DEO io ANS ar I et
DAMOS
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING SYSTEM
ANNUAL DATA REPORT - 1978
SUPPLEMENT F
NEW LONDON DISPOSAL SITE
Naval Underwater Systems Center
Newport, Rhode Islang
WHO]
DOCUMENT
\ COLLECTION
New England Division
Corps of Engineers
Waltham, Massachusetts
May 1979
HUAN
MBL/WHOI
AN
O 0301 0038442 7?
DAMOS
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING SYSTEM
ANNUAL DATA REPORT - 1978
SUPPLEMENT F
SITE REPORT - NEW LONDON
Naval Underwater Systems Center
Newport, Rhode Island
New England Division
Corps of Engineers
Waltham, Massachusetts
May 1979
T9114 |
L ott ofl
She a | voyouy
ol? cS B ©19°9
? a ae punos
al AE pueyey
Tr. a desasy -W403 weaen Buc
A jeey MON UjeZSeeH
dryeqy6r4 ucyz6e0g
puncag [ned
usze0g
eyleoys
eft IC
SNOILVIO1 3LIS
W4LSAS SNIYOLINONW
sueraey VauVv TVSOdSId
WV 0
oe Ne
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING SYSTEM
This is one of a series of site specific data reports resulting from the
DAMOS program, now two years in progress. DAMOS is the culmination of
nearly a decade of prior study efforts, actually preceding NEPA, which
have been directed towards the understanding of the effects of and the
responsible management of the ocean disposal of dredged materials in
New England waters as they fall under the authority ot the New England
Division of the Corps of Engineers. The individual site reports hence-
forth will be updated approximately on an annual bases as additional
knowledge is gained, at least with respect to those sites where signifi-
cant disposal activities will have occurred.
NEW LONDON DISPOSAL SITE
The New London Disposal Site (Fig. F-1) has been the most active disposal
site in New England during the past several years. A major dredging project
in the Thames River, sponsored by the U.S, Navy, has resulted in the disposal.
and subsequent monitoring of large quantities of spoils at this site., Al though
the first two years of monitoring effort were sponsored by the Navy, .a summary. -.
of data is included here as subsequent studies will be conducted under the. DAMOS.
program.
The site is located south of the Thames River and west of Fishers Island
Sound in 20-24 meters of water. Sediments in the area are generally fine sand
providing a good acoustic reflection. In the northern portion of the disposal .
site a "relict" disposal pile is present, formed from previous but: unknown
dredging operations.
Bathymetry
Navigation control for bathymetric surveys in the New London area is
provided by shore stations at the New London Lighthouse and at Millstone Point.
The navigation grid in this area has been used extensively during the past
four years and has proven to be extremely stable and reliable.
Bathymetric surveys of the New London disposal site have been made almost
semi-annually since 1974 in an effort to monitor the development and aerial
extent of the spoil mound.
Following the end of Phase I dredging a survey was made on March 10, 1977
(Fig. F-2) prior to dredging or disposal of Phase II spoils. Consequently,
this survey provides a baseline description of conditions existing at the site
as a result of the Phase I dredging project. The spoil pile was an elliptical
SEAFLOWER
eit
N.
DUMPLING
@® WS
ee,
Ss. pune Xe °
SARTLETT
REEF
ews
La) NIE IN
LITTLE SULLQ!.
@
BSREAT BULL YP
Yo
E
ane
yoga ;
ae eA:
cle INGE OAT
SM Bes 7 SUS
eS
¢ eS
OO (7
GNUEING (Fi FEE
a
Pg
mound oriented slightly from northwest to southeast. The minimum depth in the
northwest was 20 meters and in the southeast 18.5 meters. Because the first
spoils to be dredged under the Phase II program were to be of the worst quality
from the dock areaS, it waS decided to dispose of them just northeast of the
southern portion of the mound, so that they would be covered by cleaner spoils.
In order to accomplish this, a second buoy was positioned at the suggested
disposal point.
The second survey (Fig. F-3) on September 12, 1977, indicated that this
technique had been successful. There was a distinctive build-up of the mound
northeast of 41°16'N, 7294.8'W, the center of the southeast portion of the
Original mound.
This build-up extended east to 7294.6'W and north to 41916.1'N. However,
because of the concentrated disposal effort that began in June, 1977 the top
of the mound had reached a minimum depth of 14 meters by September. Although
this adequately covered the poor quality spoils, the minimum depth is above a
safe limit relative to effects of wave action. Consequently, NUSC initiated
movement of the disposal point northward and scheduled an additional survey
on October 26, 1977, to saeBteh GARE the effects of this action.
The resulting survey (Fig. F-4) indicated a corresponding northward shift
of the spoil boundary in the affected area close to 1692'N. The minimum depth
increased to 16 meters, probably due to a combination of compaction and winnow-
ing at the shallower depths.
Following the October survey dumping continued at the new disposal point
until a fourth survey was made on March 8, 1978 (Fig. F-5(a-k)). This was
the first New London Survey to make use of the updated BDAS system. Although
the rate of disposal was less during this pericd, the build-up at the designated
point was readily apparent. The mound changed to a triangular shaped pile with
| CAT? ep
is NSIC BIGa
Feat BZ
a Fi) |
OT a
oe
a
bh ANH CW) X
Z2OB | asd aasi BSE 1 aad i 4350! 206 Ast aag ASH AGE asi B
aoe —— po
£& 3NHO
8001 @S9! oOS!i Ose! oaBzt aso! wa6 BSL aa3 @Sh MoE as! a
wap
Z SHud
a8 1 Aso! aa3s! ASE | 4421 4501 aa6 @sz 449 BSh MUE 43S! 1%]
(einige CW) x ane
CoG | “sol aos! OSE! 2821 asa! 4206 ASL aag9 G@3Sh AWE 4351 a
4} i) peu
Sa
SN ee ee
Silk
XS!| « NOILYYS9OOHXS THO! Oi-
LYAA
WAS : THANSLN! ANH
BL6! “’HD>YHW 9
1 MAN
53) Bis) | CW) X
(4071 led 5S) II BOS! BSE! Haz! Osa! 446 Bszd 409g OSH
2S ee —— a a
os ee ea See
= ee eel CW) X
GUG}ES ff (E3} SSS} Bas! OSeE1 Haz! Osa! U6 BSZ aug MSH BQE Osi
he f) seeoenelin + a ee 4 4 =
AS | > NOILHYS99HXKS WH)!
La3
WHOS = IHANYSLNI ANH
BL6!| “’HDOYYW
a 4S)
2 20 9) 7) CW) X
(e2(guu Bf ms9! 2a3s!1 MSE! 1] a =a | 43521 O06 ASz mag ASh AOE asi Fa
ei Se ee ee eS ee ee ee ae 4
le
—~ tee ee eee oa
i SBS CW) x ae
(iat | SU SS'S) {I aasi OSE! Baz | 4s! Q06 Osz2 00g Q@3Sh MOE asl @
ee a ee ee ee a ee eee ee =
ee Sis
zi ANH CW) X
onl osgl amas @SE1 aGz 1 asa! BAG
ace Vee raeere) Se ee ee ee ee
11 ANH CW) X
aees as9! aa3s! OSE! aaz1 asa! A446
SS) 6 —$$——$ $$$ ts
ul 3NHW7 CW) X
GPO Sia asgl aa3s 1 ASE! aaz !) asa B46
se --}-- —— —4- --—-———+4
apy & aa9g @Sh aac 43S!
eee
6 @NHD CW) X
OM! asgil aasi BOSE! uaz! Oso! B46 Aszd 0a9 Sh BE as!
4 eat) ce SE eg eT a a ee a SE
XS! «© NO'LHYSSSYXS THOIL
WOS | TIWASLN!I 4
BLE! “HD
NOGNOW
YaA
Nu
w 9
MAN
Sil
Bl-
5 ----4--
-—} = oe
-4+—- --
us | 3rnud CW) X
Bee! o3s9! Bas! MSE! AZ! 4s 1 OO6 ASL oag ASh OE 43s! fa)
a a eS oa Se Sa
; Sze
a2e-
: Si-
a | S3NH7 CW) X mi
M1799 4 Bsgil a0351 ASE! Maz! asa! ABBE Oszd 009 Q@Sh ABE Aas! a
Se ee ee ee
| ES
Sp ee Eg ea ee NG ee ey Bs Oy et ee ee
a2-
sSi-
tot SIRI CW) X So
[ESE {| asgl 4a3s! ASE! a4Gz 1 asa! 446 ASL 4a9 @Sh AGE Aas! 7a]
- {=== === 4 _—__f}—__—_—__f—_————_ 4 — —
sS2-
ee
Q@Z-
Sri
et Bn. CW) X Fetes
ere} I Assit 2u3s 1 MSE! Oc | asa! B46 A@sz2z 4ag9 O@Sh AOE 43s! 44]
rr Se eee ae a =
_—_— Or "
SS ee eee
Sl-
XS! > NOILHNS99YNxXa AWDILYaA Buss
WHS : THAMSALNI SNH
AL6'| “HDNYW YF
NOGNOW M3aN
82 SANT
CW) xX
NAB! @S91 @@S! OSE! pez! aso! 206 asL aug 2Sh Qe
o> - ———_ —__}-—
ee — =o ee AS
6! 3Nuq CW) xX ai-
G2ut M39! 28S! ASE! opet ase 206 WSL 209 a
Sh a
BS ore Vea ee ee ee
szZz-
——_—_-_—_———or- roa peg
Ss az—
Sl-
2 ee | ele CHD xX are
Booed || he Ss) I Mus! (1b | QZ 1 4s@a 1 446 OS2 449 ASh ABE
1 - Si es iS. A) eee aes ee :
Se a a aa ere
él Signy a1-
SOA |) Hy Ss] |) as! MSE} 1] rea | Osa! 406 OSL 489 A@Sh BABE
{ hemedal) oad}
XS!o¢ NO'tHNagguX]a THD 1 LYSA Bil
WOS : THASLNI 3NHO
B46! “HDNHW Q
NOGNOW MSN
he SNH CW) X
ol Goll ee Bxsqg!) 443s! ASE! az! Osa 1 O66 ASL 409 BSh AGE asl {%]
a 4 oo —— — 4 n n
Si
Be-
a Ssi-
EF? oe | CW) X pIi-
(EHEUCG |] oOSsgi 1 Go | OSE! 4a2!1 43a! 406 ASL m72a9 OSH Bae As! 4
1 ---= a a Sage
a@2c-
Si-
or ATL CW) x Bi-
eloe He] cpa eth ORS! MSE! 442! 03501 BO6 BSL 4a9 BSH OBE asl Qa
a |) SS NP ae a ee ee ee aE a ne
ae ee RG
SS eee az—
Sil-
ineed Se U NB Y CW) X a1-
See eel Bald 4mS1 MSE | OAc 1 03501 OO6 As Oa9 @Sh BOE asi "4
i [foe ere for —4 SS H - —__f -————_ —_4 —_ SS Ss ===
a ree
B2z-
Sl
x3S | ' NOILYYS9OSYXS WO! LYSAA Bi-—
W OS +: DHWANYSLNISNHT
BL6| “HDHNHW VQ
NOQGNOWT MSAN
82 3NY7 CW) xX
Hoe! OSS! BOS! BSE! gaaz! aosel O26 454 285 OSH 2oBE~ asi a
—-- -4-—_———_——_4 ———4 ——-
42 3Nuq CHD Xx ie
288! OSS! Gast OSE! gwezi aso ma6 ASL aag BSh aoe as! a
nt =
ge eS a ee
92 SNH
Bi-
(402721 4s91 Bas! BSE) Baz | Bs! 48065 BSL Hag @Sh ABE as! a
Be Aas =
Si
SS a Se ao
Ss Se Be-—
: : SS
Se cahltad CW) X aI
Pew IMs} Sats) |] Bas! Q@SE! Haz! Bsa! O06 Bst was @Sh BBE OS! B
SN
XS! +: NO'ILEYYS9SYHXS TWDILYNSA
W4aS :' TYAMNALN!I ANHD
BL6!| “HDYHW YG
NOOGNOWT MAN
a fairly large lobe of sediment in the northeast corner. In general, the top
of the spoil mound was not as flat as it appeared in past surveys, and the
entire pile seemed more conical than before. The minimum depth had increased
to 15.5 to 16 meters over most of the pile.
As a result of this survey another change in the position of the disposal
point was initiated that moved the site southward. Disposal at this new posi-
tion continued until completion of. the dredging operation in June, 1978. A post
disposal survey was then made on August 1, 1978 (Fig. F-6(a-k)) that showed the
final mound had a general elliptical shape with a major axis from northwest to
southeast. The minimum depth of 16 meters found in the October, 1977 survey has
remained stable throughout this periade
The BDAS system provides excellent precision in surveying and analysis of
bathymetric data. This is shown in Figure F-7 where a series of transects are
superimposed to evaluate changes in bottom topography. From these data, it is
apparent that no major changes in topography are occurring at the New London
site and even minor topographic features can be reproduced over a period of
several months.
Although no major changes in topography have occurred at New London, there
is evidence for change in the character of spoils following disposal. A cross-
section across the spoil pile that was taken from east to west during the oetater
1977 survey is shown in Figure F-8. This profile was obtained using a Raytheon
Dual Frequency Fathometer System that is used in conjunction with the EDO 4034-A.
The lower frequency (7 kHz) allows penetration of the sediment for sub-bottom
profiling while the higher frequency (200 kHz) provides an accurate measure of
the sediment-water interface.
ry
hy a0 Be) CW) X
ieee (OAS) (14S 1 OSE! 4821 Os! AH6 O52 Oa9 OSH OBE Os! a
Se ee ee ee ea =
tO a peed
a Paes € aoe
AS Sie
= sa CW) 54
ae CSE OBS! fat. ! O07 1 Os! 406 OSL 0093 OSH OBE Os! Q
4 ool cat ee Sat) a 4— ++. —_ ————————— — —— = ee
ee ae “az:
ad
oS ee ae
—_ =
S|
CW) XK ‘oO:
we Buy | a} HE. fl O02 1 QOS0 | Ob ON/ 009 OSh OE: OS! 0
BRR oes) ce Ste seat ce ee re eee 7] Sees
Ws
eS eee] Oz-
ch aie > pete ee PS ee
SS} {) 8
oe chia % ance
en bana U bale | OM 1 Os! OO OS/. Hea Eels) OStr OBL OS | 1}
+ a 4 SS} SSS e4tf Sats at Se 2 = — § = = "Sa. -4 =
fe MS ee an teen aN po O¢
Sie
i=
bo (HSS) 8 UN Area ILIN EIA
yah! WEES SASS <3 as) ay
(civ, Cilils 1
INTE GING > fs as
9s
8 3NH7 : CW) xX : a
Bee)! @s9)! aas! BSE! 8az! Oso! Ba6 OSz Bag ‘@Sh°
“£ 3Nu7 | . are
098! @S9! @0Si OSE! ape: oso 2065 asc go
9 3NH7 Be es CW)
O86! 839! @ASt OSE! opz! eso
S ANHT ‘ : CW) x
908! @S9!' @@S! ose! gozl aso pas OSL vag QSh
QHeE
WON =A
,
Zi 4nd CW) xX
moa) Osa AoSt BSE! pezt ose aa6 OSz2 20g BSb DOE ast a
ee er ae, :
act CW) XK
aon eat bo ee [ealiea) SS} © BSE | OO-e |! Osa! QQb OS
a ee ey Se een =
S|
14 CW) K “=
i ieee (na | [es] Slee 00¢ ! DSO! 206 ESy2 0093 OSh BBE asi 4
t : sss) So scot a fo SSS <= = 2 =| SS ——+-—- -—___4—- — so. ---—
aN ee ee
3S} 6
Cho % 1
Heber eln Ho SHE | BOd ! OS! MQ6 ASL O09 OSH OOE OS! 0
= ee ee eee +- = 4 Sa cs
ee ae :
= a so RM a eda Bt oe wee 6
eee a
Bl
W Dos TBANSALNI INU
5 ii PNO i LYN ANDOW SA TWD! LANAA
ely, (oii) 4
SIS GINO) a IMbesie;
4
ae = a CW) X
Osa! eos! OSE |! Gz 1 4@xsal 206 ASzZ am9 OSH BBE asl a
EN ee ee eee
See —o—ooO Pr SUAS i ee
ha ee
a2-—
Sil
Fbta CW) X
(G3) 5} 454) |} OAS OSE | O02! Qs! O06 OSL 009
a Se
2114 CW) x
G52) OOS! Ost! paei oso 206 ASL ong
Se = 4-4 —_- ___4 5p + +
wets y CW) Xx
ea} si!) Boas! MSE | 0021 Oso! M06 ASt 009
a ES a ee eee
W OS = TH/ANSLN: INH
S| NOI LYNAOQSYN| THD! LYSA
BL Ont |
NOGNOW MAN
[7-7 230 11 05] CW) X
Wu Hoe 0 ips) |) Ois 1 MSE | 02! 450! 446 MSz2 amg O3h ABE
4 SS SS —— -- ==
SSeS
OS eee See
S
5 SHH Sts CW) XK
(tseauts Tes ale OOS: DSE |! 002! Osa! O86 OSL 009 OSth BOE os! 4]
4 A + -- -—- —f--—— ——_ — 4 —-— SS SSE SS = = — = > =) = 5
, an—]| S77 --
pie Spec AL ee
I Si QOc--
Swik
fe ‘ GND eZ fe
eae eas cout os) | ay SHE. fh OO2! 4s@a! BOQ6 ONS/ 009 Sh BBE Sse 1%}
cota, Nas se fen = = 4 ———_f —_-. —_ ——_- === 5 SSS a] 2 See SSE = ——s =o = =
~~ =. aaa = ~ ee RS Ty Ve aes
5 |) =
7 CH) x
cohen Perth Ges fl Se | wazi asa U6 MSL ong
; —- ee re —t +— - + =
PE ig ie OE SS SS Sh wr
MW OS 224A g LN 1 MVE
Sa INO iets Slay al A> 0 LSal7
Ft (Bee) el |
NOGONOT MAN
== fj
beac 2 EIA CW) X
ISUy asgl Bas! MSE | O02! asl - 206 B54 ana 43h HE aS! a
SS SS oe = t | | $=
LIFT
a ne
Si-
EZ Anite CW) XK Bl --
Tidy Oso) oos! OSE! OBe2! asl O06 OS/. 40g Sth BOE as! Q
ac 4 i ——-—}- — or
re — A000 CW) xX
On) 859) OOS! GSE! oboe! ose! 206 aS nog OSH OOE
a ee ee ooo oo $+
$< sh ____
a eae
50 0 4 CW) x
: BS esi Use) ate) asa 206 OSL oo09g QSh DOE
' mopar t —+— 4 a a os ee
a ee ee
WMS =: VUAXNSLN: ANU:
S! ¢NOILHASROSDHNS THOT LYAA
O/. OM !
NGGNOW MAN
ea are SZ-
pz
“Sis
B94
‘ CW) X
HOS! MSE | 442 | asa! M46 asz2z 4409
a ree o — 4+ —+
CW)
OWS! WSE |} Oa- | Zt see
a re
CW)
Kegs ERS UA? | Oso! 206
Be
igs
MSL
———_ 4 sss
O19
CW) x
oes) U BES “ac | OS! 0O6 (ay) /L 19
= ea} fp +. ——- j— -
———
US (as) 2 lel ISIN
33 I NIB} o Lois SalSye}o ss) Tah
O24
NOdGN
(7 fee SANYWd CW) X
ragyes —Sat Oos! OSE) aoez2! Oso! DO6 Bsz2 a2a9
Sa a ee Se a eT -—
»
i& Sit CW) X
LPM) § Oso Hs 1 MSt | OoO7 1 Oso! 406 Ost 4409 BSH OBOE O31) [4]
) soda « a eS ee Sa ee
"Pye CW) x
2s al SD PASE) Glee) lS) 206 as/ no9 “Sh ABE
ee en pea ee, AA i} ip —
Was Sire CW) XxX
oe at os HES 9 iS 1 Ost) OMdZ! Oso) 006 MSc omg O3Sh MBE OS!
a SS aes eer ==
———™ OS =: TEASALN
N! SNL
SS! ¢ NOIMLHNS9ISYNSA GHDILYAA
B82 Nw !
NGOGNOW MAN
cit nthe CH) xX
Cio) Sl PAS! MSE! oozt asa 2oO6 as/. nag QS BOE
4 - -f ---- ee ——_—+—_ —___§__1——__ —_}+—_ es
Se ee ere
Sth anv Shod CW) XxX
Seok ISM) GSO MSh0 miki 0 eisai 206 OS/. nog QS BOE
ye eee oe — —_— =<
~ en ee
tli
f WS 8 GIS 1 Bille s Sele DU6 OS 009 OSh ODE Ss!
. tp +— — -——+——- -—_4--
Pa ae C a
We. Ge eee
CW) K
Soe Siieon} )r<4ll el )o\[-) O06 232 Hug ASH MOE
; es ae a ioe oo aeeeg peat eet
en wa OO a Sie Sees
SS
Dez -
St-
BI -
WO THe aLNI JNU
Ss NDI 262! 3I99N49 WD) LeaA
(B/E URINE) !
htGNO” MAN
v7 =
4
saute ball CW) ZX
as 8 PAS! OSE! oBaz| asl Bo6 OSL ang Sh DOE Bs! a
(le ee See
az—
S [ce
Bi-
W OS = THAMALNI @NUT
Si ¢NOlLEHNA99UXS WWD! LYAA
AL YN |
NOCNO 1 MAN
a
Ln
SK HLAS
5 oe aS
15H LT =
A SLIT. SS
LRLLLEE SS
SEO LS2 S250), SS
SEL OR. <
y SESS SoS. S
SOS SLRS LS J
ee Sas a
z SLOG LS o, / © |
Z SL26 g \ MI ERD
LOOSE KO) VANS. |
C SESS Soe NA IES |
| BREESE 18 fT 2
RELISTS SS FL) OL IL
| LE ess Sl SA fi Li SORE
| SESS : x WEAN fb fe Soe
! KS SOS Se wien aS : a ; A
i < ens Lo TY AG) ae
SOT OO x es
ESSN SLY Ly)
CTO K IM
RL Ky poe ‘y
5X SX OSs
ro WA) ek
KE
95¢ Sh
3) GONE
MaEA
Ye
F-2
seanm eee Tome en
San a E
men Ae OS wpe tt ales bane
sagt 4
Rial a oe 5 0
aaa OR ee oh mene
2 > otra gape
SEYLER IMT Pop POI R RENE PTY «SRR = '
poate mma con FF mcm mTOR PAT TOLMAN ome 8m FP APE ERT SPYA PIO AFPO OUT: POPSET es STH PAP es PR TMTPAITRTA YeP(eTSPREPA A! eM
The profile shows a clear distinction between the flat-topped, transparent
older Phase I pile and the rough, translucent Phase II pile. Future consolida-
tion and setting of the Phase II pile may result in a similar profile to the
older pile in the future.
Currents
Cne set of current meter data for the New London disposal site is presented
in Table F-1 and Figure F-9 (a-c). These data are similar to records previously
obtained at this site, as they are dominated by an east-west tidal flow that
results in a net drift to the east.
An interesting feature resulting from the use of motion ellipses for analy-
sis is the fact that major tidal flow is in a northwest southeast direction
althoug the net drift is nearly due east. This condition further emphasizes the
need to look at shorter time intervals to evaluate the effect of currents on the
stability of dredge spoil. If net drift were the only criteria used to predict
where effects of spoiling might be present, then one would be looking in the
wrong location since all transport would be along the axis of motions.
The New London Site is one of the most active sites in terms of water move-
ment. The horizontal kinetic energy of 333 dynes/sec is made up of 80% tidal
energy and is therefore continuous and predictable. This is evidenced by the
fact that the highest 10% speed of 44 cm/sec is only slightly higher than the
peak tidal speed of 42 cm/sec.
H
TABLE F-1
a ee SS
Total OBS. Tidal Cur-| Residual Mean
rent Inc.
Current Mean Current | Current
Semi -major axis
(cm/sec)
Semi-minor axis
(cm/sec) 168 7.50 8.85 “
Direction
| (OT) | 058 | 060 074 zs
energy ihe 333.30 263.10 89 .46 19.30
|
Lo? gees speeds
| (cm/sec )
|
|
|
|
Peak speed
(cm/sec) 4] .59 z
Average maximum
speed (cm/sec) - 32 .44
23.2 21.68 :
|
|
Sediments
Heavy metal analyes of sediments from the area of the New London disposal
site are presented in Table F-2. Those samples in the closest Proximity of the
dump site are generally quite different from all the other New London samples.
The samples over one half mile from active dumping show no enrichment of metal
and are among the cleanest in the whole region, comparing well with Brenton
Reef and Cornfield Shoals. Since the effect of contamination from metals can
not be identified in samples other than the three closest to the dump site, we
may state that the effect of dumping metal containing spoil in New London is
restricted to one half mile or less.
a: (SAHQ) 3WIL |
Bz - wel a8 a9 Boh wz
il \ iil i HAALLD |
DASJHD 2 © GH/AMSINI 03345
ce NW
srahahatandanndamahadadakadh,
&
a? + ThANALN!
BL /1iddH 2! OL BL /HNYUH BZ
NOGNO1 MIN
(235/W>) CAa3d5
CL SIEKED) HG
8 92 A hz
| Mh
BL /11ud L2 OL BL 411d Zl
NOGNO1 HAN
WT
'
Ve
VV
WANatakhnbnfar
(SAWQ) SHIL
}
==
I35/U) 2 © WABALNI 93309
=~
el tad
3Z = WANZLNI 3
5 =
iA rm
(235/W)) 0330S
i.
°
3
~
CSAHQ) SWIL
42h 4° @h @ BE =| 3 @ hE Ba 2eE
24S.W) B © TAMSIN: O54c5
(945/W>) Caad5
1 Bag
UAMALNI &
26
3Z &
@ pal
BL /11Nd4 AEOL AL /11udd L2
NOGNO1 MAN
ae i
| A\ 4
ACHE mG
Q@ ble ~
B QE
(69) wlS,e00e2
a uG° LE.SLOLP an 816 1/34aS/o2
(89) uS2,P00zZ :
uG° 2S,SLoly 826 |/3d8S/0z
: 99) 100,S002Z.
1801 9Loly 826 1/34aS/0z
u€2. 9Lolt
1801 90022
n8E,ILolt
wll. L0o02eZ
n60,ZT9 lol
nS5S: 0022
alt 8261 /Sny/z
9S, p0o02Z
n0° SLi vO002Z
u8°70.9Lolp | 8Z6L/YueH
savy $39034ud Savud $3903ud Y313W
S27 AWS JIHLNIG * §73SSNW S31dWVS JIHLNIG S1asSSnW IN3uuNd 3Lva
JLIS J9NINIIIY 29LIS IWSOdSIG
uOpuo] MAN *3LIS
SNOTLVIOT F1dWvS
e C4
F8
New London
41° 16.5!
Au
e ig
Dredge #1
Aug
178 @
‘ Dredge #2
@cCurrent Meters @ Benthic Samples
All Sept. '78
Unless otherwise
labeled
Fy) b
z0T ¥ “a's
S 6 4 % dowd
47 LT 4 9T PR FO 8-d
9€ "1 96 TI 9-a
OT te 9°9 “#6 6-9
6T 6Z 9T 8-9
€€ LZ 94 8y 9-9
6T Or 4° 4 9-9
Eee Wears te9 = 465). €-9
EO 6S E96 O87 T-9
Titan Ony ee ORG 9T €-O1-V
8L6T LL6T LL6T 8L6T LL61T LL6T 8L61 LL6T Te qunyy
ddS UW adaS uv ddS UW dis ww daS WW diS uw uoT3eIS
Wdd “WAIWOWHO Wdd ‘*LTVa00 Wdd “WNIWGVO
8461 tequejdes pue g/6T UoAeH ‘//6T Jequaades ‘7/6, YoreEW
SUOFIeIS 23FS dung uopuo7T man
SISATVNV TVLAW ‘SINAWIGaS aovauns
&¢-d AIAVL
Wy
90°
L0°
Gc"
C0)”
(E\C~
70°
CU"
CO”
dds
YT
60° GS)”
CC” GIL~
L0° Gy”
8c"
(ae 67°
£0" €T°
SO ~
TO° 80°
60° 87°
8L6L LLot
dv das
Wdd ‘AYNOUHW
zor * “a's
€ iL dodda
oT" 8-4
te od
Tee 6-9
80" 8-9
62" 9-9
90° 9-9
LO" eso
SO" 6
fee €-01-¥
L161 BL6T LL6T LL6T LL6t LL61 Te quny
advW dds av dis dvW di $ dvix da$ adv uoTIeIAS
Wdd pul xX “NOUI hdd *WdddOd
8L61 tequeqdes pue g/6T yoaeW ‘7/61 Tequeadas ‘//GT Yyoury
SUOT}EIS 82TS dung uopuoT may
SISATWNV TVISN ‘SINAWIGES ZOVAULS
Gé-4 ALaVL
zor x “a's
ST €T S dowd
i te 19 8-a
(GL 98 yd
a7 i 8 6-9
Ly ‘19 8-9
es mW Gol 9-9
om 8 LUE 9-9
GSE omacy, 1-282 €-0
oe Se a 1-9
Sem aCe gaan OC €-UT-V
8261 LL6T mh TS 8ZoT Llot LOI Toquny
dds dv dd$S adVW dds av dds av dds UvW ddS avW uoT7B8IS
Wdd “ONIZ Wdd ‘Qval Wdd “THON
8L61T tequeqjdes pue g/6T yoreW *//6T Aequieqades *//6T yoreW
SUOTIEIS 8997S dung uopuoT moy
SISATVNV 'IVLAW ‘SLNAWIGaS dOvaUNs
9-A AWIAVE
8¢
OT
SE
aS
O°L
oS)
0°?
B°e
Ore
dds
S
Eas OT 7°9
c°9 Sal €°6
7°C 9°€ T’€
OS S-{5
9°9 €°9 c9
€°6 8°47 wee
€°T eT 6°¢
6°T So" 8°0
GPG Siac 8°T
8Z6L LLOT LL61
adv dS av
SGITOS ATILVIOA 7%
8161 tequejdes pue g/6T yore, *//61T taqueardes ‘7/61 YyoueK
dds
Wdd
8L
ST
a 2
tA be
iP) @
[Y Ee
Len) dH
i?) [?)
> >
ie-) oo
[ [=
re ies]
6T LLOT LLO1
av dis advh
OL * *ASVANd/T10
€
SUOTIEIS 393TS dung uopuoyT mey
SGII0S ATLILVIOA CNV GSVAYD/TIO “SINAWIGHS ADVAYNS
Res el slileNat
Tequny
uot3eIs
Benthic Biochemistry |
The study of Mytilus edulis at the New London site is an ongoing program
sponsored by the Navy that has been reported elsewhere. An example of the
results of this study is presented in Figure F-10. The data for Nickel were
derived from Mytilus edulis monitoring stations at New London disposal site.
During the predisposal period (March to August, 1977), the ratios of Ni were
all within the 95% confidence limits of the baseline data, which are delineated
by a set of broken lines. Elevated ratios (up on 12 times of the baseline data)
coincided with periods of heightened disposal activities from September 1977 to
February 1978. As the disposal activity subsided in March 1978, the ratios (except
DI) quickly returned to within the 95% confidence limits. The observed rise and
fall of the ratios which correleated with the dumping activity were also apparent
in mussels from the reference area (North Dumping) which is located two miles
east of the disposal area. However, the magnitude of the rise is much less than
those stations located on or near the dumping area, attesting that M. edulis is
a sensitive environmental monitor. -
Future work at New London will be sponsored by the DAMOS program and should
provide continuous data over long time periods.
Benthic Macrofauna
Although there have been extensive studies of benthic macrofauna conducted
under the Navy monitoring program at the New London disposal site, a more general
approach has been taken for the DAMOS program that is similar to sampling tech-
niques used at other sites. Thus, a station on the disposal site and a reference
station are compared. The peswiles of the numeric density data are presented in
Tables F-3 and F-4. These stations are quite different in that the reference
station has higher diversity, (H) and more total number of anadvdials although
the disposal site station had a predominance of A. vadorum.
(wniopeA *y JO suewtoeds c¢g 103 pezde1109)
8T¢ = NOILVLS SIHL STVNGIAIGNI dO # TVLOL
LZ°0 09°0 GL UL 6°O GLO SL°OQ Ge ALITIGVLINvA
, 89.°0 COT 48°7 ¢CI°T OV°2 SE°T (,H) ALISUYHAIC SHIONaS
Z°LL -0 T'0z SORE 09 97 O€ 9 ADGHYA Wad ddS JO # TVLOL
9° T61-U 0°SS O°SS O°SS S9T LIL 9€ ral TVLOL
g°GL 8°T 8 S26 =H) SO 9°0 Ga 7 Z iL T sndaevoTsuoT snangeg */T
FITOGT oy
8°EL 8°T 8 O°k =O T°” Gag €°T v7] v7 0 0 snzTeydscs0x0yg °9T
Once Sia 8 Ord =O Tey, E°@ SOT 7 v7) 0 6) eJequep STIOYG “CT
Gale 8°T 8 OL =(0) reg (S°@, Goal 7) 7 0 0 eatpqe eostjtoduy ‘HT
7°39 Gaal 8 U°S -0 8°T Gaal Gab v7) € 0 T (eJepun) eqzeqsy “ET
9°99 8°T 8 Soy =O O°T 6°71 faa 7 @ z 0) Faedooy stq2eTAS “ZT
8°79 Sac l 7°¢ =0 7°T Gait LOT G € G 0 SNJeTOAAF AJeouegQ “TT
¢*zy €°7 L 6°9 -0 Gad 102% At S 7 U if espTout sAyqydeyn “yt
Z°09 Gaz l 6°9 -0 S06 E°@ Lor G v7] T Q sUuoitjT{Noe ojoreyduy “6
6°LS 5° L eS =) eo Gor AOL G € Z 0 eutxoid e—Tnony °g
9°SS g°Z 9 5°77 —O S°O) Onur O°? 9 € Z T SfTPe10q eTpaed0TIA;) */
8°7S [L?fg ¢ 7° OT-0 Gag EE LC 8 9 @ G eTurTyje esnieyg °9
1°69 L°E S 6°6 -U ees 6°72 Lh @ 8 9 T ii euenysiow 4eITG °C
7°SY €°8 v7) 6°€7-0 L°8 Cae 0°9 ST me. Q wnjeTjuT ewSerqtpTeos *y
Eo LE L°8 € 9° €€-0 EGU Uleala €°9 6T 6T O G SfWAOFLUSA eTTTwWejog “¢
7° 8Z EON Z 7° L0-U 0°6 T'8 Gul (aC Or 9) 0 BJeAOAAT eTOTouy, °*Z
Casi €°8T T 1° 6C-U Ze c°9 C°Sr Ov OG Gil fl SeddtisTu s0uIN “‘T
TVLOL dO % TIWLOL ANVU NVAW dO NOISYAdSIG NOLLVIASG NVAN IVLOL €#. ZH Ti Salads
TAWA 40 % OIYSWON SLIWIT ‘4NOD 40 ‘dd500 CdaVUNVLS YEdWNN azoqTUG INVNIWOGHud
LNAOWdd S6
SLol TlddV ZT - dLIS dwid NOGNOT MAN
VIVG ALISNHY@ OLYSHNN 40 4TXVL - SOHLNAd SOWVG
€-d ATUVE
TOS = NOILVLS SIHL STVOGIAIGNI 4O °ON TVLOL
ST°O 6TL°0 €8°O 47S°0 (,f) ALITIGVLINO”
0Ss°0 679°Z OO (S22 ONNS LO)? (,H) ALISUSAIG Sa1Oaas
7°€S-0°92 GeG L°6€ GL v7 OY <c¥ ADGaUd Wad ddS dO ON TIVLOL
Z°€7E-O 0°9S 6°18 L°6IT 6SE€ 09 98 €12 TVLOL
ete ec 1 L ~°L 0) O°T Nov Ove 6 (4 S Z euenyiiow 1eIFd 6
6°69 «=8'T L (aaa) €°Z 9°Z O°e 6 0 7 ¢ SNJCIIFGFAI SNfAesseN °g
CO Olac 9 QPL 0) L°0 Gaal SOS OT Zz € ¢ SNJeLOITF epopoun °*/
199 SOs 9 022-0 L°0 Gaal €°€ OT g G € STUTJJe esntsyd °9
UG — EP ¢ 7°71 -O €°€ GS ane ie v7) l 0) suoijzpqnoe ojereyduy °¢
GU) °C 7] 0°02 -0 8°41 Ga €°9 6T 0 6 OT WNAOpeA eoSTTeduy *y
T°8S) =62°9 € L°4z -0 Ze g°S S°Ou es L alee soddjti3fu s0uIN “¢
Gels = 726 Z 7°87-0°€ LOT L°G Age iy OT Oe LE STAPTTOO ououAToOnNG °Z
9G (5 °C T G°1TLZ-0 8°16 2°03 OL Ere OG 6l 49T STINpS SETFIAW “T
TVLOL TVLOL XNVU NVaW 40 NOISUAdSIG NOILVIASG NVAW ‘IVLOL €# Ciel SaL0adS
40 % dO % OLWSWNN SLIWII °4NOD 4O ‘daad00 G'aVCNVLS MaGWAN aAGaUa INVNIWOGaUd
> IAWNO INKOUdd S6
VIVG ALISNGG OLYHWAN FO WIEVL -— SOHLNAd SOWVG
Y-d aldo
y dulis
xX North Dumpling Mytilus edu
® Di
o Dil
Ni A Dill
12
10 A
8 Oo Oo
@
6 x
x
g 8 m9 va
oe
®@
fe) 4
eS SS ee ee ee es ee
2 be I
CO) Kate ty ax | 2
x x ; ;
O ED Se
2 Cu
@ :
ne te
3 4 6 8 10) Sl2eeeoe | | 4
"27 78
Figure 10. Temporal variation in the ratios of heavy metals in Mytilus edulis from
New London. monitoring sites: DI, DII and DIII, as wel? as North Dumpling, a
reference site. Broken lines represent the 95% confidence limits of the
baseline data.
Fisheries
This program is in the preliminary stages and results presented here are
subject to expansion and more detail.
Lobsters. Pr. L. Stewart of the Conn. Marine Advisory Service has studied
lobster distribution at the New London site by examining six locations (at the:
corners and center of the dumping area and at the dumping buoy) and counting
lobsters seen in % hour. He concluded:that lobster density was a third of that
found in productive lobster grounds in the general area and that the monotonous
sandy bottom was poor lobster habitat.
The seasonal pattern of the lobster fishery in this area varies with the
size of vessels. Smaller boats may begin fishing very close to shore in April
and work their way out to the Race and Plum Island by August. Larger boats will
move from: ledges along the Connecticut shore to deeper parts of the western
Sound by June and into Block Island Sound by the end of summer. Lobsters are
Caught within hte Thames esturay in the spring. Waters around Fishers Island
are reserved for residents. The greatest concentration of pots is in the Race
where migrating lobsters are caught.
At any one time, commercial lobstermen will occupy a continuous area,
frequently following a topographic feature. In the dump site area 2-3 pot
trauls are usually used.
A fisherman who had pots just south of the disposal site in June, 1978,
reported that fishing at the site was very good during its use for disposal of
organic waste by a pharmacentical manufacturer, but had dropped off when Navy
dredging began.
Finfish, The area inshore of the disposal site is used by a small number of
draggers during the summer. The catch is predominant by winter and summer
flounder although some scup is also caught. A total of 10 boats may fish in
this area at one time or another, but only one or two are regular users, the
others are lobster boats which occasionally drag.
Fishable ground is shown in Fig. F-11. One fisherman reported that he
formerly crossed the old dump site, but stopped after catching construction
stone in'his net.
Blueback herring are caught in this area in the fall when they are present
in the region (not 1977, 1978).
The most important sport fishing areas are near the Race. The target
species (blue fish and stripped bass) are Probably little effected by spoil
disposal since they normally enter turbid estuaries.
The rocky extension of Seaflower Reef is a site of tautog fishing. Some
bottom fishing for flounders is carried out a mile N.W. of the dump site by
Party boats. Recently a small boat sport fishery for summer flounder has de- -
veloped around the perimeter of the spoil mound,
lo.
iz
3115S WWS0d5!10d NOGNOT MAN
JO ALINIDIA SHL NI SS3lXSHSI4
4315201
4Y315H01
Se eee
ONISSHYd YA0Nno014
‘eran ems a ogee
q
- 4
ot.
44
‘
\
.
iy A
ay
ee
oie itp)
}
?
4
; i
t
4 x
he
rel
m
u
» S
:
t
a Me
ler qin
1 f i
J Hy t
i ‘
t
1 € %
y
”
«
ih
f ‘
4
’ '
4 1
’
3
Senora
1.
a * ty w
hb ! if
;
1 a wy,
Pars
a OH
i
i} 4 a
i
tae |
,
é
a!
i
ye
%
i :
i ' |
4 |
{ ‘
8 b
:
t oh
'
; '
A
=
A
bat
'
Gf
t
o 2) ny bay
tt ‘
i ee} ae
fe ZA exes Hi tn ali Ait ag |
wy
eon itbtenlale ae ie ERR Lap
Meer