(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Encyclopaedia Of The Social Sciences Vol VIII"

THE BOOK WAS 
DRENCHED 



CO 

u< OU_1 68355 >m 

CO 



Encyclopaedia 



of the 

SOCIAL 
SCIENCES 



EDITOR- IN -CHIEF 

EDWINR.A.SEUGMAN 

ASSOCIATE EDITOR 

ALVIN JOHNSON 



VOLUME EIGHT 

INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 
LABOR TURNOVER 



MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD. 
MCMXXXII LONDON 



EDITORIAL STAFF 



EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 

EDWIN R.A.SELIGMAN 

McVickar Professor Emeritus of Political Economy in Residence, Columbia University; 
LL.B , Ph D. and LL.D ; Hon. D., University of Paris and Heidelberg University; Cor- 
responding Member of the Institut de France; Member of the Accadetnia del Lincei, of 
the Russian Academy of Science, of the Norwegian Academy of Science, of the 
Cuban Academy of Political and Social Science and of the Accademia dell* Scienze 
Morah e Politiche; Laureat of the Belgian Academy of Science, Foreign Correspondent 
of the Royal Economic Society; Ex-President of the American Economic Association, 
of the National Tax Association and of the American Association of University Professor* 



ASSOCIATE EDITOR 

ALVIN JOHNSON, PH. D. 

Director of the New School for Social Research 



ASSISTANT EDITORS 

LEWIS COREY 
IDA CRAVEN 
LOUIS M. HACKER 
SOLOMON KUZNETS 
MAX LERNER 
EDWIN MIMS, JR. 
FLORENCE MISHNUN 



KOPPEL S. PINSON 
NATHAN REICH 
WILLIAM SEAGLE 
JOSEPH J. SENTURIA 
HERBERT SOLOW 
BERNHARD J. STERN 
HELEN SULLIVAN 



ELIZABETH TODD 



ADVISORY EDITORS 



American 



Anthropology 
A. L. KROEBER 

Economics 

EDWIN F. GAY 
JACOB II. HOLLANDER 
E. G. NOURSE 

Education 
PAUL MONROE 

History 
SIDNEY B. FAY 

A. M. SCIILESINGER 

Law_ 
ROSCOE POUND 



Philosophy 
JOHN DEWEY 

Political Science 

CHARLES A. BEARD 
FRANK J. GOODNOW 

Psychology 
FLOYD H. ALLPORT 

Social Work 
PORTER R. LEE 

Sociology 

WILLIAM F. OGBURN 
W. I. THOMAS 

Statistics 

IRVING FISHER 
WALTER F. WILLCOX 



England 

ERNEST BARKER 
J. M. KEYNES 
SIR JOSIAH STAMP 
R. H. TAWNEY 

France 
CHARLES RIST 

F. SlMIAND 



Foreign 



Germany 

CARL BRINKMANN 
II. SCHUMACHER 

Italy 
LUIGI ElNAUDI 

AUGUSTO GRAZIANI 

Switzerland 
W. E. RAPPARD 



CONSTITUENT SOCIETIES 

AND 

JOINT COMMITTEE 



AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 

ROBERT H. LOWIE AND CLARK WISSLER 

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS 

PHILIP KLEIN AND STUART A. QUEEN 

AMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION 

CLIVE DAY AND FRANK A. FETTER 

AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION 

CARL BECKER AND CLARENCE H. HARING 

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION 

WILLIAM 13. MUNRO AND JOHN II. LOGAN 

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 

GEORGINA S. GATES AND MARK A. MAY 

AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL SOCIETY 

KIMBALL YOUNG AND R. M. MAC!VER 

AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION 

MARY VAN KLEECK AND R. H. COATS 

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN LAW SCHOOLS 

EDWIN W. PATTERSON AND EDWIN D. DICKINSON 

NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION 

E. L. TlIORNDIKE AND J. A. C. CHANDLER 



BOARD OF DIRECTORS 



FRANZ BOAS 
WALTER WHEELER COOK 
JOHN DEWEY 
JOHN A. FAIRLIE 



Academic 

CARLTON J. H. HAYES 
JACOB H. HOLLANDER 
ALVIN JOHNSON 
WESLEY C. MITCHELL 
JOHN K NORTON 



HOWARD B. WOOLSTON 
EDWIN R. A. SELIGMAN 
MARY VAN KLEECK 
MARGARET FLOY WASHBURN 



JAMES COUZENS 
THOMAS W. LAMONT 



Lay 



JOHN J. RASKOB 
ROBERT E. SIMON 
JESSE I. STRAUS 



SILAS H. STRAWN 
OWEN D. YOUNG 



CONTRIBUTORS TO VOLUME EIGHT 



Albright, W. F. 

Johns Hopkins University 
Auburtin, Jean 

Paris 
Ayres, Kdith 

New York University 

Babinger, Franz 

University of Berlin 
Barnes, Harry E. 

. New York City 
Baron, Salo 

Columbia University 
Bates, M. Searle 

University of Nanking 
Baynes, Norman II. 

University of London 
Beard, Mary R. 

New Mi If or d, Connecticut 
Becker, Carl 

Cornell University 
Bernaldo de Quiros, C. 

Madrid 
Bernard, L. L. 

Washington University 
Bleuler, Eugen 

Zollikon, Switzerland 
Boehm, Max Hildebert 

Institut fur Grenz- und Ausland- 

studien, Berlin 
Bogen, Jules I. 

New York University 
Bonn, Moritz Julius 

Handels-Hochschule, Berlin 
Borchard, Edwin M. 

Yale University 
Brailsford, H. N. 

London 
Braucr, Thcodor 

University of Cologne 
Braun, Robert 

Budapest 
Breckinridge, S. P. 

University of Chicago 
Briefs, G. 

Technische Hochschule, 
Berlin 



Brinkmann, Carl 

University of Heidelberg 
Brinton, Crane 

Harvard University 
Brissenden, Paul F. 

Columbia University 
Brunschvicg, Leon 

University of Paris 
Buck, Solon J. 

Western Pennsylvania Historical 

Survey , Pit tsb urgh 
Buell, Raymond Leslie 

Foreign Policy Association, 

New York City 
Bujak, Franciszek 

University of Lwow 
Buonaiuti, Ernesto 

University of Rome 
Burns, Arthur Robert 

Columbia University 
Burns, E. M. 

Columbia University 

Carlylc, A. J. 

University of Oxford 
Carrier, E. H. 

London 
Cassirer, Ernst 

University of Hamburg 
Chafee, Zcchariah, Jr. 

Harvard University 
Chalupny, Emmanuel 

Svobodna Skola Politickych Nauk, 

Prague 
Chamberlain, J. P. 

Columbia University 
Chandler, Lester V. 

New Haven, Connecticut 
Chubinsky, M. 

University of Subotica, Jugoslavia 
Clarkson, Jesse Dunsmore 

Brooklyn College 
Clayton, Joseph 

Bilhngshurst, Sussex, England 
Coats, R. H. 

Dominion Bureau of Statistics , 
Canada 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



Cobban, Alfred 

University of Durham at Newcastle" 

upon-Tyne 
Cole, G. D. H. 

University of Oxford 
Collinet, Paul 

University of Paris 
Commons, John R. 

University of Wisconsin 
Corey, Lewis 

Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 
Corwin, Edward S. 

Princeton University 
Coupland, R. 

University of Oxford 
Curti, Merle E. 

Smith College 

Daszynska-Golinska, Zofia 

Free University of Warsaw 
Davis, Horace B. 

New York City 
Diehl, Charles 

University of Paris 
Diehl, Karl 

University of Freiburg i. Br. 
Douglas, Paul H. 

University of Chicago 
Dub now, Simon 
^Berlin 

Edie, Lionel D. 

New York City 
Elbogen, Ismar 

Hochschule fur die Wissenschaft des 

Judentums, Berlin 
Emin, Ahmet 

Istanbul 
Eulenberg, Franz 

Handels-Hochschule, Berlin 

Fay, Sidney B. 

Harvard University 
Fellner, FredeVic de 

University of Budapest 
Fitch, John A. 

New York School of Social Work 
Flexner, Jean Atherton 

Swarthmore, Pennsylvania 
Ford, Grace 

Southampton, England 
Ford, Percy 

University College , Southampton 
Foster, Roger S. 

Yale University 



Frankfurter, Felix 

Harvard University 
Fraser, Lindley M. 

University of Oxford 
Freund, Paul A. 

Cambridge^ Massachusetts 
Fritzsche, Hans 

University of Zurich 
Fuchs, Ralph F. 

Washington University 

Galitzi, Christine 

Scripps College 
Galloway, George B. 

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 
Gamio, Manuel 

Mexico City 
Gehrig, Hans 

Technische Hochschule \ Dresden 
Gelesnoff, V. 

Moscow 
Ghoshal, U. N. 

Calcutta University 
Gillespie, Frances E. 

University of Chicago 
Giusti, Roberto 

Buenos Aires 
Givens, Meredith 

Social Science Research Council , 

New York City 
Glueck, Sheldon 

Harvard University 
Goetz, Walter 

University of Leipsic 
Greene, Nathan 

Harvard University 
Groethuysen, Bernhard 

University of Berlin 
Grotkopp, Wilhelm 

Berlin 
Gurian, Waldemar 

Bonn 
Gurvitch, Georges 

Paris 
Gutmann, Franz 

University of Gottingen 

Hale, Robert L. 

Columbia University 
Hamilton, Walton H. 

Yak University 
Hanbury, H. G. 

University of Oxford 
Handman, Max Sylvius 

University of Michigan 



Contributors to Volume Eight 



XI 



Hardman, J. B. S. 

Neto York City 
Haring, Clarence H. 

Harvard University 
Hauser, Henri 

University of Paris 
Heaton, Herbert 

University of Minnesota 
Hedemann, J. Wilhelm 

University of Jena 
Heller, Hermann 

University of Berlin 
Himes, Norman E. 

Somerville, Massachusetts 
Hippel, Ernst von 

University of Kdnigsberg 
Hocart, A. M. 

London 
Hofmeyr, Jan H. 

Pretoria, South Africa 
HruSevsky, M. 

Academic des Sciences d* Ukraine, 

Kiev 
Hu Shih 

National University of Peking 
Hudson, Manley O. 

Harvard University 
Hugelmann, Karl Gottfried 

University of Vienna 
Hummel, Arthur W. 

Library of Congress 

Jackh, Ernst 

Deutsche Hochschule fur Politik, 

Berlin 
Jacob, E. F. 

University of Manchester 
Jdszi, Oscar 

Oberlin College 
Jenks, Leland H. 

Wellesley College 
Jevons, H. Stanley 

London 
Jokl, Norbert 

University of Vienna 
Jones, Eliot 

Stanford University 
Jones, J. D. Rheinallt 

South African Institute of Race 
Relations, Johannesburg 

Kallen, Horace M. 

New School for Social Research 
Kanellopoulos, Panajotis 

University of Athens 



Kaplan, A. D. H. 

University of Denver 
Kawakami, Kiyoshi K. 

Washington, D. C. 
Kehr, Eckart 

Deutsche Hochschule fiir Politik, 

Berlin 
Kiese wetter, A. A. 

Russian Faculty of Law, Prague 
Kirkaldy, A. W. 

University College, Nottingham 
Knight, Frank H. 

University of Chicago 
Kocharovsky, K. 

Belgrade 
Kohn, Hans 

Jerusalem 
Koht, Halvdan 

University of Oslo 
Kosters, J. 

Hooge Road, Netherlands 
Krzywicki, Ludwik 

University of Warsaw 
Kumaniecki, Kazimierz W. 

University of Cracow 
Kurkjian, V. M. 

New York City 
Kuznets, Solomon 

Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 

Langer, William L. 

Harvard University 
Laski, Harold J. 

London School of Economics and 

Political Science 
Laslowski, Ernst 

Beuthen, Germany 
Laur, Ernst 

Eidgenossische Technische Hoch- 
schule, Zurich 
Lederer, Emil 

University of Heidelberg 
Lescure, Jean 

University of Paris 
Lowie, Robert H. 

University of California 
Lundberg, George A. 

Columbia University 
Lybyer, Albert H. 

University of Illinois 

MacDonald, William 

New York City 
Maclver, R. M. 

Columbia University 



Xll 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



McPhee, E. T. 

Hobart, Tasmania 
Manes, Alfred 

University of Berlin 
Marsh, Margaret Alexander 

Smith College 
Matl, Josef 

University of Graz 
Mayer, Gustav 

University of Berlin 
Means, Gardiner C. 

Columbia University 
Meeker, Royal 

New Haven 
Meyers, Norman L. 

Federal Power Commission 
Michels, Roberto 

University of Perugia 
Millar, Robert W. 

Northwestern University 
Miller, Nathan 

Carnegie Institute of Technology , 

Pittsburgh 
Miliukov, Paul 

Paris 
Mishnun, Florence 

Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 
Mondolfo, Rodolfo 

University of Bologna 
Montgomery, J. A. 

University of Pennsylvania 
Mowbray, A. H. 

University of California 
Munro, William B. 

Pasadena, California 
Murray, Robert H. 

Persh ore , Worcestershire , 
England 

Neff, Wanda Fraiken 

New York City 
Nevins, Allan 

Columbia University 
Nixon, H. C. 

Tulane University 

Olmstead, A. T. 

University of Chicago 
Opie, Redvers 

University of Oxford 
Otto, M. C. 

University of Wisconsin 

Palm, Franklin C. 

University of California 



Patterson, Edwin W. 

Columbia University 
Peardon, Thomas P. 

Columbia University 
Perlman, Selig 

University of Wisconsin 
Person, II . S. 

Taylor Society, New York City 
Peters, Hans 

University of Berlin 
Pirou, Gae"tan 

University of Parts 
Plummer, W. C. 

University of Pennsylvania 
Popovic, Dusan J. 

University of Belgrade 
Postgate, R. W. 

London 
Potter, Pitman B. 

University of Wisconsin 
Pound, Roscoe 

Harvard University 
Power, Eileen 

London School of Economics and 

Political Science 
Pribram, Karl 

University of Frankfort 
Price, Frank Wilson 

Nanking Theological Seminary 
Procopovicz, S. 

Prague 
Pugliese, Salvatore 

Milan 

Radin, Max 

University of California 
Rappoport, Charles 

Paris 
Rawidowicz, S. 

Berlin 
Rees, J. F. 

University College of South Wales 

and Monmouthshire 
Robinson, Leland Rex 

New York City 
Rogers, James Harvey 

Yale University 
Rogers, Lindsay 

Columbia University 
Rose, William J. 

Dartmouth College 
Rosenberg, Vladimir 

Prague 
Roth, Cecil 

London 



Contributors to Volume Eight 



xm 



Sadler, Michael E. 

University of Oxford 
Salin, Edgar 

University of Basel 
Sanborn, Frederic Rockwell 

New York City 
Schacht, Joseph 

University of Konigsberg 
Schapera, I. 

University of Cape Town 
Schiller, A. Arthur 

Columbia University 
Schnabel, Franz 

Technische Jlochschule, 

Karhruhe 
Scholz, Richard 
* University of Leipsic 
Schuman, Frederick L. 

University of Chicago 
Seagle, William 

Encyclopaedia of the Social 

Sciences 
See, Henri 

University of Rennes 
Sentnria, Joseph J. 

Encyi lopacdia of the Social 

Sciences 
Sharfman, I. L. 

University of Michigan 
Shatzky, Jacob 
, Yiddisher Vissenshaftlicher 
Institut, American 
Section, New York 

City 
Shultz, William J. 

New York City 
Sisic, Ferdo 

University of Zagreb 
Skalkowski, A. M. 

University of Poznan 
Smend, Rudolf 

University of Berlin 
Smith, Chester H. 

University of Arizona 
Smurlo, E. 

Societe Historique Russe, 

Prague 
Sommer, Franz 

Munich 
Sommer, Ixxiise 

University of Geneva 
Spektorski, E. 

University of Ljubljana 
Stadelmann, Rudolf 

University of Freiburg i. Br. 



Steenhoff, Frida 

Stockholm 
Steinen, Wolfram von den 

University of Basel 
Stern, Bernhard J. 

Encyclopaedia of tlie Social 

Sciences 
Sternberg, Theodor 

Tsujido, Japan 
Sudhoff, Karl 

University of Leipsic 
Surdnyi-Unger, Theo 

Francis Joseph University , 

Szeged, Hungary 
Szel, Theodore 

Budapest 

Taranovsky, Theodor 

University of Belgrade 
Taylor, A. Wellington 

New York University 
Tippett, Tom 

Brookwood I^bor College 
Tsunoda, Ryusaku 

Columbia University 

Valters, M. 

Riga 
Vdmbery, Rusztem 

Budapest 
Van Buren, George H. 

New York City 
Van Waters, Miriam 

Juvenile Court, Los Angeles 
Vasiliev, A. A. 

University of Wisconsin 
Vesey- Fitzgerald, Seymour 

University of London 
Viner, Jacob 

University of Chicago 
Vogel, Walther 

University of Berlin 

Warne, Colston E. 

Amherst College 
Watjen, Hermann 

University of Munster 
Weill, Georges 

University of Caen 
Wendel, Hermann 

Frankfort 
Wesley, Charles H. 

Howard University 
Wiese, Helmut 

Hamburg 



xiv Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 

Wiest, Edward Wooddy, Carroll H. 

University of Kentucky University of Chicago 

Wilson, Francis G. Wright, Helen R. 

University of Washington University of Chicago 

Winfield, Percy H. 

University of Cambridge Young, George 
Witte, Edwin E. Cookham t Berkshire, 

Legislative Reference Division, England 

Madison 

Wohlhaupter, Eugen Zulueta, F. de 

University of Munich University of Oxford 



CONTENTS 



Contributors to Volume Eight 
Articles 

INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 

INDUSTRIAL UNIONISM 

INDUSTRIAL WORKERS OF THE WORLD 

INDUSTRIALISM 

INFANT MORTALITY 

INFANTICIDE 

INFECTIOUS DISEASES, CONTROL OF 

INFLATION AND DEFLATION 

INGENIEROS, JOSE 

INGERSOLL, ROBERT GREEN 

INGRAM, JOHN KELLS 

INHERITANCE 

INHERITANCE TAXATION 

INITIATION 

INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM 

INJUNCTION 

INLAND WATERWAYS 

INNOCENT III 

INNOVATION 

INQUISITION 

INSANITYCRIMINAL LAW 

CIVIL LAW 
INSPECTION 
INSTALMENT SELLING 
INSTINCT 
INSTITUTION 
INSTITUTIONS, PUBLIC 
INSURANCE 

PRINCIPLES AND HISTORY 

INDUSTRY 

LAW AND REGULATION 
INSURGENCY, POLITICAL 
INSURRECTION 
INTEGRATION, INDUSTRIAL 
INTELLECTUALS 
INTELLIGENCE 
INTENT, CRIMINAL 
INTERALLIED DEBTS 

INTEREST 



IX 



Herbert Heaton 
See TRADE UNIONS 

Paul F. Brissenden 

G. D. H. Cole 

See CHILD, section on CHILD 
MORTALITY 

A.M.Hocart 

See COMMUNICABLE DISEASES, 
CONTROL OF 

James Harvey Rogers and 
Lester V. Chandler 

C. Bernaldo de Quiros 

Harry E. Barnes 

Lindley M. Fraser 

G. D. H. Cole 

William J. Shultz 

Nathan Miller 

William B. Munro 

Zechariah Chafee, Jr. 
See WATERWAYS, INLAND 

E.F.Jacob 

Horace M. Kallen 

E.F.Jacob 

Sheldon Glueck 

Edwin W. Patterson 

Edith Ayres 

W. C. Plummer 

L.L. Bernard 

Walton H. Hamilton 

S. P. Breckinridge 

Alfred Manes 

A . H. Mowbray 

Edwin W. Patterson 

Lindsay Rogers 

Frederick L. Schuman 
See COMBINATIONS, INDUSTRIAL 

Roberto Michels 
See MENTAL TESTS 

Max Radin 

See LOANS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL; 
REPARATIONS 

Frank H. Knight 



XVI 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



INTERESTS 

INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 
INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES 
INTERMARRIAGE 
INTERMEDIATE CREDIT BANKS 
INTERNAL REVENUE TAXES 
INTERNATIONAL ADVISERS 
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS 
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 
INTERNATIONAL, COMMUNIST 
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE 
INTERNATIONAL LABOR ORGANIZATION 
INTERNATIONAL LAW 
INTERNATIONAL LEGISLATION 
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION 
INTERNATIONAL PAYMENTS, BALANCE OF 

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 
INTERNATIONAL, SOCIALIST 
INTERNATIONAL TRADE INSTITUTIONAL 

FRAMFWORK 
THEORY 

INTERNATIONAL WATERWAYS 
INTERNATIONALISM 
INTERNMENT 
INTERPELLATION 
INTERSTATE COMMERCE UNITED STATES 

OTHER FEDERAL STATES 

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION 
INTERSTATE COMPACTS 
INTERVENTION 
INTESTACY 

INTIMIDATION 

INTOLERANCE 

INTRANSIGENCE 

INVALIDITY INSURANCE 

INVENTION 

INVESTIGATIONS, GOVERNMENTAL 

INVESTITURE CONFLICT 

INVESTMENT 

INVESTMENT BANKING 

INVESTMENT TRUSTS 

IONESCU, TAKE 

IRISH QUESTION 

IRNERIUS 

IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY 

GENERAL 

LABOR CONDITIONS 
United States 
Other Countries 



R. M. Maclver 
See LOANS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL 

Gardiner C. Means 

BernhardJ. Stern 
See FARM LOAN SYSTEM, FEDERAL 
See EXCISE 

Raymond Leslie Buett 
See AGREEMENTS, INTERNATIONAL 
See ARBITRATION, INTERNATIONAL 
See COMMUNIST PARTIES 

Moritz Julius Bonn 

Francis G. Wilson 

Edwin M. Borchard 

Manlcy O. Hudson 

Pitman B. Potter 
See BALANCE OF TRADE; INTER- 
NATIONAL FINANCE 

George Young 
See SOCIALISM; LABOR MOVEMENT 

Franz Eulenberg 

Jacob Viner 

J. P. Chamberlain 

II . N. Bradford 
See ENEMY ALIKN; NEUTRALITY 

Lindsay Rogers 

Felix Frankfurter and Paul 
A. Freund 

Jowph J. Senluria 

I. L. Sharfman 
See COMPACTS, INTERSTATE 

Percy If. Wmfield 
See INHHUTANCE; SUCCESSION, 
LAWS OF 

J. B. S. Hardman 

M. C. Otto 

Horace M. Kallen 
See HEALTH INSURANCE; OLD AGE 

Carl Brinkmann 

George B. Galloway 

A.J.Carlyle 

Lionel D. Edie 

Jules I. Bogen 

Leland Rex Robinson 

Christine Galitzi 

Jesse Dunsmore Clarkson 

A. Arthur Schiller 

Meredith Givens 

Colston E. Warm 
Horace B. Davis 



IRREDENTISM 



Max Hildebert Boehm 



Contents 

IRRIGATION 

ISABELLA OF CASTILE 

ISELIN, ISAAK 

ISIDORE OF SEVILLE 

ISLAM 

ISLAMIC LAW 

ISMAIL KEMAL BEY 

ISMAY, THOMAS HENRY 

ISOLATION 

ISOLATION, DIPLOMATIC 

ITAGAKI, COUNT TAISUKE 

ITO, PRINCE HIROBUMI 

IVAN IV 

IVO OF CHARTRES 

IXTLILXOCHITL, FERNANDO DE ALVA 

IZVOLSKY, ALEXANDER PETROVICH 

JABAVU, JOHN TENGO 

J ACINI, STEFANO FRANCESCO 

JACKSON, ANDREW 

JACOBINISM 

JACOBS, JOSEPH 

JACOBUS 

JACOBY, JOHANN 

JAHN, FRIEDRICH LUDWIG 

JAKOB; LUDWIG HEINRICH VON 

JAKSIC, VLADIMIR 

JAMAL U'D DIN AL-AFGHANI 

JAMES I 

JAMES OF VITERBO 

JAMES, WILLIAM 

JAMESON, ANNA BROWNELL 

JANET, PAUL 

JANNET, CLAUDIO 

JANSENISM 

JANSSEN, JOHANNES 

JAPANESE IMMIGRATION 

JAR VIS, EDWARD 

JASTROW, MORRIS 

JAURES, JEAN 

JAVID, MAHMAD 

JAWORSKI/WLADYSLAW LEOPOLD 

JAY, JOHN 

JEFFERSON, THOMAS 

JEKELFALUSSY, JOZSEF 

JELACIC, COUNT JOSIP 

JELLINEK, GEORG 

JENKIN, HENRY CHARLES FLEEMING 

JENKINS, SIR LEOLINE 

JENKINSON, CHARLES 

JENNER, EDWARD 

JESSEL, SIR GEORGE 

JESUITS 

JEVONS, WILLIAM STANLEY 

JEWISH AUTONOMY 



XV11 

E. H. Carrier 
See FERDINAND V AND ISABELLA 

Louise Sommer 

Joseph Clayton 

Joseph Schacht 

Joseph Schacht 

Norbertjokl 

A. W. Kirkaldy 

Max Hildebert Boehm 

William L. Longer 

Ryusaku Tsunoda 

Kiyoshi K. Kawakami 

A. A. Kiesewetter 
See YVES OF CHARTRES 

Manuel Gamio 

Sidney B. Fay 

J. D. Rheinallt Jones 

Salvatore Pugliese 

William MacDonald 

Crane Brinton 

Cecil Roth 
See FOUR DOCTORS 

Gustav Mayer 

Franz Schnabel 

V. Gelesnoff 

Josef Mail 

Hans Kohn 

Harold J. Laski 

Richard Scholz 

Horace M. Kallen 

Wanda Fraiken Neff 

Ldon Brunschvicg 

Jean Auburtin 

Bernfiard Groethuysen 

Ernst Laslowski 
See ORIENTAL IMMIGRATION 

George A. Lundberg 

J. A. Montgomery 

Charles Rappoport 

Albert H. Lybyer 

Kazimierz W. Kumaniecki 

William MacDonald 

Carl Becker 

Frederic de Fellner 

Dusan J. Popovic 

Hermann Heller 

Redvers Opie 

Frederic Rockwell Sanborn 
See LIVERPOOL, FIRST EARL OF 

Bernhard J. Stern 

H. G. Hanbury 

Walter Goetz 

H. Stanley Jevons 

Simon Dubnow 



XVU1 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



JEWISH EMANCIPATION 
JEX-BLAKE, SOPHIA 
JHERING, RUDOLF VON 
JIHAD 

JIMUTAVAHANA 
JINGOISM 

JIRECEK, JOSEF KONSTANTIN 
JITTA, DANIEL JOSEPHUS 
JOACHIM OF FLORA 
JOHANN MORITZ 
JOHN DUNS SCOTUS 
JOHN QUIDORT OF PARIS 
JOHN OF SALISBURY 
JOHNSON, GEORGE 
JOHNSON, JOSEPH FRENCH 
JOHNSON, SAMUEL 
JOHNSON, TOM LOFTIN 
JOHNSTON, SIR HARRY HAMILTON 
JOINT COST 

JOINT STOCK COMPANY 
JOLY, CLAUDE 
JONES, ABSALOM 
JONES, ERNEST CHARLES 
JONES, LLOYD 
JONES, MARY 
JONES, RICHARD 
JONESCU, TAKE 
JORDAN, DAVID STARR 
JORG, JOSEPH EDMUND 
JOSEPH II 

JOSEPHUS, FLAVIUS 
JOST, ISAAC MARCUS 
JOURDAN, ALFRED 
JOURNALISM 

JOURNEYMEN'S SOCIETIES 
JOVELLANOS, CASPAR MELCHOR DE 
JOWETT, BENJAMIN 
JUAREZ, BENITO PABLO 
JUBAINVILLE, HENRI D'ARBOIS DE 
JUDAISM 
JUDD, ORANGE 
JUDGMENTS 

JUDICIAL INTERROGATION 
JUDICIAL PROCESS 
JUDICIAL REVIEW 
JUDICIARY 
JUGLAR, CLEMENT 
JULIANUS, FLAVIUS CLAUDIUS 
JULIANUS, SALVIUS 
JURIEU, PIERRE 
JURISDICTION 
JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES 
JURISPRUDENCE 

JURY ENGLAND AND THE UNITED STATES 
OTHER COUNTRIES 



Salo Baron 

Grace Ford 

J. Wilhelm Hedemann 

Franz Babinger 

Seymour Vesey-Fitzgerald 
See CHAUVINISM 

Josef Mail 

J. Kosters 

Ernesto Buonaiuti 

Hermann Wdtjen 
See DUNS SCOTUS, JOHN 

Richard Scholz 

E. F. Jacob 

R. H. Coats 

A. Wellington Taylor 

Alfred Cobban 

Carroll H. Wooddy 

LelandH.Jenks 
See COST; OVERHEAD COSTS 

Arthur Robert Burns 

Henri See 

Charles H. Wesley 

Frances E. Gillespie 

Percy Ford 

Tom Tippett 

E. M. Burns 
See IONESCU, TAKE 

Merle E. Curti 
Waldemar Gurian 
Rudolf Stadelmann 
Simon Dubnow 
Jacob Shatzky 
Gaetan Pirou 
Allan Nevins 
Henri Hauser 
C. Bernaldo de Quiros 
Michael E. Sadler 
Clarence H. Haring 
Paul Collinet 
Ismar Elbogen 
H. C. Nixon 
Robert W. Millar 
Florence Mishnun 
Walton H. Hamilton 
Edward S. Corwin 
Harold J.Laski 
Jean Lescure 
Norman H. Baynes 

F. de Zulueta 
Franklin C. Palm 
Roger S. Foster 

See DUAL UNIONISM 
Roscoe Pound 
Roscoe Pound 
William S eagle 



Contents 

JUS GENTIUM 

JUS NATURALE 

JUST PRICE 

JUSTI, HERMAN 

JUSTI, JOHANNES HEINRICH GOTTLOB VON 

JUSTICE 

JUSTICE, ADMINISTRATION OF 

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE 

JUSTINIAN I 

JUSTO, JUAN BAUTISTA 

JUVENILE COURTS 

JUVENILE DELINQUENCY AND JUVENILE 
COURTS 

KABLUKOV, NIKOLAY ALEKSEYEVICH 

KADLEC, KAREL 

KAGWA, APOLO 

KAHL, WILHELM 

KALLAY, BENI 

KAMAL MAHMAD NAMUK 

KAMIENSKli HENRYK MICHAL 

K'ANG YU-WEI 

KANKRIN, COUNT EGOR FRANZEVICH 

KANT, IMMANUEL 

KARADZIC, VUK STEVANOVIC 

KARAGEORGE, PETROVIC 

KARAMZIN, NIKOLAY MIKHAYLOVICH 

KARAVELOFF, LUBEN 

KAREYEV, NIKOLAY IVANOVICH 

KARISHEV, NIKOLAY ALEXANDROVICH 

KARL FRIEDRICH 

KARMAN, MOR 

KARO, JOSEPH BEN EPHRAIM 

KASIM AMIN 

KASKEL, WALTER 

KATKOV, MIKHAIL NIKIFOROVICH 

KAUFMAN, ALEXANDR ARKADIEVICH 

KAUTILYA 

KAUTZ, GYULA 

KAVELIN, KONSTANTIN DMITRIEVICH 

KAY-SHUTTLEWORTH, SIR JAMES 

KEARNEY, DENIS 

KEITH, MINOR COOPER 

KELETI, KAROLY 

KELLER, FRIEDRICH LUDWIG 

KELLEY, FLORENCE 

KELLEY, OLIVER HUDSON 

KELLEY, WILLIAM DARRAH 

KELLOGG, EDWARD 

KELLY, EDMOND 

KEMAL MEHMED NAMtJK 

KEMBLE, JOHN MITCHELL 

KEMPER, JERONIMO DE BOSCH 

KENT, JAMES 



XIX 

Max Rodin 
See NATURAL LAW 

Edgar Salin 

John R. Commons 

Louise Sommer 

Georges Gurvitch 

William Seagle 

Chester H. Smith 

Charles Diehl 

Roberto Giusti 

See JUVENILE DELINQUENCY AND 
JUVENILE COURTS 

Miriam Van Waters 

S. Procopovicz 

Theodor Taranovsky 

I. Schapera 

Rudolf Smend 

Robert Broun 

Ahmet Emin 

Franciszek Bujak 

HuShih 

Solomon Kuznets 

Ernst Cassirer 

Hermann Wendel 

Ferdo Sisic 

Paul Miliukov 

Josef Mail 

Paul Miliukov 

K. Kocharovsky 

Louise Sommer 

Helmut Wiese 

Salo Baron 

George Young 

Hans Peters 

Paul Miliukov 

K. Kocharovsky 

U. N. Ghoshal 

Theo Surdnyi-Unger 

Solomon Kuznets 

Michael E. Sadler 

Selig Perlman 

Margaret Alexander Marsh 

Theodore Sztl 

Hans Fritzsche 

Helen R. Wright 

Solon J. Buck 

A. D. H. Kaplan 

John R. Commons 

Lewis Corey 
See KAMAL MAHMAD NAMUK 

Thomas P. Peardon 
See BOSCH KEMPER, JERONIMO DE 

Norman L. Meyers 



XX 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



KETTELER, BARON WILHELM EMMANUEL VON 

KEUFER, AUGUSTS 

KEY, ELLEN 

KEYSER, RUDOLF JAKOB 

KHAMA 

KHMELNITSKY, BOHDAN 

KHOMYAKOV, ALEXEY STEPANOVICH 

KHRIMIAN, MUGURDICH 

KIDD, BENJAMIN 

KIDERLEN-WACHTER, ALFRED VON 

KIDO, TAKAYOSHI 

KINDERGARTEN 

KING, GREGORY 

KING, LEONARD WILLIAM 

KING, WILLIAM 

KING, WILLIAM ALEXANDER 

KINGSHIP 

KINGSLEY, CHARLES 

KINGSTON, CHARLES CAMERON 

KINSHIP 

KIRBY, JOHN, JR. 

KIRCHMANN, JULIUS HERMANN VON 

KIREYEVSKY, IVAN VASILYEVICH 

KIRK, SIR JOHN 

KISELEV, COUNT PAVEL DMITRIEVICH 

KISTYAKOVSKY, ALEXANDER FEDOROVICH 

KISTYAKOVSKY, BOGDAN ALEXANDROVICH 

KIUPRILI FAMILY 

KJELLEN, RUDOLF 

KLEIN, FRANZ 

KLUCHEVSKY, VASILYI OSSIPOVICH 

KNAPP, GEORG FRIEDRICH 

KNAPP, MARTIN AUGUSTINE 

KNAPP, SEAMAN ASAHEL 

KNIBBS, SIR GEORGE HANDLEY 

KNIES, KARL GUSTAV ADOLF 

KNIGHTS OF LABOR 

KNIGHTS OF ST. CRISPIN 



KNOW NOTHING PARTY 

KNOWLES, LILIAN CHARLOTTE ANNE 

KNOWLTON, CHARLES 

KNOX, JOHN 

KOCH, ROBERT 

KOGALNICEANU, MICHAIL 

KOHLER, JOSEPH 

KOLLAR, JAN 

KOLL&TAJ, HUGO 

KOLPING, ADOLPH 

KONARSKI, STANISLAW 

KOPRULU FAMILY 

KOPS, JACOB LEONARD DE BRUIJN 

KORAES, ADAMANTIOS 



G. Briefs 

Georges Weill 

Frida Steenhoff 

Halvdan Koht 

I. Schapera 

M. Hrusevsky 

Solomon Kuznets 

V. M. Kurkjian 

Harry E. Barnes 

Ernst Jdckh 

Kiyoshi K. Kawakami 
See PRESCHOOL EDUCATION 

J. F. Rees 

A. T. Olmstead 

R. W. Postgate 

George H. Van Buren 
See MONARCHY 

G. D. H. Cole 

Herbert Heaton 

Robert H. Lowie 

Jean Atherton Flexner 

Theodor Sternberg 

Solomon Kuznets 

R. Coupland 

A. A. Kiesewetter 

M. Chubinsky 

Georges Gurvitch 
See KOPRULU FAMILY 

Walther Vogel 

Karl Gottfried Hugelmann 

Paul Miliukov 

Franz Gutmann 

/. L, Sharfman 

Edward Wiest 

E. T. McPhee 

Hans Gehrig 

Mary R. Beard 
See LABOR MOVEMENT; LEATHER 

INDUSTRY 

See PARTIES, POLITICAL, section on 
UNITED STATES 

Eileen Power 

Norman E. Himes 

Robert H. Murray 

Karl Sudhoff 

Christine Galitzi 

William Seagle 

Emmanuel Chalupny 

Zofia Daszynska-Golinska 

Theodor Brauer 

William J. Rose 

Albert H. Lybyer 
See BRUIJN KOPS, JACOB LEONARD 
DE 

Panajotis Kanelhpoulos 



Contents 

KORAN 

KORKUNOV, NIKOLAY MIKHAYLOVICH 

KOROLENKO, VLADIMIR GALAKTIONOVICH 

KOROSY DE SZANTO, JOZSEF 

KOSCIUSZKO, TADEUSZ ANDRZEI 

KOSSUTH, LAJOS 

KOSTOMAROV, NIKOLAY IVANOVICH 

KOVACS, GABOR 

KOVALEVSKY, MAKSIM MAKSIMOVICH 

KRAEMER, ADOLF 

KRAEPELIN, EMIL 

KRAUS, CHRISTIAN JACOB 

KRAUS, FRANZ XAVER 

KRAUZ-KELLES, BARON KAZIMIERZ 

KREITTMAYR, BARON VON 

KREK, JANEZ 

KREMER, BARON ALFRED VON 

KREUGER, IVAR 

KRIZANIC, JURIJ 

KROCHMAL, NACHMAN 

KRONVALDS, ATTIS 

KROPOTK1N, PRINCE PETR ALEXEYEVICH 

KRUEGER, PAUL 

KRUGER, STEPHANUS JOHANNES PAULUS 

KRUMBACHER, KARL 

KRUPP, ALFRED 

KRUTTSCIINITT, JULIUS 

KU KLUX KLAN 

KU YEN-WU 

KUENEN, ABRAHAM 

KULIZHNY, ANDREY EVMENEVICH 

KULTURKREIS 

KUNFI, ZSIGMOND 

KUOMINTANG 



LABAND, PAUL 

LA BOETIE, ETIENNE DE 

LABOR 

LABOR BANKING 

LABOR BLACKLIST 

LABOR-CAPITAL COOPERATION 

LABOR COLLEGES 

LABOR CONTRACT 

LABOR DISPUTES 

LABOR EXCHANGE BANKS 

LABOR EXCHANGES 

LABOR, GOVERNMENT SERVICES FOR 

LABOR INJUNCTION 

LABOR LEGISLATION AND LAW 

LABOR LEGISLATION 
LABOR LAW 

Anglo-American 

Continental 



XXI 

See SACRED BOOKS 

Georges Gurvitch 

Vladimir Rosenberg 

Theodore Sze'l 

A. M. Skalkowski 

Oscar Jdszi 

M. Hrusevsky 

Rusztem Vdmbery 

E. Spektorski 

Ernst Laur 

Eugen Bleuler 

Karl Pribram 

Wolfram von den Steinen 

Ludwik Krzywicki 

Eugen Wohlhaupter 

Hermann Wendel 

Franz Babinger 

Wilhelm Grotkopp 

E. Smurlo 

S. Rawidowicz 

M. Valters 

Rodolfo Mondolfo 

Franz Sommer 

Jan H. Hofmeyr 

A. A. Vasiliev 

Eckart Kehr 

Eliot Jones 

Max Sylvius Handman 

Arthur W. Hummel 

W. F. Albright 

S. Procopovicz 
See DIFFUSION ISM 

Oscar Jdszi 

M. Searle Bates and Frank 
Wilson Price 

Ernst von Hippel 

Oscar Jdszi 

Emil Lederer 

J. B. S. Hardman 
See BLACKLIST, LABOR 

J. B, S. Hardman 
See WORKERS' EDUCATION 

Ralph F. Fuchs 

John A . Fitch 

Karl Diehl 
See EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGES 

Royal Meeker 

Felix Frankfurter and Nathan 
Greene 

Edwin E. Witte 

Robert L. Hale 
William Seagle 



xxii Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 

LABOR, METHODS OF REMUNERATION FOR H. S. Person 

LABOR MOVEMENT John R. Commons 
LABOR PARTIES 

GENERAL J. B. S. Hardman 

GREAT BRITAIN H. N. Brailsford 

BRITISH DOMINIONS Herbert Heaton 

UNITED STATES J. B. S. Hardman 

LABOR TAX See FORCED LABOR 

LABOR TURNOVER Paul H. Douglas 



Encyclopaedk 

of the 

SOCIAL 
SCIENCES 



Encyclopaedia of the 
Social Sciences 



INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION is the name 
given to those economic and technological de- 
velopments which gathering strength and speed 
during the eighteenth century produced modern 
industrialism. 

As a label it is admittedly unsatisfactory. One 
writer calls it "an unhappily chosen epithet for 
a singularly constructive epoch" (Beales); an- 
other doubts whether the term, "though useful 
enough when it was first adopted, has not by 
this.time served its turn" (Unwin); Lipson occa- 
sionally puts it in inverted commas. The chief 
objection is to the word revolution. Yet that 
use goes back to the period to which it is ap- 
plied. Yarn making machines, coke smelted iron, 
Watt's engine and Wedgwood's ceramic tri- 
umphs were described by contemporaries as 
"great and extraordinary," "most wonderful"; 
their effects must be "beyond the power of cal- 
culation." The steam engine would "produce 
great changes in the appearance of the civilized 
world"; and "a revolution is making," said Ar- 
thur Young in 1788 when he saw the textile 
machines spread from the cotton to the woolen 
industry. Frenchmen after 1789 naturally used 
the word even more freely in reference to 
changes in technique, organization and commer- 
cial policy; and it became part of the socialistic 
vocabulary. Blanqui in 1837 declared that by the 
revolution industrial conditions in England had 
been more profoundly transformed than at any 
period since the beginnings of social life. Engcls 
used the word in 1845, and the Marxian thesis 
was that the technological revolution had trans- 
formed the economic and social structure and 
would do the same to political and intellectual 
life. Toynbee knew Marx' Capital, had studied 
the German socialist movement and was un- 
doubtedly influenced thereby in his use and 
understanding of the term he put into academic 
circulation. Mill and Jevons also spoke of revo- 
lution; and in 1852 Michael Angelo Garvey, an 
English barrister, published a little volume called 
The Silent Revolution, which dealt with the ef- 
fects of steam transportation and the telegraph 
on "the condition of mankind." 

To Toynbee the use of the word seemed en- 



tirely justified. He envisaged a peaceful eve fol- 
lowed by a stormy dawn. Prior to 1760 the "old 
industrial system obtained"; industry was in the 
hands of small independent master manufac- 
turers who combined farming and industry, em- 
ployed a journeyman or two and trained an ap- 
prentice. Between master and man was a "warm 
attachment"; the employee was the "cherished 
dependent." The class of capitalist employers 
was "as yet in its infancy"; there was some put- 
ting out of materials by merchants to be worked 
up in the operative's home, and a few large fac- 
tories were in existence. But small scale organi- 
zation predominated, and the gulf between em- 
ployer and wage earner was narrow. Over this 
"quiet world" of "scarcely perceptible move- 
ment," this "slowly dissolving framework of 
medieval industrial life," hung the comprehen- 
sive code of state regulation of production, trade 
and distribution. Internal free trade had come 
in Great Britain, but foreign and colonial trade 
were fettered and free movement or enterprise 
was checked. 

This old order "was suddenly broken in pieces 
by the mighty blows of the steam engine and the 
power loom," the spinning machines, the im- 
proved roads, the expansion of domestic and 
foreign trade and the Wealth of Nations. The 
"two men who did most to bring [the revolution] 
about were Adam Smith and James Watt"; 
aided by the other inventors, they "destroyed 
the old world and built a new one." A period of 
"economic revolution and anarchy" resulted, in 
which productive methods changed, economic 
beliefs were revolutionized and the state swung 
over from regulation to laissez faire. Population 
was "torn up by the roots" and, like industry, 
was dragged "from cottages in distant valleys 
into factories and cities," there to become a col- 
lection of hands, "the living tool, of whom the 
employer knew less than he did of his steam 
engine." Population grew rapidly in numbers, 
but the number engaged in agriculture declined 
both relatively and absolutely; the factory system 
became the "all-prominent fact" in industry; 
overproduction and depressions "a phenom- 
enon quite unknown before" became normal 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



parts of business life; landlords and manufac- 
turers waxed rich, but the wage earner fared 
badly. True, he now had personal freedom, but 
war prices and the "innumerable evils which 
prevailed in this age of confusion" made his 
sufferings acute and long. Eventually his lot 
improved, thanks to organized self-help, the re- 
peal of the corn laws, and factory acts; but mean- 
while he had been in the track of a social tor- 
nado, which had torn him from his old moorings 
and left him damaged in status and living 
standards. 

Toynbee put the industrial revolution into the 
series of historical phases. Henceforth it was 
apparent that for any understanding of the nine- 
teenth century one must take account of English 
economics as well as of French politics. The 
term became popular, and at least two recent 
writers have described post-war efforts toward 
rationalization and the changes resulting from 
the coming of electric power and new chemical 
processes as "the New Industrial Revolution" 
(Meakin) and "the Second Industrial Revolu- 
tion" (Jevons). But economic historians use the 
phrase with increasing hesitation and many 
mental reservations. They dislike the suggestion 
that revolutions in any generally acceptable 
sense of that term happen in economic affairs. 
"Sudden catastrophic change is inconsistent 
with the slow gradual process of economic evo- 
lution," says Birnie; "On the vast stage of eco- 
nomic history no sudden shift of scene takes 
place," says Se"e; while Lipson emerges from 
a study of the seventeenth and eighteenth cen- 
turies with the conclusion that there is "no hiatus 
in economic development, but always a constant 
tide of progress and change, in which the old is 
blended almost imperceptibly with the new." 

The modern view springs from a fuller knowl- 
edge of the periods both before and after 1760 
than was possible in Toynbee *s day. It is now 
known that the revolution did not "break" on an 
almost unchanging world of small scale non- 
capitalistic units, that the speed of transforma- 
tion was far from rapid, that the ground was not 
quickly captured and that a picture of the social 
and economic evils of the period from 1760 to 
1850 is far from filling the whole canvas. In the 
first place, the notion of an "eve" is blurred, if 
not blotted out, when it is discovered that the 
revolution had in 1760 "been in preparation for 
two centuries" (Unwin); that large scale enter- 
prise under capitalistic conditions existed from 
at least the sixteenth century; that the changes in 
technique were "the completion of tendencies 



which had been significantly evident since Leo- 
nardo da Vinci" (Usher); and that the develop- 
ments between 1760 and 1830 "did but carry 
further, though on a far greater scale and with 
far greater rapidity, changes which had been 
proceeding long before" (Ashley). In the second 
place, the changes in productive methods de- 
pended on far more than a handful of inventions 
in Lancashire and Glasgow and with one or two 
exceptions took decades to work themselves out. 
The machines and engines raised as many prob- 
lems as they solved problems of metal supply, 
machine design, mechanical engineering, power 
transmission and so on. Machine production 
could improve only as quickly as did the pro- 
duction of machines and the invention of refine- 
ments to make their operation more efficient. 
The nature of some processes or materials was 
such that change was long delayed; wool cosnb- 
ing refused to yield to machinery until about 
1850, and wool yarn was so frail that even in 
1860 the power loom in a woolen mill could 
work no more quickly than did the hand loom. 
In some industries change resulted from chemi- 
cal discoveries rather than mechanical invention; 
in others, such as pottery, advance depended 
upon the discovery, by countless experiments, 
of new bodies, glazes, methods of decoration, 
better understanding and control of kiln tem- 
peratures as well as upon easier access by road 
and canal to raw materials and markets. Mining 
had no revolution; its story was one of "better 
methods, . . . slowly forged from the painful ex- 
perience of common men, and only gradually 
did a new idea or a new device spread from pit 
to pit or from one coalfield to another" (Ash- 
ton). Building, one of the biggest fields of em- 
ployment, suffered no revolution in methods 
until cheap steel and concrete were available. 
Thus with the one exception of spinning and its 
preliminary processes there was no sudden 
breaking of old methods or organization by 
"mighty blows." Professor Clapham's survey of 
British industry between 1820 and 1850 is a 
study in slow motion. He finds that "no single 
British industry had passed through a complete 
technical revolution before 1830" and reminds 
us that while the revolution had cut deep into 
the cotton industry by that date the Lancashire 
cotton operative was not the representative work- 
man of the day. Even the typical town operative 
was "very far indeed from being a person who 
performed for a self-made employer, in steaming 
air, with the aid of recently devised mechanism, 
operations which would have made his grand- 



Industrial Revolution 



father gape." Thus it is not until well into the 
nineteenth century that one finds the economic 
transformation approaching a stage that can be 
described as complete. A revolution which con- 
tinued for 150 years and had been in preparation 
for at least another 150 years may well seem to 
need a new label. 

Yet despite all hesitation the term stands and 
no better one has been devised. For there is in 
the period which began about 1750 something 
different in tempo and temper from that of any 
earlier epoch. The long inventive effort comes 
to a head in increased productive power, capital 
increases its power and resourcefulness, eco- 
nomic freedom is gained, domestic and foreign 
trade expand, the nature of the soil begins to be 
understood, goods can be moved more rapidly 
in greater bulk at lower cost for longer distances, 
anc? there is at least a "partial introduction of 
the methods of exact science in economic af- 
fairs" (Clapham). Any one of these things would 
have made a deep mark on the economic life of 
Europe; but when they came contemporane- 
ously they interacted on one another and pro- 
duced results which were far reaching and fun- 
damental. From this "unprecedented social and 
economic development" (Unwin) the material 
appearance of England was changed "more pro- 
foundly than at any other time since the epoch 
of the last geological changes" (Tawney).-^ 

The familiar question, "Why did the changes 
come when and where they did?" is now best 
answered if the changes are regarded as the out- 
come of developments which had been under 
way since at least 1600. Those developments 
included a great expansion in the volume of 
domestic, colonial and foreign trade; an im- 
provement in commercial and financial struc- 
ture; some growth of large scale organization and 
production; some advances in industrial equip- 
ment; and some scientific discoveries capable of 
industrial application. British trade grew fitfully 
but substantially during the seventeenth and 
eighteenth centuries: the European demand ex- 
panded; the American colonists provided a grow- 
ing market for textiles and hardware; the door 
into the Spanish possessions was forced wider 
open; while Africa, the West Indies and the 
Orient provided good markets and profitable 
materials for carriage to Europe. Such statistics 
as exist show that exports from Great Britain 
doubled between 1720 and 1760 and again by 
1795. Meanwhile the British population grew 
rapidly after, at latest, 1730, thanks chiefly to a 
declining death rate. It lived on the largest free 



trade area in Europe; the wealth which flowed 
in from oversea trade gave its people a larger 
spending power and fund of capital; and some 
of the goods it imported stimulated natives to 
find ways of making these articles at home, e.g. 
cottons and pottery. The French story is some- 
what similar. Export trade grew almost fivefold 
between 1715 and 1789 and was probably larger 
than that of Great Britain in the latter year. 
Shipowners and merchants flourished, and capi- 
tal accumulated. Holland and Scandinavia also 
shared in the general trade expansion. 

Economic organization improved during the 
seventeenth century. Banking and exchange fa- 
cilities became more abundant and satisfactory, 
and joint stock companies were established for a 
large variety of purposes. Industries which 
served large or distant markets (textiles), which 
needed large sums of capital for equipment 
(mining, finishing trades), which worked on 
costly raw material (silk, precious metals) or 
which supplied customers who demanded long 
credit and were slow in paying their bills (Lon- 
don high class tailoring, coach building) were 
passing into the hands of large entrepreneurs. 
Sometimes these men were big industrialists 
who had risen from small beginnings; but often 
they were merchants who established control 
over the production of the wares they sold. The 
merchant had capital or knew where to get it; 
he could afford to buy raw materials in bulk; he 
knew the needs of the market and he could allow 
long credit. He therefore sometimes gave orders 
to independent master manufacturers instead of 
buying what was offered in the open market; he 
supplied working capital to the mines from 
which he obtained his coal; but in some indus- 
tries he took control. He bought raw materials 
and put them out to be processed by domestic 
workers; he supplied patterns and specifications 
and possibly the tools and equipment as well; 
while the final processes whether of finishing or 
assembling might be done in his own workshop. 
Independent master manufacturers still existed, 
who worked aided by the members of their 
family, journeymen and apprentices and sold 
their wares in fairs or local markets; such men 
could be found in the urban handicrafts catering 
for purely local needs and in the woolen dis- 
tricts of Yorkshire. But in the great staple indus- 
tries especially textiles of France, the Low 
Countries and England the merchant was gain- 
ing control and sometimes counted his depend- 
ents by the hundred or even the thousand. At 
times the economies of supervision, discipline 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



and time saving were realized by gathering many 
of these workers under one roof; while in mining, 
brewing, soap making, smelting, shipbuilding, 
tanning and the finishing trades large groups of 
men had to work together by reason of the very 
nature of their work or of the equipment they 
used. Sometimes these groups worked under full 
factory conditions at machinery driven by power. 
Polhem's factory set up in Sweden about 1700 
was remarkable for its use of machinery, water 
power, division of labor and mass production 
methods. 

The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries also 
witnessed some advance in industrial equipment 
and scientific knowledge. Leonardo da Vinci's 
notebooks contain sketches of a spinning ma- 
chine, a power loom, roller bearings, universal 
joints, gears, lathes, drills, rollers for shaping 
iron, coin presses, turbines, steam cannon and 
other things, but no one can tell how far they 
depict contemporary equipment or are the prod- 
uct of his fertile imagination. The stocking 
frame, invented about 1589, was said to contain 
over two thousand parts; and cloth finishing 
machines caused much controversy in the same 
century. Glassmaking, tinning, gold and silver 
refining, were all improved after 1600; makers 
of clocks, jewelry and instruments of precision 
obtained better equipment; a ribbon loom capa- 
ble of weaving a dozen or more widths at once 
appeared in Danzig, then in Holland and finally 
in England; the Dutch developed the wind saw- 
mill and other devices for speedy production of 
ships; the French experimented with the "draw 
loom," by which patterned cloths could more 
easily be woven; Polhem's factory was full of 
power driven metal shears, slitting mills, rollers 
and hammers; and a silk throwing machine 
which had been known in Italy before 1300 was 
copied north of the Alps and reached England 
in 1718. The harnessing of water, wind and ani- 
mal power became more efficient, as did the use 
of gears, while the use of treadles seems to have 
spread. The work of the growing body of sci- 
entists on atmospheric pressure had by 1700 laid 
a foundation on which the steam engine could 
be built. True, the seventeenth century saw 
more technical problems than it was able to solve 
but it was far from being devoid of inventive 
inquisitive minds. 

The motives which led to the technical prog- 
ress of the eighteenth century were many and 
varied. Steam engines and coke fuel came as aids 
to men who were fighting a losing battle. Shallow 
deposits of coal, tin and copper were being ex- 



hausted, yet existing pumps could not cope with 
the water which seeped into the lower levels; 
ruin was inevitable unless the pumping problem 
could be solved. Ironmasters were faced with 
vanishing charcoal supplies as the forests near 
iron deposits were cut down; they must find a 
new fuel or abandon their furnaces. Many in- 
ventions aimed at saving labor, at making pos- 
sible the use of children for processes formerly 
done by adults and at overcoming a scarcity of 
skilled labor. The whole textile industry was 
hampered in its growth by the fact that a large 
number of workers was needed to prepare yarn 
for one weaver; a cotton loom used the yarn 
made by four or five spinners; a woolen weaver 
kept nine or ten people busy; while in the sail- 
cloth industry Arthur Young found twenty yarn 
makers to each weaver. Since much of the spin- 
ning was done by country dwellers, weavers 
were often idle in summer when the spinners 
went to gather the harvest. In making patterned 
cloths the silk weaver needed the aid of three 
women to raise or lower the warp threads prior 
to the passage of the shuttle. In the metal indus- 
tries the cutting of cogwheels for watches and 
other implements was slow and unsatisfactory 
until a machine was designed which "reduced 
the expense of workmanship to a trifle in com- 
parison to what it was before and [brought] the 
work to such an exactness that no hand can 
imitate it" (Campbell). Watt, Roebuck and 
Wedgwood all had great difficulty in finding 
tools and men capable of making goods exact in 
measurement: there was an error of three eighths 
of an inch in a cylinder made for Watt. Wilkin- 
son's boring machine was designed to make pos- 
sible the production of cannon and cylinders 
which would be uniform in diameter. 

Inventive ingenuity was also stimulated by 
the hope of monetary reward. Leonardo da Vinci 
had planned a needle polishing machine which 
was to bring him the income of a Medici, and 
eighteenth century opinion grew more tolerant 
toward the inventor's claim to compensation. 
Even when patent rights were challenged, it was 
agreed that the inventor should be rewarded by 
some gift from the state or from some organiza- 
tion set up to encourage invention. Kings and 
parliaments protected or rewarded innovators, 
and such bodies as the Society for the Encour- 
agement of Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce, 
established in London in 1754, offered premi- 
ums, medals and prizes. 

The spearheads of the technological advance 
in the eighteenth century were iron, cotton and 



Industrial Revolution 



pottery, and it is no mere accident that this 
should be so. For these industries were virtually 
new to England and were free from vested inter- 
ests and government control. More important 
still, they had two markets, one to be captured, 
the other to be created. They strove to capture 
existing demands which were already met by 
supplies from the continent or the Orient; but 
in addition they saw the vast demand which 
would spring into being if they could offer cheap 
cottons, crockery or iron. Wedgwood showed 
his grasp of the situation when he established a 
Useful Branch as well as an Ornamental Branch. 
In the latter he won a luxury market once served 
by Dutch, French, German and Oriental pot- 
ters; in the former he created a new demand 
atfiong all sections from the middle class to the 
poor. Lancashire cotton goods ousted oriental 
produce from the European, African and plan- 
tation markets and eventually invaded the Orient 
itself; they stole some ground from the linen and 
woolen producers; but the total was insignificant 
when compared with the new demand for more 
clothing and for domestic decoration which the 
cheap fabrics created. The story is not one of 
insistent demand compelling changes in produc- 
tive methods; it is rather one in which changed 
methods and lower production costs resulted in 
a commodity which created a new big demand. 

These many stimuli to industrial change were 
at work in both France and Britain all through 
the eighteenth century. In each country inven- 
tion and imitation were active, and the search 
for new ideas was made abroad as well as at 
home. England had welcomed the Huguenots 
after 1685; Lombe had copied the silk machine 
from Italy in 1718 and become a big factory 
owner; London paper makers strove eagerly to 
learn the secret of French, Dutch and Italian 
superiority; London calico printers imitated the 
methods practised m Hamburg; while tin plate 
makers set up rolling mills of Swedish design. 
The English countryside was sprinkled with 
methods, rotations, crops and implements picked 
up by English gentlemen during their "grand 
tour"; and such publications as the Annual Reg- 
ister and the Gentleman's Magazine gave space 
to descriptions of industrial and agricultural 
innovations. If one dare talk of "the spirit of 
the Age," that spirit in the mid-century was 
certainly a powerful stimulant to interest in and 
search for new and better methods. Of that 
spirit nearly all sections of society were drinking. 

Of the outcome of this enthusiasm no detailed 
account can be given here. The great inventors 



and discoverers whose names are known often 
built on foundations kid by scores of obscure 
men; their work was frequently an improvement 
or refinement upon that of others and in turn 
needed still further improvement before it be- 
came really satisfactory. Crompton's mule was, 
as its name suggests, at least a crossbred and 
did not do its best work until it was made self- 
acting nearly fifty years later. Watt's engine was 
originally only an improvement on that designed 
by Newcomcn sixty years before, and until it 
obtained a crank action was little more than a 
somewhat more economical pump than its pred- 
ecessor. Some men went searching on wrong 
tracks, and their chief contribution was that of 
warning others not to seek solutions in those di- 
rections. Cart Wright's loom, for instance, seems 
to have been almost worthless. In the gallery of 
inventors some canvases are too large, some 
should not be there at all and many deserving 
ones have not yet been painted, much less hung. 
By 1789 it was becoming apparent on both 
sides of the English Channel that Britain was 
pulling ahead of its nearest rival in industrial 
and agricultural technique. Young boasted that 
France had no counterparts to Arkwright, Wedg- 
wood, Darby, Wilkinson or Boulton and those 
Frenchmen who opposed the Anglo-French 
commercial treaty of 1786 pointed to the advan- 
tages Britain enjoyed through its lead in equip- 
ment; its comparative freedom from state inter- 
ference; its supplies of iron, coal, china clay 
and water power; its access to raw materials; its 
abundant supplies of capital in London, Liver- 
pool and Glasgow; and the power which its in- 
dustrialists and merchants wielded in political 
life. These assets did much to make Britain the 
workshop of the world during the next fifty years; 
the Napoleonic wars strengthened its grip on the 
seas and weakened France's access to raw mate- 
rials and markets, while the demands of these 
wars strengthened the demand for mass produc- 
tion of many commodities, a demand which the 
British inventions were particularly fitted to 
meet. Meanwhile France, which had been ea- 
gerly copying the British cotton and iron equip- 
ment before 1789, fell back; and although there 
was some development in the production of cot- 
ton, iron and sugar during the revolution and 
war it ended that period economically weaker, 
with foreign trade crippled, capital scarce, trans- 
port facilities disorganized and many skilled 
workers killed. Not until about 1830 did French 
economic effort begin seriously the task of mod- 
ernization, and even in 1850 there was little that 



Encyclopaedk of the Social Sciences 



8 



deserved to be called an industrial revolution. 
Fuel and raw materials were insufficient; capital 
was scarce; facilities for industrial investment 
were scanty; and the Frenchman was wedded to 
individualism, agriculture and small scale enter- 
prise. Alsace-Lorraine was lost before ways were 
found of turning its ore into steel. Hence nine- 
teenth century France fell behind its traditional 
rival; Holland had no resources on which to 
build up the new kind of industry; and of the 
two countries which were best fitted to follow 
the English lead only Belgium moved quickly; 
Germany remained almost stationary until 1850, 
if not later. It had to wait until the Zollverein and 
railroads overcame the obstacles to easy move- 
ment of persons and goods. In Italy industriali- 
zation was retarded by political disunity and 
later by lack of raw materials. 

Great Britain was therefore left almost alone 
in developing the new technique and organiza- 
tion. France did contribute something to the 
common stock of invention and discovery silk 
throwing machines, the Jacquard loom, the tu- 
bular boiler, the water turbine, chemical bleach- 
ing, a sewing machine and other things. Ger- 
many gave attention to the relations between 
science and production; Justus von Liebig put 
agricultural chemistry on its feet in 1 840; nearly 
a century before that date Margraaf had found 
there was sugar in beetroot; while in 1802 the 
Silesian Achard found a way of extracting it 
on a commercial scale and thus gave Europe a 
new industry. After 1800 the North American 
contribution began to be important, and by 1850 
American machine tools and machine products 
were entering the European market. The key- 
note of the American development was mass 
production of standardized articles, each part of 
which was made by machinery designed for one 
task. Skilled labor was scarce; the frontier con- 
sumer wanted goods which were cheap, service- 
able or labor saving rather than polished, well 
finished and long of life. The designing of spe- 
cial machines which could be attended and fed 
by unskilled workers therefore became the first 
manifestation of "Yankee ingenuity"; these ma- 
chines produced parts which were of standard 
sizes and which could therefore be assembled 
quickly by the same kind of labor. From the 
making of muskets and revolvers this method of 
production spread to that of clocks, woodwork, 
sewing machines, harvesters, locks and the like. 
English observers in the 1850*8 marveled at the 
"fearless and masterly manner" in which "cor- 
rect principles" were applied by American engi- 



neers. Still the crucial developments which led 
to production by power driven machines did 
take place chiefly on British soil; it was there 
that the new factories, metallurgical plants, big 
coal mines, engineering shops, railroad and 
steamship were worked out and the resulting 
social problems had first to be faced. 

The workshop of the world exported indus- 
trial products to all parts; but soon its customers 
wished to import industrialism instead, and the 
encouragement of that importation has figured 
largely in the politics of most countries. The 
motive of this state fostering of industrialization 
was the belief that it was derogatory, disgraceful 
and dangerous to remain a nation of farmers and 
handicraftsmen: dangerous because the handi- 
crafts would be destroyed by the competition 
of imported machine products, because there 
would be no openings for those whose inclina- 
tions and talents were not rural and because the 
nation could not make its own war equipment; 
derogatory because the standards of the nine- 
teenth century seemed to place the townsman 
on a higher plane than the rustic and the man 
who lived near a factory chimney above the 
hewer of wood, the shepherd or the cultivator; 
disgraceful because it was shameful to depend 
on other nations for the goods that one could 
and should make for oneself. If China, Japan 
and India were to count in the eyes of the west- 
ern world they must westernize their industrial 
equipment as well as their judicial and educa- 
tional systems; if Canada, Australia and even the 
United States were to emerge from colonial 
status or stature they must cut the ties that 
bound them to the factories of Lancashire, York- 
shire and the Black Country; if new or reborn 
nations, such as Germany or Italy, were to make 
their unity or freedom real they must translate 
nationalism into factories, mines, banks and sta- 
tistics of industrial output; and if Russian com- 
munists wished to justify their faith and place 
in a hostile capitalistic world they must teach a 
nation of peasants how to make electricity, 
tractors, cloth, electric lamps and cheap matches. 
Hence the political thought of nearly every na- 
tion has been obsessed with problems of protec- 
tion and self-sufficiency and of nurturing indus- 
trial growth in face of the competition of more 
highly industrialized countries. Only the crack 
of doom will end the debate concerning the 
extent to which success, where it has come, has 
been the result of governmental action in grant- 
ing tariffs, bounties and the like or has sprung 
from such other causes as abundant natural 



Industrial Revolution 



resources, improved transportation facilities, 
large home markets and the inventive ability, 
organizing capacity and industrious habits of the 
population. 

In the New World there was some industrial 
revolution, but many industries came so late that 
they were able to begin operations on the mod- 
ern plan. In the United States and to a slight 
degree in Australia and Canada there was some 
small scale and domestic industry to be de- 
stroyed or superseded. Colonial America had its 
frontier household manufacture of cloth, clothes, 
furniture and implements, its farmhouse proc- 
essing of land and animal products, its charcoal 
smelting of bog iron, its nail shops, town handi- 
craftsmen; distilleries, potash plants and ship- 
yifrds. It had some putting out and some artisans 
who rambled round the countryside or worked 
in their own shops on materials belonging to 
their customers; and its flour, fulling or sawmills 
often treated customers' grain, cloth or lumber. 
But frontier conditions usually decided that the 
settler should rely on others only for those goods 
which he could not make for himself. Gradually 
most of these occupations passed into factories 
and workshops; there was a steady shedding of 
by-occupations by the farmer and a correspond- 
ing concentration on his main task. Improved 
roads, canals and finally the railroad brought a 
wider area within reach of factory products and 
spinning wheel, churn and candle mold became 
antiques. The interruption of Anglo- American 
relations during the revolution stimulated do- 
mestic production, while the period from 1807 
to 1814 saw some adoption of machinery and 
factory organization; tariffs after 1815 helped the 
textile and iron industries over some of their 
difficulties with foreign competitors; the west- 
ward flow of population called for the produc- 
tion of settlers' effects at such inland points as 
Pittsburgh; the Erie Canal made it possible to 
process farm products at such centers as Buffalo 
and Rochester and to send them to eastern mar- 
kets; the scarcity of labor stimulated the produc- 
tion of labor saving farm implements and indus- 
trial machinery; while engines had to be designed 
and built suitable to American railroad condi- 
tions. But agriculture and commerce remained 
the chief interests until the Civil War; capital 
and enterprise found their richest rewards in the 
unoccupied areas of the west, in the production 
of staples for the seaboard or the European 
market, in land speculation, in supplying the 
stream of settlers and in shipping. The really 
serious industrialization of the country did not 



set in until after 1860; by that time the methods 
and organization which seemed most suitable 
had already been worked out in New or old 
England and only needed to be adapted when 
adopted. The extension of industrialization to 
the south of the United States, slowly since 1890, 
with increasing rapidity since 1914, has again 
involved the imposition of known industrial 
techniques on an agricultural economic organi- 
zation. Australia and Canada had little of the 
old order to sweep away; their industries could 
begin on the modern pattern. The South Ameri- 
can countries are still predominantly agricul- 
tural, the only important traces of industrializa- 
tion being the penetration of modern methods 
of finance, large scale plantation organization 
and the spreading use of machinery in the ex- 
tractive industries. 

In the Near and Far East the machine tech- 
nique has met a social organization far older and 
more stable than that which it superseded either 
in the countries of the New World or in Europe; 
but here too changes which may be called indus- 
trial revolutions have occurred or are in prog- 
ress. The first of the oriental countries to feel 
the impact of industrialism was India. Conquest, 
railways and foreign goods introduced the sys- 
tem. The dissolution of the old princedoms and 
their courts, followed by the rapid introduction 
of improved methods of transportation, and the 
prohibition of the importation of Indian cottons 
and silks into England had gone far toward de- 
stroying the highly developed urban and village 
industries of India even before the products of 
English machines appeared upon the Indian 
market. Loss of older means of livelihood drove 
increasing numbers of artisans back upon agri- 
culture, and meanwhile the relentless growth of 
population continued. By 1880 there were many 
observers who felt that the one solution of In- 
dia's economic difficulties was the development 
of modern industries. The factory system ap- 
peared first in the i85o's with the building of 
cotton and jute mills. While the jute industry 
was developed almost entirely by English capi- 
tal, the cotton mills were started by native Bom- 
bay merchants and the industry has remained 
largely in native hands. The growth of the cotton 
textile industry was slow until about 1880, when 
it began to expand rapidly. As has been true in 
most countries, machine spinning was at first far 
more important than weaving, large quantities 
of machine spun yarn being used by Indian hand 
loom weavers; even larger quantities were ex- 
ported to China and for a time to Japan. This 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



10 

Chinese market was eventually lost to Japan, 
and after the World War Japan became a for- 
midable competitor in the Indian market itself. 
Until 1914 India depended entirely upon im- 
ports for her machinery and industrial equip- 
ment. Early attempts to establish an iron and 
steel industry failed; and though the stimulus of 
war demands caused a rapid development of 
that industry after 1914, it is still unable to 
supply the country's needs. The war led also to 
some development of chemical industries, oil 
and water power. India has today over a million 
factory workers, and the Calcutta jute mills are 
large scale units. But industrialism has touched 
scarcely more than the fringe of Indian life as 
yet; banking and finance are little developed, 
and the factory worker is often a villager who 
has come to town for a few weeks or months in 
order to earn money to supplement the inade- 
quate income of the farm. 

The same is true of China. Attempts at fac- 
tory spinning of cotton were made as early as 
1860 and were successful after 1880. These early 
mills were owned by Chinese masters, who gath- 
ered in their kinsfolk and thus retained some- 
thing of the family unit. After China's defeat by 
Japan foreign capital was invested in cotton 
mills, and a large spinning industry half Japa- 
nese, partly Chinese and slightly British grew 
up in the Shanghai area. In that region about 
250 factories now exist making textiles and a 
wide range of other consumer goods, including 
even fountain pens and gramaphones; but else- 
where there has been little industrialization, ex- 
cept in Manchuria under Japanese influence. 

The rapidity of the modernization of Japan 
seems to make the phrase industrial revolution 
particularly applicable in its case; but it is sig- 
nificant that the commercial and financial trans- 
formations have been more far reaching than 
the strictly industrial. Even before 1868 impor- 
tant changes in economic organization had been 
taking place in Japan; throughout the eight- 
eenth and the early nineteenth century the feudal 
system was gradually being transformed by the 
development of a money economy, including a 
wage system. Under the modern government of 
the Meiji era industrialization became one of the 
first objectives of economic policy. Government 
subsidies secured by borrowings abroad made 
possible the construction of railroads and later 
of public utilities, gas and electric power works. 
The government established model factories and 
schools for the training of workers. Neverthe- 
less, the progress of industrialization was slow; 



not until after the Sino-Japanese and Russo- 
Japanese wars did Japan's factory industries de- 
velop on any large scale. The World War caused 
an enormous expansion of all industries and 
offered an opportunity for Japan to capture the 
markets of the Orient; but the troubled economic 
and political conditions of post-war years forced 
a considerable recession. In 1927 Japan had 
49,000 factories employing 1,700,000 workers. 
The most important factory industries are silk 
reeling and cotton spinning; but the weaving of 
cotton is still preponderantly a domestic indus- 
try, while silk weaving is negligible. Raw silk 
remains Japan's principal export and the major- 
ity of the population is still agricultural or rural, 
engaging in handicraft industries as a subsidiary 
occupation. Japan is already experiencing diffi- 
culties in finding an outlet for its cotton yarns 
or textile goods in India or China, and the de- 
velopment of the heavy metallurgical industries 
is costly because of its lack of raw materials. 

In one sense the vast changes in progress in 
Soviet Russia do not constitute an industrial 
revolution, since they do not represent the sub- 
stitution of one form of industrial organization 
for another. But this industrialization of an agri- 
cultural country is in another sense completely 
revolutionary. It could occur of course only after 
the methods and instruments of industrialism 
had been fully worked out in other countries. 
The logic of large scale production, the factory 
system and the machine technique are being 
adopted more completely in Russia, through 
their extension to agriculture, than anywhere 
else. The pattern of industrialization, which has 
been much the same for most countries, is com- 
pletely changed in Russia. The heavy industries 
are being developed first rather than last; indus- 
trialization, while depending on foreign aid and 
the exports necessary to pay for it, is not based 
on a foreign market for consumers' goods. The 
social consequences of the industrial revolution 
in Russia are also vastly different; great as the 
hardships involved may be they fall most heavily 
on such classes as the kulaks and the merchants, 
not on the factory worker. Russia possesses all 
the natural resources necessary for a most com- 
plete development of the machine industries; a 
labor force is in process of creation. It is easy to 
overestimate the rapidity of progress, but these 
changes do have a spectacular quality which the 
first industrial revolution never possessed even 
in retrospect. 

* In all lands where it came to displace an es- 
tablished industrial structure the industrial rev- 



Industrial Revolution 



olution ran a roughly similar course. The textile 
industry was usually the first to be affected, then 
the making of clothes, metal articles and food- 
stuffs; the large scale manufacture of iron and 
of steel represented often a distinct step 
forward but one not easy to take, while the 
manufacture of machines and producers' goods 
generally was a hazardous venture. Indeed it is 
this final step toward complete industrialization 
which has been most difficult for more recently 
industrialized countries. In lands coming late to 
industrialism the easiest success has been won 
in industries which process the natural or farm 
products, which produce simple wares such as 
blankets or plain cotton pieces or which enjoy 
the natural protection of distance from possible 
competitors. 

Migration of industry from manual domes- 
tic or shop conditions to the factory varied in 
speed from industry to industry. Spinning went 
quickly; weaving, knitting and some metal trades 
passed through a transitional workshop period, 
in which workers were gathered under one roof 
but continued to use the old equipment. In the 
clothing industries the sewing machine could 
be used in the home, and many women clung 
to the putting out system but had to submit to 
sweated conditions. The shoemaker and hand 
loom weaver put up a long fight, and the victory 
of the laundry and bakery is still far from com- 
plete in Europe. 

Dependence on coal and water power led to 
industrial concentration on the coal fields, river 
valleys and such belts as the fall line in America. 
Water power had only a limited effect in causing 
concentration, for it strung the factories all along 
the banks of rapidly flowing rivers, and for cer- 
tain textile washing processes an ample supply 
of water was almost as important as a supply of 
fuel or power. Where water and coal were found 
together, as in the Pennine valleys and eastern 
Belgium, industry was spread over the whole 
region in villages or towns. For the metal indus- 
tries location was determined by the coal supply, 
since it was easier to bring the metal to the coal 
than vice versa; but this involved the construc- 
tion of adequate transport facilities, such as the 
railroad between Lorraine and the Ruhr. 

The movement of population to the industrial 
areas still needs further study. But for England 
it is now evident that there was no simple mass 
transfer of people from the south and east to 
the north and west. The industrial towns grew 
by drawing workers in from the hinterland, and 
the void thus made was filled by people from 



II 

slightly further afield. Journeys were generally 
short, except in the case of the Irish who 
swarmed across the Irish Sea to Lancashire, 
Glasgow and Yorkshire. Only later, when the 
railroads made longer journeys easier, was there 
any serious long distance migration. In newer 
countries, such as the United States, native pop- 
ulation was for long streaming away from the 
eastern industrial centers and a continual inflow 
of immigrants was necessary to insure an ade- 
quate labor supply. 

Problems of urban health and housing were 
probably most acute in those towns which were 
the homes of the early spinning factories. In 
looking at them it should be remembered that 
until 1835 many British manufacturing centers 
had no adequate municipal government, that 
knowledge about the essentials of public health 
was scanty, that cheap production of pipes, 
bricks and woodwork did not come until about 
1840, that house building depended on the will- 
ingness of someone to sink capital in dwellings 
and that the rate of interest current or the profits 
to be made in industry might be more tempting 
than the return on house property. A glance at 
the housing of the poor in non-industrial towns 
of the eighteenth century and at the difficulties 
which have surrounded the provision of working 
class dwellings since 1914 should provoke a more 
merciful judgment of the "jerry builder" of the 
early nineteenth century. In the United States 
living conditions in the early textile towns of 
New England were very good; only with the 
coming of wave after wave of foreign laborers 
did the worst slum conditions appear. 

Of labor conditions no easy generalization is 
possible. Long hours, child labor, employment 
of women, insanitary conditions, payment in 
truck, unemployment, low wages, capitalistic 
tyranny, labor unrest, industrial fatigue, occu- 
pational diseases and the "cash nexus" were not 
inventions of industrial factory capitalism. Night 
work was a new thing in the textile industries; 
but the only novelty about child labor was that 
children now worked in large groups, were sub- 
ject to factory rather than parental discipline, 
discharged more responsible tasks, had to leave 
the hearth to work and were kept rigorously at 
their day or night tasks. It should be noted, 
however, that child labor was universally re- 
garded as natural and that the children's earn- 
ings were larger in the factory than they had 
been at home. When child labor was forbidden, 
something else education had to be devel- 
oped to fill the waking hours of the young. The 



12 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



hazards to life and limb might perhaps have 
been prevented before they were attacked by 
legislation but they had first to be recognized as 
such, and the apathy toward them was as marked 
among the operatives as among employers. Such 
conditions and attitudes repeated themselves in 
most countries or regions where the factory sys- 
tem was introduced. 

As to wages and employment light and shade 
alternate. In the early stages the new industries, 
especially cotton and pottery, seem to have paid 
much higher wages than were prevalent in the 
older industries, and the demand for hand loom 
weavers to cope with the flood of machine made 
yarn raised the rates paid for weaving. In Eng- 
land the long war with France lifted many nomi- 
nal wages and some real ones, but the slump 
after Waterloo lowered levels in industry and 
agriculture alike. The hand loom weaver and 
some other manual workers suffered when they 
stuck to their benches in face of the machine; 
but elsewhere conditions seem to have improved 
because of rising wages and falling prices after 
about 1820 or 1830. Some occupations passed 
from male to female hands, but new occupations 
were opened up and old ones expanded metal- 
lurgy, mechanical engineering, the construction 
and operation of railroads, shipbuilding, mining, 
building and the opportunities for skilled well 
paid work multiplied accordingly. 

In short, the industrial revolution increased 
rather than decreased the material welfare of the 
mass of the population; but some sections suf- 
fered from the transition, war and business fluc- 
tuations disturbed wages and prices and the 
dangers latent in the employee's lot became 
apparent. Unfortunately much of our view of 
the social aspects of the revolution is drawn from 
reports of official investigations, which in their 
very nature are full of complaints and griev- 
ances. From them one can paint the industrial 
revolution as "an orgy of soulless cupidity" 
(Tawney) and assume that to be the whole pic- 
ture. But quantitative studies such as that by 
Clapham; detailed business studies of Oldknow, 
Owen, Wedgwood, Boulton, Gott, Krupp and 
others; and a more detailed knowledge of pre- 
revolutionary conditions tone down the picture 
and make at least some of the industrial leaders 
appear more like human beings and less like 
incarnations of ruthless self-interest. Moreover 
it is still far from certain how much the revolu- 
tion was "a triumph of the spirit of enterprise" 
(Tawney). Enterprise there was but not always 
triumph, and the industrial field was strewn 



with the wreckage of men who failed. The trou- 
ble with machinery that broke down, with work- 
men who refused to use it, with customers who 
demanded long credit yet refused to pay their 
debts, with booms that burst, with banks that 
refused any more loans, with wars that closed 
markets, all made the road stony. Inadequate 
supplies of working capital wrecked many a ven- 
ture, and when a successful period came the 
profits had to be plowed back into the business. 
The industrial revolution has not yet been stud- 
ied through the records of bankruptcy, but 
enough is known to show on what a treacherous 
sea the entrepreneur of the early machine age 
launched his boat. 

HERBERT HEATON 

See: INDUSTRIALISM; FACTORY SYSTEM; ORGANIZA- 
TION, ECONOMIC; GUILDS; PUTTING OUT SYSTEM; 
CAPITALISM; SCIFNCE; INVENTION; MACHINES AND 
TOOLS; TECHNOLOGY; POWER, INDUSTRIAL; LOCALIZA- 
TION OF INDUSTRY, LARGE SCALE PRODUCTION; RAIL- 
ROADS; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; IRON AND Si ELL INDUSTRY; 
METALS; BANKING, COMMERCIAL; CREDIT; CORPORA- 
TION; MARKETING; IMPERIALISM; LABOR; HOURS OF 
LABOR; WOMEN IN INDUS IRY; LABOR MOVEMENT; 
URBANIZATION. 

Consult: FOR GENERAL DISCUSSION- Se"e, Henri, Les 
origines du capitalisme nwderne (Paris 1926), tr. by 
II. B. Vanderblue and G. F. Donot (London 1928); 
Sombart, Werner, Der nwderne Kapttalismus, 3 vols. 
(3rd ed. Munich 1928); Hobson, J., The Evolution of 
Modern Capitalism (London 1926); Kuhscher, J. M., 
Allgemeine Wirtschaftsgeschichte des Mittelalters und 
der Neuzeit, 2 vols. (Munich 1928-29) vol. n; Clap- 
ham, J. II., "Economic Change" in Cambridge Modern 
History, vol. x (Cambridge, Eng. 1907) ch. xxin; 
Bezanson, A., "Early Use of the Term 'Industrial 
Revolution' " in Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 
xxxvi (1921-22) 343-49; Usher, A. P., History of 
Mechanical Inventions (New York 1929). See also the 
series, Handbuch der Wirtschaftsgeschichte, published 
since 1918 under the editorship ot G. Brodmtz. 

FOR GREAT BRITAIN: Williams, J. B., Guide to the 
Printed Materials for English Social and Economic His- 
tory, 1750-1850, 2 vols. (New York 1926); Power, 
Eileen, The Industrial Revolution, 1750-1850, Eco- 
nomic History Society Bibliographies, no. i (Ixmdon 
1927); Toynbee, Arnold, Lectures on the Industrial 
Revolution (new ed. London 1908); Mantoux, Paul, 
La revolution industrielle au XV ill" siecle (Paris 1906), 
tr. by M. Vernon (rev. ed. London 1928); Knowles, 
L. C. A., The Industrial and Commercial Revolutions 
in Great Britain during the Nineteenth Century (4th ed. 
London 1926); Clapham, J. H , An Economic History 
of Modern Britain (and ed Cambridge, Eng. 1930); 
Hammond, J. L. and B., The Rise of Modern Industry 
(3rd ed. London 1927), and The Skilled Labourer, 
1760-1832 (2nd ed. London 1920); Lipson, E., An 
Introduction to the Economic History of England, 3 vols. 
(4th ed. London 1926-31) vols. ii-iii; Bowden, Witt, 
Industrial Society in England towards the End of the 
Eighteenth Century (New York 1925); Lord, John, 



Industrial Revolution Industrial Workers of the World 13 



Capital and Steam Power 1750-1800 (London 1923); 
Wadsworth, A. P., and Mann, J. de L., The Cotton 
Trade and Industrial Lancashire, 1600-1780 (Man- 
chester 1931); Ashton, T. S., Iron and Steel in the 
Industrial Revolution, University of Manchester, Eco- 
nomic History series, no. li (Manchester 1924); Smart, 
W., Economic Annals of the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols. 
(London 1910-17); Page, William, Commerce and In- 
dustry, 1813-1014, 2 vols. (London 1919), Levi, 
Leone, History of British Commerce . . . 17631870 
(London 1872); Buer, M. C., Health, Wealth and Pop- 
ulation in the Early Days of the Industrial Revolution 
(London 1926); Bowley, A. L., Wages in the United 
Kingdom in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, Eng. 
1900); Redford, Arthur, Labour Migration in England, 
1800-1850 (Manchester 1926), Webb, S. and B., His- 
tory of Trade Umomsrn (rev. ed. London 1920). 

FOR FRANCE AND GERMANY: Clapham, J. II. , Eco- 
nomic Development of France and Germany, 18151014 
(3rd ed. Cambridge, Eng. 1928), Dawson, W. H., 
The Evolution of Modern Germany (rev. ed. London 
1919); Se"e, Henri, La vie economique de la France sous 
la monarchic censitaire, 1815-1848 (Pans 1927); Mar- 
tin, Germain, Histoire economique et financiere (Pans 
1927), and La grande Industrie sous le regne de Louis 
Xiv (Paris 1899); Ballot, C., L' introduction du machi- 
msme dans I' Industrie franfaise, ed. by Claude GeVel 
(Pans 1923); Levasseur, Emile, Histoire des classes 
ouvneres en France depuis i78Qjusqu'a nos jours,, 2 vols. 
(2nd ed. Paris 1903-04); Sartorius von Waltershausen, 
A., Deutsche Wirtschaftsgeschichte, 1815-101 f (Jena 
1920); Sombart, W., Die deutsche Volkszvirtschaft im 
neunzehnten Jahrhundert (rev. ed. Berlin 1919), Pohle, 
Ludwig, Die Entwicklung des deutschen Wirtschafts- 
lebcn irn letzten Jahrhundert (sth ed. Leipsic 1923); 
Veblen, Thorstem, Imperial Germany and the Indus- 
trial Revolution (New York 1915). 

FOR THE UNITED STATES: Clark, V. S., History of 
Manufactures in the United States (New York 1929), 
Wright, Carroll D., The Industrial Evolution of the 
United States (New York 1895), Tryon, R. M , House- 
hold Manufactures in the United States, 1640-1860 
(Chicago 1917); Copeland, M. T., The Cotton Manu- 
facturing Industry in the United States (Cambridge, 
Mass. 1912), Ware, Caroline F., The Early New Eng- 
land Cotton Manufacture (Boston 1931), Cole, A. II., 
The American Wool Manufacture, z vols. (Cambridge, 
Mass. 1926), Swank, J. M., History of the Manufac- 
ture of Iron in All Ages, and Particularly in the United 
States from Colonial Times to l8cji (2nd ed. Philadel- 
phia 1892); Mitchell, Broadus and G. S., The Indus- 
trial Revolution in the South (Baltimore 1930); Bogart, 
E. L., Economic History of the American People (New 
York 1930), Bowden, Witt, The Industrial History of 
the United States (New York 1930); Commons, John 
R., History of Labour in the United States, 2 vols. 
(New York 1918). 

FOR THE ORIENT: Gadgil, D. R., The Industrial 
Evolution of India in Recent Times (London 1924), 
Jather, G. B., and Beri, S. G., Indian Economics, 2 
vols. (2nd ed. Oxford 1930); Anstey, Vera, The Eco- 
nomic Development of India (London 1929), Brough- 
ton, G. M., Labour in Indian Industries (Oxford 1924); 
Orchard, John E. and D ]., Japan's Economic Position 
(New York 1930); Moulton, Harold G., and Ko, 
Junichi, Japan, an Economic and Financial Appraisal 
(Washington 1931); Lieu, D. K., China's Industries 



and Finance (Peking 1927); Tso Chou, La revolution 
Economique dans la Chine contemporaine (1840-1929) 
(Pans 1930); "China" in American Academy of Politi- 
cal and Social Science, Annals, vol. clii (1930) pt. iii; 
Bain, H. Foster, Ores and Industry in the Far East 
(New York 1927). 

INDUSTRIAL UNIONISM. See TRADE 

UNIONS. 

INDUSTRIAL WORKERS OF THE 
WORLD. The Industrial Workers of the World, 
a revolutionary industrial union, was organized 
in 1905; its object is to organize the working class 
industrially not only for the everyday struggles 
against employers hut for the final overthrow of 
capitalism. It was originally a socialist organiza- 
tion but since 1908 it has combined the indige- 
nous American doctrine of industrial unionism 
with the ideology and practises of syndicalism. 
The emergence of the I. W. W. was the result 
of the convergence of two forces: the frustration 
in the east of the socialists who wished to com- 
mit the American Federation of Labor and the 
Knights of Labor to socialist programs and the 
sharp differences beyond the Mississippi be- 
tween the socialist Western Federation of Miners 
and the conservative, opportunist American 
Federation of Labor. In the early nineties Daniel 
De Leon and his followers in the Socialist Labor 
party were aggressively working in the east to 
convert to socialism the two chief national labor 
bodies of the country the declining Knights of 
Labor and their vigorous competitor the A. F. 
of L. These efforts failed and the De Leonites, 
insisting that the conservative unions hampered 
the emancipation of labor, organized in 1895 the 
Socialist Trade and Labor Alliance, which was 
avowedly socialist and revolutionary. The alli- 
ance created considerable agitation but was not 
a success; dissatisfaction with these manoeuvres 
of the De Leonites, which were linked up with 
fundamental differences involving revolutionary 
and opportunist conceptions of socialism, led 
the opportunist faction to bolt the Socialist La- 
bor party and at the turn of the century to set 
up the Socialist party, which opposed organiza- 
tion of dual unions and advocated "boring from 
within" the A. F. of L. Soon after its organiza- 
tion in 1893 the Western Federation had affili- 
ated with the A. F. of L. but broke away in 1897; 
it waged ten great strikes during the period 1893 
to 1903. In 1898, three years after the launching 
of the alliance, the Western Federation set up 
the Western Labor Union (after 1902 the Amer- 
ican Labor Union), of which the federation itself 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



14 

was the chief constituent. The American Labor 
Union was an industrial union, class conscious 
and strongly socialist; it proposed industrial 
unionism and independent political action "of 
all wage workers" as "the only method" of 
working class emancipation in essentials the 
program subsequently adopted by the I. W. W. 

By 1904 both the alliance and the American 
Labor Union were extremely weak the one a 
purely propagandist body, the other important 
only as the expression of the Western Federation 
of Miners. Meanwhile new and aggressive labor 
struggles provided an opportunity for the agita- 
tion of revolutionary unionism. The defeat of 
the steel workers' strike in 1901 glaringly re- 
vealed the limitations of craft unionism; the 
victory of the coal miners one year later stirred 
labor everywhere. There was an increasing dis- 
cussion of the need for a new labor organization, 
as the result of which a constitutional conven- 
tion met in 1905 and organized the Industrial 
Workers of the World. The most important 
organization represented in the convention was 
the Western Federation of Miners; other organi- 
zations were the alliance, the American Labor 
Union, the United Metal Workers' Industrial 
Union and a few disaffected locals of the A. F. 
of L. There were also a number of individual 
delegates from both the Socialist Labor party 
and the Socialist party. The proceedings were 
dominated by De Leon, William D. Haywood, 
Eugene V. Debs, William E. Trautmann and 
Vincent St. John. 

The I. W. W. arose primarily out of dissatis- 
faction with the craft unionism and conservative 
policies of the A. F. of L. The latter had repudi- 
ated the Knights of Labor policy of organizing 
all the workers, skilled and unskilled; its con- 
stituent unions were composed overwhelmingly 
of skilled workers among whom craftsmanship 
was still an important factor, and these unions 
refused to organize the unskilled workers (e.g. 
in the iron and steel industry). The I. W. W. on 
the contrary proposed to organize all wage work- 
ers, regardless of craft distinctions; it proposed 
moreover to organize them into industrial unions 
which would embrace all the workers in a par- 
ticular plant, enterprise and industry. The I. W. 
W. thesis was: machinery is rapidly eliminating 
the craftsman's skill; the unskilled workers are 
becoming preponderant and it is necessary to 
organize them; without the organization of these 
workers into industrial unions, an integrated 
unionism paralleling the integrated structure of 
modern industry, it is impossible to wage effec- 



tive war on the great combinations of capital. 
The craft structure of the A. F. of L., insisted 
the I. W. W., is not only incapable of organizing 
all the workers but develops the conservative 
policy of defense of exclusive craft interests (fre- 
quently at the expense of the unorganized work- 
ers) instead of the revolutionary policy of the 
overthrow of capitalism. 

Although the I. W. W , including its prede- 
cessor the American Labor Union, was strongly 
influenced by the traditions of earlier experi- 
ments in radical unionism, it made important 
departures. The I. W. W. accepted the Knights 
of Labor idea of organizing all workers including 
the unskilled but it repudiated the K. of L. 
leaders' middle class ideology and adopted a 
definitely socialist policy. The L W. W. agreed 
with the Socialist Trade and Labor Alliance that 
unions should organize for the overthrow of 
capitalism, but it substituted industrial unionism 
for the craft unionism of the alliance. This in- 
dustrial unionism was an essentially indigenous 
product and constitutes an American contribu- 
tion to revolutionary labor theory and practise; 
it grew primarily out of the rapidly increasing 
concentration of American industry. This con- 
centration, in socialist theory, represented the 
socialization of production upon which sociali- 
zation of industry and socialism depend; the 
I. W. W. accepted that conclusion but added a 
new concept the industrial unions, paralleling 
the integration of industry, would become the 
basis of the future socialist society (whence the 
theory of "forming the structure of the new 
society within the shell of the old"). This con- 
ception was given its most brilliant formulation 
by De Leon, who considered it the fulfilment of 
Engels' theory that the government of socialist 
society would be an "administration of things"; 
Lenin accepted the conception as an adumbra- 
tion of the Soviet system and as the ultimate 
form of government in communist society. 

Within one year a split took place in the 
I. W. W., which led to the secession of the 
Western Federation of Miners, depriving the 
new organization of nearly one half of its 60,000 
members. The split involved issues of revolu- 
tionary or moderate tactics and left control in 
the hands of the more revolutionary elements 
under De Leon, Trautmann, St. John and Hay- 
wood. 

The secession did not, however, end internal 
controversy; a new struggle developed between 
the advocates and opponents of political action. 
Although in theory the I. W. W. was a product 



Industrial Workers of the World 



of modern concentrated industry it drew its 
strength from casual labor in the west and immi- 
grant workers in the east, men who by the 
nature of their work and social position had no 
stake in voting and who developed an antistate 
complex. This complex was emphasized by the 
frontier traditions of "direct action" which in- 
fluenced western workers. In consequence a 
strong antipolitical tendency developed, aggra- 
vated by the struggle for party influence within 
the I. W. W. between representatives of the 
Socialist Labor party and the Socialist party. 
De Leon opposed the antipolitical tendency, 
emphasizing the Marxist conclusion that "every 
class struggle is a political struggle." The con- 
tro^versy over political action came to a head at 
the 1908 convention. The De Leon delegates 
were expelled and thereupon set up a rival 
I. W. W. with headquarters in Detroit, but it 
was never more than a propagandist group. It 
declined with the general decline of the Socialist 
Labor party, changed its name in 1915 to the 
Workers' International Industrial Union and 
struggled on to formal dissolution in 1925. The 
majority I . W. W., sometimes called the anarcho- 
syndicalist group, espoused revolutionary indus- 
trial unionism without affiliation or cooperation 
with any political party. The antipolitical bias of 
the groups now dominant in the I. W. W. was 
reenforced by syndicalist theory. But there were 
important differences between syndicalism and 
the I. W. W. The I. W. W. was an industrial 
union, while the European syndicalist groups 
were essentially craft organizations; moreover, 
where syndicalism envisaged the future society 
in terms of autonomous, loosely federated pro- 
ducers' groups, the I. W. W. proposed a more 
integrated economic organization of soeicty and 
more highly centralized social control the fun- 
damental difference between the anarchist and 
the socialist conceptions. 

In the midst of controversy and secession the 
I. W. W. was becoming a militant expression of 
class war in the United States. It made its appeal 
to all wage workers regardless of occupation, 
creed, color or sex, attempting to link up the 
immediate struggle with the necessity for the 
overthrow of capitalism. It opposed the inter- 
vention of intermediate agencies, such as the 
state, in labor's struggles with the employers and 
emphasized direct action in the form of strikes, 
boycotts and so on but not collective bargaining, 
which it considered an interference with labor's 
only weapon, the strike. Unlike the A. F. of L., 
which considered time agreements necessary 



15 

and sacred, the I. W. W. rejected them because 
such contracts make it more difficult to declare 
strikes at moments most embarrassing to the 
employers. The I. W. W. avoided violence and 
sabotage in spite of the emphasis on direct action; 
it talked much of those tactics but did almost 
nothing to apply them. Its tactics included inter- 
mittent strikes and strikes "on the job." In the 
course of its history the I. W. W. directed or 
participated in not fewer than 150 strikes, the 
most important of which were the Goldfield, 
Nevada, miners' strike of 1906-07; the Law- 
rence, Massachusetts, textile workers' strike of 
1912; a lumber workers' strike in Louisiana in 
the same year, in which many Negro workers 
participated; the Paterson, New Jersey, silk 
workers' strike of 1913; and the iron miners' 
strike on the Mesabi Range, Minnesota, in 1916. 
The period from 1905 to 1914 was one of rising 
prices and stationary real wages, of aggravated 
labor discontent; these conditions provided an 
opportunity for I. W. W. militancy, and its 
activities were considered a serious revolution- 
ary threat. Most of the I. W. W. strikes were 
marked by severe repression on the part of the 
public authorities; and along with their strikes 
the I. W. W. waged numerous "free speech" 
fights when their attempts to organize were in- 
terfered with. Arrests and convictions were 
numerous. The strikes were marked by tempo- 
rary accessions to the I. W. W. ranks, the 
frequent w inning of some or all of their demands 
and, at the end, abandonment of the battlefield 
without any serious attempt to build up a stable 
organization. This defect in I. W. W. tactics 
was aggravated by the difficulty of organizing 
unskilled workers, particularly when they were 
foreign born and spoke many languages. 

During the World War the I. W. W. took an 
antimilitarist position, opposed the participation 
of the United States in the war and continued 
to organize strikes in spite of the truce pro- 
claimed by the A. F. of L. The government 
acted swiftly and drastically; 166 of the I. W. W. 
leaders were indicted, 113 arraigned and tried 
and 93, including Haywood, convicted; they all 
received severe sentences, twenty years' impris- 
onment in the case of the more important leaders. 
The post-war years were marked by further 
prosecutions of the I. W. W. under the criminal 
syndicalism statutes of various states. In Wash- 
ington agitation and strikes among the lumber 
workers aroused considerable tension; on Armi- 
stice Day, 1919, a group of American Legion 
men in Centralia attacked the I. W. W. hall 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



16 



and met forcible resistance. In the struggle four 
legionaires were killed and a number of I. W. 
W.'s arrested; seven were sent to prison for from 
twenty-five to forty years; and although seven 
jurymen have since repudiated their verdict and 
there is a general demand for their release, the 
I. W. W.'s are still in prison. Wholesale prose- 
cutions effectively broke the strength of the 
organization for a period of years perhaps per- 
manently. They forced it to concentrate what 
strength it had upon legal defense and cam- 
paigns for amnesty. Its energy was further 
sapped by bitter internal controversy over the 
conditions on which its members should accept 
amnesty. The I. W. W. played no part in the 
great strike movement during the period 1919 
to 1922. 

This decline was sharpened by I. W. W. 
losses to the communists. The communist revo- 
lution in Russia profoundly influenced the I. W. 
W., some of whose former members were active 
in the Bolshevik party. At first the I. W. W. was 
sympathetic to the Bolshevik Revolution; but as 
communist theory and practise with their em- 
phasis on a political party and the capture of the 
state were better understood, a violent contro- 
versy over communism broke out. The contro- 
versy was aggravated by the organization of an 
American Communist party which struggled for 
hegemony over the revolutionary movement. An 
appeal issued in 1920 by Gregory Zinoviev in 
the name of the Communist International rec- 
ognized the "long and heroic service of the 
I. W. W. in the class war" and urged it to join 
the International; the appeal said that the exist- 
ing revolutionary situation did not permit of 
waiting until "the new society is built within the 
shell of the old," that the struggle of the workers 
must be a struggle for political power and that 
the I. W. W. theory of the general strike is in- 
complete unless it includes the final necessity of 
armed insurrection. The appeal was rejected; 
the I. W. W. emphasized its syndicalist orienta- 
tion and became increasingly hostile to com- 
munism and the Soviet system. The Commu- 
nists, however, were aided in the struggle by the 
fact that their program included fundamental 
elements of the I. W. W. program (as well as 
that of the Socialist Labor party); on the whole 
the I. W. W.'s have been Bolshevik and anti- 
syndicalist in their concepts of industrial union- 
ism and the structure of the new society and 
syndicalist and anti- Bolshevik in their rejection 
of political action. The essential theoretical dif- 
ferences are: the I. W. W. believes in the gradual 



acquisition of control of industry by economic 
action "on the job" and has no clear idea of 
how the final overthrow of capitalism is to be 
accomplished; the Communists accept indus- 
trial unionism but insist that it is necessary to 
overthrow the capitalist state and organize a 
dictatorship of the proletariat in order to build 
up the new society. These differences were at 
first a matter of discussion, and the Communists 
tried to win over the I. W. W.; in recent years 
the differences have become practical and have 
assumed the form of an open struggle for leader- 
ship over the revolutionary labor union move- 
ment. The Communist organization, the Trade 
Union Unity League, is opposed to the I. W. W. 
as well as the A. F. of L. In this struggle for 
leadership the I. W. W. has rapidly lost ground 
to the Communists. Left wing strikes which in 
pre-war days would have been led by the P. W. 
W. are now led by Communists. Many promi- 
nent I. W. W. leaders, such as Hay wood and 
William Z. Foster, joined the Communist party, 
and an appreciable proportion of this party's 
membership is composed of former members of 
the I. W. W. 

In 1924 the I. W. W. suffered a serious split 
over the question of centralization of power 
within the organization. Still smoldering differ- 
ences regarding amnesty were also involved. The 
so-called Emergency Program, or E. P., faction, 
supported especially by western groups, favored 
the loose federation of highly autonomous locals. 
The eastern, or Administration, group favored 
continuance as an amalgamation of local units 
subordinated to a highly centralized national 
organization. The decentralizers were defeated 
but set up a Reorganized Faction with head- 
quarters in Portland, Oregon, and formulated 
an emergency program calling for the abolition 
of certain national offices and the per capita tax 
to the general administration. In July, 1925, the 
E. P., or Reorganized Faction, adopted a new 
constitution which provided for the decentrali- 
zation of the industrial divisions of the organi- 
zation, called industrial unions, into job branches 
having local autonomy. Although this faction is 
still in existence it has even less influence than 
the dominant administration group. In Los An- 
geles it publishes a monthly paper, the New 
Unionist, which is extremely syndicalist in its 
theory and strike tactics. 

The enrolled membership of the I. W. W. has 
never been large and has always been of a shift- 
ing, unstable character. The organization prob- 
ably reached the peak of its popukrity and 



Industrial Workers of the World 



prestige at the time of the textile workers' strike 
in 1912, when it may have had 100,000 mem- 
bers. During the post-war period its member- 
ship and influence have been low and steadily 
declining. In 1930 it probably numbered less 
than 10,000 members. 

Few skilled workers have been attracted by 
the I. W. W. Its strength has always lain in its 
effective appeal to the casual and migratory 
worker in particular and the unskilled worker in 
general. These groups, which the A. F. of L. 
has largely ignored and failed to reach, the 
I. W. W. has successfully recruited. Its more im- 
portant branches are made up of such workers in 
lumbering, construction, agriculture, longshore 
work and marine transport. It has been strong- 
est on the Pacific coast and in the wheat belt 
but has succeeded temporarily in the textile 
milk of Massachusetts and New Jersey, in the 
lumbering industry in Louisiana, in the coal 
mines of Colorado and in the oil fields of Okla- 
homa. Its chief centers of influence in 1930 were 
the wheat belt, the northwest woods and the 
docks of the chief port cities. It attracts most 
strongly the immigrants and the native Ameri- 
cans who drift into migratory work. Its leaders 
have for the most part been Americans, although 
some foreigners, especially Italians, have played 
active roles in its affairs. The activities and influ- 
ence of the I. W. W. have been confined almost 
entirely to the United States and Canada, al- 
though there have been set up "foreign admin- 
istrations," which simply reflect the propaganda 
activity of seagoing I. W. W.'s. The organization 
has no other international affiliation. 

Of crucial significance is the practical result 
of the I. W. W.'s inability to combine effectively 
the struggle for immediate improvements with 
the struggle for final working class emancipa- 
tion, a defect aggravated by its guerilla strike 
tactics and lack of organizational solidity. The 
result is that the I. W. W. has been far less 
successful as a disciplined labor union than as 
an organization of propaganda and protest. Un- 
less immediate benefits can be offered and 
won workers do not stay in unions. This is 
why, although the I. W. W.'s have staged nu- 
merous strikes and free speech fights, these dra- 
matic activities have borne little or no fruit so 
far as permanent, stabilized organization is con- 
cerned. 

Although there have been among the I. W. 
W.'s not a few "two-card" men, holding union 
cards in some A. F. of L. union as well as in the 
I. W. W., the relations between the I. W. W. 



and the federation have been for the most part 
bitterly hostile. The I. W. W. was conceived in 
hostility to the federation and since 1905 has 
been a most persistent critic of that organization 
and its policies. The federation, which is op- 
posed to both syndicalism and communism, is 
highly conservative and represents primarily the 
interests of the skilled craftsman; the I. W. W. 
is radical and represents the unskilled worker, 
who is ignored by the A. F. of L. and whose 
interests demand more aggressive action. The 
two organizations typify sharply contrasted 
points of view on doctrine, on tactics, on form 
of organization as well as sharply contrasted 
groups of workers to whom they appeal. Many 
clashes have occurred between the I. W. W. and 
the A. F. of L ; the two organizations have de- 
nounced each other consistently and interfered 
in each other's strikes. During I. W. W. strikes 
the A. F. of L. unions of skilled workers would 
refuse to come out and were in consequence 
accused of "organized scabbery." These antag- 
onisms are not simply a product of theoretical 
differences; they express the conflict of interests 
between the skilled and unskilled workers, the 
organized and unorganized, which constitutes 
an important aspect of the American labor 
movement. 

The I. W. W. has been a significant influence 
in the American labor movement. Unquestion- 
ably it galvanized the A. F. of L. into taking 
more interest in the organization of unskilled 
labor; amalgamation proposals in the A. F. of L. 
are one result of the I. W. W. propaganda for 
industrial unionism. The industrial structure of 
some of the newer unions, like the Amalgamated 
Food Workers and several unions organized by 
Communists, such as the Needle Trades Indus- 
trial Union, is to be traced in part to the I. W. 
W.; indeed industrial unionism is an accepted 
idea of American communism. The I. W. W. 
has been responsible indirectly for state legis- 
lation more adequately to control private labor 
exchanges. It improved conditions among many 
groups of workers, especially in the lumber 
camps, and it has made it easier for Negro 
workers to organize into unions; in fact the 
I. W. W. was the first labor organization which 
actively organized the Negro. There is, finally, 
the influence of the I. W. W. upon the com- 
munist movement. The I. W. W. was an Ameri- 
can expression of the revolt against moderate 
socialism which developed in all sections of the 
international socialist movement. In the pre-war 
days the I. W. W. stimulated the development 



i8 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



of a strong left wing group in the Socialist 
party; the struggle between revolutionary and 
opportunist was waged over the issue of indus- 
trial unionism. During the war the new left 
wing, which led directly to organization of the 
Communist party, was influenced, although in 
minor degree, by I. W. W.'s, while the Com- 
munist party now claims the revolutionary her- 
itage of the I. W. W. 

PAUL F. BRISSENDEN 

See: LABOR MOVEMENT, DUAL UNIONISM; SYNDIC AL- 
ISM; CRIMINM. SYNUICAI ISM; Diutci ACTION, VIO- 
LENCE, SMJOTAGE. 

Consult: Bnssendcn, P F., History of the I. W. W.: A 
Study of American Syndicalism (2nd ed. New York 
1920); Industrial Workers of the World, Proceedings 
of the First Annual Convention (New York 1905); St. 
John, V., The I. W. W , Its History, Structure and 
Methods (rev. ed. Chicago 1917), Ebert, J., The I. 
W. W. in Theory and Practice (2nd ed Chicago 1922), 
and The Trial of a New Society (Cleveland 1913), 
Haywood, W. D , Bill Haytvood's Book (New York 
1929), Brooks, J. G , American Syndicalism: the I. W. 
W. (New York 1913), Parker, C. H , The Casual 
Laborer (New York 1020); Trautmann, W. E., Indus- 
trial Union Methods (Chicago 1912), De Leon, Daniel, 
The Preamble of the I. W. W. (New York 1905, new 
ed. with title The Socialist Reconstruction of So<iety, 
New York 1918), and Industrial Unionism (New York 
1920), George, Harrison, The L W. \V. Trial (n p , 
n.d. [1918)), Frama, L. C , The I W W. Trial (Chi- 
cago 1918), American Cuil Liberties Union, The 
Truth about the L Ti . W , Facts in Relation to the Tnal 
at Chicago, by Competent Industrial Iwestigators and 
Economists (New York 1918), and The Issues in the 
Centraha Murder Tnal (New York 1920), Todes, 
Charlotte, Labor and Lumber (New York 1931) chs. 
vui-x; Hutchms, Grace, Labor and Silk (New York 
1929); Industrial Workers of the World, /. W. W. 
Songs (zzd ed. Chicago 1926), Saposs, D. V., Left 
Winq Unionism (New York 1926) chs. ix-\i, Foster, 
W. Z , "Old Unions and New Unions" in Communist, 
vol. vn (1928) 399-405; Gambs, J. S., Tfie Decline of 
the I. W, W , Columbia University, Studies in His- 
tory, Economics and Public Law, whole no. 361 (New 
York 1932). See also the I. W. W. organs, Industrial 
Solidarity, published weekly in Chicago since 1909, 
and Industrial Worker, published weekly m Seattle 
since 1916. 

INDUSTRIALISM. Every age and every peo- 
ple has a character stamped upon it by the way 
it gets its bread. This is true not only of the 
modern era, which has been called the age of 
industrialism, but of all eras from the beginning 
of man's time on earth. It is as true of prehistoric 
peoples or of the ancient world as of modern 
Britain or the United States. Modern indus- 
trialism did not create man's dependence on his 
means of living or first cause society to take a 
shape governed by the nature of his economic 



activities. It only sets a new shape in place of 
the old and causes societies to organize them- 
selves in different ways. 

Industrialism represents essentially a particu- 
lar stage in human knowledge and in man's 
command over nature a stage at which man 
has learned the arts of machine production and 
the use of mechanical power on a large scale but 
has not yet become so much the master of these 
new arts as to bring them to full maturity or 
under fully satisfactory control. It is a phase in 
material progress, but only a phase, destined to 
be superseded when its development has become 
sufficiently complete. 

The point has not yet been reached when the 
world will have so thoroughly solved the prob- 
lem of producing material wealth that it will 
cease to be a problem at all and men will be left 
free to turn their attention to the satisfaction of 
other needs and desires. Nor can one expect 
such a point lo be reached over the world as a 
whole for a long time. Indeed in many countries 
poverty due to the underdevelopmcnt of pro- 
ductive power is still by far the most pressing 
economic problem. The masses in China and 
India are still desperately poor, not from unem- 
ployment or misdirection of productive energy 
but from sheer inability to produce enough to 
provide a reasonable standard of living. Their 
great problem is still to increase production in 
order to raise their own power to consume. 

But in the great industrial countries of Europe 
and America the sitiwtion is rather different. 
Not that enough is being produced to give all 
the citizens even of these countries a satisfactory 
standard of life but in their case the further 
increase of actual production seems to be held 
back far less by a failure of productive power 
than by an inability to find means of distributing 
the increased real wealth which they are in a 
position to produce. Their problems are pri- 
marily unemployment, unremunerative prices, 
lack of proper balance between the output of 
different kinds of goods, dislocation of regular 
trading relationships between countries and a 
creaking of the financial mechanism by which 
the exchange of goods has to be carried on. 
They could produce far more with their existing 
resources than they are producing at present; 
but they cannot do this because there is some- 
thing seriously wrong with their methods of 
distributing and exchanging wealth. And there 
seems little chance that their powers of produc- 
tion will be allowed to develop as they could 
until these fatal defects in the structure of Indus- 



Industrial Workers of the World Industrialism 19 



trial society have been somehow remedied. 
Meanwhile production and the standard of life 
advance only by fits and starts; and progress is 
again and again interrupted by crises which 
cause the industrial nations deliberately to re- 
strict their output of goods in an endeavor to 
create scarcity in place of a plenty which they 
have not learned to control. 

How does such a situation arise? Obviously 
the power to create more real wealth ought to 
be the means to a higher standard of living for 
the community as a whole. Obviously on the 
whole and in the long run it has hitherto been 
so witness the great advance in the real in- 
comes of all classes in industrial countries during 
the past century. But it is no less obvious that 
this advance is less than it might be if the exist- 
ing powers of production were being used to the 
full, and that even so it is made precarious by 
the liability of the economic system to recurrent 
crises and business depressions. 

Industrialism is fundamentally an affair of 
productive technique. It is based upon the dis- 
covery and exploitation of improved methods 
of producing wealth, primarily in the processes 
of manufacture but also to an increasing extent 
in agriculture and in the extractive industries 
yielding primary products. It is closely associ- 
ated with an increase in the scale of production, 
with the development of capitalistic methods in 
both manufacture and marketing and with the 
employment of wage labor. Its secondary effects 
have included hitherto a concentration of the 
population in densely inhabited urban areas, a 
very rapid increase in the volume of international 
trade, much lending of capital for development 
by the more advanced countries to those less 
advanced and a very rapid increase in the num- 
bers and social importance of the middle classes, 
including those engaged in the professions as 
well as in the administration and supervision of 
industry and commerce. 

At the basis of industrialism is the machine. 
Both capitalism and wage employment are much 
older than industrialism in the sense in which 
the term is used in this article; and there were 
many factories before there was a factory system 
based on mechanical power. But industrialism 
can be said to have begun when machinery 
driven by a central supply of mechanical power 
became the typical method of manufacturing 
production. For from that point industry re- 
placed commerce as the directing force of eco- 
nomic life, and the scale of production and the 
forms of business organization came to be deter- 



mined by the growth and character of mechani- 
cal power. 

Thus in England, where the industrial revo- 
lution proceeded a stage ahead of its develop- 
ment elsewhere, the industrial employer step by 
step ousted the merchant from his previous 
predominance. The typical rich men of the sev- 
enteenth and the early eighteenth century were 
merchants and financiers engaged in buying and 
selling goods gathered together from a host of 
small scale producers. The few big employers 
who did exist were not typical. The rich clothier 
whose memory is kept alive by his monuments 
and benefactions in countless English churches 
was not primarily an employer of labor but a 
merchant, although the position of the small 
producers who supplied him with the goods he 
distributed may often have differed little in 
effect from that of wage workers. The bourgeois 
class to which the aristocrats of England and 
France before the great changes of the eight- 
eenth century were compelled to pay some atten- 
tion was above all a class of merchants. 

The industrial revolution, based upon a great 
series of mechanical inventions and above all 
else on the economic utilization of steam power, 
radically changed the situation. It substituted 
for a relatively static system of production an 
essentially self-expanding technique. The mer- 
chant of the seventeenth or eighteenth century 
had indeed an incentive to expand his sales as a 
means to additional profits. But there was for 
him as a rule no economy in buying on a large 
scale or in larger total amount, since the small 
producers who supplied him could not produce 
more cheaply merely because they were asked 
to produce more. It is a commonplace among 
economists that handicraft production tends to 
obey a law of "constant cost" and indeed that, 
if additional workers have to be pressed rapidly 
into the service in order to meet an expansion 
of demand, costs will tend to increase on account 
of both the greater demand for labor and the 
less skill of the new labor attracted into the trade. 
This was undoubtedly the position in hand loom 
weaving in the eighteenth century, in the "golden 
age" of the hand loom weavers that preceded 
the introduction of the power loom. The desire 
of the eighteenth century merchant to purchase 
more goods from the small producers was there- 
fore conditional on his ability to sell more with- 
out reducing the price or even while increasing 
it; and this, owing to the rapid expansion of 
trade with both America and the East, he was 
in fact often able to do. 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



20 

But as fast as machine production based on 
mechanical power superseded handicraft, the 
situation was radically altered. Until then the 
pace of production had been set by the orders 
of the merchants, to whom the producers were 
for the most part merely subservient. But now 
under the new factory system the industrial 
employer himself had not only an incentive to 
get as large orders as he could but also a means 
of stimulating the merchant's demand. For in 
most cases he could produce more cheaply by 
increasing his output; and he was therefore, un- 
like the handicraftsman, in a position to offer 
the merchant goods at lower prices if only the 
merchant would increase his purchases. This 
enabled the merchant in his turn to take new 
steps in stimulating demand by offering goods 
at lower prices to the consumer both at home 
and abroad, and the increased orders given by 
merchants under these conditions reacted upon 
industry. But the initiative in the new system 
passed more and more into the hands of the 
industrial employer, whose offers of more goods 
at lower prices became the driving force of 
material progress. From this point of view the 
coming of industrialism was in manufacturing 
industry the transition from a condition of con- 
stant to one of decreasing costs. 

The industrial employer, who thus became 
the pivot of the new economic system, found 
himself urged on to new conquests by the pres- 
sure of the machine itself. He had to be abreast 
of his competitors in reducing prices; and this 
was a perpetual incentive to him both to increase 
his scale of production and to avail himself of 
the improved machines that were constantly 
being produced. There was doubtless, even when 
the industrial revolution was at its height, an 
optimum size for any given business beyond 
which it could not grow without loss of pro- 
ductive efficiency. But as the optimum was 
growing larger with very great rapidity, the great 
majority of businesses were probably well below 
it and racing to catch up. Accordingly machine 
technique gave the employer the greatest pos- 
sible stimulus to increase his scale and quantity 
of production in order to cut his prices and thus 
enabled the merchant to take full advantage of 
the elasticity of demand, especially in oversea 
markets. 

This last qualification is necessary because 
the strong competitive pressure on employers to 
reduce costs and prices, while it was a powerful 
stimulus to improved productive technique, re- 
acted unfavorably upon the level of wages and 



therefore upon the consuming power of the 
domestic market. The employer could cut his 
costs not only by improving the efficiency of 
production but also by reducing wages or taking 
a firm stand against their increase; and this 
course appealed strongly to the less efficient 
employers, who were threatened otherwise with 
extinction. Relatively few employers could be 
brought to believe in Robert Owen's doctrine 
of the economy of good wages and conditions; 
and perhaps relatively few were efficient enough 
to make it true in their own case. The rapidly 
falling costs of the new industrialism were based 
on low wages as well as on a rapidly improving 
technique of production. 

There was a second and no less powerful 
reason why wages and consuming power in the 
home market remained low in the period follow- 
ing the advent of industrialism. The new em- 
ployers under a constant necessity of improving 
their machinery and expanding their scale of 
production were avid for fresh supplies of capital 
which they could apply to these purposes. But 
capital was hard to find in the days before the 
recognition of limited liability and the working 
out of the modern solution of joint stock com- 
panies and corporations based on widely diffused 
and easily transferable shares. The employer was 
therefore compelled to expand his business out 
of his own resources as far as possible, living 
frugally himself and putting back his profits as 
capital. Under this pressure he was disposed fo 
resist demands for increased wages as sheer 
waste, the devotion to useless expenditure of 
resources badly needed for the expansion of 
output. 

It is true that money thus saved was spent on 
buildings and machinery. But the constructional 
trades, powerfully stimulated as they were by 
these new conditions, did not quickly respond 
to the new technique or pass over from handi- 
craft conditions of constant cost to conditions 
of decreasing cost. Building remained and re- 
mains in part even today a handicraft industry 
in which prices tend to rise rather than fall with 
any quick expansion of demand. And machine 
making continued for a long time to be a highly 
skilled job, demanding the services of highly 
skilled craftsmen who were limited in number 
and incapable of being reorganized on a basis of 
mass production. Not until the methods of pro- 
ducing iron and steel and of forging and casting 
had been revolutionized in the latter half of the 
nineteenth century did the engineering trades 
become at all generally subject to the conditions 



of decreasing cost which had come to prevail 
in the cotton trade more than fifty years earlier. 
Consequently spending on building and ma- 
chinery did not expand production in the same 
degree as spending on consumers' goods, which 
were on the whole more easily mass produced. 
This helps to explain the intense concentration 
of the new industrialism on the development of 
exports and the constant search for new markets 
abroad. 

Industrialism grew then at first chiefly in the 
textile trades, making Manchester the effective 
capital of the new industrial world. It was no 
accident that the economists who based their 
doctrines upon industrialism in this first phase 
came to be called the Manchester school or that 
their outstanding dogma was a supreme faith 
in laissez faire. For their own experience seemed 
plainly to demonstrate the self-expansive nature 
of the new industrial system, its capacity con- 
stantly to increase the supply of goods while 
lowering their cost, and the value of competition 
in weeding out the inefficient producers and 
compelling the survivors always to adopt the 
latest advances in technique on penalty of being 
left behind in the race. What could be better 
than a self-acting system which at once benefited 
the consumer by lowering prices, rewarded the 
efficient with the high profits of the pioneer and 
weeded out the inefficient who misused the re- 
sources of production? It was not clearly seen 
at this stage how far those results depended on 
the superior efficiency of Great Britain over 
other countries, of whose markets she was there- 
fore able to take her pick, or how low wages 
must retard the growth of consuming power in 
the home market. These difficulties came later; 
and before they had been fully realized the char- 
acter of industrialism had been greatly changed. 

For in time the new technique was extended 
from industry to industry until it came to em- 
brace the industries producing capital as well as 
consumers' goods. The development of railways 
played a dominant part in this transformation, 
not only because the railway enabled the interior 
of countries and continents to be opened up for 
economic exploitation but also because the de- 
mand for railway material gave an enormous 
stimulus to the metal trades and compelled them 
to devise and resort to mass production methods. 
The new steel making processes of Bessemer, 
Siemens, and Gilchrist and Thomas gave the 
metal using industries for the first time a reliable 
and durable raw material to which methods of 
standardized production could be applied and 



Industrialism 21 

thus made possible the development of large 
scale enterprise in the engineering and kindred 
trades as well as in the translation of shipbuild- 
ing from wood to metal. The same causes revo- 
lutionized the coal industry, greatly expanded 
already in the earlier phases of industrialism, 
and created a new and powerful grouping of 
"heavy industries" to balance the older textile 
trades. With the coming of these new forces the 
authority of Manchester began to wane; and 
industrialism, no longer so fully wedded to 
laissez faire and competition, entered on a new 
phase which led on before long to the growth of 
trusts and combines, the recrudescence of tariffs 
and in general to a renewed attempt at regu- 
lating just those processes of production and 
sale which the Manchester school held should 
be left severely alone. 

The explanation of this difference is not hard 
to find. In the first phase of industrialism the 
maximum expansion of wealth could be secured 
by concentrating as far as possible on those 
forms of production which most clearly showed 
their obedience to a law of decreasing costs in 
other words, primarily upon textiles. This could 
be done as long as there was adequate scope for 
the expansion of the sales of industrialized coun- 
tries in markets where native producers were 
well behind in efficiency. But in time it became 
clear that this expansion could not continue 
unabated unless steps were taken to develop the 
complementary powers of production of these 
less industrialized countries so as to increase 
their supply of goods which they could give in 
exchange for the mass produced manufactures 
of industrialism. The railway was the great in- 
strument of this development, opening up in 
the less industrialized countries vast new sources 
for the supply of raw materials and foodstuffs. 
Incidentally this expansion helped greatly to 
raise wages in the industrialized countries, both 
because it enabled export to go forward at a 
greater pace and because it secured an abundant 
supply of cheap foodstuffs. In the fourth quarter 
of the nineteenth century there was a rise in 
both money wages and the purchasing power of 
money with the result that a great stimulus was 
given to consumption in the home markets of 
the industrialized countries. 

In building railways and in supplying railway 
material and later in the supply of machinery 
produced on a large scale the industrialized 
countries advanced to a new type of export trade 
vitally different from the old. The sale of cotton 
textiles or woolen goods was essentially a cash 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



22 

transaction to be balanced at once by an equiva- 
lent purchase of goods. But the sale of railway 
material and other classes of capital goods could 
not be conducted on these terms, for the pur- 
chase price could be paid by the buyers only if 
and when the railway or the factory became 
productive. Payment for such exports had to 
await the economic development of the coun- 
tries to which they were sent and had then to 
be made in the products which their use had 
caused to be created. Consequently this second 
phase of industrialism was marked by a great 
increase in the export of capital that is, in the 
loan of capital in order to make possible the 
export of capital goods from the industrialized 
to the less developed parts of the world. Great 
Britain especially exported huge masses of capi- 
tal to all parts of the world and above all to its 
own dominions and India, to the United States 
and to the South American republics. Capital 
was exported also to the continent but was 
as a rule more speedily repaid and railways and 
factories built with British money were bought 
back by native investors. 

It would be far beyond the scope of this essay 
to describe the reactions of this growth of foreign 
investment on world politics and international 
rivalries and on the development of economic 
imperialism; here only its effects on industrial- 
ism in a narrower sense can be considered. It 
made possible a very rapid growth of the indus- 
tries producing capital goods and speeded up in 
them the development of an intensified tech- 
nique of mass production. Whereas in the first 
half of the nineteenth century the typical in- 
stance of large scale production was a cotton 
mill, by its close the types of large scale enter- 
prise were to be found above all in the heavy 
industries in the great steel making plants of 
Bethlehem or Middlesbrough, the great arma- 
ment factories, the shipyards and the great coal 
mines already closely linked with steel. In the 
heavy industries there was already a growing 
tendency for combination to replace competition 
and for the size of the business unit far to 
transcend that of the single manufacturing plant. 

Even before this period technical development 
had begun to influence business structure. As 
has been noted, the earlier industrialists were 
sorely hampered by shortage of capital. There 
was no investing public in the modern sense and 
broadly speaking no one could invest money in 
industrial development unless he either lent it 
to a business man on his personal security or 
became a partner in the business without the 



protection of limited liability and therefore at 
the hazard of his entire fortune. The gradually 
extended recognition by law of joint stock organ- 
ization and limited liability removed this diffi- 
culty and opened the door to industrial invest- 
ment by all who had savings or resources to 
spare. 

Joint stock and limited liability not only in- 
creased immensely the total resources available 
for business expansion but also removed the 
limits to the size of the capitalist concern. Before 
this the entrepreneur's difficulty had lain in 
gathering together enough capital to equip and 
run a plant large enough to take full advantage 
of the economies of large scale production. But 
now he was able not only to do this but readily 
to expand the scale of business organization So 
as to bring a number of separate plants under a 
unified control. While the scale of business or- 
ganization was still expanding under the inherent 
necessities of improving industrial technique, it 
was now able not only to reach these limits but 
also to pass beyond them. Indeed, as the larger 
concerns were often at an advantage both in rais- 
ing fresh resources in the capital market and in 
getting credit from bankers and others, to some 
extent a premium was put on a scale of business 
organization considerably larger than that made 
necessary by the technique of production itself. 
In the early days of the trust movement there 
was a marked tendency for the increase in the 
size of the business unit to be dictated by finan- 
cial rather than technological considerations, and 
this tendency was strongly manifested again in 
the troubled years after the World War in the 
gigantic mergers and concerns organized by 
Hugo Stinnes in Germany and in the unwieldy 
aggregations of businesses gathered under one 
control by Vickers or Lord Leverhulme in Great 
Britain. 

There was also, however, a new technological 
tendency leading toward an expansion of the 
business unit on a scale very much larger than 
that even of the largest single plant. Under the 
earlier conditions of industrialism the plant was 
the essential technical unit and each plant could 
face its own technical problems independently 
of the rest. But the modern development of 
industrial technology is making the separate 
plants growingly interdependent in a variety of 
ways. In the first place, it is often essential, if 
the maximum economy in production is to be 
secured, to group together in very close relation 
and under unified control plants engaged in 
complementary industrial processes in order, 



Industrialism 



2 3 



for example, to save intermediate transport costs 
on bulky half finished goods or in order to 
utilize a waste product, such as blast furnace 
gas, in a subsequent manufacturing process. 
Secondly, it is often advantageous from the 
standpoint of economic production to reduce 
and simplify the varieties of a particular com- 
modity placed on the market and for that pur- 
pose to secure at least as much unity of control 
as is necessary. Thirdly, the maximum economy 
is likely to be realized in many trades if each 
plant instead of producing a wide variety of 
goods in competition with the rest is in some 
degree specialized to the manufacture of a lim- 
ited range of products and thus enabled to pro- 
duce within this range upon a larger scale. 

l^he first of these technological requirements 
leads to a growth of vertical combination; that 
is, tht linking up of successive stages of produc- 
tion under a common control. The second leads 
to fairly loose horizontal agreements between 
firms at the same stage of manufacture but need 
not disturb the independence of each distinct 
business. The third leads to much closer hori- 
zontal integration, as it is found in such busi- 
nesses as Imperial Chemical Industries, Ltd., or 
the English Steel Corporation, Ltd., or the 
Vereinigte Stahlwerke, A.-G., in Germany. 

Karl Marx, whose analysis of the industrialism 
of the first half of the nineteenth century re- 
mains the most penetrating study of capitalist 
development, has often been arraigned as a false 
prophet because he predicted a growing con- 
centration of capital and an increasing polariza- 
tion of the two rival economic classes of capi- 
talists and laborers. It is indeed the case that 
there is in modern industrialism no sign of the 
disappearance of the small employer and that 
the growth of joint stock organization has in- 
creased immensely the number of small part 
proprietors of capitalist business. But, on the 
other hand, the small employer has become in- 
creasingly an agent or subcontractor or a hanger 
on of large scale business; and the great body of 
shareholders in modern industry has literally 
no say at all in its conduct or control. There has 
been a tremendous concentration if not of the 
ownership at any rate of the control of capital. 
The old personal nexus between employer and 
worker has been snapped; and the real struggle 
for power today is to an ever increasing extent 
between the few controllers of large scale indus- 
try and finance and the organized force of the 
labor movement, with the middle classes and the 
small investors largely passive spectators of the 



conflict. Even the growing body of industrial 
technicians, who should, one would suppose, 
occupy a key position in the modern world, have 
been able to assert themselves but little as an 
independent force. They have been in the main 
merely the executive servants of large scale capi- 
talism, although in many cases their personal 
sympathies might range them rather on the side 
of labor. 

It has been pointed out how industrialism in 
its first phase concerned itself mainly with the 
sale of cheap consumers' goods in the markets 
of the less developed countries and how in its 
second phase it supplemented this form of trade 
with the sale of capital goods fostered by the 
lending of capital and credit overseas. The sec- 
ond of these processes like the first cannot be 
expanded indefinitely without check. The first 
fails when it reaches the limits of the power of 
the less developed countries to offer more goods 
in exchange until their own productive resources 
have been more fully developed. This check 
leads on to the second phase; and this in turn 
fails when the burden of external debts upon the 
less developed countries becomes so large as to 
check further loans. Moreover as more and more 
countries pass under industrialism their rivalry 
in selling goods and lending capital to the less 
developed areas fills up the available markets 
more swiftly. The advanced countries find grow- 
ing difficulty in selling their goods and lending 
their capital overseas on favorable terms. They 
scramble for openings and concessions; and, as 
Marx foresaw, international rivalries are inten- 
sified and cries of "overproduction" raised. 

All this time the technological revolution 
knows no pause. It is always impelling indus- 
trialists to produce on a larger and larger scale 
and to create plants, based on heavier and 
heavier capital expenditure, which can be oper- 
ated at a profit over and above the interest 
charges involved in their construction only if 
they are able to work full time and to find buyers 
constantly for theif full output. Post-war Ger- 
many, for example, when it rationalized many 
of its industries with borrowed American capi- 
tal, created a productive machine capable of 
producing very cheaply while it was fully em- 
ployed, but only at high unit cost if the volume 
of output had to be cut down through a failure 
of markets. The same conditions apply to many 
types of business in the United States and Great 
Britain and in every advanced industrial country. 

It is therefore plain that the technical condi- 
tions of modern industry imperatively demand 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



24 

from the world of today an increase and a sta- 
bilization of consuming power. In default of this 
many of the greatest technical improvements are 
apt to mean not low costs but high because of 
the heavy expense of the capital equipment on. 
which interest has to be paid. These high costs 
serve further to restrict demand both because 
they result in high prices, often artificially main- 
tained, and because they throw potential con- 
sumers out of employment and so cut down their 
purchasing power. 

But the increase of consuming power up to 
the expanding limits of productive capacity is a 
matter that industrialism under present condi- 
tions finds very hard to arrange. Herein lies the 
chief importance for the world of the gigantic 
experiment in socialist industrialism that is now 
proceeding in Soviet Russia. The Russians have 
set themselves not only to bring their industries 
up to the very last point of modern technological 
development largely with the aid of American 
engineers but also to industrialize in their vast 
country with its millions of peasant proprietors 
the technique of agricultural production. The 
socialized factories of Russia are of far less po- 
tential significance for the future of the world 
than its socialized farms. 

But the importance of the Russian experiment 
does not lie mainly in the mere fact that the 
Russians are forcing on industrialization at a 
hitherto unprecedented pace but rather in the 
fact that they are doing this under conditions 
which insure an outlet in consumption for 
everything that they are able to produce. With 
the entire control of production and distribution 
centralized those in control are able to order what 
things shall be produced and in what relative 
quantities and also to distribute enough pur- 
chasing power among consumers to insure a sale 
for all that can be produced. All this of course 
can be done only within certain margins of error 
and subject to the export of enough goods to 
pay for what must be imported. But with the 
export trade in the hands of the state exports 
are not restricted to those that can be sold at a 
money profit. Foreign trade is in essence barter, 
and the state can put on imports prices calcu- 
lated to represent the value of the exports needed 
to pay for them. Under these conditions Russia 
appears to be immune from the fears of over- 
production or underconsumption which beset 
the rest of the industrial world. To whatever 
other objections its economic system may be 
open, it seems to have solved the problem of 
balancing production and consumption and thus 



have set itself free to make the fullest use of 
every technical improvement in the arts of pro- 
duction. 

This example of Russia raises a fundamental 
issue. How far are industrialism and capitalism 
the same thing viewed from two different as- 
pects? Or how far are they two different and 
separate things connected only at a particular 
stage of the world's evolution? Historically the 
connection is close, but they can by no means 
be identified. For, as has been pointed out, capi- 
talism existed long before industrialism and took 
at first a mercantile rather than an industrial 
form. It is arguable that as capitalism preceded 
industrialism and was modified by its coming 
so industrialism is destined to outlive capitalism, 
taking on a new shape, as in Russia, untier 
socialist control. 

For manifestly socialism, the child of indus- 
trialism, will not speedily take up arms against 
its parent. Industrialism bred socialism because 
it required the concentration of the workers into 
factories, their subjection to a common disci- 
pline of monotonous labor and an opposition 
between their demand for higher wages and the 
demand of the owners of the instruments of 
production for interest and profits. But socialism 
is not hostile to industrialism; basing itself on 
the demand for a higher standard of life for all, 
it therefore cannot afford to dispense with the 
fullest possible use of every technical deyice 
which will serve to increase production and 
lighten the burden of labor. It is true that the 
workers today may sometimes oppose the intro- 
duction of labor saving devices or other instru- 
ments of higher production through fear of 
unemployment or out of hostility to the capitalist 
controllers of industry. But if under a socialist 
system they get the instruments of production 
into their own hands, as they have done in 
Russia, they are bound to be on the side of 
changes designed to increase output or to lighten 
labor. Possibly at a later stage of the world's 
history, when the problem of producing enough 
to afford to all a satisfactory standard of material 
living has been fully solved, the mass of the 
people may declare against industrialism and 
express in deeds its preference for some other 
system; but assuredly that time is not yet. The 
advent of socialism would intensify and not re- 
tard the progress of industrialization. 

This remains true despite the common indict- 
ment of industrialism that it condemns the great 
mass of the workers to a life of dull, monotonous 
and even irksome toil. It is easy to contrast the 



Industrialism 



skilled, varied and interesting labor of the handi- 
craftsman with the deadening monotony of 
purely repetitive machine minding. But before 
industrialism arose what part of the whole pop- 
ulation consisted of skilled handicraftsmen? Was 
it ever as large proportionately as the number of 
persons, including those in supervisory and pro- 
fessional work, to whom the modern economic 
system affords interesting and colorful employ- 
ment? If the modern machine minder is to be 
contrasted with the guildsman of the Middle 
Ages, he should be contrasted with the medi- 
aeval peasant as well. And if one is to stress the 
effects of machinery in destroying craftsman- 
ship, it should not be forgotten what effects it 
has had and the far greater effects it might 
haVe under proper control in eliminating hard, 
disagreeable, unskilled and brutalizing labor. 

The modern world cannot yet afford to re- 
strict its use of machinery, both because there 
is much drudgery still to be eliminated and be- 
cause the growth of working class power means 
an ever more insistent demand for a high and 
rising standard of life. If therefore capitalism 
gives place to socialism, the first phase of social- 
ism will be more intensely industrialist than 
capitalism has ever been, because for the first 
time the whole community will be pulling to- 
gether toward higher production over the whole 
field of industry and agriculture as well as in the 
management of domestic affairs to remove the 
burden of the drudgery of housekeeping now 
laid on half the human race. 

It does not follow that industrialism need in 
its later phases preserve certain of the features 
most prominently associated with it up to the 
present time. Urbanization is still proceeding 
unchecked in the industrial countries, but its 
causes are now social quite as much as economic. 
The development of cheap road transport and 
of widely diffused electrical power is removing 
the technological reasons for close urban con- 
centration of industry and preparing the way for 
a rediffusion which will enable it to be carried 
on under far healthier conditions. Little advan- 
tage has yet been taken of these opportunities, 
because no less essential to business than acces- 
sible power and cheap transport is an available 
supply of labor with sufficient housing and kin- 
dred accommodation. The business that wants 
to set up in the country has to attract its labor 
and often to house it and help provide it with 
the amenities of life. It cannot readily take on 
fresh workers to meet a rush or discharge work- 
ers when times are bad for fear of losing them 



altogether. Accordingly only businesses catering 
for a stable demand are able to move out of the 
towns, and even such businesses are often de- 
terred by the difficulties and initial capital costs. 

Nor is this the only factor. Urban life has for 
the worker many attractions: its cheap amuse- 
ments, varied society, the hurry and bustle of 
life and a sense of nearness to the center of 
things. It increases his freedom to change his 
job and his independence of his employer, whose 
eye cannot always be on him out of working 
hours. Men and women leave the country for 
the town from preference as well as from neces- 
sity, and business tends to stay near the sources 
of labor supply. 

But here again a socialist system might make 
a great difference. For with the power of coor- 
dinated planning of industry in its hands it 
would have also the power of town and regional 
planning. It would be able, as the Russians are 
endeavoring, to create new small towns in the 
country areas and to equip them with the means 
of a varied and satisfying life, as only a few 
capitalists here and there have tried to do with 
garden villages and the like. Even so the socialist 
state would not succeed in decentralizing and 
de-urbanizing industry if the preference of the 
great mass of men was for living close together 
in great towns; but at least the other obstacles 
in the way of decentralization could be removed. 

If under a socialist system industrialism 
should be intensified in order to provide a higher 
standard of life, there would nevertheless arise 
also a keener demand for leisure. The necessity 
of reconciling these two demands would only 
increase the pressure to nuke the most pro- 
ductive use of labor, to push rationalization to 
the furthest possible point and to eliminate all 
preventible waste of human energy. Hours of 
labor would doubtless be reduced; but the tend- 
ency would be to put more labor into each hour 
and then to aim at reducing the burden of this 
labor by increased mechanization of processes. 
If mechanization were applied with the con- 
scious object of making labor less hard and 
intense as well as more productive, a great deal 
that is barely attempted as yet could be readily 
accomplished. The demands for more leisure and 
for more production do limit each other in some 
degree, but they are by no means incompatible. 
Industrialism then does not connote capital- 
ism, although it is historically connected with it. 
The essence of industrialism lies in certain tech- 
nical forms of productive activity which are 
capable of being directed to various economic 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



26 



ends and by radically different forms of eco- 
nomic organization. It may be, as Marx insisted, 
that capitalism has played an indispensable his- 
toric role in the development of industrialism, 
because only under the control of the autocratic 
individual entrepreneur could the new technical 
forces have found free play. Certainly it needed 
a strong directing authority to break up and 
replace the mercantile capitalism of the pre- 
industrialist era, to destroy the domestic system 
of small scale production and concentrate the 
workers in factories and towns, to accumulate 
capital at the expense of the immediate standard 
of living and to force upon the state an attitude 
toward industry consistent with the free growth 
of the new powers of production. Certainly the 
state itself, based on the aristocratic power of 
the landed classes, was at the time of the tech- 
nical revolution quite unfitted to assume this 
directing role; and certainly the working class 
was equally unfitted, for it learned cohesion and 
became a force only as a result of its experience 
of concentration and discipline under the new 
industrial system. Capitalism was therefore for 
the countries that led the way into industrialism 
an indispensable stage; but it does not follow 
that industrialism once created depends on the 
survival of capitalism for its effective operation. 

Indeed, to use again a Marxian phrase, there 
are signs today that capitalism has become a 
fetter upon the limbs of the industrial giant, 
holding back industrial development and check- 
ing the increase of production for fear of glutting 
the market. For the capitalist system of pro- 
ductive organization is based essentially on the 
incentive of private profit. The capitalist entre- 
preneur will not and cannot go on producing 
goods unless he can make a profit by their sale. 
His market is therefore limited not by the needs 
of the consumers but by their willingness and 
ability to pay him a remunerative price. As the 
prices he can get tend to fall as the supply of 
goods on the market is increased, the entrepre- 
neur is disposed to retaliate by restricting pro- 
duction in order to keep them up to a remunera- 
tive level. But this reacts on his costs, which 
tend to decrease with larger and to increase with 
smaller output. Everywhere in the world today 
frantic efforts are being made to hold stocks of 
goods off the market, to buy up "redundant" 
factories in order to close them down and to 
maintain prices by valorization schemes at the 
cost of limiting demand. These are surely signs 
of something amiss with the capitalist world. 

Some say that all would be well if capitalists 



would but abandon their attempts to control the 
market and go back to competition and laissez 
faire. But there is no chance of their doing this, 
because so many of the factors of production 
that they have to use are now under external 
control. The state limits their authority by legis- 
lation, and trade unions are too strong both 
economically and politically to allow wages to 
be governed by the mere higgling of the market. 
Moreover, even if all these obstacles could be 
removed, where could world capitalism hope to 
sell the vast mass of goods industrialism is capa- 
ble of producing unless it were prepared to let 
wages rise to a point fully corresponding to the 
growth of productive capacity? And that would 
ruin the capitalists of any one country unless 
that country were isolated from the rest of the 
world or unless all other leading countries did 
the same. 

A return to laissez faire is impossible. The 
concentration of capital needed for the full ex- 
ploitation of modern productive resources is too 
great to be left uncontrolled by the state; for 
those who have this concentrated capital in their 
hands will assuredly control the state unless it 
controls them. The attempts of capitalist com- 
bines to control production and prices are apt 
to defeat themselves, creating artificial scarcity, 
depression and unemployment in place of the 
plenty which man's technical command over 
nature is making possible. Is not the truth tfyen 
that partial controls set up by groups of entre- 
preneurs for the maintenance of profits will have 
to be gathered up into a wider unified control of 
industry based on maximum production bal- 
anced by an equivalent emission of consuming 
power? There is nothing in this idea inconsistent 
with the development of industrialism. On the 
contrary, it seems that industrialism has now 
reached a stage at which its fuller development 
requires above all else coherent planning and 
unified control from the standpoint of consump- 
tion as well as of productive technique. 

G. D. H. COLE 

See: INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION; ORGANIZATION, ECO- 
NOMIC; MACHINES AND TOOLS; TECHNOLOGY; FACTORY 
SYSTEM; LABOR; POWER, INDUSTRIAL; LARGE SCALE 
PRODUCTION; MARKETING; CAPITALISM; CORPORATION; 
COMBINAIIONS, INDUSTRIAL; RATIONALIZATION; LAIS- 
SFZ FAIRE, GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF INDUSTRY; 
SOCIALISM; GOSPLAN; LABOR MOVEMENT; FOREIGN 
INVESTMENT; IMPERIALISM; URBANIZATION; REGIONAL 
PLANNING; LEISURE. 

INFANT MORTALITY. See CHILD, section 
on CHILD MORTALITY. 



Industrialism Infanticide 



INFANTICIDE is the murder of a newborn 
child committed by the parents or with their 
consent a practise that stands apart both as to 
its origin and its associations from the killing of 
another man's child, which is simple murder. 
In some cultures parents are allowed to decide 
whether the newborn child shall be reared; if 
their decision is positive they will not thereafter 
under normal circumstances kill it. Older chil- 
dren are sometimes killed in times of famine 
such cases have been known in Europe during 
sieges but far from being customary these acts 
have been regarded as a breach of the moral law. 
Likewise if a mother, like Medea, kills her chil- 
dren as an act of spite against her husband, her 
deed is regarded as a crime and is remembered 
with horror. 

Judging from its wide distribution, infanticide 
is probably extremely ancient. Destruction of 
human progeny is universal whether in the form 
of infanticide, abortion or contraceptive meas- 
ures. Infanticide is the most primitive, since 
prenatal destruction involves anatomical and 
physiological knowledge. Even with this knowl- 
edge abortion is hazardous and consequently has 
never been as prevalent as infanticide, except 
where the latter is treated as murder. 

The primary cause of infanticide is the diffi- 
culty of obtaining sufficient food, whether be- 
cause the population has reached a saturation 
point or because of some temporary shortage. 
Almong peoples such as the Africans and South 
Sea islanders, who suckle their children for as 
long as two years, a child born before the pre- 
ceding child is weaned is sometimes killed. In 
communities such as those of the Australian 
aborigines, where women are indispensable for 
the food supply, no discrimination in infanticide 
is made between the sexes. In Rome, Greece, 
Arabia, India and China women of the upper 
classes, relieved by the males of the harder tasks 
both as an effort to keep them young and as a 
sign of rank, became an economic burden; and 
consequently infanticide fell mainly on the fe- 
males. The necessity of finding a dowry for 
daughters contributed to a selection of female 
children for infanticide in China and India. An- 
cestor cults of Greece, Rome, India and China, 
which could be transmitted only through the 
males, also resulted in the destruction of girl 
infants. When a sorcerer or astrologer was con- 
sulted before deciding the fate of the infant, it 
was usually killed if the omens were interpreted 
as indicating that it would bring ill luck or ca- 
lamity a motive for infanticide familiar in 



myths, such as that of Oedipus. The Roman 
Twelve Tables forbade the rearing of deformed 
children; in Sparta the newborn child was sub- 
mitted to the elders, who exposed deformed in- 
fants to death. Athens did not enforce such 
infanticide, but Plato and Aristotle advocated 
the practise. In ancient Greece exposure often 
proceeded from affection for the previous chil- 
dren, from a desire to procure for them a stand- 
ard of living which numbers would have made 
impossible. Illegitimate birth, which has been a 
common cause of infanticide, has remained prac- 
tically the only cause in modern Europe, where 
infanticide has declined with the spread of con- 
traceptives. 

The decision as to whether to rear or kill a 
child is usually made at birth, probably because 
the parents become attached to the child if it is 
allowed to live for some time. In some countries 
there is a ritual reason: as long as the child has 
not gone through some sacrament it is not ac- 
counted a full human being or a member of the 
tribe. In Athens the decision was made prior to 
the amphidromia, a ceremony at which the child 
was carried round the hearth and so associated 
with the cult of the ancestors. The Frisian father 
could destroy the child only before the child had 
taken food and by this act had entered into 
communion. 

The usual method of infanticide is by suffo- 
cation, by choking or by drowning; the infant's 
blood is rarely shed. The child may be exposed 
to starve, to die of cold or to be eaten by dogs 
sometimes for the purpose of insuring death but 
more frequently in order to give it every chance 
of being picked up and reared by a stranger. 
Foundling hospitals have been established in 
China and in modern Europe to provide for 
infants so exposed. Conflict between parental 
affection and necessity also betrays itself in the 
rationalizations offered for the practise, such as 
the one found among the Chinese that female 
children by being killed are given a chance to be 
reborn as males. 

In China edicts have frequently been issued 
against infanticide. In Europe the church in 305 
decreed excommunication for life as the punish- 
ment for women guilty of the double crime of 
adultery and consequent infanticide; this sen- 
tence was reduced in 314 to ten years, in 524 to 
seven. The Council of Toledo in 589 directed 
clerics and civil judges to unite in their efforts 
to prevent infanticide due to poverty, which 
proves that the Theodosian code, which pre- 
scribed death, had remained ineffective. Infan- 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



28 



ticide is condemned in the Koran (xvn: 38). 
Modern English and Scottish laws treat infan- 
ticide as murder English law defines infanti- 
cide as the killing of the child after the entnc 
body is brought from the womb alive; Scottish 
law from the time the child has breathed, 
whether or not it is completely out of the womb. 
The crown has usually exercised its right of 
mercy when defendants have been found guilty 
of this charge. French law also treats infanticide 
as murder; in practise juries find extenuating 
circumstances and acquittals are common. The 
penalty for infanticide in the German code is 
from three years' penal servitude to death. The 
Italian code reduces the penalty from between 
eighteen and twenty years to between three and 
twelve if the child is killed before being entered 
in the civil register, not more than five days after 
birth. 

Child sacrifice is distinct from infanticide, for 
it is not a family arrangement but a public func- 
tion usually ordered by persons other than the 
parents; it bears equally on males and females, 
particularly on first born, instead of last born; 
it knows no age limit; and rather than being per- 
formed for the purpose of keeping down num- 
bers it is often resorted to in order to insure 
further progeny. 

A. M. Hoc ART 

See: ABORTION; BIRTH CONTROI ; POPULATION; ILLE- 
GITIMACY. 

Consult: Lallemand, Le"on, Hittoire des enfants aban- 
donnes et delaisses (Pans 1885), Westermarck, E , The 
Origin and Development of the Moral Idea*, 2 vols. 
(znd ed. London 1912-17) vol. i, p. 393-413, Apte- 
kar, Herbert, Anjea (New York 1931) ch vu, Carr- 
Saunders, A. M., The Population Problem (London 
1922) p. 214-22, 257-62; Cave-Broune, John, Indian 
Infanticide (London 1857), Royal Asiatic Society, 
North China Branch, "The Prevalence of Infanticide 
in China" in Journal, vol. xx (1885) 25-50, Humbert, 
G., "Expositio" in Dictionnaire des antiquites gretques 
et romaines, ed. by C. Daremberg and E. Sagho, \ol. 
11 (Pans 1892) pt. i, p. 930-39, Hefele, C. J., Con- 
cihengeschtchte, 9 vols. (Freiburg i. Br. 185590), tr. 
by W. R. Clark and E. H. Plumptre, 5 \ols. (Edin- 
burgh 187196) vol 11, p 167, Tagiacarne, Gughelmo, 
"Infanticidio, abbandono d'infante e procurato aborto 
nella vita sociale" in Giornale deglt econormsti e rcvista 
di statistica, vol. Ixvi (1925) 401-42, Hartmann, Fritz, 
"Andichtung von Kmdesmord," and Amschl, Alfred, 
"Das Verbrechen des Kmdesmordes nach osterrei- 
chischen Recht" m Archivfur Krimmal-Anthropnlogie 
und Knminalistik, vol. xxi (1905) 49-67, and vol xxx 
(1908) 71-117; New York Public Library, List of 
Works Relating to Criminology (New York 1911). 

INFECTIOUS DISEASES, CONTROL OF. 
See COMMUNICABLE DISEASES, CONTROL OF. 



INFLATION AND DEFLATION. Although 
employed earlier, the terms inflation and de- 
flation did not come into general use until the 
World War. Only with the severe currency dis- 
turbances initiated at that time was anything 
approaching a technical sense applied to them; 
and even now the meaning which an economist 
associates with them is apt to vary in accord- 
ance with his general views regarding the money- 
credit-price mechanism. 

Some use the terms inflation and deflation in 
connection with expansions and contractions of 
currency only; others, with a better knowledge 
of money and banking phenomena, expand them 
to include primarily credit movements; still 
others limit their application to currency and 
credit disturbances connected with price move- 
ments more or less general and violent. In con- 
trast, many associate inflation and deflation 
above all with the movements of foreign exchange 
rates and consequently are inclined to ridicule 
the idea of a gold inflation, however great the 
accompanying credit, currency and price expan- 
sions. Finally, there is in the United States a 
small group who insist on basing the definitions 
largely on the liquidity of banking assets, infla- 
tion increasing as liquidity declines. 

Perhaps the most generally accepted definition 
of inflation is that it is the issue of too much 
money; deflation is commonly taken to mean the 
opposite of inflation the issue of less than 
the right amount of money. The question is thus 
raised as to the standards or norms, the devia- 
tion of the circulating medium from which is 
considered to be either inflation or deflation. 
One group vaguely measures the extent of infla- 
tion or deflation by the deviation of the cir- 
culating medium from "the legitimate needs of 
trade." Sometimes inflation is defined equally 
vaguely as the multiplication of money in rela- 
tion to goods, sometimes as the increase in the 
volume of purchasing power in relation to the 
total volume of transactions. A few refine 
slightly their definitions so as to make infla- 
tion or deflation mean an increase or decrease 
in the circulating medium in relation to "the 
legitimate needs of trade" at some given price 
level. Most of those using the above definitions 
are proponents of the quantity theory or of 
some modification of it; hence such deviations 
are expected to lead to or to support changes 
in the price level. Whether or not price changes 
largely supported by changes in the velocity of 
circulation would be considered as inflation or 
deflation is generally not clear. 



Infanticide Inflation and Deflation 



29 



Some writers go even further and make price 
change the sole criterion of inflation or de- 
flation. Cassel, who has given perhaps the best 
although a far from exact statement of this 
position, maintains: "If no scarcity in commodi- 
ties exists . . . the rise in prices is to be ac- 
counted for as a result of the more plentiful 
supply of currency in other words as a result 
of inflation. The general level of prices, on 
this hypothesis, is a measure of the extent of 
inflation. If a scarcity of commodities sets 
in, ... the rise in prices is thereby intensified. 
But even this further rise in prices may be 
regarded as a result of a too plentiful supply 
of currency and consequently of inflation. . . . 
In both cases the essential point of inflation 
iS a too plentiful supply of currency. In the 
former case we estimate this excess only from 
the standard which prevailed before; in the 
latter case we also take into consideration the 
excess in the supply of currency which arises 
through the former standard being retained even 
after the supply of commodities has diminished" 
(p. 61-62). 

Keynes too makes price change the criterion 
of inflation or deflation; but he distinguishes 
between two types, which affect the economic 
equilibrium quite differently. Changes in the 
price of output as a whole, which measure the 
extent of inflation or deflation, may be re- 
flected in changes either in the cost of production 
per unit (or income per unit) or in profit 
per unit (profit being the difference between 
sales price and cost of production including the 
normal remuneration of entrepreneurs) . A price 
change reflected in income inflation gives entre- 
preneurs no incentive to expand the scope of 
their operations, but a price change reflected 
in profit inflation leads them to attempt ex- 
pansion and results in a tendency toward a boom. 
Thus a stable price level would not necessarily 
maintain business equilibrium. If as a result 
of marked improvements in technique and organ- 
ization the cost of production per unit fell 
while prices were kept stable, profit would ab- 
sorb the difference, at least temporarily, and 
business expansion might result. If, on the 
other hand, prices were kept stable in face of 
higher costs of production, entrepreneurs would 
suffer negative profits and business contraction 
might result. 

An altogether different criterion of inflation 
is advanced by a small group of writers who 
tend to identify inflation with extension of 
bank credit on the basis of unliquid assets. 



According to Laughlin, one of the leaders of 
this school, only price changes resulting from 
monetary factors are to be considered inflation 
or deflation, since price changes caused by a 
scarcity or abundance of goods are only the nat- 
ural and desirable result of such a condition. 
Further no expansion of credit based on liquid 
goods can lead to a rise in prices, as the newly 
created credit is exactly counterbalanced by the 
goods on which it is based. It is only when 
credit is granted on assets which cannot be 
liquidated without loss to repay the loan at 
maturity that credit is depreciated in terms of 
goods and inflation exists. Robertson and others 
pointed out that this coining of even liquid 
goods into money may lead to rising prices as 
the resulting deposits circulate from hand to 
hand. It might be argued further that since the 
liquidity of assets is usually high in periods 
of rising prices and low in periods of falling 
prices, inflation of credit, as Laughlin uses 
the term, would be most conspicuous in a period 
of declining prices; inflation as generally 
understood is of course usually associated with 
rising prices. 

The writers prefer to define inflation (none 
too exactly) as an increase in the general level 
of prices growing out of an increase in expendi- 
tures while goods available for purchase are 
not correspondingly increased in amount. Like- 
wise deflation is defined as a decrease in the 
general level of prices growing out of a de- 
crease in expenditures while goods available for 
purchase are not correspondingly decreased in 
amount. Unfortunately in the present state of 
knowledge the relative importance of different 
factors in price change cannot be ascertained. 
It cannot even be said that all price changes 
have the same significance; some may lead to 
economic disequilibrium while others may be 
necessary to maintain equilibrium. Keynes has 
attempted, although not yet entirely success- 
fully, to distinguish these changes. 

In the past, major instances of inflation seem 
always to have been associated with government 
finance. An increase in government expenditures 
even if unusually large does not of itself lead 
to inflation provided the government finances 
itself by taxation. Under such conditions the 
increased demand for goods and services on the 
part of the government is approximately counter- 
balanced by decreased means of purchase on the 
part of its citizens. A rise of prices is not, how- 
ever, excluded: it is possible that citizens will 
secure additional credit to avoid too large a 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



30 

reduction in their expenditures. Yet inflation 
initiated by governments with balanced budgets 
is rare. In a period of war, when military re- 
quirements necessitate huge and sudden in- 
creases in government expenditures, it has usually 
been found inexpedient on economic as well as 
on political grounds to raise more than a small 
portion of the newly needed revenues through 
taxation. In such cases resort may be had to 
loans from private investors or banks or even to 
the direct issue of government paper money. 

If loans from private citizens are relied 
upon, the effect may or may not be inflationary, 
according to the conditions of the borrowing. If 
each individual who lends to the government 
curtails his own expenditures by an amount ex- 
actly equal to the sum lent, total expenditures 
will not thereby be increased. The chief result 
will be a redistribution of the demand for goods. 
Whether or not price indices change would 
depend upon the articles included in the index 
and the extent of individual price changes 
resulting from the redistribution of demand. 
In most instances, however, individuals do not 
decrease their expenditures by amounts equal to 
the sums lent to the government. The unwilling- 
ness suddenly to change spending habits, the 
need of expanding production to satisfy in- 
creased demand by the military, the possession 
of highly acceptable collateral in the form of 
government securities and the usual liberal dis- 
count policy at the banks lead government credi- 
tors to restore the funds at their disposal at 
least partially by borrowing from the banks on 
the basis of the purchased government securi- 
ties. If these bank loans are not offset by de- 
creased loans of other types, the result is a 
net addition to bank credit likely to be used to 
demand goods. 

The World War finances of the United States 
government furnish an excellent example of this 
type of inflation. Individuals were encouraged 
to "borrow and buy" government securities. To 
the extent that banks loaned on these securities 
without reducing their other earning assets the 
effect was much the same as it would have been 
had they loaned the same amount directly to the 
government. Gold exports were forbidden ex- 
cept under special permit. Reserve requirements 
of member banks were lowered and all reserves 
were required to be held at the Federal Reserve 
Banks; thus most of the reserve money of the 
country was concentrated in the central banks 
and the basis of credit expansion was much en- 
larged. At the same time rediscount rates were 



kept low and member banks were encouraged to 
borrow on government security collateral at a 
preferential rate of interest. 

If a government decides to finance its opera- 
tions either wholly or partially by an expansion 
of bank credit or by increased paper money 
issues or by both, the sums it must raise will 
depend partly on the volume of goods and serv- 
ices needed and partly on price movements. If 
the prices of the goods which it purchases move 
slightly or not at all, the government will be 
able to balance its budget with relatively smaller 
issues. If these prices rise in direct proportion 
to the increase in the circulating media, the 
new funds required to purchase the same 
physical volume of goods will increase corre- 
spondingly. If, however, as is frequently thts 
case, prices increase faster than the circulat- 
ing media, the treasury may find that every 
inflationary attempt to balance its budget tends 
to create a greater deficit. 

Major instances of inflation show that al- 
though the movements of circulation and prices 
are in general in the same direction, wide fluc- 
tuations in one may occur with only retarded 
and disproportionate or even dissimilar changes 
in the other. Perhaps more surprising is the 
fact that during such inflations the movements 
of prices tend to be far more correlated with the 
movements of foreign exchange rates than 
with circulation. The relationship between 
prices, circulation and foreign exchanges may b*e 
illustrated by the history of the World War and 
post-war inflations in France and Germany. 

Soon after the outbreak of the war the French 
government, unable to raise sufficient funds by 
taxation and private loans, was forced to make 
up the difference by borrowing from the Bank of 
France. Throughout the inflation period these 
loans increased almost continually and by large 
amounts as receipts from other sources became 
more and more inadequate. Commercial loans 
instead of falling off to balance the increase of 
treasury loans rose as the lag of production 
costs behind prices increased commercial prof- 
its. At the very beginning of the inflation the 
increase of circulation may conceivably have 
preceded the rise of prices, but soon thereafter 
prices began to rise earlier and faster; it was 
only in 1926 during the last stages of the in- 
flation that circulation did not lag perceptibly. 
Although prices probably moved slightly ahead 
of foreign exchange rates from 1919 to 1923 and 
exchange rates slightly ahead of prices from 
1923 to 1926 during much of the period they 



Inflation and Deflation 



moved approximately simultaneously, with a 
slight tendency for exchange to precede. The 
lag of circulation behind both prices and ex- 
change rates led to an insistence on the part 
of the French that the increase in circulation 
did not cause the rise in prices but was itself 
caused by the price rise as the existing circu- 
lation became inadequate to meet the needs of 
government and industry. In fact the increase 
in government purchases led to increased busi- 
ness activity and to price rises and these in 
turn to currency expansion as fast as the gov- 
ernment warrants were cashed into notes of the 
Bank of France. 

The German war and post-war inflation paral- 
leled in many respects that of France. Shortly 
after the outbreak of the war the Reichsbank 
was allowed to suspend specie payments and to 
substitute discounted treasury bills for com- 
mercial bills as non-cash cover for its notes. 
Although the government had borrowed large 
sums from the Reichsbank and the latter's notes 
had increased considerably, the extent of infla- 
tion at the end of the war was not greater than 
that in several other of the belligerent countries. 
In the post-war period, however, large repara- 
tions payments and other heavy expenses made 
impossible politically if not economically 
the balancing of the budget, thus necessitating 
heavy inflationary borrowing from the Reichs- 
bank. Even more than in France the movements 
of prices seem to have preceded in time and ex- 
ceeded in extent the movements of circulation. 
As a contributing factor to the price rise the ve- 
locity of circulation showed a great increase, 
especially in the period of most rapid inflation. 
Evidently people were attempting quickly to ex- 
change their money for goods in order to escape 
further loss of purchasing power. Although as in 
France the correlation between their movements 
was high, during most of the period prices 
showed a noticeable lag behind foreign exchange 
rates. With this tendency of prices to follow ex- 
change and to increase more rapidly than circu- 
lation the government was forced to borrow in 
progressively larger amounts in order to get 
needed supplies. From industry too came the in- 
sistence that there was a shortage of credit and 
money and that instead of causing the price rise 
the increased volume of notes was itself made 
necessary by previous price advances. 

The fact that during inflations the rise of 
prices tends to exceed the increase in currency 
is directly connected with the increase in the 
velocities of circulation of all types of cur- 



rency: people attempt to reduce to the minimum 
the amount of funds on hand in order to escape 
the loss due to depreciation. Another explana- 
tion suggested by the fairly steady lag of cir- 
culation behind prices is the fact that prices of 
goods purchased on credit or manufactured 
to order are recorded two or three months before 
currency is needed to close the transaction. 
In countries where deposit currency is used in 
all business transactions of any magnitude the 
lead of the general index of wholesale prices 
over the issue of banknotes and paper money for 
hand to hand circulation may correspond roughly 
to the lead of wholesale prices over retail 
prices and wages. 

One explanation of the close relationship be- 
tween prices and foreign exchange rates is 
offered by the purchasing power parity theory 
championed in recent years by Cassel. Since, 
according to him, a monetary unit as such, that 
is, apart from its value as a commodity, has 
no utility other than its power to command goods 
in exchange, the demand for currency of country 
A in exchange for currency of country B is sim- 
ply an offer to exchange purchasing power in one 
of the countries for that in the other. There- 
fore the valuation of one currency in terms of 
the other will depend upon the relative purchas- 
ing power of the two currencies in their own 
countries. Following this line of reasoning 
Cassel contends that apart from slight fluctua- 
tions the exchange rate between the currencies 
of two countries will remain unaltered so long 
as no variations take place in the purchasing 
power of either currency and no obstacles 
are placed in the way of trade. Should inflation 
occur in country A and the purchasing power of 
its currency be consequently reduced, the value 
of currency A in country B will necessarily fall 
in like proportion. If at the same time currency 
B has undergone inflation, the valuation of cur- 
rency A in terms of currency B will as a conse- 
quence rise in corresponding degree. Cassel 
arrives thus at the following rule: "When two 
currencies have undergone inflation, the normal 
rate of exchange will be equal to the old rate 
multiplied by the quotient of the degree of in- 
flation in the one country and in the other" (p. 
140). He recognized that underlying his rule 
is the assumption that the prices of articles 
for export move in the same degree as the gen- 
eral price index. If the prices of exports rise 
more than the general price index, the country's 
money will buy correspondingly less of the for- 
eign currency; but if the prices of a country's 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



32 

exports rise less than internal prices, its money 
will buy correspondingly more of the foreign 
currency. 

This theory has been subjected to severe criti- 
cism on several points. Kcyncs states that it 
is only a truism to say that the relative value 
of two currencies can be derived by finding 
their relative purchasing power over goods en- 
tering into trade between the nations involved, 
but he would deny validity to the assertion that 
rates of exchange can be found by comparing 
comprehensive indices of internal purchasing 
power. The observed similarity between actual 
exchange rates and theoretical purchasing power 
parities arrived at by comparing wholesale price 
indices he would explain largely by the fact that 
those indices as at present constructed are domi- 
nated by articles enjoyingan international market. 

Nogaro points out that as goods purchased in 
international trade can often be produced at 
home only at prohibitive or very high costs, 
Cassel's contention that merchants will refuse 
to purchase a currency quoted above its purchas- 
ing power parity is too strict to be tenable. He 
prefers the older, less strict and in his opinion 
more nearly tenable theory that if foreign 
exchange rates rise faster than prices, exports 
will be encouraged and imports discouraged, 
thus tending to restore the balance of payments 
and to reduce the disparity between price and 
exchange movements. Further he denies the 
existence of a purchasing power parity, from 
which any deviation will set into operation in- 
fluences tending to restore the norm. Internal 
prices are not fixed by factors independent of 
exchange rates. If foreign exchange rates rise 
faster than prices, the cost of imports in terms 
of home currency rises. At the same time the 
high price obtainable for bills of foreign ex- 
change raises the price of exportable goods in 
the home market. Certain psychological effects 
may also ensue. Considering the rise in foreign 
exchange as evidence of probable future price 
increases, consumers may hasten to exchange 
their money for goods. Sellers instead of basing 
sales prices on actual cost or on cost of replace- 
ment may base them on prevailing or even ex- 
pected future exchange rates a practise com- 
mon in Germany during the period of most rapid 
inflation. Thus a rise of exchange rates above 
the purchasing power parity resulting from ex- 
change speculation or from any other factor in 
the balance of payments may serve to draw in- 
ternal prices with it and thereby establish a new 
purchasing power parity. Nogaro also points out 



that this tendency of internal prices to move with 
exchange rates prevents the automatic adjust- 
ment of the balance of payments which would 
result from the encouragement of exports and 
from the discouragement of imports and hence 
to that extent fails to stabilize exchange. 

Of the evils of rapid inflation there can be 
little doubt. Although for some time the rise of 
selling prices above costs increases profits and 
stimulates production, when inflation becomes 
extremely rapid entrepreneurs often hesitate 
to enter into contracts drawn in money and 
production becomes deranged. Long term credi- 
tors find their claims virtually wiped out, and the 
amount of new capital offered for long term in- 
vestment soon declines. The banks do a rushing 
business in extending short term loans despite 
the rise in interest rates. During progressive in- 
flation, however, the rise of the market rate of 
interest compensates but slightly for the depre- 
ciation of the principal; business enterprises 
are thus not only largely relieved of their 
bonded indebtedness but are tendered a con- 
tinuous subsidy by the banking system of the 
country. The victims of inflation are those 
whose money incomes do not rise as fast as 
prices; creditors, salaried workers and wage 
earners find their real incomes reduced as the 
monetary unit loses purchasing power. 

The end of inflation is usually marked by 
credit stringency and numerous bankruptcies. 
The ensuing scramble for liquidity intensifies 
the liquidation of both business and banks, until 
in turn the volume of credit and prices are re- 
duced far below their otherwise normal levels. 
Only by drastic measures, which are rarely ap- 
plied except by accident, has the downward 
movement been speedily checked. With the de- 
cline of prices come decreased production and a 
shift in distribution. Recipients of fixed incomes, 
wage earners, salaried workers and creditors find 
that their money incomes have greater purchasing 
power than before. This gain may be more than 
balanced, however, by loss of employment and 
defaults in payments. Entrepreneurs and debtors, 
on the other hand, find their incomes greatly de- 
creased and their obligations harder to pay. 

While major inflations receive their impetus 
from treasury needs and are later fostered by 
business expansion, minor inflations commonly 
occur during the upswing of the business cycle. 
Although inflations characteristic of recurring 
periods of prosperity never attain the heights 
reached during inflations fostered by govern- 
ments they follow a similar course. Some occur- 



Inflation and Deflation Ingersoll 



rence or group of occurrences leads to actual 
or prospective profits. Expansion of operations 
and of borrowing ensues, which gradually be- 
comes more general and further increases prof- 
its. With new and increased loans made to prof- 
itable and expanding business a rise in prices is 
sure soon to follow. Inflation has thus made its 
appearance through normal business processes. 
As in the major cases, the end is frequently set 
by the limitation of credit either at home or 
abroad; liquidation and usually deflation ensue. 
JAMFS HARVKY ROGIRS 
LESTER V. CHANDLLR 

See MONEY; COINAGF; PAPFR MONLY, CURRENCY; 
BANKING, COMMERCIAL; FOREIGN EXCHANGF, WAR 
FINANCE; BUSINESS CYCLI-S, Diur, SIAUII I/AFION, 
BUTINLSS; PRICE SIAHILIZATION; CI-NIRAL BANKING; 
MONETARY STABILIZATION. 

Consult: Cassel, Gustav, Money and Foreign E\ihange 
after 1914 (London 1922), Pigou, A C , "Inflation" 
in Economic Journal, vol. xxvn (1917) 486-94, Rohert- 
son, D. H , Money (new ed London 1928), Keynes, 
J. M., Monetary Reform (New York 1924), and A 
Treatise on Money, 2 vols (London 1930) vol i, ch xi, 
Laughhn, J. Laurence, Money ami Pntes (New York 
1919) ch v, and Ctedit of the Nations (New York 
1918), Palyi, M., "Das Wesen der Inflation" mllaupt- 
probleme der Soziologu" Ennnerungtgahe fur Max 
Weber, ed. by M Palyi, 2 vols (Munich 1923) vol. 
ii, p. 341-52; Nogaro, B., La monnaie et Ics pheno- 
menes monetaires contemporaries (Pans 1924), tr. as 
Modern Monetary Systems (London 1927), Aftahon, 
A., Monnaie, pnx et change (Pans 1927) pt n; I law- 
trey, R. G , Trade and Credit (London 1928) ch iv, 
and Currency and Credit (3rd ed London 1928); 
Academy of Political Science, "Inflation and High 
Prices," Proceedings, vol. ix, no. i (New York 1920); 
Elster, Karl, Von der Mark zur Rnchvnark (Jena 
1928); Graham, Frank D , Exchange, Prices and Pro- 
duction in Hyper-inflation: Germany, 1 9201 Q2J 
(Princeton 1930); Eulenburg, Fran/, "Die sozialen 
Wirkungen der Wahrungsverhdltmsbe" mjahrhucher 
fur Nationalokononne und Statistik, 3rd ser., vol Ixvii 
(1924) 748-94, Rogers, James Harvey, The Ptoceis of 
Inflation in France, 1914-1927 (New York 1929); 
Dulles, E. L, The French Franc, 1911-1928 (New 
York 1929); Frayssmet, Pierre, La politique monetaire 
de la France (1914-1928) (Pans 1928). 

INGENIEROS, JOSE (1877-1925), Argen- 
tinian psychiatrist and sociologist. Ingenieros, 
who holds a commanding position in Latin 
American thought, elaborated the economic in- 
terpretation of history traditional in Argentina 
by ultimately explaining economic behavior in 
terms of biological processes. From this point of 
view he wrote on the living and working condi- 
tions of the proletariat and on the history and 
thought of Argentina. In his approach to the 
problems of psychology and philosophy he was 



33 

neopositivist. He condemned mediocrity but 
recognized the part played by the average man 
in preserving and transmitting the variations 
useful for the continuity of the social group. In 
criminology, which was his earliest sociological 
interest, he is best known for his classification of 
delinquents, which categorized criminals ac- 
cording to whether their delinquency was asso- 
ciated with the intellect, the feeling or the will. 
He was critical of the value of Spanish culture in 
South America, opposed Pan-Americanism as an 
instrument of imperialism and led a group which 
turned its intellectual sympathies from France 
to Soviet Russia. The Union Latino-Americana, 
established in 1925, was a result of a campaign 
which he initiated. In addition to his many 
stimulating and widely read books in all fields of 
the social sciences he founded and edited the 
Archivos de psiquiatria y criminologia, medicina 
legal (12 vols., Buenos Aires 1902-13) and the 
Rcvhta de filosofia (1915- ), which is still pub- 
lished. 

C. BERNALDO DE QUIROS 

Important zvorks: Simulation de la locura ante la cri- 
minologta (Buenos Aires 1903, 8th ed. 1918); Lasimula- 
cion en la lucha por la vida (Buenos Aires 1903, i2th 
ed. 1920), La cnnnnologia (Buenos Aires 1911, 7th ed. 
1919), El dcterminnmo economic o en la evolution amen- 
cana (Buenos Aires 1901; 7th ed. with title Sociologia 
argcntina, 1918), Pnmiptos de psicologla biologica 
(Buenos Aires 1911), El hombre mediocre (Madrid 
I 9 I 3> 3 r( l ed. Buenos Aires 1917); Hacia una moral sin 
dogmas (Buenos Aires 1917, 2nd ed. 1919), Ciencia y 
filowfia ((Madrid 1917), Proposiciones relativas al 
porremr de la filosofia (Buenos Aires 1918); La n'olu- 
ci6n de las ideas atgentinas, 2 vols. (Buenos Aires 1918- 
20); Los t tempos nuevos (Madrid 1921, 2nd ed Buenos 
Aires 1925), Lasfuerzas morales (Buenos Aires 1925, 
2nd ed. 1926). 

Consult. Nosotros, vol. li (1925) 421702; "Jos 
Ingenieros su vida y su ohra" in Revista de filosofia, 
vol. xxiu (1926) 1-231; Mouchet, E., and Palcos, Al- 
berto, "La obra psicologica de Jos6 Ingenieros," and 
Moreau, G S , "Las ideas sociales de Ingenieros" in 
Humamdades, vol \u (1926) 157-85, 187-229; Endara, 
Julio, Jose Ingenieros y el porremr de la filosofia (2nd 
ed. Buenos Aires 1921); Veyga, Francisco de, In- 
genieros, Jos, Mouchet, Enrique, and Palcos, Al- 
berto, articles in Inter-America . . . English, vol ix 
(1925-26) 37I-9L 

INGERSOLL, ROBERT GREEN (1833-99), 
American lawyer and lecturer on agnosticism. 
Born at Dresden, New York, the son of a Con- 
gregational minister, Ingersoll spent his boyhood 
in small town parsonages in his native state and 
in Ohio and Illinois. He was admitted to the bar 
in 1854, entered Illinois local politics as a Demo- 
crat and saw brief service in the Civil War as 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



34 

colonel of the Eleventh Illinois Cavalry (Volun- 
teers). In 1863, having resigned from the army 
following his capture and parole, Ingersoll re- 
sumed the practise of law and joined the Repub- 
lican party. He immediately attained fame as a 
lawyer and was especially noted for his ability in 
rapidly assimilating a brief and for his skill in 
gracious but devastating examination of wit- 
nesses. As leading counsel for the defendants in 
the notorious "Star Route" trials he performed 
one of the outstanding legal feats of the second 
half of the nineteenth century by securing their 
acquittal in 1883. 

For a whole generation because of his great 
oratorical gifts and his enthusiastic acceptance of 
the tenets of Republicanism Ingersoll was one of 
the chief adornments of his party. At the 
nominating convention of 1876 his designation 
of Elaine as a "plumed knight" almost saved the 
day for his candidate. He campaigned for Gar- 
field. His violent attacks on the leveling doc- 
trines of Bryan in 1896, his defense of the war 
with Spain and his acceptance of McKinley 's ex- 
pansionist program put the stamp of approval, 
for many, on the newly developed capitalistic- 
imperialistic policies of the Republican party. 
Ingersoll might well have attained high public 
office had it not been for his radical religious 
beliefs; his conservative views on political 
and economic questions made his social accepta- 
bility assured. 

It was as a foe of religious orthodoxy that In- 
gersoll was best known. For thirty years, us- 
ing the lecture platform largely as his medium 
and talking before great assemblages, he ex- 
pounded with great force and eloquence a 
simple agnostic creed the chief articles of which 
were a protest against the doctrine of eternal 
punishment, a denial of the certainty of the 
existence of God and a rejection of the inspired 
character of the Old Testament. These orations 
were singularly effective and succeeded in shak- 
ing the faith of thousands. Not an original 
scholar, he had an alert and absorptive mind and 
was familiar with the popular scientific writings 
of his day, particularly those of Huxley, and with 
the higher Biblical criticism. He selected as his 
own guiding principles those of "observation, 
reason and experience." On the other hand, he 
did not concern himself with the part played by 
organized religion in the support of dominant 
economic and political groups. Among Inger- 
soll's more notable lectures were "Some Mistakes 
ofMoses,""TheGods,""TheGhosts,""Super- 
stition," "The Truth," "Some Reasons Why," 



"The Foundations of Faith," "What Is Reli- 
gion?" "The Liberty of Man, Woman and 
Child." 

HARRY E. BARNES 

Works: The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, 12 vols. (New 
York 1900). 

Consult: Kittredge, Herman E., Ingersoll: a Biograph- 
ical Appreciation (New York 1911); Rogers, Cameron, 
Colonel Bob Ingersoll (New York 1927); Baker, Isaac 
Newton, An Intimate View of Robert G. Ingersoll (New 
York 1920); Smith, Edward Garstin, The Life and 
Reminiscences of Robert G. Ingersoll (New York 1904); 
Dibble, R. F., "The Devil's Advocate" in American 
Mercury, vol. iii (1924) 6470. 

INGRAM, JOHN KELLS (1823-1907), Irish 
scholar and sociologist. For the major part of his 
life Ingram was connected with Trinity College, 
Dublin, where he was successively scholar, fel- 
low, professor of oratory and English literature, 
professor of Greek, librarian and senior fellow. 
He wrote on mathematical, statistical, philolog- 
ical and literary subjects and also published a 
volume of poems. But he is chiefly important as 
an economist and sociologist. After studying the 
writings of Comte he became at the age of 
twenty-eight a convinced positivist. His main 
works in this field are devoted to an exposition of 
positivist views on ethics and religion in their 
relation to society. They include Outlines of the 
History of Religion (London 1900), Human Na- 
ture and Morals According to Auguste Comte 
(London 1 90 1), Practical Morals (London 1904), 
The Final Transition (London 1905) as well as 
Passages from the Letters of Auguste Comte (Lon- 
don 1901). 

Ingram's conception of economics was largely 
determined by his positivist sympathies. He con- 
sidered orthodox political economy as repre- 
sented, for example, by Cairnes to be at fault 
in that it tried to study wealth in isolation from 
other social phenomena, was abstract and in- 
humane, deductive and unhistorical. In his view 
economics should be treated as merely a part of 
"sociology" the empirical study of the evolu- 
tion of social life and institutions in general. In 
opposition to the German historical school he 
held that such a study need not be confined to 
description; it could formulate laws, not indeed 
of static equilibrium but of changing develop- 
ment. This thesis he first enunciated in his ad- 
dress to the British Association in 1878, pub- 
lished the same year as Present Position and 
Prospects of Political Economy (London 1878). It 
is implied throughout his History of Political 
Economy (Edinburgh 1888, republished from 



Ingersoll Inheritance 



his article in the ninth edition of the Encyclopae- 
dia Britannica, vol. xix, 1885; new ed. with sup- 
plementary chapter by W. A. Scott and intro- 
duction by Richard T. Ely, London 1915), which 
constituted the first comprehensive and authori- 
tative history of economic doctrine in English. 
These two works, although exaggerating the 
interdependence of the social sciences, were 
nevertheless influential along with the writings 
of Ingrain's fellow countryman Cliffe Leslie in 
broadening the basis of economic studies 
throughout the world. In the United States they 
provided one of the chief sources of inspiration 
for Richard T. Ely and the "new school of eco- 
nomics." Ingram also wrote a History of Slavery 
and Serfdom (London 1895). 
LINDLEY M. FRASER 

Works: A complete bibliography of Ingram 's writings 
has been published by T. W. Lyster (Dublin 1909). 
Consult: Falkmer, C L., "A Memoir of the Late John 
Kells Ingram" in Statistical and Social Inquiry Soci- 
ety of Ireland, Journal, vol. xn (1906-12) 105-24; 
Keynes, J. N , Scope and Method of Political Economy 
(4th ed. London 1917). 

INHERITANCE is the entry of living persons 
into the possession of dead persons' property 
and exists in some form wherever the institution 
of private property is recogni/ed as the basis of 
the social and economic system. But the actual 
forms of inheritance and the laws and customs 
governing it differ very greatly from country to 
country and from time to time. There is no 
"natural" law or principle of inheritance, which 
is essentially a changing thing, based on the 
changing forms of economic and social organiza- 
tion; for the special laws and customs governing 
inheritance are always and everywhere part and 
parcel of the general structure of property rela- 
tionships. Changed ways of owning and using 
property will always bring with them in the long 
run alterations in the laws and practises relating 
to the inheritance of wealth. 

Unless there is private property, owned or 
possessed by individuals, the question of in- 
heritance hardly arises. For whereas an indi- 
vidual dies and his property, if he has any, has 
to be disposed of in one way or another, a group, 
such as a clan or tribe or family, does not die. 
Members die and are replaced by new members 
in the common enjoyment of the property of the 
group. The property itself, however, never 
changes hands or needs to be disposed of. 
Under such conditions there is no inheritance, 
in the sense in which the word is used in this 
article, because the group is conceived of as the 



35 

repository of the right of possession. This is one 
reason why inheritance plays a very small part 
in the life or laws of most primitive societies. 
The group holds in common and is tenacious of 
its rights. The individual does not hold but only 
shares in the use; and accordingly, when he dies, 
there is nothing for anyone else to inherit. 

Even when there is in primitive societies in- 
dividual property of a sort it can seldom be in- 
herited. For where most property is group 
property, what is recognized as a man's own is 
usually limited to things so personal to himself 
that it would appear impious to hand them over 
to another at his death. His weapons, his simple 
tools and utensils are thought of as extensions of 
his own personality, as in modern times Hegel 
and other philosophers have thought of property 
over a far wider field. As part of his personality 
they are often to be burned or buried with him; 
and this tendency is the stronger because it is 
commonly believed that the dead will have need 
of them in another world. The deceased must 
take his means of creation and expression of his 
personality with him to the other world; and 
consequently no one else may inherit them in 
this. The very idea of inheritance in any shape 
or form is slow to develop in societies where 
private property scarcely exists. 

But as fast as private property develops, and 
especially as soon as it touches the means of 
production beyond mere tools of a craftsman's 
trade, inheritance comes with it. Indeed property 
in the sense of ownership is not essential; it is 
enough that there should be private possession 
and use, for rights over things can be passed 
from the dead to the living as well as things 
themselves. There is a right to succeed to a 
tenancy as well as to the ownership of a farm; 
and many forms of inheritance are in effect suc- 
cessions to rights and sometimes to duties rather 
than to things. This is obviously true of heredi- 
tary titles and offices as well as of many forms of 
feudal and similar tenure. Indeed in one sense 
all inheritance is of rights or duties; and these 
rights and duties are only sometimes embodied 
in material things. 

The inheritance laws and customs of societies 
are apt to be most complicated where they are 
still based, in part at least, on a lingering sense of 
group possession or ownership. Complete free- 
dom to bequeath property or to give it away 
during a man's lifetime can develop only under 
social and economic conditions based on highly 
individualistic notions about property. A thing 
must be absolutely a man's own in a most indi- 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



vidual sense for him to have a full right to give 
or bequeath it to whom he will. Indeed only 
among English speaking peoples, where in 
general only dower or similar rights created by 
statute limit free disposal by the testator, does 
full freedom of bequest exist today or has it ever 
existed; and even in their case it is fairly modern, 
a product of an increasingly individualistic eco- 
nomic system. It does not exist in Scotland even 
now or wholly in the United States; and there is 
no continental country in Europe that even ap- 
proaches it. Everywhere except in England and 
in countries which have borrowed their legal in- 
stitutions largely from England property still re- 
tains something of a group character. It is not 
purely personal, and it has functions apart from 
the purposes of its possessor for the time. 

This is most clearly seen in such institutions 
as the legitim, the legally enforceable claim of 
widows and children to at least a part of a dead 
husband's or father's estate. The legitim takes 
many different forms but it exists in some form 
and degree in the great majority of countries, in- 
cluding South American and important Euro- 
pean states, exclusive of Russia, and Louisiana in 
the United States. Nor is it reasonable to regard 
it simply as a restriction on the right of bequest; 
for that would imply free disposal of property by 
will or gift to be the natural and obvious thing. 
It is so far from being natural or obvious, how- 
ever, that it has never occurred to the great 
majority of mankind that it ought to be the main 
way of disposing of property. On the contrary, 
in all peasant countries there is still a strong 
tendency to think of real property at least as 
belonging to the family rather than the indi- 
vidual. It is the family's means of life, from 
which no member can be shut out except for 
positive misconduct. Property is no longer com- 
mon to the family, as it used to be to the clan or 
tribe; but neither is it purely the personal prop- 
erty of the head of the family. 

Naturally the notion of a group right or claim 
clings most tenaciously to forms of property 
which the group actually uses as instruments of 
production. The more property ceases to have 
this character and takes the form of money or 
shares in undertakings which are not purely 
family affairs, the less the group feeling remains 
attached to it. The family's claim to money or to 
shares in a joint stock concern is far less deeply 
rooted in tradition and seems far less compelling 
than its claim upon the family estate as a means 
of life. Townsmen in India often exist on pit- 
tances derived from the family land, which is 



regarded as charged with the maintenance of all 
the members. Even where property takes a 
money form or that of paper claims on the earn- 
ings of businesses outside the family's control, 
the notion of the estate as a group possession 
usually dies hard. It is not dead even in England 
or the United States; there it asserts itself not 
only in the laws governing intestacy but also 
even more powerfully in social custom, in- 
fluencing the wills men actually make, even 
when they have full legal freedom to make what 
wills they like. 

Modern forms of economic organization are 
very powerful solvents of the group notion of 
property, for they tend to make the claims to in- 
come arising out of property divisible without 
the need for dividing the property itself. Tihe 
chief argument against the legitim in most of its 
forms is that it tends to a more and more minute 
subdivision of property. Where landed property 
is the chief form of wealth, this may have very 
serious results not only in the breaking up of 
large estates but also in the subdivision of 
peasant holdings to a point which makes agricul- 
tural improvements impossible and reduces 
holdings to a size too small to admit of a toler- 
able standard of life. The institution of primo- 
geniture has been upheld mainly on the ground 
that it keeps estates and agricultural holdings 
together, thereby making possible their more 
efficient development for the production of 
wealth. When, however, property comes* to 
consist largely of stocks and shares, the argu- 
ments against division have far less force. In 
public companies and corporations the parceling 
out of the shares among a larger number of 
holders has little effect upon management; even 
in the case of family businesses charges can be 
made on the net earnings for different members 
of the family, and where such a business is 
turned, as now often occurs, into a private com- 
pany, actual shares can be issued and the busi- 
ness still carried on without change of policy. It 
can be urged that the setting up of charges on 
the business or the diffusion of the ownership of 
shares makes the accumulation of capital out of 
reserved profits harder than it would be if the 
whole business were inherited by a single 
owner. But this is only one aspect of the wider 
argument that great inequalities of wealth and 
income are necessary for the adequate accumu- 
lation of capital in modern societies. In general 
there is no doubt that the institution of share- 
holding in joint stock concerns as the outstand- 
ing form of property ownership has made far 



Inheritance 



37 



easier and less open to economic objection the 
diffusion of estates at their owners' deaths. 

This diffusion tends to a more individualistic 
conception of property rights; for, save in the 
special case of businesses which retain their 
family character, the divided property loses all 
unity and becomes simply part of the separate 
estates of the various inheritors. It may still be 
regarded as the duty of the richer members of 
the family to help maintain the poorer; but this 
becomes a purely social duty, unconnected with 
the conception of a family estate charged with 
the maintenance of all the members. Only in 
the case of landed estates does this notion retain 
any force in developed industrial societies and 
even there it has been greatly undermined. In 
peasant societies, on the other hand, the idea of 
the family holding as charged with the family 
maintenance still retains great force. Often most 
of the family are driven or impelled to go away 
and work elsewhere, as factory hands or laborers 
or in a higher stratum of society as doctors, civil 
servants or lawyers. But even when they have 
left the family property, the notion of its re- 
sponsibility for helping them in adversity sur- 
vives with almost undiminished force. 

In modern industrialized societies, where the 
conception of property has become highly indi- 
vidual and the family survives as a social rather 
than an economic institution, the tendency has 
ben to leave inheritance as free as possible from 
regulation by the state and therefore to extend 
continuously the right of unfettered bequest. 
The state has still to postulate what is to happen 
in cases of intestacy, but with the increase of the 
will making habit, fostered both by the growth 
of education and by the enlarged freedom of 
bequest, intestacy becomes of less practical im- 
portance. Most people with anything consider- 
able to leave do dispose of their property by will, 
and in most English speaking countries they are 
left a very wide discretion practically complete 
freedom to carry out their wishes. 

In the early nineteenth century, in England at 
any rate, freedom of bequest came to be widely 
regarded as an integral part of laissez faire. The 
classical economists, especially McCulloch, 
argued strongly against the legitim and in favor 
of primogeniture as a social institution, on the 
double ground that division of property operated 
against its efficient exploitation and that the dis- 
inheriting of younger children gave them the 
maximum incentive to make their own way in 
the world. A secure competence they regarded 
as disastrous both for society and for the indi- 



vidual who enjoyed it; and they urged that men 
would be spurred on to make the best use of 
their powers only by need and by emulation of 
the rich. Inequality was defended as a means to 
the accumulation of capital and primogeniture 
favored on the ground that although it might be 
bad for the heir by making him lazy it was good 
for the younger children and the community. 
According to McCulloch it was a positive privi- 
lege to be disinherited; but it never entered his 
head that the best thing would be to disinherit 
everybody. 

Although primogeniture was favored, there 
was no desire to enforce it by law; for freedom of 
disposition by will was regarded as a necessary 
incentive to the accumulation of capital and it 
was intended that the father should be able to 
leave his property away from his children, thus 
having the whip hand over them while he lived 
and the authority to induce in them virtuous and 
industrious habits. The object was to give men 
the greatest possible incentive not only to make 
but also to save money; and this would be best 
secured by putting what they made and saved 
absolutely at their free disposal. Despite Jeremy 
Bentham's pleas for limitation of inheritance the 
nineteenth century doctrine of property and in- 
heritance developed in England on purely indi- 
vidual lines in strict keeping with the philosophy 
of laissez faire. In this field as in many others it 
was left for John Stuart Mill to go back on the 
classical tradition and to propose in addition to 
some restrictions on the right of bequest a severe 
limitation of the sum which any one individual 
would be allowed to inherit from any source. 
Mill is hesitant, for he is impressed with the un- 
desirabihty of doing anything to check capital 
accumulation. But he also dislikes and desires to 
reduce inequality and his wish is at several 
points the forerunner of modern doctrines deal- 
ing with taxes on inheritance. 

Before Mill the question of inheritance was 
considered, except by the socialists, almost 
solely in relation to the accumulation of capital 
and the efficient use of productive resources and 
hardly at all as a problem of social justice. In 
Mill the two points of view are in conflict; and 
from his time the question has always to be con- 
sidered from both standpoints. On the one hand, 
inheritance and freedom of bequest are de- 
fended as necessary incentives to saving and as 
means to the more effective use of capital; for, 
given freedom of bequest, it is held that men 
will tend to leave their capital in such ways as to 
promote its effective use. On the other hand, in- 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



hcritance is attacked as one of the greatest 
sources of social and economic inequality and 
proposals arc made to limit or even to abolish it 
in order to secure a better distribution of income. 
Abolition of inheritance, however, can hardly 
be urged as a self-contained and sufficient re- 
form, for if property is to lapse to the state at its 
owner's death, and that is what abolition in- 
volves, the state will have either to make use of it 
for production under collective control or to let 
it out to the individuals who seem best qualified 
to use it. The former is the socialist solution; the 
latter has been urged by various small groups 
from time to time and is urged today by the fol- 
lowers of Rudolf Stcincr. In cither case the 
abolition of inheritance involves a radical change 
in the economic as well as the social system and 
especially new methods both of accumulating 
and of using capital. It would also involve, at 
any rate in the first generation, some restrictions 
on gifts inter vivos, such as a real enforcement of 
the legitim also demands; but whether such re- 
strictions would remain necessary after the first 
generation would depend on the opportunities 
for fresh capital accumulation still left to the 
individual. 

There can be no doubt that under any socialist 
system, even if it fell far short of communist 
thoroughness, the right of inheritance would be 
in practise very severely restricted, for with the 
instruments of production in the hands of the 
state the chief means and therewith also the 
need of private accumulation would be gone. 
The accumulation of capital would clearly be- 
come a collective function of society. Incomes 
would be distributed after subtracting the 
amounts needed for the provision of new capital 
equipment; and they would be meant for spend- 
ing, not for saving. Inheritance would thus be 
restricted at most to things of use and could not 
include instruments of production, except dur- 
ing a period of transition. Probably even within 
these limits it would be further restricted by law, 
at any rate as long as any considerable inequali- 
ties of income existed; for with the development 
of social services the argument that a man 
needs to provide for his children would be pro- 
gressively undermined. Probably the bequest of 
personal possessions up to a limited amount 
would be allowed; but inheritance in excess of 
this would be likely to disappear, not so much 
because it would have been deliberately stamped 
out, though this might be the case, as because 
the need and opportunity for it would alike have 
gone. 



There has been a good deal of dispute among 
economists about the extent to which the in- 
heritance of wealth is in modern societies the 
principal cause of inequality. Its influence is 
likely to be greater in older settled countries 
than in new countries still largely at a pioneering 
stage, since the older countries have already 
much larger masses of inherited wealth and 
usually greater opportunities for investing it 
securely so as to perpetuate its existence. In- 
vested money, from which the owner simply 
draws a revenue without venturing it in risky 
undertakings, is in old settled countries largely 
self-perpetuating. There are losses of course and 
men do sink from class to class on occasion, but 
under ordinary conditions in such countries 
reasonable prudence secures the perpetuation of 
wealth once acquired. 

In older countries also there are usually fewer 
opportunities for the rapid acquisition of wealth 
by those who start life without it. There are some 
of course, and there are plenty of chances for the 
rich to become richer. But the older and the 
more settled in its economic habits a country is, 
the more likely wealth is to go to those who have 
some already and the smaller is the proportion 
of men likely to rise from nothing to great 
fortunes. 

There can then be no doubt that in the older 
settled societies inheritance is a very big factor 
indeed in causing economic inequality, although 
the whole question of the relation of inheritance 
to economic inequality demands a more thor- 
ough investigation than has as yet been made. 
It counts for a good deal not only in perpetuating 
large fortunes but also in giving those who in- 
herit even quite small fortunes a very long eco- 
nomic start over those who do not. 

In the newer countries the influence of in- 
heritance is probably less decisive, both because 
the current accumulation of new capital bears a 
higher proportion to the amount of inherited 
wealth and because, conditions being less 
settled, there are more opportunities for a man 
to rise cither by accumulating capital for himself 
out of profits or by being placed at the head of a 
big business on the score of ability alone. Such 
countries, however, as they grow in wealth 
rapidly accumulate heritable property and begin 
to develop a propertied class distinct in some 
degree from the class of successful business 
men. The United States has already a large class 
of this type, although inherited wealth still 
probably counts relatively for less in America 
than in either Great Britain or France. 



Inheritance 



39 



In nearly all countries the proportion of those 
dying who have anything substantial to leave 
is very small indeed. In England and Wales, ac- 
cording to estimates made by Professor Henry 
Clay, before the World War only 156 percent of 
all persons possessing incomes of their own had a 
total capital wealth of over jioo and only 6.8 
percent had more than 500. Even in 1920-21, 
when prices were very high, only 24.6 percent 
had 100 or over and less than 12 3 percent 
500. In Prussia, according to Dr. King, only 
14 percent had over 6000 marks in 1908. 

Inheritance in any economically significant 
form is thus confined to a comparatively small 
section of the population. Nor can there be any 
doubt that in the main those who die leave most 
of thcir money to persons of the same social 
class as themselves. There are of course many 
small legacies to poor relatives, servants and 
employees, but apart from charitable bequests 
the bulk of property tends to pass to relatives 
occupying a similar social status to those from 
whom they inherit. This causes inheritance even 
on a basis of freedom of bequest to act as a 
powerful force in perpetuating inequalities in the 
distribution of wealth and income. Gifts and be- 
quests to charities have indeed an opposite 
tendency, for they usually result in the distribu- 
tion of increased incomes or services to the 
poorer sections of the population. But in no 
country, not even in the United States, is the 
amount of gifts and bequests for education and 
charity large enough seriously to affect the dis- 
tribution of wealth in society as a whole. Com- 
prehensive figures are unavailable on this point 
but, according to Wedgewood, less than i percent 
of the estates o French persons were bequeathed 
to public and charitable institutions in 1912 and 
1913. In Great Britain the proportion is prob- 
ably somewhat higher. It is fairly certain that in 
the United States a much larger percentage of 
the wealthy man's property goes through gifts 
inter vivos or bequests to philanthropic institu- 
tions than in England or on the continent, al- 
though in the United States such bequests now 
seem to be declining. 

The inheritance of wealth lies then at the 
very roots of the class structure of modern com- 
munities. Class divisions would not necessarily 
disappear if it were abolished; for if the change 
stood alone, differences of wealth and income 
arising within the lifetime of the individual 
would still be enough to lead to wide differences 
in education and in equipment for money mak- 
ing. The rich parent could still give his children 



a preferential start in life by expensive profes- 
sional training or by setting them up in business 
for themselves. It is, however, inconceivable that 
the abolition of inheritance should stand alone. 
If it came about it would certainly be accompan- 
ied by increased public provision for higher 
education, which would undermine class mo- 
nopolies in the professions, and by a restriction of 
opportunities for the application of private 
capital to business enterprise. Inheritance is by 
no means the only source of class divisions and 
great economic inequalities, but it is difficult to 
imagine their persistence in anything like their 
present forms without it. This is the case, how- 
ever, primarily because of the other social 
changes which the abolition of inheritance con- 
notes and only secondarily because of the direct 
effects of its abolition. 

Short of abolition the rights of bequest and in- 
heritance can of course be drastically restricted 
without the immediate necessity for any com- 
plete change of economic system. Mill's pro- 
posal to limit the amount that can be inherited 
instead of the amount that can be bequeathed 
has nowhere been acted upon; but one state after 
another has introduced some form of inheritance 
taxation and thus confiscated to the public purse 
some part of the fortunes of those who die with 
any considerable property. Such taxation has 
many forms in different countries; but it usually 
involves some degree of graduation according to 
the total value of the estate and also some dis- 
crimination according as the property is left to 
nearer or remoter relatives or to strangers. Al- 
though inheritance taxes are not chiefly a method 
of influencing freedom of bequest but rather a 
method of taxing big accumulations of wealth, 
they are not nearly considerable enough to have 
noticeable effects in reducing inequalities of 
wealth or income. 

It is sometimes suggested that this failure to 
reduce inequality by taxation of inheritance is in 
itself a sign that most big fortunes are made 
rather than inherited and that inheritance is not 
so powerful a factor as has been supposed in 
causing inequality of income. But this suggestion 
ignores the great power of large fortunes to at- 
tract more money. If it were not for death duties, 
the distribution of income in Great Britain 
would be still more unequal than it actually is. 
What is left of such fortunes after taxation, 
however, is ample enough to serve as a prefer- 
ential basis for the accumulation of further 
wealth. It is not denied that in Great Britain, 
unlike the United States, economic inequality 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



40 

has been somewhat diminished of late years; but 
this is a result far more of the heavier taxes on 
incomes than of the taxation of inheritance. 

It is in effect impossible to divide the wealth 
of the richer classes into two parts, the one in- 
herited or the result of those gifts inter vivos 
which are really a form of inheritance, and the 
other acquired by the owners' personal exertions; 
for this is to ignore the truth that money breeds 
money and that it is far easier for a man who in- 
herits money both to make more and to save out 
of his income than it is for one who starts with 
nothing. Fresh capital accumulations are in part 
the result of saving out of inherited fortunes, and 
the invested capital on which large profits are 
made is in part inherited money. What a man 
makes in his own lifetime may be fully as much 
a result of his inheritance as of his personal skill, 
luck or exertion. It is therefore a sheer impossi- 
bility to isolate in any quantitative sense the 
results of inheritance, but it is fully possible to 
say that income and property would be very dif- 
ferently distributed if everyone started with an 
equal supply of capital. 

However great the social and economic influ- 
ence of inheritance is admitted to be, the institu- 
tion will not lack defenders as long as it is con- 
sidered necessary for the accumulation of capi- 
tal. It is true that the growing tendency for in- 
dustries to finance their own expansion out of 
reserved profits has led to some substitution of 
group for individual saving and has thus to some 
extent lessened the need for private accumula- 
tion out of incomes; and it may be that this 
method of group saving foreshadows a time 
when industry will be wholly self-financed or, at 
any rate, when the calls for capital out of indi- 
vidual savings will be much reduced. But for the 
present individual investment continues to play 
a large part in financing production and it is 
therefore deemed necessary to keep up the rate 
of saving. Some economists, notably J. A. Hob- 
son, have suggested that in prosperous times 
capitalist societies attempt to save and invest too 
large a proportion of their incomes, which re- 
sults in a deficiency in the demand for consum- 
ers' goods. There is much to be said for this 
view, which would provide an economic justifi- 
cation for measures tending to reduce the volume 
of saving in prosperous times, including the 
higher taxation of inheritance at such times and 
the appropriation of the proceeds as revenue and 
not as capital. It cannot be held, however, that 
this tendency to oversaving exists, in the same 
degree at any rate, when times are bad; while it 



is precisely at such times that the state, hard 
pressed for revenue, is likeliest to use capital 
taxes for meeting current expenditure. 

In any case the need for private accumulation 
of capital does still exist in a considerable degree 
in modern societies and inheritance will continue 
to find defenders on the ground that it promotes 
this end. It will indeed be defended not so much 
in spite of its tendency to aggravate inequalities 
of wealth and income as because of this tend- 
ency; for there is a school of economists that 
maintains that the richer the rich are, the richer 
will the poor be also, because the highest pro- 
duction and the highest wages will be secured 
when profits are highest and profits will tend to 
be highest where the accumulation of capital has 
been pushed to the furthest point. This view 
has of course some plausibility; admittedly in- 
equalities of wealth and income are greatest in 
the richest societies and these have also the 
highest real wages. But it does not follow that 
the high productivity on which this wealth is 
based is the product of economic inequality or 
that unrestricted inheritance is necessary to its 
maintenance. 

Admitted, however, that any severe restriction 
on the right of inheritance would, unless the 
state used the proceeds as capital, reduce the 
rate of capital accumulation; the question is how 
far severer taxation of inheritance would react 
on the individual's will to accumulate. 

That high inheritance taxation stimulatcs*gifts 
inter vivos is evident enough. That it does not 
have this effect in a far greater measure is a clear 
sign of the tenacity with which the aging tend 
to cling to their money. Most of them remain un- 
willing to surrender ownership or control to 
their children, except on a small scale, despite 
the possibility of avoiding a good deal of taxation. 
This bears out the point that in general the 
psychological incidence of taxation is upon the 
inheritor and not on the testator. 

If this is so, it seems reasonable to suppose 
that taxes on inheritance will not much affect the 
will to save. It is moreover highly relevant to 
point out that among the richest members of a 
community saving is largely automatic in that it 
represents surplus income beyond the desire to 
spend. Clearly saving of this sort will not be 
affected by taxation except to the extent to 
which gifts inter vivos and charitable donations 
may be stimulated. Graduated taxes on large in- 
comes by reducing automatic saving react far 
more decisively on the volume of accumulation 
than do death duties. 



Inheritance 



4 1 



In the case of small fortunes taxes on in- 
heritance where they exist at all are usually at a 
low rate and unlikely to affect saving, although 
they may to some extent direct it to forms of sav- 
ing that are exempt from the tax, such as life in- 
surance policies. 

If a state should, however, merely hy gradually 
increasing its taxes on inheritance seek to 
abolish inheritance altogether, it would reach a 
point, far short of actual abolition, at which the 
taxation would react sharply on the volume of 
saving. Accordingly any state pursuing such a 
policy would have to take steps in the course of it 
to bring into being alternative methods of capi- 
tal accumulation on a collective basis and would 
have to apply the product of its inheritance taxes 
as capital and not as income. 

Plans for the abolition of inheritance are nec- 
essarily anticapitalistic; for they involve either 
direct collective operation of capital resources or 
collective control and rationing of their use. 
They are not necessarily socialist but they do 
imply the supersession of capitalism as an eco- 
nomic system. It is not possible to advocate the 
abolition of inheritance on purely ethical 
grounds without being prepared to suggest al- 
ternative methods for the accumulation of capi- 
tal; and to this difficulty socialism presents the 
most obvious answer. Moreover if inheritance is 
abolished or even if taxation of it is pushed very 
far, it.becomes inevitable for the state as the tax- 
ing authority to take over actual assets, since 
beyond a certain point the proceeds of inherit- 
ance taxes could not possibly be collected in 
money. The state then would become in effect 
the heir and it would be difficult to avoid the 
conclusion that the state should administer the 
assets acquired by way of taxation. 

The economic and the ethical aspects of the 
question are thus closely intertwined. Many 
persons who are not prepared to defend inherit- 
ance directly on ethical grounds nevertheless 
uphold its economic desirability, because they 
mistrust the effects on production of an approach 
to socialism, and are ready to advocate the taxa- 
tion of inheritance up to the point at which they 
think it will interfere with the private accumu- 
lation of capital. This was in essence Bentham's 
position and it has still powerful upholders in 
the world today. 

To others the ethical arguments, which are 
directed partly against inequality in general and 
partly against inequalities resulting from in- 
heritance and not from a man's own exertions, 
constitute a strong inducement to consider 



favorably any economic system which will make 
these inequalities unnecessary. The case for 
socialism, which is based on a mingling of eco- 
nomic and ethical considerations, gains here a 
powerful reenforcement; for it can be pointed 
out that what the legatee in fact inherits is not 
a sum of money but essentially a claim on the 
productive capacity of society. This capacity, the 
result of centuries of development, is in reality a 
social product, the common heritage of civiliza- 
tion, in which it would seem that all are entitled 
to share. In other words, when a man saves 
under present conditions, the result is to secure 
to him much more than he saves because he ac- 
quires a preferential share in the social heritage. 
It seems unfair that a man should be able to pass 
on this preferential claim to his successors with- 
out limit. Most states have passed legislation to 
prevent "perpetuities" and to limit testators' 
rights to prescribe for generations ahead how 
their money is to be used or to order that it shall 
accumulate at compound interest for a long 
period. But in spite of these restrictions there is 
nothing to prevent the claim itself from being 
perpetual; this seems to many people to be mani- 
festly unjust. 

It is true that capital does not in. most cases 
survive forever in an unbroken line of succes- 
sion. Physical instruments of production, except 
land, wear out; and even where the capital they 
represent is perpetuated by the provision of ade- 
quate allowance for depreciation, there are 
hazards which do in the long run bring the 
life of most forms of business enterprise to an 
end. Even states though they cannot go bank- 
rupt do sometimes repudiate their debts and so 
confiscate the property of their bondholders; 
and apart from the wasting of the assets them- 
selves there is likely at some point m a long suc- 
cession of heirs to arise a wastrel who will dissi- 
pate his patrimony. But with the growth of trust 
companies and the corporate organization of 
business this becomes increasingly a less im- 
portant factor. It is indeed often stated that the 
life of most inherited fortunes is not long except 
in the case of landed estates; and this is probably 
true if it is meant that large fortunes are seldom 
kept together for many lives in the hands of a 
succession of sole heirs. There is a trend toward 
division of fortunes as well as to wastage; and 
this tends to become more pronounced as 
property can be more and more easily divided 
through the operation of the joint stock system. 
But property rights are not any the less perpet- 
uated because they are divided up; the division 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



4 2 

does not make strongly for greater equality, be- 
cause the property even if it is divided is usually 
left in the main to persons of the same social 
class. 

It is possible to imagine a form of socialism or, 
at any rate, collectivism that would perpetuate 
inheritance much in its present form. If the state 
carried on industry, borrowing the money from 
its citizens as it borrows now in the case of 
nationalized or municipalized undertakings, in- 
heritance could continue, the inherited property 
taking the form of perpetual state bonds or 
stocks. It is, however, difficult to imagine such a 
system being of long continuance, for it would 
clearly render the private owners of the capital 
completely functionlcss, mere receivers of inter- 
est or dividends with no claim to income based 
even on a show of service. Under such conditions 
they would certainly before long suffer ex- 
propriation, for no economic or social institu- 
tion can survive permanently if it has lost the 
function which it came into being to perform. 
Socialism of this type would end, although it had 
not begun, in the abolition of inheritance or in its 
restriction to things other than claims arising 
out of loans to the state. 

Belief or disbelief in the institution of in- 
heritance is therefore very closely linked up with 
belief or disbelief in the private ownership and 
operation of the instruments of production. The 
abolition of inheritance or its limitation to per- 
sonal possessions of use is in practise if not 
necessarily in theory a socialist doctrine. Peculiar 
interest therefore attaches to the handling of the 
problem in Soviet Russia, where almost the first 
step of the new government in 1918 was to de- 
cree the abolition of inheritance of all property 
above 10,000 rubles except for provision for 
meeting claims of relatives based on proved 
need. This attitude has since been modified and 
under a decree of 1922, the civil code (1923) and 
a decree of 1926 the limitation on the value of the 
property which can be inherited is removed; 
direct descendants, dependents and surviving 
spouses are entitled to share; and furniture and 
household effects go to the housemates of the 
deceased. Wills can be made so as to vary the 
disposal of property among the legal heirs but 
not so as to leave it to others; and in the absence 
of testamentary provision distribution among 
those entitled to benefit is equal. 

The new provisions mean far less than appears 
on the surface since they are indeed rather the 
result of the Communists' success in destroying 
private property than any token of a reversal of 



ideas or policy. The Soviet government can now 
afford to permit inheritance because it does not 
permit the accumulation of wealth in private 
hands and because, when accumulation does ex- 
ceptionally still occur, it has plenty of other 
methods besides the prevention of inheritance 
of breaking it up. The private trader or the 
kulak (rich peasant) who succeeds in amassing 
property has no security at all of being able to 
retain it for his own lifetime; and the question 
of his right to pass it on to his descendants there- 
fore loses most of its importance. The one form 
of private property which has hitherto remained 
in being is now on the road to destruction by the 
placing of agriculture on a collective basis; and 
when that has been completed, the citizens of 
the Soviet Union will have only personal po&es- 
sions to leave, except for the continuance for the 
time being of a small quantity of state bonds. 
For the Soviet Union does still to a small extent 
supplement the collective supply of capital by 
borrowing from its citizens. 

This shows that, when a transition from capi- 
talism to socialism is made abruptly and is ac- 
companied by a general confiscation of existing 
wealth, the question of inheritance ceases at once 
to possess much economic importance; for both 
the existing capital and the power of fresh pri- 
vate accumulation are taken away at a blow. 
Moreover while private accumulation may sur- 
vive for a tune it is more likely to be attacked by 
the direct confiscation of property from living 
owners than by the removal of the right of be- 
quest or inheritance. 

Inheritance as a contemporary problem is 
therefore essentially a problem of capitalist so- 
ciety; and it cannot be abolished or restricted 
within narrow limits so as still to leave capitalist 
society intact. If private persons are not to in- 
herit, the state must; and state inheritance means 
state control of the use of capital. Propaganda for 
the abolition of inheritance is in most cases in 
effect propaganda for socialism; and the question 
of inheritance, as distinct fiom taxation of it 
within limits that will not destroy its essential 
character, thus merges in the wider question of a 
socialist versus a capitalist framework of society. 
This is why there has never been any important 
social or economic movement making the aboli- 
tion of inheritance its main objective. 

If it is impossible to abolish inheritance with- 
out altering profoundly the economic structure 
of society, it is no less out of the question to re- 
tain inheritance in anything like its present form 
if that structure is radically altered in a socialist 



Inheritance Inheritance Taxation 



43 



sense. For inheritance is bound up with the di- 
vision of society into distinct social and eco- 
nomic classes and influences this division the 
more profoundly because in advanced communi- 
ties the better o classes tend to have lower 
birth rates than the poorer sections of the people 
and therefore to keep their wealth within a nar- 
row range. The institution of inheritance helps 
indeed to foster this control of numbers among 
the well to do, since they are conscious of the 
need for limitation as a means of preserving 
their class status. Even where primogeniture re- 
mains the custom this limiting influence holds 
good; for the disinherited younger children are 
likely to be provided for during the testator's life 
by expenditure on education and training, by 
enabling them to start in business or by marrying 
daughters off with at least some "portion" of 
their own. It is true that the growth of feminism 
has tended to cause further diffusion of property, 
for daughters are now more often than before 
treated on an equality with sons. But this may 
even accentuate the tendency toward family 
limitation among the middle class. 

The future of inheritance then appears to de- 
pend, on the one hand, on the growth in modern 
communities of collective methods of capital ac- 
cumulation and of the control of business re- 
sources and, on the other, on the pressure of the 
popular movement toward a less unequal distri- 
butiqn of incomes; for this movement, ethical as 
well as economic in its driving force, results in 
forms of taxation which limit saving and impinge 
on profits and thus leads to the necessity of al- 
ternative methods of saving and of insuring ade- 
quate production. The two influences thus meet 
and mingle; and it is not easy to see how the in- 
stitution of inheritance, save in a greatly modi- 
fied form, can indefinitely stand out against 
them, despite the fact that it is for the moment 
strong. 

To the extent to which it is restricted there is 
a return from the individualistic notion of prop- 
erty to a communal notion, based now on a unit 
wider not only than the family but also than the 
clan or tribe, since property comes to be re- 
garded as part of the social heritage of the mod- 
ern community, legitimately charged with the 
maintenance of all its members. This notion 
may further undermine, as it has already under- 
mined in Soviet Russia, what remains in indus- 
trial societies of the conception of family solidar- 
ity. It will inevitably affect the institution of 
marriage and the relations between parents and 
children. But even in capitalist society the family 



has largely lost its economic significance and 
become, save in respect of inheritance, mainly a 
social unit whose bonds have grown far looser 
even within living memory. If inheritance goes, 
the last economic bond will be snapped, at any 
rate beyond the period of the children's upbring- 
ing; and that too is likely to become increasingly 
a social function. 

G. D. H. COLE 

See: PROPERTY; WEALTH; FORTUNLS, PRIVATE; ACCU- 
MULATION; PLUTOCRACY, CLASS, EQUALITY; INHERIT- 
ANCE TAXATION; SOCIALISM, SUCCESSION, LAWS OF 
PRIMOGENIIURE, MARITAL PROPER1Y. 

Consult: Beaglehole, E , Property (London 1931) 
p. 215-16, and table IV, p. 244-47, Lowie, Robert 
II, Primitive Society (New York 1920) p 243-55; 
Wedgewoocl, Josiah, The Economics* of Inheritance 
(London 1929), Dilton, Hugh, Some Aspects of the 
Inequality of Incomes in Modern Communities (Lon- 
don 1920) p. 281-343; Stamp, Josiah C , Some P'co- 
nonnc Factors in Modern Life (London 1929) ch. n; 
Clay, H , Property and Inheritance (London 1923); 
Gabain, K. E von, Das Erbrecht in Souyetrussland 
(Berne 1929), Ta^er, Paul, "Lc regime successoral 
dans le droit sovieiique envisag^ dans son (Solution 
histonque" in Societ<5 de Legislation Comparee, 
Bulletin, vol. Iv (1926) 531-58. 

INHERITANCE TAXATION. The inheri- 
tance tax is a levy made on the occasion of the 
transfer of property at or in connection with the 
death of the owner. It may take the form of a tax 
on the estate as a whole, on the respective shares 
of the beneficiaries or on both. The tax is vari- 
ously held to be a direct tax upon property (of 
testator or recipient) or an indirect tax upon the 
act of the transfer or receipt of property at the 
death of the owner. In modern times the in- 
heritance tax has been incorporated into the tax 
system of every important country. 

Transfers of property at the death of the 
owner were subject to the property transfer taxes 
of ancient Egypt and Greece. The element of 
death, however, was purely incidental in these 
taxes. The first true inheritance tax was the 
Roman mcesima hcreditatium instituted in 6 
A.D., a 5 percent tax on collateral inheritance and 
bequest. With various modifications this tax per- 
sisted for several centuries. 

During the Middle Ages there were certain 
feudal dues the relief, the Erbkauf and the 
heriot which resembled inheritance taxes; in 
several countries the royal relief evolved into a 
rudimentary national inheritance tax. By the end 
of the fourteenth century several forms of death 
tax had been established in the Italian and Ger- 
man commercial cities. The seventeenth century 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



44 

saw the enactment of inheritance taxes in the 
Dutch provinces and in a number of German 
principalities. By the end of the seventeenth 
century there were inheritance taxes in the four 
national states, England, France, Spain and 
Portugal. 

The substantial development of the European 
inheritance tax occurred during the nineteenth 
century. From a disorganized set of minor 
probate duties the English tax expanded into a 
full fledged estate duty; it was extended from 
personalty to real property; its rate schedule, at 
first regressive, became proportional and then 
progressive. The present English estate duty is 
supplemented by the legacy duty on movable 
property and the succession duty on immovable 
property; both taxes, levied on the shares re- 
ceived by the individual beneficiaries, are 
graduated according to the degree of the bene- 
ficiary's relationship to the deceased. The 
French inheritance tax, established in 1796, had 
rates graduated according to the relationship of 
the beneficiary or heir to the deceased and dis- 
criminated between realty and personalty; dur- 
ing the nineteenth century the discrimination 
according to the character of the property was 
eliminated and the relationship graduation was 
augmented; in 1901 the rates of the tax were 
made progressive. Italy in 1862 adopted an in- 
heritance tax modeled on the French law; its 
rates were made progressive in 1902. The Prus- 
sian collateral inheritance tax of 1873 was fol- 
lowed by similar taxes in the other German 
states; growing agitation for an imperial inheri- 
tance tax resulted in 1906 in a national inheri- 
tance tax with relationship discrimination and 
progressive rates. 

The general character of European inheritance 
taxes has undergone no radical change during 
the past twenty-five years. During the World 
War and the post-war years because of the pres- 
sure of increasing fiscal burdens and the growing 
political power of propertyless groups rates in- 
creased and progression wassharpened; since 1921 
in France combined maximum rates of estate 
and inheritance taxes would call for a rate of 98 
percent, were not the maximum limited by law 
to 80 percent. Various discriminations have been 
experimented with to bring these heavy taxes 
more in line with various concepts of fiscal jus- 
tice. During recent years inheritance taxes have 
yielded over 10 percent of the national tax rev- 
enue in England, over 5 percent in France and 
less than i percent in Germany. 

A dozen American states attempted the levy of 



inheritance taxes during the first three quarters 
of the nineteenth century, but their statutes were 
badly drawn and poorly administered and most 
of these early state taxes were repealed within a 
few years of their levy. Effective use of the in- 
heritance tax did not occur in the United States 
until the New York inheritance tax law of 1885, 
carefully drawn and well administered, proved a 
success. Other states were encouraged to experi- 
ment with this form of taxation, and by 1902 
twenty-six states levied inheritance taxes of one 
sort or another. The taxes of this period were all 
proportional, usually embodied relationship 
graduation and were generally limited to col- 
lateral inheritance and bequest. In 1892 New 
York led the way to extending the tax to direct 
heirs. Wisconsin in 1903 enacted a progressive 
inheritance tax which soon became the model for 
other states. 

In the years 1797 to 1802 the federal govern- 
ment collected a stamp tax on successions by in- 
heritance to personal property. A federal in- 
heritance tax was also levied during the Civil 
War decade. The inheritance tax embodied in 
the federal income tax act of 1894 was aban- 
doned when that income tax was declared un- 
constitutional. Four years later a short lived pro- 
gressive tax was levied as part of the Spanish 
War tax program. Not until 1916 did the federal 
government make an inheritance tax a perma- 
nent part of its tax system. The tax levied in 
this year was an estate duty applying to estates 
in excess of $50,000 with a progressive rate 
schedule rising to a maximum of 10 percent on 
the excess of an estate over $5,000,000. Subse- 
quent revenue acts increased the rates of this 
tax until in 1924 the rate on the excess of an 
estate over $10,000,000 was 40 percent. The 
maximum rate was reduced to 20 percent in 1926, 
but was raised to 45 in the revenue act of 1932. 

A feature of the 1924 federal estate duty was 
the allowance of a credit to taxed estates to cover 
state inheritance taxes charged against them; the 
maximum credit allowance was 25 percent. 
When the rates of the federal tax were lowered 
in 1926, this credit was increased so that it 
ranged from 15 to 75 percent; this credit sched- 
ule was maintained in 1932 when the estate duty 
was raised. The effect of this credit was to 
eliminate the burden of state taxes on estates 
where the rates of the state taxes did not exceed 
the credit allowed under the federal tax. State 
inheritance taxes were thus deprived of their 
effect of driving rich individuals to adopt resi- 
dences in states levying no or low inheritance 



Inheritance Taxation 



45 



taxes. The consequence of this federal estate tax 
credit was an increase in the number of states 
levying death taxes; in 1932 only Nevada was 
without an inheritance tax. The rates of the state 
taxes were generally increased so as to take full 
advantage of the credit; in the process many 
states changed the form of their taxes from in- 
heritance taxes levied on the shares received by 
the beneficiaries to estate taxes levied on the full 
estate left by the decedent, so as to obtain an 
exact adjustment of the rates of their inheritance 
taxes to the credit allowed under the federal 
estate duty. 

Because of the large initial exemption of 
$100,000 and the generous credit allowance to 
cover state inheritance taxes the federal govern- 
ment received little revenue from its estate 
duty in 1926-32. For fiscal year 1929-30 its re- 
ceipts from this source were $64,842,725, less 
than 2 percent of its total tax revenue. State 
governments during their 1929 fiscal years de- 
rived $148,591 ,827, about 9 percent of their total 
tax revenue, from their inheritance taxes. 

There has been much dispute both in Europe 
and in America as to the legal character of the 
inheritance tax. One school of nineteenth cen- 
tury thought, stemming from Bentham, held 
that the inheritance tax can be viewed as an 
exercise of the state's inherent right to regulate 
inheritance and bequest. Another, developed by 
Munzinger and championed by Bluntschli, 
Wagner and Ely, held that the state as feudal 
overlord of the individual was coheir in every 
estate and took its share in the form of an in- 
heritance tax. These two theories never gained 
wide acceptance, and the inheritance tax is now 
universally viewed simply as a tax levied under 
the state's taxing power. 

, Distributive justification of the inheritance 
tax has been based on many theories of tax 
justice. Moderate transfer fees have been de- 
fended as a recompense to the state for its super- 
vision of the ownership of the property of a de- 
ceased person. Heavier inheritance taxes have 
been justified as a recompense for the protection 
accorded to property during the lifetime of its 
owner. The quid pro quo doctrines of tax jus- 
tice, however, afford little encouragement for in- 
heritance taxation, and appeal to them is gen- 
erally made by the opponents rather than the 
supporters of inheritance taxation. The ability 
and sacrifice doctrines have been heavily drawn 
upon in defense of inheritance taxation, par- 
ticularly of progressive inheritance taxes. The 
deceased, it is argued, has no further use for his 



property, while to the heirs and beneficiaries it 
is an unearned windfall whose reduction by a tax 
involves no sacrifice whatsoever. Several writers, 
like Graziani and Adams, have chosen to view in- 
heritances or bequests as simple increments of 
income received by the beneficiary and so sub- 
ject to all the ability and sacrifice doctrines ap- 
plying to income. Schgman justifies the inheri- 
tance tax both as a tax on accidental income and 
as a payment for the privilege of inheritance con- 
ferred by the state. 

Several unusual distributive justifications for 
inheritance taxes are to be noted. A scattered 
group of writers have defended this tax on the 
ground that it constitutes a lump sum payment 
of taxes evaded by the deceased and his estate 
during the lifetime of the deceased or a lump 
sum payment of periodic taxes, such as the in- 
come tax, not conveniently levied in their true 
form. Certain American writers have viewed the 
state as a silent partner in the accumulation of 
individual fortunes and have described the in- 
heritance tax as a method employed by the state 
to realize on its partnership share. Individual 
radical writers have urged inheritance taxes as a 
method of breaking down large family fortunes 
and so reducing inequality in the distribution of 
wealth, although the socialist school of writers 
have generally ignored the inheritance tax, view- 
ing it as merely an undesirable palliative of the 
evils they are attacking. 

The levy of inheritance taxes has raised many 
practical issues which have not yet achieved final 
solution. There still exists open disagreement as 
to the respective advantages of the inheritance 
tax levied on the shares of an estate received by 
individual beneficiaries and heirs and of the 
estate tax levied on the entire estate left by the 
deceased. The latter is the form of the English 
estate duty and of the American federal estate 
tax, while the former is employed on the conti- 
nent and was until recently the characteristic 
form of American state inheritance taxes. The 
great advantage of the estate tax is the simplicity 
of its determination: only one calculation is in- 
volved for each estate and there are no complica- 
tions caused by life estates, remainders and con- 
tingencies. Furthermore a progressive estate 
duty with a given schedule of rates has a higher 
yield than an inheritance tax with the same 
schedule of rates; the fractions of an estate re- 
ceived by the individual beneficiaries and heirs 
rarely involve the application of the same high 
bracket rates to which the undivided estate 
would be subject. The disadvantage of the estate 



46 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



tax is its maladaptation to the ability and sacri- 
fice doctrines of tax justice. Only by strained 
reasoning can the ability and sacrifice theories 
be made to support the use of progressive rate 
schedules in an estate tax. Furthermore an estate 
tax is not adapted to relationship graduation; 
where such graduation is effected in an estate tax, 
as in the Canadian provincial death duties, it is 
at the cost of simplicity and facility of adminis- 
tration. 

Relationship discrimination is itself an open 
issue in inheritance taxation. Its strongest theo- 
retical foundation is the family sense, the feeling 
that the direct heirs of a deceased person have a 
greater claim on his property than collateral or 
unrelated beneficiaries, that the former are but 
realizing a latent property right in the estate 
while to the latter their shares are pure wind- 
falls. Some writers, like Schccl and Puviani, have 
attempted to make out a case for relationship 
graduation on the basis of the sacrifice doctrine 
of taxation; they argue that the value of the 
property coming to direct heirs is lessened by 
their grief over the death of the decedent, that 
this diminution of the value of an inheritance 
decreases with the distance of the relationship 
between beneficiary and deceased and that the 
relationship graduation of an inheritance tax off- 
sets this "grief sacrifice." In the Latin countries, 
where the sense of family remains strong, rela- 
tionship graduation in death taxation is carried 
out to minute detail. In the English speaking 
countries, on the contrary, the trend seems 
strongly against such graduation, except for 
generous rate and exemption allowances to the 
widow and children of the deceased, who in 
gaining an inheritance have lost their bread- 
winner. 

Progressive inheritance taxes, as previously in- 
dicated, do not derive much support from the 
ability doctrines of taxation. If the tax be viewed 
as one on the property owned by the decedent, 
it is difficult to see wherein the ability doctrines 
can apply to a dead man. If the tax is considered 
a levy on the recipients of the estate, their tax- 
paying ability is determined not only by the 
shares of the estate received by them but also by 
the property owned by them; surely a rich man 
receiving a small inheritance has a greater tax- 
paying ability than a poor man receiving a large 
inheritance. These considerations prompted 
several German writers to advocate the gradua- 
tion of the tax rates on the basis of prior wealth 
of the heir plus his inheritance. The German 
and Italian inheritance taxes of 1919 made pro- 



vision for supplementary graduation of the tax 
rates according to the prior wealth of the heir. 
Effective determination of such prior wealth 
proved administratively impracticable, however, 
and in both Germany and Italy this provision 
was abolished in 1923. 

Beginning with Adam Smith fiscal economists 
have pointed out an important discrimination in 
the inheritance tax; namely, that it bears un- 
equally upon the property of families according 
to whether deaths in the family follow each other 
at short intervals or are widely spaced. With the 
heavy rates now in effect in some countries a 
rapid succession of deaths in a family could 
easily wipe out a large family property. Various 
proposals that the tax on an estate be propor- 
tioned to the number of years it had been en- 
joyed by the deceased have never been embodied 
in legislation. Instead, beginning with the 
Chilean inheritance tax of 1878, many taxes 
have included a provision for a rebate of the tax 
on any part of an estate which has paid an in- 
heritance tax within a period of preceding years, 
usually five. Such a provision is found in the 
American federal estate tax and in the inherit- 
ance taxes of fifteen states. 

Several of the European inheritance taxes in- 
volve a rate discrimination intended to favor 
decedents or beneficiaries with large families. In 
France the inheritance tax of 1917 allowed a 
beneficiary a lo-percent reduction in his t?x for 
each child above the number of three. At the 
same time a progressive estate duty called the 
taxe successorale was levied on the estates of de- 
cedents who died leaving fewer than four chil- 
dren; besides progression based on the size of the 
estate the rate schedule of this tax was graduated 
in accordance with the number of the children 
left by the deceased; the rates on the estate of a 
deceased leaving three children ranged from 
\ percent to 3 percent, while those on the estate 
of a childless decedent ranged from 2 percent to 
24 percent. The Belgian tax of 1919 provided for 
a 2-percent reduction of the tax on a beneficiary 
for each of his children. It is doubtful whether 
such fiscal discriminations can have any effect on 
the birth rate of a country. Rather they provide 
an excuse for the levy of tax rates higher than 
might otherwise be acceptable to the popular 
temper of the times. The favoring of a beneficiary 
or heir with a large family finds ample justifica- 
tion under the ability doctrines of taxation, since 
it can logically be argued that the expense of 
maintaining his large family definitely reduces 
his taxpaying ability; the levy of special rates on 



Inheritance Taxation 



47 



the estates of decedents with few or no children, 
as under the taxe successorale, does not enjoy 
such support in ethical theory. 

Soldiers and sailors who die while in the na- 
tional service are sometimes favored under in- 
heritance taxes. The English death duties have 
accorded full or partial exemption to such de- 
cedents since 1694. Exemption to the estates of 
officers and men who fell in the World War was 
introduced into the French and American death 
taxes. 

Certain minor discriminations found in earlier 
inheritance taxes are no longer common. The 
seventeenth century inheritance taxes of the 
Dutch provinces and some of the inheritance 
tax$s of the Canadian provinces and of the 
American states levied discriminatory rates on 
bequests to or inheritance by alien heirs. The 
only defense for such discriminations is a rather 
narrow nationalism, and in most cases they have 
been rendered inoperative by international 
treaties of fiscal reciprocity. Another outworn 
mode of discrimination is the levy of special high 
rates on the transfer of property by intestate 
succession. Such discrimination was found in 
the early death duties of England, Sweden, 
Uruguay and Brazil. It probably represented a 
belated aftermath of the mediaeval ecclesiastical 
prejudice against intestacy and it no longer has a 
place in inheritance tax legislation. A third 
spedal discrimination peculiar to the inheritance 
taxes of the American states was the levy of penal 
rates on such part of an estate as had evaded other 
state taxes during the lifetime of the deceased. 
Such a provision appeared in the Wisconsin tax 
of 1899, the Louisiana tax of 1904, the New York 
tax of 1917 and the Connecticut tax of 1918. In 
every case the penal tax proved administratively 
impracticable and was soon dropped. 

A unique proposal by the Italian economist 
Rignano has recently received much favorable 
attention. His suggestion was to levy a supple- 
mentary estate tax on such part of an estate as 
had been received by the deceased as gift, in- 
heritance or bequest during his lifetime, that is, 
on the property which had not been accumulated 
by him through his own efforts. Rignano 's 
underlying idea was frankly socio-ethical rather 
than fiscal. His proposed tax would result in 
breaking down large fortunes by striking at their 
root the transfer intact from generation to 
generation of large family properties; levied with 
the high rates advocated by Rignano, such a tax 
would provide a "painless transition to social- 
ism." In the more moderate form suggested by 



its American and English proponents it would 
be less of a weapon of social revolution and more 
of a fiscal expedient. To date no inheritance tax 
law has embodied the proposal. 

The history of death tax legislation shows a 
steady broadening of the scope of the statutes to 
block possibilities of evading the tax. Fictitious 
debts created in favor of beneficiaries, joint 
estates passing by survivorship, testamentary 
trusts, provision for excessive remuneration to 
executor beneficiaries, deathbed donations and 
gifts made prior to and in anticipation of death 
have all been brought within the scope of death 
tax statutes. Only the last named class of trans- 
fers still presents a problem to the death tax 
administrator. The federal and state inheritance 
tax laws in the United States have sought to cir- 
cumvent this form of evasion by providing that 
gifts made "in contemplation of death" shall be 
taxed as part of the estate transferred at death. 
At first the statutes set specific periods, ranging 
from six months to six years prior to death, 
within which time gifts made by a property 
owner would be deemed attempts to avoid the in- 
heritance tax and should therefore be taxable as 
part of the estate. The American courts have 
shattered this arbitrary attack, and at present the 
most that tax administrators can claim with re- 
gard to such gifts is the presumption that they 
were made in anticipation of death. A more di- 
rect approach to this problem is the levy of a 
gift tax as a supplement to an inheritance tax. 
All gifts except deathbed donations are subject 
to such a gift tax irrespective of whether they 
are made to avoid the inheritance tax or are 
innocent of ulterior motive. Gift taxes of this 
nature are common in Europe. The American 
federal government levied such a tax in 1924, 
abolished it two years later and enacted another 
gift tax in 1932, with a rate schedule ranging 
from | percent to 33^ percent. 

Outright evasion of an inheritance tax is diffi- 
cult if the tax is administered with reasonable 
effectiveness. Administration of the early Ameri- 
can state inheritance taxes was usually left to the 
probate courts, charged with supervision of the 
administration of estates. The indifference of the 
officers of these courts to the fiscal duties arbi- 
trarily imposed upon them led to the failure of 
these early state inheritance taxes. When admin- 
istration of the tax was transferred to central 
state agencies, evasion of the tax was readily 
checked. Administration of inheritance taxes in 
the United States and England is facilitated by 
the circumstance that the executor or adminis- 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



trator of an estate who is charged with payment 
of the tax is an officer of the probate court which 
appoints him and is accountable to the court for 
his actions. The opportunities for successful 
evasion of the tax are so slight and the penalties 
which would be incurred by such abuse of the 
executor's or administrator's official obligations 
are so heavy that there is little incentive to tax 
evasion. In the continental countries, where 
control over the administration of estates is not 
so effective, the fiscal authorities rely to a greater 
extent on minute and inquisitorial examination 
into the lifetime transactions of the deceased. 

It is generally accepted that the inheritance 
tax is not shifted. It reduces the shares of 
estates received by beneficiaries and heirs, and it 
is beyond their power to pass their tax burden to 
other economic classes. 

It is frequently argued that an inheritance tax 
is injurious to economic development because it 
destroys capital, diverts it from productive uses 
and discourages the incentive for saving, thus 
acting as a deterrent to accumulation of capital. 

The first argument, sponsored by Ricardo, is 
based on the assumption that a tax "measured" 
by capital is necessarily paid out of capital 
property. This, however, is not the case. Fixed 
capital remains unimpaired regardless of the tax 
on it at the death of the owner. It is true that the 
payment of a high inheritance tax which is in the 
nature of a sudden liability may result in forced 
liquidation and consequent depreciation of as- 
sets. But the loss here is purely individual. What 
is lost by the seller is gained by the buyer. From 
the social aspect the economic significance of the 
property remains unimpaired. Furthermore the 
various provisions for the distribution of the tax 
over a number of years, in England as many as 
eight, and the growing practise of providing for 
the payment of the tax through insurance obviate 
the necessity for forced and hasty liquidation. 

With regard to the effect of inheritance on the 
volume of liquid capital available for investment 
it must first be determined whether the high tax 
rates on inheritance are offset by reductions in 
other taxes and if so whether the reductions 
apply to that portion of wealth which is likely to 
be saved, that is, turned into capital, or to the 
part of wealth which is likely to be diverted to 
the purchase of consumers' goods. In the former 
case the loss in the volume of saving occasioned 
by the payment of the inheritance tax will be off- 
set by the greater saving capacity of other tax- 
payers. In the latter case, which is more frequent 
in democratic countries, where the reductions 



will apply to taxes of wide incidence, the amounts 
so remitted will be applied to current consump- 
tion and the payment of the inheritance tax will 
undoubtedly constitute a net reduction in the 
volume of capital available for private invest- 
ment. The final judgment in this instance hinges 
on the broader problem of the relative merits of 
public expenditure and private investment; 
moreover in view of the increasing participation 
of governments in productive enterprises the 
distinction loses in importance. 

The argument concerning the adverse effect 
of high inheritance taxes on saving and accumu- 
lation is theoretical and devoid of any factual 
verification. A priori it can be argued with equal 
plausibility that the existence of high tax rates 
will stimulate the affectionate parent to greater 
accumulation in order to offset the loss which 
his estate will sustain from the tax. 

At present the inheritance tax may be con- 
sidered to have completed the experimental form- 
ative stage of its evolution. By scholars and 
legislators alike it is accepted as a valid source of 
an appreciable quota of tax revenue. Attempts at 
intricate graduation and discrimination to effect 
non-fiscal designs have been for the most part 
abandoned, and the trend of recent years would 
seem to be toward ever greater simplicity and 
uniformity. The major inheritance tax problem 
facing legislators today is that of overlapping tax 
jurisdictions and double taxation as between 
states and between nations; interstate and in- 
ternational reciprocity agreements together 
with court decisions in federal countries like 
the United States have gone far toward eliminat- 
ing the worst features of this abuse. 

WILLIAM J. SHULTZ 

See: TAXATION; PUBLIC FINANCE; INHERITANCE; SUC- 
CESSION, LAWS OF; FORTUNES, PRIVAIE; ACCUMULA- 
TION; DOUBLE TAXATION; AUBAINE, DROIT DE. 

Consult. Shultz, W. J., The Taxation of Inheritance 
(Boston 1926), and American Public Finance and 
Taxation (New York 1931) ch. xxxi; Soward, Alfred 
W., and William, W. E., The Taxation of Capital 
(London 1919); Buchner, R., "Erbschafts- und 
Schenkungssteuern" in Handbuch der Finanzwissen- 
schaft, ed. by W. Gerloff and F. Meisel, vols. i-iii 
(Tubingen 1926-29) vol. ii, p. 310-23; Schanz, G., 
"Erbschaftsstcucr" in Handworterbuch der Staats- 
unssensdiaften, 8 vols. (4th ed. Jena 1923-28) vol. lii, 
p. 794836, containing a complete bibliography of all 
works on death taxation through 1925; Seligman, E. 
R. A., "The Inheritance Tax" in Essays in Taxation 
(loth ed. New York 1925) ch. v; Schanz, G., "Studien 
zur Geschichte und Theorie der Erbschaftssteuer" in 
Finanz-Archw, Zeitschnft fur das gesamte Finanz- 
tvesen, vol. xvii (1900) 1-62, and vol. xviii (1901) 553- 
695; Johnson, Alvin S., "Public Capitalization of the 



Inheritance Taxation Initiation 



49 



Inheritance Tax" in Journal of Political Economy, vol. 
xxu (1914) 160-80; Rignano, E., Per una riforma 
socialtsta del dintto successono (Bologna 1920), tr. by 
W. J. Shultz as The Social Significance of the Inherit- 
ance Tax (New York 1924); National Conference on 
Inheritance and Estate Taxation, Proceedings, nos i-ii 
(New York 1925); Schmeber, Herbert, Die Bcsteue- 
rung der Erbschaften in den Einzelstaaten der nord- 
amerikanischen Union, Finanzwissenschafthche und 
volkswirtschafthche Studien, vol. ix (Jena 1927); 
Guggenheim, Paul, L'imposition des successions en 
droit international et le probleme de la double imposition 
(Geneva 1928). See also bibliography following IN- 
HERITANCE. 

INITIATION. A systematic ceremonial induc- 
tion of adolescent youths into the full participa- 
tion,in social life is a practically universal trait of 
the peoples of simpler culture. Such practises 
represent efforts to rivet the youth securely to 
the regnant social order and are devices for the 
development of social cohesion. The initiation 
rites are prosecuted with special vigor when the 
exclusive, personal interests of the group or class 
are threatened by exigencies, such as initial con- 
tact with alien peoples, migration, depopulation, 
threat of complete extinction or absorption into 
outside cultures, or the Heimweh provoked by a 
novel environment. The ciders under these 
stresses try to maintain group consciousness and 
custom largely through the extensive emotional 
and mental schooling of the manhood ceremo- 
nies 'because only in this way can the social herit- 
age be perpetuated as a living thing. Thus in 
Nyasaland the rite is at present being performed 
at an earlier age than formerly so that the youths 
can receive tribal instruction before they come 
under mission influence. 

At puberty physical and emotional changes in 
the child become evident, and with this sexual 
maturity comes a critical juncture in the social 
position of the individual in view of the potential 
disturbances which may be effected in the social 
order. The threat to the perpetuation of things 
as they are produces the need for endowing the 
youth with knowledge of his mores and with 
sympathy for them and with an understanding of 
the responsibilities and rights accompanying 
sexual maturity. The initiation signifies not 
simply physical but full social adulthood, and the 
two do not necessarily converge. Considerations 
of a purely cultural nature may determine the 
age of initiation, as, for example, in the New 
Hebrides and Australia, where the requirement 
of an entrance fee results in old men being 
initiated along with youths. 

The prestige associated with passage through 



the manhood ceremonies is such that the person 
uninitiated is invested with complete social 
obloquy. A child is also in an ignominious posi- 
tion until this event. Although socialization is 
fundamentally a gradual, cumulative affair, the 
accession to social maturity in primitive society 
is conceived as climactic and abrupt. The past of 
the individual is considered to be cut off and 
during the course of initiation an exceptional, 
marginal environment is staged in which he is 
outside the normal life. In this period, called rite 
de passage (to use van Gennep's term), the ordi- 
nary cement of society crumbles license, theft, 
arson, violence are often allowed. Promiscuous 
sexual intercourse is allowed the novices among 
the Papuans; even the conversation of the Kaffir 
boys may be of a dubious nature to show that 
shame no longer exists; moreover they are al- 
lowed to rob gardens and kill cattle with impu- 
nity. Among the Nandi of East Africa the novices 
are given purges and have their heads shaved; 
among the Indians of Virginia it was the custom 
to give them emetics "whereby remembrance of 
the past is obliterated." Among the Xosa of 
South Africa clothes, which are a social asset, 
are discarded and ordinary speech inverted. 
These measures heighten the sense of a break 
from the past, which is often reenforced by tak- 
ing the neophytes by simulated violence from 
the company of the women. A strict regime of 
secrecy surrounds the rites, and as the candidate 
emerges it is believed that a rebirth has occurred. 
In the sociological sense this designation is justi- 
fied, since with new costume (including such 
tribal mutilations as circumcision) and a new 
name the objective evidences of the new person- 
ality indicate a complete severance with the fu- 
tility of childhood. 

Most abiding in the metamorphosis wrought 
on the initiate is the strenuous inculcation of the 
pattern of sentiments and behavior which, it is 
thought, best promotes tribal solidarity and 
prosperity. The initiation thus serves as the chief 
vehicle to link generations in the transmission of 
the culture complex. The individual is now an 
active contributor to the food supply, a family 
head and a cult participant; he is in intimate as- 
sociation with the ancestral glories of his tribe 
a complete and full fledged tribesfellow. Of these 
various duties food getting is the prime concern. 
The series of abstentions, fasts and privations 
ceremonially undergone, as, for example, in the 
Adaman Islands, is intended to develop the real- 
ization that not only the power to obtain food 
but also the right to use it without danger is 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



something that one owes to society and that its 
bestowal involves acceptance of the correspond- 
ing obligation to share the catch or yield with 
one's fellows. Other customary outward marks of 
affiliation, such as dress, are assumed for the first 
time; and the right to other pleasurable activi- 
ties, such as smoking and drinking, are conferred. 
Usually the primitive educational system is cli- 
maxed in the didactic tactics of the initiation: 
law, morality, tradition, hygiene and cult hocus 
pocus in a varying degree of agglomeration com- 
pose the curriculum offered in the initiation bush 
or hut. 

Through all initiation exercises there is set up 
an atmosphere of continuous excitement, novel- 
ty and tumult that is intended to enlist the fer- 
vent interest of the youth. Put on edge through 
ingenious torments, sleeplessness and nerve 
racking frights, the candidate becomes keenly 
sensitive to the power of his preceptors and 
indelible, life long impressions are made. The 
technique is illustrated among the Bechuanas, 
where the boys in a state of nudity engage in a 
dance during which the men of the village pum- 
mel them with long, supple wands while asking 
them questions such as "Will you guard the 
chief well?" "Will you herd the cattle well?" In 
this way is enforced the sentiment that success 
rests in conformity and power in the hands of 
the elders. Those who wince or demur or who 
cannot pay the necessary fee are killed or de- 
classed for life. 

Initiation rites in the more complex, historical 
cultures are generally assumed to be functions of 
specific institutions or subgroups rather than of 
the folk as a unit, largely since the employment 
of written language makes possible the use of 
more consecutive pedagogical devices of less 
spectacular nature. To custodians of the cult 
and to professionalized religious groups par- 
ticularly pass the functions designed as means 
for the transmission of the general power of 
social bonds a mystification or abstraction of 
the cohesion required to maintain the existing 
social order. Active participation in the organ- 
ized religions requires passage through the cere- 
mony of Communion or confirmation in Chris- 
tian churches and that of the bar-mitzvah in tra- 
ditional Judaism, ceremonies which have ab- 
sorbed much of the solemnity and ritual of pagan 
rites. With the greater economic potency of pri- 
vate property, chattels, slavery and the like there 
arise the invidious interests of the aged, the men 
and the professional groups, which can be en- 
forced or shared only through the medium of 



surrounding entrance rites with an aura of se- 
crecy. Thus investiture with the trade and pro- 
fessional secrets in the guilds of the Middle Ages 
took on the proportions of esoteric ceremony 
akin to the magical regeneration crisis occurring 
when the neophytes were admitted into the 
Greek mystery cults. Many religious and trade 
groups adopted the esoteric tradition of puberty 
as a protection against penetration or for survival, 
since the sacralia are revealed only on this occa- 
sion to the initiated. In recent and contemporary 
society initiation and entrance ceremonies often 
acquire the air of incongruity or buffoonery as 
anachronisms in their use by fraternal societies, 
clubs, universities, subversive political move- 
ments and the like. Yet the common thread es- 
sentially characteristic of all types of initiation 
lies in the integrative and subordinating tend- 
ency of a social group to draw its members into 
a workable unity a unity continually threat- 
ened by youth or alien. 

NATHAN MILLER 

See: SOCIAL ORGANIZATION; ADOLESCENCE; EDUCA- 
TION, PRIMITIVE; CEREMONY, RITUAL; FASIING; 
DANCE, TABU, SECRET SOCILIILS. 

Consult. Miller, Nathan, The Cluld in Primitive Sod- 
ety (London 1928) ch. x; Goblet d'Alviella, E. F. A., 
"L'initiation, institution sociale, masque et religi- 
euse"m Revuede Vhi^toitedcs re!tt>ion<: t vol. lxxxi( 1920) 
125; Webster, Hutton, Primitive Secret Societies 
(New York 1908), Loeb, E. M., Tribal Initiations and 
Secret Societies, Umveisity of California, Publications 
in American Archeology and Ethnology, vol xxv, no. 
3 (Berkeley 1929), Speiser, Felix, "Uber Initiationen 
in Austiahen und Neu-Guinea" in Naturforschende 
Gesellschaft, Basel, Verhandlungen, vol xl (1929) 53- 
258; Willoughby, II R , Pagan Regeneration (Chicago 
1929) chs. vn, x, Hall, G. S , "Initiations into Adoles- 
cence" in American Antiquarian Society, Proceedings, 
n.s , vol xn (1897-98) 367-400, Reik, T., "Die 
Pubertatsriten der Wilden" in Imago, vol. iv (1915 
16) 125-44, 189-222. 

INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM. The 
initiative is a device by which any person or 
group of persons may draft a proposed ordi- 
nance, law or constitutional amendment and by 
securing in its behalf a designated number of 
signatures may require that such proposal be 
submitted to the voters for their acceptance or 
rejection. The referendum, on the other hand, is 
an arrangement whereby any measure which has 
been passed by a city council or state legislature 
may under certain circumstances be withheld 
from going into force until the voters have had 
an opportunity to render their decision upon it. 
Thus the initiative and referendum logically go 
together and supplement each other. They were 



Initiation Initiative and Referendum 



grouped with the recall (q.v.) of public officials 
in the movement in the early part of the twen- 
tieth century for "more democracy to cure the 
ills of democracy. " 

The initiative and referendum are by no 
means new features in the mechanism of popular 
government. All ancient democracy was direct 
democracy. In the Greek city-states all legisla- 
tion was initiated by the people and authorized 
by direct popular vote without the intervention 
of representatives. In the cantons of the Swiss 
republic the initiative and referendum have had 
a virtually continuous history from earliest times 
down to the present day. Even in the United 
States the initiative and referendum are among 
the oldest of native institutions. The initiative, 
for example, was given recognition in 1777 in 
the first constitution of the state of Georgia, 
which bestowed upon the people the exclusive 
right to propose constitutional changes. The 
referendum was brought into use before the 
adoption of the earliest American state constitu- 
tions and has been compulsory in the process of 
constitutional amendment in practically all states 
ever since. 

But the use of the initiative and referendum in 
the process of ordinary law making is a relatively 
modern development in the United States, al- 
though sporadic examples may be found in 
various states during the latter half of the nine- 
teenth century. More particularly the referen- 
dum was used as a means of expressing the 
direct voice of the people in certain localities on 
such matters as bond issues and the sale of in- 
toxicating liquors. Not infrequently moreover 
state legislatures and city councils referred to 
the people some other controversial matters 
upon which they could not themselves agree. 

Not until the closing years of the nineteenth 
century, however, did any American state au- 
thorize the use of the initiative and referendum 
as regular instruments for the making of ordi- 
nary laws. This first step was taken in South 
Dakota in 1898; Utah followed in 1900, Oregon 
in 1902 and seventeen other states during the 
ensuing three decades. Two other states have 
adopted the referendum but not the initiative. 

The chief reason for the spread of direct legis- 
lation in the United States is to be found in the 
impatience of the people with the work of their 
state legislatures. By reason of the lack of author- 
itative leadership, the persistent lobbying on the 
part of special interests and the intermittent con- 
trol of legislative bodies by political bosses a 
great deal of dissatisfaction with the work of 



these legislatures developed during the closing 
years of the nineteenth century. People came to 
the conclusion that by their own direct action 
they could hardly do worse and might do better. 
Consequently they took into their own hands the 
power to make and to reject laws not as a pro- 
cedure for everyday use, but merely as a method 
to be used when the desired results could not be 
had in any other way. 

The first step in the exercise of the popular 
initiative is the framing of a proposed ordinance, 
law or constitutional amendment. This is usually 
undertaken by some organization. Then it be- 
comes necessary to secure a designated number 
of signatures in support of the proposal. From 5 
to 8 percent of the qualified voters is the usual 
requirement. The petition is then submitted to 
some designated public official, who checks the 
names and if he finds them sufficient makes out a 
certificate to that effect. After this the measure is 
placed on the ballot, usually in abbreviated form 
or by title, and the voters record their decision 
upon it at the next regular election or at a special 
election called for the purpose. When a measure 
has been adopted by the people in this way it can- 
not ordinarily be amended or repealed by any 
action of the legislature. Generally speaking, the 
referendum follows the same general lines, ex- 
cept that the petition merely demands that a par- 
ticular measure passed by the legislative body be 
submitted to the whole electorate before being 
put into effect. 

Both initiative and referendum have been 
widely used by municipalities and by states, 
especially in the western part of the country, 
during the past thirty years. Sometimes as many 
as thirty questions have been placed on the bal- 
lot for decision by the voters at a regular state 
election. These proposals have been of every 
type, ranging from matters of fundamental pol- 
icy to altogether trivial issues, from the levying of 
a state income tax down to the length of the 
luncheon hour in a city's fire department. 

This submission is usually accompanied by a 
flood of propaganda on the part of the interested 
groups. It was anticipated that individual voters 
would study the various questions, make up 
their minds and cast their votes accordingly. To 
some extent the voters do this, especially when 
only a few questions are submitted; but with 
twenty or thirty questions on the ballot the great 
mass of the voters either follow the advice of 
some organization or are influenced by the ad- 
vertising campaign. It has been demonstrated 
that a sufficiently vigorous publicity campaign 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



52 

can usually encompass the adoption or defeat of 
any measure in which the people do not feel that 
they have a definite interest. 

In practise moreover direct legislation has 
proved to be lawmaking by a minority. On the 
average not more than 80 percent of those regis- 
tered vote on election day, and the proportion is 
usually much smaller. Moreover many of those 
who vote give all their attention to candidates 
and do not concern themselves with the questions 
on the ballot. Hence measures are sometimes 
adopted or defeated at the polls by only 25 or 
30 percent of the whole electorate. 

The adoption of the initiative and referendum 
was urged a quarter of a century ago by the 
progressive elements, who took for granted that 
if the people were allowed to legislate directly 
they would give their assent to progressive meas- 
ures. On this basis the conservatives fought the 
movement in its early stages, while liberals wel- 
comed the initiative and referendum as weapons 
with which to curtail the political power of the 
vested interests. But direct legislation has not 
proved to be revolutionary; on the contrary, it 
has been at least of equal value as a bulwark of 
conservatism. Voters in American cities and 
states have not hesitated to reject proposals for 
adopting the single tax or undertaking municipal 
ownership of public utilities, for giving pensions 
to city employees or imposing progressive in- 
come taxes. The use of the initiative and refer- 
endum appears to be slowly but steadily lessen- 
ing in the United States. This may be a symp- 
tom of declining faith in political democracy and 
of increasing interest in some form of pluralism. 

A part of the same progressive movement and 
closely related to the referendum was the demand 
for the recall of judicial decisions advocated by 
Roosevelt in his campaign of 1912 and adopted 
by Colorado in the same year. Under this pro- 
posal judicial decisions declaring invalid laws 
passed by the state legislature would be sub- 
jected to popular vote under conditions similar 
to those set forth for the legislative referendum. 
If a majority of those voting upheld the law, it 
would become valid despite the decision of the 
court. The movement made no headway and the 
Colorado provision was never invoked. 

Outside of the United States the initiative and 
referendum have been used most frequently and 
effectively in Switzerland. There too, however, 
the response of the voters has almost uniformly 
been less than in the choice of parliamentary 
representatives. The average vote at initiative 
and referendum elections has been slightly less 



than three fourths of the average vote at elections 
for the National Council, although it has on one 
occasion gone above the latter average. As in the 
United States, the effect of direct legislation has 
been slightly conservative. 

Direct legislation was accorded a great deal of 
favor in the democratic post-war constitutions of 
European countries. Germany adopted the ini- 
tiative and the referendum for the country as a 
whole, the largest political unit to attempt their 
use; they were also adopted by the German 
Lander. The adoption of direct legislation in the 
post-war constitutions was characterized by a 
number of innovations. Most interesting of these 
were the powers given the president and one 
third of the lower house in connection with the 
referendum; the use of the referendum to decide 
deadlocks between the two houses; the automatic 
dissolution of the Estonian Seimas following a 
popular vote contrary to the vote of the Seimas 
on a particular measure; and the German provi- 
sion that an absolute majority of the qualified 
voters is needed to carry a referendum proposal 
involving constitutional questions and that a 
majority of the qualified voters must vote in any 
referendum in order to make its results valid. 
The complications resulting from these varia- 
tions have militated against the practical utility 
of the initiative and the referendum. In actual 
practise they have been employed to a very slight 
extent in these countries, even less than in the 
United States. 

WILLIAM B. MUNRO 

See: DEMOCRACY; LEGISLATION; REPRESENTATION; 
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLIES; MACHINE, POLITICAL; PUB- 
LIC OPINION; PROPAGANDA; RECALL; PLEBISCITE. 

Consult: For a full list of earlier books, Munro, W. B., 
A Bibliography of Municipal Government in the U rated 
States, Harvard University, Publications of the Bu- 
reau for Research in Municipal Government, vol. ii 
(Cambridge, Mass. 1915) p. 48-56, and New York, 
State Library, Legislative Reference Bureau, Bibliog- 
raphy of Books and Articles on Initiative, Referendum 
and Recall 1912-1924 (Albany 1924); Lowell, A. L., 
Public Opinion and Popular Government (new ed. New 
York 1926) chs. xi-xv; Schmitt, Carl, Volksentscheid 
und Volksbegehren, Institut fur auslandisches fiffent- 
liches Recht und Volkerrecht, Beitrdge, vol. ii (Berlin 
1927); Hall, Arnold B., Popular Government (New 
York 1921) chs. vi and viii; Bonjour, Felix, La demo- 
cratie suisse (Lausanne 1919), tr. by C. L. Leese as 
Real Democracy in Operation: the Example of Switzer- 
land (London 1920) chs. iv-vn; Brooks, R. C., Civic 
Training in Switzerland (Chicago 1930) p. 107-18; 
Headlam-Morley, Agnes, The New Democratic Con- 
stitutions of Europe (London 1928) ch. viii; Thoma, 
Richard, "Referendum in Germany" in Society of 
Comparative Legislation and International Law^our- 
nal t 3rd sen, vol. x (1928) 55-73. 



INJUNCTION. This very effective judicial 
order usually commands a party to a suit and if 
necessary commands his associates to refrain 
from action which the court considers to be 
wrongful or a hindrance to the attainment of 
justice. Less frequently it commands the per- 
formance of acts conducive to justice. Disobedi- 
ence to the injunction is contempt of court, 
punishable by imprisonment or other severe 
penalties. With rare exceptions all questions as to 
the issue of the injunction and disobedience 
thereof are decided by a court without a jury. 

Injunctions originated in the English Court 
of Chancery. Requests for them by litigants indi- 
cate that they were granted as early as 1400. 
Several injunctions are recorded during the 
fifteenth century, but the first of which the text 
is extant dates from 1483 (i Cal. Ch. cxiii). 

The sources from which the chancellor de- 
rived the injunction are obscure. Although 
several writers have emphasized the resemblance 
of its language to the Roman law interdict, the 
methods of enforcing the latter were very dif- 
ferent and much feebler. Any direct imitation 
of the interdict by the chancellors is unproved 
and improbable, but the interdict had a remote 
influence through its long development in the 
canon law. The ecclesiastical interdict forbid- 
ding religious services in a particular place offers 
a much closer analogy to the injunction. The 
canon law recognized other forms of orders for- 
bidding specified acts, and since the chancellors 
were almost invariably churchmen until the 
sixteenth century they would very naturally ap- 
ply in civil litigation a type of remedy which had 
been found effective in ecclesiastical controver- 
sies. A second probable source was the proce- 
dure of the common law courts. For nearly two 
centuries before the earliest indication of in- 
junctions in Chancery the writ of prohibition 
had issued against waste injuries to land by 
tenants. This writ sometimes differed from the 
injunction in that the order was directed not to 
the defendant but to the sheriff, who could take 
a posse comitatus and stop the waste. Many other 
types of wrongs were subject to prohibitions 
and subsequently, like waste, to injunctions. A 
third probable source lay in other proceedings in 
Chancery itself. For instance, subpoenas issued 
at the start of an equity suit commanded the de- 
fendant under a penalty to appear and answer 
the bill. It was only a step to impose a penalty 
for failure to obey some other command of the 
chancellor during the course of the suit. It is 
significant that injunctions apparently began 



Injunction 53 

about thirty years after the earliest subpoenas. 

The early chancellors were bound to no rigid 
and settled procedure. They were looking about 
for any remedy that might prove effective. This 
experimental attitude is illustrated by a Chan- 
cery suit about 1400 (Selden Society Publica- 
tions, vol. x, Sel. Cas. in Ch., no. 70) asking for 
a writ directed to the sheriff and justices of the 
peace commanding them to order the defend- 
ants to allow the plaintiff to occupy his land 
without disturbance a counterpart of the com- 
mon law writ of prohibition. In another suit the 
chancellor might dispense with the officials as 
intermediaries and address the writ to the de- 
fendants themselves a true injunction. This 
makes it even clearer that the injunction was a 
natural development of methods of enforcing 
obedience which were in use in England in the 
fourteenth century. 

The subsequent history of the injunction is 
bound up with the general history of equity. As 
the equitable jurisdiction of Chancery spread 
over new fields, the scope of the injunction cor- 
respondingly widened, for it was one of the most 
powerful weapons for carrying out the chancel- 
lor's determination of rights. Resort to the in- 
junction was also stimulated by the gradual dis- 
appearance of prohibitions and other preventive 
common law remedies which proved unsuited to 
the mechanism of trial by jury. Until 1700 in- 
junctions were likely to be used for two main 
purposes. First, they protected interests in land, 
then the chief form of property, although some 
cases involved chattels like title deeds, jewelry 
and heirlooms. Secondly, legal proceedings or 
judgments founded on unjust grounds were fre- 
quently enjoined by the chancellor, who thus 
corrected the defects of the common law courts, 
a practise which aroused the resentment of the 
law judges and culminated in the famous contro- 
versy between Coke and Ellesmere. Thenceforth 
if the rules of equity conflicted with those of the 
common law, the injunction enabled the rules of 
equity to prevail. The growth of business in the 
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries led to new 
types of private wrongs for which the injunction 
was needed. It was also employed against public 
nuisances as urban congestion rendered these 
more numerous and more injurious. With the 
disappearance of separate courts of equity in 
England and most of the United States and the 
consolidation of legal and equitable powers in 
the same courts, all trial judges (except those in 
petty courts) acquired the power to grant in- 
junctions. But the constitutional guaranty of a 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



54 

jury trial does not apply to injunction proceed- 
ings, for it was not customary in equity courts 
when the constitutions were adopted. 

Injunctions are classified chronologically into 
ex parte restraining orders, temporary injunc- 
tions and permanent injunctions. These may be 
conveniently discussed in reverse order. Perma- 
nent injunctions are granted at the end of a suit 
after both sides have fully presented their evi- 
dence and the case has been decided on the 
merits. Temporary (or interlocutory) injunctions 
are granted during the course of the suit and 
framed to prevent acts which might prejudice its 
final results. Sometimes such injunctions are said 
to preserve the status quo, but this does not 
necessarily mean the maintenance of the existing 
situation without change. The phrase merely de- 
scribes the situation which the court thinks it 
just to maintain until the merits have been de- 
cided. Temporary injunctions are issued after 
notice to the defendant and a brief opportunity 
for both sides to present evidence and argu- 
ments, but without the fulness required for 
permanent injunctions. They may also be dis- 
solved before the final decree if the defendant 
shows that they were improperly issued or have 
become undesirable. The plantiff is frequently 
required as a condition of temporary relief to 
give bond. Ex parte restraining orders resemble 
temporary injunctions and are frequently called 
by the same name; but they are issued at the out- 
set of a suit on the basis of proof presented by the 
plantiff alone in the form of affidavits or oral 
testimony, without any chance for the defendant 
to be heard or to cross examine. This drastic 
remedy should be given only on a showing of 
great urgency, and the defendant should be af- 
forded an early opportunity to attempt to vacate 
or modify the order. 

Injunctions are also classified according to 
their form, as prohibitory (negative) and manda- 
tory (affirmative). Since the very numerous 
simple affirmative orders to sign deeds, pay 
money and the like are not called injunctions, 
the term mandatory injunction is applied only 
to orders for the performance of more complex 
or unusual acts, and such orders are much less 
frequent than prohibitory injunctions. A cen- 
tury ago mandatory injunctions were theoreti- 
cally regarded as improper, although they had 
been granted in several early cases. Defendants, 
however, were in effect required to perform af- 
firmative acts through the ingenious but not in- 
genuous method of negative language forbidding 
them to allow the existing situation to continue. 



Thus if a defendant had wrongfully cut a door- 
way in the plaintiff's brick wall, the court would 
enjoin him from permitting the opening to re- 
main. The English judges have now repudiated 
these roundabout methods. During the nine- 
teenth century courts were especially hostile to 
mandatory injunctions ordering the construction 
of a building, the operation of a railroad and 
other detailed or prolonged activities, but they 
are now increasingly ready to regard such ob- 
jections as merely a factor to be weighed against 
the hardship upon the plaintiff if left to his ac- 
tion for damages. As Judge Hough has said, 
"The tendency of the times is to 'take on' harder 
and longer jobs" [Kearns-Gorsuch Bottle Co. v. 
Hartford-Fairmont Co., i Fed. ,2nd, 3 18(1921)]. 
Mandatory injunctions are usually permartent, 
because it would be harsh in most cases to make 
a defendant perform elaborate and expensive 
acts to which the plaintiff may prove in the end 
not to be entitled. 

The definiteness of injunctions varies greatly 
with different judges. Some use general terms, 
such as forbidding any acts which operate "to 
the injury of the plaintiff" or "render his 
premises unfit for use and enjoyment as a resi- 
dence by reasonable and normal persons." The 
defendant is thus left to ascertain for himself 
"how near he may with safety drive to the edge 
of the precipice, and whether it be not better for 
him to keep as far from it as possible" [Charles 
E. Hires Co. v. Consumers' Co., 100 Fed. 809 
(1900)] . A preferable view is that an injunction is 
analogous to a criminal statute and ought to be 
equally definite and clear in its terms; when 
practicable it should discriminate carefully be- 
tween the acts which are lawful for the defend- 
ant and those which are unlawful [Collins v. 
Wayne Iron Works, 227 Pa. 326 (1910)]. An un- 
learned man should be able to understand it 
without employing counsel. Flexible decrees 
may also be framed directing the use of remedial 
devices with the hope that they will end the in- 
jury and at the same time avoid the necessity of 
closing down the defendant's business until he 
has had an opportunity for installing and testing 
such devices. Meanwhile the case can be kept 
open for further action after the results of ex- 
perimentation have been ascertained. Unlike a 
judgment for damages, which is necessarily 
simple and final, an injunction can contain many 
qualifications adapted to the facts and can be 
modified from time to time if changes are made 
desirable by new evidence or new conditions. 
This flexibility renders the injunction an ad- 



mirable instrument for judicial handling of the 
complexities of modern life. 

Injunctions are applied in a great variety of 
well settled situations. In connection with the 
specific performance (q v.) of contracts both 
mandatory and prohibitory injunctions may be 
issued. The commonest use is against torts in- 
juring real and personal property and various in- 
tangible business rights. A threatened or existing 
wrong will ordinarily be enjoined if the legal 
remedy (an action for damages) is inadequate. 
For instance, the defendant threatens to destroy 
a grove of oaks, which no money damages could 
replace. The prevention of "irreparable injury" 
is sometimes stated to be an indispensable requi- 
site for injunctions, but this is true only if the 
phrase is understood in a loose sense to include 
situations where the legal remedy is inadequate 
for other reasons besides the impossibility of 
physical replacement. Thus an injunction may 
be granted when the defendant is insolvent, so 
that a judgment at law would be worthless; or 
when the extent of the prospective injury to the 
plaintiff's business could not be accurately meas- 
ured by a jury; or when the defendant threatens 
a long series of wrongs which would lead to a 
vexatious multiplicity of suits. Likewise in 
many cases not involving torts the injunction 
may be used to obtain joinder of causes of action 
growing out of the same transaction. 

Cfther acts enjoined include breaches of trust, 
improper foreclosures and judicial sales, the 
exercise of eminent domain powers before com- 
pensation to the owner is paid or secured and (in 
some states) the enforcement of illegal taxes. 
Partners can enjoin improper uses of the firm 
property; stockholders sometimes have a similar 
remedy against waste of the corporate assets and 
other wrongful acts by officers and directors; 
taxpayers can prevent the unlawful expenditure 
of public money. 

The frequent assertion that injunctions will 
not issue to protect interests of personality, like 
reputation or freedom from bodily restraints and 
mental annoyances, rests on no principle of jus- 
tice. Indeed the injunction is much better 
adapted than the jury action for damages to deal 
satisfactorily with some subtle injuries, such as a 
series of insulting letters persistently sent to a 
nervous person. Recent courts have been in- 
creasingly willing to enjoin wrongs to personality. 
Each type of such injuries, however, presents 
special considerations which ought to make a 
judge cautious in granting relief. For instance, it 
is doubtful whether an injunction can practically 



Injunction 55 

succeed in terminating the illicit association of a 
plaintiff's wife or daughter with her paramour. 
Again, improper expulsions of members of 
clubs, churches and other associations injure the 
member's personal enjoyment and standing in 
the community; but indiscriminate judicial in- 
terference by injunction or mandamus (q-v.) 
with the internal affairs of these associations 
may cause objectionable results. 

The desirability of the injunction for dealing 
with numerous civil wrongs is generally recog- 
nized, but serious doubts have been aroused by 
its rapidly extending use in the United States 
for two other purposes checking activities 
which might be prosecuted criminally and up- 
setting administrative orders and decisions. 

Since the 1890*8 the injunction has been in- 
creasingly employed in the United States as a 
substitute for criminal proceedings. The situa- 
tion recalls the Wars of the Roses, when crim- 
inals were brought to justice in Chancery be- 
cause the law courts were helpless to cope with 
the widespread disorders of the time and judges 
and juries were cowed or corrupted by powerful 
offenders. But since 1500 crimes as such have 
had to be established in the criminal courts, 
where the accused has a right to trial by jury. 
However, additional factors of an equitable na- 
ture might bring some criminal acts within the 
scope of injunctive relief. For example, a 
threatened criminal act might also be a private 
wrong which would cause irreparable injury to 
property; then the owner could enjoin the act 
regardless of its criminal aspects. This principle, 
occasionally used for centuries, has become very 
important within the last few decades, because 
upon it rests the frequent issue of labor injunc- 
tions (q.v.\ 

Another long established principle allowed the 
attorney general or other official to enjoin as well 
as prosecute public nuisances, like a highway ob- 
struction, a chemical factory spreading poison- 
ous fumes and other structures which consti- 
tuted a source of continuing injury to the public 
health and convenience. This power has like- 
wise been much enlarged of late through legisla- 
tion or judicial decisions bringing many addi- 
tional crimes under the head of public nuisances. 
Prosecutors have used the injunction to break up 
prize fights, gambling dens, red light districts 
and illegal saloons. The Volstead Act and other 
statutes against liquor selling authorize "pad- 
lock injunctions." Many vice and liquor laws 
allow these injunctions to be obtained by a group 
of neighboring taxpayers when the district at- 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



torney takes no action because he is too busy or 
lazy or he is too tolerant or friendly to the 
lawbreakers. 

How far can criminal acts be removed from 
the constitutional guaranty of a jury trial by the 
simple process of labeling them publ ic nuisances ? 
Conservative judges and writers would limit the 
extension to crimes which roughly resemble the 
older types of such nuisances and they insist 
that the so-called nuisance must possess a local 
habitation of some permanence, from which dis- 
orders and public annoyances radiate and which 
can serve as the focus of the attack by the in- 
junction. A more radical view dispenses with 
these requisites and allows the public prosecu- 
tor to enjoin unlocalized groups of persons from 
continuing alleged illegal activities, such as 
large strikes or criminal syndicalism. An occa- 
sional syndicalism statute, as in New Hamp- 
shire, expressly authorizes such injunctions; but 
Kansas and California judges have endeavored 
to break up the Industrial Workers of the World 
by blanket injunctions without any legislative 
sanction other than the statutory creation of this 
new crime. 

This resort by public officials to the injunction 
to stop illegal establishments and revolutionary 
organizations is defended on several grounds. 
Public safety is then much more surely and 
rapidly maintained than by criminal proceedings. 
The police will not arrest for some of these of- 
fenses, and juries will not convict. In any case a 
jury trial means delay, and the grand jury where 
still required adds another burden. In a criminal 
trial the defendant's guilt must be proved be- 
yond a reasonable doubt, while a padlock in- 
junction or a jail sentence for contempt can be 
obtained on a bare preponderance of the evi- 
dence. Furthermore a prosecution cannot be 
brought until a crime has been committed, while 
an injunction can often forestall the offense and 
thus prevent any injury to the public. Finally, an 
injunction is sometimes more humane to de- 
fendants. If successfully prosecuted they will be 
punished for acts which perhaps they thought 
legal, whereas an injunction gets rid of the ob- 
jectionable establishment without punishing in- 
dividuals, so long as they obey the court order. 
An injunction tells the defendant exactly what 
he must not do and so serves as a much fairer 
warning than a general criminal statute, which 
men sometimes disobey without knowing it. 
This partial absence of the punitive element 
avoids the vindictive atmosphere surrounding a 
criminal trial and makes it easier to obtain a de- 



cision in the state's favor. In short, injunctions 
are much more efficient than prosecutions. 

These frequent public injunctions, however, 
against acts which were formerly prosecuted 
criminally raise grave objections. The accused is 
deprived of trial by jury and of all the normal 
safeguards of the criminal law. Even if the de- 
fendants are in fact lawbreakers, the community 
may gain less from the increased efficiency of the 
injunction than it loses from the resentment 
caused. The responsibility in criminal prosecu- 
tions is shared by the jury, but in these injunc- 
tion suits it falls entirely upon the judge. The 
turning of equity judges into superpolicemen 
creates the risk of arousing a hostility which may 
eventually lead to drastic restrictions upon t}ieir 
powers, even over matters where equitable relief 
is badly needed for the accomplishment of jus- 
tice. The breakdown of the criminal law in the 
United States is the real reason for the increasing 
use of the injunction against criminal activities. 
It would certainly be better to reorganize the ad- 
ministration of criminal justice than to continue 
to rely upon this substitute. 

The injunction is also much used in the 
United States against the administrative acts of 
public officials, such as the collection of taxes, 
the regulation of business and the fixing of rates 
by public utility commissions. This injunctive 
relief is especially important when the constitu- 
tionality of the statutes under which the officials 
are acting is questioned. Although the plaintiff 
must allege the existence of some normal ground 
for equitable jurisdiction, such as multiplicity of 
suits or the probability of irreparable injury, the 
courts do not scrutinize these grounds closely. 
The real purpose of the injunction is to obtain a 
judicial review of the administrative order; and 
in some jurisdictions for instance, the federal 
courts it has become the regular method of ac- 
complishing this result, which may be attained 
elsewhere by an entirely different procedure, like 
certiorari in New York. The injunction has the 
advantage of raising questions of the validity of 
administrative action at an early date, but it is 
absurd for one branch of the government to be 
trying to do something while another branch is 
exerting itself to prevent it. The process is like 
putting on the brake while the accelerator is 
pressed down. Additional objections arise when 
lower federal courts block state administrative 
bodies by this summary method, which although 
desired by plaintiffs may not be the wisest way of 
adjusting delicate conflicts between different 
parts of the federal system. Because of the readi- 



Injunction Innocent III 



ness with which single United States judges en- 
joined orders of the Interstate Commerce Com- 
mission or state commissions on constitutional 
grounds, a series of acts of Congress required 
three federal judges to participate in such action 
and imposed other restrictions (U. S. Code, tit. 
28, sects. 47, 380). Perhaps a more straightfor- 
ward method than the injunction for the judicial 
review of administrative decisions would be de- 
sirable in both state and federal courts. 

The modern law of continental Europe has no 
precise counterpart to the injunction. Its work is 
performed by several different remedies. Un- 
lawful acts are prevented by administrative 
orders and police action more than in the United 
Stages. The civil tribunals, which recognize no 
distinction between law and equity, enforce 
their judgments whenever possible by execution 
in natura, by which through the aid of officers 
comparable to sheriffs the plaintiff gets the very 
thing to which he is legally entitled instead of 
a money substitute, as in Anglo-American actions 
at law. A similar remedy in Anglo-American 
courts would often render injunctions needless. 
Interlocutory relief is less common than in 
Anglo-American law but can be obtained 
through attachment and other forms of sum- 
mary procedure when speed is necessary. Since 
administrative decisions cannot be reviewed in 
the civil courts but only in administrative courts, 
anyrfiing resembling the injunction against of- 
ficial acts is naturally impossible. 

ZECHARIAH CHAFEE, JR. 

See: EQUITY; LABOR INJUNCTION; WRITS, LEGAL; 
CONTEMPT OF COURT; JURY SYSTFM; CRIMINAL LAW; 
PROCEDURE, LEGAL; DAMAGES; SPECIFIC PERI-ORMANCI-; 
NUISANCES; MANDAMUS. 

Consult: Select Cases in Chancery A.D. 1364 to 1471, 
ed. by W. P. Baildon, Selden Society Publications, 
vol. x (London 1896), Great Britain, Record Com- 
mission, Calendars of the Proceedings in Chancery, 3 
vols. (London 1827-32) vol. i; High, J. L., A Treatise 
on the Law of Injunctions, 2 vols. (4th ed. Chicago 
1905); Spelling, T. C., A Treatise on Injunctions and 
Other Extraordinary Remedies, 2 vols. (2nd ed. Boston 
1901); Pomeroy, J. N., A Treatise on Equity Jurispru- 
dence, 6 vols. (4th ed. by J. N. Pomeroy, Jr., San 
Francisco 1918-19) vols. iv-v; Martin, W. A., "In- 
junctions" in Corpus juris, vol. xxxii (New York 1923) 
1-51; "Injunctions" in Ruling Case Law, vol. xiv 
(1916) 298-489; Klein, Jacob, "Mandatory Injunc- 
tions" in Harvard Law Review, vol. xii (1898-99) 95- 
1 1 8; Durfee, E. N., "Nebulous Injunctions" m Michi- 
gan Law Review, vol. xix (1920-21) 83-86, and vol. 
xxiii (1924-25) 53-56; Chafee, Zechariah, Jr., Cases 
on Equitable Relief against Torts (Cambridge, Mass. 
1924), The Inquiring Mind (New York 1928), and 
"The Internal Affairs of Associations Not for Profit" 
in Harvard Law Review, vol. xliii (1929-30) 993-1029; 



57 

Pound, Roscoe, Cases on Equitable Relief against Defa- 
mation and Injuries to Personality (2nd ed. Cambridge, 
Mass. 1930), and "Equitable Relief against Defama- 
tion and Injuries to Personality" in Harvard Law 
Review, vol. xxix (1915-16) 640-82, Caldwell, Har- 
mon, "Injunctions against Crime" in Illinois Law 
Review, vol. xxvi (1931-32) 250-81; Freund, Ernst, 
Administrative Powers over Persons and Property (Chi- 
cago 1928); Isseks, S. S., "Jurisdiction of the Lower 
Federal Courts to Enjoin Unauthorized Action of 
State Officials" in Harvard Law Review, vol. xl (1926- 
27) 969-88; Pogue, Welch, "State Determination of 
State Law and the Judicial Code" in Harvard Law 
Review, vol. xh (1927-28) 623-42; "The Three Judge 
Rule" in Yale Law Journal, vol. xxxviii (1928-29) 
955-65; Lockwood, John E , and others, "The Use 
of the Federal Injunction m Constitutional Litiga- 
tion" in Harvard Law Review, vol. xhu (1929-30) 
426-57. For continental law, see Neitzel, Walter, 
'Specific Performance, Injunctions, and Damages in 
the German Law" in Harvard Law Review, vol. xxii 
(1908-09) i6r-8i, Huston, C. A., The Enforcement of 
Decrees in Equity (Cambridge, Mass. 1915) ch. in, 
and latest editions of continental books cited therein. 
See also the bibliography following the article EQUITY. 

INLAND WATERWAYS. See WATERWAYS, 
INLAND. 

INNOCENTIII(LothardeiConti)(n6i-i2i6), 
pope from 1198. Innocent's activities as pope 
were largely concerned with the two problems of 
reviving and propagating the orthodox faith and 
firmly establishing the political power of the 
papacy. In connection with the first, his pontifi- 
cate is famous for the Albigensian crusade, which 
he finally launched in 1207 as a last resort to ex- 
tinguish that heresy; and for the fourth crusade 
to the East, which, after he had failed to divert it 
from Zara and Constantinople, brought him the 
glory as well as the responsibility of establishing 
the Latin rite in the western portion of the 
Eastern Empire. His management of the second 
problem marks one of the high points of papal 
influence over secular powers. The death of the 
Holy Roman emperor Henry vi in 1 197 and the 
reaction against Henry's lieutenants in Italy 
allowed Innocent to assume shortly after his 
elevation a commanding position both in Ger- 
many, where the recognition of the future em- 
peror depended upon his support, and in south- 
ern Italy and Sicily, where Henry's wife, Con- 
stance, became his vassal in order to secure pro- 
tection for her son, the future Frederick n. In 
the matter of the vacant empire Innocent decided 
for reasons ultimately dictated by fear of the 
Hohenstaufens to support the Guelph candidate, 
Otto iv, against the two Hohenstaufens Philip 
of Swabia and Frederick. The reasons for his 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



decision he gave in his famous Deliberatio upon 
the courses open to him. In so intervening he 
provided the first legal basis for the papal right 
to confirm imperial elections, founding this right 
on the original transference of the empire by the 
papacy from the Greeks to the Germans. At the 
same time the eviction of the German governors 
from central Italy and Otto's oath never to unite 
central Italy with Sicily enabled Innocent to ex- 
tend the Papal States to their widest boundaries. 
After 1204 he was complete master of Rome. lie 
exercised feudal sovereignty over Portugal, over 
Aragon and, after he had broken down John's 
opposition, over England. He attached the Bul- 
garo-Wallachian kingdom to the Holy See. He 
intervened drastically in the aft'airs of the Scandi- 
navian kingdom to support the local church re- 
formers against King Sverre. With Philip 
Augustus of France he was never fully successful. 
In the face of the pope's exhortations and fulmi- 
nations Philip refused for years to enter into con- 
jugal relations with his lawful wife, Ingeborg. 
His great triumph came when the perfidy of the 
Guelph Otto iv forced Innocent to admit the 
correctness of Philip's view that Guelph domi- 
nation in Germany was dangerous. Innocent had 
to excommunicate Otto and to secure his deposi- 
tion by the princes and the election of the young 
Frederick as emperor. To end the trouble he had 
to organize Europe against the party which he 
had originally supported and to form a coalition 
with the Hohenstaufens and the French, which 
defeated Otto and his ally, King John, at 
Bouvines in 1214. 

In the realm of political ideas Innocent in 
with his high yet cautious claims stands midway 
between Gregory vn and Boniface vin. Chris- 
tendom, he maintained, was not only a moral 
unity but a visible, concrete world state under 
clerical guidance; although it was governed by 
territorial rulers, yet each part and the whole 
must recognize the supremacy of the Roman See 
and the plenitude of power held by Peter's suc- 
cessor, the representative of Christ. But when 
he came to intervene in temporal matters Inno- 
cent cautiously limited himself to moral issues. 
He declared that he had no intention to pass 
judgment in matters of feudal custom (judicare 
defeodo) but only to decide cases of moral guilt 
(decernere de peccato), since it was his duty to 
snatch every Christian soul from mortal sin. 
His views on the relations between the civil and 
religious powers he further expressed in his de- 
cretal letter Per venerabilem, addressed to the 
Count of Montpellier. No mediaeval pope has 



had so strong a sense of responsibility for the 
moral welfare of Christendom. As a canonist he 
is of vital importance for his definition and classi- 
fication of existing rules. His court formed a 
school of instruction for Christendom. In mat- 
ters of detail his chief concern was for the purity 
of elections; for the integrity, discipline and edu- 
cational standards of the clergy; for the conser- 
vation of church property; and for the unity of 
the faith on the basis of a dogma at once flexible 
and cautious. These matters were definitely pro- 
vided for by the Latcran Council of 1 2 1 5 . As an 
administrator Innocent made important contri- 
butions to the organization of the papal chancery 
and to the development of the cursus. He also 
laid down rules for the detection of forgery. His 
pontificate saw a prodigious increase of the judi- 
cial and administrative business that came to the 
Holy See. He maintained touch with the various 
parts of Christendom through the system of 
legates so largely employed by Gregory vn. In 
contrast with the latter pontiff Innocent ranks as 
a diplomat and a business man rather than as a 
saint. But like the greatest administrators he 
never set the means before the goal. The asser- 
tion of the plenitude of power was for him an 
avenue to the salvation of souls an end with 
which, as his letters and sermons show, he was 
constantly preoccupied. 

E. F. JACOB 

Works: Opera onima in J. P. Migne's Patrologta latina, 
vols. ccxiv-ccxvii (Pans 1855). 

Consult: Binns, I,. E, Innocent in (London 1931); 
Jacob, E. F , "Innocent in," and Poolc, A L , "Philip 
of Swabia and Otto iv" in Cambridge Medieval His- 
tory, vol. vi (Cambridge, Eng. 1929) chs. i-n; 
Luchaire, Achille, Innocent in, 6 vols. (Pans 1906- 
08), Serafim, A , Innocenzo me la rcforma religiosa 
aglt imzi del secolo xm (Rome 1917); Meyer, E. W , 
Staatstheonen Papst Jnnocenz in., Jenaer histonsche 
Arbeiten, vol. ix (Bonn 1919), Hauck, A., Dcr Gedanke 
der papsthchen Weltherrschaft bis auf Bomfaz vm. 
(Leipsic 1904); Ilaller, Johannes, "Innoccnz ill. und 
Otto iv." m Papsttum und Kaisertum, ed. by Albert 
Brackmann (Munich 1926) p. 475-507; Gutschow, 
Else, Innozenz m. und England, Histonsche Biblio- 
thek, vol. xvin (Munich 1904), Poole, R. L., Lectures 
on the History of the Papal Chancery (Cambridge, Eng. 
1915), Tangl, M , "Die Dehberatio Innocenz m." in 
Akademie dcr Wissenschaften, Sitsungsberichte (1919) 
p. 1012-28; Mohtor, Wilhelm, Die Decretale Per 
Venerabilem von Innocenz in. (Munster 1876); Car- 
lyle, R. W. and A. J., A History of Mediaeval Political 
Theory in the West, vol. v (Edinburgh 1928) pt. ii, 
chs. iii. 

INNOVATION. The changes or novelties of 
rites, techniques, customs, manners and mores 
which constitute innovation are usually thought 



Innocent III Innovation 



59 



of as purposive. The actualities of the social 
process, however, do not validate this connota- 
tion. The attribution of intent is always retro- 
spective. But the causes of innovation are too 
complex to be covered by merely personal intent. 
In so far as human existence is a process and not 
sheer repetition, the rise, the forms, the life 
cycles and the influence of innovations arc the 
vital theme of history and the social sciences. 
Innovation includes in its range the transforma- 
tions in food, clothing, shelter, defense against 
enemies and disease, tools and technologies of 
production and consumption, forms of play and 
sport, rituals and liturgies of religion, precedents 
of law, inventions in science and thought, styles 
and attitudes in literature and the arts. Every so- 
cial institution is a field of innovation, no matter 
how conservative its intent and how standardized 
its techniques and procedures. The limit to in- 
novation comes only at the point where the iden- 
tity of an establishment itself is menaced. 

Within this limit innovations may be numer- 
ous and rapid: the very individuality of the insti- 
tution may consist in them. This is the case 
among the various divisions of science. The es- 
sential of each of these is the process of deliber- 
ate innovation which goes by the name of scien- 
tific method. Scientific method is simply another 
name for the gathering, testing and applying of 
innovations. How these innovations arc reached 
is iiKlifferent. Every innovation involves a certain 
contingency, a dimension of chance and luck; 
every innovation also begins as focal to some 
particular individual or very small group. Once 
a "scientific" mind has become aware of it, it is 
developed formally and tested experimentally, 
given its chance to succeed or fail. The work of 
breeders of animals, legumes, fruits; the inven- 
tion and elaboration of machines; the transfor- 
mations of the art of medicine in the last fifty 
years, in so far as these have anything deliberate 
in them, all rest on the presumption and use of 
scientific method. This is postulated wherever 
innovation is both deliberate and follows the 
gradients of social change. Where innovation is 
incongruous with those it must either struggle 
for its survival, establishing itself by means of a 
process of give and take with its environment, or 
be imposed by force majeure, as when after a 
revolution or a war the victor imposes upon the 
defeated a new way of doing or thinking. 

Innovation may be slow or rapid, manifold or 
simple, but it is ineluctable. In a sense the mere 
lapse of time is innovating. Aging takes place in 
institutions and societies no less than in woods 



and wines. This autogenous transformation 
through invariant repetition seems, however, 
never to occur in isolation. It is crossed and 
modified by other processes which add novelties 
a priori. Such are inventions, wars, crises and 
catastrophes, migrations, exhaustion of ma- 
terials, exhaustion of interest (i.e. boredom). 
Boredom is a psychic force of innovation which 
deserves more attention than it has received. The 
revulsion which it generates and the subsequent 
searching and seeking are no small part of the 
dynamics of fashion, gaming, sport, crusades, 
exploration, scientific investigations and the like. 
All these involve contacts with changing en- 
vironments, natural and human, osmosis or more 
violent impacts of cultures and consequent in- 
novations. 

The optimal conditions for innovation are a 
certain flexibility and readiness in the organic 
pattern of a society itself. These develop as a rule 
more easily in new societies, where a fresh start 
is being made; they develop also during a crisis 
such as a war, a profound business depression, a 
natural catastrophe or a revolution. At such times 
playing upon a ground of fear and uncertainty 
there is a feeling of the significance of the social 
adventure. Novelties are invited, projected and 
perhaps installed and domesticated; experiments 
arc made and change may become a standard of 
public policy. Such was the case in Athens from 
the Persian wars through the Pcloponnesian War 
and in the United States while the frontier 
lasted; it is now the case in Soviet Russia. Where 
custom coheres too firmly and authority is un- 
shaken, the situation is reversed. In primitive 
societies the new way must be assimilated to the 
ways of the fathers before it can be accepted. 
Theocracies require that it shall confirm before 
it can be confirmed by the divine authority 
which they wield. Military or bureaucratic es- 
tablishments reject it if it does not conform to 
the customary patterns and rituals of conduct. 
So does the institution of the law. In all these 
cases the variant is seen as a disorderly interrup- 
tion of set routine and therefore a priori a heresy, 
a sedition and a danger. If its import is acknowl- 
edged and it is adopted it is usually denatured of 
all qualities inharmonious with the established 
procedure. Apparently only a crisis, the feeling 
of danger at hand, can transform this habitual 
inertia into a readiness to try new tools and ways. 
Thus the range and degree of international co- 
operation between the Allies during the World 
War, especially during 1917-18, have never 
been reached since and are being denounced in 



6o 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



peace by the very innovators who developed 
this cooperation during the war. Now in 1932 
the whole world suffers because of the absence 
of this cooperation, which inherently would be 
far more competent in peace than in war. But 
now that the war crisis is over, the "elder states- 
men" have relapsed into the elder ways. The 
peace crisis is insufficient to raise them out; and 
international cooperation, which goes inevitably 
with the diffusion of the industrial economy, is 
being held back by traditionalists in power 
anxious about the status quo of their rights and 
privileges. Should the crisis become profound 
enough, the innovation will be sped and facili- 
tated. 

Innovators are not necessarily rebels and the 
temper of innovation is not by any means the 
temper of revolt. Novelties, spontaneous devia- 
tions of the same energy, continually pour from 
the main stream of custom and convention. 
Thus the industrial revolution in England, the 
growth and diffusion of the factory system in the 
United States, in Germany and in Japan, took 
place mainly in the context of the old mores and 
on the initiative and by the effort of persons who 
were on the whole champions of those mores. 
Now the mores are being transformed and dis- 
placed by what they allowed. Again, the impact 
of photography and the theory of color vision on 
the painter's art constituted a fecundation of 
method and a diversion of ideals. The impres- 
sionists began by affirming the novelty and were 
forced into a defensive denying of the tradition. 
So-called modern movements are innovations 
only because of reaction against the innovation 
which photography itself represented. The intent 
of the post-impressionist schools was conserva- 
tive; their achievements were innovations. 

Nevertheless, innovators are forced into a 
combative position. For their novelties enter a 
social organization most of whose establishments 
are going concerns, and enter as competitors and 
deprecators of one or another. If they succeed in 
establishing themselves they become embodied 
in the organic flow of the mores. They cause that 
flow to deviate to a slightly different gradient de- 
finable by what they represent. This is what the 
city life of the Renaissance did to Christian so- 
ciety in Europe, what the fusion of the scientific 
with the technological attitude did to the eight- 
eenth century mind and what the industrial sys- 
tem is doing to contemporary civilization. Of 
course there are programs of innovation whose 
dynamic is a reaction against the established 
order. Such programs sometimes function as 



precipitates of deep lying emotions which are 
not disturbing enough to change the social order 
but do nourish a formulated opposition to it. 
The opposition becomes organized into cults and 
movements whose rituals and programs then 
identify it as a sort of antibody in the social 
organism. So Methodism grew to maturity in the 
Episcopal milieu of England. The single tax 
movement in the United States is such a devel- 
opment, and such also are cults of diet (like 
vegetarianism), of dress (like nudism), of health 
and of other goods of life. They arise as variants 
and survive as orderly antagonists within the 
nexus of the social process. 

Since all innovations animate readjustments 
in the distribution and organization of social 
forces they automatically evoke the antagonism 
of those who are disturbed. If the antagonism is 
pervasive and deep, the innovation perforce 
lapses. If, however, it satisfies a want or nullifies 
an annoyance, however illusorily, it gathers a 
following. If the following comes from any top 
stratum of the community, from the prestige 
carriers, the innovation may win a great deal of 
superficial favor without modifying the basic 
social processes. It may become fashionable, like 
Christmas trees among Jews; like the consump- 
tion of yeast, liver, tomato juice and other diet- 
ary nostrums; like the recession of the corset and 
the spread of nudism; like the cult of patriotism 
and militarism among women claiming descent 
from revolutionary fathers. The scope and dura- 
tion of the fashion vary with the amount of ef- 
fort that the adoption of the novelty is likely to 
cost; the effort must not be very great in any 
event. If the innovation is relevant to deep lying 
discontents or to feelings of insecurity, then it 
may change the direction of an institutional 
process and break the fashional cycle altogether. 
Thus emulative realization of western attitudes 
and standards has the effect of displacing hara- 
kiri as a social procedure in Japan and face sav- 
ing suicide in China; it has unveiled the women 
of Turkey and unbound Chinese ladies' feet; it 
has created the nationalisms of the Asiatic 
peoples and is profoundly transforming the pat- 
tern and goal of their civilizations. 

Innovations are mostly resisted out of motives 
of self-interest and fear. The new is quite usually 
synonymous with the unreasonable, the danger- 
ous, the impossible. As William James pointed 
out long ago, rationality is a sentiment in which 
the feeling of familiarity is fused with that of 
congruity with our fundamental hopes and de- 
sires. Sometimes mere familiarity may become 



Innovation Inquisition 



identical with this congruity. Thus people resist 
changing their dietary habits in spite of the fact 
that this change is required by health, the social 
setting or religion; there are freethinking Jews 
who get indigestion at the very thought of pork 
and "liberated" Hindus who arc upset by the 
idea of meat. Between love of food and love of 
God or country the difference is in degree, not 
in kind. All involve clinging to the habitual, fa- 
miliar and secure. When that is felt to be men- 
aced, the opposition to innovation becomes 
fanatical, as may be observed in the attitude of 
so-called patriotic societies in the United States 
toward "socialism" and "Bolshevism." One of 
the most curious of phenomena is met when the 
proponents of an innovation that has reached the 
point of toleration turn upon those who propose 
a more extreme innovation in the same direction, 
as is often the case with the socialists and the 
communists. All these attitudes rest funda- 
mentally on a sentiment combining fear and in- 
security. But they become rationalized as "loy- 
alty to the principles of the fathers," "rugged 
individualism," "you can't change human na- 
ture," and the rationalizations are elaborated 
into philosophic systems demonstrating the fore- 
gone conclusion. Such are the various philoso- 
phies of racial supremacy, cultural superiority 
and the like. Where innovations have finally 
established themselves and compel recognition 
they are assimilated to the old order or the old 
order is assimilated to them by means of some 
formula. Thus in the United States "trusts" 
were feared at their origin and laws were passed 
to constrain them. But they developed into the 
dominant controls of the economic process; the 
established order has to count with them and 
acquiesce in them. The Supreme Court of the 
United States celebrated this necessity by the 
well known decision concerning "the rule of 
reason" [Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 
U. S. i (1911)], which has resulted in the virtual 
nullification of the original intent to control the 
trusts rigorously. 

In the light of the foregoing the social position 
of an innovator is determined, other things being 
equal, by the success of his innovation. Persons 
like Edison, Einstein and Marconi have by no 
means entirely overcome the resistance to their 
respective innovations. But they are honored at 
home and abroad. If Jesus of Nazareth can be 
called an innovator, the same thing holds of Him. 
For His status in Europe changed with the com- 
ing to economic and political power of the priests 
of His cult. The same thing is true of Lenin both 



in Russia and abroad and would be of Henry 
George if his program could be imposed at least 
as those of Christ and Lenin have been. If, how- 
ever, an innovation fails to establish itself, its 
projector may be thrown into jail, like Roger 
Bacon, or live a despised outcast all his days. 
Social position for the innovator, as for every- 
body else, is a function of proved and acknowl- 
edged power. 

HORACE M. KALLEN 

See: INVFNTION; CHANGE, SOCIAL; SOCIAL PROCESS; 
PROGRFSS; CONSLRV YTISM; TRADIIION; CONVENTIONS, 
SOCIAL; CUSIOM; FASHION; FICTIONS. 

Consult: Wallas, Graham, The Great Society (New 
York 1914) pt. n; Robinson, J. H , The Mind in the 
Making (New York 1921), Bagehot, Walter, Physics 
and Politics, International Scientific Series, vol. ii 
(London 1872) ch. in; Ogburn, W. ., Social Change 
(New York 1922); Mclver, R. M , Society: Its Struc- 
ture and Changes (New York 1931); Tarde, G. de, Les 
lots de 1'imitation (3rd ed. Paris 1900), tr. from 2nd 
French ed. by E. C. Parsons (New York 1903), James, 
William, "The Sentiment of Rationality" in his The 
Will to Believe (New York 1897) p. 63-1 10; Emerson, 
R. W., "The Conservative" m his Nature, Addresses, 
and Lectures, vol. i of the Complete Works (new ed. 
Boston 1903) p. 293-326, Dewey, John, The Public 
and Its Problems (New York 1927) p 57-62; Kallen, 
H. M , Culture and Democracy in the United States 
(New York 1924) ch iv, and Indecency and the Seven 
Arts (New York 1930), Ayres, C. E , Science, the False 
Messiah (Indianapolis 1927) ch. iv, Cardozo, Benjamin 
N , The Nature of the Judicial Process, Yale University, 
Storrs Lectures (New Haven 1921), especially lecture 
in; Stern, B. J , Social Factors in Medical Progress, 
Columbia University, Studies in History, Economics 
and Public Law, no. 287 (New York 1927). 

INQUISITION. The Inquisition was the of- 
fice of the mediaeval church for inquiry into 
heresy, which was commonly interpreted as ob- 
stinate adherence to opinions arbitrarily chosen 
in defiance of accepted ecclesiastical teaching and 
interpretation. It was an office not primarily of 
punishment but of examination and of instruc- 
tion, and it attempted to secure the abjuration of 
their errors by the heretics whom it discovered. 
To a logical churchman of the time it repre- 
sented the natural and merciful method of pre- 
venting the spread of doctrines which endan- 
gered the souls of all who heard as well as of all 
who communicated them. 

In the eleventh and twelfth centuries popular 
frenzy against those who professed unorthodox 
opinions resulted in indiscriminate burnings of 
the suspected; their protection as well as their 
proper examination became necessary. In the 
absence of clear understandings as to the re- 
spective parts which the secular and ecclesiastical 



62 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



authorities might play in the punishment of 
heretics the arrangements prevalent throughout 
Christendom were often the result of local agree- 
ments between the bishops and the king. In 1 184 
Lucius in and Frederick Barbarossa had ar- 
ranged that the bishops should make the inquiry 
for heresies and excommunicate the heretics and 
that the secular arm should enforce the imperial 
ban of exile and undertake the destruction of sus- 
pected houses. 

Decrees such as these were only spasmodically 
carried out, for as Catharism grew the problem 
became too general to be solved along local lines. 
The initial failure of Innocent in to convince the 
Albigensians by means of special missionaries, 
together with the crusade which in consequence 
he felt bound to undertake, made it clear that 
some more permanent prophylaxis was needed. 
This the normal canonical method of diocesan 
inquiry through the bishop was not strong 
enough to provide, since the bishop was a man of 
many duties and the task of discovering and 
examining heresy demanded both expert theo- 
logical knowledge and an organized system of 
delation through trustworthy informers. The 
latter was to a certain extent constructed by the 
decrees of the Council of Verona, 1184, which 
directed that bishops in making periodical cir- 
cuits of the dioceses for inquiries into heresy 
should compel trustworthy persons to denounce 
those who were diffamati for not living as good 
Catholics. The problem was how to secure the 
regular and effective body of witness of error, 
and for this task the ordinary church courts were 
just as inadequate as the special delegates sent 
by the papacy into disaffected areas. 

Gregory ix organized these spasmodic efforts 
into a regular system. Permanent judges delegate 
were instituted to cooperate with the bishops in 
their inquiries. They were given power in 1233 
to take action without appeal against all sus- 
pected persons and to call upon the secular arm 
to aid in their capture. The personnel of these 
judges came to be selected from the two mendi- 
cant orders . The preaching friars , or Dominicans , 
through the location of their early settlements 
and the personal character of their founder took 
the leading place in the new organization, but 
they divided their duties on a geographical 
basis with the Franciscans. Scandinavia was 
exempt from their activities and England, as will 
be shown, had no inquisitors other than the 
archbishops and their suffragans. Portugal did 
not receive the system till 1531. 

The most threatening fourteenth century her- 



esies prior to the spread of the doctrines of Wyc- 
liffe and Huss were the remains of Catharism in 
the south of France and the theories of the 
Waldensians, Beguines and pseudo-Apostles in 
northern Italy. In addition, the church was 
called upon to stamp out sorcery and witchcraft 
of various kinds and belief, such as that of Joan 
of Arc, in interior revelation from or communi- 
cation or understanding with supernatural 
powers. The later Middle Ages witnessed the 
growth of heresy in two main directions: doc- 
trines of internal illumination and extreme re- 
ligious subjectivism, which are frequently the 
product of mystical enthusiasm; and the kindred 
notions, that of the absolute poverty of Christ 
associated with the "spiritual" Franciscan^ 
and that of clerical possessions as depending for 
their justification on the personal goodness of 
the possessor. The latter notion was the applica- 
tion to the clergy, particularly the religious 
orders, of Wycliffe's doctrine that lordship is 
founded upon grace. To this the English Lol- 
lards and a large section of the unorthodox 
Bohemians added erroneous opinions on the 
sacrament of the Eucharist. But although sacra- 
mental heresy was serious it was not so dangerous 
as a false ecclcsiology, the main error which the 
later mediaeval church had to combat. 

The method of procedure for inquisitors has 
been described by the Dominican Bernard Gui 
in the fifth part of his Practica inqmsttionis here- 
ticae pravitatiS) written in the early fourteenth 
century. The citation of the suspected person was 
made in his own house through the parish priest 
in the presence of witnesses and again on a 
Sunday or in certain cases on three consecutive 
Sundays or festivals. If the suspected person did 
not come within a year, the citation having been 
repeated, he was pronounced excommunicate. 
The alternative method of citation was the more 
stringent one of summary capture upon clerical 
request by the secular power. The inquisitor 
then interrogated the prisoner in the presence of 
two religious and a notary who took minutes of 
the questions and replies. There was no Itbellus 
presented as in ordinary canonical procedure. 
The inquisitor was instructed to make his in- 
quiry simply and directly (de piano) and his 
powers were not subject to the territorial limits 
laid down in the thirty-seventh canon of the 
Fourth Lateran Council of 1215. No exemptions 
or appeals were permitted. Culpability was de- 
termined either by the confession of the victim 
under examination or by the evidence of wit- 
nesses, who for this purpose need not necessarily 



Inquisition 



be persons of unblemished character. Their dep- 
ositions were communicated to the accused, but 
their names were kept secret and he was never 
confronted with them. Generally the inquisitor 
aimed at securing a personal confession, which 
might be effected by persuasion, accompanied 
where necessary by judiciously prolonged deten- 
tion in prison. 

In certain more obstinate cases the confession 
might be elicited by torture, as sanctioned by the 
bull Ad exstirpanda of Innocent iv. The period 
when torture seems to have been most employed 
is the fifteenth century in the great campaigns 
against witchcraft undertaken in southern Ger- 
many and in the district of Arras. The bull of 
Innocent vin Summis desider antes (1484) shows 
thai a reaction had been taking place in the upper 
Rhineland against the rigorous method of the 
inquisitors. In 1522 the humanist J. L. Vives in 
his edition of the De civitate Dei, when com- 
menting upon the ninth book, speaks of the 
evils of torture, which men preferred to death. 

The sentence required the cooperation of the 
ecclesiastical ordinary and was generally given. 
in an assembly of secular and religious clergy 
reenforced by lawyers. It could always be re- 
voked or modified except where the accused was 
left to the secular arm for death by burning; and 
even here repentance in extremis, provided that 
the accused was prepared to abjure sincerely and 
denounce his errors and former accomplices, 
would justify the lay court in returning him to 
the inquisitor, in which case his punishment 
would be perpetual imprisonment. The penalty 
of the stake could not, however, be mitigated in 
the case of a relapsed heretic, although he was 
allowed to receive the sacraments of penance and 
the Eucharist if he was converted at the end. 

In the case of others the penalty might be im- 
prisonment either in more or less open confines 
(murus largu*) or else in rigorous and solitary im- 
prisonment (murus strictus)\ the wearing of a 
distinct mark upon the dress to indicate the 
brand of heresy; or pilgrimages to the greater or 
smaller shrines of Christendom. In the last 
case annual visits were often prescribed and the 
penitent was enjoined to hear mass and sermon 
in the church which he was compelled to visit 
and to offer a candle to the celebrating priest, by 
whom he was solemnly fustigated before pro- 
claiming his offenses aloud to the assembled 
congregation. In other instances pecuniary pen- 
alties were inflicted. In Languedoc severe cases 
frequently involved confiscation of goods and the 
destruction of the heretic's dwelling. Of the 



property so confiscated part went to the ruler, 
part to the church. These confiscations consti- 
tuted one reason why the pursuit of heresy was 
to the advantage of the state; but in any case the 
secular authority never scrupled to put the 
heretic to death. The use of the stake was made 
general throughout the Germanic empire by 
Frederick n in 1238; it became customary in 
France under St. Louis. 

Although there was no inquisitor appointed by 
papal authority in England, the procedure, rest- 
ing in the first instance in the hands of the 
bishops, followed not dissimilar lines. The prac- 
tise as it developed after the papal condemnation 
of Wycliffe's heresy was that the bishop made 
inquiries and with the help of the secular arm, if 
necessary, seized and examined the suspected 
persons. Abjuration was made in the first in- 
stance before the bishop, who prescribed the 
penalty, frequently that of imprisonment. Par- 
ticularly bad cases, where the accused persons 
continued their errors after abjuration or where 
they were condemned for disseminating Lollard 
opinions by means of books and writings, might 
be referred to convocation. About 1400 and 
thereafter, probably as a result of the deter- 
mined influence of Archbishop Arundel, all the 
leading heretics were brought by their diocesans 
to the provincial synod. According to the proce- 
dure governing such cases articles were first 
"objected" to the defendant and his replies 
noted; after this there followed an examination 
conducted by a tribunal consisting of the arch- 
bishop and members of each of the mendicant 
orders representing theological interests and of 
trained lawyers representing legal interests; at 
the end there was rehearsal of the points es- 
tablished and an exhortation by the archbishop 
to the accused person to abjure. In the event of 
abjuration the penalty was fixed by the arch- 
bishop in convocation and generally took the 
form of a public recantation of error and of im- 
prisonment until the heretic could find sufficient 
security for his good behavior. In cases of obsti- 
nate persistence convocation relinquished the 
accused to the secular arm. The state bound it- 
self to assist the church in its pursuit of Lollardry 
both by putting the heretic to death (statute De 
hcretico comburcndo of 1401) and by cooperating 
through its local officials in the inquiry for 
heretics (statute of Leicester, 1414) In a serious 
case involving a man of high standing, like Sir 
John Oldcastle, the king himself tried to exercise 
his influence. 

The sinister reputation acquired by the Holy 



6 4 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



Office was probably due to the great powers given 
to the inquisitor, by the subtle distinctions em- 
ployed in grading the suspected person and by 
the actual horror of the burnings. But it must be 
remembered that the inquisitor was frequently 
assisted by viri periti, lawyers who could keep a 
watch upon proceedings and who would cer- 
tainly prevent serious injustice being done. 
Furthermore there is reason to believe that the 
number of relaxations to the secular arm was not 
great. The destruction of the suspect was by no 
means the purpose of the tribunal. The church 
did not desire the death of the sinner, and the 
inquisitor's object was to instruct and convince 
those in error of the truth of its doctrines. Less 
favorable interpretations derive largely from the 
rigorous conduct of individual inquisitors, like 
Conrad of Marburg and Conrad Tors in Ger- 
many or Torquemada and Lucero in Spain. In 
sixteenth century Italy the Inquisition became 
notorious for the examinations to which it sub- 
jected a number of illustrious men of science and 
letters. By this time, however, its main work in 
the suppression of heresy was done. 

The adaptability of inquisition procedure to 
political ends was first revealed in the program of 
Philippe le Bel and his shrewd legist, Guillaume 
de Nogaret, in fourteenth century France, and 
later by the popes in their attempts to consoli- 
date their temporal power in Italy. This adapta- 
tion was effected most thoroughly in Renais- 
sance Spain, where the Inquisition was organ- 
ized in close cooperation with the Spanish 
monarchy as a piece of state machinery, de- 
signed to exterminate antimonarchical groups, 
primarily Jews and Moors, and to establish both 
in Spain and throughout the Spanish empire in 
the New World a homogeneous population with 
a unified nationalistic outlook. The fact that 
these methods tended to contribute instead to 
the subsequent decline of Spanish enterprise 
may be attributed in part to the extreme severity 
with which they were applied at home and in the 
colonies. 

E. F. JACOB 

See: CHRISTIANITY; APOSTASY AND HERESY; INTOLER- 
ANCE; PERSECUTION; EXCOMMUNICAIION; PILGRIM- 
AGES. 

Consult. Gui, Bernard, Practica inquisttionis hereticae 
pravitatis, ed. by C. Douais (Pans 1886), pt. v ed. 
with a French translation by G. Mollat and G. Drioux 
as Manuel de I'inquisiteur, 2 vols. (Pans 1926-27); 
Lea, H. C., A History of the Inquisition of the Middle 
Ages, 3 vols. (New York 1887-88), A History of the 
Inquisition of Spain, 4 vols. (New York 1906-07), and 
A History of the Inquisition in the Spanish Depend- 



encies (New York 1908), Corpus documentorum inqui- 
sitionis hereticae pravitatis neerlandicae, ed. by P. 
Fre"de>icq, 5 vols. (Ghent 1889-1906); Tanon, L., 
Histoire des tribunaux de V inquisition en France (Paris 
1893); Hansen, J., Zauberwahn, Inquisition undHexen- 
prozess im Mittelalter (Munich 1900); Langlois, C. V., 
"L'mquisition" in Grand revue, vol. iii (1901) 57391, 
and vol. iv (1901) 68-89 and 42854; Douais, C , 
L' inquisition: ses orttftnes, sa procedure (Paris 1901); 
Schmidt, Richard, Komgsrecht, Kirchenrecht und 
Stadtrecht beim Aufbau des Inquisitionsprosesses (Mu- 
nich 1915); Guiraud, Jean, L'inquisition medievale 
(Paris 1928), tr. by E. C. Messenger (London 1929); 
Coulton, G. G M The Inquisition (New York 1929); 
Verrill, A. II., The Inquisition (London 1931). 

INSANITY 

CRIMINAL LAW. In criminal cases the problem 
of insanity must be considered in three respects: 
first, as to the capacity of an accused person to be 
tried; second, as to the sanity of an accused per- 
son at the time of his offense; third, as to the 
procedure following acquittal on the ground of 
insanity. 

The legal problem of insanity before or during 
trial does not involve the issue of responsibility 
or irresponsibility, which is based on the condi- 
tion of the accused at the time of the offense, but 
so-called present insanity, i.e. mental incapacity 
for trial. Under early English law as in modern 
Anglo-American a man who becomes insane be- 
fore arraignment or during trial is not obliged to 
plead to the offense or to stand trial provided he 
meets certain criteria, such as that he has, not 
such "mind and discretion" as would enable him 
to appreciate the charge against him and the pro- 
ceedings thereon or that he is not sane enough to 
recall the events of his life and to present to 
counsel the facts which ought to be stated to the 
jury. At common law the question of capacity to 
be tried was customarily settled by a separate 
jury, occasionally by personal inspection by the 
judge. Today the method for determining the 
condition of the accused before or after indict- 
ment or during trial varies. In some American 
states the court has discretion as to the means of 
inquiry, in others lunacy proceedings in chan- 
cery must be instituted; in some a jury trial is 
necessary, in others there is inquiry by two or 
more qualified physicians or by a commission of 
doctors and lawyers. 

The chief weaknesses of these provisions are 
that since the initiation of the proceedings is left 
to persons untrained in psychiatry it becomes 
largely a matter of chance whether the defend- 
ant will be examined mentally before or during 
trial, unless his symptoms are striking, and that 
when an examination does take place it is not 



Inquisition Insanity 



always made by skilled experts. In Massachu- 
setts under a unique provision of a law of 1921 
(as variously amended in minor details) this 
situation has been remedied. A psychiatric ex- 
amination by experts of the Department of 
Mental Diseases is a routine provision for all 
persons indicted for a felony who have been 
previously convicted of a felony or indicted for 
any other offense more than once. The objects 
of the examination are to determine the mental 
condition of the accused at the time of the 
examination and "the existence of any mental 
disease or defect which would affect . . . criminal 
responsibility." The report of such examination 
is not admissible as evidence in a case that goes 
to trial, and each side may still call its own ex- 
pef ts; but in practise the neutral nature of the 
examination is relied upon to a considerable ex- 
tent by courts, prosecutors and defense counsel, 
and "battles of experts," which so often mar the 
procedure in other jurisdictions, have in Massa- 
chusetts become practically unknown. 

The most important aspect of the law of 
criminal insanity relates to the conditions under 
which the mentally ill are exempt from criminal 
responsibility. Some attempts to define these 
conditions were made as far back as the time of 
the Roman law as a result of the influence of the 
Greek physicians. A rescript cited in the Digest 
of Justinian (Dig. i, 18, 14) dealt with the prob- 
lem. The rescript states that the insane are irre- 
sponsible because they have been punished 
enough through their infirmity, that persons who 
are mentally ill may have "lucid intervals," that 
lack of knowledge of what one is doing may be a 
criterion of irresponsible insanity. Even the 
Germanic law sources of the Middle Ages, as is 
apparent from the various mirrors, town laws and 
custumals, recognized the criminal irresponsibil- 
ity of the insane. The Romanistic writers re- 
introduced the idea of the lucid interval, but 
Farinacius states that the majority of them in- 
dulged a presumption that the offense was com- 
mitted during the ordinary state of insanity. 

Among English legal commentators Bracton, 
Fitzherbert, Staunderforde, Coke, Hale and 
Hawkins attempted in various ways to evolve 
precise tests of irresponsibility. These, however, 
hardly amount to more than scraps of opinion. 
The Roman influence is particularly marked in 
Bracton. In Rex*;. Arnold (16 How. St.Tr., 695), 
decided in 1724, a remark of Bracton's that an 
insane person is non multum distat a brutis 
turned up as the "wild beast test"; in Hadfield's 
Case (27 How. St. Tr., 1281), decided in 1800, 



the brilliant advocate Erskine disposed of the 
views of Coke and Hale in insisting that "delu- 
sion, where there is no frenzy or raving madness, 
is the true character of insanity." 

The modern English law rests upon the fa- 
mous M'Naghten Case (10 Clark & Fin., 200), 
decided in 1843, in which the rules of responsi- 
bility were crystallized in the well known answers 
of the judges of England to certain questions 
propounded by the House of Lords as the result 
of an unpopular acquittal of M'Naghten, a 
paranoiac who killed Sir Robert Peel's secre- 
tary. The judges said that "to establish a defence 
on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly 
proved that, at the time of the committing of the 
act, the party accused was labouring under such 
a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as 
not to know the nature and quality of the act he 
was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not 
know he was doing what was wrong." This 
simple sounding "test" has in practise led to 
great confusion and difficulty of application; al- 
most every phrase in the classic judicial utterance 
has been subjected to criticism from both a legal 
and a psychiatric point of view. The same is true 
of the further opinion of the judges in this case 
that a person who suffered from delusion might 
be liable to punishment if he knew that he was 
acting contrary to law. 

Most American courts refuse to consider any 
criterion of the irresponsibility of the insane 
other than some local variation of the "nature- 
and-quality" or "right-and-wrong" test. In a 
number of jurisdictions, however, under the 
influence of both legal theory and medical at- 
tacks it has been held that irresponsibility may 
under certain conditions result from the pres- 
ence of an "insane, irresistible impulse" even 
though knowledge of the nature and quality and 
wrongfulness of an act exists. The tests have 
been further complicated by the introduction in 
some American decisions of the element of de- 
lusion and its effect upon responsibility. The 
New Hampshire law expresses the doctrine that 
the question of irresponsibility by reason of in- 
sanity is altogether one of fact for the jury, since 
there is in truth no particular legal test which 
they must observe. Reviewing all the "symp- 
toms, phases, or manifestations, of mental dis- 
ease as legal tests of capacity to entertain a 
criminal intent," Judge Ladd in a well known 
case [State v. Jones, 50 N. H., 369, 398, 399 
(1871)] concluded that "they are all clearly 
matters of evidence, to be weighed by the 
jury " 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



66 

In criticizing the tests of insanity it must be 
remembered that it has never been held that the 
mere existence of mental disease or defect in it- 
self constitutes an exemption from criminal re- 
sponsibility. One reason for this view is, as 
Kenny has said, that "lunatics are usually ca- 
pable of being influenced by ordinary motives, 
such as the prospect of punishment; hence they 
usually plan their crimes with care, and take 
means to avoid detection" (Outlines of Criminal 
Law, p. 52). Nevertheless, a historical review of 
the subject indicates that the tests themselves, 
while remaining unchanged theoretically, have 
in practise gradually undergone modification not 
only to meet changing attitudes toward the ob- 
jectives of punishment but to take account of re- 
finements in medical knowledge. 

The standard tests today proceed more or less 
upon the following assumptions, which are from 
the viewpoint of psychiatry questionable: first, 
that lack of knowledge of the "nature or quality" 
of an act (assuming the meaning of such terms 
to be clearly defined in the minds of juries and in 
judicial opinions), or incapacity to know right 
from wrong, is the sole or even the most im- 
portant symptom of mental disorder; second, 
that such knowledge is the sole instigator and 
guide of conduct or at least the most important 
element therein and consequently should be the 
only criterion of responsibility when insanity is 
involved; and, third, that the capacity of know- 
ing right from wrong can be completely intact 
and functioning perfectly even though a defend- 
ant is otherwise demonstrably of disordered 
mind. 

The irresistible impulse test supplies in a 
measure the deficiencies of the knowledge tests; 
for it takes into account disturbances in the voli- 
tional inhibitory mode of mental life. It recog- 
nizes that although the disorder in the cognitive 
sphere may not be such as to prevent a defendant 
from having had some conception of the dif- 
ference between right and wrong, he may never- 
theless have been suffering from a deep seated 
mental disturbance which markedly affected his 
conduct. Emphasis of delusion as a test may be 
criticized in that it represents a singling out 
of but one symptom from a general disease pat- 
tern in the delusional mental disorders, a 
symptom which is not necessarily more impor- 
tant than the others. 

All three concepts knowledge, irresistible 
impulse and delusion are subject to criticism 
as tests of irresponsibility because their employ- 
ment neglects the fundamental theory of the 



interdependence and interrelationship of mental 
processes; a disturbance in the cognitive, voli- 
tional or emotional sphere can hardly occur 
without affecting the personality as a whole and 
the conduct that flows from the personality. It 
could readily be shown that these outworn pre- 
suppositions may work injustice to offenders of 
various types of mental disorder, particularly 
those suffering from pronounced psychoneu- 
roses, in whom unconscious motivation of con- 
duct is believed to play a predominant role. 

Several attempts have been made to remedy 
the situation. A distinguished legal and medical 
committee of the American Institute of Criminal 
Law and Criminology recommended in 1913 a 
test that was not really a test at all, for it was to 
the effect that no one should be held liable f6r a 
criminal act if his state of mind was such that he 
could not have had the necessary criminal intent 
a proposition that is not of much practical 
value to a judge in charging a jury. A better at- 
tempt to overcome the dilemmas inherent in 
existing tests of irresponsibility was the earlier 
proposal of a committee of the New York State 
Bar Association, which in 1910 moved to abolish 
insanity as a defense to a charge of crime. This 
endeavor to eliminate the technicalities of the 
tests of irresponsibility at one stroke was ac- 
companied by a provision that the court, if it 
believed the prisoner was insane or mentally de- 
fective at the time of the offense, might have an 
inquiry made and as the result thereof either 
impose the regular penalty or sentence him 
to confinement in an asylum for a term of years 
or life. Thus the effort was made to have the 
question of mental disorder considered, as cer- 
tain criminologists feel it should be, not as a 
matter for the jury in its deliberations as to guilt 
or innocence but as a matter for the court aided 
by impartial experts in its deliberations as to 
sentence; this was essentially the principle be- 
hind a Washington statute which, not without 
room for doubt, was declared unconstitutional in 
Strasburg v. State [60 Washington, 106 (1910)] 
and a somewhat similar provision more recently 
invalidated in Mississippi [Sinclair v. State, 132 
So., 581 (1931)]. 

While not much progress has been made with 
tests of insanity, it must be remembered that the 
consequences of conviction or acquittal on the 
ground of irresponsibility have in recent years 
been considerably modified in many jursi dic- 
tions. On the one hand, conviction today is not 
always or even often followed by the death pen- 
alty; on the other hand, acquittal frequently re- 



Insanity 



suits in the defendant's commitment to a hospi- 
tal for mental diseases instead of his release. 

In the earliest English law insanity seerns not 
to have operated as an acquittal, at least in 
murder, but to have resulted in a special verdict 
entitling the accused to a pardon. Subsequently 
in England and in a number of American juris- 
dictions if the accused was found irresponsible 
because of insanity he was not only acquitted but 
apparently no special order looking to his safety 
or to that of society was made. Under the English 
Criminal Lunatics Act of 1 800 such a defendant 
was detained "during his Majesty's pleasure." 
In 1883 the Trial of Lunatics Act provided that 
upon an acquittal on the ground of insanity the 
jur^ should return a special verdict of "guilty, 
but insane," under which the acquitted person 
could be legally controlled by the home secre- 
tary. Under the Criminal Appeal Act of 1907 the 
Court of Criminal Appeal was empowered to 
quash the sentence of an appellant found guilty 
who was, however, in its opinion insane and to 
order the appellant to be confined as a "lunatic," 
as if a special verdict had been found under the 
1883 act. The defendant is not released until the 
home secretary so decides. 

In America practise varies. In one group of 
states the jury that acquits the defendant because 
of insane irresponsibility must state in one way 
or another whether it still regards him as insane; 
in other jurisdictions the jury must state whether 
it finds the defendant to be still dangerous; in 
several states the mental condition of the de- 
fendant at time of acquittal is determined by 
separate machinery. 

The consequences of such findings vary. In a 
few states if the jury finds the defendant no 
longer insane or dangerous he is allowed to go 
free; in others when a jury acquits a person on 
the ground of insanity the statutes allow the trial 
court no discretion but to provide for his com- 
mitment with or without separate lunacy pro- 
ceedings; in many states the court may, if it 
deems such a defendant dangerous, commit him 
to a hospital; in Massachusetts the court must 
order a defendant acquitted of murder or man- 
slaughter because of insanity to be committed to 
a mental hospital "during his natural life." 

A frequent remedy for release of persons in- 
carcerated on the ground of irresponsibility is 
habeas corpus. The writ is used for this purpose 
in about a fourth of the states, while in the re- 
mainder special machinery for release is also 
provided. Whether the hearing on the return of 
the writ shall be with or without a jury also 



varies from state to state; in some this matter is 
within the judge's discretion, in others within 
the petitioner's. In various states discharge from 
the hospital is within the discretion of the super- 
intendent, commissioners of insanity, depart- 
ment of correction, trustees, special commission 
or a justice of the supreme court. In addition 
there exist of course the general provisions for 
commutation and pardon. 

In recent years there has been an increasing 
demand for radical reorganization of the ma- 
chinery of criminal justice. A plan has been 
frequently urged sharply to differentiate and 
specialize the two major processes of criminal 
justice ascertainment of guilt and imposition of 
sentence. The decision as to the sentence, that is, 
the treatment of the offender found guilty, 
would in such a scheme be made by a tribunal 
specially qualified in the interpretation and 
evaluation of psychiatric, psychologic and 
sociologic data. The treatment originally im- 
posed would be modifiable from time to time in 
the light of scientific reports of progress or retro- 
gression of the offender. Certain procedural safe- 
guards would protect him from possible arbi- 
trary action on the part of the tribunal. A com- 
pletely indeterminate sentence law, or at least 
one giving the tribunal wide administrative dis- 
cretion as to the duration of the sentence, is an 
indispensable adjunct to such a system, as is also 
a scientifically manned clearing house and 
laboratory where offenders awaiting sentence 
would be given thorough observation and study. 
Finally, for the system to operate efficiently a 
thorough overhauling of existing treatment 
practises probation, various forms of imprison- 
ment, parole would be necessary and there 
would have to be continuous experiments with 
new correctional and educative instruments. 
The result of this outlined system would be 
practically to eliminate the need of the cumber- 
some and unscientific defense of insanity, since 
the offender would as a matter of routine pro- 
cedure be assured appropriate treatment regard- 
less of whether or not the defense was resorted 
to. The clumsy device built up by the law for 
taking mental pathology into account in the de- 
termination of criminal responsibility would 
gradually become atrophied. 

The continental law and practise with regard 
to criminal insanity are not significantly differ- 
ent from the Anglo-American. According to the 
German criminal code of 1871, "there is no 
punishable act, if at the time of its commission 
the actor was in a state of unconsciousness or of 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



68 



marked disturbance of the mental faculties which 
excluded the free determination of his will." 
The French penal code of 1810 stipulates that 
"there is neither crime nor offense if the accused 
was in a state of mental alienation at the time of 
doing the act, or if he was constrained by a 
force which he could not resist." Generally 
the European codes take account of both the 
cognitive and the volitional elements in be- 
havior and are broad enough to allow the trier of 
fact considerable scope for introducing "the 
human element in justice" in cases in which 
popular sympathy is with the accused. While the 
continental tests are subject to some of the same 
criticisms as Anglo-American tests, it should be 
noticed that the business of securing expert 
testimony is generally managed more rationally 
in European courts. Some European codes pro- 
vide for "partial responsibility" and correspond- 
ing mitigation of punishment, but this is not 
true of the German or the French code. It is 
doubtless, however, possible for partial respon- 
sibility to be taken into account as an "extenuat- 
ing circumstance." Most European codes also 
provide for measures of security against a person 
acquitted on the ground of insanity, but the 
provisions vary considerably. 

SHELDON GLUECK 

CIVIL LAW. In the civil law as in the criminal 
law mental incompetency of an individual 
leads to the extinction or diminution of his 
legal capacity to act and of his legal responsi- 
bility for his acts. The protection given the men- 
tally incompetent in modern systems of law is 
limited by the protection accorded innocent per- 
sons who deal with him, hence the emphasis is 
placed upon preventive measures such as guard- 
ianship. The primitive superstition that the in- 
sane person was accursed by the gods or seized 
by evil spirits left no trace upon Roman private 
law, which as early as the Twelve Tables desig- 
nated a familial curator for thefuriosus, a lunatic 
who might or might not have lucid intervals, and 
an officially appointed guardian for other mental 
incompetents (mente capti^ insani). The Roman 
law system has been adapted in modern Euro- 
pean codes to a wider range of mental incompe- 
tency. Thus Germany and Switzerland have ex- 
tended guardianship not only to prodigality, 
which was recognized in Roman law, but also 
to dipsomania and mental weakness, and the 
French civil code authorizes in case of prodigality 
or mental weakness the appointment of a judi- 
cial counselor whose consent is necessary to the 



validity of certain types of transactions. A simi- 
lar expansion of the concept of civil insanity as a 
ground for the appointment of a guardian has oc- 
curred in many Anglo-American jurisdictions, 
which by statute or judicial construction author- 
ize the appointment of a guardian for a spend- 
thrift, a habitual drunkard or even for a person 
likely to be imposed upon. Drug addicts are also 
frequently included. California and England are 
among the jurisdictions which have apparently 
gone furthest in this respect, while New York 
adheres more nearly to the narrower conception 
of early English law. In the latter system the 
king's prerogative of acting as guardian of the 
person and property of the mentally incompe- 
tent, however mercenary in its origin, came to 
be based upon the humanitarian conception that 
the king was parens patriae. To the lord chan- 
cellor was delegated at an early date the royal 
power to appoint guardians, and this function 
thus became a part of the jurisdiction of the 
Court of Chancery. In the United States courts 
of equity jurisdiction, adapting the powers of the 
English court, have ordinarily taken over this 
function, although by statute it has sometimes 
been conferred upon probate courts which have 
jurisdiction of decedents' estates. 

While English and American judicial reports 
deal with many varieties of mental abnormality, 
legal tests of sanity do not conform to standards 
recognized by abnormal psychologists with 
educational or clinical objectives in view. The 
law has striven to establish flexible standards of 
incompetency. To deprive a man of his civil 
capacity or to relieve him of his civil responsibil- 
ity to others calls for a more pronounced degree 
of mental abnormality (to say nothing of differ- 
ences in type) than is requisite where the deci- 
sion involves only specialized educational or 
clinical treatment. Other factors which have 
tended to maintain a relatively low legal stand- 
ard of sanity are the emphasis upon freedom of 
alienation, judicial acceptance of the theory that 
mental faculties operate independently of one 
another and trial by jury. The frequency with 
which decisions of lower courts are reversed on 
appeal indicates the uncertainty of the legal 
standard. 

Legal proceedings involving a determination 
of mental incompetency may be grouped into 
two main classes: preventive and restitutive. In 
the first group the issue is the competency of the 
individual for future conduct; in the second it is 
competency for a particular act already consum- 
mated, such as a conveyance, contract, will or 



Insanity 



tort. In the former belongs the statutory pro- 
ceeding to commit an insane person to a public 
or private institution for treatment and for con- 
finement in the interests of the individual as well 
as of his relatives and the public. Although it 
resembles a criminal prosecution it is usually 
denominated a civil proceeding. 

No person may be permanently restrained 
against his will except by due process of law. 
The safeguards of ordinary contentious litiga- 
tion, designed for mentally competent litigants, 
are here inadequate; hence other safeguards are 
provided. The class of persons who may petition 
for commitment is restricted to near relatives or 
a public official, and in many jurisdictions the 
petition must be accompanied by the certificates 
of two qualified physicians. Notice must be giv- 
en to the person alleged to be insane or to his 
near relatives, and a hearing is required. While 
trial by jury is not constitutionally requisite, in 
some states it may be demanded as of right and 
in others it is discretionary. Since propensity to 
do injury is the test in such proceedings, com- 
mitment does not preclude a finding that the in- 
dividual remains competent for business trans- 
actions. 

The other type of preventive proceeding is the 
appointment of a guardian (also called a commit- 
tee, conservator or the like) of the property and 
person of an insane person. The test of sanity as 
.usuaHy formulated is a person's competency to 
manage himself or his affairs. The law thus 
emphasizes the intellectual process rather than 
the emotional basis of conduct. Yet in some 
jurisdictions the concept of incompetency is 
broad enough to include the emotional instability 
of old age and extreme susceptibility to imposi- 
tion in business dealings. Lack of ordinary busi- 
ness judgment is not incompetency. The courts 
have felt that the denial of contractual freedom to 
a large portion of the adult population would 
seriously hamper economic intercourse. While 
guardianship of the person alone is still permis- 
sible, the proceeding is seldom resorted to 
where no property is at stake. The procedural 
safeguards in proceedings for the appointment 
of a guardian are much the same as in commit- 
ment proceedings, save that a jury trial is more 
commonly required. Unlike the Roman law, 
which effaced the juristic personality of an in- 
competent under guardianship (save during a 
lucid interval), American law limits the in- 
capacity created by a judicial determination of 
insanity. The older doctrine that the contracts, 
conveyances and transactions of an incompetent 



under guardianship were absolutely void has 
been shaken by more recent decisions holding 
that the appointment of a guardian merely raises 
a presumption of insanity, which may be re- 
butted by proving restoration of sanity and prac- 
tical cessation of the guardianship. Notice of the 
guardianship is imputed to all persons dealing 
with the lunatic on the theory that the proceed- 
ing is one in rem. 

The validity of a contract, conveyance, gift or 
other transaction may be questioned in a suit or 
by way of defense by the incompetent or his 
guardian or after his death by his heirs or repre- 
sentatives to set aside the transaction and obtain 
restitution of the status quo. Such a suit or de- 
fense may be maintained even though no prior 
adjudication of insanity has taken place. The 
test of competency is ability to understand the 
nature and consequences of the particular trans- 
action at the time when it took place. The resti- 
tutive adjudication may seriously impair the in- 
terests of third parties, and the reported deci- 
sions show a tendency to apply a lower standard 
than would be applied in a guardianship inquisi- 
tion. The policy of maintaining freedom of 
alienation excludes in most jurisdictions the 
mental weakness of old age and delusions on sub- 
jects not connected with the particular transac- 
tion. Transactions during a lucid interval are 
upheld, even though the individual has been 
confined to an asylum or has been suffering from 
delusions on unrelated subjects. Some courts, 
however, have set aside transfers of property be- 
cause motivated by insane delusions, such as de- 
lusions of persecution [Riggs v. American Tract 
Society, 95 N. Y. 503 (1884)], thus shifting the 
emphasis from the intellectual to the emotional 
basis. 

In most American jurisdictions transactions of 
insane persons are treated as "voidable" rather 
than "void." The legal consequences of this 
doctrine are that restitution of benefits received 
by the lunatic (or at least of those retained by 
him) is a prerequisite of his regaining that which 
he parted with, that innocent purchasers from 
the donee or the vendee are fully protected, that 
ratification after restoration to sanity validates 
the transaction and that the suit to regain land is 
tried in a juryless equity court. While very few 
American courts have gone as far as the more 
recent English decisions in enforcing the trans- 
actions of an incompetent in favor of a person 
who deals directly with him in actual ignorance 
of the insanity, the requirement of restitution 
often attains the same result by indirection. The 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



70 

low standard of competency, excluding mental 
weakness or old age, is eked out by the Anglo- 
American doctrine of "undue influence," which 
permits cancellation of a conveyance or gift by a 
weak minded person to a domineering relative or 
confidant who by deception, threat or insistent 
suggestion knowingly took advantage of the 
other's weakness. Many of the undue influence 
cases involve controversies over the effects of 
senile dementia [McGregor v. Keun, 330 111. 
106, 161 N. E. 99 (1928)]. 

Competency to execute a will may be deter- 
mined in a contest over the probate of the will, 
in which trial by jury is the rule. The standard 
of competency is even lower than in transactions 
inter vivos because of the policy of upholding 
testamentary dispositions, especially where 
those persons are favored whom the court or 
jury regards as the natural objects of the testa- 
tor's bounty. Some courts avowedly test the 
rationality of the testator partly by reference to 
the rationality of his testament. The mores of a 
testator's duties to his relatives thus exert influ- 
ence under this guise. 

An insane person, even one previously adjudi- 
cated to be incompetent, is civilly liable for his 
tortious injuries to the person or property of 
others. Although English law balks at imposing 
liability on one who did not understand the na- 
ture of his act, American courts award compen- 
sation to the injured person, partly in order to 
induce the lunatic's relatives to confine him 
and partly in order to discourage simulation. 
The ancient contention that the lunatic has no 
will ("Furiosi . . . nulla voluntas est," Dig. 
L, 17, 40) has not sufficed to protect him from 
liability for some wilful torts, such as assault and 
battery or defamation (on which authorities are 
divided), but has precluded liability for malicious 
prosecution and for punitive damages in any 
event. An insane person although not bound by 
his contracts is liable in quasi-contract to pay 
the reasonable value of necessaries furnished 
him, for without the ability to obtain credit he 
would be left destitute. 

Two standards of mental incompetency have 
struggled for recognition in the Anglo-American 
law of marriage. A marriage has been treated as 
the making of a civil bargain which can be an- 
nulled only upon proof that one of the parties 
was then incapable of understanding the imme- 
diate incidents of the relation; hence such ail- 
ments as feeblemindedness, epilepsy, klepto- 
mania and delusions are generally not grounds 
for annulment. Yet the eugenic standard of com- 



petency has steadily gained recognition through 
legislation prohibiting the marriage of epileptics 
and others who though capable of understand- 
ing the legal consequences of a marriage are un- 
fitted for its biological and social functions. The 
new standard is also recognized in judicial deci- 
sions [Gould v. Gould, 78 Conn. 242 (1905)] 
decreeing annulment or divorce on the authority 
of these statutes, although many of them are so 
loosely drafted as to be ineffective. Supervening 
insanity prolonged and incurable is a ground for 
divorce in a growing minority of American 
states: Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, 
Kansas, Minnesota, Nevada, North Dakota, 
Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont and 
Washington. Mental incompetency is also a dis- 
qualification for the acquisition of citizenship, 
for voting, for jury service and for holding public 
office. 

EDWIN W. PATTERSON 

See: CRIMINAL LAW; CRIMINOLOGY; PRISON REFORM; 
HOMICIDE; INTENT, CRIMINAL; PUNISHMENT; GUARD- 
IANSHIP; ALIENIST; EXPERT TESTIMONY; PSYCHIATRY; 
MENTAL DISEASES. 

Consult: FOR CRIMINAL LAW: Stephen, J. F , A History 
of the Criminal Law of England, 3 voh (London 1883) 
vol ii, ch. xix, Oppenheimer, II., The Criminal Re- 
sponsibility of Lunatics (London 1909); Kenny, C. S., 
Outlines of Criminal Law (i3th ed Cambridge, Eng. 
1929) p. 51-60; Glueck, S., Mental Disorder and the 
Criminal Law (Boston 1925), "Psychiatric Examina- 
tion of Persons Accused of Crime" in Yalv Law* 
Journal, vol. xxxvi (1926-27) 632-48, "A Tentative 
Program of Cooperation between Psychiatrists and 
Lawyers" m Mental Hygiene, vol. ix (1925) 686-98, 
"Principles of a Rational Penal Code" in Harvard Law 
Review, vol. xli (1927-28) 453-82, and "Significant 
Transformations in the Administration of Criminal 
Justice" in Mental Hygiene, vol. xiv (1930) 280-306; 
Cardozo, Benjamin, "What Medicine Can Do for 
Law" in New York Academy of Medicine, Bulletin, 
vol. v (1929) 581-607; New York State, Crime Com- 
mission, Special Report on Psychiatric and Expert 
Testimony in Criminal Cases (Albany 1930); Over- 
holser, W., "The R61e of Psychiatry in the Adminis- 
tration of Criminal Justice" m Journal of the American 
Medical Association, vol. xciii (1929) 830-34, and 
"The Place of Psychiatry in the Administration of 
Criminal Law" in New England Journal of Medicine, 
vol. cci (1929) 479-84; Garraud, R., Precis de droit 
criminel (i4th ed. Paris 1926) p. 245-65; Mezger, 
Edmund, Strafrecht (Munich 1931) sects. 35-40; 
Kahl, Wilhelm, "Geminderte ZurechnungsfrihiKkeit" 
and Aschaffenburg, G., "Die Behandlung gemeinge- 
fahrlicher Geisteskranker und verbrecherischer Ge- 
wohnheitstrinker" in Vergleichende Darstellung des 
deutschen und auslandischen Strafrechts, Allgememer 
Teil, vol. i (Berlin 1908) p. 1-78. 

FOR CIVIL LAW: Singer, H. D., and Krohn, W. O., 
Insanity and Law (Philadelphia 1924); Theobald, H. 
S., The Law Relating to Lunacy (London 1924); Black, 



Insanity Inspection 



H. C., A Treatise on the Rescission of Contracts and 
Cancellation of Written Instruments, ed. by J. M. Lee, 
3 vols. (and ed. Kansas City, Mo. 1929) vol. ii; Cook, 
W. G. H., Insanity and Mental Deficiency in Relation to 
Legal Responsibility (London 1921); Girard, P. F., 
Manuel elementaire de droit romatn, ed. by Fe'hx Senn 
(8th ed. Paris 1929). 

INSPECTION. Inspection of commodities, 
buildings, industrial processes, trade practises 
and other phases of modern civilization by spe- 
cial employees of the government is merely one 
phase of law enforcement, conspicuous because 
governmental activity has penetrated into fields 
where common knowledge and chance report no 
longer furnish adequate information. In the col- 
lection of revenues, in which governments are al- 
ways vitally interested, inspectors of a sort have 
been employed for as many centuries as customs, 
tolls, tributes and taxes have been exacted. In- 
spection and other aspects of enforcement are 
not in fact separable, for although in some in- 
stances inspectors merely publish their findings 
and the publicity itself acts as a corrective to il- 
legal or undesirable practises, in others they are 
charged with the double duty of reporting in- 
fractions of the law and of bringing offenders to 
justice. 

Supervision of commodities and of market 
practises by civil authorities is as ancient as the 
records. It was undertaken in Egypt, China, 
Greece and Rome. Mediaeval town authorities 
and later the wardens of craft guilds made par- 
ticularly notable efforts to establish and uphold 
standards of quality, price and weight. The 
character of the supervision inquiry into the 
accuracy of weights and measures or insistence 
that the producer place his mark upon the wares 
as well as the severe punishments meted out 
to bakers whose bread was short in weight, to 
farmers who filled sacks with poor grain and 
sprinkled a little good grain at the top, to metal 
workers who used debased material in their 
wares, indicates the gravity of the offense of 
cheating. These regulations, like those of mod- 
ern chambers of commerce and better business 
bureaus, protected not only the consumer but 
the business of more reputable interests against 
encroachment from less reputable. And although 
this supervision may often have been thought of 
as a desirable restriction of trade, it is clear that 
it must sometimes have been considered con- 
structive promotion. Towns became important 
as trading centers; town officials would therefore 
wish to encourage legitimate trade. And as the 
records suggest that in proportion to the number 



71 

of sales cheating was extremely common, the 
mediaeval authorities met the situation by build- 
ing up a body of specific regulations. Only when 
makers and sellers discovered that greater satis- 
faction of consumers' wants meant increased 
business did the early supervision and inspec- 
tion by local authorities tend to become un- 
necessary and even troublesome. The growth in 
the volume of trade made the national govern- 
ments which emerged in the following centuries 
increasingly aware of their dependence upon a 
sound economic life. In both England and 
France there were movements to nationalize the 
regulations protecting the quality of commodi- 
ties, although the machinery for inspection re- 
mained local, exercised by wardens of crafts, 
clerks of the markets or special inspectors ap- 
pointed by local justices. In France, where 
failure to develop large shipping interests made 
for greater dependence upon small but stable 
markets, high standards of production were in- 
sisted upon much longer than in England, where 
constant access to new markets opened up by 
explorers and traders soon shifted the emphasis 
from quality to quantity. The laissez faire move- 
ment matured there as a protest against the mass 
of restrictions and regulations which penalized 
producers and traders and impeded the expan- 
sion of competition based on rapidly changing 
methods of production. In country after country 
government supervision, which was by tradition 
specific and hence in a changing society restric- 
tive, became less noticeably part of the economic 
life. But inspection was of course never com- 
pletely abandoned. Even in America, where 
production took its own course more freely than 
elsewhere, certain standards were always in- 
sisted upon. The Journal of the New York state 
assembly for 1828, for instance, contains annual 
reports (submitted in accordance with statute) 
from inspectors in the cities of New York and 
Albany of fish, flour, sole leather, staves and 
heading, liver oil, potash and pearlash and 
lumber. Four standard grades of pine boards are 
listed in the report. 

Now that quantity production has given rise 
to world wide competition for markets, uniform 
quality to insure liquidity has again become 
vital for the producing interests. Goods must be 
equally salable in Europe or South America, in 
six months' time or on twenty-four hours' no- 
tice. To a very great extent private interests in 
industry and commerce have brought about 
such uniformity as now exists the machine 
technology is indeed responsible for much of 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



it but here as elsewhere government has been 
pressed into service to control situations which 
private interest could not or would not supervise 
itself. Thus today there exist official inspection 
and grading of a wide variety of commodities for 
the domestic market or for export grains, 
fruits, vegetables, dairy products, meat, ice, silk 
and so on through a long list. In recent years 
governments have somewhat increased their 
supervision over the conditions of fair competi- 
tion through such organizations as the Federal 
Trade Commission in the United States. The 
use of unfair (substandard) marketing methods 
is discouraged not by systematic inspection but 
by special investigation of particular abuses in 
behalf of honest competitors, and legal proceed- 
ings are dropped against offenders who agree to 
desist. 

The increasing complications of industrial so- 
ciety have led to governmental regulation of less 
tangible commodities. National banks are sub- 
ject to inspection as part of the currency system; 
state banks and trust companies on the ground 
that they are of basic importance to the whole 
economic life. The extension of state activity to 
protect the savings of low income groups through 
supervision of savings bank investments, through 
regulation of building and loan associations and 
insurance companies and through the adminis- 
tration of blue sky laws is more definitely a 
limitation of private enterprise in the interest of 
certain classes of consumers. In the case of 
public utilities regulation of rates and services 
and of financial structure is justified on the legal 
ground that these industries are affected with a 
public interest. Supervision is accomplished by 
the requirement of standard accounting prac- 
tises and similar devices for minimizing the 
work of inspectors rather than by positive con- 
trol of operations. Logically, however, the sup- 
pression of fraud, the elimination of undue risk, 
the prohibition of undesirable trade practises 
and even such things as the age old supervision 
of weights and measures are simply necessary 
stages in the promotion of good business through 
the promotion of confidence. 

Police power in its broadest sense that is to 
say, the power of a state to act in the interests of 
the whole public and including, for example, the 
commerce power of the federal government of 
the United States provides in theory the neces- 
sary authority for many types of regulation. But 
the most conspicuous exercise of police power in 
the modern state has come about through activi- 
ties in behalf of public health, morals and safety. 



The suppression of crime and the use of special 
officers of inspection for that purpose need no 
specific mention. Supervision of public health 
and safety is more characteristic of the modern 
age. A series of government functions were in- 
itiated by the humanitarian protestants against 
the abuses of the industrial revolution. Limita- 
tions on child labor in factories began in England 
early in the century; the act of 1833 (3 and 4 
Will, iv, c. 103) stands out as the first factory 
legislation in any country to provide for national 
inspectors. On the continent governments inter- 
ested themselves first in conditions of work, in 
special industrial hazards presented by the use 
of machinery and steam boilers and in safety ap- 
pliances and only later in hours and wages of 
labor. Compulsory education and official interest 
in tenement house problems followed. Some 
pressure for housing reform in England came 
from overseers of the poor, but in regard to 
working conditions public opinion was only 
aroused to legislative action when strikes and 
drafts had called attention to the potential threat 
of poverty to the health and decency of the 
whole public. 

Health services and regulations have grown 
most rapidly since the turn of the present cen- 
tury. The ancient standards of sanitation and 
building construction had disappeared in the 
dark ages. And even before scientists knew how 
diseases could be transmitted through polluted 
water supplies, communities again became aware 
of the need for pure water and were active in 
supplying it. When fires swept away towns, 
building and safety regulations were instituted. 
Other reforms followed. Meat, milk, food and 
drug, seed and fertilizer inspection; plant 
quarantines; periodic water analysis; smoke and 
light tests; sanitary inspection of bakeries, food 
factories, beauty parlors, dwelling houses and 
industrial plants; supervision of the manufacture 
of biological preparations; health examinations 
of school children and immigrants; enforcement 
of minimum standards of light and air in schools, 
homes and places of work; regulation of the use 
of fire apparatus and safety devices; inspection of 
elevators, ships, motor vehicles, airplanes and 
other dangerous inventions, these are only a few 
of the services instituted by governments, central 
or local, in the interest of public health or public 
safety. No adequate explanation can be offered 
of why the complete list of government inspec- 
tion services includes the particular items which 
it does. Long as it is, it could obviously be much 
longer. The need for assistance in behalf of pub- 



lie safety is felt more acutely than other needs, 
perhaps because dangerous technological inven- 
tions are more visible than changes in the distri- 
bution of industrial and financial power. Yet 
even here it would be difficult to say whether 
supervision had kept pace with the increase of 
danger. Regulation in behalf of consumers may 
have been retarded because of opposition by 
special business interests, or because public 
opinion has been so steeped in the doctrine that 
the promotion of good business is the promotion 
of the general good that it has not thought to 
notice how the people were faring. A great 
variety of influences have been at work and no 
single formula can describe them. 

Growing up piecemeal, the administration of 
inspection services shows even more diversity 
than do the codes which they enforce. In every 
modern country there is some conflict of juris- 
diction between local and central authorities. 
Inspection services traditionally in the hands of 
local authorities sometimes remain there after 
state or national laws are passed. In Germany 
the standards created by factory acts are national 
but factory inspection is left to the states. In the 
United States the health and safety standards 
themselves differ from state to state. Convenience 
of administration is sometimes sacrificed to 
tradition in these matters. In certain fields, how- 
ever, as in building, the problem of control is es- 
sentially local, and city building and sanitary 
codes 'and inspection services frequently super- 
sede the less rigid state requirements. As inspec- 
tion grows more technical, division along func- 
tional lines is often made. Factory boiler inspec- 
tors cannot be charged with enforcement of the 
sanitary code, nor inspectors of electrical equip- 
ment with concern over the ages of child work- 
ers. Where inspection requires sampling and 
laboratory analysis, the field work may be in the 
hands of one group, technical work in those of 
another, while a third set of people concern them- 
selves with the legal processes involved in en- 
forcement. Different departments of a govern- 
ment may supervise precisely similar processes. 
The inspection in the United States of manufac- 
turing establishments preparing biological medi- 
cal materials for human consumption is the 
concern of the Public Health Service in the 
Treasury Department, and the inspection of 
such establishments preparing equivalent ma- 
terials for use in animal diseases is the concern of 
the Department of Agriculture. Factory inspec- 
tion in England is separate from mine inspection 
and from department store inspection, although 



Inspection 73 

hours of labor and working conditions are the 
concern of each. 

In effectiveness inspection services differ con- 
siderably. Even where statutes are relatively 
simple and specific and their enforcement some- 
what removed from political and commercial 
pressure, there may still be difficulty in securing 
adequate personnel. Civil servants in Europe 
enjoy a prestige which is largely lacking in the 
United States and in consequence European 
factory inspection has been of higher grade than 
American. On the other hand, European trade 
unions maintain that their interests would be 
better served if workers received some of the 
higher appointments now reserved for experts. 
Inspection can rarely be either continuous or 
complete. Accordingly it will be most effective 
when enforcing such codes as building regula- 
tions, where one visit can certify lasting com- 
pliance with the laws, or when applied to such 
commodities as grain, where the smallest 
sampling will be representative of the whole. It 
will be least effective where conditions are so 
fluid that they can be altered or concealed while 
inspection takes place, a factor which for a long 
time made industrial inspection powerless and 
which still impedes banking and utility supervi- 
sion. But even the most effective inspection may 
prove impotent when penalties for violation are 
incommensurate with the pecuniary gain. 

The problem of administrative standards is 
fundamental. A striking difference between 
contemporary state regulations and those of post- 
mediaeval days is the large measure of adminis- 
trative discretion now needed. Swift advances in 
knowledge of what constitutes purity in food or 
water or safety in transportation or construction 
make a large degree of elasticity in enforcement 
imperative. Furthermore modern legislators can 
seldom sift expert evidence sufficiently to be able 
to draft effective laws of the more specific type. 
Where standards are largely lacking, as, for 
example, in the case of biologicals, the govern- 
ment has been obliged to experiment in order to 
standardize materials. Safety standards in the 
United States are developed and assisted in 
operation by the Bureau of Mines, the Interstate 
Commerce Commission, the Bureau of Stand- 
ards and the Public Health Service, by the various 
departments in all the separate states and by an 
almost indefinite number of trade associations, 
engineering societies and other private organiza- 
tions exercising some degree of authority or 
control. The policing of standards already es- 
tablished may in such cases become less impor- 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



74 

tant than activities leading to the formulation of 
new standards, and this has been the aim of 
European factory inspection. Even in the United 
States, where there is a strict theoretical separa- 
tion of legislative, executive and judicial func- 
tions, it may conceivably happen that inspection 
activities, undertaken originally for purposes of 
enforcement, will furnish the necessary data for 
important and unheralded reforms. The wide- 
spread banking failures occurring in spite of 
supervision illustrate the weakness of a purely 
negative policy. 

Inspection by the government in so far as it 
merely supplements the work of private interests 
is thus undertaken in a somewhat accidental 
number of unrelated fields as an aid to business 
and as a protection to the public. Essentially the 
same function is performed almost universally 
by industry itself. Every producer has his 
products "inspected" at some stage of the 
process, although the standards for acceptance 
or rejection may be extremely variable. Even 
public health and public safety are protected to a 
degree by inspections conducted by insurance 
companies, whose standards may be higher than 
the government minima. Whether or not govern- 
ment inspection services continue to increase in 
importance and elaborateness depends primarily 
upon how far the movement toward commercial 
standardization can go. Industries may succeed 
in imposing standards upon themselves without 
government intervention, as the cooperative 
marketing associations have already done. And, 
conversely, if all industry should be conducted 
by government, inspection as a separate and 
conspicuous phenomenon might disappear. Or 
the general enforcement of standards might even 
become a function of supreme control, as it has 
in Soviet Russia, where the Workers' and 
Peasants' Inspection checks the activities of other 
branches of the government. 

EDITH AYRES 

See: GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF INDUSTRY; BUSI- 
NESS, GOVERNMENT SERVICES FOR; CONSUMER PROTEC- 
TION; FOOD AND DRUG REGULATION; ADULTERATION; 
LABOR LEGISLATION AND LAW; BUILDING REGULA- 
TIONS; PUBLIC HEALIH; SANITATION; LICENSING; 
GRADING; STANDARDIZATION; LAW ENFORCEMENT. 
Consult: Freund, E., Administrative Powers over Per- 
sons and Property (Chicago 1928); International La- 
bour Office, Geneva, Factory Inspection: Historical 
Development and Present Organisation in Certain 
Countries (Geneva 1923); Witte, Edwin E., "Revenues 
Derived under State Labor Laws" in Monthly Labor 
Review, vol. xxxiu (1931) 52-59; Bureau of Municipal 
Research, New York, Tenement House Administration 
(New York 1909); Tobey, J. A., The National Govern- 



ment and Public Health, Institute for Government 
Research, Studies in Administration (Washington 
1926); Mezger, O., Uber die Entwicklung der Lebens- 
mittelkontrolle in den versihiedenen Kulturstaaten 
(Stuttgart 1913); Weber, G. A , The Food, Drug and 
Insecticide Administration, and The Plant Quarantine 
and Control Administration, Institute for Government 
Research, Service Monographs, nos. 50 and 59 
(Washington 1928-30); United States, Department of 
Agriculture, "National Standards for Farm Products," 
by L. S. Tenny, Circular, no. 8 (rev. ed. 1930); Cleve- 
land, F. A., "The Financial Reports of National 
Banks as a Means of Public Control" in American 
Academy of Political and Social Science, Annals, vol. 
xxiv (1904) 43-66. 

INSTALMENT SELLING. An instalment 
sale, aside from a cash or down payment, is 
simply a credit or deferred payment transaction 
in contrast with a cash payment and does not 
differ in its nature from any other credit trans- 
action. Instalment credit provides for the pay- 
ment of goods in fixed instalments at stated in- 
tervals and in this respect it is a sort of funded 
debt in contrast with a demand obligation, which 
is payable at the request of the creditor, or the 
old fashioned book credit, which was payable in 
whole or in parts at the convenience of the 
debtor. It also stands in contrast with the kind of 
debt which runs for a stated period and which is 
to be paid in a lump sum at the end of the period. 
Instalment credit is protected by the commodity 
sold and is on the whole limited to goods with a 
resale value. The sales are usually conditional; 
the goods are delivered to the buyer, but the 
seller retains control over them; either the title 
remains in the seller and does not pass to the 
buyer until all the instalments are paid or the 
title passes immediately to the buyer and a 
chattel mortgage is given on the goods as security 
for the balance due. Default in payment usually 
gives the seller the right to repossess the goods; 
it also quite frequently forfeits all previously 
paid instalments. 

Instalment buying is an old practise; it existed 
in ancient Rome, where houses were sold on 
time payments. But the practise did not assume 
importance until the period of capitalist produc- 
tion for widespread markets; it developed real 
significance only in industrialized countries dur- 
ing the nineteenth century and came increasingly 
into use in spite of a measure of disrepute at- 
taching to it. As early as 125 years ago a furni- 
ture house in New York City was selling goods 
on time payments. Building and loan associa- 
tions, which provide for the buying of houses on 
this plan, have been in existence for more than 
seventy-five years. The Singer Sewing Machine 



Inspection Instalment Selling 



Company has been doing a very profitable in- 
stalment business since 1856. There are also 
numerous piano and other musical instrument 
houses that have been selling in this way for the 
same length of time. McCormick reapers and 
binders have been sold on instalments almost 
from the beginning of their use. Books have 
probably been sold on time for a longer period 
than any of the commodities mentioned; all en- 
cyclopaedias, beginning with Chambers' s En- 
cyclopaedia, which appeared about 1750, have 
been sold on instalments. An extensive indirect 
form of instalment selling was the "credit check" 
system. The customer bought from organiza- 
tions carrying on this kind of business a credit 
check for which he made a down payment and 
agrttd to pay the balance at stated periods; the 
check was then used to buy goods (except food) 
at specified stores. The credit check system still 
prevails in England and Germany; in Australia 
the system, known as cash orders, nourishes 
alongside instalment selling. 

Even though instalment selling similar to that 
which exists at the present time has been a com- 
mon practise for the past fifty years or more, the 
growth of the system was not great until the last 
fifteen years, when it experienced an enormous 
expansion in both volume of sales and number of 
industries affected. About 1915 instalment sell- 
ing was introduced into the automobile business 
in the United States, where it had a somewhat 
gradual growth for several years; after 1919 it 
suddenly expanded, reaching great volumes 
within a few years' time. In the industrial de- 
pression of 1920-21 the system spread to other 
lines of business and grew rapidly to large 
proportions. 

Exclusive of houses, which are widely sold on 
instalments, it is variously estimated that from 
five to seven billion dollars' worth of goods were 
being thus sold at retail annually prior to the 
beginning of the depression in 1929. According 
to the Department of Commerce retail sales in 
the United States in 1929 amounted to $50,000,- 
000,000. On the basis of an estimate of $6,000,- 
000,000, instalment sales composed 12 percent 
of retail sales. It is commonly estimated that the 
amount of instalment debt outstanding at a given 
time was from $2,225, 000,000 to $2,500,000,000, 
which is a more significant figure than the total 
of instalment sales over a period of one year's 
time. More than half the instalment debt out- 
standing is for automobiles; the next most im- 
portant items are furniture, radios, clothing and 
sewing machines. It is estimated that 70 percent 



75 

of automobiles with respect to value is sold on 
instalments; 70 percent of household furniture; 
80 percent of pianos; 80 percent of phonographs; 
75 percent of radio sets; 90 percent of washing 
machines; 85 percent of vacuum cleaners; 90 
percent of sewing machines; 70 percent of gas 
stoves; 90 percent of mechanical refrigerators; 
and 25 percent of jewelry. In 1927 approximately 
27 percent of tractors and other farm machinery 
was sold on instalments (approximately $100,- 
000,000). In recent years there has been a con- 
siderable increase in instalment sales of clothing 
and jewelry. Instalment selling has been used in 
the sale of stocks and bonds, but apparently not 
with any great success. 

Instalment selling in the United States is 
overwhelmingly in the form of conditional sales. 
Legal regulation of these sales varies from state 
to state; in a number of states the seller cannot 
retain title to goods sold on time and such con- 
ditional sales are not recognized as valid legally 
against third parties. There is agitation for the 
enactment of similar laws in other states. In the 
event the buyer defaults his payments the seller 
generally has three recourses: he may sue to re- 
cover the purchase price, he may foreclose the 
mortgage or he may repossess the commodity. 
Definite regulations are provided for in the Uni- 
form Conditional Sale Act adopted in many 
states; the seller, for instance, may repossess but 
he must give the buyer at least twenty days' 
notice, if the buyer docs not meet his obligations, 
the commodity is repossessed and sold at public 
auction. Efforts are being nude to secure uni- 
form laws governing instalment sales; meanwhile 
the National Association of Finance Companies 
is trying to standardize selling practises. 

Instalment buying in England is known as 
"hire purchase" and has been in use for many 
years in various branches of the furniture trade. 
In this form of sale the owner agrees to rent the 
article to the hirer or lessee (in reality the pur- 
chaser) for a stated period and stipulates a cer- 
tain number of instalments for rent; after the last 
one the lessee has the option of purchasing the 
article for a nominal sum, possibly no additional 
sum at all. The hire purchase system has made 
great strides since 1922, stimulated by over- 
production in certain lines of trade and by the 
business slump. According to the Hire Traders' 
Protective Association instalment sales in 1927 
accounted for 50 to 80 percent of the sales of 
automobiles; 70 percent of sewing machines, 
phonographs and pianos; 50 percent of furni- 
ture; and 10 percent of jewelry. Considerable 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



concentration prevails; a few large London firms 
with stores in various provincial towns do most 
of the business in instalment furniture. 

French law recognizes a form of conditional 
sale, known as vente a temperament, in which the 
title passes to the buyer. The seller cannot retain 
title to the article sold nor can he repossess it if 
the buyer defaults payment; the seller must sue 
in the courts. This legal restriction compels the 
instalment seller to be unusually careful in 
granting credit and eliminates much high pres- 
sure selling. Yet instalment selling is widespread 
in France; from 50 to 75 percent of motor cars 
are sold on time. 

In Germany instalment selling under which 
title to the property remains vested with the 
vender has become increasingly popular in re- 
cent years. It almost disappeared during the in- 
flation period but has since acquired a volume 
approaching in relative magnitude that of the 
United States. Approximately 75 percent of 
automobiles and furniture is sold on instalments. 
A considerable quantity of agricultural machin- 
ery is sold on time, one finance company devot- 
ing itself exclusively to that field. Banks partici- 
pate directly in the capital and management of 
many instalment finance companies. 

Instalment selling is found in almost all other 
countries; it has recently made considerable 
progress in the Balkans, Latin America and 
Japan. In all of these countries the articles sold 
on instalments consist mainly of furniture, auto- 
mobiles, sewing machines, bicycles and musical 
instruments; they do not include, owing to dif- 
ferent standards of living, some of the articles 
most commonly bought on instalments in the 
United States, such as electric washers, vacuum 
cleaners and electric refrigerators; nor are cloth- 
ing and jewelry included to any large extent. 
Instalment selling in Europe and Latin America 
has been greatly stimulated by the sale of Amer- 
ican automobiles abroad, a large proportion of 
which are sold on terms similar to those used in 
the United States. In Europe the proportion of 
automobiles sold on time payments averaged 61 
percent in 1927-28, ranging from 15 percent in 
Spain to 80 percent in Denmark. 

The recent expansion of instalment selling in 
the United States originated in developments in 
the automobile business. In the beginning of the 
industry manufacturers sold all cars at wholesale 
strictly for cash and urged retailers also to sell 
for cash. In time, however, through a desire to 
increase sales (emphasized by a great increase in 
plant capacity) the manufacturers changed their 



attitude in regard to the granting of credit by the 
retailer to the consumer. The easy terms which 
were finally granted to the consumer increased 
sales and output; this coincided with an im- 
mense increase in productive efficiency, and the 
combination of these factors produced lower 
prices. These in turn increased sales and output, 
bringing about a still further expansion of plant 
and equipment. This expansion of plant capacity 
exceeded the capacity of available markets to ab- 
sorb new cars, leading to an increase of both 
competition and instalment selling. Thus the 
automobile business developed the instalment 
system to a degree that made its former eifbrts 
seem comparatively insignificant. By 1923, how- 
ever, the increase in automobile instalment sales 
slowed down considerably; and the finance com- 
panies sought new business in other fields, 
thereby becoming an important factor in the 
spread of instalment selling. 

Other fields of business were prepared for in- 
stalment selling by poor sales and excess pro- 
ductive capacity during the depression of 1920- 
21. In the years just prior to 1920 plant and 
equipment had been expanded in the hope of 
great profits which were possible in the period of 
rapidly rising prices; and when the depression 
came some of these industries burdened with 
large overhead costs profited by the experience 
of the automobile industry and resorted to easy 
terms to the consumer as a means of increasing 
sales. The upsurge of prosperity in 1923 "again 
increased plant capacity and competition; instal- 
ment selling spread. Following this period new 
products such as radios and electric refrigerators 
were seldom sold for cash; while instalment sales 
slackened in the case of automobiles and were 
stationary in the case of pianos they increased 
over 200 percent in the case of radios. 

Competition among those selling the same 
kind of goods is a causal factor in the growth of 
instalment sales. If partial payment selling in a 
certain line of business stimulates sales and is 
otherwise successful, the manufacturer or re- 
tailer who refuses to use this device suffers. 
Under a regime of competitive business what- 
ever is generally advantageous becomes a neces- 
sity for all competitors. Competition first forced 
the granting of instalment credit and then the 
offering of easier credit conditions in smaller 
down payments and a longer time in which to 
pay the balance. The tendency in some instances 
to depart from standard conservative terms may 
also be attributed to competition among retailers 
engaged in the same kind of business, among 



Instalment Selling 



manufacturers producing the same commodity 
and among finance companies and banks for 
business in lending funds to finance instalment 
sales. 

Another factor in the spread of instalment sell- 
ing is the competition between different kinds of 
goods, the type of competition which was inten- 
sified in the period from 1922 to 1929. It is be- 
lieved generally that the public would purchase 
fewer radios, automobiles, mechanical refrigera- 
tors and the like if it were obliged to pay for 
them in a lump sum; and that consequently the 
purchasing power now expended on these com- 
modities would, unless it were saved, be di- 
verted to the purchase and consumption of other 
commodities. If the individual pledges his future 
income for automobiles, pianos and vacuum 
cleaners he will buy less clothing, food or the 
like than he would otherwise unless he is able to 
increase his income under the stimulus of instal- 
ment debts. In the opinion of many observers 
this latter condition is possible only in isolated 
cases and within narrow limits; consequently 
one of the effects of the increase in instalment 
selling has been a diversion of purchasing power 
from one group of goods to another. Instalment 
selling tends to slow down the sales of goods 
which cannot be sold on time payments; at the 
same time, however, it tends to induce consum- 
ers to purchase durable rather than ephemeral 
goods- 
Modern methods of advertising and high 
pressure salesmanship produced by the intensi- 
fication of competition have been partly respon- 
sible for the extension of instalment selling. In- 
stalment goods are among the most heavily ad- 
vertised, and this advertising is an important 
factor in the diversion of purchasing power facil- 
itated by instalment selling. Advertising and in- 
stalment selling combine to determine wants by 
increasing the prestige and popularity of certain 
wants as against others. 

When considered from the side of the demand 
for goods on instalment terms a very real factor 
in the instalment movement is to be found in the 
increase of the income of the wage earning and 
salaried groups. In recent years the middle class 
has increased in both numbers and income to a 
greater extent than any other section of the 
population; real wages have increased over 25 
percent in comparison with pre-war wages and 
there has been a similar increase in the salaries 
of clerical employees. The larger part of these 
gains in income were secured during the period 
from 1920 to 1925, the very time in which instal- 



77 

mcnt buying assumed large proportions. The 
increased income meant that people could buy, 
pay for and consume more than formerly on any 
terms of sale and undoubtedly helped to stimu- 
late the growth of instalment selling. Other 
forms of merchandising, however, such as mail 
order and cash and carry purchases, also greatly 
increased during the years of rapid growth of in- 
stalment selling. Credit facilities hitherto un- 
available were offered to consumers through the 
development of finance companies, and the in- 
creased real income of the consumers gave them 
more than sufficient purchasing power to meet 
all their instalment obligations as they came due. 

Before the recent expansion of the system buy- 
ing on the instalment plan, except in the case of 
houses, was practised almost entirely by the poor 
and by the unstable groups in the community. 
Losses to the dealers were great, and conse- 
quently the price charged for the credit was so 
high that only those who could not possibly make 
other arrangements bought on instalments. Up 
until about fifteen years ago there was strong 
social disapproval of the practise and there is 
still a certain stigma attached to some types of 
instalment buying. It is only within the last ten 
years that the practise has become generally 
respectable. 

At the present time instalment buying is not 
confined to the poorer classes. All economic 
groups except the very rich practise it exten- 
sively. Stores with a high class clientele sell 
furniture on instalments. Seven or eight years 
ago higher priced automobiles were sold on time 
payments only very quietly, but for the last few 
years they have been sold in the same manner 
and under the same conditions as cheaper cars. 
Electric refrigerators, too expensive to be bought 
by the poor, are sold largely on an instalment 
basis. While the largest number of instalment 
buyers is still to be found among the lower in- 
come groups, the total value of their purchases is 
probably less than that of the other groups; in 
fact, the great sources of instalment buying are 
probably among the middle class and upper lay- 
ers of skilled workers. Nor is instalment selling 
confined to any particular section or sections of 
the country; it is well established everywhere, in 
both urban and rural districts. 

One of the effects of instalment buying has 
been the creation of a new middleman, the fi- 
nance company, the business of which has grown 
to great size within a few years' time. The selling 
of automobiles on the partial payment plan 
created a demand for some special agency to 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



finance the sales; the finance companies which 
were organized to supply this need made pos- 
sible the growth of instalment buying by provid- 
ing the necessary credit facilities for the exten- 
sion of the system. Each new increase in instal- 
ment buying resulted in a still greater demand 
for the services of the finance companies, which 
rapidly increased in size and number. In func- 
tion these companies are in certain respects like 
commercial banks, although very few of them 
are incorporated under the banking laws and 
subject to regular examination by the state bank- 
ing departments. It is one of their functions to 
supply funds with which dealers can buy and 
carry a stock of goods. This activity is sometimes 
referred to as wholesale financing. They also ex- 
tend credit on a large scale to individual pur- 
chasers of goods bought on the instalment plan. 
This is sometimes called retail financing. The 
one service helps the dealer to buy goods, the 
other helps him to sell them on the instalment 
plan. In the final analysis instalment financing is 
accomplished by borrowing from commercial 
banks; the major finance companies borrow to 
the extent of five times their capital resources, 
with a smaller ratio among the smaller com- 
panies. 

The practises of finance companies in extend- 
ing credit to individual purchasers of goods 
bought on the instalment plan are so varied that 
it is impossible to generalize as to their methods. 
In the case of the automobile business, however, 
considerable uniformity exists. When an indi- 
vidual buys an automobile on the instalment 
plan he is usually required to pay in cash one 
third of the purchase price and to give a note 
which provides for a schedule of equal monthly 
payments to be made over periods of time rang- 
ing from three to twelve or more months. The 
dealer if he is able to do so sells these notes out- 
right to a finance company and thus receives cash 
for the goods sold on the instalment plan. When 
the dealer is able to sell the notes in this manner 
his legal responsibility ends. In most cases, 
however, he is required to endorse his custom- 
er's paper and assume the responsibility for its 
payment. Some of the finance companies dis- 
count the instalment notes in the regular way 
with banks located in the territory in which the 
notes originate. Others place their receivables in 
trust with some trust company and issue short 
term debentures against the trusteed notes, 
which are sold to banks. Sometimes collateral 
trust bonds running for a period of about ten 
years are sold. In any case the finance company 



secures additional funds with which to finance 
more instalment sales. 

Finance companies were at first organized by 
men not connected with the producing enter- 
prises, but later automobile companies formed 
their own finance companies (for example, the 
General Motors Acceptance Corporation organ- 
ized in 1919). Some important finance compa- 
nies are subsidiaries of commercial banks; gen- 
erally, even when affiliated with a particular in- 
dustry, the companies do a diversified business. 
There has recently been a tendency for finance 
companies to combine; this has been influenced 
not only by problems peculiar to the financing 
field but by the general tendency of American 
business. Concentration and centralization of 
control are accompanied by localized martage- 
ment; some of the finance companies have sub- 
sidiaries in foreign countries. In June, 1930, four 
finance companies had instalment paper out- 
standing amounting to $525,040,000, or ap- 
proximately one quarter of the total. The busi- 
ness is profitable , losses are small and failures are 
few. One of the larger finance companies, the 
Commercial Credit Corporation of Baltimore, 
with assets of $171,000,000 in 1930 paid over a 
period of nine years 85 percent in stock dividends 
in addition to substantial cash dividends. The 
General Motors Acceptance Corporation with a 
capital of $50,000,000 and assets of $381 ,000,000 
has an excellent dividend record; it paid 8. per- 
cent in 1923, 1924 and 1925 and 12 percent from 
1926 to 193 1 in addition to extras of 3 percent in 
1926, 5, 7, and 8 percent in 1927, 1928 and 1929 
respectively and 16 percent in 1930. 

The development of the finance company has 
had the economic effect of making possible more 
steady production in an industry where demand 
for the product is seasonal. The volume of sales 
of automobiles in the beginning of the industry 
was subject to extreme seasonal fluctuations; 
they became more moderate with the improve- 
ment of roads and the increased use of closed 
cars, but demand still varies considerably 
through the year. The industry has therefore 
been confronted with the difficult problem of 
how to secure steady production to meet a sea- 
sonal demand. The manufacturer's own capital as 
well as what he could borrow was needed for 
manufacturing purposes; this and other factors 
made it impossible for him to carry his entire 
output over the winter months. He did not have 
adequate storage space; even if he could have 
provided it, the problem would not have been 
solved, for cars must be distributed geographi- 



Instalment Selling 



cally before the spring demand arises. The dealer 
could not take the cars off the manufacturer's 
hands because he did not have funds of his own 
and could not secure them from the regular 
banks for this purpose. The development of the 
finance company solved the problem. It extended 
credit to the dealer permitting him to lay in his 
stock as it was finished at the factory. The manu- 
facturer was paid in cash. Production was con- 
tinuous. Transportation was more easily effected 
as it was spread over a longer time and the spring 
rush was lessened. The dealer was able to show 
his stock on his sales floor and have it ready for 
immediate delivery in order to meet the seasonal 
demand. 

Finance companies and retailers are able to 
extend credit to individual instalment buyers be- 
cause they in turn are able to borrow from banks. 
Some large retailers who have well organized 
credit departments carry on their instalment 
business without the service of finance com- 
panies and borrow directly from the banks to 
finance their instalment sales. Thus one of the 
costs to the finance company or the retailer is the 
interest that must be paid on borrowed funds. 
A second element of cost is that of a sum suffi- 
cient to cover losses in the case of individual 
buyers who default in payment. While complete 
statistical information is lacking, it is reported 
that the losses sustained by finance companies 
as a .whole average 0.5 percent; in automobile 
paper the loss is small, as low as o 2 percent on 
aggregate new and used car paper. It should be 
observed that the finance company's rate of loss 
does not show the loss sustained by the dealer. 
Some of the paper was "recourse" paper, that is, 
paper carrying the dealer's endorsement and for 
which the dealer stood the losses; in such cases 
the finance company lost nothing except in the 
event of the dealer's default. In reference to the 
losses sustained by dealers the statistics com- 
piled by the United States Department of Com- 
merce, based on a study of 10,992 representative 
retail establishments located in all sections of the 
country and representing all the principal lines 
of retail trade , show that the average bad debt 
loss on instalment sales in 1929 was 1.2 percent. 
These losses ranged from an average of 0.2 per- 
cent for those selling coal, wood, lumber and 
building material to an average of 7.9 percent for 
general clothing stores. A third cost is that of 
making the preliminary credit investigations 
which are necessary if the credit is extended 
wisely. A fourth expense is incurred in the pro- 
vision of the necessary facilities for making col- 



79 

lections on many small notes from numerous 
customers. There are other costs, particularly 
those in the nature of overhead expenses, such as 
the maintenance of places of business and the 
salaries of officers and general managers. 

The cost of instalment credit to the consumer 
as evidenced by the difference between the cash 
and credit prices of goods vanes greatly, ranging 
from nothing (where the cash and credit prices 
are the same) to as much as 80 percent, depend- 
ing upon the individual transaction. Extensive 
inquiry among retailers of all kinds as to the cash 
and credit prices of various commodities and 
examination of the rate schedules of a number of 
finance companies indicate that the usual cost of 
instalment credit ranges from 10 to 40 percent. 
Nominal interest rates are of course lower, but 
the real cost to the borrower becomes larger be- 
cause of the fact that the debt is repaid in instal- 
ments. In many cases the dealer increases the 
cash price of articles so that the spread between 
the cash and instalment price shall not appear 
excessive. 

Reasoning a priori individuals in both the 
United States and Europe have come to widely 
different conclusions in regard to the effect of 
instalment buying on saving. Business men have 
frequently advised their employees to go into 
debt for homes on the ground that it will give 
them a stake in the community and their job and 
will make them work harder and save more in 
order to meet their financial obligations. It is also 
set forth as a reasonable supposition that if the 
individual is not paying for furniture, vacuum 
cleaners and washing machines he is apt to spend 
his odd dollars in the theater or for other ephem- 
eral luxuries. It is also a fact that if the life of the 
commodity purchased is longer than the period 
of payment a saving has taken place. If, for ex- 
ample, the automobile has been paid for before 
it is worn out, the purchaser has made a saving 
provided he has not taken the money out of his 
savings account or mortgaged his house to com- 
plete the payments on the automobile. On the 
other hand, it is stated that instalment selling 
causes people to buy and consume luxuries 
which they would not buy if they were required 
to pay cash. It is argued that the instalment buyer 
soon acquires the luxury habit by being able to 
possess these articles, and that the luxury habit 
thus acquired leads to spending and consuming 
rather than to saving. Those who think that in- 
stalment buying is not conducive to saving men- 
tion frequently the demoralizing effect of too 
much debt on the individual. Against this view it 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



80 



may be argued that instalment buying substi- 
tutes a plan or orderly method of payment for 
arrangements which sometimes have had little 
system in them, and consequently has a distinct 
disciplinary value. 

Instalment buying in its present volume has 
existed for a comparatively few years, and experi- 
ence with it has been too brief to prove anything 
conclusive in regard to its effect upon savings. 
The goods bought and paid for on the instalment 
plan between 1920 and 1929 were apparently not 
paid for out of savings; while large quantities of 
goods were being bought and paid for and per- 
haps only partly consumed, the savings of all in- 
come groups were apparently increasing at an 
unusual rate. The statistics on savings are not 
conclusive, but they do seem to indicate that 
savings are at least not declining because of in- 
stalment selling. It is true that the $2,500,000,- 
ooo of outstanding instalment debt is a liability 
of the instalment buying group. But it is also 
true that this liability is perhaps more than 
covered by assets in the form of more or less 
durable goods. Finally, there is a growing belief 
that savings have been overstressed in the past 
and that spending is as important a factor as 
saving in promoting economic progress and sta- 
bility. The danger is that the individual unpro- 
tected by a comprehensive system of social in- 
surance may ignore the needs of illness and old 
age in his urge to spend. 

When first introduced instalment sales create 
new consumer purchasing power. The instal- 
ment debt outstanding at any given moment rep- 
resents goods which would not otherwise have 
been sold or produced. Since instalment selling 
is necessarily limited to particular kinds of 
goods, there are limits to its expansion. When 
that limit is reached and stabilization sets in, in- 
stalment selling becomes an ordinary institu- 
tional factor in the business mechanism and 
ceases to be an additional stimulus to increasing 
production. This may have a disturbing effect on 
an industry keyed up to unusually rapid expan- 
sion, an effect which becomes still more disturb- 
ing if instalment sales decline. 

Instalment selling also exerts a decided influ- 
ence on the character and structure of industry. 
Most of the goods sold on time are of the more 
durable variety; in 1928 the instalment sales of 
automobiles, radios, washing machines, mechan- 
ical refrigerators and similar goods accounted for 
approximately 70 percent of all instalment sales. 
Instalment selling therefore stimulates the ex- 
pansion of mass production industries with high 



fixed charges industries which are characteris- 
tic of modern large scale production. 

During the period of greatest growth in in- 
stalment selling, between 1920 and 1925, it was 
frequently predicted that the next period of 
business depression would destroy the instal- 
ment system if not the entire retail credit struc- 
ture. It was pointed out that because of the 
widespread unemployment which would result 
consumers would not be able to meet their 
obligations; there would therefore be a flood of 
repossessions, enormous credit losses and frozen 
accounts receivable, all of which would subject 
the credit structure to unbearable strain. Instal- 
ment risks, however, are highly diversified, 
spread over many classes of people. In a depres- 
sion only a part of the population become* un- 
employed, and the portion of the population sub- 
ject to the unemployment hazard includes only a 
fraction of those who have instalment payments 
to make. Moreover the instalment buyer usually 
strains all resources to make his payments and 
thus prevent repossession. It is not to be over- 
looked that a certain period of time elapses be- 
tween the outset of the crisis and the point at 
which unemployment becomes really acute, an 
interval sufficiently long for a considerable pro- 
portion of the outstanding debts to be repaid. 
Finally, instalment buying is not confined to 
wage earners and salaried employees. The in- 
come of other groups of instalment buyers is not 
so seriously affected by the depression as to en- 
danger repayment; while the purchasing power 
of the fixed income groups is in fact increased by 
the fall in prices. 

This view is apparently confirmed by the ex- 
perience of the depression year 1930. Statistics 
gathered by the retail credit survey of the United 
States Department of Commerce show that 
changes in 1930 in comparison with 1929 were 
not of a serious nature. True, repossessions, past 
due payments, losses and management expenses 
increased and the earnings of finance companies 
declined, although lower interest rates in bor- 
rowed money constituted a favorable factor for 
the companies. Numerous individual dealers and 
purchasers had trouble with their accounts; the 
strain on many instalment buyers, forced to re- 
strict expenditures or borrow money to meet 
their payments, was severe. But considering the 
fact that 1929 was on the whole a year of unusual 
business activity the changes were small. There 
were no disturbing increases or decreases in 
credit sales in relation to cash sales. Current 
obligations in the form of instalment accounts 



Instalment Selling Instinct 



for the first fourteen months after the crisis 
were paid in an orderly manner and new goods 
bought on these terms in the same proportion to 
cash sales as formerly, both showing approxi- 
mately the same relative decline. Taking the sys- 
tem as a whole, instalment credit stood the test 
of business recession in a manner that may be 
considered satisfactory. 

While instalment payments are met and the 
system satisfactorily withstands depression, an 
undoubted decrease in immediate consumer 
purchasing power takes place. Persons whose in- 
comes decline make their instalment payments, 
but they are paying for goods previously bought 
and to that extent are unable to buy new goods. 
This is offset by the creation of new purchasing 
power when instalment sales are increasing, but 
that is not true in periods of depression when 
instalment sales decline. They declined sharply 
in 1930-31, years of depression; in the first 
nine months of 1931, for example, instalment 
sales of automobiles declined $472,000,000, a 
drop of 20.4 percent over 1930. Precisely as in- 
stalment selling tends to increase prosperity it 
tends also to deepen and prolong depression; 
when, however, instalment selling begins once 
more to increase and create new purchasing 
power it becomes a contributing factor in busi- 
ness recovery. 

Instalment selling according to all indications 
is hec to stay; it has assumed a definite place in 
the institutional arrangements of business enter- 
prise. The system, however, will probably show 
no unusual expansion in the future as it did in 
the recent past; instalment selling will depend 
more closely on the general rate of economic 
progress or regression. 

W. C. PLUMMER 

See: MARKETING; LOANS, PERSONAL; MERCANTILE 
CREDIT; SMALL LOANS; MORTGAGE. 
Consult. Sehgman, E. R. A., The Economics of Instal- 
ment Selling, 2 vols. (New York 1927); Plummer, W. 
C., "Social and Economic Consequences of Buying on 
the Instalment Plan" in American Academy of Polit- 
ical and Social Science, Annals, vol. cxxix (1927) sup- 
plement; Crick, W. F., The Economics of Instalment 
Trading and Hire-purchase (London 1929), Danielian, 
N. R., "The Theory of Consumers' Credit" in Ameri- 
can Economic Review, vol. xix (1929) 393-411; Acad- 
emy of Political Science, "Problems of Prosperity" in 
Proceedings, vol. xn (1926-28) no. 11; "Where Instal- 
ment Buying Breaks" m New Republic, vol. xlvi (1926) 
18687; Johnson, Alvin, "No Danger in Instalment 
Buying" in New Republic, vol. xlvi (1926) 305-06; 
Merrick, R. G., The Modern Credit Company (Balti- 
more 1922); Wright, H. E., The Financing of Automo- 
bile Installment Sales (Chicago 1927); Grimes, W. A , 
Financing Automobile Sales by the Time-payment Plan 



8i 

(Chicago 1926); Griffin, B. W., Installment Sales and 
Collections (New York 1922); Comer, H D., The Ten- 
payment-plan of Retailing Men's Clothing, Ohio State 
University, Bureau of Business Research Monographs, 
no. v (Columbus 1926); Cordell, H. W., Instalment 
Credit in the Retail Furniture Trade, Ohio State Uni- 
versity, Bureau of Business Research, Monographs, 
no. xiv (Columbus 1930), Copeland, M. T , "Market- 
ing" in Conference on Unemployment (1921), Recent 
Economic Changes in the United State*, 2 vols. (New 
York 1929) vol. i, ch v, Estrich, W. A., The Law of In- 
stalment Sales of Goods (Rochester, N. Y. 1926); 
Earengey, W. G., The Law of Hire Purchase (London 
193). United States, Bureau of Foreign and Domestic 
Commerce, "Installment Selling of Motor Vehicles in 
Europe," Trade Information Bulletin, no. 550 (1928); 
Sprague, J B., "Panics and Time Payments" in 
Harper's Magazine, vol clxn (193031) 612-21; "In- 
stallment Selling Tested by Depression" m Literary 
Digest, vol cvn, no. 3 (1930) 48-50, United States, 
Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, "Retail 
Credit Survey," Domestic Commerce Series, since 1930; 
United States, Census Bureau, Census of Distribution, 
1930, Preliminary Reports, United States Summary of 
Retail Distribution (1931); Hobson, J. A , "Instalment 
Selling" in Contemporary Reinew, vol. cxxxm (1928) 
326-32; Whitelock, W. II , "The Industrial Credit 
System and Imprisonment for Debt" in Economic 
Journal, vol. xxiv (1914) 33-40; Kammermann, R , 
"Konsum-Fmanzierung" in Sihweizensche Zeitschnft 
fur Volkswirtschaft und Sozialpohtik, vol. xxxin, pt. li 
(1927) 129-45; Steucr, Wilh, Konsum- und Abtatz- 
finanzierung in Deutschland (Berlin 1930), Buhn, 
Hermann, Die Konsumfinanzierung (Werthcim 1930); 
Rupp, Werner, Die Konsumfinanzierung im Lichte 
theoretischer Kntik (Osterode in the Harz 1927). 

INSTINCT. The concept of instinct goes back, 
in a vague way at least, to Plato and Aristotle; 
it lacked specific definition among the Greeks 
because they did not distinguish clearly between 
inherited and acquired traits. With the revival of 
Greek philosophy in the Middle Ages the con- 
cept of instinct again appeared, especially in St. 
Thomas Aquinas, where it was identified more 
or less clearly with the idea of natural law work- 
ing through the individual to produce responses 
that are inherent in his spiritual endowment. 
These spiritual endowments derived from nat- 
ural law were fairly similar to the Aristotelian 
theological categories of the virtues and the vices. 
By the eighteenth century they had evolved into 
the definiteness of conscience, benevolence, 
sympathy and other moral sentiments and were 
basic to the philosophy of the English and Scotch 
ethicists of the seventeenth and eighteenth cen- 
turies, whose intellectual tradition harked back 
through Calvinistic predestination to natural 
law. The term instinct came into use with espe- 
cial frequency in the writings of the eighteenth 
century and was made to refer not only to the 



82 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



moral sentiments but also to the natural mental 
endowment. Specific instincts were rarely men- 
tioned by name, and the concept remained for 
the most part general until well into the nine- 
teenth century. 

The growth of biological analysis in the mid- 
dle of the nineteenth century and the rise of 
physiological psychology immediately thereafter 
as well as the great prestige of the biological 
approach to the study of man in that century 
stimulated the detailed analysis of mental hered- 
ity and the resultant classification of the in- 
stincts. This work was practically all speculative 
and a priori rather than experimental because 
of the difficulty of developing objective methods 
of analyzing the genetic aspects of behavior. 
The Germans, particularly Prcyer, a disciple of 
Darwin, following the more general emphasis of 
the Scotch and English cthicists as well as the 
new biology, developed lists of specific instincts 
and attempted to apply these to the analysis of 
child and adult behavior. In the United States 
William James followed the newer German lead 
and developed some fifty separate instincts, but 
he in turn was surpassed in the matter of quan- 
tity by later psychologists, notably by Thorn- 
dike and Wood worth. In Great Britain the same 
tendency to particularize instincts developed a 
little later under the leadership of McDougall. 
The groups working in education and social 
psychology, which increased rapidly after 1900, 
took over the trend and developed a large vari- 
ety of classifications. 

As late as 1918 or even 1920 the active or 
passive support of the instinct hypothesis in the 
United States by psychologists, sociologists and 
educationists appeared to be almost unanimous; 
and the economists, political scientists and his- 
torians were beginning to develop an interest 
in the concept of instinct along with their ex- 
pansion in the direction of a psychological ori- 
entation of their disciplines. As late as 1917 
Dewey, for example, emphasized the importance 
of the instinct interpretation for social psychol- 
ogy. By 1922 he had shifted to a basic emphasis 
upon the importance of habit in character inte- 
gration. Between 1921 and 192^ an acrimonious 
controversy arose over the question of instinct, 
and after the smoke and confusion were dissi- 
pated it seemed quite evident that the anti- 
instinctivists held the best positions on the field. 
The pro-instinctivists began to rearrange their 
broken legions in the form of redefinition and 
of substitute categories, such as drives, desires, 
wishes, hormic urges and prepotent reflexes; 



others retreated and took up position with the 
endocrinologists, psychoanalysts, gestaltists and 
other diverse schools. In Great Britain the criti- 
cism of the instinct usage and hypothesis is only 
now beginning in earnest, while on the conti- 
nent, where the instinctivist interpretation never 
became much of a scientific fad, the mild and 
relatively passive emphasis upon a general in- 
stinct interpretation continues. 

Many conceptions of instinct have obtained 
since the term came into use. It can scarcely be 
said that there was any definite basis for a care- 
ful discrimination between inherited and ac- 
quired elements in so-called instinctive behavior 
until the critical work of Wcismann and Mendel 
became generally available. The old metaphysi- 
cal concept of natural law as the source of human 
behavior and character did not contain a theory 
of biological inheritance, although it leaned 
toward one in its later phases and thus favored 
the biological interpretation of instinct without 
eliminating entirely the environmentalist inter- 
pretation. The Lamarckian theory, which in the 
nineteenth century made the transition from the 
natural law to the scientific or analytic explana- 
tion of the origin and integration of human 
traits, combined in true eclectic fashion the con- 
cepts of environmental and hereditary factors 
without analyzing either concept in detail. The 
forced abandonment of the Lamarckian eclec- 
ticism brought about by the experimental work 
of Mendel, Weismann and others ultimately 
forced the analysis of the concept of instinct in 
purely biological terms. This analysis was finally 
performed by the present writer, thus forcing 
the issue of the controversy in terms of inherited 
biological structure and acquired or conditioned 
behavior patterns. It became evident that most 
of the so-called instincts were not inherited 
mechanisms but either acquired patterns of be- 
havior or even conceptual language categories 
embracing large fields of functionally (not struc- 
turally) similar behavior. The new criticism on 
the basis of structural (including endocrine) bio- 
logical analysis also forced the abandonment of 
the widespread practise of defining and classify- 
ing so-called instincts in terms of their adjust- 
ment functions instead of in terms of their gene- 
sis. More popular uses of the term instinct, 
making it equivalent to unconscious, unpremed- 
itated, habitual or automatic activity, are being 
eliminated from writings in the field of the men- 
tal and social sciences, although they still freely 
persist among litterateurs and publicists, who 
usually come in contact with scientific criticism 



Instinct 



only indirectly and frequently a generation or 
more after it has been made. 

The definition of instinct most widely ac- 
cepted has been essentially biological and has 
varied but little, if at all, in its general concep- 
tion since the middle of the last century, al- 
though it has been subjected to greater precision 
of detail as biological knowledge has itself be- 
come more precise. In its simplest precise form 
this definition of an instinct may be stated as a 
specific and definite inherited or unlearned re- 
sponse which follows or accompanies a specific 
and definite sensory stimulus or organic condi- 
tion that serves as a release to the inherited 
mechanism. This definition of instinct bars both 
the conception of acquired instincts and the 
related conception, not infrequent in German 
and continental philosophic literature, that in- 
stincts are inherited behavior patterns which 
were at one period of the history of the race the 
result of rational adaptation. 

Among the most significant results for the 
social sciences of this stabilization of the instinct 
concept has been the revised outlook upon hu- 
man society and social control made possible 
to the social scientist, the educator, the legis- 
lator and the administrator. The social scientists 
are confronted with the problem of distinguish- 
ing inherited forms of behavior from those 
which are acquired. The narrowing of the scope 
of inherited behavior patterns as thus analyzed 
must frequently turn the educator, legislator and 
administrator, in the face of some difficult per- 
sonality or social situation, from the barren 
statement that "You can't argue with an in- 
stinct" or "You can't change human nature" 
to an intelligently constructive social program 
which will remove the obstructing or perverting 
conditioning factors and stimuli and lead them 
to substitute new environing pressures more 
favorable to the production of the desired ad- 
justment. The effect of the more critical study 
of instinct upon the subject matter and orien- 
tation of the social sciences themselves has been 
even more marked. The most immediate and 
thoroughgoing response to this analysis was 
from sociology and the branch of social psychol- 
ogy which works from the standpoint of soci- 
ology; these disciplines were somewhat distantly 
and haltingly followed by social work, which is 
considerably under the influence of the psycho- 
analytic theories regarding instinct. The uncriti- 
cal use of the term instinct by a branch of the 
institutional school of economics under the lead- 
ership of Veblen, who misapplied the erroneous 



concept in an otherwise brilliant analysis of soci- 
ety, has been turned into a more fruitful envi- 
ronmental and cultural analysis of traditional 
and conventional factors conditioning economic 
behavior. Political psychology, which at first 
responded to an instinct interpretation under the 
leadership of Graham Wallas, is now recover- 
ing its balance through environmental and per- 
sonality analysis. Psychology, which has closely 
trailed biology during recent decades, was slow- 
est to respond generally to the new critical 
findings regarding instinct; but very recently the 
biologists themselves have begun not only tacitly 
but also openly to accept the environmental 
analysis and interpretation of the factors which 
are responsible for the cultural elements in 
human behavior. 

L. L. BERNARD 

See: PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; EDUCATIONAL 
PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOANALYSIS; HAIHT; HUMAN NA- 
TURE; HhKtDiiY; BEHAVIORISM; ENVIRONMENTALISM; 
BIOLOGY. 

Consult: Hancock, Thomas, Essay on Instinct, and 
Its Physical and Moral Relations (London 1824); 
Brougham, H. P., Dialogues on Instinct; with Analyti- 
cal View of the Researches on Fossil Osteology (London 
1844), Preycr, W., Die Seele dcs Kindes (gth ed. Leip- 
sic 1923), tr. by H W. Brown, International Edu- 
cation series, vols. vn and ix (New York 1888-89), 
and Die geistige Enticickelung in der ersten Kindheit 
(Stuttgart 1893), tr. by H W. Brown as Mental De- 
velopment in the Child (New York 1893); James, 
William, The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. (New 
York 1890); McDougall, William, An Introduction to 
Social Psychology (rev ed. Boston 1926), Breed, F. S., 
The Development of Certain Instincts and Habits in 
Chicks (New York 1911), Veblen, Thorstein, The 
Instinct of Workmanship (new ed. New York 1918); 
Dcwcy, John, "The Need for Social Psychology" in 
Psychological Review, vol. xxiv (1917) 266-77; Wat- 
son, John B., "A Schematic Outline of the Emotions" 
in Psychological Review, vol xxvi (1919) 165-96; Dun- 
lap, Knight, "Are There Any Instincts?" in Journal 
of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, vol. 
xiv (1919-20) 307-11, Bernard, L. L , "The Misuse 
of Instinct in the Social Sciences" in Psychological 
Retnezv, vol. xxvui (1921) 96-119; Fans, Ellsworth, 
"Are Instincts Data or Hypotheses?" in American 
Journal of Sociology, vol. xxvn (1921-22) 184-96; 
Zing Yang Kuo, "Giving up Instincts in Psychology" 
in Journal of Philosophy, vol xvni (1921) 645-64; 
Josey, C. C., The Social Philosophy of Instinct (New 
York 1922); Dewey, John, Human Nature and Con- 
duct (New York 1922); McDougall, William, "Can 
Sociology and Social Psychology Dispense with In- 
stincts?" and discussion by L. L. Bernard in American 
Journal of Sociology, vol. xxix (1923-24) 657-73; Ber- 
nard, L. L., Instinct- a Study in Social Psychology 
(New York 1924); Mitchell, T. W , Problems in Psy- 
chopathology (London 1927) p. 97-117; Ginsberg, 
Morris, "The Place of Instinct in Social Theory" in 
Econornica, vol. xi (1931) 25-44. 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



INSTITUTION is a verbal symbol which for 
want of a better describes a cluster of social 
usages. It connotes a way of thought or action of 
some prevalence and permanence, which is em- 
bedded in the habits of a group or the customs of a 
people. In ordinary speech it is another word for 
procedure, convention or arrangement; in the 
language of books it is the singular of which the 
mores or the folkways are the plural. Institutions 
fix the confines of and impose form upon the 
activities of human beings. The world of use and 
wont, to which imperfectly we accommodate our 
lives, is a tangled and unbroken web of institu- 
tions. 

The range of institutions is as wide as the in- 
terests of mankind. Any simple thing we observe 
a coin, a time table, a canceled check, a base- 
ball score, a phonograph record has little sig- 
nificance in itself; the meaning it imparts comes 
from the ideas, values and habits established 
about it. Any informal body of usage the com- 
mon law, athletics, the higher learning, literary 
criticism, the moral code is an institution in 
that it lends sanctions, imposes tabus and lords 
it over some human concern. Any formal organi- 
zation the government, the church, the uni- 
versity, the corporation, the trade union im- 
poses commands, assesses penalties and exercises 
authority over its members. Arrangements as 
diverse as the money economy, classical educa- 
tion, the chain store, fundamentalism and de- 
mocracy are institutions. They may be rigid or 
flexible in their structures, exacting or lenient in 
their demands; but alike they constitute stand- 
ards of conformity from which an individual may 
depart only at his peril. About every urge of 
mankind an institution grows up; the expression 
of every taste and capacity is crowded into an 
institutional mold. 

Our culture is a synthesis or at least an ag- 
gregation of institutions, each of which has its 
own domain and its distinctive office. The func- 
tion of each is to set a pattern of behavior and to 
fix a zone of tolerance for an activity or a comple- 
ment of activities. Etiquette decrees the rituals 
which must be observed in all polite intercourse. 
Education provides the civilizing exposures 
through which the potential capacities of indi- 
viduals are developed into the abilities for per- 
formance, appreciation and enjoyment which 
are personality. Marriage gives propriety to the 
sex union, bestows regularity upon procreation, 
establishes the structure of the family and ef- 
fects such a mediation as may be between per- 
sonal ambition and social stability. A number of 



institutions may combine and compete to im- 
press character upon and give direction to the 
mass of human endeavor. The state claims pri- 
mary obedience and imposes a crude order upon 
the doings of mankind; the law by punishing of- 
fenses and settling disputes determines the out- 
most limits of acceptable actions; morality with 
neater distinctions and more meticulous stand- 
ards distinguishes respectable from unconven- 
tional conduct. The community is made up of 
such overlapping provinces of social government. 
It is the institution in its role of organizer which 
makes of this a social and not a monadic world. 

It is impossible to discover for such an organic 
complex of usages as an institution a legitimate 
origin. Its nucleus may lie in an accidental, an 
arbitrary or a conscious action. A man savage 
or civilized strikes a spark from flint, upturns 
the sod, makes an image of mud, brews a con- 
coction, mumbles a rigmarole, decides a quarrel 
or helps himself to what he may require. The act 
is repeated, then multiplied; ideas, formulae, 
sanctions and habits from the impinging culture 
get attached; and gradually there develops a 
ritual of fire, a hoe and spade agronomy, a cere- 
monial for appeasing the gods, a cult of healing, 
a spell for casting out devils, a due process of 
law or a sound business policy. Even if it is 
deliberately established an institution has neither 
a definite beginning nor an uncompromised 
identity. A religious creed or a legislative statute 
is compounded of beliefs and ideas which bear 
the mark of age and of wear; a paper charter and 
a document engrossed upon parchment are not 
insulated against the novelties in usage which 
attend the going corporation and the living con- 
stitution. It is impossible even in the most rudi- 
mentary culture to find folkways which are 
simple and direct answers to social necessities. 
In all societies, however forward or backward, 
the roots of the most elementary of arrange- 
ments barter, burial, worship, the dietary, the 
work life, the sex union run far back into the 
unknown past and embody the knowledge and 
ignorance, the hopes and fears, of a people. 

In fact as an aspect of a continuous social 
process an institution has no origin apart from 
its development. It emerges from the impact of 
novel circumstances upon ancient custom; it is 
transformed into a different group of usages by 
cultural change. In institutional growth the 
usual may give way to the unusual so gradually 
as to be almost unnoticed. At any moment the 
familiar seems the obvious; the unfamiliar ap- 
pears but a little revealed an implication in a 



Institution 



convention which is itself taken for granted, a 
potentiality slowly quickening into life. So it is 
that the corporation is still a person, the work of 
the machine is manufacture, the labor contract 
concerns masters and servants and industrial ac- 
cidents are personal wrongs. It often happens 
that new arrangements spring up under the 
cloak of an established organization. Thus the 
empire of the Caesars emerged behind the forms 
of the republic, the holy Catholic church is 
nominally the episcopal see of Rome and the 
British Commonwealth does its business in the 
name of His Majesty. In like manner in the 
domain of ideas the novelty in doctrine usually 
appears as a gloss upon the ancient text; systems 
of theology are commentaries upon the words of 
Scripture; Coke and Cooley set down their own 
understanding of the law upon the authority of 
Littleton and Blackstone. Thus too so intangible 
a thing as a social theory or a public policy may 
emerge from the practical commitments of the 
moment. A mere expediency, such as the aboli- 
tion of the corn laws, is abstracted from cause 
and occasion and becomes a generalized policy of 
free trade; or a comprehensive scheme of railway 
regulation, such as obtains in the United States, 
appears as a by-product of the empirical elimi- 
nation of specific abuses. In the course of events 
the fact arrives before the word and new wine 
must be put up in old bottles. Novelties win a 
tacit acceptance before their strangeness is no- 
ticed and compel before their actuality is ap- 
preciated. In institutional life current realities 
are usually to be found behind ancient forms. 

As an institution develops within a culture it 
responds to changes in prevailing sense and 
reason. A history of the interpretation of Aris- 
totle or St. Paul or Kant at various periods indi- 
cates how easily a document lends itself to suc- 
cessive systems of ideas. The public regulation 
of business has consistently even if belatedly re- 
flected the prevailing winds of doctrine upon the 
relation of the state to industry. The pages of the 
law reports reveal the ingenuity with which, in 
spite of professions that the law remains the 
same, old rules and standards are remade to 
serve changing notions of social necessity. An 
institution which has enjoyed long life has man- 
aged to make itself at home in many systems of 
thought. The classic example is the Christian 
Gospel. The simple story of the man Jesus pres- 
ently became a body of Pauline philosophy; the 
Middle Ages converted it into an intricate theo- 
logical system and the rationalization of a power- 
ful ecclesiastical empire; at the individualistic 



touch of the Reformation it became a doctrine of 
the personal relationship between man and his 
maker; it is today patching up a truce with 
Darwinism, the scientific attitude, relativity and 
even religious skepticism. In this continuous 
process of the adaptation of usage and arrange- 
ment to intellectual environment an active role 
is assumed by that body of ideas taken for granted 
which is called common sense. Because it deter- 
mines the climate of opinion within which all 
others must live it is the dominant institution in 
a society. 

In an even broader way an institution is ac- 
commodated to the folkways of a culture. As 
circumstances impel and changing ideas permit, 
a usage in high esteem, like piracy, may fall from 
grace; while another under tabu, such as birth 
control, may first win tolerance and in time 
general acceptance. As one social system passes 
into another and the manner of living and the 
values of life are transformed, one institution 
gives way to another better adapted to the times. 
It required a number of changes in use and 
wont to convert the ordeal by combat into the 
trial by law; the prestige of the family tie, of 
blood vengeance, of the magical ritual and of 
might made right had to decline and a conscious- 
ness of the waste and injustice which attended 
legalized conflict had to become prevalent. An 
institution that survives, such as matrimony, re- 
sponds surely even if stubbornly to cultural 
change. While the basis of Christian marriage is 
no more than the primitive custom of monogamy, 
the rigid lines of the institution bear the marks 
of the mediaeval order. It gave support to a caste 
system resting upon landed property, elevated 
the social values of family above the individual 
values of love, was blessed with the ascetic ideal 
of otherworldliness and became a sacrament. 
Companionate marriage is emerging from a dif- 
ferent world of fact, appreciation, habit and be- 
lief. It reduces to usage an attempt to escape the 
rigors of matrimony without resort to casual 
relationships; it reflects the condition of an 
urban society where blood is no longer blue, life 
is impersonal, children are a luxury and women 
must earn their own livings. In a culture which 
develops slowly enough to allow a graceful ac- 
commodation folkways may be drawn together 
into rich and intricate institutional patterns. In 
the Middle Ages the usages of the church the 
trinity, the creed, the litany, the ecclesiastical 
empire were all fused into a single conventional 
whole, to which unity was given by the idea of 
the death of the god as a vicarious atonement. In 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



86 



the late eighteenth century politics, law, econom- 
ics, ethics and theology in separate domains alike 
attempted to superimpose a symmetrical system 
of mechanical principles upon the mass of hu- 
man behavior; the common element was an 
analogue horrowed from physical science. In the 
social process the life of an institution depends 
upon its capacity for adaptation. But always amid 
the whirl of change elements of disorder are 
present; and long before a harmony is achieved 
between unlike conventions disintegration has 
set in. 

Nor is an institution introduced from an alien 
society immune to this process of development. 
The act of borrowing merely gives the oppor- 
tunity for its transformation. The nucleus is 
liberated from its cultural matrix and takes on 
the character of the usages among which it is set 
down. In their native habitat the books of the 
Old Testament were the literature of a people; in 
the strange world of the mediaeval schoolmen 
they became a collection of verses inviting 
dialectical exposition. In England "the higher 
law" was invoked to justify a popular revolution 
against an irresponsible monarchy; in America it 
has become the sanction for a judicial review of 
legislative acts. In appropriating the machine 
process Russia stripped away the enveloping 
business arrangements and made of it an instru- 
ment to serve a national social economy. The act 
of transplantation may at first retard but even- 
tually is likely to promote growth. It introduces 
into a culture an unknown usage but allows it to 
emerge as an indigenous institution. 

Its very flexibility makes an institution a 
creature of social stress and strain. In a stable or 
slowly changing society it fits rather neatly into 
the cultural pattern; amid the disorder which 
change brings its office may be compromised by 
the inflexibility of its structure. As necessity 
changes, tradition and inertia may stand in the 
way of the performance of new duties. A group 
of usages, for all the new demands upon it, may 
never quite escape slavery to its past. The shadow 
of ordeal by combat still hangs heavy over trial 
by law; the jury decides the contest, the judge is 
the umpire, the procedures are the rules of the 
game, the witnesses are clansmen armed with 
oaths and the attorneys are the champions; an 
appeal court orders a new trial not primarily for 
want of justice but because of error in the con- 
duct of the ordeal. The United States Supreme 
Court has come to be the official interpreter of 
the constitution; yet by tradition its function is 
judicial, and it is only as an issue is germane to 



the disposition of a case that it can declare the 
meaning of the higher law. Almost every insti- 
tution from the superfluous buttons on the 
sleeve of a coat to the ceremonial electors in a 
presidential contest bears the vestigial mark of 
a usage which is gone. 

But its elements of stability may be powerless 
to prevent the conversion of an institution to a 
service for which it was never intended. Its 
existence and repute give it value; it may ad- 
ventitiously or by design assume a new character 
and play a new role in the social order. Equity, 
once an informal method of doing justice, now 
possesses all the appurtenances of a system of 
law. The principle of "no liability without fault" 
was once the basis of an individualistic law of 
torts; in our times the rules of recovery are biting 
socialized, as, for example, in workmen's com- 
pensation, by a mere extension of "fault" to acts 
involving no personal blame. An institution may 
even fall into the hands of the enemy and be used 
to defeat its reputed purpose. Thus a community 
of ascetics develops into a wealthy monastic es- 
tablishment; a theory of social contract invented 
as a justification of monarchy is converted into a 
sanction for its overthrow; a party dedicated to 
personal freedom becomes the champion of 
vested wealth; and a philosophy contrived to 
liberate thought rerruiins to enslave it. As time 
and chance present their problems, men meet 
them with expediencies as best they can; but 
those who contrive rules and formulae cannot 
control the uses to which they are put. The 
proneness of an institution, like a lost sheep, to 
go astray, has been caught in the sentence: 
"Saint Francis of Assisi set out to bring people 
to sweetness and light, and left in his wake a 
plague of gray friars." The folkways are marked 
by a disposition of event to belie intent. 

In the course of time the function of an insti- 
tution may be compromised by or perhaps even 
be lost in its establishment. The spirit may be- 
come the letter, and the vision may be lost in a 
ritual of conformity. In time a way of intellectual 
inquiry may become a mere keeping of the faith; 
a nice propriety in social relations may decay 
into a code of etiquette; or a morality intended 
to point the way toward the good life may come 
to impose the duty of doing right. Thus cere- 
monial replaces purposive action and claims a 
vicarious obedience. The existence of an informal 
institution gets buttressed about by prevailing 
opinion and by personal interest. In legislative 
"deliberation" statesmen cherish their stock in 
trade of tune honored argument and resent the 



Institution 



appearance of unfamiliar issues; scholars of re- 
pute defend the established ways of inquiry and 
the accepted verities; and social lights conserving 
the older proprieties against feminism "en- 
trench themselves behind their tea-cups and de- 
fend their frontiers to the last calling-card." 
The persons immediately concerned have their 
stakes in arrangements as they are and do not 
wish to have personal position, comfort of mind 
or social prestige disturbed. As it crystallizes 
into reputable usages an institution creates in its 
defense vested interest, vested habit and vested 
ideas and claims allegiance in its own right. 

If an institution becomes formal, an even 
greater hazard to its integrity is to be found in its 
organization and its personnel. A need for order 
finds expression in a government or the demand 
for justice in a legal system or the desire for wor- 
ship in a church; and various groups become 
interested in its structure and offices, its proce- 
dures and emoluments, its ceremonials and con- 
solations. A host of officials great and small 
comes into being, who are as solicitous about 
the maintenance of the establishment to which 
they are committed. They possess preferences 
and prejudices, are not immune to considera- 
tions of prestige and place and are able to ration- 
alize their own interests. As the scheme of ar- 
rangements grows rigid, "the good of the na- 
tion" or the church or the party or the lodge or 
whirtever it is tends to become dominant. The 
lines of activity may be frozen into rigidity and 
ecclcsiasticism, legalism, constitutionalism and 
ritualism remain as fetishes to be served. An in- 
stitution when once accepted represents the 
answer to a social problem. In the maze of ad- 
vantage, accommodation, sense and reason which 
grows up about it lies a barrier to the considera- 
tion of alternatives. Its successor for better or for 
worse is likely to prevail only through revolu- 
tion or by stealth. 

In its ideal likeness an institution usually 
creates its apology. As long as it remains vital, 
men accommodate their actions to its detailed 
arrangements with little bother about its in- 
herent nature or cosmic purpose. As it begins to 
give way or is seriously challenged, compelling 
arguments for its existence are set forth. The 
picture-as-it-is-painted is likely to be rather a 
work of art than a representation of fact, a prod- 
uct rather of rationalization than of reason; and, 
however adventitious its growth, disorderly its 
structure or confused its function, the lines of 
its defense lack nothing of trimness and purpose. 
The feudal regime was an empirical sort of an 



affair; men of iron lorded it over underlings as 
they could, yielded to their betters as they were 
compelled and maintained such law and order as 
the times allowed; but with its passing its sprawl- 
ing arrangements and befuddled functions were 
turned into office and estate ordained of God. In 
the days of the Tudors kings were kings without 
any dialectical to-do about it; the overneat state- 
ment of the theory of divine right had to await 
the decadent monarchy of the Stuarts. The 
tangled thing called capitalism was never created 
by design or cut to a blue print; but now that it is 
here, contemporary schoolmen have intellectual- 
ized it into a purposive and self-regulating in- 
strument of general welfare. If it is to be re- 
placed by a "functional society," the new order 
will emerge blunderingly enough; but acquisi- 
tion of a clean cut structure and clearly defined 
purpose will have to wait upon its rationalizers. 
An assumption of uniformity underlies all 
apologies; invariably they impose simple, ab- 
stract names, such as monarchy, democracy, 
competition and socialism, upon a mass of di- 
vergent arrangements. 

In this endowment with neatness and purpose 
an institution is fitted out with the sanctions and 
trappings of ancient usage. Republican govern- 
ment harks back to Greece and Rome; the 
"liberties" for which seventeenth century Eng- 
lishmen fought were the ancient rights of man. 
Magna Carta, a feudal document, was remade to 
serve the cause of Parliament against king; a 
primitive folk government was discovered in the 
dim twilight of the German forests to give to 
English democracy a fountainhead which was 
neither French nor American; and "the spirit of 
'76" grew up long after the event to serve the 
patriotism of another century. In the courts it is 
a poor rule which cannot find a good reason in 
former decisions and fit itself out with an ancient 
lineage. But law does not invoke the sanction of 
precedent more often than other institutions; the 
openness of its written records merely makes 
more evident the essential process. A succession 
of usages stretching from Aristotle to Calhoun 
has been justified as expressions of the natural 
order. Even or above all in the church the 
prevailing dogma is set down as interpretations 
of the creed of the apostles; and Christian mar- 
riage "was instituted by God in the time of man's 
innocency." As tradition leaves its impress upon 
fact, fact helps to remake tradition. The thing 
that is is the thing that always was. 

It is only as stability gives way to change that 
the lines of an institution stand out in sharp re- 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



lief. So long as a people is able to do as its 
fathers did it manifests little curiosity about the 
arrangements under which it lives and works; 
the folk of the South Sea Islands can administer 
justice after their ways, but they can neither 
give answers to hypothetical cases nor tell in 
abstract terms what they do. So long as the pro- 
cedure of a group or a school is unquestioned it 
is little aware of the conventions and values 
which give character even to outstanding achieve- 
ment: Scott had little conscious appreciation of 
the distinctive qualities of the English novel; 
Jowett could never have put in terms the pecu- 
liar features of Oxford education; and Kant 
might not have been able to place his own phi- 
losophy in time and opinion. But the break of 
usage from usage within a culture and the re- 
sulting maladjustment lead to a discovery of 
the detail which makes up an institution. A num- 
ber of crises were required to reveal the customs 
which are the British constitution; it took a Civil 
War to make clear the nature of the union be- 
tween the American states. The appearance of 
social unrest was essential to an appreciation of 
the difference between competition and laissez 
faire and between industry and business. An 
aesthetic revolt marked by a riding into almost 
all the winds that blow was requisite to a realiza- 
tion of the distinctive modes and values in 
classical music and in Gothic architecture and to 
an appreciation of the molds imposed by ac- 
ceptable form upon creative effort. For such 
casual glimpses of the intricacies of social institu- 
tions as men are permitted to see they are in- 
debted to the stress and strain of transition. 

It follows almost of course that institutional 
development drives a fault line between current 
fact and prevailing opinion. Men see with their 
ideas as well as with their eyes and crowd the 
novel life about them into outmoded concepts. 
They meet events with the wisdom they already 
possess, and that wisdom belongs to the past and 
is a product of a by-gone experience. As new 
institutions gradually emerge from the old, men 
persist in dealing with the unfamiliar as if it 
were the familiar. A national legislature by the 
enactment of antitrust laws tries to superimpose 
the competitive pattern upon the turbulent forces 
of a rising industrialism; a trade union uses the 
traditional device of a strike to advance wages 
in an industry in which the unorganized plants 
can easily supply the total output; a group of 
elder statesmen approaches the problems of war 
debts and reparations with the old formula of 
protection versus free trade. At a time when a 



depression bears witness to economic disorder 
the institution of business is discussed in the 
outgrown vocabulary of private property, liberty 
of contract, equality of opportunity and free 
enterprise; and rugged American individualism 
is invoked as a way of order for a system which 
has somehow become an uncontrolled and un- 
acknowledged collectivism. Even the Protestants 
as often as not turn belief into denial; and heresy 
shackled to an inherited ideology is merely a re- 
verse orthodoxy. In the flux of modern life the 
various usages which with their conflicting 
values converge upon the individual create diffi- 
cult problems that demand judgment; and in the 
course of very human events it is the fate alike of 
individual, group and society to have to meet 
emerging fact with obsolescing idea. 

Thus an institution like the living thing it is 
has a tangled identity. It cannot be shown in per- 
spective or revealed in detail by the logical 
method of inclusion and exclusion. It holds with- 
in its actuality the vestiges of design and acci- 
dent, the stuff of idea and custom, from many 
ages, societies, civilizations and climates of 
opinion. In any important group of institutions, 
such as marriage, property, the market or the 
law, there are to be discovered as inseparable 
aspects of an organic whole notions, procedures, 
sanctions and values hailing from cultural points 
far apart. Each holds within its being elements 
in idea and in form drawn from the contempo- 
rary era of relativity, the rational universe of the 
eighteenth century, the mediaeval world of abso- 
lutes and verities and the folkways of some dim 
far off era. An institution is an aspect of all that 
it has met, a potential part of all that it will en- 
counter. It holds many unknown possibilities 
which a suitable occasion may kindle into life. 
It may continue to hold sanctions which we 
think have departed; it may already have come 
to possess compulsions of which we are still un- 
mindful. The discovery of its meaning demands 
an inquiry into its life history; but even the 
genetic method will tell much less than we should 
like to know of how a thing which cannot for 
long abide came to be. 

Moreover the way of knowledge is itself an 
institution. The physical world, natural re- 
sources and human nature may be elementary 
things; but we can learn about them only in 
terms of and to the extent allowed by our pre- 
vailing methods of inquiry. The little we under- 
stand of the universe is a function of the size of 
the telescope, the sensitiveness of the photo- 
graphic plate and the bundle of intellectual 



Institution 



usages called astronomy. Our national resources 
are a product of technology, and their cata- 
logues at different times reflect the contempo- 
rary states of the industrial arts. It was the steam 
engine and the machine which made of coal and 
iron potential wealth; it was not until Faraday 
and Edison had done their work that electricity 
became potential energy. The little we under- 
stand or think we understand about human na- 
ture is an institutional product. The inquiries 
called physiology, anatomy and neurology each 
of them a bundle of intellectual usages reveal 
no more than the raw material of personal char- 
acter; the stuff has ripened into individuality 
within the matrix of the prevailing folkways. 
Man and woman arc so much creatures of cus- 
tom and belief that the word innate is most 
treacherously applied to masculine and feminine 
traits. In various societies the stages upon which 
peoples must play their parts are set so differently 
by social heritage that we can as yet speak with 
little certainty about racial characteristics. The 
physical world and the human nature we know 
are aspects of the prevailing state of culture. In 
matter and in the chromosome may lie limitless 
possibilities; the actualities which appear are 
creatures of social institutions. 

Among the ways of knowing is "the institu- 
tional approach." Institutes as the ordained 
principles of a realm of learning or of life have 
long .existed; they are known to theology, law, 
education and all subjects ruled over by dialec- 
tic. About the turn of the last century a genetic 
study of the folkways began to win academic re- 
spectability. It could make little headway so long 
as the Newtonian concept was dominant; in- 
quirers went in search of laws and uniformities, 
explanations were set down in mechanical for- 
mulae and the end of the quest was an articulate 
and symmetrical body of truths. The institu- 
tional method had to wait until the idea of de- 
velopment was incorporated into academic 
thought and the mind of the inquirer became re- 
signed to the inconsistency which attends growth . 
The analogy with a biological organism had to be 
renounced and a basis in ideology had to be dis- 
covered before it could become a fruitful 
method of study in economics, history, philos- 
ophy, law and politics. The practical impulse 
toward its use came with a change in public 
opinion; so long as laissez faire dominated our 
minds, dialectic served well enough to turn out 
explanatory apologies for the existing social 
arrangements; when we began to demand that 
order and direction be imposed upon an unruly 



society, a genetic study of how its constituent 
usages had grown up into an empirical organi- 
zation seemed proper. An inquiry into institu- 
tions may supply the analytical knowledge 
essential to a program of social control or it may 
do no more than set adventures for idlecuriosity. 
In either event the study of institutions rests it- 
self upon an institution. 

Accordingly an institution is an imperfect 
agent of order and of purpose in a developing 
culture. Intent and chance alike share in its 
creation; it imposes its pattern of conduct upon 
the activities of men and its compulsion upon 
the course of unanticipated events. Its identity 
through the impact of idea upon circumstance 
and the rebound of circumstance upon idea is 
forever being remade. It performs in the social 
economy a none too clearly defined office a 
performance compromised by the maintenance 
of its own existence, by the interests of its per- 
sonnel, by the diversion to alien purpose which 
the adventitious march of time brings. It may 
like any creation of man be taken into bondage 
by the power it was designed to control. It is a 
folkway, always new yet ever old, directive and 
responsive, a spur to and a check upon change, a 
creature of means and a master of ends. It is in 
social organization an instrument, a challenge 
and a hazard; in its wake come order and dis- 
order, fulfilment, aimlessness and frustration. 
The arrangements of community life alike set 
the stage for and take up the shock of what man 
does and what he leaves undone. Institutions 
and human actions, complements and antitheses, 
are forever remaking each other in the endless 
drama of the social process. 

WALTON H. HAMILTON 

See: CULTURE; SOCIAL PROCESS; CHANCE, SOCIAL; 
HUMAN NATURE; CUSTOM, FOLKWAYS; FASHION; ASSO- 
CIATION; COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR; FUNCTIONALISM; 
ECONOMICS, section on INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS. 
Consult: Lowie, R. II., Primitive Society (New York 
1920); Sumner, W. G., Folkways (Boston 1906); 
Sumner, W. G., and Keller, A. G , Science of Society, 
4 vols. (New Haven 1927-28); Veblen, Thorstem, 
The Theory of the Leisure Clats: an Economic Study of 
Institutions (new ed. New York 1918), The Theory of 
Business Enterprise (New York 1904), and Absentee 
Ozunership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times 
(New York 1923); Cooley, C. H., Human Nature and 
the Social Order (rev. ed. New York 1922), and Social 
Process (New York 1918), especially pt. vi; Maclver, 
R. M., Community (3rd ed. London 1924) bk. n, ch. 
iv; Hobhouse, L. T., Social Development (London 
1924) ch. xi; Cole, G. D. H , Social Theory (London 
1920) p. 41-44 and ch. xiii; Wallas, Graham, Our 
Social Heritage (New Haven 1921); Dewey, John, 
Human Nature and Conduct (New York 1922). 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



90 

INSTITUTIONS, PUBLIC. Public institu- 
tions care for individuals who are in need of aid 
or treatment and whose disadvantages of condi- 
tion or personality have been accepted as a public 
responsibility. For the destitute, the mentally 
disturbed or incapable, the physically handi- 
capped, the aged, delinquent and dependent 
children, persons accused or found guilty of 
crime, institutional care may seem desirable or 
necessary. 

Institutional care for all these groups, except 
prisoners, owes its rise almost wholly to the 
Christian church. Although it is true that the 
literature of early peoples, notably the Hebrews, 
contains frequent admonitions relative to the 
care of the poor and needy, such provision was 
purely an individual responsibility devolving 
upon the family and friends of the afflicted. In 
the case of the Greeks and Romans provision by 
the state for its destitute took the form of the 
distribution of public largess. Particularly in 
time of famine corn, oil and other commodities 
were given out to the poor, a practise which was 
the precursor of modern "outdoor" relief. 

Nowhere in antiquity, however, is there evi- 
dence of the establishment of large scale institu- 
tions for the sick and the destitute, a develop- 
ment which characterized the Christian church 
from its inception. Xcnodochia, or houses of 
refuge for the accommodation of pilgrims, grew 
up under religious auspices in the East and in 
Italy, and they were followed soon afterward by 
hospitals. The latter, ministering to the aged, 
the widowed and orphaned as well as to the sick 
and disabled, gave rise to the almshouse, the 
most familiar mediaeval institution of charity. 
To the church likewise belongs the credit for the 
first orphan and foundling homes, hospitals for 
lepers and incurables and asylums for the insane. 
In addition to the various ecclesiastical organi- 
zations there were institutions developed by the 
merchant and craft guilds for the relief of distress 
among their own members. 

Out of this religious and secular beneficence 
grew municipal and state care of the poor and 
destitute. Partly because of abuses by the mon- 
asteries and ecclesiastical organizations in the 
exercise of their charitable prerogatives and 
partly because of a desire to share in the revenues 
devoted to philanthropic activities the various 
states in Europe manifested an increasing desire 
during the late Middle Ages to gain control of 
hospitals and almshouses. By the time of the 
Reformation the groundwork of public welfare 
in Europe had been recast, the towns and cities 



having assumed what had always been the func- 
tion of church and guild. 

The notion of government responsibility for 
the problems of poverty, dependence and delin- 
quency has gained especially wide acceptance in 
the Scandinavian nations, where public welfare 
has been the business of the state from the very 
first and where private institutional charity is 
almost non-existent. In Germany after the 
Reformation the parish became a civil unit for 
the purpose of administering relief. At the pres- 
ent time institutional care is extensive and di- 
verse and remains under the administration of 
the government, except for certain ecclesiastical 
institutions, which are, however, subject to state 
supervision. In France the trend from private or 
ecclesiastical to public control of welfare institu- 
tions gained momentum with the advent of the 
revolution when the National Assembly de- 
clared all hospitals and almshouses public prop- 
erty and took over their administration. The 
central commission of bienfaisance created by 
these administrators, although it was but mea- 
gerly effective during most of the nineteenth 
century, was a work destined to last and it fur- 
nishes the impetus for the present system of in- 
stitutional as well as outdoor relief in Paris. In 
all these countries as a rule public institutions 
for charity or correction institutions for the 
criminal, insane and pauper are under the di- 
rection of a central bureau or governing bqard. 

In Soviet Russia relief is based on the prin- 
ciple of state responsibility and of the right of 
all workers to receive assistance from the state 
during illness, infirmity, unemployment, old 
age or any other form of distress. Under the 
auspices of the People's Commissariat of Social 
Relief and the Institute for the Protection of 
Women and Children, sanitoria for the mentally 
and physically handicapped, homes for de- 
serted children and orphans, creches, maternity 
homes and hostels for unmarried or destitute 
mothers and numerous other public institutions 
have been established. Public health occupies a 
central place in the government welfare program 
and all hospitals, clinics and sanitoria have 
been nationalized. These institutions, together 
with the health resorts, spas, rest and vaca- 
tion homes maintained for the benefit of work- 
ers, are administered by the People's Commis- 
sariat of Public Health. The state, however, 
places primary emphasis on pensions and in- 
surance and on the various rehabilitation schemes 
whereby those in need of care are not only 
provided with temporary institutional relief 



Institutions, Public 



but are given treatment and education through 
which they are enabled to resume their normal 
status in society. This prophylactic effort is 
especially apparent in the case of criminals and 
delinquents who, even though they are confined 
in prisons or houses of correction, are given 
every encouragement to mitigate their stay and 
to reestablish themselves as citizens. 

In England as on the continent in the early 
days relief of the poor and dependent was in 
charge of ecclesiastical authorities. With the dis- 
solution of the monasteries by Henry vin, how- 
ever, it became necessary for the state to assume 
the responsibility. Efforts to cope with the 
alarming increase of mendicancy during this 
period culminated in the Poor Law of 1601, 
whifih with its later modifications and revisions 
forms the basis for most public welfare work to- 
day in the United States as well as in England. 

Provision of institutional care for public 
charges in the United States was at first an en- 
tirely local function. It was performed through 
the almshouse, which was established on the 
same principles as the English workhouse. Like 
its English prototype, the almshouse was used 
for all varieties of public charges, except crimi- 
nals, without regard to sex, age, health or habit. 
It harbored paupers and vagabonds, dependent 
children and epileptics, the insane, blind, deaf, 
crippled, diseased and aged. It was a town or 
county institution, almost everywhere mis- 
managed or neglected. Provision for the deten- 
tion and custody of persons accused or found 
guilty of crime was also local and characterized 
by the weaknesses of local administration. Early 
in the nineteenth century, however, as the evils 
of the almshouse system came to be recognized, 
special groups began to be segregated and cared 
for in special state institutions. The sick poor, 
the insane, orphan or deserted children, persons 
charged with crime or already found guilty, came 
increasingly to be considered as state charges 
and as groups with special and varied needs. 

The first state hospital for the insane was that 
authorized by the Virginia legislature in 1769 
and opened in 1773. The principle of state care 
for insane persons whatever their pecuniary 
status has now been adopted in all the states. In 
1798 Kentucky included in a statute containing 
many of the reforms in the criminal law urged 
for thirty years by the great English law reform- 
ers the provision for a state prison, to which 
persons convicted of felonious offenses anywhere 
in the state should be sentenced. Today every 
state has its prison. Early in the nineteenth cen- 



91 

tury private benevolence provided institutions 
for the education of the deaf in Hartford, Con- 
necticut (1817), and in Danville, Kentucky 
(1824); anc * tn eir national significance was held 
to be so great that Congress voted them grants of 
public land to be sold for funds. In the late 
1820*3 and early 1830*3 Samuel Gridley Howe, 
the philanthropist and educator, led the way 
toward provision for the education of the blind 
in Massachusetts and later of the mentally sub- 
normal. His undertakings, like those at Hartford 
and at Danville, were cooperative and public 
funds were paid to private organizations for 
definite services. State institutions for the educa- 
tion of deaf and blind children were soon opened 
elsewhere and today they are found in nearly 
every state. In the west, however, most of them 
have been public from the first. 

It is still a question whether for certain types 
of needy the treatment should be given by the 
local unit or by the state. In Massachusetts state 
as distinguished from local responsibility was 
early recognised in the care of the "unsettled 
poor," and three state almshouses were opened 
in 1854. Also for the group of juvenile offenders, 
or delinquent children as they would be charac- 
terized today, Massachusetts, departing from 
the program of the prison reform group in Eng- 
land, established state institutions, one for boys 
in 1847 and one for girls in 1854. In nearly all 
states, however, the care of the destitute and the 
detention of petty offenders have continued in 
the hands of local authorities; and the almshouse 
and jail remain today as unsolved problems and 
sources of humiliation to local public welfare 
administrations. 

The administrative organization of state insti- 
tutions has shown a certain degree of uniformity 
but also within limits a great diversity. For the 
institutions caring for the mentally and physically 
handicapped, insane, feebleminded, deaf, blind 
or delinquent the pattern in the beginning was 
generally a separate unsalaried board of trustees 
or directors, appointed by the governor or by the 
governor and senate for overlapping terms; the 
board was thus supposed never to be entirely 
renewed at once and was supposed to be assured 
continuity of policy and freedom from partisan 
interference. The members were expected to 
represent the interests of the entire state. Often 
the board was given the power to appoint the 
superintendent and the staff of the institution, 
but sometimes, as in the case of the Massachu- 
setts state almshouses, this power together with 
that of appointing the board itself was vested in 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



92 

the governor. Although in recent years the value 
of these boards has been widely questioned, no 
adequate basis of judgment as to their service- 
ability has been supplied. The problem is so 
complicated, the records kept are so diverse and 
so lacking in comparability that contradictory 
conclusions are urged by equally able and well 
meaning students of the public service. 

The existence of a number of state insti- 
tutions, which operated independently of each 
other, and of variouslocal authorities, whichoften 
overlapped in function, caused inevitably a good 
deal of confusion. In Massachusetts, for example, 
in addition to the local institutions for the relief 
of the destitute and the local law enforcing agen- 
cies there were by 1860 nine state institutions, 
each, as reported by a special joint committee of 
the house and senate in 1859, "created without 
especial reference to others, and in no degree 
as a part of a uniform system," and four others 
that received grants from the legislature. Because 
of the varieties and anomalies in organization 
and the rapid increase in public expenditures for 
state charities, which in Massachusetts had al- 
most quadrupled in twenty years and more than 
doubled in ten years, the establishment of a 
central state board of charities was recommended, 
to which should be given power of visitation, in- 
spection, transfer of patients and general super- 
vision; by the exercise of this power it was hoped 
that some unity, uniformity and economy might 
result. As a result of this recommendation Mas- 
sachusetts created the Board of State Charities in 
1863, thus marking the first state attempt at cen- 
tral supervision. Similar authorities were estab- 
lished in 1867 by Ohio and New York; in 1869 
by Illinois, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and 
Rhode Island; in 1871 by Wisconsin and Michi- 
gan; and in 1873 by Kansas and Connecticut. 

From that time the administration of public 
institutions has been inextricably bound up with 
the problem of the organization of centralized 
state welfare authorities. These authorities in the 
early years were with few exceptions supervisory 
boards, which were generally composed of un- 
salaried members appointed for overlapping 
terms, as in the case of the local boards of trus- 
tees. They were given wide powers of visitation 
and inspection and were called upon to make 
researches into the causes of pauperism and 
crime and to take action leading to greater uni- 
formity of practise as well as to the possible 
adoption of preventive measures and programs; 
but they usually had no direct control in ad- 
ministration, the separate boards of trustees re- 



taining the actual management. In some states, 
however, the boards of trustees were soon re- 
jected. Wisconsin, for example, after a period of 
"supervision" of state institutions by a state 
Board of Charities and Reform, abolished the 
separate boards of trustees in 1881 and trans- 
ferred the administration of those institutions to 
a state administrative board, a plan that was 
later widely followed in other states. In general 
the administrative boards are composed of sala- 
ried members with direct control over the man- 
agement of state institutions. In 1909-1 1 a care- 
ful study was made of the administration of state 
institutions in New York, where there was 
"partial centralization" under three different 
commissions of supervision and control. For 
purposes of comparison the investigator studied 
also the systems in Indiana, where the state cen- 
tral authority merely supervised the boards of 
trustees, and in Iowa, where there had been from 
the time the central authority was set up the 
greatest possible measure of central administra- 
tion. The results seemed to indicate that an in- 
stitution of four hundred or over could be served 
under the Indiana system at least as well as and 
possibly better than under the Iowa system. The 
report recommended state supervision and par- 
tial control and an organization which included 
institutional management by the separate boards 
of trustees (Wright, II. C., Report of an Investi- 
gation of the Methods of Fiscal ControJ. of 
State Institutions in New York, New York 1911). 

In 1917 there was undertaken in Illinois a 
system of one-man supervision and control 
which has had great influence. The entire ad- 
ministration of the state was reorganized and its 
functions were divided among nine (later eleven) 
departments at the head of each of which there 
was a director appointed by the governor. Most 
of the duties and responsibilities connected with 
the administration of the whole system of 
charitable, penal and reformatory institutions 
were assigned to the Department of Public Wel- 
fare. The purchase of supplies and equipment 
and the power to erect or repair buildings were 
vested in the Department of Public Works and 
Buildings, and to the Department of Finance 
were given broad powers of financial and 
budgetary control in all departments. 

Since that time the authorities have been re- 
organized in many states. The administrative 
arrangements for state charitable and correc- 
tional institutions, as they were in 1927, could 
be roughly grouped into five principal types of 
programs: public welfare departments resem- 



Institutions, Public 



bling that of Illinois in the attempt to depart- 
mentalize (California, Colorado, Idaho, Massa- 
chusetts, Michigan, Nebraska, New Jersey, New 
Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wash- 
ington); single authorities in the form of super- 
visory boards (Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Lou- 
isiana, Maine, Maryland, Montana, New Hamp- 
shire, North Carolina); administrative boards, 
either unpaid or ex officio (Connecticut, Florida, 
Kentucky, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Caro- 
lina, Vermont, Virginia, Wyoming); salaried 
boards of control (Alabama, Arizona, Iowa, Kan- 
sas, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, 
Texas, West Virginia, Wisconsin); two or more 
separate authorities (Arkansas, Minnesota, Mis- 
souri, Tennessee). Three states (Mississippi, Ne- 
vada and Utah) have never created any central 
authority. 

Although the movement toward centralization 
has been widespread it has been limited to the 
governmental arrangements of the states, and 
there has been no effective approach toward 
greater uniformity and cooperation between or 
among states or between the central and local 
jurisdictions in the states. There is as yet no 
national system. Such organizations as the Na- 
tional Conference of Social Work, the American 
Prison Association, the National Committee for 
Mental Hygiene, the American Association of 
Public Welfare Officials, have done valuable edu- 
cational work and helped to achieve a unanimity 
of view, promoted national conferences and 
stimulated interest on the part of officials and 
of members of the legislatures, but the results 
are still far short of what could be desired. 

As a consequence of this lack of unified direc- 
tion there remain a number of important ques- 
tions awaiting further agreement. Whether all 
the administrative institutions, penal and chari- 
table, should be centralized in one department, as 
was done in Illinois and later in New Jersey; or 
whether there should be, as in Massachusetts 
and New York, separate departments of mental 
diseases, of corrections and of charities or public 
welfare caring for the destitute separately from 
the other groups, are subjects on which discus- 
sion is by no means closed. All these services 
have certain problems in common, such as the 
provision of shelter, food, clothing and hygienic 
and decent living conditions, and they all need 
similar provision for the investigation and diag- 
nosis of individual requirements. It may well 
be desirable to have a degree of flexibility in 
the use of the different types of institutions. 
It is, nevertheless, equally clear that their spe- 



93 

cfalized tasks vary greatly and call for the serv- 
ices of persons professionally equipped in dif- 
ferent fields: the mental expert, the physician, 
the nurse, the teacher, the prison administrator, 
the dietitian and nutrition worker, the occupa- 
tional therapist and so forth. Another problem 
on which agreement does not exist is the degree 
to which the separate institutions should serve 
the agencies in the local units or should be the 
instrumentalities through which the central au- 
thority secures such treatment as its diagnosis 
would suggest. This is perhaps a wider question 
than that of institutional organization. Shall the 
county authorities commit an insane person to an 
institution or to the department? Shall the 
juvenile court commit a delinquent child to an 
institution or to the department? Shall the 
criminal court sentence a guilty defendant to an 
institution or commit him to an authority? The 
relationship of institutions for the education of 
blind and deaf youth to the central authority in- 
volves another problem of jurisdiction. The 
origin of these in the provision for young persons 
from lower income levels and the fact that relief 
in the form of transportation and clothing is 
provided by public money have led to their being 
included in the general welfare structure. The 
teachers in these institutions, however, have 
frequently urged that they be universally re- 
garded as part of the educational organization. 
Concerning these questions much greater una- 
nimity may be expected in the future. 

At a time when neither domestic nor institu- 
tional management had been placed on a pro- 
fessional basis, when cost accounting had not 
yet been developed, when the budget had yet to 
be accepted as a necessary device and central 
purchasing was an untried experiment, the rapid 
increase in the number of public positions and 
in the amounts of public money to be expended 
resulted in great waste in the use of public re- 
sources and great temptations to the corrupt and 
selfish. The situation was brilliantly and com- 
prehensively summed up by Samuel Gridley 
Howe in 1866 in his first report as chairman of 
the Massachusetts Board of State Charities. 
Since that time the adoption of a budget and 
provision for some form or degree of coopera- 
tion, if not centralized purchasing, have charac- 
terized the development of institutional care in 
all the states. With regard to personnel the use 
of competitive examinations after the pattern set 
by the United States Civil Service Act of 1883 
has been followed in ten states (California, 
Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Massa- 



Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 



94 

chusetts, New Jersey, New York, Ohio and Wis- 
consin). Other states resort to classification 
and to statutory descriptions of required qualifi- 
cations for selected positions. 

The Bureau of the Census has prepared sev- 
eral special reports which provide some illumi- 
nating figures concerning the number of inmates 
and the cost of their care in state institutions. 
Between 1910 and 1923 the number of hospitals 
for mental patients in the United States in- 
creased from 366 to 526. In the former year 
there were 143 state hospitals caring for 159,096 
patients; in the latter, 165 caring for 229,837. 
Of the patients in these hospitals 34.2 percent, 
or more than one third, had passed ten years or 
more in such an institution, and 13 percent 
twenty years or more. In 1922 with an average 
daily patient population of 225,685 the per capita 
cost for maintenance in 153 mental hospitals was 
$282.13 a year. The corresponding figures for 
1928 for 159 hospitals were an average daily 
patient population of 264,484 and a per capita 
cost for maintenance of about $309. If the costs 
for the services of the 23,788 nurses and attend- 
ants, 1223 physicians, 670 occupational thera- 
pists and 153 social workers be included, the 
to