# Full text of "Design of a three span double track reinforced concrete railroad arch bridge"

## See other formats

Design of a 3 Span Double Track Reinforced Concrete Railroad Arch Bridge C. S. Millard G. A. Haggander 907 624.6 M61 ARMOUK INST.OFTECH.LJB, CHICASD. 1 lUlno t' LIbr.iries AT 82 Millard, Chauncey S. Design of a three span double track reinforced *-- . 4-- ■ f- n- '^- ■i- -:^ , f: •k •}- -ir DESIGN! OF A THREE SPA IT "^^ DOUBLE TRACK REI?T FORCED CO 1^I CRETE RAILROAD ARCH BRIDGE A THESIS PRESENTED BY and ^kl-(2^c-^ to the PRESIDE IT T and FACULTY OF THE ARMOUR I H S T I T U T E OF T E C H ZT L G for the degree of BACHELOR OF SCISImCE IIT CIVIL ENGIXEERIITG HAVING COICPLETED THE PRESCRIBED COURSE OF STUDY IN CIVIL E AT G I N E S R I H G ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PAUL V.GALVIN LIBRARY 35 WEST 33RD STREET CHICAGO, IL 60616 Chicago, 111., June Ist, 1907. Dean of Culture Studies. >*' The bridge, as designed, is a rjroposed structurb for the C. V. I'T. W. R. R. across the ITorth Branch of the Chicago River, about four miles above the head of navigation. At the present time a v/ooden pile trestle carries the railroad across a rat'aer shalloif; wooded valley. This vallej- of the i;.pper waters of the ITorth Branch has been under consideration, by various improvenent associations, as a desirable link in an Outer Park System for the city of Ciiicago. V/ith ohis fact in nind, the bridge was provided with two forty foot arches to acconnriodate future driveways. METHOD OF DESIGiJ. The method of design used in the aiv^lyses of the arches, was the graphical system developed by Ivlr. Burton R. Leffler, Bridge Engineer for the L. S. oc M. S. R. R., in his treatise on "The Elastic Arch." In indicating the method of design, the cal- culations for one of the forty foot arches will be explained. THE FORTY FOOT ARCH. Two assumptions must be nade to start with, (l) the thick- ness of the arch ring at the crovm, (2) tlie curve of the intrados. The thickness of the ring at the cro^vn was assigned to be 2 feet, the curve of the Intrados v;as struck from 3 centers. The theory is based on an equal nuraber of horiiiontal di- visions of the arch ring. The divisions wer^; made on the dotted ordinates with an ordinate at the center. See Plates I, II and III. This deteriiiines ^ at the crown, ^.-here dl is the length of ^ a division iieas^jred along the gravity axis, 'which is yet undeter- mined. Por a trial valae, dl is measured along the mtrados. I ia talcen at the csnter of each division of the gravity axis, as- suming a eidth of arch ring of 1 foot. The reiriainder of the arch ring must be taken so that — is a constant. Where al' and l' are taken at the springing of the elastic ai"ch. dl'=2.3o dl= 2 I =11 ^'"T^ h.= depth of the ring at the springing. h' - 2»5j X 12 _ „ -, .666 '='•-'■ The span of 40 feet is not the true span of the elastic arch. The span of the elastic arch lies "between the points v:here the tangents to the arch are fixed in direction. These points may he located at that portion of the ring where a sudden enlarge- ment of section takes plstce, or where -r- ceases to he a constant. In the arc]-- under consideration, this length of span was taken as 32 feet. LOADS. The live load was taken as the equivalent uniform load for Cooper's ElffO with lOOp impact added. The load was considered to he distributed over a width of 12 feet. Prorri Cooper's Specifica- tions for Railroad liridges, the equivalent i^niform load for E40 with a span of 32 feet = 7120# per foot. Por EI60 this equals -r X 7120 = 10680#. With lOO;:^ impact added this equals 213 60# per foot. In designing the arch., for convenience, a section 1 foot wide was used. The load on a width of one foot = 1780#. 1800# per linear foot was the load used. The voltime of the dead load was scaled from the drawing- The weight of the earth fill was taken as 100# per cuhic foot, and the w^eif^ht of the arch ring 150# per cvtic foot. The volv^.e of fill at section = 1.5 x 2 = 3 cuDic feet. The weight of earth = 3 x 100# = 300,-^, The weight of the arch ring = 2 x 2 x 150 = 600#. The total load at the croTvn = 900# + 3600^ = 4500#. The length of a division was taken as 2ft. and thjerefore the live load per section = Z&004h THE DETERMINATION 0? THE TRuE VALUE OP "H. " In order to determine the naximun stresses at the various sections, at least three positions of the live lead rust he con- sidered. The positions used were 1/2, 3/4 and full loaa. Talc- ing the position of half load as an example, the load line was laid off vertically, each, load being nunhered corresponding to its position along the arch. Assuming H, the horizontal thrust as 40000#, a trial stress diagram, and equilihriun polygon was con- structed. The next portion of the prohlem, was to locate a line m n, (See Plates) so that the sijan of the ordinates. called " ordinates, from tiiis line to the trial equilihriujii pol;v"gcn, would he zero. All ordinates were '"leasured to the sa^-'-ie scale as t'lat of the arc)'., z/s inch = 1 foot. The method of deternjning m rn,can better he understood \iy referring to the table on Plate I. Column 1 cor- ta.ins the nurber of the section. Coluinns 2 and 3 give thi.e ordi- rates to the trial equilil:ri\jn polygon on the right and left sides of the center; 4 gives the difference betv/'een the right and left ordinates of the sane section; 5 reives the siirr":;:ation of these differences. Z(^c// ^ ^dz i--3d3 ^ Vc/y) This siirrr'nation ^var v.sed in +he foi'^r'la for deterriining v w W^'ere n equals the nurater of equal Fpaces that the arch was di- vided into. To determine t]xe direction froii in v\^, v vi' v/as laid off ahove V and v, ir dravm . R, the sum of the ordiniites in col- umns 2 and 3 of the table = 48.95. The formi.ila, sn:y gives the distance that n .a, is ahove v, \v at the niid-ordinate of the polygon. _R_ = ^8^95 = 2.38 TVt-l 17 Having dra^vn m m, parallel to v, w, the in ordinates v/ere measured. These ordinates were recorded in colvjnns 6 and 7. The y ordinates are given in column S of the tahle. They were measured from the line joining the springing points o y^ to the gravity axis of the arch ring. The line k kj^ras ^ext dravm parallel to o v, and at a distance above it equal to _ ^SL The line m m,cv.ts the polygon at E and E^. Projecting these points upv;ard to e and e,, in the line k k^, locates 2 points in the re- quired pressure curve. The Ic ordinates v/ere measured from Ic k, to the gravity axis of the arch. The si-^mrmticnsz^T-TTW and^7iy--!>corded in ccliTirDTS 12 to 14, are the enms of the prodi'^cts of rn, y and k. "To determine the tme pole distance, the formula ■^— 1^ X Trial Pole Distance is neces;jary. If the true value of H was as£^a:ned in the first place, tlien^ny =^hy. True Pole Distance = ||-^- ^ 40000 = 47100#. To locate the true pole P, P, r v/ac dra,wn paral3 el to in m, , P then lies on a horizontal line tlirough r. T Mc In the fundaroental equation ^ ~ T "^ T~~ ^ ~ stress, T the thriist , A the area, M the moment, c the distance to any fitre and I the moment of inertia of the section. In this anal^/sis of the arch the effect of j- has heen oi^iitted. T By experirr.ent it has beer, determined that the effect of t is to decrease the value of H. The experiments of Prof. Hov;e h^ve shown that for an arch havinfi; a rise of ■5- the span, the true value of H is 93-l/2> of the approximate value; for a rise of 1/6, S6;o; and for a rise of l/lO, 69:1. In the arch, designed, the rise was 3 feet 10 inches, and the span 32 feet, giving a ratio of o— ^-r* S" interpolating "between the values already men- tioned the correct percentage for H v;as determined. True Pole Distance = 72.6;b of the approximate value. Having determined the trte pole distance, a nev; stress diagram and equilibrium polygon vras drav/n. e and e, being points on the required curve, the new polygon must he drawn from one of these points, and as a ch.eck on the accuracy of the work, it should pass through the other point. Ilie pret^suro curve having "been located, it only renair.s to determine the unit stresses UNIT 5TRE35E5 H* The above figure is a side view of a portion of an arch ring contained "between two planes perpendicular to the neutral surface n n' and mahing an angle oc in circuJLar measure, before strain, between them. A vertical plane ir^idway between the faces of the arch intersects the neutral surface in the line n n' = As feet in length, v/hicZi may be calJed the neutral line. The forces considered all act in this plane. Let R be the resultant of all external forces acting upon the section passing through r . Conceive a;pplied at n tvTO opposed forces +R and -R, each equal and parallel to R. The single force R is thus replaced hv a couple RR and a force +R acting at n. The latter may be resolved into components T and IT, tangential and normal to n n' at n. The force T causes a unifon:i shortening in all the fibres. The force N is a s}ieari:ig force and jnaiT- be neglected in de-termining the longitudinal stresses. The couple RK is principally effected in claanging the curvature of the arch and its nonent is nost conveniently found ty "■-.t'ltiplying its horizontal cor^ponent H by tiie vertical distance from n to R, v;hich 7/e can call t feet. Then ~re liave M = Ht,in foot po\/nas (j.). Under the action of this couple the angle oc is changed to or' and the curvature is increased if R exits the section "oelow n, and decreased when R exits the section ahove n. Gall or'- cxT =^o<c and regard M as right handed. Call distance of any fihre from n n' i^ , this he ing + ahox'-e and - celoiv. The length of the f ihre hefore flexure ^/il^y- Kcx' after flexurb = A~5 -^ l^^' its change of length is 1/ f<x'- oT ) z^ l^Ac< Calling its cross section a in sq.uare feet and the unit stress di^e to jY = f i:ounds per square foot, the stress on the fibre of concrete and of steel fa - -^^^/ an^^ /^) Since f = elo-^j-^ation of fi'cre. -g since I length of fibre ^ ^ In (3) 71 = 0^ -.There E/= modulus of elasticity of concrete and E^ = Exodulus of elasticity of steel. A^ -h ^oC can be re- placed by A3 '.vithout appreciable error. T>ic sujii of all the stresses d^Jie to flexure on the entire section at n for concrete or for -Steel The so-ment of the stress (^3. fj ahoi?.t n on any fihre is(^afv;) Let ly = ^no^ent of inertia of the concrete of area k, in feet, and 1^ = moment of inertia of the steel of area A^ in feet Z^y'^a = Z^ (^l/^cz) for concref-e- = Z fi/"^^^J for ^tee/ ^ ==^/ ^ rL^nJ,) Ac< = ^/Z v^/7. / / -^/ -r / /u^ Let f; =■ stress per square inch on an extre^ae fibre of the concrete -/hose distance from the neutral axis is v, feet. Then fro:P. /^; /. = ^^~ ^^ ' A3 and eliminating ^^ hetTveen this e equation and (6) ;7e get -f - M ^^ and for steel, Tz - -zr 10 The direct thrust on tiae arch must now bw found. Let P the uniform compresaion on concrete of area A, and let np 'oe the unit compression on steel of area A_2> Then the total corapresbion on a section = F'f/l / t n /jz) This is eiual and opposite to T. from which ^ /jii-n/iz ^^ ^,i-n/]z The total stress "i^oiild nov,' he the su:r. of the "bending stresses and the direct thrust. Let s, and s^ he the stress in pounds per sq'.>are foot on the concrete and steel respect irely at the upper and lower edges. Then Mv, -7/ /- /7 Jz S^ - / 71 ^ A^//^ ] As an exanple take point 1 on the 80 foot arch. Live load Thrust = 100,000# Temperature Thrust = 15,6Q0# T = 115,600?^ Live load Sending Moment = 133,000 ft. pds . Temperature " " = -:rO,000 " " M = 173,000" " " 11 A, = 3 square feet A_g= .O-ioo s^i<are leet n = 15, I; = 2.26, I^= .Ohoo x 1.25 Y^ = l,c, 7^= 1.25 S/ _ 1 15^600 + 175 ,000 x, 1_. 5^^_^ 144 5 + 15 X .0435 "2.25 x".0455''x' iTl.o ^ -770 , ijounds per square incn Sg g. lln_,600 + 175^000 x 1.25__ _ .^ 144 3 -f- ir; X .0433 -2. 2o* +-'l'5* x' ■.0'4o3''x l"2?j ^ -10,150 ^ . . + 5 600 P^^^'-'-^^s per square men. TElflPERATUKE' STRESSES. Let to = rise or fall of tenperature in degrees Panreniieit > D = span in feet f = coefl'icient of expansion of concrete. The lengtheninf: or shortening of the span is Dtf. This is tne horizontal jnove-ment along the X axis and is also given by the fon:aiila EI J which is one of the equations lea-din^ up to the fundarental equa- tions . 12 Since the end tanfrents are fixed in direction 2/t - O v/hich. means that H acts alon« the line K K^. /tl/^ is the sane as^-^^^^^which v/as found in computing the true pole distance. The range of te^Tiueratiire vvas 2S'' . If t/ie arch v/as oullt at 55° the range .?ould be from 25° to 31°. The concret;e is quite massive and is also covered with earth so tl-iat this ranp;e is un- doubtedly sufficient. As an exa'nple we v/ili fina H for tne 80 foot arch. I=|- dl = 4 D=64 t =23° E = 144 X 2,000,000 /Z^^ 102.76, f = .0000053 \ X '54 X 23 X .0000056 x 2000000 x 1^4 H = 2 — ; -n-7vT~r--c = 15,o00#. 4 X 102.7 6 ' ?0miDATI01IS. The direct thrust of the SO foot arch for full load is 125,000 pounds. The direct thi'ust of the 40 foot arch for no load is 48,000 pounds. The weight of tht concrete and filling between the points considered in determining the above t-nrusts is 60,600 pounds. Combining t?iese graphically and obtaining the resultant gave a thrust of 135,000 pounds acting diagonally thro'ugh the center of the pier base. The vertical component of this is 17 2,000 pounds which must be taken by tne foundation per 13 foot of width. ConaiderinK the arch as 24 feet wide (since the load from each track wae diBtribbted over Ik^ feet) v/e get a total load on the foundation of 4,128,000 pounds or 2,064 tons. Thisi load is taken "by 98 piles giving a load of 21 tons on one pile. Tnit> rcay soerr exf;esuive, hut the impact \7hich v«afc> included in the thrusta never reaches the piles, but is absorbed by the inertia of the fillinr and concrete. 1 1 ^ I i^ ;!° - , J s ^ ?lf s. 5.1 S. §: j! 6|5S "•i^ ^ ■*! " ' ? " «?„>. ?n ^.•5 B * ? 8« ? So| Q ft N |3 S 5 ^ SS E~ -.« «? ?S 3 ly< . » I ;it >H s 'f 5 ; ?;; s = % -, ? s 5 f ii ^■« „ ., !? 3 s S 'bf ^ .- <« 1 V ^ . K^. 5|ir,il 550^ ^^ \ \ \ 1 1 ^ S s s T 1 ? * ! 1 * » i J 8 ^ ti 'It « ^ ? a 5 5 ?■ f N ^ »l 1 *> « ? ? " 8 ? « ? $ n ^1 . ; » • ? ? s I; s °i 6 E » N s * S ? 8 ? ! ^ - » 5 > S S S » ^ V ^ s ? X S ? 5 ° S ? ^ » s a i5 s S P s ° 1 ^ -, .^ ft s ^1 ? ? ! 5 - •i ^ s k) S ; S ? - o . 1 1 lo . «j ^ |y -o ^' P i I .1 « 1 ^ 5^ 2 « i; 5 'i * ^ ^ -i ^ ^ f 1: ^ ? ; s ! S 5 5 s f -. S ! f s nS. 5 ^ >- »i 2 P ^^ *J « ? 1 ? ? ? « s ? ^1 . 8 * I S 8 3 te S °* 1- E . ^ 9 ^ t ? ft 8 § s I "f - . s ' ! s s 8 ? ° 'i t^: ^ o o o 1 ? > o » » c ? J ^ -, S ! X s « S s J ■^ V s 5 ? s »1 8 S s ! o N n ■» '• « -■ r, 1 1' cs % J flf^. ' \ ^ I 'i I 1 1 1 Ov I* / _/ ^/ / J I 1 >, " ^ v''l*-l'^?K- < , O 'S:' ■> , , 1 5 ^ •^ ' _^;s??U^"', ^ p Hi'' :! ' ! ' ! : i i!9l.| ln\\\VA\ _// A .\ \ \ \ Hi !S % Sir ix iSj j; & § '^ V N 1 BKlilElilililii^l (\i K ^ ^^ ^ > *? : I -k I i .. ^ ^ N ^ ^ nnm .WJWiWft JlilJl JKaHRiMJ-..} .( .t-..i:i;ri r^[i!wjmtm /! /lit^. ."i f o sra.hJo.z / Tn COA/C/?/r72 4 IniHI LOCA T/OA/ /'i.jAM OF- PffOPOSCD f?C://\/FVRC£D CONCR£:. A/?c/-/ Ra/lroad Sr/dsc y^a^ THE C. &N.w:f?.fp. OSS THf: A/Off Tfl B/^ANCH -/^THcCf^/CAGO /^/ycf^ >^ \ .r /^o jbe Jo/7/7 Sc \Vei^ S/^M) ===== ^^^^ c^r/7ers \jE£:/x'//va D^F*/P/FTAr^/VT. 5 Or ' '^cSl _, 1^^^', P2 2-0- Oi,/ /-. O^t S-0 i g^ s A V V .■? ■> i? - 'I l^iiH 1 1 i /^/ILF Sect/on DE5/GN Of Th£s/s Of Half S£cr/o/v (^t23'^i&e^it<£l A t\l t v ■jt- i* ■? ^ f <f'