Skip to main content

Full text of "The echinoderms of Peru"

See other formats






Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 

VOL. LII. No. 17. 


- T. J<1 NCAID 

6 S~ 






A. AGASSIZ. V.B General Report on the Ex- 

A. AGASSIZ. I. 1 Three Letters to Geo. M. 
Bowers, U. S. Fish Com. 

A. AGASSIZ and H. L. CLARK. The Echini. 

H. B. BIGELOW. XVI. 16 The Medusae. 

H. B. BIGELOW. The Siphonophores. 

R. P. BIGELOW. The Stomatopods. 

O. CARLGREN. The Actinarians. 

S. F. CLARKE. VIII. 8 The Hydroids. 

W. R. COE. The Nemerteans. 

L. J. COLE. XIX. 19 The Pycnogonula. 

W. H. DALL. XIV." The Mollusks. 

C. R. EASTMAN. VII. 7 The Sharks' Teeth. 

W. G. FARLOW. The Algae. 

S. GARMAN. XII. 12 The Reptiles. 

H. J. HANSEN. The Cirripeds. 

H. J. HANSEN. The Schizopods. 

S. HENSHAW. The Insects. 

W. E. HOYLE. The Cephalopoda. 


C. A. KOFOID. III. 3 IX. 8 XX. 20 The Protozoa. 

P. KRUMBACH. The Sagittae. 

R. VON LENDENFELD. XXI. 21 The Siliceous 


H. LUDWIG. The Holothuriaus. 
H. LUDWIG. The Starfishes. 
H. LUDWIG. The Ophiurans. 
G. W. MULLER. The Ostracods. 

The Bottom Specimens. 
MARY J. RATHBUN. X. 10 The Crustacea 


W. E. RITTER. IV.* The Tuuicates. 
B. L. ROBINSON. The Plants. 
G. O. BARS. The Copepods. 
F. E. SCHULZE. XI. 11 The Xenophyophoras. 
H. R. SIMROTH. The Pteropods and Hetero- 


E. C. STARRS. Atelaxia. 
TH. STUDER. The Alcyonaria. 
JH. THIELE. XV. 15 Bathysciadium. 
T. W. VAUGHAN. VI.8 The Corals. 
R. WOLTERECK. XVIII. 18 The Amphipods. 
W. McM. WOODWORTH. The Aunelid.8. 

Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. XLVI., No. 4, April, 1905, 22 pp. 
Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. XLVI., No. 6, July, 1905, 4 pp., 1 pi. 
Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. XLVI., No. 9, September, 1905, 5 pp., 1 pi- 
Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. XLVI., No. 13, January, 1906, 22 pp., 3 pis. 
Mem. M. C. Z., Vol. XXXIII., January, 1906, 90 pp., 96 pis. 
Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. L., No. 3, August, 1906, 14 pp., 10 pis. 
Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. L., No. 4, November, 1906, 26 pp., 4 pis. 
Mem. M. C. Z., Vol. XXXV., No. 1, February, 1907, 20 pp., 15 pis. 
Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. L., No. 6, February, 1907, 48 pp., 18 pis. 
Mem. M. C. Z , Vol. XXXV., No. 2, August, 1907, 56 pp., 9 pis. 
Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. LI., No. 6, November, 1907, 22 pp., 1 pi. 
Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. LIL, No. 1, June, 1908, 14 pp., 1 pi. 
Bull. M. C. Z , Vol. LIL, No. 2, July, 1908, 8 pp., 5 pis. 
Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. XLTIL, No. 6, October, 1908, 285 pp., 22 pis. 
Bull. M. C.,Z., Vol. LIL, No. 5, October, 1908, 11 pp., 2 pis. 
Mem. M. C. Z., Vol. XXXVII., February, 1909, 243 pp., 48 pis. 
Mem. M. C. Z , Vol. XXXVIII., No. 1, June, 1909, 172 pp., 5 pis., 3 maps. 
M ;m M. C. Z., Vol. LIL, No. 9, June, 1909, 26 pp., 8 pis. 
B-ill. M. C. Z., Vol. LIL, No. 11, August, 1909, 10 pp , 3 pis. 
Bull. M. C. Z., Vol. LIL, No. 13, September, 1909, 48 pp., 4 pis. 
Mem. M. C. Z , Vol. XLL, August, September, 1910, 323 pp., 5G pis. 

Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 

VOL. LII. No. 17. 





OCTOBER, 1910. ? , 



No. 17. 2%e Echinoderms of Peru. By HUBERT LYMAN CLARK. 

The following report, prepared at the request of the Ministerio de 
Fornento, of the Peruvian Government, as a contribution to the knowl- 
edge of the aquatic resources of Peru, is for use in connection with 
marine investigations in that country, though the needs of the general 
zoologist and particularly of those chiefly interested in the fishes and fish- 
eries of Peru, have been kept in mind. The keys are therefore as simple 
as possible and are based, so far as practicable, on obvious external char- 
acters ; they are consequently very artificial. The report is based pri- 
marily on the collection of echinoderms made by Dr. Robert E. Coker 
in 1907-08, and I am glad to express my thanks to him for the oppor- 
tunity to study the collectio^ and for the use of his field notes and 
other data. In addition to the species found in this collection I have 
included all the echinoderms actually known to occur south of the equa- 
tor and north of 40 S. latitude, and which may therefore be reasonably 
expected to occur on the coasts of Peru. I have not included any species 
described from such indefinite localities as " west coast of South Amer- 
ica," " Chile," " Ecuador," or " west coast of Colombia," unless they 
have since been recorded from the given coastal area, excepting such 
rare cases as Holothuria chitensis, where the genus is a tropical (or sub- 
tropical) one and the species is described as from Chile. The collec- 
tion in the Museum of Comparative Zoology, which contains many South 
American species, a large number of which were brought home by the 
"Hassler" expedition, has been of great assistance. In it were found 
two new starfishes. 

The Peruvian echinoderm fauna is not a rich one. There are no crinoids 
known from the region, and only seven holothurians and ten ophiurans. 
The echini are represented by a dozen species, and the starfishes by 
twice that number. Clearly the starfishes are the predominating fea- 
ture, and this would be even more striking if the numerous species de- 
scribed from Ecuador and Colombia, some of which may ultimately be 
found on the northern coast of Peru, were included. It is interesting to 
note that the Peruvian marine fauna is made up of two quite different 
elements, that from the Panamic region hd that from the Chilean. The 
latter furnishes all of the echinoderms found* south of Aguja Point, 



6 S. lat.j while the Panamic fauna is practically confined to the 
shores north of that point. In spite of its low latitude the coast of Peru 
south of Aguja Point is far from tropical, and the marine life is dis- 
tinctly that of temperate seas, owing to the great Humboldt or Peruvian 
current, which brings the cold waters of the antarctic region down nearly 
to the equator. 1 

Of the fifty-four echinoderms included in this report, twenty-one are 
found only on the less than two hundred miles of coast north of Aguja 
Point, while of the remaining thirty-three species only about a dozen 
really characterize the succeeding shore line of over twelve hundred 
miles. Some fifteen species occur both north and south of Aguja Point, 
while the range of at least half a dozen species is practically unknown. 
A more detailed analysis of the fauna brings out some of its most inter- 
esting features and reveals the striking contrast between its two com- 
ponents. North of Agnja Point the following twenty-two species have 
been taken, none of which has yet been recorded from far south of there. 
Those marked * are in the Coker collection. 

*Astropecten erinaceus *0phiothrix magnifica 
fragilis spiculata 

peruvian us Gorgonocephalus panamensis 

*Luidia Columbia Arbacia stellata 
Nidorellia armata Echinornetra van brunti 

Oreaster occidentalis *Encope micropora 
Paulia horrida Mellita pacifica 

Phataria unifascialis * stokesii 

Ophioderma panamensis Lovenia cordiformis 

Amphiodia grisea *Agassizia scrobiculata 

Hemipholis gracilis *Thyone gibber 

Three of these species (Astropeden peruvianus, Amphiodia grisea, 
Ophiothrix magnifica) seem to have a very restricted range, as they are 
not known from north of the equator, but the remaining nineteen species 
are distinctly Panamic. To these nineteen should be added Pharia 
pyramidata, the occurrence of which south of Aguja Point is open to 
very serious question, and the single specimen of Mithrodia bradleyi, 
labeled "Arica," is not sufficient proof of its occurrence south of the 
Panamic region. The new Luidia phragma probably belongs in this 

1 For an account of the characteristics of the Peruvian coast see Coker, Bull. 
Bureau of Fisheries, 1910, 28, pp. 335-340. 

- ^ . 


group also, but the exact point on the South American coast where it 
was taken is not known. The Panamic element in the Peruvian fauna, 
therefore, contains twenty-five species, but many of these must be of 
irregular or rare occurrence, since only nine are in the Coker collection. 
South of Aguja Point twenty-six species have been taken. 1 Of 
these, two (Luidia bellon&e and Stichopus fuscus) have a remarkable 
range, extending from the Gulf of California to Chile and (in the case 
of Stichopus) even to Patagonia. Another (Heliaster polybrachius) is 
known only from the Peruvian coast in the vicinity of Aguja Point 
(say 3 30' - 7 30' S. lat.) and certainly cannot be classed with the 
Chilean f uina. The little ophiuran taken by Coker near San Lorenzo 
Island, off Callao, is apparently Amphipholis pug 'etana, a North American 
species ; it is certainly not A. laevidisca, known from Chile; the genus 
is cosmopolitan, and some excellent authorities consider that A. squa- 
mata is equally wide-ranging, and they would doubtless refer these Peru- 
vian specimens to it. Deducting these four species, there are twenty-two 
which may fairly be referred to the Chilean fauna. Of these, the follow- 
ing eight have been reported from north of Aguja Point : 

Asterina chilensis Tetrapygus niger 

Stichaster aurantiacus Arbacia spatuligera 

Heliaster helianthus Strongylocentrotus gibbosus 

Ophiactis kroyeri Phyllophorus peruvianus 

These species are all in the Coker collection, but the specimens of 
Phyllophorus were not taken north of 9 S. lat. Of the remaining 
fourteen species supposed to occur along the southern shores of Peru, 
only Strongylocentrotus albus was taken by Dr. Coker : 

Tosia verrucosa Asterias gelatinosa 

Odontaster singularis Amphipholis laevidiscus 

Asterina calcarata Amphiodia chilensis 

Parasterina obesa Podophora pedifera 

Echinaster cribella Strongylocentrotus albus 

cylindricus Cticumaria leonina 
Henricia hyadesi godeffroyi 

1 The exact localities where Of>hidiaster lu^wigi, recorded from "Perou," Holo- 
thnria chilensis from " Chile," and Colochirus peruanus from "Peru," were taken are 
unknown, and they are omitted from this discussion. 

* **> 



The'Tosia, Asterina, Parasterina, both species of Echinaster, and the 
Amphipholis are known only from the original specimens (all but one of 
which were from Chile) and have not been met with by other collectors* 
The Odontaster and Henricia are species of the far south and are in- 
cluded in this list only because each has been reported once from north- 
ern Chile, near Iquique ; their occurrence on the Peruvian coast is quite 
unlikely. The Asterias and Amphiodia and both Cucumarias are Chi- 
lean species, which very probably occur, at least occasionally, in Peruvian 
waters. Although there are specimens of Podophora in the M. C. Z. col- 
lection labeled as from "Valparaiso" and "Callao," it seems extremely 
improbable that these specimens were actually collected in South Amer- 
ica, for the genus is a highly specialized one, characteristic of the Indo- 
Pacific region, and it could hardly have escaped the notice of such 
collectors as Plate and Coker, if it occurred on the coasts of either Chile 
or Peru at the present day. It is clear, then, that the known Chilean 
element in the Peruvian fauna is very small, and all of the species which 
undoubtedly occur were taken by Dr. Coker, except an Echinaster and 
a Cucumaria. x South of Aguja Point, then, one may expect to find, in 
suitable places, four species of starfish (Luidia bellonae, Asterina chi- 
lensis, Stichaster aurantiacus, Heliaster heliantkus), one ophiuran (Opliiac- 
tis kroyeri), four sea-urchins (Tetrapygus niger, Arbacia spatuligera, 
Strongylocentrotus albus, S. gibbosus), and one holothurian (PTiyllophorm 
peruvianus). North of Aguja Point, however, one finds a much more 
varied fauna and may reasonably expect ten or more species of starfishes, 
(three species of Astropecten, two or three of Luidia, Nidorellia, Oreas- 
ter, Paulia, Phataria, Pharia, Asterina, at least one Heliaster, and, possi- 
bly, Stichaster), several ophiurans (Ophioderma, Ophiactis, Amphipholis 
or Amphiodia, possibly Hemipholis, and two forms of Ophiothrix), eight 
or ten sea-urchins (Tetrapygus, one or two species of Arbacia, Echino- 
metra, Strongylocentrotus gibbosus, Encope, one or two Mellitas, Agassizia, 
and perhaps Lovenia), and one or more holothurians (Thyone, Phyl- 
lophorus, or Stichopus). 

Starfishes. Asteroidea. 

The starfishes comprise riot only almost one half of all the echino- 
clerms known from the Peruvian region, but also the great majority of 
the conspicuous or structurally interesting forms. More than half are 
large species, reaching a diameter of over five inches, and several rank 
among the largest known starfishes. The twenty-five species represent 



eighteen genera, of which five are known only from the west coast of 
Central and South America. Ten of the species are not known outside 
of the region included in this report, while eleven others are well-known 
Panainic species. There can be little question that most of the starfishes 
came to the Peruvian coast from the north. We know too little about 
Tosia verrucosa and Parasterina obesa to be positive as to their origin, but 
they probably came from the south. The two species of Asterina may 
have come from the south, but it is quite as possible that they are of 
northern stock. Odontaster is unquestionably a southern genus and 
Henricia liyadesi certainly came up from the south. The south also 
may be considered the home of Asterias gelatinosa, which has hardly 
reached the Peruvian coast yet, and while there is lack of definite evi- 
dence bearing on the point, Stichaster aurantiacus may be considered as 
an immigrant from the south. But with these exceptions the starfishes 
of the Peruvian coast are undoubtedly of northern (Panarnic) origin. 

In discussing the characteristic features of starfishes, a few terms require a word 
of explanation. In many species the dorsal skeletal plates develop vertical, table- 
like outgrowths, called paxillae; the tops (tabulae) of these paxillae are square, 
oblong, polygonal or more or less circular, and are usually so crowded as to form 
a second covering to the dorsal surface of the animal, between which and the true 
surface there is a more or less considerable space, traversed vertically by the 
columns or stalks of the paxillae ; the tabulae bear spinelets or granules along 
their margins and on the free upper surface, and sometimes the central spinelet 
may develop into a conspicuous spine. The sides of the rays in many starfishes 
are defined by an upper and lower series of plates, the supero- and infero-marginals ; 
in some starfishes the marginal plates are very large and conspicuous even in the 
inter bra chial areas (i. e., the space on the body between the bases of adjoining 
rays), while in others they are small and inconspicuous, and in the most highly 
specialized forms they are completely hidden and indistinguishable ; in Luidia the 
superomarginals appear to be wanting, but the inferomarginals are fairly conspicu- 
ous. In most starfishes which lack paxillae, minute, finger-like papillae project 
between the plates of the dorsal skeleton ; these are probably respiratory organs 
and are known as papulae ; the papulae are often single, but are usually grouped 
in the areas between the skeletal plates, and these are then referred to as papular 
areas. The madreporic plate is usually conspicuous on the dorsal side in an inter- 
bracliial area, but in species having paxillae it is often hard to find. The sides of 
the furrow, on the under side of each ray, in which the tube-feet are located, are 
guarded by a series of plates, each of which carries a row or group of spines ; the 
plates are called the adambulacral plates and the spines make up the adambulacral 
armature. In describing starfishes, it is customary, for brevity's sake, to let R 
stand for the major radius, . e., from the center of til e mouth to the tip of a ray, 




and r stand tor the minor radius, i. e. from the center of the mouth to the middle 
of an interbrachial margin ; in a perfectly circular starfish, we would say, R = r ; 
in an ordinary pentagonal starfish R = r +, while in a starfish with long rays 
R = 6r, more or less. 

Key to the Starfishes of the Peruvian Coast. 

Upper surface covered with paxillae; general form decidedly flattened; 
inferomarginal plates with long spines forming a conspicuous lateral 
fringe along the ray. 

Superomarginal plates conspicuous in contrast to paxillae (Astropecten) . 
Superomarginal plates, each with one or two prominent vertical 


Superomarginal plates at base of ray (but not in interbrachial area) 
with two spinelets each, one on inner edge and one near outer 

margin A. erinaceus 

Superomarginal plates with only a single spinelet each, except that 

a few near tip of ray may carry a second small one . . A. peruvianus 
Superomarginal plates without spinelets ; some of those near base of 

ray may carry, each, a small rounded tubercle A.fragilis 

Superomarginal plates reduced and not readily distinguishable be- 
neath paxillae (Luidia). 
Each paxilla in third longitudinal series at side of ray carries, except 

near tip of ray, a long slender spine L. phragma 

None of the paxillae carry long and slender spines. 

Inferomarginal plates, each with a longitudinal (transverse to long 
axis of ray) series of 4-6 flattened, usually blunt or truncate 
spines; many paxillae have central spinelet enlarged into a blunt 

elevated tubercle or sharp, stout spine L. bellonae 

Inferomarginal plates, each with 2 or 3 long, sharp spines; no 
paxillae (except occasionally some along sides of ray) with large 

central tubercle or spinelet L. Columbia 

Upper surface without paxillae; sides of ray without lateral fringe of 

slender inferomarginal spines. 

Tube-feet in two series in each ambulacrum ; rays normally five. 
Disc large and rays short; form often pentagonal; R never more 

than 2.5r. 
Marginal plates conspicuous, forming a definite boundary to the 

more or less pentagonal body. 
Marginal plates and disc free from large~spines. 

Superomarginal plates 19-20 on each side of each ray (in speci- 
men 75 mm. across), covered by a close pavement of crowded 

granules Tosia verrucosa 

Superomarginal plates 15-16 on side of ray (in specimen 75 mm. 
across), covered by a coat of distinct granules coarser than 

those of disc Odontaster singularis 

Some marginal or disc plates or both, carry large spines Nidorellia armata 



Marginal plates more or less concealed not forming a definite 

boundary to a pentagonal body. 
Large species (R up to 150 mm.) with dorsal surface carrying 

numerous big sharp tubercles or spines or both. 
Dorsal surface elevated, with coarse tubercles, granulated at 

base Oreaster occidentalis 

Dorsal surface flat, with numerous, erect, smooth, very stout 

spines Paulia horrida 

Small species (R seldom exceeds 25 mm.) with dorsal surface, 

entirely free from conspicuous spines or tubercles (Asterina). 

Plates of ventral interbrachial areas with only 1 spine 

each A. calcarata 

Plates of ventral interbrachial areas with 2-6 spines 

each A. chilensis 

Disc small or moderate, R more than 3r and usually more than 4r. 
Rays short and thick, about equal to 3r covered, as is the disc 
by groups of crowded blunt spinelets, simulating low paxillae. 

Parasterina obesa 
Rays longer, 4-1 Or. 

Disc and rays closely covered with a nearly smooth, granulated 
coat, without projecting spines, except beside ambulacral 
Papular areas arranged in a single (rarely double) broad 

series along each side of ray Pkataria unifasclalis 

Papular areas arranged in eight series on each ray. 

Madreporic plate very large, its diameter .25 or more of disc 
diameter ; rays somewhat trigonal ; inner series of adam- 
bulacral armature made up of approximately equal and 

similar spines Pharia pyramidata 

Madreporic plate much smaller ; rays more or less cylindri- 
cal; inner series of adambulacral armature made up of 

alternating large and small spines Ophidiaster ludwigi 

Disc and rays bearing spines or spinelets, sometimes minute and 

Spines and spinelets large, unequal and irregularly scattered, 

blunt, covered to tip with scale-like granules . . Miihrodia bradleyi 
Spines and spinelets bare, often small or even minute. 
Spinelets very minute, in more or less crowded groups on 

dorsal plates Henricia hyadesi 

Spines well developed, arranged singly on dorsal plates (Echinaster). 
Dorsal spines rather crowded, in irregular rows . . . E, cribella 

Dorsal spines irregularly scattered E. cylindricus 

Tube-feet in four, more or less distinct series in each ambulacrum. 
Rays few, never more than eight. 

Rays 5, with about 11 longitudinal, abactinal series of groups of 

closely crowded granule-like spinelets Stichaster aurantiacus 

Rays normally 6, rarely 5 or 7, with 5 longitudinal series of large, 

widely separated, abactinal spines . . .JU . . . Asterias gelatinosa 


Kays numerous, up to forty-three (Heliaster). 

Kays very short, free from each other for only .15-.20 of length 

H. polybrachius 
Rays longer, free from each other .30-.40 of length ....//. helianthus 

Astropecten erinaceus. 

J. E. Gray, 1840. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 6, p. 182. 

Plate 1, figure 1. 

Nothing is said by Gray as to either the size or color of this species. The larg- 
est specimens I have seen have the rays about 85 mm. long, but those taken by 
Coker do not exceed R 75 mm. Most dry specimens are dull yellowish, more 
or less dusky above, while the best preserved specimens in the Coker collection 
are uniformly deep reddish fawn color. But in life the coloration must be much 
handsomer, for Coker' s field notes show that the specimens taken at the mouth of 
the river Tumbes were " dorsally blue, except that the spines which margin the 
lower angles of arms are orange color in their dorsal aspect," while of the speci- 
mens taken at Capon it is said: "Under side white in small specimens, tinted 
orange in larger ones ; bluish at tips of arms ; above deep blue ; the spines orange, 
those margining the arms are bright orange, while the dorsal spines are of a 
duller shade." The change from this bright coloration to the uniform reddish fawn 
color of the preserved specimens is very remarkable, but is of course due to the 
preserving fluids. These specimens were " first preserved in native spirits and 
subsequently transferred to formalin solution" (3-5^, solution in sea- water). 
Such a marked change of color shows how little dependence can be placed on the 
color of preserved specimens not accompanied by field notes. 

This is a Panamic species, ranging from about 25 N. to 3 30' S. lat. It 
was first collected by Cuming at St. Elena on the coast of Ecuador, about 2 
S. lat., on a bottom of sandy mud in six fathoms of water. There are specimens 
in the M. C. Z. collection from Lower California and the Gulf of California. 
Coker took three specimens at the mouth of the river Tumbes and found the spe- 
cies abundant at Capon. Regarding its occurrence at Capon he says: "The 
water here is very quiet, and as the tide recedes most of these starfishes . . . 
slip away in the water, leaving, however, a very distinct impression of the form in 
the mud; so that when the mud-flat is exposed one may see in abundance the 
impressions of these starfishes, but without either the animals or any mark of their 
departure." It is probable that Dr. 'Coker is mistaken in supposing the starfishes 
to have slipped away in the water. Verrill (1901, p. 36) speaks of similar im- 
pressions made by Luidia, and he is satisfied, as he has himself told me, that the 
impression of the starfish in the sand is made over (not under) the starfish, and is 
caused by ciliary currents of water among the paxillae and marginal plates of the 
dorsal surface. If undisturbed, the starfish may by a sudden quick movement be 
captured in situ, but if disturbed by the approach of the collector, the animal 
moves away rapidly beneath the surface of the sand, leaving the impression in the 



sand undisturbed, Such habits indicate unusual activity for an echinoderm and 
deserve detailed and very careful observation and study. 

Astropecten peruvianus. 
A. E. Verrill, 1867. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 275. 

This species is very similar to erinaceus in size and general appearance. Ver- 
rill does not refer to the color and, unfortunately, neither do Coker's field notes. 
The dry specimens are dull yellow above and nearly white beneath, with the madre- 
poric plate orange. Verrill's specimens and Coker's also are from Payta, so there 
is no clue as to the range of the species. Coker took a dozen specimens "with 
boat-beam trawl, southeast of Caleta, Colon, Bay of Payta, 7-8 fms., soft mud, 
April 13," 1907. Though occurring in so much deeper water than erinaceus, 
there is no reason for expecting any difference in the habits of these species. I 
fully agree with Verrill that it is impossible to determine whether Gray's stellatus 
is this species or not. 

Astropecten fragilis. 
A. E. Verrill, 1867. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 272. 

So far as I can learn this species has not been recorded since the original de- 
scription was published. Verrill says nothing of the coloration, but gives the 
following measurements : R - 58 mm., r = 12.5 mm. ; breadth of ray at base, 
15 mm. (the measurements are given by Verrill in inches and tenths). The only 
known specimens are from Panama and Zorritos, Peru. 

Luidia phragma, sp. nov. 1 

Plate 2, figure 1. 

Rays 5. R = 73 mm., r = 12 mm., R = 6r. Interbrachial arcs acute. Rays 
very flat, tapering gradually to a point. Breadth at base, 14 mm. Disc moderate, 
flat ; vertical diameter only about 7 mm. Paxillae of disc and median portion of 
rays small (.5-1 mm. in diameter of tabulae), irregularly circular, becoming 
squarish at sides of rays. Each paxilla has a dozen or more very slender, margi- 
nal spines, above which are half a dozen or more stouter ones, while the center of 
the tabula is occupied by 1-4 short, thick, blunt spinelets. Along eacli side of 
the ray are three longitudinal series of larger paxillae (1-1.25 mm. across), similar 
to the others, but more nearly rectangular. Innermost of these three rows, very 
conspicuous, each paxilla carrying, at center of tabula, a single, slender, sharp 
spine, 2-3 mm. long. These conspicuous spines form a fence or "palisade" 
along each side of ray about three millimeters from inferomarginal edge. 
marginal plates, with similar, though slightly larger spines ; there are two to each 
plate, one above the other ; the marginal fringe is thus very conspicuous. Seen 

1 <t>pdyij.a, a palisade, in reference to the palisade-like series of spines along the 
sides of the rays. - ^ 


from below the iuferomarginal plates are well separated from each other ; they 
have a marginal fringe of slender spinelets like those of the paxillae ; the surface 
of the plate carries half a dozen flat, pointed spines, 1-2 mm. long, with a number 
of other smaller ones. Adambulacral armature of 3-4 spines in a single series, at 
right angles to furrow ; innermost, smallest, sharp and slightly curved ; the next 
is largest, 3 mm. long, straight (or nearly so) and blunt. Oral plates each with 
4-6 spines, clustered at ^), and a similar number of variable size scattered on sur- 
face. Madreporic plate small, lying between the two terminal paxillae of the 
" palisade " series of two adjoining rays. Color (dry) : disc and median area 
of rays pale gray with a yellowish tinge ; paxillae outside of " palisade " series, all 
spines and entire lower surface more or less nearly white ; there are several 
indistinct blotches of a darker gray on upper surface of rays. 

The specimen described above and two others are in the M. C. Z. collection, 
labeled "Chile or Sandwich Islands." As they were presented by Dr. W. H. 
Jones, U. S. N., in April, 1874, and as most of the specimens received from him 
at that time were from Chile and Peru, these Luidias are doubtless from the same 
locality. This probability is rendered almost a certainty by the fact that the 
M. C. Z. collection contains 14 specimens of what appears to be the same species, 
from the Gulf of California, collected by W. J. Fisher. They are dry and in 
mediocre or poor condition, and range in size from K 32 to R = 108 mm. In 
color they are all dirty yellowish, blotched above with blackish. Tew of them have 
the " palisades " as perfectly developed as in the type, but it is evident in every 
specimen, even the smallest. It would seem, then, that phragma is a Panamic 
species, and it is most likely that Dr. Jones's specimens were collected at Payta, 
Peru. No species nearly allied is known from the Hawaiian Islands. 

Luidia bellonae. 
C. F. Ltitken, 1865. Vid. Med. f. 1864, p. 133. 

This species reaches, under favorable conditions, a much larger size than has 
been recorded. Lutken's types were 8 and 12 inches in diameter respectively, 
which would indicate R = 110-160 mm. Meissner (1896) has recorded specimens 
from R = 23.5 to 11= 232 mm., the last being the largest specimen known 
hitherto. But in the M. C. Z. collection there is a specimen from Talcahuano, 
Chile, in which E, = 250 mm. and the rays are 45 mm. wide at base. Clearly, 
then, bellonae is one of the largest starfishes known on the west coast of tropical 
America. The color of dry specimens is like that of many Luidias, gray above, 
deepest along the middle of each ray, and with more or less of a bluish cast, 
and white or cream color beneath. Dr. Coker's notes refer to the color of the 
living animal as simply "gray." This species has a wide distribution, for while 
Lutken's types (one of them, at least) were from Guayaquil, Verrill (1867) 
has recorded the species from Callao ; de Loriol (1891) from Mazatlan, Mexico; 
Meissner (1892) from Callao, and (1896) from Iquique and Talcahuano; and Clark 
(1902) from Albemarle Island, Galapagos. Meissner (1896) expresses the opiu- 



ion that de Loriol's specimens from Mazatlau were not the true bellonae, and 
he therefore names them lorioli. I am not able to agree with this view, for it 
seems that the characters by which he attempts to separate the two forms are 
unreliable, and de Loriol's description and figures appear to agree very well with 
Peruvian specimens. 

Dr. Coker took small specimens (R 100 mm. ) of this species "off north- 
east side of San Lorenzo Island" (which is off Callao) in "about 2 fathoms," 
on February 5, 1907; and also " with dredge and trawl, Bay of Sechura, west of 
Matacaballa; about 5 fathoms in depth, April 8," 1907. The Bay of Seehura is 
just north of Aguja Point. Nothing is recorded of the habits of bellonae. 

Luidia Columbia. 

Petalaster Columbia J. E. Gray, 1840. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 6, p. 183. 

Luida tessellata C. F. Liitken, 1859. Vid. Med. f. 1859, p. 40. 

Petalster columbiae A. E. Verrill, 1867. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 272. 

Luidia colombiae E. Perrier, 1876. Arch. Zool. Exp., 5, p. 253. 

Luidia columbiae W. P. Sladen, 1889. Kept. voy. " Challenger," 30, p. 247.- 

Plate 1, figure 2. 

This is also a very large starfish, for while most of the known specimens have 
R = 100-200 mm., there are much larger specimens in the M. C. Z. collection 
from Magdaleua Bay, Lower California. The largest of these has R= 275 mm., 
and the breadth of the arms at base is 38 mm. The color of preserved specimens 
is yellowish green, brownish green, or dull greenish gray above, and yellowish 
beneath. Dr. Coker's field notes show that in life the animal is " dorsally of a 
mouse color with many dark specks. Below yellowish white." This seems to be 
one of the most common starfishes of the Panamic region, and one that is widely 
distributed. It ranges from Magdaleua Bay, Lower California, and the Gulf of 
California to northern Peru, and has also been reported from the Galapagos Islands. 
Specimens in the Coker collection were taken with L. bellonae in the Bay of Se- 
chura, on April 8, 1907, and with Astropecten erinaceus at Capon, January 29, 
1908. The habits are reported by Coker to be like those of the Astropecteu (q. v.) 
witli which it is found. 

Tosia verrucosa. 

Goniodiscus verrucosus R. A. Philippi, 1857. Arch. f. Naturg., 36, Bd. 1, p. 132. 
Pentagonaster (Astrogonium] verrucosus E. Perrier, 1878. Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. 

Nat., (2) 1, p. 84. 
Gnathaster (?) verrucosus W. P. Sladen, 1889. Rept. voy. "Challenger," 30, p. 750. 

To judge from Philippi's account, this starfish would appear to occur not rarely 
on the coast between Valparaiso and the Rio Maipu, yet strangely enough it does 

1 This is the way the name has been written for many years, but there is no 
reason why Gray's original spelling should not be Detained. 


not seem to have been met with by any other observers. Consequently its real 
relationships are still very doubtful. Philippi gives the diameter as three inches 
and the color red. It is not impossible that the species is based upon specimens 
of the following species, Odontaster singularis, but I have never seen individuals 
of Odontaster answering to Philippi's description. 

Odontaster singularis. 

Goniodiscus singularis J. Muller and F. Troschel, 1843. Arch. f. Naturg., 9, Bd. 1, 

p. 116. 

Pentagonaster singularis E. Perrier, 1876. Arch. Zool. Exp , 5, p. 38. 
Gnathaster singularis W. P. Sladen, 1889. Kept. voy. "Challenger," 30, p. 286. 
Asterodon singularis E. Perrier, 1891. Miss. Sci. Cap Horn. Zool., 3, p. K 134. 
Odontaster singularis F. J. Bell, 1893. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 262. 

Plate 2, figure 4. 

The original specimens of this interesting starfish were from Chile, but later in- 
vestigations have shown that it is a southern species most common on the south 
and west coasts of Patagonia. It reaches a diameter of 75-80 mm. and in life is 
red ; preserved specimens are dull yellowish or brownish. The only claim which 
this species has to a place in the Peruvian fauna is based on Leipoldt's (1895) 
report of a small specimen (less than 30 mm. in diameter) which was taken be- 
tween Iquique and Pisagua, about 20 S. lat. It is hardly likely that the north- 
ern range of Odontaster extends much above the twentieth parallel, so that its 
occurrence in Peruvian waters is improbable. 

Nidorellia armata. 

Pentaceros (Nidorellia) armatus J. E. Gray, 1840. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 6, p. 277. 
Nidorellia armata A. E. Verrill, 1867. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 280. 

Plate 4, figure 2. 

This is a common and well-known member of the Panamic fauna, ranging from 
Guaymas, Mexico, to Zorritos, Peru, and also to the Galapagos Islands. The largest 
specimen seen has 11=: 88 mm. The proportion II : r is quite variable, ranging 
from 1.45 : 1 to 1.75 : 1. The number and arrangement of the abactinal spines 
is exceedingly variable. The color in life is given by Verrill as bright scarlet. 
Preserved specimens are more or less yellowish or brownish, seldom showing any 
trace of red. Although this species has been taken as far south as Zorritos, it is 
not represented in the Coker collection. A specimen in the M. C. Z. collection is 
remarkable for appearing to have seven rays, when seen from above ; but when 
the oral side is examined, it is found that only Jive ambulacral furrows run out 
from the actinostome ; of these, however, two bifurcate, one near the mouth and 
the other near the distal end, and thus arises the appearance of seven rays. 



Oreaster Occident alls. 

A. E. Verrill, 1867. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 278. 

Plate 4, figure 1. 

This species is, like the preceding, a common Panamic form, ranging from the 
Gulf of California southward. The diameter of a large specimen is about 300 
mm. Preserved specimens are yellowish or brownish, but in life the dorsal plates 
are said to be bright crimson, the spaces between greenish brown. Dr. Coker 
did not meet with this species, nor has it yet been recorded from Peru, but Cuming 
collected a young Oreaster at Punta Santa Elena, Ecuador, along with Nido- 
rellia, and as it seems almost certain that Oreasters will be found on the northern 
shores of Peru, I have included the Panamic species in this list. Verrill (1867) 
has given reasons why Gray's Pentaceros cumingii, based on the specimen taken 
by Cuming at St. Elena, cannot be identical with Oreaster occidental, but it 
seems very probable that when our knowledge of the Ecuadorian Oreasters is 
complete cumingii will prove to be the young of occidentalis. 

Paulia horrida. 

J. E. Gray, 1840. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 6, p. 278. 
Plate 3, figure 3. 

The original specimens of this remarkable starfish were taken by Cuming at 
Punta Santa Elena, Ecuador, in 12-18 fathoms, in company with Nidorellia and 
Oreaster. Unlike these latter, however, it has seldom been met with since and 
seems to be rather rare, the only specimens recorded since Cuming's day being 
taken at the Galapagos Islands. Gray's type was about 150 mm. in diameter, 
but the specimens from the Galapagos were smaller. The color of dried speci- 
mens is yellowish brown, but in life it is probable the general coloration is red or 
reddish as in Oreaster and Nidorellia. 

Asterina calcarata. 

Asteriscus calcaratus E. Perrier, 1869. Ann. Sci. Nat., (5) 12, p. 292. 
Asterina calcarata E. Perrier, 1876. Arch. Zool. Exp., 5, p. 222. 

This species is very little known, the original one (30 mm. in diameter) from 
Valparaiso remaining unique, so far, at least, as South American specimens are 
concerned. Under the name calcaratus Valenciennes placed a number of Asteri- 
nas from Chile, and Gay, in his account (1854) of the echiuoderms of that coun- 
try, made no effort to differentiate them. Perrier, however, restricted the name 
to this particular form, supposed to be from Valparaiso. Were it not that a 
variety (selkirki Meissner, 1896) is common at Juan Fernandez, one might 
be doubtful whether Perrier's specimen really came from Chile, especially as 
de Rochebrune (1881) records calcarata from the Cape Verde Islands. For the 


present, however, we may retain the species in the Chilean fauna, with the hope 
that further collecting on the South American coast may settle the doubt con- 
cerning it. 

Asterina chilensis. 

Asteriscus chilensis C. F. Liitken, 1859. Vid. Med. f. 1859, p. 61. 
Asterina chilensis C. F. Lutken, 1871. Vid. Med. f. 1871, p. 302. 

Plate 2, figures 3 and 3. 

This pretty starfish, which may be as much as 50 mm. in diameter, is one of 
the characteristic species of the Chilean fauna, arid has been recorded from many 
places along the coast between Payta, Peru, and Talcahuauo, Chile. In the 
Coker collection there are specimens from La Punta (at Callao), Lobos de 
Afuera Islands (southwest of Aguja Point) and Bay of Sechura (just north of 
Aguja Point), but unfortunately there are no notes on coloration or habits. The 
specimens vary greatly in form, from R= 1.5r to R = 2r and in the spinula- 
tion of both the upper and lower surfaces ; in some specimens the spinules on the 
upper side seem rather long, while in others they are more like granules ; the plates 
of the actinal side carry in some cases only 2 or 3 spines, in others 4-6. 
There is also a striking difference in the color ; one group of specimens are uni- 
formly dull yellowish or pale brown, while another shows very bright colors, min- 
gled blue and red. The latter are from the Bay of Sechura and were at first 
supposed to represent a different species, bnt unfortunately for that view they do 
not agree with each other in proportions and spinulation, nor differ consistently 
in any character but color from the individuals taken south of Aguja Point. It 
seems therefore that chilensis is a variable species, the limits of whose variation 
have still to be determined. 

Parasterina obesa, sp. nov. 1 

Plate 3, figures 1 and 2. 

Rays 5. R = 42 mm., r = 14 mm., R = 3r. Interbrachial arcs rounded. 
Rays very stout, tapering slightly to a blunt point; breadth at base, 13 mm., 
vertical thickness 10 mm. Disc large and flat, its vertical diameter the same as 
that of the rays. Whole surface of disc, interbrachial spaces and rays, above and 
below to the adambulacral series, covered by paxilliform plates very much like 
those in Odontaster singularis, which carry crowded groups of 10-50 blunt, granule- 
like spinelets. Along sides of rays, and especially on under surface and in 
interbrachial areas these plates are in regular longitudinal and diagonal series, but 
dorsally no such regular arrangement is to be seen. Plates in oral interbrachial 
areas, largest and most widely spaced from each other, with 6-12 spinelets each. 
Papulae occur singly or in groups of 2-4, between dorsal plates and along sides 
of rays but not on lower surface. Neither supero- nor infero marginal plates can 

1 obesus, fat, in allusion to the very plump rays. 


be distinguished. Adambulacral armature consists of a marginal series of 3 
(rarely 4) stout, blunt spines (about 1 mm. long) of which adoral is usually 
smallest and aboral largest ; surface of plate with half a dozen (4-7) somewhat 
similar but slightly smaller spines, arranged in pairs or trios. Oral plates small, 
each with a marginal series of four spines, more or less expanded at tip and a 
single blunt spine on surface of plate. Madreporic plate very inconspicuous, less 
than 2 mm. across and only 4-5 mm. from center of disc. Color (dry) uni- 
form, light yellowish brown. 

There are two specimens of this well-characterized species in the M. C. Z. col- 
lection, which were taken at Talcahuano, Chile, by the '* Hassler " expedition. [ 
have been in doubt as to their real relationship, but as they are more nearly allied 
to Sladen's Patina bellula than to any other starfish with which I have compared 
them, I consider them congeneric with that species. Fisher (1908) has shown 
that Patiria is untenable and has proposed Parasterina as a substitute. 

Phataria unifascialis. 

Linckia (Phataria) unifascialis J. E. Gray, 1840. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 6, p. 285. 
Phataria unifascialis W. P. Sladen, 1889. Kept. voy. " Challenger," 30, p. 786. 

Plate 5, figure 1. 

This common and well-known Panamic species, which ranges as far north as 
the Gulf of California, has been recorded by Verrill (1867) from Zorritos, Peru, 
and doubtless occurs on the northern coasts of that country although not met with 
by Coker. But the record from Timor (v. Martens, 1866, p. 85) is probably based 
on an erroneous identification, while de Loriol's (1900) specimen from Celebes 
can scarcely have been collected originally in the East Indies, though it may have 
been taken to Europe from there. Museum specimens of this species are usu- 
ally yellowish or grayish in color, but we have no information as to color in life. 
From the appearance of the best dry specimens, the living animal was probably red 
of some shade. The largest specimens have R = 125 mm. and also = 9r. 

Pharia pyramidata. 

Ophidiaster (Pharia) pyramidatus J. E. Gray, 1840. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 6, 

p. 284. 
Pharia pyramidata W. P. Sladen, 1889. Kept. voy. " Challenger," 30, p. 784. 

Plate 5, figure 2. 

Like the preceding, this is a common Panamic species, known to range from 
the Gulf of California to Zorritos, Peru, but not met with by Coker. Leipoldt 
(1895) records two specimens from Valparaiso, but there is little reason to doubt 
that, if the specimens are correctly labeled, they were brought to that city 
from the north. Large specimens of Pharia have R = 150-160 mm. and also 
= 5.3-7,5r. The color of preserved specimens is dull purplish or reddish brown, 
often more or less yellowish along the ambulacral furrows. Verrill (1867 p. 288) 


says that the color is " in life, variegated above with purple and brown," but else- 
where (1871, p. 577) he says, "the dry specimens in best condition are light 
straw color beneath ; the poriferous zones are bright orange ; the rows of large 
plates on the back and sides olive-green ; madreporic plate, large, dark olive-green. 5 ' 

Ophidiaster ludwigi. 
P. de Loriol, 1900. Revue Suisse Zool., 8, p. 78. 

This species is based upon a single specimen in de Loriol's collection, labeled 
simply " Perou." E. = 40 mm., r = 9 mm. Kays, 11 mm. broad and 8 mm. 
high at base. Color brownish violet ; papular areas lighter ; ventral side, pale 
yellowish. While at least one species of Ophidiaster may 'occur in the warmer 
coastal waters of Peru, it should be remembered that many animals, described in 
Europe as from Peru, were really from the island of Peru in the Gilbert group, 
and it is quite possible therefore that de Loriol's Ophidiaster is not from South 

Mithrodia bradleyi. 

A. E. Verrill, 1867. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 288. 
Plate 6, figure 1. 

Although this species was not met with by Dr. Coker and has never been re- 
corded from Soutli America, I include it for two reasons, neither of which alone 
would warrant such a course. In the first place, it is a Panamic species with the 
same general distribution as Pharia, Phataria, and others, and therefore will prob- 
ably be found near Zorritos. In the second place, there is a single dry specimen 
in the M. C. Z. collection, received in 1862 from the Academy of Natural Sciences 
of Philadelphia, labeled simply " Arica, Peru." This specimen is of interest 
because, while it is quite unlike specimens of bradleyi from the Gulf of Cali- 
fornia, it resembles very closely in its general appearance, though not in pro- 
portions, the "peculiar specimen" from the Hawaiian Islands, described and 
figured by Fisher (1906, p. 1096, pi. 37, figs. 2-3). In the Peruvian specimen, 
R = 135 mm., r = 15 mm., E. = 9r and the color is light brown ; other dry 
specimens are nearly black. Fisher (1906) says the rays are usually unequal, and 
in his largest Hawaiian specimen, R varied from 198' to 230 mm. In life, the 
color is more or less vermilion red, light or dark or both. 

Henricia hyadesi. 

Cribrdla hyadesi E. Perrier, 1891. Miss. Sci. Cap Horn : Zool. 3, p. K100. 
Plate 2, figure 5. 

This is a species of the far south, which is admitted here on the strength of Meiss- 
ner's (1896) identification of a number of specimens from Iquique, which is very 
near the Chile-Peruvian line. It is a small species ; in the largest known speci- 




mens, R = 41 mm. The color in life is recorded as "ziegelroth oder gelbroth." 
There is no longer any justification for the use of the name Cribrella, but the name 
hyadesi does not seem to have been used hitherto in combination with the proper 
generic name, Henricia. 

Echinaster cribella. 
C. F. Liitken, 1871. Vid. Med. f. 1871, p. 288. 

This is another of those unsatisfactory species which has not been met with 
since it was described. The type was not quite 74 mm. in diameter; nothing 
is said as to its color. It was supposed to have come from Valparaiso. As Echi- 
naster is a genus characteristic of warm seas, it is quite probable that it occurs on 
the northern coasts of Peru, but it is hardly to be expected as far south as Val- 
paraiso ; yet its distribution may be similar to that of Asterina chilensis. 

Echinaster cylindricus. 
M. Meissner, 1892. Arch. f. Naturg., 58, bd. 1, p. 184. 

This species is based on a single specimen, said to have been taken at Callao, 
Peru. In this specimen R = 80-90 mm. and also = 7-^r. The color is recorded 
as "dark blackish brown." 

Stichaster aurantiacus. 

Asterias aurantiacus F. J. F. Meyen, 1834. Reise um die Erde, 1, p. 222. 
Stichaiter aurantiacus A. E. Verrill, 1867. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 293. 

Plate 8, figure 1. 

This is one of the characteristic starfishes of the Chilean region. It reaches a 
large size for a Stichaster, full-grown specimens having R = 120 mm. The color 
in life is orange or red, but preserved specimens are dull yellowish or pale brown. 
Specimens have been taken as far north as Callao and as far south as Talcahuano. 
Dr. Coker met with this species on the rocky shores of the Pescadores Islands 
and at North Chinca Island. Of the former his notes say, "Abundant; red; 
brittle," and of the latter, " On rocky shores ; color red ; easily broken ; abundant." 

Asterias gelatinosa. 

F. J. F. Meyen, 1834. Reise um die Erde, 1, p. 222. 
Plate 6, figure 9. 

Although this species has not yet been recorded from north of Iquique, there 
is good reason to believe it will be found in suitable localities along the southern 
coast of Peru. It grows to a large size, full-grown specimens having R = 250 
mm. and breadth of ray = 50 mm. According to Meyen's original description, 
the upper surface is milky white, with the spines and tubercles bright orange. 
Preserved specimens give no hint of such coloration, as they are dull brown or 
various shades. 


Heliaster polybrachius. 

H. L. Clark, 1907. Bull. M. C. Z., 51, p. 54. 

Plate 7, figure 1. 

This interesting starfish is remarkable for its very limited range, as it is known 
only from Zorritos, Payta, and the Lobos de Afuera Islands. The number of rays 
ranges from 31 to 43 and averages rather more than 37. The largest specimen 
seen is about 180 mm. across. Nothing is recorded of the color in life, but pre- 
served specimens are dull greenish or blackish above, often marked with yellowish 
blotches ; rarely the yellowish predominates ; spines and actinal surface yellowish. 
Two specimens in the Coker collection were taken on the shore rocks of Lobos 
de Afuera, March 27, 1907. 

Heliaster helianthus. 

Asterias hdianthus J. B. P. Lamarck, 1816. Anim. s. Vert., 2, p. 558. 

Asterias (Heliaster} helianthus J. E. Gray, 1840. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist,, 6, p. 179. 

Heliaster helianthus F. Dujardin et Hupe, 1862. Hist. Nat. Zooph. Ech., p. 344. 

Plate 7, figure 2. 

Meyen (1834) speaks of this as the " ausgezeiclmetesten " species of starfish 
and it certainly must always rank as one of the most notable species, because of its 
large size (300 mm. in diameter) and numerous rays (30-40). It ranges from^ 
northern Ecuador (about 2 N. lat.) to Valparaiso, and seems to be very com- 
mon, as it has been recorded by all collectors on that coast. Dr. Coker took speci- 
mens at the Lobos de Afuera Islands, on the northeast side of San Lorenzo Island, 
at the Pescadores Islands, and at Independencia Bay, south of Pisco. Of the 
last, he says in his field notes, " white below ; above black with spines red." So 
far as I can discover this is the only observation on the color of a living Heliaster 
which has ever been recorded, and it shows that the dull shades (blackish and 
yellowish) of preserved specimens give no clue to the fine coloration of the living 

Brittle-Stars. Ophiuroidea. 

The brittle-stars comprise an astonishingly small part of the Peruvian 
fauna, especially when it is remembered that not less than thirty species 
occur at Panama, most of which might reasonably be expected to occur 
as far south as Payta. While lack of attractive reefs and bottoms may 
account for the absence of some species, it is probable that more inten- 
sive collecting will increase the number considerably. The ten species 
herein recorded represent seven genera, none of which is characteristic of 
the region ; all but one or two are cosmopolitan. Yet, strangely enough, 
five of the species ar not known outside of the Chile-Peruvian region, 


while four of the remaining five are Panamic. The origin of the ophiu- 
ran fauna is unquestionably Panamic; indeed, there is not a single 
species which seems to have come into the Peruvian fauna from the 
south, unless Amphiodia chilensis is a possible exception. 

In referring to the external features of a brittle-star it is customary to speak of 
the body as the disc, and the rays as arms. On the sides of the arms, in parallel 
vertical series, are borne the more or less conspicuous arm-spinet. On the upper 
surface of the disc lie the radial shields, a pair of plates at the base of each arm ; 
they are sometimes covered by granules or small scales and so appear to be 
wanting. Ac the center of the lower surface of the disc is the mouth, made up of 
five radial slits meeting at a common center ; between each pair of slits is a trian- 
gular or wedge-shaped interradial jaw, along the margins of which are the mouth- 
papillae ; these papillae show great diversity in size, form, and position, and are of 
particular importance in classification ; in Ophiothrix and ome other genera they 
are quite wanting. 

Key to the Brittle-Stars of the Peruvian Coast. 

Arms simple and unbranched. 
Disc closely covered with a fine granulation ; arm-spines short and 

appressed Ophioderma panamense 

Disc not granulated but covered with more or less distinct scales ; arm- 
spines not appressed. 

Disc-scales smooth and free from spines and spinelets. 
Lower surface of disc (between arms) covered with scales ; 3 mouth- 
papillae on each side of jaw. 

Outermost mouth-papilla very wide, equalling or exceeding the two 
inner ones taken together ; size small, disc 2-3 mm. in diam- 
eter ; arm-spines more or less pointed. 

Disc-scales indistinct even when dry, appearing as though 
covered by a thin skin ; arm-spines wide and very flat ; no 
white spot at outer end of radial shield . . Amphipholis laevidisca 
Disc-scales very distinct ; arm-spines slender and sharp ; radial 

shields more or less white at outer end . . . Amphipholis pugetana 
Outermost mouth-papilla not conspicuously wider than the others ; 
size large, disc 5-12 mm. in diameter ; arm-spines stout and 
very blunt. 

Radial shields large, their length more than one-third radius 
of disc ; disc-scales coarse, fewer than 10 radial series in 
each interradial area above and only 100-200 scales in 

each interbnichial space below Amphiodia grisea 

Radial shields small, their length about one-fourth of radius 
of disc ; disc-scales small, about 15 radial series in each 
interradial area and 500-1000 scales in each interbrachial 
space below ? . . Amphiodia chilensis 

J* : 'i 


Lower surface of disc naked ; jaws narrow with only two papillae 
on each side, a squarish one at apex and a small one at outer cor- 
ner ; 3 slender, sharp arm-spines Hemipholis gracilis 

Disc-scales with more or fewer spines or spinelets, at least near margin. 
Disc with only a few spinelets, and these short, smooth, and chiefly 

near margin of disc ; radial shields small Ophiactis kroyeri 

Disc covered with thorny spines or stumps or both ; radial shields 
very large. 
Disc with long slender spines and few or no thorny stumps 

Ophiothrix magnified 
Disc with numerous thorny stumps, often with spines also 

Ophiothrix spiculata 
Arms dichotomously branched Gorgonocephalus panamensis 

Ophioderma panamense. 

C. F. Lutken, 1859. Add. ad. Hist. Oph., pt. 2, p. 91. 
Plate 8, figure 2. 

Although this species has not been recorded from Peru, it is a common Panamic 
species, and it is not strange therefore that the " Hassler " expedition should have 
found it at Payta. There is a single specimen from that locality in the M. C. Z. 
collection. Adult specimens are as much as 25 mm. across the disc, with arms 
110-115 mm. long. The color is "greenish gray or brownish, sometimes with a 
central light spot ; arms similar in color, banded with lighter and darker. Lower 
surface grayish or greenish white" (Verrill). 

Amphipholis laevidisca. 
H. L. Clark, 1909. Mem. Aust. Mus., 4, p. 541. 

This species was taken by the " Hassler " at Talcahuano and has not been met 
with since. It closely resembles A. squamata and was originally recorded as that 
species, but seems to be quite distinct. The small size and plain colors render 
these little brittle-stars so inconspicuous they are ordinarily overlooked. The type 
is about three millimeters across the disc and has lost whatever color markings it 
may have had ; there is no indication that the outer ends of the radial shields were 

ever lighter colored than the disc itself. 


Amphipholis pugetana. 

Amphiura Pugetana T. Lyman, 1868. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 7, p. 193. 
Amphipholis pugetana A. E. Verrill, 1899. Trans. Conn. Acad., 10, p. 312. 

Plate 9, figure 2. 

It is only after much hesitation that I have referred to this species, five small 
specimens, dredged by Dr. Coker in 2 fathoms off the northeast side of San Lo- 
renzo Island, near Callao, on February 5, 1907. They are certainly Amphipholis, 


and they are not A. laevidisca, but they are not well enough preserved to make it 
clear whether they are squamata or pugetana. It seems better, for the present, to 
consider them the latter. 

Amphiodia grisea. 

Amphipholis grisea A. Ljungman, 1867. Ofv. Kongl. Vet.-Akad. Forh., 23, p. 313. 
Amphiodia grisea A. E. Verrill, 1899. Trans. Conn. Acad., 10, p. 313. 

No one has met with this species since its original description, which was based 
on a specimen from Guayaquil, Ecuador. It will probably be found on the north- 
era coast of Peru. The type has the disc 7.3 mm. across and arms 35 mm. long. 

Amphiodia chilensis. 

Ophiolepis chilensis J. Miiller and F. Troschel, 1843. Arch. f. Naturg., 9, bd. 1, 

p. 120. 
Amphiodia chilensis A. E. Verrill, 1899. Trans. Conn. Acad., 10, p. 313. 

Plate 9, figure 1. 

Originally described as from " Chili," this species has since been taken at Tal- 
calmano by the " Hassler " expedition and at Calbuco by Plate. It is probably a 
southern species and its occurrence on the coast of Peru is doubtful. The adult 

has the disc 10-12 mm. across, and arms 70-100 mm. long. 

Hemipholis gracilis. 
A. E. Verrill, 1867. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 262. 

This is a Pauamic species, of which Ljungman had a specimen from Guayaquil ; 
otherwise it is not known from south of Panama. Ljungman (1867) described 
his specimen as Hemipholis affinis^ but Verrill's name has about two months' pri- 
ority and has been generally accepted. In adult specimens the disc is 5-6 mm. 
across, and the arms 10-50 mm. long. The color is given by Verrill as light 
greenish gray (in alcohol), the arms banded with whitish ; radial shields green ; 
beneath white. 

Ophiactis kroyeri. 

C. F. Lutken, 1856. Vid. Med. f. 1856, p. 24. 

Plate 9, figure 3. 

This is the one well-defined, characteristic brittle-star of the Chile-Peruvian 
region. It has, however, been recorded from the Hawaiian Islands, and if its oc- 
currence there is confirmed, its distribution is very remarkable, for unlike the star- 
fish, Mithrodia bradleyi, which also occurs in the Hawaiian group, this Ophiactis 
is not otherwise known from north of the equator. On the South American coast 
between Payta, Peru, and Talcahuano, Chile, kroyeri appears to be very common. 
It is a small species, adults being about 6 mm. across the disc, with arms 18-20 mm. 
long, and the color is inconspicuous, reddish or purplish brown. Dr. Coker 


found this species off the northeast side of San Lorenzo Island, near Callao ; in 
Ancon Bay, on a muddy bottom, 9 fathoms, and also among shells and sea-weed ; 
and in the Bay of Sechura in 5 fathoms. There are no notes in regard to appear- 
ance or habits. 

Ophiothrix magnifica. 

T. Lyman, 1868. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 7, p. 254. 
Plate 9, figure 4. 

This handsome brittle-star is known only from the coast of Peru, between Payta 
and Callao, arid from the Galapagos Islands. It grows to a fairly large size, the 
disc 10-15 mm. in diameter, the arms 50-75 mm. long. Like most species of the 
genus the color is more or less variable ; in preserved specimens it varies from 
light gray to dark blue ; the radial shields may be mottled with very dark and 
very light shades, almost black and white, or the inner half of the shield may be 
dark and the outer half white ; in some specimens a longitudinal white stripe on 
the upper surface of the arm is faintly indicated. Dr. Coker met with this species 
only in the Bay of Sechura. From a comparison of many specimens of magnifica 
collected at Payta, with a still larger series of the following species (spiculata) 
from a number of localities, I have reached the conclusion that the two forms 
intergrade so completely that they are probably identical. As such a question can 
much better be decided from fresh or living material, it has seemed best to keep 
the two forms separate. 

Ophiothrix spiculata. 
J. Le Conte, 1851. Proc. Philadelphia Acad. Nat. Sci., 5, p. 318. 

This is a common and wide-spread Panamic species, somewhat smaller than the 
preceding and more variable in color. Dr. Coker took it in the Bay of Sechura 
and near Capon, and it has also been taken at Payta and Zorritos. The specimens 
in the Coker collection from Capon were found living in a sponge, but nothing 
else is noted as to habits. 

Gorgonocephalus panamensis, 

Astrophyton panamense A. E. Verrill, 1867. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 251. 
Gorgonocephalus panamensit T. Lyman, 1882. Kept. voy. " Challenger," 5, p. 264. 

According to Verrill (1. c.), this species ranges from La Paz, Mexico, to Zorri- 
tos, Peru, but it was not met with by Dr. Coker. The size of an adult is, disc 
35 mm. in diameter, arms 140-150 mm. long. The color of dried specimens is 
yellowish brown. 

Sea-Urchins. Bchinoidea. 

The sea-urchins rank next to the star-fishes both in number of species 
found on the Peruvian ceast and in number of species characteristic of 


the region. Several species reach a large size, and at least one (Strongy- 
locentrotus albus) is of considerable importance as an article of food. Of 
the twelve species, five are characteristic of the region, though one of these 
has been taken at the Galapagos Islands. Six of the remaining species are 
Panamic forms, while the seventh is characteristic of the southeastern 
Pacific Islands and its occurrence on the American coast is exceedingly 
doubtful. The twelve species represent nine genera, six of which occur 
in the West Indian region, two are characteristically Pacific, and one 
(Tetrapygus) is peculiar to the Peruvian region. With the exception of 
Strongylocentrotus albus, which probably has come up the coast from the 
south, all of the species have doubtless come from the north, and it is 
interesting that no fewer than four of them have differentiated into well- 
characterized forms. 

The shell, or more properly test, of a sea-urchin to be well examined should 
be dry, and partly or wholly cleaned from the spines which cover it. It is made 
up of vertical columns of plates ; in all living species there are twenty of these 
columns, and in most sea-urchins the plates are so firmly united with each other 
that the test is hard and unyielding. At the upper end of each pair of columns there 
is a single plate, and these ten plates form in the " regular echini " a ring around 
the periproct, the field in which lies the anus, while in " irregular echini " they 
form a solid group, the periproct lying outside of them, usually on the lower sur- 
face of the test. When the periproct lies outside of them, they form the abactinal 
system, but when the periproct is within, it is also included in the term " abactinal 
system." Examination of the columns of plates which make up the test will 
show that these columns are not only arranged in ten pairs, but that the plates 
of alternate pairs are perforated for the passage of tube-feet; there are thus five 
double columns of perforated plates (i. e. with tube-feet) called the ambulacra, 
and alternating with them five double columns of unperforated plates, the inter- 
ambulacra. The perforations in the ambulacral plates are in pairs and these 
pore-pairs may be arranged in a vertical series on each side of an ambulacrum. 
Often however they are arranged in oblique arcs of three or more in each plate. 
In the abactinal system the five plates at the upper ends of the ambulacra are 
called oculars and the five at the ends of the interambulacra, genitals. Usually the 
genitals being larger than the oculars are readily distinguishable by their size, and 
in the great majority of sea-urchins three or more oculars lie outside the genitals 
(i. e. away from the anus). But the exact arrangement of the plates of the abac- 
tinal system shows great diversity in different families and genera. One of the 
genitals, usually easily distinguished by its larger size, is perforated with nu- 
merous small pores. This genital is known as the madreporic plate. The ambu- 
lacrum at the left side of the madreporic plate is considered anterior, i. e. it marks 
the anterior end of the animal. The test itself is more or less fully covered with 


spines, which are often borne on the abactinal system too ; when the spines are 
large and conspicuous, they are called primaries ; smaller ones are called secon- 
daries; the smallest are miliaries. In some flattened Echini the ambulacra on the 
upper surface are laterally expanded in a conspicuous manner, and from their fan- 
cied resemblance to a flower, each is called a petal. On the flat, lower surface of 
some species the ambulacra are indicated by furrows radiating from the mouth, 
but the pores are exceedingly small and difficult to see. The furrows divide 
on leaving the mouth and diverge steadily until near the margin of the test, when 
they abruptly converge and disappear without meeting. These ambulacral fur- 
rows are concealed by the spines and in most specimens can only be followed 
on the bare test. 

Key to the Sea-Urchins of the Peruvian Coast. 

Anus vertically opposite mouth, which is at center of lower surface and 

provided with jaws and teeth. 
Periproct covered by 4 (rarely 5 or even more) approximately equal 

Color black or deep purple ; numerous secondary spines present 

Tetrapygus niger 

General coloration reddish brown ; no secondary spines. 

Plates of abactinal system and adjoining bare interambulacral 

areas, so finely granular as to have an almost velvety appearance, 

prettily marked with deep red in contrast to gray or whitish 

ground color ; usually no ocular plate (sometimes one) reaches 

periproct Arbacia stellata 

Plates of abactinal system and adjoining bare interambulacral areas, 
coarsely granular, not marked with deep red ; one, two, or three 

ocular plates reach the periproct Arbacia spatuligera 

Periproct covered by many small unequal plates. 
Test (except the flattened lower side) covered by short, very stout, 
truncate spines, forming a close, smooth pavement over the 

whole Podophora pedifera 

Test almost completely covered by unequal, more or less elongated 

and pointed spines. 
Test longer than wide, though often only slightly so ; color, dark 

purplish'or deep reddish brown Echinometra van brunti 

Test with circular outline ; color, more or less greenish. 
Ambulacra with 4 (rarely 5 or 6) pairs of pores in each 

arc Strongylocentrotus gibbosvs 

Ambulacra with 8-10 pairs of pores in each arc 

Strongylocentrotus albus 
Anus not vertically opposite mouth, the line connecting them being 

approximately horizontal. 

Test very flat with a deep notch in the margin of each ambula- 
crum, or a broad slit (lunule) formed by the closing of this notch at 


its outer end ; a lunule also in posterior interambulacrum ; mouth 
with jaws and teeth. 

Size large, 100 mm. and upwards in length ; brown or gray 
with a purplish tinge ; width of area enclosed between two 
branches of an ambulacral furrow on lower surface, where 

widest, .40 or more of its length Encope micropora 

Size small, rarely exceeding 60 mm. in length. 

Anus only 5-6 mm. back of mouth ; color deep green Mellita pacijica 
Anus 9-10 mm. back of mouth ; color not green . . Mellita stokesii 
Test not flat, without lunules or notches ; no jaws or teeth. 

Size large, up to 70 mm. ; test somewhat flattened ; some con- 
spicuous primary spines (or tubercles) on upper surface; 
anterior petals hardly as long as posterior, each containing a 

somewhat triangular area Lovenia cordiformis 

Size small, rarely exceeding 25 mm. in length ; test about as high 
as wide ; no conspicuous primaries ; anterior petals narrow, 
more than twice as long as posterior pair. . . . Agassizia scrobiculata 

Tetrapygus niger. 

Echinus niger G. I. Molina, 1782. Saggio St. Nat. Chili, p. 175. 

Echinocidaris (Tetrapyyus) niyra L. Agassiz et E. Desor, 1846. Ann. Sci. Nat., 6. 

p. 354. 

Arbacia nigra A. Agassiz, 1863. Bull. M. C. Z., 1, p. 20. 
Tetrapygus niger A. Agassiz and H. L. Clark, 1908. Mem. M. C. Z., 34, p. 73. 

Plate 10, figure 1. 

This is one of the characteristic sea-urchins of the west coast of South America, 
and may be easily recognized by the very dark color and nearly hemispherical 
test. It reaches a large size, full-grown specimens being 75 mm. or even more in 
diameter. It ranges from Payta, Peru, to southern Chile. Dr. Coker met with 
this species at La Punta, near Callao ; on rocks between tide-lines, Feriol Bay 
near Chimbote ; on the rocky shores of the Pescadores Islands, where it was abun- 
dant ; and at Independencia Bay, south of Pisco, on the rocky shores of Isla Vieja. 
Of the last, Dr. Coker's notes say: "Black, sometimes with a tinge of violet. 
Local name ' Gallinazos ' or ' Erizos Gallinazos.' ' Gallinazo ' is the turkey-buzzard, 
but the name is also generally applied to the black sea-urchin." 

Arbacia stellata. .>s' t 

Echinus stellatus H. D. de Blainville, 1825. Diet. Sci. Nat., 37, p. 76. 
Arbacia stellata J. E. Gray, 1835. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 38. 

According to Verrill (1867), this common Panamic species occurs at Payta and 
Zorritos, Peru, but it was not met with by Dr. Coker. Large specimens may be 
60 mm. in diameter, but most individuals are considerably smaller. 


Arbacia spatuligera. 

Echinus (Agarites) spatuliger A. Valenciennes, 1846. Voy. Venus Zoophytes, pi. 5, 

fig. 2. 
Arbacia spatuligera A. Agassiz, 1872. Rev. Ech., pt. 1, p. 93. 

Plate 10, figure 2. 

This characteristic species ranges from Guayaquil to southern Chile. Although 
not so large as Tetrapygus niger, its spines are so much longer (40-45 mm.) that 
adults (65-70 mm. in diameter) cover a greater area and look fully as large. 
Dr. Coker met with spatuligera at San Lorenzo Island near Callao, and in the Bay 
of Sechura, about half way between Bayovar and Matacabella, in 5-6 fathoms. 
There are no notes to show the character of the bottom or the appearance or hab- 
its of the living animal. 

Podophora pedifera. 

Echinus pedifer H. D. de Blainville, 1825. Diet. Sci. Nat., 37, p. 97. 
Podophora pedifera L. Agassiz et E. Desor, 1846. Ann. Sci. Nat., 6, p. 374. 

Plate 11, figure 2. 

This remarkable sea-urchin has long been known from the southern Pacific 
islands and was found common in the Paumotus by the "Albatross " in 1899- 
1900, " on the 8eaface of the reef, exposed to the full force of the surf " (A. Agas- 
siz, 1908). Although there are specimens in the M. C. Z. collection labeled 
" Peru," " Chile," " Callao," and " Valparaiso," no recent collectors have met 
with Podophora on the American coast and it is highly improbable that it occurs 
there. Yet it has seemed well to include and figure it, in the hope that some 
Peruvian or Chilean cpllector may verify its occurrence or prove its absence. 

Echinometra van brunti. 

A. Agassiz, 1863. Bull. M. C. Z., 1, p. 21. 

Plate 11, figure 1. 

This well-known Panamic species has been reported from Zorritos, Peru, by 
Verrill (1867), but it was not met with by Dr. Coker. Large specimens may be 
75-80 mm. long, with the breadth rather more than nine-tenths as much. 

Strongylocentrotus gibbosus. 

Echinus (Toxopneustes) gibbosus L. Agassiz et E. Desor, 1846. Ann. Sci. Nat., 6, 

p. 367. 
Strong ylocentrotus gibbosus A. Agassiz, 1872. Rev. Ech., pt. 1, p. 164. 

Plate 13, figure 8. 

Among the sea-urchins of South America this species offers the most interesting 
subjects for investigation owing to the fact that in the very great majority of 
specimens (in museums at least) the test, and especially the abactinal system, is 


more or less distorted by the presence of a parasitic crab (Fabia chilensis Dana). 
In specimens of gibbosus, less than ten millimeters in diameter, there is no evi- 
dence of the presence of the crab ; the test is symmetrical and all of the ocular 
plates are excluded (by the large genitals) from the periproct. In larger speci- 
mens, however, the abactinal system shows the effect of the parasite, and in adults 
the whole periproct and the ring of genital and ocular plates are more or less 
profoundly modified. The number of ocular plates in contact with the periproct 
ranges, in adults, from one to five, but as a rule the anterior ocular and the two 
of the left side are in contact, while the two on the right side are exsert. Very 
rarely one sees an adult gibbosus which appears to be free from the parasite, but 
even in such specimens it is the left side which has the insert oculars. Among 
the many questions which arise in connection with this interesting case of sym- 
biosis, are these : Is this symbiosis, with some mutual advantage, or is it pure 
parasitism ? Is it only the urchins in shallow water, near shore, or also individ- 
uals in deep water, which are attacked by the crab? At what stage of its own 
development does the crab enter the urchin ? How does it enter and how does it 
avoid being cast off ? Does the presence of the crab cause the ultimate death of 
its host ? Does the crab leave a dead host or does it die too ? How does the 
crab distinguish gibbosus from S. albus and other Echini ? 

The adult gibbosus may be 60 mm. in diameter, but the great majority of spec- 
imens seen are under 50. The green coloration is often modified by red (or red- 
dish brown) tips on the spines. This species seems to be most common in the 
region between Payta and Callao, but there is a small specimen in the M. C. Z. 
collection labeled " Valparaiso," and it is probable that the range extends from 
the Gulf of Guayaquil southwards at least along the shores of northern Chile. 
Dr. Coker took specimens " with short spines of olive-green color, off northeast 
side of San Lorenzo Island, in about 2 fathoms " ; others " from the rocks be- 
tween tide-lines, northeast end of Ferrol Bay, Chimbote, March 1," 1907, where 
they were " abundant " and had the " spines olive-green, reddish at tips " ; 
others, " olive-green," were " collected from the rocks in two feet of water (at half 
tide), at Lobos de Afuera, ... on the bay called ' Independencia.' " 

Meissner (1896) makes the rather surprising error of recording this species from 
Iquique as Strongylocentrotus albus ; he says all the specimens were more or less 
deformed by the presence of the crab ; the field note quoted calls them " rother 
seeigel." If it were not for the very full synonymy given, one might regard the 
error as a slip of the pen ; as it is, it is difficult to explain. 

Strongylocentrotus albus. 

Echinus albus G. I. Molina, 1782. Saggio St. Nat. Chili, p. 175. 
Strongylocentrotus albus A. Agassiz, 1872. Rev. Ech., pt. 1, p. 162. 

, Plate 12, figure 1. 

This is the largest of the sea-urchins of the west coast of South America, and 
of special interest because it is the only echinoderm of that region which serves 


as food for man. Large specimens may be as much as 120 mm. in diameter. 
The color is more or less uniformly green, though the tips of the spines may be 
reddish, or, in young specimens, quite red. The range of albus is from Callao to 
the southern part of Chile. Dr. Coker met with this species at Mollendo, where 
he says it is " valued as food," and on the rocky shores of Isla Vieja, Indepen- 
dencia Bay, south of Pisco ; of these latter he says : " The spines are green ; 
those on the lower part of the sides are reddish ; the corona appearing between 
the spines, deep red or reddish chestnut. These are the edible ' erizos ' which 
are so highly esteemed. This form does not seem to be common north of Inde- 
pendencia. (The forms common at Callao are rarely eaten.)" 

Encope micropora. 

L. Agassiz, 1841. Mon. Scut., p. 50. 

Plate 13, figure 1. 

This is a Panamic species ranging from the Gulf of California (Guaymas) to 
the Galapagos Islands and Peru. It reaches a large size, individuals occasionally 
exceeding 150 mm. in length. The color is variable, ranging from brown to gray. 
Dr. Coker took a number of specimens of this Encope " with dredge and trawl 
Bay of Sechura west of Matacaballa ; about 5 fathoms in depth. April 8," 
1907. These specimens are all more or less rubbed, and are of a light purplish 
gray color. 

Mellita pacifica. 
A. E. Verrill, 1867. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 313. 

The type specimen of this interesting form was from Zorritos, Peru, and the 
species has not been taken elsewhere. The type measured about 55 mm. in 
length and was a trifle broader. The color of the dried specimen was deep green, 
but it is quite possible that in life it was red-brown, for the red-brown shades of 
clypeastroids have the remarkable property of becoming green, especially after 

Mellita stokesii. 

Encope stokesii L. Agassiz, 1841. Mon. Scut., p. 59. 
Mellita stokesii A. Agassiz, 1872. Rev. Ech., pt 1, p. 141. 

Plate 13, figure 3. 

Were it not for the differences shown by the internal structure of the test, I 
should have no doubt that this is simply the young of Encope micropora, but 
those differences are so striking it is hard to believe they are due to age only. 
The smallest Encope before me is so much larger than the largest stokesii that a 
fair comparison is not possible and the true relationship of the two forms must 
remain undetermined. The distribution of stokesii is not merely throughout the 


Panamic region but extends to the Galapagos Islands. Dr. Coker met with it 
only in a tide pond at La Boca Grande, Tumbes. These specimens are gray, 
with an evident purple tinge, and show no trace of the " greenish brown " or 
" olive " color, to which Verrill (1867) and A. Agassiz (1873) refer. The largest 
specimen is 63 mm. across, the width slightly exceeding the length. 

Lovenia cordiformis. 

A. Agassiz, 1872. Bull. M. C. Z., 3, p. 67. 

Plate 13, figure 3. 

This is a Panamic species recorded from Guayaquil by Liitken, and although 
not met with by Dr. Coker it probably occurs on the northern coast of Peru. 
It is light brown in color, judging from dry specimens, with a decidedly rosy 
tinge above, especially on the long spines, and yellowish underneath. The test is 
markedly longer than wide and wider than high ; about 50 X 36 X 21 mm. in 
a fully grown individual. 

Agassizia scrobiculata. 

A. Valenciennes, 1846. Voy. Venus Zoophytes, pi. 1, fig. 2. 
Plate 13, figure 4. 

Originally described from Peru, this curious little sea-urchin has since been 
found throughout the Panamic region. Verrill (1871) gives the measurements 
of a large specimen as follows : length, 43 mm. ; width, 40 mm. ; height, 31 mm. 
The color of preserved specimens is light brown or yellowish gray. Dr. Coker 
met with this species at Capon, and states that it is common on the mud-flats, 
where it is known by the local name " Chimpanzas." 

Sea-Cucumbers. Holothurioidea. 

The holothurians are the least known, and appear to be the least 
common, of the classes of echinoderms on the Peruvian coast. Al- 
though seven species are given in the following list, one is known only 
from the original description of a specimen labeled " Peru," a second is 
very unsatisfactorily known from a specimen labeled " Chile " but 
belonging to a warm-water genus, a third is known from Mexico and 
from Patagonia and hence is assumed to occur in Peruvian waters, and 
a fourth is a Panamic species, hitherto very little known. Of the 
remaining thrtee, two are southern species, which only reach the lower 
coast of Peru. Consequently there remains only a single common and 
well-distributed holothurian on the Peruvian coast. In view of these 
facts it is futile to discuss the origin of the holothurian fauna. It is 
only necessary to add that the nearest relative of the common Phyllo- 
phorus of Peru is apparently some one of the Australasian species. 



The more or less elongate body of a holothurian terminates anteriorly in a 
circle of tentacles surrounding the mouth, but these are very sensitive and highly 
contractile organs and when the animal is alarmed or irritated, they are withdrawn 
(or folded) into the anterior end of the body-cavity and the body appears to 
terminate in a blunt point. Preserved holothurians are usually in this condition 
unless some artificial means are used to prevent the contraction. The tentacles 
differ in form in different groups, but among Peruvian holothurians they are either 
arborescent, i. e. irregularly branched from near the base, or peltate, i. e. the 
branches are confined to the tip, where they form a more or less flat and circular 
disk. The body of a holothurian is more or less soft and smooth, but carries, 
either scattered all over the surface, or confined to five longitudinal areas (the 
ambulacra), little outgrowths or projections which like the tentacles are highly 
contractile. When these end in a flat sucking disc, they are called pedicels or 
tube-feet, but when more or less pointed, they are papillae. Papillae are often 
borne on large conical elevations called warts. The positive identification of 
holothurians is only possible when the internal anatomy and the calcareous 
particles in the skin (usually microscopic) are carefully examined. 

Key to the Sea-Cucumbers of the Peruvian Coast. 

Tentacles peltate. 
Body with large warts and conical papillae on the back and sides 

Stichopus fuscus 

Body without warts but covered by numerous pedicels . . Holothuria c.hilensis 
Tentacles arborescent. 

Tentacles 20, or sometimes fewer, either equal or more or less unequal 

in size Phyllophorus peruvicinm 

Tentacles 10. 

Pedicels arranged in more or less distinct series confined to the ambu- 
lacra, at least on the ventral surface. 
Pedicels in distinct series along the dorsal ambulacra; body 

elongated as usual in holothurians. 

Pedicels relatively few in two series along each ambu- 
lacrum Cucumaria leonina 

Pedicels more numerous, in, three or four series along each 

ambulacrum Cucumaria godeffroyi 

Pedicels wanting on back, but papillae present ; body with ends 

upturned and thus ascidian-shaped Colochirus peruanus 

Pedicels numerous, irregularly scattered all over body .... Thyone gibber 

Stichopus fuscus. 
H. Ludwig, 1874. Arb. Zool.-Zoot. Inst. Wurzburg, 2, p. 21. 

This species has been recorded from San Diego, California ; Mazatlan, Mexico ; 
Machalilla, Ecuador, and the west coast of Patagonia (see Ludwig, 1898a) and 
therefore doubtless occurs in the Chile-Peruvian region. It reaches a length of 


several hundred millimeters and the wart-like papillae of the back may be 5 mm. 
in diameter at base and 3-4 mm. high. The color in life, of the Ecuadorian 
specimen, was red. 

Holothuria chilensis. 
C. Semper, 1868. Reisen im Arch. d. Phil., 2 Th., 1, 5 heft, p. 249. 

Nothing is known of this species beyond what is given in the original descrip- 
tion, which was based on a specimen in the Hamburg Museum, labeled " Chile," 
and even the type specimen is no longer extant. As the genus is characteristic 
of the tropics and is well represented in the Panamic region, it probably occurs 
on the coast of Peru, and if the type of chilensis really came from Chile, that 
species is the one we should naturally expect to find. The specimen of H. vaga- 
bunda in the Stockholm Museum, labeled "Peru " (see Theel, 1886), is doubtless 
from " Peru " in the Gilbert Islands and not from South America. 

Phyllophorus peruvianue. 

Holothuria (Mulleria, Flemm.) peruviana R. P. Lesson, 1830. Cen. Zool., p. 124. 

Anaperus peruanus F. Troschel, 1846. Arch. f. Naturg., 12, Bd. 1, p. 61. 

Pattalus mollis Selenka, 1868. Zeit. f. w. Zool., 18, p. 113. 

Thyonidium peruanum Semper, 1868. Reisen im Arch. d. Phil., 2 Th., 1, 2 heft, p. 67 

Thyonidium molle Semper, 1868. Op. cit., 5 heft, p. 243. 

Thyone (Stolus) chilensis Semper, 1868. Op. cit., 5 heft, p. 241. 

Pattalus peruvianus Verrill, 1868. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 376. 

Eucyclus duplicatus Lampert, 1885. Die seewalzen, p. 290. 

Phyllophorus chilensis Ludwig, 1887. SB. Akad. Berlin, No. 54, p. 24. 

Phyllophorus mollis Ludwig, 1892. Die seewalzen, p. 347. 

Plate 14, figure 1. 

The above list of synonyms is by no means complete, but is sufficient to show 
how frequently this holothurian has served as the basis for a new name. This is 
due, not to any unusual variability, but to the unequal development of its numer- 
ous tentacles and to the very great (and usually unequal) contraction they undergo 
in death. Very few preserved specimens show twenty equally large and symmet- 
rically arranged tentacles; typically ten tentacles are large and ten small, and 
commonly in such specimens the small tentacles are arranged in five pairs 
alternating more or less perfectly with the five pairs of large ones ; in some speci- 
mens the tentacles appear to form two concentric circles. There can be very little 
doubt that the names given above all refer to the same animal. One of the speci- 
mens before me is almost exactly like Lesson's type in that it seems to have but 
eight tentacles and these are large and about equal ; dissection shows, however, 
the remaining tentacles of very unequal size, strongly contracted and withdrawn 
into the body. Ludwig (1898 b), while inclined to the view that Lesson's species 
is identical with Seleuka's, thinks Troschel's species and Semper's Thyone chilensis 
are different. He bases his opinion concerning the former on Troschel's statement 


that anal teeth or at least calcareous anal papillae are present, whereas in P. peru- 
vianus there is no trace of them. In view of the individual diversity shown by 
holothurians in the amount of calcification of the papillae near the anus, I do not 
think this objection outweighs TrosehePs own opinion that his species was iden- 
tical with Lesson's, and the fact that his having many specimens indicates that 
the species was the common holotlmrian of Peru. As regards chilensis, Ludwig 
maintains the separation of Semper's species from Seleuka's on the strength of 
differences in color, calcareous ring, stone-canals and polian vessels. The exami- 
nation of the specimens in the Coker collection has satisfied me that these differ- 
ences are not specific, red individuals showing the characters (in their internal 
anatomy) which ought to go witli green color and vice versa. Ludwig states that 
Plate regarded these supposed species as varieties which he designated as " die 
rothe " and " die grime " ; he found both forms under rocks at Iquique and Ca- 
vancha near Iquique. The largest specimen was 200 mm. long, 60 mm. thick. 
Coker found this species at La Punta, Callao, and north of there at the Pescadores 
Islands, Ancon, and in the Bay of Ferrol, near Chimbote. The known range is 
from Payta, Peru, to Talcahuauo, Chile. Of the specimens in the Coker collec- 
tion, those from La Punta are olive-green, those from Pescadores Island reddish 
purple, one from Bay of Ferrol bright purplish red, and those from " beach drift " 
at Ancon dull black. They show equal diversity in the structure of the calcareous 
ring, but the differences do not correlate with either color or locality. It seems 
to me, therefore, that we have in Phyllophorus peruvianus a well-characterized 
but somewhat variable species, the diverse forms and peculiarities of which offer a 
most interesting field of investigation to any one so situated that fresh material, 
especially of growth stages, is available. 

Cucumaria leonina. 

C. Semper, 1868. Reisen im Arch. d. Phil., 2 Th., 1, 2 heft, p. 53. 

Ludwig (1898 a) has given a full synonymy and an interesting account of this 
species. Although Semper's type was supposed to come from Singapore, Ludwig 
thinks the locality was probably wrongly noted, as the species has not been found 
in the East Indian region since. On the contrary, it \s a common species around 
the southern end of South America, extending eastward to the Falkland Islands 
and northward on the western coast of the continent to the southern part of Peru. 
It is usually 30-40 mm. long, but is known to reach a length of 70 mm. The 
color in life is usually rosy red or clear lake, but may be white tinged with red, 
and some of those taken by Plate at Calbuco, Chile, are recorded as " im Leben 
hell gelb." 

Cucumaria godeffroyi. 
C. Semper, 1868. Reisen im Arch. d. Phil., 2 Th., 1, 2 heft, p. 53. 

This species, originally discovered at Iquique, is now known to range south- 
ward, at least as far as Calbuco, and will probably be found on the southern 


coasts of Peru. It reaches a length of 55 mm., and in life is sulphur-yellow in 
color. It lives among mussel-shells (Mytilus) and stones in shallow water along 

Colochirus peruanus. 
C. Semper, 1868. Reisen im Arch. d. Phil, 2 Th., 1, 5 heft, p. 239. 

As this species has not been met with since it was described by Semper, there 
is nothing further to be recorded of it, save that the specimens he had were "yel- 
lowish," 15-18 mm. long and 6-7 mm. in diameter. They were recorded as from 
Peru, but whether it was Peru, South America, or Peru, Gilbert Islands, remains 
to be shown. 

Thyone gibber. 

Stolus gibber E. Selenka, 1867. Zeit. f. w. Zool., 17, p. 356. 

Thyone gibber C. Semper, 1868. Reisen im Arch. d. Phil., 2 Th., 1, 2 heft, p. 66. 

Plate 14, figures 2-6. 

Seleuka's description is very brief and he gives no figures, so that a detailed 
description and a few figures are desirable, especially as the species does not 
seem to have been met with since it was described; it is entirely overlooked 
by Lampert (1885) and omitted from his monograph. The following are the 
chief characters : 

Tentacles 10, of which the two ventral are very small. Pedicels very numer- 
ous, covering all parts of the body. Body wall firm and leathery. Calcareous 
ring well developed (fig. 2) ; radial pieces much larger than interradial and with 
conspicuous posterior prolongations. Polian vessels 3, of which one is very 
small. Stone-canal single, in the dorsal mesentery ; madreporic body elongate, 
cylindrical, truncate at end and somewhat convolute or spirally wound. Repro- 
ductive organs situated posterior to the middle of the body, consisting of a tuft 
of yellowish, unbranched tubules on each side of the mesentery. Alimentary 
canal and respiratory-trees apparently not peculiar. Anus without calcareous 
teeth. Calcareous deposits in body wall abundant, in the form of knobbed, per- 
forated buttons (figs. 3, 4) about .09 mm. long ; while there is more or less 
diversity in details and some are not perfectly formed, most of the buttons have 
4 large perforations, 10 knobs on the margin (on each surface) and 2 conspicuous, 
elevated knobs, connected by a thick ridge, in the middle of each surface. There 
seem to be no other deposits in the body wall. In the pedicels, besides terminal 
discs, we find that the buttons become elongated into curved supporting rods 
(figs. 5, 6), without knobs on the margin but flattened and perforated at the 
ends ; the knobs at the middle of the plate disappear on the concave surface, but 
remain as more or less conspicuous elevations on the convex side. The tentacles 
are literally packed full of perforated supporting plates and rods ; in the tips of 
the branches these are small and comparable with those in the pedicels, but in the 
main trunk and its branches they are much larger and are more like elongated 


perforated plates ; while most of them are flat, many are curved and the resem- 
blance to those in the pedicels is occasionally marked. The calcareous particles 
impart a very considerable rigidity to both body wall and tentacles. The largest 
specimen before me is 60 mm. long and 20 mm. in diameter, the smallest is 
only about one-fifth as long. All the specimens agree in color, though the 
depth of the shades shows considerable diversity. The darkest specimens are 
nearly or quite black, except for the ventral surface which is more or less whitish, 
sometimes in very marked contrast. In lighter specimens the dark shade is brown 
or gray and the ventral surface is yellowish or grayish. In only a few specimens 
is there a lack of sharp contrast between the upper and under surfaces. As a 
rule, the anterior part of the lower surface is colored like the back and the tenta- 
cles are always very dark. 

It is a matter of some interest that Dr. Coker should have met with this Pa- 
namic species in Peruvian waters ; there seems to be no good reason for doubting 
that his specimens are identical with Selenka's species. He took two specimens 
in the Bay of Sechura, in five fathoms, but at the Lobos de Afuera Islands he 
found this Thyone " very abundant." They were " collected from rocks in two 
feet of water (at half tide), near ' muello ' of Grace & Co., on the bay called ' Inde- 
pendencia ' (this little bay to be distinguished from the great bay of ' Indepen- 
dencia' on the coast, south of Pisco)." The color of these specimens in life is 
noted as "black." It may be added that the nearest relative of this species ap- 
pears to be Thyone buccalis Stimpson of Australia. , 


A. Agassiz. 

1863. List of the ecliinodenns sent to different institutions in exchange for 

other specimens, with annotations. Bull. M. C. Z., 1, p. 17-28. 
1872 a. Preliminary notice of a few species of Echini. Bull. M. C. Z., 3, 

p. 55-58. 
1872 b. Revision of the Echini. Mem. M. C. Z., 3, 774- pp., 94 pis. 

A. Agassiz and H. L. Clark. 

1908. Hawaiian and other Pacific Echini. The Salenidae, Arbaciadae, 
Aspidodiadematidae, and Diadematidae. Mem. M. C. Z., 34, p. 43-132, 
pis. 43-59. 

L. Agassiz. 

1841. Monographies d'^chiuodermes, Scutelles. 155 pp., 27 pis. 

L. Agassiz et E. Desor. 

1846. Catalogue Raisonne des families, des genres et des especes de la 
classe des Echinodermes. Ann. Sci. Nat., 6, p. 305-374, pis. 15-16. 

F. J. Bell. 

1893. On Odonlaster and its allied or synonymous genera of asteroid echi- 
noderms. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 259-262. 

H. M. de Blainville. 

1825. Oursin, Diet. Sci. Nat., 37, p. 59-98. 
H. L. Clark. 

1902. Papers from the Hopkins-Stanford Galapagos expedition, 1898-99. 
XII. Echinodermata. Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 4, p. 521-531. 

1907. The starfishes of the genus Heliaster. Bull. M. C. Z., 51, p. 23-76, 
pis. 1-8. 

1909. Scientific results of the trawling expedition of H. M. C. S. "Thetis" 
off the coast of New South Wales in February and March, 1898. Echi- 
nodermata. Mem. Australian Museum, 4, p. 517-564, pis. 47-58. 

F. Dujardin et H. Hupe. 

1862. Histoire naturelle des Zoophytes Echinodermes. p. 1-628. 
W. K. Fisher. 

1906. The starfishes of the Hawaiian Islands. Bull. U. S. F. C. for 1903, 
part 3, p. 987-1130, pis. 1-49. 

1908. Necesssary changes in the nomenclature of starfishes. Smithsonian 
Misc. Coll., 52, p. 87-93. 

C. Gay. 

1854. Historia fisica y politica de Chile. Zoologia, 8, 500 pp. 
J. E. Gray. 

1840. A synopsis of the genera and species of the class Hypostoma (A.ste- 
rias, Linnaeus). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 6, p. 175-184, 275-290. 


J. B. P. A. de Lamarck. 

1816. Histoire uaturelle des animaux sans vertebres. 2. Radiaires Echi- 
noderiues, p. 522-568. 

K. Lamport. 

1885. Die seewalzen. Holotlmrioidea. Eine systematische raonograpliie 

mit bestimmungs- und verbreitungs-tabellen. p. 1-310, pi. 1. 
J. L. Le Conte. 

1851. Zoological notes. Proc. Philadelphia Acad. Sci., 5, p. 317-320. 

F. Leipoldt. 

1895. Asteroidea der " Vettor-Pisani " Expedition (1882-1885). Zeit. f. 

w. Zool., 59, p. 545-654, pis. 31 and 32. . 
R. P. Lesson. 

1830. Centurie zoologique, ou choix d'animaux rares, nouveaux, ou impar- 

faitement connus. 254 pp., 80 pis. 
A. Ljungman. 

1867. Ophiuroidea viventia hue usque cognita enumerat. Ofv. Kongl. Vet.- 

Ak. Forh., 23, p. 303-336. 
P. de Loriol. 

1891. Notes pour servir a 1'^tude des echinodermes. 3. Mem. Soc. Phys. 
et Hist. Nat. Geneve, Suppl. Vol., 1890, p. 1-31, pis. 10-12. 

1900. Notes pour servir a 1'etude des echinodermes. 8. Rev. Suisse Zool. K 

8, p. 55-96, pis. 6-9. 
H. Ludwig. 

1874. Beitrage zur keuutniss der holothurieu. Arb. Zool.-Zoot. Inst. 
Wiirzburg, 2, p. 77-118, pis. 6 and 7. 

1887. Drei mittheilungen iiber alte und neue holothurienarten. SB. Ber- 
liner Akad., no. 54, p. 1217-1244, pi. 15. 

1892. Echinodermen. I Buch. Die seewalzen. In Bronn's Klassen und 
Ordnungen des Thierreichs, 2, Abt. 3, 468 pp., pis. 1-17. 

1898 a, Holothufien. Ergebn. d. Hamburger Magalhaensische Sammel- 

reise, 98 pp., 3 pis. 
1898 b. Die holothurieu der sammlung Plate. Zool. Jahrb. Suppl. 4, 

Fauna Chilensis, Hft. 2, p. 431-454, pi. 26. 

C. F. Lutken. 

1856. Bidrag til kundskab om slangestjernenie. 3. Bidrag til kundskab 

om ophiurerne ved Central- Arnerikas vestkyst. Vid. Med. f. 1856, 

p. 20-26. 
1859 a. Additamenta ad historian! Ophiuridarum. Pt. 2, p. 77-169, 

pis. 1-5. 
1859 b. Bidrag til kundskab om de ved kysterne af Mellem- og Syd- 

Amerika levende arter af sostjerner. Vid. Med. f. 1859, p. 25-96. 
1865. Kritiske bemaerkninger om forskjellige sostjerner (Asterider) med 

beskrivelse af nogle nye arter. Vid. Med. f. 1864, p. 123-169. 


C. F. Liitken. 

1871. Fortsatte kritiske og beskrivende bid rag til kundskab om sostjer- 
nerne (Asteriderne). Vid. Med. f. 1871, p. 227-304, pis. 4 and 5. 

T. Lyman. 

1860. Descriptions of new Ophiuridae belonging to the Smithsonian Insti- 
tution and to the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Cambridge. Proc. 
Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 7, p. 193-204, 252-262. 

1882. The voyage of H. M. S. Challenger. Zoology. 5, pt. 14. Report 
on the Ophiuroidea. 385 pp., 48 pis. 

E. von Martens. 

1866. Ueber ostasiatische echiuodermen. Arch. f. Naturg., Jahrg. 32, 
bd. 1, p. 57-88. 

M. Meissner. 

1892. Asteriden gesammelt von Herrn Stabsarzt Dr. Sander auf der Reise 

S.M.S. "Prinz Adalbert." Arch. f. Naturg., 58, bd. 1, p. 183. 
1896. Die von Dr. Plate aus Chile heimgebrachten see-igel. Die von 
Hernn Dr. L. Plate aus Chile und Feuerlaud heimgebrachten see-sterne. 
Arch. f. Naturg., 62, bd. 1, p. 83-108, pi. 6. 

F. J. F. Meyen. 

1834. Reise urn die erde. Erste Theil. 503 pp. 

G. I. Molina. 

1782. Saggio sulla storia naturale del Chili. 8vo. 

J. Muller und F. Troschel. 

1843. Neue beitrage zur kenntniss der asteriden. Arch. f. Naturg., 9, 
bd. 1, p. 113-131. 

E. Perrier. 

1869. Recherches sur les pedicellaires et les ambulacres des asteries et des 
oursins. Ann. Sci. Nat., 12, p. 197-304, pis. 17 and 18. 

1876. Revision des stellerides du Museum. Arch. Zool. Exp., 5, p. 1-104. 

1878. litude sur la repartition geographique des asterides. Nouv. Arch. 
Mus. Hist. Nat., (2) 1, p. 1-108. 

1891. Mission scientifique du Cap Horn. 1882-1883. 6, Zoologie, 
troisieme partie. Echinodermes. 1. Stellerides. K1-K198. 

R. A. Philippi. 

1857. Vier neue echinodermen des Chilenischen meeres. Arch. f. Naturg., 
23, bd. 1, p. 130-134. 

A. T. de Rochebrune. 

1881. Materiaux pour la faune de 1'Archipel du Cap Vert. Nouv. Arch, 
du Mus. His. Nat., (2) 4, p. 215-338. The title on the cover of fasc. 2, 
vol. 4, is printed "Materiaux pour le flore de 1'Archipel du Cap Vert." 


E. Selenka. 

1867. Beitrage zur anatomic und systematik der liolothurien. Zeit. f. w. 
Zool., 17, p. 291-374, pis. 17-20." 

1868. Nachtrag dazu. Zeit. f. w. Zool., 18, p. 109-119, pi. 8. 

C. Semper. 

1868. Reiseu im arcliipel der Philippine!!. 2 Theil. Wissenscliaftliclie 
resultate. Bd. 1. Holotlmrien. 288 pp., 40 pis. 

W. P. Sladen. 

1889. The voyage of H. M. S. Challenger. Zoology. 30. Report on 
the Asteroidea. 935 pp., 118 pis., in two volumes. 

H. Th<el. 

1886. The voyage of H. M. S. Challenger. Zoology. 14, pt. 39. Report 
on the Holothurioidea, part 2. 290 pp., 16 pis. 

F. Troschel. 

1846. Neue holothurien-gattungen. Arch. f. Naturg., 12, bd. 1, p. 60-66. 

A. Valenciennes. 

1846. Voyage autour du monde sur la fregate La Venus pendant les 
annees 1836-39. Atlas 4: Zoophytes. 

A. E. Verrill. 

1867. Notes on the echinoderms of Panama and west coast of America, 
with descriptions of new genera and species. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, 
p. 251-322. 

1868. Notice of a collection of echinoderms from La Paz, Lower Cali- 
fornia, with descriptions of a new genus. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, 
p. 371-376. 

1871. Additional observations on echinoderms, chiefly from the Pacific 
coast of America. Trans. Conn. Acad., 1, p. 568-593. 

1899. Revision of certain families and genera of West Indian ophiurans. 
Trans. Conn. Acad., 10, p. 301-371, pis. 42 and 43. 

1901. Additions to the fauna of the Bermudas. Trans. Conn. Acad., 11, 
p. 15-62. 

Clark. The Echinc .". ms of Peru. 



Fig. 1. Astropecten erinaceus. Capon, Peru. Upper surface. X f . 
Fig. 2. Luidia Columbia. Capon, Peru. Upper surface. X H- 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate i. 

Clark. The Echinoderms of Peru. 


Fig. 1. Luidia phragma. Talcahuano, Chile. Upper surface. X f . 

Fig. 2. Asterina chilensis. Bay of Sechura, Peru. Upper surface. X f 

Fig. 3. Asterina chilensis. Lobos de Afuera Islands, Peru. Upper surface. 

Fig. 4. Odontaster singularis. Shoal Bay, Patagonia. Upper surface. X -, 

Fig. 5. Henricia hyadesi. Eastern Patagonia. Upper surface. X f . 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 2. 

Clark. The Echinoderms of Peru. 


Fig. 1. Parasterina obesa. lalcahuano, Chile. Upper surface. X f. 
Fig. 2. Parasterina obesa. Talcahuano, Chile. Lower surface. X |. 
Fig. 3. Paulia horricla. Galapagos Islands. Upper surface. X $ 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 3. 

Clark. The Echinoderms of Peru. 


Fig. 1. Greasier occidentalis. Lower California. Upper surface. X 
Fig. 2. Nidorellia armata. La Paz, Mexico. Upper surface, X . 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 4. 

Clark. The Echinoderms of Peru. 


Fig. 1. Phataria unifascialis. Acapulco, Mexico 1 Lower surface. X 
Fig. 2. Pharia pyramidata. Acapulco, Mexico 1 Lower surface. X i- 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 5. 

Clark. The Echinoderms of Peru. 


Fig. 1. Mithrodia bradleyi. Arica, Peru ? Upper surface. X 
Fig. 2. Asterias gelatinosa. Talcahuano, Chile. Upper surface. X |. 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 6, 

Clark. The Echinoderms of Peru. 


Fig. 1. Heliaster polybrachius. Payta, Peru. Upper surface. X . 

Fig. 2. Heliaster helianthus. Pescadores Islands, Peru. Upper surface. X . 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 7. 

CUrk. The Echinoderms of Peru. 


Fig. 1. Stichaster aurantiacus. Caldera, Chile. Upper surface. X 
Fig. 2. Ophioderma panamense. Lower California. Upper surface. X |- 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 8. 

Clark. The Echinoderms of Peru. 


Fig. 1. Amphiodia chtlensis. Calbuco, Chile. Lower surface. X 1.3. 

Fig. 2. Amphipholis pugetana. San Lorenzo Island, Peru. Upper surface. X 2.5. 

Fig. 3. Ophiactis kroyeri. Talcahuano, Cbile. Upper surface. X 1.3. 

Fig. 4. Ophiothrix magnifica. Payta, Peru. Upper surface. X 1.3. 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 9. 

Clark. The Echinoderms of Peru. 

PLATE 10. 

Fig. 1. Tetrapygus niger. Talcahuano, Chile. Upper surface. X f . 

Fig. 2. Arbacia spatuligera. San Lorenzo Island, Peru. Upper surface. X 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 10. 

Clark. The Echiuoclerms of Peru. 

PLATE 11. 

Fig. 1. Echinometra van brunti. Mazatlan, Mexico. Upper surface. Nat, size, 
Fig. 2. Podophora pedifera. Fakarava, Paumotus. Side view. Nat. size. 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate ii 

Clark. The Echiuoderms of Peru. 

PLATE 12. 

Fig. 1. Strongylocentrotus albus. Talcahuano, Chile. Upper surface. Nat. size. 
Fig. 2. Strongylocentrotus gibbosus. Payta, Peru. Upper surface. Nat. size. 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 12. 

Clark. The Echinoderms of Peru. 

PLATE 13. 

Fig. 1 Encope micropora. Bay of Sechura, Peru. Upper surface. X 

Fig. 2 Mellita stokesii. Tumbes, Peru. Upper surface. X $. 

Fig. 3 Lovenia cordiformis. San Diego, Cal. Upper surface. X f . 

Fig. 4 Agassizia scrobiculata. Capon, Peru. Side view. X f. 

Clark. Echinoderms. 

Plate 13. 


Clark. The Echinoderma of Peru. 

PLATE 14. 

Fig. 1. Phyllophorus peruvianus. La Punta, Callao, Peru. Side view. Nat. size. 
Fig. 2. Part of calcareous ring of Thyone gibber. Lobos de Af uera Islands, 

Peru. X 5. 
Fig. 3. Calcareous " button " from body wall of Thyone gibber. Lobos de Af uera 

Islands, Peru. X 450. 

Fig. 4. The same as 3, but seen from the side. X 450. 
Fig. 5. Calcareous supporting rod of pedicel of same Thyone. X 450. 
Fig 6. The same as 5, but seen from the side. X 450. 



The following' Publications of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 
are in preparation :- 

LOUIS CABOT. Immature State of the Odonata, Part IV. 
E. L. MARK. Studies on Lepidosteus, continued. 

" On Araclmactis. 

A. AGASSIZ -And G. O. WHITMAN. Pelagic Fishes. Part II., with 14 Plates. 
A. AGASSIZ and H. L. CLARK. The " Albatross " Hawaiian Echini. 
S. GARMAN. The Plagiostomes. 

Reports on the Results of Dredging Operations in 1877, 1878, 1879, and 1880, in charge of ALEX- 
ANDER AGASSIZ, by the U. S. Coast Survey Steamer " Blake," as follows : 

C. HARTLAU B. The Comatulae of the " Blake," with 15 Plates. 

H. LUDWIG. The Genus Pentacrinus. 

A. MILNE EDWARDS and E. L. BOUVIER. The Crustacea of the "Blake." 

A. E. VERRILL. The Alcyonaria of the " Blake." 

Reports on the Results of the Expedition of 1891 of the U. S. Fish Commission Steamer 
"Albatross," Lieutenant Commander Z. L. TANNER, U. S. N., Commanding, in charge of 

H. B. BIGELOW. The Siphonophores. 
K. BRANDT. The Sagittae. 

The Thalassicolae. 
O. CARLGREN. The Actinarians. 
W. R. COE. The Nemerteans. 
REINHARI) DOHRN. The Eyes of Deep- 

Sea Crustacea. 
H. J. HANSEN. The Cirripeds. 

" The Schizopods. 

HAROLD HEATH. Solenogaster. 

W. A. HERDMAN. The Ascidians. 
S. J. H1CKSON. The Antipathids. 
E. L. MARK. Branchioceria.sthns. 
JOHN MURRAY. The Bottom Specimens 
P. SCH1EMENZ. The Pteropods and 

THEO- STUDER. The Alcyouarians. 

The Salpidae and Doliolidae. 

H. B. WARD. The Sipunculids. 

W. McM. WOOD WORTH. The Annelids. 

Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition to the Tropical Pacific, in charge of 
ALEXANDKK AGASSIZ, on theU. S. Fish Commission Steamer "Albatross," from August, 
1899, to March, 1900, Commander Jefferson F. Moser, U. S. N., Commanding, as follows : 
A. AGASSIZ. The Echini. G . W. MULLER. The Ostracods. 

MARY J. RATH BUN. The Crustacea 


H. L. CLARK. The Holothurians. 

The Volcanic Rocks. 

The Coralliferous Limestones. 

J. M. FLINT. The Foraminifera and Radi- 


S. HENS HAW. The Insects. 
OCTGH. The Fishes. 

The Hydrocoral- 


G. O. SARS. The Copepods. 
L. STEJNEGER. The Reptiles. 
C. H. TOWNSEND. The Mammals, Birds, 

and Fishes. 

R. LENDENFELD. The Siliceous Sponges. T. W. VAUGHAN. The Corals, Recent and 



The Starfishes and Ophi- Fossil. 

W. McM. WOODWORTH. The Annelids. 


230 Earth Sciences Bldg. 642-2997 

14 DAYS 






Books needed for class reserve are subject to immediate recall 






FORM NO. DD8, 6m, 477 


muoiis irom me Zoological Laboratory, Professor E. L. Mark, Director, 
mtributions from the Geological Laboratorj-. 

These publications are issued in numbers at irregular intervals ; 
one volume of the Bulletin (8vo) and half a volume of the Memoirs 
(4to) usually appear annually. Each number of the Bulletin and 
of the Memoirs is sold separately. A price list of the publications 
of the Museum will be sent on application to the Curator of the 
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Mass. 

Syracuse, N. Y. 
Stockton, C.lif.