Skip to main content

Full text of "Did the Phoenicians discover America?"

See other formats


DID  THE  PHOENICIANS  DISCOVER 
AMERICA  ? 


THE   PHOENICIANS 

UPON  the  Erythrean  sea  the  people  live 

Who  style  themselves  Phoenicians.     These  are  sprung 

From  the  true  Erythrean  stock, 

From  the  sage  race,  who  first  essayed  the  deep, 

And  wafted  merchandise  to  coasts  unknown. 

These  too,  digested  first  the  starry  choir, 

Their  motions  marked,  and  called  them  by  their  name. 

Dionysius — Pliny,  v.  965. 


AZTEC   CALENDAR   OR   WATER  STONE 


Frontispiece 


Did  the  Phoenicians 
discover  America? 


BY 

THOMAS   CRAWFORD  JOHNSTON 

SAN   FRANCISCO,  CALIFORNIA 

HONORARY   MEMBER   OF  THE  GEOGRAPHICAL  SOCIETY 
OF  CALIFORNIA,    ETC. 


WITH   FOREWORD   BY 

OLIPHANT   SMEATON,   M.A.,    F.S.A. 


Reprinted  By 

ST.  THOMAS  PRESS 

P.  O.  Box  35096,  Houston,  Texas 
1965 

lonfcon 

JAMES   NISBET    fcf   CO.,   LIMITED 
22    BERNERS   STREET,  W. 


HA  I  to 


b  10*+ 


n 


FOREWORD 


THE  problem  of  the  original  discovery  of  America 
is  no  new  one.  Ever  since  indisputable  traces  of 
the  presence  of  the  early  Scandinavian  Rovers  or 
Vikings  were  noted  on  the  north-east  coast  of  the 
great  western  continent,  speculation  has  been  busy 
as  to  the  character,  habits,  and  race  of  these  primal 
colonists.  One  fact  soon  emerged  that  the  Scandi 
navians  were  far  from  being  the  first  to  land  on  and 
colonise  portions  of  the  vast  territory.  Traces  were 
discovered  of  earlier  visits  that  throw  the  date  back 
upwards  of  2500  years  or  even  3000  years  to  about 
the  epoch  of  the  Trojan  War  ;  while  other  theories 
cast  it  still  further  "into  the  deep  backward  and 
abysm  of  time/' 

The  present  volume  in  many  respects  breaks  new 
ground  in  the  geographico-ethnological  study  of  the 
globe.  The  author,  Mr.  Thomas  Crawford  Johnston, 
studies  the  remains  which  the  Phoenicians  have  left 
in  various  parts  of  the  world,  such  as  the  shores  of 
the  Levant,  of  Spain,  and  of  Britain,  where  traces 
of  their  art,  of  their  trade,  and  of  their  commercial 
and  colonial  settlements  were  most  in  evidence. 
These  he  compares  with  those  left  in  various  parts 
of  America,  and  comes  to  the  conclusion  that 
they  are  all  so  closely  allied  as  to  have  emanated 
from  the  same  source.  Mr.  Crawford  Johnston  wins 
support  for  his  theory  by  the  calm,  methodical, 
systematic  way  in  which  every  item  of  information 


vi       THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

bearing  on  the  subject  is  carefully  weighed.  He 
makes  out  a  strong  case  for  the  Phoenicians  being 
the  original  discoverers  of  America.  He  also  con 
tends  that  the  "Ophir"  of  Scripture  was  situated 
in  America,  in  support  of  this  theory  adducing  some 
remarkable  evidences  of  Phoenician  settlement  on 
the  American  mainland.  Though  the  fact  has  long 
been  known  that  the  early  Toltec  and  Aztec  civilisa 
tion  of  Central  America  was  not  indigenous,  the  in 
formation  which  Mr.  Johnston  cites  in  support  of 
his  theory  adds  materially  to  the  sum  total  of  our 
knowledge  of  the  case. 

To  all  interested  in  ethnological  as  well  as  an 
thropological  science,  I  would  warmly  recommend 
this  volume  as  one  calculated  to  please  as  well  as 
to  instruct.  They  will  find  here,  apart  from  the 
argument,  a  fund  of  interesting  facts  that  throws 
light  on  many  disputed  points  regarding  early  tribal 
customs  and  acts  of  sacrificial  worship.  For  the 
land  of  "  Ophir  "  having  been  in  America,  he  forges 
a  really  strong  chain  of  argument  which  students 
of  the  subject  would  do  well  to  weigh  carefully  and 
calmly.  No  one  will  rise  from  the  perusal  of  the 
treatise  without  feeling  convinced  that  it  has  been 
written  by  a  man  possessed  of  strong  convictions, 
of  keen  reasoning  powers,  of  varied  scholarship, 
and  of  a  most  reverent  mind.  I  have  perused  the 
work  with  pleasure  and  profit. 

OLIPHANT    SMEATON. 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

INTRODUCTORY          .  .....  xi 


CHAPTER    I 
THE  PHOENICIANS  IN  THE  MAKING 

Early  history — The  Hyksos  or  Shepherd  Kings — Their  rule  in 
Egypt — In  Bahrein  Islands — Removal  from  Persian 
Gulf  to  Mediterranean — The  Hyksos  in  Palestine — Union 
with  Phoenicians — Commercial  and  manufacturing  pros 
perity — Some  results — Phoenician  route  to  Syria — Baby 
lonian  and  Egyptian  influences — Evolution  of  the  Jew 


CHAPTER    II 

THE  PHOENICIAN  LAND  TRADE 

Region  of  Phoenicia — Colony  of  Sidon — Phoenician  art  and 
craftsmanship  —  Commercial  expansion  —  Arabian  and 
Babylonian  trade — Importance  of  the  former — Its 
nature  and  transport — Phoenicians  as  the  carriers  of  the 
world — Western  trade  .  .  .  .  .  .  32 


CHAPTER    III 
NAVIGATION  AND  SEA  TRADE 

Extent  of  the  Phoenician  marine — Causes  of  its  remarkable  de 
velopment — Nature  of  early  voyages — Phoenician  policy 
non-aggressive — First  Phoenician  colonial  settlements — 
The  ships  of  Tharshish — Their  testimony  to  Phoenician 
seamanship — Trade  monopoly  in  the  Eastern  Mediter 
ranean — Also  in  the  Atlantic — Xenophon's  description 
of  a  Phoenician  armed  merchant-ship — Phoenicians  pre 
eminent  as  shipbuilders  and  navigators  .  .  .  -55 


viii     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

PAGE 

CHAPTER    IV 

THE  PHOENICIANS  AND  THE  COMPASS 

The  Aztec  Calendar  or  Water  Stone  described — Its  connection 
with  the  origin  of  the  compass — Did  the  Chinese  invent 
this  instrument  ? — The  Phoenicians  and  the  compass — 
Its  importance  to  their  naval  expansion — Primitive  com 
pass  familiar  to  early  navigating  nations — Instrument 
closely  identified  with  Phoenician  civilisation — Bactellium 
and  the  discovery  of  the  Pole  Star  due  to  the  Phoenicians  83 

CHAPTER    V 
PHOENICIAN  AND  JEW  IN  CO-OPERATION 

Phoenician  desire  for  Eastern  expansion — Trade  with  India — 
Persian  Gulf  Settlements  the  base  of  more  distant  navi 
gation — Phoenicians  and  Israelites  unite  for  commercial 
purposes — Friendship  of  Hiram,  King  of  Tyre,  and 
David,  King  of  Israel — Its  important  results — Phoenicia's 
obligations  to  the  Jewish  people — Jewish  influence  on 
Phoenician  religious  thought — Commercial  treaty  of 
Solomon  and  Hiram — How  it  profited  both  countries 
— Fleet  of  Solomon  and  Hiram  and  its  destination — 
Phoenicians  as  silver  importers  .  .  .  .  .105 

CHAPTER   VI 
THE  WHEREABOUTS  OF  OPHIR 

The  Ophir  of  the  Hebrews — Route  pursued  by  Solomon  and 
Hiram's  fleet — Evidence  afforded  by  crew  and  cargo — 
Testimony  of  the  Scythians  and  Thracians — Evidences 
of  Phoenician  civilisation  on  American  mainland — Early 
civilisation  of  Central  America  not  indigenous — Votanic 
tradition  and  its  significance — Nomenclature  of  Pacific 
Islands  as  a  clue — Polynesians  of  Eastern  Mediterranean 
origin  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .129 

CHAPTER  VII 

HEBREW,  PHOENICIAN,  SCYTHIAN,  AND  THRACIAN  IN 
THE  PACIFIC 

Samoan  traditions,  beliefs,  and  usages — Their  Phcenicio- 
Hebraic  source — Phoenician  source  of  the  Tahitian  re 
ligious  cult 149 


CONTENTS  ix 


CHAPTER    VIII 
THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  AZTEC 

Problem  of  the  unity  of  the  human  race — How  related  to  the 
Biblical  account  of  the  Creation — Ancient  civilisation  of 
Central  and  South  America — Problems  which  it  suggests. 
— Did  the  fleet  of  Solomon  and  Hiram  discover  America  ? 
— Asiatic  origin  of  the  first  American  population — Was 
the  Ophir  of  Solomon  and  Hiram's  fleet  the  Pacific  slopes 
of  the  American  Continent  ? — Testimony  of  native  records 
of  Mexico  and  Central  America — Humboldt's  opinion — 
What  may  be  learned  from  the  constitution  and  structure 
of  the  native  society  of  Central  America  .  .  .  .182 

CHAPTER    IX 
THE  ANCIENT  AMERICAN  CIVILISATION 

Constituent  parts  of  ancient  American  civilisation — The  region 
described — Maya  and  Nahua  civilisations — Their  identity 
of  origin — Aztec  as  the  representative  of  Nahua  civilisa 
tion — The  foreign  civiliser  in  Mexico — Composite  source 
of  Pacific  civilisation  explained — The  part  played  by  the 
Phoenicians  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  199 


CHAPTER    X 

EASTERN    MEDITERRANEAN    AND    AMERICAN   CIVILISA 
TIONS  COMPARED 

Similarities  as  shown  by  commercial  system,  use  of  dyes, 
woollen  and  cotton  manufactures,  precious  metals,  glass 
manufactures,  pearl  fishing,  tanning,  tattooing,  imple 
ments  of  war,  gymnasia,  religion,  laws,  &c.  .  .  .  207 


CHAPTER    XI 
CONCLUSION 

List  of  some  of  the  more  apparent  correspondences  found  to 
exist  between  the  people  inhabiting  the  shores  of  the 
Eastern  Mediterranean,  and  those  of  Central  America — 
Quotation  of  or  reference  to  authorities  on  which  the 
argument  is  founded 248 


ILLUSTRATIONS 

AZTEC  CALENDAR  STONE     .         .         .         Frontispiece 


INTRODUCTORY 

DURING  a  sojourn  that  covered  the  major  portion 
of  two  years  spent  among  the  islands  of  the  Pacific 
that  stretch  from  the  coasts  of  California  to  the 
northern  shores  of  New  Zealand,  my  attention  was 
so  powerfully  arrested  by  evidences  of  the  presence 
in  these  regions  of  the  early  civilisations  of  the 
Eastern  Mediterranean  that  I  was  led  to  give 
careful  and  extended  inquiry  as  to  the  channels 
through  which  they  could  have  been  conveyed  to 
this  remote  and  isolated  territory. 

It  did  not  at  first  occur  to  me  that  any  connec 
tion  could  be  established  between  the  civilisation 
of  the  Eastern  Mediterranean  and  that  of  Central 
America,  and  in  consequence  of  this  the  scope  of 
the  investigation  at  the  beginning  was  of  a  much 
more  limited  nature  than  it  later  assumed. 

As  I  proceeded  with  the  collection  of  data  bearing 
on  this  problem  I  came,  in  course  of  time,  to  realise 
that  I  had  in  my  possession  material  that  offered 
something  more  than  a  clue  to  the  solution  of  the 
great  enigma  presented  by  the  population  of  the 
American  Continent,  and  in  this  belief  I  pursued 
the  research  on  larger  lines  until  the  information 
gathered  was  of  a  sufficiently  valuable  character 
to  warrant  its  submission  to  the  scientific  world. 

In  consequence  of  this  I  presented  a  draft  of 
the  research  and  the  conclusions  to  which  it  pointed 


xii      THE    PHOENICIANS    AND   AMERICA 

to  the  Geographical  Society  of  California,  which 
undertook  its  publication  in  the  form  of  a  special 
bulletin  under  the  caption  "  Did  the  Phoenicians 
discover  America  ?  ' 

This  paper  did  not  claim  to  be  a  complete  solu 
tion  of  the  great  enigma,  but  it  provided  what  was 
believed  to  be  a  clue  which,  if  followed  up,  would 
lead  to  such  a  solution. 

It  was  not  my  attention  at  that  time  to  pursue 
the  investigation  further  than  this  point,  for  other 
matters  of  a  pressing  nature  just  then  demanded 
my  undivided  attention.  My  interest  in  the  subject, 
however,  did  not  flag,  and  as  in  course  of  time  I 
came  to  the  possession  of  a  larger  leisure,  I  again 
took  up  the  thread  of  the  investigation.  In  course 
of  years  of  somewhat  persistent  study,  I  came  to 
realise  that  the  facts  ascertained,  when  woven 
into  a  connected  and  inter-related  form,  would 
supply  all  the  light  that  was  really  necessary  to 
provide  a  rational  solution  as  to  the  source  from, 
and  the  channels  through,  which  the  population  of 
the  Pacific  Islands,  and  at  least  the  central  portion 
of  the  American  Continent,  were  derived.  Accord 
ingly  that  portion  of  the  data  in  my  possession 
requisite  to  attain  this  object  has  been  woven 
together  in  the  following  pages. 

When  beginning  the  compilation  of  this  material 
I  fully  realised  the  almost  insuperable  difficulties 
that  confronted  the  individual  who  undertook  such 
a  task,  for  that  portion  of  ancient  history  with  which 
the  research  is  more  immediately  concerned  trans 
pired  in  a  region  of  the  world  so  far  removed  from 
that  inhabited  by  the  more  progressive  nations  of 
modern  times,  that  our  knowledge  of  what  happened 


INTRODUCTORY  xiii 

there,  apart  from  the  scanty  information  found  in 
the  Scripture  narratives  and  from  fragmentary  re 
ferences  in  the  works  of  ancient  writers,  is  of  the 
most  meagre  character. 

Fortunately  the  historical  researches  of  Pro 
fessor  Heeren,  published  in  1828,  and  later  those 
of  Mr.  George  Rawlinson,  published  in  1878,  brought 
the  major  portion  of  this  miscellaneous  information 
within  reach  of  the  investigator.  It  is  true  that 
much  of  Professor  Heeren's  research  has,  by  reason 
of  the  progress  of  later  historical  discoveries,  be 
come  antiquated,  still  the  essential  facts  have  not 
been  materially  altered,  the  section  relating  to  the 
commerce  of  the  Phoenicians  especially,  as  Mr. 
Rawlinson  says,  not  having  been  superseded  even 
now  by  any  later  writer. 

Of  Mr.  Rawlinson 's  own  work  it  is  unnecessary 
to  speak.  As  a  guide  to  the  student  in  thorough 
systematic  study  of  ancient  history  his  manner 
has  no  equal  in  the  English  language,  nor  does  any 
name  carry  more  weight  in  matters  relating  to 
Phoenicia  and  the  Phoenicians  than  his  does. 

The  very  limited  character  of  this  research  com 
pared  with  the  immense  scope  of  the  subject  of 
which  it  treats  necessarily  precludes  the  possibility 
of  the  presentation  of  that  circumstantial  state 
ment  of  events  on  which  the  value  of  a  regular 
history  depends.  Still,  in  view  of  the  tremendous 
lapse  of  time  since  these  events  occurred,  the  paucity 
of  information  with  respect  to  the  Southern  Arabian 
or  Ophir  trade  and  the  consequent  impossibility  of 
creating  more  than  a  mosaic  of  the  historic  frag 
ments  that  are  at  present  available,  I  may  on  that 
account  be  permitted  the  liberty  of  treating  the 


xiv     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

subject  in  such  a  way  as  will  enable  me  to  present 
the  facts  in  my  possession  most  effectively. 

In  the  construction  of  the  work  I  have  been 
more  concerned  with  the  continuous  chain  of  events 
than  with  mere  lines  of  chronological  demarcation, 
still  the  divisions  under  which  I  have  grouped  the 
various  sections  of  the  research  weave  themselves 
naturally  into  a  connected  and  inter-related  whole, 
which  in  its  entirety  throws  new,  and  I  believe 
valuable,  light  on  one  of  those  great  movements  of 
the  human  race  of  which  up  to  this  date  we  have 
possessed  very  unsatisfactory  information.  The 
following  of  this  plan  is  the  more  excusable  since, 
in  addition  to  this,  it  affords  a  convenient  way  of 
approach  to  at  least  the  boundaries  of  our  inquiry. 

In  some  cases  it  has  been  impossible  to  fix  dates 
accurately,  but  I  believe  there  is  sufficient  prob 
ability  in  those  given  to  warrant  their  acceptance. 

While  prosecuting  the  final  stages  of  the  research 
it  became  apparent  that  it  would  be  necessary  to 
outline  a  much  more  comprehensive  history  than 
was  at  first  designed.  In  order  to  do  this,  and  at 
the  same  time  keep  the  work  within  reasonable 
limits,  it  has  been  necessary  in  some  portions  to  be 
more  concise  than  prudence  under  more  favour 
able  conditions  would  have  dictated.  It  is  possible, 
therefore,  that  the  work  as  a  whole  may  not  be 
invulnerable  to  criticism.  Still,  even  if  in  some  in 
stances  it  is  found  that  errors  have  crept  into  the 
research,  it  is  more  than  probable  that  on  careful 
scrutiny  these  will  not  be  found  to  be  of  a  nature 
to  render  less  conclusive  the  results  to  which  it 
points. 

The  first  chapter  refers  to  a  period  of  which  at 


INTRODUCTORY  xv 

present  we  have  no  continuous  record  available  for 
the  purposes  of  our  research.  It  has  been  necessary, 
therefore,  to  construct  one  out  of  such  data  as  exists, 
and  in  view  of  the  authorities  supporting  it  I  be 
lieve  it  will  not  be  considered  without  value.  When 
woven  into  connected  form  it  provides  a  perspec 
tive  that  makes  one  phase  of  our  inquiry,  and  also 
the  later  developments  of  the  career  and  history  of 
the  Phoenicians,  understandable. 

In  the  second  and  third  chapters  we  are  on 
much  surer  ground.  Consequently  all  that  was 
necessary  was  to  arrange  and  group  these  essential 
and  well-ascertained  facts  bearing  on  the  objects 
of  our  research. 

Such  a  course,  however,  was  not  possible  in  the 
chapters  on  Navigation  and  the  Compass,  and  in 
order  to  arrive  at  a  clear  understanding  of  facts 
bearing  on  these  two  phases  of  the  problem,  it  has 
been  necessary  to  deal  somewhat  drastically  with 
many  ancient  and  popularly  accepted  theories  that 
have  no  basis  in  fact,  and  to  reconstruct  them  on 
lines  suggested  by  later  and  more  reliable  data. 

It  is  unnecessary  to  offer  any  explanation  for 
the  selection  of  the  authorities  on  whom  I  have 
relied  for  information  with  regard  to  the  state  of 
native  society  in  the  insular  Pacific  when  it  was 
first  visited  by  Europeans.  It  is  quite  certain  that 
it  could  not  have  been  drawn  from  any  more  care 
ful,  painstaking,  and  reliable  source  than  that  pro 
vided  by  Dr.  George  Turner  and  Mr.  William  Ellis, 
both  of  whom  had  a  long  and  continuous  residence 
there  before  any  modifying  influence  was  at  work 
among  the  native  population. 

The  great  obstacle  in  the  way  of  an  acceptable 

b 


xvi     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

solution  of  the  Aztec  problem  has  been  the  attempt 
to  explain  it  by  means  of  expeditions  starting  from 
some  Mediterranean  base.  Any  attempt  to  obtain 
a  solution  of  the  enigma  on  these  lines  is  as  clearly 
out  of  the  question  as  an  attempt  to  create  corres 
pondences  between  the  civilisation  of  the  Aztec 
and  that  existing  in  Europe  in  A.D.  1500,  for  while 
these  civilisations  were  clearly  derived  from  the 
same  sources  they  had  in  course  of  evolution  been 
developing  along  lines  diametrically  opposed  to 
each  other,  that  of  the  Aztec  at  no  period  having 
passed  under  the  refining  influences  of  Christianity. 

To  understand  this  problem  correctly,  therefore, 
it  is  necessary  to  dismiss  from  the  mind  all  reference 
to  the  later  state  of  European  society  as  it  appeared 
after  the  introduction  of  Christianity.  It  must  be 
viewed  in  the  light  of  that  period  when  Jew,  Phoe 
nician,  Scythian,  and  Thracian  were  the  dominant 
factors  in  the  national  life  of  the  Eastern  Mediter 
ranean,  namely,  about  noo  B.C.  And  this  the 
more  so  that  both  the  Jewish  and  American  tradi 
tions  refer  in  the  clearest  manner  to  this  period  as 
that  in  which  these  movements,  that  alone  are 
capable  of  explaining  in  any  rational  manner  the 
origin  of  the  population  of  the  Pacific  Islands,  and 
at  least  the  central  portions  of  the  American 
Continent,  took  place. 

Moreover,  the  so-called  physical  difficulties  that 
have  bulked  so  largely  in  the  minds  of  all  investi 
gators  of  this  problem  are  found  to  melt  into  thin 
air.  This  will  be  made  very  clear  by  a  careful 
study  of  the  section  devoted  to  the  navigation  of 
the  ancients,  for  there  it  will  be  seen  that  a  con 
sensus  of  opinion  exists  among  competent  authorities, 


INTRODUCTORY  xvii 

not  least  of  whom  is  Lord  Avebury,  that  for  at  least 
from  two  to  five  hundred  years  before  the  date  of 
the  setting  out  of  these  expeditions  of  Solomon  and 
Hiram  from  Eziongeber,  which  brought  the  Pacific 
slopes  of  the  American  Continent  temporarily  within 
the  Phoenician  sphere  of  influence,  the  shores  of 
Britain  and  Norway  were  already  tributary  to  the 
trade  of  Tyre  and  Sidon.  Consequently  voyages 
across  the  Pacific  in  the  latitudes  of  the  steady 
trade  winds  must  have  been  an  easy  feat  to  a  people 
who  had  already  mastered  all  the  difficulties  that 
beset  the  dangerous  navigation  of  the  tempestuous 
and  storm-driven  coasts  of  Western  Europe. 

In  this  connection  it  has  been  necessary  to  re 
construct  the  history  of  the  compass,  which  was 
clearly  a  Phoenician  invention.  Fortunately,  the 
data  necessary  for  that  purpose  was  in  existence, 
and  I  believe  that,  presented  as  it  now  is,  all  future 
doubt  as  to  the  origin  of  this  invaluable  instrument 
will  be  set  at  rest. 

That  the  American  Continent  was  discovered 
by  the  Jews  and  Phoenicians  and  populated  by  them 
in  conjunction  with  the  Scythians  and  Thracians 
of  South  Eastern  Europe,  and  that  the  communi 
cation  so  established  between  the  Asiatic  and 
American  Continents  continued  throughout  a 
period  of  probably  300  years,  are  the  conclusions 
submitted  in  the  chapter  on  America. 

In  order  that  the  full  value  of  this  portion  of  the 
work  may  be  easily  comprehended  by  the  average 
reader,  this  chapter  has  been  supplemented  by  one 
containing  a  list  of  some  of  the  more  apparent 
correspondences  found  to  exist  between  the  people 
inhabiting  the  shores  of  the  Eastern  Mediterranean 


xviii    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

and  those  of  Central  America.  These,  it  will  be 
found,  are  of  such  a  nature  as  enable  us  to  recognise 
the  source  from  which  the  American  population 
sprang.  With  a  view,  however,  to  eliminating  any 
possibility  of  doubt,  I  have  thrown  the  total  results 
of  the  research  into  the  form  of  an  inductio  per 
enumerationem  simplicem,  to  which  is  appended  a 
list  of  authorities  on  which  it  is  based.  I  trust  this 
may  be  found  satisfying  not  merely  to  the  general 
reader  but  also  to  the  student  who  may  desire  a 
more  intimate  knowledge  of  the  whole  subject. 

THOMAS  C.  JOHNSTON. 


DID  THE  PHCENICIANS  DISCOVER 
AMERICA  ? 

CHAPTER    I 

THE   PHOENICIANS   IN   THE   MAKING 

Early  history — The  Hyksos  or  Shepherd  Kings — Their  rule  in  Egypt — 
In  Bahrein  Islands — Removal  from  Persian  Gulf  to  Mediterranean- 
— The  Hyksos  in  Palestine — Union  with  Phoenicians — Commercial 
and  manufacturing  prosperity — Some  results — Phoenician  route  to» 
Syria — Babylonian  and  Egyptian  influences — Evolution  of  the  Jew. 

THE  movements  of  that  people  which  history 
styles  Phoenician,  prior  to  their  settlement  on  the 
Syrian  sea-board,  is  a  subject  full  of  mysterious 
interest. 

The  most  reliable  authorities  describe  the  first 
of  these  as  interrelated  with  the  migrations  of 
successive  masses  of  population  which  moved  from 
the  mountainous  districts  of  Kurdistan,1  near  the 
sources  of  the  Tigris  and  Euphrates,  to  which  the 
Scripture  narrative  (Gen.  ii.  n)  assigns  the  cradle 
of  the  human  race,  to  the  Mesopotamian  low  lands, 
where  they  settled  and  in  course  of  time  split  up 
into  numerous  tribes  and  families. 

If  therefore  we  accept  this  view  it  will  be 
necessary  for  us  to  conceive  of  the  Phoenicians  at 
the  beginning  of  their  career  not  as  a  separate 
people,  but  as  an  integral  portion  of  the  Syrian 

1  Heeren,  Hist.  Res.,  vol.  i.  p.  292. 

A 


2       THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

tribes  known  as  "  tent  Arabs/'  who,  from  the  dawn 
of  history,  occupied  the  vast  plains  that  lay  be 
tween  the  Mediterranean  sea-board  and  the  river 
Tigris,  and  stretched  from  the  most  southerly  parts 
of  Arabia  to  the  Caucasian  mountains. 

That  great  authority  on  the  Semitic  race,  M. 
Ren  an,  speaks  of  the  Phoenicians  as  a  part  of  the 
first  wave  of  those  great  migratory  movements 
which,  proceeding  to  the  fertile  plains  of  the  lower 
Euphrates,  there  developed  a  civilisation  so  widely 
different  from  that  of  their  pastoral  brethren  as 
to  set  them  apart  at  the  beginning  of  their  career 
as  a  separate  and  a  peculiar  people. 

This  statement  is  supported  by  the  Phoenician 
account  of  themselves,  for  says  Herodotus  (vii.  89)  : 
"The  Phoenicians,  as  they  themselves  say,  anciently 
dwelt  on  the  Red  Sea,  and  having  crossed  from 
thence,  they  settled  on  the  sea  coasts  of  Syria/' 
If  we  are  careful  therefore  to  distinguish  between 
the  name  Red  Sea  in  its  ancient  and  modern  appli 
cation  there  should  be  no  difficulty  in  understand 
ing  the  case  as  it  is  now  presented.  Herodotus 
(i.  180)  explains  that  the  Red  Sea  anciently  meant 
"  that  sea  into  which  the  Euphrates,  a  river  broad, 
deep,  and  rapid,  flows/'  and  must  therefore  be 
identified  with  the  Persian  Gulf.  Strabo  gives 
still  further  light  on  the  subject,  for  he  writes  of 
two  islands  in  the  Persian  Gulf,  called  Tylus  and 
Arados,  in  which  remains  of  temples  and  other 
ruins  were  found,  bearing  all  the  peculiar  marks  of 
Phoenician  architecture.  The  similarity  of  these 
names  with  those  of  Tyre  and  Aradus,  two  of  the 
first  foundations  of  the  Phoenicians  on  the  Medi 
terranean  sea-board,  so  strikingly  supports  this 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING    3 

tradition  that  we  may  safely  enough  accept  it  as 
correct. 

These  early  settlers,  by  the  very  force  of  cir 
cumstances,  led  mainly  a  nomadic  life.  Only  in  a 
very  limited  sense  could  they  be  called  one  people. 
Probably  enough  in  the  manner  of  their  life  and  in 
the  nature  of  the  territory  they  occupied  they  had 
much  in  common,  but,  splitting  up  into  families 
and  tribes,  they  seldom  co-ordinated  unless  for 
some  specific  purpose  or  in  time  of  common  peril 
(Gen.  xiv.  13). 

It  is  thus  that  the  Scripture  narrative  presents 
these  populations  of  the  Syrian  plains  to  us.  This 
mode  of  life  was  not,  however,  without  its  advan 
tages  among  a  primitive  people,  for  it  made  them 
observant,  resourceful,  and  self-reliant,  and  fitted 
them  to  endure  the  hardships  of  these  early  ages 
when  men  required  to  wrest  their  support  from  re 
luctant  nature  by  a  constant  struggle  with  the 
elements.  It  also  enabled  them  without  prepara 
tion  to  undertake  such  campaigns  as  were  forced 
on  them  by  the  periodic  raids  of  the  mountain 
tribes. 

It  is  thus  we  must  understand  the  first  migratory 
movements  of  that  people  whom  later  were  desig 
nated  Phoenicians.  At  a  very  early  period  they 
separated  themselves  from  the  rude  pastoral  and 
migratory  tribes  who  occupied  the  lower  reaches 
of  the  Tigro-Euphrates  valley  and,  either  before 
or  with  the  main  body  of  the  Canaanites,  removed 
to  the  eastern  shores  of  the  Persian  Gulf  and  under 
took  on  their  own  account  what  has  been  described 
as  the  first  purely  mercantile  career. 

Near  the  forefront  of  this  movement  of  displace- 


4       THE    PHOENICIANS   AND   AMERICA 

ment  was  that  of  the  Hyksos  or  Shepherds,  a  name 
assumed  by  the  early  Chaldaean  princes,  which 
proves  the  primitive  pastoral  habits  of  the  people 
and  the  source  from  which  they  came  before  their 
settlement  in  the  Nile  valley  and  their  absorption 
by  its  civilisation. 

The  ethnographic  relation  of  the  Phoenician  to 
these  Hyksos  has  been  the  subject  of  much  dispute. 
In  Genesis  x.  15  Sidon  the  firstborn  of  Canaan  is 
classed  with  the  Hamites,  and  many  authorities 
still  plead  that  in  spite  of  their  purely  Semitic 
language  the  Phoenicians  were  a  distinct  race  both 
from  the  Hyksos  and  the  Hebrews.  The  opposite 
view,  however,  that  the  Hyksos,  Phoenicians,  and 
Canaanites  were  an  early  offshoot  from  the  Semitic 
stock,  receives  strong  support  from  the  fact  that 
the  language  of  the  Hebrews  was  very  similar  to 
that  of  the  Phoenicians.  Moreover,  it  is  the  only 
view  that  meets  all  the  necessities  of  the  case. 

The  story  of  the  Hyksos  invasion  of  Egypt 
told  by  Manetho,  the  Egyptian  historian,  and  pre 
served  in  a  fragment  by  Josephus  (Ag.  Ap.  i.  15), 
has  therefore,  as  forming  a  part  of  this  general 
movement  of  the  Semitic  population  from  the 
Syrian  plains,  a  peculiar  interest  in  connection  with 
our  inquiry. 

The  fragment  is  as  follows :  '  There  was  a 
King  of  ours  whose  name  was  Amintimaos.  Under 
him  it  came  to  pass,  I  know  not  how,  that  God  was 
averse  to  us,  and  there  came,  after  a  surprising 
manner,  men  of  ignoble  birth  out  of  the  eastern 
parts,  who  had  boldness  enough  to  make  an  ex 
pedition  into  our  country  and  with  ease  subdue  it 
by  force,  yet  without  hazarding  a  battle.  So  when 


THE    PHCENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING      5 

they  had  gotten  those  that  governed  us  under 
their  power,  they  afterward  burned  down  our  cities 
and  demolished  the  temples  of  the  gods  and  used 
all  the  inhabitants  after  a  most  barbarous  manner, 
nay  some  they  slew  and  led  their  children  and  wives 
into  slavery.  This  whole  nation  was  called  Hyksos, 
that  is  Shepherd  Kings,  for  in  the  sacred  language 
Hyk  signifies  King,  and  Sos  in  the  ordinary  dialect 
shepherd/1 

At  length  they  made  one  of  themselves  king 
whose  name  was  Saites  (in  some  versions  Salates). 
He  chiefly  aimed  at  securing  the  eastern  parts, 
fearing  that  the  Assyrians,  then  stronger  than  him 
self,  would  be  desirous  of  that  kingdom.  Saites 
was  succeeded  by  other  kings  who  with  their 
descendants  held  Egypt  for  511  years. 

After  this  the  Theban  kings  and  others  of  Egypt 
arose  against  the  Shepherd  rule,  and  a  great  and  long 
war  waged  until  Mispragmenthoses  drove  the  Shep 
herds  out  of  all  Egypt  except  Avaris.  Herodotus 
(ii.  28)  describes  these  Hyksos  invaders  as  enemies 
to  the  religion  of  Egypt,  who  destroyed  the  temples, 
broke  in  pieces  the  altars  and  images  of  the  gods, 
and  killed  the  sacred  animals  with  a  view  to  uproot 
ing  the  low  and  degrading  system  of  animal  worship 
which  prevailed  there. 

During  the  earlier  stages  of  the  occupancy,  when 
the  barbarities  referred  to  by  Manetho  and  Hero 
dotus  were  already  a  thing  of  the  past,  the  con 
querors,  succumbing  to  the  masterful  influences  of 
ancient  civilisation  by  which  they  were  surrounded, 
speedily  became  identified  with  the  country  and 
its  traditions,  and  in  place  of  attempting  to  create 
a  new  form  of  government  in  consonance  with  their 


6       THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

own  antecedents  and  usages,  made  a  careful  study 
of  the  institutions  of  the  new  territory  occupied 
by  them. 

Quickly  realising  how  much  easier  the  task  of 
completely  subjugating  the  native  population  would 
become  by  continuing  rather  than  destroying  the 
form  of  government  with  which  they  were  familiar, 
they  pursued  the  easy  and  peaceful  policy  of  assimi 
lating  themselves  with  the  institutions  of  the  con 
quered  peoples.  So  successfully  was  this  done  that 
in  recent  times  their  presence  in  Egypt  has  only 
been  detected  by  means  of  the  long  hair,  thick 
beard,  and  strongly-marked  Semitic  features  found 
on  some  of  the  contemporary  monuments. 

This  prudent  policy  seems  not  to  have  stopped 
here.  Realising  how  unfitted  they  were  by  reason 
of  their  previous  nomadic  life  for  the  management 
of  the  complicated  system  of  government  adopted 
by  the  native  rulers,  the  Hyksos  invaders  so  utilised 
the  skill  of  the  Egyptians  as  to  succeed,  without 
weakening  their  own  power,  in  making  them 
govern  themselves.  Those  officials,  who  were 
familiar  with  the  routine  of  office,  were  retained 
until  they  were  able  to  train  young  men  of  their 
own  race  who  should  be  capable  of  gradually  re 
placing  their  instructors. 

Pari  passu  with  these  general  movements,  the 
Court  with  its  pomp  and  magnificence  was  revived 
around  the  new  Pharaohs.  The  usual  retinue  of 
officials  were  installed,  taxes  were  levied  for  the 
support  of  the  government,  law  courts  were  given 
authority,  religion  was  protected,  and  their  own 
god  Set  or  Soutek  set  up  in  the  Pantheon.  Thus 
the  tide  of  Egyptian  life  swung  back,  without 


THE    PHCENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING      7 

friction,  into  its  accustomed  channels,  carrying  on 
its  broad  bosom  Hyksos  and  Egyptian  as  a  united 
people. 

From  a  remote  period  it  had  been  the  fixed 
policy  of  the  native  rulers  of  Egypt  not  to  welcome 
strangers.  Consequently  the  masses  of  population, 
displaced  by  the  inroads  of  the  mountaineers  into 
the  Syrian  plains,  who  sought  shelter  in  the  Nile 
valley,  were  treated  as  slaves,  or  at  least  as  a 
subject  people.  Under  the  new  administration, 
however,  this  ancient  policy  was  reversed,  with  the 
result  that  the  nomad  tribes  now  found  not  only 
a  home  but  employment  awaiting  them  in  Egypt. 

The  length  of  the  occupancy  of  Egypt  by  the 
Shepherds  has  been  the  subject  of  much  dispute, 
but,  according  to  the  best  authorities  (among 
whom  Maspero,  the  distinguished  Egyptologist,  to 
whom  I  am  much  indebted,  may  probably  be  ac 
cepted  as  representative),  the  period  is  said  to  have 
extended  from  2346  B.C.  to  1720  B.C.,  or  in  all  626 
years.  This  period  proved  of  unspeakable  ad 
vantage  to  both  Hyksos  and  Egyptian.  To  the 
Hyksos  it  afforded  an  opportunity  for  an  intimate 
acquaintance  with  the  best  forms  of  civic,  com 
mercial,  and  manufacturing  life,  and  it  gave  them 
that  training  in  science  and  art  which  is  an  integral 
portion  of  the  higher  forms  of  civilisation.  To 
the  Egyptians,  on  the  other  hand,  it  proved  not 
less  valuable.  The  influence  of  their  smooth-going 
civilisation  had  so  sapped  the  strength  of  the  nation 
that  the  invasion  of  the  Hyksos  is  said  not  even  to 
have  been  opposed.  But  a  change  for  the  better 
had  come  over  the  race.  The  native  princes,  who 
had  left  the  old  capital  at  Memphis  and  with  their 


8      THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

followers  retired  to  Thebes,  were  in  time  awakened 
from  their  fatal  inaction.  In  their  new  home  there 
rankled  in  their  breasts  memories  of  the  barbarities 
of  the  invasion  and  the  loss  of  the  invaluable  terri 
tory  over  which  they  and  their  fathers  had  for  so 
many  centuries  held  sway.  Without  assurance 
that  the  invaders  would  be  satisfied  with  the  fief- 
dom  to  which  they  had  made  them  subject,  they 
rallied  to  their  standard  the  princes  and  potentates 
of  the  south  country,  and,  uniting  their  forces, 
fortified  Thebes  and  made  it  impregnable. 

Time  ultimately  came  to  their  rescue  and  pro 
vided  both  cause  and  leader.  The  slumbering 
discontent  was  fanned  into  a  fierce  fire  of  rebellion 
by  the  reduction  of  lower  Egypt  to  a  tributary 
condition  to  the  Hyksos  Government.  This  re 
bellion,  headed  by  Ra-skeenan-taa,  seems  to  have 
had  only  a  limited  success,  but  on  the  accession  to 
the  throne  of  Pharaoh  Alisphrogmenthosis,  his 
successor,  the  native  population  at  last  found  a 
worthy  leader.  The  Hyksos  were  defeated  and 
driven  from  the  capital  at  Memphis  and  the  entire 
country  to  the  west  of  the  Delta,  and  shut  up  in  the 
immense  fortified  camp  at  Avaris. 

This  war  was  probably  in  some  particulars  the 
most  remarkable  in  Egyptian  annals.  It  dragged 
on  for  years  without  affording  the  besiegers  any 
hope  of  ultimate  success.  Ultimately  the  Hyksos 
were  compelled  to  offer  terms  of  capitulation.  In 
the  words  of  the  Egyptian  historian  Manetho,  they 
"  agreed  to  evacuate  the  fortress  on  condition  that 
they  should  be  permitted  to  leave  the  country, 
and,  by  virtue  of  this  agreement,  they  withdrew 
from  Egypt  with  all  their  families  and  possessions, 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING    9 

to  the  number  of  240,000  men,  and  traversed  the 
desert  into  Syria.  Fearing,  however,  the  power  of 
the  Assyrians,  who  were  at  that  time  masters  of 
Asia,  they  turned  into  Palestine  and  in  that  part 
which  is  now  called  Judaea  built  a  city  which  should 
be  sufficient  for  so  large  a  number  of  men,  and 
called  it  Jerusalem/'  This  exodus,  which  seems  to 
have  been  as  complete  as  the  later  one  of  the  Jews, 
is  believed  to  have  taken  place  in  1720  B.C. 

At  this  stage  it  should  be  pointed  out  that  the 
removal  of  the  Phoenicians  from  the  Persian  Gulf 
cannot  be  attributed  altogether  to  a  desire  on  their 
part  to  profit  by  the  advent  of  the  Hyksos  in  Pales 
tine,  for,  according  to  Herodotus  (ii.  44),  the  arrival 
of  the  first  emigrants  on  the  Syrian  sea-board  took 
place  2300  years  before  his  visit,  which  would  place 
the  date  of  their  arrival  at  about  2800  B.C.  They 
must  therefore  have  been  settled  in  Syria  at  least  a 
thousand  years  before  the  exodus  of  the  Hyksos 
took  place. 

While  the  national  life  of  Egypt  had  been  pass 
ing  through  the  long  period  of  unrest  and  transition 
caused  by  the  invasion,  occupancy,  and  expulsion 
of  the  Hyksos,  that  branch  of  the  Syrian  nomads 
who  first  separated  themselves  from  the  common 
stock  and  settled  on  the  lower  reaches  of  the 
Euphrates  had  not  remained  inactive.  They  had 
developed  a  civilisation  which  constituted  a  distinct 
departure  from  the  simple  life  and  manners  of  their 
pastoral  brethren. 

Monument  and  tradition  alike  show  that  from 
the  most  ancient  times  the  Canaanites  were  forced 
by  these  early  inroads  of  the  mountain  tribes,  or  by 
the  conflicting  interests  in  Mesopotamia,  to  migrate 


io     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

from  the  banks  of  the  Euphrates  to  the  western 
shores  of  the  Persian  Gulf.  Those  situated  nearest 
to  Chaldaea  and  the  sea  appear  to  have  first  dis 
carded  the  nomadic  life  and  engaged  in  cultivatin 
the  soil  in  industrial  pursuits  and  commerce,  or  in 
the  construction  of  the  first  ships  that  sailed  the 
seas. 

A  successful  commercial  career  imposed  three 
conditions  on  these  primitive  traders.  The  first 
was  the  accumulation  at  some  central  emporium 
of  stores  of  such  merchandise  as  would  find  a  ready 
sale  in  available  markets.  Secondly,  the  selection 
of  some  suitable  centre  from  which  they  could 
operate  successfully  between  the  markets  of  supply 
and  demand,  and  thirdly,  the  selection  of  such  a 
position  as  would  afford  security  for  these  emporiums 
and  the  primitive  craft  by  which  the  transportation 
was  accomplished.  This  security  was  necessary  to 
prevent  attack  from  the  predatory  nomadic  tribes 
which  infested  the  country  and  found  in  these  early 
rich  centres  of  civilisation  the  booty  for  which  they 
were  constantly  on  the  outlook. 

It  is  more  than  probable  that  it  was  out  of  the 
stress  imposed  by  compliance  with  these  conditions, 
rather  than  any  mere  predilection  for  the  sea,  that 
the  custom  arose  (always  a  marked  feature  of  the 
Phoenician  policy)  of  selecting  for  emporiums, 
wherever  possible,  islands  situated  at  a  short  dis 
tance  from  the  mainland,  as  at  the  Bahrein  Islands, 
Sidon,  Tyre,  Gades,  and  other  points.  The  causes 
which  led  to  transference  of  the  establishments  of 
the  Phoenicians  from  the  lower  waters  of  the 
Euphrates  to  the  Bahrein  Islands  are  not  recorded 
by  history,  yet  we  have  no  difficulty  in  recognising 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING     n 

them.  In  becoming  the  trade  intermediaries  be 
tween  the  settled  portions  of  eastern  and  southern 
Arabia  and  the  populous  and  cultivated  centres  of 
trade  in  the  Tigro-Euphrates  valley,  it  was  neces 
sary  to  accumulate  vast  stores  of  Arabian  and 
Babylonian  wares  at  some  point  midway  between 
these  two  widely  separated  regions.  At  the  same 
time  these  emporiums  would  enable  them  to  avail 
themselves  of  those  manufactured  wares  of  the  Nile 
which  were  always  in  active  demand  in  the  great 
centres  of  population.  In  view  of  these  circum 
stances,  no  more  suitable  place  could  have  been 
chosen  than  the  Bahrein  Islands.  Gerrha,  from 
which  the  bay  where  the  Bahrein  Islands  are  situ 
ated  took  its  name,  was  famous  in  antiquity  as  one 
of  the  richest  cities  in  the  world  in  consequence  of  it 
being  the  centre  from  which  radiated  the  great 
caravan  routes.  It  was  also  renowned  for  its  pearl 
fishing,  of  which  more  anon. 

The  principal  authorities  on  whom  it  is  necessary 
to  rely  for  information  with  respect  to  the  Phoe 
nician  settlements  on  the  Bahrein  Islands  are  Pliny 
and  Strabo.  "  On  sailing  south  from  Gerrha,"  says 
Strabo,  "  we  come  to  two  islands,  where  are  to  be 
seen  Phoenician  temples,  and  the  inhabitants  assure 
us  that  the  cities  of  Phoenicia  bearing  the  same  name 
are  colonies  from  them.  These  islands  are  two  days' 
sail  from  Tenedon  at  the  mouth  of  the  Euphrates, 
and  one  from  Cape  Makai."  This  account  is  supple 
mented  by  the  more  specific  reference  of  Pliny, 
"  for  Tylos,"  says  he,  "  is  situated  fifty  miles  from 
the  Bay  of  Gerrha.1'  As  these  statements  agree 
entirely  with  the  position  of  the  islands  in  the  Bay 
of  Lachsa  in  the  present  day,  there  can  be  no  question 


12       THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

that  they  are  those  referred  to,  so  that  if  we  conjoin 
these  statements  with  those  of  Ezekiel  xxvii.  20  and 
Genesis  xxv.  3,  in  which  Dedan  is  spoken  of,  which 
was  intended  to  be  understood  either  as  one  of  the 
Bahrein  Islands  or  the  more  northerly  one  of  Cathana, 
we  will  probably  have  before  us  all  that  is  necessary 
to  a  clear  understanding  of  any  future  reference 
we  may  make  to  Tylos,  Arados,  or  Dedan,  since  all 
of  these  were  situated  in  the  Bay  of  Gerrha  and 
adjacent  to  the  city  of  that  name. 

That  the  Babylonians  at  a  later  period  possessed 
a  maritime  communication  with  these  islands 
through  the  Chaldaeans  seems  to  be  the  purpose  of 
the  statement  of  Isaiah  xliii.  14,  and  also  of  ^Eschylus, 
where  the  sending  of  ships  and  the  receiving  of 
Arabian  and  Indian  produce,  presumably  through 
this  channel  of  trade,  is  spoken  of.  This  also  appears 
from  the  works  of  older  writers,  who  refer  to  the 
wealth  of  Gerrha  as  the  direct  result  of  its  being 
the  centre  of  the  Indo-Arabian,  Babylonian  trade 
which  in  those  days  was  the  most  important,  since 
the  province  of  Oman  or  Arabia  Felix,  the  native 
country  of  frankincense  and  other  valuable  perfumes 
in  great  demand  for  religious  purposes,  was  in  its 
immediate  vicinity. 

In  addition,  however,  to  these  islands  being 
the  distributing  centre  for  Indian  and  Arabian  pro 
duce,  we  are  assured  by  Theophrastus,  in  his  History 
oj  Plants  (iv.  9),  that  the  island  of  Tylos  was  occupied 
by  large  plantations  of  cotton,  from  which  were 
manufactured  cloths  called  Sindones,  these  being 
mainly  exported  to  Arabia  and  India.  It  is  true 
Herodotus  (iii.  106)  claims  that  India  was  the  native 
soil  of  this  plant,  but,  if  so,  its  spread  to  the  Bahrein 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING     13 

Islands,  Arabia,  and  Egypt  could  only  have  been 
through  Phoenician  channels,  for  at  a  very  early  date 
it  formed  a  considerable  branch  of  ancient  commerce. 
Curiously  enough  we  can  trace  its  progress  from 
this  point  through  the  Pacific  Islands  to  America, 
where,  we  shall  see  later,  its  presence  is  distinctly 
attributed  to  the  culture  hero  Tuetsalcoatl,  who  is 
said  to  have  brought  maize  and  cotton  into  Mexico 
(Ency.  Brit.,  xvi.  208)  on  his  first  arrival. 

Valuable,  however,  as  pearls  and  cotton  were  to 
the  early  settlers  on  the  Bahrein  Islands,  there  was 
one  product  found  there  of  infinitely  more  value 
to  the  Phoenicians  than  either  of  these,  one  indeed 
that  had  more  to  do  with  the  fashioning  of  their 
future  career.  If  the  Bahrein  Islands  had  not  af 
forded  an  abundant  supply  of  timber,  the  naviga 
tion  of  the  Persian  Gulf  and  even  that  of  the 
Mediterranean  might  have  been  delayed  for  cen 
turies,  and  the  genius  of  the  Phoenicians  diverted 
into  other  channels.  From  such  information  as 
may  be  gathered  from  Pliny  and  other  sources, 
there  was  found  in  these  islands  a  timber  similar 
to  the  Indian  teak  wood,  which  was  reputed  to  be 
capable  of  resisting  putrefaction  while  under  water 
for  upward  of  two  hundred  years,  although  decaying 
much  sooner  when  exposed  to  the  atmosphere. 

Among  the  commodities  which  formed  the 
staple  of  exchange  at  the  Bahrein  Islands  were  the 
ivory,  ebony,  and  cotton  of  India,  the  spices,  cin 
namon,  and  pearls  of  Ceylon,  and  the  cotton  and 
pearls  of  the  Persian  Gulf.  In  addition  to  these 
were  the  entire  products  of  the  Arabian  peninsula 
and  the  coasts  of  Ethiopia  adjoining,  which  found 
their  natural  outlet  in  the  great  central  markets  of 


14     THE    PHOENICIANS   AND    AMERICA 

Yemen.  It  will  be  evident,  therefore,  that  the 
entire  region  bordering  on  the  Persian  Gulf,  with 
the  coasts  of  India,  Ceylon,  and  Southern  Arabia, 
were  familiar  to  the  Phoenicians  as  to  no  other 
nation  of  antiquity,  and  that  during  the  earlier 
portion  of  their  career  especially,  they  must  have 
been  without  a  competitor  in  the  navigation  of 
these  seas,  as  was  the  case  in  their  navigation  of  the 
Mediterranean  later. 

We  have  no  positive  historic  information  that 
would  enable  us  to  determine  the  exact  spot  to  which 
the  Phoenicians  directed  their  expeditions  in  the  Red 
Sea.  It  is,  however,  known  that  at  a  later  date 
they  were  accustomed  to  fit  ships  from  the  western 
bay  of  the  Arabian  Gulf,  the  present  Suez,  and  the 
Hierapolis  of  antiquity.  Unfortunately  we  have 
no  satisfactory  information  with  respect  to  the 
date  at  which  this  trade  was  inaugurated.  But 
it  was  certainly  very  ancient,  reaching  back  to  a 
date  long  anterior  to  that  of  the  expeditions  of 
Solomon  and  Hiram. 

As  to  the  causes  which  led  to  the  transference  of 
the  main  establishments  of  the  Phoenicians  to  the 
Mediterranean,  we  are  equally  at  a  loss  for  positive 
historic  testimony.  The  mere  fact,  however,  that 
their  first  settlement  there  was  Sidon  (Gen.  x.  15-19) 
"  the  fish  town/'  and  that  their  whole  career  on  the 
inland  sea  was  beyond  all  things  else  identified 
with  fishing  for  the  murex,  which  provided  the 
material  from  which  their  famous  dye  was  obtained, 
suggests  the  cause  so  plainly  that  it  seems  useless  to 
seek  for  another. 

It  is  more  than  probable  that  the  strategic 
position  of  the  emporiums  of  the  Phoenicians  at 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING     15 

Tylos  and  Arados,  which  enabled  them  in  large 
measure  to  control  the  commerce  of  the  ancient 
world,  may  have  developed  a  spirit  of  animosity  in 
the  great  commercial  centres  of  Babylonia  and 
South  Arabia,  which  it  was  always  the  policy  of 
the  Phoenicians  to  avoid.  This  may  have  acted  as 
a  stimulus  to  a  general  movement  towards  the 
Mediterranean.  Beyond  this  presumption,  how 
ever,  there  is  no  evidence  to  show  that  any  exodus 
of  a  startling  nature  ever  took  place  from  the 
Persian  Gulf.  On  the  contrary,  everything  indi 
cates  that  the  movement,  however  caused,  was 
slow  and  gradual,  probably  covering  some  centuries 
and  the  legitimate  outgrowth  of  commercial  oppor 
tunities  developing  in  the  West.  Be  that  as  it 
may,  from  the  new  site  the  Phoenicians  were  in  a 
position  to  control  the  entire  trade  of  the  West. 
The  entire  Mediterranean  sea-board  was  rapidly 
being  covered  by  markets  capable  of  absorbing  all 
that  was  produced  by  the  infant  industries  of  the 
Phoenicians. 

But  while  it  is  true  that  the  possibilities  of  the 
Bahrein  Islands  as  a  connecting  link  between  the 
Arabian  and  Babylonian  markets,  and  the  security 
which  they  afforded  for  their  emporiums  and  ship 
ping,  may  have  led  the  Phoenicians  to  make  their 
first  settlements  there,  it  is  equally  important  to 
remember  that  from  this  point  they  could  handle 
the  transport  trade  between  Arabia  and  Babylonia 
by  sea  at  a  fraction  of  the  expense  entailed  by  cara 
vans.  From  this  point,  too,  they  were  well  placed 
with  regard  to  the  Indian  peninsula,  Ceylon,  and 
Egypt,  whether  by  sea  via  some  central  port  in 
Hydramaut  or  Yemen,  or  by  way  of  Gerrha  and 


16     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Aelana   to   Thebes,    and  later   Memphis,   the   first 
capital  of  the  Hyksos. 

What  the  extent  of  the  marine  and  caravan 
trade  of  the  early  Phoenicians  was  during  their 
residence  on  the  Bahrein  Islands  we  have  no  means 
of  determining  by  direct  testimony.  That  these 
people  were  intimately  acquainted  with  the  Arabian 
peninsula  and  its  markets  and  products  has  already 
been  shown.  There  seems  little  room  for  doubt 
that  the  caravan  trade,  which  was  hardly  less  im 
portant  than  the  sea  trade,  was  either  directly  in 
the  Phoenicians1  hands  or,  through  the  instru 
mentality  of  the  carrying  tribes,  had  been  by  them 
exploited  to  such  an  extent  as  to  make  it  the  object 
of  the  cupidity  of  the  Assyrian  monarchs.  This 
view,  moreover,  is  strongly  supported  by  the  fact 
that  all  the  great  caravan  routes  which,  so  far  as 
we  know,  have  undergone  no  change  since  they 
were  first  established,  found  their  outlet  at  the 
Bay  of  Gerrha  in  the  immediate  neighbourhood 
of  the  Phoenician  establishments.  There  the  gold, 
precious  stones,  pearls,  and  frankincense  of  Arabia, 
the  pearls  and  cinnamon  of  Ceylon,  and  the  ivory, 
fine  woods,  spices,  and  cotton  of  India  could  be 
exchanged  for  the  manufactured  products  of  Baby 
lonia  and  Egypt  more  conveniently  than  at  any 
other  point. 

With  the  close  of  the  revolutions  in  Egypt  the 
seat  of  the  Phoenician  trade  seems  to  have  been 
changed.  Thebes  no  longer  remained  the  chief  mart, 
but  the  later  capital  Memphis,  from  which  the  pro 
ducts  of  the  African  and  Egyptian  markets  could  be 
more  conveniently  exchanged  for  those  of  Arabia 
and  Babylonia.  The  possession  of  large  central 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING     17 

warehouses  there,  where  an  assortment  of  these 
goods  could  be  obtained  in  such  quantities  as  suited 
the  local  markets,  necessarily  proved  a  great  con 
venience  to  the  Egyptian  merchants,  who  could 
have  found  very  little  in  the  situation  to  induce 
competition  with  a  people  who  either  owned,  or 
were  in  a  position  to  control,  the  trade  of  the 
Arabian  Peninsula.  The  country  was  then  infested 
by  rude  predatory  tribes,  who  were  a  menace  to  life 
and  property,  and  made  private  operations  im 
possible,  so  that  the  carrying  trade  could  only  be 
conducted  either  by  sea  or  by  large  armed  caravans 
strong  enough  to  combat  successfully  the  Nomad 
tribesmen. 

It  is  not  less  difficult  to  arrive  at  a  definite 
understanding  with  respect  to  the  exact  stage  to 
which  the  allied  arts  of  naval  construction  and 
navigation  had  reached  in  the  hands  of  the  Phoe 
nicians  previous  to  their  removal  from  the  Bahrein 
Islands  to  the  Mediterranean.  We  can  only  piece 
together  the  few  fragments  that  have  survived  the 
wrecks  of  time.  Happily  many  of  these  fragmentary 
references  are  often  illuminative,  and  when  thrown 
into  relief  against  the  black  background  of  an 
tiquity,  provide  all  that  is  really  necessary  to  a 
complete  understanding  of  the  case.  Especially  is 
this  so  with  respect  to  the  few  introductory  remarks 
of  Herodotus  (i.  i)  in  his  volume  of  research  into 
the  state  of  ancient  society.  There  he  writes : 
"  The  Phoenicians  having  settled  in  the  country 
which  they  now  inhabit,  forthwith  applied  them 
selves  to  distant  voyages,  and  having  exported 
Egyptian  and  Assyrian  wares,  touched  at  other 
places  and  at  Argos,  which  at  that  period  in  every 

B 


i8     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

respect  surpassed  all  those  stated  which  are  now 
comprehended  under  the  general  name  of  Greece/' 
When  we  connect  this  with  another  passage  from 
the  same  author  (ii.  44),  we  find  that  these  voyages 
must  be  referred  to  a  date  anterior  to  2800  B.C. 
These  facts  are  extremely  valuable,  for  they  enable 
us  to  know  by  direct  testimony  something  of  the 
nature,  extent,  and  direction  of  Phoenician  trade 
during  their  residence  on  the  Bahrein  Islands,  and 
from  this  to  conclude  that  the  arts  of  naval  con 
struction  and  navigation  were  at  that  period  in  no 
such  primitive  a  condition  as  is  usually  ascribed 
to  them. 

The  navigation  of  the  Mediterranean  was  by  no 
means  as  simple  as  that  of  the  Persian  Gulf.  The 
eastern  end  especially  was  subject  to  storms  of  such 
a  character  as  struck  terror  in  the  heart  of  the  boldest 
navigator  of  those  days.  Voyages,  therefore,  cover 
ing  a  distance  of  from  1500  to  2000  miles  implied 
an  advanced  state  of  naval  construction  and 
seamanship. 

While,  then,  we  are  not  in  possession  of  a  com 
prehensive  statement  with  respect  to  the  causes 
which  led  to  the  transference  of  the  main  estab 
lishments  of  the  Phoenicians  from  the  Persian  Gulf 
to  the  Mediterranean,  we  seem,  in  view  of  the  testi 
mony  already  adduced,  to  be  forced  to  the  con 
clusion  that  in  the  name  Sidon — the  fish  town — 
we  have  an  explanation  that  fits  all  the  necessities 
of  the  case.  The  "  fish  town  "  seems  to  afford  a 
sane  and  reasonable  explanation  of  the  movement 
from  the  Bahrein  Islands  to  the  Syrian  coasts,  and 
not  only  for  the  presence  of  the  Phoenicians  there, 
but  also  in  Sicily  and  Spain  and  even  in  the  Atlantic, 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE   MAKING     19 

so  far  at  least  as  Madeira  or  the  Purple  Isles  and  the 
coasts  of  Britain  are  concerned,  for  all  these  points 
seem  in  the  first  instance  to  have  been  identified 
with  the  murex  fishing. 

It  is  also  highly  probable  that  in  the  expulsion 
of  the  Hyksos  from  Egypt,  the  commercial  relations 
of  the  Phoenicians  with  the  Egyptians  received  a 
considerable  impetus.  The  re-occupation  of  lower 
Egypt  and  the  Delta  by  the  Egyptians  would 
naturally  create  a  very  active  demand  for  those 
foreign  commodities  which  they  had  been 
accustomed  to  receive  from  this  source.  From 
the  harbours  of  Tyre  and  Sidon,  the  Nile  and 
the  towns  that  lined  its  banks  could  be  reached 
in  a  tithe  of  the  time  and  at  a  fraction  of  the 
expense  entailed  by  the  long  and  perilous  land 
journey. 

The  general  state  of  unrest,  which  the  conflict 
between  the  Hyksos  and  Egyptians  must  have 
created  throughout  all  Syria,  may  likewise  have 
been  a  factor  of  no  small  importance  in  determining 
a  change  to  a  position  of  greater  security  for  the 
Phoenician  emporiums.  Moreover,  the  advantage 
secured  to  the  Phoenicians  by  the  central  position 
their  new  emporiums  occupied  with  respect  to  the 
markets  of  Babylonia,  Arabia,  Palestine,  and  Egypt, 
and  the  coasts  and  islands  of  Asia  Minor  where  the 
great  masses  of  population  were  at  that  time  situ 
ated,  was  too  obvious  to  have  been  overlooked  by 
a  people  whose  career  was  even  then  definitely 
marked  out  for  them.  By  this  time  they  had  over 
come  all  the  initial  difficulties  of  naval  construction 
and  seamanship,  and  were  in  a  position  independ 
ently  of  any  outside  assistance  to  construct  and 


20     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

navigate  such  vessels  as  the  new  situation  may 
have  demanded. 

Again,  the  advent  of  the  Hyksos  in  Palestine 
offered  a  magnificent  field  for  further  commercial 
expansion,  and  this  on  the  most  favourable  terms. 
The  transference  of  the  main  establishments  of  the 
Phoenicians  to  the  Syrian  coasts  was  not  less  ad 
vantageous  in  view  of  the  fact  that  they  were  an 
agricultural  people ;  here  they  were  close  to  both 
Palestine  and  Egypt,  the  granaries  of  the  ancient 
world,  and  their  vessels  and  caravans  were  able  to 
bring  back  on  their  return  journeys  an  abundant 
supply  of  such  food-stuffs  as  their  densely  popu 
lated  towns  needed.  In  so  doing  they  made  doubly 
certain  of  an  established  trade. 

The  Hyksos,  who  had  just  then  left  Egypt, 
were,  moreover,  a  very  different  people  from  the 
rude  barbarians  who  entered  the  Nile  valley  626 
years  before.  The  leavening  influences  of  the 
civilisation  of  the  Delta  had  effected  a  marvellous 
transformation.  The  Hyksos,  during  that  long 
period,  had  not  been  simply  identified  with 
Egyptian  institutions,  they  had  been  Egypt  itself. 
Now  they  brought  to  the  door  of  the  Phoenicians 
those  markets  which,  in  previous  years,  it  had  been 
necessary  for  the  traders  of  the  Bahrein  Islands  to 
cross  practically  a  thousand  miles  of  inhospitable 
desert  to  reach. 

The  new  career  of  the  Hyksos  was  to  be  one  of 
more  importance  to  mankind  than  the  conquest  of 
the  Nile,  one  in  which  they  would  live  over  again 
not  merely  the  life  of  Egypt,  but  a  new  and  larger 
life  of  their  own,  one  in  which  would  be  found  con 
joined  the  best  that  the  civilisation  of  Babylon  and 


THE   PHOENICIANS    IN    THE   MAKING    21 

Egypt  had  produced,  yet  one  not  less  peculiarly 
their  own.  Probably  this  new  life  in  its  details 
might  not  be  so  refined  as  the  original,  but  it  was 
a  strong,  healthy,  and  vigorous  life,  and,  beyond 
doubt,  more  practical  and  catholic  in  its  sym 
pathies  and  more  likely  to  appeal  to  men  as  they 
went  to  the  uttermost  parts  of  the  earth,  the 
missionaries  of  that  material  civilisation  that  would 
probably  affect  for  good  and  evil  every  kindred  and 
tribe  and  people  who  came  within  the  scope  of  its 
influence. 

That  in  the  final  adjustments  of  this  exodus 
from  Egypt  the  herdsman  would  care  for  his  cattle, 
the  husbandman  for  his  farm  in  the  well-watered 
valleys  and  plains  of  Jordan  and  Sharon,  and  the 
tradesmen  and  scientist  drift  to  Phoenicia,  so 
favourably  situated  only  150  miles  to  the  north, 
who  can  doubt  that  has  studied  the  migration  of 
mankind  ?  At  the  time  of  their  arrival  Tyre, 
Sidon,  Arados,  and  probably  others  in  that  long 
series  of  towns  which,  like  links  in  a  chain,  bound 
together  in  later  years  the  commonwealth  on  the 
Syrian  coast,  had  probably  for  centuries  been  busy 
centres  of  commercial,  if  not  of  manufacturing, 
activity.  With  the  existence  of  these  the  Hyksos 
could  not  fail  to  have  been  familiar,  since  their  pro 
ducts  must  often  have  excited  the  admiration  of  the 
herdsmen,  who  naturally  would  prefer  the  wares 
manufactured  or  to  be  purchased  in  the  Syrian 
coast  towns  to  those  produced  in  Babylon  from 
which  they  had  been  driven. 

The  Phoenicians  likewise  would  naturally  wel 
come  to  their  cities  men  of  their  own  race  who  were 
skilled  in  science,  art,  and  manufacture,  for  through 


22     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

the  active  co-operation  of  these  native  craftsmen 
they  would  be  enabled  to  strengthen  their  hold  on 
the  Egyptian  markets.  It  is  more  than  probable, 
therefore,  that  it  is  to  the  amalgamation  of  these 
two  branches  of  the  common  stock  rather  than  to 
any  other  cause  that  we  must  ascribe  the  pro 
nouncedly  Egyptian  and  Babylonian  influence 
found  in  the  motives  of  Phoenician  decorative 
designs. 

It  is  scarcely  surprising,  then,  that  in  those  two 
great  movements  of  what,  for  convenience  sake, 
may  be  called  the  Phoenicians  from  the  Persian 
Gulf,  and  those  from  Egypt,  we  find  the  natural 
culmination  of  those  segregations  of  what  were  at 
one  time  portions  of  the  nomadic  tribes  who  issued 
originally  from  the  mountain  regions  of  Kurdistan. 

Prior  to  this  amalgamation  the  population  of 
the  coast  towns  must  have  been  small  and  their 
capital  trifling,  but  with  the  advent  of  the  Hyksos 
in  Palestine  not  only  their  numbers  but  their 
capital  must  have  been  greatly  augmented.  It  is 
therefore  easy  to  conceive  of  this  period  as  striking 
the  keynote  of  a  forward  movement  in  the  history 
of  humanity  of  no  ordinary  kind. 

The  Phoenicians  of  the  Persian  Gulf,  with  a 
masterfulness  that  has  perhaps  no  counterpart  in 
the  history  of  mankind,  wrested  from  nature  secrets 
that  enabled  them  to  achieve  rare  distinction  in 
science,  art,  and  manufacture.  They  were  without 
a  serious  competitor  in  the  early  world  of  commerce 
and  transportation.  To  this  distinction  they  added 
the  creation  of  navigation,  the  discovery  of  the 
unique  qualities  of  the  murex  for  dyeing  purposes, 
and  the  manufacture  of  glass  from  the  fine  sands 


THE    PHCENIC1ANS    IN    THE    MAKING    23 

of  the  river  Belus.  Now  they  were  joined  by 
that  other  branch  of  themselves,  the  Hyksos,  who 
had  mastered  Egypt  and  were  skilled  to  weave,  not 
only  woollen  but  linen  fabrics,  to  design,  to  hew  stone, 
to  erect  pyramids  and  temples,  to  make  pottery,  to 
engrave  gems.  They  had  also  a  knowledge  of  the 
alphabet  and  of  the  exact  and  applied  sciences. 
All  this  enabled  the  Phoenicians  in  coming  years  to 
outrival  either  Egypt  or  Babylon.  Well  may  we 
ask  what  career  was  impossible  to  such  a  people  ? 
It  is  extremely  probable  that  about  this  period  a 
rupture  took  place  in  the  commercial  relations  of 
Phoenicia  and  Egypt.  Under  new  conditions  there 
was,  however,  no  reason  why  in  the  amalgamation 
of  the  Hyksos  with  the  business  men  of  Tyre  and 
Sidon,  Egypt  should  not  again  become  a  market  of 
the  first  importance  to  the  Syrian  coast  towns,  for 
the  Nile  was  convenient  to  the  Phoenician  ports, 
and  transportation  by  sea  was  both  rapid  and  cheap. 
Besides,  the  Phoenician  emporiums  were  stored  not 
only  with  their  own  manufactured  wares,  but  with 
the  varied  products  of  the  Babylonian  and  Arabian 
markets. 

In  the  world's  history  it  has  been  no  unusual 
thing  to  find  that  out  of  the  ashes  of  conflict  has 
arisen  to  friend  and  foe  alike  a  harvest  of  better 
things  than  seemed  possible  when  men  followed 
the  leading  of  blind  passion  in  the  heat  of  battle. 
It  certainly  was  so  in  the  case  of  Egypt,  for  the 
national  quickening  which  continued  for  many 
centuries  to  affect  Egyptian  life  is  easily  traceable 
to  this  period.  Nor  was  it  less  so  in  the  case  of 
Phoenicia.  The  stimulus  received  from  this  move 
ment  of  displacement  lifted  them  from  the  ranks 


24       THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

of  mere  carriers  and  commercial  intermediaries  to 
the  high  position  of  the  great  manufacturing  nation 
of  the  ancient  world.  It  can  hardly  be  doubted 
that  their  genius  in  creating  wares  whose  quality 
and  artistic  skill  challenge  even  to-day  comparison 
with  the  best  we  produce,  must  be  traced  in  some 
directions  to  the  amalgamation  of  their  population 
with  the  displaced  Hyksos  who  received  their  train 
ing  in  Egypt. 

The  sifting  and  shaking  down  again  to  a  new 
order  of  things  benefited  not  only  Phoenicia,  but, 
through  them,  the  peoples  of  the  Mediterranean 
basin  generally.  At  the  same  time  it  must  have 
acted  as  a  tonic  on  the  manufacturing  centres  of 
Babylonia,  for  the  trade  with  the  west  could  only 
have  been  retained  by  a  corresponding  progress 
there.  As  an  educative  force  this  movement  must 
have  quickened  the  progress  of  civilisation  in  Asia 
as  well  as  Europe,  and  eventually  benefited  the 
world  at  large. 

Perhaps  at  this  point  it  may  be  prudent  to  re 
trace  our  steps  for  a  little  in  order  that  we  may 
clear  away  a  misunderstanding  with  reference  to 
a  tradition  reported  by  Trogas  as  to  the  route  by 
which  a  portion  of  the  Phoenician  people  reached 
the  Syrian  coast.  He  says  that  they  travelled  as 
far  as  the  Syrian  lake,  on  whose  shores  they  rested. 
Some  authorities  have  read  this  as  referring  to  the 
Phoenicians  from  Tylos  and  Arados,  the  lake  being 
Bambykes  near  the  Euphrates.  Others  again  seek 
to  identify  it  with  the  waters  of  Merom  or  the  Sea 
of  Galilee,  while  a  third  section  claim  that  it  refers 
to  the  Dead  or  Salt  Sea.  From  what  has  already 
been  said  it  is  more  than  probable  that  the  last 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING    25 

of  these  (a  view  which  receives  the  support  of 
that  eminent  Egyptologist,  M.  Maspero)  must  be 
considered  as  the  only  tenable  view.  If  so,  then 
it  cannot  have  reference  to  |the  movement  from  the 
Persian  Gulf. 

As  the  movement  of  the  Hyksos  from  Egypt 
was,  according  to  Manetho,  in  the  direction  of 
Jerusalem,  and  occurred  about  the  time  of  Abraham, 
which  is  usually  placed  about  the  eighteenth  century 
B.C.,  it  jequires  no  vivid  imagination  to  realise  that 
the  settlers  must  have  been  a  portion  of  the  dis 
placed  Hyksos,  for,  according  to  Genesis  xiii.  10,  the 
region  "  was  well  watered  everywhere,  even  as  the 
garden  of  the  Lord,  like  the  land  of  Egypt  as  thou 
comest  into  Zoar."  Moreover,  the  lake  into  which 
the  Jordan  flowed,  lying  like  a  mirror  in  a  garden 
of  green,  must  have  made  the  region  peculiarly 
inviting  to  these  exiles,  who  for  so  many  centuries 
had  been  residents  of  the  well-watered  and  fertile 
fields  of  the  Delta. 

The  awful  cataclysm  which  followed  in  the  wake 
of  their  settlement  and  sunk  the  lake  far  below  sea- 
level  would  naturally  increase  its  area,  and,  swallow 
ing  up  the  cities  that  lined  its  margin,  turn  the 
fruitful  fields  into  the  barren  wilderness  we  find 
to-day.  They  would  thus  be  driven  to  the  north 
and  west,  to  the  fertile  fields  of  Siddim  (Gen.  xiv.  8), 
to  the  well- watered  valleys  of  the  Jordan,  or  to  the 
plateaus  and  low  lands  of  the  coast  line.  Curiously 
enough  the  date  of  all  these  historic  events  not  only 
accords  with  that  of  the  evacuation  of  Egypt  by 
the  Hyksos,  but  closely  with  that  of  the  Scripture 
narrative  according  to  Archbishop  Usher's  chronology 
(Gen.  xii.  16  and  xxiii.  19). 


26      THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

If,  therefore,  this  explanation — one  by  no  means 
devoid  of  probability — be  correct,  we  have  a  simple 
and  natural  solution  of  the  difficulty,  and  one  that 
does  no  violence  to  the  facts  recorded  in  Egyptian, 
Phoenician,  or  Hebrew  history.  It  is  equally  in 
accord  with  the  tradition  recorded  by  Herodotus. 
Naturally  enough  the  Phoenicians  would  refrain 
from  narrating  to  the  Greek  stranger  any  of  those 
episodes  in  their  composite  national  career  which 
even  at  that  distance  of  time  must  have  rankled  in 
the  memory  of  the  people  as  they  thought  of  their 
severance,  even  on  honourable  terms,  from  a  terri 
tory  so  splendid  in  association  and  offering  such  a 
vantage  ground  of  magnificent  possibilities  for  the 
furtherance  of  that  unparalleled  commercial  career 
on  which  they  had  embarked. 

If,  then,  the  Phoenicians  of  the  Persian  Gulf  had 
established  themselves  on  the  Syrian  coasts  and 
erected  the  temple  to  Hercules  2300  years  before 
the  visit  of  Herodotus  (ii.  64),  which  is  usually 
placed  about  457-456  B.C.,  then  they  must  have 
been  securely  settled  there  about  2756  B.C.,  and  as 
we  have  seen  that  the  exodus  of  the  Hyksos  took 
place  about  1720  B.C.,  the  Phoenician  towns  of  Tyre 
and  Sidon  must  have  been  busy  centres  of  commerce 
and  manufacture  for  many  centuries  before  this 
event.  It  is  easy,  therefore,  to  understand  how  a 
considerable  amalgamation  of  this  common  stock 
with  kindred  sympathies  may  have  taken  place 
from  that  time  forward,  tending  not  only  to  elevate 
the  social  condition  of  the  fishing  towns,  but  to 
impart  a  new  influence  with  a  distinctly  Egyptian 
leaning  in  culture,  art,  manufacture,  and  trade, 
and  perhaps  more  than  all  in  architecture  and 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING    27 

construction.  With  these  points  made  clear,  we 
are  now  again  in  a  position  to  take  up  the  course  of 
our  narrative. 

With  the  trade  of  the  Mediterranean  basin  in 
their  hands,  backed  by  long  experience  in  the 
markets  of  Babylonia,  Arabia,  and  Egypt,  and 
greatly  augmented  capital,  the  Phoenicians  were 
now  in  a  position  to  control  not  only  the  western 
trade,  but  to  undertake  any  operations  for  the  ex 
tension  either  of  their  manufactures  or  their  com 
merce.  With  their  weaving,  dyeing,  glass  making, 
metallurgy,  and  other  manufactures  in  operation, 
and  a  supply  of  skilled  labour  that  can  only  be 
explained  by  the  junction  of  the  forces  of  the  Phoe 
nicians  with  the  Hyksos,  it  is  easy  to  understand 
the  later  manufacturing  expansion  of  the  Phoenicians 
and  the  prevalence  of  Babylonian  and  Egyptian 
motives  in  their  permanent  designs. 

Prior  to  this  movement,  so  far  as  history  throws 
any  light  on  the  situation,  the  Phoenicians  were 
simply  traders.  We  have  no  record  of  the  existence 
of  any  manufacturing  establishments  on  the  Persian 
Gulf,  nor,  in  the  beginning,  do  they  seem  to  have 
existed  at  Sidon.  The  Phoenicians  possessed  ships, 
caravans,  and  warehouses  only.  In  the  co-ordina 
tion  of  their  forces  with  the  exiles  from  Egypt, 
however,  a  new  career  opened  to  them,  for  with  the 
necessary  skilled  labour  within  their  own  boundaries 
manufactories  of  their  own  were  erected  and  their 
products  thrown  on  the  markets  of  the  ancient  world. 

By  reason  of  the  very  peculiar  position  in  which 
they  were  placed  they  were  in  a  position  to  begin 
where  other  nations  had  left  off.  They  did  not 
require  to  create  the  looms  to  weave,  or  the  vats  to 


28     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

dye,  the  blow-pipe  to  fashion  glass,  or  to  cultivate 
the  flax  for  linen.  Like  the  alphabet,  they  inherited 
these,  but  being  an  eminently  receptive  people,  they 
did  what  neither  the  Babylonians  nor  Egyptians 
were  capable  of  doing — they  eliminated  the  less 
valuable  from  what  they  had  derived  from  these 
sources  and  superadded  something  of  their  own. 
Thus  was  produced  a  new  type  as  distinctly  Phoe 
nician  as  before  it  had  been  Babylonian  or  Egyptian. 

The  training  through  which  the  nation  as  a  united 
people  passed  was  advantageous  in  another  direction. 
It  specially  fitted  them  to  cater  with  their  manu 
factured  wares  to  the  markets  of  Babylonia  and 
Egypt  equally  with  those  regions  such  as  Palestine 
and  Arabia,  which  had  for  long  centuries  been 
dependent  on  the  older  centres  of  trade. 

In  looking  back  over  this  period  of  reconstruc 
tion,  it  is  impossible  to  overestimate  the  value  of 
those  varied  experiences  through  which  the  nation 
passed  in  the  development  of  that  flexibility  of 
temperament  and  that  catholicity  in  art  that 
formed  so  marked  a  feature  of  the  Phoenician  life 
throughout  its  long  career.  Since  it  was  the  des 
tiny  of  unified  Phoenicia  that  she  should  become 
to  the  ancient  world  the  missionary  of  material 
civilisation,  it  was  necessary  that  her  people  should 
have  a  unique  training.  To  apprehend  the  atmos 
phere  of  the  traditions  of  the  people,  to  catch  the 
inspiration  of  their  institutions  and  customs  in 
order  to  effectively  appeal  to  the  national  prejudice 
and  the  religious  sentiment,  it  was  essential  that 
the  artisan  even  more  than  the  merchant  should 
have  received  his  initial  inspiration  on  the  ground, 
so  to  speak,  otherwise  the  products  of  his  skill, 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING    29 

while  approximating  to  those  ideals  which  he  strove 
to  translate,  would  always  fail  in  producing  that 
local  atmosphere,  that  intangible  something  which 
is  the  very  crux  of  art  and  gives  it  its  final  value. 

The  staple  products  of  any  manufacturing  people, 
but  especially  of  any  semi-civilised  people,  are  apt 
to  be  a  mere  expression  of  their  thought.  However 
successfully  they  may  interpret  some  more  or  less 
familiar  phase  of  external  nature,  or  adapt  themselves 
to  the  climatic  conditions  which  the  region  they 
inhabit  imposes,  it  is  obvious  that  goods  manu 
factured  under  such  conditions  and  for  such  a 
restricted  area  must  be  acceptable  in  few  markets. 
To  manufacture  for  and  be  the  successful  commercial 
intermediaries  of  the  ancient  world,  it  was  essential 
that  the  Phoenicians  should  have  passed  very  far 
beyond  this  stage  and  developed  among  themselves 
types  that  were  not  local  but  cosmopolitan  in  their 
attractiveness.  In  this  respect  the  Phoenicians  emi 
nently  distinguished  themselves. 

The  region  to  which  they  had  come,  whether 
drawn  by  choice  or  driven  by  necessity,  was  one 
peculiarly  fitted  to  stimulate  the  imaginative  facul 
ties.  It  comprised  within  its  boundaries  every 
natural  element  necessary  to  the  development  of  a 
high  order  of  intellect,  especially  in  the  case  of  a 
people  the  rudimentary  stages  of  whose  education 
had  been  obtained  in  the  best  schools.  The  isola 
tion  created  by  the  vast  deserts  adjacent  to  Phoe 
nicia  and  Egypt  was  in  some  measure  a  means  of 
security,  and  had  a  definite  tendency  not  only  to 
create  but  to  perpetuate  certain  well-marked  types. 
This  isolation,  however,  did  more  for  Phoenicia 
than  it  did  for  Egypt,  for  it  fitted  it  to  become, 


30     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

in  material  things,  what  the  Jew  among  the  same 
surroundings  became  in  spiritual  things.  Who 
could  so  easily  provide  for  the  inhabitants  of  the 
frigid  north  as  the  Phoenician  ?  He  possessed  not 
only  the  wool  of  the  desert  sheep,  the  distaff  to  spin, 
the  looms  to  weave,  and  the  vats  to  dye,  but  a 
population  within  his  own  borders  in  daily  need  of 
such  goods.  Must  his  produce  be  adapted  to  the 
denizen  of  the  sweltering  tropics  ?  He  knew  what 
was  required.  The  region  to  be  supplied  was  one 
he  was  familiar  with.  Was  it  necessary  to  find 
raiment  for  the  wandering  Bedouins  of  the  desert  ? 
They  were  his  near  neighbours,  the  people  who 
brought  from  afar  the  wealth  of  Ophir.  Must  he 
anticipate  the  wants  of  those  that  went  down  to 
the  sea  in  ships  ?  Phoenicia  was  mistress  of  the 
seas.  Her  ships  sailed  to  all  ports  and  traversed 
all  oceans,  while  her  harbours  were  the  havens 
where  the  argosies  would  fain  be. 

Palestine  was  necessary  for  the  evolution  of  the 
Jew.  His  mission  was  a  universal  one,  and  a 
universal  sympathy  with  the  idiosyncrasies  of  men 
could  only  have  been  evolved  where  nature  found 
its  most  abundant  and  highest  forms  of  expression. 
In  order  that  such  a  national  education  should  be 
complete,  however,  it  was  necessary  that  it  should 
have  had  its  beginnings  in  the  valley  of  the  Nile, 
and  that  every  form  of  experience  from  that  of 
slave  to  lawgiver  and  priest  should  have  been  passed 
through  amid  the  refining  influences  of  the  highest 
form  of  civilisation. 

But  such  training  was  not  less  necessary  to  the 
Phoenician.  To  be  the  missionary  of  material 
civilisation  as  of  a  universal  religion  a  long  and 


THE    PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    MAKING     31 

arduous  training  was  necessary.  In  this  respect 
Phoenicia  might  well  say  that  other  men  had 
laboured  and  she  had  entered  into  their  labours. 
Yet  the  processes  by  which  this  was  accomplished 
were,  in  the  case  of  the  Phoenicians,  as  effective  as 
those  very  different  methods  which  operated  in  the 
case  of  the  Jews. 

The  time,  however,  was  appointed  for  the  co 
ordinating  of  what  was  already  in  existence  of  the 
divine  plan,  and  without  this  co-ordinating  there 
never  could  have  been  superimposed  those  more 
advanced  forms  of  religious,  ethical,  and  material 
civilisation  of  which  these  two  nations  were  the  fore 
runners  and  exponents.  They  incorporated  in 
themselves  the  best  that,  in  these  directions,  had 
survived  previous  races  and  generations  of  men. 

It  is  true  that  neither  Jew  nor  Phoenician 
achieved  their  manifest  destiny,  but  will  we,  in  the 
face  of  what  we  now  know  of  the  history  of  these 
two  peoples,  believe  that  the  plan  of  their  career 
was  any  the  less  divinely  appointed  ? 


CHAPTER    II 

THE   PHOENICIAN   LAND   TRADE 

Region  of  Phoenicia — Colony  of  Sidon — Phoenician  art  and  craftsman 
ship — Commercial  expansion — Arabian  and  Babylonian  trade — 
Importance  of  the  former — Its  nature  and  transport — Phoenicians 
as  the  carriers  of  the  world — Western  trade. 

THE  little  strip  of  Syrian  coast  occupied  by  the 
Phoenicians  was  familiar  to  the  Greeks  and  Romans 
by  the  name  of  Phceniki,  interpreted  by  some  as 
"  the  palm  land  "  or  "  the  land  where  the  palms 
grew/'  by  others  as  "  blood  red,"  from  the  richer 
shade  of  their  famous  purple  dye,  and  the  dark  red 
complexion  of  the  people.  It  is  probable,  however, 
that  the  former  of  these  explanations  is  the  correct 
one.  The  Phoenician  territory,  so  far  as  can  be 
gathered  from  the  Biblical  records,  was  not  included 
by  the  Hebrews  under  the  name  of  either  Canaan 
or  Phoenicia,  but  was  familiar  to  them  as  Chittim. 
In  Numbers  xxiv.  24  the  name  is  applied  to  a 
western  power  generally,  which  at  that  date  and  in 
this  connection  would  be  quite  satisfactory.  This 
again  is  corroborated  in  Jeremiah  ii.  10,  where  the 
name  is  applied  to  the  dominant  western  region  as 
distinguished  from  Kedar  in  the  east,  embracing 
not  only  the  coasts  but  also  the  islands  washed  by 
the  eastern  Mediterranean,  these  being  under  the 
control  of  a  great  naval  power. 

Chittim   of   the   Old  Testament  narrative   may 
therefore  be  safely  regarded,  like  Ophir,  as  repre- 


THE    PHOENICIAN    LAND    TRADE       33 

senting  no  particular  spot  or  place,  but  rather  a 
region  under  the  control  of  the  dominant  naval  and 
commercial  power  of  that  period.  In  this  sense, 
therefore,  Chittim  to  the  Jewish  mind  did  not  mean 
Cittium  the  later  Larnika,  or  even  the  strip  of  coast 
line  occupied  by  the  Phoenicians,  but  greater  Phoe 
nicia,  including  the  colonies  on  Cyprus,  the  Sporades 
and  Cyclades,  the  Hellenic  Peninsula  or  Apia,  and 
the  shores  of  Asia  Minor  prior  to  their  occupancy  by 
the  Greeks.  It  is  highly  important  to  have  a  clear 
conception  of  the  nomenclature  of  the  region,  for 
upon  this  depends,  to  a  large  extent,  the  final 
elucidation  of  this  complex  problem. 

Phoenicia  proper,  as  it  was  known  to  the  Greeks 
and  Romans  from  whom  the  name  has  come 
down  to  us,  was  the  little  strip  of  country  stretching 
from  Gabula  to  Dora  on  the  Syrian  coast  to  the  north 
of  Palestine.  The  territory  which  it  embraced  was 
not  more  than  200  miles  long,  by  an  average  of 
20  miles  broad,  occupying  a  superficial  area  of  about 
4000  square  miles.  Even  in  its  most  prosperous 
period  Phoenicia  proper  was  therefore  one  of  the 
smallest  countries  of  antiquity — so  small  as  to  be 
less  than  Palestine,  only  a  little  larger  than  York 
shire  in  England,  and  a  little  less  than  Wales.  In 
spite,  however,  of  the  insignificance  of  Phoenicia's 
territorial  dimensions,  its  central  position  with  re 
spect  to  the  great  seats  of  commerce  and  civilisation, 
the  nature  of  its  products,  and  its  commercial  affilia 
tions  with  the  contiguous  countries,  were  of  such 
a  character  as  quickly  elevated  it  to  a  commanding 
position  in  the  history  of  the  ancient  world.  Its 
coast-line  was  not  deeply  indented,  yet  was  suffi 
ciently  irregular  to  create  a  number  of  natural 

c 


34     THE    PHOENICIANS   AND   AMERICA 

harbours,  which  provided  ports  of  sufficient  dimen 
sions  to  accommodate  fleets  of  considerable  size. 

The  situation  of  the  territory  for  the  develop 
ment  of  a  commercial  career  was  therefore,  apart 
from  its  value  as  the  home  of  the  murex,  well 
chosen.  The  sea  that  fronted  the  new  home  re 
duced  dockage  to  its  simplest  terms,  for  it  was 
tideless,  usually  calm,  and  invited  to  navigation. 
Cyprus  was  clearly  visible  on  the  western  horizon, 
and  led  the  way  to  Rhodes  and  Cyndus,  the  Sporades 
and  Cyclades,  the  coasts  of  Asia  Minor  and  Apia, 
the  later  Peloponnesus,  which,  before  many  years 
were  past,  were  studded  with  their  colonies  and 
became  tributary  to  their  trade. 

We  have  no  information  with  respect  to  the 
population  of  Phoenicia  proper  during  any  portion 
of  its  history,  but  from  the  restricted  territory  which 
it  occupied,  the  impossibility  of  expansion  owing 
to  its  mountainous  surroundings,  and  its  enormous 
mercantile  operations,  there  can  be  no  doubt  that 
it  must  have  been  very  dense. 

Owing  to  trade  expansion  or  to  civil  disputes,  so 
common  in  over-crowded  communities,  all  the 
Phoenician  cities  were  colonies  of  each  other, 
founded  by  a  species  of  "  budding  off  "  from  the 
first  foundations.  Thus  Sidon  was  a  colony  founded 
by  the  emigrants  from  the  Persian  Gulf,  and  Tyre 
and  Aradus  are  usually  accredited  with  being 
colonies  of  Sidon.  Tripolis — the  threefold  city— 
as  the  name  implies,  was  a  joint  colony  of  the  three 
towns — Sidon,  Aradus,  and  Tyre. 

Sidon,  in  spite  of  the  very  ancient  date  usually 
accredited  to  the  foundation  of  Tyre  (Her.  ii.  44), 
is  generally  accorded  the  distinction  of  having  been 


THE    PHOENICIAN    LAND   TRADE       35 

the  oldest  of  the  Phoenician  settlements.  Why  it 
was  erected  we  can  only  conjecture.  Still,  as 
Sidon  in  the  native  tongue  means  fish,  and  as  the 
chief  renown  of  the  Phoenicians  as  a  manufacturing 
people  was  from  the  beginning  identified  with  the 
purple  dye  obtained  from  the  shell-fish,  murex,  and 
purpura  found  on  their  coasts,  it  is  probable  that 
in  the  name  Sidon — or  the  fishing  town — we  have 
more  than  a  valuable  clue.  Especially  is  this  the 
case  in  view  of  the  fact  that  the  dye  obtained  from 
the  shell-fish  found  on  the  Syrian  coast  was  always 
more  valuable  than  that  obtained  elsewhere,  and 
reached  its  highest  perfection  when  applied  to  the 
fleeces  obtained  from  the  adjoining  deserts. 

From  first  to  last  Sidon  was  in  great  repute 
throughout  the  ancient  world,  not  only  for  its  dyes 
and  its  beautiful  garments,  but  also  for  its  glass 
ware  and  its  metallurgy  ;  and  its  history  in  this 
respect  was  simply  the  history  of  the  other  Phoe 
nician  towns  which  sprang  from  it.  It  seems  clear, 
then,  that  in  the  discovery  of  the  purple-producing 
murex,  the  fishing  for  the  shell-fish,  the  preparation 
of  the  dye,  and  its  application  to  the  fleeces  of  the 
desert,  spinning,  weaving,  and  the  manufacture  of 
the  cloth  into  garments,  and  at  a  later  period,  when 
joined  by  the  Hyksos,  the  introduction  of  the  allied 
arts  and  industries,  we  have  all  the  information 
necessary  to  understand  the  causes  which  led  to 
the  change  of  base  from  the  Persian  Gulf  as  well  as 
the  phenomenal  development  which  took  place  in 
the  early  Phoenician  settlements. 

The  purple  dye  which  was  the  potent  means  of 
creating  Phoenicia  was  wholly  different  from  that 
for  which  Babylonia  was  famous.  It  was  obtained 


36      THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

mainly  from  a  small  sac  or  vein  in  the  neck  of  the 
shell-fish,  an  object  so  infinitesimal  in  size  that  one 
is  amazed  that  the  discovery  of  its  properties  led 
to  results  so  potent  in  the  distribution  of  mankind 
and  the  spread  of  civilisation  in  the  ancient  world. 
Though  the  dye  of  the  murex  in  later  years  was  by 
no  means  the  exclusive  property  of  the  Phoenicians, 
they  brought  the  industry  to  a  higher  state  of  per 
fection  than  any  other  manufacturing  nation.  The 
scarlet  and  violet  purples  of  the  Sidonians  and 
Tyrians  were  for  centuries  the  prevailing  fashion 
among  the  aristocratic  and  priestly  ranks  of  society. 
The  dyed  stuffs  issuing  from  the  Phoenician  vats 
were  not,  however,  all  obtained  from  the  murex. 
The  Phoenicians  were  equally  skilled  in  the  use  of 
vegetable  dyes,  and  these  were  doubtless  liberally 
used  in  the  production  of  the  cheaper  fabrics,  such 
as  cottons  and  linens.  Still  the  best  results  were 
only  obtained  when  the  dye  of  the  murex  was 
applied  to  the  fine  fleeces  obtained  from  the  sheep 
of  the  adjoining  deserts.  The  dye  being  applied  to 
the  raw  material,  there  sprang  up  all  along  the  Phoe 
nician  coast  weaving  centres  which  made  Phoenicia 
famous  the  world  over. 

While  a  claim  has  been  made  that  glass  was 
the  invention  of  the  Phoenicians,  there  seems  good 
reason  for  believing  that  its  manufacture  was  de 
rived  from  Egypt.  The  sands  of  the  Belus,  however, 
lent  themselves  to  the  production  of  an  exquisite 
quality  of  this  commodity,  and  the  glass  trade, 
according  to  Pliny,  was  mainly  in  the  hands  of  the 
Phoenicians  for  centuries — the  principal  seats  of 
the  industry  being  Sidon  and  Sarepta.  As  the  fine 
climate  in  the  East  made  windows  unnecessary, 


THE    PHOENICIAN    LAND    TRADE       37 

glass  was  mainly  used  at  this  time  for  decorating 
the  walls  and  ceilings  of  the  apartments  of  the 
wealthy  classes,  in  which  the  Phoenicians  displayed 
their  great  artistic  skill.  Glass  was  also  applied 
at  Sidon  and  other  coast  towns  to  the  manufacture 
of  what  are  known  as  agry  beads,  which  have  been 
found  in  tombs  in  all  parts  of  Europe  and  Asia, 
and  even  at  Ash  ant  ee  on  the  west  coast  of  Africa. 
These  were  made  of  an  opaque  glass  generally 
coloured  and  showing  considerable  skill  in  manipu 
lation. 

The  drinking  vessels  of  the  Phoenicians  were 
mainly  of  stone  and  precious  metals,  though  at 
Sidon  bottles,  vases,  drinking  cups,  bowls,  and 
other  utensils  were  manufactured,  while  smaller 
objects,  exquisitely  fashioned  by  means  of  the  blow 
pipe  and  engraved  either  by  the  use  of  a  wheel  or  by 
a  sharp  graving  tool,  were  produced. 

For  metallurgy  Tyre  and  Sidon  were  equally 
famous.  This  was  undoubtedly  a  Phoenician  in 
vention,  and  bronze  seems  to  have  been  their 
favourite  metal.  So  skilful  did  the  Phoenicians 
become  in  this  branch  of  industry  that  by  a  method 
of  treatment  known  only  to  themselves  and  the 
Egyptians,  and  now  lost  to  mankind,  they  could 
form  bronze  into  knives  and  even  razors,  that 
carried  an  edge  like  steel.  The  manufacture  of 
bronze  was  peculiarly  Phoenician  art.  It  was  a 
Tyrian  artist  who  fashioned  for  Solomon  the  great 
bronze  molten  sea  or  laver,  45  feet  in  circumference, 
supported  on  the  back  of  twelve  oxen,  as  well  as 
the  magnificent  bronze  pillars,  Jachin  and  Boax, 
each  40  feet  in  height,  which  were  accounted  among 
the  chief  glories  of  the  temple  at  Jerusalem. 


38     THE    PHOENICIANS   AND    AMERICA 

The  works  of  the  Phoenicians  in  metallurgy  were 
not,  however,  confined  to  bronze.  They  were 
equally  skilful  in  handling  the  precious  metals. 
It  was  Hiram,  a  Phoenician  workman,  who  fashioned 
for  Solomon  the  altars  and  tables  of  gold  whereon 
the  shewbread  was  set ;  as  well  as  the  ten  candle 
sticks,  the  lamps,  the  flowers,  the  tongs  and  snuffers, 
which  were  the  chef  d'ceuvres  of  the  Jewish  temple. 
In  ordinary  articles  of  personal  adornment  the 
Phoenicians  were  equally  deft.  In  the  great 
sepulchre  at  Beyrut,  described  by  M.  Renan  in  his 
Mission  de  Phenice  (p.  39),  were  found  a  great 
number  of  women's  trinkets,  including  two  gold 
bracelets  of  fine  workmanship,  another  ornamented 
with  coloured  stones,  and  sixteen  finger  rings,  all 
of  which  betokened  the  astonishing  manual  dex 
terity  of  the  Phoenician  workmen.  Nor  was  the 
skill  and  proficiency  of  the  Phoenicians  as  engravers 
of  hard  stones  less  remarkable.  In  this  field  they 
were  vastly  superior  to  the  Egyptians  and  Baby 
lonians,  their  designs  being  drawn  with  greater 
spirit  and  fidelity  to  life. 

Tyre,  as  has  already  been  remarked,  was  appar 
ently  a  colony  of  Sidon,  founded  with  a  view  to  the 
further  development  of  the  murex  fishing,  and  as  a 
distributing  centre  for  the  manufactured  products 
of  the  older  town.  The  first  foundation  was  on 
the  mainland,  and  for  many  centuries  was  only  of 
secondary  importance  to  Sidon.  But  on  the  sub 
jugation  of  the  latter  town  by  the  Philistines  of 
Askalon  about  1250  B.C.,  Tyre,  which  had  been 
growing  rapidly  in  power  and  affluence,  became  the 
principal  seat  of  trade  and  political  influence,  and 
so  continued  until  the  time  of  the  thirteen  years' 


THE    PHOENICIAN    LAND    TRADE       39 

investiture  by  Nebuchadnezzar  in  585  B.C.,  when  the 
greater  part  of  the  inhabitants,  taking  refuge  on  the 
adjacent  island,  already  in  some  measure  occupied 
by  their  establishments,  founded  the  island  city  of 
Tyre,  which,  in  consequence  of  its  strong  position, 
soon  outgrew  the  town  on  the  mainland.  Not 
only  did  the  island  city  of  Tyre  outlive  the  Baby 
lonian  and  Persian  monarchies,  but  by  reason  of 
their  decline  continued  to  increase  in  power  and 
opulence  until  it  was  recognised  as  the  commercial 
capital  of  the  world.  It  was  captured,  however, 
and  in  a  great  measure  destroyed  by  Alexander 
the  Great  in  332  B.C. 

Although  Tyre,  Sidon,  Aradus,  and  Tripolis 
were  much  more  intimately  identified  with  the 
history  of  Phoenicia  than  any  of  the  other  towns  on 
the  coast,  yet  these  latter,  from  a  commercial  point 
of  view,  are  only  less  worthy  of  recognition.  About 
eighteen  miles  south  of  Tripolis  was  Byblus,  famous 
for  its  temple  to  Adonis,  one  of  the  chief  seats  of 
the  licentious  orgies  identified  with  the  Phoenician 
religious  cult.  To  the  south  of  this  was  Berytus, 
now  by  far  the  most  flourishing  city  on  the  Syrian 
coast,  but  at  that  time  simply  a  dependency  of 
Sidon  or  of  Byblus.  There  were  other  towns  of 
less  importance,  but  still  seats  of  art  and  industry. 

With  the  accession  of  Hiram,  the  son  of  Abibaal 
and  the  friend  of  Solomon,  to  the  throne,  the 
trade  of  Tyre,  owing  to  the  tremendous  expansion 
of  commerce  towards  the  western  Mediterranean, 
grew  to  such  proportions  that  it  was  found  neces 
sary  to  take  steps  for  the  enlargement  of  the  island 
city,  and  to  this  end  great  engineering  works  were 
inaugurated.  The  main  island  was  enlarged  to 


40     THE    PHOENICIANS   AND   AMERICA 

the  east  by  filling  up  the  shore  for  a  considerable 
distance  with  stone  and  rubbish  and  closing  the 
channel  between  the  two  islands,  so  making  one 
with  a  circumference  of  two  and  a  half  miles.  At 
the  same  time  the  old  temple  of  Hercules  was  pulled 
down,  and  on  a  new  and  more  commanding  site 
temples  to  Melkarth  and  Astarte,  the  principal 
deities  of  the  Tyrians,  were  reared. 

The  activities  of  the  Tyrians  were  not,  however, 
confined  to  the  enlargement  of  the  city  and  the 
erection  of  these  temples.  Mindful  of  their  enor 
mous  commercial  expansion  the  main  ports  were 
greatly  improved.  During  the  period  from  1300  B.C. 
to  1000  B.C.  Phoenician  colonisation  had  reached  its 
furthest  limits,  covering  all  the  islands  and  shores 
of  the  Mediterranean  and  reaching  as  far  as  the 
Atlantic,  the  coasts  of  Britain,  and  even  Norway. 
In  order  that  commodious  harbours  for  the  ships 
of  Tharshish  employed  in  the  Spanish  trade  might 
be  provided,  engineering  works  of  vast  dimensions 
were  undertaken  at  the  island  of  Tyre.  Mr.  Raw- 
linson  (p.  42),  who  describes  these  works  with  great 
minuteness,  says  :  "At  the  north-eastern  extremity 
of  the  island  two  piers  of  solid  stone  were  carried 
out  from  the  shore  into  the  sea  at  a  distance  of  about 
a  hundred  feet  from  each  other,  and  to  a  distance 
from  the  shore  of  about  seven  hundred  feet,  which, 
running  nearly  due  east  and  west,  formed  an  effec 
tive  barrier  against  the  north  wind,  and  secured  to 
vessels  needed  protection.  The  outer  line  of  wall 
was  a  mere  breakwater,  but  the  inner  one  was  a 
real  pier  so  deflected  at  its  eastern  extremity  as  to 
join  a  low  ridge  of  rocks  which  formed  a  natural 
protection  to  the  harbour  on  the  east,  and  secure  it 


THE    PHOENICIAN    LAND   TRADE       41 

against  squalls  from  Lebanon.  Another  ridge  ran 
out  to  meet  this  and  completed  the  shelter  on  this 
side,  the  mouth  of  the  harbour  between  the  two 
ridges,  which  were  strengthened  by  art,  having  a 
width  of  about  105  feet."  The  extent  of  space 
thus  enclosed  and  made  absolutely  safe  in  all  winds, 
had  an  area  of  about  7500  yards,  which  was  sufficient 
to  accommodate  several  hundred  vessels  of  the  size 
usually  employed  by  the  ancients. 

As,  however,  no  harbour  could  be  accessible 
under  all  conditions  of  wind  and  weather,  and 
Tyrian  commerce  required  that  vessels  should  be 
able  to  make  port  in  all  seasons,  a  second  harbour 
was  constructed  at  the  southern  extremity  of  the 
island  which,  from  its  looking  towards  Egypt,  was 
known  as  the  Egyptian  harbour.  Here  a  pier 
was  carried  out  from  the  south-western  part  of 
the  island  to  a  distance  of  200  yards  in  a  south 
westerly  direction,  and  a  wall  was  carried  thence 
to  the  south-eastern  extremity  of  the  islands,  a 
single  opening  being  left  which  could  be  closed  by 
a  boom.  A  space  of  800  yards  long  and  from  50 
to  150  wide  was  thus  walled  in.  Finally,  to 
secure  communication  between  the  two  harbours 
a  canal  was  dug,  which  enabled  vessels  to  pass 
from  the  Syrian  to  the  Egyptian  harbours,  and  vice 
versa. 

What  portion  of  these  works  which  made  Tyre 
the  most  commodious  and  safest  harbour  on  the 
Phoenician  coast  was  due  to  Hiram's  initiative  it 
is  difficult  to  determine,  but  as  these  works  seem 
to  have  stimulated  Solomon  to  enlarge  and  beautify 
Jerusalem  and  provide  it  with  an  abundant  water 
supply,  it  is  more  than  probable  that  they  were  all 


42       THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

parts  of  one  comprehensive  scheme  made  necessary 
by  the  developments  in  Tharshish. 

But  the  energies  of  the  people  during  this  period 
were  not  wholly  engrossed  in  the  prosecution  of 
the  western  Mediterranean  trade.  The  main  trend 
of  their  commerce  was  still  towards  the  east  and 
south,  but  more  especially  towards  Yemen1  and 
Gerrha,2  which,  even  before  the  days  of  Moses,  went 
by  the  general  name  of  Ophir. 

There  is  probably  no  subject  connected  with 
the  history  of  early  commerce  and  navigation  on 
which  so  much  has  been  written  as  that  of  Ophir, 
and  probably  on  no  subject  has  so  little  been  satis 
factorily  determined.  The  name  was  identified 
with  one  of  the  grandsons  of  Noah  (Gen.  x.  29), 
who,  with  his  descendants,  occupied  the  region 
situated  between  Bactriana  and  the  Indian  Ocean. 
Like  the  name  of  other  distant  regions  in  ancient 
geography,  it  represented  no  particular  spot,  but 
only  a  certain  roughly  defined  region  of  the 
world. 

The  trade  included  under  the  general  name  of 
Ophir  proved  most  important  to  the  Phoenicians, 
embracing  as  it  did  what  by  later  writers  has 
been  described  as  the  Arabian  East  Indian  trade. 
The  long  residence  of  the  Phoenicians  on  the  islands 
of  the  Persian  Gulf  had  made  the  coasts  of  India 
and  Ceylon  very  familiar  to  them,  and  there  is  good 
reason  to  believe  that  they  had  an  equally  intimate 
acquaintance  with  the  Red  Sea  and  its  ports.  There 
was  also  a  time  when  not  only  the  coast  line  but 
every  portion  of  the  interior  of  Arabia  was  as  familiar 
to  their  caravans  as  the  coasts  were  to  their  ships. 

1  Red  Sea.  2  Persian  Gulf. 


THE    PHOENICIAN    LAND    TRADE       43 

It  is  unfortunate  that  beyond  casual  references 
found  in  Genesis  xxxvii.  25  and  Judges  viii.  24, 
and  more  particularly  in  the  27th  chapter  of  Ezekiel, 
we  have  no  satisfactory  information  regarding  the 
trade  of  Tyre  in  the  region  prior  to  600  B.C.  From 
the  nature  of  this  trade  and  the  fact  that  the  Phoe 
nicians  had  no  ports  of  their  own  on  the  Red  Sea, 
it  is  apparent  that  it  must  have  been  carried  on 
mainly  by  caravan.  Indeed  the  passage  in  Ezekiel 
to  which  we  have  referred  seems  to  indicate  that 
these  caravans  were  formed  by  the  Nomad  tribes 
men,  who,  from  their  mode  of  life,  were  better 
adapted  to  this  business  than  the  dwellers  in  the 
coast  towns.  Tyre  in  this  respect  was  fortunately 
situated,  for  she  had  on  her  own  borders  numerous 
tribes  which  she  was  able  to  employ  in  this  way, 
and  who  wandered  over  the  Syrian  and  Arabian 
deserts.  Diodorus  says  "  that  no  small  number  of 
these  Nomad  tribesmen  followed  the  business  of 
carrying  to  the  Mediterranean  frankincense  and 
myrrh  and  other  costly  spices,  which  they  purchased 
from  the  merchants  who  brought  them  from  Arabia 
to  the  northern  borders  of  the  country/'  The  des 
tination  of  the  caravans,  according  to  this  view, 
must  have  been  the  central  mart  at  Petra,  and  this, 
when  taken  in  conjunction  with  the  statement  of 
the  prophet  Ezekiel,  would  naturally  create  the 
impression  on  the  mind  of  the  reader  that  the  trade 
was  mainly  in  the  hands  of  the  carrying  tribes. 

It  is  scarcely  possible,  however,  to  conceive  of 
this  being  so,  as  far  as  the  Phoenicians  were  con 
cerned,  for  they  were  absolutely  the  masters  of  this 
trade  at  least  in  the  Mediterranean  basin.  We 
know,  moreover,  that  they  were  as  familiar  with 


44     THE    PHOENICIANS   AND   AMERICA 

the  interior  regions  as  they  were  with  the  main 
cross-country  and  coast  routes,  and  at  a  later  period 
sought  to  secure  better  facilities  for  direct  com 
munication  by  sea  with  Yemen  from  Eziongeber 
with  a  view  to  lessening  the  expense  of  the  long 
overland  journey  (i  Kings  ix.  28). 

It  is  quite  safe,  therefore,  to  conclude  that  while 
the  Phoenicians  encouraged  a  trade  by  barter  with 
the  border  tribes  for  wool,  spices,  gold,  precious 
stones,  and  other  products,  yet  the  great  armed 
caravans  which  periodically  left  Tyre  and  plunged 
into  the  Arabian  Peninsula  could  have  had  no  other 
objective  than  Gerrha  and  Yemen,  where  doubtless 
the  Phoenicians  had  their  own  purchasing  agents 
and  warehouses,  so  as  to  secure  at  first  hand  the 
products  of  these  favoured  regions,  and  also  those 
of  India  and  Ethiopia.  The  more  carefully  the 
subject  is  canvassed  the  more  apparent  does  it 
become  that  the  main  sources  of  supply  for  such 
costly  and  bulky  goods  as  were  produced  from 
Yemen  must  have  been  kept  in  channels  over 
which  the  Phoenicians  had  a  practical  control. 

Moreover,  Arabia  was  one  of  the  largest  countries 
in  the  eastern  world.  It  was  contiguous  to  Phoe 
nicia  and  the  Bahrein  Islands,  while  its  products 
and  markets  were  most  valuable,  for  the  southern 
markets — those  of  Hydramaut  and  Yemen  (which 
in  a  special  sense  may  be  described  as  the  Biblical 
Ophir) — were  the  great  emporiums  of  the  myrrh, 
cassia,  cinnamon,  and  ladanum  trade.  In  addition, 
there  were  the  great  markets  of  Gerrha  on  the  east 
coast,  and  Petra  on  the  northern  boundary  of 
Arabia.  These  seem  to  have  been  mainly  valuable 
as  the  outlet  for  the  Indian,  Ceylon,  and  Persian 


THE    PHOENICIAN    LAND   TRADE       45 

Gulf  trade  and  as  central  emporiums  for  the 
southern  and  interior  markets. 

The  fleeces  of  the  Arabian  sheep  were  even  more 
valuable  to  the  manufacturing  centres  in  Phoenicia 
than  the  rich  products  of  the  south  country  were 
to  its  merchants,  the  heat  of  the  climate  and  con 
tinuous  exposure  to  the  dry  air  rendering  them 
peculiarly  valuable  in  connection  with  the  purple 
trade. 

The  importance  of  Arabia  to  the  Phoenicians 
will  therefore  be  understood.  The  valuable  pro 
ducts  of  this  immense  region  were  in  constant  de 
mand,  the  delicate  and  expensive  fabrics  which 
issued  from  their  dye-vats  and  looms  being  wholly 
dependent  on  the  raw  products  found  there.  It  is 
not  surprising,  therefore,  to  find  that  the  most 
cordial  relations  always  existed  between  the  mer 
chants  of  the  Syrian  coast  towns  and  the  Nomads 
of  the  wilderness,  a  cordiality  that  must  have  been 
enhanced  by  the  knowledge  that  in  the  Phoenician 
markets  could  be  obtained  a  quality  and  style  of 
goods  in  exchange  for  these  raw  products  that 
could  not  be  excelled,  perhaps  not  even  equalled, 
in  any  other  market. 

If,  however,  Arabia  was  the  direction  towards 
which  the  Phoenician  caravans  moved  to  secure 
the  products  of  the  rich,  southern,  and  central 
markets,  Babylonia  was  the  no  less  important  ob 
jective  towards  which  they  moved  in  pursuit  of 
those  of  the  farther  east. 

It  is  unfortunate  that  we  know  less  of  this 
branch  of  Phoenician  commerce  than  any  other, 
yet,  according  to  Herodotus  (i.  i  arid  iii.  113),  it  was 
the  most  ancient.  Whether  the  direct  route  to 


46     THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Babylon  was  at  that  time  via  Thapsacus  and  the 
Euphrates  is  exceedingly  doubtful.  It  certainly 
was  then,  as  it  is  to-day,  the  route  mainly  used  for 
the  heavy  caravan  trade,  tapping  as  it  did  the 
northern  road  leading  to  China,  through  which 
was  obtained  the  products  of  the  farther  Asiatic 
east  and  north. 

All  the  ancient  authorities,  including  the  prophet 
Ezekiel  (xxvii.  20),  speak  of  the  Babylonian  trade 
in  the  most  general  terms.  It  is  difficult,  there 
fore,  to  arrive  at  a  clear  understanding  of  its  nature. 
The  vagueness  may  have  been  caused  by  the  very 
important  character  of  the  Babylonian  markets, 
which  rendered  any  specific  allusion  to  the  trade 
superfluous.  The  erection  of  the  treasure  cities 
Palmyra  and  Baalbek,  which  are  specifically  as 
cribed  to  Solomon  (i  Kings  ix.  18),  shows,  however, 
its  importance,  and  that  a  participation  in  it  entered 
into  the  plans  of  Solomon. 

It  is  quite  probable  that  the  commerce  of  Phoe 
nicia  with  Babylonia  may,  at  a  later  date,  have 
been  conducted  in  some  measure  with  currency 
and  bills  of  exchange,  for  the  Babylonian  mintage 
passed  current  in  Arabia  from  a  very  early  period, 
though,  from  the  political  animosities  that  existed 
between  the  nations  of  the  east  and  west,  it  is 
extremely  doubtful  if,  during  the  period  of  Solomon 
and  Hiram,  the  Babylonian  mintage  passed  current 
with  the  Mediterranean  nations.  Indeed,  if  we 
read  the  prophet  Ezekiel  correctly,  the  trade  of  his 
time,  which  is  usually  placed  about  600  B.C.,  was 
one  of  barter,  pure  and  simple,  an  exchange  of 
commodities  for  commodities,  in  which  even  the 
precious  metals,  gold  and  silver,  passed  as  such.  If 


THE    PHOENICIAN    LAND    TRADE       47 

this  was  the  case,  and  on  this  point  there  is  little 
room  for  doubt,  then  the  Arabic-Babylonian  trade 
must  have  been  enormously  valuable  to  the  Phoe 
nicians,  for  silver  in  the  east  was  a  scarce  metal, 
and  the  mines  of  the  ancient  world  were  mainly  in 
the  hands  of  the  Phoenicians. 

Though  Arabia  is  not  to-day  included  among 
the  gold-producing  countries,  the  testimony  of 
antiquity  as  to  its  position  in  this  respect  is  too 
precise  to  leave  any  room  for  doubt  that  either  by 
washing  or  mining  vast  quantities  of  gold  were 
found,  especially  in  the  rich  southern  pro  vines.  In 
deed  a  reference  in  Judges  (viii.  29)  makes  this  quite 
clear.  It  is  there  stated  that  the  Midianites,  one 
of  the  carrying  tribes,  had  grown  so  opulent  in  this 
business  of  carrying  merchandise,  and  held  gold  in 
so  little  esteem,  that  they  made  not  only  their  own 
articles  of  personal  adornment,  but  even  the  chains 
of  their  camels'  necks  of  the  precious  metal.  If, 
therefore,  Phoenicia  was  the  medium  through  which 
silver  poured  into  the  east,  it  is  easy  to  understand 
the  commanding  position  which  she  quickly  at 
tained  in  the  commerce  of  the  ancient  world,  for 
all  or  practically  all  of  the  silver  mines  were  either 
in  her  possession  or  under  her  control  as  early  as 
1200  B.C. 

The  Edomites,  who  occupied  the  north-eastern 
portion  of  the  Arabian  Peninsula,  were  not  like  the 
Midianites,  a  nomadic  tribe,  but  a  settled  agri 
cultural,  pastoral,  and  commercial  people.  They 
were  in  possession  of  many  cities  and  of  two  ports 
of  considerable  historic  importance,  Eloth  and 
Eziongeber,  which,  there  is  good  reason  to  believe, 
the  Phoenicians  were  permitted  to  use  in  connection 


48      THE    PHOENICIANS   AND   AMERICA 

with  the  Arabian  trade.  As  the  usual  trade  routes 
which  led  from  these  ports  to  Tyre  passed  through 
the  country  of  the  Edomites,  it  is  highly  probable 
that  Petra,  a  mart  of  only  less  importance  than 
Yemen,  was  from  a  very  remote  date  employed  as 
the  distributing  centre  for  the  north-west  regions. 

As  Yemen  served  as  a  mart  for  the  rich  southern 
countries,  especially  those  of  South  Arabia,  India, 
and  the  Ethiopia  coast  adjoining,  where  was 
gathered  the  gold,  precious  stones,  ivory,  frank 
incense  and  slaves  of  these  favoured  regions,  so 
Gerrha  on  the  east  coast  served  as  the  emporium 
for  the  staples  of  India,  Ceylon,  and  the  Persian 
Gulf  generally,  such  as  cinnamon,  spices,  ebony, 
pearls,  precious  stones,  the  horn  of  the  sea  unicorn, 
ivory,  cotton  and  silk.  These  were  conveyed 
thither  by  the  Phoenician  colonists,  the  men  of 
Daden,  who  acted  as  intermediaries  in  the  trade 
between  the  farther  east  and  the  Syrian  coast. 

Regular  caravans  were  formed  at  Gerrha  which 
journeyed  through  the  desert,  bringing  back  the 
manufactured  wares  of  Tyre  and  Sidon,  which 
were  in  turn  carried  by  caravan  to  the  southern 
provinces,  or  by  vessel  to  India,  Ceylon,  and  the 
Golden  Chersonese.  Whether  the  northern  cara 
vans  went  by  Salema  and  Thema  to  Aclama  at  the 
head  of  the  Red  Sea,  as  the  words  of  the  prophet 
Isaiah  (xxi.  13)  seem  to  indicate,  or  took  the  more 
northerly  route  by  Coromanis  to  Petra,  which 
seems  equally  probable,  it  is  impossible  to  determine 
accurately.  Probably  both  routes  were  much  used, 
but  from  what  we  have  already  outlined,  with  re 
spect  to  the  course  of  the  Arabian  trade,  it  would  be 
useless  to  pursue  the  investigation  further.  Whether 


THE    PHOENICIAN    LAND    TRADE      49 

we  view  the  trade  as  being  confined  to  one  or  as 
embracing  both  of  these  channels,  it  should  be 
clear  that  the  Phoenicians  had  a  larger  vested  in 
terest  in  the  Arabian  and  Ophir  markets  than  any 
other  nation  of  antiquity. 

The  distance *  from  Yemen  to  Petra,  on  the 
borders  of  Palestine,  was  1260  geographical  miles, 
which  meant  a  caravan  journey  of  seventy  days. 
This  route  seems  to  have  been  along  the  borders  of 
the  Red  Sea,  passing  through  the  towns  of  Macoraba 
or  Mecca,  Satripa,  and  Medina,  the  present  terminus 
of  the  railroad  from  the  Mediterranean.  For  a 
considerable  portion  of  the  way  the  route  was 
through  one  of  the  most  fertile  regions  of  Arabia, 
where  at  regular  halting-places  accessions  from  the 
interior  towns  mentioned  by  Ptolemy  were  received, 
which  swelled  the  cavalcade  and  made  the  convoy 
of  an  armed  guard  necessary. 

With  regard  to  the  caravan  routes  from  the  east 
coast  we  have  less  positive  information.  Gerrha 
was  the  objective,  as  it  was  there  that  the  products 
of  the  eastern  interior  and  south-east  coasts,  also 
those  of  India  south  of  the  Ganges  and  Ceylon,  were 
gathered  for  further  transportation.  One  road 
seems  to  have  followed  the  coast-line  through  the 
province  of  Oman  to  Hydramaut,  but  the  main 
road  ran  directly  through  the  desert  direct  to 
Yemen,  distant  as  the  crow  flies  about  700 
miles. 

From  Gerrha 2  to  Phoenicia  the  road  debouched 
at  Petra  and  Aclama,  but  it  is  possible  that  a  direct 
road  by  a  route  not  now  known  passed  in  a  north 
westerly  direction  through  the  desert  from  the 

1  Heeren,  vol.  i.  p.  356.  *  Ibid.,  vol.  i.  p.  357. 

D 


50     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Persian  Gulf  port  to  Tyre.  Indeed  the  reading  of 
Isaiah  xxi.  13  seems  to  indicate  as  much. 

It  was  out  of  the  South  Arabian  trade  that 
Petra  grew  into  such  importance  as  to  give  its  name 
to  the  whole  north-western  territory.  Even  in 
Phoenician  times  Petra  seems  to  have  been  a  central 
mart  of  great  importance,  not  only  for  the  produce 
of  Central  and  South  Arabia,  but  also  for  the  wool 
of  the  desert. 

From  what  has  now  been  stated,  it  should  be 
clear  that  Arabia  was  the  great  seat  of  the  Phoe 
nician  land  trade,  and  that  in  consequence  of  its 
geographical  position  and  also  the  magnitude  of 
the  operations  carried  on  there,  the  Phoenicians  were 
in  a  position  to  handle  its  products  in  a  way  possible 
to  no  other  nation  of  the  ancient  world.  It  is  also 
clear  that  with  this  trade  there  was  interwoven  an 
intimate  connection  with  that  of  those  other  rich 
countries,  Ethiopia  and  India. 

Whether  the  Phoenicians  prosecuted  this  busi 
ness  with  their  own  caravans  or  not  we  have  no 
means  of  determining.  But  their  well-known  policy 
of  reaching  the  markets  with  which  they  did  busi 
ness  directly,  points  clearly  in  this  direction.  Under 
any  circumstance  caravans  composed  of  the  various 
Nomad  tribesmen  were  regularly  hired  by  the 
Phoenician  merchants,  which  penetrated  the  Penin 
sula  in  every  direction,  carrying  the  wares  of  the 
coast  towns  and  bringing  back  the  produce  of  Ophir 
to  the  Phoenician  ports,  which  ultimately  became 
the  great  centre  from  which  they  were  shipped 
either  in  their  raw  or  manufactured  condition  to 
every  land  with  which  Phoenicia  had  established 
trade  relations. 


THE    PHCENICIAN    LAND    TRADE       51 

That  we  have  so  very  little  direct  testimony 
with  respect  to  this  absorbing  topic  of  the  Arabian 
trade  and  the  methods  pursued  by  the  Phoenicians 
in  its  prosecution  and  control,  need  occasion  no 
surprise,  for,  being  a  trade  of  barter  pure  and 
simple,  it  must  have  been  immensely  profitable  to 
these  astute  sons  of  Canaan,  who  would  have  every 
reason  for  throwing  a  view  of  mysterious  secrecy 
over  the  region.  That  water  communication  ex 
isted  between  some  of  the  ports  in  South  Arabia 
and  those  at  the  head  of  the  Red  Sea  there  can  be 
no  question,  for  definite  reference  is  made  by  ancient 
authorities  to  the  spice  trade  with  the  Egyptian 
port  of  Hieropolis,  which  points  clearly  to  the  ex 
istence  of  a  similar  trade  between  Yemen  and 
Eziongeber,  the  Phoenician  and  Egyptian  markets 
being  those  on  which  the  Edomites  depended  for 
the  disposal  of  their  produce. 

It  is  extremely  probable,  therefore,  that  the 
Edomites  equally  with  the  Egyptians  would  have 
been  willing  to  throw  their  ports  open  to  Phoenician 
shipping,  though  probably  enough  not  on  such 
favourable  terms  as  they  accorded  to  their  own 
shipping  employed  in  the  South  Arabian  trade. 
All  doubt  on  the  point  seems  indeed  to  be  removed 
by  the  specific  statement  of  Scripture  (i  Kings  ix. 
27)  that  "  Hiram  sent  in  the  ships  of  Solomon 
shipmen  that  had  knowledge  of  the  sea/'  The 
Phoenician  trade  between  Yemen  and  the  ports  at 
the  head  of  the  Red  Sea  seems  therefore  to  be 
assured. 

While  all  that  has  been  written  above  is  neces 
sary  to  an  intelligent  understanding  of  the  case, 
it  will  nevertheless  considerably  reduce  the  com- 


52     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

plexities  of  the  problem  with  which  we  are  wrest 
ling,  if  we  simply  remember  that,  either  by  ship  or 
caravan,  the  principal  marts  of  Arabia,  those  of 
Yemen  in  the  south,  Gerrha  in  the  east,  and  Petra 
in  the  north,  poured  a  steady  stream  of  merchan 
dise  into  Babylonia,  Egypt,  and  Phoenicia,  though 
during  the  eleventh  century  B.C.  mainly  into  Phoe 
nicia,  which  was  then  the  great  distributing  nation 
of  the  ancient  world. 

The  route  from  Petra  to  Babylon  is  represented 
as  running  due  east  to  Thapsacus  on  the  Euphrates, 
whence  it  followed  the  course  of  the  river  to  its 
objective.  That  from  Gerrha  seems  to  have  followed 
the  coast-line  to  Oman  and  Hydramaut,  but  a  direct 
route  through  the  desert  is  said  to  have  connected 
both  Hydramaut  and  Yemen.  It  was,  however, 
through  an  inhospitable  region,  and  was  only 
followed  because  of  the  immense  saving  in  time  and 
distance.  Yemen  by  this  route  was  only  about 
700  miles  distant  from  Gerrha,  the  journey  occupy 
ing  a  period  of  not  more  than  forty  days  in  its 
prosecution  (Heeren,  Hist.  Research,  vol.  i.  p.  356). 

In  view  of  what  has  been  said,  it  should  there 
fore  be  unnecessary  to  adduce  further  proof  with  a 
view  to  it  being  made  clear  that  the  Arabian 
Peninsula  was  a  territory  with  which  the  Phoe 
nicians  were  intimately  familiar  from  a  very  early 
date,  and  that  long  prior  to  the  twelfth  century  B.C. 
the  produce  of  Yemen,  Hydramaut,  and  Oman  was 
carried  to  Gerrha  and  Petra  en  route  to  Tyre,  not 
more  than  three  months  being  necessary  to  place 
in  the  Phoenician  cities  the  products  of  Ophir 
gathered  in  the  emporia  of  these  southern  pro 
vinces.  Tyre,  moreover,  lay  only  about  350  miles 


THE    PHOENICIAN    LAND    TRADE       53 

in  a  direct  line  north  of  Petra,  so  that  if  all  necessary 
allowances  were  made  for  stoppages  at  the  various 
halting-places  the  return  journey  from  Tyre  to 
Yemen  could  be  comfortably  made  in  nine  months. 

However  we  may  view  this  question  of  trans 
port,  one  thing  seems  clear,  namely,  that  by  their 
long  residence  on  the  Persian  Gulf  and  the  magni 
tude  of  their  transactions  after  the  transference  of 
their  main  establishments  to  the  Mediterranean, 
the  Phoenicians  acquired  a  familiarity  with  the  re 
sources  and  trade  routes  of  the  Arabian  Peninsula 
possessed  by  no  other  nation  of  antiquity. 

The  carrying  trade  of  the  world  was  mainly 
centred  in  Phoenicia  certainly  not  later  than  the 
twelfth  century  B.C.  It  was  connected  by  road 
and  caravan  with  Arabia  and  the  Persian  Gulf,  the 
Euphrates,  Armenia,  Cappadocia,  and  Antolia,  and 
by  sea  with  Asia  Minor,  the  Greek  Archipelago, 
Egypt,  Italy,  North  Africa,  Spain,  and  very 
probably  with  Madeira,  Britain,  and  the  Baltic. 

With  respect  to  the  western  expansion  at  this 
date,  it  will  be  prudent  to  say  a  few  words  before 
leaving  this  phase  of  our  inquiry.  Gades,  the  great 
Phoenician  emporium  on  the  Atlantic  for  the 
western  trade,  is  said  to  have  been  founded  at  the 
same  time  as  Utica,  the  emporium  of  the  Phoe 
nicians  on  the  African  coast,  and  as  the  foundation 
of  Utica  took  place  270  years  before  Carthage,  the 
foundation  of  Gades  must  have  taken  place  noo 
years  before  the  Christian  era,  or  about  100  years 
after  the  Trojan  war.  If,  therefore,  we  make 
allowance  for  considerable  developments  on  the 
Spanish  Peninsula  before  the  erection  of  this  city 
on  the  Atlantic  coast,  we  may  fairly  enough  assume 


54     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

that  the  phenomenal  progress  in  naval  construction, 
to  which  we  referred  in  connection  with  the  recon 
struction  of  Tyre  and  the  enlargement  of  its  har 
bours  fifty  years  after  this  date,  can  only  be  viewed 
as  measures  compelled  by  the  great  developments 
on  the  Spanish  Peninsula  and  the  increasing  trade 
with  the  west  generally. 

That  the  phenomenal  developments  in  naval 
construction  and  navigation  among  the  Phoenicians 
belong  to  this  period  there  can  be  no  question,  for 
both  science  and  art  seem  to  have  been  called  into 
active  co-operation  in  the  creation  of  the  great  ships 
of  Tharshish,  which  are  usually  identified  with  this 
period.  The  whereabouts  of  Tharshish,  like  that 
of  Ophir,  has  given  rise  to  much  discussion.  In 
Genesis  x.  4  the  name  is  there  identified  with  one 
of  the  sons  of  Javan,  who  is  to  have  settled  with 
his  descendants  in  Southern  Italy.  The  name, 
however,  seems  in  time — like  that  of  Ophir — to 
have  become  displaced,  and  as  the  trade  of  the 
Phoenicians  moved  westward,  it  moved  with  the 
trade  until  in  course  of  time  it  came  to  be  applied 
in  a  general  way  to  the  whole  region  bounded  by 
the  inland  sea  to  the  west.  The  name  Tharshish 
seems  never  to  have  been  very  definite  in  its  appli 
cation.  To  the  Jewish  mind  in  later  years  it  appears 
to  have  been  particularly  associated  with  the  name 
of  a  region  rich  in  silver.  It  is  therefore  not  difficult 
to  understand  how  in  Holy  Writ  we  have  reference 
to  an  eastern  as  well  as  a  western  Tharshish,  and 
this  the  more  that  the  ships  employed  in  the  prose 
cution  of  this  particular  business  in  both  directions 
were  ships  of  Tharshish  (i  Kings  x.  22,  and  2  Chron. 
xx.  36). 


CHAPTER    III 

NAVIGATION   AND    SEA  TRADE 

Extent  of  the  Phoenician  marine — Causes  of  its  remarkable  develop 
ment—Nature  of  early  voyages — Phoenician  policy  non-aggressive 
— First  Phoenician  colonial  settlements — The  ships  of  Tharshish — 
Their  testimony  to  Phoenician  seamanship — Trade  monopoly  in 
the  Eastern  Mediterranean — Also  I  in  the  Atlantic — Xenophon's 
description  of  a  Phoenician  armed  merchant-ship — Phoenicians  pre 
eminent  as  shipbuilders  and  navigators. 

STUPENDOUS  as  the  land  operations  of  the  Phoe 
nicians  were  they  were  as  nothing  compared  with 
their  sea  trade,  with  which  indeed  their  chief  fame 
will  always  be  identified.  To  the  beginnings  of 
this  sea  trade  we  have  already  referred  in  dealing 
with  the  causes  which  led  to  the  selection  of  the 
Bahrein  Islands  as  a  centre  from  which  to  control 
the  Arabico-Babylonian  trade. 

Subject  as  their  emporia  on  the  lower  waters 
of  the  Euphrates  were  to  the  periodic  raids  of  the 
predatory  tribes  that  swept  over  the  Mesopotamian 
plains  from  the  north,  and  harassed  in  their  busi 
ness  operations  by  the  conflicting  interests  of  the 
great  monarchies  that  grew  up  in  Babylonia,  the 
Phoenicians  found  very  early  that  not  only  travel 
but  trade  could  be  conducted  more  securely  and 
cheaply  by  sea  than  by  land.  In  so  doing  they 
solved  the  one  great  problem  of  commerce  and 
became  the  foremost  intermediaries  of  the  ancient 
world. 

The  centres  of  trade  and  manufacture  at  that 

55 


56      THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

period  were  mainly  confined  to  Babylonia,  Arabia, 
India,  and  Egypt,  and  as  these  countries  were 
separated  from  one  another  by  immense  deserts 
or  stretches  of  sea,  whoever  was  in  a  position  to 
control  the  carrying  trade  between  them  and  the 
outlying  territories  was  necessarily  mistress  of  the 
commerce  of  the  ancient  world,  and  had  the  right 
to  dictate  on  practically  her  own  terms  the  rate 
of  exchange  on  such  commodities  as  were  handled. 
The  astute  and  enterprising  sons  of  Canaan 
seized  the  opportunity  thus  presented,  and  in  a 
short  time  became  factors  of  the  first  importance 
in  distributing  to  the  outskirts  of  the  known  world 
the  products  and  manufactures  of  the  more  favoured 
and  densely  populated  regions  as  well  as  those 
riper  fruits  of  civilisation  that  blossomed  in  the 
centres  of  wealth,  culture,  and  refinement.  Thus 
they  brought  within  the  range  of  their  influence 
practically  every  centre  of  population,  civilised 
and  uncivilised,  known  to  the  ancient  world. 

During  the  historic  period  the  navigation  of  the 
seas  was  confined  to  the  Persian  and  Arabian 
Gulfs,  the  Indian  Ocean  as  far  as  Ceylon,  and  the 
coasts  of  the  Deccan.  There  is  good  reason  for 
believing  that  it  may  even  have  reached  the  mouth 
of  the  Ganges.  Some  doubt  has  been  expressed  as 
to  the  practicability  of  voyages  to  the  more  distant 
of  these  regions  at  an  early  period,  but  this  doubt 
seems  scarcely  reasonable  when  we  admit  the 
existence  of  a  Red  Sea  navigation  (i  Kings  ix.  27) 
of  the  most  extensive  character  in  the  eleventh 
century  B.C. 

There  were,  moreover,  various  circumstances 
which  contributed  to  the  development  of  this  naviga- 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA    TRADE        57 

tion,  for  none  of  the  voyages  need  have  been  more 
than  mere  coasting  expeditions,  the  straits  of  Ormus 
at  the  mouth  of  the  Persian  Gulf  and  those  of  Babel- 
mandeb  at  the  entrance  to  the  Red  Sea  reducing 
the  distance  from  Arabia  to  India  and  from  Arabia 
to  Ethiopia  to  a  negligible  quantity.  Again,  the 
directions  of  the  periodic  monsoons  in  the  Indian 
Ocean,  which  are  very  similar  to  those  prevailing 
in  the  Persian  and  Arabian  Gulfs,  were  peculiarly 
favourable  to  voyages  made  to  and  from  India  and 
Ceylon,  the  Arabian  Peninsula  and  the  Ethiopian 
mainland. 

Once  embarked  on  this  business,  even  in  a  small 
way,  the  advantages  of  sea  over  land  transporta 
tion,  in  respect  to  the  territory  which  was  thereby 
made  tributary  to  the  establishments  of  the  Phoe 
nicians,  would,  apart  from  all  other  considerations, 
have  provided  a  sufficient  justification  for  its 
adoption  as  a  certain  means  of  securing  that  mono 
poly  in  trade  on  which  their  profits  depended. 
And  this  the  more  so  that  the  provinces  of  Hydra- 
maut  and  Yemen,  in  which  were  situated  the  great 
central  marts  for  the  gold,  precious  stones,  spices, 
and  frankincense  of  Arabia,  the  rich  products  of 
India  and  Ceylon,  and  the  equally  valuable  mer 
chandise  of  Ethiopia,  were  easily  reached  by  means 
of  mere  coasting  voyages  over  a  comparatively 
smooth  sea,  whereas  the  land  journey,  as  we  have 
shown,  was  through  an  inhospitable  desert. 

If,  however,  a  controlling  interest  in  the  produce 
of  the  Indian  and  Arabian  markets  was  the  magnet 
which  drew  the  Phoenicians  to  the  Bahrein  Islands, 
and  there  can  be  little  doubt  that  it  was,  it  is  quite 
certain  that  they  did  not  long  rest  satisfied  with  the 


58     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

commercial  leverage  which  they  obtained  over  the 
Persian  Gulf.  There  is  very  clear  evidence  that 
their  navigation  was  not  confined  to  these  waters, 
but  at  a  very  early  period  embraced  the  southern 
boundaries  of  the  Arabian  Peninsula,  and  probably 
extended  to  the  borders  of  Egypt.  Theophrastus 
in  his  History  of  Plants,  when  speaking  of  the 
frankincense  trade,  mentions  the  port  of  Hierapolis, 
the  present  Suez,  as  much  used  in  connection  with 
this  business.  The  magnitude  of  the  transactions 
of  the  Phoenicians  in  the  southern  markets  must 
have  placed  them  in  a  peculiarly  favourable  position 
for  securing  such  shipping  and  warehouse  facilities 
in  the  ports  of  Hydramaut  and  Yemen  as  the  exi 
gencies  of  their  business  demanded.  If,  therefore, 
the  Phoenician  trade  between  Yemen  and  Egypt 
cannot  from  positive  historic  testimony  be  affirmed, 
it  can  at  least  be  reasonably  enough  assumed. 
With  the  route  and  the  value  of  the  trade  the 
Phoenicians  seem  to  have  been  familiar  from  the 
beginning,  so  much  so  that  they  lost  no  time  in 
making  overtures  to  the  Jews  for  the  transference 
to  their  own  control  of  the  two  ports  of  Eloth  and 
Eziongeber  on  the  ^Elantic  Gulf,  when  the  practical 
extermination  of  the  Edomites  provided  an  opening 
for  a  more  complete  control  of  the  Ophir  trade 
(i  Chron.  xviii.  12,  I  Kings  ix.  27). 

The  reason  for  the  development  of  the  Red  Sea 
navigation  can  be  easily  understood.  The  Egyptian 
markets  could  only  be  supplied  with  the  products 
of  Ophir,  either  by  direct  communication  with  the 
southern  emporia  by  caravan  or  ship,  or  through 
Gerrha  and  the  Phoenician  headquarters  on  the 
Persian  Gulf.  The  advantage  of  sea  transport 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA    TRADE        59 

from  Yemen  was,  however,  so  apparent  that,  as 
we  have  seen,  it  led  to  the  transference  of  the 
Phoenician  headquarters  to  the  Bahrein  Islands. 
As  a  means  of  controlling  the  Egyptian  markets  it 
would  have  been  as  effective  as  in  the  case  of  the 
Babylonian,  so  that  it  is  unnecessary  to  suppose 
any  other  reason  than  a  desire  to  facilitate  this  trade 
with  the  south  Arabian  ports  in  order  to  under 
stand  the  easy  and  continuous  access  which  the 
Phoenicians  enjoyed  to  the  port  of  Hierapolis,  and, 
in  all  probability,  to  those  of  Yemen  and  Hydra- 
maut. 

There  can  be  no  doubt  that  it  was  the  recogni 
tion  of  the  strategic  importance  of  the  Bahrein 
Islands  as  a  central  emporium  for  the  great  markets 
of  the  ancient  world  that  led  the  Phoenicians  to 
establish  their  first  settlements  there.  This  view 
is  not  dependent  on  a  recognition  of  the  nature  and 
origin  of  the  architectural  remains  found  there,  but 
receives  the  strongest  possible  confirmative  support 
in  the  fact  that  all  the  early  trade  routes  which 
honeycombed  the  Arabian  Peninsula,  routes  which 
have  undergone  no  change,  always  found  their 
outlet  at  the  Bay  of  Gerrha,  opposite  to  the  site  of 
Phoenicia's  first  warehouses.  The  erection  of  the 
early  Phoenician  emporia  on  the  Bahrein  Islands 
was,  therefore,  an  act  of  rare  sagacity.  It  placed 
the  Phoenicians  in  an  unrivalled  position  to  divert 
into  such  channels  as  the  exigencies  of  their  com 
mercial  enterprises  might  demand,  not  only  the 
produce  tributary  to  the  Persian  Gulf,  but  equally 
that  which  found  its  natural  outlet  at  the  Red  Sea. 
That  a  trade  existed  between  Yemen  and  Egypt 
there  can  be  no  question  (Asiat.  Res.,  vol.  iii.  p.  324). 


60     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

It  is  more  than  probable  that  it  extended  to  the 
Persian  Gulf  ports  at  an  early  period,  because  at  a 
later  date  it  was  shared  in  by  the  Chaldaeans. 
Moreover,  the  mere  fact  that  the  Phoenicians  seized 
the  opportunity  presented  by  their  political  and 
commercial  affiliations  with  the  Jews  to  secure  a 
port  under  their  own  control  on  the  Red  Sea  in 
place  of  one  under  foreign  espionage,  seems  to 
indicate  that  they  were  already  familiar  with  the 
navigation,  which  again  implies  that  they  were  to 
some  extent  at  least  in  possession  of  the  trade,  and 
were  desirous  of  further  developing  it. 

It  will,  moreover,  be  seen  that  the  ports  of  the 
Phoenicians  at  Tylos  and  Arados  were  admirably 
situated  for  handling  by  sea  the  trade  of  Arabia 
and  India  with  Babylonia,  and  that  of  Babylonia 
with  India  and  Arabia,  at  a  tithe  of  the  expense 
which  such  journeys  would  have  entailed  by  cara 
van  transport.  The  position  placed  them  in  an 
equally  advantageous  position  with  respect  to  the 
Egyptian  trade.  This  view  provides  an  adequate 
explanation  of  the  early  navigating  skill  of  the 
inhabitants  of  the  Arabian  Peninsula,  and  of  their 
possessing  in  connection  with  this  navigation,  as  we 
shall  have  occasion  to  show  later,  the  bactellium  or 
loadstone  which  only  could  have  come  to  them 
through  Phoenician  sources. 

The  trade  with  the  Arabian  Peninsula  must 
likewise  have  been  greatly  facilitated  by  reason  of 
the  similarity  of  the  languages  of  the  two  peoples 
(Heeren,  p.  360),  for  they  were  of  the  same  Semitic 
stock.  Even  in  later  times  the  language  of  Phoe 
nicia  and  of  Arabia  were  so  similar  that  they  could 
be  described  as  two  dialects  of  the  same  speech. 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA    TRADE        61 

This  advantage  alone  would  have  been  sufficient 
to  have  secured  them  a  predominant  influence  in 
the  commerce  of  Arabia,  even  if  the  situation  of 
their  emporia  and  their  possession  of  the  sea 
transport  had  not  rendered  it  practically  impossible 
for  any  other  nation  to  compete  with  them. 

It  is  only  in  this  way  that  it  is  possible  to  come 
to  an  intelligent  understanding  of  the  opening 
chapter  of  the  first  book  of  Herodotus,  where  is 
indicated  the  existence  of  a  considerable  trade  on 
the  part  of  the  Phoenicians  with  the  Assyrian  and 
Egyptian  markets.  Nor  is  this  familiarity  with 
these  markets  surprising,  because  the  population 
of  the  Nile  valley,  as  has  been  shown,  was  for  at 
least  six  centuries  part  and  parcel  of  Phoenician 
civilisation,  being  either  the  mainstay  of  the  Hyksos 
invasion  or  those  driven  to  the  eastern  shores  of 
the  Persian  Gulf.  The  civilisation  of  Egypt  was, 
moreover,  one  of  the  most  ancient,  and  as  it  had 
always  enjoyed  the  principal  river  and  land  traffic 
of  Africa  it  would  have  been  passing  strange  if  no 
intercourse  had  existed  between  two  such  distinc 
tively  commercial  peoples  as  the  traders  of  the 
Bahrein  Islands  and  the  Egyptians.  Indeed  it  is 
only  by  assuming  the  existence  of  such  a  trade  at 
a  very  early  period  that  we  can  understand  how  it 
came  about  that  after  the  expulsion  of  the  Hyksos 
and  the  doors  of  Egypt  were  double  barred  against 
the  entrance  of  all  foreigners,  especially  Semitics, 
the  Phoenicians  were  permitted  to  retain  their 
residence  in  the  old  Hyksos  capital  at  Memphis. 

From  the  beginning  it  must  have  been  apparent 
to  the  Egyptians  that  the  territorial  aggrandise 
ment  was  no  part  of  the  policy  of  the  Phoenicians, 


62       THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

who  established  themselves  within  their  boundaries 
and  brought  to  their  doors  the  products  of  Baby 
lonia  and  the  wealth  of  Ophir,  as  well  as  relieved 
them  of  the  surplus  products  of  their  cotton  and 
linen  looms,  and  those  masterpieces  of  art,  the 
embroideries  of  cotton  on  cotton,  which  were  so 
highly  valued  throughout  the  ancient  world.  If, 
however,  the  naval  emporia  at  the  Bahrein  Islands 
were  in  the  beginning  the  key  to  the  Baby 
lonian,  Arabian,  and  Egyptian  trade,  it  is  clear  that 
there  must  have  come  a  time  when  the  success  of 
the  traders  of  Tylus  and  Arados  in  controlling  these 
markets  must  have  created  a  spirit  of  irritation  in 
both  Egypt  and  Babylonia,  probably  even  among 
the  carrying  tribes  of  Arabia.  To  what  extent 
business  rivalry  may  have  influenced  the  removal 
of  the  Phoenicians  to  the  Mediterranean  and  their 
beginning  there  a  new  career  as  a  manufacturing  as 
well  as  a  commercial  nation  cannot  be  determined. 
All  the  probabilities,  however,  are  in  favour  of  the 
view  that  if  it  affected  the  movement  it  was  only 
in  a  minor  degree.  But  there  were  more  important 
influences  at  work  calculated  to  produce  this  result, 
namely,  the  discovery  on  the  one  hand  of  the  un 
rivalled  dye  to  be  obtained  from  the  purple-produc 
ing  murex  on  the  Syrian  coasts,  and  on  the  other 
the  discovery  of  the  Eldorado  in  the  silver  mines 
of  Spain,  the  tin  mines  of  England,  and  probably 
the  amber  of  the  Baltic. 

It  is  unnecessary  to  suppose  that  any  political 
upheaval  operated  to  bring  about  the  change  of 
base  for  the  Phoenician  establishments.  Ordinary 
business  prudence  would  have  dictated  such  a 
policy,  more  especially  as  the  increasing  competition 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA    TRADE        63 

of  the  carrying  tribes  in  the  southern  markets  must 
have  made  it  apparent  that  the  trade  between 
Yemen  and  India  with  Babylonia  could  not  much 
longer  remain  a  monopoly  in  their  hands,  whereas 
in  the  new  territory,  as  the  only  navigating  people 
of  the  ancient  world,  they  had  it  in  their  power  to 
block  in  the  most  effective  manner  any  attempt 
on  the  part  of  their  eastern  competitors  to  secure 
a  participation  in  the  western  trade.  Moreover, 
the  west  at  this  period  was  not  what  it  had  been 
at  the  beginning  of  the  Phoenician  career,  simply 
Egypt  or  the  Syrian  coasts,  for  these  migratory 
movements  from  the  further  east  had  covered  the 
islands  and  shores  of  the  inland  seas  with  settle 
ments  which,  in  many  cases,  had  grown  into  popu 
lous  communities,  thus  offering  the  widest  scope 
for  the  mercantile  proclivities  of  the  traders  of  the 
Bahrein  Islands. 

It  requires  no  special  sagacity,  therefore,  to 
recognise  the  causes  which  led  to  the  change  of  base, 
and  at  the  same  time  to  the  remarkable  develop 
ments  in  Phoenician  naval  construction  and  navi 
gation.  On  the  Syrian  coast  the  durable  cedars 
of  Lebanon  were  substituted  for  the  teaks  of  the 
Persian  Gulf,  and  the  placid  waters  of  the  eastern 
seas  were  exchanged  for  the  turbulent  and  stormy 
waters  that  washed  the  shores  of  the  Mediterranean. 

It  is  true  that  we  have  no  historic  record  showing 
the  stage  to  which  the  Phoenicians  carried  their  navi 
gation  either  on  the  Persian  Gulf  or  the  Red  Sea 
further  than  can  be  drawn  from  our  knowledge  of 
their  trade  with  India,  Arabia,  and  Egypt.  If, 
however,  we  even  confine  it  to  these  seas  and  read 
the  story  in  the  light  of  their  exploits  immediately 


64      THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

on  their  arrival  on  the  Mediterranean,  it  will  be 
apparent  that  both  shipbuilding  and  seamanship 
must,  in  their  hands,  have  passed  far  beyond  the 
primitive  stages  before  they  left  the  Bahrein  Islands. 
Otherwise  the  statement  of  Herodotus  that,  im 
mediately  on  their  arrival  on  the  Mediterranean, 
they  forthwith  applied  themselves  to  such  distant 
navigation  as  that  of  the  Argolic  coasts  would  be 
wholly  incomprehensible.  This  statement  is  too  pre 
cise  to  leave  any  room  for  doubt  as  to  the  meaning 
which  Herodotus  intended  to  convey,  for  Nauplia, 
which  was  always  the  main  port  on  the  Argolic 
coast,  was  distant  as  the  crow  flies  some  700  miles 
from  the  Phoenician  coasts,  and  could  only  be 
reached  by  navigating  the  Levant,  whose  gales  at 
certain  seasons  are  as  much  dreaded  as  any  that 
blow. 

These  early  voyages  on  the  Mediterranean  were 
in  no  sense  coasting  voyages,  nor  were  they  con 
ducted  by  novices  in  the  art,  but  by  seasoned  and 
experienced  seamen.  It  is  curious  that  this  fact 
should  so  far  have  escaped  the  observation  of  all 
writers  on  the  subject  of  Phoenician  navigation,  for 
Herodotus,  in  his  account  of  this  memorable  voyage 
to  the  Argolic  coast,  says  distinctly  that  after  the 
completion  of  their  business  "  they  immediately  set 
sail  for  Egypt/'  Now,  as  Egypt  lay  800  miles  due 
south  of  Argos,  a  coasting  voyage  was  plainly  out 
of  the  question. 

Whether  the  entire  transference  of  the  early 
navigators  from  the  Persian  Gulf  to  the  Syrian  sea 
board  occupied  a  few  years  or  a  few  centuries 
cannot  be  stated,  but  at  all  events  it  led  to  great 
developments  in  Phoenician  naval  construction  and 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA    TRADE        65 

navigation.  During  no  portion  of  their  career 
could  the  navigation  from  the  Persian  Gulf  have 
reached  beyond  30°  north  or  south  of  the  equator. 
For  even  if  at  this  point  we  admit,  with  a  view  to 
clarifying  the  situation,  the  possibility  of  an  Ameri 
can  discovery,  certainly  all  of  the  region  occupied 
by  the  early  civilised  states  of  Central  America  lay 
between  these  latitudes,  and  during  the  season  of 
navigation  was  well  defined  to  the  ancients  by  the 
rise  and  setting  of  the  Pleiades,  which  the  Phoe 
nicians  were  the  first  people  to  put  to  a  practical 
use. 

The  situation  of  the  new  home  of  the  Phoeni 
cians  on  the  Mediterranean  placed  them  abreast  of 
problems  in  navigation  of  a  very  different  character 
from  those  with  which  they  had  been  accustomed 
to  wrestle  on  the  Persian  Gulf.  The  real  perplexities 
of  navigation  only  begin  when  35°  north  or  south 
latitude  have  been  reached,  and  the  major  portion 
of  the  Mediterranean,  including  Asia  Minor,  Greece, 
Sicily,  Italy,  North  Africa,  Spain,  the  Levantine 
and  Adriatic  seas,  the  Straits  of  Hercules,  and  the 
major  portion  of  the  Atlantic  in  which  the  main 
trend  of  their  commerce  lay,  was  beyond  these 
latitudes,  so  that  all  the  skill  the  shipbuilders, 
navigators,  and  scientists  of  Phoenicia  possessed 
must  have  been  called  into  play. 

Here,  therefore,  on  the  shores  of  this  sea  of 
"  the  setting  sun/'  in  this  virgin  territory,  where 
transportation  was  largely  reduced  to  terms  of  their 
own  choosing,  where  from  its  very  situation  they 
were  for  centuries  protected  from  competition,  the 
Phoenicians  secured  a  complete  monopoly  of  the 
Mediterranean  and  Atlantic  trade  and  became  a 

E 


66       THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

'*  merchant  of  the  people  for  many  isles  "  (Ezek. 
xxvii.  3).  At  the  beginning  of  the  thirteenth 
century  B.C.  a  great  commercial  and  navigating 
nation,  capable  and  aggressive  beyond  all  others, 
occupied  the  Phoenician  coasts.  For  many  cen 
turies  it  was  the  good  fortune  of  these  pioneers  to 
enjoy  an  entire  monopoly  of  the  trade.  But 
scarcely  fifty  years  had  passed  after  the  close  of 
the  Trojan  war  before  the  Greek  tribes,  owing  to 
the  influx  of  a  mixed  population  from  the  north, 
were  thrown  into  violent  confusion.  This  resulted 
in  the  displacement  of  large  masses  of  population, 
who,  spreading  themselves  over  the  adjacent  coasts 
and  islands,  so  increased  the  boundaries  of  Greece 
that  it  soon  came  to  embrace  many  of  those  choice 
and  delightful  districts  of  the  eastern  Mediterranean 
that  from  a  high  antiquity  had  been  colonised  by 
the  Phoenicians. 

As  a  commercial  people  it  was,  as  has  been 
pointed  out,  a  fixed  policy  of  the  Phoenicians  to 
avoid  as  far  as  possible  all  occasions  of  friction  with 
the  various  peoples  with  whom  they  established 
business  relations.  Accordingly,  when  towards  the 
beginning  of  the  eleventh  century  B.C.  the  jealousy 
of  the  Pelasgic  states,  which  had  been  steadily 
growing  in  importance,  threatened  to  precipitate 
conflict,  the  Phoenicians  ceded  voluntarily  many 
favoured  regions  which  for  long  had  remained 
within  the  sphere  of  their  influence.  This  policy 
was  rendered  easier  of  accomplishment  in  that 
prior  to  this  date  they  had  already  pushed  into 
the  western  Mediterranean,  and  ere  long  the 
tin  mines  of  the  Cassiterides  and  Britain  and 
the  fossilised  resin  or  amber  of  the  Baltic 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA   TRADE        67 

were  to  become  important  factors  in  Phoenician 
commerce. 

With  rare  good  judgment,  therefore,  the  Phoe 
nicians  transferred  their  activities  to  a  region  where 
they  enjoyed  a  complete  monopoly  in  place  of  dis 
puting  for  merely  sentimental  reasons  the  possession 
of  a  territory  where  profits  would  necessarily  have 
been  rendered  precarious  by  competition.  More 
over,  under  any  circumstance  the  Greeks  would 
still  be  forced  to  purchase  in  the  markets  of  Tyre 
and  Sidon  those  goods  of  finer  grade  which  could 
not  be  obtained  elsewhere. 

The  coasts  of  the  Mediterranean  most  celebrated 
for  the  murex  fishing  were,  as  we  have  shown,  those 
of  Phoenicia,  Asia  Minor,  the  Peloponnesus,  and 
Sicily.  Only  less  valuable,  however,  were  the 
fisheries  on  the  western  Mediterranean  and  on  the 
Atlantic  coasts,  Britain,  and  in  all  probability  the 
modern  Madeira. 

There  can  be  no  doubt  that  it  was  the  shell-fish 
producing  this  invaluable  dye  that,  in  the  first 
instance,  led  to  the  amazing  developments  that 
took  place  in  naval  construction  and  the  spread  of 
the  Phoenician  colonial  system.  The  whole  fish 
was  not  used  in  the  preparation  of  the  dye,  but  an 
almost  microscopic  quantity  obtained  from  a  small 
sac  at  the  back  of  the  head,  which  is  said  to  have 
yielded  only  one  drop,  whereas  three  hundred  pounds 
of  the  dye,  according  to  some  authorities,  were  re 
quired  to  dye  fifty  pounds  of  wool.  From  this  it 
will  be  seen  that  the  home  fisheries  could  not  for 
any  long  period  have  yielded  an  inexhaustible 
supply  of  the  precious  fluid.  Consequently  the 
fishermen  found  it  necessary  to  go  farther  afield, 


68     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

where,  although  not  so  rich  in  the  finer  shades  of 
colour,  still  provided  a  fluid  of  great  commercial 
value. 

That  the  first  colonial  settlements  of  the  Phoe 
nicians  were  therefore  of  the  nature  of  mere  fishing 
stations  will  easily  be  understood,  for  nearly  all  the 
Mediterranean  colonies  were  in  the  first  place 
identified  with  this  industry.  The  name  purple, 
however,  must  not  be  understood  as  representing 
one  distinct  colour,  but  the  entire  range  of  colours 
obtained  from  the  murex,  of  which  nine  were  simple 
purple  colours  from  white  to  black,  and  five  mixed 
(Heeren,  Phoenicia,  p.  343).  As,  however,  the 
quality  and  colour  of  the  dye  was  determined  by 
physical  causes  superinduced  by  the  temperature 
of  the  sea,  sunlight,  and  the  food  on  which  the 
murex  subsisted,  an  enormous  area  was  necessarily 
brought  under  levy  to  provide  suitable  pigment 
for  the  wide  range  of  colours  demanded  by  the 
world-wide  trade  to  which  the  dye-vats  of  Tyre  and 
Sidon  catered. 

In  a  consideration  of  the  causes  which  led  to 
the  phenomenal  development  of  the  Phoenician 
marine,  it  is  necessary  that  we  should  not  lose  sight 
of  the  increasing  range  of  these  voyages,  for  in  this 
will  be  found  a  sufficient  cause  not  only  for  the 
increasing  tonnage  of  the  Phoenician  ships,  but  also 
for  the  spread  of  their  colonial  system  as  a  means 
of  providing  harbours  to  which  their  vessels  might 
run  in  case  of  emergency  (Asiat.  Res.,  vol.  i.  318). 
It  should  also  be  remembered  that  the  size  of  the 
vessels  of  the  Phoenicians  would  not  depend  on  their 
fitness  to  carry  the  relatively  small  cargo  of  a 
manufactured  nature  consigned  on  the  outward 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA   TRADE        69 

voyage,  so  much  as  on  their  carrying  capacity  for 
the  bulky  raw  material  which  formed  the  staple  of 
the  return  cargoes. 

Probably  it  is  in  consequence  of  the  insufficient 
attention  that  has  been  given  to  this  aspect  of  the 
subject  that  there  has  been  a  disposition  to  belittle 
the  advanced  state  of  the  Phoenician  marine  during 
the  period  of  Hiram  and  Solomon.  This  is  un 
fortunate,  because  it  has  prevented  a  true  estimate 
of  the  progress  of  the  nation,  both  with  respect  to 
the  extent  of  its  colonial  developments  and  the 
growth  of  its  marine.  If  we  conceive  of  it  as  re 
presented  by  types  of  such  craft  as  are  outlined  on 
Phoenician  coins  and  tombs  during  the  period  of 
Phoenicia's  greatest  expansion,  it  will  clearly  be 
impossible  to  suppose  that  the  nation  was  ever 
employed  on  such  voyages  as  those  that  will  shortly 
engage  our  attention. 

Until  500  B.C.  no  Greek  ship  had  penetrated 
beyond  the  pillars  of  Hercules.  Phoenicia  was  at 
that  time  the  only  navigating  power  in  the  world. 
We  may  therefore  conclude  that  "  the  ship  of  Thar- 
shish"  had  attained  its  final  developments  before 
1050  B.C.,  and  was  then  a  permanent  portion  of  the 
Phoenician  marine,  for  the  foundation  of  Gades  as 
the  terminal  point  of  the  Mediterranean  and  the 
starting-point  for  the  Atlantic  trade  had  already 
become  of  considerable  importance.  If,  therefore, 
any  reliance  can  be  placed  on  the  American  Votanic 
tradition  of  the  arrival  on  the  Pacific  coasts  of  that 
continent  of  seven  large  ships  about  the  year  1000 
B.C.,  it  will  clearly  be  necessary  for  us  to  turn 
to  this  only  navigating  nation  of  antiquity  for 
information  on  the  subject,  for,  as  we  have  already 


70     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

shown,  there  was  no  other  nation  of  the  ancient 
world  who,  either  by  reason  of  the  state  of  their 
marine  or  familiarity  with  the  southern  and  eastern 
Asiatic  seas,  was  capable  of  making  the  journey. 

Voyages  across  the  open  sea  are  not,  as  has  so 
often  been  erroneously  stated,  the  outcome  of  our 
acquaintance  with  the  new  world  from  the  Atlantic 
ports,  but  are  the  natural  result  of  the  evolution  of 
the  nautical  art  and  the  discovery  or  invention  of 
the  loadstone.  So  long  as  navigation  was  confined 
to  coasting  or  even  stretching  from  headland  to 
headland  along  the  coast  line,  very  little  progress 
was  possible.  Once  this  method  of  navigation  was 
discarded  and  steering  by  a  stellar  object  took 
its  place  (which  was  clearly  of  Phoenician  origin), 
supplemented  by  the  use  of  the  magnet,  which 
enabled  the  navigator  when  the  weather  was  cloudy 
to  determine  his  position  and  direction  (also,  it 
is  equally  clear,  a  Phoenician  invention),  then  the 
last  obstacle  to  a  complete  mastery  of  the  sea  was 
removed. 

The  history  of  the  compass  and  its  evolution 
from  the  bactellium  or  loadstone  stage  is  therefore 
necessarily  involved  in  the  elucidation  of  our  enigma. 
As,  however,  it  is  too  complex  a  subject  to  be  dealt 
with  briefly  in  connection  with  navigation,  it  will 
be  profitable  to  treat  it  separately.  But  we  may 
be  pardoned  if,  at  this  point,  we  content  ourselves 
by  saying  that  there  is  strong  evidence  to  show  that 
the  instrument  was  of  Phoenician  origin. 

It  is  undoubtedly  true  that  the  historic  voyages 
of  the  Phoenicians  were  mainly  over  a  fixed  course. 
But  besides  these  they  were  in  the  habit  of  fitting 
out  expeditions  for  purposes  of  discovery,  which, 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA   TRADE        71 

as  we  have  shown,  often  led  to  an  enlargement  of 
their  commerce,  though  sometimes  they  seem  to 
have  had  no  result  beyond  the  mere  extension  of 
geographical  knowledge.  In  one  of  these  voyages, 
undertaken  during  the  early  part  of  their  career, 
when  they  set  out  to  explore  Europe,  they  discovered 
not  only  the  Isle  of  Thasos  but  its  gold-mines,  which 
for  centuries  yielded  them  an  immense  revenue. 

In  spite  of  these  historic  facts,  however,  many 
writers  of  high  repute  have  not  hesitated  to  ques 
tion  the  possibilities  of  a  greater  eastern  navigation 
than  that  of  the  Red  Sea  and  the  Persian  Gulf, 
and  even  to  call  in  question 'the  trustworthiness  of 
the  narrative  of  Herodotus,  who  ascribes  to  the 
Phoenicians  the  distinction  of  being  the  first  people 
to  circumnavigate  Africa  (Her.  iv.  41).  But  as  our 
investigation  hinges  more  particularly  on  the  evolu 
tion  of  "  the  ship  of  Tharshish  "  than  on  any  other 
portion  of  the  Phoenician  marine,  we  will  confine 
our  attention  to  this  phase  of  our  subject  for  a 
little. 

The  name  Tharshish,  as  we  have  shown,  was  not 
first  applied  to  one  of  the  districts  of  the  Spanish 
Peninsula,  but  derived  from  one  of  the  sons  of 
Javan,  who  reached  southern  Italy,  where  he  and 
his  descendants  settled.  The  name  indeed  only 
became  displaced  as  the  horizon  of  the  Phoenician 
navigators  moved  westward.  The  name  Tharshish, 
therefore,  even  when  Phoenicia  was  at  the  zenith  of 
its  power,  seems  to  the  Hebrew  writers  expecially 
to  have  represented  only  a  certain  region  by  which 
the  Mediterranean  was  bounded  on  the  west,  just  as 
to  Europeans  the  West  Indies  for  centuries  meant 
not  only  the  islands  which  we  now  call  by  that 


72     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

name,  but  the  whole  continent  of  America,  both 
north  and  south,  with  the  islands  that  cluster 
around  them. 

The  vessels,  which  went  by  the  name  of  ships  of 
Tharshish,  and  were  employed  on  these  long  voyages 
to  Italy  and  the  Adriatic,  and,  later,  to  Cadiz  and  the 
Atlantic  ports,  were  so  called  to  distinguish  them 
from  the  smaller  craft  plying  on  the  eastern  Medi 
terranean.  The  Tharshish  ship,  therefore,  must  be 
viewed  as  having  been  evolved  pari  passu  with  the 
extension  of  Tharshish  westward,  so  that  probably  it 
stood  for  the  terminal  point  of  the  Mediterranean  voy 
ages,  when  a  steady  trade  between  the  Spanish  Pen 
insula  was  in  operation.  There  can  be  no  reasonable 
doubt  as  to  the  Tharshish  ship  having  formed  the 
model  after  which  the  Greeks  constructed  their  great 
Alexandria  corn  ships,  which  were  famous  during  the 
early  portion  of  the  Christian  era  (Acts  xxvii.  6). 
We  have  no  difficulty,  therefore,  in  recognising  the 
class  of  vessel  to  which  the  Tharshish  ship  was 
allied,  and  it  would  be  imprudent  to  associate  it 
with  the  sculptured  reliefs  of  the  Sargonid  period 
in  which  the  Phoenician  galleys  are  represented. 

We  should  naturally  expect  that  the  evolution  of 
these  ships  of  Tharshish  would  have  been  all  the 
more  regular  and  certain  by  reason  of  the  centuries 
occupied  in  their  development,  the  increasing  range 
of  their  navigation,  and  their  better  acquaintance 
with  the  peculiar  difficulties  that  beset  their  course 
on  the  western  Mediterranean.  From  Tyre  or 
Sidon  to  the  Argolic  coast,  or  rather  to  Nauplia, 
which  was  always  the  leading  port,  was  a  distance 
of  700  miles  as  the  crow  flies,  but  the  distance  from 
Tyre  to  Gades  was  2500  miles.  The  tin  islands 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA   TRADE        73 

were,  however,  1200  miles  from  Cadiz,  and  the  shores 
of  Norway  2000  miles  from  the  Spanish  port,  so  that 
if  the  tin  and  amber  of  these  distant  regions  were 
with  the  silver  of  the  Iberian  Peninsula  pouring  at 
that  time  into  the  warehouses  of  Tyre  and  Sidon, 
it  is  easy  to  understand  the  causes  that  were  at 
work  in  the  final  developments  of  the  Phoenician 
marine.  The  navigation  of  900  miles,  which  the 
journey  from  Tyre  to  the  Baltic  implies,  and  this 
through  many  degrees  of  stormy  north  latitude 
where  steady  trade  winds  and  the  tideless  Medi 
terranean  could  not  be  counted  on,  must  have 
taxed  to  the  utmost  the  skill  and  resource  not  only 
of  the  hardy  seamen  of  Phoenicia,  but  even  of  the 
wise  men  of  Tyre,  who,  it  would  seem  from  the 
remarks  of  the  prophet  Ezekiel  (xxvii.  8),  were,  on 
account  of  the  arduous  nature  of  some  of  these 
voyages,  called  to  the  assistance  of  the  State  in  the 
protection  of  its  monopolies.  It  should  also  be 
apparent  from  the  nature  and  extent  of  Phoenician 
navigation  that  their  voyages  were  prosecuted  by 
night  as  well  as  by  day,  even  if  we  had  no  direct 
testimony  that  they  were  accustomed  to  steer  by 
the  pole  star  (Ency.  Brit.,  xviii.  804).  We  also  know 
from  Herodotus  (iii.  136)  that  they  made  charts  of 
those  seas  in  which  they  did  business,  and  from  the 
remarks  of  Strabo  (xvi.  757)  that  they  used  arith 
metical  calculation  for  reckoning  the  ship's  progress 
at  night  and  the  relative  position  of  ports,  which 
leads  us  to  suppose  that  they  were  in  possession  of 
some  instrument  like  the  log  for  determining  the 
speed  of  their  ships.  Besides  they  were  not  only 
familiar  with  spring  and  neap  tides  but  with  their 
causes. 


74     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

From  a  consideration  of  these  facts  there  should 
be  no  great  difficulty  in  realising  that  the  Phoe 
nicians  had  passed  far  beyond  the  primitive  stages 
of  seamanship  and  navigation  long  before  the 
twelfth  century  B.C.  By  reason  of  their  knowledge 
and  practical  ability  they  were  entitled  to  make  the 
proud  boast  that  no  navigation  was  impossible  to 
them. 

The  needs  of  an  uncivilised,  or  at  best  only 
partially  civilised,  people  are  necessarily  of  a  some 
what  rudimentary  character,  so  that  the  outlying 
settlements  opened  up  by  the  increasing  range  of 
these  voyages  must  have  proved  extremely  valuable 
to  the  Phoenicians  as  a  market  for  their  gew-gaws 
and  trinkets,  and  even  more  for  the  disposal  of  those 
surplus  stocks  of  manufactured  goods  no  longer  in 
demand  in  the  more  civilised  centres  where  custom 
and  fashion  gave  pattern  and  design  only  a  tem 
porary  value. 

The  mere  fact  that  the  main  trend  of  the  busi 
ness  of  the  Phoenicians  was  always  toward  the  great 
centres  of  civilisation,  makes  it  apparent  that  it 
was  not  only  on  account  of  the  quality  of  their  goods 
but  equally  on  account  of  their  manner  of  disposing 
of  them  that  they  were  highly  approved.  There  is, 
nevertheless,  just  as  little  doubt  that  while  the 
transactions  of  the  larger  merchants  in  the  great 
centres  of  population  such  as  Babylonia,  Yemen, 
Greece,  and  Egypt  earned  for  the  Phoenicians  a 
reputation  for  probity  and  trustworthiness,  the 
commerce  of  the  outlying  regions  and  the  more 
sparsely  populated  territories  opened  up  by  the 
increasing  radius  of  their  navigation  was  largely 
in  the  hands  of  bold  and  often  unscrupulous  ad- 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA    TRADE        75 

venturers.  Still  it  is  difficult  to  conceive  of  business 
being  continued  on  such  lines  much  beyond  the  in 
cipient  stages,  especially  on  the  coasts  of  Asia 
Minor  and  the  Greek  Archipelago,  for  these  regions 
were  at  an  early  period  colonised  by  their  own 
people,  who  carried  with  them  the  leavening  influ 
ence  of  a  somewhat  advanced  civilisation.  It  is, 
therefore,  more  than  probable  that  after  a  few 
generations  the  traders  with  the  main  centres  of 
civilisation  must  have  recognised  that  a  continu 
ously  profitable  business  could  only  be  conducted 
by  a  practical  application  of  the  belief  that  honesty 
was  the  best  policy. 

The  magnitude  of  the  Phoenician  transactions  in 
the  Babylonian,  Egyptian,  and  Arabian  markets, 
in  consequence  of  the  position  which  they  occupied 
as  a  manufacturing  and  exporting  as  well  as  an 
importing  nation,  must  have  enabled  them  for 
centuries  to  enjoy  a  complete  monopoly  of  the 
trade  of  the  eastern  Mediterranean.  During  the 
period  from  1500  B.C.,  when  Cadmus,  the  son  of 
Agenor,  king  of  Phoenicia,  first  arrived  in  Bceotia, 
carrying  with  him  the  sixteen  letters  of  the  Phoe 
nician  alphabet,  until  at  least  uoo  B.C.,  when  the 
Greeks  took  possession,  the  eastern  end  of  the 
Mediterranean,  or  at  least  that  portion  which  in 
cludes  the  Sporades  and  Cyclades,  Cyprus,  Rhodes, 
the  Peloponnesus,  and  the  coasts  of  Asia  Minor 
generally,  was  colonised  by  the  Phoenicians  and 
wholly  occupied  by  their  marine.  Here  they 
catered  to  the  inhabitants  with  articles  of  the  most 
costly  description,  for  which  there  was  always  a 
steadily  growing  demand.  Among  these  were  the 
products  of  Southern  Arabia,  the  manufactures  of 


76     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Tyre,  the  purple  garments  and  rich  apparel  so  much 
in  demand  among  the  priestly  and  wealthy  classes, 
the  jewellery  of  gold  and  amber,  priceless  silver 
ornaments  and  bronzes,  and  those  trinkets  and  gew 
gaws  for  which  the  Phoenician  workmen  had  always 
been  famous.  With  whatever  good  grace  the  Phoe 
nicians  may  have  accepted  their  dismissal  from  the 
markets  nearest  to  the  home  ports,  they  speedily 
adopted  a  policy  with  regard  to  their  more  distant 
settlements  that  seems  to  have  stood  the  nation  in 
good  stead.  Henceforth  they  allowed  nothing  to 
transpire  either  with  regard  to  their  navigation  to 
these  distant  settlements  or  the  character  of  their 
colonial  expansion.  Probably  it  was  this  policy 
of  secrecy  that  was  instrumental  in  the  rapid 
progress  of  Phoenicia  as  a  manufacturing  and  navi 
gating  nation,  for  they  could  not  have  failed  to 
recognise  that  it  was  only  to  these  distant  settle 
ments  that  large  consignments  of  merchandise 
could  be  made,  the  sales  in  all  other  markets  being 
of  a  more  or  less  retail  character. 

The  need  of  protecting  their  colonial  expansion 
from  invasion  by  outsiders  demanded  at  the  same 
time  the  ability  to  supply  all  the  distant  markets 
required,  and  that  with  as  good  if  not  a  superior 
character  of  merchandise  to  that  obtainable  else 
where.  Moreover,  as  this  traffic  was  one  of  barter 
pure  and  simple,  Phoenicia  was  necessarily  the  final 
arbiter  of  values,  the  ultimate  profit  to  the  merchant 
not  depending  wholly  on  the  purchasing  price  of 
the  merchandise  that  was  carried  abroad,  but  on 
the  value  of  the  raw  products  in  the  home  markets. 

There  was  one  branch  of  their  distant  sea  trade 
io  which  the  Phoenicians  clung  with  extreme  tenacity, 


NAVIGATION    AND   SEA   TRADE        77 

and  which  at  a  date  long  subsequent  to  the  seventh 
century  they  prevented  even  the  Romans  from 
sharing  with  them.  This  was  the  tin  trade  with 
the  Scilly  Isles  and  the  coasts  of  Cornwall,  which 
was  one  of  the  chief  sources  of  their  wealth,  tin  being 
required  by  nearly  all  the  races  with  which  they 
had  dealings,  for  hardening  into  bronze  the  copper 
which  they  used  for  tools. 

Throughout  their  long  career  the  Phoenicians 
pre-eminently  distinguished  themselves  in  the  work 
ing  of  mines.  So  great  was  the  quantity  of  silver 
found  by  the  Phoenicians  on  their  first  arrival  in 
the  south-western  portion  of  the  Spanish  Peninsula, 
that  they  are  said  to  have  loaded  their  craft  with 
the  metal  down  to  the  water's  edge  and,  on  returning 
to  Tyre,  to  have  so  fired  the  imagination  of  the  nation 
with  their  tales  of  the  wealth  of  this  western 
Eldorado  as  to  cause  many  of  their  countrymen 
to  proceed  to  Spain,  which  was  rich  not  only  in 
metals  but  also  in  corn,  wine,  oil,  wax,  wool,  and 
fruits.  Thus  the  sea  trade  to  this  distant  region 
became  of  the  most  advantageous  character  to  the 
Phoenicians  at  a  time  when  they  were  losing  their 
hold  on  the  more  convenient  markets  of  Asia  Minor 
and  the  Peloponnesus. 

Another  advantage  accruing  to  the  Phoenicians 
from  the  Spanish  colonies  was  the  service  which 
they  rendered  in  the  extension  of  their  commerce 
on  the  Atlantic,  for  Gades  was  not  only  the  port 
for  the  Tharshish  trade  but  likewise  the  starting- 
point  for  a  more  extended  navigation  on  the  Atlantic 
coasts.  The  great  value  of  the  tin,  silver,  and 
amber  derived  from  this  further  west  by  the  Phoe 
nicians  explains  quite  satisfactorily  the  care  they 


78     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

exercised  that  they  should  not  be  supplanted  in 
these  regions  as  they  had  been  nearer  home.  Amber 
in  the  Mediterranean  markets  was  as  valuable  as 
gold,  while  silver  in  the  southern  countries  was 
even  more  precious  than  that  metal.  Tin  was  also 
extremely  valuable. 

Relatively  small  vessels  have  in  all  ages  been 
considered  the  most  suitable  for  purposes  of  ex 
ploration  and  discovery,  because  many  dangers  are 
avoided  by  the  use  of  vessels  of  light  draft.  It 
would  be  unwise,  therefore,  to  judge  of  the  possi 
bility  of  discovery  in  any  region  of  the  world  by 
the  Phoenicians  by  simple  reference  to  the  size  of 
the  vessels  in  their  possession  at  any  given  period. 
Rather  should  we  view  the  comparatively  small 
craft  which  they  employed  on  these  expeditions, 
when  well  equipped  and  commanded  by  the  right 
men,  as  representing  a  type  of  vessel  that  was 
thought  to  be  the  most  effective.  Indeed,  the  mere 
fact  that  the  small  craft  of  Columbus  and  Cook 
fulfilled  the  expectations  of  the  practical  seamen 
who  selected  them  should  not  be  lost  sight  of  in  an 
inquiry  such  as  this,  for  the  question  of  the  original 
discovery  of  America  by  Igh  and  Imox  (Nat.  Races, 
v.  164)  is  necessarily  involved,  and  this  must  have 
taken  place  some  years  before  the  construction  of 
these  ships  of  Tharshish  for  Solomon  and  Hiram. 

The  ship  of  Tharshish  was  evolved  by  combining 
in  one  vessel  the  peculiar  features  belonging  to  the 
round  merchant  Gaulos  and  the  long  lost  ship  of 
war.  It  was  the  starting-point  for  the  creation  of 
an  entirely  new  type  of  vessel,  which  in  its  main 
features  has  survived  through  succeeding  ages, 
although  it  does  not  seem  to  have  become  a  fixed 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA    TRADE        79 

model  before  the  twelfth  century  B.C.,  when  the 
Tharshish  trade  as  relating  to  the  Spanish  Peninsula 
assumed  vast  dimensions.  History  has  not  left  us 
in  complete  ignorance  regarding  this  phase  of 
Phoenician  naval  architecture.  By  reference  to 
Xenophon  (Oecon.,  viii.  n)  we  obtain  a  rather  graphic 
account  of  a  Phoenician  armed  merchant  ship  of 
this  type  during  the  Persian  period,  which  is  usually 
placed  about  500  B.C.  In  this  passage  Xenophon 
makes  one  of  his  characters  say,  "  I  think  that  one 
of  the  best  and  most  perfect  arrangements  of  things 
that  I  ever  saw  was  when  I  went  to  look  at  the  great 
Phoenician  sailing  vessels,  for  I  saw  there  the  largest 
amount  of  naval  tacking  separately  disposed  in  the 
smallest  stowage.  For  a  ship,  as  you  know,  is 
brought  to  anchor  and  again  got  under  weigh  by 
means  of  a  number  of  wooden  implements  and  of 
ropes,  and  sails  the  seas  by  means  of  a  quantity  of 
rigging,  and  is  armed  with  a  number  of  contrivances 
against  hostile  vessels,  and  carries  about  with  it  a 
supply  of  weapons  for  the  crew,  and  has  besides  all 
the  utensils  that  a  man  keeps  in  his  dwelling  for 
each  of  the  messes.  In  addition  it  is  loaded  with  a 
quantity  of  merchandise  which  the  owner  carries 
with  him  for  his  own  profit.  Now  all  these  things 
which  I  have  mentioned  lay  in  a  space  not  much 
larger  than  a  room  which  could  conveniently  hold 
ten  beds.  And  I  remarked  that  they  lay  in  such  a 
way  as  not  to  obstruct  one  another  so  as  to  consume 
time  when  they  were  suddenly  wanted  for  use. 
Also  I  found  that  the  captain's  assistant,  who  is 
called  the  look-out  man,  so  well  acquainted  with 
the  position  of  all  the  articles  and  with  the  number 
of  them  that  even  at  a  distance  he  could  tell  where 


8o      THE    PHOENICIANS    AND   AMERICA 

everything  lay  and  how  many  there  were  of  each, 
just  as  one  who  had  learned  to  read  could  tell  the 
number  of  letters  in  the  name  of  Socrates,  and 
the  proper  place  for  each.  Moreover,  I  saw  this 
man  in  his  leisure  moments  examining  and  testing 
everything  that  the  vessel  needed  when  at  sea. 
Sons,  I  was  surprised,  I  asked  him  what  he  was 
about,  whereupon  he  replied, '  Stranger,  I  am  looking 
to  see  in  case  anything  should  happen  how  every 
thing  is  arranged  and  whether  anything  is  wanting 
or  is  inconveniently  placed,  for  when  a  storm  arises 
at  sea  it  is  not  possible  to  look  for  what  is  wanting 
or  to  put  to  rights  what  is  awkwardly  arranged/  ' 

It  should  be  clear  from  this  description  that  the 
navigation  of  the  Phoenicians  was  neither  of  the 
primitive  character  nor  conducted  in  the  reckless 
manner  that  some  writers  have  attributed  to  it, 
for  the  apparent  purpose  of  Xenophon  is  to  call 
attention  to  the  fact  that  the  Phoenician  ships  were 
a  class  by  themselves  and  vastly  superior  to  those 
of  his  countrymen.  That  many  of  the  Phoenician 
vessels,  especially  those  employed  on  the  Syrian 
seaboard,  were  small  enough  to  haul  on  shore  there 
can  be  no  question,  but  that  many  of  the  vessels 
were  of  respectable  size  and  that  monster  ships, 
even  for  modern  times,  were  by  no  means  uncommon, 
is  apparent.  The  ship  in  which  St.  Paul  was 
wrecked  carried  276  persons  beside  her  crew  and  a 
cargo  of  wheat  (Acts  xxvii.  27).  Josephus  again 
tells  of  his  being  wrecked  in  the  Adriatic  in  a  vessel 
which  carried  600  passengers.  These  vessels  have 
by  competent  authorities  been  computed  to  have 
measured  from  600  to  1000  tons  burthen. 

There  is  at  the  same  time  abundant  reason  for 


NAVIGATION    AND    SEA    TRADE        81 

believing  that  the  seamanship  of  the  ancients  and 
the  sailing  powers  of  their  vessels  were  far  advanced. 
It  may  be  safely  conceded  that  they  did  not  sail  so 
close  to  the  wind  as  our  more  modern  ships,  but 
they  could  get  within  seven  points,  which  shows  that 
they  were  not  so  dependent  on  a  fair  wind  as  has 
generally  been  supposed.  The  rate  at  which  the 
vessels  sailed  was  likewise  considerable.  St.  Luke 
and  St.  Paul,  with  a  fair  wind,  made  the  run  from 
Rhegium  to  Puteoli  (Acts  xxviii.  13),  a  distance  of 
182  miles,  in  a  day,  which  gives  an  average  of  from 
seven  to  eight  knots  an  hour,  a  rate  much  superior 
to  the  five  knot  average  on  the  140  day  run  over 
the  15,000  mile  course  from  California  to  Europe 
made  by  grain  ships  to-day. 

The  point  we  seek  to  emphasize,  however,  is  not 
that  the  Phoenicians  were  in  possession  of  monster 
ships  with  great  sailing  powers,  but  that  they  were 
capable  of  building  and  sailing  any  ships  that  the 
exigencies  of  their  private  business  or  the  business 
of  the  State  demanded ;  that  their  navigation  was 
over  long  courses  and  was  conducted  with  prudence, 
foresight,  and  skill,  and  furthermore,  that  both  the 
ships  and  the  nautical  skill  requisite  to  the  discovery 
of  America  from  the  Red  Sea  port  of  Eziongeber 
were  in  their  possession  long  before  the  period  of 
Hiram  and  Solomon. 

Indeed  it  is  futile  to  attempt  to  intelligently 
understand  the  state  of  the  Phoenician  marine 
either  at  the  Solomonic  or  any  other  period  by 
comparison  with  that  of  other  nations  of  the  ancient 
world.  As  shipbuilders  and  navigators  the  Phoe 
nicians  were  in  a  class  by  themselves.  So  isolated 
was  their  position  that  for  2100  years,  or  from 

F 


82     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

611  B.C.,  when  Phoenician  seamen  circumnavigated 
Africa,  the  world  was  confronted  by  a  feat  which, 
so  far  as  we  know,  was  not  repeated  until  the  fif 
teenth  century  of  our  era,  when  Vasco  da  Gama 
revolutionised  the  commerce  of  the  world  by 
doubling  the  Cape  of  Good  Hope  from  the  west. 
To  arrive  at  the  advanced  position  which  we  occupy 
with  respect  to  the  nautical  arts,  we  have  been 
compelled  to  relay  the  foundations  on  which  the 
Phoenicians  reared  their  marvellous  creations.  The 
more  closely  we  examine  the  ruins  of  the  Phoe 
nician  marine  the  more  we  are  impressed  by  the 
presence  of  a  knowledge  which  served  the  needs  of 
those  adventurous  pioneers  for  a  thousand  years. 
"  Are  we  indeed/'  asks  Heeren,  "  in  a  position  to 
judge  even  with  a  tolerable  degree  of  accuracy  of 
the  perfection  to  which  Phoenician  navigation  was 
carried  or  of  its  various  resources  ?  The  long 
centuries  during  which  they  were  exclusive  masters 
of  the  sea  gave  them  sufficient  time  in  which  to  make 
that  gradual  progress  which  was  perhaps  all  the 
more  regular  in  proportion  to  the  time  which  it 
occupied.  They  carried  the  nautical  art  to  the 
highest  point  of  perfection  then  required,  and  gave 
a  much  wider  scope  to  their  discoveries  and  enter 
prises  than  either  the  Venetians  or  Genoese,  their 
numerous  fleets  being  scattered  over  the  Indian 
and  Atlantic  Oceans,  the  Tyrian  pennant  waving 
at  the  same  time  on  the  coasts  of  Britain  and 
Ceylon  "  (Hist.  Res.,  iii.  340). 


CHAPTER    IV 

THE   PHOENICIANS  AND   THE   COMPASS 

The  Aztec  Calendar  or  Water  Stone  described — Its  connection  with  the 
origin  of  the  compass — Did  the  Chinese  invent  this  instrument  ? 
— The  Phoenicians  and  the  compass — Its  importance  to  their 
naval  expansion — Primitive  compass  familiar  to  early  navigating 
nations — Instrument  closely  identified  with  Phoenician  civilisation 
— Bactellium  and  the  discovery  of  the  Pole  Star  due  to  the 
Phoenicians. 

"  For  I  saw  that  among  rude  people  of  early  times,  inventors  and  discoverers 
were  reckoned  as  gods." — FRANCIS  BACON. 

"  Moreover  the  god  Ouranas  devised  Bactellia,  which  were  stones  that  moved 
as  possessing  life." — Phoenician  History  of  Sanckoniathon,  translated  by  PHILO 
OF  BYBLIUS. 

THERE  were  four  things  essential  to  the  successful 
accomplishment  of  any  voyage  undertaken  by  the 
Phoenicians.  These  were  the  ships  of  which  we  have 
already  spoken,  charts  of  the  seas  frequented,  the 
cross  staff,  and  the  loadstone.  That  the  Phoeni 
cians  were  accustomed  to  survey  by  some  means 
the  coasts  which  they  frequented  there  can  be  no 
question,  for  Herodotus  (iii.  136)  makes  a  positive 
statement  to  this  effect,  supplementing  it  with  the 
information  that  when  so  doing  they  tabulated  their 
notes  for  future  reference.  Strabo  supports  the  testi 
mony  of  Herodotus  by  explaining  that  the  Phoenicians 
applied  their  knowledge  of  astronomy  and  arithmetic 
to  reckoning  a  ship's  course.  The  knowledge  thus 
acquired  also  enabled  them  to  sail  by  night. 

We  have  no  positive  information  with  respect 
to  the  date  of  the  invention  of  the  cross  staff,  but  it 
seems  to  have  been  created  by  the  early  astronomers 
for  just  the  purpose  for  which  it  would  be  required 

in  navigation.    We  may,  therefore,  assume  that  it 

83 


84      THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

was  known  to,  if  not  invented  by,  the  first  astro 
nomers  and  navigators  of  the  Persian  Gulf  and  the 
Syrian  coasts. 

But  the  one  instrument  on  which  it  is  absolutely 
necessary  to  obtain  further  light  in  connection  with 
our  investigation  is  the  loadstone  or  compass. 
Without  the  possession  of  this  instrument  it  is 
impossible  to  conceive  of  such  voyages  as  the  Phoe 
nicians  systematically  undertook  and  prosecuted 
successfully,  for  while  those  on  the  eastern  seas  were 
by  no  means  impossible  during  the  well  determined 
season  of  navigation,  those  to  the  west  would  have 
been  extremely  hazardous  in  the  high  latitudes. 

Had  they  depended  on  astronomical  help  alone 
it  is  easy  to  see  that  a  slight  change  of  weather 
would  have  left  them  at  night  without  any  accurate 
means  of  determining  either  their  position  or  the 
direction  in  which  they  were  sailing.  It  is  un 
fortunate,  therefore,  that  we  have  as  little  definite 
information  with  respect  to  the  origin  of  the  load 
stone  as  we  have  with  regard  to  the  cross  staff. 
This,  however,  is  scarcely  surprising  when  we  re 
member  the  care  that  was  exercised  by  the  Phoe 
nicians  in  preserving  from  the  rest  of  mankind, 
but  especially  from  competing  nations,  all  knowledge 
with  respect  to  their  navigation  and  their  trade. 
Still  there  is  sufficient  historic  data  to  enable  us  to 
solve  the  enigma  satisfactorily  if  we  approach  the 
subject  with  an  open  mind. 

Among  the  more  prominent  features  of  the 
remains  of  the  ancient  civilisation  of  Central  America 
there  is  to  be  found  a  monument  which  seems  to 
provide  the  guidance  necessary  to  lead  us  to  a  clear 
solution  of  our  problem.  Built  into  the  walls  of 
the  Cathedral  of  Mexico  is  a  rectangular  parallel 


PHOENICIANS    AND    THE    COMPASS      85 

opipedon  of  porphyry  13  feet  i|  inches  square, 
3  feet  3 1  inches  thick,  and  weighing  in  its  present 
mutilated  state  twenty-four  tons.  By  some  writers 
this  monument  has  been  described  as  a  Calendar 
Stone  and  by  others  as  a  Piedra  de  Agua,  or  Water 
Stone.  The  sculpture  on  this  strange  memorial  is 
of  a  unique  character.  Baron  Humboldt,  in  de 
scribing  it,  says  "  the  concentric  circles,  the  divisions 
and  subdivisions  without  number,  are  traced  with 
mathematical  exactitude,  and  the  more  we  examine 
the  details  of  the  sculpture  the  more  do  we  discover 
that  taste  for  repetition  of  the  same  form,  that 
spirit  of  order,  that  sentiment  of  symmetry  which, 
among  half  civilised  peoples,  takes  the  place  of  the 
sentiment  of  the  beautiful." 

A  careful  examination  of  this  memorial  will,  we 
venture  to  submit,  throw  a  flood  of  light  on  the 
origin  of  the  compass,  this  so-called  Calendar  or 
Water  Stone  being  neither  more  nor  less  than  a 
national  memorial  of  a  seafaring  people  in  the  form 
of  a  mariner's  compass  to  the  invention  or  posses 
sion  of  which  they  seem  to  have  attributed  the  dis 
covery  of  the  New  Continent.  The  Calendar  Stone 
presents  one  or  two  features  that  may  be  counted 
as  giving  weight  to  this  view.  It  will,  for  instance, 
be  observed  that  the  design  possesses  not  only  a 
north  and  a  south  point  but  also  the  remaining 
cardinal  points,  these  being  duly  emphasized — Kan 
to  the  south,  Maluc  to  the  east,  Ix  to  the  north,  and 
Cuac  to  the  west  (Laudas)  ;  in  addition  there  are 
symbols  of  the  four  winds  that  blow.  Not  only  are 
the  cardinal  points  and  winds  indicated,  but  in 
sub-divisions  mathematically  correct.  The  thirty- 
two  points  into  which  what  we  call  the  modern 
compass  is  divided  are  all  here.  Again,  in  the  main 


86     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

or  south  point  will  be  observed  the  faces  of  Cox- 
cox  and  Xochiquetzae,  the  Mexican  Noah  and  his 
wife,  the  grandparents  of  Chan,  the  progenitors  of 
the  Phoenicians,  the  first  recorded  navigators  (Gen. 
vi.  14),  and  underneath  these  the  Aztec  symbol  for 
water.  All  this  clearly  indicates  that  navigation 
was  the  subject  which  the  stone  was  originally 
intended  to  commemorate. 

But  the  wonder  does  not  end  here.  If  the  stone 
be  placed  in  its  correct  position  with  respect  to  the 
sun  god,  the  Phoenician  Ouranos,  it  will  be  observed 
that  the  main  or  emphasized  point  is  not  north  but 
south,  and  that  in  this  respect  it  agrees  with  the 
Chinese  compass.  Clearly  then  the  design  had  its 
origin  among  a  people  who  were  the  common  in 
ventors  of  both  instruments,  and  to  whom  the  South 
Pole  had  either  a  special  religious  significance  or 
whose  early  navigation  was  mainly  in  a  direction 
to  the  south  of  the  harbours  from  which  they  set 
out.  Both  of  these  presumptions  are  in  perfect 
accord  with  our  knowledge  of  the  Phoenicians.  All 
the  early  navigating  nations  considered  the  south 
the  important  point.  To  the  sun  worshipper  the 
south  was  the  right  hand  of  the  world,  the  place 
of  power,  the  region  whence  emanated  the  divine 
influence,  and  therefore  sacred.  The  early  nations 
therefore  reversed  our  usage,  and  were  accustomed 
to  think  of  the  world  as  having  its  south  on  top 
and  its  north  underneath. 

What  in  all  probability  led  the  Mediterranean 
nations  to  make  the  change  in  the  relative  positions 
of  the  poles,  placing  the  north  above  and  the  south 
below,  was  the  discovery  that  the  Pole  Star  was  the 
one  constant  star  in  the  heavens — a  discovery 
which  is  universally  accredited  to  the  Phoenicians. 


PHOENICIANS    AND    THE    COMPASS      87 

Now  if  this  change  be  placed  about  the  ninth 
century  B.C.  our  problem  will  be  simplified,  for, 
as  Greek  navigation  never  extended  to  a  point 
south  of  the  equator,  the  constellations  used  by  them 
for  this  purpose  were  not  those  of  the  southern  but 
the  northern  hemisphere. 

The  so-called  Chinese  compass  (using  the  word 
in  its  restricted  sense)  was  not  in  use  for  purposes 
of  navigation  until  about  the  third  century  of  our 
era,  and  was  a  rude  and  unsatisfactory  instrument 
with  only  sixteen  points,  so  that  it  is  useless  to 
attempt  to  make  any  direct  connection  between  it 
and  the  very  elaborate  design  found  on  the  Mexican 
calendar  stone.  There  has  been,  however,  so  much 
misunderstanding  regarding  the  supposed  relation 
of  this  instrument  to  the  mariner's  compass  that  it 
will  be  profitable  to  give  some  attention  to  the 
Chinese  narrative  on  which  the  claim  is  founded. 

The  earliest  historic  reference  relative  to  the 
discovery  of  the  directive  properties  of  the  suspended 
magnet  is,  according  to  these  Chinese  records,  200 
years  after  the  erection  of  the  temple  to  Hercules 
at  Tyre,  by  which  time  the  Phoenicians  were  already 
the  great  trade  intermediaries  of  the  ancient  world. 
But  this  Chinese  document  nowhere  refers  to  the 
instrument  as  a  Chinese  invention.  Indeed  the 
fact  that  it  was  hastily  constructed  during  the 
progress  of  a  war  leads  us  to  infer  that  the  story  was 
not  designed  to  give  an  account  of  its  invention,  but 
simply  to  show  the  surpassing  value  of  the  instru 
ment  to  the  Chinese  during  a  period  of  national 
stress.  This  story  was  not  translated  into  any 
European  language  until  Klaproth  published  his 
letter  to  Baron  Humboldt  in  1834.  It  was  entitled 
"  La  invention  de  la  Console."  A  translation  from 


88     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

the  French  was  made  by  Mr.  T.  S.  Davies  in  his 
u  Early  History  of  the  Compass/'  published  in 
the  British  Annual  of  1837,  to  which  we  now 
advert.  The  document  refers  it  to  2634  B.C.  and 
is  entitled  "  Honang-ti  punishes  Tchi-Yeon  at 
Tchon-lon." 

"  The  Wai-ki  said  Tchon-Yeon  bore  the  name 
Khiang  :  he  was  related  to  the  Emperor  Yan-ti. 
He  delighted  in  war  and  turmoil.  He  made  swords 
and  lances  and  large  cross-bows  to  oppress  and 
devastate  the  empire.  He  called  and  brought  to 
gether  the  chiefs  of  all  the  provinces  ;  his  grasping 
disposition  and  avarice  exceeded  all  bounds. 

"  Yang-ti  was  obliged  to  retire  and  seek  an 
asylum  in  the  plains  of  Tchon-lon.  The  latter 
then  raised  a  thick  fog  that  by  means  of  the  dark 
ness  he  might  spread  confusion  in  the  enemy's 
ranks,  but  Honang-Yonan,  which  is  the  proper 
name  of  the  Emperor  Yang-ti,  constructed  chariots 
for  indicating  the  south  in  order  to  indicate  the  four 
cardinal  points  by  means  of  which  he  pursued  Tchi- 
Yeon  and  took  him  prisoner.  He  caused  him  to 
be  ignominiously  put  to  death  at  Tchonng-ki,  the 
spot  from  this  circumstance  receiving  the  name  of 
the  broken  curb/' 

It  is  on  this  bald  statement  of  the  manufacture 
of  a  land  carriage,  surmounted  by  a  loadstone  for 
the  purpose  of  indicating  the  south  and  north 
points,  that  the  Chinese  claim  to  the  invention  of 
the  compass  is  founded.  But  this  is  not  the  only 
reference  to  these  magnet  cars  found  in  Chinese 
literature.  A  passage  from  the  Sze-ki,  a  historical 
memoir  of  Szi-ma  Tseen,  the  restorer  of  Chinese 
history,  compiled  in  the  early  part  of  the  second 
century  of  our  era  from  authentic  documents,  says 


PHOENICIANS    AND    THE    COMPASS      89 

that  in  the  second  year  of  the  reign  of  Chang-wang, 
the  second  emperor  of  the  Cow  dynasty  (mo  B.C.), 
five  of  these  magnetic  chariots,  called  Fse-nan  or 
indicators  of  the  south,  were  presented  to  the  am 
bassadors  of  Tonquin  and  Cochin  China  to  direct 
their  course  over  the  immense  grassy  plains  which 
it  was  necessary  for  them  to  cross  on  their  return 
journey.  These  chariots  are  said  to  have  been 
finished  with  a  little  manikin  clad  in  a  vest  of 
feathers,  having  his  outstretched  arm  so  suspended 
that,  despite  the  movement  of  the  car,  the  mag 
netised  hand  pointed  steadily  to  the  south.  In 
addition  to  this  figure  a  hodometer  was  attached 
to  each  car,  which  by  strokes  marked  the  distance 
covered  on  a  bell  so  arranged  as  to  exhibit  a  sort  of 
dead  reckoning 

The  use  of  these  magnetic  cars  does  not  seem 
to  have  altered  in  any  particular  throughout  the 
succeeding  centuries,  for  their  presence  in  Tartary 
as  late  as  the  fifteenth  century  of  our  era  is  vouched 
for  by  Baron  Humboldt.  Mr.  Klaproth,  in  his 
study  of  the  subject,  calls  attention  to  the  use  to 
which  the  Chinese  put  the  magnet  and  magnetised 
iron.  The  most  ancient  of  the  two  was  the 
employment  of  the  loadstone  or  magnet  in  the 
manufacture  of  magnetic  cars.  The  other  was  the 
employment  of  magnetised  iron  in  making  compasses 
either  to  float  or  to  balance  on  a  pivot,  which  en 
abled  them,  without  obstruction,  to  move  in  the 
Polar  direction.  Many  writers,  failing  to  grasp 
this  distinction,  have  confounded  the  land  chariot 
with  the  compass,  and  consequently  have  errone 
ously  supposed  that  these  chariots  were  directed  by 
a  magnetised  needle  instead  of  the  loadstone. 
China,  so  far  as  we  know,  during  the  period  2634 


go     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND   AMERICA 

B.C.  did  not  extend  to  the  sea,  the  capital  of  the  old 
emperors  being  situated  in  the  central  plains  either 
on  the  Yellow  River  or  on  one  of  its  affluents.  The 
construction  of  the  magnetic  chariot,  therefore,  did 
not  involve  the  invention  of  the  sea  compass  which, 
according  to  our  best  authorities,  was  not  known 
in  China  before  the  third  century  of  our  era,  or 
about  3000  years  after  the  construction  of  the  first 
magnetic  car  by  the  Emperor  Honang-ti. 

From  all  this  it  should  be  apparent  that  prior 
to  A.D.  300  China  did  not  possess  a  sea  compass. 
On  the  other  hand,  it  was  in  possession  of  a  know 
ledge  of  the  directive  properties  of  the  loadstone  or 
suspended  magnet  as  early  as  2634  B.C.,  and  applied 
it  then  in  the  only  direction  in  which  it  could  have 
been  of  any  service  to  them,  namely,  for  land 
journeys  and  to  enable  them  to  cross  uninhabited 
territory  at  a  period  when  land  transportation  over 
the  Asiatic  continent  was  in  the  hands  of  the 
Phoenicians. 

There  is  nothing  in  Chinese  history  but  the 
stories,  to  which  we  have  referred,  to  indicate  that 
the  compass,  any  more  than  their  systems  of 
astronomy,  numerals,  or  religion,  were  of  indigen 
ous  birth.  The  astronomical  system  of  the  Chinese 
was  Babylonian,  and  their  numeral  and  religious 
systems  Indian.  If,  therefore,  we  take  these  as 
affording  any  light  regarding  the  origin  of  the 
compass,  it  will  be  necessary  to  look  to  some  more 
ancient  civilisation  for  the  source  from  which  it 
was  drawn. 

The  earliest  reference  to  the  magnet  and  its 
peculiar  properties  is  that  found  in  the  Phoenician 
history  of  Sanchoniathon  preserved  in  a  fragment 
translated  into  Greek  by  Herenius  Philo,  better 


PHOENICIANS    AND    THE    COMPASS      91 

known  as  Philo  Byblius.  In  this  fragment  San- 
choniathon  ascribes  to  the  god  Ouranos  the  con 
struction  of  the  first  suspended  magnet  or  bactellium. 
The  passage  is  as  follows  :  "  But  in  process  of  time, 
whilst  Ouranos  was  still  in  banishment,  he  sent  his 
daughter  Astarte,  being  a  virgin,  with  two  other 
of  his  sisters,  Rhea  and  Dione,  to  cut  off  Chronus 
by  treachery,  but  Chronus  took  the  damsels  and 
married  them,  notwithstanding  they  were  his  own 
sisters.  When  Ouranos  understood  this  he  sent 
other  auxiliaries  to  make  war  against  him,  but 
Chronus  gained  the  affection  of  these  also  and 
detained  them  with  himself.  Moreover  the  god 
Ouranos  devised  bactellia-contriving  stones  that  moved 
as  having  life."*  Ouranos,  one  of  the  progenitors 
of  the  Phoenician  race,  by  a  comparison  of  Phoe 
nician  and  Hebrew  chronologies,  is  identified  with 
Noah,  who  lived  many  centuries  before  the  arrival 
of  the  Chinese  in  the  region  of  the  Yellow  River. 
We  have,  therefore,  a  historic  or  at  least  traditional 
account  of  the  discovery  and  invention  of  the  sus 
pended  magnet  from  a  source  where  the  stress  of 
the  national  life  of  its  possessors  would  naturally 
lead  us  to  look  for  its  presence. 

Now  it  is  as  impossible  to  suppose  that  this 
discovery  would  have  been  one  of  the  few  surviving 
fragments  of  Phoenician  history  unless  it  had  a  very 
definite  association  with  the  national  career  of  the 
people,  as  it  would  be  to  carefully  observe  the 
vibratory,  life-like  movement  of  the  suspended 
bactellium  without  one's  attention  being  conscious 
that  it  only  continued  so  long  as  the  bactellium 
was  turned  from  the  Polar  direction,  and  that, 
however  turned  or  set  in  motion,  it  always  came  to 

1  Sanchoniathori)  Rt.  Rev.  R.  Cumberland,  1720. 


92     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

rest  when  pointing  to  the  Kibleh  or  sacred  point. 
It  seems  reasonable,  therefore,  to  assume  that  the 
discovery  of  the  directive  power  of  the  bactellium 
was  synchronised  with  the  discovery  of  the  vibra 
tory,  life-like  movement  of  the  suspended  magnet. 

Can  we  suppose  then  that  the  Phoenicians,  who 
were  the  discoverers  of  the  Pole  Star  and  used  it  as 
the  principal  sign  in  their  navigation,  never  ob 
served  the  connection  that  existed  between  the 
Polar  directive  properties  of  the  bactellium  and  the 
Phoenician  or  Pole  Star  ?  The  Phoenicians  were 
accredited  by  the  ancient  world  with  having  out 
stripped  all  other  nations  in  navigation,  largely  on 
account  of  the  discovery  that  the  Pole  Star  alone 
remains  constant  in  the  heavens,  so  that  if  the  use 
to  which  the  suspended  bactellium  was  put  by 
them  was  that  of  locating  the  position  of  this  Phoe 
nician  star  in  stormy  and  cloudy  weather,  we  are 
able  to  establish  a  most  important  relation  between 
the  two  discoveries. 

It  is,  however,  unnecessary  to  presume  merely 
that  this  was  the  case,  for  all  the  early  writers  on 
the  compass,  while  still  in  the  bactellium  or  load 
stone  stage,  emphatically  state  that  it  was  an 
instrument  used  for  finding  the  Pole  Star  when  the 
sky  was  clouded.  It  is  a  very  significant  fact  that 
the  Phoenician  nation  evidently  placed  a  higher 
practical  value  on  the  invention  of  the  bactellium 
than  they  did  on  the  discovery  of  the  Phoenician  or 
Pole  Star.  The  first  is  incorporated  in  their  history 
of  themselves  as  among  their  crowning  achieve 
ments,  whereas  the  discovery  of  the  Pole  Star  is 
not  recorded  by  themselves  but  by  Greek  historians. 
The  reason  is  obvious.  The  discovery  that  the 
Phoenician  Star  was  the  one  constant  star  in  the 


PHOENICIANS    AND    THE    COMPASS      93 

heavens  would  not  of  itself  have  solved  the  problem 
of  navigation,  nor  would  the  invention  of  the  bac- 
tellium  have  done  more  for  Phoenicia  than  provide 
a  plaything  for  the  children  of  Tyre  and  Sidon  if 
it  had  not  been  known  to  provide  a  definite  and  un 
failing  guidance  from  its  suspended  polar  direction 
to  the  Pole  Star.  It  is  in  the  due  conjunction  of 
these  two  great  discoveries  that  we  find  the  key 
to  the  phenomenal  naval  expansion  of  the  Phoe 
nicians. 

To  suppose  that  the  Phoenicians  actually 
ventured  on  such  long  voyages  as  those  to  Ophir 
(i  Kings  ix.  28)  and  carried  valuable  cargoes  (the 
return  cargo  in  gold  alone  on  one  voyage  amounted 
to  four  hundred  and  twenty  talents  or  about  four 
million  pounds  sterling),  with  no  better  guide  than 
the  coast  line,  when  caravan  transport  would  not 
only  have  eliminated  risks  but  cut  down  the  journey 
to  eight  months,  is  to  exhibit  amazing  credulity 
with  respect  to  the  sagacity  of  the  Phoenicians  and 
gross  ignorance  as  to  the  means  by  which  they  be 
came  the  greatest  navigating  power  of  the  ancient 
world.  We  find  traces  of  their  presence  in  localities 
which,  as  we  shall  see  later,  they  would  never  have 
sought  and  from  which  it  would  have  been  prac 
tically  impossible  to  return  unless  they  had  been 
in  possession  of  some  instrument  that  rendered 
them  independent  both  of  a  stellar  object  and 
weather  conditions. 

The  more  this  subject  is  considered  the  more 
does  it  become  apparent  that  the  stress  of  the 
national  life  of  Phoenicia  demanded  the  compass. 
Indeed,  it  is  more  than  evident  from  the  fragments 
of  their  history  surviving,  to  which  attention  has 
been  called,  that  it  existed,  though  the  secret  of 


94     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

its  existence  was  guarded  with  as  scrupulous  care 
from  the  other  nations  of  antiquity  as  the  secret 
of  the  destination  of  their  most  distant  voyages. 
The  invention  and  development  of  the  compass 
from  the  crude  bactellium  or  suspended  magnet  to 
the  Piedra  de  Agua  found  in  the  first  centres  of 
civilisation  on  the  American  continent,  stands  in 
much  the  same  relation  to  the  commercial  and 
colonial  development  of  the  Phoenicians  that  the 
invention  and  development  of  the  steam-engine 
does  to  the  commercial  and  colonial  development 
of  our  day. 

In  order  to  understand  the  full  significance  of 
the  compass  to  the  Phoenicians,  it  will  be  necessary 
to  follow  the  evolution  of  the  instrument  from  the 
simple  bactellium,  a  Bethel  or  house  of  God,  in 
which  was  supposed  to  be  resident  the  indwelling, 
vibrating  life  of  the  Deity. 

It  has  been  said  that  one  of  the  first  uses  to 
which  the  south-pointing  chariot  was  applied  was 
locating  to  the  worshipper  the  Kibleh  or  sacred 
south  point  when  the  sky  was  obscured.  What 
truth  there  may  be  in  this  statement  it  is  difficult 
to  discover,  but  if  true  it  would  at  least  enable  us 
to  trace  the  existence  of  a  connection  in  the  mind 
of  the  early  Semite  between  the  south  point  of  the 
bactellium  and  that  of  the  supposed  residence  of 
the  deity  to  whom  he  presented  his  devotions. 
Among  the  Semites  sacrifices  originally  were  not 
burned.  The  god  was  not  conceived  of  as  seated 
aloft  but  as  present  in  the  place  of  sacrifice,  in 
habiting  the  sacred  stone,  the  bactellium.  To  under- 
derstand  this  belief  it  is  necessary,  in  our  conceptions 
of  the  ideas  associated  with  stone  worship  and  true 
worship,  to  think  of  both  as  containing  evidences 


PHOENICIANS    AND    THE    COMPASS      95 

of  life,  otherwise  the  symbolism  would  be  wholly 
meaningless.  The  presence  of  life  in  the  tree  is 
self-evident,  but  it  is  not  so  in  the  stone,  so  that 
the  construction  of  bactelloi  that  manifested  the 
divine  immanence  was  a  feat  of  no  ordinary  sig 
nificance  to  the  subtle  oriental  mind.  At  the  outset, 
therefore,  we  must  not  conceive  of  the  bactellium 
as  a  mass  of  inert  magnetic  ore  like  the  Caaba — 
the  great  black  stone  at  Mecca — but  as  a  manu 
factured  and  suspended  instrument  whose  vibrating, 
life-like  movement  suggested  a  spiritual  infilling. 

How  long  a  period,  it  will  be  asked,  was  occupied 
in  the  evolution  of  the  compass  from  the  bactellium 
or  Bethel  stage  until  it  arrived  at  a  really  effective 
instrument  ?  The  answer  is  that  it  was  an  effective 
instrument  from  the  date  on  which  it  was  dis 
covered  that  the  Polar  axis  rested  when  the  bac 
tellium  pointed  in  a  north  and  south  direction. 
Although  the  compass  was  moving  steadily  towards 
perfection  from  3400  B.C.  (which  date  some  of  our 
authorities  identify  with  the  life  of  Ouranos)  it  was 
only  finally  perfected  at  the  hands  of  Lord  Kelvin 
in  1876.  If,  therefore,  the  final  constructive  stages 
of  the  compass  took  600  years  it  should  surely 
teach  us  to  view  with  complacency  the  apparently 
slow  progress  of  its  early  development. 

That  the  Phoenicians  possessed  some  instrument 
that  enabled  them  to  steer  a  definite  course  through 
the  trackless  deep,  irrespective  of  obstacles  interposed 
by  sea,  coast  line,  or  sky,  seems  to  be  incontrovertible. 
But  if  further  proof  were  needed  one  might  point 
to  the  statement  of  the  prophet  Ezekiel  (xxvii.  8) : 
"  Thy  wise  men  that  were  in  thee,  O  Tyre,  were  thy 
pilots/'  Why  should  the  wise  men  of  Tyre  go  to 
sea  to  direct  the  navigation  of  a  ship  on  a  port  to 


96     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

port  coasting  voyage  where  the  practical  experience 
of  any  captain  in  the  marine  familiar  with  the  coast 
line  would  have  been  of  more  practical  value  ?  Of 
course  the  prophet  is  not  referring  to  the  coasting 
trade  but  to  the  more  distant  navigation  of  the 
Phoenicians,  when  a  direct  course  thither  was 
steered  either  by  a  stellar  object,  when  this  could 
be  seen,  or  by  the  use  of  some  instrument  which 
would  infallibly  determine  the  ship's  position  by 
day  or  night.  In  navigation  of  this  kind  the  wise 
men  of  Tyre,  who  were  expert  in  astronomy  and 
the  use  of  numerals  and  possessed  the  bactellium, 
would  be  invaluable. 

For  overland  travel,  where  the  contour  of  the 
country  provided  an  infallible  means  of  determining 
direction  and  position,  a  rude  map  or  chart  of  the 
general  course  pursued,  when  accompanied  by  the 
primitive  bactellium  or  magnetic  cross,  was  all  that 
was  necessary.  This  likewise  was  sufficient  for  the 
navigation  of  the  eastern  Mediterranean,  the  Persian 
Gulf,  and  the  Red  Sea.  When,  however,  the  Phoe 
nicians  began  to  venture  on  long  voyages  with 
valuable  cargoes  and  large  ships  requiring  much 
tacking  in  the  open  sea,  the  use  of  an  instrument 
of  finer  adjustment  must  have  been  necessary,  and 
it  is  from  this  date,  which  Herodotus  places  about 
1200  B.C.,  when  Cadiz  became  the  port  of  entry  for 
the  Atlantic  trade,  that  substantial  improvements 
were  made  which  constituted  a  distinct  departure 
from  the  primitive  bactellium.  It  is  impossible  to 
conceive  of  the  phenomenal  expansion  that  took 
place  in  Phoenician  naval  construction  and  naviga 
tion  at  this  period,  which  culminated  in  the  great 
ship  of  Tharshish,  unless  it  is  assumed  that  a 
corresponding  advance  had  been  made  in  the 


PHOENICIANS    AND    THE    COMPASS      97 

means  by  which  both  ships  and  cargoes  were  safe 
guarded. 

The  first  form  in  which  we  find  what,  for  sim 
plicity's  sake,  we  will  designate  the  Amalfi  or 
western  compass,  was  divided  into  eight  points, 
whereas  the  Chinese  compass  of  that  date  was 
divided  into  sixteen,  and,  according  to  some 
authorities,  into  twenty-four  parts.  Both  com 
passes,  however,  used  the  same  method  of  suspend 
ing  the  needle  just  a  little  below  the  centre  of 
gravity  with  a  view  to  increasing  the  sensitiveness 
of  its  movement,  yet  the  one  compass  had  a  de 
termined  north  and  the  other  a  determined  south 
point,  whereas  what  we  may  call  the  Aztec  compass, 
he  so-called  calendar  stone  or  Piedra  de  Agua,  had 
the  divisions  carried  to  an  infinitely  finer  degree,  it 
being  possible  to  read  to  a  sixty-fourth  part,  as 
would  be  convenient,  if  not  necessary,  in  navigating 
the  tremendous  stretch  of  ocean  that  lay  between 
Torres  Straits  and  the  American  continent.  It  is 
interesting,  therefore,  in  this  connection  to  notice 
that  the  compass,  although  a  unit  in  its  basic 
principles,  seems  to  have  been  adapted  in  the 
various  stages  of  its  construction  to  the  particular 
needs  of  the  navigation  on  which  it  was  employed. 
But  the  perfect  instrument  is  only  found  where  we 
would  expect  to  find  it,  namely  in  Phoenicia's 
most  distant  colony,  in  that  place  the  navigation 
to  which  would  call  for  the  finest  possible  adjust 
ment. 

To  navigate  from  the  Red  Sea  or  the  Persian 
Gulf  through  the  Indian  and  Pacific  Oceans  to 
America  would  not  have  required  the  use  of  superior 
ships  or  finer  seamanship  than  that  on  the  Atlantic 
voyages,  but  it  would  certainly  have  demanded  a 

G 


98     THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

compass  with  a  much  finer  degree  of  adjustment. 
The  situation  is  therefore  suggestive  of  the  origin 
of  the  Piedra  de  Agua  or  calendar  stone,  more  especi 
ally  in  view  of  the  fact  that  we  find  it  in  a  place 
where  the  plainest  evidences  of  the  presence  of  the 
Phoenician  occupancy  exist. 

In  order  that  the  whole  scope  of  this  inquiry 
may  be  clearly  understood  it  will  now  be  necessary 
to  forge  again  some  of  the  links  that  in  a  remote 
past  seem  to  have  united  these  various  forms  of 
the  compass  in  a  common  symbol. 

The  Arabs,  as  was  indicated  in  an  earlier  chapter, 
were  from  the  beginning  the  most  intimate  neigh 
bours  of  the  Phoenicians.  Arabian  tribes  were 
their  carriers  and  commercial  correspondents  in 
connection  with  the  produce  of  the  Arabian  Penin 
sula.  It  is  not  surprising,  then,  that  we  find  them 
in  possession  of  a  compass,  which,  though  rude, 
fulfilled  all  their  needs.  The  Arabs  used  not  only 
the  bactellium  but  the  Phoenician  Star  in  the  prose 
cution  of  their  journeys,  and  the  relation  of  these 
two  facts  is,  to  say  the  least,  very  significant  of  the 
source  from  which  their  knowledge  was  derived. 
There  was,  moreover,  no  good  reason  why  the 
Phoenicians  should  have  withheld  this  information 
from  the  Arabs.  Every  reason  indeed  was  present 
why  they  should  not  have  withheld  knowledge  that 
would  safeguard  the  transportation  of  the  valuable 
merchandise  of  the  central  and  southern  markets 
of  that  country  on  which  they  were  so  dependent 
for  their  Mediterranean  trade. 

Koulak  Kibdjalick,  an  Arabian  author,  who 
made  a  voyage  across  the  Indian  Ocean  in  A.D.  1242, 
describes  vividly  the  manufacture  of  one  of  these 
primitive  compasses  under  his  own  observation. 


PHOENICIANS    AND    THE    COMPASS      99 

It  incorporated  all  that  was  thought  to  be  necessary 
when  the  bactellium  was  first  applied  to  navigation, 
and  at  that  early  period  seems  to  have  been  such 
common  property  that  the  mariners  did  not  hesitate 
to  make  it  known  to  a  stranger.  Says  the  traveller  : 
'  They  took  a  cup  of  water  which  they  sheltered 
from  the  wind,  they  then  took  a  needle  which  they 
fixed  on  a  reed  or  straw  so  as  to  form  a  cross,  they 
then  took  the  loadstone  in  their  hand  and  turned  it 
round  for  some  time  above  the  cup,  moving  from 
left  to  right,  the  needle  following ;  they  then  with 
drew  the  loadstone,  after  which  the  needle  stood 
still  pointing  north  and  south/' 

It  will  be  evident  from  what  has  been  said  that 
the  earliest  statement  from  Arabian  sources  does 
not  afford  us  any  more  satisfactory  light  on  the 
origin  of  the  compass  than  does  the  Chinese  stories. 
And  this  will  be  more  evident  as  we  proceed,  for  it 
will  be  found  that  all  the  information  conveyed  by 
this  Arabian  author  was  possessed  by  the  Icelanders 
400  years  before  this  date,  a  fact  all  the  more  start 
ling  because  we  can  establish  no  historic  connection 
between  either  China  or  Arabia  and  Iceland. 

But  there  is  very  little  difficulty  in  tracing  the 
movements  of  the  compass  in  its  progress  from 
Phoenicia  to  Europe.  Exasperated  at  the  assist 
ance  which  the  Phoenician  seamen  rendered  to  the 
Persians  in  their  wars  against  the  Greek  States, 
Alexander  the  Great  determined  on  an  expedition 
with  a  view  to  terminating  for  all  time  the  menace 
which  this  co-operation  presented  to  his  absolute 
sovereignty  of  the  ancient  world.  He  therefore  set 
about  the  reduction  of  the  Phoenician  towns  and  the 
destruction  of  their  fleets.  After  a  relentless  war 
he  secured  not  only  the  capitulation  of  the  main 


ioo    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Phoenician  towns,  but  he  took  island  Tyre  by 
storm  and  massacred  8000  of  the  inhabitants. 

It  was,  however,  through  the  erection  of  Alex 
andria  much  more  than  the  destruction  of  island 
Tyre  that  the  purposes  of  the  conqueror  Alexander 
in  the  ruin  of  the  Phoenician  hegemony  were  secured, 
for  Alexandria  was  speedily  transferred  to  that  proud 
pre-eminence  as  the  great  emporium  of  the  trade 
between  the  East  and  West  that  had  for  so  many 
centuries  been  the  distinction  of  the  Phoenician 
towns. 

Shortly  after  the  rise  of  Alexandria  came  the 
death  of  the  Greek  conqueror,  and  Tyre,  which  had 
ceased  to  be  a  city,  speedily  sprung  into  life  again. 
But  its  greatness  as  a  naval  port  and  the  central 
emporium  for  the  eastern  and  western  trade  was  a 
thing  of  the  past.  Carthage  meanwhile  had  sprung 
into  power,  peopled  with  the  fugitives  from  the 
Phoenician  towns.  These  carried  to  their  new  home 
not  only  an  intimate  knowledge  of  the  western 
Mediterranean  trade,  which  speedily  became  tribu 
tary  to  their  port,  but  also  the  ability  to  administer 
the  government  of  Carthage  and  stimulate  the 
commerce  of  the  adjacent  regions.  The  usual  result 
from  such  a  division  followed.  Alexandria,  profit 
ing  by  the  disaster  to  Tyre  and  the  growth  of 
Carthage  which  began  to  monopolise  the  western 
trade,  steadily  grew  in  importance  and  wealth,  so 
that  the  great  Alexandria  corn  ships  soon  took 
the  place  of  the  stately  ships  of  Tharshish. 

Of  all  the  nations  engaged  in  the  eastern  Medi 
terranean  business  the  Italians  had  the  shortest 
and  most  direct  voyage  to  make  in  order  to  reach 
Alexandria,  so  that  a  practical  monopoly  of  the 
eastern  trade  fell  into  their  hands  before  the  end  of 


PHCENICIANS    AND    THE    COMPASS     101 

the  thirteenth  century  A.D.  First  among  the  Italian 
cities  to  profit  by  this  change  were  Amalfi  and  Pisa. 
It  was  as  the  result  of  the  transference  of  the  Tyrian 
trade  to  Alexandria  and  the  growth  of  Amalfi  to  be 
an  independent  republic  regulating  the  commerce 
between  Alexandria  and  Italy,  that  the  compass 
made  its  appearance  in  a  definite  commercial  form. 

It  has  been  claimed  that  the  compass  was  first 
introduced  into  Italy  from  China  by  Marco  Polo, 
the  Venetian  traveller,  in  A.D.  1260.  This  claim  is 
largely  based  on  the  fact  that  the  Amalfi  and  Chinese 
compasses  used  the  same  method  of  suspending 
the  needle.  It  does  not,  however,  accord  with 
other  well-established  historic  facts,  for  a  reference 
to  the  use  of  a  rude  compass  as  early  as  A.D.  868  is 
made  by  Hanstein  in  a  quotation  from  an  Icelandic 
historian  of  the  eleventh  century.  He  again  is 
followed  by  Alexander  Neckham,  the  foster  brother 
of  Richard  Cceur  de  Lion,  who  speaks  of  the  instru 
ment  not  as  a  secret  of  the  learned,  but  as  a  guide 
of  the  mariner.  Guiot  de  Provence  also  sheds  some 
light  on  the  hold  which  the  compass  had  taken  on 
the  public  mind  of  his  day  in  a  poem  dated  A.D.  1190. 
Says  he,  "  The  mariner  can  sail  to  the  north  star 
without  seeing  it  by  simply  following  the  needle 
floating  on  a  straw  in  a  basin  of  water  after  it  has 
been  touched  with  the  magnet/'  Brunetto  Latini, 
author  of  Le  Tresor  and  Dante's  tutor,  refers  to  a 
visit  to  Roger  Bacon  in  A.D.  1258,  when  the  friar 
showed  him  the  magnet  and  explained  its  properties. 
The  Cardinal  de  Vitray,  who  visited  Palestine  during 
the  fourth  Crusade,  also  refers  to  the  instrument. 
In  chapter  xci.  of  his  Historia  Orientalis  he  notes 
the  use  of  the  bactellium  in  almost  identical  terms 
to  Guiot  de  Provence.  He  says,  "  The  needle  after 


102      THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

contact  with  the  magnetic  stone  constantly  turns 
to  the  north  star  which,  as  the  axis  of  the  firmament, 
remains  immovable,  whilst  the  others  revolve,  and 
hence  it  is  essentially  necessary  to  those  who  navi 
gate  the  ocean  "—words  as  explicit  as  they  are 
remarkable. 

From  these  references  it  should  be  clear  that  the 
form  in  which  the  primitive  compass  was  familiar 
to  all  the  early  navigating  nations  was  either  the 
bactellium  or  loadstone  or  the  magnetised  needle. 

As  to  the  Chinese  claim  to  the  invention  the 
documents  already  referred  to  determine  absolutely 
nothing.  The  Chinese  were  not  deep  water  sailors. 
They  were  river  navigators,  and  although  they  seem 
to  have  cultivated  the  coasting  trade  they  did  not 
venture  out  of  sight  of  land,  being  ignorant  of  the 
islands  adjacent  to  their  own  shores.  Even  the 
large  island  of  Formosa  was  unknown  to  them  until 
it  was  discovered  by  the  Dutch. 

To  sum  up,  we  seem  to  have  no  option  but  to 
turn  away  from  China,  Arabia,  Amain,  and  all 
other  sources  to  Phoenicia  if  we  would  obtain  any 
satisfactory  solution  of  the  difficulty  that  has  for 
so  long  surrounded  the  origin  of  the  compass.  It 
should  now  be  apparent  that  five  things  were 
necessarily  involved  in  the  evolution  of  the  compass, 
and  that  at  least  four  of  these  were  intimately 
identified  with  the  national  life  of  Phoenicia, 
(i)  The  invention  of  the  bactellium  or  suspended 
magnet  and  the  observation  that  its  vibrant,  life 
like  movement  only  continued  so  long  as  the  instru 
ment  remained  out  of  the  Polar  direction.  (2)  The 
knowledge  that  the  Phoenician  or  Pole  Star  was  the 
only  constant  star  in  the  firmament,  and  therefore 
supremely  valuable  to  the  traveller  by  land  and  by 


PHOENICIANS    AND    THE    COMPASS       103 

sea.  (3)  A  sea  and  land  trade  of  so  extensive  a 
character  that  it  would  be  impossible  to  conceive 
of  it  being  conducted  without  the  possession  of  such 
an  instrument.  (4)  That  the  later  forms  of  the 
compass  point  clearly  to  their  derivation  from  the 
first  rude  bactellium.  (5)  That  a  connection  should 
have  been  established  between  the  Polar  directive 
properties  of  the  suspended  bactellium  and  the 
Phoenician  or  Pole  Star.  In  answering  this  last 
point  as  to  whether  there  is  any  sufficient  reason 
for  believing  that  the  Phoenicians  did  establish  this 
connection  between  the  Polar  directive  properties 
of  the  suspended  magnet  and  the  Phoenician  Star 
which  solved  the  great  problem  of  navigation  for 
all  time,  we  at  the  same  time  settle  the  question  of 
the  origin  of  the  compass. 

Now  it  is  important  to  remember  that  the  in 
vention  of  the  bactellium  and  the  discovery  of  the 
Pole  Star  are  peculiarly  Phoenician,  no  nation  of 
antiquity  but  Phoenicia  laying  claim  to  either. 
Furthermore,  it  was  through  the  discovery  of  this 
star  that  a  means  was  found  by  which  to  steer  the 
compass.  It  cannot,  however,  be  supposed  that 
Phoenician  navigation  can  be  explained  by  the 
mere  fact  of  their  having  discovered  the  Pole  Star, 
for  centuries  after  the  death  of  Ouranos  the  trend  of 
their  navigation  was  in  a  direction  where  the  Pole 
Star  could  not  be  seen.  If,  therefore,  it  was  used  as 
a  constant  it  must  have  been  through  the  medium 
of  such  an  instrument  as  the  bactellium,  which  was 
capable  of  locating  its  position  when  the  object  to 
which  it  pointed  was  not  in  sight. 

Apart  therefore  from  a  definite  statement  from 
the  Phoenicians  themselves  as  to  the  use  to  which 
the  bactellium  was  applied,  there  can  be  no  question 


104     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND   AMERICA 

that  they  were  not  only  capable  of  establishing  but 
actually  did  establish  the  connection  existing  between 
the  Polar  directive  power  of  the  bactellium  and  the 
Phoenician  Star,  and  so  used  it  in  their  navigation. 
The  paramount  value  of  the  compass  to  the  Phoeni 
cians  was  undoubtedly  the  cause  of  their  long  reten 
tion  of  the  secret  of  its  existence  at  least  on  the 
Mediterranean  coasts,  for  there  was  much  to  be 
feared,  as  they  found,  from  Greek  expansion. 

It  has  been  said  with  a  considerable  show  of 
learning  that  sea  charts  did  not  exist  until  the  end 
of  the  thirteenth  century  A.D.  This  is  clearly  a 
mistake.  It  is  probable  that  the  first  Italian  or 
Pisan  compass  charts  which  cover  the  whole  Medi 
terranean  belong  to  this  period.  The  first,  of  which 
we  have  any  exact  information,  are  those  of  P. 
Visconti  in  A.D.  1311,  and  these  seem  to  have  been 
made  from  data  obtained  in  the  same  manner  as 
that  ascribed  by  Herodotus  (iii.  136)  to  the  Phoe 
nicians,  who,  he  says,  "  surveyed  the  coasts  of  Hellas, 
taking  notes  in  writing/'  Either  of  these  charts 
would,  however,  have  been  of  very  little  value  to 
seamen  if  they  had  not  been  correctly  platted  by  a 
compass  and  the  seas  they  represented  navigated 
by  the  same  instrument.  So  that  we  may  fairly 
enough  assume  that  all  that  was  involved  in  the 
discovery  and  invention  of  the  bactellium  and 
compass  was  clearly  of  Phoenician  origin. 

Well  may  the  prophet  Ezekiel  (xxviii.  3)  say  of 
such  people,  "  Behold  thou  art  wiser  than  Daniel, 
there  is  no  secret  that  they  can  hide  from  thee." 


CHAPTER   V 

PHOENICIAN   AND   JEW   IN   CO-OPERATION 

Phoenician  desire  for  Eastern  expansion — Trade  with  India — Persian 
Gulf  Settlements  the  base  of  more  distant  navigation — Phoenicians 
and  Israelites  unite  for  commercial  purposes — Friendship  of  Hiram, 
King  of  Tyre,  and  David,  King  of  Israel — Its  important  results — 
Phoenicia's  obligations  to  the  Jewish  people — Jewish  influence  on 
Phoenician  religious  thought — Commercial  treaty  of  Solomon  and 
Hiram — How  it  profited  both  countries — Fleet  of  Solomon  and 
Hiram  and  its  destination — Phoenicians  as  silver  importers. 

THE  two  great  empires  which  grew  up  side  by  side 
on  the  banks  of  the  Tigris  and  Euphrates  were  so 
closely  united  that  the  temporary  power  of  the  one 
was  simply  the  measure  of  the  weakness  of  the 
other,  both  territories  possessing  the  same  racial 
types,  speaking  the  same  language,  and  historically 
passing  through  the  same  changes. 

Until  very  recent  years  it  was  customary  to 
speak  of  this  entire  region  as  Assyria,1  but  later 
research  makes  it  plain  that  the  first  place  should 
have  been  accorded  Babylonia,  since,  with  the  ex 
ception  of  a  few  centuries,  Assyria  seems  always  to 
have  occupied  a  subordinate  position.  This  at 
least  is  the  Scriptural  view,  for  in  Genesis  x.  10  the 
first  foundations  of  Nimrod  are  made  to  include 
Babel  and  Accad  in  the  land  of  Shinar.  This  view 
is  further  supported  by  the  fact  that  the  arts, 
science,  literature,  and  religion  of  Assyria  always 
bore  the  impress  of  Babylonia.  We  will  not 
therefore  impeach  the  veracity  of  history  if  we 

1  Ency.  Brit. 
105 


io6    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

speak  of  the  territory  so  embraced  as  Babylonia 
rather  than  Assyria.  Up  to  the  year  1130  B.C. 
Babylonia  was  the  great  centre  of  science,  art, 
trade,  and  manufacture  in  eastern  Asia,  and  at  the 
same  time  the  seat  of  the  dominant  power  of  the 
East.  In  the  year  referred  to,  however,  the  rise  to 
power  of  Tiglath  Pileser  I  of  Assyria  created  a 
period  of  serious  unrest  throughout  all  Syria  and 
Mesopotamia,  which  resulted  in  Babylonia  becoming 
for  a  time  a  dependency  of  Assyria.  The  paralysis 
of  the  Babylonian  trade  resulting  from  the  wide 
spread  operation  of  this  monarch's  forces,  and  the 
rise  to  almost  supreme  power  of  Assyria  in  eastern 
Asia,  provided  an  opportunity  for  eastern  trade 
expansion  that  seems  to  have  been  eagerly  seized 
by  the  Phoenicians,  whose  emporia  on  the 
Persian  Gulf  provided  that  wealth  of  imported  and 
manufactured  wares  of  Tyrian  and  Sidonian  woven 
and  dyed  stuffs  and  the  products  of  the  Indian, 
Arabian,  and  Egyptian  markets,  of  which  Babylonia 
at  that  time  stood  in  need. 

This  market  was  one  with  which  the  Phoenicians 
had  been  familiar  from  the  beginning,  and  it  was 
from  their  association  with  it  that  the  inspiration 
of  much  of  Phoenicia's  skill  in  gem  engraving, 
weaving,  and  dyeing  was  derived.  While,  there 
fore,  the  campaigns  of  Tiglath  Peleser  were  para 
lysing  commerce  on  the  Syrian  caravan  routes,  the 
Phoenicians,  by  means  of  their  emporia  on  the 
Bahrein  Islands,  were  able  to  enter  Babylonia  with 
their  own  products  and  those  of  the  Egyptian, 
Arabian,  and  Indian  markets.  It  is,  however, 
scarcely  possible  to  believe  that  the  Phoenicians, 
who  were  notorious  for  their  business  sagacity,  did 
not,  while  rejoicing  in  the  success  of  their  operations 


PHOENICIAN    AND    JEW  107 

in  the  East,  recognise  the  precariousness  of  the  tenure 
they  had  secured  in  the  Babylonian  markets. 

The  main  trend  of  the  colonial  development  of 
the  Phoenicians  prior  to  this  date  had  been,  as  we 
have  already  shown,  mainly  in  a  western  direction. 
Indeed  from  the  situation  of  their  home  ports  it 
could  hardly  be  otherwise,  for  their  true  dominion 
never  extended  either  to  the  Persian  Gulf  nor  to 
the  Red  Sea.  As  soon,  however,  as  the  land  trade 
through  Asia  became  paralysed  by  reason  of  the 
unrest  in  Babylonia  the  Indian  trade  via  Crocola, 
the  modern  Kurachi  at  the  mouth  of  the  Indus, 
and  that  of  Ceylon,  which  found  its  natural  outlet 
either  at  the  Bahrein  Islands  or  at  Hydramaut  and 
Yemen,  received  more  careful  attention.  This  terri 
tory  was  not  only  the  first  but  remained  until  the 
later  Assyrian  period,  the  most  valuable  to  the 
Phoenicians.  It  is  reasonable,  therefore,  to  suppose 
that  the  need  of  further  expansion  eastward  with  a 
view  to  securing  their  hold  on  the  commerce  of  the 
territory  then  in  their  possession,  was  not  lost  sight 
of.  Evidences  of  such  a  movement  reaching  back 
to  a  very  remote  period  are  not  wanting,  for  the 
retention  of  their  trade  connection  with  the  Bahrein 
Islands  and  their  use  of  the  Egyptian  port  of 
Hierapolis  on  the  Red  Sea,  which  must  have  provided 
a  very  powerful  leverage  on  the  Babylonian  and 
Egyptian  markets,  make  it  apparent  that  a  further 
development  in  the  East,  paralleling  that  in  the  Westr 
was  an  object  which  the  Phoenicians  had  cherished 
with  the  utmost  eagerness. 

It  is  extremely  unfortunate  that  we  know  so 
little  about  the  Persian  Gulf  settlements  and  the 
movements  which  took  place  from  them.  Al 
though  their  possession  of  the  ivory,  ebony,  pearls, 


io8     THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

and  cinnamon  of  India  and  Ceylon  indicate  that 
from  a  very  early  period  the  Phoenicians  had  an 
intimate  acquaintance  with  the  Deccan  and  the 
East  Indian  peninsulas  and  islands,  they  could  not 
have  been  the  sole  possessors  of  this  trade,  for  the 
Chaldseans  equally  with  the  Phoenicians  had  a  share 
in  it  (Ezek.  xxvii.  15).  So  far  as  can  be  gathered 
this  business  was  not  conducted  from  Phoenicia 
direct,  but  like  the  trade  with  the  Cassiterides,  the 
shores  of  England,  and  the  Baltic,  which  was 
controlled  by  the  Gadeans,  seems  to  have  been 
handled  by  the  Dedanites,  who  inhabited  the  islands 
in  the  Bay  of  Gerrha  and  controlled  the  navigation 
of  the  Persian  Gulf  and  the  Indian  seas. 

That  a  considerable  navigation  existed  on  the 
Persian  Gulf  carried  on  by  the  Chaldaeans,  "  whose 
cry  is  in  the  ships  "  (Isa.  xliii.  14),  and  by  the  Phoe 
nicians  through  their  correspondents  the  Dedan 
ites,  there  is  no  room  to  doubt.  Some  light  on  the 
matter  is  obtainable  from  a  consideration  of  the 
nature  of  the  commodities  which  were  exported. 
These  were  ivory,  precious  stones,  pearls,  ebony, 
cinnamon,  apes,  and  peacocks,  the  latter  of  which 
could  only  have  been  obtained  from  Java  and 
Sumatra,  the  native  home  of  the  bird,  or  from  the 
islands  adjoining  the  Indian  peninsula.  This  clearly 
indicates  that  from  a  very  early  period  the  ex 
tremities  of  the  Asiatic  continent  to  the  south-east 
had  been  made  tributary  to  the  trade  of  the  Bahrein 
Islands  (2  Chron.  ix.  21). 

In  view  therefore  of  the  tremendous  expansion 
which  had  taken  place  in  Phoenician  commerce 
towards  the  West,  it  is  not  surprising  to  find  traces 
of  an  effort  on  the  part  of  the  establishments  on 
the  Bahrein  Islands  to  obtain  some  corresponding 


PHOENICIANS    AND    JEW  109 

information  with  respect  to  the  resources  of  the 
further  East.  Emporia  like  these  at  the  entrance 
to  the  Persian  Gulf  in  the  hands  of  so  enterprising 
and  progressive  a  people  as  the  Phoenicians  naturally 
leads  us  to  assume  a  more  distant  navigation  than 
the  mouth  of  the  Indus  or  Ceylon.  The  same  causes 
which  operated  to  bring  about  the  western  develop 
ments  and  draw  Tharshish  and  the  English  coasts 
within  the  sphere  of  their  commerce  were  equally 
at  work  here,  for  the  Babylonians,  who  had  so  long 
dominated  the  eastern  trade  and  the  Indian  and 
Arabian  markets,  were  still  a  power  to  be  reckoned 
with  although  suffering  temporary  eclipse. 

It  is  necessary,  then,  to  view  the  colonies  on  the 
Persian  Gulf  not  as  the  end  of  Phoenician  navigation 
to  the  East,  but,  like  Gades  in  the  west  (which  formed 
the  base  from  which  the  Atlantic  and  Baltic  trade 
was  handled),  as  the  starting  point  for  more  distant 
navigation.  Fortunately,  there  is  a  mass  of  un 
digested  historic  data  that  leaves  no  room  for  doubt 
that  the  enterprises  were  directed  to  very  remote 
regions.  As  the  elucidation  of  this  phase  of  our 
problem  comes,  however,  more  naturally  within  the 
scope  of  another  branch  of  our  inquiry,  we  will  leave 
the  subject  at  this  point  for  the  present,  contenting 
ourselves  with  having  called  attention  to  the  need 
which  existed  at  that  time  for  expansion  in  the  East. 

The  great  developments  which  took  place  in 
Phoenician  naval  construction  and  navigation  on 
the  Mediterranean  were,  as  we  have  already  shown, 
brought  about  by  two  causes.  The  first  was  the 
practically  unlimited  quantity  of  durable  and  easily 
worked  timber  found  on  the  mountain  chains 
which  surrounded  their  new  homes,  and  was  like 
wise  obtainable  from  the  adjacent  Cyprus,  which 


no    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

later  became  the  rendezvous  of  the  Phoenician 
fleets.  The  second  was  the  nature  of  the  navigation 
which  the  residence  of  the  Phoenicians  on  the  eastern 
shores  of  the  Mediterranean  imposed.  More  strongly 
built  and  roomier  craft  were  necessary  when  their 
commercial  operations  and  the  establishment  of 
their  more  pretentious  colonies  drew  them  westward. 

But  there  was  no  special  need  for  such  naval 
developments  on  the  Persian  Gulf.  Yet  vessels  of 
considerable  tonnage  seem,  from  the  Hebrew  narra 
tive  (2  Chron.  viii.  18),  to  have  been  employed  there. 
Can  there  be  any  other  explanation  than  that  these 
vessels  were  specially  constructed  with  a  view  to 
investigating  the  possibilities  of  a  further  eastern 
expansion  ? 

Whatever  causes  may  have  led  to  the  system  of 
expansion  at  the  Bahrein  Islands,  there  can  be  no 
doubt  that  this  system  of  expansion  was  inaugu 
rated  in  the  East  equally  with  the  West,  and  that 
the  developments  which  resulted  were  of  so  far 
reaching  a  character  as  to  rivet  the  attention  of  the 
nation  for  some  time  to  the  exclusion  of  matters 
nearer  home. 

Somewhere  about  the  middle  or  end  of  the 
eleventh  century  B.C.  information  of  a  somewhat 
startling  character  with  respect  to  discoveries  in 
the  further  East  paralleling  those  made  in  Tharshish 
in  the  West  seem  to  have  reached  Phoenicia  through 
its  correspondents,  the  Dedanites.  The  informa 
tion  was  of  so  specific  and  definite  a  character  as 
to  create  an  international  departure  in  the  associa 
tion  of  Phoenicia  and  Palestine  in  business  enter 
prises  of  a  nature  that  has  probably  no  exact 
counterpart  in  history. 

About  the  beginning  of  the  eleventh  century  B.C. 


PHOENICIAN    AND    JEW  in 

David,  the  son  of  Jesse  the  Bethlehemite,  had  been 
anointed  king  of  Israel,  and  with  his  accession  to 
the  throne  the  commerce  of  the  Phoenicians  began 
to  be  of  the  most  prosperous  character.  Not  only 
was  the  territory  to  the  westward  in  their  undisputed 
possession  but  that  of  the  East  speedily  received  a 
new  commercial  value.  Phoenician  commerce  was 
at  the  same  time  strengthened  by  the  complete 
pacification  of  Palestine  owing  to  the  subjugation  of 
the  Canaanites  and  Philistines,  and  the  advantages 
accruing  from  the  institution  of  a  stable  govern 
ment  which  stimulated  a  mutual  exchange  of  com 
modities  between  the  two  kingdoms.  Phoenicia 
was  dependent  in  a  large  measure  on  Palestine  for 
its  supplies  of  foodstuffs,  its  wheat  and  barley,  its 
oil  and  wine,  and  Israel  was  equally  dependent  on 
the  Phoenician  markets  for  those  manufactured 
articles  and  luxuries  which  the  growing  independ 
ence  and  wealth  of  the  population  naturally  led 
them  to  desire. 

Stimulated  by  these  favouring  conditions  of 
mutual  advantage  the  association  between  Hiram, 
king  of  Tyre,  and  David,  king  of  Israel,  soon  came 
to  be  of  the  most  intimate  character,  and  resulted 
in  a  friendship  which  seems  to  have  continued 
unimpaired  throughout  the  varied  careers  of  the 
two  kings.  It  is  true  that  we  have  no  record  of 
personal  association  between  them,  but  that  such 
existed  may  reasonably  be  assumed  since  we  have 
the  explicit  statement  of  Scripture  (i  Kings  v.  i) 
that  Hiram  was  ever  a  lover  of  David,  an  assumption, 
moreover,  supported  by  the  fact  that  Hiram  built  a 
palace  for  the  king  of  Israel  in  recognition  of  this 
friendship  and  of  the  obligations  under  which 
Phoenicia  lay  to  David. 


H2    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

The  great  Syrian  campaign  of  David  did  more 
than  bring  about  the  voluntary  or  forced  submis 
sion  to  Israel  of  all  the  lesser  kingdoms  that  lay 
between  the  Orontes  and  the  Euphrates.  It  re 
duced  Damascus,  the  terminus  of  the  great  over 
land  routes  through  western  Asia  and  southern  and 
eastern  Arabia  to  the  Mediterranean  to  the  position 
of  a  Hebrew  dependency,  and  restored  to  a  state 
of  security  a  route  which  for  a  long  period  must 
have  been  viewed  by  the  Phoenicians  as  most  peril 
ous.  But  the  association  with  Israel  resulted  in 
even  more  important  advantages  to  Phoenicia.  In 
his  campaign  against  the  Edomites,  who  occupied 
the  hill  country  to  the  east  and  north  of  the  Red 
Sea,  David  raised  the  embargo  which  this  com 
mercial  nation  had  placed  on  the  navigation  of  the 
Red  Sea  towards  its  own  ports. 

With  the  object  of  these  campaigns  successfully 
accomplished  a  long  period  of  profound  peace  en 
sued,  advantageous  alike  to  Phoenicia  and  Palestine. 
This  period,  which  comprised  the  latter  half  of  the 
reign  of  King  David,  seems  to  have  been  devoted 
by  the  Jewish  king  to  gathering  tribute  from  the 
rulers  and  princes  of  the  subject  provinces  and  in 
the  reorganisation  of  the  kingdom  and  its  defences. 
Probably,  too,  it  was  devoted  to  cementing  the 
friendship  with  the  great  commercial  state  on  the 
sea  coast  and  to  consultations  with  Hiram  about 
plans  for  the  improvement  of  the  Israelitish  capital 
and  the  erection  of  a  magnificent  temple,  the  con 
struction  of  which  David  was  instructed  by  God 
to  entrust  to  his  son  Solomon  (i  Chron.  xxviii.  3). 

Whatever  the  financial  condition  of  Palestine 
may  have  been  under  the  rule  of  the  judges  of  King 
Saul,  there  is  evidence  that  at  this  period  a  new  and 


PHCENICIAN    AND    JEW  113 

startling  departure  from  the  primitive  simplicity 
of  the  national  life  took  place  and  continued  through 
out  the  latter  years  of  King  David's  reign.  At  his 
death  the  Jewish  monarch  bequeathed  to  his  son 
Solomon  not  only  the  most  minute  instructions 
relative  to  the  carrying  out  of  the  plans  for  the 
erection  of  a  temple  to  Jehovah,  but  enormous  sums 
of  money.  According  to  i  Chron.  xxii.  14  the 
actual  treasure  provided  by  King  David  for  the 
building  of  the  temple  amounted  to  one  hundred 
thousand  talents  of  gold  and  a  thousand  thousand 
talents  of  silver,  a  sum  calculated  by  Dr.  Hastings, 
editor  of  the  Dictionary  of  the  Bible,  to  be  equiva 
lent  to  £1,025,000,000  sterling,  but  by  Lever  and 
Prideaux  to  amount  to  £833,000,000  sterling. 

That  Hiram  was  intimately  familiar  with  David's 
plans  there  can  be  no  question,  for  in  the  final  design 
of  the  temple  there  was  observable  a  considerable 
departure  from  the  primitive  simplicity  of  the 
Tabernacle  structure  of  a  clearly  Phoenician  origin. 
Moreover,  immediately  after  the  accession  of  Solo 
mon  we  find  Hiram  taking  the  initiative  and  "  send 
ing  his  servants  unto  Solomon,  for  he  had  heard 
that  they  had  anointed  him  king  in  the  room  of 
his  father,  for  Hiram  was  ever  a  lover  of  David" 
(i  Kings  v.  i).  That  this  embassage  conveyed 
much  more  than  mere  congratulations  on  the  ac 
cession  of  a  neighbouring  prince  is  certain.  All 
the  probabilities  indeed  favour  the  view  that 
Solomon  and  Hiram  had  many  times  met  at  the 
summer  palace  in  Lebanon  constructed  for  David 
by  the  Tyrian  king  (2  Sam.  v.  n),  where  the  capti 
vating  personality  of  the  young  prince  could  not 
fail,  apart  from  the  fact  that  he  was  the  favourite 
son  of  the  great  Hebrew  monarch,  to  have  won  the 

H 


H4      THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

kindly  recognition  of  the  Phoenician  king.  At  all 
events  Solomon's  reply  to  the  Phoenician  embas- 
sage  was  of  such  a  familiar  character  as  to  warrant 
the  belief  that  a  definite  understanding  on  the  sub 
ject  of  the  erection  of  the  temple  existed  between 
David  and  Hiram,  and  that,  relying  on  the  strength 
of  a  friendship  cemented  by  many  years  of  intimate 
association,  Hiram  sought,  and  that  not  unadvisedly, 
a  continuance  of  the  good  understanding  that  had 
been  of  such  advantage  to  Phoenicia. 

As  a  means  to  this  end  Hiram's  embassy  seems 
to  have  made  overtures  to  the  young  monarch  to 
place  at  his  disposal  the  resources  of  Phoenicia  for 
the  furtherance  of  the  projects  which  had  been 
entrusted  to  Solomon's  care  by  his  father.  And 
this  proposal  must  have  been  warmly  welcomed  by 
Solomon,  for  his  people  at  that  time  were  devoid 
of  the  talent  necessary  to  the  successful  prosecution 
of  those  great  enterprises  which  had  been  entrusted 
to  his  care. 

The  beautification  of  Jerusalem  and  the  erection 
of  the  national  temple,  it  must  be  remembered,  were 
not  private  enterprises.  David  had  for  at  least  one 
half  of  his  reign  been  in  the  habit  of  levying  the 
enormous  tax  of  10  per  cent,  on  the  produce  of  the 
nation,  and  we  may  safely  assume,  from  the  loyalty 
of  the  king  to  his  religious  convictions,  that  the  tax 
had  a  specific  relation  to  the  purpose  for  which  it 
was  ultimately  used.  The  kingly  estate  in  Palestine 
during  this  formative  period,  even  when  closely 
associated  with  the  Phoenician  court  and  probably 
enough  taking  colour  from  it,  could  never  have 
demanded  for  its  own  support  such  a  drain  on  the 
resources  of  the  people  as  this  tax  represented. 
On  the  other  hand,  the  advantages  accruing  to 


PHOENICIAN    AND    JEW  115 

Phoenicia  through  the  final  pacification  of  the 
territory  contiguous  to  its  own  and  the  opening  of 
the  Red  Sea  ports  for  the  successful  control  of  the 
Yemen  or  Ophir  trade  were  benefits  which  did  not 
revert  to  Hiram  alone  but  to  Phoenicia  at  large. 
Both  time  and  circumstance,  therefore,  were  pre 
eminently  favourable  to  the  furtherance  of  these 
developments  sought  by  the  two  neighbouring 
kingdoms  and  their  respective  rulers.  The  over 
tures  of  Hiram  on  behalf  of  the  Phoenician  people 
to  consummate  the  promises  evidently  made  to 
David  during  his  lifetime,  were  not  only  such  as 
good  statecraft  would  have  suggested,  but  showed 
that  both  king  and  people  recognised  the  great 
obligation  under  which  they  rested  to  the  house  of 
David  and  to  the  Jewish  people.  It  was  none  the 
less  a  beautiful  and  touching  tribute  of  affection 
from  Hiram  to  the  young  king,  of  whose  father  he 
had  ever  been  a  warm  friend. 

In  order  to  understand  clearly  the  sequel  to  this 
exchange  of  courtesies  it  will  be  necessary  again 
to  emphasize  the  overwhelming  obligations  under 
which  Phoenicia  at  this  period  stood  to  the  Jewish 
kingdom,  for  the  sequel  of  these  overtures  presented 
a  startling  innovation  in  the  national  career  of  the 
Jews.  During  no  portion  of  its  history  but  this 
did  Palestine  exhibit  the  traits  of  an  aggressively 
territorial  mercantile  nation.  That  a  trade  may 
have  existed  between  the  Jews  and  the  carrying 
tribes  of  the  adjacent  deserts  with  a  view  to  securing 
myrrh  and  frankincense  for  the  temple  services  is 
extremely  probable,  but  this  trade  during  the  earlier 
period  could  only  have  been  of  the  most  limited 
character,  probably  amounting  to  nothing  more 
than  an  exchange  of  commodities.  The  whole 


n6    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

system  of  government  among  the  Hebrews,  no  less 
than  their  traditions  and  religion,  set  them  apart 
at  the  beginning  of  their  career  as  a  peculiar  and 
isolated  people  (Deut.  xiv.  2).  The  overtures  of 
Hiram  to  Solomon  could  not  fail,  therefore,  to  have 
been  viewed  with  grave  suspicion  by  the  priesthood, 
if  the  affection  existing  between  the  Tyrian  and  the 
Jewish  monarchs  had  not  had  its  root  in  a  religious 
sympathy  of  a  wholly  different  character  from  that 
which  could  have  been  possible  at  any  later  date,  for 
between  the  pure  and  exalted  worship  of  Jehovah  and 
that  of  Baal  there  was  a  whole  world  of  difference. 

It  is  supposed,  and  with  good  reason,  that  the 
personal  influence  of  David  over  Hiram  may  have 
been  a  factor  of  no  small  importance  in  producing 
a  modification  in  the  trend  of  Phoenician  religious 
thought  and  practice.  Certainly  the  intensely  re 
ligious  nature  of  Hiram  shows  in  these  communi 
cations  with  the  Jewish  king  strong  leanings  towards 
the  early  cult  of  the  Semites,  which  in  itself  may 
account  for  the  magnificent  contribution  of  one 
hundred  and  twenty  talents  of  gold  or  about 
£40,000  sterling,  which  Hiram  made  for  the  adorn 
ment  of  the  temple  at  Jerusalem  (i  Kings  ix.  14), 
as  well  as  the  complacent  acceptance  of  the 
situation  by  the  Jewish  priesthood.  Were  we  in 
possession  of  a  detailed  and  authoritative  state 
ment  regarding  the  progress  of  Phoenician  religious 
thought,  it  would  probably  be  found  that  the 
spiritual  conception  of  the  Deity  received  a  peculiar 
emphasis  at  this  period.  Originally  the  Phoe 
nicians,  like  the  Jews,  were  monotheists,  and  pos 
sessed  a  lofty  estimate  of  the  power  which  created 
and  ruled  the  universe,  whom  they  called  El-great, 
Baal-lord,  Bel-samin,  lord  of  heaven.  But  this 


PHCENICIAN    AND    JEW  117 

belief  was  soon  overlaid  and  corrupted  by  means 
of  the  tribal  totemism  which  was  always  a  marked 
feature  of  the  Semitic  belief,  with  the  result  that 
the  different  names  of  God  passed  by  degrees  into 
the  nomenclature  of  different  gods.  Polytheism 
and  religious  symbolism  then  took  the  place  of  the 
primitive  monotheism.  Be  that  as  it  may,  it  re 
quires  no  special  sagacity  to  realise  that  Phoenicia, 
while  dominated  by  so  masterful  a  sovereign  as 
Hiram,  who  was  in  affectionate  sympathy  with 
the  pre-eminently  religious  monotheist,  —  at  that 
time  master  of  all  Syria, — may  have  thrown  the 
whole  weight  of  its  influence  towards  bringing  into 
life  again  the  earlier  and  purer  ideas  of  the  national 
religious  cult. 

The  tendency  to  religious  symbolism  was  not 
confined  to  Phoenicia.  Traces  of  it  are  clearly 
visible  in  Hebrew  literature,  where  the  Lord  God  is 
represented  as  a  sun  and  shield  (Psalms  Ixxxiv.  n). 
This  view  receives  still  further  emphasis  in  Numbers 
xxi.  8,  where  incense  is  offered  to  the  brazen  serpent 
of  Moses  (2  Kings  xviii.  4).  It  is  probable,  there 
fore,  that  the  primitive  conceptions  of  the  Hebrews, 
which  in  some  measure  survived  in  their  later  and 
purer  belief,  may  not  have  differed  in  any  marked 
degree  from  those  of  the  Phoenicians  (whose  prin 
cipal  symbols  were  the  sun  and  the  serpent)  when 
their  common  ancestors  occupied  the  plains  that 
lay  between  the  Tigris  and  Euphrates. 

Whether  the  commercial  treaty  which  arose  out 
of  this  rapprochement  between  Solomon  and  Hiram 
was  in  the  first  place  international  in  its  scope  is 
uncertain,  even  though  we  view  it  as  resulting  in 
the  erection  of  the  fortified  cities  of  Petra,  Gezer, 
Baalath,  and  Tadmor  or  Palmyra  in  the  wilderness 


n8    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

(i  Kings  ix.  16  ff.),  in  which  the  merchandise  collected 
by  the  various  caravans  might  be  stored  for  further 
distribution.  Indeed  all  the  probabilities  indicate 
that  the  partnership  partook  of  the  nature  of  a 
monopoly  conducted  for  the  private  advantage  of 
the  two  sovereigns. 

The  annual  income  of  Solomon  is  stated  in 
i  Kings  x.  14  and  2  Chron.  ix.  13  to  have  amounted 
to  six  hundred  and  sixty-six  talents  of  gold  or  a  little 
more  than  £4,000,000  sterling.  But,  besides  pay 
ments  in  money,  he  received  payments  in  kind  both 
from  his  own  subjects  and  from  the  subject  princes, 
so  that  his  income  from  all  sources  was  not  less  than 
six  or  eight  million  pounds  sterling  per  annum,  a 
sum  which  would  represent  a  very  literal  fulfilment 
of  the  promise  (i  Kings  iii.  13),  "I  have  also  given 
thee  that  which  thou  hast  not  asked,  both  riches 
and  honour ;  so  that  there  shall  not  be  any  among 
the  kings  like  unto  thee  all  thy  days/' 

The  chief  place  among  the  Phoenician  cities 
which  from  the  beginning  seems  to  have  been 
occupied  by  Sidon  was  transferred  to  Tyre  about 
1250  B.C.,  when  Sidon  was  besieged  and  taken  by 
the  Philistine  king  of  Ascalon.  It  is  an  open 
question  whether  the  commercial  causes  to  which 
we  have  already  referred  did  not  operate  to  bring 
about  the  change  without  the  intervention  of  this 
extraneous  cause.  The  commercial  ascendancy  of 
the  city  took  place  about  1250  B.C.,  when  the  results 
of  the  western  expansion  and  the  opening  of  Thar- 
shish  began  to  be  felt.  From  that  date  Tyre  con 
tinued  in  the  ascendant  for  a  period  of  about  400 
years  when,  owing  to  the  defection  and  flight  of 
Dido,  Carthage  was  founded  by  the  fugitives  from 
Tyre. 


PHCENICIAN    AND    JEW  119 

There  seems  to  be  no  room  vf or  question  as  to  this 
being  the  correct  view  of  the  situation,  for  it  was  at 
this  period  that  the  advantages  to  be  derived  from 
an  extension  of  their  colonial  system  seems  to  have 
been  most  clearly  recognised  by  the  Phoenicians. 
It  was  then  also  that  her  merchants  began  to  realise 
the  uncertainty  of  their  hold  on  the  great  centres 
of  trade  on  the  eastern  Mediterranean.  Fortunately 
this  did  not  occur  before  the  period  when  Phoenician 
expansion  to  the  westward  had  become  so  profitable 
that  the  nation  could,  without  serious  inconvenience 
to  its  trade,  transfer  its  activities  to  regions  where 
friction  and  competition  were  non-existent. 

Phoenicia,  at  a  time  of  unparalleled  commercial 
expansion,  could  very  well  afford  to  consider  how 
it  could  best  utilise  to  its  own  advantage  the  growing 
resources  of  the  new  kingdom  in  Palestine.  Hiram 
had  in  some  measure  already  paved  the  way  to  this 
more  intimate  association  by  erecting  for  David  a 
palace  in  keeping  with  his  kingly  dignity.  But 
this  was  not  sufficient.  It  was  also  necessary  to 
cement  a  union  between  the  two  nations,  and  to 
this  Hiram  devoted  his  energies. 

Phoenicia  was  a  purely  commercial  state,  and 
was  wholly  dependent  on  a  mercenary  force  for  its 
defence.  Israel,  on  the  other  hand,  constantly 
liable  to  attack  on  every  hand,  possessed  an  army 
on  foot  of  240,000  men,  who  served  David  without 
expense  to  the  State  (i  Chron.  xxviii.  i).  When, 
however,  war  broke  out  during  David's  reign 
288,000  men  and  12,000  officers,  or  an  effective 
fighting  force  of  300,000  men,  were  available  at  a 
moment's  notice.  But  the  ambition  of  Solomon 
does  not  seem  to  have  been  satisfied  with  even  this 
provision,  for,  with  the  extension  of  the  boundaries 


120    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

of  the  kingdom  and  Jewish  participation  in  the 
eastern  commerce,  arrangements  were  made  for  the 
erection  of  a  number  of  fortified  cities  and  outposts 
which  necessitated  a  large  increase  in  the  standing 
army.  We  have  no  specific  statement  in  the  Scrip 
tures  as  to  the  additions  to  Solomon's  forces  during 
his  reign,  but  we  are  probably  not  very  far  off  the 
mark  if,  during  the  period  of  greatest  expansion, 
we  apply  to  it  the  figures  recorded  with  respect  to 
the  reign  of  Jehoshaphat,  who  did  not  extend  the 
boundaries  of  the  Solomonic  empire.  According  to 
2  Chron.  xvii.  12  the  army  of  Jehoshaphat  amounted 
to  one  million  one  hundred  and  eighty  thousand 
men  besides  the  garrisons  in  the  fenced  cities. 

The  magnanimity  of  Hiram  and  of  the  Phoe 
nician  people  towards  the  Jewish  king  and  his 
subjects  is  therefore  easily  understood,  although 
the  situation  does  not  in  any  way  militate  against 
the  sentiments  that  may  have  actuated  Hiram  as 
an  individual  in  the  proposals  he  made  to  Solomon. 
So  far  as  history  sheds  light  on  the  subject,  the 
Phoenicians,  while  under  the  protection  of  Israel, 
were  never  called  on  to  pay  tribute,  so  that  their 
proposals  with  respect  to  the  erection  of  the  temple 
and  a  participation  in  commercial  enterprises  set 
ting  out  from  parts  under  Jewish  jurisdiction  was, 
to  say  the  least,  statesmanlike.  Moreover,  these 
proposals  could  not  fail  to  be  of  great  advantage  to 
both  peoples.  Solomon  needed  a  temple  and  palaces, 
and  desired  the  enlargement  and  beautification  of 
his  capital,  objects  which  Hebrew  skill  and  resources 
could  not  provide.  Hiram,  on  the  other  hand, 
required  protection  for  Phoenician  commerce,  ports 
for  his  shipping  on  the  Red  Sea,  and  a  granary 
from  which  supplies  for  the  support  of  the  teeming 


PHOENICIAN    AND    JEW  121 

populations  of  the  Phoenician  towns  could  be  drawn. 
Out  of  this  common  need  and  the  desire  and  ability 
to  meet  it  arose  these  favouring  conditions  which 
led  to  a  conjunction  of  the  forces  of  Phoenicia  and 
Palestine  culminating  in  those  joint  expeditions 
which  led  to  such  far-reaching  results. 

The  initiative  towards  this  desirable  end  seems 
to  have  been  taken  by  Hiram.  According  to 
Eusebius  (prczp.  Evan.  x.  99)  a  marriage  was  con 
tracted  between  Solomon  and  a  daughter  of  Hiram 
as  the  most  satisfactory  way  of  cementing  the 
union.  This  was  followed  later  by  a  marriage 
with  the  daughter  of  Pharaoh  Vapres  (prcep.  Evan, 
ii.  30),  who  is  said  to  have  sent  as  a  marriage  portion 
80,000  workmen  to  assist  in  the  building  of  the 
temple.  The  time  was  peculiarly  opportune  for  the 
prosecution  of  this  enterprise.  A  profound  peace, 
which  the  Jewish  nation  then  enjoyed  as  the  result 
of  the  aggressive  policy  of  David,  stimulated  the 
industries  of  the  entire  population.  Abundant 
labour  was  available.  The  tribes  beyond  the 
Jordan  had  become  rich  by  plundering  the  Hagar- 
ines,  and  found  a  ready  market  for  their  cattle. 
The  agricultural  tribes  again  enjoyed  a  soil  and 
climate  peculiarly  fitted  to  produce  in  richest 
abundance  all  that  was  most  desirable  of  semi- 
tropical  products.  For  exportation  the  Jews  pos 
sessed  wheat  and  barley,  wine,  oil,  wool,  hides, 
and  other  raw  products  all  extremely  valuable  to 
the  Phoenicians. 

The  commercial  rapprochement  between  Phoe 
nicia  and  Israel,  from  a  purely  business  point  of 
view,  was  therefore  desirable  in  the  highest  degree. 
It  tended  to  keep  the  peace  between  two  neighbour 
ing  states  mutually  dependent  on  each  other  at  a 


122     THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

time  when  cupidity  provided  an  excellent  reason 
for  ruthless  war. 

In  order  to  understand  clearly  how  the  services 
of  the  enormous  army  of  labourers  were  utilised  in 
the  building  of  the  temple  it  will  be  necessary  to 
obtain  some  light  regarding  the  peculiar  character 
istics  of  Phoenician  architecture.  "  The  foundation 
of  Phoenician  architecture/'  says  Renan,1  "  is  the 
carved  rock,  not  the  column  as  with  the  Greeks. 
The  wall  replaces  the  carved  rock  without  entirely 
losing  its  character.  Nothing  conduces  to  the 
belief  that  the  Phoenicians  ever  made  use  of  the 
keyed  vault. 

'  The  principle  of  monolithism  which  ruled  the 
Phoenician  and  Syrian  art  even  after  it  had  adapted 
much  from  the  Greek  is  very  contrary  to  the  art  of 
the  Hellenes.  Grecian  architecture  starts  from  the 
principle  of  the  division  of  the  stone  into  small 
pieces  and  avows  this  principle  boldly.  Never  did 
the  Greeks  derive  from  Pentelicus  blocks  of  a  size 
at  all  comparable  to  those  of  Baalbek  and  Egypt. 
They  saw  no  advantage  in  them.  On  the  contrary, 
they  saw  that  with  masses  of  this  kind,  which  are 
to  be  used  entire,  the  architect  has  his  hands  tied ; 
the  material,  instead  of  being  subordinate  to  the 
design  of  the  edifice,  runs  counter  to  the  design." 

The  Syrian  and  Phoenician  architects,  and  even 
those  of  Egypt,  were  at  the  command  of  their 
material.  The  stone  did  not  submit  to  the  shape 
which  the  artist  would  have  impressed  upon  it  ; 
it  continued  to  be  with  them  mere  rock. 

From  the  accounts  which  have  come  down  to  us 
it  seems  safe  to  conclude  that  the  material  em 
ployed  in  the  construction  of  the  Phoenician  build- 

1  Mission  de  Phenice^  p.  822. 


PHOENICIAN    AND    JEW  123 

ings  themselves  was  wood,  and  that  mainly  the 
cedar  and  fir  from  Lebanon.  Stone  as  a  rule  was 
only  employed  in  the  substructions  of  the  edifices. 
These  substructions  were,  nevertheless,  like  those 
of  Palmyra  and  especially  Baalbek,  of  remarkable 
size,  some  of  the  stones  weighing  as  much  as  a 
hundred  tons.  It  is,  however,  to  the  peculiar 
feature  of  wooden  superstructures  in  Phoenician 
architecture  that  we  must  look  for  an  explanation  of 
the  dearth  of  remains  of  ancient  buildings  in  Phoe 
nicia,  for,  naturally,  these  wooden  buildings  would 
entirely  disappear  in  the  course  of  a  few  centuries. 

The  time  consumed  in  the  building  of  the  Great 
Temple,  we  learn  from  i  Kings  vi.  38,  was  seven 
years,  and  from  I  Kings  vii.  I  we  gather  that  thirteen 
years  were  occupied  in  the  erection  of  the  summer 
palace  in  Lebanon.  From  i  Kings  (iv.  20  and  x.  21), 
however,  we  gather  some  information  that  on  the 
face  of  it  seems  even  more  wonderful  than  the 
erection  of  the  temple  and  palace,  namely,  that 
while  this  enormous  drain  was  sapping  the  resources 
of  the  kingdom,  "  Judah  and  Israel  were  many  as 
the  sand  which  is  by  the  sea  in  multitude,  eating  and 
drinking  and  making  merry/'  "  And  all  the  vessels 
of  the  house  of  the  forest  of  Lebanon  were  of  pure 
gold ;  none  were  of  silver  :  it  was  nothing  accounted 
of  in  the  days  of  Solomon/'  In  the  2/th  verse  of 
the  tenth  chapter  we  read  that  during  this  period 
Solomon  "  made  silver  to  be  in  Jerusalem  as 
stones/'  whereupon  the  writer,  as  if  appreciating 
the  incongruity  of  the  facts  related,  offers  what  is 
intended  to  be  a  satisfactory  explanation,  which, 
curiously  enough,  makes  no  reference  to  the  enor 
mous  amount  of  treasure  left  by  David,  but  simply 
to  the  fact  that  the  workmen  were  paid  from  a 


124    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

wholly  different  source,  "  for  the  king  had  at  sea 
a  navy  of  Tharshish  with  the  navy  of  Hiram :  once 
in  three  years  came  the  navy  of  Tharshish,  bringing 
gold,  and  silver,  ivory,  and  apes,  and  peacocks  " 
(i  Kings  x.  22). 

We  have  already  shown  that  Phoenician  enter 
prise  had  from  a  very  remote  period  opened  a  way 
by  land  over  the  western  side  of  Asia,  thus  placing 
the  nation  in  communication  with  the  Babylonians 
and  Arabians.  The  great  point  to  which  their 
operations  in  the  East  were  directed,  apart  from  the 
Bahrein  Islands,  was  undoubtedly  Babylon.  The 
route  thither  was  through  a  desert  where  the  traders 
were  subject  to  raids  from  the  people  who  shortly 
before  had  been  brought  into  subjection  to  Israel. 
As  a  participation  in  the  Phoenician  trade  was 
apparently  the  intention  of  Solomon,  he  either 
built  or  rebuilt  Baalath  and  Tadmor  or  Palmyra, 
which  were  fortunately  situated  on  the  route,  and 
garrisoned  them  with  a  view  to  safeguarding  his 
operations  (i  Kings  ix.  18). 

Whatever  access  the  Phoenicians  possessed  by 
that  route  to  the  Red  Sea  and  the  Indian  Ocean 
prior  to  this  date  must  have  been  by  favour  of  the 
Egyptians,  whose  port  of  Hieropolis  they  are  known 
to  have  used.  Through  the  conquest  of  the 
Edomites,  the  Jews,  however,  had  come  into  pos 
session  of  the  two  ports  of  Eloth  and  Eziongeber 
on  the  Gulf  of  ^Elana,  and  knowing  how  valuable 
they  would  be  to  the  Phoenicians  they  turned  them 
over  to  them  under  Jewish  protection.  The  gift 
must  have  been  invaluable  since  it  gave  the  Phoe 
nicians  access  to  the  Red  Sea  without  the  necessity 
for  undesirable  Egyptian  espionage.  At  the  same 
time  it  placed  in  their  hands  facilities  for  the  con- 


PHCENICIAN    AND    JEW  125 

struction  of  such  vessels  as  were  necessary  for  the 
conduct  of  the  Yemen  and  Indian  Ocean  trade,  and 
that  of  the  Persian  Gulf. 

Our  story  up  to  this  point  is  simple.  The 
cordiality  of  the  relations  existing  between  Hiram 
and  Solomon  and  the  nature  of  the  obligations 
under  which  the  Phoenician  nation  rested  to  the 
house  of  David  for  the  tranquillising  of  Syria,  on 
which  so  largely  depended  the  successful  prosecu 
tion  of  its  trade  with  the  further  South  and  East  as 
well  as  for  the  settled  state  of  Palestine,  providing 
a  safe  route  to  Egypt,  led  Hiram  to  make  overtures 
to  Solomon  for  a  joint  participation  in  certain 
expeditions  in  pursuit  of  the  produce  of  the  new 
territory  discovered  shortly  before,  and  at  the  same 
time  for  securing  those  precious  wares  of  Ophir 
which  were  deemed  essential  to  the  completion  and 
adornment  of  the  temple  then  in  course  of  con 
struction  :  for  the  house  that  Solomon  built  was 
great,  for  great  was  his  God  above  all  gods  (2 
Chron.  ii.  5). 

To  the  prosecution  of  these  enterprises  the  two 
kings  contributed  both  ships  and  money.  The 
question  of  transportation  had  first  to  be  con 
sidered,  for  the  expeditions  were  not  voyages  of 
discovery  demanding  vessels  of  light  draft  with 
only  accommodation  for  the  crews  and  the  neces 
sary  provisions.  It  was  accordingly  decided  to 
begin  the  construction  of  a  new  double  fleet  of  seven 
ships  (Nat.  Races,  iii.  270)  of  the  largest  type. 
Those  were  to  be  modelled  after  the  pattern  of  the 
large  armed  ships  of  Tharshish  engaged  in  the  trade 
between  Tyre  and  the  Atlantic  ports  of  Spain, 
which  were  capable  of  weathering  any  storm  and 
carrying  large  and  valuable  cargoes.  As  neither 


126    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Phoenician  or  Jewish  jurisdiction  extended  to  the 
Persian  Gulf  it  was  decided  to  use  the  two  ports  of 
Eloth  and  Eziongeber  on  the  Red  Sea  as  dock 
yards  for  the  construction  of  the  two  fleets. 
Solomon,  taking  the  initiative,  "  made  a  navy  of 
Tharshish  at  Eziongeber,  which  is  beside  Eloth,  on 
the  shore  of  the  Red  Sea,  in  the  land  of  Edom. 
And  Hiram  sent  in  the  navy  his  servants,  shipmen 
that  had  knowledge  of  the  sea,  with  the  servants  of 
Solomon.  And  they  came  to  Ophir,  and  fetched  from 
thence  gold  four  hundred  and  twenty  talents,  and 
brought  it  to  King  Solomon  "  (i  Kings  ix.  28).  "  For 
the  king's  ships  went  to  Tharshish  with  the  servants 
of  Hiram  :  every  three  years  once  came  the  ships  of 
Tharshish  bringing  gold,  and  silver,  ivory,  and  apes, 
and  peacocks  "  (2  Chron.  ix.  21).  "  And  the  servants 
also  of  Hiram  and  the  servants  of  Solomon,  which 
brought  gold  from  Ophir,  brought  algum  trees  and 
precious  stones  "  (2  Chron.  ix.  10). 

These  accounts,  it  will  be  observed,  differ  some 
what  both  with  respect  to  the  name  of  the  destina 
tion  and  the  constituents  of  the  cargoes.  As  a 
result  some  writers  have  volunteered  the  opinion 
that  the  co-partnership  extended  to  the  Mediter 
ranean  trade,  but  of  this  no  evidence  can  be  obtained 
except  such  as  may  be  derived  from  the  name  of  the 
type  of  craft  employed  in  the  expeditions  or  that 
applied  to  the  region  for  which  the  ships  set  out. 

It  is  quite  apparent  that  the  expeditions  did  not 
proceed  to  Spain,  the  western  Tharshish,  from  a 
Mediterranean  port,  for  by  reference  to  2  Chronicles 
xx.  36  it  will  be  seen  that  the  fleet  of  Jehoshaphat 
which,  it  is  expressly  stated, 'sailed  for  this  same 
Tharshish,  sailed  likewise  from  the  port  of  Ezion 
geber  on  the  Red  Sea. 


PHOENICIAN    AND    JEW  127 

That  the  Ophir  which  supplied  in  such  abund 
ance  the  gold,  ivory,  apes,  and  peacocks  of  the  text 
(i  Kings  x.  22}  was  that  of  India  and  South  Arabia 
there  can  be  no  question.  When,  however,  we  ask 
where  was  that  Ophir  which  could  be  reached  from 
Eziongeber  that  provided  silver  in  such  abundance 
that  it  became  a  drug  in  the  Jewish  markets  and  as 
stones  in  the  streets  of  Jerusalem  (i  Kings  x.  27), 
we  are  at  once  confronted  by  a  problem  that  will 
require  very  careful  handling. 

'  Those  who  are  acquainted  with  Asia/'  says 
Heeren  in  his  Historical  Research,  "  must  be  sur 
prised  at  the  quantity  of  silver  which  existed  there 
as  early  as  the  times  of  the  Persian  monarchy. 
The  tribute  was  collected  in  silver  except  in  the 
case  of  the  Ethiopians  and  Indians,  for  silver, 
though  not  so  abundant  as  gold,  was  used  for  pur 
poses  of  decoration.  At  the  same  time  silver  mines 
were  of  much  rarer  occurrence  in  Asia  than  those 
of  gold,  and  the  mountain  districts  where  the  metal 
was  found  in  greatest  abundance  is  the  western  dis 
trict  of  the  Caucasus  or  the  country  of  the  Chalybees, 
which  is  celebrated  on  this  account  by  the  author  of 
the  Iliad,  ii.  856,  '  From  Abybi  remote  whence  comes 
the  silver  ore/  The  inhabitants  of  this  district  have 
at  all  times  engaged  in  mining,  and  many  ages  after, 
when  the  Genoese  were  masters  of  the  Black  Sea,  they 
also  opened  silver  mines  of  which  traces  still  exist. 

"  Silver  is  also  found  in  Siberia  and  in  China  or 
South  Asia,  but  the  large  annual  importations  of 
the  metal  from  Europe  in  consequence  of  the  high 
price  it  bore  in  the  East  sufficiently  prove  that  it 
was  found  there  in  small  quantities.  We  may 
therefore  conclude  with  certainty  that  the  greater 
portion  of  the  silver  possessed  of  old  by  the  Asiatic 


128    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

nations  was  imported,  and  there  can  be  no  question 
that  the  Phoenicians  were  the  channel  of  impor 
tation." 

Testimony  such  as  this  from  so  reliable  an 
authority  is  extremely  valuable.  The  Spanish 
peninsula,  being  in  this  case  clearly  out  of  the 
question  when  considered  in  connection  with  the 
staple  of  the  cargoes  of  these  expeditions  of  Solomon 
and  Hiram,  it  will  be  necessary  to  carry  our  inves 
tigation  further  afield  if  we  would  discover  that 
Ophir  which  produced  this  precious  metal  in  such 
abundance.  As,  however,  the  elucidation  of  so 
complex  a  problem  will  necessarily  occupy  much 
space  it  will  be  prudent  to  devote  a  chapter  ex 
clusively  to  it. 


CHAPTER   VI 

THE   WHEREABOUTS   OF   OPHIR 

The  Ophir  of  the  Hebrews  —  Route  pursued  by  Solomon  and  Hiram's 
fleet  —  Evidence  afforded  by  crew  and  cargo  —  Testimony  of  the 
Scythians  and  Thracians  —  Evidences  of  Phoenician  civilisation  on 
American  mainland  —  Early  civilisation  of  Central  America  not  indi 
genous  —  Votanic  tradition  and  its  significance  —  Nomenclature  of 
Pacific  Islands  as  a  clue  —  Polynesians  of  Eastern  Mediterranean 
origin. 

THOUGH  much  has  been  written  about  the  region 
called  Ophir,  which  was  the  ultimate  destination 
of  the  expeditions  of  Hiram  and  Solomon,  the 
amount  of  positive  information  is  extremely  small. 
In  this  chapter  an  endeavour  will  be  made  to  treat 
the  subject  somewhat  fully  from  an  entirely  new 
point  of  view  that  offers,  we  believe,  a  complete 
solution  of  the  enigma. 

The  first  historic  reference  to  the  name  Ophir 
is  found  in  Genesis  x.  29,  which  reads  as  follows  : 
"  And  Ophir  and  Havilah  and  Jobab  ;  all  these  were 
sons  of  Joktan.  And  their  dwelling  was  from 
Mesha  as  thou  goest  unto  Sephar  a  mount  of  the 
east."  This  information  is  supplemented  by 
Josephus  vi.  4,  who  says  :  rc  Now  Joktan  one  of 
the  sons  of  Heber  had  these  sons,  Ehnodad,  Jaliph, 
Asermoth,  Jera,  Adoram,  Aziel,  Desla,  Abermail, 
Sabeus,  Ophir,  Emilat,  and  Jobab,  these  inhabited 
from  Cophenand  Indian  River  and  parts  adjoining  it." 

With  this  specific  information  respecting  the 
location  of  the  territory  inhabited  by  the  descend 
ants  of  Joktan,  there  is  no  difficulty  in  ascertaining 


129 


130    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

the  position  occupied  by  the  region  with  which  the 
name  Ophir  in  the  Scripture  narrative  was  originally 
identified,  for  by  reference  to  any  atlas  of  ancient 
geography  it  will  be  seen  that  the  Cophen  has  its 
rise  in  Bactriana  and  joins  the  river  Indus  just 
south  of  Pencelaotis  in  India.  The  original  settle 
ment  going  by  that  name  must  clearly,  therefore, 
have  embraced  the  territory  lying  between  Bac 
triana  and  the  Indian  Ocean. 

From  the  Jewish  point  of  view,  with  which  we 
are  at  present  more  particularly  concerned,  the 
name  Ophir  may  safely  be  viewed  not  as  a  par 
ticular  place  but  as  the  general  name  for  the  rich 
southern  countries  lying  on  the  African,  Arabian, 
and  Indian  coasts  which  found  their  common 
centre  of  commercial  exchange  in  the  provinces  of 
Hydramaut  and  Yemen  in  Southern  Arabia.  This 
view  is  by  no  means  an  arbitrary  one.  It  will  be 
found  to  have  no  small  support  in  a  consideration  of 
what  was  said  in  earlier  chapters  on  the  channels 
of  commerce  in  connection  with  the  caravan  trade 
of  the  Arabian  Peninsula. 

The  distance  from  Yemen  to  Petra,  the  northern 
emporium  for  Arabian  staples  from  which  the 
caravans  debouched  to  Jerusalem  and  Tyre,  was 
1260  geographical  miles,  and  as  the  daily  rate 
of  travelling  for  a  caravan  was  18  miles  the 
entire  journey  occupied  seventy  days.  If  allow 
ance  is  made  for  the  journey  from  Petra  to  Tyre  or 
Jerusalem  with  the  necessary  stoppages  the  return 
journey  from  Tyre  or  Jerusalem  to  Yemen  could 
comfortably  be  made  by  caravan  in  from  eight  to 
nine  months  (Hist.  Res.,  i.  356). 

The  other  route  from  South  Arabia  ran  from 
Hydramaut,  the  adjoining  province  to  Yemen,  by 


THE    WHEREABOUTS    OF    OPHIR     131 

a  direct  course  through  the  desert  to  Gerrha  on  the 
north-west  coast  of  the  Persian  Gulf.  This  was 
only  a  distance  of  700  miles,  and  could  be  covered 
at  the  same  rate  of  travel  in  forty  days,  but  as 
Gerrha  was  much  farther  distant  from  Tyre  or 
Jerusalem  than  Petra,  the  total  length  of  the  journey 
from  either  of  the  South  Arabian  provinces  was  to 
some  extent  equalised,  and  the  journey  by  either 
route  in  consequence  easily  accomplished  in  the 
time  mentioned. 

It  should,  therefore,  be  clear  that  it  was  not  with 
a  view  to  a  better  control  of  the  Yemen-Ophir  trade 
that  these  astute  monarchs,  Solomon  and  Hiram, 
created  the  costly  fleet  of  large  armed  ships  of 
Tharshish,  for,  according  to  the  Scripture  narra 
tive  (2  Chron.  ix.  21),  the  fastest  time  in  which  the 
vessels  could  make  the  return  journey  was  three 
years. 

Ophir,  then,  as  far  as  it  relates  to  India,  Arabia, 
or  Ethiopia  is  clearly  out  of  the  question.  This 
view  receives  the  strongest  confirmative  support 
in  the  significant  fact  that,  according  to  the  Scrip 
ture  narrative  (2  Chron.  ix.  20,  21),  silver  was  a  part 
of  the  return  cargoes  which,  as  has  been  shown, 
could  not  have  been  obtained  in  Southern  Asia  in 
such  quantities  as  to  account  for  the  extraordinary 
reversal  of  the  values  of  the  precious  metal  as 
obtained  in  Arabia. 

According  to  Agatharchides  (cf.  Bochart,  p.  139) 
silver  was  so  scarce  in  the  Arabian  Peninsula  that 
it  was  assessed  at  ten  times  the  value  of  gold,  which 
was  there  in  such  abundance  that  the  Midianites, 
one  of  the  carrying  tribes  that  had  grown  exceed 
ingly  wealthy,  were  accustomed  to  make  of  gold 
their  own  articles  of  personal  adornment,  even  their 


132    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

collars,  and   the   chains   of  their   camels  were  also 
made  of  gold  (Judges  viii.  26). 

Silver  again  during  the  Solomonic  period  became 
as  common  as  stones  in  Jerusalem.  Clearly,  then, 
Ophir  of  the  Scripture  narrative  must  be  looked  for 
in  the  farther  East,  and  in  a  territory  that  was  not 
only  capable  of  supplying  silver  in  practically  un 
limited  quantities,  but  of  affording  conclusive  evi 
dence  of  occupancy  by  the  Jews  and  Phoenicians. 

While  we  do  not  possess  the  same  specific  in 
formation  with  respect  to  the  naval  operations  of 
the  Phoenicians  on  the  eastern  that  we  do  on  the 
western  side,  it  by  no  means  follows  that  movements 
equal  in  importance  were  not  in  operation  on  the 
Red  Sea  and  Persian  Gulf. 

The  control  of  the  South  Arabian  markets  could 
not  have  been  the  sole  object  of  the  expeditions  of 
Hiram  and  Solomon,  for  if  three  years  were  neces 
sarily  consumed  in  these  short  coasting  voyages  of 
not  more  than  2500  miles  from  Eziongeber  to 
Yemen  and  back,  as  this  view  suggests  (2  Chron. 
ix.  21),  the  cost  of  the  ships,  the  expense  of  working 
them,  interest  on  capital  invested  over  so  long  a 
period,  and  the  necessary  deterioration  of  the 
cargoes  in  such  a  climate  would  have  much  more 
than  counterbalanced  any  advantage  gained  by 
sea  transport.  Moreover,  the  silver,  on  which  the 
Scripture  narrative  lays  great  emphasis,  could  not 
have  been  obtained  there. 

On  the  other  hand,  it  seems  scarcely  possible 
that  expeditions  to  so  near  a  region  as  Yemen  could 
have  awakened  such  enthusiasm  in  their  prosecu 
tion  as  to  have  taken  Solomon  and  his  court  (in  all 
probability  accompanied  by  Hiram)  from  the 
security  of  their  capital  into  the  heart  of  a  dis- 


THE   WHEREABOUTS    OF    OPHIR     133 

affected  country  to  witness  the  departure  of  the 
ships  and  their  crews  (2  Chron.  viii.  17). 

Although  no  information  seems  to  have  reached 
the  outside  world  relative  to  the  proposed  destina 
tion  of  the  fleets,  there  can  be  no  doubt  that  Solo 
mon  and  Hiram  and  those  in  command  of  the  ex 
peditions  were  in  possession  of  information  of  a 
very  definite  character,  both  with  respect  to  the 
destination  and  the  route  thither  (i  Kings  ix.  27). 
But  this  was  clearly  no  part  of  their  policy  to 
divulge.  If,  therefore,  we  desire  a  more  intimate 
knowledge  respecting  the  destination  of  these  fleets 
we  must  look  for  it  to  some  other  and  less  direct 
source. 

Some  light  can  without  doubt  be  obtained  by  a 
consideration  of  the  constituents  of  the  cargoes 
carried  by  the  ships  on  the  return  voyages,  likewise 
by  a  consideration  of  the  class  and  nationality  of 
the  men  who  manned  the  great  ships  of  Tharshish 
employed  on  these  longer  voyages,  for,  as  we  have 
already  shown,  Phoenicia  could  never  have  supplied 
a  tithe  of  the  population  necessary  to  the  equip 
ment  of  their  mercantile,  manufacturing,  and 
colonial  enterprises.  The  presence,  therefore,  of 
this  composite  nationality  may  enable  us  to  trace 
the  route  pursued  and  the  destination  arrived  at 
with  even  more  defmiteness  than  is  possible  by  any 
other  method. 

That  portion  of  the  Scythian  nation  which 
certainly  hired  itself  out  as  a  mercenary  force  and 
entered  the  service  of  the  Phoenicians  belonged  to 
the  royal  tribe  who  thought  it  derogatory  to  be 
employed  either  in  mercantile  or  agricultural  pur 
suits.  According  to  Herodotus  (iv.  5)  the  nation 
claimed  to  be  autochthonous  and  to  be  descended 


134    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

from  Targitaus,  who  lived  1500  B.C.  on  the  banks 
of  the  Dneiper.  This  account  of  their  origin  can 
scarcely  be  received  at  its  face  value. 

Nevertheless  it  is  difficult  to  place  the  Scythians 
in  the  category  of  nations,  for  the  description  of 
them  given  by  Hippocrates  has  led  many  writers 
to  suppose  that  they  were  of  Mongolian  extraction. 
But  this  supposition  cannot  be  reconciled  with  the 
fact  that  all  the  Scythian  deities  had  an  apparent 
Aryan  origin,  their  language  likewise  supporting 
the  view  that  they  were  Aryans.  Their  highest 
deity  was  Tabiti,  the  goddess  of  the  hearth.  Next 
in  importance  came  Papeus,  the  god  of  heaven,  with 
his  wife,  Apia,  the  earth,  and  after  these  Apollo, 
Venus,  Urania,  Hercules,  and  Mars  (Her.  iv.  59). 
It  is  advisable  that  the  names  of  these  deities  be 
remembered,  because  they  play  a  very  important 
part  in  enabling  us  to  trace  the  course  pursued  by 
the  ships  composing  the  expeditions  to  the  farther 
East. 

The  whole  Scythian  nation  was  peculiarly  tena 
cious  of  its  customs,  and  studiously  avoided  employ 
ing  foreign  peoples.  They  not  only  killed  two  of 
their  kings  for  the  adoption  of  foreign  customs  but, 
on  this  account,  erased  their  names  from  the  tablets 
of  the  nation.  Some  of  the  Scythian  customs  were 
of  the  most  extraordinary  character,  and  provide 
an  infallible  means  of  tracing  the  course  of  these 
expeditions  not  only  in  the  Pacific  but  on  the 
American  Continent. 

The  Scythians  always  fought  on  horseback. 
In  the  use  of  the  bow  and  arrow  they  were  the  most 
expert  nation  of  antiquity.  The  foeman  drank  the 
blood  of  the  first  enemy  he  slew  in  battle,  believing 
that  the  prowess  of  his  adversary  was  in  this  way 


THE    WHEREABOUTS    OF    OPHIR     135 

transferred  to  himself.  It  was  obligatory,  too,  that 
the  warrior  should  present  the  heads  of  the  slain  to 
the  king,  otherwise  he  would  not  be  permitted  to 
share  in  the  booty.  The  heads  thus  secured  were 
scalped  by  making  a  circular  incision  round  the 
ears  and  shaking  the  skin  loose  from  the  skull ; 
and  he  was  accounted  the  most  valiant  warrior  who 
had  the  greatest  number  of  these  scalps  hanging 
from  his  saddle. 

Among  the  Issedones,  another  branch  of  the 
nation,  when  a  man's  father  died  the  relations 
brought  cattle,  and,  having  slaughtered  them,  they 
cut  up  the  flesh  of  the  dead  parent  and,  having 
mingled  all  together,  they  prepared  a  banquet  at 
which  the  skull,  which  meantime  had  been  cleansed 
and  gilded,  presided,  under  the  supposition  that  it 
was  the  habitation  of  the  spirit  of  the  deceased 
parent.  Henceforth  it  was  preserved  as  a  sacred 
memorial,  annual  sacrifices  being  performed  to  it 
(Her.  iv.  26). 

The  Scythians  did  not  bathe  the  body  in  water, 
but  when  they  desired  to  become  clean  had  recourse 
to  a  unique  substitute,  which  was  the  undoubted 
origin  of  the  Turkish  bath.  Throughout  the  region 
occupied  by  them  there  grew  a  species  of  hemp  of 
the  nettle  tribe  similar  to  that  from  which  the 
eastern  hasheesh  is  extracted,  and  this  they  em 
ployed  in  the  production  of  their  vapour  bath. 
Having  thoroughly  washed  and  dried  the  head, 
they  set  up  three  pieces  of  wood  leaning  against 
each  other  in  the  form  of  a  triangle,  round  which 
were  wrapped  woollen  cloths  closely  joined  together. 
They  then  placed  in  the  centre  of  the  space  so  en 
closed  a  vessel  into  which  red-hot  stones  were  thrown, 
then,  taking  in  their  hands  some  seed  of  the  hemp 


136    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

plant,  they  crept  under  the  woollen  cloths,  and, 
scattering  the  seed  upon  the  hot  stones,  at  once 
produced  a  steam  bath  and  a  hasheesh  intoxication 
whose  intensity  was  regulated  by  the  number  of 
stones  and  the  quantity  of  seed  used. 

Another  populous  section  of  the  nation,  the 
Budini,  painted  the  body  a  deep  blue  and  red, 
especially  in  war,  and  the  Neuri,  who  seem  clearly 
enough  from  their  practice  of  totemism  to  have 
been  of  Aryan  extraction,  had  the  reputation 
among  the  Greeks  of  being  magicians,  because  once 
a  year  they  assumed  the  form  of  the  wolf,  their 
tribal  token,  after  which  they  returned  to  their 
normal  state  (Her.  iv.  105).  The  Androphaghi, 
who  were  Nomads  and  spoke  a  language  peculiar 
to  themselves,  were,  like  the  Lystrigians  of  Sicily, 
actual  cannibals,  and  feasted  on  any  hapless  wretch 
whom  they  could  get  into  their  power  (Her.  iv.  106). 

In  spite,  however,  of  these  racial  peculiarities, 
the  Scythians  as  a  people  were  held  in  the  highest 
esteem  among  the  ancients.  They  practised  a  species 
of  literal  communism,  holding  all  things  in  common, 
even  their  wives  and  children,  these  being  made  a 
common  charge  on  the  community  who  cared  for 
their  welfare.  By  Homer  and  Strabo  they  were 
described  as  the  justest  of  mankind,  being  more 
sincere,  frugal,  and  self-denying  in  their  habits  than 
any  other  of  the  ancient  peoples.  They  had  like 
wise  invincible  courage. 

After  the  death  of  Scylas,  who  seems  to  have 
been  slain  shortly  before  the  visit  of  Herodotus  to 
Obja  (Her.  iv.  78),  a  great  deterioration  seems  to 
have  taken  place  among  the  Scythians  in  conse 
quence  of  their  association  with  the  outside  world, 
Phoenicia,  on  account  of  the  wide  range  of  its 


THE   WHEREABOUTS    OF    OPHIR     137 

operations,  apparently  being  the  predominating 
cause,  for  large  numbers  of  Scythians  appear  to 
have  been  employed  on  the  Phoenician  fleets  either 
in  the  capacity  of  marines  or  seamen. 

There  has  been  considerable  discussion  as  to 
whether  the  Scythians  were  a  small  or  a  numerous 
people,  but  the  testimony  both  of  Herodotus  (i.  104) 
and  Strabo  (B.  I.,  ii.  28)  is  quite  explicit.  During 
many  centuries  they  seem  indeed  to  have  been  one 
of  the  most  powerful  nations  in  Southern  Europe. 
They  invaded  Media,  where  they  gained  a  great 
victory,  after  which  they  overran  Asia,  which  they 
held  in  complete  subjection  for  twenty-eight  years, 
from  636  to  606  B.C. 

According  to  the  Scythian  tradition  (Her.  iv.  10) 
their  kings  were  descended  from  Scythes,  the  son 
of  Hercules  and  Queen  Hylea.  As  the  story  of  this 
association  provides  another  valuable  link  in  the 
chain  of  evidence  connecting  the  Eastern  Medi 
terranean  with  the  Pacific  we  will  briefly  refer  to  it. 

According  to  this  story  Hercules,  after  the  re 
storation  to  him  of  his  lost  mares  by  Queen  Hylaea, 
desired  to  return  to  Erythraia,  his  native  land,  and 
Hylaea,  at  last  consenting,  asked  whether,  when 
their  three  sons  were  grown  up,  she  should  establish 
them  in  the  land  over  which  she  ruled  or  send  them 
to  him.  Hercules  is  said  to  have  replied  :  "  When 
you  see  the  children  arrived  at  the  age  of  men  you 
can  make  no  mistake  if  you  follow  this  course. 
Whoever  is  able  to  gird  himself  with  this  girdle  and 
bend  the  bow  of  Hercules  retain  him  as  an  inhabi 
tant  of  this  country,  but  whoever  is  unable  to  fulfil 
these  tasks  dismiss  him."  Then,  having  drawn  out 
the  bow  as  a  test  of  strength,  he  gave  it  to  her, 
likewise  the  belt.  When  the  young  men  had 


138    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

arrived  at  maturity  Hylaea  enforced  what  Hercules 
had  enjoined.  Two  of  her  sons,  Agathrysis  and 
Gelonis,  being  unable  to  accomplish  the  feat,  were 
driven  out  of  the  country,  but  Scythes,  having  proved 
himself  equal  to  the  task,  remained  and  succeeded 
his  mother.  The  succeeding  kings  of  the  Scythians 
were  thus  descended  from  Scythes  the  son  of 
Hercules  and  Hylaea  (Her.  iv.  10). 

The  Thracians,  who  occupied  the  territory  ad 
joining  the  Scythians,  were  not  only  of  the  same 
Indo-European  stock  but  likewise  accustomed  to 
hire  themselves  out  as  mercenaries.  They,  too, 
seem  to  have  drifted  into  the  employment  of  the 
Phoenicians  as  seamen  and  marines.  Famous  as 
swordsmen  and  javelin  throwers,  the  Thracians  were 
one  of  the  greatest  nations  in  Southern  Europe. 
According  to  Herodotus  (v.  3),  if  they  had  been 
governed  by  one  man  and  had  at  any  time  acted 
in  concert  they  would  have  been  invincible.  Like 
the  Scythians  they  had  some  peculiar  customs, 
which  are  noteworthy  because  of  their  having  been 
found  in  regions  very  remote  from  Thracia. 

Among  the  Thracians  tattooing  was  regarded  as 
a  mark  of  noble  birth.  Again,  in  the  equipment  of 
the  mercenary  forces  the  use  of  the  sling  was  a 
prominent  feature.  No  fewer  than  two  thousand 
slingmen  were  employed  by  Xerxes  in  his  campaigns. 
Flint  arrow  heads  were  another  distinguishing  feature, 
these  being  used  not  only  in  the  chase  but  in  war. 

Before  proceeding  further  there  is  still  one  point 
to  be  noted  which  will  be  found  of  great  value  in 
arriving  at  a  final  elucidation  of  our  problem ;  we 
refer  to  the  almost  universal  practice  of  naming 
new  abodes  after  former  homes  or  religious  beliefs 
and  experiences.  We  lay  great  stress  on  the  evi- 


THE   WHEREABOUTS    OF    OPHIR     139 

dence  of  this  custom,  for  it  practically  affords  an 
outline  of  the  route  pursued  by  the  ships  of  Hiram 
and  Solomon. 

The  enterprise  of  the  Phoenicians  during  the 
period  1050  B.C.  was  so  extraordinary  that  it  seems 
scarcely  possible  to  overrate  it.  Tyre  was  then  in 
the  ascendant  and  Phoenicia  at  the  summit  of  its 
glory,  the  business  establishments  of  the  nation 
stretching  not  only  from  the  shores  of  Norway  and 
Britain  to  Tyre  but  likewise  from  the  Red  Sea  to 
India  and  the  Golden  Chersonese. 

What  need  was  there,  then,  for  the  creation  of  a 
new  and  double  fleet  of  vessels  of  the  largest  tonnage 
and  the  Tharshish  model  to  pursue  a  course  or  engage 
in  a  trade  already  prosecuted  in  a  satisfactory 
manner  by  caravan  or  ship  ?  Why  employ  the  wise 
men  of  Tyre  in  the  navigation  of  a  course  with  which 
they  were  already  intimately  familiar  ? 

If  we  take  up  a  map  of  the  world  we  will  probably 
receive  some  valuable  light  as  to  the  course  pur 
sued  and  the  destination  of  the  fleets  of  Hiram  and 
Solomon.  By  drawing  a  line  from  the  ^Elantic 
Gulf  of  the  Red  Sea  to  the  Straits  of  Babelmandeb, 
and  from  that  point  passing  it  round  the  coast  of 
Arabia  into  the  Persian  Gulf,  thence  continuing  it 
along  the  west  side  to  the  Bahrein  Islands  to  the 
mouth  of  the  Euphrates,  and  thence  down  the  east 
side  of  India  to  Ceylon  and  the  Golden  Chersonese, 
we  have  before  us  the  well- authenticated  track  of 
Phoenician  sea  commerce.  But  if  we  continue  the 
line  to  Java  and  Sumatra  we  will  have  reached  the 
native  home  of  the  peacock.  Proceeding  still 
farther  by  Torres  Straits  we  pass  into  the  Pacific, 
to  the  Caroline  Islands,  Tonga,  Samoa,  Rappa,  and 
Tahiti,  thence  to  Easter  Island,  connecting  Tahiti 


140    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

with  the  coasts  of  America  at  Mexico  and  Peru. 
By  so  doing  we  will  have  located  a  series  of  islands 
and  points  on  the  American  mainland  which  contain 
not  only  substructions  of  the  Phoenician  type  but 
traditions  for  the  presence  of  which  no  satisfactory 
explanation  has  so  far  been  offered.  Moreover, 
these  give  evidence  of  occupancy  by  a  civilised 
people  of  that  curiously  composite  type  which  was 
the  very  remarkable  feature  of  the  personnel  of  the 
expeditions  of  Hiram  and  Solomon. 

If  we  select  the  more  northern  route,  connecting 
Samoa  and  Tahiti  with  the  American  Continent, 
and  enter  Mexico  from  the  Pacific  side,  we  are  im 
mediately  confronted  by  evidence  of  an  even  more 
startling  nature.  Here  are  to  be  seen  buildings,  of 
a  character  so  ancient  that  the  date  of  their  erection 
cannot  be  even  approximately  arrived  at,  yet  in 
which  the  predominant  features  are  wholly  Phoe 
nician.  Here  may  be  seen  the  wall  referred  to  by 
Renan,  likewise  the  composite  decoration  contain 
ing  unmistakable  traces  of  Greek,  Egyptian,  and 
Assyrian  types,  and  overlaid  by  that  serpent  sym 
bolism  which  was  peculiar  to  Phoenicia.  Of  all 
these  we  have  an  impressive  reminder  in  the  first 
foundations  at  Nachan,  whose  designation  was 
clearly  enough  derived  from  Nashon,  the  family 
name  of  Solomon,  the  principal  partner  in  these 
joint  expeditions. 

After  even  a  cursory  examination  of  the  evidence 
afforded  by  these  substructions  the  question  may 
well  be  asked,  What  navigating  power  of  antiquity 
but  Phoenicia  was  capable  of  making  such  a  voyage 
as  the  discovery  of  America  involved,  or  possessed 
such  a  commercial  and  manufacturing  association 
with  Greece,  Egypt,  and  Assyria  as  would  induce 


THE    WHEREABOUTS    OF    OPHIR     141 

it  in  other  lands  and  among  new  surroundings  to 
reproduce  these  artistic  types  ? 

It  has  been  already  shown  that  for  long  centuries 
the  Phoenicians  were  the  only  people  who  had  a 
continuous  and  uninterrupted  traffic  with  the  large 
centres  of  civilisation  in  the  East,  in  consequence  of 
which  they  carried  to  the  shores  and  islands  of  the 
Mediterranean,  that  there  were  subject  to  their 
commercial  enterprise,  types  that  were  not  peculiarly 
Phoenician,  but  the  riper  fruits  of  the  older  civilisa 
tions.  We  would  scarcely  expect  to  find  much 
similarity  between  Greek  and  Egyptian  art  for  the 
reason  that  the  intercourse  between  the  two  coun 
tries,  especially  during  the  Greek  formative  period, 
was  too  casual.  But  from  our  knowledge  of  the 
very  intimate  character  of  the  association  that 
existed  between  both  of  these  nations  and  Baby 
lonia  and  Phoenicia  we  are  warranted  in  expecting 
very  clear  evidence  of  the  influence  of  all  three  on 
Phoenician  remains,  especially  when  we  remember 
that  the  manufacturers  of  Phoenicia  were  mainly 
employed  through  long  centuries  in  catering  for 
these  markets. 

Now  it  is  very  significant  of  the  source  of  the 
inspiration  which  was  at  work  in  the  production  of 
the  types  found  in  early  American  art  and  archi 
tecture,  that  we  find  present  in  these  remains  traces 
of  that  composite  design  that  we  would  naturally 
expect  to  find  in  Phoenician  remains  where  the  re 
strictions  of  a  local  market  and  a  peculiar  need 
were  withdrawn  and  the  artist  and  artisan  had  a 
free  hand  to  follow  their  own  peculiar  bias.  Nor 
will  we  ever  be  able  to  account  for  the  conglomerate 
types  found  in  the  civilisation  of  the  New  World 
unless  we  can  account  for  the  presence  of  Phoenicia 


142    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

there,  because  there  was  no  other  nation  around 
whose  national  life  there  revolved  those  conditions 
out  of  which  such  types  as  are  found  there  could 
have  been  evolved.  To  suppose  that  such  a  com 
bination  of  old  world  units  as  are  found  on  the 
Central  American  ruins  are  simply  the  result  of  the 
evolution  of  an  autochthonic  people  who  never  were 
in  touch  with  the  old  world  centres  of  civilisation 
is,  on  the  face  of  it,  absurd. 

It  is  possible  that  the  Old  World  may  originally 
have  been  peopled  from  the  New  ;  but  the  facts  in 
our  possession  point  in  a  wholly  different  direction. 
It  is  to  the  Asiatic  continent  that  we  must  look  for 
such  evidence  as  exists  for  the  origin  of  the  civilisa 
tion  that  from  a  very  remote  period  inhabited  the 
central  portions  of  America.  Humboldt  has  pointed 
out  (Exam.  Crit.  ii.  68)  that  the  monuments,  methods 
of  computing  time,  systems  of  cosmogony,  and  many 
other  myths  of  America  offer  striking  analogies  with 
the  ideas  of  Eastern  Asia,  analogies  which  indicate 
an  ancient  communication  and  are  not  simply  the 
result  of  that  uniform  condition  in  which  all  nations 
are  found  in  the  dawn  of  civilisation.  Prescott's 
(Mexico,  iii.  418)  conclusions  are  equally  to  the 
point.  "  The  coincidences/'  he  says,  "  are  suffi 
ciently  strong  to  authorise  a  belief  that  the  civilisa 
tion  of  Anahuac  (the  territory  in  which  Nachan  is 
situated)  was  in  some  degree  influenced  by  that  of 
Eastern  Asia,  and,  secondly, that  the  discrepancies  are 
of  such  a  nature  as  to  carry  back  this  communica 
tion  to  a  very  early  period,  a  period  so  remote  that 
the  foreign  influence  has  been  too  feeble  to  inter 
fere  materially  with  what  may  be  regarded  in  its 
essential  features  as  an  indigenous  civilisation." 

"  Even   after    making    every    allowance/'    says 


THE   WHEREABOUTS    OF    OPHIR     143 

Gallatin  (Amer.  Eth.  Soc.  Trans.,  i.  179),  "  I  cannot 
see  any  possible  reason  that  should  have  prevented 
those  who,  after  the  dispersion  of  mankind,  moved 
towards  the  east  and  north-east,  from  having 
reached  the  extremities  of  Asia  and  passed  over  to 
America  within  five  hundred  years  after  the  Flood. 
However  small  may  have  been  the  number  of  these 
first  emigrants,  an  equal  number  of  years  would 
have  been  more  than  sufficient  to  occupy  in  their 
own  way  every  part  of  America/'  "  Indeed/' 
remarks  Naidullse,  "  between  the  men  of  the  New 
World  and  those  of  the  Old  there  exists  no  essential 
physical  difference,  the  unity  of  the  human  race 
standing  out  as  the  one  great  law  dominating  the 
history  of  humanity." 

In  view  of  these  facts  it  is  somewhat  startling  to 
find  that  the  written  records  of  the  early  civilised 
nations  of  the  American  nation  explicitly  and 
emphatically  declare  that  their  civilisation  was  not 
indigenous  but  imported  and  of  foreign  origin.  The 
Abbe  Brasseur  de  Bourbourg,  an  authority  second 
to  no  other  on  the  early  history  of  the  American 
civilised  states,  says  that  he  found  in  the  native 
documents  referring  to  the  Votanic  period,  translated 
by  him,  that  two  strangers  named  Igh  and  Imox, 
who  hold  the  first  place  in  the  Izendal  calendar, 
came  to  the  continent  by  ship  from  some  foreign 
land,  and  that  Igh  founded  the  first  colony. 

These  expeditions  of  Igh  and  Imox,  preceding 
those  of  Votan,  explain  satisfactorily  the  source 
through  which  the  startling  intelligence  of  the  new 
discoveries  in  the  farther  East  reached  the  Persian 
Gulf  colonies.  They  also  explain  the  transmission 
of  the  news  to  Tyre  with  a  view  to  securing  vessels 
of  larger  tonnage  for  the  prosecution  of  the  enter- 


I44    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

prises  which  resulted  in  the  commercial  partnership 
between  Solomon  and  Hiram,  and  the  building  of 
the  two  fleets  at  Eziongeber  with  a  view  to  the 
exploitation  of  the  territory. 

That  this  is  no  merely  gratuitous  assumption 
will  be  made  evident  from  a  consideration  of  addi 
tional  facts  which  we  will  present  later,  for  whatever 
value  we  may  attach  to  the  details  of  these  tradi 
tions  transmitted  to  us  by  the  native  records,  there 
can  be  no  doubt  that  they  established  two  general 
propositions,  namely,  that  there  existed  in  the  re 
mote  past  in  the  Usumacinta  region  of  Central 
America  a  great  and  powerful  empire  of  which 
Nachan — the  city  of  serpents — was  the  capital, 
and,  second,  that  there  was  a  general  belief  among 
the  residents  of  that  kingdom  that  its  beginnings 
and  greatness  were  due  to  a  hero  or  demi-god  called 
Votan,  who,  following  in  the  footsteps  of  Igh  and. 
Imox,  claimed  to  have  come  from  Vitim  or  Chittim, 
and  that  he  arrived  on  the  Pacific  coasts  accompanied 
by  seven  ships  about  1000  B.C.,  or  just  at  the  time 
when  the  joint  expeditions  of  Hiram  and  Solomon 
proceeded  from  the  head  of  the  Red  Sea  to  Ophir, 
a  destination  that  so  far  has  not  been  satisfactorily 
determined,  although  sufficiently  distant  to  necessi 
tate  a  voyage  of  three  years. 

It  will  be  prudent,  therefore,  to  keep  these  im 
portant  facts  prominently  before  us  and  at  the  same 
time  to  remember  that  while  the  expeditions  were 
under  Jewish  and  Phoenician  direction,  they  carried 
crews  and  marine  force  of  composite  nationality, 
for  the  strongest  evidence  of  the  presence  of  these 
expeditions  over  any  portion  of  the  route  laid  down, 
either  in  the  Pacific  Islands  or  on  the  American 
Continent,  will  be  found  not  in  the  traces  of  one 


THE    WHEREABOUTS    OF    OPHIR     145 

surviving  type  so  much  as  in  the  presence  of  a 
composite  civilisation  revealing  the  racial  char 
acteristics  produced  by  an  amalgamation  of  these 
various  peoples. 

It  would  be  contrary  to  the  manifest  teaching  of 
history  to  suppose  that  four  such  nations  as  those 
of  the  Jews,  Phoenicians,  Scythians,  and  Thracians, 
who  at  that  period  dominated  Western  Asia  and 
Eastern  Europe,  nations  who  possessed  such  pro 
nouncedly  racial  characteristics,  could  even  for  a 
short  space  of  time  conjointly  occupy  any  virgin 
territory  without  leaving  behind  them  ineffaceable 
traces  of  their  presence.  Much,  therefore,  may 
reasonably  be  expected  from  a  careful  examination 
of  the  evidences  still  remaining  of  their  presence  in 
these  regions. 

That  some  very  remarkable  developments  had 
taken  place  in  the  farther  East  during  this  period 
whose  value  to  Phoenicia  was  great  in  consequence 
of  the  loss  of  the  territory  on  the  Eastern  Medi 
terranean,  through  Greek  aggression,  is  evident,  for 
the  Phoenicians  had  just  then  made  overtures  to 
the  monarch  of  the  adjoining  kingdom  of  Israel  for 
joint  commercial  expeditions  into  that  region.  The 
inducements  must  indeed  have  been  of  an  extra 
ordinary  character  since  it  led  the  Jews  to  partici 
pate  in  enterprises  contrary  to  all  their  antecedents. 

At  the  same  time  it  must  be  recollected  that  in 
thus  projecting  these  expeditions  the  Phoenicians 
in  very  large  measure  only  took  more  definite 
possession  of  a  previously  well-established  trade 
that  for  centuries  had  been  successfully  handled 
by  other  means.  So  far  as  the  Arabian  and  Persian 
Gulf,  the  Indian  Ocean,  and  the  Golden  Chersonese 
were  concerned,  it  was  not  a  voyage  of  discovery. 

K 


146    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

That  the  expeditions  pushed  into  regions  much  more 
distant  than  these  is,  however,  apparent  from  the 
three  years  consumed  in  the  double  voyage.  Yet 
it  is  evident  that  their  course  must  have  been  in  the 
general  direction  of  the  Farther  East,  for  the  pea 
cocks  could  only  have  come  from  Java  or  Sumatra. 
Pushing  at  once,  therefore,  beyond  Torres  Straits 
into  the  Pacific  and  proceeding  to  Samoa,  we  will 
receive  some  information  of  a  rather  startling  char 
acter  with  respect  to  the  course  of  these  expeditions. 

The  native  name  of  these  islands  is  not  Samoa, 
but  Samo,  no  other  pronunciation  of  the  word 
ever  being  used  by  the  natives  of  the  group  from 
the  time  of  their  discovery  by  Bougainville.  Now 
this  was  the  native  name  of  Samos  of  the  Sporades 
on  the  coasts  of  Asia  Minor  (Pliny,  v.  37),  which  was 
one  of  the  Phoenician  colonies.  The  name  Samo, 
according  to  the  same  authority,  means  a  mountain 
height  by  the  sea,  and  was,  therefore,  indicative 
of  the  natural  features  of  the  island.  Again,  there 
is  a  remarkable  analogy,  the  name  applying  with 
equal  aptness  to  the  Samo  of  the  Pacific,  which  are 
regularly  denominated  "  high  islands  "  by  modern 
navigators  to  distinguish  them  from  the  low  islands 
or  coral  atols  by  which  they  are  surrounded  for 
hundreds  of  miles  in  every  direction. 

Again  the  principal  island  in  the  Samoan  group 
is  named  Upola,  which  it  will  be  seen  is  the  equiva 
lent  of  the  Scythian  deity  Apollo,  and  the  chief 
town  on  the  island  Apia,  which  was  the  name  of 
the  Scythian  deity,  the  Earth  (Her.  iv.  59),  and  like 
wise  the  name  of  the  Peloponnesus  (Strabo,  i.  493) 
before  the  advent  of  Pelops,  from  which  the  Phoe 
nicians  shortly  before  had  been  driven  by  the 
Hellenic  invasion. 


THE    WHEREABOUTS    OF    OPHIR     147 

If  we  now  leave  Samoa  and  proceed  to  the 
Society  group,  which  was  apparently  the  next 
stopping  place  of  the  fleets,  we  are  at  once  con 
fronted  by  evidence  equally  significant. 

The  name  usually  written  Tahiti  is  the  same 
as  Tahiti,  the  Scythian  Vista  (Her.  iv.  59).  The 
native  pronunciation  of  the  word  makes  this  quite 
clear,  for  if  we  cut  out  or  make  mute  the  disputable 
consonants  "  b  "  and  "  h  "  which  distinguish  the 
words  it  will  be  found  that  both  names  spell  and 
sound  Taiti,  which,  curiously  enough,  is  the  only 
form  in  which  the  name  is  pronounced  by  the 
natives  of  the  Society  group  to-day,  and  is  the  same 
as  that  reported  by  Bougainville  on  his  discovery 
of  them  (Ency.  Brit.,  xxiii.  22).  The  first  and 
principal  settlement  erected  on  this  group  of  islands, 
situated  like  Apia  at  the  main  opening  of  the 
lagoon,  is  Papeete,  which  is  only  a  slightly 
modified  form  of  the  name  of  the  Scythian  Jupiter 
or  father,  Papeus ;  while  separated  from  Papeete 
by  a  narrow  strait  lies  the  island  of  Mona,  so 
named  from  a  portion  of  the  Greek  Peloponnesus 
or  Apia. 

From  a  review  of  these  data  it  would  seem  that 
the  Phoenicians  pursued  in  the  Pacific  the  same 
policy  as  was  followed  in  the  Mediterranean  by 
establishing  stations  or  colonies  for  the  ships  to 
call  at  on  these  long  voyages.  Moreover,  it  seems 
clear  that  these  settlements  were  placed  under  the 
care  of  reliable  superintendents  or  governors,  drawn 
from  the  Scythians  of  the  marine  corps,  for  practi 
cally  all  the  names  to  which  we  have  called  atten 
tion  were  clearly  drawn  from  this  source.  Apart 
from  their  association  with  the  Phoenicians  as  marines 
on  their  ships  (Her.  vii.  96)  there  are  no  historic 


148    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

facts  that  will  explain  the  presence  of  the  Scythians 
in  the  heart  of  the  Pacific. 

Here,  then,  in  these  Pacific  Islands  was  found 
people  clearly  of  Eastern  Mediterranean  origin 
whose  skill  in  building  and  handling  their  primitive 
craft  won  from  Bougainville,  on  his  discovery  of 
them,  the  name  "  les  iles  des  navigateurs  " — a 
people  so  skilful  in  naval  affairs  that  the  unanimous 
voice  of  the  scientific  world  declares  that  they 
penetrated  to  all  the  islands  of  the  Pacific  from 
Hawaii  to  New  Zealand  and  from  Tonga  to  Tahiti ; 
a  people  whose  numeric  skill,  astronomical  know 
ledge,  cosmogony,  and  religious  system  were  plainly 
Phoenician.  Their  traditions  of  the  creation  of  the 
first  man  and  his  wife  from  the  red  earth,  of  the 
Flood,  and  of  the  sun  being  commanded  to  stand 
still,  along  with  their  practices,  circumcision,  and 
test  of  virginity,  were  clearly  Jewish.  Their  tattoo 
ing  and  spear  and  javelin  throwing  were  as  clearly 
Thracian,  as  their  nomenclature  of  islands  and 
towns,  their  cannibalism,  their  use  of  the  bow  and 
arrow  as  a  test  of  strength,  and  their  worship  of 
the  skulls  of  ancestors  were  peculiarly  Scythian. 
Moreover,  their  implements  of  war  and  their  festivals 
and  games,  as  a  means  of  training  for  the  exigencies 
of  war,  were  the  same  as  those  of  the  nations  of  the 
Eastern  Mediterranean.  It  will,  therefore,  be  seen 
that  we  are  in  possession  of  a  series  of  facts  and  a 
clue  leading  to  a  solution  of  our  enigma.  The 
presence  in  combination  of  four  such  races  in  mid- 
Pacific  as  Jew,  Phoenician,  Scythian,  and  Thracian 
cannot  be  accounted  for  unless  through  the  instru 
mentality  of  the  historic  expeditions  of  Hiram  and 
Solomon. 


CHAPTER   VII 

HEBREW,    PHOENICIAN,    SCYTHIAN,   AND   THRACIAN 
IN   THE   PACIFIC 

Samoan  traditions,  beliefs,  and  usages — Their  Phcenicio-Hebraic  source 
— Phoenician  source  of  the  Tahitian  religious  cult. 

DESCRIBING  the  physical  characteristics  of  the 
Phoenician  people  in  his  scholarly  work,  The  Story 
of  Phoenicia,  Mr.  George  Rawlinson  says :  "  They 
were  of  a  complexion  intermediate  between  the 
pale  faces  of  the  north  and  the  swart  inhabitants 
of  the  south,  having  abundant  hair,  sometimes 
curly  but  never  woolly.  They  were  about  the 
medium  height  and  had  features  not  unlike  the 
Aryans  or  Caucasians,  but  sometimes  less  refined 
and  regular,  the  nose  broadish  and  inclined  to  be 
hooked,  the  lips  a  little  too  full,  and  the  frames 
inclined  to  stoutness  and  massiveness,  while  both  in 
form  and  feature  they  resembled  the  Jews,  who  were 
their  near  neighbours,  and  not  infrequently  inter 
married  with  them/' 

It  would  be  impossible  to  spend  even  a  short 
time  in  Samoa  without  coming  to  realise  how  apt 
such  a  description  is  when  applied  not  only  to  the 
Samoans  but  to  all  the  more  intimately  related 
portions  of  the  Polynesian  race.  Each  day's  obser 
vation  of  the  people  and  their  habits  and  customs 
would  only  deepen  the  conviction  of  the  observer 

that  he  was  in  contact  with  a  race  whose  traditions, 

149 


150    THE    PHCENIC1ANS    AND    AMERICA 

beliefs,  and  usages  could  only  have  been  derived 
from  Phoenicio-Jewish  sources. 

The  only  point  in  Mr.  Rawlinson's  delineation 
in  which  there  is  any  weakness  is  the  nose  ;  and 
this  is  easily  accounted  for  by  a  peculiar  custom 
which  prevails  universally  in  the  islands  of  the 
Central  Pacific  of  manipulating  the  cartilages  while 
the  child  is  still  very  young,  so  that  the  disfigure 
ment  of  the  "  canoe  nose,"  as  they  call  it,  of  the 
Semitic  may  be  removed.  This  custom  is  so  uni 
versal  that  when  omitted,  even  after  long  centuries 
of  isolation,  as  is  sometimes  done  in  the  case  of  the 
long  sickness  or  death  of  a  mother,  the  retention 
of  the  nasal  feature  of  the  Semitic  invariably  earns 
for  the  individual  so  disfigured  the  name  of  "  Native 
Jew." 

Marriage,  too,  is  hedged  about  with  restrictions 
which  clearly  are  either  derived  from  the  Jewish 
law  of  consanguinity  or  denned  according  to  Phoe 
nician,  or,  perhaps,  to  speak  more  correctly,  Aryan 
Totemism.  Again,  the  intensely  spiritual  ideas  of 
the  Deity  possessed  by  the  islanders  and  the  marked 
presence  of  the  Totemic  institutions  afford  further 
evidence  of  a  connection  that  at  some  remote 
period  must  have  existed  between  the  regions  of 
the  Central  Pacific  and  the  Eastern  Mediterranean. 

As  would  naturally  be  expected  from  the  very 
long  period  that  has  elapsed  since  the  date  of  the 
first  settlements  many  other  types  of  people  are 
found  in  the  Pacific ;  this,  however,  does  not  weaken 
but  rather  strengthens  the  weight  of  such  evidence 
as  has  survived  of  the  presence  of  the  composite 
nationality  of  the  fleets  of  Hiram  and  Solomon 
found  in  this  region.  There  can  be  no  question 
that  a  high  type  of  civilisation  of  apparently  identical 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC       151 

origin  prevailed  at  some  possibly  remote  period 
throughout  Central  Polynesia.  No  one  who  is 
familiar  with  the  Samoan  language,  comprised  of 
only  sixteen  letters,  which  are  apparently  the  same 
as  carried  by  Cadmus  into  Greece  (Her.  v.  88),  is 
acquainted  with  the  native  usages  or  the  stone 
remains  to  be  seen  on  Rappa,  Easter,  Ascension, 
Gilbert,  Marshall,  Samoan,  Hawaiian,  and  Society 
Islands,  can  for  a  moment  doubt  its  origin. 

The  relation  of  Strongs  Island  to  this  aspect  of 
our  research  is  peculiarly  interesting.  At  the  en 
trance  to  the  main  harbour  are  to  be  seen  a  quad 
rangular  tower  and  some  stone-lined  canals,  while 
on  the  adjacent  island  of  Lele  may  be  observed 
cyclopean  walls  formed  of  very  large  and  well- 
squared  stones.  These  walls  are  twelve  feet  thick, 
and  in  them  are  vaults  and  secret  passages,  all  the 
work  of  a  stone-building  people.  The  startling 
feature  about  this  island,  however,  is  not  the 
masonry  so  much  as  a  native  tradition,  which  says 
"  That  an  ancient  city  once  stood  round  this  harbour 
which  was  occupied  by  a  powerful  people  called 
Anut,  who  had  large  vessels  in  which  they  made 
long  voyages,  many  moons  being  required  in  their 
prosecution." 

Turning  eastward  and  entering  Mexico  at  the 
line  already  indicated  we  are  at  once  confronted  by 
the  presence  of  the  composite  nationality  intensified 
a  thousandfold,  for  there  we  find  not  only  the 
evidence  of  a  stone-building  people,  but  architectural 
remains  which  bear  these  conglomerate  decorations 
so  peculiar  to  the  bent  of  the  Phoenician  genius. 
Here  also  are  to  be  found  some  essential  portions 
of  the  Jewish  Levitical  code,  the  system  of  regal 
succession  in  use  among  the  Jews  at  the  time  of 


152    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Solomon,  the  nomadic  life,  steam  bathing,  scalping, 
and  cannibalism  of  the  Scythians,  the  tattooing, 
and  the  use  of  buckskins  and  moccasins,  and  the 
lasso  common  to  the  Thracians  (Her.  vii.  75). 

On  the  bronzes,  also,  are  to  be  seen  the  winged 
disc  of  Egypt  and  Phoenicia.  More  amazing  still 
is  the  calendar  stone  or  Piedra  de  Agua,  or  water 
stone,  preserved  in  the  walls  of  the  cathedral  in  the 
ancient  and  capital  city  of  Mexico.  As  we  have 
before  referred  to  this  memorial  nothing  more  need 
be  said,  save  that  one  may  see  at  a  glance  that  it 
is  a  national  monument  of  a  seafaring  people  in  the 
form  of  a  mariner's  compass,  to  the  invention  or  dis 
covery  of  which  they  clearly  enough  seem  to  have 
attributed  the  discovery  of  the  New  World. 

We  have  already  shown  that  of  all  the  islands 
constituting  the  group  called  Sporades  that  lie  off 
the  coasts  of  Asia  Minor,  Samos,  throughout  an 
tiquity,  was  most  famous.  Under  the  enlightened 
though  tyrannical  rule  of  Polycrates  it  became  the 
chief  of  all  the  Hellenic  cities,  and  was  adorned  with 
some  of  the  greatest  public  works  ever  executed  by 
the  Greeks. 

Samos  was  likewise  the  great  naval  emporium 
of  the  Ionic  fleet  and  the  port  from  which  Colacus 
sailed  on  his  memorable  voyage  in  the  first  Greek 
ship  that  penetrated  beyond  the  pillars  of  Hercules 
to  the  Phoenician  port  of  Gades. 

The  transference  of  the  name  Samos  or  Samo  of 
the  Sporades  from  the  Mediterranean  to  the  Pacific, 
with  the  very  unusual  pronunciation  of  the  word, 
was  no  mere  coincidence  but  a  simple  and  natural 
evolution  of  certain  well-determined  historic  events. 
In  the  long  journey  from  Asiatic  coasts  to  those  of 
the  New  World  a  harbour  to  which  the  ships  could 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC       153 

run  in  times  of  stress,  or  at  which  repairs  could  be 
made,  or  water  and  provisions  secured,  would  be 
absolutely  necessary.  In  the  Samoan  group,  then, 
on  the  direct  line  of  these  voyages  they  discovered 
a  place  affording  the  best  natural  harbours  in  the 
Pacific.  So  in  this  sea,  studded  in  every  direction 
with  verdant  palm  and  crowned  coral  atols,  these 
hardy  pioneers  of  civilisation  found  a  group  of 
islands  whose  lofty  summits,  densely  wooded  crests, 
verdant  foot-hills,  and  commodious  natural  harbours 
reminded  them  of  home.  The  perfumed  zephyrs 
that  blew  over  Samoa  were  sweet  as  those  of  "Araby 
the  Blest."  Its  wooded  shores  were  washed  by  seas 
that  rivalled  in  azure  beauty  the  tideless  Aegean, 
and  must  have  carried  them  in  memory  to  the 
Mediterranean,  to  Tyre,  to  Chittim,  to  Samos. 
Need  there  be  wonder,  then,  that  some  of  those 
disembarking  here  to  form  the  nucleus  of  a  colony 
where  the  fleets  might  call  on  their  outward  or  their 
homeward  journey,  should  name  it  after  the  fair 
home  on  the  Aegean  from  which  they  had  been  so 
lately  severed  ? 

The  navigation  of  the  Atlantic  in  the  latitudes 
parallel  to  Gades  and  the  pillars  of  Hercules  is  of 
a  wholly  different  character  from  that  of  the  Pacific 
from  Torres  Straits  to  Samoa  and  the  Pacific  shores 
of  the  American  Continent.  The  Atlantic  is  a 
stormy  sea,  offering  no  shelter,  whereas  the  Pacific, 
especially  on  the  route  of  these  voyages,  is  nowhere 
so  destitute  of  islands  as  to  prevent  it  from  being 
regarded,  like  the  Indian  Ocean,  as  an  inhabited 
sea,  a  view,  curiously  enough,  that  is  clearly  in 
consonance  with  the  American  Votanic  tradition, 
which  correctly  and  beautifully  describes  this  route 
across  the  Pacific  as  the  "  island-strewn  laguna  de 


154    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

terminos/'  or  island-strewn  lake  at  the  end  of  the 
world  (Nat.  Races,  iii.  45). 

This  description,  moreover,  makes  it  clear  that 
the  tradition  was  founded  on  positive  information 
supplied  by  those  who  were  familiar  with  the 
navigation  of  the  Pacific  and  with  the  islands  which 
studded  its  surface  on  the  journey  from  Eziongeber 
to  Mexico.  Reference  has  already  been  made  to 
Strabo's  remarks  relative  to  the  Sidonian-Phcenician 
skill  in  the  use  of  arithmetic  and  astronomy  in  their 
commerce  and  :n  navigating  their  ships  by  night. 
In  his  view  this  set  them  apart  from  all  nations  of 
the  ancient  world.  Now  it  is  a  rather  interesting 
fact  that  it  is  through  the  possession  of  this  know 
ledge  that  we  are  able  to  forge  two  of  the  links  of 
the  chain  of  evidence  that  connects  the  Polynesians 
with  the  Eastern  Mediterranean. 

Mr.  William  Ellis,  for  many  years  the  repre 
sentative  of  the  London  Missionary  Society  in  the 
Society  Islands,  writing  of  the  state  of  society  as 
he  found  it  there  on  his  arrival,  says  in  his  pains 
taking  and  scholarly  work,  Polynesian  Research, 
(vol.  ii.  422),  "  The  acquaintance  of  the  Society 
Islanders  with,  and  their  extensive  use  of,  numbers 
is  surprising.  They  did  not  reckon  by  forties  after 
the  manner  of  the  Sandwich  Islanders,  but  by  a 
declined  method  of  calculation.  They  had  no 
higher  numbers  than  millions ;  they  could,  however, 
by  combinations,  enumerate  with  facility  tens, 
hundreds,  thousands,  tens  of  thousands,  or  hun 
dreds  of  thousands  of  millions.  The  precision, 
regularity,  and  extent  of  their  numbers  has  often 
astonished  me,  and  how  a  people  having,  compara 
tively  speaking,  but  little  necessity  to  use  calcu 
lation  and  being  destitute  of  a  knowledge  of  figures, 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC       155 

should  have  originated  and  matured  such  a  system 
is  in  itself  wonderful,  and  appears  more  than  any 
other  fact  to  favour  the  opinion  that  the  islands 
were  peopled  from  a  country  whose  inhabitants 
were  highly  civilised." 

The  natives  of  most  of  these  islands,  adults  and 
children  alike,  appear  to  be  remarkably  fond  of 
figures  and  calculation,  and  receive  the  elements 
of  arithmetic  with  great  facility  and  seeming  delight, 
and  many  of  their  numerals  are  precisely  the  same 
as  those  used  by  the  people  of  the  Asiatic  Islands 
and  also  on  the  remote  and  populous  island  of 
Madagascar. 

This  testimony,  coming  from  an  independent 
and  reliable  source  before  the  islands  were  invaded 
by  the  outside  world,  is  extremely  valuable,  be 
cause  it  provides  such  information  as  is  absolutely 
necessary  to  the  solution  of  our  enigma.  Mr. 
Ellis's  only  object  in  reporting  his  observations,  was 
a  desire  to  communicate  to  Christian  communities 
who  had  undertaken  the  financial  responsibility  of 
this  great  work  of  uplifting  the  dark  places  of  the 
earth,  correct  information  with  respect  to  the 
actual  conditions  that  confronted  those  to  whom 
the  active  work  was  entrusted.  It  is  necessary  to 
make  this  clear,  as  we  shall  have  to  rely  much 
on  the  report  of  Mr.  Ellis  in  our  further  inves 
tigation. 

The  astronomical  correspondence  between  the 
Society  Islands  and  the  Eastern  Mediterranean  is 
even  more  striking.  To  the  ancients,  but  especially 
to  the  seafaring  Phoenicians,  some  method  of  de 
termining  the  season  of  safe  navigation  was  im 
perative,  and  this,  as  we  have  shown,  they  secured 
by  means  of  their  astronomical  observations.  The 


156    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

group  of  stars  known  to  the  Greeks  as  the  Pleiades 
was  found  to  furnish  just  such  an  infallible  guide  as 
they  required ;  the  date  of  their  rising  and  setting 
agreeing  respectively  with  the  beginning  and  end  of 
the  season  during  which  navigation  was  found  to  be 
safe.  It  is  more  than  probable  that  the  first  obser 
vation  of  the  value  of  this  group  was  made  by  the 
Phoenicians,  and  that  through  them  valuable  astrono 
mical  and  navigating  knowledge  was  communicated 
to  the  Egyptians  and  Jews.  Josephus,  in  one  of 
his  few  references  to  astronomical  phenomena,  em 
ploys  the  setting  of  the  Pleiades  to  mark  a  date, 
and  the  reference  in  Job  xxxviii.  31  :  "  Canst  thou 
bind  the  cluster  of  the  Pleiades  or  loose  the  bands 
of  Orion  ?  "  has  undoubted  reference  to  the  rise  and 
overflow  of  the  Nile,  which  was  heralded  each  year 
by  the  heliacal  rising  of  Sirius  on  the  day  of  the 
summer  solstice.  Mr.  Ellis,  in  writing  of  the  astro 
nomical  knowledge  of  the  Society  Islanders,  calls 
particular  attention  to  the  similarity  of  the  names 
of  some  of  the  stars  and  groups  and  the  use  to  which 
this  knowledge  was  applied  in  the  early  centres  of 
civilisation  in  the  old  world  and  Polynesia,  as  in 
dicating  an  early  communication  between  these  two 
widely  separated  regions  of  the  world.  He  says 
(vol.  iii.  167)  :  "  The  natives  of  the  islands  were 
also  accustomed  in  some  degree  to  notice  the  appear 
ance  and  position  of  the  stars  especially  at  sea. 
These  were  their  only  guides  when  steering  their 
fragile  barks  across  the  deep.  When  setting  out 
on  a  voyage  some  particular  star  or  constellation 
was  selected  as  their  guide  during  the  night.  This 
they  called  their  aveia,  and  by  this  name  they  now 
designate  the  compass,  because  it  answers  the  same 
purpose.  The  Pleiades  were  a  favourite  aveia,  and 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC       157 

by  this  we  now  steered  on  the  present  voyage  during 
the  night." 

Interesting  as  the  connection  is,  it  does  not  by 
any  means  exhaust  the  evidence  available  for  proof 
of  a  Mediterranean  origin  for  the  Polynesian. 
Polynesians  possessed  two  traditions  of  exclusively 
Jewish  and  Phoenician  origin  associated  with  the 
sun.  These  are  recorded  by  Mr.  Ellis  as  a  portion 
of  the  Tahitean  folklore,  which  are  so  closely  identical 
in  form  with  those  of  the  sources  from  which  they 
were  drawn,  that  it  is  impossible  to  conceive  of  them 
reaching  the  islands  of  Central  Polynesia  except  at 
first  hand  from  Phoenicia  and  Palestine  ;  and  this 
the  more  so  that  one  of  them  refers  to  a  historic 
event  of  the  first  importance  in  Jewish  history 
which  took  place  only  400  years  before  the  date  of 
these  expeditions. 

In  Joshua  x.  12-14  it  is  written  :  "  And  Joshua 
said  in  the  sight  of  Israel,  Sun,  stand  thou  still 
upon  Gibeon ;  and  thou  Moon,  in  the  valley  of  Ajalon. 
Aiid  the  sun  stood  still,  and  the  moon  stayed,  until 
the  people  had  avenged  themselves  upon  their 
enemies.  Is  not  this  written  in  the  book  of  Jasher  ? 
So  the  sun  stood  still  in  the  midst  of  heaven,  and 
hasted  not  to  go  down  about  a  whole  day.  And 
there  was  no  day  like  that  before  or  after  it,  that  the 
Lord  hearkened  unto  the  voice  of  a  man ;  for  the 
Lord  fought  for  Israel/' 

The  Society  Island  tradition  which  corresponds  to 
this  is,  as  might  be  expected  after  the  lapse  of  nearly 
thirty  centuries,  much  garbled ;  still,  in  its  essential 
features,  its  identity  with  the  Jewish  original  is 
most  striking. 

"  One  of  the  singular  traditions  respecting  the 
sun/'  says  Mr.  Ellis  (vol.  iii.  170),  "  deserves  special 


158    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

attention  from  the  analogy  which  it  presents  to  a 
fact  recorded  in  Jewish  history.  It  is  related  that 
Mani,  an  ancient  priest  or  chieftain,  was  building  a 
marae  or  temple  which  it  was  necessary  to  finish 
before  the  close  of  day,  but  perceiving  that  the 
sun  was  declining  and  that  it  was  likely  to  sink 
before  it  was  finished,  he  seized  it  by  its  rays  and 
bound  them  by  a  cord  to  the  marae  or  an  adjacent 
tree  and  then  proceeded  with  his  work  till  the 
marae  was  completed,  the  sun  remaining  stationary 
during  the  whole  period/'  Mr.  Ellis  adds :  '  I 
refrain  from  all  comment  on  the  singular  tradition, 
which  was  almost  universally  received  over  the 
islands/'  The  other  tradition  is  even  more  re 
markable  in  that  it  is  clearly  identified  with  the 
presence  of  both  Jew  and  Phoenician  in  the  Pacific 
and  is  reproduced  with  more  exactness.  The 
Jewish  account  is  found  in  Genesis  i.  16  and  reads 
as  follows  :  "  And  God  made  two  great  lights,  the 
greater  to  rule  the  day  and  the  lesser  to  rule  by 
night,  he  made  stars  also/'  This  view  differed 
wholly  from  that  of  the  Phoenicians  among  whom 
Baal  was  represented  as  the  son  of  El  and  the 
practical  ruler  of  the  world  during  the  current  cycle 
with  a  solar  aspect  being  actually  identified  with 
the  physical  sun.  Among  the  Phoenicians  the  myth 
took  a  peculiar  form,  for  from  the  pillars  of  Hercules 
the  world  was  supposed  to  end.  The  sun,  plunging 
nightly  into  the  ocean  flood  with  a  hissing  sound, 
was  believed  to  pass  by  some  subterranean  passage 
to  the  place  of  his  rising  in  the  East. 

If  we  compare  these  two  traditions  with  that 
of  the  Polynesians  it  will  be  seen  that  there  is  no 
possible  room  for  doubt  as  to  the  sources  from  which 
they  were  received.  Mr.  Ellis  says  (vol.  iii.  170)  : 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC       159 

"  With  respect  to  the  sun,  which  they  formerly 
called  Ra  and  more  recently  Mahoma,  some  of  the 
traditions  state  that  it  was  the  offspring  of  the  gods 
and  was  an  animated  being,  others  that  it  was 
made  by  the  supreme  deity  Taaroa.  The  latter 
supposed  it  to  be  a  substance  that  resembled  fire. 
The  people  imagined  that  it  sank  every  evening 
into  the  sea  and  passed  by  some  subterranean 
passage  from  west  to  east,  where  it  rose  again  from 
the  sea  in  the  morning.  In  some  of  the  islands 
the  expression  for  the  setting  sun  is  the  falling  of 
the  sun  into  the  sea.  They  say  that  some  people 
in  Bora-bora,  the  most  westerly  island  in  the  group, 
once  heard  the  hissing  sound  occasioned  by  its 
plunging  into  the  ocean/' 

These  correspondences  with  the  Jewish  and 
Phoenician  traditions  are  sufficiently  startling  to 
arrest  the  attention  of  the  most  casual  inquirer 
and  make  it  clear  that  it  will  be  profitable  to  prose 
cute  the  study  still  further,  for  the  observation  and 
knowledge  of  the  heavenly  bodies  among  the  Poly 
nesians  was  not  confined  to  the  sun  and  Pleiades ; 
they  steered  by  the  Southern  Cross  as  well  as  the 
Pleiades. 

According  to  the  Scripture  narrative  the  method 
of  computing  time  among  the  Jews  was  by  genera 
tions.  For  example  Genesis  v.  says  :  '  This  is  the 
book  of  the  generation  of  Adam,"  and  Genesis  x.  i, 
"  These  are  the  generations  of  Shem."  Among  the 
Phoenicians  at  the  date  of  these  expeditions  time 
was  measured  by  the  Solar  Year,  and  the  seasons  of 
agriculture  and  navigation,  as  we  have  shown,  by 
the  rising  and  setting  of  the  Pleiades,  so  that  it  is 
interesting  to  find  not  one  but  both  of  these  systems 
in  operation  in  the  Society  Islands  where  they  were 


160    THE    PHGENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

first  discovered.  Says  Mr.  Ellis  :  "  One  method  of 
computing  time  in  the  Society  Islands  was  by  Uis 
or  generations,  but  the  most  general  mode  of  calcu 
lation  was  by  the  year  which  they  called  Matahiti, 
and  which  consisted  of  twelve  or  thirteen  lunar 
months,  by  the  tan  or  Matarii  season  or  half-year,  by 
the  month  of  thirty  days  or  by  the  day  and  night 
having  a  distinct  name  for  each  month  and  being 
in  general  agreement  about  the  length  of  the  year. 
Another  method  commenced  the  year  at  the  month 
of  Apaapa  or  the  middle  of  May  and  gave  different 
names  to  several  of  the  months.  The  year  was 
divided  into  two  seasons  of  Mata-rii  or  Pleiades. 
The  first  was  called  Mata-rii-i-nia  or  Pleiades  above. 
It  commenced  when,  in  the  evening,  the  stars 
appeared  on  or  near  the  horizon,  and  the  half-year 
during  which  immediately  after  sunset  they  were 
seen  above  the  horizon  was  called  Mata-rii-i-nia. 
The  other  season  commenced  when  at  sunset  the 
stars  were  invisible  and  continued  until  at  that  hour 
they  appeared  above  the  horizon.  This  season  they 
called  Mata-rii-i-raro  or  the  Pleiades  above/' 

Let  us  now  pass  from  the  consideration  of  the 
evidence  which  the  astronomical  knowledge  of  the 
Society  Islanders  affords  of  the  presence  of  the 
Phoenician- Jewish  expeditions  in  the  Pacific  and 
see  what  evidence  can  be  obtained  of  the  presence 
of  the  Scythians  and  Thracians  who  formed  a 
portion  of  the  command  and  crews  of  the  ships  of 
Hiram  and  Solomon. 

While  tattooing  was  strictly  forbidden  to  the 
Jews,  it  was  common  in  the  Mediterranean  basin, 
especially  among  the  Illyrians  of  the  Adriatic  and 
the  Thracians.  That  it  was  a  Canaanitish  and 
Phoenician  custom  is  more  than  probable  from  the 


PHCENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC       161 

injunctions  against  the  practice  given  by  Moses  to 
the  Jews  before  their  entry  into  the  promised 
land. 

Dr.  George  Turner,  for  over  twenty  years  the 
representative  of  the  London  Missionary  Society  in 
Samoa,  and  the  author  of  Nineteen  Years  in  Polynesia 
and  Samoa,  two  of  the  most  valuable  works  existing 
on  the  state  of  native  society  in  that  part  of  the 
Pacific  when  it  was  first  discovered  by  Europeans, 
makes  what  is  undoubtedly  the  right  connection 
with  the  custom  of  tattooing  as  he  found  it  on  his 
arrival  in  Samoa  when  he  says :  "  Herodotus 
found  among  the  Thracians  that  the  barbarians 
could  be  exceedingly  foppish,  for  among  them  the 
man  that  was  not  tattooed  was  not  respected.  It 
was  the  same  in  Samoa,  for  until  a  man  was  tattooed 
he  was  considered  in  his  minority.  He  could  not 
think  of  marriage,  and  was  constantly  exposed  to 
taunt  and  ridicule  as  being  poor  and  of  low  birth 
and  having  no  right  to  speak  in  the  society  of  men. 
When,  however,  he  was  tattooed  he  passed  into  his 
majority  and  was  entitled  to  all  the  respect  and 
privilege  accorded  to  those  of  mature  years.  When, 
therefore,  a  youth  reached  the  age  of  sixteen  he  and 
his  friends  were  all  anxiety  that  he  should  be 
tattooed,  and  he  was  on  the  outlook  for  the  tattoo 
ing  of  some  young  chief  with  whom  he  might  unite, 
six  or  a  dozen  young  men  being  tattooed  at  one  time, 
and  for  these  four  or  five  tattooers  were  employed." 

The  process  was  a  long  and  painful  one,  and  the 
instruments  employed  were  usually  made  from  a 
piece  of  human  bone,  the  "  os  ilium/'  "  oblong  in 
shape  and  about  an  inch  and  a  half  long  by  two 
inches  broad,  being  cut  on  one  side  like  a  small 
tooth  comb  and  the  other  fastened  to  a  piece  of 

L 


162    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

cane,  so  that  it  looked  like  a  small  serrated  adze. 
In  using  the  instrument  they  dipped  it  into  a 
mixture  of  candle  nut  ashes  and  matter,  and, 
tapping  it  with  a  small  wooden  mallet,  it  sank  into 
the  skin,  and  in  this,  as  among  the  Thracians,  punc 
tured  the  whole  surface  over  which  the  tattooing 
extended/' 

In  Samoa  the  greater  part  of  the  body  from  the 
waist  down  to  the  knee  was  thus  covered,  variegated 
here  and  there  with  regular  strips  of  the  untattooed 
skin  which,  when  well  oiled,  made  the  natives  appear 
in  the  distance  as  if  they  wore  black  silk  knee 
breeches,  from  which  it  will  be  seen  that  the  tattoo 
ing  was  of  Thracian  and  not  of  Phoenician  origin. 

Tattooing  attained  its  highest  development  as 
a  decorative  art  among  the  Marquesan  islanders 
and  the  Maoris  of  New  Zealand.  The  practice, 
however,  both  from  the  Totemic  and  the  Thracian 
point  of  view,  was  almost  universal  on  the  American 
Continent  from  Alaska  to  Mexico,  and  was  performed 
as  in  Samoa  by  regular  professors  of  the  art,  submis 
sion  to  the  process  being  demanded  from  the  young 
men  as  a  sign  of  bravery  (Nat.  Races,  ii.  733). 

In  the  practice  of  embalming  we  have  another 
valuable  means  of  establishing  a  correspondence 
between  the  Eastern  Mediterranean  and  the  Pacific. 
Among  the  Egyptians  this  practice  was  carried  to 
great  perfection,  not  only  human  remains  but  those 
of  cats,  crocodiles,  and  other  sacred  animals  being 
subjected  to  embalming.  This  was  thought  to  in 
dicate  a  high  degree  of  civilisation,  yet  it  is  found 
to  have  prevailed  among  the  Polynesians  (Poly.  Res., 
i.  44),  among  the  ancient  Toltecs  of  Mexico,  and,  to 
some  extent,  in  the  entire  Pacific  states  of  the 
Continent  (Nat.  Races,  ii.  603). 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC        163 

Equally  remarkable  is  the  evidence  showing  that 
the  cannibalism  of  the  Polynesians  and  the  early 
American  races  was  derived  from  the  Mediterranean. 
The  Lsestrygians  of  Sicily  were  cannibals.  Accord 
ing  to  Strabo,  iv.  5,  to  eat  human  flesh  was  a 
Scythian  custom.  Herodotus  gives  a  description  of 
it  among  the  tribes  (the  Issedones,  iv.  26)  who  ate 
their  own  parents  after  sacrificing  them,  and  the 
Androphagi  (iv.  106),  who,  like  the  Laestrygians  of 
Sicily,  seem  to  have  been  indifferent  who  the  victim 
was.  Like  tattooing  and  embalming  this  horrible 
practice  was  not  confined  to  the  insular  Pacific,  but 
extended  to  the  Pacific  slopes  of  the  American 
Continent.  The  Aztecs  especially  being  notorious, 
like  the  Scythians,  for  their  cannibalism. 

There  are  other  evidences  of  the  presence  of  the 
Scythians  in  the  insular  Pacific  and  America  of  a 
most  remarkable  kind,  to  which  it  is  desirable  to 
call  attention.  But  before  doing  so  it  will  be  ad 
visable  to  revert  for  a  little  to  the  subject  of  the 
language  of  the  Polynesians,  for,  viewed  in  connec 
tion  with  the  other  correspondences,  it  seems  as  if 
further  research  in  this  direction  would  lead  to 
far-reaching  results. 

Herodotus  (i.  142),  in  speaking  of  the  dialectical 
differences  to  be  found  in  the  language  used  by  the 
peoples  who  occupied  the  territory  from  which  the 
Phoenicians  were  drawn  by  the  Ionic  Greeks,  makes 
this  significant  statement :  "  These  people  do  not 
all  use  the  same  language,  but  have  four  varieties 
of  dialect.  Miletus,  the  first  of  these,  lay  to  the 
south,  next  came  Myus  and  Prine,  which  were 
situated  in  Caria  and  used  the  same  dialect. 
Ephesus,  Colophon,  Lebidus,  Teos,  Phocia,  Clazo- 
mene,  cities  in  Lydia,  did  not  agree  with  the  language 


164    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

spoken  in  Miletus,  Myus,  and  Prine,  but  spoke  a 
dialect  common  to  themselves.  There  still  re 
mained  three  Ionian  cities,  two  of  which  inhabited 
islands,  Samos  and  Chios,  and  one,  Erythrae,  situated 
on  the  Continent.  The  Chians  and  Erythrenes 
used  the  same  dialect,  but  the  inhabitants  of  Samos 
had  one  peculiar  to  themselves." 

Here  is  the  crux  of  the  situation,  for  the  prob 
abilities  are  that  by  dovetailing  this  passage  with 
another  from  the  same  author  (v.  58)  some  valu 
able  information  will  be  obtained  as  to  the  source 
from  which  the  sixteen  letters  of  the  Polynesian 
language  were  derived.  Says  Herodotus  :  "  When 
the  Phoenicians  who  came  with  Cadmus  settled  in 
this  country  they  introduced  the  sixteen  letters  of 
the  Phoenician  alphabet,  which,  in  my  opinion,  were 
not  before  known  in  Greece.  At  first  they  used  the 
characters  which  all  the  Phoenicians  made  use  of, 
but  afterward,  in  process  of  time,  together  with  the 
sound  they  also  changed  the  shape  of  the  letters,  and 
as  at  that  time  the  Ionian  Greeks  inhabited  the 
greater  part  of  the  country  round  about  them,  they, 
having  learned  these  letters  from  the  Phoenicians, 
changed  them  in  a  slight  manner  and  made  use  of 
them,  and  in  making  use  of  them  designated  them 
Phoenician,  as  justice  required  they  should,  since  it 
was  the  Phoenicians  who  introduced  them  into 
Greece." 

Let  us  now  return  to  a  consideration  of  such 
further  evidence  of  the  presence  of  the  Scythian  in 
the  Pacific.  To  one  of  these  it  is  advisable  to  call 
particular  attention,  for  the  usage  is  so  significant  of 
the  presence  of  that  people  "  who  were  all  equestrian 
archers  "  (Her.  iv.  46).  "  The  King  and  his  Con 
sort/'  says  Mr.  Ellis,  "  always  appeared  in  public 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC       165 

seated  on  men's  shoulders,  and  travelled  in  this 
manner  wherever  they  journeyed  by  land.  The 
bearers  were  generally  stout  athletic  men,  and  their 
persons,  in  consequence  of  the  office  to  which  they 
were  appointed,  were  considered  sacred.  Their 
majesties  thus  elevated  seemed  to  sit  at  ease  and  in 
security,  holding  slightly  by  the  head  while  their 
feet  hung  down  on  the  breasts  of  the  bearers  and 
were  clasped  in  his  arms.  They  usually  travelled 
at  a  tolerably  rapid  pace,  even  as  much  as  six  miles 
within  an  hour  being  covered.  A  number  of  these 
bearers  accompanied  the  royal  pair,  and  when  the 
men  who  carried  their  majesties  grew  fatigued  they 
were  relieved  by  others.  The  change  from  the 
shoulders  of  one  bearer  to  another  was  accomplished 
with  great  dispatch,  but  as  the  King  and  his  Consort 
were  forbidden  on  these  occasions  to  allow  their 
feet  to  touch  the  ground  when  they  required  to 
change,  the  men  on  whose  shoulders  they  were 
sitting  made  only  a  temporary  halt,  and  the  bearer 
who  was  appointed  to  take  them  forward  on  their 
journey  stepped  in  front  and,  placing  his  hands  on 
his  thighs,  bent  his  head  slightly  forward,  and  when 
he  had  assumed  this  position  the  royal  riders,  with 
apparently  but  little  effort,  vaulted  over  the  head 
of  the  man  on  whose  neck  they  had  been  riding, 
and,  alighting  on  the  shoulders  of  his  successor  in 
office,  proceeded  on  the  journey  with  the  slightest 
possible  detention. 

' '  The  seat  occupied  by  the  rider  was  probably  not 
the  most  comfortable,  yet  it  indicated  the  highest 
dignity  of  the  nation,  none  but  the  King  and  Queen 
and  occasionally  their  nearest  relatives  being  per 
mitted  the  distinction  it  exhibited,  and  there  is 
no  doubt  that  it  was  viewed  by  them  with  com- 


166    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

placency  and  satisfaction  as  a  means  of  commanding 
the  respect  of  their  subjects  whenever  they  left 
their  hereditary  districts.  It  is  said  that  King 
Pomare  the  Second  was  so  possessed  by  this  idea 
that  he  once  remarked  that  he  was  a  greater  man 
than  King  George  of  England,  because  he  only  rode 
a  horse  while  he  rode  a  man  "  (vol.  iii.  102). 

Still  further  evidence  of  the  Scythians  in  Tahiti 
is  found  in  a  custom  to  which  Herodotus  (iv.  26) 
called  attention  as  in  use  among  the  Issedones, 
i.e.  the  preserving  of  the  skulls  of  deceased  an 
cestors  and  of  treating  them  as  sacred  memorials. 
The  custom  was  equally  in  use  among  the  Tahitians 
(Pol.  Res.,  iii.  272),  the  skulls  of  ancestors  being  pre 
served  with  the  greatest  care  as  the  dwelling-places 
of  the  spirits  of  the  deceased  who  at  death  became 
the  guardian  divinities  of  the  family.  Indeed  on 
the  occasion  of  the  marriage  of  any  member  of  the 
family  these  were  brought  to  the  Marae,  or  temple, 
and  placed  on  a  piece  of  white  cloth  before  the 
contracting  parties  as  witnesses  to  the  assumption 
of  the  marriage  vows. 

Again  the  usage  of  the  Carian  women  (Her.  i. 
146)  of  Samos,  who  established  a  law  and  imposed 
it  on  themselves  with  an  oath,  and  transmitted  it 
to  their  daughters,  that  they  would  never  eat  with 
their  husbands  because  they  had  killed  their 
fathers,  husbands,  and  children,  and  forced  them  to 
become  their  wives  was,  to  some  extent,  even  in 
spite  of  the  adoption  of  Christianity,  still  operative 
in  Samoa  and  Tahiti.  This  custom  has  by  some 
writers  been  referred  to  as  derived  from  the  institutes 
of  Menu,  which  forbade  a  Brahmin  to  eat  with  his 
wife  (Pol.  Res.,  i.  116),  but  the  attempted  allocation 
of  the  custom  to  this  source  is  clearly  in  error,  for 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC        167 

we  can  establish  no  connection  between  India  and 
the  Samoan  and  Society  Islands,  whereas  we  have 
no  difficulty,  as  we  have  shown,  in  making  such  a 
connection  between  Samos  of  the  Sporades  and  these 
islands. 

From  these  correspondences  established  between 
the  strange  customs  of  the  Eastern  Mediterranean 
and  the  Pacific,  which  are  only  a  few  of  many 
available,  it  will  be  seen  that  a  very  intimate  and 
continuous  intercourse  must  have  existed  between 
these  distant  regions  for  a  considerable  period,  re 
sulting  in  the  importing  of  a  mixed  population 
which  made  permanent  settlements.  There  is  to 
be  found  among  the  islands  of  the  Pacific  not  only 
Thracian  tattooing  and  Scythian  cannibalism,  eques 
trianism,  archery,  and  skull  worship,  but  sling-men, 
boxers,  wrestlers,  javelin -throwers,  spearmen,  the 
whole  being  overshadowed  by  the  prevailing  influ 
ence  of  Jewish  religious  tradition  and  Phoenician 
naval  skill,  scientific  knowledge,  and  religious 
practice. 

In  order  that  the  case  may,  however,  be  pre 
sented  in  a  manner  that  will  remove  all  possible 
doubt,  let  us  look  for  a  little  at  some  of  the  early 
Polynesian  myths,  which  show  how  impossible  it 
is  for  us  rationally  to  refer  the  origin  of  the  race 
to  any  other  source  than  that  to  which  we  have 
assigned  it. 

A  tradition  very  generally  received  in  Tahiti 
when  it  was  first  discovered  was  that  the  first  human 
pair  were  made  by  the  supreme  deity  Taaroa.  They 
said  that  after  Taaroa  had  formed  the  world  he 
created  man  out  of  the  araea,  or  red  earth,  which  was 
also  the  food  of  man  until  bread  fruit  was  created. 
The  tradition  goes  on  to  say  that  one  day  Taaroa 


168    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

called  for  the  man  by  name,  and  when  he  came  he 
caused  him  to  fall  asleep,  and  that  while  he  slept 
he  took  out  one  of  his  ivi,  or  bones,  and  with  it  made 
a  woman,  whom  he  gave  to  man  to  be  his  wife, 
and  that  this  pair  became  the  progenitors  of  the 
human  race. 

Now  it  is  interesting  to  observe  that  this  account 
of  the  creation  of  the  first  human  pair  appeared  to 
the  first  of  the  missionaries  arriving  there  to  be  so 
clearly  derived  from  the  Mosaic  sources  that  they 
were  at  their  wits'  end  to  know  how  they  came  by  it. 

The  singular  fact  about  the  tradition  is,  how 
ever,  that  it  explicitly  states  that  the  name  of  the 
woman  was  Ivi,  which  is  pronounced  among  them 
as  if  written  Eve. 

Mr.  Ellis,  speaking  of  the  singularity  of  these 
facts,  says  :  "  It  always  appeared  to  me  as  a  mere 
recital  of  the  Mosaic  account  of  Creation  which  they 
had  learned  from  some  European  source,  and  I  have 
never  placed  any  reliance  on  it,  although  they  have 
repeatedly  told  me  that  it  was  a  tradition  among 
them  before  any  foreigners  arrived/'  He  then 
adds  :  "  Should,  however,  more  careful  and  minute 
inquiry  confirm  the  truth  of  the  declaration  and 
prove  that  the  account  was  in  existence  among 
them  prior  to  their  intercourse  with  Europeans,  it 
will  be  one  of  the  most  remarkable  oral  traditions 
of  the  human  race  known/' 

Fortunately  enough  we  are  not  left  in  doubt  as 
to  the  reliability  of  the  native  tradition,  for  Mr. 
Ellis  is  corroborated  by  Dr.  George  Turner,  whom 
we  have  already  quoted.  He  says  in  his  Samoa  : 
"  The  natives  of  Fakaofo  or  Bowditch  Island 
say  that  man  had  his  origin  in  a  small  stone  or 
Fakaofo.  The  stone  became  changed  into  a  man 


PHCENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC       169 

called  Vase-fanu.  After  a  time  he  thought  of 
making  a  woman.  This  he  did  by  collecting  a 
quantity  of  earth  and  forming  an  earth  model  on 
the  ground.  He  made  a  head,  body,  and  legs  of 
earth,  then  took  out  a  rib  from  his  left  side  and 
threw  it  inside  the  earth  model,  when  suddenly  the 
earth  became  alive  and  up  started  a  woman  on  her 
feet.  He  called  her  Ivi  (Eve)  or  rib.  He  took  her 
to  be  his  wife  and  from  them  sprang  the  race  of 


men/' 


Dr.  Turner,  who  lived  in  Central  Polynesia 
before  the  arrival  of  Europeans,  had  no  hesitation 
in  accepting  the  tradition  as  of  native  origin,  and 
says  :  "To  this  day  the  children  play  on  the  sands 
making  men,  body,  hands,  feet  and  face  and  holes 
for  eyes/' 

Now  a  comparison  of  the  Tahitian  and  Bow- 
ditch  Island  traditions  with  the  Hebrew  narrative 
will  make  it  clear  that  these  traditions  reached  the 
Pacific  Islands  from  no  other  source  than  that  of 
the  Jews,  for  in  Genesis  ii.  we  read  :  "  And  the 
Lord  God  formed  man  out  of  the  dust  of  the  ground 
and  breathed  into  his  nostrils  the  breath  of  life  and 
man  became  a  living  soul.  And  the  Lord  God 
caused  a  deep  sleep  to  fall  on  Adam,  and  he  slept, 
and  he  took  one  of  his  ribs  and  closed  up  the  flesh 
instead  thereof,  and  the  rib  which  the  Lord  God  had 
taken  from  man,  made  he  a  woman  and  brought  her 
unto  the  man,  and  Adam  said  :  This  is  now  bone  of 
my  bone  and  flesh  of  my  flesh,  she  shall  be  called 
Woman  because  she  was  taken  from  Man/'  "  And 
Adam  called  his  wife's  name  Eve  because  she  was 
the  mother  of  all  living  "  (Gen.  iii.  20). 

Having  called  attention  to  the  evidences  which 
still  exist  of  the  presence  of  Thracian,  Scythian, 


170    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

and  Jew  in  the  Pacific,  it  will  be  profitable  now  to 
look  at  the  evidence  which  the  region  affords  of  its 
occupancy  by  the  Phoenicians,  for  after  all  it  is 
upon  it  rather  than  upon  that  supporting  the 
presence  of  any  other  of  the  nations  that  we  must 
rely  for  the  final  results  of  our  investigation.  Why  ? 
Because,  as  had  been  shown,  Phoenicia  was  the  only 
navigating  power  of  that  period,  and  the  only 
nation  capable  of  making  either  this  voyage  or 
including  such  a  combination  of  races  in  the  under 
taking.  It  is  well,  therefore,  to  bear  in  mind  that 
while  the  presence  of  these  other  various  peoples  at 
such  a  distance  from  the  Mediterranean  basin  is 
interesting,  indeed  invaluable,  as  a  means  of  proving 
the  correctness  of  our  induction,  still  the  existence 
of  Jew,  Scythian,  and  Thracian  could  not  in  them 
selves  solve  our  problem  unless  it  could  be  shown, 
in  the  clearest  possible  manner,  that  after  all  Jew, 
Scythian,  and  Thracian  were  only  a  minor  premise 
in  the  major  proportion  of  the  presence  of  Phoenicia 
in  the  Pacific.  The  Phoenicians  were  a  pre-emi 
nently  religious  people,  and  in  this  respect,  indeed, 
only  represented  the  general  trend  of  the  thought 
of  the  Semitic  race  at  large.  The  temple  in  each 
community  was  the  common  centre  round  which 
the  life  of  the  people  revolved.  The  piety  of  the 
inhabitants  manifested  itself,  as  a  rule,  in  the 
abundant  and  costly  gifts  with  which  they  adorned 
the  temple.  Much  of  this  statement  is  equally  true 
of  the  Jews  and  the  Egyptians,  but,  as  it  is  neces 
sary  in  a  study  of  this  nature  to  avoid  generalities, 
we  will  only  emphasize  those  points  in  which  the 
Phoenicians  were  not  in  general  agreement  with 
their  neighbours,  so  that  there  may  be  no  possibility 
of  error  in  our  recognition  of  the  characteristics  of 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC        171 

the  Phoenician  belief  and  practice  when  we  discover 
them  in  Central  America. 

There  are  some  phases  of  the  Phoenician  religious 
cult  that  seem  clearly  enough  to  distinguish  it  from 
all  the  other  religious  systems  of  antiquity.  These 
were  an  intensely  spiritual  conception  of  the  duty, 
which  later  degenerated  into  Polytheism  with  Tote- 
mism  and  human  sacrifice,  and  the  cult  of  the  Galli 
or  priest  of  Astarte,  with  which  was  associated  a 
boundless  licentiousness. 

'  The  essential  feature  of  the  Phoenician  religion 
and  the  people  who  hold  it,"  says  Professor  Sayce, 
"  was  at  once  impure  and  cruel.  It  reflected  the 
sensualism  of  nature.  Intoxicated  with  the  frenzy 
of  nature  worship  under  the  burning  sky  of  the 
East,  the  Canaanite  destroyed  his  children,  maimed 
himself,  or  became  the  slave  of  consecrated  lust. 
Men  and  women  sought  to  win  the  favour  of  Heaven 
by  sodomy  and  prostitution  in  the  temple  of  Astarte. 
This  practice,  indeed,  was  brought  from  Babylon 
along  with  the  sacrifice  of  the  first  born,  and  though 
we  may  ascribe  the  origin  of  the  latter  to  the  Ac- 
cadians,  an  Accadian  text  expressly  stating  that 
sin  may  be  expiated  by  the  vicarious  sacrifice  of 
the  eldest  son,  yet  the  immorality  practised  in  the 
name  of  religion  was  the  invention  of  the  Semitic 
race  itself." 

The  principal  seat  of  the  Phoenician  religious 
prostitution  was  Apheca,  near  the  sources  of  the 
river  Adonis  in  Lebanon.  So  fascinated  were  the 
people  with  this  mode  of  expressing  their  religious 
conceptions,  that  the  temple  became  enormously 
rich. 

Dr.  Dollinger,  than  whom  there  is  no  greater 
authority  on  the  subject,  gives  a  brief  but  vivid 


i;2    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

account  of  the  practice  of  religion  in  Phoenicia 
during  the  reign  of  Ethbaal,  which  is  so  luminous 
when  read  in  connection  with  the  statement  of 
Professor  Sayce  that  we  cannot  do  better  than 
quote  it  in  extenso.  The  quotation  is  taken  from 
his  Heidenthum  and  Judenthum  (vol.  i.  426).  "  In 
early  times  Baal  had  been  worshipped  without  an 
image  in  Tyre  and  its  Colonies,  but  for  a  long  time 
now  his  worship  had  grown  into  an  idolatry  of  the 
most  wanton  character  directed  by  a  numerous 
priesthood,  who  had  headquarters  at  Tyre ;  his 
statue  rode  upon  bulls,  for  the  bull  was  the  symbol 
of  the  creative  power,  and  he  was  also  represented 
with  branches  of  grapes  and  pomegranates  in  his 
hands.  As  the  people  of  Asia  distinguished,  properly 
speaking,  only  two  deities  of  nature,  a  male  and  a 
female,  so  Baal  was  of  an  elemental  and  sidereal 
character  at  once.  As  the  former  he  was  God  of 
the  creative  power,  bringing  all  things  into  life,  and 
in  particular  God  of  Fire,  but  he  was  Sun  God 
besides,  and  as  such  to  human  lineaments  he  added 
the  Crown  of  Rays  about  his  head  peculiar  to  this 
God.  In  the  one  quality  as  well  as  the  other  he 
was  represented  at  the  same  time  as  sovereign  of 
heaven  and  the  earth  impregnated  by  him.  The 
Canaanite  Moloch  was  not  essentially  different  from 
Baal,  but  the  same  God  in  his  terrible  and  destroy 
ing  aspects,  the  god  of  consuming  fire,  the  burning 
sun  who  smote  the  land  with  unfruitfulness  and 
pestilence,  dries  up  the  springs  and  begets  poison 
ous  winds.  When  the  Prophet  Jeremiah  (xxxii.  35) 
says  such  as  in  the  Valley  of  Ben  Hinnom  built 
high  places  to  Baal  to  lead  their  sons  and  daughters 
through  the  fire  of  Moloch,  and  again,  the  Jews 
had  built  high  places  to  Baal  to  burn  their  children 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC        173 

by  fire  as  a  burnt-offering  to  Baal  (Jer.  xix.  5), 
there  is  no  mistaking  the  essential  identity  of  the  two. 
Besides  the  incense  consumed  in  his  honour  bulls 
also  were  sacrificed  to  Baal,  and  probably  horses  too. 
The  Persians  at  least  sacrificed  the  latter  to  the  sun 
god.  But  the  principal  sacrifice  was  children.  This 
horrible  custom  was  grounded,  in  part,  on  the  notion 
that  children  were  the  dearest  possession  of  parents, 
and  part,  that  as  pure  and  innocent  beings,  they 
were  the  offerings  of  atonement  most  likely  to 
assuage  the  anger  of  the  deity,  and  again,  that  the 
god  of  whose  essence  the  generative  powers  of 
nations  was,  had  a  just  right  to  that  which  was 
begotten  of  man,  and  to  the  surrender  of  the  lives 
of  his  children.  The  sacrifices  were  consumed  by 
fire,  for  the  life  given  by  the  fire  god  he  should  also 
take  back  by  the  flames  which  destroy  life.  The 
Rabbinical  description  of  the  image  of  Moloch,  that 
it  was  a  human  figure  with  a  bull's  head  and  out 
stretched  arms,  is  confirmed  by  Diodorus  in  the 
account  which  he  gives  of  the  Carthaginian  Kronos 
or  Moloch.  The  image  of  metal  was  made  hot  by 
a  fire  kindled  within  it  and  the  children  placed  in 
its  arms,  rolled  from  thence  into  the  lap  below. 
Voluntary  offerings  on  the  part  of  parents  were 
essential  to  the  success  of  the  sacrifice,  even  the 
first-born,  nay,  even  the  only  child  of  the  family 
was  given  up.  The  parents  stopping  the  cries  of 
the  children  by  fondling  and  kissing  them,  for  the 
victim  ought  not  to  weep,  and  the  sound  of  com 
plaint  was  drowned  by  the  din  of  flutes  and  drums ; 
mothers,  according  to  Plutarch,  stood  by  without 
tears  or  sobs,  for  if  they  wept  or  sobbed  they  lost 
the  honour  of  the  act  thereby,  and  the  children, 
notwithstanding,  were  sacrificed.  Such  sacrifices 


174     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

took  place  either  annually  or  on  an  appointed  day, 
or  before  great  enterprises,  or  on  the  occasion  of 
public  calamities  to  appease  the  wrath  of  the  gods. 

"  Another  form  of  Baal  was  Melkarth,  the  city 
king,  tutelary  god  of  the  city  of  Tyre,  whose  worship 
was  carried  far  and  wide  by  the  colonies  proceeding 
from  the  shores  of  the  Mediterranean.  This  pro 
tector  of  Tyre  was  the  Phoenician  Hercules  to  whom 
we  have  before  referred,  and  as  god  alike  of  sun 
and  fire  a  perpetual  fire  was  kept  on  his  altars ;  he 
was  a  race  king  and  hero  of  the  people's  expeditions. 

"  In  the  Astarte  of  the  Western  Asiatics  we  recog 
nise  that  great  Nature  Goddess  standing  by  Baal's 
side,  regent  of  the  stars,  queen  of  heaven,  and 
goddess  of  the  moon,  the  mother  of  life  and  goddess 
of  women's  fecundity.  Under  the  name  of  Astarte 
she  was  guardian  goddess  of  Sidon  and  not  essen 
tially  different  from  Baaltis  of  Byblus  and  Urania 
of  Askalon.  The  Greeks  and  Romans  sometimes 
took  her  for  Juno,  as  she  was  the  supreme  divinity 
of  the  Asiatics,  sometimes  for  Apaphrodite  on  ac 
count  of  the  licentious  character  of  the  worship  sacred 
to  her.  Her  statue  rode  next  to  that  of  Baal  in 
a  chariot  drawn  by  lions,  a  precious  stone  placed  on 
her  head  illuminating  the  temple  at  night.  She  was 
considered  one  with  Derceto,  who  was  honoured  under 
the  form  of  a  fish  on  the  Phoenician  coasts,  a  com 
bined  worship  being  offered  to  the  goddess  and  Baal. 

"  In  the  court  of  the  temple  at  Aplieka  there  were 
sacred  beasts  in  a  tame  state  in  great  numbers  and 
also  a  pond  containing  holy  fish,  and  priests  and 
temple  ministers  were  present  in  such  numbers  that 
Lucien  counted  above  three  hundred  employed  in 
one  sacrifice,  but  beside  these  were  a  number  of  flute 
players,  Galli  and  women  frenzied  with  inspiration. 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC        175 

At  the  spring  festival,  called  by  some  the  '  Brand 
Feast/  by  others  the  '  Feast  of  Torches/  which 
was  attended  by  streams  of  visitors  from  every 
country,  huge  trees  were  burned  with  their  offerings 
suspended  on  them.  Even  children  were  sacrificed  ; 
they  were  put  into  a  leathern  bag  and  thrown  down 
the  whole  height  of  the  temple  to  the  bottom  with 
the  shocking  expression  that  they  were  not  children 
but  calves.  In  the  foreground  of  the  temple  were 
two  gigantic  Phalli,  and  to  the  exciting  din  of 
drums,  flutes,  and  inspired  songs  the  Galli  cut 
themselves  on  the  arms,  and  the  effect  of  this  act 
and  the  music  accompanying  it  was  so  strong  upon 
mere  spectators  that  all  their  bodily  and  mental 
powers  were  thrown  into  a  tumult  of  excitement, 
and  they,  too,  seized  by  a  desire  to  lacerate  them 
selves,  inflicted  wounds  upon  their  bodies  by  means 
of  potsherds  lying  ready  for  the  purpose.  There 
upon  they  ran  through  the  city  bleeding  and  received 
from  the  inhabitants  a  woman's  attire.  Not  chas 
tity  but  barrenness  was  intended  by  this  act,  whereby 
the  Galli  only  desired  to  be  like  the  goddess.  The 
relation  which  they  henceforth  occupied  towards 
women  was  regarded  as  a  holy  thing  and  was 
generally  tolerated/' 

Under  the  Jewish  kings  Ahaziah  and  Jeroboam 
and  under  Athaliah,  the  daughter  of  Jezebel,  it  was 
for  a  period  the  state  religion  of  Judah,  and  from  the 
proselytising  efforts  of  these  two  queens  and  the  re 
lentless  persecution  which  followed,  the  downfall  of 
Israel  and  Judah,  which  culminated  in  the  captivity, 
is  distinctly  attributed  by  the  Hebrew  historians 
(2  Kings  xvii.  16). 

The  temple  dedicated  to  Melcarth  or  Hercules, 
it  may  be  mentioned,  had  this  marked  peculiarity 


176    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

that,  according  to  the  best  authorities,  they  were 
without  images,  no  women,  dogs,  or  swine  being 
permitted  to  enter  them  under  penalty  of  death. 

Such  was  the  religious  system  of  Phoenicia, 
which  after  the  lapse  of  two  thousand  eight  hundred 
years  is  found  faithfully  reproduced  in  the  Pacific. 
The  picture  which  Dr.  George  Turner  and  Mr. 
William  Ellis  print  of  the  religious  traditions  and 
practices  of  the  Samoan  and  Society  Islands  is 
clearly  Phoenician. 

Mr.  Ellis  says  :  "  They  supposed  in  Tahiti  that  the 
gods  were  powerful  spiritual  beings  in  some  degree 
acquainted  with  the  affairs  of  the  world  and  gener 
ally  governing  them,  yet  never  exercising  anything 
like  benevolence  towards  even  their  most  devoted 
followers,  but  requiring  homage  and  obedience  with 
constant  offerings,  denouncing  their  anger  and  dis 
pensing  destruction  on  all  who  either  refused  or 
hesitated  to  comply.  But  while  the  people  supposed 
them  to  be  spiritual  beings  they  manufactured 
images  either  as  the  representatives  of  their  form 
and  emblem  of  their  character,  or  as  vehicles  or 
instruments  through  which  their  communications 
might  be  made  to  the  God  and  his  will  revealed  to 
them. 

"  Their  idols  were  either  rough  unpolished  logs  of 
the  Aito  or  Casuarina  tree,  wrapped  in  numerous 
folds  of  sacred  cloth,  rudely  carved  images  or  shape 
less  pieces  covered  with  curiously-netted  cenct  of 
finely-braided  cocoanut  husk  and  ornamented  with 
feathers.  These  varied  in  size,  being  six  or  eight  feet 
long,  others  not  more  than  as  many  inches.  These 
were  representatives  of  the  Tiis.  Into  these  they 
supposed  the  gods  entered  at  certain  times  or  seasons, 
or  in  answer  to  the  prayers  of  the  priest.  During 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC        177 

the  indwelling  of  the  gods  they  supposed  that  even 
the  images  were  very  powerful,  but  when  the  spirits 
had  departed,  though  they  still  remained  among 
their  most  sacred  things,  their  extraordinary  power 
had  disappeared. 

'  Their  maraes  or  places  of  worship  were  open 
places — a  sort  of  arena  in  the  form  of  a  parallelo 
gram  formed  by  a  stone  wall  4  to  6  feet  high, 
and  terminating  at  one  end  of  the  extremities  in  an 
immense  mass  of  stones  of  pyramidal  form,  less  long 
than  broad.  The  inside  of  these  singular  enclosures 
was  usually  large  enough  to  contain  some  small 
buildings  to  house  the  images  and  lodge  the  priests 
and  guardians.  In  some  of  the  maraes  the  pyramid 
that  ended  the  enclosure  was  not  less  than  300  feet 
long  and  100  feet  broad  at  the  base,  and  60  feet  high, 
but  diminishing  gradually  from  the  base  to  the 
summit. 

"  Ruins  of  such  temples  are  found  in  every  situa 
tion  ;  on  the  summit  of  the  hills  at  Maeva,  where 
Tanes  Temple,  nearly  120  feet  square,  enclosed  with 
high  walls  is  still  standing,  almost  entirely  on  the 
extremity  of  a  point  of  land  projecting  into  the  sea, 
or,  in  the  recesses  of  an  extensive  and  overhanging 
grove.  The  trees  growing  within  the  walls  were  con 
sidered  sacred,  and  the  interwoven  and  umbrageous 
branches  frequently  excluded  the  rays  of  the  sun 
so  that  the  contrast  between  the  bright  glare  of  a 
tropical  day  and  the  sombre  gloom  in  the  depths 
of  these  groves  was  peculiarly  striking.  The  fan 
tastical  contortions  of  the  trunks  and  tortuous 
branches  of  the  aged  trees,  the  plaintive  and  moan 
ing  sound  of  the  wind  passing  through  the  leaves 
of  the  casuarina  trees  often  resembled  the  wild  notes 
of  an  aeolian  harp,  and  the  dark  walls  of  the  temple 

M 


178    THE    PHOENICIANS   AND   AMERICA 

with  the  grotesque  and  horrific  appearance  of  the 
idols  combined  to  inspire  extraordinary  emotions 
of  superstitious  terror,  and  nurture  that  deep  feeling 
of  dread  which  characterised  the  worship  of  Tahiti's 
sanguinary  deities. 

"  The  trees  with  which  they  surrounded  these 
maraes  were  the  Tomam  and  the  Aito  or  Casuarina, 
the  leaves  of  which  moved  by  the  wind  produced  a 
whistling  moan  which  they  attributed  to  the  gods. 
These  trees,  like  everything  else  within  the  enclosure 
indicated  by  the  trees,  were  sacred,  and  the  fruit 
could  only  be  gathered  and  eaten  by  the  priests. 
There  was  seldom  any  habitation  in  the  neighbour 
hood,  and,  except  on  feast  days  and  religious 
ceremonies,  there  always  reigned  a  solemn  silence 
that  could  not  be  broken  even  by  the  guardians 
and  priests  who  lived  within  the  enclosure.  No 
body  entered  there  no  matter  what  the  necessity, 
and  all  kept  the  most  religious  silence  when  passing 
near  by,  uncovering  the  body  to  the  girdle  a  long 
time  before  reaching  it.  Women  could  not  enter  the 
maraes,  and  that  upon  pain  of  death,  for  the  least 
contact  defiled  the  holiness  of  the  place. 

"  The  priests  of  the  national  temples  were  a  dis 
tinct  class,  the  office  of  the  priesthood  being  heredi 
tary  in  all  departments.  In  the  family,  according  to 
the  patriarchal  usage,  the  father  was  the  priest, 
and  in  the  village  or  district  the  family  of  the  priest 
was  sacred,  and  his  office  was  held  by  one  who  was 
also  a  chief.  The  king  was  sometimes  priest  of  the 
nation,  and  the  highest  sacerdotal  dignity  was  often 
possessed  by  a  member  of  the  reigning  family. 

"Animals,  fruits,  &c.,  were  not  the  only  articles 
offered  to  the  idols ;  the  most  affecting  part  of  the 
sacrifice  was  the  frequent  immolation  of  human 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC        179 

victims,  which  in  the  technical  language  of  the  priests 
were  called  fish.  They  were  offered  in  seasons  of 
war,  at  great  national  festivals,  during  the  illness  of 
rulers,  and  on  the  erection  of  temples.  I  have  been 
informed  by  several  of  the  inhabitants  of  Maeva  that 
the  foundation  of  some  of  the  temples  for  the  abode  of 
the  gods  were  actually  laid  in  human  sacrifices. 

"  The  only  motives  by  which  they  were  influenced 
in  their  religious  homage  on  service  were,  with  few 
exceptions,  superstitious  fear,  revenge  toward  their 
enemies,  a  desire  to  avert  the  dreadful  consequences 
of  the  anger  of  the  gods,  and  secure  their  sanction 
and  aid  in  the  commission  of  the  grossest  crimes. 
Their  worship  consisted  in  proffering  prayers,  pre 
senting  offerings,  and  sacrificing  victims.  Their 
ubus  or  prayers,  though  occasionally  brief,  were 
often  exceedingly  long  and  protracted,  containing 
many  repetitions,  and  appearing  as  if  the  suppliant 
thought  that  he  should  be  heard  for  his  much 
speaking  "  (i  Kings  xviii.  26). 

Of  the  Areois  Society,  which,  as  we  shall  see  as 
we  proceed,  must  unquestionably  be  identified  with 
the  Galli  or  priests  of  Astarte,  Mr.  Ellis  has  been 
compelled  to  write  with  great  reservation.  The 
whole  subject  is  indeed  so  repulsive  that  it  would 
under  ordinary  circumstances  have  been  desirable 
to  have  avoided  all  reference  to  it.  The  presence 
of  the  Phoenician  in  the  Pacific  and  on  the  Pacific 
slopes  of  the  American  Continent  can,  however,  be  so 
easily  recognised  by  traces  of  the  presence  of  the 
strange  cult  in  the  two  extremes  of  the  Phoenician 
sphere  of  influence  that  it  is  highly  advisable  to 
hear  what  Mr.  Ellis  has  to  say  on  the  subject. 

"  The  Gods  which  presided  over  the  two  divi 
sions  of  the  Areois  Society/'  says  he,  "  were  monsters 


180    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

of  vice,  and  of  course  patronised  every  evil  practice 
perpetrated  during  the  season  of  public  festivity. 
Many  of  the  regulations  of  the  society  cannot  be 
made  public  without  doing  violence  to  every  feeling 
of  propriety,  but  so  far  as  it  can  consistently  be  done 
it  seems  to  be  desirable  to  give  some  particulars. 

"  The  two  brother  deities  who  were  the  pro 
genitors  of  the  society,  the  Kings  of  the  Areois,  lived 
in  celibacy  and  consequently  had  no  descendants. 
On  this  account,  although  they  did  not  enjoin 
celibacy  on  their  followers,  they  prohibited  their 
having  children.  Hence  one  of  the  standing  re 
gulations  of  the  institution  was  the  murder  of 
children.  On  the  initiation  of  the  candidate  he  was 
commanded  to  seize  the  cloth  garment  worn  by  the  chief 
woman  present  and  by  this  act  he  became  a  member  oj 
the  seventh  class. 

"  Amusement  was  not  the  only  purpose  for  which 
these  assemblies  were  convened.  They  included  all 
monstrous  and  prodigious  things,  as  well  as  those 
that  were  abominable,  unutterable.  In  some  of  their 
meetings  they  seem  to  have  placed  the  imagination 
on  the  rack  to  discover  the  worst  pollutions  of  which 
it  was  possible  for  man  to  be  guilty,  and  to  have 
striven  to  outdo  each  other  in  the  most  revolting 
practices.  The  mystery  of  iniquity  and  acts  of 
more  than  bestial  degradation  to  which  they  were 
at  times  addicted  must  remain  in  the  darkness 
to  which  even  they  sometimes  feel  it  expedient  to 
consign  them. 

"  The  Areois  were  esteemed  by  the  people  as  a 
superior  order  of  beings  closely  allied  to  the  gods 
and  deriving  from  them  sanction  for  their  abomi 
nations  and  their  heartless  murders.  Their  life  was 
a  life  of  luxurious  ease  and  lascivious  indulgence 


PHOENICIANS    IN    THE    PACIFIC        181 

and  crime,  and  for  them,  it  was  believed,  was  re 
served  that  Elysium  which  their  mythology  taught 
them  to  believe  was  reserved  for  those  pre-eminently 
favoured  by  the  gods." 

Any  comment  on  this  somewhat  bare  outline  of 
the  Tahitian  religious  cult  is  clearly  unnecessary, 
for  the  source  from  which  it  was  derived  is  stamped 
indelibly  across  its  entire  face.  Even  after  the  lapse 
of  three  thousand  years  there  is  not  in  the  history 
of  mankind  another  religious  system  to  which  its 
origin  could  in  reason  be  assigned.  Phoenicia  is  so 
plainly  depicted  that  he  who  runs  may  read.  We 
have  therefore  in  our  possession  one  means  effec 
tive  beyond  all  others  of  determining  the  route 
followed  by  the  joint  fleets  of  Hiram  and  Solomon 
on  their  voyages  to  Ophir. 


CHAPTER   VIII 

THE   PROBLEM   OF  THE   AZTEC 

Problem  of  the  unity  of  the  human  race — How  related  to  the  Biblical 
account  of  the  Creation — Ancient  civilisation  of  Central  and  South 
America — Problems  which  it  suggests — Did  the  fleet  of  Solomon 
and  Hiram  discover  America  ? — Asiatic  origin  of  the  first  American 
population — Was  the  Ophir  of  Solomon  and  Hiram's  fleet  the  Pacific 
slopes  of  the  American  Continent? — Testimony  of  native  records  of 
Mexico  and  Central  America — Humboldt's  opinion — What  may  be 
learnt  from  the  constitution  and  structure  of  the  native  society  of 
Central  America. 

THE  problem  of  the  unity  of  the  human  race  still 
awaits  solution  by  the  anthropologist.  So  far  the 
preponderance  of  argument  has  been  on  the  side  of 
those  who  represent  the  theory  of  various  centres 
of  creation.  Those,  however,  who  uphold  the 
Biblical  account  of  creation  have  by  no  means  ex 
hausted  the  arguments  available  for  the  establish 
ment  of  their  belief,  for  with  a  more  intimate  know 
ledge  of  the  various  forms  of  uncivilised  and  civil 
ised  life  existing  on  the  American  Continent  when 
it  was  first  discovered  by  the  Spaniards,  it  becomes 
increasingly  apparent  that  the  solution  of  the  enigma 
is  by  no  means  so  hopeless  as  has  been  generally 
supposed. 

The  advocates  of  the  Biblical  account  of  creation 
have  been  regarded  by  advanced  anthropologists  as 
labouring  under  a  somewhat  serious  disadvantage 
in  consequence  of  the  fact  that  orthodoxy  has 

always  taught  that  mankind  has  only  existed  on 

182 


THE    PROBLEM    OF   THE    AZTEC      183 

the  earth  for  the  short  period  of  six  thousand  years 
— a  period  which  seems  much  too  short  for  the 
evolution  of  man. 

Great  care  must,  however,  be  exercised  in  in 
terpreting  the  Biblical  account  of  creation.  The 
Scripture  narratives  nowhere  teach  that  man  at  the 
beginning  issued  from  the  hands  of  his  Maker  in 
what  has  been  described  by  the  opposing  school  of 
anthropology  in  a  primitive  or  aboriginal  condition. 
On  the  contrary,  they  indicate  that  he  was  created 
in  a  perfect,  though  not  fully  unfolded,  condition, 
in  which  there  was  a  complete  dovetailing  of  the 
spiritual  and  mental  faculties  which  made  communi 
cation  between  himself  and  the  lower  forms  of 
creation  possible  (Gen.  ii.  19,  and  iii.  i),  and  be 
tween  himself  and  his  Creator  not  only  possible  but, 
to  some  extent  at  least,  habitual  (Gen.  ii.  16,  and 
iii.  8).  Furthermore,  that  his  endowment  was  not 
wholly  confined  to  the  first  generation  of  men  (Gen. 
iv.  6),  but,  to  some  extent,  was  possessed  by  suc 
ceeding  generations  (Exod.  xxxiii.  ii ;  i  Sam.  x.  2 ; 
i  Kings  xvii.  2 ;  Isa.  vi.  i  ;  Zee.  ii.  5 ;  John  i.  6 ; 
Acts  vii.  2  and  xix.  27  ;  Rev.  i.  12). 

If,  therefore,  we  adopt  this  view  of  Scriptural 
teaching  on  the  subject  and  admit  that  the  fall  of 
mankind  consisted  in  a  rupture,  more  or  less  com 
plete,  of  the  dovetailing  of  the  spiritual  and  mental 
faculties  as  explicitly  set  forth  in  such  passages  as 
those  of  Ezekiel  xii.  2  and  Matthew  xiii.  14,  then 
we  shall  better  understand  what  is  meant  by  the 
unity  of  the  human  race.  As  heirs  to  the  deterio 
rated  physical  attributes  which  for  so  many  genera 
tions  have  dominated  the  career  of  humanity,  it  is 
inevitable  that  we  should  become  less  and  less  the 
possessors  of  that  glorious  endowment  which  was 


184    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

the  crown  and  glory  of  the  human  race  at  the  be 
ginning.  If  the  Scriptures  teach  anything  concern 
ing  the  fall  of  man  it  is  this,  for  sin,  or  the  Saxon 
root  from  which  the  word  was  obtained,  zin,  in  its 
last  analysis,  means  deficiency.  That  is  to  say,  the 
Scriptures  teach  that  in  consequence  of  the  Fall 
through  unrighteousness  and  the  tendency  towards 
this  deficient  condition,  men  had  lost  and  were  con 
tinuing  to  lose  faculty,  and  that  as  generations  were 
being  swept  down  the  stream  of  time  they  were 
drifting  ever  farther  from  this  first  sublime  state 
until,  after  four  thousand  years,  the  movement  had 
acquired  so  much  momentum  that  the  divine  in 
tervention  became  absolutely  necessary  to  the  sal 
vation  of  the  human  race.  It  is  indeed  impossible 
to  arrive  at  any  intelligent  understanding  of  the 
Scriptural  doctrines  of  the  Fall  and  the  Redemption 
of  mankind,  or  of  the  retention  and  use  of  the 
supernormal  faculties  by  some  nations  for  a  longer 
period  than  others,  as  was  clearly  the  case  among 
the  Hebrews,  and  probably,  as  we  will  show  by 
quotation  from  the  prophet  Ezekiel,  among  the 
Phoenicians,  unless  we  take  this  view  of  the  case. 

Once  we  admit  the  doctrine  of  the  transgression 
of  all  of  the  progenitors  of  mankind  from  the  high 
estate  in  which  they  were  created  and  the  demoral 
ising  effects  of  unrighteousness  on  succeeding  genera 
tions,  the  story  of  the  ancient  civilisations  of  Central 
and  Southern  America  become  at  once  an  impressive 
object  lesson  with  respect  to  the  state  of  human 
society  and  the  fate  that  confronted  mankind  at 
the  beginning  of  the  Christian  era.  At  the  same 
time  it  provides  a  working  basis  for  our  investi 
gation,  since  it  enables  us  to  conceive  of  a  time 
when  a  portion  of  the  human  race  were  in  possession 


THE    PROBLEM    OF   THE    AZTEC      185 

of  faculties  that  were  more  legitimately  developed 
and  admirably  adapted  to  the  exigencies  of  the  period 
in  which  they  were  exercised.  This  point  is  strik 
ingly  emphasized  by  Professor  Heeren  in  his  Asiatic 
Research  (p.  34).  He  says  :  "  We  should  not  there 
fore  doubt  of  what  appears  to  us  extraordinary, 
because,  judging  from  our  own  experience,  it  does 
not  seem  probable,  for  this  does  not  enable  us  to 
decide  what  may  have  been  possible  under  another 
clime  and  other  circumstances,  for  do  not  the  Pyra 
mids  of  Egypt,  the  wall  of  China,  and  the  rock  temple 
of  Elephantis  stand  out  as  it  were  in  mockery  of 
that  criticism  that  would  arrogate  to  itself  the 
privilege  of  fixing  boundaries  to  the  capabilities  of 
congregated  nations." 

Professor  Heeren's  view  is  supported  by  the 
history  of  the  entire  civilised  portion  of  the  human 
race.  Those  who  have  cast  aside  the  seductions  of 
unrighteousness  and  placed  themselves  wittingly 
or  unwittingly  in  alignment  with  the  written  or  un 
written  law  of  righteousness  have  thereby  attained 
to  a  breadth  of  knowledge  and  a  success  in  handling 
the  spiritual  and  material  forces  of  nature  that  have 
arrested  the  attention  of  all  succeeding  generations. 
As  nearly  three  thousand  years  have  elapsed  since 
the  expeditions  sent  by  Solomon  and  Hiram  from 
Eziongeber  on  the  Red  Sea  that  led  to  the  dis 
covery  and  occupancy  of  America,  it  is  well  not  to 
expect  too  much  in  the  way  of  absolute  correspond 
ence  between  the  institutions  of  the  Mediterranean 
basin  a  thousand  years  before  the  Christian  era  and 
those  existing  on  the  American  Continent  in  A.D. 
1500,  when  the  arrival  of  the  Spaniards  opened  the 
way  to  a  scientific  examination  of  the  problem  as 
to  the  source  from  which  the  population  composed 


i86    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

of  uncivilised  and  civilised  races  inhabiting  the  New 
World  had  been  derived.  During  the  long  period 
of  isolation,  changes  in  the  state  and  constitution  of 
society  that  have  probably  no  exact  counterpart  in 
human  history  must  have  taken  place. 

Nor  must  we  be  surprised  if  we  find  that  the 
hybrid  civilisation  that  blossomed  from  this  strange 
admixture  of  races  confronts  us  with  problems  of 
the  most  perplexing  character.  In  this  new  terri 
tory,  when  the  original  purposes  of  the  expeditions 
had  been  accomplished,  the  different  races — Jew, 
Phoenician,  Scythian,  and  Thracian — by  habits  of 
thought  and  speech  would  in  large  measure  segregate 
themselves  and  occupy  territory  where  each  race, 
without  let  or  hindrance,  would  live  over  again 
its  own  national  life  in  surroundings  congenial  to 
its  antecedents.  There  would,  however,  remain  a 
strong  residue  of  each  which,  attracted  by  a  com 
mercial  career,  would  unify  around  a  common  centre. 
Now  this  was  exactly  the  condition  of  affairs  that 
confronted  mankind  when  the  American  Continent 
was  rediscovered  by  Europeans  in  the  fifteenth 
century  of  our  era.  The  religious,  scientific,  artistic, 
civil,  commercial,  and  manufacturing  state  of  the 
civilised  communities  could  then  easily,  despite  the 
long  period  of  isolation,  be  related  to  an  Eastern 
Mediterranean  basin  origin.  The  religious  and 
material  influence  dominating  the  region  was  mainly 
Phoenician,  while  the  moral  influence  was  unmis 
takably  Jewish. 

Much  surprise  has  been  expressed  that  ancient 
history  should  have  provided  so  little  information 
with  regard  to  the  course  pursued  by  the  ships  of 
Hiram  and  Solomon,  likewise  their  destination,  but 
when  we  consider  the  state  of  society  at  that  period, 


THE    PROBLEM    OF    THE    AZTEC      187 

the  limited  means  for  the  communication  of  infor 
mation,  and  the  jealous  care  that  was  exercised  in 
preserving  intact  knowledge  of  this  very  nature 
from  the  rest  of  mankind,  this  is  scarcely  to  be 
wondered  at.  Nevertheless,  the  references  of  Plato, 
Seneca,  and  Aristotle  to  the  existence  of  a  continent 
hid  in  the  western  ocean  makes  it  clear  that  the 
knowledge  of  the  discovery  of  America  by  the  Jews 
and  Phoenicians  was  not  confined  to  the  leaders  of 
these  nations.  Indeed  we  are  forced  to  conclude 
that  as  history  makes  no  reference  to  any  other  ex 
peditions  either  of  a  national  or  an  international 
character  setting  out  from  the  Mediterranean  ports 
for  very  many  centuries  after  this  date  that  the  re 
ferences  of  these  classical  authors  must  be  under 
stood  as  an  echo  reaching  Greece  from  Thracian, 
Scythian,  Phoenician,  or  Jewish  sources  of  the  dis 
covery  of  America  by  the  fleets  of  Solomon  and 
Hiram. 

But  while  we  have  no  knowledge  of  any  Medi 
terranean  expeditions  to  the  American  Continent 
prior  to  the  voyages  of  Columbus  that  are  worthy 
of  serious  consideration,  we  are  none  the  less  con 
fronted  by  a  statement  in  the  Votanic  tradition  of 
so  extraordinary  a  character  as  to  make  it  clear 
that  these  early  voyagers  were  in  possession  of  suffi 
cient  astronomical  and  geographical  knowledge  to 
warrant  them  in  believing  that  a  journey  thither 
from  the  western  seas  was  not  only  possible,  but  one 
which  it  was  their  intention  should  be  undertaken 
at  a  later  date.  Votan,  the  first  culture  hero,  on 
reaching  the  Atlantic  coasts,  where  he  erected  his 
first  city  of  Nachan  or  Palenque,  is  reported  to  have 
prophesied  "  that  in  a  future  age  his  brethren,  white 
men  and  bearded  like  himself,  would  arrive  on 


i88    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

these  shores  from  the  land  where  the  sun  rises  and 
come  to  rule  the  country/'  Whether  we  may, 
from  his  statement  in  the  Votanic  tradition,  under 
stand  that  the  sphericity  of  the  earth  was  known  to 
the  Phoenicians,  who  will  undertake  to  say  ? 

Humboldt  (ii.  68),  writing  on  the  subject  of  the 
populating  of  the  American  Continent,  says  :  "It 
appears  most  evident  to  me  that  the  monuments, 
methods  of  computing  time,  systems  of  cosmo 
gony,  and  many  myths  of  America,  offer  striking 
analogies  which  indicate  an  ancient  communication 
and  are  not  simply  the  result  of  that  uniform  con 
dition  in  which  all  nations  are  found  in  the  dawn  of 
civilisation/'  an  opinion  that  is  abundantly  sup 
ported  by  the  results  of  our  research.  For  as  easier 
means  of  communication  are  sweeping  the  outlying 
and  hitherto  less  accessible  portions  of  the  world 
into  active  contact  with  the  great  centres  of  popu 
lation  and  culture,  it  becomes  increasingly  apparent 
that  the  unity  of  the  human  race  is  the  one  great 
law  dominating  the  history  of  humanity,  and  that 
any  seeming  infractions  of  this  law  have  simply  been 
caused  by  our  ignorance  of  the  forces  that  have  been 
operating  in  the  distribution  of  mankind. 

The  belief  that  America  received  its  first  popu 
lation  from  Asia  has  long  been  held  by  reputable 
scientists,  and  is  based  on  a  logical  foundation.  If 
we  discard  the  autochthonic  theory  of  origin,  it  is 
certainly  to  Asia,  the  reputed  cradle  of  the  human 
race,  that  we  must  first  look  for  proof  of  the  migra 
tion  of  races  that  would  account  for  the  peopling 
of  these  distant  regions.  Till  now  there  has  been  a 
consensus  of  opinion  among  those  who  have  most 
carefully  studied  the  subject  that  the  first  settle 
ment  of  the  American  Continent  is  a  problem  which 


THE    PROBLEM    OF    THE    AZTEC       189 

can  never  be  solved,  an  opinion  that,  in  some 
limited  measure,  is  likely  to  prevail  to  the  end  of 
time  so  far  at  least  as  this  inquiry  may  effect  the 
so-called  indigenous  races  of  the  extreme  north 
west  territories.  So  little  is  known  of  the  move 
ments  of  the  population  which  ultimately  occupied 
the  extreme  limits  of  the  Asiatic  continent  to  the 
north  and  adjacent  to  the  Alaskan  boundaries  that 
we  have  no  satisfactory  working  basis  for  an  in 
duction  leading  to  a  solution  of  the  problem. 

When,  however,  we  come  to  a  consideration  of  the 
civilised  races  of  Central  America  and  the  popula 
tions  that  have  sprung  from  them  we  are  on  much 
surer  ground.  In  an  artificial  state  of  society  types 
are  produced  that  are  easy  of  recognition  when 
found  in  territories  far  remote  from  those  in  which 
the  peculiar  conditions  evolving  these  types  existed. 
Now  the  results  of  later  research,  when  placed  pari 
passu  with  certain  well-ascertained  movements  in 
Asia  and  Europe,  make  it  clear  that  the  early  trend 
of  exploration,  population,  and  commerce  was  not, 
as  is  generally  supposed,  mainly  westward,  but, 
radiating  from  a  common  centre  in  Babylonia,  was 
as  aggressively  active  in  other  directions,  especially 
to  the  East,  where  the  great  centres  of  population  are 
still  to  be  found. 

It  is  not,  however,  with  these  movements  that 
we  are  at  present  concerned,  but  with  those  that 
took  place  in  the  south  and  south-east  and  resulted 
in  the  occupancy  of  the  Indian  and  Arabian 
peninsulas.  The  exploration  of  the  territory  that 
lay  to  the  farther  East  depended  wholly  on  the 
Phoenicians,  who  were  a  navigating  people.  Un 
fortunately,  direct  testimony  with  regard  both  to 
the  direction  and  extent  of  their  activities  in  this 


igo    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

region  is  most  fragmentary.  But  it  sufficiently 
confirms  the  testimony  of  the  Hebrew  historians 
that  the  efforts  of  the  Phoenicians  were  by  no  means 
so  entirely  directed  towards  the  development  of  the 
western  trade  as  has  generally  been  supposed.  In 
consequence  of  information  supplied  by  exploring 
parties  sent  out  from  the  Persian  Gulf  settlements, 
Phoenicia  and  the  neighbouring  kingdom  of  Israel, 
or  at  least  the  rulers  of  these  adjacent  territories, 
who  were  at  that  time  intimately  associated  in  great 
public  works  of  mutual  advantage,  determined  to 
fit  out  some  expeditions  with  a  view  to  the  joint 
occupancy  and  exploitation  of  the  territory. 

The  finding,  therefore,  of  a  people  on  the  western 
shores  of  America  who  claimed  to  have  emigrated 
from  the  Asiatic  coasts  need  not,  owing  to  the  sup 
posed  difficulty  of  navigating  the  Pacific,  occasion 
surprise.  The  people  who  made  this  claim  were  not 
rude  tribes  but  settled  nations  in  possession  of  a 
highly  organised  civilisation  with  an  Eastern  Medi 
terranean  origin.  In  view  of  all  this,  the  question 
may  well  be  asked  if  we  have  not  at  last  found  the 
clue  to  the  destination  of  the  joint  fleets  of  Solomon 
and  Hiram,  Ophir,  or,  as  it  is  sometimes  called, 
Tharshish.  Was  it  not  the  voyage  to  this  region 
and  return,  which  occupied  three  years  ?  Was 
this  not  the  unknown  region  from  which  silver  was 
brought  in  such  abundance  as  to  glut  the  markets 
of  Palestine  ? 

A  careful  examination  of  the  civilisation  of  this 
region  clearly  shows  that  it  cannot  be  regarded 
as  indigenous.  Humboldt  says  in  his  Venes  de 
Cordillons,  when  comparing  the  Mexican  calendar 
with  that  found  in  use  among  the  Thibetans,  Mongols, 
and  Chinese,  that  "  all  of  them  had  their  apparent 


THE    PROBLEM    OF   THE    AZTEC      191 

origin  in  the  ordinary  Babylonian  Zodiac,  from  which 
was  drawn  that  with  which  we  are  familiar  in  its 
Greek  form." 

Again  the  civil  year  of  the  civilised  nations  of 
the  Pacific  slopes  of  the  American  Continent  was 
made  up  of  365  days,  divided  into  eighteen  months 
of  twenty  days  each  and  five  supplementary  or 
intercalary  days,  each  day  of  the  month  having  a 
distinct  name.  This,  Humboldt  gives  strong  leasons 
for  believing,  was  derived  from  the  same  source  as 
the  Zodiac,  which  was  made  use  of  from  the  re 
motest  antiquity  in  India  and  Thibet.  A  calendar 
that  moreover  equalled,  if  it  did  not  surpass  in 
accuracy,  the  systems  in  use  among  contempor 
aneous  nations  in  Asia  and  Europe  when  America 
was  discovered  by  Columbus,  points  clearly  to  an 
early  communication  between  the  two  continents 
of  which  history  has  apparently  failed  to  preserve 
any  definite  record. 

Confronted  as  we  are  by  perplexities  of  this 
nature,  it  is  extremely  fortunate  that  we  find  the 
native  records  of  Mexico  and  Central  America 
entitled  to  much  more  respect  than  can  be  accorded 
to  the  traditional  lore  of  the  general  run  of  abo 
riginal  tribes  in  other  portions  of  the  world.  This 
native  literature,  in  the  opinion  of  Humboldt  and 
others,  is  wonderfully  reliable,  for  it  was  the  work 
of  native  historians  appointed  by  the  various 
governments  who  were  accustomed  to  punish  with 
rigorous  severity  all  attempts  at  falsification.  Here 
we  find  the  names  of  persons  and  places  and  the 
dates  of  events  which  enable  us  to  trace  not  only 
the  basic  facts  in  connection  with  this  imported 
civilisation,  but  the  course  of  events  from  generation 
to  generation. 


192    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

The  best  account  that  we  possess  of  these  native 
records  is  that  given  by  the  Abbe  Brasseur  de 
Bourbourg,  whose  familiarity  with  the  Nahua  and 
Central  American  languages  and  his  indefatigable 
industry  and  erudition  pre-eminently  qualify  him 
for  the  task  of  unravelling  the  mysteries  of  American 
primitive  history.  According  to  these  records  (Ency. 
Brit.,  vol.  i.  704)  Votan,  the  first  of  the  American 
culture  heroes,  and  his  companions  arrived  on  the 
Pacific  coasts  of  the  continent  in  seven  large  ships 
about  the  year  1000  B.C.  Coasting  along  the  shore 
from  California  to  Darien  they  found  it  occupied 
by  a  barbarous  people  to  whom  they  communicated 
a  knowledge  of  the  Supreme  Deity.  All  of  these 
histories  assert  that  at  the  beginning  the  civilisation 
was  imported  by  strangers,  who  brought  with  them 
not  only  a  knowledge  of  the  Supreme  Deity  but  of 
the  sciences  and  the  mechanical  arts.  In  addition, 
they  introduced  cotton  and  maize,  cultivated 
potatoes,  plantains  and  other  vegetables,  taught 
spinning,  weaving,  and  dyeing,  and  this  not  from 
vegetable  products  only  but  from  the  juice  of  the 
murex.  They  also  taught  the  mining  of  tin  and 
copper,  and  the  amalgamation  of  these  metals  into 
bronze,  likewise  the  making  of  paper  from  the  fibre 
of  the  magney  plant  into  sheets  which,  in  some  cases, 
measured  120  feet  in  length  by  6  feet  in  breadth  and  a 
finger  in  thickness.  On  these  were  recorded  historic 
events,  while  sheets  of  lighter  weight  were  used  for 
religious  and  decorative  purposes. 

Identified  with  this  imported  civilisation  we  find 
Semitic  totemism,  which,  so  far  as  is  known,  was 
never  borrowed,  phallicism,  circumcision,  tattooing, 
scalping,  steam  bathing,  lassooing,  picture  writing, 
the  system  of  intercalation,  the  use  of  quipus, 


THE    PROBLEM    OF    THE    AZTEC      193 

gymnasiums  in  which  games  like  the  Greek  palastrae 
were  celebrated,  and  all  the  implements  used  in 
the  chase  and  in  warfare  common  to  the  early  Asiatic 
and  European  nations. 

Another  evidence  showing  that  the  communi 
cation  which  resulted  in  the  first  settlement  of  the 
American  Continent  reached  back  to  the  date  of 
these  historic  expeditions,  is  the  fact  that  founda 
tions  of  the  oldest  towns  are  erected  on  massive 
substructions  which  were  characteristically  peculiar 
to  the  Syrian  and  Egyptian  architects. 

It  is  true  that  these  ruins  contain  very  different 
types,  which  suggest  a  long  and  continuous  residence 
in  these  regions  by  a  vast  population,  who  may  have 
built  them  at  different  times,  but  those  which  are 
most  clearly  identified  with  the  earliest  traditions 
of  the  people  are  uniform  in  using  the  substruction 
in  their  erection,  in  their  decorative  types,  and  in 
the  ability  shown  in  the  cutting  and  handling  of 
immense  masses  of  masonry  such  as  those  at  Nachan, 
Mayapan,  and  other  places  to  which  tradition  points 
the  cradles  of  the  civilised  races. 

Admitting,  then,  that  the  problem  of  the  peopling 
of  America  still  requires  to  be  solved,  it  is  clear  that 
any  attempt  to  do  so  must  necessarily  resolve  itself 
into  two  divisions.  First,  what  was  the  origin  of 
the  uncivilised  ?  and,  second,  what  was  the  origin 
of  the  civilised  nations  ?  If  we  accept  the  Votanic 
tradition  that  the  civilisation  was  an  exotic,  we  are 
naturally  forced  to  a  consideration  of  the  enigma 
whence  emanated  the  barbarous  people  found  on 
the  Pacific  coasts  by  this  culture  hero. 

To  the  first  of  these  questions  it  is  probable  that 
we  will  never  be  able  to  give  a  wholly  satisfactory 
answer,  for  we  have  no  information  with  regard  to 

N 


194    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

the  date  at  which  Igh  and  Imox  arrived  or  to  the 
movements  of  those  who  may  have  accompanied 
them  and  been  the  progenitors  of  these  people. 

The  presence  of  some  of  these  types,  identified 
in  a  peculiar  manner  with  both  the  uncivilised  and 
the  civilised  races  on  the  American  Continent,  can 
only  be  accounted  for  by  accepting  the  Votanic 
tradition  at  its  face  value,  and  by  believing  what 
we  have  already  shown  to  be  the  case,  that  those 
expeditions  which  brought  and  planted  on  the 
Pacific  slopes  a  ripened  civilisation  brought  at  the 
same  time  a  larger  proportion  of  population  that  was 
only  a  short  way  removed  from  the  barbaric  state. 
These  in  the  main  did  not  amalgamate  with,  but 
separated  themselves  from,  the  seats  of  civilisation, 
and,  returning  to  their  old  nomadic  habits  and 
barbarous  customs,  overran  the  entire  country  and 
ultimately,  during  the  2500  years  of  isolation  that 
elapsed  from  the  date  of  the  first  settlement  until 
the  continent  was  rediscovered  by  Columbus  in 
1492,  occupied  every  portion  of  it  from  Mexico  to 
Alaska. 

When,  however,  we  come  to  a  consideration  of 
the  source  from  which  the  civilised  nations  derived 
their  origin  we  are  on  much  surer  ground.  Some 
of  the  types  found  among  the  civilised  states  of 
America  are  so  distinctive  in  their  artificiality  and 
so  closely  identified  with  certain  circumscribed 
centres  of  culture  in  the  Old  World  that  they  provide 
an  infallible  means  of  determining  the  source  from, 
and  the  channel  through  which,  they  were  derived. 
The  date  which  the  American  traditions  provide 
for  the  arrival  of  the  emigrants  who  carried  thither 
this  civilisation,  moreover,  corresponds  exactly  with 
those  historic  movements  of  the  foremost  nations  of 


THE    PROBLEM    OF    THE    AZTEC      195 

Asia  at  that  period,  the  destination  of  which,  when 
identified  with  the  traditions  found  on  the  Pacific 
shores  of  America,  supply  every  fact  that  is  essential 
to   a    complete   solution   of   our   enigma.     It   is   a 
curious  and  startling  fact  that  the  peculiar  charac 
teristics  of  the  four  nations   which  comprised  the 
personnel  of  the  fleets  of  Hiram  and  Solomon  can 
be    clearly    traced    to    this   region.     These    written 
records  emphatically  state  that  Votan  placed  the 
four  nations  in  separate  territories   (Ency.  Brit.,  i. 
704),  which  probably  enough  corresponded  to  the 
peculiar  antecedents  of  the  people.     Furthermore, 
they  show  that  Nachan,  or  the  city  of  the  serpents, 
the  first  city  erected  by  the  newcomers,  is  practically 
synonymous  with  that  of  Nashon — the  serpent — the 
family  name  of  the  leading  partner  in  these  expedi 
tions  of  which  tribe  or  family  Votan  claimed  to  be 
a  member. 

The  claim  that  America  was  the  destination  of 
the  expeditions  of  Hiram  and  Solomon  will,  however, 
be  found  as  we  proceed  not  to  rest  solely  on  these 
strange  and  significant  facts,  but  to  be  supported 
by  a  mass  of  co-ordinate  evidence  of  the  most 
startling  and  convincing  character  supplied  by  a 
careful  analysis  of  the  constitution  and  structure 
of  the  so-called  native  society  found  there.  The 
interrelation,  too,  of  many  of  the  customs  on  the 
American  Continent  which  originally  marked  off  the 
nations  practising  them  from  the  rest  of  mankind, 
make  it  apparent  that  the  representatives  of  these 
nations  must  for  some  considerable  period  after  their 
arrival  have  lived  in  amity. 

According  to  the  native  documents  referred  to, 
Votan,  the  first  of  the  American  legislators,  is  said 
himself  to  have  written  a  history  of  the  race  to  which 


196    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

he  belonged.  He  claimed  to  be  descended  from  the 
same  stock  as  Igh  and  Imox,  and  to  have  come  from 
a  country  which  he  called  the  land  of  Chi  vim, 
separated  from  the  new  continent,  which  he  called 
the  land  of  Votan,  by  seas  and  lands  which  necessi 
tated  a  long  and  perilous  journey.  Votan  also 
claimed  to  have  proceeded  by  divine  command  to 
America  and  there  portioned  out  the  land.  On 
one  of  those  journeys  which,  as  plenipotentiary,  he 
made  from  the  land  of  Votan  to  the  land  of  Chi  vim, 
which  is  clearly  enough  to  be  identified  with  the 
Phoenician  and  Jewish  Chittim  on  the  Eastern 
Mediterranean,  he  claimed  to  have  visited  the  dwell 
ings  of  the  thirteen  serpents,  which  were  those  of 
the  thirteen  tribes  of  Israel  who  held  the  reptile  in 
special  veneration.  While  there  he  saw  a  magnifi 
cent  temple  in  course  of  construction  which,  clearly 
enough,  was  that  being  erected  for  Solomon  by  an 
army  of  Jewish,  Egyptian,  and  Phoenician  work 
men.  He  further  states  that,  in  the  course  of  this 
journey,  he  passed  the  ruins  of  an  old  building, 
undoubtedly  that  of  Babel  in  Borsippa,  a  suburb 
of  Babylon,  which  men  had  erected  with  a  view  to 
reaching  heaven,  and  which,  according  to  the  men 
who  lived  in  the  neighbourhood,  was  the  place 
where  God  had  given  to  each  family  its  own  peculiar 
language. 

On  returning  from  the  first  of  four  voyages  which 
he  claimed  to  have  made  from  this  land  of  Votan  to 
the  land  of  Chivim,  Votan  said  that  he  found  some 
portion  of  the  first  emigrants — in  all  probability 
the  Scythians,  who,  we  have  shown,  tolerated  the 
presence  of  no  foreign  customs  among  themselves— 
had  fomented  a  rebellion  and  attempted  to  disrupt 
his  kingdom.  In  consequence,  and  with  a  view  to 


THE    PROBLEM    OF    THE    AZTEC      197 

retaining  his  authority,  he  divided  the  people  into  four 
sections,  which  corresponded  with  the  four  nations 
which  comprised  the  personnel  of  the  fleets  of  Hiram 
and  Solomon,  and  placed  them  in  territories  corres 
ponding  to  their  peculiar  traditions  and  antecedents. 

According  to  the  Quiche  tradition,  the  first 
emigrants  came  from  the  land  of  the  setting  sun, 
and  were  white  men  taller  and  of  larger  build  than 
the  present  inhabitants  of  the  region.  They  carried 
the  mechanical  arts  and  the  sciences  to  a  high  degree 
of  perfection.  They  were  likewise  pearl-fishers,  and 
used  the  juice  of  the  murex  as  well  as  vegetable 
juices  in  the  manufacture  of  their  dyes.  They  were 
also  well  acquainted  with  the  medicinal  properties 
of  plants,  and  kept  books  for  the  purpose  of  record 
ing  their  observations  on  the  cause  and  progress  of 
disease.  Their  astronomical  knowledge  embraced 
all  those  features  peculiar  to  the  nations  of  the 
Eastern  Mediterranean. 

It  is  true,  for  reasons  already  stated,  that  the 
attempt  to  show  that  the  architecture  of  the  Central 
American  States  was  directly  derived  from  any  Old 
World  type  has  not  been  successful.  Yet  the  unique 
method  of  employing  immense  substructions  in  the 
erection  of  their  buildings,  likewise  the  curiously 
composite  character  of  their  decorations,  which 
show  clearly  Phoenician,  Assyrian,  Egyptian,  and 
Grecian  influence,  combined  with  much  that  is  indi 
genous,  gives  such  clear  evidence  of  an  Old  World 
origin  as  to  leave  little  room  as  to  the  source  from 
which  the  initial  impulse  was  derived. 

It  will  be  unnecessary,  however,  to  pursue  this 
investigation  further  on  these  lines,  for  in  our  in 
duction  it  will  be  found  that  the  solution  of  the 
problem  of  the  origin  of  the  Aztec  depends  solely 


198    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

on  the  number,  strength,  and  aptness  of  the  corres 
pondences  which  can  be  established  between  the 
Mediterranean  basin  and  the  Pacific  Islands,  and 
between  the  Mediterranean  and  the  Pacific  coasts  of 
the  American  Continent. 

It  will  be  prudent,  therefore,  to  arrange  these 
correspondences  under  the  various  headings  to 
which  they  belong  and  allow  the  reader  to  draw  his 
own  conclusions,  which  he  will  have  the  less  difficulty 
in  doing  in  that  the  authorities  quoted  are,  without 
exception,  first-class. 


CHAPTER    IX 

THE   ANCIENT   AMERICAN   CIVILISATION 

Constituent  parts  of  ancient  American  civilisation — The  region  described 
— Maya  and  Nahua  civilisations — Their  identity  of  origin — Aztec  as 
the  representative  of  Nahua  civilisation— The  foreign  civiliser  in 
Mexico — Composite  source  of  Pacific  civilisation  explained — The 
part  played  by  the  Phoenicians. 

As  what  has  been  said  in  the  preceding  pages 
supports  entirely  the  view  of  the  scientific  world 
in  regard  to  the  antiquity  of  the  American  civilisa 
tion,  further  amplification  of  the  subject  would  be 
superfluous.  With  a  view,  however,  to  clarifying 
the  problem,  a  few  words  relative  to  the  constituent 
parts  of  this  ancient  American  civilisation  may  not 
be  inappropriate. 

That  portion  of  the  Pacific  States  of  America, 
with  which  the  development  of  this  civilisation  was 
identified,  stretches  from  north-west  to  south-east 
along  both  shores  of  the  continent  between  latitudes 
23°  and  11°  north  of  the  equator.  Outside  of  these 
limits  few  traces  exist  that  are  of  much  service  in 
the  solution  of  our  problem,  but  within  them  few 
tribes  lived  who  were  not  profoundly  influenced  and 
improved  by  contact  with  the  ancient  American 
civilisation.  The  central  or  Usumacinta  region  was 
the  most  ancient  home  to  which  by  monument, 
tradition,  or  record  this  civilisation  could  be  traced. 
For  many  centuries  prior  to  the  Christian  era  it 
was  the  seat  of  the  Maya  Kingdom  of  the  Chans  or 
Serpents,  whose  capital  was  Nachan  or  Palenque, 


199 


200     THE    PHCENIC1ANS    AND    AMERICA 

to  which  reference  has  already  been  made.  From 
this  centre,  which  embraced  one  of  the  most  de 
lightful  and  fertile  regions  of  the  New  World,  the 
Votanic  power  gradually  extended  northward 
towards  Anahuac,  whose  people  appear  in  the  tra 
ditional  records  either  as  physical  or  intellectual 
Quinames  or  giants.  It  also  penetrated  eastward 
into  Yucatan,  where  the  culture  hero,  Zamna, 
appears  as  its  reputed  founder,  with  the  Cocomes 
and  Itzas  as  his  subjects.  The  mean  temperature 
of  this  region  is  about  60°  F.,  so  that  the  climate 
may  generally  be  described  as  similar  to  that  of 
Southern  Europe.  The  soil  originally  was  fertile, 
although  now,  in  consequence  of  the  excessive 
evaporation  common  to  lofty  plateaus  exposed  to 
a  tropical  sun  and  the  depletion  of  the  forests  since 
the  Spanish  Conquest,  which  tends  to  reduce  the 
rainfall,  many  portions  present  a  bare  and  parched 
appearance. 

The  two  great  divisions  under  which,  for  con 
venience  sake,  the  civilisation  which  occupied  this 
territory  was  grouped,  were  called  respectively  the 
Maya  and  the  Nahua,  the  former  of  these  repre 
senting  the  Maya  Quiche  civilisation  of  Central 
America  and  the  latter  the  Toltec  and  Aztec  civil 
isations  of  America. 

The  Mayas  are  invariably  represented  as  the  most 
ancient  of  these  two  divisions  of  this  civilisation, 
and  to  them  is  attributed  the  wonderful  stone  re 
mains  found  at  Nachan  or  Palenque,  Uxmal,  and 
Copan  with  which  the  Votanic  traditions  are  most 
clearly  and  intimately  identified.  Nearly  all  the 
knowledge  we  possess  with  respect  to  the  institu 
tions  and  people  of  the  Maya  empire  has  been  de 
rived  from  the  traditions  and  records  of  the  Nahua 


ANCIENT    AMERICAN    CIVILISATION     201 

nation,  which  in  the  earlier  stages  of  its  growth 
seems  to  have  been  profoundly  influenced  by  the 
older  civilisation.  In  some  respects  the  Nahua 
nation  seems  to  have  stood  in  much  the  same  re 
lation  to  the  older  Maya  kingdom  in  the  New  World 
that  Carthage  did  to  Phoenicia  in  the  Old. 

Owing  to  the  meagre  information  relative  to  the 
first  movements  of  population,  there  is  great  diffi 
culty  in  drawing  divisional  lines  between  two  nations 
mutually  acting  and  reacting  on  each  other  as  these 
must  have  done  during  several  centuries.  And  this 
difficulty  is  increased  when  it  is  recollected  that 
these  two  nations  and  their  subdivisions  constitute 
the  central  figure  around  which  revolves  practically 
all  that  has  been  either  observed  or  written  on  the 
subject  of  the  American  civilisation  by  the  few 
travellers  who  came  in  personal  contact  with  it. 

The  identity  of  origin  in  the  Maya  and  Nahua 
civilisations,  however,  does  not  rest  on  slender 
foundations  but  on  the  religious,  scientific,  manu 
facturing,  commercial,  and  caravan  systems.  The 
similarities  that  can  be  established  between  these 
are  so  striking  as  to  make  it  clear  that  there  is  both 
good  reason  for  and  convenience  in  speaking  of  the 
American  civilisation  only  in  connection  with  these 
two  main  branches,  the  Maya  the  more  ancient, 
the  Nahua  the  more  modern  and  widespread.  It 
is  true  that  in  comparing  these  two  branches  of  this 
very  ancient  civilisation  many  points  of  difference 
crop  up.  Yet  they  can  be  explained  satisfactorily 
by  supposing  that  for  some  centuries  prior  to  the 
Spanish  Conquest  the  two  nations  had  been  pro 
gressing  along  independent  lines.  The  language  of 
the  two  peoples  especially  shows  little  affinity, 
though  it  is  well  not  to  attach  too  much  importance 


202    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

to  evidence  which  language  alone  affords,  more 
especially  in  view  of  what  has  been  said  of  the  con 
glomerate  character  of  the  fleets  which  brought 
this  civilisation  to  America. 

The  Nahua,  which  succeeded  and  overshadowed 
the  Maya  civilisation,  included  both  that  of  the 
Toltecs  and  Aztecs,  and  also  that  now  embraced 
by  the  Mexican  Republic  north  of  Tehuantepec. 
Modern  writers  always  make  the  Aztecs  the  repre 
sentatives  of  the  Nahua  civilisation,  although  the 
limits  of  the  Aztec  empire,  exclusive  of  their  pos 
sessions  in  Texcuco  and  Tlacopan,  were  only  from 
18°  to  21°  north  of  the  equator  on  the  Atlantic,  and 
from  14°  to  19°  on  the  Pacific,  which  would  not 
embrace  the  whole  of  the  civilised  states.  This 
choice  of  the  Aztec  as  the  representatives  of  the 
Nahua  civilisation  is,  however,  quite  fitting,  for  they 
were  certainly  the  most  powerful  branch,  and  what 
we  know  of  this  people  has  furnished  the  material 
for  nine-tenths  of  all  that  has  been  written  on  the 
general  subject  of  the  American  civilisation.  Ac 
cordingly  the  name  Aztec  has  been  adopted  as  a 
generic  term. 

Whether  it  is  possible  to  distinguish  between 
Votan,  who  is  always  accorded  the  distinction  of 
being  the  original  culture  hero,  and  Quetzalcoatt, 
Zamna,  and  Cuculcan,  who  are  accredited  with 
having  taught  some  portions  of  this  region  the 
sciences  and  mechanical  and  fine  arts,  as  well  as  a 
knowledge  of  the  Supreme  Deity,  it  is  hard  to  de 
termine,  since  the  career  of  these  minor  culture 
heroes  seem  in  all  respects  to  have  been  identical 
with  that  of  Votan  in  Chiapas.  Be  that  as  it  may, 
it  is  clear  that  all  of  them  claimed  to  belong  to  the 
same  race  and  to  the  same  totem  clan,  for  Quet- 


ANCIENT    AMERICAN    CIVILISATION     203 

zalcoatt  in  the  native  tongue  means  the  royal  or 
feathered  serpent,  and  the  name  Cocomes,  worn  by 
the  oldest  line  of  kings  and  nobles  in  Yucatan  to 
which  Zamna  carried  his  civilisation,  signifies,  like 
the  name  Chan  applied  to  the  companions  and 
followers  of  Votan,  a  serpent. 

If,  in  view  of  what  has  been  said,  we  admit  that 
there  existed  on  the  American  Continent  a  body  of 
tradition  worthy  of  the  highest  respect,  one  peculiar 
circumstance  regarding  it,  as  Humboldt  remarks, 
demands  serious  consideration,  viz.,  that  in  these 
ancient  records  of  the  civilised  American  races  we 
find  no  less  than  three  apparently  independent  and 
remarkable  traditions  of  the  planting  of  a  superior 
civilisation  among  separate  sections  of  the  native 
peoples  on  the  western  shores  of  the  continent,  and 
that  in  each  case  they  attributed  this  to  the  sudden 
and  mysterious  appearance  of  persons  who  differed 
from  them  in  dress  and  nationality — Bohica  among 
the  Mozca  Indians,  who  occupy  the  plains  of  Bogota, 
Manco  Capuc,  accompanied  by  his  sister  wife,  Mama 
Oello  among  the  Peruvians,  and  Votan  in  Mexico. 

The  clearest  and  most  circumstantial  account 
of  the  mysterious  appearance  of  the  foreign  civiliser 
is  not,  however,  found  in  Bogota  or  Peru,  but  in 
Mexico,  where,  as  has  been  shown,  he  is  sometimes 
called  Votan  and  sometimes  Quetzalcoatt,  Zamna, 
or  Cuculcan.  Yet  in  every  instance  he  is  described 
in  the  native  records  as  a  white  man  of  commanding 
appearance,  with  broad  brow,  wearing  long  flowing 
robes,  and  designated  a  serpent.  He  gave  to  the 
people  good  laws,  taught  them  refinement  of  manners, 
communicated  to  them  a  knowledge  of  the  one  true 
God,  and  succeeded  in  dissuading  them  from  the 
horrible  custom  of  human  sacrifice. 


204    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

But  we  are  not  wholly  dependent  on  traditions 
and  native  records  for  the  solution  of  the  perplexing 
problem,  whence  emanated  the  population  of  the 
Pacific  Islands  and  the  American  Continent.  Our 
task  is  simplified  by  finding  over  the  entire  route 
from  Eziongeber  to  Mexico  traces  of  the  presence  of 
a  somewhat  advanced  civilisation  of  the  most  ancient 
character  which  corresponds  in  all  essential  features 
with  that  found  in  the  first  centres  of  civilisation, 
in  Peru,  Bogota,  and  Mexico.  Furthermore,  all  of 
these  are  pervaded  by  a  common  influence  easily 
recognisable  as  having  emanated  from  the  com 
bined  elements  of  Phoenicia  in  its  religious,  scien 
tific,  and  material,  and  of  Israel  in  its  moral  aspects, 
but  with  which  are  interwoven  still  other  elements 
clearly  derived  from  the  semi-civilised  nations  of 
the  Eastern  Mediterranean  of  that  period.  Now 
their  presence  on  the  Pacific  shores  can  only  be 
explained  satisfactorily  by  believing  that  at  some 
very  remote  date,  the  four  great  nations  of  the 
Mediterranean  basin,  the  Jews,  Phoenicians,  Scy 
thians,  and  Thracians,  were  by  some  peculiar  com 
bination  of  circumstances  united  in  the  prosecution 
of  some  naval  expedition  which  started  from  an 
Asiatic  port,  and  proceeding  through  the  central 
insular  Pacific  to  the  west  coasts  of  the  American 
Continent,  made  these  territories  tributory  to  their 
enterprises. 

If  we  admit  this  presumption,  then  we  are  at 
once  forced  to  a  consideration  of  the  reliability  of 
the  data  on  which  we  have  founded  in  our  research 
with  respect  to  the  historic  movements  and  the 
similarity  of  the  essential  features  of  the  early 
Asiatic  and  European  and  the  American  civilisations. 

Now  we  have    been  careful  to  show  that  the 


ANCIENT    AMERICAN    CIVILISATION      205 

authorities  on  which  we  have  relied  are  of  so  reliable 
a  character  that  they  leave  practically  nothing 
further  to  be  desired,  so  that  when  their  testimony 
is  supplemented  by  still  further  information  with 
respect  to  the  Pacific  drawn  from  equally  reliable 
sources,  we  are  in  possession  of  a  body  of  evidence 
enabling  us  to  account  in  a  very  practical  way  for 
every  complexity  with  which  at  the  outset  we  found 
the  problem  to  be  invested. 

Moreover,  the  evidence  satisfactorily  explains 
the  enigma  of  the  presence  of  the  many  racial  types 
and  linguistic  differences  and  usages  found  on  the 
Pacific  slopes.  For  the  changes  that  took  place  in 
the  evolution  of  society  from  the  curiously  composite 
source  that  formed  the  elements  of  their  first  migra 
tions  were  not  always  either  in  the  same  direction 
or  of  the  same  intensity,  and  must,  therefore,  through 
the  twenty-five  hundred  years  of  complete  isolation 
have  produced  departures  from  the  original  types 
of  the  most  startling  character  which,  with  the 
meagre  information  in  our  possession,  it  would  be 
unwise  to  attempt  to  follow. 

But  after  making  due  allowances  for  the  changes 
that  took  place  between  the  date  of  the  first  settle 
ments  on  the  Pacific  Islands  and  the  European  re 
discovery  of  America,  there  still  remains  sufficient 
data  to  enable  us  to  solve  this  perplexing  enigma. 

If  the  American  Continent  was  discovered  and 
peopled  by  a  nation  that  carried  thither  the  advanced 
civilisation  with  which  the  Mediterranean  basin 
was  identified  a  thousand  years  before  the  Christian 
era,  then  it  is  to  the  Phoenicians  and  to  that  nation 
only  that  we  must  look  either  for  its  origin  or  its 
intermediation.  This  view  will  be  readily  endorsed 
after  a  consideration  of  the  correspondences  estab- 


206    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

lished  between  the  American  and  the  Mediterranean 
basin  civilisation,  which  we  now  append,  and  of  the 
"  Inductio  per  enumerationem  simpliccm  "  sup 
ported  by  the  authorities  which  follow  and  on  which 
it  is  based. 

These  we  believe  represent  the  only  rational 
conclusions  that  can  be  drawn  either  from  the  situa 
tion  itself  or  from  the  data  on  which  the  research 
is  founded. 


CHAPTER    X 

EASTERN   MEDITERRANEAN   AND   AMERICAN 
CIVILISATIONS   COMPARED 

Similarities  as  shown  by  commercial  system,  use  of  dyes,  woollen  and 
cotton  manufactures,  precious  metals,  glass  manufactures,  pearl- 
fishing,  tanning,  tattooing,  implements  of  war,  gymnasia,  religion, 
laws,  &c. 

DURING  the  heyday  of  its  prosperity  the  carrying 
trade  of  the  ancient  world  was  in  the  hands  of 
Phoenicia.  The  land  trade  of  Tyre  alone  was  of 
the  most  extraordinary  character.  It  extended  to 
Cappadocia  and  Armenia  in  the  north,  to  Mesapo- 
tamia,  Assyria,  Babylonia,  and  the  Persian  Gulf  in 
the  east,  to  Palestine  and  Egypt  in  the  west,  and 
to  Central  and  Southern  Arabia  in  the  south.  From 
all  these  widely  separated  regions  caravans,  formed 
of  numerous  bodies  of  armed  merchants,  plunged 
into  the  heart  of  the  continent  and,  penetrating 
through  inhospitable  regions,  brought  back  that 
wealth  of  raw  and  manufactured  material  which  was 
necessary  for  the  prosecution  of  their  enterprises. 

With  the  establishment  of  systematic  trade 
routes  the  caravansary  or  building  for  the  accom 
modation  of  the  caravans  at  the  various  halting- 
places  sprang  into  existence.  These  caravansaries 
were  usually  large  quadrangular  enclosures  with  a 
well  in  the  centre.  They,  however,  possessed  no 
accommodation  further  than  was  supplied  by  a 
row  of  single  or  double  chambers  where  the  traveller 


207 


208    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

was  at  liberty  to  take  up  his  quarters  for  the  night, 
being  left  to  provide  for  himself  such  further  com 
fort  and  food  as  might  be  necessary  for  himself  and 
his  beast. 

This  system  of  commerce  was  not  confined  to 
Asia  and  Africa,  but,  as  we  shall  see  later,  extended 
to  America. 

In  ancient  times  the  only  place  of  resort  for 
merchants  in  Egypt  was  at  Naucratis  (Herod,  ii. 
109),  so  at  Tlatelulco,  an  independent  city  in  Mexico, 
was  situated  the  great  commercial  centre  of  the 
civilised  states  of  Anahuac.  The  merchants  of  this 
city  were  not  only  a  separate  class  of  the  population, 
but  so  far  as  the  higher  grades  were  concerned  pos 
sessed  the  same  privileges  as  the  nobles.  They  also 
had  tribunals  like  those  at  Naucratis,  to  which  alone 
they  were  responsible  for  the  regulation  of  matters 
affecting  trade  and  commerce.  So  powerful  were 
these  merchants  that  they  formed  a  commercial 
corporation  controlling  the  whole  trade  of  the 
country,  the  leading  merchants  of  other  cities  only 
being  enrolled  as  subordinate  members.  As  among 
the  early  Asiatic  nations  so  among  the  Nahuas 
trade  was  mainly  carried  on  by  barter,  no  coined 
money  being  used.  Several  convenient  substitutes 
were,  however,  found  among  the  civilised  peoples 
of  America  to  furnish  a  convenient  medium  of  ex 
change.  Chief  among  these  were  nibs  or  grains  of 
cacao,  which  were  known  as  Ratlachti.  Another 
was  gold  dust,  which  was  kept  in  translucent  quills. 
Copper  cut  into  small  pieces  like  a  T  was  much  used, 
and  was  the  nearest  approach  to  coinage,  while  tin 
was  not  only  mined,  as  among  the  Phoenicians, 
but  cut  into  pieces  of  determined  size  and  weight 
and  circulated  as  money.  Merchandise  among  the 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED          209 

Nahuas  was  likewise  sold  by  count  and  measure, 
both  of  length  and  capacity. 

The  principal  markets  were  in  the  city  of  Mexico, 
and  at  Tlatelulco.  Thither,  as  Torquemada  says, 
flocked  the  workers  in  gold  and  jewellery,  potters, 
painters,  shoemakers,  huntsmen,  fishermen,  fruit 
growers,  and  matmakers  from  the  surrounding 
regions  to  display  their  wares  to  possible  purchasers, 
who  gathered  there  in  such  numbers  that,  according 
to  Las  Casas,  each  of  the  two  markets  in  the  city  of 
Mexico  could  easily  accommodate  200,000  persons, 
and  into  that  at  Tlatelulco  60,000  persons  crowded 
daily.  The  general  commerce  of  the  country,  while 
finding  an  outlet  at  these  markets  as  did  the  trade 
of  Ophir  at  Yemen  and  that  of  ancient  Egypt  at 
Naucratis,  was  not  confined  to  these  distributing 
centres,  but,  like  that  of  Asia,  extended  over  the 
whole  country,  the  outlying  towns  and  districts 
being  brought,  by  means  of  caravans,  into  active 
association  with  the  central  markets. 

TRADING  EXPEDITIONS 

The  absence  of  the  horse  and  camel  in  Centra 
America  was  not  an  insuperable  obstacle  to  the  pro 
secution  of  an  extensive  export  and  import  trade, 
for  regular  carriers,  trained  in  the  same  way  as 
camels  in  Asia,  were  found  to  provide  an  admirable 
substitute.  The  burden  apportioned  to  each  duly 
qualified  carrier  was  from  sixty  to  eighty  pounds. 
This  was  placed  on  the  back  and  was  supported  by 
a  strap  which  passed  round  the  forehead.  Twelve 
to  fourteen  miles  a  day  were  easily  accomplished 
by  a  carrier  when  so  loaded. 

Nor  were  the  expeditions  so  equipped  of  a  limited 

o 


210    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

character.  Distant  provinces  were  kept  within  the 
range  of  operations  of  the  merchant  princes  of 
Tlatelulco,  who  sent  out  caravans  periodically 
either  for  commercial  purposes  or  under  the  direc 
tion  of  the  king  for  political  objects,  when  the  mer 
chants  were  armed  soldiers  in  disguise.  Such  ex 
peditions  in  America,  as  in  Asia,  were  undertaken 
by  large  numbers  travelling  in  company  for  mutual 
protection,  one  of  the  prominent  members  of  the 
expedition  being  selected  as  leader  and  directing 
the  movements  of  the  whole  caravan.  On  the  route 
the  carriers,  as  in  the  regular  Asiatic  caravans, 
marched  in  single  file,  a  sharp  look-out  being  kept 
on  the  road  and  at  camping-places  for  robbers  who, 
as  in  the  older  seats  of  civilisation,  infested  the 
mountain  passes. 

Rulers  of  the  various  districts  through  which 
the  caravans  periodically  passed  recognising,  as  in 
Asia,  the  benefits  which  accrued  to  their  territory 
from  an  uninterrupted  commercial  communication, 
constructed  roads,  built  bridges,  and  erected  at 
regular  intervals  along  the  routes  caravansaries 
where  the  traveller  could  find  rest  and  shelter. 

CARAVAN  SYSTEM 

Among  the  ancient  Maya  nations  a  brisk  com 
merce  existed,  merchants  traversing  the  country  in 
every  direction.  Yucatan  did  a  large  foreign  trade 
with  Tobasco  and  Honduras,  and  imported  from 
these  regions  large  quantities  of  the  cacao. 

The  Nahua  merchants  were  not  less  enterprising. 
They  crossed  the  entire  isthmus  of  Tehuan tepee  to 
trade  among  the  Mayas,  while  the  Mayas,  equally 
familiar  with  the  northern  markets,  kept  up  an 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED          211 

active  exchange  of  commodities  year  in  and  year 
out  by  means  of  caravans. 

The  caravan  system  of  the  merchants  of  Tlatelulco 
was  most  extensive.  When  setting  out  the  cara 
vans  usually  pursued  a  south-easterly  course  to 
the  town  of  Tochtepec,  near  the  banks  of  the  Rio 
Alvarado,  which,  like  Damascus  in  Syria,  seems  to 
have  been  the  radiating  point  from  which  they  split 
up  into  sections,  as  the  destination  at  which  they 
aimed  might  demand  roads  leading  to  Goazocoalco 
or  to  the  Miztec  and  Zapotec  towns  on  the  Pacific, 
or  to  the  more  distant  provinces  that  lay  across  the 
isthmus  of  Tehuantepec. 

The  routes  so  used  were  usually  well-defined, 
but  in  order  that  no  mistake  might  be  made,  maps, 
as  seems  to  have  been  customary  on  the  Mediter 
ranean  (Herod.,  iii.  136,  and  v.  49),  were  regularly 
used. 

This  custom  of  map-making  seems  to  have  ex 
tended  along  the  entire  Pacific  coast  as  far  north  as 
the  Columbia  River,  for  Di  Smet  says  that  the 
aboriginal  tribes  of  that  region  were  accustomed  to 
make  maps  of  the  country  on  bark  and  skins. 
More  remarkable  still,  they  used  the  Phoenician  or 
Pole  Star  in  the  prosecution  of  their  journeys  by 
night. 

PURPLE  DYE 

There  is  probably  no  stronger  evidence  of  the 
presence  of  the  Phoenician  in  the  New  World  than 
can  be  drawn  from  the  use  of  dyes.  In  the  pre 
paration  of  dyes  and  paints  derived  from  animal, 
vegetable,  and  mineral  substances  the  natives  of 
the  Pacific  Coast  States  were  found  to  be  in  posses 
sion  of  a  skill  much  in  advance  of  that  existing 


212     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

among   contemporaneous    European   nations    when 
the  continent  was  rediscovered  by  Columbus. 

The  remarkable  fact  in  connection  with  this 
branch  of  Nahua  art  is  not  that  the  people  were 
expert  in  the  preparation  and  use  of  dyes,  but  that 
those  drawn  from  the  juice  of  the  murex  held  a 
pre-eminent  position,  the  inhabitants  of  the  state 
of  Jalisco  in  Mexico  and  those  of  Nicaragua  obtain 
ing  the  much-prized  purple  from  the  murex  or 
purple  fish  that  were  found  on  the  coast.  Bailey 
says  that  the  dyeing  among  the  natives  was,  more 
over,  as  among  the  Phoenicians,  done  in  the  wool, 
the  material  to  be  dyed  being  taken  to  the  sea 
shore  where,  after  procuring  a  sufficient  quantity 
of  shell-fish  and  extracting  the  colouring  matter, 
each  thread  was  dipped  in  it  separately  and  then 
laid  aside  to  dry. 

WOOLLEN  AND  COTTON  MANUFACTURE 

But  it  was  in  the  manufacture  of  woollen  and 
cotton  stuffs  that  the  people  of  the  civilised  Ameri 
can  states  chiefly  excelled.  The  natives  of  Jalisco 
in  Mexico  were  from  the  beginning  celebrated  for 
the  mantuas  and  blankets  which  issued  from  their 
looms.  But  the  art  was  by  no  means  confined  to 
Mexico.  Among  the  Mojave  and  Axua  Indians 
both  weaving  and  dyeing  were  carried  to  a  remark 
able  degree  of  excellence.  The  Navajos  likewise 
were  famous  for  their  blankets. 

India,  as  we  have  shown  by  reference  to  Hero 
dotus  (iii.  106),  was  the  native  home  of  the  cotton 
plant,  certain  trees  there  bearing  wool  instead  of 
fruit.  According  to  Theophrastus  (Hist,  of  Plants, 
iv.  9),  this  plant  was  carried  from  India  to  the 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  213 

Bahrein  Islands,  presumably  through  Phoenician 
intermediation,  and  it  is  a  curious  fact  that  the 
American  traditions  distinctly  attribute  the  intro 
duction  of  cotton  and  maize  into  that  country  to 
the  culture  hero  Votan  or  his  lieutenant  and  suc 
cessor  Quetzalcoatt,  thus  enabling  us  to  determine 
definitely  the  point  from  which  the  ships  which 
carried  these  first  culture  heroes  set  out. 

The  finer  grades  of  cloth  manufactured  in  the 
civilised  states  of  America  in  the  early  period  were 
invariably  made  of  cotton  or  rabbit's  hair  and  not 
infrequently  from  both  combined.  The  introduc 
tion  of  spinning  and  weaving,  like  that  of  cotton 
itself,  was  distinctly  attributed  to  the  first  culture 
heroes. 

PRECIOUS  METALS 

The  Phoenicians  were  not  only  the  first  syste 
matic  traders  but  the  first  miners  and  metallurgists. 
The  early  Americans  followed  the  same  lines  iden 
tically.  In  the  working  of  gold  and  silver  they 
specially  distinguished  themselves.  Among  the 
Nahua  nations  the  ornamental  working  of  these 
metals  was  carried  to  such  perfection  that  the 
Spaniards  frankly  acknowledged  that  the  products 
of  their  art  not  only  surpassed  that  manufactured 
in  the  civilised  centres  of  Europe,  but  were  of  more 
value  than  the  precious  metal  from  which  they  had 
been  manufactured. 

The  direction  in  which  this  branch  of  Aztec  art 
moved  was  in  the  main  that  of  imitating  natural 
objects  such  as  animals,  birds,  reptiles,  and  fishes, 
and  these  with  such  consummate  skill  that  mov 
able  heads,  tongues,  wings,  and  legs  were  common. 
What  amazed  the  Spaniards  most,  however,  was 


214    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

the  skill  of  the  Aztecs  in  casting  the  various  parts 
of  an  object  in  different  metals,  each  distinct  from 
the  other,  yet  forming  without  soldering  a  homo 
geneous  unit. 


GLASS  MANUFACTURE 

The  extent  to  which  glass  was  manufactured  (for 
which  Sidon  was  so  famous)  among  the  early  civil 
ised  peoples  of  America  is  not  known,  but  that  they 
had  a  knowledge  of  it  seems  certain.  The  Chevalier 
Charnay,  while  prosecuting  a  mission  on  behalf  of 
the  French  Government,  went  to  Zula,  and  while 
superintending  the  excavation  of  mountains  of 
rubbish  that  for  centuries  had  covered  the  relics 
of  the  ancient  Toltecs,  found  not  only  fragments  of 
pottery  of  all  kinds  but  portions  of  a  bottle  made 
of  iridescent  glass  like  that  for  which  the  Phoenicians 
had  been  famous  throughout  antiquity. 

PAPER 

In  the  manufacture  of  paper  we  have  further 
remarkable  evidence  of  the  presence  of  the  Eastern 
Mediterranean  nations  in  America. 

The  widespread  use  of  papyrus  throughout  the 
ancient  world  as  a  writing  material  is  well  known. 
The  process  of  manufacture  among  the  ancients 
seems  to  have  been  much  the  same  as  that  still  in 
use  among  the  South  Sea  islanders  in  the  production 
of  tappa  from  the  paper-mulberry  tree. 

This  product  both  in  America  and  in  the  Pacific 
looked  more  like  coarse  parchment  than  paper,  but 
it  sufficed  for  the  purposes  to  which  it  was  applied. 
While  mainly  used  in  the  Pacific  as  an  article  of 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  215 

dress,  it  was  in  America  chiefly  utilised  as  a  material 
on  which  to  paint  the  hieroglyphic  records. 


PEARL  FISHING 

One  of  the  very  valuable  commodities  obtained 
by  the  Phoenicians  from  their  Persian  Gulf  settle 
ments  was  pearls. 

The  industry  had  a  like  importance  among  the 
peoples  of  the  Pacific  states.  The  Yaquis  Indians 
were  famous  not  only  as  miners  but  as  pearl  fishers, 
pearls,  turquoises,  emeralds,  coral,  and  gold  being 
the  medium  of  exchange  among  them.  In  Potolan 
the  dresses  of  the  nobles  were  embroidered  with 
figures  of  animals  and  birds  formed  of  pearls.  They 
were  also  much  in  request  among  the  Nahuas,  where 
strings  of  precious  stones  with  pearl  pendants  were 
worn  round  the  neck. 


TANNING 

Tanning  was  an  important  industry  among  the 
Phoenicians,  though  curiously  enough  the  authori 
ties  are  silent  as  to  the  processes  used.  The  same, 
however,  is  true  with  respect  to  this  art  among  the 
Central  American  nations.  The  leather  so  pro 
duced  was  as  a  rule  applied  to  the  manufacture  of 
articles  of  dress,  ornament,  and  armour,  but  it  was 
not  infrequently  used  as  parchment. 

QUIPPAS 

It  has  been  said  with  a  considerable  show  of 
learning  that  the  absence  of  the  quippa,  a  system  of 
recording  dates  and  events  by  means  of  knotted 


216    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

cords,  afforded  irrefragable  evidence  that  the  popula 
tion  of  America  was  not  derived  from  any  Old  World 
source.  This  objection  is  not,  however,  well  founded, 
for  Herodotus  (iv.  98)  refers  to  the  use  of  the  in 
strument  in  the  exact  form  in  which  it  is  found  among 
the  peoples  of  the  civilised  states  of  America. 

This  method  of  recording  historic  events  and 
the  passage  of  time  was  not  confined  to  the  Asiatic 
and  American  Continents  but  was  employed  for  a 
similar  purpose  by  the  Pacific  Islanders.  But  the 
most  complete  correspondence  with  the  quippa  of 
Darius  mentioned  by  Herodotus  is  that  found  in 
Mexico.  It  is  peculiarly  interesting,  because  not 
only  is  the  form  but  the  use  to  which  it  was  applied 
found  to  be  identical  in  both  places. 

TATTOOING 

This  custom  provides  another  remarkable  cor 
respondence  between  the  peoples  of  the  Eastern 
Mediterranean  and  America.  Tattooing  was  prac 
tised  almost  universally  from  Alaska  to  Central 
America,  although  the  methods  employed  varied 
according  to  locality. 

In  Yucatan  and  Nicaragua  the  tattooing  was 
effected  by  cutting  the  skin  with  stone  lancets  and 
rubbing  powdered  charcoal  into  the  wound,  which 
left  an  indelible  mark.  Stripes,  serpents,  and  birds 
were  the  favourite  designs.  In  other  parts  of  the 
country  fish-bones  were  employed  to  puncture  the 
surface.  This  practice  was  common  to  both  the 
Maya  and  the  Nahua  nations  and  engaged  in  by 
regular  professors  of  the  art. 

Body  painting  was  universally  practised  among 
the  Maya  nations  as  among  the  Scythian  Budine 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  217 

(Her.  iv.  108),  black  and  red  being  the  colours  most 
in  use.  This  custom  was  not  confined  to  the 
Mexican  and  Central  American  nations,  but  existed 
throughout  the  entire  Pacific  States  and  among  the 
aboriginal  tribes  of  North  America. 

That  this  barbarous  custom,  apparently  of  Asiatic 
origin,  was  practised  by  all  the  ancient  Maya  races 
there  can  be  no  question,  for  on  the  sculpture  ruins 
found  in  Chiapas,  Honduras,  and  Yucatan  promi 
nence  is  given  to  it. 

The  Columbia  River  is  not  infrequently  referred 
to  as  the  centre  from  which  the  custom  radiated  ; 
but  this  opinion  must  clearly,  in  the  light  of  our 
research,  not  be  received  at  its  face  value.  The 
sculptures  at  Nachan  or  Palenque,  the  seat  of  the 
first  population,  show  that,  although  the  outline  of 
the  human  figure  was  drawn  in  various  attitudes 
and  with  great  variety  of  dress  ornaments  and 
insignia,  the  flattened  forehead  always  prevailed, 
making  it  apparent  that  the  custom  radiated  from 
this  and  not  from  a  Columbian  River  centre. 

This  peculiar  cranial  form  was  considered  by  the 
early  Americans  to  be  a  mark  of  nobility.  Like 
tattooing  it  is  highly  probable  that  it  had  a  totemic 
origin,  for,  on  close  inspection,  it  will  be  observed 
that  the  form  sought  to  be  reproduced  was  that  of 
the  flat  serpent  head,  thus  indicating  that  head 
flattening  had  its  origin  among  the  serpent  branch 
of  the  totemic  cult  to  which  Votan,  the  first  culture 
hero,  claimed  to  belong. 

No  essential  difference  existed  between  the 
various  races  in  America  in  this  usage. 

The  Chinooks  of  the  Columbia  River,  as  did  the 
Mayas,  considered  a  straight  line  from  the  end  of 
the  nose  to  the  crown  of  the  head  a  prime  requisite 


218    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

in  facial  beauty,  to  obtain  which  a  process  was  set 
in  operation  shortly  after  the  child's  birth.  This 
process  usually  consisted  in  placing  the  child  on  its 
back  on  a  piece  of  flat  wood  with  the  head  slightly 
raised  by  means  of  a  block.  Another  piece  of  wood, 
or  preferably  bark,  was  placed  over  the  forehead 
and  fastened  to  that  on  which  the  child  lay  by  means 
of  senet  cords,  which  were  tightened  at  intervals 
until  the  head  had  assumed  the  desired  form. 
Among  all  of  these  peoples  a  round  head  was  con 
sidered  a  reproach. 

IMPLEMENTS  OF  WAR,  &c. 

Those  identified  with  the  Mediterranean  nations 
were  one  and  all  found  not  only  in  the  civilised  but 
among  the  uncivilised  races  of  the  American  Con 
tinent.  One  peculiar  weapon  clearly  identified  with 
the  Mediterranean  was  the  curved  throw-stick  or 
boomerang.  Its  antiquity  is  beyond  question,  for 
among  the  subjects  depicted  on  the  tombs,  the 
Egyptian  is  frequently  shown  going  into  the  marshes 
in  a  boat  accompanied  by  his  children  to  spear  the 
hippopotamus  or  knock  down  birds  with  the  curved 
throw-stick.  The  bow  and  arrow  were  in  general 
use  among  the  nations  of  America,  while  those  of 
Salvador  and  Nicaragua  were  so  expert  in  the  use 
of  the  sling  that  game  and  even  birds  on  the  wing 
were  secured  by  it. 

ARMIES 

The  armies  of  the  American  nations  were  li^e 
those  of  the  Asiatic  nations,  large,  well  drilled,  and 
fully  equipped.  They  usually  consisted  of  several 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  219 

divisions  numbering  8000  each,  divided  into  regular 
companies  commanded  by  captains  and  furnished 
with  standards.  In  warfare  the  attack  was  made  at 
a  distance  with  arrows,  slings,  and  javelins,  but  in 
the  hand-to-hand  fight  which  later  ensued,  dart, 
spear,  sword,  and  club  were  used.  The  arrows 
throughout  Mexico  and  Central  America  were  winged 
with  two  and  sometimes  three  feathers  and  pointed, 
as  were  the  spears,  with  bronze,  obsidian,  or  flint 
points  as  on  the  Mediterranean. 

GYMNASIA 

Among  the  Mediterranean  nations  it  was  usual 
to  train  in  the  gymnasium  those  fitted  for  a  mili 
tary  career.  This  system  also  existed  on  the 
Pacific  Islands,  and  was  likewise  common  among  the 
civilised  nations  of  America.  There  the  young  men 
were  not  only  trained  in  those  exercises  best  suited 
to  the  development  of  bodily  agility  but  to  the  use 
of  weapons  of  warfare. 

TOTEMISM 

As  we  have  already  shown,  totemism  on  the 
Mediterranean  basin  was  a  cult  of  Arian  extraction 
and  common  to  the  Egyptians,  Phoenicians,  Scy 
thians,  Greeks,  and  Romans,  and  to  some  limited 
extent  present  among  the  Jews.  It  was  a  cardinal 
feature  of  the  religious  cult  of  the  Phoenicians,  each 
tribe  or  family  being  named  after  its  own  totem,  an 
animal,  plant,  or  heavenly  body,  which  was  wor 
shipped  by  it  and  regarded  as  its  protecting  divinity. 
This  practice  also  prevailed  throughout  Central 
Polynesia  and  on  the  American  Continent  from 


220    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Alaska  to  Mexico.  Among  the  Samoans  the  child 
at  birth  was  supposed  to  be  taken  under  the  care 
of  some  particular  god  or  aitu.  Several  of  these 
were  invoked  in  succession  on  the  occasion,  the  one 
which  happened  to  be  addressed  as  the  child  was 
born  being  selected  as  the  child's  god  for  life.  These 
gods  were  supposed  to  make  their  appearance  in 
visible  form,  and  the  particular  thing  in  which  it 
was  believed  to  incarnate  was  to  the  individual  an 
object  of  religious  veneration. 

The  forms  in  which  these  aitus  were  supposed 
by  the  Samoans  to  incarnate  were  multitudinous, 
embracing  the  eel,  crab,  shark,  turtle,  lizard,  fish, 
dog,  owl,  &c.  If  the  individual  found  one  of  these 
in  which  he  supposed  his  particular  god  to  incarnate 
dead  on  the  roadside,  he  immediately  sat  down 
beside  it  and  began  to  weep,  beating  his  forehead 
until  the  blood  came,  an  act  which  was  believed  to 
be  pleasing  to  the  deity.  This  belief,  expressed  in 
almost  identical  form,  prevailed,  and,  to  some  ex 
tent,  exists  even  still  among  the  Zapotecs,  a  pre- 
Toltec  nation  of  Yucatan.  Prior  to  confinement 
the  relatives  of  the  woman  assembled  in  the  house 
and  commenced  to  draw  on  the  floor  figures  of 
different  animals,  rubbing  out  each  figure  as  soon 
as  it  was  completed.  This  was  continued  until  the 
moment  of  birth,  when  the  figure  that  remained  on 
the  floor  was  selected  as  the  child's  tona  or  guardian 
spirit,  it  being  obligatory  on  the  part  of  the  child, 
when  it  grew  up,  to  procure  one  of  the  species  which 
the  drawing  represented  and  care  for  it,  as  it  was 
believed  that  not  only  the  health  but  the  life  of  the 
individual  was  bound  up  with  that  of  the  totem. 

The  prevalence  of  totemism  on  the  American 
Continent  was  widespread.  Among  the  North 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  221 

American  Indians  the  tribes  when  on  the  march 
always  camped  together  in  separate  totem  clans. 
Like  the  Scythian  Neuri  and  the  Phoenicians,  these 
clans  believed  that  their  ancestors  sprang  from  the 
totem  and  that  at  death  they  resumed  the  totem 
form.  This  view  certainly  prevailed  among  the 
Moqui  Indians,  who,  believing  that  the  ancestors 
of  their  clans  were  respectively  rattlesnakes,  deer, 
bear,  &c.,  said  that  at  death  each  man  according  to 
his  tribe  became  one  of  these  animals.  This  belief 
was  not  confined  to  any  particular  locality.  Among 
the  northern  Omalia  Indians  the  dying  clansman, 
wrapped  in  a  buffalo  skin,  with  his  clan  totem 
painted  on  his  face,  was  invariably  addressed  by 
his  friends :  '  You  are  going  to  the  buffaloes ;  be 
brave,  be  strong/' 

This  was  peculiarly  a  Phoenician  belief,  for 
Cadmus,  the  son  of  Agenor,  king  of  Phoenicia,  the 
founder  of  Thebes,  who  introduced  the  sixteen 
letters  of  the  Phoenician  alphabet  into  Greece,  was 
accredited,  along  with  his  wife  Hamonia,  with  having 
been  transformed  at  death  into  the  totem  form  of 
the  serpent  tribe  to  which  they  belonged. 

TREE  AND  STONE  WORSHIP 

Among  the  Semites  sacrifices  were  not  originally 
burned,  nor  was  the  god  supposed  to  be  seated  aloft 
but  present  in  the  bactellium,  the  bethel  or  sacred 
stone  or  sacred  tree,  which  among  them  served  at 
once  as  the  later  altar  and  the  later  idol.  That 
this  form  of  belief  was  familiar  to  the  Polynesians 
is  clear,  for  we  have  shown  in  our  references  to  the 
cult  of  the  Areois  in  Tahiti  that  a  species  of  tree 
veneration  existed  there. 


222    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

The  belief  had  a  corresponding  place  in  the  re 
ligious  systems  of  the  early  Americans,  the  Miztecs 
and  Zapotecs,  two  ancient  branches  of  the  Mayas 
of  Yucatan  claiming  that  the  ancestors  of  their 
people  sprang  from  two  trees.  The  belief  also  pre 
vailed  in  other  parts  of  Central  America  and  in 
Mexico  where  cypresses  and  palms,  generally  in 
groups  of  three  within  the  temple  enclosures,  were 
tended  with  great  care  and  received  gifts  and  offer 
ings  of  incense. 

Nor  was  the  adoration  confined  to  trees.  The 
worship  of  stones,  more  especially  aerolites,  is 
equally  well  demonstrated.  Quetzalcoatt,  some 
times  identified  with  Votan,  the  culture  hero,  was 
represented  either  by  a  black  stone  or  several  small 
green  ones.  These  were  supposed  to  have  fallen 
from  heaven  and  were  adored  in  his  service. 

SUN  WORSHIP 

With  these  forms  of  belief  Phallus-worship  was 
clearly  identified  in  the  Old  World  centres  of  civil 
isation.  Indeed  in  most  mythologies  the  Sun,  as 
the  principle  of  fire,  the  Moon,  and  the  Earth  were 
always  associated  with  this  worship.  These  were 
the  parent  principles,  their  obvious  symbols  being 
the  Phallus  and  the  Kteis. 

So  widespread  was  the  cult  that  it  embraced  not 
only  India,  Egypt,  and  Phoenicia,  but  extended  to 
the  Greek  and  Latin  races.  It  was,  however, 
strictly  forbidden  to  the  Jews  (Num.  xxv.  3). 
Its  presence  in  the  Pacific  and  America  is  very 
apparent.  The  prevalence  of  sun  worship,  which 
was  always  intimately  connected  with  Phallicism, 
would  in  itself  go  very  far  to  prove  its  existence. 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  223 

But  we  are  not  dependent  on  such  evidence,  for 
Stephens  and  Catherwood,  Squires  and  the  Abbe 
Brasseur  de  Bourbourg,  all  of  whom  were  intimately 
familiar  with  the  monuments  of  Central  America, 
emphatically  testify  to  the  presence  of  the  cult 
among  the  peoples  of  the  civilised  states. 


MOLOCH 

According  to  Dr.  Dollinger  and  other  authorities 
the  image  of  Moloch  among  the  Phoenicians  was  a 
human  figure  with  a  bull's  head  and  outstretched 
arms.  This  image  during  periods  of  sacrifice  was 
made  red-hot  by  means  of  a  fire  kindled  within, 
and  the  victims  laid  in  its  arms  rolled  into  the  fiery 
furnace  below,  the  din  of  flutes  and  drums  drowning 
their  cries  while  they  were  being  consumed.  This 
system  of  sacrifice  was  also  found  in  identical  form 
among  the  ancient  Maya  races  of  Yucatan,  especi 
ally  among  the  Itzas,  one  of  the  most  ancient 
branches  of  this  nation.  The  chief  idol  of  the  Itzas 
was  Hubo,  and,  like  the  Phoenician  Moloch,  was 
represented  by  a  hollow  metal  figure,  half  human 
and  half  brute,  which  in  times  of  sacrifice  was 
heated  by  a  fire  kindled  within.  When  sufficiently 
hot  the  human  victims  were  passed  through  an 
opening  between  the  shoulders  into  the  fire  below, 
charged  to  implore  the  favour  of  the  gods.  Their 
cries,  as  they  were  being  roasted  to  death,  were 
drowned  by  the  beating  of  drums,  the  blowing  of 
horns,  and  the  shouts  of  the  assembled  friends, 
who  meanwhile  danced  around  the  image.  The 
correspondence  does  not,  however,  cease  here,  for 
in  the  temple  services  of  the  Itzas  to  Hubo,  as  in 


224    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

those  of  the  Phoenicians  to  Hercules,  women  were 
excluded  under  penalty  of  death. 

In  view  of  the  mass  of  evidence  which  has  been 
advanced  showing  the  striking  similarities  between 
the  Scythians,  Thracians,  and  the  Phoenicians  of 
the  Mediterranean  basin  and  the  peoples  occupying 
the  Pacific  States  of  America  it  would  be  superfluous 
to  continue  our  investigation  further. 

We  will  now  deal  with  the  evidence  proving  the 
presence  of  the  Hebrews  in  the  same  territory. 

MONOTHEISM 

The  one  central  feature  distinguishing  the 
Hebrew  religious  system  from  that  of  the  surround 
ing  nations  was  its  Monotheism  (2  Chron.  vi.  18). 
Around  this  great  central  concept  the  life  of  the 
Israelite  revolved.  During  the  earlier  and  purer 
period  of  the  Phoenician  history  the  monotheistic 
idea  seems  also  to  have  been  prevalent,  but  we  are 
unable  to  say  just  when  the  departure  from  the 
worship  of  one  central  divinity  to  that  of  his 
personified  attributes  took  place.  From  the  message 
of  Hiram  to  Solomon  (2  Chron.  ii.  n)  there  can  be 
no  doubt  that  at  the  date  of  the  joint  expeditions 
from  Eziongeber  it  still  held  a  prominent  place  in 
the  minds  of  the  ruling  and  priestly  classes. 

The  presence  of  such  a  belief  among  the  early 
inhabitants  of  the  Pacific  States  can  scarcely,  there 
fore,  in  view  of  what  has  already  been  said,  be 
considered  remarkable.  To  these  peoples  the 
highest  invisible  god  was  familiar  under  the  name 
of  Teoth.  The  more  advanced  school  of  Mexican 
cosmogony  always  ascribed  the  origin  of  this  idea 
to  the  ancient  Toltecs,  so  that  we  may  safely  enough 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  225 

assume  that  it  was  derived  from  the  teachings  of 
the  first  culture  hero.  This  school,  it  is  asserted, 
taught  that  all  things  had  been  created  by  one  God, 
invisible  and  omnipotent.  That  this  monotheistic 
idea  was  not  confined  to  the  earliest  period  is  ap 
parent,  for  all  the  writers  who  have  treated  the  later 
history  of  the  American  nations  authoritatively 
assure  us  that  at  the  time  when  the  Spaniards  landed 
on  the  continent  there  was  not  one  that  did  not 
recognise  the  existence  of  a  supreme  and  absolute 
Ruler  of  the  universe. 

It  is  quite  true  that  this  in  itself  would  not 
demonstrate  the  presence  of  the  Hebrew  in  America, 
nor  is  this  fact,  unsupported,  offered  as  evidence  of 
it,  but  in  connection  with  the  data  to  be  submitted 
it  will,  we  believe,  demonstrate  this  fact  beyond  a 
doubt.  It  will  also  be  shown  that  the  influence 
behind  this  monotheistic  idea  must  have  been  a 
dominating  one  since  it  was  sufficiently  powerful 
to  have  survived  throughout  long  centuries  of 
isolation. 

While  all  the  early  traditions  of  the  human  race 
were  held  in  common  by  the  peoples  who  migrated 
from  the  Mesopotamian  plains,  still  among  none  of 
them  have  they  survived  in  the  same  pristine  purity 
as  among  the  Hebrews. 

If,  therefore,  we  keep  the  Jewish  text  promi 
nently  before  us  we  should  have  little  difficulty  in 
determining  the  source  from  which  corresponding 
traditions  found  among  the  native  races  of  the 
Pacific  States  were  derived,  for  in  most  instances 
they  will  be  found  to  follow  the  Hebrew  text 
almost  verbatim  et  literatim. 

The  story  of  the  creation  of  mankind  follows  the 
Hebrew  text  much  more  closely  in  the  Pacific  than 

p 


226    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

it  does  on  the  American  Continent.  This  is  not 
the  case,  however,  with  that  of  the  Flood.  Nearly 
all  the  painted  manuscripts  found  among  the 
Mexicans,  the  Tlascaltecs,  Zapotecs,  Meztecs,  and 
Michoacans  invariably  depict  a  man  and  woman 
seated  in  a  boat  floating  over  a  waste  of  waters. 
According  to  the  Mexican  tradition  only  one  man 
and  one  woman  escaped  the  catastrophe,  and  these 
saved  themselves  in  the  hollow  trunk  of  a  cypress 
tree,  the  name  of  the  man  being  Cox  Cox  and  that 
of  his  wife  Xochi quetzal.  The  ark,  according  to 
this  tradition,  is  said  to  have  grounded  on  the  Peak 
of  Coluacan,  the  Ararat  of  Mexico,  where  the  man 
and  his  wife  multiplied  and  increased,  their  children 
being  all  born  dumb.  This  calamity  was  nullified 
by  the  advent  of  a  dove,  which  brought  to  them 
tongues  innumerable,  so  that  only  fifteen  of  the 
descendants  of  Cox  Cox  could  understand  each 
other,  but  these  became  the  heads  of  families,  and 
from  them  were  descended  the  Toltecs,  Aztecs,  and 
Acolhua  nations. 

This  Michoacan  account  more  closely  corres 
ponds  to  the  Hebrew  text.  In  it  Tezpi  is  credited 
with  having  constructed  a  spacious  vessel  in  which 
he  not  only  saved  himself  and  his  family  but  also 
his  children,  together  with  several  animals  and  grain 
sufficient  for  their  common  support.  The  corres 
pondence  does  not,  however,  cease  here,  for,  accord 
ing  to  this  tradition,  when  the  waters  began  to 
subside,  Tezpi  sent  out  a  vulture  that  it  might  re 
turn  when  the  dry  land  appeared  and  bring  him 
word.  Finding  abundant  food  in  the  carcases 
floating  in  every  direction  the  vulture  did  not  return, 
and  Tezpi  sent  out  other  birds  and,  among  them, 
a  species  of  humming-bird  which,  when  the  sun 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  227 

began  to  cover  the  earth  with  verdure,  came  back 
to  Tezpi  bearing  leaves  in  its  bill.  This  tradi 
tion  locates  the  spot  where  the  vessel  grounded  in 
the  mountains  of  Cothnacan,  and  there,  it  is  said, 
Tezpi  and  his  family  disembarked. 

The  tradition  most  closely  corresponding  to  the 
Hebrew  and  Chaldaean  story  of  the  building  of  the 
Tower  of  Babel  is  found  in  Mexico  and  is  said  to  be 
of  pre-Toltec  origin,  from  which  we  presume  it  is 
necessary  to  associate  it  with  the  culture  heroes. 

According  to  this  account  Xelhua,  a  giant  sur- 
named  the  Architect,  went  to  Cholula  immediately 
after  the  Flood  and  began  the  erection  of  an  arti 
ficial  mountain  as  a  memorial  of  thanksgiving  to 
the  god  Tlatoc,  who  had  saved  him  and  his  family 
from  the  devastation  which  had  swept  over  the 
land.  The  tradition  goes  on  to  say  that  the  bricks 
necessary  for  the  erection  of  this  structure  were 
made  at  Talamanalco  at  the  foot  of  the  Sierra  de 
Cocoth  Mountains,  and  passed  from  hand  to  hand 
along  a  file  of  men  that  stretched  from  the  Kilns 
to  Cholula.  As,  however,  the  pyramid  rose  slowly 
towards  the  heavens  the  jealousy  and  anger  of  the 
gods  was  aroused,  and  they  launched  fire  from  the 
clouds  which  killed  so  many  of  the  builders  that 
the  work  was  stopped. 

Passing  now  to  a  consideration  of  further  evi 
dence  found  in  the  territory  pointing  to  Hebraic 
occupation  we  find  traces  of  laws  corresponding 
in  some  measure  to  those  that  were  identified  in 
an  exclusive  way  with  the  Hebrews.  Moreover,  the 
methods  of  inflicting  the  penalties  attached  to  their 
infraction  were  of  such  a  character  that  it  is  im 
possible  to  err  in  relating  them  to  Hebraic  sources. 

We  have  already  referred  to  the  presence  of  the 


228    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

rite  of  circumcision  in  the  Pacific  as  forming  part 
of  that  cumulative  evidence  which  enables  us  to 
determine  the  route  pursued  by  the  expeditions  of 
Hiram  and  Solomon  on  their  way  to  Ophir  (i  Kings 
ix.  28).  It  is  undoubtedly  true  that  the  practice 
of  circumcision  is  much  better  attested  among  the 
later  Nahuas  and  Aztecs  than  it  is  among  the  Mayas. 
But  the  rite  does  not  seem  to  have  been  in  general 
use  among  the  Nahuas  and  Aztecs,  which  may  be 
explained  by  the  very  mixed  constituents  of  the 
imported  civilisation.  That  it  was  practised,  how 
ever,  in  the  early  seats  of  civilisation  is  well  attested 
by  Las  Casas,  Mendiota,  and  Brasseur  de  Bourbourg. 

LEGAL  SYSTEM 

In  order  that  the  law  among  the  Jews  might  be 
applied  with  the  strictest  impartiality  instructions 
of  the  most  rigorous  character  were  given  by  Moses 
to  the  judges  (Deut.  i.  17).  The  sense  of  justice 
was  also  particularly  keen  among  the  Aztecs.  One 
of  the  most  notable  characteristics  of  their  monarchs 
was  their  efforts  to  secure  justice.  The  need  for  it 
was  impressed  upon  the  king  in  the  most  serious 
manner  at  his  coronation.  The  consequence  was 
that  the  Aztec  laws  were  severe  in  the  extreme. 
No  favouritism  was  shown,  all  alike,  from  the 
highest  to  the  lowest,  being  made  amenable  to  them. 

In  order  that  they  might  be  protected  from 
temptation  to  malfeasance  the  judges  were  ap 
pointed  to  the  position  for  life.  None  were  eligible 
who  were  not  sober  and  upright.  A  judge  who 
was  known  to  have  been  intoxicated  was,  on  the 
first  occasion,  severely  reprimanded  by  his  fellow 
judges,  but  on  a  repetition  of  his  offence  his  head 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  229 

was  shaved  in  public  and  he  was  deprived  of  his 
office.  If  he  was  found  guilty  of  making  a  false 
report  of  the  business  transacted  in  his  court  to  the 
king,  or  convicted  of  taking  a  bribe  or  rendering 
an  unjust  decision,  he  was  promptly  punished  with 
death. 

In  order  that  the  administration  of  the  law  might 
receive  due  weight  it  was  surrounded  with  the 
necessary  pomp  and  circumstance.  The  two  most 
important  tribunals  of  the  Nahua  nation  were  held  in 
the  palace  of  the  king,  a  large  quadrangular  building 
enclosing  two  open  courtyards,  the  largest  of  which 
was  used  as  a  market-place  over  which  a  regular 
judicial  tribunal  presided,  and  to  which  was  carried 
for  adjustment  all  disputes  that  arose  in  the  con 
duct  of  the  day's  business.  The  smaller  court  was 
situated  in  the  interior  of  the  palace,  and  was  de 
voted  to  the  consideration  of  cases  of  a  more  com 
plex  character.  In  the  court  a  fire  was  kept  per 
petually  burning.  Here  the  two  principal  tribunals 
of  the  kingdom  were  situated.  The  highest  of  these 
courts  was  on  the  right-hand  of  the  palace  as  one 
entered  the  gateway.  In  the  interior  was  a  throne 
of  gold  studded  with  turquoises,  emeralds,  and  other 
precious  stones,  and  on  a  stool  which  stood  in  front 
of  the  throne  were  arranged  a  shield,  or  heavy 
double-handed  sword  of  justice,  with  a  row  of  sharp 
flints  set  along  the  edges,  a  bow  with  a  quiver  of 
arrows,  a  skull  surmounted  with  an  emerald  of 
pyramidal  shape,  in  which  was  inserted  a  plume 
of  feathers,  and  along  with  these  precious  stones 
and  other  insignia  of  law  and  royalty.  The  walls 
of  the  court,  according  to  Prescott,  were  hung  with 
rare  tapestries  manufactured  from  the  hair  of 
various  animals  of  rich  and  varied  colours  and 


230    THE    PHCEN1CIANS    AND    AMERICA 

lavishly  embroidered  with  figures  of  birds  and 
flowers.  This  tribunal  was  called  the  Tribunal  of 
God. 

The  inferior  tribunal  called  that  of  the  king  also 
contained  a  throne  but  of  lower  height.  It  was 
adorned  with  a  canopy  which  bore  the  royal  coat-of- 
arms.  In  this  court  the  ordinary  business  of  the 
king  was  transacted,  and  there  he  gave  audiences. 
When  decisions  were  to  be  given  in  important  cases, 
or  when  it  was  necessary  to  impose  sentence  of 
death,  the  court  proceeded  to  the  Tribunal  of  God. 
In  passing  judgment  there  the  king  ascended  the 
throne,  put  on  the  golden  tiara,  which  resembled  a 
half  mitre,  placed  his  right  hand  on  the  skull  and 
with  his  left  hand  held  aloft  the  golden  arrow, 
which  among  the  Nahuas  served  as  a  sceptre. 

In  another  hall  adjoining  these  two  supreme 
tribunals  were  held  subsidiary  courts.  In  the  inner 
and  principal  of  the  two  divisions  was  a  tribunal 
presided  over  by  eight  judges,  one-half  of  whom 
were  nobles  and  gentlemen  and  the  other  half 
citizens.  The  outer  division  was  occupied  by  a 
higher  court  composed  of  four  superior  judges  called 
the  Presidents  of  the  Council,  and  between  this 
court  and  that  presided  over  by  the  king  was  a 
wicket  so  arranged  that  the  judges  could  pass 
through  and  refer  to  him  all  difficult  cases  (Deut. 
i.  17). 

Perjury  in  all  these  courts  was  punishable  by 
death,  and  not  only  was  it  expressly  forbidden  to 
a  judge  to  receive  even  the  most  trivial  present 
from  the  litigants,  but  the  violation  of  this  law  was 
accompanied  by  deposition  from  office  and  the  in 
fliction  of  other  exceedingly  rigorous  punishments. 

That  this  judicial  system  was  derived  from  the 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  231 

Hebrews  there  can  be  no  question.  The  name 
Hebrew  is  written  in  very  legible  character  across 
its  face.  It  will,  therefore,  be  profitable  to  examine 
the  Scripture  narrative  somewhat  closely  with  a 
view  to  seeing  what  light  it  sheds  on  the  problem. 

In  Exodus  xviii.  15  Moses,  in  explaining  to  his 
father-in-law  the  reasons  why  he  personally  per 
formed  the  onerous  duties  of  judge  to  the  people, 
said  that  he  did  so  solely  on  account  of  his  familiarity 
with  the  statutes  of  Jehovah  and  his  desire  to 
communicate  them  to  the  people.  The  office  was, 
however,  too  arduous  for  one  man  to  continue  to 
sustain  without  suitable  support,  and  Jethro,  solici 
tous  for  the  welfare  of  his  son-in-law  and  not  less  so 
for  the  honest  administration  of  the  law,  counselled 
Moses  to  alter  his  system  and  appoint  a  many- 
centred  Court  of  Appeal  to  adjust  minor  differences 
and  offences,  and  to  confine  his  attention  to  the  more 
important  ones  in  which  it  was  necessary  for  him 
to  stand  in  the  place  of  God  to  the  people.  That 
this  was  the  system  in  use  among  the  Nahua  nations 
is  apparent  on  the  face  of  it. 

The  laws  relating  to  gluttony,  drunkenness,  and 
honour  to  parents  were  fundamental  among  the 
Jews,  and  were  clearly  and  explicitly  stated,  as  were 
the  punishments  attached  to  their  infraction.  As 
these  had  no  exact  counterpart  among  the  other 
nations  of  the  period  it  will  be  profitable  to  give 
some  attention  to  them,  more  especially  as  they 
will  be  found  to  be  identical  with  those  in  operation 
among  the  Nahua  nations  of  America. 

In  Deuteronomy  v.  16  the  Hebraic  law  reads, 
"  Honour  thy  father  and  thy  mother,  as  the  Lord 
thy  God  hath  commanded  thee,  that  thy  days  may 
be  prolonged  and  that  it  may  go  well  with  thee  in 


232    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

the  land  which  the  Lord  thy  God  giveth  thee." 
This,  again,  is  supplemented  in  Deuteronomy  xxi. 
1 8  with  very  stringent  regulations  as  to  the  punish 
ment  of  disobedience  to  parents,  gluttony,  and 
drunkenness,  and  reads  as  follows  :  "  If  a  man  have 
a  stubborn  and  rebellious  son  which  will  not  obey 
the  voice  of  his  father  or  the  voice  of  his  mother, 
and  that  when  they  have  chastened  him  will  not 
hearken  unto  them,  then  shall  his  father  and  his 
mother  lay  hold  on  him  and  bring  him  out  unto 
the  elders  of  the  city  and  unto  the  gate  of  his 
place.  And  they  shall  say  unto  the  elders  of  the 
city :  This  our  son  is  stubborn  and  rebellious,  he 
will  not  obey  our  voice,  he  is  a  glutton  and  a 
drunkard.  And  all  the  men  of  his  city  shall  stone 
him  with  stones  till  he  die,  so  shalt  thou  put  away 
evil  from  among  you  and  all  Israel  shall  hear  and 
fear." 

The  counterpart  of  these  laws  is  found  among 
the  Nahua  nations  and  were  derived  from  the 
Mayas.  The  son  who  raised  his  hand  against  his 
father  or  mother  not  only  suffered  death,  but  his 
children  were  debarred  from  inheriting  the  property 
of  their  grandparents.  The  law  of  gluttony  and 
drunkenness  was  enforced  with  equal  strictness. 
The  young  man  found  drunk  was  conveyed  to  jail 
and  there  beaten  to  death  with  clubs,  while  the 
young  woman  who  so  disgraced  herself  and  parents 
according  to  a  more  literal  interpretation  of  the 
Jewish  law  was  stoned  to  death. 

The  law  of  material  evidence  bulked  very  largely 
in  the  Jewish  code,  and  seems  to  have  held  a  corres 
ponding  place  in  that  of  Egypt,  as  may  be  seen  by 
reference  to  Genesis  xxxix.  13  and  Exodus  xxii.  4. 
This  law  had  a  like  prominence  among  the  Maya 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  233 

nations.  It  was  deemed  of  great  importance  there 
to  take  the  thief  while  in  actual  possession  of  the 
stolen  property,  while  to  secure  judgment  against 
a  man  accused  of  rape  it  was  necessary  for  the 
prosecutrix  to  seize  and  produce  in  court  some 
portion  of  the  offender's  wearing  apparel. 

There  is  again  the  same  startling  similarity  in 
the  Jewish  and  Aztec  laws  regarding  theft.  Among 
the  Jews  it  was  required  of  a  man  that  stole  an  ox 
or  a  sheep  and  killed  it  that  he  return  five  oxen  for 
an  ox  and  four  sheep  for  a  sheep,  but  in  the  event 
of  his  having  nothing  then  he  was  sold  for  his  theft 
and  restitution  made  from  the  proceeds  of  the  sale 
(Exod.  xxii.  i).  If,  on  the  other  hand,  he  stole 
money  or  goods  the  thief  was  required  to  pay 
double,  or  if  the  goods  were  found  in  his  possession 
alive,  whether  ox,  ass,  or  sheep,  he  was  required  to 
pay  double  (Exod.  xxii.  9). 

According  to  Ortega  the  petty  thief  among  the 
Aztecs  was  considered  the  slave  of  the  person  from 
whom  he  had  stolen,  yet  the  injured  party  had  the 
privilege  of  refusing  to  accept  the  thhf  as  his  slave, 
and  in  such  cases  he  was  sold  by  the  judge  and  the 
complainant  was  reimbursed  from  the  proceeds  of 
the  sale.  In  cases  where  a  compromise  was  effected 
the  thief  was  not  only  required  to  reimburse  the 
injured  party  for  his  loss,  but  to  pay  into  the  court 
treasury  an  equal  sum  which  was  tantamount  to 
the  Hebraic  law  of  paying  back  double  the  amount 
stolen. 

The  Levitical  law  regulating  business  trans 
actions  was  not  less  stringent  than  that  which 
affected  the  public  at  large.  According  to  Torque- 
mada  there  was  in  each  market-place  a  commercial 
tribunal  which  seems  to  have  been  similar  in  its 


234    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

purposes  to  that  referred  to  by  Herodotus  (ii.  178) 
as  existing  in  Naucratis  in  northern  Egypt.  This 
tribunal  among  the  Nahuas  was  presided  over  by 
twelve  judges  who  regulated  both  measures  and 
prices.  Guards  under  their  authority  constantly 
patrolled  the  markets  to  prevent  disorder,  any 
attempt  at  extortion  or  palming  off  inferior  goods 
on  the  purchaser,  or  taking  advantage  of  the  seller, 
discovered  by  them  being  at  once  reported  to  the 
judges,  who  not  only  punished  severely  all  offenders, 
but  even  inflicted  the  death  penalty  in  flagrant  cases. 

Among  the  Hebrews  both  in  the  earlier  and  later 
periods,  as  may  be  seen  by  reference  to  Genesis  xx. 
12  and  2  Samuel  xiii.  13,  marriage  to  a  sister  was 
allowable  provided  the  relationship  was  on  the 
father's  side  only.  This  custom,  curiously  enough, 
prevailed  also  in  the  early  American  civilised  states. 
Among  the  Guatemalans  the  same  permission  was 
given,  provided  only  that  the  woman  was  sister  by 
a  different  father,  no  relationship  on  the  mother's 
side  being  recognised  among  them. 

More  curious  still  was  the  existence  in  the 
civilised  states  of  the  Hebraic  law  which  compelled 
a  man  to  marry  his  deceased  brother's  widow  in  the 
event  of  there  being  no  issue.  The  Hebraic  law  on 
this  point  was  very  explicit  :  "If  brethren  dwell 
together,  and  one  of  them  die,  and  have  no  child, 
the  wife  of  the  dead  man  shall  not  marry  without 
unto  a  stranger :  her  husband's  brother  shall  go  in 
unto  her  and  take  her  to  him  to  wife,  and  perform 
the  duty  of  an  husband's  brother  unto  her,  and  the 
first-born  shall  succeed  to  the  name  of  his  brother 
who  is  dead,  that  his  name  be  not  put  out  of  Israel  " 
(Deut.  xxv.  5). 

This  law  was  not  instituted  for  the  protection  of 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  235 

the  Hebrew  people  during  the  sojourn  in  the  wilder 
ness  solely,  but  was  a  prominent  feature  of  the 
national  polity  during  its  entire  career. 

Among  the  early  civilised  American  races  this 
law  was  also  in  operation. 

This  obligation  to  marry  the  childless  widow  it 
will, however,  be  remembered  was  among  the  Hebrews 
not  confined  to  a  surviving  brother  but  extended 
to  the  nearest  surviving  kinsman  (Deut.  xxv.  5). 
The  story  of  Ruth,  the  Moabitess,  centres  in  the 
application  of  this  law,  Boaz,  the  ultimate  husband, 
being  unable  to  marry  the  young  widow  until  the 
claims  of  a  nearer  kinsman  had  been  legally  set 
aside.  A  similar  law  existed  among  the  ancient 
Maya  races  of  Central  America.  There  a  widow  was 
invariably  married  to  the  brother  of  the  deceased 
husband,  and  that  even  in  the  event  of  his  having 
a  wife  of  his  own  living  at  the  time,  the  widow  being 
considered  the  property  of  the  dead  man's  family. 
The  analogy  can  be  carried  even  further.  The  obli 
gation  to  marry  the  widow  there,  as  in  Palestine, 
was  not  confined  to  a  surviving  brother  but  ex 
tended,  as  among  the  Hebrews,  to  the  nearest  sur 
viving  male  relative  on  the  husband's  side. 

Concubinage,  it  is  needless  to  say,  was  common 
among  the  Hebrews,  not  only  in  the  earlier  period  but 
in  the  most  extraordinary  form,  during  the  reign  of 
Solomon  who,  according  to  i  Kings  xi.  3,  had  seven 
hundred  wives  and  three  hundred  concubines  who 
turned  away  his  heart  from  the  service  of  God. 

Throughout  the  Mexican  empire  concubines  were 
not  only  permitted  but  regulated  by  law.  Among 
the  Nahua  nations  concubines  were  divided  into 
three  classes,  nor  was  the  usage  confined  to  the 
common  people,  but  found  the  widest  field  for  its 


238    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

to  i  Chronicles  xxiii.  i  and  I  Kings  ii.  14,  where  it 
will  be  seen  that  Solomon,  the  youngest  son,  was 
chosen  in  place  of  Adonijah,  the  eldest. 

During  the  period,  likewise,  the  custom  seems  to 
have  been  adopted  of  training  the  chosen  heir  for 
the  functions  of  the  kingly  office  while  the  old 
monarch  was  still  alive. 

There  may  be  room  for  difference  of  opinion  as 
to  the  origin  of  such  a  system  of  government,  but 
if  we  follow  the  Scripture  narrative  there  can  be 
no  question  that  the  system  of  government  was  the 
outgrowth  of  two  factors — first,  the  explicit  instruc 
tions  of  God  to  David  that  Solomon  should  succeed 
him  on  the  throne  of  Israel,  and  second,  the  solicitous 
desire  of  David  to  carry  out  these  instructions  in 
such  a  way  that  Solomon  would  be  firmly  established 
on  the  throne  before  his  demise.  In  i  Chronicles 
xxvih.  5  this  is  clearly  set  forth,  for  there  David 
says  :  "Of  all  my  sons  the  Lord  hath  chosen 
Solomon  to  sit  upon  the  throne  of  the  Kingdom  of 
the  Lord  over  Israel/'  a  statement  that  receives 
corroboration  not  only  in  the  complaint  of  Adonijah 
(i  Kings  ii.  14)  that  the  kingdom  was  his  and  that 
all  Israel  had  set  their  faces  on  him  that  he  should 
reign  over  them,  but  in  i  Chronicles  xxiii.  i,  where  it 
states  explicitly  that  "  When  David  was  old  and  full 
of  days  he  made  Solomon,  his  son,  king  over  Israel." 

Anointing  and  coronation  among  the  Hebrews 
seem  in  consequence  of  this  departure  to  have  been 
two  separate  ceremonies  among  them.  Not  only 
was  Solomon  anointed  by  Zadok  the  priest  and 
Nathan  the  prophet  (i  Kings  i.  39)  during  the  life 
of  David,  when  he  temporarily  took  up  the  reins  of 
office,  but  a  second  time  on  his  regular  accession  to 
the  throne  on  the  death  of  his  father  (i  Chron.  xxix. 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  239 

22).  On  the  accession  of  the  Hebrew  monarch  to 
the  throne  it  was,  moreover,  obligatory  for  the 
princes  of  the  royal  house,  the  generals  of  the  army, 
the  governors  of  the  provinces,  and  all  high  in 
authority  to  proceed  to  the  royal  palace  and  swear 
allegiance  to  him,  none  of  these  being  permitted, 
under  the  most  severe  penalties,  to  absent  himself 
from  the  ceremony  (i  Chron.  xxix.  24). 

Among  the  Nahua  nations  the  order  of  royal 
succession  as  among  the  Hebrews  was  lineal  and  here 
ditary.  The  reigning  king,  however,  always  retained 
the  right  to  select  from  among  his  sons  the  one  whom 
he  thought  best  fitted  to  govern.  In  order,  how 
ever,  that  no  mistake  might  be  made  in  the  selection 
it  was  customary  for  the  Nahua  king,  when  he  felt 
that  his  end  was  drawing  near,  to  place  on  the  throne, 
as  David  did  Solomon,  the  son  whom  he  had  selected 
in  order  to  familiarise  him  with  the  routine  of  govern 
ment  under  his  personal  direction.  The  chosen 
heir,  therefore,  really  began  his  reign  from  the  date 
of  his  appointment. 

The  ceremony  of  anointing  among  the  Nahuas 
likewise  always  preceded  and  was  distinct  from 
that  of  coronation.  The  de  facto  king  despatched 
messengers  throughout  the  kingdom  when  the  old 
monarch  grew  sick,  summoning  the  nobles  and 
grandees  of  the  kingdom  to  repair  at  once  to  the 
capital  and  swear  allegiance  to  him,  no  one  being 
permitted  to  absent  himself  under  the  most  severe 
penalties. 

REMOVAL  OF  LANDMARKS 

Removal  of  landmarks  among  the  Hebrews  was 
a  heinous  offence.  "  Cursed  be  the  man/'  said  the 


240    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Hebraic  law,  "  that  removeth  his  neighbour's  land 
mark  "  (Deut.  xxvii.  17).  This  law  was  equally 
drastic  in  Central  America,  for  in  Mexico  he  who  by 
force  took  possession  of  another's  land  or  removed 
his  neighbour's  landmark  was  summarily  put  to 
death. 

SORCERY 

Sorcery  was  forbidden  to  the  Hebrews.  "  The 
man  or  woman  that  hath  a  familiar  spirit,  or  is 
a  wizard,  shall  surely  be  put  to  death :  they  shall 
stone  them  with  stones,  their  blood  shall  be  upon 
them"  (Lev.  xx.  27). 

This  law  was  also  in  effect  in  the  civilised  states 
of  America,  for,  according  to  Ximenes,  the  balam 
or  sorcerer  in  Guatemala  was  burned,  and,  according 
to  Torquemada,  the  same  offence  in  Verapaz  caused 
the  guilty  party  either  to  be  beaten  to  death  with 
clubs  or  hanged. 

SLAVERY 

Among  the  Hebrews  slavery  seems  to  have  been  a 
very  mild  institution  amounting  to  little  more  than 
a  moderate  subjection,  which  was  not  allowed  to 
interfere  with  the  slave  possessing  sufficient  time 
in  which  to  work  for  his  own  advantage  and  the 
support  of  those  dependent  on  him.  Scripture 
(Exod.  xxi.  2  and  Lev.  xxv.  39)  leaves  no  room 
for  doubt  on  this  point.  The  case  can,  however,  be 
better  understood  by  reference  to  the  institution 
during  the  reign  of  Solomon,  when  the  assistance 
to  be  secured  from  the  subject  people  was  ascer 
tained  by  numbering  all  the  strangers  in  the  land, 
and,  as  these  were  found  to  amount  to  153,600, 
they  were  apportioned  to  the  work  in  three  sections 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  241 

of  51,800  each,  who  laboured  one  month  in  Lebanon 
and  were  two  months  at  home  (i  Kings  v.  14). 

These  strangers  were  the  Amorites,  Hittites, 
Perisites,  and  Jebusites  left  in  the  promised  land  after 
its  occupancy  by  the  Hebrews  on  whom  was  levied 
a  tribute  of  bondservice.  The  Hebrews  were  exhorted 
to  treat  these  subject  people  with  great  considera 
tion  and  to  remember  that  they  and  their  forefathers 
had  been  bondservants  in  Egypt  (Deut.  xv.  12). 

The  Phoenicians  were  the  great  slave  dealers  of 
the  ancient  world,  and  slavery  among  them  was  a 
very  different  institution  from  what  it  was  among 
the  Israelites.  The  population  of  Tyre,  indeed,  at 
the  period  of  its  destruction  by  Alexander  the  Great 
is  said  to  have  included  some  30,000  of  these  unfor 
tunates,  whose  average  value  of  £3  per  head  was 
assessed  at  little  more  than  that  of  ordinary  cattle. 

In  the  ancient  states  of  America  slavery  was 
an  institution  of  considerable  importance.  The 
chief  slave  market  seems  to  have  been  in  Azapazalco. 
Slavery  was  an  immensely  profitable  business,  for 
the  trades,  with  a  view  to  advantageous  sales,  are 
said  to  have  fed  and  clothed  those  about  to  be  ex 
posed  in  the  public  markets,  and  to  have  encouraged 
them  to  dance  and  look  cheerful  with  a  view  to 
securing  good  masters. 

Slavery  in  Mexico  was,  as  among  the  Hebrews, 
little  more  than  an  obligation  to  render  a  certain 
amount  of  personal  service  when  this  was  demanded. 
But  it  would  seem  that  this  could  not  be  exacted 
without  allowing  the  slave  a  certain  amount  of  time 
in  which  to  labour  for  his  own  advantage  and  the  sup 
port  of  those  dependent  on  him.  Slavery,  however, 
was  not  altogether  of  this  patriarchal  character 
among  the  peoples  of  the  civilised  states  of  America, 

Q 


240    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND   AMERICA 

Hebraic  law,  "  that  removeth  his  neighbour's  land 
mark  "  (Deut.  xxvii.  17).  This  law  was  equally 
drastic  in  Central  America,  for  in  Mexico  he  who  by 
force  took  possession  of  another's  land  or  removed 
his  neighbour's  landmark  was  summarily  put  to 
death. 

SORCERY 

Sorcery  was  forbidden  to  the  Hebrews.  "  The 
man  or  woman  that  hath  a  familiar  spirit,  or  is 
a  wizard,  shall  surely  be  put  to  death :  they  shall 
stone  them  with  stones,  their  blood  shall  be  upon 
them"  (Lev.  xx.  27). 

This  law  was  also  in  effect  in  the  civilised  states 
of  America,  for,  according  to  Ximenes,  the  balam 
or  sorcerer  in  Guatemala  was  burned,  and,  according 
to  Torquemada,  the  same  offence  in  Verapaz  caused 
the  guilty  party  either  to  be  beaten  to  death  with 
clubs  or  hanged. 

SLAVERY 

Among  the  Hebrews  slavery  seems  to  have  been  a 
very  mild  institution  amounting  to  little  more  than 
a  moderate  subjection,  which  was  not  allowed  to 
interfere  with  the  slave  possessing  sufficient  time 
in  which  to  work  for  his  own  advantage  and  the 
support  of  those  dependent  on  him.  Scripture 
(Exod.  xxi.  2  and  Lev.  xxv.  39)  leaves  no  room 
for  doubt  on  this  point.  The  case  can,  however,  be 
better  understood  by  reference  to  the  institution 
during  the  reign  of  Solomon,  when  the  assistance 
to  be  secured  from  the  subject  people  was  ascer 
tained  by  numbering  all  the  strangers  in  the  land, 
and,  as  these  were  found  to  amount  to  153,600, 
they  were  apportioned  to  the  work  in  three  sections 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  241 

of  51,800  each,  who  laboured  one  month  in  Lebanon 
and  were  two  months  at  home  (i  Kings  v.  14). 

These  strangers  were  the  Amorites,  Hittites, 
Perisites,  and  Jebusites  left  in  the  promised  land  after 
its  occupancy  by  the  Hebrews  on  whom  was  levied 
a  tribute  of  bondservice.  The  Hebrews  were  exhorted 
to  treat  these  subject  people  with  great  considera 
tion  and  to  remember  that  they  and  their  forefathers 
had  been  bondservants  in  Egypt  (Deut.  xv.  12). 

The  Phoenicians  were  the  great  slave  dealers  of 
the  ancient  world,  and  slavery  among  them  was  a 
very  different  institution  from  what  it  was  among 
the  Israelites.  The  population  of  Tyre,  indeed,  at 
the  period  of  its  destruction  by  Alexander  the  Great 
is  said  to  have  included  some  30,000  of  these  unfor 
tunates,  whose  average  value  of  £3  per  head  was 
assessed  at  little  more  than  that  of  ordinary  cattle. 

In  the  ancient  states  of  America  slavery  was 
an  institution  of  considerable  importance.  The 
chief  slave  market  seems  to  have  been  in  Azapazalco. 
Slavery  was  an  immensely  profitable  business,  for 
the  trades,  with  a  view  to  advantageous  sales,  are 
said  to  have  fed  and  clothed  those  about  to  be  ex 
posed  in  the  public  markets,  and  to  have  encouraged 
them  to  dance  and  look  cheerful  with  a  view  to 
securing  good  masters. 

Slavery  in  Mexico  was,  as  among  the  Hebrews, 
little  more  than  an  obligation  to  render  a  certain 
amount  of  personal  service  when  this  was  demanded. 
But  it  would  seem  that  this  could  not  be  exacted 
without  allowing  the  slave  a  certain  amount  of  time 
in  which  to  labour  for  his  own  advantage  and  the  sup 
port  of  those  dependent  on  him.  Slavery,  however, 
was  not  altogether  of  this  patriarchal  character 
among  the  peoples  of  the  civilised  states  of  America, 

Q 


242    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

for  we  learn  from  the  ancient  records  that  slaves 
who  were  neither  prisoners  of  war,  deformed  persons, 
nor  criminals  were  in  some  cases  put  to  death  in  large 
numbers.  But  this  difference  in  the  treatment  of 
slaves  does  not  hinder  but  rather  helps  us  to  under 
stand  the  source  from  which  the  American  insti 
tution  was  derived.  It  was  neither  Jewish  nor 
Phoenician  but  a  conjunction  of  both. 

MAN  STEALING 

Among  the  Jews  man  stealing  was  a  capital 
offence.  The  law  on  this  point  was  explicit — "  If 
any  man  be  found  stealing  away  one  of  his  brethren 
of  the  children  of  Israel  and  making  merchandise 
of  him  and  selling  him,  that  thief  shall  die,  and  thou 
shalt  put  away  the  evil  from  among  you  "  (Deut. 
xxiv.  7 ;  Exod.  xxi.  16).  The  parallel  to  this 
law  was  found  operative  in  the  Central  American 
States,  for,  according  to  Las  Casas,  the  crime  of 
kidnapping,  while  common  in  Guatemala,  was  pun 
ished  with  great  severity.  He  who  sold  a  free  native 
into  slavery  was  clubbed  to  death,  while  in  Texcuco 
the  man  who  kidnapped  a  child  and  sold  it  into 
slavery  was  hanged. 

The  redemption  of  slaves  among  the  Jews  was 
explicitly  provided  for,  perpetual  bondage,  unless 
deliberately  chosen  by  the  slave,  being  forbidden 
(Exod.  xxi.  6)  :  "  If  a  sojourner  or  stranger  wax  rich 
by  thee,  and  thy  brother  that  dwelleth  by  him  wax 
poor,  and  sell  himself  unto  the  sojourner  or  stranger 
by  thee,  or  to  the  stock  of  the  stranger's  family : 
after  that  he  is  sold  he  may  be  redeemed  again  ; 
one  of  his  brethren  may  redeem  him  "  (Lev.  xxv. 
47).  The  humane  provision  for  the  redemption  of 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  243 

the  slave  was  likewise  provided  for  among  the  ancient 
Mayas,  for  while,  as  in  Palestine,  it  was  permissible 
for  a  father  to  sell  himself  or  his  children  into  slavery 
when  circumstances  compelled,  in  Nicaragua  the 
slave  so  sold  always  retained  the  right  of  redemption. 


CITIES  OF  REFUGE 

The  sanctuary  or  city  of  refuge  which  was  in 
the  early  ages  peculiar  to  the  Jews  provides  another 
valuable  correspondence  with  Central  American 
institutions.  The  Vanquech  or  place  of  worship 
among  the  Californians,  like  the  marae  among  the 
Tahitians,  was  a  large  unroofed  enclosure,  and,  like 
it,  not  to  be  approached  without  reverence.  Each 
Vanquech  was  a  city  of  refuge,  and  with  rights  of 
sanctuary  like  those  among  the  Society  Islanders 
that  exceeded  any  ever  granted  in  a  Jewish  or  a 
Christian  community.  Not  only  was  the  criminal 
who  entered  the  Vanquech  safe,  but  even  contact 
with  the  sacred  enclosure  was  deemed  sufficient  to 
purge  the  criminal  from  his  offence,  so  that  he  was 
at  liberty  to  return  to  his  home. 

In  the  face  of  such  a  list  of  correspondences  as 
have  been  given  it  is  needless  to  continue  this  in 
vestigation  further,  for  while  it  is  highly  probable 
that  Chinese  and  Japanese  junks,  driven  by  storm 
or  swept  by  currents,  may  have  reached  the  western 
shores  of  America,  and  that  the  eastern  sea-board 
was  visited  at  long  intervals  by  Icelanders,  Scandi 
navians,  Welsh,  Irish,  and  Scotch,  still  it  is  clear 
that  it  is  not  to  such  sources  that  we  must  look  for 
a  solution  of  the  problems  that  are  presented  by 
the  civilisation  of  the  American  Continent.  These 


244    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

visits  were  in  the  very  nature  of  things  accidental. 
They  were  not  the  result  of  any  concerted  move 
ment  either  of  a  national  or  of  an  international 
character.  Moreover,  if  the  strangers  who  succeeded 
in  reaching  either  the  eastern  or  western  shores  of 
the  continent  had  been  spared  they  naturally  would 
have  settled  among  the  people  and  imparted  know 
ledge  and  ideas  that  in  some  form  would  have 
moulded  the  thought  of  future  generations.  Still, 
even  with  this  admission,  we  would  be  without  a 
solution  of  our  problem,  because  it  is  impossible 
to  suppose  that  this  information  or  the  physical 
peculiarities  so  transmitted  could  have  survived  the 
lapse  of  a  few  generations  of  intermarriage  with  the 
strong  aboriginal  stock.  Unless,  therefore,  we  were 
able  to  show  that  there  was  an  importation  of 
emigrants  in  sufficient  numbers  and  of  a  civilisation 
superior  to  that  existing  there  and  capable  of  domi 
nating  the  aboriginal  population,  our  investigation 
would  have  been  fruitless. 

Now  the  trend  of  our  entire  research  has  gone  to 
show  that  the  discovery  of  America  was  not  a  mere 
accident  in  the  Phoenician  career  but  a  discovery 
that  was  followed  by  aggressive  colonisation  in 
conjunction  with  the  Hebrews,  and  that  these  two 
nations  drew  into  their  service  still  others  of  a  semi- 
civilised  character,  who  went  with  them  in  the 
capacity  of  seamen  or  marines.  How  long  this 
intercourse  between  Asiatic  and  American  Conti 
nents  continued  we  have  no  means  of  determining 
accurately,  although  there  seems  to  be  good  reason 
why  it  should  not  be  limited  to  a  period  of  less  than 
380  years,  or  from  1050  B.C.,  when  the  expeditions 
of  Solomon  and  Hiram  took  place,  and  670  B.C., 
when  Esdrah addon  I,  the  youngest  son  of  Senna- 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  245 

cherib,  performing  the  feat,  never  since  attempted 
by  a  civilised  power,  penetrated  to  the  heart  of 
Africa  and,  capturing  the  cities  of  that  desert- 
guarded  region,  reduced  the  peninsula  to  the  con 
dition  of  an  Assyrian  province.  This  incident  for 
a  period  closed  the  navigation  of  the  Persian  Gulf 
to  the  Phoenicians. 

The  great  difficulty  in  arriving  at  a  solution  of 
our  problem  has  not  been  the  lack  of  information 
so  much  as  a  certain  unwillingness  to  believe  that 
the  men  of  past  ages  outran  us  in  many  direc 
tions  and  were  in  possession  of  such  knowledge  and 
such  appliances  as  the  navigation  to  and  the  dis 
covery  of  the  American  Continent  demanded.  In 
view  of  what  has  been  submitted,  however,  it  should, 
we  think,  be  apparent  that  neither  the  men,  the 
knowledge,  the  initiative,  nor  the  resource  were 
lacking  at  that  period  to  accomplish  all  that  was 
involved  in  the  discovery  of  the  American  Continent. 

For  many  years  there  has  existed  among  in 
vestigators  of  this  problem  a  belief  that  it  is  one 
that  never  can  be  solved,  and,  so  far  as  dependence 
on  the  information  provided  by  the  ancient  monu 
ments  in  the  New  World  itself  is  concerned,  there 
can  be  no  question  that  this  is  no  erroneous  belief, 
the  light  which  these  monuments  provided  being 
one-sided  and  incomplete.  It  is  rather  to  the  traces 
of  an  advanced  civilisation  which,  up  to  a  compara 
tively  recent  date,  have  survived  among  the  people 
themselves  along  the  route  of  the  voyages  of  Hiram 
and  Solomon  that  we  must  look. 

We  have,  moreover,  shown  in  the  clearest  pos 
sible  manner  by  means  of  existing  traditions  and 
records  found  among  the  early  civilised  peoples  of 
America  the  destination  to  which  these  expeditions 


246    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

of  Solomon  and  Hiram  were  directed,  and  that  the 
remoteness  of  this  region  explains  in  a  wholly 
satisfactory  manner  the  long  period  of  time  that 
was  spent  on  the  return  voyages.  Moreover, 
abundant  evidence  has  been  produced  indicative 
of  the  presence  of  all  the  nations  comprising  the 
personnel  of  these  expeditions  over  the  entire  course 
pursued  by  the  ships.  We  have,  therefore,  ex 
plained  in  a  rational  way  the  causes  which  operated 
to  plant  in  the  New  World  simultaneously,  a  some 
what  advanced  civilisation,  alongside  a  rude  state 
of  society  which  we  are  accustomed  to  call  abori 
ginal  or  semi-civilised.  How  long,  it  will  be  asked, 
did  the  Hebrew  participation  in  these  expeditions 
last  ?  Fortunately,  there  does  not  seem  to  be 
much  difficulty  in  answering  the  question  if  the 
Scripture  narrative  is  followed  and  Archbishop 
Usher's  chronology  adopted. 

That  a  complete  rupture  in  the  cordial  relations 
that  had  for  so  many  years  existed  between  Israel 
and  Phoenicia  followed  the  massacre  of  the  priests 
of  Baal  by  Elijah  (i  Kings  xviii.  40)  is  more  than 
probable,  and  under  any  circumstance  could  not 
have  survived  the  assassination  of  Jezebel  the  wife 
of  Ahab  and  the  daughter  of  Ethbaal,  King  of  Tyre 
(2  Kings  ix.  36),  for  the  Hebrew  writers  inform  us 
in  2  Chronicles  xx.  36  that  Jehoshaphat  attempted 
to  open  up  the  eastern  Tharshish  trade  on  Jewish 
account  by  building  a  special  fleet  of  ships  at 
Eziongeber.  This  expedition,  however,  ended  dis 
astrously,  and  so  far  as  we  have  any  information 
on  the  subject  no  other  attempt  in  this  direction  was 
ever  made.  This,  therefore,  would  narrow  down  the 
period  of  Jewish  participation  to  the  dates  between 
1050  B.C.  and  897  B.C.,  or  in  all  157  years,  quite 


CIVILISATIONS    COMPARED  247 

sufficient  time,  however,  through  which  to  account 
for  the  very  pronounced  Hebrew  influence  which  we 
found  pervading  the  civilised  Central  American 
States. 

Nothing  further  now  remains  except  to  sum  up 
the  evidence  submitted,  so  that  it  may  be  presented 
in  a  form  easy  of  comprehension  by  the  average 
reader. 


CHAPTER    XI 

CONCLUSION 

List  of  some  of  the  more  apparent  correspondences  found  to  exist 
between  the  people  inhabiting  the  shores  of  the  Eastern  Mediter 
ranean  and  those  of  Central  America — Quotation  of  or  reference  to 
authorities  on  which  the  argument  is  founded. 

i.  THE  civilisation  of  the  Aztecs,  using  the  name 
as  a  generic  term,  came  from  the  eastern  shores  of 
the  Mediterranean. 

AUTHORITIES. — Prescott,  Mexico,  iii.  418 ;  Wilson, 
Prehistoric  Man,  p.  615  ;  Gallatin,  Amer.  Ethno.  Society 
Trans.,  i.  158  ;  Humboldt,  Exam.  Crit.,  ii.  68  ;  Nadullac, 
Prehistoric  America  ;  Bancroft,  Nat.  Races,  v.  30. 

2.  Its  intermediaries  were  the  Hebrews  and  Phoe 
nicians  with  whom  were  associated  as  seamen  and 
marines   on    the   large    armed   ships   of   Tharshish 
representatives  of  the  two  great  nations  of  South 
eastern  Europe,  the  Thracians  and  Scythians,  who 
were  accustomed  to  hire  themselves  out  as  mer 
cenaries. 

AUTHORITIES. — i  Kings  x.  22  ;  Strabo,  B.  vii.  ;  Hero 
dotus,  vii.  96  ;  Strabo,  ii.  221  ;  Herod.,  iv.  59  ;  Ency. 
Brit.,  xxiii.  22  ;  Ellis,  Poly.  Res.,  iv.  431  ;  Bancroft,  Nat. 
Races,  iii.  165. 

3.  The  expeditions  which  succeeded  in  planting 
what  is  popularly  known  as  the  Aztec  civilisation 
on  the  American  Continent  were  sent  by  Solomon 
and  Hiram.     They  sailed  from  Eziongeber  on  the 

^Elantic  Gulf  of  the  Red  Sea  to  a  destination  called 

248 


CONCLUSION  249 

Ophir,  whose  location  we  have  not  so  far  succeeded 
in  determining  satisfactorily. 

AUTHORITIES. — i  Kings  x.  27  ;  2  Chron.  viii.  17. 

4.  From  the   fact  that  these  joint  expeditions 
of   Solomon   and   Hiram   occupied    three   years   in 
the  prosecution   of  their   voyages,   and  that  they 
brought  back  silver  as  the  staple  of  their  cargoes, 
it  is  evident  that  Ophir  of  India  or  South  Arabia 
cannot  be  viewed  as  the  destination  for  which  the 
ships  set  out,  although  Ophir  of  South  Arabia  or 
India  may  reasonably  enough  be  regarded  as  the 
general  direction  pursued  by  the  fleets.     The  diffi 
culty  in  determining  the  actual  destination  of  the 
ships   should,   however,   occasion  no   surprise,   for, 
after  the  displacement  of  the   Phoenicians  on  the 
Eastern  Mediterranean   by  the  Greeks,   a  century 
and  a  half  before  the  date  of  the  expeditions  that 
sailed  from  Eziongeber,  the  Phoenicians  adopted  a 
policy  of  secrecy  as   to   the  route  and  destination 
of  their  more  distant  voyages,  so  that  competing 
nations  might  not  invade  valuable  territory  in  their 
possession. 

AUTHORITIES. — Heeren,  Asiat.  Nations,  i.  31  ;  Josephus, 
vi.  4  and  vi.  147  ;  Longmans'  Classical  Atlas,  Map  7  ; 
Heeren,  Asiatic  Research,  iii.  320  and  iii.  328  ;  Rawlinson's 
Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  60  ;  Heeren,  Phoenicia,  ii.  315. 

5.  Light  on  this  enigma  may,  however,  be  ob 
tained  by  observing  such  traces  as  still  exist  of  the 
presence  of  the  nations  which  formed  the  personnel 
of  these  expeditions  in  distant  regions,  because  the 
Phoenicians  were  accustomed  to  establish  along  the 
route  of  their  more  distant   voyages,  stations   for 
repairing  and  revictualling  their  ships  and  ports  of 
call,  to  which  their  vessels  might  run  in  times  of 


250    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

stress.  These  were  placed  under  the  direction  of 
responsible  agents,  who  must  necessarily  have  been 
of  Hebrew,  Phoenician,  Thracian,  or  Scythian 
extraction. 

AUTHORITIES. — Heeren,    Asiatic    Research,    ii.    314,    ii. 
322,  and  iii.  328. 

6.  Following  this  method  of  procedure,  we  are 
enabled  to  satisfactorily  determine  the  route  which 
the  vessels  pursued,  for  in  consequence  of  the  well- 
known  integrity  of  the  race  and  their  association 
with  the  Phoenicians  as  marines  on  their  ships,  a 
Scythian  would  appear  to  have  been  selected  as  the 
governor  or  superintendent  of  the  Pacific  colonies 
erected  on  the  Navigator  and  Society  group  of 
islands.  This  conclusion  is  amply  warranted  by  a 
consideration  of  the  following  facts  as  well  as  those 
already  submitted. 

(a)  Tahiti,  the  principal  island  in  the  Society 
group,  is  so  named  after  Tabiti,  the  Scythian  Vesta 
or    queen    of    heaven.     The    native    pronunciation 
emphasizes  in  a  peculiar  way  this  fact,  for  by  elimi 
nating  the  disputable  consonants  "  b  "  and   "  h  " 
which  distinguish  the  two  names,  both  will  be  found 
to  spell  and  sound  Taiti,  which  agrees  with  that 
found   in   use   among   the   natives   of   the   Society 
Islands   when   discovered   by   the   navigator   Bou 
gainville. 

(b)  Papeete,  the  name  of  the  chief  town  on  the 
principal   island,   is   clearly   derived   from   that   of 
Papeus,  the  Scythian  Jupiter  or  father. 

(c)  The    religious     traditions     of     the     Society 
Islanders  were  clearly  derived  from  Hebrew  sources, 
as  may  be  seen  in  their  story  of  the  creation  of  the 
first  man  and  his  wife,  Eve,  from  the  red  earth  and 


CONCLUSION  251 

their  traditions  of  the  flood,  and  of  the  sun  being 
commanded  to  stand  still. 

(d)  While,  however,  the  presence  of  the  Scythian 
and  Jew  can  be  thus  clearly  established,  it  is  evident 
that  they  occupied  the  islands  in  conjunction  with 
the  Thracians   and   Phoenicians,   for  the  tattooing 
is  clearly  Thracian,  and  the  religious  system  of  the 
Society  Islanders  is  unmistakably  that  of  Phoenicia, 
as  may  be  seen  in  their  sacred  groves  and  open-air 
temples  or  marais  and  their  human  sacrifices,  but 
especially  in  a  consideration  of  the  Areois  Society, 
whose    methods    of   initiation    and    practices    were 
identical  with  those  of  the  Galli  or  priests  of  Astarte. 

(e)  The  presence  of  the  Phoenicians  in  the  Society 
Islands  is,  moreover,  made  evident  by  a  comparison 
of  Strabo's  description  of  the  Sidonian-Phcenician's 
skill  in  the  use  of  numbers  and  astronomy  with  that 
of  the  Society  islanders  given  by  Mr.  Ellis  in  his 
Polynesian  Researches.     Mr.  Ellis  calls  attention  to 
the  extraordinary  skill  of  the  Society  islanders  in 
the  use  of  numericals,  and  to  the  very  significant 
fact  that  their  names  of  stars  and  groups  and  the 
use  to  which  they  applied  their  knowledge  of  the 
heavenly  bodies  was  the  same  as  that  of  the  inhabi 
tants  of  the  eastern  shores  of  the  Mediterranean. 

AUTHORITIES. — Herod.,  iv.  46  ;  Strabo,  B.  vii.  and  vii.  8 ; 
Ezek.  xxviii.  16  ;  Herod.,  vii.  96  ;  Strabo,  ii.  221  ;  Herod., 
iv.  59  ;  Taiti,  Ency.  Brit.,  xxiii.  22  ;  Ellis,  Poly.  Res.,  iv.  431 ; 
"  Clay  Eating,"  Ellis,  Poly.  Res.,  i.  115  ;  Bancroft,  Nat.  Races, 
iii.  165;  " Creation  Tradition/'  Ellis,  Poly. Res. ,i.  115;  Samoa, 
Dr.  Turner,  art.  "Bowditch  Island"  ;  Genesis  ii.  9,  ii.  20,  and 
iii.  20 ;  "Flood  Tradition,"  Ellis,  Poly.  Res.,  i.  114  and  iii.  170 ; 
Joshua  x.  12  ;  "  Temples,"  Ellis,  Poly.  Res. ;  Rawlinson's, 
Story  of  Phoenicia,  pp.  109  and  252  ;  2  Kings  xviii.  4 ; 
Stanley,  Lectures  on  the  Jewish  Church,  ii.  246  ;  Renan, 
Mission  de  Phenicie,  p.  39 ;  "Totemism,"  Sayce,  Anct.  Empires 


252    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

of  the  East  Phoenicia  ;  Bancroft,  Nat.  Races,  iii.  281  ;  Hero 
dotus,  iv.  59  ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  442  ;  Ellis,  Poly.  Res.,  articles 
"  Temples  "  and  "  Gods  "  ;  "  Galli  or  Priests  of  Astarte," 
Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  116 ;  Dr.  Dollinger,  Heidenthum, 
p.  425  ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  508,  and  iii.  482  ;  Strabo,  xvi. 
757  ;  Poly.  Research,  ii.  422  and  iii.  170  ;  Story  of  Phoenicia, 
p.  39  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xviii.  804  ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  274  ;  Hastings' 
Dictionary  of  the  Bible,  article  "  Pleiades  "  ;  Poly.  Res.,  iii. 
167  ;  Genesis  i.  16  ;  Story  of  Phoenicia,  pp.  29  and  90  ; 
Poly.  Res.,  iii.  170  and  i.  87  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  viii.  158  ;  Poly. 
Res.,  i.  401  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  603. 

The  name  Morea  applied  to  an  island  separated 
from  Papeete,  the  principal  town  in  the  Society 
group,  by  a  narrow  strait  ten  miles  wide,  is  the  same 
as  that  of  one  of  the  principal  districts  of  the  Hellenic 
Peninsula,  colonised  by  the  Scythians  shortly  before 
this  period.  It  is  said  to  have  received  its  name 
in  consequence  of  the  contour  of  the  shore  line  of  the 
peninsula  resembling  the  form  of  a  mulberry  leaf. 
If  this  explanation  is  correct  then  the  name  would  be 
equally  applicable  to  Morea  of  the  Society  Islands. 

AUTHORITIES. — Ency.    Brit,    and    Naval   Charts    of  the 
Peloponnesus  and  Society  Islands. 

8.  Samos  of  the  Sporades,  which  lie  off  the  coasts 
of  Asia  Minor,  was  clearly  the  source  of  Samoa  of 
the  Pacific.  This  conclusion  is  warranted  by  a 
consideration  of  the  following  facts,  among  others  : 

(a)  The  native  name  of  Samos  of  the  Sporades, 
according  to  Pliny,  was  not  Samos  but  Samo,  which 
is  also  the  native  name  of  Samoa  of  the  Pacific. 
Although  resident  there  for  the  major  portion  of 
two  years  I  do  not  recall  a  single  exception  to  this 
pronunciation  of  the  name  by  a  native  Samoan  in 
any  part  of  this  group  of  islands. 

(b)  The   name   of    the   principal    island   in    the 


CONCLUSION  253 

Samoan  group  is  Upolo,  the  equivalent  of  Apollo, 
the  Scythian  deity.  The  name  of  the  principal 
town — and  since  it  faces  the  main  entrance  to  the 
lagoon  the  first  town — is  Apia,  the  same  as  that  of 
the  Scythian  deity,  the  earth,  and  the  name  of  the 
Peloponnesus  before  the  displacement  of  the  Scythians 
by  the  Greeks  under  Pelops. 

(c)  The  alphabet  received  from  the  Phoenicians 
and    introduced    into    Greece    shortly    before    this 
period  by  Cadmus,  the  son  of  Agenor,  King  of  Phoe 
nicia,  consisted  of  sixteen  letters,  the  same  as  the 
Samoan.     The    language    of    the    Samians    of    the 
Sporades   was   a   dialect   of   the   Ionic   peculiar   to 
themselves.     We  have,  therefore,  in  the  connection 
what  will  probably  be  found  to  be  a  clue  leading  to 
a  solution  of  the  perplexing  enigma  as  to  the  source 
from  which  the  Polynesian  language  was  derived. 

(d)  The  natives  of  both  islands  were  famous  as 
seamen.     Samos    of   the    Sporades   was   the   head 
quarters    of    the    Ionian    fleet,    and    the    Samians, 
shortly  after  the  date  of  their  expeditions,  were  the 
first  to  lead  the  Greeks  through  the  Pillars  of  Her 
cules  into  the  Atlantic.     The  Samoans  of  the  Pacific 
were  named  navigators  by  the  discoverer  Bougain 
ville   on   account   of   their  nautical   skill.     To    the 
Samoans,  likewise,  is  accredited  the  distinction  of 
having  peopled  the  Pacific  Islands  from  Hawaii  to 
New  Zealand. 

(e)  The  name  Samos  or  Samo,  according  to  Pliny, 
means  a  mountain  height  by  the  sea,  and  was  there 
fore    descriptive    of    the   physical    features    of    the 
island  in  the  Mediterranean.     The  name  is,  however, 
equally  applicable  to  all  the  Pacific  Samoan  Islands, 
for  they  are  composed  of  what  seamen  frequenting 


254    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

these  regions  call  high  islands  to  distinguish  them 
from  the  low  coral  attols  by  which  they  are  sur 
rounded  for  hundreds  of  miles  in  every  direction. 

AUTHORITIES. — Pliny,  v.  37  ;  Strabo,  viii.  503  ;  Smith's 
Dictionary  of  the  Bible,  article  "  Samos  "  ;  Heeren,  Asiat. 
Nations,  p.  311  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xvii.  279  ;  Herodotus,  iv.  59  ; 
Strabo,  i.  493  ;  Herod.,  i.  142  ;  Ratzel's  History  of  Man 
kind,  article  "  Polynesians  "  ;  Heeren,  p.  309  ;  Herod.,  v.  58  ; 
Ency.  Brit.,  vii.  279  ;  Thucydides,  i.  13 ;  Herod.,  iv.  152. 

9.  In  consequence  of  the  international  character 
of  the  expeditions  of  Solomon  and  Hiram,  the  crews 
of  the  joint  fleets  were  undoubtedly  picked  men 
from  the  Phoenician  craft  then  in  port,  but  as  Phoe 
nicia,  from  the  very  limited  area  of  its  territory, 
could  not  have  provided  men  in  sufficient  numbers 
to  supply  the  insistent  demands  made  on  its  popu 
lation  by  the  various  enterprises  in  which  its 
people  were  engaged,  the  difficulty  clearly  enough 
seems  to  have  been  overcome  by  securing  suitable 
men  from  among  the  various  seafaring  nations 
adjacent  to  their  own  coasts,  with  whom  they  had 
friendly  and  commercial  relations.  And  as  the 
Scythians  and  Thracians,  at  that  time  the  greatest 
nations  in  South-Eastern  Europe,  were  seamen  and 
accustomed  to  hire  themselves  out  as  mercenaries, 
it  is  reasonable,  in  view  of  what  has  been  said,  to 
ascribe  the  tattooing  of  the  Pacific  Islands  and 
the  American  Continent  to  the  Thracian  and  the 
cannibalism  to  Scythian  origin. 

(a)  This  conclusion  is,  moreover,  further  war 
ranted  by  a  consideration  of  the  fact  that  the 
gymnastic  system  in  use  on  the  Mediterranean  as 
a  means  of  training  for  the  exigencies  of  war,  as 
well  as  all  the  implements  used  in  its  prosecution 


CONCLUSION  255 

(including  bow  and  arrow,  spear,  javelin,  dart, 
falchion,  sword,  and  sling,  as  well  as  the  curved 
throw-stick  or  boomerang  used  in  the  chase),  are 
found  over  the  entire  course  pursued  by  the  ships 
on  their  voyages  across  the  Pacific  and  on  the 
Pacific  slopes  of  the  American  Continent. 

AUTHORITIES.  —  Herod.,  v.  3;  Strabo,  B.  i.  ii.  28; 
Xenophon,  B.  i.  i.  ;  "  Mercenaries/'  Dr.  Smith,  Greek  and 
Roman  Antiquities ;  Herod.,  i.  171  ;  Pausanius,  iv.  8  ; 
Herod.,  vii.  26  ;  Thucydides,  i.  121,  vi.  25,  and  vii.  27  ; 
Ency.  Brit.,  vii.  720  ;  Xenophon,  vi.  2  ;  Memorabilia,  ix.  2  ; 
Syffert's  Diet,  of  Classical  Antiquities,  article  "Mer 
cenaries  "  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  ii.  502  ;  Games,  Ency.  Brit.,  x.  63  ; 
Homer,  Iliad,  xxiii.  710  ;  Dr.  Smith,  Greek  and  Roman 
Antiquities  ;  Poly.  Res.,  i.  204,  i.  208,  i.  290-312  ;  Dr. 
Geo.  Turner,  Samoa  •  "  Spear  and  Javelin/'  Ellis,  Poly.  Res.,  i. 
217  ;  "  Bowmen,"  Herod.,  iv.  9  and  iv.  59  ;  Poly.  Res.,  iv.  431  ; 
"  Circumcision,"  Herod.,  ii.  104  ;  John  vii.  22  ;  Dr.  Geo. 
Turner,  Samoa,  p.  81  ;  Bancroft,  Nat.  Races,  iii.  439  ;  Ency. 
Brit.,  v.  790  ;  "  Tattooing,"  Herod.,  v.  6  ;  Rawlinson, 
Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  88  ;  Dr.  Geo.  Turner,  Samoa,  article 
"  Tattooing  "  ;  Bancroft,  Nat.  Races,  ii.  733  ;  "  Cannibalism," 
Strabo,  iv.  5  ;  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  88  ;  Herod.,  iv.  26  and  iv. 
106  ;  Strabo,  B.  vii.  iii.  9  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xvi.  210  ;  Nat.  Races, 
iii.  316  and  iii.  443  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xvi.  168  ;  Wait's  Poly 
nesia,  vi.  158  ;  Ellis,  Poly.  Res.,  i.  309  ;  Dr.  Turner,  Nineteen 
Years  in  Polynesia,  p.  194 ;  "  Equestrian  Archers,"  Herod.,  iv. 
46  ;  Poly.  Res.,  iii.  102  and  iii.  272  ;  "  Skulls  of  Ancestors," 
Herod.,  iv.  26  ;  Poly.  Res.,  iii.  272  ;  "  Wives  do  not  eat 
with  Husbands,"  Herod.,  i.  146  ;  Poly.  Res.,  i.  116  ;  Nineteen 
Years  in  Polynesia  ;  "  Marines  and  Seamen,"  Herod.,  vii.  96 
and  vii.  184  ;  Strabo,  ii.  221  and  B.  vii.  ;  Ezek.  xxviii.  12. 

10.  Samoa  was,  on  account  of  the  archaic  form 
of  its  language  as  well  as  the  traditions  of  the  Pacific 
Islanders,  the  source  from  which  the  population  of 
the  Pacific  Islands  from  Hawaii  to  New  Zealand  and 
from  Tonga  to  Tahiti  was  derived.  We  are  there 
fore  in  a  position  to  account  satisfactorily  for  the 
origin  of  the  Polynesian  race  and  for  its  distribution, 


256    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

and  probably   also   for  the  source  from  which  its 
language  was  derived. 

AUTHORITIES. — Ency.  Brit.,  vii.  279  ;  U.  S.  House 
Executive  Documents,  No.  238  ;  U.  S.  Blue  Book  on  Samoa  ; 
International  Ency.,  article  "  Samoa  "  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xvii. 
471  ;  Herod.,  i.  142. 

11.  The  date  of  the  voyages  of  Votan  of  the 
American  tradition  agree  absolutely  with  those  of 
Solomon  and  Hiram,  which  proceeded  in  this  general 
direction,  namely,  about  1050  B.C. 

AUTHORITIES. — Bancroft,  Nat.  Races,  iii.  17,  iii.  45,  iii. 
452  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  i.  704,  xvi.  208  ;  Nat.  Races,  v.  23 ,  v. 
164 ;  "  Long  flowing  robesL"  2  Kings  iv.  29  ;  Herod.,  iv.  29  ; 
2  Kings  ix.  i ;  "  Circum  Africa,"  Herod.,  iv.  41 ;  Heeren, 
Asiat.  Nat.,  ii.  317  ;  Rawlinson,  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  179. 

12.  The  American  civilisation,  its  religious  cult, 
its  traditional  lore,  its  science,  art,  and  manufacture, 
its  strange  customs  and  usages  found  among  the 
civilised  and  uncivilised  peoples  were  one  and  all 
derived    from    the    Eastern    Mediterranean    basin, 
having    been    carried    thither    by    those    crews    of 
composite  nationality  and  the  marine  corps  which 
formed  the  personnel  of  the  fleets  of  Solomon  and 
Hiram.     The  religious  traditions,  and  at  least  the 
prominent  features  of  the  moral  code,  were  derived 
unquestionably  from  Jewish  sources  ;    the  scientific, 
artistic,   and  manufacturing,   as  well  as  the  com 
mercial  and  caravan  systems  and  the  ruder  phases 
of  the  religious  practices,  including  human  sacrifices 
and  totemism,  from  Phoenician  ;  the  tattooing  from 
Thracian,  and  interwoven  with  these  the  peculiar 
masks  of  the  Scythian  in  scalping,  steam-bathing, 
body  painting,  adoration  of  skulls  of  ancestors,  &c. 

AUTHORITIES. — Bancroft,  Nat.  Races.,  vols.  i.  and  ii. ; 
Ency.  Brit.,  vii.  720  ;  Boomerang,  Ency.  Brit.,  vii.  721  ; 


CONCLUSION  257 

Nat.  Races,  i.  541  ;  "  Bow,  Arrow  and  Sling,"  Nat.  Races,  i. 
696  ;  Gymnasiums,  vol.  ii.  244  ;  "  Weaving  and  Dyeing," 
Heeren,  Asiatic  Res.,  i.  342  ;  Story  of  Phoenicians,  p.  285  ; 
Nat.  Races,  i.  630,  i.  698  ;  "  Cotton,"  Ency.  Brit.,  xvi.  208  ; 
Heeren,  i.  38  ;  Herod.,  iii.  106  ;  Commerce  and  Caravan, 
Heeren,  i.  20  ;  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  154  ;  Herod.,  v.  52,  ii. 
177  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  380,  ii.  736  ;  Maps  and  Routes,  Herod., 
iii.  136,  v.  49  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  386,  i.  274  ;  "  Pole  Star," 
Ency.  Brit.,  xviii.  804 ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  274  ;  "  Pleiades," 
Hastings'  Diet,  of  the  Bible  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  755  ;  Worship 
of  One  True  God,  Gen.  i.  i  ;  i  Kings  viii.  27  ;  I  Tim. 
i.  17  ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  55,  iii.  183  ;  Flood  Tradition,  Gen. 
vi.  13 ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  65  ;  Tower  of  Babel,  Gen.  xi. 
2  ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  67  ;  Honour  to  parents,  Deut.  v.  16, 
xxi.  20  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  461,  ii.  463  ;  Judges,  Exod.  xviii. 
15  ;  Deut.  i.  17  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  440,  ii.  446  ;  Law  of 
Evidence,  Gen.,  xxxix.  12  ;  Exod.  xxii.  4  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  656  ; 
"  Totemism,"  Sayce,  Phoenicia,  Nat.  Races,  i.  661  ;  "  Tree 
Worship,"  Sayce,  Phoenicia,  Ency.  Brit.,  xxi.  133  ;  Nat. 
Races,  iii.  459  ;  "  Phallic  Worship,"  Story  of  Phoenicia, 
p.  112  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xviii.  802  ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  501  ; 
"  Human  Sacrifice,"  Dollinger,  Heidenthum,  i,  425  ;  Dio- 
dorus,  Ency.  Brit.,  xviii.  803  ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  482  ;  Theft, 
Exod.  xxii.  1-7  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  456,  ii.  658  ;  False  weights, 
Lev.  xix.  35,  Deut.  xxv.  13  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  664  ;  Marriage 
to  deceased  brother's  widow,  Deut.  xxv.  5  ;  Matt.  xxii.  24  ; 
Nat.  Races,  ii.  466 ;  Widow  property  of  deceased  husband's 
family,  Deut.  xxv.  5  ;  Ruth  iii.  ii  and  iv.  10 ;  Nat. 
Races,  ii.  466  ;  Concubinage,  Judges  xix.  i  ;  i  Kings  xi.  3  ; 
Nat.  Races,  ii.  182,  ii.  164  ;  Adultery,  Lev.  xx.  10,  John 
viii.  4  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  464,  ii.  465,  ii.  674  ;  Incest,  Deut. 
xxvii.  20  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  659  ;  Law  of  Consanguinity, 
Lev.  xviii.  6,  xx.  ii  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  665  ;  Royal  Succes 
sion,  i  Chron.  xxiii.  i  ;  i  Kings  ii.  14  ;  i  Chron.  xxix.  23  ; 
Nat.  Races,  ii.  140  ;  Anointing  and  Coronation,  i  Kings  i. 
39  ;  i  Kings  ix.  22  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  144,  ii.  422,  ii.  641, 
iii.  435  ;  Removal  of  Landmarks,  Deut.  xxvii.  17  ;  Nat. 
Races,  ii.  462-3  ;  Sorcery,  Lev.  xx.  27  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii. 
659 ;  "  Slaves,"  Heeren,  Asiatic  Res.,  i.  367 ;  Story  of 
Phoenicia,  240  ;  i  Kings  ix.  20  ;  2  Chron.  ii.  17  ;  Deut. 
xxiv.  7  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  450,  ii.  650 ;  Redemption  of  Slaves, 
Lev.  xxv.  47  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  650  ;  Cities  of  Refuge,  Num.  iii. 
167  ;  "  Head -Flattening,"  Nadullac,  Prehistoric  America, 

R 


258    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

p.  512  ;  Dr.  Geo.  Turner,  Nineteen  Years  in  Polynesia,  also 
Samoa ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  150  ;  see  also  vols.  i.-ii.  and  iv.  ; 
"  Circumcision,"  Herod.,  ii.  104 ;  John  vii.  22  ;  Ency. 
Brit.,  v.  790  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  278  ;  "  Glass  Manufacture," 
Charnay,  Ancient  Cities  of  the  New  World  •  Nadullac, 
Prehistoric  America,  p.  396  ;  Heeren,  Asiatic  Nations,  i. 
345  ;  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  283  ;  "  Bronze/'  Ency.  Brit.,  xvi. 
213  ;  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  285  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  473,  iv.  519, 
iy-  557  ;  Paper,  Ency.  Brit.,  xviii.  232  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  307, 
322,  334,  485  ;  "  Pearls  and  Pearl  Fishing,"  Heeren,  Asiatic 
Res.,  p.  446  ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  583,  584,  ii.  481,  ii.  732,  ii.  850  ; 
"Quippas,"  Herod.,  iv.  98 ;  Lumholz,  Unknown  Mexico,  ii.  128; 
"Tanning,"  Nat.  Races,  ii.  486;  " Boomerang,"  Ency.  Brit., 
vii.  721  ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  541  ;  "  Implement  of  War,"  Ency. 
Brit.,  vii.  720  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  742  ;  "  Flint  Arrow  Heads," 
Ency.  Brit.,  ii.  554,  vii.  720  ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  342,  541,  627, 
655  ;  "  Bow,  Arrow  and  Sling,"  Ency.  Brit.,  vii.  720,  xvi. 
211 ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  626,  696  ;  "  Gymnasiums,"  Ency.  Brit.,  x. 
63  ;  Dr.  Smith,  Dictionary  of  Greek  and  Roman  A  ntiquaries  ; 
Ellis,  Poly.  Res.,  i.  204  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  244 ;  "  Weaving  and 
Dyeing,"  Heeren,  i.  342 ;  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  285  ;  Nat. 
Races,  i.  502,  650,  ii.  484,  486,  752 ;  "  Cotton,"  Theo- 
phrastus,  History  of  Plants,  iv.  9 ;  Herod.,  iii.  106 ;  Heeren, 
i.  38  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xvi.  208  ;  "  Purple  Dye,"  Heeren,  i.  342  ; 
Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  275  ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  630,  698,  ii.  486  ; 
"Tattooing,"  Herod.,  v.  6;  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  88; 
Dr.  Geo.  Turner,  Samoa,  Nat.  Races,  ii.  733  ;  "  Scalping," 
Herod.,  iv.  64  ;  Turner,  Samoa,  Nat.  Races,  i.  269,  344,  i. 
357,  407,  582,  629  ;  "  Flaying,"  Herod.,  iv.  64  ;  Nat.  Races, 
iii.  308,  355,  iv.  420  ;  "  Nomads,"  Herod.,  iv.  46  ;  Nat. 
Races,  i.  426  ;  "  Plucking  out  Eye  of  Victim,"  Ellis.,  Poly. 
Res.,  i.  357  ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  344  ;  "  Steam-Bathing,"  Herod., 
iv.  73  ;  Nelson's  Ency.,  art.  "  Hemp  "  ;  Ency.  Americana, 
art.  "  Hemp "  ;  Dr.  Geo.  Turner,  Samoa  and  Nineteen 
Years  in  Polynesia,  art.  "  Fine  Mats  "  ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  83, 
202,  537,  iii.  159;  "Moccasins  and  Buskins,"  Herod. ,i.  155, 
vii.  75;  Nat.  Races,  vols.  i.,  ii.,  iii.;  "Lassoing,"  Herod., 
vii.  85. 

13.  Votan,  the  culture  hero  of  the  American 
tradition,  clearly  avowed  his  origin  when  he  affirmed 
that  he  had  made  four  voyages  from  Valum  Votan, 


CONCLUSION  259 

the  new  country  over  which  he  ruled,  to  Valum 
Chivim,  his  native  land,  and  en  route  had  visited 
a  place  where  men  had  erected  a  tower  with  a  view 
to  reaching  heaven,  which  the  inhabitants  had 
informed  him  was  the  spot  where  the  confusion  of 
tongues  had  taken  place.  From  there  he  had 
journeyed  to  the  dwellings  of  the  thirteen  serpents, 
where  he  had  seen  a  magnificent  temple  in  course 
of  construction.  This  was  tantamount  to  saying  : 

(a)  That  he  had  returned  to  the  Mediterranean 
seaboard  not  by  the  Red  Sea  but  by  the  Persian 
Gulf,   calling   at   the   Phoenician  ports   or  colonies 
of   Tylos  and  Arados   in   the   Bahrein   Islands   at 
the   Bay   of    Gerrha,   where   he   had   bartered   his 
first  cargo  of  silver  for  gold  (i  Kings  ix.  28)  and 
repaired    and   revictualled   the   ships ;     that   while 
the  vessels  were  so  employed,  he  had  disembarked 
and,  crossing  the  gulf  to  the  mouth  of  the  Euphrates, 
had   ascended  the  river  to   Borsippa,   one  of  the 
suburbs  of  Babylon,  where  he  visited  the  ruins  of 
the  Tower  of  Babel ;    that  then  he  took  the  short 
desert   route   to   Jerusalem    (passing   en   route   the 
treasure    cities   of    Baalbek   and   Palmyra),   where 
he  reported  to  the   Israelitish  king,  the  principal 
partner  in  these  joint  expeditions. 

(b)  That,    accompanied   by    King   Solomon,    he 
had  inspected  the  great  temple  then  in  course  of 
construction  at  Jerusalem  under  the  direction  of  a 
Phoenician  architect  called  Hiram. 

(c)  That  following  the  inspection  of  the  temple 
he,  along  with  King  Solomon,  had  made  a  tour  of 
the  principal  cities  of  the  thirteen  tribes  of  Israel. 
The    cognomen    serpents    used    in    the    American 
tradition  being  easily  explained  by  the  fact  that  the 


260    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

reptile  was  not  only  the  totem  of  Hiram  and  the 
Phoenicians,  but  also  in  some  measure,  that  of  David 
and  Solomon,  who  belonged  to  the  family  of  Nashon, 
the  serpent  after  whom  Nachan  or  the  City  of  the 
Serpents,  the  first  city  on  the  American  Continent, 
was  named. 

AUTHORITIES. — "American  Tradition,"  Ency.  Brit.,  i.  704; 
Nat.  Races,  iii.  45,  452  ;  Nat.  Races,  v.  22  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xvi. 
208  ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  26,  v.  164  ;  "  Long  flowing  Robes,"  Ency. 
Brit.,  xvi.  208  ;  Herod.,  i.  72  ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  269,  v.  23  ; 
2  Kings  iv.  29 ;  2  Kings  ix.  i ;  Navigation  of  Persian  Gulf, 
Strabo  no  ;  Heeren,  Phoenicia,  \.  438,  ii.  322,  ii.  333,  676, 
iii.  336  ;  Maspero,  Origin  of  the  Phoenicians,  vol.  iv.  ;  Heeren, 
Babylonians,  p.  444  ;  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  22  ;  Tower  of 
Babel,  Gen.  xi.  1-9  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  iii.  178  ;  Nat.  Races,  v. 
27  ;  Eziongeber,  2  Chron.  ii.  n,  viii.  17  ;  "  Short  Desert 
Route,"  Heeren,  Phoenicia,  i.  369,  iii.  113,  iv.  356  ;  i  Kings 
ix.  18  ;  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  167  ;  Scribner's,  March  1908 
(art.  "  Damascus") ;  " Bagdad  Railway,"  Heeren,  Phoenicia, 
i.  362  ;  "  Silver  for  Gold,"  Heeren,  Asiat.  Nat.,  i.  31,  iii.  327  ; 
i  Kings  ix.  28  ;  i  Kings  x.  27  ;  2  Chron.  viii.  18  ;  Ency. 
Brit.,  xvi.  276  ;  Heeren,  iv.  353  ;  Baalbek  and  Palmyra, 
i  Kings  ix.  18  ;  2  Chron.  viii.  4  ;  Heeren,  Phoenicia,  i.  364  ; 
"Navigation  of  Euphrates,"  Heeren,  Asiat.  Nat.,  i.  364.  i.  438  ; 
Solomon  at  Eziongeber,  2  Chron.  vii.  17  ;  "  Votan  goes  by 
Divine  Command  to  America,"  Nat.  Races,  iii.  452  and  v.  159 ; 
Temple  at  Jerusalem,  i  Chron.  xxix.  i,  2  Chron.  ii.  i,  and 
iii.  i  ;  Hiram  the  Workman,  i  Kings  vii.  31  ;  2  Chron.  ii. 
13  ;  Army  of  Workmen,  i  Kings  v.  13  ;  i  Kings  ix.  21  ; 
Eusebius,  Praep.  Evan.,  x.  77  ;  "  Totemism  Serpents,"  Ency. 
Brit.,  xxiii.  471  ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  45  ;  Sayce,  Ancient  Empires 
of  the  East,  p.  200  ;  Num.  xxi.  8,  2  Kings  xviii.  4  ;  Nat. 
Races,  iii.  452. 

14.  That  from  Jerusalem  Votan  proceeded  to  Tyre 
and  made  his  report  in  duplicate  to  Hiram,  Solomon's 
partner  in  these  joint  expeditions,  after  which  he 
crossed  over  to  his  own  home  at  Vitim  or  Chittim 
on  the  island  of  Cyprus,  then  a  Phoenician  colony. 


CONCLUSION  261 

(a)  This  conduces  to  the  belief  that  Votan,  prior 
to  his  being  selected  for  the  command  of  these  ex 
peditions  which  annexed  the  Pacific  Islands  and  the 
American  Continent  to  Phoenicia,  had  been  Governor 
of  Cyprus  with  headquarters  at  the  town  of  Chittim, 
and  that  as  plenipotentiary  to  the  American  colony 
he  was  succeeded  in  office  by  Hiram,  the  workman. 
Hiram,  on  account  of  the  invaluable  services  which 
he  had  rendered  to  Phoenicia  and  Israel  in  the  erec 
tion  of  the  temples  at  island  Tyre  and  Jerusalem 
and   the   palaces   for   Solomon    at    Jerusalem    and 
Lebanon,  which  cemented  the  friendship  between 
the   two  monarchs   and  led  to   these   expeditions, 
which  had  become  so  immensely  profitable  to  both 
nations,  had,  under  the  conferred  name  of  Quetzal- 
coatt — the   royal   or   feathered   serpent — been   ap 
pointed  the  personal  representative  of  Solomon  and 
Hiram  in  the  New  World. 

Accompanied  by  nineteen  of  his  leading  superin 
tendents  of  works  he,  on  his  arrival,  began  the 
systematic  instruction  of  the  inhabitants  of  this 
new  colony,  called  the  land  of  Votan,  in  the  know 
ledge  of  the  exact  sciences  and  mechanical  arts  of 
which  throughout  antiquity  Phoenicia  had  been  the 
leading  exponent. 

(b)  That  Votan  established  in  the  new  colony 
a  central  government,  gave  to  the  people  a  code  of 
good  laws,  taught  them  a  pure  and  humane  religion, 
and   communicated   to   them   a   knowledge   of  the 
Supreme  Deity,  the  God  of  all  Truth. 

(c)  Discovering,    however,    the   impossibility   of 
creating   a  homogeneous   people    out   of    so   many 
racially  discordant  elements,  he  divided  the  land  into 
four  sections,  which  corresponded  to  the  peculiar 


262    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

needs  of  the  four  nations  which  were  represented 
in  the  personnel  of  these  expeditions — Hebrews, 
Phoenicians,  Scythians,  and  Thracians  —  and  so 
secured  peace  and  a  stable  government. 

AUTHORITIES. — Ency.  Brit.,  i.  704  ;  Nat.  Races,  iii.  451, 
v.  23,  v.  159,  and  v.  164  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xvi.  208  ;  I  Kings 
vii.  13  ;  2  Chron.  ii.  13  ;  "  Serpent  Symbolism,"  Sayce, 
Phoenicia,  Totemism,  Nat.  Races,  iii.  240,  iii.  451  ;  Chittim, 
Hastings'  Dictionary  of  the  Bible ;  Heeren,  i.  305,  ii.  311 ; 
Herod.,  vii.  90  ;  Cicero,  De  Finibus,  iv.  20  ;  Herod.,  i.  105  ; 
Diod.,  v.  55  and  v.  77  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xi.  90  ;  Nat.  Races, 
v.  159. 

15.  That  the  Scythian  contingent,  who  tolerated 
the  presence  of  no  foreign  customs,  were  the  mal 
contents  who  fomented  the  insurrection  against  the 
Votanic  government,  which  necessitated  the  segre 
gation  of  the  various  discordant  racial  elements. 
That  they  in  all  probability,  accompanied  by  their 
conquerors  the  Thracians,  separated  themselves 
from  their  more  civilised  neighbours  and  returned 
to  their  semi-barbaric  life  on  the  new  continent. 
That  the  body  painting,  totemic,  steam-bathing, 
equestrian  archers,  the  Scythians  of  South-Eastern 
Europe  ;  the  Phoenician  commercial  correspondents, 
with  the  Thracian  tattooers  (both  of  whom  were 
accustomed  to  hire  themselves  out  as  mercenaries), 
were  the  marines  and  in  all  probability  a  portion 
of  the  crews  manning  the  ships  of  these  joint  fleets; 
and  that  these  were  the  authors  of  those  strange 
customs  of  South-Eastern  European  origin  found  in 
Samoa,  Tahiti,  the  American  Continent,  and  among 
the  Nomad  equestrian  archers  of  the  New  World. 

AUTHORITIES. — Nat.  Races,  v.  159  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  i.  704  ; 
"Scythians  avoid  use  of  Foreign  Customs,"  Herod.,  iv.  76  ; 
"Body  Painting,"  Herod.,  iv.,  108  ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  426; 


CONCLUSION  263 

"  Nomads,"  Herod.,  iv.  46  ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  426  ;  "  Totemic," 
Ency.  Brit.,  xxiii.  471  ;  2  Kings  xviii.  4 ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  66 1  ; 
Herod.,  iv.  105  ;  "  Steam-Bathing,"  Herod.,  iv.  73;  Nat. 
Races,  i.  83,  i.  537,  iii.  159  ;  "Equestrian  Archers,"  Herod., 
iv.  46  ;  "  Tattooing,"  Herod.,  v.  6  ;  Nat.  Races,  i.  332,  ii.  730  ; 
"  Seamen,"  Strabo,  ii.  221  ;  Strabo,  B.  vii.,Ezek.  xxviii.  12  ; 
Marines,  vii.  96. 

16.  That  the  staple  of  the  cargoes  brought  back 
from  America  was  mainly  silver,  but  that  calling 
at  Java,  Sumatra,  Ceylon,  Tylos,  and  Arados  or 
other  parts  in  Ophir  of  India  or  Arabia  for  barter 
and  repair,  or  for  water  and  provisions,  they  dis 
posed  of  this  cargo  of  silver  for  gold  and  purchased 
the  remainder  of  the  merchandise.  That  this  re 
mainder  consisted  of  East  Indian  and  Arabian 
wares  much  in  demand  at  Jerusalem  and  Tyre, 
viz.,  ivory,  apes,  peacocks,  algum  trees,  frankin 
cense,  spices,  pearls,  and  precious  stones,  the  pur 
chase  of  which  was  rendered  the  easier,  in  that  silver 
in  Arabia,  according  to  Agatharchides,  was  ten 
times  the  value  of  gold,  which  latter  metal  was 
there  in  great  abundance.  While,  according  to 
Heeren,  possibly,  bartered  silver  for  gold,  weight  for 
weight,  had  still  an  exchange  value  very  much  in 
favour  of  silver,  they  were  able  by  means  of  this 
mixed  cargo  to  pursue  their  usual  policy  of  envelop 
ing  the  destination  of  their  more  distant  voyages 
with  a  veil  of  mysterious  and  impenetrable  secrecy. 

AUTHORITIES. — i  Kings  x.  27  ;  Nat.  Races,  ii.  474  ; 
Ency.  Brit.,  xvi.  216 ;  Heeren,  iii.  327  ;  "  Smelting  at  Mines," 
Rawlinson,  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  70  ;  Barter  silver  for 
gold,  2  Chron.  viii.  18  ;  Gold  in  Arabia,  Judges  viii.  24  ; 
Heeren,  Phoenicia,  iv.  353  ;  i  Kings  ix.  28  ;  "  Silver  in  Asia," 
Heeren,  Asiatic  Nations,  i.  31  ;  Peacocks,  Ency.  Brit., 
xviii.  443  ;  Nelson's  Ency. ;  Heeren,  Phoenicia,  iv.  346  ; 
"  Frankincense  and  Spices/'  Herod.,  i.  183  ;  Herod.,  iii.  107  ; 


264    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Heeren,  Phoenicia,  iv.  346  ;  "  Precious  Stones  and  Pearls," 
Heeren,  iv.  346 ;  "  Commercial  Jealousy  of  Assyrians,"  Ency. 
Brit.,  iii.  192;  "  Policy  of  Secrecy,"  Rawlinson,  Story  of 
Phoenicia,  p.  60  ;  Heeren,  ii.  316,  and  ii.  326. 


NAVIGATION   AND   DISCOVERY 

AUTHORITIES. — Heeren,  Phoenicia,  ii.  320  and  iii.  338 ; 
Story  of  Phoenicia,  pages  179  and  309 ;  Xenophon, 
(Eocon.,  vii.  4;  Herod.,  iv.  41;  Strabo,  xvi.  759;  "Ships 
of  Tharshish,"  Ragozin,  Story  of  Assyia-,  Perrot  and 
Chipiez,  History  of  Phoenician  Art ;  "  Torr's  Ancient  Ships, 
1896,"  Cotterill  and  Little,  Ships  Ancient  and  Modern, 
p.  ii  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  i.  709  and  xviii.  804  ;  Robert  Louis 
Stevenson's  In  South  Seas,  Scribner's  Sons  (see  chart)  ; 
Alfred  Brittain,  History  of  North  America,  Ships  of  Columbus, 
Dent  &  Co.,  London :  Cook's  Voyages,  p.  9. 


FINANCE 

"  Solomon's  Wealth,"  Hastings'  Dictionary  cf  the  Bible, 
iv.  566  ;   M'Clintock  and  Strong,  Cyclopedia  Biblica,  p.  837. 


RELIGIOUS  DECADENCE 

AUTHORITIES. — 2  Kings  xvii.  16 ;  Ezek.  xxvii.  6-18 
and  xxviii.  12  ;  Story  of  Phoenicia,  p.  108  ;  Dr.  Dollinger, 
Heidenthum  and  Judenthum,  i.  425  ;  Ellis,  Polynesian 
Researches,  section  "  Religion/'  Nat.  Races,  iii.  442  and  v. 
23  ;  Ency.  Brit.,  xvi.  208. 


PRACTICAL  ABILITY  OF  PHOENICIANS 

Rawlinson's  Story  of  Phoenicia,  pp.  38  and  346. 

FOUNDATION  OF  GADES.    EXPLORATION 

Strabo,  vol.  i.  255  (B.  iii.  c.  v.  5). — Concerning 
the   foundation   of   Gades,  the   Gaditanians   report 


CONCLUSION  265 

that  a  certain  oracle  commanded  the  Tynans  to 
found  a  colony  at  the  Pillars  of  Hercules.  Those  who 
were  sent  out  for  the  purpose  of  exploring,  when 
they  had  arrived  at  the  Straits  of  Calpe,  imagined 
that  the  capes  which  form  the  straits  were  the 
boundaries  of  the  habitable  world  as  well  as  of 
the  expedition  of  Hercules,  and  consequently  were 
what  the  oracle  termed  the  Pillars.  They  landed 
on  the  inside  of  the  straits  at  a  place  where  the  city 
of  Exitani  now  stands.  Here  they  offered  sacrifices, 
which,  however,  not  being  favourable,  they  returned. 
After  a  time  others  were  sent,  who  advanced  about 
1500  stadia  beyond  the  straits  to  an  island  conse 
crated  to  Hercules  and  lying  opposite  to  Onoba, 
a  city  of  Iberia.  Considering  that  here  were  the 
Pillars,  they  sacrificed  to  the  Gods,  butthe  sacrifices 
being  again  unfavourable  they  returned  home.  In 
the  third  voyage  they  reached  Gades  and  founded 
the  temple  in  the  eastern  part  of  the  island  and  the 
city  in  the  west.  On  this  account  some  consider 
the  capes  are  the  Pillars,  others  suppose  Gades, 
while  others  again  believe  they  lie  still  farther 
beyond  Gades. 

MOREA.    MULBERRY  LEAF 

Strabo,  vol.  ii.  5  (B.  viii.  c.  ii.  i). — The  Pelopon 
nesus  resembles  in  figure  the  leaf  of  a  plane  tree. 
Its  length  and  breadth  are  nearly  equal,  each  about 
1400  stadia. 

Footnote. — For  the  same  reason  at  a  subsequent 
period  it  obtained  the  name  of  Morea,  in  Greek 
(Mogea),  which  signifies  Mulberry,  a  species  or 
variety  of  which  tree  bears  leaves  divided  into  five 


266     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

lobes,  equal  in  number  to  the  principal  capes  of 
Peloponnesus.  Vol.  ii.  (B.  ii.  c.  i.  30) — To  compare 
the  Peloponnesus  to  a  plane  leaf. 

SAMOS  OR  SAMO 

Strabo,  ii.  168  (B.  x.  c.  ii.  17). — The  poet  also 
gives  the  name  of  Samos  to  Thracia,  which  we  now 
call  Samo-thracia.  He  was  probably  acquainted 
with  the  Ionian  Islands,  for  he  seems  to  have  been 
acquainted  with  the  Ionian  migration.  He  would 
not  otherwise  have  made  a  distinction  between 
islands  of  the  same  name,  for  in  speaking  of  Samo- 
thrace  he  makes  the  distinction  sometimes  by 
epithet — 

"  On  high  above  the  summit  of  woody  Samos  the  Thracian." 

In  the  valley  of  Alessandro  in  Cephalonia  there  is 
still  a  place  called  Samo. 

Footnote  6. — Those  are  more  entitled  to  credit 
who  say  that  the  heights  are  called  Sami  and  that 
the  island  obtained  its  name  from  this  circumstance. 

PELOPONNESUS  PRIOR  TO  PELOPS.    APIA 

Strabo,  i.  492  (B.  vii.  c.  vii.  i). — Hecateus  of 
Miletus  says  of  the  Peloponnesus  that  before  the 
time  of  the  Greeks  it  was  inhabited  by  barbarians ; 
perhaps  even  the  whole  of  Greece  was  anciently  a 
settlement  of  barbarians,  if  we  may  judge  from 
former  accounts.  For  Pelops  brought  colonists 
from  Phrygia  into  the  Peloponnesus,  which  took  his 
name.  Danaus,  King  of  Argos,  1570  B.C.,  brought 
colonists  from  Egypt,  Orgopes,  Cancones,  Pelasgi, 
Leleges,  and  other  barbarous  nations  partitioned 


CONCLUSION  267 

among  themselves  the  country  on  this  side  of  the 
isthmus. 

Footnote  2. — The  Peloponnesus  which  before  the 
arrival  of  Pelops  was  called  Apia. 

Note,  T.  C.  J. — The  Scythian  invasion  of  South- 
Eastern  Europe  took  place  about  1500  B.C.,  and 
the  probability,  therefore,  is  that  the  Peloponnesus 
received  from  them  the  name  of  Apia,  so  named 
after  their  deity  the  earth. 

ALPHABET 

Lucian,  Pharsalia,  iii,  216. — The  Phoenicians  first 
(if  belief  is  given  to  report)  ventured  to  represent 
in  rude  characters  "  the  voice  destined  to  endure/' 
Not  yet  had  Memphis  learned  to  unite  the  rushes  of 
the  stream,  and  only  animals  engraved  upon  the 
stones,  both  birds  and  wild  beasts,  kept  in  existence 
the  magic  tongues. 

Anthropology,  E.  B.  Taylor,  D.C.L.,  F.R.S.,  Apple- 
ton  &  Co.,  p.  176. — Tacitus,  in  a  passage  in 
his  Annals,  describing  the  origin  of  letters,  says 
that  "  The  Egyptians  first  depicted  thoughts  of 
the  mind  by  figures  of  animals,  which  oldest 
monuments  of  the  human  mind  are  to  be  seen 
stamped  on  the  rocks,  so  that  the  Egyptians  are 
the  inventors  of  the  letters  which  the  Phoenician 
navigators  brought  thence  to  Greece,  obtaining  the 
glory  as  if  they  had  discovered  what  really  they  had 
borrowed/'  This  account  may  be  substantially 
true,  but  it  does  not  give  the  Phoenicians  credit 
for  the  practical  good  sense  which  they  certainly 
showed,  being  strangers  and  not  bound  by  the  sacred 
traditions  of  Egypt.  No  doubt  the  Phoenicians 


268    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

or  some  of  the  Semitic  nations,  when  they  had 
learned  the  Egyptian  hieroglyphics,  saw  that  the 
picture  signs  mixed  with  the  spelt  words  had  be 
come  mere  surplusage,  and  that  all  they  really  wanted 
was  a  sign  wherewith  to  write  the  sound  of  the  word. 
Thus  was  invented  the  so-called  Phoenician  alphabet. 

Page  176. — Now  what  confirms  the  historic  fact 
that  the  Phoenicians  had  the  alphabet  first  and  that 
the  Greeks  learned  the  art  of  writing  from  them  is 
that  the  Greeks  actually  borrowed  the  Phoenician 
names  of  the  letters. 

The  adoption  of  the  alphabet  was  the  great 
movement  by  which  mankind  rose  from  barbarism 
to  civilisation. 

CADMUS,  SON  OF  AGENOR 

Strabo,  vol.  i.  493  (B.  vii.  c.  vii.  2),  footnote  4. 
— Cadmus,  son  of  Agenor,  King  of  Tyre,  arrived 
in  Bceotia,  1550  B.C.  The  citadel  of  Thebes  was 
named  after  him. 

CADMUS  BRINGS  LETTERS  INTO  GREECE 

Pliny,  vol.  ii.  220  (B.  vii.  c.  Ixvii.). — "I  have 
always  been  of  the  opinion  that  letters  were  of 
Assyrian  origin,  but  other  writers,  Gellius  for  in 
stance,  suppose  that  they  were  invented  in  Egypt  by 
Mercury.  Others  again  will  have  it  that  they  were 
discovered  by  the  Syrians  and  that  Cadmus  brought 
from  Phoenicia  sixteen  letters  into  Greece/'  &c. 

Note  49. — The  account  of  the  original  introduc 
tion  of  the  alphabet  into  Greece,  here  given,  was  the 
one  generally  adopted  in  his  time.  Most  readers 
will  be  aware  that  the  actual  invention  of  letters, 


CONCLUSION  269 

the  share  which  the  Egyptians  and  the  Phoenicians 
had  in  it,  the  identification  of  Cadmus  and  still 
more  of  Mercury  with  any  of  the  heroes  or  legis 
lators  of  antiquity,  of  whom  we  have  any  correct 
historical  data,  and  the  connection  which  the  Greek 
alphabet  had  with  those  of  other  nations,  are  among 
the  most  vexed  questions  of  literary  discussion, 
and  are  still  far  from  being  resolved  with  any  degree 
of  certainty,  &c.,  &c. 

THRACIANS 

Pliny,  vol.  i.  302  (B.  iv.  c.  xviii.). — "  Thrace  now 
follows,  divided  into  fifty  strategies  or  prefectures> 
and  to  be  reckoned  among  the  most  powerful 
nations  of  Europe/' 

OLYMPIAN  GAMES 

Pliny,  vol.  ii.  232  (B.  vii.  c.  Ivii.). — Hercules 
first  instituted  the  athletic  contests  at  Olympia. 

Footnote  33. — The  Isthmian  games  were  origi 
nally  instituted  by  Sysiphus,  King  of  Corinth  ;  after 
having  been  interrupted  for  some  time  they  were 
re-established  by  Theseus,  who  celebrated  them  in 
honour  of  Neptune. 

Note  34. — The  celebrated  Olympic  games.  Dio- 
dorus  Siculus  (B.  iv.  c.  iii.),  Pausanias,  and  other 
ancient  writers,  as  well  as  Pliny,  ascribe  their  origin 
to  Hercules.  Pausanias,  however,  says  that  some 
supposed  them  to  have  been  instituted  by  Jupiter. 

TATTOOING 

Pliny,  vol.  ii.  8  (B.  vi.  c.  iv.). — We  find  here  the 
nations  of  the  Genet ae,  the  Chalybes,  the  town  of 


270    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Cotyorum,  the   nations  of   the   Tabareni,  and   the 
Molossi  who  make  marks  upon  their  bodies. 
Note  77. — Similar  to  what  we  call  tattooing. 


SCYTHIAN  CANNIBALISM 

Strabo,  i.  461  (B.  vii.  c.  iii.  17). — "Thus  they 
say  it  was  through  ignorance  Homer  and  the 
ancients  omitted  to  speak  of  the  Scythians  and 
their  cruelty  to  strangers,  whom  they  sacrificed, 
devouring  the  flesh  and  afterwards  made  use  of  the 
skulls  as  drinking-cups,  for  which  reason  the  sea 
was  named  the  inhospitable." 


CANNIBALISM  AND  HUMAN  SACRIFICE 

Strabo,  vol.  ii.  122  (B.  vii.  c.  ii.). — We  have  al 
ready  stated  that  there  are  certain  tribes  of  the 
Scythians  and  indeed  many  other  nations  which 
feed  upon  human  flesh.  This  fact  itself  might 
perhaps  appear  incredible  did  we  not  recollect  that 
in  the  very  centre  of  the  earth  in  Italy  and  Sicily 
nations  formerly  existed  with  these  monstrous  pro 
pensities,  the  Cyclopes  and  the  Lystrygonians  for 
example  ;  also  that  very  recently  on  the  other  side  of 
the  Alps  it  was  the  custom  to  offer  human  sacrifices 
after  the  manner  of  these  nations,  and  the  difference 
is  but  small  between  sacrificing  human  beings  and 
eating  them. 

Pliny,  vol.  v.  426  (B.  xxx.  c.  iii.). — At  least  in 
the  year  of  the  city  657  Cneius  Cornelius  Lentulus 
and  P.  Licinius  Crassus,  being  consuls,  a  decree 
forbidding  human  sacrifices  was  passed  by  the 


CONCLUSION  271 

Senate,  from  which  period  the  celebration  of  these 
horrid  rites  ceased  in  public  and  for  some  time 
altogether. 

HEAD-FLATTENING  IN  SAMOA 

Samoa,  Dr.  Geo.  Turner,  p.  79. — During  the  first 
two  or  three  days  the  nurse  bestows  great  attention 
on  the  head  of  the  child  that  it  might  be  modified 
and  shaped  after  the  notions  of  propriety  and  beauty. 
The  child  was  laid  on  its  back  and  the  head  sur 
rounded  with  three  stones.  One  was  placed  close 
to  the  crown  of  the  head  and  one  on  either  side. 
The  forehead  was  then  pressed  with  the  hand  that 
it  might  be  flattened.  The  nose,  too,  was  carefully 
flattened  out,  "  Canoe  noses/'  as  they  call  them, 
being  blemishes  in  their  estimation. 

CITIES  OF  REFUGE  IN  SAMOA 

Samoa,  Dr.  Geo.  Turner,  p.  64. — "  In  another 
village  in  Upolu,  Vave  was  incarnate  in  a  pigeon 
which  was  carefully  kept  and  fed  by  the  different 
members  of  the  family  in  town.  But  the  special 
residence  of  Vave  there,  was  an  old  tree  inland  of 
the  village,  which  was  a  '  place  of  refuge '  for 
murderers  and  other  capital  offenders.  If  that  tree 
was  reached  by  the  criminal  he  was  safe,  and  the 
avenger  of  blood  could  pursue  no  further  but  await 
investigation  and  trial." 

CASSITERIDES  AND  CONCEALING  ROUTES 

Strabo,  vol.  i.  262  (B.  ii.  c.  v.  i). — "The  Cassi- 
terides  are  ten  in  number  and  lie  near  each  other 


272    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

in  the  ocean  towards  the  north  from  the  haven  of 
the  Artibari.  One  of  them  is  desert,  but  the  others 
are  inhabited  by  men  in  black  cloaks,  clad  in  tunics 
reaching  to  the  feet,  girt  about  the  breasts,  and 
walking  with  staves  resembling  the  furies  we  see 
in  tragic  representations.  They  subsist  by  their 
cattle,  leading  for  the  most  part  a  wandering  life. 
Of  the  metals  they  have  tin  and  lead,  which,  with 
skins,  they  barter  for  merchandise,  for  earthenware, 
salt,  and  brazen  vessels.  Formerly  the  Phoenicians 
alone  carried  on  this  traffic  from  Gades,  concealing 
the  passage  from  everyone,  and  when  the  Romans 
followed  a  certain  shipmaster  that  they  might  find 
the  market,  the  shipmaster,  from  jealousy,  pur 
posely  ran  his  vessel  upon  a  shoal,  leading  on  those 
who  followed  him  into  the  same  destructive  disaster. 
He  himself  escaped  by  means  of  a  fragment  of  the 
ship,  and  received  from  the  State  the  value  of  the 
cargo  he  had  lost/' 

MARRIAGE  OF  DECEASED  BROTHER'S  WIFE 
IN  SAMOA 

Samoa,  Dr.  Geo.  Turner,  p.  98. — "  The  brother 
of  a  deceased  husband  considered  himself  entitled 
to  have  his  brother's  wife  and  to  be  regarded  by  the 
orphan  children  as  their  father.  If  he  was  already 
married  she  would  nevertheless  live  with  him  as  a 
second  wife." 

CONCUBINAGE 

Page  96. — "  When  the  newly  married  woman 
took  up  her  abode  in  the  family  of  her  husband  she 
was  attended  by  a  daughter  of  her  brother,  who  was 
in  fact  a  concubine." 


CONCLUSION  273 

POLYGAMY 

Page  96. — The  marriage  ceremony  being  such  a 
prolific  source  of  festivity  and  profit  to  the  chief  and 
his  friends,  the  latter,  whether  he  was  disposed  to 
do  it  or  not,  often  urged  on  another  and  another 
repetition  of  what  we  have  described.  They  took 
the  thing  almost  into  their  own  hands,  looked  out 
for  a  match  in  a  rich  family,  and,  if  that  family  was 
agreeable  to  it,  the  affair  was  pushed  on  whether 
or  not  the  daughter  was  disposed  to  it.  She,  too, 
as  a  matter  of  etiquette,  must  be  attended  by  her 
complement  of  one  or  more  young  women.  Accord 
ing  to  this  system  a  chief  might  have  ten  or  a  dozen 
wives  and  concubines  in  a  short  time. 


TOTEMISM   IN   THE   NEW   HEBRIDES 

Samoa,  Dr.  Geo.  Turner,  p.  334. — Household 
gods  were  supposed  to  be  present  in  the  shape  of 
stones,  trees,  fish,  and  fowl.  These  incarnations 
were  never  eaten  by  their  respective  worshippers. 
In  oaths  and  imprecations  they  invoked  punish 
ment  from  the  gods.  Cannibalism  was  restricted  to 
bodies  taken  in  war.  Adultery  and  murder  were 
punished  by  death. 

STEAM-BATHING  IN  TAHITI 

Ellis'  Polynesian  Researches,  vol.  iii.  41. — The 
natives  had  no  method  of  using  the  warm  bath,  but 
often  seated  the  patient  on  a  pile  of  heated  stones 
strewn  over  with  green  herbs  and  leaves,  and  kept 
them  covered  with  a  thick  cloth  till  the  most  profuse 

s 


274    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

perspiration  was  produced,  something  like  that  pro 
duced  by  the  fashionable  vapour  bath.  In  this 
state,  to  our  great  astonishment,  at  the  most  critical 
season  of  sickness,  the  patient  would  leave  the  heap 
of  stones  and  plunge  into  the  sea,  near  which  the 
oven  was  usually  located.  Though  the  shock  must 
have  been  very  great,  they  appear  to  sustain  no 
injury  from  the  transition. 

GOLD  IN  ARABIA 

Pliny,  vol.  ii.  90  (B.  vi.  c.  xxxii.). — The  Sabaei 
are  the  richest  of  all  in  the  great  abundance  of  spice- 
bearing  groves,  the  mines  of  gold,  the  streams  for 
irrigation,  and  the  ample  produce  of  honey  and  wax. 

Footnote  20. — Arabia  at  present  yields  no  gold 
and  very  little  silver.  The  Queen  of  Sheba  is  men 
tioned  as  bringing  gold  to  Solomon  (i  Kings  x.  2 
and  2  Chron.  ix.  i).  Artemadorus  and  Diodorus 
Siculus  make  mention  on  the  Arabian  Gulf  of  the 
Sabae,  the  Alilaei,  and  the  Gessandi,  in  whose  terri 
tories  native  gold  was  found.  These  last  people, 
who  did  not  know  its  value,  were  in  the  habit  of 
bringing  it  to  their  neighbours  the  Sabaei,  and  ex 
changing  it  for  articles  of  copper  and  iron. 

GOLD,  EBONY,  AND  IVORY 

Vol.  iii.  108  (B.  xii.  c.  viii.). — Virgil  (B.  ii.  c.  xi.) 
has  spoken  in  glowing  terms  of  the  ebony  tree,  one 
of  the  few  which  are  peculiar  to  India,  and  he  further 
informs  us  that  it  will  grow  in  no  other  country. 
Herodotus,  however,  has  preferred  to  ascribe  it  to 
Ethiopia,  and  states  that  the  people  of  that  country 


CONCLUSION  275 

were  in  the  habit  of  paying  to  the  King  of  Persia 
every  third  year,  by  way  of  tribute,  one  hundred 
billets  of  ebony  wood  together  with  a  certain  quan 
tity  of  gold  and  ivory.  Nor  ought  we  here  to  omit 
the  fact,  since  the  author  has  so  stated  it  that  the 
Ethiopians  were  also  in  the  habit  of  paying  by  way 
of  tribute  twenty  large  elephants'  teeth. 

PETRA  TO  RHINOCOLURA  IN  PHOENICIA 

Strabo,  vol.  iii.  211  (B.  xvi.  c.  iv.  24). — Mer 
chandise  conveyed  from  Leuce,  comes  to  Petra, 
thence  to  Rhinocolura  in  Phoenicia  near  Egypt,  and 
thence  to  other  nations.  But  at  present  the  greater 
part  is  transported  by  the  Nile  to  Alexandria.  It  is 
brought  down  from  Arabia  and  India  to  Myus  Her- 
mus ;  it  is  then  conveyed  on  camels  to  the  Thebais, 
situated  on  a  canal  of  the  Nile  and  Alexandria. 

TYLOS  AND  ARADOS 

Southern  Arabia,  by  Theodore  Bent  (Smith, 
Elder  &  Co.,  1900). 

Page  20. — "  Leaving  the  palm  groves  of  the 
Portuguese  fortress  behind  us  we  re-entered  the 
desert  to  the  south-west,  and  just  beyond  the  village 
of  Ali  we  came  across  that  which  is  the  great  curiosity 
of  Bahrein,  to  investigate  which  was  our  real  object 
in  visiting  the  island,  for  there  begins  that  vast  sea 
of  sepulchral  mounds,  the  great  Necropolis  of  an 
unknown  race  which  extends  far  and  wide  across 
the  plain.  The  village  of  Ali  forms,  as  it  were,  the 
culminating  point ;  it  lies  just  on  the  borders  of  the 
dark  groves,  and  there  the  mounds  reach  an  eleva- 


276    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

tion  of  fifty  feet  above  the  level  of  the  desert  and 
some  more  circular  heaps  of  stone.  There  are  many 
thousands  of  these  tumuli  extending  over  an  area  of 
mounds  in  other  parts  of  the  island,  and  a  few 
solitary  ones  are  to  be  found  on  the  adjacent  islets 
on  Moharik,  Arad,  and  Sitrah. 

Complete  uncertainty  exists  as  to  the  origin  of 
these  mounds  and  the  people  who  constructed  them, 
but  from  classical  references  and  the  result  of  our 
own  work  there  can  be  no  doubt  that  they  are  of 
Phoenician  origin.  Herodotus,  ii.  89,  gives  us  a 
tradition  current  in  his  time  that  the  forefathers  of 
the  Phoenician  race  came  from  these  parts.  The 
Phoenicians  themselves  believed  in  it.  It  is  their 
own  account  of  themselves,  says  Herodotus,  and 
Strabo  (B.  xvi.  c.  iii.  4)  brings  further  testimony 
to  bear  on  the  subject,  stating  that  two  of  the 
islands  called  Bahrein  were  called  Tyros  and  Arados. 
Pliny  follows  in  the  steps  of  Strabo,  but  calls  the 
islands  Tylos  instead  of  Tyros,  which  may  be  an 
error  in  spelling  or  may  be  owing  to  the  universal 
confusion  of  R  and  L. 

Ptolemy  in  his  map  places  Gerrha,  the  mart  of 
the  Indian  trade  and  the  starting-point  for  caravans, 
on  the  great  road  across  Arabia  on  the  coast,  just 
opposite  to  those  islands  near  where  the  town  of 
El  Katif  now  is,  and  accepts  Strabo  and  Pliny's 
names  for  the  Bahrein  Islands,  calling  them  Tharros, 
Tylos,  or  Tyros  and  Arados.  The  fact  is  that  all 
information  on  the  islands  prior  to  Portuguese  occu 
pation  comes  from  the  Periplus  of  Nearchus.  Era 
tosthenes,  a  naval  officer  of  Alexander,  states  that 
the  gulf  was  10,000  stadia  long  from  Cape  Armoaum, 
i.e.  Hermuz  to  Teredon  (Koweit)  and  the  mouth  of 


CONCLUSION  277 

the  Euphrates.  Androsthenes  of  Thasos,  who  was 
of  the  company  of  Nearchus,  made  an  independent 
survey  of  the  gulf  close  to  the  islands  of  Tylos  and 
Arados,  which  have  temples  like  those  of  the  Phoe 
nicians,  who  were  (the  inhabitants  told  him)  colonists, 
had  a  town  called  Sidon  or  Sidolona  in  the  gulf  which 
he  visited,  and  on  an  island  called  Tyriri  was  shown 
the  tomb  of  Erythras,  which  he  describes  as  an 
elevated  hillock  covered  with  palms  just  like  our 
mounds,  and  Erythras  was  the  king  who  gave  his 
name  to  the  gulf.  Justin  accepts  the  migration 
from  the  gulf  as  certain,  and  M.  Ren  an  says  :  '  The 
primitive  abode  of  the  Phoenicians  must  be  placed 
on  the  lower  Euphrates  in  the  centre  of  the  great 
commercial  and  maritime  establishments  of  the 
Persian  Gulf/'  As  for  the  temples  there  are  no 
traces  of  them  left,  and  this  is  also  the  case  in 
Syrian  Phoenicia ;  doubtless  they  were  all  built 
of  wood,  which  will  account  for  their  disap 
pearance. 

As  we  ourselves,  during  the  course  of  our  exca 
vations,  brought  to  light  objects  of  distinctly  Phoe 
nician  origin,  there  would  appear  to  be  no  longer 
any  room  for  doubt  that  the  mounds  which  lay 
before  us  were  a  vast  Necropolis  of  this  mercantile 
race.  If  so  one  of  two  suppositions  must  be  correct, 
either,  firstly,  that  the  Phoenicians  originally  lived 
here  before  they  migrated  to  the  Mediterranean,  and 
that  this  was  the  land  of  Punt  from  which  "  Punic  " 
was  derived,  a  land  of  palms  from  which  the  race 
got  the  distorted  Greek  appellation  of  Phoenicia,  or, 
secondly,  that  these  islands  were  looked  upon  by 
them  as  a  sacred  spot  for  the  burial  of  their  dead, 
as  the  Hindoos  look  upon  the  Ganges  and  the 


278    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

Persians  regard  the  shrines  of  Kerbila  and  Mished. 
I  am  much  more  inclined  to  the  former  supposition, 
judging  from  the  mercantile  importance  of  the 
Bahrein  Islands  and  the  excellent  school  they  must 
have  been  for  a  race  which  was  to  penetrate  to  all 
corners  of  the  globe,  to  brave  the  dangers  of  the 
open  Atlantic,  and  to  reach  the  shores  of  Britain 
in  their  trading  ventures,  and  if  nomenclature  goes 
for  anything,  the  name  of  Tyros  and  the  still  exist 
ing  name  of  Arad  ought  to  confirm  us  in  our 
belief. 


TYRE,  ARADUS,  AND  SIDON  FROM  PERSIAN 
GULF 

Strabo,  vol.  iii.  187  (B.  xvi.  c.  iii.  4). — On  sailing 
further  there  are  other  islands,  Tyre  and  Aradus, 
which  have  temples  resembling  those  of  the  Phoe 
nicians.  The  inhabitants  of  these  islands  say  that 
the  inhabitants  and  cities  bearing  the  same  name  as 
those  of  the  Phoenicians  are  their  own  colonies. 
These  islands  are  distant  from  Teredon  ten  days' 
sail  and  from  the  promontory  at  the  mouth  of  the 
gulf  at  Macse  one  day's  sail. 

Footnote  to  above. — "  Besides  the  islands  Tyre 
and  Aradus,  there  existed,  even  at  the  time  of 
Alexander  and  near  the  present  Cape  Gherd,  a  city 
called  Sidon  or  Siddona  which  was  visited  by 
Nearchus,  as  may  be  seen  in  his  Periplus.  The 
Phoenician  inhabitants  of  these  places  appear  to 
have  afterward  removed  to  the  western  side  of  the 
Persian  Gulf  and  to  the  Bahrein  Islands,  to  which 
they  give  the  names  Tylos  or  Tyre  and  Aradus. 


CONCLUSION  279 

The  latter  name  still  exists  ;  it  was  from  this  place 
that  the  Phoenicians  moved  to  establish  themselves 
on  the  shores  of  the  Mediterranean,  and  transferred 
the  name  Sidon,  the  ancient  capital,  and  those  of 
Tyre  and  Aradus  to  the  new  cities  which  they  there 
founded. " 


GERRHA  AND  TYLOS  AND  PEARL  FISHERIES 

Strabo,  vol.  iii.  186  (B.  xvi.  c.  iii.  3). — Having 
coasted  along  the  shore  of  Arabia  to  the  distance 
of  2400  stadia,  there  lies  in  a  deep  gulf  a  city  of  the 
name  of  Gerrha  belonging  to  Chaldaean  exiles  from 
Babylon,  who  inhabit  the  district  in  which  salt  is 
found  and  who  have  houses  constructed  of  salt. 
As  scales  of  salt,  separated  by  the  burning  heat  of 
the  sun,  are  constantly  falling  off,  the  houses  are 
sprinkled  with  water  and  the  walls  are  thus  kept 
firmly  together.  This  city  is  distant  200  stadia 
from  the  sea.  The  merchants  of  Gerrha  generally 
carry  the  Arabian  merchandise  and  aromatics  by 
land,  but  Aristobulus  says,  on  the  contrary,  that 
they  frequently  travel  into  Babylonia  on  rafts  and 
thence  sail  up  the  Euphrates  to  Thapsacus  with  their 
cargoes,  and  afterwards  carry  them  by  land  to  all 
parts  of  the  country. 

Pliny,  vol.  ii.  84  (B.  vi.  c.  iii.  2). — Here  we  find 
the  city  of  Gerrha  five  miles  in  circumference  with 
towers  built  of  square  blocks  of  salt.  Fifty  miles 
from  the  coast,  lying  in  the  region  of  Attene  and 
opposite  to  Gerrha,  is  the  island  of  Tylos,  as  many 
miles  distant  from  the  shore  ;  it  is  famous  for  the 
vast  number  of  its  pearls  and  has  a  town  of  the 
same  name. 


280    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

PALMYRA 

Pliny,  vol.  i.  445  (B.  v.  c.  ii.),  Note  4. — It  is  so 
called  from  the  circumstance  that  Palmyra  stood  in 
the  midst  of  (a  grove  of  palm  trees)  them.  It  was 
built  by  King  Solomon  in  an  oasis  of  the  desert  in 
the  midst  of  palm  groves  from  which  it  received 
its  Greek  name,  which  was  a  translation  of  the 
Hebrew  "  Tadmor,"  the  city  of  palm  trees.  It 
lay  a  considerable  distance  from  the  Euphrates.  Its 
site  presents  considerable  ruins,  but  they  are  all  of 
the  Roman  period  and  greatly  inferior  to  those  of 
Baalbek  or  Heliapolis. 


CARAVAN  ROUTE  FROM  YEMEN  TO 
AND  GERRHA 

Strabo,  vol.  iii.  191  (B.  xvi.  c.  iv.  4). — Catabania 
(Yemen)  produces  frankincense  and  Chatramotibes 
(Hydramaut)  myrrh  there,  and  other  aromatics  are 
the  medium  of  exchange  with  the  merchants. 
Merchants  arrive  in  seventy  days  at  Minaea  from 
^Elana.  ^Elana  is  a  city  on  the  other  recess  of  the 
Arabian  Gulf,  which  is  called  ^Elanites,  opposite 
to  Gerrha  as  we  have  before  described  it.  The 
Gerrhsei  arrive  in  Hydramaut  in  forty  days." 


PHOENICIAN  OR  POLE  STAR 

Strabo,  vol.  i.  6  (B.  i.  c.  vi.). — "  Let  no  one  blame 
Homer's  ignorance  for  being  merely  acquainted 
with  one  '  Bear '  when  there  are  two.  It  is  pos 
sible  that  the  second  was  not  considered  a  constel- 


CONCLUSION  281 

lation  until  the  Phoenicians  specially  designated  it, 
and  employing  it  in  their  navigation  it  became 
known  to  the  Greeks." 


THE  DIOSCURI  (CASTOR  AND  POLLUX) 

Strabo,  vol.  i.  76  (B.  i.  c.  iii.  2). — "  Castor  and 
Pollux,  the  guardians  of  the  sea  and  deliverers  of 
sailors.  The  sovereignty  of  the  seas  exercised  by 
Minos  and  the  navigation  carried  on  by  the  Phoe 
nicians  is  well  known.  A  little  after  the  period  of 
the  Trojan  War  they  had  penetrated  beyond  the 
Pillars  of  Hercules  and  founded  cities  on  the  African 
coast/' 

BRIDGE  OVER  THE  ISTER  OR  DANUBE 

Strabo,  vol.  i.  469  (B.  viii.  c.  iii.  15). — "  Near 
the  mouth  of  the  Danube  is  the  large  island  called 
Pence.  This  the  Bastarnae  possessed  and  were 
hence  called  Pencini.  There  are  also  other  islands 
much  smaller,  some  above  this  and  others  nearer 
the  sea.  The  Danube  has  seven  mouths ;  the 
largest  is  called  the  sacred  mouth,  the  passage  by 
which  to  Pence  is  120  stadia.  At  the  lower  end  of 
this  island  Darius  made  his  bridge.  It  might  like 
wise  have  been  constructed  at  the  upper  part. 
This  is  the  first  mouth  on  the  left-hand  side  as  you 
sail  into  the  Black  Sea." 

QUIPPAS  IN  THE  PACIFIC 

Samoa,  Dr.  Geo.  Turner,  p.  302. — "  Nui  or 
Netherlands  Islands."  "  King  Tapakea  praised 
Mano'o  for  bravery  and  called  out  to  the  onlookers 


282    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

on  the  beach  to  mark  Mano'o  as  victorious.  The 
marking  was  done  by  setting  up  a  cocoanut  leaf 
and  tying  a  knot  on  top  of  it.  Tying  a  number  of 
knots  on  a  piece  of  cord  was  also  a  common  way 
of  writing  and  remembering  things  in  the  absence 
of  a  written  language  among  the  South  Sea 
Islanders/' 

TANNING 

Pliny,  vol.  iii.  200  (B.  xiii.  c.  xxxiv.). — In  the 
vicinity  of  Carthage  is  claimed  more  particularly 
as  the  home  of  the  Punic  apple,  though  by  some  it 
is  called  granatium.  The  skin,  while  the  fruit  is 
still  sour,  is  held  in  high  esteem  for  tanning  leather. 


AMERICA 

Nat.  Races,  vol.  ii.  486,  Nahuas. — "  The  skins 
of  animals  killed  by  the  Nahua  hunters  were  tanned 
both  with  and  without  hair  by  a  process  of  which 
the  authorities  say  nothing,  although  universally 
praising  the  results.  The  leather  was  used  in  some 
cases  as  a  sort  of  parchment,  but  oftener  for  articles 
of  dress,  ornament,  or  armour." 


CURVED  THROW-STICK  OR  BOOMERANG 

Pliny,  vol.  v.  47  (B.  xxiv.  c.  Ixxii.). — "  The  tree 
called  '  aquefolia '  planted  in  town  or  country  houses 
is  a  preservative  against  sorceries  and  spells.  The 
blossom  of  it,  according  to  Pythagoras,  congeals 
water,  and  a  staff  made  of  the  wood,  if  when  thrown 
at  any  animal  for  want  of  strength  in  the  party 


CONCLUSION  283 

throwing  it,  falls  short  of  the  mark,  will  roll  back 
again  towards  the  thrower  of  its  own  accord,  so 
remarkable  are  the  properties  of  this  tree.  The 
smoke  of  the  yew  kills  rats  and  mice/' 

Note  82. — "  One  would  be  induced  to  think  that 
this  story  is  derived  from  some  vague  account  of 
the  properties  of  the  boomerang.  Although  sup 
posed  by  many  to  have  been  the  invention  of  the 
natives  of  Australia,  representations  of  it  are  found 
on  the  sculptures  of  Nineveh.  It  is  not  improbable 
that  Pythagoras  may  have  heard  of  it  from  the 
Magi  during  his  travels  in  the  East." 

Vol.  iii.  253   (B.  viii.  c.  vii.),  see   footnote   42. 

'  The  exercise  with  the  boomerang,  which  was  known 

to  the  ancient  Assyrians  and  has  been  borrowed  in 

modern  times  from  the  people  of  Australia,  seems 

to  have  been  somewhat  similar  to  this." 


ARROW  POISONING 

Pliny,  vol.  iii.  97  (B.  xi.  c.  cxv.). — The  Scythians 
dip  their  arrows  in  the  poison  of  serpents  and  human 
blood;  against  this  frightful  composition  there  is 
no  remedy,  for  with  the  slightest  touch  it  is  pro 
ductive  of  instant  death." 


AMERICA 

Nat.  Races,  vol.  i.  436,  Californians. — "  Arrows 
are  occasionally  poisoned  by  plunging  them  into  a 
liver  which  has  previously  been  bitten  by  a  rattle 
snake." 

Vol.  i.  579. — "  The  Ceris,  Jovas,  and  other 
tribes  smeared  the  points  of  their  arrows  with  a 


284    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

very  deadly  poison,  but  how  it  was  applied  it  is 
difficult  to  determine.  Some  travellers  say  that 
the  poison  was  taken  from  rattlesnakes  and  other 
venomous  reptiles,  which  by  teasing  were  incited 
to  strike  their  fangs  into  the  liver  of  a  cow  or  deer 
which  was  presented  to  them,  after  which  it  was 
left  to  putrefy,  and  the  arrows,  being  dipped  into 
the  poisonous  mass,  were  placed  in  the  sun  to  dry, 
but  other  writers  again  assert  that  the  poison  was 
produced  from  a  vegetable  substance.  The  wound 
inflicted  by  the  point,  however  slight,  is  said  to  have 
caused  instant  death." 


POISONS 

Nat.  Races,  vol.  i.  762, — "  Different  varieties  of 
poisons  have  been  described  by  writers  and  travellers. 
Herrera  speaks  of  one  which  he  says  was  made  of 
certain  green  roots  found  along  the  coast,  which 
were  burnt  in  earthen  pipkins  and  mixed  with  a 
species  of  black-ant ;  to  this  composition  were  added 
large  spiders,  some  hairy  caterpillars,  the  wings  of 
a  bat,  and  the  head  and  tail  of  a  sea-fish  called 
tavorino,  very  venomous,  besides  toads,  the  tails 
of  snakes,  and  manzanillas. 

"  All  these  ingredients  were  set  over  a  fire  in  an 
open  field  and  well  boiled  in  pots  by  a  slave  till 
they  were  reduced  to  a  proper  consistency.  The 
unfortunate  slave  who  attended  to  the  boiling 
almost  invariably  died  from  the  fumes.  Another 
poisonous  composition  is  spoken  of  as  having  been 
made  of  fourteen  different  ingredients  and  another 
of  twenty-five.  One  that  killed  in  three  days, 
another  in  five,  and  another  later,  &c." 


CONCLUSION  285 

BURIAL  OF  SCYTHIAN  KINGS 

Herodotus,  iv.  73. — "  The  body  of  the  dead  king 
is  laid  in  the  grave  prepared  for  it,  stretched  upon  a 
mattress,  spears  are  fixed  in  the  ground  on  either 
side  of  the  corpse,  and  beams  are  stretched  across 
above  it  to  form  a  roof  which  is  covered  with  a 
thatch  of  osier  twigs.  In  the  open  space  around 
the  body  of  the  king  they  burn  one  of  his  concu 
bines,  first  strangling  her,  and  also  his  cupbearer, 
his  cook,  his  groom,  his  lacquey,  his  messenger, 
some  of  his  horses,  firstlings  of  all  his  possessions, 
and  some  golden  cups,  for  they  use  neither  silver 
nor  brass.  After  this  they  set  to  work  and  raise 
a  vast  mound  above  the  grave,  all  of  them  vying 
with  each  other  and  seeking  to  make  it  as  tall  as 
possible/' 

AMERICA 

Prehistoric  Races,  Foster,  Tabuer  &  Co.,  1874. 
"  Greek  Grave  Mounds/' — "  Another  observer,  Dr. 
Clemens,  states  that  in  carrying  on  the  horizontal 
excavations  at  a  distance  of  twelve  or  fifteen  feet 
were  found  numerous  masses  composed  of  charcoal 
and  burnt  bones.  On  reaching  the  lower  vault 
from  the  top  it  was  determined  to  enlarge  it  for  the 
accommodation  of  visitors,  when  ten  more  skeletons 
were  found. 

These  facts  show  that  the  principal  occupant 
of  this  mound,  as  indicated  by  its  magnitude,  was  a 
royal  personage,  and  can  we  not  draw  the  further 
inference  that  many  of  his  attendants  were  strangled 
and  others  were  sacrificed  as  a  burnt  offering  ? 
Have  we  not  explanation,  indeed,  of  many  of  these 


286    THE    PHCENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

facts  in  the  ceremonies  which  attended  the  burial 
of  a  Scythian  king  as  described  by  the  Father  of 
history." 

PURPLE  DYE 

Pliny,  ii.  44  (B.  ix.  c.  Ixi.). — "There  are  two 
kinds  of  fish  that  produce  the  purple  colours ;  the 
elements  in  both  are  the  same,  the  combinations 
only  are  different.  The  smaller  fish  is  that  which 
is  called  '  buccinum/  from  its  resemblance  to  the 
conch  by  which  the  buccina  or  trumpet  is  pro 
duced,  and  to  this  circumstance  it  owes  its  name  ; 
the  opening  of  it  is  round.  The  other  fish  is  known 
as  the  purpura  or  purple,  and  has  a  grooved  and 
projecting  muzzle,  which,  being  tibulated  on  one 
side,  in  the  interior  forms  a  passage  for  the  tongue. 
The  buccinum  attaches  itself  only  to  crags  and  is 
gathered  about  rocky  places. 

"  Purples  have  another  name,  that  of  pelagae  ; 
there  are  numerous  kinds  of  them  which  differ  only 
in  their  elements  and  place  of  abode,  &c." 


COTTON 

Strabo,  vol.  iii.  86  (B.  xv.  c.  i.  23). — Aristobulus 
says  of  the  wool-bearing  trees  that  the  flower  pod 
contains  a  kernel  which  is  taken  out  and  the  re 
mainder  is  combed  like  wool. 


COTTON  ON  ISLAND  OF  TYLOS 

Pliny,    vol.    iii.    117    (B.   xii.   c.    xxi.). — On   an 
elevated  plateau  on  the  island  we  find  trees  that  bear 


CONCLUSION  287 

wool  but  of  a  different  nature  from  those  of  Seres  of 
India,  as  in  these  trees  the  leaves  bear  nothing  at 
all,  and  indeed  might  very  readily  be  taken  for  those 
of  the  vine  were  it  not  that  they  are  of  smaller 
size.  They  bear  a  kind  of  gourd  about  the  size  of 
a  quince  which,  when  arrived  at  maturity,  bursts 
asunder  and  discloses  a  ball  of  down  from  which  a 
costly  kind  of  linen  cloth  is  made/' 

Note  2 — Cottonei. — To  this  resemblance  of  its 
fruit  to  the  quince  the  cotton  tree  which  is  here 
alluded  to  not  improbably  owes  its  modern  name. 

Pliny,  vol.  iii.  108  (B.  xii.  c.  viii.). — Cotton 
trees.  "  In  describing  the  country  of  the  Seres  we 
have  already  made  mention  of  the  wool-bearing 
trees  which  it  produces,  and  we  have  likewise 
touched  upon  the  extraordinary  magnitude  of  the 
trees  of  India/' 

SIDONIAN  ASTRONOMY  AND  ARITHMETIC 

Strabo,  vol.  iii.  173  (B.  xvi.  c.  ii.  24). — The 
Sidonians  are  said  by  historians  to  excel  in  various 
kinds  of  art,  as  the  words  of  Homer  (//.  xxiii.  743) 
also  imply.  Besides  they  cultivate  science  and 
study  astronomy  and  arithmetic,  to  which  they  were 
led  by  the  application  of  numbers  and  night  sailing, 
each  of  which  branches  of  knowledge  concerns  the 
merchant  and  the  seaman.  In  the  same  manner 
the  Egyptians  were  led  to  the  invention  of  geometry 
by  the  mensuration  of  ground,  which  was  required 
in  consequence  of  the  Nile  confounding,  by  its 
overflow,  the  respective  boundaries  of  the  country. 
It  is  thought  that  geometry  was  introduced  into 
Greece  from  Egypt  and  astronomy  and  arithmetic 


288    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

from  Phoenicia.  At  present  the  best  opportunities 
are  afforded  in  these  cities  of  acquiring  a  knowledge 
of  these  and  of  all  other  branches  of  knowledge. 


TIDES 

Strabo,  vol.  i.  259  (B.  iii.  c.  v.  8). — "  I  cannot 
tell  how  it  is  that  Posidonius,  who  describes  the 
Phoenicians  as  sagacious  in  other  things,  should  have 
attributed  to  them  folly  rather  than  shrewdness, 
&c."  This  passage  refers  to  observations  on  the 
causes  producing  spring  and  neap  tides. 


VOYAGES  OF  EXPLORATION 

Pliny,  vol.  i.  98  (B.  ii.  c.  Ixvii.).— All  of  this 
chapter  refers  to  the  exploration  of  the  Asiatic  and 
European  seas.  "  On  the  other  side  of  Gades,  pro 
ceeding  from  the  same  western  point,  a  great  part 
of  the  southern  ocean  along  Mauritania  has  now 
been  navigated.  Indeed  the  greater  part  of  this 
region,  as  well  as  of  the  East  as  far  as  the  Arabian 
Gulf,  was  surveyed  in  consequence  of  Alexander's 
victories.  When  Caius  Caesar,  the  son  of  Augustus, 
had  the  conduct  of  affairs  in  that  country  it  is  said 
that  they  found  the  remains  of  a  Spanish  vessel 
that  had  been  wrecked  there.  While  the  power  of 
Carthage  was  at  its  height  Hanno  published  an  ac 
count  of  a  voyage  which  he  had  made  from  Gades  to 
the  extremities  of  Arabia  (Hood,  ii.  393).  Hamilico 
also  was  sent  about  the  same  time  to  explore  the 
remote  parts  of  Europe.  Besides  we  learn  from 
Cornelius  Nepos  that  one  Eudoxus,  a  contemporary 


CONCLUSION  289 

of  his  when  he  was  flying  from  King  Lathyrus,  set 
out  from  the  Arabian  Gulf  and  was  carried  as  far 
as  Gades." 

SPEEDY  VOYAGES 

Pliny,  vol.  iv.  136  (B.  xix.  c.  i.). — "To  think 
that  there  is  here  a  plant,  flax,  which  brings  Egypt 
in  close  proximity  to  Italy,  so  much  so  in  fact  that 
Gaberius  and  Balbillus,  both  of  them  prefects  of 
Egypt,  made  the  passage  to  Alexandria  from  the 
Straits  of  Sicily,  the  one  in  six  days  and  the  other 
in  five.  It  was  only  this  last  summer  that  Valerius 
Marianus,  a  senator  of  Praetorian  rank,  reached 
Alexandria  from  Puteoli  in  eight  days  and  that  too 
with  a  very  moderate  breeze  all  the  time.  To  think 
that  there  is  a  plant  which  brings  Gades  near  the 
Pillars  of  Hercules  within  six  days  of  Ostia,  '  Nearer 
Spain '  within  three,  the  province  of  Gallia  Narbo- 
nensis  within  two,  and  Africa  within  one,  this  last 
passage  having  been  made  by  C.  Flavius  when 
legate  of  Vibius  Crispus,  the  proconsul,  and  that 
too  with  little  or  no  wind  to  favour  the  passage/' 


KNOWLEDGE  OF  THE  SPHERICITY  OF  THE  EARTH 

Strabo,  vol.  i.  78  (B.  i.  c.  iii.  3). — "  Again,  having 
discoursed  on  the  advance  of  knowledge  respecting 
the  geography  of  the  inhabited  earth  between  the 
time  of  Alexander  and  the  period  when  he  was 
writing,  Erastosthenes  goes  into  a  description  of 
the  figure  of  the  earth,  an  account  of  which  would 
have  been  very  suitable,  but  of  the  whole  earth 
which  should  certainly  have  been  given  too,  but  not 
hi  this  disordered  manner.  He  proceeds  to  tell  us 

T 


290    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

that  the  earth  is  spheroidal,  not  however  perfectly 
so,  inasmuch  as  it  has  certain  irregularities.  He 
then  enlarges  on  the  successive  changes  in  its  form 
occasioned  by  water,  fire,  earthquake,  eruptions, 
and  the  like,  all  of  which  is  entirely  out  of  place, 
for  the  spheroidal  form  of  the  whole  earth  is  the  re 
sult  of  the  system  of  the  universe,  and  the  phenomena 
which  he  mentions  do  not  in  the  least  change  its 
general  form,  such  little  matters  being  entirely  lost 
in  the  great  mass  of  the  earth/' 

GADES  AND  ERYTHREA 

Pliny,  vol.  i.  368  (B.  iv.  c.  xxxvi.).— "  At  the 
very  commencement  of  Baetica  and  twenty-five  miles 
from  the  Straits  of  Gades  is  the  island  of  Gades, 
twelve  miles  long  and  three  broad,  as  Polybius  states 
in  his  writings.  At  its  nearest  part  it  is  700  feet 
distant  from  the  mainland,  while  in  the  remaining 
portion  it  is  more  than  seven  miles.  Its  circum 
ference  is  fifteen  miles.  On  the  other  side,  which 
looks  towards  Spain,  at  about  one  hundred  paces 
distant,  is  another  long  island  three  miles  wide,  on 
which  the  original  city  of  Gades  stood.  By  Ephorus 
and  Philistides  it  is  called  Erythrea.  It  is  called 
Erythrea  because  the  Tyrians,  the  original  ancestors 
of  the  Carthaginians,  were  said  to  have  come  from 
the  Erythrean  or  Red  Sea.  In  the  island  Geryon  is 
by  some  thought  to  have  dwelt,  whose  herds  were 
carried  off  by  Hercules/' 

TYRE.    NAVIGATION  AND  DYEING 

Strabo,  vol.  iii.  172  (B.  xvi.  c.  ii.  25). — "Tyre  is 
wholly  an  island  built  in  the  same  manner  as  Aradus. 


CONCLUSION  291 

It  is  joined  to  the  continent  by  a  mound  which 
Alexander  raised  when  he  besieged  it.  It  has  two 
harbours,  one  close  the  other  open,  which  is  called 
the  Egyptian  harbour.  The  houses  here,  it  is  said, 
consist  of  many  stories,  of  more  even  than  Rome. 
On  the  occasion,  therefore,  of  an  earthquake  the 
city  was  nearly  demolished.  It  sustained  great 
injury  when  it  was  taken  by  Alexander,  but  it  rose 
above  these  misfortunes  and  recovered  itself  both 
by  the  skill  of  the  people  in  navigation,  in  which  art 
the  Phoenicians  in  general  have  always  excelled  all 
nations,  and  by  their  expertness  in  purple-dye  manu 
factures.  The  Tyrian  murex  from  which  dye  is  pro 
cured  is  caught  near  the  coast,  and  the  Tyrians 
have  in  great  abundance  other  requisites  for  dyeing. 
The  great  number  of  dyeworks  renders  the  city  un 
pleasant  as  a  place  of  residence,  but  the  superior 
skill  of  the  people  in  the  practice  of  this  art  is  the 
source  of  its  wealth/' 

SYSTEM  OF  INTERCALATION  AND  DIVISION  OF 
THE  YEAR 

Herodotus,  ii.  4. — "  But  as  concerns  human  effort 
they  agree  with  one  another  in  the  following  account, 
that  the  Egyptians  were  the  first  to  discover  the  year 
which  they  divided  into  twelve  parts,  and  they  say 
that  they  made  the  discovery  from  the  stars,  and 
so  far  I  think  that  they  act  more  wisely  than  the 
Grecians,  in  that  the  Grecians  insert  an  intercalary 
month  every  year  on  account  of  the  seasons, 
whereas  the  Egyptians  reckon  twelve  months  of 
thirty  days  each  and  add  five  days  each  year  above 
that  number,  and  so  with  them  the  circle  of  the 
seasons  comes  round  to  the  same  point/' 


292    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

MEXICO 

Nat.  Races,  vol.  ii.  508. — "The  civil  year  was 
again  divided  into  eighteen  months  and  five  days. 
Each  month  had  its  particular  name,  but  the  five 
extra  days  were  only  designated  unlucky  days/' 

PHOENICIANS  IN  BRITAIN  AND  NORWAY, 
1500-1200  B.C. 

Prehistoric  Times,  Sir  John  Lubbock,  Appleton 
&  Co.,  1878,  p.  73. — "  We  are  therefore  surely  quite 
justified  in  concluding  that  between  1500  B.C.  and 
1200  B.C.  the  Phoenicians  were  already  acquainted 
with  the  mineral  fields  of  Spain  and  Britain,  and 
under  these  circumstances  it  is,  I  think,  more  than 
probable  that  they  pushed  their  explorations  still 
further  in  search  of  other  shores  as  rich  in  mineral 
wealth  as  ours.  Indeed  we  must  remember  that 
amber,  so  much  valued  in  ancient  times,  could  not 
have  been  obtained  from  any  nearer  source  than 
the  coasts  of  the  German  Ocean,  &c."  See  what 
follows  for  proof. 

TYRE  AND  BRITAIN,  1200-1050  B.C. 

Story  of  Phoenicia,  Rawlinson,  p.  164. — "  But 
there  was  one  branch  of  their  sea  trade  whereto  they 
clung  with  extreme  tenacity,  and  which  at  a  date 
long  subsequent  to  the  seventh  century  they  pre 
vented  even  the  Romans  from  sharing.  This  was 
the  trade  for  tin  with  the  Scilly  Islands  and  the 
coasts  of  Cornwall  already  mentioned  in  an  earlier 
section,  which  was  one  of  the  main  sources  of  Phoe- 


CONCLUSION  293 

nician  wealth,  tin  being  found  in  a  few  places  only, 
and  being  largely  required  for  the  hardening  of 
copper  into  bronze  by  almost  all  the  races  inside  the 
Pillars  of  Hercules  with  which  the  Phoenicians  had 
dealings.  Tyre  at  the  height  of  its  greatness  sent 
her  ships  year  by  year  through  the  stormy  Atlantic 
to  the  British  Islands  to  fetch  a  commodity  which 
has  largely  flowed  back  to  the  country  of  its  birth 
as  ingredients  of  the  precious  bronzes  that  are  to 
be  seen  in  English  collections." 

PHOENICIAN  EXPANSION  IN  1050  B.C. 

Manual  of  Anct.  History,  Rawlinson,  Clarendon 
Press,  1880,  page  39. — "The  commercial  spirit  of 
the  Phoenicians  was  largely  displayed  during  this 
period,  which  till  its  close  was  one  of  absolute 
independence.  The  great  monarchies  of  Egypt 
and  Assyria  were  comparatively  speaking  weak, 
and  the  states  between  the  Euphrates  and  the 
African  border,  being  free  from  external  control, 
were  able  to  pursue  their  natural  bent  without 
interference.  Her  commercial  leanings  early  induced 
Phoenicia  to  begin  the  practice  of  establishing 
colonies,  and  the  advantages  which  the  system  was 
found  to  secure  caused  it  to  acquire  a  vast  develop 
ment.  The  coasts  and  islands  of  the  Mediterranean 
were  rapidly  covered  with  settlements,  the  Pillars 
of  Hercules  were  passed,  and  cities  built  on  the  shores 
of  the  ocean.  At  the  same  time  factories  were 
built  on  the  Persian  Gulf  and  conjointly  with  the 
Israelites  on  the  Red  Sea.  Phoenicia  had  at  this  time 
no  serious  commercial  rival,  and  the  trade  of  the 
world  was  in  her  hands/' 


294    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

GALENA 

Pliny,  vol.  vi.  3  (B.  xxxiii.  c.  xxxi.). — "  Silver 
is  never  found  but  in  shafts  sunk  in  the  ground, 
there  being  no  indications  to  raise  hopes  of  its  ex 
istence,  no  shining  sparkles  as  in  the  case  of  gold. 
The  earth  in  which  it  is  found  is  sometimes  red, 
sometimes  of  an  ashy  hue.  It  is  impossible,  too, 
to  melt  it  except  in  combination  with  lead  or  with 
Galena,  this  last  being  the  name  given  to  the  vein 
of  lead  that  is  mostly  found  running  near  the  vein 
of  silver  ore.  When  submitted,  too,  to  the  action  of 
fire  part  of  the  ore  precipitates  itself  in  the  form 
of  lead,  while  the  silver  is  left  floating  on  the  surface 
like  oil  on  water." 

Prehistoric  Times,  Sir  John  Lubbock,  Appleton 
&  Co.,  1878,  page  258. — "  The  powerful  nations 
of  Central  America  were,  however,  in  an  age  of 
bronze  while  the  N.  Americans  were  in  a  condition 
of  which  we  find  in  Europe  scant  traces,  namely, 
in  an  age  of  copper.  Silver  is  the  only  other  metal 
which  has  been  found  in  the  ancient  tumuli,  and 
that  but  in  very  small  quantities.  It  occurs  in  a 
native  form  with  the  copper  of  Lake  Superior, 
whence  in  all  probability  it  was  derived.  It  does 
not  appear  ever  to  have  been  smelted.  From  the 
large  quantities  of  Galena  which  is  found  in  the 
mounds,  Squire  and  Davis  are  disposed  to  think  that 
lead  must  have  been  used  to  a  certain  extent  by 
the  N.  American  tribes  ;  the  metal  itself,  however, 
has  not  yet  I  believe  been  found." 

Nat.  Races,  Bancroft,  vol.  iv.  778. — "  The  only 
metals  found  in  the  mounds  are  copper  and  silver, 
the  latter  only  in  small  quantities.  A  few  gold 


CONCLUSION  295 

trinkets  have  been  reported,  but  the  evidence  is 
not  conclusive  that  such  were  deposited  by  the 
mound  builders.  Iron  ore  and  Galena  occur,  but 
no  iron  or  lead." 

Nat.  Races,  vol.  iv.  779. — "  Mr.  Dickson  speaks 
confidently  of  gold,  silver,  copper,  and  Galena  money 
left  by  the  mound  builders." 

Prehistoric  Races  of  the  U.  S.,  J.  W.  Foster,  LL.D., 
Triibner  &  Co.,  Lond.  1874,  page  271. — "  Lead, 
though  easily  reduced,  does  not  appear  to  have  been 
used  to  any  considerable  extent.  Galena  is  fre 
quently  met  with  in  the  mounds  as  far  south  as  the 
Ohio  River." 

PHOENICIANS 

Story  of  Phoenicia,  Rawlinson,  p.  163. — "  The 
silver  mines  of  Southern  Spain  were  rich  in  the  ex 
treme  and  the  soil  so  abundant  with  the  product 
that  even  the  lead  was  to  a  large  extent  alloyed 
with  it,  and  the  amalgam  was  known  to  the  Greeks 
as  a  peculiar  metal  which  they  called  Galena." 

LASSOES 

Herodotus,  vii.  85. — "  There  is  a  certain  nomadic 
race  called  the  Sarmatians,  of  Persian  extraction  and 
language,  who  wear  a  dress  fashioned  between  the 
Persian  and  the  Bactrian  fashion ;  they  furnish 
8000  horse,  but  they  are  not  accustomed  to  carry 
any  arms,  either  brass  or  iron,  except  daggers  ;  they 
use  ropes  of  twisted  thongs,  trusting  to  these  they 
go  to  war.  The  mode  of  fighting  of  these  men  is 
as  follows  :  When  they  engage  with  the  enemy  they 
throw  out  the  ropes  which  have  a  noose  at  the  end, 


296    THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

and  whatever  anyone  catches,  whether  horse  or 
man,  he  drags  to  himself,  and  they  that  are  entangled 
in  the  coils  are  put  to  death.  This  is  their  mode 
of  fighting,  and  they  are  marshalled  with  the  Per 


sians/' 


History  of  Mankind,  Ratzel,  vol.  ii.  81.  "  The 
Patagonians." — "  The  weapons  of  these  nomads  are 
not  the  bow  and  arrow  which  elsewhere  are  in  use 
among  rude  pastoral  races  but  the  javelin,  the 
bolas,  and  the  lasso,  from  which  the  bolas  seems  to 
have  arisen/' 

International  Encyclopedia,  vol.  xi.  10.  "  Lasso/' 
— "  A  rope  of  hair,  hemp,  or  hide  from  sixty  to  one 
hundred  feet  long  with  a  running  noose  at  one  end. 
It  is  thrown  mostly  from  horseback  with  a  whirl 
which  takes  the  expanded  noose  over  the  horns  or 
legs  of  the  animal  to  be  captured,  a  snatch  tightens 
it  and  disables  the  quarry.  It  was  in  Mexico 
and  South  America  before  their  discovery  by  the 
Spaniards,  and  is  still  used  for  catching  wild  cattle. 
It  is  a  favourite  hunting  equipment  of  the  cowboys 
of  North- Western  Texas  and  Mexico/' 

Nat.  Races,  Pacific  States,  vol.  i.  493. — "  Through 
out  Arizona  and  New  Mexico  the  bow  and  arrow  is 
the  principal  weapon  both  in  war  and  in  the  chase, 
to  which  are  added  by  those  accustomed  to  move  on 
horseback  the  shield  and  lance,  with  such  also  the 
Mexican  riata  or  lasso  may  occasionally  be  seen." 

Note  58. — "  The  weapons  of  war  were  the  spear 
or  lance,  the  bow,  and  the  lasso." 

Nat.  Races,  vol.  i.  724.  "  The  Mosquitos." — "  Be 
side  the  implements  already  referred  to  under  fishing 
and  weapons  may  be  mentioned  the  lasso,  in  the 
use  of  which  they  are  very  expert." 


CONCLUSION  297 

TRADE  WINDS 

Nelson's  Ency.,  vol.  xii.  147. — "  So  called  from 
their  steady  course,  are  met  with  between  the 
latitudes  of  7°  to  29°  north,  and  3°  to  20°  south. 
North  of  the  equator  these  winds  blow  almost  con 
stantly  from  the  north-east,  while  south  of  the 
equator  the  prevailing  direction  is  south-east.  The 
distribution  of  barometric  pressure  which  brings 
about  the  permanency  of  the  trade  winds  is  a  belt 
of  comparatively  high  pressure  from  30°°  to  30'° 
inches,  which  circles  the  globe  at  the  tropics  both 
north  and  south  of  the  equator,  causing  the  north 
east  trades  of  the  tropic  of  Cancer  and  the  south 
east  trades  of  the  tropic  of  Capricorn/' 

Note,  T.  C.  J. — Beyond  these  are  the  periodic 
and  variable  winds,  consequently  the  real  perplexi 
ties  of  navigation  begin  approximately  at  from 
20°  to  30°  north  and  south  of  the  equatorial  line. 

Ency.  Brit.,  vol.  xvi.  144. — "  North  and  south 
trade  winds  also  prevail  in  the  Pacific  Ocean  separ 
ated  by  a  region  of  calms,  which  would  appear, 
however,  to  be  less  clearly  defined  than  in  the 
region  of  calms  in  the  Atlantic/' 

CHITTIM 

Hist,  of  Phoenician  Art,  Perrot  and  Chipiez,  vol. 
ii.  92. — "  This  was  the  oldest  and  most  important 
of  all  the  Phoenician  settlements  on  the  island  of 
Cyprus,  and  carried  on  the  liveliest  trade  with  the 
continent  and  the  interior  of  the  island,  and  we  find 
that  the  Hebrew  prophets  applied  it  indiscriminately 
to  the  whole  of  the  western  world,  which  they  looked 
upon  as  a  dependency  of  Phoenicia/' 


298     THE    PHOENICIANS    AND    AMERICA 

BETYLLIUM 

Story  of  Phoenician  Art,  Perrot  and  Chipiez,  vol. 
i.  58. — "  The  worship  of  Betylae,  which  we  encounter 
in  every  country,  reached  by  Phoenician  influence, 
may  be  traced  to  the  same  source.  The  word  we 
have  used  comes  to  us  from  the  Greek,  and  they 
took  it  with  some  slight  alteration  from  the  Semitic 
group  Beth-el,  which  means  the  house  of  God.  This 
was  a  generic  term  used  to  denote  all  sacred  stones, 
that  is  to  say  all  stones  credited  with  the  possession 
of  any  special  and  peculiar  virtue.  We  are  told 
that  some  were  aerolites,  a  circumstance  which 
greatly  enhance  their  credit. " 

HUMAN  SACRIFICES 

Hist,  of  Phoenician  Art,  Perrot  and  Chipiez,  vol. 
i.  76.  Note  i. — Philo  of  Byblius  speaks  of  human 
sacrifices  as  a  rite  peculiar  to  the  Phoenician  race 
(Frg.  Hist.  Greece,  vol.  iii.  570). 

FIJI  :  ORIGIN  OF  NAME 

Ain-Fiji  is  the  name  of  a  large  gushing  spring 
which  supplies  water  to  the  Abana,  one  of  the  rivers 
of  Damascus.  These  Fiji  Islands  in  the  Pacific  are 
noted  for  their  large  gushing  streams.  These  simi 
larities  in  name,  &c.,  have  been  referred  to  by  Mr. 
John  Macgregor  in  his  book  The  Rob  Roy  on  the 
Jordan,  and  the  point  has  also  been  discussed  by 
Sir  Arthur  Gordon,  Sir  W.  Des  Voeux,  Governor 
of  Fiji. 


Printed  by  BALLANTYNE,  HANSON  6*  Co. 
at  Paul's  Work,  Edinburgh 


RETURN     CIRCULATION  DEPARTMENT 

TO— +•      202  Main  Library 


LOAN  PERIOD  1      2                               3 
HOME  USE 

456 

ALL  BOOKS  MAY  BE  RECALLED  AFTER  7  DAYS 

RENEWALS  AND  RECHAFlC-.tr,  WAY  BE  MADc  4  DAYS  P*«O«  TO  OUR  BATE. 
LOAN  PERIODS  AHE  1-MONTH,  3-MONTMS,  AND  1-YEAR. 

RENEWALS:  CALL  (415)  S42-J4C5 

DUE  AS  STAMPED  BELOW 

•JAN  1  R  loon             04  1993 

CiRPI  II  ATirMLi                    r^r^^T     W' 

t\9'-2 

\s  in  v^  u  Lf\  If  U  N          i  rr  ^  H^M  •  u>^ 

j\\j  LvJ  UWV 

FPlt  Mfl?  i«« 

11  ""*  '^      ~^       r- 

JHN  U  i^^                      CiRC   A 

jG  29  '93 

von  11  AT«ON      JAN  2  4  1995 

;ipmTr  

f'AQ  fl    X  m/l?        "                         1 

wMiVj  Uf  ^nuifii  ptattK* 

^)  n  ^ 

ETuu  ^  v  - 

UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA,  BERKELEY 
FORM  NO.  DD6,  60m,  1/83          BERKELEY,  CA  94720 


U.C.  BERKELEY  LIBRARIES