Skip to main content

Full text of "An electronic wave-height measureing apparatus"

See other formats


NAVY DEPARTMENT 
THE DAVID W. TAYLOR MODEL BASIN 


WASHINGTON 7, D.C. 


October 1953 Report 859 


AN ELECTRONIC WAVE-HEIGHT MEASURING APPARATUS 


by 


W.S. Campbell 


October 1953 Report 859 


li 


NP21-50845 


Wave-Height Measuring Apparatus 


ili 


TABLE OF CONTENTS 


MIRA FUR: MIESING Dp NGS EG Maas coscscesaecsscstes cons aac veces cur eMiccesstaap atin atte ences eetee aston ae 
Gapinpablemenitpercrsscster seen tocecceoes igs sda lod ncaa Sceesathamamtia ateaewameitea eeniak rane ceaeer ene 
TS CEFONTCH OVS LOM access sesh costes ssaedssswessbucoa Uaruss ayataunest ete neciaereve nua emecentareaceenic coset cance 


FUG COL GG rap een cere aera eae vaithires dea rancece des ccdiunrdticodumuets Steet te medi Maer aeUn zeae ou Mann aa sear 
OE EAGT IN eee en ae ce eee edd sre Coates eda cales a ope aaa be eeeaene ete eRe te 
ESE RAE) OED MAU GI vee pecans ees eect ccna ceed cnites od tea edhe Seeee Pee aGRREE sheers OME oe aah cee 
PERSONNEL AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...........:::ccsccceececeseeeseeeenseeesceeseeenseeessees 


APPENDIX 
Nien Gap eza ctor Ol sWiLen Galena .s.cetcea: sscccssytsessdecttrgpeabeasetcettsnestebateeon cekce se aeeeeeae 


Beplainearity CONSIGCrAtlONS ces cesacsceenc cesses csoses antes tascces scan actoecavacs eensse se cneueraeeeaeee 


EVE BE RUBIN G BiS tesa ioc deeeeeteaatene nell sraena sya, clue cprsesenousatecaeuuetercesar seed cauatssiene ee mentee 


ERRATA SHEET 
for 
DAVID TAYLOR MODEL BASIN REPORT 859 


In Figure 4, page 7, the three transformers Shown in the semigne ampli- 
fier portion of the schematic diagram are identical. Cores should be shown 
in all three. They are manufactured by the Audio Bevotopient Company as 
their type A-5511. 


NOTE: See Figure 4, page 7. In later models of the instrument all the 
calibrating capacitors shown as 17, 36, 64 ......-. 114 uufd, were not in- 
cluded. Only one, the 106 uufd capacitor was permanently connected to the 
calibrating switch, thereby providing an easy means of checking the opera- 
tion of the instrument. Calibration is accomplished by actually moving the 
transducer up and then down in the water. The extra switch section which 
was required for the calibrating capacitors is not used. 


In Figure 5, page 8, the rectifier tube is erroneously shown as a type 
6AS7; actually, two type 5U4 tubes, each with their plates connected in par- ~ 
allel, are used. 

In Figure 5, both output tubes in the amplifier circuit are type 6V6, 
although only one is so indicated. 


ABSTRACT 


This report describes briefly the salient features of new instrumentation 
for measuring and recording the wave amplitudes and wave forms of water waves. 
This instrumentation was developed by the Electronic Circuit Development Branch* 
of the Electronic Engineering Division of the David Taylor Model Basin, at the re- 
quest of the Hydromechanics Laboratory. Because of the increased accuracy and 
flexibility afforded by the instrumentation described, it has replaced other tech- 
niques which were formerly used. 

The gaging element of this system consists of extremely small insulated 
wire, suspended rigidly upright in the water. The conductor acts as one plate of 
a capacitor and the water in which the gaging element is partially submerged acts 
as the other; the insulation material on the wire forms the dielectric of the capac- 
itor. The capacity of this ‘‘condenser’’ (measured between the conductor and 
water) is directly proportional to the linear length of the submerged portion of 
the wire. This capacitor is connected in one arm of a resonant-bridge circuit, 
which may be.balanced for the quiescent level of the water. Variations in water 
height which occur as waves pass the gaging element produce capacitive unbal- 
ance of the a-c bridge in each sense, and the direction of unbalance is recovered 
by a more or less conventional phase sensitive demodulator circuit incorporated 
in the circuit of the wave-height recorder. 

This report includes schematic wiring diagrams of the instrument, its 
power supply, and a direct-coupled amplifier suitable for driving the recording 


galvanometer in a Sanborn direct-writing recorder. 


INTRODUCTION 


For the accurate measurement of small amplitude water waves, it is, of course, desir- 
able to use a gaging element whose presence will least affect the height or form of the wave; 
ideally, measurement of amplitude should be made at one very small point or along an imagi- 
nary vertical line, normal to the still surface of the water. One previously used technique 
for measuring wave height and profile at the David Taylor Model Basin was to photograph a 
grid alongside the basin wall. It was found that small imperfections along the wall or even the 
engraved grid lines created a considerable adverse effect on the shape of the wave. Moreover 
because of viscosity and surface tension effects in the proximity of the wall, it was found 
highly desirable to measure wave profile at some distance from the wall. A further disadvan- 
tage of the photographic method is the necessity for development of the film, which requires 


considerable time, and, at best, one obtains only the amplitude and profile of one particular 


*Now the Metric Systems Branch of the Instrumentation Division. 


wave. In the adjustment of water-wave generators it is advantageous to be able to observe 
the effect of various adjustments on a direct-writing recorder which is producing a continuing 
record of each wave as it passes the measurement point. A still further disadvantage of the 
photographic method lies in the relative difficulty of moving the measurement point out near 
the center of the basin or to other points along the length of the basin at which measurements 
are required. 

On 18 January 1952, the Electronics Engineering Division received a request from the 
Hydromechanics Laboratory to develop reliable instrumentation of this type which preferably 
should possess none of the disadvantages met in the application of photographic methods then 
in use. The following performance requirements were stated in lieu of specifications: 

The instrumentation should be capable of measuring and recording amplitudes of water 
waves in the range of 0 to a maximum of 2 ft; the lengths of the waves to be recorded lie with- 
in the range of 2 ft to 30 ft, with corresponding periods of 0.564 to 2.43 sec; frequency re- 
sponse should be such as to show no more than +1 percent variation in amplitude from 0 to 
at least 2 cps. A maximum error of 1/4 in. in 2 ft of wave height was to be allowable. 

A study of various techniques employed at other laboratories engaged in work of the 
same general nature was made.!*? All systems investigated by the author were found unsatis- 
factory for this particular purpose because of their inability to satisfy the accuracy and fre- 
quency-response requirements or their dependence on the chemical composition of the water. 
Float systems usually fail to respond rapidly enough to ‘‘follow’’ rise and fall of extremely 
short waves due to the inertia of the float or the friction or mass of the pickup unit attached; 
moreover it is difficult to design a float which will approach, dimensionally, the requirement 
for measuring the wave height at a single point. Systems which depend on the variation of 
electrical resistance between two probes immersed in the water approach the dimensional re- 
quirement but suffer from their dependence on the mineral content of the water, corrosion, or 
oxidation of the probes and cleanliness of the water surface. 

The capacitive -wire gage system described herein meets or exceeds all the require- 
ments and avoids the difficulties stated in the preceding paragraph; further advantages which 
influenced the choice of this system over the many other types of systems in current use 
included the fact that there are no critical tolerances or spacing adjustments, it has excellent 


linearity characteristics, is easily cleaned or replaced, and is inexpensive. 


MEASUREMENT SYSTEM 


The measurement system described in this report is known at the Taylor Model Basin 
as the type 145-A Dynamic Wave-Height Recorder. For discussion, it may be divided into 
three major functional parts--the gaging element, the electronic circuitry, and the direct- 


writing recorder. (See the semi-pictorial sketch, Figure 1). The principle of operation may 


tReferences are listed on page 13. 


Input Capacity between FE 1 
Points land 2 | Bridge Drive 
Resonates L, | | 
Output Capacity | ee : 
between Points 3 and4 | 
Resonates L, l \ | 
Amplifier and | 
| Demodulator | 
| , Circuits 
3 | 
| | 
| —— 
10 kc Resonant Bridge Carrier System s 


DC Amplifier 
and 
Power Supply 


Model 60 
Sanborn 
Recorder 


Figure 1 - Functional Block Diagram of Apparatus 


be described briefly as follows: 

The rise and fall of the water level in which the gaging element has been immersed 
produces very nearly linear changes of electrical capacitance as measured between the two 
terminals of the gage; the gage forms a small part of a larger fixed capacitor which is one 
arm of a resonant a-c bridge. These relatively small capacitance changes produce output 
voltages from the bridge which are proportional in amplitude and phase, to the degree and 
sense of the bridge unbalance. These voltages are amplified and demodulated in a linear 
phase sensitive detector which produces a d-c voltage proportional to the height of the water 
surface as measured from the water level at which the bridge was first balanced (usually the 
quiescent water level before waves were generated). This varying d-c voltage is then further 
amplified and furnishes the driving power required for the direct-writing recorder. Each of 
the three units so briefly referred to above are described in greater details in the following 


paragraphs. 


GAGING ELEMENT 


Probably the most interesting part of the system is the gaging element itself. It con- 
sists simply of a length of No, 28 enamel covered copper magnet wire stretched tightly be- 
tween two support points, one below the water surface and the other located an equal distance 


above the surface on a vertical line running through the lower point. The distance between 


== ~— Cable to Instrument these two support points may be about twice 
the expected double peak amplitude of the 
largest wave to be measured, This wire is 
completely insulated from any electrical con- 
tact with the water. One type of suitable gage 


support bracket is shown on the sketch, Figure 


Number 28E 


nBer 2. The J-shaped support bracket is fabricated 


from a length of 1/4-in. brass rod. The lower 
Water Surface Dory Mees pid : : 
end of the gaging wire is fitted with an insula- 
tor coupling which plugs into a small bayonet- 
type socket, an integral part of the lower end 
Wave Motion 
of the bent brass rod. The upper end of the 
wire is fastened, electrically and mechanically, 
to a 2-pin cable connector mounted on the upper 
Figure 2 - Sketch of Gage and support member. The connecting cable (any 
Support Bracket reasonable length of high-quality, low-capacity 
cable such as Amphenol RG-62U) is fitted with a connector in such a manner that the “‘high”’ 


’? shield side makes electrical con- 


side contacts the conductor in the gage wire and the “‘low 
tact with the water through the upper support arm and the J-shaped brass rod. A tensile pull 
of about 3 pounds has been found sufficient to maintain the wire taut and straight under all 
conditions encountered in tests so far conducted. 

Electrically, the conductor of the gaging element and the water in which it is immersed 
form two plates of a coaxial capacitor. Measurements made with the General Radio precision 
capacitance bridge indicate that the capacity of this unique condenser varies linearly with the 
length of submerged portion of the gage wire. This is not surprising since the wire diameter 
is very closely controlled by the manufacturer and the thickness of the enamel insulation is 
very nearly uniform. The power factor of the gage in the water is exceptionally good espe- 
cially if at least 4 in. of the wire are always wetted. No appreciable difficulty has been ob- 
served from meniscus or flowback effects, and static peak-to-peak calibrations obtained by 
physically moving the gage element up and down in the water hold equally well for dynamic 
conditions. 

The choice of gaging wire size was made by use of experimental methods to determine 
the degree of error encountered under dynamic conditions; the use of very large wire, rod, or 
tubing, which might seem desirable from the support problem viewpoint, is precluded by sur- 
face tension and slow flowback effects when the water recedes. The No. 28 enameled copper 
wire appeared to be about the optimum since the capacity changes follow wave-height varia- 
tions up to at least 4 cps with negligible phase error, and yet it can be put under sufficient 


tension to avoid bending by the advancing waves. 


ELECTRONIC SYSTEM 


The electronic apparatus is required to transform the changes in capacitance which 
appear in the gaging element into proportional current or voltage variations to drive the recor- 
der. The equipment as designed provides a sensitivity range of 0.60 to 25.0 in. (trough to © 
crest wave amplitude) for full-scale (80-mm) recorder deflection. A precision attenuator is 
built in which allows selection of 10 fixed sensitivity positions--0.60, 1.0, 1.5, 2.5, 4.0, 6.0, 
10, 15, 25, and 40-in. peak-to-peak amplitude for full-scale recorder deflection. Calibration 
is accomplished by switching the calibrating condensors which are chosen by the setting of 
the attenuator first to one side of the bridge and then to the other. This simulates equal in- 
cremental variations in water level about the zero reference point, i.e., the water level at 
which the bridge was initially balanced by the operator. 

The circuits employed are a modification and adaptation of those employed in the reso- 
nant-bridge carrier system which has been used for some time for the measurement of extreme- 
ly small changes in capacitance.* The system consists of a doubly resonant capacitance 
bridge which is driven by the output of a 10-ke oscillator-amplifier circuit, an attenuator, a 
2-stage voltage amplifier and a dual demodulator, the output of which is a d-c voltage whose 
magnitude and polarity are proportional to height of the water surface from any arbitrary zero 
point chosen by the operator (usually, but not necessarily, the quiescent water level in the 
avsence of waves). A block diagram of the complete system is shown in Figure 3. The 10-kc 
oscillator-amplifier circuit (block 1) supplies the excitation to the resonant bridge (block 2) 


which incorporates provision for manually balancing out the resistive and reactive components 


10 ke 


Voltage Null Sanborn 
Amplifier Detector Recorder 


Oscillator and 
Power Amplifier 


| 6 
: Resonant Direct 
ee Capacitive Attenuator Demodulator Coupled 
Bridge Amplifier 
3 2 4 t 8 


Figure 3 - Block Diagram of the Type 145-A Dynamic Wave-Height Recording System 


of gaging-element impedance which is connected in parallel with one arm of the bridge. Drive 
voltage is applied to the bridge from a balanced source, which permits grounding (earthing) 
of one of the bridge terminals which is also connected through a cable (RG-62U) to the ground 
side of the gaging element, (see Figure 2). This is a necessary condition since the body of 
water in which the gaging element is to be submerged is used as the ground reference potential 
point for the entire system. Unbalance voltages arising at the opposite terminal of this bridge, 
which is initially manually balanced for still-water conditions, are applied to the attenuator 
(block 4) and thence to the voltage amplifier and demodulator circuits (blocks 5 and 7). The 
null indicator (block 6) is employed in order to ascertain when bridge balance has veen achiev- 
ed. The output of the demodulator circuit is a d-c voltage which varies from 0 to 2 volts in 
either polarity as a linear function of water height. The output impedance at this point is 
quite high and should not be loaded heavily in the interest of linearity. Since very little 
power can be drawn from this circuit, a direct-coupled power amplifier (block 8) is designed 
to match the particular recorder chosen (block 9). Any desired recorder could, of course, be 
used provided that a suitable power-amplifier circuit is substituted. 

Copies of the final schematic wiring diagrams of the gage control unit and the power 


supply-amplifier unit are included as Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. 


RECORDER 


The instrument described in this report is designed particularly for use with the San- 
born* Model 60 direct-writing electromagnetic recorder. (This model is a two-channel unit, 
which is used in those measurements where waves are to be measured at two points simultan- 
eously.) This recorder is equipped with heated stylii and records on heat-sensitive paper. 
Frequency response is uniform to about 40 cps, which is far more than adequate for this ap- 
plication. The galvanometers (pen motors) are rugged and reliable, and, except for some 
slight mechanical hysterisis which amounts to approximately 0.25 mm on the record, the re- 
corder is quite satisfactory. With the amplifier shown in the schematic diagram, Figure 5, 
full-scale deflections of +2 cm from the center can be obtained with good linearity. One 
great advantage realized by use of this recorder is the rectilinear recording feature which 
facilitates analysis of recorded wave forms. A wide range of paper speeds is made available 
by changing gears in the chart drive mechanism; in addition a quick shift ratio of 10 to 1 may 


be accomplished by a small lever located on the control panel. 


*Manufactured by the Sanborn Company, Cambridge 39, Mass. 


Jopiooey JUS TeP-oAB\ OIUeUAG 
V-SFT ed], ey) Jo IU JOINUOD oFeH oY) Jo WeIdeIG FuULIN ONeUEYDS - F ons 


94 Ol 0} paunt 
SHNINID yUoL IV 


Ol 
ws'0 


yur] SSOJ9Y SWHY Al 


ie) 
= 
3j00 oa 
Ove e 
a 
GZo ® 
sto 
Ole 
so 
vo > 
= 
SZo w 
_SOl-8i- : 8 
2 ZOIENY = Sik * 
O'lo & 
sayou! 910 o o 


AOG2+ 


Helipot | Centering 


T-20654 T-20054 


4 
te 
vt 
x 
S 
CN) 
Power 4 
Input 5 
Pilot Lamp 


To 6x5- 
Ine 
3 amp 5K 
IE To 6SJ7 3amp OW 
Heaters Only 


To Heaters on both 
Chassis |Oamp 


Figure 5 - Schematic Wiring Diagram of the Power Supply-Amplifier Unit 
of the Type 145-A Dynamic Wave-Height Recorder 


OPERATION 


For operation the instrument may be powered from any source of 115-volt, 60-cycle, 
single-phase voltage capable of furnishing at least 300 watts of power. The gaging element 
should be mounted on a rigid support in such a manner that approximately half the length of 
the insulated wire is submerged. One such support designed for use at the Model Basin is 
equipped with a fine screw adjustment by which the gaging element can be raised or lowered 
in the water. This permits a simple and direct means of calibrating the entire system. After 
the instrument has been turned on for about five minutes or more and the gaging wire has been 
placed at the desired point, the operator may proceed to balance the bridge by means of the 
controls provided for this purpose. Bridge balance is obtained in the usual manner prescribed 


for balancing a-c bridges, utilizing the null indicator meter deflections as a guide. Maximum 


deflection of this meter obtainable by adjustment of the decade capacitor and resistance bal- 
ance controls indicates that the bridge is balanced. If difficulty in arriving at balance is en- 
countered with a high-sensitivity setting of the attenuator, this control may be rotated toward 
the 25-in. position until a position is reached where the null indicator meter responds to ad- 
justment of the balance controls. 

After the bridge has been balanced, the operator should select the attenuator position 
whose marking most nearly approximates the peak-to-peak amplitude of the expected waves 
to be recorded. At this time, calibration may be performed by raising and lowering the gage 
element through an accurately measured distance and recording the corresponding deflections 


of the recording pen. 


PERFORMANCE 


A complete wave-height recording system of the type described in this report was in- 
stalled in the miniature model basin in late March 1952. After an initial period devoted to 
calibration, testing, and minor adjustments to suit the selected operating conditions, the per- 


formance characteristics were verified to be as follows: 


1. Maximum usable sensitivity was 0.6 in. (double peak amplitude) of wave height which 
produced 3 cm deflection of the recording stylus; (the built-in sensitivity control provides 


attenuation in 10 fixed steps covering the range from 0.6 to 40 in. of wave height). 


2, Linearity of the gaging element and the electronic system is approximately 1 percent 
of full scale on any sensitivity range selected. The recorder itself was found accurate to 


approximately 2 percent of full scale. 


3. Resolution (on the record) on the most sensitive step of the sensitivity control is of 


the order of 0.010 in. of change in water level. 


4, Frequency response of the system was measured by mounting the gage and its support- 
ing bracket on a cam-driven vertical oscillator whose frequency of vibration was adjustable 
from 0 to about 5 cps. Response was found to be uniform up to the upper frequency limit of 
the mechanical oscillator. There is no reason to believe that the range of uniform response 
does not extend considerably above 5 cps, since no measurable amplitude distortion was 


evident at this frequency. 


Figure 6 is a photographic copy of one continuous record taken in the 140-ft towing 
basin by personnel of the Hydromechanics Laboratory using the instrumentation system de- 
scribed. The upper trace on each strip shows the record obtained from a gage placed 38 ft 
from the wavemaker and the lower trace shows the record from another gage located 22 ft 
from the wavemaker. 

Early in October 1952, an exact duplicate of this system was constructed and placed 
in use along with the original pilot model. The performance characteristics of this system 


were found to be identical to the first one, and no adjustments or modifications were required. 


5s al il 
ES EEE TEE 
La BI | 


Wave Length 4 ft 
Blower Speed 1940 rpm 
Paper Speed 50 mm/sec 


10 


Pneumatic Wavemaker Installation 
10 ft x 5 ft x 140 ft Basin 
Data Obtained 30 January 1953 


(Tet Te 
Ae Hy 


HN | Ate 


ane 
EBs 


(c) Steady-state conditions at both measurement stations. 


Figure 6 - Record of Wave in the 140-ft Basin 


Photographic copy of one continuous record taken in the 140-ft towing basin. The upper trace on each 


strip shows the record obtained from a gage placed 38 ft from the wavemaker; the lower trace shows the 


record obtained from another gage placed 22 ft from the wavemaker. 


Since October 1952, both of these measurement systems have been in continual use on one 


or another of the various research programs currently being conducted at the Model Basin. 


It is felt that this instrumentation, although simple in principle and design, represents a 


forward step in the technique of recording small wave heights and wave forms. 


11 


PERSONNEL AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


The conception and design of the wave-height measuring system described herein was 
the work of the author. The pilot model of this instrument was constructed by other members 
of the Instrumentation Division who contributed many valuable suggestions and constructional 
““‘know-how.*’ Messrs. Howard Reese and Paul Golovato of the Hydrodynamics Division per- 
formed calibration, linearity, and frequency response tests, the results of which are included 


as a part of the verified quantitative performance characteristic data in this report. 


12 
APPENDIX 


A. GAGE FACTOR OF WIRE GAGE 


The increment in capacitance AC produced by a change in water height Ah may be 
computed from the formula, 


AC 


Tk 0.555 uf per cm [1] 


ih 
ust 


where & is the specific inductive capacity of the dielectric (enamel), 
In is the natural logarithm, 
is the outer radius of dielectric, 


is radius of the conductor, in the same units as 7,, and 


2 


Ah is the change in water height in cm. 


The total capacitance presented by the gaging element is of secondary interest only, 
as this capacitance may be considered as a part of the fixed capacitor in the bridge arm in 
which the gage is connected. 

Formula [1], although exact, should be used to obtain approximate values only, owing 
to the difficulty of accurately measuring the thickness of the insulation on the wire and de- 
termining the dielectric constant # of the insulating material. For example, computed values 
for AC (uyf per in.) of the No. 28 enameled wire used was 58.5 pyf per in., while the average 
experimental value obtained by direct measurement was 56.0 yyf perin. (This value was 


used as a basis for selecting the internal calibrating condensers.) 


B. LINEARITY CONSIDERATIONS 


The degree of linearity obtainable from a conventional four-arm bridge is a function 
of the ratio of the maximum change in impedance which will occur in the active bridge arm 
and the impedance of the same arm at balance. 

The expression for the open circuit output voltage for a capacitive bridge with one 


active (variable) arm is 


volts [2] 


where e is the bridge driving voltage and a is the ratio of the change in capacitance of the 
active arm to the capacitance of the arm at balance, i.e., a. 

For example, in order to realize a linearity of one percent of full scale, the error 
2 
+o 


factor in Equation [2] must not be numerically less than 0.99. Or stated otherwise, the 


13 


ratio AC must not exceed 0.02. 


The range of the instrument described extends to 20 in. of water (single peak amplitude), 
The ratio 42 for this largest amplitude is approximately 0.012 so that the bridge nonlinearity 
does not exceed 0.6 percent of full scale on this sensitivity setting and is considerably less 


for the measurement of smaller wave amplitudes. 


REFERENCES 


> 
(2) —>1. ‘‘An Ocean Wave Measuring Instrument,’’ Technical Memorandum No. 6, Beach Erosion 
Board, U.S. Army Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss., October 1948. 


2. Chinn, A.J., ‘‘Progress Report on Wave Measurements at Apra Harbor, Guam,’’ Univer- 
sity of California Department of Engineering Report No. HE-152-2, 5 July 1949. 


8. Cook, G.W., ‘‘A Resonant-Bridge Carrier System for the Measurement of Minute Changes 
in Capacitance,’’ TMB Report 626, February 1951, 


et Ag WA i ‘pede 
‘eee Hits 


a ithe aa » 


Died 


mn 


Ny ee ae 
Thole? Aowse a ymimentirh inionedh Lae lean 

is yy bh ahh funas 
ey BORE 


vil 
eR rat + ohm Fel 4 


\ MPR AMD RGU ED Lk 


Gut Beet iyi F 
( * s 
‘ : Pan ‘ 7 Ree ta DO is Yh) aki ae 
: we ag tia AY NTE ‘ tinh Goh RPS att 
y A *) i a 
iL y ; k 
i ant 
v4 ‘ty 
" a } i u 
i ti TaD | i Hekevh 
| 
‘4 f ‘ 
i; 
; Ff 
les 
’ ra i 
ihe 
%’ 
. a" 
eet i i 
( / af a f 
: j aan x oa ‘ 
vs \ { i , a 
Pals as i} J 1 


Copies 


NAVY-OPPO PRNC, WASH. OC 


15 


INITIAL DISTRIBUTION 


Chief, Bureau of Ships, Technical Library (Code 327), for distribution: 
5 Technical Library 
1 Applied Science (Code 370) 
2 Electronics Design and Development (Code 810) 
1 Civilian Consultant to Chief of the Bureau (Code 106) 


Director, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington 20, D.C. 


Commanding Officer and Director, Naval Electronics Laboratory, San Diego 52, 
Calif. 


Commander, U.S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory, White Oak, Silver Spring 19, Md. 


Commanding Officer and Director, U.S. Navy Underwater Sound Laboratory, Fort 
Trumbull, New London, Conn., Attn: Mr. Whannel 


Commander, Norfolk Naval Shipyard (Code 227), Underwater Explosion Research 
Field Unit, Norfolk, Va. 


Director, National Bureau of Standards, Wash., D.C., Attn: Office of Basic 
Instrumentation, 1 for Dr. T.A. Perls 


Director, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Department of Commerce, Washington, 
D.C. 


Beach Erosion Board, U.S. Army Engineers, Little Falls Road and MacArthur 
Blvd., N.W., Washington, D.C. 


Director, Experimental Towing Tank, Stevens Institute of Technology, 711 Hudson 
St., Hoboken, N.J. 


Director, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Mass. 


Director, St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minne- 
apolis, Minn. 


Dr. Dennison Bancroft, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pa. 


British Joint Services Mission (Navy Staff), P.O. Box 165, Benjamin Franklin 
Station, Washington 25, D.C. 


Canadian Joint Staff, 1700 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington 6, D.C. 


"S SUIEM ‘ifeqdwep *f 

SQUOUINSUL SuLNseoW °Z 
seolAep 

SUIPIODOY - SOABM *T 


*pesn 
AjAOUIOJ OJEM YOIYA Sonbruyoe} 19y0 peoedes sey 41 ‘peqiiosep 
uolyezueUNsysuI oy} Aq pepsojye AqI{IqQIxe]j pues Aovinooe pesvesd 

-UI 91} JO osnuseg ‘Aioxe1Oqey] solusyoouospAH ey jo ysenb 

-01 04) 18 ‘UISug [epoW JOA T, pIABd OY} JO UOISIAIG sUlIcouIsUG 

DTUONDETY OY} JO YOuBIg JueWdoeAeq 4INdITD oIUONDeTq O47 Aq 


podojeAep sem UOTyezUEUINSUI SINT, “S@ABM 107BM JO SUNOJ CABM 
pus sopnqiijdiue evem oy} Suipsiooe pus Sulinsvoul 10} uo1yezUEW 
|-NajSUI MoU JO Seinzeoy quoITes oY} ATJol1q SeqIiosep y40des SIyy, 
daldissvTONA 


*sjoa “sa1y "your ‘d gp ‘tt 
“E961 10q0700 ‘uoysuLYseM “jJeqdweD *s*M Aq 

‘SQLVUVddV DNIMASVAN LHDIGH-GAVM OINOULOGTA NV 
"698 “Jdey “uIseg [epoy~ JOyABT, *M plAeq 


"S SITITM ‘Tleqdwep *y 

SJUOUINIYSUI SULINSvEW °Z 
seorAep 

BUIPIOIOY - SOABM "T 


*posn 
AyJOUIOJ eJOM YOTYM Sonbiuyoe} 10430 peowjdei sey 31 Speqiiosep 
uoreszuewnysut oy} Aq popsojye AqI[IqQIxeT] pus Aovinoov pesveo 

-Ul oy} JO osnuoeg *AJoyBI1OqeT] SoruBYy.eUOIpAY] ey} Jo ysenb 

-01 oy} 38 ‘UISBG [OPOW JOTABT, pIAv ey} JO WOISIAIG SulieouIsug 
DTUOIDETY oy) JO youvig yuoudojoaeq yINoIIg d1u0I1}007q eyy Aq 

pedojoAep SBA UOI}BQUEWNIISUL STYT, *"SOABM JOZVM JO SUMO] CABAL 
pue sopnzljdue oABM oy) SuIpsooed pus Sulinsvoul 10} uOTZeIUEU 

-“NaJSUL MOU JO SOINjBey QUOITVS oY} ATJotIq Sequosep qodes STyT, 

GaI4ISSVTONN 
*syoa “sSty "jour *d op “Ut 
“EQ6T Jeqo}0Q ‘uoysuryseA “[TeqdWuBD *s*\ Aq 
‘SALVUVddV DNINASVAN LHOIGH-GAVM OINOULOUTA NV 
"698 “qdoy “uIseg [epow JO[ABT, “4 PlABG 


“JOp10001 SUTIIM 
Jo9llp WiOqUEs ¥ Ul 1eJeWOUBAed SUIpIOIeI OY} BUIATIp 103 o]qzzINs selyITdue pojdnoa-3oex1p 
@ pue ‘Ajddns aemod sq1 ‘queunaysut 94} Jo sweideip FuraIm oNeueEyos SOpN[oul ysodes sty, 
“Opsoded JYS{eY-9ABM OY} JO JMOITO BY} UI pezeIodsooU! yMoIIO JOB] Npowep eATIS 
“ues esvyd [euorueAUOd sso] 10 e10Ul v Aq peseAOde. ST eguE[EquN Jo UOTOeIIp ey) pus ‘osuas 
yoo Url agptaq O-8 64} Jo eouEyequn OATyIORdeo oonpoid queweye Sulsed ay} ssed seavm se 
IND9O YOIYM JYSlOy 1OIVM UL SUOIVBIIBA *J0]¥M OY} JO [eAe] qUooSainb ay} 10y peoueyeq oq Kew 
YOu “QINoI1o SSpliq-yuBUOse1 B JO Wie euO UI peyoeuUOd SI 10}IORVdvo SI, ‘o4TM OY} Jo UOTIIOd 
pesieuqns 94} jo yysue] aweUr] ey 07 [euoNs0doad A}joeIIp si (sey pus 20JONpUoD ey UeEeAjeq 
peiNsBell) ,,lesuepuod,, Sty} jo Aylowdvo oyy, *10j10¥dwo ey Jo OI4OeTSIP Oy} SUIIOy EITM OT} 
UO [BiiojVUl UOWBINSUL O49 1eyjO OY SB Sjoe pediowgns Ay[eIWIed ST yUoUeTe Suises oy Yorum 
Ul 1e}8M ey} puw 1o}IoRded v Jo aye¥jd eUO Sz sjo" IOJONpUOD oY, *107BM Oy) UT WYyStadn Aypists 
pepuedsns “ert peyeTNSUT [TUS ATeuler;Xe jo sysIsuOD WeysAs STH} Jo quewleTe SuIses oyy, 


*Jopsooes BuLITM 
oellp WoOquBs ¥ UT JoJoWOUBATeS SUIpiode1 oy) BUIATIp Joy ofqeyIns setT{due pejdnoo-qoe1Ip 
® pue ‘Ajddns seMod sqi ‘queunsysut ey) Jo swesseIp SuiIM o1yeuoyos sepnzour ysodas sIyL 
“JOPIOISI JYSTOY-OABM OY} JO JINoITo oY UT poyesodsooUl yINdII0 JOJe{Npowep OATS 
-ues esvyd [vUoTUEAUOD Sse] JO oJOUI B Aq poJOAOOI ST SoUBTeGQUN Jo UODEIIpP oY) pue ‘esues 
Yowe ul espliq o-v oy] Jo eouRpequn eArztoedvo sonposd queweTo SuIsed oy) ssud soaum se 
1N990 YOTYM FysTey JoyVM UT SUOTIBIIeA *J0]BM ay} JO [eAeT JUOSeINb oyj J0J peouvTeq oq Kew 
YoryM “moslo eSpraq-yueuosed & Jo Wie eUO UL poJOoUUOD SI JOJIO¥dRD STYY, ‘AIIM oY} Jo uoTyJod 
pesiougqns oy) jo yySue] wouty oy} 07 [BUoI0doid Apoes1p st (s97eM pue JoJONpuod et] ueemjoqg 
peinsveul) ,,Jesuepuod,, STyy Jo Aytoedvo yy, *x0j1oOudwo oY) Jo O14j0eTeIP oY} SuIIOy OIIM ayy 
UO [BL1oVU UOIRTNSUL oY} +JeYyjO oYy se Syoe padiougns AT]eQIed st quowo]e Fuses oy yorym 
UI 10]8M 9Y} pue 1oOjIOVdBo v Jo oyeTd GUO Sv SzoOR JOJONpUOD EY, “1e}eM OU} UT qystadn Ayprsta 
poepuedsns ‘oii peyeynsul [Tews AToulesyxe Jo Sysisuoo Weysks sity Jo juelieye Suises oy, 


Ny 


Mie 
LN 


Te a Te Sg z Si i a 
PERL aN MME he Re aR CL eM cad Te Ck © Ab ki 
f OREN cy t My vs ) Meas ea ( 
pes tala) EYEE 


ik