The divinity of the Book of Mormon proven by archaeology
Bookreader Item Preview
Share or Embed This Item
- Publication date
- 1908
- Topics
- Book of Mormon
- Publisher
- Lamoni, Iowa : Zion's Religio-Literary Society at the Herald Publishing House
- Collection
- brigham_young_university; americana
- Contributor
- Harold B. Lee Library
- Language
- English
Includes index
"A series of papers formerly published in the 'Arena' Department of the Autumn Leaves."
Flake, C.J. Mormon bib.
1 9
"A series of papers formerly published in the 'Arena' Department of the Autumn Leaves."
Flake, C.J. Mormon bib.
1 9
Notes
No TOC.
- Addeddate
- 2009-07-09 18:19:23
- Call number
- DCZ4723
- Camera
- Canon 5D
- External-identifier
- urn:oclc:record:1043048865
- Foldoutcount
- 0
- Identifier
- divinityofbookof00palf
- Identifier-ark
- ark:/13960/t3708hw4m
- Ocr_converted
- abbyy-to-hocr 1.1.37
- Ocr_module_version
- 0.0.21
- Openlibrary_edition
- OL23420789M
- Openlibrary_work
- OL254966W
- Page-progression
- lr
- Page_number_confidence
- 96
- Page_number_module_version
- 1.0.3
- Pages
- 270
- Ppi
- 400
- References
- Flake, C.J. Mormon bib., 6078
- Scandate
- 20090709225626
- Scanner
- scribe1.provo.archive.org
- Scanningcenter
- provo
- Full catalog record
- MARCXML
comment
Reviews
Reviewer:
Maxwell Silverhammer
-
favorite -
January 10, 2022
Subject: The Constant Struggle of LDS
Subject: The Constant Struggle of LDS
Archeology is silent towards the Book of Mormon. This book dances around the fact that there are other cultures and artifacts but NOTHING to shore up the frail story in the BoM.
No one has ever positively identified where or exactly when anything recorded in the Book of Mormon supposedly happened. Mormons cannot even conclusively identify or even agree on which of the American continents (North or South) to look for any such evidence. There is precisely zero evidence that any person in the BoM’s New World narrative ever even existed. We have exactly no evidence of any of the BoM’s 100 named western hemisphere cities. There is no evidence of the BoM’s massive wars of extinction ever actually occurring. And while the Bible’s original languages are massively well attested and nowhere ever even disputed, the simple fact is, we have no evidence or any reason whatsoever to think that Joseph Smith’s “Reformed Egyptian” ever even existed. As with ALL things Mormon, there is but one, single sole source for the original claims for its existence: one man. Joseph Smith. The single-source nature of the Book of Mormon and for the entire Mormon religion is entirely consistent with the explanation that Joseph Smith, alone or with conspirators, faked the whole thing. If Smith lied about the Book of Mormon, we rightly expect that there would be no evidence for the simple existence of the BoMs various human civilizations. There is no such evidence.
If Smith lied, we rightly expect that there would be no evidence that any of the named “Jaredites”, “Nephites”, “Mulekites”, or, in the goofy words of Smith himself, “all manner of ‘ites'” named in the BoM. There is no such evidence. If Smith lied we should find precisely zero evidence of any of the historically significant events described in the BoM, such as the extermination of the massive “Nephite” civilization. No one has ever found any such evidence.
If Smith lied, we should never find any evidence of Joseph Smith’s “Reformed Egyptian” language. There is no evidence of any kind to suggest such a text type ever existed.
If Smith lied, we should expect to see a pattern of similar lies throughout his life, beginning before his self- appointment as a supposed, “prophet”. There is plenty of evidence of this, from the testimony of his own mother to his wild imagination to the affidavits of his neighbors and the victims of his scams to his conviction for crimes generally lumped today under the legal heading of fraud.
If Smith lied, we should be able to find similar kinds of speculations about the history of Native America that preceded Smith and from which he could have “borrowed” to create the BoM. We do. Spaulding, Adair, Ethan Smith and many others had been writing similar stories beginning over 100 years before Smith was even born. And the King James translation of the Bible actually appears, quoted verbatim, and anachronistically in many places throughout the BoM. In other words, the state of the evidence has always been and continues to be entirely consistent with the explanation that Joseph Smith was a lying fraud who faked his alleged, “revelations from God” or that he was delusional and actually believed his own psychotic episodes. The one explanation that none of the evidence supports is the notion that Smith was telling the truth. We serve a Holy and Just God – this is the good news. He has blessed us with the Holy Spirit to guide our thoughts. Praise God!
No one has ever positively identified where or exactly when anything recorded in the Book of Mormon supposedly happened. Mormons cannot even conclusively identify or even agree on which of the American continents (North or South) to look for any such evidence. There is precisely zero evidence that any person in the BoM’s New World narrative ever even existed. We have exactly no evidence of any of the BoM’s 100 named western hemisphere cities. There is no evidence of the BoM’s massive wars of extinction ever actually occurring. And while the Bible’s original languages are massively well attested and nowhere ever even disputed, the simple fact is, we have no evidence or any reason whatsoever to think that Joseph Smith’s “Reformed Egyptian” ever even existed. As with ALL things Mormon, there is but one, single sole source for the original claims for its existence: one man. Joseph Smith. The single-source nature of the Book of Mormon and for the entire Mormon religion is entirely consistent with the explanation that Joseph Smith, alone or with conspirators, faked the whole thing. If Smith lied about the Book of Mormon, we rightly expect that there would be no evidence for the simple existence of the BoMs various human civilizations. There is no such evidence.
If Smith lied, we rightly expect that there would be no evidence that any of the named “Jaredites”, “Nephites”, “Mulekites”, or, in the goofy words of Smith himself, “all manner of ‘ites'” named in the BoM. There is no such evidence. If Smith lied we should find precisely zero evidence of any of the historically significant events described in the BoM, such as the extermination of the massive “Nephite” civilization. No one has ever found any such evidence.
If Smith lied, we should never find any evidence of Joseph Smith’s “Reformed Egyptian” language. There is no evidence of any kind to suggest such a text type ever existed.
If Smith lied, we should expect to see a pattern of similar lies throughout his life, beginning before his self- appointment as a supposed, “prophet”. There is plenty of evidence of this, from the testimony of his own mother to his wild imagination to the affidavits of his neighbors and the victims of his scams to his conviction for crimes generally lumped today under the legal heading of fraud.
If Smith lied, we should be able to find similar kinds of speculations about the history of Native America that preceded Smith and from which he could have “borrowed” to create the BoM. We do. Spaulding, Adair, Ethan Smith and many others had been writing similar stories beginning over 100 years before Smith was even born. And the King James translation of the Bible actually appears, quoted verbatim, and anachronistically in many places throughout the BoM. In other words, the state of the evidence has always been and continues to be entirely consistent with the explanation that Joseph Smith was a lying fraud who faked his alleged, “revelations from God” or that he was delusional and actually believed his own psychotic episodes. The one explanation that none of the evidence supports is the notion that Smith was telling the truth. We serve a Holy and Just God – this is the good news. He has blessed us with the Holy Spirit to guide our thoughts. Praise God!
799 Views
DOWNLOAD OPTIONS
For users with print-disabilities
IN COLLECTIONS
Brigham Young University American LibrariesUploaded by RichardBean on