Skip to main content

Full text of "The discovery and early history of New Jersey; a paper read befores the Passaic County historical society"

See other formats


^^4^    G(hnn^..f-^^^^  ^  ^^     <itt^s::?^?fc<,^ 


P    137 
.N42 
Copy    1 


SP3?e 


Discovery  and  Early  History 


^ 


New  Jersey 


£>>  WILUAM  NELSON 


I  he  Discovery  and  Early  riistory 

of 

New  Jersey 


A  Paper  Read  before  the  Passaic  Count})  Historical 
Societ}),  June  //,  1872. 

By  William  Nelson. 


fl^l 


fi 


^^ 


One  Hundred  Copies  Printed,  A.  D.  1912. 


[The  original  manuscript  having  turned  up  accidentally  in  the  sum- 
mer of  1912,  this  address  has  now  been  printed  precisely  as  written 
forty  years  ago,  without  revision,  correction  or  addition,  except  two 
or  three  foot-notes,  enclosed  in  brackets.] 


C^m 


!i)2; 


CG 


THE  DISCOVERY  AND  EARLY  HISTORY 
OF  NEW  JERSEY 


INTRODUCTORY. 

In  this  age  of  "p^'ogi'^ss," — of  the  steam-engine,  the 
hghtning  printing-press,  the  locomotive,  the  ocean  tele- 
graph-cable, and  universal  hurry  and  bustle;  in  these  days 
of  new  inventions,  of  labor-reform,  social-reform,  and 
world-and-mankind-reform  generally — it  is  well  for  us  to 
pause  once  in  a  while,  step  aside  out  of  the  on-rushing 
tide  of  human  "p^'og^'^ss,"  calmly  to  observe  where  we 
stand  and  whither  we  are  drifting,  and  then  look  back  to 
see  whence  we  came.  Thus  we  can  judge  as  to  the  actual 
progress  we  are  making,  if  any ;  and  if  we  use  our  faculties 
aright  we  can  see  many  errors  committed  in  the  past  to  be 
avoided  in  the  future.  And,  thus  contemplating  the  situa- 
tion, it  will  be  strange  if  there  do  not  involuntarily  arise 
the  exclamation,  Cm  bono?  For  what  good  have  we 
been  toiling,  pushing,  crowding  forward  in  such  tumultu- 
ous haste?  The  actual  progress  of  mankind  is  infinitely 
slow;  it  takes  almost  as  long  to  pass  from  the  "age  of 
stone"  to  the  "age  of  iron"  as  it  would  for  a  well-behaved 
monkey  to  develop  into  some  kinds  of  men  we  know.  So 
we  might  as  well  move  more  deliberately,  not  consuming 
with  the  fires  of  impatience,  but  restraining  our  impetuosity 
and  saving  our  strength  for  use  when  and  where  most 
needed,  only  doing  our  appointed  tasks  well,  satisfied  to 
leave  the  issue  to  Him  who  hath  foreseen  all  things  to  the 
end  of  time,  and  to  whom  "a  thousand  years  are  but  as 
yesterday  when  it  is  past." 


To  one  who  thus  withdraws  himself,  in  spirit,  from  the 
concerns  of  the  present,  and  gazes  backward,  how  much 
is  there  calculated  to  inspire  him  with  feelings  of  admira- 
tion, of  emulation,  and  of  humility!  He  sees  that  there 
have  been  men  as  wise,  as  noble,  as  true,  as  good,  as 
generous,  as  any  now  living ;  that  there  is  really  very  little 
in  theology,  sociology  or  politics  that  has  not  been  dis- 
cussed by  men  whose  grandchildren  have  long  ago  turned 
to  ashes;  that  the  blatant  "reformers,"  so  self-styled,  who 
arrogate  to  themselves  the  credit  for  discovering  new  ideas 
of  one  kind  or  another,  are  indeed  but  poor  imitators  of 
abler  men  and  women  whose  names  and  systems  were 
long  since  forgotten  by  a  practical  world  that  in  the  end 
preserves  only  the  kernels  of  grain  thrown  into  its  vast 
thought-hopper;  that  we,  who  so  exult  in  our  superiority 
over  those  who  are  gone,  are  but  fulfilling  the  destiny 
marked  out  for  us  a  century  ago,  and,  considering  our 
greater  advantages,  are  not  doing  so  much  better  than  our 
grandfathers,  if  so  well.  The  study  of  the  past  inspires 
one  with  reverence,  often,  for  the  foresight  of  our  prede- 
cessors, as  we  contemplate  their  sacrifices  for  the  sake  of 
principles  essential  to  human  progress  and  happiness. 

No  higher  heroism  nor  nobler  manhood  is  anywhere 
exhibited  in  American  history  than  may  be  found  in  the 
annals  of  our  own  New  Jersey,  and  it  therefore  seems  all 
the  stranger  that  our  early  history  has  not  been  more  gen- 
erally studied.  TTie  paper  herewith  submitted  is  a  rough 
sketch  of  the  leading  events  connected  with  the  discovery, 
settlement  and  early  government  of  our  State,  prepared 
in  the  hope  that  an  interest  in  the  subject  may  be  excited 
not  only  among  our  people  generally,  but  especially 
among  those  who,  studiously  inclined,  have  never  deemed 
it  worthy  of  investigation,  only  because  its  real  importance 
and  attractiveness  have  never  been  brought  to  their  atten- 


tion.  Though  hastily  prepared,  the  statements  contained 
in  this  paper  are  made  only  on  the  best  authority,  and  may 
be  relied  upon  as  correct.  The  authorities  are  cited  for 
every  statement  of  importance,  for  verification  by  the 
critical  reader,  and  as  a  guide  to  the  young  student  to  the 
more  available  and  useful  works  on  the  subject. 

THE  DISCOVERY  OF  NEW  JERSEY. 

This  part  of  our  history,  or  rather  introduction  to  our 
history,  has  been  but  scantily  touched  upon  by  writers  on 
New  Jersey,  and  is  doubtless  familiar  to  but  few,  which 
may  be  considered  excuse  enough  for  dwelling  upon  it 
here  at  some  length.  Our  information  is  mainly  gathered 
from  a  valuable  volume  of  "Collections,"  published  by  the 
New  York  Historical  Society  in  1841,  being  Vol.  I, 
New  Series,  of  the  Society's  "Collections."  This  volume 
contains  accounts  written  by  some  of  the  very  earliest 
visitors  to  the  American  continent,  from  whom  we  shall 
quote  freely. 

Skipping  over  the  traditional  accounts  of  the  discovery 
of  the  Western  Hemisphere  by  the  Northmen  in  the  ninth 
or  tenth  century,  or  by  the  Welshmen  in  the  twelfth 
century  (vide  Gentleman  s  Mag.,  March,  1  740,  quoted 
in  American  Hist  Record,  June,  1872),  let  us  remind 
you  that  while  Christopher  Columbus  is  credited  with  the 
discovery — or  re-discovery — of  the  new  world  in  1492, 
the  Western  Continent  was  first  discovered  in  1497,  by 
Sebastian  Cabot,  who  was  sent  out  by  Henry  VIII,  of 
England,  whence  the  English  claim  to  supremacy  here  a 
century  and  a  half  later.  In  1 498  Cabot  coasted  what  is 
now  the  New  Jersey  shore.  At  that  time  no  fashionable 
villas  were  "on  the  beach  at  Long  Branch" ;  no  lighthouse 
at  Cape  May  warned  the  mariner  of  danger;  no  fishing- 
smacks  were  to  be  seen  in  the  numerous  inlets  along  the 


coast.  The  land  was  covered  with  primeval  forests 
through  whose  dusky  glades  strange  forms  glided.  The 
whole  country  was  novel  and  mysterious  in  the  eyes  of 
Cabot's  crew,  and  we  do  not  wonder  that  in  such  a 
superstitious  age  the  people  to  whom,  on  their  return,  they 
told  of  this  wonderful  land,  were  loth  to  settle  in  such  a 
mystic  and  uncanny  country.  So  we  have  no  record  that 
Cabot  or  his  men  ever  even  set  foot  on  the  virgin  earth  of 
New  Jersey. 

Capt.  John  de  Verazzano,  a  Florentine,  has  given  us 
an  account  of  a  voyage  he  made  along  the  North  Ameri- 
can coast  in  1524,  in  a  letter  to  "His  Most  Serene 
Majesty,"  Francis  I,  King  of  France,  under  whose  orders 
he  sailed  in  the  good  ship  "Dolphin."  In  March,  1524, 
he  coasted  New  Jersey — then,  of  course,  unnamed — and 
he  tells  how  one  of  his  sailors,  in  trying  to  approach  the 
shore  to  throw  some  trinkets  to  the  wondering  natives,  was 
so  buffeted  about  by  the  waves  as  to  be  prostrated,  and 
Kow  the  Indians  carried  him  ashore  and  restored  him  to 
consciousness,  treated  him  with  the  greatest  kindness,  and 
then  let  him  depart.  Further  on,  Verazzano  went  ashore 
with  twenty  men,  and  captured  a  small  boy  to  carry  back 
to  France,  much  as  he  would  a  dog  or  any  other  animal. 
"A  young  girl  of  about  eighteen  or  twenty,  who  was  very 
beautiful  and  very  tall,"  only  escaped  captivity  because 
she  shrieked  loudly  as  the  sailors  attempted  to  lead  her 
away,  and  they  had  to  pass  some  woods  and  were  far 
from  the  ship.  Thus  the  very  first  visit  of  the  whites  gave 
the  Indians  just  cause  to  fear  and  hate  them  forever  after. 

Verazzano  greatly  admired  the  country,  which  he  says 
"appeared  very  beautiful  and  full  of  the  largest  forests." 
He  "found  also  wild  roses,  violets,  lilies,  and  many  sorts 
of  plants  and  fragrant  flowers  different  from  our  own," 
which  here  for  many  a  century  had  sprung  up,  blossomed, 


bloomed  and  "wasted  their  sweetness  on  the  desert  air," 
or  perchance  had  from  time  to  time  afforded  to  Indian 
youth  the  means  of  indicating  to  some  fair  dusky  maiden 
his  modest  attachment.  Verazzano  was  so  pleased  with 
this  neighborhood  that  he  remained  three  days,  and  next 
entered,  beyond  doubt.  New  York  harbor,  with  a  boat. 
He  "found  the  country  on  its  banks  well  peopled,  the 
inhabitants  not  differing  much  from  the  others,  being 
dressed  out  with  the  feathers  of  birds  of  various  colors. 
They  came  towards  us  with  evident  delight,  raising  loud 
shouts  of  admiration,  and  showing  us  where  we  could 
most  securely  land  with  our  boat."  However,  he  was 
driven  back  by  adverse  winds.  (A^,  Y.  Hist.  Soc.  Col- 
lections, 2d  Series,  Vol.  I,  pp.  41-46.)  He  sailed  next 
along  Long  Island,  etc.,  but  does  not  tell  us  what  he  did 
with  his  young  captive. 

We  might  imagine  the  emotions  of  awe  and  wonder- 
ment that  filled  the  breasts  of  the  untutored  natives  of  the 
new  world  when  first  they  beheld  their  strange  visitors, 
but  we  have  an  account  that  bears  internal  evidences  of 
genuineness,  handed  down  by  tradition  among  the  Indians 
from  generation  to  generation,  and  obtained  more  than  a 
century  ago  from  the  lips  of  ancient  Delawares,  by  the 
Rev.  John  Heckewelder,  for  many  years  a  Moravian 
missionary  to  the  Indians  in  Pennsylvania.  It  may  be 
found  in  the  volume  cited  above,  pp.  71-74.  It  probably 
refers  to  the  subsequent  arrival  of  Hudson,  as  the  In- 
dians of  his  day  had  no  recollection,  or  even  tradition, 
it  appears,  of  an  earlier  landing  of  whites,  but  the  account 
may  not  be  inappropriate  here.  We  are  told,  then,  that 
the  Indians  watched  the  strange  object  approaching  their 
shore  with  feelings  of  mingled  alarm,  awe  and  wonder, 
finally  concluding  the  ship  to  be  "a  large  canoe  or  house, 
in  which  the  great  Mannitto  (or  Supreme  Being)  himself 


8 

was,  and  that  he  probably  was  coming  to  visit  them." 
The  chiefs  hastily  resolved  themselves  into  a  "committee 
of  the  whole,"  to  arrange  a  suitable  "reception";  the 
women  were  required  to  prepare  the  best  of  victuals ;  idols 
and  images  were  examined  and  put  in  order ;  and  a  grand 
dance  was  also  added  to  this  extraordinary  entertain- 
ment, on  this  most  extraordinary  occasion.  "The  con- 
jurors were  also  set  to  work,  to  determine  what  the 
meaning  of  this  phenomenon  was,  and  what  the  result 
would  be.  Both  to  these,  and  to  the  chiefs  and  wise  men 
of  the  nation,  men,  women  and  children  were  looking  up 
for  advice  and  protection.  Between  hope  and  fear,  and 
in  confusion,  a  dance  commenced.  While  in  this  situa- 
tion fresh  runners  arrive,  declaring  it  a  house  of  various 
colors,  and  crowded  with  living  creatures.  *  *  Other 
runners  soon  after  arriving,  declare  it  a  large  house  of 
various  colors,  full  of  people,  yet  of  quite  a  different  color 
than  they  (the  Indians)  are  of;  that  they  were  also 
dressed  in  a  different  manner  from  them,  and  that  one  in 
particular  appeared  altogether  red,  which  must  be  the 
great  Mannitto  himself."  The  whites  land,  treat  the 
Indians  to  liquor,  who  of  course  get  drunk,  and  the  whites 
leave  after  the  friendliest  interchange  of  mutual  regards. 

More  than  three-quarters  of  a  century  seem  now  to 
have  elapsed  ere  this  country  was  again  visited  by  the 
whites,  Europe  being  convulsed  with  the  great  throes  of 
the  Reformation,  and  the  accompanying  wars  that  kept 
her  adventurous  spirits  busily  employed  at  home.  Still, 
Spain  was  prosecuting  the  conquest  of  Mexico  and  Peru, 
and  occasional  adventurous  sailors  of  other  countries 
preferred  to  prowl  over  the  seas  in  quest  of  Spanish 
frigates  laden  with  the  yellow  gold  robbed  from  the 
natives  of  the  new  world.  This  was  a  speedier  way  to 
fame  and  fortune,  and  vastly  more  romantic,  than  to  settle 


in  the  unknown  wilderness,  thousands  of  miles  away  from 
home,  and  there  patiently  delve  and  plant,  to  establish  a 
home.  Canada,  indeed,  was  settled  as  early  as  1 535  by 
the  French,  who  called  their  happy  new  home  Acadia, 
and  there  lived  the  sweet,  simple  lives  so  charmingly 
painted  by  Longfellow,  in  "Evangeline."  The  Span- 
iards, too,  laid  claim  to  nearly  the  whole  continent,  or  at 
least  the  Atlantic  coast,  possibly  because  one  Gomez,  a 
Spaniard,  had  about  1  525  sailed  under  their  flag  along 
the  coast,  and  in  1535  we  find  a  Spanish  grant  for 
Florida  (settled  in  1512),  in  which  its  boundaries  are 
described  as  extending  from  Newfoundland  to  the  22d 
deg.  N.  Lat.,  or  south  of  Cuba.  Even  a  century  later 
the  Spaniards  claimed  all  this  country,  and  made  incur- 
sions along  the  Virginia  coast,  and  colonists  to  the  New 
Netherlands  were  warned  that  it  was  "first  of  all  necessary 
that  they  be  placed  in  a  good  defensive  position  and  well 
provided  with  arms  and  a  fort,  as  the  Spaniards  *  * 
would  never  allow  anyone  to  gain  a  possession  there.  ' 
(Doc.  Hist  N.  y..  Vol  3,  p.  34.) 

Massachusetts  was  discovered  in  1600,  and  in  1603- 
1632  Champlain  thoroughly  explored  "New  France," 
and  skirted  the  New  Jersey  and  Virginia  coast,  but  his 
map  of  the  country  (prefixed  to  the  volume  just  quoted) 
gives  no  idea  of  the  shape  of  New  Jersey,  though  he 
possibly  refers  to  this  neighborhood  when  he  speaks  of 
"the  coast  of  a  very  fine  country  inhabited  by  savages  who 
cultivate  it."     (Ut  supra,  p.  21.) 

The  English  now  assumed  the  ownership  of  the  new 
world,  by  virtue  of  Sebastian  Cabot's  long-forgotten  dis- 
covery, and  in  1606  James  I,  of  England,  gave  charters 
for  the  territory  between  the  34th  and  46th  degs.  N.  Lat., 
or  say  from  Cape  Fear,  North  Carolina,  to  Newfound- 
land, the  southern  half  to  the  London,  and  the  rest  to  the 


lO 


Plymouth  Company.      (Cordons  N.  J.,  p.  5;  Humes 
England,  Vol  IV,  Am.  ed.,  p.  519.) 

But  the  Dutch,  proverbially  slow  though  they  be,  were 
ahead  of  the  "Plymouth  Company,"  and  in  1609  the 
Netherlands  East  India  Company  sent  out  Henry  Hud- 
son, a  bold  English  sea-captain,  to  renew  for  the  second 
or  third  time  a  search  for  a  northwest  passage  to  China 
and  the  East  Indies — a  search  that  had  been  unsuccess- 
fully made  a  score  of  times  before,  as  it  has  been  since. 
[In  1595  one  John  Davis  published  in  London  "The 
World's  hydrographical  Description,  whereby  it  appears 
that  there  is  a  short  and  speedie  Passage  into  the  South 
Seas,  to  China,  &c.,  by  northerly  Navigation."  Lowndes, 
Bohn's  ed.,  p.  602.]  Many  of  the  directors  of  the  com- 
pany opposed  this  expedition.  "It  was,"  said  they, 
"throwing  money  away,  and  nothing  else."  However, 
Hudson  was  sent  out  April  6,  1 609,  with  a  mere  yacht, 
called  the  Halve-Maan,  or  "Half-Moon" — earlier  pro- 
phetically called  the  Cood  Hope — manned  by  a  crew  of 
sixteen  Englishmen  and  Hollanders.  He  sailed  north- 
wardly, touched  Newfoundland,  discovered  Cape  Cod 
and  called  that  country  "New  Holland,"  as  the  French 
had  previously  called  the  country  north  of  that,  "New 
France,"  and  as  it  was  designated  till  the  English  con- 
quest in  the  middle  of  the  lait  century.  (Lambrechisen, 
N.  Y.  Hist  Soc.  Coll,  N.  S.,  Vol.  I,  p.  85.) 

On  Thursday  afternoon,  September  3,  1609,  the 
natives  about  Sandy  Hook  saw  a  vessel  approach  from 
the  limitless  sea.  It  was  the  "Half-Moon,"  commanded 
by  Hudson.  With  wonder,  admiration  and  awe  they 
gazed  on  the  strange  sight,  but  after  their  first  astonish- 
ment wore  off,  these  aboriginal  Jerseymen  went  on  board 
the  vessel  without  hesitation,  and  seemed  to  be  pleased. 
They  were  civil,  and  gladly  exchanged  skins,  tobacco. 


II 


hemp,  grapes,  etc.,  for  knives,  beads,  articles  of  clothing, 
etc.,  betraying  a  disposition  to  get  the  best  of  a  bargain — 
a  predilection  that  is  popularly  supposed  to  characterize 
the  present  race  of  Jerseymen  as  well.     (Journal  of  JueU 
Hudson's  Mate,  ut  supra,  p.  323.)     Hudson  penetrated 
the  Narrows  September  1  1  th,  and  spent  three  weeks  ex- 
ploring the  noble  river  whose  name  now  perpetuates  his 
fame  (though  it  was  first  called  the  Manahaita,  the  North 
river,  the  Rio  de  la  Montagne,  the  Great  river,  and  the 
Great  North  river) ,  sending  a  boat  up  as  far  as  Albany, 
and  perhaps  above.     He  made  no  settlements,  of  course. 
With  a  crew  of  but  sixteen  men  that  would  have  been 
scarcely  practicable.     But  he  doubtless  raised  the  Dutch 
flag  and  claimed  the  ownership  of  the  country,  by  right  of 
discovery,  for  his  masters  and  the  Dutch  Government. 
He  found  the  Indians  changeable  in  disposition — some- 
times   friendly,    and    then    on    the    slightest   provocation 
hostile.     Possibly  they  still  remembered  the  previous  visit 
of  the  whites — when  one  of  their  families  was  ruthlessly 
robbed  of  a  darling  son,  and  were  on  the  alert  for  a  similar 
attempt  by  Hudson's  men.     One  of  his  men — John  Cole- 
man— was  shot  in  the  throat  with  an  Indian  arrow,  and  in 
one  or  two  encounters  Hudson's  little  crew  killed  ten  of 
the  enemy.     At  various  places  he  found  many  friendly 
Indians,    who   welcomed   him   cordially   when   he   went 
ashore,  though  he  says  they  had  "a  great  propensity  to 
steal,    and   were    exceedingly    adroit   in   carrying    away 
whatever  they  took  a  fancy  to."    They  got  up  an  enter- 
tainment for  him,  regardless  of  expense,  serving  up  "some 
food  in  well  made  red  wooden  bowls,"  shot  a  couple  of 
pigeons,  and  even  "killed  a  fat  dog,  and  skinned  it  in 
great  haste  with  shells  which  they  had  got  out  of  the 
water."      (Hudson  s  Journal,  quoted  by  De  Laet,  and 
Juet's  Log  of  Hudson's  Voyage,  ut  supra,  pp.  289,  290, 


12 

300,  321-4.)  Hudson  returned  with  glowing  accounts 
of  the  wonderful  new  country,  and  the  Company  sent  out 
settlers  and  trading  vessels  in  the  next  few  years.  The 
unfortunate  Hudson  came  to  a  terrible  end  the  year  after 
his  return  to  Holland.  He  was  sent  out  once  more  to 
find  that  mysterious  Northwest  Passage,  and  discovered 
the  Straits  and  Bay  that  bear  his  name,  when  in  that 
desolate,  ice-bound  region  his  crew  mutinied  and  sent  him, 
his  son  and  six  faithful  men,  adrift  in  a  small  boat  on  the 
dreary  ocean,  and  they  were  never  heard  of  more.  But 
his  work  was  done.  If  he  had  not,  indeed,  discovered  a 
new  route  to  the  Indies,  he  had  discovered  a  country  of 
far  more  importance  to  the  world  than  the  Indies  have 
been  or  ever  will  be,  and  he  had  discovered  a  harbor  that 
will  one  day  receive  the  bulk  of  the  products  of  the  Indies, 
though  he  never  dreamed  that  his  name  would  yet  be 
perpetuated  in  the  title  of  a  great  and  wealthy  country, 
within  whose  limits  tens  of  thousands  of  miles  of  iron 
roads  would  yet  terminate,  depositing  in  unbroken  bulk 
the  teas  and  the  silks  of  the  Far  East,  from  away  across 
the  Western  Continent. 

FIRST  SETTLEMENTS. 

The  first  permanent  lodgment  on  the  shores  of  Nexv 
Netherland  seems  to  have  been  made  in  1613,  when  a 
trading  station  was  established  on  the  present  site  of  New 
York.  In  1614  and  1615  forts  appear  to  have  been 
built  by  the  Dutch  at  Albany  and  at  New  York,  and  in 
1614  one  was  erected,  it  would  seem,  at  what  is  now 
Jersey  City — authority  therefor  having  been  obtained 
from  their  High  Mightinesses  of  the  United  Netherlands. 
(Lambrechtsen  and  De  Laet,  ut  supra,  pp.  88,  291 ,  299, 
305;  Cordons  N.  /.,  p.  6.)  Now  settlers  gradually 
strayed  over  to  the  unknown  wilderness  of  the  new  world. 


13 

We  may  well  believe  that  few  men  cared  to  take  their 
families  to  this  mysterious  land,  where  "immeasurable 
woods  with  swamps  covered  the  soil,"  and  "savages  lived 
in  their  coverts,  clothing  themselves  with  the  skins  of  wild 
beasts,"  their  heads  covered  with  feathers, — a  costume 
that  must  have  given  them  a  wild  aspect,  soon  heightened 
in  the  imagination  of  the  whites  when  a  band  of  these 
savages  would  occasionally  sally  out  and  murder  some 
settler.  Despite  the  glowing  accounts  brought  home  by 
some  travelers,  the  old-world  people  were  loth  to  leave 
their  settled  habitations  for  the  western  hemisphere,  even 
though  New  Jersey  already  boasted  an  astonishing  attrac- 
tion in  "the  retired  paradise  of  the  children  of  the 
Ethiopian  Emperor ;  a  wonder,  for  it  is  a  square  rock  two 
miles  compass,  1  50  feet  high,  and  a  wall-like  precipice,  a 
strait  entrance,  easily  made  invincible,  where  he  keeps 
200  for  his  guards,  and  under  is  a  flat  valley,  all  plain  to 
plant  and  sow."  (Plantagenet's  Description  of  NeTX> 
Albion,  quoted  in  Whitehead's  East  Jerse"^,  p.  24.) 
Apart  from  the  uncertainty  of  settling  in  a  new  country, 
where  the  success  of  the  crops  would  be  dubious  for  years, 
the  voyage  across  the  ocean  was  a  vastly  different  matter 
from  what  it  is  now.  Instead  of  steamers  of  3,500  or 
4,000  tons  burthen,  whose  size  prevents  rolling  in  a  great 
measure,  making  the  passage  in  seven  to  ten  days,  by  the 
most  direct  route:  in  those  days  ships  or  yachts  of  50  to 
200  tons  burthen  were  most  common,  and  though  as  early 
as  1603  Gosnold  had  found  a  straight  course  across  the 
ocean,  yet  for  many  years  afterward  mariners  took  the  old 
route,  "first  directing  their  course  southwards  to  the 
tropic,  sailing  westward  by  means  of  trade  winds,  and 
then  turning  northward,  till  they  reached  the  English 
settlements."  (Hume's  Hist.  England,  Am.  ed..  Vol. 
4,  p.  519.)     Or,  as  another  writer,  in  1624,  says:    "This 


14 

country  now  called  New  Netherland  is  usually  reached  in 
seven  or  eight  weeks  from  here.  The  course  lies  towards 
the  Canary  Islands;  thence  to  the  (West)  Indian  Islands, 
then  towards  the  main  land  of  Virginia,  steering  right 
across,  leaving  in  fourteen  days  the  Bahamas  on  the  left, 
and  the  Bermudas  on  the  right  hand  where  the  winds  are 
variable  with  which  the  land  is  made."  {Wassenae/s 
Historic  van  Europa,  quoted  in  Doc.  Hist.  N.  Y.,  Vol. 
3,  p.  28.)  Hence  we  may  be  prepared  to  find  that  so  late 
as  1 638  vessels  seldom  arrived  at  the  New  Netherlands  in 
winter,  and  when  De  Vries  anchored  opposite  Fort 
Amsterdam,  December  27th,  1638,  he  and  his  fellow- 
passengers  "were  received  with  much  joy,  as  they  did  not 
expect  to  see  a  vessel  at  that  time  of  the  year."  (De 
Vries,  in  A^.  Y.  Hist.  Soc.  Coll.,  N.  S.,  Vol.  I,  p.  260.) 

Still,  there  are  always  adventurous  men,  and  men  to 
whom  freedom  and  independence  present  a  charm  that 
will  lead  them  to  brave  any  and  all  danger — even  the 
perils  of  a  voyage  over  trackless  oceans  (for  there  was  no 
Maury  two  and  a  half  centuries  ago,  to  map  out  paths 
over  the  "vasty  deep,"  and  the  very  winds),  in  rocking 
vessels,  and  the  dangers  of  constant  encounters  with  a 
savage  and  remorseless  foe.  And  so  we  find  ship-loads 
of  colonists  coming  over  from  time  to  time,  undeterred 
even  by  the  massacres  of  entire  settlements — as  at  Staten 
Island,  in  1641,  and  at  other  places  earlier. 

Accordingly,  we  find  settlements  at  Bergen  as  early  as 
1618;  but  that  place  must  have  increased  but  slowly,  for 
it  was  not  till  1661  that  the  village  was  large  enough  to 
be  allowed  a  court  arid  a  Sheriff,  the  court  being  com- 
posed of  the  Sheriff  and  two  Schepins  (magistrates),  and 
not  till  1662  that  a  church  was  started,  $162  being  raised 
to  erect  a  log  house,  replaced  by  one  of  stone  in  1680. 
{Alban})  Records,  quoted  in  Whitehead's  E.  J.,  p.  16.) 


15 

Had  there  been  250  families  (say  1,000  souls)  in  the 
settlement  (which  then  covered  all  of  the  present  Hudson 
county  and  part  of  Bergen  county),  it  would  have  been 
entitled  to  a  city  government  composed  of  an  upper 
branch  of  three  Burgomasters  and  five  or  seven  Schepins, 
and  a  lower  branch  of  twenty  Councilmen.      (Van  der 

Donck,  N.  Y.  Hist.  Soc.  ColL  N.  S.,  Vol  3,  p.  240.) 

In  1661  a  ferry  from  Bergen  to  New  Amsterdam  was 
established,  and  the  undertaking  seemed  so  risky  that  a 
monopoly  had  to  be  guaranteed,  to  induce  anyone  to 
operate  it.  In  the  year  following  we  find  that  the  solitary 
"ferryman  complained  that  the  authorities  of  Bergen  had 
authorized  the  inhabitants  to  'ferry  themselves  over  when 
they  pleased,'  to  the  great  detriment  of  his  monopoly." 
{Albany)  Records,  quoted  in  Whitehead's  E.  /.,  p.  20.) 
Though  the  church  building  was  begun  as  early  as  1 662, 
as  mentioned  above,  it  was  not  till  ninety-five  years  later, 
or  1757,  that  it  had  a  settled  pastor.  (Rome^ns  \st 
Ref.  Ch.  of  Hacf^ensac^,  p.  40. )  Even  our  old  Totowa 
church  was  more  enterprising  than  that,  for  it  had  a  settled 
pastor  in  1  756. 

It  has  been  frequently  asserted  that  the  Puritans  who 
sailed  from  Holland  in  1 620  intended  to  colonize  in  the 
New  Netherlands,  but  that  adverse  winds,  or  the 
treachery  of  the  ship's  captain,  caused  them  to  land  much 
further  north,  at  Plymouth  Rock,  instead  of  at  New 
York,  or  in  New  Jersey.  (Cordon  s  N.  J.,  p.  7;  Robert- 
son s  America,  quoted  by  Lambrechtsen,  ut  supra,  p.  98.) 

In  1628  there  were  on  Manhattan  Island  only  270 
souls,  living  there  in  peace  with  the  natives.  (Was- 
senaers  Historic  van  Europa,  N.  Y.  Doc.  Hist.,  Vol.  3, 
p.  48.)  But  as  the  land  was  undeveloped,  in  1629  the 
Dutch  West  India  Company,  anxious  to  encourage 
emigration  to  the  new  world,  which  had  come  into  the 


i6 

possession  of  that  Company  (from  the  Netherlands  East 
India  Company),  issued  a  prospectus  in  which  rights  and 
privileges  were  guaranteed  to  the  immigrant,  quite  unusual 
at  that  early  date.  Any  who  undertook  to  plant  a  colony 
of  fifty  families  in  four  years  were  to  be  acknowledged 
"patroons"  of  New  Netherland,  and  allowed  to  occupy 
twelve  English  miles  along  the  North  river  shore,  or  six 
miles  each  side,  and  indefinitely  into  the  interior,  to  "for- 
ever possess  and  enjoy  all  the  lands  lying  within  the 
aforesaid  limits,  together  with  the  chief  command," 
privileges,  franchises,  appurtenances,  etc.,  "to  be  holden 
from  the  company  as  an  eternal  heritage."  This  was 
absolute  sovereignty,  though  an  appeal  was  guaranteed 
the  colonists  in  certain  cases  from  the  courts  of  the 
patroons.  The  colonists  were  also  promised  a  minister 
and  schoolmaster,  "that  thus  the  service  of  God  and  zeal 
for  religion  may  not  grow  cool,  and  be  neglected  among 
them";  also,  that  "the  company  will  use  their  endeavors 
to  supply  the  colonists  with  as  many  blacks  as  they  con- 
veniently can."  Prior  to  this  time  two  "comforters  of  the 
sick"  "read  to  the  Commonalty  there  on  Sundays,  from 
texts  of  Scripture  with  the  Comment."  The  first  Dutch 
minister  in  America  was  John  Michaelis,  in  1628;  the 
first  in  New  Netherlands  was  Everardus  Bogardus,  in 
1633,  who  is  distinguished  in  history  chiefly  by  reason  of 
the  fact  that  he  was  subsequently  the  husband  of  Anneke 
Jans,  of  Trinity  Church  fame ;  the  first  regularly-installed 
Dutch  pastor  in  New  Jersey  was  Guilaem  Bertholf,  who 
was  sent  to  Holland  in  1693,  by  the  churches  at 
Acquackanonk  and  Hackensack,  to  be  educated  for  the 
ministry,  and  was  installed  over  those  churches  in  1 694. 
(A^.  y.  Hist  Soc.  Coll.,  N.  S.,  Vol  /,  pp.  370-6; 

Wassenaer,  reprinted  in  Doc.  Hist.  N.  Y.,  Vol.  Ill,  p. 
42;  Rome^ns  \st  Ref.  Ck  at  Hack.,  pp.  39-40.)     The 


17 

inducements  to  colonists  above  set  forth  were  judicious,  as 
only  by  extraordinary  offers  could  settlers  have  been 
attracted.  Writing  as  early  as  1624,  Wassenaer  (ut 
supra,  p.  36)  w^isely  said:  "For  their  (the  colonies') 
increase  and  prosperous  advancement,  it  is  highly  neces- 
sary that  those  sent  out  be  first  of  all  well  provided  with 
means  both  of  support  and  defence,  and  that  being  Free- 
men, they  be  settled  there  on  a  free  tenure;  that  all  they 
work  for  and  gain  be  theirs  to  dispose  of  and  to  sell  it 
according  to  their  pleasure;  that  whoever  is  placed  over 
them  as  Commander  act  as  their  Father  not  as  their 
Executioner,  leading  them  with  a  gentle  hand;  for  who- 
ever rules  them  as  a  Friend  and  Associate  will  be  beloved 
by  them,  as  he  who  will  order  them  as  a  superior  will 
subvert  and  nullify  every  thing;  yea,  they  will  excite 
against  him  the  neighboring  provinces  to  which  they  will 
fly.  'Tis  better  to  rule  by  love  and  friendship  than  by 
force."  (Ut  supra,  p.  36.)  It  would  have  been  well  if 
the  Dutch  had  always  cherished  this  as  a  motto,  and  for 
England  if  she  had  laid  it  to  heart  a  century  and  a  half 
later. 

Several  of  the  Directors  of  the  West  India  Company 
immediately  availed  themselves  of  the  extraordinary  in- 
ducements above  set  forth,  and  with  a  promptness  that 
has  led  to  the  belief  that  they  purposely  procured  the 
granting  of  these  concessions  for  their  personal  aggran- 
dizement at  the  expense  of  the  Company,  for  the  very 
first  tracts  of  land  taken  up  under  this  "Charter  of  Liber- 
ties," as  it  was  fittingly  called,  were  located  by  Wouter 
van  Twiller  for  Van  Rensselaer,  Bloemaert,  De  Laet, 
and  other  Directors.  One  Michael  Poulaz,  or  Pauw,  as 
he  is  generally  called,  who  had  been  in  the  service  of  the 
Company,  in  charge  of  a  colony  on  the  site  of  Jersey  City 
(De   Vries,  ut  supra,  pp.   257,  259),   "took  up"  that 


"section,"  by  deed  dated  Aug.  10,  1630  (Whitehead's 
E.  /.,  p.  17),  and  De  Vries  says  called  it  Pavonia, 
whence  the  name  of  the  ferry  by  which  we  cross  to  and 
from  New  York,  via  the  Erie  Railway.  [Much  erudition 
has  been  exhausted  in  explaining  the  derivation  of  this 
name.  Mr.  Geo.  Folsom  of  the  N.  Y.  Hist.  Soc.  derives 
the  name  thus:  "The  Latin  of  pauw  (peacock)  is  pavo 
— hence  the  name  Pavonia"  But  the  name  of  the  officer 
generally  called  Pauw  was  doubtless  the  familiar  Dutch 
nickname  or  contraction  "Pau,"  for  Paul  or  Paulus. 
Hence  the  name  "Paulus'  Hook,"  by  which  Jersey  City 
was  most  commonly  known  forty  or  fifty  years  ago. 
Hence,  too,  the  family  name  Paulison,  Powlson,  Powel- 
sen,  etc.  It  is  possible,  even,  that  Pavonia  was  an  Indian 
name,  though  hardly  probable.  The  Indians  applied  the 
name  Arisseoh  to  the  greater  portion  of  what  is  now  the 
lower  part  of  Jersey  City — a  name  perpetuated  in  one  of 
the  steam  fire  engines  of  that  now  metropolitan  city.] 

Several  other  settlements  along  the  river,  at  Hohuk,  at 
Wihac,  at  Tappan,  at  Cemoenapogh  (now  Communi- 
paw — retaining  the  significant  Indian  termination  pau, 
preserved  in  Ramapaw,  Yawpaw,  Pembrepow,  Ramapo, 
etc.,  and  possibly  to  be  found  in  Om-po-ge,  whence 
Amboy),  etc.,  were  made  during  the  next  ten  or  twenty 
years,  but  do  not  seem  to  have  been  successful  in  any 
important  degree.  The  first  colonies  had  all  their  houses 
built  together,  in  a  hamlet,  for  mutual  protection,  and 
during  the  day  the  planters  went  out  about  their  farms. 
Occasionally  the  Indians  would  make  a  raid  upon  them, 
and  thus  the  progress  of  the  settlements  was  greatly  im- 
peded. That  at  Communipaw  was  abandoned  in  1 65 1 , 
and  not  re-occupied  till  ten  years  later. 

The  Allan])  Records  (quoted  in  Whitehead's  E.  /., 
p.  49,  n.)  mention  Dutch  residents  at  Acquackanonk  as 


19 

early  as  1640^;  but  at  that  time  "Acquackanonk" — 
spelled  in  a  score  of  different  ways — seems  to  have  been 
the  name  applied  to  the  whole  country  between  Newark 
and  Hackensack,  from  the  Passaic  river  on  the  west  or 
north  to  the  Bergen  hill  on  the  east,  including  a  large  part 
of  the  meadows.  We  have  no  accounts  whatever  of  the 
history  of  this  neighborhood  prior  to  1 679,  when  the 
"Acquackanonk  Grant"  was  made  by  the  English  gov- 
ernment of  the  Province  to  a  number  of  persons  who  may 
possibly  have  already  occupied  the  country  under  the 
Dutch,  but  who  are  named  in  the  deed  as  being  from 
Bergen,  to  wit:  Hans  Diderick,  Gerritt  Gerritsen,  Wall- 
ing Jacobs,  Hendrick  George,  Elias  Hartman,  Johannes 
Machielson,  Cornelius  Machielson,  Adrian  Post,  Urian 
Tomason,  Cornelius  Rowlofson,  Simon  Jacobs,  John 
Hendrick  Speare  (or  Spyr),  Cornelius  Lubbers,  and 
Abraham  Bookey.  Several  of  these  men  doubtless  came 
over  from  Holland,  1 658-'64 ;  Gerritsen  and  Lubbers 
probably  came  from  Wesel,  in  Holland,  in  1664,  and 
tradition  says  Gerrit  Gerritsen  settled  at  the  site  of  the 
present  Broadway  bridge,  on  the  Bergen  county  side,  in 
1666.  There  were  several  Gerrit  Gerritsens  who  came 
over  between  the  years  named,  from  different  parts  of 
Holland.  "Hendrick  Jansen  Spiers  (same  as  the  above, 
doubtless)  and  Wife  and  two  children"  are  named  in  the 
list  of  passengers  in  the  ship  "Faith,"  that  sailed  in  De- 
cember, 1659,  for  the  new  world.  "Cornelis  Michielsen, 
from  Medemblick,"  came  over  in  the  "Beaver,"  in  April, 
1659.  {Doc.  Hist.  N.  Y.,  Vol.  3,  pp.  52-63.)  The 
tract  embraced  in  the  above  grant  is  now  divided  up  into 

*[This  is  an  error,  due  to  a  mistranslation  by  a  Dutchman  of  a 
document  in  Dutch,  which  Mr.  Whitehead  obviously  was  excusable 
for  accepting.  Meny  years  ago  I  secured  a  transcript  of  the  original 
document,  when  it  was  found  that  it  was  not  Acquackanonk  that  was 
referred  to,  but  Accomac,  Md.    Note,  1912.] 


20 


Acquackanonk,  Passaic  Village/  Little  Falls,  all  of 
Paterson  south  of  the  Passaic,  and  a  large  part  of  Cald- 
well. The  Newark  Toivn  Records  mention  a  commis- 
sion appointed  in  1683  to  run  the  line  between  Newark 
and  "Hockquecanung,"  said  commissioners  being  in- 
structed to  "make  no  other  Agreement  with  them  of  any 
other  Bounds  than  what  was  formerly."  April  6th, 
1719,  the  line  was  renewed,  the  commissioners  "present 
from  Acquackanong  Mr.  Michael  Vreelandt,  Thomas 
Uriansen,  Garret  Harmanusen."  (Newark  Town 
Records,  pp.  94,  128.)  In  1693  the  five  counties  of  the 
Province  (of  East  Jersey)  were  subdivided  into  town- 
ships, and  in  1694,  to  raise  £79  12s.  9d.,  Acquackanonk 
and  New  Barbadoes  together  were  taxed  £6,  15s.,  as 
much  as  Newark,  or  one-twelfth  of  the  whole.  Ac- 
quackanonk would  hardly  undertake  now  to  pay  that 
proportion  of  the  tax  assigned  to  East  Jersey.  In  1699, 
Newark,  Elizabeth  and  Perth  Amboy  joined  in  protest- 
ing against  a  certain  tax  levied  by  the  Assembly,  and 
appealed  to  the  town  of  "Acquechenonck"  among  others 
to  stand  by  them,  but  we  have  no  record  of  any  response 
ever  having  been  made.  (Whitehead's  E.  /.,  pp.  160. 
1 45  ;  Newark  Town  Records,  p.  113.)  If  the  Acquack- 
anonk Town  Records  were  in  existence  from  the  organ- 
ization of  the  township  they  would  throw  a  flood  of  light 
on  its  early  history,  but  diligent  inquiry  has  failed  to  elicit 
any  trace  of  them.  We  cannot  tell  when  a  preaching 
station  was  established  at  Acquackanonk;  perhaps  a 
Voorleser  officiated  here  very  early.  Guilaem  Bertholf 
served  Hackensack  in  that  capacity  as  early  as  1 689, 
probably,  and  not  unlikely  officiated  at  Acquackanonk 
at  the  same  time.  In  1 694  the  church  at  Acquackanonk 
was  fully  organized  by  the  election  of  Elias  Vreeland  as 
1  [Incorporated  in  1873  as  Passaic  Cit3^] 


21 


Elder,  and  Basteaen  van  Gysen  and  Hessel  Peterse  as 
Deacons,  March  18,  1694.  April  16,  1695,  Frans  Post 
was  chosen  Deacon.  May,  1696,  Waling  Jacobse  van 
Winkel  was  elected  Elder,  and  Christopher  Steynmets 
Deacon.  May  2,  1 697,  Basteaen  van  Gysen  was  re- 
elected Deacon.  May  22,  1698,  Elias  Vreeland  was 
chosen  Elder,  and  Hermannus  Gerritse  Deacon.  May 
4,  1699,  Frans  Post  was  re-elected  Elder,  and  Hessel 
Peterse  was  re-elected  Deacon,  In  March,  1  726,  the 
church  actually  had  a  membership  of  197,  and  53  were 
added  during  the  remainder  of  the  year.  In  1  727,  too, 
there  were  twenty-five  births  and  baptisms  in  the  congre- 
gation. {AcquacJ^anonl^  Ref.  Ch.  Records,  fols.  1-5, 
109-111,  329-331.)  From  these  data  there  would 
appear  to  have  been  200  families,  at  least,  in  this  part  of 
the  country.  ^ 

This  notice  of  Acquackanonk  has  been  unintentionally 
lengthened;  but  perhaps  it  may  excite  some  of  our  older 
families  to  ransack  their  ancient  garrets,  closets,  boxes  and 
barrels,  in  quest  of  material  for  a  really  full  history  of 
Acquackanonk,  The  writer  hereof  would  be  very  much 
pleased  to  see  any  old  deeds,  maps,  manuscripts  or  papers 
of  any  kind  throwing  light  on  this  subject. 

But  to  resume:  The  West  India  Company  had  in 
1621  sent  out  Cornelius  Jacobse  Mey  to  locate  colonies 
in  the  New  Netherlands.  He  touched  first  at  New  York 
and  called  that  harbor  Port  Mey,  with  all  the  assurance 
of  an  original  discoverer;  then  he  entered  Delaware  Bay, 
and  called  the  respective  capes,  "Cape  Cornelis"  and 
"Cape  Mey"  (the  latter  retaining  the  name  to  this  day), 
but  he  made  no  settlements.  There  is  pretty  good  evi- 
dence that  the  Dutch  did  establish  a  colony  here  as  early 
as  1  623-6,  which  was  massacred  by  the  Indians,  1 63 1 . 
(Doc.  Hist.  N.  Y.,  Vol.  3,  pp.  49-50.) 


22 


Swedes  settled  on  the  Delaware  between  1631-40, 
retaining  a  precarious  hold,  fighting  the  Indians,  the 
English  and  the  Dutch,  till  at  last  they  were  expelled 
from  their  principal  fort  by  a  "foe  that  appeared  in 
countless  hosts,  alike  incomparable  for  activity  and  per- 
severance, and  obtained  possession  of  the  fort,  and  the 
discomfited  Swedes,  bathed  even  in  the  ill-gotten  blood  of 
their  own  enemies,  were  compelled  to  abandon  the  post, 
which  in  honor  of  the  victors  received  the  name  of  Mos- 
chettoeshurgy  (Cordons  N.  /.,  p.  14.)  All  hopes  of 
Swedish  empire  in  the  new  world  were  effectually  dissi- 
pated by  sturdy  old  one-legged  Peter  Stuyvesant,  the 
doughty  Governor  of  the  New  Netherlands,  who  raised 
the  Dutch  flag  over  the  Swedish  colony  in  1655.  The 
Dutch  governed  this  colony  by  Lieutenants,  who  were 
empowered  to  issue  grants  of  land,  the  deeds  to  be 
registered  at  New  Amsterdam.  We  might  say  here  that 
the  Swedes  bought  the  land  of  the  Indians  and  were 
authorized  by  the  crown  to  hold  it  "so  long  as  the  grantees 
continued  subject  to  the  (Swedish)  government";  full 
sovereignty  of  the  land  was  secured  to  the  crown,  the 
company  paying  an  annual  tribute  to  the  crown,  in  return 
for  which  they  were  granted  absolute  sovereignty.  Under 
the  Swedish  government,  no  deeds  of  land  were  given  by 
the  company;  at  least,  there  are  no  traces  of  any,  except 
those  which  were  granted  by  Queen  Christina.  The 
Dutch  issued  a  great  many  after  1656.  "No  rents  were 
in  the  meantime  received,  since  all  the  land  was  neglected, 
and  the  inhabitants  were  indolent,  so  that  the  products 
were  little  more  than  sufficient  for  their  subsistence." 
When  the  English  came,  the  people  were  summoned  to 
New  York  to  receive  deeds  for  their  land,  which  they 
either  had  taken  up,  or  intended  to  take  up.  The  grants 
were  made  in  the  Duke  of  York's  name ;  the  rents  were  a 


23 


bushel  of  wheat  for  100  acres,  if  so  demanded.     A  part 
of  the  inhabitants  took  deeds,  others  gave  themselves  no 
trouble  about  the  matter,  except  that  they  agreed  with  the 
Indians  for  tracts  of  land  in  exchange  for  a  gun,  a  kettle, 
a  fur  jacket,  and  the  like;  and  they  likewise  sold  them 
again  to  others  for  the  same  price,  as  land  was  abundant, 
inhabitants  few,  and  the  government  not  vigorous.   Hence 
it  appears  that  in  law-suits  respecting  titles  to  land,  they 
relied  upon  the  Indian  right,  which  prevailed  when  it 
could  be  proved.     Many  who  took  deeds  for  large  tracts 
of  land,  repented  of  it  from  fear  of  the  after  demand  of 
rents  (which,  however,  were  very  light  when  the  people 
cultivated  their  lands),  and  on  that  account  transferred 
the  largest  part  of  them  to  others."  which  their  descend- 
ants  doubtless   exceedingly   regret.     {History   of   New 
Sweden,  in  A^.   Y.  Hist.  Soc.  ColL  N.  S..   Vol  I,  p. 
427.)     The  conditions  of  the  Swedish  grants  were  much 
the  same  as  the  Dutch  "Charter  of  Liberties."  but  were 
more  liberal,  allowing  unrestricted  commerce  and  manu- 
factures in  the  new  colony.     Provisions  were  also  made 
for  the  evangelization  of  the  natives.     After  the  Dutch 
conquest  most  of  the  Swedes  left  the  country,  but  those 
who  remained  were  left  in  undisturbed  possession  of  their 
lands,  on  swearing  allegiance  to  the  new  rule.     {Cordons 
N./.,  pp.  12-14.) 

In  1634  the  territory  between  Cape  May  and  Long 
Island  Sound  was  granted  by  the  English  to  Sir  Edmund 
Ployden.  and  the  tract  was  erected  into  a  free  county 
palatine,  by  the  name  of  New  Albion.  He  is  thought  to 
have  established  a  puny  colony  on  the  Delaware,  near 
Salem,  about  1 641 .  but  it  was  crushed  out  by  the  Swedes 
and  Dutch,  and  English  plans  for  the  conquest  of  the 
New  Netherlands  again  came  to  naught.  The  Dutch  at 
this  time  offered,  indeed,  to  sell  out  to  Ployden  their  West 


24 

Jersey  possessions  for  £2,500,  which  not  being  accepted 
they  raised  their  demand  to  £7,000,  and  finally,  became 
indifferent  to  any  compromise,  seeing  that  the  English 
settlement  was  far  weaker  than  their  own.  (  Whitehead's 
E.  /.,  pp.  8-9;  Gordons  N.  /.,  p.  10.) 

There  are  vague  traditions  of  a  settlement  on  the  Dela- 
ware, near  Minising,  by  Dutch  miners,  as  early  as  1  635. 
(Gordon  sN.  J.,  p.  10.) 

Settlements  were  also  made  at  Perth  Amboy  as  early 
as  1651,  when  a  large  tract  of  land  was  bought  of  the 
Indians  (Whitehead's  Perth  Amho^,  p.  2),  and  a  Dutch 
colony  planted. 

Here  let  us  remark,  that  the  Dutch  west  of  the  Hudson 
do  not  seem  to  have  been  particularly  enterprising — not 
as  much  so  as  those  of  New  Amsterdam,  or  New  York — 
but  this  apparent  want  of  enterprise  may  indeed  be 
attributed  to  the  lack  of  information  on  our  part  concern- 
ing the  Dutch  settlers  in  New  Jersey.  For  one  thing,  we 
have  had  no  such  veracious  chronicler  as  Diedrich  Knick- 
erbocker, to  do  for  the  Jersey  Dutch  what  he  has  done 
for  the  New  York  Knickerbockers,  and  'tis  to  be  feared 
the  time  for  such  an  historian  on  our  side  of  the  Hudson 
hath  passed.  Perchance,  were  our  Legislature  as  liberal 
as  those  of  Massachusetts  and  New  York,  in  their  appro- 
priations in  aid  of  historical  research,  the  archives  of  the 
Holland  government  might  throw  a  great  deal  of  light  on 
our  early  history — say  prior  to  the  English  conquest  of 
this  colony — and  might  show  that  the  original  Dutch 
stock  of  this  State  was  as  able,  active  and  intelligent  as 
that  of  any  other  State  or  Colony  in  the  country.  It  is 
to  be  hoped  our  Legislature  will  not  much  longer  delay 
to  procure  all  the  available  material  that  will  throw  light 
upon  our  earliest  history,  in  the  days  when  the  sturdy 
Dutch   "planters,"   as   they   were   called,   still   met   the 


25 

Indian  face  to  face  among  the  forests  or  on  the  plantations 
of  the  New  Netherlands  west  of  the  Hudson,  and  by 
patient  toil  made  possible  the  glorious  present  that  we 
enjoy. ^ 

But  another  element  was  now  about  to  be  introduced 
among  the  settlers  of  New  Jersey — an  element  that  has 
left  its  impress  upon  our  State  not  only,  but  upon  the 
whole  country,  as  a  similar  body  of  men  has  seldom  done. 
The  Puritans  who  come  so  near  landing  about  New 
York  in  1 620,  seem  never  to  have  lost  sight  of  the  New 
Netherlands,  and  forty  years  later  (1661-3)  we  find 
them  corresponding  with  the  Government  of  New  York, 
with  a  view  to  settling  in  New  Jersey  at  the  "Arthur 
Cull" — the  Achter  Koll,  as  the  Dutch  called  it;  i.  e., 
behind  the  hills,  the  Navesink  hills;  from  a  corruption  of 
these  words  comes  the  name  "Arthur's  Kill,"  applied  to 
the  river  so  called.  (See  TV.  Y.  Col  MSS.,  Vols.  IX 
and  X,  quoted  in  NeTvark  Bi-Centennial,  pp.  157-166.) 
These  Puritans  subsequently  (in  1666  and  1667)  settled 
in  Newark,  and  their  descendants  have  since  furnished  the 
State  with  perhaps  a  majority  of  the  men  who  have  been 
eminent  in  legislation  and  government,  to  say  no  more. 

In  all  cases  of  permanent  settlement  up  to  this  period 
the  land  appears  to  have  been  regularly  bought  of  the 
Indians,  and  perhaps  at  fair  prices,  though  now,  of  course, 
it  would  appear  supremely  ridiculous  to  think  of  buying 
all  Essex  county  for  "fifty  double-hands  of  powder,  1 00 
bars  of  lead,  twenty  axes,  twenty  coats,  ten  guns,  twenty 
pistols,  ten  kettles,  ten  swords,  four  blankets,  four  barrels 
of  beer,  ten  pair  of  breeches,  fifty  knives,  twenty  hoes, 
850  fathoms  of  wampum,  two  ankers  of  liquors,  or 
something  equivalent,  and  three  troopers'  coats."  (£.  /. 
i[This  hope  has  been  realized  in  the  generous  appropriations  by 
the  Legislature,  for  the  publication  of  the  New  Jersey  Archives 
Note,  1912.] 


26 

Records,  Lib.  1,  fol.  69,  quoted  in  Newark  Town 
Records,  pp.  278-9.)  And  certainly  $250,  and  $70 
yearly  rental,  would  not  be  considered  a  fair  compensa- 
tion for  the  territory  included  in  Paterson,  Passaic,  Ac- 
quackanonk  and  Little  Falls!  (Whitehead's  E.  J.,  p. 
49.) 

THE  INDIANS  IN  NEW  JERSEY. 

Just  here  let  us  speak  briefly  of  the  dusky  aborigines 
who  inhabited  New  Jersey  ere  the  whites  came.  It  is 
exceedingly  difficult  to  estimate  their  numbers.  Living  as 
they  did,  it  were  impossible  for  them  to  support  them- 
selves in  large  families  or  tribes  close  together,  and  hence 
they  were  doubtless  continually  on  the  move,  or  sending 
off  branches  of  tribes  to  find  new  homes.  People  who 
lived  almost  entirely  by  hunting  and  fishing  necessarily 
required  extensive  tracts  of  territory  for  their  subsistence. 
A  work  published  in  1648  (quoted  in  Whitehead's  E. 
J.,  p.  24)  says  the  natives  in  this  section  of  the  continent 
were  under  about  twenty  kings,  and  that  there  were 
"1200  under  the  two  Raritan  Kings,"  so  that  Mr.  White- 
head estimates  the  Indian  population  of  New  Jersey  (or 
perhaps  East  Jersey)  at  about  2,000,  in  1650.  This 
seems  to  me  a  low  estimate,  that  might  be  safely  multi- 
plied by  five  and  be  nearer  the  truth ;  but  the  data  are  so 
meagre  that  all  figures  under  this  head  are  little  more  than 
guesswork.  From  various  writers  (Wassenaer,  1624; 
De  Laet,  1625;  De  Vries,  1632-43;  Van  der  Donck, 
who  came  here  in  1 642,  being  the  first  lawyer  in  the  New 
Netherlands,  cited  in  the  Doc.  Hist.  N.  Y.,  Vol.  3,  and 
A^.  Y.  Hist.  Coll.,  N.  S.,  Vol.  I,  already  so  freely  re- 
sorted to;  also  Cordon's  N.  J.),  old  Indian  deeds  (the 
Tappan,  Totowa,  Singack,  Acquackanonk  and  Newark 


27 

Patents),  and  local  traditions,  we  have  accounts  of  a  few 
Indian  tribes  in  this  part  of  Jersey,  as  follows : 

The  Sanhicans,  about  Raritan  Bay,  generally  well 
spoken  of;  next  north  the  Reckatvangk  and  Machkenti- 
rvomi  or  Mechkentoxvoon;  then  the  Tappaens,  and  two  or 
three  tribes  at  Esopus.  We  also  have  frequent  notices  of 
the  Indians  of  Ack'mkeshackv,  Hack'mgsack  or  Ack'mg- 
sack,  who  seem  to  have  had  dominion  west  of  the  Bergen 
hill  to  the  Watchung  (Garret)  Mountain,  north  to 
Tappan,  and  southerly  to  beyond  Newark,  one  Oralany 
being  their  chief  or  sakim  in  1640.  (De  Vries.)  West 
of  Garret  or  Watchung  Mountain  the  Pom-pe-tan  or 
Pompton  Indians  probably  held  sway,  and  beyond  them 
the  Ram-a-paughs.  I  have  not  been  able  to  ascertain 
whether  or  not  any  other  Indian  names  hereabouts  were 
names  of  Indian  tribes.  Acquackanonk,  Sicomac  ("Shig- 
hemeck,"  it  is  written  in  the  Totowa  patent,  the  Indians 
reserving  it  in  the  deed — it  is  understood  for  a  burial 
place),  PreaJiness,  Wanaque,  Yawpan^,  Paramus  (or 
"Perremmaus"),  Singack  or  Singheck,  Watchung,  Ma- 
copin,  etc.,  are  quite  certainly  descriptive  names  of  places, 
and  probably  Totowa  refers  to  the  Great  Falls,  which 
were  sometimes  called  the  "Totohaw  Falls"  by  writers  of 
the  last  century.  Possibly,  it  was  the  name  of  a  tribe. 
Unfortunately,  the  person  who  drew  up  the  Totowa 
patent  studiously  avoided  all  Indian  names  of  places, 
except  "Shighemeck,"  or  we  should  have  had  much  more 
light  on  this  subject.  The  Singack  and  Totowa  patents 
are  similarly  unfortunately  defective. 

All  the  Indians  of  New  Jersey  belonged  to  the  Lenni 
Lenape,  or  to  the  Mengwe  or  Mingo  natives,  the  former 
being  called  Delawares  by  the  whites  so  constantly  that 
the  very  name  is  doubtless  generally  supposed  to  be  of 
Indian  origin,  instead  of  being  the  title  of  Lord  Delaware 


28 

or  De  la  Warre,  the  first  grantee  of  the  State  so  called. 
The  Munc\)s  or  Monse^s  were  the  most  warlike  of  the 
Lenni  Lenape,  and  stretched  across  Northern  New 
Jersey.  Their  name  is  preserved  in  a  little  railroad  station 
on  the  Northern  Railroad.  Probably  the  Minisink 
Indians  were  the  same  tribe.  The  Senecas  and  Mohawks 
also  at  times  occupied  parts  of  the  province.  The  Lenape 
and  the  Mengwe  waged  deadly  war  against  each  other 
for  years,  and  the  latter  getting  other  nations  to  join  them 
finally  subjugated  the  Lenapes.  Both  nations  were  sub- 
sequently transferred  westward,  and  their  meagre  rem- 
nants still  survive,  in  part,  among  the  Six  Nations  in 
Central  and  Southern  New  York.  During  the  French 
war  of  1  756  the  Indians  took  part  with  the  French,  and 
under  the  notorious  half-breed  Gen.  Brant  committed  a 
dreadful  massacre  at  the  Minisink  Valley,  near  Walpack, 
Sussex  county.  The  New  Jersey  Legislature  at  once  took 
steps  to  peaceably  extinguish  the  Indian  claims,  and  most 
of  the  tribes  emigrated  to  western  hunting  grounds.  The 
Indians  were  grateful,  and  the  Six  Nations  in  Convention 
at  Fort  Stanwix  in  1  769  in  the  most  solemn  manner  con- 
ferred upon  New  Jersey  the  title  of  the  Great  Doer  of 
Justice.  (Judge  Field's  Provincial  Courts  of  Nerv 
Jerse]^,  p.  5,  n.)  Indeed,  the  Indians  in  New  Jersey 
were  ever  fairly  dealt  with  by  the  whites  in  regard  to 
their  lands,  as  we  have  seen  before  and  shall  hereafter 
find.  When,  so  recently  as  1832,  a  few  distant  Dela- 
ware Indians  claimed  compensation  for  certain  hunting 
and  fishing  privileges  reserved  to  them  by  an  ancient 
treaty,  the  Legislature  promptly  granted  them  full  com- 
pensation, and  thus  extinguished  the  last  Indian  title  to  a 
foot  of  New  Jersey  soil  or  the  privileges  thereof.  At  this 
time  an  aged  Delaware  thus  addressed  the  Legislature: 
"Not  a  drop  of  our  blood  have  you  spilled  in  battle;  not 


29 

an  acre  of  our  land  have  you  taken  but  by  our  consent. 
These  facts  speak  for  themselves,  and  need  no  comment. 
They  place  the  character  of  New  Jersey  in  bold  relief 
and  bright  example  to  those  States,  within  whose  terri- 
torial limits  our  brethren  still  remain.  Nothing  save 
benizens  can  fall  upon  her,  from  the  lips  of  a  Lenni 
Lenappu'     (Judge  Field,  uf  supra.) 

Wassenaer,  in  1624  (cited  above),  has  these  notices 
of  the  Indian  character:  "They  are  not,  by  nature,  the 
most  gentle.  Were  there  no  weapons,  especially  muskets, 
near,  they  would  frequently  kill  the  Traders  for  sake  of 
the  plunder;  but  whole  troops  run  before  live  or  six 
muskets.  At  the  first  coming  (of  the  whites)  they  were 
accustomed  to  fall  prostrate  on  the  report  of  the  gun ;  but 
now  they  stand  still  from  habit,  so  that  the  first  Colonists 
will  stand  in  need  of  protection."  "All  are  very  cunning 
in  Trade;  yea,  frequently,  after  having  sold  every  thing, 
they  will  go  back  of  the  bargain,  and  that  forcibly,  in 
order  to  get  a  little  more ;  and  then  they  return  upwards, 
being  thirty  and  forty  strong."  These  are  the  Virginia 
Indians.  Of  those  of  the  New  Netherlands  he  says: 
"The  natives  of  New  Netherland  are  very  well  disposed 
so  long  as  no  injury  is  done  them.  But  if  any  wrong  be 
committed  against  them  they  think  it  long  till  they  be 
revenged  and  should  any  one  against  whom  they  have  a 
grudge,  be  peaceably  walking  in  the  woods  or  going  along 
in  his  sloop,  even  after  a  lapse  of  time,  they  will  slay  him, 
though  they  are  sure  it  will  cost  them  their  lives  on  the 
spot,  so  highly  prized  is  vengeance  among  them."  "The 
natives  are  always  seeking  some  advantage  by  thieving. 
The  crime  is  seldom  punished  among  them.  If  any  one 
commit  that  offence  too  often  he  is  stripped  bare  of  his 
goods,   and  must  resort  to  other  means  another  time." 


30 

When  at  war,  "they  are  a  wicked,  bad  people,  very  fierce 
in  arms."     (Wassenaer,  ut  supra,  pp.  32,  33,  39,  40.) 

De  Vries,  De  Laet  and  Van  der  Donck,  above  cited, 
all  agree  that  the  Indians  were  in  general  peaceably  dis- 
posed toward  the  whites,  trusted  in  them,  looked  up  to 
them.  But  when  a  young  Hackensack  Indian,  son  of  a 
chief,  in  drunken  wantonness  one  day  shot  a  carpenter 
who  was  at  work  on  a  house-top,  near  Jersey  City,  and 
the  Dutch  Governor  furiously  demanded  his  surrender  by 
the  other  Indians,  one  of  them  with  great  sense  replied: 
"that  the  Europeans  were  the  cause  of  it;  that  we  ought 
not  to  sell  brandy  to  the  young  Indians,  which  made  them 
crazy,  they  not  being  used  to  their  liquors;  and  they  saw 
very  well  that  even  among  our  people  who  were  used  to 
drink  it,  when  drunk  they  committed  foolish  actions,  and 
often  fought  with  knives.  And  therefore,  to  prevent  all 
mischief,  they  wished  we  would  sell  no  more  spirituous 
liquors  to  the  Indians."  {N.  Y.  Hist.  Soc.  Coll.,  Vol  I, 
p.  267.) 

But  the  Indian  is  gone.  His  noiseless  tread  long  ago 
ceased  to  thread  the  boundless  forests,  or  to  course  the 
once  great  "Minisink  Path,"  that  highway  from  the  Rari- 
tan  to  the  Delaware,  via  the  Great  Notch  and  Singack; 
no  more  does  he  sail  along  the  placid  "Pesayack,"  in 
quest  of  the  shad  once  so  plentiful;  nor  does  he  hunt  the 
bounding  deer  or  moose  or  elk  across  our  wild  country. 
He  is  gone,  and  save  an  occasional  flint  arrow-head,  or 
rudely-shapen  axe,  or  infrequent  skull,  or  bit  of  coarse 
pottery,  he  has  left  no  trace  behind  him.  No  trace? 
Ah,  yes!  "Words  are  winged,"  says  Homer,  "and 
unless  weighted  down  with  meaning  will  soon  fly  away." 
The  Indian  has  left  behind  him  that  which  will  never  be 
forgotten — his  local  nomenclature.  The  musical  (and  I 
insist  upon  it  that  the  Indian  words  are  musical)  names  of 


31 

places  that  have  so  often  rippled  through  the  dewy  lips  of 
dusky  maidens  a  century  or  two  ago  seem  by  a  potent 
spell  of  sympathizing  Nature  to  have  been  affixed  forever 
to  the  places  all  about  us,  as  a  "memento  mori,"  to  com- 
pensate in  some  measure  for  the  destruction  of  the  people 
who  first  applied  those  names.  And  so  long  as  the  Great 
Falls  of  the  Passaic  are  remembered  in  song  or  story  or 
the  annals  of  the  chronicler ;  so  long  as  the  bare,  scraggy 
Preakness  mountain  rears  its  rude  barriers  skyward; 
while  the  sonorous  name  Toiowa  clings  to  the  Falls  neigh- 
borhood ;  and  the  peaceful  valley  of  the  Sicomac  reminds 
us  of  the  Indians'  hopeful  burial-customs;  and  the 
Singack  still  describes  the  sunken  flats  or  valley ;  and  the 
Wagararv  yet  reminds  us  of  the  river's  abrupt  bending  at 
Riverside;  and  the  Pequannock  ripples  and  dashes  and 
dances  over  its  rocky  bed  as  merrily  as  the  vowels  and 
consonants  of  its  appellation  do  over  the  tongue;  while 
the  softly-spoken  Wanaque  recalls  one  of  the  most  charm- 
ing of  valleys  and  prettiest  of  streams;  or  the  name 
Macop'm  savors  of  delicious  pickerel;  or  IVatchung  de- 
scribes the  bold  bluffs  of  Garret  Mountain — while  all 
these  aboriginal  names  cling  to  spots  so  familiar  to  us,  and 
so  dear  to  many  of  us,  even  though  their  meanings  be  lost 
to  us,  yet  still  we  shall  not  utterly  forget  the  mysterious 
children  of  Nature  who  came  and  went,  and  whose 
coming  and  going  seem  to  us  to  have  been  only  as  a 
shadow  flitting  across  a  sunny  landscape. 

THE  EARLY  GOVERNMENT  OF  NEW  JERSEY. 

But  this  paper  has  been  extended  beyond  all  intention 
or  expectation.  The  part  of  New  Jersey  history  already 
gone  over  is  so  fresh,  and  has  had  so  little  written  about 
it,  that  an  unusual  interest  naturally  attaches  to  it  in  the 
mind  of  one  with  a  taste  for  historical  research. 

At  this  late  hour  you  will  gladly  pardon  me  if  I  give 


32 

but  the  merest  outline  of  the  leading  subsequent  events  of 
New  Jersey  history. 

First  let  it  be  understood  that  this  whole  territory  was 
included  in  "Florida"  by  the  Spaniards  in  1 535  {vide 
supra)  ;  in  1610  was  called  the  "New  Netherlands";  in 
1648  was  called  "New  Albion"  by  an  ambitious  English 
adventurer;  but  retained  the  name  "New  Netherlands' 
till  1664.  New  York  and  New  Jersey  were  all  this 
time  under  one  Dutch  government,  Wouter  van  Trviller 
being  sent  out  in  1630  by  the  West  India  Company,  as 
above  stated.  He  was  succeeded  in  1 638  by  Wm.  Kieft, 
a  murderous,  cowardly  rascal,  who  early  in  1643  insti- 
gated his  soldiers  to  commit  one  of  the  most  atrocious 
massacres  recorded  in  history,  upon  a  party  of  friendly 
natives  at  Pavonia.  The  redoubtable  Peter  Stuyvesant 
came  after,  and  remained  Governor,  Director-General, 
etc.,  of  the  whole  country  till  1664.  Then  the  English, 
who  laid  claim  to  the  continent  ever  since  Cabot  dis- 
covered it  in  1497,  again  because  Hudson  was  an  Eng- 
lishman, and  again  because  a  daring  English  captain 
(Argal)  had  in  1613  or  1614  compelled  the  hauling 
down  of  the  Dutch  flag  over  Fort  Amsterdam.  The  New 
Haven  settlers  were  very  jealous  of  their  Dutch  neighbors, 
and  once  had  the  temerity  to  attack  New  Amsterdam, 
but  were  promptly  repelled  by  the  doughty  Stuyvesant. 
Foiled,  but  not  despairing,  the  New  England  people 
called  on  the  Protector,  Cromwell,  in  1653,  to  establish 
the  English  claim  to  the  New  Netherlands,  and  he  actu- 
ally fitted  out  a  fleet  for  the  purpose,  but  an  unexpected 
peace  with  Holland  stopped  the  meditated  expedition. 
Charles  II  succeeding  Cromwell  lost  no  time  in  assuming 
the  sovereignty  over  the  Dutch  possessions  in  America, 
and  then  at  once  transferred  that  sovereignty  to  his 
brother,  the  Duke  of  York,  March  12,  1663-4,  who  in 


33 

turn  (June  23-4,  1664)  transferred  to  Lord  John 
Berkeley  and  Sir  George  Carteret  the  sovereignty  over 
what  we  call  New  Jersey.  Up  to  this  time  this  territory 
had  been  identified  with  what  is  now  New  York,  as  the 
New  Netherlands,  there  being  one  Governor  over  the 
whole  country.  The  Duke  of  York  on  his  accession  to 
the  ownership  sent  out  an  expedition  under  Col.  Richard 
Nicolls  to  take  possession,  and  Fort  Amsterdam  peace- 
ably surrendered  to  him  Sept.  3,  1664,  when  the  place 
was  christened  New  York.  The  terms  granted  the  Dutch 
were  so  favorable  that  they  generally  remained  and  be- 
came subjects  of  Great  Britain.  Col.  Nicolls  acted  as 
Governor  over  the  united  province  for  a  year,  and  was 
Court,  Legislature  and  all.  He  prescribed  the  manner 
of  purchases  from  the  Indians,  and  required  a  public 
registry  of  all  contracts  with  them  for  the  soil,  before  their 
validity  would  be  acknowledged. 

In  the  Duke  of  York's  grant  to  Berkeley  and  Carteret 
it  was  provided  that  the  tract  transferred  to  them  should 
thereafter  be  called  Nova  Caesarea  or  New  Jersey — 
because  Sir  George  Carteret  had  been  governor  of  the 
Island  of  Jersey,  in  the  English  channel,  and  had  there 
afforded  a  refuge  to  the  future  Charles  II.  (  Whitehead's 
E.  /.,  pp.  30,  31.)  The  new  proprietors  in  1665  made 
arrangements  to  induce  settlements,  and  proclaimed  a 
written  constitution  for  the  government  of  the  new  colony 
— perhaps  the  very  first  in  America,  for  it  went  far 
beyond  the  Dutch  "Charter  of  Liberties"  granted  in 
1 629.  The  government  of  the  province  was  entrusted  to 
a  governor  (appointed  by  the  proprietors),  and  a  council 
of  6  to  12  persons  chosen  by  the  governor,  and  an 
assembly  of  twelve  representatives,  chosen  annually  by 
the  freemen  of  the  province,  and  this  Legislature  was 
given,  virtually,  absolute  power  in  the  government  of  the 


34 

province,  so  much  so,  indeed,  that  "no  tax  could  be  justly 
imposed  on  them,  without  their  own  consent  and  the 
authority  of  their  own  general  assembly" — which  right 
they  insisted  upon,  and  successfully,  too,  as  early  as  1 680 
(Whitehead's  E.  J.,  p.  81  ),  or  nearly  a  century  before 
that  plea  was  generally  raised  by  the  American  colonies, 
and  with  far  greater  justification  than  in  the  case  of  most 
of  the  others. 

As  Grahame  puts  it:  "Thus  the  whole  of  New  Jersey 
was  promoted  at  once  from  the  condition  of  a  conquered 
country  to  the  rank  of  a  free  and  independent  province, 
and  rendered  in  political  theory  the  adjunct,  instead  of 
the  mere  dependency,  of  the  British  empire.  It  would 
not  be  easy  to  point  out,  in  any  of  the  political  writings  or 
harangues  of  which  that  period  was  abundantly  prolific,  a 
more  manly  and  intrepid  exertion  for  the  preservation  of 
liberty,  than  we  behold  in  this  first  successful  defence  of 
the  rights  of  New  Jersey.  One  of  the  most  remarkable 
features  of  the  plea  which  the  colonists  maintained,  was 
the  unqualified  and  deliberate  assertion,  that  no  tax  could 
be  justly  imposed  on  them  without  their  own  consent  and 
the  authority  of  their  own  provincial  assembly.  The  re- 
port of  the  commissioners  and  the  relief  that  followed, 
were  virtual  concessions  in  favor  of  this  principle,  which 
in  an  after  age  was  destined  to  obtain  a  more  signal 
triumph  in  the  national  independence  of  North  America." 
{Grahame' s  Col.  Hist,  quoted  by  Judge  Field,  ut  supra, 
pp.  38,  39.) 

Philip  Carteret,  brother^  of  Sir  George,  was  commis- 
sioned as  Governor  in  1 665,  sailed  for  New  Jersey,  and 
landing  at  Elizabethtown  gave  that  spot  (settled  a  year 
or  two  earlier)  its  name,  in  honor  of  his  brother's  wife. 
He   made    arrangements    to    settle    Perth   Amboy    and 

i[A  fourth  cousin.    Note,  1912.] 


35 

Woodbridge,  and  the  former  was  the  seat  of  government 
of  East  Jersey  for  a  century  afterwards,  and  to  this  day 
there  are  deposited  there  the  earhest  registers  of  land- 
titles  and  transfers,  from  1676-1702.^  In  1668  Gov. 
Carteret  summoned  the  first  Assembly,  which  met  at 
Elizabethtown,  fifteen  years  before  the  first  Assembly  of 
New  York.  Bergen  sent  Casper  Steenmetts  and  Bal- 
thazar Bayard  to  this  first  Legislature  in  New  Jersey.  At 
this  time  and  for  some  years  later,  judicial  powers  were 
also  vested  in  the  Governor  and  his  Council.  {Field^s 
Provincial  Courts  of  N.  /.,  pp.  — .) 

Under  the  new  government  the  land  was  granted  on 
condition  of  the  payment  of  a  yearly  quit-rent  to  the  pro- 
prietors, of  half  a  penny  an  acre.  In  1 672,  on  one  plea 
and  another,  many  of  the  settlers  refused  to  pay  this  rent, 
and  anarchy  ensued.  Governor  Carteret  went  to  Eng- 
land (leaving  John  Berry  as  Deputy),  and  had  his 
authority  confirmed  by  the  Duke  of  York  and  King 
Charles  himself,  and  Berkeley  and  Carteret. 

Now  the  Dutch  suddenly  swept  down  on  the  country 
and  again  took  possession  of  the  quondam  "New  Nether- 
lands," but  they  interfered  with  no  individual  rights,  and 
the  code  of  laws  promulgated  "By  the  Schout  and  Magis- 
trates of  Achter  Kol  Assembly,"  held  at  Elizabethtown, 
Nov.  18,  1673,  was  very  mild.  A  few  months  later 
peace  was  declared  between  England  and  Holland,  and 
the  American  provinces  were  restored  to  the  English. 

Now  the  Duke  of  York  obtained  from  King  Charles  a 
new  patent  for  New  York  and  New  Jersey,  and  sent  out 
Edmund  Andros  as  Governor,  July  1  st,  1  674,  all  former 
grants  being  reaffirmed.     About  this  time  Carteret's  title 

^[An  error.  These  records  were  transferred  to  Trenton,  in  accord- 
ance with  an  Act  of  the  Legislature,  passed  November  25,  1790. 
Note,  1912.] 


36 

was  renewed  by  the  King,  and  the  Duke  gave  him  indi- 
vidually the  northern  half  of  New  Jersey,  and  Philip 
Carteret  returned  to  assume  the  rule  of  the  province.  The 
southern  or  West  Jersey  half  of  the  province  had  been 
sold  by  Lord  Berkeley,  and  a  few  years  later  passed  into 
the  hands  of  a  company.  The  two  halves  of  the  Province 
were  thenceforward,  for  nearly  a  century,  known  as  East 
Jersey  and  West  Jersey,  sometimes  having  two  Gov- 
ernors, and  always  having  two  Assemblies,  and  their 
government,  mode  of  selling  lands,  etc.,  were  entirely 
different.  The  line  between  the  two  Provinces  gave  no 
end  of  trouble  for  sixty  years.  The  general  course  of  that 
line  as  laid  out  in  1  687  may  be  noticed  on  any  county 
map  of  New  Jersey. 

Gov.  Andros  of  New  York  continually  interfered  with 
Gov.  Carteret,  and  finally  assumed  authority  over  East 
Jersey,  at  Elizabeth,  in  1680;  brutally  seized  Carteret, 
carried  him  to  New  York,  and  had  him  tried  by  a  special 
court  on  a  charge  of  unlawfully  assuming  authority.  The 
court  refused  to  convict,  though  ordered  to  do  so  by 
Andros,  but  Carteret  was  required  to  stay  away  from 
East  Jersey,  while  Andros  went  over  to  Jersey  and  asked 
the  Assembly  to  confirm  him  in  possession.  This  they 
nobly  refused  to  do,  and  asserted  that  the  great  Magna 
Charta  and  the  "Concessions"  of  the  Lords  Proprietors 
were  superior  to  his  claims,  or  even  to  a  subsequent  decree 
of  royalty  itself!  A  few  months  later  the  Duke  of  York 
disclaimed  Andros's  acts,  and  Carteret  was  restored  to 
the  government  of  East  Jersey.  Sir  George  Carteret 
dying  in  1679,  devised  East  Jersey  to  certain  trustees, 
who  offered  it  for  sale  to  the  highest  bidder,  and  in  1 681  -2 
it  was  bought  by  Wm.  Penn  and  eleven  other  Quakers, 
for  £3,400,  and  they  took  in  twelve  other  associates. 


Z7 

Gov.  Carteret  died  December,  1682,  and  was  buried  in 
New  York — the  precise  place  being  unknown. 

He  was  succeeded  by  others  from  time  to  time,  who 
ruled  with  indifferent  success,  the  people  gradually  grow- 
ing more  discontented,  till  in  1  702,  in  response  to  the 
popular  demand,^  the  Lords  Proprietors  resigned  the  gov- 
ernment to  the  English  Crown.  For  some  years  New 
York  and  New  Jersey  were  under  one  Royal  Governor, 
but  this  did  not  suit  the  Jerseymen,  who  were  ever  jealous 
of  their  liberties,  and  thereafter  they  were  given  a  Gov- 
ernor of  their  own.  Of  the  events  that  led  to  the  Revolu- 
tion, there  is  not  time  now  to  speak.  Suffice  it  to  say,  that 
New  Jersey  was  in  the  van  of  patriotic  colonies,  and  her 
Provincial  Congress  proclaimed  the  independence  of  the 
Province,  July  second,  1 776, — two  days  before  the 
immortal  Declaration  of  the  United  Colonies  at  Phila- 
delphia. New  Jersey's  part  in  the  subsequent  Revolution, 
and  her  career  from  then  till  now  has  been  glorious,  and 
unmarked  by  a  single  stain  on  her  bright  escutcheon. 
7  hat  it  may  be  ever  so,  should  be  our  earnest  wish  and 
constant  endeavor. 

^[And  conceding  the  doubtful  legality  of  the  royal  grant  of 
Charles  II,  alienating  from  the  crown  its  sovereignty  over  New 
Jersey.] 


':M':r 


/ 


LIBRPRY  OF  CONGRESS 


0  014  206  855  2