliiN ttiiu', I'liiiiloytTH lhniii)>lii)iil llu- ciMiitlry 
vvluil run bo done to hol|i llio Johk'im youtli of m\r country. 

ThntiiKli Mu lOllfi Voutli OiHHii'Iiiiiily Ciimiinijin, iirlvnd' cmpluyci'H, 
wluli 1 and luciil Htivt'rnnn'ntN avcrtt-d n crncin) yonlh nnriniiliiyitu-nl 
Ity irnividiuK uvci- tnu> milliun i-vlni Mutiniu-r work-tntiiuttK 

Tin- rluillt'iiKi- of tin- mimnu-r of l!Mil! miw fnn-H tlic naliim. It IH Jiml nn 
ini|iui'tunl iitul jnut UK prrHNtiiK HM it W M '"' yen i 1 . 

Tin- ttlnU'inviil of (he Pi'i-wiili-nt on (lu 1 MHiti Youth (h'P'irttinlty 

tll)]H')U'H 1111 



The responsibilities of the Army and the Air Koree in the con- 
trol and employment of certain types of fixed and rotary wine; air- 
craft wore set by the two Service in a joint, decision released 
April 16. 

/i'he Army will transfer its CV-2 Caribou and CV--7 liitll'alo 
aircraft to the Air Force and the Air Force will be in charge of all 
future mtra-theater fixed-win}-' tactical airlift. Oilier types of lixed 
winj? aircraft are not affected. 

Also included in the joint decision was the announcement Dial 
the Army will be responsible for all rotary winjr Miipporl for inlra- 
theatre movement, fin: support, supply and re-supply of Army 
torces and those Air Force elements working witli Ariny units In 
coordinate air support. 

_ The Air Force will rotain responsibility for rotary win):' aircraft 
involved in Air Force search and rescue and special air warfare 
missions and Air Force rotary wiiitf administrative support mis- 
sions. 

In cases of operational need, the joint or unified commander is 
authorized to attach the CV-2, OV--7 and CV.,li>;i type aircraft, to 
Army corps, division, or subordinate units in the field to perform 
supply, resupply, or troop-lift functions. 

Both Services will continue to consult on the design of follow-on 
fixed wing aircraft to assure that the Luke-nil 1 , landing and load- 
carrying characteristics meet the needs of Uie Armv i'or supply 
resupply and troop-movement functions, ' 

Joint Army/Air Force development of vertical lake-oil' and 
landing aircraft (VTOM will continue and the consideration nf 
methods of employment and control of Ibis |. V pe of aircraft will 
continue as the aircraft evolve. 

Actions required by this aM'reement will be completed by .Ian. I. 

A J I J f . 



Red Ball Express 
Again on the Move 



he fumed lied Hall Kxpress of World War II, which saw au 
endless stream of CI trucks formiuK n mobile supply line be wee 
our troops in Europe and the seaports where supplies were lam led 

is once aj^ain on the move, 

in^rTf 1 th l ! 10t , h (l "'' to'HWHMtion has changed from trucks 
LO Huge Uansport planes ol the Military Airlift Command ami the 
area o operations has been switched from Kurope to Southeast 

Despite these differences, the purpose remains tint same 

the I960 version of the ited Hall' ttxpreL,' ^VabliMhed' iV'the 
Department of Defense last December, ke< ps vilallv uecde s, pnl j " 
moving rapidly from the west coast of H,e United SI | 

t-lie^fi.pOO-milu supply route to Vietnam. "IH.MMI 

11 Ir i<le possible by th(! rapid transit mi 
JBH which allows a total time of KJH In 
" ' Vietnam until the a 



Industry hna helped to miiku the Hud Hull V, x , m ^ imnn-mn 
work by ttdopUnit iiccolorotod tochnlquoH to KM Tml i, s , 

cu " tl!1 ' M " thn b Ii 



. , , 




I'ulillMlit'd by lilt' Ui'iiai'liiii'iit 

uf UrtVntic 
linn. Knlicrl S, M<'Nfiiuani 

NtH'rHiiry tif IMViiHo 
linn. ('.mm 11. Viuici- 

l>i>l>iil.v Si-m-iiiry of lh'IYnm> 
Mini. Ai'llmr Sylvcritt'r 

Am.lMlimt Si-rn-liii'v nf 
tl'iiblii- Affiili-H) 

Ciil. .1. M. (V , nMAK 

Itiivi'lnr Cur Conuimnilv l 
Cut. Kilnin ('. i;iti:mn. UMA 

Clili'f, Hii'.iiii':,'! & Liibnr Division 



.U'dr. K. W. llrmlfnrd, UKN 

AHMHI-. I'ldifnr Mhm (Vrilln Pollute 

Anhin- . Ijilltur Mr. Ulrlt l,n l.'aU- e 

I'.tliltirjiil AmdMlnnt 

Niiiiniiii K. Wmni, J(>|, USN 

I III' I'l'fi'il:!,- linllt-lllll Ullitflill 

i'l IMliilnih.'d niniithly liy tin- IIiitiliMvui 
i^' l.fttmr hiviiiion," liifi'fh.i-^it' for 
fiiiiiniiMiily tifltifinfi!.. (Htlcr nf the 
A:;;ii[it(tnt Si-cn-liii'v "i' hi'fi'ii'.M (I'ulh 
Hi 1 AH'tiini). UIHI ni' j'liiul'i I'.ij- 
tnli' jnilijiriiliim u'iiu ;i|i|n nv.'U |.y 
I'hvrlur nl' lhi< Iliiivait ul' th.. 

'I'll'' ]tlir|m;lc nf I |n< lltli 
IM'IWCI'I) the |I.'|.|U Illl.'Hl ,,f 

( I'l i'll) ( iind it'i luilhitri.'i'il !i!;riii'li>:i 
('in! di'fVini' r.inlnirl'H'ii nnil nllli'l 1 
bllJiiiifii-i inh'ivntn, 1 1 wi|| smri'p in. 
n I'.uiilr^ hi indiiiilvy rnnri-riiiiiK "Ill- 
fin I jiiilii-it'ii. |ii'.ifrniiii!i Mini iiniji'i'tn, 
mid will !ici.|j hi Mitattliiti* tliniiKltl by 

in milvliiK (In- iinilili-itifi Ibiil may ttrlm' 
tn rnlllltiiiM Ui" I'i'iiiilrriM.-iil-i f Uii- 

Mull-Hill in liir Hull.li,, in m- 
li'i'ti'd In liiiujtly pKi'liii'-til iinrltliiiiUiril 

iimiilty. ,SuKKr:ittniiM fntiti indtttUry 
i'1'liivwiifitlivfii fin- ti>|ili'H hi lu> cnv- 
fi'i'tl in fiitiii'i' ifii.tit'H tthnultl In* fur- 
wiinlfd hi tin' lliiHiiifici & l.iilmr 
I )i\'i!i|nii, 

Tin- //it/Mm \n dlMli-ibiiti',1 wlUnmt 

l-IIHIW) i'Ufll Iltlllltlt t .-.,..,.,, 

itf IndiiMlry and to HKOiicli'H itf Out , .. 
iwrliw'iit of DofdnsM, Army, Niwy und 

All 1 I'lDTl'. Uft|UI'HlM fur rupit-M HIKttllil 

I" 1 iiddi'i'K.Mi'd (<i Uii- HiiHiui'Hu & I.nbur 
llivi.'tiim, UAH1>(I'A), Knuin V!MHl!l, 

aoitlll, Itili'phi.nr, OXfi.nl fi.i!7<)ii. 

(VintciitH (tf t)i(> niiiKii/iiw ituiy !m 
ri'pi-inttid freely without ivijuofiUiiH; 
: ' j. M)MitiiiM (if thft Himreo will 



Tiie following is President's John- 
Ron's statement -relating to the 196Ci 
Youth Opportunity Campaign: 

In 1965, faced with the alarming 
prospect of hundreds of thousands of 
young Americans 1G through 21 
looking for work in the summer and 
not finding it, this Administration 
launched a Youth Opportunity Cam- 
paign. 

If In 19fi6, we are faced with that 
prospect again. 

In 1966, 1,800,000 of our youth 
will look for work in the summer 
without finding it. 

Some of these youngsters will he 
looking for temporary summer jobs. 
But getting those jobs may be the 
difference between being able to go 
back to school or not going 1 back, 

Almost a million of them will be 
trying to find their places in life, 
trying to become independent, self- 
sufficient. 

If we fail them, it will mean that 
H we are failing our future. 

It will mean that one out of 
every six white 16- through 21-year 
olds looking for work won't find it. 

It will moan that one out of 
every five non-white youths looking 
for work will not find it. 

Finally, it will mean that we 
have allowed our youth who will rep- 
resent 14.3 percent of our country's 
summer work force to become 50 per- 
cent of our summer unemployed. 

Last month, I asked the Vice Pres- 
ident to chair a Task Force on Sum- 
mer Domestic Programs. Their rec- 
ommendations included one that there 
be a 1966 Youth Opportunity Cam- 
paign. 

I accept that recommendation. 

In 1965 y a concerted effort, partic- 
ularly by private employers large 
and small, produced a million jobs 
for our young people. Our country 
again proved its ability to respond to 
a serious situation, 

^ In 1966, we can, in my judgment, , 
increase by at least a million the 
work and training opportunities this 
summer for our boys and girls in & 
a way that is good for them and 
good business for all of us. 

The Private Employer's Role. 

I hope and believe that private em- 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



ployers, who wore largely responsible 
for our 1965 success, will exceed that 
success in i960. 

There are 620,000 firms in this 
country which employ from 10 to 100 
workers. I hope that at least half of 
these firms will agree to take on one 
extra summer trainee. 

fl There are 60,000 larger plants 
employing over 25 million people. If 
each of them will add one extra sum- 
mer trainee for each 100 employees, 
(Ins will mean another 250,000 
trainees. 

I hope other large organizations- 
labor unions, trade associations, 
churches, colleges will make a similar 
effort. This could mean another 25,000 
to 50,000 trainees. 

So this program can get started im- 
mediately, I am asking that these 
things be done: 

That all private employers who 
are disposed to do so make their own 
arrangements immediately for taking 
on one or more extra trainees this 
summer. 

If advice of this action, includ- 
ing the name of the trainee, is given 
by mail to the Secretary of Commerce, 
Youth Opportunity Campaign Unit, 
Washington, D.C., it will be appropri- 
ately acknowledged. 

That all other private employers 
and organizations who are willing to 
cooperate in this program so advise 
the nearest State Employment Office. 

That all State Employment Of- 
fices be advised, through the U.S. 
Employment Service, to establish 
special Youth Opportunity registers 
for this special summer program. 

That all boys and girls 16 through 



21 who want to work this summer and 
who don't have jobs get in touch im- 
mediately with the nearest Employ- 
ment Service Office. If this is difficult, 
write to the Department of Labor, 
Youth Opportunity Campaign Unit, 
Washington, D.C. 

The Federal Government's Role. 

I expect the Federal Government 
to do its share. 

I am again directing the Govern- 
ment departments and agencies to 
make every effort to find meaningful 
work or training opportunities this 
summer for one extra trainee for 
every 100 employees on their present 
payrolls. 

This is to he done, for the most 
part, in the field offices and installa- 
tions around the country. 

_ These opportunities will be 
given, so far as this is practicable, 
to boys and girls 16 through 21 who 
need them the most because of eco- 
nomic or educational disadvantages. 

There is a potential employment 
here of 25,000 trainees. 

Programs under the Vocational 
Education Act will be expanded from 
last year's 7,500 students to 26,000 
students this summer. 

The Work-Study program orig- 
inally planned to provide opportunity 
for 76,000 students in over 1 400 
communities will be expanded to as- 
sist 100,000 more. 

I am asking that activity under 
the Manpower Development and 
Training Act be immediately intensi- 
fied to provide training opportunities 
for at least 80,000 youth. 

(Continued on Page 12) 





by 

Charles Bonim 

Chief, Configuration Management, Persliing Project OfTice 
U.S. Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, Ala. 



The development of practical con- 
figuration management systems has 
become increasingly important to the 
U.S. Army in the control and man- 
agement of complex weapon develop- 
ment. Compressed E&D programs 
and world-wide equipment deploy- 
ment demand the timely identifica- 
tion, control and accounting of equip- 
ment configuration prior to delivery 
and during field use. 

During early production of the 
Army's Pershing missile system, a 
problem which has long faced 
weapon developers cropped up: with 
increasing quantities of equipment 
going to the field from the manufac- 
turer and with many subcontractors 
building items which ultimately 
found their way into the system, it 
was imperative that all equipment be 
delivered in strict conformance with 
engineering drawing requirements. 
Furthermore, it was necessary that 
any design changes be uniformly in- 
corporated into hardware prior to 
delivery, unless specifically planned 
for later field installation. A hit-and- 
miss procedure could play hob with 
a subsequent field modification pro- 
gram. Compounding the problem was 
the fact that, on Pershing, R&D and 
early production schedules over- 
lapped. 

The Pershing Project Manager's 
Office at the Army Missile Command, 
Redstone Arsenal, Ala., went to work 
on the knotty problem with the co- 
operation of Martin Company's Or- 
lando (Pla.) Division, prime con- 
tractor. The solution they came up 
with in October 1963, particularly in 
the realm of configuration accounting 
techniques, has proven extremely ef- 
fective and is felt to offer significant 
improvement over other methods in 
use. 

The system affected both in-house 
and breakout contractor efforts. Al- 
though many aspects of the program 
are new in concept, considerable at- 
tention has been given to integrating 
the management and control func- 
tions in a manner consistent with 



currently established Army lines of 
communication. 

The Pershing application concerns 
a complex weapon system. However, 
(.he baste building blocks urn adapt- 
able to most levels of weapons man- 
agement. Since most of the techniques 
of configuration identification and con- 
trol are relatively standard within 
the Army (Figure 1), this article will 
be limited to a description of configu- 
ration accounting techniques utili/ed 
in the Pershing program. 

The purpose of the configuration 
accounting program is to provide ac- 
curate configuration definition and 
information retrieval for items of 
equipment through all phases of de- 
sign, development, production and 
operational service life. The accurate 
and timely availability of such infor- 
mation is a management tool in addi- 
tion to the obvious technical benefits 
provided. In conjunction with a con- 
trolled field modification program, the 
availability of equipment for its tac- 
tical mission is not jeopardised be- 
cause of configuration incompatibil- 
ities. 

Basic elements of the computer 
mechanized system are baseline con- 
trol, change accountability and con- 
figuration records. 

Baseline Control. With increased 
emphasis on fixed price contracting, 

the requirement for configuration 



definition has bi'como a [ufce.ssi ty. 
Identification of all elements of tin 1 
technical data package describing the 
items must ho detailed, inclmli UK the 
appropriate change levels. During the 
performance under the contract all 
necessary changes must, lie identified 
as supplemental to the contract di-ii- 
nition find appropriate cert Hind inn 
established to assure their irirorpont- 
tion prior to equipment delivery. In 
order for a Held modi Heat ion pni- 
tfram to he effective, equipment must 
be delivered in strict confornmne-c' with 
previously planned conlUvimilion re- 
quirements. The I'ersluiiK wyiUem 
identifies the contract configuration 
and authorizes changes and rcHillt-n- 
tion of accomplishment prior l.n (iov- 
ernmcnt acceptance of the equipment, 
Change Account abilily. The ['haiie.'e 
accountability tab run (Figure '>.) re- 
quires a manufacturing wnrk urea tit 
accomplish an authorized chain;' 1 . 
The requirement details Ihu p;irt num- 
ber affected, equipment item and 
effect! vity and appropriate i-lianw* 
level to he incorporated. Updated and 
issued daily to affected work nri'iDi, 
the tab run sho\vs each ontKdtiitlintf 
change action. A roqui return I H'- 
mains open until cortilli'd by Quality 
and Army Ordnance limpnt-Ufm, 
through the URO oC a Conflnim- 
tion Accountability Transmittul Card 
(Figiu'c H), that the work IIHH biu'n 
accomplished. The completed triuin- 
action is then stored in computer 
memory until prior to delivery when 
"as-built" information is required for 
configuration records. In additiiui, an 
serialized items are inntalli-cl in 
higher level assemblies, rnmptiitlon 
accountability trannniitlals arc* for- 
worded to Configuration Manage- 
ment to show actual configurntiini 
and serial munlwrti of lower level j 
items installed in major equipment, 



Configuration 
Identification 


Configuration 
Control 


Configuration 
Accounting 


Specifications 
Drawings 
Documentation Policy 
and Procedures 
Serialization 
Traceability 
Quality Assurance 


Change Review and 
Planning 
Change Authoriza- 
tion 
Systems Change 
Board 


ttasollno Control 
Mochnimod Clmiiffo 
Accountability 
(Prime Contractor) 
Mccha nixed ConflRurnLinn 
Record (Prime and 
Breakout Contrnctorfi) 


Special Acceptance 
Inspection Equipment 
Packaging Data Sheets 




Mechanized Field 
Configuration Record 
Configuration Account- 
ability Transmittala 



Figure 1. 



May 1966 




ACCOUNTABILITY 



ITEM 6 

EFFECTIVITY S 




T COMPLETION 



CERTIFICATION 
ENGINEERING 1 



'CHANGED ORDER - 
* LEVEL ] 



PART 
.NUMBER !; 



?. II 
2! if | 

"i"! 



!. FIGURE 2 !r?" 



CONFIGURATION ACCOUNTABILITY TRANSMITTAL 



I A, G 



J8.A.P 



HEl'AIHER ASSEMBLY 




IN HOUSE CAT. CARD 

BREAKOUT -COMPLETION ACCOUNTAfllLITV 



c*no 1 OP 1 



M. C. DOLLIHGBR, Chief. AHXSL-KH 




BREAKOUT CAT. CARD 
Figure 3. 



Confi guration Records. Confign ra- 
tion records define the engineering 
requirements and certify that equip- 
ment has been built to the proper 
contract and engineering- definition. 
An example of a configuration record 
utilized for initial delivery of equip- 
ment is shown in Figure 4 (see inside 
back cover), The "as-engineered" 
portion of the record details the part 
numbers, quantities, effect ivity, con- 
tract baseline and required cban&'o 
level. The as-built portion of the rec- 
ord details the actual fabricated con- 
figuration, including- the incorporation 
of changes released subsequent to con- 
tract baselining and the serial num- 
bers of lower level steins installed in 
major equipment. As-built certifica- 
tion is accomplished through a Con- 
figuration Accountability Transmitta! 
(CAT. Card) as shown In Figure 4. 
This is completed by tho contractor's 
manufacturing organization and cer- 
tified by Quality Assurance and Pro- 
curement Inspection personnel. 

Breakout Configuration Records. 

Breakout contracting; presented n sig- 
nificant management problem in that 
the prime contractor originatcil En- 
gineering Change Packages affecting: 
equipment fabricated in another sec- 
tion of the country by a breakout 
contractor. For this purpose the basic 
configuration record system \vas fur- 
ther refined to a Breakout Configur- 
ation Record system. In general, a 
breakout contract definition is aub- 
stituted for the as-built portion of 
the basic configuration record. Tims, 
the exact difference between tho tech- 
nical definition of the equipment at 
the prime contractor and tho break- 
out contract definition is apparent at 
all times. In order to assure that 
changes released by the prime con- 
tractor are incorporated into the 
breakout contract, the Configuration 
Accountability Transmittal (Figure 
3 ) is forwarded to tho cognizant 
Army Procurement District with the 
Engineering Change Package. When 
the change is negotiated into the 
breakout contract, the Procurement 
District notes the negotiated effoc- 
tivity and forwards the curd back to 
the prime contractor to update tho 
breakout configuration record. In the 
event that the negotiated cfToctivity 
differs from that documented and re- 
quested, then appropriate action (re- 
engineering, etc.) can be accom- 
plished early enough in the program 
to avoid equipment and field madifi- 
(Continued Inside Duck Cover} 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



by 
Col. Ralph S. Carman, USAF 



Of all the Free World responsibili- 
ties the United States has assumed 
since 19-15, none has been of more 
importance than the nuclear deter- 
rence to all-out war. 

Today, more than 20 years since the 
atomic ago began, nuclear deterrence 
continues to provide the shield behind 
which free men can work and build 
for peace. 

Tiie success of our nuclear deter- 
rence has resulted from an unfaltering 
national will to preserve peace and 
deny victory to any aggressor. It has 
also resulted from a dynamic, imagi- 
native, well-supported technology 
which has provided weapons and 
knowledge to give the United States 
unquestioned superiority in nuclear 
firepower. 

In spite of the restrictions imposed 
by the limited nuclear test ban treaty, 
which requires that testing can be 
conducted only underground, the De- 
partment of Defense, Atomic Energy 
Commission and industry have con- 
tinued to upgrade weapons capabili- 
ties, to improve the survivability of 
weapon systems, and to advance nu- 
clear know-how on many fronts. 

The Air Force Special Weapons 
Center, which is a part of the Air 
Force Systems Command, is a long- 
time member of the military-civilian 
team charged with applying advancing 
nuclear technology to national secur- 
ity needs. 

Located at Kirtland AFB, Albu- 
querque, N.M., the Special Weapons 
Center is a next-door neighbor to the 
Defense Atomic Support Agency's 
Field Command, the Atomic Energy 
Commission's Albuquerque Operations 
Office, and Sandia Corp., an AEG 
prime weapons contractor. The Los 
Alamos Scientific Laboratory is about 
70 miles to the north. 

The Special Weapons Center has a 
hand m supporting all of the national 
safeguards under the nuclear test ban 
treaty. Briefly, the safeguards require; 

The conduct of underground nu- 
clear weapons test programs. 

Maintenance of modern nuclear 
lab facilities and programs. 

Maintenance of facilities and re- 
sources necessary to initiate prompt 
nuclear tests in the atmosphere and 



other environments should they ever 
be required. 

Improvements of the capability to 
monitor the terms of the treaty and to 
detect violations. 

When Secretary of Defense Robert 
S. MeNamara testified in favor of the 
test ban treaty before the Senate For- 
eign Relations Committee in the sum- 
mer of 1963, he promised that the 
United States would maintain the vi- 
tality of our weapons laboratories, 
would continue to conduct a program 
of underground tests, and would re- 
tain the administrative talent and 
other resources required for quick 
expansion of the test program into 
additional environments, 1 

Each one of these promises has been 
kept. 

It is firm national policy to retain a 
readiness-to-test capability in every 
relevant environment, and to support 
a dynamic technology in weaponry, 
nuclear effects research, systems sur- 
vivability, and test detection and 
analysis. It is also national policy to 
make certain that we maintain what 
Secretary MeNamara has called "a 

1 Secretary of Defense MeNamara' a 
statement upholding tho nuclear test 
ban treaty, Aug. 13, 1963, Senate For- 
eign Relations Committee. 




Col. Ralph S. Carman, USAF. is tho 
Commander of the Air Force Special 
Weapons Center of the Air Force Sys 

C r mand - Prior to t!li * assign- 
he commanded the Air Force 

Center ' An A 
his research 



2PM 



strong deterrent to abrogation" of tli 
test ban treaty and, through all aval 
able means, to render the risk < 
abrogation minimal. a 

An important part of the U.f 
capability to resume atmoapheri 
testing on short notice is based o 
an airborne diagnostic technique fir* 
successfully demonstrated during tli 
later phases of Operation Doivrinit 
our last series of in-tlie-air tests con 
ducted in l!)02. :i This teciliniijuo 
which frees atmospheric testing frun 
land-based instrumentation resniltfn 
from the Special Weapons Center 1 ! 
development of extremely aceumti 
airborne distance measuring equip' 
ment which made it possible to per 
form diagnostics of atmospheric Lents 
from an airborne array without I'TOiim' 
support. This development provides n 
simultaneous, slant range measure- 
ment of distances between all aimral'l 
in the tent array and the nuclear de- 
vice, as well as tho dtatnnca between 
aircraft. 

Heart of the test array consists of 
Special Weapons Center H-B2 drop air- 
craft and three N0-18fi diagnostic! 
aircraft flown by thu center and instru- 
mented by the Atomic Kncrtfy Com- 
mission's throe weapons laboratories 
Los Alamos, Sandia and Lnwroneii. 
In the autumns of liHM nnd l\m, 
full-scale exercises wore NUCHOHH Cully 
conducted in the Pacific by the Defense 
Atomic Support Agency's Joint Tush 
Force Eight to proof-test the airborne 
diagnostic capability and to provide 
realistic training for some 1,500 De- 
fense Department, Atomic Knergy 
Commission and contractor purHonnol. 
The exercises involved dropping in- 
strumented tost simulation objects 
from tho H-52'H while tho throe NO- 
185's simulated gathering nuclear di- 
agnostic data. 

In addition to planning for Air 
Force support of resumed atmospheric 
tests and maintaining the basic air 
array for nuclear test readiness, the 
Special Weapons Center provides nir 
support of underground tests of nu- 
clear weapons and detection tech- 
niques. It maintains a detachment in 
Nevada which furnishes and coordi- 
nates all atomic tost site aerial activi- 
ties there. 

The center furnished airborne sup- 
port of the 1965 underground detonn- 
tion on Amchitka Island in the Aleu- 
tians which helped scientists in their 
2 Ibid, 

Report to Conffrcss for 



(Continued on Pago 



May 1966 




The Defense Department has been 
heavily engaged for several years in 
activities related to a satellite com- 
munications system. The Department 
expects to realize an initial limited 
satellite communications capability in 
the very near future with the Initial 
Defense Communications Satellite 
System. 

DOD has certain unique require- 
ments which can best be met by a 
satellite communications system. As 
early as 1958, the Defense Depart- 
ment's first experiment in satellite 
communications was made with the 
launching of Score by the Army Sig- 
nal Research and Development Lab- 
oratory. Sent into orbit by the Air 
Force in December of that year, this 
satellite had a life of 12 days but in 
that time demonstrated real time relay 
of voice, code and teletype messages. 
In 1960 the Army and the Air Force 
collaborated again to put up Courier, a 
rather complex experiment. During 
its 18-day life, Courier received and 
re-transmitted 118,000,000 words. 

In I960 the Secretary of Defense 
combined all DOD satellite communi- 
cations efforts under the U.S. Army 
Advent Management Agency. How- 
ever, by 1962, it was found that the 
Advent concept of a large synchro- 
nous satellite launched by the pro- 
posed Centaur booster stretched the 
state of the art. The project; waa 
wisely cancelled. 

The efforts of NASA with the Belay 
series and the Bell System with the 
Telstar series has further increased 
DOD confidence in achieving satellite 
communications for military usage. In 
1962, the Secretary of Defense estab- 
lished the Defense Communications 
Satellite Program (DCSP) and as- 
signed to the Defenso Communica- 
tmns Agency the responsibility for 
integration of its ground and space 
efforts. 

By October 1964, DCSP project 
definition studies were completed with 
the proposal for a medium altitude, 
random, polar orbit system with the 
Atlas/Agena booster. Each booster 
was to place seven satellites in orbit 
and there were to be four launchings. 



Lt. Gen. Alfred D. Starbird, USA 
Director, Defense Communications Agency 



The military has peculiar strin- 
gent demands for survivability, relia- 
bility, flexibility and ability to move 
rapidly into remote areas. Its require- 
ment is for a limited number of cir- 
cuits to reach any point, but assured 
ones. 

As the Communications Satellite 
Corporation was being established 
and as its organization evolved, how- 
over, it became apparent that the 
capability of the ComSat Corporation 
to provide national security communi- 
cations should be investigated. After 
extensive discussions and joint studies 
with the ComSat Corporation from 
October 1963 to July 15, 1964, the 
Secretary of Defense concluded that 
the DOD must proceed with its own 
system to meet certain DOD needs. 

^ During the period of study, the 
Titan III-C program had developed 
to a point where certain scheduled 
development launches could be used to 
launch DOD It&D satellites. Studies 
indicated that, for the initial research 
and development system, DOD could 
use Titan III-C to carry eight satel- 
lites into circular orbit in an equa- 
torial plane at near-synchronous alti- 
tudes. Consequently, DOD decided 
to establish its initial defense com- 



munications satellites in a random 
equatorial pattern at an altitude of 
18,250 miles. 

By this time, also, DOD had estab- 
lished the satellite as a 32-inch poly- 
hedron, with 32 watts of silicon solar 
cell power, receiving in the 8,000 
megacycle and transmitting in the 
7,000 megacycle bands. The satellite 
would radiate approximately three 
watts in a toroidal pattern and would 
have no control system. 

Three Titan III-C launches in early 
1966 are planned, each carrying up 
to eight satellites to a near-synchro- 
nous altitude. Each satellite will be 
dispensed at a different velocity which 
will cause separation at rates of four 
degrees per day. Satellites will be 
spin stabilized at 160 RPM. A mean- 
time-before-failure of one and one- 
half years or better is expected. 

Transportable ground terminals 
employing 40-foot parabolic antennas 
are now being deployed to sites 
around the world. Our older 60-foot 
terminals at Fort Dix, N.J., and 
Camp Roberts, Calif., are being read- 
ied. Late this year a smaller trans- 
portable terminal will be added one 
capable of very rapid installation and 
use in contingency/crisis situations. 
During the initial DCSP develop- 
ment, invaluable experience was 
gained participating with NASA in 
the Syncom project. NASA orbited 
Syncoms II and III. They are now 
stationed at 70 Bast and 165 East 
Longitude, respectively. DOD pro- 

(Continued on Page 8) 



SfM 




SOLAR PANELS 



STIFFENER 

TRAVELING WAVE 
TUBE AMPLIFIER 



EQUIPMENT MOUNTING 
PANEL 



SPIN NOZZLE 

TELEMETRY ANTENNA 



WAVEGUIDE COAX SWITCH 



DOWN CONVERTER 
MIXEJ1 PflE-rtMP 



IF AMPLIFIER 
XII MULTIPLIER 

N 3 SPIN-UP BOTTLE 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Li Gen. Andrew .1. Gondpawler, 
USA, IKIH lii;on named to rolievi' Lt. 
Gn. David A. Hurcliinal, USAI 1 ', as 
Dii'. of tlio Joint Staff, Joint Clmifn 
of Staff. 

Frederick S. Wylo lias hcon sworn 
in as l)t!p. A.sst, Secretary for Policy 
Planning in the (Illicit ol' the Afi.sl. 
Secretary of DofeiiHo (lnlnrnal.innal 
Security Affairs). 

'I'wo dwnK'flH took place in the Ol 1 -- 
fu:o of UHI Atist. Secretary of Defennc 
( Comptroller) in April, .Iiptwpli S. 
Hoover W:IK .sworn in on April i!0 ati 
Principal ])(!}). Awst Secretary and 
George W. Ber(|iii.HL nsmimcil I In; 
position of Hep. Awit. Hi'rretary ol' 
Dofo.nHO (Management Syntonisi' Do- 
volopmont) on April 15. 

KiFoiilivo .Inly I, UNili, Mai. (ion. 
Arlluir Vf. Oherheclt, USA, will laid! 
command of Joint Tank l''orce 
Eight, (i mihordinato command of 
the; Defi'iiKo Atomic Support Agency. 
Hn will succeed Muj. (Ji-n. John D. 
Stevenson, USAF. 

Di'. Stephen .1. Luka-sik ha.s (men 
appointed Dii-. of Nuclear Tout .De- 
tection .for tlio Advanced He.iearch 
Projects Apfuncy, 

Maj. fien. JaincH (',. Slu-rrill. US- 
AK, hau IH-HM aHftiu'iied to duly a:i 
Knocial AsMt. for HtraU'Rir Mohilily 
with tint Joint (!hi<;fn of SlnlV. 

Hriff. (Jon. Paul W. TlhhelH, Jr., 
USAF, Iiaa heon named Dcp. Coin- 
immddr for Management and Syn- 
toms, Military Truffle MaimKeino.nl. 
und Terminal Service. 

KArtm. Wiimlon II. Schleeir, UKN, 
will taki! command of Uie Dofciuir 
Puol Supply Contor. Aloxandrin, Vii., 
m Juno, H miminds 1,1. (fen, W. 0. 
Senior, USAF, who IH rotlrlim. 

(lol. ThnmiiH I,. I''inlicr, IISAK, hint 
boon wmsHlffiiod as Aunt, U> tlio Dlr,, 
Policy Plannlnff Stud' Ofllco of Urn 
AHHt. SoBi-otniy of Itetonso (Inti^r- 
nationnl Security Airnlrfl). 

Cupl. (i. 0. Iloffiior, l/SN, luiK 1i(!i>n 
doHiffniitnd an rnn]HHttor (tntiitnil for 
tint Dofonso Supply Agency, Alcs- 
mulrm, Va. IJn will iiHHiinii* tin* noiti- 




Iti'scarrli and Di'Vi'lnptnciit, Army 
Miili'i'ii-l ( !i tin nun u I, rHVH \\-i- , I in u- I 

('ol. ^'illiuin M. iMiml/, li:i:i a:; 
jiiiiin'd roinintind of lln< Ai'iny Niilir-l\ 
Iiahoralnriivt in i\l:is:;ai'lni:ti'( Is. ( 'ul, 
Maul'/, wini cuiiK'.s (<> \\\<- iis:>ij;Mtiu L iil 
from duly as OnmiiKiiuliiij'. Ollif't', 
Sii|)|io]| Huinniainl, Alaidta, luis nl.'.u 
Keen iioiiiinah'd I'm' |ii'i)iin>l inn |n 
lirii-adii'r n'cncral. 

Col. Miles ],. WiH'lii'iidorl will ,'iih' 
ci'cd ('ol. Curlin \\ r . Cluipiiiini, Jr., a; 
Kxci'iilivi 1 lo I lie Ariny I'liii't nf I'iu 
H'iin'cr.'i, \Vasliiii)',liin, Jl.C., Auc, lii. 

M. Col. Harold \V, Vonnt, l'i .ir,! 
Manii|;'ci' for Kifli'-i a I lli'iHiuiiiu'ln'.i, 
Army Wi'apniiM ( 'oininiiiul, Itm-li In 
land, ill., linn lu'cn in'uiudlnl in ni]um<l 

1.1. t'ol. Williiiin .1. McClniu hir. 
lii'rn as.'iiifiu'd (o Ilic Ai'tny Alifij.ilt' 
Sii|)|)ui't f 'nimiiaiiil ii: i l h ii)\-n;,l .Mar 
filial fur lii'iliitnni' Ai-jsi-nal, Alii, 

LI. Col, Harold 1C. Shaw lm.<; IHTH 
nanird Cinnniiiiidi'r, Army Nurli-ar 
Di'l'i'ii.'ii' 1 .11 1 11 1 rn t.( ry. Mtlni'w ..... I Ar 
Hdiiil, Mil, I'!i|wju II, Hoiiloit wn.-i 
nt'tiiiff 'IVrlminil Diccfifif nf 



tiou In July fuuicoedlnir Col. TH 

I. Martin, USA. who will he, 

UmmaiHlov, Dofonsu Depot, Mem- 
phis, Tnn. 

t Two Dttfoiwo Contract AdniiniHlra- 
tion horviccH RoRloiiH have new di-- 
rcctora. Col. Lnron I>. Miimiy, USAF, 
sticcecdH dipt. Kichnrd 1). White, 
USN, at Atlanta, Ga., and Cant. W. 
Glenn Normlle, USN, HiiCRocdH Col. 
Clmrlcs P. Hurley, USAF, fl t Dallas, 

i l-A i 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

MnJ. Gen. WilHnm C. Gi-lhblo, 1m- 
cumo Dop. Chief of Kofloarch und 
Dovolopmont, at Ha, Dopm-tmont of 
the Army, in April, 

Command of the Desert Tcwt Con- 
tor, Sat Lako City, Utah, wna im- 
aumod by Brig. Gen, John J. Hnyoa 
In another clmngo last month. 

Brig. (Jen Richard II. Free ha 
been assigned to duty us Dop. DIr., 



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

(ii'oriii 1 \'. Shai'fi'r hii;i In'i'ii Miun.'d 
In Inad llu 1 H.H, Naval ()i-r-aiiu(ri-n]i|iir 

!Hlli'l'';i Wi'lil Cuaiit llrlarlniu-lil 
Wllirli will lit- Ini-iilrd n| I'tunl | (ll nia, 
Cidif. "I'll" nr-\v dclai'litiH'iil \vlll u.-i 
an Haiiion l)i*l,wi<i>n (Juvcnuni'til, n\',*'n 
rii'.'i, non (lovo-iitni'iil isrii-nlilli- n.-l'i\i 
lit- 1 and Ilic Nnvil itri-aiioj-rai-liir 
Iniadimarioi-ti In WnnliliiKlon, D.C., 
In addition !.,i ils n^nlur tcrlinlnil 
and lii'imllnV imppui'i nilunluii, 

UAdm. Kraidi t!. .loncn will IIP i,- 
lii'vi'd in July l, y <!,(. siitart C. 
'N, a>< Coniiillllldi'i', Motion Naval 
l. Thi' new ...... mmintiT hi tn.\v 

I'l'oilurliiui OfflcMi-. 
n Naval Shipyard. 
Hrlff. (Jim. l-'ranh R (iariTisnn hn<i 
lioi'ii nniucd Mai-lno (,'ui'im lHi<Ttnr 
ol Infonnaliiiii, {{CM, (iarivhum hil-n 
itvtT from C|. i> m ,| M. Morlarty. 
) v *' '"Hi' I ...... i inlcriin Ilim-h,]' , ( f 

Inronnalion ninn' (he dHiirliim<nf ,.f 
HrlK. ({en. A. II. AduniH liuil, Ki'lini- 
iiry. Col, Moriarly will In- (i,-n, t!,u- 
n'tiion u deputy. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

The followiiiK fuinied oflli-ern will 
l! itiUml in tin grade of KtMHTtil tin 
dittcH indii-atdil: 

Gun. Ijeninnl A. Hclirlovcr, (!nm- 
mandiii'. Air Koire Kyutoms Conimaiid, 

Qcn, Itobcrt M. Lee, Air Dun to 
Supronn) Alltod Coninimid.^-, I'luropt., 
July iJl, 



(Jni. Jiiroli M. .Hniarl, DI-JI. Con,. 

mandrr in ('lit. -I', |t.;;, Kiirnpcan 
* 'oiiiinaii'l, July .'II . 

Tlic fnllmviiiK ilir.'.- nllli-cr;! have 
liren iiuniiiuilnl f,ir iii'miml i.ui In ir (!]l . 
(MM! anil itnined In viilnc.- ||,,- ali'ovc* 
I'l-lirhi); nlllrt-rji mi iniliralnl ilaleii. 

Ll. lien. Will in m S. Stone, Air 
D.-p, In Snpivi.ir Alllnl I \nniniintirr 
Kiir.i|ii', :-ir|i|. I. ' 

LI- C.i-n. .liuur-t l''f|-);ti'ioii. Coin- 
MiiLlitti'l 1 , Ail' l''mvc Sy;.|i-iii:. ( 'olumaml, 
'il'pl , I , 

I.I. (ini. Dnvlit A. Uniflilnal. Dep. 
( '.niliiiainl.'r in I'liii-t'. I M;, Miii-oprjiii 
I'.iiiiiiiantl, A lit;'. I. 

.Maj. lien. L.'l t: lilon 1. Ihniii, ]i a! , 



, 

A ir I'ni'i-c ;;\ ::li-in i I '.iniin:uiil. fur 
Clolml Kail,;-. 

ttiii;, Cm. Chtirli", II. Koii.lmmi in 

l)i<- ii.'iv i 'niiuiiainli-r .,|' llu- A.'i'.'apiice 

.M.'di.'iii hu-., Ai'':;i', MI,M,I,.I ,\KM, 

' l ' 1 "' 'I.' i.-lii-v,-;. Ilijf-. (;,.. 'I'lmtaiiH 
II. Cinnrli, 

Cul. liilliril L. dull'. Itiri lit'i'ii 

;l:.'.i);|l'.| 11 . ( 'nllllniill.tr]- ,>| | |,,. '.IfilHIll 

Air Ha:i.' (HMIIP, Air |' % ..i,'i- L.pf.l!,||,>!i 
I ' xitni.'unl, N, ut. -n A I'll, Cjilif, 

Col. |>a\|it M, lttui;'i h:i:i ln-cit 
iiaini'd Iiu',. CiMiiini .'iiij.iM.il, Air Kinvi 1 
Myiil-'inii Cniiiimin.i. \vlHi Klllcivi in Hi,. 
l''''il''i.il Hill,-,. lluil.liMH. Wii'.hlniMiin 
li.i' 

Col. U llh, mi I'. |),,||iv J,ti-i tii<i>ii 
ii.un.'.l Mir. Ci\H I'liifj'i'frrini;. A I-'.NC 
Air Konv Wr..,|,,ni iVi.l |{nn,r ( . Van' 

'Irllhi'M; -\K|| t CiiUt'. 

Col, Jolin T. Hly, Jm-i l,,-,'ii r ,'aii 

: "M'"''I " rv A'.'.l. Hi'|i. I'M,' itiMlllltil.il 

\\ iirljii.- Siiiiiiuil. l-'oivl^n 'IVrhmd- 
"i;v Miv., AK'ir, Wrliihi I'lill-rwHi 
M-'ll. iitiin. 
Tli" n.-\v Hli- ( If, ,..,,}! |'i- M |;raiiiii, 

lllll.'n of ArTn;lj.il'H KI'::"| .'l|, (M Co|, 

HtiliiTt I-:. Hnillh. 



Navy Collocates 

Ocoanographic 

R & D Groups 

'I lin-r Navy h ^ItiiMlM^lrfil 
IMIVI- |II',>K ni||Mi<ii|.| iu tin* Nuvnl Ite- 



, 

In Hi,. MMIV.* v.no NKJ/H 
ilt-.f (In-;. ii ,'iri'-n,'i* iui(l 



.jH.'ni'i' Mini I'ltiKiii'-'-ilitK IMvirtimi und 
Hie Ui-'i.'ai.'li mil] niTV'|..).iiM-llt Hi'- 
p:ii|ril"iu uf Hie NitVHl llmiitHKiii|thli! 



iKlt the Hut'.' Hnitiiiri will lit) 
wm'!iin K luKrdinr. ili,-y will each HI- 
imt ii iiii.|'i- hrhiilnil Mi|irrvfK{<iii of 
tlii'lr HUH rem-iiivti i!ijr.'|,tr, 

The v.-ntiirt' will imividn IncicaHNl 

t'tlU'jt'Hry in iH'.itii"unL('liii 1 tvneiu-clt 

dm- t" tin- t'M'ell.'nt, lidtMi-iilory fiioilU 

n-?j rivftUtiltlt- in Hi.- N'uvnl U^'^iiTh 

l-tilMiritlttry HIM! rti>tit*r working tlt% 

Hi-, ,l, HracKi'H Ilcrscy, whu hn " 
mventi.,1 ti|i|ioliitini>nt HjHTlnl Aw- 
fur Ot'i-iuin^ntphy ( ih< AH- 
Sif ivtury f th' Nnvy (U(- 
uru! IMwHn|tin.mt). will be Iho 
director of tho cwcanoK-rRphlc group. 



May 19W 




The concept of project manage- 
ment continues to flourish in the 
Navy Department. Since the creation 
of the Naval Material Support 
Establishment (NMSE) in December 
1963, which placed the Navy Material 
Bureaus under one head, i.e., the 
Chief of Naval Material, 27 efforts 
have been designated for exceptional 
or "project" management. This in- 
cludes nine projects whose managers 
report to the Chief of Naval Mate- 
rial and 18 projects whose managers 
report to the material bureau 
chiefs, Priorities, size, complexity, 
interface relationships and relative 
importance generally determine to 
whom the project manager will re- 
port. 

By reason of the increased, imple- 
mentation of project management 
within the Naval Material Support 
Establishment, Vice Admiral I. J. 
Galantin, the Chief of Naval Mate- 
rial, is talcing stops to assure him- 
self that the 'disciplines, procedures 
and methods of project management 
are vigorously exercised. For ex- 
ample, two pilot tests have recently 
been completed of a procedure which 
has been called "Project Management 
Review." This concept consists of the 
designation of a team, called the 
Project Management Review Team, 
whose assignment is primarily to in- 
quire into the effectiveness of the 
management of a project. Addition- 
ally, the team inquires into the de- 
gree to which the project's program 
objectives have been accomplished. 
Incident to the latter, observations 
will be made by the team as to when 
a project ought to be phased down or 
disestablished. 

The two pilot tests have been so 
successful that Admiral Galantin has 
made the decision to implement this 
concept on a permanent basis. Im- 
plementing instructions, at the time 
of this writing, have been prepared 
and are in the process of approval 
and distribution. Implementation and 
administration of the project review 
procedure have been assigned to the 
Plans Division, Project Management 
Branch (Code MAT 111), Office of 
Naval Material, Navy Department, 
Washington, D.C. 

The ultimate success of the re- 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



George W. Bergqiiist 



views is recognized to be substan- 
tially dependent on the experience, 
knowledge and objectivity of the 
team. For this reason careful atten- 
tion will be paid to the qualifications 
of persons designated as Project 
Management Review Team members. 
Implementing instructions assure 
that the Project Management 
Branch, Plans Division, Office of 
Naval Material, provides permanent 
team leadership and has at least one 
member on each review team. This 
organization specializes in the imple- 
mentation of the concepts and poli- 
cies of project management through- 
out the total Naval Material Support 
Establishment. Its members are 
graduates of the Defense Weapons 
System Management Course, a three- 
month Department of Defense course 
in project management given at 
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. Mem- 
bers, in many instances, have hud 
substantial, actual experience in 
project management organizations. 
Functional specialists from other or- 
ganizations of the 001ce of Naval 
Material may be called on to serve 
cither as full- or part-time members 
of the Project Management Review 
Team, depending on the sine of the 
project, its complexity and the type 
of problems anticipated. The project 




Mr. George W. Bergquist is the 
newly appointed Dep. Asst. Secretary 
of Defense (Management Systems De- 
velopment). At the time this article 
was written he was Dep, Chief of 
Naval Material for Programs and 
Financial Management. Mr. Bcrgquist 
is a graduate of Harvard University 
and has a Masters Degree in Public 
Administration. 



manager is expected to designate one 
individual from his staff to act as a 
central point of contact during the 
reviews. The project manager him- 
self is encouraged to participate to 
the maximum degree possible. 

To ensure the adequacy of reviews, 
a check list has been devised for use 
by the review team. Also, a question- 
naire is forwarded to the project 
manager in advance of the review to 
which he is expected to respond. The 
major divisions of the check list are: 

Authority and responsibility of 
the project manager. 

8 Project charter. 

Program identification. 

Project priority. 

8 Dollar size and complexity. 
Qualification for project manage- 
ment. 

Project history. 

Project visibility. 

o Project staffing. 

Communications channels, 

Reporting. 

Project status reviews and eval- 
uation. 

Management information sys- 
tems. 

Financial management. 

Planning, 

Technical direction and imple- 
mentation of DOD directives. 

Each of the foregoing major divi- 
sions is subdivided so that there are 
approximately 150 specific questions 
in the check list. 

The questionnaire requires the 
project manager to respond to about 
18 questions on control, authority 
and responsibility. Additional infor- 
mation is required concerning the 
support that the project manager 
receives from material bureaus and 
Naval field activities. 

The intent is to conduct the re- 
views with the least possible disrup- 
tion to the operations of the project 
organization. At the conclusion of the 
review, the team presents its inde- 
pendent findings, conclusions and rec- 
ommendations to the project man- 
agers, the Chief of Naval Material, 
and, if the project reviewed is at 
the bureau level, the chief of the 
bureau to whom the project manager 
reports. The project manager may or 
may not concur with the findings of 
the team. If he does not, his reasons 
may be stated during briefings, Inso- 
far as possible, the team is expected 
to resolve controversial areas before 
the final briefing to top management. 

The findings, conclusions and rec- 



omniemhitions of tlie review team are 
formalized in a final report to which 
the project manager may attach an 
addendum if he chooses to nonconcur 
with any of the conclusions or rec- 
ommendations of the team. 

It is planned to make wide distri- 
bution of the findings of each review. 
Cross-fertilization of ideas is a 
primary objective, and this cross- 
fertilization is expected to contribute 
substantially to the overall under- 
standing of project management con- 
cepts, policies, procedures and prob- 
lems throughout the NMSE. 

The Instrumentation Ships Project 
(PM-5), under Captain A. F. Han- 
cock, USN, was the first project 
selected for pilot test of the concept. 
It was chosen for its relatively small 
size and also because of its depend- 
ence on the Bureau of Ships to pro- 
vide support in areas such as pro- 
curement, engineering services and 
administrative matters. 

The project had been established 
at the direction of DOD as part of 
the objective to centralize the man- 
agement of all DOD activities in sup- 
port of the National Range Program. 
PM-5, though small, is complex, 
since its business is conducted with 
agencies outside the Navy, princi- 
pally with the range activities of 
the Air Force and the National Aero- 
nautics and Space Administration 
(NASA). The assignment of the proj- 
ect manager is to fulfill the Navy's 
responsibility for the construction, 
conversion and modification of all 
general purpose instrumentation 
ships in support of DOD and NASA 
world-wide tracking requirements. 
This includes the instrumentation 
ships in support of NASA's Apollo 
Program. 

The results of the Project Man- 
ag-ement Review of the Instrumenta- 
tion Ships (PM-5) Project are con- 
sidered to be both significant and 
useful. For example, the review 
served to confirm: 

That the concept of using exist- 
ing Navy bureaus to support the 
project is sound. 

The need for the project man- 
ager's careful execution of formal, 
explicit, interface agreements when 
two or more DOD components and 
outside agencies are engaged in re- 
lated work. 

The fact that the Project Man- 
agement Review provides the project 
manager with an incentive to iden- 
tify his "managerial" problems and, to 



bring them to the attention of higher 
authority if such assistance is 
needed. 

o The neeri for "closed-loop" com- 
munications between the project 
manager and those to whom lie is 
responsible. 

In addition to the four major con- 
clusions above, a number of specific 
administrative and procedural areas 
for improvement were identified, and 
corrective action has been taken. 

Recognizing the rather unique 
character of the Instrumentation 
Ships Project, the decision was made 
to test the concept further by apply- 
ing it to a more conventional all- 
Navy project, Accordingly, the next 
project selected for review was the 
All-Weather Carrier Landing Sys- 
tem Project (PM-G) under Captain 
F. R. Fearnow, USN. This project 
has for its objective the development 
of an all-weather aircraft/carrier 
landing system oriented toward fixed 
wing aircraft. 

Again, the proposed check list and 
project manager's questionnaire were 
applied to this project. As in the 
case of the review of the Instrumen- 
tation Ships Project, the check list 
and questionnaire proved to be useful 
guides in ensuring the desired cover- 
age. At the completion of the review 
some significant observations were 
made, principally bearing on the im- 
portance of control of funds and con- 
tracting, for successful project man- 
agement. 

Project managers have, in general, 
welcomed the idea of the reviews. 
For example, one project manager 
commented that the check list would 
provide him with a helpful self check. 
There will be no contacts with in- 
dustry during the reviews. The re- 
viewers will, however, be inquiring 
into areas relating to the project 
manager's administration of con- 
tracts with industry, the kinds and 
frequency of reporting required of 
industry and other related factors 
It is conceivable that the concept 
could be extended to include occa- 
sional visits to contractors' plants 
but this is not planned at present. 

The current schedule calls for six 
additional reviews to be conducted 
during this calendar year, 

Experience to date has demon- 
strated that the project review con- 
cept is a useful and effective man- 
agement tool from the standpoint of 
p Navy management as well as the 
individual project manager. 



Dofonso Communications Sotollilo Programs 

(Contimmd from l } iif/a 5) 
vided the ground terminals now em- 
placed in Hawaii, the Philippines, 
Saigon and Asmara, Eritrea. A 
terminal was installed aboard UK' 
USNS Kingsport, Heginninjv with 
NASA's Gemini 8, this station has 
provided valuable service in relaying 
communications from ocean sites 
through Syncom to satellite ground 
terminals in the Pacific, and thence 
by conventional means to tho NASA 
Manned Space Flight dm Lor in 
Houston. Six-foot antenna terminals 
were installed aboard two of tho 
Navy's combatant ships. 

NASA, having completed its ex- 
perimental teats, has transferred 
operational responsibility of the Kyn- 
comti to the DOD. Conduct of opera- 
tional testing is continuing, with 
availability also for emergency opera- 
tional use in the Pacific and Jmlimi 
Ocean areas. 

The Defence Department, with tin? 
cooperation of the ComSat Corpora- 
tion, conducted teats over Marly Hircl 
and found that it provided reliable 
and high quality service, limited only 
by the effect which long tnmmmstmin 
times have on certain error detection 
and correction techniques, National 
policy, as expressed by the I'remdont 
in his annual report to Comn'esH 
Feb. 15, 1965, indicates the- "Gov- 
ernment will limit its DCSl> to 11 
capacity necessary to handle "uni<|m! 
and vital national security needs." 
DOD will use "commercial HtitiriliLtw 
and other common carrier communi- 
cations systems for the transmission 
oi ! the bulk of ite (DOD) truffle be- 
tween the United States and vuricnm 
overseas areas." Therefore, DOD is 
closely following ComSat platm. 

In July 1906, NASA requested the 
manager of the National Communica- 
tions System to determine IntlHnt' 
capability to provide communications 
in support of the Apollo mmme.l 
lights from certain land and ship 
locations. The Intelsat proposal for 
two satellites over the Pacific nml 
Atlantic Oceans has been tentatively 
accepted. NASA is now negotiating 
with the ComSat Corporation B 
manager for Intelsat, for provision of 
service in late 19(iO. 

Meanwhile, DOD is looking further 
into the future. Six contractors de- 
veloped conceptual studies on what 
should be the Defense Communica- 
tions Satellite System of the longer 
range future. These studies aru now 
being evaluated and shortly tho De- 
fense Communications Agency will , 
^.J^ommondationa to the Socro- 
mso on how to proceed to 
m the 1970's and later 



8 



May 1966 




Defense Procurement Circular No. 
40, March 21, 19(16. (1) Uniform 
Contract Line Item Numbering Sys- 
tem, (2) Effective Date of Labor 
Dept. Classification of Labor Surplus 
Areas. (3) Applicability of Service 
Contract Act of 1965. (4) Mandatory 
Use of Industrial Preference Ratings 
and Allotments. (5) Use of Excess 
Aluminum in National Stockpile. 



Each Defense Procurement Cir- 
cular is designed to place new or 
changed policy or procedures in 
effect prior to publication of an 
Armed Service Procurement Reg- 
ulation (ASPR) revision. ASPR 
subscribers will receive DPC's and 
ASPR revisions through the 
Superintendent of Documents, 
U.S. Government Printing Office, 
Washington, D.C. 20402. 



Antenna Study for Covert Appli- 
cations. Sylvania Electronic Defense 
Laboratories, Mountain View, Calif., 
tor the Army, Nov. 1965, 71 pp. 
Order No. AD-629 148. $3. 

Transverse Antenna Feed Study. 
faperry Gyroscope Co., for the Ail- 
Force, Jan. 1966, 112 pp. Order No. 
AD-C29 546. $4, 

Literature Survey Pertaining to 
Electrically Small Antennas, Propa- 
gation Through Vegetation and Re- 
lated Topics. Stanford Research In- 
stitute, for the Army, Jan. 1966, 300 
pp. Order No. AD-629 155. $6. 

Synthesis of Group IV Organo- 
metallic Polymers and Related Com- 
pounds. Institute for Organic Chem- 
istry, Utrecht, Netherlands, for the 
Air Force, Dec, 1965, 92 pp. Order 
No. AD-629 554. $3. 

Viscosity of Four Binary, Gaseous 
Mixtures at 20 and 30"C. University 
of Virginia, for the Navy, Jan. 1966, 
63 pp. Order No. AD-629 400. $3. 
. Chemistry o Rare Earth and Ac- 
timde Derivatives, Tctrapyrrol Pig- 
ment Derivatives of Rare Earth Ele- 
ments and Actinides. Library of Con- 
gress, for the Air Force, Jan. 1966, 
41 pp. Order No. AD-629 515. $2. 
Una of Models for the Investiga- 
tion of Fire Spread. Southwest Re- 
search Institute, Houston, Tex,, for 
the Defense Atomic Support Agency, 
Feb. 1966, 116 pp. Order No. AD~ 
628 783. $4. 

Helmet Design Criteria for Im- 
proved Crash Survival. Flight Safety 
Foundation, Phoenix, Ariz., for the 
Army, Jan, 1966, 121 pp. Order No. 
AD-628 678. $4. 

Project MAC Progress Report II ' 
July lffG4 to July 10(15. MIT for the 
Navy, 1965, 211 pp. Order No. AD- 
629 494. $6. 

Stability of Elastic Systems. Air 
Force Systems Command, Nov. 1965, 
1,046 pp. Order No. AD-628 608. 

$13.46. 

Screening of Chemical Toxicity to 
Marine BorersFinal Report. Naval 
Civil Engineering Lab, Port Hue- 
neme, Calif., Feb. 1966, 124 pp. 
Order No. AD-629 707. $4. 

A Study of Military Electronic 
and Electromechanical Specification 
Part Identification Requirements, 
North American Aviation, for the 
Air Force, Feb. 1966, 64 pp. Order 
No. AD-629 544. $3. 

rtJ B/*.'*. 4- -i ^ 2t Var actor-Tuned Filters at Micro- 

wectiomagnetw and Electrostatic wave Frequencies. Sylvania Elec- 

T)?v in? 1 ' Aer , 08 ace Technology tronic Defense Laboratories, Moun- 

^> Library of Congress for the tain View, Calif., for the Army, Dec. 

W^ i n^n >% 196 ' 6 ' 3S p P' Order 196B ' 46 PP- er No. AD-629 631. 
wo. AiJ-wi) 476. $2. $2. 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



Determination of Free Tungsten 
in Tungsten Silicide. AF Materials 
Lab, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 
Aug. 1965, 23 pp. Order No. AD- 
626 685. $1. 

Effects of Moisture on the Strength 
of Glass FibersA Literature Re- 
view. Whittaker's Narmco Research 
& Development Div., San Diego, for 
the Navy, June 19G5, 51 pp. Order 
No. AD-629 370. $3. 

Logistics Systems Capacity. Rand 
Corp., for the Air Force, Jan. 1966. 
48 pp. Order No. AD-629 131. $2. 

Systems Analysis Techniques for 
Planning - Programing - Budgeting, 
Rand Corp., for the Air Force, 
March I960, 32 pp. Order No. AD~ 
629 564. $ 2 . 

fundamental Research Activity in 
a Technology-Dependent Organiza- 
tion. Air Force Office of Scientific 
Research and Center for Technology 
and Administration, American Uni- 
versity, Nov. 1965, 110 pp. Order No. 
AD-628 747. $4. 

The ZA-3 Air Ciishion Vehicle 
lest Program Final Report. Republic 

^ 1 J atl n n Coi 'P-' for the Navy, Oct. 
1964, 212 pp, Order No, AD-607 
768. *g_ 

Deep-Water Metaloutting Torch, 
1 hose I Final Report. North Ameri- 
can Aviation, for the Navy, 196G, 37 
PP- Order No. AD-624 167. $2. 

A Study of Sleeve Bearings in 
Aircraft Support Structures. Bat- 
telle Memorial Institute, for the 

1 47 m - Order 



Investigation of High Power Gas- 
eous Electronics. Microwave Associ- 
ates, Burlington, Mass., for the 
Army, Nov. 1965, 62 pp. Order No. 
AD-629 537. $3. 

^Techniques for Microwave Compo- 
nents o/ Reduced Weight. Sylvania 
Electronic Defense Laboratories, 
Mountain View, Calif., for the Army, 
Nov. 1965, 42 pp. Order No. AD- 
629 930. $2. 
Van of MOfif Transistors in Solid- 
State Radiation Survey Meters. 
Army Electronics Command, Feb. 
I960, 13 pp. Order No. AD-629 709. 

$1. 

Physical Evaluaton of Thin Films 
of Solid State Materials. Air Force 
Cambridge Research Laboratory, 
Feb. 1966, 87 pp. Order No. AD-629 
061. $3. 

Ripple Tank Analogs of Electro- 
magnetic Scattering by Metallic and 
Dielectric Cylinders. Sylvania Elec- 
tronic Systems, for the Army, Oct. 
1965, 69 pp. Order No. AD-627 242. 

S3 

_ Social Motives and Decision-Mak- 
ing Behavior in Interpersonal Situa- 
tions. University of Illinois, for the 
Air Force, Sept. 1966, 145 pp. Order 
No. AD-626 487. $B. 

A Study of Visual Search Using 
Eye Movement Recordings. Honey- 
well Systems & Research Div., St. 
Paul, Minn., for the Navy, Feb. 1966, 
79 pp. Order No. AD-629 G24. $3. 
Effect of Format and Detail of Job 
Performance Aids in Performing 
Simulated Troubleshooting Tasks, 
Applied Science Associates, Valencia, 
Pa., for the Air Force, Nov. 1965, 
46 pp. Order No. AD-629 922. $3, 
Effect of Intensity Changes in 
Auxilliaw Stimuli on Auditory and 
Visual Signal Detection. Air Force 
Decision Sciences Laboratory, Dec. 
1965, 63 pp. Order No. AD-628 188. 

$3. 

IDEEA Network Implementation, 
Fiscal Year 3965, Frankford Arse- 
nal, Jan. 1966, 28 pp. Order No. AD- 
629 225. $2, 
^uminisence of Complex Molecules. 
Library of Congress, for the Air 
Force, Jan. 1966, 104 pp. Order No. 
AD-629 768. $4. 
Liquid State of Metals, Library of 
Congress, for the Air Force, Oct. 
1965, 44 pp. Order No. AD 626 598. 

$2. 

Development of an Improved Rinse 
Solution for Phosphate Coatings 
Through Addition of Organic Aeiaa, 
Rock Island Arsenal, Jan. 1966, 25 
pp. Order No. AD-628 072, $1. 

All Purpose Matrices for Corn- 
Continued on Paye 11) 



May 23-26: Annual Meeting and NCWH 
Conference of Aviation/Siwce Writ- 
ers Assn., New York Hilton, Now 
York City. 

May 23-27: Annual, Convention of 
Navy League, Mlrnmnr Hotel, Santa 
Monica, Calif. 

May 31-Juno 2; American Society 
for Quality Control Meeting. New 
York City. 

June 6-10: Society of Anlomollvt' 
Engineers Convention, Detroit 
Mich. 

June 6-10: Society of IMa.stic Indus- 
tries Convention, New York City. 

June 7-0: Anmed Forces Communica- 
tions & Electronics AHHII. Conven- 
tion, Sheraton-Park Hotel, Wash- 
ington, D.C. 

June 12-15: American Society for 

nWS'W Engineers Meeting, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

June 10-23: Aaau of InduHlrinl Ad- 
vertisers Meeting, New York City. 

June 19-24: Communication Worker* 
of America Meeting, St. Louis, Mo. 



June 2l)"2:t: American Nuclear So. 
ciely Meeliiif: Denver, Colo. 

June ai-21; Dnhi I'nici'Msiii); iMtui- 
aKcinerii AS.HII. Meclinj;, Chicni-u. 
III. 

June 2U-2-J: SHrid Aiiiunil IMeclhiK of 
it 1 hiMlilnle ol Navigation, Cedar 
*, Imvii. 



USAF Plans Electronics 
Briofing for Industry 



July fi-Hj American College Public 
KcltilioiiH AHHII, Meelinir, Hushm, 
Ma MM, 

July ll-lfi: Nnliomil Cniileri'iice <if 
Weinhln and Meiuum'M, Denver, 
Colo. 

July NT- 1!); National Andio-Vlsual 
AHHII. MiTtlng, WILH|I|HK|IHI, ]),('. 

July lit 2, 1 !: Nalloiml Tool, We mid 
1'reciHiou .Miirliiiiinj; AMJIII, .lleel- 
ing, Mot S|irini;.'t, VH, 

A 11 jr. 22-.Nt'|H. 11); Science ('ouHn-hM. 
lokyo, Ju|mn, 

Atiil 211 Sejil, 1: Ann-ridm l.ej;i'ii 
Nallonal Convenlimi, W 



IS 



Cenfer Serves Nuclear Research Field 



The Defense Atomic Support KOII- 
ey (DASA) data center at 81(1 Ktate 
btreet, Santa Barbara, Calif., re- 
equipped and relocated in modern 
quarters, has been renamed tho DASA 
5^?"" *nd Analysis Center 
(DASIAC). The center is now 
equipped to servo an extended com- 
munity of interest in tho nuclear re- 
search Held. 

DASA is the joint services organi- 
zation which plans and coordinated 
JJOD nuclear weapons programs. Tho 
agency's responsibilities include nu- 
clear weapons effects research and 
underground test programs, super- 
vision of tho nuclear stockpile, and 
contingency planning in other nuclear 
fields. DASA serves as tho primary 
technical and operational contact 
point between tho Military Services 
and agencies of tho Atomic Energy 
Commission. "* 

In addition to DASA and other DOD 





Tho center inmieii nnvtirn] \\nn\t\\ 
pult icatlonn. The /M.V/.-lC IHt.Ii,,,,.. 
r<WHt In 11 bi-monthly n.llrclloii of 

trcln of recent n.porhi U u<I ,|,,ia. 



,., ( 

technical journal for itrllrlua uet-n. 
"'g current NWKK nUulles and ,-- 
"nlwl ophia. Hpecial reporh, inelud.- 
ovaluatlmi of iironnunii, nlitlt* uf II,,. 
review, nf t . x . fl(| .i. 
,., !,,., , 
milnllon 



w ,' *n 

now include many other Government 
agencies. Data from nuclear an 
nuclear tests as well as research re- 
ports developed under theoretical 
laboratory and simulation p 
sponsored by DASA and other 

fi n7q a A W i reeHlarly rcceivcd - n< 
its DASA charter, the center continu- 

ously seeks data from agencies ot 
Erectly associated with DASA-funded 
research programs. Program areas 



Computer Program r,ilrary rv- 
, ra Kl''ly (inntmncitit in DAHtAC 
lcttttoiiH, Tiicludu fully docunu-nte'l 
uHo prognmiH for ,-,. w | lt ,,. ( , 
transrer to u.ilng u Kmw \ vn \, { , inil .ti nt i 
uthor prognuiiH, inonltoroil by tin* 
conter, nro extremely ] IUW , mtd rum- 
Plcx, or are UI1 under develoiun.'nt. 
> Bch cnmm, Inquiries are referred tn 
"to oiwuHxftUoiiH .o, ( pon (1 |bl l for ilu- 
dovolopmont of tho prognunH. 

V|itorH to tho center are i.rovl.led 
nivnto study , lm is and rm-IHUcH ft.r 

SL Xnm f "'I" " f vlrtun "y >'"l 
" n i f dn - Cl"i> through 
? J , wwnl'Mtor Hccurity 

auir for vI.ltH to or req 
from tho center 



, ',,i,, 

l>.vr ; ,MM. Atr C-.nv ;:\,|,, (l ./ (,'. 
nui'nl, 1, i,. lljnr.. -01,1 Fi,.], | M,,,.,. 
nil.) Ib- ViHi..,,,.) ;:, VH rl.v h^hiMrnll 
Afliit.elnll.ui, III Ht.Miill, JiUilt ;!(( ;i(|, 

, ' rilli '"i.-lini: i., I.-IMJ. h.,1,1 ,., i 
""'"""V. .'i'l...m,-,| ., t'ul ..... p | 1111;l 



llirlii,|.-,| I,, th.' Llt'-lllik- will I... ml 
\:ii'r,l nv'.t.-ni-'i |'i;mmnt; !' !ln" Mlrr 
ln.nl.- .'ivil.-ni', HIM-U,,,,, ., W( ,|| ,,, 



, , ..IU.-,, .,-.MnUnrv. 

\\ urn! I'iift. i !,,!! A i ii, n|,|,. 

. . |l ' 1 .""" J" ...... "'! HI iiM.-ii>lliir Hi.- 

M'l.-HiU! ''Imul.l iU,. f ., H,.. .V|,, lnllll | 
.'t-nuilv liulnttttiiil Ai>;i..i-iit(ion. |... 
piiiiitii-nj \, Muih- HUH. Kciii i,', ( )i Ml 



Testing Handbook 
Available to Industry 

'I'll" Mr;.l in u ,,,,,-j,.., ) [ lllt|i || ..... j.,, 
""mli-.'.tni.-liv.. |. .,H, (H t j,,v.-|,.[,n| |,v 
"I" 1 f .'v Aiiiiv Mul.-Hnl;. U.-r.-mvIt 



U(|i'.. ,,f 



Tin- lnu.H.,.k, filU-.l Kli-rhumiiK. 
i-Mihtj" HI ,V1,, i^.-viH.-,., irt-R. 

Hl'luilf.t !., MHriHfv ,, Ml | .vlli. 
li^tiniitr.- |,.-)>i,.i, m -| r'Mti'rl'ltt'>l 



-M (u,.| t.tli.-i- imiii-rttil tli 
i't^ in iiii'liils, 



ciitt 






. ,'!' n ;t!I Hm ''l 1 *' u -^ ti(vmtmnit 
n iliiiK nni,-.-, Wi.|ili.i,oi, I,r,, fur 
.*i>> H fM|)y, 

A ittrMiii) ImiullftKik hi the ti'rn.lc. 



i 

{II. filt), ha* |M-III ttpiirnvfil f.*r 
nn.1 will ^ nvnllnblr in 
ih m , morithti. 



May 



JUNE 

Panel Workshop on Basic Research 
in Malaria, June 15-17, at Walter 
Reed Army Institute of Research, 
Washington, B.C. Sponsor; Walter 
Reed Army Institute of Research. 
Contact: Dr. Elvio H. Sadiim, Dept. 
of Medical Zoology, Walter Reed 
, Army Institute of Research, Washing- 
s' ton, D.C. (Area Code 202) RA 8-1000. 
ext. 3308 

Eleventh Science Seminar, Juno 15- 
22, at Albuquerque, N.M. Sponsor: 
Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 
Office of Aerospace Research. Contact: 
David L. Arm, Director, Air Force 
Office of Scientific Research Science 
Seminar, Air Force Office of Scientific 
Research, Washington, D.C. 20333, 
(Area Code 202) 096-6127. 

Government Bids, Proposals and 
Contracts for Small Business Enter- 
prises Institute, June 17-18, at Pitts- 
burgh, Pa. Sponsor: Smaller Manufac- 
turers Council, an affiliate of the 
Chamber of Commerce of greater 
Pittsburgh, Pa. Contact: Earl W. 
Eriksson, Executive Director, Small 
Manufacturers Council, Chamber of 
Commerce Building, Pittsburgh, Pa. 
15219 (Area Code 412) 391-3400, ext. 
15. 

Seventh Informal Photochemistry 
Conference, June 20-22, at Ronsselacr 
Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y. Co- 
sponsors: Army Research Office- 
Durham and Rensselaer Polytechnic 
Institute. Contact; Dr. George Wy- 
man, Director, Chemistry Div., Army 
Research Office-Durham, Box CM, 
Duke Station, Durham, N.C. 2770G, 
(Area Code 919) 286-2285, ext. 33. 

International Conference on Crystal 
Growth, June 20-24, in Boston, Mass. 
Sponsor: Air Force Cambridge Re- 
search Laboratories. Contact: Charles 
S. Sahagian (CRWPC), Air Force 
Cambridge Research Laboratories, 
L. G. Hanscom Field, Bedford, Mass. 
01731, (Area Code 617) CR 4-6100, 
ext. 3298. 

Gordon Research Conference on 
Interaction and Transport in Physical, 
Chemical and Biological Systems, 
June 20-24, at Proctor Academy, Anti- 
over, N.H. Sponsor: Office of Naval 
Research. Contact: Mrs. P H. Ten- 
niswood, Code 444, Office of Naval 
Research Washington D.C. 20360 
, (Area Code 202) OXford 6-1538. 

JULY 

1966 Annual Conference on Nuclear 
and Space Radiation Effects, July 18- 
22, at Stanford University, Palo 
Alto, Calif. Sponsors: Army Research 
Office, Institute of Electrical and Elec- 
tronics Engineers, National Aeronau- 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



tics and Space Administration, Office 
of Naval Research and the Air Force. 
Contact: Lt. Col. J. E. Houseworth, 
Physical Sciences Div., Army Re- 
search Office, Washington, D.C. (Area 
Code 202) OXford 4-3446. 

AUGUST 

1966 Linguistic Institute Conference 
on Linguistic Method, Aug. 1-3, at the 
University of California at Los An- 
geles. Sponsor: Air Force Office of 
Scientific Research, Contact: R. W. 
Swanaou (SRT), Air Force Office of 
Scientific Research, Washington, D.C. 
20333, (Area Code 202) OXford 6- 
5374. 

Eleventh International Symposium 
on Combustion, Aug. 14-20, at the 
University of California, Berkeley, 
Calif. Co-sponsors: Ballistic Research 
Laboratory and the Combustion In- 
stitute of Pittsburgh, Pa. Contact Dr. 
It. J. Heaston, Physical Sciences Div. 
Army Research Office, 3045 Columbia 
Pike, Arlington, Va., (Area Code 202) 
OXford 4-3465. 

Second Computer & Information 
Sciences Symposium on Learning, 
Adaptation and Control in Informa- 
tion Systems, Aug. 22-24, at Colum- 
bus, Ohio. Sponsors: Office of Naval 
Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, 
Ohio State University. Contact: Julius 
T. Toil, COINS Co-Chairman, Di- 
rector, Communications Science Re- 
search Center, Battelle Memorial 
Institute, Columbus, Ohio, 43201. 

Application of Generalised Func- 
tions to System Theory Conference, 
Aug. 25-26, at the State University 
of New York, Stony Brook, N.Y, 
Co-sponsors : Air Force Office of 
Scientific Research and Society for 
Industrial and Applied Mathematics. 
Contact: Capt. John Jones, Jr. 
(SRMA), Air Force Office of Scien- 
tific Research. Washington, D.C. 
20333, (Area Code 202) OXford 6- 
1302. 

Uiiffuidcd Rocket Ballistics, Aug. 
30-Sopt. 1, at Texas Western Col- 
lege, El Paso, Tex. Sponsor: Army 
Electronics Research & Development 
Agency. Contact; V. C. Cochran, 
Army Electronics Research & Devel- 
opment Agency, White Sands Missile 
Range, N.M. 88002. 

Logic, Computability and Auto- 
mata, date and place undetermined. 

Co-sponsors; Hughes Aircraft Co. 
and the Rome Air Development 
Center, Contact: C. A. Constantino 
(EMID), Rome Air Development 
Center, Griffiss AFB, N.Y., 13440. 

Ocean Electronics Symposium, 
Aug. 29-81, at Honolulu, Hawaii. 
Sponsor: Hawaii Section, Institute of 



Electrical and Electronics Engineers 
(IEEE). Contact: Robert R. Hill 
Chairman, IEEE Ocean Electronics 
Symposium Headquarters, 1441 Kapi- 
olmii Blvd., Suite 1320, Honolulu, 
Hawaii, 96814. 

SEPTEMBER 

U.S. National Committee for Pure 
and Applied Biophysics in connection 
with Second International Biophysics 
Congress, Sept. 5-9, in Vienna, Aus- 
tria. Sponsor: Office of Naval Re- 
search. Contact: Mrs. P.' H. Tennis- 
wood, Code 444, Office of Naval Re- 
search, Washington, D.G. 20360, 
(Area Code 202) OXford 6-1688. 

Sixth Symposium on Naval Hydro- 
dynamics, Maneuverability, Waves 
and Physics of Fluids, Sept 29-30., 
Oct 3-4, at Washington, D.C. Spon- 
sor: Office of Naval Research. Con- 
tact: Mrs. S. W. Doroff, Office of 
Naval Research, Code 438, Washing- 
ton D.C. 20360, (Area Code 202) 
OXford 6-1433. 



Bibliography 

(Continued from Page 9) 

pressed Food Bars. Pillsbury Co., for 
the Army, Jan. 1966, 149 pp. Order 
No. AD-628 377. $4. 

Design Guide for Pofyurethane 
Foam Isolation Systems, Naval Air 
Development Center, Johnsville, Pa., 
Dec. 1965, 124 pp. Order No. AD- 
626 816. $L 

An Evaluation of the Ultrasonic 
Machining Process, Rock Island Ar- 
senal, Feb. 1966, 18 pp. Order No. 
AD-629 073. $1. 

Interfacial Interaction in Compos- 
ite Structures, Alpha Research & De- 
velopment, Blue Island, 111., for the 
Navy, Feb. 1966, 54 pp, Order No. 
AD-629 899. $8. 

Thermal Conductivity of Pyrex 
Glass; Selected Values, Army Natick 
Laboratories, March 1966. 16 pp. 
Order No. AD-630 186. $1. 



Government research and devel- 
opment reports are available to 
science and industry at price indi- 
cated from: 
Clearinghouse for Federal and 

Scientific Information 
Department of Commerce 
Springfteld, Va. 22161 

Authorized D D contractors 
and grantees may obtain these 
documents without charge from: 
Defense Documentation Center 
Cameron Station 
Alexandria, Va. 22314 



11 



Youth Opportunity Campaign 

(Continued from Page 1) 
I have directed a re-allocation of 
Economic Opportunity Act funds to 
permit an extention of the Neighbor- 
hood Youth Corps prog-ram to an ad- 
ditional 26,000 boys and girls. 

I ask again that the Governor of 
each of the GO states, and the Mayor 
of each city with, a population of 
over 10,000, consider whether a 
trainee employment program like the 
one we arc working out for the Fed- 
eral Government will be possible anil 
practicable. One percent of the num- 
ber of their employees would he 
30,000. 
Tnslt Force Appointment, 

I am asking: the Vice President as 
Chairman of the Youth Opportunity 
Task Force to appoint an advisory 
committee to implement and work 
out the details of the program. Thin 
advisory committee will include repre- 
sentatives of the U.S. Department of 
Commerce, the U.S. Department of 
Labor, the Small Business Adminis- 
tration, state and local (governments, 
aad business and labor organizations. 
It must be clear that this program 
will be worthwhile only if it means 
extra work-training opportunities 
over and above those which would 
normally be offered. It would be 
worthless or worse if this program 
only replaced regular employment 
opportunities. 

It must also be clear that we can- 
not and do not assure all hoytt and 
gma work this summer. We all will 
do the host we can. 

A boy or girl who wants a chance 
to work and who is denied that 
chance costs this country more than 
it can afford. This is a special prob- 
lem demanding special attention 



Nuclocir Superiority 

(Coiil-hutcil /nnii 



.{) 



DISC Establishes 
Codification Division 



. ? r 

Prove the center's service toNATO 

' 



' . , 

em 



12 



efforts to determine llm differenn' In 1 
twoen earlh motions) nnmcd by nuclear 
explosion!! and eai'lh(|imkt','i. 

Some extremely mKnillniiil i-nnlri- 
hutioiiH lo l.he lent ban (renty ;mfr 
guards have conm from new Itvli 
i) it | u on In the sitmilalimi nf rnn-limi 1 
effects. Many of UICHO te<-hnii|H<>:i 
were developed by Mx .Special Wrnji 
ons Onler and Urn Air Korrc Wciip 
ons Laboratory, alito localed nl. Kirl 
land AFH and a purl, of Ny.'il.'mn 
Command's Research utiil 'IVchno|ni:y 
Division. 

KU'eeln simulation wnrlt hi'jrnn ni 
Kirtland durliuf the HUiH imtt ni..in 
torlum on nuclear It'ul.lnt:. (Tin 1 
Soviets hrolte the moratorium in Iptil 
hy conducting a mirles of almn:i|ih<<rlr 
tests,) 

Important advances in Ibc iilmnhi 
Won state of the art have talcm |>lm<<> 
Hinee then. They have rival ly in 
ereased our t'onlldeiicn In that, 'nuim- 
data proihu-ml by non-tMir]i>ar Irrb 
H is reliable anil can Im mnv- 
with the ell'eets uf (Mhi ublalni'd 
from nuiilear ex)ihmlonn, 

Present Kpuclnl \Vi*aiHniit (','ntni- 



of nuclear slmi-k and eln-lroi. 
radiation. One form of nho.-ls 

tion i carried out In imHun.li- 
raoillty h, whleh huw aynlm,in ro,n 
lionentu and iinhsyMteiiiti nin bi> (fttt-.l 
Another form of nlmrh ulnuiliillnii |- ( 
nclilovod with a new tt'i'lml.,,,,, | llV n|v 
J"lf MKh oxjtloslves ilpv(-li|n.,l by U,,, 
Weapons LalmnUory. 



nidijiliim , ,,), ' 



,. u-llily |,y |.| |y 
' 



wl,, ( -l, I,,,:. I,,-,, Ir ,,|,lnl | t> - 1 1,,, W,, t m 



-"'.'.MM.y I-, n nijl jur ,,,,, f lirwm , (| 



I"! MH- :.IMIlllllll..|| nltttc nf tb(. iu-1. 



)lililil " i i" Hu- ....... ulluti i.f inirlfiir i-f 



'"">">' '""I i.-.-l,nl ( , 



r,| KII ,( rh.vltullt. 



.'HIM tui.'tticr lnt|K'iiiuif r,.nt,.|- ,-iin, 



n i,, M,,, i,..,i In,,, h.-i.iy (m iV- 




TliM SjM.iMl \V,( ( i| t ,., n (Vnh.i-'rt ruin 

111 HlllllltllllliMK '.III' IIMfi..!!!!) iltlf.'. 

irmn.h tin,),,,- flu* (,.-,( 1, 1I . 



tl.. pulne MJmnlulinn IN 
mrrled out with 10.nillHnn.vnli mid 
H'O.OOO-volt IraiiH.ri, miry, *,,,. 

l, 11((1 ' ,. 



mid 



, (KII ,. ( . 
l'lHO created hy mic , uflr J s| 



C'I. H't Itnw MM.M'itt|Mtif4 (if nurli'it 
'IKV t^pt.-ir.l. ititi l'i-rni-,1 will hi' 
HHt KVvit liKin: hlllt-fui' 



DEFENSE PRIME CONTRACT AWARDS 
TO SMALL BUSINESS 



(Amount* in T 



Procurement from All 




Wi I-Vli i;r: .fill IH t-Vh 



H.IH 
2 



77 



May 1966 



Briefed below are some events 
and projects within the Depart- 
ment of Defense which may be of 
interest to writers and editors. If 
further information oil any of 
these topics is desired, please 
write to Chief, Magazine and 
Book Branch, Office of Assistant 
Secretary of Defense (Public Af- 
fairs), Washington, D.C. 20301 



ARMY TESTS NEW LIGHT- 
WEIGHT AIR CONDITIONERS 

Two newly designed air condi- 
tioners built to protect electronics 
gear from damage caused by high 
temperatures and humidity are being 
tested by the U.S. Army. 

The units are of lighter weight 
than air conditioners of similar ca- 
pacities weighing 390 and 520 pounds 
compared with the 4(50 pounds and 
1,200 pounds of units now used. 
Wrapper-type frame construction, 
plate fin compact heat exchangers 
and lightweight materials account 
for the weight reduction, 

Production units will be used for 
cooling and dehumidifying missile 
nre control vans, communications 
shelters and housings for electronic 
systems. 

NEW FOOD PRESERVATION 

PROCESS MAY INCREASE 

VARIETY IN O.I. DIET 

Pilots forced to bail out over re- 
mote areas may find tasty dinners in 
their survival kits as a result of 
Army research on irradiated foods, a 
new technique hailed by scientists as 
the first really revolutionary preser- 
vation process since the discovery of 
thermal canning more than 150 years 
ago. 

The new method could result in 
reduced refrigeration needs, lower 
food losses through spoilage, better 
control of food-borne diseases and 
wider availability of fresh meats and 
vegetables to field units in combat, 
.the process could also furnish a 
greater variety of foods to combat 
personnel operating anywhere and 
under any conditions. 

In the radiation process, the foods 
are packed and then receive a very 
small dose of gamma rays from a 
cobalt-60 source. No radiation re- 
mains in the treated food which is 
as healthful as any heat-processed 
food. 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



NEW ARMY COMBAT 

UNIFORM WILL GIVE 

GREATER PROTECTION 

TO TROOPS 

The U.S. Army is developing a 
new all-climate combat uniform de- 
signed to give troops a higher degree 
o protection against such hazards as 
chemical, biological and radiological 
agents, thermal radiation and frag- 
ments from high-velocity missiles. 

The uniform is a multifunctional 
protective system equipped with a 
heat regulation device for maintain- 
ing thermal balance regardless of 
weather conditions or activity. Heat 
regulation is achieved by circulating 
air within the clothing system. Main 
components of the total system con- 
sist of an integrated headgear assem- 
bly, a body ensemble including hand- 
wear and footwear and the integrated 
heat regulation unit. The prototype 
weighs 37 pounds. 



SURFACE COATING OF 

SATELLITES STUDIED 

BY AIR FORCE 

A satellite covered with four typca 
of thermal-control coating is orbiting 1 
the earth as part of an Air Force 
experiment to find bettor .surface 
coatings for present and future 
spacecraft and satellites. 

Tho four types include: aolur re- 
flective surfaces, solar absorbers, 
infra-red emitters and thin-film 
multi-layered coatings. AH wore sub- 
jected to vacuum, heat and ultra- 
violet radiation testa boforo lining 
launched into space from Vandimhorg 
AFB, Calif., March 30. 

If the more promising ones fulfill 
expectations, their improved charac- 
teristics will enablo future spacecraft 
and satellites to operate effectively 
for longer periods. Tho satellite; will 
remain in orbit for a year with simi- 
lar experiments planned for the fu- 
ture. 




HARDIMAN 

A set of mechanical muscles which will enable a man to lift i Knn i 
while exerting only 40 pounds of force is being developed Jotallv hv ?! P I Unds 
and Navy The unique apparatus, nicknamed Hardimii, will be fntliSl^V 
an operator's feet, forearms and waist enabling him to norfnvm ilSJ cd * to 
beyond his normal strength. The Navy hopes to put Hardimnn t\vn,t n ? k * ,, fnr 
bomb* on aircraft as well as handling heavy cargo 11 coi flnorl , , loa<Hl1 * 
helping out with underwater salvage jobs comincd spaces mid 



13 




Gen. R. R Marlin, USA 
Dir. of Plans and Programs 
Office, Chief of Research and Development 
Department of the Army 



It can he said that the ultimate goal 
of any research and development ef- 
fort is to build a better product than 
one's competitor. In the Defense R&D 
business the mission is to insure that 
wu develop weapons, equipment and 
techniques qualitatively superior to 
those of any potential enemy, in any 
geographical environment, and under 
all conditions of war. 

Similarly, any successful research 
and development effort whether it be 
private industry or Defense has to 
have a number of common compon- 
ents: an objective, qualified people 
in a workable organizational pattern 
and, of course, the sine qua non- 
money. For the benefit of those who 
are not familiar with Army R&D 
I will summarize the principal fea- 
tures of how the Army plans and 
determines its objectives, how it is 
organized for R&D, and how it allo- 
cates its R&D money and manages its 
programs. 

In the area of planning I shall 
focus upon the organizations and pro- 
cedures through which the Army 
evolves its broad materiel needs. 

Guided by this planning, the next 
step in the Army process is the defi- 
nition of systems needs and their 
justification to the satisfaction of the 
Army, the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense, the President, and ultimately 
to the Congress. At this point, 
these needs are requirements in that 
they represent a careful selection of 
potential advances eliminating the 
mce-to-have and reflecting real strides 
forward in combat capability. In this 
aelection they have been subjected to 
a wide concensus in the Army, where- 
in the users' views of usefulness and 
battlefield compatibility have been 
paramount, 

. Th j e third Potion of the article is 
aimed at the nature of the program, 
its conduct, and a brief coverage of 
some of the management techniques 
employed, 

As background for my further re- 
marks with regard to these areas- 
there are three important influences 
much I must mention, 



14 



The first of these is the organiza- 
tion of the Army. In mid-1902 two 
new major Army commands were es- 
tablished. At that time the Army 
Materiel Command was created and 
given responsibility for the majority 
of the hardware development, pro- 
curement, and supply and distribution 
missions of the Army. This action 
gave central direction and control of 
these efforts. At the same time the 
Combat Development Command took 
over responsibility under one com- 
manderthe previously scattered doc- 
trinal, organizational and material 
requirements functions for the Army 
in the field. 

The second influence is the neces- 
sary continual interplay between re- 
quirements definition and fulfillment, 
and the essential scientific and tech- 
nological base. The Combat Develop- 
ments Command (CDC) and the 
Army Materiel Command (AMC) 
work closely together so that real ad- 
vances will result from this cross- 
feeding of information. 

The third influence is the inherent 
complexity of the Army's problem in 
defining requirements based on its 



broad and varied mission. Whiles co 
corned with all elements of the spi; 
truni and conflict, the Army's itmji 
role in providing- yen oral purpi): 
forces poses an infinite variety ( 
potential requirements. This ck i mim< 
that planning, definition and fulfil 
ment be selective, rcprusiant a hu 
anced use of resources, and be pr< 
ductive within a reasonable lime. 

At this point, let me cover brief I 
the organization structure -for Arm 
R&D (Chart 1). At tho top of th 
pyramid is the Secretary of the Armj 
He is responsible for all of the at: 
tivities of the Department, to int'liid 
those of research and development. 

Plis principal assistant in UKW 
matters is the Assistant Secretary o 
the Army (Research mid Develop 
ment), who maintains policy sniper 
vision over the K&D program, Ih 
has a very small .stall' and relies upon 
the staff of the Chief of He-search jiml 
Development (CRD) as may bo re- 
quired in the execution of his re- 
sponsibilities. 

Also involved, but to a lesser de- 
gree, is tho Assistant Kccrutury of the 
Army (Installations & Lotties). II 
is primarily concerned with prujiru- 
duction engineering- and allied iidiv- 
itics which provide tho inUvfiice be- 
tween R&D imd the procurement of 
materiel item for Service use, an wull 
as maintaining cognisance ovur alt 
procurement policies, including tlioflw 
for R&D. 

R&D budget requests and progr-nm- 
mlng actions are reviewed and iicluil 
upon by the Office of the AsaisUnL 




May 1966 



Secretary of the Army ( Financial 
Management). All of these above- 
mentioned officials are civilians, ap- 
pointed by the President. 

The Chief of Research and Develop- 
ment is a three-star general and a 
member of the General Staff, He is 
responsible to the Chief of Staff of 
the Army for planning, programming 
and supervising all Army R&D, while 
the Deputy Chief of Staff for Person- 
nel is interested in special R&D re- 
garding personnel selection and clas- 
sification research, and in the impact 
of materiel developments on the 
strength and skill levels of the Army. 
Also on the General Staff is the As- 
sistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence 
(ACSI). He is responsible for tech- 
nical intelligence activities, the coordi- 
nation of surveillance and reconnais- 
sance measures, and for monitoring 
projects of intelligence and reconnais- 
sance appearing in the R&D program. 
The monitoring of logistical research 
and the supervision of production 
activities for items engineered for 
Service use is a responsibility of the 
Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, 
while the Assistant Chief of Staff for 
Force Development is responsible for 
supervision and coordination of com- 
bat developments and related policy 
in conjunction with the research and 
development function assigned to the 
Chief of Research and Development. 
I will mention more on the execution 
of these General Staff responsibilities 
later. 

As I noted earlier, the Commanding 
General of the Combat Developments 



Command is responsible for the doc- 
trinal, organizational and materiel 
requirements function associated with 
combat developments or, simply put, 
determining how the Army of the 
future should be organized, how it 
should be equipped, and how it should 
fight. As an important part of this 
responsibility, CDC represents the 
Service users of materiel developed 
primarily for the Army in the field. 
The principal relationship of the Con- 
tinental Army Command with Army 
R&D is in connection with training 
aids and devices for both individual 
and unit training. 

The Army Materiel Command is 
the principal Army developing agency, 
with about 90 percent of the Army 
R&D budget expended by that com- 
mand. Other major Army developing 
agencies include Office of the Chief of 
Engineers, Office of the Surgeon Gen- 
eral and the U.S. Army Security 
Agency. 

A principal criteria for Army R&D 
effort and the planning leading to- 
ward such effort is that it be require- 
ments oriented. This orientation to- 
wards requirements stated by the 
potential user is conducted in an at- 
mosphere which recognizes the so- 
called "push of technology." Strategy 
and doctrine, to include outline or- 
ganization, is a prime motivator in 
the planning of Army R&D. The 
objective here is to insure that sys- 
tems requirements are not originated 
in isolation, but are responsive to 
well conceived and integrated concepts 
of deployment and use. At the same 




Chart 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



time it is recognized that innovation 
may present a systems capability 
which may lead to new strategy and 
doctrine. Another important ingredi- 
ent is provided by the somewhat 
longer range possibilities of science 
and technology the future potentials 
stemming from a properly supported 
technological base. 

The R&D planning concept, then, is 
based on the inter-action of the fol- 
lowing factors: first, the Combat 
Developments system, which embraces 
the formulation of new doctrine, or- 
ganization and materiel objectives and 
requirements and the early integra- 
tion of these products into the Army, 
the means by which systems require- 
ments are evolved; second, the Army 
Research Plan, which guides research 
and exploratory development, the ve- 
hicle for planning courses of action 
leading to advances in the technolog- 
ical base; third, the influence reflected 
in the Army family of plans, research 
and development plans, and certain 
Department of Defense planning docu- 
ments. 

Each plan in the Army family of 
plans is projected 20 years into the 
future. The keystone plan is the Basic 
Army Strategic Estimate (BASE), 
essentially a long range estimate of 
the situation which culminates in the 
statement of a broad strategic con- 
cept as it affects the land battle. Tho 
R&D input into this plan is the 
technological forecast portraying sci- 
entific and technical advances con- 
sidered feasible within the time frame 
concerned. This forecast assumes full 
exploitation of these capabilities with- 
out regard to resource restraints and 
covers both anticipated U.S. capabili- 
ties and significant foreign capabili- 
ties. 

The second important member of 
the family of plans is the Army 
Strategic Plan. This document re- 
flects the strategic concepts contained 
in the BASE. As part of its coverage, 
the plan specifies a number of Prior- 
ity Operational Requirements tor 
materiel development. These require- 
ments are purposely broad in nature 
to provide maximum flexibility in the 
means by which they may be met. For 
example, Q current Priority Opera- 
tional Requirement states the need to 
develop a capability to conduct opera- 
tions at night under conditions of poor 
visibility but with near daylight effi- 
ciency, In aggregate, these Priority 
Operational Requirements describe 
important goals whose attainment 



15 



would significantly improve opera- 
tional capabilities. These goals guide 
both Combat Developments Plans and 
the Army Research Plan. The Army 
Force Development Plan insures that 
materiel which results from the R&D 
program is integrated into existing 
forces in a manner to best utilize 
available and on-coming resources. 
During- the development of the plan, 
R&D personnel provide up-to-date in- 
formation on the availability of sys- 
tems under development and temper 
development progress in accordance 
with the schedules for the fielding of 
such systems. 

I have already covered the concept 
of the Army Research Plan. It should 
be noted that its purpose is to provide 
a base for future systems and that it 
covers the research and exploratory 
development categories. Combat De- 
velopments Plans are a product of the 
CDC and, as approved by the Depart- 
ment of the Army, provide definitive 
materiel requirements for R&D effort 
in the advanced, engineering and op- 
erational systems development cate- 
gories. Each developing agency also 
conducts both long-range and short- 
range planning for R&D. Long-range 
planning is aimed at the areas ad- 
dressed in the technological forecast, 
while short-range planning covers 
the period of the Five Year Force 
Structure and Financial Program. 

Another vitally important guidance 
document is the Army Five Year 
Force Structure and Financial Pro- 
gram. This is a planning document 
required by the Department of De- 
fense for all Services, and it contains 
financial guidance over the immediate 
five-year period. 

Having covered briefly the func- 
tion of the Combat Developments 
system, let me elaborate on it a bit. 
The operation of the Combat Develop- 
ments system is centered in the Com- 
bat Developments Command (Chart 
2.) 

The Institute of Advanced Studies 
prepares the long-range, broad- outline, 
concept studies which set forth what 
the Army should be like in the future. 
The Combined Arms Group develops 
the doctrine studies employing the 
types of division, corps and field 
armies associated with each particu- 
lar time period. Derivative studies 
for each of the Combat Arms are 
developed by the subordinate agencies 
shown, as are initial materiel require- 
ments stemming from such studies. 
Each of these agencies is collocated 



16 



where possible with the Army service 
school and test and evaluation ele- 
ment with which it is associated. For 
example, the Armor Agency is located 
at Fort Knox, Ky., with the U.S. 
Army Armor School and the Armor 
Board. Thus, the formulation of 
doctrine and materiel requirements, 
the service tests of items of hardware, 
and school training are all conducted 
at armor installations and activities. 
The Combat Service Support 
Group develops logistics doctrine and 
organizational concepts to support the 
combat elements in accordance with 
the overall conceptual study blueprint. 
The nine subordinate agencies of the 
Combat Service Support Group pro- 
duce derivative studies and materiel 
requirements in the service support 
area similar to those produced by the 
subordinate agencies of the Combined 
Arms Group. 

The Experimentation Command is 
the field laboratory for evaluating 
tactical and organizational concepts 
through battalion level. 

The Special Warfare and Civil 
Affairs Group is responsible for sta- 
bility operations, unconventional war- 
fare, psychological operations and 
warfare, psychological operations and 
civil affairs. It also maintains close 
liaison with the Army Concept Team 
in Vietnam. 

A key to success in the system is 
continuous liaison between the ele- 
ments of CDC and the laboratories, 
arsenals and test facilities of the 
Army's developing agencies. The labo- 
ratory elements concerned accomplish 
their functions through both in-house 



and out-of-houso work. About 70 pe: 
cent of the total effort is accomplish* 
out-of-house. 

To describe this organization i 
general terms (Chart 3), the Chiefs < 
Research and Development direcl 
and supervises the Army's Limite 
War Laboratory a quick rcnctio 
capability and, through the Directo 
of Army Research, the research an 
exploratory development effort o 
seven research activities of a pr< 
gram-wide nature. The Surged 
General and the Chief of Engineer 
each direct the laboratory activitio 
peculiar to their functions, while th 
Army Security Agency fulfills it 
laboratory requirements through con 
tracts and through the In bo rater; 
facilities of the AMC Electronics Com 
mand. 

Because of the wide scope of activi 
ties assigned, AMC maintains eijjh 
laboratories of command-wide inter 
est, such as the Ballistics Rcnoarcl 
Laboratory, the Materials Reseiircl 
Agency and the Human Engineering 
Laboratory. In addition, the five Coin 
modity Commands Missile, Muni 
tions, Weapons, Electronics and Mo 
bility each maintain a laboratorj 
capability responsible to its jmrtlcuhii 
commodity area, The Test & Evalua- 
tion Command controls the test boards 
proving ground and tost centers as- 
signed to AMC. 

Turning now to requirements clcfi. 
nition, the materiel requirements ol 
the Army are stated in four docu- 
ments. First is the Qualitative Mute- 
riel Development Objective (QMDO), 
(Continued on Page 22) 




Chart 3, 



May 1966 



T W T F S 



2345678 

9 ao ii ia 13 11 is 

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 
23 24 25 26 27 28 20 

30 31 



imm. 



7 1 

1231 

5 6 7 a 9 10 n 

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 
26 27 28 29 30 



S M T W T F S 

1 2 

3456789 
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 S3 
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 



SPEAKERS CALENDAR 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Lt Gen. II. C. Donnelly, USAP, 
Dir., Defense Atomic Support Agency, 
at Memorial Day Observance. Santa 
Fe, N. M., May 30. 

Brig. Gen. J, II. Wcincr, USAF 
Chief of Staff, Defense Communca- 
tions Agency, at Institute of Elec- 
trical and Electronics Engineers, Phil- 
adelphia, Pa., June 15-16. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Gen, Frank S. Bcsson, Jr., Com- 
manding General, Army Materiel 
Command, at 160th anniversary of 
Rein ington Arms Co., Ilion, N.Y., 
June 16. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

Hoar Aclm. Edward J. Faliy, Chief, 
Ships Systems Command (new title 
for Bureau of Ships), at ROTO corn- 



Varying requirements levied on the 
Defense Department for reporting to 
different organizations under differ- 
ent codes for geographic entities, for- 
eign countries and the United States 
contributed largely to the establish- 
ment of the data standardization pro- 
gram reported in the Bulletin in 
February 1065. 

Compound confusion and inability 
to provide proper and timely data 
resulted from the varying codes. A 
few among the differing require- 
ments were personnel reports using 
a code from a civilian agency, a com- 
mand and control system using a 
code based on spelling of the name, 
a different code for civil defense re- 
ports and another code entirely for 
use in financial records and reports. 
The codes ranged from two to four 
digits. More important, the definition 
and delimitation of terms differed 
since the geographic entities identi- 
fied in any two of the codes differed. 

Much analytic effort was required 
before any data interchange or sys- 
tem integration could be effected and, 
in some cases, reconciliation was im- 
possible, The first data elements to 
be standardized under the program 
have been states of the United 
States, countries, continents and 
water areas, These standard data 
elements have been implemented in 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



missioning, Massachusetts Institute of 
Technology, Cambridge, Mass., June 
9. 

Hear Adm. Robert H. Speck, Com- 
mandant, Fourth Naval District, at 
Flag Day Luncheon, Philadelphia, 
June 13. 

Hon. Robert H. B. Baldwin, Under 
Secretary of the Navy, at California 
Group of Investment Bankers Assn. 
Meeting, Long Beach, Calif., June 27. 

Adm. Alfred G. Ward, U.S. Repre- 
sentative to NATO Standing Group 
and Military Committee, at Inde- 
pendence Day Celebration, Birming- 
ham, Ala., July 4. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Hon. Harold Brown, Secretary of 
Air Force, at Council on Foreign Re- 
lations, New York City, June 6. 

Dr. R. G. Loewy, Chief Scientist of 
the Air Force, at American Institute 
of Aeronautics and Astronautics Meet- 
ing, Columbus, Ohio, June 14-16. 



about 1,000 DOD data systems, al- 
lowing integration and interface be- 
tween such systems as procurement, 
supply, and command and control. 
They provide for multi-functional ap- 
plication and the highest level of sys- 
tems integration obtainable. 

The data standardization program 
was initiated to assure the develop- 
ment and implementation of standard 
data elements and related codes, i.e., 
the words and terms used to commu- 
nicate data and the codes used to 
represent them. The responsibility 
for the program was assigned to the 
Assistant Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller). 

The uncontrolled evolution of dif- 
ferent English terms to identify the 
same piece of data, such as "Weap- 
ons System Designator" and "Ac- 
count or Weapon System Code" to 
represent "Ownership Account," led 
to problems in the DOD data sys- 
tems. If two systems need to inter- 
face and each produces data about a 
common piece of data identifying a 
common characteristic, unless the 
systems internally identify the com- 
mon characteristic in precisely the 
same words, meaning precisely the 
same thing and coded precisely the 
same way, a varying degree of con- 
version and interpretation is re- 
quired. Any conclusions and decisions 



Gen. B, A. Schriever, Commander, 
Air Force Systems Command, at 
American Institute of Aeronautics and 
Astronautics Meeting, Air Force Acad- 
emy, Colo. ; June 15; at Tennessee 
Space Institute, Arnold AF Station, 
Tenn., July 11. 

Brig. Gen. L. F. Tnnberg, Dep. 
Chief of Staff for Materiel, Tactical 
Air Command, at Institute of Naviga- 
tion, Meeting, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 
June 23. 

Maj. Gen. B. I. Funk, Commander, 
Space Systems Div., Air Force Sys- 
tems Command, at American Society 
for Quality Control Meeting, Los An- 
geles, June 28 ; at British United 
Services, Los Angeles, July 16. 

Maj. Gen. M. C. Dernier, Com- 
mander, Research & Technology Div., 
Air Force Systems Command, at 
Space & Ballistic Missile Technical 
Symposium, Air Force Academy, 
Colo., July 6-S. 

Lt. Gen. W. A. Davis, Vice Com- 
mander, Air Force Systems Command, 
at Atlantic Research Conference, 
Costa Mesa, Calif., July 29. 



resulting from analysis of the com- 
bined data may easily be erroneous. 

Under the program, initiated in 
September 1964, 12 projects for data 
standardization have been under- 
taken within DOD. These projects 
have been assigned to the vari- 
ous DOD components for development 
of standard data elements and re- 
lated codes. Some of the projects for 
standardization of the data elements 
and codes are: 

The Military Standard Contract 
Administration Procedures (MIL- 
SCAP) by the Defense Supply 
Agency. 

The Joint Uniform Military Pny 
System (JUMPS) by the Air Force. 

The National Military Command 
System by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

Hundreds of data elements will be 
studied in these projects. It is antici- 
pated that many existing codes and 
data expressions will be eliminated 
through the refining process of sub- 
jecting them to the disciplines of 
data standardization and developing 
standard data elements for use in all 
systems by all DOD organizations. 

The impact of the standardization 
projects varies from such data ele- 
ments as "Personnel Name," which is 
mainly used in the many personnel 
data systems, to such as the "Defense 
(Continued on Page %1 ) 



17 




TIII" fnr'Ai/r'r^p 

I Hr SPrAKrkrS 
MEL JiS-.r%l\L-i\J 



_>ts from addrt'iitt h}/ Mr. 
John M. Malhy, l),,p. Aunt. ,S'mv.. 
tnry of Defttnan (Pror-nrmvHt), nl 
thu DO!) Advanct'i! I'lamtiiin Jlrit'f- 
inffH for Jndmlry, Huston, HJ,init. t 
March II, .1911(1. 




tollll Illlllllll'HH WJMl \1t\H l-l H-i >| ,-, , .;.,,.,,{,, ,) ,, ,: 

mmii.orf (1 n,,,,] lll iv,,. t i ! ,M 1( r v. () . ,., ..,,/,;:;....:,/' ""v 1 ^ 1 ^ 

In' Jill'irlrd, UK.'wi:,,., i! , M M | U) -.. n., f.,,-... ,,,.a ., . ,. n ^' , ,'*. .", |uilVr| . 11 

iiHVct mi ottiiT n.nhiH-lMia '.v!,., jn ,- ,.;,.... . - .'^ " '''' ' " IM 'S 

vt'd only in iirt/.tliiilt-.l H ',..! ,,i , 

rt)in|ii-titivi' coiituiri'.' "Dii-i ', \ i .- I ;-,, 



W llor iiri- ildri|\iii:.h ,\\\\,- , -i, .;, v 

ii'iriiiully Involvi'd Xi-vr! Hit ;<, tu'f 

\vo do I'\|HT( (tint tlil (1 n,-,', >;.! t--n ,.-, > 

I'fitln-r novi'l np[iii>,'o'li v.'il) I f i n 

I Illi'llllniinl rjillii-r tin' >niti),i,| LIH | ..-,-, . , .., ,,' 

I'rovcniriit.'i tlmt imv,. !,,,,, (,,-),!.,, } r ,. 
in MX- pii'it iti.vi'nil y,Mif> hi n,,,. .\-.. r 




John M. Mnlloy 



Procurement Manage- 
ment Trends 



Coiilrnclor'H Wolffhlcd AVWIIRB 
Slmro (CVVAS). 

I would lihn to dteeiiHH th, find, of 
throo now pi-o^mm tlmt nr ntlll in 
too d.m>]o, )m <mt uta^o. () O .f tlio 
mrn promts! n ff proum'mnnl ,., 
pta which In ncnrhiK 
known a* tho ContraeLor'H 
Av<u,Kc Shave in M* 

the ouphonloiiH acronym, CWAH 
11" concept, Dimply atalcd 

that a contractor who nccwUii 
r risk contract h, a g at 
W motivation to oxcrolse p\t 
buslnesB Judgment in the L, 



K" of CI'I'T n.nharl:, hy *K1|' 
IxlilK IIMHV ll\i'il ]>rifi< mid nu'ruHv,- 
nmtviu'lH. \Vhni CWA, 1 ' I ....... ., ,.f 

iVflivo in (I,,. Anm-,1 :,VMJ.-.. i'),. 
''iii'i'iiLt'ni. Iti-Kiilufjut, |;\;:|'i(i. u ,r.in 
'"'I'Vi' to rctiix or wlili.lt.uv ,-r,i[n 
mliiiliiiiilriillvK ,(, |,, ,( ,.,,, 
ltllo|H':m MVi'l'h.'tltl niHlll't ..u tin,,,, 
nintniclorn who iitintn n v.u ir|,i!, ; 
"Wi.ljflii,.,! Avi-niH,, Sljin.:" of |jl 
'lt'iiliilri| ri.nit Ihn mix of .'MMdjur* 
'"'iHK P"i-rirtnnt. Tliuii. IK.: ,,.,,:,,( 



in 



)tv 



4 .., 

VAH IHMd.f,,, u ,|| ,,, ht) ,.,. 

*. on a vohiiiuiry !.!,*. I.,,-,,,, 
A 






wtt), MUP |in , rrt , 

, M HH^u,,,. lh , 4,^* 

- ,n, lll ,,,,.,, ( ., IM ' 

, ,,r d 
' 01 " 1 " 1 "' 1 '" "' '."v,, 



'tnu ('|t- 1 *u-| t ! Ifioiii asii(n)ilt',V Oil 
,. t M..]..- srt |B (j| l,,i ^.iiril.'d in 

l ( .':ir filltil.- If W. . r-.f.tliltall lilt' 



lnnlwjy tUMlliit.U "t Mi.' J-ndU CCII- 
'- in lt-I>|ji tH ji,.f r)(4rt (,.Mri>-( wuiilil 
i'.'slify f,.|' CWAJi, tnt.t tlM-Ki* Would 



o. I should poi t on 
hero that (hi. approach will n 
Ply lo all of Olu , 20)000 contl , acto 

lor oxamplo, a contractor whoso 
18 



ur I'r.vnrrim'iit ili.llnr^, A 

*.f BinsiMcr *'*.iu|*jinitvi will 



|rrtl r 



con- 



. JHIH i-r.-flt rrnlrrii will 
whil< (tllttrrn will mil. Kxpcrl- 
revi- 



May 196d 



on of the threshold at some future 
ate. 

We consider that the most bene- 
cial results of CWAS will derive 
litially in the relief afforded from 
^asonableness audits of certain of 
Lir cost principles. In other words, 
e will accept as reasonable the 
mount of a particular overhead cost 
icurred by contractors who are 
bove the threshold without further 
eview, The underlying assumption is 
liat the substantial proportion of 
igh risk type contracts provides, by 
;self, adequate assurance of the rea- 
onableness of incurred costs. It 
hould be clearly understood, how- 
ver, that CWAS applies only to in- 
irect costs. Of the 47 cost principles 
et forth in ASPH, 15 would appear 
o be completely subject to CWAS, 
nother 12 would be partially subject 
o CWAS, for a total of 27. Consid- 
ration has been deferred in four , 
ost principles. The balance would 
tot be subject to the CWAS test of 
easonableness due to overriding 
tatutory requirements or public pol- 
cy considerations. 

This concept will also have an 
iffect on certain ASPR administra- 
te controls. Wo are proposing 
\-SPR revisions to make CWAS 
ipplicable to Overtime Approvals, 
Changes in Make or Buy Programs, 
Review of Contractor's Procurement 
Systems and Consent to Subcontract- 
ng. In other words, the Government 
vould not involve itself in these 
iveas in the administration of the 
;ontract in the case of contractors 
vho are above the threshold of 65 
percent. We are also prepared to 
nake CWAS applicable to any other 
\SPR control that can reasonably be 
tlentified as a candidate. The EIAC 
Working Group on Administrative 
Controls, however, concluded after 
engthy study, assisted by the Air 
Force tests in this area, that the 
problem of over-control was princi- 
pally sourced in some lesser adminis- 
trative requirement than the ASPR. 

We are hopeful that this concept 
will also prove to be of interest and 
benefit to many subcontractors as 
well as to primes, Quite often, audits 
are performed by Government per- 
sonnel at the subcontract level. In 
such cases, the CWAS concept will 
apply. In addition, Government re- 
views of cost data submitted by sub- 
contractors to primes will involve 
CWAS. Likewise, it would apply to 
such administrative controls as are- 



applied at the subcontract level. 
Many of our subcontractors operate 
in a highly competitive environment 
which will almost automatically pro- 
duce a high CWAS rating. Once this 
concept is operational, we feel sure 
that our primes will find many addi- 
tional ways to take advantage of this 
approach. 

Life Cycle Costing in Equipment 
Procurement. 

The second new technique, and one 
that holds much promise for the fu- 
ture, has been publicized recently un- 
der the title of Life Cycle Costing 
in Equipment Procurement. This con- 
cept concerns itself with the influ- 
ence that changes in suppliers may 
have on logistics costs and involves 
consideration of logistics costs in 
evaluating competitive bids. You may 
recall that Title 10 of the U.S. Code, 
Section 2305 (c) states: 

", . . Awards shall be made with 
reasonable promptness by giving 
written notice to the responsible 
bidder whose bid conforms to 
the invitation and will be the 
most advantageous to the United 
States, price and other factors 
considered. . . ." (Italics supplied.') 
Traditionally, price has been the de- 
termining factor in competitive situ- 
ations and price competition has 
meant frequent changes in suppliers. 
It is those "other factors" which we 
have heretofore not been able to get 
a handle on. Hence, this is what life 
cycle costing is all about a method- 
ology for defining those other factors 
in terms of logistics cost. The sub- 
stantial increase recorded in compe- 
titive procurements in recent years 
has emphasized to us the importance 
of improving our capability to take 
these logistics costs into considera- 
tion when awarding contracts. It 
simply does not make sense to pay 
$10,000 for an equipment if the an- 
nual support coat amounts to $50,000 
when another equipment serving the 
same purpose can be acquired for 
$12,000 and an annual support cost 
of only $25,000. 

Our initial efforts in developing 
this concept will be concerned mainly 
with parts, subassemblies and minor 
subsystems which can be competed. 
But this represents in excess of six 
billion dollars annually at the prime 
level and should be of significant in- 
terest to many of you. The real task 
that must be accomplished is in de- 
veloping methods for predicting and 
measuring logistics costs for use in 



T,' i* WILVS to nioHHiin; and 
evaluating bids. W 'ay a ^ ^ 

evaluate some * Uum (ll|lfim 

more readily aviuiu " ll 
Thus as we progrreflH with llmi >u 
inns, **> w Y 

cram you will " *-' . 

fa ' i * IniviKtllMl C'UHlM Ul'*! 1 

ou,ly nnportant IOK , Ull , ,. 

not goinff to !><-. inv> 

ation of bids and proi)imlH. 

Anytime this tochniiu IH ud for 
procurem^t, tho Hoi-,lnlion will 

contain vory P^ l f". ni! | U . t "" 'I" 
to the factors to bo ul "' '"'" v]- 
uatioii. There will ho "O mirprlH.^. 
Some of the evaluation fiu-tc.ni will 
be baaed on Governnic.nt Uidl.'H IIH, 
for example, the cost of it. dim: n,w 
items to our invontovy. OLl^i-H will 
be based on contractor Hiipl-li-l Unlti. 
This type of dntu will ho voHIU'd by 
the Gavci-nmo.it, iiHiially l.y nu-ruut of 
some form oC demoiiHtral.ioii, 

Some of the loKiHticH fsu-LorH tliul. 
are susceptible to iiilhinic- by 
changes in suppliers fti'ts nt fnllowH! 

* Corrective and prtsvimtivo niuin- 
tenanco. 

* Inventory 

Inspection, i 
check-out ope] 

Training 1 . 

Transportation. 

Documentation. 

The following oxiunph 

stratcs the application of 

costing principles to a 
item : 

Navy Storage Battery 



1 1 at i<m 



Bid 

A 

B 

*C 

D 



Unit 
Price 

$29.42 
28.90 
Sl.fiG 
32.77 



Gimrnn- 
tec'il 


sis; 


21iO 
Kf.O 
400 
2fiO 


J 17(18 
.1 Hit) ft 
.07HHH 
.IrtlOft 



* Award hnsiul on lowcjit. cs*t. JHH' 
charge/diseliarjgo cycilts. 

Appivximntcily 50 .c-oinintlUivii |in>- 
ctircmonta have hncin tti'lrcU-d Hum 
far by the Military I)'|)mlnu-filH fui- 
possible award on u llfn cycl 
basis. As those te^alH ar pnu' 
the Military DopurtnitMitu un- In tlin 
process of clovoluplnK pn-dicUlilu ml 
factors for UHO in thu lent iipiillcii- 
tions. 

We consklor succ(>Hsrul li|ilimu*n- 
tation of this concept tu Iwt a 1'Hu- 
tivcly long term eil'cn-l ptu'liaiiH IIM 
much as three yours in tin* mukiiiK. 
We do not pretonU at thlx ititlul In 
time to have all tli ntntwiTH w nocd, 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



1 can assure you, however, that we 
iiit-.-nii to mako every effort to get 
tlu 1 answers :m<! to take logistics 
C'i.-ts int-'t consideration at every pos- 
siMt- njijiortunity, The concept is so 
rational mid the objectives so impor- 
tant that we are determined to press 
mi with this effort. Hy so doing, I am 
Cftnfidt'iit that in the long run siib- 
-Ht;intiii! improvement can he made 
over the traditional disregard of lo- 
giHtics cost differences in contract 
aw;ird decisions in equipment pro- 
curement, 

Total Package Concept. 

Another development of major in- 
tt-n.'st to us today is the emergence 
f*f thf.- "total package concept" of 
procurement. This method of pro- 
cim-mtnt was first employed on the 
<V,..\ aircraft and is currently being 
applied to the Navy's Fast Deploy- 
ment Logistics Ship (FDL). The 
concept, developed by the Air Force, 
provides for the initial acquisition, 
through competition, of as much of 
n total system as is possible. As con- 
trusted with our usual method of 
sfitjupntial procurement of develop- 
ment, followed by production, this 
IK--W technique involves competing at 
the outset, not only the development 
phase but also production units and 
most of the logistics support, such 
as aerospace ground equipment and 
spare parts. Conceptually, we feel 
that this method of procurement of- 
fers substantial advantages and, if 
successfully proven in practice, rep- 
resents a major breakthrough in 
contracting techniques. 

In the past, the development con- 
tract for major systems has been 
awarded under circumstances that 
made it extremely difficult for us to 
avoid awarding the follow-on produc- 
tion contracts on other than a non- 
competitive basis. The very large in- 
vestment in engineering and tooling 
costs by the initial development 
source would have to be duplicated 
by the Government, or a potentially 
competing source, making practical 
competi ion impossible. Furthermore, 
under the past practice of sequential 
awards of development, production 
and support, the contractor had no 
Positive incentive to look beyond the 
requirements of that part of the pro- 
curement cycle in which he was per 
*onnmg. Under the package procure- 
ment approach the contractor, being 
committed to the cost and perform 
ance of the production articles before 

20 



detail design begins, has a strong in- 
centive from the outset to design for 
economical production, reliable oper- 
ation and low operating and mainte- 
nance costs, all of which are strongly 
influenced by actions taken during 
the design period. The objective is to 
realize the benefits that flow from a 
production commitment earlier in the 
acquisition cycle. 

Total package contracting does 
nothing but apply to Defense pro- 
curement the concepts of a free econ- 
omy operating in a market place 
environment and subject to the law 
of supply and demand. It simply al- 
lows the Government, like any buyer 
in the commercial world, to make a 
choice between competing products 
on the basis, not of estimates, but of 
binding commitments concerning the 
performance and price of operational 
equipment including, where practica- 
ble, life-time operating costs. It es- 
tablishes these commitments compe- 
titively for as much of a prog-ram as 
practicable, and then permits the 
winning competitor's profit ulti- 
mately to be determined under an 
incentive arrangement which relates 
opportunity to risk. Profit is targeted 
initially in competition and is finally 
determined by the quality of the 
product and by the efficiency of the 
winning competitor, as it should be. 
We have already seen in the initial 
experience of this new concept that 
the discipline required of both the 
Government and the competing con- 
tractors is substantially greater than 
under past practice. We have ob- 
served that with the increased com- 
nmment required of competitors, 
proposals were substantially more 
realistic and struck a better balance 
between performance and cost com- 
mitments. 

This concept is now being used or 
contemplated for use on at least two 
other procurements, the Air Force's 
short range attack missile, and the 
Army s advanced aerial fire support 
system. Each potential application is 
based on a careful review of the 
u,ta ihty of the particular project 
*<n this approach. The extent to 
which this approach should be used 
n future DOD systems procurements 
nder study. We expect to a, y 
t to selected systems that meet cer- 
tain guulehnes now under considers 

^veTlc^ 6 ^^ 

-v* unn,c i/nti 6rH6T*ip*pii/>(i 

thlS conce P t h order to develop 



criteria for applying- .a package pin 
to future selected programs. It 
apparent that the fundamentals < 
this concept must be defined find tj 
criteria for its application develops 
Since it overlaps or interfaces wit 
other DOD procedures, such f 
source selection, contract defimtic 
and data managemen t, thuno into: 
faces must be studied to insure co) 
sistency and harmony. The probleir 
associated with this new proccdm 
must be identified and better umlei 
stood. All these factors will be! coi 
sidered in the studies now under wai 
As part of these studies, it fo ou 
intention to examine the problem 
reported by subcontractors and vend 
ors. Those will bo examined in th 
cumulative impact of not only th 
package procurement concopt, bn 
other policies and procedure* .-ilfed 
ing oi' controlling; sou ret; KL-linctioi: 
contract definition and associated ac 
Lions. 

What arc the implications of Ihi 
development for industry ? This, o 
course, will become clearer UK tit 
studies now under way proproHj) am 
as we gain experience in its UHO 01 
these initial efforts. I would vonlun 
to speculate that the concept wouli 
not be applicable initially to men 
than a half dozen major systems an 
nually. It is likely that the bush 
approach, involving- something 1 lea; 
than "total," will be used in othoi 
than major system procurements 
for example, the development am 
limited production of a major Kubayti 
tern or component. It is apparent thai 
the discipline required prior to, dur- 
ing and after selection will be mucli 
more stringent than in past practice 
It offers a truly competitive envir- 
onment in which the opportunities 
for the efficient producer are grwitlj 
enhanced, both from tho viewpoint 
of winning the competition and of the 
subsequent rewards for efficient tech- 
nical and business management, 
With the increased responsibilities 
accruing to a contractor must come 
the relaxation of Government con- 
trols which are necessary without the 
constraints of competition. Oppor- 
tunities for competent and ofllcionl 
subcontractors and vendors will be 
enhanced, since the prime will have 
considerable incentive to establish 
and stay with the most competent 
and efficient subcontract and vendor 
structure possible. 

As wo see this new concept at 
this point, it offers great potential, 



May 



It also poses a very big challenge. 
The challenge is to insure that we 
are able to define the conditions 
requisite for its use; to be able to 
structure such contracts in a way 
that they will exert a continuing 
positive i?icentive on the contractor 
to design and produce the most cost 
effective system from a life cycle 
viewpoint and, at the same time, as- 
sure ourselves that contractors are 
not assuming abnormal or extreme 
risks not subject to their control. 

As with any new concept, we are 
asking ourselves several basic ques- 
tions at the present time: 

o Will total package awards al- 
ways bo made to the low bidder, thus 
tempting the winning competitor to 
lower his quality, and give us shoddy 
equipment? We think not, This will 
be the result only if the contract is 
ignored or not enforced. Total pack- 
age contracting does not require 
awards to be made to the low bid- 
der. It does require performance and 
price commitments by competitors, 
and the award can then be made 
after considering all factors, in an 
integrated, meaningful manner. 

Will the disciplines inherent in 
total package contracting 1 stifle inno- 
vation and creative technology? This 
is a legitimate concern, but I believe 
the danger can be avoided by ex- 
pressing requirements in terms of 
performance, and by including per- 
formance incentives in the contract 
in a manner which relates improve- 
ments to their cost to the Govern- 
ment. Under the right circumstances, 
the opportunity for innovation and 
creative technology will be enhanced. 

Will the Government discipline 
itself to the realities of the author- 
ity-responsibility relationship inher- 
ent in total package contracting, that 
is, will it permit the contractor am- 
ple freedom of action to meet bis 
commitments in his own way? This 
is critical. If we place responsibility 
on the contractor, then we must give 
him the authority to carry it out. 

Are we asking for too much data 
in total package competition, or are 
the competitors furnishing too much 
or both? The answer is probably 
yes on both counts. Considerable im- 
provements can be made in this area. 

Does total package contracting 
require too much competitor effort 
during the competition ? I am the first 
to concede that a competitor must do 
a great deal of work before he can 
make commitments on a system for 



which the building blocks are in hand, 
but which has not yet been developed 
or tested as an integrated unit. But 
if contract definition is to accomplish 
its task of helping the Government 
to make a rational decision before 
proceeding with development, then 
the additional work needed for a com- 
petitor to make binding commitments 
on production units can be within 
reasonable bounds. 

A related question: Is this type 
of competition too expensive at both 
the prime and subcontract level ? In 
view of the stakes, often including 
potential commercial sales, it is diffi- 
cult to say how much is too much. 
Furthermore, in a free competitive 
economy, should the customer try to 
restrain the competition? Perhaps 
the Government should pay more for 
the help it receives in making a de- 
cision to proceed. In any event, we 
are giving close attention to this as- 
pect, 

Is too much time required for us 
to pick a winner after all the pro- 
posals arc in? On the C-5, it took 
five months. During this period, the 
competitors held much of their teams 
together, at great cost. Whether this 
can be improved, I do not know. I 
suspect so, if we emphasize per- 
formance rather than equipment 
specifications. 

The last question is, how far can 
we go in applying this technique? It 
must be limited to cases where the 
technical factors and risks, and the 
product, can be denned within rea- 
sonable limits. Above all else, we 
must be sure that we continue to ac- 
quire superior weapons. However, in- 
creasingly over the past several 
years, DoD has embarked on advanced 
development programs intended to 
establish experimentally the feasibil- 
ity of subsystems and components 
before full development is initiated. 

To sum up on this subject, it has 
been demonstrated thus far to our 
satisfaction that the package pro- 
curement concept is feasible and 
workable. It offers a potential that 
we intend to utilize fully. The deci- 
sion to apply this concept,. its impact 
upon contractors and subcontractors 
throughout the entire procurement 
process must all be carefully pre- 
planned and integrated into the con- 
tract definition phase and reconciled 
with other existing DOD policies 
where an interface exists. 



Dale Standardization 

(Continued from Page 17) 

Organizational Entity," which is 
used in almost every DOD system. 
Many of the data elements impact 
more broadly than DOD systems 
entering data systems throughout 
the Federal Government and some 
even through industrial data systems. 
Defense organizational entity is envi- 
sioned as one of these. 

The Federal Government data 
standardization program, under the 
guidance of the Bureau of the Bud- 
get (BOB), has been initiated within 
the last year. Currently, eight proj- 
ects have been undertaken in the 
same data spheres as the DOD proj- 
ects which are being coordinated and 
tied in with the Government-wide ef- 
forts. Organizational work is in proc- 
ess under the sponsorship of the 
Business Equipment Manufacturers 
Association (BEMA) to extend stand- 
ardization of data elements to the 
U. S. industrial and commercial com- 
munity through the X.3 committee of 
American Standards Association 
(ASA), Five data standardization 
projects are under development. 

An example of a data element 
project which is presently under de- 
velopment at all three levels is stand- 
ardization of calendar date. A survey 
indicated that one of the DOD com- 
ponents used 77 difTei-ent ways of ex- 
pressing date, either in format or 
character, or both. A standard ex- 
pression of date in six digits, in year, 
month and day sequence, has been 
recommended by DOD, BOB and the 
ad hoc ASA separate work groups, 
and will soon be circulated for offi- 
cial coordination. 

The DOD approach to the program 
is to standardize the data elements 
and codes in data systems under de- 
velopment; standardize those data 
elements and codes common to most 
data systems throughout DOD; and 
standardize the remaining data ele- 
ments and codes in existing opera- 
tional data systems. These steps will 
be both sequential and simultaneous, 
depending on the case. Implementa- 
tion of the standard data elements 
is a separate action from the stand- 
ardization itself. It will be under- 
taken on a scheduled basis to make 
the least impact on operational data 
systems. Implementation of standard 
data elements will be individually 
scheduled by system or by data ele- 
ment. 

To increase understanding of the 
standard element and codes program, 
briefing on its beginnings, its prin- 
ciples and its progress is currently 
being presented extensively to organi- 
zations so requesting by the Data 
Standards Division of the Office of 
the Assistant Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller). 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



21 



Army R&D 

(Continued from Page 16) 

which states a military need for ma- 
teriel whose feasibility of attainment 
is unknown or in question. This docu- 
ment is a guide for research and 
exploratory development. 

Next, the Advanced Development 
Objective (ADO) states a need be- 
lieved feasible of attainment and 
covers items to be developed for 
experimental or operational test. The 
ADO guides effort in the advanced 
development category. Third is the 
Qualitative Materiel Requirement 
(QMR), which states a military need 
for a new item, system, or assemblage 
whose development is believed feasi- 
ble. The QMR guides engineering de- 
velopment of an item for Service use. 
The fourth requirements document, the 
Small Development Requirement 
(SDR) covers minor items of proven 
feasibility. As the name describes, 
these are small developments which 
can be provided in a relatively short 
time, are not complex, and are of 
relatively low cost. 

Army requirements documents are 
normally drafted by the appropriate 
Combat Developments agency. The 
preparing agency accomplishes co- 
ordination with other interested agen- 
cies of CDC and informally with the 
developing agency. The latter pro- 
vides an early means of insuring 
interplay and exchange of concepts 
between the user and the technological 
base represented by the developer. The 
draft document is then forwarded 
through the Combat Developments 
group to Headquarters, CDC. 

Headquarters, CDC, reviews and 
modifies the document as necessary 
and then effects formal coordination of 
the requirement with the appropriate 
developing agency normally AMC It 
is at this point that CDC again profits 
by the gamut of scientific skills of the 
developing agency. The requirement is 
also coordinated with other Army 
commands, with the other Services, 
and with certain allies. 

Within the Department of the 
Army each requirement is reviewed 
by all interested agencies. Those 
requirements which will have a major 
impact on total Army resources are 
further referred to the Materiel Re- 
quirements Review Committee. This 
committee is a Chief of Staff commit- 
tee composed of general officers from 
the Army Staff and from the major 



commands concerned. When Depart- 
ment of the Army approval has been 
granted, the requirements document 
is sent to the developing agency for 
the conduct of responsible research 
and development effort. 

Systems analysis and cost effective- 
ness studies play an important part in 
the Army's definition of materiel re- 
quirements. These efforts vary in ex- 
tent and forinalization ranging from 
simple analysis of low costs, low 
density items to full examination of 
complex or high cost systems. The 
results of these studies reduce the 
unknowns and provide parameters to 
assist in decisions related to the initi- 
ation of development by answering' 
such questions as : Is tho system 
operationally suitable? Is development 
feasible? Is there a better way to 
perform the mission from a total cost 
standpoint? The Materiel Require- 
ments Review Committee, which I 
mentioned earlier, often calls for a 
review of these considerations termed 
Total Feasibility. 

The Chief of Research and Develop- 
ment has Army General Staff respon- 
sibility for the justification of tho 
R&D program to the Office of the 
Secretary of Defense and to the 
Congress. Within the Office of the 
Secretary of Defense, tho majority of 
these activities arc conducted with 
the Office of the Director of Defense 
Research and Engineering. This rela- 
tionship is carried out informally 
through personal contacts at all levels. 
Formal exchanges occur through ad 
hoc groups, memoranda, and docu- 
ments established by DOD directive. 

Related program justification typo 
actions are carried out with the Office 
of the Assistant Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller) primarily regarding 
financial matters and with the Office 
of the Assistant Secretary of Defense 
(Systems Analysis) in the areas of 
cost effectiveness and alternative nro- 
grams. * 

The Army is also responsible for 
the detailed justification of its ap- 
proved program to the various 
Congressional committees. 

Another important insight into tho 
Army R&D process lies in the area of 
program content and execution. Ap- 
proximately 38 percent of the Army 
R&D program is devoted to "National 
Programs." These are projects which 
are being conducted as Army respon- 
sibilities and which are of overall 
major importance to the national 
interest. In this list are Nike-X, the 



Army's anti-ballistic missile ny;itwn, 
and the National Htinyu at Whilu 
Sands, 

Approximately 81 pcrHit of Lliu 
program is aimed at Army develop- 
ments directly supporting Army 
responsibilities for the conduct of this 
land battle. The projui'tn I'murorniMJ 
range from relatively inoxpi-nuiv*. 1 
items such as those .for combat ra- 
tions, clothing 1 and cquipmunt to 
major developments such an 
Another 38 pure-cut of this 
provides for tin- technological luuw* 
and establishes the building blncltn 
of science and technology for I'ulum 
Army ay a turns. The remainder of Mm 
program, about eight po remit, pro- 
vides for service tenth) j? of Army 
equipment and for the uiicruUon mill 
maintommt'u of Army Kit It fucllilicM. 
AH I mentioned earlier, Hie Kivo 
Year Force Structure ami Financial 
Program furnmlutH linam:inl ivuidnmii! 
for the Army H&D program. Thin 
document is essentially an alLunipt to 
forecast in some detail tins wny tho 
Army RAD monies will l>o upcmt ovur 
tho coming live-year period. If you 
could look at tho current vrrnton, yon 
would note that the level of flimnrial 
support for testing and facility opitrn- 
tions and support for fulm'o 
is relatively stable over lh<i 
However, H tapering oil* of Army 
developments and National Progi'mim 
after 10(18 appears, ruJluuUnK UK* 
movement of novural projoctn out of 
tho high cost areas of wigiwMM'iiip: 
and operational systems dovolopmunt. 
This trend is in accordance with tliti 
Program Change PropuHiil couutpi 
whereby new programs rmiHl cmiHM- 
tuto justified additions to the ap- 
proved programs under way. 

The detailed dovolomnanl of Uin 
R&D program, inclmliiiK the llano 
Program and tho Progriuu OhanK 
Proposals, begins some 18 lo !!(> 
months prior to the year of execution. 
In this process the Army provide 
program and financial guidance to Uio 
developing agencies. Tho iirogrmmi 
are then developed In detail, originat- 
ing; at tho laboratory lovol, and arn 
successively reviewed by the Army 
Staff and tho Office of tho Socrolnry 
of Defense. 

A special management technique 
used principally by tho AMC IB proj- 
ect managership. This technique IB 
currently being applied to nomo 11 
major research and development proj- 
ects. The AMC project manuka, who 
report to the Commanding General, 



May 1966 



AMC, control all resources allocated 
to the project concerned and can call 
on other elements of AMC for assist- 
ance. Through the use of this tech- 
nique, project managers control about 
37 percent of the R&D funds made 
available to AMC. 

Each Army research and develop- 
ment project is closely monitored by 
a project officer located in the Office 
of the Chief of Research and Develop- 
ment. This officer is responsible for 
maintaining' up-to-date information 
concerning the status of the project 
concerned, for pinpointing problems 
as early as possible, and for assisting 
in the resolution of such problems. 

In addition, a system of Department 
of the Army system staff officers has 
been established to provide a focal 
point for up-to-date information on 
selected major projects. At the pres- 
ent time there are 34 items under 
system staff officer monitorship, in- 
cluding 20 containing research and 
development elements. The system 
staff officer coordinates, develops and 
maintains milestone schedules across 
the spectrum of personnel, training, 
research and development, acquisition 
and maintenance; monitors execution 
against these milestone schedules; and 
prepares consolidated periodic prog- 
ress reports on the systems concerned. 

Army technical committees meet 
monthly to maintain formal cogni- 
zance over the principal life-cycle 
events of Army materiel. In the re- 
search and development area these 
technical committees coordinate and 
record actions on the initiation and 
termination of projects and on the 
type classification of items for Service 
use. 

The Department of the Army re- 
ceives a number of periodic progress 
reports on research and development 
projects. Recurring program-wide 
reports emphasize program execution 
as well as financial status. Special 
reports cover areas such as reliability 
and maintainability. 

Another technique used to manage 
the conduct of a development project 
is the "in-process" review. This re- 
view is a periodic stock-taking analy- 
sis conducted at selected critical 
points in the development cycle to 
evaluate the status and future course 
of the project. In addition to the 
developing agency, CDC, the Depart- 
ment of the Army Staff, and inter- 
ested major field commands are repre- 
sented at the in-pi'ocess review. 

This, then, is a summary of the 
Army's R&D structure. We do not 
contend it is a perfect system ; in fact, 
we are continually seeking ways to 
improve it. However, it is a workable 
system which is producing the best 
products and that is our goal. 




The following: is the program agen- 
da for the conference on Engineering 
Systems for Education and Training 
to bo held on June 14 and 15 at the 
Twin Bridges Marriott Motor Hotel, 
Washington, D.C. The conference will 
lie sponsored by the Defense Depart- 
ment with the participation of the 
Oflice of Education and in affiliation 
with the National Security Industrial 
Association. (See article, "Industry 
Cooperation Sought To Improve Ef- 
fectiveness of DOD Education and 
Training," /V/ejjw Industry Bulle- 
tin, April 19G6.) 

FIRST DAY 

Morning Session: Keynotes. 
Government representatives: 

Hon. Thomas D. Morris, Assistant 
Secretary of Defense (Manpower), 

Hon. Harold I-Iowe, Commissioner, 
Office of Education. 

Hon. Stanley Kuttenbcrg, Man- 
power Administrator, Department of 
Labor. 

Industry representatives: 

Dr. Sterling Livingston, Harvard 
University. 

Mr. George ITallnr, Vice President 
for Advanced Technology Services, 
General Electric Co. 
Afternoon Session: Service Presenta- 



tions. 

Each Military Service will describe 
briefly the scope and magnitude of its 
overall training programs. Training 
areas of priority concern to siach Serv- 
ice will then bo discussed in light of: 

The application of advanced tech- 
nologies and management techniques 
to give industry an idea of DOD var- 
ious stages of development in these 
areas, 

The degree to which industrial 
research and development, problem 
solving and equipment capabilities 
have been used successfully. 

Anticipated priority and problem 
areas over the next five years which 
industry might want to explore. 

Speakers: 

Brig. Gen. Frank Tzenour, USA, 
Dir., Procurement, Training and Dis- 
tribution, Office of Dep. Chief of Staff, 
Personnel, Department of the Army. 

RAdm. Mason B. Freeman, USN, 
Asst. Chief for Education and Train- 
ing, Bureau of Naval Personnel. 



Maj. Gen. John H, Bell, USAF, Dir. 

of Personnel Training and Education, 
Office of Dep. Chief of Staff, Person- 
nel, Department of the Air Force. 

Col. Leo. V, Gross, USMC, Head, 
Training 1 Branch, Office of Asst. Chief 
of Staff G-3, Headquarters, U.S. Ma- 
rine Corps. 

The Office of Education will pre- 
sent its policies and plans .for various 
aspects of education technology. 

Speaker: 

Dr. R. Louis Bright, Associate Com- 
missioner of Education. 

SECOND DAY 

Morning Session: 

Adaption of Research to Technology. 
Speakers: 

Dr. Alexander Schure, Consultant, 
Office of Education, and President, 
New York Institute of Technology, 

Dr. Launor Carter, Vice President, 
System Development Corporation. 
Instructional Systems Technology. 

A panel briefing on the specific 
Service projects which have utilized 
the systems approach to training 
problems and present DOD thinking 
about future expansion of this con- 
cept. 

Computer-Itnsert Information and In- 
struction Systems. 

A panel briefing on UHO of computers 
as a management tool and as media 
for instruction in light of present 
usage, plans for expansion, trends in 
the state of the art, and particular 
problem areas for which automated 
data processing offers extreme po- 
tential. 

Summary of Highlights of the Con- 
ference. 

Speakers: 

Mr. Marvin Kahn, Chairman, Na- 
tional Security Industrial Association 
Training Advisory Committee. 

Dr. II. Louis Bright, Associate Com- 
missioner of Education. 

Hon. Thomas D. Morris, Assistant 
Secretary of Defense (Manpower). 

For additional information and at- 
tendance applications contact: 

Mr. Paul A. Newman 

National Security Industrial 
Association 

1030 15th St. NW 

Washington, D.C. 

Phone (Area Codo 202) 296-2266 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



23 




DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



Contracts of 1,000,000 ami over 
iS- " E the month of A P riI 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

1 Hyster Co., Portland, Ore. $1,567,316 141 
ensoline fork-lift trucks of 10,000 pound 

CtlTinp.itv nan^t T>n.-i1.._,l n_. ' i'"i"i 



12-rI 



wool blankets. Defense 



, 

e f 1 Vat T 0r ^- P CI , e ^ lfln(l ' Ohio. 3U6G,. 
200 electric fork-1 ft trucks, Defense 

"' f{ 1 ,?, I)l ^ Centel -' Richmond, Va! 



ponchos Centorville. Defenae Pcrsonne 
Support Center, Philadelphia. " rBonne 



w 



Mills Corp., New 



-,r t aS n ^ensc FerHonnel flu,,. 
port Center. Philadelphia, 

~?^nn% P | t ^ Umi N*w Orloana. 8,8J1.70<. 

P,?p)'qiA al! ?. n " ? f Kl i ) ': icatillE oil - Defense 
fuel Supply Center, Alexandria, Va. 

2iKflft rndllslri *!; ChicBgo. 11,818.186. 



Shi/ ''' Suill)ort ^-t". Phila- 

? a , n ^ !ver MillH > In "-. Danville Va Si 

99^nna S '," ? ent >-e, Ala. ?2,490.667. 
MA,WQ men's and 6,240 women's nvlnn 



Phllndelphtn 30 n " el Sujiport Center, 

Pcttibone M U l]iken"""Corp., Government annn-.W' "^ ^ ^^Itm^ll'. 

Defenae Products Di v ., Waahlneton, ^ !c DeeH ^ ft Cellter . Philadelphia! 

gK"id 7 ai!f t^di^ 

LltV_ ll^fnnb^ T>^, ^_ i r, c "_. "-"*" 



^ ren f on J exlile Engineer & Mfg Co 

Trenton N.J. $1,368,022. 70,700 nylon-duck 

-"' 



H 1 shcs ' Philadelphia. S1,S18,0&0. 
rfiS n^" tw l U ' 

sfedjpft?" Pe 

Entaieott Johnson Corn,, 

' 



RSI 






,p]y COM,,., 



ss. r-"- G " 

5 Cleary Uniform Co,, New Yoi-k nr 
191,000 30,000 m ' an "> ^ wool S 
overcoats, ifew York City. DefensePer 
nel SuppMt Center, Philadelphia. 

~ 



ka. Ind. 



.- N.C. 
"nen'H wh to under- 



ARMY 



Wo " 



' N.J- S1,S08,371. 



d ' triM ' 



Mich. 



n' u. 

jch. Army Mobility Oomntand 

Mnrtin-Mnrletia, Orlando, Pin. 

C 



000 



o.. New 
" 



A -, 

& , Soila ' Vineland, N,J, 51.1SM23 
m'a wool troplcaf coats. Vlnehnd 
Personncl Su ^ C C nt e r; n pS 

C t r|>>h ">'Ston, Tex. $2.851,110 



o8!"i n B6 e S r ft Co " P^aount. Calif. 
n & Co., Dallna *i 



Vinncll, McNamara, Mnnnix, and Fuller 
Alhambra, Calif. $20,816,778. Work on 
the John Day Lock and Dam Project 

" 



Blu . ff ' Al ' k - ?1.463,000. Altora- 
W0rk on 



n Co " 



" * Ovlr- 



--Soc 



Mobil 



Co., 



York 






ment A S n A' mm ?on 
ment & Supply Agency, Jollet. Ill 

~ TTi * " 



Co 



, 
Ann-tank 



cr o ron, Ohi 
Metal parts. for nieh exnloal 



au Clnlre, 
o artlllw^ 
n Procure- 

, Ohio. 






cy 






, Pa. |l,. 

. Pottstown. 



DlvWon o 



. 

Louia, 

f 1 ^ tt , ; 

& Supply Agency, Joliet, 



Indianapolis, Ind. 
onaer asaembliea. 



Ark. 



24 



May 1966 



Industrial Metal Fabrication Co., Newark 
N.J. 51,500,280. Shipine and storage 
containers. Wayne, N.J. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, III. 

Tcnieo, Inc., Nashville, Tenn, 1,771 it!)7 
Artillery illuminating sheila. Nashville 
Ammunition Procurement & Suiinlv 
Agency, Joliot, 111. 

Kisco Co., St. Louis. SI. 273,702. Artillery 
cartridge metal parts. St. Louis. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 

Stelma, Inc.. Stamford, Conn. $2.016,900. 
Telephone-telegraph terminals. Stamford. 
Army Electronics Command, Philadelphia. 
Caterpillar Tractor Co., Pcoria, 111. 22,- 
187,500. Tractors. Peoria. Army Mobility 
Equipment Center, St. Louis. 
Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, 
Calif. 82,218,160. Basic research in surveil- 
lance processes. Menlo Park. Army Re- 
search Office, Durham, N.C. 
Federal Laboratories, Salisbury PH. 1,- 
096,049. Hiincl grenades. Salisbury. Edge- 
wuod Arsenal, Mil. 

AVCO Corp., Stratford, Conn. 6,002,589. 
1-53-L-ll and T-63-L-13 engines for the 
UH-1 helicopter. Stratford. Army Avia- 
tion Materiel Command, St. Louis. 
United Aircraft, Sikorsky Aircraft Div.. 
Stratford, Conn. $1,790.000. Long lead 
time items and components required for 
manufacture of CH-54A helicopters. Strat- 
ford. Army Aviation Materiel Command, 
St. Louis. 

United Aircraft, Pratt Whitney Aircraft 
Div., East Hartford, Conn. 1,210,000. 
Additional work on long lead time items 
and components renulred for manufacture 
of model ciiRines for 01-1-54 aircraft. Enst 
Hartford. Army Aviation Materiel Com- 
mand, St. Louis. 

Eureka Williams Co., Bloomlnglmi, III, 
4.2,092,451. Bomb fusses find miscellaneous 
components, Hloomlngton. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, III, 
Albion Malleable Iron Co., Albion, Mich 
al, 732,340. Body and band assemblies for 
81mm projectiles. Albion and North Rich- 
mond, Incl, Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 
4 Bell Helicopter, Division of Bell Aerospace 
Corp., fort Worth, Tex. $1,204,800. IIU-1 
aircraft hub assemblies. Fort Worth 
Army Aviation Materiel Command, St. 
Louis, 

Fin re-Northern Div., Atlantic Research 
Corp., West Hanover, Mass, 1,031,723. 
Bomb case and fui-.o assemblies. West 
Hnnover. Ednewnod Arsenal, Md. 
Universal Induntries, Chicago. 81,018,760. 
Telephone terminals. Chicago. Army Elec- 
tronics Command, Philadelphia. 
American Mfu. Co., Fort Worth, Tex 
51,476,300. 2.75 rocket warherids. Port 
Worth. Ammunition Procurement & Sup- 
ply AEency, Joliet, 111. 

Lehigli, Inc., Easton, Pa. 1,1590,000. 2.76 
rocket warheads, Eiiston. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 
-Biilova Watch Co., Jackson Heights, N Y 
SU38.DOO. 2.7f> rocket fuzes. Woodslde, 
N.Y. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Aftency, Joliet, III. 

AVCO Corp., Richmond, Ind. 31,204,128. 
2.7G rocket fuzes, Richmond, Ammunition 
I roeiirement & Supply Agency, Jolict, 111. 
nV!. n i" ton Wnteh Co., Lancaster, Pa. ],- 
206,841. 2,75 rocket fuzes. Lancaster. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agen- 
cy, Joliet, 111. 

Westclooh Div., General Time Corp., Ln- 
s l'o, 111. 81,878,710. 2.7C rocket fuses. 
LnSn le. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 
?= Covp>1 Cincinnati, Ohio. $1,235,807. 
.75 rocket fuzes. Cincinnati. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Jollot, 111. 
OHn Mntlileson Chemicnl Corp., Associated 
Products Div., East Alton, III. $1,807,GGC. 
81mm mortnr fusion. East Alton. Ammu- 
nition Procurement & Supply Agency. 
Joliet, III. 

Olln Mathieson Clicminnl Corp., Aflsoeinted 
Products Div., Enst Alton, III. 1,014,081. 
81mm mortal- illuminating shells. East 
Alton. Ammunition Procurement & Sup- 
ply Agency, Joliet, III. 

Chamberlain Corp., Waterloo, Iowa. 1,- 
364,460, Warhead metal parts. Waterloo. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agen- 
cy, Joliet, 111. 

Albion Malleable Iron Co., Albion, Mich 
81,100,015. Warhead metal parta. Albion. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agen- 
cy, Joliet, 111. 

Canadian Commercial Corp., Ottawa, Can- 
ada. $1,018,000. Warhead metal parts. 



Ingorsnl, Ontario, Canada. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

(jibba Mfg. & Research Corp., Janesvllle 
Wia. $1,108,702. Rocket .fuzes. Janesville. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agon- 
cy, Joliet, III. 

Airport Machinery Corp., Martin, Tenn. 
51,319,060. Warhead metaJ parts. Martin. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agen- 
cy, Joliet, 111. 

Bell Helicopter Co.. Fort Worth, Tex. 
82.71.1,000. Two UH-1L prototype heli- 
copters. Fort Worth. Army Aviation 
Materiel Command, St. Louia, 

Motorola, Inc., Scottsilole, Aria. 51,440,000. 
Radar data receiving and transmitting 
field. Scottsdnlc. Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Fort Monmouth, N.J. 

Cutler-Hammer, Inc., Deer Park, NY 
1,000,000. Radar sots, battery assemblies! 
Held maintenance kits, test facility kits 
nnd ancillary items. Deer Pai-lt. Army 
Elcelronlca Command, Fort Monmouth. 
N.J. 

Chamberlain Corn., Waterloo, Iowa. SB - 
11)0,100. Warhead metal parts. Waterloo 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agen- 
cy, Jolict, 111. 

American Hoist & Derrick Co., St. Paul, 
Minn. Sfi, 292,800. Wheel-mounted 20-ton 
cranes. Fort Wayne, Ind. Army Mobility 
Equipment Center, St. Louis. 

B Herbert R. Inibt, Inc., and Nittnny Mate- 
rials, Inc., Stnte College, Pn. 5-1,884,215. 
Work on the Hlnnclmrd Hcnervoir Project. 
Blanchard, Pa. Engineer Dlsl., Baltimore, 

Kaiser-Jeep Corp., Toledo, Ohio. $2,742,- 
596, 43G various body types, 2^-ton 
truelfs with Government furnished endues. 
South Bend, Ind. Army Mobility Com- 
mand, Warren, Mich. 

7 LaCi'Ossc Dredging Corp., Chicago. SI - 
403,802. Work on the Minnesota Ulver 
1 i-oject. Near Minneapolis, Minn. Engi- 
neer Dist., St. Paul, Minn. 
Johnson Furnace Co., Bellc-vue, Ohio. $1,- 
7113,710. I'/o-ton envgo trailers, lielloviie 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Warren, 
Mich. 

~~f,!n vcn ?, MfBt Co " Kdenubm-B, Pa. $1,672.- 
K. 'A-ton enrffo trailers. Ebensburg. 
Army 1 unit AuotmotJve Center, Warren, 
Mich. 

~fi Mi n ?f?i ftI JJ ^,, Corp " M "B*eiwn, Mich. 
SI, 091,107. Multi-fuel engines for the Ii- 
ton truck. Muskegon. Army Mobility 
Command, Wnrren. Midi. 

Kaiser-Jeep Corp.. Toledo, Ohio. $15,074,385. 
J'ivu-ton trucks with Government fur- 
i , c i! on lj? lne s- South Bend, Ind. Army 
Mobility Command, Warrtm, Mich. 

~J. nV^n C 1- |) " Nomioi't Bench, Calif. ?!,- 
OD3.G52. Vjirmm mmntltloa of spnre parts 
for tie SHILLELAGH mlsallc system. 
Jjiiwndnle, Calif, Soutlnvest Procurement 
Agency, Pasadena, Calif. 

Gibraltcr MIR Co., Port Huron, Mich. 
$1,009,100. 15,505 wheel sprockets for 
various combat vehicles. Port Huron. 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Warren, 
Mich, 

S-- -Bell Helicopter Co., Fort Worth, Tex. 32,- 
088,180. Transmission nsscmblloa nnd tail 
boom Hsesmlillcs foe the UH-1 helicopter. 
Fort Worth. Army Aviation Command, 
St. Louis. 

Hercules Powder Co., Wilmington, Del. 
$2,075,792, Miscellaneous pronclliints and 
explosives. Radfonl, Vn. Ammunition 
Procurement & Simply Agency, Joliut, III, 

Collins Radio Co., Cedar Rnpida, Iowa. 
$1,172,202. Miscellaneous repair parts and 
siteciiil tool liata for the AN/AUC-102 
radio set. Cedar Rapids. Procurement 
Detachment, Chicago. 

Sylvnnla Electric Products, Ncedhnm, 
Mass. 52,500,000. ClnBsillccl electronic 
equipment. Necdham. Army Electronics 
Commnml, Fort Monmouth, N.J. 

11 Mnrcrnont Corp., Saco, Maine. $1,130,604, 
MOO machine suns, nnd barrel and bipod 
assemblies. Snco. Army Weapons Com- 
mnnd. Rock Island, 111. 

U.S. Rubber Co., New York City. $2,411,- 
08Q. Various quantities of explosives and 
support (services* Joliet, 111. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Trldcn Electronics Co., South Pnandcna, 
Calif. $1,260,000. Radio beacons and an- 
cillary itemH. South Pasadena. Army 
Electronics Command, Philadelphia, 

Standard Products Corp., Cleveland, Ohio. 
$8.637,008. Track sections for the M1U 
personnel carrier. Port OUnton, Ohio, 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Army Tank Automotive Center, Wnrren. 
Mich. 

12 Hamilton Watch Co., Lancaster, Pa. $1,- 
526,932. Mechanical time fuzes. Lancaster. 
Prankford Arsenal, Philadelphia. 
Biilova Watch Co., Woofoldo, N.Y. $1.- 
986,360. Mechanical time fuzes. Woo-dslde. 
Frnnkford Arsenal, Philadelphia. 
Condcc Corp., Stamford, Conn. $10,004,270. 
LARC V amphibious vehicles. Schenectndy, 
N.Y. Army Mobility Equipment Center, 
St. Louis. 

13 Raytheon Co., Lexington, Maes. $16,043,- 
446. Selected items of pround support and 
Held maintenance equipment for the Ilnwk 
missile system. Andover, Mass, and Wal- 
tham, Mass. Army Missile Command, 
HuntsvHle, Ala. 

Hoytlicon Co., Lexington, Mass. $2,847,'i08. 
Guidance and control syatcma for the 
Hawk missile system. Andovei-, Mass, 
Army Missile Command, Huntsville, Aln. 

Chandler Evans, Inc., West Hartford, 
Conn. 53,114,000. Fuel control units for 
UII-1 helicopters. West Hartford. Army 
Aviation Command, St. Louis. 

Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp., 
Both Pajce. N.Y. $8,820,000. Production 
of OV-1C Mohawk aircraft. Beth Page. 
Army Aviation Materiel Command, St. 
Louis. 

LcToiirncau-WcstinRhouse Co., Peoria, 111. 
35,247.000. 330 earth moving scrapers. 
Toccoa, Ga. Army Mobility Equipment 
Center, St. Louis. 

Philco Corp., Newport Bench, Calif. $2,- 
077,670, Grenade launchers and barrels. 
Anaheim, Calif. Army Weapons Com- 
mand, Itoek Island, 111. 

Continental Motors Corp., Muakepron, Mich. 
$2,403,002. Engine aBHcmblios with acces- 
sories for Vi-ton trucks. Muskcgon. Army 
Mobility Command, Warren, Mich. 

Boll Helicopter Co., Fort Worth, Tex. 
$140,000,000, Continued production of UH 
1H and UII-1D helicopters. Port Worth. 
Army Aviation Materiel Command, St. 
Louis, 

Bell Helicopter Co., Fort Worth, Tex. S20,- 

430.000. UH-1H helicopters. Fort Worth. 
Army Aviation Materiel Command, St. 
Louis. 

14 Hupp Corp., Canton, Ohio. $2.032,843. 
2,080 ten-horsepower engines and 2,188 
twenty-horsepower engines. Canton. Army 
Mobility Equipment Center, St. Louis, 

16 Mimon & Hanftcr-- Silos Mason & Co,, Inc., 
New York City. 32,393,877. Ordnance 
items and for operation and maintenance 
activities. Grand Island, Neb, Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supuly Anency, Joltot, 

Chamberlain Corp., Waterloo, Iowa. 22,- 

087.001. Metal parts for m-tillery pro- 
jectiles. Scranton, Pa. Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, Joliet, III. 

National Presto Industries, Eiui Olnirc. 
WIs. ?7,G02,170. Metal parta and compo- 
nents for 8-Inch projectiles, Eau Clnire. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Ac<m- 
cy, Joliet, III. 

11CA, Camdcn, N.J. $1.3-18, 400, Rndlo 
sets and repair parts. Gnindcn. Army 
Electronics Command, Philadelphia. 

Champion Co., Springfield, Ohio. 1,1140.- 
OS3, Shipping and storage containers for 
bomb dispensers, Springfield. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Aftency, Jollot, 

Horg Warner Corp., Dellcwood, 111. SI.. 
(100,000. Metallic belts for 20nim cartridges. 
Bellewood. Frankford Arsenal, Philadel- 
phia. 

Vinncll Corp., Alhambra, Calif. $1,121,293, 
Deslun of an electrical land distribution 
system and procurement of nil electrical 
material required for the ayntcm. Alham- 
bra. Army Mobility Equipment Center, 
St. Louis. 

AVCO Corp., Stratford, Conn. $8,005,4*0, 
Modification kits for- T63 engines, $1,121,- 
004. Rotor blades for TC3 engines. Strnt- 
ford. Army Aviation Materiel Oommtind, 
St. Louis. 

Philco Corp., Newport Bench, Calif. $1,- 
080,400. Engineering services for the 
Chaparral Air Defense System. Newport 
Bench. Army Missile. Command, HuntsvlUe, 
Ala. 

Chamberlain Corp., Waterloo, lown. $0,- 
3G3.703. I7fimm projectiles. Scran ton, Pa. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agen- 
cy, Jollot, 111. 

Chamberlain Corp., Waterloo, lown. J2,- 
404,466. 4.2-inch Illuminating cartridge 
bodies. Waterloo. Ammunition Procure- 
ment & Supply Agency, Jollot, 111. 



25 



18 Fcnlsc & SciBSon, Inc., Tulsa, Okln. $2,- 
670,469. Work on the Laurel River Reser- 
voir, Kentucky, Project, CorbSn, Ky. Engi- 
neer Diat., Nashville, Tenn. 

Mason & Hanger, Silns Mason & Co., Inc., 
New York City. S3,flB4,033. Various ord- 
nance Items. Burlington, Iowa. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, Jolict, 
111. 

Thlokol Chemical Corp., Bristol, Pa. S10.- 
093,347. Various aunntities and types oi 
illuminating cartridges and signals. 
Marshall, Tex. Ammunition Procurement 
& Supply Agency, .Jolict, 111. 

Ford Motors, Dearborn. Mich. $12,380,812. 
Vi-ton trucks, Highland Park, Mich. Army 
Mobility Equipment Center, Warren, Mich. 

Clark Equipment Co., Benton Harbor, 
Mich. 817,000,000, Industrial wheeled 
tractors. Benton Harbor. Army Mobility 
Equipment Center, St. Louis. 

AVCO Corp.. Richmond, Ind. $1,421,469. 
Metal parts (or 40mm projectiles. Rich- 
mond, Ammunition Procurement & Sup- 
p-ly Agency, Joltet, 111. 

Amron Corp., Waukeaha, WIs. $1,971,884. 
40mm cartridge cases, Waul:csha. Ammu- 
nition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Jollet, III. 

EUen Bros,, Lodi, N.J. $2,086,139. 40mni 
projectile assemblies. Lodi. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Jollet, II!. 

Eastern Tool & Mfg. Co., Belleville. N.J. 
$1,478,638. 40mm metal parts. Belleville. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agen- 
cy, Joliet, III. 

Burroughs Corp,, Pnoli, Pa. $1,600,000. 
Automatic message processing system and 
ancillary items. Paoli. Army Electronics 
Command, Fort Man mouth, N.J. 

Frank Briatoe Co., Newark, N.J. $5,602,- 
024, Construction of a field house with 
mwlti-purpoge athletic facilities nt the 
Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, 
Colo. Engineer Dial., Omahfi, Neb. 
IB Carnegie Institute o f Technology. Pitts- 
burgh, Pa. $1,684,1)00, Research in Inn- 
Biiage programming. Plttabursh. Defense 
Supply Service, Washington, D.O, 

Zook Bros. Construction Co., Great Falla, 
Mont. $2,278,037. Excavation and clear- 
Ing work on the Libby Dam Project, Libby, 
Mont. Ensineer Dint.. Seattle. Wash. 

Frwehauf Corp., Detroit, Mich. $5,108,840. 
5,000-Ballon fuel tank semi-trail era. Oma- 
ha, Neb. Army Tank Automotive Center, 
Warren, Mich. 

Walsh Construction Co,, New York City 
anJ S. J, Groves nnd Sons Co., Minnea- 
polis, Minn. S4a.00a,727. Tunnel con- 
struction and relocation work on the 
LtLby Dam Project. Libby, Mont, Engi- 
neer Dlst., Seattle. Wash. 

B, A. Heintz Construction Co., Portland, 
Ore, $4,047,191. Relocation and construe- 
tion work on the Libby Dnm Project, 
Libby, Mont. Engineer Dlst., Seattle, 
Wash. 

Granite Construction Co., Wataonvllle, 
Calif. $3,11B,G40. Work on the Alamcda 
Creek Project. Fremont, Calif, Engineer 
Diet., San Francisco. 

20 Hughes Aircraft Co., Pullerton, Calif. 
$3,118,760. Radio acts with power supply 
and receiver transmitters with ancillary 
itema. Pullerton. Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Philadelphia. 

Bushman Construction Co., St. Joseph, 
Mo. $1,018,487. Work on the Elkhorn 
River Basin Flood Control Project. Nor- 
folk, Nob. Engineer Dist., Omaha, Neb. 

Brandt Construction Co., nnd John H. 
Brandt, Lincoln, Neb. $1,447,604. Work 
on the main ctnm of the Branch Oak 
Reservoir Project, Lincoln, Neb. Engineer 
Dint, Omaha, Neb. 

Eugene Luhr nnd Co.. Sacramento, Calif. 
18,712,909. Work on the Redwood Channel 
Project. Orick, Calif. Engineer Disk, San 
Francisco, 

Western Electric Co,, New York City. 
82,760,000. NIKE HERCULES Improved 
modification kits. Burlington, N.C. Army 
Mi&aile Command, Huntaville, Ala. 

Marando, Inc., Washington, D.C, $1,898,- 
830. Construction of a four-story, 700 
occupant enlisted women's barrack, PoTt 
Myer, Va. Engineer Diat., Norfolk, Va. 
21 Hercules Powder Co., Wilmington, Del. 
59,312,152. 2.76-inch roc-ket propellant 
grains and operation and maintenance 
activities at the Sunflower Army Am- 
munition Plant, Lawrence, Kan. Ammuni- 
tion Procureemnt & Supply Agency, Jollet, 

AVCO Corp., Cincinnati, Ohio. $a,662,88&. 



Fixed-base mounted antennae, Cincinnati. 
Army Electronics Command, Philadelphia. 
Raytlieon Co., Lexington, Mass. $1,004.115. 
Maintenance nnd modification of special 
tooling and test equipment to support 
HAWK missile systems. Andover, Mass. 
Army Missile Command, Hmitsvillc, Aln. 

Haldwn Warren Co., San Francisco. ?2,- 
067,fi9S. Work 011 the Walnut Creek 
Channel Project, Contra Costa County, 
Calif. Engineer Dlst., Sacramento, Calif. 

Client her Mfg Co., Buchanan, N.Y. ?!,- 
060,460. 18,703 cargo parachute releases. 
Iliichannn. Army Aviation Materiel Com- 
mand, St. Louie. 

Spcrry Rand Corp., Phoenix, AH'/.. $1,432.- 
276. Gyro magnetic compass seta with 
ancillary items. Phoenix. Army Elec- 
tronics Command, Fort Monmouth, N.J. 
22 AVCO Corp., Cincinnati, Ohio. $3,080,- 
755, 4,869 receiver transmitters with an- 
cillary items. Evendale, Ohio. Army 
Electronics Command, Philadelphia. 

Stromlierg Carlson Corp., Rochester, N.Y. 
$3,8CO,!MO. Sixteen fixed-plant telephone 
systems including installation, spares, 
commercial literature, maintenance tools 
and service tests. Rochester and Southeast 
Asia. Army Electronics Command, Port 
Monmouth, N.J. 

Continental Motori, Musk eg on, Mich. $2,- 
425,000. Engines with containers for 
M60A1 and M48A3 tanks. Muskcgon. 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Warren, 
Mich. 

A run del Corp., Baltimore, Md. nnd L. E. 
Diion Construction Co., San Gabriel, 
Calif. $17,195,034. Work on the Claiborne 
Lock and Dam Project, Claiborne. Ala. 
Engineer Dist., Mobile, Ala. 

Orr & Sembower, Reading, Pn. $4,026,621. 
1,422 liquid dispensing tank and pump 
units for truck mounting. Reading, Army 
Mobility Equipment Center, St. Louis. 

II. B. Zachry Co., San Antonio, Tex. S2,- 
044,350. Facility requirement in support 
of expanded aviator training at 10 sepa- 
rate sites. Fort Welters, Tex. Engineer 
Dlst., Fort Worth, Tex. 

26 Amoa Construction Co., Oklahoma City, 
Okla. $2,370,421. Runway and taxlwny 
construction am] lighting. Sheppard APB, 
Tex. Engineer Diat., Albnrquerque, N.M. 

Pool* & Kent Co., Miami, Fla. $1,030,000. 
Work on the C&S Florida Flood Control 
Project. Clewlston, Pin. Engineer Dist., 
Jacksonville, Fin. 

Troup Bros., Coral Gables, Fla. 51,073,186. 
Construction and excavation work on the 
C&S Florida Flood Control Project. 
Miami, Pin. Engineer Diat., Jacksonville, 
Fla. 

Bask Engineering & Construction Co., 
Logan, Utah. Sl,4Cfi,E27. Construction of 
a logistic and shop complex. Hill AFB, 
Utah. Engineer Dlst,, Sacramento, Calif. 
28 Western Electric, New York City. $8,445,- 
267. Research and development in con- 
nection with the Nike X System. Whip- 
pany, N.J. and Redondo Beach, Calif. 
Nike X Project Office, Huntsville. Ala. 

- Sperry Rand, New York City, $11,410,868. 
166mm, 105mm and IGmm ammunition 
components. Shrcveport, La. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

San Ore Construction Co., Gardner Engi- 
neering Corp., nnd DBA S.O.G. of Okla- 
homa, Houston. Tex. $10,760,878. .Work 
on Webbers Falls Lock and Dam-Arkansas 
River, Oklnhoma Project, Engineer Diat.. 
Tulaa, Okln. 

OHn Mathteson Chemical Corp,, East Al- 
ton, 111. $1,321,637. Propellant for 20mm 
cartridges. Eaat Alton. Prankford Ar- 
senal, Philadelphia. 

Pace Corp., Memphis, Tenn. $4,167,867. 
Illuminating signals. Memphis. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, Joltet, 

Michael Harmonay Corp. and Ralsler 
Corp., N.Y. $2,403.300. Work on the 
heating 1 system for the new barracks at 
the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, 
N.Y. Engineer Dlst., New York City. 

Allls Chalmers Mfg. Co., Birmingham, Ala. 
42,020,000. Design, manufacture, delivery, 
installation and test of two generators for 
the Carters Dam and Reservoir, Coosa- 
wattee River, Ga., project. West Allis, 
Wia. and Carters, Ga. Engineer Diat., 
Mobile, Ala. 

Canadian Commercial Corp., Ottawa, On- 
tario, Canada. $1,408,830, Tube assemblies 
Jor ordnance items. Toronto. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, Jollet, 

Harvey Aluminum, Torrance, Calif. J2,- 



263,494. Ball projectiles for 20mm cart- 
ridges. Torrance. Frnnkford Arsenal, 
Philadelphia, 1 

Brown & Root, Inc., Houston, Tex. ?!,- 
072.000. Expanded nvintor training facili- 
ties nt Mineral Wells Airport consisting 
of hanger, aprons, aircraft park and J'OL 
facilities at Fort Walters, Tex. Engineer 
Dist,, Fort Worth, Tex. 

27 Action Mfg. Co., Philadelphia. (1,443,606. 
80mm anti-tank projectile fuzes, Phila- 
delphia. Army Ammunition Procurement 
& Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Philco Corp., Communications & Electron- 
ics Div., Willow Grove, Pa. 36,000,000. 
Automatic digital message switching cen- 
ters. Willow Grove. Army Electronics 
Command, Fort Monmouth, N.J, 

Guy F. At Is ins on Co., Long Beach, Cnllf. 
$4,070,405. Construction on Coyote Creole 
Channel, Los Angeles County, CaJif. 
Buena Vista. Calif. Engineer Dlst., LOB 
Angeles. 

S. J. Groves & Sons Co., Springfield, III. 
811,617,104. Construction on Shelbyvllla 
Reservoir project, lEnsknskitt River, II!. 
Shelbyville, 111. Engineer Dlst., St. Loula. 

Colt's Inc., Hnrtford, Conn. $1,224,000. 
M-lfl and XM16E1 rifle magazines, Hurt- 
ford. Army Weapons Command, It a etc 
Island, 111. 

General Cable Corp., New York City ?4.- 
226,240, Cable assemblies. Rosello, N.V. 
Army Electronics Command, Fort Mon- 
mouth, N.J. 

Gfbbs MfR. & Research Corp., Janeuvllle, 
Wis. $1,661,818. 2.7G rocket fuzes. Janca- 
ville. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Joliet, 111. 

KDI Corp., Cincinnati, Ohio. $1,G17.3'71. 
2.7I> rocket fuzeH. Cincinnati. Ammunition. 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, III. 
28 Pfend & Brown, Inc., Milford, Ind. $1.040, 
47fl. Work on the Solomonic Iteoervolr 
project. Wnbnsh, Ind. Engineer Dint., 
Louisville, Ky. 

AVCO Corp.. Stratford. Conn. $3,208,000. 
Repair parts for helicopter ga turbine 
engines. Stratford. Army Aviation Mfile- 
ricl Command, St. Loulit. 

General Motors, Diesel Engine Div., De- 
troit. $1,708,608, Six cylinder enjttnea. 
Detroit. Army Automotive Center, Warren, 
Mich. 

Western Electric Co., New York City. ?!,- 
100,1144. Nike- Hercules research and de- 
velopment services. UurllnRton, N.O. 
Army Mlsnilo Command, Huntsvllle, Aln. 

I.D. Precisian Components Corp,, Jamnicn, 
N.Y. $1, 144,000. 81mm mortar f warns . 
Jamaica. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, JollcL, III. 

Wilkinson Mfg. Co., Fort Cnlhoun, Neb, 
$1,102,400. Slmm mortar fimes. Fort 
Calhoun. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Jollet, 111, 

Action Mfg. Co., Philadelphia. $1,218,800. 
81mm mortar fuzes. Philadelphia, Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joltet, 111. 

Colmnbus Mllimr & MfR, Co., Columbus, 
Ohio, $1,104,000. 81mm mortar fav.ce. 
Wcatervillo, Ohio. Ammunition Procure- 
ment & Supply Agency, Jollet, III. 

REDM Corp., Wayne, N.J. $1,210,000. 
81mm mortar fuzes, Wayne. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Grand Machining Co., Detroit. $1,761,080. 
81mm mortar fin fiHBemblies. Voro Ilonch, 
Fla. Ammunition Procurement Si Supply 
Agency, Jollot, 111. 

Albion Malleable Iron Co., Albion, Mich. 
$1,380,180. Projectile body assemblies. 
Albion. Ammunition Procurement & Sim- 
ply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Wagner Electric Co., St. Louis, $2,088,270. 
4.2" mortar projectiles. St. Louie. Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joltet, 111, 

Kennedy Van Saun Corp., Danville, Pa. 
$2,628,040. 4.2" mortar projectiles. Dan- 
ville. Ammunition Procurement & Snimly 
Agency, Jollot, 111. 

Specialty Electronics Development Corn., 
Glendale, N.Y. $1,884,088. Telephone Beta. 
South Bridge, Mnsa, Army Bleotronlca 
Command, Philadelphia, 

~~? u ?Si, CI ' Ramo CorD " OftnoK" Pnrk, Calif. 

$1,088,323. Universal automatic map com- 
pilation system, Onnogn Park. Army Mni> 
Service, Corps of Engineers, Waahlnjtton, 
D.C, 

Vlnnell Corp,, Alhambra, Oallf. $1,760,000* 
Construction nnd operation of a fourth : 
echelon maintenance depot and flontlna 
dry dock. Southeast Asia. Army Mobility 
Equipment Center, St. Louis, 



May 1966 



_ Baldwin Electronics Inc., Little Rock, Ark. 
$1,225,115. 2.7B" rocket motors. Ciimden, 
Ark. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Joliet, 111. 

29 Day & Zimmerman, Inc., Philadelphia. SO,- 
203,1-12. Miscellaneous ammunition parts 
and items. Texnrkana, Tex. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Harvey Aluminum Sftles, Inc., Tovrancc, 
Calif. 52,871,030. 106mm, 106mm, -iOmm, 
81 mm sheila, nnd miscellaneous ammuni- 
tion items. Milan, 1'eun. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc., Wilming- 
ton, Del. $10.120,703. Explosives. Chat- 
tanooga, Tenn. Ammunition Procurement 
& Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Conductrom Corp., Ann Arbor, Mich. 51,- 
000,000. Classified research and develop- 
ment. Ann Arbor. Army MiBsile Com- 
mand, Huntsville, Aln. 

Hercules Powder Co., Wilmington, Del. 
53,939,202. Miscellaneous propellant ex- 
plosives. Rndford, Vn. Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Sylvanln Electronics Products, Inc., Need- 
horn, Mass. 51,000,000. Electronic cciuiii- 
ment. Needham. Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Fort Monmonth, N.J. 

Global Construction, Altadcna, Calif. 51,- 
768,161, Construction at Vandenhui'ti AFB, 
Calif. Engineer Dlst., Los Angeles. 

Belock Instrument Corp., College Point, 
NY. $1,008,000. HAWK simulator train- 
ers, College Point. Army Mlasile Com- 
mand, Huntsville, Ala. 

Hughes Tool Co., Culver City, Calif. $1.- 
800,000. Armament sub-syatcms. Culver 
City. Army Weapons Command, Hock 
Island, 111. , n t , f an 

Philco Corp., Newport lleach, Calif. 51,- 
225.GCO. Chapavral inspection equipment. 
Newport Beach. Army Missile Command, 
HuntHville, Aln. 

Chrysler Corp., Marysville, Mich. $1,158,- 
373. M113 family engines. Marysvllle. 
Army Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 

PMC Corp., San Jose, Calif. 515,000,000. 
Vehicles of the M113 family, and related 
kits. South Charleston, W. Vn. Army 
Automobile Center, Warren, Mich. 

Collins Radio Co., Cedar Rapids, Iowa. 
$3,ill8,ll)l. Direction finders. Cedar 
Rapida. Army Electronics Command, Fort 
Mon mouth, N.J. 

New Mexico State University, University 
Park, N.M. Jl, 117,223. Data reduction 
and computer aci-vicca. University Park. 
White Sands Missile Ranne, N,M. 

Chrysler Corp., Detroit. $S,GGS,HOG. Engine 
assemblies with contninera. Mnryflvllle, 
Mich. Army Automotive Center, Wnvrcn, 
Mich. 

General Motors, Allison Dlv., Indianapolis, 
Ind. $1,060,086. Various types of trans- 
missions. Indianapolis. Army Automotive 
Center, Warren, Mich. 

Raytheon Co., Burlington, Mass. $2,803,- 
033. Radio communications equipment. 
Hawthorne, Calif. Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Philadelphia. 

RCA, Camden, N.J. $3,000,400. Radio sets. 
Camdcn, Army Electronics Command, 
Philadelphia. 

LoToiirncnu-WcHtlnghoufle Co., Peoria, 111. 
S3,84D,BBS. Dloael engine road graders. 
Indianapolis, Ind. Army Mobility Equip- 
ment Center, St. Louie. 

Canadian Commercial Corp., Ottawa, Can- 
ada. $1,607,600. 2.7G" rocket warheads. 
Dundaa, Ontario, Canada. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Canndlnn Commercial Corp., Ottawa, 
Canada. $1,712,260. 2.75" rocket war- 
heads. Sarnla, Canada. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

NAVY 

I Carrier Air Conditioning Co., New York 
City, $1,046,276. Air conditioners for 
shipboard use. Syracuse, N.Y. Bureau of 
Shlpa. 

United Botttbulldera, Belllnsham, Wash. 
$1,680,000. Construction of 40 plastic river 
patrol boats. BelUngham. Bureau of 
Ships. 

M.I.T., Instrumentation Laboratory, Cam- 
bridge, Mass. $1,000,000. Desijjn and 
development of the Poseidon missile guid- 
ance system. Cambridge. Special Projects 
Office, 

Standard Products Co., Cleveland, Ohio. 
$3,000,000. Eight 120 track section repair 
kits. Port Clinton, Ohio. Marine Corps. 



4 General Precision, Inc., Librascope Group, 1 
Glemlale, Calif. $2,524,028. Torpedo fire 
control system components. Glendale. 
Bureau of Naval Weapons. 

LTV Aerospnce Corp., VouEht Aeronnutica ; 
Div., Dallas, Tex. S7.12S.2-05. A-7-A fur- 
crnft, Dallas. Bureau of Nnval Weapons. 
Eclipse Pioneer Dlv., Bendix Corp., Teter- 
boro, N.J. 2,004, 4G8, Major components 
for automatic flight control systems used 
on A-4~E/TA-1-E aircraft. Teterboro. 
Navy Avintion Supply Office, Philadelphia. 
Stelma. Inc., Stamford, Conn. $3,011,197. 
TclcKraph terminal enuinmcnt for naval 
communications. Stamford. Navy Pur- 
chasing Office, Washington, D.C. 
Westlnghnusc Electric Cor|i., Sunnyvale, 
Calif. $1. 000, 000. Development of the 
Poseidon missile launcher system. Sunny- 
vale. Special Projects Office, 
Thiokol Cliemicnl Corp., Reaction Motors 
Div., Denville, N.J. S1,S28,9GO. Bullpup 
rocltet engines. Uockawny, N.J, Bureau 
of Naval Weapons. 

G United Aircraft, Stratford, Conn. S1G.023,- 
800. CII-G3A helicopters. Stratford. 
Bureau of Naval Weapons. 
ITT Gilflllan Co., Los Angeles. $1,326, OUU. 
findai- InndinK systems for insta lint ion 
aboard aircraft carriers. Los Angeles. 
Bureau of Ships. 

7 Pnclflc Ship Repair, Inc., San Francisco. 
Sl.220.000. Topside overhrml and vepair of 
the ammunition ship USS nAINIER 
(AE-5). San Francisco. Industrial Man- 
ager, 12th Naval Diet. . 
-Chromcraft Corp., St. Louis. $4,707.000. 
Production of rocket launcherH. St. Louis. 
Burenu of Navnl Weapons. 
Snndcrs Assoclntes, Nashnn, N.H. 4.441,- 
880. Bnslc engineering and development 
of an air dropable ASW sonobuoy syatem. 
Nnalnm. Bureau of Nnval Weapons. 
Ma K rmvox Co., Fort Wayne, Ind. S4,in.; 
7G4 Haslc eimineerinff nnd development 
of nn air droppahle ASW sonobuoy system. 
Fort Wayne. Bureau of Naval Weapons. 
Aerojet General Corp., Sacramento, Calif. 
Sl,377,(iOO. NitroplaHtichei- for POLARIS 
A-3 miHsiles. Sncrnmento. Special I roj- 
ects Ofllcc. .. 
Aluminum Specialty Co., Manitowoc, Wia. 
S2,Ba4,784. 20mm link cartridge diBinte- 
gratinR bcltH used for lending 20mm am- 
munition. Manitowoc. Navy Ships Purta 
Control Center, Mcchanlc B burg, Pa 
Ilascltiiic Corp., Little Neck, N.Y. $3,002,- 
1 22 Sonar transducers for Instill 1 ntion 
aboard naval ships. Bi'aintree, Mnss. and 
Little Neck. Itureau of Ships. 
Aluminum Shapes, Inc., Delnlr, N.J. 51.- 
225,310. AM-B aluminum extrusions for 
airfields. Delair. Naval Air Engineering 
Center, Philadelphia. 

May Aluminum, Inc., El Campo, fex. $2.- 
104 320. AM-2 aluminum extrusions lor 
airfields. 151 Campo, Nnvnl Air Engineer- 
ing Center, Philadelphia. 

Kaiser Aluminum & CJiomlcnl Sales, Inc. 
Hnlclhorpe, Md. $2,473,090 AM-2 alumi- 
num extrusions for airfields. Halethorue. 
Naval Air Engincoriiig Center, Phlladel- 

Southern Extrusions, Inc., Magnolia, Ark. 
Sl.4fl2.230. AM-2 aluminum extrusions for 
ftlrfiiolds. Magnolia. Naval Air Engineer- 
ing Center, Philadelphia, 

H Mngnavox Co., Fovt Wnyno Ind. ?l.''oO,- 
300. Clasfliiled project. Bureau of Naval 
Weapons. 

11 Teletype Corp., Skoklo. 111. $2,243,022. Tele- 
type equipment for installation aboard 
eurfaca ships. Skokio. Bureau of Ships. 
General Motors, LnGrangc, III. S3,pa^,700. 
Non-magnetic propulsion diesel cnBinea for 
ocean minesweoperB, McCook, 111. Bureau 

WeJttlngiiousc Electric, Baltimore, Mil. $3,- 
800,000. Long lead time- items and oirort 
for procurement of airborne radar sots for 
the Air Force. Baltimore. Bureau of 
Naval Weapons. ,.., onD 

Stewart-Warner Corp., Ohlcago. $1.648,308. 
Components for the ARN-G2 aircraft navl- 
Batlonnl set, Chicago. Navy Purchasing 
Office, Washington, D.C. 

12 Unlveranl Match Corp., Ferguson, Mo. $3,- 
4G1.94B. Launching gi'oups and a control 
pnnel to be installed on ships for missile 
launching. Ferguson, Navy Purchasing 
Office, Washington, D.O. 

United Aircraft, Pratt & Whitney Div., 
East Hartford, Conn. $1,006,140. Miscel- 
laneous spare parts for the J-67 engine 
used on B-62 and KC-1BB aircraft. East 
Hartford. Navy Aviation Supply Office, 
Philadelphia. 



1 



fleet ballistic missile BU ^/. lU.rca * 
equipment. Now London, Conn. Huicau 



Un Aircraft, Eaat Knrttord. Cnn. S^- 
070,208. J52-P8A engines, luist HniUm<i. 
Bureau. of Nnvnl Weapons- 




Silver Sin-ins, Md. and 
Bureau of Nnval Weapons. 

SEES! tt 






is General Dynnmics, Electric Wot iv., 

Groton, Conn, $30,427,000. Conatn.ril J 
a submarine tender. Groton. Iluiwin oi 

-&nl Precision, Inc., Otawtata. C^ 
82,803,083. Fire control syfitom foi the m^ 
48 torpedo. Glmulnle. Hurcnu "f Naval 
Weapons. ,. -, 

IB Sanders Associates, NaHhiia, N. U. ?-s, 
fl43,000. Research nnd development of poi 
mounted noise jammers tor Navy nlrci art. 
Nashua. Bureau of Nnval Weapons. 

-Stanford Research Inrtltntn, Menlo Park, 
Calif. $1,105,765. Additlonnl naval on or- 
ationa research. Ofllcc of Nnval Beaoitrcti. 

General Motors, Milwaukee, W in. SfS.iMi.- 
21G. Deaign, development nnd fabrlontluJi 
of two prototype ship's self-contained navi- 
gation systems for teat nnil evaluation l>y 
the Nnvy. Milwaukee. Bureau othnlvjB. 
20 nermlte Powder Co., Stuisiis, Cal If. S *.- 
218,000. JATO roekot motors fpr alicinii. 
Bmnu. Hnvy Ships Pnrts aontml Center, 
MechftuicBburK, Pa. fi. wn 

Grnmman Aircraft EnglnccrlnK Corp., 

ethpage, N. Y. $0,300.104. I.onir \** 

time effort for FY 60 procurement of A-OA 

aircrnft. BethpftBo. Bureau of Navnl 

-sSSTliand Cor,,., St. Pnul, Minn. Wr 
070,480. Hndar flre-eontrol equipment with 
associated mnterml nnd cam noorliiK serv- 
ices. St. Faul. Diit'cau of Ship". 
21 United Aircraft, Stratford, Conn. ?fl,123,- 
HOO. OH-8B and 1111-813 holleopletB '"^ 
the Air Fni'ce. Stiatford. nuroiui of Nnval 

Dortr Warner Corp., CnlciiKO. ?1, ORB ,600. 

Machine lools in aupltort it the MK 81 
bomb production proBVam. Clilcniro. llwr- 
cau of Naval WeapoitB. 

American Electric, Inc., Pnrnmmint, (,alir. 
$1,000,320. Mark 11 fire bomlm. 1 ill-a- 
mount. Navy Ordnnnco Plant. Lmmvllle. 
Ky 

Coneo Rnpineorlng; Warkn, Mondotn, 111. 
1,100,800. Marh 77 fire bombfi. MeiidotH. 
Navy Ordnance Plant, Louisville, Ky. 
CurtiBB-Wrlslit Corn,, Wooil-IttOBo, N. J. 
8,004,300. Kits to support JQG-W10 en- 
gines for A-irt/C aircrnfl. Wood-ltldito. 
Navy Avlntion Supply OfTico, Phllnilolpliln. 
General Electric, Cincinnati, Ohio. JO.Olif,- 
Ifl2, Spara parts for J70-GE10 onsluoa lu 
support F-dJ nlrcrnlt. GlnolnimtS, Navy 
Aviation Supply Ofllcc, Philadelphia. 
22 Boeing Co., Morton, Pa. $2,478,080. Ilolor 
blade droop Bnoots for IIHQ on CHyiJII-'lll 
holicoptere. Morton. Nnvy Aviation Sup- 
ply Offiee, Philadelphia, 

26 Johns Hapklna Unlvcriilty, Silver Sprlnw, 
Md. $1,208,509. RGflcnroll nnd development 
work for the Army and AUPA (Advanced 
Research- Projects Agency). Silver SlirlnK- 
Bureau of Nnval Weapons, 

Mnrlo Coll Co., St. Louis. 52,0117,0211. Air 
conditioning equipment for navnl ahlpn. St. 
Louis. Bureau of Ships. 

27 U.S. Steel Corp., Pittsburgh, Pn. $18, m,- 
170. Mnrk 82 bomb bodies, $8.078,, 780. 
Mark 82 bomb bodies. 30,2*7, 330. Mnilc 81 
bomb bodies. McKeoaport, Pn. Nnvy Ships 
Parts Control Center, MechnnicsburK, Pft. 
American t/ltg. Co., Fort Worth, Tex. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



$2,829,897. Mnrk 82 bomb bodies. $G,520,EOO. 
Mark 82 bomb bodied. Fort Worth. Navy 
Ships Parts Control Center, MecJianics- 
hiirir. Pa. 

firumman Aircraft Engineering Corp.. 
IlGthpnBO, N. Y. $5,525,01}. Long lend 
time effort for planned FY 6& and FY 67 
procurement of C-2A aircraft. $11,156.- 
028. Increase long lead time effort for 
FY 6G procurement of A-6-A weapon ays- 
alema. Bethiiage, Bureau of Naval 
Weapons. 

Norris-Thermidor Corp., Los Aniseles. $8,- 
iyO.017. Mnrk 81 bomb bodies. $7,050,443. 
Mark 82 bomb bodies. Los Angeles. Navy 
Ships, Parts Control Center, Mechanics- 
Inirg, Pa. 

Intercontinental Mfg. Co., Garland, Tex 
57.129,020. Mark 82 bomb bodies. Gar- 
land. Navy Ships Pnrla Control Center. 
Mechnnicsburt;. Pa, 

United Aircraft, Hamilton Standard Div., 
Windsor Locks, Conn. 32,118,048. Pro- 
peller systems for C-130 aircraft. Wind- 
sor Locks. Bureau of Naval Weapons 

AlResearch Mfg. Co. of Arizona, division 
of Garrett Corp., Phoenix, Ariz. $1,252,- 
015. Main parts for GTC96-2 power units 
for use in P-3-A aircraft. Phoenix. Navy 
Aviation Supply Office, Philadelphia. 

American Machinery & Foundry Co 
York, Pa. 816,970,500. Mark 82 bomb 
bodies. York. Navy Ships Parts Control 
Center, Mechanicsburu, Pa. 

Loral Electronics Systems Div., Loral 
Cor]).. Bronx, N. Y. 82,327,893. Compon- 
ents of floppier navigation radar sets for 
use on A-6 and P-3-A aircraft. Bronx. 
Navy Purchasing Office, Washington, D.C. 

Litton Systems, Westrex Communications 
Div., New Rochelie, N. Y. 51,019,473 
Tropospheric scatter communication sys- 
tem. Navy Purchasing Office, Washington, 
IJ.L. 

Litton Systems, Westrcx Communications 
Uiv., New Rochelie, N.Y. SI. 019.473. 
Tropospheric scatter communication sys- 
tem. Navy Purchasing Office, Washington, 
D.C. 

Borg-Warner Corp., In E ersoII Products 
Div., Chicago. $13,858,000. Mark 81 bomb 
bodies. Chicago. Navy Ships Parts Con- 
trol Center, Mechanicsburg, Pa. 

28-Curtlss Wright Corp., Wright Aeronautic- 
,al Div., Wood-Ridge, N. J. 52,277,608 

S^ES Ilarts to suport the JG3 - H33GO and 
K1820 engines for installation in various 
Navy aircraft. Wood-Ridge. Navy Avi- 
ation Supply Office, Philadelphia. 
ED Gyrodync Company of America, Flower- 
field, St. James, N. Y. $2,500,000. QII-60 
drone helicopters. St. James. Bureau of 
Naval Weapons. 

~ A n V n ?^ le , S f li P yard8 ' New Orleans. $3,- 
200,000. Aviation and repair of the hospi- 
tal ahip USS Sanctunry (AH-17). New 
Orlenns, Bureau of Ships. 



AIR FORCE 

1 ~!ll!l B;nnvo!t Co - Fort Wayne, Ind. $1.880- 
J69. Production of aircraft radio sets. 
rJro^ 8 ^ 8 ', . Aa "">*"al Systems Div. 
{AFSC), WHghWattevson AFB, Ohio. 

Hazeltlne Corp., Little Neck, N Y S2 - 
94S.W5. Production of aircraft commun- 
ication enuipment. Little Neck. Aero- 
nautical Systems Div. (AFSC), Wright- 
Patterson AFB, Ohio, 

Lockheed Missilea & Space Co., Sunnyvale 
Calif. $2,400,000. AGENA rocket launch 
services for IflfiG. Cocoa Beach, Fla. Space 
Systems Div. (AFSC), Los Angeles. P 

"nn'nSS 1 E J, cclric > Wat Lynn, Mass. $3,- 
000,000. Component Improvement engi- 
neering program for the J-S5 aircraft 
engine, West Lynn. Aeronautical Sys- 
AFB, Ohio ' '' WH ^t-Ptt e rson 

GoodWnr Tire & Rubber Co., Akron Ohio 





forc1 n C s 

for 0^123 aircraft. Akron. Ogden Air 
Materiel Area (AFSC), Hill AFB, Utah! 

~S1 r i al . Iltd >tr '". BarrinBton. 111. 
$1,200.000. Production of aircraft camera 
systems. Harrington. Aeronautical Sya- 
AFB, Ohb. (AFSCK Wrj sht-Patt 
4 Mflxs'on Electronics Corp., Great River 
N. Y ?1 738,257. Production of fuze a I 



28 



drone aircraft. Toledo, Ohio. Aero- 



nautical Systems Div. (AFSC), Wrlght- 

Pntteroon AFB, Ohio. 
Federal Electric Corp., Itichland, Wash. 

$1,979,760. Production of generator sets. 

Pasco, Wash. Sacramento Air Materiel 

Area (AFLC), McClellan AFB, Calif. 
Raytheon Co., Space & Information Sys- 

tems Div., Waltham, Mass. $2,924,000. 

Modification of the bomb-navigation sys- 

tem of the B-58 bomber. Waltham. War- 

ner-Robins Air Materiel Area (AFLC), 

Robins AFB. Gn. 

Sperry Gyroscope Co., Great Neck, N. Y. 
81,030,000. Modification of the bomb navl- 
Biition system of the B-58 bomber. Great 
Neck. Warner-Robins Air Materiel Area 
(AFLC). Robins AFB, Ga. 

5 Sanders Associates, Nashua, N.It. 51,600,- 
000. Production of airborne radio direc- 
tion finding equipment, Nashua. Aero- 
nautical Systems Div. (AFSC), Wright- 
Patterson AFB, Ohio. 

Sperry Hand Corp,, Great Neck, N. Y. 
$1,699,398. Production of components for 
LOHAN navigational equipment. Great 
Neck. Aeronautical Systems Div. (AFSC), 
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. 

Libby Welding Co., Kansas City, Mo. $1,- 
244,681. Production of IliO generator sets. 
Kansas City. Sacramento Air Materiel 
Area (AFLC), McClellan AFB, Calif, 

General Dynamics, Fort Worth, Tex. S3 - 
046,317, Inspection and repair of B-58 
aircraft. Fort Worth. San Antonio Air 
Materiel Area (AFLC), Kelly AFB, Tex. 

Lear Sicglcr, Inc., Grand Rapids, Mich. 
53,281,536. Production of aircraft bomb- 
ing computer seta. Grand Rapids. Aero- 
nautical Systems Div. (AFSC), Wricht- 
Pntterson AFB, Ohio. 

G ~ A , V( 1 Cor ?" St tford, Conn. $1,200,000. 
Work on the Mnrk IIA re-entry vehicle. 
Stratford. Ballistic Systems Div. (AFSC), 
Norton AFB, Calif. 

~? T OC i i m B ?" Wichitn . K n. 310,255,493. 
Moulllcation and maintenance of vertical 
tail fins for B-52 aircraft. Wichita. Okln- 



. 

Rendix Corp., Baltimore, Md. 51,205,798 
Weather radar systems. Baltimore. War- 



Stewart & Stevenson Services, Houston, 
Tex. $1,861,802. Production of electrical 
power generators. Houston. Sacramento 
AFB, CaHf' (AFLC), McClellan 

7 AVCO Corp., New York City. $3,500,000 
Research, development and production of 
the MARK 17 re-entry vehicle system. 
Wilmington, Mass, and Stratford, Conn 
Ballistic Systems Div. (AFSC), Norton 

N.Y. S2,570,D86. Production of flight In-' 
strumentca for C-H1 aircraft. Elmhurst. 
Aeronaiitical Systems Div. (AFSC) 
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio IJ " &0 '- 
Bcndix Corp., Teterboro, N. J. $2,839,202 
Production of night instruments for C-141 

terns Div (A ?''' Acl '! 1llltical Sys- 
AFB, Ohio. ' 118 >" atteraon 

9BB Production of components for air- 
craft radar altimeters. Chicago. Aero- 
nautical Systems Div. (AFSC) Wrtaht 
Patterson AFB, Ohio. '' VVUBIlt - 

8 Martin Marietta, Denver, Colo. S7,G0a,000 
Desien, development, fabrication and do- 

!L?V T1 , TAN HI Bpace booster and 
associated equipment. Denver Space Sys- 
tems Div. {AFSC). Los Angeles * 
nni"' Jnc " Hedondo Bench. Calif si 
200.000 Production of airborne tnctifai 
leeonnaissnnce equipment. Redondo Bench 
Aeronautical Systems Div. (AFSG) 
wright-P&ttGrBon APBOhio 

U ~WnH?" oI !i. AI E raftl , St ' Lolli ' a - 32,000,000. 
nro eS H ant l etl OMting Laboratory 
/ Apom ' ,' r ou ,' Sliacc Systems Div. 
J '' a Angeles. 

12 Ward LaFrnnee Truck Corn. Elmlm 
Heighta, N V. 51,792,472. Production of 
66 _ aircraft towing traetors. Elmira 
Heights. Warner Robins Air Materiel 
*| ' AF ^ C >' / , Hobi '" AFB. Qa. Matcrlel 



. 

Switlik Parachute Co., Trenton N T si 
OBO 000. Production of cargo A 'pfe 
chutes Trenton. San Antonio Air Ma 
tcrle Area (AFLC), Kelly AFB Tex 

-Curtiss Wright Corp., Wood-Ridge, N J 



$1,020,887. Production of H-34 helicopter 
enElnes. Wood-Ridge. San Antonio Air 
Materiel Area (AFLC), Kelly. AFB, Tex. 
13 University of Illinois, Urbana, 111. J2.000,- 
000. Development of a parallel processing 
computer. Urbann, Rome Air Develop- 
ment Center (AFSG), GrifMss AFB, N. Y. 

(Jcncrnl Dynamics Corp., San Diego, Cnlif. 
81,153,042. Procurement of spare pacts in 
support of the ATLAS/AGENA booHtor 
program. San Diego. Space Systems Div 
(AFSC), Los Anticles. 

Litton Systems Inc., Woodland Ulllii, 
Cnlif. 57,111,630. Production of elec- 
tronic equipment for F-4D and F-4E nlr- 
craft. Salt Lake City, Utnh and Dnlnth, 
Minn. Oklahoma City Air Materiel Arcn 
(AFLC), Tinker AFIJ, Oklu. 

Lockheed Aircraft, Sunnyvale, Calif. S6,- 
606,000. Work on the nKMINI proiri-nra 
target vehicle syntein. Sunnyvale. Spiwo 
Syatems Div. (AFSC), LOH AnReloH. 

BoeinR Co., Wichita, Kan, $1,408,100. 
Investigation of aircraft response to low- 
level critical nil- turbulence. Wlcliiln. 
Systems EnitineerinR Group, Hoscai-nh & 
Technology Div. (AFSG), Wri K ht-l'nlU>r- 
son AFB, Ohio. 

15 Garrett Corp., Torranco, Cnlif. $2,72B,&2G. 
Production of F~<fD aircraft compcmonlH. 
Los Angeles. Oklahoma Gity Air Ma- 
teriel Area (AFLC), Tinker AFII, Okln. 

Sperry Rnntl Corp., Great Nuck, N. Y. $!,- 
320,000. Production of components for 
LORAN nnvlnational equipment, ttrcnt 
Nock. Aeronautical Systems Div. (AFSOI, 
Wrlftht-Patterson AKI}, Ohio. 

General Klcctrlc, West Lynn, Minis. 5 H,- 
008,402. Expansion of eiiRinc productiuii 
fncillties. West Lynn. Aeronautical Syii- 

^W5 ^?' v ' ( AFS ). Wrlht-I>nlU>ni(ni 
AFII, Ohio. 

18 A. J. Industries, Inc., 131 Monte, Cnlff, 
82,104,479. Production of 4GO and OlJO- 
gallon wing fuel tunkn for F-10B nirci-uft. 
, 1 r-^,, nt ^r , Acr nnl-icnl Syntomu Div. 
(AFSC), Wright-Patterson AFII, OliJt., 

19 Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Akron, Oliin 
$1,4B4,BG4. Wheels ami brakes for C-143A 

n, rc '',, t t-, f .4 l(tlon - Aeronautical Sytf!iiiF) 

Div. (AFSC), Wriffht-PntlerHon AFB, Ohio. 

20 ~-Lltton Systcma, Inc., Woodland Ililhi, 

Lalif. S8,5Ba,aii4. AvionlcH BiibHyaloms fur 

, , a '' lcl '" ri . Woodland Hills. Aercnmu- 

eical Systems Div. (AFSC), WrlKht-I'til- 

lerson AFIi, Oliio. 

~1'i C nLu i , C u Eler ;, Inc " C!v " ml HWi. MIoH. 
fei,U07,SlB. Proeiii-emont of aircraft in- 
BtrumontB for C-180 and T-38 airuutft, 
7*i'r! 1 D nv nill ,Vr d 1' , Aeronautic nl SyateniB Div. 
(AFSC). Wright-Patterson AFIJ, Ohli.. 

tl$ A'n A " os ' )nc " Cor|) " Ah ">". <''" 
Sl,du,1,GOO. Protective iirmor for C'-lilll 
aircraft. Akron. Wartier-KobliiH Air Mu- 
torlol Area (AFLC), Itobins AFB, ftl 
nni 8 ? Air " nft ' I'ullorton, Cnlif. $0,7110,- 
uuu. An advanced radar nystum. Fulli-i-- 

iA n i'-f? nlm A lT D wcln]iraiJit Coiilor 
(AI'SC), Grifllss AFIJ, N. Y. 

5?o ll n nn 1Slc trl0 ' J ," hlllto " City. N. V. 
53019,000 . Qun Blfflita for K-4 nlrenifl. 

/ Apqp? u'^' . A "" n ftwenl Syntonw Div, 

(AFSC), WrlBht-Patterson AKI1, Ohio, 
Ann COn J2 f ?; C " Mollra vift, Cnlif. J2,fi()U.- 

AV ,7 72 i c " mel-il sylcms, Monrovia. 

A f' 01 , 1HU i Icnl Systems Div. (AFHC), 

W ,i' lBh t, Pft , U , G1 ' Hon AFB, Ohio. ' '' 

A ! n Mnthicflon Cliemtcnl Corp., ICjim 
Alton in 1,703.8(10. Cnvlridee-^po e . - 
Ene fltnrlers for Ii-62, KO-13B and V -4 
airomfl. Kiit Alton. Aeronautical Hy- 
toma Div, (AFSC), Wrlalit-PattorHon AKll. 

Lockheed Aircraft, Jamaicn N Y Si 
540,000. Modillcation of G il21 alrcrSfL 

^ M ( W mi ? T Ail ' MnlDplol Ami 
Mc Clcllnn, AFB, Calif. 



. 

Prooupomont of solid-nroj.cl- 
m tora tm tho ATHENA nrc- 



AnM afl 
(AFSG), Norton AFB, Calif. 



Bronml 
ground 



r. 

Santa Monica amt 

L ns A ftIi ^ Snaec SystoS 
, Los Angelea. 

' nf Al ?'". Hlckeville, N. Y. 
'"* 11 flndor Beta ' '> : 



May 1966 



ilnr 



Mlnutrmim mildnnco mid control I'liulii- 
moiit. Anuliitlin. Hiilllntt(i Hyfiliiin Dlv. 
(Al-WJ), Norton Al-'H, 01U. 
-IJttim HyntoiHJi, NHW Itoiiiiollo. N. Y. $fl,- 
MJ,7<IR. Himrn iinrtn for n world wliin liluli 
iimvi'i- Kroimil-lo-rili' i-oinmuiili-nlloim iiyn- 
tom Now Horlu'lli'. OUlnlmniii City Air 
Mcili-L'ld Ami (AKI.(I), TliiliiT AKIl. Okln. 
-fii-iiernl Kkrtrlr. I>til1nili<l|ililn, 7.B.flOO. 
Hi'iii'iii'di mill ilnvi'liiimii'iii. " I'" 1 MrH 1'.! 
nvnlrv iiriiKi'iiin, Plillmlclnliln. Hull lull" 
Hyi'li'l'i" Dlv. (Al'W), Norton Al-'ll, ditllf. 
Ci'iirriil Klt'i'lrlr, Wi'iil I.vnn, Munii, $1,- 
11111,01)1). <!<mi|nnii'iil InuH'iivi'iiH'iit iM'iiiirmn 
for .1 - Hfi nin-rnfl. nitttin'ii. Writ I I.ynn, 
Arnitimilli'til Hyitlcmii Dlv, (AI'Wl), 
WvlKliI-ruHt-r ..... i A Kit, ()!ili>. 
Iliu'lntf ('.. Morton, l'. JIH.ti'.'.ll.r.DI). I'm- 
f I'll 47 A lit'lli'ii|il<>i'ii,. Morlfin. 
rnl Hyntomti Htv, (AV'tUl). 
lli'i'iiim A I'M, Oliln, 
li Mftf. <'<!.. I'll ..... ils, Arl 1 .'.. *:!.- 
I'rmliii'Uiiii tif ntt liii'lilni' t>n- 
irr, ..... Til*. Oltlnhonm <Hly Ah- Mit- 
tri-li'l Arm (AKI.n), Tliilu-r AKI1. Olttit. 
Unlti'il AlriTitfl. l'!nt. Miirlfiinl, (toini. 
SI ril(l,!tri'), I'roilnrtloil nf ..... iiiKiiiriilii for 
,| |i'/ unit T :M ulriTitfl cimlnni. Kuril 
lliii'lfnril, Mini Aulonlo Air Mnlr-rlfl An'ii 
(AK!,II). K.-lly AKII. 'IVx, 
AVCO Ciirn., ith'tilf.inl, (lontt. JI,(HH.-tflH, 
AoMlll'iiml iirodiit'H.m i'nol|.iin>nt. nl Air 
Fun 1 .' 1'lntil. -Ill, HI nil f oi'il, AiTiniutitliiiil 
nyntrimii IMv. (AKHH), Wrlitlil-I'iiltiTimii 
AI-'H, Dlil". 

McDminnll Alrcrnfl Cnri>.. III. 1 ..... In. J 1 .!,- 
(I'/l.HHl!. Wov!< mi Ilio (icmlnl iiiuii'i'i-nifl 
tintl nliMil, fur Mio Miiniii'il Orl-ltlriK 
I.ttliomlory. I". I .on hi. Hi>ni l o HynlrniH 
Dlv. (AKiiD), I.i'ii Annot.'ii. 



Navy Sots 
Reliability Policy 

'J'lm Swirotnry f Hits Navy linn rr- 
lonncd n iiollr.y dln-rUvc iiollhiK ftn-lh 
tliti Nnvy'ii rciiulri'iiu'iit.'i In ivKiinl lo 
roUiililllty of Nnviil iiinliu'lut. 

Thn ni'W inntnicLlrm. HKCNAV In- 
n nilOO.Ull, iliih'il Jan. 1!7, HKUt, 
Niivy nntl Mnriim Onrpti iirn- 
iit nlHci'H lo liinu'iinniti' rcllii- 
lilllLy jmivlnltmii, InclndiiiK imiiutHu- 
llvii ri'Miiircnii-ntii in nil niit'i'illcuticnii, 
cxhihiln, lU'iiilncL il<'m<rl|>t!<m, w>vlc 
iitfilcmonl, 1 ! iind t-inilntctutil claimed tu 
IHI rorvr(!<t In or iiu-hulcil in i-unlrucUi 
fin- nyalnniH iunl fUiiHH'laUtd niulcHttl, 

Altiii hiohitlcil in thn nnllcy luitlnit*- 
tion In tlui rt!i|UliTin<-uL Unit. ntn|nv 
cinuthiorntlon In nil mun-cn wlcrllwi 
nctlon bo wlvoii to ctmtrftctov'H rullii- 
bllily cniiiibUILy In both punt purfnrm- 
wnco niul imniont!(l 



Atmosphorlc Test 

Chamber in Operation 

by AF Laboratory 



Conflgurnllon Muntigcmont 

(Continued from Pajje 3) 
cation incompatibilities. At the timo 
of dt)livry from tho breakout con- 
tractor, the config-uration records aro 
iifii'd to deflnis the "as-shipped" con- 



Tim Air Korctt (Jumbrlditn Hu 
liUliornliiHuH liuvo plurtxl in opt-mtion 
tin nnvlroninont Uml chamber ftir B|MI 
ttln)iihrln preiiHiircw mid 
H /oiuul t ulUUidoa up 

to yin.ooo fiMit, 

Tho chnmbor iw bohiK usisl to tHt, 
atljufti, nntl cullbrnto biul(Mn-hrno In- 
HlrumonUi ut vuriouH HlmulnUxl nltl- 
It cttn Himulato RlmonplioHc 
iauren and proMuro* for 
of finy (lunition, Including iit^ 
ric conilitionn ut liiuneh nnd 
Mcont, tit floul ulUtudi'H, nnd dcnoont. 
Dr. WiUUsr Wttmifir of tho Aor- 
npaco IiintrumonUlion I>nborntory do- 
Hlgiuid tho tent facility which woa 
built by Tcmnoy KnRlnwrinff, Inc., of 
Union, N. J. 



Field (JonflKiirniion Record. After 
dulivury of equipment from a I'firfth- 
iniV dontrac.tor'H facility, detailed con- 
linuration definiLion must be main- 
tained throutflumt the equipment 
m'l-vii'.i* life, 'i'his IH particularly im- 
portunt when; HignHkant quantities 
of ('({uipmimt are deployed in such a 
manner Unit mih.stitution and reallo- 
cntidii may take place without 
Hi'1'iinm nyntein perfonnnnee probleniH. 
It bi'oainn apparent early in the 
IVnihinjf program that equiimient 
inuiit lut modified in a nnum^able 
blncK in lieu of iMiinj? \ipdated on an 
individual, piecemeal basin. This was 
acTomplifdu'd through u planned inod- 
ifU-iition program ntili/.iiur contractor 
pi'ruonnel. 

l''or the 1'ei'HhinK Improved I'ro- 
Ki'iimmer '1'eiit Ktntion Program, a 
field riHiflKiiriition record nyntom in 
bi'itiK developed that will accomplish 
the mime HTeet an the production 
nmllfvnrutUm record, except that it 
will compare the an-huilt configura- 
tion lo Held contl(?niti(m. Included 
in thin eompiiriHon will he tho exact 
nfiLl.iKi of the hardware conflffiirntlnn 
and nil outiiLandltiK modlftcnUoiiH 



AS 



that is, those that have been planned 
for incorporation but have not been 
physically installed. The feedback 
system to show installation of modifi- 
cation kits will be accomplished 
utilizing the Army TAKES log sys- 
tem and associated Form 2407. Infor- 
mation will be available showing 
modifications required, modifications 
installed and modifications outstand- 
ing. This information can bo made 
available for individual equipment 
serial numbers, blocks or lots of 
serial numbers, or tho total deployed 
weapon system. 

The configuration accounting tech- 
nunieH described above provide con- 
trol of definition o:C hardware items 
from the initial engineering release 
and throughout production and field 
support of the system. This mech- 
anized control provides greater sim- 
plification and the ability to handle 
extremely largo quantities of data in 
a more timely manner than the 
manual means previously employed. 
Special information to resolve spe- 
cific problems can bo retrieved from 
tho mechanized data file cxpedi- 
tiouHly in lieu of the previous method 
of using a largo amount of manually 
prepared data requiring extensive re- 
search to solve specific problems. 

Full impact of this program has 
not yet been felt; however, wo now 
fed that all Tershing configurations 
in tho field aro defined. 



AS 



ENGINEERED: , ...BUILT 



PT MUMO *WIMU1 



t eiit 

Mlllt' V'lS Mill 

111 I IM ll 6M I 

mi>!>-i> H >> 



UIW) HI Mil 1111 



itiiini ii i ti cam HIM 1 TX .r, -n I 

ks.u'i" u'Mitm.MMi rnwTRAr.T < 

i?I' ll J*Uii ""i "* '^ti " " *-UlN I rXMU I to i -djj 

S;i ^Hi. mi . 'in n - nAor-i IMC , ' " 



BASELINE 




o n > ii * ' 



BREAKOUT 
CONTRACT 




SERIAL NUMBER 

i*' h * ..< . u /-* r- 

HMO'>' HWWK fil- 

IIIHL KOp V 

. M :R,!II (.;., DART INSTALLED 

HB i .oniun -ociini rHFA I IINQ I Ml 1 L_UV 



lifUMII'l 

l! ((> I > B*l II < 



AUTHORIZED 



M"]ll W. ' _ 

tWI 1.:. > DART CHANGE 

KM i t'Oo.oii t'O. "Mn I '-'I IrMHVJL. 

""lii" ' in i trwtri 

.K......:, *}**> LuVuL 

'It I- ID) 



- ..--CHANGES 

11 M -Ull II "1 ' 



Korct-oiNimu' 



PART 
NUMBER 



fal PART NUMBER 
INSTALLED 



; FIGURE 4 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 2O3O1 



POSTAGE AND FEES PAID 



OFFICIAL BUSINESS 




The U.S. Air Force accepted and funded at a cost of $18.5 
million more than one-fourth of the unsolicited proposals it re- 
ceived from the industrial and scientific community during the 
first half of FY 1966. 

Of the 1,189 proposals given consideration, 319 were accepted 
topping the average number accepted during each of the past 
three full years. There has been a steady increase in both accept- 
ances and fundings of unsolicited proposals since FY 1963 when 
only slightly more than seven percent were bought at a cost of $14.3 
million. The number of voluntary proposals submitted has re- 
mained relatively stable each year. Since less average time has 
been spent evaluating unsolicited proposals this year, Air Force 
officials attribute the upswing in acceptance to the merits of the 
current proposals. 

Major General Gerald F. Keeling, Deputy Chief of Staff for Pro- 
curement and Production, Air Force Systems Command, stated 
that unsolicited proposals are encouraged because they often repre- 
sent an unexplored potential of scientific ingenuity and creative 
talent in individuals, universities, non-profit research agencies and 
industrial firms not normally dealing with the Air Force. "Many 
new firms, particularly small ones who would never have an oppor- 
tunity to prove their worth otherwise, are able to establish their 
capabilities and qualifications through unsolicited proposals," said 
General Keeling. "We don't care about the size of a firm; it's 
the competence of its people that interests us. We welcome the 
opportunity to evaluate any ideas they have which might help us 
accomplish our mission of producing qualitatively superior aero- 
space systems. 

fo^ Vnf,?!!t itate Tr he s i-?!f s !? n of uns liei ted proposals, a "Guide 
lfy lu S tary Ul ! so S lted Reposals" has been prepared by the 

I y ST! di The -r de s to where ' when and h w to sub t 

a pioposal. Names, mailing addresses and telephone numbers of 
persons at focal points within Systems Command divi- 
f/ft^ ^ries are listed in the guide, and a 

h i^f teChniCal ^ as and scientific Disciplines 

by each of these persons is included 

A copy of the guide may be obtained from anv Svstems Com- 
mand activity or write to Headquarters, Air Force 

2U331. ttentl n: SCKAE ' Andrews 



Ocecinogrcipliic Study 
Results Published 

The results of a study con- 
cerning- problems encountered in 
the analysis of wave energy 
have been released by the U.S. 
Naval Oceanographic Office in a 
booklet titled, "Wave Himlcast 
Project North Atlantic Ocean 
(TR-183)." 

From the information com- 
piled it is hoped that specific 
predictions of deck motion can 
be applied to aircraft carrier 
landings. The project utilized 
numerical prediction techniques 
on a high-speed electronic com- 
puter. The input consisted of 
raw weather information to 
derive the surface wind direc- 
tion and .speed patterns over the 
ocean. This knowledge was fur- 
ther used as input to a highly 
complex computer program 
which describes wave direction 
and height by time interval be- 
tween successive wave features, 

The Bureau of Naval Weap- 
ons conducted the project with 
the assistance of the Travelers 
Research Center, New York 
University and the Lockheed- 
California Co. 

The compiled results of the 
study, publication number TR- 
183, can be obtained for 76 cents 
from the U.S. Naval Ocean- 
ographic Office, Washington, 
D, C. 20S90. 




ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF 
DEFENSE-PUBLIC AFFAIRS 



IN THIS ISSUE 

Address by Secretary of Dcfenne Uuhorl S. Mi-Nnmaru liefon- 
American Society of Newspaper Editor.s _______________________ 

Ideas and Know-Hoiv Key to Small HiisincjiH SHCCCHB _ 
Military Exports and World Affairs ____________________ 

Navy Authorized Data List A Management Technique .--.'.'.'..' 
The Minutemnn Missile Power for Present and Future 

DEPARTMENTS 

About People ______________________ \ ..... ___ 



Meetings and Symposia ________ 

Speakers Calendar _________ ..... 

Notes for Kditors _____________ 

Calendar of Events 
Defense Procurement ______ 



"The decisive factor few a powerful nation 
the character of HH reliilmnsliip >vilh ih<- 



. ?t 




Hon. Robert fl. McNuniara 






COIlf 

^^^^^7^^^^^ 

fl^ e / rf ,r^tHj/bti 1 mi s ,!r,,',,!r K o7.' rmtci1 in lliiN ' mm r 





Summer Job Program 
Announced by Sec. Def. McNamara 

For the second consecutive year, Secretary ol' Hflensr K< 
S. McNamara has ordered the establishment ol addilmnal : 
jobs in the Defense Department I'or younr; men and women a--, pan 
of the ['resident's Youth Opportunity Campaign. 

In a memorandum to all Military Departments and MOD :Mm 

cies, Secretary McNamara directed lhal the new M icr i"l>-, i.-i 

younj? people' between the aji'es of Hi and :.',!. he establish. -d af n 

ratio of at least one extra trainee for each HIM p|..\ .-in 

rently on the DOT) payroll, The new ioli:;_ will be in addiinm i. 
regular summer employment. Under Ihis I'ormula, ni'i'r.'Min.it.'K 
10,000 new summer jobs would be created in IHH>, 

Theso new job opportunities I'or youlh arc In pn.vid. :uuni' 

fill summer work and traininv; opportunities, Thry nm.v nm:.r.i "i 
any of the positions for which you UK men and women m .ium;u iiv 
are hired dunnc; the summer and such other wnrK ami 
opportunities as can ho made available. 

YoiinjJi' people hired under the program will In- pair! ,-'. I ;'. 
hour, except in those instances when they arc t'mpli'.v.'d tn i 
tions for which a higher waive is approprialc under IV}<M!;H H, 

(ication processes. 

, ,, l( ,,, r , I-.HI..I i iMi. r. w. iiiiiiirnni, w 

In the liHift summer program, more (ban 11, unit yinim: mm \ n . ilt , i ,|,,.. MU> (Yilltii i'n|i 

and women or '10 percent, above the Mill) ralio, wen- u-.t-Tullv s-m... i .i.-m Mr. Kirk l.n i'n] 

employed by 1)01), In his memorandum Sn-ivlary MI'\JMI.U n ' 'l(..u.ii \-. ; .| 1 .i,ini 

Itointed out last summer's highly sncre^iful t .|r. ( ri and add.d. "I N.iM.i.n. I' u,, tlil . JDI. pi 

expect all components of the Deparlincnl of Dcl'i'iisi' In dn n\ I.M.I 

as well this summer," 



National Security Seminars 
Schedule Announced 

The Industrial College of the Armed l-'nnr:. (ICAK) lur, .tn 
nounced the dates and locations I'or Naliuiml Sn-urily rti-inui'n^ 
to lie pi'esented during the academic year l!MiiJ.(iV. Tln-ir \v. v, ,*!. 
sessions are open to resm-ve olllcors of all tlie Mililar.v MI-I VHT .,it*i 
representatives of industry, labor, luiMinciiM, lln* pn.lrv mn M- 
liKion and education. 

Each seminar is based on the in-numlli iv ;i idcnl ,-. n,|,,|, h -i,-,| 

by I(,Als ami consists ol a series of IM ilhislralrd piv ^nhdi..,, ; .0, 

topics and jirobloinH haviiiK a direct heariiiK on nalinnfd : tt -niiiiv. 

Senior (.ilieers from the faculty nf ICAK. repn-.-nliiu. ib,- \nn" 

Navy, Air 1'orce and Marine Corps, will minhiet || lt , .;,,,,(-. ' 

The schedule has been set as follows: 

Sept. 2fi-0ct. 7, l.!)fifl |', u | ()11 ] i(lll , (l , , 

Nov. 7-18. lOfifl lliimirlty AiX ,M,bn, 

Mast Muliiii', |(t.r|( hiiiuni'. 

THM Ifi 07 1IW7 "I., mid UaVfllpMrl, InWii I 

FSii^SS , ^K 11 ^ 1 ' 

March (H 7| 1.907 ,1'iH Calif 

April 17-28, 1007 , Vic if I, i.- ' r!' 

MJIV ifiOft in7 vnvniui I'ails, |i\. 

may D-XO, 1S)(.7 (Jroton, Conn. 



*> )'. l-.U 1 !., llf uf M.'f 




. 
O 



tn 



Any American would bo fortunate 
to visit this lovely island city, in this 
hospitable land. 

But there is a special satisfaction 
for a Secretary of Defense to cross 
the longest border in the world and 
realize that it is also the least armed 
border in the world. It prompts one 
to reflect how negative and narrow a 
notion of defense still clouds our cen- 
tury. 

There is still among us an almost 
eradicable tendency to think of our 
security problem as being exclusively 
a military problem and to think of 
the military problem as being exclu- 
sively a weapon system or hardware 
problem. 

The plain, blunt truth is that con- 
temporary man still conceives of war 
and peace in much the same stereo- 
typed terms that his ancestors did. 
The fact that these ancestors both 
recent iind remote were .conspicu- 
ously unsuccessful at avoiding war, 
and enlarging peace, doesn't seem to 
dampen our capacity for cliches. 

We still tend to conceive of national 
security almost solely as a state of 
armed readiness; a vast, awesome ar- 
senal of weaponry. 

We still tend to assume that it is 
primarily this purely military ingre- 
dient that creates security. 

We are still haunted by this concept 
of military hardware. But how limited 
a concept this actually is, becomes ap- 
parent when one ponders the kind of 
peace that exists between the United 
States and Canada. 

It ia a very cogent example. Here 
we are, two modern nations, highly 
developed technologically, each with 
immense territory, both enriched with 
great reserves of natural resources, 
each militarily sophisticated. Yet, we 
sit across from one- another, divided 
by an unguarded frontier of thou- 
sands of miles, and there is not a re- 
motest set of circumstances, in any 
imaginable time frame of the future, 
in which our two nations would wage 
war on one another. 

It ia so unthinkable an idea as to 
be totally absurd. 

But why is that so? 

Is it because we are both ready in 
an instant to hurl our militai'y hard- 
ware at one another? 



Is it because we are both zeroed 
in on one another's vital targets? 

Is it because we are both armed to 
our technological teeth that we do not 
go to war? 

The whole notion as applied to our 
two countries is ludicrous. 

Canada and the United States are 
at peace for reasons that have nothing 
whatever to do with our mutual mili- 
tary readiness. 

We are at peace truly at peace 
because of the vast fund of compati- 
ble beliefs, common principles and 
shared ideals. 

We have our differences and our 
diversityand let us hope for the sake 
of a mutually rewarding relationship 
we never become sterile carbon cop- 
ies of one another. 

But the whole point is that our ba- 
sis of mutual peace has nothing what- 
ever to do with our military hardware. 

Now this is not to say, obviously 
enough, that the concept of military 
deterrence is no longer relevant in the 
contemporary world. 

Unhappily, it still is critically rele- 
vant with respect to our potential ad- 
versaries. 

But it has no relevance whatever 
between the United States and Can- 
ada. 

We are not adversaries. We are not 
going to become adversaries, And it 
is not mutual military deterrence that 
keeps us from becoming adversaries, 
It is mutual respect for common 
principles. 

Now I mention this as obvious as 
it all is simply as a kind of reductio 
ad absurdum of the concept that mili- 
tary hardware is the exclusive or even 
the primary ingredient of permanent 
peace in the mid-twentieth century. 

In the United States over the past 
five years we have achieved a consid- 
erably improved balance in our total 
military posture. That was the man- 
date I received from Presidents Ken- 
nedy and Johnson; and with their 
support, and that of the Congress, we 
have been able to create a strength- 
ened force structure of land, sea and 
air components with a vast increase 
in mobility and materiel and with a 
massive superiority in nuclear retal- 
iatory power over any combination of 
potential adversaries. 



Our capabilities for nuclear, con- 
ventional and counter-subversive war 
have all been broadened and improved; 
and we have accomplished this through 
military budgets that were in fact les- 
ser percentages of our gross national 
product than in the past. 

From the point of view of combat 
readiness, the United States has never 
been militarily stronger. 

We intend to maintain that readi- 
ness. 

But if we think profoundly about 
the matter, it is clear that this purely 
military posture is not the central ele- 
ment in our security. 

A nation can reach the point at 
which it 'does not buy more security 
for itself simply by buying more mili- 
tary hardware we are at that point. 

The decisive factor for a powerful 
nation already adequately armed 
is the character of its relationships 
with the world. 

In this respect, there are three broad 
groups of nations; first, those that are 
struggling to develop; secondly, those 
free nations that have reached a level 
of strength and prosperity that en- 
ables them to contribute to the peace 
of the world; and, finally, those na- 
tions who might be tempted to make 
themselves our adversaries, 

For each of these groups, the United 
States, to preserve its own intrinsic 
security, has to have distinctive sets 
of relationships, 

First, we have to help protect those 
developing countries which genuinely 
need and request our help, and which 
as an essential pre-condition are 
willing and able to help themselves. 

Second, we have to encourage and 
achieve a more effective partnership 
with those nations who can and should 
share international peace-keeping re- 
sponsibilities. 

Third, we must do all we realisti- 
cally can to reduce the risk of conflict 
with those who might be tempted to 
take up arms against us. 

Let us examine these three sets of 
relationships in detail. 

First, the developing nations. 

Roughly 100 countries today are 
caught up in the difficult transition 
from traditional to modei-n societies. 

There is no uniform rate of prog- 
ress among them, and they range from 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



primitive mosaic HodetieH frac.tural 
by tribalism and hold feebly tonx'ther 
by tin; .slenderest of political sinowH- - 
to relatively sophisticated countries;, 
well on tin; road to agricultural siilli- 
ciuncy and industrial competence. 

This sweep iiifj; HUTR-O of develop- 
nuiiiL, particularly IUTOHH th(! wliolc 
southern half of the e;lobo, him no 
parallel in history. 

H has turned traditionally listless 
areas of this world into scefhinj>' caal- 
drons of change. 

On the wliolc, it has not been a 
very peaceful jirnrcss. 

In the last eiji'hf yearn alone there 
have been no less than MM interim- 
tinnally .'M^nil'ieant outbreaks of vio- 
lence- -each of them fipecilically de- 
signed an a -serious challenjve I.I) the 
authority, or the very existence, of 
tint Kovernmont in question. 

Kitt'liLy-two dill'enmt KovornmonLH 
have been directly' involved. 

What is sl.rikiiiK in that only 15 of 
these Ki'l Hitfidlirmit resorts 'to vio- 
lence liave been military conflicts be- 
tween two slates, 

And not a shiu'le one of the KM 
c.oi>(lid.H IIHH been a formally declared 
war, 

Indeed, there has not been a I'orinal 
declaration of war anywhere in the 
world Cilice World War II, 

Tim plane!, is bceoniini; a danu'eroiui 
place to live on not merely because 
of a potential nuclear holocaust, but 
also because of (he lar^e nuniber of 
f/r ftwtti conflicts and hecaiiiio the 
trend of such conflict!! i; t (t ro\viiin' ni- 
tlier than diniinitiliiiiK. 

At the be^innine; of I'lliH, there 
were !>,'! prolonged imairn'encios (foinjr 
on about the world. An of I'Vh. I, 
:MHi(i, there were 'ID. 

Further, the total number of out., 
breaks of violence has increased nidi 
year; in 1W.H, there were IM ; in miiii 
there wi'i'e BH. 

Hut what is most significant of all 
is that there is a direct and constant 
relationship between the Incidence of 
violence and the economic status of 
till! countries alllicted. 

The World Hanlc divides nations, on 
UIK basin of p ( . r capita income, into 
four catcKorie.'c rich, niiddle-ineome 
poor, and very poor, 

The rich nations are thorn- with a 
per capita income of $750 p H . yi , !ir 
in- more. The current U.S. level i>t 
'"lore than $2,700. There are :\'l ,,'f 
thc.Hi! rich nutiiiim. They possess 7fi 
porw'iit of the world's wealth, Uimirh 
ninthly only ar> percent of the world's 
population. 

i Kince, IWiH, only om , ,,f $ wm a? na .. 
InniH has milferHd a nuijor Internal 
uphoavnl mi its own territory, 

Hut observe what happen* at the 
ollior uiul of tlu! economic cale. 



oiiiv l.be HH very poor 1111(1011;; 
Hi! with a ]K'r ca]iil/t iarunie of nil- 
did' $100 a year -no le:;i; Hum III! Inivi- 
KiiflVri'd sit'.'nilicaiit mnllicl;i. Indi-cd, 
they have .still'ered an average "'' l.\vu 
major mitbrealis of vinlenci' per mini 
try in Ilir I'ij'lif -year period. That i:; 
a ,.1'reat deal uf coiillicl. 

Wlmt i; 1 win 1 !!!*, if linn been, pn- 
dominiinl l,\'i eon (lie I. uf a pnilonrrd 



The trend holds predictably constant 
in the case nf the two other raleo.nr 
ieii: the poor, and (hi 1 middle incnme 
nations, Since I%H, KV percenl nf the 
very |iuor nations, (1!) pcrccnl. nf I be 
)ioor nations, and -IH percent nf (be 
middle- income nalimis luivt< :n life red 
,'ioi'ioiiii vinleiice. 

There can, then, be no n,ueslinn but 
that there is an irrefutable relalion- 

Khiji lu> I ween violence and economic 
Iwi'lnvnrdiicHN. And Hie (rend nf /.ucli 
violence is up, nnl ihiwn. 

Now, il wnllid perhaps be Sninr 
what. I'l'imsurinc; if the j'ap between 
the rich nalinas and the poor nntinns 
were closinK; and cconnmic backward 
ness were tiin'iiilicanlly recediii) 1 , 1 , 

Dill, il is not. The ecnnimiie (-/up \ : . 
widening, 

Hy Ihe yt'ar lii'/O, over nne half nf 
Ihe world's lolnl ]inpulalion will liv.> 
in Ihe indepi'iidenl mil inns sweeping 
ncnin.'i Hie snulbern half nf Hie pluni'l. 
Hut Ihiii )nine;erinK half nf lb Ini 
man race will by Ihen conunaml only 
one-;iixlh of (he world's lulu] nf j-uod-i 
and services, 

Hy Ihe year lii'/li, Ihe dependent 
children nf these nations u!nm< ehil 
drcii under 10 years nf nne will 
email (he Inlal linpnlalion of Ihe de 
velopcd nalinns (o Hie imrlh, 

Kven in mir own abundant iiocictier., 
we have reasmi enoiij;b |u w.irry nvrr 
Hie li'iuiinns (hat cnil and Hirhli-n 
amour; underprivileged yniinir pei.ple, 
and Dually Hail mil. in de]|ni|iienrv Mini 
ei'ime, \Vhat aie WM In expect from 
a whole homripliere nf yniilh where 
nimmliiijr fnislralloiiii arc llltrly In 
fester infn orupl mint nf violence nml 



Annual porcapila income in rnujrlily 
hull' of Ihe HO nndi<i'develo|icd imtiuim 
lhal arc inemberii nf (he World hank 
is riniii)'. 1 by a piiHiy mn< prn-i-nt it 

year or less. Hy It id nf t|,,. ,.,-11- 

lury, Ihcsi- nalinnn al their pin. ml 
raleii nf j^niwth will reach a p,'i ,.,,. 
ila iacoini- of Imi'i-ly $IVO a your. Tin- 
1'nil.cd Slates, by l,lie toinie criteria, 
will attain a per nipila inrnnic of SI . 

r.ini. 

The conclusion of all tlllti in hlunl 
inl inciicnpable; ftiven tin- certain 
nmiicctioii between ecnnnniic nlurim. 
lion ami Ihe incidence of violence, Ihe 
yearn (bat lie ahead for tin- imfin<i 
in (he Hi.utheni hulf nf | In- };lobi< me 
with violence, 



Hull] MIL, row and IVKinj; however 
harsh I bei r inli-i mil dillVreriivs n.. 
can! ihe whole mndei ni/al inn process 
a:i an ideal envirunmml. fnr the 
I'.niwtb nf eninniuniiiin, Tlieii 1 ex|.eri- 
t'lu'e \vilb Milivrrsivi 1 inli'rnal war IN 
esh'iisivf ami tln-y hm r c de\'eln|u>d a 
nmsiderahir array <>| bn||| doctrine 
ami pi acliral ine;t!mivs in I In; ait of 
pnlil icitl violence, 

\\'liat i'. nl It'll liilMlnilrl ;i|nnd i:; | |m( 
>l i are i'ii|i:ible uf 'inbverliai; 
pnl at ill)', ami, linally, iliii'rlinjt 
fur Ilieir own eml.'t Die \vboUy leinlj- 
male j r i ' r \ Miiee,", of n di'Velopiitjf 

'" i ee.in d nnnniiinism n;i 
Ihe etnlnd hn'lm in evriv cnnftii-l. 
llirmij'.liont (In uinb'id.^'.'lnped wni'lil. 
"I Hn- M'.i MM JMU:! inh-i nnl in;nirKeii. 
cii':' in tin- pli'it ricttl yi'lUS, enmnill" 
ni.'.l'i liavi- bt-rii invnh-rd in i.nly M 
of llti'ln :i!i pel, , -Ml ,,f Hi,' Inlnl ' Illlll 
linn iiirhld. 1 ". in-Vt'ii iii'il tiixv;! in \vhlcli 
a .'.tminniir>l regime it-n-lf was I hi' 
liit'i:. 1 ! .'1 111. 1 ii|n i;:ini' 

\\ liclhi'l 1 .'i. in inn hi il , ui e involvril 
n| lint, vinb'lt.e iinyullele in a laill 
\vm Id t ni ii. iiiil'i ;i|nu |< :iiirnal:i lhroii|di 
I In- rnitiplfs, Kiini'lia ..I inieriiallnnal 
ii'lulinir'i nml I In- MTinily nf (hi 1 

Unileil Mttilivi | Inf.'il li (he ricciil'- 

tfy ami ".hilntil v >.f nul juns ball' n 




(.'nil-- tbi' i-opMiniy, I-H Jiri li'inv rnti" 
Hi in -i \vbiil Ii Hiii. in n a l HI i- iMici'iviht; 
Ibat in iiin-ti in'jjince- ( ,i' int<<ma1 vl.i- 
lenci- ||n- b.(',il |ieiip|r lliein::i'|ve;i arc 
be:,t old.' I.. ( |,.,,1 ilii.-clly wllb the 

'H I HO I l"l| I', il iiin |},;- ( | nHU'Wi'l'li (if 
Hlrll' HU || I I Hilll toll :, 

The Ihtiii'il Sii.-:. |,(i;i no mnmlatc 

finin on hii'll lo p. .[|i < r (he woihl, itllll 
MM llil-lnialliill i.i llo ;,.., Then. ImVC 
been eltertli' rii;.e;t in \UHeh mir deli- 
hei'iite IIMII ael i>'li v, uti I In- WJM'ji! ac- 
tion nf nil. 

When- niir Iii-lj. in in, | fiMiij^hl, it In 
neltlinn pindent l-i vi'tiniti-t-r, 

I 'el luillly U<- iiiivr H" e|iiU le|' to |'c!!- 
rili' lbi|indi-| IM|r lr);j|ner;. V.'llo ||(|VC 
bt'iiHi;ti( vm]i-n. i- mi tl).-|ii".e|ve!i by ili' 

mule rvpi-i'lalif-n-- nf llicil' ( it iiieiiry. 

l-'lll'lhi'l', UlI'nllKlloiil, the nt-Kl tli'C- 
ade advaiieinir ferltin.ln^y will reilnce 
ttie ii'ipiirenieiil for ('ii-.i/ ;J and nl/inlnK 
iil'lil:i ul pai tiriilur Im u|.itr< tibroad, 
ami Hie wbo| t . pallern ..f forward dc- 
pb.ym.-nl will t;(adi)ully ehaiiKt 1 , 

Hut lb"ii(:li all tin caveiits arc 
dear enoiijrh |)H< jj re.hi. il.li- fad re- 

Juno 1966 



mains that our security is related di- 
rectly to the security of the newly 
developing world. 

And our role must bo precisely this: 
to help provide security to those de- 
veloping nations which genuinely need 
and request our help, and which dem- 
onstrably are willing and able to help 
themselves. 

The rub comes in this: we do not 
always grasp the meaning of the word 
security in this context. 

In a modernizing society security 
means development. 

Security is not military hardware, 
though it may include it. Security is 
not military force, though it may in- 
volve it. Security is not traditional 
military activity, though it may en- 
compass it. 

Security is development. 

Without development, there can be 
no security. 

A developing nation that docs not 
in fact develop simply cannot remain 
"secure." 

It cannot remain secure for the in- 
tractable reason that its own citizenry 
cannot shed its human nature. 

If security implies anything, it im- 
plies a minimal measure of order and 
stability. 

Without internal development of at 
least a minimal degree, order and 
stability are simply not possible. They 
are not possible because human na- 
ture cannot be frustrated beyond in- 
trinsic limits. It reacts because it 
must. 

Now, that is what we do not al- 
ways understand; and that is also 
what governments of modernizing na- 
tions do not always understand. 

But by emphasizing that security 
arises from development, I do not say 
that an underdeveloped nation cannot 
be subverted from within, or be ag- 
gressed upon from without, or he the 
victim of a combination of the two. 

It can. And to prevent any or all 
of these conditions, a nation docs re- 
quire appropriate military capabili- 
ties to deal with the specific problem. 
But the specific military problem is 
only a narrow facet of the broader se- 
curity problem. 

Military force can help provide law 
and order, but only to the degree that 
a basis for law and order already ex- 
ists in the developing society a basic 
willingness on the part of the people 
to cooperate. 

The law and order is a shield, be- 
hind which the central fact of secur- 
ity development can be achieved. 

Now we are not playing a semantic 
game with these words. 

The trouble is that we have been 
lost in a semantic jungle for too long. 
We have come to identify "security" 
with exclusively military phenomena, 



and most particularly with military 
hardware. 

Hut it just isn't so. And we need to 
accommodate to the facts of the mat- 
ter if we want to see security survive 
and grow in the southern half of the 
globe. 

Development means economic, social 
and political progress. It means a rea- 
sonable standard of living and the 
word "reasonable" in this context re- 
quires continual redefinition. What is 
reasonable in an earlier stage of de- 
velopment will become unreasonable 
in a later stage. 

As development progresses, security 
progresses; and when the people of a 
nation have organized their own hu- 
man and natural resources to provide 
themselves with what they need and 
expect out of life, and have learned 
to compromise peacefully among com- 
peting demands in the larger national 
interest, then their resistance to dis- 
order and violence will be enormously 
increased. 

Conversely, the tragic need of des- 
perate men to rusort to force to a- 
chievo the inner imperatives of human 
decency will diminish. 

Now, I have said that the role of 
the United States is to help provide 
security to those modernizing nations, 
providing they need and request our 
help and arc clearly willing and able 
to help themselves. 

But what should our help be? 

Clearly, it should he help towards 
development. In the military sphere, 
that involves two broad categories of 
assistance. 

We should help the developing na- 
tion with such training and equipment 
as is necessary to maintain the pro- 
tective shield behind which develop- 
ment can go forward. 

The dimensions of that shield vary 
from country to country; but what is 
essential is that it should be a shield 
and not a capacity for external ag- 
gression. 

The second and perhaps less un- 
derstood category of military assist- 
ance in a modernizing nation is 
training; in civic action. 

Civic action is another one of those 
semantic puzzles. Too few Americans 
and too few officials in developing 
nations really comprehend what mili- 
tary civic action means, 

Essentially, it means using indigen- 
ous military forces for non-traditional 
military projects projects that are 
useful to the local population in fields 
such as education, public works, 
health, sanitation, agriculture in- 
deed, anything connected with eco- 
nomic or social progress. 

It has had some impressive results. 
In the past four years, the U.S.- 
assisted civic action program, world- 
wide, has constructed or repaired 



more than 10,000 miles of roads; built 
over 1,000 schools:, hundreds of hos- 
pitals and clinics; and has provided 
medical and dental care to approxi- 
mately four million people. 

What is important is that all this 
was done by indigenous men in uni- 
form. Quite apart from the develop- 
mental projects themselves, the pro- 
gram powerfully alters the negative 
image of the military man as the op- 
pressive preserver of the stagnant 
status quo. 

But assistance in the purely mili- 
tary sphere is not enough. Economic 
assistance is also essential. The Presi- 
dent is determined that our aid should 
be hard headed and rigorously realis- 
tic: that it should deal directly with 
the roots of under-developmentj and 
not merely attempt to alleviate the 
symptoms. His bedrock principle is 
that U.S. economic aid no matter 
what' its magnitude is futile unless 
the country in question is resolute in 
making the primary effort itself. That 
will be the criterion, and that will be 
the crucial condition for all our future 
assistance. 

Only the developing nations them- 
selves can take the fundamental meas- 
ures that make outside assistance 
meaningful. These measures are often 
unpalatable and frequently call Cor 
political courage ami decisiveness. But 
to fail to undertake painful, but essen- 
tial reform inevitably leads to far 
more painful revolutionary violence. 
Our economic assistance is designed to 
ofl'er a reasonable alternative to that 
violence. It is designed to help substi- 
tute peaceful progress for tragic. in- 
ternal conflict. 

The United States intends to bo 
compassionate and generous in this 
effort, hut it is not an effort it cnn 
carry exclusively by itself. And, thus, 
it looks to those nations who have 
reached the point of self-sustaining 
prosperity to increase their contribu- 
tion to the development and, thus, 
to the security of the modernizing 
world. 

And that brings me to the second 
set of; relationships that I under- 
scored at the outset; it is the policy of 
the United States to encourage and 
achieve a more effective partnership 
with those nations who can, and 
should, share international peace- 
keeping responsibilities. 

America has devoted a higher pro- 
portion of its gross national product 
to its military establishment than any 
other major free world nation. This 
was even true before our increased 
expenditures in Southeast Asia. 

We have had, over the last few 
years, as many men in uniform as all 
the nations of Western Europe com- 
bined, even though they have a pop- 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



illation half again greater than our 



Now, the American people are not 
going to shirk their obligations in any 
part of the world, hut they clearly 
cannot he expected to hear a dispro- 
portionate share of the common bur- 
den indefinitely. 

If, for example, other nations gen- 
uinely believe as they say they do 
that it is in the common interest to 
deter the expansion of Red China's 
economic and political control beyond 
its natural boundaries, then they must 
take a more active role in guarding 
the defense perimeter. 

Let me be perfectly clear: this is 
not to question the policy of neutral- 
ism or non-alignment of any partic- 
ular nation. But it is to emphasize 
that the independence of 3uch nations 
can in the end be fully safeguarded 
only by collective agreements among 
themselves and their neighbors. 

The plain truth is the clay is com- 
ing when no single nation, however 
powerful, can undertake by itself to 
keep the peace outside its own bor- 
ders. Regional and international or- 
ganizations for peace-keeping pur- 
poses are as yet rudimentary; but 
they must grow in experience and be 
strengthened by deliberate and prac^ 
tical cooperative action. 

In this matter, the example of Can- 
ada is a model for nations every- 
where. As Prime Minister Pearson 
pointed out eloquently in New York 
just last week: Canada "is as deeply 
involved in the world's affairs as any 
country of its size. We accept this 
because we have learned over 60 years 
that isolation from the policies that 
determine war does not give us im- 
munity from the bloody, sacrificial 
consequences of their failure. We 
learned that in 1914 and again in 
1939. That is why we have been proud 
to send our men to take part in every 
peace-keeping operation of the United 
Nations in Korea, and Kashmir, and 
the Suez, and the Congo, and Cyprus." 

The Organization of the American 
States in the Dominican Republic, the 
more than 30 nations contributing 
troops or supplies to assist the gov- 
ernment of South Vietnam, indeed 
even the parallel efforts of the United 
States and the Soviet Union in; the 
Pakistan-India conflict these sffo/ts, 
together with those of- the United; Na- 
tions, are the first attempts to substi- 
tute multinational for unilateral 
policing of violence. They point to the 
peace-keeping patterns of the future. 

We must not merely applaud the 
idea. We must dedicate talent, re- 
sources and hard practical thinking 
to its implementation, 

In Western Europe an area whose 
burgeoning economic vitality stands 
as a monument to the wisdom of the 



Marshall Plan the problems of se- 
curity are neither static nor wholly 
new. Fundamental changes arc under 
way, though certain inescapable real- 
ities remain. 

The conventional forces of NATO, 
for example, still require a nuclear 
backdrop beyond the capability of any 
Western European nation to supply, 
and the United States is fully com- 
mitted to provide that major nuclear 
deterrent. 

However, the European members of 
the alliance have a natural desire to 
participate more actively in nuclear 
planning. A central task of the alli- 
ance today is, therefore, to work out 
the relationships and institutions 
through which shared nuclear plan- 
ning can be effective. We have made- 
a practical and promising start in the 
Special Committee of NATO Defense 
Ministers. 

Common planning and consultation 
are essential aspects of any sensibly 
substitute to the unworkable and dan- 
gerous alternative of independent 
national nuclear forces within the 
alliance. 

And even beyond the alliance, we 
must find the means to prevent the 
proliferation of nuclear weapons. That 
is a clear imperative. 

There arc, of course, risks in non- 
proliferation arrangements, but they 
cannot be compared with the infinitely 
greater risks that would arise out of 
the increase in national nuclear stock- 
piles. 

In the calculus of risk, to prolifer- 
ate independent national nuclear 
forces is not a mere arithmetical ad- 
dition of danger. We would not be 
merely adding up risks. We would be 
insanely multiplying them. 

If we seriously intend to pass on a 
world to our children that is not 
threatened by nuclear holocaust, we 
must come to grips with the problem 
of proliferation. 

A reasonable nonproliferation agree- 
ment is feasible. For there is no ad- 
versary with whom we do not share 11 
common interest in avoiding mutual 
destruction triggered by an irrespon- 
sible nth power. 

That brings me to the third and 
last set of relationships the United 
States must deal with; those with na- 
tions who might be tempted to take 
up arms against us. 

These relationships call for realism. 
But realism is not a hardened, inflex- 
ible, unimaginative attitude. The real- 
istic mind is a restlessly creative mind 
free of naive delusions, but full of 
practical alternatives. 

There are practical alternatives to 
our current relationships with both 
the Soviet Union and ' Communist 
China. 

A vast ideological chasm separates 



us from them and to a degree, sep- 
arates them from one another. 

There is nothing to be gained from 
our seeking an ideological rapproche- 
ment; but breaching the isolation of 
great nations like lied China, even 
when that isolation is largely of its 
own making, reduces the danger of 
potential catastrophic misunderstand- 
ings, and increases the incentive on 
both sides to resolve disputes by rea- 
son other than force. 

There are many ways in which wo 
can build bridges toward nations who 
would cut themselves oft' from the 
meaningful contact with us. We can 
do so with properly balanced trade 
relations, diplomatic contacts and, in 
some cases, even by exchanges of mili- 
tary observers. 

We have to know where it is we 
want to place this bridge, what sort 
of traffic we want to travel over it, 
and on what mutual foundations the 
whole structure can be designed. 

There are no one-cliff bridges. If 
you arc going to span a chasm, you 
have to rest the structure on both 
cliffs. 

Now cliffs, generally speaking, are 
rather hazardous places. Some people 
are afraid even to look over the edge. 
But in a thermonuclear world, we can- 
not afford any political acrophobia. 

President Johnson has put the mat- 
ter squarely. By building bridges to 
those who make themselves our adver- 
saries "we can help gradually to create 
a community of interest, a community 
of effort." 

With respect to a "community of 
effort," let mo suggest a concrete pro- 
posal for our own present young gen- 
eration in the United States. 

It is a committed and dedicated 
generation. It has proven that in its 
enormously impressive pcrEormiinca 
in the Peace Corps overseas; and in 
its willingness to volunteer for a final 
assault on such poverty nnd lack of 
opportunity that still remain in our 
own country. 

As matters stand, our present Se- 
lective Service System draws on only 
a minority of eligible young men. 

That is an inequity. 

It seems to mo that we could move; 
toward remedying that inequity by 
asking every young person in the 
United States to give two years of 
service to his country whether in one 
of the Military Services, in the Pence 
Corps, or in some other volunteer de- 
velopmental work at homo or abroad. 

We could encourage other countries 
to do the same; and wo could work out 
exchange programs much ns the Peace 
Corps is already planning to do, 

While this is not an altogether new 
suggestion, it has been criticized na 

(Continued on Page J(2) 



June 1966 



A familiar cliche that has been 
kicking around the business world 
for too many years Holds that only 
large companies are capable of com- 
peting successfully for Department of 
Defense contracts. Until recently, the 
feeling was that only a huge concern 
with a lot of sophisticated equipment 
backed up by years of experience 
could satisfy the needs of the mili- 
tary, particularly in the area of new 
systems and weapons. 

However, the idea that small com- 
panies don't stand a chance against 
larger corporations is becoming more 
obsolete every year. Some of the larg- 
est DOD contractors today began not 
long ago as small business suppliers. 
Such well known corporations as Lit- 
ton Industries, Sanders Associates 
and Teledyne all started as small 
concerns and expanded because of 
their competent work on DOD proj- 
ects. 

A small company with a good idea 
and a lot of technical knowledge al- 
ways has a good chance of competing 
in the same league as the "big boys." 
This is possible because DOD rec- 
ognizes that creative thinking based 
on sound technical background is 
valuable whether it originates in large 
or small organizations. 

An example of a small company 
success is the case history of the 
Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. of 
Asheville, N.C. 

The ability of this company's man- 
agers to understand and provide 
hardware solutions for specific mili- 
tary problems has been the driving 
force responsible for the organiza- 
tion's growth from a three-man op- 
eration in 1958 into a corporation 
that grossed nearly a million dollars 
last year. 

The founder of this remarkable 
company is Fred B. Stencel, a native 
of Yugoslavia born in 1900, After 
acquiring an impressive technical 
background abroad, including post- 
graduate work in aero-elasticity, 
aerodynamics and hydrodynamics, 
Stencel came to the United States in 
1916 and went to work for the U.S. 
Army. 

A few years later, after serving 
for a short time with a private arms 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



industry, Stencel decided to branch 
out on his own and develop an idea 
which had come to him during his 
experience in working with para- 
chute development for the Army. 

One of his accomplishments while 
working with the Oerlikon Tool and 
Arms Corp. was the invention of the 
first practicable and repeatable para- 
chute capable of functioning in a 
wide range of aerodynamic conditions. 
This concept became the cornerstone 
of what was later to be his own 
company. 

Setting up shop in an abandoned 
barn near Ashevillo, N.C., Stencel 
and two comrades began to develop 
the idea. The trio's first success came 
when the Air Force awarded them a 
contract for further development of 
ballistically deployed and ballistically 
spread parachutes to provide escape 
from slow-moving planes operating at 
low altitudes. 

After successfully completing this 
assignment, the company was picked 
to 'develop a 100-foot diameter para- 
chute which would provide a safety 
system for high- altitude manned bal- 
loons. Stencel's growing company was 
contracted to design and deliver a re- 
covery system for the U.S. Navy's 
Strato-Lab Project in eight weeks. 
Stencel and his assistants met the 
deadline ami produced a parachute 
system which would achieve full re- 
covery within a drop distance of 100 
feet compared to 1,000 to 1,500 feet 
which was the limit of conventional 
parachutes at that time. 

Much of the work done on the 
Navy project, including construction 
of two 100-foot testing towers, was 
done under extremely adverse condi- 
tions resulting from the aftermath of 
a disastroiis hurricane that had 
lashed Asheville a few days earlier. 

This tenacity to succeed in assign- 
ments was recognized and led to 
other small Government prime and 
sub-contracts which aided in the 
growth of the young company. 

In 1960, the Navy's Bureau of 
Weapons awarded Stencel Aero En- 
gineering Corp. a contract to develop 
a ballistic parachute system for use 
with ejection seats and, in 1961, after 
heavy competition, the company was 



chosen to develop a new concept for 
emergency escape and survival from 
aircraft. 

The result of all this labor was the 
MODULAR system (Modular Re- 
straint, Recovery and Survival Sys- 
tem) which combined the various sep- 
arate escape system components 
already developed thus increasing 
overall escape and survival capabili- 
ties, 

This work led to Stencel's interest 
in other escape system problems. One 
question which had been bothering 
aircraft engineers was how to deal 
with the angular momentum of the 
man-seat combination of the ejection 
escape system which occurred be- 
cause the center of gravity varies 
from man to man. 

Working on this problem on his 
own time and using his own funds, 
Stencel came up with the answer. 
The result was the DART system, a 
major contribution in aei-ospaee en- 
gineering now universally recognized 
as a requii'ement for rocket escape 
systems. 

The company is now busy on an 
escape system called MODPAC. 
This system will combine the de- 
velopment work done on the ballis- 
tic parachute, the MODULAR system 
and the DART system. Stencel ex- 
pects that the system will be ready 
for production and installation into 
military aircraft by June this year. 

A gauge of the company's phenom- 
enal growth, which has been based 
completely on DOD prime and sub- 
contracts, can be seen in a compari- 
son of the net sales which, in 1969, 
totaled $79,667 and in 1965 were just 
short of a million dollars, 

One of the main i-easons for the 
success of the Stencel Aero Engineer- 
ing Corp. is the company's ability to 
devise simple and practical hardware 
solutions to complex problems and the 
ability to bring together in one organi- 
zation creative people with diverse 
technical backgrounds and form these 
people into an efficient team which haa 
maintained a continued high standard 
of performance. 

(Continued on Page 12) 



by 

Henry J, Knss, Jr. 

Dei). Asst. Secretary of Defense 

(International Logistics Negotiations) 



Many in the industrial community 
must already be aware of the linkage 
between military exports and world 
affairs. In this article I would like 
to cover this relationship in three 
ways : 

To identify this linkage in quan- 
titative or proportional terms. 

To describe the military-politi- 
cal-economic linkage to these exports 
in some of the significant negotiations 
of the recent past. 

Finally in greater detail, to ex- 
amine some of the world forces that 
are set in movement by this export 
program as they apply specifically to 
Europe and as they are manifested 
in the United Kingdom's considera- 
tion of its own industry. 

First, let us take a brief look at 
the scope of military exports in re- 
cent years and the potential for the 
next few years. In FY 1965 military 
export orders rose to $1.82 billion 
for the highest amount since the be- 
ginning of the program in the 1961- 
1962 period. This represented a 600 
percent increase over the annual ex- 
perience most representative of the 
1950's. 

Over $7 billion in potential has 
been identified for the period 1966- 
1968 or an overage of almost $2.5 
billion per year. 

We expect military export orders 
to continue at a minimum of $1 to 
$1.5 billion a year as long 'as it is 
necessary for the free world to main- 
tain adeouato rfofoneA 



ployment, spread through all 50 states 
and the District of Columbia, will re- 
sult from this effort. 

Almost $1 billion in additional 
profits will accrue to U. S. industry. 

Case receipts amounted to almost 
$5 billion for the last five years, 

Linkage in Quantitative or 
Proportional Terms. 

Turning now to the relationship 
of military exports and world affairs 
in quantitative or proportional terms, 
let me 'ask you to ponder the ano- 
malies inherent in these questions: 

Are you aware that while mili- 
tary exports constitute less than five 
percent of the total defense business 
in the United States, they constitute 
a much more significant proportion 
of the balance of the free world's 'de- 
fense business, running 15 to 25 per- 
cent average and sometimes 50 to 75 
pei-cent of individual area or country 
defense expenditures? 



* Are you aware that, while mili- 
tary exports constitute less than four 
percent of our annual expenditures 
to develop U. S. forces, they account 
for almost half of the deployment 
costs of those forces as measured 
against our balance of payments? 

Are you aware that, while we 
have sold to about GO nations in the 
recent past, less than 10 of those 
nations account for almost 90 percent 
of the sales? 

Let's take a look at these throi* 
quantitative expressions and see Iinw 
they affect world . affairs. Starting 
with the last one 10 of the nations 
account for 90 percent of the sales 
what this really means is that out' 
major sales arc to those countries 
who have the largest and most muly 
forces who make up the bulk of allied 
military readiness. In order of their 
significance in the sales program, 
they are: 

German forces, who have bought 
over $3 billion from UK in the last 
four years and who will in time of 
war actually make up, together with 
our five divisions in Europe, one of 
the major field armios defending 
NATO. 

The United Kingdom which, witli 
the signing of the F-lll pro- 
gram, is expected to spend over i$2 
billion in the United States for mili- 
tary amis in future years and which 
constitutes the principal European 



PAST e 

FYI96I 



P01WIAU 
-FYI97I 




i - 



1970 



June 1966 



nation maintaining, with the United 
States, world-wide responsibility for 
the maintenance of peace from Ger- 
many to the Atlantic Ocean to Libya 
to the Indian Ocean to Malaysia. 

Australia, a nation coming alive 
to the problem of preparedness in 
Southeast Asia and the need to pro- 
vide for its defense, a nation which 
has or will purchase $.53 billion of 
military products from the United 
States, 

Italy, Canada, Belgium and other 
NATO nations which constitute a 
major link in our world-wide forward 
strategy, buying almost another bil- 
lion dollars of products to strengthen 
their defenses. 

Japan, awakening to its self- 
defense responsibilities, in the context 
of a growing national product, is 
closely aligned with the free world. 

Let's look at the facts brought out 
by the second question: while mili- 
tary exports are four percent of our 
total annual defense budget, they ac- 
count for more than half of the de- 
ployment costs of our forces, meas- 
ured in balance of payments terms. 
Here we are not talking about allied 
strength, but are talking about our 
ability to project our strength around 
the world. The ability of this coun- 
try to follow a forward strategy is 
heavily influenced by the balance of 
payments coats attributable to such 
a strategy. If we were unable to 
maintain adequate military deploy- 
ment, we might be unable to seixe 
political opportunities, or we might 
not be able to follow a strategy of 
defending the United States at the 
frontiers of the non-communist world, 
or we might have to seek these objec- 
tives with higher risks. The receipts 
from military exports are of interest 
to the nation because of their major 
contribution to offsetting the foreign 
exchange deployment costs of our 
strategy. 

Turning to the first point while 
military exports constitute less than 
five percent of the total funds spent 
for the acquisition and development 
of military production in the United 
States, they constitute 15 to 25 per- 
cent average and sometimes GO to 75 
percent of individual country defense 
expenditures. No other figure magni- 
fies the relationship of military ex- 
ports to world affairs as compared 
with domestic affairs. While a sale 
may constitute three percent or less 
of our total or an individual com- 



pany's business, it is almost always 
25 percent or more of the foreign 
country's defense program. This 
means that, while the military export 
transaction may be very peripheral 
to a company's business life, it is de- 
cidedly anything but peripheral at 
the other end of the pipeline. Some- 
times this difference in perspective 
between the supplier and the cus- 
tomer leads to complications contrary 
to our national interests. 

Thus, you can see that the impact 
of our military exports, although 
largo in itself for domestic considera- 
tion, is multiplied manyfold when 
viewed from a world affairs point of 
view: 

From considerations of military 
strength of countries allied to us. 

From the point of view of our 
own economic health in the world 
and ability to deploy for a forward 
strategy. 

From the point of view of the 
impact on the customer country's po- 
litical and economic environments. 

Military-Poll tical-Economic 
Linkage. 

1 should like to turn now to a non- 
quantitative look at some of o\ir 
principal military export areas of ef- 
fort and sec how these relate to 
world affairs. 

First, as I have already mentioned 
with respect to Germany, our pro- 
gram is part of a very carefully 
worked out set o;f international activ- 
ities between the Gorman Armed 
Forces and the American Armed 
Forces. These activities are of benefit 
to the equipment, logistics and train- 
ing readiness of the German Armed 
Forces, as well as being of benefit to 
both nations in making it econom- 
ically feasible for the United States 
to deploy a large force in the for- 
ward area. It is a program that man- 
ifests itself in carefully planned 
meetings of military and civilian 
staffs at all levels of government 
integrated lines of logistics commu- 
nication integrated linos of voice and 
digital communications throughout 
our entire depot supply system co- 
operation in research and develop- 
ment joint use of training facilities 
and depots wherever possible joint 
development of weapons like the 
Main Battle Tank of 1970 and even 
the gripping problems like metric 
versus inch system, 

In the United Kingdom, contrary 
to popular belief, the military export 



program never was a sales program. 
It was a program worked out in di- 
rect response to the United King- 
dom's needs to put forth a defense 
establishment within an economic 
belt tightening program. The three 
recent aircraft programs were part 
of an action to save well over $1 bil- 
lion in the British "defense budget. 
Without this action the British 
Armed Forces would have been consid- 
erably more restricted in manifesting 
a British defense responsibility 
throughout the world. This was a 
program that represented our na- 
tional interest in world affairs as 
well. Its solution in the context of 
international politics required the 
closest association between govern- 
ment and industry action. The action 
of McDonnell, General Dynamics and 
Lockheed working with the U, S. 
Government on this program of in- 
ternational cooperation has been ex- 
cellent. 

In Australia our military export 
program was first a manifestation 
of close U. S.-Australian military- 
to-military interests. Secondly, it was 
a result of the growing Australian 
recognition of the severity of the 
Southeast Asian problem and, 
thirdly, a cooperation in the broadest 
field of international finance before 
it ever became a sales program. 

Our program in Canada was and 
is a demonstration of the reciprocity 
required between two nations whose 
economies are so closely linked. 
Without such recognition the Cana- 
dian Armed Forces could not gain 
the benefits of the Canadian- Ameri- 
can defense common market, 

Our programs in India and Iran 
were negotiated in such a way that 
they were as much a recognition of 
the need for m il i tary strength 
against the communist bloc as they 
were a recognition of the need to 
maintain the expenditure of re- 
sources on military activity within 
certain reasonable financial levels 
levels that did not interfere with the 
economic and social progress of each 
country's program. 

Similarly, our examination of the 
future aviation products in Latin 
America involves as much a ques- 
tion of the relationship to the entire 
success of the Alliance for Progress 
as it does individual military sales. 

In the Middle East- our actiona are 
as much a part of attempting to 

(Continued on Page 20) 



Defense Industry Bulletin 




by 
A. N. Bayer 



Added to a progressive series of 
Navy planned actions in the area of 
improved management of technical 
logistics data and information is the 
promulgation of the "Navy Author- 
ized Data List (NADL)." The NADL 
a management technique is de- 
s'gned to identify, record and control 
every significant technical data re- 
quirement for which there exists a 
legitimate need in the Navy. 

The issuance of the Authorised 
Data List as a limited coordination 
Military Handbook, MIL-HDBK-222 
(Navy), provides a "master" refer- 
ence list from which Navy procuring 
activities are able to select and spe- 
cify data requirements for bids and 
proposals. Approved data items are 
included in DD Form 1423, "Contrac- 
tor Data Requirement List," Such 
specificity provides a basis for a full, 
clear and firm understanding be- 
tween the Navy and its contractors 
with respect to the total data require- 
ments at the time the contract is 
placed. 

What types and kinds of data are 
referenced in the NADL? It includes 
specifications, standards, engineering 
drawings, associated lists, data lists, 
hills of material, parts lists, technical 
manuals, handbooks and orders, engi- 
neering changes and control docu- 
ments, design data, provisioning parts 
lists and related initial support data, 
reliability, maintainability and other 
systems effectiveness documents, ac- 
ceptance test procedures, PERT time, 
cost and management information, 
personnel and human factors data, 
and reports (including scientific and 
technical reports). It includes without 
limitation those varieties of technical 
data (whether applicable to research, 
Tinea-ing, logistics, or other func- 



parent documents, particularly speci- 
fications. 

In compliance with the objectives of 
the DOD Standardization Program 
and the Armed Services Procurement 
Regulation (ASPR), Section 1, Part 
12, "Specifications, Plans and Draw- 
ings," the Navy has prepared many 
specifications for use in design and 
procurement of systems, end items, 
primary equipment, items, materials 
and services. In many instances, spe- 
cifications (as accurate and complete 
descriptions of the technical require- 
ments) include specific data require- 
ments in order that both the contrac- 
tor and the Government may readily 
determine that the total requirements 
have been met. The specification rep- 
resents an established system featur- 
ing a common language which per- 
mits, encourages and facilitates com- 
munication between the Military 
Services and industry. Established 
and well documented procedures exist 
for the coordination of specifications, 
and all data requirements in coordi- 
nated specifications represent joint 
Service agreements with generous in- 




dustry input. Deviations to specifica- 
tions are subjected to a degree of 
control which may not bo available in 
the case of unilateral decisions on de- 
viations to separate data item sheets 
or forms. 

Further, specifications are widely 
' recognized and used throughout in- 
dustry. They are recorded in the DOD 
Index of Specifications and Stand- 
ards (DODISS) and arc readily 
available from the DOD Single Stock 
Point. Accordingly, the concept and 
content of the NADL requires that a 
positive relationship be established to 
"data call-outs in specifications" 
(wherein the data requirements arc 
related to the hardware procurement 
or the task to be performed). The 
Navy intends to develop a fully pro- 
pared Form DD 1428 for most of its 
primary equipment or end item speci- 
fications. 

How can control he maintained over 
the generation of data requirements 
in parent documents? The Navy's ap- 
proach was elementary in regard to 
the tedious manual methods employed 
during 1 the review of source docu- 
ments. Yet, the approach was unique 
in that decisions over approved data 
items and the document sources of 
such items were recorded and pro- 
gramed for publication purposes by 
the use of automatic data processing 
methods. Some 40,000 documents (in- 
cluding- all Navy and other DOD co- 
ordinated specifications in the DOD 
Index of Specifications and Stand- 
ards) wore manually reviewed, page 
by page, paragraph by paragraph, in 
screening for 'data items. These 40,- 
000 documents, if stacked vertically, 
would be some SB feet in height, 
Every data item referenced in a docu- 
ment was identified and then cata- 
loged by means of. electric accounting 
punched card methods. . 

Non-approved data items were 
"scrubbed down and out." Approved 
data items were recorded as to the 
recognized identification number of 
the basic source document and to its 
applicable location (paragraph num- 
ber) in the document. Further iden- 
tification was made to the cognixanfc 
Navy material bureau technical code 
having primary responsibility over 
the data item. By this latter identifi- 
cation, continued engineering support 
is ensured by the "hardware" or 
"product" engineers who are called 
upon to determine applicable data 
items in fulfilling the DD 1423 re- 
quirements. As Navy source docu- 



June 1966 



p 



mt- 



ments are initiated or revised in the 
future, intra-departmental proce- 
dures have been established to main- 
tain mechanized control over the data 
items. 

For complete flexibility and opti- 
mum usage, the NADL is prepared 
by automatic data processing meth- 
ods and is arranged in four parts to 
permit entry and data selection on 
the basis of: 

* An "Alphabetical" Listing of Pri- 
mary (Hardware or Work Tasks) 
Documents arranged by the actual 
title (name) of the hardware or work 
task. 

e A "Numerical" Listing of Primary 
(Hardware or Work Tasks) Docu- 
ments arranged by the number of the 
applicable source material. 

A "Functional Category" Listing; 
of all data items grouped to serve a 
specific function (e.g., design data, 
configuration control, reliability, lo- 
gistics) . 

e An "Alphabetical" Listing of all 
data items which are included in 
basic source documents. 

The NADL contains some 1,800 dif- 
ferent data items. A specific data 
item, however, may have multi-appli- 
cation and use with several different 
types of hardware specifications. As 
a result, some 7,000 gross data item 
references have been recorded to- 
gether with their referenced applica- 
tion to some 2,(iOO source documents 
(e.g., specifications, contract require- 
ments bulletins). The NADL ap- 
proaches a true minimum-maximum 
data list far broader in scope and 
coverage than that of 400-500 gener- 
alized data forms which the Navy 
originally intended to adopt. An old 
adage is "the proof of the pudding 
lies in the eating." Extensive review 
of completed, contractually agreed 
upon DD 1423's reveals that over 86 
percent of the specified data items 
are "approved" data items which are 
included in the NADL. Such a high 
percentage of approved data items 
would not have been achieved if gen- 
eralized data forms had been adopted 
with no correlation to the basic source 
documents which require the data. 

Compilation of the NADL basically 
involves the consolidation (and re- 
duction) of many existing definitized 
data requirements. These data re- 
quirements in many instances are al- 
ready tailored to specific naval war- 
fare systems, subsystems, end items, 
equipment, or work tasks. Determina- 



tions of data items from the NADL 
are made by: 

" Utilizing a data Provisioning 
Check List Concept. 

Giving careful consideration to 
the immediately planned and probable 
use of the actual weapon system, item, 
or service to which the data relates. 

Selecting data items on the basis 
of the intended use(s) of the data. 

* Selecting data items only after an- 
alyzation of the various types of data 
contained in the data packages which 
are relate:! to the acquisition phases 
in which they are required. 

In what single document do Navy 
personnel obtain the necessary criteria 
and guidance to make the above 
data determinations? NAVMATINST 
4000.15, Nov. 20, 1VJ64, titled "Man- 
agement of Technical Data and In- 
formation A Policy Manual," in- 
corporates into a single publication 
comprehensive statements of policy 
and procedures to govern the man- 
agement of technical logistics data 
and information within the De- 
partment of the Navy. The instruc- 
tion applies to the acquisition c-f 
technical data, whether procured 
from contractors or prepared within 
the Navy, and its management in re- 
seai-ch, engineering-, technical re- 
quirements, maintenance, quality as- 
surance (including inspection), pro- 
curement and all other functions of 
the Navy, directly or indirectly con- 
cerned with such data. 

Docs the Navy support the in- 
creased emphasis being placed upon 
technical data management by DOD? 
Indeed so. In fact, in 19fiO the Navy 
conducted a departmental-wide re- 
view of the policies and procedures of 
the bureaus and field activities re- 
garding the acquisition, control and 
use of Nnvy-procm-ed drawings and 
technical data. Principal objectives of 
the review wei-c (1) to determine the 
strengths, weaknesses and controver- 
sial areas concerning the administra- 
tive, leg-nl, contractual, technical and 
operational aspects of technical data 
management and (2) to recommend 
specific corrective actions to elimi- 
nate discrepancies, reduce data pro- 
curement costs, insure optimum use of 
acquired technical data and increase 
competitive procurement through im- 
proved use of technical data pack- 
ages. 

As a direct result of the Navy re- 
view, SECNAV Instruction 4120,12, 
"Establishment of Requirements for 



Engineering Drawings, Associated 
Lists and Additional," was issue'd in 
December 19(30. This instruction was 
not only comprehensive but it was 
also unique in that it was: 

First to establish department-wide 
uniform procedures for limiting data 
requirements to those necessary to 
satisfy the Navy's intended uses, and 
to describe specific data generally 
needed for competitive procurement as 
well as for eight other principal in- 
tended uses of data (e.g., design ap- 
proval and evaluation, provisioning, 
maintenance) . 

o Fii-st to prescribe negotiating tech- 
niques and guides related to pricing 
of data. 

o First to prescribe means of satis- 
fying data needs by less costly meth- 
ods of preparation by using industry 
drafting standards. 

First to prescribe procedures to 
assure maintenance of data on items 
subject to continued Navy use and 
supply support to depict accurately 
changes or revisions in the items to 
which the data relates. 

First to provide for the organiza- 
tion and functions of Data Review 
Boards which review the establish- 
ment of data requirements and the 
acquisition of data. 

All of the above innovations, to- 
gether with additional DOD and 
Navy cost effectiveness implementing 
principles in the area of technical 
data management, are carried over in 
NAVMATINST 4000.16. 

Navy planning for the future pro- 
vides for the support of optimum 
uniformity and standardization of 
technical data management techni- 
ques throughout DOD as proposed by 
the Office of Technical Data and 
Standardization Policy in the Office 
of the Assistant Secretary of De- 
fense (Installations and Logistics). 
A joint task, under the chairmanship 
of that office, is the consideration of 
a DOD Authorized Data List 
(DADL). This task, incidentally, was 
proposed by the Navy. The concept 
of 'developing a DADL is based on 
the principle that there is consider- 
able commonality of data items both 
intra and interdepartmental-wise. It 
should also be recognized, however, 
that a substantial number of uncom- 
mon data requirements exist both in- 
tra and interdepartmental -wise. The 
Navy, although recognizing the con- 
cept of standard generalized data 

(Continued on Pago 18) 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



by 

Allan Koevcs 

Office of Civil Rights & Industrial Relations 
Office of Asst. Secretary of Defense (Manpower) 



As a result of concerted effort by 
several Federal Government agencies, 
a historic first was achieved in the 
agreement signed in April between the 
nation's, largest shipbuilder and the 
Equal Employment Opportunity Com- 
mission. 

The Newport News, Virginia, 
Shipbuilding & Drydock Co,, became 
the first major company to sign a 
comprehensive agreement covering its 
responsibilities and obligations in the 
area of equal employment opportun- 
ity. The pattern, established during 
the six days of intensive negotiation 
in Washing-ton, D.C., may well have 
a far-reaching: effect, for the correc- 
tion of discrimination, on other indus- 
tries. 

Secretary of Labor W. ' Willard 
Wirts, whose Office of Federal Con- 
tract Compliance directs Government 
agency contracting 1 officers in their 
equal employment opportunity pro- 
grams, said, "The successful comple- 
tion of these negotiations resulted 
from a concerted Government effort 
to make Equal Employment Oppor- 
tunity a fact at this major shipbuild- 
ing firm." 

The Newport News Shipbuilding 
and Drydock Co. builds nuclear sub- 
marines, aircraft carriers and other 
ships for the U. S. Government. Its 
contracts run into billions of dollars. 
The company presently employs 
about 20,000 persons, of whom about 
5,000 are Negroes. Its last report to 
the Government showed that only 32 
out of 1,997 persons employed in su- 
pervisory positions were Negroes. In 
addition, the report indicated that 
only six out of GOG apprentices en- 
rolled were Negroes. 

Based on this report, a determina- 
tion was made by the Departments 
of Defense and Labor that Newport 
News was in noncompliance with the 
rules and regulations carrying out 
the provisions of Executive Order 
1124G dealing with Federal contracts, 
Concurrently, 41 Negro employees 
filed employment discrimination 
charges under Title VII of the Civil 



Rights Act of 1904. The Civil Rights 
Act of 19G4, under Title; VII, pro- 
vides that relief from employment 
discrimination may be sought by in- 
jured parties. 

As a result of these actions, New- 
port Nmvs began conciliation sessions 
in an attempt to work out an agree- 
ment that would prove acceptable to 
all parties concerned. 

During the course of the meetings 
between the Government and New- 
port News, an order was issued by 
the Secretary of Labor directing all 
Federal agencies not to award con- 
tracts to Newport News until the 
agencies and the Department of La- 
bor were satisfied that the company 
was in compliance with the Execu- 
tive Order requiring equal employ- 
ment opportunity. Upon completion 
of the agreement, the Labor Depart- 
ment's order was rescinded, 

The remedial program, which the 
Government and the company devel- 
oped, reflects a program of full 
scale dynamic affirmative action de- 
signed to counteract effects of prior 
discrimination. 

Under the terms of the agreement, 
an outside expert, approved by the 
company and the Government, will 
evaluate jobs and pay rates in the 
Newport News plant to 'determine 
whether Negroes are being paid the 
same rates as whites doing: substan- 
tially equivalenE work. Where it is 
determined that Negroes are being 
paid discriminatory rates, they will 
be immediately raised to equivalent 
levels with white employees. 

A team of BOD equal employ- 
ment opportunity specialists will 
conduct a survey of key departments 
of the company to determine the pro- 
motion pattern of white employees 
over past years. The history of Ne- 
gro promotions will he compared to 
the white promotion profile and, 
where Negroes have not progressed 
accordingly, they will be promoted 
immediately. 

Provisions of the agreement pro- 
vide for the immediate promotion of 



three Negroes, who had filed charges, 
to supervisory positions and rapid 
conciliation of the complaints of the 
other 38 charging parties. The 
agreement further provides for; 

Opening of all job classifications 
to all employees without discrimina- 
tion. 

Complete elimination of segre- 
gated facilities. 

Revision of promotion policies 
and practices to improve opportuni- 
ties for qualified Negroes to and 
within supervisory levels. 

Improvements of transfer proce- 
dure to other departments for Ne- 
groes. 

9 Re-evaluation of Negro employee 
skills. 

Institution of training programs 
to develop and improve Negro skills. 

Promotion and pay adjustment 
on the basis of such evaluation and/ 
or training. 

Permitting qualified Negroes 
equal opportunity to apprenticeship 
programs and actively recruiting for 
such programs in Negro schools, 

Other major areas of agreement 
include the posting and issuance of 
a new nondiscrimination policy state- 
ment, signed by the president of the 
company. This statement, which is to 
be attached to the paycheck of each 
full-time employee within HO clays 
from the date of the signing of tha 
agreement, emphasizes the company's 
fundamental policy of providing 1 
equal opportunity in all areas of em- 
ployment practice and assuring that 
there shall be no discrimination 
against any person on grounds of 
race, color, religion, or national 
origin. 

The company plans to assemble all 
supervisory employees to read the 
policy statement to them, and advise 
them of the terms of the agreement. 
They will be informed that the im- 
portance of fulfilling company policy 
cannot be over-emphasized. They will 
bo told that any violation of the let- 

(ConUnucd on Page 18) 



June 1966 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

President Johnson has nominated 
General Earle G. Wheeler, USA, for 
his second two-year term as Chairman 
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. General 
Wheeler succeeded General Maxwell 
D. Taylor as Chairman of the Joint 
Chiefs' in 1964. 

Maj. Gen. Earl C. Hedlund, USAF, 
has been named to succeed Maj. Gen. 
Francis C. Gideon, USAF, as Dep. 
Dir., Defense Supply Agency, effective 
in July. . , 

Brig. Gen. William T. Smith, 
USAF, has been reassigned to duty as 
Chief of Staff, Defense Communica- 
tions Agency. . . , 

E. Grogan Shelor, Jr., has joined 
the Department of Defense as Asst. 
Dir. of Defense Research and Engi- 
neering (Communications & Elec- 
tronics). He succeeds Thomas F. 
Rogers, who has become Dep, Dir. of 
Defense Research and Engineering 
(Electronics and Information Sys- 
tems). , 

Brig. Gen. Glen J. McClermm, 
USAK, will take command of the De- 
fense Electronics Supply Center, Day- 
ton, Ohio, in July. , rr , , T , . 

Col. Robert E. Lee, USAF, has been 
designated Executive Dir. (Procure- 
ment and Production), Defense Sup- 
ply Agency. His nomination ior the 
rank of brigadier general has also 
boon approved. 

Col. William H. Herndoii, USA, has 
been named to succeed Capt. Andrew 
M. McCronc, SC, USN, as Commander, 
Defense Depot, DSA Mechanicsburg, 
Pa. Capt. McCronc has been reas- 
signed to the Navy Weapons Supply 
Activity, Washington, D.C. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Dr. Marvin E. Lasser has suc- 
ceeded Dr. Harold C. Weber, as Chici: 
Scientist in the. U. S. Army's Office 
of Research and Development. 

Lt. Gen. William II. Bunker, Dep. 
Commanding General, Army Materiel 
Command, was promoted to his pres- 
ent rank (hiring ceremonies held m 
Washington, May 9. 

The Army's top computer manager, 
Maj. Gen. J. E, Laudriim, will retire 
July 31. He will be replaced in the 
position of Special Asst. to the Chief 
of Staff (Information and Data Sys- 
tems) by Brig. Gen. Charles P. 
Brown, who has been designated for 
promotion to major general. 

Brig. Gen. John R. Guthrie has 
been appointed Dir. of Developments 
in the Office of the Chief of Research 
and Development, U. S. Army, 

Brig. Gen. Tlmrslon T. Paul, Jr, has 
been selected as Dir. of Plans and Pro- 
grams in the Office of the Chief of 
Research and Development. 

Brig. Gen. Edwin L. Donley has as- 
sumed command of Land Combat Sys- 
tems at the U.S. Army Missile Com- 
mand, Redstone Arsenal, Ala. Gen. 
Donley was promoted to his present 
rank upon taking command. 




Brig. Gen. Kenneth F. Dawalt has 
relieved Brig, Gen. William T. Ryder 

as Dep. Chief of Research and Devel- 
opment for International Programs in 
the Office of the Chief, Research and 
Development, U.S. Army. Gen. Ryder 
retires after SO years of: Army service. 
Brig. Gen. Kenneth II. Buyer has 
been assigned as Dir. of Research and 
Development, U.S. Army Materiel 
Command, succeeding Maj, Gen. Wil- 
liam C. Gribble, Jr. 

Brig. Gen. Harold M. Brown lias 
assumed duties as Dep. Chief of Com- 
munications-Electronics, Department 
of the Army. He succeeded Brig Gen. 
Lawrence P. Jacobs who has retired. 

Col, Warren R. King has been 
named Chief of Staff, U. S. Army 
Electronics Command, Fort Mon- 
mouth, N.J. Col. George A. Kurkijian, 
who has been .serving as Deputy and 
Acting Chief of Staff, will continue as 
Deputy. 

Col. Willard Roper is slated for as- 
signment as Dep. Dir. of Civil Works 
in the Office of the Chief of Engineers 
this summer. lie is now serving as 
District Engineer at Louisville. Ky. 

Col. Max McCord will succeed Col. 
Edwin J. Withers as Dir, of Real 
Estate in the Office of the Army Chief 
of Engineers, Washington, D.C. Col. 
Withers retired in November. W. _!-.. 
Berge has been serving as Acting Dir- 
ector since the colonel's retirement. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

RAdm. Harry J. P. Foley, Jr., SC, 

Dep. Commander for Plans and Policy 
at the Naval Supply Systems Com- 
mand, Washington, D.C. has been re- 
assigned as Commanding Officer of 
the Navy Aviation Supply Office, 
Philadelphia. 

UAdm. William P. Pctrovic has 
been named Dep, Commander for 
Shipyards and Program Dir. for Ship- 
yard Modernization at the Navy Ship 
Systems Command, Washington, D.C. 
He previously served as Commander, 
New York Naval Ship Yard. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Gen. Dean C. Strothcr, Commander- 
in-Chief, North American Air Defense 
Command/Continental Air Defense 
Command, is scheduled for retirement 
July 31, 1966. Lt. Gen. Raymond J. 
Reeves has been selected to succeed 
him. The new commander will assume 
his duties Aug. 1 and has been se- 
lected for promotion to four-star 
rank, 



Maj. Gen. Glen R. Birchard has 

been picked to head the Air Force 
Alaskan Command. He will take com- 
mand Aug. 1 and is nominated for 
promotion to the rank of lieutenant 
general. 

Brig. Gen. Edward W. Scott, Jr., 
will become Commander, European 
Exchange Service, in July. He is now 
serving as Commandant, Air Com- 
mand and Staff College, Maxwell 
APB, Ala. 

Col. Donald W. Howry has been re- 
assigned as Chief, Communications 
and Electronics Div., Directorate of 
Aerospace Programs, Headquarters, 
USAF. 

Col. Leonard K. Carson has boon 
named Dir. of Research Programs in 
the Oftice of Aerospace Research. 

Col. James R. Carter, now serving 
with the Pacific Air Force, has been 
selected as Chief, Advanced Programs 
Office, F-lll Special Project Office, 
Aeronautical Systems Div., Air Force 
Systems Command, Wright-Patterson 
AFB, Ohio. 

Col. Dan McKec, former Commander 
of Space Systems Divisions' Detach- 
ment 2 at Houston, Tex., has assumed 
a new role as Dep. for Unmanned Sys- 
tems, Space Systems Div., Air Force 
Systems Command, Los Angeles, Gain. 
The Electronic Systems Div., Air 
Force Systems Command, L. G. 
Hanscom Field, Mass., announces the 
following changes: 

Col. Emmett V. Colliding has been 
reassigned as Chief of the newly 
established Directorate of Communi- 
cations Development. Col. Robert L. 
Edge has been named to relieve Gol. 
Conkling as Dir. of the 473L USAF 
Command and Control System Pro- 
gram Office. Col. Robert J. Kuehn, 
now serving as Dep. for Command 
Systems, has been reassigned to the 
Joint U.S. Military Systems Group in 
Thailand. Col. Kuehn will be suc- 
ceeded by Col. Paul G. Galcntinc who 
moves from his present position us 
Dep. for Engineering and Technology. 
Col. Roy Morgan will serve as Acting 
Dep. for Engineering and Technology. 



Army-Air Force 

Exchange Service 

Will Move to Texas 

The U. S. Army and Air Force Ex- 
change Service, now headq\iartored in 
New York, will be relocated to the 
Fort Worth-Dallas, Tex., area with 
the move scheduled to be completed 
by summer 1967. 

The switch is part of a three-year 
improvement plan to modernize tli 
Exchange Service. It is estimated 
that the program will result in sav- 
ings of more than $3 million a year, 

The- Exchange Service provides a 
world-wide service to the Army and 
Air Force by operating cafeterias, 
snack bars and sales and service out- 
lets of various kinds at military in- 
stallations in the United States and 
in 34 foreign countries. 



11 



Address by Soc Dof Roberf S. McNamora 

(Continued from Pays />) . 

inappropriate while we are engaged 
in a shooting war. 

But I believe precisely the opposite 
is the case. It is more appropriate now 
than ever. For it would underscore 
what our whole purpose is in Vietnam 
and indeed anywhere in the world 
where coercion, or injustice, or lack 
of decent opportunity still holds sway. 
It would make meaningful the cen- 
tral concept of security: a world of 
decency and development where every 
man can feel that his personal hori- 
zon is rimmed with hope. 

Mutual interest, mutual trust, mu- 
tual effort those are the goals. Can 
we achieve those goals with the So- 
viet Union and with Communist 
China? Can they achieve them with 
one another? 

The answer to these questions lies 
in the answer to an even more fun- 
damental question. 
Who is man? 
la he a rational animal? 
If ho is, then the goals can ulti- 
mately ba achieved. 

If he is not, then there is little point 
in making tlie effort 

All the evidence of history suggests 
that man is indeed a rational animal, 
but with a near infinite capacity for 
folly. His history seems largely a halt- 
ing, but persistent, effort to raise his 
reason above his aiiimality. 

He draws blueprints for Utopia, but 
never quite gets it built. In the end, 
he plugs away obstinately with the 
only building material really ever at 
hand; his own part-comic, part-trag-ic, 
part-cussed, but part-glorious nature. 
I, for one, would not count a global 
free society out. 

Coercion, after all, merely captures 
man. Freedom captivates him. 



Small Business Success 

(Continued from Pago 5) 

But the key to the success of Sten- 
cel Corp. is the fact that the Defense 
Department is not unapproachable for 
small companies, even in areas pre- 
viously dominated by larger indus- 
tries. 

With this avenue of relationship 
open, new sources of expertise are 
continually being discovered by the 
Defense Department. And an in- 
evitable product of this approach is 
the opportunity for a small business 
with competent people and original 
thinking to obtain the kind of work 
which will help it grow into a suc- 
cessful enterprise. 



12 



Advisory Committee To Study 
Maritime Competitive Bid Procedures 



An advisory committee has been 
formed by the Navy to study and 
recommend means of establishing 
competitive bid procedures and cost 
analysis criteria for use by the Mili- 
tary Sea Transportation Service in 
dealing with the maritime industry. 
Forma ttion of the group is in lino 
with the recent ocean procurement 
policy statement of the Defense De- 
i tment , ff a Federal Maritime 
Hearing held April 4, 196G 

The group will work doscly ith 
Vice Admiral Glymi R. Donaho, 
Commander, Military Sea Transpor- 
tation Service. Members of the com- 
mittee are: 

Mr. Clarence Morse, Attorney, 
ban Francisco, Calif. (Former 
Administrator, Federal Mari- 
tune Commission.) 

Dr. Carl E. McDowell, Executive 
Vice President, American In- 
stitute of Marine Underwrit- 
ers, New York City. 



Mr. Alex C. Cocke, Marine Con 
sul tan t, New Orleans, La 
(Retired Vice President, Lykc: 
Steamship Lines.) 
Because of the general public in 
terest in the maritime field, and re- 
cent Congressional hearings on tin 
subject of ocean rates and proce- 
dures, the committee will evaluate 
alternative methods of developing 
competitive ocean rate structures ap 
plicable to the Military Services. T< 
establish criteria for the taxpayer 
the study group will furnish a for- 
mat for analysis of cost data to in- 
sure the establishment of equitable 
rates for movement of milita ry 
cargo. 

It is also anticipated that estab- 
lishment of this advisory committee 
will promote better understanding of 
ocean procurement problems under 
consideration by both military and 
industry. 



Landing System 
Tested by Air Force 

The Air Force is testing a new tac- 

^"* s ^> 

(Interim Remote Area 



' which wil1 provide an 
v n Tv ^ability under low 

viability conditions, s based on ac- 

of offS/H T 1C "t ' ld evalat?on 
( . tei ' niilial equipment. 

*r oC two 8 y stc are now 
studied at the Air Force In- 



proach for assauft landing. 
aro the 









(STATE) 



uy vlll _ ov , lm _ jsm'VJi 

Approach and Landing 
woup and is under " 



USAF To Contract 
for UFO Investigations 

The U. S. Air Force is taking 
steps to strengthen its program for 
the investigation of reports of uni- 
dentified flying objects (UPO) by 
seeking the aid of scientific and edu- 
cational institutions. 

Aid will be sought through con- 
tracts calling for prompt, in-depth 
investigation of selected UFO re- 
ports. Air Force officials are now dis- 
cussing the project informally with 
university and other scientific load- 
ers to determine their interest. 

Decision to award the contracts 
was baaed on a recommendation by 
the Air Force Scientific Advisory 
Board which reviewed the resources, 
methods and findings of Project Blue 
Book, the Air Force program to in- 
vestigate and evaluate UFO reports. 

In its report, which was submitted 
to the Air Force in March, the in- 
vestigating committee recommended 
expanding the program to include in- 
vestigation of selected sightings by 
independent scientists. 

The Air Force is preparing work 
statements for the new contracts 
now. Funds for them will he re- 
quested from FY 1967 and FY 1968 
budgets. 



DEFENSE PRIME CONTRACT AWARDS 
TO SMALL BUSINESS 



(Amounts in Thousands) 

P.,, L * Jll 'y 65-Mai-ch 66 

Procurement from All Firms $ 22 771 fiM 

e ' lt " SmaU B *V S ~r " * 22 ' 771 ' 884 

;:;:::::;:: 4i903 2ui 



July 64-Mareh 65 

$17,501,728 



3,627,720 
20.7 



June 1966 




Defense Procurement Circular No. 
41, April 29, 1966, (1) Occupational 
Deferment for Contractor Critical 
Employees. (2) Contractor Team 
Arrangements. (3) Revision of 
1-1410. (4) Fast Payment Pro- 
cedure. (5) Handling 1 of Obligations 
Under Government Property Clause. 
(6) Exceptions to Screening of Con- 
tractor Termination Inventory. (7) 
Equal Employment Opportunity. (8) 
Status Report on Defense Procure- 
ment Circulars. (9) Federal Excise 
Taxes. 



Microwave Radiometry and the Antimony Naphthalene. Solid State 



Each Defense Procurement Cir- 
cular is designed to place new or 
change:! policy or procedures in 
effect prior to publication of an 
Armed Services Procurement Reg- 
ulation (ASPR) revision. ASPR 
subscribers will receive DPC's and 
ASPR revisions through the Su- 
perintendent of Documents, U. S. 
Government Printing Office, 
Washington, D. C. 20402. 



Reliability Stress and Failure Kate, 
Data for Electronic Equipment, 
MIL-HDBK-217A. Provides an ap- 
proved source of parts failure rate 
data for predicting the potential re- 
liability of electronic equipment. The 
data provided are applicable cither 
early in the design when only an ap- 
proximate count of parts by part 
category is available, or later in the 
design when detailed information 
concerning part selection and appli- 
cation is available. 19(15. 394 pp. il. 
Catalog No. D7.6/2:217A. $2.25. 

U. S. Army Installations and Ma- 
jor Activities in the. Continental 
United States. Contains an alphabet- 
ical listing showing the post office 
address of each installation and an 
alphabetical listing within each 
Army area showing location of each 
activity. Nov. 1966. 19 pp. Catalog 
No. 0101.22:210-1/21 20c. 

The Air Almanac, 1966, May-Au- 
gust, This issue provides, in conve- 
nient form, the astronomical data 
required for air navigation, covering 
the period from May 1, 1966 to Sept. 
1, 1966. 1965. Catalog No. D213.7: 
966/2. $3.25. 



Publications that require remit- 
tance are available for purchase 
at U. S. Government Printing 
Office, Washington, D. C. 20402. 



Multilayer Board Application to 
RF Circuitry. Sylvania Electronic 
Defense Laboratories, for the Army, 
Nov. 1965, 46 pp. Order No. AD-629 
890, $2. 



NOLC X-Bfind Radio-Meter Pro- 
f/ram. Naval Ordnance Laboratory, 
Corona, Calif., Feb. 1966, 36 pp. 
Order No, AD-629 722. $2. 

Abstracts-Scientific and Engineer- 
ing Papers. MIT for the Air Force, 
June 1965, 188 pp. Order No. AD-G25 
694. $5. 

Experimental Determination of 
Pressure-Flow Characteristics of 
Army Membrane Otcyt/enator-Pro- 
totypes I and II. Army's Harry Dia- 
mond Laboratories, Washington, D, 
C, Jan. 19(16, 29 pp. Order No. AD- 
030 160. $2. 



Sciences Laboratory, Hanscom Field, 
Mass., Jan. 1966, 77 pp. Order No. 
AD-630 G09. $3. 

Fracture Behavior of Titanium in 
the Marine Environment. U.S. Navy 
Marine Engineering Laboratory, An- 
napolis, Mel., July 1965, 48 pp. Order 
No. AD-467 088. $2. 

Property Investigation of Copper 
Base Alloys at Ambient and Elevated 
Temperatures. ARO Inc., for the Air 
Force, July 1965, 46 pp. Order No. 
AD-467 015. $2. 

Survey of. Current Knowledge of 
the Deformation Ckwacteristics of 



The Role of Vestibular Organs in Ber/mm> thc R ,',fractory Metals and 
the Exploration of Sjmcc. Nava tilc y Supcr[Uoyt! , B attelle Memorial In- 
School of Aviation Medicine and atitute| ' Columbus, Ohio, for the Navy, 

Feb. 1966, 322 pp. Order No. AD-630 
427. $7. 

A Midtiaxial Fatigue Test for 
Evaluation of Plastics Composite Ma- 
terials. Naval Ordnance Laboratory, 
White Oak, Md., Feb. 1966, 81 pp. 
Order No. AD-630 434. $2. 

Investigation of the Physical-Chem- 
ical Nature of thc, Matrix-Reinforce- 
ment Interface. Dow Corning Corp., 
Midland, Mich., for the Air Force;, 
Sept. 1965, 144 pp. Order No. AD-629 
777, $4. 

Investigation, of a Laser Triggered 
Spark Gap. Air Force Institute of 



NASA Office of Advanced Research 
& Technology, Jan. 1965, 391 pp. 
Order No. N-06-16106. $2.25. 

Proceedings of tfic Conference on 
Atmospheric Contamination in Con- 
fined Spaces. Air Force Aerospace 
Medical Research Laboratories, Dec. 
1965, 324 pp. Order No. AD-629-622. 
$7. 

A Thermal Radiation Heat Source 
and Imaging System for Bimncdical 
Research. D, L. Richardson, Arthur 
D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., for 
the Navy, Dec. 1965, 48 pp. Order No. 
AD-629 590. $2. 

Laminar Flow Regimes for Rigid- 
Sphere Suspensions. Itek's Research 
and Development, Palo Alto, Calif., 
for the Air Force, Feb. 19G6, 79 pp. 
Order No. AD-629 312. $3. 

Optical Communications Employing 
Semiconductor Lasers. MIT's Lincoln 
Laboratory for the Air Force, June 

1965, 73 pp. Order No. AD-630 243. 
$3. 

Investigation of Precision Antenna 
Pattern 'Recording & Display Tech- 
niques. Scientific- Atlanta, Inc., Ga., 
For the Air Force, Feb. 1960, 157 pp. 
Order No. AD-630 124. $5. 

Improved Heat Transfer in Multi- 
stage Flash Evaporation. N'aval Civil 
Engineering Laboratory, Port Hue- 
neme, Calif., Dec. 1965, 29 pp. Order 
No. AD-62G 267. $2. 

Table of Thcrmodyna-mic Properties 
and Chemical Composition of Nitro- 
gen in Chemical Equilibrium Includ- 
ing Second Virial Corrections from 
1600K to 15,000 K. National Bureau 
of Standards, for the Air Force, April 

1966, 309 pp. Order No. AD-630 461. 
$7. 

Evaluation, of Inorganic Nitrates as 
Heat Tent Standards, Army Picatinny 
Arsenal, Dover, N.J., Dec. 1965, 46 
pp. Order No. AD-626 171. $2. 

Experimental Study of Zone Refin- 
ing of the Binary System Triphenyl 



Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, 
Ohio, March 1966, 27 pp. Order No. 
AD-G29 905. ?2. 

New Sources of Electrical Energy 
fw Ships. Russian work dated 1905 
and translated by the Navy, 122 pp. 
Order No. AD-630 285. $4. 

Investigation of Cathode Phenom- 
ena in the Mercury Arc. Space 
Sciences, Inc., Waltham, Mass., for 
the Air Force, Fob. 1966, 146 pp. 
Order No. AD-629 869. $4. 

Human Factors as they Affect 
Methods Improvement in Construc- 
tion. Stanford University, for the 
Navy, Sept. 1964, 65 pp. Order No. 
AD-628 940. $3. 



Government Research and devel- 
opment reports are available to 
science and industry at price indi- 
cated from: 
Clearinghouse for Federal And 

Scientific Information 
Department of Commerce 
Springfield, Va. 22151 

Authorized DOD contractors and 
grantees may obtain these docu- 
ments without charge from: 
Defense Documentation Center 
Cameron Station 
Alexandria, Va. 22314 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



13 




by 

Maj. Gen. H. J. Sands, Jr., USAF 

Commander, Ballistic Systems Div. 

Air Force Systems Command 



"When industry visitors to our Bal- 
listic Systems Division (BSD) head- 
quarters at Norton AFB, Calif., query 
us on what's new, the answer is 
mostly, "Minutcman." 

In an er.a which may seem decep- 
tively quiet after the days when we 
were deploying three different types 
of missiles simultaneously, the Min- 
uteman has proved itself much more 
than the solidly established mainstay 
of our present operational missile 
strength. It is demonstrating that it 
is also the best grafting stock de- 
veloped to date in our United States 
missile program, Its remarkable po- 
tential for improvement bids fair to 
make this latest and liveliest of our 
long-range aerospace weapons the 
Methuselah of U. S. strategic mis- 
siles with the difference that longev- 
ity does not mellow, but magnifies, 
its capabilities. 

This capacity for flexible evolu- 
tion makes the Minuteman not only 
continuing news, but a one-package 
summary of technological trends and 
progress at any given time. Indeed, 
a major problem, since development 
of the system was begun in 1958, has 
been to freeze its evolution even 
long enough to get an operational 
force deployed. Consideration of 
present Minuteman development and 
planning is one of the most effective 
means of getting a bird's eye view of 
significant trends in ballistic system 
weaponry. The Minuteman accurately 
reflects both the remarkable accom- 
plishments of industry in missile 
technology, and the continuing em- 
phases and needs of the Air Force. 

We now have an operational Min- 
uteman force of better than 800 



ly modified guidance and control sys- 
tem features microminiaturized elec- 
tronics and gives the missile twice 
the accuracy of Minuteman I. The 
missile will have a new capability 
for launch by signal from SAC's 
airborne command post. Modifica- 
tion of the ground environment de- 
creases the vulnerability of the 
weapon system to enemy attack. 
Greater flexibility of targeting has 
also been built into this new version 
of the Minuteman. 

The most fundamental change in 
the Minuteman II, however, is its 
second-stage engine with a larger 
engine chamber loaded with an im- 
proved propellant which delivers 
nearly 50 percent more total energy. 
End result of this and other pro- 
pulsion improvements is an in- 
crease of more than 2,000 miles in 
the range of the missile or an op- 
tion for a significant increase in 
payload. 



The first five wings of our Min- 
uteman force are scheduled to be 
converted from the Minuteman I to 
the Minuteman II in a billion dol- 
lar force modernization program 
which is just getting under way. 
The existing silos and ground equip- 
ment with necessary modifications will 
be used for the Minuteman II missiles. 
At a fraction of the cost of deploying 
a new weapon system, we will be able 
to graft upon the Minuteman I stock 
modification which, in actual fact, will 
give us the capabilities of a new, 
greatly advanced weapon system. 

And now, waiting in the wings 
for development and announced by 
President Johnson in his January 
budget request to Congress, is the 
Minuteman III. 

Even the Minuteman cannot go 
on forever, of course. To attempt 
to push too far reliance upon its 
adaptability would be a dangerous 
delusion. The time must inevitably 
come when the state of the art 
bursts the seams of the whole missile 
system as originally conceived, when 
modifications overwhelm the original 
configuration and are no longer 
practical, and a total new integrated 
approach is needed. That is why we 
have already begun studies on at 
least two other missile systems to 
supplement or supersede the Min- 




on the 



.me O i/,c ui. me second stage solid propellant rocket motor of the new 

Cape Kennedy and Vandenberg Minutcman II ICBM is compared with the smaller second stage motor for 
AFB, incorporates the results of Minuteman I. The Minuteman II unit, with its single nozzle, is larger, more 
major advances of the past several P 6 *. . and . has ***&* r *"S* than the older four-nozzlcd model. The 
it, i iu t Q u, MiJ .A 7 oWer -vehicle is steered on command, while Minuteman II U maneuvered 
yeais in missile technology. A great- by Vlid in j cct O na into the nozzle which deflect the exhaust stream. 



14 



June 1966 



uteman, depending upon develop- 
ments. 

Any missile which succeeds the 
Minuteman, or supplements it in 
years to come, will be the direct 
lineal descendant of the "instant mis- 
sile" in most significant respects. 
Many of the technological building 
blocks which will he used in future 
missiles are being developed now for 
the Minuteman, are being put to the 
test in its successive versions, and 
refined and re-designed in the light 
of our advancing- experience with the 
"ace-in-the-hole." 

Propulsion advances, for instance, 
which account for the greatly ex- 
tended range of the Minuteman II, 
foreshadow even more significant 
developments of the near future. The 
new ]>ropellant, which has the jaw- 
breaker name of carboxy-terminated 
poly butadiene, has a much higher 
specific impulse than the solid fuel 
used in earlier versions of the mis- 
sile. Its greater punch is further 
augmented by the use of a single 
noxKle, which is more efficient than 
the previous four nozzles, and by a 
liquid injection thrust vector control 
system for control of the missile dur- 
ing second-stage operation. This last 



makes the missile more quickly re- 
sponsive to the commands of its 
guidance and control system. 

Of course, our work in propellants 
goes far beyond what is embodied in 
present versions of the Minuteman. 
We are also investigating both larger 
and small propulsion systems, and 
doing extensive nozzle research. We 
are studying storable metallized 
thixotropic fuelsjelled propellants 
holding metal powder in suspension 
which combine some of the best 
properties of solid and liquid cryo- 
genic fuels. We are exploring adap- 
tation of the Polaris "cold launch," 
i. e., propelling a missile from the 
silo by gas and igniting it in the 
air. The launch site chosen for our 
work with cold launch techniques to 
date is a Minuteman silo. 

The Minuteman II also reflects the 
active research going forward today 
to develop new materials for high 
temperature ballistic system applica- 
tions and light-weight materials of 
great tensile strength, special shield- 
ing properties against radiation and 
special qualities for minimum radar 
"observability." In the gimbal struc- 
ture of the Minuteman II, for exam- 
ple, we have the first large usage of 







The first stupe motor for the Athena test missile is maneuvered in position 
on launching tracks. It will be mated with the second stage, then finally with 
the accelerating package which carries the third and fourth stages and the 
ncedleiioscd re-entry vehicle. This is a scaled down model of an intercontinental 
ballistic missile (ICBM) nosecone in which various types of warhead aids are 
tested. 



beryllium, the lightest in weight of 
all stable metals, much lighter than 
steel, yet stronger. 

In the area of guidance and con- 
trol, too, one of the highest pay-off 
areas in terms of mission effective- 
ness, the Minuteman II is a 1 trail 
blazer. In addition to the tremendous 
savings in weight and bulk, the mi- 
crominiaturized integrated circuits of 
the system create the "most perform- 
ance per pound" we have yet been 
able to condense into a missile sys- 
tem. A modified guidance and control 
coupler is the electronic link he- 
tween the missile's digital computer 
"brain" and the missile combat crew 
located in a launch contro 1 facility. 

Though Minuteman II's guidance 
system doubles the accuracy of the 
missile, we are still pushing for im- 
provements through such additional 
aids to the basic inertial guidance 
system as radio, stellar tracking and 
terminal guidance. 

One of the most active areas of 
progress in the ballistic missile ef- 
fort is re-entry technology. At Bal- 
listic Systems Division headquarters 
we run a joint Air Force- Army- 
Navy program called ABRES (Ad- 
vanced Ballistic Re-Entry System). 
Of all our individually designated 
programs, ABRES, next to the Min- 
uteman itself, receives the largest 
share of our BSD resources and ener- 
gies. 

Its purpose is to develop the tech- 
nological base for progressively im- 
proving the capabilities of our re- 
entry systems. Unlike "new wine in 
old bottles," a new re-entry system 
on an "old" missile can be an eco- 
nomical route to great gains in mis- 
sion capability. Among the major 
efforts in this program are; 

Improving the material makeup 
of re-entry systems to survive the 
natural hazards of re-entry into the 
atmosphere. 

Improving the accuracy with 
which the system finds its target. 

Devising decoys and other means 
of evading or confusing enemy anti- 
missile action, 

Increasing the effective payload 
which can be delivered by each mis- 
sile launched. 

A special four-stage, sub-scale 
missile, the Athena, has been de- 
veloped to test new re-entry system 
concepts and designs. It is launched 
from heavily instrumented facilities 
at Green River, Utah, to impact on 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



15 



tlu> test range at White Sands, N. M. 
Full-scale testing is done witli modi- 
fied Atlas boosters launched over the 
Western Test Range out of Vamlen- 
bei-p AFU. 

The Mimitoman has boon our No. 
1 "ft ii. s torn or" for AURES and indus- 
try re-entry system developments. 
With each .successive re-entry system 
the weapon system as a whole has 
taken on a different character and 
increased capabilities. We have Min- 
uteman "missiles with three different 
re-entry systems in our presently de- 
ployed operational force. The Mark 
12 re-entry system will be one of the 
major improvements in the future. 
The Mark 17 re-entry vehicle is in- 
tended for use on both the Minute- 
man II and III. The excellent results 
which can lie obtained by grafting 
improved re-entry system capabilities 
upon the Minuteman are an impor- 
tant factor in keeping the weapon 
system abreast of our defense re- 
quirements far beyond the normal 
life expectancy of such a system in 
today's climate of rapid technological 
evolution. When we do finally retire 
this hardy little Methuselah of mis- 
siles, it will leave to its successors, 
as an invaluable "building block," a 
decade of concentrated, practically 
tested progress in the re-entry field. 
The Minuteman promises to have 
as many lives as a cat. And in each 
one of them it is making a contribu- 
tion to both our present and our fu- 
ture deterrent defenses. 




The Bureau of the Budget (BOB) 
gave approval during May 1966 to the 
semi-annual contractor reporting re- 
quirements prescribed by the Depart- 
ment of Defense and National Aero- 
nautic and Space Administration Eco- 
nomic Information System ( EIS ) . 
EOB's approval followed extensive 
coordination with industry represent- 
atives by Defense and NASA officials, 

The Economic Information System 
was developed jointly by DOD and 
NASA. The DOD effort is under the 
direction of Dr. Stephen Enke, Deputy, 
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Sys- 
tems Analysis) for Economics. 

This system is one of several DOD 
projects designed to measure the eco- 
nomic impact of defense programs. 
Although the policy of DOD is such 
that economic impact will not influ- 
ence program acquisition decisions, it 
is important that DOD as well as 
state, local and other organizations, 
take such actions us may be desirable 
to alleviate adverse consequences of 
shifts in defense procurement pro- 
grams. 

EIS originated in 1961 as part of 
an effort to assess the economic im- 
pact of defense procurement on plants 
and communities. In 1965 BOB gave 



data on total employment according to 
four major categories -DOD, NASA, 
Other Government, and Commercial. 

, The Individual Project Report pro- 
vides data on employment, costs, cost 
distribution over time and contract 
information, and will be prepared 
for each individual project (major 
weapon system or major element 
thereof) having :l!">() or more direct 
workers on the project. 

One of the series in the De- 
fense Contractors Planning Report 
(DCPR), the DD Form 140.1 (Plant 
Data), is deleted as a reporting re- 
quirement by EIS. 

Report forma and instructions 
were mailed to approximately 000 
plants during May Iflfifl. Completed 
reports were to be submitted within 
30 days of receipt. This first report 
will contain actual data Cor the six 
month periods ending June I9G5 and 
December 1965 and forecasts of linn 
business based on contracts awarded 
through April 80, 19(i(i. 

-Although both the Economic In- 
formation System and the Cost In- 
formation Reports are designed to 
collect data on weapon systems de- 
velopment and production, they 




JULY 

First International Conference on 
Hemorheology, July 10-16. at the Uni- 
versity of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 
Sponsor: Office of Naval Research. 
Contact: Miss Suxanne Kronhcim, 
Physiology Branch (Code 441), Of- 
fice of Naval Research, Washington, 
D.C.. 20360 (Area Code 202) OXford 
6-1795. 

National Classification Management 

Society 19G6 Seminar, July 13-15, in 
Los Angeles, Calif. Non-members 
who desire to attend contact: Mr. 
Richard J. Boherg, Seminar Chairman, 
NCMS National Seminar, P.O. Box 
2089, Culver City, Calif., 90230. 

ICRPG/ATAA Solid Propulsion 

Conference, week of July 13, in Wash- 
ington, D.C. Contact: Mr. P. J. Martin, 
Chemical Propulsion Information 
Agency, 8621 Georgia Ave., Silver 
Spring, Md., 20910. (Area Code 301) 
589-7700, ext. 560. 

1 1960 Annual Conference on Nuclear 

and Space Radiation Effects, July 18- 
22, at Stanford University, Palo Alto, 
Calif. Sponsors: Army Research Of- 
fice, Institute of Electrical and Elec- 
tronics Engineers, National Aeronau- 
tics and Space Administration, Office 
of Naval Research and the Air Force. 
Contact: Lt. Col. J. E. Houseworth, 
Physical Sciences Div., Army Re- 
search Office, Washington, D.C. (Area 
Code 202) OXford 4-344G. 

Third International Pharmacology 
Congress, July 24-30, at University 
City, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Sponsors: 
Brazilian Federal Government, Gov- 
ernment of the State of Sao Paulo, 
University of Sao Paulo and the U.S. 
I Air Force Office of Scientific Research. 
Contact: Dr. Harvey E. Savely, 
(SRL), Air Force 'Office of Scientific 
Research, Tempo-D, 4th and Inde- 
pendence, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
(Area Code 202) OXford 6-6189. 



AUGUST 

Electron Spin Resonance Spcctro- 
scopy Seminar, Aug. 1-3, at Michigan 
fatate University, East Lansing, Mich. 
Sponsors: Army Research Office-Dur- 
ham, Atomic Energy Commission, 
American Chemical Society and Mich- 
igan State University. Contact: Dr. 
David R, Squire, Chemistry Div., 
Army Research Office-Durham, Box 
CM, Duke Station, Durham, N.C., 
27706. (Area Code 919) 286-2285. 

1966 Linguistic Institute Conference 
on Linguistic Method, Aug. 1-3, at the 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



University of California at Los 
Angeles. Sponsor: Air Force Office of 
Scientific Research. Contact: R. W. 
Swanson (SRI), Air Force Office of 
Scientific Research, Washington, D.C., 
20333. (Area Code 202) OXford 
6-5374. 

Eleventh International Symposium 
on Combustion, Aug. 14-20, at the 
University of Calif ornia, Berkeley, 
Calif. Co-sponsors: Ballistic Research 
Laboratory and the Combustion Insti- 
tute of Pittsburgh, Pa. Contact: Dr. 
R, J. Heaston, Physical Sciences Div. 
Army Research Office, 30-113 Columbia 
Pike, Arlington, Va. ( (Area Code 202) 
OXford 4-3465. 

Second Computer & Information 
Sciences Symposium on Learning, 
Adaptation and Control in Informa- 
tion Systems, AUR-. 22-24, at Colum- 
bus., Ohio. Sponsors: Office of Naval 
Research, Hattelle Memorial Institute 
and Ohio State University. Contact : 
Julius T. Tou, COINS Co-Chairman, 
Director, Communications Science Re- 
search Center, Battolle Memorial In- 
stitute, Columbus, Ohio, 43201. 

Application of Generalized Func- 
tions to System Theory Conference, 
Aug. 25-26, at the State University of 
New York. Stony Brook, N.Y. Co- 
si>onsors; Air Force Office of Scien- 
tific Research and Society for Indus- 
trial and Applied Mathematics. Con- 
tact: Capt. John Jones, Jr. (SRMA), 
Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 
Washington, D.C., 20333. (Area Code 
202) OXford 64302. 

Unguided Rocket Ballistics, Aug. 
30~Sept. 1, at Texns Western College, 
El Paso, Tex. Sponsor: Army Elec- 
tronics Research & Development 
Agency. Contact: V. C. Cochran, 
Army Electronics Research & Devel- 
opment Agency, White Sands Missile 
Range, N.M., 88002. 

Logic, Computability and Auto- 
mata, date and place undetermined. 
Co-sponsors: Hughes Aircraft Co, and 
the Rome Air Development Center. 
Contact: C. A, Constantino (EMID), 
Rome Air Development Center, Grif- 
fiss AFB, N.Y,, 13440. 

Ocean Electronics Symposium, Aug. 
29-31, at Honolulu, Hawaii, Sponsor: 
Hawaii Section, Institute of Electrical 
and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 
Contact: Robert R. Hill, Chairman, 
IEEE Ocean Electronics Symposium, 
Headquarters, 1441 Kapiolani Blvd., 
Suite 1320, Honolulu, Hawaii 96814, 



SEPTEMBER 

U.S. National Committee for Pure 
and Applied Biophysics in connection 
with the Second International Bio- 
physics Congress, Sept. 5-9, in 
Vienna, Austria. Sponsor: Office of 
Naval Research. Contact: Mrs. P. H. 
Tcnmswood, Code 444 Office of Naval 
Research, Washington, D.C., 203GO. 
(Area Code 202) OXford 6-1538. 

Symposium on Galio-Marinide, Sept. 
26-27, in Wales and England. Spon- 
sor: Research and Technology Div., 
AFSC. Contact: R. W. Rnnnells 
(AVN), Air Force Avionics Labora- 
tory, Research and Technology Div., 
AFSC, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 
45433. (Area Code 518) 253-7111, ext. 
53802. 

Sixth Annual National Conference 
on Environmental Effects on Aircraft 
and Propulsion Systems, Sept. 26-28, 
at Princeton, N.J. Sponsor: Naval Air 
Turbine Test Stations. Contact: Den- 
nis A. Wysocki, Conference Vice 
Chairman, Naval Air Turbine Test 
Station, P.O. Box 171G, 1440 Parkway 
Ave., Trenton, N.J., 08607, (Area 
Code 609) 882-1414, ext. 355. 

Sixth Symposium on Naval Hydro- 
dynamics, Maneuverability. Waves 
and Physics of Fluids, Sept. 29-30, 
Oct. 3-4, at Washington, D.C. Spon- 
sor: Office of Naval Research. Con- 
tact: Mr. S. W. DoroiY, Office of Naval 
Research, Code 438, Washington.. D.C,, 
203GO. (Area Code 202) OXford 
6-1433. 



OCTOBER 

Tenth Annual Organic Chemistry 

Conference, Oct. 4-5, at Natick, Mass. 
Co-sponsors: Army Natick Labora- 
tories and the NAS-NRC Advisory 
Board on Military Personnel and Sup- 
plies. Contact: Louis Long, Jr., Head, 
Organic Chemistry Laboratory, Army 
Natick Laboratories, Natick, Mass. 
(Area Code 617) 653-1000, ext. 414. 

Colloquium on the Photographic In- 
teraction Between Radiation and 
Matter, Oct. 26-27, at Washington, 
D.C. Co-sponsors; Air Force Office of 
Scientific Research and the Society of 
Photographic Scientists and Engi- 
neers. Contact: Dr. Amos G. Homey 
(SRC), Air Force Office of Scientific 
Research, Washington, D.C., 20333. 
(Area Code 202) OXfovd G-8705. 



17 



Packaging Courses Open Air Force Expands BUIC DOD Technical 

To Defense Industry Aerospace Control System Term Glossary Available 



The Joint Military Packaging 
Training- Center, Aberdeen Proving 
Ground, Aid., has announced that in- 
dustrial representatives will lie ac- 
cepted for enrollment in the extension 
course program. 

Industry students should be super- 
visory level personnel, packaging 
specialists, or packaging engineers. 
Enrollment is limited to business con- 
cerns which have contracts with the 
Defense Department. 

Training- covers the approved DOD 
policies, methods and techniques of 
military preservation, packaging, 
packing, 'inspection, loading of mili- 
tary supplies and equipment, and spe- 
cialized courses as established by cur- 
rent Government specifications and 
other military directives. 

For infonnation contact: Director, 
Joint Military Packaging Training 
Center, Attn: AMXPT-A, Aberdeen 
Proving Ground, Md. 21005, phone 
(Area Code SOI) 272-1000. 

Courses available are: 



Course Number & Title 
8B_-FI (JT) Preservation & 



Intermediate 
Plia.se I. 



Protection, 



8B-F2(JT) Packing & Car- 
loading, Phase II. 

822-F4(JT) Basic Pack- 
ing. 

8B-F3(JT) Preservation & 
Packaging. Phase III. 

8B-F6(JT) Missile Pack- 
aging. 

8B-FG(JT) Equipment 
Preservation for Ship- 
ment or Storage. 

8B-F7(JT) Preparation of 
Freight for Air Shipment. 

SB-FS(JT) Inspection of 
Packaged & Packed 
Household Goods for 
Storage & Shipment. 

8B-F4(JT) Packaging Ad- 
ministration. 



SB-PIG(JT) 
Design 



Packaging 



Length 

2 weeks 
2 weeks 
2 weeks 

1 week 

2 weeks 

2 weeks 
1 week 

1 week 

3 days 

2 weeks 



Army To Get New Portable 
Combat X-Ray Units 

Army medics will soon have the 
Help of X-Rays in treating combat 

XT 1 " 1 ? rt riBht , n the battlefield 
through the use of a new lightweight 
X-Ray unit and a portable, spring- 
drive X-ray polaroid film processor. 
Designed for ragged use by forward 
aiea medical units, both pieces of 
equipment have been tested success- 
fully in Vietnam under combat condi- 

tl OllS. 



18 



The Air Force has launched a de- 
velopment program aimed at 
strengthening the nation's secondary 
aerospace control system known as 
BUIC (Back-Up Interceptor Con- 
trol). 

BUIC's D825 electronic computers, 
which provide a high-speed surveil- 
lance and control system furnishing' 
up-to-the-minute information on air- 
borne threats to the North American 
continent, will be enlarged under the 
program and additional TV-type dis- 
play consoles added at each site to 
increase defense posture. 

BUIC is a stand-by, monitor sys- 
tem which automatically takes over 
the continental air defense task if 
the Air Force's primary system, 
SAGE (Semi-Automatic Ground En- 
vironment), becomes inoperative. 

To accomplish the expanded capa- 
bility of BUIC the Air Force Sys- 
tems Command's Electronic Systems 
Division has awarded a $14,050,000 
contract to the Burroughs Corp, of 
Paoli, Pa, 

Overall management of the BUIC 
program is provided by the 41GM 
System Program Office headed by 
Colonel Frank L. Ayres, at the Air 
Force Systems Command's Electronic 
Systems Division, L. G. Hanscom 
Field, Mass. Systems engineering is 
provided by the Mitre Corp. and com- 
puter programming for the system by 
the System Development Corp, 



AIR FORCE AND FAA 

DEVELOP ALL-WEATHER 

LANDING SYSTEM FOR C-141 

An all-weather landing system, de- 
veloped jointly by the U.S. Air Force 
and the Federal Aviation Agency, 
will be installed on all C-141 Star- 
Inters. The new landing system will 
enable the huge fanjet cargo-troop 
carriers to land safely under adverse 
weather conditions, at both improved 
airfields and in remote or combat 
areas where a minimum of ground- 
landing aids may be available. 

. The system, while similar to those 
in use in commercial aircraft, is more 
complex because it must be more 
nearly self-sufficient. Its basic func- 
tion is to program the aircraft's flight 
path, speed, angle of approach and 
attitude at various points in the ap- 
proach and touchdown path The 
system will generate and provide the 
necessary information either to the 
pilot, who then flies the proper path 
and speeds or to the autopilot which 
Hies the plane automatically 



The Defense Department has 
issued a new glossary of scientific 
and technical terms used in its tech- 
nical data and standardization pro- 
grams. 

Under the title "Department of 
Defense Technical Data and Stand- 
ardization Glossary," the new manual 
is based on several previous but less 
comprehensive compilations and in- 
cludes terms found in directives, in- 
structions, regulations and orders re- 
lating to these programs. 

Copies of the glossary aro avail- 
able to industry representatives by 
order from the U.S. Naval Supply 
Depot 5801 Tabor Ave., Philadel- 
phia, Pa. 13120. 



Navy Authorized Data List 

(Cotitinwid prom Page, !)) 

forms for common DOD data items, 
considers that use of standard gencr- 
alif.ed data forms may not bo prac- 
ticable for covet-ago of many uncom- 
mon data items when .such itomn art; 
adequately covered by existing source! 
documents. Further, standard gener- 
alized data forma may not be prac- 
ticable for data requirements covered 
l>y coordinated DOD specifications. 

Industry's assistance is needed in 
the undertaking and coordination of 
the DADL. With adequate support 
from industry, the Navy feels confi- 
dent that the task group will develop 
a practical and useful DOD Author- 
ized Data List. 



Equal Employment Opportunity 

(Continued from Page. 10) 

tor or spirit of company policy by 
any employee shall result in disci- 
plinary action including-, where ap- 
propriate, termination of employ- 
ment. 

While a great deal remains to ho 
done in carrying out the terms of the 
agreement its effect has already been 
noted. The National Association for 
the Advancement of Colored People 
has referred to the agreement as 
"exemplary." Donald A. Holdon, 
president of the Newport News 
Shipbuilding and Drydock Co., 
stated, "We are proud of our part in 
working out this agreement," He 
added that the agreement repre- 
sented an effective and responsible 
effort to achieve genuine equality of 
opportunity for Negroes. 

June 1966 



by 

Oscar Gaylc 

Joint Military Packaging Training Center 
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Mil. 



Have you ever had trouble distin- 
guishing between the letters Bee, Cee, 
Doe and Eee? You are not alone 
so have the Military and Govern- 
ment Services. The international pho- 
netic alphabet adopted after World 
War II further clarified the system 
to reduce the audible misunderstand- 
ing of those letters that sound alike 
and has proved very effective. 

Packaging procurement and opera- 
tions arc keyed directly to our speci- 
fication system, whose revisions and 
amendments are indicated by many 
same sounding- letters, so we want to 
make it clear that MIL-P-110 "Echo" 
has nrrived. After extended discus- 
sions, Service-wide coordinations and 
compromises, the "Echo" revision of 
MIL-P-11G, "Preservation, Methods 
Of," was published Nov. 1, 19G5, 
superseding MIL-P-11G "Delta" 
dated Sept. 29, I960. 

To those engaged in military pack- 
aging, this revision is very impor- 
tant as the new specification includes 
several major changes which will 
have wide impact. 

Deletions and additions have been 
made to the list of P-type preserva- 
tives and methods of unit protection, 
and significant changes have been 
made in the quality assurance . pro- 
visions. Because of these changes, the 
list of applicable documents, section 
2 of the specification, also had to be 
revised, 

One of the most evident changes 
in MIL-P-116E is in table I the list- 
ing of military approved temporary 
preservative compounds. Five long 
familiar preservatives have been de- 
leted. They are the petrolatum based 
compounds P-4 and P-5 (classes 2 
and 3 of MIL-C-11798) ; one rust 
inhibited oil, P~8 (MIL-L-SBOS) ; one 
special preservative for brightwork, 
P-13 (MIL-W-3688); and the thixo- 
tropic oil, P-16 (MIL-C-6545). P-19, 
identified as grade 4 of MIL-C-10178, 
was previously added by Amendment 
No. 1 to MIL-P-116; and this latest 
revision adds P-20, lubricating oil, 
contact and volatile corrosion inhib- 
itor treated. This preservative oil 
should turn out to be one of our 
most useful preservatives, especially 
in the preparation of vehicles for 
storage, as the VCI vapors will pene- 
trate to almost inaccessible areas and 
greatly enhance the overall protection 
of many critical parts. 

Here we can recognize definite 



signs of progress in preservation 
techniques. Hard drying, gummy 
compounds, difficult to apply and still 
more difficult to remove, are giving 
way to multipurpose, easy-to-use, 
preparations which are more than 
equivalent in their protective abilities. 

Another far-reaching change which 
also reflects current technology in the 
state of the art is in the section of 
methods of unit protection. Here we 
find that not only have five rarely 
used submethods of packaging been 
deleted and two new ones, which 
embody the latest in packaging tech- 
niques, added but a whole new 'family 
of packaging materials lias been in- 
cluded, These are the unsupported 
plastic films of Military Specifications 
MIL-P-22191. 

The submethods that have been 
deleted are IA-1, IA-2, IA-7, IC-5 
and IC-G. IA-1 and IA-2, the wax- 
dipped packages, have proven to he 
quite- expensive to fabricate as they 
require a good deal of manual labor. 
There has been no question as to 
the effectiveness of these packages; 
but, aside from being costly, the pro- 
tection they afford is duplicated by 
the IA-8 and the lA-lfi. The IA-7, 
vacuum pack, is now designated as an 
optional variant of the IA-5, the all- 
metal sealed container, 

The submethod I C-5 package, a 
water-resistant fiberboard box, sealed, 
has _ been redesignnted as a method 
I {if a preservative has been used 
on the item) or a method III (if no 
contact preservative has been used). 

Submethod IC-0 has not been 
proven any more effective than the 
IC-1, the IC-3 or the IA-8, any 
of which would be acceptable sub- 
stitutes. 

The two added submethods, IC-7 
and IC-8, are especially adaptable 
to the packaging of bearings and 
other small critical parts. 

Submethod IC-7 consists of a com- 
partmented heat sealed plastic pack- 
age made of a rigid cellulose ace- 
tate, cellulose acetate butyrate, or 
cellulose propionato. Each compart- 
ment holds one item which has been 
dipped in preservative oil. The com- 
partments arc separated by score 
lines, making it an easy matter to 
break off one compartment while 
leaving the remainder intact. 

The IC-8 is designed for the plastic 
packaging of larger items of reg- 
ular shape. A plastic cup is formed. 



again using one of the materials 
specified for the IC-7 above, which 
allows a minimum clearance for the 
item. The item, dipped into a pre- 
servative oil, is placed in the cup; 
and a telescoping cup is formed to 
close the package. The seam is chem- 
ically sealed by the use of a plastic 
solvent. 

This change does not reflect the only 
use of plastics in packaging that oc- 
curs in MIL-P-11QE. Polyethylene 
film (L-P-378) and types I, IT, and 
III of MI L-F-221 1, transparent 
packaging film, are included in many 
of the submethods as acceptable sub- 
stitutes for the opaque packaging 
materials that have been specified in 
the past. 

The advantages of transparent 
plastic packaging have been recog- 
nized by industry for many years. In 
the- past few years some; military 
contracts have specified the use of 
plastic bags and wraps, and some of 
the military organizations have used 
them extensively. 

With the development of the water- 
vaporproof, greaseproof film that 
complies with the requirements for 
type I of MIL-P-22191, it is now 
possible to use transparent plastic 
films over the whole spectrum of pro- 
tection from method III, which is de- 
signed for mechanical and physical 
protection only, to the highly watcr- 
vaporproof desiccated package- of 
method II. Films conforming to types 
II and III of this specification afford 
moderately water- vaporproof and 
greaseproof protection (type II) and 
waterproof (type III). 
t Although types I and II are rela- 
tively expensive, they will find many 
uses where transparency and reduc- 
tion of tare weight are factors. While 
inspection requirements have not been 
drastically changed, users of MIL-P- 
UG will find that the specific tests are 
no longer detailed in the specification 
but are included by reference to the 
appropriate tests of Federal Teat 
Method Standard No. 101. This is in 
keeping with the Department of De- 
fense. Standardization Program which 
requires that detailed information 
will not be duplicated from document 
to document. 

Procurement personnel, packaging 
engineers and packagers will find that 
MIL P-lltiE is a much broader speci- 
fication than its predecessors and is 
a forward pointing sign post along the 
road to better, less costly packaging, 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



19 



Military Exports 

(Continued from Page 7) 

maintain a reasonable stability 
through balance of forces as they arc 
n. problem of considering the effects 
of over $750 million in arms poured 
into Egypt by the Soviets through 
IB 84. 

Problems from a Protectionist Point 
of View. 

Finally, I would like to cover the 
problem of military exports in terms 
of world affairs by examining a 
problem which manifests itself in 
Europe and, particularly, in the con- 
sideration of the U. K. aerospace in- 
dustry. I suppose we could say that 
no one objected about military ex- 
ports (.Luring the 1950's when the 
foreign assistance program was pay- 
ing for it and, therefore, no one can 
properly object to such exports now. 
However, there are always people 
who view their pi-oblems from a pro- 
tectionist point of view. We know 
such men exist here and they also 
exist in Europe. 

We would not wish to react to 
these protectionist interests in Eu- 
rope from a narrow view of our own. 
The result would certainly be coun- 
ter productive to oiu 1 own military 
export efforts and would make it in- 
creasingly difficult for defense minis- 
ters interested in increasing defense 
return for economic investment to 
buy from the United States. We have 
much broader interests interests 
which will require the U, S. response 
and approach to be as ingenious as it 
is vigorous. We must .establish by our 
actions in Government and industry 
that there is merit in 'an orientation 
towards the United States. We must 
sell the benefits of collaboration in 
defense matters with competition. 
We must demonstrate that the free 
world has more to gain from the 
U. S. model of defense competition 
than it has from the temptation to 
allocate the market and build little, 
safe, high-cost arrangements across 
national borders. 

These are problems that we must 
all work on problems that we have 
not resolved, problems which the 
policy management of our Govern- 
ment and our industry must consider. 
A recent UK aircraft industry re- 
port is indicative of the frustrations 
and consequent protectionism that is 
arising in Europe. I would like to 
cite some of the more significant ele- 



ments of that report which exem- 
plify the problem: 

e After dealing with the character 
of the aerospace industry as one in- 
volving heavy investments of re- 
search and development and tremen- 
dously .expensive products in terms of 
the past, the UK report states (a) 
that the U. S. aircraft industry out- 
put per man is estimated at three 
to three and a half times that of the 
United Kingdom; (b) that the U. S. 
pay is two and a half times that of 
the United Kingdom; and (c) that the 
U. S. worker has three to three and 
a half times as much fixed assets 
supporting him as the UK worker. 

o After continuing an examination 
of relative production runs between 
the United States and the United 
Kingdom, the UK report notes that 
the United States buys 75 percent of 
free world military and space pro- 
duction and 50 percent of the free 
world civilian production, that the 
United Kingdom buys one-twelfth as 
much as the United States, and that 
the United Kingdom plus the com- 
mon market buys one-fourth as much 
as the United States. 

o The UK report notes the major 
factor in the success of the U. S. 
foreign sales program is early de- 
livery U. S, delivery generally re- 
duces development by one year rela- 
tive to that of the United Kingdom. 
They note lack of productivity in 
their industry, excessive delay in de- 
livery, insufficient export promotion, 
inadequate market research and gen- 
eral governmental obstacles as the 
reasons for their difficulties although 
they have just pointed out that they 
sell more abroad than does the United 
States. 

A leading American manufacturer 
was with me recently in London and, 
in speaking to some key representa- 
tives of the United Kingdom, heard 
this intonement of fear against the 
American aerospace industry. He told 
me that up until that moment he just 
had never oven thought about an 
American industry competing with a 
UK industry. He said that he spent 
all his time figuring out ways and 
means to compete with the Boeing's, 
the Douglas's, the Lockheed's, the 
North American's, the General Dy- 
namics's and the McDonnell's. He said 
to our British friends that, if they 
really wanted to do business in the 
aerospace world, they had better 



start worrying about the specifics of 
competing with companies, since 
there was no American aerospace in- 
dustry with which they were compet- 
ing. 

This is only the surface of the 
problem. The UK aircraft report did 
go far enough to make an analysis 
of the net tariff rate that was being 
applied by the following protection- 
ist lines. The report noted: 

On the basis of an animal devel- 
opment investment of 100 million 
pounds and an annual aircraft 
production of 320 million pounds, 
and assuming a U. S. production 
cost 90 percent that of the United 
Kingdom, the United Kingdom 
could have acquired 420 million 
pounds of production from the 
United States at a production cost 
of 288 million pounds and a de- 
velopment cost of 33 million 
pounds. This cheaper U. S. alter- 
native is equivalent to a tariff of 
99 million pounds, or just over 30 
percent. If U. S. production cost 
is assumed to be 80 percent of 
UK production cost, the equiva- 
lent "tariff" is $7.56. These tariffs 
are probably understated since the 
United States sells abroad its 
more successful aircraft which 
have longer production runs and 
higher learning-curve savings, 
e.g., the Phantom run is about 
nine times that of the Lightning. 
The committee concludes that the 
UK aircraft industry has been 
subsidized too much; there are 
very few modern tariffs higher 
than 15 percent. Domestic produc- 
tion of the TSR-2, which would 
have cost $15.4 million each, or 
more than twice that of the 
F-lll, would have reflected a 
tariff of more than 100 percent, 

Even with this advanced view oi 
the situation, the report conclude! 
that cooperation with the Unitec 
States is ruled out for the following 
reasons : 

The United States has no neec 
for cooperation since the U. S. air 
craft industry would be able to mec 
all requirements. 

The United States is not likel; 
to even buy UK aircraft as a quit 
pro quo for UK purchases, 

If this type of reasoning were aj> 
plied to all industries and companies 
the conclusions would be disastrou; 
for the United Kingdom. Neither o 



20 



June 196( 



these conclusions reflect the recogni- 
_ tion for competition as a social need 
competition with the best, .not with 
the second best, to improve the po- 
tential of any industry. Even the 
second conclusion on the UK likeli- 
hood of U. S. buying UK aircraft 
does not reflect the desire to ask for 
competition with the United States, 
but merely says there will not be 
enough quid pro quo allocation of the 
market. 

What do we do about this situa- 
tion and where do we go from here? 
T do not profess to know all the an- 
swers and the Government has not 
I adopted a specific solution or has not 
identified any specific remedy to the 
problem. We have too much at stake 
in terms of our military export rela- 
tions to world affairs to stick our 
head in the sand like an ostrich and, 
to use an old cliche, we know we must 
adopt a position of enlightened self- 
interest. 

First, we have centered our con- 
cept on a competitive economy sys- 
tem similar to our own and similar to 
the concept inherent in any common 
defense market. Such a system would 
| strive for the development of inter- 
national relations between ourselves 
and certainly with nations who have 
placed such extensive dependence on 
American industry based on these 
principles : 

The development of an efficient, 
lowest possible cost, highest possible 
quality defense industry. 

Minimum barriers to the free 
flow of capital, technology, skills and 
pi-oducts for the defense industries 
within the free world. 

Development of an effective spe- 
cialization with the result that the 
defense producers in each country 
apply themselves to those areas of 
fabrication in which they have the 
greatest capable efficiency. 

Exploitation of the "economy of 
scale" first on a selective basis and 
then in broader ways. 

Development of a network of in- 
dustry-to-industry relationships and 
technical associations. 

Secondly, we believe the job of 
Government is to try to maintain the 
proper policy environment for such 
competition by industry; to move 
ahead in specific selective projects 
with industry in the next few years 
to test out the operating principles. 
A common defense market after all 



in its purest form probably does not 
exist anywhere in the world. A com- 
mon defense market in practical liv- 
ing form, however, is the process of 
striving 1 to increase the flow of tech- 
nology, capital, labor and production 
across borders with minimum inter- 
ference for the specific purpose of 
improving the product returned for 
the effort expended. 

Such action will tend to support the 
most efficient producers and not sup- 
port all of the independently sub- 
sidized producers in separate coun- 
tries. It will not be surprising, 
therefore, to see some allied indus- 
tries, barely maintaining themselves 
on a highly subsidized basis, opposed 
to the idea of a common defense 
market. I do not think these people 
arc to be criticized for we, too, from 
time to time as this matter develops 
will have to consider carefully the 
necessary position of our own indus- 
tries. 

However, on balance it is my opin- 
ion, derived through extensive discus- 
sions with U. S. manufacturers, that 
the highly competitive approach that 
has been taken here in the United 
States, particularly as a, result of 
Secretary McNamara's coat reduction 
program, places the U. S. industries 
in fit condition for competition 
throughout the world. The large buy- 
ing of defense production by our 
allies in the United 1 States has proved 
this point. In spite of what one may 
hear from time to time, this buying- 
has been the result, not of super 
salesmen, but of an increasing num- 
ber of super buyers throughout the 
world. Governments have increas- 
ingly insisted on purchasing defense 
materials at the lowest possible coat 
and, thereby, saving- literally billions 
of dollars for their taxpayers. 

With these kinds of defense ob- 
jectives in mind, we are prepared to 
proceed pragmatically on the defense 
common market with these super 
buyers. In examining our actions and 
policies, we have made it clear that 
no policy adopted by us will have 
support or foreign credence unless it 
is rooted in our own self interest. 
We have also recognized that self in- 
tei-est does not require that it be 
solely profitable to this country and 
be a one-way street. In fact, our very 
successful defense export prog-rams 
will be increasingly counter produc- 
tive without the acceptance of the 
same concept of free flow of trade 



which dominates international com- 
mercial markets. The common defense 
market idea is simply a recognition 
of this fact and proposes an enlight- 
ened method of its implementation. In 
the specific case of the United King- 
dom we have recently agreed to con- 
sider the procurement of British 
equipment for U, Si. defense forces 
in ail amount of about $300 million. 
Such procurement, however, will be 
carried out in competition with U. S. 
sources so that the United States will 
buy from the United Kingdom only 
when the UK item is competitive in 
cost and quality. 

Thus, in this way DOD believes it 
is in the interest of the free world 
to develop a gradual case-by-caso pat- 
tern of a defense common market. 
Looking at a long-range aspect, I see 
no reason to change my earlier esti- 
mates which were: 

First, in the next 10 years I 
expect that our allies may purchase 
a minimum of $10 to $15 billion of 
their requirements from the United 
States by sheer virtue of the fact 
that defense common market princi- 
ples will be operative among the lead- 
ing purchasing defense ministries 
whether we have a formal market or 
not. 

Second, I expect in the next 10 
years that some $5-$10 billion of com- 
bined U, S. and allied requirements 
may he handled through international 
production and development pro- 
grams, While this amount is small 
compared to the $200 billion which 
the United States will be spending 
during that period, or the total of 
$100 billion spent by other free world 
countries, it is an amount which will 
be the largest total of common pro- 
duction and development that has 
ever occurred in the history of the 
world. 

Third, proceeding in these prac- 
tical ways to resolve our problems, 
we and our allies will place in posi- 
tion for the 1980's. a new breed of 
industry engineer-diplomat practiced 
in the tasks of using the defense com- 
mon market approach to harmonize 
allied military requirements and pro- 
duction to an extent not ever seen be- 
fore in the field of vehicles, armor, 
missiles, aircraft and electronics. 

I hope this information will be 
helpful and that industry will find 
many more ways and means than I 
have described to participate in world 
affairs through military exports. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



21 



1331 

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 

!! jj g 51 1 % 8 

25 27 28 29 30 



12 

'3456739 

; 10 n n 13 u is ie 

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 
I 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 

31 



S Hi " t W T F S 

12 34 5 6 

7 8 9 10 II 12 13 

14 15 16 '17 IB 19 20 

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 
28 29 30 31 




SPEAKERS CALENDAR 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Ailm. Alfred 0. Ward, USN, U. S, 
Representative to NATO Standing 
Group and Military Committee, at In- 
dependence Day Celebration, Birming- 
ham, Ala,, July 4. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Gen. Harold K. Johnson, Army 
Chief of Staff, at Jaycee Prayer 
Breakfast. Detroit, Mich., June 29. 

Gen. Frank S. Besson, Jr., Com- 
manding General, Army Materiel 
Command, at ceremony marking pro- 
duction of first XM551 General Sheri- 
dan Vehicle, Army Tank Automotive 
Plant, Cleveland, Ohio, June 29. _ 

Maj. Gen. W. J. Sutton Chief, 
Army Reserve, at Reserve Officers 
Assn. National Convention, New York 
City, June 29. , ^. L . 

Mai. Gen. B. F. Taylor, Director of 
Army Budget, Office of the Comp- 
troller of the Army, at Army Comp- 
trollership School, Syracuse Univer- 
sity, June 29. 

Lt. Gen, Robert Hackett, Comp- 
troller of the Army, at Army Comp- 
trollership School, Syracuse Univer- 
sity, July 1. 



Brig. Gen. Andrew P. Rollins, Asst. 

to the Chief of Engineers for NASA 

Support, at Society of Professional 

Engineers meeting, Corpus Christi, 

.Tex., July 1. nt ., 

William P. Durkee. Director of Civil 
Defense, at Governors' Conference, 
Los Angeles, Calif., July 4-7. 

Brig. Gen. Harry G. Woodbury, 
Dep. Dir. of Civil Works, Office, Chief 
of Engineers, at Southern Water Re- 
sources Conference, Houston, Tex., 
July 18. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

RAdm. E. E. Christcnsen, Dcp. 

Commander for Plans and Program, 
Air Systems Command, at Design for 
Maintainability Conference, Statler 
Hilton Hotel, New York, N. Y. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Maj. Gen. M. C. Demlcr, Comman- 
der, Research & Technology Div., Air 
Force Systems Command, at Space & 
Ballistic Missile Technical Sympo- 
sium, Air Force Academy, Colo., July 
6-8. 



Maj. Gen. B. I. Funk, Commander, 
Ballistic Systems Div., Air Force Sys- 
tems Command, at Space & Ballistic 
Missile Technical Symposium, Air 
Force Academy, Colo., July fi-B; at 
British United Services meeting, Los 
Angeles, Calif., July IB. 

Gen. B. A. Schriever, Commander, 
Air Force Systems Command, at Ten- 
nessee Space Institute, Arnold Ail- 
Force Station, Tenn., July 11. 

Maj. Gen. J. J. Cody, Dcp. Chief of 
Staff, Systems, Air Force Systems 
Command, at Society of American 
Military Engineers, Vandenberff AFH, 
Calif., July 19; at Photo-Optical En- 
gineers Institute, St. Louis, Mo., Aug. 
22. 

Lt. Gen. W. A. Davis, Vice Com- 
mander, Air Force Systems Command, 
at Atlantic Research Conference, 
Costa Mesa, Calif., July 29. 

Maj. Gen. H. J. Sands, Jr., Com- 
mander, Ballistics Systems Div., Air 
Force Systems Command, nt Altantic 

Research Conference, Costa Mesti, 
Calif., July 29. 

Gen. II. M. Estes, Jr., Commander, 
Military Airlift Command, at National 
Defense Transportation Assn, meet- 
ing, Atlanta, Ga., Aug. 11. 



Main Battle Tank Program Enters New Phase 



The joint United States/ Federal Re- 
public of German (FRG) Main Battle 
Tank program will enter a new phase 
with the building of pilot models and 
testing. The management of this 
phase will shift from the Keller & 
Knappich plant in Augsburg, Ger- 
many to the General Motors Tech- 
nical ' Center, Warren, Mich. U. S. 
prototypes will be built at the Army 
Tank Plant in Cleveland, Ohio, and 
an equal number of FRG prototypes 
will be built in Germany. 

Start of the new phase marks a 
milestone achieved in the unique two- 
nation tank development program, 
which was initiated under an agree- 
ment between officials of the United 
States and Germany in August 1963. 

The agreement created an interna- 
tional two-man Program Management 
Board to execute a joint effort to de- 
sign a single tank, producible in either 
country. Major General W. G, Dolvin, 
USA, was appointed the U. S. member 
and Dr. Fritz Engleniann. the German 
member. 

The board is now preparing plans 
for advance production engineering 
of the final model. All costs are 
shared on a fifty-fifty basis. 

To assist in executing the agree- 



ment, the Program Management 
Board first retained the services of 
Lockheed Missile & Space Co. to run 
a Parametric Design/ Cost Effective- 
ness Study and created a Joint Engi- 
neering Agency (JEA) composed of 
Government personnel to break out 
and then review design tasks, guided 
by input from the Lockheed study, 

Concurrently, each nation selected 
a civilian industrial firm as its engi- 
neering assistance contractor. The 
United States selected the General 
Motors Corp.; the FRG, the German 
Development Corp. Personnel from 
these contractors composed a joint 
design team. 

Working closely together in this 
organizational frame, American and 
German experts have overcome lin- 
guistic and .technical differences in 
reaching agreement on "one" tank as 
called for in the basic agreement. Not 
only has a mutually agreeable design 
been established but remaining devel- 
opment workloads have been defined 
and assigned to the nation responsible 
for execution. 

The United States, for example, will 
furnish 'a new high horsepower multi- 
fueled engine; incorporate its Shil- 
lelagh missile system into a newly de- 



signed Primary Armament Systran ; 
and submit a new type suspension sys- 
tem for final selection by the Program 
Management Board. 

The Federal Republic oC Germany 
will furnish a uniquely designed 
transmission capable of handling tho 
horsepower output promised by the 
American engine; will continue de- 
velopment of n more conventional 
high horsepower engine as a backup; 
and will submit a new typo suspen- 
sion system also for final .selection by 
the Program Management Board. 

Since the new Main Battle Tank for 
the 1970's will be expected to fight 
and survive on a nuclear battle field, 
many details concerning the project 
remain classified. But no single task 
now appears to be unsolvable with the 
result that progress of the US/FUG 
cooperative tank development pro- 
gram is forging ahead. 

With its success, increased interest 
from other NATO nations is expected. 
The Program Management Board has 
briefed many friendly nations to date 
and expects the benefits of coopera- 
tive development will be shared by 
others beside the United States and 
Germany. 



22 



June 1966 



NOTES FOR EDITORS 



Briefed below are some events 
and projects within the Depart- 
ment of Defense which may be of 
interest to writers and editors. If 
further information on any of these 
topics is desired, please write to 
Chief, Magazine and Book Branch, 
Office of Assistant Secretary of De- 
fense (Public Affairs), Washing- 
ton, B.C., 20301 



NAVY STUDIES HOMING 

PIGEONS FOR HINTS 

ON NAVIGATION 

Navy scientists are taking an in- 
creased interest in the uncanny abil- 
ity of homing pigeons to find their 
way hack to their nests over un- 
familiar terrain. 

Knowledge gained from experi- 
ments now being conducted with the 
birds could lead to new concepts in 
miniature navigation and detection 
systems. 

To study the phenomenon, the Navy 
is tracking the birds with a miniature 
radio beacon transmitter strapped to 
the pigeon's back. In tracking the 
pigeon, two receiving stations are set 
up at different locations along the 
bird's probable flight path. When the 
instrumented bird is released, the two 
stations begin to record information 
on the bird's flight behavior. 

The transmitter, which weighs less 
than two ounces including power sup- 
ply, has an output of one thousandth 
of a watt. 

It is hoped that investigations will 
provide information which will enable 
scientists to clarify various hy- 
potheses concerning those factors 
affecting the homing instinct. 



NAVY TESTS 
FLIGHT DECK COATING 

The U.S. Navy is testing a new 
flight deck surfacing compound on its 
aircraft carriers called poly urethane. 
Tests show that the new product lasts 
three to four times longer than sur- 
facing now in use. Because poly 
urethane bonds well with wood and 
steel, the Navy hopes to use the com- 
pound as a preservative of the wood 
on anti-submarine aircraft carrier 
flight decks. Crushed quartz sand 
added to the compound makes it an 
affective non-skid surface. 



NEW OIL ANALYSIS SYSTEM 

NO LONGER REQUIRES 

LABORATORY FACILITIES 

Engine oil analysis to detect air- 
craft engine wear is about to come out 
of the laboratory and move into the 
maintenance hangar. Using a small 
analyzer now under development, the 
Air Force will be able to detect the 
amount of submicroscopic metal par- 
ticles in oil which indicate aircraft 
engine wear without the controlled 
laboratory conditions that are now 
necessary. 

The technique of analyzing engine 
oil to measure wear is not new, but its 
application to gas turbine engines is 
comparatively recent. With the new 
analyzer, engine oil samples extracted 
periodically from engine oil systems 
are examined for metallic contamina- 
tion by spectrometric analysis. In this 
technique, the oil specimen is vapor- 
ized by heat, and its light output sepa- 
rated by wave lengths. Spectral light 
then passes through exit slots posi- 
tioned in the focal curve to obtain 
wave lengths of the various metals in 
the oil sample. Different metals show 
up in different colors in the spectrum. 



NAVY ADOPTS NEW 

STEREOSCOPIC SYSTEM IN 

UNDERWATER EXPLORATION 

Navy oceanographers are now us- 
ing a cable-lowered information ga- 
thering stereoscopic system which 
includes twin cameras for taking 
stereo photos, a coring device, cur- 
rent velocities and direction record- 
ing instruments, sediment samplers, 
water samplers and a temperature 
profiler, in their studies of the sea. 

Watertight cases enclose the cam- 
eras and power supply which, with 
the system instrumentation, are 
mounted in a skid-like frame. The 
complete unit weighs less than 500 
pounds in sea water and is pressure 
resistant to depths of over 36,000 
feet. Special tripping mechanisms 
and a preset programming device 
operate the cameras, strobe lights 
and other equipment in proper se- 
quence. A sonar transducer mounted 
on the frame is used to position the 
system at any specified target height 
from the bottom, 




To study the homing ability of pigeons, the Navy has developed a miniatu 
transmitting system which is strapped to the bird's back during flight. T 
instrument records changes in the environment as well as the bird's physioloj 
cal reactions. Attached as shown in the model, the tracking: transmitter con 
he helpful in answering the question of how homing pigeons arc able 
navigate. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



July 5-9: American College Public 
Relations Assn. Meeting, Boston, 
Mass. 

July 11-15: National Conference of 
Weights & Measures, Denver, Colo. 
July 16-19: National Audio-Visual 
Asan. Meeting, Washington, D.C, 

July 19-23: National Tool. Die and 
Precision Machining Assn. Meeting, 
Hot Springs, Va. 

Aug. 7-12: Professional Photogra- 
phers of America Meeting, Chicago, 
111. 

Aug. 8-11: Society of Automotive 
Engineers Meeting, Los Angeles, 
Calif. 

Aug. 17-19: Joint Automatic Control 
Conference, Seattle. Wash. 

Aug. 19-26: VFW National Conven- 
tion, New York City. 

Aug. 22-Sept. 10: Science Congress, 
Tokyo, Japan. 

Aug. 26-Sopt. 1: American Legion 
National Convention, Washington, 
D.C. 

Sept. 11-16: American Chemical So- 
ciety Meeting* New York City. 

Sept. 18-21: American Institute of 
Chemical Engineers Meeting, At- 
lantic City, N.J. 

Sept. 18-22: American Society for In- 
dustrial Security Meeting, Philadel- 
phia, Pa. 

Sept. 21: International Atomic Energy 
Agency Meeting, Vienna, Austria. 



Sent. 27-30: American Roentgen Ray 
Society Meeting, San Francisco, 

Calif. , . 

Oct. 3-5: Aerospace & Electronic Sys- 
tems Convention, Washington. D.C. 

Oct. 4-6: American Oil Chemists So- 
ciety Meeting, Philadelphia, Pa. 

Oct. 5-7: International Association of 
Electrical League, Scottsdale, Ariz. 

Oct. G: NSIA Maintenance Advisory 
and Procurement Advisory Com- 
mittee Meetings, Washington, D.C. 

Oct. 7: Society of American Military 
Engineers Meeting, St. Paul, Mum. 

Oct. 51-12: National Defense Trans- 
portation Assn. Meeting, Dallas, 

Tex. , . , . , 

Oct. 9-14: Electrochemical Society 

Meeting, Philadelphia, Pa. 
Oct. 10-12: Assn. of the U.S. Army 

Meeting, Washington, D.C. 
Oct. 17-21: American Society of Civil 

Engineers Meeting, Philadelphia, 

Pa. 

Oct. 18-20: American Society of Me- 
chanical Engineers Meeting. Min- 
neapolis, Minn. . 

Oct. 19-21: Institute of Electric & 
Electronic Engineers Meeting, Bos- 
ton, Mass. 

Oct. 26-29: Second International Con- 
gress on Air Technology, Hot 
Springs, Ark. 

Oct. 31-Nov. 2: Defense Supply Assn. 
Meeting, Philadelphia, Pa. 



USAF Electronics 

Briefing for Industry 

Postponed 

The Air Force has postponed the 
classified advanced planning briefing 
for industry on electronic systems 
which was scheduled to bo held in 
Boston, Mass., June 28-30 (Defense 
Industry Bulletin, May 1966, page 
10,). 

The briefing, sponsored by the Air 
Force Systems Command's Elec- 
tronic Systems Division and the Na- 
tional Security Industrial Associa- 
tion, is now being planned for the 
fall on a date to be announced. 

Postponement action was in accord 
with Air Force policy to assure full 
support for operations in Southeast 
Asia by canceling or postponing cer- 
tain activities not absolutely essen- 
tial and related to operational re- 
quirements. 



USAF Selects Contractor To Develop 
Research Vehicle for Project PILOT 



The U. S. Air Force has selected 
the Martin Co. to develop a manned, 
lifting bo'cly vehicle a revolutionary 
rocket plane without wings to ex- 
ptore the atmospheric maneuverabil- 
ity of future spacecraft. 

The new research vehicle, desig- 
nated the SV-BP, will be built for 
the Air Force Systems Commands 
Aeronautical Systems Division as 
part of the PILOT (Piloted Low 
Speed Test) Project. 

Powered by a rocket engine, it 
will cany one man and be used to 
learn more about the flight charac- 
teristics and maneuverability of 
wingless lifting bodies from super- 
sonic speeds of approximately mach 
2 (more than 1,000 miles an hour) 
down to landing at normal jet-fight- 
er speeds of between 120 and 160 
miles an hour. . 

Initially, the SV-5P will be carried 
aloft under the wing of a B-52 air- 
craft and will be dropped for power- 
less, gliding nights landing at Ed- 
wards AFB, Calif. In later powered 
tests, the lifting body will be dropped 

24 



from the B-52 and then will rocket to 
Mach 2 speed at about 100,000 feet 
altitude from where it will maneuver 
to a landing at Edwards. 

The SV-5 shape looks like a bulbous 
wedge, curving on the top, flat on the 
bottom with angled vertical fins. The 
aerodynamic shape of this research 
aircraft is the result of many hours 
of wind tunnel testing and aerody- 
namics analysis by Martin and the 
Air Force over the past seven years. 
The PILOT Project is. part of the 
Air Force's Spacecraft Technology 
and Advanced Reentry Test 
(START) Program. Also in the 
overall program is an unmanned ver- 
sion of the SV-5 which will be boost- 
ed to orbital altitude and hypersonic 
speed from where it will perform 
maneuvering reentry through the 
earth's atmosphere to a recovery in- 
itiation at approximately Mach 2, 

Flight testing of the manned SV- 
5P will be conducted by a joint Air 
Force-NASA test team at Edwar'ds 
AFB, 



Lift-Cruise Engine 
Contracts Awarded 

The U. S. Air Force has awarded 
contracts totaling $41,750,000 to three 
engine manufacturers for develop- 
ment of a vectored- thrust cruise pro- 
pulsion system (lift-cruise engine). 

The three contractors arc General 
Electric, Evcndalo, Ohio; Pratt & 
Whitney, East Hartford, Conn.; and 
the Wright Aeronautical Division, 
Cui'tisa- Wright Corp., Wood-Ridge, 
N. J. Tho companies will perform 
their work under contract to the 
Aero Propulsion Laboratory (APL) 
of the Air Force Systems Command's 
Research and Technology Division. 

In Phase I of the program cadi 
company will build a lift-cruise en- 
gine to demonstrate engineering tech- 
nology. In Phase II one or more con- 
tractors will be selected to build a 
lift-cruise engine to size and for a 
specific application. The Air Force 
expects the program to advance tho 
engine thrust-to -weight ratio con- 
siderably. Present engines develop a 
thrust- to- weight ratio of about four 
to one. ( 

The program is managed by Major 
E. A. Johnson of APL's Turbine En- 
gine Division, Ralph L, Apel is the 
Air Force project engineer. 

The lift-cruise engine developed \\\\~ 
der this program will be applicable 
to V/STOL and other aircraft sys- 
tems. Contractors were given the go- 
ahead on the 15-month program Jan. 
1, 1966. 

June 1966 




DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



Contracts of $1,000,000 and over 
awarded during the month 'of May 
1966: 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

2 U.S. Deciding Co., St. Paul. Minn. $1,933,- 
080. 70,000 Btcel bunk beds and 160,000 
adapters. St. Paul. Defense General Sup- 
lily Center, Richmond, Ya. 

Ccsco Container Mfar, Corp., Northampton, 
Mass. S1.12B.41G, 92,046 plywood locker 
trunks. Northampton. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 
4 Oscar Mayer & Co., Madison, Wls. 81,- 
153,820. 490,0(18 cans of pre-fded sliced 
bacon. MiidlHon. Defense Personnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia. 

Knyser Roth Corn., Colonial Div., Wood- 
buvy, Tenn. 1,660,080. 807,744 men's blue 
chambray shifts. Woodbury. Defense Per- 
Honnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 

lltCBcl Textile Corp., New York City. $5,- 
37G.GOO. 8,401,251 ynrrta of cotton snteen 
cloth. New York City. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 

I). G. Colton, New York City. $1,015,335. 
076,272 yards of cotton duck cloth. New 
York City. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelpln. 

Putnam Milla, New York City, $2,200,616. 
2,380,130 yards of cotton duck cloth. New 
York City. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

G Bowling ling Co., Valdostii, Oa. $1,306,000. 
Six million Handbags. Defense General 
Supply Center, Richmond, Va. 

Cavalier Hag Co., Lumber ton, N.C. SI,- 
C7S.804. Seven million sandbags, Defense 
General Supply Center, Richmond, Va. 
9 Smith, Kline & French Laboratories, Phila- 
delphia. SI. 120, 167. 78,360 bottles of 
chlorphcn Irani i no mnleate, phenylpropano- 
lamine hydrochclorlde and inopropamldo 
iodine capsules. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia, 

11 Pettibone Mullikcn Corp., WaahlnRton, D.C. 
$1,440,200. 70 diesel fork lift trucks. Do- 
fense General Supply Confer, Hichmond, 
Va. 

Oscar Mayer & Co., Madison, Wis. 51.816,- 
131. S,l)70,81<! five and one-half-ounce cans 
of sliced pork. DefcnHC Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

Oscar Mayer & Co., Madison, Wls. $1,313,- 
34G. 8,E70,810 five and one-hnlf-ounce cans 
of sliced ham. Defense Pernonncl Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

12 West Polnt-Popperell, Inc., New York 
City. $1,210,046. 1,210,170 linear ynnla of 
cotton duck cloth. New York City. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 

Mt, Vcrnon Mills, Baltimore, Md. $1,237,- 
430. 1,230,130 linear yards of cotton duck' 
cloth. Baltimore. Defense Personnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia. 

Presto*, Inc., Now York City. $1,930,781. 
1,607,480 linear yards of cotton duck cloth, 
New York City. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

13 Burlington Industries, Pacific Mills Dlv.. 
New York City. $3,660,460. 1,480,000 
linear yards of polyester fiber and wool 
tropical cloth. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

The Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alex- 
andria, Va., has awarded the following 
contracts for grade 115/145 aviation gas: 
Humble Oil & Refining Co., Houston, 
Tex. $11,021,820. 77,335,000 gals. 
Socony Mobil Oil Co,, New York City. 
$10,881,413. 78,650,000 gals. 
Rlchfleld Oil Corp., Los Angeles. $0,800,- 
3GQ. 05,100,000 gala. 



Contract Legend 

Contract information is listed In the follow- 
ing sequence; Date Company Value 
Material or Work to be Performed Loca- 
tion Work Performed Contractina Agency. 



Cities Service Oil Co., Now York City. 

$7,880.854. B8,800,000 gals. 

Tidewater Oil Co.. New York City. 86,- 

338,830. 4G,032,000 pals. 

Standard Oil Co. of Calif., San Fran- 
cisco. 55,846,127. 40,278,000 gals. 

Standard OH Co., Louisville, Ky. S5,7S3,- 

fJ82. 43.034,928 gain. 

American Oil Co., Chicago. $4,691,432. 

31,231,000 guls. 

Phillips Petroleum Co., Bartlesville, Okln. 

54,521,001. 34,240,000 Bain. 

Sinclair Refining Co., New York City. 

S3.333.9GO. 25,200.000 gals, 

Continental Oil Co., Houston, Tex. $2.- 

004,033. 15,852,500 Rate. 

Union Oil Co. of Calif., Los Angeles. 

1,760,608. 11,608,000 eals. 

Shamrock Oil & Gas Corn., Amnrillo, 

Tex. $1,391,003. 10.5GO.OOO gain. 

LaGloria Oil & fins Co., Houston, Tex. 

81,198,751. 8,772,000 (sals. 

Tidewater OH Co., Loa AIIKC'CH. $1,167,- 

2G4. 7,560,000 Kals. 

1C Bruce Products, Inc., Eatontown, N.J. 
52. 304,000, 200,000 men's lightweight inline 
raincoats. Eaton town. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia.. 
Laura Industries, Inc., Selnin, Ala. $1.- 
253,745. 100,100 men's light weight taupe 
raincoats. Selnm. Defense Personnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia. 

17 Rachcllo Laboratories, LonK Beach, Calif. 
$1,330.094, 767,440 bottles (100 tablets 
each) of tetracyclln-e hydroclilorkle. Lons 
Beach. Defense Perwonnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia. 

Pacific Mills, division of Burlington Indus- 
tries, New York City. $1,800,000. 400,000 
yards of wool serge cloth. Now York City. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, 1'hilfi- 
clelnhia. 

Hnnorn FabricB Co., New York City. $1.- 
595,750. 350,000 yards of wool sorgo cloth. 
New York City. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

J. P. Stevens & Co., New York City. $3,- 
EIO.OOO. 800,000 yarita of wool serge cloth. 
New York City. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

American Oil Co., Chicago, $2,100,081. Fuel 
oil ami uaHollne, Chicago. Defense Fuel 
Supply Center, Alexandria, Vn, 
Socony Mobil Oil Co.. New York City. $!,- 
464,196. Fue-1 oil and Knsoline. Defense 
Fuel Supply Center, Alexandria, Va. 
Tcxnco, Inc., New York City. $1,1S1,725. 
Fuel oil and gnsolino, Now York City. 
Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alexandria, 
Vn. 

18 E to wall Industries, Etowah, Tenn. $1.- 
419,000. 300,000 men's wind resistant 
cotton conts. Etownh. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 
KlnffH Point Industries, Inc., New York 
Oily. $1,048,000. 200.000 men's wind re- 
sistant, cotton coata. New York City. De- 
fense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

19 Rnehman Mfs, Co,, Reacliim, Pa. $3.044,- 
950. 400,000 field type insect burn. Rending. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

UcBal Textile Corp., New York City. $1,- 
241,020. 1,480,000 yards of flro resistant 
cotton oxford cloth. New York City. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

20 Tucker Mfs, Co., Montgomery, Ala. $1,- 
098,428. 1.0aO,77G solid wood tent polea. 
Montgomery. Defeneo Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

Land O'Lnkcs Crcnmerlcs, Inc., Minne- 
apolis, Minn. $1,300,004. 2,730,812 pounds 
of dehydrated! Ice cream mix. Minneapolis. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

asThe Defcnan Fuel Supply Center, Alex- 
andria, Va. hns awarded the followine con- 
tracts for petroleum : 

Texaco Export, Inc., New Yorlt City. 

$9,081,000. 4,800.000 barrels, Navy 

Special. 

Richfield Oil Corp., Loa Angeles. J8,- 

060,080, 300,000 barrels fuel oil. 



Asiatic Petroleum Corp., New York City. 
82,728,000. 1.000,000 boiTela, Nnvy 

Union Oil Co. of Calif., Sun Francisco. 

$1,070,800. 100,001) barrels Knsollne. 

combat Type 1 ; 000,000 barrels Navy 

Special. 

Union Oil Co. of Cnlif., Lou Angeles. 

82,088,100. 100.000 Imrrcls fuel oil, clioael 

marine; 0-14,000 barrels Nnvy Special; 

100,000 bfti-rolB No. G fuel oil. 

Continental Oil Co., Houston, Tex. $1.- 

644,600. 400,000 barrels fuel oil, tHeaet 

marine. 

Socony Mobil Oil. Now York City. Sl.- 

023,120. SGS.OOO barrels Nnvy Special, 

100,000 barrels No. G fuel oil. 
If. I. Garment, ChlciiRO. $1,117,760. 112,112 
wet- weather, coated nylon over nils. Chlcneo. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia, 

AdtHsoii Shoe Corn.. Wynne, Ark, $1,737,- 
9!iB, 1G7.13S mildew resistant aafoty shoca. 
Wynne, Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia. 

24 Clioctnw MfR, Co., Silns, Ala. 51,201,490. 
524,970 men's white trousers, Sitna. De- 
fense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

an Prestos, Inc., New York City. $3,363,2.30. 
4.200,00 yarcla of cotton oxford cloth. New 
York City. Befenat Personnel Support 
Canter. Philadelphia. 

Ulcffcl Textile Corn., Now York City. !1,- 
800,1)46. 1,401,000 yards of cotton oxford 
cloth. New York City. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia, 
-Glen 13-crry Mfg., Inc., Commerce, Ohla. 
$1,814,777. 1,106,000 cotton sateen trouaera. 
Commerce. Defenac Poraonnel Support 
Center, Philnclclpnlii, 

Orthopedic Equipment Co., Hour him, Ind. 
$2,07fi,783. 08.28C folcilnR littora. 52,334,- 
723. 223,810 tent poles. Bouvbon, Defense 
PorBonncl Siipport Conter, Philadetpltia. 
2G Alpha Industries, Kncixvlllc, Tenn, ?1,B03,- 
020. 170,900 mon'H cotton sntccn jacl<el H . 
Knosvlllo. DcfcnBc Personnel Support 
Center, Pliilocleipliln. 

MnirHiiH, Inc., I'lnconninjr, Mloli. $2,148,- 
823. B,!40 tent frame secllona. PlnconiihiB. 
DeferiBC Personnel Support Ccntci 1 , Phllci- 
clclplitn. 

n. F. Gondrlcli, WrUortown, MCIHB. $1,001.- 
322. 1*2,080 pah'H of black cold- wen tiler 
inmilntod boots. Watortmvn. DofenHo Por- 
Fsonntjl Support Canter, T'lillnOelphin. 
EdglneLon Oil FtcffnerlDB, Long neach. 
Cnllf. 1,1 8I>, 800. 4ti-l,000 barrclH of fuel 
oil. Defense Fuel Supply Contor, Alex- 
nndrin, Vu. 

27 Warren Co.. Atlanta, On. Sl,08H,3ft(l. 1,524, 
Blxty-flvo cubic feet, refrigcratora. Allnntn. 
Defense Gcnernl Supply Center, RichmoiicU 
Vn. 

Mcilart Products, Inc., St. Loula. $1,580,- 
383. 118,721 ateel elothinic lockers. St. 
Louis. DcfeiiHo Conovnl Supply Center, 
Richmond, Vn, 

31 U.S. Steel Corp., Washington, D.C. ?!,- 
141,348. 11,904,431 pounds of Kino contort, 
corniRntod steel sheots. Wnahineton, D.O. 
Defense Industrial Supply Con tor, Phila- 
delphia. 

The following six eontriicta for petroleum 
products have been nwnrdcd by the DG- 
fan&a l-'ucl Supply Center, Alexandria, 
Vo: 

fleas Oil & Cliomlcnl Corp,, Perth Am- 

l)oy, N.J. $1,078.2150. 800,000 l>arroln 

iticttel marine fuel oil. 

American Oil Co., ChicaRo. $4,192,831. 

850,000 bnvrels of gasoline. 

ahull Oil, New York Oily. $3,005,220. 

180,000 barrels of combat Baa, Typo I. 

Cities Service Oil Co., New York City. 

?1,5SO,622. 10,800,000 snllona of JP-1 

M fuel. 

Sun Oil Co., Philadelphia, $2,202,000. 

600,000 bnrrela of diesel fuel oil. 

Hens Oil & Chemical Corp., Pcrtli Am- 

boy. N.J. 51,677, B2C. 850,000- bnrrela of 

ille&el fuel oil anil GQ.OOO liai-rola of 

k or os one. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



25 



ARMY 

a-R.K.O. Syatems, Melbourne, F'lfi. Sl,I-i8.(i(M. 
Wiirk on the Solur Vumn Telescope. Snu 
S|iot. N.M. Engineer Dial., Albtiquornne, 
N.M. 

Dorr-Oliver, Inc., Hartow*. Fin. SI, 169,851. 
CaU'.i nn<[ lucks for Ihc Arkansas liivcr 
NaviKatioji Pi-ojwt, Tnjnpit, Fla. EriKinocr 
Dist., Little Hock, Ark. 

mount Construction Co., Montgomery, AIn. 
33,237,611. Work on [he Columbin Lock 
and Dam. Cnlilwcll County, Ln. EriBineer 
Dist.. Vickaburjf, Miss. 

Eugene Luhr & Co., Columbia, III. 81,304,- 
UI3. Work on the VilfnKQ of New Athens. 
KtiBkaskia River, lllinoiH Project. New 
Athena, III. Engineer Dist.. St. Louis. 

Cabot Corp., I'nmiia, Tux. 81,059,265 
( JOnim gun tube forfrinus. Kiiifrsmill, Tex. 
Walcrvltot Arsenal. N.Y. 

United Aircraft, Stratford, Conn, 57,010, 
000. CH 54 helicopters. Stralfurd. Army 
Aviation Materiel Commnnd, St. Louis 

University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis 
81,200.800. OpEi-alion of the Mntbemntics 
Iteaearch Center at the University of 
Wisconsin. Army Kcsoarch Office, Dm-lmm, 

N,C. 

United Aircraft. I'rjitt & Whitney Div 
East Hartford, Conn, S6,03fi,105. CH-5J 
nircraft engines. East Hartford. Army 
Aviation Materiel Commanil, St. Louis 

Llinney & Hope, Inc., Adclison, Tex ?1 . 
048,400. Construction of nitric acid proc- 
CMIIW unita. KinffBuort, Tenn. Engineer 
Uist., Mobile, Ala. 

~^, 1 n I =, n ,^ llll , c , abl0 Iton Ca " Albion, Mich. 
51,^61.162. Heads and metal parts for the 
i.76 rocket. Albion. Ammunition Pro- 
euroment ft Supply A H en C y, Joliet, III. 
3-Southwest Factories, I nc ., Eidel Inter- 
? , ,r 1 D , W " Albunuerque, N.M. $4,124,- 
\ ,,". e !auil(lll l' ""its. Albuquerque. 

Army Mobility Equipment Center St 
Loins. 

"Jt?, 1 ^! 8 / *' atfli ? c c "- New Castle, Pn. S3,- 
681,848. Demolition kits and spare parts. 
New Castle. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Joliet . Ill 

~^7""r h ft ," B ;. C(> - P*tx. Arh. 84.- 
i , , nu . turblne eiKinea and utility 
sets Phoenix -Army Mcriica] Research & 
Development Commnnd, Office of the 
! U v^i"V, nencvnl ' WartLniiton, D.C, 
MI-? C ? rp " St , ratt " r '. Conn. 82,000,000. 
Modification rf the T55-L-7 turbine engine. 

mn H ^T Ar - my AvI " WoB Mnterlel Com- 
mand. St. Louis. 

J-Olin-Matliie.on Chemleal Corp., Enst Alton, 

A ' ( J 'r 3 '^ 8 ; 7 ; 62 , mm mm"iltton. Ensl 
Alton. Irankford Arsenal, Philadelphia. 

~M Uft?^ 1 7??" CO " "'"KfPfrt. Conn. 
>4, 140,760, 7.G2mm nnimiititon. IlridKe- 

-AM nHV a r nkfort L A , r ? enn1 ' Pblla-klphla. 

Arundcl Corp., Baltimore, Md. 81,962,874 
Dredfiinff , ,h e Dalawnro River. New 
SSa y ' ei ' Enffiaeel ' Dl-t., Philn- 

BendU Corp., Baltimore, Mil. 0,386 66* 

,, /7' s n ' , Md - Ammunition PM! 
ciirement & Snpjdy Apency, Joliet, II] 

~ ay lu , m , inum - Inc - Torrnnce, Calif. 
40mm ammunition cases. Tor- 



. 

~lMi yth M n ( ? 0>> L t 'l'8ton, Mass. 37,582,. 
Brhtnl T!' P S rtS fo r . 76 -Pon'l bombs. 
Uristol, Ten, Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply A K ency. JolieL III. & 

~$?lwrM Vl ll >an i\ Co -' Bl il"stoi,, III. 
I1.B10.8BO, Bomb fuzea. DIuominRton Am- 

Juliet, in. " remQnt fi B AgeSc, 
Bcndijc Corp., Daltimroe, Md. $4,500.720 
Bomb fuses. Baltimore. Ammnnit Ion Pro 
nWJf s "ia>ly A Bene y. Joliet, ll 

~?nn iJ R C ,T f ^ r Co " Fort Worth ' T. 81.- 
^C0.4*I6. Hub assemblies for HU-I hel 

ssa fiL Arf " 



I !, i 'V ^ D " Waterloo. Iowa. $3, 
Rehabilitation of the Army Am- 
munition Plant, Sernnton, Pa. Ammuni- 

Jol"et n r r" rCment S Sui "' ly A B en "y, 

? < B iT ltn m C rp -' Wftterhury, Conn. S3.- 
OJM31. Tooling and special test equip- 
ment for artillery fuae production. Wafer- 



liury. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Joltat. 111. 

fi Rexarc, Inc., West Alexandria, Ohio. $1,- 
109,161. Acetylene generating anrt charging 
plants, trailer mounted. West Alexandria. 
Army Mobility Equipment Center, St. 
Louis, 

It. G. LeTournenu, Inc., Longvicw, Tex. 
SI, 075,000, 750-ponnd bomb assemblies, 
Lonjjview. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Joliet, 111, 
Honeywell, Inc., Hopkins, Minn. S2,4EO,- 
000. Bomb fuzes am! mulnl purls. Now 
Brighton, Minn. Ammunition Procure- 
ment & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 
N orris Thcrmndor Corp., Hesse- Eastern 
Diy.. Everett. Mnss. Sl.437.fi6S. Bomb 
unit tube assemblies. Everett. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency. 
Joliet, III. 

A. 0. Smith Corp., ChlcnEo. SG,393,7<iO. 
750-poiin<! bomb metnl parts. Waco, Tox. 
Ammunition Procurement & Hupply 
Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Bulora Watch Co., Jncktion Heights, N.Y. 
84,150.002. ArminK mechanisms for 81 mm 
mortar shells. Jackson Heights. Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joliet, 111. 

Lane Construction Corp., MeHden, Conn. 

$8,103,378, Construction on the Blanchard 

. River Project. Hlanchard, Pn. Engineer 

Dist., Baltimore. Md. 

AVCO Corn-, Richmond, Ind. S],120,1H6. 
Metnl parts for 750-pound bombs. Hich- 
mond. Ammunition Procurement & Sup- 
ply Agency, Joliet, III. 

AVCO Corp., Richmond, Ind. $1,183,908. 
Motnl parts for 760-pound bombs. Rich- 
mond. Ammunition Procurement & Sup- 
ply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

General Motors, Allisnn Div,, Indianapolis, 
S3, 170,105. Transmissions and power 
transfer units. Indianapolis. Army Tank 
Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 
AVCO Corp.. Richmond, Ind. Sl.Bfl8.OS1. 
2.75-inch rocket fuzes. Richmond. Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply AKency, 
Joliet, 111. 

L. T. Industries, Inc., Garland, Tex. S2,- 
057,591. Fin assemblies for 7BO-pnund 
bombs, Garland. Ammunition Procure- 
ment & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111, 
Raytheon Co., Lexington, Mass. $1,G29,- 
417. Metnl ports for bombs. Bristol, Tenn, 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Asency, Joliet, 111. 

Olln Matliioson Chemical Corp., New York 
City. $4,24.4,724, Various propcllant 
chfti'ges antl miscellaneous ammunition. 
Chnrlestown, Ind. Ammunition Procure- 
ment & Supply Agency, Joliet, III. 
Pettibone-ftliilllken Corn-, Chicago, S4,- 
335,660. Hough terrain truck fork lifts. 
Chicane. Army Mobility Equipment Cim- 
ler, St, Louis. 

White Motor Co., Lansing, Mich. $10.003, 
237. 3 H,-ton trucks. Lnnsing. Army Mo- 
bility Commnnd, Warren, Mich. 
LTV Aerospace Corp., Warren, Mich. $10,- 
70ft,569. Advanced production engincerinK 
for the LANCE missile system, Wan-en 
Army Missile Command, Huntsvfllc, Ala 
U.S. Time Corp., Waterbm-y, Conn. S21,- 
647,830. Artillery shell fusses. Wntcr- 
uury; Euclid, Ohio: Bristol, Conn.; Pat- 
terson, N.J.; and Thomaston, Conn. Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency 
Joliet, III. 

Creighlon, Ernst nnd Wallace, Nashville, 
Perm. 39,626,000. Rehabilitation of exist- 
ing TNT production lines. Chattanooga 
lerm. Army Mobile Engineer Diat., Mo- 
bile, Ala. 

10 MoU Construction Co., Tucson, Ariz. ?!,- 
06-M03. Construction of troop housing 
facilities ami tactical equipment shops. 
IJonna Ana Range, N,M. Engineer Dist., 
Albuquerque, N.M. 

Grosehnns & Petersen, Inc., Maryevillo 
Kan, SI, 153,905. Itelocatton of Northern 
Pacific railroad truck. Bismarck. N.D. 
Engineer Dist., Omaha, Nub. 
ne e o neral Elci:trlc ' Schencctady, N.Y. S9 
068,181, Multi-functional array radar 
power plant. Baltimore, Md. Engineer 
Dist., Honolulu, Hawaii. 

~J 1 ?l Carbidc Cor P" New Y >* City. $5.- 
fi7B,127. Radio batteries. Chcmway, NC 
anil Red Oak, Iowa. Army Electronics 
Command, Philadelphia. 

~u5 t J llh T, B 5i''^ Co " Wniisaii, Wis. SI,- 
^47,088, _ Radio batteries. Waiinaii. Army 
Electronics Command, Philadelphia 

~~?i U c r ?S" J^l Co " Fnwport. I- *L- 
416,780. Radio batteries. Preepon. Army 

Electronics Command, Philadelphia, 



12 



N.Y. 



ft 



13 



26 



11 B. John Mfg. Co., New licit din, Conn, f !, 
070, 09G. Gal. 30 imrliinc mnisnElnc nsscm. 
blics. New Hrltnin. SprliiKfk'ld Armory, 
Mass. 

nowen-McLaiinhlln-Hork Corp., York* Ta. 
$1,481,4011. Half-ton trucks. Ynrfr. Arm IT 
Tank Automotive Center, Warren, Mff>.-. 

Ford Motors, Dem-born, Mich, S1,21T,S07. 
Slake and platform truck*. MiliiJUs, ("alif. 
anil Claycomo, Mo. Ai-Jiiy Timk Auto- 
motive Center, Warren. Mich, 

VhincI Corp., Alhainbrn, Calif- 53,276,- 
000. Overhaul and relit of tankers. Beau- 
mont, Tex. Army Mobility Ktniiiintmt 
Center, St. LmilH. 

Hoeing Co., Vertol Div., Morion, I'M. &2.- 
7UG,4ill. Hillary winu (isacinbly for t>-* 
CIl-<!7 alrui-Hft. Morton. Army AviaH-t.a 
Materiel Conimrmd, St. Louis. 

Boeing Co., Vertol Div,, Morion, IV ft.- 
OH!,20. Ti-ansmlHsidn iissembly for C1I iT 
aircraft. Morion. Army AviiiLiini >!*- 
Icriel Command, SI, Luuta, 

BoeiiiR Co., Vertol Div,, Morion, PJI, tl,- 
129.7HH. Ti-imnmisHion for (311-17 alivrafr, 
Morton. Army Aviation Material Cw,- 
mand, Si. Louis. 

LendcraTt, Inc., Dunton, Tex. S2.yM.JEX 
Hcmi-lrailors. lli-aily, Tex. A rmy Tanli 
AnloKiollvQ Ccn tor, Warren, Mfrh. 

Hulova Wutch Co., ,Iackod Ki'lirht 
S1.7H4.708. Rocket fw.cn. Jiickuiu 
Animunition I'roenremonl 
ABonry, Jotittt, 111. 

Chrysler Motors, Dulroit, Sl.lia.M). 
Cm-go li-nnkH. Warren, Mich. Army T*r,t 
Automotive Center, Wilt-run, Mli-li, 
Fontaine Truck Kquipmont ('a., ItlrminK- 
Inun, Ala. ?l,71)H,afi. SornHrnirci.'. 
Ilaleyvillo, Aht. Army Tnnk AuKmnHLvc 
Center, Warren, Mich, 

Norris Thermndor Coru., l.iw Anui-lf.'. 
S1,!HO,JOO. 81mm projec-tilus. l.iirf An(,-elts. 
SOLI til vvt'Ht Prociiroment AiiiMH-y, I'nsa- 
ilctin, Calif. 

1'ni-HonH Mfff. anil Stnmplnfr Cn,, (Ijinlnva. 
Tcnn. *l,(ill,fil7. HotiLliiiK illskn, C.IT- 
dova, Ammiinilion 1'rociiroment A Sutf|>!j- 
A|;imcy. Juliet, 111. 

Amcrirnn PnliricaliiDr ProrliKls <!o,, In- 
diantijmllH. Ind, Sl,fi.ft,G8i). {JiirtrMjfe 
ciinlaitier.s. Inillnnniiolm, Aniniiiritli'nr, 
Procuromc'iit & Supply ARoricy, Jolkil, lil. 

{Jcncriil Klecti-ie, llnrlinirton, Vt. S1,2(U.- 
17H. Spare iiitrta for nirrrjift KMIIK, nun 
poiln nnil arinnmont potl HU(H, llnrllniiliin. 
Army WeapoiiH Commnnd, Hiic^k fslaiul. 
Ill, 

Snmlei-K AiisoriatCH, Heilford. MIIHH, (2,- 
98a,B(M. Korwnrd Area ActiiiiHitlcm Hn-lar. 
NiiHhua, N.H. ; Tlainvillo, N.V. ; nnd Ited- 
foi-il. Army MlHsilc Cominniid, llimlHvllIe. 
AIn. 

Rcminuton ArtiiH Co., Hi-Hiwiwl, f'cmn. 
Sl(l,20fi,407. VnrioiiH lyiicM nf aiumiinillnn. 
Iiiiletn'tulunnc, Md. Aniniiillilli'ii 1'rJirur*- 
mont & Supply Ationcy, Jiillut. 111. 

Iiilernntlonnl Hnrvesler (In., Chit-nun. 31.- 
HGl,4ail. 'Pruclts. llriilitt'jiorl, (!tnm. Army 
Tunk Automotive Cnntoi-. Warnin, Mklt. 

1G Contlncntnl Motors, MuskeKim, Mkli. 33.- 
BUO.ODO. B.1.B83 (% liorao()wcr. nml 1 nnd 
G licirsciwtwer) cnKiiien. MuHkctton. Artw>- 
Mobility Equi]imeiil tientcr, SI. LnnlH. 

Colt's Inc., Hartford. Cmi. Sl.lWWf 
palr iiarlii for upenitlnnal support 
Mlfi and XMlflKl rirte. ITarlffli-f!. Arfliy 
WeiuniiiH Conimnnil, llo<-k lnlnil Amciinl, 
II). 

Peter Klcwlt Sons Co., Vnnccnivor, \Vn*ri. 
$1,177,106. Work on the Crnnllc Ijn 
Dnm, Snalto lUvor, WnBliIiifitnn I' 
finrfleld County, Wash. Enjjlneor 
Wnlla Walla. Wash. 

Honeywell, Intr., Ho].kln, Minn. S3.H3.- 
732. Uomb components, New HriKliion, 
Minn. Ammunition Procui-enient & Sup- 
ply AReiicy, JoHcsl, III. 

Amrmi Corp., Wiinkcahn, Wis. $!l.MLi.l35. 
lionib com|ioncn(H. Wa iiEfp.slu. AmiiiunE- 
tltm I'roc u foment & Sii|)]ily AitPn.cy, Juliet, 

Aerojet General Corp,, Downey, Cullf. f2,- 
025.000. 2.7B Incli rockets. Downey. Am- 
munition Procurement &, Supply Afienry, 
Joliet, I]]. 

Hnyes International Corp., lilrmhiffhnni. 
AIn. $1,323,000. Motal imrta for 2,75 inth 
vockcta. UirmitiKhfim. AmmunUhni Pro- 
curement & Supply Aiioncy, Jollol, III. 

PMC Corp., Snntn Clarn, Cnllf- SU.SEO,- 

000. Metnl parts for 4.2 Inch projectiles. 

Simla Clara. Ammunition Procurement A 

Supply Aftency, .Toilet, III. 
RCA, Cnmden, N.J. ?2.3'S7,M6. Itndlo sels 

nnd repair parts. Cnmden. Army Klec- 

tronics Command, Phi la dolphin. 



June 1966' 



. Ittr- 

>t the 



-k nnil 

miecl. 

tllst.. 



. -AlllH ClmlititTH MfK. <!.. Mihviurlntc, Win, 
JliH.flliTi.IMH. (,'i'iii-riilnrri. Iliim-y, III. Army 
Mnlillily l'!(|ill|iiiii>iil Ci'tili-i', Ht. l,miln, 
17 Wi'.'.trliiM, illvlrifini nf lli'Mi'i'iil Tim i' (liirp., 
La Hull.', III. *'U>'M,iV.!il, [I'li-d-n fur nrlil- 
Jfi'V am inn ii 1 1 Inn. 1 ji .Sit lie. A inni ii nil Ion 
1'ri ...... -I'lni'hl & Miiui'ly Ari-ni'y, ,li>l!H, Ml, 

Itiitrnliiiiti Cn., iirlniui. r.iriu. -t,(ii:;.:niii. 

['it/fit TIM' iirl illrry n minim il Inn. Hrl.ili.l. 
Ariiiiiuiill inn I'r ..... irrim-nt Id tinn|.|y 
Am-n.-y, JMlli't. 111. 

(icni'riil Muliini, I Id Mill. SI).!! IK. MIC). Jln.iy 
ninl In. nili niiin'inlillrn for Hlnini iimiliir 
nrnJi'i-Iili-;L, WIIITI-II, Mlrh. A in n in 11 1 tint) 
I'nii-uri-mi-iil .1 Huii|ily Ai:i>tii'v, .li.ll.'l, 111, 
('('HIT"] Time (lurii., Mlmnfni il, I'IIMH, >M,- 
V'lli,l!l. Artllli'i'v fii/i'ii, TliminiPilnii. Cntin, 
Ainitiuiilllnii I'r ..... ii'1'tiK'iil A' :!ii|i|>ly 
AK.'Mry. -Inll.'l. Ml, 
(111 inn IIP i 1 1 11 in Cum,, Wulirlmi, l.iivii, $1,- 

!>I!I1,!!I)V. llni.il) <iml linilv fi!iiii-|iiMlr;i f,,r 
l)ii> Miiini minim- in-njivtlli*. Hm Ilintlnii, 
N..I. Aiiimiiiililnii I'l'in'iii'i'ini'iii A ;iii|i|i[y 
Air.'ii.-v, .InllH, 111. 

Aim-rli'titi I'll lirli'ii (i<il I'riiiliirln I 'n,, hi* 
'lllllllllinlli., lull. $l,7lM,lilill. Fin i ..... .-inlillrn 

fur l)h> iUnnii nmiliir. I nilliiini|">llii, Am- 

mil n Minn I'l'iii'iii'i'im-nl M ;;ii|i|>lv Ar.'in'v, 

.hilii-l, 1)1. 

Mciul-Miiiilil Ctmiilriirlliin Co,, I'MIVIT, 

(lulu. $7, ;!!., HVtt, ('.iiinh'iii'tlnii ( ii.'ii- 

iiVmlr l.nllilliiK ill ill" Air I 1 '. .ITI' Arii.l.'iny, 

('nli.rinln Min'limii, Ciiln, Kiirhi'-iT Dl"!,, 

Oniiiliii. Nek 

U.S. Itulilii'r Cii,,' Mli.lmwiiKii. Inil. SI,. 

'.llil.lHlll, !,|!l ,1,-lti ,if ii.llmmll.li- In.il, M-HII-III- 
Mini, Miiiliuwiiltn, A ni. v M..MHly Kn.nl!>, 
" ..... I (Viili'i 1 , Ml. 1 ..... In, 

Allln ('Imlmi'i-n Mfu. I'M., Mllwinil,,-.-, Win, 
!S;!,-lii:!,lii:i. -Ill Irm'i,..,. ltk luitl .1i.i-.-n.. 
Nl>rlni!l1.'l.l, III. Army Mnl.llhv Kinili. ..... ! 

Ci-iiii-r, ;;i. I ..... id, 

.1.11. I'miit-Miy Tii., ninl M II (''iiiliui'lliiH 

(It,, Still I'Y ...... hi'ii, IflJ'.tillll.llllll. 1'iii-liit-; 

riilii.1nirlli.il i.f I'OI, ninl i.in>|n.tl ft.rllll |.-i 
ul lui'lVnu Air Hii.ic. OUniiii'ii. Knj-in.-ri 
Mint,, IJynltvii lntmi.l'., 

AcrnJi'M.i'iii'rnl Ciirn., llmvni'v, Ci.llf, SI.- 
IHil.lNlli. Onlmmri' II, 'tin., II.MVIII-V, l'Mi;i-' 
ivi.n.) Ai'tn'iinl, Mil. 

1H lli>I,ini|{ C(ir|i.. N.'W Vni'li Ciiv. BH.Viii', 
'Ml, I -I lv|ic A ).|rf CHHI' In 1 KII'I mul 
i:i 1vin> II ]>l.'ni I If.l!' l.y tili'L Jniniii ninl 
Vii'li'iini. Army MnMHlv Kinill'i'iKiil Ci-ii 
Irr. Ml. I.iniii>. 

IllliTiinlliniitl llni'vi'iliT ('it,. MHimK I'nili, 
Ml, Sl.ildH.Viifl. 'IT, I,.IV-M (I .-.-.|, full l.u.-Lnl 
Iriu'l.ini, rlilniK... A i mv Mi.l.llllv Kunli.. 
Illi'lil Ci>lil><r, .'11, 1,'Mlln 

Miijini, fit Minuter. Ullini Murmn .V ('., l,.<\. 

illlt' ..... KV. ilfi.lifiV.t ..... , j.llll.lllll'. ll'r'i,-tl|. 

lilllIK nli'l luirlilliK "f Mill ninl '(Ml II:, 

li'iinlii. IliniiU Itilitu.r, N.'d A'<iiiiin>kili'ii 
I'l-nriu'riiiriil K IluiHih' Ai;'ii''v. .NiJt.-l. Ill 
AVCO Ciirii,, III. iiif.ii .1, I'-mn, f, 1 . 1 . 1 !!/., 1 ,'!!!!. 

l"il' Ulllilll ..... I,,,,, f,,) MM 1 (,il,',nf! 
i llrill fill il, AiniV A v lull. 1. 1 Mntril. 1 (' ..... . 

Illllllll, ','>!. 1,'llliri 

llm'litjr Cii.. Miivii.M. I'll. S't, IMMI ( IIH|(, I'M- 
l'Hnliii'1 Inn |iliiiiiili.K, ]iii-iii<'iiii<ni mi'l 
pn.ihli'll'pn n( Inliit Irn.l liliK' tiili<i iuh> 

mul Ili-inn r<>i' I'M ri Ii. ]!<. <|, i. <i:>. .M,., fi,,i. 
Ai'iuv AvIniliHi Mnii|fl I'I.IDII ...... I. ,",t 

l.nxi'i, 

/I'tillli Itiiillti t'nrii,. rhl.'in-:.! H:I.I \!,.;a.n, 

Mninl. fn/i-i, ('Mi'iiun. n.-alliiiiv Ai,..-. ml, 

IJnvr-r, N..I, 

lirncnil Klrrirlc, Iliii'Jftiiri'in, Vi, Ssi. nyj,- 

:ni :!iiiutii v. ..... i nii>1 i.i.ii, fni l li' 

nli-iTiifl, IliirlltnrliHi. A i HI v Writ i ....... 

'oniiiiiiiiil, Kin-It l-ilmul, Ml, 
Tulhm-Tully 'rniiih|ittrtitll<in I'HI,, M-nnJil ,, 
' 



T, ] ,\n\\\rn &. t'n,, |Hr,, 



^iliulr:. niii.li'i'1. M.||,M> n ...I 
tVi'iiilnici!, 'I'cHli, iMiiflni-i-r Hl'.t , McHii'lih, 
I'l-itn. 

I 1 , 1 ItliylllfUM I'll., I,>^lll[M-lll. Miln-l, Klji^ti,;,!!',. 

ll'-nliui mul (l.-vrlninni'iit nf iti.- Ninth 

mh'illi. j,y,i(..in. I.I.K|UHI<.M, Anuv Ml- "II.- 

t.iifititiiiinl. lluiil'ivillf. Alii, 

(lirynler Crii.. ht-intii. SU.I'.M.m,:), MHu- 

AU-;i lurn-i nynifiiM tiinl r.'ixilr MUM, 

urr.'ti Midi. Aininiiiiil l^n J'n-ittcint-i)i 

*i fiitiil'lv Awriirv. Jitlli'i, 111. 

Htimlllmi Wntrh Cii,. Linn-iinU'r. I'M SH,., 

IMfr.lillJ, l-'ii/,,-, f,, r iirillli-rv |,r,,i,Tll|. ,, 

I.ntirtniiT, Apiiiininlili.n rri.i-m. Jin-til A 

Sni'i'lv Atri'iu-y. Ji,1|i>i, III, 

llnrvey Ahiiiilniini, liir,, 'l',.Miuin-. I'nllf 

Si!.Baii,n;!fi. '.Uliiini |.riiji-r(llt-ii E 'l',irrnni-<-. 

t'i'inik/,iril Arnriml, I'lillmt.-lt'hiii. 



Defenso Industry Bulletin 



-IhtlU'il Aircraft, Wimlnni' I.u.-lin, C.itin. 

sa.mifi.mn. VIM. I c.iiir\* fi.r tun T--r.fi 

1'iiuiiif, Wliiilni)]- |,m:1(ii. Army Avliill.ni 
Mnl.'i'l.'l C.iiiinimiil, Kt. Loulti. 
:! Hylvimln lOli'.-lrlr rrnilurdi Co., M.nmliiln 
VI, '\v, Cnllf. ST., fill I), 110(1. CEiiimilh'd HIT- 
lniuii',1 riinll'lni'iil, Minmiiilii View, Army 
I'lliTln mien (limmimiil, Fnrl Mnmiiniitli, 
N.J. 

liitrrinititmnl [lnrvi>ii(cr Co,, Mi'lriMir I'lirk 
III. Sr..lli1,'iH.|. nnil finn--wlu-i.l .lrlv>. m-(i<i|i 
tyi'<' liiinlcnt, Ulii-i-lyvllli', III, Army 
Mniilllly l')i|iil|nni'itl Ci'iil-r, Hi. l.imin, 
lliii'lnn CM,, MnMim, I'n. Sli'.'.Uin.mw. r.M -. 
17 A liHIr.ii.lri'n. Mnrlmi, Army Avliill.ni 

HIM. lli-tlirt.ifi. Mil. 3:i,(l!i;i,(i;ni. n^ilirii, 
fiil.rlriillnn, I nil, i|.)|vi'i y, Im.l nllnl inn imri 
I'li.'.'lnnil i if n rniii|ili'li< |,.| ( .|ni'try ilnln 
ri'iiti-r, Wlilh- Knndii Mln:if]t> Iditiiti', N.M. 
I'mtr K ('(I., Mlnin'ii|i(i!l!i. Minn. SMUV 
HIK. Kiidit rni'U i'nt. ill I [IK unit in-vrri)liiit 
l>ltitiln, M|IIIII<III>..||M. Army MuMHty 

l'li|lll|.IIK'[lt (li'illt'V, ,'!|, l.nllhl, 

I'liiKli' Cruiilii-r Cu., (iiilii.n. Dliln. Sl,r.'.!il. 
''''H. " ;l I'ni'li ri'iiiililnj; mi. I tti'i-ci'iiliin 
l.lnulii I in 1 1 mi, Army MniMltly l^ml,,- 

mi'iit C.'iih-r, Ml. I hi. 

(frlHTllI I'llrrlrlr, UliTlilntlnli. Vl. S:t ( :ll!II,- 
IMHi, r.ltl iili'i'i-iifi nuii'hiiir irnnii nnil Mm 

linilsi; mnt f,n- iwn lol u'li nf ri'iniir 

luiriii mul iiiiclllin-y rnniioin'iil , llin'lliinlini. 
Army \Vi'H|n,nn C inninl, K.n'k li.lmu.l. 

AVCH cni.. sii'hif..ni, r si, I'.ic,. DUD. 

l-'nt'ltllti'ji In lin-i'i'ium |.)'ii<1iii>|inn i'ii|Hici( \- 
<-f T Mi i-imliirii. Sh'iilfi.i'il, Arinv Avlii- 
linn Muli'ili'l I'niiiiniunl. {(, l.i.nlii. 
lli'lilllillr Hlci'l Cntu., YinitiiriHiiivn, (Ililn. 

Sl,:i'ni, i. it.iiiiii.iinii n uv f.'.'t i.r in. 'iitl 

l;i'nnnil mnl fni- iiiitilin.r nl.irutri'. VmiiDin* 
1 1 uv ii, A i- my Miililllty Mini 1 1> nn< in (Vnti-i 1 . 

Si, I |,i, 

Cnll'n [)),',, lllirirni'.l, Cnlln, $[>, 7(111,11*111. 
'i.Miiinn !'lll,"i ltfiiin.nl, Ann\' UYu|,nn>. 

Ci't' unl. KnrK [nlnt.il, III, 

Illiiniil llrini. Ciicti.. MniiiKiniirrv, Aln 

Kd.lMlll.lltMl, Etrlilil.llllnli f uliniil Mill 

.'illlntrti lltrll l-llll.lil)|ru lilt. I .'..Iv.ll II.-1 Inn nf 
lilu.nl CIV. HUD 'ilium.' fr.'l ..f III-M- fn.-lllll.vi 
fm 1 M S, Army Ti nlnltiit ('crilr-i-, l-'.n-l 
('iinil.h.'ll, Hy. I'lmiin.'.'r IH'ii.. (...iH-.i-llt.-, 
liv. 
-ill AVCd C.iri,,, Mirntf...-!!, (', s:!.K:ill.in.u, 

Tl.It I. V nli.'iiifl rmtl f,,i' liir UV I 

m-llrnii-lfi-. Mull f.n.l. Ai nil' Avinltmli Mn- 
Iri lr| ( 'iiiiimlili.l, Si, I ...ill >, 
^tl'l)'>nll^ll Alnrnft, ,'!l, |,.nif<. u ^l.l'i'D.dKH, 
I'liii-liif.-i'lin; il"Vfl..|'iii<'i.l fur i|i,< Mnllnin 

A 111 I -111 nil [!<!' Illl 1 1 \VYl1 (mil Ii(, I.l.llf i, 

A i nil' M 1:^.1 1|,, (' JU |,|, Itnntiu-lll.'. Aln, 

llnnrv Aliiiiiliinin, Inr,. 't'ori nil.-,-, CnUf. 
M.'.'iiiUr.V 'Kiinm ,'4.. 1 1 hl^r ri.ii>',, T.-i'- 
iiin.'K, Ai.iiiiiiiiiilnii i'i.-.'iii>'iii.'nr ,^ Sniii.lv 
AI.'.-IM-V, ,I..1I.!, 111. 

'I Illllnvn Wotch C hit'lumn llrli'lil-i. M,V, 

f'l.HIIV.Iiliii, I',,-,,, f,,r iiillllii'V niin.nnillli.il, 
.liu-li -IDII It.'lnli'", Amiiiniiliii.il rri.r-ui i 
ni.-iil ,C liiiintly Ain'-nrv. .(..tlrt. tit. 

,'.'. Aimm'lnlnl Nl'rlilit f.trii., l'lviii.,iilti J Mlrli, 
Sl.liflh.l'if, r. 1 HII(in > lllHi ni'-llllllr I, I'll, f.,1 
'M i I'm irltii'ft, I 'tvnunil Ii, l''rn>ilifnnl 

l''i-ilrrnl ('in Icliluc l'<ir|i,, Au-ilin. Minn, 
?.|.-U'n,<iVV. II n ml il.'.T-l'iifli nl !..;.llniin Lull 
i nit i til in-!, A in-liii, I imilifni.l AriK'tinl, 

Mimiriiini I'liiintriirllnn I'd, tmd I-:ii|ti>hin 
I,nlir X I'M., KiiiiMi'. Ciiv. Mi., SI.'M:!,',!!''.!, 
VVi.iK mi ili.< Mi'!i':ii||i|.l lliv.'i 1 ninl Trll.ii- 
liirli i i'tiiniiii-1 lni|. i.. vim-til rr..Ji-i-|. 
t'tinitlii'invllli-. Mn ntiil huTnliiint, Trim. 

|-:i)l!ill<-i'l' 1M[,, Mi'llllillll., T.'Illl, 

(.Viii'inl Aiiirrlrnn Trntmiiiirtnllmi Cnr|i., 
t Jilrnidi. S ).!::. linn, U.iilwfiv Itinl, riirn, 

l-r, Ml', i.nnl.., 

Hiilnlnn llrfnuic ('Ht\i,, liiuit ,i|.ni I. Ti'im, 

St'.Viiti.'fVii. K-I-|JM|VI-'I mul fur ,i|. P -niilini 

hli.l riniiiilcniiiiri' ii.'||vllli"> nl Hnl'il.ni 

AIKIV AmiMiiiiiilhii 1'lmii, Kliin-scni'l. 

TI-IIII, AnniiunlNi.il 1'rn'nriTiii'iil ,-j !iii|r< 

i.ly Aij.'Ut-v. .h.lli-1, III, 

llcnrnil Mi<liirn. M.imll, Si;!; 1 !.,!!!',', l.Hi:! 

i'iii:lnc ii"-irinlp|li''i wllli t'i>iiliilin-r'i. )onl fur 

Ji'.H 1 1 mi" ml'i ''Inn ii'iiu'inMii' i i,tllli run- 

tnlni'i'i. i-'litii. Mi.'lu Anuv Tiuih A 

innllv.' CVnit-r. WniTrn. Ml.-li, 
/.or.i M(K. ('I.,. Sllv.'i- Ui'ilni!. M.I, Sl.l-ir... 
HIIIH. 4ii t.. Ml ,uit(iU.ti- 1it-lli-i'fi fi-i- ii.-lf-i-oti- 
fnln.il, iviumi-tniiiMi' n--ll.'n] nnll^, Ihir- 
Ininli. rnl If. Avmy Mcitlrnl Itfifttr.-li ft 



, ,. ., 

Mnld. liir., Atu'lnirmi.-, ANi"lni, 
S;!,"1I,1V4. I'nii v |. r>i nil n- l'i. Ani'lti.riiKi'. 
I'tircliiiNinut & )'..iilrin:tln Ollln-. Tt.rl 



-PriJKri'Hulvi- (!(HiHlriirtiiin ('n., l-'itritn'ivwllli'. 
Vn. *1,.M7.(II)(I. Ciituilrui-dnii mi. I n -fuil .11 1- 
(nlloii nf Army Tnifnliii; <!initri' Imi lill niin 
ninl MIIII]IIII-L fni-lliUi'H ul I'orl Ih'tutK. N-l'. 
I'liiKliH'^i- Dim,, Hiiviiniiiih, <!n. 

I'MC :r|i.. HJIII ,1 -, Cdllf, $H,nH,7(M. 

t'nn (filer iiiini'iriliHt'H. Hun JIJ.-H:. I'Li-iiliiniy 
A rm'iiiil, Difvi'i', N.I'. 

FMi; Cnri... Him ,li.:n>. Cjillf. S t,-l'l:i,V7l), 
Unl.l.i-r tiro wln'i'lH fur Mn' MHII nrnn.rcil 

M.-fjt id i-iirrii'i-. Cliiii-li-giliici. \V. Vn. 

Army 'i'niil; Aiilmniillvi' (Ii-jiiliT, Wjirrrn, 

Mlt-li. 

Wliirljioiil Corp., Kviuuu'llli-, Inil, SH.Iillii,- 

'i',\'I , ('mi filler iinm-iiililit-H. Mvminvillu. 

I'l.'iitiniiy AftU'iiiil. DHVI-V, N..I. 

Ci^llltiii Ititdlu CD., Kl.'hiir.liiiiii, 'l'<'\. $1(1.- 

(111(1,1)1)11, ll.lir.ll Mr.dHTn-.mil nnnirii- 

MIIIIII rnill^ m'U ( A N/ A I(C r.-l ), IMi-linriU 
mill. Army Klr.'Ir.inli'H ('ninniiiiiil, l'"nfl 
niniiiii.nitli, N..F. 
Vnrn, Inc., ( !n i-lji ml, 'IV v. 3:i,<l IHMUHl. 

liii'iin- inh IIU>i* iini<i>iii1ilE.M. Ilf'itiin, iiiii'.t 

wllli N'rAltl.Hiirr jirnin- ninl I'n-w nci'vi'it 
\vi-ii|>nit ulitlil. {inrliiti.L Army Kln'trimlm 
C.Hiiiniiii.l, l-'nrl. MiiiiniiHit Ii, N.,l. 
InliTiintlniial 'I'-t'li'iiUotti- M Ti'li'ttninli Ciirn,, 
I'l'iiit'in, I'ji S. I, IKlll, 11(111. [mine,, ijiloniilllrr 
iir.nt-iiiliHrii, It.iiinnUi'. Vu, Aniiy Mli-i-- 
h-ntiii'ii ('(iininiiriil. l-'i.rt Mnn Kiiml Ii, N,,l. 
llcrriilrti. 1m-., WilinliiKttm, I>rt, $;l,lllin.- 
;!!!, Miiii-i'llniii'nuri pi n|ii'llnnlii nnil CK- 
]i|imlvi':i. Itinlfunl. Vn, Aniiriiiiiltinli I'm- 
i-ili'rttn'ul .t Hnimly Ai,'"Mi'v. J.illi'l. 111. 
llciliiTl I,. (Jnylrr, t,iiiii|u>!<ii. '\'i'\. Sl.lM-l,- 
MiH. I iti 1 11 i.fi'i-rimltik- i-.ihv.'rjilnii HdiL 
Ifittlrtilciil fii.'llliv il'-imt rniu'criildii. K.'lly 

AI-'H, '\\'\. KiiKi ninl., l-'..rl W.n-tli. 

T.-s. 

E'hii' Ulllfl' (Jrnvcl Co,, Him- lllnir. Ark, 

?1.1KII.:M. Wi.rL <n, Id,' Ml^iliiiil|.ihl Hlvi-i- 

1 Ti'l.inl!ii'(,-!i { l-'lun.l Cotih-nh I'liiuinrl 

liniuin .nii'iil rrnji','1, \Viniliiiiiitini Cdin.lv, 

Miisii., mid Clili'i.t r ily. Ark. KuKlm-i't 1 

Dim,. Vli-liiilninr. Minn, 

Aiiirrlriui Mi-rtrimlru [.nliiiriiliiry tin 1 ., 
r.iiii'iiluli-, I'll. Slt.lMHl.lirjI. CiiniK.-niii'iiiilii'c 
iinln, Cnliimr. I'll. Army Mli-i'lrtnitfn I'nni.- 

in I. I'lilltnli'lfiliin, 

(icllrnil MitliirH P liiiliiinii|inllii, hnl, 8',!,H[i|t. 
<Vl7. T tin A tij\ iiliri-iifl riiiilniM f..r llu> 
(111 HA nil-rrnfl Ji..lUuni|ii'll>i, Army Avl- 
iiHiin Mutni'lrl Cniiiinniiil. Ml, Lmtln. 
Miirnmiiil Ciini,. Murn. Miihn-, sr..!i:! 1 ,11'M. 
M ill) ami M i'.(H) nnii-ltlii.' iinini ivllh Inir 
n-ln mul til~|tiul iii"iii'inl'H"i, iim'i., Army 
Wi'ii|i.iiu. ruininmul. Murli Inlninl, III, 

1'lilli'4i din.,, I'lifliult'liililii. ?;;.!, nun.n'M. 

KlllfllU'rl'lilK UMiiliihinri' (Hill ilmlllllnHini uf 
mi liih-i!i'Jil.'il wl--li!Linl rmninillili'hlliKi 

P'vut In !i.nnli.-ii.i( Atiln, Army I'lli'i'ti'cui- 

li'M ('< iiirnl. I 1 '")' I M.iiiiin.iitli, N.,l. 

Norllii'rn Mrldtn Cn., I'lilliulrl |>liln . SU.IU'I," 
;i!t;i. M!.'i'.'.l..rlni!. h-i'minut Jinn. llltur mul 
v.'filrli' |ii'..T:iniiiK ni'i'vli-.-it-. Nn rlli I' ill In 
ili-l|.tilti. Mlhlni'V 'I'rulHc MiimiKi-iiii'liI mnl 
'rri'iiiliiiil Mi-i'vl.-t', MfitnUtvii, N.Y, 

AVi'O Ci.rii-. .'iirinfi.i'.l, C s:(ti,n.(.riiii, 

'I' !>:* I. II uinl T M! I, l:i I't^linni f..r 
Illl I tilr.'i-iift, JUI/IHII/CM. '[' fili |, V 
i-niHiii-r. fur i',\\ 17 nltvnin, ill nil funl. 
AIIHV Avltilli-n Muli'i'lrl Cuiniiiiiiiil, III, 
l.ii iiln, 

AVC(i) Ciir|i,, flinil f.irtl, Ci.iin. $tl,(IM:!, 1)1)11, 
'.'.Vd-hifl'i n.HiM rum-'i. Kh-liiinniil. Vn, 
A nun null i. ni I'mi'iu'i ni.'iil. Hi MiH'I'l.v 

AnTi'lH'V. Jlllll'l, Ml, 

Kill Corii.. I'lnrliimitl. lllih., Sl.lvUl.hl'l. 

l''n/i-.i fop ;!.Vfi-itii'li fiii'lu'iii, l!|ii(>lniuilt, 
AiiitniiiHiliiii 1'rin'iii.vrnoril ft Hin.iily AK'-II- 

Cl', Jl.ll.'l, III, 

ltilhr<iti I'll,, l,i>*lni!lin, Miifitt.. IIIIFI ln't' 
m.vm'il,'i| Eli.' fnllnwhiK flvi" i'niil nirtu frinn 
lln< Armv Ml-inlli' Ci.niiiiinnt, lliMil'ivllti-, 
A In,: 
Sl,:t'lK.:tH:4, ]-;H H |II.'.-I-|,(|! m.iilrl .,f lt. 

llnl.llilv M.nlhirlnn Kr|iil|>ni(>nt for Ilii' 

HAWK niliniili'. llrilfonl, MIH.M. 
Sl,-I1i>,inin. Mnimi'liiK lultfii ftr Mm NIK|.) 

Ml>:itrni.f<:s mlnnlli) nynlvm, Wiiltliiini. 

Minn. 
8I.'iI!f*,7H7. Kniil rlriK tii'i-vli'i':i fur llu* 

m-lf-|in>l"-lli'il HAWK iiiliniS!.' nvulHii. 

AiiitnviT. Miuin. 

SM,-IHK.Iiiill. H.-lrnfH lull., fi,,< <|,,, HAWK 
inii"il!i' tvv>U<<in. All'1'n.iT, Maun. 

8-I, r ;*irt,IUlll h Ki'lnilll kiln f.n- th.t HAWK 
mlnllt* iiVMli-in. Amtnvrr, Mumi. 

I '(! cm I (.nlinriilurlrn, liullnlnint, I'n. ?!.- 

ll?rt,li:iH, cliciiili'iil'i. Kilid'wiMiil Ai'iii'inil, 

Mil, 

('ininuthlnliMl Olcnvl Mlri-trk ('n,, rllvlnlnii 

if Cimil.r t;.n'i... .Siiiiiif'int, (%.nn, S:!,V1!H,. 

r.;!7 h ;:i7 Ifii-ii.n tnti-lur li'in'li liDtlkti llt'ttn 

Cllblllii-i, ll-li>.lil|iihi|i<il'l lltul lixlril], Mi'hlS 

iii-i-inily. N.Y. Army Tunk Aiiliiimmilvii 
IViiU-r. Wiii-rcu, MU-li, 



27 



(ieneral Motors, Indianapolis, Ind. SI, 815,- 
K2ft. Four 1,600 horsepower trains. Imii- 
anniiolls. Army Tank Automotive Center, 
Warren. Mich. 

Kentucky Mfg. Co., Louisville, Ky. $1,- 
IST.liTO. 500 twelve-Ion stake semi-trailers. 
Louisville. Army Tank Automotive Cen- 
ter, Warren, Mich. 

--Kaiser Jeep Corp., Toledo, Ohio. 84,270,- 
4B8. 3,500 GVW utility trucks. Toledo. 
Army Tunk Automotive Center, Warren, 
Mich. 

Chrysler Corp., Center Line, Mich. $0,- 
7*54,173. Production anil inspection en- 
gineering services for the M60A tank, 
MGDA1E1 tnnk, M728 combat engineer 
vehicle, MGOA1 Italian co-product ion pro- 
(irnm and for project modification kits. 
Center Line. Army Tnnk Automotive Cen- 
ter, Warren, Mich. 

Doracy Trailer, Inc., Elba. Ala. $1,414.501, 
191 twelve-ton semi-trailer vims. Ellin. 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Warren, 
Mich. 

FrueJinuf Corp., Detroit. S2,8fi2.604. 5,000- 
uallon fuel servicing semi-trailers. Union- 
town. F. Army Tank Automotive Cen- 
ter, Warren, Mich. 

Mock Truck, Inc., Allentown, Pa. $1,300,- 
035. Axles for 10-ton military tractor 
trucks. Allento'.vn. Army Tnnk Auto- 
motive Center, Warren, Mich. 

Doraey Trailer, Inc., Elba, Ala. 31,789,630. 
S52 twelve-ton stake semi-trailers. Elba, 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Warren, 
Mich. 

AVCO Corp., Cincinnati, Ohio. 51,359,300. 
AS-1729/VRC fixed-based, vehicle mounted 
antennae. Cincinnati. Army Electronics 
Command, Philadelphia, 

Varo, Inc., Garland, Tex. $1,890,698. 650 
searchlight sets for use on jeeps, M4B 
tanks and helicopters. Garland. Army 
Electronics Command, Fort Monmouth, 
N.J. 

Cul lilts Radio Co., Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 
53,884,804. Radio receiving seta (AN/- 
AltN--82). Cedar Rapids. Army Electron- 
ics Command, Fort Monmouth. N.J. 

General Electric, Burlington, Vt. $4,777,- 
000. XM163 weapons system, repair parts 
and documentation for self- propelled ar- 
tillery air defense nun mounted on Ml 13 
personnel carriers, Burlington. Army 
Weapons Command, Hock Island, 111, 

Pliilco Corp., Newport Beach, Calif. S2,- 
68S,37fi. Guidance and control sets, and 
transmitter alignment test sets for the 
SHILLELAGH missile system. Newport 
lieauh. Army Missile Command, Hunts- 
ville, Ala. 

Philco Corp., Newport Bench, Calif. ?G,- 
415,707. Tooling costs and initial pro- 
duction of CHAPARRAL air defense 
missile fire units, Newport Beach. Army 
Missile Command, Huntsville, Ala. 

Cessna Aircraft Co., Wichita, Kan. $1,- 
186,505. Dispensers (SUU-13/A) for the 
Air Force. Wichita. Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

ICominEton Arms Co., Bridgeport, Conn. 
51,195,800. Carton-packed 6.66mm cart- 
ridge tracers. Bridgeport. Frankford 
Arsenal, Philadelphia, 

Eurnka Williams Co., Bloomineton, 111. 
$4,71B,2G4. Fuzes for hand grenades, 
Bloomington. Ammunition Procurement 
& Supply Aeency, Joliet, 111. 

Hanson Much in cry Co., Tiffin, Ohio, 32,- 
320.789. 66 five-ton cnpncity, dieael engine 
driven crnnes. Tiffin. Army Mobility 
Equipment Center, St. Louis. 

Institute for Defense Analyses, Arlington, 
Va. $1,165,000. A two months extension 
of effort for continued research on eco- 
nomic, technical, political and military 
studios. Arlington, Defense Supply Serv- 
ices. Washington, D.C. 

Global Associates, Oakland, Calif, $6,161, 
209. Logistic support at Kwajalein Teat 
Site. NIKE X Project Office, Huntsvllte, 
Ala. 

Boeing Co., Morton, Pa. $2,432,762. Acqui- 
sition and use of Government facilities to 
increase CH-47A aircraft production. 
Morton. Army Aivation Materiel Com- 
mand, St. Louis. 

Aerojet General Corp., Downey, Calif. $2,- 
223,311. Dispensers (SUU-14/A) and 
cartridge ejection assemblies. Downy. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Joliet. 111. 

~~E?JFrr? 11 ' Inc " Nopth Hopkins, Minn. 
SI, 537,443, Dispensers (SUU-13/A) for 
the Air Force. North Hopkins. Amniuni- 
t on Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 



Zenith Radio Corp.. Chicago. $2,117,723. 
Fuzes for the M72 rocket. Chicago, Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joliet. III. 

U.S. Rubber Co., New York City. $9,836,- 
251. Explosives, ami for operation and 
maintenance activities nl the Joliet Am- 
munition Plant, Joliet, 111. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Clark Equipment Co,, Henlon Harbor, 
Mich. 35.267,532. Industrial wheeled 
tractors, Bcnton Harbor. Army Mobility 
Equipment Center, St. Loiiin. 

Western Electric, New York City. S2,OG2,- 
570. Additional research and development 
on the NIKE X system. Santa Monica, 
Cnlif. NIKE X Project Office, Huntsville, 
Ala, 

Jackes-Evnns Mfg. Co., St. Louis. $1,126,- 
905. Links for the 7.02mm cartridge hell. 
St. Louis. Frnnkford Arsenal, Philadel- 
phia. 

Universal Match Corp., St. Louis. $1,204,- 
025. Development!! of an Army aircraft 
turbine engine test and run-in stand. St. 
Louis. Army Aviation Materiel Command, 
St. Louis. 

Thiokol Chemical Corp., Bristol, Pa. $5,- 
078,178. Ordnance items and for operation 
and maintenance activities nt the Long- 
horn Army Ammunition Plnnt, Marshall, 
Tex. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Joliet. III. 

General Motors, Indianapolis, Ind. $1,- 
471), 11G, Product improvement on the T- 
63-A-6A engine. Indianapolis. Army 
Avintion Materiel Command, St. Louis, 

Vinnell Corp., Alhambrn, Cnlif. 813,400,- 
000. Construction of airfield paving nnd 
POL facilities at Kung Kunn, Taiwan. 
Engineer Dist., Okinawa, 



NAVY 



2 Hoeing Co., Vortol Div., Morton, Pn. P.- 
611, G-13. Components outfitting CH/UII- 
40 helicopters. Morton. Navy Aviation 
Supply Office, Philadelphia. 
3 North American Aviation, Columbus, Ohio. 
$7,881,000. Conversion oC A~5A weapons 
systems to the HA-5C configuration. 
Columbus. Huro.au of Naval Weapons. 
4' Lnsko Metal Products, Westchesttcr, Pn, 
84,568,140. Low drug bomb-rotnrdins 
tailflnn (or Mark 81 bombs. Huglioalown, 
Pn. Naval Ordnance Plant, Louisville, 
Ky. 

Columbus Milpar & Mfg. Co., Columbus, 
Ohio. SS,S14.24fi. Low ilrag bomb-velnrd- 
Ing tail linn for Mark 81 bombs, Columbus. 
Nnvnl Ordnance Plant, Louisville, Ky. 

Sparry Rand Corp., Sperry Gyroscope Div., 
Great Neck, N.Y. 53,882,041. Terriev 
missile fire control radar sets. Great Neck. 
Navnl Ordnance Systems Command, 
Washington, D.C. 

Douglas Alrcrnft, Long llcach, Cnlif. $2,- 
441,000, FY CG procurement of A-413 nnd 
TA-dE aircraft. Long Reach. Navnl All- 
Systems Command, Washington, D.C. 

United Aircraft, Pratt & Whitney Air- 
craft Div., East Hartford, Conn. $1,3BH,33. 
Spare parts used to support I1-E2 nnd 
F-100 aircraft. East Hartford. Naval 
Avintion Supply Office, Philadelphia. 
6 North American Aviation, Itoeltctdyne 
Div., McGregor, Tex. $1,8-10,000. Rocket 
motors for the Navy and the Air Force. 
McGregor. Naval Air Systems Command. 

Westinnhousc Corp., Sunnyvale, Calif. $1,- 
108.080. BOO Mark 13 Mod Baa ROH- 
orators used to launch Polnris mlfmiteH. 
Sunnyvale. Special Projects Office. 
Carrier Air Conditioning Co., New York 
City, !2,528,E9S. Air-conditlonitiK units 
and repair parts for installation aboard 
ship. Syracuse, N.Y. Naval Ship Systems 
Commnnd. 

Haycox Construction Co., Virginia Beach, 
Va, 51,119,000. Construction of n 602-mnn 
barracks at the Naval Air Station, 
Oecuna, Vn. Atlantic Div., Naval Facili- 
ties Engineering Command. 

Security Construction Co., Richmond, Vn. 
$3,100,000. Construction of an aircraft 
maintenance hanger at the Naval All- 
Station, Ocenna, Va. Atlantic Div., Navnl 
Facilities Engineering Command. 
10 United Aircraft, Pratt & Whitney Div., 
East Hartford, Conn. 52,084,443. Spare 
parts to support TF-30-Pfl engines used 
on A-7A aircraft. East Hartford. Army 
Aviation Supply Office, Philadelphia. 



WcstinehouHe Electric, Pittsburgh, PR, gl.- 
000,000. Deaign and furnishinH of reactor 
plant components for nuclear powci'c*' 
ships. I'ittsburgh. Naval Ships Kyateina 
Commnnd. 

Maxson Electronics, Old forge, 1'a. &!,- 
815,440. HULLPUP finided middle. 1 ) for 
the Air Force. Old Forgo. NnviO Air 
Systems Command. 

Todd Shipyards, Alnmeda, Cnlif. 31,044,- 
UC5, Overhinil and repair of the lit I tick 
transport USS Hnylleld (APA-33). Alft- 
inedn. Inilutitriiil Manager, J2lh Nnvpl 
DiHt, 

National Co., Malrnso, Mass. H,7HU,Uf>4. 
tlndio receivers for UHO by the Men-hie 
Corps. Melrose. Naval Ship Syntwna 
Command. 

International Harvester Co., Solar DJv.. 
San Diego, Calif. 82/134,229. Auxiliary 
Dower iilants and related equipment for 
Navy liclinoptorH. San Diego. Nnvnl Ah' 
Systems Commnnd. 

11 (Jrnnsor Aaan., Viilo Alto, Calif, $2,1111!,- 
530, IHgh-])i>wcr Htuisriilile (intennii sj'H- 
toms for radio Htntlona. 1'nlo Alto. Nnvy 
Purchasing Office, Washington, D.C. 

Trenton Textile Engineering & Mfg. Co.. 
Trenton, N.J. $1,020,800. Pariichnlns for 
Mark 24 flares. Trentiin. Naval Ammuni- 
tion Deiiot, IndlamipidiH, Ind, 
12 R. C. Webb. Inc., Klvunwle, Cnlif. $2,2liW,- 
000. Coimi nil! t ion of a Ciimmiinic'iiUun 
Electronic School at the Marino Corps 
liase, Twenty nine Palms, Calif. Smilh- 
weat Div. , Navnl Facllltlcn Eiigliiuorlnw 

13 Triple A Machine Shop, Sun Franr-i-ii'm. 
$1,078,000. Repair and nlleratinn f the 
sloro ahlp USS PllOCYON (AF-lill. In- 
dustrial Miinagcr, 12th Naval Dint. SBII 
FrnnciHCO. 

Scripps Institution of flccnnii|trn]iliy, l.n- 
Jollti. Calif. SI. 777,0215. Occanum'aiililcr 
reseiircli, La Julia. Ollkc of Navnl Ut p - 

16 I. ear Slcglcr, Inc., (Irand Kapldii, Midi. 
33,794,000. (!yriiHC(i]>e uHiieinbUcs and i'- 
Inted cdiiipmciit, (irand Ilajilds, NivvnJ 
Air SysteniB Command. 

17 Sun Electric Corp., Chicago. SI.Kili.l&M.. 
Production models nf portable hydraulic 
lest Hlandrt tin it relatetl oo.ui)nnc-nl fin- tin; 
Navy and Coast Guard. Chicago, NJIVEI! 
Air Hi'rtli'iiiB Ciimmand. 

Iloclng Co., Morton, 1'a. $25,550,000. tii- 
crcaHctl long lead time effort for l1H/t!II 
4QA liellcopura. Morton. Naval Air KyiiU-ms 
Command. 

(irumman Aircraft Kit ftl (leering Cr>rt>^. 
nelhpatrc, N.Y. $1.440,000. Keaearcli ntnl 
develoimiont of an inli'Rrnlud KCM nyHloni 
for EA-Oli aircrnfl. Hetlipagu. Navnl Air 
SyulemH Command. 

18 Western Electric Co., New York Clly. 
$1,304,070. Shipboard weapons direct Inn 
equipment for TARTAR. Hnrlinslon, N.O r 
Naval Ordnance Systoins Command. 

10 North American Aviation, Anaheim, finHf. 
Sl,207,fltiO. Spare inirla for AN/Aftl) IIS 
bomb nnvlffiitlon ByHtoms for KA TiC air- 
craft. Amiliolm. Navy Aviation Sini|i!y 
Onico, Phlladolplila. 

Metals ICnglnecrlng Corp., OrccnovDlo. 
Tonn. S'2,2llU.OaO. Fin iiBflomblles for Mnrk 
R2 bombs. Groonovlllc. Navy Shl|>n 1'jiriw 
Control Center, Mechnniosburff, Pa. 

20 Jordan Co., ColumbuH, Ga. ?2,(i:i2,lli9. 
CoiiBlruction of recruit barracks itt tlic 
Naval Training Center, San Diego, Cnllf. 
Southwest Div., Naval Facilities Engineer- 
ing Command. 

23 Westlnghoiisc Electric, Baltimore, Mil. 81.- 
040,000. Airborne Ronnr. llaltlmorc. Nnvnl 
Air Systems Commnnd. 
United Aircraft, Ktist Hartford, Conn. 
SlG,aia,2G4. T30-P-C englneB. Kant Hurt- 
ford. Naval Air Systems Command. 
Donglan Aircraft, Long Dcnch, Calif. $1,- 
560,000. Countormeasnrc seta and rclntc*! 
equipment. Long Ilcnch. Naval Air Sya- 
terna Command. 

Snnrton Corp., Jackson, Mich. $l,338,afil, 
Sonobuoys. Jackson. Naval Air Syaloma 
Command. 

Otlfl Elevator Co., Itrooklyn, N.Y. $1.260.- 
100. Sonobuoyfl, Brooklyn, Naval Air 
Systems Command. 

B. F. Goodrich Co., Akron, Ohio. *1,W8.- 
104. TubclesB tires for alrernft. Akron. 
Navy Aviation Supply onicc, 
Litton Syatcms. Woodland Hills, 
$8,702,000. Components of the AN/AS.Q- 
01 balletic computer ayslem, AN/ASN 31 
Inertia! navigation system for A-BA air- 
craft, nnd AN/ASN-30 Inertia) navigation 



28 



June 1966 



iiynlem fur K-liA nim-nft, Wiidillnnil Illllii, 
Nuvy AvluHiin Hupiily Ollli'i!, I'lilhuleliililu, 
-(ipiu'rnl Dynumirii, Sun Dli-ito, Cullf. $'.'..- 
lilM.IHtfi. iSiinrc! imrtu fur M K fill nilueti. 
Hun Dleiio. Nuviil Orilnaiieii 1'lnnl, Liniln- 
vllli-, Ky, 

-Miiiniiiviix Cu., I'di-l, Wiiyne, Inil. SB.HIW,- 
fifiO. Sdimlmoyu, Kurt Wiiyne. Nuvul Air 
Hyiiloititt Coniinniid, 

-HiiyiinMii Mclul Cu., llle.liniimil. Vu. $11,- 
1)111.1)00. Mdlur hilu'ti for 11.711" nmlu'lii. 
rlmi'iiix, Art/,. Navy Hhljipi 1'urtn Cdiili'iil 
Ci'tiler, Mei'liuiili'iilmni. I'll. 
Ilululimi'tiiinliiti Co., New York City. Si,- 
(V.lftJHII. Ki'linlilll till Inn of ym-ioiiti linilil- 
lium nl the Nuvul MuiM'ly Cenli'r, Iliiydiiiii', 
N.il. I'lutili-rn Dlv,, Nuvul Kuril I Urn Kiln!- 
lieerinil Coniinunil, 

AVCd ciirn., itii-iiinuuii, imi, $.i,miii,:i:iii. 

DenlKil. iliivi'loiuneiil, fiilirli'hllon mnl letil- 
inn nf mi iii'inliiK unil fun I mi nyl<-iii fur 
IIH In Murk 17 rt'.rnlry v.'liklrn (Mliiule- 
inmi). Kirliiiiiinil. Nuvul Orilnmii'i' l.ulin 
rulory, While Ouk, Mil, 

John llniililiiH Unlvi'i'iilly, .Silver Jlpi'inir, 
Mil. $ri,fl!ll!.!MH, Iteiii'iirrh niul ilevelo|hini'iil 

work fur Ilie Nuvy, Air Kuree, Ailvu <l 

Hi-sieiti'i'h I'rd.leiilii Aiti'in-y mnl NAKA. 
Silver HIH-IIIK. Naval Air Mynh-inii Coin, 
iniinil. 

Auiriin Corn., Wunlienliu, Win, Sl.ltHll.lMH. 
:lllinui Ml eel earli'liliti' i-unrii, Nlurk Ii, 
Wmikenliu. Nuvy M1il|ni I'lti'lst Conlrnl Ceil- 
li'i', M.'clnniiriiliiii'it, I'u. 
Hcii-I.unil Hi'i'vlro, Inr., l<;i|/.til.i.||i, N.,1, 

Sr.!,7H7,;!llll. Twn yi'iir lalnernliii -vli-i- 

lintwi'i'ii Ouk lu ml, Cullf, mnl UMiiuwn. 
M Hilary Sen Ti minimi'l iiMnii Her v Ire, 
Hfiitniln I.IIICH, lin-.. I'Mnewuler, N.,1, SHi r 
Hr.O.DDO. Miilll-iiui']in:ie enriti' nynleiii. Mlli- 
lury HI-II Ti'iuii'iini lul Inn .Service, 
Niinunmii Mlrrtrlr <!u., S|irii>un.-lil, 111. si!,- 

H:sr,,IIOO, liiminl iluln n-i-oi'il.-r-iein'uiln n 

for I'lniiiilllinl Nuvy ei|iil]>nienl. ,'i|n'lii|;l)i'hl. 

Nuviil Mlilji .Syiileiini Coinniuiul. 

Hliir Irun & Hli>cl Co., Turuniu, Wuiih, y,t.- 

'"'nl I'i'iin f J'/Jt-l miarlly w||)i elec- 

li'o-i hanli'ul ilrlve, Tai'i.iiiu. 11, M. Nnvul 

Slil|iyuril, Cliurlivili.il, fl.C, 

THW, liu-., Ueili.iul,, llnirli. C.illf. sji;',,. 

IM.IHlil. iiynleinn eiiKlnei-i'luiT mi<| n,,,,,. 

Ulfeiii.'nl impiKiil f,,r NIIVV A1IW |ini|r rmi iit. 

Heiliimld M.'iii'li, Nnval llnlnmice !l.Milenu> 

('uniinmiil, 

Aln-nifl AniiHini'iitH, Coekey,,vlll.-. Mil, 

Sit.OfiH,. l.lll, Di^lnn, ,1,.1'elui til, fnlirii-u.. 

lion anil lejiilnu uf a i.vuli.m for rvnlimt- 
Ini! iK'iniiilie unil hi|'|inln 'iiiiiil,<rioi>iiiiiiri<ii 
Coi-keyp.vill.', Nuvul Sill). Jiynli-lnn Ci.iu-' 
inuiiil, 

I'litiniiylvniiln Mlntu IUllvt<rnllv, I luivi'i-nll v 
'urk. PH. Sl.liVli.aiid. Woi'li on ill,, MK 

'V ( N "' '" l'i'"i!iiH.i, Nnvul dr.lnmu-e 

^|.vp|'|'nll> I, mil, 

^i''!'"! 1 '?! ( '""" ri11 1>l "'l'-. Miii-rmiu-iiln, Cullf, 

fur TA"IIT|.;U luimlSi.-'.'"''^!".-!.^^'!..!"^'.!^^! 

Orilnmi.'e Hyuiriu C muml, 

Dimuhin Aln-rnfl. I , r llrueli, Cullf, Sll 

Mm.imn. | , ], ;L ,i ,!, ,.,,,,,! iiu ,| mi . ll( : 

A,!. '". ""1'1'nrl IT 117 linirlll'Klilellt of 
A .11- ulreriifl, I.I.IIK M.neh, Nuvul All' 
Myuleitiii Cnniiiimiil. 



AIR FORCE 

1! (iN Kniiltniu'til HiiKliiftrlnK Corp., Mllfnnl. 

(.nun. fH.;!lil!,nr,ll. I'miLicil ...... f lliiitlil 

'^VKi'ii/illlriiKi'Ti tii'iiiTiitlntt |.luiil, Mil. 
fiiril. Sun Anl. .nlu Air Mul.'Ht-l Ai.'ii 
(Ari.ll). Kelly AMI, 'IVx. 
Niirllt Ainirli'iin AvlnlliiH, I.im Aimi>tui, 
tUUIMlOn, Work In inn ..... rt nt Mr Korn- 

niiil Niitlinitil AiTiniHiilW null M|uiri< Ail- 
mliilitlnillou lllitlil, ti'Hl. |*rtittrntnn. [,i.;i 
AimclcH. AorimuuHciil Mynh-hiH Mlv. 
lAI-HI!), Wi-lKht-l'iill.'ini.n AM), tlliln, 
a- -Atriijot (Jciiwrnl Ciirii., Ditwucy, Cnllf. j|,. 
W.Htn, I'n.ilurU.iii ,,f t.miilm. llnwiify, 
Ai'i'iiniiiulnil Hy,ili'innl>lv. (Al'MCI. Wrlwlil- 
I'utU'i'm.n At-'H, (Ilili.. 

-Monnri'h Mnrlilnn Tiiol Cn., Shinny, lltil.., 
J .^l.HHV. I'r.nlnrtli.ii i.f r>uii>lilin> l.xilpi, 
ll " 1y ' A'-niTiaiillnil Hynlrmit IJIv. lAKHtl), 



Ainurlrmi Klortrir, Inc., I'tu-iitnoiitit, Oullf. 
W,l7il,7r.7. I'mducddii of lln iiniiombllen 
fin- \wm\w. I'uninioiml. Oftduii Air Miitr- 
rlcl Artiii (AKl.d), Hill AKH, llluli. 
Iirclilii>i>i| Alrcriifl. Murli'ltu, (in. $|,H|II),- 
HHII. Kpiiri' inirhi fur (! Ml ulrrcufl 
rtmllH'!!. Chulu Vlitlii, Cullf. Wunuir- 
U.il.lini Air Mnt*!i-U:l Ai-wi (Ah'I.C). Uoltiiiii 
A I 1 II, (In. 

Hi'rv-AIr, Inr., Knlil, ()k| ri . ^l.lijtv.llfifl. 
" l| 'vi ..... i In iiu'lmlc ri'fuclliiK, ilrfuvHnir 
inn! iihvi-rift mill vclili-h' iniilnUiiiiiiii:!' in 
nui'lMU't itf (In. pllnl Iriilnliift iiriuii'iiin. 
.Mi i'l>] 'ii nl AI-'II, Tcs. .Sun Anlimio Air 
Miiti'i-lt-l Ari'ii (AM,(!), Kelly AMI, TCM. 
(<('ii(<rnl Klrrlrlr, Wi-iit I.yiin, M ..... i. SH.- 
fjlth.dli.l, I'rniln.-dnn ,,r iilri-nifl, tiimim-ii 
fi'i' I 'M mill |.'. fi iilrrrufl. Wciil, l.yiui. 
AiTimmillnil Hyfili-niii Dlv. (AKSC), 
WrlitliM'iilti'i-miii AK1I, Oliln, 
Klrolnmlf Hiir.-lully C (1 ., I, n n Annrlrti. ?!,- 
ll.|ll,IH)ll. 1'r..iliir(lon nf i-]i-i>(roui ri|iilii- 
ini'iil fur lln> UK .1C Syiilcnni Illy. (Al-'KC). 
WrlKlil-l'iitli-viiiHi AKM, Oliln. 



rKi-n'i'H,,n -'H. Ilito. 
'!v, m( i, <l tt(wl <:ur l | - <-'liimltiiw, Ohio. 81!.- 
n^.limi. I'riMliirllnn ( ,f niini'niH'iitrt fi.r 
'V,' !t "l n-viiUiicnirt, Mhhlhil'iwn, (thin. 
Wrlnhl-1'nlU'riMin A Fit, Ohio. 
-I.enr Hk-dler, Inc.. (irHii.l Hniititx, Mich. 
*l.(H7,G!j4. Prnihirlliin tit roniMiilnnln fur 
(. HI iiliTnjft liinlriiilicntn. Crnnil 
"on mi II.' 1.1 HyflU'iim Dlv, 
Al-'H, Qlilo. 



IniliiHlrlcH, Inc., tiiirlun<1, '[Vx. 
SI.'/Hfi.UHri. ItiNH-iiri'li mill il.'vrlininii'ill nf 
|nirliil)li< iii'iiiiiiiHtrii|>lilir iiynli'inii. Cin'lunil. 
ArrnnuiHlnil Hvn((<rrm Div. (Al-'fldl 
Wrlitlil-l'mit'i-Hiiu AKII, Oliln. 

nininliiM A In-run, t;iin(ii Mmilrn, Cullf. 
Sl.lili!,lim). Cnnv.'i'iilnn uf 'MIOIt niliuiili'K 
tn iiluinlm-il liuiiirli ii|iacr lnumd-rii. Sunlii 
Miinii'ii, HIIUI-C Mynlciiiii IKv. lAI-'.St!), l.iin 
Aniri'lni. 

UnlU-il Alri'riin. Hunt llnrtfnnl, Cnmi, 
SI, '.!()], 701, I't.Khii'llnii ( >f MiiiitMU'iilliiii Idln 
fur .1 Vti i-iiKliK-tt, Muni llnrlfiinl. Him 
Anii.nli. Air Muli't'li'l Art-u (Al-'l,(!). Kelly 
AI-'M, T,-K. 

Hlii-rry Itiiml Curu.. HVH.-IM-I, N.V, $1,0011,- 
mill. Wiirli nn llu< nvIiiiUcii iiynti-in fur lln\ 
I 1 ' 111 nli'i-rnfl. fivimiLfl. A.-rniuinl li-al Mvti- 
tcnm Dlv, (AT'Sdl, Wrl.ilil-l'iilli'i'iiMii A I'll. 
Ol.lu. 

Ciirtliin Wrl|[lil Ci.rn., \VnniMll.l| t i., N,,l. 
IM.lllui.'l 1 .! 1 .!. Kniiiiii'iTlim iii'1-vli'i'.'i In niipi-nrl 
f NIIVV mill Air Knrce It ;i;ir.ll, U IHitll 
unil II I Him r.H|iri"'nllii|t I'lntlni'ii, Wm.il- 
Ulilni', tin n An [..nli. Air Miitt-rli'l Ai-t-n 
tAI-'I.C), Ki-lly Al'll, 'IVx. 
Ihlillicii Aln-rufl, Culvt-r (Hty. r|ir. SI,- 
iHiii.nmi. Win-it mi itu< iivli.nl.'ii itvnti-in fin- 
nil' I' 111 iih'i-i'ufl. Ciilvi-r CHv. A.'i'oiiiiiill- 
.'ul Hyiili-inii Illv. (Al-'SCt. Wi-lidil-l'iitlri'- 
ni'li Al'll, Uliln. 

Miirllii'Mnrldtlii ('iiin., D.-nvrr, I'ulu. $:i,- 
1 Hi, liilll, iltmty i.f Mmiiinl nrl.lllnit I,u)>i- 
1'nlin'V ri>iii|niHl>Hlty ri'<|iiin<ini-iil<i fur Ilii' 
TITAN Ml tirnirniiii. Di'iivr-r. Itinu-o flyn 
li-lhil Illv, )Al''!iC). l.iiii AlllU'li'ii. 
1 1 ii V ITI hilrrniilliiniil Cnrii., Hliniliiiiliuiii, 
Alu, l,iri:i;iiin, )'i- (l <|iii-ilun nf niluniin-a 
Tut- I'liint.'i- lunnliti. lllrniliiitlimn, Air rrnv 
hill Uininnl Crnl.-r, ICirlfn AKII, 1'ln, 
Hnnlr- !' riniclnri'rn, Inc.. Liini'iuitiT, t'nMf. 
g:\;;V<l,IHill, I'miMhin-H. ..... t u Ulnh tlinn.t 

rc'Jiriin'li fiu'llllv. Kilwunln Al'll, Cullf. 
All- l-'ni'i'ti I'llnlil Tnil Ci'iilt-r, 
lln^cllliii' Ciir|i., i.ltilt' Ni't'lt, N.Y, ?:!.- 
Hl';i,4lll. Alirrufl ruiiiiiMliilcitMiinii i-i|ili|i- 
iiK'iil. Mtllit Nci'lt. Ai'vniimiMi'iil [lyiiti-HF> 
Hlv. [A Htlll. WrlKlil-J'iiUiTm.n Al-'ll, 
Oliln. 

Diildiinil t'liiiNtriirlliin Cn,, Murk II. lintf 
Cii. mill tin- Ityhcrl mnl (iiiifT CiiiiNlnirlluit 
Cn., Mull l,nl< (:|iy, Ulnti. 8'.!,:ilili.iHl(l, 
('>iinilriii'lli>n i>f ininnlli> irnlnlnn fiii'MUIcn 
in viirlnii" iilr fmri' tin'H-;i. (Un'im nf Mnul- 
ni'oni llnlllMlir MlnMIc CI.IPI! I'lirll-.li (Ulh-i', 
Ni.i-t.in AMI, ('iillf. 

VAIHt, Inr,. UiirluiHl, T,-v. BIJHn.'ID.l. 
I'lniliii'lUni nf ni'iliiuiii'i' cji-i-liir riu'lui fur 
I-' ! uln-iiifl, Mi^ln, Ti-i, WMVIUT Ut.l.tnu 
Air Miilrrlrt Ari-u lAI-'H'i. UnUlini AMI, 
(In, 

C flier n I Klfflrlr. )-; V i<mlul", <)li!i>, SLfili;!,- 
IMIIl. Kiii'llllli-ti (".inimilim In ini|i|ii'l. of 
[lie J VI) I'liirlnc fivuitruiii, Mvi'iiiliili^. Ai-nt- 
nnnll.-til H.vnt-m.1 Illv. (AFHCJ, Wrlitlil- 

I'lltlfl'MKII AI'H, (Illlll, 

(tfiifrnl Kkclrlr, Wctii I.ynn, MFISH. J',!,. 
'.! Till. 0(10. l'inii|iiiitiiL liiii'i'iivt'incnl iiniHi'tuii 
fur tilt' T TiH lii'llnihlur ciiHlnc. Went 
Lynn. Ai'finiunllnil iivii[i<niH Hlv. (AlsHtl), 

-rmU'i-H.in AI-'H, Oliln, 

ell. Inc., HuiikliiH, Minn. Sl.^HIl,- 
11(111. I'rmliirtiim of (\\y.rn fur itln'nifl 
iirilnnnri'. Hi'i-klnM. Ai'nniniiMi'iil Hynti>nii< 
Dlv. IAKBCI, Wrlwlil-I'iiitiTHiin A HI, 
Olilo. 

1'nnroe Ktfol Cnr|)., I'lunniiti, (!n1lf. ?!,- 
*in,filH. 1'riiiliiclhin nf iH'i-fulirU'iiU'd niutnl 
Iniiiilinuit. t.'iilunitiim, (in. Molilht Air Mft- 
n-rlcl Area (AKLOl, Urimklcy AI-'P, Alii. 



- C^nllinH Itniltu Co., ItidhuriliKni, 'IVx. 31,- 
011), (11)0. I<! n i(in <!cr ini;, iii'Dilut'.llon mill In- 
iitiilliitlon nf n Ki'nurul i-nmiiiiitiiiintlnti iiyn- 
li'iu fur l'!);lin Al''lt, Mu, l(ii'li!inlim, 
Okliilinmu (Illy Air Mnlei-Id Amu (AKr,<5), 
Tliilti-r AKH, Okln, 

"-MiiKimriix Cii., l-'nrt Wiiyiii;, Inil, $l,iy!l.- 
HUM. I'riiilinilloii nf ulrlmriH! nommwitiw- 
l.fiHin i!inili)ii]i!iH. l>'in-l Wuync. VVui'iiur 
Iti.l.lnn All' Muli'vii'l Ai-i-ii (AI-'T.C), llnblini 
AI''K. (in, 

-l.i'iir Hloilor, Inc., (irmiil ltii]ililii, Midi, 
^1, MM, 01)0. Alri'nift. Kyi'Diicnin'ii unil iinim* 
I'lirlii. (irmiil Itiiiililn. Ai'i'Diiuulli'iil Syn- 
II'IIIH Ulv. (AKMCt, Wrlnlit-l'iiltiM-tinii Al-'H, 
Dli In. 

.Siiin'rliir Air I'rinliiclH CD,, Ni'wnrli, N.J. 
SH.miV.lirid. I'riiiliii'Mi.n .if liquid nxyif.ui/ 
iillrciiti'ti KcniTiilinir jilaiiln mid rulnti'il 
I'ljiiiinni'iil, Ni'Wm-li. Hun Aiil.miln Air 
Miiti-rii'l Ari'ii (Al'Ml), Ki-lly Al'll, Tex. 
Hiui'i-nnii Kh'i'trh' CD.. HI. l.oulii. JJ.fiOB,. 

Ifil). Allldllllllif ll'lll (!l|llil)IIK'lll fill- l>'-| II 

uli'i'i-uft. Si, l.iinhi. Sim Anliinld Air 
Miiti-i'lcl Arm (Al'I.C), Kelly A HI, Tex. 
M.I.T., Cnmlirlilire, Mim. S'l,(ll!(l,ni)l), Hc- 
iiem'i'h ami ili[vi>ldpnii'iil. uf iiilviinri'il eli>i:- 
hnuir |>i'ii)rrmiin liifllidlin; ii]>iu<i' riiiiiiiiiinl- 
I'lilhniii. lii-xiiiKldii, Miisiii. I'llfi'li-niiln Hyii- 
IKIMII Dlv, (AI'-.SII), I,, (i. llailriciiin Fii-hl, 
MIDI:!. 

Aiiivrlran Mh'i-lrli'. Inc., I'm itiinnml, Cnllf, 
S7.HI)I,I1UI mill ?V ( 'tri.|,H7fi. I'n.ilui'Hi.ii nt 
MID- mnl 7nil-i>nmiil linmlin, Mlrmlii, I'll 
(in.liiii ami Ijiiur Ili-iii'li, Calif. Oicilcn Air 
Miili-rlel An-ii (AI''I,C), Illll AKII. llluli. 
Ollu Mutlih'HDii ('licinh-iil Corj)., Kimt 

All 111. SUHI.1,-!(IO, Cm'lrlilue IVIH - 

tflnc iiliirli-rn fur II fi; 1 ,, KC lilfi mnl !' ! 
iilri'r/ifl. MiiitL Allnn. Ai'riniiiul.lriil Hyn- 
li'inn Dlv. (AKMC), WrlHlil-l'iiHcrwni AI-'II, 
Oliln. 

d'nnilyciir Arnuiiiiii'ti Ciir|)., Alirnn, Oliln. 
SI, OH 7,7 IH I, I'rnilin-linii uf nil' rnntn huli- 
illinit imllctii, AUnin. VViiriu'r-ltnlilnii Air 
Mnlei-li'l Ari-ii (AI''I,C), Itdliiini AMI. (In. 
I'Vdrrul lOlorlrh- Cnrii., I'm-uiiiiin, N,.l. Sl,- 
Oi:t,liri'l. Wnrk mi npnce i-ninnninlrnl lonii 
ul Viinileiihi.rit AK11. Cullf. Air Knrt'e 
Hnli-IHtc Cnuinil Kurlllly, l,rm Aniti-leii. 

('t'licnil D, vn u in 1 1- ii, Kdrlli Win-Ill, Tex. 31,- 
Hllti.OIHI. D-'iiliin nlmllni nf nlrl>i>i'ne lire 
I'nuti'ol niiliir, ]>'i.rl. Win-Ill, AcrnnmiMi'liI 
Hyiil.'uin Iliv, (AI-'HC), Wrlirlil-rulli'riinii 
Al'll. Oliln, 
1-iirltlirnl MlHHlh'H & Himi'o Cu., iiiinnyyiih', 

Cnllf. Slil.lUli.dlill. l.unn.-l rvd-en for 

the Alil'lNA rnrli.'l f|-nni Alrll I Dill] t,, 
Ht-hi. I1IHV. Vmiili'iiln'i-]( AKM, Cullf. Mjmi'f 
Hyiileiini IHv, (AKMC), l.ni Aliifli'ii. 
lluidn-H Ain-rnfl. Culver City, Cullf. $;;,. 

;Hili.;iV;i, I'niilin-ilnii of ii|idii(>iitn fur Hut 

I 1 ' HHI lire mnl nil i.ynteiii. l,im Aniti'lcn. 
Wui'iH'i-ltiiliiini Air Mul.'i-lel An-u (AI-T.d). 
H.ihliui AMI, Cu, 

HiM-lnit Co., fl<ulll.i \Vuiili. 8;!,',!r,0.(Hlll. T.fiO 

ellllllii'ii fur ill-nil. > Ili-lli'iipliTii. llnallle, 

AcnniiiHllciil Jlynti-inn IHv. (AKK(l). 
WrlKhl-hillfrnim ATM. Ohio. 
Nurlli Aiiirrlriin Avliiltuu, Annlielin. Cullf, 
?,|,illlil,0ini, \V,,rli nn (he uvlniifm hyulrin 
uf lliu K-lll. Atiiilii'lin, Ai-i-uiiiiiil|i>ii| tlyu- 
lemii Dlv. (AI-HC). Wriiflit-l'iillrrnnil AFH. 
(Ililii. 

HnirrHtnuil, l'lio..ii|x, Arl/. SH,',!77.:r.!ll. 
i'riiiliii'llnii nf i-iillln-iillon linitniiiu'iitn fur 
iilivraft I'.iiiiiui-niiNi. Hull I.uke City, llluli. 
Oliliiliniiiii Cily Air MmiTliil Ari'ii 
(Al-'lid), Tinker AMI, (Iklu. 
I'llInlnirKli-Jli-N MolncH Hlccl Cct., 1'ltln- 
lim-Kti. I'u, jjl.ar.fi, 7111 1. I'n.iliu-Unn uf iluet, 
ln iiynicniii fur Air I'mre wlml hinm-lti. 
I'illnliiiridi. Ariiolil Kiudm-ei-lnii Uevi'luii- 
t (Viiii-r <AI''K<:|, Ti'iin, 

(it'iicnil Dynnmlrx. Mun llliw, Cullf. 
SI,I:M,',!;M. I'mihu-linn uf hpure imrlii fur 
llur ATl.AH/AUKNA muici' tinnntei'. Hun 
Dli-Hii, Kiuii'i' Mynli'iiui IMv. (Al'IICl, Lnn 

AllKi'l.'JI. 

Ilonrywpll, Inr,. Ihiplilini, Minn. in/.lilH.Btto, 
I'riiilni'llnil nf fli/cii mill rtrluli'il ileiini fur 
nlri-riifl iiriliimii'i'. llii|>lilnii, AiTnnmiHi-iil 
Syiili-uiM Dlv. I AKHU), WrlKhl-I'itll.i'riiim 
AMI, Oliln. 

Mtirlln Mnrlvtln, Mlilille Hivcr, Mil. 8',!,- 
:IMH,(11-1. F-IIKI Hir.-riifl. MM.lle Itlver. [iun 
Aiitniiln Air Muli'i'liil Areu (AKl.Cl, Ki'tly 
AMI. Tex. 

SyMlfum IhwcluiimpiH Uorii., iliinln Moitlitn, 
Cnlif. ?l,i(7a,7n7. DI-MH mnl ilcvi'lii|inu:iil 
nf .'li'i'irniid- Infnrmutldii ami rnmninuk'M'- 
tlnini I'imli'itunU for ulr ilefeliNi< nynteiiiM, 
Hmiln Mi.ulni. Mtrctrunli' Hyult'inii Dlv. 
(AKHCj, !,.(!. Miiniipiim Klolil, MIIHH. 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 
WASHINGTON, D. C. 2O3OI 



POSTAGE AND FEES PAED 



OFFICIAL BUSINESS 



A new logistics tool, called Advance Procurement Planning Lists 
(APPL), is now being- used by the Defense Supply Agency (DSA) 
to inform industry about future buying 1 plans. DSA is responsible 
for purchasing common items for the Military Services, 

The primary purpose of the APPL is to furnish advance infor- 
mation to industry with the expectation that individual firms, as- 
sisted by this information, can and will systematically schedule 
DSA requirements along with their normal commercial production, 
thereby reducing 1 the impact of procurement relative to production 
capacity and price. 

Advance Procurement Planning- Lists are also furnished to spe- 
cific Military Service activities which are responsible for providing 
procurement technical data. These activities use the lists in vali- 
dating upcoming procurements prior to solicitation by the DSA 
supply centers concerned, thus reducing 1 procurement lead time. 

Another important use of the APPL is in connection with sole 
source breakout studies. Very important program (VIP) items and 
high value items on the APPL are identified and given first review 
precedence by the individual Center Sole Source Review Panel con- 
cerned. 

The format for the APPL requires that the list be phased by 
quarters and include, as a minimum, auch specifics as Federal stock 
number, item name, applicable specification or other technical data, 
quantity of items and the scheduled period of procurement for 
each. 

All DSA supply centers issue these advance forecasts to indus- 
try, usually covering a future period of from six months to one 
year. The DSA supply centers are as follows: 

Defense Personnel Support Center 

2800 South 20th St., Philadelphia, Pa. 19101 

Defense Construction Supply Center 

3990 E. Broad St., Columbus, Ohio 43215 

Defense Electronics Supply Center 

1507 Wilmington Pike, Dayton, Ohio 45401 

Defense General Supply Center 

Richmond, Va. 23219 

Defense Industrial Supply Center 

700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, Pa. 19111 

Defense Fuel Supply Center 

Cameron Station, Alexandria, Va. 22314 



The Defense Department lias 
received Bureau of the Budget 
approval for the collection of 
Cost Information Reports 
(CIR) through DD Forms 1658 
through 1558-4. 

CIR is designed to collect cost 
and related data on aircraft,! 
missile and space systems and 
their components to provide a 
bank of historical data for use 
by DOD in estimating and an- 
alyzing the costs of weapon sys- , 
tern development and produc- 
tion. 

Initially, data will be collect- 
ed on approximately _25 
weapon/support systems which 
are now being selected. Cost 
Data Plans are now being proc- 
essed by the OSD Cost Data Plan 
Review Board composed of rep- 
resentatives from the Offices of 
Assistant Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller), Assistant Secre- 
tary of Defense (Systems Au-s 
alysis) and Assistant Secretary; 
of Defense (Installations and; 
Logistics). ; 

The operation of this subsys-; 
tern of the Resource Manage-; 
ment System will be monitored 
by the Directorate of Asset? 
Management Systems in the Of-, 
fice of the Assistant Secretanj 
of Defense (Comptroller). Tltfl 
directorate is headed by Coloiie'i 
Herbert Waldman, USAF, wiw 
reports to the Deputy Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for Man} 
agement Systems Development! 



Defense Department Encourages 

Skill Development and Training 

of Nation's Manpower Resources 

The following is a lottor from Deputy StH-rrtary nf Me. fount- 
Cyrus It. Vatii'M addressed ID Hie. del'enne Industry nmunimily 
concerning tbi! IKHM! for skill development ami training of llir 
nation's manpower rosmirr.e.H: 
Dear Defen.se Contraclor: 

President Johnson in his Ultiti Economic Report to the 
Congress reported, on the .sixth year of economic growlli, (In- 
greatest upsurge of economic well-being in the history of nay 
nation. He referred lo several questions being asked about 
our ability to continue this expansion, including these: 
Can our employers find tho labor they will require to 

man their production lines? 

Can we avoid bottlenecks in major industries or key 

skills that would hamper our expansion.'' 

"While the President was confident Miese challenges would 
be met he stressed that (he concerted eil'orts of industry, 
labor and the (Government were required to achieve the 
approaching full use of the nation's resources. 

In thin context, and particularly as we approach full em- 
ployment, the Secretary of Labor has called attention to (he 
Importance of (raining as a constructive method of meeting 
manpower requirements. I take this opportunity to join with 
the Secretary of Labor in emphasising the concern of the 
Federal (Jovernniont that we as a nation improve our skills 
development programs to meet reasonably foreseeable needs. 
Anticipating and planning to meet such needs are, of course-, 
obligations first of all of the employers who will need the 
skilled personnel. This obligation rests with particular force 
upon those employers who as defense suppliers should be 
especially forward looking in this regard. I accordingly urge 
fhal defense confim-tors evaluate their requirements across 
the entire skill Hpectrum and make ntllnnulive ellorls lo 
contribute at least as much through training to the develop- 
ment, of (he qualilied manpower pool in each occupational 
band as they uliH'/o that pool. 

The Secretary of Labor hits also advised that employers, 
desiring advice and assistance in assessing skill development 
needs and in planning training programs, may obtain such 
advice and assistance from the Bureau of Apprenticeship 
and Training of die If. S, Department of Labor. Assistance is 
available at all occupational levels up through and beyond 
the upprenticcable trades. Various federal and stale resources 
are available under Department of Labor programs for 
paying purl, of (he cost. Inquiries can be made tit Held olliees 
of the bureau which arc located in the larger nrbun centers, 
and by communicating with its Washington headquarters 
(Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training, U.S. Department 
of Labor, Washington, I), C, 2 



Sincerely, 





riililli'lii'il liy Ilic Orpin Imoiit 
ol' DrlVnm- 

linn, liiitinl S. MrNiimiu'H 

Srrivtiiry nt' 

Ihm. Cvni!. U. Vmirr 

Dr|iLl(y Si't'i I'hn y nt' 

linn. Aillinr Sy lu'-ili-r 

AM'ii'iluul Sen I'lury !' 
ll'iililii- Airjiif-0 

Cnl. .1. II. t'ru-.... UMAI-' 

Diicrtnr t"l I 'iMUIiHIliilv 

lul. l-:ihshi ('. (, ilr. mi, USA 
Cliirt, lltioiiti'iiFi ,V. l.iilini' 



lltlHnr l.C.lr. I!, W. Hi lulftu'd, USN 
AJ.MII', l-liliitir , Al Idii 1 Vriliii I'uHok 
A-i'iiif. MilKnr... Mr, HU-k Lu P 



Nniiitiiit I-:. Wmni, JOI, 



'I'llr /. /rir-'i- I ittl ll :lt i u 1 ' Itllc t-ltl ) 
i', |.uii|i;i!ir|j Hiiillllliy t'V III' 1 MllllitlOB^ 

\- l,:ititir |l|\i)>i.iii, hiri'i'lnnil.r .fox* 
r<iiiumiuit y K>'l:if ii'ii'i, ItMliT uf tlin 
Af.i,in(,ini ilrrrctMiy ><\' I vlVmu 1 (Pub- 
Mr All';iii;i|, t r !i>- nl' I'liiiil'i I'M I' IH'illtillR: 

iKi > pniilicM Imi \\ ;i i iqiinMvi'il by tbo 

lUirrlMf nl |]|.< |!iii.':in .-)' tin- Hud^et. 
Till- |>ul |iu;ii. nl' 111.- lillUflill IS 
' 



tin 1 Mi-iuntHM'ill "f l>l>l'(MJKO 

iin-l it-, mil lii iri. "I'll n 
-iVn- 1- i-i,nl riirlni-ri mul \ft 
|>ui>iiir>'i iiid-n-.t'i. II u-ill inr\V. 
n ciiiili' (.1 tmliiFiIiy I'ntu'rriii 
I'iut |hillri'"i, [irniM'iini'i iiml |H'iij(!('t3j 

un.i will M'.'lt in 'ittiiiutuiK tluin>*lil H . by 
iiii-inlfi';i nl' Ilif il-'l''iiM" iitilnslry tna 
in i.nlvini'. 1 Hi' 1 iii'.>t.!<"iiM' Ibui iniiy iir 
in rnltllluu; '!"' i'.-H"ii'-iiM-nhi of 



Miilri'liil in Hi" Hitlh 
Ir.-ti'.l t.i !,ii|i|,lv pi-rMin-n! 
ilalit nl' int'-i'^I tu Ilic S.ii-iini'MH <:om- 
iMiiniiy. ;iiu:i:''-ii"M-i din hnhmtx*y 
ri'|nv;i-Mhitivi-;i I'm luplivi IM lid ooV- 
i-i'ril iii I iitni'f i'.Mit-ii ;JmuM In' foi*- 
Wiintnl I,. III,' liMMliri:: * IillhOT 1 
IXvi'thiM. 

T)i Itnth-tin l-i illtilrlliutfil without 

miw fitch ninntli In r 



nf iiuliniti-y junl hi iif!' 1 " 1 '' 1 '' 1 "I" ^*u I^* 1 " 
imitiMfitt of Hi-fi-urn', Army, Navv ami 

Ail' I'.u.V. ttci|Mi-:ilU fur rnph-H HllOUlO 

In- iittilrn.iii'tl h. Hi" lliii.iMi-nn A Jjll n 1 l t o 1 

IHvlniiiM, HASIHI'A), Unnlll lil'jBl^* 

Tin- l'.-Hln.'ii. \ViinliinKl.iin, D'*-" 



-.. ., 

'.liuilil, U'l.'j.l ...... -, (iXf.u-il I. '.170!)- 

f'Miitrnbs tif Lin- imiKv!lni* 
ivprinii'tl fn'i'ly witlntiil ri' 
MTmh.Nlmi. Mt'itliiMt <f l ho t;imrco 



by 

Paul J, Sturm 

Asst. Dir. (Plans and Policy) 
Office of Dir., Defense Research and Engineering 



Can cost effectiveness of military 
research and development be meas- 
ured? This question has been occupy- 
ing substantial attention within the 
Defense Department for some time. 
To date, findings of internal DOD 
studies have provided an answer to 
the question. The answer, simply and 
ambiguously, is, "It depends." 

It depends principally upon three 
characteristics of the developmental 
materiel being considered. These 
characteristics are: 

The conceptual maturity of the 
program. 

The developmental maturity of 

the materiel, 

The degree of operational uncer- 
tainty involved in the employment 
concept. 

Therefore, before a more unambig- 
uous answer can be developed to the 
question, "Can the effectiveness of 
R&D be measured," it's necessary 
that we examine the fine structure of 
the objective and maturity of the ma- 
teriel in question. This article will be 
concerned with certain aspects of this 
fine structure and, hopefully, will 
show by inference that certain end- 
use-oricnted R&D efforts can be 
measured for effectiveness during the 
developmental phase, and that the re- 
mainder may well suffer from the 
attempt. 



X Before we examine the three char- 
pp acteristics just mentioned, it will be 
(, ( useful if we review, at least super- 
ficially, the process that determines 
L; how new weaponry and support ma- 
few teriel comes into being in the first 
to place. Buried in this exotic mechan- 
yj ism live several unruly boundary con- 
j ditions that circumscribe and limit 
** the areas of application of the vary- 
ing forms of systems analysis and 
other modern study disciplines. The 
qualitative requirements definition 
process, which is the name for the 
way that new materiel is conceived, 
gestated and reared, is the basic proc- 
ess that incorporates, in one way or 
another, almost all of the elements 
involved in the management of or- 
ganized technical effort, including the 
setting of objectives, planning, per- 
suasion, analysis, negotiation, deci- 
sion, and execution or acquisition, 



The Development Requirements 
Process. 

In order to normalize our mutual 
understanding- of the development re- 
quirements process, stated below is a 
definition that has been developed for 
internal use in the Defense Depart- 
ment: 

"The way the Department of 
Defense evolves the qualitative 
statements of its needs, and de- 
termines the performance char- 
acteristics of the materiel neces- 
sary to meet those needs." 
The process starts with one of two 
stimuli with a technological solution 
or with the emergence of a problem. 
Later on this will be treated in 
greater detail. The process peaks in 
influence on the R&D cycle late in 
exploratory development and through- 
out advanced development. Finally, 
the process continues to exert influ- 
ence long' after initial operational ca- 
pability, in the form of mod-kits, 
retrofits and improvements. 

Who is involved in this process ? A 
simple answer is: everyone, who, in 
one way or another, is involved in 
materiel support of the Military 
Forces. In this period of technological 
warfare, this is practically everybody. 
The President is involved in it. The 
Cabinet, the Congress, the Bureau of 
the Budget, the Military Departments, 
the Defense Secretary, the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff, the Commanders in 
Chief and the technological commu- 
nity the universities, the defense in- 



dustry and the not-for-profits. Every- 
body is involved and everyone has an 
opinion. However, each participant 
views the process from his own 
unique perspective. 

For this reason, the pattern of this 
process cannot be isolated by analysis 
of case histories. That approach was 
tried. It seemed reasonable that if 
enough case histories of specific de- 
velopments could be analyzed, a sta- 
tistical pattern might emerge from 
which conclusions could be drawn that 
were supported by these so-called fac- 
tual statistics. It soon became ap- 
parent, however, from repeated ex- 
perience, that the many versions of 
the same case were used by the pro- 
ponents to "prove" conflicting and 
usually opposing views of the history 
of the conception of a project. Red- 
eye, as a classical case, was offered 
by various individuals as an example 
of a weapon that was; 

Developed as a result of a stated 
need. 

Developed in the absence of a 
stated or recognized need. 

Developed as a consequence of 
technical innovation. 

Experiences like this demonstrated 
conclusively that the use of case his- 
tories to provide an unambiguous rep- 
resentation of the process was com- 
pletely impractical. This investigation 
revealed also that a great number of 
widely differing envisionments existed 
concerning how the process actually 
worked in real life. 



INNOVATIVE 
CONCEPTS 



FEASIBILITY SOULTION 

TEST AND SELECTED 



MATERIEL 
DEVELOPED 



AVAILABLE AS 
OPERATIONAL 







DEMONS 


TRATION 










CAPA 


JILITY 



























TECHNICAL 
ALTERNATIVES 
ASSESSMENT 



OPERATIONAL 
ALTERNATIVES 
ASSESSMENT 



INDUCED 
"NEED" OR 
"REQUIREMENT" 



PROCURED 



INDUCED 
THREAT 



OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY EVOLVING 
FROM INNOVATION 



Figure 1. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



In the space available here it is 
not possible to discuss the many vari- 
ants that have been constructed on 
how the process works. However, let's 
take a look at the two patterns or 
themes that seem to be repeated ^iii 
most of these constructions sind which 
appear to be fundamental to the proc- 
ess. At the risk of over-simplification, 
the idealized planner's view can be 
ciepicted as shown in Figure 1. With 
time elapsing from left to right, this 
graph spells out how operational ca- 
pability evolves from the threat or 
the problem, 

Over-simplifying- again, the prag- 
matist's view of the same process can 
be represented as shown in Figure 2. 
Here, operational capability, and the 
threat induced by the availability _o 
the hardware, is derived from the in- 
novation, or the technical opportunity 
or solution. 

If we place these two views adja- 
cent to each other (Figure 3), it be- 
comes apparent that the principal di- 
vergence centers around the sequence 
of the evolution and not over the 
bench marks, since these on each 
graph have much in common. Fur- 
thermore, the divergence seems to be 
mostly confined to the period prior 
to the time that the specific hardware 
is selected. 

Both views have merit. Examples 
can be found of materiel that has 
been brought into existence by the 
route of the planner. Similarly, ex- 
amples exist of materiel that came 
into being via the pragmatist's route. 
However, the issue is somewhat aca- 
demic since a review of the total spec- 
trum of materiel being acquired today 
by the Military Departments and De- 
fense agencies will disclose that a 
very small percentage came into be- 
ing by way of these purely theoret- 
ical routes. Whether the origin of 
the stimulus was the problem (threat) 
or the solution (innovation) is im- 
material. The bench marks previous 
to the selection of the final approach 
are never cleanly defined, expressed, 
or sequential. Instead, these bench 
marks merely represent activity that 
takes place at one time or another 
during the refinement process. In 
other words, this period, previous to 
solution selection, is an environment 
of iteration. This period is unordered 
and unpredictable and doesn't lend 
itself very manageably to any se- 
quencing or methodology. It's a stage 
of continuous, almost random, com- 
munication, interchange and negotia- 
tion between operational needs and 
technical possibilities. 

This is the early evolutionary phase, 
then, of the creative process from 
which weapons and equipments 
emerge, which shortly thereafter ma- 
tures into the interplay of the three 



basic criteria for decision opera- 
tional suitability, technical feasibility 
and cost acceptability. At this early 
stage of the process, the interplay is 
principally concerned with operational 
and technical considerations, with cost 
playing a decidedly subdominamt role. 
This interchange has been dubbed 
the requirements definition dialogue, 
which will be identified later as an 
identifiable step in the overall process. 

In reality then, the real process is 
a mixture of both theoretical views. 
While each eventual piece of hard- 
ware matures in its own unique way, 
it matures only as a result of nego- 
tiations between those representing 
operations and those representing 
technology. In all fairness to the two 
pure schools of thought, the planner's 
view is generally identified most 
closely to projects or programs of an 
improvement nature, i.e., items that 
are faster, higher, longer range, etc.; 
whereas, the pragmatist's idea relates 
best to programs that arc character- 
ised by breakthrough, new capability, 
quantum jump in the state of the art, 
etc. 

Problem Mongers and Solution 
Mongers. 

Let's for a moment look a little 
closer at this dialogue between opera- 
tional needs and technological possi- 
bilities. It was pointed out earlier 
that the necessity for free and un- 
fettered interchange between these 
two elements is vital to the fault-free 
definition of needed capability. If the 
proforma, or paper, process should 
begin to pace events rather than re- 
cord them, free and unhampered ne- 
gotiation between the problem and 
solution people is inhibited by these 
paper procedures, theoretical sequence 
patterns and the need to conform to 
the organization. 



We've adopted the term "problem 
monger" for those that are looked to j 
for a dispassionate and unprejudiced i 
statement of the problem that needa 
to be solved; and the term "solution 
monger" for those who can compe- . 
tently assess what is technically pos- 
sible in the time frame under con- 
sideration. In general, the military 
professional, with his experience in 
the combat or operational environ- 
ment, would normally bo looked to 
for problem statements and, there- 
fore, represents the problem monger. 
Representatives of the technological 
community, which includes the tech- 
nical component of the Military De- i 
partments, the universities and the j 
defense industry laboratories, person- 
ify the solution mongers. 

Unfortunately, however, the prob- 
lem mongers and solution mongers, 
nowadays, don't divide up neatly in 
this fashion. It appears at times that 
we are living in an age of solution 
mongers. Many of you are aware of 
how often new operational needs arc 
described in terms of a preconceived 
hardware solution rather than by the 
basic operational problem to be 
solved. In all fairness, of course, a 
clear operationally oriented statement 
of the problem, unprejudiced by a 
preconceived specific solution, is a 
difficult task. People have fallen into 
the habit of specifying future needs 
in terms of the performance charac- 
teristics of a particular pet hardware 
project rather than in terms of the 
basic operational characteristics nec- 
essary to the successful completion of 
the mission in the environment of the 
end user in the field. 

At times it seems that the military 
professional and technological profes- 
sional arc playing musical chairs, in 
that the Military Departments are 



TECHNICAL 
ALTERNATIVES 



REQUIREMENTS" 
OR "NEED" 



MATERIEL 
DEVELOPED 



AVAILABLE AS 
OPERATIONAL 



IHR 


EAT 


ASSE 


>SMENT 


ASSES 


SMENT 










CAPAt 


ILIT\ 



























COUNTER 
THREAT 



SHOP FOR 
TECHNOLOGY 



SOLUTION 
SELECTED 



FEASIBILITY 

TEST AND 

DEMONSTRATION 



THREAT 



OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY 
EVOLVING FROM THREAT 



Figure 2. 



July 1966 



turning more and more to civilian- 
tlominated contract study organiza- 
tions for analyses that concern seri- 
ous strategic and tactical issues. At 
the same time the Departments busy 
themselves with the development of 
technical solutions responsive to the 
operational problems posed by these 
civilian-dominated studies. In other 
"Words, contract civilian analysts are 
becoming the problem mongers. Con- 
trasted to this, the military profes- 
sional, who by virtue of his career 
sliould be best qualified for problem 
stating, instead is working along with 
the technical professional as a solu- 
tion monger. It's worth noting that 
this poses the danger that the mili- 
tary professional has been disenfran- 
chising himself from his rightful par- 
ticipating role as a shaper of the 
materiel with which he will be 
equipped for combat operations in the 
'future. 

The interjection of staff elements 
between the problem monger and the 
solution monger dilutes and distorts 
the quality of the interchange and re- 
duces the freedom to negotiate. Con- 
siderations other than the operational 
problem and the technical solution are 
introduced prematurely in this early 
phase and muddy the dialogue. Im- 
portant consideration that only the 
staff echelons can provide must ob- 
viously shape the ultimate statement 
of needed capability. But when these 
considerations receive such visibility 
in the early stages that they eclipse 
the clear and consistent statement of 
the initial operational problem to be 
solved, the system begins to fault. 

In similar fashion, when echelons 
od: organization that arc charged with 
representing the technical solution, 



and at the same time are expected 
to represent other considerations 
who builds it, how much does it cost, 
etc. they similarly introduce prema- 
ture complication which impedes free 
interchange. Inhibited communication 
means faulty capability statements 
and proposals. Faulty because either 
they reflect unrealistic technical speci- 
fications or the desire for general pm*- 
pose capability; or faulty, on the other 
hand, because they are poorly adapted 
to the end-use environment, because 
of specifications that are dominated 
by technology instead of the opera- 
tional problem. 

Since virtually all interposing eche- 
lons have a non-linear characteristic, 
it can readily be seen that, no matter 
how good the input from the problem 
and the solution monger, there will 
he plenty of distortion introduced into 
the negotiation. Then the output, in 
the form of a capability statement, is 
bound to be laced with distortion. 

Cost Criterion. 

Let's turn now to the cost criterion 
during the early phase just described. 
Since RDT&E decisions arc baaed 
upon three basic criteria operational, 
technical and cost it might appear 
that the cost issue has been short- 
changed up to this point in the pat- 
tern under consideration. While visi- 
bility on cost factors has been low 
thus far in the process, this shouldn't 
be construed as a reflection on its 
importance. Keep in mind that every 
potential or on-going development 
project, while in the school of require- 
ments definition, is constantly faced 
with the necessity of passing a final 
examination before graduating into 
inventory, namely the cost-effective- 



RE 

IN 
TH 


\l OR OPE 
DUCED ALTE 
REAT ASS 

COUNTER 
THREAT 


NATIONAL TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY 
RNAT1VES ALTERNATIVES TEST AND 
ESSMENT ASSESSMENT DEMONSTRATION 

SHOP FOR "REQUIREMENT" 
TECHNOLOGY OR "NEED" 


f* 


v: 

A, 


\ / \ / \ / PROCURED 
\ / \ / \/ AVAILABLE ... 

rtATiONV VOLUTION MATERIEL AS '" 
A A AELECTEO DEVELOPED OPERATIONAL " u Rt r. T 

/\ /\ /\ CAPABILITY mKt ' u 


\t> 
CC 


NOVA- TE 
TIVE ALT 
INCEPTS AS 


CHNICAL FEASIBILITY OPERATIONAL INDUCED 
ERNATIVES TEST AND ALTERNATIVES "NEED" OR 
SESSMENT DEMONSTRA- ASSESSMENT "REQW REMENT" 
TION 





Figure 3. 



ness test. A major goal of all materiel 
acquisition is maximum effectiveness 
at minimum total lifetime cost. Dollar 
economics can't be limited only to the 
intrasystem study phase occui'ring 
after solution choice. Instead, cost 
participates in varying degrees with 
other criteria in disciplining the 
choice of the specific approach from 
among the alternatives. Unless cost 
considerations are factored into the 
analyses and studies that identify the 
chosen solution, the proposed program 
stands a good chance of foundering 
along the way. 

On the other hand, each technical 
and operational alternative deserves 
the opportunity for serious considera- 
tion and, if promising, feasibility 
investigation without the inhibition of 
premature speculation on future costs. 
Cost estimates taken too seriously too 
early can well stifle or strangle new 
concepts or innovations that have 
latent merit. A proposed solution 
early in the pi-ocess, that may at first 
glance appear to be entirely unaccept- 
able cost-wise, may well evolve into a 
completely cost acceptable program. 
Evolutionary refinement and change 
always occur during the period of 
feasibility investigation and experi- 
mentation. Future cost speculations 
can destroy or delay a vital future 
capability before it's even born if they 
are permitted to inhibit or kill consid- 
eration of conceptual options. 

When is the appropriate time for the 
introduction of cost considerations? 
This is a critical question and difficult 
to answer. However, to bracket the is- 
sue and identify the limits, a few gen- 
eral observations can be made. For 
virtually all solutions specifically re- 
sponsive to an operational problem, 
life-time cost is quite sensitive to choice 
decisions during the mid-period of the 
evolutionary cycle. If these choice 
decisions axe made independent of 
coat acceptability testing and I 
distinguish here between cost accept- 
ability testing and cost effectiveness 
testing the resulting materiel, later 
on in the development cycle, may fail 
formal cost effectiveness tests when, 
for example, it's a candidate for pos- 
sible inclusion in the inventory. On 
the other hand, innovations! solutions, 
feasibility demonstrations and new 
experimental systems concepts present 
a somewhat different cost acceptabil- 
ity challenge. The time for the intro- 
duction of cost estimates during the 
early period of this type of project 
is, of necessity, determined empirical- 
ly by technically dominated judgment. 
Premature injection of cost issues 
here can seriously jeopardize the free- 
dom from unwarranted constraint 
necessary to the successful maturing 
of these concepts or innovations. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Nevertheless, undue postponement 
of economic acceptability testing per- 
mits unwarranted freedom from a 
basic practical discipline. This can 
lead to wasteful or fruitless develop- 
ment of proposals which may end up 
on the scrap heap because of cost. 
The proper time, then, to introduce 
dollar discipline into this kind of pro- 
gram is a fine point of judgment and 
depends upon technical acuity, vision 
and discrimination. 

Before we leave this issue, it might 
be worthwhile to re-omphasize that- 
cost acceptability is increasing in im- 
portance each year due, in part, to 
the terrifying escalation of the eco- 
nomics associated with the increasing 
sophistication of military weapons 
and materiel. After all, it's not un- 
usual these days to be considering 
weapon systems whose total cost 
represent an impressive percentage of 
the animal Federal revenue. Small 
wonder, with figures like these, that 
everybody, including the Congress, is 
concerned with this requirements 
process. 

'he Requirement Process and the 
t&D Cycle. 

You will note up to this point that 
he influence of the requirement proc- 
ss appears to be peaking in the ad- 
anced development phase of the RD 
ycle. Research and exploratory de- 
'elopment are not end-use oriented. 
They're programmed on a level of 
iffort basis and aren't directly con- 
cerned with the issue of end use or 
iperational capability. Similarly, dur- 
ng engineering and operational sys- 
.cms development when decisions are 
nostly concerned with whether or not 
.0 include in inventory the issue of 
needed qualitative capability (in 
,heory at least) is fairly well frozen, 
't's worthwhile, therefore, to take a 
iloser look at the character of the 
idvanced devolonment catceorv of 



The strikingly different objectives 
of these two kinds of advanced de- 
velopment reveals that application of 
pre-contract definition criteria to in- 
novation proposals will result in sti- 
fling the effort, through demand for 
move and definitive studies and anal- 
yses, to justify its funding. A clear 
understanding of the objective of the 
project in advanced development, 
therefore, is necessary in assessing 
the value of the proposal and the de- 
sirability of instituting the effort. In 
other words, again we see the need 
for a clear enunciation of the basic 
problem to which the proposed solu- 
tion is intended to be responsive. If 
this statement of the problem is 
treated superficially or not clearly 
identified in terms of the objectives 
contrasted in the breakdown, the pro- 
posal or project is in for potential 
trouble because of evaluation criteria 
not being matched to the effort. 

From the foregoing it may sound 
as if it's impossible to manage or 
measure research and development 
during the needs-definition period in 
an orderly and understandable way. 
Admittedly, this environment doesn't 
lend itself readily to routine or reg- 
ularized management treatment he- 
cause of the unordered character of 
this period and the necessity for op- 
portunism. The manager is always 
beset with this formidable challenge, 
i.e., to manage with a light hand at 
the right time in the cycle HO that the 
very act of management doesn't de- 
stroy the immature concepts that need 
nurturing in this early period. While 
nursing these concepts during feasibil- 
ity demonstration, he must test them 
for operational suitability and, when 
sufficiently mature, shape thorn to fit 
an end-use objective so that the proj- 
ect solves the operational problem in 
the most efficient way in other words, 
so that the operational capability that 



PRE-CONTRACT DEFINITION 
ENVIRONMENT 

Project ready for hard engineer- 
ing and experimental effort, already 
accomplished, 

Technical approach selected is 
host approach from competing alter- 
natives through convincing trade-off 
analyses, 

Mission and performances envel- 
opes of project defined and optimized. 

Credible cost and schedule pre- 
ntation exist. 

^avorable cost-effectiveness pre- 
tions available. 
Specific military requirement 

Evaluations made in end-use/spe- 
;olu lion-oriented environment. 

Figure 4. 



they will represent will be effective in 
the intended environment. And finally, 
the concepts must be harnessed at the 
right time to the real world of the 
budget in other words, can we afford 
it and is the design optimized and cost 
conscious? 

While the pre-decision activity is 
disorderly, nevertheless, the challenge 
just described suggests the three fun- 
damental forms of study that are 
employed in the generation of mate- 
riel. The studies and analyses that 
work to shape the proposal so it 
solves the operational problem are 
identified under the heading of the 
requirements-definition dialogue. A 
second form of study, which repre- 
sents the interchange between opera- 
tions and cost, is of course the cost- 
efl'cctivcness analysis. And finally, the 
studies concerned with optimizing the 
specific design to maximize its value 
per dollar expended can be collected 
under a general heading of technical 
cost trade-off studies. 

These three forms of study, the re- 
quirements-definition dialogue, the 
cost-effectiveness analysis and the 
technical cost tradeoff, represent ana- 
lytical interchange between the three 
bases for decision operational, tech- 
nical and cost and through interac- 
tion generate the basic information 
which the decision maker tests 
against the criteria of operational 
suitability, technical feasibility and 
cost acceptability, in determining 
whether to initiate or reject a pro- 
posed project. 

This pattern of: studies strives to 
reduce the disorder of the early K&D 
environment, It's admittedly a theo- 
retical pattern and obviously will not 
apply directly to any one specific, 
since each discrete proposal filters up- 
ward to the decision maker according 
to its own path, that depending on the 
unique uncertain ties of each case. 



INNOVATION ENVIRONMENT 

Programs are principally study 
and experimental effort to demon- 
strate feasibility. 

Concepts are principal issue, with 
alternative solutions incidental to ef- 
fort. 

Project concerned with feasibility 
and not susceptible to optimization. 

Definitive cost and schedule con- 
siderations premature. 

Cost-effectiveness analyses may 
be academic due to unrefined concept 
of employment. 

Firm military requirements con- 
tingent upon feasibility demonstra- 
tion. 

Definitive end use difficult to de- 
fine and subject to results of feasibil- 
ity demonstration. 



Figure 5. 

(Continued on page 1C 
July 196i 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

B. F. Coggan has been appointed 
a special consultant to the Asst. 
Secretary of Defense (Manpower) 
With responsibility for reviewing the 
management of military medical fa- 
cilities, commissaries, post exchanges 
and other related support services 
concerned with the health, welfare 
and recreation of military personnel. 
Mr. Coggan is president of the San 
Diego International Development 
Corp., and has held executive posi- 
tions in various industries. 

Lt. Gen. Fred M. Dean USAF, Asst. 
Dir., Weapons Evaluation and Control, 
U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament 
Agency, has been named Dep. Com- 
mander in Chief, U.S. Strike Com- 
mand. He will assume his new 
position Aug. 1. 

Maj. Gen. Marvin L. McNickle, 

USAF, has been nominated for pro- 
motion to lieutenant general and 
designated Dep. Dir., Defense lle- 
scarch and Engineering (Administra- 
tion and Management). 

Brig. Gen. Robert C. Richardson, 
III, USAF, formerly Dep. Chief of 
Staff, Science and Technology, Air 
Force Systems Command, has been 
assigned duty as Dep. Commander, 
Field Command (Weapons and Train- 
ing), Defense Atomic Support Agen- 
cy, Sandia Base, N.M. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Seven top ranking Army general 
officers are affected by a series of* 
major rcassignments as follows: Gen. 
Dwifiht E. Beach has been named 
Commander-in-Chief, U. S. Army, 
Pacific, replacing Gen. John K. 
Waters, who is retiring. Replacing 
Gen. Beach as Commanding General, 
Eighth U. S. Army ; Commander, 
U. _S. Forces, Korea; and Command- 
er-in-Chief, United Nations Com- 
mand, is Lt. Gen. Charles II. Bone- 
steel III, who has been Dir. of Spe- 
cial Studies in the Office of the Army 
Chief of Staff. Gen. Bonestccl has 
been nominated for promotion to full 
general. Lt. Gen. John L. Throck- 
niorton, previously Chief of the 
Army's Office of Reserve Compo- 
nents, replaces Gen. Bonesteel. Gen* 
Throckmorton's replacement is Lt. 
Gen. Charles W. G. Rich, who has 
been Dep, Commanding General, 
Eighth U. S, Army. Lt. Gen. Vernon 
P. Mock, previously Dep. Chief of 
Staff for Military Operations, re- 
places Gen. Rich. Maj. Gen. Harry 
J, Lemley, Jr., Commandant of the 
U. S Army Command and General 
Staff College and Commanding Gen- 
eral, U. S. Army Combat Develop- 
ments Command's Combined Anns 
Group, replaces Gen, Mock. Gen. 
Lemley has been nominated for pro- 
motion to lieutenant general. 

Lt. Gen. Robert Hackett, previ- 
ously Comptroller of the Army, is 
the new Commanding General of the 
U. S. Army Air Defense Command, 




replacing Lt. Gen. Charles B. Duff 
who has retired. Maj. Gen. Ferdi- 
nand J Chesarek, who has been 
nominated for promotion to lieuten- 
ant general, replaces Gen. Hackett 
as Army Comptroller. 

New assignments in the headquar- 
ters of the U. S. Army Strategic 
Communications Command are: Col. 
Eugene L. Weeks, Dep. Chief of 
Staff for Logistics; Col. William G. 
Skinner, Dcp. Chief of Staff, Comp- 
troller; and Col. Lawrence R. Klar, 
Dir., Communications Engineering 
Dopt. 

Col. K. J. McGinnis lifts been as- 
signed as Dir., Procurement and 
Production, of the Army Missile 
Command, Huntsville, Ala. 

The new Commanding Officer of 
the Rock Island (111.) Ai-senal is Col. 
Harry A. Snyder. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

RAdm. Francis J. Blouin has been 
named to succeed VAclm. Bernard F. 
Roeder as Commander, Amphibious 
Force Pacific. Adm. Eooder will take 
command of the First Fleet in San 
Diego. VAdm. Lawson P. Kjunagc, 
who has been Commander of the 
First Fleet, has been assigned us 
Dep. Commander-in-Chicf, U. S. Pa- 
cific Fleet. 

RAdm. Elmo R. Xuimvalt, Jr., has 

been assigned as Dir. of the SysteniH 
Analysis Group, Office- of the Chief 
of Naval Operations. 

RAdm. Frank C. Jones is the new 
Dep. Chief of Naval Material (Logis- 
tic Support) replacing Capt. John B. 
Ritch who lias retired. 

RAdm. William C. Richardson, SC, 
has been assigned as Supply Officer, 
Philadelphia Naval Shipyard. 

Maj, Gen. James M. Masters, Sr., 
USMC, has been nominated for pro- 
motion to lieutenant general and as- 
signed as Commandant o f Marine 
Corps Schools, Quantico, Va. He sxie- 
ceeds Lt. Gen, Frederick L. Wiese- 
man who has retired. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Gen. Bruce K. Holloway has been 
designated Vice Chief of Staff, USAF, 
effective Aug. 1, replacing Gen. 
W. H. Blanchard, deceased. Lt. Gen. 
Maurice A. Preston, Commander, U.S. 
Forces, Japan, and the 5th Air Force, 
will replace Gen, Holloway as Com- 
mander, U.S. Air Forces in Europe. 



Lt. Gen. Joseph R. Holzapple, pres- 
ently Dir., Weapon Systems Evalua- 
tion Group, has been named Dep, 
Chief of Staff, Research and Develop- 
ment, USAF, effective Sept. 1. 

Lt. Gen. Richard M. Montgomery, 
Vice Commander in Chief, U. S. Air 
Forces in Europe, will retire Aug. 
31, His replacement is Maj. Gen. 
Arthur C. Agan, Jr., who lias been 
nominated for promotion to lieuten- 
ant general. 

Lt. Gen. Henry Viccellio will be- 
come Commander, Continental Air 
Command, on Aug. 1; Lt. General 
Sam Maddux, Jr., assumed command 
of the Air Training Command on 
July 1 ; Lt. Gen. Joseph H. Moore 
became Vice Commander in Chief, 
Pacific Air Forces, on July 1; Maj. 
Gen. Seth J. McKee, nominated for 
promotion to lieutenant general, will 
become Commander, U. S. Forces, 
Japan, and Commander, 5th Air 
Force, on Aug. 1; Maj. Gen. Robert 
A. llreitweiser will become Vice Com- 
mander, Military Airlift Command, 
on Aug. 1; Lt. Gen. William W. Mom- 
ycr became Dep. Commander. Mili- 
tary Assistance Command, Vietnam, 
for Air Operations and Commander, 
7th Air Force, on July 1; and Col. 
Paul U. Stoney became Vice Com- 
mander, Air Force Communications 
Service, on July 1. 

Ne\v assignments in the Air Force 
Systems Command are; IA. Gen. L. L 
Davis, Commander, National Range 
Div., additional duty as DOD Man- 
ager for Maimed Space Flight Sup- 
porb Operations, effective Sept. 8; 
Maj. Geii. Andrew J. Kmney, Com- 
mander, Air Proving Ground Center, 
Aug. 1; Maj. Gen. John L. McCoy, 
Commander, Ballistic Systems Div., 
Aug. 1; Il'rifi. Gen. Arthur W. Cruik- 
ahank, Jr., Dep. Commander for Mhi- 
utoman, Ballistic Systems Div., Aug. 
1; Brig. Gen. John S. Chandler, Asst 
Dep. Cor F-lll, Aeronautical Sys- 
tems Div., Sept. 1; Brig. Gen. Gust a v 
K Limdquist, Commander, Systems 
Engineering Group, additional duty 
as Dep. Commander, Research and 
Technology Div., Aug. 1; Brig. Gen. 
Thomas S. Jeffrey, Jr., Vice Com- 
mander, Aeronautical Systems Div., 
Sep. 1; and Col. Walter R. Hcdrick, 
Jr., Dap. Commander for Space, Air 
Force Systems Command. 

New assignments in the Air Force 
Logistics Command are: Maj. Gen. 
Lewis E. Lyle, Dir. of Maintenance 
Engineering, Air Force Logistic Com- 
mand; Brig. Gen. Leo P, Geary. Dep. 
Commander, San Antonio Air Mate- 
riel Area; and Brig, Gen. Clarence 
J. Galligan, Dep. Commander, Sacra- 
mento Air Materiel Area. 

Maj. Gen. Thomas G. Corbin has 

been assigned as Commander, Spe- 
cial Air Warfare Center, Tactical Air 
Command, effective Sept. 1, 



Defense Industry Bulletin 




by 
Capt.M. X. Polk, USN 



One of the most urgent needs of a 
modern, far-ranging Navy is a truly 
world-wide navigation system one 
that can be used at all times and 
under all conditions, and that can give 
accui'atc, reliable fixes in a few sec- 
onds, Such a system is needed for 
stationing ships and submarines, for 
locating unknown targets reported by 
barrier patrols and picket ships, and 
for controlling fleets spread over 
many miles of oceans. It is needed for 
navigating in the difficult regions 
around the poles, for submarine cruis- 
ing under and for aircraft flying above 
the polar icepack, as well as for ships 
operating in the higher latitudes and 
in other areas not currently covered 
by electronic navigation systems. Such 
a system has been developed by the 
Navy and is currently being evaluated 
under the direction of the Chief of 
Naval Material. It is known as the 
OMEGA Navigation System. 

To be most effective, a world-wide 
navigation system must have four 
attributes: reliability, accuracy, long 
range and flexibility. Its reliability 
should be such that it is useablo at all 
times of day or night. Its accuracy 
must be equal to demanding opera- 
tional needs. Its range should enable 
it to cover the entire globe, preferably 
with overlapping or redundant cover- 
age in areas in. which most operation 
may be expected. To be most economi- 
cal this coverage should be achieved 
with a minimum number of stations. 
To provide maximum utility, a single 
navigation system should be useable by 
surface ships, aircraft and completely 
submerged submarines. It is the objec- 
tive of OMEGA to do all of these to a 
degree that reflects the maximizing of 
system cost effectiveness. 

Just what is OMEGA? OMEGA is 
in many ways similar to LORAN, 
which lias provided reliable navigation 
over parts of the world for 20 years 
or more. The new system, however, op- 
erates at the very lowest radio fre- 
quencies where radio propagation 
covers thousands of miles with excep- 
tional reliability. As in LORAN, 
there will be a number of stations 
sending signals that agree in time to 
a millionth of a second, but OMEGA 



will need only eight stations for 
world-wide coverage whereas the 100 
or more LORAN stations serve only a 
fraction of the earth's surface. The 
signals from these eight stations, when 
compared 'with each other, will define 
an electromagnetic grid, somewhat 
like the lines of latitude and longitude 
on the surface of the earth. This grid 
can bo measured in several ways in- 
cluding techniques of the future that 
have not yet been invented. 

How does OMEGA work? Basically, 
it is a time-shared system. Each 
transmitting station transmits a pulse 
at a given time in a pre-arranged 
frequency, then waits for tho other 
synchronized stations to transmit 
their pulse in turn. Each pulse is 
slightly different in length to aid in 
recognition at the receiver. The navi- 
gator's receiver will receive the 
pulses from those stations within 
range, automatically measure the 
phase difference of the carrier from 
pulse pairs and indicate on direct 
reading dials or counters the phase 
difference measured. When integrated 




Capt. M. X. Polk, USN, is Project 
Manager for the OMEGA Navigation 
System. His prior assignments were 
Head of the Surveillance, Navigation 
and ECM Branch, Bureau of Ships, 
and as Naval Weapons Liaison Officer 
with the Advanced Research Projects 
Agency. Capt. Polk holds a B. S. De- 
gree In Chemical Engineering from 
Clemson College and a doctorate 
from Lehigh University. 



over a number of pulses, tho phase 
difference measurement becomes ex- 
tremely accurate, and fixes with aver- 
age accuracies of a mile or better can 
lie obtained at maximum ranges from 
the transmitting- stations. Tho circuit- 
ry developed to provide -such accurate 
phase measurements makes use of 
modern signal processing techniques 
and allows operation at fractional 
signal-to-noiso ratios; that is, when 
the OMEGA signal is much smaller 
than the atmospheric noise, it may 
still bo received and utilized for tlw 
pha.se information it contains. 

In ]%C> throe stations at perma- 
nent sites will be in continuous 
operation, although with le.ss than 
full power. One other lower-power 
station at Forrnstport, N.Y., will IJB 
used on an intorim basis. This not- 
work will bo used for operational 
development and .for an operational 
evaluation of new receivers now being 
delivered. At a future date the For- 
rostport, N.Y., station will be re- 
placed by a permanent station. These 
four stations will then provide from 
approximately 0" -90 N and 
-180 D W, thus providing navigation 
in all waters adjacent to tho U.S. 
coasts as well as the United States 
itself. 

A technical data collection program 
involving surface and submarine 
forces bus been under way since 1961. 
Tests conducted as part of this pro- 
gram imlicato that a relative fix ac- 
curacy of less than 450 yards is attain- 
able and that an absolute accuracy of 
one-two miles can be realized with an 
operational OMEGA system. 

Significant accomplishments have 
been achieved in the development pro- 
gram. Experiments in the late 1050's 
and early 1960's have shown that the 
stability and predictability of propa- 
gation in the Very Low Frequency 
(VLF) 10-14 kc band over long 
ranges arc very suitable for a navi- 
gation system. Feasibility of the sys- 
tem at sea has been proven in opera- 
tional exercises involving numerous 
naval units over significant periods of 
time. At sea, use bas also been demon- 
strated by Coast Guard and foreign 
ships. This has been done in Atlantic, 
Pacific and Caribbean waters. Re- 
ceivers have been designed and teat- 
flown in aircraft. Results from U.S. 
Navy flights in South American, 
Asian, South Pacific, Caribbean, Con- 
tinental United States and the Arctic 
areas have demonstrated conclusively 
that the system is suitable for air- 



July 1966 



craft use. The Royal Aircraft Estab- 
lishment has also been investigating 
VLF navigation for commercial air- 
craft and has reached similar conclu- 
sions as a result of its test program. 
Working closely and actively with it, 
the Federal Aviation Agency is en- 
gaged in a program which will opti- 
mize the use of VLF navigation aids 
for commercial aircraft. 

The feasibility of the use of VLF 
navigation in ships, low-performance 
(propellor driven) aircraft and com- 
pletely submerged submarines has 
been proven, and engineering develop- 
ment work for stations and receivers 
has been completed for a general pur- 
pose navigation system having ac- 
curacies of one or two nautical miles. 
Such a system could now be im- 
plemented. However, during the de- 
velopment program it was realized 
that the system had greater potential 
than could be seen at the beginning. 
As a result, development of receiving 
equipment for supersonic single place 
aircraft has recently been undertaken. 
This equipment will include a com- 
puter which will read out latitude and 
longitude and other navigation infor- 
mation. The requirement for a navi- 
gator is thus eliminated. Studies have 
shown that the ambiguities of phase 
measuring navigation systems can be 
eliminated. Therefore, an engineering 
effort has been started to demonstrate 
the validity of these studies, 

The OMEGA system will also pro- 
vide world-wide standard frequency 
broadcasts. With its all-weather, full- 
time, world-wide coverage, and the in- 
herent stability of transmissions in the 
VLF range, the OMEGA system is 
ideal for such a purpose. The four sta- 
tion network, which will be operating 
in 1966, will bo synchronized to the 
ultra-precise Naval Observatory time 
and frequency standard, as well as 
having three atomic frequency stand- 
ards at each station. 

OMEGA is designed so that re- 
ceivers may be operated automatically 
for maximum convenience and relia- 



bility, or manually for minimum cost. 
Signal format is such that receivers 
can cost from as little as $1,000 to a 
maximum dictated by user convenience 
requirements. Every effort has been 
made to foresee the techniques and re- 
quirements of the future and to design 
the system so that it will be useful for 
many years to come. 

This, then, is the OMEGA Naviga- 
tion System a system with a future 
of valued, versatile and efficient serv- 
ice to surface ships, submarines and 
aircraft of the United States and 
her allies. Although there are some 
RD efforts for system improve- 
ment, OMEGA is presently capa- 
ble of being implemented as the 
first world-wide, man-made navigation 
system. An OMEGA Navigation Sys- 
tem Project Management Office (PM- 
9) has been established under the 
Chief of Naval Material. This office 
directs, coordinates and serves as a 
focal point for all efforts concerning 
the development, evaluation, imple- 
mentation and operation of the 
OMEGA system. Although the Navy 
has sponsored the development of this 
system, it becomes apparent that fu- 
ture operations will require the close 
cooperation of many agencies in the 
United States and several other coun- 
tries. The Federal Aviation Agency, 
in rather close collaboration with the 
British Ministry of Aviation, assumes 
responsibility for determining- the 
feasibility of OMEGA for civil avia- 
tion and especially for the guidance of 
the supersonic transport of the next 
decade. The Air Force has loaned the 
Forrestport transmitting station and 
an aircraft for flight evaluation tests; 
the Army has supported tests of the 
capability of OMEGA for helicopter 
navigation. The Navy will operate the 
transmitting stations during a three- 
or four-year period of development 
and testing. After the system becomes 
fully operational, it is planned that 
the Coast Guard will assume responsi- 
bility for operating all of the trans- 
mitting stations. 



DEFENSE PRIME COt 
TO SMALL 1 

(Amounts in 1 


^TRACT AWARDS 
BUSINESS 

'housands) 

July 1965 July 1964 
April I960 April 1965 
$25,737,577 $20,020,718 

5,692,782 4,062,136 


Procurement from Small Business 




21.7 20.2 







Navy Guide 
Available From G.P.O. 

A new publication of the Naval 
Material Command, the "Guide for 
the Preparation of Proposed Techni- 
cal Approaches (PTA)," NAVMAT 
P3910A, is available for purchase 
from the Superintendent of Docu- 
ments, U. S. Government Printing 
Office, Washington, D. C. 20402. The 
price is $1.50 per copy. 

The purpose of the publication is 
to provide guidelines for the prepa- 
ration of Proposed Technical Ap- 
proaches (PTA) documents and an 
explanation of the need for the in- 
formation required therein. The 
guide is organized into 12 sections 
which parallel the Proposed Technical 
Approaches format required by exist- 
ing Navy directives. At the end of 
each section a check list is provided 
to emphasize the major points which 
should be covered in the section con- 
cerned. 

The new guide is a companion to 
the "Guide for the Preparation 
of Technical Development Plans 
(TDP)," NAVMAT P 3910, dated 
July 1965, which can also_be obtained 
from the Government Printing Office 
for $1.75 per copy. 



USAF Report on 

Tactical Air Capabilities 

Available Thru DDC 

A report classified Secret, covering 
a study on Air Force tactical air op- 
erations and problems made by the 
Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, 
is available to DOD contractors with 
required "need to know" and security 
clearance through the Defense Docu- 
mentation Center (DDC). It is titled 
"Air Force Review of USAF Scientific 
Advisory Board Tactical Air Capabili- 
ties Task Force Final Report." The 
DDC order number is AD-372 744. 

This document combines some 150 
Scientific Advisory Board conclusions 
and recommendations contained in its 
report completed in June 1965 and the 
Air Force comments which were for- 
awarded to the board in January 1966. 
The report covers the following areas : 
aircraft, logistics, reconnaissance, avi- 
onics, command and control, weapons 
and munitions, test and evaluation, 
meteorology and engineering geology. 

Authorized DOD contractors and 
grantees may request this document 
from: 

Defense Documentation Center 
Cameron Station 
Alexandria, Va. 22314 



Defense Industry Bulletin 




by 

Roy K, Davenport 

Dep. Asst. Secretary of Defense (Manpower, Planning and Research) 
Office of Asst. Secretary of Defense (Manpower) 



Government officials challenged in- 
dustry to apply its advanced tech- 
nologies and problem-solving capa- 
bilities in improving: the quality of 
education and training at the Con- 
ference on Engineering Systems for 
Education and Training; held in 
Washington, D. C., on June 14 and 
15. The conference was sponsored by 
the Defense Department with the 
participation of the Office of Educa- 
tion and in affiliation with the Na- 
tional Security Industrial Associa- 
tion. 

Much more stimulating; and pro- 
ductive than had been anticipated, 
the conference was attended by over 
500 representatives of industry and 
2fiO Federal officials, both military 
and civilian. For the benefit of those 
who attended and for other inter- 
ested readers of the Bulletin, in this 
article I would like to emphasize sev- 
eral points made during the confer- 
ence. A complete transcript of the 
proceedings will be available in Au- 
gust through the National Security 
Industrial Association. 

To begin with, the coat of indi- 
vidual training of the Military 
Establishment amounts to $4 billion 
annually. Of this amount $2 billion 
is spent on training of enlisted men 
of which half is used for basic mili- 
tary training. These figures suggest 
that even small improvements can 
produce very significant dividends to 
our military readiness and we seek 
industry's ideas in developing better 
management techniques, individual 
motivation, selection techniques and 
reduction of attrition rates. 

After basic training, the enlistee 
must become proficient in one or more 
of some 1,500 skill areas. Only 12 per- 
cent of our men fire weapons, while 50 
percent are trained in technical skills. 
Our basic training investment in the 
enlistee is about $1,200. Skill training 
requires an additional investment of 
from $2,000 to $12,000 per man. How- 
ever, since our first term reenlistment 
rates are only 20 percent, we must op- 
timize time spent in training versus 



8 



time spent on the job to got a return 
on our investment. 

In addition to training our enlisted 
men, we must provide continuous edu- 
cation for our 325,000-man officer 
corps. About 05,000 officers engage in 
some form of professional education 
each year at a cost of $400 million. 
Others are involved in costly training 
programs, Pilot training, for example, 
costs about $1 billion a year ranging 
from $250,000 for a jet pilot to 
.$45,000 for a helicopter pilot. Here we 
want to know whether or not more 
use should be made of university ad- 
vanced courses, whether some educa- 
tion and training courses can be re- 
duced in time, and whether off-duty 
education through self-instructional 
techniques is desirable. 

Costs of other Defense training in- 
cludes 90 million for secondary over- 
seas schools for military dependents. 
Additional costs are incurred to 
operate 83 correspondence schools. 

I feel that industry, as an em- 
ployer, will recognize it has a high 
stake in the quality of military educa- 
tion and training. Ninety-six percent 
of our enlisted men and 84 percent of 
our officers retire in time to have sec- 
ond careers in civilian life. About 16 
percent of our nation's total work 
force has obtained vocational training 
in the Armed Services. In a very real 
sense industry has a vested interest 
in the type, magnitude and quality 
of the training which we provide for 
some of its future employees. 

Besides contributing to the nation's 
total manpower pool, the Defense De- 
partment can play an important role 
which is highly relevant to evolution 
of the education technology industry. 
To the extent that we promote inno- 
vations in education and training, 
DOD offers itself as a huge labora- 
tory to facilitate translation of edu- 
cation research into education tech- 
nology. This underlies our desire to 
work closely with demonstration cen- 
ters in universities and with the 
emerging "education industry." In his 
keynote response Dr. J. Sterling Liv- 



ingston of Harvard University, it 

speaker at the conference, cogently 
remarked : 

"Heretofore, the industry 1ms 
licen unable to find wUhin our 
educational establishment the op- 
portunity needed to demonstrate 
the effect! veil ess of its advanced 
technology. . . . Our public school 
systems have not been in a posi- 
tion to lie responsive to bold new 
experiments in education. Indus- 
try often has been thwarted in 
taking initiative and frustrated in 
its efforts to find a market for its 
new concepts. . . , This conference 
underscores the fact that, whereas 
our education establishment may 
be slow in responding to advance 
in technology, our Military Serv- 
ices are leaders in applying now 
techniques in the classroom. . . . 
Our Federal Government in now 
creating through the OJfico of Kil- 
ucation, the Department of Labor, 
the Office of Economic Opportu- 
nity and the Department of De- 
fense a new opportunity for Ihfi 
education technology industry lo 
demonstrate the value of iU inno- 
vations and to gain support for 
research and development." 
While we urn proud of thn prngrr^s 
which wo have miuln in training 
through the applications of advanced 
technologies and management con- 
cepts in the Defense DoparliiKint, we 
arc constantly socking new solutions 
to old training problems. I believe thnt 
industry will find real opportunities to 
apply the full range of its expertise 
from re-search and development, to 
prototype, to final production in pur- 
ticulur areas. Iltn-nin lies thn oppor- 
tunity for development of now idtriis, 
techniques and equipment and Hie 
demonstration of their effectiveness 
not only to the military but also to 
school systems, industrialists :md 
other consumers in the education 
market. 

The Defense Department is anxious 
to consider industry's proposals in 
helping us achieve the five objectives 
wo are setting: 

First, we need to systematically" 
challenge course content to mnko cer- 
tain that it is directly correlated with 
on-the-job performance requirements* 
and geared to the minimum mental 
level which can perform the task with 
full satisfaction. With about 2,700 
courses given to 1.8 million students 

(Continued on page 13) 
July 1966 



S M T W T F S 


i S M T W T F S 


S M T W T F S 


1 2 
3456789 

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 
24 25 26 27 28 39 30 
31 


i 123456 
; 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 
21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 
28 29 30 31 


123 

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
11 12 13 14 15 IS 17 
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 
2fi 26 27 28 29 30 



SPEAKERS CALENDAR 



DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Hon. W. Brewster Kopp, Asst. Sec- 
retary of the Army (Financial Man- 
agement), at Army Comptrollership 
School Commencement, Syracuse, 
N, Y., July 29. 

Brig, Gen. Lloyd B. Ramsey, Do]). 
Chief of Information, at 9th Infan- 
try Div. Reunion Dinner, Shoreham 
Hotel, Washington, D. C., July 30. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

llAdm. Henry II. Caldwcll, Com- 
mander, Fleet Air Jacksonville, at 
Douglas Aircraft Co. Management 
Club Meeting, Sacramento, Calif., 
Sept. 21. 

Hon. Paul H. Nitze, Secretary of 
the Navy, at Institute of Electrical 



ami Electronics Engineers Convention, 
Washington, D. C., Oct. 3. 

Mr. Paul R. Miller, Asst. for Qual- 
ity Control, Special Projects Office, 
at American Institute of Engineers 
Region Two Conference-, Atlantic 
City, N. J., Oct. 13. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Maj. Gen. B. I. Funlt, Commander, 
Space Systems Div. r Air Force Sys- 
tems Command, at California State 
Collegu, Long Beach, Calif., Aug. 8. 

Gen. J. P. McConnell, Chief of 
Staff, USAF, at Cheney Award 
Luncheon, Washington, D. C., Aug. 
9. (Appearance -only) ; at Defense 
Orientation Conference Assn. Meet- 
ing, Washington, D. C., Sept. 30. 



Gen. H. M. Estes, Commander, Mil- 
itary Airlift Command, at National 
Defense Transportation Assn. Meet- 
ing', Atlanta, Ga., Aug. 11. 

Hon. L. Marks, Jr., Asst. Secretary 
of the Air Force (Financial Man- 
agement), at CPA Society Meeting, 
Los Angeles, Calif., Sept, 12. 

Gen. G. I*. Disosway, Commander, 
Tactical Air Command, at Chamber 
of Commerce Meeting, Oklahoma 
City, Okla., Sept. 10. 

Maj. Gen. H. E. Hum fold, Com- 
mander, 1st Strategic Aerospace Div., 
at National Security Industrial Assn. 
Meeting-, Vandenborg AFB, Calif., 
Sept. 23. 

U. Gen. T. P. Gerrity, Dep. Chief 
of Staff, Systems and Logistics, at 
U. S. Air Force Institute of Tech- 
nology Symposium, Sunnyvale, Calif., 
Oct. B. 



DIPEC Standards Improve Property Management 



Two primary responsibilities as- 
signed to the Defense Industrial Plant 
Equipment Center (DIPEC), in Mem- 
phis, Tenn., are to maintain master 
property records of DOD-owncd in- 
dustrial plant equipment (IPE) and 
to redistribute idle IPE. 

High value items of DOD-ownod 
equipment such as IPE are individ- 
ually controlled and managed through 
a system of property records which 
provides a moans for maintaining con- 
tinuous visibility over such informa- 
tion as location, program use, age, 
condition and cost. Good descriptions 
are of critical importance to property 
management at all levels and to effec- 
tive redistribution when property be- 
comes idle. 

DIPEC is developing standards for 
describing IPE which Defense activi- 
ties can use in preparing property rec- 
ords for their own management uses 
and for reporting idle IPE to DIPEC. 
These standards will improve commu- 
nications among Defense activities and 
between Defense activities and their 
contractors. Of equal importance is 
their adaptation to mechanized pro- 
cessing of information, thus reducing 
administrative workloads and costs. 
Many large private companies have 
adapted, or are in the process of 
adapting, these standards to their 
own management improvement pro- 
grams. 

DIPEC standards are published in 
handbooks listed below with the num- 



ber, title and Federal Supply Classifi- 
cation (FSC) : 

DSAH 4215.1 Electrical and Electro- 
nic Properties Measuring and Test- 
ing Instruments, FSC 6625, $1,26. 

DSAH 421G.2 Woodworking Ma- 
chines, FSG 3220, $0.75. 

DSAH 4215.3 Supplement to Produc- 
tion Equipment Directory Dl 
Metal- Work ing Machinery 1960 Re- 
vision, FSC 3411 thru 9419, 8441 
thru 3440, $2.00. 

DSAH 4215.4 Industrial Furnaces 
and Ovens, FSC 3424, 365G, 4430, 
Volume 1, $2.25; Volume 2, $1.76. 

DSAH 4216.5 Material Handling 
Equipment and Lifting: Electro- 
Magnets, FSC 3815, 3910, 8920, 
3930, 8960, 3990, Volume 1, $1.60; 
Volume 2, $1.60. 

DSAH 4215.G Physical Properties 
Testing Equipment, FSC 6635, 
$1.75. 

DSAH 4216.7 Wrapping and Pack- 
aging Machinery, FSC 3540, $0,00. 

DSAH 4215.8 Textile Industries Ma- 
chinery and Industrial Sewing Ma- 
chines, FSC 3620, 3580, 3625, $0,45. 

DSAH 4215.9 Distribution and 
Power Station Transformers, FSC 
6120, $0.65. 

DSAH 4215.10, Environmental Cham- 
bers, FSC G63G, $0.70. 

DSAH 4215.11 Power Conversion 
Equipment, Electrical, FSG 6130, 

$0.65. 



DSAH 4215.12 Rolling Mills, Draw- 
ing Machines and Metal Finishing 
Equipment, FSC 3422, 3426, $1.50. 

DSAH 4215.18 Portable Machine 
Tools and Toolroom Layout Plates 
and Tahlcs, FSC 3450, 3460, E220, 
$.1.00. 

DSAH 4215.14 Compressors and 
Vacuum Pumps, FSC 4310, $1.25. 

DSAH 4215,15 Liquid and Gas, 
Pressure, Temperature, Humidity 
and Mechanical Motion Measuring 
and Controlling Instruments, FSC 
6680, 6685, $0.65. 

DSAH 4215.1(1- Crystal and Glass In- 
dustries Machinery, FSC 3635, 
$0.45. 

DSAH 4216.17 Driers, Dehyclrators 
and Anhydrators, FSC 4440, $0.45. 

Distribution of the handbooks has 
been made through normal channels 
to defense contractors and to military 
activities. Defense contractors who 
have not been furnished copies of the 
handbooks for use in managing Gov- 
ernment-owned IPE should request 
them through their appropriate Gov- 
ernment representatives. The hand- 
books may also be purchased from the 
Superintendent of Documents, U.S. 
Government Printing Oflice, Wash- 
ington, D.C. 20402, at the cost indi- 
cated in the listing. 

Other handbooks are in the process 
o:f being published or being prepared 
for publication. Notice will be given 
v/hen they are available. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



OF EVENTS 

Aug. 13-14: Greater Cleveland Air 
Show, Iliii'kc-Lnkefront, Cleveland, 
Ohio, 

Aiiff. 23-26: Institute of Electrical 
and Electronics Engineers Western 
Electronic Show and Conference, 
Los Angeles, Calif. 

Aug. 29-31 r Institute of Electrical 
and Electronics Engineers Ocean 
Electronics Symposium, Honolulu, 
Hawaii, 

Sept. 2-5: Canadian International 
Air Show, National Exhibition 
Parkj Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 

Sept. 5-11: National Championship 
Air Race, Reno, Nev. 

Sept, 11-16; American Chemical So- 
ciety meeting, New York City. 

Sept. 13-15: National Security Indus- 
trial Assn-U. S. Air Force Elec- 
tronics Conference (Secret), Mur- 
ray Hall, U. S. Naval Station, 
Boston, Mass. 

Sept. 14-16: Animal Air Force Assn. 
Fall Meeting, Sheraton Park Hotel, 
Washington, D. C. 

Sept. 17-18: Midwestern Aviation and 
Space Exposition, Willow Run Air- 
port, Detroit, Midi. 

Sept. 19-20: Government-Industry 
Procurement CEinic, Portland, Ore. 

Sept. 22-23: Government-Industry 
Procurement Clinic, Seattle, Wash. 

Sept. 2G-2S: Sixth Annual National 
Conference on Environmental Ef- 
fects on Aircraft and Propulsion 
Systems, U. S. Naval Air Turbine 
Test Station, Princeton, N. J. 

Sept. 28-29: National Security Indus- 
trial Asaii, Marine Geodesy Sym- 
posium, Columbus, Ohio. 
Oct. 10-12: 19GG Assn. of the U.S. 
Army Meeting, Sheraton-Park 
Hotel, Washington, D.C. 



SMC-AMC 
Consolidated 

Tha U. S. Army Supply and 
Maintenance Command (SMC) was 
merged with the Army Materiel Com- 
mand (ASIC) on July 1 placing direct 
control of field installations and ac- 
t-'vities, formerly under SMC, under 
AMC. The merger will clarify com- 
mand responsibilities, expedite tlie 
decision-making process, and provide 
a mote cohesive and responsive or- 
ganization with focus on the develop- 
ment ami support of materiel to meet 
requirements of the field forces, 

A physical regrouping of the two 
headquarters last year in the Wash- 
ington, D.C., area has facilitated the 
consolidation. Staff elements were re- 
located to bring together elements do- 
ing similar functions. The consoli- 
dated AMC will continue to be 
housed in Building T-7, the Nassif 
Building;, and the Naval Weapons 
Plant. 



AUGUST 

Electron Spin Resonance Spectro- 

scopy Seminar, Aug. 1-3, at Michigan 
State University, East Lansing, Mich. 
Sponsors: Army Research Office-Dur- 
ham, Atomic Energy Commission, 
American Chemical Society and Mich- 
igan State University. Contact: Dr. 
David R. Squire, Chemistry Div., 
Army Research Office- Durham, Box 
CM, Duke Station, Durham, N. C., 
27700, {Area Code 919) 28G-2285. 

19GG Linguistic Institute Confer- 
ence on Linguistic Method, Aug. 1-3, 
at the University of California at Los 
Angeles. Sponsor; Air Force Office of 
Scientific Research. Contact: R. W. 
Swaiison (SRI), Air Force Ofilce of 
Scientific Research, Washington, D. C. 
20333, (Area Code 202) OXford 
G-5374. 

Eleventh Internationa] Symposium 
on Combustion, Aug. 14-20, at the 
University of California, Berkeley, 
Calif, Co-sponsors: Ballistic Research 
Laboratory and the Combustion Insti- 
tute of Pittsburgh, Pa. Contact; Dr. 
R. J. Heaston, Physical Sciences Div. 
Army Research Office, 3045 Columbia 
Pike, Arlington, Va., (Area Code 
202) OXford 4-3465. 

Second Computer & Information 
Sciences Symposium on Learning, 
Adaptation and Control in Informa- 
tion Systems, Aug. 22-24, at Colum- 
bus, Ohio. Sponsors: Office of Naval 
Research, Battelle Memorial Institute 
and Ohio State University. Contact: 
Julius T. Tou, COINS Co-Chairman, 
Director, Communications Science Re- 
search Center, Battelle Memorial In- 
stitute, Columbus, Ohio 43201. 

( Application of Generalized Func- 
tions to System Theory Conference, 

Aug. 25-2G, at the State University of 
New York, Stony Brook, N. Y. Co- 
sponsors: Air Force Office of Sci- 
entific Research and Society for In- 
dustrial and Applied Mathematics, 
Contact: Capt. John Jones, Jr. 
(SRMA), Air Force Office of Scien- 
tific Research, Washington, D. C. 
20333, (Area Code 202) OXford 
6-1302. 

Un guided Rocket Ballistics Sym- 
posium, Aug. 30-Scpt. 1, at Texas 
Western College, El Paso, Tex. Spon- 
sor; Army Electronics Research & 
Development Agency. Contact: V. C, 
Cochran, Army Electronics Research 
& Development Agency, White Sands 
Missile Range, N.M., 88002. 

SEPTEMBER 

U. S. National Committee for Pure 
and Applied Biophysics in connection 
with Second International Biophysics 
Congress, Sept. 5-9, in Vienna, Aus- 
tria. Sponsors; Office of Naval Re- 
search and National Academy of Sci- 
ences-National Research Council. Con- 
tact: Mrs, P. H. Tenniswood (Code 



444) Office of Naval Ucaeweh, WV- 
ington, D. C. 203(50. (Area Code r ?l- 
OXford 6-1538. 

Twelfth Annual .Seminar of ; 
American Society for Industrials* 
curity, Sept. 20-22, at Shtmton Ih-. 
Philadelphia, PEL. Sponsor: Am ?!: 
Society for Industrial Security. Co 
tact: J. L, Graves, Public Kebi!:?; 
Chairman, P. O, Hux 8117, l"& 
dolphin, 1'a. 19101, (Ami Cod* ! 
82H-H747. 

Symposium on ({iislrninlrstinal Jl: 
dial ion Injury, Hnpt. H/i-ftl, at R; 
land, Wafih. Co-sponsor*: U. S 
Atomic Energy Commission an-:! IV 
tdle-NnrthwcHl. Cniitiu-t: Dr. MM:** 
P. Sullivan, Itiolouy Dt'irt., \\i['.& 
Northwest,, P. O. Hox W, IKrh'i-: 
Wash. 00352. 

Symposium oil (ijilio-iMmlnirh, &:- 
2(5-27, at Wales and KiiuliimL ;' 
spr; Research uml 'IVHundKy D'" 
sion, Air Forco KyHlrmn f'omr.ur: 
Contact: U. W. Hunm-lto IAVN), \\ 
Eorcc Avionics Labomlory, lk : ^.". 
and Technology Div., Air 1'oive Sr ; 
turns Command, WriKlit-l'^lcir^ K 
Force BUHR, Ohin 'Ifi-IHH, (Aiva : 
51S) 259-7111, xL. MIMM. 

Sixth Annual Nalional Conferva- 
on Environmental KlTt'cU on Aim* 1 
and Propulsion .Synlt]iiH f Hqrt. &-? 
at the Nassau Tun, Prmnlmi, N. Ji 
Sponsor: U. S. Nuval Air Turi-V 
Test Station. Oonlucl: Dfrr's H 
WysoeUi, Conforiniri! Vife-Chaim: 
U. S. Naval Air Turtihm VrsL Sta^E 
P, 0. liox 171(i, 1410 I'lirlway Af. 
Tronton, N. J, OK(i(l7, (Art* C*i 
(JOif) 8H2-1-1M, ext. .'irir.. 

Sixth Symposium on Nnval Wyfa 
(lynninics, MaiK'iivcrnhiLity, Vti 1 ?. 
and Physics of Fluid*, Sept. l 1 -^ 
Oct. .'i-4, at tli SlnlltM- Ililt-n lf:-: ; 
Washington, I). C. Snou^r: n.%:# ^ 
Naval Research, Omlact: S. *' 
DorofT or P. C!ranvill-, H(rlc? :' 
Naval Research, Coclr -1J38. IT. S Cv 
partmont of the; Navy, WnVhir^--. 
I). C. 203fiO, (Area dull! 202) OXf:- 
6-1433 or OXfoi-d fi~fi8S9, . 



AOA Annual 

Meeting Scheduled 

The 48th Anminl IX-frns* Fi> 
parcdnesfl Meeting of t!^ An'fti-:^ 
Ordnance AHsocintion will \f btes 
Los Angeles and at Kdwrtnl* AH 
Calif., on October fi-H, 19M. Ta 
U. S. Air Force ia the lio.^t Milili? 
Service at this year's inrrtinff. 

The meeting: ia IeHiRiie<J lo ftc-vi-i 
an opportunity for Air I'OKO iff-:* 1 
sentatives to discUHH "MilitatT A'-'i 
craft of the Future" bofore an a-::> 
once of rcpreaentntivoa from tj 
aircraft and related indtuliiu i:J 
to allow these rcprcscntalivi's tj s-.t 
the newest aircraft of tlie Ait rfT-* 
in hoth static and aerial (Hsplaj^ 




Address by Mr, James W. Roach, 
Asst, Dir. (Engineering Manage- 
ment), Office of Dir. of Defense Re- 
search & Enginering, at the DOD 
Advanced Planning Briefings for In- 
dustry, San Francisco, Calif., April 
12, 1966. 




James W. Roach 

Management Trends 
in Defense R&D 

Research and development is a 
major Defense program. Through this 
program the DOD obtains the weap- 
ons and systems needed by the Mili- 
tary Services, as well as the technol- 
ogy and building blocks these major 
systems depend upon. 

Obviously a program that costs $7 
billion a year, and has more than 100 
major projects important to national 
defense, demands and receives contin- 
uing management attention. Part of 
that attention is to assure that the 
policies we establish and use fit well 
with the practical business of develop- 
ing and producing hardware. I will 
talk to you about that part of our 
management review that may result 
in some modification of current poli- 
cies. Some of these possible changes 



in policies could affect the way you 
do business with the DOD. 

Some of tho policy changes we are 
considering aim at preventing future 
problems. Others relate quite directly 
to our day-to-day activities. I will de- 
scribe both kinds of problems and the 
actions we arc taking to solve them. 
These actions, when analyzed and re- 
lated to each other, provide insight 
to the management trends in Defense 
K&D. 

Like our counterparts in industry, 
we have a continuing need to improve 
how the top R&D echelon or corpo- 
rate level manages the efforts of 
subordinate activities. This problem 
extends through all levels of Defense 
R&D management, but I think you 
will be most interested in two specific 
and closely related parts of the 
problem : 

The management of the Defense 
in-house R&D activity. 

The management of the R&D ef- 
fort provided by industry. A separate, 
more general problem is how to im- 
prove the R&D response to short- 
range user needs, such as those aris- 
ing in Vietnam. 

Considering your interests, I will 
amplify two of the problems: "Man- 
agement of Contract R&D" and "Re- 
sponse to Vietnam." However, to set 
the stage I will first describe certain 
actions being taken to solve part of 
the problem of "Management by Top 
R&D Echelons." These actions can 
be summarized as better expression 
of intent in three areas: 

Improved definition of the job to 
be done. 

More effective selection of the 
optimum contractor, 

Improved control of the defined 
contract. 

Improved definition of the job has. 
been emphasized by contract definition 
preceded by concept formulation. This 
policy was released by DOD Directive 
3200,9. Concept formulation is the 
process for answering; the necessary 
questions regarding: alternate opera- 
tional approaches and alternate tech- 
nical solutions, as well as the cost and 
operational effectiveness of these ap- 
proaches and solutions. Concept form- 



J 



illation is the basis for the prime man- 
agement decision should the project 
enter engineering development, con- 
sidering that the objective of engi- 
neering development is development 
with strong intent for deploying to 
operational inventory? This is a key 
decision, with significant military and 
resources implications. Therefore, the 
concept formulation must be compre- 
hensive and searching, yet very 
timely. 

Contract definition is both the vali- 
dation action and the action required 
for precise definition of the contract. 
Contract definition does not mean the 
over-definition of the details of the 
system to he developed but rather the 
precise definition of the performance 
of the system and the contract to 
achieve that performance. 

To date, 14 major projects have 
passed through some type of contract 
definition: five Air Force projects, six 
Navy, and three Army. These projects 
include such systems as Titan III, 
Lance, MACS, IHAS and ILAAS, 
Mark 48 Torpedo, C-5A, AAFSS and 
Poseidon. Not all of these contract 
definitions have gone smoothly nor 
have all. achieved the objectives estab- 
lished for contract definition. We have 
learned that the concept is good but 
occasionally the implementation is 
lacking. Our future action will be di- 
rected toward improving the imple- 
mentation. Currently, contract defini- 
tion is planned for FDL, Mark II 
Avionics and SAM-D. 

More effective contractor selection 
follows logically from tho contract 
definition effort. Contract definition 
attempts to give the competitors the 
best possible avenue for "displaying 
their wares." Our source selection 
policy, released in DOD Directive 
4105.62, attempts to establish the best 
possible climate for judging the con- 
tractors' "wares" against DOD needs. 
The source selection policy brings in 
all affected parties to the decision 
developer, user, logistician, financier; 
the policy provides checks and bal- 
ances through both specialist and gen- 
eralist participation. 

Several of the projects which have 
gone through contract definition have 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



11 



also utilized the recently-released 
source selection policy. Particularly 
satisfying have been the source selec- 
tion efforts of the Navy's Condor and 
Walleye, the Army's AAFSS urn) the 
Air Force's C-5A. 

Following contractor .selection, we 
all need to exercise improved control 
of the defined job. Key to tiiis control 
is the control exercised by the con- 
tractor through the high motivation 
contract negotiated as an output of 
contract definition, To supplement, but 
not constrain the contractor, the DOD 
is developing a revised policy on con- 
figuration management and on the 
performance measurement system to 
he used to monitor the development 
and production effort. Configuration 
management is a discipline being de- 
veloped to strike the proper balance 
between the latitude necessary to the 
developing contractor anil the needs of 
the DOD Tor precise definition of the 
configuration. We are attempting to 
balance these apparently conflicting 
needs by a gradual increase in the 
details of configuration definition as 
the design effort progresses. 

Let's turn to an analysis of the 
management of contract R&D. For 
the past few years, emphasis has been 
placed on contracting for development 
by means of performance specifica- 
tions, This may be through the use of 
system performance specifications or 
performance specifications for the 
major elements of the system, or 
through a combination. Here again 
we must exercise caution. There is a 
natural tendency to specify design 
details of the system elements, thereby 
destroying design latitude, In addi- 
tion, certain other techniques such as 
pre-contract detailing of the func- 
tional requirements of each element 
may defeat the objectives of contract- 
ing by overall performance specifica- 
tions. 

Configuration management fortifies 
the performance specification concept 
for development. As presently con- 
ceived, it utilizes a progressively 
more detailed definition of configura- 
tion as design and test proceeds, 
Control of the configuration at any 
point in time will be exercised against 
the configuration identification devel- 
oped to that point. 

Our current revision efforts on 
CITE (Contractor Independent Tech- 
nical Effort) have, as a prime objec- 
tive, improved capabilities from con- 
tractor independent R&D. This objec- 



tive will be achieved through in- 
creased contractor latitude to select 
those CITE projects which will en- 
hance his own R&D efforts and, 
therefore, his responsiveness to DOD. 
These CITE projects may range (at 
the contractor's discretion) from in- 
dependent research efforts through de- 
velopment to bidding and proposed 
efforts on a solicited or unsolicited 
basis. We hope to foster this latitude 
by providing a more equitable means 
of negotiating a reasonable ceiling for 
total CITE funds within which the 
contractor may exercise his manage- 
ment judgment on project selection. 

The Weighted Guidelines for Profit 
Determination is an action which 
tends to improve the management of 
Defense acquisition by rewarding high 
contract performance and conversely 
penalizing for poor performance. Re- 
sults to date indicate a significant in- 
crease in as-negotiated profit rates. 
Using a base period of 1059 through 
1963, significant increases have oc- 
curred in as-negrotiated profit rates 
for 1964 and 1965. It is too early to 
have statistically significant facts on 
realized profit either as a percentage 
of sales or as a percentage of invest- 
ment. Similarly, it is too early to de- 
termine whether DOD is getting im- 
proved performance for these in- 
creased, as-negotiated profit rates. 
However, close attention is continuing 
on the profit rate picture. 

I mentioned earlier that the key 
to improved management of contract 
R&D is the motivation provided by a 
well-defined contract with the proper 
incentives built in. DOD actions to 
achieve well-defined contracts with 
proper incentives arc well known. 
There have been some successes and 
there have been some failures. We 
continue to press for better imple- 
mentation of the incentive concept. 
More than half of our engineering 1 
and operational systems developments 
utilize some form of incentive con- 
tracts. Lesser use is appropriate and 
evident in the less clearly defined ef- 
fort that takes place in the earlier 
development categories and in re- 
search. 

A recent problem concerns team ar- 
rangements made for the proposal 
effort and the development of a par- 
ticular project. Certain actions by 
DOD have been interpreted as a pol- 
icy change against team arrange- 
ments. This problem has been brought 
to the attention of the top manage- 



ment levels in the OSD and in the 
Services. It appears that a policy 
statement is needed that would recog- 
nize the validity and desirability of 
team arrangements, and would estab- 
lish the general rule that team ar- 
rangements will be honored subject 
to the DOD right to direct specific 
substitution of a team member for 
a specific, substantive reason. 

The Total Package Procurement 
concept is being tested on three major 
projects: the C-5A, the FDL Trans- 
port and SRAM. I would like to use 
the concept as an illustration of an 
improvement in the management of 
contract R&D. There arc many who 
feel that the follow-on production of 
a project is a greater motivation for 
improved performance than are higher 
profit rates in development. I believe 
there arc many motivations, and total 
package should stimulate the follow- 
on production motivation as weighted 
guidelines attempts to stimulate the 
reputation or image-motivation. 

Another action under way to im- 
prove management of contract R&D 
is the development of CWAS, Con- 
tractor Weighted Average Share of 
Cost Risk. It is appropriate to point 
out that CWAS implementation 
should have a beneficial result on con- 
tract R&D management because of its 
promise of increased contractor man- 
agement latitude via the operation of 
a highly motivating 1 , cost risk envi- 
ronment. 

Turning to the second problem area 
R&D response to Vietnam there 
are those who have expressed the con- 
cern that programming, contract defi- 
nition, etc., may drastically constrain 
the response rate of R&D to short 
term user needs such as those of Viet- 
nam. This is a concern of R&D man- 
agement and several actions have 
been taken to increase the timeliness 
and effectiveness of R&D response. 
Most of these actions have been di- 
rected toward accelerating 1 our cur- 
rent .development concepts rather 
than starting a totally new manage- 
ment system for quick-reaction (level-. 
ments. | 

A closer tie in of the user's need 
and the R&D agency's proposed solu- 
tion has been required for some time, 
On the larger, longer-term projects, 
the requirements of concept formula* 
tion and contract definition provide 
this needed link. For the short term 
needs, special arrangements are in us 



12 



July 1966 



to provide a quick-response interface 
between user needs and R&D pro- 
posed solutions. 

Since 1964 there has been a Viet; 
nam Joint Research and Test Activ- 
ity (JRATA) established by the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff and the Director of 
Defense Research and Engineering. 
Its mission is to test and evaluate 
the combat potential of any new 
equipment. JRATA operates under the 
direction of Brigadier General John 
Boles who reports to General West- 
moreland. General Boles' oi-gani nation 
is making major contributions to our 
operational capability in evaluation of 
new hardware and particularly in op- 
erational employment studies of such 
equipment. An example of the latter 
is a recent effort by the Army ele- 
ment of JRATA which recommended 
a change in the Vietnamese artillery 
doctrine and increased its effective- 
ness by several times. , . . 

This past year, General Westmore- 
land established a section within the 
MACV Command whose sole respon- 
sibility is to obtain from field com- 
manders expressions of their urgent 
needs. There is a direct link from 
MACV to the Service R&D organi- 
zations, The Vietnam -need statements 
receive first priority over all other 
longer-term requirements. The Serv- 
ices have established streamlined pro- 
cedures for processing and develop- 
ing solutions to these needs. A reg- 
ular exchange of information on re- 
quirements and their resultant R&D 
projects has been established. Four 
joint Service/ARPA technical teams 
(Mobility, Communications, Surveil- 
lance and Weapons) have visited Viet- 
nam repeatedly for detailed analysis 
and evaluation. Last summer, MACV 
identified many problem areas. All 
have been reviewed to determine 
means of satisfying these needs. 
There are many projects, most of 
them previously in existence, aimed at 
satisfying these problem areas. We 
estimate that about 75 percent of 
these R&D problem areas will be sat- 
isfied by some item in operation by 
January 1967. 

Coupled with these improvements in 
the requirements identification proc- 
ess and in the evaluation activity, 
there have been similar improvements 
in the R&D organizations improve- 
ments which serve to increase the 
response rate. Two examples of im- 
proved R&D organizations are the 
Army's Limited War Laboratory in 



Aberdeen and the Air Force's Special 

Air Warfare Center at Eglin. 

The war in Vietnam has many 
facets, varying from counter-insur- 
gency against terrorists in the vil- 
lages to combat against the organized 
regular army units from North Viet- 
nam. There is an almost infinite vari- 
ety of equipment required. Many ex- 
amples can be mentioned ranging 
from the normal developments accel- 
erated for Vietnam, such as the light- 
weight AR15 or Ml 6 rifle and the 
M79 40mm grenade launcher, to the 
quick-response developments like the 
improved jungle boot. . . . 

The Aberdeen Limited War Labora- 
tory had been conducting some pre- 
liminary investigation of armor 
plating of commercial vehicles. In 
November 1964 the laboratory re- 
ceived a request from Vietnam for 
Armor Kits for the Scout vehicles 
(protection for the driver and pas- 



senger from small arms fire and mine 
fragments), The lab delivered 12 kits 
to Vietnam in June 1965, seven months 
after the initial request. . . . 

This streamlined system for meet- 
ing the short-term needs is not yet 
complete. We are taking steps to im- 
prove further our communications 
with Vietnam to keep abreast of their 
problems and to tell them of our 
progress. In addition, wo must mar- 
shal more of the potential contribu- 
tion of the Defense R&D community. 

These remarks on actions taken to 
solve R&D problems illustrate the 
management trends in Defense R&D. 
I can summarize these trends into 
three terse statements: 

Improved techniques for internal 
DOD development management. 

Increased contractor latitude when 
coupled with increased motivation. 

Improved response to short-range 
user needs. 



Education and Training 

(Continued from page 8) 
each year, this research task is a 
mammoth undertaking. We need to 
start this program by perfecting the 
techniques for such assessments, 

Second, we must seek ways to 
communicate the necessary knowledge 
and skill to each student in the opti- 
mum period of time -neither too 
much nor too little. Wo believes it may 
be possible to reduce training time in 
many courses. A key technique is to 
give each individual in technical train- 
ing a chance to proceed at his own 
pace. Use of this approach will re- 
quire much greater automation and 
more sophisticated engineering tech- 
niques. 

Third, we need to expose more of 
our people to more information on an 
"as needed" basis. With devices for 
information storage and retrieval, 
random IVCCCHS and high speed com- 
munications, it seems to us that the 
time is fast approaching when knowl- 
edge can bo more widely and immedi- 
ately accessible both for classroom 
training and for use on the job, thus 
minimizing the amount of knowledge 
which must be gained in the classroom 
itself, 

Fourth, we need to raise the stand- 
ards in instruction to the highest level 
of quality and effectiveness by the use 
of pre-recorded instruction flowing 
from the beat teachers and the best 
materials communicated by tape, 
film, television, computers and other 



devices to students at multiple loca- 
tions. 

Fifth, \vn need to apply planning 
and quality control techniques with 
rapid feedback to our teachers from 
on-tho-joh performance. Our quality 
controls should be comparable in pre- 
cision to the techniques employed in 
the production of today's most sophis- 
ticated aerospace systems. 

Thesfl are our objectives. We solicit 
the assistance of industry in engi- 
neering systems to achieve them. 

In discussing the design of a truly 
creative partnership between Govern- 
ment and industry before a group of 
leading 1 businessmen last May, Presi- 
dent Johnson stated ; 

"There are numerous cases 
where the technology is already at 
hand but is awaiting a demonstra- 
tion of its practicality and the 
creation of a market. One con- 
tribution the Federal Government 
can make is in helping to over- 
come the reluctance to accept 
promising innovations by making 
possible their demonstration and 
evaluation." 

This is the basis for our partner- 
ship approach with industry. The De- 
fense Department seeks the assistance 
of industry in improving the effec- 
tiveness of our fighting forces. In 
turn, we in the Defense Department 
are anxious to provide industry the 
opportunity to innovate in this en- 
deavor. And the nation on the whole 
will benefit. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



13 




Lt. Gen. W. A. Davis, USAP 
Vice Commander, Air Force Systems Command 



Integrated circuits are built by a 
specific diffusion construction tech- 
nique which generally starts with 
the basic ingredient of ultra-pure 
silicon. Certain "impurities" with 
specific characteristics are added in 
controlled amounts and the mixture 
is grown into a material which, when 
properly excited, will perform a basic 
electronic function. 

A dozen or more of the functions, 
or circuits, may be incorporated into 
a silicon flake chip no larger than 
the head of a pin. Up to GOO circuits 
can be placed in an area no larger 
than the eraser at the end of a pen- 
cil. One of these chips can perform 
the same work which would require 
a large number of electron tubes or 
transistors and perform it more 
reliably. 

Floyd E. Wenger, a pioneer in 
the field of microelectronics who 
served as reliability assistant in the 
Systems Effectiveness Division of the 
Air Force Systems Command, com- 



pares the now technology with tk 
technique usud by a housewife when 
she takes various raw ingredients, 
mixes them in a ratio and processes 
them in a certain manner to product 
a cake. 

The housewife does not Imvc to 
worry too much about the amount of 
impurities in the materials. This is 
not true, however, in the processing 
of integrated circuits. The mat emit 
used must bo refined and purified un- 
til there is leas than one part of im- 
purity or contamination in a billion 
parts of the material. 

The room in which the chips are 
grown and processed must be surgic- 
ally clean. Any contamination upsets 
the chemical material balance end 
degrades the operational capability 
and reliability of the devices* 

Since the active, transistor-like 
function and the other circuit com- 
ponents are an integral part of tlie 
chip, and in a homogeneous mass, tlie 
reliability of the chip becomes tho 
reliability of the various materinls 
used in the process and the extreme- 
ly precise processing techniques in- 
volved in their manufacture. A great 
benefit of this new technology is thai 
external connections, which are n 
great cause of unreliability and in- 
creased weight in circuitry employ- 
ing conventional tubes, trail si slxm, 
resistors and capacitors, arc largely 



The new technology of microelec- 
tronics promises to change greatly 
the living patterns of future genera- 
tions of Americans. Some of these 
changes are already beginning to in- 
fluence the lives of many people to- 
day. 

The tremendous progress of this 
new technology is a result of the na- 
tion's need to meet the complex elec- 
tronic demands for advanced ballistic 
missile and space systems and avi- 
onics equipment. Indications are 
that the peaceful benefits of micro- 
electronics may, in time, far out-dis- 
tance its military applications. 

Civilian benefits from this type of 
space-age research are virtually un- 
limited. Use of microelectronics in 
the home of tomorrow will include 
temperature-sensitive ovens that will 
cook a roast or bake a cake perfectly 
every time; and air conditioning and 
heating systems that will analyze 
the temperature and humidity at 
several points in a home to keep the 
rooms at a constant, desired level. 
High-volume home-entertainment cir- 
cuitry is on the visible horizon, with 
the major channel of news, informa- 
tion and entertainment incorporated 
in a single integrated system and 
with a high-speed electronic printer 
for recording any information the 
viewer wishes to retain, 

Applications in other areas may 
include wristwatch radios and TV 
sets, invisible hearing aids and desk- 
top computers. Pocket-size radio tel- 
ephones may become commonplace in 
the not-too-distant future. 

Microelectronics is a general term 
to describe a number of approaches 
for increasing reliability, while de- 
creasing the weight and size of elec- 
tronic equipment. In one, the compo- 
nents are diffused or grown into a 
silicon flake known as a "chip,"an'd 
in another a thin film process is used 
for layering the components on the 
silicon chip. Microelectronics differs 
from microminiaturization in that 
the latter simply reduces the size of 
electronic components, while micro- . . . ,. 

electronics utilizes several new terh This microcircuit equivalent of a six-transistor radio fits in the eye of a sowing 

nioues of cironlfe needlc ' New combinations of materials-single crystal silicon on sapphire aro 

1 used to provide the required electrical isolation within the small area available; 




14 



July 1966 



eliminated by the integrated circuit. 

Wenger is convinced that integrat- 
ed circuit technology is a natural for 
use in the construction of 'digital, or 
counting-type circuits, such as those 
used in many computers and control 
devices. It lends itself to mass pro- 
duction; and the cost of chips con- 
taining from ten to fifty different 
electronic circuits is only slightly 
higher than the cost for single cir- 
cuit devices. 

Analogue, or measuring circuits, are 
not as far advanced from the appli- 
cation standpoint as the digital de- 
vices, hut a rosy future is predicted 
for their ultimate use. 

It is forecast that the majority 
of commercial computers and busi- 
ness machines will be using integra- 
ted circuits within a three-year period. 

Calculator and adding machine 
companies are presently evaluating 
their practical applications. Their 
superiority will make them candi- 
dates for all types of instrumenta- 
tion, 'data processing systems and 
machine equipment control, which in- 
volves programming a machine to 
handle a complete manufacturing or 
other process by electronic means. 

Air Force involvement in micro- 
electronics, which started Govern- 



ment/industry research in this new 
technology, came about through the 
development of highly sophisticated 
weapon systems. 

By the mid-1950's, fche space and 
global operations of .the Air Force 
had become highly dependent upon 
electronic aids, These devices, built 
with techniques borrowed by the 
early radio pioneers from the electri- 
cal industry, were growing larger, 
heavier and more complex. At the 
same time they were becoming less 
reliable. This led to tremendous 
maintenance and logistic support 
problems. 

It was at this critical period that 
the concept of microelectronic cir- 
cuits emerged and was grasped by 
the Air Research and Development 
Command, predecessor of today's 
Air Force Systems Command, as a 
highly promising solution to the 
mounting problems. 

The concept of molecular elec- 
tronics, which is the use of a single 
block of material to perform the 
function of an entire circuit, came 
into being. This concept was pro- 
posed to industry by the Air Force 
and a contract was awarded for its 
exploitation in 1959. This stimulated 
an explosion of industry effort and 
resulted in the silicon integrated cir- 
cuit. 




Ultra-miniaturization is only a 
happy by-product of the new elec- 
tronics, with reliability its main ad- 
vantage. The guidance systems of the 
Minuteman II ICBM have proven the 
advantage of microelectronics, with a 
50 percent weight reduction, an in- 
creased reliability factor of ten and 
a resulting decrease in maintenance 
costs. 

The best data on transistors used 
in the first Minuteman missile sys- 
tem indicated failures on the order 
of one every 100,000 hours. Exten- 
sive life tests of the new integrated 
circuits indicate a failure rate of less 
than one every 20 million hours. 

Experts indicate the life of elec- 
tronics in a system will bo as long 
or longer than many of the systems 
which contain them. If they can pre- 
dict the failures, spares can be sent 
along with the new equipment. Self- 
identifying fault detectors can be 
built into the system to instantly rec- 
ognize troubles, thereby lowering 
maintenance costs. 

Beyond the measurable benefits are 
broader implications relating to oper- 
ational system effectiveness. It is 
hard to attacli a value to decreases 
in the "down time" of military air- 
craft or to the maintenance of ballis- 
tic missiles and bombers because 
force readiness an'd the maintenance 
of a specified force level are difficult 
to "cost." Microelectronics will give 
added performance efficiency and ef- 
fectiveness to weapons capabilities. 

The demonstrated success of inte- 
grated circuits in the Minutcmaii 
and other prog-ranis has led the Air 
Force to consider them for much 
wider applications. Consequently, the 
Air Force Systems Command is urg- 
ing the maximum practical applica- 
tion of microelectronic devices in all 
new system and equipment designs, 
as well as for product improvement 
in existing equipment. 



The AN/ARC-63 communications receiver was the first non-digital equipment 
to make extensive use of integrated circuits with a resulting 35 to 1 reduction 
in size and weight over a comparable transistor version of the same receiver. 



A report covering the develop- 
ment, growth a-nd future of mi- 
droelectronics has been published 
in booklet form by the Air Force 
Systems Command, It is titled, 
"Integrated Circuits Come of 
Age," and is available to industry 
representatives without charge. 

Requests for copies should he 
sent to Air Force Systems Com- 
mand, Attii. SCEP, Andrews 
AFB, Washington, D. C. 20331. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



15 



However, the three forms of study 
discussed here are conducted formally 
or informally to assure that pertinent 
factors are weighed into a decision. If 
these studies are too informal or 
superficial, or should be interfered 
with by organizational, bureaucratic, 
or procedural rigidity, or are se- 
qucnced improperly, the system will 
fault, and the proposal will suffer as 
a consequence. The sequence of these 
studies is not always predictable but 
generally tends to follow that given. 
The requirements-definition dialogue 
initiates activity; cost-effectiveness 
analyses generally come into play at 
an appropriate time after the dia- 
logue has matured sufficiently; finally, 



technical cost tradeoffs phase into the 

activity. 

R&D Effectiveness Quantification. 

But to repeat our earlier question; 
When is the appropriate time for the 
application of cost effectiveness test- 
ing? And under what conditions can 
cost and effectiveness be tested con- 
structively? We are now back to the 
original issue, namely, "Can the ef- 
fectiveness of R&D he measured?" 
The answer to this question supplied 
at the beginning of this article was, 
"It depends." 

It depends, as stated earlier, on the 
three characteristics of the materiel, 
namely: 

The conceptual maturity. 



EFFECTIVENESS CREDIBILITY 

vs 
CONCEPTUAL MATURITY 



IllVi HIM 

OKtATIOhML GfMlUIIOJI 

WAtlLITV MMiHIEL 
MMMIEl 

CONCEPTUAL MATURI1Y 



MODIFICATION 

Of EXISTING 

MAT! I lfL 



Figure 6. 



EFFECTIVENESS CREDIBILITY 

vs 
DEVELOPMENTAL MATURITY 



DEVEIOPMIMTM MATUCITY 



Figure 7. 



16 



The developmental maturity, 
The degree of operational uncer- 
tainty. 

Let's examine these characteristics 
in greater detail. Figure G is a quali- 
tative representation of the relation- 
ship between the probability that the 
analyst can develop credible quantifi- 
cation of effectiveness against the con- 
ceptual maturity of the materiel, You 
will note that the probability of cred- 
ible quantification increases as the 
character of the materiel moves away 
from the innovation environment to- 
ward the more mature and more 
quantifiable environment of next gen- 
eration or existing* materiel, This 
chart is strictly qualitative, intended 
simply to delineate the character of 
the relationship. The curve is prob- 
ably not a straight line, -for example, 
but this is incidental. You will recall 
from the foregoing- that care must bo 
exorcised to protect innovative op- 
erational and technological concents 
against premature effectiveness ami 
cost inhibition. If indeed credible 
quantifications of effectiveness arc 
hard to come by, for materiel con- 
cerned with innovational concepts or 
new operational capability, the prob- 
ability of error is more likely in any 
derivative analysis than when effec- 
tiveness testing is concerned with ma- 
teriel more conceptually mature. 

Strong inference applied to the re- 
quirements definition process will con- 
firm the validity of this relationship, 
so let's move on to the next charac- 
teristic of evolving materiel, namely, 
the developmental maturity. 

Charted in Figure 7 is the relation- 
ship between probability of credible 
effectiveness quantification and tlic 
developmental maturity of materiel. 
Requirements definition aft'ain sup- 
ports the validity of this qualitative 
relationship, namely, that there is a 
higher degree of uncertainty in ef- 
fectiveness quantification prior to en- 
gineering' for end use and that ef- 
fectiveness quantification is more 
readily and credibly developed after 
the materiel is engineered with the 
objective of operational inventory. 
Again the definitive slope of the curve 
is incidental for our purposes. 

Finally, let's examine the last char- 
acteristic of R&D materiel, i.e., the 
degree of operational uncertainty im- 
plicit in the genesis of the proposed 
materiel. Operational uncertainty is 
complex and intractable. To a great 
extent, this derives from the fact tlmt 
the credibility of effectiveness quanti- 
fications is determined by the degree 
to which the component factors that 
make up these numbers can be con- 
trolled. And operational uncertainty 
is not readily amenable to control, 

July 1966 



Let's go back for a moment to the 
** problem monger and solution monger 
concept. But first let me recount a 
story that was used by a senior cost 
effectiveness analyst during a pre- 
sentation on the utility of cost effec- 
tiveness in R&D. The analyst de- 
scribed a recipe he had seen for 
hassenpfeffer that was contained in 
a 10th century cookbook. The recipe 
opened with the inexorable logic 
"First, catch a hare," Ohviously, this 
is the first step. The analyst argued, 
nevertheless, that this was not the 
first step but a derivative of the 
earlier requirement, namely, the nec- 
essity of first getting the recipe to 
J tell you to catch a hare. The analyst 
drew the analogy that, while it might 
appear that the obvious first require- 
ment for cost effectiveness studies is 
to have something needing effective- 
ness measurement and costing, in 
reality that is not first, According to 
him, first there must exist the prob- 
lem of choice. And to have a choice 
challenge, there must be alternatives, 
The analyst stopped at this point, 
having illustrated his position. How- 
over, let's examine the sufficiency of 
this position in the case of combat 
materiel for a moment. If we can 
agree that effectiveness measurement 
\ is concerned with the various alterna- 
tive solutions to a problem operating 
in the intended environment, then it 
appears that the analyst is missing 
a point. While the cost clement of his 
analyses is concerned with the alter- 
native solutions, the effectiveness ele- 
ment is concerned with both solution 
and the operational problem that 
stimulated the generation of the solu- 
tion alternative. This must be so, if 
we intend to measure the effectiveness 
of the solution "in its intended en- 
vironment," since the intended en- 
vironment of combat materiel in- 
cludes the very problem, or threat, 
that initiated the whole exercise. This 
consideration is always involved in 
the credibility of effectiveness quanti- 
fications for materiel destined for 
combat interaction. 

Let's test this consideration. Here 
is a definition of cost effectiveness 
that appeared in a paper in the jour- 
nal of the Operations Research So- 
ciety of America: 

"Cost effectiveness analysis is 
an analytical technique for evalu- 
ating the broad management and 
economic implications of alterna- 
tive choices of action, with the 
objective of assisting in the iden- 
tification of the preferred choice." 
a* Note the words "alternative choices 
of action" and "preferred choice." 
Choices of action are solutions to 
some problem stimulus. But what is 
the problem requiring solution? The, 
problem is to counter a threat, and 



there are two kinds of threats the 
threats associated with combat inter- 
action and threats implicit in the sup- 
port of combat forces that are in- 
tended for direct combat interaction. 
Materiel developed to counter those 
threats implicit in non-combat support 
operations tends to be susceptible to 
methodological treatment and effec- 
tiveness quantification. On the other 
hand, materiel intended as a solution 
to the threats of direct combat inter- 
action presents a monumental chal- 
lenge to the quantifying analyst, 
especially considering the man/ma- 
chine involvements and the indeter- 
minacy of the conflict environment. 

The tendency to evade the issue of 
operational uncertainty is obvious in 
the literature. A publication with a 
chapter on the rudiments of model 
building contained the following state- 
ment, quoted out of context; 

"The enemy's reaction and his 
shift in defense weapons and 
tactics as we change our offense 
vehicles may be quantifiable in 
principal, but a formidable prob- 
lem in practice one that is often 
passed over in silence. Mixed 
forces and time-phasing may be 
left out of the model because of 
the computational difficulties they 
introduce." ' 

The temptation to "suppress" oper- 
ational uncertainty is great. Rut sup- 
pression of the basic pivotal factor, 
that brought the proposed materiel 
under consideration in the first place, 
would appear to be specious logic that 
can result in academic findings, or an 
erroneous series of findings that could 



well destroy important incipient new 
weapons. 

' "Analysis for Military Decisions," 
E. S. Qtiade, i>. f>9. 

Let's turn now to Figure 8 which 
sets forth the relationship between the 
probability of credible quantifications 
and the maturity of materiel intended 
for operation in the differing environ- 
ments just mentioned. For materiel 
intended to operate in a scenario of 
lower operational uncertainty, labeled 
on the chart "combat interaction 
none," the rate of increase of credible 
quantifications with evolutional ma- 
turity is quite high. In other words, 
this category of materiel during en- 
gineering development can probably 
lie measured for effectiveness with 
reasonably high credibility. 

Examples of this category of mate- 
riel might be the C-5A heavy logistics 
aircraft and possibly the Fast De- 
ployment Logistic Ship. This materiel 
is generally not intended to close with 
the enemy in combat and the uncer- 
tainty that he represents does not as 
a rule perturb the environment that 
is of concern in effectiveness measure- 
ment. On the other hand, materiel 
which is intended for close interaction 
with the threat in combat, depicted 
by the curve labeled "combat inter- 
action total" presents a high entropy 
challenge, poorly adapted to credible 
measurement because of the high de- 
gree of operational uncertainty, This 
is true throughout the developmental 
life cycle until use-disciplined employ- 
ment doctrine is generated, either 
through field exercises or actual com- 
bat use. Examples of this type of 
materiel, generally tactical in nature, 



EFFECTIVENESS CREDIBILITY 
vs 



EVOLUTION 



MATURITY 



DOME OF INTERACTION 
WITH THE THREAT IN COMBAT 



IFftCllvlHCH 




SIAOE OF MATURITY OF MATERIEI 



AD 1 PIP ) ODDUt 



Figure 8. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



17 



mitfht lx> llii! SAM I) or liii'lindlv ji'ani.'nn, or i'mm tin- rio-d I'm 1 crriih- 

roMfLKUtvd V/.STOI, aihTal'l. Tin 1 pn>li<'i,'nry, ran In 1 rimnimu ., A mn. 

middliMiurvi! ri'couni/.i's lliat the nun* scrimi;: rvi-nluiilily run n-:-idt if i!n 

hat inli'radiori Hpeelnim i; ..... nliiumiis mmi';; hc;;t rM'nrl:. raimM rh, .. ih. 

iinil that miitond rxi.'ihi thill will up- ,)|irnilhijial f,jip hH \\rrn lii m:il. n.- 

<;nit<> Ill varying mist-;; of llic:;i' di and Ihr di'inaml;. i-t' hi:. i-,.tnlt:il m 

vh'oniiH'iil, extreme;;. (Wtain nUVn.'iivc vinnuiK-nl. 1'iilil (In- iin-ili.iih.lt.j-v i>t 

JUKI dHVllKiVl! K(nite|>ii- DUtlcricI, for n ,jll HlVrlivrin':,.: ha:i .|.'\r|. .,., I ; 

example, is developed t(i n|)(>rali> in mi'llmd I'm- mpiui'. v.ilh llii (min ,,i 

this partial internet ion environment. mM, lh.< m.,i HlVi'iivm.- . (.'hniipi. 

It's important at thin point to ri'coi;- applied hi minimi int.'i an inf. m..i< i \--l 

niy.o (liiil UK- aecniumnilatiii)',' ''liar during Ihe ivijimvnu'ii! .Irhniimi, 

nrtcriiilics of the man nmiimnenl of ph,'i:;i' iniiM hr ivnicui.'.'d n . m. mn 

the. mim-mtu'liim 1 rclnlion.'ihi]) maki'ii pli'lc mul ;.n:.ri'ptiMi- in |n>(. -iiii.i!! 1 , 

UK; Kynt.i'ni into which tin- nnidyn! iiudiniwnl t-rrnr, 

Wdl'ttH u foi-j-ivitijc oin>. Tin- cuinli.'il Wi- lifivc up hi itii:, jiutnt mdnn! 

mildid', ainiiaii, or iiiiilnr, hcnnun' lu> unity rxninin.'.) i hr ihi.'.- inif.n ).-i 

luis nilioiiii] iiineiniit.y jitul hli'nl. i;il ii-n nf i)i:il<>rjr| upon v.hirl, i. !, ; , , ,j 

tllli'lll,, will roill|)i>ll:;idi' fin' i-iTurji ill lilt- UIIMV.T. "ll ili-pi-nd..." ln.'li v. ,, 

'lll, lllHvil.tillJ'ly MUllll' lIllcillK I'.ivrn in iv/ip ....... |,> lln- ,jii, !-..,, 



'"' iiii-l. il III,. p,., ,..; . ;.. . 

. ' ' " ilu and f[ 

Wl(U " 'I'"'' '" ini-, malrriH nil 
t""l..t .:,!> . I, ,, ,,,, ,,,,1^,^ 



l>'i|>nn- H 

rmni.. ,,|,lion, 111;l , riN .,,- 

,.,.,!,,.^,,,, ...... ,,, liri ..... .,, K 

ilonlly m nm.iy itiHlannvt hmui.,. t | lt , :j . ,|,m. 

l.m^tkaowwhal.ailrniiilenp.ra !l(t , :i f,,rlh 

l^'apalnl.l.y },,. m \ K h\ |, nvi , | U1( |. i,,,,.,,,,.^,,,, ,,, 

- IH a ro.,1 that [ truly i m |H,r ,,,,,1 Illllt1l| .|i v :,n 
111 ''' 




mi,,,! [, H)|nifl 
:,'., m ,, r lltl> , 1||fl 

'!''" 'f , u.int, ( , r ,],;,, n ; 

MMlI-. ..I llltrllUili*,..,. 1( |,, lHi | 

MMiMi.nlMin. u rdinii-iuiis mniinry 
"I'' 1 '"' flilf. i( in |,.|i ni from' 
'.'M't'i'fi'iii'i-. Ir I,,,., ,, r,.|,,,, r y,| e 

liirtlll\ l,i| In, InillUI Illll Hut . 
pOltlllll tllil.ilil,.., tltl( | 

I''.' i cM. I'll,-,,, f,,,. Ih,' 
tiuntiiii lii-iui:-. lii-iti imu'ldnt'x lit 
1 ''''"'' '" " Jl1 i:ninr.,. Hill, oil (\\? 
'd.lr "I itlMlh ',!-.; I'il'hl. it'n WI'IIUH 

IH liinl, upon ihltilHiin and iinnly. 
''''' '" mind': nud ..... rliini'H OH 

1 1* ' r ..... ilin iintl*,-,, i'ni|n>i'ly 

"' l d, lln v > "lupli'iiii-til cili'll 
nil, i V\ , l>it\ p <ii< t .|| dint every 
111 '' [t -'" nh ...... 'i 'diot (lirmifih 

^ nli iniuiiii'ii nnd jinlitnu>ii|. 

\ "< rl di-, ih|,.n f h,il m-i'\t\>, |o tie 
lui'iril mi iiidHduli in |inill|ll)ly 
idmt tliiMUi;)) \s ilh -iiin'li'H of 



, 

1H U,n pot, 
!l ;1 " llll(1 ' h 



,,,. 

. (ir 

,. in Hfy ilmt |; lth ..,.,, ,,,,,,,, I(li , |( 

,.,^ Wl . ;illll ,,| , ,,, i,,.,^,,,,;,,,. ,,. n 

, . e; I,],, ttvl ,,-,.,. ,-,, ll|(V .,,,,!;., s i',.,, ( 

ri (li>|H.,iilH in moia ( ,i,.,, on ||, 

u, l,H, l 




on 



(,,.,, It). Aunln il.L. j, -nr.ln.n , 
,, m | , j,,,,.,,,,,,, ..... ,.,,,,,,, 

" r iii " ii '"' 1 "'" ' 

lmn.,m or. f,,,,,, a(!,n!i, ( , ...... w i lllf tllt( ., ( .,. 




FfASIBlLltV DEMWSIRAIION 



CONTRACT OEflNfTlON 
WOIWIRIHC DEVElOPMEW 



OtVElOPMtNl 



/ 



(LlHllDIIV 



1 'tin", i" . .-,11 ,- u I, ,,, , r ii,. m ,.>,|i|.n. 

"'"' '' '''"I '-'!! f -l> !"l "lit iltllllll'lllllt 

-. in i'.ii.j, , ii .,- ,,,ild ,!}>).. MI [hut DHL' 
1 hull. :<(< Ihrn i : h, m'unliiin Uli' 

r..i,i|i!.-h-i ]>( .U ', ! c!:dii|:!i)j|i Illl'll' 

iMind, i-.tiil HI.! }..-(iint fJti- itiiri'iidi'tirV 
"' 'h< ii] ! (h. i ii .il Huirhiii'- nViT lln 1 
mill. I 1 1 ,).> i .(,,11 , (Ihif :..'i-in In If 
''' * 'I "i-. ir.hiii I'.M ,11 1- itidfi'fl iilll 
Un.-m;h '.-. iilt jiiutt), ;!:. ,1 nilfth! Well 

fttlim-, I hiil (|f 



!tu- ,i-l>. i<t.!:ij.." lh:il *Jn- min 




July 




below are some events 

of ' ects wi . thin the Department 

i. i. O:te ^ise which may be of inter- 
tlier - ^^'iters and editors. If fur- 
lr *foa'mation on any of these 
(les j re(] > P^ase write to 
~, tigazine and Book Branch, 

ui iiLQ of Assistant Secretary of De- 
lenso < I^uijiic Affairs) , Washington, 
D. U 



NEW NAVY CRAFT THAT 
FLOAT ON AIR NOW IN 

VIETNAM 

Three TSTavy craft that "float" on 
a cualiioxr of air are in operation in 
Vintnam. E a ph of the high-speed 
patrol "boats is powered by a single 
tfas tiai_*t)i:ne engine which provides 
both lift and propulsion through a 
lift fan a/ncl an aircraft-type variable 
pitch r*i*oi>eller. The 39-foot craft can 
travel over- water, swamp and flat land 
areas at speeds in excess of BO knots 
while combat loaded. Each boat is 
manned T>y two officers and two en- 
listed men. They are taking part in 
thn N sivy's coastal surveillance opera- 
tions in. "Vietnam. 



AIR FORCE TESTS FAST 
SETTING POLYESTER FOR HELO 
LANDING SITES 

Rapiel landing sites that can be 
ready to receive vertical/short take- 
off nncl landing aircraft and helicop- 
ters in. one and one-half hour are just 
around tlie corner. One of the mate- 
rials xtiideT commercial development 
for tlie -A-ir Force is a fast-setting 
polyester" **esin. In tests, a 16x32-foot 
shnltoi,' floor of the chlorinated poly- 
ester 3_*esin formulation reinforced 
with 
desert 
in 30 
inatelv 



foot 
' 



glass was sprayed over soft, 
Spraying was completed 
s and the floor, approxi- 
one-fourth inch thick and 
,"bout two pounds per square 
hardened within one hour. 
Tho'floax' showed no damage or perma- 
nent clef ovmatiqn after it was tested 

nnnnnaEiively with two automobiles 
success* v 3)600 pounds eachj a 7j00 o- 

-1 helicopter with steel 



ADVANCED HYDROGEN 

GENERATOR UNDERGOES 

TESTS BY U.S. ARMY 

The Army is currently testing an 
advanced hydrogen generator for use 
with hydrogen-air fuel cells. Weighing 
460 pounds and occupying 18 cubic 
feet, the generator is expected to make 
possible, for the first time, a practical 
electric power system that combines 
very high efficiency and inexpensive 
liquid fuel. In operation, the genera- 
tor uses slightly .more than two quarts 
of fuel an hour to produce 140 cubic 
feet an hour of ultra-pure hydrogen, 
which can be used in practical fuel 
cells to produce 7,000 watts of DC 
electrical power. The generator itself 
requires only 325 watts. Five quarts 
of water an hour are consumed in the 
steam -reform ing process of the gener- 
ator. However, it can be supplied by 
water recovery from the fuel cell and 
the generator stack gas, thereby mak- 
ing the system practically self-sus- 
taining. 



ARMY DEVELOPS 

TINY YET RUGGED 

SIGNAL DEVICE 

The Army has developed a radio- 
wave signal generator the size of a 
grain of rice. The essential material 
in the generator, gallium arsenide,^ is 
a speck invisible to the naked eye. Ex- 
periments so far have; proven the de- 
vice highly efficient with almost un- 
precedented signal strength output in 
comparison to electrical power input. 
The generator has unusual frequency 
ranges in the microwave and milli- 
meter portions of tho spectrum; testa 
have been pushed up to 40 gigacycles 
(one billion cycles per second) . As a 
solid-state device, the signal generator 
is inherently rugged, long-lived and, in 
mass production, would be cheap to 
produce. Additionally, it is highly 
compatible with the microelectronic 
circuitry now being produced for _a 
growing number of other electronic 
functions. 




SEu - 9,000-pound fork lift, a 10,500- So small it requires tweezers for handling, this radio-wave generator, or oscilla- 

8iu(is, ** _* 5g hel i copter an( j a 17 500- tor, promises to supplant devices up to hundreds of times Larger 111 some of the 

fi-r-e truck. Additional tests will Army's future models of lightweight communications and radar equipment. The 

H-ctcted to measure shrinkage, solid state generator's essential material, a speck of gallium arsenide invisible 

n fire resistance. to the naked eye, is contained within the package held by the tweezers. 



Defers** Industry Bulletin 




l-'iiiifl:. ,|M,;I l'. ( 
'iilr,.|linr, id.- u.-.'il 



by 

Col. llvrlii'rl Walilninu, USAF 

IHr, for ANHI'|N !\liiaii)!eiiii'it( Synli'inn 

Ollii'i 1 of AHK!. Hem'liiry of DdVimr (Vmtipli-olln ) 

Tint olijedive;;, overall strueLai'e lively ami Hlii'i.'nlly i,\ ihr arr.irn 

and development principle:; of ((K. plislunrnt. nf |H)|) ,ilij,-,'iiv.-;. 

licKdiifcc Maini|.;(.nienl, Syslrmii were 'I'.i (inivhlf infunniil inn dini i 

fuldl'i'NKcil oy Aiirdstaiit Ki'd'Hiiry of useful in I In 1 I'm run In I inn ut nli \>-, 

llcfuriiH! tCninptmlli.r) |{ (l |n.r|. N. lives and phm-i. 

Antlmny durinj.; Uir UOD-Nalioiml . T,, pmviitc Jahi I.. ; ,n i ,,, 

Hncurily hulii.Hlrial A^ariation Ad- ,,nmi iir..iH. ;! ;il!, ;unl i i . t,, 



mul - 



mi 

1 M'!i '"' th- rllnH. 1,, 
K'l.-.-l,,| A^MmUH,,; 

..,.,1 Ma,,aK,,m,,l Sy.nn ,,,,.,,. ,,,,,>,.. ..... ,.- M:,,| -V ..ni,',., lfl . ;.,, , .., 

SA IMS wlnrl, ,, ,,f u,,, ly|M1|l ..... ((M| y ,-,,. ,,,,,,, ,, :ii . ttj|J) 1;i|vnij , ,. llhllhlnr .,,,;.;":' .f" 

11 """ """ ...... " ' - ...,.. r .,..,(..,,>-. w,,,,, i ..... ,,, ,-.,,,,..,,,. :, ,:!',; ;.;,,;";;;;:: ,;; 

""' i" " ..... II.'Mlluii ,.| M-U.M,-] ., . .' 

. 'iil f 

lion, ntit!/a on urn ( 

Of Cllllttlll UHHflN, Whll iH 
prw;cNH of KCtlhiK Iliu wcapnn mill 




. 

, mill ftt loWONl I'dHl' , " 

, .- I'M,. 

flAIMil 



RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 



th K(!ononii ( - Infonnatl.ni 'jiviiieiii ''"'''''"''.uMnT m.-iiMnvn,.,,,! .i,,!,, illM , .,,, ., (lll| , 

(I'!IK) iiniiLlin-. Inilinl HIWl,, In I^S "Inrrr'Ihri lllMl ' iy '' ' lMl1 * >l ' i|M: " u "''' "'' ''^ 

Tlio lmpli>mntall(in of the nuw re' 
will result in i)| mH j )1K , lltl 

in Oliart IL 

Major !ij,4i.inn d(.)i|j[ii clloi'l In ahio 
(iiirn-ntly in proivim in Hie tln'r.i p m .t 
f .SAIMK, wliirlt in nnironivd w |[)i 
lioi'Tormanrii nieamircincnt (Clmrt 
HI). Work In id,. SAIMN un-a f lt 
ciirrontly \wln K apiiomiillHlind in tin- 
T)Irfi(ilomt for AHHWIH 
SyHtrnm under tlm \h>\wiy 

KyHleniH Development) in liie'Vt'illi'n 



Tho (.1,JP(!U V ..H of HAIMH. \vlil.-li 
an! K ''i'" lo all n. H1)im . ( , minmK(1 . 
tH intcmhl for UH( , t(V 



* '!' provide IIHIIIIIKI^'H at ,,|| 

ovnlH within DOI) will, inrornmlion 

Hint will li,<l,> tlu-m Hmiii< tlu.L n ,. 

Hiiunum an> ohlaliiiiil and nm \ t .ft w .. 

20 



^ 



(2) 



Programmlno 
and 



Syslonu 



Oporolions 

Manet (jomtutt 

Syalems 



Invontory 



A 



Sysltim* 



M) 

Acr|ui(ition 
Information 

(in (I 

MtHKigomont 

Syslonu 



fh DOD 

Conlraclor 

Interface 



(Ilwrl I, 



July 1966 



individual plans and local geographic 



A continuing evaluation of new 
approaches and innovations in the 
construction of management sys- 
tems, with the goal of improving 
DOD management effectiveness and 
reducing management costs. 

Current efforts are being devoted 
to an investigation of existing rnan- 
agement systems procedures and 
data gathering systems concerned 
with cost, schedule and technical 
performance as a prelude to the do- 
sign of data collection prototypes. 
The development of requirements 
for reporting funding information 



(Contract Funds Status Report 
CFSR) is the remaining part of this 
current systems design effort. 

Industry comments and recom- 
mendations for improving the initial 
approach in designing CFSR have 
been received, am being evaluated, 
and will result in a moans of col- 
lecting data ahout estimates of 
change in contract funding require- 
ments to support financial manage- 
ment, Positive collaboration with 
industry will continue so that re- 
sponsible criticism becomes an ex- 
plicit element of input in future 
management systems design. 



PLANNED PHASEOUT OF DOD REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 



Existing Re[wr!s 
Current 



Proposed 
Replacement 



Plants Affected 



Effective Date 



OD Form W01 
Plant Data 

DDForm 1401-1 
Direct Labor Data 



DD Form 1401-2 
Completed Unit 
Data 



DD Form H01-3 
Flowtimoand 
Release Dales 



DD Form 1177 
Cosl Incurred on 
Contract 



Format 1 Plantwiile 
Economic Rc|>orl 



Cost 

Information 
Reports 



All 



Producers 
ol Elements 
ol Aircraft 
Missile & 
Space Systems 



All Other 



Upon BOB Approval 

a. Newcontracls-CIR, when estaljllshed.wlll 
lie used for Selected Acquisition, alter OSD 
approval, 

I). Current contracts- DC PH Series continues 
through contract completion unless 
agreement is reached between Government 
and Industry representatives far replace- 
ment by C I R, 

a. Newcortlracts-CIR. when established, may 
he used to the extent agreement is reached 
between Government and Industry repre- 
sentatives expressed in a contract, 

b. Currenl contracts-DCPR series continues 
through contract completion unless agree- 
ment Is reached between Government and 

I nduslry representatives (or replacement 
byCIR. 



Chart II. 



SELECTED ACQUISITIONS INFORMATION- 
AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 



ECONOMIC 
INFORMATION 
SYSTEM 


COST 
INFORMATION 
REPORTS 


PERFORMANCE 
MEASUREMENT 




THE DOD CONTRACTOR 
INTERFACE 



Chart III. 



New Weather Radars 
Slated For S.E. Asia 

Powerful new long-range weather 
radars, capable of giving advance 
knowledge of rainfall and other 
weather conditions 200 miles away 
and up to 15 miles high, are being 
procured by the Air Force for use in 
Southeast Asia. 

Developed for the U.S. Weather 
Bureau by the Raytheon Co. specifi- 
cally for weather detection and analy- 
sis, three of the radars will be in- 
stalled by the Air Force at selected 
locations in Southeast Asia 

The radars will be positioned in a 
triangle to provide maximum cover- 
age of meteorological phenomena. The 
storm-detecting equipment will keep 
an electronic round-the-clock track of 
weather in a 200,000-square-mile area, 

The 433L System Program Office 
at the Air Force Systems Command's 
Electronic Systems Division, L.G. 
Hanscom Field, Mass., is responsible 
for procuring and installing the high 
priority radars. Raytheon Co. is 
prime contractor for the system. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Problem Mongers, Solution Mongers 

(Continued from page 18) 

In closing it's worth noting that a 
growing number of statesmen in the 
scientific and technological community 
have been expressing concern over 
the dangers of technological compla- 
cency and the need for innovation 
encouragement. This discussion of 
problem mongers, solution mongers 
and operational uncertainty offers 
the following postulate for considera- 
tion, namely, one of the best ways to 
strangulate innovation is to attempt 
to rigorously quantify the effective- 
ness of innovative concepts. 

Attempts to quantify the unquanti- 
fiable, in the interests of satisfying 
the demands of an unyielding meth- 
odology, is a potentially stifling prac- 
tice that could cause irreparable 
damage to our technological supre- 
macy and the consequent ability to de- 
fend ourselves during the challenging: 
decades ahead. At the other extreme, 
neglect of the quantifiable economics 
of defense materiel, in the interests 
of cost-free choices of action, is also 
a dangerous practice that could cause 
irreparable damage to our economic 
solvency and the consequent fiscal 
stability necessary during the chal- 
lenging decades ahead. The prudent 
course lies between those two ex- 
tremes. Enlightened understanding, 
on the part of the military, technical 
and economic professional, of thn 
limits and constraints of their regions 
of competency can contribute greatly 
toward assuring that this judicious 
course is maintained. 



21 




Contraels of 1,000,000 and over 
awarded during the month of May 
1966: 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

1 Crowley Indnsfr'nl Dae Co., Crowley, Ln 
81.J06.JOO. 55,000 |)acka K e3 of osnabure 
sandbnes 1 100 baps to a imckaee). Crowley. 
Dufcnse General Supply Center, Richmond. 
Vn. 

Cavalltr Bag Co., Lumberton, N.C. SI,. 
001,105. 10.000 packages of burlap sand- 
ba R s nnd 70.000 packages of osnaburg 
pnn,lba E ;i (100 baea to a package). Lumber- 
on Defense General 
Richmond, Va. 



. 
Supply Center, 



^-on. 

!-r 1 ' 10 n-, ' l000 meta! 

Richmond! Va. e Genera ' 
New York 



F1Int - Mich - 
P1 boxes. 

C(mtcr ' 



11.097,250. 



York 



, -- ., 

yanla of cotton oxford cloth. N 



N ? w York City - 83.285,000. 
cott011 oxlotti clot ^ New 



ew Vork City ' 81.029,000. 
on oxford cloth. New 

e personncl Supllort 



N.J. 



2J. P. Stevens & Co.. New Yor 



lll , 

twill cloth anil 972,000 yards of cawM 
cotton twill cloth. New York City Defenle 
&iiri ?- UPPOrt Cenler ' Philadelphia 
m ] 78I S^"" 9 ree j labor . N.C. SI, 80.. 
cloth 1 K 2 l y8rfs nJ cnrtlcd cotto " twl 1 

' 



upport 






e 
~ 



DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



9 Standard Oil Co. of Cnlif., Son Francisco 
51,810.686. 12,691,200 sal Ions of RF-1 
rocket fuel. Defense Fuel Supply Center, 
Alexandria, Vn. 

10 Deerinff Milllken, Inc., New York City. $3,- 
677,530. 509,000 yds of wool Rabimline 
cloth. Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia. 

Interstate Mf ff . Co. Inc.. Hudson, Mass. 
31,089,880. 92,000 pairs of men's wet- 
weather, coated nylon overalls. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
Payne & Associates, Inc., HnlciRh, N.C. 
$1,216,389. 100,108 pairs of men'n wet- 
weather coated nylon overalls, Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
Superior Slcepritc Corp., ChieiiRO. 31,2(11,- 
830. 4S,EOO steel bunk beds, Dofimsu (Jcn- 
ernl Supply Center, Richmond, Va. 
13-Shell Oil Co., New York City. $1,G4.|,JB1 
Petroleum services & products. Defense 
Fuel Supply Center, Alexandria, Vn. 
H Continental Motors Corp., MuukcRon, Mich. 
51,017,150. 3,985 cylinder assemblies. Di>- 
fense Construction Supply Center, Colum- 
bus, Ohio. 

-LaCrosse Garment Ktg. Co., La Crosso, 
W.B. $1.150,062. 435.949 nylon | llHUl -t bars! 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phlln- 
cielpnia. 

""]"ini. n , Co " M( "'"3to, Calif. $8,- 
, -100.008 cases of Individual com- 



Slll)1([y 



. 
n* vSs^i,;'- 



,rl Contcf, I ..... ,,, 
Twlnco 1'roditcta Inc Rnn' 
SUOK.MO. LOSO^S-.S,", 

"o. S"S;,, 



in. 



T a of H 
'" V 



t. Alaska. 



23 Valley Hclnlli,r 



Ywk 



'I. Mich. $1,043,- 



135600 ml,i- lnCnH |mjunm trouHWfl i 



Jnn " 'll'n mm " , Inc -i nolenm i>. M ' "."I 
rw, ,-"'"' 1 l 110 iwlrs of tropicfll comhlto 
cffiln" C1 ' HOIlllcl SPI'ort Conter, Flii 
-Safely Firdt Shoe Co., Nashville T-i 




OH.. 



Center 



cn n C |n tv n 
Kan. D Q f enBe Ind U8 trT n l Pl n "t' 
Center, Memphis, 1'enn ' 



-Kmllcolt JolniHon Corp., Emlfcott, H. V. 
$1,H8H,S!JO. 1(18,000 pairs of tropical toa*: 
iKHitH. OefeiiHc Personnel Support Cea;-:, 
I'liilndi'lphin. 

Wellcn Hhoo Dlv. nf Wcllco Ro-Stuctli- 
ihistrlcH, Inc., Wnynesvillo, N.C. $l,lB,ti!. 
01,000 pnli'H of tropiunl combat loote. fc 
fomie I'oi'Bonnol Supiiort Center, Pli 
'Itslplilu. 

fiMllforil Mills, Oreeiiaboro, N.C, S3,SO!,!:! 
Itt.lidO.OOO yds of knitted nylon c!:i 
tjreoimhoro, Defense Perflonnel SiiK;T 
(.enter, I'lillndolphia. 
..... (rllbrallnr Fabrics, Inc., Brookli-n, Nl. 
?l,Ofla,03C. 4,000,000 y<ln of knitted:.)::] 
fllotli, Dofonae Personnel Supiiorl Cla. 
I'hilndotiihin. 

a-1 -Ansiil Co., Mnrinette, Wis. 12,051,'^. 
-100.000 irnlloim of herbicide, Defense te- 
ernl Supply Center, Richmond, Vn. 
Crosfl Country Clothes, Inc., NorlhsiDfta 
I'ft. $1.001,178. JLllG men'a troplfilwJ 
Defense Personnel Support C!a 



c])). 

Humlilc Oil & Rcflning Co., Houston, la. 
$8,-H3.370, 3C,'IOO,000 gallons of JP-I :<! 
fuel. Defcnnc Fuel Supply Confer, AB- , 
Va. 



. 



,. 7 



, 



. 

Texaco Inc., New York City. ),, 
30,3.10,000 Knllona of grade JP-4 Jet ^ 



tablets. 



. eeiiBe 
Center, PhlUdolph" 




Vu. 



p y- 

Peraotlll( =l Support 

Now York City. 
^ mlldow- 
(luck 



,4810 i 4 60 9 n u , c cot - 

dyed mlldew.resiBtnnt Lt"*" ^ of vnt 
ton duck doth ^ D ofen ' T? tcr ''' elle , Ilcnt wt- 
Center, Philadelphia Pcraonne l Support 

P 



Fuel Supply Center, 

- Stntca Potrocliomicnl Co., HOD.*! 

Tex, $2,019,740. 28,371,000 Bflllw fi 
Braclc JP-4 jot fuel. Defense Fuel Ew 
Center, Alexnndria, Va, 
Continental Oil CO., Houston, Tex. *!.!& 
700, 12,000,000 gnllona of smite J 
fuel. Defense Fuel Supply Center 
nndrla, Vn. 

27 Centre MfR. Co., Centre, Aln, .,- 
100,620 mon'B nylon-coated raincoals 
fonso Pernonnol Support Center, 1 
dolphin. 



July 19 



--Sprnimk Clirmlralti, Inr,. Hniiiklyii, N.Y 
r fl,.17l),:M)(}, l!,r.mi.min i-mm of liiiirrlh'Mo, 
I)i>fi'lin (ii'itonil Hupiily Ci'iilfi 1 , Klrlniininl. 
Vn. 

2H ..... Wlntltr.m l.itlioraKirli'H, Ni-w Yurli l!lly. 
$l,lilJti, liOll. (}miiiH11i.ii of iirlMiiiijiiln.' a.i.l 
I'liliiroiinlm' iirii.hirlii. Mcfi'niii' IVi'minni'l 
KiiPimrl. tViilor, Plii1a.]i'li.)ila. 

- Almli' ClothliiK, Inc., Alliuill.' (lily, N.J. 

$l,aiH,K<HI. (ill, Illlll IIH-II'II wnnl iii'nit ...... UH. 

Ilcfi'lim' I'lTilimnH Mij|i|i..rt I'l'lMiT, I'll 11(1- 

,1,'lphla. 

H. (I. Cfillnn 'I'pxtllrn, Now Yurli (Illy. 3U,- 

4ii7, mm, li.oim, ...... y.i.i ,,r win.) m.iiiiuhi 

rollon A nylon mili'i'ii cloth. Mrfi'imc IVr- 
HniiiH'l Mit|]>iirl duller. Philadelphia. 
--Knvlii MIllH. New Yurli I'lly. ?I.IK!II, Hill. 
l,ll!r>.l)0(l yilit nf wind I'rninlunl follon iimi 
nylon iiuli'i'ik i>lolh. llrlYiun> IVni.imii'l 
!ill|>in)i'l Ci'.ili'r, l'hllinlnl|.liln, 

- -HiiNlnnin Kmlnk Co., Hin-hiv.l.>r, N.Y SI - 
<IOH,.H(1. Ml, Itllll mil., of i>rinl i!u|ili<'riHiin 
Him. lli'f- ..... H (inn-nil Miii'l'ly Cmlrr. 
lUiili.minil, Vn. 

211 Wt'jitlirrvaiii' <>i.l(>riv<'itr Corp., Ni>w V.irlt 
(Illy. Sil.Hr.il.tm. !;;;!, HVll <-i,m,.uMii|. 
iniiii'lni llnrni, l)i>JVliin> t'i'niij.iiii.l liiiiuiori 
CeiU.-r, l'lilli,.l.i|].l,|N, 
HmiltT Uul.lnor I'ruiliirlfi. In.-,, [,t,nn 

Mami, N.Y. si. 4:111.11111. miii.vmi ,i,iir..] 

IHIJPI. I)i'fii||iii> I'i'i'iiiitini'l Mii]i]iiirl IVntiT 
rlillii(l(>][iliin, 

- -Tll Di'fi'iniit IVnioMiti'l MI||IJI,.I| d'nlrr, 
I'lillrnli'lphln, linn iiwnrili'il lite f.illmvlnii 
miilra.'l.t fur linily ai'iiinr vcnln. 

I,. \V. l''nnli'r MiiorlNivcnr I'n., I'hllu- 

ili'liililn. si, air/, I'liii. 7)i.o(ni vrr.in. 

KlnitN I'ohil liKlinilrli'H, Ni'w V.'vli <'llv. 

81,HU:,OWI. 101), (101) vcritM, 

Mnrlln l.itno Co., Kllv.iibi'lh. N.,l. Sl.ltiiV,. 

Ol'H. 77, Hill V.'.llil. 

Morrlit llriiH., Inc., New Yuri, (!Hv, $1 .. 

(Hi. 11 ir,, HDD, mm wtiii ....... i. .11 I,,..) ni,f>|.in. 

I)i>fi'lnu> IVi'uimiH'l iiiiMK.rl IViili-r, t'lilln,, 
(li't|)liiu, 

HnrliiKM Ciitliiri MIllH, Now Yui'li Cllv. $1 . 
Ifi.i.HHO. HOD.OdO wlilto n.Mim lu>.l nli,-r1n. 
Di'friiM' tVriiniiiti<l ,'lii|i|n>i'l (ViHcr. I'lillu- 
ili'llillln. 
-II. (i. Ciillon Text Hi-it. New Y! ii-|i CHv. 

$i,>rjK,i>:!:>. I.IVM. ,!(>() v,i rl ,,r w |,,,i n-iiniiuM 

C'ltllill oxfr-l'il I'lnlll. lli'fcnm. I'rnininirl 

Mll|it>ur( Ci'itlrr. l'lilliul.-l|i)ihi, 
---<!. M, I.iiiiiliin CD.. Hi-w V. ifli Mlii*. SI.IIIHI ., 

UH. HHIl.NIW yil-t ( if wlml .."ilnliir.i n.M..h 

iixfin-il rli.lli. llrfrnun IVrmtittu-l .'IniiiH,. t 

(li'ii)fi'. l'lill(nl.]i.lil, 
- ('iino Mllln C.ir|i,, <li'i'i<nnt>nni, N.C, Jl.mn.. 

1HI. l.llim.NHH ydn ,,f , ..... ,, l ,lv-.,h'r uvlll 

fiith. IW.'im,. IVfm.uiit'l linvimrl d.nf.-r. 

! l lillint-'l|.hln, 

Ittr., N.-w Ynrli Cliv. S;!,o:i:M;'H 

.iii Ht ,]|,, Mll ,,f ttrBi | (1 , M . 4 j,., ',;,;,,; 

"J ( ' r ....... ' '''I' 1 ' "n].i'!y Ci-nli't', Ali-M.mlHit, 

( '" n !'.' N " w v '"' 11 (;|u '' w.iM.an". 
i.n,.iw .,f H nui,. ji- ft j,-i f lt ,,|, 

n|/i>iiiiu H,,.| |ii ..... |y iVnirr. Ali-xnmlrln. 

1 u l nL r . t - Turlltr * ''"' N " w Vitrh Cliy. SI.- 
OHIIHIH. -HPJir.ll . MM-,.,, wp.il^.rwV 
1'imtn wild Mm, !><>fi.mi n IVnumiifl fii.,. 



- . 

"'"' 



vltl.', tlhln. 

urn,]!- J]' . 



V '"' k 

f ' 



, 
r, Alrxnilrln. V, 



TIK.ltm. IJH i iruniimimUon muicm) II 
f.Hn, l:i ' ( K,1;., "w I,"" 1 ' 1 .' ''" 1llr 1'lB'to'iiH.itZ: 

i^iii.uiEfri; 1 '"" '^ Av " lti<m Ml " 

'' n ''^m'S 



ARMY 



"- N|V - ... 

|l ..... llrlll. I'.,ll K h. 



wi fi 

[' irl Mi 

' * , ,. 

. ttt 

. vw HKlMlllHMl |VMN. N.-'ftr 

Oily. Mn Kmflnwr llt,, Knptiiti 

rzM"i a iwi Tll [f ft nilhWr t>fl - Akr ""- 

lor .'? M M " lllw . r lrnr . k ? I " M! W 

ior tiio MOO vhlH, NO)I|MV||I. 



| r i1 j J?" ?,? T ,". M - W" 18 "" W* 1 ""- 
conun.1li?. <<2 "i Ir f (lllll f w' Army M\. 
livSit w u B "l "inl*n<- f nlrcrurt 
^wUnirW ni| iT-M'!'Mlnit MI,) i: till - 

Lbt A K rM. m e V.' 01 ' 1 Wn 'l'. TftS, 

r " reln ( '" wlnil 



, . 

D ," 1 " K"M Cliy. Mo. 
Co., Kri Worth' Tax. JB.- 



. ,,, nn'itii, .. 
Kitljirr , ,'n, Cnr,, T.il,,!,,. Ohio, ^.^V.fiUN. 
,,,,' r , ' V ..... :: v , tir ....... "' rHiMi.'.l 

i - ..-I ,. K .i.v, -i, ...... . ([,. n , iril , ,,,.; 

A I I. y uV' Jl "' ( M ""'r. Army 

i i V L V" 1 . 1 '"'' Wlll '''". Mlt-ti, 
' m.rk n.lwlrr-.. r, ( ti, lptlll|l , ([.Hf., S ,,,. 
I' ...mm, |.|i|,r|,.|i|| ...... f '(.DUO H K |, (w .|Kli 

win.ilni.Mi l.ul kiln. I'l.n.'nin,,. A(^ 7i 
M', Army. M,LWIL||. 

Jr"lM l X..*i' I i' ml ? F " >n (!n - i; "''"''. (!. 
ft MM i i " " Ml ...... "''<'"'""" "'''I',.. Am- 

;; i i i l j l ; i '" I ' 1 yi--''-r..m,., 1 t & ! )11|tll | y Altt , Ilt . y( 

4M"i r '!WVl'l f 'T" 1 " 1 lll ' r " pl1 ' t; ' ltif ' *'.- 
I ' ' . "'" "'""'' "!" lr " f" lrll( ' Nrwuon 

R;::;;!!;.,,,^;,^ ....... ..... " t " 1 ..... *''* 

!' < 1 ||1 . |M ; 1 I(nill(l <'- l ..... 'i. T,.x. *:!.K(Ki.nnw 

,',','-''', ..... ;;'>/ i" ....... it-.h,,,,.!. ; ir i, " : 

iitiiln ... ... llhlli,,,, Arn.v Kl-vir..!!!,.,, (I,,.,,. 

.mml r,,,, M,,M,M,,ii(h, N.,1. '"" 



lln Mllil rn .>it 



C,m., Now 



,, " (ivnnt ni i.oriiu now m.vi'ii 

< '.i. SUilY.iiliU. Mli ( ,iiMi. r ',(,,,!, ft.p Mil 
niir.i. ,<|,i'li>Hll.'l.l Anmiry, ili.rlnitfl.'l.l, 

llniHiiwIt'k Ciirp.. Marl Vu. 1 1.11)17 III u 

idiii in i'iirlrl,l|i,. laiinrlii.ni. I'ttrhrfulnirii, 

I-'" II'"IM.I ,. i K'hri'Wfitiil Anu'iiat, Mil,' 

i . U. H Irli (ii., In.-, Mlmnfi.nl Cniui S3 .. 

I .'"l u ' 1 '* 1 "" 11 ' 1 "" "f WNT imi'iily,' ,.|iV- 

. U!M!" "' "" "'" i " 1 "" 1 ' 



.. , .-.. l.t.i. 

N.Y. l-.iinlii.-rr Dhi.. N.-w Yi.t-k N.Y 

iTrim-. ni 'w r "V lnf -;. (! 'rl li " 1 ' 1 - 1 - >'> 
I...H.I, ,im.l U,,rk i; llllt ,| r ,,, , lf ,. 

' 



' 1 ' 



''''" Knuh 



'.' Mttrt-iin.nl Cnrii.. !!H..,I, Muln.-. 11.471 ua;i 
Mtlil tfiit.'hl.iK mi mi with l.nrivl niiil li'lim.j 
tin.|.'ii,li||.-ji, Ar.nv Wi-Hiiitiirt C.imniati.l. 
ll.ii-k lulitixt Arm-iiHl, UiH'k hilnnil. 111 
nlcrnnllniinl Hnrvenlcr Co., Mutronc 1'nrk 
Ml. flli.Hl.iril). 711 fiilhlrni'li.'.t tniolorx for 
this Niivy. Army Mohillly Kiiiilmm'iil Ct-n- 

I'-r. !il. I In, 

j'flf* Curu.. Mf.)i|.l,l!i, 'IViin. )l.fil7,7H3, 
ir.niFii rniililiTii, K.tjti'wi.o.1 Arnimnl. Mil. 
nnhi-rmil Tprmlnl K, HUvnloHtir <'orp . 
Ni'W Vi.rk Clly. (la.HHK.UBS. Htnvr.torliiK 
ni-rvti'i-i MI I)H. Mllltnry tWnn 'IVniiliml, 
Hy.ijtit'. N.J, Military Trtitlk Mftnitttcnu'iit 
nii'I Irnnlnnl .Mi-rvlrMt, IlnMiklyn, N.Y. 
10 J'.H. Ituhlitr Co., Mlnlinwnkn. In.l. (I.HIH.. 
fi.!0. lli.ilv- nr.n.ir. Army Niitl.'k I,nh.irn. 
It.i'lf'rt. Nnllck, MIIIIM. 

Norlott Co,. WiircrMtr, HMM. (l.l!07,rtHO. 
Hnilv itriiinr. Army Nnllck linlmrnlorh^, 

Chjtntcal Com poti ttdlnjr Corp.. J*;rney Clly, 
N.J. JUH.OUH, M^-iinintnlnntliiK A relm- 
t<rftmntliit( kltfl, KilKowm.il Antvnnl, Mil, 
Hroirlltft Mf*. Co,, Wnlsrlmry, Ounii, (1,. 
Ofil.Hll, MtMtlflrntliiti to nn Rx1nHii({ con- 
trnri fur Iwrnili ctiiniHinentit. Anummltlnii 
I'r.^iirpitifnl. A Bu|i|<ly Aftericy, Jolliit, III. 

MinllfirftU.nl kiln In mijumrl 'of ih 'T83 
etiKlno f,. r HIM lrcra. Army Avlntlon 
Mulprld (ii.mmitnil, Bt, I^utn. 
Fttllrrton Contructlon Co,. Hue rumen to, 
t>Bllf. 11,176.000, (Sonatrucllon of nn nen- 
ilcmlr Milff. complex L (lit! Uofenno Lan- 
HUftH InotltutP, I'rwililld of Monterey, 
l.nllf. KiiBlnwfr Dint. Scrmi)iit<i, (Inllf, 



, 

Corp., IMlUburtth. l l . 13,818,730. 
tn-liiirfl A dsllvury of Ulntr KntCB 
with notwU A other nppurtoiinncit, tor 
lock* A ilams on the Arknnits Itlver Nnvl- 



KiiLlon 1'n.j.ict. KnKlni!i!r Dint., Mltlo 
llin'H, Ark. 

Missouri Hlvi-r ConNtrurtnrM. Inc., Dulliiu 
U'N. S],27.afi. Work nn l| )t , AlhtHhiiiiiiiil 
Klvt-i- ,V IrlbiiliirU-H (l-'li.dil CoiiLnil) I'n.j- 

vi i ( ' llil '" l .!:""" lj '' AH '- MiiKlnoi-r OfsU.. 
Virhiilninr, Mi. 

Mfthi 1C. [';iiy Comttruftloii Co., Wli'liltn 

K.... s HUH H7U. 1), ( Ilrny Dam ft It,,,,.,-. 

v.iii', (.uililo Utvisr. Ai-kniMMiH I'roJ,..'!, Clurk 

""' y KKln-'r DlHl.. VlrhHlmrn, 



..,1 H |,n'n |i*,- 
jiiir. Army Avliithm Mnit'i'lcl Ci.imimud, Ml. 

1 Cnrriip||ii Mrhlnorr Co.. Wl..rli. 

A,', 1 ,'; M' mi 7 ""',- i!1 ! l! l> " lltir "" ! "'I"''' 1 " 
liiiili Mlll)ll " )l I'-'litii.m.'iit Ci'iiu-r, Ml, 

!';i lll ' rn ' '"'Irl.lKc Con.., Minn,.,,,,,,!!,,, 
Mlrin. S(l,;t!t.ni. r,.r,l!mm nmm.tnlll.m. un,! 
[>r (ii.rni)(,,M anil iiiiiintouiiiiiti- n.-tlvjlir:i nl, 
l " [win IHI,.,! Army Atmmmillln l'l,,,iL 
Ni'w Urlithlitn, Minn. Ammunition I'r,,- 
nin'iiii.tit & Huimly Am-m-y, J t .||*.l, ||]. 

^"i'tV'..^"!.' 1 "^" Hnlt '" ll( " (! "y. >""i. 

M, .M.l.H. hiij.itll,-,! & m-rvln.!. lo miullfy 
fn'iiri-iint iiiiunll,. i'niii|i(itii.|itii. NiH-Hiwt'iil 

., ',' ........ 1 '" 1 !!'"', AKi-ti.iy, Diildnnil. Calif. 

M Mli'wnrt ,V HtiM-niHon Hi-rvki-H, Inc.. Ilouii- 
"". 'IVx 5!!,7H7.30fl. .I0<l-...vrl,. AC .,.,-- 
Hi 1 " llimiii " y M " llillly i>; "' ..... Ilrn1 <!iili. r . 

n', l ' 1 !"' r ! l r r M " lnrH ' ( "'vi'liiiiii 1 Oltlii, SH..l;i7 - 
i-l.l, Ififimin m.nllum, iirlf.|>ni|>i-lli>il In.wll- 
/;.' v..|il..| ( .|i (Mlllll). (Jlowliititl. Arr.w 
Wraiuniri Ci.ininiilnl, Hnrk I,i|niii|, 111 

II i i. V E ril !!r" Tn "' k <:ilr ".. I'ilmli-ii 
, IHHil.., N.Y, SI.UHlMiiil, Mil llrKllKlillntr 

Iriirlit. Army Miil.lliiy Kt,iil,mi.!iil tVnl,-r 
Ml. l.iinln, 

H.C.A., lltn-liiHtlnn, MIIIIH. Sfl.flM.mil). |(... 
iiciii-.-h iimi i1i)vi>lii|imi<nl ..ll'i.rl. Jala n-. 
i-iir.- i IIMI ,tn, .li.<-iim.inll m i. fiilirlfiitlitn 

!,,, I.'LII V 't'"" 1 , t;<ltl1111 " Hiiimorl Hyi. 
I'-mii {Jihlli'lituh, I,,,,,,.,. & '|',, w m | M ,,||,, 

vlll!.""Ala V " ..... "" (: " mm ''. ">I'V- 

'" 'm, l 'i'!r M!nn ! ltM . n ' lnf " Anhvllh-. N.C-. Jl.. 
(h,,\lh. Ui.'iii train, Mwannaii ..... N.H. Milui.. 
wood Anit'iuil, Mil. 

Amorii-an llnhl & Drrrlrk Co.. Mi, |- m ,| 
Minn. |7.M.llHfi. :><l r.n.irl, i.-n-ni.! air 
(i-iinii|iiir|i,|i|,. \vlii'i'l-miniiit,.(l i-niniNi. K,,i-t 

iStl!"'' Hi i l(ll ,1l, niiy M " lllll(y ''''I'lIl'iiH'iH 

nm l ( l 1 nN""",- H1 ' C V lt( ' ;<lt ' l V' I 1 ""'""'""", 1'n, St.- 

(Mi ' w"'. Kl "'!i lwl r f " r mmm """ 
(MM.!). Watcrvllcl. Ariu>n], N.V, 

(.fiiernl HUH Ti.nk Co., K.'i.liwlll,. N f! 

! W'V. m , ..... '" ll)l1 ' '""' ' v" '- Ar.ny 
M..WHIV I'.inli.tnonl (VnH-r, Hi. l,. m |,i 
Knyllit.ru, (,.i l,,.xliil!t.,n. MUM,,, S.l.mni.lllin, 
Itt'in-iifcli A ili-vt'lnimii'iil work im llic | m . 

W'^ ..... . Wk tnlltHll.. ,,y,, ( ,. ln . ll,.,If (lM . 

Mtim,, Army Mlnnlli. CoinmuiKl, Ht.nl'wIlK 

M" rr 5 l n .i ilwlrll ', > """""Kti.n, Vt. Jli.MH,. 
M. f.fl.imm nlri-rnfi nnu-lihu) K 'inn mid 
..rma,n.;nt ,mih KiAIIBH/A nnif XMItt" 

,,m,,'.'i v T' lft i"","l' ( ' ( !"'!'V 11 " 1 - ltlll ' k l"in.l A,- 

"I'nnl, Iturk [filnn.l, II], 

s'M.ll'iT 1 ,""' 11 ,"" I 1 ," 1 " "'" ..... ''"' WII. 

?.).rl..|KH . J.riiiMructlnn of iti'Hrntl iiiiriioim 
n.l liiinilrlly r<.mrllnl warHmmi., , 
fw r. ; l.>. ( jthn ,,f ,.xlntl,, ( , 1m ....... KH Ma' 

"' "'"""*" Knllln ' p 



Alrrrnfl, I.'nlh.rio, . 

;,',', yi'wVl'.u 1 ! l miiiilriitlii 
iiili. (AN/MHC W). Ki,l| mim . r(liy 

Mi!i'lr..nipfl (.,(1.1,11,1111(1, Kurt Mimmmiih. 



,. 

K " m<m<1 - IU ' K' 



lirtilce- 



(rtlc ' 



?. N.Y. $1,111.- 
r ' Hl '"' ""In (AN> 

tA). HyrnniBC. Army Klcetnmlcii 
Comninn.l, Fpt Mimimnith, N.J. 
[.TV Corn., WnrroH, Midi. (1.2015,000. Limit 



lndury Bulletin 



Itornnrtl McNennmy Contractor, Inc., Hi 
UtnrlfiM, Mo. |1 fi77,flpO. KnitkimklA Itlv.-r 
^"f'T.i 1 rojM !l, '";, ?tw cu ,i llul.lwln 
Loul AtlienB ' '" Knulnwr Dial., Hi. 

" N r J!i T ^ nil "' lor P or P." Il011 Aiiwl. *!,- 
UBC.I27. Hlmm projoctlicn. Htiulhwcut I'n . 
niironiont Anenoy, I'dsmlonn, Calif. 

J 8y S^'"".,L nCl ' V . nn NUM. CRllf. *2.. 
. flelntine nnj tuclintcnl oirnrt In 
of J.'Y 07 combttl Ocvoloitmont 

23 



fMnTiiiH'iiijuion. F"rt Onl, Calif. North- 
v.t ,t l'r(j."irt.-fiiL-nt Agency. Oakland, Calif. 
17 Vinndl Cnr|)., Alhambra, Calif, ll) A $2,- 
7:;-. To,-. Mdiliiicjitiim to a contract for de- 
.ii'Ji. pnji'iir.-nu'nl, anil rnnstrlicticjil of live 
I'livirii 1 :!! Iniui distribution system*. L<w 
AuKL-It-i. i-lo' ; i ami remainder in South 
Vi.-tiiinn. rJi A $3.i>jrj.uM), HoliUiriH of live 
T J i.-inktr* ris power ships for South Viet- 
ri.-irn. Army Mnljility Kiiuipmt'iit Center, St. 

Slanehud Container. Ino.. Montolair, N.J. 
^l.'t'iT.i^T. Ammunition boM'ri IM2A1 1. 
Hnnurvilk'. C,:,. r'rankfurrl Arsenal, Pbiln- 

Olin Malhieson Chemical Corp.. Kast Alton. 
111. Sl.r.tri.SfcT. ii.aiinim cartridge.-.-,. Frimk- 
fonl Ar.-ciial. Philadelphia. 
(lltn Malhiestin Chemical Corp., New Hav- 
en Conn. S7,y!<(j.227. T-fiSmm cartridjjes. 
Fr;mkford Arsorni!, Philadelphia. 
-Colls Inc., Hartford. Conn. 529,035,-I08. 
X.M-lliEl rilk-s. Army Weapons Command, 
IJiR'k Islam! Arsenal, Jtuck Island, III. 
-Srhillcr-l'feiffcr Machine Works, Inc. 
.Sii;iitiani]ito, Pa. ,*3,41S,70(I. 152mm high 
<'.\p!,)Mvt>. anti-tank projectile assemblies. 
Ficaiinny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 
--linno'Hell Inc.. Hopkins, Minn. $2,781 38' 
Hiiiim i-nrtridKe fiiKts. New Urtwhton. Minn. 
Ammunition Procurement and Supply 
AKt'iiey. Jolict, III. 

-Chrysler Corp., Warren, Mich. 51(1,647,460 
i Mi rtHitfh icrram. fork lift trucks. Warren 
Army Mobility Kquipment Center, St 
Luiiis. 

1- Remington Arms Co., Inc.. E!ri<! K eport. 
Urm .jjJi.aj.i.^. Small arms ammuni- 
tion. Lake City Army Ammunition Plant. 
Inilt'pemii'iicf, Mo. Ammunition Procure- 
.>, u-Y" i r" [ '" Iy A KOKJ'. Joliet. III. 
-I Whirlpool Corp., Evansville. Ind. $2,1 G!) - 
v>*. Mf-tnl pnrls for 105-mm projectiles 
hvrmville. Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, NJ 
JJ in Mnthieson Chemicnl Corp., New York 
City S13.7U8.382. Propellant charms "or 
artillery ammunition, and for operation 
ami maintenance activities at the Army 
Ammunition Plant. Chnrlestown, Ind Am- 
l"r r "t""ni Procilr(iment & Supply Asency, 
Consolidated ( Dicsel Electric Co., Stamford, 

Pm.rlT'w' 1 '' 1 NlY ;.^!'" 1) ' Tnnk Automotive 
^ U'liler, \Varren. Mich. 

tiueinj; Co., Mrton._ I' H . SS.OOO.HOO. CH-47 
Morton ^Arn^vi '.""I'^vemcnt program. 
mnn<l ki T VIH * lon Materiel Com- 

~?B n i lllV n W "i tch Co>> Flu8h lnir. N.Y. 31.113- 
MG1 Development of the XM552. 30m^ 

F o^,- n e , X|ll< i^ Ve - ' lual I'I"> cartrldR^ 
LcTour l '*, a "nny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 

di'lnr ..!!;,. 'i_.i "." lorlz e(l road craders. In- 



-Olin Mothieson Chemical Corp., New I-Inv 

P! A" J 2i * M : ]^ A &. 
tv^lf S , mm '"rtriflffcs. La Porte Ind 
Frankford Arsenal. Phibdelphin. 

~"'" 



232,3-18. Man-packed radio seta (AN/PRC- 
7-1 1. Fullerton. Southwest Procurement 
Agency, Pasadena, Calif. 

Hell Helicopter Co., Fort Worth, Tex. $!,- 
liOO.BBO. Airframe striiciurtil components 
for UII-1 helicopter modification kits. 
Fort Worth. Army Aviation Materiel Com- 
mand, St. Louis. 

PMC Corp., San Jose, Calif. 81,028/135. 
Metal parts for flOmm projectiles (XMH94). 
San .lose. Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 
Whirlpool Corp., Evansville. Ind. 82,004,- 
'172. i'Umm canister assemblies (XMTiilSI, 
Evansville. Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 
NorUirop Corp., Anaheim, Calif. S2,OGG,- 
-158. ilOmm canister assemblies IXMfiOS). 
Anaheim. Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 
23 UHS Corp., Hurlinirame, Calif. S2,l-tH,f)34. 
Technical reports, computer programs, & 
test plans for automation of selected log- 
istics, personnel and administrative func- 
tions for the combat service support sys- 
tem. Fort HiiRchiica. Ann. Army Elec- 
tronics PrnviiiB Ground, Fort Hniicliucn, 
t.cnera! Dymimics, i'omona, Uahl, (1) 
51,529,200. KiiBincorinB services for the 
rjicket motor for Redeye: (2) $1, 107,311. 
Test sets for Redeye. Pomona. Southwest 
Procurement Asency, PaHadenfi, Calif. 
Mclma, Inc., Stamford, Conn. S2,7!)0,04G. 
Feleidione-teleisraph terminals | AN/TCC-- 
2fl). Stamford, Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Philadelphia. 

Pacific Ventures. Inc. & West Const Elcc- 
nr'ft Waslli nston, Seattle, Wanh, SL'IOO,- 
UOO. UpBradmB improving Defense Com- 
munication., power plants in Alaska, En- 
Bineer Dial., AnchoraRe. Alaska. 
urn Inc.. Pittsbur B h, Pa. $24,377,2(14. 
Newbcrith Lock & Dam, Ohio River Proj- 
ect Evansville, Ind. Engineer Dial Louis- 
ville. Ky. 

General Motors, Detroit. 81.866,308. En- 
Kines for M113 vehicles IGVG3). Detroit. 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Warren, 
ft! ten, 

General Electric, Hurllnfilon, Vt. $],- 
I^'/ii 11 ' 7 ' li2mm "ircraft machine nuns '& 

~i^^S' A f^^ wmCam ' 

A ^si.Iv?ir E s^Hlr^ 

4 Chrysler Motors, Detroit. 34,502,279 1411 
one-ton carp trucks and 75 one-ton am- 
bunncea. Warren Mich Project Manner, 
C.enernl Purpose Vehicles, Army Mobility 
Command, Warren, Mich, 
rlT^Q^ " nnr ' Corp., Now York City. $10 - 
f,, A , illcl1 l ' oc] X warheads and 

f IMS. Army Ammunition Plant, Shrove- 
4 i.V,l A Atr "niraition Procurement ami 
supply Afiency, Joliet, 111 

Mason & Hanger, Silas Mason Co. lnc 
LmbT'T 1 K V 1 4 '".0- MO and 7BO Jb 
pCnt ' f, n S '} K , C1 ' , Army Ammiinlllon 
iant, C,rand Island, Neb. Ammunition 
Procurement and Sup.dy Asoncy? Jolft 

Hercules Inc., WilmiiiKton, Del. 8.326,- 
opennnta. tmnflowcr Army Ammii- 
wrence. Kan. Ammunition 




t . . 

ment traner fi C \& ^ C !n ? lr " 
tiun Comman... S tLoS r ' h ' Army Avia 
i.aoot Corp., Pnmiia. Tex Si 901? tiv , 

^;a.S;^i'--- 

tvaniawa Ru Idem i nn nVi.. 

Hawaii. S1.024 OGO PW W *!"f wa - Ollhu - 

SS. ^-S*i!5STfcK 

So ier qi?? 1 Co ' p " Toie(l - Ohio sins 

BtkM , r "SrT ^"r 5 

Center, W nr r cn ^ Tank Automotive 



I!l5?200 r . Wo^Ton^niT" J i oblle - , Aln - 91.- 
D.m, Alabama, Project. Cnmrton AU ^" fl 
Bineer Dist. Mobile. Ala ' En " 



-.n C ' , 

~ 



24 



Wea,,on a ComMand'&l", 

lnml in k lB!an<l Arsenal, 

Aircraft, FuHerton, CMIf. tt . 



Electronics ~ u 

Jnckes-Evans Mfg. 

272. Metallic belt 



Loai> 



. 

Kaiser Jccii Corp., Tolcdn ni,- 
083; 828,fi80,fi08i ind siQ d ; 
truckH with Government fn^ ? ' fl3 ,- 
Toledo and S.n.th llSSd I * 

acp. General Pu 



27 




G'liernl KlMtric. Rod I tlulk , NJ , s 

r"^^;^^^^ 

mX ST"" 1 "'" " S&lfij 



' 

~Mln ,""'2 im r 2S!>""f S""" ' M ""* 
mini. ^.IMA^UO. fi.GBmm amiiiuniiinr 

ntT'l'"^' A ''T A '"' l "t'n P " - 
nient & Supply Aprcncy, Joliet, III 

~fm?% n i M?\m' 41 IIB<I ? Div " Intoi"^ 

K iV > r n- S.^: 

H ' A """ ^""'"^veCenle,..^. 



r,,.,', i! ' 1 ! 1 ';'""Y' i Trimamission nssemlli.:: 
f<u trnekoti vehicles. Indianapolis. Arm f 
lank-Aulomotlvf Center, Warren, Mich 
-fieneral Motors, Allison Dlv., Iiidianaiwli' 
Ind. S3, 1.17,000. Traimmission aascmWa 
for tan ka. Imlinnnpolia. Army Tnnk Mile 
motivo (,nn(i>r, Warron, Mich, 
r.nj li'u -?" 1 * 1 "nfvster Co., Chlcnjio. Jl,- 
\, ... , k , ' 1 ' c t<>' l a. I'Virt Wayne, Ir.l 
Mil" Automotive Center, Warren. 

"nro /n 1 ' 1 ," 1 '* ^" Allenlown, Pa. Sl,6"{, 
1;,', .. '," ^'" c!c nxlc 80(H - Allentown. 
Micl, " ' A ' U(>nl(>tlvc Center, Warns. 

<"ttrn., Snn Jose, Cfilif. $4,793.55*. 

IwrHonnel carriers and M6JS cant 
earrierH. South Chni-lcaton. W. Va. Amu 
v." ,V l ' lt "nHve Cimlcr, Warron, Mich. 
Vinnell Corp., Alhambra, Calif. $l,J22,liS5. 
hlcotricnl ,[,! distribution system ftr 
Vietnam Vietnam nnd Los Anselcs, Calil. 
Army Mobility KquJpment Center, SL g 

Vinnell Corp.. Allmmbra, Calif. 82,318,35?. 
Aetivation of T-2 oil tnnkers for operatic.! 
?? i V, 1 " 1 ' 1 , 1 ? l" lwcl ' In-ldKcs. Seattle, Wash.. 
, ' ,; Ai(l1 ; Jacksonville, Fin.; and Nw- 
liort Novvs, Vn. Army Mobility Eqiiijwn! 
Center. St. Louia, Mo. 
Vinnell Corp., Allmmbra, Calif. $1,9BO,OD1 
Construction and operation of a msw 
tonanne facility in South Vietnam. Amff. 
Mobility Equipment Center, St. Louis. 
nnlt i lRton University, St. Louts. $1.01H> 1 - 
UOO, Hoseni-ch in micromodular compiilff 
Bystcnis, St. Loula. Defense Supply Serviw. 
WaahlnKton, D.C. 

JJ*, llt ' ( ' n - Mn ' 1 iettn 1 Itnltimore, Md. S2,C3-I,- . 
wM. Demolition kits. Dnltimore. Picntiniii ;. 
Arsenal. Dover. N.J. 

Frequency RnfflnecriiiK LnLoratorks, 
I't-nniliiKtlnlo, N.J. SG,374,GIC. AN/GRC-5) 
railio aelH. PraminKilnlc, Army Electronfci . 
Command, Philadelphia. ; 

,," nn(lio DIv - of CMC, Kokomo, Ind 
81,483,150. AN/PRT-4 radio transmitters ^, 
and AN/PRR-0 vndio recelvora. Kotamo.^ 
Army Electronics Gommnnd, Philfiitelpln 
i ti !i 1 J, f(lr<l IIn 'vcrsity, Palo Alto, Calil. 
?1,403,B01. Research of advance informa- 
tion processing. Palo Alto. Defense Siil'l* 
Service, Washington, D.C. 
-Norris Tliermndor Corp,, Los Angela. 
516,348, 43fi. 81mm niul COmm projcctlls* 
and 106mm cartridge eases. River Bant 
Army Ammunition Plant, Ilivcr Hani 

Julv 1966 



Calif. Ammunition Procurement & Mup- 

lily Agency, Jolict, 111. 

Continental Motors Corp., Muskegon, Mich, 
SI 1,1 39,3-12. Five-ton truck multi-fuel 
engines, Muskegon. Project Manager, 
General Purpose Vehicles, Army Mobility 
Command, Warren, Mich. ' 

Kaiser Jeep Corp., Toledo, Ohio. $47,175.- 
6-12. Five-ton trucks. South Hcnd, Tnd. 
Project Manager, General Purpose Vehi- 
cles, Army Mobility Command, Warren, 
Mich. 

28 Electronic Assistance Corp., Hcil liank, 
N.J, S1.03C.122. Radio receivers. Hoc] Bank. 
Army Electronic!! Command, Philadelphia. 

Kniscr Jeep Corp., Toledo, Ohio. $4,473,- 
823. 5-ton wreck et-H, South Bend, Inil. Proj- 
ect Manager Genernl Purpose Vehicles, 
Army Mobility Command, Warren, Mich. 

Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc., Wilming- 
ton, Del. S14,713,GI3. TNT unit O&MA ac- 
tivities, Volunteer Army Ammunition 
Plant, Chatt!! nooEa, Tctin. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliel, 
111. 

Olin Mathicaon Chemical Corp., New York 
City, 820,113,830. Propellants for small 
arms and rockets and O&MA activities. 
Badger Army Ammunition Plant, Haraboo, 
Wis. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Murphy Brothers, Inc., Spokane, Wanli. 
SS,7B4,427. CoiiHtructiori on the Port Neuf 
Rive-i 1 , Pocatello. lilaho, Local Proti'e.lion 
Project. Pocalcllo, Unnlncer DliH,, Wai In 
Walla, Wash. 

List & Clark Construction Co., Overland 
Pnrk, Kan. $3,01)1), 07!), Perry Dum and 
Reservoir, Perry, Kans., Project, Comple- 
tion of dam embankment, Engineer Dint., 
Kansas City, Mo. 

Galingnn Dredging Corp., Tampa, Kin. 
$1,32-1,220. Galveslon Harbor and Channel 
Project. Galveston, Tex. Knuinour Dint,, 
(Jalveston, Tex. 

SoitthenHt Drilling, Denver, Colo, jil.aill,- 
622, ClaHBifleil conHlrucllon. Worli will be 
done al a classified (ireu. Army Enginem- 
Division, Mediterranean. 

Halliburton Enterprises, Inc., Los Ange-les. 
SI, (Hill, 1)68. Mono-palf containers for Ited- 
cyc missiles. I,OH Angeles. Ai'my Missile 
Comtmtml, Redstone Arsenal, Hunlsvilli', 
Aln. 

Harvey Aluminum, Inc., 'I'orrance, Cnlif 
81,664,168. 40mm, MICH, metal parts. 
Torrancc. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Joliet, III. 

Eagle HiiKincerinft Corp., Louisville, Ky. 
SUK1.944. Military standard small englno 
generator seta. Louisville. Army Mobility 
Kqnipment Center, Si. Louis, 

Hamilton Watch Co., J.aneaiitor, Pa, S-l,- 
fiUG.Gli. Fiiesis for artillery ammunition. 
Lancaster. Ammunition Procurement & 
supply ABCiicy. Joliut, 111. 

Injtrntmm Co,, DriBlol, Conn. $3,OG2,r>00. 
HUSKS for artillery ammunition. Bristol. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agon- 
cy, Joliet, III. 

"ISftfln P S rl Vlntrlct, .Stockton, Calif. 
WJG.OSB. Stevedoring services. Western 
Area, Military Tranic ManiiBomont & 
lorminn] Services, Oakland, Cnllf. 

ulr" 6 ^"' Illc " Hopkins, Minn. $1,6211,- 
BH6. I'liMS > XM218 (londod): K rcnado as- 
scmb IBS, M40. New Hv! K }iton, Minn. Am- 
Joliet ill Proouron " tl & Supply Agency, 
Western Electric, New York Cltv 

& Zl ft 1 1", lnllnllon < Nike Uerculea 
modification kits. Classified CONUS and 

.n?ri, ( CIlUon i?' Army Mi HH ile Com- 
"'find, IlGdatonc Arsenal, Huntnvillc, Ala. 
-.rummnn Air Engineering Corp., Long 
nv Wi*' V' 240 ' 000 ' Modlllcntlon fl on 1C 
iXml *l? v!' "" c ''"{ 1 - , r!ctl > l'*ff, r ' 
m ,m ' K A ? my AvinUrn Material Com- 
imimi, St. Louis. 

~ nerin(ori) " Wnl(!rl(10 ' 'own. !,- 



C ,- Inc " Providence, It. I. 
n ' -i 1 .' 1 ftfl emblies for fuzes, 
f60mm projoetllc). Providence. Amm mi- 
Uon Procurement & Supply A^Jney Joliel, 

o'oo nC Fn' ^Tn" Ho "*in". Minn. $24,9BC,- 
A ' (d mm P^oeUlo). Twin Cities 

11011 Phmt ' Ncw Brlffhton, 



Fort 



R.C.A., Camden, N.J. S3,95B,918. Radio 
if.h, ^N/GHC-BO). radio relay seta f and 
liBht wciBlit Bround aels. Cnnulen. N.J, 

on i' r '? 11 ' ^lectronica Command, Pliiladeliibia. 

29-1 niversity of Micl,i Bn n, Ann Arbor. Mich. 
?il \V; ;, Ia ;nle'anco and opcrali.jn of 
ine mt. Jlaleakala observatory in Maui 
Hawaii. Ann Arbor, Mich, and Mnui. 
Umlj'i' CI1HO Hl| l'!'ly Service, Wnshin B - 

"~?A nd ,V ri1 - S!intil Monica, Calif. $1,329,- 
,1- ; , I ' cs V' l '' dl ln'OBi-am of potenlial con- 
(nets likely to arise in the next 10 years 
Santa Momea. Defense Supply Service, 
WiiNhiuKLon, D.C. 

Hand Corp., Santa Monica, Calif. $3,402- 
\'i(>. Iheorctica! eonceptual studies of ad- 
vanced military weapon systems and com- 
jionents. Santa Monica. Defense Sunnly 
hei-viue, Wnshinjrton. D.C. 

--Southwest Truck Body Co., St. Louis. 
M, 077, ISO. Semi-trailers. West Plains 
M ,"- Al ''"y , Tank Automotive Center, 
Warren, Mich. 

...... Houllnvcst Truck Hotly Co., St. Louis 

S2,S67,S87, Hcml-trallers. West Plains, Mo. 
Army lank Automotive Center, Warren, 
Mich. 

">',', ?,; n Fcr ,? ll , 8I) ! 1 ,, Co " G levetaii<l. Ohio. $1,. 
.1-11,700. Uehnbihtation of the Cleveland 
Army lank Automotive Plant. Engineer 
Dint.. Liinisville, Ky. 

Hernard MrMctiamy Cnntractor, Inc., St 
Uiares, Mo. S1,KOD,400. Work on the 
hiiy Island Levee Drainage District, It each 
#.l I'lood Control Project. KuK'inoer Dist., 
Koi;k Inland, III. 

--I'etUbonc Mnllikcn Corp., Chicano ' S3 - 
(100.000. r,,000-lon truck-i. ChicaRti Army 
Molulily Equipment Center, St. Louis. 

"~t l i/r-,,, < T ;" r| V > Slm J(1H( -'' Catif $2,4.18,600. 
AftUHlllU Hawk loader TransporterH. San 



s, Tex 



( fense Industry Bulletin 



J<mi-. Army Tank Automotive Center, 
Warren, Mich. 
(tar wood Industries, Inc., Wayne, Mich. 

Sl.710.BfiO. Assemblies and sub-assemblies 

for trucks. Wayne. Army Tank Automo- 

tive Center, Warren, Mich. 
-(Jciicral Motors. Ponliae, Mich. $5,040,202, 

I millac. Assemblies find Hub-assemblies Cm 

trucks. Manslleld, Army Tank Automotive 

(jt'iiler, Warren, Mich. 
--Manslifld Tire & Rubber Co., Manjtlleld 

Ohio Sl.484.102. Tires for li K ht trucks! 

MniiHlli'ld. Army Tank Automotive Center, 

Warren, Mich. 
--Holt UrotlicrH, Stockton, Cnlif. S2,273,S20. 

Oenerator SelH, Stockton. Army Mobility 

I'.qulpmunt Center, St. Louis. 
Hud Kivcr Army Depot, Tuxarakana, Tex. 

S7.HOO.OOO, CiHiversion of M103A1 t units to 

M10A2. Army Weapons Command, Hock 

Island Arsenal, l]|. 

II KH Siiificr, Inc., State Collcnu, Pn. S4 . 
liHI.URS. AN/AAS -HA infrared deteeline 
sets, part of AN/UAS -4A infrared surveil- 
lance system. Stale College. Army Elec- 
tronics Command, Philadelphia. 

General Dynamics ICIectronlcs, Kochosler, 
N.Y. ?4,OHG,700. Itadio teletypewriter 
sets. Rochester. Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Philadelphia. 

Uaylhcoti Co., Lexington, Mass. 2,074,710. 
Guidance and control system fov Hawk. 
LcxiiiBlon. Army Missile Command, Red- 
stone Arsenal, Huntavlllc, Aln. 

'--General Motors, Allison IMv., Indianapolis, 
Ind. $l,780,(i-JO. Breech mechanism asi- 
aumbliea for 162 mm nun/launcher. Indinn- 
aiioliw. Watcrvliot Arsenal, N,Y. 

- (iencral Motors, Allison Dlv., Intlianapolis, 
Ind. $1,784,S03, lirecch mechnnism aHsem- 
blics for Biin/launuher MCOA1K1 tank tur- 
ret. Indianapolis. Watervliet Arsenal, N.Y. 

Alcan Aluminum Corp., Riverside, Calif. 
St, 319,827. MB4 rocket motors. Riverside. 
Southwest Procurement Agoncy, Paaailenn, 
Calif. 

Plillco Corp., Newport Beach, Calif. $G,- 
4BH.702. Six montha industrial onRlneorlnK 
aervcies for the Shillelagh Misaile. Newport 
lleach. Southwest Procurement Agency. 
Pasadena, Calif. 

Sperry Rniut Corp., Phoenix, Aria, $3,200,- 
000. Radio magnetic compasses. Phoenix. 
Southwest Procurement Aftoncy, Pasadena, 
Calif, 

Stevens Mfg. Co., Ebonsburg, Pn. $1,840,- 
CiZH. Two-wheel cm-go trailers, M410. 
EbcnsburK. Army Tank Automotive Center, 
Warren, Mich. 

Johnson Corp., Helleville, Ohio. 53,090,505. 
Carjro trailers, M105A2. Belleville. Army 
Tank Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 

General Dynamics, Snn DJCBO, Calif. 
$1.300,000. Range measurement system 
toatinB with troops at Fort Ord, Calif. 
NorlhwcBl Procurement Agency, Oakland, 
Calif. 



~E ?r,^ l n (ic Janitn rinl Service. Atlanta, Ga. 
1 * ?' ,' ICP Ser viccs in 14 mess halls 
at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Md. Aber- 
deen I'l-oving Grounds, Md 

*i ino S! > J 1Btr !" ! " 0n C " M'">Hfmcry, Ala. 
i, i. 1 ,! '' h<lse tu '" llf <-'" truet ion and 
rchabili aUon of U.S. Army Training Cen- 
ters. Tort HraHE, N.C. Engineer Dist., 
Savannah, (In. 

R.C.A., Camdon, N.J. S3.800.4SO. Portable 
manpack FM radio sets. Camilea. Army 
Electronics Command, Philadelphia. 

InffraliBin Co., llristol, Conn. 1,252,304 
Metal )i (1 rts for the 4.2 mortar. Hristol. 
Ammunition I'roeurornent & Supuly Agon- 

Honeywell, Inc.. Hopkins, Minn. 5B.389.20B 
HIKCS. New Brighton, Minn. Ammunition 
1 roi-urement & Supjdy Agency. Joliel. Ill 

General Time Corn., Aeronctlcs Uiv., 
Stamford, Conn. Sl,BEfi,084. liomb fusses 
and metal ,,arts. Ciadsden, Ala. Ammuni- 
timi Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 

~Ho?n"', e "' lnc " H 1' k is, Minn. S2,4(iil,143 
M,,!, ( l ' Kt '' t ' ( '9 m l loll ets of cluster bomb 
units. New Brighton, Minn. Ammunition 
1 1 KJLMi-enicnt & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

" a. T l . nilllstr "'s. Carter Cnrburelor Div.. 
ri\ T"' * 2 - !tG8 ' (ll)0 - I'nwa and melal 
paits for 8l mm mo riai-. Olivette. Mo 



30 Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. S2.201.000 

Materials research program. Ilhnca. Dc- 

ffiifie Supply Service. 
---irniversity of Illinois, Champagne-Urbana, 

III. 54,201,000. Materials research pro- 

gram. Urbana. Defense Supply Service. 
Brown University, Providence, R.I. $],<i4G,- 

250. Materials research program. 'Provi- 

dence. Defense Supply Service. 

n ,! r l ty of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 

W.fiUU.OOO. Materials research program 

Philadelphia. Defense Supply Service. 
University of Chicago, Chicago, 111. $T,- 

IGG.OOO. Materials research program. 

Chicago, Defense Supply Service. 
Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif. $],- 

2715,000. Materials research program. Palo 

Allo. Defense Supply Service. 

~Ti Ji 1 ! w ,r tcni llnivcrsi t>'. Evanston, 111. 

M.dli-I.HUO. Materials research pi'ogram 

Iwanslon. Defense Supply Service. 
M.I.I., Cambridge. Mass. $2,200,000. Mn- 

lorinls research program. Cambridge, De- 

fense Supply Service. 

.1. If. Pomeroy & Co. and M-H Contracting 
Co., San I-'rancisco. $^,000.000. Run way 
improvements at Kadcna Al-'B, Okinawa 
Engineer Dial.. Okinawa. 

I-iirmers Chemical Association, Tyner 
lenn. S3.727.0SO. Manufacture of TNT 
Chattanooga, Teiin. Ammunition Procure- 
m , L ',. & Supply Agency , Jolict, 111. 

,Jr r Cori> " Newport Beach, Calif. $1,- 
i'i'ii, , ' L A diti na] equipment for the 
Shillelagh missile. Newport Beach. Army 
Missile Command, Huntsville, Ala 
, ^ Ct ;r p '' N ? w l">i't Beach, Calif. 1,- 
024,800 .Research and development in sup- 
port of the Shillelagh missile ays torn. New- 
port leach Army Missile Command. 
Ilunlsville, Ala. 

~1?i D %7i!l nil ' 1 T, Co ? p " ^ alt Lflke Cits '' utah - 

4i,i.i,i,ui.(. tiiBincerinB services for the 
Sergeant miasile Hyslem. Salt Lake City. 
Army Missile Command, Huntsville, Aln 

7nft y n Sl ind t , Corp ' 1 Sllh . L(lke G ^- Utnh. 
S-l, 700,000. Sergeant missile body section 
jiiid control surface assemblies. Salt Luke 
City. Army Missile Command, Huntsville 
Ala. ' 



nnn " - cli - .- 

000,072 Increased production improvement 
for UH-1 helicopters. Tarrant County, 
lex. Army Aviation Materiel Command, 
HI. Louis. 

~~!?; V , C0 . 9 orp " Stratford, Conn. 2,034,035 
Materials and services for CY GG produc- 
tion improvement program on UH-1 heli- 
con era. Stratford. Army Aviation Mate- 
rieh Command, St. Louis. 

AVCO Corp., Stratford, Conn. 22,107,483 
Jingmes for UH-l helicopters. Stratford! 
Louis ' n Mtlteriel Command, St. 

General Motors, Allison Div., Indianapolis 
nd $1,012,204. Engines for LOH Sntl'. 
Indianapolis Army Aviation Materiel 
Command, St, Louis. 

~"5 I r rVe V? lfSp * Co " Wa8l >i>BKm. D.C. S1.511,- 
2GG. Aircraft propeller and rotor wing 
balancing equipment. Caldwell, N.J. Army 
Aviation Materiel Command, St. Louis 

~E nit ^ (l Aircraft, Sikorsky Aircraft Div., 
Stratford, Conn. $7,500,000. CII-54A 
heavy lift cargo helicopters. Stratford. 

25 



Army Aviation Materiel Command, St. 
I,<>i]N. 

-Bfll Helicopter Co., Kurt Worth, Tex, SL- 
(ill 20(1. (!i>n figuration change to U1MD 
iiml Ult-IH utility ht>l:ei)ptcrs. Fort Worth. 
Army Aviaiiuii Materiel Command, St. 
Lmiis. 

Hoeing Co.. Vtrlol Div., Morton, Tn. S3,. 
Mrt.lSL 1 . C1M7 (Chinook) spare jiarts. 
Miirton. Army Aviation Materiel Cum- 
mnnrl. Si. Louis. 

-Bell Helicopter Co., fort Worth, Tex. $9.- 
WT.-m. UH-IH and TJH-lD utility heli- 
fojiter!!. Port Worth. Army Aviation 
Mntfriel (.'uminnnd, St. Louis. 
1'nited Aircraft, Sikorsky A/C Div., Strat- 
ford, Conn. $2,000,0(11). Training devices 
fnr CH51A heavy lift tar go helicopters. 
Stratford. Army Aviation Materiel Com- 
mand, St. Louts. 

[Ireiina Construction Co., Salt Lnke City, 
Utah. SI, 211, Otiii, Tower grid rnoderimn- 
lion. Diifjway Proving Cround, Utnh. En- 
gineer Dint., Sat rumen lo, Calif, 
Hughes Aircraft, Culver City, Calif. $3,- 
OSs'.OOO. Advanced ^reduction engineering 
<,n TOW. Tucson, Ariz, Army Missile 
Command, Himtsville, Ala. 
J. II, Beers, Inc.. Hnnpor, Pa. 81,428,611. 
Wurk on thp Hellsville Dam and Reservoir 
Project. Lenienton. Pa. Engineer Dial., 
Philadelphia. 

Bonen-McLauehlln-Yorli, York, Pn. $1,- 
531,000. Utility truck platforms, Ynrk. 
Array Tank Automotive Center, Wnrron, 
Mich. 

North American Aviation, Anaheim, Calif, 
fl, 331, Gfii). Autonmtic data processing fa- 
cility. Anaheim and Washington, D.C. 
Army Maji Service, Corns of Engineers. 
Sltvena Mfg. Co., Ebensburs, Pa, 81,268,- 
219. Cargo trailers and chassis. Ebensburt; 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Wnrron, 
Mich. 

Continental Motors, Muskcgon, Mich. $3- 
577,100. Encine assembly with tank con- 
tamers. Musltegon. Army Tnnk Automotive 
Center, Warren. Mich. 

~ a ^! a H S , I * r ,,, Bady ' Inc " Ii(we City, Mich. 
H.fiDS.Sil. Water tank trucks. Rose City, 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Warren 
Mich. 

N. II. Splnks, Sr., Ent., Inc., Fort Worth 
Tex JI.OGUS8. IIH-1 utility helicopter 
scats, forth Worth, Army Aviation Ma- 
teriel Command, St. Louis. 

le ',- c -' Ssn DiDB0 ' 

" KlIla "' Power imits 
A i , elieo l**rs. San Diego. Army 
Aviation Materiel Command, St. Louis 
Boeing Co., Vertol Div., Morton Pa S2 
9(0,000. Rate tooling applicable 'to CH-47 



Assusa, Army Aviation Materiel Command' 

bt. LOUIS. iiminmi, 

-Raytheon Co., Lexington, Muss. 53,600000 
~K''^*. H,. ,1,600.000. 



r--. , ' *n=AiiiBni, mass, si ,uOQ 001 

S-1---HS. 

HuSviiieS; Amy Mia3ile -*: 

EnBin EDn ' C " L exinBton ' M OSS. 31,762,116. 






Philadelphi 



ft: 



tv 






. 
Philadelphia . 



A rmy 



s s b outh PasBdenfl ' 

l | 1 8. South 
lron 'a Command, 



Collins Radio Co., Dallas, Tex. $l,7fi.|,10S. 
lindio Sets. RichiirdMoii, Tex. Army l>!luc- 
ti-onics Commnnd, Philadelphia. 

fleneral Motors, IndiiinniMiIiH, Ind, 81,012,- 
H.'iH. Transmissions used in the M107, Mllfl 
and J1578 vehiolea. IndifinaiiollH. Army 
Tank Automotive Coniur, Warren, Mich. 

Instiliitp of Defense AiuilynlH, ArliiiKlon, 
Va. S2,-ir)G,!IKIi. Research surveys und iiniil- 
,v.siii. ArliiiBton. DI'^HHP Su|i]dy Service, 

Institute of DefciiMc AiiiilyHis, Ai'litiKton, 
Va, Research mill analysla on military and 
scientific ciijiabilities, ArliiiBton. DefuiiMo 
Su|i|ily Service. 

Itowen-Mi'Laushlin-Vork, Inc., York, 1'it. 



, 

& vehicles. York. Army Tank Automotive 
Center, Warren, Mich. 

Chrysler Molars, Detroit. !$7,'i<i3,lilM. CarjfO 
trucks. Detroit. Army Tank Automotive: 
Center, Warren, Mich. 

Microdot, Inc., South Pamidcnii. Calif. 
Moflulntiiin calibrnlor. South I'limicletni. 
I'rankfonl Arsenal, Pliiladeliihia. 

General DynnmicH, Pomona, Cnlif. .? 1,2.17.- 
000. Line items of ma in to nance einiinmeiit 
anddoeiimontalion for dejiot rubnild ciijm- 
bilities for Tiiolo Denot. Pomona. Army 
Missile Command, Iledslonc ArHonnl, 
linn Is vi lie, Aln. 

Pace Corn., Memphis, Tonn. $l,l]K,ia2. 
bnrfnco trin (lure, MJHA1. Momiihis. Am- 
munition Procurement & Suiiply Auuncy, 
.foliet, 111. 

""E",! 1 ^ I{ ?'"?- Co " Hichiird.Hi>n. TVs. -5.1,- 
08D.OSJ. Radio HelH. UichardHon. Ai-my 
iMccirorncs Commnnd, Vmt, Monmoulh, 
N.J, 

"E^ l ^ a 1{(l '"" Co - Hichiivdson, '['os. ,$.!,- 
17,641. Itnrlio seln. Richardson. Ai-iuy 
iilwtronics Commnnd, Kurt Monmoulh, 

fl .J- 

Sslvaiiin Electric I'mdutlN, Inc., Moun- 
tain View, Calif. SI, 500,000. ClnsHillcd 
electronics equinnicnt. Moiintiiin View. 
Army hlec Ironies Commnnd, Fort Mun- 
mouth, N.J. 

~io!/l f .? D ^i"".", N wiioi-t Iteach, Calif. Sl,- 
Ttl o ft'f'r'T * wntrol eomiumontH 
for the Shillelauh Missile Bj'sloni. Newport 
Hewn. Army Mbflila CiHnmniitl, ItcdHlono 
Arsuiml, Hiiutnville, Ala 
Continental Motors Corp., Minda-iron 
Mich gl.88!Kloa. KnRlnoB for thu MliO tn ! 
wSe^Ml^'" 11 ' ^'^ A ^ m "^ nt,.i-, 

w^iftniF ; 1 >Vor J 01 ! )iv " Mol ' t() ". I'"- 
lill IH t l "? ntt *}M the urmluclmn e }m . 
A i,v A f ' r' e C ,! M7 n>"-nft. Mortl.n. 
Louis Amtl " n M "^i'iul Command, Ht. 

Intermit lona I Tclciilionc & Tclcfrranli 

Cy ' J ' 



H!- ,, ( Calif. ?2.- 
UUd.^67. Radio acts. Ku orloti, Army Elm. 
romcs Commnnd, Philadelphia V ^ 

b 



H r !' tomot ^ e Center, Wn Ten Mi h 
rP " anion ' Ohl " 



obility Command, 



I * ltor S or "" v on, Oallf. 



774 



' i OUIS. 81.640 - 

uKca - OHvotto Mo. 



White Motflr Corp,, [_ a ., 

MfiM) vnliifllcH! ll l! B nsi* n ' J p '-!;( 
fjonci-jil Piinjusc Vehicle/'?" 

fiull Hlli?nplcr Co.', fvj. u, 
Anny 'AvinMon Mat*f j ' c ^ 

Aiiicrlnin Mn chine & p,.. 
lyn, N.V. S-1,7H-1,938 J, 'lt' 
Ilrffiiklyn. Aninni'iiiijL '''''' 
Snjijily Aci'iidy, Joljd in 

Sylvfliiin Klcrlrir I'todmi. 
iimi, I'jt. Sl,]ii4,(iill). FM,:. I: i.- 
I'iccitjnuy A- -' - " 



26 



Itiiytlipini C.'n,, Hrislo], TH- r 
lininh fiu-Ks. Hrfatol. f'uiii-.,, 
Dovi'r, NJ. 

Miilnroln, Inr., Chicngo j; i|( ... 
fiiKo. ChlcjifH). 1'ii-ntlimr Ar-i-j' 

- -FJttpHlinip Tlr* & Hiibtti Co li 
SI.13a.U-i7. <:umlint | nn fe/' j-V 
Akron. Wiiturvllut Arsenal Vy 

-Xt'iiilli Itntllu <!or|i,, Chicafo V : 

Honili fuaiw. t'lik'nuo. Pj; s ii". 
Iliivur, N..I, 

..... Ht!A, I. n HIM nl in-, I'n. SI,OJ(ii;,;;'. 
li'iinifii'1' ii-'^u'inlilii'a. LaiicBiiH,').. 1 
ti'iiiiii-rt Ciirmmmii, !'( MMC-.-'I 

-Viu-n lin?,, (ifli'ljuiil, T, H/"", 1 

liKlil iK-oinijt, Ciarlnmt. Arnj-'l 1 -- 
Onrmnaml, !-Virt Monninmh, jj 

- ..... HCA, Itiirliniclon, Mnss. !!,>;.'. 

1 1 m< u] It'll iiiiiiiid'iiimcomilomti'vi 
nit-Hi flHMATK). lliirliujtoi. i"- : 
troiili'H Cdiiiimjind, I-'ori Mi^ '' 

Ciimitllnn Cciniinrrclal Corp,,(j-ir" 
iicliL, ?3,B!l t llM. TNT. ViV' 
MirMnHl<frvil!i>. ()iicl). AK. -v 
in'nu>nt * Sillily AKOIKJ'. J .;' 

- 1. 1). IVfHttiim C'(im|]oncnti, In,;- 
N.Y. Sl,(irH,ri2;.. Itetm w! 
iltfloiiiitorH, fJmSitiliiii, All. ILU 
I'niuumm'iil. ,"i Kuiiply AKB:)',,'!: 

-Kiiicrxun Ulw-lrtr Co., St. U|.: 

Kixilti't mntiii-if; jiwlMtnl tiA i:;:- 
Kiirvlrm off (Itmr.Ht John Slki 
Loiilii. Aniiv Mfanllo Gimr.!!.!.!: 
Anifliiiil, Umiltivilte, Ah, 

1(, (i. l.cTuiirilCJlll, Ill(,, l;, : 't' 

Sj53,llJO,.(HH. It.mil, ilcnwliii,! !. 

AniiniiiiEKiiu I'l-ocuromfnl I ; 

AKfiin-'y, Jolii-l, ]JI, 
-IliiytliLTJit I'a,, Ijfsfinfton.Mi!.',! 1 ' 

llmnl) fn/i'ft, Hrlnlol, Tcnn, Jr.:: 

I'niisiin'tnonl A ,Sii|i|ily Asm, .'-- 
--A. (). Hjullli Corj>., (JlilMfW. }!,!!. 

nmlEtimi IninirKi, Wiwo, T, ('-'- 

I'rdfinroiiR'nt A Suiiplx A(ftff,i'-: 

A in run (!i>rii., Wftukcshi, WL'. II-' 



, 

Ilnrvcy Aliiiiilniim, Inc., I(w. 
$a,H7ll,fU)0. I'c.iA'tillks.Ttfrrir.aK; 
Ai'Hi-nnl, I'hlltiilcl]il)in. 

(imcrnl Time <;or|i,, fft(lnl' r - 
Hiillc, III. Sli),llH;!,029. Fuiaf.li' 
nminiinitlmi, LnSnllc, AIMM^ ! .' 
ciii-onicnL & Snjiply AgciK?.' 1 ''- 

HiifflicH Alrorflll., Culver CiU, fc 
100,01)0. TOW/riollcoiitcr3. Wa 
Army MtatiHo (Joininiinii, Kftei 1 
IIuntHvIllo, Aln. 

Port! Molam, Denrborn, Midi'" 
Priidnctlon & liimieclkni ew^'-i 1 
loos on MlfilAl (rucks, Daite;-ij 
Miuiiiiror, (ioiu-rni PitriioseVt^- 
Mobility CiKiimniul, Wnrra, KA 

Eurelin WJIIInms Co., Blocwr-- 
$2,OIH,HB9. llomb fuzes. Btai!i;~ 
miinitlim I'mcurcmcnt i SJE-?" 
Jollct, 111. 

Hnyllionn Co., Lexington, Hisi.1'^ 
Hawk mlflHilca. Anilovw, Has^f; 
ailo CoininnrKl, Itodstonc Arai'i- 
vlllc, Aln. 

Bt'niUx Cftrp,, Bnltlmcrft M'^ 
DevGlo])incnt of n |io rla .. 
more, Kiljtcwood Arsenal, Mi ' 

DcLojift Cot|i., Now York, P';" 
TrcHtJea AUC! nuxlllnty MW M -; 
and lowing. Hong Kong. A |Cj 
Enulitmont Center, St. to 1 * t , 

Amcrlenii ]Io]at & 
Minn. *l.-lll.flao. 
flliovcls, St. Paul. Arm 
merit Ceiitcr, St. Louis, 
E. I. D up out Dcnemouta 



ton. Dul. *1,Z3_, 
Ammunition !>,,.;:;, TNT. Harhsilale, Win. 
Aiti'iiiiV, Joliet, Hi 1R U-ement & Supply 
- Kl'A, (iinmlen, j,V 

iviii'iirt'h ft dt'veji "'* 51,500,000. Classified 

it I, Miinden, ^'^^icnt electronic equip- 

iiiinut, l''t. Mi)ni-t 1 _.,*"Tniy Electronics Com- 
11,' 1 1 lU'llrnntcr f^2? th . N.J. 
Hlitl.llM. liJnde ti^~* Ft. Worth, Tex. $2,- 
nipti'i'ii. Km- 1 W-Q-VrV^blies for UFI-1 hell- 
liirii-l (Inmmiiiicl, Q ' " Army Aviation Mn- 
-L.ouis, Mo. 



aiihlnKton, D.C. $G,- 
equipnient for 
ip 



I |>rr.. Kk'i-li-n 

niH.fiHU. Clon ,. _. 

nu vii I pilupji. Me; r ' onH e( lipme 

;t'l)l ( 7lili. t)('veliini lo ^Ysh>nBton, D.C. Sl,- 
nnil niiilpmi-nt t I continj* prooessce 

nf tin- LM-lf.OO J"*Iirove the reliability 

niiii'iin- nut;. Kvari^V,? ll U,! nc er| Ki n c for 
Kyiilt-mn Cimnnaurl l - Ollio - Nilvnl Slli l> 

/i-iiltli HcuHn Oit-' 

i"* ChicaRO. S2,47R,923. 

^Oo vices for Sidewinder 
Air Systems Com- 



i.iiuiil, 



;,. Chlnriiio 



ll.iiiHlMH Alrcrnft, 

'inn nun TA JW,,tZ 

ni i.iii u, /\- j ] i 1 , n i * 
Air -'iV-.lrmn 



ic, Baltimore, Mel. 
ulnr sotH for the Air 
fnvnl Air Syslems 

each, Cftlif. 33,- 
LonR Beach. Nnvnl 



! "onto. Cnllf. 

N '" n I',,, ,V T?,^ <i *' c l)omb3 - E > Monte. 
Nnry OrilnuiRc I'lr,t, LoimvillG, Ky. 
) nrlliron ,.. Vnv tnnoulh, R.I. 512,345,500. 
';',"" '' ';j"l|''nt f*n- insinuation on naval 
(''iliimiS IH>1 ^Taval Ship Syutemii 

.jinrliniii {torti., AVltli 1T i, Maas. 15,511,042. 
(oiiiijiiiiilditloiiH Grin l T T11cnt for nnval flhips. 
Wiilllinm. Nnvnl BSUIra Sy&lams Command. 

I iiiirrwrll, Inc., S^ntfclc, WnBh. 51,070,175. 
I.'lntniiih l.n'mlnul eciuipmcnt for navnl 
nlill'M, ln'iLllUi. MJIV**! Ship Systems Com- 
iiiniiil. 

Ciilllnn Itndlo Oo,. KlcTinrdaon, Tex. $3,- 
nvii.fmil. tilt trrttiH ]><!. inljlo commimicntlon 
i-i-Mlnih f AN/rsa.iG). Cedar Rapids, 
IIIIVM, U,H. Marina Oovpa. 

'.', A I in ii I mini Cnmpnwi y of America, Pitts- 
iMinrh, I'd. s;i,37a.l*OO. Motor tubefl for 
ll.V'i liu'li ri('l(l.H . ISTow Kenalngton, Pn. 
Nuvnl iilitiui 1'nrtn Control Center, Mo- 
rlmnli'Mlnirjt, I'a. 

,'l Hniiilirimlorii Klcetrtc CTontrncting Co., and 
VoKii Kk'drk Co*, 'VlFslnia Bench, Vn. 
),:ili)i, Illll). <;iiii!it.i-itctioii of nn electrical 
'IliUi lliuHnii iiytilotti cit tlio Scwellu Point 
Aivn, Nnvnl Mutton, ISTorfollt, Vn, Atlnntie 
Div.. Nnvn] I'Violl it ic-a EnginecrinK Com- 
iiiuuil, 

NnilU Atnurlrnii A.vitlon, Columbus, Ohio. 
SI, 171!. DUO, (!(invet:nlon of A-5A weapons 
iiynirmsi In It A- ISO -corx figuration. Colum- 
Inin, Niii.nl All' 3yrttemm Command. 
lliitiltiT-Knmo Cnrp.* OnoRn Park, Cnlif. 

ili.UV.flliii. IHnitiil *ltn. computers. Canogn 
I'nrli. Nnviil Hlilit fSystoma Commnnd, 

(Ji-ri* r n| liinlrumimt. Corp., ITickavillc, N.Y. 

SUMi.tKlft. lleitlluflolicl survoillnnee rndni-H. 

lllckiivllli-, Naval SJiJr> Syntems Command. 
1 1'A. CiimihMi, NtT. SO r 4H,877. $1,682,001. 

flinniJIrd rrnmnniilcntions countcrmeuauro 

t'jiiiljiHicnt. (Jiimdeii. l>Tnval Ship Systems 

Ciiiiiiiiiiiid, 
It Trrhrilrnl Mntorinl Corp., Mtimaroneck, 

N.Y. !:i,.|.|tt,aiO. Itn<J* communicatioiiB 

"Vnl en in for unoi'o ol ectronica HyateniB. 

Miiiimnnu'oh, Navy TMirchnsing Onice, 

WiiiililiiKion, O.O. 
dfiirrnl Klcrlrlc, Seattle. Wash. $3,3C7,COO. 

Mln |.ni|iiilHln Tin *or supply ships. 

VVwtl-ynn, Mnw. I'Liteefc Sound Naval Ship- 



, 

k Co. Pnrltsl>uirsr, Pn. 88,300,206. 
,allm fr use in trnnsportinK bombs. 
mm. Nnvy i' a :Pftlta Control Cen- 



Corp.. AIH""*"*^ 11 Mfffl dfv " Los 
Anin.|. tt'mSAOO. ComprenHor power 
unlit mi.1 Vr iiTi-ljIrto compressor power 
mL 



MIIHH, 



' Mass, $2,030,008. 



vl]lc, N.Y. and Log Angeles. Navy Pur- 
chasing Qfllce. Waahinglo-j, D.C 

FfS^r*^ 11 *?*., Co " Sl! ttle, Wash. 
U ,057,68(1. Mam boilers for supply ships. 
Seattle. Puuct Sound Naval Shipyard, 
Bremerton. Wash. 




7 S|>crry RoncI Con)., Chai-lotteavillc, Vn, 

51,908,112. Stabilised muster compnHa & 14 
hin uncle con trol cnbi nets & associated 
power supply & bridge alarm indicator 
equipment. ClmrloUesvlllo. Nnvnl Ship 
bys terns Comrnnnd. 

Kollniorgen Cori).. Noi-thtimpton, Mass. 
31,885,608. Pei-Lftcopc systems, including 
adapters, repair pnrls & associated looh- 
nicnl dntn. Northampton. Navnl Ship 
EvHtems Comnmnd. 

PMC Corp., Snn Jose, CnEif, 51,250,704. 
Modcrniation iif LVTH6 vehicles (Inniling 
Vehicle Tracked Howitzer) to LVTHGAI 
confiffiiration. Snn JOHQ. Marine Corps 
Ilcndquai'lerB. 

fl United Aircraft Corn., pi-ntt & Whitney 
Aircraft Dlv., IS. Hartford, Conn, $4,000,- 
000. Phtise IT of development of the TF- 
aO-P-12 eiiEine. B. Hartford. Naval Air 
Systcrns Commnnd. 

Dendlx Corp., Baltimore, Md. $3,220,185. 
Airborne Hadio recciver-transmittei 1 sets 
and related equipment, Baltimore. Naval 
Ah- Systems Commnnd. 

United Aircraft Corp., Hamilton Standard 
Dlv., Windsor Loclis, Cnn. 0,874, C30. 
Aircraft propellers & related component!!. 
Windsor Lochs. Navnl Air SysteinH Corn- 
man d. 

Litton Systems, Inc., Woodland Hills, Calif. 
Sl h 2pO,KB3. Components for AN/ASQ-61 
bnllistlc nomputcr uystema Tor A-ftA air- 
craft. Nnvy Aviation Supply Onice, Phila- 15- 
r!el])hia. 

Conco Engineering Works. Inc., Mendotn, 
111. $1,115.423. Mark 77 fire bombs. Men- 
dotn. Nnvnl Ordnance Plant, Louisville, 16- 

Harvey Aluminum, Inc., Torranre, Cnllf. 
SC,GB4,44ri. Projcclilea for loniiiiiR 20mm 
ammuiiition. Torranue. Nfivy Ships Parts 
Control Center, MeclinnicsburK, Pa, 
Reneral Dyntuulcs Corp., RWtrlc Rout 
Illv. Grolon, Conn. 83,145,203. Clnaidfiecl 
rcaenrch and development ediilpment, 
Groton. Nnval Ship Systems Command. 
Collins Rnello Co., Cednr Hnpids, Iowa, 
$3,23-1,830. Commimicnlion, iinvieaUon & 
lijentincntlon ayaloma. Cedar Uapltls. Nnvnl 
Air SystcmH Coininand. 

LTV AcroFtpnce Corp., Dallas, Tex. ?1,S3B,- 
000. AcniilHltlon & instnllntton of milling 
mnchinca. Dnllna. Nnvnl Air Systems Coin- 
mniid. 

Washington Aluminum Co., Ilallimore, Md. 
E1.31-1,C78. Fnbi'ication of MA-2 pallet Sc 
mat naHeinblieti for uaa In SATS (Short 

Airfield for Tnctlenl Support) airfields. 
Ilnltimore. Nnvnl Air EiiKincoriiiK Center 
I'nilndclphln. 

Horn Warner Corp., Philadelphia. $1,- 17. 
611,315. High-speed paper tape rending & 
punohiiiB eyateniH with related dntn & 
repair pnrta. Philadelphia. Nnvnl Supply 
Systems Command. 

10 Turnbull Elevator Inc., Erie, Pn. $1, 100,043. 
Electromechanical elevators for AOE3 
supply ahlpji. Erie. Pa B et Sound Naval 
Shipyard, Ilremerton, Wash, 
Raytheon Co., LexliiBtou, Muss. 33,150,000. 
Airborne radar sola & minted equipment 
for the Air Force. Bristol, Tonn. & Etcilfocil, 
MHHU, Navnl Air Systerna Command. 
Lllcs Conatructlon Co., MontKomery. Aln. 
$1,168,200. Ilelmhllitntlon of DOQ & EM 
barracks at NALF Ellyaon Field, Penan- 
cola, P]n. Navnl Facilities Eneineorinjr 
Commnnd. 

13 Collins Radio Co., Cedar Rapids, town. 
53,789,277. Communications equipment for 
installation on naval ships. Cedav Rnpicla. 
Naval Ship Systems Command. 
Riea Construction C*., Snn Diego, Cnllf. 
51,136,442. Constmction & rehnbilltaUon of 
EM Jinrriicka at Ihe Navnl Auxiliary Air 
Station, Ilenm Field, Imperial Beach, Calif. 
Nnval Facilities Engineering Command. 
Edward It. Murden Corp., Allston, Maaa. 
$2,100,000. Conatructlon of an aircraft 
maintenance hanger nt the Navnl All- Sta- 
tion, South Weymouth, Mass. Navti] Fa- 
cilities Engineer Command. _ 
Computer Measurements Co., San Fer- 
nando, Calif. $2,385,185. Electrical equip- 
ment (AN/USM-207). San Fernando. 
Navy Purchasing Office, Waahinuton, D.C. 20- 
Hughes Aircraft, Culver City, Calif, $8,- 



Industry 



3fi2,100. Adtlltionn] FY 6G fundinff for 
the Phoenix minaile system. Culver City. 
Nnval Ait- Systems Commune). 
-Sanders Asm>cinteH, Inc., Nn&hua, N. IT, 
SI, 800, 000. ReHOfii'oh & (lovelojKnent on 
olocli-oni* equipment. Naahiia. Navnl Air 
Sj'stenift Command. 

-Grummnn Aircraft Enfrinccrinfi- Corp., 
Bethimpre, L.I., N,Y. $1.0,028,000. FY 66 
procurement of A-liA & EA-fiH nii-ct-afl, 
Dethpnire Naval Ail' Systems Cummnnrl. 
Sperry Rnml Corp., Great Neck, L. I., N.Y. 
S17,8yi,BSO. Fiibriflation & test, of proto- 
typ models of the Phase II intcBi-ntcd 
Hunt nttnclt Avionics System iILAAS). 
Great Neck. Nnval: Air Systems Commnnd. 
Hercules Inc., Cumberland, Md. SI, 147,900. 
lie search & development w<irh on nro- 
peltantB. Cunihei-lntid. Naval Ordnance 
SyateniH Commnini, 

Grumman Aircraft Engine crimp; Corp., 
Itathpairc, I-..I-, N.Y. Sfi.OOO.COO. K-2A air- 
craft. llethjHipe. Nnval Air Systems Com- 
muncl. 

WcstliieJiouNe Electric, IJaltimore, Mil. SJ,- 
835,1 25. AN/ A I'd- fj<J radar wots. Itnlti- 
mre. Nnvnl Air Sy at urns Command, 
---(.oiieral Electric, WaahinBliin, D.C, SC.3SI,- 
257. MK 112 Moclnio Test Seta. PiHaiicId, 
MjLa. Spec in i Pi-ojont Office. 
nicDaiinell Aircrntl Corn., St. Louis. 
(1> S140,60*,000. To increase IUIIK lend 
linie effort for FY Ofi prdcuruniPnt of 
K-lli, F-4J, F-4D and HK-4C aircrnft for 
the Navy nml Air Forte; (2} S!i,r>00,000. 
1-ioriir lead time effort to siijiporL prmcure- 
moiit of P'-ID mobile (rtiininjf units & 
technical PuhHeii lions. St. Louin. Nnvnl 
Ait- SyBtuniH Cununnnd. 

-.Sperry Uniul Corp., Great Neck, I,. I., N.Y. 
SI, 180,000. RcHonrch & clevuhjpniciit work 
on the TALOS missile. Grout Neck. Njivnl 
OrdnancL' Systems Command. 
Frequency Engineering Lnbnratorlcn, 
FHi-minKdale, N.J. 31,017,250. Glassined 
cle-ctronicu equipment. Fafniintsilnlc. Niivct] 
Ship Sytitema Comniiind. 

IJnateE Co,, Inc., Morn, Minn, 51,48(i,(}00. 
5G-fot mcelinnisseil landlnfi ernft (LCM (1). 
Mora. Nitvnl Ship Syatema Commanil. 
Miami Hcndi Ymrht Corp., Miami, Pin. 
$2,207.620. 3<Ufiiot pluslk hindiiiu craft 
(LCPL), Mlnini, Nnval S3iii> Sjrutoma Coin- 
in niul, 

Mnrlncttc Mnrhic Corp., Marlnoltc 1 , Wiw. 
(1) 2.31)1,000. .Kon r Inrtre hnrlji.r UIRS 
(YTIt). (2) ?&,fi40.600. 2H aKiini.nim mcch- 
iiniKud inndinir *rafl (I,CM). Miirinutte. 
Nnvnl Shij) Hy sterna Oorntniind. 
(ienernl DynnniicH Corp., lilcctrlc Boat 
Div., Grotdn, Cotm. $3,a(i!),nil7, Two deep 
research vehicles. Gvoton. Nnvnl Ship SyH.- 
loniB Commanil. 

-IneallH ShlphiiildEni; Com.. 1'nHcauomln, 
Kllm. Sa7.a7.].47fl. An amphibloun immuilt 
Hlilp <Lrtr). FaBcnKonlri. Nnvnl Ship 
Systems Command, 

-General Klcctrlc, WnshliiRUm, D.C. i?l,- 
OO&.BOO. tJaH jrenerntor & pnwor lin'hlncs 
for Instnllatifin on navnl allies. Evonclnle, 
Ohio. Nflva] Ship Systems Cnmmand. 
--John C. OrlmbcTK Co., Ilonhvlllo, Md, 
83.194,000. Construction of an Inert diluent 
production plant fncility nt the Navnl 
Propellnnt Plant, Indlnn Head, Md. Chesa- 
peake Div., Ntival Fnoillliea Engineer in* 
Commnnd. 

-Electronic CommunicatlonHj Inc., St 
Petei-aliiu-B, Fin. $1,4115,000. Itndlo sclH 
and related erminment and acrvlcoii. St. 
Pete rs burtr. Naval ShE]i Systems Command. 
-Itecvoa litstrtmicnt Co., Garden City, N.Y. 
3:2,612,880. Vehicle Kyro cumpnaa Byatems 
for instnllntion on nnval aurfnce hipB. 
Garden City, Naval Ship Systems Cum- 
mnn-d. 

-Sumlstrnnd Corp,, Rock ford. III. $1,345,248. 
Uonatant speed drives for A-7A aircraft. 
SPfJ**? 1 / 1 ', Nllvy Aviation Supply OHlcc, 
PniJiulclphin. 

-General Electric. Evetulnlo. Ohio. 81- 
122.0!14 Spnre parts for J70GE10 enirlnca. 
iyenclnlc. Navy Aviation Supply Office, 
Phllndelphin, 

"?A,*\, ^o" 11 " 1 " 1 ^at ions. Inc., Kocheater. 
N.Y. 31,685,028. Electronic copier K roupa 
for nnval ships. Hoc heater. Nnval Ship 
Systems Command. 

"T J S?^ InBlr " mcnt ' Inc " Dallas, Tex. $2,- 
408,080. APQ-llfi rndai- system compo- 
nents for A-7A aircraft. Dnlltis. Navy 
Aviation Supply Qfflcc, Phlladcliiliia. 
'K,"i itci1 Aircr f t, Stratford, Conn, if 2,4 68,- 
000. Engine components for Initial oiit- 
nttlnu of GH-63A nivcrnft. Stratford. 
Navy Aviation Siipply Omce, Phllndelphln. 

'i C ^ ntrols C P- Fnirneld, N.J. 
ii. bpare parts to support central 

27 



air diita compuk'r systems for A-GA, EA- 
t*A & K 2A nirernft. Fairlield. Navy Avia- 
tion Supply Office, Philadelphia. 
- Mirkuk Electrical Instrunient Co,, Cleve- 
Itm.l, Ohio. S2.3iM,:iS. Oscilloscopes. Green- 
w I- A'isn. Naval Ship Systems Com- 
mand. 

- Collins Kndio Co.. Dallas, Texas. S2.0UQ,- 
Uh>0. liudio communications & data terminal 
etiiiiimiL'iit. L'tiiar liapids, Iowa 135',; |, 
IlK'hard.-ion, Tex. (fio'.f ). Naval Ship Sya- 
tt-'/n^ Lonuimnd. 

1 Hcivlott-Pnckard, Hockville, Md. 81,015,341 
Power measuring sots, power meters & 
related oiii|iment. Palo Alto, Calif. 
Naval Eihiji Systems Command, 
-hprrry^ Hand f Corp., I.oni- Island, N.V. 
sljsa,. r i!(0. World-wide repair, mainten- 
ance, alteration & installation of the TAR- 
I Alt 1 r.IUUKIt missile system for 1'T 
(N. Lotik- Island. Navy Purchasing Office, 

Unaka Corn., Greenville, Tenn. S2, 1138,039 
(Mark h2. Mod li bomb fins for r>OI) Ih 
!>mbs. (.retnville. Navy Ships Part Con- 
(-enter, Mechanics bun,', Pa 




. 

uses. Porn II! Ships 

I ai-is Control Center, MeclianicsliurK. PH 
(ft? ^?? I V" !a , 1 C - Cll '<fcn. N.J. 86 5: 

" vr'i''" 1 " 1 "': 1 ,, milt e;( t'-iu for 

Madis 




2-1 Cjrecnlmt Construction Co., Inc. Pensacola, 
Fla. Sl,2'i9,!l5K. Construction of an air- 
oraft maintenance hanper at the Naval Air 
Auxiliary Station, Whiting Field, Milton 
Fla. Southeast Div., Naval Facilities En- 
Kineerini; Command. 

International Builders of Florida, Inc 
Coral Gables, Fla. 53,084,000. Construction 
of a bachelor officers diiarters and mesa at 
the Naval Air Auxiliary Station, Saufley 
Held, Pcnsacula, Fla. Southeast Div., 
Naval facilities Entiineerinj? Command. 
Uysnn & Co., Pensacola, Fla. S2,.')7'J,000 
Construction of a bachelor officers quar- 
ters A: mess at the Naval Air Auxiliary 
Station. Whitlnpf Field. Milton, Fla. Naval 
^acuities EnKinoorinir Command. 
(.corjje Hyman Construction Co., Washing- 
ton, D.C p.072.000. Construction of a 
science building at the Naval Academy 
Annapolis, Md. Chesapeake Div., Naval 
facilities Engineering Command. 
Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.. New York 
Uity. S3,2.|5,09G. Minesweeiiinir cable 

l I ",'' nKfl :? n - HlIllB ? n ' N ' Y - Naval Ship 
hystems Command. 

1 ~Jj C R<i'r rnilf" T' Sona Co " ^ icllm<)|| d, Calif. 
ni / i' M" h . xl ,'il lsi ' 1 " lo "'""'iinition piers 
riif U7 . ^' n|l< i" s Station, Concord, 
Lalif. Western Div., Naval Facilities Eniri- 
mx'i-niH Command. 

.,lf ti Glnpl f'rt lir ur 

B '^^^M^Z^^P^^ 

bhi|, Systems Command. 



*}>M.\W. AM-a aluminum mat extru Canidnn Mi I?P" related ^uipnient. 

Hi"ns. Lafayette, Ind. Naval Air Rn^ . "' Nllv "' All> Systems Command 

nwnnir Center, Philadelphia B ~~m ,?5 nt " ffl Cffl " Cedar l{ "" i{lH lown Sll 





47^&^^? 



wBJI Inc., Hopkins, Minn. $2,055,- 

- 



rw". Cer A e d n' Systems, Man- 
chester. Conn. S1.020.KOO. Panichiite V 
conlnmcr a Sse mhlie 3 for Mark 24 flare 

blaUl "' NflVal ^"""" 



^i n c^ C r,S;;;; lli Sr^ l & p;i ' ;!< 

HoE" l M r n $ E ?'ne wlnff 'Corp.. 
lie npane, L.I., New York. 83,000000 

mr^'A^VSon^S-'^Vr'- 
-G3-N A n( r |oS l0ma C '"" 11 '' 1 " 1 



Kas"t .r- ast ' Ilu '. tfol 'd, Conn, gl,- 

fi , Pfi y rnircol^^ 

Hfll A ^ apace Cur P.. Akron, Ohio 

landin.r i " C "', lot l'l'e aircraft carrier 
janoinn device (2-H-R71 Air ' . ', 



onics Corp., Macon, fla Si - 

IftS^^wK-SS'lc 

^-._.asJWL-s* 

1. L, bySteitlK Inp Al/,vr.v..l^I ^r 

, }'" A| cxandria, Va. $2,- 



iB of 18 
llatlM ove 
e, Vn" hSn b 



" *"***'**** 




28 



Beecl 



Tm-ranc 
Command 



Ail ' 



Aircraft C rp., Wichita, Kan. S l - 



Dd^t M^menance-Cene^D 1111 ! 31 
istnt Kin, Coi-niis Cliristi, Tex. Naval F V ^ 




. 
S^'-S |^ oZ-'="L P 

^d.^00,000. Additiona fun ( lm B for Eni 
M.i nti S/ <111 l . hc Navy. Silver S,,S 
x , l7r < !l ' " n(l Cano K a Park Mat;] 
Naval Air System* Conin.and ' C ' 
ni.I.l., (,aml.ridp;o. Mass. S3, .150 845 Cora. 

Vv"X7tSnc^ 



... 

C n^ M 01 ^ 1 '^, 1 " H "'"il'ment, Fall, 
Ch,,rch. Naval Ship Systems Commaml. 

4nnnnft rd r In V: erilU y i Pnl(1 Alto ' Cnlif - *^ 
rinn, Con . tini ">tin of fundamental nu- 
dear researoh. Thm contract, which .bo 
F^n "i , " t ; L ' |1 t ' llni1 of Stanford's High 
.Wmr?J C8 I ,'" ll< 5 nllor - v th "wrh ". 
Pm,H, "i - hci< llc vclo|nont of the ma - 

c oi ductinic Inicnr accelerator and the ]HH- 

Mn Li Ti?"?n- ll<H1 f ilH ITlnolPlM to th 
Maik II! billion volt accelerator. Palo Alto. 
OHico i>f Naval Hesearch, Washinsltin, 

~fn P n'/B y .)?. IIIl 1 Cnrp " Gpoat N h - L -'- N ' Y - 
*n,U(iK,,j71. Increased funds for fabrication ,, 

and lesl of prototype models of Phase 11 ji 
(..teat Neck. Naval Air Systems Command. ' 
Q." , C r A '" prift ' Sikorslty Aircraft Div,, 
b tint fn], Conn. ,?] 3,800,000. SII-3D heli- 
coirtcrs nnd related equipment. Stratford 
Naval Air Systems Command. 

~' Jn I Aircraft, Pratt & Whitney Div,, 
io as V; Hllr( - f 1. Conn. g2(i,2im,093. TF- 
ti ,* pnB'nca for the Air Force. Ens! 
Hartford. Naval Ail- Systems Command. : 
, l) !'"' Anicl 'lcn" Aviation, Inc., Columliiis, 
Ohio. 88,025.000. Contract Dctinition 
Phase T I of the CONDOR Missile system. 
Co umbiia. Naval Air Systems Comnmni . 

Lolumhus Milpnr & Mnniifacturing Co., 
inc., Cdlumbua, Ohio. sa.afiC.OfiO. Arming 
wire aaMemblios for bombs. Columbus, Ohio. 
Nnvy Ships Parts Control Center, Median- 
icsbin'E, Pa. 



AIR FORCE 

"Jlfet Sio K Icr ' Inc - Grand Hnpids, Mich. 
D,5(i9,ll9. Production of navigatfoa and 
bombmtt computer sets for F-4 nirersft- 
"''"'"I Kapicls. Aeronautical Systems Div. 
(AFSC), WriRht-Pnttcvaon AFD, Oliio. 

-Collins Radio Co., Rielmrdson, Tex. S3,- 
030,000. Engineering, production and in- 
Btnllation of high frequency, Binnle-siM- 
bnnd communications facilities. Btcharil- 

July 1966 



lion. KiHit'i' 1-iyiiH' Dlv. |AI'';'(!|. l,n:i 

> (ii'iiri'iil Miitiiri,, liiillnmviHillii, Iml, ^l,:!1li,. 

{''in','!' I'llllll NmuliiT :!<;, Ariinmiil Irnl 

Hyiil.'iiiH Div. (Ar'.'iCl, UVliHil - 1'itl I i-n ' 

AI-'H, nliln. 
:i I'liltn-i'liui. (.'i-riiii'Mluiiiiii-ii X. (Iil.-r. Inr., 

(ii.l.'lii, CiLlif, SI.IHH.IIHI, t'r iri'in.-iil 

mill hnhilliilhui nf nn liinli-inni'iil nl Inn 

uyiih'iN, llnli-lii. Air l''i,i'i',- !>| Jnl \VYn|i 

HUM r,-nl,-i' |A1''S<<I, hlrll I Al-'ll, N.M. 

Miiv.'i'in I'lli-i'iniiil.'" I'lit'ii,. lii i-ni H U'i'i', 

N,V. ivUVd.UII. I'l'iiilll.'ll f fn-.-i- t ,,,. 

jii'liilillrn fur limiilri, MiiriHi, I ",n. t }|>il,.:n 

Air Mi 'I.'! A.i-it lAM.ri. 111)1 iM^l, 

Illnll. 

I 'I'll, l|l-Vl'lll|TIII'll(, !, L "I lit 111 l-lll'llll'l-H III! 

fur iNiiili-riil/iilli'ii ,,f whim I llii'i.Hi-li V 

nf tin' MINUTKMAN W.-HI Mvr,<,- M i 

fifiilll.-. lliillLMi' ;:>"l.-i.m Ilk (Al-'JiCi, 
N..rt.-M Al-'ll, (liillf. 
-IVnlli'i 1 Klililt- Cnn-ili n, [urn. In,-,, N,, W 

iilrurlli."! nf 'tin' nlHli-li'l I ih.Minl ,,',,, , 

flll'llllir:! Ill M.M.Ill \'lr1 lllillK Nl'VMll I. ,\ I > 

i; liin iniijili" Cni'ii., l'u. >ll. rn, ^i,i,[.i,,i:ri-.!, 
I'n'lliiihiiiiy wni'K mi Ni) ii h' ili-f'-iini. nv-ifi-i.t. 
I'liiill. Kli'i'D-iintr . l ;v:i|c.ntL Niv, i AI-SC i, 

l,,i; MltltKi'Ml.l I'l.-l.l. ,Mn-r, 

Ti-Mifi Inr.ii n IIII-MI, i, hi, 1 ,. I in Mi in, Tr\ , :',', 

li'CI.I'MM, li'trrlfiiiil-" n|.ii|>tiifii1 f.-r HI'' IT 
n In 1 I'll (I, Diilltri, A.-i i.niiiil In, I :l\ (ilnnn 
Iliv, (AI'SC). \V)'liflil.|'i,n.'i..i.i, Al'll, nlii.. 
li.-i.i'iiil lluinmli'N l'.'.|i,, Nun hii'i'H, I'siltf 

IllllHI'll 'if 11 1 >ll. -I- I r'll'UI .'ll I in I, nln ; In 1 1 

111,')!". Illllll'ill,- iivnlr.nu Illv. I AI-'M'l 
Nl.l'tnll Al'll. t'ullf. 

' Ihilliiril Cii., Hi lili;i>|ii>) i, l '..tin., ^l,li'i."',iniu, 
1'nulni'llni! nf niiii-lilii>- i.ml", II) lili:, 'i-ii, l , 

Ai-ri'Mtiillli'liI livnli'inn Iliv. I A IM ' I. 

Wrii:lit->'i!lii-in.>n AIM, Ulil... 
Allt.-i.riir.-li Mfii, I 1 ..,, T.i! MM , 1'itltr, SI, 

iM:i,:iiiii, I'li'ilin-iiuii nf >'iiui|,iii>-i- i-Miiii". 

Itl'lll'i fill' I'' 1 lillrillfl l.ii-i Al,|'.-)r-i, Odin, 
li.Hiiti Cliv Air Mi.l.-ilrl AI-.-II lAI l,l'|. 
TliiLi-i' AMI, CiilK, 

Ni>it1itn|i I'lirn., Aiihlu'lin, riiHf, ^b,iinii.iiiNi, 

Tl-.'llllll-tll MHvlfn III ,1 mU nf III,' TIM' 

(li'iil liili-lllir.'ii,',- I'm i', '.iiilnir !iv--a.-in Aim 
lii'lfit. Ai-Mtiiiiuitnil .'ivh-m-i IHv, lAlill'i, 
Wriiilll-t'nlli-ini.li AMI, (lliln. 

H.I'.A,, M 'i,i,,>Mi, M J, xl, 1 i;,.in,!i. 'J,-!.., 

l-'..irr I'lii'.t.-in T.-:,| |(,,,,|,,- ( AMII'l, !'(- 
fid, Al'll, Mi,)!.).., 

l''.riF:lnr,'i'li)l! ,l,^,'li,[iiin-iil f,n Innn^v.'.l 

Mlllllli' II llll'inlll i, :i|-!ll!lr (Tll1ll.il ll- 

:i\.' l h in', IHv, lAl'i'il'l, Mtiii-in AI'JI, i'niif 
Hl.t'ii 1 ) Hnii.l Ciirii,, rli,, i| ( , MI .,vll|,'. Vti, 
Sli.VM.T/r,, I'm. Im (!HH ..( I'MHii'int.-iiin f.,i 
iilrli,,rm, itiOiu i AN ,\I'N ",.\'\t i f . ,i '' Ml 

Syjili'liir, HU, f Al ,'il'i, W)li;li!-rm(. !!,. i, 

AMI, llhln, 

Mylvni.ln l-;lr<'ltli' I'millli'ln, [hi,, VVulMinlH, 

i'lilldim i<<|iij|i>ii,-iii f,,, Mlt;HTE-;MAN Win* 
I, lliiir,iln, N,V, A. Witliln.,,, ll,,lli',il,i 

HvM.'lil., |Jlv. lAI'.'il't. Ni.>li,ll ,\] |l. 1',,11-f 

H't.jim.f r.ii.ii",i..-i.r, fm M,,. TITAN III 

IHv., lAI-'MH^ 'l,u, Am/.ltV '"" 

I'lnV In.-,, Id-il^mli, |i..t-lt. i:lil, SI.IUM 

till", WlU'l, ,, ,.,.,.,- , ( h>1 rum,,,,!,,!,'!.. 

" ll-'-lctnli. li.'ii.'li. An I',,,, i- :ii,i. Jlii. 

'' "1 f-'itrHllv lAI'.'H't, I,,,, A i, (!1 -),., r 

Niirllir.in Cunt.. !liiiv|ln,nir, I'ullj, si, inf., - 

",'"-. , s !""" l" 1 ' 1 '" f> it i"' i-inti-jti.'iti .f...' 

llir ! I, tilri-rnfl, Hnih,,i -. Mini An!iilo 
,Alr Min.-rirl ( \, ( . n nUTI'i K.-llv AI'H. 

'I'l'lnlvne hitliintrltjs, Inr,. iViu.i i Cojtf 

Jl.M:!.HH.|, Hr^llH'lt K, .l.A.'U.l.t.li'ftl P.-IV-, 

''"' I" "MiU'iiM ,if ,, n,| Bltl | ( . ,!, |i.|..,rni..M. 
t'ii"!i'l.-iiii, Afnuuitiilinl N>'.I.-I.I-. IHi- 
. I ...!' ; , H '. 1 ' Wilutil.|'nfl.-)ftp.N A I'll, tllil... 
Inlf'kt.l I'liniilrnl r.irn.. llrlclinui I'liv. 
"Hi". *l,li;!li,;!-1M. 'Hirtim viri.u- l,,.| 

','"';! ';"v. Air l-' (J iv,. |' ( ||,;|,i TV'V'iViilM- 
' A1 '"'l, lvlivnr.li AMI, t: a \\f, 

TITAN III n| , n !-,, 1 'ivr. 'ltt-\^ f 'r.'"i{\.u^ 

.M'HI.-ni,|_IHv. (AK'iCl, l.i.r, AiiKrlf). 

I'nilnntli.M ' *.,f MINlVi f-'.Mb N' '' mUlkV, 
liit..|iiTi AMI M.. 



,,.. ; .-iit-nnii,. ,,( | MJ | '|-].;|.;NI 
(iLin'.i, "null. Sju-i ......... i,, Aip- MiiK-i'li-l 

r\r.-,. iAI--|,i:i, MK-Mi,,,, AKH. Ci.llf 
Ml% " ..... "''I A In-run Ciiiii., Si I i.ul,, 

si.ii-ui.jH.i. M ..... M,- ......... (l 'h" ,,;,,. ' ;; i r 11 - 

1 



lii Ai, , 

HIM A I 1 II. Uliili 

'.!! HlnrJi Krm-iiri-li C,it\t., IliilViiln. N.Y si - 
JI ' f V'"- , M-"tl*l.-..H ..... ,Un. j.i.nr.1 ^u-h, ft 
"iiiiliii'.-i-lpi ( r !lf .|. vl,.i"i fur I! i:n uiivriin 
I'-tintl... ^Vnnifi- K.,I,||,,, Ate MII(,.I-|..| Ar.-.I 
l' l,l.> h llnlilu,, Al'lt, Ki-nnrlii 



liind Air I'riivinir Cirinintl (N-ntDi- (AI-'SCl, 
I'lisliii Al'-|l, Mu. 

t:nrliH-\Vrlrt]H (,'nrii., Wmul Hhln-, N.,l. 
l,;;iri,.|nh. E'luilm-liim nf i-ninkulmrtu nitil 
' n 'Hi|ii ....... Id fur llh> It ]:>( ..... ,-!,. t ,f u|,-. 

i-mfl I'Miclni'M. VV ..... I Kiili-r. Him Aiitonln 

/\lr Alulri-li'l A mil I Al-'],i;), Ki'lly AKI1. 

T<-.\. 

Fnlr rhl M Illllitr (Ttirp,. I'urmJMiiilnli-, N.V. 

M,fH:!,:Mn. ]'!iiKiitri'i'liur ni-i'vli-.-ii tin- lln< 

...... Hll'-iil lii nf I In- wiring n.vnlfm nn I 1 ' llffi 

inivnifl. KuriMhiicJiilc. Hm-rjiini-ulfi Air 
Mjiti-i'ii-1 Ai-i-u lAI'-I.O). nh-Clcllitii Al'H. 



'llilijli.,1 Mirnili'iil Ci.t'ii,., Itrlclium CHy, ;!H lii-norul Molum, 1iiiliiiiiii|nillii Iml ->(\ . 
..',:...., .:;" M !'"' ."' <1| ; U "". ir.n-ln.-k ,,.,II,I r,W.ym. 'l'..r.ii Hln-niH .'nifliu-.., HIM) i-.-lntn'.l 



riiitp.nlJilin,.,! |]| ( .,i,-l Mli-c-ji'l,- (',., SiiMnri.nl 
I "H. *r,liM,4:!7. I',-,, ..... .(I,,,, nf fllr ..... i-v- 

i;-liit! iin.1.1 IMII-LM it,, nun ,,,,1) ..... , ..nnju-jivl 

,-ii.iMf.ir. Wunn-i-liMhlnH Alt- Miu.-rli-! 
At. i. lAJMl! U,,!,!,,,, Al-'ll, (in 

' 



i. |i,.,|,,,, K | in .,lii,-li, ..... f 
" l " h " ,!! u ''''" " ll ' '' ..... lll] i^'li.i'i. lliilH- 
"."",'; ''['-'foiul,' fiy, ..... niv (AI-'NC), ],. 
( -- Huii'.r ..... l''!.-1,l. .Mn,,:,. 
THW. hi. 1 ,, .Ui'.Umln ll,.|,,'li, Cnlir, SI r.itn- 
imi. \\,.il, M., ,,| N1 ,.,. i-rnrn,,,,, n,.,!,,,,,!,, 

ll.-li.'ll. J.fnr,' SvolrtMK HU- (Al'JSCt |:<>.| 

A "iv.'li"., 

(.'.n.-nil M..I.I.',,, lu.lli,,,,,,,,, 



"""I"'* All I'M-vllIK lil'lltlllil^ ('Mllli-v 

Kitlln Al'll. f'l,,,|i1it. 

A.-n..i,,ni,- fni'iL, |-;| fi,.,.,,,,,!,,, rulif, j,',- - 

UIII.1UII, SL-tLUliU,', ,.]n;lll.vi ililr. IM,,| t.vll- 

'J' 1 '" 1 ""*" f ....... 1>|"'M ,.f M'n''-- A l.nl- 

ir-lir |.M. fc! it.i.r Ml !irn ..... I,,, ;i|.i.,-,- SVJ.NI ..... 

I'll 1 , i Al ;;ri. l.,,, AI.H.-I.',, 

li.-llrt.il l^lr.lfl,^ rin.-int.utl. llhin, |1) 
"'".'. I- H'.VHI, PuMliH'ti.'H ,,f .1 V!l III .<iii'i<t.-:i, 

'""I ''' *:iii;',r.V)i.;'!,:i. I'l.Mln.-il ..... ,r ,i v;i 
Hi riiiHiii-T, t'im-i ..... ill, A.'i ..... Hifirtil ,'lvn. 
'NII, hlv, iAl''Mi: f Wilrln.l'uttrrjit.n Ar'll, 
Ulilc 

Thi' Mllltni'v Al.llfl <*niinMlili,l, Jl.-nll Al-'ll, 
III IIIIN tllMUilr.l Mix r.,lli,^||ll! IMIlh'lll-l'i 

(,.i- ...-I vl. . i IJLII i,,,. ]. y i-it;v ; 

All llf I fiili-iiiiitliiiiiil, ) in-,. M in 111 1 l-'lti 

M I'l.'i'l.t.iHitt. 

Alftnltii Allllrira, III,,, .'Ii-ntllr. VVii^.li. SIl - 

ll'l.l.llllll, 

Htnulir litlc-riiiiliiiniil, lihllnu. -|',-,, $;{. 

Kl.li.OIIII. 

I ,.|.llnt Atmii.n, Inc.. N'H^tii-tMr, T.-ini, 

'f, in ;. ti mi, 

rt'itlhu-iitjil Alt l.liir*. hii-,, I.,.-, Ani' ( .) t "i 

Tnlir. SSLIH.IJ.tPjIDIP. 

i'hliiu TltiiT l.dir. In,'., Iiinh.-Hit,. I'nltr, 

',- II. ,"11, ..... ). 

N..i(liuri Alilliir* Inr. S1. I'unL Ml ..... 

i!.it*,'i';.t,iiNii, 

t(\rwr)i* Sntiiiiiinl Alrimvn, lin-.. \Vinli. 

llllllnjl. III". ;) l.ll.'ill.lKPK, 

1'nii Anu-ilxiti \Vnrlil Alrio, hn-, Nrw 

V"i Ii. N.V, 9l,'i,:i;.!..(iiiu, 

Hnliirn Alrumn, Inc.. Mlriml. |-'|n. Sl:t.- 
i!i I. nini. 

Mi'nliimiil Wnrlil Alilin.-i. IDC., .1 ..... H |i-ii. 
K.V , if .;.!.',i;ii,inni 

N.iiitlirm All- Ttniihinnl, |c,, Wtnlilnj!- 

iii>, li:t '. 'A ,',: .i^i.iiiiii, 

Trillin I'ttrllitic-nii Altn>n. Inc., N>-\v 

Vi'ili, N.V, sv.'HJ.ium, 

'Iriina Iitlrrnnltimnl Alrllnci, hu.. I.ii>t 

Vi \mvt, N'l-^', Sn/inijHKi. 

Wnrld Alrtsntn. hu .. Mulilninl. fiiUr, 



111 r,' ' 

I'iv. lAMCi. Nt.rlmt AKIt. rHf, 

" d ''"'" '"'" I " lNtl<l 



i , .. 

1?'." 1 Uh Bl !"" m ( '" v Alr 
rm (AI-'I.C), Tiiihrr AMI. dfetn, 



A If 'rriH|tnrl. I HI-,, Inlmn.r, 
Mli'ti. .SIH. |i',i;, MIH 
TrfliiH World Altllncn. New VnrK i'ily. 

a.'t.M i.iiini. 

'l lltuiilldm VVHlrh di,, l.iiiii-nirr, Tu. SI,- 
(n.H.nliii, Thm-Ki f.,f Hii'iUT t<t>ml> iuliMil''r. 
l.ru|i'iir,!.-r. Air I'mvlni! liruiitnl I'.-mi-r 
lAI'.'iin, KwHri Al'll. I-'|H, 
t'nlllun l'l|ie di., hi r., iirnl Mnrwnh Hlffl 
C.i., Itirl. ..... i*. I, Cnllf, 81.71!'.<l!il, J'rmlnr- 

I !< n i'f nn-Fnl i'<-vi<liii.'iii hliM fur ulri-rnfl. 
l(ii-lii ..... nl. vi'jr.ttih Air llji'E.- WltiH iAI'1,1!). 

W.hstiM'HHrt^ifi Al-ll. ItliiM, 

'>' AVfll turn., T.Vnil.uth.i'i.rl, ].n. S\,\-l'JM'.i. 
ft-l-niMii-ni nf tttHiilnrlliiii <'j||Kil>llll>' fur 1 
rtitii|.fiiiriiM ..f till 4iiA lirlli'i.|ilci'J', Wit- 
lltttii"! i,rl A^riiiiiiiilicnl .Syiid-iitn [)lv. 
iA]-?ir ( Wfltilii-l h iii--i-^,ii A Kit. Uhln. 

l, Inc., ll-n-Mm. Minn, Sli.Vlin,- 
Mi"lliin i-t nircrnd unliiuiii'i'. Hni>- 



Vli" 1 " 1 ";..,!;! 11 " 1 : 11 '' 1 *" 1 l^'^li'.nili' Hyulftini 
I ly. (AI'HCl. r,. ({. Hu .......... , |.-|,.l,i. A | llhlll . 

< nllhiH Ftui|li> r ( p., Ci'ilur |{n|^<lii, Imvu, $>,. 
lild.lPHd, ri-mlil.-lllill ..f , ............. | f 'I,|i,,i),i 

I'Hliih'iiK'iil. iri-ihu- Kiii.ltH Oliliilniiiin (lily 

A r Mnl.-i'li.l Ar.-i. (Al''l,i;i, TlnhiT Al''li, 

(Jlihi 

Hrini Ai-rniiiintlciil Cn., Mini |l|,.jrn llnllf 

J-iJi. I ii!i. :!;(,, iiHf n int( -r iEr, ..... ;b nm | i','|,|,.,i 

i'i|iii|imt'iil. Snr> IHri-fii, Ai-r ..... Mitlrul HYH- 

Hlv, (AI'Ht!). l\'rlHl)t-l'iiii,.nH.ri Al'll, 



. 1l . >ii-n 

Syi. I-IIIK Illv. (AKSIJl. W|-tKlit.J'iHr..rrLiin 
A ! It, (lh:ln. 

fJiyu'Nil Kli-HHi-, Wi'jn Lynn. MIIMM. SH,- 
tilji.Nim ll.-^.-lnin.ii'ur pi-uin-iun fur 1' IM 
1.! .-iiiHn.'.'i f,.|. h.-lii-nj,!,,,.,,. uv.il T.vmi, 



.. ',T, 

I..I-, N,\. Sli.. Kin, 'JH5, |-'n/,. .,, ..... ,1,11,.,, ri,|' 
itlivrnf! luir,il, ;l , i; IVM l Hk'i-i'. n^ili-ii All- 
M I ..... "l-l A >'.., HIM A KM. Uli.li. 
..H Sliinli'y AvIriUini Cir|i.. Mi-nvcr lluli) it'l - 
II '(,!-,! Kihi I,, nmillfy Niu-.v HIM! AlV 
l-i, n-i- A t iiiri-nif! wild nli'iu'ri-w i--;(i'in'liii- 
i-ii.-iil.i' tiyi.li-m-i, U|., lv ,-i-. :liii'i'n m( .,, t(( Atr 
Miili^ili.l Ai-.'ii lArt.rj. M,-CI,.||iiti Al'll. 
I (i Mr. 

llflK r.... j|,.,,iil,.. w.iiili. li-..,l,ni iui.1 .1,., 

v.-lnimu'in ,,r ..M.-riinl hutnln fur HI ..... r- 

"'lid 1 iilivrufl, S;! ( |PH'.:,V(>"I. liirfiitlvi' run- 
rui-l fur iii.nll ..... ,U ...... f || B ;! nlirn.fl 

Mi:fn v.mr,,] n.voi,-,,!,., Mnml,.. Al.- Cmvlnir 
(.i., imil I'.-iii,-,-. Mulj,, Al-'ll. Hn. 
l.fi.-klii',-,! niinriltrn unit S|iit,<,, (',,,, K, mm - 

vi". fiiUr a-i,<iM;,nini. i ......... i, ,,,,^1,.,,, 

n,r Illv Aio-nii I'III-|H.| fi- ..... AiiHI lilllll l,, 

'T i ' ,i., . :> . ...... vvli '' 1 '' Ji T" tP '' H.vult'inM IHv 

vl.ili.ii (Ar.'Hli. I.,,-, AHI(.-|,-H. 

"" 111 '"" v '" 



""Hii"-: r.ii i.r,iHi.. 

l11 "'- " f 'lvi'..v,| 
i,y,it..| BI M Vnn Nnvn 



I'r/i'.T ','v ni " ' |iniv<i ''"" '*iv. Mii-h. si,., 

-LIT. H.il. (,iiri)i>i',-M;i t ,,- |,t,,,it'it mi. I n-lul.-il 

'.';''; ^i"" 11 ' r> " ..... i";; 1 ; ...... iTi.iiiiiiiiiin win, i 

tiitni.|,i. Inm-nic (Illy. Arn.hl.l Knirlii.-t.r- 
ln;i ll.-vi>li.|.ui^i| Ci-iii..!-, Ai-milil AK'i, 

AV'ro (W|.., WHiniinsh.il, MHP.M. J:!,K'ir,.l',Iilj 
lli'.'.^n iL-vi-l.-in,!.-!.!, fiihrli'i.ll.ii,, t.-i,l tunl 
.vlwnil.i ,, !]. Mliinli-Miiin Miirh MA 
v-fiih-y v-lilHr,.. U'kli.ilniU.Hi, Hnlll^Uni 
jOiil.-in.i Illvlnl ..... AI-'.'UM, :N..i'li.ii AI-'H. 

-'HI la-m-nil Klrrlrlf, Wt-il. Lynn, MIKIJI. 81! ,- 

.ifi-Ut/ll, AtiTI'llfl rnnliH.;, fi'l- III.' T ItH lllt.l 

; r. uln-mCi w,. :(l |, VI1I |. A.'i-i.ri.ii.Hi'nt 



'inn AMI, Oliln, 

I < nllvil Alrt-rnf I, Kum | Jm-tfm-.l, ( ! ...... , 

l.!lU1i ( UHft Htuiro |.nrlH r.tr th. ,1 57 itlr- 
i-riirn .'iiKlii.-. I'innl lliirtr.ini. ^utt Aiilmnln 
Air Miiti-ri,.| AI-I-II lAI-'I.^), Urlly AE-'II 

ll'X, 

Mllrni lnilimlHi'h, Int., Hun CiirloH. (!Hf 
5hl!Ufl,tlCI(l. It.vi.-ai-i-li ft ili>vi>l>i|>irii<riL uf 
Hvclruiik- iiin|,|lll<-r ty|i! luln-M. Him Uiirttrfi 
Sytiit'tiiN KimiitfrrliiK (Jnniiv Wrhflil- 
I'ntt.-niini Al-'tl, (Ililii, i wm 

lirA, Mniir.-nti.wii, N.J. s-i.nnn,)iiiii, ITU. 

ilurlli.D nf nrniii.il rn.liii- f(|iil|iiitrii(> 
MiHircli>ivn, Aii- I'-i.i'iT Wcni.-i-ri 'IViit 
Itiinm', Vnnil.'iihcru AI-'M, Cnllf. 



, 

IlHwlliin-ii.., A.'ri.niintEi'iil Myhtt'tn-i Jllvl- 
"ijin. (A!- 'Hi; I, Wi'lKhl-I'iUh-rmni Al-'ll 
Ohio. 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 
WASHINGTON. D. C. 2O3O1 



POSTAGE AND KEGS 



OFFICIAL BUSINESS 



CARNEGIEJ.IBRARY 
AUG201966 




Army, Air Force Test New Surfacing 
for Temporary Airfields and Heliports 

While "instant airstrips" remain in the pipe dream stage, tem- 
porary tactical airfields and heliports may soon go on short-order 
lists of the Army and Air Force. A newly developed neoprene- 
coated surfacing; membrane is expected to turn the trick. The ma- 
terial has been subjected to extensive field trials in the United 
States by the two Services and is being tested in Vietnam under 
combat conditions, 

The Army Test and Evaluation Command (TECOM) has com- 
pleted integrated engineering/service tests of the T-17 Airfield 
Surface Membrane. The tests were conducted at Fort Campbell, 
Ky,, with TECOM's Armor-Engineer Board serving as the execu- 
tive agency for the overall project. Engineering tests were con- 
ducted by the Army General Equipment Test Activity, Fort Lee 
Va., another TECOM element, with the support of laboratories and 
technicians of the Army's Engineer Waterways Experiment Sta- 
tion, Vicksburg, Miss. 

Aviation units were provided for the tests by the Army Avia- 
tion Test Board, a TECOM command located at Fort Rucker, Ala 
and the USAF Tactical Air Command. The latter executed landings 
and take-offs with C-13Q cargo aircraft while the board flew mis- 
sions involving CV-2 and OV-1 aircraft. 

The experimental material is intended for use in constructing 
stable dustproof and waterproof surfaces for temporary airfields 
The accordion-folded panels, packaged in wood crates, are 
dispensed directly from cargo trucks. Alined and straightened 
by hand, each of the 7SxlOO-foot panels is anchored to the ground 
with giant steel "tacks." Joints are constructed by overlapping 
adjoining edges and securing them in place with tack anchors and 
liquid adhesive to form waterproof seams. Side edges are fastened 
in v-trenches dug at the sides and ends of the emplaced surface. 
The ditches are then backfilled and compacted to form smooth 
shoulders. Surface repairs are made by positioning a piece of mem- 
brane under a damaged area and cementing it in place with 
adhesive. 

A heavier surfacing, called the WX18 membrane, is being tested 
on the touchdown areas at each end of the Fort Campbell runway 
to determine if tears resulting from aircraft landings can be elimi- 
nated. If the WX18 material proves satisfactory, an airfield con- 
structed with a combination of the two membranes should require 
virtually no maintenance. 



Dollars Sovod 
Thru Reduction In 
Top Secret Document* 



k 



tln< 



The DcfoiiHO lU>|>ai1im'n( 
reduced its Top SIMMVI H^n'i 
inventory by IV I prnviif. tM 
realizing- n cost avoiMarhv ^ 
of an estimated $1 iM.mm iim 
the 12-month pcriml l^-iinl 
April I960. Tim IY,|IH(LII i 
lessened tho ri 
compromise of 
mation, Thin in 
accomplished pri 
destruction (!l.| 
also through 
classification and Ir.m*fi'r : 
Federal Records CtMidMj. 

During- tlio poriinl .l:nu;j 
15-March 15, lilHr;. \\w Milisi 
Departments and tiller 0.11 c| 
nents of DO]) pai'tiri|>.iM 
the project for ivdurinn imu 
tories of Top Hftttrrt (Ti-ctJin-;* 
This 60-day prujivt iv.u j 
proved by the Dnpnty H>>iif| 
of Defense Iiastnl itiinit ^j-ti 
ence gained Ity tin* Oilt^ofj 
Secretary of DoftMi^ 1 . hi :i \ 
day test endinjv in N'-ti^ 
1965, OSD achitivi't 
reduction of Top 
ings, thereby ylohUnj,' nn 
mated annual cost 
over $5,000. ; 

Participants reported ^ 
this project causml ;ill nt\i\ : ft 
to take a more delitwral^if.^ 
est in keeping Top Swref ^ 
ments to a minimum opwiy,j 
with current requirement* 



.S. Governmant Prlnllni 



Volume 2 No 8 




ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF 
DEFENSE-PUBLIC AFFAIRS 



August 1966 



IN THIS ISSUE 

KximndhiK Horizons ThrouKli Ily-Mail ItinlrnHion : Tin- Now 

Look of our (NnTi'HiimioYiico School i 

Annual (Nmt KtMluclloii Itciiiirl KlitnvH $.!.!> Hillion SiivinirH in" 

i''v linn; 4 

8 
II 



1'iu'ldiKO ProiMirKinnnL Cimrenl. 

Tin- Air Forn' MH|IT Tout linage: (Jovt'Tiiint'iit.I'rlv(< In- 
dnslry 'IVnmtvorlt in rrartlce 

DEPARTMENTS 

IMi'i'tiiiKN and Myni|iiiHin 
Aliinil I'cdli- 



UitHlfiitn 



Cali'ntlni- nf 
HihHiif;rn|jliy 
1'Yom I hi- S 



M 



(i 

7 

10 

10 



The Industrial College of the Armed Forces 




The Imltmtrinl Colli'fri' of till 1 Armed l-'orci'H, tu lukllliim to |iro|iarluf HtMtJor 
military itlllriTN tuid (toviTiinuMK. ufllrlnlH for liiwli iiulicy-innklnu iniHitioiiH 
in I hi' field of imlinnnl m-curily, IIIIH nvrr l\\v yenrn cmnlucd'il exti'iiHioti in-o- 
KrnriiH to nliirnto mlliinry n-Hi-rviHtH tuul eiviliint oxwulivi-H lacaU'd Uirouwli- 
otil tlif nation nncl flu> world. 

In Hie article lu'KiiiniiiK on \M\KC 1, Mnjor (ivncnil Williitm H. Hlwlo, tlHAK 
(Hot.) tlcKcrHn-H the oxluiiHion ediicntlnnAl ncliviticH cunduclt'il by the 



The Navy has initiated an engineered, long-range study to mod- 
ernize all Naval shipyards with the exception of New York and 
Portsmouth. The New York yard was closed on June 30 and Ports- 
mouth will be closed in 1975. A team of associated specialist com- 
panies, headed by Kaiser Engineers of Oakland, Calif., has been 
awarded a contract by the Naval Ship Systems Command to de- 
velop the study. 

The Long Beach and Philadelphia Naval Shipyards have been 
named the two pilot yards involved in Phase I of the study, which 
includes assessment, analysis and recommendations to modernize 
all equipment and facilities. 

Phase II will involve a similar study and recommendations for 
Charleston, Boston, Norfolk, Pearl Harbor, Puget Sound and San 
Francisco Bay Naval Shipyards. 

Phase I is scheduled for completion in a 24-week period; an esti- 
mated 64 weeks will be required to complete the survey and submit 
the recommendations for all eight yards. 




Ginn Jr., as Deputy Director. Commander W. B. Brantner is Tech- 
nical Contracts Manager and Mr. H. R. Pyles is Technical Director. 
Specialist companies associated with Kaiser Engineers on the 
project are: H. B. Maynard and Co., Pittsburgh, Pa.; The Ray- 
theon Co., Burlington, Mass.; Gibbs and Cox, Inc., New York, 
N. Y.; Morris Guralnick Associates, Inc., San Francisco, Calif.; 
and National Steel and Shipbuilding- Co., San Diego, Calif. 



USAERDL Surveys Manufacturers 
of Physical Security Equipment 

The management and support functions pertaining to the pro- 
a-ramming, budgeting and funding for all research, development, 
test and evaluation (RDT&E) of physical security equipment has 
been assigned to the Department of the Army by the Defense De- 
partment. Within the Army this responsibility has been redelegated 
to the Commanding Officer, U. S. Army Engineer Research and 
Development Laboratories (USAERDL), Fort Belvoir, Va. 

^ij' 1 ? 1 P ^ f ^ l )r ram is the establishment and mainte- 
nance of an information analysis center for the collection, storage, 

on nhv -vl dlss T lmt10 ? 1 of tech l data and/or information 

^^RDT ^ Srf Tr^ T T accom P^n this task, the 

MiDL Scientific and Technical Information Division is con- 

\g an extensive survey of intrusion alarm and personnel iden- 

'.on systems m order to obtain all pertinent technical infor- 

'vTh?^ t^^syBtema Data and/or information 

vill be indexed and entered into a data bank to be made 

"" "ntial military users of physical security equip- 

to over 200 manufacturers of physical 
Manufacturers who did not receive a 

request a quekionnah^m; ******* in this P**ram can 

Technical Info ation Division 




Published by the Department 
of Defense 

Hon. Robert S. McNnmnrn 

Secretary of Defense 
Hon. Cyrus R. Vance 

Deputy Secretary of Defense 
Hon. Arthur Sylvester 

Assistant Secretary of Defense 

(Public Affairs) 
Eugene J. Slecvi, Acting 

Director for Community Relations 
Col. Edwin C. Gibson, USA 

Chief, Business & Labor Division 



Editor LCdr. E. W. Bradford, USN 

Assoc. Editor Miss Cecilia Pollok 

Assoc. Editor Mr. Rick La Pake 

Editorial Assistant 

Norman E. Worra, J01, USN 



Fort Belvoir, Va. 



The Dcftinim Industry Bulletin 
is published monthly by the Business 
& Labor Division, Directorate for 
Community Relations, Ofi'ico of the 
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Pub- 
lic Affairs). Use of funds for printing 
this publication was approved by the 
Director of tho Bureau of the Budget, 

The purpose of the Bulletin is 
to serve as it moans of communication 
"between the Department of Defense 
(DOD) and its authorised agencies 
and defense contractors and other 
business interests. It will serve as 
a guide to industry concerning offi- 
cial policies, programs and projects, 
and will seek to stimulate thought by 
members of tho defense-industry team 
in solving the problems that may arise 
in fulfilling the requirements of tbe 

Material in the liullctin is se- 
lected to , supply pertinent unclassified 
data of interest to tho business com- 
munity. Suggestions from industry 
representatives for topics to bo cov- 
ered in future issues should be for- 
warded to the Business & Labor 
Division. 

The Bulletin is distributed without 
charge each month to representatives 
of industry and to agencies of the De- 
partment of Defense, Army, Navy and 
Air Force, Requests for copies should 
be addressed to the Business & Labor 
Division, OASD(PA), Room 2E813, 
he Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 
20301, telephone, OXford 5-2709. 

Contents of the magazine may be 
reprinted freely without requesting 
permission. Mention of the source wilt 
be appreciated. 



"3 

MaJ. (Jen. William S. Sleele, USAF, (Rvt.) 



thin nuclear ai','0, more than ever 
o, our Inlut reiioiireo.'i uii'l all nf 
economic, uncial mid (Irnvrn- 
ill iaiitil.ullon.'i have ben ..... i h . 
:'ahly tied In mir (|uo,'il, fur mi- 
I liccurify, The meniborM of nil 
[ of oil i- nreat nalion (iovern. 

induiilry, labor, ediicnliim, (In- 
miiimn, Hie iiiillhiry and the pnh 
. lat'nv -tinmt lie well [nrnrint'il 
irliculato in I lie c.oiti|>le\l|jfM i.f 
ml iiecurily nlCiilm il' Ihoy are lu 
Lhmr necesiiary parhi ell'erl ively 
re.u'iiardhiK our way nf |jf ( .. 

ladUiUrial Cnlle,.,. (if (In- Armed 
, III addition to preparinc, lienim- 
ry olllceni and ilnvernment of- 
for hifi'h policy. malcinjt pn:ij| ji.mi 
s Held ill' national fiemrily, hau 
tho yearn cnmluclrd eKloiiMlon 
UIIH In educate inlllttiry re 
In and civilian rxrt'tillvni Inntli'il 
;lnnil tlu nuliiiii mid ih^ \\nrlif. 
l ri'Kiml, llic Iiidualriid Cnl 

(IiH'ri'iijKiiidiiaci' (Iniiriit; li;t!i 
i In lt niunt, nirirtlvi'. Mnni Ilian 



'It'll thin Ht'iiiluitlK li'vitl rnunii', 
it ctii'.tllini'iil, inunluTu almiil. 



'ii alniii', hitwt'vt-i', d ..... ( iv. 
viiliii* i.f Mi,. nmn;r. Mitiiy 
"ilhrr itnw nn-uiiy or will 
up (, ( | (( -y iiiKiiliniitt lii mi, 

irlty alFaim willifn tin- 
find ubnmil. 

DumumlN of I 



M fa.v f.r 
in W nrlil (luil Imii 
prKri'HHlvt'ly lurlinlnnl itfnn* 
1 or World War II. Thin tnr- 



ami ticUm! inililiiry 
It" induciit'c in iill-iti'i-vnnlvi'. 
iwitflH many of AninrlniV lii' 
Rffulru and nlin<mt nil nf our 
1 nffftlrn. On Utn ildincHtit! Hide, 
Imlunco nuitlcm tht- jmwrvn- 
n HLronjf HIM! vijil.lt. mtnitinic 
fttwolutnly mnnilttlnry if Utn 
Stalitu j t<t niuhitnlu mid im- 

industry Bulletin 



luinr(1 it" I'oi.illoa a;; leader of the 
l''ree World. 

Itolali.ms wilh Western Kurope and 
die emerniiiK nalinnn of (| u > wt> r\t\ are 
ail'eeh'd, So aiv tarifl' and trade ([ ue;i- 
'"""';_ loreij-'ii economic, niililary ami 
('clinical aid; projvraimi of cultural 
e\clmiiive ami Information disnemina- 
lion; and our participalion in the 
United NaMmiii and other interim- 
lional etl'iirln hinlcintv Inward UK, re- 
duet ii HI of world lenitloiut, 

In the face of rapid technological 
|irKrenn by potential enemies, the 
Unilcd Stalen hint had tn c.ive increati- 
iniV iitlenlioii tn (he development nf 
new weapons, In jicieiitllie research 
and to upare lcchnolo|;y, Tin- |ire!i!iure 
of armeil ci.iilliet in Vietnam Imx cnin- 
pelled Ihe United Slale ;l lu build tip 
lU'vilih- miliiary fixn-ti and cmnmit 
inereaiiinj. ntimheri! of the;ie forcen to 
Ihe balllelleld. 

Thi-iip devc-lopaieatu involve policieti 
Hint acli.Mi iirnKrama which lay heavy 
claini!i nn America 1 ;! resoiirceH, which 
uiv vuiit liut Unite, The central dial- 
lea);.' l-i how to recnncile conliiciinK 
demandii and lienl allocate availulilo 




MnJ. d>n. William K. Stcclc, IIHAF, 
(lift.), former Deputy Coinmnndimi 
of HIP IndtiHtrinl CoIk'Ke of (ho Armed 
I'tircfM, JH now HcrvlnK AH n conmiltnnl 
and menilwr of the Hoard of Atlvmorn 
fur the IndiiHtrfnl ColleKe. (ion. Sleclf 
n-tlrccl from the Air Force July HI 
after M yrnr* of active wervicc. 



in mippiirt of iauni'diaU and 

i! national (iiiciiriLy pro- 
IVi'iiaui. 

The niaiuiKcnient of Injvbil.ic re- 
Hources has hcconK! a tviRmilir hiiiti- 
ni'nn, (IciiiniiilfiiK din iiK-n-aiicd uiti* of 
distal computer:! and lh 
of the hJKheiil, levehi nf 
linowledfve on a rapidly 
fv Imwlii, The ln-nadeniii|.v u'f 
thin knowledive auioniv our potential 
hin'h-lcvel decinion niaknrn (liroujvh 
advanced ('duration in Dun-nMi. man- 
!iK*']iien(, hau liennine a primary cnn- 
eera of our toji national MecurHy 
Iilannei'.'i. 

('upHlone of DcfoiiHi' MnniiKcniont 
Dducalioa. 

M. in Ihe purpiDie nf the lndu;t|,riiil 
(Vilh'lVe of Ihe Armed l-'urwn to fm-un 
on the erilical iiiiiueti and perni'ilenl; 
|H'nhli'iii!i in thitt Held. I'Ymn Hit ineep. 
linn in I (KM, (lie ImhiiiLrln] (!nllc K 
hau had a diiitini'tive I'ducational role 
in resource laaiiajvenient. Opera tinjv 
uadcr Ihe direclien of the Joint Chlefti 
of Stall', the colletfe iilandM today nu 
"the capstone of .mr mililary eiluca- 
lional iiyiitein in Ihe manau'einent of 
lojilallr ri'iioiim'n for national HI'- 
cui'il.y." Itii pre.'iciil, cliarler specifi- 
cally direclii the collene to "conduct 
coui-iieii of niudy in (he economic ami 
indnuLrial asipi'i'tnof national necurity 
and in Ihe nianatternent of n-Houn-cii 
under all eomUlimw, Kivhijv due con- 
.'dderalion to Ihe iatorn-laled military, 
political and uncial factor;! all'eclinjf 
national nccurily, anil in the context 
of luilh nalintial and world all'ami in 
order to enhance tlm pre)iaralion of 
m-lceletl military olllc.era and key 
civilian perMiumel for Jinporlant com- 
niund, Nliifl 1 aad ptilicy-inaldiiff poHi- 
tloiiH in the nalioniil and intonui-< 
tinnal wrurity utructure," 

At KorL Lesley J. MeNalr, Wiwli- 
iiiKtoa, D.O.hnme lmne of du* In- 
diiHtrial (!olle(jro -thi! IteHident Cout-Ki; 
providew the Uwlliiff fvround for In- 
noviiUotiH In (MluruLlonnl inethoditloKy 
and for now concopU in Dofeawo man- 



This 10-month course the core of 
the* College's three-part program is 
now offered each year to 180 carefully 
selected senior military officers and 
Government officials. At the close of 
the 1965-66 academic year, 2,925 offi- 
cers and civilians, representing alt 
major areas of functional, command 
and technical responsibility in the 
Military Services and civilian agen- 
cies, had completed this course since 
1946, when the name of the college 
was changed from the Army Indus- 
trial College to its present designa- 
tion as the Industrial College of the 
Armed Forces, 

These resident students share a 
rare experience. Shedding their vari- 
ous service uniforms and preconcep- 
tions, they study together in small- 
group learning situations and ex- 
change ideas and experiences in an 
atmosphere of complete academic 
freedom. The program is fast moving 
and intensive. Recognized leaders 
from all sectors of the economy and 
the Government appear before these 
students on the auditorium platform 
and in seminars. Giving generously of 
their time and talent, these visiting 
speakers and panelists point up what 
has succeeded, faltered, or failed in 
the past and recommend what, in 
their judgment, is needed for the na- 
tion's well-being and defense in the 
present world setting. 

Two extension-type educational ac- 
tivities are conducted for those who 
cannot attend in residence. The first 
of these is the National Security 
Seminar program, in which officers 
from the military components of the 
college faculty conduct a series of 
two-week seminars each year in se- 
lected cities throughout the nation, 
Bringing together selected senior re- 
serve officers and representatives of 
the local business and the academic 
and civic community, these seminars 
have contributed much to supplement- 
ing the conferees' backgrounds and 
their understanding of the crucial 
issues relating to our national se- 
curity. As of June 30, 19G6, a total 
of 279 seminars had been completed 
in 157 cities with a total enrollment 
of more than 166,000 military and ci- 
vilian conferees, 

Fundamental Improvements in 
Correspondence Course, 

It is my purpose here to focus at- 
tention on the far-reaching and funda- 
mental improvements the college is 
currently making in the third ele- 



ment of its three-part programthe 
world-wide Correspondence Course, 
which, until last December, was en- 
titled "The Economics of National 
Security." In that month a new name 
"National Security Management" 
was adopted to more clearly reflect 
the course content and purpose. The 
current program of intensive curricu- 
lum and textbook revision places 
greater stress on Defense manage- 
ment and on an examination of the 
policy-making and administrative 
mechanisms, programs, policies and 
managerial tools employed in harness- 
ing the Nation's resources for national 
security. 

Established in 1950, the Corre- 
spondence Course has evolved as an 
off-post replica of the Resident Course. 
Using its own specially-tailored text- 
books and tested methods of instruc- 
tion, the Correspondence School ex- 
tends the essence of the resident 
program to active and reserve officers, 
Federal Government employees, busi- 
ness executives and selected foreign 
students. The director of the school is 
Captain Gordon F. Smale, USN, a 
former member of the Resident School 
faculty. 

Hero, indeed, is an extraordinary 
opportunity for qualified officers and 
civilians, in and out of Government, 
to gain a deeper appreciation of the 



central problems in the managcmen 
of logistic resources and of the eco 
nomic and industrial aspects of na 
tional security. The Correspondeno 
Course curriculum is presented in 2 
small bound volumes, presently orga 
nized into five progressive and inter 
related units of study. 

A "Foundations" unit (Unit 1) hi 
eludes an introductory survey of th 
entire course, highlights of basic ect 
nomics, a broad exposition of the mai 
instruments of the Federal Govern 
ment and of the processes involved i 
the formulation of our national st 
curity objectives and policies, and ft 
basic concepts and practices of mot 
era-day management both in the Goi 
eminent and in the business an 
industrial world. 

Unit II, "The Resources Base fo 
National Security," comprises fh 
texts which analyze the managers 
and substantive problems in harncsi 
ing our resources human, materia 
energy, industrial, transportation, uti 
ity, and scientific and technological- 
f or the nation's well-being and secu. 
ity. 

Unit III, "Defense Logistics Mm 
agement," presents, in four volumi 
and in depth, trie central problems i 
requirements, procurement and pv 
duction, and supply managemei 




Dr. Harry B. Yoshpe, Chief, Textbook Development Group, The Industr 
College of the Armed Forces. 

August 19 



throughout the Defense Establish- 
ment. 

The theme of Unit IV, "Foreign 
Aspects of National Security," is pre- 
sented in five volumes which take the 
student through the international 
arena, the intelligence community, 
U.S. foreign economic policy, mutual 
security and the ideological struggle 
for men's minds. 

The concluding unit, "Plans and 
Programs for National Readiness," 
(Unit V) includes four volumes which 
highlight the administration of the 
economy in World War II, the meth- 
ods, past practices and current plan- 
ning of emergency economic stabili- 
zation measures; the nature and 
scope of the problems anticipated in 
the event of a nuclear attack on the 
home front and the preparedness 
measures that are being taken to deal 
with these problems; and, finally, the 
Communist aims and inroads among 
the emerging nations and the U.S. 
response to this challenge through its 
military and technical assistance and 
related civic action, community de- 
velopment and public safety pro- 
grams, 

TextbooksThe Life-I)lood of 
Correspondence Study. 

Always a basic medium of instruc- 
tion, textbooks occupy a particularly 
important place in the college's Cor- 
respondence Course. While the Resi- 
dent Course permits many study tech- 
niques auditorium presentations, 
seminars, group discussions, simu- 
lation exercises and varied reading 
assignments, the correspondence stu- 
dent is largely confined to his 
textbooks. The effectiveness of the 
coui'se depends entirely upon the 
quality of the texts. The imper- 
sonal nature of the instruction and 
the high caliber of the enrollecs de- 
mand the best presentation possible 
of the facts and thinking in the na- 
tional security management field. It 
is essential that there be at all times 
a comprehensive, perceptive and 
well-balanced set of textbooks, prop- 
erly keyed to the special needs of 
correspondence instruction. The cen- 
tral problem is to insure that this 
important body of educational litera- 
ture is kept abreast of the rapidly 
changing national security picture, is 
m complete harmony with the scope 
and emphasis of the Resident Course, 
and ig pedagogically sound. 

From the inception of the corre- 



spondence program, it has been the 
policy of the college to place primary 
reliance on "in-house" development of 
textbooks. A small Textbook Develop- 
ment Group in the Correspondence 
School servos as the focal point for 
leadership, guidaiice and direction to 
the program ; provides direct, concen- 
trated and professional application to 
the task; and insures the synchroniza- 
tion of the correspondence curriculum 
with tbe Resident Course. This group 
is headed by Dr. Harry B. Yoshpe, 
Professor of National Security Af- 
fairs, a member of the Industrial Col- 
lege faculty since 1961. 

In carrying out its responsibilities, 
the group draws vital support from 
the Resident School and other com- 
ponents of the college faculty. Out- 
side specialists are brought in for 
consultations and for reviews of 
drafts or published texts. Where prac- 
ticable or necessary, other Govern- 
ment-agency officials and outside 
scholars contribute directly to the de- 
velopment of texts. Authorization is 
also obtained to reprint appropriate 
published materials. 

Through those efforts, there has 
emerged a body of educational litera- 
ture popularly referred to as "blue- 
books" that is distinctly the prod- 
uct of the Industrial College. Through 
these texts the college carries out its 
policy of basing correspondence in- 
struction on tbe Resident Course. 

The textbook writers take advan- 
tage of the unique know-how and re- 
sources within the college. A basic 
program exists for promoting the pro- 
fessional standing of the faculty and 
better equipping them for their essen- 
tial contributions to the college pro- 
gram. The college, in turn, gains from 
the prestige and higher professional 
attainments of its faculty. 

In its approach to the job, the Text- 
book Development Group maintains 
exacting standards. It seeks not dry, 
ponderous, encyclopaedic narrations 
of detail, but vibrant and interpre- 
tative syntheses which are informa- 
tive and at the same time good 
reading 1 . The texts must be penetrat- 
ing, provocative and scholarly, but 
not pedantic or ornate. They must be 
accurate, concise and analytical. 
Along with commitment to objectivity 
and adequate coverage of all im- 
portant subject matter, care is taken 
to insure freedom from excessive 
redundancy within any particular text 
and to achieve maximum unity, bal- 



ance and cohesiveness of the entire 
aeries. 

Like the civilian faculty in tbe Resi- 
dent School, the professional members 
of the Textbook Development Group 
hold professorial rank. Their formal 
resident teaching and other cross- 
college commitments are deliberately 
kept light, however, to allow them 
ample time for their basic research 
and writing tasks. 

The texts are In use in hundreds 
of libraries throughout the United 
States and in 51 friendly foreign coun- 
tries, including foreign war colleges.. 
Of the 22 course volumes, 20 have been 
translated into five languages; Span- 
ish, Portuguese, French, German and 
Chinese. One volume is. being trans- 
lated into Japanese. Five nations 
Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru and 
Venezuela have incorporated the ma- 
jor portions of the course into their 
military educational systems. 

Tackling Obsolescence. 

In its efforts to meet the needs of 
correspondence instruction, the Text- 
book Development Group has faced up 
to the one chronic problem obso- 
lescence. The Correspondence School 
curriculum is reviewed and revised 
each year on the basis of a thron- 
ynar planning 1 cycle. With the volumes 
now in the system and under develop- 
ment, the problem of obsolescence 
should be loss formidable than was 
the case previously, Uiit events and 
the lead-time in textbook development, 
revision and publication will inevi- 
tably create a lag; in the program. 

To help offset this problem, the Cor- 
respondence School publishes and dis- 
seminates to Us students an annual 
National Security Management Re- 
vieiv. Initiated in the early summer 
of 19GB, this "yearbook" highlig-hts 
for the student the latest trends, 
events and problems in major aspects 
of the course. It brings together a 
wealth of near-curront information in 
tight space, in sharp focus and in 
forceful style for ease of understand- 
ing and ready use. At the same time, 
the materials in these annual re- 
views, tailored and keyed to the texts 
in the National Security Manage- 
ment series, prove invaluable In lip- 
dating particular texts as they are 
taken up in the scheduled revision 
and development cycle. 

Over and beyond the annual re- 
views and the normal cyclical revision 

(Continued on Page 21} 



Defense Industry Bulletin 




MEETINGS AND SYMPOSIA 



SEPTEMBER 

U.S. National Committee for Pure 
and Applied Biophysics in connection 
with tlie Second International Bio- 
physics Congress, Sept. 5-9, in Vienna, 
Austria, Sponsor: Office of Naval Re- 
search, Contact: Mrs. P. H. Tennis- 
wood, (Code 444), Office of Naval Re- 
search, Washington, D.C. 20360. 
(Area Code 202) OXford fl-1638. 

Symposium on Galio-Marinidc, Sept. 
2C-27, in Wales and England. Spon- 
sor: Research and Technology Div., 
AFSC. Contact: R. W. Runnells 
(AVN), Air Force Avionics Labora- 
tory, Research and Technology Div., 
AFSC, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 
45433. (Area Code 513) 263-7111, ext. 
5-3802. 

Sixth Annual National Conference 
on Environmental Effects on Aircraft 
and Propulsion Systems, Sept. 26-28, 
at Princeton, N. J. Sponsor: Naval 
Air Turbine Test Station. Contact: 
Dennis A, Wysocki, Conference Vice 
Chairman, Naval Air Turbine Test 
Station, P.O. Box 1716, 1440 Parkway 
Ave., Trenton, N. J. 08607. (Area 
Code 609) 882-1414, ext. 365. 

Sixth Symposium on Naval Hydro- 
dynamics, Maneuverability, Waves 
and Physics of Fluids, Sept. 29-30, 
Oct. 3-4, at Washington, D. C. Spon- 
sor: Office of Naval Research. Con- 
tact: Mrs. S. W. Doroff, Office of 
Naval Research (Code 438) Washing- 
ton, D. C. 20360. (Area Code 202) 
OXford 6-1433. 



OCTOBER 

Tenth Annual Organic Chemistry 
Conference, Oct. 4-5, at Natick, Mass. 
Co-sponsors: Army Natick Laborator- 
ies and the NAS-NRC Advisory 
Board on Military Personnel and Sup- 
plies. Contact: Louis Long Jr., Head, 
Organic Chemistry Laboratory, Army 
Natick Laboratories, Natick, Mass. 
(Area Code 617) 653-1000, ext. 414. 

Colloquium on the Photographic In- 
teraction Between Radiation and Mat- 
ter, Oct. 26-27, at Washington, D. C. 

Co-sponsors: Air Force Office of Sci- 
entific Research and the Society of 
Photographic Scientists and Engi- 
neers. Contact: Dr. Amog G. Homey 
(SRC), Air Force Office of Scientific 
Research, Washington, D. C. 20333. 
(Area Code 202) OXford 6-8705. 

NOVEMBER 

Ship Control System Symposia, 
Nov. 15-17, at Annapolis, Md. Spon- 
sor: USN Marine Engineering Lab- 
oratoi-y. Contact: Walter J. Blumberg, 
Steering Committee Chairman, USN 
Marine Engineering Laboratory, An- 
napolis, Md. (Area Code 301) 268- 
7711, ext 8670. 

Fifth Annual Symposium on 
Physics of Failure in Electronics, Nov. 
16-18, at Columbus, Ohio. Co-spon- 



AFA Annual Meeting 
To Include Industry Briefing Program 



Some 39 companies will conduct 
special briefings on 54 different aero- 
space and defense subjects at the Air 
Force Association 1966 Fall Meeting 
to be held at the Sheraton Park Hotel 
in Washington, D.C., Sept. 14-16. The 
briefings will cover advanced aircraft, 
pi-opulsion technology, space tools, 
escape systems, communications, 
guidance systems, composite mate- 
rials, V/STOL and many other sub- 
jects. 

This is the third year that the 
Association has staged this type of 
program, which combines short and 
informative company presentations 
with, displays of hardware. Three ma- 
jor features make up the AFA brief- 
ing program. First, a summary of 
each company's proposed presentation 
is reviewed by a special Military/ 
Government technical advisory com- 
mittee to determine the quality and 



educational value of the presentation. 
Second, the audience is assembled into 
small parties and escorted to each of 
the presentations on a specific sched- 
ule. Third, those participating in the 
morning briefings attend an Associa- 
tion luncheon and those participating 
in the afternoon briefings are invited 
to attend an Association reception. 

Each company session is allocated 
exactly 20 minutes of which 15 is for 
the presentation, three for questions 
and answers, and two for the party 
to move to its next briefing location. 

Invitations are issued to represen- 
tatives from more than 40 Govern- 
ment departments, agencies, offices 
and installations. Bus transportation 
to and from the hotel is arranged to 
accommodate attendants. Between 
2,500 and 3,000 persons have taken 
part in the program each year. 



sors: Battelle Memorial Institute and 
the Rome Air Development Center 
Contact: Joseph Schramp (EMERP)' 
Rome Air Development Center Grif' 
fiss APE, N. Y. 13442. 

Third Congress on Information Sys- 
tems Science and Technology, Nov 
21-22, at Buck Hills Falls, Pa, Spon- 
sors: Electronic Systems Div., (AP 
SC) and MITRE Corp. Contact: Col 
C. A. Laustrup (ESRC), Project offi- 
cer, Electronic Systems Div., AFSC, 
L. G. Hanscom Field, Bedford, Mas;, 
01731. (Area Code 617) CR 4-6100, 
ext. 4527. 

Symposium on the Structure of Sur- 
faces, date undetermined, at Durham, 
N. C. Sponsor: Army Research Office- 
Durham. Contact: Dr. H. M. Davis, 
Director, Metallurgy and Ceramics 
Div., Army Research Office-Durham, 
Box CM, Duke Station. Durham, N.C. 
27706. (Area Code 919), 286-2285, ext. 
31. 



AUSA Schedules 
Annual Meeting 

The Association of the United 
States Army (AUSA) will hold its 
12th animal meeting Oct. 10-12 at the 
Sheraton-Park Hotel in Washington, 
D.C. 

Speakers for this year's meeting 
will include Secretary of the Array 
Stanley R. Resor; General Harold K. 
Johnson, U. S. Army Chief of Staff; 
Lieutenant General Bruce Palmer, 
Commanding General, XVHI Air- 
borne Corps; Major General Harry 
W. O. Kinnard, Deputy Assistant 
Chief of Staff for Force Development; 
and Colonel Spurgeon Neel, former 
Surgeon for Military Assistance Com- 
mand, Vietnam; and others, 

Former President Harry S. Truman 
has been selected to receive the 
George Catlett Marshall Medal, 
AUSA's highest award. Presentation 
will be at the George Catlett Marsh- 
all Memorial Dinner on the evening 
of October 12. 

AUSA president, Elvis J. Stahr, 
former Secretary of the Army, wj' 
host a reception for all registrants 
honoring the Secretary of the Arm) 
and the Chief of Staff on the evening 
of Oct. 10. The Annual Luncheon, 
honoring the Army's Senior Com- 
manders, will be held on Oct. 11. 

More than 90,000 square feet p 
military and industrial exhibits vn 
be on display at the meeting site 
Some 27 Army agencies and com 
mands have been assigned space aions 
with 65 industrial concerns. 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Kirk H. Logic has been selected as 
Chief of the newly-established Armed 
Forces News Bureau in Washington, 
D.G. The News Bureau operates as a 
field activity of the Directorate for 
Armed Forces Information and Edu- 
cation within the Office of Asst. Secre- 
tary of Defense (Manpower). 

Bernard B. Lynn has been selected 
to succeed Edward T. Cook as Dep. 
Dir, of the Defense Contract Audit 
Agency. Cook retires Aug. 5. James 
Kuttenberg will replace Lynn as 
Deputy for Audit Management, 

Dr. Samuel J. Rabinowitz has been 
designated Acting Deputy Director of 
the Advanced Research Projects 
Agency. He replaces Dr. Robert A. 
Frosch who has been nominated for 
assignment as Asst. Secretary of the 
Navy (Research & Development). 

Dr. Donald M. MacArthur has been 
appointed as Dep. Dir. (Chemistry 
and Materials), a recently created po- 
sition in the Office of the Director, 
Defense Research & Engineer ing. 

Maj. Gen. John A. Goshorn, USA, 
has been named Dep. Dir. for 
Contract Administration Services, De- 
fense Supply Agency. He succeeds 
Maj. Gen. William W. Veal, USAF, 
who has been reassigned to Wright- 
Patterson AFB, Ohio. 

RAdm. William E. Lamos, USN, 
has been designated Dir., Far East 
Region, Office of Asst. Secretary of 
Defense (International Security Af- 
fairs). The assignment became effec- 
tive July 16, 

RAdm. William N. Leonard, USN, 
has been assigned as Asst. Dir. 
(Operational Test and Evaluation), 
Office of the Dep. Dir. (Administra- 
tion and Management), Office of the 
Dir., Defense Research & Engineering, 

Col. Grovcr Heiman Jr., USAF, has 
been named Chief, Magazine and 
Book Branch, Office of Asst. Secretary 
of Defense (Public Affairs). He re- 
places Col. C. V. Glines, USAF, who 
has been assigned as Chief, Public 
Affairs, Alaskan Command. 

Capt. Joseph S. Burkle, MC, USN, 
has been appointed Dir. of the Armed 
Forces Radiobiology Research Insti- 
tute in Bethesda, Md. 

Col. James T. Brennan, MC, USA, 
Dir, of the Armed Forces Radio- 
biology Research Institute for the last 
five years, retired from military ser- 
vice June 30. 

Col. Gerald Johnson Jr., USA, has 
been named Dir. of the Defense 
Contract Administration Services 
Region, Philadelphia, replacing Col. 
William S. Collinson, USAF, who ia 
retiring. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

General Harold K. Johnson, U.S. 
Army Chief of Staff, was awarded the 
Distinguished Service Medal, the 
Army's highest non-combat award, 
during 'ceremonies at the Pentagon 
July 13. Gen. Johnson was cited for 
meritorious service in a position of 




great responsibility as Army Chief of 

Staff from July 1964 to July 1966. 

The Chief of U.S. Army Engineers 
has announced the establishment of a 
new position of Chief Topographer in 
his office and the appointment of 
Archer Wilson to that position. 

Maj. Gen. Charles Billingslea, Dep. 
Commanding General of the U.S. 
Army Combat Developments Com- 
mand, Fort Belvoir, Va., has retired 
from service. 

Col. Eugene J. McGinnis has been 
named the new Dir. of the Aimv 
Missile Command's Procurement and 
Production Directorate at Redstone 
Arsenal, Ala. 

Col. Reuben Miimly, Dir. of the 
Army Missile Command's Missile In- 
telligence Directorate, has retired. He 
has been replaced by Col. Thomas A. 
Rodgers. 

Col. Ben Harvey Jr., has assumed 
duties as Dir., Evaluation Director- 
ate, U.S. Army Combat Develop- 
ment Command, Fort Belvoir, Va., re- 
lieving Col. William H. Vail Jr. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

RAdm, Ben, W. Sarvcr assumed the 
office of Vice Commander, Naval Ord- 
nance Systems Command on July 1. 
He comes to the assignment from 
duty as Dir. of the Surface Mis- 
sile Systems Project, Office of Naval 
Material. 

RAdm. Jackson D. Arnold is slated 
to relieve RAdm. Frank C. Jones as 
Dep. Chief of Naval Material (Logis- 
tics Support) in September. Adm. 
Jones will be reassigned to the Ship 
Systems Command. 

Maj. Gen. Keith B. McCutcheon, 
USMC, has been assigned as Dep. 
Chief of Staff (Air) at Marine Corps 
Headquarters. 

Capt. Frederic W. Corle, who has 
been selected for promotion to the 
rank of rear admiral, has been re- 
lieved as Commanding Officer, Navy 
Electronics Supply Office, Great 
Lakes, 111. by Capt. W. F. Harvey Jr. 
Capt. Corle has been reassigned as 
Commanding Officer, Naval Ships 
Parts Control Center, Mechanic sburg, 
Pa. 

Capt. John W. Wade has been as- 
signed duties as Dep. Commander, 
Naval Supply Systems Command 
(Transportation). 

Capt. C. W. Pittnmn Jr. has reliev- 
ed Capt. F. M. Blanchard as Com- 
manding; Officer, Naval Air Technical 
Services Facility, Philadelphia. 

The Naval Facilities Engineering 
Command (NFEC) announces the fol- 
lowing command assignments: 



Capt. Henry J. Johnson relieved 
Capt. William E. Davidson as Dep. 
Dir., NFEC, Pacific Div. Capt. John 
D. Burky became Commanding Officer 

of the Naval Construction Battalion 
Center, Davisville, R.I., replacing 
Capt. Joseph H. Barker Jr., who re- 
tired. 

Capt. Davidson took command of 
Capt. Burky's former post as Com- 
manding Officer, Western Div., NFEC. 
Capt. Ralph B. Grahl assumed com- 
mand of the Public Works Center, 
Guam, relieving Capt. Harry Stevens 
Jr., who took Capt. Johnson's form- 
er post as Commanding Officer of 
NFEC Eastern Div. Capt. Bernard 
O. Roessler reports as Commanding 
Officer of the Public Works Center, 
Newport, R.I. He replaces Capt. Rich- 
ard T. Pratt who has retired. 

Capt. Albert R. Marschall will re- 
lieve Capt. Nelson U. Anderson as 
Commander of the 30th Naval Con- 
struction Regiment. Capt. Bryan S. 
Pichett will relieve Capt. Joseph W. 
Frorath as Commanding Officer, 
Northwest Div. NFEC. Capt. Frorath 
will relieve Capt. John A. Stelger 
as Dep. Commander, Atlantic Div. 
NFEC. Capt. Stelger will retire. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Maj. Gen. Ben I. Funk, Command- 
er of Space Systems Division, Air 
Force Systems Command, will retire 
Sept. 1. He will be replaced by Brig. 
Gen. Paul T. Cooper. 

Maj. Gen. William W. Veal return- 
ed to duty with the Air Force Logis- 
tics Command Aug. 1, replacing Brig. 
Gen. William G. Lee Jr., as Dir. 
of Plans and Programs at AFLC 
headquarters. Gen. Lee has retired. 

Maj. Gen. C. B. Root, Mobile Air 
Material Area Commander, will re- 
tire from active military service in 
October. He has served at Mobile 
since Feb. 1, 1965. 

Maj. Gen. Richard S. Abbey has 
been assigned as Asst. Chief of Staff 
for Reserve Forces at USAF head- 
quarters-. 

Brig. Gen. Robert C. Richardson 
III, Dep. Chief of Staff (Science & 
Technology), AFSC headquarters, is 
scheduled to become Dep. Command- 
er, Defense Atomic Support Agency 
Field Command, Sandia Base, N.M, 

Brig. Gen. William R. Yancey, Vice 
Commander, Aeronautical Systems 
Div., (AFSC), is scheduled for re- 
tirement on Sept. 1. 

Col. Louis O. Adler has been reas- 
signed to the Air Force Systems Com- 
mand as Dep. for Special Contracts 
in the Office of the Dep. Chief of 
Staff (Procurement Production). 

Col, Edward H. Robertson has been 
assigned as Chief, Procurement Office, 
Space Systems Div. (AFSC), Los 
Angeles. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 




Electronic Data 
in the Innerspace/ Aerospace 

by 
Cdr. Eugene Gralla, SC, USN 



o Extend the project to othe 
laboratories in the general area. 

s Modify or replace the Pmen 
computers to permit remote 
"on-line." 

o Expand the concept 



Early in 1964 the Management In- 
formation Division, Office of Naval 
Material, conceived an idea which 
later was approved and elevated to 
quasi-project status by the Deputy 
Chief of Naval Material, Rear Ad- 
miral R, L. Shifley. He directed Man- 
agement Information Division to 
"connect remote communications units 
to a Navy-owned, large-scale com- 
puter for a rapid reply system to 
solve day-to-day engineering prob- 
lems." 

This "go" sign fired a previously 
designated study group to such a de- 
gree that today turn-around time in 
the solution of engineering problems 
has been slashed downward from ap- 
proximately four days to four hours 
or less. Within the next several 
months, it is envisioned that the 
"Remote Computing/Time Sharing" 
methodology currently being pursued 
by the Navy will provide the media 
to solve engineering/scientific prob- 
lems almost immediately. 

This current ADP endeavor becomes 
another first in pioneering efforts in 
electronic data processing in the 
Navy an effort that had its begin- 
ning in the mid-fifties at research fa- 
cilities in eastern universities followed 
by actual operation of a prototype 
computer at the Aviation Supply Of- 
fice in Philadelphia. 

At the completion, then, of a period 
of about 15 years experience, remote 
computing becomes the ultimate in 
ADP advancement to bring Navy's 
vast inventory of computational abil- 
ity closer to the personnel requiring 
its services. In this manner, the 
Navy's computers become available 
simultaneously to serve many users in 
solving many different problems. 

In Retrospect. 

Initially, the Remote Computing 
Study Group, sponsored by the Chief 
of Naval Material (CNM), decided 
that only one of three laboratories in 
the Washington, D.C., area involved 
in the project would be used to ex- 
plore the vast potential of remote 



8 



problem solving and to evaluate the 
testing. However, each of the three 
laboratories providing membership on 
the study group namely, Naval 
Ordnance Laboratory, White Oak, 
Md.; the Naval Weapons Laboratory, 
Dahlgren, Va., and the David Taylor 
Model Basin, Carderock, Md. volun- 
teered. 

It was then decided that each 
laboratory would jointly participate 
by developing its own capability and, 
after full operation, advance the 
project goals from there. In subse- 
quent weeks the study group launched 
into a nine-point program to: 

Designate "prototype" labora- 
tories. 

Train engineers in the use of 
simplified programming. 

Develop standard programs for 
repetitive problem calculations. 

Install remote devices "off-line" 
to the activity's computer to provide 
easier access for engineers. 

Solve small engineering routines 
faster and at lower cost. 

Utilize available computer time to 
the fullest. 




Cdr. Eugene Gralla, SC, USN, is 
Head of the Information Systems De- 
sign and Control Branch of the Man- 
agement Information Division for the 
Chief of Naval Material. 



Examples of Today's Progress. 

A few noteworthy examples of th 
Navy's current advancement and us 
of the Remote Computing ADP Tecli 
nique are; 

Naval Weapons Laboratory, Dahl 
gren. The Naval Weapons Laboratw 
(NWL), Dahlgrren, Va., has thd mia 
sion task and Navy responsibility t 
"conduct theoretical and experiments 
studies of computing machines an. 
machine components, and of more ad 
vanced and effective means of compy 
tation as well as analyses, evaluation 
and design of data processing ays 
terns." Consequently, NWL Dahlgre; 
was vitally concerned and initiated : 
research approach in remote comput 
ing. This undertaking was to enabl 
NWL Dahlgren to evaluate direct 
access computing- concepts experi 
mentally by utilizing both existmi 
systems and a NWL research systetr 

Preliminary work with existini 
systems has been useful. Today, hern 
ever, at NWL Dahlgren most effort 
are being concentrated on the NW! 
pilot system, which, when operatiotia 
can be used Navy-wide. 

To accelerate its pace and step u 
its ADP research, NWL Dahlgren ha 
installed one of the first modnla 
"third generation computers." Thi 
newly advanced equipment has r 
cently been augmented with user tei 
minals to include cathode ray tub 
displays, light pens, alphanumeri 
keyboards and function keyboards. 

Plans for this facility include th 
use of general purpose language 
such as FORTRAN, console commu 
nication languages, display-oriente 
languages such as those for analo, 
simulation and symbol manipulntioi 

Within the next few months, a sys 
tern which will run under an ele 
mentary monitor, and which will timf 
share the two consoles with a bacl< 
ground problem is expected to be oi 
erational. There will initially be tw 
user languages. One, called AA, 
(Analyst Assistance Program), is ; 
partial subset of FORTRAN and i 
intended mainly as a computation* 
aid for exploratory analysis; th 
other is an analog simulation lar 
guage. AAP will permit the user t 

August 196i 



compose, modify, or use parts of a 
program via the light pen. The values 
of the variables and the function and 
codes available are visually presented 
on the cathode ray tube (CRT) dis- 
play. 

o Development of Graphic Pro- 
grams at NWL Dahlgren. Work is 
currently under way on the develop- 
ment of a collection of graphic pro- 
grams to be used either separately or 
incorporated in a display-oriented 
conversational FORTRAN system 
which is presently under development. 
Work on symbol manipulation (a pro- 
cedure for the use of formal mathe- 
matics in the solution of differential 
equations or the algebra of series) is 
presently being continued as a sepa- 
rate phase; the specifications for its 
implementation have not yet been 
fully determined. 

The overall project objective is to 
improve the usefulness of the com- 
puter as a tool for mathematicians, 
scientists and engineers. This can be 
done by providing them with direct 
access to a large, time-shared com- 
puter system, thereby improving the 
response time and permitting the user 
to make on-line decisions that other- 
wise would have to be pre-pro- 
grammed, sometimes at considerable 
expense and sometimes not possible. 
Results of this pilot study of ter- 



minals, languages, graphic displays, 
etc., are expected to be an invaluable 
aid in the development of very large 
operational time-shared systems for 
use at Dahlgren and other similar 
laboratories. 

Navy Automated Research and 
Development Information System 
(NARDIS). NARDIS is an informa- 
tion system under the direction of the 
Chief of Naval Research and sup- 
ported by the Office of Naval Re- 
search, Bureau of Ships and the 
Bureau of Naval Weapons. The sys- 
tem's basic objective is to establish 
and maintain a common data bank 
of scientific, technical and adminis- 
trative information on all Navy-spon- 
sored reseai-ch and development. This 
data bank may be used as a prime 
source of RDT&E information by all 
military, management, scientific and 
technical echelons of the Navy. 

Future developments for NARDIS 
will be oriented toward a real-time 
system with remote control features. 
Plans for these developments are 
evolving and will come to fruition 
once the present computer system has 
been well established and evaluated. 
It is anticipated that plans for future 
development of NARDIS will incor- 
porate and emphasize random access 
devices such as disc files, drums, etc. 
In addition, plans will include remote 




Data Processing Center, Naval Weapons Laboratory, Dahlgren, Va. 



control features which will permit the 
user to communicate with and query 
the NARDIS data bank from his lo- 
cation. 

o U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis. 
Within weeks the midshipmen may 
find their problem solving made 
easier. Remote terminal equipment 
tied into a computer center will en- 
able the faculty and student body to 
use the most effective methods and 
the great potential afforded by ADPE. 

Of cm-rent and particular interest 
at the academy is the contribution 
that the remote computing method- 
ology might make to the 3,500 mid- 
shipmen in the modem and rapid solu- 
tion of assigned mathematical prob- 
lems. 

Remote Computing Timetable. 

The original phasing of the time- 
table to achieve the objectives of the 
p&tential of remote computing within 
the Naval Material Support Establish- 
ment was as follows: 

Phase I. Off-line stacking of small 
scientific/engineering jobs (usually 
programmed by the personnel request- 
ing the services) for batch processing 
several times per day, through a large 
size computer, to permit four-hour or 
less turn-around time to the user. 

Phase II. Use of a small size com- 
puter to test the economic feasibility 
of several types of remote terminals 
winch concurrently process small 
scientific/engineering applications in- 
cluding programming preparation. 

Phase III. Use of a medium size 
computer to process small scientific/ 
engineering applications from remote 
terminals concurrently while simul- 
taneously processing a direct user 
small background program. 

Phase IV. Use of a large size 
computer or multiple Central Process- 
ing Unit (CPU) system to produc- 
tively process a large scientific 
background program simultaneously 
with several small scientific/en- 
gineering programs entered from 
numerous and various types of input/ 
output remote terminals located in- 
house and at other Navy activities. 
This would be the start of the Scien- 
tific/Engineering ADPS Service Cen- 
ter. 

Phase V. Use of a large size 
computer or multiple CPU system to 
process productively a large business 
background program simultaneously 

(Continued on Page 13) 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



S M T W T F S 

123456 

7 a 9 10 11 12 13 

,14 15 16,17 IS 19 20 

>il 22 23 24 25 26 271 
" 29 30 31 I 



S M T W T F S 

1 2 3 

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 
18 !9 20 21 22 23 24 

25 26 27 28 2S 30 



S M T W T F S 



2345678 

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 

3D 31 _ 



SPEAKERS CALENDAR 



DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Gen. Frank S. Besson Jr., Com- 
manding General, Army Materiel 
Command, at 21st Annual Transpor- 
tation and Logistics Forum, National 
Defense Transportation Association, 
Dallas, Tex., Sept. 20. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

RAdm. R. L. Sliifley, Vice Chief of 
Naval Material, at Armed Forces 
Staff College, Norfolk, Va., Sept. 8. 

RAdm. A. R. Gralla, Commander 
Naval Ordnance Systems Command, 
at Underwater Warfare Seminar, 
Newport, R.I., Sept. 12. 

RAdm. Pierre Charbonnet, Com- 
mandant, 8th Naval District, at Hot 
Springs Navy League Council, Hot 
Springs, Ark., Sept. 13. 

RAdm. Jack S. Dorsey, Command- 
ant, 6th Naval District, at South Caro- 
lina Buttonhole Club, Greenville, S.C., 
Sept. 13. 

RAdm. J. P. Sager, Asst. for Ma- 
terial Acquisition, Naval Air Systems 
Command, at Logistics Management 
Symposium, Huntsville, Ala., Sept. 13. 



RAdm. E. F. Metzger, Commanding 
Officer, Navy Supply Center, Oakland, 
Calif., at National Defense Trans- 
portation Assn. Meeting, Dallas, Tex., 
Sept. 19. 

RAdm. Henry H. Caldwell, Com- 
mander, Fleet Air Jacksonville, at 
Douglas Management Club Meeting, 
Sacramento, Calif., Sept. 21. 

VAdm. I. J. Galantin, Chief of Na- 
val Material, at Navy-Industry Ma- 
terial Reliability Conference, Shore- 
ham Hotel, Washington, D.C., Oct. 26; 
at American Society of Naval Archi- 
tects and Marine Engineers, . Hilton 
Hotel, New York City, Nov. 11. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Hon. L. Marks Jr., Asst. Secretary 
of the Air Force, (Financial Man- 
agement), at CPA Society Meeting, 
Los Angeles, Calif., Sept. 12. 

Hon. Harold Brown, Secretary of 
the Air Force, at AFA Anniversary 
Banquet, Washington, D.C., Sept. 16. 

Gen. J. P. McConnell, Chief of Staff, 
U.S. Air Force, at AFA Anniversary 



Banquet, Washington, D.C., Sept, IS 
at Defense Orientation Conferee 
Assn. Meeting, Washington, D.C 
Sept. 30; at American Ordnance Assii 
Meeting, Los Angeles, Calif., Oct. 5-6 
at International Congress on At 
Technology-, Hot Springs, Ark., Oel 
28. 

Gen. G. P. Disosway, Commandei 
Tactical Air Command, at Chambe 
of Commerce, Oklahoma City, Okla 
Sept. 16. 

Maj. Gen. H. E. Humfeld, Cora 
mandcr, 1st Strategic Aerospace Div 
Strategic Air Command, at Nations 
Security Industrial Assn. Meeting 
Vandenberg AFB, Calif., Sept. 23. 

Maj. Gen. G. F. Keeling, Deput; 
Chief of Staff, Procurement and Pro 
duction, Air Force Systems Com 
mand, at National Security Industrit 
Assn. Meeting, L. G. Hanacom Fiek 
Mass., Sept. 28. 

Maj. Gen. H. B, Manson, Coir 
mander Air Force Flight Test Cer 
tor, Edwards AFB, Calif., at Trad 
Club Meeting, Bakersfield, Calif 
Oct. 19. 




Aug. 23-24: Procurement Conference 
in conjunction with the Sixth An- 
nual Maine Products Show, Port- 
land, Maine. Contact: Clarence F. 
McKay, Maine Department of Eco- 
nomic Development, Stale Office 
Building, Augusta, Maine. 

Sept. 2-3: Canadian International Air 
Show, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 

Sept. 5-11: National Championship 
Air Race, Reno, Nev. 

Sept. 8-9 : Business Opportunities 
Conference, Milwaukee, Wis. Con- 
tact: Lee Berndt, Executive Secre- 
tary, Metropolitan Jaycecs, 2000 
13th Ave., Milwaukee, Wis. 

Sept. 11-16: American Chemical So- 
ciety Meeting, New York City. 

Sept. 13-15: National Security Indus- 
trial Assn.-U.S. Air Force Electron- 
ics Conference (Secret), Murray 
Hall, U.S. Naval Station, Boston, 
Mass. 

Sept. 14: Procurement Conference, 
Rochester, N.Y, Contact: Rochester 
Chamber of Commerce, 55 St. Paul 
St., Rochester, N.Y. 

Sept. 14-16: Air Force Assn. Aero- 
space Development Briefings/Dis- 
plays, Sheraton Park Hotel, Wash- 
ington, D.C. 

Sept. 17-18: Midwestern Aviation & 
Space Exposition. Willow Run Air- 
port, Detroit, Mich. 



Sept. 18-21: National Defense Trans- 
portation Assn. Meeting, Dallas, 
Tex. 

Sept. 18-21: American Institute of 
Chemical Engineers Meeting, At- 
lantic City, N.J. 

Sept. 18-22; American Society for In- 
dustrial Security Meeting, Phila- 
delphia, Pa. 

Sept. 19-20 : Government-Industry 
Procurement Conference, Portland, 
Ore. Contact: S. H. Mallicoat, Dept. 
of Commerce, State of Oregon, Div. 
of Planning & Development, Port- 
land, Ore. 

Sept. 21: International Atomic Energy 
Agency Meeting, Vienna, Austria. 

Sept, 22-23: Government-Industry 
Procurement Clinic, Seattle, Wash. 
Contact: Tom Hvnes Jr., Dept. of 
Commerce & Economic Develop- 
ment, 312 First Avc., N., Seattle, 
Wash. 

Sept. 24-Oct. 2: Greater Jackson 
Chamber of Commerce Midwest 
Space Fair, Jackson, Mich. 

Sept. 27-30; American Roentgen Kay 
Society Meeting, San Francisco. 
Calif. 

Sept. 28-29: National Security Indus- 
trial Assn. Marine Geodesy Sym- 
posium, Columbus, Ohio. 



Oct. 3-5: International Electronic 

Conference and Exhibition, McCoi 

mick Place, Chicago, 111. 
Oct. 3-5: Institute of Electrical an 

Electronics Engineers Aerospai 

and Electronics Convention, Slien 

ton-Park Hotel, Washington, D.C. 
Oct. 4-6: American Oil Chemists Soc 

ety Meeting, Philadelphia, Pa. 
Oct. 5-7: International Assn. of Ele 

trical League Meeting, Scottsdal 

Ariz. 
Oct. 6: National Security Industn 

Assn. Annual Meeting and Dmnt 

Washington, D.C. 
Oct. 7: Society of American Milltai 

Engineers Meeting, St. Paul, Mjn 
Oct. 9-1-1 : Electrochemical Socie 

Meeting, Philadelphia, Pa. 
Oct. 10-12: Assn. of the U.S. Aril 

Meeting, Sheraton-Park Hot 

Washington, D.C. 
Oct. 11-13: Armed Forces Manag 

ment Assn. National Confereni 

Shoreham Hotel, Washington, I). 
Oct. 27-28: Tulsa Chamber of Coi 

merce Air Festival, Riverside A! 

port, Tulsa, Okla. 
Oct. 31-Nov. 2: Defense Supply A 

National Convention, Benjam 

Franklin Hotel, Philadelphia, ?* 
Nov. 8-10: Joint Computer Conff 

ence, San Francisco, Calif. 



10 



August 19' 




Col. Robert E. Lee, USAF 
Director of Procurement Policy, Headquarters USAF 



The pin-pose of this article is to dis- 
cuss problems encountered in the C- 
5A competition, the lessons learned, 
and changes to be effected by the Air 
Foi'ce in future total package buys. 
We have had Air Force teams working 
since the C-5A award on just that 
subject and we have many changes 
under consideration. Later in the arti- 
cle, I will discuss some of the more 
significant lessons learned, 

First, I want to clarify just what we 
are discussing. The Total Package 
Procurement Concept is an extension 
of long-standing procurement policy. 
It can be defined as follows: 

The procurement of, after a sin- 
gle competition, engineering de- 
velopment and production of sys- 
tems, and as much support as is 
feasible such as aerospace ground 
equipment, spares, training de- 
vices and training support, and 
contractor technical support. 

The key words in this definition are 
"a single competition." There is noth- 
ing new about Total Package Concept 
(TPC) the newness is the degree to 
which it was applied. 

Traditionally, wo have always had 
some degree of competition, technical 
or price, or both, for our major weapon 
system programs. But for the follow- 
on production, we have frequently 
found ourselves in a sole source posi- 
tion, "locked in" with the research and 
development contractor. When we 
made our decision to buy the program, 
much of that decision was based on 
promises made by the contractor for 
the performance and cost of the sys- 
tem in production and solely on the 
R&D effort. Our experience has taught 
us that these promises tend to be opti- 
mistic when a program is being 
"sold." The total package concept 
makes these promises contractually 
binding. 

The Air Force Experience. 

To date the Total Package Procure- 
ment Concept (TPPC) has been ap- 
plied up to contract award on only one 

system the C-5A aircraft. 



Other programs have been identi- 
fied for total package procurement in 
all of the Services and are in various 
preliminary stages. Although the C- 
5A is the first total package procure- 
ment, the total package concept is not 
the only first of this program. The 
C-5A is the first system to undergo 
a comprehensive contract definition 
pursuant to DOD Directive 3200.9 and 
the first system in which the complete 
Air Force Systems Command 375 
series of program management docu- 
ments have been applied from the out- 
sot. 

A Request for Proposal (RPP) con- 
taining, among other things, a Work 
Statement and Model Contract for 
Contract Definition, and a Work 
Statement and Model Contract for de- 
velopment and acquisition of the C-5A 
aircraft, was distributed on Dec. 11, 
1964, to the three airi'rame and two 
engine contractors who had partici- 
pated in the parametric studies lead- 
ing up to the approval of the C-5A 
program. On Dec. 31, 1964, the Air 
Force entered into a contract defini- 
tion contract with each of these five 
contractors. The work statement 
called for the identification and prep- 
aration of performance specifications 
to bo used in the operational system, 
as well as price proposals for develop- 
ment, production and support of such 
hardware. 

Support would include all required 
aeronautical ground equipment, train- 
ing equipment and contractor techni- 
cal services, together with spares and 
maintenance through the Category II 
Test Period. Spares beyond Category 
II would bo added to the contract by 
provisioning action and would be 
priced in accordance with a detailed 
pricing exhibit in the contract. Award 
of a contract would be made to the 
soui-ce whose cost and technical pro- 
posals as evaluated by the Air Force 
demonstrated the greatest overall cost 
effectiveness over a ten-year operating 
period of the system, complying with 
all of the minimum performance re- 
quirements established in the RFP. To 
this end the contractor was required 



to prepare a ten-year operating cost 
estimate on certain given assumptions. 
This was to be added to the research, 
development, test and evaluation 
(RDT&E) and production costs and 
compared with the productivity of the 
proposed system over the same period. 
Although the initial production air- 
frame buy was only 57 aircraft, a 
priced option was requested on 68 
more. Costs and other factors for 
source selection purposes was to be 
computed on a buy of 115 Total Op- 
erational Systems. 

The technical proposals were sub- 
mitted on April 20, 1965, and the cost 
proposals on April 27, 1965. 

From a procurement point of view, 
our major problems were to devise 
and negotiate a definitive contract 
that would fix responsibility for the 
aforementioned premises. How did we 
do it? 

In the contract, in addition to all 
the normal provisions, there are spe- 
cific clauses imposing responsibility 
for the total C-5A on the airframc 
contractor. The really significant pro- 
visions are designed to hold the win- 
ner to the commitments on which 
selection was based. In the air vehicle 
contract, and most significant of these 
special provisions, are: 

Pricing. The contract has firm tar- 
get prices for 116 aircraft and the 
development necessary to produce 
them. In addition, all aerospace 
ground equipment (AGE), training 
and training equipment, contractor 
support, and spares through Category 
II testing are firm priced. The incen- 
tive cost sharing arrangement has a 
firm BO/BO sharing below target cost 
and a 70/30 sharing above target cost 
to a ceiling price that is 130 percent 
of target cost. 

Performance. The performance 
commitments established in competi- 
tion are backed up by a correction of 
deficiencies clause under which the 
contractor must, if so directed by the 
Air Force, correct any deficiency at 
no change in target or ceiling price. 
The performance requirements stated 
in the contract are those proposed by 
the contractor which must equal or 
exceed the RFP requirements. 

Performance Incentive. Since the 
correction of deficiencies provisions 
cover any case of performance less 
than that promised, there is no nega- 
tive incentive. There is a reward in- 
centive based on achievement against 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



11 



a productivity index set forth in the 
contract. The productivity index is 
based on payload, range and cruise 
speed. A 15 percent improvement 
against the productivity index target 
will provide a maximum reward of 
$22.5 million. 

o Specification Changes. On individ- 
ual changes up to 5100,000, there will 
be no adjustment in the target cost. 
On changes over 100,000 there will 
be a target price and ceiling price 
adjustment, including a profit not to 
exceed 10 percent until all such 
changes aggregate three percent of 
the initial total target cost. Thereafter 
the profit increment cannot exceed 
two percent. The intent of these pro- 
visions is to discourage the contractor 
from proposing unnecessary changes. 
However, on individual changes ex- 
ceeding one percent of the initial tar- 
get cost, this two percent profit limita- 
tion will not apply, because such a 
change would represent a significant 
departure from the initial work state- 
ment. 

Delivery Incentive. The contract 
provides a penalty of $12,000 per day 
late for each of the first 16 aircraft 
delivered up to a maximum penalty of 
?11 million. This is a liquidated dam- 
ages clause, 

Schedule Change. There is a for- 
mula for changing the end-item prices 
if the delivery schedule is compressed 
or stretched out. This is an example 
of clauses designed to preclude any 
negotiation in a sole source environ- 
ment. 



furnished, it was necessary for the 
airframe manufacturer to negotiate 
an agreement with the engine manu- 
facturer under which the responsibili- 
ties of the manufacturers to each 
other are specified. Thus, the Air 
Force, although buying the engines 
direct and furnishing them to the air- 
frame contractor, can look to the air- 
frame contractor if the airframe/ 
engine combination does not meet its 
performance "in the air." 

Each of the five contractors' pro- 
posals was submitted in 30 copies and 
the total mass of data received 
weighed 35 tons. Over 400 people 
spent two and one-half months for a 
total of 132,000 manhours in reading 
and evaluating these proposals. De- 
finitive Fixed Price Incentive (FPI) 
contracts for RDT&E, delivery of 57 
total systems, and support as outlined 
above wei'e negotiated and signed by 
each of the contractors prior to the 
source selection announcement on 
Sept. 30, 1965, a total of 10 months 
from Contract Definition Phase 
(GDP) to a definitive production con- 
tract on a major Air Force system, 

That's enough on what we bought 
and how we bought it. Let's look 
briefly at some of the significant les- 
sons learned. 

First, it appears that we should 
adopt the TPC earlier in the cycle 
than we did on the C-5. The short 
time that was allotted to get out an 
KFP caused many problems and 
changes, which contributed to the 
massive data we received. Procure- 
ment planning must be formalized in 
the conceptual state of the GDP. 



We believe that the detailed mbai 
sions in the areas of AGE and sp gr , 
were not practicable and we are ' 
siclering changing this approach S 
ended up with a formula methodota 
for pricing some spare parts and 
price list for pricing those acqufo 
after the completion of Category 
testing. 

Also, we now believe that we c; 
reduce much of the management R> 
procurement information that was t 
quired, through the establishment . 
a data matrix to select what data 
necessary for each phase. We achiev, 
outstanding success in the use of tl 
model contract technique and as a t 
suit of our C-B experience will prc 
ably use this technique on all CK 
petitive CDP's. This technique, requi 
ing the preparation of model eontm 
during GDP, is set up for the purpo 
of getting all of the boiler plate, sp 
cial provisions, and other knotty prc 
lems including legal coordinatii 
resolved prior to actual contract 
selection. 

Some people are firmly conviiw 
that the most important achicveme 
of TPC was obtaining a complete 
definitizcd document under a compe 
tive umbrella. This could not ha 
been done had we not fully exploit 
the model contract during GDP. \ 
are firmly convinced that the mcrea 
in data requirements that will ul 
mately result from GDP and the Tl 
will be well worth this particular e 
result. 

We did run into some problems 

our cost effectiveness approach, p 

mai'ily because we didn't establish o 

ast effectiveness criteria ea: 

nough. We are concentrating mu 

(fort in this area, particularly as 




DOD Instruction 3200,8, "Standards 
'or Documentation of Technical Re~ 
jorfs under the DOD Scientific and 
"echnical Information Program," 
[larch 7, 19GG. Supplements DOD In- 
fraction 5129.43, dated Jan. 22, 1963. 
ts primary purpose is to simplify and 
mprove document control and catalog- 
ng procedures for technical reports 
lerived from research and develop- 
nent activities of DOD, 

DOD Directive 5210.50, "Investiga- 
ion of and Disciplinary Action Con- 
lected with Unauthorized Disclosure 
if Classified Defense Information,'* 
ipril 29, 1966. Assigns responsibility 
ind the authority to establish policy 
'or investigating unauthorized disclo- 
iiircs of classified defense information 
md for insuring prompt corrective ac- 
,ion, including appropriate discipline 
if personnel for such disclosures. 

DOD Directive 3020.2, "Policy for 
Protection of Petroleum Installations 
ind Related Facilities," May 4, I960, 
Sets forth DOD policy pertaining to 
;he protection against sabotage and 
inemy action of existing and planned 
DOD petroleum installations and re- 
sted facilities, including commercially 
'urnished storage facilities. Additional 
iclicy guidance is given with_ respect 
;o the acquisition of commercial stor- 
ige facilities on a long-term basis as 
luthorizcd under Section 2388 of Title 
LO, U. S. Codo. Uniform criteria are 
H'ovided for the accomplishment of 
protective construction measures. 

DOD Instruction 7041.9, "Cost In- 
formation Report (CIK)," June HI, 
1966. Provides guidance for the 
implementation of DOD Directive 
7041.1, "Cost and Economic Informa- 
tion System," dated July 7, 1964, 
Including an identification of the 
families of weapon/ support systems 
iffected and the CIR data required. 

DOD Directive 3030.32, "Depart- 
ment of Defense Policy for the De- 
velopment and Utilization of Fallout 
Shelters," June 20, 1966. Provides 
uniform guidance on objectives, poli- 
cies and criteria for determining the 
nature of fallout shelter require- 
ments, and for developing a plan for 
fallout shelter programs at all DOD 
installations in implementation of Sec- 
tion 608 of Public Law 89-188, dated 
Sept. 16, 1965. 



DOD directives and instructions 
maybe obtained from: 
Publications Distribution Branch 
Office of the Secretary of Defense 
Room SB 200, The Pentagon 
Washington, D. C. 20301 



Defense Procurement Circular No. 

42, May 27, 1966. (1) Service Con- 
tracts Notice of Intention. (2) Re- 
vised List of Educational or Non- 
Profit Institutions with Approved 
Patent Policies. (3) Small Business 
Size Standards for Fluid Milk. (4) 
Equal Employment Opportunity. 

Defense Procurement Circular No, 

43, June 3, 1966. Revisions to ASPR 
Section XXI Procurement Manage- 
ment Reporting System. 

Defense Procurement Circular No. 

44, June 14, 1S66. (1) Standardized 
Contract Administration Services for 
the Military Departments. (2) Suspen- 
sion of work. 

Defense Procureine.nl Circular No. 

45, June 24, lUfifi. (1) Responsibility 
of Prospective Contractors. (2) Uni- 
form Procurement Instrument Identi- 
fication Numbering System. (3) Re- 
porting of Procurement in Support of 
Southeast Asia. 



Each Defense Procurement Cir- 
cular is designed to place new or 
changed policy or procedures in 
effect prior to publication of an 
Armed Services Procurement Regu- 
lation (ASPR) revision. ASPR sub- 
scribers will receive DPC's and 
ASPR revisions through the Super- 
intendent of Documents, U. S. Gov- 
ernment Printing Office, Washing- 
ton, D. C. 20402. 



United States Government Organi- 
zation Manual, 1966-67. Official organ- 
ization handbook of the Federal Gov- 
ernment. Catalog No. GS 4.109:966. 
$2, 

Electromagnetic Testing (For In- 
spection of Material). One of a series 
of volumes covering the field of non- 
destructive testing for use in accom- 
plishing quality and reliability assur- 
ance operations for DOD material. 
Catalog No. D 7.6/2 :B4. $1.25. 

System Engineering Management 
Procedures. An Air Force Systems 
Command manual which establishes 
and describes a methodology for ac- 
complishing the system engineering 
management process. Catalog No. D 
301.46/14:376-5. $2.75. 

Symposium on Technology Status 
and Trends, Contains 26 papers pre- 
sented at the Symposium on Technol- 
ogy Status and Trends, held April 21- 
23, 1965, in Huntsville. Ala. Catalog 
No. NAS 1.21:6030. $1.50. 

Nuclear Weapons and The Atlantic 
Alliance. A bibliographic survey pre- 
pared for the Director of Strategic 
Plans and Policy, Office of the Deputy 
Chief of Staff for Military Opera- 



tions, Department of the Army (DA 
Pamphlet 20-66) . It explores the 
various issues that confront NATO, 
including those dealing with the con- 
trol and employment of nuclear 
weapons and the broader aspects of 
the defense of Western Europe, as 
well as the many elements of the 
East-West strategic balance with 
NATO as the crux of the balance. 
$1.50. 



Publications that require remit- 
tance are available for purchase 
from the Superintendent of Docu- 
ments, U. S. Government Printing 
Office, Washington, D. C. 20402. 



Remote Computing 

(Continued from Page 0) 
with several small and medium busi- 
ness/logistics programs. The latter 
would be entered both from slow 
speed terminals and from high 
speed terminals sometimes located at 
remote ADP sites. This would be the 
start of the Business/Logistics ADPS 
Service Center. 

It was originally felt that it would 
take a period of five years to accom- 
plish the five phases of the project. 
However, with the interest and ac- 
tivity demonstrated to date, the ADPS 
Service Centers should be operational 
in three years or less. 

Remote computing will eventually 
close the gap that now exists be- 
tween the use of a slide rule and the 
extremely complex task of preparing 
and programming a computer run, 
delivering it to the data processing 
center and waiting perhaps hours for 
a solution. The remote computing con- 
cept is almost like having a computer 
of your own as far away as your 
finger tips-^-continuously "at your 
service" regardless of your physical 
location. You can be within reach or 
you could be at a distance of some 
hundreds of miles. 

Whatever your position might be 
in today's progressive data processing 
environment, remote computing is the 
ascending technique the status sym- 
bol for the individual or activity get- 
ting ahead. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



13 



by 

Maj. Gen. Vincent G. Huston, USAF 

Commander, Air Force Eastern Test Range 

Air Force Systems Command 



The Air Force Eastern Test Range 
(AFETR) is in terms of work force, 
geography, investment and activity 
the largest of six Defense Department 
National Range sites. The other five 
are the Air Force's Western Test 
Range and Satellite Control Facility; 
the Army's White Sands Missile 
Range and Kwajalein Test Site; and 
the Navy's Pacific Missile Range. 
Through its Cape Kennedy operations, 
AFETR has become a world-renowned 
news dateline, the spawning ground 
for most of the nation's missile and 
space progress, and the logical 
threshold for many of tomorrow's 
more ambitious objectives. 

In the fantastic growth and events 
of AFETR's 15-year history, one 
other vital aspect of Cape Kennedy 
operations has been overshadowed. 
This is the experience-tempered team- 
work that has developed between Gov- 
ernment and private industry, The ef- 
forts of Federal and commercial orga- 
nizations located through the United 
States meet at Cape Kennedy, From 
this focal point these efforts are dif- 
fused into practical uses ranging from 
apace exploration to combat readiness 
with military units in the field. 

Some 30 military and other Federal 
agencies are permanently represented 
at AFETR, which is a component of 
the Air Force Systems Command's 
National Range Division. These and 
the more than three score organiza- 
tions of the aerospa'ce industrial com- 
munity total a work force now in ex- 
- of 27,000 people. This total does 



ment 
per- 



The Eastern Test Range work 
force consists of 18,900 military, 
Federal civilians and contractor peo- 
ple. At the center of this functional 
structure, called simply "the Range," 
are 4,200 military and Government 
civilians organically assigned to the 
AFETR. In addition, there are 14,700 
other military and civilian Govern- 
ment personnel and contractor em- 
ployees engaged in services needed 
to operate and maintain the range. A 
major segment of this latter group, 
which is under the operational con- 
trol of the range commander, is em- 
ployed by Pan American World Air- 
ways and the Radio Corporation of 
America. 

On the other side of the equation 
at the Eastern Test Range are 8,400 
people assigned to Government orga- 
nizations and contractors employed in 
development and testing of missiles, 
spacecraft and associated subsys- 
tems. This segment of activity at 
ETR is called "Range Users" and is 
engaged in assembly, checkout, launch, 
or other phases of vehicle experimen- 
tation and evaluation. In addition, 



the Eastern Test Range serves as ho; 
to over 50,000 official visitors an 
transients each year. 

The range is a high-precision, higf 
capacity flight test facility for a 
larger classes of missile and spa 
craft research and development, Tli 
primary product of the range is di?.| 
nostic data, These data are measim 
by every available means and n 
corded in large quantities in real-tin 
to a nine-digit accuracy. Many othi 
services are required as a corollai 
to these data products. They inctuc 
the assurance of range and ftigl 
safety, communications, launch ser 
ices, the manufacture of liipi 
oxygen, and ocean search and i 
covery. These services are in dira 
support of stated range-user need 
The range must also perform Eel 
support services ranging from tl 
sophisticated (optical calibration, f 
example) to the commonplace (ba 
logistic support). 

The establishment of AFETR f 
cilities and services conforms to f 
fundamental pattern set out in 19 
by the Congress in creating the ran( 



accomplishments of AFETR. 
14 



AIR FORCE EASTERN TEST RANGE 




Specifically, it was the intent of Con- 
gress that those test facilities or serv- 
ices needed by two or more agencies, 
or their contractors, should be pro- 
vided from a common resource base. 
This was because, by so doing, more 
effective operation of hardware hav- 
ing higher standards and greater 
compatibility could be achieved over 
a longer period at greater economy. 
In 15 years, this thesis has been re- 
peatedly proven. 

Physically, the range stretches for 
more than 10,000 -miles southeastward 
from Cape Kennedy to 90 degrees 
east longitude in the Indian Ocean. 
In effect, the range is a network of 
scattered segments. These segments 
include two major mainland sites at 
Cape Kennedy and Patrick AFB, 
Fla,, connected by underwater cable 
to four of seven large off-shore 
instrumentation stations. There are 
also 28 associated smaller sites 
located on the eastern coast of the 
United States; in the Bahama Islands 
and Africa; and in Caribbean, South 
Atlantic and Indian Ocean waters. 
The range also has a fleet of 16 in- 
strumentation and other support ves- 
sels, and a fleet of test support air- 
craft. Collectively, these assets rep- 
resent a capital investment in excess 
of $1.6 billion, which qualifies AFETR 
as the largest test establishment in 
the world. 



Cape Kennedy, officially Cape Ken- 
nedy Air Force Station, is a combina- 
tion launch site, control center and 
instrumentation complex. DOI> and 
NASA test organizations, together 
with their contractors, work in as- 
signed operating facilities in the 
Cape's industrial area. Elsewhere on 
the 2 5- sc|U arc-mile reservation arc all 
the other facilities essential to tost 
support: 19 active launch areas, pro- 
pellant storage, special shops and 
laboratories, fire and rescue centers, a 
deep water port and a 10,000-foot long 
landing strip for the air delivery of 
launch vehicles. With the advent of 
manned space flight, additional spe- 
cial facilities have been added, includ- 
ing a Bioastronautic Operational Sup- 
port Unit (BOSU) in support of a 
launch-site man-recovery system. 

A twofold comparison demonstrates 
the magnitude of the Capo Kennedy 
operation. The Cape's security guard 
activity is about as large as the uni- 
formed police force of a city the 
size of Tampa, Fla. The electrical 
power consumed at the Cape could 
also meet the daily requirements of a 
city that size. 

Patrick AFB, located 15 miles south 
of the Cape, is the headquarters site 
for AFETR and the general staging 
center for support of range operations. 
All AFETR and resident Aerospace 
Rescue and Recovery Service, Air Dc- 




ICBM Row, Air Force Eastern Test Range. 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



fense Command, Military Airlift 
Command and transient aircraft are 
based and maintained there. A huge 
technical laboratory houses the pri- 
mary data reduction equipment and! 
the largest single photo development 
facility cast of Hollywood. Patrick 
also serves as the supply and mainte- 
nance depot for AFETR activities. 
The base has a work force of over 
9,000, in addition to a military de- 
pendent population of about 4,000. 

The major APETR downrange sta- 
tions all perform similar data acqui- 
sition functions, differing 1 in sine only 
because of variations in their instru- 
mentation. The stations are located 
on the islands of Grand Bahama, 
Elnuthera, Grand Turk, Antigua, 
Trinidad and Ascension, antl at Pre- 
toria in South Africa. The range also 
provides communications and logistic 
support of the Air Force Satellite 
Control Facility station at Mahe in 
the Indian Ocean. 

AFETR's ocean-going fleet now 
totals 16, ranging from 17,000-ton 
Advanced Range Instrumentation 
Ships <ARIS), used for complex mia- 
sile reentry tracking, to medium- 
sixed telemetry ships and smaller 
inter-island support craft. Although 
tho range's vessels are deployed 
throughmit the world, their primary 
zones of operation are the Atlantic 
and Indian Oceans. Marine support 
bases for the ships are operated by 
the range at Port Canaveral, adjacent 
to tho cane; Trinidad; Recife, Brasil; 
and Port Louis, on the Indian Ocean 
Island of Mauritius. 

The range has three basic types of 
test support aircraft designed for gen- 
eral purpose instrumentation mis- 
sions. There are 11 JC-130 turboprop 
aircraft for long-range, direct-telem- 
etry reception or pickup from ships, 
and for" ocean search and recovery. 
Five medium-range, propeller-driven 
G-131's perform radio interference 
and general surveillance tasks. Nino 
JC-135 jets for high-speed, long-range 
telemetry missions are currently being 
phased in. Some o these jet aircraft 
will also be equipped with Airborne 
Lightweight Optical Tracking Sys- 
tems (ALOTS) , now undergoing final 
engineering evaluation on the range. 

Technological progress at AFETR 
went through a number of develop- 
ment stages. Initially, the range was 
oriented almost exclusively to cruise 
(aerodynamic) missiles, such as the 
Martin Matador, Northrop Snark and 

(Continued on Page 19} 



15 






Excerpt from address by May. Gen. 
J. W. O'Neill, USAF, Commander, 
Electronic Systems Div., Air Force 
Systems Command, at the Na- 
tional Telemetering Conference, Boa- 
ton, Mass., May 12, 1966. 




Maj. Gen. J. W. O'Neill, USAP 

Thank you for this opportunity to 
discuss the Air Force Systems Com- 
mand's Electronic Systems Division's 
role in telemetry. . . . 

You may be aware that the Na- 
tional Telemetering Conference (NTC) 
was one of the first conferences on 
space communications and telemetry. 
During the pasL 17 years it has contin- 
ued to grow in stature under the joint 
sponsorship of the American Institute 
of Aeronautics and Astronautics 
(AIAA), the Institute of Electrical 
and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), 
and the Instrument Society of Amer- 
ica (ISA). . . . 

To my mind it is logical and most 
proper for the AIAA, IEEE and ISA 
to sponsor the NTC because the in- 
dustries they represent basically de- 
pend upon advanced remote control 
and telemeter tools to achieve prog- 
ress in their respective fields. 

Now let me get to a part of my 
story that is closer to home and tell 
you how the Electronic Systems Divi- 



sion (ESD) got involved. You will re- 
call that the space business is not 
very old. It started with ballistic 
missile development in the mid-1950's 
and very rapidly, thereafter, there 
came into being some rather exten- 
sive ranges such as Cape Canaveral 
in Florida and Point Argucllo in Cali- 
fornia. At each of these ranges, 
space/ground instrumentation sys- 
tems and elements of world tracking 
nets were developed, each of which 
was installed at the behest of indi- 
vidual space projects. With the spec- 
tacular growth of these range head 
stations and their nets, it soon became 
apparent that some overall manage- 
ment would have to be applied to 
them so that across-the-board master 
planning could be accomplished and 
economics made in the total future 
instrumentation configuration. 

The problem was somewhat akin 
to the early period of aviation when 
each airline installed its own radio 
ranges. This got to be so expensive 
that the airlines were glad to pass 
the problem and the costs to ante- 
cedants of the current Federal Avia- 
tion Agency (FAA). Out of the bur- 
geoning growth of the space ranges 
came the concept of the National 
Range Division (NRD) which would 
perform global range planning and 
play a heavy role in standardization 
of space range instrumentation. 

With the Air Force Systems Com- 
mand (AFSC) acting as the DOD 
executive agent for NRD, it soon be- 
came apparent that a central agency 
was needed that would be responsible 
for development of range instrumen- 
tation in response to NRD planning, 

AFSC recognized that range instru- 
mentation development would eventu- 
ally interface quite sharply with ESD 
efforts on global communications and 
world-wide space surveillance and 
tracking efforts. It therefore placed 
the responsibility for future develop- 
ment at ESD. The thinking was that 
range instrumentation systems are 
specialized, ground-based command 



and control systems within the area, 
expertise of ESD. In a broad K& 
the aeronautics and astronautics c! 
ments of the command decided t 
electronics specialists of System Co 
mand should take over this functk 
and that wo did. Having this respc 
sibility is not without its problem 
so some portion of my time is t 
voted to systems development pr< 
lems directly relating to the el 
ironies being installed in m 
stations, space vehicles and on i 
vanced global range aircraft Pic! 
believo me, it makes for some \\ 
interesting system management p: 
lems. 

Our job of supporting Air Fo 
test ranges involves many tasks, 
discuss a few to help you appreci 
the scope of our work. Some of 
recent efforts have included the: 

o Apollo Range Instrumental 
Aircraft (A/ttIA) developed in s 
port of the National Aeronautics 
Space Administration (NASA), ' 
of the chief functions of this airc 1 
will be the reception and recordin] 
information telemetered from 
Apollo Command Module. 

JC-130 Instrumentation Prog 
in support of the AFSC S; 
Systems Division. The program ii 
tended to enhance the aerial 
covery capabilities of JC-130 airc 
through the development of a tc 
etry receive, record and data dis 
capability for them. 

Ue-Entry Systems Evalui 
Radar (RESER) being develops 
use by NRD, to be used in eva 
ing ballistic reentry systems in 
Pacific. 

Coherent Signal Processor! 
developed jointly by NASA/ 
This is a doppler system for apl 
tion to range radars to facilitate 
cise velocity measurements. . 

Digital Range Safety/Com 
Systems being developed for the 



16 



ranges for use in carrying out the 
command destruct function necessary 
* when launching R&D boosters, and 
for other command functions. 

Turning specifically to telemetry, 
I'll review somo of the important 
things we are doing or trying to do. 
I've already mentioned that we are 
doing development work for ranges 
but, over and above this, I think we 
are concerned with two major efforts. 
One of these is standardization of 
telemetry systems; the other is the 
transition of AFSC telemetry services 
from VHF to UHP. 

First, let's consider standardiza- 
tion. Several groups have tackled this 
problem of standardizing telemetry 

systems. 

In 1960 this NTC group formed a 
Telemetering Standards Coordination 
Committee (TSCC), covering all types 
of telemetry applications, to serve aa 
a focal point to receive, coordinate 
and disseminate information, and to 
recommend and endorse standards, 
methods and procedures to users, 
manufacturers and supporting agen- 
cies, 

On the military side, in 1952, the 
range commanders of the Atlantic Mis- 
sile Range, Pacific Missile Range and 
White Sands Missile Range estab- 
lished the Inter-Range Instrumenta- 
tion Group (IRIG) for the inter- 
change of information between the 
ranges on common problems concern- 
ing instrumentation. Since the early 
1950's, IRIG has been issuing 1 stand- 
ards, one of which is aimed primarily 
at the range telemetery systems. 

IRIG's efforts undoubtedly pre- 
vented utter chaos in the past. How- 
ever, though standards were con- 
tinually updated, they tended to lag 
behind actual practice to some ex- 
tent. Further, many range users con- 
tinued to develop unique systems for 
special applications. These conditions 
led Dr. Harold Brown, now Secretary 
of the Air Force, to state in 1962 
that inadequate investigation of 
agency requirements had resulted in 
non-standard systems. He requested 
the Assistant Secretaries of the 
Army, Navy and Air Force to insure 
maximum adherence to IRIG 1-6-60 
standards. Additionally, non-standard 
r telemetery systems were not to be 
placed on ranges without the approval 
of the range commanders. Dr. 
Brown's memorandum recognized that 
standards cannot be written to cover 



every conceivable requirement, and 
that telemetry systems for some pro- 
grams may have to he tailor-made on 
a one-time basis. But, it also called 
for project offices to review and ap- 
prove such systems that involve 
ground equipment. 

The Assistant Secretary of the 
Air Force (R&D) responded to Dr. 
Brown's request by asking AFSC 
". . . to initiate an exercise to list all 
the prime systems, to give the im- 
portant technical characteristics of 
the different telemetry systems, and 
to provide a plan for (a) reducing 
the number of telemetry systems from 
the point of view of their compati- 
bility, and for (b) reduction of devel- 
opment costs and of prime contractor 
engineering efforts." The task was as- 
signed to ESD with technical support 
from the MITRE Corp. 

ESD conducted the study and made 
recommendations that we think are 
a starter in getting an effective telem- 
etry standardization program under 
way. Presently, we are conducting a 
review of all Systems Command In- 
strumentation Development Plans ; 
providing engineering assistance to 
Systems Command divisions and cen- 
ters; providing technical assistance to 
System Program Offices for instru- 
mentation compatibility with the 
ranges; and conducting an inde- 
pendent review of telemetry require- 
ments placed on the ranges. 

Looking to the future, we think 
there is a need for establishing stand- 
ard telemetry test procedures. This 
would involve environmental testing 
and systems testing as well as com- 
ponent testing. 

Now, I'll turn to our second major 
telemetry effort : the transition of 
telemetry operations from VHF to 
UHF. 

As background I think I should 
briefly state the two reasons for the 
transition. One is the interference re- 
sulting from mutual use of VHF by 
the ranges and by the military tac- 
tical organizations. The other reason 
is that the requirements for wide- 
band telemetry necessitated move- 
ment to an area of the spectrum 
where they could be accommodated. 
In February 196B the Military Com- 
munications-Electronics Board di- 
rected the Military Services to shift 
telemetry activities from VHF to 
UHF by Jan. 1, 1970. 

ESD has been given overall AFSC 



responsibility for the coordination of 
this shift. We at ESD consider this 
coordination to be our most significant 
role in future telemetry development. 
This will involve planning the shift, 
coordinating range procurements, de- 
veloping new UHF equipment, and 
establishing a meaningful test pro- 
gram. 

How does this transition affect the 
telemetry industry? Although an ex- 
act amount is difficult to obtain, we 
estimate that DOD, to date, has 
invested about $40 million since initial 
efforts at implementing a UHF capa- 
bility began several years ago. This 
amount includes equipment develop- 
ment and procurement costs. At the 
present time, for example, DOD 
is funding over 70 individual com- 
ponent development efforts in UHF 
transmitters, receivers and antennas. 
Further, we have extensive equip- 
ment purchases each fiscal year. It is 
estimated that future costs will total 
about $70 million distributed over the 
next several years. 

So much for UHF transition. Let 
me conclude with a few observations 
on what I see as future trends in 

telemetry. 

First, it seems clear that the num- 
ber and complexity of spacecraft will 
increase, along with increased mis- 
sion durations and transmission dis- 
tances, This will demand exceptional 
stability and reliability characteris- 
tics in instrumentation, both in the 
vehicle and on the ground to say 
nothing of the requirements for 
handling greater amounts of data. 

Computers will be required during 
the coming decade for increasingly 
greater roles in telemetry operations. 
Several automated telemetry stations 
are already operational. Some of the 
advantages are shorter set-up and 
calibration time, and faster data re- 
duction and presentation. 

The greatly increased transmission 
distance will tend to make lasers more 
attractive for telemetry applications. 

Microminiaturization techniques will 
be essential in space vehicle telemetry 
systems and widely employed in 
ground-based systems as well. 

Finally, I think unified systems, in 
which one system performs the func- 
tions of tracking telemetry and com- 
mand, will predbminate on the ranges 
in the future. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



17 



aitorn Tost Rcingo 

(Continued from Pnyfl IX) 

lofiinK Honmrc. Thone curly ini;i;tilon 
vern followed by tin' Nnrlh American 
lavnho, Kairehild Hull (JmiHo mid 
,'Iartin Mace. Mont of these progranui 
rero te.-iti'd in thn 1 Will's. 

In response to recommendations in 
lio von Neumann Kcport (un aiialytim 
f Air Force misnilo technology), in- 
[n'continmital ballistic missile ( ICHM) 
kivclopmont was accorded the highest 
iiilionnl priority in I!>M, An a ro- 
ult, AFKTIt underwent n period of 
ndicitl, urgent redo,'iign anil augmon- 
ation. Tim ranjv' emphanbi changed 
rom long duration, cruise miiuillo 
overage to a much more accurate 
nijisdory measurement capacity, 

Tliern followed in quick miccoHjilon 
ll entirely now category ol' weapon 
yHtoms- thn Douglan 'I'lior, donvair/ 
ioncral Dynamics A (hut, ('lirynler 
upiter, Martin Tilun mid Lockheed 
'oliiris, Thene were the Unit genera- 
ion ballistic missiles (hat laid I lie 
;rmimlwork for more advanced iniii- 
Hi's, such an Hoeing Miiuiteinnn nnd 
mprovod modoln nf '1'ltan nnd Po< 
lirin, and fntnre space <'|l'ort:i, 

Several factor;) iilniid out in Hie 
onran of AFKTU'ii growth In lu-op 
men with the exploding technology 
lull has charncteri/i'd larne^inile 
i!Htiii(v in tlui Imit. deeiidc. There Intii 
con doimtmit premiure for iniproveil 
iiHtruimuitation arnirnry, co venire 
ml nipndlty, lUivlHipm! nmiptilent 
or luuidiiiiK ci'inplcx mmm I'qiialiniin 
ro munilatory. MophinUcal'-d cnin- 
ninicntioiu! e<|iiipinent in now I'oin- 
ionpliu'{>. 

Data itc(|iiinition nynlenin advanced 
rom niodin.-d World War II radara 
3 lotiK-i-atiKC, idnpoint, in-euratc 
qnijmiont. In fact, keen i-oni)iidition 
iiHuod h^twci'n the men whit drvel- 
Pftd Urn j-ncUidti and thnne wlin niadn 
mind mippnrt el<>nn>nl::. ].\n- exmnple, 
i tlin hilt! l!)fil)'H Ccneral Klerlric 1 !! 
led Til inhmtln Kuidani-e nyutem 
liowwl an order of iici-uracy Imyond 
nylhlujf avaihdilf. t,, meiuuire it. Thin 
K! lh company'H irurhhiK oqmpmenL 
iiKiniHirw to flomn up with Un* Prc- 
ifion MiHHil.. Trajectory Mentiuri'- 
wnt (MISTHAM) nyHlem, 

it, tli^ BcniTh Titr now 
wiuipment, <iciu>nil Dyiinmit-B 
thn AXUHA ititd (JI.OTUAC 
oiitlnuouH wavo trnckliiK HywUtin. Tin* 
ladio Covpornlinn of Amrlpn firo- 
uecd tlio MiHHilf. I'rt'clHlon Inntru- 



iinintaUon Radar (MTPTt) family of 
lixed and Lraimportalilc! radars capa- 
bln of loniLiiij'- Hpacn ohjnctH within 
.Ofi miles in aximuth/ohwation and 
to within HI) fi-i'l in rnn^. Hiweral 
new, lar|.vo tHenwtry dinh anttiiinsiH 
nppi'arinjv on the ranj-'e an-. ]troto- 
typt'n in their chiiis. Radiation, Inc. isi 
a pioneer ('(tntrihutor to juich devnlop- 
nmnlH. Th<! mw 'PoliMnotry Ountral 
(TKIj IV) tracking system, now biiinK 
conipleti-d on Uit! ranivo, incorporateH 
the ell'ortu nf Defense Kh'otronicH, 
Monilor Hyiilimm, 'IVIernntrics HocU- 
nian Kynttinnt, Kh^tro-Meelianical Ite- 
Mearch and (Jeneral Dynamics. At 
downraiiKe jitalioiiM, Space Oeneral 
luiii provided ninny of (\w recently in- 
itialled lelt'iniil.ry rei'i-ivers. 

To meet tint i\rw>. in ballistic, inin- 
"ile teiilintv and the need for hifvh 
reiiolution, loiij';--ranjve o|)|ieal track- 
iiiH' devieen, Parkin Klmer and J. W. 
1'Vcln-r developed the Ui-ctmlltifv Op- 
linil Traclcinjv Inntriinienl (UOT1) 
nnd lnlerce|it (iround Optical Uo- 
eordi-r {!(!<) It), reiipitrtively. Uiulr 
ideal opi-nitinj',' conditionii, Lhctwi in- 
iilniiiienl.li i-an pholojcraph an object 
tin 1 id/I- of a baseball 100 milen away. 
To n;ie n more j(raphic ilhnttnitioii, 
under (he name condiliomi either in- 
lilnniH'iit would permit an umpire in 
Philadelphia to call luilln and Hlrikes 
in New York ('ity'si Yanlcee Slndinm. 

Krnni iln earliest days, A'l'M'JTlt hati 
had an intennc and I'ontinuinjv ve- 
ijuiri'inenl for a hiifh performance, 
data reduction capability. Thin rt!- 
(|uircment wan met only after the de- 
velopment of advanced data procewi- 
iiiK ei|iiipment liy micli Induntrial con- 
cerns an Inlernationiil Hmihiesn Ma- 
chine!: and (lonti'ot Mala Corp. 

Thu dcvelnjHnent of .spacecraft fol- 
lowed naturally and douely on tlm 
lieehi of the aceeleraled ballhilic. HIJH- 
idle programs, In OclobiT 1957, tlic, 
launch of the Soviet Union'n K|iutnik 
I nult'ly [ihnok the nnlioim ti'chnoloKi- 
cal coniplacenry, Thn U.S. [satellite, <if- 
foi't wast Mill in the a.'ittembly and 
checkout !ilK' l H t (Jape Kfuinedy. The 
Unit iuu'cc:i!iful American statelliln did 
mil K'> inl'i nvbit. until January lOftH. 

From Ihiii iinmmvhat inKli'J<H'H bo- 
hav(> evolved thtt incntaHinfcly 
and HO phi tit Seated acliinvo- 
menlH that linvo bciiome HyiiotiymoiiH 
with (!apo Kennedy. Plowtnr, Kx- 
plorer, lIJUiKd' and Mariner bccnnio 
finnouH Hpacecraft liiinicn. In launch 
vehicles, thn nainoH wnr Thor-Udlta, 
AUiiH-AK''ii, AtliiH-Gnntaur, Hatuvn 
and Titan, to name a fnw. 



Tbn nation's manned space flights 
pot under way in Ii)(il with tlio Ued- 
H to iid -Mercury launches. Manned 
Atla.s-Merairy and Titan-CJomini 
lauticboH .followed. TheHO are to bo 
followed by the Saturn I-Apollo <!iirth 
orhital and Saturn V-Apotlo lunar ex- 
ploration flights. 

It IK not always evident that thn 
success of Oap<! Kennedy'H miHsilti and 
.space missions depends on intricate., 
highly inte.tf rated ground support. 
Thin in thn void APMTTl ia curr(>ntly 
most heavily eim'H' l 'd in. This rolo 
will hecomi! iwon more pronouiuM^d in 
t\w future. 

In the uncurtain art of forecasting, 
several facts and considerations bonv- 
ing upon AI'M'lTU's future stand out. 
Eastward launcbnH assure thn great- 
est pnyload-to-booHter thrust ratios 
and orbital coverage of tlio most 
heavily populated latitudes of thn 
thn earth's surface. Capn Kennedy in 
ideally situated (within six decrees 
of the ecliptic plain;) for lunar/inter- 
planetary launches. The eapn in tho 
nation's most convnninntly loaitnd 
launch situ for equatorial or syn- 
chronous orhits. 

In this context, thn Air Forcn Kast- 
ern Test UanK<'' K'' ( ''^nst Inj^acy to 
the nation's space objectivns is prob- 
ably in tho arna of things an yet unin- 
vmited and placid as yet unexplored. 
Whatever tho future, much of thn 
foundation, tradition and I'xiuUntf na- 
tional talent in tho realm of "rangn 
art" had its beginning at (lapo Ken- 
nedy. 



Aeronautical 

Planning Seminar 

Proceedings Available 

Copies of the proccediiiKH of _ thn 
Air Force-Industry Planning Smninar 
on AoronauUdiil SyHtt^mn, hold at 



Wi-iicht-riillormiii AFIl, Ohio, March 
H.'t-SJfi, 1905. are now available to in- 
tnreste,d iiulusti'iul organisations. 



tint document in 
tho promidingH will b 
availabln only to industrial concerns 
with proper ticcurity clearance and 
nood-to-kmnv. 



should be forwarded 
through this appropriate I Won HO (Ion- 
tract Administration Services Kogion 
to tho Diifmimi Documentation Oontor, 
Camornn .Station, Alnxandria, Va. 
22H14. Th(! documont Is identified by 
DDCNo. H78110. 



Total Package 
Procurement Concept 

(Continued from Page 12) 

deficiencies, ensures that we will not 
be looking over your shoulder and 
"helping you" engineer and produce 
as much as we have in the past. But 
the nature and degree of disengage- 
ment still requires case-by-case deter- 
mination and we intend periodically to 
review progress in this regard on the 
C-5. 

A few quick words on the Systems 
Project Office (SPO) manning. Since 
the C-5 TPC competition, there has 
been considerable discussion on this 
subject. We in the Air Force are 
impressed with the need for compre- 
hensive manning of our program of- 
fices at the outset of the program- 
before we write the RFP. Adequate 
manning is an urgent requirement 
under today's environment-where 
the RFP, GDP and the contract fix 
the parameters of the program in 
considerable detail. The SPO can no 
longer "grow with the program. 
There is good reason to believe that 
the maximum number of people are 
needed at the outset with some ta- 
pering off downstream. A major re- 
view of our SPO manning precepts is 
indicated. 

Finally what is the future of the 
TPC? 

The already demonstrated benefits 
of applying TPPC to the C-5A 
program have been enough to en- 
gender considerable interest in the 
concept. Identification of and prepa- 
ration for total package contracting 
in the Air Force Short Range Attack 
Missile (SRAM) and the Navy Fast 
Deployment Logistics (FDL) pro- 
grams attest to this fact. The Direc- 
tor of Defense Research and Engi- 
neering has asked the Air Force for 
a comprehensive analysis of its C-BA 
procurement experience to be distrib- 
uted through his office to all secretar- 
ial levels in the Office of the 
Secretary of Defense. The Assistant 
Secretary of Defense (Installations 
and Logistics) has asked the Air Force 



our defense posture and its relation- 
ship to conditions in a constantly 
changing world. Other variables de- 
pend primarily on the selection tech- 
niques used to identify those systems 
S should be acquired to fulfill those 

requirements. Within these con- 
straints, the extent to which the con- 
cept might be applied is a funcUon 

of the benefits to be achieved weighed 
against the disadvantages to be en- 
dured on the basis of a case-by-case 
analysis of the procurement involved. 
In view of TPC's overwhelming 
success to date in the C-5A program, 
maximum efforts are rightfully being 
made to eliminate, insofar as is pos- 
sible, the problems that I have dis- 
cussed here and many, many more. 



mentation through the Armed Serv- 
ices Procurement Regulation. 

How wide an application the con- 
cept will have within DOD is a func- 
tion of many variables, some of which 
pertain to the basic requirements of 

20 



In summary, a review of our expe- 
rience with TPC thus far reveals 
that: 

9 Data has increased substantially 
due to GDP, TPC and Air Force Sys- 
tems Command Manual (AFSCM) 
375-5. 

The multiplicity of new concepts, 
changes and clarifications created 
major problems in competitive envi- 
ronment. 

The extent of detail data submit- 
tal was excessive due to newness of 
concept and over-reaction of contrac- 
tors. 

Some redundancy in data submit- 
tals has occurred. 

Systems engineering (AFSCM 
375-5) is conceptually compatible with 
TPC but requires considerable refine- 
ment. 

Configuration management (AF 
SCM 375-1) is compatible with TPC 
with minor refinement. 

Data management (AFSCM 310- 
1) is compatible with TPC. However, 
much more discipline is needed. 

Source selection process can be 
simplified. Some progress has been 
made, but much more is considered 
possible. 

The basic purpose of the TPC was 
achieved in the C-5A, 

The TPC contracting technique 
will continue to be studied with the 
objective of deriving more benefits. 
The success of this will largely depend 
upon the diligence and the vision of 
both industry and the Air Force in 
applying this concept to future pro- 
grams. 



Price Increase for 

Quinine and Quinidine 

Subject of Senate Hearing 

The price increase for quinine and 
quinidine was the subject of hearings 
conducted on May IS, 19G6, by t-e 
Senate Antitrust and Monopoly Sub- 
committee of the Committee of the 
Judiciary. Shirley C. Fisk, M. D, 
Deputy Assistant Secretary of De- 
fense for Health and Medical, \vas 
the principal witness for the Defense 
Department. 

The purpose of the hearings was 
to ascertain the cause of the price 
increase which, for both drugs, was 
eight to tenfold. Since the source of 
both quinine and quinidine is con- 
trolled primarily by European proc- 
essors, the subcommittee investigated \ 
the possibility of collusion or price 
fixing following announcement by 
DOD of significant requirements for 
quinine in 1964. 

Detailed information was provided 
to the subcommittee by DOD on re- 
quirements and methods followed in 
attempting to purchase the drugs an 
the principal suppliers in the United 
States. Testimony was given on DOD 
knowledge of the market and supply, 
At the conclusion of the hearings, 
the subcommittee requested the De- 
partment of Justice to investigate the 
possibility of price fixing by Euro- 
pean firms in providing, quinine and , 
quinidine to importers in this conn- 

fcl ^Total DOD requirements for qui- 
nine have been obtained by release 
?Z the National Stockpile No qui- 
nine has been pure Iwaed fm ej 
mercial sources for seveial ye , 
Some of DOD requirements tor P 
nidine have been provide* 1 *m -to 
pile quinine in order to relieve pre 
sure on the civilian market Ito 
method of procurement will be cm- 
inued until the supply and p 
situation becomes st abilrzed. it 
stockpile assets are adequ ate tojg 
DOD demands for the foreseauw 
future. 



Control Pages 
of Classified Documents 

A frequently posed question by re 
cipients of classified docume^ 
"How should accountability be e 
lished for individual pages : rtr 
from formal documents? ThwP 
lem develops wheneve a df" 

document is tt np^! z ;* KtS o 
from it are used in the piepamw 
another classified ^cument { 

A recommended procedui * 
establish a aubcontrol station .tojj 
tain individual pages and JJ* tf 
records ns well .as a listing o 
pages and de ^iptive data J 
tain control, use a c alge fw ! 
system which provides sp ace J 
dicating the ultimate disposu . 
each page, ; 

August W 



ltt Now Look of Our 
Co 

*>espondence School 

(Continued from Page 3) 
I> t1 development effort, the Corre- 
f'ondence School is ever alert to op- 
*i't\inlties to add to the freshness 
iE" or of student instruction. In 
xesponding; to the heightened 
asis on management in the Resi- 
Course, the Textbook Develop- 
Group produced a new founda- 
text, "Management: Concepts 
practice." The group contributed 
the development of a Resident 
anthology on counterinsur- 
and, in turn, adapted it to cor- 
1>0 spondence instruction by publica- 
tion of a text titled "New Dimensions 
^ the Cold War: Transition and Ten- 
in the Underdeveloped World." 
Similarly, paralleling the current 
on scientific decision mak- 
in the resident curriculum, the 
osponclonce School will soon pub- 
lish a text on "The Department of 
Defense Planning-Programming-Bud- 
ETeting: System," This text embodies 
the thinking of the three principal 
of the contemporary ap- 
to decision making: Secretary 
of Defense Robert S. McNamara; 
Charles J. Hitch, former Assistant 
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) ; 
and Dr. Alain C. Enthoven, Assistant 
Secretary of Defense (Systems Analy- 
sis), The student will thus gain a 
deeper insight into Mr. McNamara's 
quest for options and his emphasis 
on analyses of cost and effectiveness 
in deciding on the best allocation of 
resources for Defense programs. 

The so-called "systems analysis" 
approach in the Pentagon, it will be 
made clear, strikes deep in the past; 
it represents extension of techniques 
of economic analysis long used in in- 
dustry and of the systematic disci- 
pline employed in military operations 
research since World War II. The 
student will find in this text not a 
detailed account of techniques and 
methodologies, but an elucidation of 
the broader aspects of this emerging 
discipline its essential characteris- 
tics, its applications, its strengths 
andr iTideed, its limitations in top- 
level decision making. Computers and 
operations research techniques, the 
student will learn, can never replace 
valu e judgments, but they can help 
k to provide the factual and analytical 
basis for informed and reflective 
t. A study of this text will 
out what is at the heart of 
McNamara's approach his in- 



sistence on the application of greater 
objectivity, logic and explicit analysis 
of the issues and alternatives in con- 
sidering the best Defense policy to 
attain national security objectives. 

Forward Planning. 

By mid-1965, the Correspondence 
School had reached a full cycle of 
textbook development and revision. 
Though its texts were then on a solid 
footing;, the school embarked on a new 
program marking a substantial ad- 
justment of its curriculum to reflect 
a number of changes fundamental in 
the Resident Course. The changeover, 
scheduled over a three-year period, 
will see the phaseout and replacement 
of 10 of the 22 texts currently in use. 
It poses a formidable challenge in 
developing the new texts as well as 
in realigning, adapting and updating 
existing texts. 

As fully developed by mid-1968, the 
new National Security Management 
course will closely parallel the current 
structure and content of the Resident 
Course, Along with a tightening and 
updating of existing texts, several 
gap-areas will be filled. Science and 
technology, for example, will be 
treated as a basic national resource., 
and D ef ense research and develop- 
ment will receive separate and com- 
prehensive coverage. A full text will 
be devoted to Defense organization 
and management, highlighting- tho 
road to unification, the progressive 
centralization of authority in the Sec- 
retary of Defense, the strengthening 
of tho Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the 
creating of other agencies and instru- 
ments to support and assist the Secre- 
tary in managing the many varied. 
and far-fiung 1 activities of the De- 
fense Establishment. As indicated, one 
such inatrumen t, the Dep artment 
of Defense Planning- Programmmg- 
Budgeting System, will be given spe- 
cial emphasis in another full text, aa 
part of the college's continuing effort 
to enhance the development of mili- 
tary and civilian officials who are bet- 
ter informed and better equipped to 
meet present and future challenges to 
our national security, 

While seven of tho 22 texts in the 
now series -will bo devoted specifically 
to Defense logistics management, due 
account will be taken of the total "bal- 
ance sheet" of our national strength 
and liabilities. The series will con- 
tinue to stress the interwoven rela- 
tionships of our managerial, scientific, 
industrial, economic and social insti- 



tutions, and the management prob- 
lems and challenges in marshalling 
these institutions in support of na- 
tional policy. Appropriate attention 
will be given to the planning for 
peace as well as for war maintain- 
ing high levels of economic growth 
and stability ; effecting the proper 
distribution of basic goods and serv- 
ices; raising living- standards, na- 
tional health, education and science 
programs; working with our allies in 
the pursuit of peace and security; 
and assisting the emerging nations of 
the world in their struggle for ma- 
turity and independence. At the same 
time, the student will be impressed 
with the fact that in today's shrunken 
world, with no clear lines discernible 
between peace and war, it is all tho 
more important that our total re- 
sources and managerial talent bo 
readily adaptable to changing con- 
ditions. He will see how the Govern- 
ment, in concert with industry, labor, 
the professions and the public, seeks 
to ensure orderly plannin g for the 
prompt and effective redirection of 
the economy to emergency needs. 

An Opportunity for Self -Development. 

Our Correspondence Course is not 
designed to train specialists, but spe- 
cialists and generalists alike will 
profit immeasurably from close, disci- 
plined study of the 22 bluebooks com- 
prising the course. These are not 
broad-brush presentations, and the 
course is not a "snap," It generally 
takes 12 to 16 months of diligent ap- 
plication to complete this course. A 
comprehensive evaluation examination 
is administered on each unit to meas- 
ure learning achievement. 

Only energetic students can hope 
to complete the course successfully. 
Only 50 percent do, and some 71 per- 
cent of all graduates hold at least a 
bachelor's degree. The course is open 
to select clientele: military officers of 
all components of the Department of 
Defense and the Coast Guard serving 
in active or inactive status in the 
grade of major or lieutenant com- 
mander and above, civilian executives, 
members of the several professions, 
Federal employees with ratings 
of GS-11 and above, and certain 
military and federally employed na- 
tionals of friendly foreign countries, 

Reserve officers not on extended ac- 
tive duty may earn a total of 48 credit 
points for retention and retirement 
purposes. Satisfactory completion re- 
ports on military personnel and Fed- 



Industry Bulletin 



21 




s Defense Industrial Plant Equip- 
Center (DIPEC) at Memphis, 
- is a vital source of assistance 
Q'Vernment agencies and defense 
Actors in meeting military cont- 
ents, especially in times of emer- 



its establishment in 1963, 
lias continued to supply con- 
with vitally needed items of 
'trial plant equipment (IPE) 
^ could not be purchased by in- 
'V in sufficient time or quantities 
Get production requirements. The 
t\t. Southeast Asia buildup is an 
of how this type of help can 
advantageously. 
center was established to 
greater economy through re- 
ibution of idle equipment. It is 
insible for assuring that one 
* component does not procure a 
item while another component 
a similar item not being used. 
DIPEC is under mandatory 
to service DOD com- 
nts, it also provides certain 
p m ent by agreement to other 
jrmnent agencies, such as the Na- 
il Aeronautics and Space Admin- 
.tloTi and the Atomic Energy 
mission, 

b its Memphis headquarters, 
EG holds either technical or op- 
ional control over six equipment 
ajt^e and rep air/ rebuild sites from 
th equipment is shipped to users. 
[!*EG now maintains records on a 
I inventory of some 881,000 items 
jquipment valued at about $3.5 
3Tt . This inventory encompasses 
is of metalworking, electrlcal- 
tronic, test and general purpose 
str-ial plant equipment used in the 
a-rch, building, testing and main- 
ing" of weapon systems and other 
rise materials. 

Tidei- a Defense Supply Agency In- 
,rial Equipment Reserve (DSAIER) 
ri-eiTn, DIPEC manages an inclus- 
[ plant equipment package reserve 
3 li consists of machine tools and 
if items necessary to the produc- 
of a military end item not im- 
available on the market. 
packages are designed for pro- 
items common to the Services, 
as landing mats, concertina wire, 
Helmets and liners, mess gear 



and kitchen equipment, tents and 
other basic equipment. Packages pres- 
ently in reserve are valued in excess 
of $5 million, with another $8 mil- 
lion worth now being brought into the 
program as a result of transfer of 
management responsibility from the 
Army to the Defense Supply Agency. 

Since becoming fully operational, 
DIPEC has shown its ability to sup- 
port its customers through efficient 
reutilization of its assets. It is now 
screening an average of 3,150 requi- 
sitions a month against its idle in- 
ventory. 

In FY 1965, DIPEC effected reuti- 
lization of more than 18,000 items of 
equipment valued at more than $101 
million. Through the first eight 
months of FY 1966 redistribution of 
idle equipment amounted to $102 mil- 
lion, 

DIPEC'a contributions toward the 
economy and the military effort have 
been noteworthy. Some examples of 
savings to the Government are: 

Four 1,000-ton mechanical presses 
were furnished the Army's Ammuni- 
tion Procurement and Supply Agency, 
Joliet, 111. The acquisition cost of 
these items totalled more than $500,- 
000. 

Three 1,600-ton mechanical presses 
for use on the Bomb Demolition M- 
117 program, with a total acquisition 
cost of $566,660, were also provided 
for the Army. 

An impact hammer with an ac- 
quisition cost of $165,090 was shipped 
to the Bell Helicopter Co. in Fort 
Worth, Tex., for use on the Army's 
UH-1 helicopter production program. 

A milling machine, which orig- 
inally cost the government $107,712, 
was supplied to the Martin-Marietta 
Co. of Baltimore, Md., for use on an 
Air Force production program. 

A boring and turning machine, 
declared idle at the General Electric 
Co. at Burlington, Vt.j was moved to 
the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard to 
replace an older machine. Acquisition 
price of the idle machine was 
$126,025. 

In the midst of these achievements, 
DIPEC continued the difficult and 
time-consuming task of developing 
standards for describing industrial 
plant equipment. Commonly under- 



stood terms permit the cross-servicing 1 
of equipment (which hitherto was 
often blocked by terminology familiar 
enough to one agency but obscure to 
another) and provide for a more effi- 
cient utilization of electronic data 
processing. 

DIPEC has also been involved in 
developing a subclassifieation coding 
system within the Federal Supply 
Classification (FSC), known as PEC's, 
or Plant Equipment Codes. The PEC's 
not only embody the FSC but identify 
type, size, capacity and other charac- 
teristics of the item. 

DIPEC develops, publishes and 
maintains IPE handbooks that nidwlo 
the production equipment code cross- 
referenced with nomenclature, the 
nomenclature cross-referenced to the 
PEC, item description by manufac- 
turer, and guides for preparing de- 
scription of IPE. 

Publication of all handbooks cover- 
ing the entire DIPEC scope of SB 
FSC's is scheduled for completion by 
November 19GO. Those will provide 
more than 100,000 individual identi- 
fications by manufacturer's part/ 
model number and will specifically 
identify items of in-use and idle IPB 
to bo reported to DIPEG 01* to bo 
screened by DIPEC prior to procure- 
ment. 

These will greatly facilitate man- 
agement of IPE throughout the DOD. 
As a part of its responsibility to 
maintain a balanced reserve of IPK, 
DIPEC manages the National Indus- 
trial Equipment Ucsorvo (NIER) pro- 
gram under Public Law 8RS. Tliln pro- 
vides for a national reserve which may 
be loaned, leased, or transferred to 
other Government agencies, non-profit 
educational institutions, or training 
schools, and may bo used by private 
industry in the event of emergency. 
In recent years, considerable empha- 
sis has been given to loaning NIER 
equipment to vocational training 
schools. 

The 6rat loan of NIER equipment 
to a school was authorised in late 
1958 and since that time interest in 
the program has grown to consider- 
able proportions. Requests have been 
received from almost every state, in- 
cluding Hawaii. Through Dec. 31, 
1965, there were 141 loans to schools 
and two to Job Corps camps. These 
loans covered 3,01Y items of equip- 
ment valued at about $16,374,000. 

Approval of these loams does not 
affect the DOD surplus property pro- 



Industry Bulletin 



23 



f?ram under which educntional imiti- 

tutioiiH and training ncboitln may ac- 
quire HurpliiH tooln a they become 
avail able. 

Some of the moro far-reachinK 
benefits expected to accrue from thin 
fneet of the NIKH program are: 

A reiiorve of skilled labor of un- 
limited value in tho event of mobili- 
xtition. 

Thy retention of a vcnerve of 
("Jove.rnmc.nt-owm!(i machinei'y on a 
disportied basin. 

o A Hnvimv to the (lovernnii'iit of 
noinfi 1 , ntoraj;e and imiinlenaiii'i! 
of the loaned 



Federal ajtcnciiui honelHiiiK 
from DIl'KC'H program Iti Hits U,,4. 
Treamiry Department. A total of HI 
IteniH valued lit more than $:il!.0im 
has been made available to aunlut In 
rolitivintf tho coin nhorlaw. DOP- 
owned pri!HMi!H on loan to ll.K. Mintu 
provided the mldiliounl capacity to In- 
mmwi FY fi production to oiKht bil- 
lion coinn. Tho total KY M production 
wan '!.!! billion. 

Through an agreement between tho 
Dofenm! Supply Affimcy and tin* Fed- 
oral Aviation Affncy (FA A), FA A 
nmtractoni are nlitaiuiiiK loauii uf idle 
DOD industrial plant equipment for 
nun on tint Suporminic Trannport 
(KHT) Development I'i'OKrain. Al- 
though Um Ihial KMT contract will not 
lio awarded until Ihn'oinhi'i 1 1011(1, KAA 
in authorl/lng two nirfrnnui and t\vt 
unh'ino contractoni to ncronn (,ho 
DIPKC idlo ntHorvi! for i'(|uipnieiit In 
aid in improving ddtiiini and for 
full-iicalo modclii of thu KST. 



Weapon!', IHl'KO n'turm'd tin- 
nun. to nrlivc iini' t< iin-n-ani 
tion of alivrafl onmim 1 " l 
Connt'cticiit pliinl. 

In a vari.'ly of wnyti, IUPKC in 
tinuiiu; to aid Hit' imllori'u tli-f 
I'tl'ort and Have the tuspity*'! 1 '" n 
by ilii i-lllrli'iit n'titili/aU.m nf fi 
incut, In uddilinu, It in proviilinK 
buildup ol' n-ncrvo of iiklllrd p 
ml throuKh it:i loan of i-qulpm 
viicHtinnal tralnioK m-hnoln, 



niifl contractors nlno art! Having 
for the (lovttrnineiit l>y utiinx 
hll(i I I'M. A MiiHiiacluKiittht (Inn lu'cdi-tl 
two Ki'indlnK inachincii for umi on 
military (m^imi prodni'titni proifnimH. 
DllM'X! iniulo tlut inaidiincn nvailiihlo 
from itH Torn; llautt!, Iml., HtornKO 
facility. 

In tuiollior caiui, u Now York com- 
pany ri((|uiri'il an aH-wethr clnun- 
lnr aw purt of a vihration lonl facility 
calUsd for in Uut nniniifcturiti''H con- 
tract. DHM'X! diriteUid uMpnit'iil of tins 
which wan in proccmi of 
iilac.cd in idle him UK*', lluiii 
the (lovornnmiU at loiwl $111 W t - 
fi!SO. 

A furnace, rcquinid by u contractor 
at Hartford, Conn., had boon declare tl 
idle and mai'ltod by D1PKC for Rlilp- 
mcnt to ono of its Btorno wiUsB. In 
cooperation with tho Bureau of Naval 



|ni|i 



I" 



:IH 



proilui-tlon MI nn \nmally rosuU in 
|n\vrr unit contii, an uhown below; 

FV I'.llil 

NumliiT "f Ai'lioii!) iju 

Vain.' of A.-llniiu $i>:(0 million 

Siivini'.ji ?7 million 

Hut" nf Nuvlnjin Il.iJ percent 



Coit Rccludlon H op or I 

(Cnntimifil /mm l'!i> '} 
Hhlfllnn fr ..... <'ol-l'lim-!'lM'(l-l'n' 

(Cl'l' 1 ! 1 ') lo Flxcil-I'rla' rimlraclii. Tli" 

Oral t'-n inoulhii of I-'Y IIHUI nlinw n 

conllnuiti)', 1 ilirlliM- in lln 

of CI'FK lypi 1 rnntriu' 

rrnchitlK a rale "f H.ll p 

imn-il wllh Ih" pi-alt nf 

nviiriird in Maivli ll'iH, 

Cl'FF cnnlnidn, whlli- br-inn ih 

fiinli'jil. lo luvnnl liri' tin- mustf .UHlvult 
In niliiilnluli'V, anil inm 1 !' itii|iniIniM ( 
proviihr Hltli- or nit Iwvntivft fur Hi" 
I'liiltraelor lo hold i-nnln down ur nir.'t 
pi'i-forinane" uml dclivi-iy ii|in'htn\- 
llmin. Ui'Citlliii' lllt-y do pt'nnit v;..r!i 
to KC I niuli-r way rapidly niul ni" jmr 
lirularly nuili-d to Mitlily timviiitln 
iiiUiatluiin, \v" liavo tisul lo u><." rt'l-'F 
I'onlnu'hi in tin' I'tiisi' of u 
Vii'tnaiu i'1-lati'il projrclii, fin' 
Hit- I'oUMlnirUoii of U, :i, mlliliny fn 
cllillen in Ihat cminlry, M"iiplt" Ibfin- 
uninniul reiiuiri'mt'iifM, \v" were uM" 

In iilliiW fllllhi'l' proKI"!i;i ill l''V llMIti, 

Sine" nn I. In* uvi-rair" al Irusst t'-n 
ecnl!i in iiavisl on I'lirh dollnr sihlfh'd 
from tM'I-'l 1 ' (n iioiii" ollii'i' finiii of 
contract, I bin nit'uim nn iMitiniitt.'tl mtv- 
liiK of $1184 million. AKitin, lli> nclutit 
retinlln of tho liml Uvo iiionthn may 
incrt-niie (In* dl'Fl 1 ' nit" iionu'whut, 
but wr Hhnuld ulill In* abli* to twltcr 
Hit* n'l !i( 't for the year. 

An the proportion (f ('IM-'l' 1 con- 
tnictn huti di't'lined, (hat, of lino, 
flxcd'priro contractH luui linen, and ly 
virtually tho mum- amount. Thin IK 
enpecially ^I'atifvlni? limimiHi nsi nn- 
der inoiit romlitioim, the Hrni, HM-il- 
prlce cnnlrurt In preferable-, willi tin* 
coiitrarlm* UHtnimiiiK full nmt 
nlblllly and KUitruntc 
mid timely tloltvcry, 

Multl-yonr I'racurcmcnl, MuHi-yenr 
competitive* contract ciialtlt> liidi!( ( rH 
to offer ibo Ciovernment lower prin-s 
Hiuco tho larger qunnUllpti nitd longer 



t'V iiior. 

i- of A.-tiomi ll',i) 



?HR4 million 
?fii) lilillioii 



1'V Ittflll 

'v nf .Vtiomi I IK) 

nf Arii.inti JHW) million 

u PI million 

f SavliiM'i H.' 



Sl'MMAKY 

Wlili n iTCiU'd of live years ol 
iirbli-v>>mi<Mt li"bind UM, tliero Khould 
In- nn (iiii'tittnu tin to tli" value of the 
li.'fVii.ii' Itopjirlmriir.-i I 'imt Hnluction 
I'lMfTiuiti. Nni only ban It jiroducd 
v<-iy 'lUb-iluntltt! dftvliutii hut also It 
bitn iildMllti'itiitly Imprnvt'd UlO m.U\\ 
olllflt'iicy nf Mtir li(fhillcti nyitlom, ni 
.viilmri'il 1-v IM nldllly l imiiport 
l> ..... niily I he fiiiitdi'ii inrr.'iuio ill work' 
|,,;, a iiHi.i. ..I by Hi" conlliia lii Viol- 
num. Mis vvn-Kfi IIH" Scillltltr Un^ltt, 
('hiiirmnn <if the Subcom- 
UM l-'fiti-rul I'nicurcninwt 
|ii' K nlnM.'u ! >inmi'-(l ii|> tin- (!( 
l.-.i'ti ttiiniiul r.-vli-w nf nii 
li.nt 1'n.Hiiuii with thi' foll(t\villR 
lui'iit : 

", . . rtinl n'dnrlloini of floversl 
blllfoiiH of itollant anuiinlly haw 
tin'it ni-lilevfil by iitloitthiK, 
nlliiTH, nmny of Hit' iiUHK^ 
(hlti HubrominUtt't'. In (he 

. , toe* have iM'cn trod !"' 
xni Hon'd, null hoMUUy cilCOllli- 
t.-rod which i inevllfihlo. 

"KtroiN muy have hecn commit- 
d'd mid i-fi-irtlnly much rcilnl 
he dim.- in rnniiiK mint.' fnl nnd 
* . . . Iml I uruo everyone to 

our HiiKKillon n!ul rtcol j' 
nHint the back- 
of HIP woiH'of ihclobBnd 
Um unprt'frdcnlod *omptlh. 



, . , (he Kri'iilly Improved 
lure , . * nor . . . riOnx our efforte 
(award further pronoun." 
It IM my InlfiiUon to ensure tt 
there Is ltd rcliixdllon of effort t 
(hut furllM'r proftrt-MH In nchiovcd 
lh* year iilit'itd. 



24 



Competitive Procurement 
of Ocean Freight Service Announced 



The Defense Department has initi- 
ted the first step m a new system of 
ompetitive bidding from the mari- 
ime industry for moving military 
argoes on regularly scheduled com- 
mercial ships. 

On June 16, 1966, the Commander 
if the Military Sea Transportation 
Service (MSTS) requested competi- 
ive proposals from the maritime m- 
lustry on shipping rates for the 
ransportation of military cargoes be- 
,ween Atlantic, Gulf and Great 
.sites ports of the United States and 
jorts in the United Kingdom and 
lorthern Europe. The deadline estab- 
ished for receipt of proposals was 
fuly 20. Awards will be made within 
,hree weeks of that date. The effec- 
,ive date for shipping military car- 
joes under the new system for the 
tforth Atlantic is August 31. 

The Federal Maritime Commission 
(PMC) held hearings, now completed, 
m tariffs and rates for military goods 
moved iti ships belonging to shipping 
inferences and in ships not belong- 
ing to such conferences. Mr. Robert 
C. Moot, Deputy Assistant Secretary 
af Defense (Logistics Ser/vices), in 
testimony before the FMC on April 
4, 1966, stated that DOD planned to 
institute a system of competitive rate 
bidding for sealifting military car- 
goes. Mr. Moot testified that DOD, 



through the Navy's Military Sea 
Transportation Service, would no 
longer purchase shipping space on the 
basis of prices negotiated through 
shipping conferences or associations. 
The latter procedure had been fol- 
lowed by MSTS since 1950. 

The Defense Department plans 
for all trans-oceanic shipping trade 
routes handling military cargoes to be 
on a competitive basis within the 
next nine months. The following is 
the program for each trade route with 
the dates that MSTS will issue Re- 
quests for Proposals and the effective 
dates for the new system in each 
case: 

North Atlantic: June 16, 1966 

Effective date: Aug. 31, 1966. 
Far East: Aug. 1, 1966 

Effective date: Sept. 30, 1966. 
Mediterranean: Sept. 1, 1966 

Effective date: Oct. 31, 1966, 
Inter-port trades: Nov. 1, 1966 

Effective date: Dec. 30, 1966. 
Caribbean: Oct. 1, 1966 

Effective date: Nov. 30, 1966. 
Miscellaneous (principally Persian 

Gulf and Atlantic ports of Spain): 

Dec. 1, 1966 

Effective date: Jan. 31, 1967. 
Routes on which only one U.S. flag 

carrier now performs service: 

Jan. 2, 1967 

Effective date: March 1, 1967. 



Booklet on O-Ring 
Compounds Available 

"Know Your O-Ring Compounds," a 
booklet compiled by the Defense In- 
dustrial Supply Center (DISC), Phil- 
adelphia, Pa., is now available to re- 
search and development activities to 
assist them in designation selections 
of preferred items of supply. 

The pamphlet provides a cross- 
reference between 0-Rmg fabricators' 
synthetic rubber compound designa- 
tions and Government specifications 
and standards. 

Through the use of information 
compiled for this publication, techni- 
cians have been able to broaden tho 
procurement base for DlSC-managed 
items, and to provide acceptable sub- 
stitutes in the Item Entry Control 
Program. 

Data for the publication were pro- 
vided through the cooperation of com- 
mercial sources and the Military Serv- 
ice engineering support activities. 
Accumulation of data will continue 
to permit updating and expansion of 
the cross-reference document in the 
future. 

Copies of the booklet may be ob- 
tained by writing to: 
Commander 

Defense Industrial Supply Center 
700 Robbins Ave, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 19111 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



DOD Creates New 

Directorate To Deal 

with Food Policies 

A Directorate for Food Service 
Management Systems has been estab- 
lished in the Office of the Assistant 
Secretary of Defense (Installations & 
Logistics) to serve as the focal point 
on all matters pertaining to military 
feeding. 

The primary mission of the new 
directorate is to formulate uniform 
food rationing and food service poli- 
cies for all branches of the Armed 
Forces. 

Creation of the new directorate was 
the result of a study of food rationing 
and food service management systems 
within the Military Services, 

The study revealed that the food 
service program of the Armed Forces 
is the largest in the United States 
and pointed out the need for a cen- 
tralized organization to deal with food 
service and management problems at 
the policy level. 

The directorate is headed by Cap- 
tain James A. Warren, USN, and 
staffed with senior officers from each 
of the Military Services and a civilian 
specialist in feeding and systems man- 
agement. 



Shelter Development 
Program Underway 

The Tactical Air Warfare Center 
(TAWC) and the Air Proving Cen- 
ter (APGC) have embarked on a two- 
fold shelter program at Eglin AFB, 
Fla. There is an urgent need to im- 
prove and modernize portable build- 
ings by generally keeping pace with 
improvements already made possible 
with new materials and methods of 
construction. These shelters would be 
used as hangars, maintenance and 
storage buildings, sleeping quarters, 
etc. 

One part of this two-fold program 
is to develop shelters, or a family of 
shelter which, because of the re- 
quirement, necessitates a two- or 
three-year development period. The 
second, more immediate in nature, in- 
volves the procurement for environ- 
mental and functional testing of 
readily available shelters which po- 
tentially are superior to those pres- 
ently being used but may not satisfy 
long-range requirements. 

One such shelter which is presently 
undergoing tests is the Walter Kidde. 
This shelter comprises a weather- 
proof cover supported by inflated 
tubular structural members. The 
structural members are flexible and, 
when inflated with compressed air, 
they become load-bearing struts which 
assume a hemispherical shape with 
each end anchored to the ground. 
There are full-width openings at each 
end and vehicle and personnel open- 
ings at each side. 

Mr. J. F. Hug'gins at the Climatic 
Laboratory Project Support Office is 
the APGC project officer. Major R. F. 
Arndt is TAWC project officer. 



Wire Rope Specs 
To Change 

The Defense Industrial Supply Cen- 
ter (DISC), Philadelphia, Pa., has 
adopted a suggestion by the wire rope 
industry to use polypropylene cores in 
the manufacture of wire rope. 

DISC, a field activity of the De- 
fense Supply Agency, has in the past 
used natural fibers as cores for wire 
rope. 

The center decided to switch to 
polypropylene after a study revealed 
that natural fiber centers in wire rope 
were required only by Government 
sources. Further, . it was determined 
that, since polypropylene centers are 
used for all commercial applications, 
the Government would profit through 
faster deliveries, lower prices and 
better quality by changing. 

Negotiations have been initiated by 
DISC with military users to revise 
specifications to permit the use of the 
polypropylene centers. Manufacturers 
of wire rope for the Government have 
been furnished new and revised speci- 
fications. 



25 




DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



Contracts of $1,000,000 and over 
awarded during the month of July 
1966: 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

1 Raylon Corp., B. G. Col (on Textiles, New 
York City. $1,184,866. 605,700 yards of 
cotton and nylon oxford cloth. New York 
City. Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia. 

Society Brand Hat Co., St. Louis. $1,020,- 
910. 420,240 wool serne service caps. St. 
Loiila, Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia, 

Pettibonc Mulliken Corp., Washington, 
D.C. $3,990,963. 266 diesel forklift trucks. 
Wnshington, D.C. Defense General Supply 
Center, Richmond, Va. 

The following contracts have bean awarded 
by the Defense Fuel Supply Center, 
Alexandria, Va., for fuel oil and gasoline: 

Shell Oil Co., New York City. $2,667,107; 
Standard Oil Co. of California, San 
Francisco. $1,244,156: Armour Oil Co., 
San Diego, Calif. 81,118.703. 

The following contracts have been awarded 
by the Defense Fuel Supply Center, 
Alexandria, Va., for lubricntlnB oils; 

Standard Oil Co. of Calif., San Fran- 
cisco, $2,200,297. 4,037,069 E als. 
Teiaco, Inc., New York City. 51,430,771. 
2,355,110 gals. 

Delta Petroleum Co., New Orleans. 31,- 
395,721. 3,420,060 gals. 

Ptiipps Products Corp., Boston, Mass. 81,- 
027,082. 1,325,082 gallons of pelro-chem- 
Icals. Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alex- 
andria, Va. 

5 Wheeling Steel Corp., Wheeling Corrugat- 
ing Div., Wheeling, W. Va. 38,796,000. 
24,000 metal shipping boxes. Wheeling. 
Defense General Supply Center, Richmond, 
Va. 

Fniehauf Corp., Military Products Div., 
Fullertoa, Calif. $10,995,030. 25,278 metal 
shipping boxes. Fullerton. Defense Gen- 
eral Supply Center, Richmond, Va. 

Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Mich. $3,- 
831)568. 606,532 gallons of herbicide. 
Midland. Defense General Supply Center, 
Richmond, Va. 

Enstman Kodak Co., Rochester, N.Y. SI - 
327,763. 27,200 rolls of aerial protographic 
fllm. Rochester. Defense General Sunnly 
Center, Richmond, Va. 

Cable Raincoat Co., Boston, Mass. $1,060,- 
400. 80.000 men's lightweight raincoats. 
Boston. Defense Personnel Support Cen- 
ter, Philadelphia. 

Royal Lubricants, Hanover, N.J, $1,444.- 
020. 428,461 gallons of aircraft turbine 
engine lubricating oil. Hanover. Defense 
Fuel Supply Center, Alexandria, Va. 

? n r ? p . man Mi!ls ' Inc - New York City. $1,- 
807.465. 3,980.250 yds of polyester cotton 
broadcloth. New York City. Defense Per- 
aonnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 

~M r AW*L Hew York Gitv - 51,143,660. 
673,100 bed sheets. -New York City De- 
fense Personnel Support Center, Philadel- 
phia. 

~lnn S SL Co " Neo , de ? 1 . Kan. $1,427,800. 
2,200,000 cans of Insect repellent. Neo- 
desha. Defense General Supply Center, 
Richmond, Va. 

7 ~~nt!n P^ f ?" se Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia, has awarded the following 
contracts for combat boots: 



ndicott - N - Y - 

t " Lou!3 ' $1 " 



Aabeboro ' N - 



Brown Shoe Co., St. Louis. $3,305,600. 
320,000 pair. 

Addlson Shoe Corp., Wynne, Ark. $3,- 
416,000. 360,001) pair. 
Carolina Shoe Co., Morganton, N.G. $1,- 
240,139. 120,000 pair. 
Weinbrenner Division of Textron, Inc. 
Milwaukee, Wis. $2,438.832. 231,000 
pair. 

8 Ingersoll Products Division of Borg- 
Warner Corp., Chicago. 51,614,724. 477,360 
steel helmets. Chicago. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia,. 
II Rubber Fabricator's Inc., Grantaville, W. 
Va. S1.27G.700. 170,000 pneumatic mat- 
tresses. Grantsvillo. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 
12 Virginia Tent & Awning Co., Norfolk, Va. 
$2,637,270. 12,000 general purpose tents. 
Norfolk. Defense Personnel Support Cen- 
ter, Philadelphia, 

Peoples Co., Huntington, W. Va. $2,240,- 
572. 10,700 general purpose tents. Hunting- 
ton. Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia. 

South Jersey Clothing Co., Minotoln, N,J. 
$1,001,200. 60,000 men's wool serge coats. 
Minotola. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. 

15 Clark Wire Corn., Cleveland, Ohio] J1.3S9,- 
352. 141,500 coils of concertina barbed 
wire. Cleveland. Defense Construction 
Supply Center, Columbus, Ohio. 
20 Ansul Co., Marinette, Wis. $1,015,200. 
400,000 gallons of herbicide. Marinette. 
Defense General Supply Center, Richmond, 
Va. 

21 Longview Fiber Co., Longvicw, Wash. Sl,- 
044,576. 2,142.105 fiberboard boxes and 
sleeves. Longview. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 
22 Interstate Bakeries Corp., Kansas City, Mo. 
$1,230,665. 22,573,008 cans of white bread. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia. 

25 The Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alex- 
andria, Va., has awarded the following 
contracts for JP-4 jet fuel; 
Sinclair IteBning Co., New York City. 
$4,338,600. 42,000,000 gallons. 
Sun Oil Co,, Philadelphia. S3,2G9,GOO. 
31,500,000 gallons. 

Humble Oil & Refining Co., Houston, 
Tex. $2,683,000. 25,200,000 gallons. 
Cities Service Oil Co., New York City. 
?1, 145,470. 10,600,000 gallons 
27 Camel Mfg. Co., Knoxvllle, Tenn. $3,088,- 
fiSO. 12,000 general purpose tents. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
American Tent & Canvas, Inc., LaFollotte 
Tenn. $2,030,670. 0,000 general purpose 
oi"i i Pl f , enae Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia. 

""S " MfBi , Co " WllHon, N.C. $1,180,636. 
5.GOO general purpose tents. Defense Per- 
sonnel Support Center, Philadelphia. 
28 Gulf Oil Corp., New York City. S4 Ufi 4nn 
42,000,000 gallons of JP-4 jet t uel? Def'onse 
Fuel Supply Center, Alexandria, Va. 

Coastal States Petrochemical Co., Houston, 
Tex $1217,306. 11,7(10,000 gallons of 
JP-4 jet fuel. Defense Fuel Supply 
Center, Alexandria, Va. 

Souhan-Kent Mfg. Co., Clifton Heights, 

cloth. Clifton Heights. Defend" Pcr B onnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia. 



ARMY 

1 Capita] Radio Engineering Institute, 
Washington, D.C. $1,600,000. Classified 
services. Silver Spring, Md. Army Elec- 
tronics Command, Fort Monmouth, N J 

"^nteJ 1 ^ Rubber L ,9- ^kron, Ohio. 
$6,030,243. Shoe assemblies for the M41 
and M4Z family of vehicles. Muncic Ind 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Warren' 

Mich. ' 

Presto-lite Co., Toledo, Ohio. $3,726,221. 
Volt batteries for general vehicle applica- 

r;. w ' A ?Z Tank 
Center, Warren, Mich, 



26 



Jordan Co. & Crown Construction Co 

Columbus, Gn. 53,788,890. Expansion ( 

DCS facilities at Fort Helming, Go. Eng 

neer Dist,, Savannah, Gn. 

Harvey Aluminum, Torrancc, Cnllf. Jl 

680,000. Detonating fuzcu. Torrnnci 

Frankford Arsenal, Philadelphia. 

Farrcll Construction Co., Memphis, Tent 

51,031,008. Kepnir of hurricane darnag 

in Hancock, Mlssisslpi Project. liny Si 

Louis, Miss. Engineer Dial-, Mobile, AlR 

Logistics Management Institute, Washing 

ton, D.C. $1,120,000. Fact finding nun 

lytical studies. Washington, D.O. Deftns 

Supply Service. 

5 Hamilton Wntcli Co., Lancaster, Pn. S3, 
040,000. lOBmm cnrtrUtfso fuzes, Lancaster 
Frunkford Arsenal, Phllatlolphin, 
General Time Corp., Wcstolnx Div., La 
Salic, 111. $3,022,307. Idfiinm eaitrldp 
fuzes. LaSnllo. Frankford Arsenal, PhJla 
del pn in. 

Stewart & Stevenson Services, Houston 
Tex. S3,G40,34fi. Gcnevntor sets. Houston 
Army Mobility Equipment Center, Si 
Louis. 

Chandler Evans, Inc., West I In rt ford 
Conn. $1,509,005. Fuel control units foi 
UII-1 hclicoptcrH. Weal I Inrlford. Arms 
Aviation Mntericl Command, St. Louis. 
Raulo Plchcr Industries, Joplin, Mo. SI,' 
810,746. Wet liatlorleH, pt'lmary typo 1m 
Nike-Hercules. Joplln. Army Electronics 
Com ma nil, Philadelphia. 
General Electric, Lynchburg, Va. $1,672,. 
935. Furnishing and installing n wide 
band transmission system for a radio cora- 
munlciition ByBtem. Kennedy Spneo Cenlcr 
Merrill Island, Fin. Cimnvcral Hiiirliw-i 
Dlst., Merrilt Inland, Fin. 
Admiral Corn., Chicago. S 3,000,027. Com- 
poncnts of AKC-54 rnilio seta. Chicago. 
Army Electronic!! Command, PhilndelpMi. 
Collins Radio Co,, Dallna, Tex. $1,304,0*8. 
AHC-E4 radio Bets. Dallas. Army El- 
Ironies Ciimmnnd, Phllndolphin. 
Hermnn II. West & Co., Murphy, N.C. 
$1,374,707. Clearance of 4.000 ncrM in 
connection with the Dworalmk Dnm nnd 
Iteservoir Project Near Lewbton, Idaho, 
J.nBlneer Diht., Walla Wnlla, Wnsh. 
71* recto ConHlruction Co. r Pittaburgli, Has, 
Sl,404,'i01. Conatructlon In connection 
with the Stockton Dnm and Itwcrvolr 
Project. Near Greenfield, Mo. EnsJnatr 
Disl,, Konans City, Mo. 
Gnrrett Corn., Air Cruisers Dlv., Rclnwr, 
N.J. $1,033,431. Inflatablo slioltere lor tht 
MUST (Medical Unit Sclf-Contntncd 
trnnsportable). Bolmar, N.J, nnd lluena 
Viala, Vn. Heaearch & Duveloiiinoni Com- 
mand, 0/liec of the HurgeOTi Gcnernl, 
Technical Operations, Inc., nurlinglou, 
Mass. $1,050,000. Provision of automttte 
data proeefising Hystem aunpoi-t In connec- 
tion with the development ami design d 
USCONAHC. Port Monroe, Vn, Purctiw- 
iiiff Oftlcc, Port Monroe, Vn. 
Stolto & Santa Po Ennlnccra, Ookhni 
Calif. 51,234,000. Electric power, (load 
lights, security alarm system, teat fttimJ 
buildlnns, Alterations to existing IniiMIrm 
nnd AC onprinc fuel system, lienlo AFB, 
Calif. Eniiinaer Dist., Sacramento, Call! 
S. J. Groves & Son Co., Mnrtlnfiburg, W. 
Va. $8,275,000. Construction of outlet 
works on East Lynn Reaervoir, Twelva 
Pole Creek, W. Va, Engineer Dlst., Hunt- 
ington, W. Vn. 

8 PMC Corp., Snn Jose, Cnlif. $2,^02,215. 
Anti-personnel XM6B5 projectiles, Sau 
Jose. Pleatinny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. 
PMC Corii., Snn Jose, Cnlif. 83,1523.526. 
106mm anti-personnel projectiles, Sn 
Joso. Picntinny Arscnnl, Dover, N.J. 
Northrop Corp., Nortronics Dlv., Anshelni, 
Calif. $3,711,104, 106mm nntl-paraonncl 
projectilea. Anaheim. Picatlniiy Arseiul, 
Dover, N.J. 

Northrop Corp., Nortroulca Div., Ann!ie!m, 
Cnlif. 84,483,625. 105mm anti-personnel 
projectiles. Anaheim, Ficntlnny Arfleni!, 
Dover, N.J. 

Burgess Battery Co., Freoport, 111. 41,28),- 
300. Batteries uacd in tho AN/FHCM 



August 1966 



; rn(U. I'Vi'i'j'i'rl. Army I'iln'InmJi*!! Com- 

1111111(1, rlllllld.'lilllia. 

-* .--Iliiltliimn- Ciiiitrnrtm-H, Im\. llrill limn o 

M<l, $r,,::(iN,inm, <:,,,I,,I,.,I,.H ..... >r ,, [lhl : 

mil ill, 'at Inn riiriirliy iirndiii'ilnn Imll.llnjr 
fnr llu- Nnllniial li.rin-ilv A||i'iu-,v. Furl 
M ..... li', Mil. I'iiiiclmvr Mint., | hi It into iv 

AM. 

M MiiNHiniiii (liiiHilMirl IHII (In., A I .lohiuion 
CnimtniHlnii (' ...... ml IVti-r Kli'wll Hon,i' 

(In., luuitinii (Hlv, M.i. Sl'!.V;iH,ii;i|. Witi'lt 

'>n 1 ..... l( (mil Hum N.I, |.[, Arl.a ..... in Itivrr. 
ArliiiNNii!! unit OlilnliiiMiii l'r,,|,'i>i, Ni'iir 

Kiilbiiw. Ok In. Kimlnror !)('(,, Tiilim, 

Olila. 
- "MiUHini Comiti'iH'lInn (In., llayNm Ohln 

81,,'MiV.YII. Wm'li on <li,> H,.|l<-vlll<> I..D-II 

unil Hum mi tin- Illilii idv.'i-. l'ark,-i'nl,iii-|r 

W, Vn. I'liinlm.'r Him., Himtliml.m, \v' 

Vn, 
-MiiHiui A llniiiti'r, Sllun Minimi {'.a N,. W 

Ynrli City. SUim.lVfi. rn.jn-HI ..... llnr],, 

ItlKlim, 1'iu'ii. A ininil n 1 1 Inn I'nri'Uivnli'iil 

,t tilljinlv Ain-liry, .lull,. |, HI. 

Ill -HCA, Cimuli'ii, N,,l. $;!i,iiim,imii. (:hiiMLln,.|| 
i-li'i'tnuilc r<iiiliuii<<iif, tit ..... ti'ii, A rm v 

V I'JIi'i'troiik'fi diniiM ...... I, Fnrl MMiihi.n.lli 

' N..I. 

lliwln'" Alr.-r<ifl, Ciilv.T Cltv, CiiHf 3.1. 
M.IIMH. |.'V nniV I'nlL.w,,,, ,.,.,,,.,,,,-n ,,',! 
ih'vi'hijimi'iil f.>r iln- TllVV ,\Hi,..||,. tii-iiii-m 
(l|i!vi.|'(IHy |YI,',[,| iiiMl'ru ........ . Ail.-., Arinv 

Mhiilf,' ( nmmiiiiil, Hniiinvillr, ,\)n, 
CliryrtliT Muliini. llHr.tji S"' ] [n tluf 

(liinin I.I.-II-MI, tvuHir. will. .l-d.',,'..' ;],' 
\\IIITHI, Atli'h, Army Timli AuhujmiK,, 

(,1'llllT. Wlll'l-.'ll, MMl, 

I,. K. Mil ..mi {'., llv,],. ]. m ,| M(lli|t , _ 
nUB.VMK. r,,,...,;, Mv.l,. I',,,.!,, A,,,mi,;,lil,,l, 
]|riH'lir('iii..MI ,V ;.il|,|.| V Ai;,.|irv, .lull, -I. Ill 

Irllllly I nil'ilrnrlloii (',,. nn.l Ilmir Itrnlu^ 
liiK (. llini.ili.il, 'IV., ?;:,)<!!/, ; ..... w ,,ik 
" ll'i- Kiiirnl.. IIHV..U niul Trllmi,,, (,-,, 

ii'Min 1'i'M.f.vt. r.Mid.i,.,.,. in,,!., tii.iv, ..... ,; 

l.tiwli'im <in<| Alf.ir.l, hi.'., Au-illu 'IV\ 

8i.< 17.1.1.. t:,.,,,,,,,,,., ....... t ......... ,';,;, ,; : 

iiii,!,.,,,, !, miim,,, , ,.,, ;lm 

i'Kli.r..,- I.h,l., AILiinm.,' ...... . M..M 

1 



IH 



111 m ..... '' ,"'""- l't'itrii.-llnit I',,.. M ...... , 

i'1'V. Aln, ?lti.:iV:i.iuiii \\' M ,'i, ,, ., 
Mill'"-'" I ..... Iv m,l MUM W, , Mm, V. 

"" IVnv ' At " '' :; "'''' ::: ' "-' 



20 J'r'TNV 11 '''- .v 1 "" 1 ..... '!"" ""- s'.^h.- 

Till. Ivld-llcii t>i>tti<c ririv.'.-, fnr ;'| ,... . 

J " "rvliut Mtld-r.,! ,, hl ,|,,., n , ,*,"() 

Army .,, ,., . ,, ..... ,_ ,..,, ,., ; 

A in iv J,nliir t -r lV M r,, r . J.-..H 11,-lvnh V, 

nivn r )ir| i.. -l. ,|, (,> A .(,, II 

'' 1 " 



ID. ami "in iif.f, 

'-'' 



S .' 
S' 



. 

"' 



, 

""".. llr "" "' "" 



"' 



Fta ' ""''". 

y*\ M itr " 1 ' 1 

t .. J n rl. fl .,iivlHo, 



. Art,. 11.487.. 
, tbllvcry, iii. 



Industry BuIloUn 



n MI! f i Infiiil Afoini* Ju( i>u t \ T i * ' HIM! i.o,, 

UIHIjllHK ] ,| Mr I It f |, MI ) LI* J ir * .* ' "" ~ 




..- M, 
,' I"',"". " ^ !l ""l''V A|!,.,,ry, .Inllrl, I!]. 

I- 1 'ri 1.17 ''""VT","' I " 1 '" '""'BVI..W. -ivx. 

ui i ,;;' 7"" f ;"; ''"'""mi,,,, 

-!* !.:i:H\^i I , 1 ;. i ;: ii :, i ::!, l l t .! iiii ll r r "' 11 '" 1 - 

A, II Umllli Cnrii,. I'M,-.,,,,,, 5ii ( nH !tl j.[|: t 
M-ti.t i>mn. fj,, ; .|..,m,l|,l,,|, |, (llll | ];l ^ ! ' 

1111 ' 111 -"' 1 ' 1 " 1 '- 1 



. 

'I'lny, III,... Whn|||,,|;r ..... IM!> 

;;;'; '';:;," l l ...... ' ii^^n. 

" " """' 1 nf (l1 " 



NAVY 



i.'T 

U ,,'1 .''l,,-' 1 '' 1 ' 1 "" 1 " 1 '"'l'"'' "I'.TIl- 

"' I'Mlk-rrjn, .-,.,.1,.,- ,,,,,1 !,(., | 1)tl . r . 
; . iiMli.i, .',.,,,,,1,., fnlnmtmn. Nim.l Air 
.'Mil, mi, i , .him,,, ul, 

n.n'-'j.M.'-ir 1 '','?" Atl " ll<1 "' t'"lnmlm,,. Ohio. 
llU.(i^Mi,(.. I Mm.,.,,,1,,11 ( A r.A wi'iiininii 

V" 1 " 11 t',' "". ' [* " r ''"'HHHUilhin. C..l- 
imiliM-., Niiviil Air ;; Vi ,irmn r'umi.mti.l. 

;,"!!,' A " lrrl '''' A lB ..... i, Cnh.mlmii, ()),!, 
H .I'M.i..,. ,,V IOA iilM-n.f,. i:,,|, ,.il, ,. 
ftwvftl Air .s^itctii'i IVimimtiil, 
Mn^r,. llfliiil c'nrii.. Timi huinimom Vo.. 
l,-ii Ixliiml I. liy, N.Y, 3;!.l|.lli,IUlll. Fin, 
;;!""r.-l f.-imtMirrtt for H,,. '('..rpicr ini.l 
Idiinr ijih-.ll.. ,,v,,i,.,,r., I,,I,IK l.ihiml Cliy. 

tlf.liNiii,',. (iynn-tnrt ('..niinliml, 7 

111 " 11 * 



-..n-r. .I.II .rln. 
Ntivnl Air :ij,nli'liln I niniillilli]. 
I'lillfri Alrrrn. I'rnit & Whllnty Alrcrnfl 

ir.V".. . " lirl '""i. ''"mi. si:t.(Ma..io. 

'i,'"., A I',""' 11 ''" f " r "'" N "vy. Kr.ui. 

l(*iilf.,nl. Nnnil Ale Ilytilfiiin n,mmninl. 



m.. ,. " 'viii', n. .. 

,,tj,t,|ttJ. I itntrtifil ...... / ii ,t!|i milittinru. 

i.iii-r rrnfv iclili-l,-. Hiiiuijvdli!. Niivul 
flhi|i hynlcmn I ntniimii.1. 
Hjnilrtt Arinnmnil. Inr,. <;k>mlnlo. G\\t. 
S\,f>ltM\t. Alrrrnft Inuiili c^rtur rnrkn. 



,...-., 

I 'III In lit' I Jill ill, 

rinvlrr ('rit., Hldmintul HIM, N.Y. SI,. 
.UJ.filH, Kuilitr Httil|.inivnt fur Inntnllatluii 



nlinnril mival HlihiH. Kluhmonil Hill. Niwnl 
Will fiyiit.umi (l.iiinnaiHl. 

""^i",'^ .,,';,"" ,,y i ' rt "' " Iv - Morion, Pii. 
br..ina.l.3ia. C|[-4(IA and im-JflA licll- 
l^ 1 ,' 1 "- Morion. Nuviil Air Hybilemn <^,in- 

-JjriiniinQii Aircraft Knnlnoi-rlnii Corp., 
""I l'"[t, -. .. N.Y. ?7.1,10B ( 4im. A OA 
J'l^ifl.^ HolliiiiiKu. Nnvul Ah- Syiitcnw 

IIiillpil Alrrrnft, HlkorHhy Alrprafl lHv.. 

W Kfnrd, (irtriii. 8H,ri7(l,0U. IIII-IMI) 
!:Sh- Mr '" riiri1 ' Nvl Airayu-m* 
{'"tl"-WrlBlil CJorp., Wrlnlil-Acroimiiilnil 
I'll.. rt.ioil-liliU;,', N.,1, SI,IMl(l,(Hlil. IWIuii. 
'l"vi'l[i|>, rnlii-lniK-. (nil ami rnrniiih i, Huiil.l 

N,',v,} ^ ] 1! "'""' l l t<111 'W' 1 ' 1 '". Wmid-KMH,.. 
Nnwil A r Syolcniji CinrimiiiKi, 
- ii llnl Altprnfl. I'rntl & Wliltiiry Alrn-nfl 
iro'i, 'i'V 11 "'" l|r( "''l. Conn. S17,IIH.:!7(I. 
A!;: L , """ lll>11 - |i;m "' lliirlf,,nl. Nuvnl 
Air hytUcmn Cniniininil. 

' "?m r "w\ l ? r , l< ; l ,!i';. (ll ' l "'">", Kill. ll.!!fifl,. 

'- WAI.I.KYH itul.lH w,'an,m,i nnJl iv- 

r"',' 1 wiiiipiiifiil. Orliiu ..... Nuviil Air 

Hyuli'iiiii Cominnml. 

l''iii|[hH Aln-rnri. l,,ni; lliwli, (lullf. $14,. 

li.' i ^ '. II 1 , 1 ' 1 TA ' 1F "''"""'I. I..HIK 
i-iirli. NnvMl Air HyHtt-mri Duiiiminul. 

'n 1 ^,'! 1 ' I "''" 1 '' 1 I .It'hrim.ii Cllv, N.Y. ?!!,. 
'"..-.tlM. Ant.mmlli: ,,H,,t r mi i ni | J1%vil [ t . m!l , 
^l;;;^'' City. NMV..I Air HyMl,.,.m u" 

'J !'. 1 " 1 ' !)nl , r ; r " |1 ' > " H'wurd ItriK-nrfh Illy., 

AHIiiii nri. V. Si! ii;tv..|:tr,. ].;iml,,r 1 .H,i ( [ and 
"Hl'itnrt .i.'pvl.'i' ? f.ir l'],vi Unlliiiilr M|,mllu 
nm," i " ll " lllllli " llfl ' H l lllll l"t I'r.ijivt.i 

(Jriiffnl llynninlrji, ICh>drlo llnl IHv.. 
'V'"' ..... l "! M11 ; , iJfi.-l.K41!, 71111. CmiiiiritMtUm 

if two tviiU-iilrdim,,,,! lln-t ,,11,.,-,,. (i,,) m . V( 

li,',"' 'i' i'l T M i'" H >' 1 "" 111 " <:"iminl, 

I limit Aln-mfl, lliiK',.|- Ci, v , (Jiillf S"(l - 

. "'T lltilVfun.llMKr.M.'tCl'Mt.A 
'" ...... ' Nnvul Air HyiitKimi Coiu- 

'!!.!! l f V ; 'n. Aln ;'.'' <n ',, 1 ' rr " 1 * Wlillnty Air- 

, , lv ;', K " ! '! "'"'""r'1. ""mi. SH.TRII,. 
..... . 'I'" ln :j!;! f " " f -Ii-Hlitii nnrl ili>v.*ln|>. 
r "M'"',' V" '' "''HKl'"'. Kn,.l llm'l- 

f;nil. Nnvul Air Kyud-ni^ lltmimund, 

n'i^ti!"'^, 1 .'"!',^'' ""'"""'"'. rniir. ?i,. 

.I'l'' 1 ! ' " ""A |.n,t.,lvi, m'lf- i .,,nh l |,i,',l 
mvlimi nil and ,i|mH ran,;,' iilrillmi.kivi). 
nit H.vHlmi!!. llNwIlinrn,'. Niivitl All- Mv'i- 
ti'iiiii I iiiiininiiil. 

i(illinin (In., I.i.sliinl.in, Maun. S4,(lH.|,lW,'| 
i'.iln!,V|' d.'vi'li.|inu<iil .if u ,| t ,a| ||rn cnn- 

M!.' Ll 1 ''; '''!' r '"' ''?."'""' " hl ""' I-""limin,i. 
Naval (Irdniinn. H,v,il,.mn (Inmninntl. 
.'i.Tiil llj'iiiuiilfN. I'linmn,,, Culif, si,,!']-,! . 
*" I'l'H Jind ,'vnlimtlim .,f (, ..... ,,v,.,in-iilri 
1 '. ""''"'I'l' 1 il"ili(ii of llu. Ht.imliir.l Mlit. 
V "' l'"''i"N". Naval Oi'ili.m ..... Hy ..... n,n 
l mimimnl, 

WMlliiirliiiniio MU-rlrlr, IIiulcrHniH lllv., 

1 iiJHi.mr,., M.I. Sil.llii.inm. l.i>,,,r !i> n( 
'"'" il( J" !l "';"" "K '"' lr ...... . Iliil ' 

1,'i,,,^"^ ' , nl "i!^" ^"l''''!'' t-MNimaiiil, 
i.m'hlienl Mlmill.'H K Hiniru ( ., Hiimiyuj,, 

f'nllf. S-!.r,iMi,m.ll, .SNH.orl <,f ih,! !'!, n- , 
jj^tinnn. Huiinyviili-. H ( ,^li,l I'H,J ( .|.(,I (if. 

Ijurklirril MI N ||,'H A H,,,,,-,, ( ; n> , Hiiiiuyvulf. 
'-"If, W.liva.mm. |{,.|,iilr of I'oli.rl., I,',|,MI |,l 
Ollil''""'" 1 ' !ll "" lvv " 1 "- Hl'w'liil Vi'i'Jii'-Iri 



l'n,J- 



^ A HIIIICO Co., 



' 

iv i, , oa,, tI ,|H H |t,, ,iy 1( | (!lh . 
.Snnnyval.'. M|i. :( .||,] l'i-,,J,'da Oltliri-. 
jriimninn Alrcrnfi Kmrlnwrliin Cnru., 
n.'lltprm,. ,(-.[., N.Y. 8tt,lUB.m)0. C-HAai'- 
' llllinwt ' 1 Nlw "' Alr H 



Ml, Mlllill. ?1,!K(7,IMO, 

p "" "-'""j "imi'i'liilti ami otl^irL t*\r 

Air 'l!!!.i A 1 l r V' 1 " 1 " 1 ''I'" 11 - Mllim - "^" v ''i 

Air Myiili'inti ( onnimiiil, 

Ynritimy literlrlr Corii.. Now Yoi'lt (Illy. 

117 tiiriiiHlii Imtiurion, rliwailn"",' (i./mt! 

Nnvy I'urc hniiliijr Offlro, Wiwhlnirti n, 1J.O 

-Hlmiilox Wire ft (,'nlilo Cn,, Newiimton, 

iiin^.l lit nct'nnoKrniiiilc rcHciirnli. Mnwlnir- 
liin. Nnvy I'uniliiiiliiir Olllco, WniilHimtoii, 

-Mnchlnery Ansortntim, Inc., Nnrbctli 
Sl,()4n.4au. MiiRhhu'ii to hi! UKod In' 
niudcrlxntlon itrutrniniH. Fond <lu 



27 



Wis. Navy Purchasing Office, Washington, 
D.C. 

11 Sperry Gyroscope Co., Syossct, L.I., _N.Y. 
$4,326,987. Repair of fleet ballistic missile 
submarine navigation sub-system compo- 
nents. Syosset. Naval Ship Systems Com- 
mand. 

Sperry Rand Corp., Univac Div., St. Paul, 
Minn. S2,71U,123. Computers and related 
equipment and services for use on the 
Naval Tactical Data System aboard fleet 
ballistic missile submarines. St. Paul. 
Naval Ship Systems Command. 

General Electric, Light Military Electron- 
ics Dept., Utica, N.Y. S-t.639,504. Guidance 
and control groups for Chaparral missiles 
for the Army. Utiea. Naval Air Systems 
Command. 

Western Electric, New York City. S3.3G3,- 
G73 and S2, 2-13,512. Classified research and 
development in oceanographic services. 
Whippany, N.J. Navy Purchasing Office, 
Washington, D.C. 

U.S. Steel, Pittsburgh, Pa. $1.048,661. Bull- 
pup guided missile warheads. Pittsburgh. 
Naval Air Systems Command. 

Sanders Associates, Nashua, N.H. $1,120,- 
122. Research and development on classi- 
fied electronics equipment. Nashua, Naval 
Air Systems Command. 

Mnxson Electronics Corp., Old Forge, Pa. 
53,631,551. Hullpup missile parts. Old 
Forge. Naval Air Systems Command. 
12 Lenkurt Electric Co., San Carlos, Calif. 
1,358,559. Micro-wave system for com- 
municatioas. San Carlos. Nnvy Purchas- 
ing Office, Washington, D,C. 

Texas Instruments, Dallas, Tex. $3,570,817. 
Shrike missile guidance and control sec- 
tions and nirf rames. Dallas. Naval Air 
Systems Command. 

Straightlinc Mfg. Co., Cornwell Heights, 
Fa. 51,792,745, Fin assemblies used with 
the Mark SI Moil I bomb. Cornwell 
Heights. Navy Ships Parts Control Cen- 
ter, Mechanicsbure, Pa. 

13 Astro-Science Corp., South El Monte, Calif, 
S1,G20,CC5. Airborne sound recorder-re- 
producer sets for ASW data recording. 
South El Monte. Naval Air Systems Com- 
mand. 

Spcrry Hand Corp., Bristol, Tenn. $1,238,- 
3%, LAU34 missile launchers for use on 
A7A and F4 aircraft, llristol. Navy Pur- 
chasing Office, Washington, D.C. 
14 Tncoma Boatbuilding Co., Tncoma, Wash. 
814,717,815. Five motor gunboats. Taconm. 
Naval Ship Systems Command. 

Peterson Builders, Inc., Sturgeon Bay, 
Wis. 514,288,640. Five motor gunboats. 
Sturgeon Bay. Naval Ship Systems Com- 
mand. 

McDonnell Aircraft, St. Louis. 96,400,- 
000. FY 19GG procurement of F-4E, F-4J, 
F-4D and RF-1C aircraft. St. Louis. 
Naval Air Systems Command. 
15 National Steel & Shipbuilding Co., San 
Diego, Calif. $24D,llO,DBfl. Construction 
of 17 tank landing ships. Snn Diego. Naval 
Ship Systems Command. 

General Dynamics, Electric Boat Div., 
Ore-ton, Conn. $111,487,785-, Design and 
construction of four nuclear powered at- 
tack submarines. Groton. Navnl Ship 
Systems Command. 

Raytheon Co., Lexington, Mnss. $4,509,- 
994. Improved data converters, with as- 
sociated ordnance alterations, aparc pavta 
and technical documentation for AN/ 
SPG-51B rndar sets. North DIghton, Mass. 
Naval Ordnance Systems Command. 

North American Aviation, Autonetics Div., 
Anaheim, Calif. $2,078,246. Repair of 
Ships Inertial Navigation Systems gyro- 
scopes and velocity meters. Anaheim. 
Nnvat Ship Systems Command. 

Royal Industries, Engineered Products 
Div., Alhambra. Calif. $1,821,321. Ex- 
terna auxiliary fuel tanks. Alhambra. 
Naval Air Systems Command. 

Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp., 
Norfolk, Va. $1.328,000. Regular overhaul 
of the oiler USS TRUCKEB (AO-147). 
Dili i Ill(]uatrinl Manager, 6th Naval 
l8 Western Eluctric, New Yorfc City. 86,776,- 
; , Bn - c nstrucUon, testing and 
installation of a submarine towed acoustic 
array system. Whippany, N.J. Naval Ship 
Systems Command. 

"~n C3 Ei as r " strun ' cn ' ( '. Inc., Apparatus Div,, 
Dallas, Tex $1,878,480. Spnre parts for 
T 5, A NMPS-80 radar sets in P-3A 

nS* TH-i?" 1 ^ 8 -!., Navy A *iation Supply 
Office, Philadelphia. 



28 



Tlilokol Chemical Corp., Reaction Motors 
Div., Dcnville, N.J. 85,255,840. Prepack- 
ciKcci liquid propullant rocket engines for 
HULLPUF missiles. Rockaway, N.J. Nav- 
al Aiv Systems Command. 

Coructta Construction Co., Deaplaines, 111. 
S,7G2,HOQ. Construction of n barracks ami 
mess hnll at Hie Nava! TralninB Center, 
Great Lakes, 111. Midwest Div., Naval 
Facilities Eiiisinecrins Command. 

Willamette Iron & Steel Co., Richmond, 
Calif. $1,394,477. Overhaul and repair of 
the attack transport USS MAGOFFIN 
IAPA-11IU). Richmond, Industrial Man- 
niter, 12th Nnvnl District. 

19 General Precision, Inc., Llbrascope Group, 
Glondale, Calif. S6,70fi,000. Mk 48 tor- 
liciio fire control system modification kits 
nnd related equipment. Glandule. Nnvnl 
Ordnance Systems Command. 

North American Aviation, An ton dies Div., 
Anaheim, Calif. $1,524,000. Evaluation 
nnd test program on Hhiji Incrtlal naviga- 
tion system equipment. Anaheim. Naval 
Ship Systems Command. 

Sperry Gyroscope Co., LOUR Island, N.Y. 
Sl,30jj,GG2. Various components of tho 
inertinl navigation subsystems of (luet 
ballistic missile submarines. LOUR Island. 
Naval Ship Systems Command. 

Todd Shipyards, Snn Pedro, Calif. 51,338,- 
192. Regular overhaul of the landing uhlp, 
dock USS MONTIC13LLO (LSD-3G). Ban 
Pedro. Naval Ship Systems Command. 
20 Masnavox Co., Fort Wayne, I nil. $1,000,- 
000. Modification kiln niui related equip- 
ment for airborne nidnr nets. Fort Wayne, 
Naval Air Systems Command. 

National Geophysical Co., Dallas, Tex. S2,- 
508,840. Components of Mark ET> Mod 7 
mines. Dallas. Naval Ordnance Plant, 
Louisville, Ky. 

22 Curt Iss- Wright Corp., Aeronautical Div., 
Wood-Ridge, N.J. $1,422,223. Kits for 
conversion of RS3GO-2fi engines for use in 
A-1E/F/G/H aircraft. Wood-IU(l B c. Navy 
Aviation Siipiily Office, Philadelphia. 

North American Aviation, Autoneties Div., 
Anaheim, Calif. S3,2_81,17r>. Hepnlr of 
ships inertial navigation systems. Ana- 
lieim. Navnl Ship Sy sterna Command. 
25 Carrier Air ConditioniitR Co., Now York 
City. 51,017,000. Air conditioning: plants 
for submarines. Syracuse, N.Y. Naval 
Ship Systems Command. 

General Electric, Schcneclady, N.Y. $10,- 
147,440, Design and furnishing of Navy 
unclear reactor compartment comnononts. 
Schcneclady. Naval Ship Systems Com- 
mnnd. 

Spcrry Gyroscope Co., Syoaset, L.I., N.Y. 
51,486,707. Submarine inertial navigation 
equipment. Syosaet. Naval Ship Systems 
Command. 

2fi Nordic Conslriiclion Lid., Honolulu, 
Hawaii. 51,074,600, Modification to 
Commandoi-in-Chicf. Puiiilic, Headquar- 
ters, Camp Smllh, Hawaii. Navul Facili- 
ties BtiftiueerliiB Command. 
27 Ampcx Intcrnationnl Operations, Inc., 
Redwood City, Calif. 81,1^5,131. Ampcx 
tape recorder reproducer systems pliia 
components and tesl equipment, llcdwood 
City. Navy Purchasing Office, Hrooklyn, 

28 Otis Elevator Co., Defense and Industrial 
Div., Brooklyn, N.Y. $2,421,351. Shin- 
board fire control system components. 
Hrooklyn. Naval Ordnance Systems Com- 
mand. 

-Kyan Aeronautical Co., San Diego, Calif. 
1,172,000. Installment funding for FIIIE- 
BEfo drones. San Diego. Naval Air Sys- 
tems Command. 

20 Holaml Machine & Mfg., Inc., New Or- 
leans, La. $1,723,321. Complete construc- 
tion of a surveying ship. Now Orleans. 
Naval Ship Systems Command. 
General Dynamics, New York City; Litton 
Systems, Inc., Culver City, Calif.; nnd 
Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction 
Lo Seattle, Wash. (Each are receiving 
identical contracts for $6,276,000). Develop- 
ment of Fast Deployment Logistic Ship 
package proposals. Qnlncy, Mass,, Culver 
Uty, Calif, and Arlington, Vn, Naval Shin 
(systems Command. 



AIR FORCE 

1 ~~?, oe , inff . Co " Seattle, Wash. $40,200,000, 
Modernization of MINUTEMAN Wing I 
Malmstrom AFB, Mont. Balliutic Systems 
Div. (AFSC), Norton AFB, Calif. 



General Dynamics, Fort Worth, Tex, SI,. 
731,367. Production of mollification kiu 
and related equipment ftiv tile U-68 nlr- 
eruft flight control ay at em. For I Worth, 
San Antonio Air Material Areft (AFLCt, 
Kelly AFB, Tex. 

Scrv-Air, Inc., Vnnco API!, Okln. S7.-J4S,. 
B18, Support services for FY 07, Vante 
AFH. Sun Antonio Air Mnttriol Area 
(AFLC}, Kelly AFB, Tex, 

Pnn American World Ainvayn, New York 
City. ?! 2,1) 00,000. MamiKement, oiwmllnn 
ami tnaintciinncQ services for th-e Air 
Force Eastern Tost llniipre, Patrick At'B, 
Fla. Air l-'nrco Eimtern 'rust. RaiiRO, 

HcrciilcH, Inc., WilminirLon, Del. $3,000,000, 
Rocket motorH and related ilntn for the 
MINUTWMAN inlsHile. Kwnvil, N.J. OE- 
den Air Materiel Area (AFLC), Hill AFD, 
Utnh. 

Lenr Sicglcr, Inc., Grand Uapida, IHeh, 
S2,04.(,21H. I't-odiiotlon of nircraft Imtnb- 
iiiB computurs. (irnnd Raiiiiln. Ap-rnnnu* 
tlcnl Syfltcms Div. (AFSO), Wrlnlit- 
Patterdon Al'"ll, Ohio. 

Lockheed Aircraft, Ontnrlo, Calif. S7,COO,- 
000. Maintenance serviccH duriiiB FY C7 
for F-104 aircrnfl. I.nko AFIi, Arii. 
Saeramento Air Materit-l Aren (AFLC), 
McClcllan AFH, Calif. 

Ii Hazcllinc Corp., I.lttlo NrcU. L.I., N.Y. 
S1.404,r.liB. Work on the MARK Xll re- 
entry velilcli?. Little Nok. Aeninaiitlfji] 
SyntemH Div. (AFSC), WrtahM'ntteHon 
AFH. Ohio. 

Air ProdnrlH ft Chcndcnlfi, Inc., Allen- 
town, Pn. $1, (100,000. Hulociillon nnd moJI. 
iientlnn nf n liijiiid oxyKon/nltroRcn iilnnl 
at VnndnlK!ric AF11, Cnllf. Unniaiic Sw- 
tonia I)iv. (AKSC), Norton Al-'l.f, CnHf. 

Wllcox IDIcctrlc Co., KaiiBiui City, Mn. 31,- 
aSirj.OOO. Production of I'imiimitiierithn! 
cnulimiont. ICansaH filtv, Aeronautical 
SyHUmiH Dlv. (AFSC), WriRlil-Pattw^n 
AFH, Ohio. 

National Lead Co., Toleilci, Ohio. $1.8SJ,. 
OGO. Production at honibii, Tiilwrln. A*tt>- 
nnutical Systems Dlv. (AFSC!), \Vrlfihl- 
I'atlerH.m AFII, Ohio. 

WcHtinichoimc Ulcclric, Hnltlmnra, Mil, 
S!i,778,r.!l'l. Modification of aoiinih niwi 
lieijrht Iliuloi 1 riifldi'H, HnUlninw. Okljihomn 
City Air Materiel Arc a (AFLC), Tinker 
AFH, Okla. 

Ling Tcmco-Vimglit RIcctrflsyntcniH, Inc., 
Crocnvlllc, Tux. $4,H40,()2H, InspMtion 
and repair HisrvlccB for K-IOH uh'i'fnft. 
Greenville, H.C. Snn Antoniii Air Mntc- 
riel Area (AFLC), Kelly AFH, Tex. 

Honeywell, Inr., Hoiiklrm. Minn, 81,1*6.- 
IfiS, Innrt:nnIiiK production unnliiiiioiit Jor 
tliu iiroduction of alrurnfl orilnnncc. HO-II- 
kins. Aeronautical Systems IMv. (AFSO), 
Wrlitlit-Pattoriion AFB, Oh in, 

fiencrnl Klcrlrlc, Oinclnnntl, Oliln. ?l,7fl3.- 
S-10. Work on (he advanced V/STOIi uro- 
Ki'am, Clni-iiinnU. Aeroniuillcnl Syalems 
Div. (AFSC), Wrlitht-l'attcrHoii AFI1, 
Ohio, 

Collins Haillo Co., Ucilnr Hniildn, Iow, 
Sl,B06,flU7, Prodiifition of spare imrtsi hi 
Voi'y Ilitth Frequency Conintunicnliaaia 
Systems. Ccdin- HupidR, Wnrncr Holilns 
Air Materiel Area (AKLC) Itautna AFII, 
Oa. 

-Kochrlnff Co., SprliiRftcld, Ohio, SI,2I.- 
0112. Production of air camo londliiB nnd 
itnloiuliiiK trucks. Spi-iiiRficld, Acvunni!- 
tical Systemii Div. (AFRO). WrlRlit-Pnl- 
torsion AFI), Ohio. 

Oshkosh Motor Truck, Inc., Oshknsli, Wb, 
$1,B08,02J, Overhniil of SHOW rcmovnl 
c(iui]imont. Onhkoah. Wnrncr Itdbliis Air 
Materiel Ai-ea (AFLC), HoLliiR AKll. 6*. 

VITRO Services, Eitllu AF(t, Fin. !9,- 
000, H7. MnnnKomont nnd niiofatlon ef 
land ranucH nnd the EjrUn Gulf teat rnnge 
for FV 1007. Air Proving Ground Outer, 
Efflin AFB, Fla. 

Honeywell, Inc., Hopkins, Minn. $1,762,- 
101. Englncerinir dovelo]>ment of an null- 
tank land mine. Hopkins. Air Proving 
Ground Center, E K lln AFH, Fla. 

AVCO Corp., Richmond, Iml, 34.087,000. 
Production of aircraft orilnnnco filter 
contninora nnd related cijiiiinncnL Kith- 
mond. Aeronautical Syatcma Dlv. (AFSC), 
WrlKhl-Piittorii AFB, Ohio, 

Hcndlx Corp., Tetcrhoro, N.J. $l,810,2a 
Production of electronic equipment for the 
C-141 aircraft, Tctcrboro. AerorautJcfll 
Systoma Dlv. (AFSC), Wright-Put I waon 
API), Ohio. 

Consolidated Dlcsol Electric Corp., Slam- 
ford, Conn. $1,774,44-1. Production ol 



August 1966 



triiHtB for lomlinif mid iiiiluadiiiu nlriiriifl, 
cnriro. Stamford. Aeronaut li-al Ny;il.'Miii 
Div. (AKHC), WrtKhl-I'nllermm A Kit, 
Onlo. 

fJenonil DyniiinlcH, Kurt. Worth, Tex. 811 - 
GlH.JliO. Inniii'irtlr.n inul i-i<|ntir of II fi'tl 
nlreruft. I'Wl Worth, Hnn Anlniilii Air 
Mnti-'i'h'l Ari-a (AKI.(!), Kelly AKIt. Tex 

fi'cncnil Mdloni, IrulinHiipuKii, In,|. g,| ( . 
(ifill.Blfi, Cnni|niiii>iil Itiii.i'ovciiK'iil Fur (In, 
'['fill nlrrrfl, rnulni,. lri.|liutriini||!i. Ar'ni. 
nniitlcitl Kyiileiiiii Dlv. (AKHC), Wrl.jlit- 
1'iiUi'nmii AKll, 0!llo, 

--llllirlli'it Aim-lift, liiifi Ainteli'ii. sjtt.Hlll l)|i'/ 
Moililli'iitlcin of Knlriui nlivnifl in Inn 1 1,.;.' 
Tw'iioii, Arlvi, Wtirner Itol.iiin Air Mitlerlel 
Anin (AKI.O). Id.Mim AMI, (In. 

I.H.M., Itonkvlllr', Mel, S I, mill,:! -HI. Mn I n, 

tDNHlli 1 )! lllhl ini|.|.ly ,ui|j|, ( i|'l f ,,','' ,\'lr KNIT," 

[iimiimlrni. Khiinil N.Y, Mm-niineiiln 

Ah- Materiel Area (AKI.C). Me(:iel]tui 
AFH, Calif. ' 

Mnirtinvnx, Kurt. Wiiyne. In.l, Sl.lft: 1 (10(1 
PriiiMirtloii i.f nlr.Tiif) ciiiiiiiiiinli'iiiloiiM 
(>(|llimeii(. I'ni'l Wnyiie, WnriMT Uublnn 
Air Miittfi-lcl Arm (AK.'U!). Uiilijuii Al'lt 
(in, ' 

-Hntiitcrw AnnurlnU-n, Nnnlinn, N.ll 31 .|'/ll - 

anil, rniilmill r I'l.Tlronl |Ml].im-ni 

Miuimm, Ai-r-iiiiiullrn! Mynli'inii I)|u' 
(Al''f)(l), WHulil-rnMiinM.ii A KM, Olih, 

- |CXIIH_ IiiHlriiinmit, Inr,, Ditllim. TI-\. BJ! - 

}!"',, ' 1|111 ' 1 ' 1 H * ' <"' iiK'-iii"'''^'.'.'!.^! 1 .' 

In m.. Wiinier I ,,i, A) , M M.,.r1,,| An,, 
(AH.II), ll'ihliiii AMI. (Ja. 

Hiili'Hvllln Mf, ('., llnlrnvillr Arli Kl 

ODO.Oim. rri>iliii>(l.ni nf h 1. ,- '.. , 

>v / MI I ' iJimui i i.lll|i'ilU h lll1K 

(AK.SUL Wrlitlil.I'n||,.n.i,ii 'AKl'l."Vllil,,. '' 

' K*"^^^ 
1'iiiMlilimlraMitii!) .i|iii,,.iir,il. l.nriu I,,),,,,,! 



. 
"S |IA ;^^ 

M.'!i for THOU i>|. ( ..... | ...... ,, N,;,,,!,'. 

Mi., fltmt'i- MyiMfNiii [llv, (ARICl 1 ,,<i 
AiiKi'lcii. ' ' 

Anil!' ^""T' 1 '!!'; Av . ln "''. Anlm.Ml.-B III*.. 

Aiiilir-ln. (, n ||f. s!|.nv,i ilin , r , ..... 

'"'J"". 11 '? ..... Ml" 1 ""'""" iml.lN n' " 

wi^hAw^ M<i "" i " 1 A ..... 

7- -Itnyllinm i:.. I ..... f,, n |, Min.t.. aUKirtil 
Mn MH-iiniin- ,,f tl..- Ha. ,,,( u n ,nr II , 
Wl.imnn A I- 1 I. N,M, Ml.'.ih, | ,,, , ', \i 
'' ; ''"""" ( 



. 

, 'A .: r ilt ' r '" 'l nHtlim-mm,-,, ,f 

)v i ,r , "i;' 111 ' ''"' <ir !tll '""r -''I" 
f i 'I IH./. Hnll.oiiiiu AKII. N.M, Ml,,.. 

gi^n.v.i,,,.,,,,,,. .:, n,ii,, im , tl AI il. 

S lc ' r !!!, l il!r |ll , r , lpi {lv /" ........ N ' v < '."-.- 

m. , "' lltl "" ll " ( "f IU-...M..1 ..[. ,.,(,. 

' 



,,,,, 

N'N'KiTi AMI, {\H\\t. 



III (AI I ' Ili ' u/ A ', n '"''''tl<'i.l Hycirn... 
Itlilii. (AI ' 1(<) - Wrlnlii,|'t,ii,'rMi.ii AMI. 



a i 7 f i7, - 

1 W IN?'' w 1 '".',"":" 1 , ' ...... ' 

i 1 il " N< "'"' Atll ""l" 

Si '&'" ft 111 - 11 , 1 

Air Muii "*' f " l '' t ' 1 "' 1 ' 

AF11. 



. N.J. 

ii nr t,t 



fift! A ,! rf 7' Hi 

ffi "' 1 



B 

<; ' r nl 

"ill AKI* 



. 

V"" I 1 ' 1 " 1 ""'. Mlfh. 82,. 

l"ii"f "."i" 1 ' 1 "- *>'"". 

M * llirl Ari ' (Al-'l.o; 



.. 
/,,',? i 

' ' 

A KM, 
Ht!A, 



N,,I si 'inn rum i. 



, ..wii, ,, si 'inn rum i. 

Jn"nr.' " l '.'" >l ' lp - *'"" Lynn, Mum,. 87 ,- 
f. ''I:":.. . l l '|1iit'M.m ,f Hh-nrufl ,. ,,| , , 

"on!,, ;!, ii -'- w BBt is::;;: 



AFIt, 



AI-'H, 



. 

. N. 




) Nn1 '" 1 " I'-'ni.. I'-.MI Wi.li,,,, 

'ttVL. W,?',iu 

. (A|.'HIIJ 
l "" 1lj '- 



. .i.. .,, ,.i)iin, Mmmm.. 

'"'"'. "I"-".H.;. nml in.iii.i,.,,,., ,-,.", 
.-;..,. m-.ii ..-. fm'lllt y ,,f Air r,,,r ( . '|, t 
t |-! )( ..t l-hh,,,!,,],., (inllf. K.hvunlu Al-'li; 



1 . 

.-v..!,,,,,,,,.,,, ,,f ttltftntl 



HH'I I' | niivi'i 
KnMi.n Air Mali 
AIM. tin. 

IN I.H..r WrWInu CM., Km, 
l| ,;';|' ! J 1 - I'l'-'lM.-ii.in i,f ] 
iyf.h\Al, Knii'iii'i City, 

MhlM'l.-l A Cell lAI'Mil, 

I iiHf. 

HI 



: ' 1ncl - ! ' lht " A " (1 ' finllf. 

i 1 : iv "'" Mi ' 1 '" "' iit 

"'" Atlt '- Wnrn..r- 



CHy, 



..., . 

r ,!,) t-. t ,i |,,,,it.iit 
fi.r Mimilotiiiui 



i) Air 
Al-'ll. 

!. Win. 
.if clri-- 



,. ' , 

(; ..... >triti-lli,n 



WitiK IV, Mil- 
I'-c, Nt/d.m AF11, 

IM.'KO. OnHf. ),. 

'"mi' eiiHini'vrinif Incmillvtt ]ird- 

on f<T iiri<tli|i<iliiii i.f iiniiHIIriitlon hlta 
ut'iniHi fuel imikti f,, r (, jufl nircrnft. 

Vif-V',. '!',". Aiiliil" Air Mutcrk'l 
(AM.f!) Kelly AKll, 'IVx. 

i\ N'tirih Atnrrlrnn Avlntiiin, AulonctlrN Dlv,, 
rt'Mlr''"'f 'i?'"' | B: j',' l70i;i: ! H - "v'fliiiiil iinii 



A!',!!,'"', APr ( n 1(l /, l ,'. 10 ," m CIty Ai >- Mnterll 
A iwi (AKI.C), Tinker AKll, Oltla. 

2H--Clcvclnn,| Piiflnmntlc Tool Co., Glcvulmir] 
"Wo. ?B,3II8.i!B. . 1'rodunU.m of ' H J 
Kflnr uimimiK.niH f<ir ICO-lflfi nlrcriift. 



"!,V i '^'"' . ' l "" v< " 1[l1 ' Fln ' ?l.MI.R08. 
i. , il ,'"1 .""V 1 , 1 , 1 ; <ln . Ul i "'""' i" (t wniin- 

mfiit. 1 iiirlnk Al-'lt, Fin. Air KI.IT,, !(- 
'"" Iwit HiuiiKf. rulrh-lt AKH, Kin, 
Miili-TiMiico-V.nifrlit KlertrimyHtcniH, (Ji-ci-n. 
I n' '"*' S1! '[ 1IIO ' (II) ' IWM.1I,>,,,, i . 
'' m WHiiminnl un,l ninlrol wiiU-nm. (in-cn- 

w I'.'i A !', r '"," lutl<; "' Hyfiloiiw Dlv., (AKSd), 
WvlBlit-l'iitturmm AKll, ()|,j,,. ' 

-Jk-niHx Corji., ItaUlrnorw, M.I. $LflH7.flfin 

" 11 






rl 1 . Went f.ynu, 



Wi-Ht I.vnn 



1 H ;,,, ,,, 

UH-.-I im I (!][ n hcllcoii 

Anrmniiiltn,] HyHlmii 1) v, 
WclKlit-l'iitli-nmn AKH, (H)io. '. 

-KkrlNinln (;iimniiinli>ntlnn, Inc., Hi 

IVlcMlmrn, Kin. ?1,017,H!J4 I'rodiiPtlVm 
"f uonimiiiih-nthm nnil H^/lrnnl,. ,,,[ 

}KAf ^" B ii "1 ; 

fAM.t-). 'llnlH'i- AKll, Oldri. 

IJo'-I'm Co.. M.-ntlln, Wnt.h. sn.70(M)ll() 
''""llinilMK ili>v..ln|inu>ut Hlu.ly n , ft" S 
'" [] f '"' 'I.,- MI,,,,h, 11(lH y M | ( ,Hl.. H .- 

? Air '"I':; 1 ; Hv ,"'" m " <:mm n ui, 

iiHi'i-intn AKIt, Olilu. 

Piu'itniiilli- Tool C,,., (licvolniiil 

"'- ?WIH.(.. I'nKl^tlon .y'n'V.i 

lliinilnit |[,>nr <'nm|iiiii(.ntn. tllrvrliiml 

it<irlti1 An ' a F " 



t i rrvlc 1 <: - 

, Anriiinl iiiii| 

1 Alr " Hnhtn 



r 



,,,,,.,,1 , ';. 

f V ii'/n "J 

A J ,A M^,, 111 , 11 1 ' lHi!l 

A en. (AM.(t). Tinker AT'll. (tklii. 

AcruileK. In.'.. Mlnrnl, Kin. S..|fil.(ir, 

..Vrft', 11 ' MI "i' 1 '' 1 ",? ' ll| """"ln,r nln-nift 
T' M ",",';, ;llln AiKiiiiIti Air Mule. 
H'l Ami, (AKI.O), K,,|ly AMI, 'IVx. 

rt'o'i"!'. A Jj nilh i lvi '- I'if.. Diillim. 'IV*. $2,. 
.i.HMJ.l. Ov.-rliniil iif H-HHM) n^ltinii-nllnit 
..l|-,-r[,ft ,(,,,. ,, ft ,| llHi [, lin n Al ^ 
Air Mntcrlrl AI-CII. (AKI,0). Kt-lly AKll, 

Ai-r.Mlox, Inp.. Mh.nil. |.'l n . |,o0.lfin 

1 S!'," 1 In" tan ! l 11 >iiuim im',.r 

iKliH'ii. Miiml. llttrn,n ..... if l>rnuiin>. 
"i""l nnil I'ruiliiHtlmi, If.illy AKH. T,." 



|HonnmM 1 , 1 % 
Si.Hiin.fi HI. Mmtlili-uUim (if (1 lllit i'rn 

(.rmivlllr Wnrii-p ILiMnu A r u "l,i 
Ami, (AM,!,-), Uoliln,, AMI, On. 



p I , - - 

' " l|ll ," tl(l !' "f rrimiiiiin.mil f,, P 
mivlKijtlimnl finmiiiHrrn. I,lul 
IM I i i A '"*" lllll " li; ' HyiilniMii Ulv,. <AK 3) 
WrlKliM'ttUi-riiiin AKll, (Hilo. '' 

'tenn' M nll J ril ' 1 l '"''"J!l'i'lln, Iml. II.- 



hm ,n 

N ',.. A'" "'".I"" 1 , 1 ni ''''""i" . 

,' m i A ''i n i r u !'" ( ' l Hylfiii(i rtlv., 
-), WrlKlil-|'nit (!rmm AKll, Ohio, 

"i' 1 " 1 ":'''' 1 ' Iv ISnKlneeMd ]>roitii G (n 
V lv ;- 1 AHm ..... rn, I.'nlir, ?H,H[i7,i:i;!. |'r,,- 
tliictlnii *.f cxli.rnnl fi.] innkii fur K-IOII 
rcrnft. Allininhm. Hnwnmrntw Al! 
jiloHrl Arm, (A1'[.(J). Mdlldlan AKll! 

Co.. Hentllo, WiiHli. H.SUa.BM. 
In m,||ioH ( ,r tlio 

" 









- ' 

! "' (A1 '' r ' (i| ' "I" AKH, 
, Inp., ArilnsHoii, Vn. *UHQ,. 



ncm. Annliclm. Q ff don 
A r Mutrrlel Aeon, (APLO), Hill A Fll 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 
WASHINGTON, D. C. 2O3O1 



POSTAGE AND FEES PAID 



OFFICIAL BUSINESS 



New Combat Communications Units 



The Air Force's latest development in the field of forward air 
control was unveiled during roll-out ceremonies of a new jeep- 
mounted combat communications unit at General Dynamics' Elec- 
tronics Division, Rochester, N. Y. The communications unit is a 
part of the 407L Tactical Air Control System managed by the Air 
Force Systems Command's Electronic Systems Division (ESD). 

Developed for use by forward air controllers, the highly mobile 
units will help to streamline request channels for strike aircraft 
during close air support missions. Each jeep is equipped with four 
transceivers and associated antennas mounted on a baae which can 
be removed and mounted on an armored personnel carrier or light 
truck. 

Space is also provided in the jeep for two portable, battery-oper- 
ated, manpack radio sets; one to communicate with ground troops 
and the other to direct aircraft. The jeep-mounted communications 
equipment includes four different type radios to enable forward air 
controllers to talk both to strike aircraft and to other ground 
troops. All equipment is located directly behind the vehicle seats. 

Ihe complete system with vehicle can be delivered by parachute, 
or the equipment and base can be quickly detached from the jeep 
and dropped separately. Powered by the vehicle's generator,' the 
unit can also be operated in a semi-fixed mode from an auxiliary 
power generator mounted on an accompanying trailer. 

In addition to furnishing equipment for direct air support, the 
4U7L system is developing equipment groups for aircraft control 
?? i .*l anim & air traffic control and command communications. 
Mobility, modularity and flexibility provide a capability for the 
system to operate in various locations depending on the required 
military mission. 



Georg * A ' Guy, ESD system program director, explains 
invnio a t . w .?7 ste P developmental program. The first step 
involves the acquisition of equipment presently within the state of 
the ait to provide present tactical forces with an early increase in 
1Ve two involves the development of 

ec * u i pmenta Sllch * s lightweight 
and intercept procedures, and the 
materials, components and communication tech- 



DCAA Opens 

Contract Audit 

Institute at Memphis 

The Defense Contract Auri 
Agency (DCAA) luis OHtjiblialu 
a Contract Audit Institute 
Memphis, Tonn,, lining facilitt 
of the Defense Depot, Mcniplii 
a field activity of the IMon: 
Supply Agency. 

The now educational jfiicilil 
opened June {> with n throo-ww 
course presenting technical or 
ontation in tho contract titid 
function to 00 newly employ* 
graduates of college and unive 
sity accounting Hchnota, (Joiu'H 
of various types related to coi 
tract audit; will ho conducted c 
a continuing baste for tho moi 
than 8,000 profossional mtdltoi 
of the agency. Instntctora wi 
he senior Hold nmu'tovfi < 
DCAA. 

The objective of the school i 
to advance the technical aiwl ai 
mlnistrutiyo proflcioncy of coi 
tract auditors through coins* 
developed from on-thc-aito siliii 
tiona and caso studies, nnd I 
provide a training- medium I 
adapt new auditing conceits I 
DCAA audit assignments. ; 

DCAA is now rcsponHible ti 
audit of contracts performed b 
more than 4,000 business entej 
prises, universities nnd oth^ 
institutions. It is the only itgenc 
with which defense contractor 
deal concerninff contract nudl 
matters, ; 





ftNT SECRETARY OF 
JE-PUBLIC AFFAIRS 



IN THIS ISSUE 

Analysis and Cost IWeciiveness 



naiuiinK 

ractive 

tion f Today's Idea* into Tomonu.wV, Weapon Systems 
<.'"> llu- Aerospace Industry Mcl Uolialiilily Rcquirt-mcnlH for 

fllnniu'il Hpnce KllRhl? 
K.I.I 1 . Reduction in Piuionvork 

^"'iB'i Military Sales anI P ura l 11IHra Thn>i 1K h Calendar Year 1 
DEPARTMENTS 
About I Von In 
HpculuTH Calcndiir 
MwllnffH and SympOHin 
I''nnn (lie S|ji'alTH Rostrum 



<'nlcndar n( Kvcnts , 




18 
25 

28 



8 
11 
12 
2(i 
32 
iM 



A.I iek on niiffi. 27 by Mr. Clyde Bolhmer, Kxccullve Secretary, Defense 

IiduHlry Adv.ory Council, covers actions b c ln lakon l,y ,e c, o 

)epart. n( and other interested r M | M ons to reduce the 

burden on defense coiilrnclorM and mibcoiHraclorn. 



To Reorganize Subordinate Units 

Secretary of the Anny Stanley It. liesor has approved an Army 
Materiel Command reorganization that will allVet lour snbimlinalr 
units. 

The shufllo calls for the phase out of tiio U.S. Army Mobility 
Command at Warren, Mich. As a result of I ho dearlivalinn, the Mo- 
bility Connnand's three opi-ratiiw unils, tho Army Tank- Automotive 
Center, Warren; the Army Aviation Materiel Command and Army 
Mobility Fquipmont Center, both in SI. Louis. M<>., will luromc 
separate elements roportinK dirodly fit Army Materiel Command 
headquarters in Washington, D.C. 

Of tho 180 civilian employees of the Anny Mobility Cmimiand 
about 170 will be absorbed by the Army TanU-Aulomntivo. Center, 
Tho others will be, oll'ered positions with Hie Army Aviation Mali 1 
riol Command, (he Army Mobility Kquiptuonl Center, or with other 
subordinate elements. 

The reorj.vani'/atinn schedule, wliicli calls for Ihe dearlivatiou of 
the Mobility Command by January MM'iY. bejvan A up;. 1 when tin- 
Army Aviation Materiel Command and the Army Mobility Kquip 
inent Center became individual commands under their previous 
commanding' generals, 

When the transition is complete, the Army Tank Anloinntivr 
Center will be re-established as the Tank -Automotive Command 
under tbe direction of Major (leneral \V. \V. hapsley, who now 
heads the Mobility Command. llriKadinr (loneral \V. .1. Durn-n 
born'or, present Army Tank-Automotive Center eommander will In- 
come, Deputy Commander uf tin; Army Tank-Auloinot ivo ( 'oinmand. 



Air Force Reorganizes 
Tactical Air Command Centers 

An Air Komi reorjvani/.alioii of Taotiea! Air Command i-onloni 
has I'osulted in the establishment of a Taetiral Airlift, Ci'uh'r at 
Pope AKH, N. ('., and eslablislmient of a Tactical KitfhliM 1 WCUIIOUM 
Ctmlor at Nollis A Kit, Nov. The new et'iiter.'i will miiiimi/i 1 tempo 
rary assiKimiont of personnel and equipment which are nnl avail- 
able for normal mission durinn' temporary duty |iorindn, 

Tho Tactical Airlift Center in collocatiMl with an airlift wintf uf 
Pope AKI1 and next to tho Army's XVIII Airborne Corps ami tho 
H2nd Airborne Division at Fort HraKK. This location will aid cit 
ordination of Army and Air Force (esliiiK f equipment, and the 
development of tactics and techniques used in lramq>i>rlim,' and 
msupplyhitf Army and Air Force troops hy tactical aircraft. 

At Nellis AFH the innv 'I'aetical FiRhler Weaponn (Mentor will be 
tho utfoncy which will identify pniblcm unsiw, test now equipment 
and develop new combat tactics for ladical IlKhlers. Combat, crew 
traininj-' and fiKhtor weapons school classes prcsimtly c.tmducted at 
Nellis will coutinuo under the supervision of tin 1 , center. 

TJndcr the roortfani/.ation of tho centc,r, tho Taclioal Air Het-nn- 
muHsanco Center, Shaw AFU, S, ('., will oxpand operational teslinK 
and evaluation of tactics and equipment used in tactical reconnais- 
sanco aircraft. At Ktflin Al' 1 !!, Fla., the Tactical Air War faro 
Center will continue Losts and evaluation uf comltat-improvinK 
projects which require specialised facilitien of the Air Foreo S,V,H- 
tems Command available at the base. No change is conlcmphilcrt* in 
the Special Air Warfare Center, 




I'tihlitthcd liy Hie Ili'iinrlmcnt 

iil 1 DciViiHo 
Hun. Hubert H. 

llmi. I'yiii't U. 



ty HiM-rclitry of l)(;fi>iiflc 
lltiu. Arlliur Sylvi'titcr 

An'ilntiini Si'i'n'diry of Defme 

(PnhlU- AfTnlnO 
t'nl. ,I.M'l H. Sli'iihnm, I'MA 

IHirilni fin Coiiiimtnily Huliidniin 
Col. 1>M!ii ('. (iihmiii, USA 

Chlt'l, Itu'ilni'iiM \ Lulmr Oivlnlo)i 

l-Milnr .. I .(Mr. K. W. Ilradforil, USN 
An'.nr, I'MKiii- ........ Ml 'in Cct'llln 1'ollok 

Atiniii'. I'lilllur ..... Mr, HU'lt Ln 1'nlce 

Kitlloiiitl Aiiiilnliiiit 

Nninuih ];. Wurra, JOI, USN 

'('lie !>' (< ii'ir hi'innti'H Hulldin 
]! pnl>1i!ijii>ii niMiitlily liy l,ii<! II n HI ness 
,C- l.nlmr IHvini ..... IllnTtitnilo for 
t'.HUMiiiiilty U-'tiilliimi, OlUcii of t)io 
Aii'iinisint IliTivliiry uf iJi'finnm (I'ltli- 
Mi- Atl'(ilnt). I'm' "I fundu for 
thin intl'lli'uli'Mi \viiti ii|i|iniv<!il liy 
hlm-lnr uf i>t Uiir-'iiii nf tint 

'I'lit* |no jiMii.i ni' OKI //iillnd'n IB 

t<i n*Tvi! Mil it iiii'iinii uf I'nniltHllllcatioll 
Ulwi-Kit (lin lli'|iiu'tiii''lir (if IKiffiHM 
1 1 in It) met II 'i aiilliuri/.nl nKtiiicifs 
ami i|i-l'.-ii!;i- I'unh'iu-tnrii nnil oilier 
Initiiiu-iri inh-n'jilii, II, will iii'i'vo ns 1 
;i unltl" t' iiiiltliih-y r 
cliil |iulli'li' ! s, iii'MjiViiintt ami 
iiixl -ill >'!. tu 
iiii-int'iTii nf Ho- i 

iti linlviiiK tin- iiniMi -inn tliul my ftri 
in ftiinitlniT Ui" m|itin'itnmt-H of IM 
IHIII, 

Miiittrliil i.t HIM Ituthlhitote 
l.'.l.'.l tu nii]i|-ly ii.-HiiH'iiL HiirliiKfllllcd 
littii uf im.-rn.t tu tin* liiiHincNH com- 

miinily, HiiKH'-'tli"" 11 tvim l" 1 ' 118 "^ 
n'lu'i'.'ictimiivi-'i fur lupli'H li tin cov- 
urnl in I'liliirc limiit'H li(ml(l m for- 
wunl-'it IM DM* IliiHliicjw A I-w 



Ititlh'tin in tlifllrllmtctl witjout 
''i't'li iiu.ntli t*t H'liwmn ftHvM 
ttirltiiiiry mid t MKfiirlcH of the uv. 
|iHrlipittiin(ft'iim'. Anny, Navy 
Air FttiTt*. Hfi|iii'Ht* fur ro|ito if 

IIP Itlltlrt'MHl'tl In till' HllHilll'HH 



Tlu- lViit4iK, W 

atumi, 14-ii'iifimtf, oxftn-a 

C^iit**nl nf (lie intiKitwiin lft V JJ 
i-i'iiriiUi'.! fm-ly wllltnut rlc8W| 
t. Mention of tho flourcowii! 




by 
Russell Murray II 



I am not enough of a historian to 
speak authoritatively as to the exact 
moment when systems analysis tech- 
niques were introduced into the de- 
fense business. But it is clear that the 
kind of questions addressed by systems 
analysis activities have been around 
for some time. For example, in Rich- 
ard Hough's hook, "Dreadnought," 
there appears the following- extract 
from a report by Lieutenant Com- 
mander Sims to President Theodore 
Roosevelt at the turn of the century, 
concerning American battleship con- 
struction policy: 

"The final conclusion is, that 
for the sum that it would cost to 
maintain the twenty small battle- 
ships, we would maintain a fleet 
of ten large ones that would be 
greatly superior in tactical quali- 
ties, in effective hitting capacity, 
speed, protection, and inherent 
ability to concentrate its gunfire, 
and have a sufficient sum left 
over to build one 20,000-tou bat- 
tleship each year, not to mention 
needing fewer officers and men to 
handle the more efficient fleet." 

Though battleship construction pol- 
icy is not our problem today, the 
whole tone of that quotation the 
framing of the issue, the relationship 
between cost and effectiveness has a 
remarkable ring of familiarity for to- 
day's systems analyst. 

With the advent of World War II, 
the demand for activities in the gen- 
eral area of systems analysis grew 
sharply, and the groundwork was 
laid for its growth in the post-war 
period, Though the area of interest in 
World War II was narrowed by the 
urgencies of the situation, the intent 
was really no different than it is today. 
At that time, the emphasis was 
naturally on maximizing the effec- 
tiveness of existing forces; whereas, 
in the post-war era, the analysis could 
consider longer-ranged alternatives 
with significant differences in cost 
implications. Systems analysis began 
to expand from considerations of what 
we could do with what we had on 
hand at the moment to what we could 
do with what we might elect to have 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



on hand in the future. Throughout 
this period, assuring the efficient uti- 
lization of resources in the DOD be- 
came progressively more difficult as a 
result to coin a phrase of mush- 
rooming technology. The bewildering 
array of entirely feasible alternative 
forces which our scientists can offer 
today has enormously complicated our 
problems of choice. There is hardly a 
military task which cannot be accom- 
plished in a multitude of ways and 
many capabilities which we take for 
granted today have been wholly im- 
possible over most of the span of mili- 
tary history. We cannot hedge against 
this array of possibilities by simply 
buying them all. To attempt to do so 
would only lead to squandering of re- 
sources on partially completed pro- 
grams. Choices have to be made, and 
the aim of systems analysis is to help 
in making those choices correctly. 

Just what systems analysis consists 
of is difficult to put into a few words, 
for it really is a blend of many things, 
and it draws on many of the formal 
disciplines. Wo do find, however, that 




Russell Murray II serves as Dep. 
Asst. Secretary of Defense for Gen- 
eral Purpose Programs (Systems 
Analysis). Mr. Murray, who has 
worked as a missile flight test engi- 
neer, joined DOD in 1962 as a con- 
sultant. Before assuming his present 
post in December 1965 he was Dep. 
Comptroller for General Purpose 
Forces. 



economics is one of the most useful 
of the disciplines, since the core of 
systems analysis work centers on the 
economic problem of the efficient al- 
location of resources. Charles Hitch 
and Roland McKean, in their book 
"Economics of Defense in the Nuclear 
Age/' had this to say on the subject: 

"The economic problem is~~to 
choose that strategy, including 
equipment and everything else 
necessary to implement it, which 
is most efficient (maximizes the 
attainment of the objective with 
the given resources) or economi- 
cal (minimizes the cost of achiev- 
ing the given objective) the 
strategy which is most efficient 
also being the most economical. 

"Strategy and cost are as in- 
terdependent as the front and 
rear sights of a rifle. One cannot 
assign relative weights to the im- 
portance of the positions of the 
front and rear sights. It does 
not make sense to ask the correct 
position of the rear sight except 
in relation to the front sight and 
the target. Similarly one cannot 
economize except in choosing 
strategies (or tactics or methods) 
to achieve objectives. The job of 
economizing, which some would 
delegate to the budgetcers and 
comptrollers, cannot be distin- 
guished from the whole task of 
making military decisions." 

Much of the systems analysis work 
in the Defense Department utilizes an 
approach that is familiar to the econo- 
mist. Nonetheless, it also involves con- 
siderations familiar to the engineer, 
the mathematician, the statistician and 
other professions. But one thing which 
it does not do is substitute for the 
decision maker. On the contrary, the 
whole aim is to present the decision 
maker with the clearest possible pic- 
ture of what bis choices really are 
what each will do, when it will do it, 
and what it will cost, It also attempts 
to point out the uncertainties to show . 
what it would mean if uncertain key 
assumptions were changed, and to give 
a feeling for which factors are critical 
and which are not. To sort out those 
issues, to bring them into the open, 
to establish a forum for discussion 
along orderly lines, systems analysis 
has been found a useful tool in the 
Defense Department. 

Systems analysis was formally 
introduced in DOD in 1961 when 
Charles Hitch, formerly the head of 
the Economics Department at The 
Rand Corporation, was appointed 
Comptroller. Within bis organization, 
a systems analysis office was estab- 
lished at the level of a directorate. In 
1962, this group had expanded and its 



hcml, l>r. Alain Knlhiivi'n, wan tip- 
polnli'il Di'puly Assistant Sem-lary 
of IVlVuse. With mliliUoiml .li'imiuds 

h,.huv l>hi<'<'d (111 llli;i l ' r " U| ' 1 aml wilh 
analysis hfiiiK apiilicil '" '"''i'' 1 '" 1 - 



olliei', together with the existiii|', nwl 
csliinalinn facility, wan split frnm lh<' 
Onniplrnlli'r'n ollln- and eslulilished as 
n new ullli'i' nt the li-vrl of Aiinislanl 
SeereUiry nf Del'i'MW thin level, of 
course, re|inr1ini';diri'dly I" Hi' 1 :ill< ' n '- 
lury of Defense. 

The Ollle.e of the Assistant Seen- 
lary of DeiVmie (Systems Analysis) 
OASD(SA) 'in nn'.iiniy.ed Intn live 

n :; imi for j'.oneral piirpn.'i.' pm 

KniMui; u third I'nr resourn 1 analysis 
(ineludiiiK cn;i|, ealinml inn and man 
power iT(|iiireiiii'nl:0 ; n fourth IW 
irnnnnih' iHialysia; and n IH'tli I'm 1 
romiiianil, rnnlrol, emnniunicalinnii ami 

'I'll- nUlee ill rlnsely illh'Krale.l wilh 
til INT aelivil It'll within tile Ollin< of I he 
.Secrelliry uf Dcl'em:-. l-'or esample, 
for expert, jiiivin 1 ami analysis of terli 
nnln(.',ieal nuilti'i'ji, we rely mi the Of 
lire of the Din-riot 1 of OefeilJie Hi" 
,'ieiireh and Miic.iin'i'riitf, 1 . I'W mailers 
relulini', 1 to proiluelinn lii'heduliru-. 1 pun 

rely nn the OlhVe of the Ansliilanl, 
J-ierrelnrv nf Defence ( I n si a I la I ion n 
iiml I,o|'.l)ilH'!0. And, of I'mirm-, we 
work very i'lo:u-ly wilh I lie IVrvlt'e;i 
ainl the Joint, Clili'f.-i nf Stall'. I would 
lilu! In refer hrl'-tly In thi., relalimi. 



A piii'linn ill 1 tin 1 iiiutlylii'iil W"i'l( 
in HOD iloi'ii t.aki' plarr \vllliln 
OASD(SA) priipi-r, llowi-vi-r, liy I'm' 
Uu> liu'Ki'fi!. 1'nn'linn nf lln> uiiiilytii'nl 
I'lfiul iii t'oiiilucli'il by, nr unil'-r 111' 1 
ni'Kiii (if, tin- .Si'rvin-.'i and llic -Ininl 
Cliicfn nl 1 SI nil', In any [Ingram an 
ovcrwlHdiniiurly law " Uwl f HOD, 
tlH> np|)nr(uiiitl<'!i I'm 1 analymii ai'<' fm' 
licynml lint pliyninil rap!ii'il,y nl' 
OAHD(SA), unil nur funclluii In m>1 
In iinniluct all, nl' even an lip|in-rlalili' 
fnirlinn, of thii nnalyiii'n thai, allVcl 
our ilcfi'iinc planninK- Uatlier, nno of 
our inajnr fvincUonn In In tuiKi 1 ; 1 '-*! I" 
Uii! Henrnlary of Hi^eniit' llinin 1 uveiiii 
in wltitih nnulyjiiH wuultl lie pnilUnlile, 
i.u., ansits ntla|)U>il to iiiwlynlii. Tln> 
ry tlicn ninniilerH nur I'l'rnni-- 
uiiil, Ci'imi liini! tn lime, 
uHtu tliii .S<!t'vU:<!K or tin; -Joint 
Ohinfn of SlalT to comUirt HimlywH. 
At Hint point, din' fui)Rlio l)t't!oimn 



nn ' wurliine. rlor.-lv wilh Hi,- study 

myarm.alion:'. If we ran, Wt- will vv.u'1% 
wilh I In- |'.i''M"< i" :'l"''li"r I""'"' 1 
Ih'iiivu of ni-ril aii'l ri-ili-n:t. :ni'l "'; 

Vill try I" l"'ll ( will) lhl ' l ' ll " |r 

, l!ii)1)n ip1i"liii. Ahnvi- all, w.- IH ivy lo 
nniKr tiiiiv thai (he analyi- MI-- -ii 
reeled al'Mtl 1 , lill-:i wllii'li will lit' 1- 
iniilii'ive li> the ! ir'rrehu )''.' Hi 1 ' 1 '! , 

h, .,. iiir.liuir'-!'. Ihi".' aimly '" 
w ill he I'nmllli'ted hv lh- niihtitiy 
t,talV;i. In "lll.'i:,, llifV will I"' "'" 
| nn'1-d mil I" urj-.ani'-iilii'n 1 ' -'"''h il ! 
Hiiml, I lie t'eol'T ini 1 Nitvsil Aniiiy:.) --, 

'['1,,,,11-h mil all r.liiiHei. M'.|niv.- H. H 
i:i e,-n-rally nl thi:> ''lai:- Ilia' li>|(ii!-! 
nf vai'inmi Uill'hi me iinii-llnl li"in 
imllDiliy mid, ill i.uiii,- -a:-., nuhlilii 
may rumlin'1 ;i]ici'inli.'i -i\ iiu.1i."' lui 

lli,.'variuu:i S-ivio-. 1 will Imv.- in 

|n -say hil-l' ahinif Hi- l"|.' I h'-lf 1 . '- 
iniltlnlry run (day in thi- pm. -.-,-, ., 

\Vli.-n (tie; imli'-' av- Md-mHli"! '" 

,| 1( , M.-eivhiry "t l>.-f.-n->.- ( nAShi.'lAi 
piirlii'ipuli" 1 i" I'u'lr ""> i'' u ', In ih i > 
t'linrtiuit, we rMimitii' (h' p ''loilif* Hi 
detail, lliid iiifni'in lh- .S.-n.-laiv a. 
1,, nur iVrlhitv* "i 1 1" 'h"ii 'alt'iily, 
what ii'-w iurminaliun hit^ )>i m uu 
ruver-d, what ihnt impll'' ; ' f'" 1 'h' 1 
hlturi', anil whal t> wmil-l 1 1 r.nniiii-n.l 
in iluil lichl wilh n-,|u-, I In.tli I" 
rhan|H'i> in il-'f-tu-i- planninj: and th<- 

u I fur any fuilh'-i nMiily -' ;, 

I thinH ynit nliMiild !" itt'l- '" HP 
pi'ri'iali- l'i'"in ihirt llmt (li- n-- "f ; ,', : 
li'insi iiimlymn Irrhlilipie't in IIHH htm 

i f ii|;e. ll li"W Ifii.'i ("(fitiii- u v, itv 

of life; il-i ililhli'lire run It" vny 
t'.l-al. IIIKl nl'lni I:., Mill h- fulr I hnvr 

thin pninl, li-l me lutMrH 1" *'l'l thai 
allh'iUi-Ji lh- value t.f :,n-li ifi-hni'tU' 



whi.'h ai- inuiv in- h>nn iml)J nc t to 
mi;ily:-i;'. Tlin:,, Ih-re will m-ct-Hsuvily 

thi'. i'-it-.nii alum-, we riiinu.t v\\\?.?_\ 
a |i;inai'i'a. Hut e\-n if an eutil'i' JSHIU 
,'iiiiMol I..- re:..i|v,-l Ihruiii-.h analysis 
il i. inipuilanl lu r-ali/.r Hint (ivpn 
liil '.'.lii.lt ran In- -uiilidi'iitly <umly/.p( 
uinl in1' i |u i-l-il i i-muve!i mil' inori! lij 
it!' HIM -i I !iin! v I rum (tie lining o 
inaKinr. a >'huir-, 

Second , lu vii il ite nf (lie I'HiiU'ci 
ama i>ni louiuliiii; Mir woril "llliiilyiiis, 
i ii up led till llie furl (hut mmlyxc 
in- i ondiii'li'il hy huiinin hellion \vj| 
Iniiumi lallinivi. the line nf minlyll 
Ii'i'hliiiine'i pieeilU U'i will) a jllltvi 
(In! hil/urd, in nell ll't a |)tik'iilli 
liflli'lil I ilu n! rutrd'li'l' thill 11 Vllli 

jiimlv-.r ,, fur (lit* Im/anhi nf inni-illlli 
> -.i-, iu - l"itr KM-nl'-i 1 , Hut. it iltli'li Illd 
.-lit.- thai Hi- upiuuarh In iilliilyii 
mu::l ni'V-v hi' .'ifiiuil il, in n tool < 

(M ,'llt pl-U.'l , illll] il llllltll 111' ll'Oilt 1 

v. ilh iv.pi'i-l 

* 'I'lu- third point i" Ihnt H)'Hlui 

ittiiMi r:ririn'e. An nil eMtlilplit, Uteri! 

n ,. :;( ;Mi.t;il '! liH'Ul'iil nl" -VllhllllillK I 

mitii. a v MI fh nl' a la.-lli'al uli'i'ii 



Illelr litnittltinil:! have ll! hrt-li (Ht 

imtteli. Kvcry pen.'iu wim '.v.nh'i v/ilh 
or iintKeii Uiii* "f i>yc.liiii< JIM!*]"*' it.- 
|ei'hnii|Ht"i In Hn- "ItU'i- nf ilu' Jirfn- 
lury of llefrli;ie iiifltlitiiit 'he i'l-cn- 
laiy lliiiii.elf hi MWui'- nf Ihe Iiml 
litllnmi, If mtohl I"- w.tilhwhlh 1 
lin-lilinniliK I"" 1 ' "^ ''"' inin - ilni'"i' 
lant imeH, 

l-'h-M, itnnlytli'it! (t'cluiiiiiii-w tire not 
a (Hiimrcn, There will uhvy he mn- 
jiiili'i'Mliniiii whifh lii-sn 1 nn lh" vi' i y 
fmnhimeiiUihi nf nuliMtml tt'-frtei" 
which ace i. imply nt Mlj''e( l-i mty 
Mtii't tif riuni'miii, f|tutnlitidive uiiiily- 
iiiii. it i nnt rvim pniMiilth- tM iliiiw H 
Hue hetween lluute \vliieh Hl'i- iiml 
thnne which un* not On- M "*'>' *'" 
it wi-allh nf t-MiiiiiilenUtnini 



. , 

ir.-i \v>, A. .'..nliniily, il i;i iin-vitu 

Iliat jll<i|:inrn! I'" iltvnlvi-il ill tl"'t 
inlninu h-'.v it..: iun>ly;,i:i ullitll In 1 f 
iluflfl, Tin- MI t --I" analyiiiil Vi't|Hl 
iM^in^ hiieiit 1 ! iiiiil, tr* any nit, it 
(1 ,-iiV,-|,',i i.nly (lilMil!-h i^pi'l'li'lll'i 

Fiiiall), nu the foililli imlill, 
,,tl. nf Ihr niml> Unil iirl IH In 
t-nrly riliun- nf i|e\<'lnpnii'l, "i" 1 ( 
mil) K-i.-iitly (lint the \\w f ' 
lvti.nl liulniit(U'''i lut'i ItcHiin In I 
n innjnr t-ffi-ct it mir ih'fi-'iiw hi 
IMIV. Ai irut'l. we have du 1 i 
,,,...^ ^.hl.'h HM- itni'iml'l 



nn 



in V 



,, ( , 

r..r uilyK >"",. "f whirl 

, ( ,.-i,n..ii.'i tMi-ii.T iy "' 

' nrt 1 -' 1 " 



,^p,.,iein'.' l!i" licit they nflrii 
t.i i>m law it U'V.'I t" l>vo a w 



Suptombor 



is located next to the decision maker, 
a where it can be responsive to his needs 
and aware of his problems. We find 
this to be the case in the Office of the 
Secretary of Defense, and I see no 
reason why it should not be equally 
true elsewhere. 

On the other hand, I would not 
not want to give you the impression 
that systems analysis techniques are 
useful only at the highest levels. It is 
equally useful to decision makers on 
all levels as well aa during- all the 
chronological stages in the develop- 
ment- of weapon systems. After all, 
what this sort of activity attempts to 
do is to reduce the uncertainties in- 
volved in making choices between al- 
ternatives. It is clear that choices arc 
necessary not only for the user of 
military hardware, but also for the 
supplierthe prime contractors, the 
subcontractors and even the compo- 
nent specialists. 

Furthermore, choices must be made 
continually ns any given weapon sys- 
tem is developed, not only the basic 
decison to embark on the project, but 
later as the "paper" design is trans- 
lated into hardware; still later, how 
to employ the system to best advan- 
tage and, in many cases, how to mod- 
ify the system to take advantage of 
new technology or to extend its useful 
service life, 

Thus, with choices to be made on 
all levels on a continuing basis, and 
not just at tho "top," it is clear that 
the opportunities for benefiting from 
analytical techniques are cxtrnmoly 
wide, It is for this reason that the 
generation of additional numbers of 
qualified analysts and further de- 
velopment of the art of analysis 
holds so much promise. 

I would like to conclude by address- 
ing the role that industry can play 
in this procaus, and I can think of 
at least throe possibilities. 

The first concerns a problem that 
we run into at the very earliest stages 
in the genesis of a new weapon sys- 
tem, Too often in tho past, the re- 
quirement for a new weapon system 
lias been stated in terms of rigid 
performance specifications. For ex- 
ample, the "requirement" will state 
that^a new aircraft must have some 
specific payloa<l, range, ceiling and 
speed capability; it must carry par- 
ticular kinds of equipment Which 
weigh just ao much and do certain 
things; it must weigh no more than 
certain specified .amount, and so 



Industry Bulletin 



on. T.h, s sort of rig i( | performance 
specification may we ll be useful or 
oven essential (though I have moro to 
say about this later) when the problem 
is to move one particular system into 
the hardware stage. But there is a 
very different problem which should 
bo settled first: to select one particu- 
lar system from among all the alter- 
native systems which could also ac- 
complish the specific military task 
Before we can even get to the con- 
tract definition phase, we need to 
analyze and compare the alternatives 
and this requires a far greater scope 
and flexibility than that provided by 
ii rigid performance specification. 

In the future, as in the past, the 
genesis of a weapon system will be 
marked by, and depend on, a bright 
idea in somebody's head. We will never 
find a substitute for that, though 
analysis can help guide our thoughts 
to where the bright ideas are wait- 
ing. The subsequent task is to subject 
the bright idea to the test of analy- 
sis in the form of a study, probably 
conducted under the auspices of one 
of the Services. At this point, what 
is needed is something which I be- 
lieve industry is, or should be, ideally 
suited to provide: a catalog, if you 
will, of the kinds of alternative sys- 
tems which could be made available. 
I do not mean a catalog without lim- 
its. Just how wide a range of alterna- 
tives that catalog should encompass 
would be determined by the Service 
organization reponsible for the sys- 
tems analysis. That same organization 
would also have to decide how many 
different industrial firms should be 
solicited for such catalogs, and wheth- 
er that should be done on a contracted 
basis. 

On each page of that sort of cata- 
log would be a description of one par- 
ticular alternative: how long it would 
bo before we could have it in serv- 
ice; some estimate of the techno- 
logical risks involved; what its per- 
formance characteristics would be 
(including not only such things as 
range, speed and payload, but also 
reliability and maintainability) ; what 
its costs would be to develop, to pro- 
duce and to maintain and .operate. 
Let me hasten to add that, at this 
stage in the development of a new 
system, the emphasis would be on 1 
covering a wide range of alternatives 
rather than on examination in detail. 
Conventional design procedures 
leave' much to be .desired for this 



sort of activity. If each of a wide 
range of alternative systems hn.s to 1m 
aid out in detail, with every nut and 
1'olt in place, the time and cost in- 
volved in developing such a cutulog 
would he prohibitive. What is needed 
instead, is the development of nP w 
techniques for parameterized design. 
In this respect, my impression is 
that the aircraft manufacturers are 
ahead of most of the rest of industry. 
They use a technique called "rubber- 
ized design" which allows them, with- 
out even getting near to a drafting 
table, to stretch or shrink the various 
characteristics of a new aircraft de- 
sign this way and that increasing or 
decreasing the take-off distance, the 
range, the payload, the speed, finding 
out what this means in terms of size 
or gross weight, and so on and doing 
this all on a rapid and, I might add, 
surprisingly accurate basis. It has 
taken time to develop this facility, 
and I would like to see it applied more 
widely for such catalog-building pur- 
poses. In addition to the rapid pre- 
diction of technical characteristics, a 
similar facility is needed for the pre- 
diction of costs. Both depend, of 
course, on historical analyses of ear- 
lier systems. A good deal of effort is 
now going into this sort of work, as 
I am sure you are aware, and I cannot 
overemphasize to you its importance 
to us. 

The role that potential prime con- 
tractors would play in this building 
of catalogs is fairly clearthey would 
describe possible types of aircraft, 
ships, missiles and other major sys- 
tems. The role played by the supplier 
of components, on the other han d, 
would seem to me to be in support 
either of the prime contractor or of 
the Military Service responsible for 
the systems analysis, with the com- 
ponent supplier's role becoming in- 
creasingly important as the gross 
characteristics of the new system be- 
gin to evolve, 

The concept behind this develop- 
ment of catalogs is to allow a rational 
analysis of the alternatives. Before 
we can decide whether we should sim- 
ply modernize the systems we already 
have, or whether we should build new 
ones, and, if so, what their character- 
istics should be, we need to know what 
the choices really are. We use systems 
analysis to help decide among these 
alternatives, or to suggest even bet- 
ter ones, but we cannot 'begin to apply 

(Continued on Page 20) 



Defense contractors doing business 
with the Navy can look forward to 
more expeditious award of clearly de- 
fined contracts. Through increased 
emphasis on better procurement plan- 
ning Navy business will become move 
attractive to defense contractors. This 
will be made possible through the 
NElvy 's new Advance Procurement 
Planning System (APPS). _ 

The keystone of the new APPb ih 
the integration of contract considera- 
tions into the early weapon system 
planning cycle. The new system rest* 
on two key principles: First, earlier 
procurement planning, intimately 
linked with early program planning; 
and second, a shift of responsibility 
for procurement planning from the 
supporting staff officials (contracting 
officers) to the actual system acquisi- 
tion manager. 

Under APPS the hardware man- 
ager must broaden his planning effort* 
to include not only the uaunl onffi- 
noorniR and logistics aspects, hut also 
the economic and contractual aspects. 
He must focus his attention not only 
on the final product but on how it will 
lie obtained in the market place. Thus, 
the weapon systems planners are not 
planning in an "Ivory tower" but are 
proceeding with a practical eye to- 
ward what they want and how they 
will get it most effectively mid eco- 
nomically through the medium of the 
contract. 

The trouble with the old approach. 
Vice Admiral I. J. Galantto, Chief of 
Naval Material said, is that engineer- 
ing and logistic plans are greatly in- 
fluencedeven thwarted, in extreme 
cases- by eventual purchasing re- 
quirements, over which the manager 
has little control. Conversely, pur- 
chasing may be "locked in," made in- 
flexible, by engineering decisions made 
in a vacuum. As a result, the eventual 
contract may be advantageous neither 
to the contractor nor the Government. 
To correct this, the Nnvy intends to 
introduce procurement considerations 
much earlier, .even in the R&D plan- 
ning phase and concept formulation 
phase, and is publishing procedural 
guidelines to be sure that it is done. 
The new APPS does not affect the 
Navy's organization at all it's just 



uy 
Cant. Joseph L. Howard, SC, USN 

a matter of the same people doing the 
same things at different times. The 
Navy contracting Officer will, for ex- 
ample, begin thinking about the con- 
tractual approach much earlier in the 
weapon acquisition planning process. 
Likewise, the program planner will bo 
thinking from the outset about ^the 
contract document as the medium 
through which he clearly communi- 
cates his requirements to the con- 
tractor. 

The new 'system also reduces ad- 
ministrative procurement leadtimo 
through the concurrent consideration 
of both technical and procurement 
factors and by combining internal 
approval and procurement planning 
procedures. 

The implications to defense industry 
suppliers are significant. The reduc- 
tion in administrative procurement 
leadtime means Unit industry can look 
forward to earlier consummation of 
contracts. For example, contractors 
competing in contract definition 
(CD) will have a broader indication 
of what the Government visualizes in 
the program, both in terms of the 
requirement itself as well as the type 
of contractual arrangement contem- 
plated. Contract terms could be 
worked out during the competition 
phase of CD and give a more complete 




Cunt. Joseph L. Howard, SC, USN, 
a veteran Navy Supply Corps officer 
with 26 years service, serves as Asst. 
Chief of Navnl Material (Procure- 
ment) and Director of Procurement, 
OfikV of Asst. Secretary of the Navy 
(Installations and Logistics) He is 
author of a newly published book 
titled "Our Modern Navy, 



basis for source selection. Carried b 
its ultimate, selection of source COL" 
be immediately folio-wed by signir; 
what is already a definitive imlrj- 
ment insofar as each competitor i- 
concerned. 

Participation in Navy contracts ift"I" 
also be more attractive because tf.r 
new APPS gives developers n 1>eU 
chance at first production runs. AFP; 
also is aimed at stimulating 
competition initially for co 
awards. Coupled with the develop^/ 
first production approach is a *?* 
guard to assure that technical ih*.i 
are adequate to facilitate comptiitiv: 
procurement for later follow-wi pro- 
duction.. 

Timely advance procurement pi- 
ning will also increase compelstb 
through greater use of two-step i-: 
mal advertising, rather than in-got;* 
tion, as a method of procurement, h 
a similar manner, the new system v.-. , 
make possible the increased use t'j 
life-cycle contracting and, fterrij. 
help reduce maintenance and syjj-:; 
costs. 

The gains for defense contractcs 
from this more precise anil mip:* 
hensivo kind of program plmmtng s:. 
many. Reduced administrative Ui!- 
time means more timely contract;. 
Better planning meam closer re- 
quirements spelled out in conhKU 
Source selection becomes cnsier. P- 
velopers will have a belter chance f:i 
first production business. CnmpclLtsi 
will bo improved among nuiilifkd c;r> 
paniea. Technical data, a peipsW 
problem, will be more clearly ilefta. 
Improvements in contracting niethw 
such as two-stop formal adverhtTI 
and multi-year procurement, will * 
routinely exploited by plan ttta 
than by helter-skelter "add-ons i 
the late procurement stages. 

To the defense Industry, the Natf 
new APPS means more otlwtr 
business opportunities that lend lt 
selves to better planning Tor the w 
nation of plant capacity. Vice Adr-J 
Galantin confidently expects that.* 
members of the Defenaa-induslry fc 
will teneftt, Industry will Bftin f 
more orderly plannhiB-the Navy I 
obtain better material, sooner '- 



September tf 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Townsend Hoopes has been ap- 
pointed Principal Dep. Asst. Secretary 
of Defense (International Security 
Affairs) succeeding Adam Yarmolin- 
slty, who is leaving Government serv- 
ice. 

VAdm. Klcber S. Masterson, USN, 
has turned over command of the U.S. 
Second Fleet to VAdm. Bernard A. 
Clarey and assumed the post of Direc- 
tor, Defense Weapons Systems Eval- 
uation Group. 

Maj. Gen. William T. Smith, USAF, 
became Chief of Staff, Defense Com- 
munications Agency Aug. 1, succeed- 
ing Brig. Gen. James H. Weiiicr, 
USAF, who has retired. 

Maj. Gen. Ethan A. Chapman, USA, 
has been reassigned as Commanding 
General, Western Region, NORAD, 
headquartered at Hamilton AFB, 
Calif. He relieves retiring Mai. Gen. 
Andrew R. Lolli, USA. 

Brig. Gen. John D. Crowley, USA, 
succeeds Brig. Gen. Raymond C. Con- 
roy, USA, as Commander, Western 
Area, Military Traffic Management 
and Terminal Service, Oakland, Calif. 
Brig. Gen. Thomas L. Hayes, 
USAF, has been appointed to the post 
of Dep. Commander for Management 
nnd Systems, Military Traffic Manage- 
ment and Terminal Service. 

Col. Joel B. Stephens. USA, has as- 
sumed the position of Director for 
Community Relations, Office of Aqst. 
Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs). 
He replaces Col. Julian B. Cross, 
USAF, deceased. 

Capt. Frank Larsen, USN, has been 
appointed Chief, Office of Industrial 
Security, Defense Contract Adminis- 
tration Services (DCAS), Defense 
Supply Agency. He succeeds Col. 
James S. Cogswell, USAF, who has 
been designated as Special Assistant 
to the Dep. Dir. for DCAS. 

Col. Theodore Antonclli, USA, has 
been named Dir. of the Office of 
Research & Systems, Military Traffic 
Management and Terminal Service. 

Col. Leon Stann, USAF, has been 
designated Dep. Commander, Defense 
1'iiel Supply Center. He has been 
serving as Acting Commander since 
the hospitalization of RAdm. Winston 
H. Schloof, SC, USN. 

Cnpt. Robert R. Campbell, SC, USN, 
has been named Dep. Commander, 
intense Electronics Supply Center, 
Dayton, Ohio. 

Capt. Carl J. Stringer, SC, USN, is 
the new Dep, Commander, Defense 
Supply Depot, Mechanicsburg, Pa. 

Col. Paul A, Legg, USAF, has been 
assigned as Dir., Office of Planning 
& Management, Defense Electronics 
supply Center, Dayton, Ohio. 

Col. George D. Mobbs, USAF, has 
been named Dir. of Value Engineering, 
Office of Asst. Secretary of Defense 
(Installations & Logistics). 

Col Milton Frank, USAF, has been 
named Chief of Public Affairs for the 
Worth American Air Defense Com- 
mand. He takes over for Col. Harold 
Woodruff, USAF, who is retiring. 

Defense Industry Bulletin 




DEPARTMENT 
OF THE ARMY 

Maj. Gen. Robert F. Secdlock has 
been named Dir., Military Construc- 
tion, in the Office of the Army Chief 
oi Engineers. He succeeds Brig. Gen. 
John C. Dalrymple, who has been re- 
assigned to the Office of the Den 
Chief of Staff (Logistics), Dept. of 
the Army. 

Maj. Gen. Roland B. Anderson, 
Commanding General, Army Weapons 
Command, Rock Island, 111., has been 
reassigned to the Office of the Asst. 
Secretary of the Army (Installations 
At Logistics) as Dir., Army Procure- 
ment. 

Former Dir. of Army Research 
Ma]. Gen. Walter E. Lot/, Jr., has re- 
turned from duty in Vietnam to be- 
come Chief of Communications-Elec- 
tronics, Dept. of the Army. 

Brig. Gen. Horace G. Davisson, re- 
cently nominated for a second star, 
has been assigned as Dep. Command- 
ing General, Army Weapons Com- 
mand, replacing Brig. Gen. Charles M. 
Prosser who will retire from the 
Army. 

Brig. Gen. James A. Hcbbeler 
is the new Dir. of the Chemical- 
Biological-Radiological and Nuclear 
Operations in the Office of the Asst. 
Chief of Staff (Force Development), 
Department of the Army, 

Brig. Gen. John K. Boles Jr., has 
assumed new duties as Dep. Com- 
manding General, Army Test and 
Evaluation Command, Aberdeen Prov- 
ing Ground, Md. 

Dr, George W. Howard has re- 
tired as Technical Dir. of the Army 
Research & Engineer Research and 
Development Laboratories, Fort Bel- 
voir, Va., ending a 35-year military 
civilian career. 

Col. John S. Chambers Jr., became 
Commanding Officer of Picatinny 
Arsenal, Dover, N.J., upon retirement 
of Col. Henry W. Wishnrt. 

Col. Harry L. Bush has assumed 
command of the Army Aviation Mate- 
riel Laboratories, Fort Eustis, Va., 
succeeding Col. John L. Klingenhagen, 

The following staff assignments 
within the Office of the Chief of Re- 
search & Development, Department of 
the Army, are announced: 

Col. Robert K. Moore has been ap- 
pointed Chief, Air Mobility Div., De- 
velopment Directorate; Col. John E. 
Kuffner has been appointed Chief, 
Nuclear, Chemical - Biological Div., 



Missiles & Space Directorate; Col. 

SSnt* 6 . ^ am T U Jr " has been ap- 
pointed Executive, Office of the Chief 
oi Research & Development; Col. John 

Rlvi "i A ha , a ^ cen ^P^ted Chief, 
Review & Analysis Div., Plans & Pro- 
grams Directorate. 

DEPARTMENT 
OF THE NAVY 

RAdm. Charles E. Loughlin has 
been assigned as Commandant, Naval 
Dist., Washington, D.C. 

Capt. Martin D. Carmody has been 

Sgo aS T1 Pl ' ojCct Manager for the 
KEWSON Project, Naval Material 
Command. 

Capt. Burton H. Andrews has been 
reassigned as Dep. Dir., Laboratory 
Irograms, Navy Material Command. 
He previously served in the Office of 
the Dir. of Defense Research and En- 
gineering. 

Capt. Charles W. Griffing, has been 
named Commanding; Officer, U.S. 
Navy Space Systems Activity, Head- 
quarters Air Force Space Systems 
Div. (AFSC), Los Angeles, Calif. 

Capt Lawrence Lovig Jr., SC, is 
the new Asst. Dep. Chief of Naval 
Material (Logistic Support). 

Capt. Walter F. Mazzone, has taken 
over as Officer-in-Charge, Submarine 
Systems Project Technical Office, 
Navy Submarine Support Facility, 
San Diego, Calif. 

Capt. Donald C. Stanley has been 
assigned as Commanding Officer, 
Naval Weapons Evaluation Facility, 
Kirtland AFB, N.M. 

DEPARTMENT 
OF THE AIR FORCE 

Lt. Gen. Thomas P. Gerrity, Dep. 
Chief of Staff, (Systems & Logistics), 
U.S. Air Force, has been assigned ad- 
ditional duty as Senior Air Force 
Member, Military Staff Committee of 
the United Nations. 

Maj. Gen. Jack J. Cation, Dip., 
Aerospace Programs, U.S. Air Force, 
has been assigned additional duty as 
Asst. Dep. Chief of Staff, (Programs 
& Resources). 

Brig. Gen. Horace D. Aynesworth 
has been reassigned as Dep. Dir. 
of Operations, (AFLC), Wright- 
Patterson AFB, Ohio, from duty as 
Asst. to the Dep. Chief of Staff 
(Plans & Operations), U.S. Air Force. 

Col. Ralph A. Johnson has reported 
to Robins AFB, Ga., as Warner- 
Robins Air Materiel Area Director of 
Procurement and Production. 

Col. Henry J. Mazur is the new 
Chief of the U.S. Strike Command 
System Program Office (492L) for the 
Electronic Systems Div. (AFSC), L. 
G. Hanscom Field, Mass. 

Col. David V. Miller became Vice 
Commander, Space Systems Div. 
(AFSC), Los Angeles, Calif., Sept. 1. 



by 
Maj. Gen. Marvin C. Dernier, USAF 



The life expectancy of our nation 
in the decades ahead will depend on 
the success of translating ideas into 
new and improved aerospace weapon 
systems. The rapid application of 
ideas to the next generation of systems 
is a life-blood necessity for preserving 
the security of the free world in the 
international race for survival. Effec- 
tive use of creative ideas hold the Itey 
to the future. 

Translation of ideas into new 
weapon systems is the mutual con- 
cern of both the Air Force and in- 
dustry. The Air Force Systems Com- 
mand (AFSG) is responsible for 
advancing aerospace technology by ac- 
quiring the beat possible aerospace 
systems for the nation. However, 
tomorrow's weapon systems cannot 
become a reality without industry's 
assistance. Industrial ideas are melded 
into Air Force needs by the Research 
and Technology Division (RTD) of 
the Air Force Systems Command. 

In July 1962, RTD was es- 
tablished as a major step toward 
the improved management o t Air 
Force research and development re- 
sources. Formation of the division 
resulted in strengthening the Air 
Force in-house laboratories by eve- 
nting a broad base of military tech- 
nology for timely application in sys- 
tems development. 

Initial action in the establishment 
of RTD was the consolidation of 30 
smalt, scattered Systems Command 
laboratories into eight major Air 
Force laboratories and the Systems 
Engineering Group (SEG), The field 
organizations wore regrouped by tech- 
nical area under RTD to strengthen 
the Air Force in-house research and 
development capability and provide a 
focal point for information on all tech- 
nological progress in industry, univer- 
sities and research organizations 
(Figure 1), 

The division assures effective cou- 
pling with the industrial and scientific 
community through the operation of 
Area and Host Scientific and Tech- 
nical Liaison Offices (STLO's) atrate- 
tegically located in the United States, 



Canada and the Canal Zone. Area 
STLO's establish and maintain liaison 
with research and development organ- 
ixations in a wide geographical zone 
but the coupling efforts of host offices 
are limited to activities at the as- 
signed installations (See STLO list- 
ing on page 27). 

The responsibility for providing 
laboratory support to existing and fu- 
ture systems through the AFSG sys- 
tems divisions also assures that RTD 
is knowledgeable of all systems needs. 
RTD's close contact with the AFSC 
systems divisions facilitates rapid 
translation of ideas into weapon sys- 
tems. 

RTD functions like a computer by 
accepting diverse technical ideas and 
providing rapid read out of technology 
into a framework of meaningful ex- 
ploratory and advanced development 
programs. The division manages, 
through its eight laboratories and 
SEG, 1,250 technical efforts with more 
than 8,000 research and development 
contracts at a total value in excess 
of $1.5 billion. 

A major RTD objective is providing 
effective team leadership in using the 




Maj . Gen. Marvin C. Demlcr, 
USAF, Commander, Research & Tech- 
nology Div., Air Force Systems Com- 
mand, has held key positions in the 
Air Force, research and development 
program since being commissioned in 
1938. Prior to his present assignment 
he was Director of Advanced Tech- 
nology, Hq., USAF. 



nation's total scientific and technical 
resources in development of weapon 
systems. The division's range of in- 
terests in scientific and technical in- 
novations has unlimited horizons, 
extending wherever there arc ideas. 
The wide open RTD antenna is re- 
ceptive to ideas from any person or 
organization associated with tech- 
nology, particularly industry. What, 
then, is required to promote maximum 
cooperation for channelling valuable 
innovations from the bench scientist 
to the Air Force for quick application 
to existing and new weapon systems? 
Maximum cooperation can begin 
with the widespread dissemination of 
Air Foi'ce requirements. In response, 
industry can evaluate its work in the 
research and development spectrum to 
select ideas for submission to the Aii 
Force. RTD functions as 'a reception 
desk for ideas. Numerous methods 
readily available for coupling Ii 
trial ideas to Air Force needs. 

Knowledge of Air Force technical 
needs is essential for effective market- 
ing of any innovation. Each year a 
scries of Technical Objective Docu- 
ments (TOD's) is prepared by Air 
Force laboratories identifying Aft 
Force technical problem areas requit- 
ing the assistance of science and in' 
dustry. Broad technical guidance nol 
normally available elsewhere is con 
tained in these documents to assist ii 
research and development planning 
and submission of unsolicited pro 
posals. The guidance includes signifi 
cant information on specific progran 
objectives, existing state of the ail 
technical forecast, and the responsi 
ble laboratory project officer for clircc 
personal contact. 

Any qualified organization in th 
scientific and industrial commvmit 
with a research and dcvclopmei 
capability may request the document. 
Requests for participation in the TCX 
Release Program should be ttibmtttc 
to Headquarters, Research and Ted 
nology Division. 

Technical guidance on Aiv For- 
needs is also presented at numerm 
conferences during the year. For 



September 



ample, early in 1966 the Commander, 
RTD, emphasized to defense contrac- 
tors and potential contractors com- 
plete Air Force needs. He was part of 
a team which presented factual infor- 
mation on defense planning, policies 
and probable developments at the Ad- 
vanced Planning; Briefings for Indus- 
try at Boston, Atlanta, St. Louis, San 
Francisco and Washing-ton, D.C. 
Large groups of management officials, 
research scientists and marketing ex- 
perts from the entire spectrum of 
largo and small business concerns at- 
tended the briefings sponsored by the 
Defense Department and the National 



Security Industrial Association. 

RTD is a fisher for scientific and 
technical ideas through advance pub- 
lication of future technical require- 
ments in the U. S. Department of 
Commerce "Business Daily." A review 
of these synopsized requirements per- 
mits a rapid response to the RTD 
line of interests. 

The RTD open house program of 
lectures and demonstrations provides 
an opportunity for attendees to be- 
come better acquainted with the divi- 
sion's key personnel, technical pro- 
grams, capabilities, special equipment, 
facilities and support of systems di- 



Research and Technology Division 

Air Force Systems Command 
Boiling APB, Washington, D.C. 20332 



Rome Air Development Center 
GrifllHH AFB, N T ,Y. 13442 



AF Aero-Propulsion Laboratory 
Wright-Patterson AFB, 
Ohio 45433 



AF Avionics Laboratory 
Wright-Patterson APB, 
Ohio 45433 



AF Flight Dynamics Laboratory 
Wright-Patterson AFB, 
Ohio 45433 

AP Materials Laboratory 
Wright-Patterson AFB, 
Ohio 45433 



AF Weapons Laboratory 
Kirtluml APB, N.M. 87117 



AF Rocket Propulsion 

Laboratory 
Edwards AFB, Calif. 03523 



AF Armament Laboratory 
Elgin AFB, Fla. 32542 

Systems Engineering Group 
Wright-Patterson AFB, 
Ohio 45433 



Surveillance TechnologyIntelligence Col- 
lection and Processing Reconnaissance 
IJata Handling Communications Com- 
puter Technology Data Presentation 
High Power Electromagnetic Technology. 
Turbine Engines Ramjet Engine Propul- 
sionElectric and Non-Chemical Ad- 
vanced Propulsion ConceptsPower Gen- 
eration Fuels and Lubricants Aerospace 
Support Techniques. 

Navigation and Guidance Reconnaissance 
1 cchmques Aerial Surveillance Laser 
techniques Electron Devices and Proc- 
esses Electromagnetic Warfare Electro- 
magnetic Environment Aerospace Data 
1 ransmission. 

Structures Flight Mechanics Flight 
Control Vehicle Dynamics Environmen- 
tal Control Aerospace Vehicle Mechanical 
Systems Recovery and Crew Station. 
Structural Materials Environmental Re- 
sistanceMaterials for Seals, Sealants 
and Compliant Applications Materials 
tor Electromagnetic Applications Mate- 
rials for Energy Conversion, Transfer and 
h to rage. 

Nuclear Weapons Components Biophysi- 
cal Studies Nuclear Power Applications 
Environment Research Nuclear Weap- 
ons Effects Research, Testing and Simu- 
lation. 

Pronellant and Combustion Technology 
Liquid Rocket Technology Solid Rocket 
technology Nuclear Rocket Technology 
Aerospace Ground Equipment Technol- 
ogyRocket Propulsion Facility Technol- 
ogy. 

Conventional Munitions Chemical-Biolog- 
ical Technical Development Target and 
Scoring Techniques. 

Systems Engineering and Technical Direc- 
tion for Aeronautical Systems Study and 
Analysis Support for AFSC and Other 
Government Agencies Procurement Serv- 
ices for USAF Laboratories at Wright- 
Patterson AFB. 



Figure 1, 



visions. The open house, originally 
designed for Government scientists, 
engineers and research and devel- 
opment administrators, has been 
expanded to include aerospace indus- 
tries and university officials. The eye- 
hall-to-eyeball contact at the lectures 
and demonstrations encourages indus- 
trial representatives to return home 
and evaluate their own laboratory 
efforts for possible application to Ail- 
Force needs. 

Speeches by the Commander, RTD, 
and Dr. Leon Green, Jr., RTD Scien- 
tific Director, often emphasize tech- 
nical areas of interest. Key speeches 
and presentations are frequently de- 
signed to trigger a response from in- 
dustry with new and better ideas for 
the next generation of weapon sys- 
tems. 

RTD operates like a miner, descend- 
ing into many laboratory veins in the 
nation focusing the Air Force head- 
lamp to uncover ideas for use in 
weapon systems. Accordingly, the Air 
Force sponsors and co-sponsors many 
technical symposia each year in ex- 
ploratory and advanced development 
program areas which attract a wide 
variety of scientific and engineering- 
personnel across the country. The di- 
vision has emphasized professional im- 
provement programs for its key labo- 
ratory and management personnel 
which have included attendance at 
technical symposia. Attendance at the 
specialized symposia, such as the An- 
nual Symposium on Space and Ballis- 
tics Missile Technology and the Mate- 
rials Symposium provides unlimited 
opportunities for the exchange of new 
ideas with representatives of profes- 
sional societies, industry and univer- 
sities. Invitations- to the technical 
symposia can he obtained from the 
professional societies sponsoring the 
event. 

Publication of the Research and 
Technology Briefs magazine is a ma- 
jor division effort of identifying for 
industry in-house research and devel- 
opment efforts in progress. The 
Briefs, published each month as an 
unclassified document, contains scien- 
tific and technical articles, papers by 
leading Air Force laboratory person- 
nel and a calendar of key scientific 
and engineering- symposia and meet- 
ings. Research organizations may be 
placed on distribution for the Briefs 
by submitting a written request to 
RTD headquarters. 

(Continued on Page 27} 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



S M 7 



T F S' 



11 



667 



1 
8 

i 5 M! 

. >2 

25 26 27 28 20 30 



12 13,1* 
IS 19 20 2i 



M M' T W T F S 

' j, 

2 3 4 ' g 7 '8 

10 U 12 13 14 16 

16< 47 18 19 20 21 22 

23 24 25 2S 27 28, 28 

3P Si .,..,..' ' . 



^OCTOBER/;! 966': 



6 7 S ? 10 U 12 

13 14 IS 16 17, 18 19 

2J 22 23 24 25 26 

27, ?8 29 3fi 



?NOVEMBERtl966o^| 



SPEAKERS CALENDAR 



;S""-"?:f31 



DEPARTMENT 
OF DEFENSE 

Maj. Gen. W. T. Smith, USAF, 
Chief of Staff, Defense Communica- 
tions Agency, at Armed Forces Com- 
munications and Electronics Assn., St. 
Louis, Mo., Oct. 7. 

Mr. B. B. Lynn, Dcp. Dir., Defense 
Contract Audit Agency, at the Na- 
tional Contract Management Assn., 
Boston, Mass., Oct. 7; at the Long 
Island Chapter, National Assn. of Ac- 
countants, Long Island, N.Y., Oct. 18; 
at the National Assn. of Accountants, 
Chicago, 111., Nov. 4; at the Electronic 
Industries Assn., Government Pro- 
curement Relations Dept., Colorado 
Springs, Colo., Nov. 17. 

Lt. Gen. H. C. Donnelly, USAF, 
Dir., Defense Atomic Support Agency, 
at World Affairs Council Meeting, 
Pittsburgh, Pa., Nov. 17. 



DEPARTMENT 
OF THE ARMY 

Gen, Frank S. Reason Jr., Com- 
manding General, U.S. Army Materiel 
Command, at Advance Planning Brief- 
ing lor Industry (appearance only), 
Rock Island, 111,, Sept. 27. 

Maj. Gen. Keith L. Ware, Chief of 
Information, at Association of the 
U.S.. Army Annual Meeting, Sheraton 
Park Hotel, Washington, D.C., Oct. 
1.0-12 (appearance only); at Eighth 
Annual Honors Luncheon of the Army 
Aviation Assn. of America, Shoreham 
Hotel, Washington, D.C., Oct. 14 (ap- 
pearance only). 

Brig. Gen. Lloyd B. Ramsey, Dep. 
Chief of Information, at Annual Assn; 
of the U.S. Army Meeting, Sheraton- 
Park Hotel, Washington, D.C., Oct. 
10-12 (appearance only) ; at Recep- 
tion by Army Aviation Assn, of 
America, Shoi-eham Hotel, Washing- 
ton, D.C., Oct. 14 (appearance only), 

Col. Thomas O. Blakeney, Director, 
Materiel, Army Combat Developments 
Command, Fort Belvoir, Va., at Ad- 
vanced Planning Briefing for Indus- 
try, Rock Island, 111., Sept, 27 (panel 
member). 



DEPARTMENT 
OF THE NAVY 

Hon. Paul H. Nitze, Secretary of 
the Navy, at Institute of Electrical 
and Electronic Engineers Annual Con- 



vention r Washington, D.C., Oct. 3; at 
Navy League Dinner, New York City, 
Oct. 26; at Navy Day Celebration, 
Charleston, S.C., Oct. 27. 

Hon. Robert IT. B. Baldwin, Under 
Secretary of the Navy, at National 
Maritime Union Convention, New 
York City, Oct. 4; at Propeller Club, 
Washington, D.C., Oct. 5; at Navy 
Day Luncheon, New Orleans, La., and 
Navy Day Dinner, Naval Air Station, 
Pensacola, Fla., Oct. 27; at Civil Serv- 
ice Board of Advisors Dinner, Pensa- 
cola, Fla., Oct. 28. 

Admiral David L. McDonald, Chief 
of Naval Operations, at Propeller 
Club, Washington, D.C., Oct. B; at 
Foreign Services Institute, Washing- 
ton, D.C., Oct. 12; at Industrial Col- 
lege of the Armed Forces Meeting, 
Norfolk, Va., Nov. 3. 

VAdm. I. J. Galantin, Chief of 
Naval Material, at Defense Weapon 
Systems Management Center, Wright- 
Patterson AFB, Ohio, Oct., 7; at 
American Management Assn., Wash- 
ington, D. C., Oct. 17. 

RAdm. H. A. Renkcn, Commander 
Service Force, Atlantic, at Sixth Reg- 
ular Convention of the Navy League, 
Pompono Beach, Fla., Oct. 7. 

Mr. Paul R. Miller, Asst. for Qual- 
ity Control, Special Projects Office, at 
Region Two Conference of American 
Institute of Engineers, Atlantic City, 
N.J., Oct. 13. 

Adm. Thomas H. Moorcr, Com- 
mander-in-Chief, Atlantic Fleet, at 
Navy League & Kiwanis Club, Rich- 
mond, Va., Oct. 24; at Navy Day 
Luncheon, Philadelphia, Pa., Oct. 27. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Gen. J, P. McConncll, Chief of Staff, 
USAF, at Defense Orientation Con- 
ference, Washington, D.C., Sept. 30; 
at American Ordnance Assn. Meeting, 
Los Angeles, Calif., Oct. 5-6; at In- 
ternational Congress of Air Tech- 
nology, Hot Springs, Ark., Oct. 28. 

Hon. Robert H. Charles, Asst. Sec- 
retary of the Air Force (Installations 
and Logistics), at Institute of Gov- 
ernment Contracts, Dallas, Tex,, Sept. 
30. 

Hon. Norman S. Paul, Under Sec- 
retary of the Air Force, at National 
Space Club, Washington, D.C., Oct. 18. 

Maj. Gen. H. B. Manson, Com- 
mander, Air Force Flight Teat Center, 
Edwards AFB, Calif., at Trade Club 
Meeting, Bakersfield, Calif., Oct. 19. 



Brig. Gen. L. A. Kiley, Commander 
Air Force Missile Development Cen- 
ter, Holloman AFB, N.M., at Incrtial 
Guidance Symposium, Holloman AFB, 
Oct. 19-21. 

Lt. Gen. T. P. Gerrity, Dep. Chief 
of Staff, Systems and Logistics, at 
Air University, Maxwell AFB, Ala., 
Oct. 26. 



Navy-Industry Conference 
on Systems Effectiveness Set 

"The Impact of Systems Effective- 
ness Contracting," will be the theme 
of the Ninth Navy-Industry Confer- 
ence on Systems Effectiveness to lw 
held Oct. 26-26, in Washington, D.C. 

The program for the conference, 
developed by the Naval Air Systems 
Effectiveness Advisory Board, will in- 
clude such topics as, "The Impact of 
Reliability Demonstrations," "The 
Shape of Data Today and Tomor- 
row," "The Impact of Logistics nnd 
Support," and "Effective Roliabilit> 
Management for Total Cost," 

Speakers at this year's conference 
will include the Honorable Robci 
Frosch, Assistant Secretary of tti' 
Navy (Research and Development) 
Mr. George E. Fouch, Deputy Assist 
ant Secretary of Defense (Install a 
tions and Logistics); Vice Admfra 
I, J. Galantin, Chief of Naval Mate 
rial; and Rear Admiral J, P. Sage] 
Assistant Commander, Material Acqui- 
sition, Naval Air Systems Command. 



NOTICE 

Postal regulations require the 
use of Zip Codes in mailing (lie De- 
fcnse Industry Bulletin to United 
States subscribers. Please include 
your Zip Code In all subscription 
requests. 



8 



September 



The following article by Captain 
Joseph L. Howard, SC, USN, Assistant 
Chief of Naval Material (Procure- 
ment), is reprinted from the Naval 
Material Command Procurement 
Newsletter. While it was written for 
procurement personnel of the Navy, it 
is believed to be of interest to industry 
as well. The article reflects Defense 
Department policies and procedures 
regarding the determination of respon- 
sible contractors and is reprinted here 
for the information of prospective 
contractors. 

", . , nothing- is more basic to satis- 
factory procurement than that we deal 
only with responsible prospective con- 
tractors," 

Thus did Secretary of Defense Me-' 
Namara point up the critical import- 
ance of source selection. Indeed, the 
selection of dependable sources of sup- 
ply is the acid test of purchasing. No 
matter how well planned and designed 
a contract may be, if it is not awarded 
to a responsible supplier, it will not 
produce the materials or services re- 
quired on time, and it will eventually 
increase costs to the Government. De- 
fault, late deliveries and other fail- 
ures in contract performance invari- 
ably result in additional procurement 
and administrative costs. It is, there- 
fore, imperative that contracts only 
be awarded to responsible prospective 
contractors. 

False Economy. The award of a 
contract to a supplier based on price 
alone can be false economy if there 
is subsequent unsatisfactory perform- 
ance under the contract. Contract- 
awards to marginal suppliers based 
solely on the submission of the lowest 
bid or offer do not serve the objective 
of making Government purchases at 
the lowest price. Such awards act to 
increase the ultimate cost to Uncle 
Sam, 

Minimum Standards. The minimum 

standards set forth in the Armed 
Services Procurement Regulation 
(ASPR) require that a responsible 
prospective contractor must: 

Have adequate financial re- 
sources, or the ability to obtain such 
resources as required during per- 
formance of the contract. 

Be able to comply with the re- 
required or proposed delivery or 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



performance schedule, taking into 
consideration all existing business 
commitments, commercial as wall as 
governmental. 

Have a satisfactory record of 
performance. 

Have a satisfactory record of 
integrity. 

Be otherwise qualified and eli- 
gible to receive an award under ap- 
plicable laws and regulations. 

Further, in procurements involv- 
ing production, maintenance, construc- 
tion, or research and development 
work, a prospective contractor must: 

Have the necessary organization, 
experience, operational controls and 
technical skills, or the ability to obtain 
them. 

Have the necessary production, 
construction and technical equipment 
and facilities, or the ability to obtain 
them. 

While special standards of respon- 
sibility may be specified for certain 
procurements, a responsible prospec- 
tive contractor is generally one who 
meets the standards set forth above. 

An Affirmative Determination. The 
ASPR requires an affirmative deter- 
mination in writing by the contracting 
officer that the prospective contractor 
is responsible before any contract 
award may be made. In expanding on 
this important point, the Secretary of 
Defense stated that ". . . there must be 
a positive judgment that he will per- 
form the contract on schedule in ac- 
cordance with its terms. This excludes 
the company whose qualifications are 
no better than borderline as to pro- 
duction capacity, financial capability, 
past performance, or any of the other 
minimum standards. It excludes the 
company whose continuing capability 
throughout the period of performance 
is jeopardized by a pending bank- 
ruptcy, reorganization, or other evi- 
dence of financial difficulty which may 
culminate in loss of needed financial 
capabilities during the period of con- 
tract performance. It means that, in 
predicting whether a company will 
perform the contract satisfactorily, it 
must be assumed that the Government 
will use vigilant and forceful contract 
administration. It is not acceptable to 
make a determination of responsi- 
bility which envisions completed con- 



tract performance only after extreme 
Government financial assistance and 
marked lenience in enforcing delivery 
schedules or other contract terms." 

Some Exceptions. The ASPR pro- 
vides that written determinations of 
responsibility need not he made in the 
case of: 

Purchases estimated to be $10- 
000 or less. 

Orders under existing Govern- 
ment contracts (except orders of 
more than $10,000 under basic order- 
ing agreements). 

^ Contracts for perishable sub- 
sistence available for immediate ship- 
ment. 

By now you are probably wondering 
when the contracting officer makes 
these determinations of responsibility 
and where he looks for information. 
When Information Is Obtained. The 
ASPR provides that information 
necessary to make determinations of 
responsibility shall be obtained only 
concerning prospective contractors 
within range for an award and shall 
be obtained promptly after bid open- 
ing or receipt of proposals. However, 
in negotiated procurements, especially 
those involving research and develop- 
ment, such information may be ob- 
tained before the issuance of requests 
for proposals. At the same time, infor- 
mation concerning financial resources 
and performance capability should be 
acquired on as current a basis as is 
feasible with relation to the date of 
contract award. But, where does the 
contracting officer look for this. infor- 
mation ? 

Where to Look. Information con- 
cerning contractor responsibility is 
available from a wide range of 
sources, including the following: 

The Joint Consolidated List of 
Debarred, Ineligible, and Suspended 
Contractors (see ASPR 1-601). 

Navy Contractor Experience List. 
This list is used by contracting offi- 
cers as an aid in determining the 
current responsibility of suppliers and 
potential suppliers. 

The prospective contractor. Here 
it is significant to note that, accord- 
ing to the ASPR, "A prospective con- 
tractor must demonstrate affirmatively 
his responsibility . . ." The "burden 
of proof" for establishing the respon- 
sibility of a prospective contractor lies 
with the prospective contractor, not 
the contracting officer. Useful infor- 
mation is contained in bids and pro- 
posals, replies to questionnaires, 



financial data, current and past pro- 
duction records, personnel records, 
etc. 

DOD records and personnel. Rec- 
ords on file and the knowledge of per- 
sonnel within the purchasing office 
making the procurement, other pur- 
chasing offices, contract administra- 
tion offices, etc. 

o Publications, including credit 
rating's, trade and financial journals, 
business directories and registers. 

H owevcr, it m ay be th at these 
sources fall short of providing the 
contracting officer with enough infor- 
mation for a sound determination of 
responsibility. 

Pro-Award Surveys. If the informa- 
tion available to the purchasing office 
is not sufficient to enable the contract- 
ing officer to make a determination 
of responsibility, a pre-award survey 
will call to the attention of the con- 
tract administration office any factors 
which should receive special emphasis. 
The ASPR also requires that, in pro- 
curements which are significant either 
in dollar value or in the critical na- 
ture of the requirement, consideration 
shall be given to requesting the con- 
tract administration office to verify 
information regarding current work- 
load and financial capacity even 
though information available to the 
purchasing office concerning respon- 
sibility appears to be sufficient. 

A Note on Small Business Concerns. 
If a contracting officer receives a re- 
sponsive bid from a small business 
concern for a proposed award exceed- 
ing $10,000 and he has doubts as to 
tlio company's capacity or credit, he 
must have a pre-award survey made 
before determining that the company 
is not responsible for those reasons. 
If after receiving: the results of the 
pre-award survey the procuring con- 
tracting officer determines that the 
small business concern is not respon- 
sible solely by reason of a lack of 
capacity or credit, he must refer the 
matter to the Small Business Admin- 
istration (SEA), 

If a certificate of competency is 
issued by SBA, it shall be accepted by 
the contracting officer as conclusive of 
a prospective contractor's capacity 
and credit. If the contracting officer 
still has substantial doubt as to the 
concern's ability to perform, the case 
must be forwarded through channels 
on an expedited basis to the Director 
of Procurement, Office of the Assist- 



ant Secretary of the Navy (Installa- 
tions & Logistics), for review. Pro- 
curement action must be withheld 
pending receipt of instructions from 
that office. 

Here are a few additional points on 
referrals to SBA: 

The contracting officer may, at 
his discretion, refer cases to the SBA 
where a bid or proposal of a small 
business concern for a proposed award 
exceeding $2,500 but not exceeding 
$10,000 is to be rejected solely because 
he has determined the concern to be 
nonresponsiblc as to capacity or 
credit. 

A referral need not be made to 
the SBA if the contracting officer 
certifies in writing that the award 
must be made without delay. 

A referral need not bo made to 
the SBA it the contracting officer 
determines a small business concern 
nonresponsible for a reason other than 
lack of capacity or credit. 

Determinations Will Be Supported. 
Contracting officers can expect to get 
high-level support of their responsi- 
bility determination decisions. Here 
are a few examples of the type of sup- 
port they can expect; 

From the Comptroller General of 
the United States: 

"The projection of a bidder's 
ability to perform if awarded a 
contract is of necessity a matter 
of judgment. While such judg- 
ment should he based on fact and 
should be arrived at in good faith, 
it must properly be left largely to 
the sound administrative discre- 
tion of the contracting officers in- 
volved, since they are in the best 
position to assess responsibility, 
they must bear the major brunt of 
any difficulties experienced by rea- 
son of the contractor's lack of 
ability, and they must maintain 
the day-to-day relations with the 
contractor on behalf of the Gov- 
ernment." 

From Graeme S, Bannerman, As- 
sistant Secretary of the Navy (Instal- 
lations ami Logistics) : 

"It is our policy that contracts 
are to be awarded at the lowest 
sound price. This means that we 
intend to make awards only to the 
contractors who have established 
their technical and financial quali- 
fications to make timely delivery 
of reliable equipment . . . We do 
not intend to do business with un- 



qualified or marginal producers. 
There is no benefit to the Govern* 1 
ment in making an award to the 
lowest bidder unless he can deliver 
reliable equipment." 

From Vice Admiral I. J. Galantin. 
USN, Commander, Naval Material 
Command: 

"We in the Naval Material Sup- 
port Establishment must provide 
reliable, timely support to the 
fleet. Since much of our suiniort 
is provided through contract, we 
must have reliable contractors. 
Contracting officers can be assured 
of my support in this endeavor." 
Decision making in any situation is 
the toughest management demand. 
To make a decision in the environ- 
ment of contracting is doubly tough 
and doubly important. A good deci- 
sion is not an arbitrary decision, but 
one based on facts, and this is nlso 
the key in making good responsibility 
determinations. Get the facts. Make 
an honest decision. And you will be 
supported. 

The importance of candid and cor- 
rect responsibility determinations by 
contracting officers cannot be over- 
emphasizedfor the objective of a 
procurement action is not to produce 
a contract, but to produce the material 
required by our operating forces in 
a timely manner and at a reasonable 
cost to the United States taxpayers, 
This objective can be accomplished 
only if contracting officers nssure 
that contracts are always placed in the- 
hands of responsible contractors. 



Gurnee to Head 

Contractor Cost 

Reduction Program 

The responsibility for systems de- 
velopment and program review, form- 
erly split between two staff oflices, 
has been centered in the Office of the 
Deputy Assistant Secretary of De- 
fense (Logistics Services), Ofllco of 
Assistant Secretary of Defense (In- 
stallations and Logistics) , 

The Directorate for Cost Reduction 
Policy, which coordinates and admin- 
isters the Defense Contractor Goat Re- 
duction Program, will perform the 
functions for systems development 
and program review. 

Commander Herbert L, Gurnee, SC, 
USNK, former head of the Navy's 
Cost Reduction Office, will head the 
Defense Contractor Cost Reduction 
Program, 



10 



September 




MEETINGS AND SYMPOSIA 



SEPTEMBER 

Symposium on Galio-Arsenide, Sept. 
26-27, in Reading-, England. Sponsor: 
AF Avionics Laboratory, Research 
and Technology Div., Air Force Sys- 
tems Command, Contact: R. W. Run- 
nelle (AVN), Air Force Avionics Lab- 
oratory, Research and Technology 
Div., (AFSC), Wright-Patterson AFB, 
Ohio 45433. (Area Code 513) 253-7111, 
ext._ 5-3802 or 5-5K62. 

Sixth Annual National Conference 
on Environmental Effects on Aircraft 
and Propulsion Systems, Sept. 26-28 
at Princeton, N.,7, Sponsor: Naval Air 
Turbine Teat Station. Contact; Den- 
nis Wyaocki, Conference Vice Chair- 
man, Naval Air Turbine Test Station, 
P.O. Box 1710, 1440 Parkway Ave., 
Trenton, N,J. 08007. (Area Code 600) 
882-4414, ext. 355. 

Sixth Symposium on Naval Hydro- 
dynamics, Maneuverability, Waves 
and Physics of Fluids, Sept. 29-30 
Oct. 3-4, at Washington, D.C. Spon- 
sor: Office of Naval Research. Con- 
tact: Mrs. S. W. DoroiV, Office of 
Naval Research (Code 438), Wash- 
ington, D.C. 20360. (Area Code 202) 
OX ford 6-1433 or fi-fi881). 

OCTOBER 

Tenth Annual Organic Chemistry 
Conference, Oct. 4-5, at Natick, Mass. 
Co-sponsors: Army Natick Labora- 
tories and the NAS-NRC Advisory 
Board on Military Personnel and Sup- 
plies. Contact: Louis Long Jr., Head, 
Organic Chemistry Laboratory, Army 
Nntick Laboratories, Natick. Mass. 
(Area Code 617) 653-1000, ext. 414. 

TI o I*: onth Annual Symposium on 
U,S. An- Force Antenna Research and 
Development, Oct. 11-13, at the Uni- 
versity of Illinois, Allerton Park, 111. 
Sponsor: Air Force Avionics Labora- 
tory, Contact: Mr. Turner (AVWE-3), 
Air Force Avionics Laboratory, Re- 
sen re h and Technology Div., (AFSC), 
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433. 
(Area Code 513) 253-7111, ext. 6-5720. 
_ Classified Advanced Planning Brief- 
ing for Industry on Electronic Sys- 
tems, Oct. 18-20, at Boston, Mass. 
Go-Sponsors: Air Force Electronic 
Systems Div., (AFSC) and National 
faecunty Industrial Assn. Contact: 
Paul A. Newman, NSIA Dent. N., 
Suite 800, 1030 15th St., N.W., Wash- 
ington, D.C. 20005. 

Colloquium on the Photographic In- 
teraction Between Radiation and Mat- 
ter, Oct. 26-27, at Washington. D.C. 
Go-sponsors: Air Force Office of 
Scientific Research and the Society of 
fhotographic Scientists and Engi- 
' c 9 nt octJ Dr. Amos G. Homey 
), Air Force Office of Scientific 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



Research, Washington, D.C. 20383. 
(Area Code 202) OXford 6-8705. 

NOVEMBER 

25th Anniversary Symposium on 
Personnel Research and System Ad- 
vancement, Nov. 1-3, at San Antonio, 
lex. Sponsors: Personnel Research 
Laboratory and Southwest Research 
Institute. Contact: Jack Barman, 
Southwest Research Institute, San 
Antonio, Tex. (Area Code 512) 0V 
4-2000. ' 

Ship Control System Symposia, 

Nov. 15-17, at Annapolis, Md. Spon- 
sor: U.S. Navy Marine Engineering 
Laboratory. Contact: Walter J. Blum- 
berg', Steering Committee Chairman, 
USN Marine Engineering Laboratory, 
Annapolis, Md. (Area Code 301) 268- 
7711, ext 8670. 

_ Fifth Annual Symposium on Phys- 
ics of Failure in Electronics, Nov. 10- 
18, at Columbus, Ohio. Co-Sponsors: 
Battelle Memorial Institute and the 
Rome Air Development Center. Con- 
tact : Joseph Schramp ( EMERP ) ; 
Rome Air Development Center, Grif- 
hss, AFB, N.Y. 13442. 

Third Annual Failure Analysis 
Seminar, Nov. 17-18, at the NASA 
Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, 
Tex. Sponsor: Texas Chapter of the 
American Society for Metals and 
NASA-MSC. Contact: Dr. David E. 
Hartman, Houston Research Institute, 
Inc., 6001 Gulf Freeway, Houston, 
Tex. 77023. (Area Code 713) 928-5001. 

Third Congress on Information Sys- 
tems Science and Technology, Nov 
21-22, at Buck Hills Falls, Pa. Co- 
Sponsoi-s: Electronic Systems Div., 
(AFSC) and Mitre Corp, Contact: 
Col. C. A. Laustrup (ESRC), Project 
Onieer, Electronic Systems Div., 
(AFSC), L. G. Hanscom Field, Bed- 
ford Mass. 01731. (Area Code 617) 
271-4527. 

Symposium on the Structure of 
Surfaces, date undetermined, at Dur- 
""" N.C. Sponsor: Army Research 
Office-Durham. Contact: Dr. H. M. 
Davis, Director, Metallurgy and 
Ceramics Div., Army Research Office 
-Durham Box CM, Duke Station, 



First Nuclear Criticality Safety 

National Topical Meeting, Dec. 13-15, 
at Las Vegas, Nev. Sponsors: Amer- 
ican Nuclear Society and organiza- 
tions and contractors of the Atomic 
Energy Commission, National Aero- 
nautics and Space Administration and 
the Air Force. Contact: A. J. Smith, 
SWT A a o , > Refl ctor Safety Group 
(WljAb-1), Air Force Weapons Lab- 
oratory, Kirtland AFB, N.M. 87117. 



DECEMBER 

15th Annual Wire & Cable Sympo- 
sium, Dec. 2-9, at Atlantic City, N.J. 
Sponsor: U.S. Army Electronics Com- 
mand. Contact: Milton Tenser, Elec- 
tronic Parts and Materials Div., Elec- 
tronics Components Laboratory, U.S. 
Army Electronics Command, Fort 



Warner Robins AMA 
Gets CV-2 Logistics Chores 

Logistics support management of 
the CV ; 2 Caribou aircraft, which the 
U.S. Air Force will receive from the 
Army under an interservice agree- 
ment assigning responsibility for 
transport aircraft in combat zones to 
the Air Force, has been assumed by 
the Warner Robins Air Materiel 
Area, Robins AFB, Ga. 

San Antonio Air Materiel Area, 
Kelly AFB, Tex., already inventory 
manager for the Pratt & Whitney 
R-^000 engine which powers the De- 
Havilland-manufactured CV-2, will 
provide logistics support for the en- 
gine. 

Under the agreement, the Air Force 
will receive 144 Caribou aircraft. 

Warner Robins will also manage 
logistics support of the DeHavilhmd 
CV--7 Buffalo, now in the research 
and development stage. No assign- 
ment has been made on the Buffalo's 
1-64 engine. 



Navy Tests Automatic 
HELO Escape System 

The U. S. Navy is testing a unique 
new helicopter fuselage capsule es- 
cape system which can be activated 
automatically by the pilot or one of 
the crew and does not require any 
action by passengers in an emerg- 
ency. 

The system begins operation when 
rotor blades are jettisoned to pro- 
vide a clear area for parachutes 
to open. Next, the fuselage is sever- 
ed to separate occupied and unoccu- 
pied sections. Separation rockets are 
ignited on the unoccupied portion 
thrusting it away to prevent colli- 
sion between the sections. Para- 
chutes bring the occupied fuselage 
section safely to earth. 

H-25 helicopters, specially designed 
for remote controlled flight, are be- 
ing used as test vehicles, The test 
program is being conducted by the 
Naval Aerospace Recovery Facility. 
El Centra, Calif. 



11 




Address by Dr. Chalmers W. Sker- 
win, Dep, Dir. (Research and Tech- 
nology) , Office of Dir. of Defense 
Research. & Engineering, at meeting 
jointly sponsored by the Patent Law 
Assn. of Chicago and the Chicago 
Assn. of Commerce & Indiistry, Chi- 
cago, III, April 27, 1966. 




Dr. Chalmers W. Sherwin 

Project Hindsight 

Measuring the Payoff of 

Research and Technology 

to Defense 

Early in 1964 we started to attack 
the problem of trying to assess the 
importance and value of research and 
technology to defense and to see if 
there is a favored way of managing 
it to produce high pay-off. After con- 
siderable discussion, we decided to 
focus on an examination of past ac- 
complishments rather than the pre- 
diction of future ones. The reason for 
this decision was basically pragmatic. 
We believed that it took five to 10 
years for discoveries or inventions to 
be applied to the Defense inventory 
andj thus, have their utility established 
unambiguously. We had to be certain 
that the accomplishments we focused 
on had an identifiable Utilization. 
Scientists and engineers have a pro- 
clivity to wave their arms and point 
enthusiastically toward the future 
predicting great things for their re- 
cent pet discoveries and inventions, 



and they strain at the leash to spend 
the next billion dollars of research 
and technology money. Few, however, 
have any interest in what happened 
with the last billion dollars, not to 
mention the $10 billion which we esti- 
mate DOD has spent in this category 
since 1946. We wanted to find out 
what this large sum had accomplished 
and also to see if we could find any 
general lessons regarding its efficient 
management which might prove appli- 
cable today. We are particularly 
interested in principles which can be 
effected through policy actions in 
DOD. 

Our approach is as follows: Select 
a recent weapon system (we took the 
Bullpup air-to-ground tactical guided 
missile as a pilot study), examine all 
of its subsystems and components 
and in each case ask, "What recent 
scientific knowledge or new technology 
is important to the increasing of the 
performance or reducing of the cost?" 
"Where was the work done?" "What 
motivated the creators?" "How was 
the research initially financed?" 

Our first goal was to prove to our- 
selves that one could identify discrete 
research or exploratory development 
events (which we call RXD events) 
which are, in fact, clearly important 
to improving the cost effectiveness of 
the system. 

(In DOD, the program we call ex- 
ploratory development is largely tech- 
nology.) In Bullpup, the ad hoc team 
in the Office of the Director, Defense 
Research and Engineering, identified 
43 RXD events and ran down the es- 
sential background information on 
most of them. For example, one event 
(research category) was the develop- 
ment in 1942 of the theory of correla- 
tion, statistical filtering and prediction 
by Norbert Wiener. In 1950, this the- 
ory was applied at the Massachusetts 
Institute of Technology to radar sig- 
nal detection using an electronic cor- 
relator (a second research event). In 
1962, the correlator concept was used 
at the Martin Company to design an 
anti-jam radio guidance system as an 
alternate system for the Matador mis- 
sile. (This extension of the concept to 
radio guidance is an exploratory de- 



velopment event.) When the Martin 
Company received the Request for 
Proposal for the Bullpup, they in- 
cluded the anti-jam radio link as part 
of their plan and, when Martin re- 
ceived the contract, it was incorpo- 
rated into Bullpup. 

I recite this history of three related 
RXD events not only to illustrate 
what we mean by RXD events, but 
also to illustrate several of the char- 
acteristics which our later studies con> 
firm and illuminate. In 1942, "Wiener 
was led into his basic theory because 
he had been worrying about the fire 
control problem for anti-aircraft guns. 
He was supported by a continuing 
Office of Scientific Research and De- 
velopment contract at MIT. In 10JO, 
Lee and Wiesner at the Research Lab- 
oratory for Electronics at MIT ( a 
laboratory supported mainly by DOD 
sustaining program money), along 
with two graduate students (Cheat- 
ham and Singleton), were seeking to 
improve radar detection. They ex- 
tended and interpreted the theory and 
demonstrated its application to the 
signal detection area. In 1952, Alpert 
at the Mai-tin Company, who was sup- 
ported by a combination of Matador 
guidance improvement funds and In- 
dependent corporate funds, turned the 
MIT concept into an anti-jam radio 
control system. 

What do we notice that these events 
have in common ? First, they form a 
causally related chain with a thread 
of common personal communicntton. 
Second, all three events had to happen 
for Bullpup to get its jam-free control 
link. Third, the innovators were in 
each case directly exposed! to- urgent, 
real-life problems related to defense. 
Fourth, they were able to almost im- 
mediately pursue their ideas because 
locally controlled funds were avail* 
able to carry them through the pota* 
of feasibility demonstration, Fifth, the 
initial job, and I stress initial, was 
done for a relatively small amount <tt 
money (less than $10,000 in each *t 
these cases), illustrating that modest 
amounts of locally controlled funds 
available on short notice for research 
and technology are important, prob- 
ably essential to innovation, 



12 



September 1966 



Each of these conclusions has been 
confirmed BY our current data base 
which is now over 10 times larger and 
includes information on eight addi- 
tional systems. There seems to be a 
clear pattern in the successful appli- 
cation of innovative technology, 

In addition to the three Bullpup 
events, discussed above, there were 40 
others which I cannot take the time to 
describe further. They ranged from the 
development of the thermal battery to 
new rocket engines and fuels, to new 
gyros and control systems. Again, we 
were examining new science and tech- 
nology, a class that is generally de- 
scribed as "post World War II." Look- 
ing at the time history of the 43 
events, it is significant that 23 of 
them occurred over a 12-year period, 
prior to the original 1954 development 
contract to the Martin Company, and 
20 occurred afterward. The last one 
occurred in 1964, no less than 4 years 
after the second production contract! 
This shows how, if the management 
system permits it, there is a contin- 
ual flow of innovating technology into 
a weapon system at all stages, con- 
tinually upgrading its performance or 
reducing its cost. This situation, in 
winch much further innovation is 
needed after system definition, was 
not due to poor planning. A 1953 
Bureau of Aeronautics report (the 
Pitkin report) made a careful analysis 
of the system concept and concluded 
that the technology was in hand to 
do the job, 

Let us look at some other features 
regarding the Bullpup events. An ex- 
amination of funding sources shows 
that 74 percent of the events were 
funded by DOD dollars, 24 percent by 
corporate investment (mostly by de- 
fense industry) and two percent by 
foreign defense-oriented sources. 

Eighty-seven percent of the events 
had as "targets" a Government system 
or technical problem, predominantly 
military, and no less than 38 percent 
were specifically directed toward the 
Bullpup system itself, 

Nine percent of the events were in 
the research category (which is high, 
we have discovered since). 

Universities were the originating 
source of six percent of the events, 
Government in-house laboratories 26 
percent and industry 63 percent. 

What has all this accomplished? 
We now have an operational missile 
which is several times as effective 
against defended point targets such as 
bridges, ships, etc., as compared to 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



unguided bombs. What this means to 
military operations in terms of re- 
duced sortie rates, pilot risks and sup- 
port manpower is easy to appreciate. 
It Is not the great breakthrough, 
but rather the cumulative, synergistic 
effect of some 40-odd innovations 
which make the radical improvement. 
Each of the innovations, taken by it- 
self, would produce little or no im- 
provement. This finding is of funda- 
mental importance. It implies that it 
takes a decade or more for enough of 
the inventions to "collect" to the point 
where one can show the feasibility of 
a radically improved design. It then 
takes a substantial number (typically 
20 to 30 percent) of specific additional 
innovations to make practical the 
radically improved design. (For 
Bultpup, this was 40 percent.) 

Finally, and perhaps my bias is 
showing through, we can see almost 
no source other than technology for 
significant improvement in the effec- 
tiveness/cost ratio (in the specified 
tactical role) of the Bullpup over the 
unguided bombs which it supersedes, 
I have used our early study of the 
Bullpup as an example to illustrate 
both the method of analysis and the 
inferences one can draw from this 
type of analysis. Concurrently with 
the Bullpup study, we expanded our 
program through the use of a con- 
tractor (Arthur D. Little). Using in- 
house teams, we have expanded it 
again, and it now has a name Proj- 
ect Hindsight, with Colonel Raymond 
S. Isenson as Director, We have over 
400 fully-documented BXD events in 
our files covering the following weap- 
ons systems besides Bullpup; 

Mk 46 Mod Homing Torpedo. 
106mm Howitzer. 
Hound Dog Missile. 
Polaris Missile. 
Sergeant Missile. 
Lance Missile. 
C-141 Aircraft. 
SPS-48 Radar. 

We have found that it takes 30 to 
60 man-months to analyze a typical 
system at the current level of detail 
about 100 events. 

In addition, we have active teams 
working on the following: 
Nuclear Warheads. 

Navigation Satellite. 

Minuteman II Missile. 

FADAC Artillery Computer. 

Mk 46 Mod 1 Homing Torpedo. 

Mk 66 and 57 Mines. 

152mm Warhead. 



When one examines the results of 
the current data bank, which as I 
have noted is already 10 times larger 
than the Bullpup case, it is remark- 
able how the inferences made from 
the Bullpup study are substantiated. 

Simply counting the numbers of 
events, we find that 50 to 150 are 
needed to make the quantum jump in 
systems capability. Nearly 80 percent 
of the events are funded by DOD dol- 
lars and some 90 percent had as their 
motivating target a Government need, 
predominantly military. Research 
events are down to only two or three 
percent, but several of them are very 
important. A substantial number of 
events, about 20 to 30 percent, occur 
after the system contract has been let. 
The percentage of events for in-house 
Government (34 percent), universities 
(11 percent) and industry (55 per- 
cent) is surprisingly close to the re- 
cent DOD funding pattern for applied 
research which, for 19G4-6G, was re- 
ported to the National Science Founda- 
tion as 33 percent, 13 percent and 54 
percent, respectively. (We do not have 
any simple way to determine earlier 
funding patterns, but we believe they 
change quite slowly with time). 

Once again, we find the powerful 
selective stimulus of need as the 
motivator of almost all events. Again, 
wo find that ready funding, either 
locally available or quickly available 
by one phone call to a Government 
officer (when there is an already 
established funding or contractual 
basis), occurs in a large percent of 
the cases. We are not sure whether 
good ideas attract "good" (that is, 
flexible) money, or if innovative or- 
ganizations just "happen" to always 
have such money, Either way, there is 
simply no doubt about what is needed, 
Available technology money simply 
must be spread all over the place in 
little pockets near the need, It is not 
the ivory towers which need flexible 
money the most, it is rather the or- 
ganizations heavily involved in real 
problems particularly in the early 
stages of development of new sys- 
tems. Fortunately, there is no reason 
today why this decentralized decision 
making should not be compatible with 
centralized coordination. With the new 
digital management information sys- 
tem for on-going work (the Research 
and Technology Resum6) now in op- 
eration in DOD and NASA and soon 
(hopefully) throughout the Govern- 
ment, it will be easy to decentralize 



13 



authority to initiate research and 
technology and still have at all levels 
an up-to-date knowledge of the na- 
tional program and the means to as- 
sure coordination. 

Some events are unusually impor- 
tant in their consequences. One single 
research event the transistor fol- 
lowed hy the cornucipia of new solid 
state electronic devices which flowed 
from it, so to speak, has had a sig- 
nificant impact at least a hundred 
times more frequently than any other 
event. Research in signal processing 
and information theory has also had 
an enormous impact. New engines in- 
variably under development for years 
before they are found in an important 
application set the pace for air- 
craft and missiles development more 
than any other technical area, except 
solid state electronics, To be properly 
interpreted, the Hindsight events will 
have to be weighed by some means 
at least by frequency of use. 

Finally, we aak, "What has hcen 
the pay-off of the total DOD invest- 
ment in research and technology?" 
We can estimate this by noting that 
in some cases the increase in effec- 
tiveness/cost can be determined with 
considerable accuracy (for such cal- 
culations). For example: One- of the 
systems studied was the SPS-48, a 
modern, 3-D surveillance and acquisi- 
tion radar. We have demonstrated 
that much of the critical scientific 
and technological knowledge required 
to achieve this radar was not present 
in I960 or even in 1960. The radar 
could not have been built much earlier 
than it was. Now, we must assume 
that the planned inventory purchase 
of the SPS-48's is just adequate to 
meet the current fleet surveillance 
radar requirements, With this as- 
sumption one can then determine how 
many of the best World War II tech- 
nology radars would be required to 
replace a. single SPS-48 in today's 
fleet defense environment. Our calcu- 
lation, based upon a "gedanken de- 
sign" of an improved SP radar and 
normalizing on target detection ca- 
pability, reveals that 40 of the best 
possible World War II radars distrib- 
uted geographically over the coverage 
area could barely match the perform- 
ance of. one SPS-48. This also means 
that 39 additional ships and 1,000 
sailors to man these ships also would 
be required for each SPS-48 replace- 
ment. Multiply these figures by the 
number of SPS-48's required for the 



14 



fleet and a real measure of the return 
on investment in research is apparent. 
We calculate that it would cost at 
least $15 billion more to achieve cur- 
rent capability without new science 
and technology and operate it for just 
one year .... 

Summarizing: First, we believe we 
will be able to demonstrate that, 
properly managed, the value of the 
returns from the Government invest- 
ment in research and technology out- 
weighs by orders of magnitude the in- 
vestment itself. Second, the key to 
proper management appears to be: 
Make the necessary financial and 
other resources easily and quickly 
available to the scientists and engi- 
neers who are closely coupled to the 
real technical problems of society. 



Address by Mr, Frank Thomas, 
Asnt. Dir., Nuclear Weapons, Office 
of the Director, Defense Research, 
and Engineer in ff t at the National 
Seminar of the National Classifica- 
tion Management Society, Los An- 
ffdea, Calif., July 13, 1SGG. 

Classification and 
Technical Breakthroughs 

I have selected my topic because 
I consider that the classification of 
new technology can have a strong 
effect, a feed-back on the general ad- 
vancement of technology and this re- 
lationship is not always recognized. 
As I have reviewed my talk, I dis- 
covered that perhaps most of what 
I will say today will be to tell you 
.some of the difficulties in arriving at 
a proper classification for new tech- 
nology. I hope I will be able to pro- 
vide some new perspective to make 
the job of classification a little easier 
and perhaps a little more effective. 

Within the Office of the Secretary 
of Defense there is a great deal of 
emphasis placed in "quantifying" the 
information required to make any de- 
cision. The first step in any major 
decision process is usually to quantify 
or place numerical values on all 
parameters in which this is possible 
and reserve for judgment only those 
items which cannot be so quan- 
tified. In try in g to apply that 
rationale to the subject under discus- 
sion, I discovered very little that can 
be so quantified. We can examine past 
experience and, with reservations, 
project this experience into the future. 
But there are few positive statements 
that one can make with confidence. 



Technological progress depends 
upon the creativity of individuals, 
And the creative process is a delicate 
one. Except on a statistical basis, it 
is nearly impossible to predict how or 
under what conditions new technology 
will be developed, when it will bo de- 
veloped, or even if it will be de- 
veloped at all. T will discuss some of 
these statistical results and projec- 
tions acquired by DOD later. But we 
know that thfi creative process does 
depend heavily upon an individual 
being able to acquire, examine, ques- 
tion and evaluate all new and per- 
tinent information, and classification , 
can have a major impact on the ac- 
cessibility of this information. 

Before discussing the development 
of new technology in any detail, I 
would like to make a point on the 
purpose of classification. First, Uy 
to consider and to outline the na- 
tional objectives or national goals in 
the broadest possible terms. This can 
and has been done in a number of 
different ways, by political groups 
and politicians, Presidential advisory 
committees, philosophers and others, 
Rut for purposes of illustration let 
me examine briefly the national goals 
as outlined in the Preamble to the 
Constitution. If you will permit me a 
certain editorial license these goals 
are: 

Goal I. Form a more perfect un- 
ion. 

Goal 2. Establish justice. 
Goal 3. Insure domestic tranquil- 

ity. 
Goal 4. Provide for the common 

defense. 

Goal 5. Promote the general wel- 
fare. 

Goal 6. Secure liberty. 
If one accepts that the national 
goal is (in our technical jargon) to 
optimize or maximize these six indi- 
vidual goals, then it simply cannot be 
done. Assume for a moment that \v* 
could quantify these goals and re- 
move the largely unknowable factors 
of complex human behavior. Even 
then, we could not simultaneously 
maximize all six goals. We could not 
maximize any two goals. Even with 
our simplifying assumption, mathe- 
matically we would be able to maxi- 
mize only one of the parameters or 
one of the goals for any given situa- 
tion or set of input conditions. As an 
example it is impossible to simul- 
taneously achieve, say, maximum jus- 
September 19W 



ties (Goal 2) and maximum defense 
(Goal 4). We must cither select only 
one or we must achieve a balance be- 
tween them. The President has estab- 
lished a group to examine our selec- 
tive service laws in order to achieve 
a better balance between these two 
goals. The requirements of DOD can- 
not be met while providing; absolute 
fairness or justice to all draftees, or 
potential draftees, or citizens in gen- 
eral. Inequalities are inevitable. The 
group will try to achieve the proper 
balance between defense and justice 
which will necessarily be less than 
optimum for each. 

The framers of the Constitution, 
of course, realized the necessity of ar- 
riving- at a balance between possibly 
conflicting national goals. A great 
deal of the Federalist Papers writ- 
ten by Madison, Hamilton and Jay 
was devoted to this subject. As an ex- 
ample, from the Federalist Papers, 
Madison states: "A wise nation , . . 
whilst it does not rashly preclude 
itself from any resource which may 
become essential to its safety, will 
exert all its prudence in diminishing 
both the necessity and the danger of 
resorting to one which may be in- 
auspicious to its liberties." Thus 
Madison, in this case, tries to give 
some guidelines for establishing a 
balance between defense (Goal 4) and 
liberty (Goal 8). 

A fftw years earlier, the economist, 
Adam Smith, observed that, "defense 
is of much more importance than 
opulence," thus stating in rather 
strong terms that defense is all im- 
portant. 

The point I would wish to make 
from this rather long digression la 
this; In the broadest sense any policy 
instituted by the Government, includ- 
ing the classification policy, cannot 
consider only a single national goal. 
Unless we are willing to forego all 
ffpnls except one, the policy must con- 
sider the other goals and make at 
least some attempt to resolve con- 
flict between competing goals. 

The rest of my discussion will deal 
primarily with the cause and effect 
of technological development, methods 
to enhance defense, and comments on 
achieving a balance between defense 
(Goal 4) and general welfare (Goal 5). 
Under present world conditions, 
DOD must see to it that the United 
States is in the forefront of science 
and technology, to protect the se- 
curity of the United States against 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



technological surprise, and to avoid 
obsolescence. Our defense must not 
be outflanked by a new scientific ad- 
vance which is not part of our own 
arsenal. 

In assuring that we are in the fore- 
front, it is necessary to consider the 
interdependence of current technology 
the fact that any modern tech- 
nology, particularly one associated 
with complex weapon, space or nu- 
clear systems, benefits from, and in- 
deed requires, technological input 
from diverse sources and fields. 

Early in 1964 a task group within 
the Office of the Director, Defense Re- 
search and Engineering, started to 
attack the problem of trying to assess 
the importance and the value of re- 
search and technology to defense and 
to see if there was a favored way to 
produce high pay-off, a favored way 
to achieve the proper environment. 
In order to avoid the natural bias of 
an inventor toward his most recent 
invention, the group decided to focus 
on an examination of past accomplish- 
ments rather than the prediction of 
future ones. It takes five to .10 years 
for discoveries or inventions to be ap- 
plied to the defense inventory and, 
thus, have an unbiased assessment of 
their utility. The group wanted to be 
cm-tain that the accomplishments 
that they had focused on had a clearly 
identifiable use. The objective of the 
study, called Project Hindsight, was 
to discover circumstances which DOD 
could manipulate or control, and 
which favor the initiation, execution 
and utilisation of research and de- 
velopment program, i.e., find what 
techniques or methods have been suc- 
cessful in the past, on the average, 
and which had boon unsuccessful, am! 
to make at least statistical predictions 
concerning future development. For 
each weapon system the group asked : 

What recent scientific knowledge 
or new technology is important to the 
increasing of the performance or re- 
ducing of the cost? 

Where was the work done? 

A question I will examine in more 
detail What motivated the creators? 

How was the research initially 
financed? 

In nearly all cases, technological 
advancement occurred only when these 
three elements were present: 

An explicitly understood need, 
goal, or mission. 

A source of ideas, typically a pool 
of information, and experience and 



insight in the minds of the people who 
could apply it, 

Resources, usually facilities, ma- 
terials, money, or trained men. 

The results of the study to date 
demonstrate the interdependence of 
the technologies required for modern 
weapon systems. Technological break- 
throughs, single quantum jumps, as 
one might suspect, are rare. They are 
the kind for which Nobel Prises are 
won. Such breakthroughs might in- 
clude the discovery of nuclear fission, 
the transistor and the maser. To go 
from the very basic breakthroughs, 
however, to a piece of hardware of 
significance to national defense and 
security is a long process involving 
hundreds of less spectacular and 
smaller stops in technology. The study 
showed that pnrhaps 50 to 150 of 
these smaller steps arc needed to 
make the quantum jump in system 
capability. A number of these steps 
arc made by organizations am) re- 
search personnel directly working on 
a particular project. Some of these 
are in the nature of "scheduled inven- 
tions," advances originated and moti- 
vated by the desire to find a better 
way to solve a pi-easing problem for 
the project. But a significant number 
of these steps had their origin with 
persons remote in space, and perhaps 
in time, from the groups working 011 
the specific system. 

A considerable number of those 
steps originated in research institu- 
tions or universities which provided a 
new idea, a new concept, or a ncvw 
analytical method which was readily 
adaptable to the problem at hand. 
Throughout the development process, 
free communication between technical 
communities and between the indi- 
vidual scientists and engineers is im- 
portant. A solution cannot be utilized 
unless the person who has the prob- 
lem is inado aware of the solution or 
at least the existence of the solution. 
A case in point occurred in Germany 
during World Wai: II. The German 
submarines were being badly defeated 
because they were unable to counter 
the British radar. The German Air 
Force captured some British radar 
equipment but, because of overzealous 
protection of the information, the 
German submarine command did not 
learn of this for six months. Undoubt- 
edly, the war was significantly affected 
by this one instance of .short-sighted- 
ness and over-restriction. 

Another point brought out in 



15 



Project Hindsight which may bear on 
the topic under discussion is that of 
organizational flexibility. Informal 
personal communications are an im- 
portant factor in developing new 
technology. Very often, the first ^step 
in approaching a now problem is to 
get on the telephone with a colleague 
who is or was working on a related 
problem. The colleague may be In the 
next building or across the country. 
But anything that interferes with this 
informal process impedes develop- 
ment Nearly all technological ad- 
vancement has occurred in flexible 
organizations in which strict lines ^ of 
authority do not operate and in which 
there is relatively uninhibited com- 
munication between the technical per- 
sonnel at all levels. Apparently, in 
such an organization a new idea can 
be, more easily received and evaluated 
on its merits, and the inventor is 
highly motivated to bring forth new 
and unique ideas which aid in the so- 
lution of the problem being addressed 
by his group. By and large, new tech- 
nology does not come from strict and 
authoritarian organisations. New tech- 
nology cannot be tightly restricted or 
compartmentalized. 

The point to be made is that any 
classification or other restriction on 
the free flow of technical information 
will necessarily impede the develop- 
ment process, This is true both within 
a group and between groups. The 
solution to a technical problem may 
come from a number of sources. In 
one case examined in Project Hind- 
sight, a mathematical paper written 
many years earlier suggested a new 
solution, In other cases it may ho -from 
another individual or group working 
on a related problem or from a group 
working in a technology quite remote. 
We cannot predict solutions to tech- 
nical problems. We cannot predict the 
origin of the solutions. And often we 
cannot even ask the proper questions 
or formulate the problem. But wo 
can predict that the highest proba- 
bility of achieving a technological 
advance will conic under conditions 
in which people are highly, motivated 
and have free access to all available 
information and have free and unin- 
hibited communication within their 
group and with other groups, 

I am not suggesting that the classi- 
fication barriers which we have found 
necessary in this country should be 
lowered. Perhaps the barriers should 



16 



be raised. But it should be clearly 
recognized by all concerned that bar- 
riers of any kind will necessarily 
impede and slow down the develop- 
ment process. Solutions will be missed, 
inventions re-invented, and less satis- 
factory means accepted. This is true 
in. the development of hardware for 
defense. And it is true in the devel- 
opment of hardware which benefits 
the economy as a whole. So with re- 
gard to classification, I suggest that 
two judgments are required. First, 
how much will the classification or 
restriction of a particular piece of 
new technology restrict the develop- 
ment of other defense systems? The 
balance is one of impeding your own 
development as well as that of your 
potential or actual enemies or com- 
petitors. Second, how much will the 
classification or restriction of a par- 
ticular piece of new technology re- 
strict the development of the general 
economy? The balance here bears di- 
rectly on my earlier remarks about 
national goals. There will necessarily 
be a conflict between what's best for 
defense and what's best for the gen- 
eral welfare or the general economy. 
Classification of particular technology 
may be best for our defense posture 
(relative to other nations) but may 
be bad for the general economy. 



I believe that within this country 
we have an automatic safety valve. 
This lies in the high mobility of the 
technical community. Even when spe- 
cific design information is highly re- 
stricted, the techniques and methods 
used to develop that design become 
diffused throughout the technical com- 
munity in a relatively short time by 
a reasonably efficient method. The 
technical people move, change jobs 
and adapt the new method to solve 
their new problem. If a new large 
group is established in this country to 
solve some problem or design some 
sophisticated device, you will gener- 
ally find that the group will contain 
individuals who have had experience 
at most of the major laboratories and 
industrial installations in the country, 
To some degree, the collective past ex- 
perience of all these installations can 
be focused on the new problem. When 
a technical man quits his job and 
moves on, we consider it a loss. But 
to some extent he is a missionary 
carrying with him the techniques and 
knowledge he has acquired. This dif- 
fusion process is noticeably lacking 
In totalitarian societies, and I believe 



their technology is weaker because 
of it. 

We have one other automatic feed- 
back mechanism. A great deal of the 
research and technology in this coun- 
try is done by commercial organiza- 
tions whose primary goal is to achieve 
a profit for the investors. In general, 
if a particular new technology will 
perform a useful function that could 
not be performed before (or will do It 
more cheaply or more effectively than 
it could be done before) then it will 
aid the nation as a whole. In either 
case, there is generally an economic 
incentive to utilize the technology 
in the general economy, a profit 
to be made in this utilization. Man- 
agement of a commercial organization 
will usually realize this potential and 
will take some action to see that the 
new technology, or at least portions 
of the new technology, are made avail- 
able for this purpose. I expect thai 
this mechanism is a far more efficienl 
one than negotiating values betweer 
Government bureaus as required ir 
many nations. 

I have discussed the rate of tech 
nical development as being a signifi 
cant factor in today's national fe 
fense. Today a nation cannot ileueui 
primarily on a depth of defense ii 
space but is clearly compelled lo de 
velop its depth of defense in time a 
well. Technology is indeed moving a 
a rapid rate and this is a relatival 
new factor in defense. If you vi 
permit me to go back 600 years* 
can give you an example that th 
was not always so. The English \ 
the course of their Welsh and Scotlii 
wars developed a new instrument ' 
warfare, the long bow. It clearly ou 
ranged and outmatched the ctoaabc 
which was in general use on the co 
tincnt at that time. In the course 
these wars the English had also c 
veloped the tactics which made go 
use of their new technology. In 13 
King Edward with an English an 
of 20,000 met a French army 
40,000 at Grecy in Prance. The Frcr 
army was vastly superior in mouni 
men and armor, and in continen 
warfare this was about all t] 
counted. With the longbow, hovw 
the English were able to engage 
enemy at a great distance, and 
French, under this rain of a*ro 
were unable to assemble any reas 
able charge of their armored hnig! 
The French army was pract ici 
annihilated. Sixty-nine years later 



September 1! 



r English again met the French at 



t. Again the English had the 
and the proper tactics and 
^0 French did not. Again, the French 
'lights were virtually annihilated. In 
years the French had neither 
e d nor countered the new Eng- 
weapon. It required another 200 
for the final defeat of the ar- 
knight in the person of Don 
, under the pen of Cervantes. 



1 came upon another example a few 
ago while touring El Morro 
in San Juan, Puerto Ilico. King 
of Spain authorized the con- 
s ti'uction of the castle in 1523. Some 
^O years were spent in raising funds 
build the castle, another 10 or 15 
in designing it, so that the 
fortification was not completed 
il 50 years after it had been au- 
. I have heard comments about 
Jong time sometimes required 
today to got military construction 
authorization and appropriation but 
I think no one can argue that the 
l>aco of technology has increased at 
least a little since 151 Morro was 
built ____ 

. , . Note that the segments of the 
economy increasing most rapidly are 
those in which the most technical ad- 
vancement is occurring electronics, 
communications, chemicals. Segments 
declining are those in which there is 
almost no technological advancement, 
sucli as wooden containers. 

Time scales will be further short- 
ened. This time factor in itself intro- 
duces a new facet in defense plan- 
ning-. It suggests that a nation might 
assure its security simply by advanc- 
ing more rapidly than all potential 
enemies. It is a facet that renders 
opposing forces obsolete by the time 
they are deployed. The opposition is 
outflanked in time, rather than in 
space. This is clearly not the case in 
all fields today, but it is a strong 
factor in many fields. This time fac- 
tor is more important during an all- 
out "war than it is at a time like the 
present. During an all-out war the 
cycle time between offense and de- 
fense is shortened. There is rather 
knowledge of the weapons 
used by the opposition and a 
strong incentive to develop techniques 
a> counter these new weapons. 

In reviewing the classification prob- 
under wartime conditions, I 
like to quote a paragraph from 
;he Deport of the Office of Scientific 



Research and Development (OSRD), 
written in 1946 by the scientists and 
engineers who were engaged in this 
race during World War II. The re- 
port states that "In the midst of war, 
it is clear that the best security lies 
in speed, in achievement, rather than 
in secrecy. That this secrecy can de- 
feat its own purpose is shown by the 
frequency with which enemy scientists 
independently discovered techniques 
zealously guarded by us. Our secrecy 
merely slowed our own production 
and decreased our time advantage." 
I should point out that the fact of 
independent discovery also operates 
in peacetime. The history of tech- 
nology is full of examples of near 
simultaneous discovery by two inde- 
pendent parties. This process is 
doubtless still continuing in certain 
areas. Again referring to wartime 
conditions, the OSKD report states 
that, ". . . Science in its military ap- 
plications as well as in the basic 
form, must be a 'free science' in order 
to be strong. . . . Contributing parties 
must be adequately informed about 
the tactical and technical problems. 
In spite of this obvious fact, there 
was far too much indiscriminate, blind 
classification of military information, 
scientific discoveries, technical equip- 
ment, and correspondence. Not only 
were our civilian scientists given too 
little access to military planning but 
they were also kept in mutual ignor- 
ance of scientific advances in cognate 
fields. Discoveries made in radar 
should have received much wider dis- 
semination to those working in com- 
munications, television, underwater 
sound, and other fields. That these 
discoveries were not so distributed is 
a sad reflection on the scientists them- 
selves who were temporarily forget- 
ful of the very essences of creative 
thinking freedom of publication. No 
one is suggesting unrestricted publi- 
cation in the public journals, but 
surely there could have been a series 
of classified journals, available to all 
cleared scientists, which would have 
broken down artificial and highly in- 
jurious barriers. The writer has per- 
sonal knowledge of many instances 
where greater restricted distribution 
of basic scientific and technological 
data would have profoundly increased 
our scientific strength." Thus, at least 
in the mind of some World War II 
scientists, over-restriction of data did 
have an adverse result. 



A sustained high rate of growth 
also enhances national security by 
promoting the productive and eco- 
nomic growth of the country. Thomas 
Paine once said: "War involves in 
its progress such a train of unfore- 
seen and unsupposed circumstances 
that no human wisdom can calculate 
the end. It has but one tiling certain, 
and that is to increase taxes." How- 
ever, in the past year the United 
States has simultaneously made a 
large increase in our efforts in South- 
east Asia, has cut taxes, and has just 
established a record for revenue in 
a single year. Perhaps our dramatic 
rate of growth lias contradicted Tom 
Paine. 

National security is indeed related 
to overall national strength. And con- 
tinued growth in overall national 
strength is heavily dependent on con- 
tinued rapid advances in technology, 
better transportation, better communi- 
cation, a technology that permits in- 
creased output for every person in 
the labor force and from every bit 
of our natural resources expended. 
This continued technological growth 
requires a free interchange of tech- 
nical information between scientists 
and engineers. 

In conclusion then I would like to 
summarize the points I have made as 
follows: 

* An effective classification policy 
must include consideration of the ef- 
fect that possible restrictions of in- 
formation will have on other technical 
developments. Such restrictions will 
necessarily have some adverse effect 
on the development of your own sys- 
tems for national defense and national 
security. 

* Such restrictions will also neces- 
sarily have an adverse effect on the 
growth of the economy as a whole and 
national security is not unrelated to 
this growth. 

* The requirements for national 
defense an as absolute sense are not 
ends unto themselves but must be 
balanced against other necessarily 
competing requirements such as jus- 
tice, liberty and general warfare. 

I hope I have provided you with 
some added perspective, I have tried 
not to argue for or against any par- 
ticular classification actions, but I 
have tried to point out that future 
technological growth in defense and 
in non-defense industries cannot be 
ignored in arriving at classification 
decisions. 



Industry Bulletin 



17 



by 

Col. Lawrence Vivian, USAF 

Air Force Plant Representative 

Aerojet-General Corporation, Sacramento, Calif. 



My approach to the question of 
whether the aerospace industry can 
meet reliability requirements for 
manned space flight will be to trace 
very briefly the evolution of aero- 
space quality control from the World 
War II techniques of brute force and 
super-saturation through the various 
advances of today's relatively sophis- 
ticated system. I will then outline 
in general terms my assessments of 
the changes which must come about 
if we ai'e to provide the assurance 
that aerospace equipment and mili- 
tary materiel will perform their in- 
tended function for the specified 
mission. 

Prior to World War II, Govern- 
ment contracts had no firm require- 
ment for contractors to employ 
systematic quality control. The Gov- 
ernment automatically re-inspected 
all products 100 percent I The stag- 
gering volume of wartime production 
soon made this completely impossible. 
Thus, the Government was forced to 
a spot-checking technique which 
lacked both depth and thoroughness. 
The weaknesses of this approach cer- 
tainly cost lives and dollars, and our 
sxiccesKCs were achieved only by 
overwhelming volume. 

In the years prior to and during 
the Korean buildup, the need for a 
more sophisticated system became 
apparent. High performance jet air- 
craft were designed for the delivery 
of atomic weapons,, and reliability 
requirements became move impera- 
tive, It was in this environment that 
th (3 Air Force developed its first veal 
quality control system as outlined in 
Specification MIL-Q-5923 ami sub- 
sequent revisions. This system recog- 
nized that quality hardware could only 
bo produced by the contractor's syste- 
matic control of quality. The speci- 
fication, therefore, generally outlined 
requirements for a contractor's sys- 
tem formally incorporating tool and 
guage calibration, material review 
boards, certification of materials and 
special processes, nondestructive test- 



ing, vendor quality reviews, sampling 
plans, etc. 

Within the past dozen years the 
aerospace industry and, in fact, the 
entire nation faced a higher order 
of complexity with even more critical 
demands for reliability. The urgency 
of the requirements called for a va- 
riety of new management techniques, 
including the concept of concurrency 
wherein development, test, production 
and installation could, and frequently 
did, overlap each other. In this en- 
vironment the three Military Services 
agreed on Specification MIL-Q-9858 
(and later 98E8A) which placed sub- 
stantially more responsibility on the 
contractor, requiring that he control 
subcontractors, certify operating spe- 
cialists and vendors, control non-con- 
forming supplies, maintain quality 
cost data, etc. Scrutiny of this system 
by various Government quality repre- 
sentatives varied from one installation 
to the next, soon developing the need 
for more consistent formal applica- 
tion by the Government. To meet this 
need the Air Force developed the 
Contract Management Quality As- 
surance Program augmented by a 
uniform Continuous Audit Program. 
These procedures provided increased 
flexibility for verifying the con- 
tractor's system to the depth required. 
The news from Cape Kennedy and 
Vandenberg remind us from time to 
time that quality assurance has not 
adequately kept pace with the scien- 
tific and technological breakthroughs 
which place us today in the era of 
space flight, both manned and un- 
manned. Despite the inadequacies of 
today's system, however, the record 
is surprisingly good! 

During 1966, out of 64 launches 
conducted by the Air Force's Space 
Systems Division, for example, 61 
were successful. In 1964, the totals 
were equally impressive 66 successes 
out of the 69 National Aeronautics 
and Space. Administration and De- 
fense Department launches performed 
by the Air Force System Command's 
Space Systems Division. 



Over the full two-year period, that's 
127 for 133 or better than 9B percent 
success on the launch pad. 

Included in these totals are some 
phenomenal achievements. The TJioi" 
as a space booster, for instance, had 
39 successes in CY 1964, 29' in CV 
1965, and entered the new year with 
a running total of 70 consecutive 
successful launches. Atlas was 19 for 
19 in 1964, and 15 for 17 in 1965. 
And in more recent months, all ten 
Gemini launch vehicles have per- 
formed flawlessly. 

A word, however, about our fail- 
ures. All satisfactory launches clo not 
connote complete success. Unless \ve 
achieve complete payload performance 




Air Force Atlas Agena. 



18 



September 194 



as planned, our mission is not com- 
plete. Despite sophisticated telemetry, 
there are cases whore unmanned 
space vehicles have failed to perform 
as planned and we simply do not know 
why. 

In such a case, corrective action 
can be a baffling challenge. Solutions 
may be sought through design analy- 
sis, simulated operation in the labora- 
tory, or even replacement of the 
suspicious unit(s) with others where 
previous experience has been more 
successful. There is no uniform ap- 
proach especially in view of tight pro- 
gram schedules. 

A review of quality assurance 
techniques applied to date points out 
the fact that almost the entire effort 
is expanded in the search for non- 
quality, i.e., the detection of defects. 
Where our detection fails us, we see, 
at the worst, catastrophic failure of 
extremely costly hardware, not to 
mention casualties and, at the best, 
costly program delay. A truism that 
lias survived, though not without chal- 
lenge, is that we cannot inspect 
quality into hardware. 

Even if we overlook the possibility 
of catastrophic failure, the cost of 



program delay which defective hard- 
ware can produce staggers the imag- 
ination. For example, it is generally 
recognized that a manned flight to 
Mars will involve an expenditure of 
apjiroxinmtely $50 billion over a 15- 
year period, or $10 million per day. 
All of this effort would culminate in 
the flight of less than 10 spacecraft 
from Earth to Mars. Thus, the na- 
tional investment in each would repre- 
sent a minimum of $5 billion an un- 
thinkable amount to be lost clue to 
poor quality that will result in unre- 
liability. 

The manned Mars mission would be 
further complicated by the fact that 
launch windows, of approximately 45 
days duration, occur only once each 
two years. Thus, the launch vehicles 
must not only be launched reliably, 
but they must also IJG launched in a 
timely manner. The cost, at $10 mil- 
lion a day, of unreliability in timeli- 
ness in meeting the launch window 
is as grnat as the investment in tbe 
vehicle itself. 

Let us consider for a moment the 
statistics of reliability. Consider a 
modest space vehicle composed of 
eight major components, i.e., ground 




Gemini Titan II. 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



Air Force Thor Agena. 



launch system, propulsion, guidance 
control, power, supplies, etc. All are 
extremely complex, some more than 
others. To oversimplify, let's say that 
each of these major components has 
six subassemblies. We must assume 
that each subassembly must perform 
properly to assure system-reliable 
performance. If each of these sub- 
assemblies has a reliability of 99 per- 
cent, the total system reliability will 
be only slightly more than fiO percent. 
Fifteen years ago an analysis of 
these figures proved to many that such 
a system, like the bumblebee, could 
not fly. Yet it has been done. We know 
it can be done with even more com- 
plex systems. The successful Gemini 
program provides the most recent 
and certainly the; most dramatic evi- 
dence. Tf we are to overcome the sta- 
tistics of reliability, it is imperative 
that we provide an atmosphere, an 
environment where a relative relia- 
bility goal of 100 percent can be ap- 
proached. 

The pursuit of this goal during re- 
cent years lias produced techniques 
which permit reasonably good predic- 
tions of system reliability through 
design analysis. These techniques en- 
able us to pinpoint high failure com- 
ponents which, in turn, generate de- 
sign changes such as redundancy, 
longer life parts, more resistant ma- 
terials and self- reorganizing systems. 
Use of these techniques can be effec- 
tive in the solution of our reliability 
problems. Tho trl-Scrvlco MIL-STD- 
785, "Reliability Program Require- 
ments," stipulates the uso of those 
techniques and is being applied to the 
development of major weapon systems 
and space vehicles. 

Knowing that many of you may bo 
driving new model automobiles, I 
hesitate to point to the automotive 
industry. However, the major motor 
companies are now guaranteeing 
material 1 and workmanship for 24 
months or 24,000 miles. As with all 
guarantees, you may find some small 
print in the contract. Nevertheless, 
ns the cost of making- good those 
guarantees is charged back to the 
manufacturing operation, we see in- 
centives to produce reliable hardware 
that cannot be ignored. A quality con- 
trol manager from one of the major 
motor companies said to me, "The 
dollar is a universal document! Even 
a vice president can understand it" 

(Continued on Paye 33) 



19 



by 

Capt. Dick G. Wilson, USN 
Office of Chief of Naval Material 



The formal establishment of REW- 
SON began with the acknowledgement 
by the Chief, Bureau of Naval Weap- 
ons (BuWeps) in 1964, of a need for 
a central coordination authority. The 
need was for a coordinated effort in 
certain related areas which bad not 
yet been acknowledged as being of 
prime importance in the naval plan- 
ner's mind, as bad the more obvious 
need for ships, submarines and air- 
craft, The related areas addressed are 
combined in the acronym EEWSON, 
standing for Reconnaissance, Elec- 
tronic Warfare, Special Operations 
and Nava! Intelligence Processing 
Systems. Recognizing the vital role to 
be played by a REWSON concept, in 
1964 an office was established in 
BuWeps and a Project Management 
Office (PM-7) in the Office of the 
Chief of Naval Material. This was 
followed closely by initiation of a 
REWSON office in the Office of the 
Chief of Naval Operations (CNO). 

The functions of REWSON can be 
likened generally to the functions of 
the sensory or nerve system of the 
body, REWSON systems are the nerve 
fibers which make weapon system 
platforms into effective individual op- 
erating 1 units as well as effective parts 
of a coordinated fleet. The REWSON 
concept acknowledges the need for 
this integrating fiber and fulfills this 
need by working intimately with the 
fleet environment from a physical and 
enemy-threat point of view. 

The reconnaissance sensors of ships, 
submarines, planes, satellites and 
shore stations must have adequate 
capabilities, and their outputs must 
be correlated and displayed in such 
a manner as to permit timely analy- 
sis and reaction. Only when naviga- 
tional grid systems, resolutions, accu- 
racies, data rates, time of intercept, 
etc., are known nnd compatible 
throughout will the tactical picture 
have meaning to the tactical com- 
mander. And only when such informa- 
tion is accessible in a timely manner 
will it be operationally valuable. There- 



fore, information, once gathered by 
tactical reconnaissance platforms, 
must he rapidly processed and dis- 
seminated. A system of naval intelli- 
gence processing and transmission 
(NIPS) is required to do this. 

The fleet commander now has 
quickly obtained his own tactical re- 
connaissance data for the specific 
geographic area of concern; he has 
processed and integrated it with the 
data base of strategic intelligence; and 
he is now ready for operational plan- 
ning. He is able to plan his resources 
to fit the geographic and enemy en- 
vironment which he knows exists for 
day-to-day operations. He is able to 
put together a total picture and, 
equally important, the picture is 
current. 

The element of surprise must be ex- 
ploited to the maximum extent pos- 
sible for each sortie in order to 
maximize the target kill probability. 
To accomplish this, the fleet com- 
mander must utilize his electronic 



warfare capability by identifying arid 
locating; threats and targets, lie must 
also coordinate his electronic warfare 
systems to nullify, confuse nml (re- 
ceive the enemy defenses, This en- 
hances survivability and, thereby, in- 
creases the cost effective i ui.ss of a 
given mission. 

Special operations cmcompnss thc- 
othcr terms of REWSON, SIIKO .' pa- 
cm! operations are often planned ar,A 
executed to roconnoiter, to tfatht-r 
specific intelligence information, or to 
execute electronic warfare or olhe: 
special missions. Special opcialmr.s 
may utilize the special forcr.i of the 
amphibious-type commanders, or tfu-y 
may utilise in a special way th-? 
more conventional forces nf nlht; 
type commanders, i.e., uircraft car- 
riers, submarines, etc. 

Obviously, the entire IlKWSON ef- 
fort is complex since not only (leva 
the enemy use the entire elect rons^ 
no-tic spectrum, but so do nil plat- 
forms, of our forces. Thn effcclive 




\_ 



RECONNAISSANCE ELECTRONIC WARFARE SPECIAL OWATIOHS. 

I V 




20 



September 1964 



realization of a REWSON capability 
y is necessarily the result of many years 
of intelligence gathering and analysis, 
of systems planning and integration, 
and of tactical training and doctrine 
development. The sum of these spells 
fleet readiness. This can only be ac- 
complished after years of coordinated 
effort Imagine, if you can, in this 
world of ever expanding technology, 
what the 1970's and 1980's hold for 
our Navy. Then imagine what it 
would be like if there were no orga- 
nization which acknowledged the 
complexity of coordinating KEWSON 
efforts. 

The REWSON organization since 
its inception formally acknowledged 
that REWSON requirements must be 
compatible from ship to submarine to 
aircraft to satellite. It acknowledged 
that development, procurement, test 
and evaluation, training and doctrine 
development cannot live in a vacuum, 
and that the integrating fiber of the 
fleet nerves must be planned in all 
commands at all levels from concept 
to fleet capability. The operating 
Navy and the material Navy both 
need an organization capable of early 
recognition of REWSON require- 
ments and of rapid development of the 
equipment, system, or tactic to fulfill 
these requirements. Had the need for 
this REWSON organization not been 
recognized and had wo failed to acti- 
vate such an organization, the Im- 
ponderables of intelligence and se- 
curity, of indecision and of no action 
might have seriously impaired the 
Navy's role in national defense. How- 
ever, with the recognition of the vital 
role to be played by the REWSON 
organization, great strides have been 
made and plans are well under way 
for adapting REWSON to the new 
systems commands. 

In addition, there has been a recog- 
nition of the need for other REWSON 
resources. The several Navy labora- 
tories and centers are being tasked 
and organized to be responsive to 
the fleet requirements. Quick Reac- 
tion Capability procedures for REW- 
SON equipments and systems are 
being finalized at the Secretarial and 
Chief of Naval Operations levels, and 
wilt provide definitive guidance, via 
the CNO Quick Reaction Capability 
Board, to the Commander, Naval Ma- 
terial Command, for five-day contracts 
in the most urgent instances. The re- 
sources of industry are being mar- 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



shalleil to provide both analytical 
and hardware assistance in meeting 
the demands of REWSON require- 
ments of the fleet. 

To summarize, the REWSON con- 
cept lias caused the entire Navy to 
recognize the need for a coordinated 
systems approach in this area. Com- 
mands have responded to this by 
org-anixing to accommodate this need. 
The operating and material Navy has 
not only ted the way at the headquar- 
ters level but has also tasked the 
field facilities, laboratories and con- 
tractors to be responsive to the con- 



cept and to the need for quick 
performance. 

The requirement for a REWSON 
organization has always existed even 
though formal recognition of this need 
for integrated management is only 
two years old. Organizationally it is 
a newcomer, but it is healthy and 
strong, and has already made an in- 
valuable contribution to the Vietna- 
mese conflict. The future is even more 
promising as we provide for the 
REWSON requirements of the fleet 
by directing REWSON resources from 
a central office. 




Under the impact of the Southeast 
Asia military forces buildup, procure- 
ment for the Defense Supply Agency 
(pSA) during FY 1966 rose to $5.7 
billion compared with a total procure- 
ment for the previous fiscal year of 
$3 billion. 

The Defense Supply Agency pur- 
chases and distributes to the Military 
Services commonly used supplies in- 
cluding food, clothing and textiles, 
electronic parts, fuel and petroleum 
products, medical, chemical, industrial, 
construction and general supplies. 

Civilian employment also increased 
during thfi past fiscal year, mainly the 
result of activation of additional De- 
fense Contract Administration Serv- 
ices Regions (DCASR's) in the field 
between July 1 and the end of the cal- 
endar year. 

Total DSA civilian employment at 
the end of FY 1066 was 52,425 full- 
time employees, as compared to 33,230 
in the previous year. The number of 
military personnel during this period 
rose from 898 to 1,129. About 15,000 
of the civilian and military personnel 
were added as a result of the DCASR 
activations. 

With the completion of the DCAS 
consolidation during the fiscal year, 
DSA was administering a total of 



225,000 contracts of the Army, Navy, 
Air Force, DSA, and the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration 
through a network of 11 regions span- 
ning the United States. 

The number of supply requisitions 
processed rose to 19.4 million during 
the fiscal year, a jump from the 15.4 
million figure of the previous year. 

An innovation was the activation 
of the Red Ball Express, a speed-up 
logistics system which enables DSA to 
furnish at high speed desperately 
needed items of equipment being used 
in Vietnam. From inception of the ex- 
press, on Dec. 7, 1965, to the end of 
the fiscal year, the system received 
61,806 requisitions and supplied 49,005 
for a 95.6 percent record. 

In the overall handling of supplies 
by DSA, there was a system-wide in- 
crease amounting to 2,384,900 tons 
shipped in FY 1966 as compared to 
1,575,300 tons in the previous fiscal 
year. During the same period, DSA 
received 2,667,200 tons in FY 1966 in 
comparison to a previous 1,404,000 
tons. 

Inventory value remained at $2 bil- 
lion during the periods of comparison, 
while the number of items centrally 
managed dropped from 1,4 million in 
FY 1965 to 1.8 in the past fiscal year, 



Procurement totals from all Defense 


Supply Agency 


centers rose 


during FY 1966. A comparative breakdown 


follows : 






FY 1966 


FY 1966 


Activity 


(millions) 


(millions) 


Defense Construction Supply Center 


$ 171.1 


$ 687.5 


Defense Electronics Supply Center 


134.7 


223.0 


Defense Fuel Supply Center 


1,165.7 


1,302.7 


Defense General Supply Center 


145.7 


519.9 


Defense Industrial Supply Center 


117.0 


323.6 


Defense Personnel Support Center 






Clothing 


317.2 


1,176.6 


Medical 


121.7 


225.5 


Subsistence 


839.4 


1,222.0 


SPUR (Special Purchases-Overseas Use) 


18.9 


41.9 


Other 


11.0 


17.7 



21 



Systems Analysis 



(Continued from Page 3} 



systems analysis until we know at 
least what the initial alternatives are. 
Helping on that problem, I believe, 
is a major role for industry. 

I might also note that it is in our 
mutual interest to approach the de- 
velopment *>? now systems in this 
way. We think it improves our 
chances of making the best choices 
and getting programs established on 
firm ground from the start. And it 
wHmiH to me that you would cer- 
tainly ]) refer to participate in pro- 
Knims which have the best chance 
of lininjf successful and entering into 
substantial procurement 

A Hccom! way in which industry can 
contribute, to our mutual advantage, 
is by the application of the principles 
of syttteniH amilynis to tho design of 
weapon systems and components. It 
IK, of course, true that we are inter- 
ottUHl in accomplish in K the necessary 
military tasks at the minimum cost, 
and I do not thinlc that you, as citi- 
zens and taxpayers, would have it 
any other way. But I sense that there 
ia considerable misunderstanding of 
our attention to coat. Too often our 
rnlualiuice to recommend a so-called 
"boHt" system ia inLerprctetl as simply 
tin effort lt> hold tho budjjct down. 
Much of this impression, I believe, 
art HOD out of a confusion between 
"tho liRHt in tho way of a single item 
of hardware" and "the best in tho 
way of an overall force." Sometimes, 
this beat overall force may be com- 
powfid of a relatively small number of 
vnry capable units; other times, the 
IwHt force may bo composed of a 
rather larger number of units of 
lower individual capability. There is 
shnply no rule-of- thumb that will 
always bo right; you have to examine 
each CHKR on its own merits, 

When we compare alternative sys- 
tmyiH, wo are intoroBtod in what we 
gnt for what we pay. It seems to me 
Ihnt you in industry should be in a 
unique position to determine which 
charactodstica havo an important ef- 
fect on cont, to take a critical look 
at elements which add to the cost 
without a commensurate increase in 
effectiveness, and to suggest new ap- 
proachoa to u bettor balance between 
unit effectiveness and overall force 
olTcictivenos. t realize that many of 
you havo vnluc engineering: activities, 
and I would not want to minimize 
their desirability nor their impor- 



tance. Rather, I am suggesting that 
there are even greater possibilities 
in examining the relationship between 
cost and effectiveness in the concep- 
tual stages of weapon development. 

The third way in which I think in- 
dustry can contribute to our -use of 
systems analysis lies in the relation- 
ship between systems analysis and 
contracting. This is an area in which 
some pi-ogresa has been made but the 



untapped potential seems to me 
be very large, provided that we 
work it out together. 

In the past, without the beuefi 
systems analysis techniques, 
weapon systems were selected 
marily on the basis of perform 
characteristics. For example, a I 
tic aircraft would be describe-! 
terms of range, payload, speed, 
so on, but without any specific; 



INCENTIVE STRUCTURE 

TOTAL PROFIT = ACCURACY PRORT+RELIABILITY PROFIT 
PROFIT PROFIT 




.5 1.0 

(POOR) (GOOD) 

ACCURACY 



.5 1.0 

(POOR) (GOOD) 

RELIABILITY 



Figure 1. 



CURVE OF CONSTANT 
EFFECTIVENESS 




.2 .4 .6 

RELIABILITY 



Septeml 



way by which 1 mean are higher 
profits really tied to a more effective 
system? To answer that, let's look at 
how accuracy and reliability couple 
to determine effectiveness (Figure 2). 

Here I have shown a plot of accu- 
racy versus reliability, and have 
drawn a curve of constant effective- 
ness by which I mean that any com- 
bination of accuracy and reliability 
which falls on this curve will result 
in the same percentage of missiles 
hitting their targets. Note that if 
the reliability is low, the accuracy 
has to be high (the upper left end of 
the curve) and that if the accuracy 
is low, the reliability has. to be high 
(the lower right end of the curve). 
The point is that, in this simplified ex- 
ample, the Government's real concern 
is not just accuracy, or just relia- 
bility, but how many missiles hit' the 
target. Whether the given level of 
effectiveness is obtained by getting 
off a lot of missiles, only a few of 
which hit, or by getting off a few 
missiles, most of which hit, should be 
a matter of secondary concern. At 
least as a first approximation, one 
combination of accuracy and relia- 
bility anywhere along this curve 
should be as satisfactory to the Gov- 
ernment as any other point. 

Keeping the general shape of the 
curve in mind for the moment, let 
us return to the incentive structure 
I outlined before (Figure 8). On this 
graph I have combined the two in- 
centives which I showed separately in 
the first graph. Here, within the par- 
allelogram, there is a slewed coor- 
dinate system. The more nearly hori- 
zontal coordinates correspond to. the 
various degrees of accuracy from zero 
to 1.0, while the more nearly vertical 
coordinates correspond to the various 
degrees of reliability from zero to 1.0. 
Thus, all the possible combinations of 
accuracy and reliability fall some- 
where "within this parallelogram. This 
is really nothing more than a graph- 
ical way of adding up the two sepa- 
rate incentives to determine the total 
profit. 

Having established this slewed co- 
ordinate system, with accuracy run- 
ning one way, and reliability running 
the other, I can plot on it the curve 
from the last figure, which shows the 
various combinations of accuracy and 
reliability which result in the given 
degree of effectiveness (Figure 4). 

I think that this is an interesting 
result. Remember that because any 



one point along the curve results in 
the same effectiveness as any other, 
the Government should have no par- 
ticular reason to prefer any one point 
over any other nor should it be 
willing to pay any more for one point 
than for any other. Yet notice how 
great a spread in profits there could 
be, in spite of the fact that there is 
no corresponding spread in effective- 
ness. 

But to show how perverse this con- 
tracting arrangement really could be 
(Figure 5), I have added a second 
curve of constant effectiveness this 
one showing all the combinations of 
accuracy and reliability which would 
result in a missile just twice as ef- 
fective as any falling on the first 
curve. (For any given reliability, the 
accuracy is twice as good, and vice 
versa.) I have also shown how much 
profit results from two particular mis- 
sile designs. To emphasize the point, 
I have picked the two that rep- 
resent the extreme case. One missile 
falls at the top of the first curve, 
and the contractor derives a profit of 
a little over seven units. The second 
missile falls at the bottom of the 
second curve, and the contractor de- 
rives a profit of only about fom- units, 
even though it is twice as effective 
as the first missile. 

This sort of incentive structure is 
clearly undesirable. Although the idea 
of inducing the contractor to increase 
both accuracy and reliability, in this 
hypothetical example, is a good thing, 
we must go further than that and 



consider the relationship between the 
two. This can be done through sys- 
tems analysis and, if the relationship 
between industry and the Government 
is to be mutually profitable, we must 
match the contracting incentives, not 
simply to a series of intermediate 
parameters, but to the job to "be done. 

Of course, this is more easily said 
than clone. Just how rapidly we can, 
or should, move in this direction, and 
how far we should go, is unclear at 
this time. I have already noted the 
essentiality of some relatively unam- 
biguous way of measuring the degree 
to which the product meets the cri- 
teria, and some of the criteria used 
in systems analyses are considerably 
more difficult to measure than are 
such classic parameters as grass 
weight or top speed. In addition, we 
would have to give careful considera- 
tion to the problem of "rule boating" 
by which I mean taking care to 
avoid the possibility of being able to 
meet the letter of the guarantee with- 
out meeting the spirit of the systems 
analysis behind it. 

In any event, I would like to make 
it absolutely clear that my purpose 
is not to announce a new contracting 
policy, but rather to stimulate some 
new thoughts on an old problem: how 
to get the most defense from the re- 
sources available to us, What I would 
like to see is not a precipitous and 
revolutionary change in contracting 
procedures, but rather a sober con- 
sideration of the alternatives open to 
(Continued on Page 33) 



PROFIT 




/"2X" EFFECTIVENESS 
'X 11 EFFECTIVENESS 



\ 



^ 



^ 



'RELIABILITY 



Figure 5. 



24 



September 1966' 




by 

Clyde Bothmer 

Executive Secretary 

Defense Industry Advisory Council 



Some Defense contractors will 
breathe a sigh upon seeing the above 
acronym and conclude in despair that 
another "cult" is being introduced 
into their already complicated lives. 
READ ON! Nothing could be further 
from the truth. 

' At a Department of Defense/Na- 
tional Security Industrial Associa- 
tion Symposium in May 1966, the key- 
note speaker, Mr, Tom Morris, then 
with private industry, but before and 
since an Assistant Secretary of De- 
fense, made the following statement: 

"While tliis symposium is con- 
sidering the technical informa- 
tion prohlem and the approaches 
to its solution, I recommend that 
it contribute new thinking, if pos- 
sible, to non-technical data prob- 
lems as well, I refer to the data 
requirements of management sys- 
toms or programs, such as those 
[ concerned with Quality Assur- 
ance, Reliability, Maintainability, 
Value Engineering, Pert-Cost, 
Configuration Management, and 
the Integrated Logistic Concept," 
Subsequent Defense Department 
speakers at that same symposium 
pointed out that the newly-created 
DOD Council on Technical Data and 
Standardization, and the Office of 
Technical Data and Standardization 
Policy, under the Assistant Secretary 
of Defense (Installations and Logis- 
tics), were carefully tailored steps 
aimed at bringing order into the re- 
quirements levied on defense contrac- 
tors for technical data. 

The Defense Department has more 
recently focused attention on the 
"non-technical data problems" re- 
ferred to by Mr. Morris. Assistant 
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) 
Robert N. Anthony has created an 
Office of the Deputy Assistant Secre- 
tary (Management Systems Develop- 
ment) with important responsibilities 
in this area. The Comptroller's inter- 
eat in management systems goes 
much beyond the need to assess the 
financial impact of Defense programs. 
To assure that Defense resources are 
used effectively and efficiently, actions 
5 are in process under Mr. George W. 
Berffquist, the Deputy Assistant Sec- 
retary for Management Systems De- 
velopment, to attack reports prolifera- 
tion problems with improvements in 
management systems design. 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



_ The direction of future collabora- 
tion to obtain relief for contractors 
from management systems implemen- 
tation problems is being: explored 
jointly by DOD representatives and a 
CODSIA (Council of Defense and 
Space Industry Associations) group. 
In addition, a special DOD group has 
completed a study which identified 
the management information needs of 
project managers. Other actions will 
he under way shortly, 

Further, the Defense Industry Ad- 
visory Council (DIAC) (See Defenw 
Industry Bulletin, April 1966) has de- 
voted considerable attention to a re- 
port of tho Aerospace Industries 
Association (AIA) dealing with Gov- 
ernment nmnagement systems and 
data requirements incident thereto. 
Further work with AIA and other in- 
terested associations will be under- 
taken in this area by Defense. Dep- 
uty Secretary of Defense Cyrus II. 
Vance, in his role as Chairman of 
the DIAC, will continue to seek advice 
from the council as significant points 
are developed by this joint effort. 

It is apparent, therefore, that 
paperwork problems in both the tech- 
nical and management systems areas 
are under attack. It should also be 
pointed out that these are coordinated 
attacks, as they necessarily must be, 
since the line between technical and 
management systems data require- 
ments is by no means a completely 
distinct one. But even with these com- 
plementary efforts, are all appropriate 
steps being taken to reduce to 1 an ab- 
solute minimum the paperwork bur- 
den on defense contractors and sub- 
contractors ? 

Assistant Secretary of Defense (In- 
stallations and Logistics) Paul R. 
Ignatius doesn't think so. In response 
to Congressional inquiries in this re- 
gard, he described some of the above 
points, but went on to say that "the 
task is a never-ending one." Accord- 
ingly, he has directed that further 
efforts he undertaken to assure "that 
we obtain no more data from contrac- 
tors than is essential to carry out 
our responsibility for effective man- 
agement of our procurement pro- 
gram." 

In response to this direction a num- 
ber of steps are being taken. For 
example, a subcommittee of the 
Armed Services Procurement Regula- 



tion Committee has been formed to 
examine contractual requirements 
and to do several case studies, Con- 
sideration is being given to asking 
a working group of the DIAC to help 
m this effort. The requirements for 
data levied by components of the vast 
contract administration field organiza- 
tion of the Defense Department are 
being examined in some detail. 

A post-award examination of the 
first major contract handled under the 
Total Package Procurement Concept 
("Total Package Concept" by Major 
General Charles H. Terhune, Jr., 
USAF, Defense, Industry Bulletin, 
February 1966) revealed not only that 
excessive paperwork requirements 
were levied, but that the proposers 
submitted considerably more data 
than was required. Assistant Secre- 
tary of the Air Force (Installations 
and Logistics) Robert H. Charles told 
a DIAC meeting on this point: "The 
fact that each competitor submitted 
an average of 7,000 pages of cost 
data, in a competition for a fixed- 
price contract, speaks for itself." This 
Air Force post-award examination 
was so productive that other similar 
reviews will be made particularly 
aimed at uncovering areas of exces- 
sive paperwork burden. 

As a further measure, the Office of 
the Secretary of Defense (OSD) has 
kept a hand on both throttle and 
brake in the program using Cost In- 
formation Reports to improve the 
DOD store of cost performance data 
on large systems acquisitions con- 
tracts. OSD approval is required 
before actual data collection require- 
ments may be written into new con- 
tracts. The OSD Data Plan Review 
Committee is now an active regula- 
tory mechanism at the Pentagon. 

As other fruitful areas for investi- 
gation appear, they will be examined 
in line with Secretary Ignatius' di- 
rective. However, all such efforts will 
move forward with two principles 
regularly observed. 

First, any such examination will be 
made in coordination with the major 
program involving technical and man- 
agement systems data previously de- 
scribed so that duplieative efforts are 
avoided. 

Second, none of these examinations 
will be handled in such a way as to 
generate, in themselves, additional 
paperwork requirements. 

As Secretary Ignatius stated in 
regard to the control of paperwork, 
"the task is a never-ending one." A 
major part of the solution must al- 
ways be found, therefore, in a never- 
ending search for ways to minimize 
and eliminate. This article was writ- 
ten, in part, merely to focus attention 

(Continued on Page 27) 



25 




/V/f'HHf I't'lH'IDTlHt'Ht (Hint/Ill' No. 
41!, -luae ,'tO, I !)(}(>. (I) Small Hlisine;;s 
Ki/.i- SUindanls. (1!) (!n;iliiiK ol' Special 
Facilities as Wind Tunneh; and Com- 
puter. (;!) Kijiml I'linplnyntenl (tppur- 
tuiiily. (I) I'lv-Award Survey;;. 

Di'ft'iiiH' I'mi-iin-nii'iil Circular No, 
!>?, Alii-;. :.!:!, MMUi. (I) Distribution nf 
Procurement, lineaments. {:!) Sliip- 
nieiit.'i I'rnni the United Slate.'i IV 
OvcnirtiH Mi-livery. (.'() Overtime He. 
UUV Incurred liy Contractor.'! in (la 1 
I'erfonnam I' Defen;;e <!oiilnid;i. 

Much Uefen.'io Trociiri'ineiil. Cir- 
cular i;: di'si|-ned to place new i,r 
clmnj-eil policy or prneedmvs in H'.. 

l ' ( ' l 'l- Pi''""' l(> (Ullilieali f an 

Armi'd Services 1'niniremenl. Scrv^ 
ices I'l'in'iiretneiit. l!ee,u!al ion (AS 
TU) revision. ASI'K ..lulisi-riln-rs 
will receive DI'C'ji ami ASI'll re- 
viHiunii HirnilKll Hie SU|)erintelnleul 
nf Documents, U, S. (Invi'mnii'iit 
I'l'inlinjV (Mllce, Wiutliini'ton, ]},('. 
IHMIW. 



MS'/I l-'ii'lil Kiiltililinltinnil /JI'ITC- 
I <>!'n UellectM each USA lirld activity 
liy level ilesin-nalioM, inailine, adilrcmi 
mi'wuivi^addres:; and li'lrpimur num-' 
l>ei's. I'HKi. ;|^; j,. (!|||ii|,,j V N ((I H7,i;/7; 
lil!li,l! .'Hl(' 

hiftinti,- Si<i>i>o,-l ,,f I/,,* \',n'it, j'nlt' 
liiilii'il liy tin- Hun-tut nf Naval I'er 
iionni-1, Ihiii repurl [irovideji a dnirrlp- 
lion of Navy loj-inlic ii(t|i}iurl in (inli-r 
l'i tuniisli it conunini iindenilan.liuc. 
(H'l'init nlciilJltcalioa of iinililein areas 
iiiiiM'nnii a luisia fur an overall plan 
lur iniimivenii'iil. ItHili. Ittll p. <! a (al<i|; 

(/,.V, (Ittt't'i'HiiwHl I'ttrclittuhiii nnil 
.S'(i/|.,<i Ilii'irltn-ii. A coniprelieiKiivi' 
mnde (or tlu> (iuiall htiiiiuciiji tliat 
wutiln to iiftl lo Hie Federal (iovern-' 
|('it nr Imy propnrly lieintr unlil hv 
i'| (.ovitrninent. Induili-ti lialiiiKu o'f 

UK' Jiiiliiary and civilian 'aj'em-ie'if. 
l.Jtifi. I;IH p, cliitnlon' No. SHA 1.1 ,v 
-iiiMifi. 7()(i. ' 

{ttiwrninrti.!, .S'ciVrc mill I'ttlilfa 

I'nhru, A rom|iitalinn O f ,,,,,. ,.,.. 

are, for tic* iieventh ined.inn' of (I,,. 

I nnel on Science and 'I'ei'hii.ilufy pn-., 

willed in (lie CoirimitU n Science 

anil AiiLrnuauticii, U.S. House, of H,-p. 
re.'ii'iitntivcii, M!)tli (Joiijtn'HH, !!ial JHS- 
Kiuji, votiroriiin^ (tovoniiticiil 'ieienn- 
ami pul.lic policy, Ht(i([, RH p/flataloir 
Nd, \ d.Hcia:({7'l. !()(' 

Fi'ilt'inl- llnwllwilc fur timull Hunt- 
/'. lliiH Hui-vcy Mi'nvideu Infttnnu- 
tiriii on all Hi., l-Vdnnil iir< m m H of 
intjUHHl in Miiull ki.'iiiie.'iM. H(iv. Illliti 
';! !;. fltttnloK No. Y- 



f 'In' niii'iil in Ctnitlmt. till*. /'.,S'. 

A I' III If ill \\'l>l'l,l M'rl,' //, Chi lllii'iit 

II (M'/r/M ,SYr i '/,-c, Tlit;; v< i hi IMC ilr 
.scrilii's (In 1 unii|iii' |ni;.i| inn ,,\' || M ;, 
Si-rvici. in World War II. liuiti. ilii 1 ; p. 
ratalnj-, Nn. I>1 M,V:( '.|;|. v.;i, $l>.;'.li. 

MII^TItll'. Mil,!!,,,,/ ST.in.i,,,,! 
l\'rtiiliuiln>ninti mill launi- I'rix-t'tlitrt'::, 
('iniinii' /-', il/iTi/ /, li'iH;, MHit!. UK! |i' 
falalii)-; Nn. 1 1', 1 . (I, ! : Mi,|l di.i:!, : : :i. ;'!<. 

A fin n I 'rot- n 1 1 in, nt I'IKI'I tin 1 1 , 

('fiiiiifH' \', -l/rMT/i .;'.'., HUM. IV() p. Culii' 





Tii/'oiilitl rittniiii^ I'-nitinmiK 11! ti'itli 
lintatiiiti Muffin-It*- I-' it lif. (iiiuifiiiii 
Scli-iililV !Wp,. Simla Ana. I'j.lif i',,, 1 
H"' Air Knnv. April Miiiti. \\t M , 
"rder N,,. AH (i.'i;! .'('/!). W. 

>f .l.-t.'i, ,S'/o !;-:, 



.(-, 

' :ttll ; . '"' I'"' Navy, April IDflJi, 
I'f- ""I' 1 ' 1 N". AH .|i;i, MI;, 51, ' 

,,/' ...... ' I 1 '"'"', >7' /l1 'I'mu'lihg 

!><,> I mini li,,,,,!,-. Ni lvl ,i ()l , (] '. 

""V 1 ;'', 1 ;"'""'"''"'.^. i'-nmii, <:nllf.,Miiy 
I."'*-, ... PP. Unl.T N,,, A 



.., i-.. w 

\<M'1 (lily, I'm- Ilin Air l-'nn-...' A|.ii! 
_[!"', ll-l MM. Oi-ilcr No. All li:i:i Vu:i. 



'" lt ''- l Al'iil l!Hlii, I.',' pp. Oni,,,. w 

f ii;i;; -ntii. , i :i;i. 



nlil jiHm, 

'.'lii'ia! Mnl.ii-!> S..-1 DpL-ralioilii IWL 
.xiiilM Iliirlmni. Calil 1 ,. f,,,. ||,,, M Jlv 




., 
|{).;;,.| t n-h rn.jri-| i Af.-nrv 

;, 4H I.IL dnl.-r N.., AM ti:i:f 



iintiiii. 

ii.'l I,i.ha, Wul.TvIM A r;,,. .ml, ( \' y 
|irll t[ l!Kil!, ,|-| pp. (>,.,[,,,. Nn< A)) ,;.,;! 

hiflitt'nn- f .S'l.iKr I'lwavinii \'n>: 
'lnt />/, f/ (r l-;tn>nlr,l <!<! /,', 
'/.j'fri/M,r .S'/,VH H t o/ l'lh; t f:,n 
-nitltnin lli,v.-.. Naval Air |.; M ,.| 

'- 



rin-iiiirtil Ami- 

'I " "I ( ..n/ifi /.',((, .I//,,,,..,, NitvillKfr 

''invh l.jirWiiory, \Va:.liii)|:| () |i, 1), (! 
*lmvli linn;, H, |,p. ( i n | ( , r Nt) A |). 
il.'il tniv. ./I. 



. , , ., 

i !"''. UK MM. "nler Nn. AlM;;i;i jm:!. &i. 

lHt't'*lti,Hitinn nf tin- fV,,/*, I'',,/!,,,,,' 
i nil >-initwn-:i,- !'>,.,>, ,1!, :, }' ,\l,\i 
I /",/,,, ,/ r,,l/., /'/ (1 /,/,f A',,',,. 
/'"(n/ .-Winfititififi, I'fiii,-,! Ativiitt'l Ur 
i; 1 ; 1 "' 1 ' 11 ''"''-'I f'H 1 the Nnvy, ,\I V Illiitl. 
!M lip, tintiT Nn. AlMi:t:i IMI, 5:1. 



i "1'j.,, NiiiTiti.ir.nh,, Cuiir., i'nf UK! Air 
I'Hiv,.. Miitcti liiiili, ::-HI pii. (tnlnrNo. 
Ad i.'.fi MI..I. : ; :ii, 

.1 I "Hi lt> ,;,i<ilii>i,iti,i,t i,, i N/O'/fKY,'. 
M"-<illl rnix.-n.Hy, Mnillreal, Climuln, 
tfi- II,.- Air I-'MIY... N,,v. Ifllii,, 4V pp, 

' irittT NM, A n ii:m :i::!i, ft:;, 



N'MVItl liiUlinli.f- trill |)i<|'f)t;<(< l.lllllinl- 

I'-i'.v. Jifin (''rnin-tM-u, Citlil',. Nnv, liUil), 

-I" PI-. nnl.'i- Nn. AIM.':* :ilil. ?!!. 



:' 1 ,"/' "( -Vi-/HiV Wtntwit*. 
..... I All-mill Kernel! |.,,|, : , f,,,. ,|,,, 

\ n'fc./ 1'!!!! 1 '; l(il1 - ' I'P- ""!"' Nu. 
A I i'ii,i. I !,;!'(. i;^;. 

.-t iM, H M f llf //. ,,(, . 
/n;/m/ urn/ .So'/',,',- 

'{' H ///( H ,'lvr,*. ej...!-., 

ivrmliy for UK- Navy, April I HI 
. "rdrr No. AI.(J:iV(lll ' 



>|iy f i(.. ; i J.ahN. for Ll, t 



26 




I'- p;u Iin-'lil nf ( 'niiiini'l'i'c 

l, Vit. IJyiM 
'^'d !Mi|) rnnlnM'torfuiwI 
iiiiiy Mliluin lilt-si' ilocu- 



Ati*>iaiiilriit, Vu. 



Soplember 1966 



Aerospace Weapons Systems 

(Continued from Page 7) 

Matching ideas with Air Force 
needs is also accomplished by tech- 
nology reviews conducted for the Air 
Force by large aerospace industries. 
An improved understanding of Air 
Force needs has resulted from lec- 
tures and hardware displays during 
the program reviews. 

The widespread dissemination of 
Air Force requirements assists indus- 
try in evaluating laboratory efforts 
which may be applied to Air Force 
needs. However, real progress on 
translating today's laboratory ideas 
into tomorrow's weapon systems be- 
gins with the issuance of a Defense 
contract assuring funds for develop- 
ment of the innovation. 

The all-important aerospace Defense 
contract can be obtained by an Air 
Force request for proposal or by sub- 
mission of a voluntary proposal to 
the Air Force. An Air Force request 
for proposal is forwarded by procure- 
ment offices to qualified sources for 
accomplishment of a specific task or 
project. Direct Air Force solicitation 
is limited to industries with a known 
capability for accomplishing the de- 
sired research and development work. 
The industries interested in the work 
respond directly to the Air Force by 
bidding for a contract. 

Submission of a voluntary or un- 
solicited proposal directly to the re- 
sponsible Air Force laboratory might 
result in a contract if the proposal 
significantly advances the state of the 
art and provides potential solutions 
to Air Force technical needs. Annual 
contract awards for unsolicited pro- 
posals average more than $30 million. 
3 Any individual or business organiza- 
tion interested in marketing an idea 
is encouraged to obtain advance guid- 
ance directly from the appropriate 
RTD field unit for assistance in cou- 
pling the innovation to Air Force re- 
quirements prior to submission of the 
proposal, The division policy protects 
unsolicited proposals containing pro- 
prietary data if such proposals sub- 
mitted are clearly marked. 

Effective marketing of new ideas 
f 01-^ use in acquiring qualitatively su- 
perior weapon systems for the future 
p can only be accomplished by a co- 
hesive research and development 
aerospace team effort. An investment 
of industry ideas in Air Force tech- 
nology today will assure our nation's 
security for tomorrow. 



AFSC SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL LIAISON 
OFFICES (STLO's) 



Area STLO's 

AFSCSTLO (RTSAA) 
c/o The Boeing Co. 
Seattle, Wash. 98124 

AFSC STLO (RTSAN) 
111 East 16th St. 
New York, N.Y. 10003 

AFSC STLO (RTSAB) 
Waltham Federal Center 
424 Trapelo Road 
Waltham, Mass. 02153 

AFSC STLO (RTSAO) 

225 Jarvis St. 

Toronto, Ontario, Canada 

AFSC STLO (RTSAC) 
O'Haro International Airport 
P.O. Box 9626 
Chicago, 111. 60666 

AFSC STLO (RTSAS) 
International Science Center 
452 DeGuigne 
Sunnyvale, Calif. 94086 

AFSC STLO (RTSAD) 
500 S. Ervay St. 
Dallas, Tex. 75201 

AFSC STLO (RTSAW) 
c/o Department of the Navy 
Room 3543, Munitions Building 
Washington, D.C. 20360 

AFSC STLO (RTSAE) 
113 St. Glair Ave., N.E. 
Cleveland, Ohio 44114 

AFSC STLO (RTSUM) 
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 
68 Albany St. 
Cambridge, Mass. 02139 

AFSC STLO (RTSAL) 

AF Unit Post Office 

Los Angeles, Calif. 90045 

Host STLO's 
ARMY 

AFSC STLO (RTSRA) 

Aberdeen Proving Ground 

Building Number 314 

Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md. 21005 

AFSC STLO (RTSRF) 

U.S. Army Electronics R&D 

Laboratory 
Fort Monmouth, N.J. 07703 



AFSC STLO (RTSRE) 

Building 5101 

Edgewood Arsenal, Md. 21010 

AFSC STLO (RTSRZ) 

U.S. Army Tropic Test Center 

P.O. Drawer 942 

APO, New York 09827 

NAVY 

AFSC STLO (RTSND) 

U.S. Naval Air Development Center 

Johnsvillc, Wai-minster, Pa. 18974 

AFSC STLO (RTSNR) 
Naval Research Laboratory 
Washington, D.C. 20390 

AFSC STLO (RTSNM) 
Naval Missile Center 
Point Mugu, Calif, 93041 
AFSC STLO (RTSNT) 
Naval Ordnance Test Station 
China Lake, Calif. 93556 

NASA 

AFSC STLO (RTSSA) 

Ames Research Center (NASA) 

Moffett Field, Calif. 94035 

AFSC STLO (RTSSM) 

NASA Manned Spacecraft Center 

Houston, Tex. 77017 

AFSC STLO (RTSSL) 

Langley Research Center (NASA) 

Langley Air Force Base, Va. 23365 

AFSC STLO (RTSSW) 
Lewis Research Center (NASA) 
21000 Brookpark Road 
Cleveland, Ohio 44135 



R.I.P. 



(Continued from Page 25) 



AFSC STLO (RTSEP) 

Hq., Army Munitions Command 

Picatinny Arsenal 

Dover, N.J. 07801 



on this important problem to en- 
hance that never-ending search. But 
it is not enough that the Defense De- 
partment alone conducts such a 
search. Each major defense con-, 
tractor must examine his require- 
ments levied upon subcontractors, 
and each major subcontractor, in 
turn, upon his subcontractors. As 
productive results are obtained which 
can be emulated, or as problems are 
uncovered which can only be solved 
by DOD, information should be for- 
warded to the Defense -Department. 
Only in this way, by the efforts and 
cooperation of all concerned, can a 
Reduction In Paperwork be achieved. 




KorrtKii military imlcii nrc iinllwr 
i/cd liy (JmiKivw UK \\ mi'tmn of re- 
phu-iriK or [mpplcmi'iilinn' (inml Aid 
for tlin [iiirpojic of faHliluliii)',' tl l 
kindtt of urruiifvniii'iilji for individual 
nnil (lolli'i'livc jii'i-ui'lly required l<> 
promote world pi-Jim and Hi"' forrlnii 
policy, ni'dirily und jvciii'i'iil wi'lfjiri' 
of Hid ITiiiliitl Slid.'!!. Tin- t'xlml nf 
Uii'Ki! Ntih'H licnimi! iiimv fi-tudbli' mi 
llic I'c-iHinmir IIILI) Ilinmi'liil rnpiiliilltlcii 
nf tiur ullii'si improved liy Hir i-urly 
HKiO':!. In I he .'Wine linn 1 fii-riml, tin- 
id' pnyinniilM cDVctJ! id' il> 
U.K. fuvn i !i iihrniul wi-iv 
KOvm'Hy full, liy tliiii inillnn. 

1)1 I''Y HUH n vijv<>rmi:i prn^niin nf 
militnry (uilnn wt\ .-itiu'lcd jo trpbiir 
(Inint Aid lei Ilii' di'vi'luprd rnindrli';; 
and jiii:dnl: in imiintiitiihw i-minmm' 
ni|mliilil,y lo drpluy force:) iilmuid in 
ii fnnvnnl Hlnitt'Ky, 

IhiriiiK lli<> piuil four mid a Imlf 
yiiurit n total nf $10, Ii hillion hi urdn-rn 
uml comniidni'iilii hiui ln' 
IjUt'il. 1'lin iuduiiti'lnli/i'il 
Mnnt|)n nntl I he- l-'iir I'ljml inrnunt 
fiM- mon< (him nine liillinn [Enllnni nf 
LliiM toliil with Ilin niiitui' Indium' nf 
one and isni'-luilf liilllun dnllurji upivml 
tliroiiKlmul, rniiKc Ihiiti llll roiiiih'lt';i. 

Ajiiul fi'uin tin- tilV'ii't of uliuiil liS, 

JU'l'CCllL ill' till! I'nn'iMII I'Vl'llllllJ 1 ,!' ni;il:i 

ill' iiur rorccii di'pltiyi'd iiliroiiil (i*s- 
rlllnivi> of Vii'lliiiin), till' iiiilrsi pro- 
dui-liiK KV IDil'.MDdii f.'d tintrni 





,(. (Jnwnlry In Den. for 
In HK> Di'|>, Aunt. Hccro 
tnry nf Dcfwrnfi ([iiU>rnu(loiinl LtiKiK- 
IICH NcffotliitloiiK), Ofllcour ANHI. H-e- 
>;ofry of pcfciwc (IiUoriKUloiiiil 
HociirUjr AfTnli-H). lie nln., *ii|ic>rvlnoH 
(lio nclivilluH cif (lio Fwk'nil Kcmibllc 
of (jcrinimy, Kiiropcnii mul I.iitla 
American DlrcctornlcH. 



,1. liinvnli'.v nnil Lcniniiil A, Aim- 

ll iil) uliilivi. nviitinr. l.lim.rHin 
*'Mi'j; nf riii|i)>iyini'[il in il>,<M)D 
lii'iiri in miiiv Iliiiii I.VUU i-iiicri, 

Iml'-pi'iidi'iil ml' I In- :::di-j' pi i 'run n. 

(lie I'Vpi-llilillM'i-.'; I'm' i>l|1lipMK'll1 pi n 
I'tiri'd nlu'iiinl 3"V I'.)', J'nii'i'ii ihn hi| p . 

KV MM;:! liim. mid rtr:.i imir ..f i-'v 

Mllili Inhdi'd ;;'Vli| n,illl'>n (; ..... cliiul), 

'I'll!' I'llh' III' Mli'll rSpi'lulillllT'i I, 'i ill* 

i-lliiiiiK (SI Kl.:i tiillliini in I-*V in Hi. 

mid :?H'..!i Hilllioti dm iii{?. July ]i>vnt 



IM 



diii'llun:; n rr iiiiliUi-ly I'lvuU'. 
turn" ni" n]ilinii!d jiiitrin i'luml lu tin- 
United Mlnir.'i titiri imw It-ft iiEiu<i..l 
t'M'liMiV'i'ly lint; i<spi<ndihiir"> (i-.t:,, 
piililir nlililli--, Cut']!,, I'D. i, I iiinl liM-jd 
iTiiiiHiny x i M- nil! hi i I'd) wtiii'li MI n fit 

Cnhll | ill"' II 'i 1 I'll |! I'" I ; ,:' ; , fon'i-ii in ii I 
Ilirir di'pi'liili'iil'i ni'i' iil'imul, 

In I'.iinii-t'liuii \vi|ti ''idi-'i iu;i' i '' H 

Hlfllln, ll|i- F 1 I I linillllti'lH.'Jll V.i(ll 

tlin Unlli'il KiuHiluiii n.in'hiLlv'l April 
(., MMili. and iiiiii-inlr<l l-'rh, '/I, 

nilit'i, j;t |)|f nnly Iri'i'lil Md" iliVnlv 

fujf iiMivini'iil nit III.- pint of tli.- 

Ultitrd Mt ul CM, l.i pMi'.-lnp:.' id-1'..nd, 
llHl II Iri Illllll'ltliVr (if 111.- tU'n WilV 
,'illTt'l rlllirjli'l'-l' (Hint til'- isiilrn pi, i 
JU'IIHI 1 1 ill hi tlf pic pin I'd lii it ii', til 1 1'*. 
lii i'uiiti'iii|i|tilLnii uf nit nlirutfl pin 

ftiuiii- U' i:t, i- 1 i mid ]' tin ..f 

lilinllt Uvu lillllnii tiolliiiM, llrlfi'li iioi 
llnirilliM Ilivl |HM]H.,^I| (tiul Dtlll 
KltiinilUrc frrrnill irVrnni ll ( ii'li|v 
lilflll of lli'ffllHI' t'l|UJplllfIlt fl'HMl till' 
Ullil'-ll Kllldilniil. IllMt l.'jc.'l.-d thin 
propuKJil on lli<< KiHlindu (lint itUm-uf d 
lii'nrun-iuciiL liivldv. In^li )<it<M mul in- 
t-llli'lt'iil pninirrjni'iit. IKtlJ iU<l >''". 
IHIU'CV.T, In (ii'mvli i.ut ilnnti for \vltlrli 

H I'll lull jinuiTf;! p|il'ii|- rnnipi'lili'.i' 

and to InvUc tlrilluli liltlit f..i- hurli 

ilflllM 01) tllti lill^ill lif i'tHlid ni|H|H'U' 

linn (!.(., mi tllirfri'iilltilM) wild U,H, 
tMnirrcM. A lni'H'<l of ?!!;:;, uillliou wjw 

I'Hlidllbilll'il fnt' lilH'll )li'ut tUTIiU'lit, HVl'l' 

the li- -yi-Hj- in-i-iod KitiM UiVip. More 
lliiui ir.ll itii|HH him- tii'i-ii iil.-iilitii-il 
M pf.it-ntinl fhini Unllt'd KliiK<liiiii 
Hunm-M iimli'i- H'niiii nf rnni, qitnllly 
mid iltrlivitry n.mprtilinn with U.H, In- 



''"; I'"' wiimi.iK U.S. liid (Marim.ii, 
.''lilpyiinl in Wldi-iiiuiin); ami the 
llillf.li (.tlpniiii. .,f maiiliimnt miulrpj 

Wlr> '.!.H | hillM Ihul ( ,f Murilll'ltv, Hfliy. 

' ''Hccrniii'ii Hi'ji Hifijj. 

InW lid:. fiH' l\vn nn>||||.|. ( )|| 1K mmy 

M-M-hi n,r it i., ml .d' SUM m ||| ion g 

mir hitlf ndllin diilliu','1. lii nililidnn j 
Ho- I ',,'!. Ait 1 l''nivr pliiini | (l || H( , j, : 
Xi-r:iinM "I 111" 1 Kiilbi lluycn Sjil'V fin- 
fiinr in A ,' nirriid't, Tlii' rnniiH-iuvill 
IK- ttuill in lln- rnih-d Miidi'n hy Alii- 
Mm Mn i;. jt'ii .if Ci'ii, Tid Motuv.'i, iuiti- '' 



On Miiy i:i, IHIili, Srrrrlary f Do- 
I'Vii^,.- MrNiinnirii I'rdi-H'tl into n 
friiini-\vMk'K iit'.i.'i'iiii'iil with Wcsl 
C.-iiinin .Miidnli-i' nf |)id'rii:i<< vim lias- 0- 
;,'! I'm 1 ill,' |iuit-hiii:i< id' Ili;i|ntiifi",Simn f 
'i;'n '."I'IIIIM CUM-* iil'li'i' Iniviniv lircn ail- 
vh;.'d tiy I In- Si'i-n-iiiiy n|' UK. Aviiiy 
Uml iln' ]'.',',. 1,-MiiiK pi'Mjiriiin on the 
iMiii 11 1 id n i in i ni id I ion Iiinl limi niiii- 
!<t'|.'d v,jih nHfrinp'.fitl iTimllii. While 
wi- liiui' it'i K'niiidtini'iil tn |nirohaso 
fii'in (M'Tioiiiiy, tlic Army tents 

xll'i.'.Vrd i'ol|rlll;ilv>-ly Itlill, till 1 best 
V,V;O,IH|| nvudal'l" In Mii'i'l n t'l'itinil 
Aifnv r.'0,iiin-iii>-iit in lh<< iinninlinto 




Wi- idt'tiunt'tl llic iiiiijui' Um of nuti 
ctmihiiUint Htnnll imviil vcwu-ln UN unn 
Hint tlu- Unitttd KliiK'liint might ccr- 



,Mr, Lftiriiinl A. Alnc IH l)cn. 
Wi'Biiiui Sy[i'in rMiintiltiK. 
AWHI, Mi'rn-lHry f 
tiiitml I t (iiHllCM N' 
of AMI. Hrcri'lnpy of 
nnllunnl .Si-ciirlly AfTnlrH). He n' 
Hiiiml<' (hf ncllvUh'H f (lie 
, Ncnr Knl "tl I' 



September 196* 



time frame is the Hispano-Suiza 820 
ram gun. Therefore, in terms of 
available guns to meet our require- 
ments, it appeared reasonable and in 
the best interest of the United States 
that about $75 million for this gun 
procurement be authorized from Ger- 
many, a country that has been spend- 
ing annually some $600-$700 million 
for military materiel and services in 
the United States. 

The Defense Department accepts 
the need for a two-way street in inter- 
national defense transactions for the 
basic reason that we do not think that 
j we will be able to maintain our 
r high level of export sales unless 
we evidence our willingness to pro- 
cure abroad at least a portion of the 
value of such sales. We will avoid 
being maneuvered into any agreement 
which allocates procurement. We will 
stress competitive procurement. 

U. S. policy objectives in interna- 
tional armaments and defense logis- 
tics arrangements are based on and 
associated with other national objec- 
tives to : 

" Encourage controlled disarma- 
ment. 
* Avoid arms races, 

Tailor acquisitions of defense 
equipment to valid military require- 
ments, available manpower capabili- 
ties, and competing social claims 
against national resources. 

Within these constraints, the 
United States employs the whole 
lattery of cooperative research and 
development, coprocluction sales and 



competitive procurement from for- 
eign sources with the following aims: 

To encourage increased allied 
defense capability tempered by con- 
cern with the demands of economic 
development and political realities. 

To sell U.S.-produccd defense 
equipment to free-world, financially 
capable buyers tempered by a will- 
ingness to consider coproduction or 
licensed production abroad when sale 
seems precluded. 

8 To share U.S. technology with our 
allies so as to evolto their defense 
effort without incurring- duplicative 
costs tempered by the need to avoid 
a gratuitous weakening of the U.S. 
competitive position. 

To make first-lino equipment 
available to our allies tempered by a 
need to avoid uncompcnsntcd security 
risks of compromise. 

To be willing to procure selected 
defense equipment abroad for use by 
U.S. forces as part of largo scale for- 
eign purchase programs in the United 
States under competitive arrange- 
ments including- participation by the 
United States when this nation can 
be assured of quality, cost, delivery 
and support terms equal to those ob- 
tainable from U.S. industry. 

* To encourage the growth of an 
economically, politically and techno- 
logically strong North Atlantic Treaty 
Alliance tempered by continuing- at- 
tention to the effect of each action of 
logistics cooperation on other U.S. 
national objectives and on all sectors 
of the U.S. economy. 



MAJOR MILITARY EQUIPMENT 
U. S. DEFENSE EXPENDITURES ABROAD ENTERING 
THE INTERNATIONAL BALANCE OF PAYMENT 
FISCAL YEARS 1 962-1965 AND 
THE FIRST HALF OF FY 1966 

($ Millions) 


Region 


FY 
1962 


FY 
1963 


FY 
1964 


FY 
1965 


Total 
FYG2- 
GB 


First 
Half Grand 
FY Total 
1966 


EUROPE 


73,1 


73.1 


67.7 


62.9 


?fif 





22.4 


OQO Q 


NEAR EAST & SO. ASIA 


1.9 


1.0 




.4 


8.8 




g 


a 


PAR EAST 


64.8 


62.2 


26 


.2 


4,5 


ISfi 


.7 


2.0 


1887 


AFRICA 


.1 












1 






1 


WESTERN HEMISPHERE 


37.8 


67.9 


113.0 


75.6 


204 


.8 


20.3 


314 


7 


OTHER 


.2 





12 


.4 


.3 


12 


.9 


2.2 


15 


1 


GRAND TOTAL 


167.9 


194.2 


208 


7 


143.3 


714 


.1 


46.9 


7fll. 





As of 31 December 1966 



Redesign Doubles 

Capability of Navy's 

Sub Rescue Vehicle 

The U.S. Navy has redesigned its 
prototype submarine personnel rescue 
vehicle, known as the Deep Submer- 
gence Rescue Vehicle (DSEV), in- 
creasing the rescue capacity from 12 
to 24 people. 

Although the increase in rescue ca- 
pacity adds about 5,000 pounds to the 
weight of the vehicle, it still retains its 
speed potential and air transportabil- 
ity, iwo major advantages in the re- 
vised design are increased mission 
reliability by reducing equipment op- 
eration time, and increased crew sur- 
vival time aboard a distressed sub- 
marine from 24 to 48 hours. 

Increased crew life survival time 
aboard a distressed submarine is pos- 
sible because the greater rescue ca- 
pacity of the DSRV provides more 
space for greater amounts of oxygen 
and lithium hydroxide to be taken 
down and transferred to compart- 
ments within a stricken submarine. 

Construction of the DSRV proto- 
type will be completed and delivery 
made to the Navy in June 1968. The 
submersible will then become the first 
part of a "rescue mission system" to 
provide the Navy with a high prob- 
ability of an on-the-scene submarine 
rescue capability anywhere in the 
world within a 24-hour period. By 1970 
the Navy plans to have six DSRV's 
completed which will provide world- 
wide submarine rescue capability. 

Lockheed Missiles and Space Co.. 
Sunnyvale, Calif., is designing and will 
construct the prototype vehicles. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Army R&D Lab 

Evaluates Silent Power 

Turbine Unit 

"Silent power" of a 3-kilowatt tur- 
bine unit is being evaluated by the 
Army Engineer R&D Laboratories, 
Port Belvolr, Va. for possible use in 
forward areas. 

The experimental mercury Rankine 
cycle power unit inaudible at 100 
meters is one of three power sources 
with low-noise characteristics being 
studied by the Army. 

The Ranlune system consists of a 
burner, a mercury preheater and 
boiler, a mercury vapor turbine, air- 
cooled condenser, mercury-feed pump 
and controls. Production units would 
weigh less than 200 pounds. 

The turbine is designed for 24,000 
r.p.m. to drive a direct-connected al- 
ternator. The turbine-alternator-feed 
pump assembly is hermetically sealed 
with rotating components on a single 
shaft. 

The model will run on any liquid 
hydrocarbon fuel including gasoline, 
"CITE," and JP-4. 

29 



Brig. Gen. Charles H. Roadman, USAF 



On November 1, the Aerospace 
Medical Division (AMD) of the Air 
Force Systems Command will cele- 
brate its fifth anniversary, The most 
important single fact about the Aero- 
space Medical Division is the breadth 
of its mission. When the division was 
formed in 1961, it was given the three- 
fold responsibility for aerospace medi- 
cal research and development, medical 
education and clinical medicine. 

We perform research in support of 
aerospace systems development. We 
practice clinical medicine, primarily in 
support of aerospace operations, and 
we conduct teaching programs in the 
specialized techniques of aerospace 
medicine and its related disciplines. 
The philosophy behind this three-fold 
mission ia that each facet of the total 
effort supports the other two. It pro- 
vides a favorable climate for rapid 
advancement in medical knowledge 
with wide and prompt dissemination 
of new concepts into medical and op- 
erational practice. Medical research 
and development account for the larg- 
est part of our total effort. Roughly, 
70 percent of our budget, our physical 
facilities and the talents of our pro- 
fessional and technical people are 
spent on research and development 
programs. 

Clinical practice claims about 20 
percent and the balance of 10 percent 
goes into medical education. Of course, 
there is a good deal of interchange in 
personnel and equipment between the 
three missions. The research people 
also dp some teaching and they may 
participate in medical practice too, 
especially in connection with experi- 
mental programs. Clinical personnel 
also do research and teaching, and the 
teaching staff engage in medical prac- 
tice mid research, 

The proportion of our total effort 

assigned to any one facet of the mis- 
sion does not necessarily reflect the 
relative importance to the Air Force 
or to the nation. Our educational func- 
tion, for example, is the prime source 
of trained specialists in aerospaco 
medicine, not only for this country but 
for many of our allies. We have also 
trained most of the medical officials 
now with the airlines, in aerospace in- 
dustries and with other Government 
agencies, such as the Federal Aviation 
Agency and the National Aeronautics 
ami Space Administration (NASA). 

A^' om m its hea dquarters at Brooks 
AJ.<I3, t Tex., the Aerospace Medical 
Division commands, manages and 
plans for eight operating facilities at 
six geographical locations scattered as 
far away as Alaska and the Philip- 
pines, fcach of these units has its own 

30 



commander and their missions reflect 
the varied aspects of our AMD mis- 
sion. 

Wilford Hall USAF Hospital. 

Wilford Hall USAF Hospital, lo- 
cated at Lackland AFB, Tex., is the 
prime clinical arm of the division. This 
1000-bed facility serves as a base hos- 
pital for the Air Force's basic military 
training center, and receives compli- 
cated cases referred from all over tho 
world. The hospital also contributes! 
to our education mission by providing 
medical training in 18 specialty areas. 
It participates in our research and 
development program through its 
aerospace medical laboratory (clini- 
cal). 

Aerospace Medical Research Labora- 
tories. 

.The Aerospace Medical Research 
Laboratories at Wright-Patterson 
AFB, Ohio, conduct research in the 
fields of toxicology, biomechanies, hu- 
man engineering and life, support. 
Founded 32 years ago, primarily to 
design, fabricate and test new flying 
safety devices and systems for the 
protection of man in high speed air- 
craft, these laboratories now repre- 
sent a capability in equipment and 
personnel not duplicated anywhere in 
the free world. 




Brig. Gen. Charles II, Roadman, 
MC, USAP, is Commander of the 
Aerospace Medical Div., Brooks AFB, 
Tex, Gen. Roadman is a graduate of 
Northwestern University Medical 
School and a graduate of the Air 
Force School.of Aviation Medicine. He 
is a Fellow of the Aerospace Medical 
Association and a member of the 
American Medical Association, 



Acroniedical Research Laboratory. 

At Holloman AFT1, N.M., tlio divi- 
sion's Acroinedieal Research Labora- 
tory is the homo of the largest t ruined 
research animal colony in the world. 
Tn addition to its work in impact 
studios, the laboratory trains Rhosus 
monkeys and cihmipanzofls to perform 
various discrete tasks. I'liiHolino data 
is kept on the individual nuhnals and 
on tho species, thereby providing sri- 
entints with iv good subject fur us< m 
those experiments not feasible for tin* 
human volunteer. 

Arctic AoronuMlical Laboratory. 

.Studios of human rnspoiiHPH to Iho 
Avetie environment are carnal mil at 
AMD's Arctic Acromcriicnl Labora- 
tory, which is located at Fort Wuin- 
wright, Alaska. In addition to leMiiiff 
cold weather survival equipment, this 
laboratory has been iiiHtriinumtul in 
the design and development of mich 
survival equipment for aircrew mem- 
bers, 



USAF Kimlemiolotfical Laboratory. 

The division's F.pidemiologicul Lab- 
oratory, located at Lmikhand AKH, is 
responsible for the investigation of 
epidemics any place in the world tlial 
might poso a threat to Air I'Vcn per- 
sonnel. This organisation was EriLru- 
mental in preventing an epidemic of 
meningitis at Lackland AFIt enrly 
this year. Marly identification of tlw 
specific meningitis bacteria HKSWIIM! 
the medical stall' at Wilford Hull Ifos- 
pi till in treatment and enabled insti- 
tution of early preventive inoainii 1 ^ 
that halted tint epidemic. For the role 
it played in this, tho orKJumatimi re- 
ceived 11 citation from HriukHUirU'ra, 
U, vS. Air Force. 

Fifth Epldemiologlcal Flight. 

A recent acquisition of tho (livlwioii 
is tho Fifth Kpidemiological Flight 
located at Olurk Field, Philippines, Its 
mission includes tho study and invrsli- 
gntion oJ! infectious diseases in (ho 
Far East and Southeast Asian nretia, 

USAF School of Aerospace Medicine. 

Tho XJSAF School of Aerospnco 
Medicine is collocated with tho licud- 
quartern at Brooks AFB, Tho KcJi&oI 
got its atart in 1017 as tho Aviation 
Medicine Laboratory. Tho history ami 
progress of aerospace medicine can IDO 
traced by tho history and progress of 
the School of Aerospace Medicine, 

In 194i), several years before Sput- 
nik, the school organized the first de- 
partment of space medicine in Ihfi free 
world. Since that time tho school lias 
played a key role in research in space 

September 1966 



cabin atmospheres, radiation hazards, 
^disorientation and a variety of other 
problems encountered in aerospace op- 
erations. The school conducts 30 
courses in specialised training that 
vary in length from three days to 
three years. 

The School of Aerospace Medicine 
has conducted the medical evaluation 
of the Air Force's aerospace test 
pilots, as well as all the NASA astro- 
nauts, except the seven Mercury astro- 
nauts. In addition, the school conducts 
a referral service for aircrew members 
whose flight ^status is questioned be- 
cause of medical reasons. A thorough, 
detailed medical evaluation, which the 
school is capable of giving, has re- 
sulted in return to flying- status of air- 
crew members who might otherwise 
have been grounded. During the past 
six years this has resulted in a poten- 
tial savings to the taxpayer of over a 
quarter of a billion dollars in training- 
costs. 

In addition to specific achievements, 
the Aerospace Medical Division has 
made a concerted effort to support our 
forces in Southeast Asia (SKA). In 
addition to providing some of our best 
trained medical personnel to medical 
facilities in SEA, our research and 
development personnel have been re- 
sponsible for a number of items in 
direct support of SEA. 

To provide comfort to pilots flying 
in unventilated aircraft at low alti- 
tudes in tropical climates, our re- 
searchers adapted a rubberised vest 
circulating chilled water through tubes 
from an ice chest, using an electric 
pump. The vest weighs approximately 



three pounds and is worn under the 
flying suit. The weight of the entire 
unit lor two men is less than 50 
pounds, including 25 pounds of ice, and 
it occupies about one cubic foot of 
space. In a humid atmosphere at 
temperatures of 115 degrees Fahren- 
heit, it cools two men for a period of 
two hours. 

Back in 1963 the human engineering 
people in our laboratories at Wright- 
Patterson AFB started working on a 
theory of lateral sighting techniques 
lor _aircraft. A modified gunsight was 
devised from this lateral firing concept 
and was tested in a C-47 aircraft. This 
led to the development of "Puff the 
Magic Dragon." These same laborator- 
ies also developed a Two Light Land- 
ing ^approach system for unimproved 
airfields, which is being tested in Viet- 
nam at the present time. 

Other developments now being eval- 
uated include a litter rack system for 
air evacuation flights. This new de- 
velopment enables medical attendants 
to draw a litter from its normal flight 
position while a patient receives what- 
ever care is needed. The litter then 
slides back and is locked in its regular 
place. An improved model of this sys- 
tem 1ms been given static tests and 
is now being- flight-tested in the C-141. 

An outstanding example of systems- 
oriented work has been our research 
on habitable atmosphere for space 
cabins. These experiments have been 
performed both for NASA, validating 
the Gemini Apollo cabin environments, 
and Tor any Air Force extended space 
flight including the Manned Orbiting 
Laboratory. 




ARCTIC AEROMEDICALLAB, 
FORT WAINWRIGHT 



AEROSPACE MEDICAL RESEARCH LABS, 
WRIGHT-PATTERSON- 



ASS'T/BIOASTRONAUTICS AND 
AEROSPACE MEDICINE LOS ANGELES 

(SSD) 



AEROMEDICAL LAB.HOLLOMAN 



SthEPIDEHIOLOQICAL FLT, 
CLARK AIR BASE 

'HILIPPINES 

'ISLANDS 





10SPACE MEDICAL DIVISION 
WILFORO HALLUSAF HOSPITAL, LACKLAND 

-EPIDEMIOLOGICALLAB, LACKLAND 
PERSONNEL RESEARCH LAB, LACKLAND 

L-USAF SCHOOL OF AERO SPACE MEDICINE, 
BROOKS 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Recant studies indicate that no un- 
toward effects result from the use of 
an atmosphere composed of 70 percent 
oxygen and 30 percent helium at a 
pressure of five pounds per .square 
inch. Earlier experiments had shown 
that an atmosphere of 100 percent 
oxygen at the same pressure could be 
tolerated for a period of at least 30 
days. We are now able to offer the sys- 
tems designer a choice of several cabin 
environments that will not impair the 
ability of the crew to function, 

The possibility of damage to a 
spacecraft in flight has raised the 
question of emergency procedures 
after an explosive decompression. Our 
concern is not only with the time of 
useful consciousness, but more especi- 
ally with the time available to save 
the crewman's life and to prevent per- 
manent brain injury. 

( Chimpanzees, trained to perform 
discrete tasks, have been exposed to a 
near vacuum for as long as three and 
one-half minutes. After recom press ion, 
and a four-hour interval for recovery, 
they performed at a level consistent 
with then- capability before exposure. 
The exposure time of three and one- 
half minutes cannot be extrapolated 
directly to human beings. However, it 
(toes imply that full recovery is possi- 
ble after a longer exposure than had 
been suggested previously. 

In biomechaiiics, we study the ef- 
fects of transient accelerations, vibra- 
tions and impact. Test equipment now 
in use includes drop towers, various 
other motion simulators and the hori- 
zontal track. In the past year, we have 
evaluated the F-lll restraint harness, 
the shifting center of gravity during 
simulated ejection from the? Gemini B, 
and the vibration levels expected dur- 
ing flights of high-speed aircraft at 
very low altitudes. 

In the next few months, the now 
Dynamic Escape Simulator should be- 
come fully operational at Wright- 
Patterson. This is really a complex 
motion simulator, with which wo can 
generate acceleration forces together 
with vibration, changes in pressure 
and variations in temperature. We 
have examined., these stresses individ- 
ually for years. Now, for the first 
time, we can produce them in realistic 
combinations and sequences as they 
are actually experienced in flight. 

Prom the early days of aviation, 
components of the present Aerospace 
Medical Division have paralleled the 
extraordinary achievements of air- 
craft engineers in evolving high-speed, 
high-altitude flight systems by recon- 
ciling them with human needs and 
limitations. These advances have con- 
tributed significantly to the safety and 
comfort of passengers in modern jet 
transports. Since World War II the 
same progress has continued by exten- 
sion to rocket aircraft and space ve- 
hicles. Eventually these innovations 
will bo enjoyed routinely by travelers 
in supersonic transports, orbital glid- 
ers and inter-planetary spacecraft. 
The work that ia going oh within the 
Aerospace Medical Division today will 
play a key role in this development. 



31 



Sept. 22-JM: (iovernnienl-Indiintry 
I'rocnroinenl Clinic, Seattle, Wanli. 
Contact: Tom IIynen Jr., Depl. of 
Coinnu'rce & Kconomic Devi'lop- 
inenl , II 1 2 Fi rut A ve. N., Seal I le, 



Sept. !M-Orl. 2: (ircater 
Chamber of Common-!' Midweni 
Space Fair, Jackson, Mich. 

Sept. 2(i-2H: Marino SysleniH Confer- 

ence, 1,OH AlltfeleN, Calif. 

Si'|i(. 2(i-2H: Sixth Annual National 
Conference on Knvironmcnlal Kf- 
fects on Aircraft and 1'ropiilnion 
HynU'iMH, I'rinrelon, N..1. 

Sept. 27: ImluHlrinl I'roriliTmenl Con- 
ference, Oakland, Calif, 

Scpl. 27-110: American Hoenltfen Hay 
Society McoliiiK, Han Francism, 
Calif, 

Sept, 2H-20: National Security Imhin- 
trial AHHH. Marine (Jciideny Sym- 
posium, (loUnnliiiH, Ohio, 

Si'pt. ill): liuhiHlrial ('rocim-tncnl Con- 
ference, San Bernardino, Calif. 

Oct. 1-2: Akron-Canton Airport Avia- 
tion Dayn, AKron-Canton Airport, 
Ohio. 

Ocl. 2: WiiiHton-Salont Jayeee Air 
Fair, Smith Reynold* Airport, 
>ViiiHtnn-Salem, N.(!. 

Oct. 2-1-1: l''(uirlh Annual HcNearch 
and DuvolopiiK'nl. ManaKemiMil Pro- 
k r nun, Haitelle Memorial IiiHliluli' 
(Ohio) and Ohio UnivcrHily, Culum- 
hiiH, Ohio, 

Ocl. !t"fi: International Fleet ronlrs 
Conference and Kxhlbilion, Mc(!r- 
mlck IMnc, Cliica^o. Ill, 

Oct. !).fi; IiiHlitnto of Kk-rlrli'iil and 
I'llcrtrtinicH I'lnKinci'rN AoniHiiiict* 
nnd Kli'rironii'H Cnnvention, Wimli- 
iufjlon, !).('. 

Oct -I: IndiiHlrlnl Proenriimiint Con- 
fi'renct 1 , Tncmin, Ari/,, 

Ocl, -I: ImhiNfrlnl 1'niiMirtiim'nt (!on- 
foroncc, Mnrlotta, Ohio, 

Oct. ^1-0: American Oil Chewintfi Hnci- 
ely Mt'olhm, l'1iiln<!itl]>lilii, I'a. 

Oct. fi-7: Inlorntitiomil AHHII. of HU'c- 
trlcnl LonffiH! McelliiK, Scottsdiilc, 
Arix, 



Oct, 6: Nnlioiml Htnirlly 
AHHII. Annual Muvthm nnd Dinuor, 



Oct. 7: InihiHtriiil Procurement (Ion- 
feronco, Atlmquonjuc, N.M. 

Oct. 7: .Society of American Military 
KtiKlnccrH Mooting St. Paul, Minn, 

Oct. 0-1-1: Klcctrocliemicnl Society 
Meetlnn, Plillndolohln, I'd. 

Ocl, lfl.12; ANHII. of the U.S. Army 
Meeting, ShcrnUm-PRrk Unlei, 
WnHhlnRlon, D.C. 



Oct. 11-12: Air Tci'hni<|iii'n fur Air 

MIcctronicH M i'H hi!;, 

D.C. 
Oc(. 1 l-i;J: Armed l ( 'orci-H 

ini'iil AHHII. National Confcrcnn 1 , 

Sliiiri'hain lltilt'l, WaHhiniilon, D.C, 
Oct. 17-HI: American Society of Civil 

Knipni'crH IMceliiii;, I'hiladrlptila, 

I'll. 
Ocl. IH-lHI: Ami'i'inin Society of nli-- 

clinnical [''aiKiuecrn ftlcolinic, MtiUM 1 - 

aiiolin, Minn, 

Ocl. Ill-Hi; hi'ililiile iif I'llcclrinil anil 

Mlei'tninlcH MiiKincerH Mi'diiiK, Ho''- 

tim, MHHH. 
Ocl. ^il-Hli: Ninth Nin y/liuluMlry 

Conference on Miitcrinl Keliahilit.v, 

Wmiliinidon, D.C. 

Oct. 27-HS; Tulmi Chamber of Com- 
mcrce Air I'Yulivnl, itivcrtddc Air- 
purl, TiilMii, Oklu. 

Ocl. ;tI~No\. 2: Dcfeiuti- Supply AMMH. 
National Cunvenlinn, llenjainiii 
I'nuiKlin Hotel, I'hiladelphia, I'a. 



So 



Nv, H: huliiittrtal 

ciety MecliiiK, Chirnjio, 111. 

Nnv. l!-l: NnrflicuHl Klectnmic H - 
m-an-h ,V- I'liiKineerinfr RU'i-tinir, Itos- 
Ion, Masn. 

Nov. ;M: Air l''orc'/Nalional Hcnirity 
liidiislrml Ahfin. [\leol inj' |> a tr[ck 

U^ 1 1 r 'i f **" 

1 It, f 1 In. 

Nov. H-IO: .lolnl Comimter Confer- 
ence, Sun r'nuicineo, Calif, 

Nov. 11: National Sc'ciirily ImliiHtrinl 
AHHII, Merlin^, Naval Ordiiiince 
l.nboralory, Coroiin, Calif, 

Nov. M-|l>; American IVtroh-um In- 
nlilute M<'elinn, New York City, 

Nov. Ift-IV: ShipH Cunlriil SyHlems 
Sy in pot-it urn, AnitapotiH, Mil. 

Nov. 17: ItMlti'iliial I'roeiirement Con- 
ference, l.iniJHvillf, Ky. 

Nov. :!!i -Dec. '.',, American hiMtilnlo of 
Ai'i'iHiuiilii'H nittl AsdniuuilicM An- 
mini ^leelini; mid Technical l)iH|ilny, 



DOD Procurement Conferences 
Under Way; Seattle Scono of Fifth Session 



DOD will IH' juiiii'd In Ihe procure- 
Mii'iil I'linTei'i'iH'i')! hy wveral other 
Fi-iicnd iiK''iii'ii'!i, including tlie lie- 
I mi hi nn I of ( 'out n i< 'trr, (lie .Small 
Hiiiiimviii Ailiniiil;il.rnfion, ||it> Natiotinl 
Ai'i'iuinuUi':i nml Space Ailniinistni- 
lioli nnd Ihr <!i'tirnil .Hervieeii Admin- 
lull n I ion. In addllion, |,hi> Atomic 
Mntti'Ky Cnniiniii:i|on, Velerami Admin- 
liilnitinii, hi'iiiirfnii'iit. of Um Interior, 
Depni Itiit'iil nl 1 A (ft iriillnre and ollior 
iiifenrii'ji will piii'lieipatit in I'Oiifoi 1 - 
t'lii'i'H in which there in tin area of in- 
lereni, in (heir ni'tiviUeit, 

Tln> I'loi'iireiiit'iil. Conference I'vo- 
(nun in pui-t of UnD'n i-iitif iiiuinj[ of- 
fofl, In develop ndilitimitd compcLitivo 
1'onrcen, hu'Ke nnd mniill, to meet do- 
feinut rt'iiitiictnent!!. The find, confer- 

t'fii f (lii'i yoir'ti ;!erien was) hold ill 

I.ewinlon, Maine. (Hhei:i have been 
eoiivi'iinl ul Milu'iinkri', \S r in.; ({fldiPS- 
It'i 1 , *N.Y.; ami I'lirtliunl, Ore. 

Siih:iei|iii'iit t'unfi'n'iirt'H htivit licen 
fui' the fnllimluK imtca nn 



The lll'lh iu a scrii'H uf l-l 
I'l'iii'liri'iili'iil ( 'niilVri'iii'c I'nifi riiiii!>, 
ni'liftluli'H for I-'Y I'.HiV will In- hd.l in 
Senllli', Wiitilt,, Scpl. t!:Mi:i, ntiiliT III" 
H|mii!iin-;;hip nf Ilir Wanliiii);! mi !-!Uli- 
I Ii'piirhiU'Hl of ( liiniiiii'i'i'i', 

Tim coiilVreiii'i-ii are ili'fiii'.in'd In 
|inivide, in on<< locilllmi, u |ilu< n \'r 
Hie liu;iliH'!Kti)inii iiiid put i>n tial run- 
ti'iicf^r to hcciutti' iiei|iialiiti'd with tin 1 
I'^edcral liroi'lirenieiit. nnd cuiilrai'l 
(irnrrH!!; In have pnii'tical Imiividiiat 
di.'ii-iixnionii with liiu'ciiilinlii on hunt 
neuii opiiortiiniluiH in the Anny, Nnvy, 
Air l''ni'i'i' unit Di-JViisu' !-iti|ip|y 
Agency; and to ln< I'lnnim-li'd on tmr- 
plii'i imleii anil the ncUvitit-ii of tin' 
Itefi'iiai' (Nniiruct Admininti'atioii Ken-- 
ii'it, the Di'Triinf Uoi'iiiiienlution (Vn- 
tt't'i nnd tither Di-frtiiir ttrKnnlKMlinti:! 
eoiif-erni'd with iirinie coiitnu-tinK nml 



An item tif spceinl inlt-nvi!, ul 
Uin i'oiifitivnei'.'i will lie Hit' ?:tl) to 
$111 million in riiiTt'iit Invititlionn Km* 
HidH (IKH) nnd He) t netitn Kor Pn>. 
po.mibi (HK] p ), inclnditiK a number of 
".'imali iniivliano" (fca/mi) mid uniliT) 
]inckn(Ten which will lie on hiunl with 
Anny, Nnvy, Air Komi nml DMA 
<io unm.' loro. 

Iu addition, DOO prime cuiitnicdirM 
tin! area coiiliHiioun tu the nui- 
fttrencc Hitit will 1m on hand to tiim-umi 
opportunitieH. 



Hcjit. 117 Onklnnd, Citlif. 

Sept. :tl) Sun Henumtlnn, Cnlif. 

Allt'itUnvn, I'n. 
(let, ij 'i'ni'tion, Ari'/.. 

Miirirftu, Ohio 
OH. fi-rt- Annapolin, SallHhury fl 

Klkhtn, Md. 

(let. 7 AlhumuMXHie, N.M. 
Nov. 17- IfdtifKvlUt!. Ky. 



32 



September 1966 



Reliability Requirements 

a- (Continued from Page 19) 

The aerospace industry working on 
Government negotiated contracts does 
not have precisely the same com- 
petitive environment. However, we 
have seen Government contracts pro- 
vide bonus and penalty incentives to 
stimulate improved reliability. These 
dollar incentives are first felt by the 
stockholder and top level management 
of a company. The challenge and the 
opportunity is to find ways of extend- 
ing- these incentives to the designer, 
the engineer, and the worker who must 
build the quality into the hardware. 
The aerospace industry gave birth 
to formalized programs designed to 
develop individual pride in workman- 
ship. This concept has been adopted, 
fostered and encouraged by DOD. 
Most aerospace contractors today 
hiive instituted a formal Zero Defects 
Program, Evidence of substantial 
achievement has been recognized by 
the Air Force with its Zero Defects 
Achievement Award. 

Once embarked on such a program, 
many contractors have applied imag- 
ination and resourcefulness to develop 
techniques of their own which will 
assist the worker to identify himself 
with the quality of his product and, 
thereby, achieve recognition for ex- 
cellence of craftsmanship. 

Value engineering is a concept 
which in its earliest application 
seemed to emphasize after-the-fact 
review of engineering design. After 
this concept takes root in aerospace 
companies, it must graduate to the 
stage where it is an essential element 
of the initial design process. The im- 
pact of automated data processing, 
computing, storage and retrieval has 
only begun to relieve designers and 
engineers of the mundane and time- 
consuming tasks, leaving their minds 
free for creative thought. The intro- 
duction of graphic display to computer 
storage and processing capability 
should soon enable a designer to prove 
on his drawing board what once took 
years of construction and test. 

In our pursuit of 100 percent reli- 
ability, we must not overlook improve- 
ment of the tools which we now have, 
The need for hardware inspection will 
always be with us. Where it is less 
than perfect, redundancy will be 
necessary. We must, however, improve 
procedures, techniques, documentation 
and equipment. There is an endless 
need for non- destructive testing equip- 



ment not yet invented. Education and 
training of quality engineers and 
technicians must be revitalized and 
periodically updated. Industry, Gov- 
ernment and professional organiza- 
tions must work together in molding 
and developing these advances 
through the exchange of ideas, ex- 
periences and theories. 

In the previous paragraphs, I have 
talked of some evolutionary improve- 
ments which must be made in the tools 
that we now use. I talked earlier of 
some new concepts which must be ex- 
panded and applied in new ways. 

To achieve the consistent reliability 
needed to meet the very demanding 
requirements of future space ventures 
will not require a major break- 
through in the state of the art. If 
management in the aerospace industry 
can apply to these challenges the 
imagination and resourcefulness 
which have marked their past scien- 
tific and technical pioneering, there 
can be no doubt that the successes of 
Mercury and Gemini will be only the 
initial stepping stones in the explora- 
tion of our universe. Perhaps equally 
important will be the demonstration 
that our economy can afford to lead 
the world in space exploration with- 
out sacrifice of major objectives that 
are sorely needed to advance the 
standards of living here on earth. 



Famed Radar Scientist 

Joins Army Electronics 

Command 

Dr. Andrew Longacre, professor of 
engineering sciences at Syracuse Uni- 
versity and a nationally famed radar 
scientist and inventor, has begun a 
tour as a visiting 1 professor with the 
U.S. Army Electronics Command 
(ECOM), Fort Monmputh, N.J. 

Dr. Longacre, longtime member and 
former chairman of the command's 
Electronic Advisory Group, is on sab- 
batical leave from Syracuse, 

Long associated with radar re- 
search, and particularly noted for his 
work in side-looking radar, Dr. Long- 
acre will devote his work at Fort 
Monmouth to radar and its applica- 
tion phases. He will be associated with 
Dr. Robert S. Wiseman, director of 
the CS-NV-TA Laboratories, and 
Victor L. Friedrich, deputy director 
and also a veteran radar researcher. 

Dr. Longacre also will continue his 
duties as a member of the Electronics 
Advisory Group, comprising: top-level 
electronic scientists, engineers and ex- 
ecutives who provide advice and as- 
sistance to the commanding general 
of ECOM in the fulfillment of the 
command's missions. 



Systems Analysis 

(Continued from Page 34-) 
us, and an orderly, step-by-stcp im- 
provement along: these lines. I would 
expect that the best area for initial 
attention would be those new systems 
in which we do not have to press the 
technological state of the art too far, 
and whose eventual use is well under- 
stood and subject to quantitative 
analysis. But even in these cases, it 
might be wise, for a while, to retain 
certain of the classic parameters In 
the contract language as a hedge 
against the uncertainty surrounding 
the new technique. 

I believe this is the direction in 
which we should move. Since both 
Government and industry are inti- 
mately involved, it is something: we 
must work out tog-ether, and doing 
so requires an understanding of sys- 
tems analysis techniques by both put- 
ties.. Although the problems may be 
complex, the objective is simple;: wo 
would like to give you a hotter oppor- 
tunity to exercise your talent and 
ingenuity in designing:, developing and 
producing weapons that will hotter 
satisfy our real needs, ratlior than 
our arbitrary specification!-!. 

We feel confident that wo have a 
powerful tool in systems analysis, and 
that it is reducing some of the in- 
evitable uncertainty surrounding im- 
portant decisions. However, \VG in thn 
Office of the Secretary of Defense! 
cannot assure single-handedly that 
the full benefits of quantitative analy- 
ysis will be realised in our national 
defense program. To do that requires 
the assistance of all concerned, and 
I trust that this brief account of our 
views will help to enlist industry's 
support. 



European Command 
Headquarters Will 
Move to Germany 

The Defense Department has an- 
nounced that Headquarters, U.S. 
European Command, now located at 
Gamp dcs Loges, France, will bo trans- 
ferred to Stuttgart, Germany. 

The new location was chosnn with 
the agreement of the Federal Republic 
of Germany and after the other North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization nations 
were informed. 

Relocation of European Command 
headquarters is the second major step 
in DOD's program to rearrange and 
streamline the U.S. military command 
structure in Europe as a result of the 
necessity to relocate U.S. military 
forces from France. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



33 




rVinlrflct.i of $1,01)0,001) and over awarded 
(turiiifr the month nf August 1966; 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

2 Sinclair KefiniiiB Co.. Now York City, 
N'.Y. SUJ-vido. 12,6ii(),'JiiO trillions of Jl'- 
4 jtt fuel. Defense I-'uol Supply Center, 
AlfXiitiilriii. Vn. 

K Fortnatroft Eijiii|)ineiit Co., Pulaski, Vn. 

il.Nt'i.dSl. Si'li.'iiii.i toattd nylon twill 

|t:uich<^. r'ul;i.<ki. Deftnsc Personnel Sup- 

I'oft (.Viiler. Philadeliihia, Pa. 

5Hiegcl Textile Corn., New York City, 

N.Y. $'j,:i;>,v.0it. Is.SiJU.OwO square yds of 

rotUm sateen cloth. Defense Personnel 

nuWKirt Cntti-, Philadelphia, Fa. 

J. V. Stevens & Co., New York City. 

N.I. 32,0^4,756. 4,u21,2ou sQiiui-e yds of 

cotton sateen cloth. Defense Personnel 

Support Center, 1'hihuieliihiit, Pa. 

ii Ann's Textile Corp., Lowell, Masa, 

51,132.600. 1SO.OOO wool blankets. Defense 

lersnnntl Su])[jort Center. Philadelphia, 

~M V P< ,? t - cna & Co -' New York City. 
N.Y. Sl,Lis2,aG6. 200,100 wool blankets. 

Til ir- V-''" 01 " 11 ' 1 Support Center. Phil- 

1 : ' e ;, ! a "'! ,^'"". Cleveland. Tc-nn. 
M.fiU. i>i>&. 2 U( ,,ooo wool blankcta. Defense 
t^rsonncl Sui>i,oit Center, Philadelphia, 

V?Y-/i (>** & < "' 1 ' Sln(iiaon -i Wis. 
-..t<i-i..,iiJ. u.b-H.tuu 5',j-(iunce tans uf 

Sii i )on CU r - Utfc-nse Personnel 

~J!M' f*' 1 ( -' or "-' New York' City, NY, 
51.o37.0uo. 90.1.01)0 barrels of Grade FS 

~ 1 tini'M.-.,. f..*l -fi n f I - L . 



17 Stale 



, ' i 

..-.\an<in;i, Va. 
"^,' Loi 

- )( generul 



, Calif. 

se ienta - 

Support 

* vt, ' n - n - 

a --Valley Metallurgical Processing Co., E 3 - 

x. Conn. SU66.EOO. 5,01)0,000 pounds o 

sSrar^ >****; ' 'ral 
niiMJiy tenter, Itichmond. Va 

Aluminum Company of America, prtts- 
bWBh. Pa. $1.320.000. 4.000.0CO nwmb of 



19- 



-,-. Ul '*" Ldi, ot, Ijouia Mri ^^ 070 o<n 
i^9,Gt)0 L'nllnns r,F l,._k;_:.._ ~ "^'o." 4 ' 



Co " 



8 ' Eflst 



. N.V. 



Srv?~' SpBrE^iK 




CONTRACT LEGEND 

lowlnj; se;iuonce l - llt rHiJ!n IiSlecl '" thc fo1 ' 
Material or ' u ijoninany Value 

Lotion Worh "perfo^^Srotfc 



DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



licmia Co., Minneapolis, Minn. $1,225,314. 
2,000 packs of burlap sandbags .and <!K,97G 
packs of osnaburg sandbags. Defense Gen- 
eral Supply Center, Richmond, Vn. 

Consolibaff, Inc.. Philadelphia, PH. ?!,- 
018.05U. .10,000 packs of bin-lap Handbags 
and 13,000 pucka of osnabiirg sandbags. 
Defense General Supply Center, Richmond, 
Va, 

Peoples Co., Huntington, W.Va. $1,008,- 
450. 10,200 small general purpose touts 
ami 4. GOO vestibule type, general iiurnosc 
tents, HuntinBton. Defense Personnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia, Pa, 
30 West Polnt-Peimcrcl, New York City, 
N.Y. S3.13G.057. 2,417,000 yards of cotton 
(luck cloth. New York City. Defense Per- 
sonnel Support Center. Philadelphia, Pa, 

ARMY 

1 General Motors, Ypsilanti, Mich. $11.646,- 
810. 20mm automatic suns to be used in 
aircraft. Ypsilanti. Army Weapons Com- 
mand, Rock Island, 111. 

n^r! 1 "! 8 Rnd ' Co>1 AlldiH <>n. Tex. $1,000,- 
uou. Insulation provisioninK kits for UII-1 
helicoptei's. Atldlson. Navy Aviation Ma- 
teriel Command, St. Louia, Mo 
M rl H " l ' c nn neiiearch Col 'l>., Alexandi-in, Va. 
*i,^57^00. XM 2 canisters and XM 1 
explosive opener assemblies for 3CM<17 
mines. Alexandria and Gainesville, Vfl. 
J iciitnmy Arsenal, Dover, N.J 
IMason & Hanger Silas Mason Co., Lex- 
ington. Ky, (8.479.686. LoadlnE, nssem- 
Wnjf and packing GOO lb. bombs. Grand 
isinncl, Neb. Ammunition Procurement & 
supply Agency, Joliet, III, 

ft L HS 9 /t 



B 

^ 



num in 
Te lt " 



fll!d 



,', '" c " P 

ln B. nesc 

mcdillm 



A K 6n C yjo 1 leIll. 
Atlantic Research Corp., West nnovni- 

f. r w S2 s 200 - ? 27 "". "" 

nit, of XM2 canisters. West Hanover 

PicaUnny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. "' U1ovel ' 

New Orleans Stevedoring Co., Wew Or- 

" " ? 16 - 2 - 2 88. Steve lo nd 



' * P'-- 

tcl 'n Area, Military 

flnd TwialBaI S 



Consolidated Eneineprlmr r n n i,, 

Md. S3 728 ann Jv V * .V ' Bnl tlmoro, 

nn P el- ntion mainle- 




12 



1G 



Ch\- 
1'hi!- 



1G 



17 



10 



32- 



York City, N.Y; ' 



34 



BruiiBwick Corp., Marion, Vn. $3.603. 81*- 
Cnrtridjje launchers. SHKIII- (Ji>ivc, V. 
Edgewooil Arsenal, Mil, 

-Thomas CoJislim'liim Co., St. Jtisoifli. ?!"- 
S2.lfiJ.COO. Erection f Di-c-fnlirtaitoil l-ulfi- 
iiigB at l-'oi-L Luonunl Wndil, MH. )-!iij,'inf 
Dint., KtuiHiiH City, Mo. 

-Gould National HattciicB, SI, I'linL. Minn. 
$1,221,320, J2-voll HtiiriLB bultcrli-s tir 
euneral nso. Monroe, Mli-h, Amny 1'ark 
Automotive Center, Wiirreii, Mli-h. 

-Admiral (,'nrp., Cliluiitci, III. 5l,iuH f s:i- 

Viiriotis qniinlltios nf f^rjinii nit ftr 

radio receiving Kcltt (ANMIKN.'ilK 
CIIBO. Army Elcoti-onlcH Ciunniarul. 
adelnhin, 1'n. 
BoUiIelicm Steel Corp,, IJelhli-lium Pa- 
3,500,000. (inn tube fork'inifa for "^ 
176mm KUH. Uethlehom. WnecrvJItt AJJC- 
mil, N.Y. 

Mid vale Hci>iieiisln3l Co., PlillniU'lplttn. J 1 *. 
$2,0r>0,000. Tube forutiiBH for the 17'n-n 

Biin. I'lillnclclnhla, Wiitcrvllct Ai'M-nirl. 

Kaylhcon Co,, Jleclfortl, Miihs. S2,r,(ju /:,''. 
Contract definition plittac for 1liu SAHi-I* 
mirfnce-lo-nlr miHJiilo Hyslfin. Hfitfi^J, 
Maun., anil Orlamlo, Fiji, Army Ml "* 
Command, HunlsvlH, Alu. 

Hughes Aircraft, I-'ullortoti, Cnllf., |3,fr2<,- 
582. SAM-D mlHsilo system. KiilKjlun, 
Santa Monica nml Sun Jc.sc, <Jnli(. Artr.j 
MiHfllle Comnmnd, HiuitHVille, Aln, 

RCA, Mooreatown, N,J. $8,07-1,01)5. Con- 
tract definition iihiimj for tlw SAM.]) nil?- 
ailc syHtem. MoorcHtown, N.J. itiui Wfc'>-- 
Ha, Kan. Army Millie CDIIUIULIUI, llunis- 
villu, Aln. 

General Motors, Dclco Ittemy 1)1 1-., Ainkr- 
son, Ind. Sa,HH,42(l. 12-vnlt dt^ruKu tot- 
terk'H. Anaheim. Calif, nnd Huiv Uiunt- 
wlek, N.J. Army Tank Autnitvillvi- Cvrttcr. 
Warren, Mich. 

-Fifth West, Inc., Scuttle, Wiisli. 3H'(*.- 
fiOO. Woi-lt on the I.lbby Iliiui J'mjcft. 
Near Libby, Mont. MtiBlnni-r Dlhl,. !Jt.il- 
llo, Wash. 

~ V 9 C[)|1 I ) -. Stratford, Conn. $l,lf^i,riC?. 
lurbine rotor blades for T-Cij uiitiiiic.i. fa 
* , P 11 " 1 <-'He<l>ter. Strrilfdr.l, Atiuj 
Avintlon Materiel Uomniiiiul, St. \.u\', 
Mo. 

"nn!?" 1 " 1 Cl ' cniit ' l Corn., UriHtoJ, 1'n. tit.- 
000,281. LomUn^r lissortibJiriLi r\i\t] ij^fhlne 
of miHocllancotiH (llumlniUliiH nht'lf* nnA 
Blfftmls. MnrslialJ, Vox. Amniniill3.ni 1'nv 
ciiromonl & Snnuly Afton^y, Jnlk-1, Jll 
-Chain Itcrlnhi Corit., Wnterlcio, Imvn, (1,- 
COS,170. Mctnl iMirts for th^ S.It. |IK!I 
rochet. Willorloo, AmniiinlLiiiii JV.Kijrc- 
men I & Supuly ABonny, Joltot, IIL 
lj. 1. Industries, Garland, Tex. JI.WH.Sl-J. 
Pin flHHembliea for TBO-ixunid liDinhn. (Jnr- 
Jniid. Ammunition Procurement & Wuiii.Jjr 
Aeoncy, Jollot, III. 

-rtnythcon Co., Lcxlneton, MCIBH, (I.OJfi,- 
I>p0. Metal parti for noriul Iximbu, ItrJstol, 
lenn, AmmunHlon Pi-oourvineiiL A Hui'pV 
Affcney, Joliet. 111. 

"Po^ 110 ^ 1 Mo ^ 1-H ' Detroit, Mlcli. SSI, MS.. 
1M8. KoncLlvatlon ncttvIticB ami iir^lin-lfun. 
of 105mm projeetilca nt tlie Hi. IAM\*. 
Mo,, Army Ammunition Plnrit. Amrawnt- 
T i! 1 ''omiremonl & SuinJy ARWtf. 
Joliet, 111, 

51,OOfi,5G2. Adniitcr boostorn for' ticidai 
Jiombs. Fltchbui-B. Ammunition 1'rwucc- 
ment & Supuly Apuncy, Jollet, III. 

"?on r n " " !ao " Co " Kolao, JilnliQ. !3 f - 
GoO.081. Work on tho Law or Moiiuiiictiln] 
Unm, .Snake Rivor Project. Nojir I'ftsro, 
n ?i j" 1 - Engineer Dlst., Seattle, Waalt. 

-cii Jiclico|)lcr Co., Fort Worlli Ti. 1 *. 
$1.124,408. Rotor rudder blndea tor UH-1 
holicopterfl. Fort Worlli. Army ArinUon 
Materiel Gommnnd, St. Louia, Ho. 

-Amvon Corn., Wnuhosha, Win. $G,<J05.S53. 

w mm . bl '"BB carti'ltlge cusc-a. Wnnkc^^. 

^rnnhfoi-d Ai-Bcnnl, PhJlncleliJitn. Pit, 

J 1 , ^ "? , Tiro & Buhbcr Cm, Akvon, OIilo, 
i i i Shoo aBHornbltea for comlnl 

vomoiea. Muncle, Ind, Ai-my Tnilk Auto- 

M^V-' ' Co ?, t011 ' Wni-ren, Midi. 

ifii .T? P Corp., Anaheim, Calif. (fi'.NM.- 

iob. auwk misallo Immolwra. Analielrn. 



Army Missile Commiiiul, Hiintaville, Ala. 

^& Wilkenaon Mfg. Cu., Fort Cnlhoun. Neb. 

*^ SI, 127, 237. 60mm cartridge fin assemblies. 

Fort Calhwin. Ammunition Procurement 

& Supply Agency, Joliet, III. 

Eureka Williams Cu., Uloomintfion, 111. 

S7,1B3,67S. 6110- and 750-poumi bomb com- 

ponents. BloomiiiKton. Ammunition Pro- 

curement & Supply Agency, Joliet, III. 

Control Data Corp., lictlicsdn, Md. $4,3.15,- 

75S. Developinn, dostenins, fabrienlinjj 

nd testing of equipment necessary to 

provide Jin experimental automated Tac- 

tical OperiitioiiH System. Palo Alto, Cnlif., 

MinriunpoliH, Minn, and in Germany, 

Army Electronics Command, Philadelphia, 

PII. 

-Berffeii En&lncerinir Co., East Huthui-ford, 
N.J. SI. 148,408. Coiifltruction of an am- 
munition development and engineer inn; 
facility lit Picntinny Arnenul, Dover, N.J. 
Engineer Dlst., New York City, N.Y. 
29 Rcminitton Arms Co., Bridgeport, Conn. 
826894,311,1. Landing. usctemblinff and 
pnckjnir of miscellaneous small arms nm- 
munttion find components. Lake City 
Army Ammunition Plant, Independence, 
Mo. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Afrcncy, Juliet, 111. 

Martin Marietta, Orlando, Fin. $2,023,0(1!!. 
Ciinistei-s, Orlnnilo. Picntinny Arsenal, 
Dover, N.J. 

-Pliilco Corp., Newjiort Bench, Calif. $2,- 
3_10,000, Comiilction of development uf 
\M3iJ In; II top tcr armnmont Hub-syHtem. 
Newport Honch. SprinKfield Armory. 
Mil as. 

3H-Hnnrcy Aluininiim, Inc., Torrance, Cnlif. 
$1, HBO ,000. Dotonntinti fuzes, Torranec. 
Fmnkford Arsenal, Philadelphia, pa. 

L. D. Products of Wells Marine, Inc.. El 
Sctfimdo, Calif. 81,10.1,040. Demounting 
(ll z .1 fll . , E1 SuKimdo. Frnnkford Arsenal, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

""PoTn!, Powder 9- Wilmuicton, Del. 
S13.D22.9nfi. Loading, aascmblinK nml 
line kins of miHcellnneous ni-opellanls and 
explosives ; nnd for operation unit main- 
tenance wfli-k. Radford Army Ammunition 
Plnnt, Rndfm-d, Va. Ammunition Procure- 
ment & Simply Anoncy. Joliet. 111. 
"H,, ". Cftrbidc Co ''l>., New York City. 
N.Y. $1.100. l-lfi, Dry batteries for a port- 
able radio receiver. Greenville, N.C. Army 
Electronics Command, Philadelphia, Pa, 

(]iill!er Construction C., Jjos Angeles 
Cnlif. $1.349.300. Construction of a one- 
B-tory brick and stucco buildiiiR nt Norton 
AIR. Cnlif. Engineer Dint., Los Ansolcs, 
Cnlif < 

Sonlliwlde Construction Co., Augusta, Ga. 
Jl.OlQ.SGO. ConBtniction of i-nnjrea at the 
Army Trninlnu Center, Fort Druse. N.C. 
iMiBinoer Dint,, Snvnnmih, GH. 

Lawless nml Alford. Inc., Austin, Tex. 
$4,466,013. Expansion of the Officer Can- 
didate Seliool at Fort Sill, Okln. Engineer 
Dlst., Aibnciiiei-diio, N.M, 

Brrmitc Powder Co., San^im, Cnlif. $2,- 
403,120, Fuze nasembllea for 20mm car- 
tridges. Saueus. Frankforil Arsenal, Phil- 
aiEeljihiiL, J?u. 

1'nl re III lil Camera nnd Instrument Carp., 
ParamuH, N.J. 7,800,000. Counlermensuro 
sots and iniscellnneoim itemH, Pnraimis. 
Army EliwU-onics Command, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

JInrvcy Aluminum Co., Torranee, Cnlif. 
81,738,000. 20mm projectiles. Torrance. 
Frankford Arscnnl, Philadeliihiii, P u . 

I rosroHsive Construction Co., Favmvillc, 
Va, ?1, 979,901, ConHtruotlon of two uuild- 
ItiEa and rehabilitation of 42 buildings at 
the Army Truinlni; Center, Fort Brnuit, 
N.C. Engineer Dint., Savannah, Ga. 

NAVY 

1 Pacific Shin Repair, Inc., San Francisco. 
Calif, $1,278,000. Overhaul of the landing 
fillip dock USS OAK HILL. Sun Pran- 
ciJico, Industrial Manager, 12th Naval 
District. 

Irn S. Buahcy & Sons, Brooklyn, N.Y. 
S1,047,3G5. KeBulav overhaul of the aiixil- 

nry floiitlns drydock (AUD-5), Brooklyn. 
InrtUHtrial ftlnnnger, 3rd Navnl District. 

Stanwick Corp., Washington, D.C. $1,- 
550,<IOI). Development nnd evaluation of 
nreventiwe maintenance standards for tho 
NavyB Mnintonance nnd Matei-ial Mnnasc- 
ment System. $1,512,544. Development of 
techniques and systems design to pormit 
analyaia of relliibility, mnintnlnabllity and 
management data for the Navy's Main- 
tenance nnd Mnterinl Management System. 



Wnshinglon, D.C. Naval Ship SyHteniH 
Command. 

2 Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Sunny- 
vale, Cnlif. 4.000,000. Research nnd de- 
velopment on the Poliii-ia missile re-entry 
Hyjitorn. Sunnyvale. Special Projects Office. 
United Aircraft, I'mtt & Whitney A5r- 
!'"". . Dlv " EnsL Hartford, Conn. $92,808,- 
flt)0. IF30-f'-8 engn*G3 for the Air Force, 
hast Hiiftford. Ntival Air Systems Com- 
mand. 

General Electric, Solicnectiicly, N.Yv $16,- 
S05,HUU. Hcsetirch nnd develoiment work 
m the field of njivnl uiinlenr propulslon- 
Schenectady. Nnvnl Skip SystuniB Com- 
m nnd. 

3 Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Hnnny- 
ViiLt. Cnlif, S21,GOO,000. PolrtriH A-3 mis- 
siles. Sunnyviilo. Speci.il Projects Ollice. 
--Haythcon Co.. Subinnrinca Signal I)iv., 
Portsmouth, H.I. SL, 769.771). Providing in- 
st met ion, mtitorinl, Herviccs Jind lestinn of 
sonar cquiDment. Port sin outh. Niivnl Ship 
System* Command, 

<icncrnl Electric, Schunectiuly, N.V. SIO.- 
900, 560, Furiiishinpr of Nnvy niiclcai- uro- 
]>iJl3ion components. Sehoiiuctndy. Niival 
Ship SyHtems Command. 

I North Amcricnn Avintion, Aulonctlcs 
iv., Anjihuim, Calif. $1,OGH,H22. Shins 
Inertliil Miivigalion Sy steins ccinipment. 
Aiiahuim. Navjil Ship Systems Commnnil, 
United Aircraft, Sikornlty Aircraft Div.. 
Stratford, Conn. Si,OHl,9iM. Sunre jwivts 
for SH-3D nircrttft. Stnitforcl. Nnvy Avin- 
tioti Suuply Ollice, Philndelpliiti, Pa. 
G-- I'.DO Corp., Lonsr Island, N,Y. S12,47ifi- 
751, Sonnr eiiuJpmeiit, College Point, L.I., 
N.Y. Naval Shi[> ByHteinn Commaiui, 
United Aircraft, Pratt & Wliilncy Div., 
Last Hurt ford, Conn. $8.600,0 GO. In- 
cccHHod funding for Plinsc II ,ii>vi-lon- 
mciit of the TF-80-P-12 cntjine. Eusl 
HJirtfon] Navnl Air SystoniH Commnnd. 
Sntiilcrs AssoeialcH, Inc., Nnshuii, N.1I, 
Sl.fMO.aoT. Continued basic cnpintjcrinK 
and development of nn air driippiibli; ASW 
sonolmoy uyalom. Nnnhiui. Nnval Ail- Sys- 
tems Command. 

Mnfrnnvox Co., Fort Wtiync. Iml. $l,40.- 
907. Continued lineiiu cuifinL-urinif and do- 
vcliipmcnt of nn nir droppnble ASW HOIIO- 
buoy system. Fort Wnync. Niwnl Air Sy- 
U-rna Command. 

M. G. Allen & Associates, Warwick. M.I. 
J1,Q!)0,QOO. Con Ht ruction of a 600-foot 
antenna nt the Naval Radio Stiilwm. New- 
port, R.I. nnd lit tho Navnl Radio Sta- 
tion, larlnc. Phili][iini! IH]IIIM|B. Norlli- 
eiiBt Div., Niival Fiieilltles KiiKinoerinB 
Cum mn nil, 

--Raytheon Co., Oxiiiti-tl. Calif. St,2G2.6()l>. 
Sei-vicos to fnbrlcnlo nnd deliver liirntuble 
triuiHmitterii for UIG live tonlro] Bywtcm 
for the Sen Sparrow Project, llndford, 
MJISH. n.nd Krlutiil, Tenn. Nnvy Purehns- 
IiiK Olllco, LOB Antrolea. 

~ United Alrcrnft, aiiiursky Div., St. nit ford, 
Conn. $9, 117, MO. CH-68A hclicauteTH. 
btnitfoj-d. Niivnl Air Systems Commjind. 
S -Wustinulioiiac Eleclric, Piitsbui-Kh, PII. 
$2D 1 7fi<l J lJH. Nuvy niicleur propulaiun com- 
poiicnta. Plttsburali. Knvnl Ship Syatcma 
Own ma nd. 

-American aljg. Co. of Texas, Fort Worth, 
lax. 1,60 it, ttfto. Miii-h -II urojectllea for 
6 j fi-1 caliber ginm. Foil Wortli. Nnvy 
biiipa Pnrta Control Center, Muulmnics- 
bui-K, Pn. 

- L'l'V Acroanncc Corn.. Dulljia, Tex. a,- 
aG,DS4. FY 07 procurement f A-7A Air- 
cnift. Dullns, Wnvnl Air SysteniB Cum- 
inniid, 

Wcstlnghoiiaci Electric, PiUshnrHh, 1'n. 
U5 4 406 f OOO. Research nnd development in 
the field of naval initleur nrointlidon. 
Wcat Mlfflhi Boroueh, Pa. Nuvnl Ship 
byfltcma Commnnd, 

General Electric, Washington, D.C. SI - 
020,000. To cHtitblish a twiinin B proem m 
tor the Posoldon Woniion System, PiUa- 
nold. Mass. Special Projects Ollict!. 
) Nfli-foik Sliipynril & Drydoek Corp., Woi- 
folk. Va, $l,Sl)5,333, Topside work in- 
volved in this rcitiilfu- ovcrhnnl of ilia 
oiler USS ELOKOMIN (A0-fi&). Norfolk. 
Industrial Manugur, 5th Nnvnl District. 
Griimmnn Aircritft Enfflncoring Corn,, 
Bothpnge, L.I., N, Y. ?12,JOO,COO. Re- 
scnrch and devoloument moilol EA-OB nir- 
craft. Bothpaec. Nnvnl Air Syntcniti Com- 
mand. 

McDonnell Aircraft, St. Lou IB. Mo. 
$430,000,101)0. Procurement of J-'-4H, F-4D, 
F-IE, F-4J nnd RP-JC nircrnft. St. Loula. 
Nnvnl Air Syattima Coramnnd. 



d "f Rapids, lown. 
UHF radio uetfl. 



52,403,421. Airborne 

mimd Hnr ' da ' Nlivnl " K oyaicma v,om- 
II) Dow f Chemical Co., Midland, Mich. $2.- 
ODO,.. ( ,0. Material for nae in 2.75 inch 
rockets F ndlny, Ohio. Naval Propdhint 
Plnnt, Indian Head, Mil. 

United Aircraft, Pratt & Whitney Div., 
Jist Hartford, Conn. SI. 284, 453. Spare 

FOF and FH aircraft. East Hartford. Navy 
Aviation Supply Ollice, Philadelphia, Vs.. 

Linilcd Aircraft, Hamilton Standard Div., 
Windsor Locks, Conn. 52,080,871. Pro- 
peller system, components for IICl8(iH 
aircraft. Windsor Locks. Navy Aviation 
Supply Offi.ec, Philadelphia, Fa 

bnnstrftnil Corjj., Rock ford, III. SL0.43H,- 
SGO. Components for F-l fighter aircraft. 
Uockford. Nnvy Piu-cliiiHinft Office. Wash- 
iiik'ton, D.C. 

cirT n A.ticrmt CQTP, JJloomtiold COTIII. 
83,307,600. Conversion of UK-2A/R heli- 
copters to a_ twin engine u on IIKVI ration 
uesisnatuil UH-2C phis related ciiuipnient. 
Bloomfielii. Nnval Air Systems Command. 
Slrniglitlinc Mfg. Co., Cornwall Hek-htu 

i> V, B2 1 -" li - Fin blfc for M-Yik 
1 Mod 1 liombH. Cornwell HeiKhts. Nnvy 
phi tin I'ai-ta Control Center, MeclninicH- 
burg, Pa. 

Mills Mfg. Corp., Asheville, N.C. $1,204.- 
000. Parachute and container aHscmhltes 
for Mark 24 nures. Asheville, NHVII] Am- 
ninnition Depot, Crane, Ind. 
Giljbs & Cox., New York 
31,807,731. Contract design 
specification a for a guided missile de- 
stfoyer. Washington, D.C. Naval Shin 
Sy&tems Command. 

I2 ~? c ,"* rnl 1?leelrk - Schencctady, N.Y. $13,.- 
0^7,000. Furnishing of nuclear propulsion 
connionenta. Stlienectjidy. Nnvnl Shin Syn- 
tomsi Commnnd. 

"w^^nl B jJ 1 P bllI Wln Co., Lorntn. Ohio. 
i,^i,b(i5, Conversion of a mnritimc hull 
to a minesweeper miccinl. Lornin. Nnvnl 
Ship Systsims Cnmmim*]. 
rto e r, tl o 1 '" Elcclrlc - West I,ynn, Mass. 2,- 
1127,2414. Snore parts for TG8GE8D engines. 

ni",^ , Ij , ynn ' Ntivy Aviation Supply Ofiico. 
Philadelphia, Pn. 

Spcrry Itnnd Corn., Syosset, L.F., N.Y. 
fl 8.302 ,000. PY 67 technical assistance in 
Clio Polaris inertia! niivlgatlon subsystein 
pi'OKnini. Syoseet, Niivnl Ship Systems 



City, N.Y. 
plans and 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



15 



1C 



e* n tr nn , C MI Sn " Di *fi. Calif. 

53 f 01S,70n. Pii-cbee tiu-Bct drones. San 
JJiejTo. Naval Air Systems Command. 
DcLaval Tnililne, Inc., Trenton. N J. 
*r,.2H3.720, Mwlti-ycar procurement of 
Htcuni turbine Renertitoi 1 nets. HBHoelntccI 
<sqiil|menl and cnglnccrinB Biuiport ncrv- 
iccfl. Trenton. Naval Ship Systems Com- 
mand.. 

~J? n . cc J 1 AllTrnf t Corp., Wichita, Kan. $].- 
704,201 AQM-S7A aerial tarftetu. Wichita. 
Nnvnl Air Systems Commnnil. 
17Kclscy-Hnyca Co., Philadelphia, Pa !2,- 
B I 1 , 10 , 7 ', W" 1 '" "^ for 2.7fi-inch rockets. 
Ihiliidelplitn. Nnvy Ships Parts: Control 
LiGtitor, Mcciin.nlticljnrtj X*n 

-Siterry Rmntf Corp., Groat Neck, L.T.. 
N.Y 58.946,321. Flro control nidiirs for 
terrier missiles. Grent Neck. Nnvnl Ord- 
nance Systems Commnnd. 
I i llC T l Al|lc f t. Stratford, Conn. S3.fiOO.- 
,- l J nK Ieltcl tim e effort anil materlnlfl 
.,'' S" r - 63B lielicoptci's. Stratford. Nnval 
Air Systems Command. 

IS l>ell Induatrlcs, Wnyeross, Ga. $5,770,203. 
Simre parts for fiOO-iiound boniba. Wny- 
crosB. Navy Ships Pnrta Control Center, 
Mcchnnlcsbui-R, Pa. 

Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock 
Co,, Newport News-, Va. $21,055,000. Con- 
atruction of nn attnek cargo ship. S36,- 
300,000. Construction of an amphibious 
force flagship. Newport News. Nnval Ship 
Systems Command. 

A von ilalc S!ii|iynrds, Now Orlemis, La. 
J217.740.000. Construction of 20 ocean 
escort Bhlps. Now Orleans. .Nnval Ship 
Systems Commnnd. 

10 Ministry of Dcloncc, Nnvy Dent,, Unilod 
Kinffdom. SlG,730,fi30. Conatviictlon of two 
aiifvoyins elilpa. Nnval Ship Systems Com- 
mand, 

Ministry of Defence, Navy Dept. , United 
Kingdom. $7,.36<i,8BQ. Construction of n 
salvage tug. Naval Shin' Systems Com- 
mand. 

Northwest Marine Iron Works, Portland, 
Ore, $1,642,761, Modification and repair 



35 



of tlic itilHidli' 1'iinuo InHLriimi'iiliilliiii tihlp 

UHH WJIKHLINfJ, Poi-tliiniL liiilunlrl.il 

Mimniwr. 8th NILVII! IHslrld. 
-Vitro Ciirn. ( Amcrlcii, tillvi'r H|irliiK, 

Mil. $l.<iriH,'JfIII, Mnniiiti'dKint now Ice" in 

annii'Clinn wltli iiyiilcrilii nliciinl iiinTiK'i! 

Hltiiiii, .Silver Hprlnn. Nuvitl Hlii]i KyiiUnnn 

(Jiinimiinil. 
2 Uoi'Vi'H limlnmirlit CM., (ini'deii CMy, !,,!.. 

N.Y. $](M(lH,2ir,. Ciinuiimviitii <if 111.- Mni'k 

(1H llri' roiit.rnl iiyiili'in, (iiirileii I'lly. Nnvy 

Ihii'oluirtliiK ()fili;i>, WiiHlihiHlim, !),(;. 

Furincrs Tiuil Ai .Suji|ily ('urii., licnvi'i-, 

Culn. M.MK.im. CimiiiniiHihi nf nn/./.lii 

niul lln nHtii'inlilii'ii Tur 'l/Hi-lin'li I'm'lu'ln. 

Diinvcr, Navy Hlilpn I'nrlji Curilnil Cmli'i 1 , 

Mi'dnuilniliiiri;. t'n, 
l- (I en mil Dyiiiiinli'H, I'timimii, Cnlif, $H),- 

!l',!r,,()U(l. W.irli mi Hi,, Htiimliml iiilimil,'. 

I'oiniiiiu. Niivul ()i (tiiniu'c Hyulcniit ('utii- 

niiitul. 

I'ulermm llllllilrrH, [iiurKi'on liny, Win. 

S'.V.iNH.Hl'fi, Ciiii!ih'ili!tiM i.r nl\ mih'i'l 

nuilur nunliunlii, Hiiii'in'iin liny, Niiv/il 

Hlilp Synli'inii Cinnmuinl. 

llni'liiH en.. Mori ..... ru. ?i,ii;tv,:r(H mni 

$i:t,:M:i,<i{!t), S|inn> luirtu mill n.lur lihiil<''i 

fur Cll-lli anil nil-Ill Ii,>|||i|i|i|,.ni, Murlnii, 

Nuvy Avintliui Hinnily Ollln-, I'lillnilrl- 

liliin, 1'u. 

AiTiiJot (Jciii'1-nl Ci.rii., Miii'niiii.'iiln, llnllf. 

$l.^ll;t,(lll(). Unrkrl. liiolnni, Huri'i ...... nKi. 

Nnviil (Iril ..... n-i Hyi.ti-niH (!n]))iiihii<l. 

I/rV Arnminxni Tiir]!., Itnllnii, '1V.\. Sl,- 

MlMlfiri, Tirliiilnil 'uri-vlciNi mill nnil I'llnl 

In rnmlnrt n"i'lnl )ll|!lit:i (if liu'id'l ilriinrn 

lit Tniill Miijin, lliilif. Nnviil Air Jiynli'inn 

(liiininuiiil. 

1'Mr Ciirn., Mnn ,|OMI>, Cnllf, i!,ftj:.,r.M. 

Aimcmlily mid prinlinillun nl xiiul wlm'ln 

fur r.V'ri'll iii)i|>lil1iliiuii vi'lilrlt'ii. Imn .litiii'. 

Murlilit (!<ii'|>}i, 

(ii'itt-riil llyiiiiinli'n, l'<iiiiuiiii, Cnllf. S7, 

filHlplKKI, |( ..... mrrll ami ili<Vi'|il|illli',i1 <i|| 111.' 

iiliiiiilnr,) inlimlli-. I'nimimi. Nnvnl Air Ityn- 

toinn (NiniiiniiKl. 

HiilH-il Alri'nifl, HH-iilfui',1, Cnnri. 11.. 

IHIII.IHU). LUIIK Icuil tiin.i rllWl Mini niiH.'. 

rliilii for ril-MIA hi-lln.ulrni fi.r iln> 

Murliiti Turin, Htnilfi.r.l, Nuvnl All fiv- 

Inmi (liiiiiinniiil. 

.toliiin Hiiiildtin tlnlvianll)', Api'Hrd I'lmi- 

Ic'ji LiilKiiiiliiry, Hllvi-r Hi-rlin;. Mil. Siil.- 

(IH7.1HHI. OllllllllICO IVIU'ltM-ll, [lifvrl' ill.l'llln. 

Nnvnl OriliuitK'i! M.VII|I<IIIII Tciii ...... tul, 

Itotlnlti Hlt'i'lrimlfH, Iliinl'-n Cliy, N.Y. 
*],!ll]-l,7:i'l. Cuiiiiniiiini wild wiiiijiuii HIM! 
lilrcriifl iKluiHiini. (JnnlKii irily, Nnviil 
Aviiinlni I-Wlllly, liiilliinnin>l>!>, lu.|. 
tViiHlihiHliin AluMiliiuin (tii,, Hull Inn IH-, 

MI, *a.r,n'j.nvj. AM-;; mm ,.,), u,,, {,. 

'i, '"il" '""'"'IK- Kiilm'iirlKi!, Aln, Nnvtil 
Air Knuliin.Hiii! {',.,il.'.', I'lillii.lnliililn, ], 
JlciiilU Cuni., Mliiliiiwnlui, Inil, ?l,|lH,imii. 

I'illHIIU'crllur mill llnvi'lnliUlriit |i| ( ||ri'iHil 
witli nmuiHulr.l tii'.nliirllui ..... ,| tiu'lli-iil 

t'wl ''M'lii ..... ml .if Din 'r,,hri nilin>|l.., 

Minlunvatiii, Nnviil Onliinniv llyttlriun 

(.'iiHtiinml, 

Hiiullipin HIiliiliiillilliiK ('urii., HlltlHl, I.n, 

Sl.rj-liS.lfiM (!i.inil,iui.|lnii nr hv.i linnlliiK 

"ri, iHilily |l,(!l!|. HlliMI, Niivtil Mhli. 

Hyiili'init Ciiiiuiiiiiiil, 

New York Klil|il>nllillui[ ('uni., Cinn.l.Ni, 

N,J. *l,a:!fi,!!7!l. ll.i^lur >vi-rlinu| i.f 1 1,-' 

njorn tilil]) U!!M HMNKHIH.A (AI-'-RIO. 

i.iimiloit. linliiHlrlnl MIIIIIIHIT. (Hli Nnvut 

DhitrlitL. 

i;clflr Hlilp Itnmlr ('..,, Hnn 1'nini'lnnt. 

('Hlir. Jl,r,ilil,(ini). Dvi-rlnml wurk . ..... n< 

iiliTrufl furiy I1HNH I'HINT CltH/,. Him 
I'l'iiii^ltiDi, Mllllnry l\m Trmi ....... tulli.n 

' 



., t. 

l.m ,m f.iiii ninn-nfi. wip nrn. 

Nnvy Avlnllrm Hninily (Hlln-, 1'lilluili'liililu, 

Wiirit I.l;'ninr Tnitkii Ciirn,, Klinlni 
Hi-WilH, N.Y. ll,DJ.7(iii. Aln-mri tiiwlim 
ruH.ir,,. Klnii,.,, ]|,,| B ht B . Nnvy t., in .i llllt . 
"IK (MHi'fi, WiiHliliiHtnn, !),(!, 
(jriiminiiii Alrcrnft ICnBlnccHiiB Curii., 
Hclliiiiim*, N.Y. $n,UI7,:ir,n, i-'Y flu i.rn. 
fnircini>ni i.f AfiA nin-nift, Nnvii! Air Hv. 

tClllll (NiniDIIUKl, 

MnKiifivox Cd,, l.',,ri Witynu, Irul. H.na?.. 
(J.I. UcHlttii ri'Viisw. iliv(<|ii|inii.|ii, fnlirlrn- 
lluii fiml u>nl ur ]in<i>r<HltiRlliiit mi>iloli< nf 
11 n vlriilrntili; citiitilwi'mi!iiNiii'o iiyiilnnr inn! 
Hi (iuiiilina llnliirxi iniKluvorliij! file 111" 
[tmttrnm, I-,in Wiiyno, Nnvnl All- HyMfmn 
('uinmiintl. 

-lUllKoii Co., Dnlfnnl. Mmm. ||,?tn,i7H. 
KuHuin-oh niul (loveloi)mi-tit on lliu 



mliiHlli-. Ui'iirmil. Nnvnl Air Kyuli'iiin Cmn 

innriil. 

lli'iu'rul llynnmli'M, Kurlirnici 1 , N.Y, f 1 . 

I'lTi'lvcr ni'lii, llni'lii'nlt'r. Nnvy Avinllnii 
iiniHily nillrr. nillnnVltililn, I'u. 
lli'llilrlii'iu Hii'i'l I'..,, Miilink.'ii, N,,!, St.- 
III',:!,:!!)). Iti'iinlni' .ivi'i'liniil ut thi- iiinmmil 
linn nM]i HUH CKMAT .'il'I'KIN I ATM ,' t , 
H.'lnilii'ii. Imlu'iiHnl MIIIIIU:' r, :ii il Nuvi.l 
Dliiti'lrl, 



AIR FORCE 



I KCA, I'll ..... Inn, N..I, Sl..u>(Mni. 1'nnjni 

linn (if rnniiiillllii'iil hill mill i>li i' 1 1 null rin 
liiiln.nlii fi'i' mnii'i' I'iiirlHh'ii 1'ilin.lini 
H|ini')( ,'lynli'iiiii Hlv., lAl'SI'), l,i>n ,\n- 
Ki'li'K, I'nllf. 
Iliinini I'liiitliii't'iliiH I'll,, Jliiiiiifi.nl, I'.. mi, 

si,'' 1 "', ...... . rniiiuHi ...... r iii.ii.'iui ,:.-ii, ; .., 

I'liilnr iiyiilrnln. M! Hill fun I ;!|NI,'.- iiv'iili'in i 

Dlv,, |AI''!H'|, I.,,, Anc.l.M, n.ltf. 
II li'iilirlillil lllllrr Cdii.., !i( Aiiiiu.lin.., 1 In. 
Sl.l.'W.iiVli, H.'iiiitf nl i'-im i.li, mil. ;i|, 
Aiiisuiitlti.'. Wnni.'i' It, .Mini Ah MM,- ( J.-l 
Ann, (Ari.Ci. It,, lihi" AIM, lln, 
linlli'il Alrcriid, |M,:I| llnilfm.l I'.om 
Sf.i.Hmi.lnl. I'l-iilu.-n ..... ,f ,,|,pu,. mil.; {.<> 
Hi.' .L.'iV nln'i'iid I'tudiix, KnJit IliiHf.'i.l. 
K.'lly ATlt. '\',-\. 

(.'I'llrrul Mnllim, |ii>llnii(i|i..|l>i, In. I. sr,,:,',!,. 
INI, I'l'niln, it,,,, nf (',;,(; (.li.-inn I'hi-lm -, 

IIIKl I'l'lllll'll ll|lti|UI)l 111. llMlhllllLl.i.ll', All-' 

niiullcnl llvilriiin UK-,, | A I 'NO. Witrlit 
I'nllcf.i.ill A I'll. dill. i, 

llncliiK Cii., Wli'lilln, Kim, ?i,|i:u;,ii>,;. Ixiii 
I'm' ll.l>',' \v|iu; niul l.mlv iMiinliinil IMIN|[. 
ll<-iilliiii. Wlrlilln, Ol.hil ...... ji riu All Mi" 

li-rli'l An-ii, lAI-'l.l'i. Tlhl.n Al'H, I'l.ln, 
fiirllmi Wiliiln f',.i|i,, \V ..... I lli.li'i- N .1. 

Sl.mi|,!>l>!. Ovriliihil ,,f ,Ml;, ,,!,, ,,,f ( , 

!')". W ..... lltl.li;,-. lii.lly AI'll, 'I 1 , > 
I N>iillini|) I'.irii., Annliolm, C,,Hr 3!,'","" 

1 ..... I'l'iilili'll.in n( (1 lin,.(l IM.I.H \MH 
Ki'inlrt, A null. I in, A ...... niiilj.'iil jitnh I.n. 

i'lv., i AMU 1 ), WilFliLi'iin..!..,,,, ,M n. 

(lIllK. 

I hi u lir n Alu'tnll, Culv..i I'llv, 1'i.ttf, s: 1 , 
li'V.l.liini, \Vnil ...... in nlt.t|,.,,i,i f,,,.,, ,,,|,,,|l. 

inililiuii-n |irni;i'iii, I'nli'.T Tin lii'.>i.,m 
KiHThiri.ilnn i;,, ii.i,, \Vtt,-tH l ( nll,'i-..n 

Ai'ii. niiin, 

Acrnilr*. Inr,. Mtninl, ](, ; ,r;V, IK,,. 

IK'nl'lliml ,,f ,|-!,V nllrl'lift ,. h( ,|,,,. t , Hl.,1,,), 

Ki'llv AMI, 'IVi. 

IHM. Wn'ililntriiiit, h,C, ?r P ,"M,r,:n, j'<n 

.Iiu-.. ,if |,-nr<i-,| niminiivf LV...I ..... ,, ;'V;.i.tl, 

Air KIH..I Wlnir, Will-In. I'nii,.!,!!, i, Al II, 

ylilu. 

'I'l ..... i|>"i'ii'l(niiii..\\'in,|il,|K P . Inc.. |l,,|i,Miln 
H.-ni-li, Chllf, l,.iti;i,VMii, Wniti ,,h n i!|.n>.< 
' 



. ' ",,. ...yxm ..... ! ..... 
1-rn.lni-Hnii ,,f lriillitin-,1 ,!!,, in M|, ,!.., 
mull III lil.ilni,,, HIIII ...... .,,,, || U || (! ,M,- 

j'.V'jjitm lHv,. (AK.'UH. N...I,,,, Al H. 

(< Arii.|fMJi'IIB,l Cniii., Ihti-i'iihi.-nli' I'nHI, 
Ili.tt'.'MIIIII, OvrlllHill. (ml i.h.l , ..... M ..... 
i'"iv iv.i hi mi|<| ..... ,,f ((. TITAN II I>K- 
lilllnln,, |<)||i||ii> ftV-ili-m. Siii'il.lili-.il,. UMI|,.|I 

Ar Mnlnlul A.,-,1, (Al'l.lii. ||||| Al U. 

1'lnli, 

A^liilli.ii Iiivi-Biiiiriitn, In,.,, Miiinil I In 

* ji/H.-isn). ih'HfTiin,, ( ,,,,| ,,,!,. ,,, ,-., v 

;ili|nifl Mlniiil. W,,,,!,.,-.!!,,!,!,,,, Air M. 
jM'Icl An-ii. lAI'Mi'l. ll-l',,,, Al-'ll, ti.,. 
(.Miri-nl Mnhirit. Mllwmiliiv, W|a 81 'ino 

I. 11 , 1 !- W '"" k ..... "' l"Hltll I'lllll,,,,,.,, ,,VMll',,l, 

Mllwiiiil,,'.', Him, 1 ,. |Ivr.li-ni-. |l| Vl , iAMtl'1 

t.tl'i AllifrU-i, Cnllf, 

MHRIUVMK Co.. J'-.il Wv..... !t,,|. II.VH;.- 
II... 1 i;n.liii'll.,ii nf i.hvMiri ri.mimihli^ll.oi 

MI '" '''/A',.. V 1VI "; A.-mihi-Hl..,! rUnl.i..!. 
I'lv.. lAI'tllil. \V.lHl t |..|',,M..,,.,,, AMI. 

iMmrJ!"?. 1 ' ''" r|l<l WH.I.IIIWI.,,,, I.r 
'.';".. nuiii-nit,',. ,,,M|VI,M. lit),.,,. N .v, 
WrM ilO'iiHi-rni.ii AI-'H. lilil.,, 

lllir " 1 ' Allpl Afl ""' wi'-t'. :-- 



n i ', .-, iLmi M-.v.-r, 
f'll- 111.' AilvilM.T.l Itlilllr,)!,. Hr..,, tlv (i vn . 

It-ill |ir.iKm . (iiinlcn I'lly, Hullhtl.- H v .,. 

ri i t "V'i. IAIHi: !' . f ?"" 11 " Al "' '""' 
J mlnml l'[iiiiimllr Tool (',. t!|> ;V Hiiiui. 

"in". u,r.(i7.iaK. iT.,,1,.,.11,.,, '..r i", ^ 

wiir M,MiiH t ii,,tiU f,.r !'.! ..imi. .. 

nm AKS'' M|I|M1H Al ..... 



N.Y. ai..li:i....|.,. Ailvm^Mnmn? 111 ' 

': ' "'"">" Hi l.-r HP,, I,,, .'m, 

1 {'i!','';','.' 1 ' 1 ' 1 , 1 , 11 A '- | ;>""li<-nl Jiynt,,,,^ j 

Nut III Aiuvrlnin AvInYlmi" Inl^'A^nhJin, 
r!,'iir M ' !t " lv " lAl '' fi( 't. Ni.i-t/M, AKlt 

l.'i-iiriiit iDiiiiiul.'f,, rmu-nlr i)| v<| y nn 

' ll ' 1 ' 1 ''." ' "' Ailii'i.Ani'iiii ,S|.iii',. |i t(( , 

..li.'.,.n l.m A,,,;,. |, , :iii.- t < i'm"!!i,,Alri 

';;;[;; A * r - iAri,i'i. Mri-Mi,,,, A KH, 

Siiiiil,-.,! A^.Hlnh-,, Hnt.,1,1, N,II, $|,;|GJ,. 

'"' ."; " "' I'liiH.i.i,. n , in,.,;. 

"". i . I' . "' "i"'!" 1 "''!!. Nai.liini, A.m. 
r <>". '>.-.i' 'A!' Ii!' 'ii)ii',',!" lA1 ' fil11 ' Wf W |1 ' 
""''.-.I Ali.n.d, I,:,,,,, iiiii-ir.ml. I'mm, 
M.' ( 'l.'"'', :.|',n.- i<m1 f,,,- J.r/f ,,||,. rn | t 

l1 "''. ''-''< Ha, i| , Krlly Al-'ll, 'IVi. 

I.' Nmil. Ainril.i.i, Ailnllim. Auloiiclici 
Hi*,, AI>II[II>IMI, I'tdif, sin. ;:i.i, .mi), Dfjiui, 

"'"I 'lurl-'f I i.( l-l 1. (nil Hi- 

i-i-,.. f,,i !|,,, Ml.,,,!.,!,,!,!. Mlnull,., Aim- 

lii li'i Itiillhil,. :ii nfriiii, HIv,. (AI'SUI, 
N" ill, i| Al II, I'nllf, 

" '' ' "'lit. ('..., Ahum, Mliln, jl..|ni ( . 

/:-.-. I'n.n.i.ini-ul ,,f ].'. | t ,| n . n i((. || k ,,. 
Al n Hi'il, ii Air Mnl.'ilrl Am 
I Al l.l'i. Mtll Al II, Htiili. 

BI >" L| . '!'" '-"ii'I'icl fii1li;i..i iriln on 

''''I i.li.'ii.n I. I1,-,i.|i, VViirncr 

lt..|iin=i Ali Miii.-ittil A it-ii IAI''I,C], 
llnl.)n> Al II. Im. 




, 
IJrurinl Mi.f.nn, Imllnhnt"!]!.!, Illil, SI,. 

.I:HI,''.M l'inti>hu'rtt tif mililtin Mmlf-t fur 

I' '.Ii . ii|:tn.-> lixlJii.iliin.IlM, IlLliJiitlmi City 

' 



ti.-HLM(lt l'i,t|l.. !!;,r|(llll.'lllll, CllllI, 
ll.'iill?" I'f .HI Illll-llllfl'll l"l"l 

1. 1 .^], .,!,!,, n\ .-,!, n, f,,r Iiiillllhtic 
Air 



lii Unit AlM-rnfi Ctiin.. Jim, Anton!", T.K, 
II, (,'*,', '.',!. IK. .l.iuil .,f I'urlalh' Aijni' 
"I'luti (Itiiiitiit )-:>|ii>i>iiirii! Mii.ilni'i niul ii 1 - 

f!:ni Anln.il.i Alt' Muh'ilcl A r i-ii, IAH,(!)i 
tv-lh' AI'll, Ti,. 

nf u hi ..mini. I D|iiti'ii luinirli vrtili'li 1 , Run 

An,:.-l, .1. I'-nlK," *' 

llfnulro, In.',. Wllmlii|!li.n. Di-l, *!H.' 

''^' , I'M. ill, i ll.it, nf illt.K" 111 rilM"" 

f'-r htintid ti-ttti II iiilii:ill(-ii, MIII:IIH, lllu'i. 
It.itlt'-U,' liv'.lft.in hlv,, (AI'Mrj. Norton 
Al-'ll, C,,l.f. 
I 1 ' Ann Ct.i|... I,i,fc,r I'Kv. Fin. Ct.EJt.MJ- 

l,Mhp ritv, Wi,i,n:,' t(>.lilim' Alr 
A...I. lAH.Cl. It.il.lhPi AI-M, (in. 
Myn-lPiitK llpirldjiiitrnl I'.irii., Miititn Mr" 1 ' 
!''. ''nllf, Il.-itin.imn, It'-ji.-uvrti nrui in"' 
1-i'nli-iv niJi MI. iiif.iiniiilliin i-rffWJW 
iM'liMttiuf'i t'"'i;MHit, Hunni Mmilcji. W'*' 

."'ii \'M<\. Mw-i, 

Jn N -ii Hi AlHFtlrMii Avlttllnii. I^in AriBi'l*'- 
I'fllU, (l.iiiin.iiiiit. Kin- Itir'-f Imt, t".'Iil f ' 1 ' 

Jill.) nl<|.i.it nnivli-i-w far tllO X*lT. 



Soptembor 1966 



ticnl Systems Dlv., (AFSC), Wright-Pat- 
terson. AFB, Ohio. 

-Motorola, Inc., Scottsdale, A via. $1,137,- 
600, X-bnnd commim Scutum nets. Scotts- 
da!c. Oklahoma City Air Muter iel Area, 
(AFLC), Tinker AFD, Okla. 
Boelnff Co., Wichita, Kan, $4.100,000. 
Modification kitfl for R-52 nireraft. 
Wichita, Oklnhonm City ir Materiel Area, 
(AFLC), Tinker AFB, Okla. 
It. F. Goodrich Co., Akron, Ohio. $1,720.- 
510. Tire tubes foi- C-130 aircraft. Akron. 
Ofi-dcn Air Materiel Area, (AFLC), Hill 
AFB, Utah. 

Hnyer Inlernational Corp., Birmingham, 
Alii. $4,758,438. Inspection and repair as 
necessary of C-124 aircraft. Birmingham. 
Wnrner-Hoblns Air Materiel Area, 
(AFLC), Robins AFD, Ga. 
United Aircraft, Eaat Hartford, Conn. $1,. 
173,fi20. Production of components for 
J-67, T-34 and TF-33 nireraft engines. 
East Hartford. San Antonio Air Materiel 
Area, (AFLC), Kelly AFD, Tex. 
22 Boeing Co., Seattle, Wuwh. $50.824,000. 
Production of Mimitetnnn II mlmiiles mill 
related equipment. Seattle. BnlliHlSe 8yn- 
tems Div., (AFSC), Norton AFB, Calif. 
General Motora, Indianapolis, Iml. SI,- 
2B1.2M. Turbine blades for T-r.fi eiiKinoa. 
Indinnapnlls. Oklahoma City All- Materiel 
Arcu, (AFLC), Tinker AFH, Okla. 
United Aircraft, East Hartford, Conn. 
$2,033, -1 BO. Production of aircraft cnftlno 
components. East Hartford. San Antonio 
Air MuUiHel Area, (AFLC), Kelly AFH, 
Tex. 

-"Cessna Aircraft, Wichita, Kan. $a,fJQn,000. 
Modification of T-37 aircraft to AT-S7 
ponfiKumtlon, Wichita. Aeronnutical SVH- 
t*m Dlv., (AFSC), Wri K ht-Pattcm>n 
AFH, OliSo. 

23-United Aircraft, East Hartford, Conn. 
81,107,487. Production of spare* parts for 
the J-67 aircrnft engine. Rant Hartford. 
Sun Antonio Air Materiel Avon, (AFLC), 
Kelly AFB, Tex. 

Racine Co,, Wichita, Kan. $2,081,444. 
FV 67 entilacering nnd mipport services! 
for tho B-G2 fleet. Wichita. Oklahoma City 
Air Materiel Area, (AFLC), Tinker AFH, 
Okln. 

--lliisliCB Aircraft, Fiillerton, Cnlif, Sl,- 
200,000. Development of overland radar 
technique!!. Fullcrton. Acronnnticnl Syw- 
lemfi Div., (AFSC). WrlKht-Pattoi-son 
AFB, Ohio. 

MM.LT., CambrldBo, Mnsa. $1,200,000. 
Work on an advanced aenaor pro(?rnm. 
CBnibridKfi, SyBtomn EnftincerinK Group, 
JAl'SC). WrlKht-PaUei-flon, AFB. Ohio, 
--H.1.1., Cnmlirlilfto, Mans. $3N,700,000. Itc- 
enrcli nnd development on lulvnncod elec- 
tronic proRi-amH. Loslnston, MaHit. Elec- 
trnnic iSysleniB Dlv., (AFSC), I,. G. HaiiH- 
C{im Field, Mnan. 

25 UnUctl Aircraft. Windsor Locka, Conn. 
*l,fi*],9J>7. Overhiml and modllleatlon of 
Jilrcnifl propellei-H. Kast flranby. Coan. 
\VaniDi-.Hnblim Air Materiel Arua, 
(Al'LC), Robinfl AFB. Gil. 
!6--Annlylirnl Scrvlcca, Inc., Falls Church, 
Vn. Sl.aJO.onO. Analytical ittudicH ]iortnln- 
IRK to the application of weapons HyHtcmH. 
-Mils CEmrch. Air Force Onicc of Scien- 
tific Hesenrch, 

Conliueiitnl Aviation and Ensincci'lntr 
Corn,, Detroit, Mich. $l,0f>0,000. Work 
on nn advanced turbine nan gonorntor pro- 
?H151v, Detrolti Aei-onautlcnl Systems Div., 
IAFSC), WriKht-PattorBon AFI1. Ohio. 
0~Systin Development Corp., Santa Monica, 
Calif J 14,000,032. Design and development 
of electronic Information nnd communi- 
cations equipment, Snnta Monlcn, Elcc- 
troniu Byetema Dlv., (APSO), L. G. Hnna- 
com I'lcM. MaHH. 

~iKS lrcrnft ! Clllve ^ c ^y, Calif, $1(1,- 
jSG.OOfl. Convoi-Blon of AIM--IC to AIM-4D 
) nireraft nilflallca, Tucaon, Aria. 
Ilobina Air Materiel Area, 

,- ,, JtobinB AFB, Ga. 

Stewart & Stcvcntjon Services, Inc., 
Houston, Tex, $1,281,423, Production of 
K5?. vy 'i llt y cloctrlciil Keneratoi'B, HoiiBton, 

A roil, 



USAF Invites 15 Firms 

To Submit- Proposals 

for Computer Systems 

Fifteen computer manufacturers 
have been invited by the Electronic 
Systems Div., Air Force Systems 
Command, L. G. Hanacom Field, 
Mass., to submit proposals for in- 
stalling 100 to 160 electronic data 
processing- systems at Air Force 
bases throughout the world. 

The firms were given until Nov. 30 
to submit their proposals to the Elec- 
tronic Data Processing <EDP) Equip- 
ment Office at Electronic Systems 
Div., in what is expected to be the 
largest single acquisition of commer- 
cially available computers ever under- 
taken, 

The equipment represents the sec- 
ond phase of the Btise Level Data 
Automation Standardization Program. 
Colonel S. P. Stoffes, bond of the 
EDP Equipment Office, has suggested 
that small business firms, or others 
interested in sub-con trnctiiifi; oppor- 
tunities in connection with this pro- 
gram, make direct contact with the 
firms invited to submit proposals. 

The fifteen invited companies are; 
Burroughs Corps,, Collins Radio, Com- 
puter Control Co., Control Data Corp., 
Friden Inc., General Electric, Gc'ii- 
eral Precision, Honeywell, I.B.M., 
Lear-Sieglor, National Cash Register, 
Philco, H.C.A., Scientific Data Systems 
and Sperry Rnnd. 

_ Evaluation of proposals and selec- 
tion will be done according to stand- 
ard Air Force selection procedures. 
Acquisition of equipment will be made 
under existing General Service Ad- 
ministration schedules. 



3l *~ t< M e n d o 1 ^ lr ^ rnft ' ^ HBt HHPtford, Conn. 
51,618,318, Production of components for 
?I_I ""r? T ' 3 ? niroriift enfilncB. Bast Hnrt- 



The Cify of Grnnil ForkB,' N.D. $1,730,000. 
AiSn ellS x,r, wn ^ 1 ' BU ly it Grand Forks 
V ^i;" 1 Grnnd Forks AFD Prooure- 
nnsnt Omce. 



New Security Manual 
Available to Industry 

Tho latest edition of tho Industrial 
Security Manual for Safeguarding 
Classified Information (ISM)- has 
been distributed by tho Defense Sup- 
ply Agency and is now available for 
purchase. 

Copies of tho now manual can ho 
ordered from the U.S. Government 
Printing Office, Washington, D.G., 
20402 for $1.50. Ordor by Catalog 
Number: D3.6/3:SE 2/960. 

The manual establishes uniform 
security practices within Industrial 
plants or education institutions and 
all organizations and facilities used 
by prime and subcontractors having 
classified information of the Defense 
Department. 

Because of the variety and scope of 
revisions, a resume of tho changes has 
been prepared as an introduction to 
the now manual. 

Contractors should begin revising 
then- Standard Practice Procedures 
(SPP) so that the revised SPP will 
reach the cognizant security office by 
November 1966. 



Nuclear Vulnerability 

Assessment Responsibility 

Assigned to AFS WC 

Responsibility for assessing the 

vulnerability of operational weapon 
systems to the effects of nuclear ex- 
plosions has been assigned to the 
/,?^ co s P e cial Weapons Center 
(AFSWC) at Kirtland AFB, N. M., 
by the Air Force Systems Command. 
Ihe center, commanded by Colonel 
Kalph S. Carman, has conducted 
laboratory and field tests to simulate 
the effects of nuclear explosions for 
several years. 

A. new office has been established 
under the center's Deputy for Test 
and Engineering. This office will ana- 
yxe and, if necessary, test under simu- 
lated conditions the ability of opera- 
tional Air Force aircraft and missiles 
to survive and operate in wartime 
nuclear environments. It will conduct 
vulnerability assessments on a con- 
tinuous basis in light of new nuclear 
eltects knowledge gained from under- 
ground tests, theoretical studies and 
eftccts simulation tests. 
Tho Systems Command's Air Force 
Weapons Laboratory, also located at 
Kir tl and AFB, will continue its de- 
velopment of new simulation tech- 
niques for AFSWC and will support 
the center with effects data and com- 
puter services. 



Contractor's 
Training Guide Available 

A publication titled, "Contractor's 
Iraimng Manual," which is a sec- 
tionaliKcd compilation of the individ- 
ual specialised training requirements 
of the Army, Navy, Air Force and 
A , National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, has been released by 
the Aerospace Industries Association 
(AIA). It was prepared by task 
groups of industry training manage- 
ment specialists under the cognizance 
of the AIA Product Support Com- 
mittee. 

Tho manual is a complete set of 
guidelines, in one volume, from which 
tho criteria governing hardware and 
personnel training requirements can 
bo established. It can aid in the 
preparation of training proposals, 
and it can be of particular assistance 
in the final formation of complete 
training programs. 

It is intended that the manual will 
benefit all organizations, both large 
and small, including the experienced 
contractor who may find it necessary 
to reorient his organization to a new 
customer and a changed requirement 
that is beyond his existing experi- 
ence. 

Copies of the manual, in limited 
quantities, are available at $5,00 each. 
Requests should be forwarded to: 
Aerospace Industries Association 
1726 DeSales St. NW 
Washington, B.C. 20086 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WASHINGTON. D. C. 203O1 



POSTAGE AND FEES PAID 



OFFICIAL BUSINESS 



Military Kept Moving During Airline 
Strike by MTMTS/ Labor Cooperation 

When five major airlines were idled by a strike July 8, knocking 
out more than 60 percent of the nation's air-passenger capacity, 
movement of military personnel had to go right on, uninterrupted. 

For the Armed Forces it was a particularly bad time for n trans- 
portation tieup. In addition to normal traffic, thousands of re- 
servists were on the move in connection with annual two-week 
summer training- sessions. Since arrangements are made- well in 
needT movement dates ' much administrative reshuffling was 

With no added personnel, the Military Traffic Management and 

temTto vl e nh ICe J MT ^T S) beg ' an 2 ^ 111 ' OP"'"* in an at! 
tempt to resolve the problem. 

About July 1 actions were taken to reroute Defense QToun- 
movements, scheduled on the affected airlines for July 0, 7 andT'. 
the 6th being the earliest date the strike could legally be call od. 

Un July 5, Major General John J. Lane, MTMTS comnvinHov 
alerted his nationwide command, and the Milt ary SvX for 
carrying out the terms of the emergency transSon pllS ' 

the Srt^t^S r amvhile ' met With ^"aentati of 

he impac of tii Sf Prepare memoranda which described 

u/iLiT 1 stllke on national defense, and the means hv 

w *^"^^il transportation could be uS ^ 



were rerouted and moved withnnt 1 T i 
cers rounded up indivfduals Trf Si Cal trans l )0 *'M<>n offl- 
them into groups of 15 o7 ml Ti? P Ups and consolidated 
charter ^^\lJ^^^ MTMTS to 

Cation which c 2S&, 



Navy Aquanauts 

Get Permanent 

Home in San Diego 

A permanent homo [mil nn>l 
{lining facilities Tor .Vary 
its assigned Lti DIP M.n;. 
in-Lliu-Sua program IUI.H IHTII ac- 
tivated in San Oiojvo, ('iilif. 
The aqimnaut base, calN ti\e 

Project Tottlmienl (Illicit (fJSS 
PTO), IK located al, I hi- Sninnn- 
rino Support KaeiliLy, Hulfj^l 
Point, San Diego. 

Tlie tuuhnical oOlno proviik.; 
curt'ituila, HelKMluloH and fm;iti- 
tiew for train ing Navy ;ii|ii:i- 
mints. In addition, Ui nrw i-tlia 1 
will rurnisli oiuriiuterhur, u- 
noardi, toHtiiitf and tirhnir.-0 
Horvicos for Hpocdlit! Navv up- 
orational 



tion of (MJoan 
porimonts invo 
nnce evaluation of ocoan ( 
neorln# hard ware, x\w\\ 
diving- snitH and air 
e(]uipniont for divert 
( It; i.s cHtimated that 
diver Lraining in all a., r ,.,.. 

advaneod diving toehniiim 1 * 

be avail/ible at the now ollici? Jr 
about 18 months. 

Capt. Walter K Max/fine. Mr, 
who served as physiological con- 
trol ofllcor during both f Hie 
Navy's SKALAH oxperinipnls. 
hns been named Oflkot'-in- 
Chixi-gG of the new aq nan an t wri- 
ter. The 1 ofllce will lie alalltol by 
15 oflicers and 43 enlisted nii'ti. 



Volume 2 No. 10 



October 1966 





IN THfS ISSUE 



<( 



for Project Miningcm 



1 

3 

AII Ovmlinv .if Air Korce Procurement " "" '" ~ J 

I lit' HncrKtrnllmi Aiijtnmrli and NAIM8 "" " 1K 

I'-tliii'iilliiniil 'I'"-- 1 ' * " ' 

Prulrcl AIMS 



DEPARTMENTS 
A hunt Pni|iU' 



Cwh-inlnr of 
S|H'iiln-ni 

nntl M 



'riu-iirciiH'nt 



Logistics in Vietnam 



3G 



9 

U 
18 
21 

24 
25 
42 




"Thin conflict will take the bent we Imvc the fluent men nnil the 
!*(, Miiltftl fur (he Jli nntl lo tlo it alno lukea the J>est 

in lli world. , . . About it million different kinds of items nrc iicctlc 
hup|ty tiur Army totlny. . . All Ihcsc llcntH ntiiHt be designed, tested, mm 
rturrd. (mcHil iintl Hlilnpcil to n wiilcr port In-country and, flnally, d< 
hut-red to (lio men nt the trlKKerw of the wcaponH and mnny of the viti 
link in Ou* InHlwHcrt clmht are clvlllnit Industrial links not military ones 
'Urulcnmu (ienprfll L. J. Lincoln, USA, Deputy Chief of Stuff for Logistic 
I'. H, Army. 

Hr> nrllc-li?. "Amcrlenn IndiiMlry nnd the Logistic Bridge to Our Fiphtln 
/* twginnliiK on pftRO 1. 



To insure prompt delivery of Christmas gifts sent 1o service- 
men stationed overseas, the I'osl Ollice Depjirlment urges (hal all 
packages sent by regular postage be mailed by November II) and 
all nil 1 mail parcels be sent no later than December 10. 

Parcels addressed to service-men in Vietnam Mia!, weigh no 

more than five pounds and measure no more (ban 111) indies in 

length and girth combined may be mailed at Hie ordinary poslaj.'.e 

1 rate and be transported by air on a spare-available bash; between 

San Francisco and Vietnam. 

Thorp are at present no plans for a special Defense Depart- 
ment airlift of bulk collections of (Ihrislnias gift a for Mrrvicrmen 
this year. 

The Post OIHce Department million;* llml, K 'ir|, ; should I.,, 
securely packed in cartons of \yood, nntlal, or double -Cared HUTU 
gated fiber board and that fragile items In: surrounded by cushion- 
ing materials such as excelsior or shredded paper. 

t Matches, lighter fluid and .similar llnnmuible items are pm- 
hibited from the mails. (Jhwik wilh your local post olllce Cm- delails 
or these and other restrictions as well as .me and weight iimitn 
tions applicable to mail destined Cor cmlain geographic areas. 

To insure the safe arrival of gills, packages slmnld be wrapped 
securely and the addresses written (Mtrred.lv and hrililv ii'iiin- the 

appropriate live-digit Al'O or KI'O number'as parl, of t'he addr i 

As inn added assurance, place a duplicate lahe). which plainly -ihmvi 
both the addressee and the return address, inside I he p.m-kmT 
., Mail intended for an unspecified addressee will nol b ( > <i<venlcil 
Mail for servicemen must ho addressed to a named individual in- 
to a specific military unit. 




1'nblirihi'il hy (|M- 



linn. Kuhnl S, MrNitmnrn 

Mrn.-lnr.v uf l),.f P n K c 

' 



linn, Arllnir S> 



of 



. 

('til. .hid H, SlcithciKi, IfSA 
IMii-cIni- for ('oniinuiiily 
('til, MiUln ('. (J||, -mu. USA 
riih-C, llunliu-.-iFi^ l.ulior 



I'Milur UMr. I-:, W. llrmlfiird. UHN 
A'uit'. ;.(!..! .MM.. <VHIift 1'nllok 
A. M tur, Mr, lUrli I,,, Kalce 

I'.ililoi Jill A'fihiluiil 

Noiiiliin !:, Wniiil, J01, 1JSN 

^n, ,(,, 
ly liy |]H> HiUilni'Htl 
l.nlt.ii' tHvithjnii. Jiiri'i-jtiruM* for 
Ki-liitliiiin, (iillm nf tlm 



It.' Atfuti'.-,). |ti,.. ,,t riiiHlti fur 

Ihl'i liul'liriillon \vnii it|i|il'nvr ( | liy (] m 

Ulnvlur ni' M,r ||inv jm ( (J m HII,| K( ,( I 

I In' |>iir|t>,^i ,,f tin- llttUflin In 



- - J---II-I--PH III * 11 M-II;UT 

i' nut iui.i it-, aiitiiiit'i'.Tii i(|{i-tu'if><i 

HIM! .!,<li'ji>..i I'.ijilr.'ii't'tni Mini iilliiT 

1 '"''ji" lHl.'|-.,t'l. H will ,;,, r vi, ut, 

ii r.nlih' IK fmlitnliy i-nnn-i'iiliiK nil!- 
fin jititli'tr-i |ifH H niint! ninl |trojcctn t 
mill -A ill jirt-li |M t.tJHiiiliittt llmiidlll liy 
m.'iiilt.'r,i t-r ll.c ili.rnihv tinlunlry l-miu 
PI iii*li-inK III" iir.ililriiiii Dint nitiy nrino 
In riilUllluft Hi" ffciiilivinitiitii of till! 
iMlli. 

MuhMlul JH UH- nultrtiti itt mi- 

MUht itf i||h'|r; : r IM |1| ( . |,ui!itir!!!l nilll- 

niiinity. Jiiiiui' !'Hnti frutii Iniliiiilry 
i'i^irfvt<niiilivi-!j Cur lojilr.'i lo ln> cuv- 
'!''( In futui-K hii.n.'M >iluMil<l In* for- 

Mivhilnll. 

Thn Ittitlistin IH tKhLfiliiiti'd without 
I'lnu'Ki' i-iiclt niMitlh In rt'iinwiittitivfH 
f iiniiidlry HIM! (M im.'iii'irM of (lit! I)n- 
Mrti -uiH'iil of l)tri'ii!i.', Army, Ntivv iinrl 
Ail' I'lpnv-, iii^jnt'slii fur i'0|d(.'!t iiliniild 

liJlV'.Unl (<i (lie HllMJIIi'liH ft Ll 



i; Mruon, urtMJJ(l'A), Kmnil 2KHli 
I'M' IV'titiiK-.H, Wtiwhdifjion, H.C, -i 
ll'iftl. li'li'|iIiMM'', OXfni'il fi't{7(H). 
I'itiitiMiU tif t)i niiiKHi'iim! may Iw 
tlfl fn^ly wllliiiut r^iiiiCHllnff 
ssiftfi. Mi'htitin of tlii wmtrco will 

. ^. ... i . i i 




The following is taken from a brief- 
ing for representatives of business and 
industry given by Lieutenant General 
1. J, Lincoln, USA, Deputy Chief of 
Staff for Logistics, U. S, Army. 

Through nine major wars and 
, countless minor actions the industry- 
military team has functioned in sup- 
port of our national policy and na- 
tional defense. We in the Department 
of Defense are conscious of the tre- 
mendous and vital contributions to 
our past victories that the industry 
half of the team has made. 

Today our military strength, backed 
by the producers of this nation, is 
committed, with other free world 
forces, in still another war. To the 
soldier it is just that war, whether 
or not it is a declared one a dirty 
war, fought under the hazards of con- 
stant heat, drenching 1 monsoons, or 
gritty dust against an almost unseen 
enemy who has 20 years of conflict 
behind him. It is the third war for 
this generation of Americans. This 
conflict will take the best we have 
the finest men and the equipment 
best suited for the job and to do it 
also takes the best logistical system 
in the world. 

Logistics has long been a science 
and is becoming to some extent an 
Da-rt In the modern world. The require- 
jsjments to support our forces on a 
^ world-wide scale become staggering 
3 and resolve themselves into military 
demands on our economy all facets 
j of the economy. The job of supplying 
> a rifleman in a paddy field, or in a 
I field of elephant grass almost 9,000 
i miles away from the production base, 
makes great demands on logistical 
enterprise, This enterprise is by no 
means a purely military one. About 
a million different kinds of items are 
needed to supply our Army today to 
include those who are fighting in the 
deltas and highlands of Vietnam, 
About half of these items are pro- 
cured by the Defense Supply Agency. 
All these items must be designed, 
tested, manufactured, packed and 
shipped to a water port or airfield in- 
country and, finally, delivered to the 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



men at the triggers of the weapons 
and many of the vital links in the 
logistic chain are civilian industrial 
links, not military ones. Thousands of 
contractors all over the United States 
are deeply involved in the various 
elements I've mentioned. I don't mean 
to imply that American industry is 
not frequently located close to the 
troops it supports. American industry 
is in range of Viet-Cong guns in 
Southeast Asia today. I received a 
letter from a civilian friend who 
works for an American contractor in 
Vietnam who is constantly with in 
range and subjected to Viet Cong 
fire. However, there is a military 
logistic bridge even there. Military 
logistics must plan, budget, contract 
and administer. 

I said we 'depend on industry and 
you may well ask how. I'll mention 
some of the ways we depend on you 
the business men of American indus- 
try. 

We depend on you to produce the 
best possible product at the most rea- 
sonable cost, thus providing: a major 
part of the base for our military 



power. In such production, we would 
expect you to apply the principles of 
human engineering, systems analysis 
and the most modern techniques the 
state of the art will allow, no matter 
what the product or service. While 
a competitive market normally pro- 
motes such practices, we seek a spe- 
cial effort for reasons of economy of 
the taxpayer's dollar, quality and 
utility of the product and reduction 
of lead times. The soldier at the front 
is affected. 

It may sound like a platitude or 
I may sound like a contracting- officer, 
but we really do depend on you to 
meet scheduled production dates and 
quantities. Late deliveries cause us 
problems that extend fa'r beyond the 
technicalities of contract performance 
and cause us problems in our combat 
operations. We have some items that 
are now badly needed in Vietnam 
wherein the contract is over a year 
behind scheduled deliveries, 

We depend on you to develop and 
apply packaging that is most resistant 
to damage-, heat, humidity, shock and, 
in the case of Vietnam, ten thousand 
miles of traveling- followed by pro- 
longed exposure to monsoon weather-, 
dust and the roughest of handling. 

We arc dependent on industry to 
furnish an ever increasing amount of 
supporting- contractual services in 
Vietnam. 




Ration breakdown and storage area at Cam Ranh Bay in South Vietnam. 



Those are some of tin- major .,,.. 
in which those at tlio fur end of tlie 
logistic bridge must rely im U.S. in- 
dustry. It IB military loffisti Unit 
links ihia vast industrial mm-liine to 
our flghlinff forcim. I'nrhaiiH I ... 
any "biitmie.Ha," trinco lliu term ii 
try, to muny people*, eri-ato.s vitn'onH 
of great industrial comploxitti Hid- 
General Motors or U.S. Htcwl. Wi> <!<> 
depend on them, but wo lire jnut w 
deeply indebted to thou.Himdn of 
smaller huttinc-Bara wlio fiirniuli mm- 
[KMicnlg as well an i;nd itciiifi. 

Tho loKlnlic hridpro I've dt-utirihed 
is rnUUtvely l.road and mnooUi nt, thin 
nnd, mo.stly duo to Urn yearn of our 
successful twim oITorl, hut nt tlic fur 
end the ojio in Vloliiamitondi- 
iiniikc it rough. 

I'd like to talk nhout mm of UK.*,, 
(sct.H, MiiHHi they relnUi di- 
rectly with tlio way* in whldi UHI 
Anny dopondH on you, 

Boforo our buildup began, the ]. l)r |, 
of Saloon, crowded and bH.ind Uui 
times ns to mrthodH, WHH inadi'iniiiti 1 
to meet the- dldclnirKe ri>i|iilrcim>nH 
It waa reully th. ( only i.orl in Houlh' 
Violnnm. Tlio ton-fllo, lnei-(AH in Hliin-. 
IMnyr requlrnd tho Uiiltt-d Klal. H to 

buidnownort.v-HixottlHNa. tom.|.- 
Jiort tho now troop strciiKth, Thin wim 

in addition to exlonwlvo oximiiHimi in 
i itself. A trumeiKloiiH ^rni-l, |>y 
oiiflflnuor units, ||m Navy Hca- 
Joo unitH, w w ]| llfl ( . ivi ,| m| C(Hl|i| 
tor Hj both U.S. and alii,-,!, ,],, ttK ^ n , 
Blvo UNO of liKliUM'UKi) unit Iiicrcaidiw 

in jmrt fncilllk-B now luM ( pin K 
with tho mililarv re n ^ m [] 



out 1 in'w jnnirli! luiol mi 
Jt:i imiuiiblc, II. lin.'i a sole 
moulded I'iillirr Mian ulilrhnl In (lit- 
upliri'H. 'I'lii.'i in \vluit I n-tViTcd In 
wlioii I (tnid we depend on ymi lo 
pnividc (M|iilpnii'iit. Unit run nhind u;i 
ID Mil!) tiiirt of wciillici' nnd IciTiiin, 
Toilny'n i-iiniliiil, in Vli'l.uuni ri'ijiiirrsi 

lill'Jfi! loiUUl)> r <'.H i'f linillti:!, lmllrt:i, rn 

tiiin.'i nnd, in all, |>ci'lm|iM ti iiiilllun 
iti'inn. It Mjorn'Kalcn now ovi-i 1 ,'(011,0011 
iihoil ton): 11 nioiilli uf which Muml 
tw(t |U!iToiiL inovn liy air. 

In thn ultininl)', (In- win- tli.-rv In 
iidt oil" of Imm unit /iluliuli.'M, ]>ul 
ntllicr in OIK" (if i'liKii* I'oinluil. The In 
dividual Hohlicr him tin- Imirly IUK! 
Imy.imlmiH lunli uf flmlliiK llu' rhinivi' 
enemy and dt'fi'rUinir him. lie nmr.l 
IICI<|L him out in Ilii- d<-r|i jnnirl'''t nnil 
hidden (.iintii-l i-utiipli-xi-!!. Me ginii>l 
ilt'iitroiy lKt< t'lLi'itiy'ii \vi-[i|n>aii, fuc 
tnrio:i p food and c>iiii|>a)rnt Unit ln- 
flndji thiTc. Hit inniil fur<< un rin<niy 
UiiiL in IlMill i-uitidtili-d liu-Kfly tit 



Kn-rillu iKiumtn, 1ml. | n ,l H y mn ^_ 

' ' ''l'" llll "l!I. One o\ V t 

'"'''"" I|1IV " bnill. up with lhml, l(7ll|l . 

i"K Ilir.-al. la Ilic nnl ()],. ...JH, ' 

. i ... ""man 

cm 1 1 n>l Dial we in -Hi jij )in i ..) . , 

''>' l """ " r ' "'% I'Hi. by tin- Tom'' 

"''" "'"' '""'I'"""!' "f lh.il a.,1,11,.,. , 
ru<v ' ""'">' llll<l 'I'-f'-al liini. Our 

Irl , j:il "';' lir " ll f; 1 ,";,"; " '. w 

""" |lf ll vihl1 ""'i d without it 
In- will h.. li.-l|>li-.-ni. li j,, , )V1 ,,. , (||iyfl 

"HiliMK frnn, II,,, weH r.nu.t. There 
> "1"" IM- Imd tun.. >n th.- |, n , r , lru . 
iiu'iil tunl proilurlliMi phan<-;i \\'t 



nn'.-r, '.|t|iin<M>l ami luniminltlim o 
yrr fcoin MMW ar,- nil di'|i..||,| r ,,t 
wliiit we mr lining l.itluy. 

l ' ll>ll|tllli:i I' ' I'l'ndurlloi, \, m 

htu-li h.-N- can run-... ,-vrn inn. m-i-iuiiii 
I'yl'lHun r..i- (li- i.,.|,|i rr , i( ,]. fr(|]lt 

if Ihry tin tint |n )H |lin tll.< l|iT(ll!(l 



for lw,tt| ntf CftPKW for |)( , 
Purpose. Thte ,,. m ||, ltl , y l { ^ 
often bnconiM c,nil n 



Tho dlmnto in Vlolnnm, you ini-| lt 
V. nma tl,o gamut fwm M 
f 8 not nioniwmn ^ e ^ 
lowlumls, it' fool-,1,0,, I 
hlghlundH. TUB ^i . 

on cK.uip.nont, mnal of w 
to bo oporatwl ncrwiH Uw. who] 

1 oi ' fiijc(>miiti(i '>'^r 

hour-day bneto who,. It 



I'lh'S 8 '""! , 10 " 18 ' ''"S - 

wio tnrcada uacd to atitcli our atiuid 

uZ^^-^^^l-ln 

Wo uro, Uieroforo, AnArmy 




lullpi r lmu! HUm |lM 



ouliKtflt In Hauth Vletnii 
Ortobor 19< 




Lt. Col. James Bain Jr., USA 



Galileo said, "You can't teach a 
man anything; you can only help 
him find it in himself." An objective 
appraisal of your performance can 
help you find, in yourself, a better 
project manager. 

Students from Government and in- 
dustry at the Defense Weapon Sys- 
tems Management Center (DWSMC) 
learn to be better program managers 
by objective evaluation of their de- 
ficiencies. Sincere requests for criti- 
cism from fellow students are usually- 
rewarded by disturbingly frank com- 
ments. Tins leads to improvement. In 
this process, the instructor serves as 
a catalyst to accelerate the free ex- 
change of constructive criticism. 

It seems that most students are de- 
ficient in their balanced emphasis, 
rather than the development, of skills. 

tud ^& 8 selccted to attend 
DWSMC, a DOD-sponsbred school for 
major weapon system program man- 
agement, have already developed the 
skills required. In practice situations 
confronting a program manager, most 
students consistently and unconsci- 
ously over-emphasize certain skills 
and neglect others. A project manager 
who is qualified, but who neglects 
some skills, has the same impact on 
the organization as one who is un- 
qualified. The important difference is 
that one with ability can easily im- 
prove by placing equal emphasis on 
neglected skills. Most students, how- 
ever are unaware of their neglect 
until class discussions help them real- 
ize it. 

Practicing project managers may 
also be deficient in their balanced em- 
phasis of skills, yet be totally unaware 
of it, Most program managers, and 
particularly those with higher educa- 
tion, feel they do a good if not ex- 
cellentjob of managing a project. 
Because people are so easily offended 
ivhen criticized outside of an academic 
Jiivironment, other people hesitate to 
;ell them what they really think of 
;neir managing efforts. This strength- 
ens their illusions. Consequently, some 
n;ogram managers fail to improve 
,vith practice. 

Improvement is possible, but it must 
>egm with objective self-appraisal. A 
>racticing project manager does not 
lave advantage of "academic immun- 
ty," A student can "run the world" as 
fton as necessary to learn from ap- 
>raisal of his mistakes. A practitioner 
an only "run the world" once, and 
isually without the benefit of con- 
tractive criticism. This forces him to 
ind it m himself to improve by objec- 
ive self -appraisal. 

The purpose of this article is to 
ientify the neglected skills of stu- 
ent project managers to help prac- 

>efense Industry Bulletin 



ticing project managers evaluate their 
own performance. 

The approach describes the skills 
that a good project manager empha- 
sizes and a poor project manager 
neglects. The impact of each is com- 
pared, because an organization reflects 
a true image of the project man- 
ager's performance Finally, four ac- 
tion steps to become a better program 
manager are outlined. 
Functions and Skills of a Good 
Project Manager. 

A good project manager performs 
three separate, yet interrelated func- 
tions namely, executive, management 
and leadership. The executive function 
determines objectives, policies and 
programs to produce a weapon sys- 
tem pn time, within cost, and with the 
required reliability and performance. 
Management controls performance, 
schedule and cost to accomplish estab- 
lished programs. Leadership promotes 
essential contributions from individ- 
uals. 

Executive Function and Skills. The 
executive function involves decision 
making to ^regulate the relations 
among desired objectives, available 
means of the organization, and limit- 
ing factors of the situation. Possible 
objectives desired by the decision 
maker arc determined. Courses of ac- 
tion which have some chance of yield- 
ing desired objectives by employing 
available means are also determined. 
Each feasible course of action is then 
analyzed to determine its probable out- 
come in an anticipated, or estimated, 




. U. Col. James Bain Jr., USA, is 
a faculty member of the Defense 
Weapon Systems Management Center, 
Wright-Pa ttorson AFB, Ohio, where 
he teaches project management sub- 
jects in the senior resident course. 
He is a graduate of the Massachusetts 
Institute of Technology and holds a 
master's degree in business admin- 
istration from Syracuse University. 



situation, All factors which can affect 
the outcome, and which are not under 
the decision maker's control, should be 
considered. These steps may result in 
a decision not to decide. 

Emerging from this decision process 
may be an operating policy or pro- 
gram which .must be complete and 
understandable before management 
can begin. A program specifies what 
objectives must be accomplished, in 
what period, and with what or- 
ganizational means. Policy specifies 
the organization structure to carry out 
the programs and the limits of action 
by immediate subordinates. It is 
essential that policies and programs 
be related and compatible. 

The executive function requires the 
ski Is of innovating objectives, policies 
and programs; anticipating all fac- 
tors of the situation; and organizing 
means to be generated and allocated. 
More intuition than knowledge is in- 
volved because of conditions of uncer- 
tainty. Much of the expected value of 
decisions and their probable outcomes 
are only intuitively known by the de- 
cision maker. There is much that is 
not susceptible to either quantitative 
^ti^iW statement. Students at 
DWSMC felt that the executive skills 
of the program manager approximate 
HO percent intuition or arts; and 20 
percent knowledge or science. 

A good project manager jealously 
guards his prerogative to make de- 
cisions which must be interrelated, 
and which will affect' the 'whole. 'He 
alone sees the whole and must decide 
pertinent policies and programs. Even 
his deputy is not permitted to make 
such decisions without express permis- 
sion, He continually adjusts his poli- 
cies and programs to prevent deterio- 
ration with the passage of time. He 
avoids abrupt adjustments based upon 
periodic reviews. He is careful not to 
decide questions others should decide. 
His policies and programs are pri- 
marily designed to answer important 
questions, which permits further re- 
finement by lower levels. Most impor- 
tant, he considers the time lag be- 
tween decision and action. 

Management Function and Skills. 
The management function involves 
problem solving to control the rela- 
tions among the work to be accom- 
plished, the schedule of accomplish- 
ment, the cost resources and the 
budget. Management problems respond 
to measurement, calculation and stand- 
ardized action. They are characterized 
by repetitive solutions and recurring 
situations. A problem exists when- 
ever there 'is inequality among the 
elements of a simple management 
equation. Solving; the problem requires 
changes in the work, cost, schedule, or 
budget to rebalance the management 
equation which is expressed as fol- 
lows: 

Work 

Time Period => 
Cost 



Time Period = 

Budget 

Time Period 



The maimffcmont function rnqum'H 
HKillul programming, riwUiur and 
mdptniK.^on- kmnvh>d,vo Limn in- 
tuition is involved linuuim) of condi- 
tionji of cm-talnty and rink. Tin.- ox- 
[j(!ct(!([ values of work ('(ijit and 
sdHHlul,. L-HH uNimlly he, determined, 
and Urn po.HHihh, outwimn omir with 
known prohahilitu*. The cril.n'in ,'f 



n 

. lrli, m ,urH and (mimlm ,1,-- 

iiff the. ii|>nliitu.iu, of LI, ...... 

romim tlm hulk of ^inUrm 

)W?Mr n /'". V r 't! !t """''Wnn-n ! 
DWSMC Hlmtonlfl fn t Unit Ih > man- 
awjncnt HkilH approximate HO e - 
emit kiiowhutytt ,r Hdmiwn; and HO 
Dnrrant mluHion or art. 

ImSlfT? 1 '! ra , lllftm (WllvIn il1 l ' x " 

lOllHlvdy delimited l() m-inmlwillurill] 

lvl hy moniiH of ,,,1 int.,'- (, ' 
^ = i^Un,H>^oUn -H! or f 
ynlnm. Proffrmnm UK m-,, ( ,lvflv 
'livid.* and 



,, 

l).v UMiiifr inhiKion Iliiui Itnnwlfdi'.i'. 
Umpalhy willi iiidividuiiln i,<; tln> nmsl 
Hiict, a li'ad.'r can haw, i.e., 
to Ihcir n'!i|io]i:n- to him, 
lndculM IVlt Ihal lh< Innli-r- 
.'ihiji ^ifill!! (if |!ir (irojcct inamiKi'r a|i 
in'ii.xiinatt! K() (itMTt'iit inhiiliuii or nrl ; 
Hint l!0 pcrnitll. l!lli)\v!nl)',r or iicii'iirc. 
Hiilann'd Km|himiH. Why do .tntin< 
I'l'oji'cl, niaiiaKt'i 1 .'! iii'liicvi* mil infarl inn 

lUI^ lll'('(in|ll!ihniclil, wlltlc nll|iT:i 
fail? The uiKivvcr llr;i In on<> nuii-ic, 
inyttlcriiniH ahilily lialaiir,.,! 
"I", lliiliinri'il nn]>hmii;i on lh<> 



viiliv.. and l,.;nli'ntliin ski 



limn. 0,.,. shonldno 




Ni.|{| ( .4-lnl l*:x m ulv,. SMIlM. A no 
.>-.f''' "iiitiniKi-r n.r.l.-.-ls ||,,, ' 
ivr N|,I I; ,,l nm<,v,i(|,,K and ant, 
ml'MK. nrn-m-h, h, U,,. pn,,,,,! 



| ' 1 




;; ' : 

ly, imm .I.U,.,, t | , , 

lmami "' (!OHl ' !i(ll "' ( l"'<' "'id 
rr"' 



, 

fnnrlioini ami {iltilln in ltn> 
. of iitii'cii|t:i. 

i'in|ilm:tm iv:ml(;i in ilu< 
[iHKil, I'lTi'i'llvi-iii'!!!! for (h<> I. -mil .D'ori 
y Hie- pn.jn'l, ninnai;.'!'. Odd n;i il 
"iy "I'i'iri, n K'U'd prn|t-rl iimtuifi'i- 
'"''''I- 1 ' mily avi'nir.i- nhilliv in nil m-r. 
; i iiry ftinclioii!! nnd ittdlln, If h.. nut 

' 



,, i 

tuinly Ih.- .-lnlM.nit.- .-hn mil -|. ( of V 
rdtualinn mid d.viMJnn llm,ii,,|, w |, L 
,!; 1 ""'-' ! ""': 1 l'-Mi,ir,,| for 
Ml<i ':"! ilium,., nn.wlli of n 
' "' ;l . "' ''"Hi,.-i/ t - ;unl minil | 
IIIH.I.TII MfKJiiii/iiitHM'i rniiilhi in din 
ii-h l:t I-XI.IV|H 



'".'I 1 ,""""' 
l "" l ' 1 " 1 "' ...... "',. 

Hi. "'"I! itloil \immm. Mi. ralnli. 



ss^'j^ai 

='-, tj^ J"S-S,o"i 



_ - "! -'iiitin uj n \ nor 

I n>Ji'rl ManiiKt'i 1 , 

A poor (iniji'fl maiiii|>,t<r iivi<ivni|i|ia" 
"IW'ii niiifiiif(fiiii>nt and m'fMi-.'lji HH< 
'|'j"iiMy ininortiud cxmtlivc and Imd 
j 1 ;. up ^,'iliil hi. || ( . ] llni (,,[ ]|j ;i i, ,,],(,.,, 
['.\ lierioimly nuiilndnlnir Ihe ivlnlivi- 
'if nninareinriii, whii-h in 
and jlfHiTiliol hy a \vrahh ..!' 
. . '' I he execltljvc mid h-mlr-r 
"nip hineliini!! rannol he m ca^Hv ih-. 
ij 1 ' 1 ' 11 "' 11 '""I HUli' liternhire e;i,,(, 
uL 1 ]"' 1 ' '""-'.'lly Inhiilive in iiuhn,'. ' 
Unii,. (in- i| M . ].,,(,,. ,- ( jniii|es;ltv (if 
1( M''' win- 1 dnnandn h.-lter mnnmt,- 

riNiiir i inLii 1. 1. .. , t. i " 

nliin iiiTi-i'i {iiic'i 



'MHI-, l ]n..,-rl nmim,;r':i 
I" innnMitr :in.| iililiri|ifih< 

'" '""''''' '" iii'-'iU'v hniiiM-ii h'y' re- 

;'' ' lll : I" ivii-iunlnK whirl, ,(',,,.,, 

i!H .-iiiil itinl ti|i|ifn|,i tn niii-i'iitlimt 
'dull m:.'ii.;n-.'.. Thin j ; , nn rxlraonllii. 
", iy f|1|l( "' |"'l'--i"'in4ilpi whirl, would 
"itiu t :.-r n.d ,-i-nli ihr brut of m o n 



IMPACT OF EXECUTIVE EMPHASIS UPON THE ORGANIZATION 



roou 

I'HOJKCT MANAiWK 



COOl) 
UKCT MANA(;i-!H 



01UKCTIVKH, I'OI.K'Y & IM.ANH 
,!';' ' nS'"!. 11 ',, ji^ll.- ,! hp. ...... - 

'" IV " I " 



OldiANI/ATION OltliKH 
'' Aril,,,, 



.! 



11 .. '" "nii j\ Nt 'I 1 * OI* I*|'H)PI 

' wife a,!;;;*"" ?.*?.'* 

Silft'^-- K "' 1 """* 11 "" 



AvulttihlK for 



1'or 
' 



Tin, 



M t - vt * r Ttw >' T " 

tlt<M ''""^ tlllfl TlmmholilH To 
Ko Wfi H m ,t[i l)rr[nton Hy Or- 



October 1966 



project manager can choose to inno- 
vate or anticipate, and accept the 
consequences of his initiative, i.e., per- 
suading; the ^specialized staff. 

Some project managers choose to 
follow the first course because it is 
easier and avoids "making; waves." 
They have not developed a talent for 
persuasion on the scale required. They 
prefer to accept the risk of not in- 
novating; or anticipating rather than 
the risk of failing to persuade higher 
levels. Included in this group are some 
project managers who have been worn 
down by frustration. 

Other project managers follow the 
second course of action and accept the 
penalty for innovating or anticipating, 
They have a talent for persuasion but 
must spend considerable time and ef- 
fort in its accomplishment. Persuasion 
results at best in delay and at worst 
in disapproval. They are willing to 
pay this price to insure that their ob- 
jective, policies and programs are as 
realistic as possible under the circum- 
stances. 

The impact of neglecting executive 
sit ills is the same whether caused by 
the project manager or the conditions 
imposed upon him. Neglecting to an- 
ticipate and innovate results in set- 
ting unrealistic objectives, policies 
and programs. People can never be- 
lieve in, nor achieve, unrealistic objec- 
tives. 

_ Without realistic objectives, there 
is no unity of organized effort. People 
cither do what they think they should, 



or do nothing. Without a unifying 
purpose, people naturally align their 
actions to satisfy their own interests 
and motives. 

Figure 1 summarizes the impact of 
executive emphasis upon the organi- 
zation. 

Overemphasized Management Skills. 

A poor project manager overempha- 
sizes his role in the management func- 
tion by doing or approving problem 
solving delegated to subordinate levels. 
He does his subordinates' problem 
solving in the work he knows. He 
holds confirming reviews to approve 
his subordinates' solutions in the work 
he does not know, Again, his emphasis 
is upon skills requiring more knowl- 
edge than intuition, 

This overemphasis is caused by the 
poor project manager being over- 
interested in work he knows, and over- 
cautious about work he does not know. 
But when he gets to the problem solv- 
ing of lower levels, he usurps the re- 
sponsibility and authority which he 
has delegated. 

Probably the most vivid description 
of what happens to the organization 
as a result of these two management 
failings is "the poor project manager 
is very busy moving around the furn- 
iture in his house while the house is 
on fire." He gets so busy, he lets his 
own management function go and he 
can never find the time to perform 
executive and leadership functions. 

There is another sure indication of 
these failings. Two separate manage- 



IMPACT OF MANAGEMENT EMPHASIS UPON THE ORGANIZATION 



POOR 
PROJECT MANAGER 



GOOD 
PROJECT MANAGER 



MANAGEMENT PROBLEM SOLVING 

Does Subordinate Problem Solv- Does His Own Problem Solving 
in gin Work He Knows At Level For Which He is Re- 

nt .. r, , sponsible 

Approves" Subordinates Problem Delegates Problem- Solving Re- 
solutions In Work He Does Not sponsibility Within His Organiza- 
Jinow tfon 

ORGANIZATION ORDER 

Usurps Responsibility And Au- Maintains Delegated Responsibility 
thonty Delegated To Subordinates And Authority of Subordinates 

Maintains Two ( Separate Manage- Maintains A Single Integrated 
ment Information Systems One Management System For His Or- 
Iirformal System For Himself ganization And He Uses It 
Another Eyewash System To Im- 
press His Superiors 

Continuous Slippages And Over- Occasional Slippages And Over- 
runs runs 

PERFORMANCE OF PEOPLE 

Reduction In Sense Of Responsi- Willing Acceptance Of Responsi- 
bility, bility 
Indecisive And Frustrated Decisive and Satisfied 

PERFORMANCE OF PROJECT MANAGER 

Indispensable Key People Can Carry On 

Always Too Busy In Meetings Never Too Busy To Meet 

Over-Cautious In Work He Confident Of People In Work He 

Doesn't Know Doesn't Know 

Over-Interested In Work He Patient With People In Work He 

Knows Knows 



Figure 2. 



ment information systems are created 
one for the poor project manager 
himself and an "eyewash" system for 
his _ organization. Because the poor 
project manager attempts to solve and 
approve a!l problems himself, he nec- 
essarily needs a great deal of infor- 
mation. He usually obtains this in- 
formation by an informal system of 
reporting and hy extensive traveling 
to "get the facts." 

Another serious impact upon the 
organization is indecisiveness and a 
diminution of a general sense of re- 
sponsibility in his people. This stems 
from an apparent lack of confidence 
in _ their problem solving. Because of 
this lack of confidence, people redel- 
gate their responsibility and author- 
ity back to the project manager. 

Figure 2 summarizes the impact of 
the management emphasis upon the 
organization. 

Neglected Leadership Skills. A poor 
project manager gets caught in the 
trap of attempting to manage rather 
than lead people. He fails to com- 
municate and motivate. He becomes 
more authoritative than communica- 
tive, and he relies more on material 
incentives than moral persuasion. 

Neglect of these skills in practice 
is caused by assuming people are not 
willing to contribute. This assumption 
leads him to blame people. He, then, 
attempts to use his authority by de- 
manding their participation. Material 
incentives are used to regard those 
willing to conform and those who are 
unwilling are punished. 

A poor project manager is unaware 
that his communication skills are to 
blame rather than his people. His 
people simply do not understand what 
he wants. He writes and talks, but 
seldom informs. He hears, but seldom 
listens. He sees, but seldom has time 
to read. lie consistently under-esti- 
mates the intelligence and over- 
estimates the information of his 
people. They, in turn, consistently 
over-estimate his intelligence and 
under-estimatc his information. He 
pays little attention to improving oral 
communications in the organization 
such as daily staff meetings, telephone 
contacts, conferences, briefings, etc. 

His usual habit of blaming people 
severely limits his skill in moral per- 
suasion. People do not believe his re- 
form measures are important and 
they are not motivated to succeed. His 
negative attitudes are apparent to all. 
He is cynical, critical, impatient, and 
sees mostly the bad side of people. His 
attitudes reflect his feeling that his 
people will fail, and they do. 

The impact of these neglected skills 
upon the organization is deliberate 
withholding of information. His fail- 
ure to communicate and motivate re- 
sults in frustration among his staff. 
Subconsciously, people will defend 
against frustration by withholding 
some of what they contribute, i.e., in- 
formation. The project manager has 
no way of measuring the loss of an 
idea that could have been contributed ; 
however, he senses that it is happen- 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



t oi-II 

T ml 






P , I 
ho I 
' 




i i 



' ''''' ( 'i"i>MU; and nifurni into (lie 1'iiliire In (alii- iiilu uccutin 

roi'il! ? i 1>t ' l ' t ' 1 ' "f t'"' ''''*>'. tin 1 delay,'! Id oldiiin approval and in, 

iiif ii' V l ; a 1 " Hfl '" UH 'y with- idemeiil (In- decision, I'l-i-pum- a til ah- 

(o "".'y 011 ' 'I'liiiJ^ ilm'doii mi nittnl, nf objective:! wliicb are projerh'i 

.....'" . ^"'lioiiwbility ami, it I. li'iisl live \var;i in In (lie hi hi, < 



' -- '" ("*n P, J t\ l |.||- 

* ' nl, li'iisl live yi-ar/i inlu (In 

Hpcril'y Imw I'e/iiniree n<(|lli|-rfin>i)< r; 
for olijeclivi'.'i \\'ill he |;i.|ier/itr-d and 
allocated. I'i'e]iare a cuiiipal ililc idah- 
llienl. of dpei'Jtl ill)'. IHilieiV:; \vliich v, ill 
!lli:i\Vef Hie inipni laul i|i|e:>| jnn:i In ln i 
allied, [deidirv wlio in (lie m j',:ini/a 
(inn litnietiire will rri-niiiriH-nil, d<-ridr- 

contri)! Nyslen, ilial wit! he used in 
Hie (il'|-,a)|i/i,tii)|i. (let Inf.elliiT uilli 
you i' iniuiedialc suhi.rdinnl':i and l.-t 
Hieni |)arlici|>ale i,, !:e||ln|.. itih-i ,-, 
lated (iliji-elivi'.'t itiul piilii-y. AJ k (li.-ni 
lo li'll you how yiit, em, |i..|]i iiif.tilalo 
(lieni jg'oin liarannnient frmn iiij'linr 
ailllioi'ity it, :nr<>iii|>li:Jjinc. llx'ii' ot< 

.JI'I'tlVI'M, Tlllir' licllllll In iH'eirolile (lli;l 

Siilvc Yunr Ouu ManiiKrnii'iil I'loli. 

Si)l\'iil)v iinly llio<;i. pi'oltlrinn \vlili 'i, iir<. 
reCi'i-red In ymi by your imnii-diafr ^id> 
'irdinalen. Dn tn,| ihmrp deli'i^M.'d i.- 

and luipnivlnj' Ilieir |iutilrni ^nltinr.] 
l.cl Iliein iiiilvc Ilieir MUM iiinlil.'H,^ 
and espri'i (In. in |o null,,, -..n,,- n ,i ;i 
lakca in dniii|( it. Inujfit ii|m,i n \,,,,\, 
li'in mialviiiii t'ni' all t'M'i'pii.iiui, Miun 



<'nniiiiuiil.-a(r and M.ilJviK,. Th, 

'^^^^^n, mi >t' 
livjilii- ..... ...... [ 

'V'j' 



'!" I'l'KJT/t'unl. lliniUMliMii 
iirj',iini'/alloti. lln MIIV ynii n,.,. it. 't'uK.r 
uir time hi teiieli your |N-I>|I|>' |[ M \v |.i 
Umi Hie inaiiii(;''lil''n! r.|ii!,t Ion. IIH 

I' iiniiii^.'ionit' id' Hi.- newer i|iianiil;ifiv.- 

' ti'Cliniinieii, ititrli an cu;it I'HVrlivi-ui 1 , 1 :;! 



M " |ll " t " i '' T1 "' 




OF LEADERSHIP EMPHASIS UPON THE ORGANIZATION 



'UO.IKCT MANACMH 



lufnnimllnn Ci.iltlil.lllrd 

()Kt)KK 

,. 







Now Amphibious 

Assault Ship 

To Carry Holos 



A nx 
"'V' 1 ' "hiii. .I. 




ft,,, |,HA, Dint 

. ,,f jiiilli || M ||. 

oitdiiiK 1'Hif'l in nhifjlo 

.' t..-iti}f |.|ill(lli'd 111' tilt) 



tlm 



(II* Dinv 

HI.-I.-III. id,- NVvy'ii nin- 
i j ii|iiiMIUy l.y (tcnnit- 
.ti: t ,f itu'iii*! 1 Mitriiio 

<: .|l II i;||l>.;!t' },||j)|, 

C.,i mulaHi'M and I'tmtract 
,)! \vtll In nuiJKil nut hy Dm 
,V(t-. y tn nl.lJiiii i-i.utjil'-l" n*ni|'lltivo 
t!''-.-init MM't f.iU'ill 



Hr, f ;ui stjti'i -ill* (tlf'.nn ttiut perform- 
ftu"' (i-'julii-itttMii^ will )H> jinivhlril to 

111" t.iiifl.itl |.it|i|<T(l wllil Will )lltl)lllit 
I'l.i)tfMil;| t.i( (]i,. fi.MIJllctr (IHHIl 
HIM! ilmiY4i-!i>i'MI''M i.f IIii' iiltlp. Till! 
P'llllfiil will t*i JtWttl'ili'il Illi lll'i 

i-f Out i|iiIUy <f Hi.- liwlKii 

It'll* itiitl f.<i!i| |fft< uycli* nmlw. -*n 

A ('""ji'i't hutitttMi-mpfit oillcCi 
li' j H!'-) |,y ('Hiiifljn Frmik J. Hoh, 
I'NM, jiwn iM'i'n fnuMfiM In Uw 
KttvHl Ship Nyot<-hi C<tummrul for the 



October 1966 



by 
Capt. J. L. Colcman, USN 



The acronym COIN has become the 
accepted name for an airplane de- 
signed expressly for the general field 
of counterinsurgency operations. The 
OV-10A (COIN) aircraft is being de- 
veloped by the Navy as a tri-Service 
program to obtain a true counter- 
insurgency weapon system. In some 
circles it has been referred to as the 
"guerrilla warplane." 

Work toward a COIN aircraft can 
be traced back to 1961 when a Navy 
design competition was held for an 
observation-liaison helicopter to com- 
bine the observation tasks of light air- 
planes with the rescue and utility 
tasks of helicopters. 

Series of Developments. 

The Navy contracted for the devel- 
opment of the OV-1 Grumman Mo- 
hawk in 1957 to fulfill Army and Ma- 
rine Corps requirements. Financial 
considerations caused the Marines to 
abandon the OV-1, although the need 
for a weapon system to fill the void 
between the helicopter and the attack 
close air support bomber still existed. 
Later, the OV-1 was transformed into 
a sophisticated observation/surveil- 
lance vehicle for the Army. 

In mid-1961 the Navy was asked to 
review the feasibility of developing 
an extremely small, light, simple and 
Inexpensive airplane intended to oper- 
ate in a battlefield environment at the 
battalion or regimental level. Called 
the L'VMA for Light Marine Attack, 
it was to be immediately available for 
use by the ground commander in an 
armed attack role as well as for ob- 
servation. The L'VMA became the 
foundation from which the present 
counterinsurgency type aircraft con- 
cept emerged. 

The concept of the COIN aircraft 
continued under study and in the fall 
of 1962, the Director, Defense Re- 
search and Engineering (DDR&E), 
added the limited transportation of 
personnel and cargo to the required 
missions. The use of this airplane, as 
seen by DDR&E at the time, was to 
replace a large inventory of obsoles- 
cent planes being- used by the United 
States and throughout the world by 
bhe Military Assistance Program 
sountries. 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



Navy Named Development Agency. 

' In mid-1903 military interest in the 
COIN concept became a reality with 
the Navy being assigned develop- 
mental responsibility and the estab- 
lishment of a steering committee 
under tho chairmanship of the As- 
sistant Secretary of the Navy for 
Research and Development. The mem- 
bership of the steering committee in- 
cluded the Assistant Secretaries for 
Research and Development of tho 
three Services, representatives of 
DDR&E and the Advanced Research 
Project Agency (ARPA), and the 
Deputy Chief of Staff (Air), U. S. 
Marine Corps. A working level com- 
mittee made up of alternates for each 
member provided day-to-day continu- 
ity. By virtue of the steering commit- 
tee participation, the specifications 
developed by this group for the de- 
sign competition, in effect, had tri- 
Service approval. 

The Bureau of Naval Weapons 
(now Naval Air Systems Command) , 
which was assigned development and 
contractual responsibility, issued pre- 
liminary specifications to industry for 
a LARA (Light Armed Reconnais- 
sance Airplane) in December 1&63. 

Proposals were received in March 




Capt. Joseph L. Coleman, USN, has 
served as project manager for the 
Navy's COIN project since September 
1964. Capt. Coleman ia a designated 
Navy aviator and has a wide back- 
ground of service in the Navy's air 
arm. He has attended the Armed 
Forces Staff College and the Naval 
War College. 



1964 from 11 firms. The Navy 
conducted its normal evaluation of 
these proposals and, after approval of 
the steering committee, awarded n 
contract to the North American Avia- 
tion CoJumhus, Ohio, Division to de- 
sign, build and flight test seven pro- 
totype aircraft on a. firm fixed prico 
basis. The contract also contained 
options for the purchase of varying 
lots of aircraft up to a maximum of 
600 on a fixed price ceilmj? arrange- 
ment. 

Variety of Missions. 

The OV-10A is designed to perform 
a variety of military mission**, includ- 
ing observation and armed ri-coniwiH- 
sance, forward air control of attack 
aircraft, helicopter escort, limited 
ground attack, target mnrlciritf, tfim- 
fire spotting, liaison find utility. It 
could also be adapted, if dtmirt'd, U> 
perform such peacetime fiincLiniiH UB 
security patrol, disaster relief, im-Uk-al 
missions, riot control, aerial mapping 
and spraying:. 

The aircraft is to bo ciipiibln of 
.operating from rough iiiiprupiiroil 
fields, in addition to prepared air- 
fields and aircraft cai'riors. Although 
floats are not procured for Uio 
seven prototype aircraft, amphibiouu 
float capability for operation on 
waterways can bo provided in produc- 
tion aircraft. 

A high degree of reliability, rujf- 
gedness, simplicity of oporntion inul 
low cost was emphasized in the de- 
sign, of the aircraft combined with 
the requirements for wea-pmiH deliv- 
ery, reconnaissance nnd ttffht Irima- 
port, 

Tihe North American concept fea- 
tures twin turbo-prop cnffinofl and 
twin booms with tho horix<mtnl lull 
mounted high between twin vertical 
tails. The fuselage is mountcid mulor 
the wing nnd tho pilot and obuorvor 
are seated in tandem ahead of Ihu 
propellers with virtually unobBtr-ucluU 
visibility. 

A 74-eubic-foot cargo compnrtmrmt 
in the fuselage has a capacity for 
carrying either cargo or povBormol. 
Access to the cargo bay in gained 
through a hinged door at the rear of 
the fuselage. This nceesa ponnlUt 
waist-level loading of cai' K o or per- 
sonnel. The rear scat and flight con- 
trols can be removed, thereby IncroRB- 
mg the cargo capacity to 111 cu hic 
feet, 

The cargo compartment with tho 
rear seat removed can accommodate 



more than 3,200 pounds of cargo, five 
paratroopers with full equipment, six 
combat-equipped infantrymen, or two 
litter patients with a medical attend- 
ant. 

_ The high tail assembly design pro- 
vides for direct transfer of cargo from 
trucks which can be backed up to the 
loading door, and also permits para- 
dropping of cargo or paratroopers, 

External stores can be carried on 
five store stations. Three stations are 
located on the fuselage; the remaining 
two stations are on removable spon- 
sons mounted on the fuselage. The 
sponsons also contain four fixed 7.62 
mm M60 machine guns. 

For a typical attack mission, the 
OV-10A can be armed with up to 
2.400 pounds of external stores, in- 
cluding; assorted bombs, napalm and 
rocket clusters, and machine guns. 
Mvo wing-tip missile stations are also 
provided. 

Guns and armor protection provide 
the aircraft with its close support and 
nelicopter-escort missions capability. 

Designed to "live with the troops," 
the OV-10A is equipped with large 
tires and an extremely ragged tri- 
cycle landing gear which will enable 
* aircraft to operate from unim- 
P^oved fields in primitive areas. The 
aircraft can be converted for amphibi- 
ous operations by substituting twin 
"oats containing built-in retractable 
wheels, m i ieu of the Meyds ^^ 

Manag ement Plan. 

On July 20, 1965, the OV-10A 
Weapon, System Project was estab- 
H tfc" 8 i desienated P^Ject within 

with ft* 1 Urea " f Naval Weapon* 
refill res Ponsibility to develop and 

wtam to meet the "quire- 



Assistance Program. 

he OV-10A is 



within the Nayal Ajr 

d atructure This * 
the d toted project 

is Staffed with Deputy 
managers from the Marine 

m and Air Porce - 

ia assisted * 

for technical - 
,.,, *"* procurement 

m the Air Syste 

Project 



agement team. They report in the ver- 
tical structure to their division head 
and the project manager. Changes af- 
fecting detail specificaton or cost are 
processed by the team through their 
cognizant areas and presented to the 
Intra-Bureau Change Committee for 
approval. 

The management plan for the 0V- 
10A includes the Navy PROMPT 
(Program Reporting, Organization 
and Management Planning Tech- 
nique) management tool and is used 
by North American Aviation as pro- 
vided for in the basic contract. 
PROMPT provides uniform informa- 
tion reporting procedure and methods 
for systematically and periodically 
comparing actual performance against 
approved plans and schedules. The 
PROMPT reports are prepared in a 
prescribed format for insertion into 
a Program Profile Manual, thereby 
providing the current status for the 
project manager and contributing to 
the overall continuity and manage- 
ment of the weapon system. Once the 
program profile manual is established, 
the general policy of PROMPT is 
"reporting by exception." 

A companion system for use by all 
elements of the Air Systems Command 



is the Project Master Plan which pro- 
vides the basis for the control, direc- 
tion, coordination and evaluation of 
a project throughout all phnsai of a 
project life cycle. The program profile 
manual provided by the PROMPT 
system contributes to the mnkc-np of 
the project master plan and in sup- 
plemented by the project teiiin nmJ 
other divisions of the Air Syatoina 
Command. 

The principle management U-ch- 
niquo employed is Time Buse Sched- 
ule consisting of milestones in nJI 
ureas of accomplishment. 

Present Status. 

On July 7, 1905, an advanced teat 
vehicle OV-10A aircraft was rolled 
out at North American Aviation's 
Columbus Division three months 
ahead of schedule. Five prototype 
aircraft arc now Hying. Three of 
these aircraft wore used for Urn Navy 
Preliminary Evaluation complntod in 
March 1906 by Service pilots. Upon 
completion of additional conlrnctoi- 
demonstrations and development twit- 
ing, a final Navy Preliminary Evalu- 
ation will bo held. Subsequently, Din 
aircraft will bo subjected to trials by 

(Continued on Pitjjc 17) 




October 1966 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 



Maj. Gen. Abe J. Beck, USAF, has 
been assigned to duty as senior Air 
Force Member, Military Studies and 
Liaison Div., Weapon Systems Eval- 
uation Group, Office of the Dir., 
Defense Research & Engineering-. 

Maj. Gen. Dwight O. Monteith, 
USAF, has been designated as Proj- 
ect Manager for Project Cloud Gap. 
RAdm. James A. Dare, USN, has 
been appointed Dep. Dir, for Opera- 
tions & Administration, Defense 
Atomic Support Agency, replacing 
Brig. Gen. Kenneth F. Dawalt, USA, 
who has been reassigned as Dep. Chief 
of Research & Development for Inter- 

, national Programs, U.S. Army. Adm. 

3 Dai-e was Commander, Naval Ord- 
nance Laboratory, White Oak, Md. 
before being assigned to DASA. 

Brig. Gen. Thomas S. Jeffrey Jr., 
USAF, has been assigned as Staff Di- 
rector for Aircraft, Office of Asst. 
Secretary of Defense (Installations & 
Logistics). 

Paul C. Warlike, formerly a partner 
in the Washington law firm of Cov- 
ington and Burling, has been sworn 
in as General Counsel for the Defense 
Department. 

Capt. J. N. Horrocks, Jr., USN, has 
been assigned as Special Asst. to the 
Dep. Asst. Secretary of Defense 

(Public Affairs), replacing Capt. 

1 Lloyd Young, USN. 

The new pep. Dir., (Scientific), De- 
fense Atomic Support Agency is Dr. 
N. Frederick Wilmer. He succeeded 
Dr. Theodore B. Taylor, who has held 
the position since October 1964. 

Col. Amos A. Jordan, USA, has 
been designated Dir., Near East, 
South Asia and Africa Region, Office 
of Asst. Secretary of Defense (Intel-- 
national Security Affairs). 

Capt. Francis B. Grubb, USN, has 
been appointed Comptroller and Dir. 
of Programs for the Military Traffic 
Management & Terminal Service. 

Col. William D. Kyle Jr., USAF, 
has been reassigned as Commander, 
Subsistence Regional Headquarters, 
Chicago, 111., Defense Supply Agency. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Col. Eduardo M. Soler has been 
named Project Manager of the newly 
established utility tactical aircraft 
system at the Army Aviation Materiel 
Command, St. Louis, Mo. 

Col. Ivey O. Drewry Jr., Project 
Manager for the Army's Nike-X mis- 
sile defense project at Redstone Ar- 
senal, Ala., has been promoted to the 
rank of brigadier general. 

Kenneth M. Barnett, who had a 
^ major role in organizing the nation- 
wide tornado forecasting service oper- 
ated by the U.S. Weather Bureau, has 
been appointed as Dep. Dir., of the 
Army Electronics Command's Atmos- 
pheric Sciences Laboratory. 




The new acting chief of the Small 
Business Office of the Army Mobility 
Equipment Command, St. Louis, Mo., 
is Valda N. Cordell. Mr. Cordell re- 
places Ben Kaylor, who has retired 
from Federal service. 

Robert C. Trick, formerly with the 
Air Force Systems Command, has 
been named Value Engineering- Co- 
ordinator for the Army's Strategic 
Communications Command in "Wash- 
ing-ton, B.C. 

Henry C. C. Weinkauff is retiring 
from his position as Chief, Planning 
Div., Civil Works, Office of the Army 
Chief of Engineers, Washington, D.C. 

The following assignments have 
been made at the U. S. Array Labora- 
tories, Natick, Mass.: Col. James G. 
Bennett as Chief, Airdrop Equipment 
Div.; and Col. William B. Levin as 
Chief, Technical Plans Office. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

VAclm. Thomas F. Connolly has 
been assigned as Dep. Chief of Naval 
Operations (Air) from duty as Com- 
mander, Naval Air Force, Pacific. 

RAdm. Robert L. Townsend became 
Commander, Naval Air Systems Com- 
mand, relieving RAdm. Allen M. 
Shinn. Adm. Shinn has been ordered 
to duty as Commander, Naval Air 
Forces, Pacific, with the rank of vice 
admiral. 

Capt, Sam E. Edclstem Jr., has as- 
sumed duties as Dir., Naval Elec- 
tronics Systems Command, Western 
Div., at San Francisco Bay Navy 
Shipyard. 

Capt. Roger G. Ireland, MC, became 
the Dir., Aerospace Crew Equipment 
Laboratory, Naval Air Engineering 
Center, Philadelphia, Pa., Sept. 1. He 
succeeds Capt. Henry G. Wagner who 
has retired from the Navy. 

Capt. D. R. McComish has assumed 
command of the Naval Supply Depot 
at U.S. Fleet Activities, Yokosuka, 
Japan. Capt. McComish relieved Capt. 
E. R. Joshua Jr., who has been re- 
assigned to duty with the Naval Sup- 
ply System Command headquarters 
in Washington, D.C. 

Capt. William M. Nicholson has 
been assigned as- Dir., Deep Submerg- 
ence Systems Project Office, in Wash- 
ington, D.C. 

Cdr. Frank W. Smith Jr., SC, Is the 
new Officer-in- Charge of the Navy 
Production Equipment Control Office, 
Naval Air Engineering Command, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Gen, James Ferguson, Commander, 
Air Force Systems Command, has 
been assigned additional duty as Dir., 
Manned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL) 
Program. 

Maj. Gen. Frederic H. Miller, Com- 
mander of the Middletown Air Ma- 
teriel Area, Olmsted AFB, Pa., since 
1962, has retired from the Air Force 
after more than 30 years service. On 
Oct. 3, Gen. Miller began a new 
career with the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration as Dep. Dir. 
of Administration and Chief of the 
Resources Management Office at Cape 
Kennedy, Fla. 

Dr. Robert H. Cannon Jr., Profes- 
sor of Aeronautics and Astronautics 
at Stanford University has been 
named to succeed Dr. Robert G. 
Loewy as Chief Scientist of the Air 
Force. 

Col. Gcrrit D. Fremomv has been 
reassigned from duty with the Stra- 
tegic Air Command to Vietnam where 
he will serve as Chief Engineer, Base 
Development Div., MACV, Saigon. 

New assignments in the Air Force 
Systems Command (AFSC) are: 

Col. Ross L. Blachly, Dep. for Test 
Operations, Air Proving Ground Cen- 
ter; Col. William G. King, Comman- 
der, Air Force Satellite Control Facil- 
ity, Space Systems Div.; Col. Roger 
H. Terzian, Dir., Research & Develop- 
ment Procurement, Systems Engineer- 
ing Group, Research & Technology 
Div,; Col. Paul H. Kenney, Dir., AFSC 
Resources Planning, Hq., AFSC; Col. 
James R. Push Jr., Dep. Dir. for Pro- 
curement, Aeronautical Systems Div.; 
Col. Arthur D. Thomas, Asst. Dep. for 
Reconnaissance, Aeronautical Systems 
Div,; Col. Roy D. Ragsdale, Dep. for 
Command Systems, Electronic Sys- 
tems Div.; Col. Raymond A. Gilbert, 
Vice Commander, Research & Tech- 
nology Div.; Col. James H. Webb, Dir., 
Gemini Support, Hq., AFSC; Col. 
Robert P. Daly, System Program Dir. 
of newly formed F-X Advanced Tac- 
tical Fighter System Program Office: 
Col. Otis R. Hill, Dir. of Aero- 
space Instrumentation, Electronic 
Systems Div.; Col. Edwin V. Brown, 
Vice Commander, Arnold Engineering 
Development Center; Col. James 0. 
Cobb, Dep. for Engineering 1 and Tech- 
nology, Ballistic Systems Div.; Col. 
Reynold A. Soukup, Dep. for Tech- 
nical Support, Air Proving Ground 
Center; and Col. C. B. Werner, Acting 
Dep. for Test and Engineering, Air 
Force Special Weapons Center, 

New assignments in the Air Force 
Logistics Command are: 

Col. Buddy R. Daughtrey, nomin- 
ated for promotion to brigadier gen- 
eral, Dep. Commander, Ogden Air 
Materiel Area, and Col. James T. Bull, 
Dir. of Information, Ogden Air Ma- 
terial Area. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 




by 
U, Col. Jacob B, Pompan, USAP 



In the past several years a wide 
'ange of policies, procedures and tech- 
niques has been introduced into the 
Government contracting arena. Each 
of these innovations was designed in 
some respect to help achieve a better 
ontrnct and to obtain a product or 
a service more efficiently 



While each of t hcse ilmoTationa 
m ,ls own r lg ht_ may 

' 
can't mate 






t 

that they were not 
random fa shion , a 
that there . meaningM 

Th. p urpo3e , th . s 



is 



con- 



help 



of , 

the 



"-tag each day 
what we are 



we 



With 
an discusa 



with the contractor are based upon 
the premise that, first, the contractor 
is attempting to maximize his profit 
both in the manner in which he man- 
ages the contracts which he has and in 
strengthening his position to obtain 
additional Government contracts. Sec- 
ondly, while he is maximizing: his 
profit, he is also decreasing the over- 
all cost of that contract to the Gov- 
ernment, 

Now whether we achieve tihis ob- 
jective or not in any single contract 
depends to a very large extent if not 
totally upon the pricing arrange- 
ment of the contract. If we have a 
firm fixed pi-ice (FFP) contract re- 
sulting from real price competition, 
the contractor has the highest cost 
risk and, consequently, there really 
should be cost reduction. If we have 
a sole source cost plus fixed fee 
(CPFF) arrangement with its mini- 
mal cost' risk on the part of the con- 
tractor, the cost reduction motivation 
from the profit motive is likely to bo 
weak. Between competitive FFP and 
CPFF, the spectrum has an infinite 
number of contract pricing- arrange- 
ments, each of which may have a dif- 
ferent impact on the contractor's 



risk and his cost reduction motivatfo 
Therefore, it seems to follow tlu 
our objective, COST EEDUCTIO. 
THROUGH THE PROFIT MOTIV1 
is directly connected and, in fact, di 
pendent upon our pricing- arrange 
ment our pricing policy. 

Now, what is this pricing policy 
The pricing policy says simply tlm 
we should buy through price compett 
tion. The Air Force wants to awn re 
in a firm fixed price-competitive mar- 
ket. When we buy in that manner, 
tho contractor has tho burden of de- 
termining 1 the most economic alloca- 
tion of his resources. Of course, wo 
also avoid tho requirement for coat oi 1 
pricing data, and costly administra- 
tion and audit. 







SSS?USgrt 

MOTIVE " nuu ^ THE ppm? 



10 



Lt. Col. Jacob B. Pompan, USAP. 

M a 8t ?i dfl ?f,5 t the Air War College 
Maxwell AFB, Ala. Before entering 

SSL?* t ^ as assi ened in the Direc- 
torate of Procurement Policy in Head- 
USAF and wa/ fie Air 
member of the Armed 
Re * ulation 



But uppermost in our minds its tho 
greatest advantage of a FFP award 
through price competition is that \vo 
have placed upon the contractor the 
maximum cost risk. If there 3s real 
competition to insure that his price 
had to be truly competitive, we cnu 
assume that the contractor's contract 
cost risk really ia significant and that 
he will strive for maximum efficiency 
in his operations because of tlmt risk. 
Thus far, the pricing- policy is 
straightforward. We award on (ho 
basis of tho lowest sound price on 
the basis of price competition. Hero 
the pressures and constraints of tho 
competitive market placo arc being re- 
lied upon to force the price, down to 
a reasonable figure and forco blie 
contractor to operate efficiently. 

But, as we know, a fligniflcnnb 
amount of the dollars spent by tho Air 
Force ia not spent through price- com- 
petition. In FY 19G5, 74.8 percent of 
the Air Force's total obligations were 
not price competitive. Tho inability to 
buy through price competition cnn bo 
traced to several causes. It could bo 
that we do not have a sufficiently well 
defined specification of our require- 
ment. It could be that there are Insuf- 
ficient sellers to create a price-com- 
petitive market, or that time Juat 
doesn't permit competition. It is also 
possible that there is a follow-on pro- 
curement in which competition of any 
kind, much less price competition, 
would be unrealistic. 

Now in these and similar situations 
where there is no price competition, , 
how does the pricing policy operate? 
Here we still try to place upon tho 
contractor the maximum degree of 
contract cost risk. In fact, we try to 



October 1964 



motivate him to seek such risks. In 
other words, even though the contract 
may have been awarded on a non- 
price competitive basis, we still try to 
design the contract in such a way that 
the contractor will he motivated to be 
efficient. We want him to act as nearly 
as possible as he would in a price- 
competitive climate. 

In review, we want adequate price 
competition to the maximum degree 
in our procurement because that type 
of procurement places the maximum 
cost risk on the contractor an'd will 
result in the lowest cost to the Gov- 
ernment. However, when we cannot 
get price competition, we design into 
the contract some type of motivation 
which will induce the contractor to 
he- efficient and to function as he 
would in a price competitive-high- 
risk situation. 

In this non-price competitive situa- 
tion we are relying upon two basic 
supporting- policies: the profit policy 
and the incentive policy. 

Looking first at the profit policy, 
we know tihat the Armed Services 
Procurement Regulation (ASPR) 3- 
808.1 says that we should use "profit 



to stimulate efficient contract perform- 
ance." The policy states that low 
profit, the use of historical averages, 
and the application of a predeter- 
mined percentage are detrimental to 
achieving this motivation. The pricing 
policy, therefore, stands for the propo- 
sition that, when a contract is not 
.awarded through price competition, 
the profit policy is one way to gain 
for the Government some of the ad- 
vantages that are normally a part of 
the price-competitive climate. A con- 
tractor who accepts the cost risk and 
performs well will be rewarded with 
increased profit and, if he fails to 
perform, his profit is reduced. Our 
pricing policy, our pricing arrange- 
ments, and a good number of our in- 
novations are intimately tied into this 
philosophy. 

It is all well and good to talk about 
objectives and policies, and to theorize 
about the economics of the model. 
These are the things of which speeches 
are made. However, it is quite another 
thing to provide the buyer with some- 
thing concrete which can be used in 
the day-to-day procurement task 
something which will make these poli- 



cies meaningful and the objective at- 
tainable. We have this in the innova- 
tions in Figure 1. 

The first step is to put these 
procedures these tools in a more 
understandable framework. Though 
we may have a whole host of tools in 
our kit box, they can be placed into 
a few logical groupings. Figure 2 
portrays three rational groups. Group 
1 is called an incentive group. The 
five innovations listed in that group 
are tools with which a buyer can seek 
to motivate a contractor to use his 
resources more efficiently. In one way 
or another, each of them Weighted 
Guidelines, Incentive Contracting and 
Value Engineering provides the con- 
tractor, through the incentive policy 
or the profit policy, and as part of 
the overall pricing policy, with an 
avenue to increase his profits while at 
the same time decreasing the Govern- 
ment's overall contract costs. 

The second grouping is called the 
customer satisfaction group. It's rela- 
tionship with the objective is perhaps 
less obvious than the incentive group, 
but it is no less important. Customer 
satisfaction is another way of saying 



"6v 



Detects 



AGE 









Value Engineering 



\ 



CROUP 1 



GROUP 2 



WEIGHTED GUIDELINES 

INCENTIVE CONIHrtCIING 

VALUt ENGINEERING 

CONTRACTOR WEIGHTED 
AVERAGE SHARE 



WARRANTIES 
CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES 

DEEAULT 

QUALITY ASSURANCE 

LIQUIDATED DAMAGES 

CONIRACIOH PERFORMANCE EVACUATION 

CONTRACTOR EXPEKIiUCE LIST 




TOTAL PACKAGE PROCUREMENT 

MLIL*I-YAR 
STANDARDIZATION 
LIFECrCLECOST 

WEAK OUT 
CONTRACT DEI I Ml TION PHASE 



GROUP 3 



Figure 1. 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



Figure 2. 



11 



hat every reasonable step must bn 
taken to insure that we ask for what 
we want-ami ffet what Wc 

J e ant getting what we p ay for u 
t .s dehvered late or, if upon dfl . 
livery. ,t is not reliable and docs not 
furictmn properly. We are not getting 
what wo pay for or need if We * 
terminate for default and re-procure 
The increased Air Force U8e of the 
correction of deficiencies clause and 
liquidated damages reflects a grow 
me awareness of their value when 
used selectively. Default i s an inc n 

t.v^houKh perhaps a negative n. 
And the mot.vat.on of the contracts 
o look good in the contractor 
forma. evaluation system and o 
stay far away from the Air For 
and the Navy Contractor Ex eHe 
Lists should be obvious. POIle " ce 

At present there is no name for the 
third grouping-pcrhaps because i 
tand. for a lot of different things to 
different People. Therefore, dec Se 
yourself what you see in it 

However, these techniques could 
represent the eternal sear h ini d 
cm-emcnt for that One balance T 
tween .nsuring the maximum p sib t 
compcbfon and the lowest p 'f 
. 'tern, whfle at tte same tta c 
sidermg logistic support cost, and 
many other procurement a ,u 
erational requirements. Mu 
Standardization, Life Cyclo c? 
Total Package Plan, A vn nce 
curement 



him the opportunity to 

h.s profit,, and the r ed uction 
necessarily result. 

This can be made annam* i> 
analyzing one tool from eael of , by 
*ups to demonstr * 

rational 



a 

to look at only two f fl ? 
lighted guidelines: , fat" 
contractor cost risk and thetct ?'' 
contractor performance. " f r 

Cost risk has a profit range off, 
zero to seven fr m 



12 



sibility assumed through the type of 
contract. We are all aware of the ex- 
tensive effort on the part of the Air 
Force to move away from CPFF con- 
tracting into FFP type contracts. 
The theory behind this effort is that, 
as a contractor moves towards FFP 
type contracting, he assumes more of 
the risk and, as he assumes more of 
the coat risk, he becomes more con- 
cerned with the expenditures of re- 
sources. He also has an opportunity 
for increased profits. Therefore, any- 
thing; we can do to encourage him to 
move towards higher risk contract- 
ingwhere theoretically he will be 
more concerned with how he spends 
his resources and towards a type of 
contracting which will give him an 
opportunity to increase his profits 
anything like that^is right in line 
with our objective of COST REDUC- 
TION THROUGH THE PROFIT 
MOTIVE. If that is a reasonable con- 
clusion, then weighted guidelines is 
an excellent tool to achieve that ob- 
jective. 

In contract cost risk the buyer, in 
effect, is telling the contractor that 
the Government will increase its ne- 
gotiation profit objective under 
weighted guidelines if the contractor 
will move up the contract risk spec- 
trum. The higher profits arc worth it 
to us because, as he moves into higher 
risk contracting, the Government 
should achieve cost reduction due to 
the contractor's increased concern for 
now he spends his resources or more 
to the point; COST REDUCTION 
THROUGH THE PROFIT MOTIVE. 
Performance is the second factor in 
weighted guidelines. We know that 
m some contracts, such as CPFF 
there is minimal cost risk to the con- 
tractor. If our theory of motivation 
depended solely on cost risk, we would 
be out of luck in a CPFF contract 
environment. However, motivation 
depends upon more than cost risk 
Even m the CPFF environment, we 
tell the contractor that he is beimr 
watched. We are watching the way 
he manages his and our resources, 
the way he delivers, the quality of 
nis product, and the degree to which 
he implements small business and 
abor surplus goals. We hope that 
u. watchfulness on our part, and 
he contractor's knowledge that what 
ve lea, will have a bearing upon 
future source selections and profit 
rates, will have a noticeable impatt 
u " how the contractor operates 



under the present contract. Wc think 
that this factor in weighted jrui<tc- 
lines has a very direct eon n oc I ion 
with the objective because Ihc con- 
tractorin theory at least should 
try in any type of contract and oven 
in a CPFF environment to ho till- 
cient, to allocate hia resources iriM- 
Hgently, and to search for coat reduc- 
tion. For he knows that hia profits on 
future contracts, or even the? uwiml 
of those contracts, could well b in 
the balance. 

Under Group 2 wo shall 
the correction of deficiencies 

How do warranties in g-n no inl- 
and correction of 'deficiencies ctausca 
in particularrelate to the Air Km-co 
objective? The Air Force linn a for. 
rnal correction of deficiencies policy, 
In its simplest form, it roqujrca a con- 
tractor to perform precisely us h Inis 
contracted. If tho product fails to pn- 
form, he must correct tho deficiency. 
It is receiving wide application in (lift 
Air Force. 

The contractor, who is faced with 
compliance with tho correction of tin- 
ficioncyor any sound warranty for 
that matter and also faced with pric- 
ing constraints, has a distinct motiva- 
tion which wo feel is consistent wllk 
the objective. Ho docs not want to In- 
burdened with the costs of repair and 
replacement of defective material; 
he docs not want to be pinpointed n 
a manufacturer of low quality mn- 
terlal. In a price-compotitivo siliin- 
tion, he does not want to price him- 
self out of an award by including 
unreasonable contingencies for (fiis 
warranty. As a consequence of thcsn 
considerations, wo think that he, will 
become more aware of his rrajKni- 
sibility to provide us with precisely 
the product which we ordered and 
that he will exert more attention to 
the quality of his product. Finally, \w. 
feel that with these provisions the 
Air Force will get a better product 
and this is cost reduction. When wo 
get a product that breaks flown In tho 
field even if it is replaced at no coat 
that is not customer satisfaction. 
Getting paid for that breakdown is 
not what we are in business for. Wo 
want a product that will perform 
rather than just a contractor who will 
pay the bill for the product failure. 
A broader, but intelligent, use of war- 
ranties and correction of deficiencies 
clauses will bring homo to contractors 



October 1966 



an awareness of our interest in this 
performance; an awareness that his 
profits and the award of subsequent 
contracts will be affected by that per- 
formance. Hopefully, within the Air 
Force, it will reduce the sometimes 
measurable but often immeasurable 
costs that accompany materiel 
failure. Again: COST REDUCTION 
THROUGH THE PROFIT MOTIVE. 
Now, let us turn to the last group- 
ing. The innovations here are of im- 
mense importance today in procure- 
ment and the systems acquisition busi- 
ness. Any one of thorn deserves con- 
siderable space for discussion. How- 
ever, the purpose of this article 
is only to show the tie-in to the 
objective. With that in mind, let's 
look at the latest of these : total pack- 
age procurement concept. This type 
of procurement envisions the procure- 
ment in a single competition of the 
engineering development and produc- 
tion of a system with as much sup- 
port, such as aerospace ground 
equipment, spares, training equipment 
and contractor technical support, as 
is practicable. 

Total package seeks to avoid the 
dilemma caused in the past when a 
contractor, building only the develop- 
ment portion of a program, had a 
tendency to quote rather conserva- 
tively. He could afford to do so since 
the development contract amounted 
to a relatively small percentage of the 
total program. His main incentive at 
that juncture was to secure the con- 
tract. His overall risk was rather 
small, however, since his work in the 
development portion of the contract 
almost invariably established him as 
a sole source in the event of follow-on 
production. Total package procure- 
ment deals not only with the develop- 
ment, or the top of the iceberg as it 
has been called, but rather the entire 
program. The contractor signs a con- 
tract that includes firm prices, or 
a firm pricing arrangement, not only 
for the development but for the fol- 
low-on production right through aero- 
space ground equipment and support 
as well. 

There could be many important re- 
sults of this approach; 

The contractor having- won, in a 
competitive environment, work that 
involves the total system will be moti- 
vated from the outset to design the 
product with maximum efficiency. It 
is unlikely that he will have many 
value engineering change proposals 



in the production portion of the con- 
tract for his financial reward in pro- 
duction will grow from a maximum 
effort during the development en- 
gineering. He will begin his value 
engineering at the start of develop- 
ment engineering, 

His coat risk is very large. Pie 
can't "buy in" with impunity, for his 
contract which results from competi- 
tion is not merely for the develop- 
ment but for production as well. It is 
safe to say that, through this unique 
application of incentive contracting, 
the Air Force has developed a tech- 
nique which magnifies not only the 
opportunity but earned profit on the 
part of the contractor, and through 
that opportunity, significant cost re- 
duction. 

This article attempts only to 
sharpen the perspective of what's hap- 
pening around us in Government con- 
tracting. 

Several of the techniques which 
buyers are faced with in everyday 
operations have been mentioned . How- 
ever, even though only a few of them 
have been discussed, this relationship 
that I attempt to draw between the 
objective and the policies, and the 
techniques or toots, exists to some de- 
gree in, every single instance strong 
in some, tenuous or perhaps even dis- 
turbing in others but, nevertheless, 
it is a relationship to be reckoned 
with. 

There is one point that should be 
stressed. It is important to recognize 
a difference between the objective, the 
policies that support the objective, 
and the tools that we hope will nuikc 
the policies work, The objective was 
set at the highest level. It is funda- 
mental to scores of Air Force poli- 
cies and actions. Changing it is ex- 
tremely unlikely. The pricing policy 
and the supporting policies of profit 
and incentives are also firmly estab- 
lished at the highest levels within the 
Air Force. To some degree they are 
spelled out in various places in the 
ASPR. In- some respects they merely 
reflect economic facts of life. They 
would also be difficult to tamper with. 

Finally, let's look at the tools or in- 
novations which we use to carry out 
the policies. These are the easiest to 
design and to change. Many are not 
yet even implemented in the ASPR, 
It's with these tools bhat the contract- 
ing officer can have the greatest influ- 
ence in designing the contract. In 
fact he has a responsibility to evalu- 



ate these to see if they work, and 
recommend changes if they don't help 
him to implement the stated policies 
and achieve the objective, 

In other words, don't criticize any 
of these innovations because you 
doubt the validity of the objective, or 
the profit or incentive policy. Rather, 
criticize the innovations if in your 
opinion they fail to help us achieve 
the objective. 

In summary: 

There is a fundamental Air 

Force objective towards which all our 
contractual pricing efforts should be 
directed; that is COST REDUC- 
TION THROUGH THE PROFIT 
MOTIVE. 

This objective is supported by 
the pricing, profit and incentive poli- 
cies. 

This entire complex of the ob- 
jective the pricing- policy and the 
two policies of profit and incentives 
are, in turn, supported by a multi- 
tude of techniques. Some techniques 
arc very valuable ami firmly estab- 
lished in our procedures. Some are 
rather transitory. All impact in some 
way on our daily efforts to achieve 
the objective. 

When the contracting officer 
doesn't like what's going on in the 
Government contracting field, he has 
a hunting license in this area of pro- 
cedures, 

We should very critically evalu- 
ate and question each innovation 
against the standard of what it docs, 
or fails to do, to help us achieve our 
stated objective: COST REDUC- 
TION THROUGH THE PROFIT 
MOTIVE. 

I would like to leave you with one 
last word of reassurance. These large 
numbers of new procedures are 
without 'doubt an important part of 
the way wo do business today. But 
we should all remember that they are 
merely a means to an end. We can- 
not become so enamoured with the 
sophisticated new techniques that we 
lose sight of the real reason that we 
resort to. them, i.e., to make sure 
that the product or service we need 
comes out the end of the line at the 
right time, at the right place, and in 
a quantity and quality to satisfy our 
requirement. That thought is upper- 
most in the minds of the people that 
write the policies. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



13 




DOD Directive 4650.1, "Manage- 
ment and Use of the Radio Frequency 
Spectrum," Aug. 23, 1966. Establishes 
policy and assigns responsibilities for 
the management and use of the radio 
frequency spectrum within DOD. 

DOD instruction 4410,6, "Uniform 
Materiel Movement and Issue Priority 
System (UMMIPS)," Aug. 24, 1966, 
Reissues DOD Instruction 4410 6 
same subject, Aug. 20, 1964, to pro- 
mote consistent interpretation and ap- 
plication of UMMIPS procedures and 
to _ clarify relationships between the 
Priority designators established in the 

H.1 7nv n ^~ the industrial priori- 
ties (DX and DO established in DOD 
Instruction 4410.1, "Priorities and 
Allocations Manual'/' June 8, 1954 
mntnf % ot * v * a ^30.18, "Depart- 



ss-aF^-ia 



An Inventory of Geof/raphio Re- 
search of the Humid Tropic, Environ- 
ment, Vol. I, KWIC Index Humid 

tropic Environmental Literature Tex- 
as Instruments Inc., Dallas, Tex., for 

No'. AD-fSs^G. ?S. B15 PPl rd01 ' 
Chromium Masks for Mierocireuitw. 
Army Electronics Command, Fort 
Monmouth N.J., May 1906, 20 m> 
Order No. AD-634 762. $1. ' P 

Diffused Resistor Temperature, Co- 
efficient Improvement. Hoi, I 
oorp, Research Center, Honk Ins 

"So^LlMl, 1 ^' 

Optimization^ Study of an Kx- t ' ' 

Forest, 111. for the Army, Anril ir 
46 pp. Order No. AD-884 788 $2 
Navaf *c^? W ? Pr ^' crt f cs of Sfiotereto. 
M-nr in/ 1 /- c J J ''K 1 iioenng Iiiiborntorv. 

074 y $3 ' BG PP< rdcr No ' AD-084 

Basis for Kir/id Pavement 
for Military Airfields. Army 

01 lMl O-mnnvo 1W,,.. inn/. nn * 
'. 77 PI), 



... -,,.,-v,.//fl /or /)r/rd (ififi 
/"Httrfw: /'wri //. Midlfinii 

., ipuliH, Mlnn. r for ' 

May l!)(i(i, (i|i , 

It t- I t .T* , % ' It' 



CV, 



/>/<./ for 



n ,1, M A,,- 

Ordor No, Al)-fi,'{f, 



'- Ju| y 



,,, 
B, If 5 

' 
10!) 



-- 
Turbulent ,ht. m f 



rf 



21 ' 




t> iTi- UULaHi ea irom: 

...-* - 



Order No. 



pi, 1 , 1 liu IiiHtituto, 



. 

ircuit .V 



P, 



jor-mation. Ntorttna 

/..... - mi-,-, V.V ' " 



ae 

Army, April 198? 
AD-634 077. $4 ' 

Hydrocarbon-Ai 



s. Union 
l 2.' for the 
PP ' Ord No. 



m. M l r J fl. 180 

dnr No. AD-flHO 4R. $fi. 



the 



lMA' . 

<lor No. AT)-Ofl(i 520. $7. 



o tt 
HIM W 

. OB PP. 



-631 






21 



on i ri A d floc Commutes 






w Sv If Nat onal Acn'y <* 
'National Roaearch Counclt, 

r? imr A m 9 nt of ^GCcnso, July 
80S pp. Order No. AD-63C 529. 



Ignitwn Characteristics of Ftiels 
'ubncantB. Bureau of Mines for 
ir Force, March 1060, 83 pi>. 
No. AD-032 730, $3. 
Mechanism of Microbiological Con- 
tamination of Jet Fuel and Develop- 
ment of Techniques for Detection of 
* / " w " 1 '^'-"^ Contamination. Mel- 

(Continued-on Page 41) 



October 1966 




by 

Col. Herbert Waldman, USAF 



The direction of effort to improve 
the performance measurement of 
large Defense weapon system proj- 
ects and contracts was described gen- 
erally in an article on the Selected 
Acquisitions Information and Man- 
agement System (SAIMS) in the 
July 1966 issue of the Defense In- 
dustry Bulletin ("The Development of 
SAIMS"," p. 20). The current phase 
of that effort, in which the construc- 
tive collaboration of Government and 
industry is continuing;; is the develop- 
ment of a DOD Schedule and Cost 
Planning and Control System Speci- 
fication (SCPCS) for use with large 
negotiated contracts which are part 
of major high-cost and long-term 
programs. 

We are seeking constructive com- 
ments from the industrial community 
to assist in developing a meaningful 
and workable product which may be 
used as a contractual requirement. In 
that effort the Ofilce of the Secretary 
of Defense (OSD) has distributed a 
draft specification dated May 6, 1966, 
to the Council of Defense and Space 
Industries Association and to presi- 
dents of CO large corporations. The 
development of the specification is 
also being coordinated with other 
Government agencies which share a 
common interest in using such tech- 
niques. 

The objective of the specification 
approach is to outline the basic cri- 
teria that a contractor's planning 'and 
control system should meet. Among 
these are capabilities for providing 
specified kinds of data which effec- 
tive planning and control systems 
would normally be expected to gen- 
orate. Past studies conducted by DOD 
have consistently revealed existing 
deficiencies, e.g,, the fact that con- 
tractor's systems for internal control 
were often found to be different from 
those used by the contractor to re- 
spond to the Government's reporting 
requirements. 

Because DOD data requirements 
have often been out of phase, in both 
time and substance, with what was 
being generated in al contractor's in- 
ternal management system, Defense 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



managers have been inhibited in using 
contractor data in the form provided 
for prediction and decision making on 
relevant contracts and programs. Too 
often in the past, additional, some- 
times duplicative, data requirements 
were generated for use in validating 
and adjusting originally furnished 
data which should have been sufficient 
to accomplish the intended purpose. 

So long as the Government re- 
mains the contractor's cost-sharing 
partner, we will have an intense 
interest in a contractor's capability 
for producing results as planned and 
the timely delivery of specified prod- 
ucts meeting clearly identified per- 
formance criteria. Defense interest in 
the management of cost in negotiated 
type contracts will also be stimulated 
by cost uncertainties which are indi- 
,cated when contracts arc negotiated 
with price ceilings as much as 30 per- 
cent over target costs. 

In view of such Government inter- 
est, our current effort seeks to assure 
that a single internal control system 
will be used by our larger con- 
tractors which meets their needs as 
well as our own. This would elim- 




Col. Herbert Waldman, USAF, is 
Dir. for Assets Management Systems 
in the Office of the Asst. Secretary 
of Defense (Comptroller). He is a 
graduate of the University of Michi- 
gan and holds a master's degree 
in international affairs from George 
Washington University. 



inate the need to create separate and 
duplicate systems in any one plant as 
we have seen in the past. It has been 
expensive to develop many diversified 
systems resulting in the waste of 
thousands of dollars which could have 
been better/ applied to the develop- 
ment and production of hardware, 

An early implementation of the 
DOD specification will result in bet- 
ter understanding of most DOD data 
requirements. It will greatly ease the 
contractors' current problems of pre- 
paring special reports which are re- 
sponsive to the different criteria re- 
quested by various agencies within 
DOD. Implementing- guidance for 
use by DOD components, in a form 
not yet determined, will also be de- 
veloped with the specification ap- 
proach. 

The specification approach is noth- 
ing new in management. What is new 
is the development of a specific re- 
quirement for a contractor to: 

Plan work in significant work 
packages. 

Operate budget systems which 
are compatible with his plan. 

Accumulate, retrieve and provide 
current statu s information on a 
timely basis. 

These points essentially promote 
the integration of existing "data with 
quality improved by using some 
sharponed-Lip management tools. 

There are five fundamental features 
in this approach : 

The contractor accommodates the 
requirements of the specification 
within his own organizational struc- 
ture and determines how the items of 
work are related to contract objec- 
tives. 

Both the DOD procurement 
agency's and a contractor's schedule 
and cost data requirements will be de- 
rived from the same management sys- 
tem. 

Cost and schedule accomplish- 
ment will be identified at a level of 
responsibility described in terms of 
the contractor's management orga- 
nization (work packages). 

Once DOD approves a con- 
tractor's implementation of the speci- 
fication, a -reduction in reporting re- 
quirements, as compared to existing 
practices, should occur. {The Govern- 
ment should utilize summary reports 
knowing that detailed information in 
a contractor's internal system will 



(Continued on Page 



15 



by 
Dr. Eugene T. Ferraro 



Nearly all Defense Department ac- 
tivity, except actual warfare, is, for 
practical purposes, a form of educa- 
tion and training for that eventuality. 
Therefore, improved and superior 
educational processes have a signifi- 
cant bearing on all that we do. This 
is particularly true in the Air Force 
where we have such a high propor- 
tion of technical skill requirements as 
opposed to total requirements. The 
Air Force has been a leader in meet- 
ing this educational challenge. 

What is the military more par- 
ticularly the Air Force planning, 
proposing, hoping to do in the field of 
education? 

Are we qualified to make recom- 
mendations, decisions, etc.? 

Is the military viewpoint and its 
philosophy of educational develop- 
ment in the best interest of the na- 
tion's overall cultural objectives? 

Recognizing that education in DOD 
is one of the nation's major activi- 
ties, we have a responsibility to do 
it well, to assure that it shall not 
waste our resources material and 
human and that it is designed to 
attain our national goals cultural 
and spiritual as well as military. 

On June 14 and 16, after months 
of study planning, DOD officials pre- 
sented this assessment of Defense 
manning to some 700 representatives 
of industry, education and Govern- 
ment. This was at a conference spon- 
sored jointly by the National Security 
Industrial Association, the Defense 
Department, the Office of Education 
and the Department of Labor. 

Defense spokesmen explained the 
massive task to be done and the pro- 
grams already undertaken to improve 
the doing of it. They asked industry, 
with the help of all necessary sup- 
porting resources, to focus on this 
complex and difficult problem. They 
pointed out that, while much new 
technology could be made to 



appx-oach which has served well in 
deriving solutions. A number of our 
major aerospace contractors have per- 
fected the study and analysis tech- 
niques, Together, we have learned how 
to grasp the overall nature of world- 
wide and universe-wide problems. We 
have developed the "total" view wihich 
identifies and inventories all the sub- 
systems and elements involved and 
finds the significant interrelationships 
of these parts. Finally, we have per- 
fected a mathematical formulation 
technique which often allows meas- 
urement, priority establishment and 
some reasonable predictability. 

The time has come to bring to bear 
the force of this analysis and solution 
technique to education and training. 
This area has earned a priority for 
such attention from our best analysts, 
economists and administrators. 

The sheer magnitude of our Air 
Force structure requires tremendous 
systems study, organization planning 1 
and implementation capability. It has 
stimulated our concern with systems 
techniques and made the Air Force 
the nation's' leading exponent; how- 
ever, we realize we must go still fur- 




ther to retain the kind of superiority 
we now have. 

Secretary of the Air Force Harold 
Brown, in response to the question, 
"What one thing would you like most 
to achieve in the next few years?" 
stated: "An analytical capability for 
the Air Force to equal its drive, excel- 
lence in management, and its great 
spirit. I want to help organize the 
talents which already exist within the 
Air Force to still further improve its 
materiel, training, and combat capa- 
bility, so that it can play its part for 
the best interests of the United States 
and the Free World." 

As a recent acquisition from indus- 
try with some involvement in com- 
plex tasks for the Military Services, I 
visualize the Air Force need for edu- 
cation and training- as flowing- first 
from an overall manpower analysis 
based on authorized force levels. 
Efforts are being conducted separately 
to improve our capabilities for this. 
Second, we have a 1 need to improve 
a personnel management system, 
under which our "inventory" of man- 
power resourcesofficers, airmen, 
civilians and contracted services 
are surveyed continuously. This sys- 
tem must provide for the inflow of 
new personnel and the outflow of 
separations projected and for recogni- 
tion of promotion potential and sub- 
sequent upgrading, Historical data 
will enable us to make quantitative 
estimates from which we can derive 
probable education and training- re- 
quirements on which to plan our ef- 
forts. 

Assuming we have a sound total 
requirements picture before us, I be- 
lieve we could address ourselves to the 
educational and training "subsystem" 
and view it as a total enterprise. We 
would need to select three segments 
for a start: 

What should wo be teaching; 

How should we do it? 
Are we getting results? 

In more elegant terms, this would 
be curriculum, instructional technol- 
ogy and testing. This whole package 
vould, in effect, comprise an educa- 
;ional technology. 

We are devoting elaborate efforts 
o analyzing the educational and 
raining needs of various assignments 
md jobs. We may be doing an excef- 
ent job; however, we may be able to 
fet a better means of verifying the 
ffectiveness of our programs by a 

(Contented on Page 38) 



October 1966 




The ADAM II propulsive wing, a 
revolutionary new aircraft with en- 
gines located inside the wings, is being 
evaluated by the TJ. S, Air Force at 
its Flight Dynamics Laboratory, 
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. 

A full-span, powered model will be 
designed, built and tested by Ling- 
Temco-Vought, Inc., Dallas, Tex., 
under a $439,000 contract jointly 
funded by the Flight Dynamics Lab- 
oratory and the U. S. Army Aviation 
Materials Laboratory, Fort Eustis, 
Va. 

ADAM, an acronym for Air De- 
flection and Modulation, features a 
unique integration of vertically- 
mounted high-bypass-ration turbof ans 
into a propulsive wing. The thrust 
from the tuorbofans can be deflected 
downward 100 degrees for use in 
vertical takeoff and landing. 

The powered model will have a wing 
span of nearly five and one-quarter 
feet. The model will consist of a 
fuselage, propulsive wing, booms and 
tail. Wings will house four tip turbine 
fans to simulate the propulsive 
systems. 

The propulsive wing will have 
movable flap-ailerons, which adjust 
from 20 degrees up to 100 degrees 
down, and a tail configuration consist- 
ing of twin outboard vertical fins and 
outboard horizontal control surfaces. 

Wind tunnel tests at the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administra- 



tion's Langley Research Center will 
include all flight modes. Low-speed 
tests in the 17-foot transition tunnel 
will evaluate the aircraft's vertical 
takeoff and landing, short takeoff and 
landing, and maneuvering capabilities. 
High-speed tests in the 16-foot tun- 
nel will investigate effectiveness of the 
outboard tail, flap-ailerons and high- 
speed drag of the propulsive wing. 

The propulsive wing: design shows 
promise of good engine-to-airframe 
match in the cruise mode, a high mach 
number of drag divergence (which 
make high subsonic cruise flight pos- 
sible) and relatively low downwash 
velocities and temperatures for verti- 
cal takeoff and landing. 

Possible uses of the ADAM concept 
would be for an aircraft with a high 
subsonic strike-reconnaissance capa- 
bility operating from widely dispersed 
andmg sites, and vertical takeoff and 
landing transport aircraft. 

The contract is the first undertaken 
by the Flight Dynamics Laboratory in 
its investigation of vertical-short-field 
takeoff and landing (V/STOL) aero- 
dynamics. To expand its research 
capabilities in this area, the labora- 
tory has established a V/STOL Aero- 
dynamics Group in the Flight Me- 
chanics Division. 

Work on the IE-month contract on 
the ADAM II propulsive wing- will be 
completed in May 19C7. 




NORAD To Award 

Contracts on Command 

and Control Platform 

The North American Air Defense 
Command has announced that con- 
tracts totaling more than $4 million 
will be awarded to develop a new all- 
defense airborne command and control 
platform. 

Since last summer, major aircraft 
companies have been doing feasibility 
studies for an airborne warning and 
control system (AWACS) for the Air 
Force. Boeing and Douglas Aircraft 
have been picked to conduct further 
studies aimed at completion of concept 
formulation in about a year. 

It is expected negotiations will re- 
sult in an award of contracts of 
$2,100,000 each to these companies. 

Upon determination that an ap- 
propriate radar design is available, 
one of the contractors will be selected 
to develop prototype systems. 

AWACS is envisioned as an auto- 
mated airborne command and control 
system for world-wide use with air 
defense and tactical forces. It would 
use a high-performance, subsonic air- 
craft carrying radar, communications 
and data-processing equipment. 

According to air defense experts, 
the system would make it impossible 
for enemy bombers to fly over, under, 
or around the radar surveillance net- 
work. 



ADAM II. An artist's concept shows a fighter aircraft which incorporates 
engines within the wing. With a 100-degree downward deflection of the air- 
crafts thrust, the fighter can operate from short landing fields in forward 
combat areas. 



COIN 

(Continued from Page S) 
the Navy Board of Inspection and 
Survey and an All-Service Evaluation 
Group. 

Present Marine Corps requirements 
are for 100 OV-lOA's which will be 
used for both visual and photographic 
reconnaissance, for escorting heli- 
copters, for limited close air support, 
an'd for light cargo and personnel 
transport. In short, the OV-10A 
(COIN) is expected to be a versatile 
vehicle for the Marine Corps in the 
sort of environment which it now faces 
in Southeast Asia. 

The Air Force has a current re- 
quirement for 157 OV-10A aircraft 
for use primarily in the forwai-d air 
controller role. 

The Army is closely monitoring 
the COIN development primarily for 
a vehicle to be used for electronic 
surveillance operations. More sophis- 
ticated electronic equipment would be 
required for this mission, 

Military Assistance Program use of 
the COIN would need only a small 
amount of unsophisticated equipment. 
Firm commitments for this use are 
expected tn the future. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Oct. 25-26: Ninth Navy/Industry Con- 

ference on Material Reliability, 

Washington, D.C. 
Oct. 27-28: Tulsa Chamber of Com- 

merce Air Festival, Riverside Air- 

port, Tulsa, Okla. 
Oct. 31-Nov. 2: Defense Supply Assn. 

National Convention, Benjamin 

Franklin Hotel, Philadelphia, Pa. 
Nov. 2: Industrial Management So- 

ciety Meeting, Chicago, 111. 
Nov. 2-4: Northeast Electronic Re- 

search & Engineering Meeting, 

Boston, Mass. 
Nov. 2-1; Air Force/National Secur- 



Nov. 8-10: Joint Computer Confer- 
ence, San Francisco, Calif. 



Nov. 9: National Security Industrial 
Assn. Meeting, Naval Ordnance 
Laboratory, Corona, Calif. 

Nov. 14-16: American Petroleum In- 
stitute Meeting, New York City, 

Nov. 15-17: Ships Control Systems 
Symposium, Annapolis, Md. 

Nov. 17: Industrial Procurement Con- 
ference, Louisville, Ky. 

Nov. 29-Dec. 2: American Institute 
of Aeronautics and Astronautics 
Annual Meeting and Technical Dis- 
play, Boston, Mass. 

Nov. 29-Dec. 1: American Society for 
Metals Meeting, Detroit, Mich. 

Nov. 30-Dec. 2: Wire and Cable Sym- 
poaium, Atlantic City, N.J. 



ANNUAL SURVEY 



Postage 
Required 



DEFENSE INDUSTRY BULLETIN 
Business & Labor Division 

Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense 
(Public Affairs) 

Washington, D. C, 20301 



Continue Sending p 

Remove Name from List 

My Address Is Correct n 
(Including Zip Code) 



Change my Address to: 




Dec. 7: Pearl Harbor Day, Nation 
wide. 

Dec. 4-8: American Institute of Cheni 
ical Engineers Meeting, Be troll 
Mich. 

Dec. 6-8: Chemical Specialities Mffi 

Assn. Meeting, Hollywood, Fia, 
Dec. 16: Wright Memorial Dinner 

Aero Club of Washington, D.C. 
Dec. 26-31: American Assn. for Art. 

vancement of Science Meeting, 

Washington, D.C. 

Dec, 27-28: Industrial Relations Its- 
search Assn. Meeting, Chicago, III, 



Increased Tactical Aircraft 
Production Announced 

Secretary of Defense made the fol- 
lowing; statement on Sept. 22, 1068, 
concerning 1 increased production of 
tactical aircraft for FY 1968: 

"You will recall that when I an- 
nounced a cutback of approximately 
one billion dollars in the planned ex- 
penditures for air munitions produc- 
tion last July 11, I also announced 
that we were examining into produc- 
tion schedules for ground munitions, 
aircraft, helicopters and other lame 
cost items. 

"Wo have now completed a review 
of the tactical aircraft situation, In 
the case of air munitions, we found it 
prudent to decrease production rates 
while building to an air ordnance in- 
ventory of more than 500,000 torn 
within a year. Now we find it prudent 
to act to increase the production of 
tactical aircraft for FY 1968 by ap- 
proximately 280 planes. The coat of 
the additional aircraft will amount to 
approximately $700 million. 

''As you know, the FY 1967 dofonao 
budget was based upon the assumption 
that combat operations In Southeast 
T I ia j w ultl continue to June 80, 1967. 
1 told Congress repeatedly that if tlio 
conflict were to continue beyond that 
date we would have to adjust certain 
programs accordingly. 

"Because of the long lead times in- 
volved in aircraft production, I have 
come to the conclusion that it is wise 
now to place on order aircraft that 
may be required to support operations 
beyond June 80, 1967. 

"Our review was based on many 
factors, including projections on num- 
bers and types of sorties and pre- 
dicted loss rates. It takes into account 
all experience to date. Tactical air- 
craft production schedules for FY's 
1966, 1967 and 1968 have been de- 
veloped to insure that new deliveries 
of aircraft will exceed potential 
losses." 



October 1966 



Identification Friend or Foe 



by 

R. G. Stiles 



With the advent of radar in the 
late thirties, it became necessary to 
identify in some way the friendly air- 
craft and other vehicles detected by 
these radars. This identification was 
required to prevent destruction by 
friendly anti-aircraft batteries, etc., 
and had to be accomplished by some 
sort of cooperative device in the air- 
craft or other vehicle itself. These de- 
vices were then, and still are, trig- 
gered by signals from the ship, air- 
craft, or ground installation requir- 
ing- identification, The last 10 years 
have seen an increasing demand for 
better and more accurate identifica- 
tion equipment for aircraft and, in 
some instances, surface craft. The air- 
craft requirement applies not only to 
military vehicles, but also to aircraft 
in a civilian environment. To this 
end, improvements have been de- 
veloped for the existing Mark X 
(SIF) series of IFF beacon equip- 
ments. 

In 1961 the President directed that 
the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) 
establish project BEACON for the 
express purpose of conducting "an en- 
gineering review of all aviation facili- 
ties and related research and develop- 
ment." This review was to result in a 
practical long-range plan to ensure 
efficient, safe and positive control of 
all aircraft within the United States. 

Basically, the AIMS program is a 
D OD-directed project involving the 
Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, 
Army and FAA. The Services require 
equipment in all categories of the pro- 
gram, while the FAA is involved in 
the air traffic control only. 

This article will be devoted to the 
air traffic control portions of the pro- 
gram. In order to provide as near a 
common system as possible among the 
agencies involved, the AIMS program 
was established by DOD with the Air 
Force as the executive agent. The Sys- 
tem Program Office (SPO) was estab- 
lished at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 
under the Aeronautical Systems Divi- 
sion (ASD). The program director 
has his headquarters there and coor- 
dinates and directs all aspects of the 
development and procurement of 



equipment. The Navy AIMS project 
was established! by Chief of Naval 
Material charter in February 1965, al- 
though Navy AIMS responsibility in 
the program dated back to September 
1963, when the DOD AIMS project 
was chartered. During this interval, 
the project/program managers in the 
IFF field in the Bureau of Naval 
Weapons and the Bureau of Ships 
were responsible for the coordination 
of the program among the Services 
and in conjunction with the several 
interested Bureau of Naval Weapons 
offices for the coherence of the pro- 
gram in the Navy itself. 

In order to meet the requirements 
of the National Standard for Com- 
mon System Component Characteris- 
tics for the IFF Mark X (SIP) /Air 
Traffic Control Radar Beacon Sys- 
tems, much of the existing beacon 
equipment must be scrapped and new 
units provided. The new equipment 
involves the following major changes 
to the basic Mark X (SIF) System: 

The first feature will permit in- 
dividual identification of aircraft, thus 
improving the air traffic control capa- 
bilities. This improvement also will 
lend itself to automatic control facili- 
ties. 




R. G. Stiles, Dep. Project Man- 
ager, Navy AIMS Project Office, has 
been working as n civilian employee 
With the Navy Department since 1950. 
He was one of the original staff of 
the AIMS Project Office when it was 
established in 1965. 



The next added feature will be 
altitude reporting aiding the air traffic 
control functions and reducing the 
amount of traffic on the voice com- 
munications networks. The altitude 
reporting requirement necessitates 
changes to the airborne transponder, 
allowing it to reply to a new inter- 
rogation mode, and provide for the 
transmission of data encoded from 
altitude information. This means also 
that aircraft altimeter systems must 
be updated to meet the maximum 
error requirements of 250 feet 
established as the system goal and 
also to provide data fed to the trans- 
ponder transmitter, To accomplish 
this, the altitude sensors must be 
either redesigned or relocated in the 
aircraft and a pick-off devised to en- 
code altitude information to feed to 
the transponder. 

When airborne transponders are 
triggered by energy radiated in 
the side lobe pattern of the inter- 
rogator antenna, replies of a spurious 
nature are generated. These lead to 
errors in azimuth determination and 
also tend to produce noisome clutter 
on the display scope. To eliminate this 
problem side lobe suppression tech- 
niques must be applied to the cir- 
cuitry, both in the transponder and 
in the interrogator. 

More clutter is added to the 
displays by non-synchronous replies, 
i.e., replies by a transponder to inter- 
rogations from other interrogators. 
These produce what is known as 
"fruit," To eliminate this situation, 
defruiting techniques must be de- 
veloped to discriminate against re- 
plies to interrogators other than the 
one of immediate interest. 

In order to provide an im- 
proved IFF system, it will be neces- 
sary to increase the duty cycle of the 
interrogator transmitter and incor- 
porate state of-the-art advances in the 
control circuitry for the transmitter. 
This necessitates some re-engineering 
effort which can be accomplished on a 
production contract. 

The final change necessary to 
the system will be to frequency stabi- 
lize the interrogator transmitter to 
tolerances specified by the national 
standard and not required in the 
earlier equipment, 

In addition to the implementation 
of the specific capabilities noted 
above, the AIMS program is also re- 
sponsible for the standardization of 
essential system characteristics among 
the Services. This permits meeting 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



overall operational requirements on 
Inml, on the sea and in the air with 
a minimum ol differences in equip- 
ment among all users. 

The precf-dtnf? paragraphs have 
prt'.-f-ntfd the impact of the new sys- 
tem on the old and have shown the 
way Uiu Services will handle the new 
operational equipment. Let us now 
turn to the system itself and deter- 
mine how it works. 

The .scope of this project is such 
that large quantities of equipment in 
all categories will be procured. In gen- 
eral, contracts will be awarded on 
a competitive basis from approved 
AIMS specifications. 

The AIMS system consists of inter- 
rogators-asking a coded question; 
transiwntlers replying to the coded 
question; computers decoding both 
questions and responses ; servoed 
altimeters providing altitude infor- 
mation; and altitude encoder sets- 
providing coding information to the 
transponder for transmission to re- 
questing interrogator. 

As shown in Figure 1, the inter- 
rogators are included in all AIMS- 
equipped ground and surface sites 
and in some airborne vehicles. The 
interrogator is generally associated 
with, or slaved to, a primary radar 
and derives target azimuth and range 
information from this source. The 
transponders are utilized in aircraft 
to provide identity and altitude infor- 
mation, but can also play a useful 



role in identification of friendly 
surface craft and ground sites, 

When the Navy AIMS project was 
chartered by the Chief of Naval Ma- 
terial, the project manager, Captain 
Norman D. Champlin, was assigned 
responsibility for the Navy portion 
of the AIMS program. Tasks involved 
include research, development, test 
and evaluation, acquisition and sup- 
port of the AIMS systems, subsys- 
tems and equipment used by the Navy 
or by the other Services when as- 
signed to the Navy for procurement 
by the Air Force SPO at Wright- 
Patterson AFB. 

The project manager is also as- 
signed responsibility for control of 
funds and budgeting. Systems en- 
gineering and system integration in 
the Navy area are his responsibility 
in accordance with such directives as 
may be handed down by the Air 
Force project director and also by 
the Chief of Naval Material. 



The management of this project 
demonstrates the ability of the 
three Services to come up with and 
administer a common program. The 
efforts are reflected in reduced devel- 
opment and procurement costs and in 
the use of equipment common to all 
types of DOD activity. It has shown 
what progress can be made by the 
Services in conjunction with a civilian 
agency since the FAA is directly in- 
volved. 



Mefalworking Technology 

To Be Subject of USAF 
Symposium at Las Vegas 

A Metalworldng Technology Syrn* 
posium the first in a Dorics com- 
memorating; tho golden annlvcrsay d 
the Air Force Materials Lulninitory, 

Wright- Patter son AFT!, (>luu w j|l (. 

held Jan. 10-13 in Lna VrtfriiH, Nrv. 

The purpose of tho .lympOMfiiin is (o 
review progress in Air Kom^por.- 
sored metallurgical practising pro- 
grams and to forecast mnmifncuinn; 
methods requirements in thin nn>;i for 
Air Force sponsorship in Hits nr\t five 
years. Tho symposium. Hpousoivi! ly 
the laboratory's Motallui'KU'iil 1'ir-c- 
essing Branch, Manufacturing Tr<-fc- 
nology Division, will .f(>iilim> Icrhnfrjl 
sessions on forging, rolling, t'listinx', 
extruding; and drawing powder mHal- 
u . lr y, composite materiulH, ami s|v- 
cialized motal working 1 jn'oni'siH^ nni 
equipment. 

_ Technical papers roproKniidnj; jtfff- 
nificant technology dovclnpnl umff-r 
Air Force contract will 1! nrcspnd.I 
by project engineers from thfl Mc(n[- 
lurgical Procoasing Ilranrli anil ft- 
contractoi-s. 

Approximately 500 rnprosonljitiveH 
of Government, industry ami nnhvr- 
sities uro expected to nttaml, iho 
meeting- is open to Govornnirnt wn- 
tractors, Government pin-Konnt'l, nii'l 
producers and UHOI-H clowsly vcfnlnl (o 
the production of aircrjifl, nnil aero- 
space systems. 

For further infoi-mtiUon rnntnct th? 
Metnlworkiiig Toclmology Kynniikifiuii 
Departmont, Air Force MaloViiif" f.:ilj- 
oratory, F. o Box 7 
46401. ' ' 




MBT-70 Project 

Test Organization 

Established 



Figure 1 



The American tost 
which will evaluate tho Joint 
btates-Pederal Republic of Oorniaiiy 
Main Battle Tank for tho l!)7Q'u has 
been established. 

The test program will bo directed 
from tho U. S. Army Test nnd Evalu- 
ation Command, Aberdeen Proving 
Ground. Md., by Colonel Jnck P. 
Libby, heading the new SyHtenis Teat 
Manager's Office, MBT-70. 

A two-mem international Proirrom 
Management Board will consist of 
Major General W. G. Dolvln, wpre- 
sentmg: U. S. interests, and Colonel 
Diving;. Helmut Sohoonefeld, tho Gor- 
man member, 

V'.A.PrototTOBB will bo routed to 
installations and activities of tho Tost 
and Evaluation Command In the conti- 
nental United States and Alaska for 
engineering an d service teats. German 
models will be tested concurrently at 
J^uropean proving grounds of tho 
German army located at TrJor, 
Munster-Lagrer and Meppen, 



October 1966 



SMTWTFS !: SMTWT F 



234567 



G 7 



23,45 
9 10 11 12 



3 M T W T F S 



1 2 3 
G 7 8 9 10 



[ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15' 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 U 15 16 17 
!16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IB 19 20 21 22 23 24' 
23 24 25. 26 27 28 29 . 27 28 29 30 . 



30 31 



Mi! OCTOBER!! 966m 



25 26 27 23 Z9 30 31 



SPEAKERS CALENDAR 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Mr. B. B. Lynn, Dep. Dh*, f Defense 
Contract Audit Agency, at the Na- 
tional Assn. of Accountants Meeting, 
Chicago, 111., Nov. 14; at the Elec- 
tronic Industries Assn. (Government 
Procurement Relations Dept.) Meet- 
ing, Colorado Springs, Colo., Nov. 17; 
at the New York State Society of 
Certified Public Accountants Meeting, 
New York City, N.Y., Nov. 30. 

Lt. Gen. H. C. Donnelly, USAF, 
Dir., Defense Atomic Support Agency, 
at World Affairs Council Meeting, 
Pittsburgh, Pa., Nov. 17. 

Maj Gen. J. B. Bestic, USAF, Dep. 
Dir. for National Military Command 
System Technical Support, Defense 
Communications Agency, at Informa- 
tion System Science and Technology 
Congress, L. G. Hanscom Field, Mass., 
Nov. 23. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Mr. William P. Durltce, Dir., Office 
of Civil Defense, at U.S. Civil De- 
fense Council Conference, Louisville, 
Ky., Oct. 24-28. 

Lt. Gen. William P. Cassidy, Chief 
of Engineers, at Ports of Philadelphia 
Day Luncheon, Philadelphia, Pa., Oct. 

28. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

RAdm. Pierre Charbonnet, Comman- 
dant, Eight Naval District, at Navy 
Day Dinner, New Iberia, La., Oct. 25. 

Hon. Paul H. Nitze, Secretary of 
the Navy, at Navy League Dinner, 
New York City, Oct. 26; at Navy Day 
Celebration, Charleston, S.C., Oct. 27. 

RAdm. J. McNair Taylor, Comman- 
dant, 12th Naval District, at Navy 
Day Lunch, Portland, Ore., Oct. 26. 

Hon. Robert H. B. Baldwin Under 
Secretary of the Navy, at Navy Day 
Luncheon, New Orleans, La. ; at 
Navy Day Dinner, Naval Air Station, 
Pensacola, Fla., Oct. 27. 

Hon. Robert A. Frosch, Asst, Secre- 
tary of the Navy (Research & Devel- 
opment) , at Industrial Conference, 
Washington, D.C., Oct. 27. 

Adm. Thomas H. Moorer, Comman- 
der-in-Chief, Atlantic Fleet, at Navy 
Day Luncheon, Philadelphia, Pa., Oct. 
27; at Navy League, Fort Lauderdale, 
Fla., Oct. 29. 

RAdm. Henry L. Miller, Chief of 
Information, at Navy Day Celebra- 



tion, Baton Rouge, La., Oct. 27; at 
Marine Underwriters Meeting, New 
York City, Nov. 17; at Navy League. 
San Antonio, Tex., Nov. 23; at Pearl 
Harbor Day Observance, Philadelphia, 
Pa., Dec. 7, 

RAdm. D. P. Smith, Commander 
Naval Air Test Center, at Navy Day 
Lunch, Jacksonville, Fla., Oct. 27. 

RAdm. J, W. Williams, Dep., Com- 
mander, Submarine Force, Atlantic 
Fleet, at Navy Day Dinner, Evanaton, 
111., Oct. 27. 

RAdm. E. J. Fahey, Commander, 
Naval Ship Systems Command, at 
Navy Day Luncheon, Cleveland, Ohio, 
Oct. 27. 

RAdm. Noel A. M. Gayler, Aast. 
Chief ol Naval Operations (Develop- 
ment), at Navy Day Dinner, Bremer- 
ton, Wash., Oct. 29. 

RAdm. Harold G. Bowcn Jr., Dep. 
Chief of Naval Operations (Develop- 
ment), at Ship Control Systems Sym- 
posium, Annapolis, Md,, Nov. 15. 

RAdm. It. Whitaker, Commanding 
Officer, Military Sea Transportation 
Service, at Navy League, Newark. 
N.J., Dec, 1. 



DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Brig. Gen. E. L. Ramme, Dir., Sup- 
ply and Services, Office of Dop. Chief 
of Staff (Systems and Logistics), at 
Defense Supply Agency Convention, 
Philadelphia, Pa., Nov. 1. 

Hon. Robert H. Charles, Asst. Sec- 
retary of the Air Force (Installations 
and Logistics), at Chamber of Com- 
merce, Granite City, 111., Nov. 3. 

Brig. Gen. E. B. Ciller, Dir., Science 
and Technology, Office of Dep. Chief 
of Staff (Research & Development), 
at Society of Aerospace Materiels and 
Processing- Engineers Meeting, San 
Diego, Calif., Nov. 10. 

Lt, Gen. W, Austin Davis, Vice 
Commander, Air Force Systems Com- 
mand, at Third Annual S. D. Heron 
Award Dinner, Wright- Patterson 
AFB, Ohio, Nov. 22. 

Brig. Gen. J. S. Bleymaier, Com- 
mander, Air Force Western Test 
Range, at American Institute of Aero- 
nautics and Astronautics Meeting, 
Boston, Mass., Nov. 29 Dec. 1. 



AF Shifts TF-39 
Engine Management 

A shift in responsibilities for man- 
agement of the TF-39 aircraft engine 
and an initial assignment for its 
maintenance and overhaul have been 
announced by the Ah* Force Logistics 
Command. 

San Antonio Air Materiel Area, 
Kelly AFB, Tex., will assume the re- 
sponsibilities of item manager and 
specialized repair activity for the TP- 
3&, which will power the C-5A heavy 
logistics aircraft. 

Oklahoma City Air Materiel Area, 
Tinker AFB, Okla., had previously 
been designated item manager. 



Maneuvering Unit 

Under Development 

Development of a Dual-purpose 
Maneuvering Unit (DMU) that can 
be worn by a space pilot or be op- 
erated by remote radio and television 
signals is now under way at the Air 
Force Systems Command's Research 
and Technology Division. 

A one-year study contract to es- 
tablish mission requirements for 1 the 
DMU during tho 1968-1972 timo 
period, prepare a design, and build 
a full-scale lightweight mocltup has 
been awarded to Boll Aerospace 
Corp. 



DEFENSE PRIME CONTRACT AWARDS 
TO SMALL BUSINESS 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

July 1965-June 1966 July 1964-June 1965 
$34,877,967 $26,112,888 



Procurement from All Firms -, 
Procurement from Small 

Business Firms 

Percent Small Business 



7,611,496 

21.8 



6,304,803 
20.3 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



21 



ma ii i vi 



ran noti M IHH 



naa vai 
utn wjj 



CU.WJW.T W IHi WRIPJ CWfS. 



CEP DIG. FINN llAHSiN 

DEP DIR (ADMIN. EVAL1VCTI, 

UOWRVIMlWlHMrilSAF 
CEP DIR (EtfC ilNFO SYSI. EFROGfRi 
DEP DIB (RESEARCH I KCMNOlOGYt, 

OONOM*1tcARIHUR 
CEP OIR liOUTMMT *5IA MATTIRSI, 

IIONARD JULUVAN IR 

Dip DIB (STRUT S SPACE SYSI. (I J (IN* 

D[P DK (IACEICAL V.lfiFAfit PtOCfAUSJ 

IHOMAS PCIIiAfflAM 

DIR. CHABKS M'lUPZIllD 
BEP(S SYSEfMS EVIL UA El ON CfOUP: 
DIR, 1>C IDS Rlia2APriE US1F 

CHV.1. ES1DIRICKS1IT? 



UltlHIMI IICIIKII H NI[I 
^OWNItllLIIIMI 

ioNiajs HWMEV ! 



IIII1I1HT HtllTllI 01 till Nil 




ISIIIItHHIUiniTCJdFllit 




(Mill 10 Will 




rilllK UIUK 




ASSTSfC. HONEIKWAS DI.IORRJS )(4 Mm 




AS5r SIC, IIIV1AHINUHS11VISIIR 


nts 


OIPi!ISEC. UC 1 B IA.PfRT, (Ji* JEW JWW 




DEPS11IC. PIIIL6C-OUIDINO 


JlMl 


DIPASSTSft 1CIVH RIGHTS 1 IWUSISIW 




Olft Cf OPiCAIIfV.5 DAJlllL J HIM III 


1U] 


RHAIIONSI. MCIWOSIOIM^ !BW Kill 




DiflECIOBATE ICkfl E1AKS 1 pOCfiV5 




LYN'JB'Bntll ' lOrt) i))l) 




DIHECIDR*E( [OR PUB! 1C IWOe.HAPK-d. 


'"" 


OEPASSrSEC(ll[AlTHtMfO C*ll, 




WIllIM! I OOfk 1 ^ 


1,'tt 


SHIRLEVCFISK, HD JEJM lll 




DtRICIORATI fQR C^V-1U>JIIV tELAri^i^ 




0(P A5SE !(t MIUIABV PfR50M;!L PCH.I. 




CM JOEL BSIIPillNi U1A 


E^f 


B^GMIAWBERG. USAF Kl^L KL&b 




DIBICIftWinOS SECUKITI RIVIE'D. 




DIP *5ST SEC IHESIRUE AFIAKil. 




CIIAKEiS WIIINUI 


Elfl 


(CII IRVIN, U5 <CB6 U! 








DIP A!ST 5|C 1WANPOTIR (tflNNIND I 








RfStJBCJI), RQlKOWOlPOB! )DK4 ltt 










October 



1 




1 




1 


inura i SEE mm n MIHKI 

WHNIOIIII 

. HGN KOSffll N ANIilOHY 1FSM "HI 

SEdCQMH] ISKOR ]! iliii 

stc FWi*ciwiN!SYSiiws nt- 
CIVFLOPWF.TJ. GwsEROHJisi '>BS >u 
SEC rvANAciyjui JAIU raw 




IHISTiLHT HdlTtlt 01 t [FID IE 
IHtlilltTIOH! t ICC! II Hi 
ASSFSFC. HDMPAUl RIGNATLUS IIM SHH 

FJEPA5SI SIC. CKMVCIBW JtSB JIM 
FtfPASS! SEC lAT[fil[LfFQUIR[l.'.ENISP 
PAUUIRIUY ijlil 1JIS1 
Of P A55I SIC ILOCISTICS SERVICES! 

RoBfflicrooE JI&H mtt 

BiPASiT SEC IPROCURIWMI 
JOHfJMM*L(OY HIM JS171 




MIIIIIKI iitirmir si BEIIKE 
id [INKI MM uc it KIT muni 

SSI SEC. HON JOHN I f,'A*ljCM10(d SB J4IS1 
DICASitSIt, KMNStnilHOaHi ll) WU 

DIP, of wiLiwiiy MSLSH(. 

VIALUIIIiBCWINZLISH F 1JMI 
C(P 1SSI SIC lABMi 1 tHlCiCa/ISOtl, 
MIHUR W 6*PBtB 4(!1? J5146 
lifP Mil SfCIIFlTifiNAHOWL LOGISTICS 

K1CWI*1IONSI. 






IBWARD J SHSRIOAN illW Ulil 

DEP ASSI sic [EQUIP MINI t RHOmfSii, 

G!ORGf f IOLJCH lira JBSl 
0P AS51 SiC (FAMILY HOUSMGI 
JOHN 1 RIF.D )|,H 1ISW 

OFF. ECONOMIC ADJ. D ( BRADFORD j[m |$|ij 
111 Ft. 1ECH DAT* 1 STAIIO POL 
COlOGRIFFmHACI) Po.T.jinij FJ} )SS 




DFPASSIHCUFBHA.WiSTIFfliHiMiSPHlFii: 
(fORCIC'UMLITAFIVRIIillTSI. 
VnillSMillNO CO ItJM 
CIPASSISEC FF*B L1SIIBN AfFHIBSI !)f 1130F 
tiP MSI SIC I*B EASTiB'll SOUTH 
5I>II.(FAIR5I, 
TMNSlNDVl MMPtS JiEU 'Wl 
CEP MSI S[C (KA','4 l,u & LOftlH laAliTIC 
till, in 5 1. FRF1EBICK 1 VrtlE CO I1I9I 



1 




1 




1 


IUIIUE n(im 01 PIUXII 
iilliMi imusii 




IS I HI till (OUHIEl 01 THE HmTUlHI OF CIIEME 
CUERAL COUNSEL. ltt S)l 

DEPUIY&EMRlLCOUWfl, 




Mimm to mi ucuui) 

MONK INIIG1 
ASSEIOEHf SEC. HI07I MM 


FRiDSIIOFFMN !A(B 5QIII 
1 SIC ICENERIl PURPOSE PBOf.RAMSl, 








lilt ASST. CO. C f BY(f S, UiJlF illOtl Till! 
MIIASS1. COLBRSY, USA 1I10I1 1J1W 












I 5 ISfSBUFia ANALYSIS). 
IllmiO ASIIEfi If SI! HMI 

4 INinilSiNCF, 

uEBSiflio iiNiNcioN lent wai 








lIIItUHIDIHl [ItTUt 

H tern ti in limit) 

AS SI Id [Hi StC 
IACK L SIEMPIER J[J I6NI 







Mil* IE sum* tciHCt 




pinitMut OF im >iMr 






t-FUllllHI Cl THI Kill 




CI.PAIIIIFMT 01 (HI 111 'OKI 


VI 




amltingil, d, JMB 




SECBETABYOFEHEAfiMr, 




SEC 


HAS* OF III! NAVY. ItON PAUL II Jill!E tlJID HI I 




SICREIIBI OF THE AIRIOB.CI. 






Cin IT on Sill ion, Aliurwm. Vi 




IION STAMfY R BiSQR lifl! Ht\\ 




UNO 


RSICRdAKf. MMROBEFtl II B BALDWIN lil.'J S]l 1 




MONHAROLIHSSCFiVS "") ' i! 


^CMj ijjjj] 








Ul DFBSICRFIABI, MON DAVID iWCIFFIfil Hill Mill 




ASFJ 


ill. (IQflf.RAF.l'jCeAKrHfil.Ll'l Al-'l 11 6H 1- 




USDERSK, HOHIlOflM*lS PALA l'l lltel 


'CW 1UU 




DIKECIOD 
VIAIMLYIESCUSN 1AI50 lllll 




15* RtO P. JEJW Wl 
AS* fM). HON VI FJRW5TIR KOPP !lJ >!?'! 




ASN IWI ItONChltVIES IRA IRQ J f t- 
ASMRF.O), IIUMJiOSEBlAIBDiCH 4[1W i t- 




AflR4Dl HON*lIXAtl)E*IHWX W* 14551 
MAFIIUI. HON ROBERT HCHASKi " !i ' fl ""' 


"Hi Ml?) 
"Ill am 




MIWY FJ MCIOB. 
WO i C HECLUND. USAF 1AIW till) 
SPEC AS51 FOX PUB IMO. 1UGIF.EF HARE i*!l! SII35 
ASSTDIR, PLAliS, PROC9AMS I SVSKMS, 
liVCWDODRC'iV W VAUCHAN USA 3Adft dl^FL 




ASA 1(11. lltHBOaiREABRMUS )(C 5?7i4 
Cl PUBINFO. J.VCKEIIIUWARE !( HS 

CM if OF ST*FF, CfN MAfiftD K JOI F1SON )ftt! S 
VCS C.FrlCREI&FIT^A AFJRA.MS JR 1E(iS SOI^ 




CM ,FO. FIIAII[I.RYlF.llllfS H1 1J) 1 
CMFSV*lflESlABC(l. BH JOIH1 HI VFJOU M HUH til \ 
CO', F-tRCIIFB IION CIIAV1ES ' BllftO 1IIJ1 !!Ui 
MR. F OF Ml IPIIO, CAP1 JlW.LS M BROOANSEFII HBI 
DIB OIF OF N*Y*L PlIBftSUM t OIL SILA1I 




ASAUFMH. HflULIONAim MARKS, JH 'I'" "" 
ITiPlir.OFR SICllMERSMIOfllLAFIAIRSI, 
PHIIIPFHILBER1 9M SUJ-I 
OIB, INFO USl B IIBAI1I* JDIJJ IOH61 
FJIIJ Si-ACESYSTH'S. (IS fWEi 1 1 5IIWI 1C IO IStJl 






HP OIR. CONWACI ADM SffiVICES, ' 
1VO JOHN AHJSIIORN, USA SM 8W1 




DCS OPS, LJGVF.BNQNP HOCK JEW S?*M 

OCSPIR, 110 JAMES KKOOlWUa lEIJi 1WOJ 




CNO 


HtSERVES, CDHORSUiriBFIHlllunBEWJ M*J 
0'J CAVIDLfi'iOD'lAlD dEUO !MW 




Din. vapnoc)iA.woFrict, 

WJSIUFtSYtWANS 1DWF WBI 






IIIC OlStCIORAIE. SUPPLY OPEBAEIONS. 




CCSHOfi, IIGLAViliiNCFIllrJCOm JR MttQ "IDi 




DCW 












BIA IW BOTTOMS. USN <PMS !IIOI 
(IfCOlBECIOBAir, PBOCUBEVMt PHO- 
DUCTION. CaRllEt. USAf '!!!)! iltOI 




caMPIROLltS. tlCFifiDIWN-D JCHSARIK )A1 !ID 
Cl (FOf B50, LfGAUSIINlV BE1ES )M1I KIBi 
C5FOS, LIC I*MIS H POU )l*! HIFS 




KNOIDEVI. HIAH*RDCBWf.N JR SCIIO I5il( 
DfHOIEOlB VI* JOHNItCDUilH. HW !Iil 
DCUO I10W, VIA 101 EN5EV etfc M1H 




CF<IF OF SIAFI. AIR FO"Cf 
Clld JOHN P FMQ'AiL.l ' "* 
VlCECHlIf Of SIFF. 






IIIC DIRECTORATE, KCU'llCAl t LOGISTICS 
SERVICES. 
FJIC WIlllAM 1 HAMRICK, USAI iliO t\l>\ 




Col IMS, LFOftlLLIAMf CA5SIOY Tinja IUW 5-K3 
CoF HAW, WCWILUAMCIUNIKf Nil til 111 !16 
10 MIC JAMIS * BICMABOSWI III SO An 1(1 11833 
PI, C, WO CARL C TURNER Mnl,l~ [Oil 0!1M 




DChO WINRI, VIA BiNFOICl I SIMK'JS l> iHltl SU 
WiOtfl.Pt, VIA ANOKfil'^BUCKSONlR W HW 
EIIR. NAV* PROG PMNN INC. Vi*[ PIIOLI.1IS 6ll )MM 

uil r q I^IDIOI tn^fiO TI^Kl 




DCVBiO, ltd JOSEPH RHOlZPPlt 4HM ICrtP 
OCSJFIR. IH **! 
OCSISYS ( IOC UOlUCtMAS P CtRBIlt '" 1HH 
DCSIF-SO. UCKIIIUFCCMPICW 'SID.'O 1-*WI 






DIK 


inMf p*hjr* noi rn eiA rJr>prr NlulllDm^J S?J^1 




CWPlRai-iS. UC IWXSWEBflfLL flllfC F11M 












C<ll(l, NAl-AlMAIFRIAI/Vi'H HCAl^NlIN FWftlD (SHU 
COFJ. NAV*IRSYSCO.. flr* AUfNH 5.HIM UVtXU BW 
COX, FIAVIIECSYSCOM, R/A 10SWH F RICE IM KC* (IK1 
CUR. FIAVSllirSYlCOM. FUAtCOTAFiD JFAIIVMKWW Ottt 




INS N. I1CCJ.ENWUA51IN WM I4I1! 
SURHOHEEK, UC SICSIAHB BOtlAhhaN !* ClI tW 
USAF SCIIMIIIC A1H BO. II ilLVK 1DLDU Mill 




1 


j.m'^ 




joiHLSKaniaiAL 


CBOUF*, 




SfCREIARY. 1CS. 








BFAARIMURRCRilllA ILlun B WIJ t 








RtALBVASfV. USD !(WS mCO 






COR 


FIAV5UPSY5CO.M. P.'A H 1 GdCBTRG NV1TO4 tM. f 




IDS 


i JrJfa 








CDB 


FJAVrACfNSCO.". SI* A C HUSMND TtOAnftM 10411 








DIRFCFOfiATf OF *DMINIS[P,ATHI| 5IRVIMS 






COB 


MS IS, VIA CIVI. 1 ! B dONAHO T-! I-XU t*J' 














C5S 


OIOFUABIWCOSfS. 




101 


4 lllfil 


CM RFC FOR, 








CFIH'i'M CKllllt JB A* iU UHO 








CCl J MllllKIN R USA !D14I MBJI 






its 


IPSP1, llOtlEhFUW [USE I'R A* NM ll 
















IBD4SI, BIO F I ANDEFESOI ** IKK 4i]ll 




* g ^V 


F-3JL 


SPJCIALMSIiUITFORHIIITARV 






nf f 


IIIDL wrj-. a jivurrnrnw J* nil JIW1 




MM 


wsi 


SPfCIAl ASSISTANT. 






OIFIOF IlifO. eiHFIMSBlT'ioN A* )j iWJ 




> 


&. 
s i ai 


(.<JGF.COJCHF.RRiR, USA 1(84! !H?S 




^Washington personnel only 








1 




1 




eiEiHti no me surroiE KFKCI 




til EH II CONHUIt (tlFONI MINCI 










DIRCCEOR, 




. IBI^a ]?, Hnil Strvltf Ctnl-ir, AM.vJ 




OIRICFOS, 








1 GIIC DONNELLY. USAF WS 141 IS 




Soulri jj'uil IWuic Ron, Irllnjin.ni 




ntc, coi Fiocfitiii. USAF Kt wwt 








EXECUEIVi WF1CFB. 




DIRECTOR. 






AUOI1. IW4 






COL JE KlWJLANpUaA 1B663 S3338 




UG ALFRED DSEAHBIRD. US* l> 
CHIEF OFSMFF, 












vjcvE SMiiii, USAF tin n s? 





Defense Industry Bulletin 




MEETINGS AND SYMPOSIA 



OCTOBER 

Colloquium on the Photographic In- 
teraction Between Radiation and Mat- 
ter, Oct. 26-27. at Washington, B.C. 
Co-sponsors: Air Force Office of Scien- 
tific Research and the Society of 
Photographic Scientists and Engi- 
r \ C ntact: Dr. Amos G. Homey 
(SRC), Air Force Office of Scientific 
Research, Washington, B.C. 20333. 
{Area Code 202) OXford 6-8706. 

NOVEMBER 

26th Anniversary Symposium on 
Personnel Research and System Ad- 
vancement, Nov. 1-3, at San Antonio, 
lex. Sponsors: Personnel Research 
Laboratory and Southwest Research 
Institute. Contact: Jack Barman, 
Southwest Research Institute, San 
Antonio, Tex. (Area Code 512) 0V 



*r -; - , ontro1 s y ste m Symposia, 
Nov. 16-17, at Annapolis, Md. Spon- 
sor: U.S. Navy Marine Engineering 
Laboratory. Contact: Walter J. Blum- 
?ft Steering Committee Chairman, 
y SN Marine Engineering Laboratory, 
Annapolis, Md. (Area Code 301) 
268-7711, ext. 8670. 

Fif f th 6; n " ual Symposium on 
Physics of Failure in Electronics, Nov 
16-18, at Columbus, Ohio. Co-Spon- 
sors: Battelle Memorial Institute and 
the Rome Air Development Center. 
Contact: Joseph Schramp (EMERP), 
Rome Air Development Center, Grif- 
flss, AFB, N.Y. 13442. 

Third Annual Failure Analysis 
Seminar, Nov. 17-18, at the NASA 
Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, 
Tex. Co-sponsors: Texas Chapter of 
?5 American Society for Metals and 
NASA Manned Space Center. Con- 
tact: Dr. David E. Hartman, Houston 
Research Institute, Inc., 6001 Gulf 
Freeway, Houston, Tex. 77023. (Area 
Code 713) 928-5001. 

Third Congress on Information Sys- 
tems Science and Technology. Nov. 
21-22, at Buck Hill Falls, Pa. Co- 
?P n j? ors: Electronic Systems Div., 
(AFSC), and Mitre Corp, Contact: 
Col. C. A, Laustrup (ESRC), Project 
^Jncer, Electronic Systems Div., 
i SC K Ll Gt Han scom Field, Mass. 
01731. (Area Code 617) 271-4627. 

Symposium on the Structure of Sur- 
faces, date undetermined, at Durham. 
N.C. Sponsor: Army Research Office- 
Durham. Contact: Dr. H. M. Davis, 
Dir., Metallurgy and Ceramics Div., 
Army Research Ofiice-Durham, Box 
CM, Duke Station. Durham, N.C. 
27706. (Area Code 919), 286-2286, ext. 
31. 



24 



DECEMBER 

15th Annual Wire & Cable Sympo- 
sium, Dec. 7-9, at Atlantic City, N.J. 
Sponsor: Army Electronics Command. 
Contact: Milton Tenzer, Electronic 
Parts and Materials Div., Electronics 
Components Laboratory, Army Elec- 
tronics Command, Fort Monmouth, 
N.J. 07703. (Area Code 201) 635-1834. 

Fourth Symposium on Unconven- 
tional Inertial Sensors, Dec. 6-7, at the 
Department of State Auditorium, 
Washington, B.C. Sponsors: Naval 
Air Systems/Ordnance Systems Com- 
mands ', Research & Technology Div., 
(AFSC), and the Institute of Naviga- 
tion. Contact: Capt. Ross E. Freeman, 
USN (Ret), Executive Dir., Institute 
of Navigation, Suite 912, 711 14th St., 



N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005. (Am 
Code 202) 783-3296. 

American Ordnance Assn. SympO' 
sium on the Fabrication and Utilize 
tion of Lightweight Armor, (Claa. 
sified) Dee. 13-14, at the Arms 
1 ank-Automotive Center, Warren 
Mich. Sponsor: American Ordnance 
Assn. Contact: Director for Advisorj 
Service, American Ordnance Assn., 
Transportation Building, Washington, 
D.C. 20006. 

First Nuclear Criticality Safety Na- 
tional Topical Meeting, Dec. 13-15, at 
Las Vegas, Nev. Sponsors: American 
Nuclear Society and organizations and 
contractors of the Atomic Energy 
Commission, NASA and the Air 
Force. Contact: A. J. Smith, Nuclear 
Reactor Safety Group (WLAS-1), Air 
Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtlnnd 
AFB, N.M. 87117. 



SAJMS 

(Continued from Page IS) 

indicate what and where the problems 
are.) 

The contractor will plan his cost 
and schedule accomplishment up- 
wards within his own organization, 
i.e., beginning at the level of first 
line supervision. 

The acceptance of this approach 
will foster an environment in which 
Government and industry can better 
resolve the issue of the management 
interface where major Defense pro- 
grams of critical consequence ai'e con- 
cerned. The essential nature of rela- 
tionships and responsibilities in these 
matters has yet to be resolved. What 
is basic in deciding on an acceptable 
arrangement is that there be good 
visibility and clear communication in 
those programs in which contract 
completion is a matter of vital con- 
cern. 

The visibility promoted through 
the specification approach will be pro- 
vided under the following conditions : 

No major changes should be re- 
quired to the contractor's existing 
work authorization, budgeting and ac- 
counting systems. 

Common terms and report for- 
mats .will be employed to maximize 
understanding. 

Problem areas can be identified in 



detail by element of cost and organi- 
zational responsibility. 

* A contractor may change and im- 
prove the details of his internal con- 
trol system so long as he continues 
to meet the basic criteria. 

* Flexibility in accounting for con- 
tingencies will communicate better 
information for management. 

* The accomplishment of technical 
(product) performance goals can bo 
related to the information frame- 
work for recording cost and schedule 
accomplishment. 

While current development of the 
standard DOD specification is being 
canned on within OSD, a separate 
effort in the same direction is being 
implemented by the Air Force Sys- 
tems Command (AFSC) procurement 
activities. The OSD effort is currently 
undergoing industry coordination and 
will undoubtedly supersede any indi- 
vidual Service planning and control 
system specifications or procedures 
after the coordination process is com- 
pleted. In view of some evidence of 
confusion about the source of docu- 
ments which have been developed in 
this subject area, draft or discussion 
materials circulated during the de- 
velopment process should be examined 
to distinguish the DOD draft version 
of the specification from that orig- 
inated within the Air Force by AFSC. 

October 1966 




Address by Hon. Robert A. Froacli, 
Asst. Secretory of the Navy (Re- 
search and Development) , at the In- 
stitute of Eleatrica.1 and Electronic 
Engineers Ocean Electronics Sympo- 
sium, Honolulu, Hawaii, Aug. 89,1966. 




Hon. Robert A. Frosch 

National Oceanographic 
Program 



It la customary in discussing ocean- 
ography to point out, first, its vital 
Importance to our national defense, a 
fact which certainly cannot be ex- 
aggerated and, second, to catalog the 
fabulous wealth that lies in the sea 
wealth in the form of minerals and 
dhemicals that will soon be in short 
supply on land and wealth in the form 
of food and fresh water for an al- 
ready protein-starved and water- 
starved world. 

Because these facts are known to 
most of you here, I will not elaborate 
on. them, 

Instead I would like to take a few 
minutes to invite your attention to 
very recent developments which will 
have a profound and almost immediate 
effect on the whole field of ocean- 



ography, both military and non-mili- 
tary. 

The first is the Marine Resources 
and. Engineering Development Act of 
1966 which President Johnson signed 
into law on the 17th of June, 

We are fortunate in having in the 
Congress at this point in our history 
a number of perceptive congressmen 
who have taken the time to make a 
thorough study of oceanography and 
its importance to the national welfare. 
This law is the result of careful con- 
sideration and intelligent compromise 
on the part of these gentlemen. 

Though the dollar expenditures will 
probably not be the same, this law 
will escalate the national oceano- 
graphic program to the same level of 
public interest and awareness as ac- 
crued to the space program from the 
National Space Act of 1968. 

Oceanography is defined in many 
ways depending upon the individual 
discussing the subject. The law has 
adopted the board view, prevalent in 
Congress and in industry, that ocean- 
ography connotes far more than scien- 
tific study. In this law the term, 
marine science, is applied to ocean- 
ographic and scientific endeavors and 
discipline as well as engineering and 
technology in and with relation to 
the marine environment (marine en- 
vironment including the oceans and 
the Great Lakes as well as their boun- 
dries) , 

The law sets up a National Council 
on Marine Resource and Engineering 
Development to be headed by the Vice 
President of the United States and 
made up of cabinet members and 
agency heads with a 1 major statutory 
interest in the field. 1 was privileged 
to attend the first meeting of this 
national council less than two weeks 
ago. 

It is certainly obvious to all of us 
who attended this first meeting that 
the Vice President has had a long 
standing personal interest in oceanog- 
raphy, and intends to devote whatever 
personal time is needed to carry out 
this aspect of his duties. I can assure 
you that this administration is taking 
the challenge of ocean exploration 



most seriously. Although the life 
this national council is limited to 
period of about 22 months, it has 
statutory set of purposes "to develc 
encourage, and maintain a coordinate 
comprehensive, and long range n 
tional program in marine sciences f 
the benefit of mankind." It is t] 
policy of this administration to u 
the council as a policy-making body 
expand scientific understanding of tl 
oceans, to accelerate the developnie 
of marine resources, and to establii 
an engineei'ing capability to reali 
the full potential of the oceans in co 
tributing to our national security ai 
well being. 

The act requires the council to pi 
pare an annual report on the Nation 
Oceanographic Program for the PI-E 
ident to transmit to the Congress. T 
report will describe Federal mul 
agency programs, evaluate these $ 
tivities, and will set forth recoi 
mende'd funding for all participate 
agencies during fche succeeding fisc 
year. 

This council's other responsibiliti 
are: 

To advise and assist the Preside 
in an annual review of Federal pi 
grams, surveys of such activities a: 
steps to coordinate the activities 
all agencies. 

To develop long range poli 
studies of the potential benefits of t 
oceans to the U. S. economy, securil 
health and welfare, including a 1 stu< 
explicitly aimed at international leg 
problems. 

To evaluate and interpret t 
study report to be developed by t 
citizens' commission before it is trar 
mitted to the President. 

To coordinate a program of intt 
national cooperation in work pursua 
to marine science activities. 

Dr. Ed Wenk was appointed by t 
President as the new executive seci 
tary to the council and was sworn 
by fche Vice President at the fii 
national council meeting. He will 
the Vice President's right hand m 
for matters under the jurisdiction 
the national council. Dr. Wenk vv 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



formerly Chief of Congress' Science 
Policy Research Staff and the Legis- 
lative Reference Service of the Li- 
brary of Congress, and before that 
Executive Secretary of the Federal 
Council for Science and Technology. 
He has made major personal contri- 
butions to the design and engineering 1 
of deep submersibles. 

The law further empowers the Pres- 
ident to appoint a commission on 
marine sciences, engineering and re- 
sources to be composed of 16 members 
from industry, universities and ma- 
raine laboratories as well as the Fed- 
eral and state governments. This 
citizens' commission is given up to 
18 months to study and to recommend 
to the President of the United States 
and Congress an overall plan for pres- 
ent and future needs. The President 
expects to announce appointments to 
this commission within the next few 
weeks. 

As chairman of the Interagency 
Committee on Oceanography, I have 
been directed by Dr. Horning, the 
President's Science Advisor and Chair- 
man of the Federal Council for Science 
and Technology, to cooperate in every 
manner with the national council. 

In summary, we now have a na- 
tional policy council on oceanography 
at the very highest level in Govern- 
ment chaired by the Vice President 
of the United States. Under the um- 
brella of this council, the Interagency 
Committee on Oceanography (ICO) 
will discharge its responsibilities and 
the staff of the ICO will completely 
support the work of the council. We 
hope that arrangements can be made 
so that the council can call on the 
citizens' commission or Its individual 
members and staff, as a group of ex- 
perts in and out of Government, to 
act as advisers to this national coun- 
cil. Thus we will have everyone in the 
Federal Government engaged in 
oceanography pulling together under 
the policy direction of the Vice Pres- 
ident to come up with recommenda- 
tions to the President of the United 
States to carry out the statutory set 
of purposes under this new act. 

Now, I don't want to second-guess 
the findings of a commission that is 
yet to be appointed and a policy coun- 
cil that has just met for the first time, 
but I do think that a long shadow 'has 
been cast toward the future by the 
report of the Panel on Oceanography 
of the President's Science Advisory 
Committee (PSAO). 

26 



The report is entitled "Effective 
Use of the Sea" and is available from 
the Superintendent of Documents at 
the Government Printing Office for 
60 cents. You couldn't make a better 
investment perhaps most of you have 
already made your investment. You 
don't have to agree with everything 
in it (and, parenthetically, I have 
found no one who does) to realize that 
it is a significant report, which is 
going to affect the shape of things to 
come in oceanography. 

The PSAC report defines ocean- 
ography as all "activities within the 
ocean that have significant scientific 
or technological content." This defini- 
nition is in keeping with the broad 
popular meaning given to ocean- 
ography over the past few years. 

The title, "Effective Use of the 
Sea," comes from the recommendation 
that the national objective of our 
ocean program should be "effective 
use of the sea by man for all pur- 
poses currently considered for the ter- 
restial environment." 

An attempt to answer the question, 
"What is the proper role of the Fed- 
eral Government in oceanography?" 
is indicated by their statement that 
"division of effort among Government, 
industry, and universities appropriate 
to land-based activities is advisable 
for the oceans and that the Federal 
Government should not preempt these 
activities to the extent it has, for ex- 
ample, in space." 

Assigning highest priority to those 
efforts in oceanography that deal 
with national security, the report dis- 
cusses the increasing need for the 
Navy to be prepared to defend the 
developing interest in all depths of 
the ocean, and to provide for the 
continuing projection of U. S. power 
on and under the oceans in an era 
of increasing sophistication in the use 
of the seas. This leads the report to 
recommend expansion of Navy capa- 
bilities which will permit operation 
anywhere within the oceans at any 
time. As you know, the Navy has 
under way a Deep Submergence Sys- 
tems Project including Man-in-the-Sea. 
This report further asserts that this 
effort as presently constituted is in- 
sufficient if the Navy is to meet its 
goals in a reasonable time period. 

The report recommends assignment 
of Federal program responsibilities 
for Man-in-the-Sea and undersea 
technology to the Navy. Thoughts and 



plans are relatively inexpensive. To 
put them into effect costs money. As s; 
the result of a study which proposed 
a plan for the Navy's future role in 
undersea technology, the Navy haa in- 
cluded a new line item in the FY 
1968 budget request, entitled "Deep 
Ocean Technology." 

I fully support the Chief of Naval 
Operations in his statement before 
the Navy League that the Navy will 
require improved capabilities in its 
undersea strategic forces, anti- 
submarine warfare forces, as well as 
the ability to perform undersea search 
and recovery operations. Improvement 
of the Navy's capabilities in these 
areas depends largely on our national 
ability to discover and exploit now 
knowledge in ocean science and our 
success in developing new and rele- 
vant ocean technology. 

We have seen a new horizon emerg- 
ing, centering on our capability to 
engineer the oceans. We now face 
problems attendant upon our ability 
to explore the oceans, to exploit the 
oceans, and to occupy portions of the 
oceans' bottom. 

I join the Secretary of the Navy, 
who for years has been convinced that 
the general area of ocean exploration 
and exploitation offers a challenge 
just as great as that posed by the 
current exploration of outer space, 
and that it will ultimately require a 
national effort on a comparable scale, 

Our oceanographic programs are 
dramatic. They have captured the 
imagination of the public, foreign and 
domestic. To say the least, they are 
interesting, to you and to all engi- 
neers and scientists. 

I urge you to keep informed on 
these programs and national develop- 
ments in oceanography and to pre- 
pare to work with us on the impor- 
tant and fascinating problems in this 
exciting field. It should be clear that 
while the Navy will lead in ocean 
technology, it will really be a na- 
tional effort, a corporate endeavor: 
science, industry, and the Navy. 

In summary, the PSAC oceanog- 
raphy report recommends that the 
nation's oceanographic activities be 
supported by the Navy "in discharg- 
ing its mission of national security ** 
through its laboratories and industry 
and through the Office of Naval He- 
search support of civilian institutions, 

October 1966 



as well as by its supporting role in 
I** the development of undersea tech- 
nology and provision of national test 
facilities." 

In the civilian sector the report 
deals at length with the role of 
oceanography in facilitating the un- 
derwater recovery of oil and minerals, 
in providing fish protein and tech- 
nology for a protein-starved world 
and with many other subjects such 
as water pollution, conversion of salt 
water to fresh, the role of the oceans 
in world weather. 

The specific recommendations as- 
| signed the highest priority in the 
civilian sector to its development of 
food resources and the development of 
the capability for environmental 
prediction. The development of coastal 
regions for recreation and commerce 
were assigned a very high priority 
and the development of a modern 
hydrographic survey technology was 
assigned a high priority. 

The establishment of marine study 
centers; marine wilderness preserves; 
deep sea and tropical laboratories and 
facilities for specialized marine 
studies ; and a national center for 
collection, maintenance and distribu- 
tion of living marine organisms are 
recommended in the report. 

Since oceanography has progressed 
rapidly and many clearly identifiable 
problems exist, the report recommends 
a shift away from broad ocean sur- 
veys to solutions of specific problems, 
The need for oceanographers to evolve 
some fairly elaborate measuring 
arrays, with limited regions heavily 
instrumented, led to the recommenda- 
tion for a step-by-step buoy program. 

In discussing oceanographic re- 
l search the report recommends that 
oceanographic research ships be sepa- 
rately funded as a block, and be 
grouped generally into regional fleets 
of reasonable aize. 

The major organizational recom- 
mendation would combine the Envi- 
ronmental Sciences Services Admin- 
istration, Geological Survey, Bureau 
of Commercial Fisheries, and oceano- 
graphic activities of the Coast Guard 
and the Bureau of Mines In a single 
agency. This new agency would sup- 
port the national effort by manage- 
* ment of environment and ocean re- 
sources and providing description and 
prediction services through a balanced 
program of direct participation and 
support of industry and universities. 



At the request of the President, 
each Federal agency is considering 
the recommendations contained in 
"Effective Use of the Sea." The ICO 
is now in the process of examining 
the implications of these recommenda- 
tions and the Vice President regards 
the analysis of the PSAC report as 
one of his council's priority assign- 
ments, and expects to utilize the next 
council meeting for this purpose. In 
his charge to the Vice President, the 
President requested the National Ma- 
rine Council to carefully study the 
many recommendations of the report 
and to consider these proposals in de- 
veloping suggestions for the Presi- 
dent for 19C8. 

At this time I can spealc only for 
the Navy. Budgets permitting, the 
Navy intends to follow its recom- 
mendations. In the field of oceanog- 
raphy we feel an obligation to the 
entire nation. Almost every bit of 
oceanographic information gathered 
is not only of use to the Navy, but 
also to others in the oceanographic 
community. For instance, tho work 
we do on sonar can be used to develop 
methods for studying the migratory 
habits of fish. 

It is obvious that while pursuing 
military objectives, the Navy lias an 
obligation to the national interest in 
ocean technology. We would like to 
see Navy dollars do double duty in 
supporting the civilian sector. In addi- 
tion, the Navy accepts the responsi- 
bility for helping to develop the na- 
tional undersea technology needed for 
effective use of the sea in the mili- 
tary, economic, social and political 
sense. This, again, must be a corpo- 
rate venture: a scicnce-industry-Navy 
team. 

To be certain that the Navy's por- 
tion of the National Qceanographic 
Program budget is carefully and wise- 
ly invested, the Secretary of the Navy 
and the Chief of Naval Operations 
have completed taking another long, 
hard look at the entire Navy ocean- 
ographic program. They have thought 
in terms of a m'ore centralized au- 
thority to give even a better focus to 
the entire Navy program in ocean- 
ography and related efforts. 

The Secretary of the Navy, the 
Honorable Paul Nitze, has taken an 
action that will not only strengthen 
the Navy's oceanographic program 
but increase the Navy's ability to 



cooperate with all other agencies in- 
volved in our national ocean ographic 
effort. 

Effective immediately, the Secre- 
tary has established a new office of 
the Oceanographer of the Navy and 
invested it with the necessary ex- 
panded authority to provide central- 
ized direction of all the Navy's 
occanographic activities. 

The new office wilt be headed by 
Rear Admiral O. D. Waters, Jr., who 
has been serving in the more limited 
position previously designated as 
Oceanographer of the Navy and also 
as Commander of the U. S. Naval 
Oceanographic Office, 

Since the Secretary's instruction Is 
not long and since it is written in the 
plain English for which he is noted, I 
will quote it to you in its entirety: 

"This instruction defines the Na- 
val Oceanographic Program, estab- 
lishes an Office of the Oceanographer 
of the Navy, and prescribes the 
mission of the Oceanographer of 
the Navy. 

"The Naval Oceanographic Pro- 
gram encompasses that body of 
science, technology, engineering, op- 
erations, and the personnel and 
facilities associated with each, 
which is essential primarily to ex- 
plore and to lay the basis for ex- 
ploration of the ocean and its 
boundaries for Naval applications 
to enhance security and support 
other national objectives. 

"The mission of the Oceanogra- 
pher of the Navy is to act as tho 
Naval Occanogrnpliic Program Di- 
rector for the Chief of Naval 
Operations, under the policy direc- 
tion of the Secretary of the Navy, 
through the Assistant Secretary of 
the Navy (Research ami Develop- 
ment), and to exercise centralized! 
authority, direction ant! control, in- 
cluding control of resources, in order 
to insure an integrated and effective 
Naval Oceanographtc Program. 

"In carrying out hia assigned re- 
sponsibilities, the Oceanographer of 
the Navy is authorized to issue di- 
rectives, management plans, re- 
quirements, tasks, instructions, and 
to allocate resources for the Secre- 
tary of the Navy and the Chief of 
Naval Operations* 

"The Chief of Naval Research is 
assigned additional responsibility as 
Assistant Oceanographer of the 
Navy for Ocean Science. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



27 



"The Chief of Naval Material, 
with approval of the CNO, has as- 
signed the Deputy Chief of Naval 
Material (Development) additional 
responsibility as Assistant Oceanog- 
rapher of the Navy for Ocean Engi- 
neering and Development. 

"With the approval of the CNO, 
the Oceanographer of the Navy will 
designate an Assistant Oceanogra- 
pher of the Navy for Oceanographic 
Operations. Pending this designa- 
tion, the relationships of the Ocean- 
ographer of the Navy and the U. S. 
Naval Oceanographic Office remain 
as at present. 

"The Oceanographer of the Navy 
shall budget, justify, and admin- 
ister all funds allocated to the 
Naval Oceanographic Program as 
required for implementation of the 
program, shall insure that adequate 
funds are budgeted by activities of 
the Navy Department for support 
of the program; and shall develop 
and maintain a comprehensive 
budget documented for presentation 
to higher executive authorities and 
Congressional Committees. 

"All national facilities, centers, 
and missions of the National Ocean- 
ographic Program assigned to the 
Department of the Navy will be 
managed and administered by the 
Oceanographer of the Navy. 

"The Office of the Oceanographer 
of the Navy is hereby established 
directly under the Chief of Naval 
Operations. 

"The Oceanographer of the Navy, 
under the Chief of Naval Opera- 
tions, shall command the Office of 
the Oceanographer of the Navy. 

"The Chief of Naval Operations 
shall issue the necessary directives 
to implement the provisions of this 
Instruction." 

That is the end of the Secretary's 
instruction. Its unequivocal language 
leaves no doubt that the Navy views 
its work in oceanography as a major 
portion of its effort to maintain the 
defense of the nation at sea, and 
that it is organizing its resources to 
make a major contribution to the 
national effort; a team effort among 
the academic community, industiy, 
state and Federal agencies sharing 
the responsibility to work together 
under the leadership of the President 
and Vice President of the United 
States. 

28 



Address by Lt. Gen. H. C. Donnelly, 
USAF, Dir., Defense Atomic Support 
Agency, at Rotary Club Meeting, Al- 
buquerque, N. M,, Sept. 29, 1966. 




Lt. Gen. H. C. Donnelly, USAP 



The Frontier of Technology 

The character of technological 
progress is CHANGE. In fact, the 
one thing that is constant in life 
today is CHANGE. We have seen 
many changes in our lifetime, but 
these are only a 1 prelude to what the 
future holds'. The changes to come 
could be the most significant ever 
faced in the history of man. I hope 
that we can be farsighted enough to 
take the right kind of action as these 
changes occur. 

Farsightedness today is a very de- 
sirable characteristic; and speaking 
of farsightedness reminds me of the 
little girl whose father took her to the 
zoo to see all the wild animals. On 
viewing the lion pacing back and 
forth in his cage, the little girl looked 
troubled, and her dad asked her what 
was the matter, "Daddy/' she replied, 
"If that lion gets out of his cage and 
eats you up, what bus do I take 
home?" That's being farsighted! 

There are many categories of 
change about which we have to be far- 
sighted. The population explosion, 
the role of computers, and a host of 
other matters warrant our attention; 
but since I'm in the nuclear business, 
I'm going to talk mainly about the 
changes that have and will come to 
to us through nuclear technology. 

My association with nuclear tech- 
nology has been fixed primarily in the 
weapons area. The potential of nu- 



clear energy, however, by no 
begins nor ends with defense. 
frontier that opened up with the dis- 
covery of fission is as broad and full 
as our scientific curiosity wills it, But 
nuclear weapons have captured the 
lion's share of .the headlines, 

For example, the atmospheric 
tests of nuclear weapons by France 
and Red China renewed world-wide 
concern about radioactive fall-out. 
But this new concern has been 
considerably less than was felt in the 
past, because now we understand more 
about radiation. We know that man- 
kind has lived with radiation from 
things in nature ever since W3 first 
appeared on this earth. And we know 
that this natural background radia- 
tion is many times greater than the 
amount to which present fallout may 
expose us. Without implying thnt ra- 
dioactive fallout is not a hazard, wo 
can think of it as less harmful than 
the polluted air around the world's 
industrial cities. More than a thousand 
deaths resulting from smog were re- 
corded in 1909 In Glasgow, Scotland. 
In 1948, twenty people died from the 
contaminated air of Donora, Pa, In 
December 1952, four thousand deaths 
in London were attributed to smog- 
Fallout from nuclear explosions hns 
yet to compile such a record. 

Strangely enough, the chances nre 
pretty good that nuclear energy will 
help us reduce air pollution siibstan- 
tially within this century. For other 
reasons, primarily economic, this help 
already has begun in places such as 
Pittsburgh and Chicago where com- 
mercial nuclear power plants arc in 
operation. Such plants need no com- 
bustion air and omit no toxic gases. 
They do not contribute to air pollu- 
tion. With each substitution of a nu- 
clear plant for one that operates on 
fossil fuels, a reduction in air pollu- 
tion results. 

Because largo scale nuclear power 
production is beginning to offer a 
distinct economic advantage, it's prob- 
able that large areas of the United 
States one day soon will use elec- 
tricity generated by nuclear power 
plants. Some of the contamination of 
our air from coal and oil burning- gen- 
erator plants thus will be eliminated. 
This also would be ti-ue of nuclear 
power applications in manufacturing 
plants, " 

Air pollution also may be reduced 
even more in the future by the use 
of electric-drive automobiles. The bat- 
October 1966 



teries would be charged at service 
tations that pump volts instead of 
gallons. The tiger in the tank will be- 
come a sort of electric eel ! The pri- 
mary source of energy for these serv- 
ice stations again would be a nuclear 
power plant. It's conceivable that the 
same large nuclear power plants on 
our technological frontier will do more 
than light and heat our homes and 
service facilities, run our industry 
and power our automobiles. These 
same plants could also operate de- 
salting plants located near the oceans 
and help to supply us with fresh 
water. In fact plants of this kind are 
now under construction in California. 
Just imagine what a large supply of 
relatively inexpensive fresh water 
\vould mean to the Southeast and Far 
West. The Southwest has a special 
interest in this stretch of the nuclear 
frontier. 

This rich land of Amei-ica that we 
know today could not have been de- 
veloped if human muscle and animal 
strength had been our only sources 
of energy. The industrial revolution 
which made our good life possible de- 
pended primarily on. coal, gas and 
oil the fossil fuels. In the United 
States today we have six percent of 
the world's population, but we use 
about 35 percent of the world's energy 
output. Our reserves of fossil fuels 
are large. But we are forced to see 
that they are limited when we recog- 
nize that world energy demands in- 
crease annually at a rate of about 
three and one-half percent. We are 
expanding- our nuclear frontier simply 
because we must. 

There is another reason why we will 
be compelled to push forward into 
the nuclear future. Through our use 
of fossil fuels, we are adding some 
six billion tons of carbon dioxide to 
our atmosphere each year. Aside from 
being a health hazard, this pollution 
has given rise to the prediction that 
a climatic change could result within 
the next few decades, a warming up 
of the atmosphere that could melt tho 
polar ice sufficiently to flood our costal 
areas beneath a rising ocean. 

I've confined my remarks so far to 
out- nuclear potential in the areas of 
light and heat and mechanical power. 
And I've done no more than scratched 
the surface of possible applications. 
I haven't tried to cover everything 
because I don't want to keep you here 
all afternoon. I want to have time 
in my crystal-balling: to touch on some 



of the benefits to be found in other 
areas of nuclear technology. The first 
of these is related to our nuclear 
weapons effects research in the De- 
fense Atomic Support Agency. 

As you know, we conduct nuclear 
tests underground. This, of course, 
is part of our defense mission and one 
of the requirements of our Safeguards 
Program under the Limited Test Ban 
Treaty. In the future, however, under- 
ground nuclear explosions may be an 
aid in the mining industry or in cre- 
ating large underground reservoirs 
for gas, oil, or water. One project of 
particular interest to New Mexico 
is the "Gasbuggy" test proposed by 
the Atomic Energy Commission 
(AEC), the Bureau of Mines and the 
El Paso Natural Gas Company. The 
San Juan Basin, covering the north- 
west corner of this state and spilling 
over into Arizona and Colorado, has 
been recommended as the site of a 
nuclear fracturing experiment to in- 
crease production from a natural gas 
field. Fracturing refers to cracking 
the formation rock to induce greater 
production. If the process proves com- 
mercially feasible, it might be em- 
ployed to advantage in the other 
Rocky Mountain natural gas fields. 

A similar project to study the use 
of nuclear explosions to increase oil 
productivity from shale is under way. 

Nuclear explosives are expected to 
play an important part in the con- 
struction of a new Panama Canal. 
And they also may be used to cnrve 
out passes through our mountains for 
highways and railroads of the future. 
Needless to say, the ships that pass 
through the canal and the trains that 
use such mountain passes will operate 
on electricity produced by nuclear en- 
ergy. 

In addition to the things we'll be 
able to do with nuclear explosives, 
our technological frontier will pro- 
vide us with a variety of new and 
improved products made possible 
through radioisotopes and nuclear ra- 
diation, Many of them will be made 
of essentially new substances polymer- 
ized by radiation. Already new plas- 
tics and plastic-wood combinations are 
being made with equipment that uses 
the radioisotope to change the molecu- 
lar structure of materials. Similarly, 
isotopes are being used to preserve 
food for longer periods than refrig- 
eration allows. It's safe to predict 
that some of our food in the future 



will come from crops improved 
through treatment with radioisotopes. 
The Army, the AEG and the Bu- 
reau of Commercial Fisheries of tho 
Department of the Interior joined 
forces to build the Marine Products 
Development Irradiator at Glouces- 
ter, Mass., one of our major fishing 
ports. Pish, as you know, are among 
our most perishable foodstuffs. Ex- 
periments at the Gloucester facility 
have shown that preservation of this 
important protein source is lengthened 
considerably by irradiation. Since 
taste and nutritional value are not 
affected, this program shows promise 
for ultimate commercialization, 

In similar irradiation experiments 
with fruit, the shelf-life of bananas, 
for example, has been extended two 
weeks by treatment with radioso- 
topes. 

Radioisotopes have already gained a 
firm place in medicine. In the future, 
our hospitals will commonly use them 
for diagnosis and treatment of many 
illnesses. We have long: been accus- 
tomed to X-rays, a form of radiation 
used in medical diagnosis for years 
before we came up with our first 
atomic bomb. I doubt if anyone here 
today has not been subjected to dental 
or chest X-ray examinations. Radio- 
isotopes will be useful in examining 
body conditions that might be over- 
looked in X-rays. 

Isotopes are used extensively today 
in biological research, helping to i'e- 
veal new knowledge of the body and 
life processes. In some future in- 
stances, radiation or the laser beam 
will be used in place of conventional 
surgery, The laser beam is now being 
used in some eye operations. Radia- 
tion surely will be used to sterilize the 
instruments now used in surgical op- 
erations. 

Serious thought is already being 
given to the 'development of an arti- 
ficial heart powered by a radioisotope, 
Plutonium 238 the same isotope used 
as a compact source of electi'icity in 
some of our space experiments. The 
first space orbiting of such a nuclear 
battery took place on June 29, 1961, 
Now, more than five years later, it 
still is powering- equipment that sends 
signals back to earth. Based on this 
performance record, it's conceivable 
that not only a heart might be pow- 
ered in such a way but also that our 
astronauts might one day deliver such 
a power source to the moon, leaving 
it there to power radio transmission 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



29 



equipment for a year or more after 
the astronauts have returned to earth. 
The space uses of isotopes and nu- 
clear power are many. As Dr. Glenn 
Seaborg, Chairman of the AEG, 
observed, "The family of the future 
will watch live telecasts, direct to 
their homes, of events happening 
anywhere on the globe telecasts 
made possible by orbiting synchronous 
satellites powered by nuclear energy. 
And perhaps on one of these television 
programs they will follow a manned 
mission to a distant planet a trip 
made possible through the use of nu- 
clear rockets and auxiliary nuclear 
power." 

Perhaps it is this ability of nuclear 
energy to extend the human senses 
that is the most important part of the 
technological frontier. We now are 
ahle to see into ourselves and to ob- 
serve the microcosmic world inside 
matter. "We are able to photograph 
cosmic events that happened billions 
of light years ago. Our sense of hear- 
ing, too, has been enormously extended 
by technology, Our radar systems can 
scan the skies and the seas, permitting 
pilots to fly their planes through dark- 
ness and submarines to avoid under- 
water mountains. Giant ears now can 
pick up the sounds of distant worlds 
within the universe and listen for pat- 
terns which might indicate the exist- 
ence of intelligent life other than our 
own here on earth. We now can even 
hear the voices of fish in the deep 
water where light doesn't penetrate. 

With radar helping us to find our 
way beneath the oceans, we can use 
nuclear power to explore the depths 
and even to pump up the vast re- 
sources of the ocean floor for use by 
man. Isotope-powered beacons and 
buoys an'd navigational satellites will 
help us find our way on the ocean 
surface, It's not inconceivable that 
nuclear energy will make it possible 
for man to live beneath the seas if 
he so chooses. 

I mention this possibility of life 
underwater in thinking primarily of 
people who will work there mining and 
farming the ocean floor. But I men- 
tioned the population explosion earlier 
and I'm reminded that there are 
roughly three and one-half billion 
human beings in the world today. It's 
taken us a million years to reach that 
population figure. But with an increas- 
ing 1 birth rate and a declining rate of 
death, the world population in the 
next 80 to 40 years could be about 



six or seven billion. One day, elbow 
room on this earth will be at a 
premium. 

We will need more land on which 
to live and more land on which to raise 
food. We will have to increase the 
arable land of this world and make 
it more productive. We will be forced 
to build cities in regions where few 
people would care to live now on 
mountaintops and deserts and, per- 
haps, under the seas. Such cities 
might have to bo lighted, heated and 
air-conditioned almost continuously. 

At first glance, this would seem 
to be a situation to be "viewed with 
alarm." Modern technology, however, 
has given us the means to cope with 
the needs of the situation I described. 

A mountaintop where people live 
comfortably exists now in Wyoming 
where the Air Force uses a nuclear 
power plant to heat, light and oper- 
ate its Sundance radar site. A similar 
nuclear facility, operated by the Navy, 
makes it possible for men to live year 
round in the frigid temperatures of 
McMurdo Station, Antarctica. The 
Army operated its Camp Century on 
the Greenland icecap for several years 
With nuclear power. These military 
stations, established more or less on 
an experimental basis, have 'demon- 
strated that the fuel supply problems 
associated with human existence in 
hostile environments can be overcome 
with nuclear power. 

The nuclear fuel core for an Army 
power plant in Alaska normally is 
flown to its destination in a standard 
cargo plane. Weighing roughly 900 
pounds, it sustains operation of the 
plant, producing electricity and space 
heating, for more than a year. A die- 
sel oil plant of comparable size, oper- 
ating over the same length of time, 
would require a continuous fuel sup- 
ply, some 90,000 barrels of oil weigh- 
ing in excess of 26 million pounds and 
requiring 750 tank truckloads to get 
it to its destination. 

The nuclear frontier, like the fron- 
tiers that faced the American pio- 
neers, has its challenges, It also has 
its hazards. But beyond these, which 
after all give zest to the adventure, 
the frontier holds a technological 
promise that : surpasses anything in 
the history of mankind so far. 

The great westward migration of 
the 1800's also had its dangers. De- 
fenses were the bowie knife and the 
flintlock rifle, puny defenses compared 
to our modern nuclear deterrent. But 



the westward movement of the 1800's 
and our present-day venturing on tb?, 
technological frontier share a HE- 
mon characteristics, the curiosity &5 
a vigorous and valiant human bre&i 

Then there's the story of the ross 
who risked his life to climb a rugged 
mountain. When asked why he wanted 
to climb that mountain and risk h: 
life, the man replied, "Because it'i 
there." 

This probably is the most important 
reason why we will move on into the 
frontier of technology because its 
there. 



DOD Aims To Reduce 
Top Secret 
Inventories 

A proposed change calling for 
establishment of an annual Top 
inventory and the elimination by de- 
struction of Top Secret documents -will 
be incorporated into a forthcoming rt- 
vision of DOD Directive 62M.V'Saft- 
guarding Official Information in tie 
Interests of the Defense of the United 
States." 

The change will also include pro- 
visions for an annual review of Top 
Secret record documents to reduce ils 
inventory through downgrading, <!e- 
classification and transfer; and fiie 
clarification of document account- 
ability procedures. 



Control of SYNCOM 

Earth Satellite Goes to 

STRATCOM 

All ground-based link terminals in 
the SYNCOM satellite program hate 
been turned over to the Army's 
Strategic Communications Commar.i 
(STRATCOM) for operational > 
trol. 

The five-station network consists <J 
five transportable satellite commurj- 
cations terminals, around the worit 
The Navy operates two seaboard ter- 
minals. 

Until now, the Army's Satellite 
Communications Agency controlled fe 
SYNCOM ground environment, with 
personnel provided by STRATCOM. ; 

STRATCOM, headed by Major Gt> 
eral E, J. Meyer, manages th 
Army's global long-haul communica- 
tions and extends into more than SO 
countries, Its Pacific subcommand will 
coordinate all SYNCOM matters with 
the Defence Communications 



30 



October 



TABLE 1. NET VALUE OF MILITARY PROCUREMENT 

ACTIONS 8 

Fiscal Years 1965 and 1966 



(Amounts in Thousands) 



Fiscal Year 


Current Quarter 


State 


July 10G4 June 1865 


July 1 Sec- 


-Juno 1066 


April Juno 1065 


April Juno 1866 


Amount 


Percent 


Amount 


Percent 


Amount 


Percent 


Amount 


Percent 


TOTAL U. S. b 


$26,631,132 




$36,713,061 




$8,864,768 




$12,645,611 




NOT DISTRIBUTED 


















BY STATE D 


3,363,052 




3,999,768 




1,102,783 




1,327,918 




STATE TOTALS d 


23,268,080 


100.0% 


31,713,303 


100.0% 


7,761,985 


100.0% 


11,817,693 


100,0% 


Alabama 


165,176 


0.7 


281,549 


0.9 


46,431 


0.6 


96,187 


0.9 


Alaska 


74,175 


0.3 


71,666 


0.2 


19,205 


0.2 


22,370 


0.2 


Arizona 


176,857 


0.8 


248,228 


0.8 


69,952 


0.9 


75,611 


0.7 


Arkansas 


39,284 


0.2 


96,701 


0.3 


9,990 


0.1 


27,562 


0.2 


California 


6,153,639 


22.1 


6,813,078 


18.3 


1,660,286 


20.0 


1,843,560 


16.3 


Colorado 


249,151 


1.1 


255,893 


0.8 


65,717 


0.8 


98,742 


0.9 


Connecticut 


1,180,111 


5.1 


2,051,660 


6.5 


384,377 


5.0 


705,802 


6.2 


Delaware 


88,239 


0.2 


37,446 


0.1 


12,578 


0.2 


6,153 


0.1 


District of Columbia 


247,576 


1.0 


328,111 


1.0 


81,668 


1.1 


62,727 


0.6 


Florida 


633,332 


2.7 


766,956 


2.4 


103,363 


1.3 


163,688 


1.4 


Georgia 


662,417 


2.8 


799,362 


2.5 


169,718 


2.2 


400,478 


3.5 


Hawaii 


72,213 


0.3 


64,170 


0.2 


22,164 


0.3 


23,311 


0.2 


Idaho 


11,724 


0.1 


20,004 


* 


4,271 


0.1 


6,729 


0.1 


Illinois 


421,899 


1.8 


919,779 


2.9 


178,892 


2.3 


427,797 


3.8 


Indiana 


604,925 


2.6 


1,068,259 


3.4 


309,462 


4.0 


891,799 


3.5 


Iowa 


133,951 


0.6 


247,619 


0.8 


49,385 


0.6 


98,199 


0.9 


Kansas 


229,051 


1.0 


312,629 


1.0 


88,676 


0.4 


91,736 


0.8 


Kentucky 


42,749 


0.2 


70,057 


0.2 


11,600 


0.1 


23,726 


0.2 


Louisiana 


266,834 


1.1 


302,906 


1.0 


22,665 


0.3 


67,945 


0.5 


Maine 


68,771 


0.3 


61,340 


0.2 


8,030 


0.1 


24,520 


0.2 


Maryland 


584,333 


2.5 


842,627 


2.7 


211,462 


2.7 


283,354 


2.5 


Massachusetts 


1,178,729 


6.1 


1,335,952 


4.2 


397,383 


6.1 


464,335 


4,1 


Michigan 


532,897 


2.3 


918,426 


2.9 


196,153 


2.5 


396,362 


3.5 


Minnesota 


259,500 


1.1 


497,994 


1.6 


109,687 


1.4 


164,322 


1.5 


Mississippi 


152,188 


0.7 


162,305 


0.5 


66,618 


0,9 


76,699 


0.7 


Missouri 


1,060,781 


4.6 


1,112,666 


3.5 


680,264 


8.1 


419,092 


3.7 


Montana 


69,375 


0.3 


13,779 


* 


7,726 


0.1 


2,160 


* 


Nebraska 


42.708 


0.2 


80,478 


0.3 


9,856 


0.1 


36,288 


0.3 


Nevada 


19,142 


0.1 


82,028 


0.1 


5,792 


0.1 


4,602 


* 


New Hampshrie 


52,400 


0.2 


109,691 


0.8 


13,797 


0.2 


48,678 


0.4 


New Jersey 


820,309 


3.5 


1,090,122 


3.4 


266,778 


3.4 


403,390 


3.6 


New Mexico 


84,137 


0'.4 


86,280 


0.3 


30,565 


0.4 


26,104 


0.2 


New York 


2,229,478 


9.6 


2,819,163 


8.9 


1,002,666 


12,9 


1,110,498 


9.8 


North Carolina 


288,408 


1.2 


449,331 


1.4 


63,358 


0.8 


150,244 


1.3 


North Dakota 


48,997 


0.2 


88,113 


0.3 


10,160 


0.1 


19,396 


0.2 


Ohio 


863,113 


3.7 


1,688,965 


6.0 


840,285 


4.4 


679,630 


5.1 


Oklahoma 


119,803 


0.5 


158,492 


0.6 


20,083 


0.3 


86,248 


0.3 


Oregon 


39,624 


0.2 


89,983 


0.3 


14,631 


0.2 


29,200 


0.3 


Pennsylvania 
Rhode Island 
South Carolina 


988,811 
86,328 
81,680 


4,2 
0.4 
0.4 


1,666,087 
131,722 
176,424 


5.3 
0.4 
0.6 


326,476 
17,895 

17,272 


4.2 
0.2 
0.2 


749,988 
60,656 
70,616 


6.6 
0.6 
0.6 


South Dakota 


21,062 


0.1 


23-.816 


0.1 


8,696 


0.1 


4,662 


# 


Tennessee 


197,283 


0.8 


602,168 


1.6 


36,239 


0.5 


184,623 


1.6 


Texas 


1,446,769 


6.2 


2,291,454 


7.2 


316,624 


4.1 


771,032 


6.8 


Utah 


191,173 


0.8 


169,681 


0.6 


46,733 


0.6 


.40,096 


0.4 


Vermont 


32,202 


0.1 


81,066 


0.3 


14,056 


0.2 


39,568 


0.3 


Virginia 


469,097 


2.0 


425,487 


l.S 


172,434 


2.2 


170,298 


1.6 


Washington 


545,607 


2.3 


444,368 


1.4 


189,036 


1.8 


97,778 


0,0 


West Virginia 
Wisconsin 


90,812 
203,003 


0.4 
0.9 


149,300 
364,684 


0.6 

1.1 


62,996 
60,215 


0.8 
0.8 


61,628 
181,921 


0.5 
1.6 


Wyoming 


7,867 


* 


11,112 


* 


1,037 


* 


2,190 





For Footnotes, see page 86. 
* Less' than 0.05%. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



TABLE 2. NET VALUE OF MILITARY 

ACTIONS BY DEPARTMENT 

July 1965-June 1966 



(Amounts in Thousands) 



State 



Total 



Percent 



Percent 



Army 8 



Navy 



Air Force 



Defense 
Supply 
Agency 



TOTAL U. S. b 

NOT DISTRIBUTED 

BY STATE c 

STATE TOTALS d 



$35,713,061 



3,999,758 

31,713,303 100.0% 



Alabama 


281,649 


0.9 


Alaska 


71,666 


0.2 


Arizona 


248,228 


0.8 


Arkansas 


95,701 


0.3 


California 


5,813,078 


18.3 


Colorado 


255,893 


0.8 


Connecticut 


2,051,560 


6.5 


Delaware 


37,446 


0.1 


District of Columbia 


328,111 


1.0 


Florida 


766,955 


2.4 


Georgia 


799,362 


2.6 


Hawaii 


64,170 


0.2 


Idaho 


20,004 


* 


Illinois 


919,779 


2.9 


Indiana 


1,068,259 


3.4 


Iowa 


247,619 


0.8 


Kansas 


312,629 


1.0 


Kentucky 
Louisiana 


70,057 
302,906 


0.2 
1.0 


Maine 

Maryland 
Massachusetts 
Michigan 
Minnesota 
Mississippi 
Missouri 
Montana 


51,340 
842,527 
1,336,952 
918,426 
497,994 
162,306 
1,112,665 
18,779 


0.2 

2.7 
4.2 
2.9 
1.6 
0.5 

3.6 

* 


Nebraska 
Nevada 
New Hampshire 

New Jersey 


80,478 
32,028 
109,591 

1,090,122 


0.3 
0.1 
0.3 
3.4 


New Mexico 
New York 
North Carolina 
North Dakota 


86,230 
2,819,158 
449,331 
83,113 


0.3 
8.9 

1.4 
0.8 


Ohio 


1,688,966 


HO 


Oklahoma 
Oregon 
Pennsylvania 
Rhode Island 
South Carolina 
South Dakota 
Tennessee 


168,492 
89,983 

1,666,087 
131,722 
176,424 
28,815 
502,168 


U.V 

0.5 
0.3 
6.3 
0.4 
0.6 
0.1 
1.6 


Texas 


2,291,454 


7.2 


Utah 


169,681 


0.6 


Vermont 


81,066 


0.8 


Virginia 


425,487 


1 3 


Washington 


444,368 


l*U 

1.4 


West Virginia 
Wisconsin 
Wyoming 


149,800 
364,684 
11,112 


0.5 

1.1 

* 



For Footnotes, see page 86. 
* Less than 0.05%, 



32 



$10,324,723 



),710,832 $10,355,777 



$5,321,729 



962,943 


1,013,120 


1,166,161 


858,534 


9,361,780 


8,697,712 


9,190,616 


4,463,195 


99,331 


16,407 


63,093 


111,718 


18,450 


12,395 


34,249 


6,672 


71,020 


37,333 


132,454 


7,421 


31,321 


15,286 


6,541 


43,6B3 


943,965 


1,775,199 


2,494,860 


699,0134 


45,016 


17,482 


164,907 


28,489 


564,804 


1,056,102 


380,489 


50,165 


10,446 


6,653 


4,452 


16,094 


96,197 


166,104 


62,616 


4,194 


256,944 


116,969 


337,774 


56,268 


60,007 


30,609 


676,757 


131,989 


22,210 


24,162 


8,745 


9,053 


1,132 


111 


2,867 


15,894 


419,863 
640,995 


166,600 
108,221 


108,726 
209,166 


224,530 
109,877 


95,218 


65,296 


40,341 


46,764 


69,881 


10,698 


182,708 


49,342 


42,870 


3,351 


2,648 


21,688 


57,831 


74,791 


8,042 


162,242 


22,079 


6,574 


6,890 


16,797 


142,658 


475,230 


173,460 


61,279 


377,664 
637,194 


388,813 
60,811 


426,116 
183,809 


143,459 
86,612 


176,086 


125,263 


131,626 


6(3,019 


36,672 
233,386 


67,186 
690,268 


10,922 
145,382 


B7.D26 
43,629 


8,600 
86,860 


73 
1,623 


6,639 
18,111 


8,4*7 
23,884 


2,896 


1,787 


26,438 


907 


2,956 
360,965 
66,376 


70,088 
266,088 
2,924 


8,549 
251,319 
24,194 


27,909 
211,760 
2,730 


676,360 
188,313 
40,027 


1,168,751 
51,262 
199 


682,552 
22,163 
40,704 


841,509 
187,603 
2,183 


498,405 
23,024 


308,443 
6,175 


613,339 
81,344 


168,768 
47,949 


3,531 
633,750 
18,241 
16,928 

8n An 


34,146 
513,680 
45,718 
17,468 


12,833 
278,081 
2,284 
10,611 


89,433 
239,576 
65,478 
181,517 


,(47 

243,661 
845,697 


169 
44,047 
316,826 


17,729 
71,969 
769,710 


1,670 
142,591 

359,321 


39,301 


20,854 


85,878 


23,648 


72,831 


2,896 


3,786 


2,053 


118,627 


175,209 


66,621 


76,130 


85,331 


80,242 


258,825 


6&.970 


92,210 
174,339 


10,792 
62,374 


7,699 
48,987 


38,699 
89,034 


4,036 




14 

" " " >^ 


1,771 


5,291 



October 1966 



TABLE 3. NET VALUE OF MILITARY PROCUREMENT 
ACTIONS BY FISCAL YEAR 8 

Fiscal Years 1963, 1964 and 1965 



{Amounts in Thousands) 



State 


Fiscal 


Year 1903 


Fiscal o Year 


1864 


Fiscal Year 


i&es 


Amount 


Percent 


Amount 


Percent 


Amount 


Percent 


TOTAL, U. S. b 


$28,107,882 




$27,470,379 




$26,631,132 




NOT DISTRIBUTED 














BY STATE 


2,874,642 




3,053,272 




3,368,062 




STATE TOTALS d 


25,233,240 


100.0% 


24,417,107 


100.0% 


23,268,080 


100.0% 


Alabama 


194,990 


0.8 


190,681 


0.8 


166,176 


0.7 


Alaska 


103,476 


0.4 


101,646 


0,4 


74,176 


0.3 


Arizona 


285,761 


1.1 


173,826 


0.7 


176,857 


0.8 


Arkansas 


39,114 


0.2 


29,731 


0.1 


89,284 


0.2 


California 


5,836,670 


23.1 


6,100,650 


21.0 


5,153,639 


22.1 


Colorado 


444,196 


1.8 


889,611 


1.6 


249,161 


1.1 


Connecticut 


1,048,449 


4.2 


1,126,054 


4.6 


1,180,111 


6,1 


Delaware 


47,483 


0.2 


30,424 


0.1 


38,289 


0.2 


District of Columbia 


238,120 


0.9 


222,947 


0.9 


247,576 


1.0 


Florida 


683,237 


2.3 


782,691 


3.2 


633,332 


2.7 


Georgia 


423,290 


1.7 


620,169 


2.1 


662,417 


2.8 


Hawaii 


45,206 


0.2 


62,112 


0.2 


72,218 


0.3 


Idaho 


8,634 


W 


7,804 


# 


11,724 


0.1 


Illinois 


486,067 


1.9 


429,201 


1.8 


421,899 


1.8 


Indiana 


486,759 


1.9 


637,940 


2.2 


604,926 


2.6 


Iowa 


130,406 


0.5 


103,392 


0.4 


133,961 


0.6 


Kansas 


831,687 


1.8 


289,046 


1.2 


229,061 


1.0 


Kentucky 


55,725 


0.2 


40,476 


0.2 


42,749 


0.2 


Louisiana 


195,341 


0.8 


181,427 


0.7 


256,834 


1.1 


Maine 


58,409 


0.2 


31,531 


0.1 


68,771 


o.a 


Maryland 


606,365 


2.4 


647,936 


2.3 


684,333 


2.5 


Massachusetts 


1,060,166 


4.2 


1,032,062 


4.2 


1,178,729 


5.1 


Michigan 


633,047 


2.5 


691,290 


2.4 


682,897 


2.3 


Minnesota 


273,757 


1.1 


217,941 


0.9 


259,600 


1.1 


Mississippi 


186,089 


0.7 


165,911 


O.C 


152,188 


0.7 


Missouri 


686,111 


2.7 


1,349,071 


5.5 


1,060,781 


4.6 


Montana 


79,849 


0.3 


16,422 


0.1 


69,875 


0.3 


Nebraska 


33,659 


0.1 


33,921 


0.1 


42,708 


0.2 


Nevada 


13,143 


0.1 


0,361 


* 


19,142 


0.1 


New Hampshire 


51,174 


0.2 


64,857 


0.8 


52,400 


0.2 


New Jersey 


1,261,608 


6.0 


917,661 


3.8 


820,309 


3.6 


New Mexico 


61,642 


0.2 


71,486 


0.8 


84,187 


0.4 


Now York 


2,600,146 


9.9 


2,496,438 


10.2 


2,229,473 


9.6 


North Carolina 


268,987 


1.0 


278,516 


1.1 


288,408 


1.2 


North Dakota 


64,855 


0.8 


192,026 


0.8 


48,997 


0.2 


Ohio 


1,345,686 


6.3 


1,028,946 


4.2 


863,113 


8.7 


Oklahoma 


111,204 


0.5 


122,489 


0.6 


119,803 


0.6 


Oregon 


41,777 


0.2 


29,104 


0.1 


39,624 


0.2 


Pennsylvania 


887,462 


3.5 


888,065 


s.e 


988,811 


4.2 


Rhode Island 


46,970 


0.2 


88,173 


0.2 


86,823 


0.4 


South Carolina 


57,747 


0.2 


61,621 


0.2 


81,580 


0.4 


South Dakota 


80,630 


0.3 


28,308 


0.1 


21,062 


0.1 


Tennessee 


183,478 


0,7 


193,664 


0.8 


197,288 


0.8 


Texas 


1,203,123 


4.8 


1,294,431 


6.3 


1,446,769 


6.2 


Utah 


427,679 


1.7 


340,040 


1.4 


191,173 


0.8 


Vermont 


12,268 


0,1 


14,012 


0.1 


82,202 


0.1 


Virginia 


484,989 


1.9 


690,852 


2.8 


469,097 


2.0 


Washington 


1,041,681 


4.1 


1,085,696 


4.5 


545,607 


2.8 


West Virginia 


162,201 


0.7 


87,827 


0.4 


90,812 


0.4 


Wisconsin 


219,427 


0.9 


177,217 


0.7 


203,003 


0.9 


Wyoming 


125,081 


0,6 


49,408 


0.2 


7,867 


* 



For Footnotes, see page 85. 
* Less than 0.06%. 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



33 



4. NET VALUE OF CIVIL FUNCTIONS 
PROCUREMENT ACTIONS 1 



(Amounts in Thousands) 



Fiscal Years 1963, 1964, 1965 and 1966 



State 



Fiscal Year 

1963 
Jul G2 Jim 63 



Fiscal Yenr 

1064 
Jul 63 Jun 64 



Fiscal Year 

1065 
Jul 04 Jun 06 



Flue B] Ye 

1066 
Jul SB Jut 



TOTAL U. S. b 

NOT DISTRIBUTED 
BY STATE* 

STATE TOTALS" 

Alabama 

Alaska 

Arizona 

Arkansas 

California 

Colorado 

Connecticut 

Delaware 

District of Columbia 

Florida 

Georgia 

Hawaii 

Idaho 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

Maine 

Maryland 

Massachusetts 

Michigan 

Minnesota 

Mississippi 

Missouri 

Montana 

Nebraska 

Nevada 

New Hampshire 

New Jersey 

New Mexico 

New York 

North Carolina 

North Dakota 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

Oregon 

Pennsylvania 

Rhode Island 

South Carolina 

South Dakota 

Tennessee 

Texas 



$671,880 

40,634 
631,246 

5,764 

825 

S90 

43,542 

62,687 

486 

2,843 

6,101 

211 

21,043 

12,498 

466 

1,252 

17,654 

9,224 

8,294 

22,637 

89,835 

28,725 

841 

7,121 

10,904 

10,578 

8,444 

12,767 

18,141 

837 

6,388 

125 

662 

6,850 

3,983 

20,256 

2,907 

1,203 

16,226 

34,853 

31,173 

33,253 

3,545 

2,675 

18,791 

4,847 



$709,990 



$847,926 



$878,30. 



37,763 


41,020 


43,53: 


672,237 


806,906 


834,76! 


8,766 


11,968 


16,291 


10,699 


39,616 


16,801 


4,011 


4,301 


2,81) 


64,671 


76,816 


&9,42 f 


43,741 


59,289 


67,84'' 


135 


3,702 


921 


4,647 


5,476 


5,19-; 


9,081 


8,639 


8,97* 


2,083 


887 


8G( 


28,290 


27,659 


26.27J 


2,817 


6,862 


7.S4E 


1,916 


1,608 


1,48E 


1,500 


3,060 


6.82E 


16,188 


24,194 


22.19E 


14,970 


22,697 


26.08C 


16,166 


14,365 


12.16C 


21,304 


18,248 


12,884 


28,164 


19,303 


20,219 


38,279 


82,156 


54,921 


1,879 


2,238 


1.62E 


8,080 
12,390 


21,457 
11,998 


10,212 
6,065 


4,347 


12,035 


13,027 


2,532 


1,686 


4,128 


13,673 


12,018 




20,144 


22,766 


201709 


83 


1,100 


8,774 


4,558 


8,148 


8,613 








Q 


219 


2,431 


1,693 


5,784 


6,803 


3,803 


724 


1,117 


8,748 


12,866 


18,536 


12,400 


3,425 


3,797 


4,004 


503 


1,739 


8,811 


25,836 


17,939 


15,884 


24,699 


13,962 


31,614 


48,084 


74,243 


86,000 


86,678 


41,620 


37,776 


3,195 


4,951 


4,4&1 


2,761 


8,608 


2472- 


11,319 


10,915 


6,851 


8,946 


14,626 


18,773 


49,443 


89,420 


82,810 





41 


666 


64 


38 


68 


3,770 


9,864 


6,360 


36,419 


36,823 


B5.9B7 


25,578 


33,687 


23,182 


3,410 


3,426 


4,094 


632 


20 


290 



October I9< 



Footnotes 
DOD Prime Contract Awards 



Footnotes. 

* See, Notou on Coverage, below. 

b Include!! all conlraclH awarded for 
work performance In Ihe United 
States. The United Slates includes thn 
BO ntal.es, the Dinlriel of Columbia, 
U. H. powio.nnionH, the Canal /one, the, 
Commonwealth of Puerto liico, and 
other arenii nubjeel to the cmnplelo 
Hovereignty of Hie United Slalen, Iml 
doOH not Include occupied .lapaneiie 
islands aad tnint lerrilorlen. 

"Include!! contractn of lend limn 
$10,000, all ('on trad a awarded for 
work performance in the Common- 
wealth of Puerto Uico, U. S. pundit.- 
HioiiH, ami other iireim luib.jed to the 
complete Hovoreinnly of the United 
States, conlraclti which are In a elan- 
Hilled locationii, and any int rar,<>veni. 
menial contradii entered into overcejm, 

''Net value of coiilrad!i of $111,000 
or more for work in each ntate and tho 
District of Columbia. 

* Other Defense au'eneien, formerly 
Khown separately, lire included in the 
figures for the Army. 

'Civil function!! of the Army Cocpn 
of I'lnglm-ors for flood control and 
rlve.rn and barborn work. Civil func 
tions dala are nhown neparalely, and 
are not included in military fundionn 
tahulatloni!. 

' Kovliied. 

Notos on Covorcifjo 

It lit omphaid/.ed thai data on )irlme 
contract!! by ulate- dn not provide any 
direct Indication an lo I fie n title In 
which the actual production work iti 
done. l''ur the majority of eonlraetti 
with manufnrturei'n, (lie data ivllect 
tlio location of the ptanl wliere Ihe 
product will bo finally proceuned ami 
nfiKomblitd, If proceHnniK or aiMientlily 
IH to ho performed In more- than one 
plant of a prime contractor, lln loca- 
lion shown in Iho plant where the 
largest dollar amount of work will 
take place. Construction eiinlraeln are 
shown for the, ntate wliere I lie con- 
Htruction In to be performed. Kor pur- 
chane.n from wholesaler or olhw dlnlrl 
Imtlon Jh'inti, the location iu the 
of thn cnnli'iidor'ti place, of 
i. Kor ti(rvlcn I'iMitrartN, Ihe lo- 
cation In Keiumilly Uic plare. where 
tho Kovvkn IH performed, but for 
traiiFtiiortation and communieatlonii 
HorvkoH thn homo ofllce addn-fio in 
frequently uiied. 

Morn important is the fiutt that llm 
report roforH to jirimn contracfn only, 
nnd cannot in any way reflect llu- din* 
trlbutlon of tins very wilmluntial 
amount of material and component 
fabrication and other nubcontruitt 
work that may bn donn mitniiio tbn 
atato whore final nHBembly or diOlvury 
1 w takes plftco. 

Tho roport Includes dnAnlLlv< con* 
tracts, and funded portlonfl of bator 
contracts nnd h'ttorn of InUmt, job 
ordora, task ordorw, und purcbftn 
orders on. Industrial Annn, nnd 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



puvchaacs, 
made fi'oni or lln'ou^b othov Rovora- 
nienl.iil aivencieii, H uch a.s thosn mndi: 
throiitfn Urn Ciinoral SirvlcH Adaiin- 
mtralion, Tlie H tntfi data Inclndo up- 
ward nr downwnrd nivinioiiH aad ad- 
JiiMl.nii.ntH of $10,000 or mure, mu-h as 
cuncclliiUonii, prici! chaai;en supph;- 
nn|nlnl luvrciHiuintii, nmondmonts, etc. 
The ejitimalcii amounts of indiilinito 
delivery, opi>n-oiiil, or call typo con- 
tract.n fur petroleum are indude.d ia 
Ihn report, Kxcopt for putrolimm con- 
I radii, thn report doeti not include, in- 
dellnile dolivtiry, open-end, or call typo 
eonlnictii an siuch, hut; doen include 
npecillc purchaite or delivery ordera of 
!j! 1 0,000 or more which are placed 
Kainiil- theiie conlradH. MHO excluded 
from Ihe report are projoct ordern, 
i.e., production onleni \IW\\M\ to (lin- 
ornment'invaed-and-operalod fac.iliLieH 
iiucli a.'i Navy Hliipyardn. However, tho 
rejiorl include!! the rontrartH placed 
with iaduntry hy (ioverameat-opin-ated 
facilitieii to (Miaipli'Ui the production 



Logistic Bridge 



from /'//o 2) 

il.eind or If they ulip in prodncrtion. 
Uiflcn, Irtu'liH, riulion and iminuiaition 
are well Known munition!!, hut 1 mills, 
tenln and medical Mtipplien are altm 
vilnl. A year au'O, wit found timid hajfs 
MII critical Home were lieiiitf delivered 
liy air, I need not tell you of the im- 
porlaiu'o of food lo the IrnnpH. Thejie 
Iteinii munt (low from tho farms 
and factories over that military IOKIH- 
lie hridtfe throUKli ll> rapidly improv- 
ing hut ntill marginally iidoqiiuto won 
ports of Vietnam to the tvoopti ill Ilion 
Hoa, An Klic, Pleiku, or wherever tlmy 
may he. Twenly-flvit thoniiaud men of 
llii! I'irnL r.riKlftUi'H Command in Viet- 
nam aro Hie piirt rif tin- lonl.'iUe hriilfre 
Ihut dlnlrilmteH tho mipplioH to tho 
Army mid, in part, lo other Hervimi 
nt thai end. They ismi wivon million 
raUoiiH a mimth, niipport 17,000 vo- 
hirlen and IHHUO UH million ((nlloiiH of 
molor fiu'l. If lhi'o HKIU'CH w:em hard 
to K>'in*Pt >' (IU mM'l consldnr Unit tho 
tircyhound HUH (loot could expand 
altout threefold 'with this support. I 
know you bavu wad of tho ambush 
prabluinn that complicate tholr opora- 
tlomt on tbo road and rallroiulfl. Tho 
Hupply and' tranaportatlon troops in 
Vietnam ai-o well within range of 
enemy romhat weapons. 

In my prcnont capacity, I bavo a 
dlruct retiponslblllty for this logistic 
brldffo for tho Army nnd to some ex- 



tent for tho other Services. One part 
of the bridge is the Defense Supply 
Agency. It procures for the Army 
about 500,000 items from American 
producers and suppliers. All the cour- 
ii'KO. and skill of our troops will go 
for luuiffht if industry doesn't provide 
the things to flow over that logistic 
bridge, so the soldier can close with 
tho enemy with his health, his equip- 
ment and his confidence fully backed 
l>y tins might of our production and 
delivery capability. 

In closing, I should like to bring 
you a message from Lion tenant Gen- 
eral Knghsr, Deputy Commanding 
General, under General Westmore- 
land, of the U.S. Army, Vietnam. 
Some of you will remember General 
Kngler as former commander of tho 
Army's Supply and Maintenance, Com- 
mand. His message is as follows: 

"To date much linn been written 
and discussed pro and con con- 
cerning our progress here in Viet- 
nam nnd the unique aspects of 
tho fighting. I expect much more 
will be written or said before it 
is over. In reflection on the over- 
all situation, however, I see one 
facet which stands out above all 
others. Today, as in our previous 
conflicts, the American soldier, an 
well as the members of other free 
world countries who fight at MB 
side, is depending again on Amer- 
ican Industrial strength and 
American business know-bow to 
give him the host possible ail- 
vnnlage on the field of battle. 
From our viewpoint hero in Viet- 
nam, today's Industrial commu- 
nity, Just as its predecessors in 
World War I and II and in Korea 
did, in playing a key role in insur- 
ing that our soldiers have tbo 
best possible advantage. 

"Tho most heartening iiHpect of 
our task bore is the dedication of 
the American soldier to tbo Job 
which he must perform. Whether 
employing the now M-16 rifle, 
operating a bulldozer, unloading 
ships, or maintaining his equip- 
ment, his attitude ia sustained by 
the most tangible evidence of the 
U.S. national effort behind blm, 
the quality of tho tools and mate- 
rials provided to assist him in 
carrying out bis missions. Those 
tools and materials stem from the 
accomptiebmentB of tho men of 
American business and industry. 
"From Vietnam we send our 
thanks." 



35 



by 
Brig. Gen. A. T. Culbertson, USAF 



The Research and Technology Divi- 
sion of the Air Force Systems Com- 
mand (AFSC) is responsible for 
maintaining- the broad technological 
base of exploratory and advanced de- 
velopment programs to support the 
acquisition of new aerospace systems. 
Specifically, its eight laboratories are 
involved in avionics, flight dynamics, 
materials, rocket propulsion, weapons 
aero-propulsion, armament and elec- 
tromagnetics. One of these labora- 
tories, the Rome Air Development 
Center (RADC) at Griffiss APE, 
N.Y., is responsible for exploratory 
research and development in electro- 
magnetics. In addition to this R&D 
work, RADC is involved with apply- 
ing new electronic techniques to opera- 
tional problems through its support to 
the AFSC Electronic Systems Divi- 
sion, the Advanced Research Projects 
Agency, the U.S. Army and several 
other Government agencies. 

RADC has approximately 1,600 per- 
sonnel assigned, more than half of 
whom are scientists, engineers, or 
technicians. Its annual budget, which 
exceeds 100 million, is applied pri- 
marily to industrial concerns through 
more than 1,000 R&D contracts. Real 
estate holdings include 16 acres of 
floor space at Grifnss AFB and 14 
additional experimental sites within 
New York state. In terms of electro- 
magnetic research experience, RADC 
is a venerable organization. While it 
has just celebrated its Ifith birth- 
day as Rome Air Development Center, 
its World War II origin as Watson 
Laboratories near Red Bank, N.J. 
harks back more than 21 years. 

Essentially, the technological ex- 
tent of its efforts is divided into six 
major program areas: 

Information processing including 
advanced computer hardware and 



Reliability and compatibility 
the analysis of electronic equipment 
design factors necessary to predict 
operating systems effectiveness. 

Ground-based surveillance in- 
eluding general techniques applicable 
to the acquisition, tracking; and iden- 
tification of aerospace objects. (The 
primary surveillance emphasis at 
RADC is with techniques such as 
over-the-horizon detection, phased an- 
tenna arrays, base-line radar, navi- 
gation/guidance aids, and special 
ground detection equipments: site se- 
curity devices, nuclear detection and 
assessment.) 

Ground communication technical 
development including reliability, se- 
curity, media exploitation, signal 
processing and ground environments 
for aerospace relays. 

Intelligence research and develop- 
ment such as the extraction and 
processing of information from all 
types of reconnaissance and other 
collection media. 

The scope of this article precludes 
any detailed description of all of 
RADC's present projects or past ac- 




T. Culbertson, USAF, 
me Air Development 
.FB, N.Y. is a veteran 
30 years service. Ho 
f Parks Air College, 
[11., where he learned 
30 a graduate of the 



complishments. Many of the readers 
of the Defense Industry Bulletin are 
well aware of RADC's significant con- 
tributions to aerospace research. In- 
formation processing, one aspect of 
RADC's responsibility, which is ex- 
panding rapidly in scope and impor- 
tance, will be described more com- 
pletely. Electronic data processing 
(EDP) has become one of America's 
greatest industries, with the U.S. 
annual investment in EDP estimated 
at three billion dollars. The Defense 
Department, a pioneer user and de- 
veloper, employs about 85 percent 
of Government computers. Much of 
our present expertise in EDP can 
bo attributed to DOD-sponsored re- 
search programs. Certainly the pres- 
ent state of industrial technology 
could not have been achieved without 
the computer. I will resist any urge 
to predict far-ranging computer de- 
velopments and the concomitant 
effects on technology, for events hava 
an uncomfortable way of ovci'tnldiig 
the predictions of the most optimistic 
prognosticates. At the present stage 
of computer usage, it is evident that 
computers have not only been a bless- 
ing to man, but also that the impact 
and evolution of new computer tech- 
niques will have a profound influence 
on the traditional use of computers 
themselves. 

By the development of computer 
time-sharing techniques, the tradi- 
tional barriers that have separated 
the potential user with a problem 
from a timely answer to his question 
are being reduced. By utilising a 
computer as a 1 device to handle non- 
numerical data, we are just at the 
threshold of a new era in computer 
usage the manipulation of non- 
numerical data, i.e., information 
processing. New ways of applying the 
present computer art for information 
processing are being developed at a 
rapid rate. New hardware and the 
accompanying software program- 
ming, a little different from that of 
today, are being combined, to better 
handle non-numerical information 
data pertinent to future military in- 
telligence and command and control 



October 1966 



systems. In both of these areas, the 
Air Force relies on RADC for both 
development and application. 

Regardless of application the com- 
puter art benefits from continued 
R&D on such basic problems as faster, 
cheaper, more reliable components 
used in the logic and memory por- 
tions of the computer. While in- 
dustry is continuing general empha- 
sis, RADC is stressing high-risk, 
high-payoff developments such as 
cryogenics and optical components, as 
well as components and devices for 
computers required to operate in un- 
usual military environments tactical 
and space, for example. Increased em- 
phasis is being placed on program- 
ming, new computer organizations 
and hardware for information proc- 
essing. 

Today's major need is in the com- 
puter software the programming of 
the computer hardware to perform 
its various functions. Programming 
costs are too high. They can, and un- 
fortunately often do, run several 
times the cost of the hardware. The 
present high programming costs are 
compounded by the availability of 
many different types of computers, 
each requiring specialized programs. 



DOD uses computers manufactured by 
several different companies, with the 
resulting problem of language incom- 
patibility; programs at one installa- 
tion cannot be used at others if the 
computers are not identical. The re- 
placement of a computer at an in- 
stallation means that programs must 
be rewritten for the new computer. 
It is obvious that a need exists for 
machine-independent software pro- 
grams programs that are stand- 
ardized on a functional basis. 

Work is under way on the most 
efficient way to prepare the executive, 
or "boss," programs, which are usu- 
ally furnished by the computer manu- 
facturer and, in practice, "control" 
the computer. In June of this year, 
RADC installed the initial compo- 
nents of a GE 645 time-sharing com- 
puter. With this system RADC will 
exploit the increased capacity and 
flexibility of the simultaneous-mul- 
tiple-user "third generation" of com- 
puters. This concept is relatively 
new; many and varied users physi- 
cally separated from the computer 
can address It at the same instant. It 
is possible for 100 to 300 users, widely 
separated by geography, to utilize 
their own independent consoles to 




address the centralized computer. 
They should be able to use different 
programs (multi-programming) or 
bits and pieces of the same program 
(multi-processing) simultaneously. 

The RADC time-sharing computer 
in particular, the processor and 
the input-output controller will be 
modified to develop techniques for 
textual (non-numerical) information 
handling and new concepts of pro- 
gram swapping between computers. 
In the latter it will be possible for a 
computer program on one computer 
to communicate directly with a com- 
puter program on a computer re- 
motely located so as to sha're process- 
ing capability and common files of 
information. This extended third 
generation system of multiple-users 
and program swapping- will vastly 
improve computer utilization, systems 
management and command/control, 
while at the same time reducing the 
number of computers required to pro- 
vide a given level of service. 

Other RADG software efforts in- 
clude machine- independent program- 
ming 1 , wherein a user would not be 
restricted to a specific computer 
model but would be able to take his 
program to any computer. There is 
much work to be done in this area, 
which is presently limited by the lack 
of a comprehensive theory of informa u 
tion processing- and languages. Efforts 
are being renewed in computer 
standardization, with the Bureau of 
Standards doing an excellent job, 
and industry cooperating, Within the 
Air Force, the Electronic Systems 
Division of AFSC is charged with this 
responsibility, and RADC serves as 
its advisor. 

We are confident that our explora- 
tory computer efforts at RADC will 
lead to a reduction of programming 
costs and, all in all, make for more 
expeditious data handling which can 
only lead to more efficient manage- 
ment. We shall strive to maintain our 
stature as a leader in the field of com- 
puter technology. 



A typical large display console within the Rome Air Development Center's 
Computer Science Center. 



NOTICE 

Postal regulations require the use 
of Zip Codes in mailing the Defense 
Industry Bulletin to United States 
subscriber a. Please include your Zip 
Code when requesting subscription 
of the Bulletin, 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



37 



Educational Technology 

(Continued from Page Iff) 

"closed loop" which evaluates the 
man's suitability as a direct result of 
the training: input. 

In the instructional technology area, 
the Air Force has been recognized as 
a leader from the earliest days. Much 
of the total psychological research out- 
put has stemmed from Air Force 
efforts, along with experimental hard- 
ware that found its way into non- 
military education. Yet we believe that 
more can be accomplished by a joint 
effort by joining with the Office of 
Education and with academic and in- 
dustrial efforts. In this way we can 
share our knowledge and experience 
tackling the promising areas together. 

Tile Air Force can provide a signifi- 
cant "proving: ground" for research. 
Our organizational structure would 
appear to offer excellent opportunities 
to determine whether one approach or 
another is superior. Our testing feed- 
back can encompass not only the nor- 
mal "final examination" equivalent but 
also performance on the job. Here is 
where both curriculum and instruction 
have to meet the ultimate test, and 
this has to be done on a tight time 
span because of the limited period 
during which we can get useful out- 
put from the trained man. 

I have been disappointed at the 
lack in some circle a toward the 
policy enunciated by Secretary Mc- 
Namara for giving more of our cul- 
turally deprived youth an opportunity 
to benefit from military service. This 
policy emanates from the fact that 
our professional military men under- 
stand how to instill motivation and to 
teach military tasks to such men in a 
reasonable period of time. This policy 
will enable thousands of young men 
to know the satisfaction of serving 
their country and to be more produc- 
tive members of the labor force in 
their postnmilitary careers. 

I should hope that all segments of 
our society seeking to aid marginally 
educated youth would recognize our 
objectives; that they would wish to 
support our efforts to continue insur- 
ing a real gain for these individuals 
by curriculum design and evaluation, 
by instructional technique improve- 
ment, and by conveying to them a 
feeling that someone cared enough to 
take them in hand. 

Looking to the future, I feel con- 
fident that, in the period directly 



ahead, some significant progress will 
be made in education and training 
because of two major influences. 

First is the closer involvement of 
DOD and the Military Services in 
the improvement of educational tech- 
nology. This influence can be and must 
be utilized for the benefit of not just 
the Services alone, but for all educa- 
tion and training throughout the na- 
tion. Our military educational com- 
petence must be pooled with academic 
and industrial resources, providing an 
effective interchange and joint en- 
deavors where appropriate. 

The need for better educational 
process is so critical that we must not 
overlook any arrangement which will 
improve the national education and 
training effort. We in the Air Force 
believe that there is much to be gained 
by associating ourselves with compe- 
tent research and development every- 
where. 

The second influence is bhe deeper 
involvement of industry with the prob- 
lems of education and training and 
the use of industry resources in what 
has, heretofore, been considered an 
exclusively "public sector" task. In- 
dustry resources such as research and 
development, systems analysis, sys- 
tems engineering and management 
techniques have helped us to solve 
some tremendous problems in other 
areas. If industry can help us to 
hurl ourselves into vast space, might 
we not hope to have industry help 
us probe mental space and maximize 
our contributions in this area. 

This education and training is a 
large area to work in larger than 
the Air Force and Defense areas. 
There is much to be done great re- 
sources to be oriented to the tasks 
ahead. 

My purpose is to help build the 
overall joint structure wherein the 
Air Force will join with other 
branches of Government, such as the 
Office of Education and the Depart- 
ment of Labor; then, seek a continu- 
ing cooperative relationship with the 
professional educational community 
and with the enlarging industrial com- 
plex that is trying to identify its ap- 
propriate roles. 

We in the Air Force, in concert with 
the Defense Department, will continue 
to review our goals, structures and 
programs to insure ability to work 
together with other segments of our 
society to obtain the necessary results. 
We in the Air Force look to our new 



colleagues in education and industry 
to help us reshape these goals, if nec- 
essary; and to help us attain them 
in the most effective manner, not only 
in a military sense, but as part of the 
larger national education and train- 
ing effort. 



NOTICE 

On June 14-15, representatives of 
the Military Services briefed indus- 
try on military training and educa- 
tion programs and solicited indus- 
try know-how in suggesting future 
improvements in the application of 
advanced techniques. 

The National Security Industrial 
Association (NSIA) is planning a 
joint public service effort by indus- 
trialists and educators to contribute 
new ideas for improvement to the 
Military Departments. Dr. Eugene 
T. Ferraro, Deputy Under Secre- 
tary of the Air Force (Manpower), 
is representing the Defense De- 
partment in planning this project 
with NSIA. 



New Detection Device 

Aids in Search of 

Vietnam Junk Fleet 

The U. S. Navy has a new elec- 
tronic detecting device which it ia 
using in Vietnam to facilitate the 
search of fishing boats and other small 
craft for hidden enemy weapons, 

The cylindrical device, called an 
Ordnance Locator Mark 16, makes It 
possible to inspect a boat quickly 
without having to probe into boxes, 
baskets and other containers on board. 
The process is more efficient and 
limits to a minimum the inconvenience 
caused to innocent Vietnamese fisher- 
men. 

Now rapid probes with the Mark 
16 can detect rifles, automatic weap- 
ons, grenades and munitions in the 
varied cargoes quickly and is an in- 
tegral part of the massive stop-and- 
search operation being conducted by 
Navy, Coast Guard and Vietnamese 
patrol craft to halt the flow of arms 
to the Viet Cong by sea. 

The devise, developed by the Naval 
Ordnance Laboratory, White -Oak, 
Md., is about the size of a broomstick. 
It contains two magnetometer Tinits, 
an audio-readout circuit and batteries. 
The compact wand is waterproof, 
weighs about three and one-half 
pounds, and costs a fraction of pre- 
vious devices. 



38 



October 196* 




The following is a listing (revised as 
of Sept, IB, 1966) of the cases cur- 
rently under consideration by the 
Armed Services Procurement Regula- 
tion (ASPR) Committee. 

On items marked by asterisks, the 
text has been omitted to shorten the 
listing. The asterisks denote actions 
taken as shown below: 

*~~Case closed, no ASPR revisions 
resulting. 

** Case closed, approved for print- 
ing in a subsequent ASPR revision. 

***_ Case closed, approved for print- 
ing subject to further Government 
coordination. 

The listing includes subjects of in- 
terest to contractors but excludes 
cases of a minor or editorial nature, 
those considered sensitive, and those 
involving a deviation from the regula- 
tion which are processed by the ASPR 
Committee. 

DOD Ship Repair Contract Manual, 
To develop a single "ship repair con- 
tract manual" for use throughout 
DOD, replacing the various ship re- 1 
pair manuals now in use by the Mili- 
tary Departments. Sections 1 and 2 
of the proposed manual are currently 
in the process of coordination with 
the Services. 

**Cost Limitation Provisions. 

**Multi-Yenr Procurement Proce- 
dures. 

DOD Policy on Furnishing Compo- 
nents, Subsystems, etc., to Contrac- 
tors. To develop a DOD policy on the 
furnishing of components, subsystems, 
etc., to contractors m the procurement 
of weapon systems and other items 
of major equipment, as an initial step 
to the development of comprehensive 
ASPR coverage on the subject of ad- 
vance procurement planning. The com- 
ponent breakout portion of this prob- 
lem has been completed and issued in 
Revision No. 13 to the ASPR. The re- 
maining coverage has been considered 
by the ASPR Committee and is cur- 
rently being edited. 

Weighted Average Share in Back- 
log, This case is to reduce contract 
administration and Government con- 
trol of contractors who share overhead 
coats with the .Government by having 
predominantly competitive contracts, 
fixed price contracts, or incentive con- 
tracts, Government contract adminis- 
tration would then be able to concen- 
trate on those contractors with a low 



sharing of overhead expense with the 
Government. Industry comments on 
the contractor weighted average share 
(GWAS) coverage (text and cost 
principle applicability) have been re- 
ceived and evaluated. The revised cov- 
erage has been approved by the ASPR 
Committee for printing, subject to 
approval by higher authority. 

Industrial Equipment Modernization 
and Replacement Program. To con- 
sider developing a contractual require- 
ment for the determination of savings 
programs for inclusion in the ASPR. 
Proposed ASPR text and a contract 
clause for use in fixed price contracts 
to accomplish the foregoing have been 
developed and presented to the ASPR 
Committee for consideration, 

Derivation of Technical Data Prices. 
To develop appropriate coverage for 
inclusion in the ASPR or in the DOD 
Pricing Training Manual, or both, 
with respect to the determination and 
collection of cost information on engi- 
neering documentation and related 
technical data. 

Rental Charge for Use of Govern- 
ment Property. To consider whether 
the adoption of a policy of charging 
rent for use of Government property, 
across the board, would bo more prac- 
tical and less burdensome in assuring 
against competitive advantage and 
would result in a decline in the num- 
ber of requests for use of Government 
property generally. 

Value Engineering' Incorporation 
of Defense Procurement Circulars 
(DPC) No. II and No. 19 in the 
ASPR. To consider suggested clarifi- 
cations of the Value Engineering co-v- 
erage Issued in DPC's No, 11 and No. 
19 and to prepare appropriate ASPR 
language. Revised language was for- 
warded to industry for comment on 
July 29, 1966. 

Air Force Procurement Circular 
(AFPC) No. 6. To review the Correc- 
tion of deficiencies clause and the 
guaranty clause issued in AFPC 
No. 6, as modified by AFPC No. 25, to 
ascertain whether the clauses should, 
be included in the ASPR. A draft dif 
proposed ASPR coverage has, been 
considered and is currently in the 
process of being edited prior to being 
forwarded to industry for comment. 

Calculation of Under Payments and 
Liquidated Damages Under the Con- 
tract Work Hours Standards Act. To 



develop clarifying language concern- 
ing the calculation of underpayments 
and liquidated damages when an indi- 
vidual exceeds both an eight-hour day 
and a forty-hour week during the same 
payroll period in order to provide guid- 
ance on whether liquidated damages 
should be calculated on the basis of 
the number of hours worked in ex- 
cess of eight per day or the number of 
hours worked in excess of the forty- 
hour week. Proposed clarifying lan- 
guage in this area is being coor- 
dinated with the Department of 
Labor. 

Basic Ordering Agreements. To re- 
view the ASPR coverage on basic or- 
dering agreements (contained in 3~ 
410.2) to determine whether restric- 
tions should be included in the para- 
graph to provide that: 

Basic ordering agreements will 
not be used for the procurement of 
major systems, major modification, or 
major operation and maintenance 
(O&M) program items, provided this 
limitation, will not apply to unpriced 
"orders" for the repair of battle or 
crash-damaged aircraft. 

Contractors will submit cost pro- 
posals on unpriced orders within 30 
calendar days from date of receipt 
or prior to the expenditure of not 
more than 30 percent of the monetary 
limitations on the order, whichever 
is earlier. 

Basic ordering agreements will 
provide for distribution of definitized 
price exhibits within 120 days of the 
unpriced order to which it pertains. 

A proposed revised draft of ASPR 
coverage was considered on August 
24-26 and returned to the subcom- 
mittee for further redrafting. 

Industry Cost Sharing. To consider 
revising the ASPR policy contained 
in 4208 on industry cost sharing in 
connection with coat-reimbursement 
type contracts to provide additional 
policy guidance for use in situations 
when the potential commercial sales 
of the contractor appear to be very 
substantial and provisions for costs 
recovery by the Government of de- 
velopment expenses may he appro- 
priate. 

DOD Contract Clause Book. To con- 
sider adoption of a 1 contract clause 
book for DOD-wide use in light of the 
Navy's experience in the use of a con- 
tract clause book incorporated in con- 
tracts by reference since August 1, 
1964. Action on the clause book ap- 
proach haa been suspended pending 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



39 



the completion of a Service test winch 
started August 1, I960, of incorporat- 
ing clauses in contracts by direct 
reference to ASPR clause number, 
title and date. 

*Cost and Economic Information 
System (CEIS). 

Cost Principle Depreciation. To re- 
view the depreciation guidelines and 
rules issued by new Revenue Proce- 
dures C5-13, and to prepare appropri- 
ate changes to ASPR 16-205.9 which 
may be necessary as a result of 
Revenue Procedures 65-13 issued by 
the Internal Revenue Service, Indus- 
try comments have been received and 
are under consideration. 

Acquisition of Electronic Data 
Processing Equipment by Contrac- 
tors and Subcontractors. To consider 
proposed ASPR coverage in the sub- 
ject area presented by the DOD Steer- 
ing Group as a result of the Defense 
study giving consideration to the GAO 
views expressed in various reports to 
the Congress and pending legislation 
(Brooks Bill), as well as the recom- 
mendations received from industry on 
the Moot Report. Industry comments 
have been received and are under con- 
sideration. 

Proposed Addition to ASPR on 
Procurement of Privntely Developed 
Items. To consider a proposed addi- 
tion to the ASPR on the subject mat- 
ter to provide guidance and instruc- 
tions to contracting officers concerning 
the purchase of privately developed 
items. The recommendations presented 
for consideration, were developed by 
a Defense Industry Advisory Council 
(DIAG) working group which had 
been established to determine whether 
the DOD program to increase price 
competition has had a significant ad- 
verse impact on small and medium- 
size private risk innovators. On June 
29 DOD solicited the assistance of 
industry in identifying the problem, 
if any, to assist in the development 
of meaningful guidelines in this area. 

Revision of DD Form 250, To con- 
sider desirability of providing uniform 
instructions and guidance in the 
ASPR with respect to DD Form 250 
(Material Inspection and Receiving 
Report) to permit rescission of the 
existing and varied instructions of the 
Military Departments with respect to 
the processing of DD 260 forma. The 
proposed coverage, in addition, would 
standardize data, format and content 
of the DD 260 form for utilization as: 



An inspection document, 

An acceptance document. 

A shipping document. 

An advice of shipment. 

A receiving document. 

A contractor's invoice document. 

A contractor's internal use docu- 
ment. 

The f oiTns and instructions for use 
were modified to accommodate nu- 
merous comments presented by indus- 
try. As revised, the instructional 
material has been approved for pub- 
lication upon approval by the Bureau 
of the Budget (BOB) of the revised 
form. Final action on this case is de- 
pendent upon receipt of the BOB ap- 
proval. 

ASPR Section for Research and 
Development. To consider expanding 
the R&D coverage in Section IV, Part 
2, into a separate section giving con- 
sideration as to the scope of such cov- 
erage and how detailed the coverage 
should be, 

*Intra-Company Transfers of "Serv- 
ices". (Incorporated in Materials Cost, 
Intel-division Transfers). 

Review of Implementation of Public 
Law 87-653 Defective Cost or Pricing 
Data. To review the current ASPR 
implementation of Public Law 87-653 
on Cost or Pricing Data in light of the 
experience thus far obtained, to deter- 
mine whether any changes should be 
made in the ASPR coverage. Industry 
comments on the changes to the 
clauses have been received and are 
under consideration. 

Access to Records, Firm Fixed Price 
Contracts. To consider the recom- 
mendations of the GAO to the Secre- 
tary of Defense that the ASPR be 
revised to: 

Require contracting officers to 
evaluate the need for post-award 
audits where the. contract was 
awarded on the basis of certified cost 
or pricing data and there is reason to 
believe that such data may not be ac- 
curate, complete, or current, or have 
not been adequately verified; and in 
such instances specifically to request 
the Defense Contract Audit Agency 
to make a post-award audit. 

Provide a contract clause for all 
negotiated contracts which exceed 
$100,000 (except when the price ne- 
gotiated is based on adequate price 
competition, established catalog or 
market prices of commercial items 



sold in substantial quantities to the 
general public, or prices set by 
or regulations) to grant the contract- 
ing officer, or his authorized repre- 
sentatives, the contractual right to ex- 
amine all data, including books, rec- 
ords and documents generated during 
the contract period, considered neces- 
sary to verify that the data submitted 
and used in establishing the contract 
price were accurate, complete and cur- 
rent at the time of the contract negoti- 
ation and award. 

This GAO recommendation has been 
referred to the special subcommittee 
undertaking a review of the imple- 
mentation of Public Law 87-663. 

Contractor's Weighted Average 
Share in Cost Risk (CWAS) Anpli- 
cable to Section XV Cost Principles. 

To develop revisions to the contract 
cost principles contained in ASPR 
Section XV to reflect the application 
of the contractor's weighted average 
share in cost risk to the cost principle 
paragraphs and subparagraphs, In- 
dustry comments on the CWAS cov- 
erage (text and cost principle appli- 
cability) have been received and 
evaluated. The revised coverage has 
been approved by the ASPR Commit- 
tee for printing, subject to approval 
by higher authority. 

Environmental Pollution Control. To 

consider the development of con- 
tractual coverage to implement Execu- 
tive Order 11258 with respect to pre- 
vention, control and abatement of 
water pollution by Federal activities, 
and to assure that the standards 
established for direct Federal opera- 
tions are adhered to by contractors 
under programs financed by the Gov- 
ernment. 

*Revision to ASPR 3-808.2(b)(l). 

Patent Costs. To consider the rec- 
ommendations of a DIAC working 
group that ASPR 15-205.26 covering 
patent costs be clarified, in view of 
the varying interpretations of the 
present cost principle, 

Source Selection Procedures. To 
consider, the development of coverage 
for inclusion in the regulation wibli 
respect to the selection of sources, 
both in R&D contracts and in produc- 
tion contracts, which are not awarded 
on the basis of price competition, 

Equal Employment Opportunity 
Pre-Award Survey. To develop im- 
plementation of the Department of 
Labor directive of May 8, 1966, which 
requires a pre-award survey of the 



40 



October 1966 



prospective contractor's ability to 
comply with the equal employment op- 
portunity requirements, prior to the 
award of a formally advertised con- 
tract or any first tier subcontract in 
the amount of one million dollars or 
more. The Labor directive which be- 
comes effective for all Invitations For 
Bid for supplies issued after June 
1, 1966, necessitates the issuance of 
the initial Defense implementation in 
a Defense Procurement Circular in 
order to comply with the effective date 
of the directive. Permanent imple- 
mentation of the Labor Department 
directive will be issued at a subse- 
quent date in the form of revisions 
to the ASPR. 

""Contractor Team Arrangements. 

Package Procurement. To develop 
policy and contractual language cov- 
ering the application and use of total 
package procurement for inclusion in 
the ASPR giving recognition to the 
fact that the coverage of this new con- 
cept will not be all inclusive in its 
initial publication. 

Paperwork Burden on Defense Con- 
tractors. To undertake a review of 
the ASPR solely from the standpoint 
of paperwork requirements in an 
effort to identify areas where immedi- 
ate improvements can be made to re- 
duce such a burden on contractors. 

Review of the Implementation of 
Public Law 87-653. To undertake a 
review of the ASPR implementation 
of Public Law 87-663 in 'depth on the 
basis of the experience thus far ob- 
tained, to determine the need for 
further guidance or clarification of 
such coverage. This review has been 
divided into five broad areas as fol- 
lows: 

The submission of data. When is 
data submitted? Submission vs. dis- 
closure or availability. Identification 
of data. Contracting officer (and 
other) documentation. 

Definitions of "current" and "com- 
plete," Prom the standpoint of rea- 
sonableness and practicability. How 
should significance be considered? 

Examination of Records. Audit 
before negotiation. Audit after con- 
tract award. Audit of subcontractor 
data, 

Subcontract Problems. Subcon- 
tracts under firm fixed price primes. 
Second and third -tier subcontracts. 

Significance. From the standpoint 
of price negotiation vs. application of 
defective pricing clause. Price changes 



after price agreement but before con- 
tract award. 

Relocation Costs 15-205.25. To 
consider revising ASPR 15-206.25 
covering relocation costs to specifically 
set forth therein guidance to Govern- 
ment auditors and contracting officials 
in the treatment to be afforded the 
cost of maintaining unsold homes of 
contractors' employees who transfer to 
new locations to work under Govern- 
ment contracts. 

Cost Information Reports (CIR). To 

develop appropriate implementation 
of Cost Information Reports (CIR) 
covered in DOD Directive 7041.2 en- 
titled "Cost Information Reports" 
and the DOD Handbook entitled 
"Cost Information Reports (CIR) for 
Aircraft, Missiles and Space Systems" 
for inclusion in .the ASPR. 

Contract Modifications. To develop 
a new ASPR section consolidating 
service material dealing: with all 
types of contract modifications. Serv- 
ice comments on a draft of the pro- 
posed section are currently being 
evaluated. 

Handbook for Procurement Quality 
Assurance. To prepare an ASPR sup- 
plement which will provide stand- 
ardized procedures, where possible, 
for use of Government inspection and 
quality assurance personnel. A sub- 
committee report is currently being 
considered. 

Industrial Production Equipment 
Surveillance. To prepare procedures 
which will require an active Govern- 
ment program to assure that Govern- 
ment-furnished industrial production 
equipment in possession of contractors 
is being effectively utilized, A sub- 
committee, report is presently being 1 
considered. 

Production Surveillance and Report- 
ing. To prepare the initial parts of a 
new ASPR section dealing with the 
production function. This effort is con- 
fined to the activities of Government 
personnel in determining the status 
of progress on Government contracts 
and the reporting of the status, as re- 
quired. A subcommittee report is cur- 
rently under evaluation. 

Transportation. To develop a new 
ASPR Section XIX covering transpor- 
tation by expanding the existing Sec- 
tion I, Part 13, coverage to incorpo- 
rate therein existing service material 
and, thereby, provide comprehensive 
guidance, including jiecessary contract 
clauses and provisions. 



Bibliography 

(Continued from Page 14) 

par Inc., Falls Church, Va., for the 
Air Force, Sept. 1966, 212 pp. Order 
No. AD-G37 876. $6. 

Modules (Integrated Circuits) for 
Communications, Final Report. RCA 
for the Army, Aug. 1966, &0 pp. Order 
No, AD-636 441. $2. 

Investigations of Linear Beam and 
New Concepts of Microwave Power 
Generations, Vol. I. Cornell University 
for the Air Force, May 1966, 175 pp. 
Order No, AD-634 129. ?b*. 

An Improved Sonic Anemometer- 
Thermometer, Stanford Research In- 
stitute, Menlo Park, Calif., for the 
Army, Aug. 1965, 41 pp. Order No. 
AD-619 996. $2. 

Development of Controlled Impulse 
Techniqu e for In Situ Tea ting of 
Rock. Bureau of Mines, U.S. Depart- 
ment of the Interior, Denver, Colo,, 
for the Air Force, Feb. 1966, 98 pp. 
Order No. AD-628 860. $3. 

Establishment of a Long-Period 
Seismograph Network Utilizing Mag- 
netic Tape Recording. Columbia Uni- 
versity's Lament Geological Observa- 
tory, Palisades, N. Y., for the Air 
Force, June 1966, 44 pp. Order No. 
AD-622 794. $2. 

A Shipboard Cable-Hauling System 
for Large Electrical Cables. Woods 
Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods 
Hole, Mass., for the Navy, Feb. 1965. 
7 pp. Order No. AD-614 071. $1. 

Effect of Deep Ocean Environment 
on the Corrosion of Selected Alloys. 
Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory, 
Port Hueneme, Calif., Oct. 19G5, 18 
pp Order No. AD-626 586, $2. 

Study of Heat Transfer and Foul- 
ing of Heat Transfer Surfaces in the 
Deep Ocean. C. F. Barun & Co., Al- 
hambra, Calif., for the Navy, Nov. 
1965, 252 pp. Order No. AD-626 185. 
$7. 

The Low Twbulence Wind Tunnel. 
Navy's David Taylor Model Basin, 
Washington, D, C., Dec. 1966. 62 pp. 
Order No. AD-620 917. $3. 

Optical Vibration Spectra of Solids, 
IIT Research Institute, Chicago, 111., 
for Air Force Cambridge Research 
Laboratories, Aug. 1965. 232 pp. 
Order No, AD-626 B9B. $6. 



Government research and devel- 
opment reports are available to 
science and industry at price Indi- 
cated from ; 

Clearinghouse for Federal and 
Scientific Information 

Department of Commerce 
Springfield, Va. 22161 

Authorized DOD contractors and 
grantees may obtain these docu- 
ments without charge from : 

Defense Documentation Center 

Cameron Station 

Alexandria, Va, 22S14 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



41 




DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



Contracts of 1,000,000 and over 
awarded during the month of Septem- 
ber 1966: 

DEFENSE ATOMIC SUPPORT 
AGENCY 

28 General Dynamics, General Atomic Dlv., 
bnn Diego, Calif, 1.421,866. One-year ex- 
tension of work on DASA'a nuclear weap- 
on effects tent program. San Diego. DASA 
Hritra, Washington D.C. 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

1 ~t?i Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia, Pa. hns awarded the follow- 
ing contracts for wind -resistant cotton 
poplin cloth ! 

Burlington Industries, New York City, 
N. Y. 4,840,800. 0,000,000 yds. 
Dan River Mills. New York City, N. Y. 
52,787,760. 3,600,000 yda. 
J. P. Stevens & Co., Now York City, N.Y. 
?1,C30,476. 1,026.000 yds. 
PrcHtcx, Inc., New York City, N.Y. ?!,- 
368,520. 1,600,000 yds. 

The- Defense Fuel Sup])]y Center, Alex- 
nndrln, Vn., hna awarded the following 
contracts for fuel oil & gasoline: 
Metropolitan Petroleum Co., New York 
City, N.Y.. $1,663,800. 860,000 barrels of 
No. -G fuel oil. 

Gulf Oil Corp., Houston, Tex. 1,324,866. 
00,000 gallons of regular gasoline; 808,050 
barrels of heating oil and 88,700 barrels 
of No. 6 fuel oil. 

PntAgoii Oil Co., Long Island City, N.Y. 
$1,070,296. 473,000 barrela of No. 8 fuel 
ail. 

Stnndnrd Oil Co. of California, Sim Fran- 
clsco, Calif, 88,240,500. 1,770,000 barrels 
at No. fuel oil. 

Union Oil Co. of California, Loa Angeles, 
Cnllf. $1,014,100. 900,000 barrels of No. G 
fuel oil. 

2 Hercules, Inc.. Wilmington, Del. $2,023,- 
B30. 437,000 HH.UOTIS of herbicide. Wilming- 
ton. Defenao General Supply Center, Rich- 
mond, Vn, 

Slerrn Engineering Co.. Sierra Madre, 
Oallf. $1,220,703. 15.0GO combat vehicle 
helmets. Sierra Madre. Defense Personnel 
Support Center. Philadelphia, Pa. 

7 Putnam Mills, New York City, N.Y. Sl.- 

178,000. 3,800,000 equate yda of nylon 

parnchutc cloth. New York City. Defense 

1 Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 

Pet. 

8 Mobil Oil Corn,, New York Glty, NY 
$310,840, 275. 2113,900,000 gallons of grade 
JP-fi jet fuel. Defense Fuel Supply Center, 
Alexandria, Vn. 

Bloomsburff Mills, Now York City, N Y 
|1, 8-14,842. 1.5&1.200 yds of nylon duck 
cloth. Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

Union Oil Co. of Calif,, Loa Angeles 
On] If, $3,878,280. 88,304,000 gallons of 
ernde JP-6 jot fuel. Defense Fuel Supply 
Center, Alexandria, Vn. 

12 Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Mich. 82.- 
784,800. 370,000 Billions of herbicide. De- 
feme General Supply Center, Richmond, 
Va. 

Sfniitter Chemical Co., New York Oity 
N.Y. fIjMl.288. 910,252 enllona of tur- 
bine engine lubricating oil. Defense Fuel 
Supply Center, Alexandria, Vn. 

Itoynl Lubricants Co., Hanover. N.J. 31 - 
007,866. 810,252 gallons of turbine engine 
lubricating oil, Defense Fuel Supply Cen- 

. ter, Alexandria, Va, 

IS IT.S, Rubber Co., Providence, R.J, $2,240 - 
-OCG. 4,1500 fabric, drama (500-gallon cauac- 



CONTRACT LEGEND 
Contract Information is Hated in the fol- 
lowing flOfiuoncoi Date Company Value 
Material or work to be Performed 
Locution Work Performed Contracting 
Agency. 



ity) for liquid fuel, Defense General Supply 
Center, Richmond, Va. 

Semlnole Mfg. Co., Columbua, Misa. 51,- 
091,421. 384,000 pairs of men'a wool serge 
trousers. Defense Personnel Support Cen- 
ter, Philadelphia, Pa. 

14 J. P. Stevens & Co., New York City, N.Y. 
$3,7&0,000. 1,600,000 yda of polyeater fiber 
and wool tropical cloth. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 
Pacific Mills, Division of Burlington In- 
dustries, New York City, N.Y. 2,240,200. 
020,000 yda of polyester fiber and wool 
tropical cloth. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 

15 PIttston Cllnchfield Coal Sales Corp., New 
York City, N.Y. $3,036,000. 528,000 tona of 
bituminous coal. Defense Fuel Supply Cen- 
ter, Alexandria, Va. 

16 Gibraltar Fabrics. Brooklyn, N.Y. 1,181,- 
434. 6,000,GOO yds of nylon netting. De- 
fense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia, Pa. 

19 Aluminum Co. of America, Pittsburgh, Pa 
SM 19,602. 10,3GS,40 pounds of aluminum 
powder. Pittsburgh. Defense General Sup- 
ply Center, Richmond, Va. 
Vnlley Metallurgical Processing Co., Eaaex, 
Comi : $1,877,304. S6.1S7.400 pounds of 
aluminum powder. Essex. Defense General 
Supply Center, Richmond, Va. 

20 Bristol Mfe. Corp., Bristol, H.I. 81,630,102. 
420,330 pairs of men'a overahnea. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

Morris Bros., Inc., New York City, N.Y. 
$1,464,184, 2,076,000 cotton bath towels. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia, Pa. 

21 Prestex, Inc., New York City, N.Y. 83.- 
700306 5244,165 square yds. of cotton 
duck cloth. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 
Mount Vernon Mills, Baltimore, Md. SI.- 
22Mfl9. 2,000,000 square yda. of cotton 
duck cloth. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia. Pa. 

22 Consolibaff, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa. 2,086,- 
588. 6,001,000 burlap sandbags and 3,360,- 
000 pjmaburg sandbags. Defense General 
Supply Center, Richmond, Va. 
Crowley Industrial Bug Co., Crowley. La 
11,888,781. 7,000,000 osnaburg sandbags. 
Uefenee General Supply Center, Richmond, 
Vn. ' 

~~fil n n valler Baff Co " Lumberton, N.C. 1,120,- 
050. 26,000 burlap sandbags and 4,600,000 
oanaburg sandbags. Defense General Sup- 
ply Center, Richmond, Va. 
23 Rnytlieon Co., Microwave & Power Tube 
Dlv., Walthnm, Maes. 81,010,168. 18,036 
electron tubes of various types. Defense 
Electronics Supply Center, Dayton, Ohio. 
20 Society Brand Hat Co., St. Louis, Mo, 
$1,188,627. 088,980 hot weather field capa. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia, Pa. 

M&B Hcadwear, Richmond, Va. $1,125,000. 
1,000,000 hot weather field caps. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

Saddler Textiles, New York City, N.Y, SI,. 
097,009. 432,386 yda of wind, water and 
fire rosiatant cotton sateen cloth. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

27 DeRoasi & Sons, Vineland, N.J, 58,039,760. 
176,000 wool serge coats, Defense Person- 
nel Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa, 
28 J. H. Ruttor-Kex Mfg, Co., New Orleans, 
La. $1,048,632. 760,000 men'a polyester and 
cotton shirts. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia, Pn. 

C.F. & I. Steel Corp., Denver, Colo. $1,- 
660,774. 186,200 spools of barbed wire, 
Denver. Defense Construction Supply Cen- 
ter, Columbus, Ohio. 

U.S. Steel Corp., Cincinnati, Ohio. 81,- 
490,400. 144,000 Bpoola of .barbed wire. 
Cincinnati. Defense Construction Supply 
Center, Columbus, Ohio. 

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Akron, Ohio, 
$6,124,205. 722 Bets of runway membranes 
and 1,000 sets of taxi membranes. Akron, 
Defense Construction Supply Center, Oo- 
lumbua, Ohio, 



42 



30 Reaves Broa., Inc., New York City, NY 
$3,684,824. 467 seta of runway membranw 
nnd 300 sets of taxi way membranes. Now 
York City. Defenae Construction Suijnly 
Center, Columbua, Ohio. 

ARMY 

1 Cessna Aircraft Co., Wichita, Kan. $1.041,. 
467. Modernizing and modifying the 0-1A 
aircraft to the O-1G configuration. Wich- 
ita. Army Aviation Materiel Command, 
St. Louia, Mo. 

Bell Helicopter Co., Hurst, Tex. SH831 - 
868. UH-1D helicoptera, Hurst. Army Avi- 
ntion Materiel Command, St. Louis, Mo 

McDonnell Aircraft, St. Louia, Mo, J3,. 
000,000. Continued engineering do vl oil- 
men t for the medium nnti-tanli/a&BJiiiH 
weapon. St. Louis. Army Miaul! o Com- 
mand, Huntsville, Ala, 

Presto-lite Co., Toledo, Ohio. S1,Q20,<I3B, 
25 AMP generators for ',4, % and 2 ion 
trucks. Bay City, Mich. Army Tnnk Auto, 
motive Center, Warren, Mich. 

Mansfield Tire & Rubber Co., Mnnnfleld, 
Ohio. $1,484,102. 43,162 pncuirmUa tlrca, 
Mansfield. Army Tank Auto-motive Coaler, 
Warren, Mich. 

2 Chrysler Corp., Detroit, Mich. $44,000,000. 
M001E3 tanks, M72S combat cnsinocr ve- 
hicles and (armored vehicle launcher 
bridge) AVLB chassis. $3,600,000, XM3I 
turret trainers. Warren, Midi. Army 
Weapons Command, Rock Island, 111. 
6 Gary Excavating, Inc., Branford, Cnnn. 
$1,343,745. Work on the Sucker Brook l)nm 
and Reservoir Project. Wlnstofl, Unnn, 
Engineer Div., New England, Wnltlinni, 
Mass. 

7 Epsco, Inc., Weatwood, Mass. $1,032,000. 
Mobile tracking systems, eroumt Blnllan,! 
and airborne transmit ter /telemetry lifts, 
Weatwood. Army Miaailo Command, lliintt- 
ville, Ala. 

Bauer Dredging Co., Port Lnvacn, Tex, 
1,038,186. Work on the Mississippi Hivcr- 
Gulf Outlet Project. St. Hernnnl nnil 
Plaquemine parishes in Lowlaiana. En- 
gineer Dist., New Orleans, La. 

Gardner Construction Co., Onk 1'nrk, lit. 
$1,281,561. Construction of nil aulnnicllc 
data processing building, with utlUtlca, nt 
the Army Ammunition Plant, Jollcl, 111. 
Engineer Diat., Chicago, 111. 
8 Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navlffi- 
tlon Co. and Union Pacific flnllronr] Co.. 
Portland, Ore. $2,700,000. Work on ihd 
Little Gooae Lock and Dam nnd Ilia flrniv 
ite Lack and Dam on the Snake Itlvcr. 
Between Rtparla, Wash, nnd Lcwlalon, 
Idaho. Engineer Dist., Walla Wnlla, Wiwh. 

Eltra Corp., Presto-lite Co. division, To- 
ledo, Ohio. $1,829,284. 36-AMP ftoucrnton 
for cargo trucks. Bay Oity Mick, Army 
Tank Automotive Center, Wavron, Mtoli, 

Standard Products Co., Cleveland, Ohio. 
$2,061,101. Track shoes for tlio M1H .arm* 
ored reconnaissance vehicle. Port Ollntnn, 
Ohio. Army Tank Automotive Conler, 
Warren, Mich. 

Texas Instruments, Inc., Dnllnn, Tan. 
$1,000,000. Classified electronics equSnnu-nl. 
Dallas, Army Electronics Command, Foci 
Meadc, Md. 

BAVCO Corp., Richmond, Ind, $2,340,110. 
Bomb components. Richmond, AmiminEtSon 
Procurement & Supply Agencj 1 , Jollot, 111 
12 Western Electric, New York Oily. N.V. 
(1) $266,581,512. Continued Nlha X re- 
search development and testing. DurUrujton 
and Greensboro, N.O. (2) $8,086,08(1. Nih 
X research and development fad] ill en, 
Whippany, N.J. (8) $12,S84,29fl. Contin- 
ued Nike production planning nnd produc- 
tion engineering. Greensboro and Burling. 
ton, N.O, Nike X Project Office, Itedaton* 
Arsenal, Ala. 

L.T.V. Electro Systems, Greenville, fl.O. 
$2,070,000, Services and mntcrlnl for Iho 
development of engineering change pro- 
posals and modification work orden Ca 
the manufacture of kits for U-l, IT-d ind 
U-8 aircraft. Greenville. Army AvI&ISon 
Command, St. Louli, Mo. 

October 1964 



H - 



Iti 



2{l-- 



?.l- 



Gonernl Mntom, Dull-oil, Midi. $l,42fi,OH((, 
Service)) for rwiiUlvrilinn, rolut 1)11 lint ion 
nnd iirociii'wiiciil of iirodiiciinii innihuin'iit 
for tlio Ht. I'Diilii, Mo,, Army Ammunition 
PInnt for tin; production of lOfimm nlidln. 
Anmnilion Piwm-umi'Ml tt .Supply A|ti'in-y, 
Jollol, HI. 

Koppcrfl (Jo., Now York (Illy, N.Y, $1, 500,- 
Bfl7. Work on a flnoil iiroU-iillori projivt 
mint 1 Hcranton, I'u, Kinrlnt;or Dint., Unlll- 
inoi-fl, Mil. 

Adanllc (Jiilf A Pnrlflr mill ('nnntriirlloii 
AjiKri'BntCd ("or p., Nuw Ynrk I Illy. N.Y. 
$2,008,70!!, Work on Ilici Inlnttd Wiiti'i-- 
wnyii, Oeliiwni-o Itlvt'i 1 ninl (lln'iiapcaki- liny 
1'rojoi't. Hi. (iconri', Del. Kiitriiii'i-r Dlui., 
I'liilailt'lphln, Pa. 

-fHowart-Wnrnor Our p., Iiiilliiiinpi)llii, hid. 
$1,211,07(1. Mtiliil pin-In for oi-iltiam-o Ili'inn, 
Inilirinitpollit. Ammiinlllon t'riiriu'i<m<'iil Ki 
Supply Aitom-y, Jolli't, 111. 

Mi Sl.tt7fl,!)K7. llornli i'mnptimnild, (Vi- 

copmi l-'atl'i. Ammunition I'roiinri'mt'iil ft 
Supply Aitt'iniy. .lolinl, 111. 

-AV(M! 1'iirp., HlriillWd, (!onn, (1!, IN I II, II 111!. 
T fifi !. 7 imitlm-ri for mi|>pi>rl of I'll -17 
nin'nifl proirriun. tl4.WVH.IXW. T nil 1, 
1I/1JI lurlihic iilri'riifl cimliin, fur Mm |-'Y 
07 IIII ID ami AH Hi iiln-rufl prounim. 
Hlrntfonl. Army AvInHun Mnii-rlul dun. 
mnml, Ml. Loiiln, Mo, 

(Joimrnl Mutorn, YpiillnnM. Midi. J1!,1WI|.. 
000. l-'ni;IIIUni fur llm iniiniifiu'liir.' uf 
!!0mm iiiilomnlli' itumi, Yimlliinll. Army 
Woajmim ('imimiind, Hock Inland, 11). 
Kunllli Itndln Curii,, Illili-n^n. 111. si,;inv . 
I10H, Itiirkcl. /IIR.VI (M-UWt. nillra,ro. Am- 
munition 1'nn-nrcimml & Huunly Atfi<iii-i' 
Jollut, III. 

-.Hell Aorimmu-o Corp., I'orl. Wnrlti, Tex, 
tI,K72,l)0, III! IK li.-Hni|il<Tii. l',>ri Wnrlli. 
Army A v hit inn Mnti-rli'l Cnmnmuil, HI. 
Loulii, Mn. 

Itnyllioon Co., Niu'wnml, Mam,, Jtl.OHV.nnfi. 
(lommunli-allon nviilnin ['i>riiiiiin.'nln, Norlli 
I)l,(l,(on, Miihu, Armv Mli'i'lroiilcu ('mii- 
mniid, 1'lillaili'liihln, I'u. 

Chrln UPTKN. Inc., Himlllr. Wnnli, !H,:)il!1 
OHO. Di'innlltlfin nml I'liiiiilrui'tlun w.ivli al 

ICoiHnk, Alanhii. Kuicl r llhit,. An.-liiir. 

HKii, Alanku, 

I'Jlcrlrlc, lli'hi'in-i'iadv, N.Y. 81,- 



Abor- 



.. , , ii>ry 

IiiNlnlltillon, mill ti'iil of lluv.* KVA iti-n- 
i-nilorri niul ni'l'in IIMHUII-.-I. n.'li.'m'i'linlv, 
N.Y, ninl Wnil I'oliil, (In, MimliifKr Mini . 
Hiiviiiniiili, (In, 

J'nitP ('oinmiiiih'nilotm nindm-tira. tnr,, 
WiinhliiKtiiii, n.O. SI.l!N(l,mm. Wm-h <m it 
nuiniiiitilriKlotin nyntitin In tl>nitlii>in<l Anln, 
Army hlci-lrimlnt I'.nmiiiiml. Furl Mini- 
niniilti, N..I, 

Nortliftiinl ('(iiintrinlliiti Co. f \v r ,t Vlr- 
Rliiln, Allniininrtiiin, N,M. JH.llllll.ur.d K*. 
liruiiiloi, of Inihiiim fncllltlfii nt l',,rl (ior.. 
dim, l. (i. Hindi,,.,,,- IMni.. tlnvniiMiih, lj,i. 
Hiiorry Itnml C,ir|i.. N.tw Void <!liy NY 
*IU01!,OIH, MIX mllifx, Illninn, iiirlol i.i.H'i 
ninl ninln(i>nnnco m-i Ml !.<-,, l,n|n|,,,, n 
Army Aimniiiiltli.il I'li.nt. tllmivniKirl. |, ( , 
/>"' ...... '"I"" I'Mifliirhmi.iii & Min.i.ly 

Aiti'lii'y, Jnlliil, 111, ' r 

Nnttoiiftl (lypHinn, Il,,tr,,| ( ,. N .Y. ?l,l)li!I.Hifi 
MiUiili>iiiii,v,inndnii|,]M.mit-t'vli'.-.i m Kiutunn 
Army Ammiiiilil,,,, |.|i,i, i' nn(11 ,, ( ,, K.M.. 



* HHKPr, HIUN Mni.ni> Co., !.,.. 
im, Ky. )li,rilH).!|u;i. vflll.lh, ] ..... , nil( | 
iiiiiliiUiiiiiiifi) ittiil Hiii<|>orl ncllvlllrn nt Cunt 

lHt n mi r M r !" y A Al '""!>lt' I'Uitl, <!rnd 
IB n . 1 1,. Nwli. Amiimnlllr.ii inwiirpmni A 
H'limly Ai>nny. Joll^l. 111. 
avomm ArHaiml, hir., IHvl.lmt of Hie 

' 



. " 

ll " ( :""' 1 "nd r 

. 1 Arm * r A"iMmii 
, ili,. AintiniitU on I 
A ili|,i,|y AilMiry. .lidlH, 111. 



. Ml.,.,, 

" ""' 

Tw i "''I'l'"' wrvfM M Urn 

Mh ,.; . A , riliy Amrniinlilnii l-Urn. 
'""' MIn - Ammnnlilnii Vr t ,tr. 



" !l '"i "> 
r AlrrrRfl 



Ice inli 



nillt 



uf 



hm - 

117 -Konl MDlora. IHjjIiliini! Pnrk. Mich. $0,878,- 

.lol^V 1 '^ Utlllly lni h - "lKlilon.1 Park. 
1 i. Jmt Mniinwr. funeral Purimso Ve- 
' - 



. 

H, Wrin-on, Mich. 



, ,., 

BIIIIH. 



- '- 

nmclilno 

ro , m , 



(lmlninirlt.m ImlldiiiK nn'd five 

Dafen Industry Bulletin 



Arnwi , l - iirnBoii. 

A h j n l i"", 1 '" 1 '," !o " 1 ' 11 ' 11 " 1 . <* Ilniul, 111. 
? 74 n K , ( '" lnllll!r ' 1 '. MonlclnlP. N.J. 

v II < ' ,. A "! imi " 1i( , m llox - Hmcr- 
vill.t, (.I,. Inmkfnn] Ai-Hnnnl. Pn. 
I,om-rnl M 1( i (lrH l!| l!V1! |nd, Ohio. Ji.ofia,- 
Mil." 1 ",'"' tl(llml "K niioinMIi for tho 
A," , v T" i W A l '. (mimn ,'l l'"l. GlfvolAnd. 
Ml.'",! Autnmotlv,, Contor, Wnrron, 



iM,, un . 

i,, ; "I' 1 "', F"!" 1 . ! ln' Iwlt link,, 
Itiii'kfo'd. I'ninhfiinl Ann-mil, P ft 

K;:" iz!r5;i;,y!;E 

KSnTH,.*,^ sr 1 " E """ ; ...... " 

Vrtro, Inc., (iiirlnml, 'IVx, $H,it7(l,tiZO. Perl- 

!'1'?''T ,'""' "''"'r 1 """IMiiionln for (tin 
iimniTi n.<!, mim |M t) nnfi(. nnfiiuill vtihl^lc 
l.nrlHml. l-'mnltforil Ariumi,], 1',,. 
ti in n i. Kr "M" rrl1 ( ' orl '- Aloxnuilriii, Vn. 
Ar'mJ 'VI , (:<l , m|ll i '"' .I'^Kfiini fi- Hi" 
fl, IK. '"," 1 ';" !' r " vl ! 1|r (; '-'"""l "MlHiorl 
1 1 nil ly ( l.ort Ilim.'lmn,, Arls. Army 
.Irrlnml,. l'n, v |,, H (irmmd. 
i!U lliirvoy Aliimlnitni, Inr., 'IVirrninsit, Cnllf. 
* I .SIVn.fiSlH. llllitun Im-i'iidlnry iirojwtllcii. 
liii'i'imfi', ('i-nnkfnrd Arituntil, 1'n 
AVi-Hlcrn Klcrtrlr, Nitw York Olty, N.Y. 
Sl,j!0;t,!l1l, [ l. Oi>iTiillon iunl mnlntoimnno f 
rn.iiri, nl Hi.. Wlill.t Huinln MliwIUi Iln Kn . 
N,M. Army Mlmillo Coinnninil, Hiinliivlllo, 
Alii. 

AVrnlprii ICIirlrlr, Nnw York (lily. N Y 
S!i,tmr.,oi)l), Nike ll.'rnilm niodlllonllon ttlttt. 
Ititrllinrl.in. N.ll. Army Minolta (!ommnml, 
Uiintiivlllo, Alii. 

MAn" 1 ,,? 1 "," 011 ' '! 1C " Ht ' rl "l". Wnflh, 8l,aiB.- 
.HH), Wnrk on HID Wnlln Wnlln Itlvt-r I'ro- 

fe''i'i f' 1 ".' Um ^"Klni'i'r Dint., Wllu 
Wnlln, Wmdi. 

-'S.rHfr Corp., l>i.||iir,^-, ()|,| n , $072,0(12. 

..mm, Inmiillnry i.n.Jccllli'ii. I)c||[iuco. 
rrnnhfiird An ..... |, i', 
'riuHiiiiH Cnnnlnirlloi, (;., HI. Jnnutili, Mn. 
IL/HLBIKI. KrtTtlun of lid nrprnUrlimtrd 
Imll.lliiHi, ill. Fori. t.coiinnl, Wood, Mi,. 
iMiifliii'i-r Dlnl,, Knmiiu, Olty. Mo. 
;m It nn I nut on ArntN On.. IlrldKimorl, (Idiin. 
8:il,!IH'.!,nrill. HDiiMii 1'nrlrldifi'n mill for ii]i- 
I'rtilloii i, ml niiilnli'i, imco nollvllli'ii nt Lnliii 
I'lly Atniy Aimminllloti Pliinl, Iiidciioml- 
ITH-I-. Mo. Amimmllloii rNiPnromniil A 
lm|i|dy Aitt'm'y, JoliM, 111. 
I'.H. Ktililicr ('.. New York CHly, N.Y. 
*',!!!,)Ull,7nn. Mxnlunlvr.'i nml for mnlntn- 
iiiim'ii itiul i,ii|iimrl iiiii-vli'i'j, nl Um Army 
AiiiiuiniUl.iii I'liuit. .Tollt't, III. Ammiuillldii 
I'n.ciirrmriil A Huinily AKem:y, Jollni, III. 
Dny A Xlnimrrmnii, Inc., Phllmlrliililn, 1'n, 
(WUfllMH.'l, Ammiiiililim cnmiiimoiitti unit 
fr njn-riiUnn nml Tiiiilntt'iiiini'ii nollvlltcn 
nt llii> ],<im> Htiir Army Amtminltlon I'tiuil, 
'rcinrknnii, 'IVx. Ammiiultli)]) Pnicuri!- 
iiirnl & Hui'l'ly Aiii'iiry, Jollul, 111, 
Ullli MnllilpHnn Cliemlrnl Corn., Now 
York Oily, N.Y. 11,007.8117. Mnlntcimnco 
nnd mi|i|inrt Ni-rvlri'ii ill llui Alitbiumt Army 
Amimmllliin I'lnnl, Clillilonilmm. Alii. Am- 
iimnlllon l'ro^iir<>im<iit ft Huiiii y Aitonoy, 
Ji.Hi.1, HI. 

llnrvey Alitmliuim Hnleii (!o,, Inr., Tor- 
rmifti. (^nllf. Ba.fiOH.BOl). Olnm.lHod nm- 
mi, nil Inn lt<<mn nml fur <>|i<<riu1rm uml 
im)hiii>nniiri< nrtlvlllcn nl tho Army Am- 
munition I'lnnt, Mlliui. Tonn, Ammnnl- 
llnn I'rihCHnimiiril A Huiiiily Auunoy, 
JolM. 111. 

I'.H. Tlmp Corimrfltlon, Wiitorhury, (lonn. 
JH.dDH.Odll, Arlllh-ry nhcll tinea. Wilier- 
t<iwn. Ainmiinltlon Fnnuironiorit ft Supply 
Awm')'. Jotlet, III. 

Itiiylliton Co.. Ilrhtol, Tcnn. jn^H^SflO. 
7 fill Oli iHimli nimtmiicntM. Ht-litlol, Ammunl- 
(Inn r'r.ieurc-mciil & Hupply AKDiicy, 
Ji'lfot, III, 

-Wrljtlil Climlc*1 Corn,, Acme, N.O. (I,- 
(10D,m)0, I'rtHluttlim (if oxploHlvcH. Ac my, 
Ainiiuinlllim Pruciiri'iticiiL A HujMily 
'Aucupy, Jdlliit, HI. 

Union (;rhh!e Corii,, Now York City, N,Y, 
S1,~1!1,(1SK, Dry ImlturlcH for Itio AN/ 
I'ltl! H, nml 10 itortnMo radio Hotfl. 
Olianiway, N.(J. Army Klo-lronlcs Corn- 
run ltd, Pit Muriel |ih In. Pn, 

Tool Co., Culvor Olty, Calif, !, 



73D.R88. Liffht obtiervation helicopters, re- 
lated inibncftllons and epeclnl tools. 30,- 
310,747. OH.fi A lieHcoptei-8. Culver City. 
Army Aviation Materiel Command. St. 
Jjoiils, Mo. 

Bell Aerospace Corp., Fort Worth, Tex. 
$l,23S,fiOO. An nrmamQiit ays tern and for 
tralniiiK devlccw for the AH-1G licltcrtjrter. 
I'ort Worth. Army Aviation Matcrlol Com- 
mand, St. Lcinls. 

Hnrwcll-Kllnoro Corp., Toonc, Tnnn. $1,. 
^08,790. Smolto (innlnlorH for IGGmm aliclla, 
loono, KdRcwond Arnonal, Hd. 

C,olHnH Hndio Co,, Collar Ilnplils. lown. 
S1,4G!),118, Alrcrnfl 11 a v (Rational nets, 
ijciliii- Hn]lds. Army Electronic!) Com- 
mand, Kort Monmoutli, N.J. 

-(.cnernl Motorn, Clcvolnnd, Ohio. $S,R'!0,- 
f>M. Kx tension of production enalnccrlnR 
Bcrvlccs In support of tho in-moral rccon- 
nalBanniio nlrbornc iiBHault vehicle MGfil, 
(icncrnl Klicrldan. Clcvchuid. Army Wcan- 
omi Command, Hock Islnntl, III. 

Ucnornl Dytiainlcn Corn., Pomona Onllf 
W,8B,182. KY 1007 Rciloyo wonronH ays- 
turn onKimiurinir itorvlcea. Pomnnn, Army 
i,.., lo ., ( " tm """l. Hunlavlllo, Aln. 

--1,1 h I'.lpctronlfH, Huston, Mam,. $2,102,820, 
NavlKallon (id!,. Danvorn, Mmm. Army 
'.IcntronlcH Command, Phlladcljihla, Pa. 

C.omlcc {,orii., ainmfor.l, Conn, $fi,041,3,')B. 
] . l-toii traulor trucks. Stamford. Army 
lank Automotive 0nlcr, Warron, Mich. 

Hecch Aircraft Corp., Wichita, Kan. $0,- 
'"'Mint, Utility nil-craft. Wichita. Army 
Avlntlon MnlorM Command, St. Lou la. Mo. 

~"M , i^ llft ', Il f c ",, Ilj Mll " l(J . Onllf. $n.oa,oao, 

Mi'tnlllij belt links for 20mm ciirtrldne 
h\ Monte. I''rnnkford Araannl, Pn. 

NAVY 

1 IntrrHlatu rllcrtronico Corp., Annliolm 

; allf. $G,K5fl,000. Test InBlrimiontnllon on 
1 10 Pojioidnn mlBiillo. AnnheJm, SrHJclnl 
I'l-ojccln Olllco. 

8 R.C.A., Onnidcn, N.J. $1 0,785, IQfl. Mnn- 
nKomcnl, iipcrnllon, malnlcnanya and imp- 
port of tin- Atlantic Undersea Tost and 
'.valuation Uimtor for Ihrco yunni. An- 
ii-oii Islnnd In tho Hahnmns. Naval Ship 
Syntomii ('ommnnd. 

Y ''l Corp., Ym-k, Pa. Sl.oaiUHfl. 12 re- 

frlKjirnlor air condition I UK mills for in- 
Hlallalimi on naval nliiim. Ym-lt. Nnval 
HmpFt Sysloiini C'ommiuid. 

()- -Norlli Amorirnn Avlntlon, Oolumlius, Ohio. 
?H,71il,000. Work on tlio (londrn- mlfmllo 
nytilcm. $H,027,80H. Convornlon of A-fiA 
nlrei-nfl lo ItA-fiC! coniliturnlton. Cnlum- 
lmn. Nnvnl Air HyHlcmn (Jommiind. 

-Nor Hi American Aviation, Anaheim, Onllf. 
?l,4fi7,()2l. Cumiionoiitii of linmhlu,c nnd 
nnvlitntioii nytitems for nircraft. Anaholm. 
Navy Aviation Supply Oincc, Philailcliihia, 
Pn, 

Lit (on HyslcniH, Woodlnnd Hllln, Onlif. 
$C,I)7(l,J)()fi. ComponcnlH for nli-crnft nnvl- 
Kiition ayatem. Witoilland Hltln. Nnvnl Air 
Hyntcmii Commanil. 

-)>auKlnH Aircraft, LOUR Henoh. Onllf. $fl,. 
l.iii,-IOII. Homb rnnlcH nml ndnpter tills. 'I r or- 
i-iiiico, (-alif. Nnvnl Air SyutotiiH Oommnnd. 

May Aliimlnnm, 101 Onmpo, Tex. $1,07S,7I10. 
Ilcplnecment mat and pnlliit nnnnmhllcu for 
AM- 2 alrili'ld mnlUnit. Kl (Jampo. Navy 
Air KnKlnocrlnir Contor. Philadelphia, Pn. 

H -United Alrcrnft, Wimliior Locks, Oonn. 
$2,1110.002, Propollor nyslcimi for 0-180 
aircraft, Windimr Locks. Nnvnl Air Hyii- 
lomii Oominnml. 

-Knyllieon Co,, LoxinRlon, Mniui. $0,000,000. 
LOUR lend llmo mnlcrlnls ami effort for 
Sparrow mhrnllcs for tho Air Force, Low- 
oil, MnHH. Nnvnl Air Ryolcmn Command. 
- (trninmnn Alrcrnft KntflriocHinr Corp., 
KulhpaHO, L.I,, N.Y, $12,000,000, LOUR 
lend llmo norviccii nnd mippttan in nupport 
of PY 00 proouromcnl o( EA-OI1 nh-ornfl. 
HothpHKo, Nnvnl Air Synlcmn Command, 

12 Sperry ttyroneoim Co., Syoimol, L,!., N.Y. 

$1.070,000. NnvlRnllon control consoleH for 
Hiitimnrltio innrtlal nnvlRatlon iiyutcmn. 
Syonnut. Nnvnl Blilp Syntomn Qommand. 
--llnttetl Alrcrnfl, Knst Hartford, Conn. $2,- 
103,000. Simro PrU for JM-WE-Bd/Bfl 
nlrcrnfl. Enat Ilnrtford, Nnvy Avlntton 
Supply Office, Plillndolplila, Pn. 

IB-CJenornl Electric, WnnhlnKlon, D.O. (5,671,- 
174. Oiiorntlonnl mipport onKlticorhiK aorv- 
Icca for Polnria MKBO/MK84 Dro control 
nyiitcma nnd for aupport cqulpmont for 
Polnria (Iro control synloma nnd Polaris 
MK1/MK2 (riildnnco nyalomn, PltUflold, 
Mmm. Special I'rojeola Office. 
Newport NOWH BlitpbuildliiK 1 & Dry Dock 
Co,, Newport NOWB, Vn, (lfl,GOO,018. Pro- 

43 



pulalon plant components. Newport News, 
Nnval Ship Systems Command. 
14 General Dynamics Corp., Groton, Conn. 
51,000,000. Overhaul and refueling of the 
Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarine USS 
Alexander Hamilton (SSBN-617). Groton. 

Genernl Ship and Engine Works, Inc., 
Boston, Mass. $4,676,020, Construction of 
C landing craft, utility (LCU). East Hoa- 
ton, Mass. Naval Ship Systems Command. 
IB Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock 
Co., Newport News, Va. $3,000,000. Over- 
haul and refueling of the fleet ballistic 
missile, submarine USS Thomns Jefferson 
(SSBN-618). Newport News. Naval Ship 
Systems Command. 

18 Westinghouse Electric, Baltimore, Md. 316.- 
836,680. Long lead time items for the MK 
48 torpedo. Baltimore. Naval Ordnance 
Systems Command. 

Douglas Aircraft, Long Beach, Calif. JS,- 
G32.G74. Spare parts for aircraft ord- 
nance racks, Long Beach. Navy Aviation 
Supply Office, Philadelphia, Pa. 

AAI Corp., Coekeysville, Md. $1,666.359. 
Gun mounts for assault support patrol 
bonts. Cookeysvlllo. Naval Ordnance Sys- 
tems Command. 

General Electric, Cincinnati, Ohio. $1,046,- 
113. Parts for J79-GE-10 engines, Gin- 
cinnnti. Navy Aviation Supply Office, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

Cameron Iron Works, Houston, Tex. $1,- 
33E,5G8, Igniter assemblies and spare parts 
for the Terrier missile. Houston. Naval 
Ordnance Plant. Louisville, Ky. 

Willamette Iron & Steel Co., Portland, 
Ore. Sl.082,000. Overhaul and repair of 
the oiler USS Chlpola (AO-63). Port- 
land. Industrial Manager, 13th Naval 
District, 

19 General Electric, Cincinnati, Ohio. $5,232,- 
944. Spare parts for J70GEIO engines for 
F-4J aircraft. Cincinnati. Navy Aviation 
Supply Office, Philadelphia, Pa. 

Bell Aerospace Corp., Port Worth, Tex. 
$4,476,337. Hub assemblies, rotary bladea 
and transmissions for UH-1E aircraft, 
Fort Worth. Navy Aviation Supply Office, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

Curtiss Wright Corp,, Wood-Ridge, N.J. 
$2,916,314. Spare parla for R1820 and 
R3350 aircraft engines. Wood-Ridge. 
Navy Aviation Supply Office, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

20 McDonnell Aircraft, St. Louis, Mo. 31,248,- 
900. Strut assemblies for F-4 aircraft. St. 
Louis. Navy Aviation Supply Office, Phil- 
adelphia, Pa. 

21 Curtlss-Wright Corp., Wood-Hldge, N.J. 
$2,163,469. Components for aircraft en- 
gines. Wood-Ridge. Navy Aviation Supply 
Office, Philadelphia, Pa. 

Glannlni Controls Corp., Fairfleld, N.J. 
81,839,521. Components of air data com- 
puter systems for aircraft. Fairfleld. Navy 
Aviation Supply Office, Philadelphia, Pa. 
22 Hainan Aircraft Corp., Colorado Springs, 
Colo, $1,210,870. Research & development 
on the Polaris missile re-entry system. 
Colorado Springs. Special Projects Office. 
23 North American Aviation, Columbus, Ohio. 
Jl.044,800. Overhaul and conversion of 
T-28A aircraft to a modified T-38B con- 
figuration, Columbus, Nnval Air Systems 
Command. 

Hughes Aircraft, Culver City, Calif, S82,- 
000,000. Installation funding for the 
Phoenix missile system, Culver City. 
Naval Air Systems Command, 
20- United Aircraft, East Hartford, Conn. S70,- 
157,633. TF-SO-P-8 engines. $4,075,780. 
J62-P-8A engines. East Hartford. Naval 
Air Systems Command. 

Sperry Bond Corp., Unlvac Dlv., St. Paul, 
Minn. $4,700,000. Tactcal data systems. St. 
Paul, Naval Ship Systems Command. 

Sperry Gyroscope Co., Syosset, L.I., N.Y. 
81,444,690. Computer modification kite for 
Installation aboard Polaris submarines, 
Syosset. Naval Ship Systems Command, 

WestlnghowsB Electric, Baltimore, Md. 
$11,618,234. Airborne radar Gets for the 
Air Force. Baltimore. Naval Air Systems 
Command. 

27 United Aircraft, Stratford, Conn. 81,636,- 
000. Initial aparea for GH-53A aircraft. 
St r ! fl ",rd. Navy Aviation Supply Office, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

-~J'TV Aerospace Cor t>" Dallas, Tex, $1,422,- 
OB6. Procurement and fabrication of neces- 
sary parts for the F-8E aircraft modiftca- 
tton program. Dallas. Naval Air Systems 
Command. 

~k !t n t ??. S ?' fltema [ Ine - Silv Spring, Md. 
(2,007,33*. Radar Jammers and related 
equipment. College Park, Md. Nnval Air 
Systema Gomraand,. 

44 



PRO Electronics, Inc., Westbury, N.Y. 
1,300,000. Research and development on 
avionics shop test equipment. Westbury. 
Naval Air Systems Command. 

Loral Electronics Systems, Bronx, N.Y. 
51,309,469. Design, development nnd fab- 
rication of test models of radio receiving 
equipment. Bronx. Naval Air Systems 
Command. 

Parzen Research, Inc., Westbury, L.I., N.Y. 
51,544,024. Receiver muttlcouplers with 
miniaturized antenna and repair parts for 
installation on naval surface ships. West- 
bury. Naval Ship Systems Command. 
38- Aerojet General Corp., Azuso, Calif. 81,- 
142,400. Accessories for use In air drop 
of torpedoes. Azusa. Naval Ordnance Sys- 
tems Command. 

Tracor, Inc., Austin, Tex. $1,881,234. Chaff 
dispensers. Austin. Naval Air Systems 
Command. 

29 United Aircraft, East Hartford, Conn. 
3,843,244. Spare parts to support the J-48 
engine on the F-OF fighter aircraft. East 
Hartford. Navy Aviation Supply Office, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

Clevite Corp., Cleveland, Ohio. 81,704,800. 
Investigation and preliminary development 
of a guidance and homing system adapt- 
able to the MK 48 torpedo weapon system. 
Cleveland. Naval Ordnance Systems Com- 
mand. 

Dlrllyte Co. of America, Kokomo, Ind. $2,- 
323.GOO. Fin blades for 2.7G-lnch rocket 
motors, Kokomo. Navy Ships Parts Con- 
trol Center, Mechanicsburg, Pa. 
30 Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Sunny- 
vale, Calif. 5,402,688. Facilities required 
for the fabrication, engineering, test nnd 
check-out of Poaefdin development mis- 
siles. 2,491,205. Data reduction and data 
processing facilities for Poseidon. $1,210,- 
582. Polaris A-3 missile support equip- 
ment. Burbank, Calif. Special Projects 
Office. 

United Aircraft Corp., Stratford, Conn. 
!3,8C9,81G. CH-3E and HH-3E helicopters 
for the Air Force. Stratford. Naval Air 
Systems Command. 

I.T.T., Paramus, N.J. S1.8B8.407. Computer 
systems programs for the Fleet Computer 
Program Center, Atlantic. Dam Neck, Va. 
Navy Purchasing Office, Washington, D.C. 

Goodyear Aerospace Corp., Akron, Ohio. 
1,050,000. Production of units of radar- 
scope Interpretation trainer devices. Akron. 
Nnval .Training Device Center, Orlando, 
Fla. 

Douglas Aircraft Co., Long Beach, Oalif, 
820,073,872. TA-4E aircraft. Long Beach. 
Naval Air Systems Command. 

AIR FORCE 

1 General Electric, Cincinnati, Ohio. $4,- 
860,000. Design, investigation and feasi- 
bility demonstration of a high stage load- 
ing gns turbine engine, 4,231,000. De- 
velopment work on a high temperature gas 
turbine engine. Cincinnati. Systems Engi- 
neering Group, Research & Technology 
Div., (AFSC), Wright-Patterson AFB, 
Ohio. ' 

Honeywell, Inc., Hopkins, Minn. $8,BC9,- 
404. Production of aircraft bomb compo- 
V^mlnv ? 1 ? 8 ; -Aeronautical Systems Div., 
(AFSC), Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. 

2 -Boeing Co., Wichita, Kan. 1,210,914, Sta- 
bility and flight control system evaluation 
program for B-B3 aircraft. Wichita. 
Oklahoma City Air Materiel Area, (AFLC), 
Tinker AFB, Okla. 

Pnirchlld Hillcr Corp., Farmlngdale, N.Y. 
81,087,800. Engineering and production of 
modification kits and spare parts for 
F-106 aircraft. Far mined ale. Sacramento 

A *fi at i Iel Area ' ( AFLG )> McClellan 
AFB, Calif. 

Aircraft Hydroforming, Inc., Gardena, 
Calif. 81,274,728. Production of aircraft 
pylon bomb rack asesmhlles. Qardena, 
Sacramento Air Materiel Area, (AFLO). 
McClellan AFB, Oallf. ' 

General Dynamics, San Diego, Calif. $!,- 
600,000, Production, Integration and launch 
of space vehicles. San Diego. Ballistic- 
Systems Dlv,, (AFSC), Norton AFB, 
Calif. i 

General Electric, Waynesboro, Va. 1,OG8,- 
000. Production of electrical equipment for 
C-141 aircraft. Waynesboro. Aeronautical 
Systems Div., (AFSC), Wright-Patterson 
AFB, Ohio, 

Westlnghouse Electric Corp., Baltimore, 
Md. 2,000,000. Engineering services ond 
production of electronic counter-measure 
equipment. Baltimore. Aeronautical Sys- 



tems Div., (AFSC), Wright-Patterson 
AFG, Ohio, 

Westinghouse Electric Corp., Baltimore, j 
Md. 52.200,000. Production of low fre- 
quency sets, Baltimore. Electronic Sys- 
tems Dlv., (AFSC), L. G. HanBcom Field, 
Mass. 

North American Aviation, Los Angeles, 
Calif. $1,650,000. Development work on 
a vertical take-off and landing (VTOLJ 
aircraft, tos Angeles. Systems Engineer- 
ing Group, Research & Technology Div., 
(AFSC), Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. 
6 North American Aviation, Canoga Park, 
Calif. $2,210,001. Work on a. development 
program for high performance rocket 
engines. Canoga Park. Air Force Flight 
Test Center, Edwards AFB, Calif. 

North American Aviation, Anaheim, Calif. 
$2,500,000. Spare parts for the Mlnuternnn 
guidance control system. Anaheim. Osrdon 
Air Materiel Aren, (AFLC), Hill AFB, 
Utah. 

Sylvania Electric Products, W tilth am, 
Mass. 81,000,000. Technical manuals for 
ground electronic systems. Buffalo, N, Y., 
Ncedham nnd Waitham, MUSH. Ballistic 
Systems Div., (AFSC), Norton AFB, Calif, 

United Aircraft, West Prilm Beach, Fla. 
$2,005,001. Work on a development nro- 
gram for high performance rocket en- 
gines. West Palm Beach, Fla. Air Force 
Flight Test Center, Edwards AFH, Culif. 
7 General Electric, Syracuse, N.Y. $l,3Efi,253. 
Design nnd fabrication of iidvnnceil bal- 
listic missile guidance equipment. Syra- 
cuse. HnlHstic Systems Div., (AFSC), 
Norton APR, Calif. 

8 General Electric, Philadelphia, Pn, 51,600,- 
000. Flight testing of the Maneuvering 
Ballistic Re-entry Vehicle, Philadelphia. 
Ballistic Systems Dlv., (AFSC), Norton 
AFB. Calif. 

Applied Technology, Inc., Palo Alto, Cjillf. 
81,803,012. Electronics systems for F-IOB 
aircraft. Palo Alto. Warner Robins Air 
Material Aron. (AFLC), Robins AFB, Gfi. 

Sundstrand Corp., Rockford, III. $1,446,357. 
Production of enRine starter ctu-Lrlitaca 
for F-4 aircraft. Itockford, Aeronnutieal 
Systems Div., (AFSC), Wright-Patterson 
AFB, Ohio. 

United Aircraft, East Hartford, Conn. 
$1,003,045. Production of ayare parla 
for R-43CO aircraft engines, $1,020,000, 
Research work on a supersonic mm jut 
engine. East Hartford. San Antonio Air 
Materiel Area. (AFLC), Kelly AFH, Tex. 

Dynalectron Corp., Fort Worth, Tax. $1.- 
000,000. Repair nnd maintenance of F-4C 
aircraft. George AFB, Calif. Oklahoma 
City Air Materiel Area, (AFLC), Tinker 
AFB, Olcla. 

Fnlrchild Corp., Farmlngdale, L.I,, N.Y. 
?l,854,fl8fi. Modification and flight teatinp 
of the F-10G aircraft to nccomotlato Hie 
Walleye missile. Fnrminndale. Sacramento 

4iV,, M ^ t P vIcl At ' on ' (AFLC), McOhllnn 
AFB, Calif. 

IS Spacecraft, Inc., Hunlsvlllo, Aln. $1,600,- 
000. Work on tha Titan III Instrumenta- 
tion system. Huntsvillo. Space Systems 
Div., (AFSC), Los Angeles, Cnlif. 

AlRcncarch Mfg. Co., Phoenix, Aria, S3,- 
7G0.000. Production of gas turbine- en- 
gines. Phoenix. Oklahoma City Air Ma- 
teriel Area, (AFLC), Tinker AFO, Ohio. 

~~H n ^ cd Afr craft, Enst Hartford, Conn. 
51,200,710. Spare parts for J-67 aircraft 
engines. Enst Hartford. San Antonio Air 
Materiel Area, (AFLO), Kelly AFB, Tex. 

General Electric, Arkansas City, Knn. 
52,003,471. Overhaul of J-86 nlrcraft -en- 
gines. Arkansas City. Oklahoma City Air 
Materiel Aren, (AFLC), Tinker AFB, 
Okla, 

Sundstrnnd Corp., Itockford, III. 1,HM1,- 
014, Production of spare parts for electri- 
cal generators for C-14I aircraft, Rock- 
ford. Oklahoma City Air Materiel Area, 
(AFLC), Tinker AFB, Okla. 
13 Ryan Aeronautical Co., San Diego, Calif. 
$4,500,000. Aerial target drones nnd sup- 
port equipment. Sim Diego, Aeronautical 
Systems Dty.i- (AFSC), Wright-Patterson 
AFB, Ohio. 

Lockheed Missiles & Space Co,, Sunny- 
vale, Calif, $1,028,876, Engineering sup- 
port for the Agena booster system. Sunny- 
vale. Space Systems Div., (AFSO), L-oa 
Angoles, Calif, 

Boclntr Co., Seattle, Wash. $2,000,000. 
Aerospace ground equipment, .snares, tech- 
nical publications and data In support of 
Minuteman II programs. Seattle. Ballistic 
Systems Dlv., (AFSO), Norton AFB, 
Calif, 

October 1966 



14- 




-(iiiry Aircraft Cnrii., VlrhiHn, Tex. ijl,- 
laa.OftH. IiiinuTl Ion ami n-iinlr mi n<<frii- 
flnry "' (I-B-i alm-nfl. Vlrlin'iu. Warner 
Itobinii All- Mnli-rltO Ami, |Al<'J,d). It.i1.liu> 
Al-'H, 'in. 

Hollo Alrrrnft tlnrii., Hllnhm 1 -', KIIII. ?l,- 
KIIU.IHIO, U-HID iiliri'itft. rilliilmrir, An'n- 
nautical Kyiilrmii Iliv., (ATiHI'l, Wi'lttlil- 
1'iilloiwm A FH, Olili>, 
Hiidiili <!".. Wli'lilln. Kan. Sl.'IVIi, 
ii, ]ii'i>ilni'Mi)ii ami lull i>f ii in'iicr 



WM)!i!r A ,' r T fl ' Clll vr City, Ojvllf. 81,. 
cm I i i 1 ."" 1 "-' 1 ''"!! iioi'vleoa fin- tt'iitiiiK 

A r ir fl M 'I 011 ,'","",' 1 A HI, N.M. n< Hnn" Antnliln 
/Hi^ MuUTlL'l Anm, (AFLC), Kolly AFII. 

" H mjn <: !J <; "r ill> WIlmhiKlon, MIIIIII. g.'l.OOO,- 
' T Vi," ', T vHlIl ' lc t w ]inol(Ky. WllmiiiR- 

!."!' i!' . Hl i ;,,^"" !i "" Uiv - * Ara0 '- N I - 



Al 1 '.t|r, 1 ,n. " , 

A In. 8.!,HJfii)o, Iiii,,, i:i .|i ,, an.l ruimtr n. 

1 1 'V" ry ( AN > (lf (1 -1!'" alrornfl. IH r - 

A, I'v'i.i^:"' 1 !" 1 ' ll<llli " 11 Air MuLor-M 
Aii'i, (AH,C), n (l |,| ni| An , (i|l] 

IHM-litK (.., Kciillli., Wimli, |2,tl1.l!lH!. 

' 



Doiifjcii, iinnlni'MiHi ami Ivul i'f n in'in-nilur nli'nl imMtciilionii itml ilnta 'in in liiiin-t f 

HViiti'iii fm 1 M--rr.! ali-rrafl. Wli-hlln. Ol>lti lln> Mlnnl.-irian [| i.ro-train Hi-iilllt Mr.lll'I 

], <'I'V Air M rl,l A, ,AM.<M, r|, S y ,,,,., '^f 'H( ') , "^Si;, ' AH'; 

TliiKi'i* Al- Hi niiiii, i '11111, 



111 - 



uiiltor Al'-'H, nliln, 

. Fnl rr III 111 lllltiT (Idi'ii,, l-'in'iiilnmlitli'. N.V 

s.|.i:M,(Hii>. I'liiKliK't-rlmr ili'iil-m 'vli-.'ii 

r.-liili'il l<i tin- l-'-llllil) nliTvnft- Miu-i'ii u<n 

Air Miili'i-h-1 Aiva, (AI-'I.IU, Mcdli-llnu 

AFH, (Jnllf. 

Mllr l-"i']i,, Ili'tifunl. Mini". SlIi.limi.M":!. 

llrMi'iii'<-li 'Uiil ili'vi'lii'nili'lll fur iiVnlcin en- 

ultii'Ci-lnit au<l h'l'linlnil illi'rrlluii lit llli' 

(Irlil nf iiiiiniiiiiiiil anil rniilrol iivulrinn, 

lliiitfonl. l^i'i-h'inil.- Syntfinii UK-,. (AI-'MIH, 

I,, (i, llmmi'i'iil Mi'l'l, Mnmi, 

Hill (oil 'IVrlllliiltiBV (Iriitrr, Hiiiiuv vi\\ i\ 

Clillf, Sl,il;!H.llllll. I'mi'iii-f nl .if TITAN 

III Maiiii'-il Ui-hlllnii I.almi'iil'M'y (Mill.) 
Idiitt li-iul liiil'ilwnri' ti'f ni'ltil I'lirlo-l liKili<i'ii, 

Hiinnvvnlt 1 . H|ui<->' ilynlr IMv,, (Al'';i<!), 

I, mi Autd'li'ii, I'allf, 

linir HIi'Klcr. Inc., Ilinilii Mmilca, thill/. 

j;vt7;<, -triii, ri'<niiii-ii r i'i>iii]niiu<iiiii ( .f 

a til nil I i-diih'nl vnli'in in ii|i|ini'l ii iiinna 
Dlliiiilli'. Miuila Mi'iili-ii, Aci IMNIII Ili-iil Mvn- 
l.min Dlv., (AI'MM), Wi lulil- I'nll.-i F.IMI 
AFH, Oliln. 

Hen ill* rnr|i., Tiiit'i'lmni, N.,1, 8',!.Jri(l.!!HH. 
Nnvluntloniil <'iiriii>iilrr iwtn d>r I-' -I air 
enifl, 'IVIiirliin'ii. Ai-nntiiiti It-nt !iyn|i>nin 
Itlv., (Al-'!llt), Wrlithl'l'iilifrrnni, AMI. 

dViiirnl Dlci-lrlr, lliirlliiiiliiii, V(. 81.111,- 

()!!!!. MiHU-n iniriu fui' nli'i'iiih mi-mm'-ui, 
HlirltiiKlnn, Wnriii-i' llnlilnn Air Miilmli'l 
A ITU, {A1-'l,(!}, Itol-lnn AMI, (in. 
Culler Hnnmirr, Inr, Mci-i- I'tirli, [,,!,, N,V 

$l,llllll ( li|}|), Wiii'Ii "ii a Illiihl Ir'M mum 

fin- iivi'rliiiiil vailiir iiyli'iii'i, tlrrr I'urii, 
(lyiitrpiin Miiiilni-'-rliiK (in.uii. Id it-iurl! ft 
'IVnliiiiil-iity Dlv., (AI'KIM, WHulil -I'mim^ 
H..II Al-'il, (thin, 

-Unlli'il Alrrrnfi, Mnm lliii'tfi'i'il, Mha, 

J-G7, J-'/fi, nil'.r'Vi'l'lir ai?.'"'^''" 1 ,'^,!.''.' 
l^i'il Iltii'lfui-it, linn Aniniiln Air Mi.l-i<cl 
Ami. IAH,m, ullv A HI. 'IV*. 

Hyiili'lliit Dlv,, (AI-'IIUl, Wrli(li|.rrill.'in.!ii 
Al-'ll, (lliJo, 

IloflliK ('., Mt-nlllc, Witnli, 5 l.l^;!.HIH1, 
I'riiiliit-llnii nf ri.nui)iiUH(n fn- n i-.Li.itmi 
[rinv Intlni'i' n yii i.. m I,, (1 ,i|'l>nM ,,( On- 
Mlmih'iiihH inlanll.i. Ht-nitlf ilu.l.-u Ale 
Mnt(!i-I..| Aim, (Al'I.Ct. Hill Al II, Utnli. 
illfd (.nr|i,, I'nl,, All... l^tillf, l!,(HH,Hi;, 
Wrirh >i n nnli-Ittln e<m\r,,l iiiw,iil,. 



, .,, 

jljjfijt I'^ltlly, IAKHU1, U, 



'" r(t " (;illl ' ( W"- "I, 81.. 
. n.iu.-li.n .f rlBrn-.Mil.' p,,,,!,,. 
fur 1-.|(! mill l-'-llll (rrrfi, rt,l,. Ml3< , 
HJ--IPHW |t|v., (Al-.SCl, 
iii AMI, llhl., 



Wklili, Wrliflu-U'wHi-i-rtnii AMt Itlij,. 
'Honeywell, Int.. It^t.m. Mtw, il.SJlii.^ 



28 Kn'lrrhlM 

'in 



n AMI. tthl 



IltlIl " 1 '<'lM. lUrrlnnii.n, III. 



I 1 ,.,; I".'' 1 " 11 ;.,' 1 ' 1 '! 1 , 1 ' 1 ' , 11111 ' 111 f' 1 ' 1 n-!i lyiiu iii'ii- 

M ,i,i i A " lfi ; 1 '. 11 ' Wl "' lll!1 ' Hiilihin Air 
MH|.|-|.,| An-a, |AI<'I.C). It,,],!,,,, AHI, <!. 

''''i" I'yiinnilrB, Jinn Dlrim llullf 87- 

I-." 1 ' 11 " 1 '- ATI,A;I/A<;KNA H\WH imi.mtn-n, 

>""> IH.-KII. ilium. HyHionm IHv.. (Al-'NC), 

"' An,:,-!,,!, Cnllf, 
-i ii.r mi ( Wfi-lilliL, Knii, Sl..tl)lMI(in. 

1 l,'!n , , I'', 1 , "' W* ll'fl. Wll-llitll, 

1 ', " 1 ", ll|l - v All- Mftli-i-lifl AI-OII 
IAI-I,(,) lltikn- AMI. Oltla. 

m'-' n \| ."'"f (r " T "" l'li"*!iilN. Ai-tv;. 31,til)n> 
l'ln"-iiK. Ai-i'iniiuiHi-nl Hj-nlonin Dlv 
i. i ' ^''^'''"I'l'Ht'i'iHiii AF]I, Oliln. 
.iiii)iiuii'i'n-( nrlnim Cnrn., llni-lii'Mlri-, N.Y. 
't...ii ii.llltl 'IVli'iilnirnj I'luiiniinili-aUiinti 
'I'lii'iMHit . t!iH-tiM||.|<. Olilntinmn City All- 
UUu ' lAFI ' () '' 'I'l'ilHT A I'll. 

1111 i { |".i l M, r " n |1 A ' 1 , ni " lflr ' < ; rn., Akriin, Olilo. 

Jl.iMi.MflH. Aln-nifl un -. Aknni. Wnrih-r 

Il-Miin Air Muli>rit>| Ami, (Al-'MJ). UiiMnti 
Al 1 II, (in. 



Smithsonian Gets 
WW II Documents 

Tliti Di'fi'inii! Di'inii'liniMit; hnsi InuiH- 
n-rri'il tiliiiut (1(1,110(1 cu|i(,unnl Win-Id 
Win- II .Tii|iMiii'j!<> un<! (JiTmiui ra- 
ifcitrrli ilui'iiinriil!! In tho Nulioiinl Air 
mill Mpnri' Muiiwmi of llio Hinilh- 
IIMI(IUI luiilllullim In WiuthlnitUin, 
1I.(\, wliorn (hoy will limioniu jiurt (if 

lilt' ItlHSI'Uni'll ItlWIMTll C'fUllOl' COl- 

nvtiiluhlo for utmly by v 



* tluninioiilu, wlilrh Iwvn lionu (E<t^ 

flfil nnil inlcriilllnii!!!, nro non- 

l iu illll) iwlu of lirinim fllin. Thny 

Iruiiiifct'rcil from tltft ])on>ium 



Vu, Tin* IritiiiifiT lucluiU'K tln-r 
pi'i thii'iit ntlaloK Dimlii. 



- 
AFD, Ohio. 



f 



Navy DSSP Office 
Relocated 

Tim II. .S. Nuvy'H ])f!('i) Kali- 

i'i'K'i'jin' .Synl''tnn Project f D.SKl') 
IIIIH ln'i-11 rclocuUid from iho Mu- 
H Hullilhix in downtown WiiHli- 
, I ).C., to ilm Hi'iulloy BuildiiiK, 
(Until WlitrtniHln Avo. ( N.W., I)ctiii>flu- 
(lii-vy C)uiHt\ Md. 

Tli' Piihlin Airnim Oflko (PAO) 
will Itn UiciiUxl ID Koom 701. Tempo- 
vnry tHf'iihnim numlwr for tho PAO 
oilier in (Ami Ootln JI01) (!fi7-1012. 

TlK! I*(t(*i Kulimm'Kcncn SyalniH 
PrnJHit Ofllrn IIIIH i>rinmvy reftjuoiiBl- 
tillily foi- thti inujor portion of POD 
oxiicnilituro in tlto ocean cnglncorintf 
area. 



Optical Mark Reader 

To Be Selected for 
USAF Headquarters 

Tho Electronic Dnt;i Procosslng 
Kqiupmont Ortlcn of tho Air Forco 
hyttUwiH Gonminiul'R Electronic! Sya- 
tom Division (KSD) pinna to RRlect 
an ontical marlt reader to b<- iiiatalloil 
ut tho Data Sorvicoa Cantor, IIoiul- 
quui-ttH-H, U.S. Air Force, Washington, 

Thin uquipiimiit will bn used to con- 
vert cinnHtlonnuirn data for aubswciuent 
omputRr prncfiHRlnir. Convorfllon of 
l-iMjOOO ritinHilonntiirnH in a .10-dny 
ixiriod |H n\v Jircoin]ilia]it!(] by a 
manual lsy nunch mnthocl. 

HfiniKiHtH for tfl(ihninl informntlon 
liiivo bfiim Hrtnt to thn follow! HR- AiinH: 
Control Data CJorp., Rurlin^toti, 
MnsH.; Diiltii AfiKociutoH, Ltd. Inc.. 
Nmv Orlcinm, T,u. : ForrnnU-Ponkurtl 
Klcctnc, Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Cium- 
Vi 1 ' "onornl Dyniunira, Loxlii 
MHHII.J ITtM, Cmnl>rUlff<i, MUSH.; 
tm-niitlonal Dnvolopmont 
Nnw^oi-k, N.Y.; T,!nh flv 
IriinHion Inc., nintflm 
optical .Scanning Corp., 
rn.i UCA, WnHhliiKton, D,C.; Ktiy- 
tlicon Oomimtor, Runtn Ana, Calif.; 
EtccuKnitlori Kquipniont, Inc., WaHhlnff- 
lon, IXC.; iLiid National Computer 
hyntoniB, MhineapoHa, Minn. 

KKD'n Mlw.tronlc Dnta l'rocofllnff 
hnujpnmnt ()nio, headed by Col. H. P. 
htoiruit, will ovaluitt< vendor rflHpoiiH^a, 
AequlHitlon of tho nnuiumnnt in ox- 
iMMitwl to Itn iittronmllHlicMl imdor iixlflt- 
liiif <iftnvul Hoi-vlco AdmlnEatration 



In- 



N.Y.; 
Hillfi, 



Western Electric Gets 

$256 Million Contract 

for Nike-X Research 

Tho Army IIIIH awurdcid a $2150,581,- 
(>ia (!onlviu!t to tlio Wowtora Mine trie 
<Io, for continued WHoarch ilovolop- 
moiit itnd toKlinK of thn Niko-X M!R- 
Kyuixun. 

I-]l<M!tric in tho primn con- 
oil tbn wyHtoin, Jiownvor, aov- 
ornl thousand firms in nearly overy 
iituti! in th<! union am Kxnuctod to 
fihnro in thn contract awni'dn an Hub- 
tionti'iictoi'd und vniulora. 

Tim contract cov(ira dnnl^n and iln- 
voloiuntint work on tho Nikc-X, tofitlnif 
of MVHtttMi (]Hipmcnt and related work 
at white Hancm MiHHlln RmiRo, M.M., 
and tint Niki!-X-opt!i'tttfld Kwajaloin 
Tout Silo In tlm Marnhnll IwltindH, 

Tim cont-plus-incfiiitlvo foo contract 
will cover work on thn (system for tlio 
pnrlod of Oct. 1. 1000, to Sept. HO, 
11)07. It dona not Include funcls for 
production or deployment oi tho 
By stem. 

Weatorn Electric Co. will perform 
work on tho eystom at Its plants in 
Burlington nrul Greensboro, N.C, 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20301 

OFFICIAL BUSINESS 



POSTAGE AND FEES PAID 




Missile Mentor Complex 
Undergoing Tests in Illinois 

The Army Air Defense Command (ARADCOM) has begun 
testing the first of a series of new command posts for improved 
coordination of surface-to-air missile (SAM) defense of American 
cities. The tests involve the Missile Mentor system (AN/TSQ-51), 
a computer-controlled, semi-automatic electronic complex that will 
harmonize battle actions of missile firing' units within a single 
defense. 

The first Missile Mentor has been installed at Arlington 
Heights, 111., in the Chicago-Milwaukee defense area. While it is 
being tested in the next several months before final acceptance by 
the Army, installation of Missile Mentors in the other selected 
defense areas will proceed. Missile Mentors will be substituted for 
all the remaining Missile Master and some of the BIRDIE (Battery 
Integration and Radar Display Equipment) systems now in use. 

Missile Mentor will significantly improve the coverage and 
effectiveness of Nike Hercules and Hawk missile defense while 
sharply cutting operating costs and reducing manpower needs. It 
will increase the reliability, flexibility and effectiveness of coordi- 
nationthe command and control of the separate missile batteries 
in a defended area. 

The new system is the first to use a general purpose computer 
for coordination of Army air defense units. The computer makes 
it possible for the Missile Mentor to give commanders more com- 
plete target data than they have ever had on which to base their 
battle decisions. 

Missile Mentor's modular design makes it possible to enlarge 
its coverage. Remote Radar Integration Stations (RRIS) can be 
satellited on the basic system for that purpose. These remote sta- 
tions are an innovation which makes it possible to "net" additional 
radars located at great distance from the command post into the 
overall surveillance coverage. An RRIS can be converted to use as 
a command post. 

Until the tests are completed by ARADCOM, the user of the 
new system and the U. S. Army component of the North American 
Air Defense Command (NORAD), regular air defense operations 
in the various defense areas involved will continue to be managed 
from the existing command centers. Missile Mentor will provide a 
vital link between Army Air defense units and other elements of 
NORAD. 



AFLC Tests 

Early Buying 

of Repair Parts 

The Air Force Logistics Com- 
mand has initiated a test pro- 
gram to determine feasibility of 
purchasing certain long-lead- 
time, partially prefabricated air- 
craft engine parts prior to their 
actual requirement. The objec- 
tive of the program is to pro- 
vide a more ready response to 
changes in requirements at min- 
imum cost and to provide earlier 
response to emergency require- 
ments. 

San Antonio Air Materinl 
Area, Kelly APB, Tex., has be- 
gun buying 1 a limited number of 
selected items. 

The "buffer stock" concept 
will normally be used only for 
items costing less than half the 
total cost of the finished product 
and having production lead time 
for conversion to the finished 
product of less than half the 
total lead time. 

Present service testing of the 
concept is limited primarily tc 
castings, forgings and othei 
semi-finished items for jet en- 
gines no longer in production, 

If the program objectives o1 
better support at equal or les: 
cost can be attained with the lira 
ited scope of items initially se 
lected, application of the concep 
may be expanded. 



IN THIS ISSUE 

T|> Dormua Materials System and Priorities 

the DOD and 



A common defense mnrkot ..... ..................................... 8 

f^' 1 , ^ f ntiiro Wuiwminte^d Tii"a/;"Nfl" c "i"";:::::: JJ 

Kornml Advertising Over the Hurdles II 

jr and Shipment of DBBBWOUB Materials -i"!"!""."" 3fl 

DKPAUTMKNTS 

About People" ............. 

"""""" 




. 

Speakers Calendar ............. ".".""^." 

Mootlna and Symposia ........... ] , 

From tho Sneakers nostrum .. ...................................... 



25 



DISTANT SECRETARY OF 
AFFAIRS 




The Defense Materials System 



"o. 



0* 



In view of tho many queried from defense industry on the priorities and al- 
locadanN proccdiirea of (ho Defense Materials System (DMS), tho BuslnGss and 
Defeiiflo Services Administration, U. S, Dopartmont of Commerce, which udmm- 
iatera the program, wna Invited to prepare an article for tho Bulletin. The 
article which explains the purpose and operation of DMS begins on nago 1 of 
tlilfl IMS lie, 

A complementary article, describing tho use of DMS and priorities by the 
Defense Department and defense-related agencies, begins on page 8, 



Device for Curing Dust Damage 

K a jet-propelled Army j(!ep, Hie Air l ( 'orcc's OMice of Aero- 
space Research (OAK) is testing' a new device in Ari/uiia which 
liO|)cfully will provide protection aj'.'ainst the ill ell'ei'ls nf dust mi 
helicopters, trucks and other machinery in Vietnam where Ihe 
situation is becoming; a major problem. 

Tho device, a clustered parl.ielo separator, was moulded mi Ihe 
air intake of the modified M- Ifil jeep durinj 1 ; teals by scii-uli:;!:; 
at the Aerospace Research Laboratories (AIM.), \Vri|ih! Tallrrsnn 
A I' 1 ! I, Ohio. 

After a series of preliminary experiments al \Y'rij:hl I'alti'rsoii, 
the jeep was llown to Ari/ona where it was subjected tn dry drier! 
<lust to.sts. 

Tho separaLor was devised by Dr. Mans .1, I', von Oluiin. I'hief 
scientisl; and senior research leader in Ihe Altl* enenM'iie:; labm-a 
tory. Designed to jtrevenl, <'rosion of Ilie compressor section in the 
engine and jvlass formation on Ihe eni'.ine';; 1ml surface:;. Ihe si'pa 
rator removes dust particles and nlher foreijin objccl,-. I'nmi ilu> 
air before, they can be sucked into Hie enj'.ine. 

Wstinmtes show Hint maintenance, inclndinjv replacriiH-nl 
injfH and completi^ (injvines, on various jet aircrafl encini'.'; 
by dust inja'stion in Vietnam la.Ml year cost SHiO millinn, 

Tim Air Korce hopes (hat Ihe du:i| prolilem will lie ;in|v 
the, development of the separator, which should n'slurc 
|nm of aircraft engines ID a level conijiaralile lo Ihat nf 
nndor normal conditions, 



New Helicopter Radar System 
Developed and Flight Tested 

A unique and potentially revolutionary helicopter radar .-i.v.'ih'iii 
has he.en developed and Ilinht tested to increasi- Ihe capability il' 
a helicopter to lly at ninht and in fojwy wenlher. 

Tho dovnlopnuMit was accomplished under tin- lonj- rmif,- Juini 
Army-Navy IiiMtrumentaUon Research {.IANAIK) l'riij;rain. under 
way for .several yearN. which has the objcclive of iniprnviiiK nnd 
HimplifyiiiK cockpit iiiMtrumenlalinn display systems in lixnl-wiiiK 
aircraft and holicoplors. The radar prnjtrani is adminisleretl by 
the Olllco of Naval ReMcarcJi, 

Tho .system, which WUN developed by Hell Ilelicnpter, ('..., l-'nrt 
Worth, Tox., with Hpodal radar efjuipnuuit provided by MVxiut 
IiiHtruimMiU, Inc., Dallas, Tex., does IHI| re.pilrn a computer. m.< 
clmnical compoiH^nt.s, or a servo Hysti-m for il;i o|irralinii This 
incroascH HIES .syufem'H roliability and mainlainabilily and yhv'i it 
l,ho rUM-Kcdnes.s [o .survive in a combat I'livironmenl'. The receiver 
and Hwmsp generator aro all-trnn-sisLitri/ed units. 

Flight; U'Ht.i have demount raU'd that confrasl between object 
and (hncnnfr iomuiiH i .such that almost pictorial Knmnd iimit'iiiim 
jusnlLs, Lfirjfe or exLondcd objcct.s, such an tiirptirl, runwiivn or 
hiKhwayH, aro unmlHlakablo and piloU, aided by nlmios, churlM, or 
in-ovioua knowlod^o, can readily identify olnntern of ireen bitild- 
nijCH, or oil timlw. Tho display lubo, which IH a dirceUviuw MttmiKu 
tube, ftlao cnn provide a hiRh L-^ohition Udcvmidii niciura if a 
television input IB 




Mini. lditti>rt S. McNinnnru 

Smvlnry of 
linn. Cynin It. Vance 

Ui-IMily Hrt'i-i'liiry of 
MUM, AiMiur Sylvt-nliT 

ivliM'y nf 



Col. .furl II, Stt'iilti-iin, USA 
IHn'i'tm t'nr ('iniuniinily 
Col, Kiluht ('. (ill.M.ni, UHA 

Cltli-l', |li|.,|ni'!,-i & l.ulnir Divisic 

l-Mltnr I.t'.lr. M. W. ilnulfnnl.Ua 
A-MIIU-. Ktlfinr M|HH Cocllin 1'ollt 

\ nntn\ Ivdltttr Mr. Itlck I,n F n ]| 

MtlHiii in) Aurilhltinl 

NIMIIIIIII K. Wumt, ,101, US 



Tin- /iiV.-ii.),- I 
iu |nthli':)ifil itiniitlily tiy (1 

>'- l.uli.ir I livif.inM. n'iri'i'lfiruto f( 
I'l'iiiiniinily Ui'liitiiinti, (Hlli'O of if 
AM.tf.iiint ,'ln'ivtiiry nf Pi'fi'iiW! (1'ul 
Hi; Ati'iiif.-o. 1'n" nl ! fund!! for jiriiitir 
Ilii--. pnltlirnl ion wihi jippntvM liy tl 
hir-i-t'i! nf t)|i' Iliiiiuill (if til*! Illtllf[4 

Thit jiui'pi,!:^ M|" tin' /(ii/liiliii : 
f.i i:rrvn m. a hii'iiift "f t'limimuiicnlifl 
li-'Uvi-i-n fh.' Iti'iiiirtnii'iil, nf Utifciii 
ll'iihi uii'l if'i iiiitlmri'/i'il iitfiwli 
in ii I ifi'li'ii-:" I'Niili'urlui'ii mid ot!u 

tm;jlltr!!'l ltlI"IT'ihJ, ft. Will IH'l'Vf! [ 

ii ^n'<l' ; I" hi'hmhy I'lini'i'ViiiiiK ofl 
"in! |i,.ili'it';!, lu'njn'itiHii mill ]iroli)H 

!UI Will <;r-i-K I'l ntililllhllt! tllOlllfllt I) 

III'-IM|" - I > ni 1 (til- i|ff<'i)!ii' intlinliy loni 

in ;:,.!-, i;i|- the i.!''il-l.'Mt'i Ilial niiiy iirii 

in fullltliiif- thi' n'-|itltt'iiioiil!< nf tl 
htijt, 

-Mnh'i iul in On* HttlU'tin in k 
li'if. -tt ( t . litipjily jn'i'liit.'iil iincliifistflt 

fiiiHK'''^''!!^! from imliiBll 
hilix.'u fur (<i)tti'M tn tin M 1 
1'inl In Ciiiui.' i>i-ni''!i jilimilil 1m fo 



tlilrllmtil wltlioi 
'lini'K* nidi iiiuntti to rcprcHcnUtlvi 
.f hnluMry tunt l< n^itriPH of IhoD 
imriintMil. nf IH-friiH!'. Army, Nnvynf 
Al' Kui-iv. Hr-iM'-ulM fur nipk'Ji mm 

\t\' lit|ihi-n)i>'i| (f. Hi" HUHilHWl & IJJJK 

-K.m, tlASIMl'Al. Hnm zfff 

1M 



. 

r'|rlntfil fr^'ly wilhmit rnqucstw 
tiMit, Mt'hli.m tif tlio flourcowf 




By 
Anthony A. Bcrtsch 



In this year of 1966 the issue of 
war and peace still looms as a most 
important factor in the shaping of 
our national policies and administra- 
tive efforts. The world situation today 
demands many unprecedented efforts 
to insure our national security. 

The size and composition of our 
defense program dramatically sym- 
bolize such endeavors. Our involve- 
ment in Southeast Asia, the system 
of world-wide bases, the deployment 
of American forces in other parts of 
the world, foreign military aid, are 
a few other examples familiar to all 
Americans. There are other measures 
employed by the Government to pro- 
tect our national security, however, 
which make important contributions 
to this goal but which are much less 
familiar to the general public. One 
of these is the operation of the De- 
fense Materials System in our 
economy. 

Why the Defense Materials System is 
needed. 

The Defense Materials System 
(CMS) is a body of Government 
regulations, orders and procedures, 
issued under the authority of the 
Defense Production Act, designed to 
accomplish two main purposes. First, 
DMS is a means of directing the flow 
of materials and products to the 
nation's military, atomic energy and 
space production, construction .and re- 
search and development programs. 
These programs are referred to as 
"defense programs." DMS helps in- 
sure that defense programs are main- 
tained on schedule by providing a 
priority for the purchase of materials 
by contractors, subcontractors and 
their suppliers. Second, the operation 
of the system results in the mainte- 
nance of an administrative means of 
promptly mobilizing the total eco- 
nomic resources of the country in 
the event of war. 

The priorities provided under DMS 
are required to insure a timely flow 
of materials and components to the 
defense programs, atomic energy de- 
velopments, and programs for missile 
systems and space, In addition, the 
supplies and equipment needed to as- 



sure the combat effectiveness of our 
military forces in South Vietnam are 
obviously important to our national 
security. Other less obvious programs 
are also important to assure the se- 
curity of our nation. 

Considering the enormous sums 
appropriated for these purposes and 
recognizing the tremendous impor- 
tance of these programs in the light 
of the continuing world situation, 
the operation of DMS represents a 
very small premium which we are 
paying for a substantial insurance 
coverage. Even in times of generally 
ample supply, certain materials and 
components are relatively scarce for 
a variety of reasons. In some cases 
unusual specifications create supply 
difficulties, both with respect to mate- 
rials and the industrial facilities 
needed to process them. The situation 
with regard to ample supply of 
many materials or products may 
change overnight as a result of 
special situations such as strikes or 
international incidents. Fluctuations 
in the general economic situation may 
also affect the availability of materi- 
als needed for tlefense programs. The 
operation of DMS minimizes the 




Anthony A. Bertsch is Aaat. Admin- 
istrator, Industrial Mobilization, of the 
Business and Defense Services Admin- 
istration, U. S. Department of Com- 
merce. He has held positions related 
to industrial mobilization in the Com- 
merce Department since 1954 and prior 
to that served with the National Pro- 
duction Authority. 



effects of these various industrial and 
economic factors on defense programs. 
A strong and ready industry is as 
much a part of our national defense 
as a competent military organization. 
Industry's contribution to our national 
security, both under present conditions 
of the cold war or a possible enlarged 
war situation, cannot be determined by 
the military alone or by any partic- 
ular civilian branch of our Govern- 
ment. The atomic age, and now the 
space age, have developed a partner- 
ship between Government and indus- 
try under which cooperative efforts 
will assure the strength of our nation 
to meet any threat to our nation's se- 
curity. 

Authority. 

Under Title I of the Defense Pro- 
duction Act of 1950, as amended, the 
President is authorized to establish 
priorities in the performance of con- 
tracts or orders necessary to promote 
the national defense and to require 
the acceptance and performance of 
such contracts or orders for the 
purpose of assuring such priorities. 
He is also authorized, under the 
same title, to allocate materials and 
facilities for the purpose of promot- 
ing: the national defense. The term 
"national defense" is defined in the 
Defense Production Act as ", . . pro- 
grams for military and atomic en- 
ergy production or construction, 
military assistance to any foreign 
nation, stockpiling, and directly 
related activity." 

These priority and allocation 
powers aro administered by the Busi- 
ness and Defense Services Adminis- 
tration of the Department of Com- 
merce under delegation from the 
Secretary of Commerce, to whom they 
have been delegated by the President 
through the Director of the Office of 
Emergency Planning (OEP). This 
delegation relntea to the broad field 
of industrial production and mate- 
rials, as well as construction and 
research and development. Certain 
other Government agencies such as 
the Department of Agriculture, De- 
partment of Interior and Interstate 
Commerce Commission have been 
delegated priority and allocation 
powers with respect to certain prod- 
ucts, materials and services coming 
under^ their jurisdiction. The admin- 
istration of these powers with respect 
to industrial production and most 
materials ia accomplished through a 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



series of regulations and orders 
designated as the Defense Materials 
System. 

In delegating these authorities to 
the Secretary of Commerce, OEP has 
retained general policy guidance and 
coordination of the exercise of these 
powers by the Department of Com- 
merce and the other delegate agen- 
cies. OEP has also retained the gen- 
eral program function. 

An important feature of DMS is 
the fact that the use of priorities 
for defense programs is mandatory 
and not optional. This assures full 
support to defense programs and 
provides the Government with a 
source of essential statistical infor- 
mation regarding the impact of the 
defense programs on the economy as 
a whole. 

Historical background. 

The experience of World War II 
and the Korean Conflict has shown 
that converting industry from peace- 
time to wartime objectives has beeen 
and can be a time-consuming task. 
Prom the entrance of the United 
States into World War II after the 
attack on Pearl Harbor it took well 
over a year to develop a fully effec- 
tive system of industrial controls to 
support the war effort. After a period 
of trial and error in the use of priori- 
ties and allocations, the War Pro- 
duction Board developed a system, 
the Controlled Materials Plan (CMP), 
which became effective early in 1943. 
Once under way CMP was instru- 
mental in providing the sinews re- 
quired to conduct the most extensive 
military operation in our history. 

The principles of CMP were es- 
sentially simple. Its purpose was to 
balance the supply of industrial 
resources with the requirements of 
the nation to prosecute the war to 
a successful conclusion. It was deter- 
mined after careful analysis that 
three basic materials, steel, copper 
and aluminum, constituted a common 
denominator on the basis of which 
most of the industrial requirements 
for both military needs and the needs 
of the civilian economy could be 
measured. These three materials were 
designated the "controlled materials." 
The total supply of controlled mate- 
rials was determined quarterly and 
the military and civilian requirements, 
established by the responsible Govern- 
ment agencies, were collected and 
measured in terms of the controlled 
materials needed to accomplish them. 



A balance was established between 
the available supply and the total re- 
quirements by adjusting the require- 
ments on a time-phased basis and on 
the basis of essentiality. 

This process of assessment and 
balance was conducted by the Require- 
ments Committee of the War Produc- 
tion Board. The operations of this 
supply-requirements analysis proce- 
dure resulted in a series of balanced 
programs for military and civilian 
needs. The Requirements Committee 
issued allotments of controlled mate- 
rials to each of the Government 
agencies involved which were desig- 
nated "claimant agencies." The claim- 
ant agencies then allotted appropriate 
quantities of controlled materials to 
and authorized the use of priority 
ratings by contractors and suppliers, 
In this way individual producers of 
needed products, equipment and mate- 
rials were assured of a designated 
supply of the three controlled mate- 
rials and were authorized to use 
priorities to obtain the necessary 
supporting components and materials 
to complete their schedules. 

Despite the experience gained in 
World War II, when the United 
States entered the Korean Conflict in 
the summer of 1950, it again took a 
year for the National Production 
Authority (NPA) to install and make 
effective a modified version of CMP 
to direct the flow of products and 
materials into programs essential to 
the successful consummation of that 
effort. This was accomplished under 
authority provided in the Defense 
Production Act of 1960. 

When the Korean War ended by 
mid-1963 there was finally an aware- 
ness of the need for improving our 
preparedness position for industrial 
mobilization to meet any future 
emergency. The renewal of the De- 
fense Production Act in 1968 reflected 
the concern of both Congress and tho 
Executive Branch of the Government 
with achieving a continuing state of 
readiness for effective mobilization, 
resulting from the unsettled world 
situation. Of equal importance was 
the recognition by industry leaders 
that industry itself had a vital stake 
in the maintenance of a system in 
being to meet the continued heavy 
defense requirements and as a readi- 
ness measure which could be promptly 
expanded to meet the needs of an 
emergency situation. There was gen- 
eral agreement among responsible 
Government and industry representa- 



tives that only by the continued 
operation of a sot of Govcrnnicnti 
rules designed to accomplish this 
purpose could we achieve the in- 
dustrial goals necessai-y to our 
national security and be ready for the 
accelerated and changed industrial 
activity which might ho required In 
the event of another national emer- 
gency. On the basis of this consensus 
DMS was established shortly before 
the end of the Korean War. 

,DMS is a greatly simplified version 
of the Controlled Materials Finn 
which was in effect during the 
Korean War and is limited in Its 
operation to defense programs, It has 
been in continuous operation sinco 
July 1, 1953, but has been greatly 
simplified since its inception. 

The priorities system helps the de- 
fense contractor or subcontractor to 
obtain the materials and products 
needed to fill defense orders on time, 
DMS regulations, orders and proce- 
dures are designed to assure tho 
contractor preferential treatment to 
moot his defense commitments, Hear 
in mind that our present stopped up 
military requirements for defense, at 
home and abroad, come at a time 
when our economy is operating close 
to its overall capacity. Under Uioso 
conditions, the priority system should 
enable us to meet our military require- 
ments without the imposition of 
civilian controls. Also bear in minil 
that our Government must bo in a 
position to see that the material!* nnd 
equipment needed to support our 
defense effort are supplied on tlino 
and in tho right amounts, : 

Tho purpose of this article ia to \ 
give readers of the Defense Industry 
Bulletin a better understanding of; 

Tho purpose of DMS. < 

Its method of operation and its 
procedures. 

Industry responsibilities, obliga- 
tions and benefits under DMS whether 
a defense prime contractor, a. sub- 
contractor, or a supplier. 

What is DMS and what are 
its purposes? 

As previously stated, DMS is n 
series of Government regulations, 
orders and procedures issued under 
the authority of the Defense Produc- 
tion Act, It is designed to accomplish 
two main purposes; 

It is a means of directing the 
flow of materials and products to the 
production, construction and research 



November 1M5 



and development requirements of the 
nation's defense programs. DMS 
helps to insure that these defense 
programs are maintained on sched- 
ule by providing a priority for the 
purchase of materials by defense con- 
tractors, subcontractors and their 
suppliers. 

The operation of DMS permits 
the maintenance of an administrative 
means of promptly mobilizing the in- 



dustrial resources of the country in 
a limited or general war. 

DMS is not a standby system of 
priorities. It is in operation right 
now and has been operative since 
18BS and, because of it, this nation i s 
better equipped to meet its military 
commitments in South Vietnam than 
it was in previous conflicts. 
How extensive is DMS? 

S is limited in its application 



xnms Coveted by <! 
Mat mali Syjleiu 



r.-.\ 

K-1 

AM 
AM.900I) 

Ft; 



Aircr.ift 

Missiles !!!!!!.'!!!!!"!""!! 

Tank Automotive .."!!!!!!!!!!"".'!"!!!!""!! 

Ammunition '!!"!!"!!!!!""!!!!!!"!!"!!! 

.eiioitit and C.oniiiiunit.T lions I'liiiiiinu-ni ,','," 

.Military limldiiu; Supplies '...., ,..!!!,."!!,!!.",.'; 

Vnl"i' t "" 1 , ''''"JL 1 "' 1 -'"' (f'"verniiitnt-owncd) ...,..'. 
\i",.. I)tl <- 1|lst ' ('"iistnictiiin ',","" 



M^fh^^^ Nan} ^^^^^ 



""" 



Fur oibtr n f jenn; Alomh Kncr K y and related ftrof, 
i^vjL",) | tl '' t< * f '*' (1 fi ''onsumers (see sec. 9(il 
-ct'iaiii riuiiiitidiis iteiiir''j>iii'ctiiised'"b7 11 fHcml'iv 1 "i 1 i 



-jnliollcd Materials 'i'roducers"! 

rpffivcd state and local civil defense "i 

".rlher (.on v trim (Steel) 

rivnte domesdV produiluin 

rivate domestic anntriiction 

i'.nat inn prodiiciinn ami construction 



r 
Irstrilmtors of conirolled inatcriais"."!! 

^nCTi.WsBS n" C " linR s PP'i""(MMJ' 

madian Atomic finerny Prwam''^""'."'. 

'' 



I) eft' use 
agency 



Bent, nf Defense: 
Army. 

Navy (including 
(.oast Guard). 
Air Force. 



Associated Agencies 
of Dept. of DC- 
I en st : 

CIA.* 

TAA.* 

NASA." 



RDSA, * 



e Abbreviations as fallows: 

nnVTn m - ic n " cl *y f^mmiuinn. 

C A-reV^Mn,; 1 ! 1 !'' Defc ", se Scrvic " Administration. 

PA A V , , - I A/Wicy. 

MAcT Fc '} eri ?l Avmuin Aitency. 

WAWl-NfliioiwI Aeronautics and Space Adminislralmn. 

D'fonl^^t'aSSrio Se' 0(11^(^1 'n T "'V'TO identification symbo. 
sponsorship ty the Office of A Mr,. dv I Defense of |Jje Department of Defense, 
specific approval S DDSA. Assistnrlt Secretary of Defense (liutelUtions and Logistics) and 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Figure 1. 



to the programs of the Defense De- 
partment, the Atomic Energy Com- 
mission, the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration, and cer- 
tain "associated agencies" of DOD 
responsible for specific defense-re- 
lated progrrams. There are only 34 de- 
fense and defense-related programs 
to which the DMS rules apply. A 
list of these programs Is shown in 
Figure 1. DMS rules do not apply 
to civilian production nor do they 
apply to procurement of Government 
agencies other than those with as- 
signed defense responsibilities. 
How does DMS work? 

It works by the use of priorities 
and the allocation of certain con- 
trolled materials for defense and re- 
lated programs. First, let us examine 
priorities and later we will consider 
the controlled materials. 
How docs ono get a priority? 

There are only two ways in which 
a priority can be obtained. One ia 
from a Government agency, the other 
ia from the customer. It should be 
emphasized that it is mandatory that 
all contracts or purchase orders for 
defense programs be identified by a 
priority. This applies equally to the 
Government agency that places the 
order or awards the contract, the de- 
fense contractor who places an order 
with a supplier or subcontractor, and 
the supplier or subcontractor as well. 
For example, when the Air Force 
places a contract for aircraft it will 
use the priority DO-A-1. Similarly 
an Atomic Energy Commission con- 
struction contract would have the 
priority DO-E-1. And a subcontractor 
for the aircraft manufacturer would 
get an order with the same DO-A-1 
priority, 

There are two kinds of priorities: 
One is a rated order, which will be 
discussed at this point, and the other 
ia an authorized controlled material 
(ACM) order, which will be described 
later. ACM orders are used to get 
controlled materials steel, copper, 
aluminum and nickel alloys. Rated 
orders are used to get other materials 
and products. A rated order must 
contain these four elements; 

The priority rating which con- 
sists of the prefix DO or DX, followed 
by the appropriate program identifica- 
tion, such as A-l, E~l, etc, 

Either of the following certifi- 
cations: "Certified for national de- 
fense use under DMS Regulation 1" 
or "Certified under BDSA Regulation 



\Vlwt IH (ho preferential titnttw of n 
rated ordor? 

Thoro wen two typmi of priority ml- 
IngH: DO ratliiffN and DX nilhiKit. Thn 
lettoro DO and DX. ant Hut rating 
Hymbolw, A romplntu prlin-Ity rating 
coiittlHtu of onn of ihiiHti ruling HymlxtlH 
pltui iho appropriate program Identi- 
fication, for nxiimpln, UO-A-l or 1)X 
A-2. This program ItlnnllflfKUoii tluoa 
not nfToct thn profflnmttol HlnlUN of 
tho rating. AH DO rflllnjca Imvo equnl 
prcforontlul valuo. A DO-A--1 linn Uio 
BJIITW alnlua nn n DO-C-ti. .UO-ratad 
orders tako pracadoncA over unwind 
ordorn. All DX rating* Imvo wnml 
preferential value but DX-tntcd or- 

,!.- i-,,l. 



2." Eithnr of tliam* corLilUtnlion!! in onlo 
nccoptahln on a ratitd ordnr. plia;! 

Thfi HiKniiliU't! of ii n niilhor/intd nupi' 
ofllcial of Ihu Drni placing Uir rated very 
order, anarily 

* Tins dnlivory date or dalon rr~ 
ciuirnd. orily. 

TIu) purchuiiiu- or (Jovernnit'iit Whal 
tigdie.y nuiiit nLito fiu'iuiili the mipplu-r ruled 
willi a Htatenictil reading nulnitnntially 
ii9 .follown: 

"You am required to follow thn 

proviwon.'i of DMW 

find of all other nppHrulile 

and ordei'H of IID.SA in <di- 
controllnl male.rlali! and 

othnr jH'oduetn and umlei-Ialn 

ncMMlo.d ID 1111 thUi ordor." 

Thin jitnloimtnt niunt ujipnu' on Ihi- 
ordor or on u miparali 1 piece! of pnjier 
attached to Iho order. 

FlKiini a ithowH a nnmptd DO-rated 
order. When u rating: in mint on tin* 
purduum order, It niimt conlaln Uio 
four elmwml!! jiutt mentioned and 
which am circliul in Llui illuiilniLion. 

Tim certllkntlon on puri'liunn ordi-nt 
Iw fiijrnod liy tho ponion placing 
tlio order or liy a rmiponaihlu intli. 
vldual who In duly authorised lo nij;ii 
for Unit purpo.ni). 

UM.S Ifi n I'omplnlf] ayHleni liecidlnn 
thiv ratlntv aullmrlty Unit 
with thn IJovornnii'iil dnfe 
IH iianiiCMl down and uncd 
thn entlro chain of nupply lo Illl 
orlffiniil vuliid floiiLnict or purr 
order. Tlio mandatory imn of r 

Id llio priority iitiitiiH nf llm pro- 
vyrlo and it aluo applli'ii In 
rnplaciniKintit in Inventory of pniilurlu 
and iniU<>rlalfl intod lo Mil nitd oi-iloni, 
Tlio only lixcopLlim lo Out inandalory 
HO of rulhiKH IH un optional rxniptlitti 
for Individual imrclmrn> ordorn of 
01 



and unralcil ordem. It in em- If (lie rated order in f ()1 . . , 

d that n DN 1'iilinjv i:i n'fdly a iirl. i.r a i;ervin- whii-li ||ic sui'i l" " 

I ,.*.'. t *, n .\. i . .\. '. . . ,..,..] i . .. !.,, *^ j ,. .. ii i I I **^L 

I'MVi M.| tii.unlly niiiltc or purforni 
"'' '"' '""'"'-i;'' whirh Ih, m ^ 



ih'il I'xtrnt. It i:i n:.i-d pri 




I'm- 



cH apply to (lie 



, ' "' lilllnr. (he ntled nrdi>r wniill 

'iilinire of . , . , , ' ' would 

jiiiiji or inti'rrnpl llir iiiiiijilim.^ on 



Mvci-y rnti'd ordiT uiti!>t t"" iin-.-fiti'd 
atld (Illcil l'('Hii!'<iii'!)ii (if I'M.'- 1 ill); run 

lrai'|;t and onlt'ni, I'xri'pl ninlcr Hut 

['ul]u\vil!|r rilVlllii;il!HH'r:i; 

If l!n- |iro:i]ii'i'livi' pui''lnr.i'r In 
UlUviilinK <)]' Ulllllilc In Itiri'l llio vi'lk 
dor'n n'liuhiHy ruljilillnlird prln-tb tu- 



til-lay in ii|HTal(tin]i, 
If (h.- nil.-H ..niei- in |,| am | ,, y 
.-n.uii wh.i pri.dtin-,1 (hi- iianu> |irod. 



Ilial 



I'OIK ItAM dHUt fi 




Novombar 



* If the rated order would interfere 
delivery of any rated order which 
has already been accepted. However, 
a DX-ratecl order must be accepted' 
without regard to the effect of such 
acceptance upon the filling of unrated 
or DO-rated orders. 

In general, rated orders must be 
filled by the required delivery date. 
If a contractor does not expect to be 
able to fill a rated order by the time 
requested, he must not accept it for de- 
livery at that time. He must either 
reject the order, stating when he could 
fill it, or accept it for delivery on the 
earliest date he expects to be able to 
deliver, informing the customer of 
that date. 



curcment of other products and mate- 
rials. In addition, there are seven M- 
orders relating to production, delivery 
and distribution of certain materials 
and products. 



How is a rating used ? 

If a contractor receives a rated con- 
tract or order, he must use the rating 
to purchase the products and mate- 
rials he needs to fill the order or to 
replace inventory used to fill the order. 
If n contractor accepts a rated 
order and finds it necessary to delay 
delivery on an unrated order, ho is 
protected from any legal action his 
customer may take because of such 
delay. This is a very important pro- 
tection provided by the Defense Pro- 
duction Act and BDSA Regulation 2. 
Up to this point, the general pur- 
pose of DMS has been discussed, the 
defense programs to which it applies, 
the technical nature of a priority and 
how it is obtained and used; but DMS 
as a complete system has not really 
been covered. 

Earlier it was indicated that the 
basic principles, rules and procedures 
arc embodied in a scries of regula- 
tions and orders. (A listing of these 
regulations, orders and related actions 
may he found on page 38 of this issue. 
These documents can be obtained from 
ny Department of Commerce Field 
Office. A listing of the field offlces may 
be found on page 40.) The two pri- 
mary regulations in the system are 
DMS Regulation 1 and BDSA Regula- 
tion 2. BDSA Regulation 2 sets forth 
the basic rules of the priorities sys- 
tem and DMS Regulation 1 sots forth 
-fte basic rules of the Defense Mate- 
"ials System, 

DMS Regulation 1 applies to pro- 
luction, construction and research 
md development for defense pro- 
Mms involving the use of controlled 
laterials steel, copper, aluminum 
no nickel alloys, whereas BDSA 
^gulatlon 2 contains the rules and 
rocedures which apply to the pro- 

efense Industry Bulletin 



What are the controlled materials? 

There are four controlled materials 
steel, copper, aluminum and nickel 
alloys which are divided into eight 
categories as follows: 

Carbon Stool {including wrought 
iron) . 

Alloy steel (except stainless 
steel). 

Stainless steel. 

Copper and copper-base alloy 
brass mill products. 

" Copper wire mill products. 

Copper and copper-base alloy 
foundry products. 

Aluminum. 
Nickel alloys. 

Each of these eight categories is 
further broken down into the various 
forms and shapes of the four basic 
materials, e.g., sheet, strip, rods, 
liars, wire, etc. These are listed in 
Schedule 1 of DMS Regulation 1. 

The eight categories are used for 
the purpose of making allotments 
which will he covered later. 

Defense agencies contract for or 
buy directly a wide variety of items. 
These cover virtually every aspect of 
our industrial economy including con- 
struction, research and development, 
military hard goods, common use 
items, and a wide variety of soft 
goods, including: chemicals and medici- 
nols. Wo have tried to organise this 
great variety of items into a limited 
number of categories which would he 
manageable under our priorities sys- 
tem. 

With this in mind, we have estab- 
lished a category of items containing 
controlled materials made to military 
specifications which we call Class A 
products. As a matter of convenience, 
both construction and research and de- 
velopment are classified as Class A 
products. These include not only such 
obvious military items as ships, tanks, 
and guns, but also the specialized 
components going into these major 
products. 

A second category we have estab- 
lished is called Class B products 
which are, in general, common-use 
items containing controlled materials 
and which are normally made by 
manufacturers for off-the-shelf sale. 
Such items as fractional horsepower 
motors, machine tools, nuts and bolts, 



and a vast variety of other items are 
included in this general category. 

The third broad category carries 
no classification at all since it includes 
all the other items which generally <lo 
not contain controlled materials such 
as uniforms, fabrics, bedding, medi- 
cines, chemicals and ' many other 
things. 

When a defense agency places a 
contract for a Class A product, the 
contract or purchase order carries a 
priority rating-. If the contract is for 
defense production or research and de- 
velopment, the prime contractor Js 
required to submit an application, on 
Form DMS-4A, to the agency from 
which he received the contract speci- 
fying the quantities of controlled ma- 
terials he needs to fill the contract. 
If it is a construction contract, the 
contractor has to submit an applica- 
tion on Form DMS-4C. The defense 
agency involved, which we call an al- 
lotting agency, then issues an allot- 
ment of the requested amounts of 
controlled materials to the contractor 
with an authorization to use the ap- 
propriate rating and program identi- 
fication. The priority rating consists 
of the rating symbol, DO or DX, and 
a program identification, for example 
A-l, which means aircraft. The con- 
tractor is now required to use the 
symbol A-l to place priority orders 
for controlled materials, and the 
priority rating DO-A-1 to get other 
materials and products needed to fill 
the contract. 

If the prime contractor needs to 
buy Class A products which are spe- 
cially designed components, he merely 
places a rated order with his supplier 
but does not givo his supplier an al- 
lotment of controlled materials. The 
only ones who ever receive an allot- 
ment of controlled materials are prime 
contractors for the production of 
Class A products. If a contractor re- 
ceives a prime contract for the pro- 
duction of Class B products, he does 
not got an allotment of controlled ma- 
terials from the defense agency. He 
merely gets a rating with his con- 
tract. 

Anyone, whether he is a prime con- 
tractor or a subcontractor, who has 
received a rated order without an al- 
lotment Is nevertheless authorized to 
use a priority to obtain controlled 
materials. We call this priority an 
Authorized Controlled Mat&rial order 
or, more commonly, an ACM order. 

This can be stated in a slig-htly dif- 



ferent but summarized form. A con- 
tractor who receives a prime contract 
from a defense agency for Class A 
products gets an allotment and an au- 
thorization to use a priority. In DM.S 
Regulation 1, these contractors are 
called prime consumers. Contractors, 
who receive prime contracts for Class 
B products, and sub-contractors, who 
receive rated orders for Class A prod- 
ucts or Class B products, do not re- 
ceive an allotment from anyone but 
they do receive a rating. These con- 
tractors or suppliers are called self- 
authorizing consumers in contrast to 
those who are called prime consumers. 
The reason we use the term self-au- 
thorizing; consumer is because they do 
not have to submit an application to 
get an allotment and authorization 
but instead use the provision in the 
regulation which authorizes them to 
place ACM orders to get controlled 
materials. 

In making application for an allot- 
ment, the prime consumer must in- 
clude the total quantity of controlled 
materials required to fill the contract. 
This includes the quantities of con- 
ti-olled materials for his own use as 
well as those required by his suppliers 
from whom he purchases Class A 
products that are to be incorporated 
in his product. 

If a prime contractor needs infor- 
mation regarding the controlled- 
material requirements of any of hia 
suppliers of Class A products, he may 
request them to submit this informa- 
tion on Form DMS-6. A facsimile of 
the form is contained in Schedule V of 
DMS Regulation 1. This form is not 
supplied by the Government; however, 
the prime contractor may duplicate 
this form. The use of the form is not 
limited to prime contractors but may, 
in turn, be used by his suppliers o'f 
Class A products to obtain the neces- 
sary information from their suppliers 
of Class A products. 

What is an ACM order? 

An ACM (Authorized Controlled 
Material) order means any purchase 
order for any controlled material (as 
distinct from a product containing 
controlled material) which is placed 
pursuant to an allotment of controlled 
material or pursuant to self-author- 
ization. 

How is an ACM order placed? 

Figure 3 shows a sample ACM or- 
der, All ACM orders must contain 
the four elements that are circled in 
the illustration in addition to the basic 



data on the purchase order. These ele- 
ments are: 

The required delivery date. 

Statement on applicability of 
BDSA regulations and orders 

The allotment number and certi- 
fication. 

Authorized signature of a respon- 
sible official. 

A word about the allotment number. 
You will observe that it consists of 
the program symbol, e.g., A-l, plus 
the calendar quarter for which the 
allotment is valid. In the case of an 
ACM order of a self -authorizing con- 
sumer, the calendar quarter identifi- 
cation is the delivery date requested. 
This should not pose any problem be- 



cause the basic form of the allotment 
number is the same for a prime con- 
sumer or a self-authorizing consumer. 
If the contract or purchase order is a 
DX-ratcd order, the DX designation 
must bo added as a sufiix to the allot- 
ment, number, e.g., A-4, 3Q6G-DX and 
the order thus becomes an ACM-DX 
order. An ACM-DX order is entitled 
to priority in acceptance or delivery 
over other ACM orders. 
What are the general rules regarding 
placement of ACM orders? 

All defense contractors, either 
prime consumers or self -authorising 
consumers, must place ACM orders to 
obtain the controlled materials needed 
to fill a rated contract or order, 





Sample ACM Order 
STRUCTURES, INC. 




Kfihrunry 1, 1'X/i 


1000 Longvlow Avonuo 
Tennyson, Illinois 62370 

DATE 


PURCHASE ORDER HO, W12 


TO: Ajax Metals, Inc. 
/,00 Water Street,, 
Cranston, Hew Jersey 08210 

SHIP TO: Structures, Inc. 
As above. 


SHIP VIA Motor Fvolfjlil, 








CONTRACT NO. l)/i-W-03l-KH(}-<)G33 

SPECIFICATION To Kndornl iipfieif lent, 1cm 
OT1-V/,H, Typo \, Cl'iiMi K 


(''REQUIRED DELIVERY DATE7"\ 
V April 1, 19&6/ 


Ito/n 


Numb or Plncoi 


Shape 


Slio 


Longll! 


Total Wol(jhl 


Nolntloni 


i 


3 


Denm 


2/," - 130 II 


2'!' - 10^" 


10,035(1 




2 














3 














/, 














5 














6 














1 














$ 














9 














10 










_ 




11 












12 














13 














H 














15 














( 


Above contract carries rating 
DO-A-3. 


/motment Nimbor A-2-3Q66. Certified for n-TX. 
ttonnl dofcnao nan und"! 1 IMS Hn|iulntlon 1. \ 

\ (SiRiicd) 
1 John Smith J 
/ Hannf-or of 1'urchnolng ^/ 


^ You ore required to follow the pro^S 
visions of DMS Reg. 1 and of nil 
other applicable re^ulationa nnd 
orders of BDSA in obtaining con- 
trolled irflterials and other prod- 
ucts and materials needed to fill 
vthla order. -/ 


^^__ 


Aurhorliwi tl|jnoliir ^^* f 







Figure 3. 



November 1966 



ACM orders must not call for de- 
livery of any controlled materials in 
an amount greater than required to 
fill rated orders. The exception is 
where such quantities would be less 
than the minimum mill quantities 
listed in Schedule IV of DMS Regula- 
tion 1, and are not procurable from a 
distributor. In such cases, an ACM 
order may be placed for the full 
minimum shown on that schedule and 
the delivery of that quantity may be 
accepted by the supplier. 

The mandatory use of ACM or- 
ders need not be followed if the indi- 
vidual purchase order is in an amount 

J of $500 or less. 

The mandatory use of ACM or- 
ders applies not only to the procure- 
ment of controlled materials to fill de- 
fense-rated orders, but also to the re- 
placement in inventory of such ma- 
terials used to fill such orders, 

What nre the general rules regarding 
acceptance of ACM orders? 

Producers of controlled materials 
nro required to accept all ACM orders 
except under the following circum- 
stances: 

If the order is received after com- 
ij mcncement of lead time as Hated in 
r Schedule III of DMS Regulation 1. 

If the order is for less than tho 
minimum mill quantity shown in 
Schedule IV of DMS Regulation 1. 

If the prospective purchaser ia 
unwilling: or unable to meet tho sup- 
plier's regularly established prices 
nnd terms of sale and payment. 

If tho order need not be accepted 
under any of the individual controlled 
material M-orders. 

In the case of ACM-DX orders, 
the producer must accept them with- 
out regard to lead time or set-asides 

j) unless it is impracticable to make do- 
livery within tho required delivery 
month, in which case ho must accept 
tha ACM-DX order for the earliest 
practicable delivery date and so notify 
his customer. 

Controlled materials distributors 
must accept all ACM orders except 
under tho following conditions; 

If the order is not for immediate 
delivery, 

; If ho does not have the material 
in stock, unless it is ordered and he 
. knows that it ia in transit to him, 

If the prospective customer is 
P unwilling 1 to meet the distribu- 
j tor's regularly established prices and 

terms of sale or payment. 

If the order need not be accepted 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



under any of the individual controlled 
material M-orders. 

Up to this point, some of the essen- 
tial elements of the Defense Materials 
bystem and priorities as embodied in 
DMS Regulation 1 and BDSA Regu- 
lation 2 have been discussed. In addi- 
tion to these regulations, certain rules 
are applicable to particular controlled 
materials and particular products. 
These rules arc contained in BDSA 
M-orders (see listing on page 38). 

The fact cannot be emphasized too 
strongly that contractors must be- 
come familiar with the regulations 
and orders; this article is not meant 
to substitute for the actual regula- 
tions and orders. 

Some of these M-orders contain 
set-aside provisions whereby producers 
of controlled materials and certain 
products are required to reserve a por- 
tion of their production to fill rated 
orders. This is done to assure that an 
adequate supply of these materials 
will be available to fill priority orders. 
There are several other items that 
should be mentioned. If a contractor 
accepts a rated order he must use the 
rating to obtain containers and pack- 
aging material needed to make de- 
livery, and it must be used to obtain 
chemicals needed in the production of 
the item. 

A rated order or an ACM order may 
not be used to obtain capital equip- 
ment or for the purpose of plant ex- 
pansion or improvements. If inability 
to obtain capital equipment would re- 
sult in the failure to fill a rated order 
that has been accepted, an application 
for a rating for such capital equip- 
ment should bo made to the respon- 
sible allotting agency. 

Maintenance, repair and operating 
supplies (MRO) may be obtained in 
accordance with the provisions of 
DMS Regulation 1, Direction 1. This 
directive provides for the use of a DO- 
D-9 rating for MRO and for the al- 
lotment number D-9 on ACM orders 
for controlled materials needed for 
MRO, but only if inability to obtain 
MRO would prevent a contractor from 
filling a rated order. 

There is one problem which many 
contractors have already encountered, 
i.-3., what does a contractor do if he 
is having difficulty in getting what 
he needs after a rated order has 
been placed? We all know that there 
are situations in which there are de- 
livery delays or bottlenecks even 
though an order has been rated. For 



example, there can be conflicting 
rated orders on the supplier's sched- 
ule, there might lie inadequate facili- 
ties to produce the particular item, 
and others. BDSA has set up a pro- 
cedure to provide special assistance 
for defense contractors and suppliers 
when the regular DMS and priority 
procedures are ineffective. 

In such circumstances, the defense 
contractor may submit a request for 
special assistance on Form BDSAF- 
138 to the procuring or allotting 
agency involved. If the agency is un- 
able to overcome the difficulty, the re- 
quest is forwarded to BDSA for ac- 
tion. 

_ We will attempt to expedite the de- 
liveries or correct the bottleneck situ- 
ation by negotiating with the supplier, 
locating other sources, or by other 
means. We might use one of several 
methods such as: 

Arrangement of improved deliv- 
ery dates by informal agreement with 
the supplier. 

Issuance of a directive requiring 
the supplier to produce or deliver the 
specific item by a specified date. 

This is always done in cooperation 
with the supplier and the defense 
agency involved. 

A directive issued by BDSA takes 
precedence over all preferential or- 
ders, depending upon the terms of the 
directive. An example of directive ac- 
tion would be the rescheduling of the 
production and deliveries of a particu- 
lar supplier to meet the needs of the 
defense agency involved. 

Copies of Form BDSAF-188 may 
be obtained from the office adminis- 
tering the contract or from any De- 
partment of Commerce Field Office. 

It should be emphasized that BDSA 
will not and cannot undertake to pro- 
vide such assistance unless and until 
the contractor has exhausted every 
means at his disposal. 

If a contractor is engaged in de- 
fense work he must be familiar with 
DMS rules and procedures. This is a 
responsibility of all defense contrac- 
tors which is absolutely essential if 
they are to make their maximum con- 
tribution to our national security. We 
have designed the DMS and priorities 
system to aid both the contractor and 
the Government. 

(Editor's Note: See list of BDSA 
regulations beginning on page 38; list 
of U, S. Department of Commerce 
Field Offices on page 4Q.) 



Under the rules and regulations by 
tlifi Defense Materials System (DMS) 
the Business and Defense Serviceo Ad- 
ministration (HDSA) has delegated 
to the Secretary of DofeiiHe and this 
Chairman of the. Atomic. Knnrgy Com- 
mission three main prioritiea and al- 
locations authorities, nanmly, to rate 
then- iiontractn and orders with 1)X 
or DO; to nRHign tlio rlfflit to apply 
tho DX or DO rating for capital 
equipment; nnd to allocate Hteol, cop- 
per, aluminum and nickel alloyti For 
their Class A products. The Secre- 
tary of Defense Inui delegated these 
powers to tho Assistant Secretary of 
DiifeiiRC- (Installations and IiiiKlslic.'i). 
These powers, in turn, have linen dele- 
gated by tlio Assistant Kiwi-Mary of 
Defense (Instnllationfi and Iiojjlsliefi) 
to tho Army, Navy, Air Force, Do- 
fun RO Supply Atfency, Defomie Com- 
immlcntionH Agency and the Defemie 
Atomic Support Agency. 

Certain other agendas, for pro- 
grains approved liy the (Mike of 
Emergency PlanniiiKi operate under 
letter delegations from tho Awdnlnnt 
Secretary of Dcfonfto (IwilalluUmui 
and IiOKlstiH). Those approved pro- 
grams and their administering iitfen- 
cies are: 

K])nce progrnniH by thn National 
Aeronautics and .Space Administra- 
tion, 

Civil Air Currier Program; Air- 
lino Maintenance, Kopnlr and Operat- 
ing KupplioH Program; and the Air 
Navigational Aids ProKram by the 
Federal Aviation Agency. 

Selected Intelligence VrojrramH 
by thn Central IntolliKenco Agency, 

Stored Depot Program by thn 
General Services Administration. 

Written delpftimiH authorizing thn 
use of thetrn priorities powers are 
made to the contracting ofikm-H in 
tho Military Departments, Defense 
Supply Agency and tho other agencies 
mentioned nbovo, 

At thift point In time and sincn lOfii), 
it has been nnd IH mandatory that tlui 
procurement contracting; olllccrfl rain 
all their contracts and orders with a 
fnw minor HmitatloiiH imposed on 
DOT) by HDSA, Examples of lhnno 
limitations for which ratings ciinnot 
be usad nro: 

Civilian-typo Itoma procured for 
resale in pout or base exchanges. 

Food or petroleum producla ex- 
cept their packaging containers and 
chemicals used or needed to procoHS 
such products, 

Services por so, 




Hy 

H. M. MnlrlHltl. Jr. 



CmmtriN'Uon 

for luie in the Unih'd 

Army Civil Worku I'mnnnn. 

Contnii'lii anil ordcni under $!ii)i) dn 
not have to I" 1 rated under 1IDSA 
i-cgiilatiotm; hnwevi'i-, 1)1)1) practice In 
to raits lln'! i lunnll unli-ni JUK) etui- 
trac.tiii'ii an- urgnl to du likttwim 1 for 
t.liclr prntrcliim, 

lK)t) procurement contnicliiiK nt]| 
r{(ni have In limiw ll 
nntl onleni wliicli imidt 
and thiiiii! which iniiiil, lie r 
To clarify thin, ll will I" 1 
to diiicuim lint DOIl Mtiiid-r 
I.inl. 

1)01) nuiinlainii it chummed 
Mauler UrKi'iicy I.iiil, for ui;e \vilhln 
(iiivi'rnineilt only, which ninlliln.'i pni 
nntmn of hltflient mitinniil ui'Kt'iicy 
(Unit call-ivory); proffniniu tif hi)Thi':il 
1)01) ur|<c-iicy {iii'ctind citlcjvnry) ; and 
uthcr iinpiirUiiil 1)01) and Ciuuultun 
military jirufrnimu (Ihirtl culi'itm-y). 
Thin lint. In uiH'd fnr ihrce niiiiii pur 
pow!i within (hi! (lnvi'i-mni'iit uu fn| 
lowti ; 

* To inform the pniniremi'iit con- 




Stanley M, Mntclnkl Jr. IH flpoclnl 
AHH(, for PrloriLioN and Allocation In 
the Ofllco of Hie AHH(, Hocrt'lnry of 

Dufi'lIHO (iMilllllltlollH Si LOKlHtlCH), 

He hnn Horvcd lit noHitloiiH rclnli'il to 
the prlorllien nnd iulocnlloiiH Held with- 
in OA8D(IAL) since 1115.1, and IUIN had 
25 ycara oxncrleiico In Government 
procurcmout nnd production. 



I riii-l injv nDirerii itf t lunm 

mid nnli'i'H which iniuit lie ruled I)) 

An inli'i-iitil Kuiiliuici! for 
lion nf In biiiiiie ri'tumrci^i uii \\ 



TII nvmlvr nilllliclll for prod( 
linn rciiiiiirri':i in Ihe Special AH|S! 
mice- PruHi'iim which will bn dlnciiHac 
in iTitti'f tic-tail lider. 

I'mlt-r Hie writli'ii (li'lc-fvaOimti t 
(lie ]ifn'iiri'iin'iil flint raclinit olllci^ri 
they nni!i( rale cniilniclsi uud unlor 
In nM|i]inrt ff thf )iiKhc!>t imliomi 
culi'K l| i'>' prnc;rMifi llnli'il ill (hi) lll'fi 
cnlcfjiry uf Hit 1 Mimli-r Ui'Kc-ucy I,ln 
willi Iht- |)X rllii|[. TlH'im pi'DKram 
iiri' iippmvt'd hy Iht- I'i'i'Mideiit of th 
Unih-d Hlnlfji. lire very few in mini 
IHT, urn limited in ilullur volume, an 
urn di'onii'ii iif liUch inipiirtunni tlifi 
I'Vi-ry imtlinrlty wt Inive \\\ \\m\ t 
|iicvi-tit Ilii-ni fntni KeltillK i"t 
li'tuitilt- iir fri'iii Itc-ltiK deliiyed. Till 
tliii'M iu4 IIH-IMI thul nil i'ci|uiivntnit 
In lilt MM I'litlri' |H-M(fi'inn are (micro 
f.ii' .Iflivi-ry id IHKI-. IKID Iniitrurtinii 
ntl'i'Mii Ihc early pltici>Mit>ut nf onll)! 1 
Itiu! lln< I'lilnlilinblili'lll nf 1-eidlHlli 
phiint'il r<>iitrm-< tu-h'-iiulea liy the |in 
(jriiiiiiuiiiK I'llli'i'ii I ....... ible timely il( 

liveried ttt inci't the n.iiipreiiiied OJIOH 
liuiiitl dtih'ii inantlly lulu-rent hi UWF 
tup iii'Hi'iit projiriunti, 

At iiri'iii-jil th" DX priiHi'anifi nro 1 
in luiiiilter uiiil are Itnmvii an "Hrlcl 
Hut .til" imiKnmiH. I'm nro admlnli 
Icrcil by DOl), Iwo are iidmlnlntcK 
by the' Ntillimiil AcrtmauticH nn 
Hpnci' Ailnilnltilriitinii nnil oim by tl 
l-VtltTiil AvIatl.Mi AKeney, The tot 
aiiiuiiil ilnllur vulume ttf all lit pr 
iu It'ici Until lift iiin'cont of lot 
' pi-M.-urciiieiit, which IH llift lira 
on Uit'Hn prtiK''''!"" 1 l' ^V t] 
DX pri'Hnim vathiK ini'inilngful. Tl 
M'ciiiid I'Hlt'Kiiry, himwn "H "Hi'li'k-fl: 
Other Tlwn .HI," nuitnliKi !I9 lilghc 
IK)D urn.-iiey jirdKruinH, ami tl 
Ihini nitcK.iry, "due-Cap," conlal) 
HO 1)01) nnd Canadian mlllUiry pr 
Kruniti of li'MHi'V hnimrtanno. This H 
In rnvlHiMl mi tt conllnuInK I 1 ""'" i(l r 
llnct curronl comlllln. DOD Instru 
linns prohibit th UKO of tho Uric 



November 



Bat .01, Brick-Bat Other Than .01 and 
Cue-Cap urgency category designation 
on industrial paper since this is an in- 
ternal system for the three internal 
governmental uses described above. 

As stated earlier, the procurement 
contracting officers must rate con- 
tracts and orders in support of 
"Brick-Bat .01" programs with the 
DX rating. Almost all other DOD 
procurement is rated DO by the pro- 
curement contracting officers. Again, 
our instructions stress the early place- 
ment of these contracts and orders 
with realistic, phased contract sched- 
ules. 

J The DX and DO ratings are fully 

extendable throughout the industrial 
chain. It is mandatory that contrac- 
tors and suppliers extend these ratings 
for materials, components and subas- 
semblics to he physically incorporated 
in the contract items, with one excep- 
tion. The exception is that DX ami 
DO ratings are not extendable for the 
various forms and shapes of the con- 
trolled materials steel, copper, alu- 
minum and nickel alloys since au- 
thorized controlled materials orders 
{ACMO's) must he placed for these 
v materials under DMS regulations. 

Let us assume that all rated con- 
tracts and orders have been placed and 
accepted, and a contractor is in a posi- 
tion where he has all materials and 
components for timely manufacture 
and delivery of the contract item ex- 
cept the controlled materials. 

The question now is, how doon a con- 
tractor assure timely deliveries of the 
forms and shapes of the controlled 
materials needed for his contract? 

This is accomplished through the 
Defense Materials System which ia 
essentially a hank and chock system. 
$ Baaed on phased quarterly program 
controlled materials needs (submitted 
to DOD by the prime contractors on 
DMS-4A applications for production 
nnd research and development con- 
tracts, and on DMS-4C applications 
for construction contracts) and on 
any new program needs known to 
DOE, quarterly phased controlled ma- 
terials requirements are submitted to 
the Office of Emergency Planning 
and, in turn, to BDSA, Washington, 
D, G. BDSA, having DOD controlled 
materials requirements, Atomic En- 
^ orgy Commission (AEC) controlled 
f materials requirements, and the Glass 
B product controlled materials re- 
quirements, establishes a set-aside- 
which can be considered as a bank- 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



for each controlled material producer 
sufficient to cover all rated orders. 

Meanwhile, the Office of Emergency 
Planning makes a hulk allocation to 
DOD and AEC. The Office of the As- 
sistant Secretary of Defense (Instal- 
lations and Logistics) OASD(I&L) 
reallocates to the Military Depart- 
ments, Defense Supply Agency, Na- 
tional Aeronautics and Space Admin- 
istration and the Federal Aviation 
Agency sufficient controlled materials 
for their needs. These allocations, in 
turn, are passed to the allotting of- 
fices who make allotments to the 
prime contractors on DMS Forms 10, 
if production, or DMS Form 13, if 
construction, based on their DMS-4A 
and DMS-4C applications, respec- 
tively. 

Using these allotments, prime con- 
tractors place authorized controlled 
materials orders (ACMO's) on the 
controlled materials producers or dis- 
tributors. Subcontractors are in- 
formed by their prime contractors 
that they will self-authorize ACMO's 
for certain quantities of the con- 
trolled materials, which were included 
on the prime contractors' DMS-4A or 
40 applications. Other subcontractors 
must self -authorize ACMO's for 
only those quantities of controlled ma- 
terials needed to fill rated orders that 
they have received and accepted. The 
ACMO's can be considered as the 
chocks issued against the set-asides, 
or the bank, as mentioned earlier. If 
the producer's set-aside is filled or 
order leadtime has commenced, he 
may reject ACMO's, except those 
identified with a DX suffix. In such 
cases contractors must shop with 
other producers for placement of 
their orders, thus forcing an equitable 
distribution of rated business with all 
producers of the controlled material 
involved. 

Under the simplified Defense Mate- 
rials System today, allotment records 
are kept only by the prime contractors 
to minimize workload and costs in in- 
dustry. Subcontractors do not keep 
allotment records since the prime con- 
tractors write-off on their books the 
quantities that they inform the sub- 
contractors to self authorize. 

Monthly and quarterly usage re- 
ports of the controlled materials are 
submitted through the same Govern- 
ment channels by OASD (I & L) and 
the Atomic Energy Commission to the 
Office of Emergency Planning. Quar- 



terly shipment reports are submitted 
to the Business and Defense Services 
Administration by the controlled ma- 
terials producers and, in turn, to the 
Office of Emergency Planning. These 
data are used to assess the impact of 
rated business on the national econ- 
omy. 

The next question that arises is 
how does a contractor obtain ratings 
to acquire timely deliveries of capi- 
tal equipment, including production 
equipment and scientific and technical 
equipment to be privately owned, pri- 
marily needed to produce rated busi- 
ness. The procedure is to file a DOD 
Form 691 with the nearest Defense 
Contract Administration Services of- 
fice. Need for such equipment will be 
validated by a production representa- 
tive from that local office and the ap- 
plication will be forwarded by that 
office to the procurement contracting 
officers having jurisdiction over the 
contract or contracts. The procure- 
ment contracting officers have delega- 
tions, in most instances, to assign a 
contractor the right to apply a DX or 
DO rating on his purchase order to 
obtain such equipment, if it is abso- 
lutely necessary to perform DX or 
DO rated contracts and if similar 
equipment is not available in his 
plant. 

Now a contractor has reached the 
point where everything is under way 
with no problems for the timely de- 
liveries of the items ordered on his 
rated contracts. Supporting contracts, 
orders, and ACMO's, as well as those 
of his suppliers have been placed, ac- 
cepted and scheduled in accordance 
with the BDSA rules. These rules re- 
quire DX- and DO-rated contracts 
and orders to delay non-rated or com- 
mercial orders, if necessary. If con- 
flicts arise between DX- and DO- 
rated orders, DX orders override DO 
orders. If conflicts arise in the DX- 
rated group of orders or the DO-rated 
group of orders, date of receipt of 
such orders at the suppliers plant 
governs. If orders were received, in 
either the DX or DO groups on the 
same date, the order with the earliest 
delivery date is given preference, 

As stated, a contractor is now theo- 
retically ready to make timely deliv- 
eries under his contracts. However, a 
change in battle plans necessitates 
earlier deliveries under his contracts; 
or he discovers that his forging sup- 



plier had a breakdown on his 20,000- 
pound hammer and his forgings will 
be three months late; or he finds out 
that hia purchasing agent forgot to 
order some part necessary to com- 
plete the job which has a leacltime of 
several months; or the steelsheet con- 
trolled materials producer is on strike 
and he does not know when he can 
ship his order. 

For these situations and to leg-ally 
change the delivery dates established 
under the EDS A rules antl regula- 
tions, we have been operating a Spe- 
cial Assistance Program since 1950. 

"Under this program a contractor 
may file for special assistance to 
break temporary bottleneck situations 
to keep DX- or DO-rated business on 
schedule or to request aid for timely 
order placement. A standard BDSA 
application, known as BDSAF-138, is 
used by all defense agencies and their 
contractors. This application is usu- 
ally filed by the contractor, and again, 
with the nearest local Defense Con- 
tract Administration Services office. 
The 138 application will be validated 
by a production representative of that 
local office and forwarded to certain 
designated points in Washington, 
D. C., through the cognizant procure- 
ment contracting offices; or other des- 
ignated offices, such as the Joint Aero- 
nautical Materials Activity, Wright 
Patterson APB, Ohio, which has DMS 
antl priorities responsibility for the 
overall aircraft program, known as 
the A-l program. 

There are seven DOD offices in the 
Washington, D. C., area authorized to 
review these applications, sign and 
forward them to BDSA. They are: 

Deputy Chief of Staff, Logistics, 
U. S. Army. 

Army Materiel Command, U. S. 
Army. 

Office of Chief of Engineers, 
U. S. Army. 

Naval Material Command. 

Deputy Chief of Staff, Systems 



the supplier, the conflicts are referred 
to OASD(I&L) for resolution. Rep- 
resentatives from the Military De- 
partments or defense agencies in- 
volved in the conflict are called in and 
we try to resolve the conflict by vali- 
dating need dates, reducing needs to 
bare minimums, and determining the 
urgency of the programs involved at 
that point in time. If the conflict can- 
not be resolved to the mutual satis- 
faction of the representatives in- 
volved in the conflict, the DOD Mas- 
ter Urgency List is again used, as 
the last resort, with the conflict being 
resolved in favor of the program of 
the higher urgency. Then BDEA, us- 
ing its priorities powers, directs the 
supplier to deliver in accordance with 
the needed delivery date or with a se- 
quence of delivery dates, as the case 
may be, as recommended by OASD 
(I&L). 

During the past year, the case load 
has increased substantially for two 
main reasons : because of the in- 
creased military procurement for 
Southeast Asia and because of the 
compression of procurement schedules. 
As a result, production resource diffi- 
culties have, and are, being experi- 
enced in a number of areas such as 
forgings, extrusions, electronic com- 
ponents, copper and copper products, 
machine tools, textiles and clothing 
items and certain chemicals. 

Our experience has shown that as 
much as an average of two or three 
weeks can elapse from the submission 
of a BDSAF-138 application by a 
contractor until corrective action Is 
taken by BDSA. For urgent Vietnam 
cases, a short cut procedure was put 
into effect in August 196G, whereby 
BDSA will accept telephonic requests 
from our seven designated Washing- 
ton offices and action will be initiated 
immediately. However, such requests 
must bo supported with the submis- 
sions of BDSAF-138 applications as 
soon as possible after such requests 



ness and because of its large 
distribution. Over 10,000 copies are 
distributed. The Defense Contract 
Administration Services offices also 
have standard priorities and alloca- 
tions instructions, issued as pnrt of 
their Production Manual. These in- 
structions are based on, and consist- 
ent with, those contained in the DOD 
Priorities and Allocations Manual. 

This article has covered DOD pro- 
cedures related to priorities, the De- 
fense Materials System, the Special 
Assistance Program, and the use of 
the DOD Master Urgency List En re- 
lation to priorities and the Special 
Assistance Program. It is hoped that 
it will bo helpful to the readers of 
the Defense Industry Bulletin, espe- 
cially to those in industry, in under- 
standing the manner in which these 
closely interrelated systems function. 
There are important benefits to be 
gained by DOD, defense related agen- 
cies and industry through the proper 
use of priorities and allocations au- 
thorities. Using these authorities and 
procedures, industry should be alle to 
schedule DX- and DO-rated business 
to fulfill contract delivery schedules 
with the minimum disruption to nor- 
mal commercial business. Since the 
defense take of the Gross National 
Products is still less than 10 percent, 
it is felt that industry can schedule 
and make timely deliveries of DX- 
and DO-ratcd contracts and ordcrSj 
in most instances, without major dis- 
ruption to commercial business, 



New Anti-Tank Weapon 
To Be Tested 

Test firing of the Army's Medium 
Range Anti-tank/Assault Weapon 
System (MAW) will begin next spring 
on an overland range at Cape Ken- 
nedy, Pla. 

Weighing 27 pounda, MAW ia the 
Army's answer to the front lino Mi- 
dler's need for a guided missile aye- 
tern light enough to be carried by one 
man. to be shoulder flred and yet hav- 
ing a warhead big enough to destroy 
most armor and other infantry tar- 
gets. MAW will be superior in rang*, 
accuracy and lethality to the 90mm 
recoilless rifle which it replaces. 

Developent firings will be conducted 
by McDonnell Aircraft Corp, MAW 
prime contractor, under the d recHon 
of the Army Missile Command which 
manages the weapon system at Bed- 
stone Arsenal, Ala. 



November 19W 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 



MaJ. Gen. William A- Enemark, 
USA, has been designated as Senior 
Army Member, Military Studies and 
Liaison. Div., Weapons Systems Eval- 
uation Group, Office of the Dir., 
Defense Research & Engineering 1 . 

Dr. Cody W. Wilson has been ap- 
pointed Dir. of the Behavioral 
Sciences Office in the Advanced Re- 
search Projects Agency, succeeding 
Dr. Lee W. Huff. 

Dr. Patrick J. Friel has been ap- 
pointed Dir., Ballistic Missile De- 
fense, Advanced Research Projects 
Agency, succeeding Dr. S. J. Rabino- 
witz who has returned to Columbia 
, University. 

Dr. Carl Walske has been sworn in 
as Asst. to the Secretary of De- 
fense (Atomic Energy) and Chairman 
of the Military Liaison Committee to 
the Atomic Energy Commission. 

Richard C. Stcadman has been ap- 
pointed Dep. Asst. Secretary of De- 
fense for Far Eastern Affairs, Office 
of Aast. Secretary of Defense (Inter- 
national Security Affairs). 

C. A. Fowler was sworn into office 
Oat. 12 as Dep. Dir., Defense Re- 
Bearch & Engineering for Tactical 
Warfare Programs, succeeding Dr. 
Thomas P. Chcatham who has re- 
turned to private business. 

Brig. Gen, Hal D. McCown, USA. 
J lias been designated as Dir., Ground 
Munitions Office, Office of Asst. Sec- 
retary of Defense (Installations & 
Logistics). 

Capt. Kcnith V. Lindstrom, USN, 
has been designated as Dir., Air Mu- 
nitions Office, Office of Asst. Secre- 
tary of Defense (Installations & Lo- 
gistics). 

Capt Victor A. Dybdal, USN, has 
been ordered to new duty as Dop. Dir. 
for Planflj Defense Communications 
Agency. 

Tho following assignments have 
been made in the Office of the Asst. 
Secretary of Defense (Public Af- 
faira): Robert W. Harvey reassigned 
, from the Directorate for Defense In- 
' formation to be Special Asat. for 
Audio-Visual to the Asst. Secretary; 
John C. Kirby reassigned from Ex- 
ecutive Assistant to the Asst, Secre- 
tary to bo Chief, OSD Div., Directo- 
rate for Security Review; William E. 
(Mom reassigned from Dir. of Defense 
Information to be Special Asst. to 
the Asst, Secretary; Col. Winant 
Sidle, USA, nominated for promotion 
to brigadier general, reassigned from 
Special Asst. to the Asst. Secretary 
to be Dir. for Defense Information; 
and Lt. Col. Harry J. Maihafcr, USA, 
reassigned from Chief, Business 
Branch, Directorate for Community 
Relations, to be Executive Officer to 
the Asst. Secretary. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Dr. Russell D. O'Neal has been 
sworn in as Asst, Secretary of the 

Defense Industry Bulletin 




Army, (Research & Development). He 
was formerly the Vice President of 
Aerospace Systems, Bendix Corp. 

Col. Lawrence R. Klar and Col. Wil- 
liam C. Neubauer have assumed new 
duties with the U.S. Army Strategic 
Communications Command. Col. Klar 
IB serving as the command's Chief of 
Staff and Col. Neubauer has been ap- 
pointed Commanding Officer of conti- 
nental U. S. operations. 

Col. Sterling H. Abernathy has as- 
sumed newly assigned duties as 
Comptroller and Dir. of Programs 
for the Army Missile Command, Red- 
stone Arsenal, Huntsville, Ala. He 
succeeds Col. David Marcelle who 
has been transferred to the Office 
of the Comptroller, Department of 
the Army. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

The Navy's David W. Taylor Model 
Basin, Carderock, Md., is getting a 
new commanding officer and a new 
technical director. Capt. Manuel Vin- 
cent has been reassigned from duty 
with the U.S. Navy Mission to Brazil 
to duty as Commanding Officer of the 
Model Basin. Dr. Alan Powell has 
been appointed to the position of 
Technical Director. He has served as 
Head of the Acoustics and Vibration 
Laboratory since January 1966. 

Col. Howard E. Wcrtman, USMC, 
lias reported for duty as Chief of 
Staff, .Marine Corps Supply Activity, 
Philadelphia, Pa. He comes to the new 
assignment from duty as Commanding 
Officer, Third Force Service Regiment, 
at Okinawa. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

General Hunter Harris Jr., Com- 
mander in Chief, Pacific Air Forces 
will retire from the Air Force on Jan. 
31, 1967. 

MaJ. Gen. Neil D. Van Sickle has 
been named Den. Inspector General 
for the Air Force. 

Brig. Gen. Albert W. Schinz has 
been reassigned from duty in Vietnam 
to a new assignment as Commander 
Air Force Tactical Air Warfare Cen- 
ter, Eglin AFB, Fla. 

Beril Edelman, Industry Relations 
Manager of Western Electric Co., 
Inc., has been, named a consultant 
to the Dep. Under Secretary of 
the Air Force (Manpower). 



Dr. William B. Simecka, former 
Navy consultant, has been named 
Chief Scientist of the Air Force 
Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, 

Col. Robert Muldrow has been ap- 
pointed Vice Commander, Air Force 
Missile Development Center, Hollo- 
man AFB, N.M., replacing Col. Lee L. 
f eterson. Col. Peterson has been serv- 
ing- m the dual capacity of Vice Com- 
mander and Chief of Plans and 
Requirements since Col. William 
Cleveland's retirement last July. 

New assignments in the Air Force 
Systems Command (AFSC) are: 

Arthur G. Wimer Jr., Chief Scien- 
tist succeeding Dr. Bernhard H. Goet- 
hert; Brig. Gen. Henry B. Kucheman 
Jr., Vice Commander, Aeronautical 
Systems Div.; Col. Robert M. White, 
Chief, Tactical Systems Office, Dep. 
for F-lll, Aeronautical Systems Div.: 
Col Spencer S. Himn, Dep. for 
lactical Systems, Electronics Sys- 
tems Div.; Col. Francis J. Dillon Jr., 
Dep. for Surveillance and Control 
Systems, Electronics Systems Div.; 
Col. Charles G. Johnson, Chief, Tacti- 
cal Planning Division, Directorate of 
Planning and Technology, Electronics 
Systems Div.; Col. Conrad R. Peter- 
son, Dir., 458/490L Engineering 
Div., Electronics Systems Div.; Col. 
Ralph A. Newman, Chief, Resources 
Support Office, Systems Engineering 
Group; and Col. Raymond S. Sleeper, 
Commander, Foreign Technology Div. 

New assignments in the Air Force 
Logistics Command are: 

Col. Paul E. Greiner relieves Ma]. 
Gen. C. B. Root as Commander, Mobile 
Air Materiel Area, Brookley AFB, 
Ala.; Lt. Col. E. Vince Moyer, Chief, 
Office of Information, Warner-Robins 
Air Materiel Area, Robins AFB, Ga, 



Radiography 
Handbook Available 

DOD Handbook H-56 titled "Radio- 
graphy," is now in distribution 
throughout Government and industry. 
The publication is the second in a 
series of non-destructive testing 
handbooks which were developed by 
the Army Materials Research Agency 
and published by the Office of the 
Assistant Secretary of Defense (In- 
stallations & Logistics). 

The handbook provides technical 
guidance to quality and reliability as- 
surance personnel concerned with 
non-destructive testing techniques 
used in the detection of discontinu- 
ities and other material defects in 
metals and non-metallic products. 

The document is available for pur- 
chase from the Superintendent of 
Documents, U.S. Government Print- 
ing Office, Washington, D.C, 20402, 
for $1.25 a copy. 



11 



It would be fair to acknowledge that 
the world has not in general queued 
up to join what Secretary McNamara 
introduced, in Paris in May 1965, as 
the Common Defense Market. As a 
matter of fact, one defense minister 
is reportedly of the opinion that his 
substantial orders for U.S. defense 
equipment have nothing to do with 
any Common Defense Market. 

Perhaps our problem lies in those 
capital letters. No one has yet estab- 
lished, or promised to establish, a 
Common Defense Market but, like 
Moliere's character who was aston- 
ished to learn he had been speaking 
prose all his life, we may indeed be 
well into the establishment of a com- 
mon defense market, 

Certainly, a "common defense" has 
been affirmed by most of the free 
world by the terms of the treaties of 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organiza- 
tion, the Southeast Asia Treaty Orga- 
nization and the Central Treaty Orga- 
nization and by repeated subsequent 
confirmations. But has this identifica- 
tion with a common defense led to a 
common marketplace for defense 
equipment? The answer depends on 
what test you apply. It happens to be 
yes if one compares free world cross- 
border defense transactions with 
those of the European six-country 
common market (whose existence no 
one challenges) both relative to the 
levels of domestic transactions. In 
1964 the six-country exports within 
the common market amounted to $18.4 
billion or about eight percent of the 
gross domestic product at factor cost 
of $421 billion in those countries dur- 
ing the same year, These data reflect 
the success of the common market in 
that exports within the six countries 
during the period 1958 to 1964 in- 
creased 168 percent 

.Now, with respect to cross-border 
transactions within the free world in- 
volving defense hardware, the United 
States alone, during the four and one- 
half years after June 30, 1961, has 
received orders valued at about $6.8 
billion (and commitments for another 
$3.7 billion). During these same years, 
the defense budgets of the free world 
countries outside the United States 
made available about $45 billion for 
defense hardware, ,0n an order-and- 
commitment basis, therefore, they or- 
dered from the United States about 
25 percent of their defense hardware 
procurements, United States receipts 



by 

Leonard A. Alne 

Dep. for Weapon Systems Planning 

Office of Dep. Asst. Secretary (International Logistics Planning) 
Office of Asst. Secretary of Defense (International Security Affairs) 



on these orders were about $6 billion 
or about 13 percent of the defense 
hardware budgets of the six countries. 
Our allies have demonstrated, there- 
fore, a willingness to spend about one 
dollar in every eight for defense hard- 
ware procurements from the United 
States. During the same period, U.S. 
defense expenditures abroad total 
about $12.3 billion (not including ex- 
penditures associated with Vietnam) 
of which about $700 million was for 
defense equipment the predominant 
remainder being for troop deployment 
costs. 

It can be argued, therefore, the 
$6.7 billion in free world defense 
hardware cross-border transactions, 
during a four and one-half year 
period, constitutes sufficient evidence 
to permit the assertion that a common 
defense market does, in fact, exist. 

But whatever real progress has 
been made so far toward a common 
defense market, what are the pros- 
pects for further progress? Any such 
prediction rests on an amalgam of 
economic, technical and political reali- 
ties. 

The Economic Argument. 

Economically, the case for a com- 
mon defense market is unshakable. 
No one can dissent from the thesis 
that if Country A can build one ra- 
dar system or two ships with one 
unit of labor and capital, and Country 
B can build two radar systems or one 
ship with one unit of labor and capi- 
tal, then the two countries, each 
spending two units of labor and capi- 
tal, have the choice of: 
Country A building one radar 
and two ships, Country B build- 
ing two radars and one ship, for 
a total of three radars and three 
ships ; 

or, by cross-servicing one another 
through trade, 

Country A building four ships, 
Country B building four radars, 
for a total of four radars and 
four ships. 

The better economic choice is clearly 
the latter, 



It is less obvious, however, tlmt th< 
same result in lesser degrees obtain! 
when a country has no natural ad 
vantage over another country In nn> 
field of defense equipment, Suppose 
Country C with one unit of labor fln<3 
capital can produce either 15 raelfoa 
or one truck and that Country I) with 
a similar unit can produce 10 radios 
or half a truck. D is disadvanlnftod In 
both items but its disadvantttff* In 
radios is less. Now, if each country, 
insisting on self-sufficiency, 
one unit of labor mid capital to 
and two units to trucks, they can pro- 
duce: 

Country C, three units, building 
15 radios and two trucks; Coun- 
try D, three units, building 10 
radios and one truck, far ti total 
of 25 radios and three trucks. 
However, if each decides to produce 
that concerning; which it has the 
greatest comparative advantage or 
least comparative disadvantage, C 
will produce trucks and 1) will |n - o- 
duce radios: 

Country C, three units, building 
three trucks; Country I), three 
units, building 30 radios, for n 
total of throe trucks and 30 
radios. 

With such specialization, C mid I) 
have grained five radios. To makti IrmHo 
feasible, they could agree on prices 
such that one truck is equivalent to 
18 radios, in which case : 
Country C would receive 18 radios 
and two trucks; Country D would 
receive 12 radios and one truck, 
There would be gain for C of throe 
radios and for D of two radios rela- 
tive to their independent ability ns 
given in the first situation above. D, of 
course, continues disadvantuged in 
total product relative to G but both 
countries gain by virtue of thoir 
agreement to trade. 

The economic moral is clear. The 
defense technology advantage of the 
United States is groat not because* 
of intelligence, of course, but because 
of the breadth of its research and de- 
velopment effort and its relatively 
longer production runs against which 



November 1966 



lo *X-recurring costs can be amortized. 
^ut even with such a natural general 
Lt i Vantage in the United States, the 
>e *iefits of specialization and trade 
L cc:rue to both the United States and a 
country even when the smaller 
finds itself disadvantaged in 
fields of defense technology. And 
across-the-board disadvantage is 
least unusual if it does exist at all. 



Technical Argument. 
A single current high-performance 
aircraft costs today about 120 
as much as the best similar 
hardly equivalent) aircraft of 
World War II. Defense tech- 
has indeed become incredibly 
ostly and the ability of even the 
of the free world countries to 
for, let alone produce, the whole 
of sophisticated defense is 
severely tested. Given the enor- 
mous need to devote public resources 
a non-defense efforts, it has been un- 
voi d able for some time that de- 
mse ministers weigh very carefully 
'hether to develop and produce at 
omo those items of defense hardware 
liieh can be procured much more 
sonomtcally abroad. This technologi- 
st cost-effectiveness thrust has been 
eating a common defense market for 
ie last five years, whether the phrase 
a happy one or not, and will con- 
rme to do so until the need for de- 
vanishes. 



Ke Political Argument. 

It must be remembered that a corn- 
on defense market differs from a 
vil sector common market in that 
sf ense procurement comes under the 
?ht control of governments; is 
Dsely associated with national se- 
.rity; and is large in value and re- 
ive a, therefore, careful decision- 
nlcing analysis. The six countries in 
jrope recognized these differences 
excluding military procurement 
om the categories of transactions 
ming under trade liberalization 
thin the community, and it should 

generally recognized that a formal 
tmmon Defense Market is more am- 
;foii8 than any similar effort in the 
ril sector and has not, in fact, been 
ed. 

Tliese differences, characteristic of 
fense procurement, compel defense 
nisters to take into account: 
* The need, at whatever cost, for 
;a l>lishing and maintaining a de- 
ise production base at home for 
ected items. 

tfense Industry Bulletin 



The labor and individual capa- 
bility for and interest in domestic pro- 
duction. 

The availability of foreign ex- 
change. 

The incremental differences in 
security, cost and quality between 
buying at home and buying abroad. 

The political merit and impact 
of each of the options. 

The priority of actions required 
to maintain an effective defense 
force. 

One cannot write a scenario for this 
process of analysis even in the gen- 
eral case. But the process does go on 
continuously in each government and 
the results are visible. Defense min- 
isters, by their decisions in the face 
of economic, technical and political 
imperatives, are forming a common 
defense market. 

The United States Role. 

Candor suggests that the United 
States now stand up and be counted 
in regard to its intentions on any 
common defense market. Very simply, 
is it willing to buy defense equipment 
abroad in the light of the same im- 
peratives which it sees confronting its 
allies? 

The answer is yes, but the impera- 
tives need some illumination. Eco- 
nomically, the United States is, by 
some measure relevant to defense, 
about twice as large as its allies com- 
bined. With a $7 billion annual in- 
vestment in research and development 
and with defense production runs 
averaging an order of magnitude 
higher than that of any other ally, 
the scale of U.S. defense procurement 
brings in train a scope and machinery 
of management so broad that the com- 
petitive entry of a foreign government 
or firm into the process is not simple 
to arrange. Nevertheless, it can be 
done witness the Canadian success 
in winning D OD orders averaging 
over $200 million annually during the 
last few years, and British success in 
winning DOD orders in the amount of 
about $125 million so far under the 
F-lll arrangement (including a Rolls 
Royce engine for the USAF A-7 air- 
craft). 

The theory of "least comparative 
disadvantage" noted above is quite 
valid but the DOD military procure- 
ment officer, charged with a large com- 
plex program with tightly scheduled 
performance dates and burdened with 



uncompromising users on the one 
hand and obstreperous laws of physics 
on the other, is not likely to be much 
preoccupied with the subtle opportu- 
nities presented by economics. 

Technically, there is promise. We 
know that there are fields in which 
our allies excel aircraft engines from 
the UK, signal generators from Ger- 
many, anti-tank weapons from France, 
just to take some examples. We know 
that every country will continue to 
bend every effort toward achieving 
a recognized technical superiority 
(we would think in selected fields when 
the whole spectrum of defense tech- 
nology cannot be covered) and we 
know that good ideas distribute them- 
selves rather evenly among the human 
race. 

Politically, we have a Buy American 
Law and an exquisite balance of pay- 
ments problem. The law dates from 
1932 and the Secretary of Defense 
does not exercise the exceptions pro- 
vided by it in any casual way. The 
balance of payments problem is hope- 
fully more short term but, until the 
world-wide liquidity problem is solved, 
may remain with us as long as U.S. 
defense foreign exchange expenditures 
remain substantial. 

Nevertheless, politically, there is a 
highly significant fact that promises 
a U.S. willingness to participate in 
the steady growth of a common de- 
fense market. The United States be- 
lieves it is in its interest, as well as 
the interests of its- allies, to en- 
courage the adoption of rules of the 
road under which each country can 
have a chance to realize its techno- 
logical potential and aspirations and 
contribute thereby to the common 
achievement of the common defense. 
The United States will probably not 
be willing to move any faster than any 
other country in expanding off-shore 
defense hardware procurement. The 
United States will compete hard and 
will expect hard competition, but it 
does want to build and keep the arena 
in which that competition can take 
place, And it does want the other 
teams to be there. Allies, who may 
doubt thia, should challenge the 
United States, not in terms of gen- 
eralized debate but in terms of spe- 
cific arrangements and requirements 
figuring significantly in the decision- 
making process of each defense min- 
istry. 



13 




Defense Procurement Circular No. 
48, Sept. 27, 1966. (1) Suspension of 
Work. (2) Illinois Retailers' Occupa- 
tion Tax Instructions to be Issued to 
Contractors. 



Each Defense Procurement Cir- 
cular is designed to place new or 
changed policy or procedures in ef- 
fect prior to publication of an 
Armed Services Procurement Reg- 
ulation (ASPR) revision. ASPR 
subscribers will receive DPC's and 
ASPR revisions through the Super- 
intendent of Documents, U. S. 
Government Printing Office, Wash- 
ington, D. C. 20402. 



Plastics, Military Standardization 
Handbook MIL - HDBK - 700 (MR), 
Nov. 1, 1966. Provides current tech- 
nical infomation and design data of 
direct use to engineers and de- 
signers of military equipment involv- 
ing plastic applications, 1966. 266 p. 
Catalog No. D 7.6/2:700(MR), $1.60. 

Industrial Plant Equipment Hand- 
book, Contains standards describing 
industrial plant equipment that is 
managed and controlled by DOD prop- 
erty records. The subclassiflcation 
system of plant equipment codes in- 
cluded in these handbooks is within 
the framework of Federal Supply 
Classes and is used in conjunction 
with identifying industrial plant 
equipment reported on DOD property 
records. 

FSC 6650, 6670, Scales, Balances 
and Optical Instruments. 1966. 85 p. 
Catalog No. D 7.6/7:4216.18. 60(5 

FSC 6675, 6695, Combination & 
Miscellaneous Instruments Including 
Dynometers, 1986. 62 p. Catalog No. 
D 7.6/7:4216.21. 40# 

FSC 6105 6115, 6125, Motors, Gen- 
erators and Generator Sets, and Ro- 
tating Converters. 1966. 242 p. Cata- 
log No. D 7.6/7:4216.22, $1.60, 

FSC 4920 Aircraft Maintenance 
and Repair Shop Specialized 



S 33 ' 



' Separators 

Oatalog N ' 



Navy Contract Law, 1965 Supple- 
ment. The 1965 supplement is the 
second to Navy Contract Law (2nd 
Edition 1969), and covers significant 
changes within the scope of the book 
for the period January 1959 to Decem- 
ber 1964. Includes new text covering 
principal innovations in Navy con- 
tracting since 1959. 377 p. Catalog 
No. D 201.6;C76/D65/Bupp. $2. 



14 



Aerospace Bibliography (Third Edi- 
tion), Published by the National Aero- 
nautics and Space Administration, 
this bibliography contains informa- 
tion to help the general reader, and 
especially the teacher, to locate nu- 
merous books, teaching aids and films 
and film strips, on space flight sub- 
jects. 1966. 71 p. Catalog No. NAS 
1.19:36.604 

Policy Planning for Aeronautical 
Research and Development. Surveys 
relationships of civil aviation to na- 
tional transportation systems and poli- 
cies; relationships between the Fed- 
eral Government, industries, and the 
universities; and research and devel- 
opment necessary to advance this 
technology. A section is included of 
issues which may merit further con- 
sideration by the Congress. 1966. 279 
p. Catalog No. 89-2:S.doe90. $1. 

Industrial Security Manual for Safe- 
guarding Classified Information (At- 
tachment to DD Form 441). Estab- 
lishes requirements for uniform se- 
curity practices within industrial 
plants or educational institutions and 
all organizations used by prime and 
subcontractors having classified DOD 
information. Rev. 1966. 236 p. Catalog 
No. D 3.6/3:Se2/966. $1.60. 

Seismic Design for Buildings. This 
Army technical manual prescribes 
the criteria and furnishes guidance 
for the design of all buildings and 
other structures in seismic areas. 
These instructions are applicable to 
all elements responsible for design 
of military construction located in 
regions where seismic activity is indi- 
cated by seismic zone maps and tabu- 

lnV^ Sl A 966 ' 313 P- Catalog No. D 
101.11:5-809-10. $3,50. 

Shipboard Electrical Systems. Pre- 
pared by the Bureau of Naval Per- 
sonnel, this manual written primarily 
for engineering officers as an aid In 
gaming more knowledge of shipboard 
electrical systems, describes electrical 
equipment found on most typos of 
Naval vessels. Rev. 1966. 427 p. Cata- 
log No. D 208.ll/2:E12/7/966, $2.25 

ti5 ea < rin s on Militarv Posture and 
H.R. 13466. Presents the hearings on 
Military Posture and H.R. 13456 to 
^i' 12e a PP r P Ti ations during FY 
1967 for procurement of aircraft, mis- 
siles, naval vessels and tracked com- 
bat vehicles, and research, develop- 
men 'j ^ at and evaluation for the 
Armed Forces, and to maintain parity 
6 6 " military and civilian pay. 
alog No ' Y 4-Ar5/2a:966- 



1 Technology. 

by the Navy's Bureau of 
Ships. This publication, while not in- 
tended as a basic reference document 



for the design of sonar systems, will 
serve to highlight the significant areas 
with which the worker imiat bii con- 
cerned if he is to participato In the 
further advancement of soiwr tech- 
nology. 1966. 228 p. Catalog No. D 
211.6/2:So6. $2.25. 

Air Support, U. S. Marino Corps. 
Sets forth doctrine and techniques for 
the conduct and control of tnctkal air 
operations by Fleet Marino Forces, 
Contains information on: funda- 
mentals of Marine Corps aviation f 
the tactical air control and coordina- 
tion system; fundamentals of tnctfonl 
air operations; tactical air intelli- 
gence; tactical air planning nnd 
coordination; logistic support consid- 
eration for air support; execution of 
tactical nir operations, with miprn* 
dices and list of references. 1968, 202 
p. Catalog; No. D 214.9/4 :7-S. $3. 

BioenergeticB of Space Sutlo for 
Lunar Exploration. Reviews environ- 
mental information currently nvnil- 
able from astrophysical stutltra, nuii 
analyzes the metabolic load imposed 
on humans exorcising undor varied 
terrain and gravity comHtioiiH, tho 
metabolic cost of mobility restriction 
in space suits, and the problem of 
thermal control in lunar simcf! sirila* 
19G6. 140 p. Catalog No. NAS 
1.21:84. $1. 

The Study of Missiles Resulting 
from Accidental Explosions, A Man- 
ual for Investigators. Although this 
manual was written primarily with 
the explosives safety OUR! new In 
mind, it is also an excellent Riiiilfi use- 
ful to safety specialists in any indus- 
try. 1966. 61 p. Catalog No, Y 
S.At7:S/10. BOtf 

Short GIoSHsary of Space Terms. An 
authoritative compilation of lirlef 
definitions of technical ten-ins fre- 
quently used by space teclmntoRlats. 
1966. 51 p. Catalog No. NAS 1.21:1/2, 
25#, 

A Selected Listing of NASA Scien- 
tific and Technical Reports for 1865* 
Lists the NASA scientific and techni- 
cal reports in two sections, the first 
contains the bibliographic citations 
and abstracts arranged by BuUJect 
categories and the second contains 
five indexes which are: subjcctj cor- 
porate source, personal author, re- 
port/accession number and accession/ 
report number. 1966. 1,480 p. Catalog 
No. NAS 1.21:7024. $7, 



Publications that require remit- 
tance are available for purchases nt 
U. S. Government Printing Office, 
Washington, B.C. 20402. 



November 1966 



Air Movement of Fleet Marine 
r Force Units. Issued by the U.S. Ma- 
rine Corps, this Fleet Marine Force 
manual sets forth doctrine, proce- 
dures, and techniques for the air 
movement of Fleet Marine Force 
units. 1966. 235 p. il. Catalog No. 
D214.9/4:4-6. $1.50. 

Packaging and Handling of Dan- 
gerous Materials for Transportation 
by Military Aircraft. This Air Force 
manual provides instructions for pre- 
paring explosives and other danger- 
ous materials for shipment by mili- 
tary aircraft, These instructions are 
intended to assure that such mate- 
rials, when offered for shipment, arc 
properly prepared. The Basic Man- 
ual and Change 1 containing revised 
pages to the manual are listed below: 
Basic Manual. 1965. 275 p. il. Catalog 
No. D3Q1.7:71-4. $1.76. Change 1 to 
Basic Manual. 1966. 13 p. Catalog No. 
D301.7:71-4A. 10(f 

System Program Management Pro- 
cedures. This Air Force Systems Com- 
mand manual establishes require- 
ments, policies and procedures for the 
conceptual definition, acquisition and 
operational phases of a system pro- 
gram, It prescribes the significant 
management actions for integrating 
and fulfilling the responsibilities of 
the organizational elements involved 
In managing a system program. 
1966. 190 p. il. Catalog No. D301.46/ 
14:375-4. $2. 

Inventory of Automatic Data 
Processing Equipment in the Federal 
Government, July 1966. Provides in- 
formation on the number of elec- 
tronic computers in use throughout 
the Federal Government, including an 
identification of those which are pur- 
chased or leased, the purposes for 
which they are used, the average 
monthly hours in service, the cost of 
procurement and operation and the 
number of personnel employed in 
these operations, 1966. 300 p. il. Cata- 
log No. PrEx2.12!966. $1,75. 

A Performance Analysis of the 
Army External Cardiac Compressor 
(Stroke-Limited Model). Army's Harry 
Diamond Laboratories, July 1966. 33 
p. Order No, AD-637 619, $2. 

Physics of Failure in Electronics, 
Vol. 4. Rome Air Development Cen- 
ter, June 1966, 666 p. Order No, AD- 
637 529, $9.66. 

Electron Beam Techniques for 
Fabrication and Assembly of Parts 
for Electron Tubes. Hamilton Stand- 
ard Dtv., United Aircraft, for the 
Army, Aug. 1966, 369 p. Order No. 
AD-635 870. $1.76. 

Study of a Computer Directly Im- 
plementing an Algebraic Language. 
Columbia University for the Air 
Force, Jan. I960, 171 p. Order No. 
AD-633 727. $6. 

Computer Personnel Selection and 
Criterion Development: HI, The Basic 
Programming Knowledge Test. Uni- 
veristy of Southern California, for 
the Navy, June 1966. 51 p. Order No. 
AD-686 9S8. $2. 

A Study of Two Methods for Adapt- 
ing Self-Instructional Materials to In- 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



dividual Differences. Systems Devel- 
opment Corp., Santa Monica, Calif., 
for the Navy, June 1966, 63 p. Order 
No. AD-636 213. ?3. 

An Experimental Comparison of an 
Intrinsically Programmed Text and a 
Narrative Test. University of Cincin- 
nati, for the Air Force, July 1966. 
32 p. Order No. AD-635 001. $2. 

Vietnamese - English Dictionary 
(Vols. I and II). Joint Publications 
Research Service, Department of 
Commerce, Sept. 1966, 1,486 p. Order 
No. TT-66-34129 (JPRS:37,700) . $18 
a set. 

Information Storage and Retrieval. 

Gomel] University for the National 
Science Foundation, June 1966, 399 p. 
Order No. PB-173 196. $7. 

The Production, Testing and Evalu- 
ation of Ausformed Ball Bearings, 
Final Engineering Report. General 
Electric Co., Flight Propulsion Div., 
Cincinnati, Ohio, for the Nayy. June 
1906, 10G p. Order No. AD-637 576. $4. 

Optimum Mechanical Design Syn- 
thesis, Vol. I. ITT Research Institute, 
Chicago, 111., for the Army, June 1966, 
126 p. Order No. AD 637 595 $4. 

Machining Data Handbook. Metcut 
Research Associates, Cincinnati, Ohio, 
for the Army, Aug. 1966, 614 p. Or- 
der No. AD-036 106. $9. 

Explosive Forming of Sheet Metal. 
Translated from the Russian by the 
Air Force, 1964 (translated April 
1966), 186 p. Order No. AD-637 
055. $5. 

Management Planning and Control 
of Research and Technology Projects. 
Rand Corp., Santa Monica, Calif., for 
the Air Forco, June 1966, 70 p. Or- 
der No. AD-637 462. $3. 

Data Elements for a Cost Report- 
ing System for Computer Program 
Development. Systems Development 
Corp., Santa Monica, Calif., for the 
Ah- Force, Aug. 1966, 78 p. Order No. 
AD-637 804. $3. 

Current Results from the Analysis 
of Cost Data from Computer Pro- 
gramming. Systems Development 
Corp., Snnta Monica, Calif., for the 
Air Force, Aug. 1966. 100 p. Order 
No. AD-687801. $4. 

Structural Efficiency of Composite 
Materials for Aircraft Applications. 
General Electric Corp,, for the Air 
Force, April 1966, 52 p. Order No. 
AD-632 492. $3. 

Fundamental Relationships for Ab- 
lation and Hyperthermal Heat Trans- 
fer. Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab- 
oratory, April 1966, 64 pp. Order No. 
AD-633 677. $3. 

Optimum Message Length for a 
Data Communications System Using 
Retransmission Error Control. Mitre 
Corp., Bedford. Mass., for the Air 
Force, June I960, 41 p. Order No. 
AD-635 462. ?2. 

Optimization & Synthesis of An- 
tenna Arrays. General Electric Co,, 
for the Air Force, July 1966, 173 p. 
Order No. AD-638 084. $5, 

Method of Determining Safe Dis- 
tances from RF Transmitters, Army 
Misaile Command, Redstone Arsenal, 



Ala., May 1966, 15 p. Order No. AD- 
637 589. $1. 

Operational Evaluation of Multi- 
purpose Guy Stakes for Antenna An- 
choring. U.S. Marine Corps. Quantico, 
Va., June 1966, 49 p. Order No. AD- 
637 699. $2. 

Miniature Hydrogen Generator. 
Union Carbide Corp., Parma, Ohio, 
for the Army, Aug. 1966, 132 p. Order 
No. AD 637 242. $4. 

The Development of a Flame Fired 
Thermionic Generator. RCA for the 
Army, July 1966, 95 p. Order No. AD- 
634 538. .$3. 

New Fundamental Mechanism for 
an Energy Conversion Device, Frank- 
ford Arsenal, Philadelphia, Pa., 1966, 
57 p. Order No. AD-63B 007. $3. 

Nickel-Cadmium Battery Recondi- 
tioner. U.S. Navy Marine Engineering 
Laboratory, Annapolis, Md., Aug. 
I960, 32 p. Order No. AD-638 603, $2. 

Measurement Techniques for Silicon 
Solar Cells. Air Force Aero Propul- 
sion Laboratory, Aug 1 . 1966, 18 p. Or- 
der No, AD-63B 851. $1. 

Direct Energy Conversion Litera- 
ture Abstracts. Naval Research Lab- 
oratory, June 1966, 122 p. Order No. 
AD-636 584, $4. 

Shipboard Systems Costs: A Func- 
tional Analysis of Work Aboard Ship, 
MTRB Ship Number A Tanker in 
Domestic Service, National Academy 
of Sciences, for the Navy. Aug. 1966, 
39 p. Order No. AD-637 78G. $2. 



Government research and devel- 
opment reports ore available to 
science and industry at price indi- 
cated from; 

Clearinghouse for Federal and 
Scientific Information 

Department of Commerce 
Springfield, Va. 22161 

Authorized DOD contractors and 
grantees may obtain these docu- 
ments without charge from: 

Defense Documentation Center 

Cameron Station 

Alexandria, Va. 22314 



Military Handbook 
on Rubber Available 

A new handbook titled "Rubber and 
Rubber-Like Materials," MIL-IIDBK- 
149A, which gives the latest informa- 
tion on rubber materials, is now 
available to the public. 

The handbook is intended mainly 
as a source of technical information 
and design data for engineers and 
designers of military equipment. 

Different types of elastomers are 
included in the booklet, with pertinent 
information on their resistance to 
fluids and weathering, physical and 
electrical properties, deaign data and 
suggested applications* 

Copies may be obtained from the 
Naval Supply Depot (DCI), 5801 
Tabor Ave., Philadelphia, Pa., 19120. 



15 



Leadership today both industry 
and military must be keyed to 
thinking in terms of far-into-the- 
future requirements as well as being 
prepared for sudden change or modi- 
fication of present-day products and 
programs. 

This concept is an everyday mode 
of living and operating for those of 
us at the Air Force Flight Test Cen- 
ter (AFFTC), Edwards AFB, Calif. 

Perhaps best illustrative of our 
concept, of the many test programs 
currently under way at this huge 
Mojave Desert installation, is the 
XB-70A. Originally conceived as a 
follow-on bomber to replace the B-52, 
in the decade of its turbulent develop- 
ment from the drawing board in 1955 
to its first flight in 1964, the desig- 
nated use of this unique craft went 
through a series of changes from 
bomber to sophisticated surveillance 
system (RS-70) before its ultimate 
utilization as a vehicle for conducting 
research, including supersonic trans- 
port (SST) research. 

Although practical operation of the 
SST is not envisioned for several 
years to come, at least three other 
test programs presently active at Ed- 
wards are directly or indirectly con- 
cerned with it. These are the SR-71/ 
F-12 (Air Force-Lockheed), F-lll 
(Air Force-General Dynamics) and 
X-16 (Air Force-National Aeronau- 
tics and Space Administration-Navy) 
all of which have features under 
study for incorporation into SST 
design, 

During my first tour of duty with 
AFFTC (1959-60) as its deputy chief 
of staff for operations, the X~15 
rocket plane made its initial powered 
flight. Shortly thereafter, AFFTC re- 
ceived the first of three X-15's built 
by North American Aviation and 
turned it over to the National Aero- 
nautics and Space Administration's 
(NASA) Flight Research Center at 
Edwards for the then planned 60-mile 
and 4,000-miles-per-hour space probe 
research program. 

Since that time this remarkable trio 
of scientific research craft have made 
approximately 160 flights during 
which they have well exceeded the 
original program goals setting the 
current apeed record of 4,104 miles 
per hour with the number one craft 
in June 1962, and the current un- 
official altitude record of 364,200 feet 
in August 1963 with number three. 




Maj. Gen. Hugh B. Hanson 



Plans now call for programming a 
speed of Mach 8 and altitudes of over 
400,000 feet utilizing the rebuilt num- 
ber two X-15 (wrecked in a Novem- 
ber 1962 crash at Mud Lake, Nev.). 
It has been modified to carry an addi- 
tional 13,500 pounds of propellant in 
external fuel tanks, and is 29 inches 
longer with a height increase of 19 
inches. 

In addition to the X-15's specific 
design mission of obtaining data on 
hypersonic aerodynamics, problems of 
reentry heating, physiological and 
psychological problems, and the effec- 
tiveness of reaction controls, future 
projects programmed through 1967 
include: high altitude sky brightness, 
micrometeorite collection, ultraviolet 
stellar photography, heat exchanger 
program, atmospheric density meas- 
urements, horizon scanning and defi- 
nition, advanced integrated data 
system for future aerospace vehicles, 
rarefied wake flow experiment, super- 
sonic decelerators, and high tempera- 
ture leading edges for dissipation of 
extreme temperature effects. 

The millions of bits of data gath- 
ered on these flights have had and 
will have an immeasurable effect 
upon our manned space program as 




Maj. Gen, Hugh B. Manson, USAF, 
ia Commander, Air Force Flight Test 
Center, of the Air Force Systems Com- 
mand. Prior to this assignment he 
was Commander of the Systems Engi- 
neering Group of AFSC's Research 
and Technology Div, He is a command 
pilot with over 4,500 hours flying time. 



well as the design and construction 
of future supersonic vehicles such na 
the SST-typc craft. Tied together 
with other millions of pieces of (lulu 
garnered by the XB-70, phis the per- 
formance evaluations of the tLtiiimiin- 
honeycomb constructed, delta-whiffctl 
SR-71's and YF-12A's along with the 
swing-wing F-lll, should give our 
nation's aviation industry n wealth 
of SST background information on- 
joyed by no other country m tho 
world. 

The unique working relationship at 
Edwards between AFFTC and the 
contractor has paid off in a number of 
fashions with two main advunlajjos 
heading the list. First, communication 
between user and builder is gL'i>nlly 
simplified men can sit down totffttlmr 
and discuss problems after n five- 
minute drive rather than after n 
cross-country trip involving hun- 
dreds of dollars of travel nitmion* 
Many contractors have extensive fa- 
cilities on base. 

This advantage of physical prox- 
hnity also allows a first hand "over 
the shoulder" look at problcim mid: 
progress as results come in. Tlics re- 
sulting case of cooperation and coor- 
dination has been a great time Haver. 

The first Minuteman silo launch is 
a good example. At the start of my 
initial tenure at Edwards a tethered 
full-scale Minuteman solid proprllaiit 
missile was successfully fired from a 
silo here by the Directorate of Hockct 
Propulsion and Missiles now the Air 
Force Rocket Propulsion Laboratory. 
Boeing and Air Force personnel wore 
working together at the snmo nlnco 
at the same time with a common goal* 
It was a team effort. 

Less than nine months later, the 
eighth of 18 scheduled full-scale Min- 
uteman firings by The Boeing Co. 
became the final firing due to 
the program's success. Today, the 
Strategic Air Command has Minute- 
man I missiles on alert in under- 
ground launchers in five midwest 
states. Installation is also under way 
for improved Minuteman II missiles 
in one of these states and in one atl- 



16 



November 1966 



ditional state. Minuteman II will be- 
gin to replace Minuteman I this year. 

Another very highly successful test 
program in this line, which amply 
illustrates the thesis of thinking 
ahead and being prepared to modify 
program goals due to an unusual sit- 
uation, was that of the Lockheed C- 
141 aircraft Category II testing. 

Originally, one of the main mission 
objectives for the C-141 Joint Test 
Force called for approximately 1,000 
hours flying time on one of the test 
aircraft during the 12-month period 
(1964-GG) scheduled for the overall 
teat program. This was estimated to 
be the equivalent of about two years 
normal flying time for a Military 
Air Transport Service (now Military 
Airlift Command MAG) transport 
aircraft, which was to he the prime 
user of the C-141. 

However, far exceeding all antici- 
pated expectations, this C-141, flying 
out of Edwards, logged its initial 
1,000 hours in just six months. The 
joint test force then promptly upped 
its overall test program goal to 1,800 
hours, Relatively trouble-free opera- 
tion allowed flying up to 15 hours a 
day three times normal MAC utili- 
zation. On one occasion it remained 
aloft over 18 hours unrcfuelod and 
later made a 6, 535-mile non-stop 
flight. This caused the test force to 
shoot for a 2,000, then 2,400 and, 



finally, an unheard of 2,500 hours on 
this airplane for the 12-month period 
ending in June 1965. The goal was 
actually achieved in a little over 11 
months. This is a fine tribute to the 
smooth functioning of the close-knit 
Air Force, Lockheed, subcontractor, 
vendor and Army liaison personnel 
which comprised the C-141 Joint Test 
Force. 

Although less than 30 days after 
becoming operational in August 1965, 
the C-141 was providing the big mus- 
cle for MAC's airlift strength with 
daily flights to Vietnam transporting 
cargo and troops to Southeast Asia 
and bringing back wounded, there had 
long been an obvious need to develop 
an even newer, larger, long-range 
cargo aircraft to replace the aging 
C-124's and C-133's. Before the first 
prototype of the C-141 rolled off the 
assembly line in the spring of 1964, 
a study project was well under way 
at DOD and U. S. Air Force head- 
quarters tabbed Cargo Experimental- 
Heavy Logistics System (CX-HLS), 
for the development and procurement 
of this new jet transport aircraft. 

This aircraft was later designated 
the C-5A and, on Dec. 31, 1964, proj- 
ect definition phase contracts were 
awarded by DOD to Boeing, Lockheed 
and Douglas for the airframc, and to 
General Electric and Pratt and Whit- 
ney for the engine competition. On 




The X-15 research vehicle, which has been designed to probe the fringes of 
space, is released from its B-52 mother ship. 



Sept. 30, 1965, it was announced that 
Lockheed had been selected to develop 
and produce the aircraft with General 
Electric as manufacturer of the C- 
5A's 40,000-pound-thrust fan jet en- 
gines. 

The C-5A is being purchased under 
a new contracting concept known as 
"total package" procurement. Un- 
der this concept, one contract is 
awarded for development, production 
and support of the aircraft, including 
spare parts and ground equipment. 
This differs from previous procure- 
ment programs wherein one contract 
was awarded for development work 
and another for production. Under 
the total package concept, the aircraft 
manufacturer is responsible for total 
performance of the aircraft as an in- 
tegrated system. 

Construction of C-5A test facilities 
at Edwards is expected to get under 
way in April 1967, and the target 
date for our first test aircraft is 
October 1968. It will become opera- 
tional in 1969. 

An area of research at Edwards in 
which we have been vitally interested 
for more than a decade has been that 
of the V/TOL (Vertical Take-Off and 
Landing) aircraft. Currently under 
test are the U. S. Army XV-5A lift- 
fan research plane and the tri-Service 
XC-142A tilt-wing transport both of 
which appear to have great potential. 

Although each has the capability 
of taking off and landing vertically in 
an area slightly larger than that of a 
tennis court, they employ totally dif- 
ferent design techniques and princi- 
ples. Both aircraft are the result of 
a combined effort on the part of sev- 
eral different aircraft and engine 
companies. 

The Ryan Aeronautical Co. XV-5A, 
powered by two General Electric J-85 
jet engines, embodies the lift-fan 
principle to accomplish ita V/STOL 
(Vertical/Short Take-Off and Land- 
ing) . This consists of three fans two 
five-foot diameter lift fans, one in 
each wing, to provide lift for vertical 
take-off and landing, and a smaller 
nose fan used to provide lift, pitch 
trim and control which function 
through a combination of positioning 
inlet and exit louver doors above and 
below the fans. Valves divert the 
main jet exhaust flow to power the 
fans for vertical flight. For forward 
flight, the diverter valves close off ex- 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



17 



haust gases to the fans and allow 
operation as a conventional jet air- 
craft. 

Two of these aircraft were built, 
with the first conventional flight in 
May 1964, and first hovering flights 
in July of that same year. Although 
ono was lost in April 1965, the pro- 
gram is progressing. 

A pioneer in the area of V/TOL, 
this is not Ryan Aeronautical's first 
effort in the field. Back in the fall of 
1955 Ryan brought to Edwards a 
sleek, delta-winged craft called the 
X-13 Vertijet which was destined to 
become the world's first jet V/TOL 
aircraft. The design, fabrication and 
testing of the X-18 was an Air Force 
program, but behind it stood nearly 
10 years of Ryan-Navy research spon- 
sored by the U. S. Navy. 

Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., supported 
by Ryan and Killer aircraft com- 
panies, developed and built the XC- 
142A. It is the world's largest V/ 
STOL aircraft and the first developed 
by this nation for operational evalua- 
tion rather than the testing of a con- 
cept. A combined program of the Air 
Force, Army and Navy, it is also the 
nation's first of three tri-Serviee 
V/STOL aircraft programs. 

The XC-142A is a four-engine, 
turboprop, high-wing transport air- 
plane which uses the tilt-wing, de- 
flected slipstream concept to achieve 
V/STOL operation. It is powered by 
four General Electric T-64-GE-1 tur- 
boshaft engines which drive foul- 
Hamilton Standard lightweight fiber- 
glass propellers, each 16.6 feet in di- 
ameter, plus an eight-foot tail rotor 
and accessory equipment. All four en- 
gines are linked together by a unique 
interconnected drive shaft system so 
that even a single engine can turn 
over all four propellers and the tail 
propeller. 

Part of a system designed for swift 
transport of combat troops, equip- 
ment and supplies from assault ships 
or airfields into unprepared areas un- 
der all-weather conditions, it is capa- 
ble of speeds that belie its squared-off 
appearance. The airplane will be able 
to take off and land vertically in all 
types of terrain and achieve a top 
speed of more than 430 miles per hour 
in level flight. 

Five XC-142A aircraft were con- 
structed under the DOD contract 
awarded to Ling-Temco-Vought. Two 
of these aircraft were delivered to 



18 



the Tri-Service V/STOL Test Force 
at Edwards during the summer of 

1965, two additional ones in April 

1966, and the last one in May 19G6. 
More than 250 flights and 225 flight 
hours have been accomplished to date 
with some 25 pilots, including 15 
military, having flown tho aircraft. 

The huge number of helicopters and 
the vast extensiveness of their opera- 
tions in Southeast Asia have contrib- 
uted a great deal to the tremendous 
potentiality of these V/STOL-type 
aircraft and their impact on the fu- 
ture of aviation. 

Just as Southeast Asia helicopter 
actions have intensified the develop- 
ment of the V/STOL program, so 
have other applications of the unique 
type of jungle war practiced in this 
theater caused the Air Force Systems 
Command and AFFTC to take a sec- 
ond look at the Air Force aircraft 
inventory past and present as well 
as that of our sister Services, the 
Navy and Army, for solutions to some 
of the problems. 

Accustomed to dealing in the terms 
of more sophisticated Mach 2 and 
Mach 3 aircraft, we have had to re- 
adjust our thinking to the era of the 
subsonic. Supersonic fighters and 
fighter bombers, on low level missions, 
are hindered by their speed in proper 
target identification. They also have 



limited "time on station" or Joifa 
capability and are unable to thrott 
back sufficiently for helicopter cscor 

These factors proved that, control 
to popular thinking, the era of If 
World War II propel ler-drivnu ni: 
craft was not ended, but needed to t 
revitalized. Dipping- back into Wort 
War II stocks, we brought out of r< 
tirement one of tho hottest Uvfr 
engine bombers of its day the 11-2 
Invader which was modified by 111 
addition of a bigger and slroiifre 
wing plus more powerful engines fo: 
the operations envisioned, Aftnr motl 
ification the aircraft underwent Cnle 
gory II testing at Edwards during 
1964-65 and is now on operational 
duty with the 1st Air Commando 
Wing at Hurlburt Field, Flu., iut the 
B-20K. 

Another doughty warrior of World 
War II fame, which has proven to Iw 
an excellent all-purposn atrcrnft in 
the field in Vietnam, SB tlio Douglas 
A-1E Skyraidor, a propeller-driven, 
single-engine fighter/ fighter bomlwr 
which was obtained from tho Navy. 
Now under consideration an n follow- 
on jet replacement for the A-1K ia 
the Navy's subsonic A-7A Corfmir If, 
a light ground-attack aircraft devel- 
oped by Ling-Tempo- Voutfht l meet 
the specific requirements for allcick 




' 1 ' u 1 " ''*.; ' :' 4 I .1 J* I *) 

( ^ l| //*".. 1 '^/ 1 - '^"Sfei lf !J : 
^iollv / ^ J /^\V 1 '3lLr; ,*i>/ '< 

i .j.i-,i _, i s , ^ii'jj^jjji, ^atij^i^JiJsijfilJI., 

zed World War II B-2fl, is n light 
in support of Air Force couutcrln- 



Burgency operations. 



Octobsr 



and close support warfare. We expect 
, to have this aircraft for Category II 
testing at AFFTC. 

As an outgrowth of Southeast Asia 
effort, the U. S. Army Aviation Test 
Activity at Edwards will begin two 
tests sometime this fall. The first is 
the armed fighter-configured version 
of the Bell UH-1 helicopter, named 
the Huey Cobra. The second will be 
the armored "gun-platform" version 
of the Boeing-Vertol CH-47 in vari- 
ous weapons combinations of from 
seven to 10 guns or cannons plus gre- 
nade and rocket launchers. 

From the foregoing examples of 
AFFTC test and support activities, it 
is clear that the center satisfies more 
than Just the needs of the Air Force 
Systems Command. Our facilities are 
utilized to some degree by NASA, 
Avmy, Navy, Air Forco operational 
commands, contractors and friendly 
governments. In this latter category, 
tost work has been done for and by 
the German and Norwegian govern- 
ments. At present we have under way 
testing of the Northrop-Norair CF- 
5A by the Royal Canadian Air Force 
and in the future AFFTC will sup- 
port the F-4K (British) tests by Mc- 
Donnell Aircraft for the Air Force 
and Great Britain. 

Assistance to the commercial avia- 
tion industry is also of vital concern 
to ua and practically every major 
U. S. jet airliner flying today has 
tested its wings in some aspect at 
Edwards facilities. Currently under 
way is a year-long test program by 
Douglas Aircraft of the new elon- 
gated DC-8 Super 61, These tests of 
purely commercial products arc con- 
ducted on a non-interference basin 
and all costs incurred ai*e reimburs- 
able. 

What does the future hold in store 
for the AFFTC? Aside from the SST, 
major teat programs now in the plan- 
ning stage include the AMSA (Ad- 
vanced Manned Strategic Aircraft), 
B-111A, V/STOL strike-reconnais- 
sance fighter, advanced V/STOL 
fighter, advanced V/STOL light 
transport (CV-X), V/STOL intra- 
thcater transport (CV~6) and the 
manned hypersonic vehicle. 

With regard to the latter, prelimi- 
nary tests already are under way by 
NASA and the Air Force at Edwards 
with lifting bodies (M2-F2 and HLS- 
10), In addition our telemetry and 
tracking facilities are now tied Jn 



with, or will be tied in with, the Air 
Force Western Test Range and the 
Navy Pacific Missile Range and in the 
easterly direction to facilities located 
at Wendover, Utah. The Edwards 
area represents one site for land re- 
covery of space vehicles, especially 
when the western hemisphere's larg- 
est natural landing area is added 
Rogers Dry Lake, 29,632 acres or 
4G.3 square miles. Summed up, we 
like to think of the Air Force Flight 
Test Center and Edwards AFB as 
having this potential to contribute to 
the nation's space effort. 



Special Fuze Developed 
for Explosive Anchor 



High-Speed Computer 
Printouts Under Study 

Precise control of a laser's intense 
coherent light to position a beam to 
any of 131,072 points, within a space 
smaller than a match head and at 
speeds exceeding 100,000 selections 
per second, is under Army study for 
high-speed computer printouts. 

Now in exploratory development at 
the U.S. Army Electronics Command 
(ECOM), Fort Monmouth, N.J., the 
experimental equipment was produced 
under contract by the Systems De- 
velopment Division of International 
Business Machine Corp. 

Considering its potential to store 
data, provide printed readouts and 
project images, ECOM scientists en- 
vision a system in which such in- 
puts as typed material, charts and 
line drawings could be fed into a com- 
puter. Relayed hundreds of miles by 
radio to another computer, they could 
be processed and reproduced instantly 
as printed pages or as greatly en- 
larged screen displays, 

ECOM's experiments with the 
equipment are being carried out by 
the Display Techniques Team of the 
Communications and Automatic Data 
Processing 1 Laboratory headed by 
Colonel George M, Snead Jr. Pierce 
Siglin is the team leader and Erich 
F. Krai is project engineer. 



New Landing Mats 
Tested by Military 

Tri-Service testing of a new land- 
ing mat for use in construction of 
military airfields is now being con- 
ducted at Dyess AFB, Abilene, Tex, 

Tests will Include airfield construc- 
tion, landing and takeoffs by a variety 
of military aircraft, and recovery and 
disposition of materials on conclusion 
of the tests, 

Four types of metal landing mats 
will be installed at the test sitethree 
made of extruded aluminum and one 
of a new lightweight aluminum honey- 
comb. 

Headquarters, U.S. Air Force, is 
DOD executive agent for the test 
project. 



', S * Al ' my has designed and 
ed a safe, reliable fuze 
mechanism for use with the new ex- 
plosive embedment anchor beine: de- 
P ed a j the. U. S. Army ffiil ty 
ipment Center's Engineer R e - 

Laboratoi ' ies ' 



The new fuze, which will be used to 
set off the propellant charge driving 
the anchor into the ocean floor, in- 
corporates several special features. 

Because of its underwater use, the 
luzes electric components are incap- 
sulated m a rubber potting compound 
to prevent failure from water leakage. 
In addition, circuitry is designed so 
that the fuze will not arm itself until 
it is at least 27 feet below the water 
surface. 

Another circuitry design feature 
shunts the detonators to prevent pre- 
mature firing before the instant of 
impact. As additional safety features, 
the fuze will disarm itself if for any 
reason it is brought to the surface be- 
fore the propellant is ignited or will 
deactivate itself completely in the 
event of a misfire by draining both 
the battery and firing capacitor in 
about 40 minutes. 

The explosive embedment anchor is 
being developed as a mooring com- 
ponent and will replace the massive 
weight of ground tackle required in 
a conventional mooring point. 

Weighing 4,600 pounds, the experi- 
ment anchor can do the job of con- 
ventional ground tackle weighing 
about 33 tons. Incorporated in a multi- 
leg mooring system, it will permit 
safe mooring of tankers of up to 
40,000 dead weight tons. 



MTMTS Operations 
Booklet Available 

"Military Traffic Management and 
Terminal Service An Instrument of 
National Policy," an illustrated 32- 
page booklet which describes the re- 
sponsibilities, organizational struc- 
ture and operational procedures of 
Military Traffic Management and 
Terminal Service (MTMTS), is avail- 
able to the public. 

Produced by the MTMTS Office of 
Information, the publication stresses 
the fact that one of the most impor- 
tant ingredients in the field of logis- 
tics is transportation. 

MTMTS was organized two years 
ago and directs, controls and man- 
ages the movement of all military 
traffic in the United States. 

Copies of the booklet can be ob- 
tained by writing to Commander, 
Military Traffic Management and 
Terminal Service. Washington, B.C. 
20315. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



19 



Three times in this century alone, 
emergencies demanded expansion of 
the Government's civilian staff. Each 
emergency has led to a desperate 
search for executive talent to staff 
improvised organizations. Each time, 
fortunately, the Government eventu- 
ally was able to report its mission 
accomplished. 

It has become clear, however, that 
no emergency exactly duplicates its 
predecessor. We all know that an 
emergency wholly without precedent 
can befall us. Hard reality tells us 
that waiting until disaster strikes 
amounts almost to an invitation to 
disaster. Waiting for a crisis to come 
is no longer acceptable. 

To meet this challenge, the Execu- 
tive Branch and Congress created the 
National Defense Executive Reserve. 

The Executive Reserve is a land- 
mark in the stream of Government 
history. In the past, many agencies 
acted individually to prepare for an 
emergency, but no Government-wide 
coordination, geared to common stand- 
ards and objectives, was ever before 
attempted. 

In 1955 the Congress enacted an 
amendment to the Defense Production 
Act of 1950 authorizing the President 
to establish the National Defense Ex- 
ecutive Reserve and train its mem- 
bers. In 1956, under the authority of 
Executive Order 10660, the Federal 
Government began to build an organi- 
zation unique in American history. To- 
day this pool of trained civilian re- 
servists is one more vital component 
of national strength in emergencies. 

The Office of Emergency Planning 
(OEP), which coordinates in behalf of 
the President the broad field of emer- 
gency mobilization, coordinates the ac- 
tivity of the National Defense Execu- 
tive Reserve. Its current authority is 
derived from Executive Order 11179, 
issued on Sept. 22, 1964. 

Departments and agencies with mo- 
bilization responsibilities enroll re- 
servists from business, labor, argicul- 
ture and the academic professions, 
The professional status of the mem- 
bers of the Executive Reserve is as 
follows: 

Industrial Leaders: 
Firms with more than 

500 employees: 49% 

Firms with less than 

BOO employees: 28% 

Federal Government 

Officials; 1% 

State and Local Officials: 3% 




Labor, Trade and Profes- 
sional Society Leaders: 5% 
Educators: 3% 
Retired: 5% 
Other: 6% 
There are currently almost 4,000 
members of the Executive Reserve. 
Most of these members are assigned 
as follows: 

Department of Commerce 1,917 
Department of Defense 93 

Department of the Interior 240 
Department of Labor 106 

Federal Communications 

Commission 17 

Department of Housing and 

Urban Development 39 

Interstate Commerce 

Commission 759 

Office of Emergency 

Planning 250 

The Department of Agriculture is cur- 
rently recruiting members for the Ex- 
ecutive Reserve. 

Criteria for Membership in the Execu- 
tive Reserve, 

Candidates are selected and ap- 
pointed by heads of departments or 
agencies, with the concurrence of the 
Director, Office of Emergency Plan- 
ning, to assist in carrying out emer- 
gency responsibilities. Generally can- 
didates for membership are recruited 
by individual units or suggested 
by business, professional, or labor 
sources. Those selected are people of 
executive ability in specific areas. 

Candidates must be fully cleared 
for security by the Government be- 
fore they become reservists. 

The reservist and his employer must 
sign a statement of understanding in- 
dicating the reservists may attend 
peacetime training sessions and, in 
the event of a national emergency, be 
available for immediate Federal em- 
ployment in the area of his training. 
Reservists are expected to meet from 
time to time with their program di- 
rectors or regional directors in order 
to keep abreast of program develop- 
ments. Informational and training 
material usually require short reading 
time, (The training sessions are gen- 
erally limited to two days each year.) 

Reservists receive a certificate of 
membership in the National Defense 
Executive Reserve, and a letter from 
the head of the agency designating 



them as a member of a specific unit 
Also, appropriate identification and 
assignment documents are issued to 
each reservist to facilitate his en- 
trance on duty in an emergency. 

The reserve unit will furnish caclt 
member specific instructions as to 
where to report and the nature of his 
responsibility in an emergency, 

Reservists are trained both for gen- 
eral emergency work and, to some ex- 
tent, for specialized experience or 
knowledge, hut the Government way 
use him where ho is most needed. The 
training program is planned to avoid 
undue demands on the reservist's 
time, Regional training conforaicca 
are held not more than twice n year 
and a national training conference is 
normally held every three years, 
Training involves: 

Participation in test exercises and 
alerts to the extent practicable, 

Attendance at periodic meetings 
in which mobilization programs nre 
discussed in general. 

Personal consultation on specific 
mobilization problems relative to his 
area of competence. 

Reading of publications and other 
communications pertaining to pinna 
and program usually specifically re- 
lated to the reservist's emergency re- 
sponsibilities. 

The reservist receives no pny for 
his pre- emergency training activities. 
When called to duty in an emergency, 
he will become a Federal employee 
and will usually serve on a salary 
basis under pay schedules then In ef- 
fect. If circumstances require him to 
serve without compensation, ho will 
be allowed to do so, providing appro- 
priate legal authority then exists, 

Obligations of members of the mili- 
tary ready reserve normally would 
bar a candidate's designation as fin 
Executive Reservist. 

With respect to training activities, 
Executive Reservists who are not offi- 
cers or employees of the Executive 
Branch of the U. S. Government are 
exempt from the operation of sections 
203, 205, 207, 208 and 209 of Title 18, 
U. S. Code. Executive Reservist 
training within the meaning of this 

(Continued on Page Ji) 



November 1966 



3 M T W T F S. ! S M T W.f F S ', S M T W T F. S 



6,7 



27 28 29 30 



, 
3 45 6 



1 
7 8 



12345,'- -123 

8 10 II 12 4 5,6 7 8 910 

13 11 15 1G 17 18 19; 11 12 13 11 15 16 17 ; 10 11- 12 13 14 15 16 

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 .- 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 17 18 19 20 2! 22 23 

.;. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 



Maj. Gen. J. B. Bestic, USAP, Dep. 
Dir. for National Military Command 
System Technical Support, Defense 
Communications Agency, at Informa- 
tion System Science and Technology 
Congress, L. G. Hanscom Field, Mass., 
Nov. 23. 

Mr. B. B. Lynn, Dep. Dir., Defense 

Contract Audit Agency, at the New 
York State Society of Certified Public 
Accountants Meeting, New York, 
N.Y., Nov. 30. 



Lt. Gen. Austin W. Bctts, Chief of 
Research and Development, at Annual 
NIKE-X Management Conference, 
Burlington, N.C., Nov, 28-30. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

RAdm. Henry L. Miller, Chief of 
Information, at Navy League, San 
Antonio, Tex., Nov. 23; at Pearl Har- 
bor Day Luncheon, Philadelphia, Pa., 
Dec, 7. 



ANNUAL SURVEY 





DEFENSE INDUSTRY BULLETIN 
Business & Labor Division 
0-filce of Assistant Secretary of Defense 
(Public Affairs) 
Washington, D. C. 20301 


Necensai-y 
Poatago 
Required 


Continue Sending rj 
Remove Name from List ID 
My Address Is Correct Q 
(Including Zip Code) 
New Subscriber p Change my Address to; 
















Zip florin 









i rnn. f the mailing list of the Defense Industry Bulletin 

w required by tho Joint Congressional Committee on Printing. The above is a 

nHJr2 Q a f i. tho .u Survey i Car ? which has boen mailcfl t( > a" subscribers of the 
Tit ft ?'iX SCr 'nT Wh (I VV ot con }l llct o and return the card on or before 

wur I 'n n w r f emOVCd fr m . UlC mailin ff listl If >" ou lmvfl ot rccclvcd 

f a !lot - a rc 8la>- subscriber to the Bulletin and 
*"******, please clip, complete and mail the 



Adm. David L. McDonald, Chief of 
Naval Operations, at Armed Forces 
Staff Meeting, Norfolk, Va., Dec. 1: 
at Naval War College, Newport, E.I., 
Dec. 13; at Naval Academy Dinner, 
New York City, N.Y., March 7. 

RAdm. R. Whitaker, Commanding 
Officer, Military Sea Transportation 
Service, at Navy League, Newark, 
N.J., Dec. 1. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

Brig. Gen. L. A. Kiley, Commander, 
Air Force Missile Development Cen- 
ter, Holloman AFB, N.M., at Engi- 
neers & Scientists Meeting, Tucson, 
Ariz., Nov. 22. 

_ T Gen. J. P. McConnell, Chief of Staff, 
USAP, at Houston Forum, Houston, 
Tex., Nov. 29. 

Hon. Robert H. Charles, Asst. Sec- 
retary of the Air Force (Installations 
and Logistics), at American Institute 
of Aeronautics and Astronautics 
Meeting, Boston, Mass., Nov. 29-Dec. 
1 ; at Armed Forces Management 
Assn. Meeting, Dayton, Ohio, Dec. 16. 

Brig. Gen. J. S. Bleymaier, Com- 
mander, Air Force Western Test 
Range, at American Institute of 
Aeronautics and Astronautics Meet- 
ing, Boston, Mass., Nov. 29-Dec. 1. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



ICBM Realization 
Prog ram To End 

The largest disposal program un- 
dertaken by DOD since World War 
II, the Air Force's one-billion-dollar 
ICBM reutilization and disposal pro- 
gram, involving; the deaetivation. and 
phaseout of first generation missiles, 
is scheduled to end soon. 

The rcutilissation program affected 
99 Atlas sites, 18 Titan I complexes, 
168 launchers and 221 missiles, count- 
ing ICBM's on operational launchers, 
spares with operational units and 
missiles in storage and still at manu- 
facturers' plants. 

Re-use of missile equipment located 
at deactivated Atlas E and F and 
Titan I complexes has saved the Air 
Force over $900 million. 

_ Executive management for the en- 
tire program was performed by 
Headquarters, Air Force Logistics 
Command, and the San Bernardino 
Air Materiel Area, Norton AFB, 
Calif. 



21 



HEADQUARTERS, DEPAR1 



CH MICHAEL I SIROUWCUIIU I, 



BIR[CIQB if'fCIAL SIUPKS 

ESim. I1MDIR1 !BI1( 

iiiFFiwcpium 2an* van 

TCCMB[niTHIfCA$[CAiO iBIU WOT 



ASSISTANT CIIIIF Of ST*F( FOH INIH[IW1 
ACOFSJORIMflLICINCl WQIOIIN JDAVIi 

off ui" VACANCY 

istcuiivi COIBHUAV, m 



SlCllHtf ACtdMKG. . . 1,'R J II SCKRAVISflOi iCI 
ii RICTiH Of ARW S'JDCFt . . l.'t 9 ! I*I|M 
D HCtOIOFCOSIANAlVSIS. VRB JIBUNOS 
6 BOI C(VIIRn IIHANCING. US F SKiOWK 
EIS OF M*.'iACF(SNT . . . . Et, MC[i57in'. '. '. " 
OftCifBEVIIiViVIAllW. . Ull HPHBICK 
N*SS1I BUILDING 




OEPJIV CM I if Of SlAlf FOB PfflSONNfL 

DIP COFS F09 p[BSO,NfL LTQJKWOOINOUGII, , . Hilt KM! 

ASH DIP CMS IOH PEH5 MG H G iPARROW WH 5?W) 

BKwm cauRWAflo nim two 



MfUH (mllKV'Jft^l 
CEP CWS rose MIL OHItiKM, , . . I'l 




f 



THE AEUUTAM CEMRM 
IMEAOMAN) GEMBAl 

MGHN\tlHCWICKMAM MiH SCli) 

tt OfFICIB. tffl WIHIMI A MdilLAN , . Am ]fi] 



CIIIH OF CHA PUINi 
llfMPBLDOA. !n)ANDBSI5,SWI 
CHIEFOFOIAPlAIPli 
CHW)CHARL!SCBfltMN, IB Ml 



J_ 



November 1966 



[f OF THE ARMY CHIEFS AND EXECUTIVES 



.-JlRY OF IHE ARMY 



Uh>3 ilfTARY OF THC ARMY 

\\;- 'ei.ti . ., ........ fit it 'Jill 



FJIRinGHjF CIVIL MIIPI5I 

MKrtllUM.irnijarH jjjj-j ,jj;_, 

MR IIUBFRr A yjPKfllMHltYEH MOM IIM OPERATIONS! i m ii i'.JV 

MRS JAM FHAl.PIAlLiiCmVDIFrlUOK FOR CttWIlly SiLMKj'IS) JF1JO BHS 

'.'.R MSI Rl E VIM.6 rurc AS1 jj,.,] n)H 





DfPUTV OIIIF (JF srAIF FOR LOOISTICS 
DIP COFS FOS IKIStlCS UG L J IIKQW 

Assi ucnrsFORiocisTics men GIBSON 

ASStDCUIUORlOCIPBMI CWSMDIPRNEYIACIP.. 

ADCDFSFORlOOIMlIRfACI ICJMIIEtStR IH 

!<MIV(, IOlDrWllfl5llB 



DIR(C10ROFSUPP1V4MAFNI BQ J M IIFISfR, JR 

DIRfCTOB W INSTAUA1IW5 EW J C DAlRIMI'll . 

DIRfOOROflHANSPOIIIAIION ttt I C AlttNIACH. . . 



















i\i;si 

in 


i 




1IESURC 
I'.UIN NA 
IHIiUFlWWCfNERAI 


.... 23 


i 




HPLniSURCfONCf NEPAL 


_...-. 


i 




ffECIfllVtOFFICfR 










s 








1 








'-jif 

saw: 






tHIEPH CWilM 11)11 
HIKFWCOWJUNICATIClN 




t 




KPUTVCHIEIOrtOMM-llf 








(a R:BRAN[... , 



am 
wn? 

BH! 



CHIEf. Olf ICf OF R1SFRH CWIPOWINTS 

CHIIF, OFC Of BfS CWJPMIN1S 1FG I [ IHROCKWOfitffll , Hill UIM 

K" CIHEf BC I A KiNW ![H4 iHM 

"KlITIVl CdMPMAN ?[S!J iHJ! 



Oil IF, AMY RlilRVI 

emir 




DIPIPT* cititr 




Fxicunvt wricf R 















CHilFWlNCINilBS 
IUMP B1DG 17. CRAVULV POINII 
ClllftDDNCIN[fBS 




CtllEF OF SUP 

IIFMP BLIW , 1 

CM IB 


DEPUIV ClllfF OF [NGINCFRS 






iiFcunvr 













Defense Industry Bulletin 



23 




MEETINGS AND SYMPOSIA 



DECEMBER 

15th Annual Wire & Cable Sym- 
posium, Dec. 7-9, at Atlantic City, 
N.J. Sponsor: Army Electronics Com- 
mand. Contact: Milton Tenzer, Elec- 
tronic Parts and Materials Div., 
Electronics Components Laboratory, 
Army Electronics Command, Fort 
Monmouth, N.J. 07703. (Area Code 
201) 535-1834. 

Fourth Symposium on Unconven- 
tional Incrtial Sensors, Dec. 6-7, at 
the Department of State Auditorium, 
Washington, D.C. Sponsors: Naval 
Air Systems/Ordnance Systems Com- 
mands; Research & Technology Div., 
(AFSC), and the Institute of Naviga- 
tion. Contact: Capt. Ross E. Freeman, 
USN (Ret.), Executive Dir., Institute 
of Navigation, Suite 912, 711 14th St., 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005. (Area 
Code 202) 783-3296. 

American Ordnance Assn. Sympo- 



sium on the Fabrication and Utiliza- 
tion of Lightweight Armor, (Classi- 
fied), Dec. 13-14, at the Army Tank 
Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 
Sponsor: American Ordnance Assn. 
Contact: Director for Advisory Serv- 
ice, American Ordnance Assn., Trans- 
portation Building, Washington, D,C. 
20006. 

First Nuclear Criticality Safety 
National Topical Meeting, Dec. 13-15, 
at Las Vegas, Nev. Sponsors: Ameri- 
can Nuclear Society and organizations 
and contractors of the Atomic Energy 
Commission, NASA and the Air 
Force. Contact: A. J. Smith, Nuclear 
Reactor Safety Group (WLAS-1), Air 
Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland 
AFB, N.M. 87117. 

JANUARY 

Symposium on Circuit Design by 
Computer, Jan. 30-31, at New York 



University, Bronx, N,Y. Sponsor: Of- 
fice of Nnval Research. Contact: Cdr. 
D. D. Kilpatrick, USN r Offlcc of Nnval 
Research, Dcpfirtmcnt of tho Nnvy, 
Washington, D.C, 203GO. (Area Coit 
202), OXford 0-3082. 

MARCH 

Symposium on Modem Option, sev- 
enteenth in a series of International 
symposia organized by Microwave 
Research Institute, Mnrch 28-30, ol 
New York City. Sponsors: Air Force 
Office of Scientific Research, Ofllro of 
Naval Research and Army It c search 
Office. Contact: Lfc. Col. K. P. Gahn 
Jr., (SREE), Air Force Office of Sci- 
entific Research, Tempo D, 4th nnd 
Independence Avo., S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20383. (Area Code 202) OXforJ 
6-8671. 



Defense Electronic Supply Center 
Strives for Reliability and Economy 

I the Dirppfnvntn nf !?_ ,,,,,,j._ 11. _ 



_ Engineers of the Directorate of En- 
gmeenng Standardization, Defense 
hlectromcs Supply Center (DESC), 
Dayton, Ohio, are in the process of 
consolidating specifications covering 
parts for various weapon systems. The 
group, which is spearheading a drive 
to show that reliability can be eco- 
nomical, expects that the plan will 

Ult ] m ?SL save the Military Services 
and UkSC a sizeable sum without 
endangering reliability standards. 

Established reliability specifications 
cover many of the technical require- 
ments for parts used in the Minute- 
m V UBSI l e a "d the P-lll aircraft. 

W ^Sfh np 1^ rs ' howe y er ' are meet- 
with military and industrial rep- 

ats to resolve differences fn 
requirements so that 



parts, the consolidation of specifica- 
tions and specification sheets are ex- 
pected to have a major impact on the 
Defense pocketbook. By merging two 
01 three sheets from several specifica- 
n ,s into one there would only be one 
part to stock instead of two or three, 
bogistics-wise there would only be 
one stock number to manage. 

A1 " when, the need for the extra 
" 'on is removed, the 
the general 
pears. The 

* . -.41.*- ".f ^-^411v*ClLaWn 

nM =r,: "<*" i? made easier when only 
one specification must be revised. 

ine major objective of the con 
soUdated specification effort is to 
increase the quantities that can be 
procured under one specification. Ac- 
curem? t economi c |aws M . 

ShS^S^^ 



specifications cover 

for p flrts S 



In terms of economy for electronic 



24 






required. Since each specification re- 
quires the same teats, the rc'ducllnn 
of one would result In reducing (he 
number of sample units to do ti^tcJ 
by one-half. Consolidation of tlawo 
specifications, therefore, would rciltiw 
the number of Hamplo units by two- 
thirds, 

DESC officiate also cited Urn possi- 
bility of increased competition <m pro- 
curements under the coiiKolidnlod 
specifications. A contractor wmild not 
ba t required to qualify for tlio re- 
quirements of several specfflcntloTsa 
where duplicates exist. In other words, 
qualifying under one specification 
could make him eligible for bidding on 
several other parts. 

The program is concentrating on 
resistors, capacitors and Kenii-coimluc- 
tors since these are more commonly 
used by the Military Departments ami 
readily lend themselves to alnmlordf- 
zation. Documents for Insulated fixed- 
film resistors are currcnty undergoing 
coordination in the field. Two cithern 
a solid-electrolyte fixed capacitor and 
another type of fixed-film reslslor 
are being readied for coordination. At 
least six specifications have bocn 
identified for review and tho directo- 
rate is hopeful that the projects can 
be completed before the end of 10G6 
or early in 1967. 



November 1966 




Address by Hon. Paid R, Ignatius, 
Aast, Secretary of Defense (Installa- 
tions & Logistics), at the Annual 
Luncheon of the National Security 
Industrial Asan,, Washington, D, C., 
Oct.G,198G. 




Hon. Paul R. Ignatius 

Logistical Support 
in Southeast Asia 

I would like to discuss with you the 
logistical support of our military op- 
erations in Southeast Asia. Ensuring 
that our forces there have the re- 
sources they need to carry out their 
missions is the number one responsi- 
bility of the materiel secretaries and 
the logistics chiefs today, and it is 
ateo a principal concern of many of 
the companies represented here. There 
have beon many problems as well as 
accomplishments, and I will touch on 
both, We have asked a great deal this 
past year from defense industry as 
well as our military logisticians. Both 
havo responded in a magnificent man- 
ner. Indeed, General Victor M, Kru- 
lak, Commander of the Fleet Marine 
Forces, Pacific, stated after a visit to 
Vietnam earlier this year that the 
supply situation in Vietnam "is gen- 
erally better in this war than in any 
war in the modern era." 

Transportation. 

First, I would like to review sev- 
eral highlights in the field of trans- 



portation. There is a saying in the 
transportation field that "nothing hap- 
pens until a move is made." Trans- 
portation is the link between produc- 
tion and consumption the means by 
which we deliver what you make to 
the troops who use it. 

It is one thing to move supplies 
through a system where facilities are 
well established; it is quite another 
where facilities are virtually non- 
existent. There was in South Viet- 
nam, as late as a year ago, only one 
deep water port Saigon. There were 
neither roads nor railroads available 
to us to move supplies from that port 
to our forces up-country. Yet in the 
first six months after our major de- 
ployments began, 200,000 troops were 
moved into the counti'y and supplied 
with the thousands of items needed 
for combat operations and their health 
and welfare. 

Airfields and port complexes now 
exist where before there wei-e only 
sand dunes and rice paddies. The port 
of Cam Eanh Bay is a good example. 
There, on an undeveloped beach, we 
are constructing one of the largest 
deep water ports in Southeast Asia. 
Other ports have been constructed or 
improved all along- the coast. In tho 
last year the port capacity in South 
Vietnam as a whole was increased by 
more than 300 percent, and additional 
capacity is now under construction. 

Tho importance of this increase in 
port capacity can be illustrated by 
just a few figures. In mid-year 1966, 
176,000 measurement tons were being 
shipped by sea each month from the 
United States to South Vietnam. In 
August 1966 over 600,000 tons wero 
shipped. One year ago, the total mil- 
itary cargo discharged through Viet- 
nam ports averaged 12,500 measure- 
ment tons per day. Today the averago 
is 40,000 measurement tons. The deep 
water ports now in operation at stra- 
tegic points along the coastline are 
easing the pressure on the port of 
Saigon. 

To meet dally consumption needs as 
well as to build up theatre stock lev- 
els, it has been necessary to increase 
our sea and airlift capability. In Au- 



' _J 

gust 1965 the Military Sea Transpor- 
tation Service operated or controlled 
299 ships. This number was raised to 
459 ships by August 19C6. In addition 
to these controlled ships:, space is also 
used on regularly scheduled commer- 
cial ships which carry less than ship- 
load lots of military supplies. Addi- 
tional ships are now being reactivated 
from the National Defense Heserve 
Fleet and will soon be in operation to 
provide still more capacity. 

"We have also increased the number 
of aircraft operated or controlled by 
the Military Airlift Command. Mis- 
sions flown to South Vietnam in- 
creased from 650 in August 1965 to 
900 in August 1966. During this pe- 
riod, tonnages shipped by air have 
tripled. 

A logistics pipeline of this magni- 
tude extending over a distance of some 
10,000 miles involves a host of inter- 
related factors, all of which must be 
brought into play in their proper time 
and place. Production, transportation, 
handling, storage and, ultimately, re- 
ceipt on the far shores for onward 
distribution to combat units must 
each be related to the other as well 
as to the facilities all along the pipe- 
line. Obstructions at any point pro- 
duce a chain reaction that affects tho 
efficiency of the entire system. For 
example, the inability to handle cargo 
in the overseas ports results in hold- 
ing largo numbers of loaded ships 
awaiting discharge. This, in turn, re- 
duces the total shipping- capability 
and, thus, clogs the pipeline on this 
end. More importantly, the resulting 
congestion could prevent the more es- 
sential supplies from getting through. 

While some problems remain, we 
havo come a long way since Novem- 
ber 1965 when port congestion reached 
a peak with 122 ships awaiting dis- 
charge in Vietnamese waters. As 
someone observed at the time, if noth- 
ing else these 122 ships proved that 
ten ports in the United States could 
load ships faster than one port in 
Vietnam could unload them. Today, 
with the port development that has 
already taken place, together with im- 
proved shipping 1 practices, about 60 
ships with military cargoes are in 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



25 



Vietnam ports, which is just about 
normal for the tonnage involved. 

The lessons of the last 12 to 15 
months have emphasized the need for 
further research in the field of mate- 
rials distribution and handling. We 
need to take more of a "systems" ap- 
proach to the movement of materiel, 
identifying and properly allocating 
the many types of costs involved so as 
to make sound equipment decisions. 
In addition to looking at the problem 
from the wholesale supply level, we 
need to place greater emphasis on 
materials handling and movement in 
tactical units. Undoubtedly many of 
you here are interested in problems 
of this kind. 

To shorten reaction time and to in- 
crease the responsiveness of logistics 
activities iu the support of operating 
forces, whether it be in the form of 
supplies or service, remains a primary 
objective of the logistician. The Red- 
ball Express operation to Vietnam is 
a good illustration of the quick re- 
action concept. During- World War II 
there was a time when the allied 
advance through Prance was threat- 
ened because the bomb-damaged rail- 
roads couldn't handle the volume of 
supplies moving to the front line. The 
response to that threat was the use of 
a huge fleet of trucks whose Eedball 
markings became a symbol for the 
high priority, essential supplies they 
carried directly to the front as fast as 
the trucks could roll. 

Today we have a new Rcctball Ex- 
press. This time the roads are air- 
lanes stretching from Travis AFB in 
California to Ton Son Nhut Airfield 
in Vietnam. The carriers for today's 
Redball Express are primarily four- 
engine jet aircraft traveling at 400 
to 600 miles per hour, 

The Redball Express keeps heli- 
copters, tanks, LARC's, bulldozers, 
trucks and other major equipments off 
(leadline and ready to go in spite of 
the rough and intensive use they en- 
counter. The system is designed to 
deliver the required repair part to the 
mechanic who needs it within 168 
hours (seven days) after he calls for 
it. Since the Redball Express was es- 
tablished in. December 1966, more than 
13 million pounds of high priority 
cargo have been airlifted to Saigon. 
Construction. 

Port development was only a part 
of the overall construction task that 
faced us in South Vietnam a task 
that had to be accomplished within 



the constraints imposed by the ex- 
treme heat, the high humidity, the 
monsoon seasons, and the interdiction 
of the highway and railroad systems 
by the Viet Cong. 

In addition to the 10 major ports 
with 25 deep water berths, the con- 
struction program includes four ma- 
jor logistic depots, 24 airfields of all 
types, brigade or equivalent conton- 
ments at 40 different locations, 12 
bases for coastal patrol and river 
patrol activities, plus all of the other 
facilities required for military opera- 
tions such as troop housing, messing 
and service, supply and maintenance, 
petroleum distribution, warehousing, 
communications, administration, hos- 
pitals, utilities, and even roads and 
bridges. 

Programs for out-of-country sup- 
port of Vietnam include airfields, 
logistical bases, hospitals and other 
support facilities throughout the 
Western Pacific as well as training 
bases and support facilities in the 
United States. 

Before U.S. combat troops were 
deployed to Vietnam, one major con- 
tractor the joint venture of Ray- 
mond International and Morrison and 
Knudsen (RMK) was doing a lim- 
ited amount of work in the country. 
In May 1965, the contractor was di- 
rected to increase his rate of work- 
in-place from two million dollars per 
month to $26 million per month. This 
was later increased to $40 million per 
month a rate now being achieved. To 
meet the demands of the greatly en- 
larged effort, two additional firms 
were brought into the joint venture. 

The contractor's work force was 
increased to some 51,000 people, in- 
cluding 4,200 U.S. citizens, 5,800 third 
country nationals (mainly Koreans 
and Filipinos) and 41,000 Vietnamese. 
To add to the difficulties, skilled labor- 
ers were in extremely short supply 
and training facilities were non-exist- 
ent. Thus it was necessary for the 
contractor to import the essential hard 
core of needed skilled workers, and 
teach the rest the basic elements of 
a skill or trade. The skills the Viet- 
namese have learned as a result of the 
construction program will be of last- 
ing value to the country, 

In this connection, it is important 
to note that the straggle in Vietnam 
involves much more than military 
operations, Equally important are the 
comprehensive social and economic 



programs. These programs require 

significant logistics support involving . 
a wide range of commodities ant! a 
complete distribution system. DOD 
works closely with the Agency for 
International Development (AID) in 
order to maintain the right balance 
between military and economic pro- 
gram priorities and to ensure the 
maximum utilization of the limited 
distribution system facilities avail- 
able. As one example of this coopera- 
tion, AID cargo is now entering fhe 
military pipeline in the United States 
and moving under military control to 
its destination in Vietnam. 

Material Support, 

Having briefly covered the trans- 
portation system and the supporting 
base structure, I would now like to 
comment on the material which is 
flowing through this pipeline. 

Winston Churchill's rule of thumb 
for wartime expansion may provide 
one index of the effectiveness of our 
logistical effort. "For the first year 
or so you get nothing, in the next 
year a trickle, in the third year a 
flood." In the case of Vietnam, in 
only a year or so we are approaching 
a tidal wave. 

The acid test of any logistics sys- 
tem is the ability of our forces to lake 
the field and engage in combat. That 
ability has been demonstrated in full 
measure in Vietnam. The performance 
of the Miitary Services led Charles 
Burke, in Fortune Magazine, to con- 
clude that probably no comparable 
war has ever been mounted as swiftly 
and as efficiently. 

In FY 1966 military contract 
awards reached a total of $38.2 bil- 
lion. This is the largest military pro- 
curement program since 1962 and 
almost $10 billion more than in FY 
1966. The increase, of course, is at- 
tributable to Vietnam, and the re- 
quirements of the war dictate the 
mix of procurement. 

Some 15 percent of the materiel 
tonnage flowing to Vietnam Is ammu- 
nition. The air munitions pipeline, for 
example, contains 120,000 tons. In 
addition, we have over 130,000 tons 
of air munitions stocked in South- 
east Asia. Since June we have been 
producing more air munitions than 
we have been consuming; thus we 
are not only meeting- current ex- 
penditures but also replenishing our 
stockpiles. The monthly expenditure 
rate, as you know, is very high, 



November 1966 



amounting to over two and one-half 
times the average monthly expendi- 
ture rate of the Korean War. Should 
a higher expenditure rate become 
necessary, we are prepared to sup- 
port it. The ammunition production 
program has required the reactivation 
of 10 standby Government ammuni- 
tion plants and, in addition, a large 
segment of U.S. industry is partici- 
pating. 

The aircraft production program is 
equally significant. Production rates 
for the F-4 and for several of our 
helicopters have been sharply accel- 
erated. Equally important has been 
the greatly expanded production of 
aircraft repair parts needed to keep 
the air fleets operating. 

But the war demands more than 
munitions and aircraft. Its effect is 
also felt by the Defense Supply 
Agency (DSA) which furnishes the 
soft goods and common items of sup- 
ply. DSA's contracts in FY 1966 to- 
talled $4.4 billion, up $2.6 Million from 
the prior year. Two interesting ex- 
amples of DSA's contributions are the 
new lightweight combat uniform and 
the new tropical combat hoot. Both 
Items were originally intended only 
for the Army's Special Forces Units, 
but their characteristics were particu- 
larly well-suited to Vietnam and they 
are now being furnished for all of our 
combat forces there. Since June of 
Isist year, DSA lias awarded contracts 
for more than five million of these 
uniforms, and over one million have 
already been shipped to Vietnam. The 
tropical boot has required the estab- 
lishment of six production sources and 
the development of new molds and 
bonding processes. Again, over n mil- 
lion pairs have already been delivered 
to Vietnam. 

The supplies and equipment needed 
in Vietnam involve a very large pro- 
portion of the more than three mil- 
lion different items stocked by the 
Military Services. Each of these items, 
in its own way, can be essential to 
operations at any one time or place. 
Stocked all over the world, in hun- 
dreds of supply points, the centralized 
control of these items and the assur- 
ance of their availability at the time 
and place needed is an extremely 
demanding task. Anyone who has had 
experience with large supply systems, 
In Government or in industry, knows 
that somewhere, sometime, some 



place, something will be lacking. This 
will occur no matter how much money 
is spent. It simply reflects the fact 
that no system involving hundreds of 
thousands of people and millions of 
items spread around the globe can 
ever be 100 percent perfect. 

Despite the difficulties involved, our 
supply systems have provided what 
was needed. This fact has been re- 
peatedly emphasized by our senior 
military commanders. General West- 
moreland has stated that there have 
been "no shortages in supplies for the 
troops in Vietnam which adversely 
affect combat operations or the health 
and welfare of the command." General 
Wheeler, the Chairman of the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff, and other military 
leaders who have inspected our com- 
bat operations in Vietnam have come 
to the same conclusion. 

The accomplishments of the Mili- 
tary Services gain added significance 
when the circumstances under which 
they have been attained are fully 
appreciated. We have deployed 316,- 
000 troops to Vietnam and mounted 
an accelerated defense production 
program during a period when the 
U.S. economy has been operating at 
unparalleled levels of civilian de- 
mand and general prosperity. Yet we 
have met our needs without imposing 
the usual wartime controls. 

No mobilization has been decreed, 
either partial or otherwise. 

No reserves forces have been or- 
dered to active, duty. 

No significant restrictions have 
been placed on the civilian economy. 

No economic controls over wages, 
prices, profits, or materials have been 
imposed. 

Yet all of our military commitments 
have been met and we hold in readi- 
ness a strong reserve force and a 
healthy and productive economy to 
meet any additional contingencies 
that may arise. 

Clearly the logistics accomplish- 
ments of the past year could not have 
been achieved without the whole- 
hearted and able support of American 
industry. We must continue to work 
productively together. It is important 
that we give you as much advance 
notice as we can of our military re- 
quirements. It is important that you 
meet your production schedules and 
hold your costs to a minimum. 



Excerpt from address by Hon. 
Alexander H, ?lax, Asst. Secretary 
of the Air Force (Research and De- 
velopment), at American Institute of 
Aeronautics ard Astronautics Space 
Simulation Conference, Houston, Tex,, 
Sept. 8, 1966. 




Hon. Alexander H. Flax 

Space Technology 
Comes of Age 

******** 

... the high vacuum technology 
which was in the first instance the 
source of much of the initial knowl- 
edge for space simulation has now be- 
gun to benefit from some of the tech- 
nical advances made in the develop- 
ment of space simulators. Similarly, 
in the field of aerodynamic decelera- 
tors, parachute development for high 
speed military aircraft use in the 
period during and after World War 
II provided the basis for space cap- 
sule recovery both manned and un- 
manned; continuing development of 
parachute space capsule recovery sys- 
tems, in turn, provides a significant 
source of new ideas on parachutes 
which must operate under high shock 
or higher speed conditions. 

It is this interdependence of vari- 
ous fields which characterizes the 
social environment of modern science 
and technology and is, I believe, the 
correct interpretation of what some 
have sought to describe in terms of 
technological fallout theory, 

It would be absurd to argue that, 
if better high vacuums are needed 
for thin film deposition, we should 
concentrate research and develop- 
ment work on better space chambers 
or that, if we need controllable para- 
chutes for improved tactical airdrop, 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



27 



we should concentrate more effort on 
parachute -guided maneuverable re- 
entry vehicles. 

Nevertheless, it can be argued that, 
if two complementary efforts with 
quite different objectives in high vac- 
uum systems or in parachute decele- 
rators exist, the total output of these 
efforts may well be greater than the 
sum of the parts. 

Thus space technology may be said 
to have come of age in a purely 
technical sense. It is now a full part- 
ner with other technical fields lying 
on the frontiers of the technical ap- 
plication of knowledge. Such fields 
are characterized not by a static, un- 
changing body of knowledge, concepts 
and techniques, but a dynamic inter- 
action between new scientific and 
technical and the economic, social, 
military, or political factors affecting 
applications. Of course, almost any 
area of technical application, no mat- 
ter how mature, is susceptible to up- 
set by a new discovery. Witness, for 
example, the relatively old and stable 
art of shipbuilding in which roll sta- 
bilizing venes and, more recently, the 
"bulbous nose" have proven to be sig- 
nificant innovations as evidenced by 
widespread application. In the tech- 
nical fields near the frontiers of the 
application of knowledge, the occur- 
rence of much innovations is more 
frequent and their nature more radi- 
cal. 

But there are other and more dra- 
matic evidences that space technology 
has come of age. Here at Houston we 
cannot better begin an enumeration 
of such evidence than by citing the 
steady measured pace of accomplish- 
ment in the Gemini Program. It 
would not be proper to describe the 
achievements in this program as rou- 
tine since almost every flight intro- 
duced some new and previously un- 
tried element of manned space 
operating capability; yet the discrete 
operations from launch to recovery 
have come to be performed with such 
predictability that there is a strong 
temptation to regard some of them as 
almost routine. 

The two major large vehicle devel- 
opment programs which we in this 
country have been pursuing and 
which are presently in flight status 
have achieved a degree of success, 
even in early development launches, 
which would have been con sidered 
only remotely believable had it been 
offered as a prediction five years ago. 



The evident reliability which has 
been designed and built into these 
vehicles has been accompanied by a 
decrease in the unit cost per payload 
pound launched into low orbit to fig- 
ures on the order of $600. 

The reliability of space launch ve- 
hicles is a significant factor to the 
user and will remain so no matter 
what the reduction in the costs of 
launch vehicles may eventually be, as 
long as payload costs remain high, 
but cost is not the only factor here. 
Failure to launch at the prescribed 
time can be a major detriment in 
certain types of missions. In the 
period when the reliability of space 
launch vehicles was unacceptably low, 
there were many hypotheses as to 
what approaches might be used to 
improve the launch vehicle reliability. 
Among these were: 

Particularly simple designs with 
minimum mechanical and electronic 
complexities were to be preferred. 

* Repetitive experience with speci- 
fic hardware was necessary. 

Rigorous discipline to limit even 
minor changes had to he exercised. 

There is no doubt even today that 
all of these factors have a bearing 
on the reliability of launch vehicles. 
However, the application of rigorous 
engineering disciplines in design, 
manufacture, qualification testing and, 
more important than any of these, 
launch procedures has proved to be 
single factors. 

It probably remains true that the 
cost of applying these rigorous pro- 
cedures can be minimized by adher- 
ence to some of the precepts which 
had been advanced earlier, but it is 
now clear that even entirely new ve- 
hicles can be made to achieve a high 
degree of reliability early in their 
test program as long as the maximum 
advantage is taken of experience both 
in the hardware and in an engineer- 
ing sense. 

Up to this time, almost all of the 
DOD and NASA missions in the pay- 
load category above 200 pounds have 
been launched with vehicles which 
drew heavily on the technical and op- 
erational maturity of hardware de- 
rived from the ballistic missile pro- 
gram, principally Thor, Atlas and 
Titan. In the near future, entirely 
new rocket motors and launch ve- 
hicles, particularly those under devel- 
opment for the NASA Luner Land- 
ing Program, will alter this situation. 

Also, on the DOD side, the Titan 
IIIC solid motors represented a de- 



velopment "ab initio" although the 
technology for such motors depended 
in major degree on Polaris and Min- 
uteman antecedents. However, up to 
this point, our national launch ve- 
hicle program has had an "erector 
set" or building block character. Ele- 
ments of the Thor, Atlas and Titan 
have been mated with the Agena 
stage and other upper stages ami, in 
the case of the Thor and Titan, aug- 
mented with strap-on lower stages. 
These vehicles, such as Thor, Thor- 
Dolta, Thrust-Augmented Thor, At- 
las-Agena, have demonstrated relia- 
bilities (expressed at the ratio of 
successful launches to total launches) 
of 90 per cent or greater during the 
past year. 

The use of building blocks has, 
therefore, already been demonstrated 
to be capable of furnishing 1 a highly 
versatile, effective and reliable family 
of launch vehicles in spite of the con- 
ceptual and philosophical arguments 
which are sometimes advanced 
against this approach primarily on 
the ground that it precludes the op- 
timization of particular launch vehi- 
cles for particular missions. 

Foi* economic reasons, as well as 
the sound engineering reasons men- 
tioned before, the building block con- 
cept in launch vehicles is undoubtedly 
here to stay, but it is safe to say tlmt 
the building block inventory will 
gradually expand over the next sev- 
eral years as the Saturn I-B and 
Saturn I stages reach maturity, 

The success of space systems per- 
forming operational tasks of military 
or civilian value is also noteworthy. 
The civilian and military communica- 
tions satellites, the meteorological 
satellite program, the Vela nuclear 
test ban monitoring satellites, and 
the Transit navigation satellites aro 
significant examples of what has been 
accomplished. 

At least some of these systems 
compete with earthbound systems 
which can perform similar tasks, and 
the progress and visibility of tHosa 
systems can be measured by dollars 
and cents comparisons with their 
earthbound competitors. That the out- 
look for those systems is bright Is 
indeed a good indication that space 
technology has come of age, 

The series of unmanned satellites 
for exploration of the solar system. 
Ranger, Surveyor, Lunar OrbUer, 
have also reached a stage of perform- 
ance which illustrates how much 
progress has been made in space tech- 



28 



November 1966 



nology. The essence of what has been 
demonstrated is that, by adequate en- 
gineering and planning, monitoring 
of the fabrication and assembly, and 
qualification and functional testing in 
realistic environments, it is possible 
to attain a high probability of suc- 
cess initially, and that this is the 
efficient and economic way to con- 
duct such programs. 

The main function of technical and 
program management is to relate 
what is technically achievable to the 
resource allocations, schedules and 
costs. While this is being done, there 
is often great impatience about the 
delay in initiating full blown devel- 
opment programs, but the experiences 
of the last ten years have clearly 
shown that starting a program hast- 
ily on an open-ended basis is not, in 
general, the short route to success. 

In all of what has been said, I have 
attempted to interrelate those things 
which mark a competent and effec- 
tive technology; the capability to 
plan and execute projects which in- 
volve the application of scientific and 
engineering knowledge to a specific 
practical objective with the minimum 
expenditure of resources which will 
accomplish the desired result. The de- 
gree to which programs can be 
planned and executed with regard to 
the minimum expenditure of resources 
depends, of course, on good manage- 
ment, It also depends on being able 
to assess from experience and by a 
judicious combination of analysis, 
simulation and tests, just what re- 
sources can be expected to produce 
given technical results; and to as- 
sess within rather narrow limits what 
confidence can be attached to such 
estimates. This is the mark of a tech- 
nology which can be said to have 
come of age, and it is this mark 
which space technology has now 
reached as a result of technical prog- 
ress and both technical and manage- 
ment experience in a wide variety of 
programs. 

I believe that emphasis on accom- 
plishment with minimum expenditure 
of resources will be increasingly im- 
portant in the future since it will de- 
termine in considerable measure both 
the scope and the rate of progress of 
our space effort. 

The reasons for this are clear. 
Where space systems compete with 
earth-bound systems, as is particu- 
larly true in progress aimed at sci- 
entific investigations and the explora- 



tion of space, the total amount which 
can be done is necessarily limited. I 
would like to clarify this last state- 
ment because it is so easily misunder- 
stood. 

The advance of space technology 
which we have witnessed in the past 
ten years is typical of a situation 
which has occurred in many other 
fields of scientific and technical re- 
search and development. Science and 
technology now offer us not only 
many alternative ways of performing 
many new tasks, potentially useful in 
either military or civilian applica- 
tions. It would be neither possible nor 
practicable to proceed on the full 
scale development of all systems 
which the technology makes possible. 

As you know, the Federal budget 
for research and development test 
and evaluation has experienced a 
steady and phenomenal growth over 
the past 25 years. Even expressed in 
percent of a growing gross national 
product, the Research, Development, 
Test and Evaluation ( RD TE ) 
budget has gone from seven-tenths 
percent in 1941 to almost three per- 
cent in 1965. Most recently, we have 
been through a period of highly ac- 
celerated growth, in which the initia- 
tion of a massive sp ace program 
added to a rising curve of cost for 
development and acquisition of bal- 
listic missiles, resulted in RDT&E 
growth rates in the neighborhood of 
20 percent per year. 

Some people have tended to think 
of this maximum achieved growth 
rate as now ordained to be the nat- 
ural order of things and destined to 
continue indefinitely. This trend, if 
it were to continue from the level of 
1964 for ten years, would result in a 
Federal RDT&E budget in excess of 
the total budget of today by that 
time. The need to make selections 
from among many technical possibil- 
ities and to control the cost of our 
research and development activities 
should not be regarded as a problem. 
The situation bespeaks a very healthy 
scientific and technical posture for 
the nation. Further, the fact that 
science and technology now offer us 
many more things to do than wo can 
possibly afford is hardly to be inter- 
preted as meaning that progress and 
growth is at an end or on a plateau; 
it does, however, point up the need 
for selectivity and a situation in 
which progress offering small benefit 
at high cost will not survive. 



The problem of mailing selections 
in research and development is, of 
course, to some degree a matter of 
speculation ; the speculation relates 
not merely to the probability of 
achieving success but also to achiev- 
ing that success at a reasonable cost 
in relation to the benefits to be ob- 
tained. Because we are now in many 
cases faced with programs whose 
estimated cost is of the order of one 
billion dollars, decisions and commit- 
ments cannot be made lightly. 

I have had officers and civilians 
who were concerned with aircraft de- 
velopment at Wright Field in the 
1930's point out to me that, as majors 
or civilian P4's, they were making 
without review decisions of the kind 
which now go up to the highest eche- 
lons of the Air Force and DOD. 

I am compelled to point out to 
them that in 1937 the Army Air 
Corps research and development 
budget was five million dollars and 
that, even allowing for the differences 
of bookkeeping and converting to 
equivalent 1966 dollars, they were 
making rather small commitments of 
national resources. Further, at the 
then prevailing cost levels, we could 
afford to pursue several alternatives 
in parallel so that no one program 
decision had as much impact as many 
of those we must make today. 

The need to make hard choices In 
the research and development pro- 
gram is, of course, perhaps the key 
problem in overall program manage- 
ment and we do seek nil the assistance 
we can get from people inside and 
outside the Government in assessing 
both the potentials and risks of vari- 
ous proposed programs. One com- 
monly used aid to management is the 
advisory committee, and we in the 
Air Force are most appreciative of 
the time and energy which many emi- 
nent and already overworked people 
put into their efforts in advising 
us. We also derive great benefits 
from the advice they give us, 

Nevertheless, advisory committees 
rarely can put their findings into an 
overall E&D program context they 
can indicate whether a given line of 
technical effort in a specific field is 
promising and make suggestions as 
to how specific programs should be 
planned and scheduled. This sort of 
report is extremely valuable and, in 
some areas, we could hardly proceed 
without such an evaluation, but gen- 
erally it does not in itself provide a 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



29 



sufficient basis for a decision to pro- 
ceed with any program, 

The situation was epitomized in 
Warren Weaver's essay, "The Report 
of the Special Committee." As many 
of you will recall, that standard re- 
port essentially concluded with five 
points: The scientific field, X, is 
of critical importance and it is es- 
sential that we deepen our knowledge 
in this area; the field X has been 
mcagerly supported in the past and 
there is every reason to believe that 
modest but substantial support (say 
20 times the present level) could 
promptly lead to results of the high- 
est significance. And so it goes on to 
the fifth conclusion which is that, al- 
though the committee deplores inter- 
national rivalry in science, it feels 
compelled to point out that the Rus- 
sians appear to be ahead of us in 
field X. This applies to any subject- 
geography or oceanography or arctic 
exploration or space it really doesn't 
matter, you fill in the subject. I am 
sure you have seen many such re- 
ports. 

In summary then, space technology 
has arrived at a point in its matura- 
tion where it is now possible to plan 
and execute a wide variety of pro- 
gram options with a reasonable de- 
gree of confidence as to attainment, 
schedule and cost. We must, however, 
increasingly turn our attention, as in 
other fields of engineering, to the 
economics of our programs; this, lest 
it surprise anyone, is a normal func- 
tion of the engineer. 

Sometimes it has been forgotten 
that advancements in technology can 
be used to reduce the cost of a pro- 
gram as well or better than it can be 
used to eke out the last iota of vehi- 
cle performance. With the basic space 
technology which we now have In 
hand, and its continuing growth 
based on specific program experience 
and the very considerable national ef- 
fort in research, exploratory and ad- 
vanced development which feeds the 
technology, we have the technical 
means for defining and achieving our 



Address by Capt. J. L, Howard, 
SC, USN, Dir. of Procurement, 
Office of the Asst, Secretary of the 
Navy (Installations & Logistics), at 
the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration Logistics Manage- 
ment Symposium, Huntsville, Ala., 
Sept. 13-14, 1966. 




Capt. J. L. Howard, SC, USN 

Contracting for 
Logistic Support 

In contemplating the subject of, 
contracting for logistic support, it is 
appropriate at the outset to look at 
a bit of history, review present 
trends in contracting in general, and 
put the support question in perspec- 
tive. 

History. 

Throughout the 19th Century, the 
Army and Navy relied very heavily 
on Government-owned manufacturing 
facilities for the production of its 
heavy weapon systems. The Navy had 
its shipyards and ordnance plants. 
The Army had its arsenals and ord- 
nance depots. 

The 20th Century brought the air- 
plane, and the airplane, in its turn, 
brought some new approaches to the 
production of major systems. 

Without going into the details of 
basic national policy decisions which 
were made in the 1920's, suffice to 
say that the idea of Government re- 
liance on private enterprise for the 
production of aircraft became well es- 
tablished between World War I and 
World War II. 

reliance matured, grew 
led, we saw also the leaps 
i in technological progress 
*vtth the 1940'a and 1950's. 



We are now in an era of tech- 
nological complexity that Involves the 
convergence of many divergent dis- 
ciplines in the production of operating 
hardware. Electronic sciences now 
have interfaces with powerplant dis- 
ciplines. These, in turn, hnvc bear- 
ings on the human sciences, and we 
see the need for concurrent efforts 
and trade-offs between tho various 
possibilities and limitations In chem- 
istry, metallurgy, biology and hosts 
of other lines of scientific nml engi- 
neering endeavor. 
Present Trends. 

The trends that began in tho 1920'E, 
i.e., reliance on industry anil the 
growing complexity of technology, ore 
continuing today. 

In the field of Government con- 
tracting, the trends are keeping paco, 
both in complexity and in fieoHng to 
strengthen the economic basis on 
which tho United States hna bneonie 
prosperous and powerful. 

Specifically, the trend in DOD pro- 
curement policy is to stimulate com- 
petition among private Industrial 
complexes, and to shift the burdens 
of risk to tho private sector of the 
economy. 

More specifically, the Navy todny 
has an expressed policy, issued by 
Secretary Nitze, that seeks not only 
to intensify competitive effort nmong 
Navy suppliers but, equally impor- 
tant, to assure that the benefits or 
competition ho kept inviolnto through 
a policy of "hands off" during the 
contractor's performance of tho con- 
tract. 

Along with this expressed policy is 
the move toward more specific deter- 
mination of the perfoi-mnnce, quality 
and! reliability we want in our hard- 
ware, and less dependence on detailed 
blueprints, drawings and design spec- 
ifications. 

Compare, for example, the Navy's 
traditional approach to 01x11131100 pro- 
duction and shipbuilding. In these 
areas wo have for decades been tho 
recognized experts. We could con- 
ceive, create, design, develop and 
build naval guns and ships. We liadj 
and still have, a womb-to-tomb capa- 
bility, including a capability for sup- 
port. 

We have never had this In the 
same degree in aeronautics. Wa have 
acknowledged experts in aircraft and 
powerplant design. But generally, we 
have for years relied very heavily on 
the initiative, impetus and imagina- 
tion of industry. 



November 1964 



In aeronautics we have stated, in 
terms of performance, quality and 
reliability, what we want the airplane 
to do, where it is to fit in a carrier 
configuration, and how it should op- 
erate at sea. But we have left most 
of the graphic details to industry. 

We are beginning to apply that 
philosophy in other fields as well. The 
Faat Deployment Logistics Ship 
(PDL) project is a case in point. The 
same is true in certain missiles, tor- 
pedoes and communications equip- 
ments. 

We are saying, in effect, that we 
will specify to industry what we want 
the system to do, and it is our inten- 
tion to draw on industry's imagina- 
tion and profit motive to do the rest. 

There are a number of illustra- 
tions of these trends in action. We 
arc driving hard to reduce the use 
of Coat-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) con- 
tracts and shift to incentive types 
and fixed prices. Those place the bur- 
dens of economic risk on the con- 
tractors. 

We are using weighted guidelines 
which have specific factors for com- 
pany contribution, company risk, etc. 

We are moving in the direction of 
total procurement in which the Air 
Force has been a pioneer. 

Perspective. 

Now, to put these things in per- 
spective, it is important to look at 
this question of risk. 

The risk to a contractor in a fixed- 
price contract, or in incentive-typo 
contractscost or fixed price is 
clear. It is primarily a matter of 
economic risk. The survival of the 
company is at stake if it overruns its 
costs to such an extent that it folds. 

There are risks to the Government 
as well. The risk, from the Govern- 
ment's standpoint, is in failing to get 
either what it wanted or when it 
needed the item. This is particularly 
critical in the military fields. 

This means, therefore, that the con- 
tract must be a finely balanced in- 
strument that contains the right 
amount of risk for the company, and 
tho right amount of incentive re- 
ward, to give tho company the neces- 
sary motivation to succeed in per- 
forming the contract. We do not want 
to drive any company out of busi- 
ness. That is not in our interest what- 
soever. This is why, from our stand- 
point, the penalties for degrees of 
shortfall must be reasonable. 



On the other hand, the penalties 
for shortfall must be stringent 
enough to hurt. And the incentives 
for success must be worth the effort 
to gain the rewards. 

While we consider these factors, 
however, the Government must also 
have a contract that gives it reason- 
able confidence that the right quality 
will be delivered on time at reason- 
able cost. 

The achievement of such delicately 
balanced contractual instruments is 
most difficult. In reviewing most of 
the contracts we have today, one 
might question whether we have yet 
achieved the perfect balance desired. 

Now, the perspective required here 
is that we have been discussing the 
problem of development and produc- 
tion. Following these things is the 
problem of support continuing sup- 
port. 

Clearly, in the area of major 
weapon systems, we are always in a 
state of calculated risk. We assess 
the threats at sea, in the air, below 
the sea, in space and on land. We 
determine what we need to meet those 
threats. And we designate the time 
frame within which, or the time by 
which, we need the capability re- 
quired. 

If we do not make it, the threat is 
magnified. Think back to Sputnik and 
remember the pressures we were all 
under in those months following that 
turn of events. 

Now, when we do, In fact, have a 
hardware capability in the hands of 
the men who must use them, and we 
have the trained men, the vehicles, 
and all it takes to operate the weapon 
systems, the question of support be- 
comes absolutely critical. 

Awesome though it is to contem- 
plate that a hardware capability 
might not be at hand when we need 
it, it is equally critical that we have 
assured and continuing support for 
those weapons that are at hand. 
The Problem. 

The problem in the area of sup- 
port, therefore, is in getting abso- 
lutely certain support. There can be 
no if's or but's about it, We must. 

The problem is to structure con- 
tracts so carefully as to provide air- 
tight response. If we do not get the 
material we need in support, we can 
lose skirmishes, battles and wars. We 
can penalize the contractor under the 
contract, but this would be small pen- 
alty compared with being loser In 
war. 



In the Services, of course, we meet 
this problem by building up our own 
in-house capabilities for supply and 
maintenance support, complete with 
overhaul depots, repair facilities, sup- 
ply installations, stock levels of sup- 
plies and war reserves. 

Of course, we do, in fact, rely on 
commercial suppliers for a lot of 
these things, too. We send many 
equipments back to commercial plants 
for rework, overhaul and modification. 
We use basic ordering agreements 
and indefinite quantity contracts for 
parts support in the expectation that 
the moment we order something it 
will be forthcoming immediately. 

But generally, the theory has been 
that operational support must be a 
matter of command, not contract. 
This is why we have depots and over- 
haul shops as organic parts of the 
Military Services. 

This does not mean, however, that 
we cannot rely on industry for sup- 
port. On the contrary, we can and 
do. And, as we have seen in major 
end-item production, the trend is defi- 
nitely toward more of the same in 
the support area. 

We are using contractors more and 
more these days to man our missile 
ranges and advance bases. 

We are using contractors for cer- 
tain support services, e.g., data col- 
lection and processing services. 

We use contractors, aa indicated, 
for overhaul, for on-the-spot supply, 
etc. 

But the problem remains one of 
structuring contracts so carefully as 
to provide assured support, on time, 
at reasonable cost. 

With the shift from CPFF con- 
tracting, the demand upon us for 
finely structured contracts is greater 
than ever before. We shift the eco- 
nomic risks to our contractors, but 
we assume a greater response risk 
on the Government's side because the 
higher order contracts carry the 
strong implication of hands off. 

We cannot, for example, pump in 
more money just to give the contrac- 
tor more people and facilities to make 
him more responsive. These actions 
are not in keeping with the purpose 
of incentive and fixed-price contracts. 

We are, nevertheless, moving grad- 
ually to greater reliance on contrac- 
tors in certain of these support areas. 
The total package concept is one 
example. The newly evolved concepts 

(Continued on page 41) 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



31 



High Level Study Group 

Reviews Expansion of 

Industrial College Program 



The Commandant of the Industrial 
College of the Armed Forces (ICAF), 
capstone of the military educational 
system in the management of national 
security resources, has been directed 
by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to review 
the desirability of broadening ICAF 
participation in management educa- 
tion and related activities within 
DOD. 

Lieutenant General August Schom- 
burg, USA, who has served as Com- 
mandant of the Industrial College 
since April 1964, will head the study 
group. He will be assisted by Major 
General Jerry D. Page, Commandant, 
Air War College, Maxwell AFE, 
Ala. ; Major General Eugene A. 
Salet, Commandant, Army War Col- 
lege, Carlisle Barracks, Pa.; and Rear 
Admiral Frederick H, Schneider, Jr., 
Chief of Staff, U. S. Naval War Col- 
lege, Newport, E.I. 

Objective of the study is to deter- 
mine whether or not it is feasible and 
desirable for the Industrial College 
to assume functions in management 
education and training that extend 
beyond Its current mission. The col- 
lege is also directed by the Joint 
Chiefs to consider alternate methods. 
The study pertains to administrative 



management of resources, as distin- 
guished from military management 
of combat forces. Findings are to be 
reported by the end of the year. 

Areas being studied include re- 
search and dissemination of informa- 
tion on the latest developments in 
management practices; seminars to 
be conducted at local levels to improve 
communications with mid- and top 
management; and a highly profes- 
sional and scholarly journal which 
would serve to encourage original con- 
tributions and provide a mechanism 
for improving communications con- 
cerning management. 

The project has been named the 
Management Education and Training 
(MET) Study. 

Colonel Peter P. Dawson, USAF, 
director of the college's Office of 
Academic Plans and Research, is in 
charge of planning and research 
phases of the study, 

A working group of some 16 mem- 
bers will assist in the study. Plan- 
ning, research and administrative as- 
pects are being handled by Industrial 
College staff and faculty members, 
augmented by representatives of the 
Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine 
Corps assigned to the college on tem- 
porary duty. 



Powerful Continuous-Beam 

Gas Laser at Work in 

USAF Lab 



A continuous-beam gas laser which 
produces an invisible infrared beam 
from electrom ague tic ally- stimulated 
carbon dioxide, powerful enough 
to burn through a high-grade fire- 
brick in flve seconds, is now in opera- 
tion at the Air Force Weapons Labo- 
ratory, Kirtland AFB, N.M. 

Said to be the most powerful con- 
tinuous-beam laser in the world, the 
laboratory's Effects Branch is using 
the 600-watt infrared output to study 
interactions of the laser beam with 
various materials. The laser has 
proven an excellent device for focus- 
ing controlled amounts of energy upon 
target materials. 

As Is characteristic of lasers, there 
is no heat in the beam of light pro- 
jected. The heat is generated in the 
target material as the light is ab- 
sorbed. 

The device consists basically ot a 
double-walled glass tube 44 feet long. 
The inner portion of the tube is filled 
with & mixture of carbon dioxide, 
nitrogen and helium, The outer sec- 
tion is filled with water which circu- 
lates constantly through a heat ex- 
changer, cooling the laser tube. 



When operating, the gas mixture is 
fed constantly into the system, with 
the used gas passing through an ex- 
haust system into the air outside the 
building, This eliminates any possible 
carbon monoxide hazard. 

At one end of the tube is a gold- 
plated mirror which reflects light 
back into the gas mixture. As the 
laser action takes place, the beam is 
emitted through a window made of 
salt in the opposite end of the tube. 

The salt window, a single sodium 
chloride crystal two and one-half 
inches in diameter, absorbs none of 
the energy of the beam, and reflects 
about eight percent of the energy 
back into the tube to keep the las- 
ing action in progress. Target mate- 
rial is placed in a carefully shielded 
area near the salt window. 

The salt crystal is a limiting fac- 
tor in the amount of time the laser 
can be operated at full power, for it 
requires replacing after about two 
hours of continuous use. Also, like 
common table salt, the crystal absorbs 
moisture from the air. This moisture 
eventually causes the crystal to turn 
cloudy, again necessitating its re- 
placement. 



Army Engineers 

Award Contract To 

Study Reactor Concept 

A feasibility study of the Terres- 
trial Unattended Reactor Power Sys- 
tem (TURPS), an advanced mobile 
nuclear reactor concept designed to 
fill a large number of electric power 
requirements of the Armed Forces, 
will be conducted by the Martin-Mnri- 
etta Corp., Nuclear Division, under a 
contract from the U.S. Army Corps 
of Engineers. 

Work under the nine-month, 286,- 
898 contract will be directed by tho 
newly formed Research and Technol- 
ogy Department of the Nuclear Power 
Field Office (NPFO), a Corp of Engi- 
neers' agency at Fort Belvoir, Va. 

The study follows a conceptual de- 
sign by the Martin Co. for the U.S. 
Air Force of a 100-kilowattj direct 
conversion reactor power system that 
would operate unattended without re- 
fueling for flve years. 

Proposed as a power source for re- 
mote installations such as radar sites 
around the world, the majority of 
which are powered by diesel genera- 
tors requiring frequent servicing, tha 
TURPS power plant employs a new 
development in the state of the art 
of nuclear reactor control which 
eliminates the need for mechanically 
operated control rods. Control of the 
reactor is accomplished solely through 
the migration of hydrogen into and 
out of the fuel element from a reser- 
voir at the bottom of the fuel clement. 

The extremely mobile unit can be 
disassembled into two parts and easily 
shipped by conventional cargo air- 
craft or trailer truck. The plant is 
designed for field installation using 
standard military equipment, and > is 
capable of being placed in operation 
in about seven hours. 



Navy Accepts 
A-7A Corsair II 

The U.S. Navy formally accepted 
the A-7A Corsair II light attack 
bomber during ceremonies at Cecil 
Field, Fla., on Oct. 14. The first two 
A-7A's were accepted by the Com- 
mander, Naval Air Force, U.S. At- 
lantic Fleet, and will be incorporated 
into Fighter Squadron 174 for tram- 
ing at Cecil Field. 

Delivery of the Corsair II, an air- 
craft especially designed to carry out 
the attack and close support role, 
came only 18 months after the air- 
craft's initial flight on Sept. 27, 106G. 

The Navy will conduct A-7A car- 
rier suitability tests at sea during 
November and December 1966 and 
is proceeding with on-schedule fleet 
deliveries. 

The A-7A is produced by Ling- 
Temco-Vought, Inc., Dallas, Tex, 



32 



November 1966 




By 

Milton E. Jones 



Fortunately or unfortunately, we 
arc all creatures of habit, but habits 
can be broken by open minds, Judge 
Wyzanski put it quite concisely when 
he said, "One of the dangers of ex- 
traordinary experience is that those 
who have it may fall into the grooves 
created by their own expertness. 
They refuse to believe the hurdles, 
which they have learned from ex- 
perience are insurmountable, can in 
fact be overcome by fresh, independ- 
ent minds." 

Because of wars and national 
emergencies, negotiation of defense 
contracts became a habit. 

During the first World War, 
negotiated cost-plus-a-percentage-of- 
cost contracts were popular, especial- 
ly with contractors. 

I During World War II and sub- 
: Boquently, the negotiated cost-plus-a- 
\ fixed-fee (CPFF) type of contract 
: was popular. At least, this method 
\ of procurement limited the fee but 
| It did not preclude the incurrence 
of costs which under more advanced 
types of contracts would have been 
avoided. In some instances, cost-typo 
contracts have facilitated corporate 
expansion largely at Government ex- 
pense, 

Prior to the Korean Conflict, the 
Armed Services Procurement Act, 
Public Law 413, was passed. Its 
Implementation began in 1948. This 
j law was and is a good law. It was 
' conceived by some of the most dedi- 
| cated and knowledgeable people in 
; the Congress and in the Armed Serv- 
ices. Ita fundamentals are based 
i upon decades of experience. It ia a 
: law which recognizes the facts of 
i procurement life in the Armed Serv- 
j ices. Although Public Law 413 states 
i that ". . . All purchases and contracts 
I for supplies and services shall be 
made by advertising, . . ." it author- 
izes exceptions which give the most 
practicable flexibility to the negotia- 
tion of contracts under stated or 
justified circumstances. The Armed 
Services could hardly have asked for 
a law with greater flexibility. It is 
interesting to note that, although 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



minor revisions have been made to 
the law, its basic concepts remain 
unchanged. 

Before a great deal of precedent 
had been set in the implementation 
of the Armed Services Procurement 
Act, our nation was faced with the 
Korean Conflict. President Trum an 
declared a National Emergency in 
December 1950 and, as a result, 
exception (1) of the Act was invoiced. 
This exception authorized negotiation 
if ". . . determined to be necessary 
in the public interest during the 
period of a National Emergency 
declared by the President or by the 
Congress." For approximately the 
next five years, negotiation was the 
order of the day, In most major 
procurement organizations, formally 
advertised procurement became a lost 
art. During the early part of the 
Korean Conflict, our primary goal 
was to place orders and flll the ca- 
pacity of those companies capable of 
meeting urgent requirements. Pricing 
was important but was appropriately 
secondary. Reliance was placed, to a 
large extent, upon CPFF contracts, 
or upon negotiated redeterminable 
price type contracts as a means of 




Milton E. Jones, Dep, Dir of the 
Procurement Div., Naval Material 
Command, is responsible for the deter- 
mination of procurement policies and 
methods followed throughout the Navy. 
He has been actively associated with 
Government procurement operations 
and related functions since 1935. 



permitting a "second look" in an 
effort to avoid exorbitant profits. 
Advertised procurement was consid- 
ered much too inflexible and time 
consuming during this period. 

As the Korean situation stabilized, 
there was a recognition of the need 
for laying plans to return to a more 
normal peacetime procurement at- 
mosphere. In 1955, the Navy on its 
own began the justification of nego- 
tiation on a case-by-case basis and 
discontinued the general use of the 
blanket emei-gency exception. Some 
operating personnel opposed this ac- 
tion as additional effort which was 
both unnecessary and nonproductive. 
The convenient use of blanket nego- 
tiation under the emergency exception 
had become a habit. Nevertheless, in 
1956, the use of blanket negotiation 
under exception (1) of the Armed 
Services Procurement Act was ef- 
fectively discontinued throughout 
DOD. It became necessary to justify 
negotiation on a case-by-case basis in 
accordance with the applicable ex- 
ception to the use of formal adver- 
tising. Although there was some 
reemphasis on the use of formal 
advertising, major emphasis was 
placed upon precise justification of 
authority to negotiate under the var- 
ious exceptions of the law. Negotia- 
tion was still a habit. 

Beginning in 1961, the Pentagon 
took a new look at defense procure- 
ment methods. Steps were taken 
progressively to increase competitive 
procurement, promdte the use of fixed 
price and incentive contracts, reduce 
the uso of CPFF contracts to a mini- 
mum, avoid the use of letter contracts 
to the extent practicable, and Increase 
the use of formal advertising. Al- 
though the pattern wns not always 
clear, it was made patently evident 
by DOD management that "business 
as usual" was no longer acceptable. 

In 1962, Public Law 87-G58 (the 
"Truth in Negotiation" law) amended 
Subsection 2304(a) of Title 10 of 
the TJ. S. Code to read as follows: 
". , . Purchases of and contracts for 
property or services covered by this 
Chapter shall be made by formal 
advertising in all cases in which the 
use of such method is feasible and 
practicable under the existing con- 
ditions and circumstances," This re- 
vision was implemented in the Armed 
Services Procurement Regulation 
(ASPR) in such a manner as to make 
it clear that, even though technically 



33 



a particular procurement came with- 
in the meaning of a specific negotia- 
tion exception, formal advertising 
would be required if it were feasible 
and practicable under the circum- 
stances. The law and the regulation 
clarified the position of the Congress 
and gave renewed emphasis to pro- 
curement by formal advertising. 
Revitalization of formal advertising 
procedures was in progress. 

One of the great stumbling blocks 
to the increased use of formal ad- 
vertising has been the complex tech- 
nical nature of defense material and 
equipment and the lack of an ade- 
quate data package, which would 
indicate precisely what was required. 

During hearings in early 1957 
before the Subcommittee for Special 
Investigations, House Committee on 
Armed Services, the subcommittee 
suggested that the Armed Forces ac- 
complish certain procurements in two 
parts. The first part would solicit and 
evaluate technical proposals without 
reference to pricing, and the second 
part would solicit sealed bids under 
normal advertising procedures from 
only those firms having acceptable 
technical proposals. 

At the conclusion of the hearing, 
the Air Force agreed to test this 
procedure within the Air Materiel 
Command for a period of six months, 
At the end of these tests, the Air 
Force reported back to the committee 
that the use of the two-step pro- 
cedure, now known as Two-Step 
Formal Advertising;, had its draw- 
backs, but that the Air Force con- 
sidered its initial tests warranted 
further use of the technique. 

In November 1968, tho Chief of 
Naval Material authorized the Bureau 
of Aeronautics to conduct trial pro- 
curements utilizing 1 the two-phase 
formal advertising procedure. In July 
1959, after completion of its test, 
the Bureau of Aeronautics recom- 
mended adoption of the two-step 
formally advertised procedure. 

Original ASPR coverage was 
achieved in the summer of 1960. 



pected availability of adequate compe- 
tition both in the technical evaluation 
phase and in the pricing phase. 
Adequate competition may exist in 
any instance where there is more 
than one potential source. On the 
other hand, the existence of several 
sources may not of itself assure ade- 
quate competition. Reasonable judg- 
ment must be exercised, based upon 
the circumstances of each given case. 

Advertised procurement, two-step 
or otherwise, has been associated with 
items which are not of great com- 
plexity. However, the Navy procured 
its requirement for Tales missiles on 
a two-step, multi-year formally ad- 
vertised basis. This missile is indeed 
complex and for more than ten years 
had been procured from a sole source. 
Initially, there was substantial dif- 
ference of opinion in the Navy as to 
the propriety of using the two-step 
formally advertised procedure, It was 
only after the project manager had 
heard all sides that he decided to 
use the two-step approach. This par- 
ticular project manager accepted the 
fact that cost analysis and detailed 
negotiation of price were not essential 
and that his requirement could be 
satisfied effectively by two-step form- 
al advertising. He was convinced 
that this procedure was feasible and 
practicable. The award for the multi- 
year procurement was made at a unit 
price of approximately 58 percent of 
the previously negotiated unit price. 

The Navy considers this procure- 
ment to be a fine example of the 
practicability, feasibility and economy 
of using two-step formal advertising 
on a multi-year basis to procure a 
complex and technical item. 

Let us now touch upon another 
area where formal advertising is 
being expanded effectively. This area 
involves life cycle costing which is 
being given considerable emphasis 
throughout DOD. Because of the dif- 
ficulty in establishing criteria and 
the basis for evaluating these criteria, 
it may appear on the surface that the 



!* s-.vt.r3 M-un J-i rt n Vl ** 



Using and multi-year procurement, U 
indeed a feasible and practicable 
method of forcing the establiHlmnMit 
of precise and understandable cri- 
teria and of assuring positive unil 
uniform methods of evaluation, Of 
course, the same benefits accrue in 
this type of procurement an accrui; 
in similar negotiated procure iimnts 
with respect to increased competition 
generated by larg-er quantities pro- 
cluced over an extended pei-tod nf 
time and greater standardisation 
achieved by continuous production by 
the same source. 

Life cycle costing is designed to fdvo 
maximum value lor dollni'H 
The number of guaranteed 
hours, mean time between failures,, 
operability, maintainability nnil relia- 
bility are all significant UHpudH of 
the total cost of an item during Us 
useful life. Also, the introduction i>f 
a new item into the supply Hywlpm 
adds to the problems of supply. En- 
ventory, operations, mafntoniwn! find 
training, all of which should 1m tiitwn 
into consideration in evaluating tho 
net cost to the Government. 

As an example, the Navy hud 
procured for itself and tho Air FIHYO 
a sizeable quantity of 80 KVA 
Generator Systems and wan |m>|Hir- 
ing to make a further prinniromi'ut 
to meet additional raquh'ttmmilH. It 
was decided that competition w<iulil 
be obtained for the adclillcnuil re- 
quirements and that factom of wip- 
ply, maintenance ami rollnMllly 
would be taken into coimidrrutlon 
and evaluated in determining llio 
lowest net cost to the Govornmiuil. 

Two-step formal adverUahiff on n 
multi-year basis, plus ovaluiitcd wt 
cost to the Government, wan ohwn 
as the proper and moat offoctivo 
method of procurement. 

lAlthough the following in not ft 
precise comparison, because of (HftVr- 
ing quantities and delivery 
it will give a fair idea of llio 
which were obtained. 

The initial purchase of tlio .10 KVA 
Generator Systems was made chirliiK 
FY 1965 under a two-step, inulll- 
year formally advertised procure- 
ment. Two companies nubnilttetl 
technical proposals and bid on thfl 
second step. Award was made (or a 
single year to the low bidder nt fl 
price of $1,776.12 for tho Nnvji 
generator and $1,792.82 for llio All 
Force version. A single year uwttrd 
was made because prices quoted on 



November 



the multi-year basis were higher than 
Q single year basis. 

Later in the same year, the second 
procurement of the 30 KVA Genera- 
tor System s, which is the case in 
pointj was processed, as previously 
indicated, on a two-step, multi- 
year, evaluated-net-cost-to-the-Govern- 
ment basis. Technical proposals and 
bids were received from the same 
two companies which had submitted 
bids on the original procurement. 
Award on the multi-year (G years 
10(16-1970) was most economical. 
Company A (the current producer) 
bid o, unit price of $1,403.96 for the 
Navy version and $1,420.45 for the 
Air Force version. Company B bid 
n unit price of $1,683.00 for both. 
Considering 1 the factors to be eval- 
uated cost of preventative mainte- 
nance, overhaul costs, spare and re- 
pair parts, price of support equipment 
and transportation Company A's to- 
tal bid price was $4,154,237.84 and 
Company B, $4,963,267.82. Thus, 
Company A waa low on both an un- 
evuhiAted and evaluated basis. In 
this rather complex advertised pro- 
curement, technical and evaluation 
factors were ironed out in the first 
step so that, as designed, the second 
step was merely a pricing action. Al- 
though in days gone by, it is quite 
likely that the 30 KVA's would have 
been negotiated, by careful planning, 
sensible communication and precise 
preparation and understanding of the 
Invitation for Bid, formal advertising 
was "feasible and practicable." 

It ia also interesting to note that 
substantial procurements of war- 
ships ttre being made through the use 
of straight-formal advertising. Dur- 
ing PY 1965, 22 destroyer escorts, 
nuclear-powered attack submarines, 
threo guided missile destroyers and 
22 various other smaller craft were 
procured by formal advertising. 

From these examples, it is obvious 
that the use of formal advertising 
need not be restricted to standard, 
off-the-shelf, commercial-type items 
and that, when formal advertising is 
used in accordance with the two-step, 
multi-year and life cycle costing pro- 
cedures, it can. become a very useful 
tool In the procurement of some very 
complex defense items. 

It is important to note that it is 
usually less time consuming to solicit 
technical proposals under the two-step 
procedure, evaluate these proposals, 
solicit bids and make an award than 



it is to justify negotiation, solicit 
quotations, evaluate proposals, obtain 
cost breakdowns, perform audits, 
negotiate an acceptable contract 
which requires substantial review 
prior to award and, finally, make the 
award, 

We are all concerned with con- 
tractor's responsibility and there are 
certainly those who feel it is much 
easier to award to a responsible 
source through negotiation rather 
than by formal advertising. With re- 
spect to this "feeling" Secretary 
McNarnara, over two years ago, had 
this to say : 

". . . Full understanding of the 
importance of affirmatively deter- 
mining that the prospective con- 
tractor is responsible should as- 
sist our efforts to increase the 
use of formally advertised pro- 
curement. Use of negotiation is 
never justified by a fear that ad- 
vertising may lead to award to a 
contractor who is unlikely to per- 
form satisfactorily. The standards 
of responsibility for contractors 
are precisely the same for ad- 
vertised as for negotiated procure- 
ments. If a company would he 
rejected as not responsible, not- 
withstanding a low offer in a ne- 
gotiated procurement, the snme 
company should be rejected not- 
withstanding a low bid on an 
equivalent advertised procurement. 
The contracting officer has the 
same right and duty to determine 
nonresponsibility in one case as in 
the other." 

Determining responsibility of a 
source is not a matter related to the 
method of procurement but is a mat- 
ter related to facts and intestinal 
fortitude. 

In an effort to develop a full range 
of contracting ability, bring tech- 
nical and procurement personnel 
under the same command authority 
and, in so doing, to increase the use 
of formal advertising, the Commander 
of the Naval Material Command has 
directed the commanders of the 
Naval systems commands to be com- 
pletely responsible for those technical 
procurements which are under the con- 
trol of each respective command and 
which can bo handled through the 
formal advertising procedure. Cer- 
tainly, closer proximity and greater 
familiarity with formal advertising 
procedures should contribute to a sub- 
stantial increase in their use. 



Familiarity with formal adver- 
tising procedures and the wealth of 
General Accounting Office decisions 
which have resulted from its use 
should be an objective of industry as 
well as Government. Too frequently, 
industry is not responsive because of 
minor deficiencies and exceptions 
which could and would be avoided if 
the procedure was more comprehen- 
sively understood. 

Formal advertising requires precise 
delineation of the specific requirement 
and all of the terms and conditions 
attendant thereto. Where its use is 
practicable and feasible it has many 
benefits both to the buyer and seller. 

It .may be expected that with some 
introspection, imagination and down- 
right forceful effort, many instances 
may be found where, although nego- 
tiation can be justified, formal adver- 
tising may, in fact, be "feasible and 
practicable." 

New Lightweight 

Body Armor Provides 

Buoyancy in Water 

A combination body armor-life vest, 
which provides buoyancy in water as 
well as protection against explosive 
ordnance, has been developed by the 
Navy's Clothing and Textile Labora- 
tory at the Naval Supply Center, 
Bayonne, N.J., and is now being tested 
in Vietnam. 

The buoyant body armor weighs 
only 46 ounces, the same as a stand- 
ard Navy life preserver, Conventional 
body armor, made of several layers of 
canvas-like nylon fabric or rigid fiber 
glass plate, weighs more than eight 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Military and industrial traffic man- 
agers, who share a mutual concern for 
the hazards involved in the packing 
and shipping of dangerous materials, 
are becoming increasingly aware of 
the need to keep up to date on the 
best possible procedures as a result 
of expanding supply operations in 
Vietnam. 

Procedures requiring special care 
are only as good as the people who 
execute them, and those who deal with 
the shipment of dangerous materials 
need, in addition to a high sense of 
responsibility, a thorough knowledge 
of special procedures for packaging. 
A survey conducted by the Air 
Force revealed that during; calen- 
dar year 1964, the average monthly 
movement of dangerous materials by 
Air Force aircraft was 450 tons. The 
year of 1965 saw an increase In av- 
erage monthly tonnage to the 1,200- 
ton mark, and 19GG is expected to show 
an oven greater increase in dangerous 
materials tonnage. As tonnage in- 
creases, so does the number of Air 
Force flights carrying dangerous 
cargo, and in 1965 this figure had in- 
creased to 75 percent of all flights. 
Of course, a mere increase in ton- 
nage should not necessarily call for 
increased concern on the part of the 
Defense "Department. Additional ship- 
ments of dangerous materials, if prop- 
erly packaged, marked and handled, 
would not normally be any cause for 
increased concern. However, when in- 
creased shipments are coupled with 
ever increasing reports of improper 
shipments, it is easy to understand 
why so much attention ia now being 
paid to the subject. 

During a six-week period, the Mili- 
tary Airlift Command (MAG) re- 
ceived 438 reports of damaged or 
improper shipments, These reports 
were mainly baaed 1 on visual examina- 
tion of dangerous cargo exterior con- 
tainers, markings, labels and related 
documents* The shipments covered by 
these reports could not be airlifted. 
Additional time and materials were 
required to bring them up to stand- 
ard so that they could be shipped. 

Hazards involved in packaging, 
shipping, or storing dangerous mate- 
rials can affect property, but the pri- 
mary concern is the injury to person- 
nel which could occur if packing is 
not done properly, 

What are dangerous materials? 
The Interstate Commerce Commission 



36 




v 



By 

Charles P. Huttor 

Joint Military Packaging Training Center 
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md. 



(ICC), as well as other regulatory 
agencies, have provided a definite 
system of classifying and identifying 
dangerous materials. The classifica- 
tion indicated by ICC will bo consid- 
ered first, 

An explosive, for purpones of trans- 
portation, may be considered as any 
chemical compound or mixture, or de- 
vice containing such a compound or 
mixture, which is designed for, and 
capable of, functioning by explosion, 
i.e., with instantaneous release at pas 
or heat. Explosives aw subdivided 
into the following three categories: 

ClaHH A. Explosives which are 
considered most dangerous and which 
detonate, or In some other way In- 
volve a maximum ha/.ard. 

Class H. Explosives that aro lenn 
dangerous, and those which function 
generally by rapid combustion or de- 
flagrating. 

Class C. Explosives whieh are 
relatively soft. In general, Class C. 
explosives aro manufactured devices 
which contain relatively small amounts 
of either Class A or Class I! explo- 
sives, or both. 

Forbidden explosives aro those 
which aro too dangerous to bo trans- 
ported. 

A flammable liquid in tloBcrlbetl us 
any liquid that evolves flammable 
vapors in air at a temperature of 80 
P., or below, as determined by ft meth- 
od specified in ICC regulations. Tho 
vapors from such liquids, when mixed 
with air in certain proportions, will 
burn if Ignited. If this should occur in 
an inclosed space, the combustion of 
tho vapor-air mixture may bo BVifll- 
ciently vigorous to stimulate nn ox- 
plosion. 

Flammable solids include such ma- 
terials, other than explosives, which 
can ignite through friction, absorp- 
tion of moisture, spontaneous chemi- 
cal changes, or aa a result of retained 
heat from manufacturing or process- 
ing. 



Oxidi/ing materials include nil f'& 
stances, such as chlorates, iwnwii**, 
perchlorntcs, pormmigacintofl nnJ r.i- 
tratoH, that yield oxygon mulilj' t) 
stimulate combustion of organic nut- 
ter. 

Acids and corrosives are those a'ki- 
lino caustic liquids which, ii-htn. is 
contact witli living tissue, will ca'J^ 
(Hivovo damage of sucli tissue t? 
chemical action; or, in CHSO of lf^- 
ago, will materially daninge CT *.- 
slroy other lading by chemical acts "3 
or can causo fire when in contact w3& 
organic matter or with certain tk*~ 
Icals, ICC regulations authorize tJu 
types of lubnlfl for theso mMemla *) 
that any acid or eori'osive liquid, as 
ho identified appropriately, 

A compressed BUS is defined as *T.J 
material or mixture Jiavlnjj- In O.i 
container oithor mi absolute \>KKW 
exceeding 40 pounds per squire IK\ 
at 70"!' 1 ., or an absolute pressure 



at IIH)"1'\, or both; or my K\* 
flammable material having a F*'- 
vapor pressure exceed! MR -10 p-yjr-i 
per square inch absolute at IM'f 
Compressed ROWM am 
cither as flammable or no 
depending upon tho results of 
tcHtK prcRcribed in ICC Mguli. 
Poisonous articles we divided fc 
tho following four clasHS acecr^ 
to their characteristics: 

Class A. Extromcly danger 
poisonous gases or liquid*. A n 
small amount of the BUS or vapci 
tho liquid, when mixed ulth air, 
perilous to life. This (loss Ir.ttt: 
cHphoBffnno, lowlslto, mufltard g 
phoagflno and Blmllnr chemicals. 

Claas B. Leas danucnus po!&: 
liquids or solids, which nro hazard 
to health. Oral toxicily Idoiitlfles t! 
which produce death wlUitn 48 fe 
whon Inhnlod continuously f OT 
hour. Toxicity by Wn alstnf 
identifies those which produce A 
within 48 hours by wnltauoui 

November \ 



tact with bare akin for 24 hours or 



Class C. Tear gas or irritating 
substances. Liquid or solid substances 
which give off dangerous or irritating 
fumes when brought into contact with 
fire or when exposed to air. 

e Class D. Radioactive materials 
from which certain rays are emitted 
that may be hazardous. Radioactive 
materials emit one or more of four 
kinds of rays (gamma, alpha, beta, 
or neutrons). The dangerous emana- 
tion of alpha and betn rays can be 
stopped comparatively easily by 
efficient wood or fiber packaging. 
Those that radiate dangerous amounts 
of gamma rays must be protected 
by a special shield, usually made 
of lead. Neutron emanation requires 
very special protection. Class D 
poisons are further subdivided into 
three groups according to the type 
of radiation emitted. Group I mate- 
rials are those which emit any gamma 
radiation either alone, or with alpha 
or beta radiation. Group II materials 
emit neutrons and either or both of 
the types of radiation of Group I 
materials. Group III materials are 
those- which emit only electrically 
charged particles, i.e., alpha or beta 
radiation. 

The dangerous materials described 
above are those as classified by the 
Interstate Commerce Commission. In 
addition to those, the Coast Guard 
also regulates materials in two other 
categories. 

The Coast Guard also lists combusti- 
ble liquids as any liquids which give 
off flammable vapors at or below a 
temperature of 1BOF. or above 80F. 
Hazardous items Include any sub- 
stance which is liable to spontaneous 
heating in excess of 10"F. at or below 
temperatures of 212F., or liberates 
vapor susceptible to ignition by a 
spark or open flame at or below 
300F. 

In addition to the materials classi- 
fied by the ICC and the Coast Guard, 
commercial aircraft require the classi- 
fications of other restricted articles. 
These materials are described as those 
which are not entirely suitable for 
transportation by air without some 
precautionary packaging. They are 
divided into tho following throe cate- 
gories: 

Group A. Items not otherwise 
restricted which have noxious, toxic, 
or irritating characteristics that can 
cause extreme annoyance or discom- 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



fort to passengers and crew in the 
event of leakage in flight. 

Group B. Liquids only moderate- 
ly corrosive and solids which are 
strongly corrosive when they are wet. 

Group C. Etiologic agents and 
polymeraable materials. 

Now that dangerous materials have 
been described, at least generally, it 
is necessary that some of the more 
important documents and publications 
that regulate the packaging and ship- 
ment of such materials be studied. 

Interstate shipments, provided that 
an interstate carrier is not involved, 
are governed by state and local regu- 
lations. Interstate shipments of dan- 
gerous materials, as well as intrastate 
shipments on interstate carriers, are 
regulated by publications which are 
generally a part of the U.S. Code. 

For clarity, the various documents 
are indicated in two categories: 
storage documents and packaging and 
shipping documents. 

Storage Documents. 

Army Materiel Command Regula- 
tion 385-224, Air Force Manual 127- 
100, and Bureau of Naval Weapons 
Ordnance Pamphlet No. 5, Volume 1, 
deal essentially with the storage and 
processing of explosives. These docu- 
ments establish quantity-distance des- 
ignations (the weight limitation of a 
given explosive that may be stored 
within a given minimum distance 
from a railroad, building, magazine 
or other facility) and storage com- 
patibility designations. 

Tho amount of explosive material 
that can be assembled or packaged in 
a given facility may not depend on 
available equipment or floor space, but 
upon the quantity-distance class. Ex- 
pensive concrete walls, revetments, or 
additional facilities, not in the budget, 
may be required to meet processing 
schedules. 
Packaging and Shipment Documents. 

Air Force Manual 71-4, a joint 
service document, titled "Packaging 
and Handling of Dangerous Materials 
for Transportation by Military Air- 
craft," includes a listing of danger- 
ous materials most likely to be within 
the military supply system, an indi- 
cation of their acceptability for air 
shipment, hazardous properties of 
each material, storage and handling 
data and packaging and marking in- 
formation. 

The Official Air Transport Re- 
stricted Articles Tariff No. 6-3 is a 



publication relating to the packaging 
and shipment of restricted articles 
and is published by an agent for the 
participating carriers. The tariff con- 
tains restrictions which determine 
whether a particular article will be 
accepted for transportation and speci- 
fies packaging requirements for these 
items. 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regula- 
tions, Part 49, provides statutory re- 
quirements of the Federal Aviation 
Agency. 

Documentation pertaining to the 
packaging and shipment of dangerous 
materials by water is contained in the 
following regulations: 

Agent T, C. George's Water Car- 
rier Tariff No. 16 is a publication 
issued by an agent for the water 
carriers and indicates the condition 
under which the water carriers will 
accept dangerous materials for ship- 
ment. The document is, in effect, a 
transcription of the U.S. Coast Guard 
Regulations, with minor additions 
such as the listing of participating 
carriers. 

The basic legal document governing 
the transporting of dangerous mate- 
rials aboard vessels is Title 46, Code 
of Federal Regulations, Parts 146 to 
149. This document indicates Coast 
Guard regulations and, as such, is 
essentially the same as T. C. George's 
Water Carrier Tariff No. 16. 

CG 108, Rules and Regulations for 
Military Explosives and Hazardous 
Munitions, is a publication of the 
Coast Guard and contains excerpts 
from Coast Guard Regulations (Title 
46 CFR Part 146). 

Surface documents, or those docu- 
ments which govern shipment of dan- 
gerous materials by truck, express, 
railway and inland waterways not 
under Coast Guard jurisdiction, are 
as follows : 

Agent T, C. George's Tariff No. 15, 
which published the ICC regulations, 
contains, in addition to other mate- 
rials, a list of explosives and other 
dangerous articles by commodity 
groupings, together with shipping 
descriptions, packing, marking and 
labeling requirements, and shipper's 
certificate of compliance to the regu- 
lations. Tariff No. 15 is divided into 
eight different parts, each part gen- 
erally pertaining to a different group 
of carriers and shippers. Of particu- 
lar note are the shipping container 
specifications included in this publi- 



37 



ciition. Thfi document, ptihliulu'd by 
lho Hinviui of Mx])lnivi','i l isi (In* moiil 
H])-l()-diili! pulilinitimi in the I1<'ld mid 
[ihmild lie cmmidiTi'd Itit- Iwsir pub 
liration for pacltajimir mid n 



List of BDSA Regulations, 
Orders and Related Actions 



(An of Od, 11, ItMlli) 



ii'lp lit ilfli'i 1 
iiliippiiiK I''' 



In this Motor dnrricrH 1 /<,V;thijiii'ni 
nwl IhtniicrtiiiH Arlh'li'a Tariff A'n. //, 
Hid Aini'nVmi Trucluniv Aiiimriiilwrw, 
lilt 1 ., ill iidinK "'' K<'nl for tho motor 
din-lorn and jmbliiilu'ti Iho !('(! n'i;ii 
liitiomi, (!tml.imln of tliin InrifV urn 
(\Hucntlully the imnu 1 an piililinhi'd in 
Tin-Ill' No. Hi. 

7'(//it /,!>, f'Wr / /'Yi/nW liffiitlu' 
liotiu, I'ui'lit 7l-?!>, In Uio himlr li'Kiil 
doi'-titm-nt containing Ilii* rulcti mid 
rr'H'iilnlioni! of tin 1 !(!(!. The di'iu'i'lp- 
linn proviouiily iruliciid'tl fur (ioni'iv' 1 " 
Tnrlir No. Hi In nlim miiliilili' In Hit* 
oonl<'iibioM!><:i''U'n --7I). 

Ollii't 1 (Itii-nniMitii of 
niinliiK 1'in'ltnftlnir iMut 
([ulri'itii'iilii fur di 
an' lho littri'int (/ /'.V/i/o.'iiV 
;j/i/c/,'i <!, HA, t!(' nmt '}, Tlir 
nii'titfi pruvldit H'f'iicrnl hui 
mill hiniliiiK itnil Imu'lnit 
for oxiitniiivi'H In tnn'tiii and rail i-ani, 
In iiildllion In thi'iif jmiiiphlitn ( nhip- 
peril nhoiili! ht< fully uwinv nt np|ii'<i 
]>rliil(t lonil and iilntti ri'ijiilrriiii'itt!! 
I'l^ui'dinji' tlii 1 |NU'luij[iiiK mnl nliipnii'iil 
of danK<'i'oiiii iniitiii'lalii. In iiiiiuy 
ciitu'ii, tilnlc mul liH'iil ifovi'i'tinn'iil ss 
Hpcrlfy coinpllmii'o with I he I't-iinirc 
mcnlH of lln- !<!<!. 

lion'l, KUitHM or Iniiit imrkanliiK n*- 
i|uh'|ti)H'iilH fin' ilaiiKnrniiii nmti'i'inln 
to nicniiiry. l'fti> I he ri'HiihUloim I hut, 
i-xliit, and lin iivii'n thul yiiiir ii|ii|inn i nl, 
\vlll nut en line ilcntli ur injury tu 
jioini'inie, or thul you will mil lie mill- 
jccl (o lino uv iniprlii'iiitneiit. 

Tlioiio of you who m conrt'i'iM-il 
with tho parluiKltiK mid nli[|iini')it uf 
(ItuiKitnitiii niiilorlalu nhmihl add onu 
flruil lu'occilun 1 to your iiliimliu'd way 
of doliiK Imnliii'iui. Your llnal m-t, 
pl'liir to nlll|i|)inK diiliKi'i'dUii iiiuti 1 - 
rlaln, nhmild lie to auk yoiiniclf, "Do 
I wtint lhin jiiickiiK' 1 Intiiitimvlcd 
my coiiiiiiiinlly tir pm.t my 



NOTICE 




!, ( ,f IVrvlmiH Actions, 

-i ( ,r t)n> I' 



IHr, 7 (Juiif l!!i, IMMi) I.i Kr,r. :', 

Plr. 7, Atiii'iidtui'iit 1 (May ;, UH.H) tu 



IIUSA lii-K, 1. (tin iiim-iiiUI tl.'t. II, HIM) 

lUtSA IJi'K. I! (Ntiv. !.. 1J)M| 

tiiniA it.-it. v (Apr. ;::i, nii.;) 

HllSA Itt'K. H (Mity 1!., ISKiii) 



MMUHMII-I ,,f 1 1,,. I'rlorlllri) n 

All- >!:*( lunit .'iyiili'iiui hiitwiili 

r^iia.lii tind I'nitfil HtutoH, 



pi, liiiii.tni uf HIISA (for- 
nml 




o I he, \\w 
of Xlp t'odcH hi ninlllnir Hit- Detentm 
Infantry ItitUvtln (o ihiltvd Hltitcit 
HiiliHci'lhcrH. PloiiHv include your '/I|i 
Code when reqi 
of (he Ilitttvlin, 



M 1A (Muy M, ni.:it 

Aiin'iiiliiH'iil I (.Imtn ',|ii. I'jiMf) i-i M IA. 

Aini'Hiitili'lil ,'l lrt. 7, 1!'(V1} t.i M IA. 

AtitKiiiliiinil -i (Jim, '.!U. lii.Vi) t-. M IA. 

nir. I |Mrl. ill, I'.D.ii) lu M IA. 

IMi'. I, Aiii'-iolini-til 1 (N..v. IV, IfiMM 
to M I A. 

M HI (.Iinni '.!!!, l!i;;tU 
Anii'iiiliiii-iil I (Ann- i'/, llittil) i-i M 111, 
Anii'iidfiionl '.t (Jim. ;!U, it,'<K| t*< M 111, 

M ItA (May C>, HIM!) 

Aiiii'iidiiit-iit ;! (Jiut. lilt, Ht.Vi) (* M ;.A. 

M MA (an uiii"iidnl Ht'i-, IK, iU),rtj 
Aiiifiulini'fil I (Jan. ;:ti, i!i:,Hj (-1 M MA. 

hi M MA. 

Illi'. 1 (Nov. in, HUIM I" M MA. 
IHr. a O'Vli. till, Ulftfl) t.! M MA. 
nir. i!, Aiiiciulhifiil li (Aiiir. Hi, lOflfl) 

In M MA. 

M 17 (H umt'ritH Mf|U. 4, ItiriU) 
M 'i! (titi Hitirnilftl Mny 'M, ItNWl 
M <II!A (Miiy (1, lilfilt) 



tuid 



Alloyi. 



Klvtr,mJf 



or PnrU, 



38 



mttrurUh Mnehlnwy; 
Kudurt. 



Novmbr 



Delegations 
Del. 1 (as amended May 31, I960) ------ Delegation of Authority to 

, / , , Secretary of Defense. 

Del. 2 (as amended May 31, 1960) -------- Delegation of Authority to 

,/* o i**n* Atomic Energy Commission. 

Del. 8 (May 8, 1963) -------------------- Delegation of Authority to Ad- 

TM /r- i or ior-i* mmistrator of General Services. 

Del. 9 (Feb. 26, 1961) ------------------- Secretary of Interior Delegation 

of Authority with Respect to 
Certain Industrial Chemicals 
Used Principally in the Petro- 
leum Industry. 

Del. 10 (Apr. 26, 1951) ------------------ Administrator of Production and 

Marketing Administration Del- 
egation of Authority to Exer- 
cise Certain Functions. 

Del ' 1 (a8 amended March Emergency Delegation of Prior- 

and Allocation Powers. 



Notice 

Notice 2 (ns amended Mar. 1, 1954) ---- Signature of Official BDSA 
Reporting Del. 2 (Oct. 11, 1966. Actions. 



DEFENSE PRIME CONTRACT AWARDS 
TO SMALL BUSINESS 



Procurement from All Firms 

Procurement from Small Business Firms 
Percent Small Business , 



(Amounts in Thousands) 

July-Aug, 1966 July-Aug. 1965 

$6,778,000 $4,867,600 
1,406,800 972,800 

20.8 20.0 




DESTINED FOR DESTRUCTION, a Fireflsh target boat drifts calmly off the 
coast of Southern California. The radio-controlled target system, ordered into 
production In 1064 after U. S. ships were attacked by surface craft in the Gulf 
of Tonkin, is used by the Navy to simulate enemy PT-boats during fleet gun- 
nery exercises. The Firefish is 17 feet long and is built of reinforced fiberglass. 
It has a 120-horsepower inboard engine, can make speeds up to 30 knots and 
it can be controlled by surface vessels or aircraft. 



Boeing Selected 
To Develop and 
Produce SRAM 

The Boeing Co., Seattle, Wash., has 
been selected by the Air Force to de- 
velop and produce the AGM-60A 
fahort Range Attack Missile (SRAM). 
It will be acquired under the Total 
Package Procurement Concept which 
calls for all development and pro- 
duction options to be procured in one 
contractual package. 

The AGM-69A, an air-to-surface 
missile, will provide aircraft with the 
stand-off capability to attack heavily 
defended targets. It will be carried 
by the FB-111 bomber and will be 
adaptable to late model B-52 bombers. 

The Boeing Co., under this firm 
fixed price incentive contract, will 
complete the development of SRAM 
at a target price of $142.3 million. 
The target price for the approved 
production quantity is $93.5 million. 

The AGM-69A System Program 
Office of the Air Force System Com- 
mand's Aeronautical Systems Divi- 
sion, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 
will manage development and pro- 
curement of the weapon system. 



USAF Awards 

Contract for A-7D 

Attack Aircraft 

The Air Force will begin procur 
ment of the A~7D Corsair II attac 
aircraft under a $19,147,000 lettei 
contract awarded Oct. 31 to LTV 
Aerospace Corp., Dallas, Tex. The 
A-7D is the Air Force version of the 
Navy A-7A. 

First delivery of production air- 
craft will be in 1968, with the first 
wing scheduled to be operational in 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



U.S. Department of Commerce Field Offices 



Albuquerque, N, M. 87101 
U. S. Courthouse 
Phone: Area Code 505, 247-0311 
Anchorage, Alaska 99501 
306 Loussac Sogn Building 
Phone: Area Code 907, 272-6331 
Atlanta, Ga. 30303 
4th Floor, Home Savings Building 
75 Forsyth St., N.W. 
Phone: Area Code 404, 626-6000 
Baltimore, Md. 21202 
305 U.S. Customhouse 
Gay find Lombard Streets 
Phone: Area Code 301, Plaza 2-8460 
Birmingham, Ala. 35205 

Suite 200-201, 908 South 20th St. 
Phone: Area Code 205, 326-3327 
Boston, Mass. 02203 

Room 510, John Fitzgerald Kennedy 
Federal Building 
Phone: Area Code 617, CA 3-2312 
Buffalo, N. Y. 14203 
604 Federal Building 
117 Ellicott St. 

Phone: Area Code 716, 842-3208 
Charleston, S. C. 29403 
Federal Building Suite 631 
334 Meeting St. 

Phone: Area Code 80S, 747-4171 
Charleston, W. Va. 25301 
3002 New Federal Office Buildinjr 
500 Quarrier St. 
Phone: Area Code 304, 343-6196 
Cheyenne, Wyo. 82001 
6022 Federal Building 
2120 Capitol Ave. 
Phone: Area Code 307, 634-5920 
Chicago, 111. 60604 
1486 New Federal Building 
219 South Dearborn St. 
Phone: Area Code 312, 828-4400 
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 
8028 Federal Office Buildine 
660 Main St. 

Phone: Area Code 513, 684-2944 
Cleveland, Ohio 44101 
4th Floor, 

Federal Reserve Bank Building 
East 6th St., and Superior Ave. 
-fnone: Area Code 216, 241-7900 
Dallas, Tex. 75202 
Room 1200, 1114 Commerce St. 
Phone: Area Code 214, 
Riverside 9-3287 
Denver, Colo. 80202 
16407 Federal Building 
20th and Stout Streets 
Phone: Area Code 303, 297-3246 
Des Moines, Iowa 50309 

1216 Paramount Building 
509 Grand Ave. 

Phone: Area Code 516, 284-4222 
Detroit, Mich. 48226 
445 Federal Building 
Phone: Area Code 313, 226-6088 
. 27402 



Ag 
! Area Code 919, 275-9111 

Hartford, Conn. 06103 
18 Asylum St. 
Phone: Area Code 203, 244-3630 

40 



Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 

202 Intel-national Savings Building 

1022 Bethel St. 

Phone: 688977 
Houston, Tex. 77002 

6102 Federal Building 

515 Rusk Ave. 

Phone: Area Code 713, 228-0611 

Jacksonville, Fla. 32202 
612 Greenleaf Building 
208 Laura St. 
Phone: Area Code 904, 364-7111 

Kansas City, Mo. 64106 
Room 2011, 911 Walnut St. 
Phone Area Code 816, FR 4-3141 

Los Angeles, Calif. 90015 
Room 460, Western Pacific Building 
1031 South Broadway 
Phone: Area Code 213, 688-2833 

Memphis, Tenn. 38103 
345 Federal Office Building 
167 North Main St, 
Phone: Area Code 901, 584-3214 

Miami, Fla. 33130 
928 Federal Office Building 

51 S. W. First Ave. 

Phone: Area Code 306, 360-5267 

Milwaukee, Wis. 53203 

Straus Building: 

238 West Wisconsin Ave. 

Phone: Area Code 414, BE 2-8600 

Minneapolis, Minn. 65401 

306 Federal Building 

110 South Fourth St. 

Phone: Area Code 612, 834-2133 
New Orleans, La, 70130 

909 Federal Office Building, South 

610 South St. 

Phone: Area Code 604, 627 6646 
New York, N. Y. 10001 

gist Floor, Empire State Building 

o50 Fifth Ave. 

Phone; Area Code 212. 

LOngacre 3-3377 

Philadelphia, Pa. 19107 

Jefferson Building 

1015 Chestnut St. 

Phone: Area Code 216, 697-2850 
Phoenix, Ariz. 85025 

ooil, N !^ eder al Building 

230 North First Ave. 

Phone: Area Code 602, 261-3285 
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15222 

2201 Federal Building 

1000 Liberty Ave. 

Phone: Area Code 412, 644-2860 
Portland, Ore. 97204 

2J7 glc I US. Courthouse 

620 S. W. Morrison St. 

Phone; Area Code 60S, 226-3361 
Reno, Nev. 89502 

2028 Federal Building 

300 Booth St, 

Phone: Area Code 702, 784^6208 
Richmond, Va. 23204 

%K e ^ ral Building 
400 North 8th St. 

Phone: Area Code 703, 649-3611 



St. Louig, Mo. 63103 
2611 Federal Building 
1520 Market St. 

Phone: Area Code 314, MA 2-4243 
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 

3235 Federal Building 

126 South State St. 

Phone: Area Code 801, 524-5110 
San Francisco, Calif. 94102 

Federal Building, Box 30013 

460 Golden Gate Ave. 

Phone: Area Code 41C, 65G~C80<1 
Santurce, P. R. 00907 

Room 028, <;0fi Condndo AVG, 

Phone: 723-4640 
Savannah, Ga. 31402 

236 U.S. Courthouse and Post Qfllco 
Building 

125-29 Bull St. 

Phone: Area Code 912, 232-4321 
Seattle, Wash. 98104 

809 Federal Office BuildinK 

909 First Ave. 

Phone: Area Code 206, G83-6035 



Army Develops 

Lightweight Fuel 

Supply System 

A lightweight auxiliary fuel Hupply 
system for uso with poi'mnnently or 
fiemi-permaiiontly installed otigfne- 
driven equipment ia hemp dovoloned 
by the U. S. Army Mobility Ufiuhi- 
ment Command's Engineer Kosonrch 
and Development Laboratories. Fort 
Belvoir, Va, 

_ The 15-pound aystem, which can bo 
installed in a fuel drum in only 10 
minutes, features a specially designed 
submersible 24-volt electric pxinm, two 
and one-eighth inches in dinmotor find 
12 inches long 1 , with a capacity rato 
or 46 gallons an hour. 

Equipped with 60 foot of half-Inch 
nose, the pump may bo located at 
various depths within the fuel con- 
tainer by means of a drum adaptor 
positioned at nny point on Uio hose, 
Mectric leads are embedded in or 
threaded through the hose and con- 
nected to the engine fuel and electric 
system by a quick-disconnect combl. 
nation coupling 1 . 

Tho. now system is designed to 
eliminate vapor lock and safety liaz- 
ards, to operate over a wide tempera- 
ture range, and to provide flexibility 
in the location of auxiliary fuel drums 
and tanks. It may bo adapted for UKO 
as a fuel transfer system or as n, re- 
lueling system for mobile equipment. , 

Design and performance rcqulre- 
11 or he ? vs tem arc contained 

Specification MIL P-52493 

(MO). iHtary StendnHl MS 
November 1 I96S 



Civilian Reserve 

w (Continued from Pcif/e SO) 

Bcction dnrsK not include advising, con- 
sulting, or acting on any matter pend- 
ing before any department or agency. 
KcspniiHibHiticn of Reserve Units. 

When reservists are called up they 
will l>o assigned, in the field or in 
WnHhiiiRton, to roHpoiiHlhillticH for 
which they have been trained by their 
units. Ohviounly these responsibilities 
vnry widely in character, depending 
on tbe department or agency. Hero 
nro mime example of responsibility 
in th event of emergency: 

Department of Agriculture. Do rend 
cropfi, livestock and poultry against 
radiological fallout mid biological and 
chemical warfare agents; nnnlyxn 
food reijinreimintH and supplies; as- 
nofiH attack uffectfi on agricultural and 
food roNoiiUH'H; eHthmito needs and 
claims for manpower, equipment, imp- 
jiliosi itnd iiervicea. 

Department of Dcfcnw. DiaHemi- 
mitct Miirviviil instructions and other 
civil defense information to tbe public. 
(Iti'iHigli all available media, including 
the Emurffeiicy Broadcasting SyRhtm. 

DeiHii'lmc'iit f Commerce, Tumio prl- 
oritlwi nnd directives tit expedite in- 
diiHtrinl mobilisation and recovery; 
nlliii'ule civil transportation capacity 
to meet em-uintlal nc!dn; direct ocnan 
vfifiHfll movements, allocate tonnage, 
miiilulLion nliipn nml reactivate ro- 
Horvtt Meet shipHj mirvoy and construct 
vital higlnviiyH; provide statistical 
data ti nmmiCncturotti, trade and 
ImiiHporlfitlon. 

Dotmrlnumt of the Interior, Direct 
and control Aid, energy and mineral 
mtonrcwi with utatn and loenl govern- 
ment participation. 

Ih'imrliiu.'nt of Labor. Subject to 
iiiilliorl/.ntion by Congress or tho 
Pnwldent, emergency manpower rog- 
iKtrnlion by Hkill, agci, physical fllncNH; 
niqulrlnif pnroonnl HerviceH neeHHnary 
to ineot oHHontial tutrvival rctjuiro- 
montB. 

Federal Coinimiuicfttlon CoinndH- 
fllon. Work with appropriate vosource 
ngondcH to liiHtiro avntlnblllLy of mn- 
tcrialH, nitinpowor, otiuipmont, Hup- 
plioH and norvken to support common 
cnrrlora and commiflHlon lfconncn. 
Glfllm Hiich roHourcoH tm needed. 

Intcrstiito Commerce Commission. 
Allocate tho use of domestic intei'Htuto 
mirfnco transportation and storage to 
operators nnd UHOL-BJ ndminiator prl- 
orilioH Byfltoma necoflsary to move- 
ment of essential freight and passen- 
gers, 

Dsfanto Industry Bulletin 



Department of Housing and Urban 
Development. Direct construction, re- 
pair and management of emergency 
housing and related facilities; act as 
claimant for their material require- 
ments. 

Oflico of Emergency Planning. Co- 
ordinate, in behalf of the President 
the broad field of emergency mobiliza- 
tion, including the Executive Reserve 
and, if needed and authorised, wajje 
and price fltuhilixatlon, 
AHHignmnt of Menibcrfl. 

UuHeiTidtH aHHigncd to national 
headquarters will report to Govern- 
ment relocation sdtott in tho time of 
an (tmergeiuiy mobilization. RoHorvista 
UHKiKned to one of tho eiRht veKional 
Kfidernl Kmergency Centers will re- 
port to the field offlccm. Kneh center 
Hliould lit! boimed in hardened under-- 
ground Hite.H protected against nuclear 
attucl; and fallout. Certain of lhe 
Kit<!n arcs no\v in uso. Others arc scliod- 
uleil fur early 



ContractlnB for LoglHtlc Support 

(.Continued from Pago 31) 
(if inUjgratiKl Ingisties mamiKement JH 
another thriwt in thin direction. 

.Speeidcation WU-JJO in another 
thrust. Here wo enter into contracts 
which call for the producer to make 
thono parts and components be needs 
to keep ahead of final assembly, but 
at the mimes time nwko those name 
partw and components Inuncdintely 
available to UH for d<iployment tuip- 
port where ncccHHtiry. Wo have to 
make our withdrawal decisions in 
Umo to pormit tho contractor to make 
ui) mure piirtw nnd componontH to 
keep his production lino going under 
tlio prime contract nysUiin. Hut the 
point is, wo are relying on the con- 
tractor for this material support 
rather than simply buying up a pro- 
visioning quantity at tho outset and 
putting it on our nholvH to hold until 
wo nued it. 
Ccmchittion. 

Tlio sub-title to my wmiarku was 
labelled as tbe "Government position". 
It is dilllcult, of COUI-HR, to call some- 
thing a "position" unless you say I'm 
for it or I'm against it, Tho position 
esprosKcd here may scorn to bo equi- 
vocal and ambiguous. 

Lot mo conclude, therefore, by sum- 
marizing what tho position Is. Wo 
hnvo u proven and demonstrated sup- 
port syatom In tho Military Sci-vicea 
today, Wo have profofudonnla whoso 
lives arc dovotod exclusively to tho 
mothodology and techniques of sup- 
ply management, maintenance man- 
agement and aupport. 



These prof ess ion nls are responsive 
to command. And at the same time 
they are responsive to the demands 
of economy. For this latter reason, 
these same professionals are con- 
stantly Becking, developing and imple- 
menting new mid better ways to do 
the support job. 

Contracting for logistic support 3s 
one of the ways to which the pro- 
fessionals are wholly open minded. 
They are not only receptive, but arc 
carefully expanding; into this, the con- 
tracting approach. Wo are gaining in 
experience In this approach and, with 
this experience, we nrc refining our 
contractual histrumonts to give us 
progressively greater assurance that 
the support will lie there when it Is 
needed. 

As wo gain in experience and re- 
finement, wo expect to gain in con- 
tractor reaponso and gain in confi- 
dence ns well. In tho final analysis, it 
id something like learning to ride a 
bicycle, tt scares tbe kid tho first 
time ho tnltcH off. But as he learns 
how to achieve and maintain his bal- 
ance, and as he gains in experience, 
he gains in confidence as well. 

Pretty soon ho sails past the house 
and hollow, "Look Ma, no hnnds. . ." 

That In the direction In which wo 
arc going in contractor support. But 
wo don't want to crash in the 
process. 

That's tho Government's position, 
UH best I can state It. 



Air 1 Force to Catalog 
Satellite Radar Portraits 

Satellite shapes will "sit" for a 
gnllory of electronic portraits aa part 
of an Air Force program to develop 
a catalog of. Images of possible epaco 
vehicle shapoa which can bo applied 
to radnr observation of objects orbit- 
ing tho earth. 

The Electronic Systems Di vision of 
tho Air Force Systems Command 
plans to tftko electronic measurements 
of some two dozen satellite models, 
ranging in she from four-Inches to 
nine-feet long. 

Medals are basically cylindrical and 
cone ah aped , mod i fled with flaring 
ends or rounded noses, Theso rela- 
tively plain shapes will also bo 
equipped with ilns, spikes represent- 
ing antennae and rods running the 
length of the body, 

The electronic portraits will be 
taken on tho Radar Target Scatter In- 
stallation of tho Air Force Missile 
Development Center, Hollonmn AFB r 
N.M., during 2,000 hours of teats run- 
ning through December. Models will 
bo suspended in. front of a radar and 
mechanically rotated to simulate spin- 
ning, tumbling nnd othor movements. 



41 




Contracts of $1,000,000 and over 
awarded during the month of October 
1966: 

DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

4 Saddler Textiles, Inc., New York City, N.V. 
1,631,636, 949,000 square yds of cotton 
duck cloth, Defense Personnel Sunnort 
Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 

6 ~i", es A er Di Lflwson & Co., Long Beach, Calif. 
81,601,397. 46,620 cases of ration supple- 
ment sundry packs. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 

7 5?i P? fensc Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia, Pa., has issued the following 
contracts for black combat boots: 
Gardiner Shoe Co., Gardiner, Maine. SI,- 
493,989. 126,000 pairs. 

?,' ,;, Walher Snoo Co., Aahelioro, N.C. 
$1,842,800. 120.000 pairs. 

?, t0 ^ Shoe Mf ff- Co., Hanover, Pa. 
?1,OS4,9BB. 84,000 pairs. 



M^iP"'?*' Naah v!'le, Tenn. $3,830,000. 
300,000 pairs. 



Endicott Johnson Corn.. Emlicnft N v 
1,148,268. 100,000 pair'a'of Sw reE 
ant safety shoes. Endicott. Defense Per- 
sonnel Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 

r 8 ^ 1Ili & C " New York City, N.Y. 
M,1BB,B80. B00.003 yds of wind resistant 

P W New " York eft o 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 

~ SbB TCorP K' GU "f? rd ' Conn ' * 2 '- 
Pneumatic mattresses. 

j Pwwnwl Support Oen- 

de]phia. 

12 Abate Clothing, Inc., Atlantic Rltv M T 
m'en's wool Sardine 

Birtl Support ccn - 



.p 

~~Ka Mf8 ', C - Bo"*. Mass. $1,010.760. 
ffir D n B w . ol <. eabardlne overcoats. 
dTlShia pj" onnfll SWKt Center, Phila^ 

I8 ~%? r l s n ' Br a " New York City, N.Y SI - 
488,682. 3,000,000 cotton baft towel l a . fe 
Phfc? pf sonnel Su PP rt Center, Philadel- 

IS-RepublloSteel Corp., Ohicaso, 111. $1,807,- 
ll nV 40 ",? olB of barbed wire (80 
C!nb D uf Ohio 00 " 8 *"" 1 " SuMly Cent "' 

~'" e & , Co ", Buffalo. N.Y. $1,236,800. 
men's polyester wool tropical 



tent 



V Cant0n ' Mt8H ' 
1 '"'P"". medium size, 



t-' I< t?l lP 2 1 ? t dfl Nemours & Co., 



P* f C ?NTRACT LEGEND 
Contract information is Hated in 
we following sequence: Date 

SSFETl ~; v / lue T aterial 

Sri 1 ! to B b t* P erf e d-Location of 
Performed 



42 



DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



The Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alexan- 

dria, Va., has awarded the following con- 

tracts for fuel oil and gasoline: 

Gulf Oil Corp., Houston, Tex. 85,084,011 ; 

Sinclair Refining Co., New York City, 

N.Y., $l,G4ii,9S8 nnd Hess OH and Chem- 

ical Corp., Perth Amboy, N.J., 31,307,706. 

20 American Tent Co,, Canton, Miss. $2,015,- 
880. 12,000 general purnoac touts. Defense 
Personnel Support Canter, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

21 Ethyl Corp., Now York City, N.Y, 31,402,- 
712. 7,000 ten-gallon drums of smoke sup- 
pressant additives. Defense General Sun- 
ply Center, Richmond, Va. 

Burlington Industries, New York City, N.Y. 
S2,G30,315. 2,000,000 linear yds of wind- 
resistant sateen cloth. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 
C. M. London Co., New York City, N.Y. 
82.045,252. 1,348,223 linear yds of wind- 
resistant sateen cloth. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 
24E.C.T. Corp., FayeUovllle, N,0. $1,161,241. 
3GO.OOO paii-a of men's while trousers. De- 
fense Personnel Support Center, Philadel- 
phia, Pn. 

26 Hart Metals, Inc., New York City, N.Y. 
83,347,776. Magnesium powder. Defense 
,. g eii t ei Supply Center, Richmond, Vn. 
11 Koch Refrigerators, Kansas City, Mo. SI,. 
258,000. 200 refrigerators. Defense General 
Supply Center, Richmond, Vn. 
28 The Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia, Pa,, has awarded the follow- 
ing contracts for men's polyester-woo] 
tropical coats ; 

Albert Turner Co., New York Cily, N.Y. 
S2,17Q,EOO. 76,000; Hanncrerafl Clntlilne 
Co., Philadelphia, Pa., $1,881,000. GO.OOO; 
Howard Stores Corp., Brooklyn, N.Y. 31,- 
610,000. GO.OOO. Raleifth Mfg., Inc.. 
Baltimore, Md. 81,122,400. 40,000. Rich- 
mond Bros., Co., Cleveland, Ohio. Sl,- 
001,400. 30,000. 

~~!# Crosso Garment Mfg. Co., La Crosso, 
WIs. 82,738,087. 190,580 regular sleeping 
bags and 84,448 larRe-slzo mountain Bleep- 
ing bags. Defense Personnel Support Con- 
ter, Philadelphia, Pa. 

Tcnneaseo Overall Co., Tullahomn, Tonn. 
1,653,786. 520,000 pairs of men'a iiolyeator 
and wool tropical trousers. Defense Per- 
sonnel Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 

~? B b SSi L n il n w . r n flnco Co " Hoslo", Mnss. 8L- 
Jiii.a/b. 37,480 men's wool sorgo overconta. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia, Pn. 

~S5. dst P ln Broa - nnd Co - Now York City, 
N.Y. $1,616,600. 50,000 men's wool sorgo 
overcoats. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia, Pn. 

31 Peoples Co , Hun ting ton, W. Vn. $2,088,- 

i A 1 ; 428 Bmn11 Benoral purpose tonto 

and 12,103 vestibules for umnll general 

purpose tents. Defense Pcraonnol Support 

Center, Philadelphia, Pn. 

iw&oS? ^ ? Ducl i Co " st - Lo '8. Mo. 
81,608,820 .0,538 small general purpOBe 
tents nnd 6,000 vestibules for amnll general 
purpose tents. Defense Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 
Mobil Oil Corp., Now York City, N.Y. 
bn "' Gla f Navy 

e " BO Fuo1 



ARMY 

Co ?2i ructl0 ' 1 , Co., St. Paul, Mtnn, 
166mm high oxplosive projec- 

,. ew ?l lt ^ ton \ MInn - Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Jollet, 111. 

proi!ucts ' Inc - SylaoauBB, 

1S5mm . hl h explosive 
Ammunition Pro- 
il w. Joliet, III. 
M , otor , s Co , r "" Mnskegon, Mich. 
V* P ran t fl J ulft wnbll for 
combat trucks. Muskeaon. Army Tnnk 
Automotive Command, Wnrren, Mich. 



. 

General Electric, Burlington, Vt, $7,848,- 
the XM12 



nH i 

ES WI J I the M " A1 , *tniie 20mm air- 
craft cannon. Burlington. Army Weap- 
ons Command, Bock Island, 111. 



5 Halvorson-Mnson, Portland, Ore. tl.*7i.. 
140. Work on the John Day Lock and D*s 

n!'. joc J;- ^ cnr Tlie D "llc3. Ore, Enjrinea 
plfll.. Walla Walla, Wnsh. 

r^ n n ? ncllil ""'> r Co., Tlffln, Olilo. |1, 
672,630. 6-ton cranes. Tiffin.. Atiox Mr- 
bllity Lriulpment Command, St. Louis, Ma 
ar^Z? ^""i 11 Corp " Dflwnpy, CnHf. ],- 
360,000. Metal parts tot 2.1fi-lneli i-ockfl*. 
JJowiiey. Ammimition I'rocni-cnienl A 
Siumly Ajjency, Jolict, 111. 
Canadian Commercial Corp., Ottawa, C*TI- 
ada. $1,141,600. Mctnl imi-ta for B.75*lr,tl 
rockctB. Ottawa. Ammunitlori 1'rMur*- 
ment & Supply Agency, Joliet, HI. 
Morrison KnudBcit Corn., and Per In! Coif, 
litUHvillc, Pla, S2.34C.H38. CcmstuMtks 
work at NASA Launch Complex No. 3& *l 
the Kennedy Space Center, Fla. CanaveriJ 
l!.nKlneer Dial., Mori-ltl Jalanit. Fin. 
John 1. Ilcnslcy Co. nnil Novo InddilrUI 
Corp., Djillns, Tex, 0,000.696, Work on At 
Inland Waterway. Delaware Iltyw itt 
Uicsapeako Day, Project. Knirlnccr DTst., 
Philiidolnhla, Pa, 

7 Motor Wheel Corit., Division uf GHlj**r 
Tiro & Rubber Co., Lanahin, Midi, tJ.6SI ( - 
710. Hond wheels for M48 tnnlca. r.nnslnj. 
Army Tank Automotive Center, Wairea. 
Mich. 

Fircatono Tiro & Rubber Co., Akron, Oh To. 
$l,487,l)Hfi. Track nfiacmbllcs (or Mill 
vehicles. Noblesville, Incl. Army Tank 
Automotive Center, Warren, Micii. 
FMC Corp., Clmrlcston, "VV. Va. S2,9]9.3S?. 
Track nsHcmbllca for M118 vdifcTes. 
Charloatun. Army Tank Automollvo Center, 
Wan-L-ti, Mich. 

Kmcrson Electric Co., St. Louis, Mo. |1,- 
415,680. Design and dovol Demerit o( the 
XM2S aircraft armament Riiliaystem for 
AII-1G Hiioy Cohra. liellcoiilcrfl. SI. I^oulj. 
Army Weapons Command, Hock blnnl. III. 
10 United Aircraft, Sikorsky Alrtrafl Dlr.. 
Stratford, Conn. $3,500,00[}. Ucnu ar.d 
componcnta for the CII-5iA helicon!*!, 
Strntfoi'd. Army Aviation Mnterlel Com- 
mand, St. Louis, Mo. 

Ford Motors, Dearborn, Mich, JSa.TCO.GiU. 
M-ton trunks. HiBhland Park, Hlth. 
Project Mnniidor, Gcnernl Pnr])OJ(l V*iE- 
dos, Warren, Mich. 

(ioncrnl Motors, Clcvolnnd, Olito. tliUS.* 
000. Production of ropnlr imrts let iht 
MGB1 voliicle. Cltivcltind. Army ffcsponi 
Command, Hock Islmul, III. 
Koolirlng Co., Theiv Lornin, Div., 
Ohio. $2,347,130. Uioael engine 
12'Xi-ton cnnaclty, arnno uliovels. 
Mobility Eauipmont Coinmnnd, St. Lout), 
Mo. 

llPhtlca Corp., Newport Bcncli, Call), t?,- 
800,000, Continued research ant! dcreSop- 
mont on iho Chapari-nl air (tcfcnao mlsall* 
flyslcm. Newport Dench. Army JIUslI* 
Command, Huntsvlllo, Aln. 

Continental Motors Corp,, Muskosoti, lliclt. 
$0,470,742. Engine nBjjenibllcB with 9C(*s- 
Borlcs for Vi-ton utility truclta. Miulogoa. 
Project Mannuor, General Purpon V-rtiE* 
clen, Wnrren, Mich, 

OH Rlcvntor Co., Atlnnta, Go. H.Ufl.H* 
Modification of two elevators nnil to fur- 
nish nnd inetall three now elovntors In tfce 
vehicle assembly btilldlne nt Launch Com- 
plex 30, Kennedy Snaco Gcn(or, FJi. 
Cnnnvcrnl Engineer Diet., Merrill Ii!in4, 
Pla. 

A. 0, Smith Corp., Ohlcnpo, III. l,!lS,IiM. 
Acquinltlon and fabrication of c^ulpmtnt 
to ho Installed In contractor's plan! tt 
Waco, Tex. Ammunition Procurement i 
Supply Apfonoy, Jollct, II]. 
13 AVCO Corp., Stratford. Conn. $11>, 
Modification kits for the TE3-L13 
Strtitford. Army Aviation Caiiimnnd, EL 
Louis, Mo. 

General Motors, Santa Bnrbnra. Cnllf. (1, 
040,000. Continuation of an Advanced Re- 
search Project Agency B|>tm eared liyftf 
velocity r jingo research pros mm, S*TI!* 
Barhnra. Army Mlsallo Command, Ihnti- 
villo, Aln. 

MnrUn K. Eby Construction C., Wlclft*. 
Kan. $9,008,700. Work at th Brofccn &?* 
Dam nnd Reservoir Project. He Cur It 3j 
Country, Okla. Engineer Dial., Tulii, 
Okla. 

November 19(6 



GOBI Co., Chicago, III. $1,000,000. One 
offset press. Chicago. Army Electronics 
fgf Command, Port Monmouth, N.J. 

14 Edward H. Mnrden Corp.. Allston, Muss. 
SI, 422,400. Construction of n Federal Re- 
Kional Center for the Office of Civil De- 
fense nnd Office of Emergency Planning. 
Maynard, Mass. Now England Engineer 
Dial., Waltham, Mass. 

Eugene Luhr & Co.. and Pine Bluff Sand & 
Gravel Co., Columbia, 111. $1,032,133. Con- 
struction work on the Arkansas River nnd 
Tributaries Lock nnd Dam Project. Dumas, 
Ark. Engineer- Diet., Little Rock, Ark. 
Dunbar & Sullivnn Dredging Co., Detroit, 
Mtcli. $1,382.000. Dredging and excavation 
work nt the Cor del I Hull Project. Carthago 
Tenn. Engineer Diat., Nashville, Tenn. 
RCA, Camden. N.J. $1,380,937. Portable 
radio acts, Camden. Army Electronics 
Command, Philadelphia, Pa, 
Hughes Aircraft, Culver City, Calif. $3,- 
B17.B73. FY 1007 TOW missile research & 
development. Culver City. Army Mlaslle 
Command, Huntsville, Ala. 
American Machine & Foundry Co., Brook- 
lyn, N.Y. S2,322,7fiS. production facilities 
for bomb components. Brooklyn. Ammu- 
nition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
JoHet, 111. 

A, 0, Smith Corp., Chicago, 111. $8,473,009. 
Metnl parts for 760-pound bombs. East 
Cbicnffo, Ind., Dangorneld, Tex. and Waco, 
Tex. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, Jollet, III. 

Mngnnvox Co., Fort Wayne, Ind. $8,000,- 
000. Radio communication seta. Fort 
Wayne. Army Electronics Command, Fort 
Monmouth, N.J. 

17 Prtoo Broa. Co., Dayton, Ohio. $1,078,020. 
Construction nnd maintenance dredging 
work (it the Green Bay Harbor, Wis., 
Project. Engineer Diat., Chicago, III. 
Barber-Green Co., Aurora, 111. S2,'iQE J 090. 
Ten dieflcl engine driven, asphalt mixing 
plnnta. Aurora. Army Mobility Equipment 
Command, St. Louis, Mo. 
Coleman Bros, Inc., Renilvillo, Mnsa. $1,- 
071.206. (NASA funds). Construction of 
foundations for n high rise lab-administra- 
tion building, a microwave labj an audi- 
tor! iim-cafcter in building and a utility 
support building at the NASA Electronic 
Research Center, Cambridge, Mass. New 
England Engineer Dial., Wnltham, Mass. 
IS Peter Klowlt Sons' Co. and Chris Berg, 
Inc., Omaha, Neb, $4,400,000. Construc- 
tion of an unllncd tunnel for n POL 
(petroleum, oils and lubricants) pipeline 
being Installed between Whittler and 
Anchorage, Alaska. Engineer Dlst., An- 
chorage, Alaska, 

Chrysler Corp., Warren, Mich. $1,407,321. 
Booster adapters for bombs. Warren. 
Procurement Detachment, Chicago, 111. 
Basalt Rock Co., Nnna, Calif. $1,031,701. 
Work on the Sncrnmcnto River bank pro- 
tection project. Between Rio Vista nnd 
Sacramento, Calif. Engineer Dlst,, Sacra- 
mento, Calif. 

10 IToUton Defense Corp., Ktngaport, Tonn, 
$2,008,300, Various explosives nnd opera- 
tion and maintenance activities at the 
Holaton Army Ammunition Plant, Kings- 
poet, Tenn. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Jollet, 111. 
Appalachian Power Co., New York City, 
N.Y. $1,628,107. Operation of the Govern- 
ment owned power plant at the Army 
Ammunition Plant, Radford, Va, Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joliet, 111. 

Atlns Chemical Industries, Wilmington, 
Del. $7,107,870. TNT and lor operation 
and malntennnco nativities at the Volun- 
teer Army Ammunition Plant, Chatta- 
nooga, Tonn, Ammunition Procurement 
& Supply Agency, JoHet, 111, 
Hamilton Watch Co., Lancaster, PH. ?l r 
798,051. Rochet fuzes. Lancaster. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, JoHet, 

Ajnx Hardware Corp,, City of Industry, 
Calif. $3,018,000. Fuzes for 81mm mortar 
ehetls. City of Industry, Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, JoHet, 111. 

L. G, Bnrcua & Sons, Kansas City, Knn. 
81,361,200. Work on the Des Moines, lown, 
local flood protection project. DCS Moines. 
Engineer Dlst., Hock Island, 111. 

Chrysler Motors, Detroit, Mich. $2,071,990. 
MODI vehicles (one-ton power wngone), 
Detroit. Army Tnnk Automotive Command, 
Wnrren, Mich, 

20 AVCO Corp., Stratford, Conn. $4.273,330, 
TG6-L-7 engines for CH--I7 helicopters. 
Stratford. Army Aviation Materiel Com- 
mand, St. Louis, Mo. 



~~&n h wk RuH > Co., Akron. Ohio. $1,106,- 
000. Pneumatic tires, 1100x20, 12 ply. truck 
and bus, for the six-ton wrecker. Akron. 
Army Tank Automotive Command, Wnr- 
ren, Mich. 

~~H- S ', ? ubber & Tlrc Co., Detroit, Mich, SI.. 
816,447. Pneumatic tires, 1100x20, 12 ply, 
truck and bus for the six-ton wrecker. Los 
Angeles, Calif. Army Tank Automotive 
Command, Warren. Mich. 

~H n J2J? arbidc Cor P- New Y rk City, N.Y. 
31,580,922. Batteriea for AN/PRC-26 
radio sets. Cleveland, Ohio. Army Elec- 
tronics Command, Philadelphia, Pa. 

RCA, Camden, N.J. $1,539,450. Compact 
lightweight radio acts, AN/GRC-60, for 
ground stations. Camden. Army Electronics 
Command, Philadelphia, Pn. 

General Electric, Burlington. Vt. $2,156.- 
320. Repair parts for 7.G2mm aircraft Rims. 
auf ington. Army Weapons Commnnd, 
Rock Island. 111. 

"~SS r nlSl M " 8 ," 8 Corp., Orlando, Pla. S3.- 
000.000. Exploratory development of se- 
lected Pershing components. Orlando 
Army Missile Command, Huntsville, Ala. 
21 WIttronlcs Mfg., Inc., Boyertown, Pa. SI - 
1GG.4G4. Fuacs. (M42S) for 2.75 inch rockets. 
Uoyertown. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, JoHet, 111. 

Chrysler Motors, Detroit, Mich. $1.136,485. 
knsitne assemblies for %-ton trucks. 
Mnryavllle, Mich. Army Tank Automotive 
Center, Warren, Mich. 

Norris Them odor Corp., Los Angelea, 
Calif. SI, 330,947. Procurement of new pro- 
duction equipment nnd renctivation of 
existing equipment nt the Army Ammu- 
tlon Plant, Riverbnnk, Calif. Ammunition 
Procurement & Sup-ply Agency, Jollet, 111, 

Spcrry Rand Corn., New York City, N,Y. 
JO, 037, BBS. Explosives nnd for operation 
and maintenance activities at the Louisi- 
ana Army Ammunition Plant, Shreveport, 
La. Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Attency, JoHet, III. 

24 General Motors, Detroit, Mich. 1.180,821. 
2B ampere regulntlons for %-ton, %-ton 
nnd 2 '/4-ton trucks. Anderson, Ind. Army 
Tnnk Automotive Command, Wnrren, Mich. 

General Tire & Rubber Co., Akron, Ohio. 
$2,849,7'IO. 7.02mm rifle stock assemblies. 
Marion, Ind. Springfield Armory, Spring- 
field, Mass, 

Batesville Mfg. Co., Dntesville, Ark. S4,- 
083,400. Metal ports for the CDU 14A/A 
cnnister bomb unit. Uatesvllle. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, Jo- 
Het, 111. 

ACP Industries, St. Louis, Mo. $1,087,2-11. 
Metnl parts for the CI1U 14A/A canister 
bomb unit. St. Louis. Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, Jollet, 111. 

Scovill Mfg. Co., Wnterbury, Conn. 84,171,- 
813. Metal parts for the CDU 14A/A cnnls- 
tor bomb unit. Wnterbury, Conn. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, JoHet, 

Nntionnl Lead Co., Toledo, Ohio. $1,614,- 
OOQ. Body assemblies for the CHU HA/A 
canister bomb unit. Toledo. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Jollet, 111. 

Nntionnl Lend Co., Potlatown, Pn. $1,427,- 
318. Body assemblies for the CBU 14A/A 
canister bomb unit. Pottatown. Ammuni- 
tion Procurement & Supply Agency, JoHet, 

Honeywell, Inc., Hopkins, Minn. $1,40*7,- 
850. Body assemblies for the CRU 14A/A 
cnnlater bomb unit. Hopkins. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

Itulovn Watch Co,, Jackson Heights, N.Y. 
$1,096,762. 2,76-inch rocket fuzes. Ammu- 
nition Procurement & Supply Agency, Jo- 
liet, 111. 

Fnirchlld Camera and Instrument Corp., 

Long Island, N.Y. 31,841,000. 2.7B-inch 
rocket fuzes. Long Island. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

General Time Corp,, Stamford, Conn. $1,- 
162,300. 2.76-lnch rocket Cuzea. Stnmford. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agen- 
cy, Joliet, 111. 

2 D Martin-Marietta Corp,, Orlando, Fla. $1,- 
000,000. Exploratory development of se- 
lected Pcrshlng components, Orlando. 
Army Missile Commnnd, Iluntsvilte, Ala. 

Snco-Lowcll, Northeast DIv., Mnremont 
Corp., Saco, Maine. 31,084,008. Bnrrels for 
the 20mm, M61 and M6IA1 Gntltnp Gun 
(Vulcan); and 1 act of final inspection 
equipment for the above barrels for use 
on aircraft mnchin-e guns. Saco. Army 
Wenpons Command, Rock Island, III. 

Mnr tin-Marietta Corp., Orlnndo, Fla. jld,- 
000,000. Research nnd development of im- 
proved Pershing ground support equip- 



ment. Orlando. Army Missile Command, 
Huntsville, A!a, 

26 Hercules, Inc., Wilmington, Del. 3fi,392,<300. 
Propellants, explosives and O&MA activ- 
ities. Army Ammunition Plant, Radfo.rd, 

AlU* I 5SBlt I iii? > " eu " !Birat & Supply 

Mason & Hanger, Sllaa Mason Co., New 
York City, N.Y. 17,6*4,304. Loading, as- 
sembling and packing 1 of artillery ammuni- 
tion. Army, Ammunition Plant, Burling- 
ton, lown. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

U.S. Rubier Co., New York City, NY 
^l 5 . 6 ' 308 . 1 Ammunition, explosives and 
O&MA activities. Army Ammunition Plant, 
Jolfet, 111. Ammunition Procurement & 
Supply Agency. Joliet, 111. 

27 ~fJ, ar J t Element Co., Benton Harbor. 
Mich .80,303,302. Industrial tractors. Ben- 
ton Harbor. Army Mobility Equipment 
Command. St. Louis, Mo. 

American Cyatoacope Makers, Inc., Pelhnm 
Manor, N.Y. &2,44BJB8. Telescopes, tele- 
scope equipment and hanger assemblies. 
Bronx, N.Y. Frankfotrd Arsenal, Pa. 

~ll ( :! l S e " c * Ilter Co " Fwt Worth, Tex. S3,- 
046 .248. Main rotor hub aaaernbliea for 
UH-1 a rcraft. Fort Worth. Army Aviation 
Materiel Command, St. Louis, Mo. 

Bell Helltpoter Co., Fort Worth, Tex. SI - 
021,623. Gear box assemblies for UH-1 air- 
craft. Fort Worth. Army Aviation Materiel 
Command, St. Louis, Mo. 

Hushes Aircraft, Fullerton, Calif. 51,760,- 
000. Modernization program of the AN/ 
TSQ-61 Fire Distribution System for the 
Marine Corps. Fullerton. Southwest Pro- 
curement Agency, Pasadena, Calif. 

Phllco Corp., Philadelphia, Pn. $1,600,000. 
A voice access system find ancillary Items. 
Willow Grove, nnd Philadelphia, Pa. Army 
Electronics Command. Fort Monraouth, 
N.J. 

Aerojet General Corp., Downey, Calif. 53,- 
106,612. Cluster hombs. Camden, Ark. 
Edgewood Arsenal, Md. 

28 A. G. Schoomaker Co., Saunnlito, Calif. SI.- 
188,193. Construction of the Meek Island 
land based power plant. Engineer Dlst., 
Honolulu, Hawaii, 

Rohm & Haas Co., Philadelphia, Pa. ?2>- 
600,000. Propellent research program for 
one year. Huntsville, Aln. Army Missile 
Command, Huntsville, Aln. 

American Machine & Foundry Co., Brook- 
lyn, N.Y, 53,361.841. Metal parts for 760- 
Ib. bombs. Garden City, N.Y. Ammunition 
Procurement & Supply Agency, Joliet, III. 

Kennedy Van Snun Corp., Danville, Pa. 
$2,377,120. Metal parts for practice pro- 
JectiEes for the MOO tnnk. Danville. Ammu- 
nition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joliet, III, 

Aerojet General Corp., Downey, Calif, $1,- 
62D, BOO. Compontnts for bomb dispensers, 
Downey. Ammunition Procurement & Sup- 
ply Agency, Joliet, 11], 

Avco Corp., Stratford, Conn. 7,153,000. 
T-6a-L-lE aircraft engines for UH-1D 
helicopters. Stratford. Army Aviation Ma- 
teriel Command, St. Louis, Mo, 

Avco Corp., Stratford, Conn. 82,400,000. 
T-5S-L-1B turbine aircraft enehiea for tho 
OV-1 aircraft (Mohawk); nnd T-53-L-11 
engines for the UH-1E aircraft. Stratford. 
Army AvJntlon Materiel Command, St. 
Louia, Mo, 

Mnr tin-Marietta Corp., Orlando, Fla. $1,- 
000,028. Continued installation, of modifi- 
cation kits In support of the Per a hi ng 
weapons system. Orlnndo. Army Misalle 
Commnnd, Huntaville, Ala. 

31 Hercules, Inc., Wilmington, Del. $7,218,426. 
2.76-inch rocket propellant and O&MA 
activities. Sunflower Army Ammunition 
Plant, Lawrence, Kan. Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, JoHet, 111, 

Scovill Mfg. Co., Waterbury, Conn. $1,727> 
7GC. Metal parts for bombs. "Waterbury. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply 
Agency, JoHet, 111, 

Merz Engineering Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 
51,080,300. Bomb dispensers. Indianapolis. 
Ammunition Procurement & Supply Agen- 
cy, Jollet, 111. 

Honeywell, Inc., Hopkins, Minn. $1,316,- 
280. Facilities necessary to expand pro- 
duction capability for fuzes nnd bomb 
cluster units-. New Brighton, Minn. Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joliet, 111. 

Merz Engineering Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 
$1,703,630. Bomb dispenser a nnd miscel- 
laneous ancillary items. Indianapolis. Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
Joliet, 111. 

Aerojet General, Downey, Calif. $1,810,162. 
Bomb dispensers and miscellaneous anoEl- 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



43 



lary items. Downey. Ammunition Procure- 
ment & Supply Agency, Joliet, 111. 

(Jeneral Motors, Detroit, Mich. 81,518,941. 
Diesel engines for the M113 family of 
vehicle-i, Detroit. Army Tank Automotive 
Center, Warren, Mich. 

General Motors, Indianapolis, Ind. 53,560,- 
198. Transmissions for the M551 General 
Sheridan lank. Indianapolis, Army Tank 
Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 

Bowen McLaughlin York, York, Pa. S3,- 
052,410. Self-propelled 8-Inch howitzers and 
recovery vehicles. Hair, Pa. Army Tank 
Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 

PMC Corp.. San Jose, Calif. 529,357,230. 
Armored personnel carriers, and cargo car- 
riers. South Charleston, W. Va. Army 
Tank Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 

Honeywell, Inc., Tampa, Fla. 52,500,000. 
Classified electronic equipment. Tampa, 
Army Electronics Command, Fort lion- 
mouth, N.J. 

Collins Radio Co., Richardson, Tex. ?3.- 
213,694. Radio terminal sets. Dallas, Tex. 
Army Electronics Command, Fort Mon- 
mouth, N.J. 

Mngnavoi Co., Fort Wayne, Ind. 51,705,- 
071. Components of vehicular communica- 
tion sets. Fort Wayne. Army Electronics 
Command, Fort Monmouth, N.J. 

General Electric, West Lynn, Mass. 52,- 
350,000. T-64-GE engines for the advanced 
aerial fire support system. West Lynn. 
Army Aviation Materiel Command, St. 
Louis, Mo. 

United Aircraft, Pratt & Whitney Aircraft 
Div., East Hartford, Conn. 517,242,932. 
Engines for the CH-54A aircraft (Flying 
t,rnne). East Hartford. Army Aviation 
Materiel Command, St. Louis, Mo. 

Watcrrllet Arsenal, N.Y. 56,417,430. 176mm 
cannons and barrel assemblies. Watervllet 
T , ' , A my w eapons Command, Rock 
Island, III. 

NAVY 

3 Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Sunnyvale, 
Calif. 523,261,444. Engineering aervicea 
in support of the Polaris program. Sunny- 
vale. Special Project Office. 

$11,764,280. Construction of two'oeean- 
ographic research ships. Bay City. Naval 
bnip Systems Command. 
Bethlehem Steel Corp., Baltimore Md SI - 
325,600. Overhaul of the landing 'ship! 
dock USS CASA GRANDE (LSD-IS* 
Dial e ' In<iuattllal Manager, 5th Naval 

Associates, Inc., Nashua, N.H. 
U. Classified electronic etiuip- 
mand ~" lahufl< Nflval Air Systems Corn- 

"UnHed Aircraft, East Hartford, Conn. 
11,607,794. Spare parts for engines for 
F-0F and F-8A aircraft. 89,370,987. Spare 
parts for TF-30-Pfl engines for A-7A alr- 

Si nm East - D l I S rL J !to , rd L -. Nflvy Aviation Sup- 
ply Office, Philadelphia, Pa. 

~ wVi'aJ^'S* 1111 * 8 L Cotp .-' p mona, Calif. 
W.ui.UG. Iteaeareh and development of a 
new dual thrust rocket motor for the 
Standard missile. Pomona. Naval Ord- 
nance Systems Command. 
a-f^A 9 instrument, Inc., Dallas, Tex S2 - 
110 j Com P n ents for the AN/AAPQ- 

q* r ?. Byatem i Dalla8 - Naval Supply 
Systems Command. 

oapace Corp,, Dallas, Tex, $18 - 
.-... Services anil materials to extend 
7-f u e lifc and incorporate Improve- 
ment changes | n F8D aircraft. Dallas 
Naval Air Systems Command, 
Alsco, Inc., St. Louis, Mo. $4,491,688. 
Rocket launchers. St. Louis. Naval Air 
Systems Command. 

"nnn'Snn 1 D ltB } l , Ci ' Sfln D 'o. Calif. $3,- 
&M; Tt okhl . K , . rn 2 ar modlncation . 
San Diego Naval Air Systems Command. 

" " ' ' Calif, si.- 



10 Sperry Rand Corp., Syosset, L.I., N.Y. 
53,000,000. Instrument and control sub- 
systems for the NR-1 vehicle. Syosaet. 
Special Projects Office. 

-United Aircraft, East Hartford, Conn. 
53,203,400. TF-30-P-3 engines for the Air 
Force. East Hartford. Naval Air Systems 
Command. 

Columbia University, New York City, N.Y. 
53,200,000, Research in acoustic detection. 
Dobbs Ferry, N.Y. Office of Navnl Re- 
search, Washington, D.C. 

Jacksonville Shipyards, Charlestown, 5.C. 
51,526,000. Regular overhaul of the am- 
munition ship USS Wrangell (AE-12). 
Charleston. Industrial Manager, 6th 
Naval Dist. 

12 United Aircraft, East Hartford, Conn. $5,- 
70G.002. J52-P-8A engines. East Hartford. 
Naval Air Systems Command. 
General Electric, Cincinnati, Ohio. $1,604,- 
786, Spare parts for J79-GE-8 en Bines. 
Cincinnati. Navy Aviation Supply Office, 
Philadelphia. Pa. 

13 Hughes Aircraft, Fullerton, Calif. 132,136,- 
636. Automatic Track-While-Scannlng Ra- 
dar System for the Harking Sands Mlsailo 
Range at Knuai, Hawaii. Navy PurchaBing 
Office, Washington, D.C. 

Kollmorgen Corp., Northampton, Mans, 
SI, 820, 700. Design, development nnd eval- 
uation of n prototype periscope system for 
submarines. Northampton. Naval Ship 
Systems Command, 

General Electric, Cincinnati, Ohio. $4,080,- 
364. Design, development and evaluation 
of a prototype periscope syatem for sub- 
mnrines. Cincinnati. Naval Ship Systemn 
Command. 

Itck Corp., Lexington, Masa. $1,918,066. 
Design, development and evaluation of a 
prototype periscope system for submarines. 
Burlington, Mass. Naval Ship Systems 
Command. 

14 Litton Systems, Van Viiya, Calif. $8,620,- 
253. Spare parts for tile AN/ASA -27 
computer system for E-2A aircraft. Van 
Nuys. Naval Aviation Supply Office, Phila- 
delphia, Pa. 

17 ~f n o!L J ^ chincl ' y Cor P- Minneapolis, Minn. 
33,832,600. Design & development of tho 
I75mm, 60-eal. gun mount (Mk 1 Mod 00). 
Frldley, Minn. Naval Ordnance Syatems 
Command. 

Akwa Downey Construction Co., Santa 
Barbara, Calif S2.500.000. Construction 
of barracks at the Naval Tra!nin B Center. 
San Diego, Calif. Southwest Div,, Navnl 
Facilities Engineering Command. 
Todd Shipyards, Brooklyn, N.Y. 51,127,020. 
Topside overhaul of the attack transport 
USS Monrovia (APA-31). Brooklyn. In- 
dustrial Manager, fith Naval Dist. 

360,427,810. OV-lOA aircraft Tr "L Ma- 
rine Corps and Air Force, plus lon B lea.l 
time effort for additional aircraft for the 
Marine Corps. Columbus. Naval Air Sya- 
tems Command. 

18 General Electric, West Lynn, Mass 1 
01 0. Spare parts ^for T68-GE-8B licli- 
'nn. Navy Aviation 



s Co., Cleveland, Ohio. 
i, , Bection re n 'r kits for 

tMouB Innding vchiclea (LVTP-6). 
, Clinton, Ohio. Marine Corps. 

19-McDonneU Aircraft, St. Louie. $66,000,000. 



1 ? Corp " J , 

.{'' b rne radar receiver 
. d Baltimore. N avn | Air Syatems Com- 

"Slft'nnn' A r ircrnft ' f, n B Beach, Calif. $S1,- 
600,600 Increased long lead time effort 

Air Systems" Commani " 8 BenCh ' NaVal 

"~l W i Sl !j pya r tla ' Brooklyn, N.Y. SL. 
13213 Itepalra, drydocklnc and Insta1l 

pods 



26 J 



2G 



I?,- 
'kin. 



27 



81 



1 liny tli eon Co., Bedford, MOM. $10. *** 
Kesoarch nnd development on the Bp 
Biiirted missile. IJedfonl, Njivtil Air S 
tenis Com nui n d. 

Intercontinental Mfg. On, (inrlnHi'l. T 
$6,244,000. Ilomb liixlic.'i. (inrlninl. N 
ShipH Paris Control GeiiUr, Miu'him^ik'J' 
Pa. 

American Machine & Foundry O-- Vw 
Pn, 86,849,750. IJdinu bnillc-'J, York. K 
Ships Parts Control CoiiU-r, MwluMUral.-u; 
Tn. 

Toclil Shiiiynrds, Scnlllc!. W*inli. JI.HHM" 
IloKiilnr overhaul of ihu iitlni'k irnnij-r 
USS Picknwny (APA-Maaj, Kcnltli-. If. 
dus.(rinl Manager, ifltli Nnvril Hint- 

4 -LcviiiKHton Shipbuilding Co., Omnnf. Tei 
$8,587,000. ConHlriiuUoii nf twn i-mrnl n 
cort (PI'') vesHi-ls. Ortumi., NJIVJI I -H^ 
Syst.einH Cunuimnd. 

Farmers Tnol & 8ii[iii|y 1'i.rii,, Urf-rmi 
Colo. $1,873,274. \V!ti,[ rui.l r,,]ke.>n ii 
somblies for the Siilnwlndicr 1C! unil rhftL=f' 
ml missiles. Indian IIwil. M!. Nau] 
Proiiollniil Finn!., Imliini Hem), Mrl, 

Giindorson Hrns. Ktwini-erlnji <'.>ri'., t'c-tt- 
Innd. Ore. S-l,2fi9,ur. Aiiruuift nu|-j- II 
patrol liontH (ASP11). I'.n-iriMi.l. Nftvil 
Slut) Sysli>in Comtnimil. 

Jacksonville Shipyard, JnHirumvllJr, I'Ji. 
51,260,000. Topside i-r|.nlr (l ,n! nlUTfl!tn 
of Uio nlttiek aircraft oni-Hri' USH Hurjulx^i 
(OVA- 00). JiidiKoiivllk'. Imhutriiil M(ir.. 
attor, GUI Navnl DlfU. 

'"I' ' 1 ' 1 SliiiiynrilH, San I'mlro, l!i,Uf. Jtl.m,- 
fiBO. DrydoL-ldnit, nKcrjiilini im.l r,-j..-itr c( 
the atfnnlt IMH-KO sliii* U.SK Mknitlt (AKA- 
lOfi), Jinn Pedro. Imlutitriril Mnrmwr, Ihli 
Navnl Dint, 

M.I.T.. GnmliHoV, Mrui:i. $V.V > ri,(Hi'>. JJ- 
slBii, development ami tc.'illiw uf ihi- ri'it*. 
don nnsHilc Kuldnnco nyiiLrm. Cimilrt^s*. 
Siiecinl Propels Olllcc. 

United Aircraft, Prntl J4 Whilnry AfffriN 
vJX 1 ^ I<inBt Hni'tfucel, Conn, (|,i,Hf,7,6JJ. 
JB2-P-BA enftlncs. Knot HnrKunl, M*v*l 
Air SyHtoinu Commiinil. 

Notional Steel & SlilnluJll.tlnu ("o.. .Sai 
Dloiro, Calif. $l,707,BGfl, Ki'itulnr tivi'r'hy1 
of tho ntliicU traiiHiiurt UN.S 1'inil HeviH 
(Al'A-2dH). Sun D|OB. tnrfu'ifrlnl Mr,. 
nucr, llth Nnvnl Dint. 
DoiiHlaa Aircraft, LOIIB Ht-ncli. t:1!l. 
312.GOH. Homh rnckii inu3 iuln,iit.T 
lon-juico, Ciilif. Navnl Air Hynlnn* r^n-.- 
innnil. 

Bendix Corn., Mlslmwnkn, [ml. l*,tiS4.. 
287. Tnlos Hiildimc, nnlmt imil ti\t(nan:t 
iievclopnicnl. MtHliawnlwi. Niivjil (Uitrinnrt 
.SyHtoins Commnnd. 

United Aii-crnft, Pratt K Willing Alrcrtft 
HIV., hast Ilarlfoi'il, Cimn, iii.l&y,!^, 
Sparo jmrts to Hiit>|iurt I'liuliu ..... n Ksil 1 . 
I' 8, A3, A4 nud Afl nircmrt. Km! Hart- 
ford. Nnvnl Aviation tivwly Onin-. 1'hik- 
ilulpliln, Pa. 

Plillco-Foril Corp,, Aoritnulrnnlr DK.* New- 
port Hcnch, Cnlir. Sl,li2.l P 40ll. Arniiiri.rsr* 
for Nnvy uonlu. NcW]nrL HchHi, tltk->rt 
Ship SyntcniH Cotnmnni). 
Koynl rndiiatrles, linnJnecrinl I'rriLlvirl* IHf., 
Allmmbrn, Onllf. $l,80B.Jnu, K|i;rnif 
auxiliary fuel tanlto, Alluiiiili.rn. Nav*f 
Air SyHtoniH Gonimntitl. 

A, C. Hnll Co,, Sim Unrlim, finllf, II.IE.*.. 
10G. Production of roai] wlict'l nnntiHliSIri 
for Marino Corps nni]ililliliin ( r ( 01 1 
fLVTP-5), San Cjirl.iB. Mnriiio Corf-i 
Buiiply Company, Phlln<lol])liln, I'n. 
United Aircraft, Blkornky Altrtl t>l., 
Strntfprd, Conn. Sl.COO.OOO. IiKtca^J 
'one M lcnd time ofTort nnd innd-HM* f*r 
HH~fiSH helicoptei'H for llirj Air t'vttt. 
Stratford. Navnl Air SyRlemn (!i)intnona, 
Bondlx Corp,, Rcll|iao-Ponerr 1)1*,, T*t<r- 
boro, N.J. $0,802,332. H|>nro f>nrH MT.J 
m aupport of tho PUBO nutmiintlc flfjjtl 
control ayntcin on nllaclf nircnifl. Ttitr- 
boro, N.J. and North Hrtllywiwi.l, C.llf. 
Nnvnl Aviation Supply Ofllee, I'Jillmlel^M*, 

Fj' n ncrnI rcioct'Ie. WnahEuKlon, IM!, tj,. 
GBO.OOO. noconditlonlns ftf 2* (iov*rnmtr,li 
turniahed lurblnc-Bencriilor ects, InetLt-lnf 
taKc-rcgiilatlon syatomfl AIM! sjisro PBUI, 
Pltohburg, Mass. Navti] flliiii grtirKii 
t/onimand. 

Gnrrott Corn.. AlReacarcli ttlfg. (,V, J>j 
Angeles, Onlif. $1,003,1168. (Jonipft-ii.^ 
power units nnd related <Hiiil[inwiil, Toi* 
ranee, Calif. Nnvnl Air System* Commmd. 

-Ciirtlss Wright Corp., Wrlffhl AtnnHlttal 
Dlv., Wood-Rldgo, N.J. 3,089,02G. H r * f , 
parU to support JOGW16 englnca for var- 
JOUH aircraft. Wood-nitljre, Nnviil A* in- 
tlon Supply Offlco, Phllndolphln, P. 

~"? n !!i nB Rfldl Co - C^dar HAivl 
?2,080,B78. Dcaiarn, devolopmcnl, 



28 



November 1?66 



tlon BBBombly rind t.>:itliiK of n Uimy mil.- 
system. Ufdiii' K'U'lilii. Nowimrt, Hi'iu'h, 
Cnllf i* '"I Hli'hiiriliinn, Tex. Nuwil Oi-d- 
nnnco Lnlionilory, Hllvor Miirlmt, Mil. 

-Sparry Knud Corp., Ilnlvnr lHv.. Si, I'uul, 

Minn. S1.777,lilH>. Avinnl timinih-i'ii. SI. 

Paul. Nuvnl Mr Hyiilr'Hiti i'liiimiiiiid. 

Hitt'rk Corp., IliiiiHiiiflon Mint (on, N.Y. 
S] UIH.'IOH Hllll*!)' lilnMliiK iiynlcinri. Ilimllinr- 
to'n Hlfitlini. Nnvnt Shiji ."iynli-niit ('inn- 

I" 1 " 1 '' ,, i 

-LTV At-riiJipni'o Corp.. Awiiiiuilirri Dlv,, 

Dnllmi, Ti-x. JID.MV.lllll), N.ni-r irilnit 

effort rind limit l>'ii<I limn iiiiilrrlul mill 
effort In |iri'|iiirnlhm for 1 iinnlm-l Inn of 
A7I) nin-rnf(, fur tin- Air Kinv,.. llnllim. 
Nnviil Air iiyntvinti Comnuiiul. 



AIR FORCE 

3 Hnyllienn (!IK, Wiillluim. Miimi, Sl.lKlli.mm, 
Kli'dnm tnl.i'ii. WiiKlinrn, Wni'iu>r>ltiil>liin 
Air Miiti.'Hi'l Arm. (AFI,<!), Kiililiiii Al-'li, 
(In. 

AltnnHr Kiwnrch Corp.. fJinumu, Cullf. 
$3,8tll,IMl!, A I r.' ruH llriivii. Nuninin, HIT- 
tk'11 Air Mnlitrli'l Arm, (At''l,<!). Hill Al-'M. 
(Ilnli. 

-North Amcrldin Avliillun, AiinliHin, Cnllf. 

$1,8(11,1111. Ilium. imrlu fur Mi.< Mimii.<. 

mini Wi'ii|nm ityiilnn, Aiii<lii>lin, flilum Air 

Mnli'Hi'l Aim, (Al>'[,<!|, Mill AIM, Illiili 

4-Wnlli>r Klddti A CM., llnrhniil.. ll.illf, SI,, 

0116, 1 M. Minimi-Ill Inn l.f III.' iH'Vi ....... r] 

(Win HI iiyitli'iii df Mm F in 1 ,! nlivriifi, Mm 1 - 
linuli. Hun Anhnil'i Air Miih-rli-1 AIVH, 
(AFLC). Ki'Ny AMI. Tfx. 

--AVCO Corp., Kvi'i-.'ll, Mmui, ? l.ililil, linn, 
Wnrli mi 11 iTwiin-li iiroiirmn, Kwi't-H 
Hfilllnllii Hyiilcmsi IHv,, (A KM!!). Niii'lnn 
AK1I, Cnllf. 

Un I Ifil Alrrrnft, Kim! Hnrtfunl, Cimn 
$2,81(7,2(17. ilimri) t'rln fur J 1.7 nln-n.fi 
oiiltln<>n, Muitl IJiirtf.'1-il. ,'tnn AniunUi Air 
Mntcrlt'l Arm, (AI''I,<!1, K.-lly Al-'ll, 'iv. 
6~-(Hln Mil I Ilk-mi n Clioinlrnl I'cirti.. Nmv Yt.rli 
C!f(y. N.Y. ?;!.r ( r.!(.:!:|.|. |>n.it>-lln ..f furl 
fnr TITAN inlnnllrn, Miillvlllf, V. Him 
Anliinln Air Mitlcrlrl Aivn, (Al'l.in. 
Kelly Al'II, T.-x, 

"-(JiniKiilliliilt'il Dlrnt'l Mlrrlrtr ('(>., Mtumf.n'il, 
Clillll. (l,7tM.Hrt. I'r.iiliK-lliiii uf i.lfi-lriritl 
[(cimrnlni'ii mill ri'lnti'il i<iiiil|>in>'iM. ,'lim-ti- 
tun, Ciillf. [I ..... 'uinciihi Air MnH'i-lfl A ten 
JAI''I.(1). M.'l!llliui AMI. Calif, 

({(HHlycitr Afniiiiint'c Curii,, Alin.u nlilo 
tn,M(l,llim. I'ni.lni-ll ...... r Mr HIIM|".||U|.|M 

liluitiiKnti'lili' Inliiinilorli'ii, AliU'ti. Arri-. 
nniilli'iil HyN'iii!i IHv. (AK'KM, Wclulii 
l'n(ti>nti>n AMI, Ulili<, 

--Sn*rry Itiunl fnr(i.. Clii.r|..lf.ivlllo, VH. 
(1,7711,5(1.1, )'r<i<|iii'llnii i.f tilrluMiif rmlnr 
liii' C I III) niiil C 111 iili'i'inn. rhurl^ltM. 

T'J'^.iy'V,, .V',"""" 1 ''" 1 "vi.'t..ii lH,v,. 
(AI'HII), Wrl|thl..)'nilt-ni,,ii AI-'H, Ul.l,, 
utliiilrnl Mi-nnnri-niont Curii,. Mnniti Ann 
(nllf. H.Oiiri,7-HI. friNliirlUiH .,f i..|..|n..|rv 
(lliililny nyrilt-mn. I Inn in At ..... Mr |'W.-.. 

Wnlt-rii 'IVnt ItniiK,., Vititilrii|,..rK AMI. 
t-nllf. 



,.. 

t. I'n.ilin'tli.ii ,,f ii 

m', ,","(-, J " 1 ''" . Alt ' 
.d), Hill AMI. Uln)i. 



, , -n 

J- M nlritrnfi ctmlitrrt, j.; w ,,| || n ,.|(, hr< t, linn 

' rl< '' *"" (A|l<ll( 



CMP., llMicmi..wn. Mil. 
., r.iiliii-il.i.t t,t Btr.-infr. fn,-l 
tnnk iinil <iriliinn> i-ylun Kav mMI^, 
IlHKgnttiwn. HiicrHhiriiiM Air Mwirrlrl 
Ar. AI.'MU, MrdMlBH Al-'ll. r (l ||f. 
Mn ji* 1 " 1 ?'"' llll ,'"*| | ll". Ili-t. II.H7.- 
lnn ili>vi<l<.i<iii>'iil ..rk 



'ii AMI. 
rul K 
jrp., Dctruli, 

., 

?, 1 "Vwlt-mrt IHv,. 
4'Bt[t>rfl..n AKIl. Oh!.., 



rntlon 



, 



,f 

Mn, 



A^n.nwmlrttl 



I,!',', 1 ,','.''' 11 ' 1 '" 1 HiilHritlc Syiitcnm Dlv 
i ) '* I i J '"' l " Tl Al ""- '. 
7KI 1 - i"r' A .Y t ' r { in ', < ' lllvi)r City, Cnltf. Si!,- 
,, ,,i " ' i ' n " lllt "l"ii ,"f modification hits 
ami riin!iii'<>i-!Mn -vliu'ii for Taclliml Air 

iiyiili'iiui, I,M;I Anici'lm, Onllf Wni-nm 1 
AVVr'fin' 1 ' Mllll ' rM A n '' u ' <AKLC), KoMnii 

''"'''''"'"t'jl Avinllon & Knulncrrlmr ,;,., 

Moll, Ml.-),. aMHIi.iisn. I'n.durliim of 
J "iiKlm'!. f;r 'I !17 nlrnn.fl. ToWn 

1 Ho A.Tonmitlnil Myiiliu,,!, ])| v <AI<'MC) 

Wrliilii-l-iilli-r AMI, l)|,| ( , ' " vlf>l ' ) - 

M"!.'" ,, Al ' r """ H " l ' rit li'ini.rutory, HinTalo 

",-\- , s A 1 "' 1 '" 11 "-, A.i"iy.ii..H.,.i':vi,,,,S; 



. .iini...,,. M,I. ?a> . 

f. r Jli,'. r'Mi"'!!!'" 1 '''""'""""'ill V'-itram 
"i nit' l nil nlrrriift ,,,, (t ,., iniii,,,,,,, 

l".llM. A..i-, l iiniill,'. l | Hy.iti.nm Dk., A FH V 
WrUtl.l-l'iHij.nHH, AMI, ()],!. " 1Ai ""' 
rm-M.rnl An- rl( f( MnrlHiii. (!. $8,000, 

"" '." I' 1 "' "' IHMIH) i.livrHfL. M ' 

>v ll i A ','!'""" l " lnl1 Myiiti-iHFi IHv., (AI<'H 
W|;tKlil. lMll.-r..,.ii AMI, OH,,. ' ' AIH1 '1- 

n Mi'im W n p|r . lr ' "- K " min " l ' l( .v. M". SV 
"V 11 " 1 ' >' Moil of iiln'riift roiniiuin - 

" 1|I ;V" I I 1 "!" 1 "" K<inn (lltv. An. 

i:: 11 - (A ' ); Wriid ' 1 - 



'.|uli 

Mm 

Hi 

Inn, 
.ill 
I In 
llrni 

iUfi. 
I'l'Uft 

Ar 



'i''- Ilnllinmt-!.. (Hilnhmmi'V'Ilty ""Air 
)!.. Ar.;n. I AFl.(l). Tliik.-r AKH, (lltlu 
'!', '""' l ,!'!' 1 ' 1 ' "lvar Dlv,, Wmihlnit- 

"-' ?;!,I.:!',!.IH. I'nniliiin,! of mi - 
i' ';v"t.-mn irtl.;n. N.Y. :>V(l(Mh Air 

VM'if, WrlMlil-Piitti-rmm A Fit, Olil,,. 
II* t orp., <l..nih n.,,,,1, !,(_ ji;,..^ 

llvili-iinlli- aiinciitlilliTt fnr I' H)fi t i| r . 
.Ai'W;,;^!! A ( ;!jf'j,,{f """" 



"liimliilh.H tntlnrr innt rt'lnlnt ^ulimii'iit. 
Vi' 1 , 1 ,; 1 !" 1 ' ,., Afrnntniilfrtl ilyitlrnm IMv., 

MI { i ,i!', JJ"; Kl'l-1'nMiT.n AMI. Ohhi. 

l.l I'ftlrHUM lllllrr Cnrii.. liny,,]],.,',-, ]! N Y 
fl.O/Milli. l'r.,,1,11-11 ...... f ,, I1V |, ..... ,,] 

(t.iiln.l nynirmh, f,.,. \r ^ y . M | ,( ],- lnr , 
nlivriif . Hii Vl >li..n-. Mmi Ant.nli Air Mn- 
li-rlnl Atyit, (AM-l't. KHIy AMI. Tex. 

jV/'lX 1 ;^"^" 1 , l '" r ."" MmTftiiifiii.i. CMIf. 
?.lri,.u/.ft,t!1. I'r.iiliiril.ni i.f tlitiKi* II Mlimlc. 
i.inn nilhi.il,. niuti.in. tliii-niii>riil<i. Ilnlllii- 
tli^,\votM,i.. Hlv,, (AK-IC), Nurliiu AMI, 



^. Midi, 



13 j.enUttll.,m 



iyun. 



IV l.rnr Ml^ftltr. litr.. (Jnii.il 

*l, ( lM,iMi, Aln'-rnfl . 

".mini l(ni.|ih>, Arn.iiiiHtlcnl Hyfi>nin Dlv.. 
lAl'.'lf), WrlHhl.riitli-rm.il AMI, Olilo, 
dnliril Alr.'rnft, Kitm Uiinfmil. C.mn. 
8l.i:':i.r.;ill, !l|.r,. imrhi /, U -niflti ,.,,. 
I'liii'.ici.ilnu nhvrnfi mtuliint. Miint Ilnrl- 
f.-nl. Mini Ant. .ill.. All- Miitcrlrl An'ii. 
lAI H'l. K,.ll v Al'll. T.-x. 

lit l^ncrnl Hh-rirli'. I'lilln.lrli.liln, I'd. 85,- 

tii'. H / 1 , fit 'irtin-ll mill lll'Vrlntimi-nt (m 

MAltK I!! CfcMlry iiniurnnm. I'lidiiili'lnlilii. 
ltll(!)tlri .'I^trinii IHv,, (At-'MO). Norton 
A I'll, t nlif. 

Hmurni-rtplflirr I'll., Ml Mi.nt.'. tliillf. (l,. 
OVli.lC'fi. l't..ilu,-ili.ii ..f tilriTfifl tiiiniliii, J,it 
Ilrilitft. Cnllf. n u i|,-,i Air Mntrrli'1 Art'ii, 
(Al l.t'i. Hill AMI. lllnli. 
A, IJ. Hrliinuitalntr CH,, .Hnnnnlllt), Cnllf. 
il.ll'r'U.Mi'j. I'Mnlm'tlMi i,f hrnvy tluty cli-o- 
Irh'nl lirnnrnii.rfi. MnnnitllKi. MArrnninnto 
Afp Mnti-rli'l Arm, (AKl.C). MdlMlim 
AI'H, ('itllf, 

tinpr| i;icftrlr, Wwt I.ynn, MIINM. (!, 
7fi;!.lllin. I'niiliirllon i.f JKA (IK-IS enrfneu 
tr I-' r.A nlrcrrtft, Writ Lynn, AIT ..... mil- 
ml H)ni)'i<i! lllv.. (AKHIl), Wrlulit-I'dikT- 
n.n A I II, llMi.. 

-,!ll II. I', t.'nutlrlrlt (! Akron, dlil.i. tl.Ollfl.. 
'/flft, I'nulii'-Uipii i.f wlici-l iiHiiPihlillcii fur 
M ft'J rtliTt'nfl, Trt.y. Oliln, Oaik-n Air 
Ml.-f( P | Arm, (AM.tl). Hill Al-'ll, Iltnli. 
N'ntlli Amnrlran Avhtlun. AnnliHm, ('nllf, 
(l,inii',(i!i|], M n |iii^iinnrii niul mmllllcnU'm 
>f MhtiKfiiiAn rtilnll(? Kul'lfiirt) mill control 
tiiiil|.nifiil Atmoflni. lliilHntli! KynU-niN 
IHv., lAFHt!). Nurlon AMI, IWIf. 
AmrrlcAn Klfrtrk. Inc., I'nrHininuit, (Inllf. 
JV.4UH.sai). rrttilirrtltut of Hln-rnft iKimbn. 
tt fltul HI I'ftjnu, t'llf, Oifiltin Air 
Arfa, MKI.H). Hill AM), Din I), 
KUclrlr. f'lvftrnUle, Ohio. !-(,fifll ( . 
afill, l-'ArlllliKi ("(iiBiifihiii in Hiit<iHirt of tlio 
J-1B t;n(flnp uriiftrnm. Kvtrrnlnlc'. Acrunnu- 
rs| Hymrnw Dlv., lAKHO), 
son AHl. Ohio, 



!! Crime Co., Durbnnk, Cnlif. $1,700,000. 
Iroductloii of modification kltn for tho 
lj-iao aircraft nnti-iildd brnko system. 

,,. Al ' eft . (AFI.C), Robins AFH, Gn. 

,-a Mpcrry llnm! Corp,, Great Neisk, N.Y. $1 - 
'j!MOO. Oi-mind iiujiiiort equipment for 
animrrii! LOHAN nriviitntional sots. Grent 
Nock Aeronautical Sysloma Dlv., (AFSC). 
Wrljtht-I'nltei'Hon Al-'H, Ohio. 

i n"rr J-^ l 't!! ll< i nl Cor|1 " ""'Klinm, Utah, 
51,u;r.,(,07. I)c!il K n, fabrlcalloii nnd touting 
Hi i t inmt vrator control Bystam for n 
ir.fi-incli ,m ,i riinkct motor. llri K hnm. 
AKH Cnllf Ceiitci-, Edwarda 

l!fi -L. T. IndiiHtrleii, Inc., Dallna, Tex. $3,230,- 
'1110. Proiluclion of alrcrnft liomblet dla- 
IK'iiHisrH. Diillni), Acroiiaullcal Syotemn 
v (AI'SO), WrlKht-I'nttomon Al^B, 
Ohio. 

-North Amcrlcnn Avlntlnn, LOB AnBelen, 
Cnlf. SI.Bia.HOO, Production of mdnr 
cinilpjnoiit for F-100 rilrcraft. Lou 
AiiKi'li-!!. Hnci-innunlo Alt- Mnlorlol Area, 
(AFT.C), McClellan AFH, Cnllf. 

-Miirlln-Mnrlettn Corp., Dniivor, Colo, $2,- 

<i!l7,inv. rrinliu-.llon of njmro narlti for tho 
Illiui III inliuillii iiyiitom. Walerlon, Colo. 
Oftdon Air Mnlorlcl Area, (AFI.O), Hill 

'.!(! llnrchi'H Alrcrnft, Culver City, Calif. ?2,- 
mi(l,()IIU. Triilnlnit <!t|iili>m!iit and datn ro- 
i'l 11 !' t ?., "' ''' al< ' lln ii'-(-alr mliifillo. 
('iilvci 1 (,lty. At'ronnnllnnl SyBloms Dlv., 
(AFHC1), Wrislit-Pntlimioii AFH, Ohio, 
('(iiitlnriilnl Aviation & Engineering Corp., 
Ui'lroil, Mich. $1,.14,(I01. 1'roducLloii of 
J-dll 1-HKlrii'ii fnr Army Imllcoiitcni. Toledo, 
Ohio. Ai'ronniitliTnl SynleiiiH Div., (AKHO), 
\VHithl.PnUornon AKH, Ohio. 
-(ieneral lilcrlrln, Went Lynn, Mana. $1,- 
IDa.dlH. Spans ]iiirt:i for tlm H -G2 liydran- 
lln iiynleni. WCM(, Lynn. Oklahoma City 
A r Mali;ril Area, (AFLC), Tinker AFH, 
Ok ]. 

Culnmbln Ilnlvcraltv, Now York City, N.Y. 
S'l.HOK.SJ'll). Htinlii'ii of ncnaora upiillcnbla 
lo ItSKM ti-njeiitory. Now York City. Air 
f-'Di-i-t) Ollliii! nf Hflltmtlllc lloflwirch. 

'.!'/ Tallinn Pi|io. Inc., nnd llio Nnrwalfl fltccl 
(-'., Uli'hniini.l, Vn. ?1,<MI,|]HO. Proiluc- 
Iliui of incliil rcvi-lmoiilii for aircraft l>ro- 
livtion, Itlfilimnnd. Aenninutlonl Syatcmn 
lljv.. (Al'SIl), Wrlithl-l'ntk-rHon AFH, 
Ohio, 

lliiloHvllIo MfR. Co., Ciimdon, Ark. f2,- 
IHH.IKHI. I'niilucUon of dlaiioniioru for 
liiiinlilDhi. Cmmlon. Aoninnutlfltil Hyulcmn 
D v,. (AKHO), Wrlijhl-l'aUaraon AFH, 
Ohio. 

Doll IndiiNtrlcn, Waycnma, (!a, $1,278,366. 
I'roitin-Hon of in'iuMli'o hnmliii. WnycroBB. 
Oinlnn Air Materiel Area. (AFLO), Hill 
AMI, (I... 

r'nlrchllil Hillcr Corn., Ht. AiiKiiatlno, Fin. 
!!l,IU!l!,17fl. InnptK't.lon nnd ropnlr of (MHO, 
lid I HI) and WO lilt) aircraft. Ht. I'titem- 
\ima> Kin. \\'at'iH'i'-Hol)]nn Air Matorlol 
Ar.'ii, (Al'1,1)), Itiihinti AKH, fin. 

Hynttiinn Dovi<loptiu<nl Corp., Hinitn Monkn, 
Calif. S'.!,0(IO,(HIO. PniPiircnimit of Hiitolllto 
I'onli'dl ninnnitifr nyiileniH. flan t a Monlcn. 
Air Forn^Hiilitllllf) Control Fdcllity, Loa 

1!H North Anu'rlrnn Avinllon, 1 ,011 AnKolos, 
Calif. $'I,711,1M. I'rocuromont of pylon 
nn!i(fiiil)H('H for F 100 nirerafl. Lou AnKotoa. 
HaitrnineiiU) Air Mntcrlol Area, (AFLO), 
MeClnllnn AKH, Cnllf. 

Hpcrry Itnnd Corp,, Wnnhin([ton, D.C). |4,- 
SOO.Iilifi, I'roilncllon of compnlor oyulcnin. 
llllca, N.Y. WrlKht-Pullei'Bon AFI1, Ohio. 

ill llnclnu Co., HcnlUo, Wnnh. $t>,()00,QOO. 
Modlllcatlon nnd updntliiK of tho Mlnnto- 
iniu) nilnHllo syHluni. Choyanno, Wyo,; 
Kuiild City, H.I). ; nnd Mtnnt, N.I). nalllu. 
UP HyHtcnm Dlv., fAFSO), Norton AFH, 
Onllf. 

Synlemtt Devtluuniflnt Corp., Snntn Monica, 
Otillf. $'i,nfin.O()U, (lompntcr programmlnK 
Hi'i'vlcoH fin' Uio Air DofeiiHO aynlom. Sanln 
Monlcn. KIcclnmlcN Syutcma Div., (AFSC), 
L, (i. HniiKcom Flold, Mniw. 

Tpxn Inntrnnictil, Inc., Dnllnn, Tox. $1,- 
(IRC,!IOO. Production of aimro imrta for 
UK- 40 aircraft. Dnllnn. Aeronautical Sya- 
tern* Dlv., (AFHO), Wriitht-Pntlorflon AFD, 
Ohio. 



Corp., Dnllna, Tex, $1,670,087, Pro- 
duction of Jet aiiKlno teat Htmula. GnrlnnO, 
Tex. ftncrnmonto Air Mntorlol At-on, 
(AFLO), McOtollan AFH, Cnllf. 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 2O3O1 



POSTAGE AND FEES PAID 



OFFICIAL BUSINESS 



University of Colorado Scientists 
To Investigate UFO Reports 

i .u J} ni rsit y of Colorado, Boulder, Colo., has been selected 
by the U. S. Air Force to conduct independent investigations into 
unidentified flying object (UFO) reports. 

A research agreement, valued at approximately $300,000, is 
being negotiated with the university by the Air Force Office of 
scientific Kesearch to analyze phenomena associated with UFO 
sightings and to make recommendations on the Air Force's 
methods of investigating and evaluating UFO reportsa program 

u!ri!VFo 1C ein eC ear1r- 0kl A "^ * 6XPeCted to be made to 



Condon 



Other Diversities to take 



Army To Improve 

Pershing Mrssiio 

System 

The U. S. Army MisstJcCois. 

mancl has begun a projcriun b 
improve the design iind in- 
crease the rate of fire ami re- 
liability of its Perslmiff mfoik 
system. 

Under the improvomcnt pro- 
g-ram, known as PprsliiiiK lA r 
ground support equipment nsd 
in the countdown and launch 
of the missile will tnfcc on a 
new look, but thp 84-font-lon^ 
missile will remain 



P rce ' * 



and findings of Project 5 Bin T R n l r f "je i-esources, methods 
recommended ^. 1 e board 



States. The 



of the 



The most noticeable oulwnrd 
chang-e will be the shift from 
tracked to wheeled vehicles for 
transporting- the missile system. 
Reason for the change is to re- 
duce vibrations of equipment 
during' cross-country movoment 
and to reduce cost uslnff the less 
expensive wheeled models wlifch 
require less maintenance. 

There will be four firing bat- 
teries in a Pershing 1 1A battalion. 
A battery will have several mis- ; 
siles, each on an improved em- 
tor-launcher mounted on a flat- 
bed semi-trailer truck. The two 
solid propulsion stages and the 
guidance and control section will 
be carried fully assembled with 
the warhead section on the same 
vehicle. The improved prt> 
grammer test station/power sta- 
tion, radio terminal set and new 
firing battery control center will 
be hauled on five-ton trucks. 



Gets Subcontract for Army 



An employment training center for the menially retarded him 
become a defense Huboontraetor through the ellort.", ol I lie I IS. 
Army Tank-Automotive Center (ATAC), Warren Mich. 

New UomoiiH of Oakland County, Inc.. located HI Koyal Oak. 
Mich, han boon Hcloclod to package innull compoiienl,'i lor I'jirk 
Industries of Mclvindalo, Midi,, as part of the lirm'a work nn n 
$100,000 contract to product; (told boater Hit for ATAC. 

A nationally recognized Lraininr; institution fur Ihe mentally 
retarded, New Hoit/onH contacted ATAC early lhi;i year IW ji;i 
Histanco in obtaining work for iUs trainee:;. All small hiriiiH'-iu niir 
trucks lot by ATAC after that time wore m-reoiied in .-ii'iuvh nf 
work which could hi! done at New llori/ona. 

Park Industries beoime interested in tho project ;uid worked 
out an agreement with Now linri/oiiM for parkajiinjv work in put I 
of its A'l'AC contract. 

Now JIori'/onH in u wimmunlly orjvani/idion devided In the erea 
tiou and operation of wnrk-trninlinv ('enters for tin 1 mentally re 
tarded of Oakland (!ounty, Mich. 

Durinj? the 20 montlis it ha;i been in opi'nitinii, New IInri/'ii:i 
lias handled over $25,000 in uoal.mrl.s from IniMiness ;iiul iiuliintry. 
So far, 1.8 trainees have been placed in fulMimu 1'inplnyiin'iit with 
private companies, UHUIK Uio wklllti (hey Icarneil nt New l|uriv;oir>. 

University of Illinois Site for Army 
Engineer Construction Research Lab 

The University of lllinoiti han been neliN'ted iei (lie .-ith* of a m-w 
coiiHtructlou enK'ineeriii) 1 , 1 nvutinrli biborjihtrv ti In* upended liy 
the Army ('orp.s of Knjaneoiu Selei'tioii of HliiKiin win mmie nflrr ' 
atudy of proiionalH made by :!() niuviiUM'rinir iK'hutila and iniivriif i"< j 
in runpoiiKU to un invitation by Hie Cur|t:i nf KnKhieiiiM, 

The new facility will b oonMtniclod Ity tlie Univnroily of lllinni:. t 
and leaned to tho Corps of Miifani'eivi which will nin-rutc 11, The ! 
laboratory IH oxpoeUwl Lo hoH'in operaliunn in niid-UHW. Un aiuuutl ' 
budjfotwill be abinitlf!ir> million. \ 

IManninir for tho OMlalihahmont of tlie hdniralttry IM'KMH a yt-ui ( 
apro when it wan dolm-mined (hid, itniiMlntr.llim ivu-un-' 
ntonta oxccodod capahllitioH of Uio Curp:,' e>ci:itinK lit 
Itupid advanccH in techmdoKy and more Mlrlnticnt tlt-i 
performunco nf faeilitien required for nnwlnwlloii pn' i :t'iil 
lems rcQiiirinif incrcaHod (utnstnuiion n'Meuwli, 

Broad ureas of vosoarch to ho carried out by (he mw labor 
include HtudyiiiK wayn to Hpiieil i\w appliruUiin of tin* \I\\M\ 
fltrucWon toclnudoKyr dovolopiiuc mor itnun^Mtilvdi ron-an 
policies and in'OccdurwH, and Koeluiitf imithoihi fi 
carrying out lon^-ran^e t'onntrtiction rencarch |ir.. r 
ffations will embrace Much divorso arean of ultidy 11- 
nlquea, environmental control, hardened power plani, 
and research in enhancing tho wtheUc values oC Nlniclun'H innl 
pronorvinff natural beauty with nian-mado dtmlKit. 

A committco of H]iecia)iMw from Uio HnlhlhiK HcHWUTh Advlwon, 
Hoard, undor n contract with the National Acadumy of Hcit-nwt iV 
aasiatm tho Corpa in phmnuw iU lonK-rniwc coiutlnu-liuii Ve 
search program. 



The Christmas art o tho cover of thlu JHHUD IH by John K, fn, 
Graphics und Prcfientutton Branch, Ottta of the Secretary of J)e- 
rcnse. 




I'uhlliilicil Ity MM' 
uf Di'fn 
Him, Unlii'il M, Mt- 

Nt-rrnlury <tf \Wtmt 
linn. ( '. i int It, \~iuirr 

I't'imly Si-rri'lury of Dtf 
Hull, .\i Hint' SylviM,i(. r 



(1'nlillr A 

Col. Jurl II. Sltiphfini, USA 
Ulicvtiii 1 fur Ciiiiiiiiiinlly 

('ill. iMlttlll ('. (HlniMll, USA 

Clili-f, lliKjIui-ii-i .'i I.iitutr Dlvihlun 

1'illt.u' U'.lr. 1C. W. llriitirtinKUHK 
Ai.-Hif. I'dilui- . MI'n. (Vclllii t'ollak 
Amur. l>:<lliur Mr. Hick I,H I'nlte 

t 
K. Wiirni. JOI, U8N 



Ttin y'f/r'O'fi- I I'.'itiuti'it /(til/rlin 
|-i |ni1ili"ti'-(t tn'titiltly !>y tin' lliiniiic.'j 
f, 1 uli.ii- Ihvl-rami, hhvi-ttii'ulfl for 
t "iiUlliLliliilV lirhlll'iHd, t Mllctt (if (111) 
sliiMl ;'r % ii'h\rv 'if |l|'fi'ii:i.i (I'uti- 
irsiti-.t. I'll- lit fiuiilii for jn'iiil!iij[ 
Inililii nl, ("it w;i;t ii|iphivt'i( lij' tllO 
-loi ,,r (tn- lliir.-HU .if HIM llt|(l(,'fi 

v pin j.-, ;i( . ..f tin- llnllvlin Is 
ivc it ti tn'-iiip: uf rnmn 



nt I'iM'dii'il iiml nth<T 
h. It will fii-rve us 

nil y ('uliri'i'liillK fllll' 
ijiKintii innl imilorli', 
niiiuiitutt- t)inii|(lil liy 
ji''i!tt.'i,-, . f tin- iti'fnni'' imltihtry (em 
HI ^i.lviii^ Un- |.r.il>t>-Hi<i Hmt niiiy iirlse 
Us ^iHHhuc III*- M'.jtili'i'tni'iilM of lli 
Mult. 

Mnti-llul III Ul" llnllftitl t H; 



ilflh 



l'-';;! t-i til 



i'il in fnhirc 
.iniV.i M Oi 
ivl??|nti, 

Tim 



fnmt hiilusir|f 
lo tin w- 
iM tm for- 
ft I.flt' 



nf 



(n 



fttt'l l-i HHPiH-lfB nf 
"f ['cffufif, Army, Nnvv 
Air Kr*v, HiH|iit-ai for ru|tli' nhn 
- Hi(i|rfinl (M HIP JliminniN A Ui r 
. ttAHDtl'A), <wm 2K813, 



- 
K-270II. 

may 



fr^ly wUhnut 
of Uio 




by 
Lt. Gen. W. A. Davis, USAF 



The Total Package Concept (TPC) 
is likely to be applied to a large num- 
ber of select programs in the years 
ahead and will have certain impacts 
on present Air Force and other Gov- 
ernment agency management systems. 
Thus TPC needs to be clearly under- 
stood not only by military managers 
but throughout industry, 

TPC, as conceived by the Air 
Force, envisions that all anticipated 
development, production, and as much 
support of a system as is feasible 
throughout its anticipated life, is to 
be procured as one total package and 
incorporated into one contract con- 
taining price and performance com- 
mitments at the outset of the acqui- 
sition phase of a system procurement. 

Stated simply, TPC looks at the 
procurement process in the same way 
that the Air Force has long looked 
at a given major system as a total 
package rather than as a series of 
"black boxes" or as a sequence of rel- 
atively independent stages. In fact, 
our ability to apply TPC steins from 
the fact that we have been managing 
systems programs as total systems for 
many years, 

TPG requires at least two basic 
conditions: 

It must bo possible to define the 
performance requirements for a given 
system in detail and with a high de- 
gree of accuracy. 

The major technology needed 
muat bo in hand. 

TPG calls for a straightforward 
job of engineering development. If 
the system cannot be denned with a 
high degree of detailed accuracy, a 
sufficiently deflnitized contract for 
TPC cannot be developed. Moreover, 
if the technology is not substantially 
in hand, the risk is simply too great 
to allow for a fixed price. If a fixed 
price ia not obtainable, TPO cannot 
be applied and, as a result, there is 
no total package procurement. 

The C-BA, which met the criteria, 
was the first procurement under TPC. 
It has been estimated that as much 
as SO percent of the program for the 
first seven years is being bought un- 

Defenie Industry Bulletin 



der a single binding fixed-price in- 
centive contract. The contract covers 
all the engineering development and 
production of the system including 
support such as ground equipment, 
spares, training devices and contractor 
technical support. A very important 
fact is that the single contract con- 
tains price, performance and schedule 
commitments for the whole system 
from the start of acquisition. 

Under the stage-by-stage, or se- 
quential, method of procurement we 
generally start by buying only about 
20 to 25 percent of a program the 
development portion. Then follow-on 
production contracts are awarded for 
training, spares, etc. This approach 
has been dictated by a number of 
large systems programs in which de- 
tailed definition was not possible in 
the early stages, where technology 
was not in hand, and where the risk 
was simply too great. 

Under the sequential approach 
there is the hazard of so-called "ice- 
berg procurement." Simply stated, 
when we initially contract for the de- 
velopment program, we are buying 
only the top of the iceberg. Then we 
may find that we are in a solo-source 
position with the development con- 




Lt. Gen. W. A. Davis, USAF, is Vice 
Commander of the Air Force Systems 
Command, Andrews AFB, Washing- 
ton, D. C, He has held prior assign- 
ments in AFSC as Commander, Aero- 
nautical Systems Div., 1961-1962; and 
as Commander, Ballistic Systems Div., 
1962-1964. 



tractor for follow-on, or the under- 
water portion of the iceberg. 

This means that there is real com- 
petition for a relatively small portion 
of 'the program. In the case of some 
of our past programs this had tended 
to prompt unrealistic estimates dur- 
ing the early competition. There is 
ample evidence that, during some de- 
velopment competitions, contractors 
have tended to overstate estimates for 
performance and understate probable 
costs. The estimates for final produc- 
tion systems have also tended to be 
optimistic. Estimates of this kind 
have generally been budgetary esti- 
mates that are not contractually bind- 
ing. 

The bulk of these optimistic esti- 
mates have been due to a lack of 
adequate definition or the right kind 
of data, but some of the optimism has 
been the product of a deliberate effort 
to "buy-in." 

One point should be made very 
clear. The sequential method has 
worked well in the past and, of ne- 
cessity, will be applied to programs 
in the future. In some cases, it is the 
only avenue open to us. Careful ne- 
gotiation, competent exercise of man- 
agement control, and constant vigil 
can largely overcome the hazards in- 
volved. 

TPC represents another and a very 
effective way to overcome the haz- 
ardswhere it can be applied. It is 
a very good approach to reduce pro- 
gram cost and schedule overruns. 
The following measures are applied 
under TPC: 

Competition is broadened to cover 
the entire system package and not 
just the initial stages. 

Discipline in the areas of defini- 
tion and estimating are greatly tight- 
ened during competition. 

A fixed price is established dur- 
ing competition which becomes bind- 
ing on the selected contractor. 

These measures could lead to some 
real savings in programs where they 
can be applied. They should definitely 
result in fewer surprises in terms of 
overruns. 

It is true that TPC provides a solu- 
tion to the problems of iceberg pro- 
curement. However, TPC also raises 
some problems, namely; 

The problem of "disengagement." 
This term simply means the degree to 
which the military divorces itself 
from detailed management. 

The problem of inhibited tech- 
nological innovation. 



1 



Tlio problem of diK(ui|;;ai;<>m<Mit In 
enpedally tliorny. Wo ruconniwd lhin 
whon wo ((mbrnwd incniilEvi!! cniitriK't.- 
ing' nmny ytmrii ago. Tin! problem 
hccomoH moi't! acuto undnr TL'C, On 
tho 01 ui nido, under Tl'(! eon(nirt.or:i 
niuat have uKHtmlially a frcn hand. On 
thfi oilier Hide, tho military ttjintmt 
abrogate omplnt.<!ly its) reiiponiiihlli- 
tlen. Jt iti l-rue that i\ conl.nu'tor tuny 
tfo broke if l> fuiln lo inert lihi down- 
slntiun eimtviuitual eoiiimitini'iilit. 'I'lilu 
would tin no convolution lo the mill" 
Inry if l,h<! nytfti'in ordrivd nimply did 
not mofit the e.'itnblliilied rniniivmenlH. 
Tlnitt could have u jjravi! itii|nii!l nn 
mit.ionnl mieurity. 

.Ho wo iMUinot miy to d ciinlraelor, 
"Wiill, hern in the nmtniet. Conn 1 
htick to nn in live yeurn or MI with 
the) product, und Kood h"'!*." hintt'iul, 
wo will liii lonkttiK "Vi'i* Lin- innid'iii 1 - 
Idr'ii iihoulilc] 1 inul will hifiint un iuii|i!ii 
vtnlliility HO thai wo run ln In if 
. Thin in Uir lu-ynloiH' l.u n 
L iiynUMn Tor luliil |nu'kuj',<> 
t -tlin aliilily In Jiti'ji In 
if ni^'dcd iniiliuul tif diiy-ttMlny imr 
in (Icliiiliul nmiiuK (t u' |l "t- 
him Imon mmir intsaindci'- 
"11 thi:i point, DiumK'iK"' 
mont dor!i mil iiiciui tlint, Om mllitnry 
or {ioviu'imii'iil. nm'iuiy iilvrn up r*m 
Ind, It niniply 1111^:11111 tliat wo il> HO( 
l[ot involvi'd in di'tnlli'il niEuiiijiH'nn'iil 
unlonn \vi\ luivti to, \V(i will nmnllnv 
very dciHiily, WH will nlt'p in IT \vn 
luivn to, niul wn will vrtulii tlio rli-flit 
of control. 

Tliovofori 1 !, tho proMoiu of <llimn* 

{fn^OIIII'Ilt lllll)0!H"!i !H)]))I1 qlli'ill illMH Lhfll 

w muni, ronllamuHy suilj nuriii-lvoii: 

On a K' v <m proHnun, how iniu-li 
control do wu turn ovor to lliu etui- 



* How c lowly do wn nionltor? 

At what point do \v utcji In? 
What ui'o Hits I'oiiftMnii'iic^itV \Vliut 
])(nilliE!i( nm Involved for Jmlimlry ov 
for HUB fiovornntunt? 

What jirlcii do wo jniy If wn do 
not toi> In lit n itlvisn jioint? 

Wluirn Tl'CJ In cimrt'riH'il, ! think 
ovnryoiid would IIKHTH Unit llm nilH- 
tury Hlioultl ritKnrcln coiitrnl uiilcntt 
thnt uctlon IH r^tiufrnd to m-hUrvti inll- 
itory r(!o.uh'(unt>utH mid *ilii..--(i.'.i.i 



iip of llu' Vice ( ln 
Tlir lu'irnary rule if Ilin tnKinl ifi !" 
illiilin' (hill. 11 ilii.HplilH'tl iiM'llnnl i:< 
I'iilidilinlu'il fur (In- rvuliiUnn niirl >>yr. 
It'iniillc ili'Vt'lii|Hin-n1 of Al'.St' tniui 
MUdiiful liyiili'inii niul |iulii'y. 

Thin applli'.'i riipi'i'lidly In lh":,n> |>ni 
ci-dui'f'ii Mini, rnl iiri'ii;i:i fuiu'liiuud 
liiH-n ami impart mi tin 1 i'ni riti-l-u-'j, 
inli'i'iinl iutinii(!i'iiifiil, Hcllvtlkii, A 
nprcillr uh j rcl i Vi" uS' Hit 1 Imnnl i:> "I" 
llddn'ii!) lliu o,llr!i(ioii:i nf ili-;rii(;nj:i- 
niftil uiul visibility." 

Tlio ollii'i' pri'bli'iu rnii.i'd Jy TIT, 
nn jiri'viminly lit ut I'd, i:i Unit "f 
inhibit cd It'clinnlniili'iil hmm':i!inM, 
Whi'ii u nynli'iii in l'nii|-;lil :tt u lU.i'd 
prii-i- unili'i' Tl'i', Ilii-if ii n |. 'ii 
di'lH'J' In fl'i'ii'i'i' trrlllltiliij'.y :il tlii' < in 
rcid [italit tif tin' nrl. In iiiu-h u nilun 
tbui, ilnwiiJih'i'iini v, fv-i !>:. -iiHiinv 
\vhnt \viiu lnni|;lit yi-tir.-i I'lirlirr, ]n.iti 
nlily Ini'iirpnnitiiH; vn-y f-\v, if uny, 
nip, iiiilriinl t''i'hin*bif:lrill lulviiiu i"i 
iirlii.'Vi'd uftcr (In' nriHliiid I'unM'iirl 
\VIIM nljffit'd. Tin- fiinlrtn-liir j'i n..l niu 
livali'd lo Incliidi', v iu-:t;i'-;> -U'-ly 
pMi'inii', tiTliitnlntiii'nl inmnutlmn tlmt 
ivmild ini|inivi> (ho :iyji|cm if Mivli nn 

llllpl'u\'F'1lirtlE U'ullld S'lMllll 111 ili> Tr*t':<-il 

i'o:it:i. 

'I'lihi iii u ul(!iilt!rniil ju'.itiSi'Ki ntnl 
llu'i'c aro im oliurt ami nitnpl" ii"ht 
llnnti. It l>i tnii' (Iml Tl'C will Intiihlt 

1-lllUIJt)' fur (lie JijlKii nf -l|iiiij;r. It lili" 

iiimnvn thai. rliitiiiJi'n, vvlil> : h ur*- d"' 



:ii)-iii'il niniply to liriniv lli Kys 
up tii tin- |miu( \vli.-vc Hi,. , !)mlmi 
prund.M'd il v;nnld | M . I,, n,,, ii,.,^.,] 
ill'.' Within 111.' :,.Mp.. ,,f (], m|(| 

'I'lliii lIu.-M linl (M-OVi'llt thl' ( .ll,,(, ,; 

fnnii nnvplmj.. rluiiiKni tlmt \v ( 
F.i''iilly intpruvf (lie iiyiilt-in, Thii ; 
n-nmiiiii Him in'tiiiiiloi'.inil immvut 
wlili-h iiili-.hi ( .iv;,tly fiiliiincit 
vain,- !,(' ,i ,-lvrn i.yni,.,,! ln.j.,,,,,1 
riKiiutl .'.prrilt.-!!!!,,!,,,, I,, j,,])!!,)^; 
: 'iitu- !"-,[. -lit, 

W." will .H',.,1 (,, ,,|v,. ,., n , llt , 
liM'iv. allKiillmi I" l)ii:i ju'ulili.m , 
wayji t.. MMMToiin- il. Wu iin wor!( 
iu Ihlti dlivi'li.m unit i-vi-nhmlly iihfl 
Hint tli' 1 iur.v.rr fur which \\-n 



- (if o 

lii' 1 iinpiii-i'i fur 1...ili niilliary ami 
ibl ill y nuuiiijji'iiimt ; 

* '1'liu inilihtiy nunt In- ulili' In 
(ln him,. pi.'.-iM'lv v/hiil it. waittii 
(In- uiil -(, 

* Industry iinr-f Im idi|.- (. ,| r ( 
TiuTi' f"iiipli-t'ly '.vluit it. will i|oli< 
fur a |u li'i-, 

* lii'hi-ihy miiM )]' runci'rni'd fr 
tin- -ihirt \villi il'';iii;n fur iTiinumi 
pl-Mhlf! inn, MllltK rl)|i;hn'i-l'lltjj lllll'i 

d.-'.-itiU, inlinhillty, iiml niin|illi-lt.y 

limihti'ltHlti'r tfi i|i'!iij;n iirrlll'at 

111" MiM tim-. Thh Iti il limh . 
v/lilcli tii'lnnlt v iii unl(|iii'ly (|Hnll| 
in Uliii|lli'ly iii! 



f Hi" di-lidlrd itldllH; 



nmko Bum tlmt nil our 
tiro Intfltfratrd, u 
Control 



Byfl- 




ment decisions are shifted to indus- 
try. Industry managers have the 
burden of getting the necessary qual- 
ity at the lowest possible cost. This 
means that industry, rather than the 
military or Government agency in- 
volved, will be increasingly concerned 
with the need to obtain supplies and 
services from the most efficient 
sources. 

Both military and industry man- 
agement will need to find imaginative 
new ways to encourage and stimulate 
technological innovation. 

These are some of the key impli- 
cations of TPC for management. 
There might be a tendency to think 
that the application of TPC calls for 
some radical changes in our manage- 
ment methods. This is not really the 
case, although some changes are 
called for and are being made. 

The fact is that the concepts of 
total system management and of total 
package procurement are largely 
compatible. A prerequisite for TPC is 
the ability to manage systems as 
total systems. A prime requisite to 
good system management is flexibility 
of the management system. Under 
the formal Air Force management 
disciplines, we can manage a total 
system in-house in great detail, or 
we can manage in relative detail 
"over-the-shoulder" of major contrac- 
tor, or we can disengage from de- 
tailed management at any point and 
to the degree that seems appropriate. 
The reason this is not always 
readily appreciated is that some 
people tend to look at all of our 
formal management documents as 
hard-nnd-fast procedures. Actually, 
there is nothing static about them. 
They are guidelines that may be used 
in a number of different ways. 

While there may be a number of 
refinements to formal Air Force pro- 
ceduresand, incidentally, these will 
not be exclusively the result of TPC 
there are likely to be few, if any, 
drastic changes. 

In the Air Force we are currently 
looking closely at all of our proce- 
dures with a view toward their 
further Improvement. In AFSC Man- 
ual 375-1, dealing with configuration 
management, we are assuring that 
our policy is clear and procedures 
flexible enough to properly align au- 
thorlty and responsibility with respect 
to change decisions. 

We are also reviewing the instruc- 
tions In our 376 series manuals for 



preparation of hardware specifica- 
tions to assure their support of TPC 
procurements. There must be no con- 
fusion as to the quality, scope and 
specific definition of contract per- 
formance requirements and the test 
and quality assurance associated with 
these requirements. 

In AFSC Manual 375-5, dealing 
with system engineering management 
procedures, the Air Force will provide 
specific instructions to tailor system 
engineering requirements to TPG pro- 
curement. For example, the present 
manual suggests a requirement for 
approval of detailed contractor design 
decisions. The inconsistency of this 
requirement and TPC objectives is 
recognized. 

We are also insuring that tho 375-5 
manual can at least be used as a 
guide for engineering or management 
rather than a rigorous contract re- 
quirement. 

We are taking a hard look at our 
data reporting requirements. Wo 
learned in the C-6A program that 
the unusual definition requirements of 
TPC during competition may produce 
vast volumes of data, the require- 
ment for which is suspect. In fact, the 
five contractors together submitted 
a total mass of data that weighed 
over 35 tons. One contractor filled an 
entire aircraft with data and flew it 
to Dayton, Ohio, for evaluation. Over 
400 people spent two and one-half 
months a total of 132,000 manhours 
reading and evaluating the pro- 
posals. Our review Indicates that our 
total data requirements could be 
drastically reduced. 

In Air Force Systems Command/ 
Air Force Logistics Command Man- 
ual 310-1, dealing with data manage- 
ment, we are reconstructing many of 
our data items so they may be used 
selectively either for control under 
high risk cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts 
or for visibility under fixed-price con- 
tracts. 

This is just a sampling of the con- 
tinuing efforts not only to align our 
management procedures for TPG, but 
also to improve them generally. Many 
of the actions that have bearing on 
TPC were started before TPC was 
applied. 

For example, the Air Force has had 
a formal cost management improve- 
ment program since July 1964. The 
purpose of the program has been to 
improve financial management of 
systems programs and to reduce the 



amount of data needed to do the Job. 
Basically, what we have done is to 
establish standard data reporting 
criteria. We have not attempted to 
impose a single financial management 
and data collection system. We expect 
the contractor to build his own finan- 
cial management system and we ask 
only that he meet our reporting cri- 
teria. 

The criteria have been published in 
a Cost/Schedule Planning and Con- 
trol Specification. The specification is 
a contractual requirement on the C- 
5A, F-lll, Manned Orbiting Labora- 
tory (MOL), and Short Eange Attack 
Missile (SRAM) programs, which is 
a good indication of the flexibility 
of the concept. One result is that a 
specific financial management system, 
designed exclusively for total package 
procurement, has not been required. 

Some important benefits to this ap- 
proach are: 

Individual contractors will re- 
ceive only one kind of demand for fi- 
nancial management information 
from system program directors, 
whether or not TPC is applied. 

The use of the same data by both 
the contractor and the system pro- 
gram director for management of the 
program will greatly improve ac- 
curacy and reliability. 

* A valid base is established for 
effective response to management in- 
formation requirements of Headquar- 
ters, U.S. Air Force, and DOD, with 
minimum Impact on contractor opera- 
tions. 

To sum up briefly, TPC does have 
some significant impacts on our man- 
agement systems, Theso impacts tend 
to be more on how our management 
systems are used rather than on their 
actual stmcture. It is reasonable to 
draw at least four basic conclusions ; 

TPG must be applied on a selec- 
tive basis not only where whole pro- 
grams are concerned, hut also where 
certain portions of given programs 
are concerned, 

TPC requires careful structuring 
of incentives in order to assure 
achievement of program objectives 
and to offset the inhibition of tech- 
nological innovations. 

TPC requires unique recognition 
of contractor cost risks. 

TPC is well within our manage- 
ment state of the art, but it highlights 
the need for better understanding of 
the flexibility of our management 
systems and realism in their applica- 
tion. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Iii 1902 tlu! Army underwent u 
inn jor reorganization, particularly an 
far as Um procoHHOH for ilelermlninK 
future niaU'rml ronuiremitnl.il and the 
vfiHuareh, development, proruroimwt, 
mipply and maintenance of materiel 
{Figuro 1). The iH'or.emii'ii of deter- 
mining how tho Army of tho future 
be equipped, how it sihwild hi! 
and how it would light 
elevated into n consolidated and 
noparatis major fluid command the 
U. S. Army Combat Dovelopnmnltt 
Command (CDC). Oommrrenlly, Hie 
innjority of the old individual To.-li- 
nlciil Services of many yearn HlanditiK 
wiu'e abollnhod in favor of a romioll- 
diilud command ntrurtun i which wan 
more funHlonally oriented. From thin 
i-oorKani/atlon came tho U, S. Army 
Miitorii'l Command (AMC). With thu 
<!fiUihllnlnnont of thuso now major 
comnmndH tho Army wiui following 
n r.oimii' of continuiiitf mnmiKfmt'nt 
improvimuuit and ovolution, 

MHO, until thi! l9M)'n, tho priiiriiial 
throat to tho Unllod Stntcn and tin 1 
Fi'oo World wan iittovpnitod in thn 
form of overt inawilvi 1 formal military 
action. An mirh, th malcriol vtiquirc- 
moiiUi, whlrh Wfiro in tho Army'u 
rwiimveh nnd dovoloptnont ntrnain, 
woro hnlnff <lm'olo|u>tl in vciipoinio to 
thin throat, ITowiiviH', with llin IWUK- 
nition Hint tli covitrt throat- tho 
limited war, tho Ho-iiallod war of 
national lihorattoiv- -was to \\nrn u 
growinj? oomininution, tho Army ro< 
npondtMl Ut tho chantfhitf <tf addi- 
tional mntorlnt roqutromrmtii linpnfind 
by ttiiB llii'fiftt. 

Ono of tho llrnt Htopn wan tho (in- 
tnbllahmont of tho U. H. Army 
Limitod Wnr Lahoralory (IAVL) nt 
Ahordoon, Mil. (Kiguro Z). Tito inln- 
flton and purpoito of thin orgnnl/atlon 
nro to itvovidu n <|u!ck-r(m<:tlon facil- 
ity for tho dovoloptnont of HjwciaUsiod 
limited war Honia---i'(>lativoly Binnlt 
])iccos of nqulpmont the* need fin- 
which arose from oxptirlunco nnd 
study in combatLlnnr tho lower onita 
of tho conflict soulR. This Itiboratovy 
ifl item oriented rather than ayHtom 
oriented. Quito often tho colulion 



by 

M. <in. A. W. Ht'llH, UHA 
ChU'f of Uiwimrli and I)ovt'lo|tmont 
(Ulicoof Chief of .Staff, U.S. Army 

niarhi'd by thu I\VI. ftlalV to n prob- 
lem bi a modiflratinti to i'\i:illn(;' "IV' 
UuHilii'ir cixiinii'i-i'liil r(|ui|)mi'iil. 

About llir tim<! Ihul Ihr biliui-ntory 
bcnimo o]H'ruliimid, U. S, involvr 
incut in Hmil hi'iii;l Afiiu \viin lui'iri-ly 
in Hut advliior role with Special 
Kin-cm tcam.'i (i]irnithiK itvi-r widi- 
|iiu-l:i of Vlt'tmnn. l ( 'i'om lln-h- i'X|n-ri' 
CIKT ciuno n (lombal Iti'Vi-lnpnu-nl:! 
('nmmnild Special Km-rt'ii (lunniiUTiicii 
tionit Study coinplcli-il in .Iniii' \W,\. 

'I'hu purpniii- nf Ihin Hpccliil ntudy 
pi'oji-i't WIIM In drli'i'iiilm- Vinci' )! 
(|liii'i']m-nl!i for man -parli Junnl'' i'"in 
municiiliiinii, tin- adi-ijunry of i-un-'iil 
iM|ui]imcn|, in tint Hi-Id of junjrh' ''oiu 
tmuiicalionii, rhnnKi'n i" Ivrliniinii-.-i 
and concept:! of t>iii|dij.vnn'iil tu in 
ITOIUIC thu I'lllcioncy nl' niri'i'iit ri[uip 
mi-lit in tin- juiiKh 1 . and llic uvuiln 
lulity of I'ommciH'iiil i<i|uipnn<iit In 
provide inli'riin milntionn In junnb- 
commnniciktlimii pnilili'm.-i. 

An n n-smll, Ihi' Army ntnll' di 
rt'i'liul AMC to impli'ini'iil lliu rccom 
iiii'iidnlionn nf thin iihldy. 'I'tu* rcnim 
niDiiilitliniiii ini'bidcil tin- nuullticnlioii 
of I'xi.'iilliK nctn nilrli it;i tb" AN/ 



<iK<: KV. Ih.- i^.-an- of n U, S, Marino 
(!ni-|i;i AN/IMtC -11, Ibr prociironntnt 
df cdrinnrn'iiil t'i|tii|tini>nt I'm- rvahiu- 
linu jiiich a:> tin- IIC Hi::, (Ji.n^iat and 
SUycnifh-i- ('.round tu air iinitn. At tlio 
linirii' liiiH' ilrvrlu|inii'iil nf 



nf inah-riul re- 



.'U'V'Tiil il.-in;i Imvr lii'fll dllVillojIOll, 
III' i I I'U 111- in (', lil'Vi'lll]lr-l|, to m(i()t; 

Jipi'rinl l-'nri'ivi n-iiuiri-ini'iitii, AH 
minhl b" i'N|irrl-'il, Ihc fipt-i'iiil Kiirt'oii 
i'i'i|nii'i'Hii'iit ; an- itimllur |o Ihorai of 



(Ion fur Spi-i'iitl l-'in'ri'ii, providinK 
IIIHK rant!' 1 I'liMiinuniciitiiHiii with inU- 
,-ilitl luiin, wan I|I'\'I'|HJU>I| fur Spcciiil 
l-'urrm uiii' iiuii hn;i In-cn nhippcd to 
Vi.'lniuii. Til.- AN/1'H.C (M, an I AVI, 
lii'vi-lnjiNii-nl, i'i In inn' ii[t a 
\vi ( lf?hl |mtl'i'l jir-t fin- ;i|ii-ciiL| I-' 
In |!.'iii'i'nl, Sp.'rinl l-'itrcivi ri' 
ini'iiH itp|ilicalilu l.o Juiii;!' 1 
r ut i 01 i?i luivi- |in'cc.|.'d tbo.'io of cim- 
vi-htiiiniit fnrfivi, 

Ttii'i'n \vii!i nlHI nutiihi-r major no- 
tion iinilcr \viiy lit tltiu tlmi- which 
w.iiibl ntno luivi- n-pi-iTUiinioini (ill tho 



1962 Army KDT&K 



Ui-uil(|inirti'iH 
of tho 



('omhnt 



('onuimnd 



Army 
Miitorld 
(,'ommnnd 



Figure I. 



Dflcmbr 



Army's electronics program, and this 
T was the testing of the air mobile 
concept. This concept was tested by 
the llth Air Assault Division at 
Fort Benning, Ga., and, upon the suc- 
cessful completion of the test pro- 
gram, the unit was reorganized and 
redesignated the 1st Cavalry Division 
(Airmobile). 

During the initial test program the 
llth Air Assault Division installed 
n number of standard communications 
equipments in one-quarter-ton trucks 
in order to facilitate their movement 
by helicopter. Most of this equipment 
was taken to Vietnam by the 1st 
Cavalry Division (Airmobile) and has 
been used with success. Additional 
items were procured commercially 
nndj where satisfactory, were re- 
tained by the division. Included were 
items of radio relay and radio ter- 
minal equipment such as the AN/ 
MRC-112 composed of the AN/GRC- 
10 radio ami AN/TCC-3 multiplexer, 
The requirements for lightweight 
equipments for airmobile use devel- 
oped by the llth Air Assault Division 
have proved to be those of other units 
operating in Vietnam as well. 

With the increased tempo and in- 
volvement of U. S. Army units in the 
Vietnam action, there has been a re- 
newed awareness for the need of 
improved performance and reliability 
while reducing the size of communica- 
tions-el octronics equipment. In addi- 
tion, the U, S. Military Assistance 



Command-Vietnam and the U. S. 
Army-Vietnam have shown increas- 
ing interest in filling technological 
gaps and are asking for more mod- 
ern equipment. A number of actions' 
have been taken to respond to Viet- 
nam requirements as rapidly as pos- 
sible. These actions include modifying 
the procedure for establishing require- 
ments to allow the Office of the Chief 
of Research and Development to initi- 
ate development of an item upon vali- 
dation of a request from Vietnam, 
limited-production type classification 
to reduce administrative time, sole- 
source procurement to accelerate con- 
tract award, and quick-reaction fab- 
rication at Army Depots. 

An example of Army Research, De- 
velopment, Test and Evaluation 
(RDT&E) action for Vietnam in re- 
sponse to these conditions is the ex- 
pedited development of the forward- 
area PPS-6 surveillance radar. A 360- 
degree countermortar radar is also 
receiving expedited attention. 

Looking at the matter from another 
angle, just what have been some spe- 
cific effects of Vietnam RDT&E 
needs on the normal requirements/ 
RDT&E process? The first answer is 
that we have found the normal sys- 
tem a little too slow and formal for 
many of the requirements emerging 
from Vietnam. This has resulted in 
two programs: Project PROVOST 
(Priority Research and Development 
Objectives to Support Vietnam Ob- 



U. S. Army Limited War Laboratory (LWL) 


LW 


j 














Operations & Development 
Analysis Engineering 
Division Division 


Applied 
Research 
Division 


Technical 
Support 
Division 


Communications 
& Electronics 
Munitions 
Mobility 
Environment 
& Survival 


Chemicals 
Explosives 
Applied Physics 
Biological 
Sciences 





Figure 2. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



jectives) and the ENSURE process. 
Project PROVOST was initiated in 
August 1965. It began with' an esti- 
mate of weapons and equipment that 
could be made available in the near 
future, programs or developments the 
Army felt should be accelerated, and 
new programs that should be started 
in the light of Vietnam requirements. 
As a result numerous projects were 
selected for accelerated effort in FY 
1966 and financed by approximately 
$14.6 million in emergency funds and 
$28 million in supplemental appro- 
priations. Included in the list were 
a variety of surveillance devices, 
weapons, munitions and personal 
equipment. This effort is being con- 
tinued. 

In addition, special procedures have 
been established to expedite require- 
ments for development or procure- 
ment of materiel items that are not 
available in the Army inventory. 
These are items which are urgently 
needed to provide a new or improved 
operational capability and of a nature 
which permits development or pro- 
curement in sufficient time to support 
the stated requirement. This is the 
so-called ENSURE process. In effect, 
what ENSURE does, so far as the 
research and development aspect is 
concerned, is to permit the require- 
ment from the field to come directly 
to the Department of the Army 
specifically the Assistant Chief of 
Staff for Force Development (ACS- 
FOB) rather than to CDC. Natural- 
ly, information copies of such under- 
takings are provided to CDC. ACS- 
FOR screens the requirement to 
determine its validity and the ap- 
propriate General Staff agency re- 
sponsible for approval, and initiates 
action to develop or procure those 
items within the purview of ACSFOR. 
Here a word of caution should be 
injected! Too many shortcomings in 
raw material reaching the field have 
been coming to light, particularly in 
the old reliability and maintainability 
areas. Part of the solution to this 
problem, the Army believes, may rest 
in our current test and evaluation 
process and, because of this, the 
Army is now reviewing its entire 
process. It will certainly result in an 
increased emphasis on this phase of 
research and development, particular- 
ly those areas mentioned realiability 
and maintainability demonstrations 
during and at the conclusion of the 
development programs as well as for 
(Continued on Page IB) 




by 
Dr. John P. Craven 



The U.S. Navy has long been in- 
terested in oceanographic research 
and has been able to accumulate a 
considerable store of information 
about the topography of the ocean 
floor; marine animal and plant life; 
the chemistry of the seas; and the 
effect of sea, air and land on nature's 
most basic functions. 

Over the years some knowledge has 
been gained about the continental 
shelves which slope away from our 
shores for a distance of from 10 to 
200 miles. But most of the 140 million 
square miles of the ocean floor remain 
uncharted. Our best information, until 
recently, has been obtained by accous- 
tic sounding. Use of the deep-diving 
bathyscaph, Trieste, was the first suc- 
cessful attempt by the Navy to ob- 
tain information first hand from the 
depths of the ocean. Our ability to 
work at deep levels is still quite 
limited. 

The lack of U.S. capability for deep 
sea exploration and its collateral bene- 
fit, deep ocean rescue, was painfully 
apparent when the submarine USS 
Thresher sank in more than 8,000 feet 
of water in April 1963, It was this ac- 
cident which triggered the Deep Sub- 
mergence Systems Review Group and 
set the stage for a comprehensive ef- 
fort by the Navy in the deep ocean. 

The Deep Submergence Systems Re- 
view Group. 

The Deep Submergence Systems Re- 
view Group, under the chairmanship 
of Rear Admiral E. C. Stephen, USN 
(Ret.), was given responsibility for a 
comprehensive review of the Depart- 
ment of the Navy plans for location, 
identification, rescue from and recov- 
ery of deeply submerged objects from 
the ocean floor ; for recommending 
changes in such plans to provide both 
expeditious and long-term improve- 
ments; and for developing a five-year 
deep submergence program for the 
Navy. The major goal of the review 
group was to recommend reliable sys- 
tems for recovery of both men and ob- 
jects from the ocean. 

The study illustrated two important 
facts to the group. First, the Navy 
could not recover lost items by dang- 



ling hooks at them from two miles 
above. Second, rescue missions cannot 
wait weeks or months until weather 
conditions are satisfactory for opera- 
tions. 

AIL of today's methods have their 
limitations. The Trieste is more suit- 
able than other systems, but even it 
falls far short of the mark. Trieste is 
surface based, has a limited horizontal 
cruising range, and is capable of per- 
forming only very light work while on 
the bottom. 

The Deep Submergence Systems Proj- 
ect. 

On May 28, 1964, Secretary of the 
Navy Paul H. Nitze announced that 
he had accepted the report of the Deep 
Submergence Systems Review Group 
and had assigned implementation of a 
Deep Submergence Program to the 
Navy's Special Projects Office under 
the Chief of Naval Material in accord- 
ance with the latter's recommendation. 

Assignment of the Deep Submer- 
gence Systems Project (DSSP) to the- 
Special Projects Office reflected the 
importance which the Navy attached 
to it. 

Important also, in the assignment of 
DSSP to the Special Projects Office, 
was the need to insure proper coordi- 
nation with the many other organiza- 




Dr. John P. Craven is Project Man- 
ager of the Deep Submergence Sys- 
tems Project of the Department of the 
Navy. He also serves as Chief Scien- 
tist of the Navy's Special Project 
Office, a position he has held since 
1959. 



tions which have program responsi- 
bilities or vital interests in ocean 
engineering. 

On May 26, 1966, after nearly two 
years under the management of the 
Navy's Special Projects Office, DSSP 
was officially established as IL Navy 
field activity and a separate project 
under the Chief of Navnl Material. 
During this period the program Rained 
substantial momentum. Together with 
its national significance, complexity, 
and broad development potential, in- 
tensified management and focus of 
effort was required, As a doaigiiftt^d 
project, DSSP will create an environ- 
ment in which n program viability 
will be established and which will iiro- 
vide, on a continuing basis, the ntton- 
tlon of top Navy management. 

Within the broad scopo of various 
Navy ocean science programs, DSSP 
has been assigned primary rofljional- 
bility for directing, coordinating mill 
programming a substantial portion of 
ocean engineering; research and devel- 
opment funds within DOD. The mag- 
nitude of the program is noted in Its 
funding level of about $300 million 
dollars spread over the 19flfl-ifl72 
time span. 

Although tho overall program is 
clearly Navy oriented, it Filimtld ho 
recognized that tho technique mid 
basic principles acquired in developing 
military ocean engineering capabilities 
can be equally applied to eonimovcinl 
and other multi-purpose civilian pro- 
grams, 

Tho broadest Navy objective in Blip- 
porting ocean science technology Is to 
gain knowledge in order to operate 
throughout the ocean volume, and tho 
DSSP program elements deal with tho 
following specific areas: 

Submarine Location, Escape anil 
Rescue. 

Object Location and Small Object 
Recovery. 

Man-in-the-Sca. 

Large Object Salvage. 

Nuclear Powered, Deep Submer- 
gence, Research and Ocean Engineer- 
ing Vehicle (NR-1). 

Submarine Location, Escape, Rescue. 

Location: The objective- la to 
achieve a capability to locate n dis- 
tressed submarine and determine tho 
cause and nature of disablement, 

Escape: A program to Improva 
present submarine and undersea ve- 
hicle escape capability is planned 



December 1966 



which includes immersion suits and 
^ one-man life rafts to increase survival 
possibilities of escaping personnel. 

Rescue: A new system is planned 
to permit the rescue of surviving sub- 
marine personnel under all-weather 
conditions, under ice, and at depths as 
great as present submarine collapse 
depths. This system will consist of 
three units of rescue submersible ve- 
hicles, each unit to be comprised of 
two vehicles. These vehicles will be air 
transportable to provide rapid re- 
sponse to an undersea disaster any- 
where in the world. They will be 
carried to tlie scene of operations 
"piggyback" aboard a nuclear subma- 
rine or aboard a specially designed 
surface ship. The vehicles will be con- 
structed to operate at a maximum 
depth consistent with technology and 
cost constraints. Each will have a 
crew of two operators and two medical 
coipamen and will be capable of trans- 
ferring 24 survivors on each trip from 
the disabled submarine to the mother 
submarine. 

Lockheed Missiles and Space Com- 
pany of Sunnyvale, Calif., has been 
competitively selected to design and 
construct the prototype rescue vehicle. 
Operator and maintenance crew train- 
ing- ia to be started during 1966-1967. 

Object Location and Small Object 
Recovery. 

More than 80 percent of the 
ocean volume lies below present Navy 
operating capabilities. A system is 



needed to permit surveys, investiga- 
tions and recovery of small objects, 
such as ordnance and small parts of 
ships from depths up to 20,000 feet. A 
search test vehicle will be designed to 
evaluate new materials and equipment. 
In addition, a deep sea test range will 
be developed to test concepts and ve- 
hicles equipment and systems under 
controlled and monitored conditions. 
This range will provide services for all 
elements of the project. Research will 
also be conducted on material prob- 
lems associated with 20,000-foot depth 
vehicles. 

Man-in-the-Sea. 

This system's objective is to pro- 
vide a capability for support of rescue 
and salvage operations, maintenance 
of bottom-mounted equipment, explo- 
ration and exploitation of the con- 
tinental shelf, and possible assistance 
in military operations associated, for 
example, with mine defense and am- 
phibious assaults. Emphasis will be on 
the adaption of men to the deep sea 
environment at ambient pressure for 
the particular depths of operations. 
The program will also increase the 
effectiveness of all other DSSP sys- 
tems. Man-in-thc-Sea will involve: 

Mobile pressure equipment devel- 
opment needed for decompression. 

Physiological research and ex- 
perimentation. 

Surface ship modifications to sup- 
port diving operations. 




t 9 Advanced sea habitations to pro- 
vide underwater living and storage 
facilities to future aquanauts. 

* Development of auxiliary items 
such as diver-to-diver communications, 
and improved underwater propulsion 
devices. 

In addition, an advanced develop- 
ment ^ objective exists for extension of 
man-in-the-sea technology, first to 
depths below the continental shelf and 
ultimately down to the physiological 
limits of man. Initially, one advanced 
sea habitation and its auxiliary equip- 
ment will be established on the conti- 
nental shelf. Divers will then be able 
to operate from this shelf for a month 
or more without coming to the surface. 
A continuation of the SEALAB ex- 
periments is scheduled during the lat- 
ter part of 1967 to obtain data neces- 
sary for deeper depth operations. 

The next experiment, to be known 
as SEALAB III, will extend the depth 
to the 400-GOO-foot level in the waters 
off the coast of San Clemente Island, 
Calif. Three to four teams of six to 
eight divers will live in the ocean- 
bottom habitat for IB-day periods. 

To prepare for the program, re- 
furbishment and implementation of 
earlier SEALAB equipment is being 
started. In addition, coordination with 
other branches of the Navy has been 
effected to obtain data for the bio- 
merlical, physiological and hyclrobiolog- 
ical tests to be studied during the 
opon-sea experiment. 



Artist's concept of the U. S. Navy's 20,000-fooi Search and Small Object 

Recovery Vehicle. 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



Largo Object Salvage. 

Thia system's objective ia to provide 
the capability to recover large objects 
sunken ships of a deadweight lift 
of 1,000 tons from depths up to 
850 feet. To accomplish this mission, 
external lift will be supplied by col- 
lapsible pontoons with a combined 
bouyancy of up to 1,000 tons. Under- 
water work will be accomplished by 
divers equipped with appropriate 
tools and devices, possibly includ- 
ing manned vehicles. The medical 
and physiological reasearch and de- 
velopment required for safely conduct- 
ing deep-diving work will be provided 
by the Man-in-the-Sea program. In 
addition, feasibility studies and proto- 
type development will be conducted to 
resolve the problems associated with 
salvage operations at submarine col- 
lapse depth. 

Buoyancy materials will be devel- 
oped to lighten objects and for exert- 
(Continued on Page 18) 



The following excerpt from a memo- 
randum from the Office of the Secre- 
tary of Defense to the Secretaries of 
the Army, Navy and Air Force sum- 
marizes the electromagnetic compati- 
bility problem confronting the Defense 
Department and the action taken to 
cope with it: 

"The increasing use of the radio 
frequency spectrum and greater 
reliance on radiating devices for 
military purposes is resulting in 
a radio frequency interference 
problem that is of great concern. 
... A comprehensive program is 
hereby established to cope with 
radio interference between elec- 
tronic equipments and systems 
and particularly to ensure that, 
to the maximum practicable ex- 
tent, electronic systems will not 
suffer operational degradation due 
to the absence of appropriate 
means for rejecting interference 
and for achieving radio frequency 
compatibility." 

At the time of its issuance in 1960 
the three Services had in being re- 
search and development programs in 
the interference reduction area. How- 
ever, the directive gave high level sup- 
port and added impetus to these 
programs and resulted in the first co- 
ordinated tri-Service frontal attack on 
a problem which dates back to the 
very earliest days of radio transmis- 
sion and reception, Why this sudden 
interest at the highest DOD echelons? 
A review of the growth in the use 
of electronic equipments in the field 
army is one answer. 

For example, the number of radio 
transmitters used by the field army in 
1918 was between 200-300. During 
World War II there was a constant 
increase in the use of electronic equip- 
ments until at the end of hostilities 
our field armies were using about 
20,000 radiating devices. Since World 
War II there has been a phenomenal 
growth in the use of electronics by the 
Army because of its need for highly 
mobile communications,, surveillance, 
air defense and air traffic control. 

Analysis of the electromagnetic 
environment of the future field army 
indicates a minimum of 70,000 equip- 
ments, radiating rf energy over a 
spectrum of at least 150 KHz to 10 
GHz, will be required to carry out its 
mission in the desired manner. This 
estimate does not include the ex- 
tremely low-power transmitters, nor 
the hundreds of thousands of uninten- 
tional emitters of interference such as 
vehicles, generators, motors, etc. 
Further, this figure is only for one 
field army. When the requirements of 
the Air Force, Navy and Marine 
Corps, in addition to adjacent field 
armies in the event of a world-wide 
conflict are considered, the figure be- 
comes astronomical. Unless the design 
and use of these equipments is care- 
fully controlled, the same chaotic ef- 
fect as a profound enemy jamming 
program could result. 



B 




by 
John J. O'Ncil 



Definition. 

What is this rather intangible re- 
quirement referred to as electromag- 
netic compatibility? The Department 
of the Army defines it as "the capa- 
bility of communications-electronics 
equipments or systems to function in 
their intended operational electromag- 
netic environment without undergoing 
performance degradation below ac- 
ceptable limits due to unintentional 
interference, or without causing un- 
acceptable performance degradation 
to other equipments and systems due 
to spurious, harmonic, or other un- 
wanted emanations." It includes, but 
is not limited to, electromagnetic in- 
terference control which may be de- 
fined as "the adequate reduction of 
steady state or transient electromag- 
netic energy which may cause unde- 
sirable response or otherwise impair 
the operation of electrical or electronic 
equipment." Thus it is apparent that 
electromagnetic compatibility can be 
achieved in a field army only when a 
vigorous program of interference con- 
trol is in existence, 

USAECOM Program. 

The U.S. Army Electronics Com- 
mand (USAECOM) has as one of its 
functions research and development 
leading to economical, reliable electro- 
magnetic interference reduction con- 
trol circuitry, techniques, components 
and other measures which can be in- 
corporated in, applied to, or used in 
conjunction with communications-elec- 
tronics equipments and systems. The 
program in this area is divided into 




John J. O'Neil, Dep. Chief. Electro- 
magnetic Environment Div., U. S. 
Army Electronics Command, Fort 
Monmouth, N. J,, is responsible for 
the control of intentional and uninten- 
tional interference in the field army. 



three major, mutually cortiplomoutnry 
areas: theoretical analysis, dcflign cri- 
teria, and instrumentation mid meas- 
urement techniques (Figure 1), Each 
area is expected to provide require - 
ments [ to its counterpart whlcin, in 
turn, is expected to provide Riiidniicc 
in its area of interest. The outputs 
arc intended to result in Improved 
equipments and systems and aro con- 
stantly fed into the research imil de- 
velopment cycle by means of Informa- 
tion bulletins, lectures, instruction 
manuals and training coarsen. In ntj- 
dition, every effort is mado to furnifih 
USAECOM contractors with all pos- 
sible assistance in this area. 

The theoretical analysis to n mnp 
study using the field army of l!io lim& 
period under study na an Input. The 
organization is developed mid tacti- 
cally deployed down to the mtmllcst 
organizational element m a ffoogmplil- 
cal area typical of where future con- 
flicts could take place. The needs of 
the field army organ izntl OH n for 
communications, combat surveillance, 
air navigation, truffle nontrol, v.b*. t 
aro prepared to reflect nil these equip- 
ments on the geographical deployment, 
Having determined the locution ot 
equipments, a computer is then juo- 
grammed with the x and y coorclliintca 
of the equipments, propagation and 
frequency assignment data, and parti- 
nent characteristics of the transmit- 
ters and receivers. 

This is a very simplified explanation 
of a highly complex procedure. How- 
ever, the outputs from sucli R proffrnm 
yield valuable data not only In l!io 
electromagnetic compatibility nrai, 
but in the equipment and syatom de- 
sign areas as well. Thia dntn la re. 
fleeted in more realistic specification 
requirements, improved circuitry and 
more practical measurement tech- 
niques. In addition, the adequacy of 
proposed equipment and system design 
and the technical feasibility of con- 
cepts from the standpoint of their 
electromagnetic compatibility aro nlso 
obtained. 

Figure 2, which is an artist's con- 
cept of a typical Division Aren Com- 
munication Center, ia baaed on an 
output of this analysis, It la readily 
apparent that, because of the neces- 
sity for numerous equipments operat- 
ing in such close proximity, great cure 
will be necessary in their doaten to 
assure electromagnetic compatibility. 

Thus ,the analysis program Is n moat 
important tool in guiding the research 
and development of electronic equip- 
ments and in assuring electromngnollc 
compatibility and interference reduc- 
tion programs that are baaed on a 

December 1964 



"" 



Specifications. 

The requirements contained in elec- 
tromagnetic compatibility and inter- 
ference reduction specifications have 
long been subject to controversy with 
many contractors believing that the 



requirements are unnecessarily strin- 
gent. The electromagnetic compatibil- 
ity engineer, having little data on 
which to base his requirements during 
the early 1950's, was prone to cite 
requirements which would most cer- 
tainly assure interference-free opera- 
tion of equipments in the field. The 
cost of meeting these requirements, 



INSTRUMENTATION 

AND 
MEASUREMENTS 




Figure 1. 




however, was on occasion a good per- 
centage of the overall cost of the end 
item. 

USAECOM, utilizing data from its 
analysis program, can reflect require- 
ments in its specifications which are 
realistic and, although some criticism 
is still heard, differences can generally 
be quickly resolved when the contrac- 
tor is fully aware of the problem 
anticipated when the equipment he is 
developing reaches the theater of 
operation. 

The measurement procedures speci- 
fied in the specifications are not ideal 



Figure 2. 



TT-A v;;,-;;;-;-* sub J ect to improvement. 
USAECOM has long believed that the 
most meaningful tests can be con- 
ducted only in an open area out-of- 
doors. The performance of tests in a 
shielded enclosure is, of course, the 
most_ideal method. This is especially 
true in these days of expanding sub- 
urbs where open real estate is becom- 
ing- scarcer each day. Consequently 
a research study is being conducted 
to eliminate the present source of 
errors in the testing of equipments in 
shielded enclosures. This technique 
will utilize newly developed antennae 
and a new configuration of enclosure. 
Although proceeding very satisfac- 
torily, it is not anticipated that this 
program will be completed over the 
entire frequency range of interest for 
about 18 months. This program, cou- 
pled with the development program 
for automated instrumentation cover- 
ing the frequency range of 14 HKz to 
40 GHz which will reduce testing time 
by 75 percent, should greatly alleviate 
many of the problems now encoun- 
tered in the testing of equipments. 

For many years the three Services 
have insisted with some justification 
that, because of their individual pe- 
culiar requirements, a single tri-Serv- 
ice coordinated specification for all 
equipments was impractical. However, 
over the years with improved instru- 
mentation and measurement proce- 
dures, coupled with analysis programs 
and field experience, it has become 
possible to standardize the require- 
ments of the three Services and in- 
corporate them into a tri-Service 
document. 

The document will be in the form 
of three Military Standards, which 
will detail "Requirements" (MIL STD 
461), "Measurement Procedures" (MIL 
STD 462) and "Standardized Defini- 
tions" (MIL STD 463). The standards 
will incorporate requirements and pro- 
cedures for testing of communica- 
tions-electronics equipment, non-com- 
munications-electronics equipment, 
electrical equipment, and special 
classes which will include vehicles, 
power lines, etc. Drafts of these docu- 
ments are now being reviewed and 
commented upon by industry. Al- 
though they undoubtedly will require 
revision for a short while after being 
implemented, it is believed that more 
uniform testing and a considerable 
saving of time and money will result 
from this program. It is anticipated 



Defenia Industry Bulletin 



that the atnndimlH will Ins completed 
during .1067. 



USAECOM currently 
Military Specification MIL 10 fifiHOl, 
titled "ElcctromnBiiolto fJompntibll- 
ity," ail tho RovorniijK intorforonco 
reduction document in its procurement 
of electronic equipment. Thin fipocHt- 
ention in almi lined hy other rommiindii 
of the Army when promrinir other 
typos of interfaronco producing nwte- 
rlol. It deiicrilxw requirement H for 
tactical, tactical mipport and lulinin- 
ititrntivo typo equipment and eoinliinen 
and Hupernodoii tho requiri'montu of 
four older npnelfleiitlonn. Thin dorti- 
monl; hns only hcon in ww idncc April 
IDflti mid IIIIH lnuin fvonornlly well ro- 
eolved. 

In this document nn effort wan mailn 
to rotmlvo 11 prohlom tliat luut iilwayn 
faced the, Intorfonimio reduction engi- 
neer, i.e., lusliipf confronted with a 
piece of equipment ready for produc- 
tion, wlilcli doon mil: conform In 111'' 
specification, neeejmlliil.inK costly, 
bulky rHrofltit. Anything le:i:i limit 
complete confornwni-o niny render I he 
equipment, or iidjiicont eiiuipinonl:, 
uBeloHH when it rcachmi Ihu Hold, It. in 
neooHHitry that lie lke an "educated 
RUCNH" and attempt to recommend 
"lmiif[-on" treatment which In never 
as eflVcUvo or economical mi when 
tli IB problem In considered in (he eiirll- 
oat dofllirn Hinge, 



Consequently, Mil. K mi re 
qulron tit lit the contractor iiulunil, ti 
(Ionian pltin which will nprelfy tin* tie- 
nlffii nwpwilH of the equipment, himifor 
us clectromaKinitic compittthlHty lit 
conconted, Tho preiiaraUon of thin 
plnn in time cwwnmlnK. However, l(, 
in Unto well npoiit mi the UHAKCOM 
specialist can itenenilly rccontinend, 
when required, new circuitry and 
toclinlqiiiiH which are, frcqucnlly eiuilur 
to apply, more wonomlciil, anil provlile 
greater effectlveiKmii than Unit, prn- 
poHfid hy a contraelor who IIUM hail 
llttlo xperlenc in thin area, or wlut 
is not acquainted with the <>um<nt 
Htato of tho art. Nimllarly, u lent plan 
IH required prior to the performance 
of toHlH. Thin plan linn pnivin inviitu 
ablo aH In many iiiMUincen n conliiielur 
halt overlooked requirement or pro- 
posed conductiiiK unneciiHuiiry tenU 
Dioao delloiencloB, which provhnmly 
would b noticed only when HIM tenl 
i-oport wiui ituhinillx'd anil would MII 
Bomo occiuilomi require cojitly re ti^l- 
Jnar, nre now pin-pointed when Ihe 
teat plan IH Huhmitted for mvi.<w. 
Sim liir rotiuliwnontH nr incorpt.nili-d 
In Uio now military HUutdardti, 

Iiuhmtry MnnnKonicnl Role. 

Tho trotiiondoufl Incrcnao In Ihu inte 
of olcctronlc doylcon within DOl), 
which roqulroa tlto uio of tho fr. 
quonoy Bpectnim for nullntlon or 
reception of oloctromnKiiotlc enorirv. 
is not expected to louiion in tho fore, 
wablo future. Tho uunblo frctiuoncy 
apoctnun l a vital rcBOurco S IB 
inaufflclont to anility tho noeda of fl U 
tho ueora un oil Uio b<mt p 08 
efficiency in atUlnod in IU yio. 



necennity for in^'rft'rein'n redurlion 
nod elcctrnniiiKiietii 1 rnini'Htiliility run 
only Inci'enni' during Ihe .niitiiitr yruu; 
like deiilli nnd luxes v;*- riiinmt nv.iid 
it. 

[t uppeimt, Ihoi'i'fnre, Hint nuin:i(;c 
nicnt in lht)!ie riniipiitilt-si ilr-iicniitK 
nnd prudtii'ttiK elfdi'unli 1 fiii'ipninnl'i 
for Ihe ntlUtiiry nlmuld lul'- an ifdvc 
role in I'iilnMltihltiK luncuiin v.il)iin 
Ihe I'OMiiMiiiy u'hli'li ifrii|;iili-'"i i lib 
pnihleiu III ii-lallnn tn (In- |'|M|U. t (it.- 

' 'i'lnpnii'iit. initlnt-Ji"itr 'l\\[* 
lniiild nvi'ivn full 'iii|.]n.|t i.f 
i'til. nnd Im inli-f-;i iih'.l v, iHj 
ainl pn>Ki'"iiM'i>' H'liin.l 
and i|0|iniV''(l In ni!iht(:i)ii -i'..i',<- "f 
the (trl rnnipi'li'iii-t'. II SIMM)'! n -ui .- 
tlllll tln'I'i'Mfrh ri>IIl'ii'l,i'i..:L (. i: r..n 
In cli'i'l I'i'l i tli KllHir r"iii)..i" i}i;h) ',' 

Illl'lHllih till lt:ij'l'fl'i i-f it'".||;)\, ,],-;,-\ 

uplili'lll, prMi|iii-|i,.n Hint fi-'il. it;: !>.-! 
jutry. 

Miiny riuitnirloni. ffi-i-cniriifj.' l! 1 -* 1 
pi'dlili'in ;i tun' nf MVI-I lui'i'itii; 1 iliU-i 
t'Jidi, hnvn fiitaltllnlii'it tiii.lv J-LM;' >iu-, 
nnd tlin-i'letl Unit nil itutv.htK'! ' = 011 
pruveil liy lla'ir ell 1 , li >'iiini-:i!'^'>' <'iH 

pjllllllltty (.ri'HIp |Ul"*l' t'i !i:rh u:-.^ Iff 

Ihe I'll 1 11 |c a I lull i'f t'ljiHi'in'-!-. 1 ! i \\\\-\ 

I hey vi tli I i ii iti iy cuisUy ini*-;ij!f * t?i 

I'llhllll't. lll'ulHH, I' 11 I'll' UlSn, tn:;:!<'lil'M> 



n [tifif !i;i" iti-^'^-' <>* 
.ivi-i| |n Jin vjoi;. !,;-)*! 
ill lllll'i'lly leldlril to Un- rtnt't'iisin 
plarfil Mil tlilll ['l'Mi;i(Uti 1;; |r.ni::aj. r i: 
lili'tlt, It. hi I.elti'Vni Unit ft'u> ?i i, j,),. 

trrani wnitltl tint imly In ^\i ii,j>u.? : \! 

llIK III U fill"ll lltlll', tut U.mi-l st-'h'.'.,'. 



Kt'Iirially 



. 

I'lleiillloll t.f AllltV '-|Ml|ihi.-hlr; lif.; 

llt'hl. I'l.li'liinUHlilly, ll hi hk's'CftKHs 1 !,' B 

very t'lotic linhi.it |. t i nmM!it;*=.i < 
(til i|it\vtn|.|iii'lil t-n^Huvta tssil Sf.aiil 
'f t'MAKl'OM (IfltlillKfl ill MLI tr fl 
iltlpMiVi'd rhvtiiUy, |rv)iht..>ict> r!t, 

trivi'ii wlilph'i. 
Hen. 



f"il!iuir In ttd utfit. A 
"n*;iyit (JuMa" tma 
which pr-svlili'M Mm 

.iHitl n.| 



Mf til.' f'|tllli|Ml-|lt 

|lllIllirJllll.|| hft t.^rivrsl ^,J r , 4; n i( 

Hill tltll Mfllt U tlVHilMl'tn M lltn |Mr- 



be 



from 



, Vft, fittfil. A 

.Mrn fr 
' 



, ' i >H < [Vn 

";'" :"""" f """" .-,, h w it 

;!;;ri ': 1M i:!u'S:iiiu m ' IIhi '"''t^nij 
,!" M TI;"" |V ' ""' "'"' t>f "w to 



, 

M-ljiiM t-nh/uK..,,," in,. ( , )mm itt f 
' ll!l! '-''' lu'.ni'.-.-ln.i,, ( .n I... ]ik, % l 
I'* n ii. -A!V intn'iil.'d iii-l <if llvMno 
l>^''" '"H'Mtr l<.t,.| Al liml. (hJ'U 
-.-.ill r t nm Mu- i|,-) t iHwIunih where ^ 
..m ^,.iK ^nh I....I.I lit, ( a K iLi|y lini 
''' 




f >-V3 ')" miiii.1 hi,,, in h!n wo ,i, 

= ussifriin !'.!! (M lit-, < ( tChHll(f, Utl|. 

ui'-i> E.< IT DuiM f,,r thvlr fntnlllci, 
n.l i*i.-i, u-.- ,iuv itiilvK!) win-it nil tht 



'( In- f;uj!Mif IH 

).Un-:.-Jf "Mill |li r.-f 

'.ius !? ; >- (-> sti.hii-.-'i f.f ftiiin yield, 

*i't M-tt ),-!i)(f.!rrj ,,f Oil' (-XilllUK M- 



in <.'U *!i55, isvt'fl Hitiy t'ft'Mic ItlfOll- 
'.*-i.,(.>.r..',i ):! H^tJKtVftflu)!. Hi I'plljf. 
ij,iu-i..rq hi M'.<- MiHHiiiy iiro cl 
nUiii'ii/cs-;*)^ r.iOKniSintr. t:MAK''(tM nnJ 
f.!,n Jh^-flsttiitTjii t.f [}; Aiioj'i tia well 



10 



mtt^l. vital re- 

i<t;t|. All CVtr 

''h'''iliir equip- 

in Ill-i'PSWy 



-oiniifttiMIity 

ej ; ,j*^'(s*J iri ii Uplil, ficvwroeflf- 
e t-Ait rwnuU. UtfpiiS'p runlrtf- 

)i.>* tHr^ijgMj iIPlf'!''JI HIlJ JirodliW : 

Wl.ri-al ami i'lectronic J 
jii. fth^wM iiwlnliiln ft"s* 11*'' i 



* if (heir pmiHHng Senlca 
itti ll |H'siMe Ktlow 

tnlrttmlH* Uio possibltii? f 



moat 



In 



or, in 



1W* 




ess by Gen. John P. McConnell, 
Chief of Staff, U.S. Air Force, 
-A-tnerican Ordnance Assn. Annual 
Preparedness Meeting, Los 
Calif., Oct. 5, 1968, 




Gon. John P. McConnell, USAP 

Plonning for a Future 
Force Structure 

In all our planning for tho future, 
thoi'o Is one factor winch we cannot 
plan, mid that ia tho future itself. 
Wo ntvust, therefore, make certain as- 
flum;p-tioris which are based on tho 
experiences of the past and tho, trends 
of tHo present. On that basis we 
must ti*y to protect our needs for tho 
imm. e cl x a te future and chart our 
course for the more distant future. 

TJHo, nerial weapon systems which 
wo liave in our operational inventory 
today were largely conceived and de- 
signed years ago when no one could 
have jpoasibly foi-eseen that airpower 
waa destined to play a dominant role 
in a giuerrllla war in Southeast Asia. 
Tho fact that we do have the quanti- 
ties ancl types of aerial weapon sys- 
tems "to assume this unprecedented 
role is n great credit to the vision 
nnd perseverance of the men who 
planned an( * fought for these weapon 
systems. 



By the same token, it is our respon- 
sibility to make as certain as is 
humanly possible that the weapon 
systems which we plan and recom- 
mend will be equally useful and adapt- 
able to whatever needs the future 
may bring. 

We have witnessed so many dra- 
matic and unpredictable events in our 
lifetime that it may seem futile to 
try to anticipate conditions and re- 
quirements some five or ten years 
from now. This is just about the 
length of time it takes to bring a 
modern aerospace weapon system 
from conception and initial develop- 
ment to operational readiness. While 
the future holds many unknowns and 
variables, there are also some factors 
that give us a broad indication of 
what to expect and plan for. 

In contemplating the future, there 
are four general areas of unpredicta- 
ble developments, that is, develop- 
ments over which we have little or no 
control. These areas are : political 
developments, military developments, 
technological developments, and catas- 
trophic events. 

Political developments may \con- 
tlnue to bring about radical changes 
in the international power balance 
and the alignment of nations. Today's 
bitter enemy may be tomorrow's 
close ally and vice versa. I cite the 
example of Japan which was our 
ally in World War I, our enemy in 
World War II, and is now one of our 
staunchcst allies, No one can predict 
tho course of the Sino-Soviet split; 
it may be breached or- result in a 
stand-off or, conceivably, lead to 
open hostilities. Revolutions and in- 
surgency or the rise of a Hitler-type 
dictator somewhere in the world 
could possibly spark a major con- 
flagration. 

Wherever we look there are poten- 
tial trouble spots, and chances are 
that there will be more and still 
graver threats to world peace in the 
years to come. One reason for this 
is the rising tide of nationalism 
among some of the developing na- 



tions. Another reason is the host of 
problems that will be caused by the 
population explosion. Ever worsening 
lack of food and essential raw mate- 
rials, if not of actual living- space, 
may induce some nations to try to 
take by force what they need from 
their more fortunate neighbors. 

All these potential developments on 
the international scene will have- a 
direct bearing on our national inter- 
ests and will compel us to take some 
action, either for our own protection 
or that of a friendly nation which 
seeks our help. Examples of the past 
are our actions in the Quemoy, 
Lebanon and Cuban missile crises. 
No one can predict what crises we 
may face in the future, where they 
will occur and when, and what action 
we may have to take. 

Closely related is the next area 
of unknowns military developments 
which, though not of our making 1 , 
will involve us in one way or an- 
other. I am referring, in particular, 
to unprovoked acts of armed aggres- 
sion such as we have had to help 
counter in Korea and, presently, in 
Vietnam. We must endeavor to deter 
and prevent such aggressive actions 
but, for some time to come, we can 
expect the communists to continue 
encouraging and supporting these so- 
called "wars of national liberation." 
Where and when the communists will 
strike next, we do not know and, per- 
haps, they do not know themselves. 

Nor are future military develop- 
ments that may pose a threat to us 
limited to local aggression and con- 
ventional wars. Looking further 
ahead, we must be prepared to deal 
with the problems resulting from 
nuclear proliferation. The prospects 
of Red China's intents, once she 
achieves an operational nuclear capa- 
bility, are rather ominous. There ia 
also evidence that a number of other 
and smaller nations will endeavor to 
join the expanding nuclear club, 
either for their own protection or for 
aggressive purposes. 

Looking still further into the future, 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



11 



it ia conceivable that some ambitious 
dictator or belligerent nation will try 
to exploit the space medium for ag- 
gressive purposes, rotfar.dle.Hn of any 
international agreements to the con- 
trary. Even a small nation, building 
on tho developments made by larger 
and more affluent countries, could 
thus achieve political and military 
advantages out of proportion to its 
size and resources. 

Tina brings me to the third area of 
unknown and unpredictable factors, 
namely, technological development!! 
which may have a revolutionary im- 
pact on the moans and techniques of 
warfare. AH far us our own ell'oiin 
are concerned, we have a fairly (food 
indication of the advances we cnn 
expect to make in the years abend, 
although Home dramatic discovery or 
new phenomenon can lead to surpris- 
ing technological breakthroughs. 
Needless to say, we cannot count, on 
such breakthroughs, let alone incorpo- 
rate them, in our planning for the 
future. Yet, with our accelerating 
progress, the next decade or two may 
bring scientific development;! that 
defy our imagination today. 

Even more difilcult to anticipate 
are tho technological development" 
pursued by hostile and potentially 
hostile nations, because their efforts 
are normally cloaked in the greatest, 
secrecy. A major breakthrough on 
their part could seriously threaten 
tho military superiority which we 
still possess today. l''or instance, if 
the Soviets should succeed In develop' 
ing a highly effective defense uKainnl, 
our ballistic miwifle)!, perhaps haned 
on Homo dramatic new dinrovery, they 
would gain an advantage comparable 
to our atomic monopoly after World 
War II. 

Tho final area of unknowns for the 
future su-o catastrophic eventn mirh 
no major earthquakes and other 
disasters of far-reaching conse- 
quences. You may remember that the 
devastating earthquakes which Japan 
suffered in 102ft, at a cont of over 
1130,000 liven, completely upiml the 
timetable of the wov lonta who were 
then in power In that country, The 
most disastrous earthquake In re- 
corded history occurred Homo 400 
years ago in China whon reportedly 
830,000 people wero killed. Dimuilci-H 
of such proportions can cliango tlm 
course of history and, in fact, can 
make helpful frtonda out of, oncmloH 



or out of an nggreii/ior and bin in- 
tended victims. 

I'Vom what I have niiid KO far, il 
may appear that, tin* future m 
fraught with no many iinpreilii'hililc 
threat:! and variables Dial it in nil 
hut linpo.'iiiilile to plun for It n<aliu 
ticully and ed'erlivt-ly. Hul nuiii 1 ;m;il 
yni.'i also ]iermlt!i ccrtiiin rnnr|ini.in!i 
which, If properly fippHi-d, ran be 
lined an broad I'.ultloliinM l'..r ntir 

planning, ivi| inlly with iv'.pn'i in 

tbe military nlivrnfl we iniiy ncnl in 
the future. 

I/or one, we run h" certain tbiil , 
for many yearn to rnnn', the wm Id 
environment will be mnrln p il by In 
stability, nun 1 !, I niul n wide num-' n) 1 
i'oiilllet:i, We alnn himw Hint llim- 
will br conliinilng llin'iil'i l.i .>nr nu 
liniuil Intorenti! and, hiil-Til, uur 
neciirlly. Ulnrt* wt- fin- tin 1 nt<><.\ jn.w 
erful and pro-ipemiiN ri>iwiiy >ni 
earth, (be mtlloiii! nf tb>' l''r--'' \'/.>it.| 
will nmlimie to lonk f.i ii'i t'.-i 1 b-;i>l< t 
nil !p and uii.'ilithmri', l!y ibe nimn' 
lolfeil, lilt 1 forren nf itK(<i'''i ! >i")i '.'.ill, 
an hcrrlnforo, roiittldcr id ihc inn in 
ntmlncle to tho Mltninnn'iil ..f (In lr 
objective!) tind will, lliei.-ft.iv, i-n 
deavnr In nnji our nlri'iiKlli )y <li;tv.' 
ing tin inl mllii't-i nf ev.-i y t \.\, 



; 1 " ;; " " ni|ll( (i ""'< meamu-otl ] n 
ion to tuuni-ni,,. ..J,,,..,, 'V 

l'i" r In It ,ub JlTl to 



Hii mil' iu\'nlvriin'Ml:>, \vil! r<-iH.'Hii \i\ 
bid in nmpM n;i llu-y l\i\\>- ]n^-n .,^ il 
World War II bill', h-vim.... ,.f ih.. 
1'j'owini', 1 ('ii|Uilillllii"i nf nuv .>Hii"tiri>ri. 

1 (ley will (liinltlli'h;) |I!MI'I< in.- 1 .'jr.ir,,.; 
i'1'nuninie und Miilltary di'nnunl^ n u->. 
l-'inally, wi- miKii iiutlrlpnte (hid ',M' 
may ln-i-nmM Involvnl in ...n)!i!!, i( t 
any level of lit!- 'unity, i;mj;tiM? h.<itt 
Innil crlssi-ii und In^ui'};. nry in !ii, t j|<-il 
warn and, iin;it.ibly, uliflna- H^(.MI'. S 
idnn. 

All tlientt i'MiH'lll:ii"ii'! i-; ; tu!'!i'i)( |](n 
Keneral eiiviroiiint'iil for uhjrli v,.- 
have to phui, Miin'<< we riihnnl |.i.',li, ! 
the !tpi<i'Hh''i, our plim<. mti 4 l<r )!> * 
ilile eiiou)rli In bit mlnpiiitil" i, un 
fureiioon rondiiioiHi uitt! il'ni'lHui.i-Hi>, 
At the naiiie Mini', Jinwevr, htu- j.Sim^ 
inunt \w dotinit,. eiinii)jb (.< nU*,-,\ u* 

any futun- I'Miilln^'nry nill | u^.-wl 

Kuril pttiiinltiK IH ftir mt-iv diili.MU 
and complex fur Uit< inililHry Umi, IW 
liny other aiva of mtii<mi<l i'M'l^v..r, 
Wo know that, ri'Kiirtlli*H of uln>( Um 
Aiture may liolil, wi* m n imi 
reninifi titronjj t'lrnniiiiilciilly, 
ftiul niurally. Hul uur 



TI '" t'l""i!t,. i,i (rue f,,r || l(> mj[|> 
li-y Mr-nmli \vl,irb W(! n-quii-,, to 
day fin.E will iv.,niiv it, Hie W i.rt,| ,f 
l"l'in,T..W. It HIlllL.V. MM),. dilTr.r..|iPO 



"Hi 1 llr-.l l.n.lil.^Mi, Ihi.ri.fniv, in ( n 
try to Id-Mlify tbe m , m( l|| i( , ]y U|(|| 
M'l-jnii:, tluvul-, unit |ilnii li.Trtriiliijdy, 
'I'tilit IN n inU.'b i. nuillKi- ,,f jiji-mi,,],! 
Ii '" t -' '' "f lin-i-inviatlun. nnil thn 

'"-M |ir..t.| t . M | |r ( I,, ,;! IIHIVl.rill.ntrtOll 

til" ii.iiiii|>tjnnii und nppruvnl of tlu> 



lh " "; ! "'H"ii (I', i. f,. w ynin t 
\ir I-'MI.-.- w.ul.l tiuvi< iii,| ( t>i| formally 

mllllM!!!. ..r llnlhuM wnl-llt of 
Ii...l(ll )l,.|rl)n >,,! ||,lil, ill (.(,;;,, 

li-iiilil I.. I'.it.i.' inv.itvi'd ||, ,i 
W<M- ;il , m .'wb.-r,. In A "lii. wo would not 
'"' '''M:if will ..... r nmnilUii! ,| I(WI1 | 



ly, ibi'r.' In I.M nitiiitant 
fH.'ft.r in Uii'i )ivr|d'-sbiK <'i|ll|il!<in of 
-MI i:il'|.-: : MIX! iinLnnu'iiii, mid thnt 
I 1 **-'!'*!' in MUV nutiiiitjil jii,||,-y. It lui 
h'-'-n, >-i!i!l h>, mot will cmiliniii' Lo Iw 
mi- iutl|..iml jh.lli'y f,, },i'l|i I'lillllilljlll 
mid nijiinliiiii ti u-urld ''iivlruniiK'iit ill 
-.vliirh r:.c,i-iHf{M iiiiti'Un ran III'ICIJIIT 
iintt )ni' ; sl.: tli'iif i'ti.ii;i<n way of lib 
v..iMi..ni t r .- ; ir "f jit:H>-ii'4,.N, Tilt' pur- 
'-.nil f Mti-i jn.lii-y hi tint mily in nur 
i'v,n nul|nil intTi-;,t liiil In iihiii n 
m-nul M<i|it;ull<ni li-llfllni; lliin, III" 

|"Vri|ff:,( | t hUM "H I'Hl til. 

'J'li- !.'!< .,f ihn ntllltnry in llm 

iiSInlnnu'itt ft Un'int iiitttnlinl (iliJi'C- 
Hvi'fi I, (=t .!'.( imi' (JoVfrniiii'llt US 
MM iiif(friii)i'-nl ff tbe HianiiKcmHit 
nf t.-nllh!-) wJii.'li ttiji-jit'-n tin- rmi- 
rtty tttul ^p-lfnif nf Iblii I'oiiiitry (ir 
"f tiiiv titi.-r ft.'" iMtti'Ht, Wlille our 

Illflfil 'Hit! ..!'3rvltv:.'l tlo tl'lt l'llllllf!<' ( t'lB 

i'^mtili'iHci IM!''| J wli it-It we 



tmr msililary jn|iti)iilftJi-H itiviM. flnmgii 



fc'W H HumU-r r.f jvara following 
Wt.rM \Vr II mir niilitiit-y 
was? liiiifsiNt jirintitrHy t<n 111" 
>f itUftpur wr BUI! itt iJc 
An lh .%vit>u K'|it hullilliiR U|t 
eujHibllily, uur military 



egy underwent various modifications 
which were intended to provide the 
best deterrent to nuclear aggression 
under prevailing; conditions. 

The prevention of nuclear war has 
remained our principal task to this 
day and will remain so throughout 
the indefinite future. The preserva- 
tion of our nuclear superiority on one 
hand and, on the other, our demon- 
strated determination to prevent 
nuclear war have induced the com- 
munists to resort to conflicts at the 
lower levels of intensity. This, in 
turn, compelled us to place increasing 
emphasis on our conventional forces 
in addition to maintaining a credible 
margin of nuclear superiority. Thus 
our strategy grew into one of "flex- 
ible response," designed to give us a 
range of options in responding to 
acts of aggression under the protec- 
tive "umbrella" of our nuclear deter- 
rent. 

The question arises what kind of 
military strategy we will need to meet 
the broad requirements and uncertain 
threats of the future. Recent events 
have shown that conflicts with which 
we must cope may range from local 
crises, such as occurred in the Domin- 
ican Republic, to largo-scale limited 
war, such aa we arc now fighting 
in Southeast Asia. With Red China 
approaching an operational nuclear 
capability and with the chance of 
nuclear proliferation, the possibility 
of nuclear aggression cannot be ruled 
out either. 

This moans that, in order to cope 
with the increasingly demanding con- 
flicts of the future, wo must bo fully 
prepared to act or react and to deter 
or, if necessary, fight at any level 
across the entire spectrum of conflict 
Intensity. This is indeed a big order 
and we can fill it effectively and eco- 
nomically only through a well planned 
management approach which is de- 
signed for the whole conflict spec- 
trum, rather than rely on unplanned 
ad hoc" strategies. For this reason 
we are gradually turning to what 
may be called the "military strategy 
of conflict management." This wide- 
ranging strategic concept serves the 
following objectives: 

Still foremost, deter nuclear war 
by maintaining a sufficient margin of 
strategic superiority to assure the 
destruction of any aggressor and to 
keep the potential damage to our- 
selves within acceptable limits. 



Endeavor to deter conflicts at all 
lower levels of intensity and, if deter- 
rence should fail, keep such conflicts 
at the lowest possible level and help 
resolve them to our advantage. 

Assist in the resolution of local 
crises and help prevent them from 
expanding into armed conflict. 

To achieve these objectives, the 
strategy of conflict management re- 
quires a force structure which meets 
the following conditions: 

It must be capable of instant and 
effective reaction to any demands 
made on it by our national leaders. 

It must possess such flexibility 
that it can be adapted to any condi- 
tions, scope and level of conflict, offer- 
ing a wide a-ange of options and be 
responsive to any changea in organi- 
zation and tactics. 

Weapon systems and equipment 
must be superior to those of any 
enemy and be adaptable to unprece- 
dented requirements or conditions. 

Since we cannot afford to main- 
tain forces and bases at or near every 
potential trouble spot around the 
world, there will bo an expanding re- 
quirement for mobility. This calls for 
further emphasis on airlift which 
must servo to deploy increasing 
numbers of troops with their equip- 
mont to any place on earth, and to 
do so exneditiously and safely. 

The global deployment of our 
forces and the need for rapid, well 
coordinated action demand highly ad- 
vanced command-aml-control systems 
which are foolproof, reliable and sur- 
vivable under the most adverse con- 
ditions. 



Address by Hon. Robert A. Brooks, 
Asat. Secretary of the Army {Instal- 
lations & Logistics), at Annual Meet- 
ing of the Association of the U.S. 
Army, Washington, D.C., Oct 12. 




Hon. Robert A. Brooks 

Defense 

Materials System 

(Editor's Note: Although this address 
w repetitious to some degree of 
the articles on the Defense Mate- 
rials System published in the Novem- 
ber UBIM of the Bulletin, it is carried 
here to emphasize the importance 
placed on the operation of the astern 
(>V key Defense officials.) 



Dfnie Industry Bulletin 



Time does not permit me to go 
into further details but there is one 
more requirement I want to mention, 
and that is the need for achieving all 
this at an acceptable cost. Economics 
may be secondary where the very sur- 
vival of our nation is concerned, but 
we cannot afford to strain our econ- 
omy to the point where physical 
survival would become meaningless. I 
am confident that, through wise man- 
agement and good judgment, we can 
obtain and maintain a force structure 
that meets the military demands of 
the future and yet imposes no undue 
strain on our economy and resources. 



World conditions today demand 
many unprecedented efforts to in- 
sure our national security. In- 
creases in the size and composition 
of our defense program are certainly 
evident of such endeavors. There are 
many measures which can be taken 
by the Government to protect our 
national security. The deployment of 
military forces to various parts of 
the world, the development of new 
weapon systems, and foreign aid are 
a few examples which are familiar 
to most Americans. Other measures 
are not so obvious to the general 
public. One of these is the operation 
of the Defense Materials System in 
our economy and this is the primary 
topic of my discussion. 

While I don't propose to go Into 
the details of the operation of this 
system, I think it is both timely and 
very important that industry be made 
fully cognizant of its existence, its 
purpose and its requirements, (See 
"The Defense Materials System and 
Priorities," page J, and "The Use of 
DMS and Priorities by the DOD and 



13 



DofonBC-Rclatcd Agencies," 

Defense Industry liulletin, November 



Tho Dofonflo Pepiirtment flnda it- 
self in n unique idtualion probably 
never experienced in tho immo decree 
in tins liitttoi-y of thin country, <>r any 
other country for tluit nmller. I inn 
referring to current effort n toward 
muintaininfj; the defonno pontui'e in 
support of n luu'niflnuit effort in VIel- 
mini, wliilo at tins name (lino avoiding 
impo.'iiiiK any real eonlroln or re- 
utrietionii on Hie civilian economy. 
Naturally, our Unit concern Iti focuurd 
upon metitinK military ren,ulrem('riln in 
a timely mammr. However, there In 
a concurrent mid concerted effort 
within 1)01) to nvold ndioim whlcti 
might; create tin advorms impact on 
tlio civilian economy, Obviously, thin 
in u wont diftlcull ladle, one requidiiK 
n iiouml unil healthy economy which 
IB prepared and willing to nupport Hie 
effortH nummary to aumire our na- 
tional mtcurlty. 

Several trondn liave been uncovered 
which indicate that indunlvy and MI- 
fenni) are beginning to fed (lie piiu'h 
of trying to imtinfy Increiineil defmuie 
reiniireinuntn in an economy whirl) In 
iitralnlng to meet tncremicd conMiiner 
domnmlii, In thin connection, (he 
Army him delected a reluctance on 
tho pnrt of indunlry to rwipoml to 
Invilalionu t( hid and mnu'iilu fm p 
propound, By way of an example, ti 
review of five nepiirale nollcllattomt 
whoweil that out of 1IIIU companleu 
HO I idled, jutit four I'miponncn wem if 
colvod. Thin In not nn laolutcil lu- 
ntance; thoro are other exampten nf 
ftimllar magnitudo llntlng nurli n-n- 
lioiiB for non-roitponfio an; miga^cd In 
other work, Inmifilclcnl. capacity, un< 
ablo t/> meet delivery iicheiluli', prefer 
commorcliil work, and juiit not inter- 
ostcd. 

Another factor, which In 
cnuao for grantor concern, 
upon lircrontiocl lend tlmeii for many 
items which wo procure. For example, 
needed forgingfl, carding)! nnd ex- 
trusions njipcar to bo Ihn pacliiK fno 
tor In many iiitttmicwH. Tlihi particular 
problem wan coiwldorwl of mifllrltml 
mngnltudo to wnrroul Htudleii liy the 
Air Korco and tho Army nnd, ltU 
In Saplombor, tho AnnlHlnnt 8ncrolury 
of Dofonuo (InatnllatloiiH and LoKbi- 
tics) naked Urn Air Forco lo hrnil up 
a DOD tonrn to atudy tho Nllunllon 
and mnko rocommondntloni. It IH 
contemplated thnt Industry cooporn- 



14 



lion will be < i nlitited lo Himiire proper 
coiuiiderulion of thin problem. 

While nurh Ireiidif lend to indi 
cale tliat nelleffi' inarlieln pn-vnll, Ibnl 
a tight labor market exinln, mid Ilint 
there \i\ ulrotig coiupi'til inn fur cer- 
tain nmteriiiln, comiionents ini.l nui 
chine tooln, Hie Army in mil yd 
eoiivinci'd Unit industry linn rnieln'il 
I ho iwluniliiHi point, llnunvrr, llii'sn' 
Irendn lire ;ailtli'li'iit lo v.iu r;int in 
rivalled Muily ami I'l'in-'ilhtl urlinn 
U'ilhin 111' 1 limits nf rui'M'iit ju'liry 
aml pnici'dureii. !iniin' tf tti" nlfjui 
wllfeli luive been tiilien t" U'ljunl mil 1 
proeuri'Mieiil. pr<i);nim.'i I" Ib-- titrfi'M-M 
of (lie preiient cconomlf I'livli'iiiiiiinil 
are: 

* Incrcani'd Uiiii of nuui" bi'l'lini: 
where |irodlicllon cii|nirlly in llniit<'>l. 

hn-reaiied ii:-e of innlll yi-ni' \>n> 
ciireiiienhi ( tiiKe tnlvcmt:t(;-i ,.f 
nl!iii(liirili/!illii nint !ifiit<IU,-<-i| jo )<! i 
nver it Iniiner jutriml ,>f limn, 

Advanre reli>u;," <-f jir-'fUi'i'iin-it! 
iiil'orniatloii in enable industry '" ''( 
ti-r plan iln pri'ihieli'in. 

* Mn\lmlllll lltilJ/iUli'M nf llMVrlll 
inent OWlM-i! pl'iublrliMii . iiji;n-i(v. 

Kiglit veiservtt Army |il;mt<i worn ri- 
iietlval.'d duriint FY Ituiii, 1., .i.|,|i 
lion, louh) hnvii lit mi ilivmt'-tl fi'.iin 
nlher ntiimtby |inf!ing.';t |u nn-.-I ai-liv.' 
prudurtion n-qiilrt-ment.M, wh*irn tip 



A loe.it.,, nuiterinb, mH | fndliti ef 
'" ! ; (l1111 "im'r, "Pon mich co ( |Ui olla 
111111 '" I1U1>1 ' " xt( '" 1 "'I li nlmll 



I'll" Of 

terlnlii, wh 
A iti'fiif 



<>n 



t woiilil lll.e to Mp*'i'Hi.'ntlv cull 

lUI<-M(lon [u HIM hUUM, 111" n 

Mul.'Habi Hynleid, u.-,iuilly rcfi'i'i 
mi HMM, To provide (lie l'r.^! 
wllh I tin nt't't'H^iiry iinthnrUy t-t 
inoto tlm inili'Muil il"f*'iim<, Ui* 
givjiH linn ronHitui'd in nflVvi 
Ilefeniie I'r.ttliicti.ui Ad f ItJM 
HiiH'iidrd. Tin' nn MUtlit.ria.-3 (tm V 
dent to: 

Kt'i|iilni Hint 



Ibn 



or tinluru, which h* 
or ttpjiroprlHU' K. ( 
llm imiloiiiil itcfnihr, fshnll 



cnnlnuit or ofdi-r, mill In 
ncc|tancfl am! itrrfnriitHHfA t\t 
contriwUi or tinlt-ra in 
other eontrucU r orders by Buy 
on 1m Audi Ut b 
performance, 



. ' rl '" ''''""''i''"'. Ity .'xorutlvo order 
111111 ''"I'-K"!"'! tin-nit atilhoriti.M, to H,d 
"tllrp ,,f I'liui-i-K.'iiry l'laimtn ff . This 
" ltlrn Illltl . '" '>"'". 'lt.|i.ui,.,l to the 



i-lbllily to nitinlnialor Hio 

'""I H"''utl"ii:i funi'lluim will, mi , )( , ct 

l.i ithluiklrinl imnlurllun, cmm( ruction 



niipl..yi-.t lu rarry out lhe:;e iui(| mr |. 
lit-' iiml It di iti-,%1,,.,1 |, ( urnnii|lin]i 
tw.i m, HII |mr|i l( M.|i. |.'|i-,,[ | J L la a 
I'l'-i'ii'' "f dlr.vtiuK tin. |i,, w of mate. 
Hnl'i m lt | |ir.>ilih'i.>i t., Imtum that do- 
fi'iisi.. in-.-nnini'i ore malntiiln,.,! on 
'"'"''I"!*'. ''<' ..... I, Hie openiUun of tho 
xyili-iM it-itiilt-i the imilnlenniu-tMif mi 
mlniliiKti.ttlv.. in. ;,!!, f,r pniin]itly 



Hi- i. .units 1 in n timflcit or |^,, 
\vnr, 'I'lti.-i |;> nut 11 htuiidby nyt of 

|irlrllfx I| llM-, l.rrn ill COtllillUOllH 

|ii-r(tlln t ,t n ,'n IIIMI. H.twevor, until 
iv.-.-nity tb.'ie Wl( tt only a 
in-c.1 f-.i i.'i'.mrmt lii prlorlllen 
iniro DIM.'.* Ut" imllniml hiihintrlnl 
M-niinjiiy wjui HKiiiTtilly ulile to i,ii ( ij,ly 
.!''fni::<> u.'i'ih ul the reiilie^lcil rato, 

lll-|Vn< : .-(| ilrri-nco IV^llilVllieillll (i) 

t.ii|.|-H Hi.-. i.ulMnp (n VI.'huHii jilnml 

tnhl.lun i|,(ntll!l MM |llt> HitCil f(.r lijift. 

ih>l i'il"i-lrt-i (uninfunri-. \vithli, tho 
Any Mui.'iii-l ('uiniimnil (AM(!) 
iiliim-. Hi" miiiiln'S 1 i*f reo,itt'iiht for IIJIR- 
clitl pi-l"ilHi'"j ii^HJiiiaiH'e routs friini 07 
in ,!mmsuy nnitl, t t*H In I'Vlnnnvy, 
tuid r.Mi lii Miuvli. Thi'i vapid Iiiwiiiin 
b'v.ite.| ..if in April nnd AM<! incur- 
lenity itn-i'-^fsjiiih* ppr.\iiniilcly 100 
r.'ipt. TI!-< |.,-i- mt.alb, Htitwt'fii Jmmnry 
itn>i Aunu-il, AM(' pr.ii't'tint'd ti tnlnl of 



irrvaw wht*n I 
uiilt n (Mini \>( !!ilt prort^iiit'd 1 1 tiring 
i-iihifi'lwr y f n\r lUfl'i, A Bljfnlflcnnt 
mini)*'!' i>f tlif reijuentfi wi'rn for 
pn*ihii'li<.ii i<nuipiicnl for tlofniiio 
rf, n '*'"! indlciitlon thnl 
s U-cn rco.iiiri'd to px|wml 

itnwfal J)OU III niwlitlff its 

rnfufn'm^nU, Thti ninjnrlty 
i.f UIP&P cBK^n Involve H hnrd core of 
rrfUml li^ms, nmtnrlMU nnd compo- 
s tirs exlrtialunfl, forK- 



, nylm webbing, 
ntl mujptftt wire, Sup- 
re KpttrUnjr lht U**'' 1 ortl(!r 
a.r filled ta capacity with 



rated orders and it appears that com- 
, petition between rated orders exists 
at the lower subcontract levels as 
well as at the prime contract level. 

In an effort to cope with this con- 
dition, the .Defense Department and 
the Business and Defense Services 
Administration (BDSA) jointly con- 
ducted 30 orientation meetings across 
the country for both industry 
and Government personnel during 
April, May and June of this year. 
In addition to conducting orientation 
meetings, DOD reinstated the sched- 
uling procedures designed to sprnad 
production of short supply items 
among the various military cus- 
tomers in an effort to assure that 
deliveries are made according to indi- 
vidual program urgencies. Notwith- 
standing these efforts, there is much 
that needs to be accomplished within 
DOD, associated agencies and BDSA. 
Two specific areas which were high- 
lighted for further effort were a 
need for additional education on the 
use of the Defense Materials System, 
and a need to provide adequate per- 
sonnel support for proper manning 
of the offices responsible for priorities 
and allocations functions. Both areas 
are receiving continuous attention. 

I want to emphasize that under the 
authorities of the Defense Produc- 
tion Act, contractors can be required 
to accept and perform under con- 
tracts and orders which the President 
deems necessary to promote the na- 
tional defense, and that such con- 
tracts and orders take precedence 
over other contracts and orders. I also 
want to emphasize that use of the pri- 
orities rating is mandatory for indus- 
try as well as DOD, Nearly all defense 
orders bear a priority rating. There 
is an optional provision for contracts 
and orders under $500, but the cur- 
rent practice is to rate even these 
amall orders. The mandatory use of 
ratings protects the priority status of 
the procurement cycle throughout the 
entire chain of supply from the orig- 
inating Defense agency down to the 
lowest tier subcontractor and supplier. 
There are just two ways In which 
a priority rating can be obtained. 
One is through a Government agency 
authorized to assign priority ratings. 
The other is through your customer 
producing under a rated order. There 
are just two ratings which can be as- 
signed. One is called a DX rating and 
the other a DO rating. DX is the 
higher rating and is assigned only as 
an emergency rating in cases of ex- 
Defense Industry Bulletin 



treme urgency. All DX ratings have 
equal preference, but take precedence 
over all DO or unrated orders. All 
DO ratings have equal preference, 
but take precedence over all unrated 
orders. 

The DX rating is assigned to cer- 
tain programs selected by the Presi- 
dent as having the highest national 
priority. Except for these designated 
programs, DX ratings are assigned 
as a bottleneck-breaking device, and 
are issued only by BDSA. Further, all 
DOD-rateable contracts include a uni- 
form priorities and allocations clause 
which requires the contractor to com- 
ply with BDSA regulations in ob- 
taining materials and products needed 
to fill his contract or order. Copies of 
pertinent BDSA regulations may be 
obtained from Department of Com- 
merce regional offices, 

Programs having the highest na- 
tional priority are very few in num- 
ber, of a relative small dollar volume, 
and are deemed of such importance 
that every possible authority is used 
to prevent them from being delayed. 
At present, DX-rated programs are 
14 in number and are known as 
"Brick-Bat .01" programs. Twelve 
are administered by DOD and two 
are administered by the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administra- 
tion. The total dollar volume of all 14 
programs is less than 25 percent of 
the total rateable procurement. A 
limitation of 26 percent is placed on 
such programs to keep the DX rating 
meaningful. 

In some cases, the regular proce- 
dures provided by the Defense Mate- 
rials System may not be sufficient to 
enable contractors to fulfill defense 
deliveries on schedule. Thia may re- 
sult from a variety of situations such 
as conflicting rated orders on the 
supplier's schedule, inadequate facili- 
ties to produce the required 'product, 
and the like. To aid defense con- 
tractors in overcoming such produc- 
tion bottlenecks, or to expedite de- 
liveries, BDSA provides special 
assistance. Under such conditions the 
contractor may submit a request for 
special assistance to the local office 
responsible for administering the con- 
tract. This request is submitted in 
accordance with instructions from the 
responsible procuring agency and each 
agency in the chain of command 
attempts to correct the problem. If 
Intermediate agencies are vtnable to 
overcome the difficulty, the request is 
forwarded to BDSA for appropriate 



action. BDSA provides special as- 
sistance in such cases by several 
methods such as: 

Arrangement of improved de- 
livery dates by informal agreement 
with supplier. 

Issuance of a DX rating if appro- 
priate. 

Issuance of a directive requiring- 
the supplier to produce the specified 
item by a specific date. 

The chances of successful action are 
greatly enhanced by the early receipt 
of such requests and the completeness 
and accuracy of the information fur- 
nished by the defense contractor. The 
special assistance procedure, however, 
should not be considered a substitute 
for early placement of rated orders on 
suppliers and adequate follow-up to 
determine that original shipping 
promises remain valid. 

There are other means of assisting 
DOD In its efforts to meet increased 
requirements without creating an ad- 
verse impact on the civilian economy. 
Industry, for example, should seek 
every means to avoid use of critical 
materials through increased emphasis 
on value engineering. Substitution of 
materials may not only enhance the 
contractor's ability to meet delivery 
schedules, but may well result in in- 
creased profits. Industry should also 
exert every effort to seek additional 
sources of supply through more effec- 
tive "make or buy 1 ' programs, rather 
than waiting for their own production 
capacity to open up. 

A strong and ready industry is as 
much a part of our national defense 
as a competent military organization. 
The Army- industry relationship must 
be maintained as a dynamic one, 
whether it be the ability to produce 
the standard hardware, gear up to 
fabricate new and more sophisticated 
designs, or accelerate to produce the 
emergency requirements in support of 
the Southeast Asian contingency. 
Many firms which originally produced 
nothing but military products have 
expanded into the commercial market 
and have become relatively self- 
sufficient and no longer need to rely 
on defense contracts. Conversely, 
industrial ingenuity has also fostered 
the development of commercial appli- 
cation for many defense- oriented tech- 
niques and Items. Only through con- 
tinued cooperative efforts between 
Defense and Industry can the strength 
of our nation be maintained to meet 
any threat to our security. 



15 



Tho Impact of Vietnam 

(Continued from Page 5) 

the initial production run. There is 
no doubt that everyone in industry 
can understand our concern here, and 
any suggestions that will assist in 
meeting the problem are welcomed. 

In summary, it can be said 
that, while there has been increased 
interest in and emphasis on provid- 
ing RDT&E support for Vietnam op- 
erations, this has been mainly for the 
shorter-term solutions. In addition, 
there has been some increased use of 
off-the-shelf items, particularly those 
which are readily modified to meet 
a requirement. \Ve intend to continue 
this practise where it is advantageous. 

We have expedited the development 
of electronic items wherever possible 
for earlier introduction into Vietnam, 
but the full results of these efforts 
are not yet available since the fielding 
of these units began only this year. 
In keeping with this practice, it 
is probable that some of electronics 
items now in the Army RDT&E pro- 
gram will have first use in Vietnam. 

The Army's current interest in 
electronics is two-fold: We retain an 
active interest in systems and devices 
for use In Vietnam on both a long- 
term and short-term basis; we do not 
intend to slight or reduce Army's 
RDT&E efforts in support of its 
world-wide missions. 



D*ep Submar0ru 

(Continued from Page 7) 

ing external lift. Investigation, object 
preparation and rigging will be ac- 
complished using divers or manned 
submersibles developed under the 
man-in-the-sea rescue and search pro- 
grams. When achieved, the system ob- 
jectivedeep ocean salvage will ex- 
tend man's work capabilities far below 
the 280 feet now attainable by stand- 
ard diving methods. 

Funds are to be expended for a life 
support system to be used as a part 
of salvage program as well as sup- 
porting the man-in-the-sea experi- 
ment in 1967. The life support system 
consists principally of a personnel 
transfer chamber and a rest and 
refuge tent habitation used at depths 



up to 600 feet and a surf ace -mounted 
deck decompression chamber. 

Research on gas generation under 
ambient pressures, displacement and 
de-watering materials, and pontoon 
systems controllability is planned. 
Problems associated with adapting 
deep submergence vehicles for salvage 
use will also be investigated. 

Nuclear Powered Deep Submergence 
Research and Ocean Engineering Ve- 
hicle (NR-1). 

On April 18, 1965, President John- 
son announced that the Atomic En- 
ergy Commission and the Department 
of the Navy had undertaken the de- 
velopment of a nuclear-powered deep 
submergence research and ocean engi- 
neering vehicle. The capability of this 
manned vehicle, designated the NR-1, 
will be an order of magnitude greater 
than any other developed or planned 
to date because of the vastly in- 
creased endurance made possible by 
nuclear power, and the technology 
gained by its development will pro- 
vide the basis for development of 
future nuclear-powered oceanographic 
research vehicles of still greater 
versatility and depth capability. 

The NR-1 vehicle, which will be 
able to move at maximum speed for 
periods of time limited only by the 
amount of food and supplies it car- 
ries, will have a crew of five and two 
scientists. The vehicle will be able to 
perform detailed studies and mapping 
of the ocean bottom, temperature, cur- 
rents and other oceanographic param- 
eters for military, commercial and 
scientific uses. The development of a 
nuclear propulsion plant for an ocean- 
ographic research vehicle will result 
in great independence from surface 
support ships and essentially un- 
limited endurance of propulsion and 
auxiliary power for detailed explora- 
tion of the ocean. 

The submarine will have viewing 
ports for visual observation of its sur- 
roundings and of the ocean bottom. In 
addition, a remote grapple will be in- 
stalled to permit collection of marine 
samples and other items. With its 
depth capability the NR-1 is expected 
to be capable of exploring areas of the 
continental shelf, an area which ap- 
pears to contain the most accessible 
wealth in mineral and food resources 
in the seas. Such exploratory charting 
may also help the United States in es- 
tablishing sovereignty over parts of 
the continental shelf. A ship with its 



depth capability will be capable of 
exploring an area several times that 
of the United States. 

The Navy's DSSP office has overall 
responsibility for the NR-l's develop- 
ment. The Naval Ship Systems Com- 
mand is responsible for vehicle design, 
development and construction. The 
Atomic Energy Commission's Division 
of Naval Reactors is responsible for 
the design, development, construction 
and test of the nuclear propulsion 
plant. Design and development of Uio 
reactor has been assigned to the 
Atomic Energy's Commission's Knolls 
Atomic Power Laboratory, Schcnee- 
tatly, N.Y. Design and construction of 
tho vehicle will be performed at Gen- 
eral Dynamics Corporation's Electric 
Bout Division, Groton, Conn. 



Overseas Civil 
Service Positions Open 

The Army Electronics Command 
(ECOM) at Fort Monmouth, N.J,, IH 
seeking applicants for electronic 
equipment specialists and training in- 
structors to servo overseas in civil 
service grades GH--7 through GS--11. 
Salary for tho open posltiona ninffo 
from $6,451 through $0,221 a year, 

Equipment specialists, jrracloa GK-0 
through GS-11, will be assigned Ini- 
tially to Vietnam, to work In 
ECOM's Technical Assistance Pro- 
gram. 

Training instructors, grades CJS-7 
and GS-9, will bo Riven frequent and 
short-time assignments in all parts of 
tho world. Selectees will undergo 
factory or service school training, and 
will work In teams giving 1 new ivmlc- 
riel briefings ami now equipment 
training. A basic knowledge of clcc- 
tronicH and communication a is neces- 
sary for those positions. 

Specialization for the equipment 
specialists in in tho areas of com- 
munications, surveillance, avionics, air 
defense- and infrared. Working in t3io 
Technical Assistance Program, they 
provide assistance, including instruc- 
tion, installation, operation, main- 
tenance and related supply of 
electronic equipment for field com- 
manders in the Army's world-wide 
operations. 

Contact for information on tho 
equipment specialists program is 
Frank P, Gavin, Civilian Personnel 
Div., Russell Hall, Fort Monmouth, 
N.J. 07703. (Area Code 201) 632- 
1048. 

Contact for information on the 
training; instructors program ia Mrs. 
Josephine Jubert, Civilian Personnel 
Div., Russell Hall, Fort Monmouth, 
N.J. 07703 (Area Code 201) 632-1548, 



December 1966 



Lt. Gen. Theodore J. Conway, TJSA 

LS been assigned as CommanrW in ' 

' TT O cii -i t-t """'"inimtSI-in- 

, u.ti. btnke Command, and U.S 
Comniander-in-Chief, Middle East/ 
Southern Asia and Africa, and has 
been named for a recess appointment 
to the grade of general. He s 
Gen. Paul D. Adams, USA, who 
Nov. 1. 

VAdm. Vernon L. Lowrance, USN 
has been named Dep. Dir., Defense 
Intelligence Agency. 

Dr. Edmund E. Dudefc, formerlv 
Technical Dir, Naval Personnel R 
search Activity, San Diego, Calif, has 
been appointed to a newly created 
position as Military Manpower Re- 
search Coordinator in the Office of the 
Asst. Secretary of Defense (Man- 
power). iman- 

Dr. Harold O. Wycoff 1ms assumed 
duties as Dep Scientific Dir./ A 
Forces Radiobiology Research I 

Seymour J. Deitchmnn has been 
appointed Dir., Remote Area Conflict, 
Advanced Research Projects Agencv 
succeeding Maj. Gen. C. J. Timmes,' 

Maj. Gen. Milton B. Adams, USAF 
has been appointed Dep. Dir. for 
I'orces, Defense Communications Plan- 
ning Group, Defense Communications 
Agency. 

William R Laidlaw, Vice President 
of Research & Engineering, Los An- 
geles Div., North American Aviation 
Inc., has been selected as Spec. Asst! 
to the Dir., Defense Research and En- 
gineering, 

Leonard Sullivan Jr. has been an- 
pointed pep, Dir. of Defense Research 
and Engineering (Southeast Asia Mat- 
ters). 

RAdm. Fowler W. Martin Jr., USN 
lias been designated commander of the 
Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alexan- 
dria, Va, 

Col. John G. Wheclock, III, USA, 
has been designated as Dir., Policy 
Planning Staff, Offlcc of Dep Asst 
Secretary of Defense (Planning * 
North Atlantic Affairs), OnlceTlsst 




mandms Officer, Edgewood Arsenal, 



ChaparraManagenent ce 
Command, Redstone 



i v='V ' Bro Ston, USAF 

uince at the Secretary of Defense 
Cnl. T.* G. Pradonburg, USAF, has 

remenfc Training, Of" 



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

RAdm. Lewis C. Coxe has been re- 

CT w f f r m , duty as Commander 
South Western Area, Naval Facilities 
Engineering- Command, totte pSiffi 
of Dep. Commander for Acouisitinn 

S w PaC ^ ities ^neerin 9 Com.' 
mand, Washington, D.C 

Capt. Paul J. Hartley Jr. has 



A N G W assignments 'in the Office of 
Asst. Secretary O f Defense (Public 
Airansj are; Col. .Tpaai i? G*,... 
USAF T"io pit i _r eMHit! " &tiiy, 

tion; Col. George F, Hamel USA 
Chief, Veterans & Civic National Or- 
ganizations Div., Directorate for Com- 

VjUiKitt, US) A j CjillfJij A. J*inv l"5fv rii 

rectorate for Security Review. " 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

Maj. Gen. Frederick J. Clarke has 
lrt n assigned as Dep. Chief of Bnc"i 

Sin ^ S 18 !?? 6 ?, * facers; 
smngton, D,C. Maj. Gen. Robert F 

(iiock replaces Gen. Clarke in fim 
triple role of Commanding ^ 

Al'lllV Tl1lln.jTi.nn-. /-|__.t__ *-. a 



ffice in Wash - 



Joyce B. James has been 

P Q J h \ ne } v D SP- Commanding 

General, Strategic Communications 
oommand, succeeding Brie. Gen. Wal- 
ter B. Bess, who retired. 

Dr. William Van Royen heads the 
new Environmental Sciences Div of 
the Army Research Office-Durham, 



Capt. Raymond S. Sullivan, USN, 
has been named Dir., Defense Contract 
Administration Service Eegion St 
Louis, Mo. ' 

Traffic Management 



^ , 

on, D.C., has announced the 
following assignments; Capt. Francis 

fi;. G Ubb 'tr US *' ? lr ' of Fr eteM Traf- 
fic; Col. Homer L. Sellers Jr., USA, 

rii' $ TwroinalB and Installations 
Co!. Glen F. Petric, USA, Office of 
comptroller and Programs. MTMTS 
rffrf aimo nc % the reti nent of Col. 
Si* 3 $' C }*y? ool > USA, former 
aS' T erminal * and Installations 
and Col. Armour S. Armstrong, USA, 
former Dir. of Freight Traffic. 

h^' Clarcn . ce J - Douglas Jr., USAF, 
has been assigned as Asst. to the Dir 



-- "| ^^AliUOC \JtJlll- 

^^ssSfS&S^ 91 Defense 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



Col. George H. McBride, Project 
Manager of the Hawk air defense 
missile system has been nominated for 
promotion to the rank of brigadier 
general. 

Col. Nils M. Bengtson, who has just 
returned from a year in Vietnam, has 
been assigned as Dir., Research & 
Development, Army Missile Command, 
Redstone Arsenal, Ala, 

Col. Delbert L. Bristol has assumed 
duties as Dep. Commander, Army Avi- 
ation Materiel Command, St. Louis. 
Mo. * 

Col. Eugene B. Datres has been 
named Dep, Commander. Army Satel- 
lite Communications Agency, Fort 
Monmouth, N.J. 

Col. George H. Russell has been ap- 
pomtad as Dep. Dir. of Developments, 
Office of the Chief of Research & De- 
velopment, Department of the Army. 

Col. William W. Stone Jr. has re 
lieved Col. James H. Batte, as Com- 



DEPARTMENT OF THE 
AIR FORCE 

J, William Doolittle has been ap- 
pointed as General Counsel of the Air 
Force succeeding Stephen N. Shulman 
wno has become Chairman of the 
bgual Employment Opportunity Com- 
mission, 

Brig. Gen. Ralph G. Taylor Jr., is 
now serving as Commander, USAF 
lactical Fighter Weapons Center, Nel- 
ns Ai 1 B, Nev. 

Donald R. Eastman Jr. 1m been ap 
pointed as Technical Advisor to th, 
Commander of the Arnold Engineer 
nig Development Center, Tenri 

. Col. Elmer Torgcsen has been as 
signed as Dir., Category III Test 
Management, 407L Program. Tactical 
Air Wai-fare Center, Eglin AFB, Fla. 

. Co1 - Alfred D. Blue has been as- 
signed as Chief, Electronics Div., Of- 
fice of Dep. Chief of Staff (Research 
and Development), Directorate of 
facienco and Technology, Air Force 
headquarters. 

Col. James O. Franbosky has been 
assigned as Dep. Dir. for Strategic 
?? , D( l f ?. nse Forces, Office of Dep. 
Chief of Staff (Research and Develop- 
ment), Directorate of Operational Re- 
quirements and Development Plans, 
Air Force headquarters. 
, Col. John McCorkle, Dir. of Ma- 
teriel Management since May 1965 
has been named Dep, Commander! 
Mobile Air Materiel Area, Brookley 
Al 1 B t Am. 

New assignments in the Air Force 
bystems Command are: Col Robert 
A. Duffy, Dep. Dir., Air Force Avi- 
onics Laboratory, Research and Tech- 
nology Div., Wright-Patterson AFB, 
Ohio; Col. David S. Mellish, Dir. 
Air Force Weapons Effectiveness 
leatmg Air Proving Ground Center. 
Eglin AFB, Fla.; Col. William P. Lem- 
me, Air Force Plant Representative, 
Boeing Co.. Air Force Contract Man- 
agement Div., Wichita, Kan.; Col. Cal- 
vin W. File, Dep. for Limited War, 
Aeronautical Systems Div., Wright- 
Patterson AFB, Ohio; Marc P. Dun- 
nam, Dep. Dir., Aero Propulsion Lab- 
oratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. 



17 



DIRECTORY Of PERSONNEL OCCUPYING KEY 



WFIC OF PHMftMIAP 
ftADM IHOMAS MVIIS (Din 
OF lima ft Urlln IDcp Dlrl jnd 

IDipFO'SyilEmiAnll.dil 
IWCASSIfOJJDIBANooiPOIH 
CAPT Jotinostullltbftin 
CCUimiiPRHribLnUSMC 
Itof tor UiMC AUtlifil 















ZATIQNAL POSITIONS IN THE NAVY DEPARTMENT 



Oiritt CI NAWAL FEIBMCDM 
OILSHALERtifRYES 



1H U9M 



CORRECTION OF WAY*L RECORDS 
MrChuitt [ Cunr, n. 



N*VAL IXMIIPIIIJC ISUPFIV CORfSI 

CAP! isfin A SWHSCI 



CAPI G C BcnilMI 

RtjJinml 
CAPI H lltfiJiO 

(Dir of Pro(uinmnl) 
CAPJWfEngil MN Jilt SIS!) 

lOli ol Itu'uilrul Engintirm]} 
CDR JHllill Mil I'M illil 

IDuol lnslilliNmi)',rililieil 



MR NQRUAN JftlAU 



Olfirt 01 MANAGEMENT IWOR.MA1IW 
CAPt IMS M BBOCAN (SCI HIJI WB1 



rPI Flint's Hut 
Y5TiJ. BEVilOPMiNl DIUIUCM 



IKADOUARICR5. NW L I.1AUHIAL fOWWiD 


VADMI JGAIAIIN 
CpriVCL(liBJn 


WO *8M* 

IO BHH 


virtrnifforii 

RAOM Rilph L Sdiltiv 


)o tssia 



*Individiml organization charts of the 
Office of the Chief of Naval Opera- 
tions; Headquarters, Naval Material 
Command; and Headquarters, U.S. Ma- 
rine Corps will appear in the January 
is&ue of the Defense Industry Bulletin, 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



Defense 
Contractors for FY 1966 Announced 



Top 100 Companies and Their 
Subsidiary Corporations Listed 

According to Net Value of 
Military Prime Contract Awards 

Fiscal Year 1966 
(July 1, 1965-June30, 1966) 

The 100 companies which together 
with their subsidiaries received the 
largest dollar volume of military 
prime contracts of $10,000 or more in 
FY 1966 accounted for 63.8 percent of 
the U.S. total. This was 5.1 percentage 
points below the 68.9 percent obtained 
by the top 100 companies in FY 1965, 
and was the lowest percentage for the 
top 100 companies since reporting was 
initiated in FY 1957. 

In FY 1966 awards to U.S. compan- 
ies for work at home and overseas in- 
creased 38.7 percent to $33,632.6 
million and the 100-company total 
increased 28.4 percent to 21,400.8 mil- 
lion. The value of ?40.2 million for the 
company in the 100th position on the 

.."", tne current fiscal year is $16 
million higher than the 100th company 
figure in FY 1965. 

The rate of increase in FY 1966 for 
awards to the 100 companies lagged 
10 percent behind that for total 
awards. At the same time small busi- 
ness firms increased their share of the 
total from 19.6 percent in FY 1965 to 
21.4 percent in FY 1966. 

Millions 

of 
Dollars 

$33,532.6 



Rank Company 
U. S. Total 
Total: 100 compan- 

ics and their sub* 

uidiarieu b 

1. Lockheed Aircraft 

Corp. 

Lockheed Shipbuilding 
& Construction Co. 
Total 

2. General Electric Co. 

3. United Aircraft Corp, 

4. General Dynamics 

Corp. 

Stromberg-Carlson 
Corp. 

United Electric 
Coal Co. 

Total 

5. Boeing Co. 

6. McDonnell Aircraft 

Corp. 

Conductron Corp, 
Hycon Mfg. Cof 
Tndea Electronics. 
Inc. 

Total 

7. American Telephone 

Telegraph Co. 
Bell Tel. Co. of Pa. 



21,400.8 
1,525.6 

6.4 

1,631.0 
1,187.0 
1,188.7 



Rank Company 

Chesapeake & 

Potomac Tel. 

Companies 
Mountain States Tel . 

Tel. Co. 
New England Tel. 

& Tel. Co, 
New Jersey Bell 

Tel. Co. 
New York Telephone 

Co. 
Northwestern Bell 

Tel. Co. 
Ohio Bell Telephone 

Pacific Northwest 

Bell Tel. Co. 
Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. 
Southern Bell Tel. & 

Tel. Co. 
Southwestern Bell 

Tel. Co. 
Teletype Corp. 
Western Electric 

Co., Inc. 



10. 




!. Textron, Inc. 

Accessory Products 

Corp. 

Bell Aerospace Corp. 
Cleveland Metal 

Abrasive Co. 
Delmo Victor Co, 
Durham Mfg. Co. 
Erie Tool Works 
Jones & Lamson 

Machine Co. 
Nuclear Metala, Inc. 
Sheaffer (W. A.) 

Pen Co. 
Textron Electronics, 

Inc. 

Textron Oregon, Inc. 
Townsend Co. 
Total 

Raymond Interna- 
tional, Inc.; 

MorriBon-Knudacn 
_ Co., Inc.; 

Brown & Root, Inc.; 
and J. A. Jones 
Construction Co. 
North American 
Aviation, Inc. 
General Motors Corp. 
Avco Corp. 

Kaiser Industries 
Corp, 

Kaiser Aerospace & 
Electronics Corp 

Kaiser Jeep Corp 

Kaiser Steel Corp. 

National Steel & 
Shipbuilding Co. 

fn-J.-i 



Millions 

of 
Dollars 



7.3 
1.6 
0.6 
0.4 
0.2 
0.4 
O.B 

0.2 
0.6 

2.5 

0.9 
18.0 




163.2 



20 



Ford Motor Co. 
Philco Corp. 
Total 



647.9 

520.4 
608.0 
606.0 

1.0 

3,0 

42.7 

86.4 
"4413 

91.7 
347,9 
430.6 



Rank Company 
16. Spcrry Rand Corp. 
16. Raytlieon Co. 

Amanii Refrigeration, 

Inc. 

Dnffe-Boll Corp, 
Machlett Labora- 
tories, Inc. 
Micro State Elec- 
tronics Corp. 
Pcnta Laboratories, 
Inc. 
Total 

17. Wcstinffhoiiue Elec- 

tric Corp. 

Hagan Controls Corp. 
Thermo King 1 Corp. 

Total 

18. Martin-Marietta 

Corp. 

Bunkor-Rnmo Corp. 
Bunker- Ramo 

Eastern Technical 

Center, Inc. 

Total 

19. HuffhoB Aircraft Co. 

20. General Tiro & 

IlublKu- Co. 

Aerojet-Delft Corp. 

Aerojet-General Corp. 

Aerojet-General 
Nucleonics 

Batesvillo Mfg. Co, 

Fleetwood Corp. 

General Tire Inter- 
national Co. 

Space Electronics 
Corp. 

Space General Corp, 

Total 

0-0 21. Griimmun Aircraft 
Engineering Corp. 

22. Ling-Tcmco-Vouglit. 
Inc. 

Continental Elec- 

tronics Mfff. Co. 

Continental Elec- 
tronics Systems, 
Inc. 

Kontron Hawaii, Ltd. 

LTV Electro ay atoms, 
Inc. 

LTV Ling Altec, Inc. 
OKonito Co, 
Total 

23. Bemlix Corn. 
Beck-Leo Corp, 
Bendix Field Engl- 
Hearing Corp. 

BencHx-Westinghouso 

Automotive Air 

Brake Co, 

page Electric Co., Inc. 
Microwave Devices. 

Inc. 
Sheffield Corp. 

Total 

24. Douglas Aircraft Co. 
26. Northrop Corp. 
Northrop Carolina, 

Inc. 

Page Communications 
Engineers, Inc. 
Total 



Million! 

of 
Dollar* 



a 6 e.i 

I 
0.2 

ICU 
0.4 

0.6 

3<J8.fi 

943.1 
0.1 

5.5 

8-I&7 

' BO.'fl 
0.4 



0.8 
SBC, 5 

1.0 

18.4 



0.2 



7.8 



H22.0 

25D.G 
6.9 

4$ 



o.a 

1.0 



270.1 



4.1 
0,4 



0.0 
281,8 

278,0 
IB2.7 

0,3 

93.0 



Decembar 196d 



Millions 

of 
Rank Company Dollars Rank 

26. Honeywell, Inc. 250.6 

27. Collins Radio Co. 246.3 

28. Radio Corp. of 

America 242.1 

RCA Defense Elec- 
tronics Corp. 0.3 
Total 242.4 

29. International Tele- 

phone & Telegraph 

Corp. 120.3 

Barton Instrument 

Corp. 0.1 

Documat, Inc. 0.4 

Federal Electric Corp. 67.6 

ITT Gilfillan, Inc. 39.2 

ITT Technical 34. 

Services, Inc. 1.6 

ITT Terryphone 

Corp. 0.2 

Jennings Radio Mfg. 

Corp. 0.6 

Total 219.8 

30. Litton Industries, 

Inc. 13.2 

Airtron, Inc. 0,1 

Analogue Controls, 

Inc. 

Clifton Precision 

Products Co., Inc. 0.2 

Ingalls Shipbuilding 

Corp. 46.9 

Litton Precision 

Products, Inc. 6.6 

Litton Systems, Inc. 162.0 

Mellonics Systems 

Development, Inc. 0.1 

Monroe Calculating 

Machine-Gorr Inc. 0.1 

Monroe Intl., Inc. 0.1 

P S Corp, 
U.S. Engineering 

Co., Inc. (U 

Total 219.4 

31. Standard Oil Co. 

(New Jersey) 0.0 

American Cryogenics, 

Inc. 1.4 

Esso International, 

Inc. 129.3 

Esso Research & 

Engineering Co. 1.5 

Esso Standard 

Eastern, Inc. 17.2 

Esso Standard Oil 

Co. (Puerto Rico) 1.2 

Humble Oil & 

Refining Co. 63.4 

Total 214.0 

32. Ryan Aeronautical 

Co., 69.7 

Continental Aviation 

& Engineering 41. 

Corp. 29.6 

Continental Motors 

Corp. 98.6 

Wisconsin Motor 

Corp. 1.8 

Total 199.6 

33. General Telephone 

& Electronics 

Corp. 0.0 

Automatic Electric Co. 5.6 

Automatic Electric 

Sales Corp. 5.1 42. 

California Water & 

Tel. Co. 0.1 



36. 
36. 



37. 



38. 



89. 
40, 



Company 

General Telephone & 

Electronics 

Laboratories, Inc. 
General Tel. Co. of 

Fla. 
General Telephone 

Co. of Puerto Rico 
General Telephone Co. 

of the Southeast 
Lenkurt Electric 

Co., Inc. 
Sylvania Electric 

Products, Inc. 
West Coast Tel. Co. 

Total 

International Busi- 
ness Machines 

Corp. 
Science Research 

Associates 
Service Bureau Corp. 

Total 
Olin Mathieson 

Chemical Corp. 
Pan American 

World Airways, Inc. 
Pan American Grace 

Airways 

Total 

FMC Corp. 
Gunderson Bros. 

Engineering Corp. 

Total 
du Pont (B. I.) de 

NeinoiirB & Co. 
Remington Arms 

Co., Inc. 

Total 

Chrysler Corp, 
Standard Oil Co. 

(Calif.) 

California Oil Co. 
Cftltex Oil Products 

Co. d 
Caltex Philippines, 

Inc." 

Chevron Asphalt Co. 
Chevron Chemical Co. 
Chevron Oil Co. 
Community Oil Co., 

Inc. 
Hoffman Fuel Co., 

Inc. 
Independent Gasoline 

& Oil Co. of 

Rochester 
Standard Oil Co. of 

Kentucky 
Standard Oil Co. of 

Texas 

Total 
Goodyear Tire & 

Rubber Co. 
Goodyear Aerospace 

Corp. 

Goodyear Interna- 
tional Co. 
Kelly-Springfield 

Tire Co. 
Lee Tire & Rubber 

Co, 
Motor Wheel Corp. 

Total 

Hercules, Inc. 
Haveg Industries, 
Inc. 



Millions 

of 
Dollars 



0.1 



0.1 

4.1 

181.3 



44, 



46. 



46. 



47. 



196.4 

180.8 

0.1 

0.7 

181.6 

173.0 
170.0 



170.0 
162.6 

0.1 
162.6 

20.4 

140.7 
161,1 
1G0.2 

84.1 
0.8 

39.7 

0.1 
0.1 
0.3 



0.8 48. 
49. 



10.9 

4.8 
141.1 

60.9 

78.5 

0.1 



0.1 
0.9 

130.6 
118.6 

1.8 



Rank Company 

M H D Research, 
Inc. 

Total 
43. General Precision 

Equipment Corp. 
Controls Co. of 

America 
General Precision 

Decca Systems, 

Inc. 
General Precision, 

Inc. 

Graflex, Inc. 
National Theatre 

Supply Co. 
Strong- Electric Corp. 
Tele -Signal Corp. 

Total 

Thioltol Chemical 
Corp. 

Nor r is -Therm ador 

Corp. 
Pyr-Fyter Co. 

Total 

Texaco, Inc. 
Caltex Oil Products 

Co.* 
Caltex Philippines, 

Inc. d 
Jefferson Chemical 

Co., Inc. 
Paragon Oil Co. 
Texaco Caribbean, 

Inc. 
Texaco Experiment, 

Inc. 

Texaco Export, Inc. 
Texaco Puerto Rico, 

Inc. 

Texaco Trinidad, Inc. 
White Fuel Co., Inc. 

Total 
Signal Oil and Gas 

Co. 

Garrett Corp. 
Southland Oil Corp, 
Space Petroleum 

Corp. 

Total 

TRW, Inc. 
Lear-Sleg-ler, Inc. 
American Avitron, 

Inc. 
Astek Instrument 

Corp. 

CimroTi Corp. 
Hokanson, (G. G.) 

Co., Inc. 
Lear-Siegler Service, 

Inc. 

Total 

50. Mobil Oil Corp. 
61, Eastman Kodak Co. 
Eastman Kodak 

Stores, Inc. 
Record ak Corp. 

Total 
52. Bethlehem Steel 

Corp. 
Bethlehem Steel 

Export Corp. 
Calmar Steamship 

Corp. 

Total 



Millions 
of 

Dollars 

0.2 



o.o 
o.s 



10S.1 
X.3 




110.7 




0.1 

3. a 
38.3 

0.4 
0.1 
O.7 

1OG.7 

5.O 

97.0 

O.O 

1.1 

1O5.4 

108. G 

89,0 

O.4 
0.4 



o.e 




Defense Industry Bulletin 



56. 
57. 



58. 
50, 
GO. 



61. 
62. 
63. 



85. 



66. 

67. 

68. 
69. 
70. 



71. 



72. 



73. 
74. 



Hank Company 
51 Curtiss-Wripht 

Corp. 
51. Asiatic Petroleum 

Corp. 

.55. Colt Industries, Inc. 
Chandler Evans, Inc. 
Colt's Inc. 
Colt's Patent Fire 

Arms Mfff. Co., Inc. 
Fairbanks Morse, Inc. 
Pratt & Whitney, Inc 

Total 

Magnavox Co. 
Harvey Aluminum, 

Inc. 

Hnrvey Aluminum 
Sales, Inc. 

Total 

Aerospace Corp. 
Fairchild Hiller Corp. 
International 

Harvester Co. 
Hough (Frank G.) Co. 
MacLeod & Co. 

Total 
Sanders Associates, 

Inc. 
Stevens (J. P.) & 

Co., Inc. 
Firestone Tire & 

Rubber Co. 
Dayton Tire & 
Rubber Co. 
Total 

United States 
Itubber Co. 
Masland Duraleather 

Co. 

U.S. Rubber Inter- 
national Corp. 
Total 
United States Steel 

Corp. 

Reactive Metals, Inc. 
Total 

American Electric, 
Inc. 

Chamberlain Corp. 
Teledyne, Inc. 
Hupp Corp. 
Condec Corp. 

Consolidated Avionics 
Corp. 

Consolidated Controls 
Corp. 

Total 

American Machine & 

Foundry Co. 
Cimo Engineering 

Corp. 
Voit(W.J.) R ubber 

Corp, 

Total 

Motorola, Inc. 
Motorola Communi- 

cations & 

Electronics, Inc. 
Motorola Overseas 

Corp. 

Total 

Western Union 
Aelegraph Co. 

V & Zimmerman, 
lac. ' 



Millions 

of 
Dollars 

91.1 

88.0 
4.5 

12.1 
0.1 

63.4 
4.6 
1.9 



86.6 
83.5 

32.6 

49.8 
82.4 
80.4 
80.1 

73.1 
1.7 
2.8 

77.6 

77.1 
75.8 
73,9 



74.5 



76. 



77 



78. 
79. 



80. 



81. 

82. 



S3. 
84. 



85. 
86. 



87. 




6.0 



90. 



91. 
92. 



93. 



Rank Company 
75. Sverdrup & Parcel, 

Inc. 
ARO, Inc. 

Total 

Union Carbide Corp. 
Englander Co., Inc. 
Korad Corp. 
Ocean Systems, Inc. 
Union Carbide 
Intemat'l., Inc. 
Total 

Newport News 
Shipbuilding & 
Dry Dock Co. 
Mass. Institute of 

Tech. 
Vitro Corp. of 

America 

Vitro Minerals & 
Mining Corp. 
Total 
Burlington Industries, 

Inc. 

Cleveland Woolens 
Erwin Mills, Inc. 
Klopman Mills, Inc. 

Total 
Johns Hopkins 

University 
Caterpillar Tractor 

Co. 
Towmotor Corp. 

Total 
General Time Corp. 

Texas Instruments, 
Inc. 

Metals & Controls, 
Inc. 

Total 
National Presto 

Industries 
Westinghouse Air 

Brake Co. 
Failing (George E.) 

Co. 
Le Tourneau- 

Westinghouse Co. 
Melpar, Inc. 
Wilcox Electric Co., 

Inc. 

Total 
Flying Tiger 

Line, Inc. 
American Manufac- 

turmg Co. of Texan 
fcmerson Electric Co. 
Rantec Corp. 

Total 

Atlantic Research 
Corp. 

Northeastern Engi- 

neering, Inc. 

Total 

Clark Equipment Co. 
universal American 

Corp. 

Amron Corp. 
Von Kohorn- 

Universal Corp 

Total 

Control Data Corp. 
Control Corp 



Millions 

of 
Dollars 



60.E 
E0.6 



Rank Company 

Rabinow Electronics, 
Inc. 

94. System Development 

Corp. 

95. Burroughs Corp. 
Burroughs Control 

Corp. 

Total 
06. Hayes International 

Corp. 

61.8 97, Bowen-McLauRhlln. 
York, Inc. 

98. Dow Chemical Co, 
Dow CoTiiingr Corp. 

Total 

99. Borg-Warner Corp, 
Morac Chain Co. 
York Corp. 

Total 
100. Continental Oil Co. 

American Agricul- 
tural GhomicR] Co, 

Dougrlas Oil Co. of 
Calif. 

Western Oil & Fuel 
Co. 



Mllllfri 
of 



52.3 

62.3 

48.6 

0.1 

1.1 

2.1 



61.6 

50.7 

49.3 

1.2 



60.5 

36.4 

2,4 

11.7 



Total 



JU 

40.1 

10.1 

-10.5 



_ 

fo. 



ToTa 

33.3 



0.8 



50,2 




47.2 




16.2 
18.0 



48,6 



41.7 



Footnotes 

"Not valuo of now procurement ac- 
tions minuet cancellations, tormimi- 
tions nncl other credit trmiKacllons. 
Ine data include debit nnrl credit lira- 
cnromont actions of $10,000 or more, 
under military supply, aorvfco nnrl c on- 
?T T j r, contr acts for work in tfia 
United States plus nwarcto to Ifatol 
companies and other U.S. com]nlc5 
for work overseas. 

Procurement actions fncludo defini- 
tive contracts, tlio obligated \m-tiom 
of letter contracts, purclmHo onlors, 
Job orders, task orders, dollvory onlen. 
n " v other orders t^ainst oxIstlnR 
^. -Tho data do not inr 1 - '- 
of indefinite qunntily ITUIIII 
that have not been translated into HIC- 
cine prclers on business flrmn, nor Ao 
tney include- purchase comntflmwl/i or 
Pending cancellations tlmt linvo ivot 
yet become mutually blndlnjr flroc- 
ments totweon tlio Govornmcnt S 
tno Company. 

assignment of subaldlnHcs (o 
"""ipanlea ia based on stock 
of 60 percent or more by 
ipany, as indicated by 

, sources. Tho company totata 
include contracts made by other 





? OD funda ' or 
"* 1 * 11 natlo through 



fltruc- 

of Juno SO, 
larioa an 

whic ? Pwcuremont actions 
been reported. 

Leas than $60,000. 

divided 



Corp. 




of 



-, 
ha l f of 

is s ? own 
parent companies, 



December 1966 




MEETINGS AND SYMPOSIA 



JANUARY 

Mission of Navy Laboratories 
Washington Area Briefing (Classi- 
fied J, at Naval Research Laboratory, 
Washington, D.C., Jan. 19. Sponsor: 
Washington Chapter of American 
Ordnance Assn. Contact: J. T. Ticer, 
Atlantic Research Corp., Alexandria, 
Va. 

Fifth Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 
Jan. 23-25, at Sta tier- Hilton Hotel, 
New York, N.Y. Sponsor : Ameri- 
can Institute of Aeronautics and As- 
tronautics. Contact: Jack Nielsen, 
General Chairman, P.O. Box 642, Los 
Altos, Calif. 94022. 

Symposium on Circuit Design by 
Computer, Jan. 30-31, at New York 
University, Bronx, N.Y. Sponsor: Of- 
fice of Naval Research. Contact: Cdr. 
[>. D. Kilpatrick, USN, Office of Na- 
ral Research, Department of the 
Navy, Washington, D.C. 20360, (Area 
3ode 202) OXford 6-3082. 

Second Annual Symposium on Non- 
Destructive Testing of Wolds, Jan. 
W-Peb. 2, at Chicago, 111. Sponsor: 
.llmois Institute of Technology. Con- 
act: T. F. Drouillard, ITT Research 
.nstitute, 10 West 35th St., Chicago, 
.11. 60616. ' 

FEBRUARY 

Winter Convention on Aerospace 
ind Electronic Systems, Feb. 7-9, at 



AMC Gets Instant 

Procurement Information 

Computer 

A computer-equipped system which 
Tovides instant information on pro- 
urement actions throughout the 
Limy Materiel Command (AMC) has 
een Inaugurated at the Army Elec- 
conica Command, Fort Monmouth, 
I.J. 

When in full operation the system. 
ailed Standard Work Ordering: and 
Sporting Data System (SWORDS), 
ill establish a data bank of con- 
actual information at every AMC 
istallation involved In providing or 
sing work ordering service. 

Another function of the system 
rovides instant communication be- 
*een all AMC elements and the 
'efense Contract Administration 
ervices on daily procurement actions, 
iformation on the actions can be fed 
ito one installation's computer by 
iagnetic tape or punch cards and be 
nmediately available at the others, 

'ofense Industry Bulletin 



Intei-national Hotel, Los Angeles, 
Calif. Sponsor: Institute of Electrical 
and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 
Contact: IEEE, 346 East 47th St., 
New York, N.Y. 10017. 

Institute of Navigation 1967 Na- 
tional Air Meeting on Collision Avoid- 
ance, Feb. 23-24, at Dayton, Ohio. 
Sponsor: Institute of Navigation. Con- 
tact: Capt, Ross E. Freeman, USN 
(Ret.), Executive Director, Institute 
of Navigation, Suite 912, 711 14th St., 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005, (Area 
Code 202) 783-329G. 

Systems Effectiveness Conference, 
Feb. 28-March 1, at Statler-Hilton 
Hotel, Los Angeles, Calif. Sponsor; 
Electronic Industries Assn. Contact: 
Robert B. Redfeni, Electronic Indus- 
tries Asan., 2001 Eye Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20006 
a 

MARCH 

Syposium on Modern Optics, March 
22-24 (revised date), New York City, 
Sponsors: Air Force Office of Sci- 
entific Research, Office of Naval 
Research and Army Research Office, 
Contact: Lt. Col. E. P. Gaines Jr., 
(SREE), Air Force Office of Scientific 
Research, Tempo D, 4th and Inde- 
pendence Ave., S.W., Washington D.C. 
20338, (Area Code 202) OXford 6- 
3671. 



Two New DCASO's 

Established 

The Defense Supply Agency (DSA) 
has established new Defense Con- 
tract Administration Services Offices 
(DGASO's) in Orlando, Fla., and 

Huntsville, Ala. 

rt A DCASO located at The Martin 
Co., P. O. Box 6837, Orlando, Fla. 
32806, will administer contracts at 
the Martin plant. The Martin plant 
is currently producing on' several 
major DOD systems Including the 
Sprint, Walleye, Bullpup and Per- 
shing weapon systems. 

The Huntsville DCASO, located at 
2109 W. Clinton St., HuntsvlUe, Ala, 
8G806, will administer both National 
Aeronautics and Space Administra- 
tion (NASA) and DOD contracts in 
the .heavily industrialized area in and 
around Huntsville. NASA contracts 
will comprise the bulk of the new 
DGASO's contracts. 

Both new offices are part of 
the Defense Contract Administration 
Services Region, Atlanta, 



APRIL 

Biomcchanics Symposium, April G-6, 
at Augustana College, Rock Island, 
111. Sponsors: Rock Island Army 
Arsenal, Army Weapons Command, 
Army Research Office-Durham and 
Auguatana College. Contact; Prof. 
John E, Ekblad, Auguatana College, 
Roek Island, 111. 61201. 

Annual Frequency Control Sym- 
posium, April 24-26, at the Shel- 
burne Hotel, Atlantic City, N.J. 
Sponsor: Army Electronics Command. 
Contact: Director, Electronic Compo- 
nents Laboratory, Army Electronics 
Command, Attn: AMSEL-KL-SR 
(Mr. M, F, Timm), Fort Monmouth, 
N.J. 07703, (Area Code 201) 635-2826 
or 635-1728 



USAF Develops Tiny 
Image Storing Device 

A device that theoretically could 
store an entire motion picture the 
size of "Gone With the Wind" on one 
crystal no bigger than a sugar cube 
has been developed by Air Fores 
Systems Command bionics scientists 
at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. 

The experimental model uses a 
helium neon laser to bleach a photo- 
graphic slide onto the purple- colored, 
potassium bromide crystal. By turn- 
ing tho crystal slightly, another 
image can bo recorded. Incremental 
changes would permit storage of 
several hundred thousand items. 

Air Force Avionics Laboratory, a 
unit of Systems Command's Research 
and Technology Division, developed 
the process which is officially called 
a Multiple Imago Storage Device. 

By removing the eyepiece from a 
microscope focused on 85mm slides 
stored on the crystal, images can be 
crudely displayed on a projection 
screen. 

The device is basically one of 
several bionics-type endeavors to 
duplicate the high-density "packag- 
ing" of nature typified in the human 
brain, which has about 10 billion 
neurons, or nerve cells. 

Thus far only two dimensional 
slides of writing or objects have been 
bleached onto tho .crystal Future 
experimentation will be directed to- 
ward storing three dimensional or 
hologram-type slides and improving 
the methods of removing slides from 
the crystal. 



23 




The Omnibus Rivers and Harbors 
ar.-j Flood Control Act of 19(36 author- 
lies the Army Corps of Engineers to 
construct, modify, or otherwise par- 
ticipate in the provision of 42 flood 
control, navigation, water conserva- 
tion and other water resources proj- 
ects, having an estimated Federal cost 
of 1670,235,000. 

This includes 27 flood control (in- 
cluding multiple-purpose) projects at 
a cost of $6-15,352,000; 11 navigation 
projects at an estimated Federal cost 
of $17,872,000; and four beach erosion 
Projects at an estimated Federal cost 
of 17,011,000. The act authorizes 12 
surveys for flood control and allied 
purposes and two surveys in the in- 
terest of navigation and beach erosion 
control. 

The new Omnibus Act also raises 
he yearly limit of ?2,500,000 author- 
ized by the Flood Control Act of 1960 
ns amended, for flood plain informa- 
tion studies and advice on flood plain 
management to $7,000,000. 

A listing of new construction and 
other authorizations with description 
and estimated Federal cost, where 
appropriate, follows. The initials be- 
fore the project descriptions indicate: 

BP ^ ga i 10il)f FC (fiood control )i 
"* (beach erosion control); MP 

(multiple-purpose), and HFC (hurri- 
cane flood control). 

(tegend. The sequence of (he list- 
'" X. Location. 2. D. 



FLORIDA 

Gulf County Canal. (N) Shallow 
draft channel. $477,000. 

Mullet Key. (BE) Shore protection. 
$286,000. 

Pinellas County, (BE) Shore pro- 
tection works. $116,000, 

St. Lucie Inlet. (N) Channel main- 
tenance and navigation aids, 

GEORGIA 

Savannah River. (MP) Trotters 
Shoals Reservoir. $84,900,000. 

IDAHO 

Boise River and tributaries, vicin- 
ity of Boise. (PC) Cottonwood Creek 
and Stuart Gulch Reservoirs. $1,676 - 
000. 



MISSOURI 

Meramcc Rfvor. (PC) Pino Fj 
Irondale and 1-3 B IttiHorvoirHj ang 
use sites for rocrcationnl arena a 
facilities. $45,971,000, 

Mississippi R i v n r - A g v iv\\ I tur, 
Areas Milo 10D to Milti IJOO nta 
Ohio River. (FC) Lovcos ami puijipJi, 
plants. $7,193,000. 

NEW JERSEY 

Newark Hay, Ilnckcnsanlc mid I'm 
snic Rivers. (N) Donp rtriifl rliniiiu 
improvements and ninnauvcrhiK nw.ii 
for Newark Bay; shallow tlrnft chan- 
nel improvements for llaclccn^cl 
River. $12,899,000, 

NEW YORK 

Rod Creak, Monroo County, (t'C) 
Local flood protection, $1,430,000. 



IOWA 

Mississippi RiverFort Madison 
Harbor. (N) Access channel and ma- 
neuvering area. $975,000. 

KENTUCKY 

Little Sandy River and Tygarts 
tireek. (MP) Kehoe Reservoir ffilfi. 
000,000. ' * ' 

Salt River. (MP) Taylorsville Res- 
ervoir. $24,800,000. 

LOUISIANA 

Ouachita River at Monroe. (FC) 
flood protection 



ARKANSAS 

Bayou Bartholomew. (FC) Levees 
and imall reservoirs. ?9,360,000 
CALIFORNIA 

Klamath 



Pajaro 



Teche-Vermilion Basins. (PC) Di- 
ver S10 n of water from Atchafolaya 
River to Te ch, Ve r m ilion basin, ^ 

Baton Rouge. (FC) Bank revetment. 
MASSACHUSETTS 
North Nashua River Basin. (FCl 

onoOSnOG RvnnL- XT i ^ ' 

Nook aee Whit- 






w 

San Diego (Sunset Cliffs) 

000 



MICHIGAN 



CONNECTICUT 







?630,00ff. 



and 

Pearl River. 



NORTH CAROLINA 

Beaufort Inlet to . 

(HFC) Dikes and drnimjcro ntrucdim 
$320,000. 

Bogiio Inlot to Mooro Inlot. (HFC) 
Shore protection works for T 
Bench and Surf City. $l,2'J0 h OOO. 
Cftpo Fear Rivor to North Cflr 
and South Caroliim atntn Him. (HFC) 
Shore protoetlon works for Yoii|)on, 
Long, Holdon, Ocean Into and Sunset 
Beaches. $12,310,000. 

Mainland Areas, N.C, (IIF) 
Earthen dike with drain ago mid navi- 
gation structures. ?2 t O'I8 ( 000. 

Ocracolco Inlot to Beaufort Inlet, 
(BE) Shore protection worta). $5,805,- 
000, 

Carolina Beacfi Harbor, (N) Main- 
tenance of harbor olmnnola. 

Southport Harbor. (N) Mnlnknnnce 
of channel turning bnsht for wimll 
boat hnrbor. 

Outer Banka-Vlrfflnln atato lino lo 
Hattoras Inlot. (HFC) Shore prok-o 
Won works for Kitty Hnwlt, Kill DovJI 
wills and Wage Hoiid. 30,052,000. 
OHIO 

Coimeaut Harbor. (N) Sholloiv 
draft navigation and recreational ftn- 
pi'ovemonts, $406,000. 

Maumco Rlvor at Ottawa. (FC) 
^ocal flood protection. $3.413,000. 
PENNSYLVANIA 

Elk Creek Harbor, (N) Shallow 
draft navigation and recreational Inv 
provementa. $920,000. 
TEXAS 

Ark ansas and Bed Rivers, water 
quality control, Part I. (FG) Wichita 
Jiiver project to control naturnl 
(Continued Inaide Back Cover) 



December 19W 




The publications listed below 
may be obtained at the following 
addresses : 

DOD Directives and Instructions: 
Publication Distribution Branch 
Office of the Secretary of De- 
fense 

Boom 3B 200, The Pentagon 
Washington, D.G. 20301 
Defense Procurement Circulars: 

Distribution is made automatic- 
ally to subscribers of the Armed 
Services Procurement Regulation 
by the Government Printing Office 
Office. 

Research Reports : 

Authorized DOD contractors and 
grantees ma y obtain these docu- 
ments without charge from; 

Defense Documentation Center 

Cameron Station 

Alexandria, Va. 22314 

Others may purchase these doc- 
uments at the price indicated 
from ; 

Clearinghouse for Federal and 

Scientific Information 
Department of Commerce 
Springfield, Va. 22151 



DOD Directives 
and Instructions 

DOD Directive. 5160.57, "Electro- 
magnetic Compatibility Analysis Cen- 
ter (ECAC)," Sent. 23, 196G. Pre- 
scribes the mission, functions, 
responsibilities, operational relation- 
ships, and the management arrange- 
ment for the joint DOD Electro- 
magnetic Compatibility Analysis 
Center. 

DOD Instruction 5210.51, "Security 
Classification Concerning Airborne 
Passive Scanning Infrared Imagine 
Systems," Oct. 25, 1966. Prescribes 
uniform standards and criteria for 
classifying information pertaining to 
certain airborne passive infrared imag- 
ing systems; levels of capability of 
auch imaging systems at and below 
which operating data can be disclosed 
without jeopardizing national defense; 
and general guidance governing the is- 
suance of specific classification guides 
for individual imaging systems. 

DOD Instruction 5410.15, "Delinea- 
tion of DOD Audio-Visual Public Af- 
fairs Responsibilities and Policies," 
Nov. 3, 1966. Delineates DOD respon- 
sibilities and policies on releasing 
DOD-generated audio-visual material 
to the public and furnishing assistance 
to non-Government agencies involved 
in the production of audio-visual ma- 
terials insofar as they help sustain 
public understanding of DOD. 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



Defense Procurement 
Circulars 

Defense Procurement Circular No. 
49, Oct. 31, 1966. (1) North Carolina 
Sales and Use Tax Refunds Applica- 
ble to Construction Contracts. (2) 
Identification of Expenditures in the 
United States. (3) Equal Employment 
Opportunity. (4) Contractor Team Ar- 
rangements, (6) Organizational Con- 
flicts of Interest. (6) List of Educa- 
tional or Non-Profit Institutions With 
Approved Patent Policies. 

Research Reports 

Fiber Reinforced Thermo-Plastics: 
Applications, Molding Techniques, and 
Performance Data. Picatinny Arsenal, 
Dover, N.J., Sept. 1966, 90 p. Order 
No. AD-637 721. $3 

The Synthesis of Special Fluorine- 
Containing Monomers, University of 
Colorado, for the Army, Jan. 1966, 117 
p. Order No. AD-63fl 217. $4. 

Geometrical Effects of Filament 
Twist on the Modulus and Strength of 
Graphite Fiber Reinforced Composites. 
Air Force Materials Laboratory, Sept. 
1988, 18 p. Order No. AD-638 299. $1. 

Localized Necking- in Anisotroplc 
Titanium Sheet Tensile Specimens. 
Army Materials Research Agency. 
July 196G, 17 p. Order No. AD-638 
298. $1. 

Effect of Tungsten Composition on 
the Mechanical Properties of the W- 
Ni-Fe Heavy Alloy. M.I.T., for the Air 
Force, Sept. 1966, 37 p. Order No. AD- 
638 fi20. 2. 

The Operation of Brittle Fracture 
Mechanisms In Ductile Metal Compos- 
ites. M.I.T., for the Air Force, Sept, 
19G6, 24 p. Order No. AD-638 621. $1. 

Report on the Mechanical and 
Thermal Properties of Tungsten and 
TZM Sheet Produced in the Refractory 
Metal Sheet Rolling Program Part I. 
Southern Research Institute. Birming- 
ham, Ala., for the Navy, Aug. 1966, 
200 p. Order No. AD-638 631. $5. 

Irig Standard Coordinate System 
and Data Formats for Antenna Pat- 
terns. White Sands Missile Range, 
N.M., May 1966, 106 p. Order No. AD- 
637 189. $4. 

Noise Measurements as a Tool in 
Electron Device Research. University 
of Minnesota, for the Army. Sept. 
1966, 204 p. Order No. AD-638 297. 
$6. 

Application of Computers to RF 

Circuit Design, Final Report. Applied 
Technology, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif., 
for the Army, Sept. 1966, 133 p. Order 
No. AD-637 600. $4. 



Microwave Semiconductor Oscilla- 
tor and Amplifier. Army Electronics 
Command, Port Monniouth, N.J., Aug. 
1966, 31 p. Order No. AD-638 729. $2. 

Preparation of Thin-Film Tunneling 
Structures. Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Fort Monmouth, N.J.. Aug. 
1966, 28 p. Order No. AD-638 416. $2. 

Micro-Notes, Information on Micro- 
electronics for Navy Equipment. Naval 
Air Systems Command. Sept. 1966, 86 
p. AD-639 091. $3. 

A Temperature Compensating Pre- 
amplifier for Driving Long Coaxial 
Lines in Scintillation Spectroscopy Ap- 
plications. Naval Radiological Defense 
Laboratory, San Francisco, Calif., 
Aug. 1966, 38 p. Order No. AD-635 
882. $2. 

The Preparation of Oriented Single 
Crystal Spheres of Intel-metallic Com- 
pounds Between the Rare Earth and 
Iron Group Metals. Perkin-EImer 
Corp., Norwalk, Conn., for the Air 
Force, Sept. 1966, 32 p. Order No. AD- 
637 803. $2. 

Qunrtz Crystal Units for Very High 
Frequencies. Army Electronics Com- 
mand, Fort Monniouth, N.J., April 
1966, 21 p Order No. AD-634 447. ?1. 

Electronic Packaging: A Bibliog- 
raphy. Battelle Memorial Institute, 
Columbus, Ohio, for the Army, March 
1966, 90 p. Order No. AD-634 004. $3. 

Research on Ocular . Effects Pro- 
duced by Thermal Radiation. Tech- 
nology Inc., for the Air Force, July 
1968, 148 p. Order No. AD-638 642. 
$4. 

High-Yield Reactions to Introduce 
Aldehyde Groups into Pyridine Deriv- 
atives. Ash Stevens Inc., Detroit, 
Mich,, for the Army, May 1966, 61 p, 
Order No. AD-68G 11&. $1,50. 

Some Exploratory Experiments on 
Laser Explosions in Pseudo-Air. Naval 
Ordnance Laboratory, White Oak, Md., 
March 1966, 31 p. Order No, AD-632 
484. $2. 

High-Current Pulse Generator for 
Gallium Arsenide Laser, Army's Harry 
Diamond Laboratories, Washington. 
D.C., April 1966, 14 p. Order No. AD- 
634 507. $1. 

NRL Progress in High-Power Laser 
Research. Naval Research Laboratory, 
Washington, D.C., June 1966, 44 p. 
Order No. AD-G37 616. $2, 

Rubies for Reference Temperature 
Standards, Lexington Laboratories, 
Cambridge, Mass., for the Air Force, 
Sept. 1986, 63 p. Order No. AD-640 
177. $3. 

The Investigation of the Prepara- 
tion and Evaluation of High Purity 

Elemental Boron, Eagle-Picher Indus- 
tries, Miami, Okla., for the Air Force, 
Aug. 1966, 78 p. Order No, AD-639 
646. $3. 




by 

Hugh J. Gownley 



From the early days of the reacti- 
vation and buildup of the modern 
German armed forces in 1956, discern- 
ing defense authorities, both German 
and American, became acutely aware 
of the importance of cooperative logis- 
tics to support, on a sustained bask, 
the men and weapons associated with 
the buildup of viable North Atlantic 
Treaty Organisation (NATO) defense 
forces. As the NATO armed forces 
grew, many German and American 
officials became painfully aware that, 
while money could be provided to buy 
modern and sophisticated weapons, it 
was not as easy to provide for the 
support necessary to maintain an op- 
erationally ready force. 

In the spring of 1961, with the 
knowledge that international logistics 
cooperation was not a reality, DOD 
officials approached the Ministry of 
Defense of the Federal Republic of 
Germany (PEG) and proposed that 
the United States provide logistics 
assistance to the Federal Republic. 
This proposal was made because U.S. 
military authorities recognized that 
lack of modern equipment and logis- 
tica support for German divisions 
fighting alongside U.S. divisions 
created a situation which was not 
militarily acceptable to either Ger- 
many or the United States. 

The proposal -was found to be most 
interesting: to the German government. 
During the spring and summer of 
1961, therefore, a series of joint con- 
ferences was held to determine specifi- 
cally the hinds of logistics support 
that the Federal Republic of Germany 
needed, and which the United States 
could provide. The work accomplished 
in these joint conferences led ulti- 
mately to the first Cooperative Logis- 
tics Agreement between Germany and 
the United States in October 1961. 
Through this agreement, the United 
States was to provide logistics assist- 
ance in the fields of procurement 
services, depot supply support, depot 
maintenance, training, storage and 
provision of emergency medical serv- 
ices. The agreement was reaffirmed 
in September 1962 and in May 1964 
by Secretary McKamara and Minister 

26 



van Hassel. The latter agreement 
covered the years 1965-1966, 

What has been accomplished by the 
aforementioned agreements is unique 
in military history. At no time in the 
past have two sovereign nations 
wedded their military logistics systems 
to the point where support is pro- 
vided on an equal basis. To understand 
the real meaning of this cooperative 
support, however, one must look at 
some of the specific areas involved. 

Supply Support. Supply support for 
most of the U.S.-produced major 
Army weapon systems in the German 
Army's inventory is accomplished 
through the U.S. Army supply system 
in the continental United States and 
in Europe. This means that German 
Army requisitions prepared on U.S. 
forms are dispatched electronically 
into the U.S. Army system and are 
processed in the same manner as 
requisitions from the U.S. Army units. 
Materiel to fill these requisitions is 
procured, shipped, stored and issued 
from U.S. Army depots, again in the 
same fashion as materiel is handled 
for U.S. Army units. There is no seg- 
regation of stock for German or 
American customers and in every re- 



spect Gel-man Army units eafa 
same degree of support as (a f- te 
American units of equal prlorilf-- 
port for the German Navy d 
German Air Force hna been dtfi.'. 
(although in lesser volume) f' 
comparable lines, Tliese slgr-fo 
statistics illustrate the past t 
future accomplishments in this w. 

Line items of requfettfon* P 

essedFY 1961-60: 181,4-U 

Line items of requisitions o 
mated FY 1967-70; over 200,000 

Training Support, The need for & 
quate training space )ms btf a t~'- 1 
tinning concern to the German trztf 
forces. The United States has l#' 
sharing training timo nt German t- 
stallations and lias operated wra* U 
major training facilities In the Url'rf 
States for the German Avmy and Air 
Force. Some of the 
this area are: 




Hugh J. Gownley is Dep. for Man- 
agement to the Dcp. Asst. Secretary 
of Defense (International Logistics 
Negotiations), Office of Asst. Secre- 
tary of Defense (International Secu- 
rity Affairs). He also supervises the 
activities of the Federal Republic of 
Germany, European and Latin Amer- 
ican Directorates. 



* Over 2,000 Air 
have been trained in the Uviitci! Slita 
in the last five years with many rnta 
to come. 



Almost 16>QOO Army 
students were trained In tlw 
States with 10,000 planned for tte 
future, 

Over 3,000 Naval students wo* 
trained in tlie United Slntcs m(i 
2,000 more planned for the future. 

Over 961 battalion weeks of lull- 
ing time was provided to the 6o 
Army at U.S. training areas In But- 
ope with over 1,500 planned lor fci 
future. 

Procurement Support, Anottior rii* 
nificant logistic service which the 
United States performs for the Fed- 
eral Republic of Germany Involves 
procurement support, The German* 
have asked for this procurement as- 
sistance because they do not have Hie 
personnel to administer the very tewe 
volume of German defense miwtt 
purchased in the United States, Tto 
kinds of procurement services, to ad- 
dition to contract negotiation aw. 
audit services, inspection, quality con- 
trol, and the acquisition of WPP P 
ate publications or manuals, Some in- 
teresting statistics in this ares 
include; 

Over 4,000 man year* of procure- 
ment, audit, contract and other types 
of services have been provided. 

Over 3,000 man years are plam*l 
for the future. 



December 



Maintenance Support. U.S. .Army 
maintenance facilities in Ger- 
many are now used to overhaul, repair 
and rebuild American equipment held 
by German forces. The maintenance 
requirements of the Germany Army 
are programmed in advance along 
with U.S. requirements so that Ger- 
man and U.S. equipment can be seen 
passing through the same overhaul 
line In a U.S. facility, receiving the 
same quality of repair and timely re- 
turn to the users. Pacts worth noting 
include the following; 

o Over 50 major types of Army 
equipment are maintained by U.S. fa- 
cilities for the German Army. 

* Complete shipyard support is pro- 
vided for German Naval destroyers of 
an American type. 

Almost 2,000,000 man hours of 
maintenance time has been provided 
to the German Army by U.S. forces. 

* Over 2,600,000 man hours are 
planned for the future. 

Storage, Administration and Train- 
ing Space. A separate procedural ar- 
rangement has been instituted for the 
Joint utilization of facilities belonging 
to the United States which can be put 
at the disposal of the German armed 
forces. Requirements expressed by the 
Federal Republic of Germany are re- 
viewed by the U.S. European Com- 
mand, available space is identified, 
offers and acceptances are exchanged 
with Germany, and specific agree- 



ments are then negotiated. A signifi- 
cant statistic in this area is: 

Over 500,000 square feet of space 
is shared with Germany at U.S. fa- 
cilities in Europe, 

Research and Development Coopera^ 
tion. A cooperative research and de- 
velopment program, bringing together 

the top engineers and scientists of 
both countries, has been developed. 
This cooperation involved : 

Development of a new main battle 
tank for the 1970's with over $150 
million of development cost shared by 

the two countries. 

Studies of vertical take-off and 
short take-off aircraft for the 1970's 
with the cost of these studies shared 
by both countries. 

Over 116 technical data exchange 
agreements by which the United 
States provides technical data to Ger- 
mans on subjects covering military 
technology. 

Today, in Germany, five U.S. di- 
visions, together with 12 German di- 
visions, constitute the principal NATO 
deterrent against any aggression from 
the East. This combined force is made 
significantly stronger by the support 
provided by the cooperative logistic 
system that has been developed during 
the past five years, Germany and the 
United States have shown that co- 
operation in logistics can work effec- 
tivelyand all of NATO is the bene- 
ficiary of this successful endeavor. 




O PJLOT TRAINING 

O MISSILE TRAINING SITES 

fr COMM SWITCHING CENTER 

DCSCOMMTRUNKCIRCUIT 



LOGISTICS COOPERATION WITH GERMANY IN THE UNITED STATES 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



Laser Memory Device 

Developed by USAF 

Scientists 

Scientists of the Air Force Systems 
Command's Research & Technology 
Div. (ETDJ have developed a laser 
beam device to serve as the "mem- 
ory" for experimental electronic sys- 
tems that could some day fly an 
aircraft or control satellite missions. 

Called an Optical Maze Runner, it 
is one of several efforts in RTD's 
Air Force Avionics Laboratory at 
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, to 
apply knowledge gained of living 
things to the solution of engineering 
problems. The maze runner is modeled 
after biological nerve patterns that 
store huge amounts of information 
for learning and. decision, 

In theory, it could be compared to 
a game of Parcheesi, with the sole 
"player" being a laser beam and with 
the part from "start" to "home" 
printed on a crystal about the size of 
a matchbook. 

To make sure the laser always 
"wins," Air Force scientists have 
stored 40,000 pieces of information, 
coded as right or wrong moves, on 
the purple- colored crystal, 

The device could replace more 
complicated memory systems used in 
some types of equipment. One of the 
advantages of using a laser beam as 
a maze runner is the ease involved 
in switching it off and on merely by 
interrupting the microscopic beam. 

The storage crystal, made of potas- 
sium bromide impregnated with 
hydrogen, is divided into four equal 
sections. Coded on one of these is the 
maze which offers four directional 
choices; left, right, up and down. 

Searching for correct information, 
or "ways out," the laser scans these 
choices much aa a person walks 
through hallways to get out of a 
building. Two other sections of the 
crystal record successful paths; tha 
fourth is a history of all points that 
have been encountered. 

The light source is supplied by two 
helium neon lasers one in the red 
spectrum, the other in the infrared 
which are split, then focused over the 
crystal sections in a parallel arrange- 
ment. 

Information is put on or taken off 
the crystal at the rate of one pie.ce of 
information a thousandth of a second. 
The technique used is similar to tha 
way some sunglasses change color 
when exposed to different intensities 
of ""light. When a laser in the red 
spectrum is directed onto the crystal, 
it bleaches out a small spot. If the 
information needs to be erased, an 
infrared beam re-colors the spot 
purple. 

Carson Laboratories of Bristol, 
Co.nn,, built the device under an Air 
Force contract with the Avionics 
Laboratory, 

27 



January-December 



Articles and Speeches 
Subject Index 

Tille 

ADVANCED PLANNING 

Advanced Planning Briefings, Defense 
KjwakKrc Announced for DOD-NSIA 

Procurement Planning System Makes Gov- 
ernment Business More Attractive, New 
Navy. By Capt. Joseph L. Howard, SC, 
USN 

ADVISORY GROUPS 

Army's Senior Scientific Advisors, The 

Defense Industry Advisory Council. By 

Clyde Bothmer 

AIRCRAFT 

Changes in the Arniy Aviation Program. 

By Col. Delhert L. Bristol, USA 
Intel-national Cooperation in the Deveolop- 

ment of Military Aircraft (Speech) By 

Ronald ,M. Murray _____ 

Planning for a Future Force Structure." 

(Sp^ch) By Gen. John P. McConnell, 

UhAr 

BUDGET 

Defense Budget Highlights (Statement by 
Secretary of Defense on FY 1967-71 
Program and the FY 1966-67 Budget) ___ 

Airlift and Sealift Forces 

Approach to the FY 1967-71 Program 

and the FY 1966-67 Budget 
General Purpose Forces 

Research and Development I 

Strategic Offensive and Defensive 
1'orces 

Financial Statemcn"ts7oVpY"l967"BudMt 

Supplemental Budget for Southeast Asia _" 
COMMUNICATIONS 

Communications-Electronics 
of Vietnam on the. 



PB. MO. 

14 Jan. 

4 Sept. 

7 April 

1 April 

20 Feb. 

15 Jan. 

11 Dec. 



1 Mar. 

19 Mar. 

1 Mar. 

9 Mar. 

21 Mar. 

6 Mar. 

27 Feb. 

1 Feb. 



By Lt. Gen. A. W. Betts, USA _ 
uelense Communications Satellite Pro- 



Lt 



Alfre " 



COMMUNISM 
Strategy of Communist China, The. 
By Gen. Creighton W. Abramsi 



CONSTRUCTION 



Authorizes Civil Works 



CONTRACTING 

Ai Rv F Tf C6 n I ! r T ire . m S lt ' An Overview of. 
qpp P Co1 - Jacob B. Pompan, USAF 
SPR Committee Case Listing _ ~~ 



Management Systems for 
cement. By Lt. Gen. W. 



4 Dec. 

6 May 
8 Dec. 

29 Mar. 
24 Dec 

10 Oct. 
39 Oct. 

30 Nov. 
33 Nov. 

1 Jan. 

19 Feb. 

20 Dec. 



Title 

Total Package Concept. By Maj. GGII. 

Charles H. Terhune, USAF 

Total Package Procurement Concept. By 

Col. Robert L. Lee, USAF _._.__ 

Two-Step Formal Advertising A Ca.se 

History. By Arthur W. Doherty 

COST EFFECTIVENESS 

Problem Mongers, Solution Mongers and 
Weapon System Effectiveness. By Paul 
J. Sturm 

System Analysis and Cost Effectiveness. 
By Russell Murray II _ 

COST REDUCTION 

Annual Cost Reduction Report Shows $4.f> 
Billion Savings in FY 196(5 

DATA 

Around the Horn from MIL-D~5028 to 
MIL-D-1000. By Jack L. Flippo _ 

Cost Information Reports, An Analysis of. 
By Chauncey H. Dean _.__ _ 

Data Standardization Progresses 

Economic Information System Reports 
Approved by Bureau of the Budget 

Navy Authorized Data List A Manage- 
ment Technique. By Albert N. Bayer 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING 

Agenda Set for DOD Education and Train- 
ing Conference _ 

Educational Technology. By Dr. Eugenes 
T. Ferraro 

Expanding Horizons Thi-ouffli" By-Mail " 

Instruction: The New Look of ICAP 
Correspondence School. By Maj. Gon. 
William S. Steolo, USAF, (Ret.) 

Government Agencies Seek Innovations in 
Education and Training. By Ro v K 
Davenport _ _ * 

Industry Cooperation SoughT'ro Improve"" 
Effectiveness of DOD Education and 
Training. By Thomas D, Morris 

ELECTRONICS 

AFSC Electronic Systems Division Role 



Ptf. Mo. 

:i Fflh. 

1.1 Aug. 

8 April 

1 July 
1 Hop*. 



f T -ecTOnM 

Effort. The Impact of Vietnam on the. 
By Lt. Gen. A. W. Eetts, USA 

tion BvTf n r : A Technological Kwoii"- 
tion. By Lt Gen. W. A. Dav a. USAF 

Military Information Process ng_Hcart 
Bv BZ m p nd a " d Inteljiffonco Systems. 
ffG - Culber, USAF . 



Kemoto Computing 
th 



Bv Cant 
" VJrt l J ' ; ' 

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 



II Jan, 

f5 April 

.17 Miiy 

Ifi .Tunn 

R June 



a;) Miiy 
Ifi Oct. 

i Autr. 

8 July 
18 April 

1G Auff. 

1 Dncr. 

14 July 

SO Oct. 

6 July 

19 Oct. 

8 Aug. 

20 Sopt. 



By Allan Reeves 10 Juno 



p w 

(.T. Wilson, 



December 1966 



'" '" T '"" P*. Mo. 

m -s M n.KAu TI-:STIN<; 

, lii.fu-lM :m.l 'I- !.:<<' !. ..nil..,' Hi' '|Y,-|),,,.],,j. yi Til... (Spi-.-di) 

" - ''"''"' ' " ' "'' . '" '' '""- " < : - Il.mn.-Uy, USAK 2 8 Oct 

KM'i'j.i'lmr. \H,.|, ],( Sllperi.inly, Hy dil. 

'-'"I'*' '- l.:.rm:.n. USAK ,1 M . iy 

I'M KAMM; 

''!>''".. . 1!) Junn 

;i(i Nov. 

I'l.u.i K.,iii|>iii..|ii :i;i Augi 

I'IMDIM I IIS 

i>. !< 11 i- M.il'-rinl:, SyM.'iii. |S|M'.'i-||) Hy 

H--J. U'.i.i'H A. Hr.'Miii ' lij |)(. r . 

I'. (< ir - Mnii-i i ill., Sy.ih-Hi a ml frinrilicsi, 

Hf. 11 v Ai.tli,.r)> A. H)Tl-;.']i I Nov. 

1 . ..) 1'MS din) I'l'iiirilifii hy Hi.' 1)01) 
iinl (i. {.II .- Ki-hitt-il Af;i'iit'if!i, 'rin>. Ity 
: M MLt-M.i ,lr. H Nov. 




I. An OviTvii'w iif. 
ii. M r.il, J (t H,l. H. I'onipiin, USAK 

'.' ( *)n r 1 ..itnl.l Aiiv.Tli:.i|l); Over till' 
Jh.n.l!. ... H\ Milt i'ii I-:. J'mivi 

\\ it LI }.' Mi-'tti ; '>:>!! in i |..r I'arknn'.' I'm- 

. -n ' in. 'ii! . I!'. 1 I .1. I i.'ll, \V, A. Dlivlli, 

1 \i 

!'l MM' I ' -tlf 1 :f ' A V.IU'.I., I'V Slillt' 

i'i . ii-.!!.!-M Miunui'-tiir-nl 'I'ri'ii.l^. (S|ii'i'i'IO 

lu .i-.tm M Mull-y 1H May 

i .t.,) r,,.;.;^;- run,-.'|.l. Hy Mnj. Ccn. 
' ! .,1:. H. T.-ilnni.- Jr., 1'SAF H Kdli. 

i ,' i 1 . !'. !,!.(('' I'l'iMir-'ini'tit ('.in. '.-ill. Hy 

< .. rt..i"-ii i:. i ,. I'SAK t n AUK- 

lii '.-I-,. H', Aitiiur W. linlitTly H April 

IMIIIJUT MANAt.'KMKNT 

-!(, -)!,. '.it ,.. Tl- NuM 1 ';'- Hy (Mr. It. (!. 
tr , , . r^ fi Jan. 

'/ Oct. 

mi i, i-..',v!. i. i ! - ^'^' ; 

\UV I'MMlIt I ;i 

i,,,'.'"' 1 ' 1 ln;0 ""-- -' " ' .,- ' . ";;;;;' i';; 1 , 1 ;,,,.. li; ; MM(. *;.-n. n. .t. sa.i.i,>i, 

,,. ..,.,.... i , ir Juno 



v/.' ""'' -" r- M. "iv, r, qi t M, x. P..IK ' . - 1ul y 

"V.r'MiiMu" 1 "^^' 1 -^ - , '' ' "i..i;V. M .V. V.-:i=jy, ny rapt. K, c. 

;.,n (l !.l M, .Mm*... =,- i j.ii.j. i ; .\, , I'SN' _ ' ! A l 1111 

y j^ii'iV. V;' 1 v< "' ; ' ' i '"'"' Ji ' - i--- ''V^/tiu-V^^'K^^^^^ l!) Od: - 

'"! li ':- |h ;v >1 ",V' ll!1 " 1 , ( ' : '"'" ' l! ' ; -, 3 . l '7' 1 '\ M ;V- 1 ''"'n 1 . 1 1 "!i'' l !i.j l '' vlt ' w: A n ""'" |I> 7 My 

v, ,,. i \\--.-,\ u 11 *- i i, A S*'ll" Apprni.'iul f 1 "'' 
"jj- ( ' *'>! ''.Inn'.-.. Haiti Jr.. PSA '* t' 1 ' 1 - 

! J' * 1=.' ... ,, .;,,; \ t'.ill.-iht Vlllll I" Mt'l't. 

>" '' ''- i--.'' '-- !i'.' ''al'l. IHi'li li- Wllsiiiil. ,, , 

,-..,, !. , ':;;', ' ' ;l(l SitpL. 

1 '' * > ' I'i ' M'tii'i^t'ini-iit (Spr.'i'li) 

KI/ATHIN "''urH..n."lV.i-M il.'i'lmi-l":' Id I' 1 *''*- 

Ui..i,t : uti-.T. M->i. *:.'. - i-. .-^-: f CtllAHIIHV 

Inv^v). 3 !!''-!-. , r ,,. .. ,. .,, Jt/^Jt'^rM'^Vi^ ^ K "" L 



\/' t" A.i "Viiv.- M'-.li'iil IHviiilon Plityw 

h. ^ 'I! -V 't MjlltH' 1 '! Klljtlll AilVHIH'I'H. 

H> Hrif-;. ll'-ii. ' hin'ifi M. v ,^j H^pt. 

^Ti.'u'.'tn.'nv"^'''- Jl ' h< " p - H|l(;tmm ' ll 



M April 

29 
Induilry Bullnlin 



Title 

Army RDT&E Communications-Electronics 
Effort, The Impact of Vietnam on the. 
By Lt. Gen. A. W. Betts, USA 

Army Research and Development, The 
Framework of. By Brig. Gen. R. B. Mar- 
tin, USA 

International Cooperation in the Develop- 
/ ment of Military Aircraft (Speech) By 
(Ronald M. Murray 

Frontier of Technology, The. (Speech) By 
Lt. Gen. H. C. Donnelly, USAF 

Management Trends in Defense Research 
and Development. (Speech) By James W. 
Roach 

Military Information Processing Heart 
of Command and Intelligence Systems. 
By Brig. Gen. A. T. Culbertson, USAF ___ 

Need for New Concepts for Surveillance 
and Target Acquisition. (Speech) By 
Hon. Willis M. Hawkins 

Planning and Management of the Navy 
RDT&E Program. By Capt. B. H. 
Andrews, USN 

Project Hindsight Measuring the Payoff 
of Research and Technology to Defense. 
(Speech) By Dr. Chalmers W. Sherwin - 

Space Technology Comes of Age (Speech) 
By Hon. Alexander H. Flax 

Translation of Today's Ideas into Tomor- 
row's Aerospace Weapon Systems. By 
Maj. Gen. Marvin C. Dernier, USAF 

SAIMS 

SAIMS, The Development of. By Col. Her- 
bert Waklman, USAF 

SAIMS, The Specification Approach and. 
'By Col. Herbert Waldman, USAF _ 

SECURITY 

Classification and Technical Breakthroughs. 
(Speech) By Frank Thomas 

SMALL BUSINESS 

Ideas t and Know-How Key to Small 

Business Success 

Subcontracting Program Spreads "Defense " 

Dollar Nationwide 



Title 



Code. PaJto identification! if Inside front cover; Ib Inalde 
back cover; bk bnck cover. 



ADVANCE PLANNING 

DSA Advanced Procurement Planning 1 Liat 
Program Established 

Procurement Counseling To Be Repented 
at Advanced Planning Briefings 

U.S. Marine Corps Advanced Procurement 
Information Available 

ADVISORY GROUPS 

Six New Members Join Defense Industry 
Advisory Council 



SOURCE SELECTION 

Importance of Responsibility Determina- 

o^T'.J^ 6 ' By Ca P t - Jose P" L - Howard, 
o(j, UoN 

SPACE 

Apollo Mission, The Navy's. By Cdr. R. C. 
Doxey, USN __ _ 

Space Technology Comes of Age7(SpeechT 
By Hon. Alexander H. Flax __!_ 



SYSTEM ANALYSIS 

System Analysis and Cost Effectiveness. 
By Russell Murray II 

SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS 

Problem Mongers, Solution Mongers and 

Weapon System Effectiveness. By Paul 

J. oturm 

By Lt. Gen. W. Austin Davis, USAF __'__ 
TESTING 
AFFTC Keyed to Future Requ 



Pg. Mo. 

4 Deo 

14 May 

16 Jan. 

28 Oct. 

11 July 
36 Oct. 
13 -Feb. 
22 Feb. 

12 Sept. 
27 Nov. 

6 Sept. 

20 July 
16 Oct. 

14 Sept. 

6 June 
19 Feb. 

9 Sept. 

5 Jan. 

27 Nov. 

1 Sept. 

1 July 
10 Feb. 



16 Nov. tract f r NIKE-X Research 
COST REPORTS 
IR_ Reports Approved 

U Aug. 



News Items Subject Index 



Vs. Mo. 



AIRCRAFT 

AF Shifts TF-39 Engine Management ___ 
Air Force and FAA Develop All-Weather 

Landing System for C-141 

Air Force Tests Propulsive Wing V/STOL" 

Model 

Army and Air Force Set Responsibilities" 

on Fixed and Rotary Wing Aircraft _ 
Boeing Selected To Develop and Produce 

SRAM 

Increased Tactical Aircraft Production"" 

Announced 

Modification of C-123 AircrafF Initiated" 

by AFLC 

Navy Accepts A-7A Corsair if ~ ~~__~ _II 

S T ^ AMA , Asai P :ned C ~ BA Repair Mission 

USAF Awards Contract for A-7D Attack 
Aircraft 

CHRISTMAS MAIL 

Deadlines for Christmas Gifts Sent Over- 
seas Set 

CIVIL DEFENSE 

Architects & Engineers Are Key to OCD 
fa holter Development Program 

fahelter Development Program Under Way' "I 

Two Handbooks on Civil Defense Emer- 
gency Available to Industry 

COMMUNICATIONS 



CONSTRUCTION 

Military Construction Deferred 
Navy Bureau of Yards and"bockfl 
Manages DOD Construction in SE Asia 
CONTRACTING 

Army Engineers Award Contracts To 
Study Reactor Concept _ 

SRAM tCd T Devel P and ~ Produce" 
" 



T ank Contract Awarded _ 
,n T f Award Contract on Command 
and Control Platform __ 

S?qAip M w rk i Rott< l op To Bo Sofected'for 
UfaAF Headquarters 

tract BUSineSa Fim Wina Hoater""0on~ 
U ~~"""" 



bk Juno 

if Jan. 
21 Apr, 

Wt Feb. 

21 Oct. 

18 Juno 

17 Oct. 

if May 

39 Nov. 

18 Oct. 

23 Apr. 
32 Nov + 
bk Apr. 

80 Nov. 
if Oct, 



20 Fob, 
2C Aiiff, 

8 Fob. 



SO Oct. 

IS Jtin. 

8 Jnn. 

S3 Nov. 

30 Nov. 

24 Juno 

Jon. 

17 Oct. 

lb Oct. 

7 Jan. 

39 Nov. 

24 Juna 

12 June 



Bureau of the Budget 



ib Oct, 

bk June 
IS June 



as. 



December 



Title 

ELECTRONICS 

Air Force Expands BTJIC Aerospace Con- 
trol System 

Missile Mentor Complex Undergoing 
Tests in Illinois 



FILMS 

"Why Vietnam" Film Available 

LOGISTICS 

Red Ball Express Again on the Move 

MANPOWER 

Defense Department Encourages Skill De- 
velopment and Training: of Nation's 
Manpower Resources 

Mobilization Designee Assignments Open 
in Ai-my R&D 

New Labor Dept. Standards Used in DOD 
Labor Surplus Area Programs 

Nurses Sought for Military 

Summer Job Program Announced by Sec. 
iDcf. Mio'Namara 

MEETINGS 

AFA Annual Meeting To Include Industry 
Briefing Program 

Agenda Announced for AOA Annual Meeting 

Agenda for DOD Education and Train- 
ing Conference 

Amphibious Warfare Classified Briefing 
Set 

AOA Annual Meeting Scheduled 

AUSA Schedules Annual Meeting 

Cost Information Reports Orientation 
Meeting Scheduled 

DOD Procurement Conferences Under Way 

Metalworking Technology To Be Subject 
of USAF Symposium at Las Vegas 

NATO Special Committee Working Group 
Meets in Washington 

Navy-Industry Conference on Systems 
Effectiveness 

Navy Schedules Systems Effectiveness 
Conference 

Operational Symposium Will Be Highlight 
of AHS Forum 

Procurement Conferences Set for Texas 
and Iowa 

USAF Avionics Lab Plans Classified Brief- 
ing 

USAF Electronics Briefing for Industry 
Postponed 

USAF Plans Electronics Briefings for 
Industry 

OCEANOGRAPHY 

Navy Aquanauts Get Permanent Home in 

San Diego 

Navy Collocates Oceanographic R&D Groups 

Navy DSSP Office Relocated 

Oceanographic Study Results Published 

ORGANIZATION 

AF Shifts TF-89 Engine Management 

Air Force Reorganizes TAG Centers 

Army-Air Force Exchange Service Will 

Move to Texas 

Army and Air Force Set Responsibilities 

on Fixed and Rotary Wing Aircraft 

Army Materiel Command To Reorganize 

Subordinate Units 

Army R&D Labs Get Microfilm Storage 

Facility 

Army to Organize Chaparral/Vulcan Air 

Defense Battalions 

Control of SYNCOM Earth Satellite Goes 

to STRATCOM 

DASA Information and Analysis Center 

Serves Nuclear Research Field 

Defense Industry Bulletin 



Par. Mo. 

18 June 

bk Oct. 

21 Jan. 

if May 

if July 

25 Feb. 

36 Feb. 

28 Mar. 

if June 



6 Aug. 

22 Aug. 

23 iMay 

21 Jan. 

10 July 

6 Aug. 

bk Apr. 

32 Sep. 

20 Oct. 
32 Mar. 

8 Sep. 

if Mar. 

23 Apr. 

21 Jan. 

22 Apr. 

24 June 
10 May 



bk Sep. 

6 May 

ib Oct. 

bk May 



21 Oct. 

if Sep. 

11 June 

if May 

if Sep. 

if Oct. 

23 Apr. 

SO Oct. 

10 May 



TittB 

DGAA Opens Contract Audit Institute at 

Memphis 

DCASR Activation Completed 

Defense Electronic Supply Center Strives 

for Reliability and Economy 

DLSC Establishes Codification Division 

DOD Creates 'New Directorate To Deal 

with Food Policies 

Eglin APB Unit Redesigned as Lab 

Eight New Members Appointed to Defense 

Science Board 

European Command Headquarters Will 

Move to Germany 

Famed Radar Scientist Joins Army Elec- 
tronics Command 

Gurnee to Head Contractor Cost Reduction 

Program 

ICEM Reutilization Program To End 

Marine Corps Activating New Division at 

Camp Pendleton 

MATS Now MAC 

MBT-70 Project Test .Organization Estab- 
lished 

Medical Research Labs Combine at 

WPAFB 

Navy Aquanauts Get Permanent Home in 

San Diego 

Navy Collocates Ocean ographic R&D Groups 

Navy DSSP Office Relocated 

Navy Reorganization Briefings Set 

Navy Reorganizes Material Command 

Structure 

NORAD Reorganization To 'Become Effec- 
tive April 1 

Nuclear Vulnerability Assessment Respon- 
sibility Assigned to AFSWC 

SAAMA Assigned C-OA Repair Mission 

SMC-AMC Consolidated 

Springfield Armory To Be Phased Out 

PRICE CONTROL 

Price Increase for Quinine and Quinidine 
Subject of Senate Hearing 

PROCUREMENT 

AF Buys New Long Tank Thor Space 

Boosters 

AFLC Tests Early Buying of Repair Parts 
Advisory Committee To Study Maritime 

Competitive Bid Procedures 

Army To Buy New Huey Cobra Helo 

Army To Get New Portable Combat X-Ray 

Units 

Competitive Procurement of Ocean Freight" 

Service Announced 

DOD Procurement Conferences Under Way; 

Seattle Scene of Fifth Session 

DSA Advanced Procurement Planning Test 

Program Established 

Formal Advertising Results in Increased 

Procurement Competition 

FY 1966 DSA Procurement up Due to SE 

Asia Buildup 

Navy Sets Reliability Policy 

New Weather Radars Slated for SE Asia 
Procurement Conferences Set for Texas 

and Iowa 

Procurement Counseling To Be Repeated at 

Advanced Planning Briefing 

USAF Invites IE Firms To Submit Pro- 
posals for Computer Systems 

U.S. Marine Corps Advance Procurement 

Information Available 

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 

DIPEC Standards Improve Property Man- 
agement 

ICBM Reutilization Program To lfn(l~II"__ 
NORAD Excess ADp Equipment To Be 
Redistributed 



PH. Mo. 

bk Aug. 

13 Jan. 

24 Nov. 
12 May 

25 Aug. 
8 Feb. 

if Mar. 

33 Sep. 

33 Sep. 

10 Sep. 

21 Nov. 

23 Apr. 

8 Jan. 

20 Oct. 

26 Feb. 

bk Sep. 

6 May 

ib Oct. 

13 Apr, 

12 Apr. 

12 Feb. 

ib Sep. 

bk Apr. 

10 July 

21 Jan. 



20 Aug. 

4 Feb. 

bk Oct. 

12 June 

21 Apr. 

18 Juno 

25 Aug. 
32 Sep. 
bk June 
bk Jan. 

21 (Sep. 

ib May 

21 July 

21 Jan. 

if Jan, 

ib Sep. 

21 Apr. 

9 July 

21 Nov. 

26 Feb. 

31 



Title 
PUBLICATIONS 

Aeronautical Planning Seminar Proceed- 

ings Available ~- ..... _____________________ 

Booklet on 0-Ring Compounds Available _^ 
Contractors Training Guide Available ____ 

DOD Technical Term Glossary Available __ 
"Doing Business with AVCOM" Pamphlet 

Available ________________________________ 

Military Handbook on Rubber Available ___ 
MTMTS Operations Booklets Available ____ 

NASA Publishes Aerospace Dictionary ____ 

Navy Guide Available from GPO ________ 

New Directive Covers Unauthorized Dis- 

closures _________________________________ 

New Security Manual Available to Industry 
Oceanographic Study Results Published ____ 

Procurement Catalogs Available to Industry 
Radiography Handbook Available __________ 

Smithsonian Gets WWII Documents ______ 

Testing Handbooks Available to Industry __ 
USAF Report on Tactical Air Capabilities 

Available Thru DDC __________________ 

Zero Defects Handbook Published by DOD __ 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 
AF Begins Development of Automatic 

Field Telephone ________________________ 

Air Force and FAA Develop All-Weather 

Landing System for C-141 _____________ 

Air Force Tests Propulsive Wing V/STOL 

Model _________________________________ 

Air Force To Catalog Satellite Radar Por- 

traits _________________________________ 

Army Develops Light Weight Fuel Supply 

.System ___________________________ ____ 

Army To Improve Pershing Missile" System 
Atmospheric Test Chamber in .Operation 

by AF Lab ___________________________ 

High Speed Computer Print Outs Under 

Study _________________________________ 

Jet Powered Jeep Tests Device for Curing 

Dust Damage _____________________ __ 

Landing System Tested by Air Force -II__ 
Main Battle Tank Program Enters New ** 

Phase _______________________________ 

Maneuvering Unit Under" Development"! 
New Anti-Tank Weapon To Be Tested _!_! 
New Combat Communications Units To 

btreamlme Forward Air Control 
New Detection Device Aids in Search of"" 
'Vietnam Junk Fleet 

"" 



Pg. Mo. 



19 Aug. 

25 Aug. 
bk Sep. 

18 June 

if Apr. 

15 Nov. 

19 Nov. 
bk Jan. 

7 July 

16 June 
ib Sep. 
bk May 
ib Mar. 
11 Nov. 
ib Oct. 
10 May 

7 July 

ib Mar. 



New Landing Mats Tested by Military 

Al ' mo " ~ 



Tied for 



Explosive 

Tl T TV 

T- T- veatl . 



US" -UK" PM^A lur U *Y investigations 
U.Q.-U.JI . Reach Agreement on R&D of 

'Communication Satellite Project 81 

SAVINGS BONDS 
Industry Urged To Step Up Participat 

m Savings Bonds Program _ 
SECURITY 

Not 



11 Feb. 

18 June 

17 Oct. 

41 Nov. 

40 Nov. 
bk Nov. 

ib May 
19 Nov. 

if Nov. 
12 June 

22 June 
21 Oct. 
10 Nov. 

bk Aug. 
38 Oct. 

if Nov. 
19 Nov. 

35 Nov. 

82 

29 

if 

19 

bk 

24 

12 



Sep. 

Feb. 
Nov. 
Nov. 

June 
June 

Mar. 



on 



s f 



Title 

Consistency in Security Guidance Sought __ 

Control Pages of Classified Documents 

DOD_ Aims To Reduce Top Secret Inven- 
tories 

Dollars Saved Thru Reduction In Top 
Secret Documents 

GSA Authorizes Sale of Security Cabinets"" 
in Canada 

ICAF Renames Correspondence Course 
(National Security Management) 

National Security Seminars Schedule An- 
nounced , 

New Directive Covers Unauthorized bis- ~ 
closures 

New Security Manual Available To Industry 

Overclassification of Documents Expensive 

and Wasteful 

Security Classification Guidelines Pub- 
lished for DOD Construction Projects 
Security Classification, "When in Doubt/" 

Find Out" 

USAERDL Surveys Manufacturers of'" 
Physical Security Equipment 

SHIP CONSTRUCTION 

New Amphibious Assault Ship To Carry 
Helos _. 



bk Feb. t 
20 Aug. * 

30 Oct> 

bk July 

B Jan* 

Jan. 

if June 

Ifi Juno 

ib S(>|). 

bk Mar. 

2 (Apr. 

if Jan. 
if 



Study Under Way to Modernize Naval' 
Shipyards 



SMALL BUSINESS 

Small Business Firm Wins Heater Contract 

SPACE 

DOD, NASA Sign New Manned Flic-lit 

Cooperation Agreement 

NORAD Catalogues 1,000 Objects in Space 
SPECIFICATIONS 

Wire Ropn Specifications To Change _ 
TESTING 

Air Force Tests New Search and Roacuo 
Device 

Army, Air Force Test" New SurfacinFfor"^ 
lemporary Airfields and Heliports 
Tasks emccrs Givon Comont Testing 

Jct-Powcrcd Jeep Tests Device ~f or ~C\rv 

.ing Dust Damage _ 

Tank Program Enters Now 



and Flight Tested 
Landing- Mats 

Tcsts 



USN- 



TRAINING 



Available __ 

LSU i.oyei atudy Group Reviews Eximn- " 
sion of Industrial College Program 
1 acicagmg Courses Open to Defend" 
Industry j__ ^oienso 

TRANSPORTATION 

Military Kept Moving During Airlino 

Strike by MTMTS/Labor Coopl-aUon __ 
UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS 

nn Q F i 0rc - e EF n(ls 319 Unsolicited Pro- 
posals m First Half of FY 1960 

VIETNAM 
"Canine 
nam _ 



G Oct. 
if AUK. 

7 Jn?i, 



17 A]H-. 
bk Mnr. 



2G Aug. 

SO Fob. 

bk July 

11 Fob. 
if 



II 



7 Jan. 



Sop. 



18 June 

bk Scji. 

bk May 

20 Feb. 

38 Oct. 

if May 

21 Jon. 



December 




DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 



Contracts of $1,000,000 and over 
awarded during the month of Novem- 
ber 1966: 



DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENCY 

1 U.S. Rubber Co., Washington, Ind. $2,- 
617,677. 242,480 pairs of men's wet weather 
overalls. Defense Personnel Support Cen- 
ter, Philadelphia, Pn. 

J. M. Bachelmer, Frederick, Md, 31,600,- 
45V. 048,280 field pack suspenders. De- 
fense Personnel Support Center, Philadel- 
phia, Pa. 

2 Wntta Mfg, Co., Gompton, Calif, $2,620,- 
700. 5,000 largo general purpose tentn, 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia, Pa. 

Coastal States Petrochemical Co., Houston, 
Tex. $1,787,919, 10,800,000 gallons of 
JP-4 jet fuel, Defense Fuel Supply Center. 
Alexandria, Va. 

Union Oil Co. of CoHf., Los Angeles, 
Cnlif. $1,335,000. 12,000,000 snlJons of 
JP-4 Jet fuel. Defenae Fuel Supply Cen- 
ter, Alexandria, Va. 

Cities Service Oil Co., New York City. 
N.Y. $1,142,326. 10,600,000 gallons o 
JP-4 jet fuel. Defenae Fuel Supply Cen- 
ter, Alexandria. Vn. 

3 Pettlbone Mulliken Corp., Washington, 
D.C. 52,303,037. 12B six-thousand Ib ca- 
Pf|-c!ty, rough terrain fork Jlft trucks and 
129 ecta of technical manuals. Defense 
General Supply Center. Richmond, Vn. 

Major Clothing Co., Brldgeton, N.J. $2,- 
000,260. 46,000 men'a wool gabardine 
overcoats. Defense Personnel Support Cen- 
ter, Philadelphia, Pa. 

General Cnble Corp., New York City, N.Y. 
$2,055,562. 38,400 reels of field wine tele- 
phono cable, Defenae Industrial Supply 
Center, Philadelphia, Pn. 

South Wire Co., Cnrrollton, Gn. $1,688,- 
QOO. Bfl.OOO reels of field wire telephone 
Sfi 1 ! 1 , 6 ', Pf'ense Industrial Supply Center, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

4 Guy H. Jamca Industries, Midwest City, 
Okln. 51,280,000. 1,000.000 men's cotton 
sateen shirts. Ocfenac Personnel Support 
Center, Philadelphia, Po. 

Riegcl Textile Corp., Now York City, N.Y. 
$1.78,848. 1,030,000 yds of wlnd-realat- 
ant cotton oxforet cloth. Defense Person- 
nel Support Center, Philadelphia. Pa. 

~-C. M. London Co., Now York City, N.Y. 
$1,616,100. 1,300,000 ydfl of wind-resistant 
cotton oxford cloth. Defenae Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia, PH. 

10 Hart, Schoffner & Marx, Chicago, lit. 
91.600,480, 42,000 men's polyester and 
wool tropical coats, Chtcnzo. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

14 Aahby Corp., St. Louis, Mo. $4,149,000. 
300,000 folding canvas cots. Defense Gen- 
oval Supply Center, Richmond, Va. 

16 Top Co., Boston, Mass, Sl a 280,200. 770,- 
30 Iba. of wool combines. Defense Person- 
nel Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa, 

17 Collyer Insulated Wire Co., Lincoln, R.I. 
$2,300,425. 0,416,000 feet of shipboard 
cable. Defenae Industrial Supply Cantor, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

Plastald Corp., Hamburg, N.J. $8,737,658. 
18,338,000 feet of shipboard eablo. Defense 
Industrial Supply Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 
General Cable Corp., Haver town, Pa. $2,- 
178,180. 1,123,000 feet of various types of 
shipboard cable. Defense Industrial Sup- 
ply Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 



CONTRACT LEGEND 

Contract information is listed in 
the following sequence: Date 
Company Value Material or 
work to be Performed Location 
Work Performed Contracting 
Agency, 



International Nickel Co., Huntingdon, 
W. Va. 81,682,975. Various sizes of nickel 
copper alloy. Defense Industrial Supply 
Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 

18 J. P. Stevens & Co., New York City, N.Y. 
$2,863,936. 1,662,000 linear yds of cotton. 
and nylon oxford cloth. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia, Fn. 
The Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alex- 
andria, Va,, has awarded the following 
contracts for JP-5 Jet fuel: 

Humble Oil & Refining Co., Houston, 
Tex. $6,872,040. 75,600,000 gals. 
Mobil Oil Corp., New York City, N.Y. 
86,221,356. 56,084,120 gala. 
Gulf Oil Corp., New York CEty, N.Y. 
S8,07&,300. 42,000,000. 
Sun Oil Corp., Philadelphia, Pa. $.2,41)5,- 
606. 26,200,000 gals. 

Edging ton Oil Refineries, Long Beach, 
Calif. S1,69G,126. 13,750,000 eats. 
Golden Eagle Refining Co., Loa Anffales, 
Calif. $1,500,600, 13,000,000 gale. 
Marathon Oil Co., New York City, N.Y. 
$1,404,330, 15,960,000 gala. 
Union OH Co. of Calif., Loa Angeles, 
Calff. 31,261,209. 11,424,000 gala. 
21 Sport welt Shoe Co., Nashua, N.H. $1,466,- 
3&0. 110,388 pairs of combat boots. Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alexandria, 
Vn., has awarded the following contracts 
for petroleum products: 

Texaco Export, Inc., New York City, 
N.Y. $3,733,600. 1,900,000 barrels of 
Navy Spec in 1. 

Atlantic Richfield Co., Los Angeles, 
Calif. $2,310,600, 000,000 barrels at 
Navy Special. 

Texaco, Inc., New York City, N.Y. ?!,- 
280,100, 610.000 barrels of Navy Special. 
Standard: Oil Co. of California, San 
Franclaco, Calif. 51.24ft.400, 110,000 
barrels of Combat Type II and 7G.OOO 
barrels of Combat Type I (gasoline). 
Edging ton OH Refineries, Inc., Long 
Beach, Calif. $1,800,600. 46,000 barrels- 
of Navy Special. 

Texas City Refining Co., Texas City, Tex. 
$1,127,500. 300,000 barrels of Diesel 
Marine. 

Golden Eagle Refining Co., Los Angeles, 
Calif. $1,097,800. 410,000 barrels of 
Navy Special. 

Union Oil Co. of California, Loa Angeles, 
Cnlif. 51,184,000. 140,000 barrels of 
Arctic dicacl fuel oil nnd 130,000 barrala 
of arnde DF-1 dEesol fuel oil. 
American OH Co., Chicago, III. $2,101,- 
680. Fuel oil and gasoline. 
Gulf Oil Corp,, Houston, Tex. 51,567,- 
B73. Fuel oil and gasoline, 
Mobil Oil Corp., New York City, N.Y. 
$1,107,002. Fuel oil and gasoline. 
22 The Defense Personnel Support Center, 
Philadelphia, Pa,, haa awarded the follow- 
ing contraota for men's black oxford dress 
shoes r 

Genesco, Inc., Nashville, Term. 82,810,280. 
800,000 pairs. 

Cumberland Shoo Corp., Franklin, Tenn. 
31,929,600. 210,000 pairs. 
Endicotl-Johnaon Co., Endicott, N.Y. S2,- 
888,080. 280,000 pairs. 
J. F. McBlwnln Co., Nashua, N.H. $2,- 
277,000. 300,000 pairs. 
International Shoe Co., St. Louis, Mo. 
Sl,36a.a81. 148,04-4 pairs-. 
Milcom products, Inc., Rocheator, N.Y. 51,- 
064,023. 602,432 men's belta. Defense Per- 
sonnel Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 
Wales Mfg. Co., Boaton. Maaa. $1,067,600. 
25,000 men's wool gabardine overcoats. 
Defense Personnel Support Center, Phila- 
delphia, Pa, 

29 Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, N.J. 
$1,007.368. 1.7&9,7flB package* of aurgkal 
ftpongea. Defense Personnel Support Cen- 
ter, Philadelphia, Pa. 

26 The Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alex- 
andria, Va., has awarded the following 
contracts for JP-4 3et fuel ! 

Debco Corp., Abilene, Tex. $6,182,828. 

60,862,200 gallons. 

Bell Oil & Gas Co.. Bartleavllle, Okla. 

$8,827.787. 87,666,000 ttallona. 



Sioux Oil Co., Newcastle, Wyo, 
100. 20,000,000 gallons. 
Delta Refining Co., Memphis, Tenn. S2,- 
2-17,920. 21,652,000 gallons. 
Howell Refining Co., San Antonio, Tex. 
$1,547,218. 14,815,000 gallons. 
Tcsoro Petroleum Corp,, San Antonio, 
Tox. 81,881,038. 16,800,009 gallons. 
Cryatal Plaali Petroleum Co., Indianap- 
olis, Ind. 51,483,523. 18,670,000 gallons. 
Permian Corp., Houston, Tex. $1,408,- 
370. 13,800,000 gallons. 
Northwestern Refining Co., St. Paul 
Park. Minn. 81.156,168. 11,326,600 gal- 
lons. 

Southland! Oil Co., Yasao City, Mass. 
31,114,321. 10,130,000 gallons. 
Delta Refining Co., Memphln, Tenn. SI,- 
04G,12fl. 10,328,000 gallona. 
Howell Refining Co., San Antonio, Tex. 
1,038,253. 10,186,000 gallons. 
Benton Dairy, Pcnsacola, Fin. $1,088,169. 
Three-month supply of milk and milk 
products for Fort Denning, Qa. Defensa 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

28 Standard Oil Co, of California, Ban Fran- 
cisco, Calif. 1,174,229. 8,079,060 gallons 
of RP-1 rocket fuel. Defense Fuel Supply 
Center, Alexandria, Va. 

Morris Fiahmnn & Sona, Inc., Philadelphia. 
Pa. $1,561,07!). 1,373,908 pounds of scoured 
carbonized wool, Defense Personnel Sup. 
port Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 
J. Sclioencmnn, Inc., O wings MilJs, Md, 
$1,021,600. 80,000 men's tropical wool- 
polyester coats. Defenae Peraonnel Sup- 
port Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 
39 Rolane Sportswear, New York City, N.Y. 
Si, 100, 900, 114,300 rnincoata, Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

Southern Athletic Co., KnoxvlHe, Tonn. 
$1,826,000. 220,000 rntncoata, Defense 
Personnel Support Center, Philadelphia, 
Pa. 

Tfllllco Mfg. Co., Telllco Plains, Tenn. !,- 
073,071. 141,700 raincoats. Defense Per- 
sonnel Support Center, Philadelphia. Pn, 
Hunter Outdoor Products, Long Island 
City, N.Y. S2,G44,QOO. 9,800 medium atee 
general purpose tents. Defense Personnel 
Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa, 
Winfield Mfjr. Co., Winfleld, Ala. ?4,B28, 
527. 847,110 pairs of men's cotton, wind- 
resistant poplin trousers. Defenao Person- 
nel Support Center. Philadelphia, Pa. 
Dr-ownwood Mfg. Co., Dallas-, Tex. $1,602,- 
500. 260,000 pairs of men's cotton wind- 
resistant poplin trouaera r Defense, Person- 
nel Support Center, Philadelphia, Pa. 

ARMY 

1 General Instrument Corp., S. W. Sickles 
DJv., Chlcopee, Mass, $1,506,760. 760-lb 
bomb fuzes. Chlconee. Ammunition Pro- 
curement & Supply Agency, Jollet, 111. 

Caterpillar Tractor Co,, Pemia, 111. ?2,- 
313,034. Industrial tractors. Peoria. Army 
Tank Automotive Cantor, Warren, Mich. 

PMC Corp., San Jose, Calif. $2,573,814. 
Self ^propelled Hawk guided missile equip- 
ment carriers, San Joso. Army Tank 
Automotive Center, Warren, Mich. 
8 Bell Helicopter Co., Fort Worth, Tex, (1,- 
241,000. UH-1 aircraft scissor and sleeve 
assemblies. Fort Worth. Aviation Materiel 
Command, St. Louts, Mo. 

Hughe* Tool Co., Culver City, Onllf, fl,- 
420,000. TH-66A helicopters. Culver Oity, 
Army Aviation Materiel Command, St* 
Louis, Mo. 

Chamberlain Corp., Waterloo, IOWB, (1,- 
178,835. 2.76-inch rocket ammunition metal 
parts. Waterloo. Ammunition Procure- 
ment & Supply Agency, Jollet, 111. 

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., New 
Orleans, La. $1,803,807. Flood control 
work on the Mississippi River and Its 
tributaries (Laulalana Project), St, 
Marttn'8 Pariah, La. Engineer Dlst,, New 
Orleans, La. 

4 Plillco Corp., Palo Alto, Calif. 91,000,000, 
Classified research and development* Falo 
Alto. Army Electronics Command, Fort 
Monmouth, N.J, 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



33 



TUW, Inc., Rcdondo Beach. Oallf. $1,BOO,- 
000. Classified electron fi'ii equipment, 
Iledondo Deach, Army Klrelrojilim (Join- 
maud. Fort Monmoiilli, N.J. 
AVCO Corp., Stratford, Cunn. $1,1173,011, 
Increased facilities to iiurmil iidiNlltmal 
production of T-63 cushion jind I1H-1 air- 
craft npnro and repair iiurts. .Stratford. 
Army Aviation Materiel Commrnul, HI. 
Louis, Mo. 

General Electric, I!iirllnnton, Vt, $1,1(31,, 
02$. Armament pod tiparo nnrdi nnd jfroimil 
equipment. Burlington. Army Wrainmii 
Command, Hook Island Amelia!, III. 
7 General Electric, Mlnnlla & Hnnre Dlv.. 
I'hlhidclplila, Pa. $1,273,000. Addldimrii 
effort on the AlU'A Prujwil CI.DW r- 
search program (an optitml Iniilniiiu'iila- 
tlon system). White Handn Mliinllo Itinmir, 
N.M. and Kwnjnluln Tent Hl(<!. Army 
MlBBilc Command, Hnnliivfllo, Atn. 
Pace Corp., Memphis, Tenn. SH.llfiH.JHfi. II- 
iiunlnatliiB ground iilitiialii. Monipliln. Am- 
nuiiiltlon Procurement & Huiiply Auuni'v 
Jollol, 111, 

~~"K, n . lac ^ Jot! l | ^"ni. t Toledii, Ohio. 
284. MOOQ '/.-ton iitlllly Inioliu. 
Army Tank Automotive tJonlo 
Mich, 

Phllco Corp., C'oninuuiicnllon ft KIcTlnmlm 
ulv., Phlladeljihia. Pa. $l,lBa.!!fi4, Kx- 
pannlon of the IntcBraled Wldn Itnnil Ct.ni- 
munlcatlon Syutcm tralnlnif fiidlld.'u ni 
l;ort Monmoulh, N.J. Army 1-ilcnd'iml 
K? mmiin , cl ' l mt Mniimoiitli, N.J. 

rinirhu'cr. Inc., 
,OB!t. Hitrvircn for 

.~ r '\~i" A'""-iT Wliln Hand (iniii- 
munlcatlon Hyi.lom) fac|]IUi:ii at Fort Mi.n- 



*i!,flll,- 

'I'.ilnl... 

Wnrron, 



sr. Glbaon & (JrcBK, (nc., I,milmrir 
Pin W 1 01,047. Work *' Urn .,''"& 

oK Vi! 1 P f? Jc ? t ' 1 ' l . l , t , rl " m '""I Mnrl.,i. 
Countlca, ].'l n . Engineer Dint., Jnok ..... ivlllv, 

Cor11 " Mwmil!ii. Win. 
;, nos. Mllwmikuu. Army 

tiiulpmont Uommnnd, HI. I.onli,, 

RCA, Durllnfflon, Mnnn, $11,704,777. Mulillii 
l1 ' vaHlllln " |I ' |)I " 



mnm H, ,,'!,' 1 , 1 n 

mantl, luiiituvllla, Aln, 

Corp., Mnrir.ii, Vn. 



10- 



. Army lOl 






, Mh 



onrblno parts. 
tnchmont, 



n 

oily N Y 






34 



B, 111. 



- -Nurrla Tlirrmmlnr Corii.. T,i- 3 Anurlr* 

Cnllf, (I.SIlll.llMt, l!i-hi.1-Mli n il,,, ( , nf ; 

anil Iniiliilliidni) pi IM!H,' Hoi < inlin^mi (, 
linllliilli'l'. Jlli'rl'I'Hlili, I 'ullf . A lillmmll l.n 
I't'iiiiiii'i'iiU'iil .1 ;iii|'i'ii' A i, 1 1 in-!, .!,ih,-i [)| 

Aliirini Ciirii,, Wiml'.-.ilin. \Vh. $ .',1 Ki'mni 
lllliiini pM'jivdli-i. \ViiiiL. i\\n I t'fn,i,V,.i ,i 

Allll'lllll, I'll. 

- -Unltrd Aln rnfl, lllhitrabr A in in ft iMi, 

IIKM nunrinlillr i f,,, TM '11 till . i,i[( Hh n! 
furd. Ai'iny Avludi.n .'-Ulrrtfl '..;, .l,,*--A 
Hi. f,i.iiln, M,i. 

Ill- Mulnnvli Ituhlifr I'K,. A):(,ni. nhi,, pi , ( /\ , 
'I'M. I'iK'iiiiinltn Mn i f.'i I 's ;. n n.nll, ,' 3 
nrtd Ji'i.dm iMtflin AM.'i>, Am,j- 'ins.h 
Alilnnindvii rmirr. \Vftiifti, M(. d 
Mnlinilrlil 'I'lfd A ttildltei lit, MnnnfUM 

lull linlli-ln Illnl -'i !!, (nniia Mnsi iflcj!*! 

Army '1'niili AuiKiiiu'. UP i Vf.it i v, n . , ,-.. 
Mlrli, 
lluiitr, AHuri Ai'fitlut Itnt,m,[i, |, u 

ti'fhtilntl t-lft.rl In f.'-H'i' .n ,.( !(:.-. At!,-* 
C'nmtinl ll.;l'i'|.i|p|iii-u! In-.) linj ,-, , f r, ... j ,',_, ' j 

Ai'inyn innl ;iii]i)n>] \ \'\,\i\,^. t <;. ,!!.,',,'-,. 

I'l'iii'lHi'llH'Mf Alii'll- i. ' (i!. (Ji,.> Itl 

1'iirlllr I'nr A I niilnlu 1'n.. ||. : ,,i. !( , v'. 0=1(5 



. . 

fV, Unliltinil, I'ntU, 

HUld ('milt nr|<ir, |,u- . Mi- 



, 
I'l'H,. Tuhn. Mliln 

1'nllril Alr.rnd, t'o^i lln 
lI'tMNK. J| II, 1,,\ IA 
MA )l,.||r,i,,l,-,> 1 , 

Avliiil.ni Mtut-tinl r, : ; ,. 



, , ~ , . 

4/n MI,,.,.,.,,,. .,,,., '.C (1 ;; 

Hnltirltl l'i>niiitnn.|. M 1 .,. ,-, , 
ClinmtiFtlnln r.n|i.. VmUj!..,' J. ,, 



n - r .r-' (...,.tu, |,iv *.(., -.,,,, 

vi*.w. miir, n.iu.,1..-.* (j.,0,',^ /,",,:' 

yi'l"]'(ii,-in ni iti rirji , f ,>, ,...,. ,,.,: 

'lire., .M.-imlnl,, Vln,, AKii, * ',-",, *,, 

' 




1. *' *, 

llti lira f,, r i II i- i ,, 

. T flft I. 7., -)'; '! 

. A, . 

* ''" 



. 






...,,,,,,,^ K 

t'li llfd" .('{inl Cam w 

i.ao.oo n , ; , f ti ;,J r' 1 -'' '"!" 
" " 



.'.![.; 1)1 

!V;" iF .r,!!(, fc 

'>" ^'-., i-,. 

-/ J-!!'i. JH 



... tun 



"" 



n '^i. Cullf. (fl/m, 
'f-Utc).i.i.rfl,J 
' r| i* l*hFJcifhi, 'Ytit 



.4, , wit,,,),.,,!..,, 1M, ||I.W,. 

l*- C !l fl hl l. f J,7l||lr|, hWklti 

'-'" , ltn " A''i';'-ilili. I'r.n-iireimiK 

- 



-'>*. Nr Army Kleriruntci 
, l-Mr^tcit.iir*. I-,,, 



I J -U-c-'ll, Jr!l=l, 11), 

rtnj TH*..*. lnf (i^ffjii ,, 

*..>*(' -^ftlttr** f,tr ttt.iftit 

fV.'-.",.;^!..!', Ci,^,, r(!1 , lc ,.,l 

> i. Jl- !,-ii, II! 

Ml M(,.Udl '.. Alt'bK. N.J. 13,10,. 
*<t rnB ..'Bi!| V f ( 
rV;U A(,!,iif.Lii"ti J'fi* 

t/i A**...)., j 1 ,.:!.!. ni, 



. 



. Sttlli 
Hup- 



, 

1 



, 
I* t *(*..; A'ttiniilil^.i t't^unmtni A Sutw 

AKft^f, ^ t .)[*l. III, 



., 

M-II. ajifindfio!,!, ArmyT*nk 

('!*t4t#f, WliirtrH, Wlfh, 
* ft ('., (I'lfH Worth. T. 
m* )Mfi MMUItt for UK'l 
l-Vri Wtbrtb, Army Avltilon 

Hi, l-ivilll, Mo. 

it t ir!fni(loa. N.G, I!,- 
/r Hlk* Itmulw 
Armr Mloll* Cera- 
All. 



Contractor & Hulldcrs, Ml. Cnrmel, 
III. nut] I). M. Illnlie Construction Co., 
Sholhyville, 111. 51,167.405. Work on the 



I-IJJ. 9^,.lUf,'fuift IT VI It. III! L1LU 
Local Flood 1'rotection Project. 
Mt. Cni-mel, Engineer UlHt., Loulnville, Ky. 
-Scrvel Co., Froenort, III. $1,705,450. Dry 
butter lea for portable iminpiitttcci] radio nets. 
L 1 '] 1 ueport. Army Electronic!) Command, 
Philadelphia, Pa. 

Chrysler Corp., Detroit, Mich. $8,736,121. 
Engine oHHemblica with oontiiiners for %- 
ton t-i(ol(n. Mtu-yuville, Mich. Army Tank 
Automotive Center, Warren, Mich, 
Hell Aerospace Corp., l''ort Worth, Tex. 
(1) S,GOll,2(ilj. Mnln rotor huh nsHumblics 
for UII-l helicopters, (2) ?B,137,2CG, Rotor 
blaileH, drive mcchnninm nnd components 
for AII-1G helicopters. (3) $l,301>,f)GO, 
CIKIC BBHcmLHcs, lever ntuicinblleEi, shaft ns- 
ucmibHca niul lire wall iisiiemblieH for Hie 
1IH--I Micopter. 521.7115,000. Cobra AII- 
H. ho lc<njtcra. (fi) $l,8Gfi,577. Hotor bladea 
for the IJH-i helicopter. Fort Worth. 
Army Avlntion Miiterk'l Command, 3t. 
Iionls, Mo. 

tinr-Lct Mfs. Co,, I'hitndclpliiii, Pn. 51,. 
1119, 464. Criblc aaaemhllcH for Held tele- 
phoned, Old Force, Pn. Army Electronic!! 
('(imniiinclj Philndelphla, 1'a. 
--J-lci-troBimec Corii., (!len Cove, N.Y. $1.- 
jtM./ilU. Central iifllca telcplionc-H, mniuin). 
Nn iri in bo, Puerto Hlco. Army Electronics 
Philadelphia, Pa. 




Ammiiy. JiiUi't, 111. 

-liny & Zimmerman, Inn., Philadelphia, Pa. 
St!S,20iS,4GIi. Artillery projcistlleti. fuv.eu and 
rt'lnieil <coi]icmen(H and O&MA activities. 
1 wxarhniin, Tex. AmnninHlttn Procurement 
& Hii[i]ily AKoney, Juliet, 111. 

Allan Chemical Industries, Wilmington, 
IM. ?1M<M,8<). TNT. Clmttanoogft, Toiin. 
Ammunition Procurement & Simply 
AKimtsy,, Joliot, 111. 

--Mn.Hiin & Hunger, 8\\nn Mason Co.. Now 
York O !ty. N. Y. $ 1 1 .083,202. Wnrhcads 
mid rein tail nmmuiilllnn components mid 
O&MA nativities. Hurlliuilon, Iowa, Am- 
munition Procurement & Supply Agency, 
JoHtil, III, 

--Hercules, Inc., WllmhiKlon, Del. $11,220.057. 
MJiinollnnuuii!] propellnnlH nllil explosives 
(Nike liofiHloi'). Hartford, Vn. Ammunition 
I'riiRiiromont ft Hupply Agency, Joliot, 111. 

Ilnhin & HIIKK Co., Phlliidelpbln, Pa. $t,- 
15(1,0(10. Pro] mMon rcuetu'ch. Ilnnlavlllo, 
Aln. Army MiiitiiUi Command, llimlavllle, 
A In. 

Honeywell, Inc., Jloiikltiti, Minn. Sl,r.ar>,H1B. 

l''nciHtl(jFi Id fiiliihlliili i>litcUini capnliili- 
Ui!ii fur fiiat'tt for llio H)mm cartridtto. Now 
lii'litliloii, Minn. Am 1111111 11 Inn I'rocuroinoiit 
& Hnpj>ly AKny, Jollot, 111. 

--Clinmli-crlnln Cor|i., Wiilurloo, Iowa. $2,- 
(1HV.40&, IIEK'i ex|)l(>alvi> warhonila Tor tlio 
2.7B-inch roRlcut, metal inirln. Wntiirloo, 
IOWB, AniniiinlLioii Prminromont & Hunjily 
AKcncy, Jdliut, 111, 

"-(tilibn MTg. & Iteacnrcli Corp., Jtin onvllb, 
Win. $1,3H1,3HI). FUKWI for llio 2.75-liicb 
r (ic Suit, nintn] jmrlH. Juiititvlllu. Aiiiniuul- 
tliin Procurement & Hui|i]y Anoncy, Jollet, 

--I.cLlBh, Inc., Knnton, 1'n. $l,l)OG.7US*. HlKh 
exploBlva wurlicnds for llin B.76-luch i-ocltot, 
molal imrlft, EaHlon. Ammunition Pro- 
curement & tinpiily A^oticy, Joliot, 111. 

Ciciiorfit Motors, Andernon. Ind, $U,4 00,0 00. 
HlitUtrlca, ia-volt, typo 2IIM for ',4-ton and 
14-toii ti'itakH, Annlioim, Cnlif. Army Tank 
Automotive C ciilcr, Wnrron, Mich. 

- (Jcnernl Motors, Detroit, Mich. $1,852,002. 
GVG3 illcHel enainou with contnlncr, cylin- 
der, V tyye, H10 HP, In muiport of M118A1 
volilcloa fninily. Detroit. Army Tank Auto- 
motive Cotiler, Wnrrcn, Mich. 

Weiicrnl Motors, Iludson, Ohio. 52,508,000. 
Trucku. Euelid, Ohio. Army Mobility Euul|i- 
nujnt Command, St. Loulii, Mo. 

Projfrcaalve Construction Co., Fnrnivillo, 
Vn. 1,007.233. Maintenance) and rchnhlll- 
Inlion of Army Trnliiiim Center and nt!H- 
llos. l*'ort l.lragg, N.C. Knglnoer Diet., 
iSavnnnnli, On, 

McDonnell Aircraft, St. Louis, Mo. $3,000,- 
000. Contlnuod otiKhujcrlng dovolui>inant 
for the medium antl-tnnk nasault wcapono 
]MAW). Titusvllle, Fla. Army Miasllo 
Oommnnd, liitntavillo, Ala. 

Jloclnn Co., Morton, PB. $2,136,040. Rotor 
wing bl rules for CII-47 nivcrnft. Morton, 
Army AvlttUon Mtitci-Iol Commnnd, St. 
Lou la, Mo, 



Minnesota Mining & Mfff. Co., Iloaheater, 
Minn. $2,340,121. Periscopes and tnnk peri- 
scope mounts for use with the armored 
reconnaissance airborne nssnult vehicle 
(General IleHdnn), Rochester. Krankford 
Arsenal, Philadelphia, Pn. 
Canadian Commercial Corp., Ottawa, Cnn- 
adn. $4,000,000, Radio seta nnd nncillnry 
items, Montreal, Quebec, Cnnndn. Army 
LlectronicH Command, Fort Monmonth, 
N.J. 

J l , n * tlle , on Co - Norwood, MBBH. $2,000,000. 
Multiplexor nnd ancillary items. Norwood 
Man/i. Army Electronics Commnnd, Fort 
Monmouth, N.J. 

General Dynamics, RocheHtor, N.Y. $1,823,- 
100. Components of siieltcrlssert radio acts 
mounted on n truck. ItochcBter, Army 
I'jlectrnmicfi Commnnd, Philnclcliihln, Pn, 

Maelilett Laboratories, Spi-ingclnlc, Conn. 
$10,000,000. A cliiNHined quantity of image 
inlensHier auncmbly. SpriiiRdnlo. Army 
Llflctronleu Command, Fort Momnouth, 
N.J. 

Harvey Alnmlntirn, Inc., Torrnncc, Calif. 
$4, HBO, 800. 20mm high explosive incendi- 
ary projectile metal parts and iiiiucial tool- 
iiiK. Torrancc. Frank ford Amenal, Philn- 
delphia, Pa. 

NAVY 

1 LTV AcrOfl|inco Corp., LTV Vouglit Aero- 
nniillcH Dlv., Dalian, Tex. $2,-0()G,(JOQ. Serv- 
ices anil material to extent! the service life 
and incorpimiUi Improvement changes on 
F-HI) aircraft, Dallas. Navnl Air SyHtemn 
Command. 

Mtiturola, Inc., Scoltmlnle, AT la. ?1,SSC,780, 
Development of a tnrisel detcntlnit device 
for tlio fuuing syBlcni of tninHllc. Scottu- 
ilitle. Nnvy Ptirchantng Onice, LOM Angclca, 
Calif. 

aWllllnmctto Iron & Steel Co,, Porthind, 
Ore. $l,G87,7Bl. Itounlar ovorhaul of the 
landiiui Bhlji, dock, UBS Fort Marion (LSD- 
22). Porthind. Inilimtrinl Manager, Tliir- 
teen th Navnl District. 

Sniulcra Amioclntes, Inc., Nnshun, N.II. 
51,000,000. Continued dovelopmutit of an 
nlr droppnblo ASW soimhuoy system. 
Nanlmn. Nnval Air HyHteniH Command, 

--IICA, David Siirnoff Hcwonrcli, Center, Aiitro 
Dlv., Princeton, N.J. $2,1)00,000. KIx Navy 
navigalinn satelliteH. Princeton, Special 
I'rojoetii Ottlco. 

--LFB Electronics, Huston. Mami. Jl,6-10,030. 
I'll ec ironic altimeters, DOB ton, Navnl Air 
Syloinn Command. 

Loeklieud MlBllcH & Spnco Co., Sunnyvale, 
Cnlif. SO.OG-MOO. CJInHiiined nervlcea. Sunny- 
vale. Speclnl Projects OHlce. 

Lnekliced MIsnllcH & Space Co., Sunnyvale, 
Cnlif. $fl,Of(4,13H. Hupport of tlio Polnrin 
mlfl&llc iH'ORrnm. Sunnyvale. Special Pwjj. 
cntH Onico. 

JiNortli American Aviation, CohimhuH, Olilo. 
81,706,000. liiiitnllmenL fmidinK for th 
Condor misHlle. Columbus. Nnval Air Syn- 
tonm Commnnil. 

North Amorlrnii Aviation, CohunbuH, Ohio. 
?8,B80,903. T-BH aircraft nnd related 
Gtniiptncnt. Cnliimliiis. Naval Air Systems 
Command, 

4 Lonkurt IClcetrlc Co., Han Cnrlon, Calif. 
51,050,488, Electronic equipment. Ran Cnr- 
lon. Navy PurchimiuB Olllco, WaHliliiBton, 

n. a 

Ren Construction Co., Chnrlnlto, N.C. 3-i,- 

202,000. Modorni/ation of Drydaek No.. 
2 at the Nnval Shipyard, Charleston, S.G. 
HoutliouHl Ulv., Nnval Facilities EnBlneor- 
hij[ Command. 

7KnlwlBtlo MfK. Corp., Cranston, It. I. J10,- 
aiiH.RtlO. Ciitaiiullii and launch spares for 
launching nlrcraft. Cranfiton. Nnval Air 
EuKfncerinB Center, Philadelphia, Pn. 

R General Electric, Philadelphia, Pa. $2,2DO.- 
000. Gatiipult eiiffino power iilant nflsem- 
hllcH nnd iiparo imrls kits, for InunchliiK 
aircraft. Cincinnati, Ohio. Naval Air En- 
BlnocrinB Center, Philadeli)hin, Pa, 
American Electronic Laliorntorlca, Colmnr, 
Pa, $1,1)0-1,076, Development of an nlrboniG 
UIIF radio receiver-transmitter pod, Col- 
mnr. Nnvnl Air Systems Commnnd. 

B~l)cthlclioin Steel Corp., Terminal Island, 
Calif, 51,780,018. Topslda overhaul of the 
oiler USS Chamung (AO-30). Terminal 
lalnnd. Industrial Manager, llth Naval 
Dlst. 

10 United Aircrnft, Enst Ilnrtford, Conn. $lt>.- 
004,630. TF83-P-7 cnfiinpa for the Air 
Force, Enat Hartfonl. Naval Air Syatemn 
Command. 

McDonnell Aircrnft, St. Louis, Mo. SV 
273,400, Spare pnrta in sup port of landing 
Bear components for F4J nircraft, St. 
Louis. Naval Aviation Supply Office, Phila- 
delphia, Pa, 



Allen M. Cnrnplicll Co., Tyler, Tex. $5,- 
31)8,000. Construction of n Force Troop H 
Complex, at the Marine Corps Hiiac, Crimp 
Lejeune, N.C. Atlantic, Div., Nnval Facili- 
ties Enniiieerini? Command, 
Sen I rain Linen, Kdftcwntcr, N.J. 3100,- 
000,000. Uao uf la Hhips in the movement 
of military cargoes. Military Sen Transpor- 
tation Service. 

M Hnrvcll Kilicorc Corp., Tooiie, Tcnn, $0, 
HG6.208. JV1K2-1, MOD 8 aircraft imrnchute 
(InrcH. Toonu. NJivy Shlpn J'tirta Control 
Center, MechnnlcshiirR:, Pa, 
Nortliroii Corp., Aalujvillc, N.O. $14,106,- 
GOO. MK34, MOD 3 nlrcrnft pnrncluite 
Ilarcii. Attheville, Nnvy Shipy Parta Control 
Center, Meclmnicalnirir, Pm. 

IB Sylvnnia Elcclrnnlcs Syntems, Wnlthnm, 
Mjisa. 1,029,750. Airborne receiver trnim- 
mittcr radio suls and rctlntotl omilpment. 
Walthism. Nnval Air Systoma Cinnmand. 
McDonnell Aircrnft Corp., St. Louis, Mo. 
SJMOO.OOO. I' 1 - IK nnd KF-10 alrcrnft for 
the Air Force.. St, Louis. Nnval Air Systems 
Cnmninnd. 

- Plnnlnld Corp,, IlninmirK. N.J. S3,37T,3S9. 
ShieldcsiS vlcctrlcnl cubic; for aiiljilionrd itiae, 
I Inmli itr[[. Nfivy KlectrnnlcH Supply Ofllce, 
Grcnt Laltos, III. 

l(t Uetlilchcni Steel Corp., Bethlehem, Pa. ?!,- 
400.021. MK42 nun barrel liners nnil tubca. 
Iletlilchom. Nnval Ordnance 1'lnnt, Loiile- 
vilk, Ky. 

Teledyno, Inc., Scwnrt Sencrnft I)lv., Ber- 
wick, I,n. Sl.lDiljSO*. Construclioii of (Ivo 
Bn-fnot pntrol bontH. ?S,127,a07, Constnic- 
linn of 13 fili-fnriL bontH Cut 1 vnrlomi purposcfl. 
Herwtch, Nnval Ship SywlnmH Cumniand. 
CflllliiH itndlo Co., Cedar Knuiids, lown. 
S3.IIOU.7JIB. Airborne communication, ntrvl- 
Hfition, tduntlftaattun Hyutema nnd compo- 
nents. Cednr llnpidn. Nnval Air Syatoina 
Command. 

ITT I-'cdcrnl LaborntoricB, Kulley, N.J. |1,- 
Tfli),050. Airborne receiver-transmitters. 
Nntley. Nnval Air Syatcms Command, 
Spnrt*n Corp., Jnckson, Mich. f8,Q87,12a, 
Production of HiincilHiuyH. Jnclcuon. Nnval 
Air Synlc'!iin Ccmiinitnd. 

Pennsylvania Sttitc Univcriiity, Ordnnnco 
Itcncnrch Lnljoralory, UttJvcrnlty Park, Pn. 
!7,GSO,000. Worlt on MIB torpcdocn. IJnt- 
vurnity Pnrl(, Nnval Onlnnnca Syfltcine 
Commnnd. 

Jolms Hopkins University, Applied PhyatcA 
Lnlioratory, Silver Spring, Md. 52,flaa,3^B, 
To increrific llio HCOIIG of tlio contract for 
llic Jiiiniblebee wi>a]ion nyiilom nnd naaoci- 
iitcd orilnniice liishs. Silver Sprlns. Nnval 
Ordnnnee Syalcinfl Command. 
17 Guilder so H Itrolhorn EnfflneorJiiff Corp., 
Portland, Oris. SH.SG'l.'lBO. Cotiatruotian of 
InndiiiK crnft. Portland. Nnvnl Slilp Sys- 
leiriH Geimmftud. 

BetHlIx Corp., Tcterhoro, N,J. 54,821,000. 
Compononln of the AN-ASN-8U 1 nnvlgn- 
Uona] cnniimter not for F-4J nlrcraft. 
Tcterhoro. Nnvnl Avlnllon Supply Ofllce, 
PhKnilelphln, Pn. 

Mnrliiolte Mnrine Corp., MnriiwttCj Wla, 
S.1,E40,00, Construction of landing craft. 
Mnriniitte, Naval Slilp SyBtonm Commniul, 
flcncral Precisian, Inc., Gliflon, N.J. Jl,- 
(HH.DJtfi. Airborne navlnntloniil computer 
iictu. CJICton. Nnvnl Air SyBtfiiriH Commnnd, 
MEiffttnvox Co., Fort Wayne, Ind. $2,108,B17. 
Modlflcallon hltn for nJrborno radnr aotfl, 
Fort Wnyno. Navfll Atr Syntemn Oommnnd, 
Siinilutrand Corji., Itockforcl, III. J2,G72,B46, 
Constant upeed drlvc-a nnd fren.uoncy con- 
trol hoxcH. Hockfonl. Navnl Air Systema 
Commnnd. 

LTV Aerospace Cam., Dnllna, Tex. 38^,- 
000,000. A-7I1 nircraft. Dnllna. Nnval Air 
Systems Cummniul. 

18 Curtiss Wright Corp., Wood-Ill duo, N.J. 
51,176.302.. K33GO on ulna components for 
A 1 15 and Am nlrcraft. Wood-ltldpfe. Navnl 
Aviation Supply OHlce, Phlladelnliln, Pn, 

31Lear Slcglcr, Inc., Grnnil Hnplda. Mich. $&,- 
BBS, IBS. Loft bomb compiilcr nyatems. 
Ciraml Rni>l(E&. Nnval Air SyatomH Com- 
mnnd. 

Cftlllnn Rndlo Co., Cedar Rnpldo, Iowa, 
SG,C93,0(18. Airbornn VIIV radio Boto. Oadnr 
HnpldB. Nnval Air SyHteniB Commnnd. 

United Aircrnft, East Hartford, Conn, $8,- 
OC7,BG2. J-ftd-F-a eiiKlneB for tho Nnvy. 
East Hnrtfortl. Nnval Air SyBteino Com- 
mand, 

OcnBO Industries, Port Huoncmo, Cnlif. 

SC,172,7BS. Deaiirn mid dciilRn documenta- 
tion on experimental, developmental nnd 
prototype military ordnance cQulpmont. 
Iltddcnrcst, Calif. Navy Purchnalnar Odlco, 
Loa Angolea, Calif. 



Defense Industry Bulletin 



ir I'lifJiUntr nl Kn-nl,.,- A HI ML,, "r',',7, 
I'lv. Naval Kai'llill-':. Kniiim'i'. (,; ' (',',' 

Ti.'lt.ri!!,!-,?*' 1 "^ 1 ! """ l "" A " "''i.-i-nVl, 

I'l'iif. NI.VUI Aviiitii.H .'iiu'piv'oiii^, Viln".- 

'ii'liililn I'd. 
-riiilro-Konl C(.r[i,, |',,,t IVii-ilifiHidm )' 



AIR FORCE 



nM Alrrrnri KM,,!,.^.!,.,, d,,,,., 

ij.', I,.],, NiVi ]:, .| ,it A , ,' 

' 




ii^^^ 



. 

Mi1' t.-ulil Dalrk,. || ...... ,, 

t .M;".V i.. Mfii, w , t ,i.hi,v , , : "f/; ' , 

"I'l-lv Irnr.T. IVnrl lU.t!.,,. i| BS . n V, n * 11 ' 
lnUrumil.iPMlnl Mf. I',, ii n ,i (l , h i r 

I ' 



,,. , 

Nnvnl Air Hv.,1..,,,, r,,,,,,,,, ,.| 

' 





iiitit. \li.mh. , 

U"" ..... : I ). , (-' 



''"'-" ' -'.IMi" 1 !! 1 !.-, ." !I ! ' U ''' '" 
'">'i n | ML,,,!,. V,, ; -, ( ,, ,, 

ni'> -'I'vir;',:;:/'^,;' ;;v'- 
^''-''"^'^M- 1 , 1 .' Ai'i, : ,./!" i 

IMlt-r^i... r., . cj... . . ., ,. 

* 



MARINE CORPS 

Ii|!i??Ii|g 



t'u, 






IJ . ' "t i IlilM Plf 

"' '"I' nt.,1 ,!,.,,,;,;,!' """". JB,( 
t'i!'.",'!?.',!'' ""'' *'""'''( "m" ! lio " 

iVu' ! ' '''"""""AI n', i i'^'i'i'f Hy " l )n 

';".": '' : "i'iV"i!;,.''| l ,! < :; ';! i : ii 'H u 



-^ ;: 'v:u;S^ 

.'/.,' '.i.J, 11 ; 1 ' 1 " 1 Altl '' i;i ' M " l<!t ' ll!U 



-vi: ";,- -y;, 

, -. . - i, ''V 'i'-'it-.M. AIT 
' 1 ' (AI -' 11 '' 



i"' 1 "-^:";".!; 1 ;:!:":^ 1 ^'-!.^ 

! " ! -----.~i -!IT ',, , ..""''"I'l'l'-iil W, 

u -.. , ^,i ,., ,'.;, v luii HviiU',.1! i 
I " ii "" 1 x '"'". i, ;; i ;;" 1 ,, A1 "',"' ii . 

! , ,. ' "". l!1 "i'l'"!ll i p|, I I'M 




''"""'"n 1 ; 1 ""'" ": ' i! ' '-"tlMilall, 

> <.i: , . . ,, ',,'' "' "" n'lvinifcd nlr. 

'" - >'. f ... r', i'" ," 1; "''" 1 ' ll i' '.mid, 

;, ,,, . i ""V, '; ""'' ii-"ii'Mfii * 
,. ,, ' ,',;:; - ' A ';"'i. Wi'iHia-iW- 

!,",";"''",;;; '..(,.-!, Mt,i,. lawsii 

( l ' - '*' '' ^'^"w'M l Ar 1 "" "^ 



' ''iiyliK-n f,,r |.', 
f/'wHah"""" 1 



i, Wllllnmi. 
i.ri uf nir- 



T 
.* S ii MM--. 

t 1 *- , ji c !!! Pi 
(..=,*< ., ,. f ^(t^i.^.ji,,, winjr I. 



Dte, 

'-** ' .. v. i!, n At I), l' B !l(, 

u' ,V *,:*''-"**' llit '*- (lllla ' **.!.<*' 
*'. s ,'s* i(i?<ji-.. Mt ft rnv Air Mtlttltl 

'ft|ft t P/p , v 'l.....|'h McHit, lllJ, ll.JfliHt. 

i-.!i!i (it! i HV^H AJJ Jlfllerlfll Atct, 



, , 

!?. Hi ',.!<! fts-.t tnIf,I#|Hr ,.( 11 

WMvun mi, .),.,, fur Air Mftterivl ArW, 
ABM -. lua of AMI, KMn, 



. Cftllf. *li- 
Dn of A NO 
lnHlatio Sr>; 
A KB, Cwlf- 



United Aircraft, Enat Hartford, Conn. $1,- 
044,060, Work on the auporaonic combus- 
tion rninjet program. Enst Hartford. Sys- 
tems iMifirmeorlnir Grouii, JtcHcaroh & Tech- 

*iJS? y *P, lv " ( AF SC). Wright -Patterson 
AFB, Ohio. 

Lockheed Aircraft, Marietta, Gn. 31,425,- 
000. Modification of the integrated flight 
control for the XV-4A aircraft. Marietta. 
byutcmf) EtiKineerliiE Grouji, Research A 
leclinoloiry pi v ., (AFSC), Wrieht-Patter- 
JM>II AFB, Ohio. 

ITT, Nutley. N.J. $23,086,137. Production 
of nirlxH-n Loran navigation notn and rc- 
Jntwl equipment, and for field cnsincoriiiB 
B , . r , B ,- *i, tlcy .- Aeronautical Systems Dlv., 
(Al-SC). Wright-Patterson AI-'D, Ohio. 
29 Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Buffalo, 
N.Y. 1,748.600. Analysis aud evaluation of 
lienotrntion nicls t-ITectivoncBH. lliiffnlo. Sya- 
tcmifi KuBlncerJng Group. Ilenearch & Tech- 
nology Dlv., (AFSC), Wright-Patterson 
AF11, Ohio. 

Boeing: Co.. Wichita, Kan. 511,327,805. 
Modi (lent Ion of 0-S2 aircraft. Wichita. 
Oklahoma CEty Air Materiel Area, (AFLO), 
Tinker AFI1, Oltln. 

Heridlx Corp,, Tetcrbovn, N.J. $1,887,414. 
Production of nircrnft flight instruments. 
Icterburo. Aeronautical Systems Div., 
(AFSO1, Wright-Patterson AFU, Ohio. 

Applied Technology, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif. 
30,020,710. Production of airborne elec- 
tronic equipment for lighter and rccou- 
imtafi4inco nlicrnft. Palo Alto. Warner 
IlohlriB Air Materiel Arcn, (AFI.O), Robins 
AM!, On. 

30 Northrop Corp., Hawthorne, OaUf. ?C,278, 
OH2. Production of long lead lime equip- 
ment Cor F~5 alrcrnft. Hawthorne. Aero- 
nautical Syfttoma Dlv., (AFSO), Wright. 
Pnttonion AFB, Ohio. 

North American Aviation, Anaheim, Calif. 
$2.000,000. Maintenance and modification of 
Minuttiinnn mlBHlle ituldnncc and control 
cfiulpmont. Anaheim. Ballistic Syatoma 
IJiv., (AFSO), Norton AFU, Calif. 

IIIIR)ICH Alrcrnft Co., Culver City, OallE. 
$1,101.101. Modification of Falcon air-to-air 
iniuHileB, Culver City. Aeronautical Syntoma 
I)Jv., (AF90), WrlRlit-PiUterflon AFD, 
Ohio, 



U.S.-FRG Select Firms 

To Develop V/TOL 
and V/STOL Aircraft 

Tho United Stiitos and tho Federal 
Hupubllc of Germany (PRG) haves 
HftlccUid two firniB to conduct Win pro- 
totypo tlnflnitlon plmao in thn joint 
davnlopmnnt of Vortical Take-Off 
Landing 1 /Short Take-Oft Tending 
(VTOL/KTOL) .fl ff htor aircraft; 
which could bo procured for test and 
iwiiluatlon. 

Republic Aviation, a division of 
Fail-child Hillor, Farmingdalo, LOUR' 
iHlaiwl, N.Y., and tho German firm 
KnbwlcklunKRtrinff-SUD of Munich, 
nrmnny, will nerfonn tho work 
undoi' the direction of tho System 
Program Ofilco, jointly manned by 
U.S. und FUG pnrsonnel. 

Tho dcciaioii to procure a test 
quantity of the prototype) aircraft 
will awn i t tho completion of the 
nUi<lios expected late next year. 



Lightning-Proof Fuel 

Cap Developed by 

U.S. Air Force 

A lightning-proof aircraft fuel 
filler cap has been developed for the 
Air Force by the Systems Engineer- 
ing Group at Wright-Patterson AFD, 
Ohio. 

The new cap was tested with man- 
made lightning at the Lightning and 
Transients Research Institute, Minne- 
apolis, Minn. The teats proved that 
the filler cap will not cause sparks 
inside tho aircraft fuel tank when 
the cap is struck by lightning 1 . 

Because of tho excellent path it 
provides to the external surfaces of 
tho aircraft wing, the cap is not 
damaged by high electrical currents. 

Special provisions have been made 
to seal the cap against high transient 
pressures resulting from a lightning 
.strike. In addition, the parts of the 
cap inside the fuel tank arc non- 
metallic. These design features are 
essential in preventing arcing inside 
tho fuel tank. 

Tho now fuel filler cap is inter- 
changeable) with many of the caps 
now used on aircraft. It will provide 
an added degree of safety to both 
military and civilian aircraft fuel 
systems. 



Maverick Contract- 
Definition Phase 
Contractors Selected 

The Air Force has selected the 
Hughes Aircraft Co. of Culver City, 
Calif, and North American Aviation 
of Columbus, Ohio, to proceed with 
the contract definition phase of the 
Maverick (AGM-65A) air-to-ground 
missile program. 

Contracts valued at about $3 mil- 
lion will be awarded to both com- 
panies for the work. The purpose of 
tho contract definition phase is to 
verify the preliminary Maverick de- 
sign and engineering, and to provide 
information necessary to award a 
definitive contract for development 
and production. 

The Maverick is planned as a non- 
nuclear air-to-ground missile for use 
with the F-111A, A-7D and F~4 air- 
craft. 

Tho Maverick program is man- 
aged by tho Aeronautical Systems 
Div., Air Force Systems Command, 
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. 



DEFENSE PRIME CONTRACT AWARDS 
TO SMALL BUSINESS 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

July-Sept. 1966 July-Sept. 1965 

Procurement from All Firms $10,564,813 $7,496,407 

Procurement from Small Business Finns 2,042,902 1,474,261 

Percent Small Business 19.3 ig/7 



Zero Defects Awards 
Program Included in 
Amended Instruction 

A Zero Defects Awards Program 
for contractors of the Defense De- 
partment has been incorporated into 
DOD Instruction 4156.12. "DOD Zero 
Defects Program." 

The prog-rain consists of Participa- 
tion, Achievement and Craftsmanship 
Awards. These awards are designed 
to recognize Chose contractors who 
participate in the DOD-sponaorcd 
Zero Defects program and demon- 
strate significant progress and 
achievements in meeting contrnctor- 
established performance goals, 

^Guidelines and criteria for meeting 1 
eligibility requirements for receiving 
the thrco levels of Zero Defects 
awards are detailed in the incloaure 
to the amended instruction. 



Civil Works Pro [o eta 

(Continued /rom Page 24) 

chloride pollution; expansion of water 
quality monitoring program; hydro- 
logical investigations. $46,400,000. 
WASHINGTON 

Skagit Kiver. (PC) Channel, levee 
and recreation improvements. $5,804,- 
000. 

WEST VIRGINIA 

West Pork River. (MP) Stonewall 

Jnckson Reservoir. $34,500,000. 

NAVIGATION SURVEYS 

Great Lakes (particularly Lake On- 
tario and LaUc Erie), 

Mexico Beach, Fla. 

FLOOD CONTROL SURVEYS 

Watershed und streams of Alaska, 
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, tho Virgin 
Islands, and the Mississippi River 
below Cairo, 111, 

Watersheds and streams draining 
into: Great Lakes and St. Lawrence 
River (within tho United States), 
and the Gulf of Mexico (along 
Texas coastline excluding the Eio 
Grande River), 

Arkansas, White and Red Rivers und 
tributaries (excluding their drain- 
ago lying in tho alluvial valley of 
the Mississippi River), 

Cibolo Creek, Prcsido, Tex. 

Great South Bay, N.Y. 

Pacific Palisades Area at and in tho 
vicinity of Los Angeles County, 
Calif. 

Souris River and Red Eivcr of tho 
north and tributaries (including 
adjacent streams in Minnesota 
draining into Canada). 

Spring Valley Creek, Sweetwatcr 
River, Calif. 



OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 2O3O1 



POSTAGE AND FEES PAID 



OFFICIAL BUSINESS 



Celestial-lnertial Lab Planned 
for Holloman AFB in 1967 

A super-precision test laboratory that will resemble a plane- 
tarium is in the planning- stages at the Air Force Systems Com- 
mand's Missile Development Center, Holloman AFB, N. M. With 
construction requested for FY 1967, the domed structure is in- 
tended to house the most advanced celestial-inertial guidance test 
equipment available for evaluating the guidance systems of our 
nation's military vehicles. 

"Future military guidance systems will require automatic meth- 
ods for identifying and tracking stars, planets, satellites, even 
the earth itself, with extreme accuracy," said Edgar B. Godley, 
chief of the Missile Development Center's Celestial-lnertial Branch, 
m explaining the need for this new test facility. "Likewise our 
measurements must be an order of magnitude more precise than 
the quantity we are evaluating," he continued. 

The concept for future advanced evaluation was developed over 
tne last six years by the center's Directorate of Guidance Test 
fh An S n1 ?* h - as b ???i, added the results of a study made by 
the mlin fece oTA ^ 1S10n of . Gene ?' al Motors Corp. for 
tial " ' ' 



Awars 
SCRAMJET Contracts 



The polar-axis fixture, on which an entire celestial-inertial guid- 
ance system may be mounted for test purposes, will be driven "at 
?n, n ln f?W to ma ? ntain the toed spatia position necessary 
tn ^n teStSt SuiToundi ^ this tracker platforni, a domed 
ture will carry as many as five or six star simulators as 
sun, moon and and planet simulators, for the purposS of 

SyStem ' to tests fi ' ee of * *- 



fiscal year period 1969-1970, uetei lests ' ls Planned for the 



. Kri! has 

uwarded threo atudy contracts 
for a high-altitude, hypcrsimic, 
SCRAMJKT-poworcd crniHO ve- 
hide. Thrco contraetw, lolnliiiK 
$900,000, wero nwunlcd to 
Lockhecd-Californiu Co,, Nnrtli 
American Aviation, Inc., an<] 
McDonnell Aircraft Corp, 

SCHAM.TKT, an acronym fr 
Superaonic Combustion Knnijoi, 
is a revolutionary power plant 
being 1 developed and toHlitl for 
the Aoro Propulsion Laboratory, 
Wrifi-ht-Pattorson AFH, Oliln. 
The ramjet onpflno UHOU hiRh 
speed air as n comprosHitr imd 
burns hlffh-onorjjfy JunJ to lnw*l- 
its speed into hypovKonic VHII^CM/ 

Under the study contrncl-Ji, 
the contractors will dovolop ve- 
hicle design concepts and idon- 
tify military miasionrt to bo 
performed by a SCHAMIK'r- f 
powered vehicle. Phaao.s of Iho! 
12-month contracts also Indiuta! 
application studies to nintoh vtv^ 
hicle and mission, determination! 
of mission operational clmnio- 1 
toristics, and conduct of vohicJe 
parametric studies to evaluate 
alternate designs for a hyper- 
sonic vehicle. 

The work will be performed 
under the direction of tho Don- 
for Advanced Systems I'lan- 
AFSC Aeronautical Sy- 



' g-ftorwoH 
AFB, Capt. Richard J. Monna 
is project manager for tho ve- 
hicle.