Skip to main content

Full text of "Entomological news"

See other formats


JANUARY  &  FEBRUARY  2004 


USISSN  0013-872X 
No.  1 


NTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


nomic  status  of  the  Australian  mayfly  genera  Jappa  and  Ulmerophlebia 
1^-^    phemeroptera:  Leptophlebiidae)  K  J.  Bae,  K.  J.  Finlay,  and  I.  C.  Campbell       1 

A  new  species  of  Platycephala  from  China  (Diptera:  Chloropidae:  Chloropinae) 

Shu  wen  An  and  Ding  Yang      11 

Review  of  the  Neotropical  genus  Trachelium  Herrich-Schaeffer,  with  the 
description  of  six  new  species  (Heteroptyera:  Alydidae:  Micrelytrinae: 
Micrelytrini)  Harry  Brailovsky  15 

Redescription  of  Nothobrya  schubarti  Arle,  1961  (Collembola, 
Entomobryomorpha) 

Enrique  Baquero,  Rafael  Jordana,  and  Kenneth  Christiansen      31 

Two  new  species  of  Hercostom us  from  China  (Diptera:  Dolichopodidae) 

Lili  Zhang,  Ding  Yang,  and  Kazuhiro  Masunaga     35 

The  female  of  Tenuiphantes  cracens  (Araneae:  Linyphiidae)  from 

Newfoundland,  Canada  J.  R.  Pickavance     44 

A  long-lasting  method  for  marking  beetles  (Coleoptera),  which  does  not  enhance 
mortality  A.  J.  Bates  and  J. P.  Sadler     49 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTES: 

Attendance  of  Aetalion  reticulatum  (Hemiptera:  Aetalionidae)  by  Polistes 
erythrocephalus  (Hymenoptera:  Vespidae)  in  Peru 

M.  A.  MacCarroll  and  W.  K.  Reeves      52 

First  record  of  Sticthippus  californicus  (Orthoptera:  Acrididae)  outside 

California,  U.S.A.  Thomas  A.  Stidham      54 

Insect  meals  from  a  leptodactylid  frog  (Amphibia:  Leptodactyidae)  !: 

Dominican  amber  (Miocene,  23  Ma)  Scott  R.  An,  'erson      55 

BOOK  REVIEW: 

Early  American  Naturalists.  Exploring  the  American  West  1804-1900 

by  J.  Moring  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay     58 

Night  Visions.  The  Secret  Designs  of  Moths  by  Joseph  Scheer 

Katherine  Marie  Schuler     59 

Bugs  Before  Time:  Prehistoric  Insects  and  Their  Relatives  by  Cathy  Camper 

Suzanne  Mc/ntire      60 


SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  FEBRUARY  24,  2004 


Jon  Gelhaus 

Back  Cover 


THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

MAILED  ON  NOVEMBER  12,  2004 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS,  THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY, 
AND  NEW  GUIDELINES  FOR  AUTHORS  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 

Entomological  News  is  published  bimonthly  except  July- August  by  The  American  Entomological 
Society,  which  is  headquartered  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  1900  Benjamin  Franklin 
Parkway,  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195  United  States  of  America.  AES  can  be  reached,  as  follows: 
telephone  (215)  561-3978;  fax  (215)  299-1028;  e-mail,  aes@acnatsci.org  and  website:  http://www. 
acnatsci  .org/hosted/aes . 

Subscriptions  to  and  Back  Issues  of  Entomological  News.  Private  subscriptions  for  personal 
use  of  members  of  the  society  are  US  $15  per  year  prepaid.  Subscriptions  for  institutions,  such  as 
libraries,  laboratories,  etc.  and  nonmembers,  are  US$30  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  in  the  USA 
and  US  $34  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  outside  the  USA.  Back  issues  when  available  are  sold 
by  complete  volume,  for  US  $15  to  members,  and  US  $30  to  nonmembers.  Membership  /  sub- 
scription application  and  additional  information  is  available  at:  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/ 
subscription.html.  Please  send  inquiries  or  send  completed  membership  form  to:  Office  Manager  at 
the  address  above,  e-mail:  aes@say.acnatsci.org,  or  call  (215)  561-3978. 

Previous  editors  of  Entomological  News:  1890  Eugene  Murray-Aaron  (1852-1940);  1890-1920 
Henry  Skinner  (186 1-1926);  1921-1944  Philip  P.  Calvert  (1871-  1961);  1945-1967  R.G.  Schmieder 
(1898-1967);  1968-1972  Ross  H.Arnett,  Jr.  (1919-1999);  1973-1974  R.W.  Lake;  1974-2002  Howard 
P.  Boyd;  2002-2003  F.  Christian  Thompson  and  Michael  Pogue. 

New  Guidelines  for  authors  of  Entomological  News: 

Further  guidelines  can  be  found  on 
http://www.geocities.com/entoniologicalnews/instructions.htni 

Subject  Coverage:  Entomology,  sensu  lato.  Manuscripts  on  systematics,  ecology,  evolution, 
morphology,  physiology,  behavior,  biodiversity,  conservation,  paleobiology,  and  other  aspects  of 
insect  and  terrestrial  arthropod  life  as  well  as  nomenclature,  biographies  and  history  of  entomology, 
among  others,  are  appropriate  topics  for  papers  submitted  to  Entomological  News.  Papers  on  applied, 
economic,  and  regulatory  entomology  or  on  toxicology  and  related  subjects  will  be  considered  only 
if  they  also  make  a  major  contribution  in  one  of  the  aforementioned  fields. 

Any  author  may  submit  papers.  Manuscripts  will  be  accepted  from  any  author,  although, 
papers  from  members  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  are  given  priority.  It  is  suggested  that 
all  prospective  authors  join  the  AES. 

Send  manuscripts,  books  for  review,  and  editorial  correspondence  to  the  editor.  All  manu- 
scripts, including  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews,  submitted  for  publication  in  Entomological  News 
as  well  as  all  associated  editorial  communications  must  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay 
at  this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC- 121,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smith- 
sonian Institution,  P.  O.  Box  37:)!?.  Washington,  D.C.  20013-7012  U.S.A.  If  an  author  uses  a  mail- 
ing service  that  does  not  accept  addresses  with  a  P.  O.  Box,  please  use  this  address:  Department  of 
Paleobiology,  MRC  121 ,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  West  Load- 
ing Dock,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  Other  means  of  contacting  the  Editor  are, 
as  follows:  Phone:  (202)  633-1383,  Fax:  (202)  786-2832,  e-mails:  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu,  or 
blayj@hotmail.com,  or  via  the  webpage  at  http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/contact. 
htm.  Books  for  review  should  also  be  sent  to  the  editor  who  will,  in  turn,  give  them  to  a  colleague 
for  review. 

Agreement.  By  submitting  a  paper  for  publication,  authors  tacitly  agree  to  not  submit  in  parallel 
the  same  manuscript  to  another  journal.  For  published  papers,  authors  agree  to  accept  responsibility 
for  all  page,  illustration,  and  requested  reprint  charges.  Rejected  manuscripts  will  be  discarded,  ex- 
cept for  original  artwork  and  photographs,  which  will  be  returned  to  the  authors. 

Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews.  These  are  much  shorter  contributions,  typically  not  exceed- 
ing two,printed  pages.  The  main  difference  between  these  types  of  contributions  and  longer  papers  is 
that  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews  lack  an  abstract  and  most  of  the  main  headings,  except  for  the 
acknowledgments  and  the  literature  cited  sections. 

Postmaster:  If  undeliverable,  please  send  to 

The  American  Entomological  Society  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Eranklin  Parkway  /  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

THIRD  CLASS  POSTAGE  PAID  AT  DOVER,  DELAWARE  19901  U.S.A. 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 


TAXONOMIC  STATUS  OF  THE  AUSTRALIAN 

MAYFLY  GENERA  JAPPA  AND  ULMEROPHLEBIA 

(EPHEMEROPTERA:  LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE)1 

Y.  J.  Bae,:  K.  J.  Finlay,'  and  I.  C.  Campbell3 

ABSTRACT:  The  Australian  burrowing  mayfly  genera  Jappa  and  Ulmerophlebia  are  confirmed  as 
monophyletic  groups.  Their  adult  and  larval  stages  are  redescribed  and  their  egg  stages  are  newly 
described.  Additional  taxonomic  and  phylogenetic  discussions  are  provided. 

KEYWORDS:   Ephemeroptera,  Letophlebiidae,  Jappa,  Ulmerophlebia,  Australia. 

The  Australian  mayfly  genera  Jappa  Marker  and  Ulmerophlebia  Demoulin 
(Leptophlebiidae)  are  unique  among  Ephemeroptera  because  of  the  convergent 
adaptation  with  the  burrowing  mayflies  (Ephemeroidea)  from  the  Northern  Hem- 
isphere (Campbell,  1990;  Bae  and  McCafferty,  1991,  1995).  Members  of  the 
Ephemeroidea  do  not  occur  in  Australia,  and  these  are  the  genera  of  Ephemer- 
optera most  closely  adapted  to  hyporheic  habitats  in  Australia.  The  larvae  are 
generally  found  under  cobble-  or  boulder-sized  stones  embedded  in  sand  and  silt 
substrate  in  mid-sized  to  large  lowland  streams  (Riek,  1970;  Peters  and  Camp- 
bell, 1991;  Edmunds  and  McCafferty,  1996). 

The  larvae  of  Jappa  possess  a  characteristic  head  with  a  two-pronged  frontal 
process  or  "cephalic  tusks"  (Fig.  1 )  that  is  analogous  to  the  mandibular  tusks  of 
Ephemeroidea,  in  particular  those  of  Potamanthidae  (see  Bae  and  McCafferty, 
1991:  Figs.  11-14),  while  the  larvae  of  Ulmerophlebia  lack  such  structure  (Fig. 
2).  Despite  this  morphological  difference,  the  generic  distinction  of  the  genera 
has  been  continuously  questioned  by  mayfly  taxonomists  not  only  because  their 
general  morphology  in  adult  and  larval  stages  is  similar,  but  because  generic  con- 
cepts have  not  been  well  defined. 

Harker  ( 1 954)  established  the  genus  Jappa  based  on  adult  and  larval  stages. 
At  that  time,  forewing  length  to  width  ratio  and  "a  burrowing  type  larva"  with 
tusk-like  head  frontal  processes  or  "horns"  were  used  as  the  major  defining  char- 
acteristics. Demoulin  (1955)  erected  the  genus  Ulmerophlebia  to  include  a  spec- 
ies, Euphyurus  mjobergi  Ulmer,  described  (as  an  adult  only)  by  Ulmer  (1916), 
but  did  not  compare  it  with  Jappa.  Previously,  Ulmer  (1920)  recombined  E. 
mjobergi  with  Deleatidium  Eaton;  and  Demoulin  (1955)  distingui 
phlebia  from  Deleatidium  mainly  by  wing  and  genitaLdiajjflttvrs. 


1  Received  on  June  27,  2002.  Accepted  on  May  18,  2004. 

Department  of  Biology,  Seoul  Women's  University,  Seoul 

ac.kr. 

'School  of  Biological  Sciences,  Monash  University,  Melbourne,  Victoria  3800,  Australia.  E-mail: 
ian. campbell(« 'sci.monash.edu.au. 

ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  115(1):  1 .  January  &  February  2004 
Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figs.  1-2.  Larval  head: 
=  0.5mm). 


I.  Jappa  kutera  (bar  =  0.5mm).  2.  Ulmerophlebia  mjobergi  (bar 


Williams  (1968)  mentioned  a  possible  congeneric  status  of  Jappa  and  Ulmero- 
phlebia based  on  personal  communication  with  E.  F.  Riek.  Riek  (1970),  in  the 
Ephemeroptera  chapter  of  the  textbook  'The  Insects  of  Australia,"  placed  all  bur- 
rowing Australian  leptophlebiids,  i.e.  Jappa  and  Ulmerophlebia,  into  Jappa 
without  any  explanations.  Peters  and  Campbell  (1991)  also  followed  the  previ- 
ous classification  by  Riek  (1970)  in  the  second  edition  of  the  textbook.  Suter 
(1986)  provided  a  historical  background  of  Ulmerophlebia  and  described  the  lar- 
val stage  of  Ulmerophlebia  for  the  first  time  based  on  a  second  species,  U.  pip- 
inna  Suter,  but  was  conservative  in  clarifying  the  generic  status  of  the  Ulmero- 
phlebia and  Jappa.  Dean  (1999)  gave  larval  diagnoses  of  Jappa  and  Ulmerophle- 
bia when  he  provided  larval  keys  to  three  nominal  and  four  unnamed  species  of 
Jappa  and  four  unnamed  species  of  Ulmerophlebia,  but  still  did  not  resolve  the 
generic  status. 

For  the  above  reasons,  the  generic  concepts  of  Jappa  and  Ulmerophlebia  have 
not  been  fully  resolved.  The  purpose  of  this  study  is  to  clarify  and  delineate  the 
genera  and  provide  detailed  redescriptions  of  adult,  larval,  and  egg  stages. 

Type  and  voucher  specimens  and  additional  fresh  materials  of  all  previously 
known  species  of  Jappa  and  Ulmerophlebia  (see  Species  included,  pp.  5,  7)  are 
housed  mainly  in  the  Museum  of  Victoria,  Australian  National  Insect  Collection 
in  Canberra,  and  Monash  University  and  were  examined  for  this  study.  Termi- 
nology, measurement,  and  other  general  methods  are  after  Bae  and  McCafferty 
(1991). 


Vol.  11 5,  No.  1,  January  &  February  2004 


Jappa  Marker 

Jappa  Marker,  1954:  257  [Type  species:  Jappa  kulera  Marker,  by  original  designation;  M  &  L]; 
Williams,  1968:  170  (L  key);  Dean  and  Suter,  1996:  44  (L);  Dean,  1999:  34  (L). 

Adult.  Male  body  length  9.4-11.3  mm;  female  body  12.0-16.5  mm;  caudal  filaments  14.0-19.1 
mm.  General  body  color  light  yellow  with  dark  purplish  brown  markings.  Head:  Male  dorsal  com- 
pound eyes  1.10-1.43  mm  in  length,  1.00-1.19  mm  in  width,  0.48-0.68  mm  in  height,  broadly  meet- 
ing posteromedially  (B/D  =  0),  dome-shaped,  dorsally  oval,  and  with  anterior  margin  round  and  pos- 
terior margin  somewhat  attenuating  from  lateral  view  ("bicycle  helmet"  shaped);  basal  compound 
eyes  anteroventrally  pronounced,  invisible  to  slightly  visible  from  dorsal  view,  0.67-0.87  mm  in 
length,  0.43-0.58  mm  in  height,  and  anteriorly  oriented  from  lateral  view.  Female  compound  eyes 
0.33-0.47  mm  in  width  and  1.53-  1.67  mm  in  distance  between  compound  eyes  (B/D  =  3.50-4.70). 
Thorax:  Forewings  transparent,  often  with  dark  purplish  brown  markings  at  basal,  central,  and  api- 
cal areas,  8.8-15.6  mm  in  length,  and  2.9-5.3  mm  in  width;  longitudinal  veins  light  brown  to  dark 
purplish  brown;  crossveins  light  brown  to  dark  purplish  brown  (basally  and  anteriorly  located 
crossveins  often  darker  and  more  heavily  infuscated);  crossveins  C-Sc  20-30,  Sc-Rl  16-20,  and  Rl- 
R2  13-15  in  number;  crossveins  in  stigmatic  area  not  anastomosed;  MP2  basally  connected  to  MP1 
and  CuA;  ICul  basally  connected  to  CuA  and  CuP  (angle  between  ICul  and  crossvein  ICul-CuP 
larger  than  angle  between  ICul  and  crossvein  ICul -CuA).  Hindwings  transparent,  2.3-2.9  mm  in 
length,  and  1.2-1.4  mm  in  width;  longitudinal  veins  white  to  light  yellow;  crossveins  C-Sc,  Sc-Rl, 
and  some  in  distal  part  sometimes  dark  brown;  Sc  ending  relatively  distally  (length  of  Sc  /  distance 
from  base  of  Sc  to  apex  of  distal  margin  =  0.89);  crossveins  C-Sc  9-11,  more  or  less  evenly  distrib- 
uted (in  one  species,  C-Sc  crossveins  apically  concentrated);  costal  margin  round,  with  weakly  devel- 
oped costal  projection  at  midlength;  Rs  0.48-0.68  mm;  Rl  0.64-0.98  mm;  MPs  0.25-0.48  mm;  MP1 
1.11-1.37  mm.  Male  forefemora  2.10-2.27  mm,  foretibiae  2.90-3.25  mm,  foretarsal  segments  1,  2,  3, 
4,  and  5  0.13-0.14  mm,  1.08-1.27  mm,  1.00-1.18  mm,  0.76-0.89  mm,  and  0.38-0.44  mm  (foretarsal 
segment  2>3>4>  5>1),  and  foreclaws  0.15-0.24  mm.  Female  foretibiae>forefemora>foretarsi.  Claws 
dissimilar.  Abdomen:  Abdominal  segment  9  with  moderately  to  well  developed  posterolateral  pro- 
jections. Penes  Y-shaped  or  V-shaped,  relatively  long  (height  of  penis  /  height  of  forceps  segment  1 
=  0.45-0.56);  forceps  3-segmented,  with  segment  1  0.92-1.03  mm,  segment  2  0.10-0.13  mm,  and  seg- 
ment 3  0.08-0.12  mm  in  length;  forceps  segment  1  basally  broad  and  apically  slender,  with  relative- 
ly abrupt  constriction  (constriction  angle  80-1 10°)  at  mid-length  to  3/4  apically;  forceps  segments  2 
and  3  often  indistinctly  demarcated.  Caudal  filaments  light  yellow,  often  with  purplish  brown  to  dark 
brown  stripes,  often  with  maculation  at  joints;  cerci  1.3-1. 7x  length  of  body;  terminal  filament  as 
long  as  cerci. 

Larva.  Male  body  length  10.4-16.9  mm;  cephalic  tusks  1.0-2.0  mm;  caudal  filaments  5.9-10.9 
mm.  Female  body  length  10.4-23.8  mm;  cephalic  rusks  1.4-3.5  mm;  caudal  filaments  5.9-18.1  mm. 
Body  surface  glassy  and  heavily  setose.  General  body  color  light  yellow  to  light  brown  with  dark  pur- 
plish brown  markings.  Head:  Head  (Fig.  1 )  1 .30-2.38  mm  in  length  and  1 .75-4. 1 3  mm  in  width.  Male 
compound  eyes  dorsally  0.56-0.60  mm  in  width  and  0.65-1.06  mm  in  distance  between  compound 
eyes  (B/D  =  1.08-1.76).  Female  compound  eyes  dorsally  0.23-0.56  mm  in  width  and  1.38-2.86  mm 
in  distance  between  compound  eyes  (B/D  =  4.75-6.1 1 ).  Antennae  4.4-6.3  mm  in  length,  with  whorls 
of  hairlike  setae  at  each  segment.  Cephalic  tusks  arched  and  attenuating,  apically  convergent  and 
upward,  1.32-2.30  mm  in  inner  length  and  1.58-2.88  mm  in  outer  length,  14.9-26.5°  in  curvature; 
each  cephalic  tusk  with  rudimentary  to  distinct  dorsal  ridge,  with  small  to  large  basodorsal  tubercle, 
with  fields  of  6-20,  5-15,  and  10-20  hairlike  setae  at  basomedial,  basosublateral,  and  apicodorsal 
areas  (in  two  species  apicodorsal  setal  field  lacking),  respectively,  sometimes  with  lateral  row  of  1-4 
spines  (in  one  species  lateral  spine  single  and  prominent),  and  sometimes  with  additional  dorsolater- 
al  row  of  6-13  spines.  Labrum  distally  wider  (maximum  length  0.30-0.38  mm;  basal  width  0.59-0. X7 
mm;  distal  maximum  width  0.75-1.06  mm);  dorsal  surface  heavily  setose,  with  basal  and  subapical 
hairlike  setal  fringes  (basal  setae  longer  than  subapical  setae);  subapical  setal  fringe  laterally  longer 
and  8-15  setae  densely  arranged  medially;  anterior  and  lateral  margins  with  hairlike  setal  rou;  ante- 
rior margin  concave,  with  prominent  median  tubercle,  and  with  three  pairs  of  rudimentary  submedi- 
an  denticles;  ventral  surface  with  dense  hairlike  setal  field  along  anterior  margin,  with  row  of  10-20 
stout  setae  on  subanterior  margins,  and  with  fields  of  20-50  hairlike  setae  at  submedian  areas. 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Mandible  dorsolateral  margins  with  very  long  hairlike  setal  row;  ventral  surface  with  transverse  row 
of  10-20  hairlike  setae;  inner  incisors  slightly  smaller  to  as  large  as  outer  incisors;  incisors  with  2-3 
apical  teeth  and  0-4  lateral  denticles;  prostheca  rudimentary,  with  well-developed  fringe.  Hypo- 
pharynx  superlinguae  laterally  curved  and  apically  pointed.  Maxillae  with  dense  hairlike  setal  field 
medially  3/4  on  galealacinial  crown,  mixed  with  rowed  comblike  setae  medially  1/2  on  galealacinial 
crown,  with  one  pronounced  comblike  seta  medioapically,  and  with  rowed  dense  hairlike  setae  on 
medial  margin;  maxillary  palp  segment  1  0.27-0.52  mm,  segment  2  0.37-0.48  mm,  and  segment  3 
0.19-0.37  mm  in  length;  segment  1  and  2  with  sparse  hairlike  setae  alone  outer  margin;  segment  3 
indistinctly  demarcated  from  segment  2,  with  pronounced  outer  margin,  and  with  strongly  developed 
setal  field  along  outer  margin.  Labial  glossae  dorsoventrally  elongated  and  ventrally  stalked,  with 
dense  hairlike  setae;  paraglossae  with  dense  hairlike  setal  field  dorsoapically;  labial  palp  segment  1 
0.28-0.59  mm,  segment  2  0.31-0.40  mm,  and  segment  3  0.22-0.32  mm  in  length;  segment  3  indis- 
tinctly demarcated  from  segment  2,  apically  pointed,  with  dense  hairlike  setal  field  along  outer  mar- 
gin, and  with  stout  setal  row  along  inner  margin.  Thorax:  Pronotum  anterolateral  margins  round;  lat- 
eral margins  with  row  of  sparse  to  dense  hairlike  setae.  Forefemora  1.67-4.88  mm,  foretibiae  1.67- 
5.63  mm,  foretarsi  0.71-1.63  mm,  and  foreclaws  0.24-0.63  mm  in  length  ( foretibiae>forefemora> 
foretarsi>foreclaws);  forefemora  with  long  hairlike  setal  fields  along  anterior  and  posterior  margins 
and  basomedial  area  on  dorsal  surface;  foretibiae  with  dense  hairlike  setal  field  (filtering  setae)  rowed 
along  inner  and  outer  margins  (dorsomedially  bare),  with  stout  setal  field  (raking  setae)  on  2/3  api- 
cal to  entire  inner  margin;  foretarsi  with  dense  hairlike  setae  on  dorsal  and  lateral  surfaces;  foreclaws 
apically  darker,  with  10-15  tiny  teeth  3/4  basally.  Midlegs  and  hindlegs  heavily  setose;  length  femo- 
ra>tibiae>tarsi>claws.  Abdomen:  Terga  light  brown  to  light  purplish  brown,  mostly  with  submedian 
and  sublateral  dark  purplish  brown  stripes,  with  very  long  hairlike  setae  covered  on  1/2-3/4  dorsal 
area  along  median  line,  and  with  hairlike  setal  row  along  lateral  margins;  abdominal  segment  8-9 
with  moderately  to  well  developed  posterolateral  projections.  Sterna  bare  (sterna  9-10  sometimes 
with  hairlike  setae).  Gills  on  abdominal  segment  1-7,  double;  both  lamellae  with  indistinct  to  distinct 


Figs.  3-6.  Eggs:  3.  Jappa  kutera  (bar  =  38|im).  4. ./.  kiitcra.  in  part  (bar  =  lO^un). 
5.  Uhnerophlebia  mjobergi  (bar  =  43nm).  6.  U.  mjobergi,  in  part  (bar  =  17.6[.im). 


Vol.  115,  No.  1,  January  &  February  2004 


tracheae,  with  single  apical  filament;  gill  lamella  inner  part  strongly  expanded  apicolaterally,  and 
with  fine  setae  on  1/5-1/2  apical  margin;  gill  lamella  outer  part  with  fine  setae  on  entire  margin;  api- 
cal filament  attenuating,  marginally  with  fine  setae;  gills  4  1.38-2.86  mm  in  length,  0.78-1.83  mm  in 
width,  and  1.38-2.38  mm  in  filament  length,  with  weakly  to  strongly  developed  apical  expansion. 
Caudal  filament  segments  with  whorls  of  setae. 

Egg.  Egg  (Fig.  3)  oval;  long  axis  124  |.im;  short  axis  80  mm.  Color  light  yellow  in  nature,  white 
in  alcohol.  Egg  surface  (Fig.  4)  with  ca.  780  knob-terminated  coiled  threads  relatively  evenly  dis- 
tributed throughout  egg  surface;  diameter  of  knob-terminated  coiled  threads  3.9-4.5  mm.  Polar  caps 
absent.  Micropyles  several,  scattered,  tagcnoform;  sperm  guide  circular,  2.6-3.3  \im  in  diameter. 

Diagnosis.  Adults  of  Jappa  possess  greater  numbers  of  C-Sc  crossveins  (20- 
30)  in  the  forewings  and  more  or  less  evenly  distributed  C-Sc  crossveins  in  the 
hindwings  (excluding  one  species),  while  those  of  Vlmerophlebia  possess  fewer 
C-Sc  crossveins  (12-19)  in  the  forewings  and  apically  concentrated  C-Sc  cross- 
veins  in  the  hindwings.  The  hindwing  vein  Sc  of  Jappa  ends  relatively  distally 
(length  of  Sc  /  distance  from  base  of  Sc  to  apex  of  distal  margin  =  0.89)  com- 
paring with  that  of  Ulmerophlebia  (0.76).  The  penes  of  Jappa  are  relatively  long- 
er (height  of  penis  /  height  of  forceps  segment  1  =  0.45-0.56)  than  those  of  Ul- 
merophlebia (0.08-0.31).  The  constriction  in  the  medial  margin  of  forceps  seg- 
ment 1  of  Jappa  is  relatively  abrupt  (angle  80-1 10°),  while  that  of  Ulmerophlebia 
is  relatively  gradual  (angle  135-150°).  The  larvae  of  Jappa  can  easily  be  distin- 
guished from  those  of  Ulmerophlebia  and  any  other  leptophlebiid  genera  by  the 
cephalic  tusks  (Fig.  1).  In  addition,  the  body  size  of  Jappa  in  both  of  the  adults 
and  larvae  (adult  9.4-16.5  mm,  larva  10.4-23.8  mm)  is  generally  larger  than  that 
of  Ulmerophlebia  (adult  6.9-8.7  mm,  larva  5.5-10.0  mm). 

Species  included.  Jappa  kutera  Marker  (1954),  J.  edmundsi  Skedros  and 
Polhemus  (1986),  J.  serrata  Skedros  and  Polhemus  (1986),  Jappa  AVI  (Dean, 
1999),  Jappa  AV2  (Dean,  1999),  Jappa  AV3  (Dean,  1999),  and  Jappa  AV4 
(Dean,  1999). 

Distribution.  NSW,  NT,  northern  WA,  QLD,  and  VIC. 

Remarks.  There  are  several  other  species  previously  considered  as,  or 
assigned  to,  Jappa.  Jappa  tristis  Marker  (1954)  [Holotype  stage:  M;  locality:  Tas- 
mania, Cradle  Mt.;  deposition:  British  Museum  (Natural  History)]  was  subse- 
quently identified  as  Jillyardophlebia  Dean  by  Dean  (1999).  Jappa  is  not  con- 
sidered present  in  Tasmania. 

Leptophlebia  furcifera  Eaton  (1871)  [Type  stage:  M;  locality:  Melbourne;  de- 
position: Melbourne  Museum  =  Museum  of  Victoria],  recombined  with  Atalo- 
phlebia  Eaton  by  Eaton  (1884),  was  considered  in  Jappa  by  Dean  (1999).  How- 
ever, the  type  specimen  was  not  preserved  in  the  Museum  of  Victoria  when  YJB 
checked  in  2001  and  there  is  little  evidence  that  this  species  belongs  to  Jappa 
based  on  Eaton's  original  description  (Eaton,  1871)  and  redescription  (Eaton, 
1884). 

Leptophlebia  strigata  Eaton  (1871)  [Type  stage:  F;  locality:  North  Australia; 
deposition:  McLachlan  Collection  in  British  Museum  (Natural  History)],  recom- 
bined with  Atalophlebia  by  Eaton  ( 1 884)  and  Dclcatnliuni  by  Uhner  ( 1 920),  was 
also  considered  in  Jappa  by  Dean  ( 1 999).  The  original  description  (Eaton,  1871) 
and  redescription  (Eaton,  1884)  of  the  species  do  not  clearly  substantiate  the 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


generic  position,  and  it  is  crucial  that  the  types  be  reexamined  before  generic 
placement  can  be  confirmed. 

Ulmerophlebia  Demoulin 

Ulmerophlebia  Demoulin,  1955:  228  [Type  species:  Euphyurus  mjobergi  Ulrner,  by  original  desig- 
nation; A];  Suter,  1986:  352  [M  &  L];  Dean  and  Suter,  1996:  44  [L];  Dean,  1999:  74  [L]. 

Adult.  Male  body  length  6.9-8.7  mm;  female  body  6.3-8.6  mm;  caudal  filaments  7.5-9.5  mm. 
General  body  color  light  yellow  with  dark  purplish  brown  markings.  Head:  Male  dorsal  compound 
eyes  0.92-0.98  mm  in  length,  0.78-0.87  mm  in  width,  0.44-0.56  mm  in  height,  0-0.05  mm  in  distance 
between  compound  eyes  (B/D  =  0-0.06),  dome-shaped,  dorsally  oval,  and  with  anterior  margin  round 
and  posterior  margin  somewhat  attenuating  from  lateral  view  ("bicycle  helmet"  shaped);  basal  com- 
pound eyes  anteroventrally  pronounced,  invisible  to  slightly  visible  from  dorsal  view,  0.52-0.66  mm 
in  length,  0.29-0.36  mm  in  height,  and  anteriorly  oriented  from  lateral  view.  Female  compound  eyes 
0.22-0.29  mm  in  width,  and  0.83-1.03  mm  in  distance  between  compound  eyes  (B/D  =  3.11-4.91). 
Thorax:  Forewings  transparent,  often  with  dark  purplish  brown  markings  at  basal,  central,  and  api- 
cal areas,  6.6-8.5  mm  in  length,  and  2.2-3.2  mm  in  width;  longitudinal  veins  light  brown  to  dark  pur- 
plish brown;  crossveins  light  brown  to  dark  purplish  brown  (basally  and  anteriorly  located  crossveins 
often  darker  and  more  heavily  infuscated);  crossveins  C-Sc  12-19,  Sc-R  1  12-16,  and  R 1 -R2  1 0- 1 4  in 
number;  crossveins  in  stigmatic  area  not  anastomosed;  MP2  basally  connected  to  MP1  and  CuA; 
ICul  basally  connected  to  CuA  and  CuP  (angle  between  ICul  and  crossvein  ICul-CuP  larger  than 
angle  between  ICul  and  crossvein  ICul-CuA).  Hindwings  transparent,  1.3-1.9  mm  in  length,  and 
0.7-1.0  mm  in  width;  longitudinal  veins  white  to  light  yellow;  crossveins  C-Sc,  Sc-Rl,  and  some  in 
distal  part  sometimes  dark  brown;  Sc  ending  relatively  proximally  (length  of  Sc  /  distance  from  base 
of  Sc  to  apex  of  distal  margin  =  0.76);  crossveins  C-Sc  4-10,  apically  concentrated;  costal  margin 
round,  with  weakly  developed  costal  projection  at  1/3  basally  to  midlength;  Rs  0.27-0.40  mm;  Rl 
0.56-0.75  mm;  MPs  0.20-0.31  mm;  MP1  0.47-1.06  mm.  Male  forefemora  0.45-1.67  mm,  foretibiae 
2.22-2.83  mm,  foretalsal  segments  1,  2,  3,  4,  and  5  0.10-0.13  mm,  0.68-0.97  mm,  0.70-0.93  mm, 
0.55-0.70  mm,  and  0.25-0.30  mm  (foretarsal  segment  2>3>4>5>1),  and  foreclaws  0.13-0.15  mm. 
Female  foretibiae>  forefemora>foretarsi.  Claws  dissimilar.  Abdomen:  Abdominal  segment  9  with 
moderately  to  well  developed  posterolateral  projections.  Penes  Y-shaped  or  V-shaped,  relatively  short 
or  rudimentary  (height  of  penis  /  height  of  forceps  segment  1  =  0.08-0.3 1 );  forceps  3-segmented,  with 
segment  1  0.63-0.68  mm,  segment  2  0.06-0.09  mm,  and  segment  3  0.06-0.08  mm  in  length;  forceps 
segment  1  basally  broad  and  apically  slender  with  relatively  gradual  constriction  (constriction  angle 
>  135-150°)  at  midlength  to  2/3  apically;  forceps  segments  2  and  3  often  indistinctly  demarcated. 
Caudal  filaments  light  yellow,  often  with  purplish  brown  to  dark  brown  stripes,  often  with  macula- 
tion  at  joints;  cerci  l.l-1.7x  length  of  body;  terminal  filament  as  long  as  or  slightly  longer  than  cerci. 

Larva.  Male  body  length  6.2-9.8  mm;  caudal  filaments  5.5-10.0  mm.  Female  body  length  6.8- 
1 1.2  mm;  caudal  filaments  6.3-13.2  mm.  Body  surface  glassy  and  relatively  less  setose.  General  body 
color  light  yellow  to  light  brown  with  dark  purplish  brown  markings.  Head:  Head  (Fig.  2)  light 
brown,  1.27-1.40  mm  in  length  and  1.59-1.75  mm  in  width.  Male  compound  eyes  dorsally  0.48-0.58 
mm  in  width  and  0.43-0.56  mm  in  distance  between  compound  eyes  (B/D  =  0.74-1.10).  Female  com- 
pound eyes  dorsally  0.20-0.24  mm  in  width  and  1.10-1.35  mm  in  distance  between  compound  eyes 
(B/D  =  4.67-6.00).  Antennae  4.0  mm  in  length,  with  whorls  of  hairlike  setae  at  each  segment. 
Cephalic  tusks  absent.  Clypeus  greatly  developed,  0.38-0.45  mm  in  length,  0.68-0.90  mm  in  basal 
width,  0.64-0.83  mm  in  apical  width,  with  pronounced  sublateral  tubercles,  and  with  fields  of  8-10 
hairlike  setae  subapicolaterally  and  4-15  hairlike  setae  subbasolaterally.  Labrum  slightly  narrower 
than  clypeus  (0.92x  width  of  clypeus),  slightly  wider  distally  (maximum  length  0.28  mm;  basal  width 
0.56  mm;  distal  maximum  width  0.60  mm);  dorsal  surface  moderately  setose,  with  basal  and  sub- 
apical  hairlike  setal  fringes  (basal  setae  as  long  as  subapical  setae);  subapical  setal  fringe  laterally 
longer  (setae  curved  forward)  and  without  dense  arrangement;  anterior  and  lateral  margins  with  dense 
hairlike  setal  row;  anterior  margin  slightly  concave,  with  prominent  median  tubercle,  and  with  three 
pairs  of  rudimentary  submedian  denticles;  ventral  surface  with  dense  hairlike  setal  field  along  ante- 
rior margin,  with  row  of  15-18  stout  setae  on  subanterior  margins,  and  with  fields  of  10-15  hairlike 
setae  at  submedian  areas.  Mandible  dorsolateral  margins  with  very  long  hairlike  setal  row;  ventral 
surface  without  setal  row;  inner  incisors  slightly  smaller  to  as  large  as  outer  incisors;  incisors  with  2- 


Vol.  1 15,  No.  1,  January  &  February  2004 


3  apical  teeth  and  0-4  lateral  denticles;  prostheca  rudimentary,  with  well  developed  fringe.  Hypo- 
pharynx  superlinguae  laterally  curved  and  apically  pointed.  Maxillae  with  dense  hairlike  setal  field. 
mixed  with  row  of  comblike  setae  almost  entirely  on  galealacinial  crown,  without  medioapical  comb- 
like  seta,  and  with  row  of  dense  hairlike  setae  on  medial  margin;  maxillary  palp  segment  1  0.26  mm, 
segment  2  0.29  mm,  and  segment  3  0.12  mm  in  length;  segment  2  with  sparse  hairlike  setae  along 
outer  margin;  segment  3  indistinctly  demarcated  from  segment  2,  with  moderately  developed  outer 
margin,  and  with  moderately  developed  setal  field  along  outer  margin.  Labial  glossae  dorsoventral- 
ly  elongated  and  ventrally  stalked,  with  dense  hairlike  setae;  paraglossae  with  dense  hairlike  setal 
field  dorsoapically;  labial  palp  segment  1  0.38  mm,  segment  2  0.27  mm,  and  segment  3  0.20  mm  in 
length;  segment  3  indistinctly  demarcated  from  segment  2,  apically  pointed,  with  dense  hairlike  setal 
field  along  outer  margin,  and  with  stout  setal  row  along  inner  margin.  Thorax:  Pronotum  anterolat- 
eral  margins  round;  lateral  margins  with  row  of  sparse  hairlike  setae.  Forefemora  1.15-1.50  mm,  fore- 
tibiae  1.00-1.38  mm,  foretarsi  0.43-0.55  mm,  and  foreclaws  0.15-0.25  mm  in  length  (forefemora> 
foretibiae>foretarsi>foreclaws);  forefemora  with  a  few  hairlike  setae  on  dorsal  and  ventral  surfaces, 
and  with  hairlike  setal  field  along  posterior  margin  (anterior  margin  with  few  hairlike  setae);  foretib- 
iae  with  relatively  sparse  hairlike  setae  (filtering  setae)  dorsally  and  along  outer  margin  (inner  mar- 
gin with  few  hairlike  setae),  with  stout  setal  field  (raking  setae)  5/6  apically  on  inner  margin;  fore- 
tarsi  with  relatively  sparse  hairlike  setae  on  dorsal  and  lateral  surfaces;  foreclaws  apically  darker, 
with  rowed  tiny  teeth  basally.  Midlegs  and  hindlegs  moderately  setose;  length  femora>tibiae> 
tarsi>claws.  Abdomen:  Terga  light  yellow  to  light  brown,  mostly  with  broad  submedian  dark  brown 
stripes,  without  long  hairlike  setal  field  along  median  line,  and  with  hairlike  setal  row  along  lateral 
margins;  abdominal  segment  8-9  with  moderately  to  well  developed  posterolateral  projections. 
Sterna  bare.  Gills  on  abdominal  segment  1-7,  double;  both  lamellae  with  indistinct  to  distinct  tra- 
cheae, with  single  apical  filament;  gill  lamella  inner  part  strongly  expanded  apicolaterally,  and  with 
fine  setae  on  1/10-1/2  apical  margin;  gill  lamella  outer  part  with  fine  setae  on  apically  1/10  to  entire 
margin;  apical  filament  attenuating,  marginally  with  fine  setae;  gills  4  1.11-1.67  mm  in  length,  0.56- 
0.89  mm  in  width,  0.95-1 .43  mm  in  filament  length,  with  weakly  to  strongly  developed  apical  expan- 
sion. Caudal  filament  segments  with  whorls  of  setae. 

Egg.  Egg  (Fig.  5)  oval;  long  axis  149  ^m;  short  axis  100  (im.  Color  light  yellow  in  nature,  white 
in  alcohol.  Egg  surface  (Fig.  6)  with  ca.  116  knob-terminated  coiled  threads  nearly  evenly  distributed 
throughout  egg  surface,  with  0.4-2.1  jam  tiny  granules  throughout  egg  surface;  diameter  of  knob-ter- 
minated coiled  threads  8.6-10.3  ^.m.  Polar  caps  absent. 

Diagnosis.  The  adults  and  larvae  of  Ulmerophlebia  can  be  distinguished  from 
those  of  Jappa  as  specified  above,  in  the  diagnosis  of  Jappa.  The  larvae  of 
Ulmerophlebia  can  be  distinguished  from  other  leptophlebiid  genera  by  the  fol- 
lowing combination  of  characters:  possessing  a  prominent  median  tubercle  ante- 
riorly on  the  labrum,  lacking  cephalic  tusks,  and  possessing  a  somewhat  enlarged 
clypeal  margin  with  sublateral  tubercles  and  subapicolateral  and  subbasolateral 
hairlike  setal  fields. 

Species  included.  Ulmerophlebia  mjobergi  (Ulmer,  1916),  U.  pipinna  Suter 
(1986),  Ulmerophlebia  AV2  (Dean,  1999),  Ulmerophlebia  AV3  (Dean,  1999), 
and  Ulmerophlebia  AV5  (Dean,  1999). 

Distribution.  NSW,  QLD,  and  VIC. 

Remarks.  Deleatidium  annulatum  Marker  (1950)  [Holotype:  M;  locality: 
NSW,  Point  Lookout,  Serpentine;  deposition:  Australian  Museum,  Sydney  (des- 
troyed)] was  considered  as  Ulmerophlebia  by  Dean  (1999),  but  the  original 
description  of  the  adult  (e.g.  wings)  by  Marker  (1950)  does  not  support  place- 
ment in  Ulmerophlebia  and  the  description  of  the  larva  (e.g.  maxillary  palp)  by 
Marker  (1954)  does  not  meet  the  generic  concept  of  Ulmerophlebia. 

Atopopus  spadix  Marker  (1950)  [Holotype:  M;  locality:  NSW,  Armidale;  dep- 
osition: Australian  Museum,  Sydney  (destroyed)]  was  also  considered  as 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Ulmerophlebia  by  Dean  (1999),  but  the  original  description  of  the  adult  (e.g. 
wings)  by  Harker  (1950)  does  not  support  its  placement  in  Ulmerophlebia. 

DISCUSSION 

In  the  phylogeny  of  the  Atalophlebiinae  (Leptophlebiidae),  the  genera  Jappa 
and  Ulmerophlebia  have  been  hypothesized  to  constitute  a  basal  clade,  including 
Hapsiphlebia,  Atalophlebia,  Atalomicria,  Acanthophlebia,  Aprionix,  and  Kal- 
baybaria  (Pescador  and  Peters,  1980;  Towns  and  Peters,  1980,  1996;  Campbell, 
1993;  Christidis,  2001 ).  This  clade,  also  known  as  the  Hapsiphlebia  lineage,  was 
defined  by  the  synapomorphies  of  lateral  setae  of  the  larval  abdomen  and  incisor 
denticulation  of  the  right  mandible  (Pescador  and  Peters,  1980). 

From  our  comprehensive  examinations  of  the  species  of  Jappa  and 
Ulmerophlebia  and  the  species  of  related  outgroup  genera,  we  recognize  an  addi- 
tional clade  consisting  of  Jappa  and  Ulmerophlebia.  This  clade  is  defined  by  the 
synapomorphies  of  1)  a  setose  body,  2)  gills  marginally  clothed  with  fine  setae, 
3)  a  median  denticle  anteriorly  on  the  labrum,  4)  submedian  setal  fields  ventral- 
ly  on  the  labrum,  and  5)  lateral  spines  on  the  larval  abdomen. 

Jappa  and  Ulmerophlebia  are  thus  distinct  monophyletic  sister  groups.  Jappa 
is  defined  by  the  synapomorphies  of  1)  cephalic  tusks,  2)  a  hairlike  setal  field 
ventrally  on  the  mandible,  3)  double  rows  of  hairlike  setae  (filtering  setae)  dor- 
sally  on  the  tibiae,  and  4)  a  long  hairlike  setal  field  along  median  abdomen.  The 
cephalic  tusks  (Fig.  1)  are  unique  in  Leptophlebiidae.  The  cephalic  tusks  are 
arched  and  apically  convergent  and  upward.  They  also  bear  basodorsal  tubercles 
and  setal  fields  at  basomedial,  subbasolateral,  and  apicodorsal  areas.  The  body 
setation  in  Jappa  is  more  specialized  in  having  double  rows  of  filtering  setae  on 
inner  and  outer  margins  of  tibiae  and  broad  setal  fields  on  forefemora  and  along 
the  median  line  of  dorsal  abdomen. 

The  monophyly  of  the  Ulmerophlebia  is  supported  by  the  synapomorphy  of 
the  unique  "shovel-like"  clypeal  development  (Fig.  2).  The  clypeus  of  Ulmero- 
phlebia is  flattened  and  somewhat  elongated  and  possesses  sublateral  tubercles 
and  hairlike  setal  fields  in  the  subbasolateral  and  subapicolateral  areas. 

Although  the  adults  ofJappa-Ulmerophlebia  clade  retain  many  plesiomorphic 
characters  shared  with  other  Hapsiphlebia  lineage  groups,  the  larvae  are  quite 
specialized  as  shown  herein.  The  hairy  body  is  associated  with  the  fossorial  habit 
of  the  members  of  Jappa  -Ulmerophlebia  clade  and  the  cephalic  tusks  and  shov- 
el in  Jappa  and  Ulmerophlebia,  respectively,  are  evidently  burrowing  devices.  In 
particular,  the  cephalic  tusks  of  Jappa  are  analogous  to  the  mandibular  tusks  of 
the  Potamanthidae  in  Ephemeroidea,  their  Laurasian  counterpart  (Bae  and 
McCafferty,  1991,  1995),  in  terms  of  functional  morphology  and  burrowing 
behavior. 

As  evidenced  above,  the  genera  Jappa  and  Ulmerophlebia  are  distinct  mono- 
phyletic groups  that  are  here  recognized  at  the  generic  level.  Presumably,  this 
will  confirm  with  a  strict  phylogenetic  classification  if  indeed  the  Jappa- 


Vol.  1 1 5,  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 


Ulmerophlebia  clade,  which  is  unique  among  Australian  leptophlebiids  being  a 
burrowing  mayfly  group,  is  recognized  as  a  distinct  tribe  as  suggested  for  group- 
ings under  the  subfamilies  of  Leptophlebiidae  by  Peters  (1980).  That  classifica- 
tion can  be  adopted  when  the  generic  phytogenies  of  the  Australian  Leptophle- 
biidae are  completed. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  John  Dean  (Victoria  EPA),  Phil  Suter  (LaTrobe  University),  Richard  Marchant 
(Museum  of  Victoria),  Kimberi  Pullan  (ANIC,  Canberra),  Fred  Govedich  and  Bonnie  Bain  (Monash 
University),  Nigel  Ainsworth  (DPI,  Victoria),  and  Dennis  O'Dowd  (Monash  University)  for  their 
loans  of  material,  field  work  assistance,  and  useful  comments.  We  also  thank  anonymous  reviewers 
for  their  useful  comments  and  suggestions.  This  research  was  conducted  during  YJB's  sabbatical 
leave  to  Monash  University  (September  2000-August  2001)  that  was  supported  by  the  Korea 
Research  Foundation  Grant  (KRF-2001-013-G00007). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bae,  Y.  J.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1991.  Phylogenetic  systematics  of  the  Potamanthidae 
(Ephemeroptera).  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  117:1-143. 

Bae,  Y.  J.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.   1995.  Ephemeroptera  tusks  and  their  evolution,  pp.  377-405.  In. 

L.  Corkum  and  J.  Ciborowski  (Editors).  Current  Directions  in  Research  on  Ephemeroptera. 
Canadian  Scholar's  Publishing,  Inc.  Toronto,  Canada.  478  pp. 

Campbell,  I.  C.  1990.  The  Australian  mayfly  fauna:  composition,  distribution  and  convergence,  pp. 
149-153.  //;.  I.  C.  Campbell  (Editor)  Mayflies  and  Stoneflies.  Kluwer  Academic  Publishers.  Dor- 
drecht, The  Netherlands.  366  pp. 

Campbell,  I.  C.  1993.  A  new  genus  and  species  of  leptophlebiid  mayfly  (Ephemeroptera:  Lep- 
tophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae)  from  tropical  Australia.  Aquatic  Insects  15:159-167. 

Christidis,  F.  2001.  Cladistic  analysis  of  Austrophlebiodes  and  related  genera  (Leptophlebiidae: 
Atalophlebiinae).  pp.  305-312.  In,  E.  Dominguez  (Editor).  Trends  in  Research  in  Ephemeroptera 
and  Plecoptera.  Kluwer  Academic  /  Plenum  Publishers.  New  York,  NY,  U.S.A.  490  pp. 

Dean,  J.  C.  1999.  Preliminary  Keys  for  the  Identification  of  Australia  Mayfly  Nymphs  of  the 
Family  Leptophlebiidae.  Cooperative  Research  Center  for  Freshwater  Ecology,  Identification 
Guide  No.  20,  Albury,  New  South  Wales,  Australia.  91  pp. 

Dean,  J.  C.  and  P.  J.  Suter.  1996.  Mayfly  Nymphs  of  Australia.  A  Guide  to  Genera.  Cooperative 
Research  Center  for  Freshwater  Ecology,  Identification  Guide  No.  7.  Albury,  New  South  Wales, 
Australia.  82  pp. 

Demon  I  in.  G.  1955.  Note  sur  deux  nouveaux  genres  de  Leptophlebiidae  d'Australie  (Ephemer- 
optera). Bulletin  et  Annales  de  la  Societe  Royale  Entomologique  de  Belgique  91:227-229. 

Eaton,  A.  E.  1871.  A  monograph  on  the  Ephemeridac.  Transactions  of  the  Entomological  Society 
of  London  1871:1-164. 

Eaton,  A.  E.  1884.  A  revisional  monograph  of  recent  Ephemeridae  or  mayflies.  Part  II.  Trans- 
actions of  the  Linnean  Society,  Second  Series,  Zoology  3:77-152. 

Edmunds,  G.  F.,  Jr.,  and  VV.  P.  McCafferty.  1996.  New  field  observations  on  burrowing  in 
Ephemeroptera  from  around  the  world.  Entomological  News  107:68-76. 

Harker,  J.  E.  1950.  Australian  Ephemeroptera.  Part  I.  Taxonomy  of  New  South  Wales  species  and 
evaluation  of  taxonomic  characters.  Proceedings  of  the  Linnean  Society  of  New  South  Wales 
71:1-34. 


10  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Marker,  J.  E.  1954.  The  Ephemeroptera  of  Eastern  Australia.  Transactions  of  the  Royal  Entomo- 
logical Society  of  London  105:241-268. 

Pescador,  M.  L.  and  W.  L.  Peters.  1980.  Phylogenetic  relationships  and  zoogeography  of  cool- 
adapted  Leptophlebiidae  (Ephemeroptera).  pp.  43-56.  In,  J.  F.  Flannagan  and  K.  E.  Marshall 
(Editors)  Advances  in  Ephemeroptera  Biology.  Plenum  Press,  New  York,  NY,  U.S.A.  552  pp. 

Peters,  W.  L.  1980.  Phylogeny  of  the  Leptophlebiidae  (Ephemeroptera):  an  introduction,  pp.  33-41. 
In,  J.  F.  Flannagan  and  K.  E.  Marshall  (Editors)  Advances  in  Ephemeroptera  Biology.  Plenum 
Press.  New  York,  NY,  U.S.A.  552  pp. 

Peters,  W.  L.  and  I.  C.  Campbell.  1991.  Ephemeroptera  (Mayflies),  pp.  279-293.  In,  The  Insects 
of  Australia.  Second  Edition,  Vol.  I.  Melbourne  Univ.  Press,  Carlton,  Victoria,  Australia.  542  pp. 

Riek,  E.  F.  1970.  Ephemeroptera  (Mayflies),  pp.  224-240.  In,  The  Insects  of  Australia.  Melbourne 
University  Press.  Carlton,  Victoria,  Australia.  1029  pp. 

Skedros,  D.  G.  and  D.  A.  Polhemus.  1986.  Two  new  species  ofJappa  from  Australia  (Ephemer- 
optera: Leptophlebiidae).  The  Pan-Pacific  Entomologist  62:311-315. 

Suter,  P.  J.  1986.  The  Ephemeroptera  (mayflies)  of  South  Australia.  Records  of  the  South 
Australian  Museum  19:339-397. 

Towns,  D.  R.  and  W.  L.  Peters.  1980.  Phylogenetic  relationships  of  the  Leptophlebiidae  of  New 
Zealand  (Ephemeroptera).  pp.  57-69.  In,  J.  F.  Flannagan  and  K.  E.  Marshall  (Editors).  Advances 
in  Ephemeroptera  Biology.  Plenum  Press.  New  York,  NY,  U.S.A.  552  pp. 

Towns,  D.  R.  and  W.  L.  Peters.  1996.  Leptophlebiidae  (Insecta:  Ephemeroptera).  Fauna  of  New 
Zealand.  36:1-143. 

Ulmer,  G.  1916.  Results  of  Dr.  E.  Mjoberg's  Swedish  Scientific  Expedition  to  Australia  1910-1913. 
6.  Ephemeroptera.  Arkiv  for  Zoologi  10:1-18. 

Ulmer,  G.  1920.  Ubersicht  iiber  die  Gattungen  der  Ephemeropteren,  nebst  Bemerkungen  iiber 
einzelne  Arten.  Stettiner  Entomologische  Zeitung  81:97-144. 

Williams,  W.  D.  1968.  Australian  Freshwater  Life.  The  Invertebrates  of  Australian  Inland  Waters. 
Sun  Books.  Melbourne,  Australia.  262  pp. 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 lj_ 

A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  PLATYCEPHALA  FROM  CHINA 
(DIPTERA:  CHLOROPIDAE:  CHLOROPINAE)1 

Shuwen  An2  and  Ding  Yang' 

ABSTRACT:  The  genus  Platycephala  is  newly  recorded  from  Guangxi,  with  the  description  of  a 
new  species  P.  guangxiensis.  Remarks  on  its  relationships  with  the  close  species  P.  zhejiangensis 
Yang  and  Yang,  1995,  are  given. 

KEY  WORDS:  Diptera,  Chloropidae,  Chloropinae,  Platycephala,  China. 

The  genus  Platycephala  Fallen  belongs  to  the  subfamily  Chloropinae,  and  is 
characterized  by  the  following  features:  Body  large;  head  distinctly  longer  than 
high;  frontal  triangle  occupying  large  part  of  frons,  reaching  anterior  margin  of 
frons  with  broadened  apex;  arista  slender  with  short  pubescence  (Kanmiya, 
1983).  Until  now  the  genus  Platycephala  contained  seventeen  species  world- 
wide, of  which  eleven  are  known  from  the  Oriental  Realm  (Sabrosky,  1977; 
Cherian,  1978;  Kanmiya,  1983;  Yang  and  Yang,  1994,  1995,  1997;  An  and  Yang, 
2003)  and  six  from  the  Palaearctic  Realm  (Nartshuk,  1984).  Eight  species  are 
known  from  China  (An  &  Yang,  2003).  The  major  references  dealing  with  Pla- 
tycephala are  as  follows:  Andersson  (1977),  Cherian  (1978),  Kanmiya  (1983). 

In  this  paper,  one  species  of  the  genus  Platycephala  from  Guangxi  is  de- 
scribed as  new  to  science.  Types  are  deposited  in  the  Insect  Collections  of  the 
China  Agricultural  University,  Beijing. 

Platycephala  guangxiensis  An  and  Yang,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.1-8) 

Diagnosis:  Head  triangular  in  profile,  about  1.5  times  as  long  as  high.  Frontal 
triangle  trapezoidal,  polished  brownish  yellow  with  two  blackish  lateral  spots. 
Thorax  black;  propleuron  brown  with  dark  brown  spot  at  posterior  margin;  ptero- 
pleuron  blackish  brown  with  pale  upper  part.  Legs  pale  yellow. 

Description:  Male:  Body  length  5.5-6.5  mm,  wing  length  3.8-4.6  mm. 

Head  (Figs  1-2)  blackish  brown,  triangular  in  profile,  about  1.5  times  as  long  as  high;  frons 
strongly  produced  beyond  anterior  level  of  eye,  in  profile  about  0.35  times  as  long  as  long  axis  of 
eye;  gena  prominently  broadened  posterad,  anteriorly  strongly  narrowed  below  eye;  parafacial  about 
0.07  times  as  broad  as  long  axis  of  eye.  Frontal  triangle  trapezoidal,  polished  brownish  yellow,  occu- 
pying most  of  frons  and  reaching  its  anterior  margin,  semicircular  anteriorly  with  two  blackish  later- 
al spots,  and  with  many  transverse  grooves  occupying  median  longitudinal  area  in  front  of  ocelli; 
ocellar  triangle  black;  area  between  eye  and  frontal  triangle  depressed  and  brownish.  Occiput  sub- 
shiny  and  punctured;  gena  and  frons  (in  front  of  eye)  brownish.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  head  brownish 
black.  Antenna  (Fig  3)  brown  with  pale  gray  pollen;  pedicel  0.8  times  as  long  as  flagellum;  flagel- 
lum  nearly  rectangular,  1 .6  times  as  long  as  wide,  rounded  apically,  with  blackish  brown  anterior  and 


1  Submitted  on  May  15,  2003.  Accepted  on  May  18,  2004. 

:  Department   of  Entomology,   China  Agricultural    University,    Beijing    100094,   China.    H-mail: 
shuwen _anfr/  hotmail.com. 

'Department   of  Entomology,   China  Agricultural    University,    Beijing    100094,   China.    E-mail: 
dingyang(o>cau. edu.cn  or  dyangcaudaJyahoo.com.cn.  Corresponding  author. 

Mailed  on  November  12.  2004 


12 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


8 


Figs.  1-8.  Platycephala  guangxiensis,  n.  sp.  (male  and  female).  1,  head,  dorsal  view; 
2,  head,  lateral  view;  3,  antenna,  outer  lateral  view;  4,  hind  femur,  lateral  view;  5,  epan- 
drium,  posterior  view;  6,  hypandrium  and  phallic  complex,  ventral  view;  7,  female 
abdominal  terminalia,  ventral  view;  8,  female  abdominal  terminalia,  dorsal  view. 


Vol.  115.  No.  I.  January  &  February  2004 


dorsal  margins;  arista  pale  yellow  with  brownish  basal  segment,  pale  short  pubescent.  Proboscis  and 
palpus  pale  yellow  with  pale  hairs. 

Thorax  black,  slightly  narrower  than  head;  propleuron  brown  with  dark  brown  spot  at  posterior 
margin;  pteropleuron  blackish  brown  with  pale  upper  part;  mesonorum  1.3  times  as  long  as  wide, 
with  prominent  setigerous  punctures;  scutellum  pale  pollinose,  1.5  times  as  wide  as  long  and  brown 
at  posterior  margin.  Hairs  on  thorax  pale,  bristles  black;  apical  scutellar  bristles  convergent  posteri- 
orly and  nearly  as  long  as  scutellum;  subapical  scutellar  bristles  about  0.2  times  as  long  as  scutellum; 
sternopleuron  with  some  long  thin  hairs.  Legs  pale  yellow  and  pollinose  except  hind  femur  and  basal 
part  of  hind  tibia  brownish.  Hind  femur  (Fig  4)  distinctly  thickened,  about  3.4  times  as  long  as  wide 
and  3  times  as  thick  as  fore  femur;  hind  tibia  somewhat  curved  and  black  ventrally.  Hairs  on  legs  pale, 
but  tarsi  with  brown  hairs.  Wing  hyaline;  veins  mostly  brown.  Relative  lengths  of  costal  sections  2nd: 
3rd  :  4th  =2.2  :  3.2  :  2.2;  relative  lengths  of  ultimate  and  penultimate  sections  of  veins  R2+3  (4.4:1), 
R4+5  (5.3:1.5),  M  (4:2.2),  CuAj  (1:3.2);  penultimate  section  of  M  about  7.3  times  as  long  as  r-m;  R4+5 
and  M  nearly  parallel;  dm-cu  and  r-m  convergent  posteriorly.  Squama  yellow  with  brownish  yellow- 
hairs.  Halter  pale  yellow  with  white  knob. 

Abdomen  dark  brown;  tergites  1-2  black  and  rugose;  tergite  7  and  following  tergites  brownish; 
venter  yellow.  Hairs  on  abdomen  pale;  dorsum  with  some  long  thin  hairs  laterally.  Male  genitalia 
(Figs  5-6):  epandrium  blackish,  nearly  as  long  as  wide,  with  some  long  hairs;  surstyli  brown,  attached 
to  epandrium  at  base,  narrow  and  crossing  apically;  hypandrium  blackish,  higher  than  wide;  gonites 
well  demarcated  by  oblique  suture;  pregonites  parallel-sided  with  distal  ends  acute;  postgonites 
oblique,  distal  ends  convergent. 

Female:  Body  length  6.3-7.3  mm,  wing  length  4.1-4.3  mm.  Similar  to  male.  Female  genitalia 
(Figs  7-8):  yellow;  tergite  10  nearly  rectangular,  distinctly  longer  than  wide,  distal  portion  narrowing 
toward  tip  and  membranous;  sternite  10  nearly  quadrate,  shorter  than  tergite  10.  Hairs  on  genitalia 
brown,  short,  but  sternite  10  with  one  row  of  long  hairs  on  apical  margin;  tergite  10  and  cerci  also 
with  some  long  hairs. 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  male,  CHINA:  Guangxi,  Tianlin,  Cengwanglaoshan,  2002.  VIII.  15,  Ding 
Yang,  deposited  in  the  Insect  Collection  of  China  Agricultural  University,  Beijing.  Paratypes:  2 
males,  2  females.  Same  data  and  repository  as  holotype. 

Etymology  of  specific  epithet:  The  species  is  named  after  the  type  locality 
Guangxi. 

DISCUSSION 

The  new  species  is  somewhat  similar  to  Platycephala  zhejiangensis  Yang  et 
Yang,  1995  from  Zhejiang  in  having  the  blackish  brown  head  and  brown  anten- 
na, but  can  be  separated  from  the  latter  by  the  brown  propleuron  with  dark  brown 
spot  at  posterior  margin,  blackish  brown  pteropleuron  with  pale  upper  part  and 
pale  yellow  hind  tibia.  In  P.  zhejiangensis,  the  thorax  is  wholly  black,  and  the 
hind  tibia  is  black  (Yang  and  Yang,  1995). 

Nine  species  of  the  genus  Platycephala  are  known  to  occur  in  China.  Among 
them  seven  species  (P.  guangxiensis  An  and  Yang,  P.  guizhouensis  An  and  Yang, 
P.  Hi  An  and  Yang,  P.  maculata  An  and  Yang,  P.  sichuanensis  Yang  and  Yang,  P. 
xanthodes  Yang  and  Yang,  as  well  as  P.  zhejiangensis  Yang  and  Yang)  are  scat- 
tered in  the  central  and  southern  regions  of  China:  Western  Mountain  subregion 
(Sichuan),  Min-Guang  subregion  (Guangxi),  East  Hilly  Plain  subregion 
(Zhejiang),  Guizhou  Plateau  province  (Guizhou),  and  Southern  Yunnan  subre- 
gion (Yunnan).  All  these  regions  are  part  of  the  Oriental  Realm.  Two  other 
species  [P.  sinensis  Yang  and  Yang,  P.  umbraculata  (Fabricius)]  are  distributed  in 
the  Neimeng-Xinjiang  region  and  the  North  China  region  (Beijing,  Neimeng, 
Shaanxi)  which  are  part  of  the  Palaerarctic  Realm.  Platycephala  umbraculata  is 
also  distributed  in  other  parts  of  Asia  (Japan  and  Mongolia)  and  Europe. 


14  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  are  very  grateful  to  Prof.  Guofang  Jiang,  Nanjing  Normal  University,  for  his  help  in  many 
ways.  This  research  was  supported  by  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (No. 
30225009). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

An,  S.  and  D.  Yang.  2003.  A  review  of  the  genus  Platycephala  Fallen,  1820  from  China  (Diptera, 
Chloropidae).  Annales  Zoologici  53(4):65  1-656. 

Andersson,  H.  1977.  Taxonomic  and  phylogenetic  studies  on  Chloropidae  (Diptera)  with  special 
reference  to  Old  World  genera.  Entomologica  Scandinavica.  Supplement  8:200  pp. 

Cherian,  P.  T.  1978.  The  genus  Platycephala  (Diptera:  Chloropidae)  From  India.  Oriental  Insects 


Kanmiya,  K.  1983.  A  systematic  study  of  the  Japanese  Chloropidae  (Diptera).  Memoirs  of  the 
Entomological  Society  of  Washington  11.  370  pp. 

Nartshuk,  E.  P.  1984.  Family  Chloropidae.  pp  222-299.  In,  Soos,  A.  and  L.  Papp.  (Editors).  Cata- 
logue of  Palaearctic  Diptera,  Volume  10.  Akademiai  Kiado.  Budapest,  Hungary.  402  pp 

Sabrosky,  C.  W.  1977.  Family  Chloropidae.  pp  277-319.  In,  Hardy,  D.  E.  and  Delfinado,  M.  D. 
(Editors).  A  Catalog  of  Diptera  of  the  Oriental  Region.  Volume  3.  The  University  Press  of  Hawaii, 
Honolulu.  854  pp. 

Yang,  D.  and  J.  K.  Yang.  (1995)  Diptera:  Chloropidae,  pp  541-543.  In,  Wu,  H.  (Editor).  Insects  of 
Baishanzu  Mountain,  eastern  China.  China  Forestry  Publishing  House.  Beijing,  China.  586  pp. 
(In,  Mandarin) 

Yang,  D.  and  J.  K.  Yang.  1997.  Diptera:  Chloropidae.  pp  1553-1554.  In,  Yang,  X.  K.  (Editor). 
Insects  of  the  Three  Gorge  Reservoir  area  of  Yangtze  River.  Chongqing  Publishing  House. 
Chongqing,  China.  1847  pp.  (In  Mandarin) 

Yang,  J.  K.  and  D.  Yang.  1994.  New  species  of  the  genus  Platycephala  (Diptera:  Chloropidae) 
from  China.  Entomotaxonomia  16(2):153-155. 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 


REVIEW  OF  THE  NEOTROPICAL  GENUS 

TRACHELIUM  HERRICH-SCHAEFFER, 
WITH  THE  DESCRIPTION  OF  SIX  NEW  SPECIES 
(HETEROPTERA:  ALYDIDAE:  MICRELYTRINAE: 

MICRELYTRINI)1 

Harry  Brailovsky' 

ABSTRACT:  Six  new  species  of  Trachelium  Herrich-Schaeffer  from  Argentina,  Bolivia,  Brazil, 
Colombia,  French  Guiana,  Panama,  Trinidad,  and  Venezuela  are  described.  New  distributional 
records  are  given  for:  T.  alboapicatus  Distant,  T.  bicolor  Herrich-Schaeffer,  T.  fulvipes  Herrich- 
Schaeffer,  T.  mimeticum  Breddin,  T.  spectabile  Bergroth,  and  T.  tessellatus  Distant.  A  diagnosis  for 
previously  known  species  is  provided,  T.  spectabile  is  redescribed,  a  key  for  the  known  species  is 
given,  and  T.  fulvipes  is  resurrected  from  his  synonym  under  T.  bicolor. 

KEY  WORDS:  Insecta,  Hemiptera,  Alydidae,  Micrelytrinae,  Trachelium,  new  species,  Central  and 
South  America 

This  paper  attempts  to  summarize  our  knowledge  of  the  genus  Trachelium 
Herrich-Schaeffer.  Trachelium,  a  typically  myrmecomorphic  and  exclusively 
Neotropical  genus,  is  characterized  by  having  the  humeral  angles  of  the  prono- 
tum  and  the  apex  of  the  scutellum  strongly  spinose,  the  head  elongate  before 
eyes,  the  head  behind  eyes  tapering  and  narrowed,  and  the  hind  femora  unarmed. 
Schaefer  (1996)  discussed  the  relationship  with  Cydamus  Stal,  the  most  closely 
related,  and  recently  Schaefer  (2004)  added  a  key  to  the  new  world  Alydidae. 

Trachelium  is  placed  in  the  tribe  Micrelytrini  based  on  having  rostral  segment 

II  longer  than  maximal  length  of  segments  III  and  IV  together,  rostral  segment 

III  less  than  half  as  long  as  IV,  and  a  distinct  evaporative  area  ridge.  Previously 
only  six  species  were  known.  In  this  contribution,  six  new  species  collected  in 
Argentina,  Bolivia,  Brazil,  Colombia,  French  Guiana,  Panama,  Trinidad  and 
Venezuela  are  described,  and  new  distribution  records  for  T.  alboapicatus.  T. 
bicolor,  T.  fulvipes,  T.  mimeticum,  T.  spectabile,  and  T.  tessellatus  are  included. 
Trachelium  fulvipes  is  resurrected  from  the  synonymy  under  T.  bicolor. 

The  following  abbreviations  are  used  for  the  institutions  cited  in  this  paper: 
AMNH  (The  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  New  York,  USA);  BMNH 
(The  Natural  History  Museum,  London,  England);  BYU  (Brigham  Young  Uni- 
versity, Monte  L.  Bean  Life  Sciences  Museum,  Provo,  Utah,  USA);  CAS  (Cali- 
fornia Academy  of  Sciences,  San  Francisco,  California,  USA);  CMNH  (Carnegie 
Museum  of  Natural  History,  Pittsburgh,  PA,  USA);  CUIC  (Cornell  University, 
Insect  Collection,  Ithaca,  New  York,  USA);  DEU  (Deutschcs  Entomologisches 
Institut,  Eberswalde,  Germany);  FMNH  (Field  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Chicago,  Illinois,  USA);  HMNH  (Hungarian  Natural  History  Museum,  Buda- 


1  Received  on  April  20,  2004.  Accepted  on  May  18,  2004. 

'  Departamento  de  Zoologia,  Instituto  de  Biologia,  UNAM,  Apartado  Postal  No.  70153,  Mexico 
04510  D.F.  Mexico.   E-mails:  coreidae(tf)servidor.unam.m\   or  amayal(o)yahoo.com. 

Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


16  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


pest,  Hungary);  INBIO  (Institute  Nacional  de  Biodiversidad,  Heredia,  Costa 
Rica);  INPA  (Institute  de  Pesquizas  da  Amazonia,  Manaus,  Brazil);  MNHN 
(Museum  National  D'Histoire  Naturelle,  Paris,  France);  MNRJ  (Museum 
National,  Rio  de  Janeiro,  Brazil);  RNHL  (Rijksmuseum  van  Naturlijke  Histoire, 
Leiden,  Netherlands);  UNAM  (Institute  de  Biologia,  Universidad  Nacional 
Autonoma  de  Mexico,  Coleccion  Nacional  de  Insectos);  USNM  (United  States 
National  Museum,  Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  D.C.,  USA);  USUL 
(Utah  State  University,  Logan,  Utah,  USA). 


KEY  TO  THE  SPECIES  OF  TRACHELIUM 

1.  Head  dorsally,  pronotum,  and  scutellum  black  to  dark  reddish  brown 2 

la.       Head  dorsally,  pronotum,  and  scutellum  shiny  orange  to  chestnut  orange 7 

2.  Antennal  segment  IV  reddish  brown  to  chestnut  orange,  with  basal  third  or  basal  half  yellow 
3 

2a.       Antennal  segment  IV  entirely  reddish  brown  to  black 4 

3.  Scutellar  spine  reddish  brown;  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  bilobed,  and  raised;  tubercle 
of  calli  exposed  and  acute Trachelium  ventus  NEW  SPECIES 

3a.       Scutellar  spine  reddish  brown  with  base  yellow;  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  elongate,  flat 
and  not  bilobed;  tubercle  of  calli  short  and  stout Trachelium  alvarengai  NEW  SPECIES 

4.  Femora  black  to  dark  reddish  brown  and  with  or  without  yellow  ring  near  middle  third; 
metathorax  black  with  or  without  posterior  margin  yellow;  abdominal  sternite  III  black  with 
or  without  longitudinal  yellow  stripe  at  middle  third 5 

4a.       Femora,  metathorax,  and  abdominal  sternite  III  shiny  orange 

Trachelium  bicolor  Herrich-Schaeffer 

5.  Hemelytral  membrane  with  basal  half  brown  and  the  angle  white,  and  apical  half  pale 
ambarine;  scutellar  spine  dark  reddish  brown Trachelium  spectabile  Bergroth  (in  part) 

5a.       Hemelytral  membrane  pale  ambarine  with  basal  angle  white;  scutellar  spine  dark  reddish 
brown  with  base  yellow 6 

6.  Foreacetabulae,  metacetabulae,  posterior  border  of  propleura,  and  basal  joint  of  hind  femur 
black  to  dark  reddish  brown Trachelium  tessellatus  Distant 

6a.       Foreacetabulae,  metacetabulae,  posterior  border  of  propleura,  and  base  of  hind  femur  yellow 
to  shiny  orange Trachelium  fulvipes  Herrich-Schaeffer 

7.  Hemelytral  membrane  with  basal  half  brown  and  the  angle  white,  and  apical  half  ambarine; 
dorsal  abdominal  segments  black 8 

7a.       Hemelytral  membrane  pale  ambarine,  with  basal  angle  white;  dorsal  abdominal  segments 
orange 9 

8.  Pronotum  and  scutellum  black  to  dark  reddish  brown;  thorax  black  with  anterior  margin  of 

prothorax,  acetabulae,  and  upper  and  posterior  margin  of  metathorax  yellow 

Trachelium  spectabile  Bergroth  (in  part) 

8a.        Pronotum,  scutellum,  and  thorax  shiny  orange  to  chestnut  orange 

Trachelium  mimeticum  Breddin 

9.  Spines  of  humeral  angles  of  pronotum  short,  hooklike,  directed  backward,  with  apex  recurved 
backward  (Fig.  2) Trachelium  formosus  NEW  SPECIES 


Vol.  115,  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 1_7_ 

9a.       Spines  of  humeral  angles  of  pronotum  elongate,  acute,  needlelike,  directed  upward  or  oblique- 
ly backward  (Fig.  1) 10 

10.  Antennal  segment  IV  reddish  brown  to  brownish  orange 1 1 

lOa.     Antennal  segment  IV  brownish  orange  with  basal  third  or  basal  half  yellow 12 

1 1 .  Scutellar  spine  shiny  orange;  length  of  antennal  segment  IV  longer  than  4.80  mm  (d1)  or  3.45 
mm  (9);  total  body  length  longer  than  1 1 .00  mm  (Cf )  or  9.80  mm  (9) 

Trachelium  secularis  NEW  SPECIES 

lla.  Scutellar  spine  shiny  orange  with  basal  joint  yellow;  length  of  antennal  segment  IV  shorter  than 
4.00  mm  (Cf )  or  3.40  mm  (9);  total  body  length  shorter  than  9.00  mm  (Cf ),  or  9.20  mm  (9) ... 
Trachelium  lepidus  NEW  SPECIES 

12.  Metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  creamy  yellow,  tuberculate,  and  conspicuously  raised  above 
the  body  surface;  scutellar  spine  elongate,  needlelike,  and  directed  upward 

Trachelium  alboapicatus  Distant 

12a.     Metathoracic  scent  glad  auricle  yellow,  elongate,  and  flat;  scutellar  spine  iny,  reduced  to  small 
conical  expansion Trachelim  limitatus  NEW  SPECIES 


Trachelium  alboapicatus  Distant 

(Fig.  3) 

Trachelium  alboapicatus  Distant,  1881:  159. 

Diagnosis.  This  species  is  characterized  by  having  the  head,  antennal  seg- 
ments I  to  III,  legs,  and  dorsal  abdominal  segments  shiny  orange  to  chestnut 
orange,  the  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  creamy  yellow,  tuberculate,  and 
raised  above  the  body  surface  (Fig.  3),  antennal  segment  IV  with  the  anterior 
third  creamy  yellow  and  the  posterior  third  dark  brown,  the  humeral  spines  of 
pronotum  large,  elongate,  needlelike,  entirely  shiny  orange  and  directed  oblique- 
ly backward,  and  the  scutellar  spine  entirely  shiny  orange,  and  directed  upward 
with  apex  curving  backward;  hemelytral  membrane  including  the  basal  angle 
pale  ambarine,  calli  raised  forming  a  hemispheric  or  convex  lobe,  and  maximal 
length  of  antennal  segment  IV  longer  than  maximal  length  of  antennal  segments 
II  and  III  together. 

Distribution.  The  present  species  was  described  from  Guatemala  (San  Geronimo,  and  Tamahu) 
and  has  been  subsequently  reported  from  Mexico  (Veracruz:  Atoyac,  and  San  Luis  Potosi: 
Tamazunchale)  and  Panama  (Volcan  de  Chiriqui)  (Distant  1881-1893,  and  Brailovsky  and  Zurbia 
1979). 

Material  examined.  Holotype:  male,  Guatemala,  San  Geronimo,  Champion.  Deposited  in 
BMNH.  New  country  records.  Costa  Rica:  1  male,  3  females,  20  km  S  of  Upala,  11-15-V-1990,  13- 
XII-1990,  1 0-1-1991,  F.  D.  Parker.  Deposited  in  USUL.  1  male,  Alajuela,  Chachahua,  24-11-1982.  H. 
Brailovsky  and  E.  Barrera.  Deposited  in  UNAM.  Guatemala:  1  female,  Alta  Vera  Paz,  Trece  Aguas, 
IV- 1925,  Schwartz  and  Barber.  Deposited  in  AMNH.  Mexico:  1  female,  Veracruz,  San  Andres  Tuxtla, 
Laguna  Escondida,  21 -IV- 1989,  J.  L.  Colin.  Deposited  in  UNAM.  1  male,  Veracruz,  Penuelas,  15- 
VII- 1941,  H.  S.  Dybas.  Deposited  in  FMNH. 


18 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figures  1-5.  Trachelium  spp.  1-2.  Pronotum.  1.  7]  spectabile  Bergroth.  2.  7^  formosus 
NEW  SPECIES.  3.  Metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  of  7^  alboapicatus  Distant.  4-5. 
Hemelytra.  4.  T.  formosus  NEW  SPECIES.  5.  I  spectabile  Bergroth. 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 19 


Trachelium  alvarengai,  NEW  SPECIES 

Description.  Male  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration.  Head,  pronotum  including  humeral  spines, 
scutellum  (base  of  scutellar  spine  yellow),  and  clavus  shiny  black  to  shiny  reddish  brown;  antennal 
segments  I  to  III  chestnut  orange,  IV  chestnut  orange  with  basal  third  yellow;  corium  yellow  with 
apical  margin  creamy  white,  and  punctures,  middle  third  of  exocorium  and  endocorium,  and  apical 
angle  black  to  dark  reddish  brown;  hemelytral  membrane  dark  ambarine  with  basal  angle  grayish  to 
white;  connexival  segments  III-IV  yellow,  V-VI  brown  with  posterior  margin  yellow,  and  VII  brown 
with  posterior  border  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  orange.  Ventral  coloration.  Head  shiny 
pale  reddish  brown;  rostral  segments  I  to  III  shiny  pale  chestnut  orange,  IV  dark  chestnut  orange  with 
apex  black;  propleura  shiny  black  with  acetabulac  and  prosternum  yellow  to  shiny  orange;  meso- 
pleura  shiny  black  with  acetabulae,  posterior  margin,  and  mesosternum  yellow  to  shiny  orange; 
metathorax  including  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  shiny  chestnut  orange;  legs  shiny  chestnut 
orange;  abdominal  sternite  III  chestnut  orange,  IV  shiny  pale  reddish  brown  with  wide  yellow  longi- 
tudinal stripe  running  at  middle  third,  and  V  to  VII  shiny  pale  reddish  brown  with  posterior  margin 
of  V  yellow;  pleural  abdominal  margins  III-IV  and  VII  yellow,  and  V-VI  shiny  pale  reddish  brown 
with  posterior  margin  yellow.  Structure:  Maximal  length  of  antennal  segment  IV  longer  than  maxi- 
mal length  of  antennal  segments  II  and  III  together;  rostrum  reaching  middle  third  of  metasternum; 
each  callus  raised  into  short,  stout,  conical  acute  tubercle;  spines  of  humeral  angles  large,  needlelike, 
recurved  backward;  scutellar  spine  long,  erect,  needlelike,  directed  backward;  metathoracic  scent 
gland  auricle  elongate,  flat,  not  bifurcate,  curved  anteriorly. 

Male  variation.  1.  Rostral  segment  I  dark  brown  with  apical  joint  chestnut  orange.  2.  Hind  femur 
shiny  chestnut  orange  with  pale  yellow  ring  at  middle  third.  3.  Thorax  shiny  black  with  acetabulae 
yellow.  4.  Abdominal  sterna  shiny  black  to  shiny  reddish  brown  with  longitudinal  stripe  at  middle 
third  of  sternite  III  and  posterior  margin  of  V  yellow. 

Female.  Dorsal  coloration.  Head,  pronotum  including  humeral  spines,  scutellum  (base  of  scutel- 
lar spine  yellow),  and  clavus  shiny  black;  antennal  segments  I  to  III  shiny  reddish  brown,  and  IV  dark 
reddish  brown  with  basal  third  yellow;  corium  shiny  black  with  two  short  yellow  to  creamy  yellow 
transversal  fascia,  one  anterior  and  near  to  middle  third,  the  other  posterior  and  close  to  apical  angle; 
hemelytral  membrane  including  basal  angle  dark  ambarine;  connexivum  shiny  black  with  posterior 
margin  or  posterior  border  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  black.  Ventral  coloration.  Shiny  black 
with  following  areas  yellow:  acetabulae,  posterior  margin  of  mesopleura  and  metapleura,  longitudi- 
nal stripe  and  middle  third  of  abdominal  sternite  IV,  posterior  margin  of  abdominal  sternite  V,  and 
posterior  margin  of  pleural  abdominal  margins  IV  and  V;  rostral  segment  I  shiny  black  with  apical 
joint  chestnut  orange,  and  II  to  IV  shiny  chestnut  orange  with  apex  of  IV  black;  metathoracic  scent 
gland  auricle  dark  yellow;  fore  and  middle  legs  with  coxae,  trochanters  and  femora  shiny  black  to 
shiny  reddish  brown,  tibiae  dark  yellow  with  apical  third  chestnut  orange,  and  tarsi  chestnut  orange; 
hind  leg  with  coxa  and  trochanter  shiny  black  to  shiny  reddish  brown,  femur  shiny  black  with  basal 
joint  yellow,  and  tibiae  and  tarsi  like  fore  and  middle  legs. 

Female  variation.  1.  Basal  angle  of  hemelytral  membrane  grayish.  2.  Hind  femur  with  yellow 
ring  near  middle  third. 

Measurements.  Male  given  first,  followed  in  parenthesis  by  those  of  female.  Head  length:  2.14 
mm  (2.44  mm);  width  across  eyes:  1 .68  mm  ( 1 .78  mm);  interocular  space:  0.74  mm  (0.88  mm);  inte- 
rocellar  space:  0.22  mm  (0.30  mm);  preocular  distance:  1.22  mm  (1.44  mm);  antennal  segments 
lengths:  I,  1.48  mm  (1.44  mm);  II,  1.76  mm  ( 1.64  mm);  III,  1.52  mm  (1.40  mm);  IV,  4.24  mm  (3.52 
mm).  Pronotal  length:  1.4X  mm  (1.44  mm);  maximum  width  of  anterior  lobe:  1.20  mm  (1.44  mm); 
maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe  (without  humeral  spines):  1.64  mm  (1.64  mm).  Scutellar  length: 
0.92  mm  (1.04  mm);  width:  0.56  mm  (0.62  mm).  Total  body  length:  9.23  mm  (9.77  mm). 

Type  material.  Holotype:  male,  Brazil,  Amazonas,  Manaus,  22-IV-1954,  Elias  and  Roppa. 
Deposited  in  MNRJ.  Paratypes:  1  female,  Brazil,  Para,  Jacareacanga,  XII-1968,  M.  Alvarenga. 
Deposited  in  AMNH.  1  male,  Brazil,  Amazonas,  Manaus,  Ponte  de  Bolivia,  29-XI-1969,  Evange- 
listas.  Deposited  in  UNAM.  3  females,  Bra/il,  Rondonia,  62  km  SW  Ariquemes,  Fzda  Rancho 
Grande,  30-III-10-IV-1992,  J.  E.  Eger.  Deposited  in  USNM  (Drake  Collection). 

Discussion.  Of  the  known  species  of  Trachelium  with  the  head,  pronotum, 
scutellum,  and  clavus  shiny  black  to  shiny  reddish  brown  only  T.  ulvarengcii  has 
antennal  segment  IV  bicolored.  In  T.  bicolor  Herrich-Schaeffer,  T.  fulvipes 
Herrich-Schaeffer,  and  T.  tessellatus  Distant,  antennal  segment  IV  is  entirely 
black  to  reddish  brown. 


20  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Trachelium  alboapicatus  Distant  has  antennal  segment  IV  bicolored,  both  the 
head,  pronotum,  scutellum,  and  clavus  are  shiny  orange  to  shiny  chestnut  orange, 
and  the  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  is  conspicuously  tuberculiform  (Fig.  3). 
This  new  species  exhibits  a  clearly  dimorphic  color,  which  is  explained  in  the 

description  of  each  sex. 

Etymology.  Named  after  Moacir  Alvarenga,  who  collected  one  of  the  paratypes  of  this  species. 

Trachelium  bicolor  Herrich-Schaeffer 

Trachelium  bicolor  Herrich-Schaeffer,  1853:  274-275. 

The  type  species  of  the  genus  Trachelium  is  distinguished  by  having  the  head, 
pronotum,  and  scutellum  (base  of  scutellar  spine  yellow)  black,  antennal  seg- 
ment IV  black  to  dark  reddish  brown,  dorsal  abdominal  segments  dark  yellow 
with  segment  VII  black,  and  following  areas  shiny  orange  to  shiny  chestnut 

orange:  femora,  metathorax,  and  abdominal  sternite  III. 

Distribution.  This  attractive  species  was  originally  described  from  Brazil  (Rio  de  Janeiro,  and 
Santa  Catarina:  Nova  Teutonia)  and  subsequently  reported  from  Argentina  (Misiones:  Pindapoy, 
Iguazu,  Presidente  Peron,  and  Ciervo  Petizo)  and  Bolivia  (Yungas  and  Coroico)  (Herrich-Schaeffer 
1853,  Stal  1870,  and  Kormilev  1953). 

Material  examined.  New  country  records.  Brazil:  4  males,  2  females,  Minas  Gerais,  Pedra 
Azul,  XI- 1970,  1-1971,  F.  M.  Oliveira.  Deposited  in  AMNH  and  UNAM.  4  males,  Minas  Gerais, 
Carmo  do  Rio  Claro,  VI- 1943,  Carvalho  and  1-1978  Carvalho  and  Schaffner.  Deposited  in  MNRJ.  12 
males,  Chapada,  I-XII  (without  data),  S.  M.  Klages.  Deposited  in  CMNH  1  male.  Para,  Benevides, 
X-1918,  S.  M.  Klages.  Deposited  in  CMNH.  1  female,  Mato  Grosso,  Itaum,  Dourados,  III- 1974,  M. 
Alvarenga.  Deposited  in  AMNH.  1  male,  Goyaz,  Campinas,  XII- 1935,  Aorgmeier,  Lopes  and  Car- 
valho. Deposited  in  MNRJ.  1  male,  Para,  Belem,  Mocambo,  31-1-1980,  M.  F.  Torres.  Deposited  in 
INPA.  Ecuador:  2  males,  Coca  on  Rio  Napo,  Napo-Pastaza  Prov.,  V-1965.  Deposited  in  AMNH.  1 
male,  Napo-Pastaza,  Shushufindi  SE  of  Aguarico,  150-200  m,  2-X-1977,  L.  E.  Pena.  Deposited  in 
AMNH.  Paraguay:  1  female,  Villarica,  X  (without  data),  F.  Schade.  Deposited  in  AMNH.  Peru:  1 
male,  Departamento  Junin,  Estancia  Naranjal,  San  Ramon,  1000  m,  20-27-VII-1965,  P.  and  B. 
Wygodzinsky.  Deposited  in  AMNH.  1  male,  Departamento  Junin,  San  Ramon  de  Pangoa,  2-III-1972, 
R.  T.  and  J.  C.  Schuh.  Deposited  in  UNAM.  1  male,  Vilcanota  (without  data).  Deposited  in  HMNH. 
Trinidad:  1  male,  Arima,  Blanchisseuse  Rd.,  16  km  N  Arima,  650  m,  30-111-1987,  M.  E.  Carter,  E.  R. 
Hoebeke  and  J.  K.  Liebherr.  Deposited  in  CUIC.  1  male,  Cumoto  (without  data),  W.  S.  Brooks. 
Deposited  in  AMNH.  Suriname:  2  males,  Sipaliwini,  12-VI-1963,  P.  H.  van  Doesburg.  Deposited  in 
RNHL.  Venezuela:  1  male,  Bolivar,  km  143  El  Dorado-Santa  Elena,  1200  m,  18-X-1972,  J.  and  B. 
Bechyne.  Deposited  in  UNAM. 

Trachelium  formosus,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  2,  4,  6) 

Description.  Male  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration.  Head,  pronotum,  scutellum,  and  clavus  shiny 
chestnut  orange;  antennal  segments  I  to  III  orange,  IV  dark  brown  with  basal  joint  dark  yellow; 
humeral  spines  black,  scutellar  spine  creamy  yellow  with  apex  black;  corium  dull  chestnut  orange 
with  veins  paler;  hemelytral  membrane  light  ambarine  with  basal  angle  white  (Fig.  4);  connexival 
segments  III  to  V  and  VII  reddish  brown  with  posterior  margin  creamy  yellow,  and  VI  reddish  brown 
with  anterior  border  and  posterior  margin  creamy  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  pale  orange. 
Ventral  coloration.  Shiny  chestnut  orange  with  apex  of  rostral  segment  IV  black,  and  following 
areas  yellow  to  creamy  yellow:  collar,  anterior  border  of  prothorax,  lower  margin  of  acetabulae,  pos- 
terior border  of  mesopleura  and  metapleura,  middle  third  of  abdominal  sterna  III  and  IV,  posterior 
margin  of  abdominal  sternite  V,  posterior  border  of  pleural  sterna  III  to  V  and  VII,  and  anterior  bor- 
der and  posterior  margin  of  VI;  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  dull  chestnut  orange.  Structure: 
Maximal  length  of  antennal  segment  IV  shorter  than  maximal  length  of  antennal  segments  II  and  III 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 21 


together;  rostrum  reaching  posterior  margin  of  metasternum;  each  callus  raised  forming  a  conical 
acute  tubercle;  spines  of  humeral  angles  of  pronotum  hooklike,  stout,  directed  upward,  with  apex 
curved  backward  (Fig.  2);  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  elongate,  slender,  short,  flat,  not  project- 
ing beyond  upper  third  of  metacetabulae;  scutellar  spine  straight,  directed  upward  (Fig.  2  ). 

Female.  Coloration.  Similar  to  male  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration:  Connexival  segments  VIII 
and  IX  reddish  brown  with  posterior  third  of  IX  dull  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  VIII  and  IX, 
and  posterior  margin  of  VII  reddish  brown.  Ventral  coloration:  Head,  rostral  segments  (apex  of  IV 
black),  mesothorax,  and  metathorax  shiny  chestnut  orange  with  acetabulae,  and  posterior  margin  of 
mesopleura,  and  metapleura  yellow;  prothorax  shiny  pale  orange  with  collar,  acetabulae,  and  anteri- 
or border  yellow;  abdominal  sterna  shiny  reddish  brown,  with  middle  third  of  abdominal  sternite  IV, 
and  posterior  margin  of  V  creamy  yellow;  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  dull  chestnut  orange. 

Variation.  1 .  Humeral  spines  shiny  reddish  brown  with  basal  third  chestnut  orange.  2.  Corium 
shiny  chestnut  orange.  3.  Connexival  segment  VI  reddish  brown  or  chestnut  orange.  4.  Acetabulae 
entirely  yellow.  5.  Abdominal  sterna  III  and  IV  entirely  shiny  chestnut  orange. 

Measurements.  Male  given  first,  followed  in  parenthesis  by  those  of  female.  Head  length:  2.28 
mm  (2.36  mm);  width  across  eyes:  1 .92  mm  ( 1 .88  mm);  interocular  space:  1 .04  mm  ( 1 .08  mm);  inte- 
rocellar  space:  0.42  mm  (0.40  mm);  preocular  distance:  1.38  mm  (1.40  mm);  antennal  segments 
lengths:  I,  1.16  mm  (1.08  mm);  II,  1.72  mm  (1.44  mm);  III,  1.72  mm  (1.48  mm);  IV,  3.20  mm  (2.88 
mm).  Pronotal  length:  1.76  mm  (1.52  mm);  maximum  width  of  anterior  lobe:  1.48  mm  (1.40  mm); 
maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe  (without  humeral  spines):  1.88  mm  (1.76  mm).  Scutellar  length: 
1.12  mm  (1.08  mm);  width:  0.76  mm  (0.72  mm).  Total  body  length:  10.48  mm  (9.80  mm). 

Type  material.  Holotype:  male,  Brazil,  Mato  Grosso,  Itaum,  Dourados,  III- 1974,  M.  Alvarenga. 
Deposited  in  AMNH.  Paratypes:  2  males,  Brazil,  Goyaz,  Campinas,  XII- 1935,  Borgmeier  and 
Lopes.  Deposited  in  MNRJ.  1  female,  Brazil,  Sao  Paulo  (without  data).  Deposited  in  HMNH.  3 
males,  2  females,  Brazil,  Chapada,  IV-VII  (without  data).  Deposited  in  CMNH,  and  UNAM.  1  male, 
Bolivia,  Santa  Cruz  de  la  Sierra,  450  m,  XI-1910,  J.  Steinbach.  Deposited  in  CMNH. 

Discussion.  Trachelium  alboapicatus  Distant  and  T.  mimeticum  Breddin  are 
the  only  previous  known  species  with  the  head,  antennal  segments  I  to  III,  and 
legs  shiny  chestnut  orange  to  shiny  orange.  Trachelium  formosus  belongs  to  this 
group  and  is  characterized  by  having  the  spines  of  humeral  angles  hooklike, 
stout,  black  to  reddish  brown,  directed  upward  and  curving  backward  (Fig.  2), 
antennal  segment  IV  dark  brown  with  basal  third  dark  yellow  or  dark  orange,  the 
scutellar  spine  creamy  yellow  with  apex  black,  and  the  corium  without  creamy 
yellow  marks. 

In  T.  alboapicatus  and  T.  mimeticum,  the  humeral  spines  are  needlelike,  and 
shiny  chestnut  orange  (Fig.  1),  the  scutellar  spine  shiny  chestnut  orange,  and  the 
apical  margin  of  corium  or  the  apical  angle  of  corium  creamy  yellow  to  creamy 
white. 

The  abdominal  segments  of  T.  mimeticum  are  dark  brown  to  black,  and  in  T. 
alboapicatus  and  T.  formosus  orange.  In  T.  alboapicatus,  antennal  segment  IV 
has  the  anterior  half  of  the  segment  creamy  yellow  and  the  posterior  half  dark 
brown,  with  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  creamy  yellow,  tuberculate,  clear- 
ly exposed,  and  raised  above  the  body  surface.  In  T.  formosus,  the  metathoracic 
scent  glad  auricle  is  dull  orange  and  flat,  and  antennal  segment  IV  dark  brown 
with  basal  third  dark  yellow  or  dark  orange  (Fig.  6). 

Etymology.  From  the  Latin,  formosus,  meaning  beautifully  formed. 


22 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figure  6.  Dorsal  view  of  Trachelium  formosus  NEW  SPECIES. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2004 23_ 

Trachelium  fulvipes  Herrich-Schaeffer 

Trachelium  fulvipes  Herrich-Schaeffer,  1853:  275. 

Kormilev  (1953)  synonymized  this  species  with  T.  bicolor  Herrich-Schaeffer. 
On  this  contribution  Trachelium  fulvipes  Herrich-Schaeffer  is  resurrected.  They 
can  be  distinguished  from  one  another  by  the  color  of  the  femora,  which  is  black 
in  T.  fulvipes,  and  shiny  orange  in  T.  bicolor. 

Distribution.  This  species  was  described  and  previously  known  only  from  Brazil  (Rio  de 
Janeiro). 

Material  examined.  New  country  records.  Brazil:  1  female,  Goias,  Jatai,  XI- 1972.  Deposited  in 
the  AMNH.  1  female,  Amazonas,  Tabatine,  V-1950,  J.  C.  M.  Carvalho.  Deposited  in  MNRJ.  1  female. 
Minas  Gerais,  Carmo  do  Rio  Claro,  VIII- 1975,  J.  C.  M.  Carvalho.  Deposited  in  MNRJ.  1  macho, 
Mato  Grosso,  Itaum,  Dourados,  III-1974,  M.  Alvarenga.  Deposited  in  the  AMNH.  Paraguay:  1 
female.  Gran  Chaco,  260  km  W  Paraguay  River,  10-VI-1936,  A.  Schulze.  Deposited  in  the  AMNH. 
Peru:  1  female,  Puerto  Bermudes,  Rio  Piohis,  12-VII-1920.  Deposited  in  UNAM. 


Trachelium  lepidus,  NEW  SPECIES 

Description.  Male  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration.  Head,  antennal  segments  I  to  III,  pronorum, 
scutellum,  and  clavus  shiny  orange;  antennal  segment  IV  reddish  brown;  scutellar  spine  yellow  with 
apical  third  orange;  corium  dull  orange  with  anterior  third  of  exocorium,  veins,  apical  margin,  and 
quadrate  spot  near  apical  angle  white;  hemelytral  membrane  dark  ambarine,  with  basal  angle  white; 
connexivum  dark  orange  with  posterior  margin  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  orange.  Ventral 
coloration.  Shiny  orange,  with  apex  of  rostral  segment  IV  black,  and  following  areas  yellow:  poste- 
rior margin  of  mesopleura  and  metapleura,  mesoacetabulae,  middle  third  of  abdominal  sternite  IV, 
posterior  margin  of  V,  and  posterior  margin  of  pleural  sterna  III  to  VII;  metathoracic  scent  gland  auri- 
cle dull  orange.  Structure:  Maximal  length  of  antennal  segment  IV  longer  than  maximal  length  of 
antennal  segments  II  and  III  together;  rostrum  reaching  posterior  margin  of  metasternum;  each  cal- 
lus raised  into  conical  acute  tubercle;  spines  of  humeral  angles  and  scutellar  spine,  large,  needlelike. 
and  directed  upward;  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  elongate,  slender,  flat,  curving  anteriorly. 

Female.  Coloration.  Similar  to  male  (holotype).  Connexival  segments  VIII  and  IX,  dorsal  abdom- 
inal segments  VIII  and  IX,  and  genital  plates  shiny  orange. 

Measurements.  Male  given  first,  followed  in  parenthesis  by  those  of  female.  Head  length:  2.08 
mm  (2.32  mm);  width  across  eyes:  1 .58  mm  ( 1 .68  mm);  interocular  space:  0.82  mm  (0.86  mm);  inte- 
rocellar  space:  0.26  mm  (0.24  mm);  preocular  distance:  1.08  mm  (1.34  mm);  antennal  segments 
lengths:  I,  1.40  mm  (1.36  mm);  II,  1.60  mm  (1.56  mm);  III,  1.32  mm  (1.2S  mm);  IV,  3.92mm  (3.36 
mm).  Pronotal  length:  1.44  mm  ( 1.52  mm);  maximum  width  of  anterior  lobe:  1.08  mm  (1.18  mm); 
maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe  (without  humeral  spines):  1.44  mm  (1.48  mm).  Scutellar  length: 
0.80  mm  (0.92  mm);  width:  0.44  mm  (0.52  mm).  Total  body  length:  8.60  mm  (9.00  mm). 

Type  material.  Holotype:  male,  Panama,  Canal  Zone,  Ft.  Davis,  5-VII-1924,  N.  Banks. 
Deposited  in  AMNH.  Paratypes:  2  females,  Panama,  Canal  Zone,  Ft.  Davis,  5-9-VII-1924,  N.  Banks. 
Deposited  in  AMNH,  and  UNAM.  6  males,  5  females,  Panama,  Canal  Zone,  Margarita,  25-28-X- 
1972,  L.  H.  Rolston.  Deposited  in  the  USNM,  and  UNAM.  1  male,  Panama,  Cerro  Campana,  12-1- 
1974,  J.  A.  Slater,  and  J.  Harrington.  Deposited  in  AMNH.  1  male,  Panama,  Canal  Zone,  Madden 
Forest  Res.,  9-1-1974,  J.  A.  Slater,  and  J.  Harrington.  Deposited  in  AMNH.  1  males,  Panama, 
(iamboa,  1 1 -VIII- 1 986,  C.  Riley  Nelson  (Malaise  Trap).  Deposited  in  BYU.  1  female.  Panama,  Canal 
Zone,  Barro  Colorado  Isl.,  24-VII-1963,  D.  Q.  Cavagnaro  and  M.  E.  Irwin.  Deposited  in  CAS.  1 
male,  Panama,  Canal  Zone.  Barro  Colorado,  3-1-1929,  C.  H.  Curran.  Deposited  in  UNAM.  1  female, 
Colombia,  Valle,  Delfina.  400-500  m,  26-VIII-1967,  P.  y  B.  Wygodzinsky.  Deposited  in  AMNH. 

Discussion.  Trachelium  lepidus,  like  T.  alhoapicatus  Distant,  shares  the  fol- 
lowing characters:  head,  antennal  segments  I  to  III,  legs,  and  pronotum  shiny 


24  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


orange.  In  T.  alboapicatus  the  metathoraic  scent  gland  auricle  is  creamy  yellow, 
clearly  tuberculate,  and  raised  above  the  body  surface  (Fig.  3),  the  humeral 
spines  of  pronotum  are  large,  needlelike,  and  directed  obliquely  upward,  the 
scutellar  spine  is  entirely  shiny  orange,  the  basal  angle  of  the  hemelytral  mem- 
brane pale  ambarine,  and  abdominal  sternite  V  yellow,  with  anterior  border  shiny 
orange  with  brown  marks.  In  T.  lepidus,  the  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  is 
orange,  flat,  curving  anteriorly,  and  never  raised,  the  humeral  spines  are  large, 
elongate,  needlelike,  and  clearly  directed  upward,  the  scutellar  spine  yellow  with 
apical  third  orange,  the  basal  angle  of  the  hemelytral  membrane  white,  and 
abdominal  sternite  V  shiny  orange  with  only  the  posterior  margin  yellow. 
Etymology.  From  the  Latin,  lepidus,  meaning  pleasant,  elegant. 


Trachelium  limitatus,  NEW  SPECIES 

Description.  Male  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration.  Head,  antennal  segments  I  to  III,  pronotum, 
clavus,  connexivum,  and  dorsal  abdominal  segments  shiny  to  dull  orange;  antennal  segment  IV 
brownish  orange  with  basal  third  yellow;  humeral  spines  reddish  brown;  corium  dull  orange  with 
posterior  third  of  costal  margin  and  small  dot  at  middle  third  of  endocorium  yellow;  hemelytral  mem- 
brane pale  ambarine.  Ventral  coloration.  Head,  rostral  segments  (apex  of  IV  black),  and  thorax 
orange  with  yellow  reflections;  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  yellow;  legs  and  abdominal  sterna 
orange.  Structure:  Maximal  length  of  antennal  segment  IV  longer  than  maximal  length  of  antennal 
segments  II  and  III  together;  rostrum  reaching  middle  third  of  metasternum;  each  callus  raised  into 
conical  acute  tubercle;  humeral  spines  large,  needlelike,  and  directed  obliquely  backward;  metatho- 
racic scent  gland  auricle  elongate,  slender,  flat,  not  projecting  beyond  upper  third  of  metacetabulae; 
scutellar  spine  tiny,  reduced  to  small  conical  expansion. 

Female.  Unknown. 

Measurements.  Male.  Head  length:  2.48  mm;  width  across  eyes:  1.78  mm;  interocular  space: 
0.96  mm;  interocellar  space:  0.34  mm;  preocular  distance:  1.50  mm;  antennal  segments  lengths:  I, 
2.00  mm;  II,  2.16  mm;  III,  1.84  mm;  IV,  4.20  mm.  Pronotal  length:  1.64  mm;  maximum  width  of 
anterior  lobe:  1.42  mm;  maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe  (without  humeral  spines):  1.94  mm. 
Scutellar  length:  1.20  mm;  width:  0.76  mm.  Total  body  length:  11.63  mm. 

Type  material.  Holotype:  male,  Argentina,  Misiones,  Bernardo  de  Irigoyen,  12-XI-1973,  Esco- 
bar y  Claps.  Deposited  in  UNAM.  Paratype.  1  male,  Argentina,  Misiones,  Posadas,  1972,  D. 
Carpintero.  Deposited  in  UNAM. 

Discussion.  This  species  can  be  distinguished  by  the  following  combination 
of  characters:  dorsum  of  abdominal  segments  orange,  scutellar  spine  tiny,  re- 
duced to  small  expansion,  basal  angle  of  hemelytral  membrane  pale  ambarine, 
and  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  elongate,  and  flat.  In  T.  mimelicum  Breddin 
the  must  similar  species,  the  dorsal  abdominal  segments  are  black,  the  scutellar 
spine  elongate,  needlelike  and  directed  upward,  the  basal  angle  of  the  hemelytral 
membrane  white,  and  the  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  is  raised  into  a  small 
rounded  tubercle. 

Etymology.  Named  for  its  limited  known  distribution. 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 25_ 

Trachelium  mimeticum  Breddin 

Trachelium  mimeticum  Breddin,  1904:  147. 

This  species  is  characterized  by  having  the  head,  antennal  segments  I  to  III, 
and  legs  orange  to  chestnut  orange;  the  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  dark  yel- 
low, tuberculate  and  raised  above  body  surface;  the  humeral  spine  of  pronotum 
reddish  brown,  large,  needlelike  and  directed  obliquely  backward;  the  scutellar 
spine  shiny  orange  and  directed  upward  with  the  apex  curving  backward;  the  and 
dorsal  abdominal  segments  black;  hemelytral  membrane  pale  ambarine,  with 
pale  blue  reflections  and  with  basal  angle  whitish,  and  each  callus  with  an  acute 
conical  tubercle. 

Distribution.  This  species  was  originally  described  from  Bolivia  and  apparently  has  not  been 
recorded  since  that  time. 

Material  examined.  Syntypes:  2  males,  Bolivia,  Yungas  de  la  Paz.  Deposited  in  DEU. 


Trachelium  secularis,  NEW  SPECIES 

Description.  Male  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration.  Head,  antennal  segments  I  to  III,  pronotum, 
scutellum,  and  clavus  shiny  orange;  antennal  segment  IV  reddish  brown;  humeral  spines  of  prono- 
tum and  scutellar  spine  reddish  brown;  corium  pale  orange  brown,  with  following  areas  white:  trans- 
versal fascia  near  middle  third,  small  dot  behind  the  fascia  and  close  to  apical  margin,  middle  third 
of  apical  margin,  and  quadrate  spot  near  apical  angle;  hemelytral  membrane  pale  ambarine;  connex- 
ival  segments  III  and  IV  dark  orange  with  upper  margin  yellow,  V  to  VII  dark  orange;  dorsal  abdom- 
inal segments  orange.  Ventral  coloration.  Shiny  orange  with  apex  of  rostral  segment  IV  black,  and 
mesoacetabulae,  metacetabulae,  posterior  margin  of  metapleura,  and  posterior  margin  of  abdominal 
sterna  IV  and  V  creamy  yellow  to  yellow.  Structure:  Maximal  length  of  antennal  segment  IV  longer 
than  maximal  length  of  antennal  segments  II  and  III  together;  rostrum  reaching  posterior  margin  of 
metasternum;  each  callus  raised  into  an  acute  conical  tubercle;  spines  of  humeral  angles  large, 
needlelike,  directed  obliquely  backward;  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  short,  flat,  straight,  not 
projected  beyond  the  upper  third  of  metacetabulae;  scutellar  spine  straight,  needlelike,  directed 
upward. 

Female.  Coloration.  Similar  to  male  (holotype).  Connexival  segment  III  and  IV  yellow  to  pale 
orange,  V  and  VI  yellow  with  anterior  third  dark  chestnut  orange,  and  VII  to  IX  dark  chestnut  orange; 
abdominal  segments  VIII  and  IX  dark  chestnut  orange;  abdominal  sterna  yellow  to  pale  orange  with 
anterior  margin  of  sternite  IV  and  V,  and  genital  plates  chestnut  orange. 

Measurements.  Male  given  first,  followed  in  parenthesis  by  those  of  female.  Head  length:  2.72 
mm  (2.34  mm);  width  across  eyes:  1.92  mm  (1.72  mm);  interocular  space:  0.92  mm  (0.88  mm);  inte- 
rocellar  space:  0.40  mm  (0.28  mm);  preocular  distance:  1.56  mm  (1.22  mm);  antennal  segments 
lengths:  I,  1.92  mm  (1.48  mm);  II,  1.68  mm  (1.56  mm);  III.  1.50  mm  (1.52  mm);  IV,  5.07  mm  (3.56 
mm).  Pronotal  length:  1.84  mm  (1.60  mm);  maximum  width  of  anterior  lobe:  1.36  mm  (1.24  mm); 
maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe  (without  humeral  spines):  1.88  mm  (1.72  mm).  Scutellar  length: 
1.04  mm  (0.96  mm);  width:  0.72  mm  (0.60  mm).  Total  body  length:  1 1.27  mm  ( 10.05  mm). 

Type  material.  Holotype:  male,  Trinidad,  W.  I.,  Arima  Valley,  800'- 1 200'.  1 0-22-1 V- 1964,  Rozen 
and  Wygodzinsky.  Deposited  in  AMNH.  Paratypes:  2  females,  Panama,  Canal  Zone,  Corozal,  22-1- 
1929,  C.  H.  Curran.  Deposited  in  AMNH,  and  UNAM.  1  male,  Panama,  Code,  El  Valle,  500-600  m, 
VI I- 1981,  N.  L.  H.  Krauss.  Deposited  in  UNAM. 

Discussion.  This  species  resembles  T.  alboapicatus.  Distant  in  having  the 
head,  antennal  segments  I  to  III,  scutellum  including  the  spine,  and  legs  shiny 
orange;  the  humeral  spines  of  pronotum  large,  needlelike,  and  directed  oblique- 


26  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ly  upward;  the  basal  angle  of  the  hemelytral  membrane  pale  ambarine;  and  the 
total  length  of  antennal  segment  IV  longer  than  length  of  antennal  segments  II 
and  III  together. 

Trachelium  secularis  can  be  distinguished  by  having  the  humeral  spines  and 
antennal  segment  IV  entirely  reddish  brown,  and  the  metathoracic  scent  gland 
auricle  orange,  flat,  straight,  not  curving  anteriorly  or  posteriorly,  and  not  raised 
above  the  body  surface.  In  T.  alboapicatus,  the  humeral  spines  are  shiny  orange, 
antennal  segment  IV  is  reddish  brown  with  anterior  third  yellow,  and  metathoracic 
scent  gland  auricle  creamy  yellow  and  remarkably  raised  above  the  body  surface. 

Trachelium  limitatus  has  the  scutellar  spine  yellow  with  the  apical  third 
orange,  the  basal  angle  of  the  hemelytral  membrane  white,  and  the  metathoracic 
scent  gland  auricle  curving  anteriorly. 

Etymology.  The  specific  epithet  means  "wordly,"  referring  to  the  comparatively  broad  distribu- 
tion of  this  species. 

Trachelium  spectabile  Bergroth 

(Figs.  1,5,7) 

Trachelium  spectabile  Bergroth  (in  Poppius  and  Bergroth),  1920-1921:  68-69. 

Redescription.  Male.  Dorsal  coloration.  Head  shiny  orange  with  interocular  space  mostly  black; 
antennal  segments  I  to  III  shiny  chestnut  orange,  IV  dark  brownish  orange;  pronotum,  scutellum,  and 
clavus  black;  humeral  spines  and  scutellar  spine  dark  reddish  brown;  corium  with  basal  third  and  api- 
cal angle  dark  yellow  with  punctures  chestnut  orange,  middle  third  reddish  brown  with  upper  and 
lower  area  whitish  and  punctures  chestnut  orange;  hemelytral  membrane  with  basal  half  brown  with 
angle  white,  and  apical  half  pale  ambarine,  with  veins  darker  (Fig.  5);  connexival  segments  III  and  IV 
dark  reddish  brown  with  upper  margin  yellow,  V  to  VII  dark  reddish  brown  with  upper  border  yel- 
low; dorsal  abdominal  segments  black.  Ventral  coloration.  Head  shiny  orange;  rostral  segments 
shiny  chestnut  orange  with  apex  of  IV  black;  thorax  black  with  anterior  margin  of  prothorax,  acetab- 
ulae,  and  upper  and  posterior  margin  of  metathorax  yellow;  legs  dark  reddish  brown;  metathoracic 
scent  gland  auricle  dark  orange  brown;  abdominal  sterna  dark  reddish  brown  with  posterior  margin  of 
abdominal  sterna  III  to  V,  and  middle  third  of  VII  yellow;  pleural  margin  III,  IV,  and  VII  yellow,  V 
dark  reddish  brown  with  two  yellow  spots  at  posterior  third,  VI  reddish  brown  with  one  yellow  spot 
near  middle  third.  Structure:  Maximal  length  of  antennal  segment  IV  clearly  longer  than  maximal 
length  of  antennal  segments  II  and  III  together;  rostrum  reaching  posterior  margin  of  metasternum; 
each  callus  raised  into  an  acute  conical  tubercle;  spines  of  humeral  angles  large,  needlelike,  directed 
obliquely  backward  (Fig.  1);  scutellar  spine  large,  needlelike,  directed  upward;  metathoracic  scent 
gland  auricle  short,  broadening  at  distal  end,  not  extending  beyond  the  upper  third  of  metacetabulae. 

Female.  Coloration.  Similar  to  male.  Connexival  segments  III  to  V  yellow,  VI  and  VII  pale 
brown  with  upper  border  yellow,  VIII  and  IX  dark  reddish  brown;  abdominal  segments  VIII  and  IX 
dark  reddish  brown;  pleural  margins  III  to  VII  yellow;  genital  plates  dark  reddish  brown. 

Variation.  This  species  is  quite  variable  in  regards  to  head  color.  In  some  individuals  the  head  is 
entirely  black  or  shiny  orange,  or  shiny  orange  with  the  interocular  space  black,  and  antennal  segment 
IV  dark  brownish  except  in  one  specimen  which  is  bicolored  (black  with  basal  third  dark  orange). 

Measurements.  Male  given  first,  followed  in  parenthesis  by  those  of  female.  Head  length:  2.84 
mm  (2.96  mm);  width  across  eyes:  2.10  mm  (2.16  mm);  interocular  space:  1.10  mm  (1.24  mm);  inte- 
rocellar  space:  0.40  mm  (0.38  mm);  preocular  distance:  1.52  mm  (1.50  mm);  antennal  segments 
lengths:  I,  2.20  mm  (2.20  mm);  II,  1.84  mm  (2.12  mm);  HI,  1.76  mm  (mutilated);  IV,  6.20  mm  (muti- 
lated). Pronotal  length:  1.88  mm  (2.12  mm);  maximum  width  of  anterior  lobe:  1.86  mm  (1.90  mm); 
maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe  (without  humeral  spines):  2.18  mm  (2.20  mm).  Scutellar  length: 
1.20  mm  (1.28  mm);  width:  0.82  mm  (0.84  mm).  Total  body  length:  12.15  mm  (13.18  mm). 

Distribution.  This  species  was  described  from  Peru,  without  any  other  reference. 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 27_ 

Material  examined.  New  country  records.-  1  female,  Bolivia,  Nor  Yungas,  Caranavi,  9-VI- 1 93 1 . 
P.  Denier.  Deposited  in  UNAM.  2  males,  Brazil,  Chapada,  III-IV  (without  data).  Deposited  in  CMNH 
and  UNAM.  1  male,  Peru,  Marcapata  (without  data).  Deposited  in  HMNH.  1  male,  Peru,  Pachitea 
(without  data).  Deposited  in  HMNH. 

Discussion.  Similar  to  T.  mimeticum  Breddin,  with  the  dorsal  abdominal  seg- 
ments black,  head  in  ventral  view  shiny  orange,  and  hemelytral  membrane  clearly 
bicolored,  with  basal  half  brown  with  angle  white,  and  apical  half  pale  ambarine. 

In  T.  mimeticum,  the  head  in  dorsal  view,  the  pronotum,  scutellum,  clavus, 
corium,  legs,  and  ventral  surface  are  almost  entirely  shiny  orange  and  in  T. 
spectabile  Bergroth  are  almost  black. 

Trachelium  tessellatus  Distant 

Truc/icHum  ti'.s.wlliiius  Distant,  1892:  373-374. 

This  species  seems  to  be  most  closely  related  to  the  Brazilian  T.  bicolor 
Herrich-Schaeffer  and  T.  fulvipes  Herrich-Schaeffer,  with  which  it  agrees  in  the 
black  color  of  head,  pronotum  and  scutellum  (base  of  scutellar  spine  yellow), 
plus  the  antennal  segment  IV  black  to  dark  reddish  brown. 

In  T.  bicolor  the  femora  are  shiny  orange  to  shiny  chestnut  orange,  whereas  in 
the  other  two  species  the  femora  are  black  with  or  without  a  yellow  median  ring. 
In  T.  tessellatus  Distant  the  basal  joint  of  femora  is  black  to  dark  reddish  brown, 
the  body  size  longer,  and  the  distribution  is  from  southern  Mexico  to  Colombia. 
Trachelium  fulvipes  is  a  shorter  species,  with  the  basal  joint  of  femora  yellow, 
and  it  is  occurs  throughtout  Brazil,  Paraguay,  and  Peru. 

Distribution.  This  species  was  originally  described  from  Panama  (David,  Bugaba,  and  Volcan  de 
Chiriqui)  and  has  been  reported  only  from  there. 

Material  examined.  Syntype:  male,  Panama,  Bugaba,  Champion.  Deposited  in  BMNH.  New 
country  records.  Colombia:  1  male,  1  female,  Minca,  V-VI-1919  (without  data).  Deposited  in 
CMNH.  Costa  Rica:  1  male,  Provincia  Puntarenas,  Estacion  Bijagual,  500  m,  V-1994,  J.  Saborio. 
Deposited  in  INBIO.  1  male,  2  females,  Provincia  Puntarenas,  Estacion  Carara,  Res.  Biol.  Carara, 
200  m,  I-II-1990,  R.  Zuniga.  Deposited  in  INBIO  and  UNAM.  2  females,  Provincia  Puntarenas, 
Estacion  Quebrada  Bonita,  Res.  Biol.  Carara,  50  m,  XII- 1992,  R.  Guzman.  Deposited  in  INBIO. 
Panama:  1  male,  I  female.  Canal  Zone,  Madden  Forest  Res.,  7-1-1974,  J.  A.  Slater  and  J.  Harrington. 
Deposited  in  UNAM.  1  female,  Code  Prov.,  HI  Valle  (La  Mesa),  13-1-1974,  J.  A.  Slater  and  J. 
Harrington.  Deposited  in  UNAM. 

Trachelium  ventus,  NEW  SPECIES 

Description.  Female  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration.  Head,  pronotum  including  humeral  spines, 
scutellum  including  scutellar  spine,  and  clavus  shiny  dark  reddish  brown;  antennal  segments  I  to  III 
shiny  reddish  brown,  IV  reddish  brown  with  basal  third  yellow;  corium  dark  brown  with  some  cen- 
tral pale  yellow  white  tessellate  markings,  apical  margin  white,  and  apical  angle  dark  brown;  heme- 
lytral membrane  pale  ambarine  with  blueish  green  reflections,  veins  darker;  connexival  segments  III, 
and  V  to  VII  reddish  brown  with  posterior  border  yellow,  IV  yellow  with  basal  border  brown;  dorsal 
abdominal  segments  reddish  brown.  Neutral  coloration.  Shiny  reddish  brown  to  black  with  collar, 
acetabulae,  posterior  margin  of  metapleura,  nietathoracic  scent  gland  auricle,  middle  third  of  abdom- 
inal sternite  III.  and  posterior  margin  of  abdominal  sternite  V  yellow;  rostral  segment  I  dark  reddish 
brown  with  apical  joint  chestnut  orange,  and  II  to  IV  chestnut  orange  with  apex  of  IV  black;  coxae, 
trochanter  and  femora  reddish  brown,  and  tibiae  and  tarsi  dark  chestnut  orange;  abdominal  pleural 
margin  III  reddish  brown  with  two  spots,  and  posterior  border  yellow,  IV  yellow  with  anterior  bor- 


28 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figure  7.  Dorsal  view  of  Trachelium  spectahile  Bergroth. 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 29 


der  brown,  V  reddish  brown  with  posterior  margin  yellow,  VI  and  VII  reddish  brown  with  two  yel- 
low spots,  and  VIII  and  IX  reddish  brown.  Structure:  Maximal  length  of  antennal  segment  IV  longer 
than  maximal  length  of  antennal  segments  II  and  III  together;  rostrum  reaching  posterior  margin  of 
metasternum;  each  callus  remarkably  raised  into  a  large  acute  needlelike  spine;  spines  at  humeral 
angles  large,  needlelike  and  recurved  backward;  scutellar  spine  long,  erect,  and  needlelike;  metatho- 
racic  scent  gland  auricle  bilobate.  and  laterally  raised  above  body  surface. 

Male.  Unknown. 

Measurements.  Female.  Head  length:  2.40  mm;  width  across  eyes:  1.92  mm;  interocular  space: 
0.82  mm;  interocellar  space:  0.26  mm;  preocular  distance:  1.56  mm;  antennal  segments  lengths:  I, 
2.12  mm;  II,  2.20  mm;  III,  1.80  mm;  IV,  4.52  mm.  Pronotal  length:  1.88  mm;  maximum  width  of 
anterior  lobe:  1.38  mm;  maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe  (without  humeral  spines):  1.96  mm. 
Scutellar  length:  0.82  mm;  width:  0.68  mm.  Total  body  length:  1 1.85  mm. 

Type  material.  Holotype:  female,  French  Guiana,  Mana  River,  VI-1917.  Deposited  in  CMNH. 
Paratypes:  1  female,  French  Guiana,  V-1917.  Deposited  in  UNAM.  1  female,  French  Guiana,  Saul, 
18-VHI-1881.  Deposited  in  MNHN. 

Discussion.  This  species  is  similar  to  T.  alvarengai  in  having  antennal  seg- 
ment IV  bicolored  and  longer  than  the  maximum  length  of  antennal  segments  II 
and  III  combined,  and  the  head,  pronotum,  and  scutellum  black  to  reddish  brown. 

In  T.  ventus,  the  scutellar  spine  is  entirely  reddish  brown,  the  metathoracic 
scent  gland  auricle  bilobate  and  raised  above  the  body  surface,  the  tubercle  of 
each  calli  remarkably  exposed  and  acute,  and  the  hind  femur  entirely  reddish 
brown.  Trachelium  alvarengai  has  the  scutellar  spine  black  to  reddish  brown 
with  basal  joint  yellow,  the  metathoracic  scent  gland  auricle  elongate,  flat,  not 
bilobate  or  bifurcate,  the  tubercle  of  each  calli  stout  and  short,  and  basal  joint  of 
hind  femur  yellow. 

Etymology.  From  the  Latin,  ventus,  meaning  wind. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  extend  my  sincere  gratitude  and  appreciation  to  the  following  individuals  and  institutions:  Mick 
Webb  (The  Natural  History  Museum,  London,  England),  Randall  T.  Schuh  (American  Museum  of 
Natural  History,  New  York),  Norman  Penny  and  Vincent  Lee  (California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San 
Francisco,  California),  John  E.  Rawlins  and  Robert  L.  Davidson  (Carnegie  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  Pittsburgh,  PA),  E.  R.  Hoebecke  and  J.  K.  Liebherr  (Cornell  University,  Insect  Collection. 
Ithaca,  New  York),  Eckhard  Groll  (Deutsches  Entomologisches  Institut,  Eberswalde.  Germany),  Phil 
Parrillo  (Field  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Chicago,  Illinois),  Dominique  Pluot  (Museum  National 
D'  Histoire  Naturelle,  Paris,  France),  Tamas  Vasarhelyi  (Hungarian  Natural  History  Museum,  Buda- 
pest, Flungary),  Jesus  Ugalde  (Institute  Nacional  de  Biodiversidad.  Heredia.  Costa  Rica),  Jan  van  Tol 
(Rijksmuseum  van  Naturlijke  Histoire,  Leiden,  Netherlands),  Augusto  L.  Henriques  and  Jose 
Albcrtino  Rafael  (Institute  de  Pesquizas  da  Amazonia,  Manaus,  Brazil),  Richard  Baumann  (Brigham 
Young  University,  Monte  L.  Bean  Life  Sciences  Museum.  Provo,  Utah),  the  late  Jose  Candido  Melo 
Carvalho  (Museum  National,  Rio  de  Janeiro,  Brasil),  Thomas  J.  Henry  (Systematic  Entomology 
Laboratory,  USDA,  c/o  United  States  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution, 
Washington,  D.C.)  and  Wilford  J.  Hanson  (Utah  State  University,  Logan,  Utah).  Special  thanks  to 
Ernesto  Barrera  and  El  via  Esparza  (Instituto  de  Biologia,  UNAM)  for  the  drawings. 


30  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Brailovsky,  H.  and  R.  Zurbia  Flores.  1979.  Contribucion  al  estudio  de  los  Hemiptera-Heteroptera 
de  Mexico:  XVII.  Revision  de  la  Familia  Alydidae  Amyot  y  Serville.  Anales  del  Institute  de 
Biologia,  Universidad  Nacional  Autonoma  de  Mexico,  Serie  Zoologia  50  (l):255-339. 

Breddin,  G.   1904.  Neue  Rhynchotenausbeute  aus  Sudamerika.  Societas  Entomological 8: 147. 

Distant,  W.  L.  1881-1893.  Biologia  Centrali-Americana.  Heteroptera  I.  London,  England,  United 
Kingdom.  159,373-374. 

Herrich-Schaeffer,  G.  A.  W.   1853.  Die  Wanzenartigen  Insecten.  9:274-275,  989-990. 

Kormilev,  N.  A.  1953.  Revision  de  Micrelytrinae  Stal  de  la  Argentina,  con  descripcion  de  un  genero 
y  siete  especies  nuevas  de  Argentina,  Brasil  y  Bolivia  (Hemiptera,  Coriscidae).  Revista  de  la 
Sociedad  Entomologica  Argentina  16:  49-66. 

Poppius,  B.,  und  E.  Bergroth.  1920-1921.  Beitrage  zur  kenntnis  der  myrmecoiden  Heteropteren. 
Annales  Musei  Nationalis  Hungarici  18:31-88. 

Schaefer,  C.  W.  1996.  A  new  species  ofCydamus,  with  a  key  to  the  species  of  the  genus  (Hemip- 
tera: Alydidae).  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  89(1):37-40. 

Schaefer,  C.  W.  2004.  Key  to  the  genera  of  New  World  Alydidae  (Hemiptera:  Heteroptera).  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  106(2):280-287. 

Stal,  C.  1870.  Enumeratio  Hemipterorum  1.  Hemiptera.  Kongliga  Svenska  Vetenskaps  Akademiens 
Handlingar  9(1):  1-232. 


CORRIGENDUM 

On  a  recently  published  paper  [Freytag,  Entomological  News  114(4): 
181-186],  the  binomen  Agallia  pecki,  was  misspelled  as  A.  peck  only 
once,  in  the  Abstract  (page  181).  Everywhere  else  in  the  paper,  the 
binomen  was  spelled  Agallia  pecki  or  A.  pecki,  as  intended  by  the 
author.  The  spelling  "A.  peck"  is  an  incorrect  original  spelling  and  we 
are  herein  correcting  it  (Article  32.5,  International  Code  of  Zoological 
Nomenclature,  Fourth  Edition,  1999,  "with  effect  from  1  January 
2000"). 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 3J_ 

REDESCRIPTION  OF  NOTHOBRYA  SCHUBARTI 
ARLE,  1961  (COLLEMBOLA,  ENTOMOBRYOMORPHA)1 

Enrique  Baquero2,  Rafael  Jordana2,  and  Kenneth  Christiansen1 

ABSTRACT:  Three  paratypes  of  Nothohrya  sclniharti  Arle,  1961  were  examined  in  connection  with 
a  forthcoming  description  of  a  new  genus  of  Entomobryidae.  Some  of  the  features  observed  by  Arle 
in  1961,  appeared  similar  to  those  of  the  new  genus.  These  included:  small  size,  color,  the  presence 
of  PAO,  a  falciform  mucro,  the  trochanteral  organ  and  the  body  setae.  Observation  of  a  specimen  with 
SEM  allowed  us  to  see  the  PAO  and  the  other  characteristics  described  by  Arle  in  more  detail,  but 
other  features  not  described  by  him  were  seen  which  indicate  that  the  genus  belongs  in  subfamily 
Orchesellinae. 

KEY  WORDS:  Collembola,  Nothobiya,  Orchesellinae,  Entomobryomorpha. 

Arle  ( 1 96 1 )  described  the  genus  Nothobiya  of  the  family  Entomobryidae  from 
Brazil  which  was  characterized  by  a  lack  of  scales,  presence  of  a  postantennal 
organ,  and  a  falcate  mucro.  Although  the  genus  was  placed  with  other  Ento- 
mobryidae, its  taxonomic  placement  has  remained  unclear  and  no  subsequent 
records  of  the  genus  have  been  made.  Barra  (1999)  examined  type  specimens  of 
Nothobiya  and  clearly  showed  it  to  be  distinct  from  his  genus  Capbtya.  Due  to 
the  kindness  of  Dr.  Cleide  de  Mendonca  (Museu  Nacional,  Departamento  de 
Entomologia,  Universidade  Federal  do  Rio  de  Janeiro,  Brazil)  we  were  able  to 
examine  three  paratypes  of  this  unusual  species  and  clearly  establish  that  the 
genus  belongs  in  the  subfamily  Orchesellinae  of  the  family  Entomobryidae. 

METHODS 

The  specimens  were  preserved  in  ethyl  alcohol,  apparently  in  good  condition 
(Fig.  1),  but  they  were  very  fragile.  One  specimen  was  mounted  on  slide  using 
Hoyer's  medium;  another,  without  cleaning  due  to  its  fragility,  was  dehydrated 
using  an  ethanol  series  followed  by  critical-point  drying  in  CO2,  mounted  on  an 
aluminium  SEM  stub,  and  coated  in  Argon  atmosphere  with  16  nm  of  gold  in  an 
Emitech  K550  sputter-coater.  SEM  observations  were  made  in  a  Zeiss  DSM 
940A  with  a  new  digital  image  capture  (Point  Electronic  GmbH,  Germany).  Al- 
though the  animal  is  much  wrinkled,  the  photographs  have  been  included  in  this 
paper  since  they  are  informative.  Some  characteristics  observed  under  both  the 
light  microscope  and  SEM  are  added  to  Arle's  1961  description. 


1  Received  on  May  19,  2004.  Accepted  on  May  21,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Zoology  and  Ecology,  University  of  Navarra,  P.O.  Box  177,  31080  Pamplona,  Na- 
varra,  Spain.  E-mail:  ebaquero@unav.es. 

'  Corresponding  author:  Grinnell  College,  Grinncll  \.\  501 12  USA.  E-mail:  christak(a  grinnell.edu. 

Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


32  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Genus  Nothobrya  Arle,  1961 

Diagnosis:  The  genus  differs  from  other  scaleless  Orchesellinae  by  a  combina- 
tion of  falcate  mucro,  postantennal  organ  and  curved  hook-like  labral  papillae. 

Nothobrya  schubarti  Arle,  1961 

(Figs.  1-8) 

Body  length:  Excluding  appendages:  1.5-2.0  mm  (according  to  Arle),  0.95  mm  and  1.16  mm 
respectively  for  the  slide  mounted  and  the  ethyl  alcohol  preserved  specimens  we  studied. 

Color:  Ground  color  of  body  pale  yellow,  with  blue  pigment  on  distal  part  of  antennal  segment  I, 
final  half  of  antennal  segments  II-III,  distal  two  thirds  of  antennal  segment  IV,  and  bands  on  the  ante- 
rior half  of  all  tergites,  coxae  and  trochanters  (Fig.  1 ). 
Cuticle:  Body  seen  under  SEM  with  dense  reticular  pattern  (Fig.  7).  Scales  absent. 

Head:  Antennae  six  segmented  with  both  the  first  and  third  segments  very  small  (Figs.  2-3).  Length 
in  mm  of  segments  1-6:  0.02:0.05:0.01:0.09:0.12:0.17  respectively.  Ommatidia  8+8,  finely  reticulated 
with  A  and  B  larger  than  the  others.  PAO  is  a  vesicle  (15x5  micrometers),  narrowed  in  its  inner  side, 
situated  in  front  and  lateral  to  eyes  A  and  B.  In  the  specimens  we  saw  the  PAO  is  distorted  as  is  the  rest 
of  the  body  (Fig.  4).  Labral  formula:  4/554  (Fig.  5),  with  labral  papillae  hook-like  (Fig.  6). 

Abdomen:  Abdominal  tergite  IV  1.26,  1.8  times  longer  than  abdominal  tergite  III. 

Chaetotaxy:  Large  macrosetae  present  on  head,  thoracic  segments  and  abdominal  segment  I,  with 
pointed  tips  (type  two  of  Christiansen,  1958).  Macrosetae  shorter  and  very  robust  on  abdominal  seg- 
ment I-VI,  with  clear  barbules.  Mesosetae  of  different  size,  with  barbs  that  give  them  a  pubescent 
appearance.  Bothriotricha  2-3-2  on  abdominal  segments  II-IV  respectively,  as  is  characteristic  of 
almost  all  Entomobryidae  (Szeptycki,  1979). 

Tenaculum:  With  4  plus  4  teeth,  and  two  setae  on  the  corpus. 

Furcula:  Denies  ringed  (Fig.  7)  on  basal  three  quarters,  with  the  final  portion  narrowed  and  striat- 
ed transversally.  Mucro  falcate  without  basal  spine. 

Leg:  Trochanteral  organ  with  three  or  four  smooth  setae. 

Foot  complex:  Tenent  hair  truncate.  Pretarsus  with  a  single  short  blunt  seta.  Claw  elongate,  with 
the  two  teeth  of  the  internal  edges  very  basal,  and  without  unpaired  distal  tooth  in  the  two  specimens 
we  observed.  Unguiculus  with  four  lamellae  but  the  external  two  are  very  narrow  and  fused  about  two 
thirds  of  the  way  from  the  base  to  the  apex  of  the  unguiculus.  The  two  inner  lamellae  fused  near  the 
apex  (Fig.  8). 

Type-locality:  Brazil,  Parnaiba  (Piaui),  Fazenda  Lama  Preta,  "numerosos  ex.  sobre  a  lama  e  no 
"mud-crack"  em  volta  da  lagoa",  XI.  1960.  R.  Arle  leg.  Otto  Schubart  found  three  specimens  from 
Pernambuco  (Riacho  Terra  Nova,  5. IX.  1937).  Material  deposited  at  Museu  Nacional,  Universidade 
Federal  do  Rio  de  Janeiro. 

Remarks:  The  PAO  of  TV.  schubarti  was  described  by  Arle  as  a  vestigial  vesi- 
cle. Barra  (1999)  described  it  as  a  vesicle  with  a  cavity  on  the  top,  but  probably 
this  observation  resulted  from  the  poor  condition  of  the  material  he  saw,  long  in 
ethyl  alcohol  and  collapsed.  The  SEM  examination  of  a  paratype  revealed  that  the 
PAO  is  a  vesicle  larger  than  described  by  Arle;  Figure  4  shows  clearly  the  outline 
of  the  vesicle  and  how  it  is  partially  collapsed  inward.  The  chaetotaxy  and  smooth 
seta  at  the  ventral  side  of  the  final  whorl  of  leg  III  are  similar  to  most  genera  of  the 
Entomobryidae.  The  trochanteral  organ  is  poorly  developed,  as  mentioned  by  Arle, 
with  three  or  four  short  and  smooth  setae.  Arle  mentioned  an  almost  imperceptible 
unpaired  ungual  tooth  but  we  saw  none  under  the  SEM.  The  "type  five"  setae 
(Christiansen,  1958)  are  similar  to  those  seen  in  Entomobtya  (Fig.  7).  The  pecu- 
liar hooked  labral  papillae  are  similar  to  those  seen  in  some  species  of 
Orchesellides,  Heteromurus  and  Dicranorchesella  (Mari  Mutt,  1985).  The  seg- 
mental  ratios  and  the  presence  of  6  segmented  antennae  indicate  that  this  genus  is 
best  placed  in  the  subfamily  Orchesellinae. 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 


33 


Figs.  1-4.  Nothobn'a  schubarti.  1,  Lateral  habitus  showing  coloration,  length  of  bar  =  0.1 
mm.  Figs.  2-4  length  of  bars  =  10  micra.  2,  First  two  antennal  segments,  showing  the  basal 
subdivisions  (SEM).  The  arrows  point  to  the  end  of  the  two  subsegments.  3,  First  anten- 
nal segment,  PAO  and  first  ommatidia  (SEM).  The  arrow  points  to  the  end  of  the  first  sub- 
segment.  4,  Detail  of  collapsed  PAO  (arrow)  and  two  first  ommatidia  (SEM). 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  are  grateful  to  Dr.  Mari  Mutt  (Department  of  Biology,  University  of  Puerto  Rico  at  Mayagiiez) 
for  his  useful  information,  and  to  Dra.  de  Mendoca  (Museu  Nacional,  Departamento  de  Entomologia, 
Universidade  Federal  do  Rio  de  Janeiro,  Brazil)  for  the  loan  of  the  type  material  of  Nothobrya  with 
the  permission  to  prepare  a  specimen  for  SEM.  Stephanie  Peterson  assisted  in  the  preparation  of  the 
manuscript. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Arle,  R.   1961.  Novas  especies  de  colembolas  aquaticas  (Notu  prdmiinar).  Atas  da  Sociedade  de 
Biologia  do  Rio  de  Janeiro  5:34-37. 


34 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figs.  5-8.  Nothobrya  schubarti  (SEM),  length  of  bars  =  5  micra.  5,  Labrum  (square:  Fig. 
6).  6,  Detail  of  hook-like  labral  papillae  (arrow).  7,  Partial  view  of  the  crenulate  dens,  with 
two  setae  to  show  their  barbule  morphology.  8,  Unguiculus  showing  three  of  the  four 
lamellae  and  basal  part  of  the  unguis. 


Barra,  J.-A.  1999.  Un  nouveau  genre  Capbiya  avec  deux  nouvelles  especes  de  la  Province  du  Cap 
(Rep.  Sud  Africaine)  (Collembola:  Entomobryidae).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  Des  Sciences 
Naturelles  de  Belgique  69: 19-24. 

Bellinger,  P.  F.,  K.  A.  Christiansen,  and  F.  Janssens.  1996-2004.  Checklist  of  the  Collembola: 
Families,  http://www.collembola.org/taxa/collembo.htm  [Last  updated  on  2004.03.29  by  Frans 
Janssens]. 

Christiansen,  K.  A.  1958.  The  Nearctic  members  of  the  genus  Entomobrya  (Collembola).  Bulletin 
of  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  118:440-545. 

Mari  Mutt,  J.  A.  1985.  Three  new  species  of  Orchesellides  from  North  Korea  (Collembola: 
Entomobryidae:  Orchesellinae).  International  Journal  of  Entomology,  25(4):297-309. 

Szeptycki,  A.  1979.  Chaetotaxy  of  the  Entomobryidae  and  its  Phylogenetic  Significance,  Morpho- 
systematic  studies  on  Collembola.  IV.  Polska  Akademia  Nauk  Istytut  Zoologiczny  Krakow 
1979:45-47. 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January'  &  February  2004 35_ 

TWO  NEW  SPECIES  OF  HERCOSTOMUS  FROM  CHINA 
(DIPTERA:  DOLICHOPODIDAE)1 

Lili  Zhang:,  Ding  Vang',  and  Ka/uhiro  Masunaga4 

ABSTRACT:  Two  species  from  China  are  described  as  new  to  science:  Hercostomus  (Gymnopter- 
nus)  huangi  sp.  nov.  and  Hercostomus  (Hercostomust  maoershanensis  sp.  nov.  One  new  species- 
group,  Hercostomus  (Gymnopternus)  setifacies-group,  is  proposed.  Keys  are  provided  for  the  species 
of  the  setifacies-group  and  the  longicercus-group  from  China,  and  the  geographic  distribution  of  each 
species  group  is  discussed.  One  new  combination,  Hercostomus  (Gymnopternus)  zhejiangensis 
(Yang,  1997)  comb.  nov.  is  created. 

KEY  WORDS:  Diptera,  Dolichopodidae,  Hercostomus,  China,  new  species. 

The  genus  Hercostomus  is  the  largest  and  most  diversified  genus  in  the  Doli- 
chopodidae with  about  500  known  species  worldwide.  There  were  28  known 
species  from  China  before  1995,  of  which  only  11  species  were  recorded  from 
continental  China  (Dyte  1975,  Negrobov  1991).  Since  1995,  218  species  of  Her- 
costomus have  been  added  to  the  fauna  of  China,  mainly  based  on  the  work  of 
Wei  (1997),  Yang  and  Grootaert  (1999),  Yang  and  Saigusa  (1999,  2000,  200  la- 
d,  2002),  Yang  and  Yang  (1995),  Zhang  and  Yang  (2003).  Up  to  now,  there  are 
246  known  species  in  China. 

In  the  present  paper,  two  species  are  described  as  new  to  science.  One  new 
species-group,  H.  (G.)  setifacies-gmup,  is  proposed.  Keys  are  provided  for  the 
species  of  the  setifacies-group  and  the  longicercus-group  from  China.  A  geo- 
graphic distribution  map  for  each  species  group  is  also  presented.  One  new  com- 
bination Hercostomus  (Gymnopternus)  zhejiangensis  (Yang,  1997)  comb.  nov.  is 
created  for  Phalacrosoma  zhejiangensis  Yang,  1997. 

The  following  abbreviations  are  used:  acr-acrostichal,  ad-anterodorsal,  apv- 
apicoventral,  av-anteroventral,  dc-dorsocentral,  Li-fore  leg,  LH-mid  leg,  LIII- 
hind  leg,  pd-posterodorsal,  pv-posteroventral,  v-ventral. 

Hercostomus  (Gymnopternus)  setifacies  group 

Diagnosis:  Postocular  bristles  black.  Antenna  black;  first  flagellomere  elon- 
gated, at  least  2.0  times  longer  than  wide.  Clypeus  in  both  sexes  with  one  pair  of 
black  strong  bristles.  Cercus  long  and  thick,  longer  than  epandrium. 

This  group  includes  the  following  3  species:  H.  (G.)  huangi  sp.  nov.,  H.  (G.) 
zonalis  Yang,  Yang  and  Li  and  H.  (G.)  \myangensis  Wei.  The  geographical  dis- 
tribution of  these  species  is  shown  on  Figure  1 1. 


1  Received  on  June  1,  2004.  Accepted  on  June  29,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Entomology,  China  Agricultural  University,  Haidian,  Beijing  100094.  China.  E-mail: 
tolily(oJl26.com. 

1  Department  of  Entomology,  China  Agricultural  University,  Haidian,  Beijing  100094,  China.  E-mail: 
dingyang^cau. edu.cn  or  dyangcau(a  yahoo.com.cn.  To  whom  the  correspondence  and  reprint  re- 
quests should  be  addressed. 

4  Lake  Biwa  Museum.  1091  Oroshimo-cho,  Kusatsu-shi.  Shiga,  525-0001  Japan.  E-mail:  moaiu/  Ibrn. 
gojp. 

Mailed  on  November  12.  2004 


36  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Key  to  the  species  of  the  Hercostomus  (Gymnopternus)  setifacies  group 

from  China 

1.  Cercus  nearly  straight.  Yunnan H.  (G.)  huangi  sp.  n. 

Cercus  rather  thick,  somewhat  swollen  and  rounded  apically 2 

2.  Fore  and  mid  femora  yellow.  Guizhou H.  (G.)  wuyangensis  Wei 

All  femora  black  with  dark  yellow  to  yellow  tips.  Shaanxi,  Sichuan,  Henan,  Guangdong 

H.  (G.)  zonalis  Yang,  Yang  and  Li 


Hercostomus  (Gymnopternus)  huangi  Zhang,  Yang  and  Masunaga, 

NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs  1-5) 

Diagnosis:  Postocular  bristles  black.  Antenna  black;  first  flagellomere  2.0 
times  longer  than  wide.  Cercus  nearly  straight  and  obtuse  apically. 

Description:  Male.  Body  length  2.7-2.8  mm,  wing  length  2.4-2.5  mm.  Head  metallic  green  with 
pale  gray  pollen.  Face  narrowing  downward,  narrower  than  first  flagellomere.  Hairs  and  bristles  on 
head  black;  postocular  bristles  (including  postero-ventral  hairs)  black.  Antenna  (Fig  2)  black;  first 
flagellomere  2.0  times  longer  than  wide,  somewhat  acute  apically;  arista  black,  minutely  pubescent, 
with  basal  segment  0.6  times  as  long  as  apical  segment.  Proboscis  dark  yellow  with  black  hairs;  pal- 
pus dark  yellow  with  black  hairs  and  1  black  apical  bristle.  Clypeus  with  one  pair  of  strong,  black 
bristles. 

Thorax  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  thorax  black;  6  strong  dc,  8 
paired  acr;  scutellum  with  2  pairs  of  bristles  (basal  pair  short  and  hair-like)  and  several  short  mar- 
ginal hairs.  Propleuron  with  1  black  bristle  on  lower  portion.  Legs  yellow;  fore  coxa  yellow,  mid  and 
hind  coxae  brownish  to  dark  brown;  hind  femur  with  black  tip;  hind  tibia  with  dark  brown  to  black 
tip;  fore  tarsus  from  tip  of  tarsomere  1  onward  brown,  mid  tarsus  from  tip  of  tarsomere  1  onward 
black,  hind  tarsus  black.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  legs  black;  mid  and  hind  coxae  with  1  outer  bristle. 
Mid  and  hind  femora  each  with  1  preapical  bristle.  Fore  tibia  with  1  ad  and  2  pd,  apically  with  2  short 
bristles;  mid  tibia  with  3  ad,  2  pd  and  1  av,  apically  with  3  bristles;  hind  tibia  with  3  ad,  4  pd  and  1 
av,  apically  with  4  bristles.  Relative  lengths  of  tibia  and  5  tarsomeres  LI  1.0  :  0.65  :  0.25  :  0.2  :  0.15 
:0.12;L1I  1.55  :  0.65  :  0.5  :  0.45  :  0.25  :  0.2;  LIII  1.9:0.5  :  0.65  :  0.5  :  0.35  :  0.2.  Wing  (Fig  1)  hya- 
line, tinged  with  grayish;  veins  brown,  R4+5  and  M  parallel  apically;  CuAx  ratio  (length  of  m- 
cu/length  of  CuA  distal  section)  0.3.  Squama  pale  yellow  with  black  hairs.  Halter  pale  yellow. 

Abdomen  dark  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  abdomen  black.  Male 
genitalia  (Fig  3-5):  Epandrium  distinctly  longer  than  wide,  with  long  finger-like  lateral  lobe  bearing 
3  long  apical  bristles;  cercus  nearly  straight  and  obtuse  apically;  hypandrium  acute  apically  in  ven- 
tral view. 

Female:  Unknown. 

Holotype:  Male,  Yunnan:  Xishuangbanna,  Jinghong  (300  m,  yellow  pan  trap),  2002.  IV.  12, 
Wenquan  Zhen,  deposited  in  the  insect  collection  of  China  Agricultural  University,  Beijing. 

Distribution:  China  (Yunnan). 

Etymology:  The  species  named  after  Prof.  Dawei  Huang  (Institute  of  Zoology,  Beijing). 

Remarks:  The  new  species  is  similar  to  H.  setifacies  Stackelberg,  but  may  be 
separated  from  the  latter  by  the  femora  being  yellow  except  the  tip  of  the  hind 
femur  is  black,  and  the  cercus  with  an  obtuse  apex.  In  setifacies,  the  femora  are 
black  except  the  tips  of  the  fore  and  mid  femora  are  yellow,  and  the  cercus  has 
an  acute  apex  (Stackelberg,  1934). 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 


37 


Hercostomus  (Gymnopternus)  huangi  sp.  nov. 

Figures  1-5.  Hercostomus  (Gymnopternus)  huangi  sp.  nov.  1.  wing;  2.  antenna,  lateral 
view;  3.  cercus,  lateral  view;  4.  male  genitalia  (excluding  cercus),  lateral  view;  5.  hypan- 
drium,  ventral  view. 


38  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  longicercm  group 

Diagnosis:  Antenna  black;  first  flagellomere  rather  small,  as  long  as  wide, 
arista  with  very  short  basal  segment  (0.2  times  as  long  as  apical  segment),  acr 
biseriate,  uniseriate  or  absent.  Cercus  slender  and  strap-like,  usually  longer  than 
epandrium. 

The  group  includes  the  following  8  species:  H.  (H.)  clavatus  Wei,  H.  (H.) 
ebaeus  Wei,  H.  (H.)  filiformis  Yang  and  Saigusa,  H.  (H.)  longicercus  Yang  and 
Yang,  H.  (H.)  modificatus  Yang  and  Saigusa,  H.  (H.)  pilifacies  Yang  and  Saigusa, 
H.  (H.)  pilicercus  Yang  and  Saigusa,  H.  (H.)  maoershanensis  sp.  nov.  The  geo- 
graphical distribution  of  these  species  is  shown  on  Figure  12. 

Key  to  the  species  of  the  Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  longicercus  group 

from  China 

1.  First  flagellomere  somewhat  acute  apically 2 

First  flagellomere  with  acute  upper  and  lower  apical  corners;  face  with  2-4  black  hairs  on  lower 
portion  (just  above  clypeus).  Yunnan H.  (H.)  pilifacies  Yang  and  Saigusa 

2.  Acr  absent 3 

Acr  present 4 

3.  Mid  coxa  blackish,  hind  coxa  yellow.  Yunnan H.  (H.)  longicercus  Yang  and  Yang 

Mid  and  hind  coxae  black.  Guangxi H.  (H.)  maoershanensis  sp.  n. 

4.  Acr  uniseriate 5 

Acr  biseriate 7 

5.  Femora  entirely  yellow 6 

Femora  black  with  yellow  tips.  Shaanxi,  Guizhou H.  (H.)  clavatus  Wei 

6.  Cercus  with  swollen  base.  Guizhou H.  (H.)  ebaeus  Wei 

Cercus  without  swollen  base.  Yunnan H.  (H.)  filiformis  Yang  and  Saigusa 

7.  Face  with  pale  hairs  on  lower  portion;  coxae  yellow.  Yunnan 

H.  (H.)  pilicercus  Yang  and  Saigusa 

Face  without  pale  hairs;  mid  and  hind  coxae  black.  Shaanxi 

H.  (H.)  modificatus  Yang  and  Saigusa 


Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  maoershanensis  Zhang,  Yang  and  Masunaga, 

NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs  6-10) 

Diagnosis:  Mid  and  lower  postocular  bristles  (including  postero-ventral  hairs) 
yellow.  Antenna  black;  first  flagellomere  1 .3  times  longer  than  wide,  acr  absent. 
Fore  coxa  brownish  black,  mid  and  hind  coxae  black.  CuAx  ratio  1.0. 

Description:  Male.  Body  length  2.8  mm,  wing  length  3.0  mm.  Head  metallic  green  with  pale  gray 
pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  head  black;  mid  and  lower  postocular  bristles  (including  postero-ventral 
hairs)  yellow.  Antenna  (Fig  7)  black;  first  flagellomere  1.3  times  longer  than  wide,  somewhat  obtuse 
apically;  arista  black,  nearly  bare,  with  basal  segment  0.23  times  as  long  as  apical  segment.  Proboscis 
black  with  black  hairs;  palpus  black  with  black  hairs  and  1  black  apical  bristle. 

Thorax  dark  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  thorax  black;  6  strong  dc, 
acr  absent;  scutellum  with  2  pairs  of  bristles  (lateral  pair  short  and  hair-like)  and  several  short  mar- 
ginal hairs.  Propleuron  with  1  black  bristle  on  lower  portion.  Legs  yellow;  fore  coxa  brownish  black. 


Vol.  1 1 5,  No.  1 ,  January  &  February  2004  39 


mid  and  hind  coxae  black;  fore  femur  blackish,  mid  and  hind  femora  yellow  with  extremely  black 
tip;  tibia  yellow  with  extremely  black  base  and  tips;  fore  tarsus  dark  brown  to  black,  mid  tarsus  from 
tip  of  tarsomere  1  onward  black,  hind  tarsus  entirely  black.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  legs  black;  mid  and 
hind  coxae  with  1  outer  bristle.  Mid  and  hind  femora  each  with  1  preapical  bristle.  Fore  tibia  with  2 
pd,  apically  with  2  short  bristles  and  1  black  thin  apv  (about  0.4  times  as  long  as  fore  tarsomere  1 )  ; 
mid  tibia  with  3  ad,  2  pd  and  1  av,  apically  with  4  bristles;  hind  tibia  with  3  ad,  3  pd  and  1  av,  api- 
cally with  3  bristles.  Hind  tarsomere  1  with  1  v  at  base.  Relative  lengths  of  tibia  and  5  tarsomeres  LI 
1.0  :  0.6  :  0.25  :  0.2  :  0.15  :  0.15;  LII  1.55  :  0.85  :  0.5  :  0.4  :  0.5  :  0.2;  LIII  2.0:  0.53  :  0.7  :  0.5  :  0.3 
:  0.25.  Wing  (Fig  6)  hyaline,  tinged  with  grayish;  veins  black,  R4+5  and  M  parallel  apically;  CuAx 
ratio  1.0.  Squama  pale  yellow  with  black  hairs.  Halter  yellow. 

Abdomen  dark  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  abdomen  black.  Male 
genitalia  (Fig  8-10):  Epandrium  distinctly  longer  than  wide,  narrowing  toward  apex,  with  slightly 
curved  lateral  lobe  bearing  2  long  bristles  and  1  short  apical  bristle;  cercus  slightly  shorter  than  epan- 
drium,  and  with  long  ventral  bristles  and  hairs;  hypandrium  acute  apically  in  ventral  view. 
Female.  Body  length  2.8-3.2  mm,  wing  length  3.0-3.2  mm.  Similar  to  male. 

Holotype:  Male,  Guangxi:  Maoershan  National  Nature  Reserve  (2100m,  light  trap),  2003.  VII.  5. 
Shuwen  An,  deposited  in  the  insect  collection  of  China  Agricultural  University,  Beijing.  Paratypes: 
1  Cf,  Guangxi:  Maoershan  National  Nature  Reserve  (2100m,  light  trap),  2003.  VII.  5,  Shuwen  An, 
deposited  in  the  insect  collection  of  China  Agricultural  University,  Beijing;  3  Cf  4  9-  Guangxi: 
Maoershan  National  Nature  Reserve,  Sanjiangyuan  (1900  m  ,  light  trap),  2003  VI  30,  Xingyue  Liu, 
deposited  in  the  insect  collection  of  China  Agricultural  University,  Beijing. 

Distribution:  China  (Guangxi). 

Etymology:  The  specific  name  refers  to  the  type  locality,  Maoershan. 

Remarks.  The  new  species  is  similar  to  H.  longicercus  Yang  and  Yang  by  hav- 
ing no  acr,  but  may  be  separated  from  the  latter  by  the  black  mid  and  hind  coxae. 
In  H.  longicercus,  the  mid  coxa  is  blackish,  and  the  hind  coxa  is  yellow  (Yang 
and  Yang,  1995). 


GENERAL  DISCUSSION 

For  the  species  of  Hercostomus  (Gymnopternus)  setifacies-group,  H.  (G.) 
huangi  is  distributed  in  South  China  Region  (Southern  Yunnan  Subregion: 
Yunnan,  Xishuangbanna),  H.  (G.)  wuyangensis  Wei  is  scattered  in  Central  China 
Region  (Western  mountain  Subregion:  Guizhou,  Zhenyuan),  H.  (G.)  zonalis  is 
widely  distributed  in  both  Palaearctic  part  and  Oriental  part  of  China  that  includ- 
ing North  China  Region  (Huang-hai  Plains  Subregion:  Henan:  Songxian,  Luan- 
chuan  and  Xixia),  Central  China  Region  (East  hilly  plain  Subregion:  Henan, 
Luoshan;  Western  mountain  Subregion:  Sichuan,  Emeishan),  South  China 
Region  (Min-Guang  Subregion:  Guangdong:  Nanling  and  Shimentai). 

The  eight  species  of  Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  longicercus-group  both  are 
distributed  in  the  Oriental  part  of  China.  H.  (H.)  longicercus  Yang  and  Yang  is 
distributed  in  Central  China  Region  (East  hilly  plain  Subregion:  Zhejiang, 
Baishanzu);  H.  (H.)  clavatus  Wei,  H.  (H.)  ebaeus  Wei,  H.  (H.)  modificatus  Yang 
and  Saigusa  and  H.  (H.)  maoershanensis  sp.  nov.  are  distributed  in  Central  China 
Region  (Western  mountain  Subregion:  Guizhou,  Fanjingshan;  Shaanxi,  Zuoshui; 
Guangxi,  Maoershan);  H.  (H.)  Jllifonnis  Yang  and  Saigusa,  H.  (H.)  pilicercus 
Yang  and  Saigusa  and  H.  (H.)  pilifacies  Yang  and  Saigusa  are  scattered  in  South 
China  Region  (Southern  Yunnan  Subregion:  Yunnan). 


40 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  are  very  grateful  to  Ms.  Shuwen  An,  Ms.  Chunfeng  Jia,  Mr.  Xingyue  Liu  (China  Agricultural 
University,  Beijing)  and  Mr.  Wenquan  Zhen  (Institute  of  Zoology,  Beijing)  for  collecting  the  speci- 
mens, and  to  Professor  Dawei  Huang  (Institute  of  Zoology,  Beijing)  for  providing  the  specimens. 
This  research  was  supported  by  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (No.  30225009). 


10 


8 


Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  maoershanensis  sp.  nov. 

Figures  6-10.  Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  maoershanensis  sp.  nov.  6.  wing;  7.  antenna, 
lateral  view;  8.  male  genitalia,  lateral  view;  9.  genital  apical  processes,  lateral  view; 
10.  hypandrium,  ventral  view. 


Vol.  115,  No.  1,  January  &  February  2004 


41 


CO 

u 

c 
c. 

3 
O 

ab 


I 

I 

I 


a 

a 
§ 


•si 

5 


K 

3 


42 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Vol.  115,  No.  1,  January  &  February  2004  43 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Dyte,  D.  E.  1975.  Family  Dolichopodidae.  pp.  212-258.  In,  Delfinado,  M.  D.  and  D.  E.  Hardy 
(Editors).  A  catalog  of  the  Diptera  of  the  Oriental  region.  Volume  2.  The  University  Press  of 
Hawaii,  Honolulu.  459  pp. 

Negrobov,  O.  P.  1991.  Family  Dolichopodidae.  pp.  11-139.  In,  Soos,  A.  and  L.  Papp  (Editors). 
Catalog  of  Palaearctic  Diptera.  Volume  7.  Akademiai  Kiado,  Budapest.  291  pp. 

Stackelberg,  A.  A.  1929.  Dolichopodidae.  In:  Lindner,  E.  (Editor).  Die  Fliegen  der  Palaearktischen 
Region,  1933-1934,  4(5):  Lief.  71:  65-128;  Lief  82:  129-176. 

Wei,  L.  1997.  Dolichopodiae  (Diptera)  from  Southwest  China  II.  A  study  of  the  genus  Hercostomus 
Loew,  1857.  Journal  of  Guizhou  Agricultural  College  16  (1):  29-41;  16  (4):  32-43. 

Yang,  D.  1997.  Five  new  species  of  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from  Longwang  Mountain,  Zhejiang, 
Southeastern  China.  Deutsche  Entomologische  Zeitschrift  44(2):  147-153. 

Yang,  D.  and  P.  Grootaert.  1999.  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera:  Empidoidea)  from  Xishuangbanna 
(China, Yunnan  province):  the  Dolichopodinae  and  the  genus  Chaandogonopteron  (I).  -  Bulletin 
de  Tlnstitut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie  69:  251-277. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  1999.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  from  China  (VI): 
Diptera  from  Emei  Mountain  ( 1 ).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique 
Entomologie  69:  233-250. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2000.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  from  China  (VII): 
Diptera  from  Emei  Mountain  (2).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique 
Entomologie  70:  219-242. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2001a.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from 
China  (VIII).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique  Entomologie  71: 
155-164. 

Y'ang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2001b.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from 
China  (IX).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique  Entomologie  71: 
165-188. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  200 Ic.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from 
China  (X).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique  Entomologie  71:1 89- 
236. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2001d.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from 
China  (XI).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique  Entomologie  71: 

237-256. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2002.  The  species  of  Hercostomus  from  the  Oinling  Mountains  of 
Shaanxi,  China.  (Diptera,  Empidoidea,  Dolichopodidae).  Deutsche  Entomologische  Zeitschrift 
49(1):  61-88. 

Yang,  D.  and  C.  K.  Yang.  1995.  Diptera:  Dolichopodidae.  pp.  510-519.  In,  Wu  H.  (Editor).  Insects 
of  Baishanzu  Mountain,  Eastern  China.  China  Forestry  Publishing  House.  Beijing.  586  pp. 

Zhang,  L.  L.  and  D.  Yang.  2003.  Notes  on  the  genus  Hercostomus  Loew,  1857  from  Guangxi, 
China  (Diptera:  Empidoidea:  Dolichopodidae).  Annales  Zoologici  53(4):  657-661. 


44  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


THE  FEMALE  OF  TENUIPHANTES  CRACENS 

(ARANEAE:  LINYPHIIDAE) 
FROM  NEWFOUNDLAND,  CANADA1 

J.  R.  Pickavance2 

ABSTRACT:  The  female  of  Tenuiphantes  cracens  is  described  for  the  first  time  from  specimens 
caught  at  Port  au  Choix,  Newfoundland,  Canada,  in  pitfall  traps  in  spruce-fir  woods  at  nearly  sea 
level.  The  climatic  severity  of  the  location  creates  a  suitable  environment  for  this  alpine  species.  To 
date,  the  species  has  only  been  caught  during  a  brief  summer  period. 

KEY  WORDS:  Tenuiphantes  cracens,  female,  Araneae,  Linyphiidae,  Newfoundland,  Canada. 

Zorsch  (1937)  described  the  new  species  Lepthyphantes  cracens  (now 
Tenuiphantes;  Saaristo  and  Tanasevitch,  1996)  on  the  basis  of  two  males:  the 
holotype  collected  by  C.  R.  Crosby  in  1921  from  Mount  Whiteface,  New  York, 
and  another  male  specimen  from  Mount  Marcy,  New  York,  collected  by  C.  R. 
Crosby  in  1930.  The  female  was  not  described.  As  recently  as  2001  no  other  lo- 
cation had  been  reported  (Buckle  et  al.,  2001 ).  Then  Paquin  et  al.  (2001a,  b)  first 
mentioned  the  occurrence  of  males  of  the  species  in  Canada  in  Quebec.  Subse- 
quently the  species  was  included  in  a  guide  to  Quebec  spiders  (Paquin  and 
Duperre,  2003).  In  2000  pitfall  trap  collections  in  Newfoundland  produced  both 
males  and  the  previously  unknown  female  of  T.  cracens.  The  female  is  described 
here  for  the  first  time.  Good  reasons  should  always  be  provided  for  matching  an 
unknown  sex  with  its  counterpart.  Here,  the  unknown  females  are  matched  to 
male  T.  cracens  for  two  reasons.  First,  because  the  females  were  taken  in  the 
same  set  of  traps  at  the  same  time  as  males  of  the  species,  and  second  because 
the  other  Tenuiphantes  species  known  from  Newfoundland,  T.  nigriventris 
(L.  Koch  1879),  T.  tennis  (Blackwall  1852)  and  T.  zebra  (Emerton  1882),  have 
the  identity  of  both  sexes  well  established. 


METHODS 

All  specimens  of  T.  cracens  reported  here  were  caught  in  pitfall  traps  set  in  the 
litter  of  a  stand  of  stunted,  spruce-fir  (Picea  spp.,  Abies  balsamea)  woods  (50° 
42'  N,  57°  20.9'  W;  about  8.9  m  above  sea  level)  on  the  eastern  edge  of  the  com- 
munity of  Port  au  Choix,  Newfoundland.  Twenty  traps  were  installed  in  four 
groups  of  five,  each  group  arranged  in  a  one  square  metre  quincunx.  All  traps 
were  in  place  from  June  24  to  August  20,  2000.  Trapped  specimens  were  re- 
moved on  July  8,  July  24,  August  2,  August  11,  and  August  20.  One  quincunx  for 
one  trapping  period  is  here  referred  to  as  a  set.  Contents  of  the  five  traps  form- 


'  Received  on  May  29,  2004.  Accepted  on  June  8,  2004. 

1  Biology  Department  Memorial  University  of  Newfoundland,  St.  John's,  Newfoundland,  Canada, 
A1B3X9.  E-mail:  rpickava^mun.ca. 

Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February  2004 45_ 

ing  one  set  were  lumped  as  one  sample.  A  total  of  5  female  and  1 7  male  T.  cra- 
cens  were  caught  as  follows:  August  2-11,  4Cf  and  39  in  the  same  set;  August 
11-20,  2cf  and  29  in  the  same  set;  August  11-20,  llcf  in  a  separate  set  with  no 
females.  Note  that  all  females  were  taken  in  the  same  sets  as  6  of  the  males.  The 
remaining  1 1  males  were  caught  in  a  separate  set  of  traps  from  the  same  time 
period  as  one  of  the  catches  containing  both  males  and  females.  An  example  of 
the  males  has  been  identified  as  T.  cracens  by  Dr.  C.  D.  Dondale  of  the  Canadian 
National  Collection  of  Insects  and  Arachnids,  Ottawa  (CNC).  A  male  and  a 
female  have  been  deposited  in  the  CNC.  The  remaining  specimens  (both  male 
and  female)  are  in  the  Biology  Department  (Pickavance  collection).  Memorial 
University  of  Newfoundland. 

RESULTS 

Diagnosis 

The  external  genitalia  of  female  T.  cracens  resemble  in  general  form  the  other 
Tenuiphantes  species  known  from  northeastern  North  America.  These  species  are 
distinguished  as  follows.  The  sides  of  the  scape  of  T.  nigriventris  are  approxi- 
mately straight  (Helsdingen  et  al.,  1977)  whereas  the  sides  of  the  scape  of  T.  cra- 
cens have  a  distinct  concavity  in  the  posterior  half.  The  anterior  portion  of  the 
scape  of  T.  tenuis  has  distinctly  concave  sides  (Helsdingen  et  al.,  1977),  where- 
as the  anterior  part  of  the  scape  of  T.  cracens  has  convex  sides.  The  scape  of  T. 
zebra  is  not  expanded  posteriorly  and  is  broadly  rectangular  or  ovoid  (Paquin 
and  Duperre,  2003),  whereas  the  scape  of  T.  cracens  is  expanded  posteriorly  into 
two  lateral  wings. 

Description 

Figures  1-3  illustrate  the  external  female  genitalia  of  T.  cracens.  The  term  "scape"  is  used  here  in 
the  sense  of  Zorsch  (1937)  to  mean  a  continuation  of  the  middle  part  of  the  ventral  wall  of  the  epig- 
ynum  which  is  folded  under  itself  and  out  again  so  that  the  narrow  tip  appears  as  a  rounded  tubercle 
at  the  end  of  the  widened  visible  part  of  the  organ.  Observations  and  measurements  are  based  on  five 
specimens.  The  external  appearance  is  characteristic.  Mean  width  of  the  epigynum  at  widest  point  is 
272  urn  (range  265  -  275  um).  The  bell-shaped  scape  ends  in  a  posteriorly  projecting  central  process 
which  lies  dorsal  to  the  principal  part  of  the  scape.  Width  of  the  scape  at  its  widest  point  is  198  um 
(no  measurable  variation  in  the  specimens  examined).  Mean  length  of  the  scape  (from  narrowest  part 
of  neck  to  posterior  edge;  excluding  posteriorly  projecting  process)  is  266  um  (range  264  -  275  um). 
The  ventral  surface  of  the  principal  part  of  the  scape  has  a  shallow  central  depression  surrounded  by 
a  sclerotised  area  which  presents  a  slightly  different  appearance  in  each  of  the  specimens  examined. 
The  anterior  neck  of  the  scape  joins  the  anterior  and  lateral  margins  of  the  epigynum  through  an  acute 
angle.  In  three  of  the  specimens  this  acute  angle  is  rounded  and  the  neck  of  the  scape  is  not  hidden 
under  the  anterior  margin  or  seemingly  shielded  by  a  membrane.  In  the  other  two  specimens  the  acute 
angle  is  sharp  rather  than  rounded  so  that  the  anterior  of  the  neck  is  slightly  tucked  under  the  anteri- 
or margin  of  the  epigynum.  The  anterior  and  lateral  margins  of  the  epigynum  are  smoothly  concave 
rather  than  sinuous.  Although  all  the  epigyna  examined  here  display  a  general  bilateral  symmetry,  all 
were  slightly  asymmetrical  in  detail.  Typically  this  asymmetry  was  particularly  evident  in  the  mar- 
gins of  the  epigynum,  the  shape  of  the  scape,  and  the  configuration  of  the  central  depression  on  the 
scape. 


46 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


0        100     200 


Figures  1  -  3.   Tenuiphantes    cracens  female  epigynum.  1.  Ventral,  2.  Postero-ventral, 
3.  Left  lateral.  All  figures  drawn  to  the  same  scale.  Setae  and  bristles  omitted  for  clarity. 


Vol.  1 15,  No.  1,  January  &  February  2004 47_ 

DISCUSSION 

Adults  of  the  species  are  evidently  only  sufficiently  active  to  be  caught  in  pit- 
fall traps  for  a  limited  period  of  time  because  all  17  specimens  of  this  study  were 
caught  in  only  two  of  the  trapping  periods,  covering  the  period  August  2  to  Aug- 
ust 20,  2000.  All  other  T.  cracens  specimens  reported  to  date  have  been  caught 
between  July  7  and  August  27.  Paquin  et  al.  (2001b)  reported  two  specimens 
caught  in  1991  from  the  Gaspe:  one  on  July  8,  the  other  between  August  12  and 
19.  Zorsch  (1937)  reported  two  specimens  from  New  York:  one  taken  on  August 
25,  1921,  the  other  on  August  27,  1930.  Clearly,  future  searches  for  this  rarely 
collected  species  should  focus  on  this  time  period. 

The  Port  au  Choix  locality  of  T.  cracens,  at  about  9  m  above  sea  level,  seems 
quite  different  from  the  other  alpine- Appalachian  (Paquin  et  al.  200 Ib)  localities 
reported  for  this  species:  Mount  Whiteface,  Mount  Marcy  and  the  Gaspe.  How- 
ever, what  Port  au  Choix  lacks  in  altitude  it  makes  up  for  in  climatic  severity. 
Port  au  Choix  is  at  the  northern  end  of  the  Northern  Peninsula  Ecoregion  with  its 
Atlantic  high  boreal  ecoclimate  and  in  many  ways  is  similar  to  the  Strait  of  Belle 
Isle  Ecoregion  immediately  to  the  north  with  its  Atlantic  low  subarctic  ecocli- 
mate (Ecological  Stratification  Working  Group,  1995).  Under  either  climatic 
regime,  if  T.  cracens  is  indeed  an  alpine  species  then  Port  au  Choix  would  pro- 
vide its  climatic  ecological  requirements. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  am  grateful  to  Dr.  C.  D.  Dondale  for  both  identifying  the  male  of  L.  cracens  and  his  general  sup- 
port of  my  arachnological  endeavours.  I  wish  to  thank  Drs.  M.  Colbo  and  D.  Innes  for  critical 
appraisal  of  this  manuscript,  the  Biology  Department,  Memorial  University  for  facilities  and  support, 
and  two  anonymous  reviewers  whose  thoughtful  suggestions  greatly  improved  this  paper. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Buckle,  D.  J.,  D.  Carroll,  R.  L.  Crawford,  and  V.  D.  Roth.  2001.  Linyphiidae  and  Pimoidae  of 
America  north  of  Mexico:  Checklist,  synonymy,  and  literature.  In,  Paquin,  P.  and  D.  J.  Buckle 
(Editeurs).  Contributions  a  la  connaissance  des  Araignees  (Araneae)  d'Amerique  du  Nord. 
Fabreries  Supplement  10.  Part  2:  89-191. 

Ecological  Stratification  Working  Group.  1995.  A  National  Ecological  Framework  for  Canada. 
Resources  Research  and  Environment  Canada,  State  of  the  Environment  Directorate,  Ecozone 
Analysis  Branch,  Ottawa/Hull.  Report  and  national  map  at  1:7,500,000  scale. 

Helsdingen,  P.  J.  Van,  K.  Thaler,  and  C.  Deltschev.  1977.  The  tenuis  group  of  Lepthvphantes 
Menge  (Araneae,  Linyphiidae).  Tijdschrift  Voor  Entomologie  120:  1-54. 

Paquin,  P.  and  N.  Duperre.  2003.  Guide  d'identification  des  Araignees  (Araneae)  du  Quebec. 
Fabreries  Supplement  1 1 :  3-25 1 . 


48 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Paquin,  P.,  N.  Duperre,  and  R.  Hutchinson.  2001a.  Liste  revisee  des  Araignees  (Araneae)  du 
Quebec.  Partie  1.  Pages  5-87.  In,  Paquin,  P.  and  D.  J.  Buckle  (Editeurs).  Contributions  a  la  con- 
naissance  des  Araignees  (Arachnida)  d'  Amerique  du  Nord.  Fabreries,  Supplement  10.  Part  1.  7- 

87. 

Paquin,  P.,  L.  LeSage,  et  N.  Duperre.  200  Ib.  First  Canadian  Records  of  Tenuiphantes  cracens 
(Zorsch)  and  Walckenaeria  clavipalpis  Millidge  (Araneae:  Linyphiidae),  plus  thirteen  new  pro- 
vincial records  and  a  confirmation  for  Quebec.  Entomological  News  1 12(4):27 1-277. 

Saaristo,  M.  I.,  and  A.  V.  Tanasevitch.  1996.  Redelimitation  of  the  subfamily  Micronetinae  Hull, 
1920  and  the  genus  Lepthvphantes  Menge,  1866  with  descriptions  of  some  new  genera.  Bericht 
des  naturforschenden  lich  Medzinischen  Vereines  in  Innsbruck  83:163  -186. 

Zorsch,  H.  M.  1937.  The  spider  genus  Lepthvphantes  in  the  United  States.  American  Midland 
Naturalist  18:856-898. 


CORRIGENDUM 

On  a  recent  paper  by  Yang  et  al.  (2003,  mailed  on  September  30,  2004), 
Notes  on  Dolichopus,  Allohercostornus,  and  Phalacrosoma  from  Nepal 
(Diptera:  Dolichopodidae.  Entomological  News  114(5):27 1-274,  figures  1- 
3  were  misprinted.  The  correct  images  follow. 


Figs  1-3.  Dolichopus  nepalensis  n.  sp.  (male).  1,  Antenna  (excluding  scape), 
lateral  view;  2.  genitalia,  lateral  view;  3,  apical  genital  process,  lateral  view. 
Scale  =  0.25  mm. 


Vol.  115.  No.  I.  January'  &  February  2004 49_ 

A  LONG-LASTING  METHOD  FOR  MARKING  BEETLES 

(COLEOPTERA),  WHICH  DOES  NOT 

ENHANCE  MORTALITY1 

A.  J.  Bates2  and  J.  P.  Sadler 

ABSTRACT:  Mark-release-recapture  studies  require  marking  methods  that  are  durable  and  do  not 
enhance  the  rate  of  mortality.  Paint  from  the  Mark-Tex  Tech-Pen"  was  used  to  mark  two  species  of 
carabid  (Bemhidion  atrocaendeum  and  B.  decorum),  and  an  enhanced  rate  of  mortality,  due  to  paint 
toxicity,  was  tested  for.  No  significant  increase  in  the  mortality  was  detected  over  a  37-day  period 
when  compared  to  unmarked  beetles.  It  was  concluded  that  the  marking  method  did  not  enhance  mor- 
tality over  the  period  of  study. 

KEY  WORDS:  Bembidion  atrocaeruleum,  Bembidion  decorum,  Coleoptera,  Carabidae,  exposed 
riverine  sediments  (ERS),  mark-release-recapture,  mark-toxicity. 

Mark-release-recapture  (MRR)  studies,  whether  for  estimating  population  size 
or  for  studying  movement  dynamics,  require  methods  of  marking  insects  that 
allow  the  identification  of  recaptured  individuals.  The  ideal  marking  method 
should  satisfy  a  number  of  criteria  (Southwood  and  Henderson  2000),  which 
include:  ( 1 )  the  marks  must  be  durable  enough  to  last  the  duration  of  study,  and 
(2)  the  marking  method  should  not  affect  longevity.  Wineriter  and  Walker  (1984) 
tested  the  durability  of  26  marking  materials  on  the  pronota  of  three  species  of 
insect,  including  the  red  flour  beetle,  Tribolium  castaneum  (Herbst).  They  found 
that  ink  extracted  from  the  Mark-Tex  Tech-Pen*  was  the  only  material  suffi- 
ciently durable  when  applied  to  the  flour  beetle.  Paint  from  the  most  modern  ver- 
sion of  this  marker,  the  TexPen"  (ITW  Dymon,  805  E,  Old  56  Hwy.,  Olathe,  KS 
66061),  was  used  in  the  study  of  Bates  et  al.  (in  press).  Despite  the  abrasive 
nature  of  the  exposed  riverine  sediment  (ERS,  open  gravel  and  sand  by  the  edge 
of  rivers)  habitat  in  which  the  MRR  investigation  was  implemented,  the  durabil- 
ity of  marks  was  shown  to  be  sufficient  for  the  period  of  study  (Bates  et  al.  in 
press).  To  test  the  second  criterion,  that  the  marking  method  does  not  affect 
longevity,  is  the  subject  of  this  paper. 

METHODS 

The  species  from  the  MRR  investigation  chosen  for  the  toxicity  study  were 
two  species  of  carabid,  Bembidion  atrocaeruleum  (Stephens)  and  Bembidion 
decorum  (Zenker  in  Panzer).  These  are  both  relatively  small,  (4.5-5.5  and  5.6-6 
mm,  respectively),  fast-running,  nearly  glabrous  species,  chosen  for  the  study 
due  to  their  abundance  and  close  association  with  ERS. 

Paint  was  removed  from  the  pens  and  diluted  at  5:1  (paint  :  thinner)  with  tur- 
pentine substitute.  Beetles  were  controlled  by  dropping  them  into  water,  from 
where  they  could  be  picked  from  the  surface  and  held  immobile  by  firmly  hold- 


1  Received  on  September  16,  2004.  Accepted  October  14,  2004. 

-  School  of  Geography,  Earth  &  Environmental  Sciences,  The  University  of  Birmingham,  Edgbaston, 
Birmingham,  B15  2TT,  England,  United  Kingdom.  AJB  is  author  for  correspondence.  E-mail  (AJS): 
ajbl95@bham.ac.uk.  E-mail  (JPS):  j. p. sadlerw  bham.ac.uk. 

Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


50  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ing  their  hind  legs  between  thumb  and  forefinger.  One  dot  of  each  of  six  colors 
of  paint  (red,  yellow,  orange,  blue,  green  and  white)  were  applied,  three  dots  to 
each  elytra,  using  a  piece  of  5-amp  fuse  wire. 

Beetles  were  kept  outdoors,  in  round  white  polypropylene  paint  kettles  (inter- 
nal diameter  =  172  mm,  height  150  mm),  which  had  holes  in  the  bottom  to  allow 
drainage  and  20-25  mm  of  sand  and  gravel  substrate  in  which  the  beetles  could 
hide  and  forage.  White  nylon  netting  (-0.5  mm  diameter)  was  secured  across  the 
top  of  the  container  with  glue  continuously  along  ~40  percent  of  the  container's 
circumference  and  elastic  bands  for  the  remainder.  This  allowed  easy  access  into 
the  containers  for  feeding  and  counting  purposes.  The  sediment,  which  was 
removed  from  the  MRR  site,  was  initially  heated  overnight  at  140°C  in  order  to 
kill  beetle  parasites.  The  beetles  were  fed  with  freeze-dried  chironomids  as 
required.  The  survival  of  marked  beetles  of  both  species  was  compared  with  the 
survival  of  unmarked  beetles  over  a  36-day  period  in  five  replicate  containers. 
Ten  beetles  were  kept  in  each  container  and  beetles  were  counted  at  two-  to  four- 
day  intervals.  Mann- Whitney  U  (Wilcoxon-Mann- Whitney)  tests  were  used  to 
determine  if  the  number  of  marked  and  unmarked  beetles  surviving  at  each  time 
period  was  significantly  different. 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

Figure  1  illustrates  the  results  of  the  mark  toxicity  experiment.  At  almost 
every  time  period,  for  B.  atrocaeruleum  and  B.  decorum,  the  mean  number  of 
marked  and  unmarked  beetles  surviving  were  within  1  standard  error  of  each 
other  and  none  of  the  differences  were  significant  at  even  the  10  percent  level.  It 
is  concluded  therefore  that  the  handling  and  marking  process  used  did  not 
increase  mortality  in  B.  atrocaeruleum  and  B.  decorum  over  the  period  of  study. 
The  toxicity  experiment  was  run  over  a  longer  time  window  than  those  used  for 
the  MRR  study  of  Bates  et  al.  (in  press),  which  were  <22  days.  We  therefore 
conclude  that  the  marking  method  was  likely  to  have  caused  no  extra  mortality 
in  this  investigation.  It  seems  highly  unlikely  that  a  toxic  effect  would  occur  after 
this  36-day  period  after  marking.  The  marking  method  described  is  a  quick,  inex- 
pensive method  of  marking  small  beetles  and  other  insects,  which,  for  the  species 
tested  is  sufficiently  durable  and  nontoxic.  Given  the  findings  of  Wineriter  and 
Walker  (1984)  it  seems  likely  that  the  mark  longevity  on  other  insects  will  be 
longer  than  for  B.  atrocaeruleum  and  B.  decorum  when  the  species  are  pubes- 
cent, or  when  they  live  in  less  abrasive  habitats. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  Richard  Johnson  for  all  his  help  and  advice.  We  also  thank  the  department  of  Geography, 
Earth  and  Environmental  Sciences  at  the  University  of  Birmingham,  UK,  and  the  Countryside  Coun- 
cil of  Wales  for  funding  this  research. 


Vol.  1 15.  No.  1,  January  &  February  2004 


51 


•- 

~ 
A 

B 

s 

B 

B 
« 
0> 


7.5 


10.0  -, 


9-5- 


9.0  - 


8.5  - 


80  - 


9.5  - 
9.0  - 
8.5  - 

*  —  ft  —  *  —  i 
N> 

^ 

^ 

^s 

~i 

t 

k       • 

N 

i           M 

k     i 

k            J 

b^ 

J 

k                J 

L          J 

ft              J 
*---. 

L            J 

i.    J 

k                J 

i          j 

80  - 
75  . 

-^ 

Marked 
Unmarked 

f * 


rms 


Marked 
Unmarked 


10 


15 


20 


25 


30 


35 


40 


Days  since  marking 


Figure  1.     A  comparison  of  the  mean  number  of  marked  and  unmarked  Bembidion  deco- 
rum (top,  triangles)  and  Bembidion  atrocaeruleum  (bottom,  squares)  surviving  in  replicate 


<- 


(n  =  5)  gravel  microcosms  (error  bars  show  -  1  1SE). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bates,  A.  J.,  J.  P.  Sadler,  A.  P.  Fowles,  and  C.  R.  Butcher.  Spatial  dynamics  of  beetles  living  on 
exposed  riverine  sediments  in  the  upper  River  Severn:  method  development  and  preliminary 
results.  Aquatic  Consen>ation:  Marine  and  Freshwater  Ecosystems  14  (in  press). 

Southwood,  T.  R.  E.  and  P.  A.  Henderson.  2000.  Ecological  methods  (3rd  Edition)  Blackwell 
Science,  Oxford,  England,  United  Kingdom.  656  pp. 

Wineriter,  S.  A.  and  T.  J.  Walker.  1984.  Insect  marking  techniques:  Durability  of  materials. 
Entomological  News  95:  117-123. 


52  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

ATTENDANCE  OF  AETALION RETICULATUM 

(HEMIPTERA:  AETALIONIDAE) 

BY  POLISTES  ERYTHROCEPHALUS 

(HYMENOPTERA:  VESPIDAE)  IN  PERU1 

M.  A.  MacCarroll2  and  W.  K.  Reeves3 

Homopteran  honeydew  is  a  carbohydrate  food  source  for  Hymenoptera  and 
Diptera  in  the  Neotropics  (Letourneau  and  Choe  1987,  Cameron  et  al  1995). 
Honeydew  contains  a  mixture  of  oligosacharides  including  melezitose  and 
stachylose  (Russell  and  Hunter,  2002)  and  might  be  a  higher  energy  food  source 
than  floral  nectar.  The  quality  of  food  is  important  in  determining  caste  in  social 
Hymenoptera  (O'Donnell  1998).  In  certain  Diptera,  such  as  sand  flies  (Psycho- 
didae:  Phlebotominae),  the  composition  of  the  sugar  might  affect  the  develop- 
ment of  medically  important  trypanosomatids  (Leishmania)  in  the  gut  (Cameron 
etal.  1995). 

Polistes  eiythrocephalus  Latreille  (Hymenoptera:  Vespidae)  was  not  known  to 
tend  or  collect  honeydew  from  aetalionids.  On  March  23,  2004,  at  1243h,  we 
observed  four  aggregations  of  Aetalion  reticulatum  (L.)  (Hemiptera:  Aetalioni- 
dae)  feeding  on  a  tree,  most  likely  Solanaceae,  in  Agua  Caliente,  Department  of 
Cusco,  Peru.  Each  aggregation  consisted  of  approximately  30-40  individuals, 
including  nymphs,  and  adult  males  and  females.  A  single  female  P.  eiythro- 
cephalus was  standing  among  or  below  each  of  the  aggregations  of  A.  reticula- 
tum. Polistes  eiythrocephalus  touched  individuals  of  A.  reticulatum  with  their 
antennae  but  the  homopterans  did  not  directly  feed  the  wasps  honeydew.  Honey- 
dew  accumulated  below  the  aggregations  of  A.  reticulatum,  and  P.  eiythro- 
cephalus gleaned  the  honeydew  from  the  branch  directly  below  the  homopteran 
aggregation  (Figure  1 ).  We  collected  and  tasted  the  honeydew  from  the  branch  to 
verify  that  it  was  honeydew  and  not  rain  water.  When  P.  eiythrocephalus  was 
collected,  it  regurgitated  a  drop  of  honeydew  from  its  mouth.  This  is  the  first 
account  of  P.  eiythrocephalus  tending  A  reticulatum  and  is  further  evidence  that 
this  homopteran  is  tended  by  wasps  throughout  its  range.  Aetalion  reticulatum 
ranges  from  Mexico  to  Brazil  and  is  tended  by  vespids  in  Costa  Rica  (Letourneau 
and  Choe  1987).  Voucher  specimens  of  P.  eiythrocephalus  and  A  reticulatum  are 
deposited  in  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History  (Division  of  Invertebrate 
Zoology)  and  in  the  Clemson  University  Arthropod  Collection. 


1  Submitted  on  May  24,  2004.  Accepted  on  June  16,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Entomology,  Soil,  and  Plant  Sciences,  Clemson  University,  Clemson,  SC  29634, 
U.S.A.  E-mail:  mmaccar(a),clemson.edu. 

1  Viral  and  Rickettsial  Zoonoses  Branch,  Centers   for  Disease  Control  and  Prevention.  1600  Clifton 
Road,  Atlanta,  Georgia  30333  U.S.A.  E-mail:  cui8@cdc.gov.  Corresponding  Author. 

Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


Vol.  115.  No.  1.  January  &  February-  2004 


Figure  1 .  Polistes  erythrocephalus  feeding  on  honeydew  below  an  aggregation  ofAetalion 
reticulatum  in  Agua  Caliente,  Department  of  Cusco,  Peru,  March  23,  2004. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  C.R.  Bartlett,  J.M.  Carpenter,  and  P.O.  McMillan  for  identifying  specimens,  and  PH. 
Adler  and  M.W.  Turnbull  for  reviewing  this  manuscript.  This  research  was  partially  supported  by  the 
College  of  Agriculture,  Forestry,  and  Life  Sciences  Travel  Grant  from  Clemson  University.  This  is 
technical  contribution  4991  of  the  Clemson  University  Experiment  Station. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Cameron,  M.  M.,  P.  J.  M.  Milligan,  A.  I.lano-Cuentas,  and  C.  R.  Davics.  1995.  An  association 
between  phlebotomine  sandtlies  and  aphids  in  the  Peruvian  Andes.  Medical  and  Veterinary 
[Entomology  9:  127-132. 

Lctourneau,  D.  and  J.  C.  Choc.  1987.  Homopteran  attendance  by  wasps  and  ants:  the  stochastic 
nature  of  interactions.  Psyche  94:  81-91. 

O'Donncll,  S.  199S.  Reproductive  caste  determination  in  eusocial  wasps  (Hymenoptera:  Vespidae). 
Annual  Review  of  Fntomology  43:  323-346. 

Russell,  C.  B.  and  F.  F.  Hunter.  2002.  Analysis  of  nectar  and  honeydew  feeding  in  Acdes  and 
Ochlerotutus  mosquitoes.  Journal  of  the  American  Mosquito  Control  Association  18:  86-90. 


54  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

FIRST  RECORD  OF  STICTHIPPUS  CALIFORNICUS 

(ORTHOPTERA:  ACRIDIDAE) 

OUTSIDE  CALIFORNIA,  U.S.A.1 

Thomas  A.  Stidhanr 

Sticthippus  californicus  (Scudder),  originally  described  in  the  genus  Hippis- 
cus  from  Gilroy,  Santa  Clara  County,  California  (Scudder,  1892),  is  widespread 
in  California  and  economically  important  (Strohecker  et  al.,  1968;  Otte,  1984). 
At  present,  S.  californicus  has  been  reported  solely  from  California  (Strohecker 
et  al.,  1968;  Otte,  1984;  Heifer,  1987).  On  May  31,  2002,  in  western  Nevada,  I 
collected  two  adult  males  of  S.  californicus  and  observed  other  individuals 
approximately  3  miles  south  of  state  highway  722,  southwest  of  Eastgate  in 
Churchill  County  (lat.  39°  16'  15"  N,  long.  117°  53'  27"  W).  The  two  males  (now 
deposited  in  the  Essig  Museum  at  the  University  of  California  at  Berkeley)  were 
collected  with  Cratypedes  lateritius  (Saussure)  in  an  area  with  abundant  sage- 
brush (Artemisia  spinescens  Eaton).  The  two  male  specimens  have  red  hind 
tibia,  hind  wings  with  a  yellow  basal  area,  a  bilobed  rather  than  trilobed  epiphal- 
lus,  and  other  morphological  characters  consistent  with  specimens  from  Cali- 
fornia (Otte,  1984).  The  Nevada  specimens  are  darker  overall  than  that  illustrat- 
ed by  Otte  (1984),  but  are  within  the  range  of  variation  exhibited  by  Sticthippus 
californicus  specimens  in  the  Essig  Museum. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  wish  to  thank  C.  Barr  (Essig  Museum)  for  access  to  specimens,  and  D.  E.  Erwin  and  H.  E. 
Schorn  (U.C.  Museum  of  Paleontology)  for  their  assistance  in  the  field. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Heifer,  J.  R.   1987.  How  to  know  the  grasshoppers,  crickets,  cockroaches  and  their  allies.  Dover 
Publications,  New  York.  363  pp. 

Otte,  D.   1984.  The  North  American  grasshoppers.  Volume  II  Acrididae  Oedipodinae.  Harvard  Uni- 
versity Press,  Cambridge.  366  pp. 

Scudder,  S.  H.   1892.  The  orthopteran  genus  Hippiscus-lV.  Pysche  6:  317-320. 

Strohecker,  H.  F.,  W.  W.  Middlekauff,  and  D.  C.  Rentz.   1968.  The  grasshoppers  of  California 
(Orthoptera:  Acrididae).  Bulletin  of  the  California  Insect  Survey  10:  1-177. 


1  Received  on  January  16,  2003.  Accepted  on  June  23,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Biology,  Texas  A&M  University,  3258  TAMU,  College  Station,  TX  77843-3258. 
E-mail:  furcula(a!tnail. bio. tamu.edu. 

Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


Vol.  1 1 5,  No.  1 ,  January  &  February  2004 55_ 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

INSECT  MEALS  FROM  A  LEPTODACTYLID  FROG 

(AMPHIBIA:  LEPTODACTYIDAE) 
IN  DOMINICAN  AMBER  (MIOCENE,  23  MA)1 

Scott  R.  Anderson2 

Dominican  amber  is  renowned  for  both  its  clarity  and  taxonomic  breadth  of 
biological  inclusions.  Nearly  every  insect  order  and  a  variety  of  small  vertebrates 
have  been  found  in  Dominican  amber.  Though  insects  are  sometimes  observed 
with  vertebrate  inclusions,  most  are  not  directly  associated  with  the  vertebrate, 
simply  being  victims  of  the  same  entombment.  A  few  vertebrates  have  been 
observed  with  dipteran  larvae  surrounding  them  (Grimaldi,  1996;  Poinar  and 
Cannatella,  1987),  showing  that  the  decay  was  in  progress  when  entombment 
occurred.  The  stomach  contents  consisting  of  several  distinct  insect  meals  of  a 
leptodactylid  frog  in  23  million-year-old  Dominican  Amber  is  herein  described, 
and  is  the  first  direct  evidence  of  insects  associated  with  a  vertebrate  during  its 
lifetime. 

The  partial  insects  comprising  the  frog's  stomach  contents  were  primarily 
examined  under  a  binocular/stereo  dissecting  scope,  utilizing  a  variable  zoom 
range  of  15  to  90  times  magnification.  Lighting  was  supplied  from  above  (direct) 
and  below  (backlighting)  in  varying  intensities.  Photography  was  performed  by 
using  a  dissecting  microscope  (Nikon  SMZ-10)  with  a  digital  camera  connected 
to  a  personal  computer  equipped  with  the  software  program  Auto-Montage. 
Auto-Montage  integrates  images  taken  at  slightly  different  focal  planes  and 
endows  the  newly  formed  images  with  extended  depth  of  field.  Measurements 
were  taken  with  a  standard  ruler  calibrated  in  millimeters. 

The  stomach  contents  consisting  of  several  distinct  insect  meals  are  located 
adjacent  to  the  upper  surface  of  the  leptodactylid  frog's  tongue.  The  tongue  is  ap- 
proximately 7  mm  long  from  base  to  apex.  The  stomach  contents  occur  on  the 
anterior  portion  of  the  tongue,  being  approximately  3  mm  long  by  2  mm  height. 
The  stomach  contents  are  partially  obscured  by  the  well-preserved  upper  portions 
of  the  hind  leg  (femur  and  tibiofibula  present,  as  well  as  muscles,  tendons,  and 
skin).  Figure  1  shows  the  location  of  the  leptodactylid  frog's  tongue  and  stomach 
contents:  the  three  lowermost  arrows  point  to  the  tongue  while  a  fourth  arrow 
indicates  the  insect  meals.  Rotation  and  realignment  of  the  specimen  allows  for 
the  careful  examination  of  the  partial  insect  within  the  stomach  contents. 

The  stomach  contents  can  be  divided  into  two  main  areas:  a  distinct  partial 
hind  leg  and  a  rounded  mass  of  indistinct,  partially  digested  insects,  approxi- 


1  Received  on  August  20,  2004.  Accepted  on  September  23,  2004. 

-Tetra  Tech  NUS,  Inc.,  661  Andersen  Drive,  Foster  Plaza,  Building  #7,  Fifth  Floor,  Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania  15220  U.S.A.  E-mail:  AndersonS@ttnus.com. 

Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


56  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


mately  2  mm  long  by  2  mm  wide.  The  distinct  partial  hind  leg  occurs  close  to  the 
anterior  portion  of  the  tongue  and  is  obscured  from  most  views  by  the  femur  and 
skin  of  the  frog.  The  tarsus,  tibia,  and  a  portion  of  the  femur  are  visible  and  are 
all  well  preserved.  The  preserved  portion  of  the  femur  is  approximately  1  mm, 
while  the  tibia  and  tarsus  each  measure  approximately  2  mm.  A  portion  of  the  tar- 
sus is  obscured  by  the  rounded  mass  of  insect  partials.  Though  incomplete,  the 
femur  is  thickened  compared  to  the  tibia.  The  tibia  has  at  least  five  spines.  The 
spines  are  relatively  long  (longer  than  tibia  diameter)  and  appear  movable. 
Based  on  the  observed  characteristics,  this  insect  meal  was  likely  a  common 
ground  cricket  (Orthoptera:  Gryllidae:  Nemobinnae).  Due  to  the  awkward  rota- 
tion required  to  view  this  portion  of  the  stomach  contents  and  the  resultant  irreg- 
ular surface  created,  photography  of  this  feature  has  not  yet  proved  successful. 


Fig.  1  Location  of  the 
tongue  and  stomach 
contents  of  the 
leptodactylid  frog 
entombed  in  23 
million-year-old 
Dominican  Amber. 


The  second  area  of  stomach  contents  that  are  observed  consists  of  a  rounded 
mass  of  insect  partials  approximately  2  mm  long  by  2  mm  height.  Though  par- 
tially obscured  by  the  femur  and  tibiofibula  of  the  frog,  most  details  of  this  area 
are  readily  observable  when  the  specimen  is  rotated.  Overall,  this  portion  of  the 
stomach  contents  appears  to  be  a  clumping  of  insect  partials  in  a  definite  round- 
ed mass.  Most  of  the  partial  insects  are  indistinguishable,  sclerotized  portions  of 
unidentifiable  insects,  exhibiting  little  recognizable  structure  besides  the  general 
sclerotized  appearance.  This  is  evidence  of  their  partial  digestion.  One,  very 
well-preserved  slightly  clubbed,  11 -segmented,  antenna  is  observed.  A  second 
antenna  is  also  observed  (appears  to  be  the  counterpart  to  the  well-preserved 
antenna),  but  is  deteriorated  and  total  number  of  segments  cannot  be  determined. 
Figure  2  shows  this  second  area  of  stomach  contents.  The  very  well-preserved, 
slightly  clubbed  antenna  is  designated  by  an  arrow,  while  a  second  arrow  shows 
the  clumped,  deteriorated  insect  partials. 

Though  two  hymenopterans  (families  undetermined)  are  observed  within  the 
amber  specimen,  the  partial  insects  that  comprise  the  stomach  contents  of  the 


Vol.  115,  No.  1,  January  &  February  2004 


57 


Fig.  2 

Close-up  of  second  area 
of  stomach  contents 
(clumped  partial  insects 
shown  in  Figure  1 ). 


frog  are  the  only  ones  located  in  close  proximity  to  the  frog.  Their  deteriorated 
appearance  shows  that  they  were  partially  digested.  At  least  two  meals  are  iden- 
tifiable within  the  stomach  contents,  although  more  are  possible  based  on  the 
general  deteriorated  state  of  the  insect  mass.  Regardless  of  the  total  number  of 
insect  meals,  finding  both  the  soft  tissue  tongue  and  stomach  contents  of  a  fossil 
frog  is  phenomenal. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

Special  thanks  are  given  to  my  wife  Heidi  for  allowing  me  to  purchase  the  frog  from  Roy  Larimer 
in  2000  and  for  her  understanding  and  patience  u  hile  I  research  this  unique  and  interesting  specimen. 
I  am  also  grateful  to  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay  (Department  of  Paleobiology,  National  Museum  of 
Natural  History,  Washington,  DC,  USA)  and  Patrick  R.  Craig  (Monte  Rio,  California,  USA)  for  their 
invaluable  input  and  critique. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Crimaldi,  D.  A.   1996.  Amber:  Window  to  the  Past,  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Harry 
N.  Abrams,  Inc.,  New  York,  N,  U.S.A.  216  pp. 

Poinar,  Jr.,  G.  O.   1992.  Life  in  Amber,  Stanford  University  Press.  Stanford,  California,  U.S.A.  350 

pp. 

Poinar,  Jr.,  G.  O.  and  D.  C.  Cannatclla.   1987.  An  Upper  Eocene  Frog  from  the  Dominican 
Republic  and  Its  Implication  for  Caribbean  Biogeography,  Science,  Volume  237.  pp  1215-1216. 

Poinar,  Jr.,  G.  O.  and  R.  Poinar.   1999.  The  Amber  Forest:  A  Reconstruction  of  a  Vanished  World, 
Princeton  University  Press,  Princeton,  New  Jersey,  U.S.A.  239  pp. 


58  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BOOK  REVIEW 

EARLY  AMERICAN  NATURALISTS.  EXPLORING  THE  AMERICAN  WEST  1 804- 
1900.  J.  Moring.  2002.  Cooper  Square  Press.  200  Park  Avenue  South,  Suite  1109.  New 
York,  NY  10003-1503  U.S.A.  241  pp.  Hardcover.  ISBN  0-8154-1236-3. 

Early  American  Naturalists  Exploring  the  American  West  1804-1900,  delineates  some  of  the  trajectories 
of  natural  history  in  the  United  States  during  the  post  Lewis  and  Clark  portion  of  the  19th  century  from  three 
different  and  interlacing  perspectives:  chronological,  biographical,  and  thematic.  Fortunately,  this  book  is 
more  than  a  chronology,  a  collection  of  biographies,  or  an  abstract  discourse.  Throughout  his  book,  Moring 
emphasizes  three  major  themes:  1)  the  human  face  of  scientific  research,  2)  the  links  between  science  and 
politics,  and  3)  the  progressive  specialization  of  biology  as  the  19th  century  came  to  a  closure.  I  detail  those 
topics  in  the  following  paragraphs. 

Moring  describes  the  lives  of  numerous  early  explorers,  including  the  multiple  difficulties  19th  century  nat- 
uralists working  in  the  U.S.A.  had  to  face  to  get  research  done  (e.g.  the  tragic  loss  of  life,  such  as  that  of  David 
Douglas,  and/or  specimens,  including  Thomas  Say's,  the  father  of  American  entomology,  inability  to  keep  his 
specimens  well  preserved)  and  their  often  extraordinary  personalities.  The  preservationist  attitudes  of  John 
Muir  (pronounced  Miur)  contrast  starkly  with  the  less  than  ideal  research  methods  and  personal  ambitions  of 
vertebrate  paleontologists  Cope  and  Marsh.  After  reading  the  book,  well  seasoned  practitioners  of  natural  his- 
tory, and  even  those  on  the  sidelines  will  wonder  how  little  some  of  the  human  aspects  of  science  have 
changed.  The  book  is  sprinkled  with  humor  (e.g.  Audubon's  depictions  of  imaginary  fish  precipitously 
described  by  the  prolific  Rafmisque  or  NuttalFs  use  of  his  rifle  as  a  botanical  digging  tool).  Characters  of  some 
notoriety  in  United  States  history  (e.g.  Aaron  Burr  and  P.  T.  Barnum),  those  known  more  within  museum  cir- 
cles (e.g.  Spencer  Baird,  third  Secretary  of  the  Smithsonian  Institution  and  his  extensive  network  of  collectors 
that  helped  making  the  "nation's  attic"  a  world  class  natural  history  collection)  or,  sadly,  faculty  members  who 
allegedly  exploited  students  for  their  own  benefit,  parade  in  front  of  us,  with  their  virtues  and  faults. 

Early  American  Naturalists  is  filled  with  examples  of  how  naturalists  from  the  incipient  nation,  especial- 
ly from  the  city  of  Philadelphia  (Pennsylvania),  the  major  intellectual  center  of  the  United  States  during  most 
of  the  19th  century,  navigated  the  treacherous  political  waters  to  land  favorable  positions.  Letters  of  recom- 
mendation from  influential  notables,  then  as  now,  came  in  handy  for  some  hopefuls.  By  the  middle  third  of 
the  19th  century,  passionate  adventurers  from  all  works  of  life  and  some  who  wanted  to  avoid  becoming 
involved  in  the  American  Civil  War  had  joined  the  ranks  of  the  natural  historians.  Wave  after  wave  headed 
west  and,  as  if  they  had  Copland's  "Rodeo"  as  a  background,  national  and  international  naturalists  became 
part  of  the  American  expansion. 

As  the  19th  century  comes  to  an  end,  the  emphasis  gradually  shifts  from  general  collecting  by  people  with 
little  formal  preparation  to  generally  more  careful  study  and  selective  collecting  by  those  with  more  exten- 
sive academic  preparation  (e.g.  the  "Scientifics"  of  Wilkes'  expedition  or  the  geological  or  biological  sur- 
veys). Also,  the  academic  motivations  also  slowly  moved  from  discovering  biodiversity  to  finding  overarch- 
ing biological  principles  that  help  understand  what  has  been  collected.  It  is  in  this  context  that  Darwin's  evo- 
lutionary hypothesis  appears  in  a  timely  fashion  and  on  generally  fertile  grounds.  Although  American  Natural 
History  is  dominated  by  men,  the  lives  of  several  notable  women,  such  as  Martha  Maxwell  and  Florence 
Merriam  Bailey,  are  described  in  considerable  detail. 

While  I  truly  enjoyed  reading  Early  American  Naturalists,  this  work  would  have  benefited  from  a  more 
extensive  "Further  Reading"  section  (including  references  to  the  abundant  resources  of  the  internet)  to  reach 
readers  avid  to  learn  about  major  events  (e.g.  Louisiana  Purchase,  financial  crisis  of  1857),  people  (e.g.  Asa 
Gray,  John  Wesley  Powell),  places  or  institutions  (e.g.  Peale  family  and  their  museum  -  see  back  cover  of  this 
issue  -  U.S.  Biological  Survey),  and  routes  of  early  explorers  (e.g.  Pike,  Long,  Custis)  could  have  been  direct- 
ed to.  In  spite  of  these  drawbacks,  Early  American  Naturalists  Exploring  the  American  West  is  a  good  intro- 
duction to  the  subject  and  nicely  brings  to  the  forefront  part  of  the  Zeitgeist  of  the  American  1 9th  century. 
Those  little  or  not  familiarized  with  the  historical  context  of  19th  century  natural  history  in  the  United  States 
will  benefit  from  reading  this  book. 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay,  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121 

National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution 

P.O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A. 

E-mail:  santiago-blay(fl'nmnh. si.edu. 

Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


Vol.  115,  No.  1,  January  &  February  2004 59_ 

BOOK  REVIEW 

NIGHT  VISIONS.  The  Secret  Designs  of  Moths.  Joseph  Scheer.  2003.  Prestel 
Publishing.  175  Fifth  Avenue,  Suite  402,  New  York,  NY  10010  USA.  199  pp. 
HARDCOVER  US$30.60  (approximately). 

To  read  Night  Visions  is  to  hold  a  work  of  art,  the  result  of  an  obsession  that  originated  by  acci- 
dent. This  work  is  totally  dedicated  to  moths,  turning  any  previous  fears  of  these  "misconceived  crea- 
tures of  the  night"  into  adoration  and  wonder.  This  work  entices  readers'  eyes,  beginning  with  a  table 
of  contents  hidden  under  a  two-page  wide  -  each  page  is  1 1.5"  by  13.5"  -  wing  of  a  Hyalophora 
cecropia  saturniid.  Moth  images  are  magnified  many  times,  revealing  magnificent  details  that  are 
only  possible  to  see  with  microscopes  or  very  good  hand  lenses. 

Night  Visions  is  less  of  a  scientific  read  and  more  of  a  visual  appreciation  experience.  The  author, 
Joseph  Sheer,  also  an  artist,  printmaker,  and  professor,  introduces  Night  Visions  by  describing  how 
his  obsession  with  moths  of  all  shapes  and  sizes  originated.  He  describes  how  he  had  tested  a  new 
scanner  by  snaring  a  live  house  fly  inside.  The  elaborate  structures,  which  were  revealed  by  fourteen 
thousand  pixels  per  inch,  sparked  Scheer's  curiosity  in  other  insects.  This  sole  incident  seeded  years 
of  artistic  and  entomological  growth  for  the  author.  Sheer  describes  his  personal  experiences  with 
moths  in  a  storytelling  fashion.  He  brings  these  night-dwelling  creatures  into  a  lively  spotlight. 

Night  Visions '  contents  include  three  chapters  entitled:  "Attracted  to  Light"  by  Joseph  Scheer; 
"Moths:  Species  Rich,  but  Little  Known"  by  Marc  Epstein;  and  "Nature's  Art  and  Technological 
Imagination"  by  Johanna  Drucker.  These  write-ups  are  preceded  by  a  selection  of  72  plates  of  moth 
imagery  -  the  creme  de  la  creme  among  the  thousands  of  scans  Scheer  has  made  through  the  years  - 
followed  by  a  list  of  featured  moths,  their  classification,  and  wingspan  dimensions.  Small  plate  num- 
bers and  the  scientific  are  printed  on  each  image  so  as  not  to  distract  the  readers'  focus  from  the 
moths'  microscopic  intricacies  and  immeasurable  beauty.  Some  images  are  full  body  while  others  are 
close  ups  of  the  head,  antennae,  or  textured  wing  patterns.  The  only  shortcomings  I  noticed  are  small 
portions  of  some  images  that  are  slightly  out  of  focus. 

Scheer's  "Attracted  to  Light"  points  out  that  there  are  one  hundred  and  fifty  thousand  species  of 
moths,  eight  times  the  number  of  their  better  known  and  more  popular  siblings,  the  butterflies. 
Epstein's  "Moths:  Species  Rich,  but  Little  Known,"  touches  on  the  classification,  descriptions,  and 
identifications  of  each  featured  species.  This  teaser  is  a  vignette  of  questions  and  answers  brought  up 
by  the  study  of  moths,  such  as  the  possible  explanations  for  moths'  attraction  to  lights  and  the  prob- 
able significance  of  their  complex  mimetic  color  patterns.  Lastly,  "Nature's  Art  and  Technological 
Imagination"  by  Drucker  is  a  well-written  history  of  science  and  image  translation.  She  presents  an 
original  and  poetic  explanation  of  the  images  in  the  book  as  "artwork,  not  scientific  records."  "Artis- 
tic expression  with  sophisticated  tools"  that  helps  you  visually  meditate  on  the  extreme  detail.  She 
states  how  technology  assists  us  to  "see  first  and  intellectualize  afterwards."  Despite  this  book's  acci- 
dental origin,  it  is  an  inspiring  visual  documentary  of  the  author's  work.  While  Scheer's  solo  exhibi- 
tions are  limited  by  the  space  provided,  this  book  portrays  over  a  hundred  beautiful  species  of  moths. 
Night  Visions  enriches  the  understanding  of  moth  biodiversity  for  the  non-expert  reader  and  gen- 
uinely sensitizes  us  to  the  world  of  moths. 

Katherine  Marie  Schuler 

Corcoran  College  of  Art  and  Design 

Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20006  USA 

E-mail:  katie_miamifl(a hotmail.com. 


Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


60  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BOOK  REVIEW 

BUGS  BEFORE  TIME:  PREHISTORIC  INSECTS  AND  THEIR  RELA- 
TIVES. Cathy  Camper.  Illustrated  by  Steve  Kirk.  2002.  Simon  &  Schuster 
Books  for  Young  Readers.  40  pp.  ISBN  0-689-82092-5.  US$16.95. 

Cathy  Camper  tells  readers  right  from  the  beginning  to  quit  worrying  about  insects  taking 
over  Earth  in  the  future  —  "...scientists  who  work  with  insects  know  that  bugs  have  already 
taken  over!"  This  picture  book's  brightly  colored  illustrations,  many  drawn  from  eye-popping 
perspective  near  ground  level,  make  turning  pages  rewarding.  Descriptions  of  fossil  insects  and 
their  modern  descendants  reinforce  for  children  the  immensely  long  history  of  arthropods. 
Topics  covered  include  insect  evolution;  relatives  (e.g.  eurypterids,  trilobites,  spiders,  and  cen- 
tipedes); the  formation  of  fossils;  development  of  wings  and  flight;  continental  drift;  and  geo- 
logic time.  Steve  Kirk's  intriguing  artwork  highlights  the  ordinary,  such  as  cockroaches  and 
dragonflies,  as  well  as  the  amazing — Titanopterous,  a  gigantic  grasshopper-like  insect  with  a 
wingspan  of  14  inches.  Dinosaurs  and  appropriate  flora  complete  the  scenes.  There  are  answers 
to  the  questions,  why  study  insects?  and,  more  importantly,  why  study  fossil  insects?  With  a 
well-tuned  understanding  of  what  interests  children,  Camper  illustrates  points  with  familiar  ref- 
erences, often  related  to  size:  "Imagine  trying  to  stomp  on  a  cockroach  almost  as  big  as  your 
shoe!"  Prehistoric  Arthropleura  was  "probably  bigger  than  your  mom."  Descriptions  include 
correct  scientific  terminology,  such  as:  cerci,  ovipositor,  chelicerae,  and  others.  Insect  classes 
are  referred  to  by  name:  Diploda  (millipedes),  Chilopoda  (centipedes),  Protodonata  (ancient 
dragonfly  look-alikes),  etc.  A  bibliography  and  pronunciation  glossary  completes  the  lively 
text.  Bugs  Before  Time:  Prehistoric  Insects  and  Their  Relatives  is  an  absorbing  choice  for 
young  bug  enthusiasts  from  ages  6  to  10. 

Suzanne  Mclntire,  Arlington,  Virginia,  U.S.A. 
E-mail:  maxintire@comcast.net. 


Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


Reviewers.  When  submitting  papers,  all  authors  are  requested  to  provide  the  names  of  two  qual- 
ified individuals  who  have  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  before  it  is  submitted  to  Entomological 
News.  The  receipt  of  all  papers  will  be  acknowledged  and,  if  accepted,  they  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  possible. 

All  papers,  except  book  reviews,  are  forwarded  to  experts  for  final  review  before  acceptance.  In 
order  to  expedite  the  review  process,  authors  are  also  asked  to  suggest  the  name,  address,  email,  tele- 
phone and  fax  of  at  least  three  experts  in  the  subject  field  to  whom  the  manuscript  may  be  forward- 
ed for  additional  review.  Ideally,  the  review  process  should  be  completed  within  30  days.  The  editor 
reserves  his  prerogative  of  sending  the  manuscript  to  other  reviewers.  Authors  are  also  welcome  to 
list  the  names  of  reviewers  to  whom  the  article  should  not  be  sent,  with  a  brief  explanation. 

Upon  return  of  reviews,  authors  will  be  asked  to  modify  or  rewrite  their  texts  to  accommodate 
suggestions  of  the  reviewers  and  the  editor  as  well  as  to  conform  to  requirements  of  Entomological 
News.  If  authors  do  not  modify  their  texts,  they  should  specifically  address,  on  a  point  by  point  basis, 
why  they  are  not  doing  that. 

Page  Proofs.  The  printer  will  send  page  proofs  to  the  editor  and  the  business  manager.  Faith 
Kuehn.  Then,  the  proofs  will  be  sent  to  the  corresponding  author  as  .pdf  files,  together  with  the 
reprint  order  form  as  an  .rtf  file.  Authors  must  process  proofs  and  return  them  to  the  editor  and  to  the 
business  editor  by  air  mail  or  e-mail  (attachment).  Authors  who  anticipate  being  absent  are  urged  to 
provide  forwarding  addresses  or  to  provide  temporary  addresses  (with  dates).  Proofs  not  approved 
within  one  week  will  be  published  as  is.  The  editor  will  collect  the  page  proofs  and  send  them  to  the 
printer. 

Page  and  Reprint  Charges.  Charges  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  are  US$25.00  per 
printed  page  (or  part)  for  members  and  US$30.00  per  printed  page  (or  part)  for  nonmembers.  Authors 
will  be  charged  for  all  text  figures  and  halftones  at  the  rate  of  US$30.00  each,  regardless  of  size. 
These  charges  were  approved  by  the  American  Entomological  Society  Council  for  the  2003-2004 
United  States  Fiscal  year.  Authors  will  pay  for  color  printing  at  the  going  rate.  There  are  no  discounts. 
There  are  no  page  charges  for  book  reviews.  Page  and  reprint  charges  will  be  billed  by  Faith  Kuehn. 
to  whom  communications  and  remittances  of  page  charges  and  reprints  should  be  sent.  FK  address 
is:  3789  Foulk  Road,  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania  19061  U.S.A.  E-mail:  fbkuehn@yahoo.com. 

Articles  longer  than  20  printed  pages  of  Entomological  News  may  be  published  in  two  or  more 
installments,  unless  the  author  is  willing  to  pay  the  entire  cost  of  a  sufficient  number  of  additional 
pages  in  any  one  issue  to  enable  such  an  article  to  appear  without  division. 

If  hard  copy  reprints  are  desired,  they  must  be  ordered  together  with  the  proofs.  Reprints  as  .pdf 
files  are  available  for  the  authors.  For  options  and  charges,  contact  the  business  manager. 

Entomological  News  is  printed  by  Dover  Litho  Printing  Company,  1211  North  DuPont  Highway, 
Dover,  Delaware  19901  U.S.A.  Telephone  (302)  678-121 1;  fax:  (302)  678-8091:  toll-free  telephone 
(800)366-9132;  Web  Page:  www.doverlitho.com.  Dover  Litho  has  been  recognized  by  DENREC  and 
DELRAP  Green  Industries  as  "The  Most  Environmentally  Conscious  Printer  in  the  State  of  Dela- 
ware." 

Entomological  News  is  available  in  microform  from  ProQuest  Information  and  Learning.  Call 
toll-free  (800)  521-3042,  (800)  521-0600,  (734)  761-4700.  Mail  inquiry  to:  ProQuest  Information 
and  Learning,  300  North  Zeeb  Road.  Ann  Arbor,  Michigan  48106-9866  U.S.A. 

Entomological  News  is  listed  in  the  Science  Citation  Index  Expanded. 


SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  FEBRUARY  24,  2004 
The  Historic  Titian  Peale  Butterfly  and  Moth  Collection 

Jason  D.  Weintraub 
Department  of  Entomology,  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 

The  Society's  first  meeting  of  2004  highlighted 
one  of  the  oldest  entomological  collections  in  the 
Western  Hemisphere,  the  Titian  Peale  Butterfly  and 
Moth  Collection,  housed  at  The  Academy  of  Natural 
Sciences.  Titian  Peale  was  a  prominent  early  natural- 
ist, a  contemporary  and  collaborator  of  Thomas  Say, 
and  the  youngest  son  of  the  large  family  of  artists  and 
naturalists  headed  by  Charles  Willson  Peale  of  Phila- 
delphia. Peale  went  on  some  of  the  earliest  exploring 
expeditions  as  a  naturalist,  including  a  trip  to  Florida 
in  1817  when  it  was  still  in  Spanish  hands,  the  Long 
Expedition  in  1 820,  first  exploring  the  land  between 
the  Mississippi  and  the  southern  Rocky  Mountains, 
and  the  four-year  Wilkes  Expedition  in  the  1840s  to 
South  America  and  the  Pacific  Rim.  During  his  long 
life  until  his  death  in  1885,  Peale  continued  his  pur- 
suit of  Lepidoptera,  with  his  personal  collection  pro- 
tected from  light,  dermestid  beetles  and  moisture  in 

specially  designed  boxes  of  Peale's  own  construction.  These  boxes,  and  specifical- 
ly the  book  covers,  allowed  Peale  to  record  a  significant  amount  of  data  for  these 
specimens,  something  lacking  for  most  specimens  prepared  by  his  contemporaries. 
Jason  Weintraub  examined  the  collection  in  a  wonderfully  illustrated  talk,  taking 
note  of  the  highlights  of  the  collection,  including  extinct  species,  species  new  to  sci- 
ence, and  assemblages  of  species  from  rare  or  threatened  habitats.  Weintraub  also 
discussed  the  project  funded  by  a  Save  America  s  Treasures  grant  that  has  allowed 
the  boxes  to  be  cleaned,  restored  and  preserved,  and  the  specimens  to  be  repaired 
and  individually  photographed  and  catalogued.  This  digital  catalogue  is  expected  to 
be  available  later  this  year  in  a  web-accessible  form  on-line. 

Several  Peale  boxes  were  on  display  to  accompany  the  evening's  talk.  In  other 
notes,  Mr.  Marcos  Lhano,  of  Montevideo,  Uruguay,  was  introduced;  he  is  spending 
approximately  six  months  studying  the  grasshopper  subfamily  Leptysminae  in  the 
Orthoptera  Collection  at  the  Academy.  Over  40  members  and  visitors  were  present 
at  the  meeting. 

Jon  Gelhaus,  President  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (1997-2003) 
Corresponding  Sec.  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (2003-present) 

E-mail:  gelhaus@acnatsci.org. 


Titian  R.  Peale  (1799-1885) 

Image  courtesy  of  the 

Academy  of 
Natural  Sciences,  Philadelphia 


f  ?  T.?.S??'AN  INSTTUTION  LIBRARIES 


Mailed  on  November  12,  2004 


39088011158326 


|£=S-3' 
M' 


MARCH  &  APRIL  2004 


USISSN  0013-872X 
No.  2 


OLOGICAL  NEWS 


First  record  of  Caenocholax  fenyesi  (Strepsiptera:  Myrmecolacidae)  parasitizing 
Solenopsis  invicta  (Hymenoptera:  Formicidae)  in  Argentina,  with  a  discussion 
on  its  distribution  and  host  range 

Jerry  L.  Cook,  Luis  A.  Calcaterra,  and  Lucas  Nunez      61 

Three  new  species  of  Apogonalia  from  the  Dominican  Republic  (Homoptera, 

Cicadellidae,  Cicadellinae)  Paul  H.  Freytag     67 

Introduction  of  the  millipede,  Cleidogena  nantahala  Shear,  in  New  England, 
U.S.A.  (Diplopoda,  Chordeumatida,  Cleidogonidae) 

William  A.  Shear  and  Rowland  M.  Shelley      71 

Occurrences  of  the  centipedes,  Scolopendra  morsitans  L.  and  S.  subpinipes  Leach, 
on  Pacific  Islands  (Chilopoda:  Scolopendromorpha:  Scolopendridae) 

Rowland  M.  Shelley     78 

Higher  classification  of  the  burrowing  mayflies  (Ephemeroptera:  Scapphodonta) 

W.  P.  McCafferty     84 

New  state  and  provincial  records  for  North  American  small  minnow  mayflies 
(Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae) 

W.  P.  McCafferty,  M.  D.  Meyer,  J.  M.  Webb,  and  Luke  M.  Jacobus      93 

Titsona  tida  Chamberlin,  1962,  a  synonym  of  Chon eiulus  palmatus  (Nemec,  1895) 
(Diplopoda:  Julida:  Blaniulidae),  with  new  North  American  locality  records 

Rowland  M.  Shelley  and  Henrik  Enghoff  101 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTES: 

Description  of  seven  new  species  of  Janbechynea  (Orsodacnidae  or  Chrysomelidae, 
sensu  lato)  from  Mexico:  availability  of  new  names  and  corrections 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay    108 

A  record  of  the  Arctic  forestfly,  Nemoura  arctica  (Plecoptera:  Nemouridae),  from 
the  contiguous  United  States  B.  C.  Kondratieff  and  R.  W.  Baumann    113 

A  fourth  Floridian  record  of  the  centipede  genus  Rhysida  Wood,  1862;  potential 
establishment  of/?.  /.  longipes  (Newport,  1845)  in  Miami-Dade  County 
(Scolopendromorpha:  Scolopendridae:  Otostigminae) 

Rowland  M.  Shelley  and  G.  B.  Edwards    1 1 6 


BOOK  REVIEW: 

Fossil  Revolution.  The  Finds  That  Changed  Our^Vj 
Douglas  Palmer 


SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  MARCH  24,  201 


e  Past  by 

I*    tjt^fftlt.       _  .  _ 

//s'I/\  Back  Cover 
'     f    200&on  Qelhaus    120 
Rlt: 


THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

MAILED  ON  DECEMBER  21,  2004 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS,  THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY,  AND 
NEW  GUIDELINES  FOR  AUTHORS  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 

Entomological  News  is  published  bimonthly  except  July-August  by  The  American  Entomological 
Society,  which  is  headquartered  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway, 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195  United  States  of  America.  AES  can  be  reached,  as  follows:  telephone  (215) 
561-3978;  fax  (215)  299-1028;  e-mail,  aes@acnatsci.org  and  website:  http://www.  acnatsci.org/hosted/aes. 
Information  on  the  Calvert  Award  for  insect-related  study  by  a  young  person  in  the  Delaware  Valley  region 
sponsored  by  The  American  Entomological  Society  can  be  found  at:  http://www.udel.edu/chem/white/ 
Odonata/CalvertAwd.html 

Subscriptions  to  and  Back  Issues  of  Entomological  News.  Private  subscriptions  for  personal  use  of 
members  of  the  society  are  US  $15  per  year  prepaid.  Subscriptions  for  institutions,  such  as  libraries,  lab- 
oratories, etc.  and  nonmembers,  are  US$30  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  in  the  USA  and  US  $34  per 
year  prepaid  for  those  located  outside  the  USA.  Back  issues  when  available  are  sold  by  complete  volume, 
for  US  $15  to  members,  and  US  $30  to  nonmembers.  Membership/  subscription  application  and  additional 
information  is  available  at:  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/  subscription.html.  Please  send  inquiries  or 
send  completed  membership  form  to:  Office  Manager  at  the  address  above,  e-mail:  aes@say.acnatsci.org. 
or  call  (2 15)  56 1-3978. 

Previous  editors  of  Entomological  News:  1890  Eugene  Murray-Aaron  (1852-1940);  1890-1920 
Henry  Skinner  (186 1-1926);  1921-1944  Philip  P.  Calvert  (1871-  1961);  1945-1967  R.G.  Schmieder(  1898- 
1967);  1968-1972  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.  (1919-1999);  1973-1974  R.W.  Lake;  1974-2002  Howard  P.  Boyd; 
2002-2003  F.  Christian  Thompson  and  Michael  Pogue. 

New  Guidelines  for  authors  of  Entomological  News: 

Further  guidelines  can  be  found  on 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/instructions.htm 

Subject  Coverage:  Entomology,  sensu  lato.  Manuscripts  on  systematics,  ecology,  evolution,  mor- 
phology, physiology,  behavior,  biodiversity,  conservation,  paleobiology,  and  other  aspects  of  insect  and 
terrestrial  arthropod  life  as  well  as  nomenclature,  biographies  and  history  of  entomology,  among  others, 
are  appropriate  topics  for  papers  submitted  to  Entomological  News.  Papers  on  applied,  economic,  and  reg- 
ulatory entomology  or  on  toxicology  and  related  subjects  will  be  considered  only  if  they  also  make  a  major 
contribution  in  one  of  the  aforementioned  fields. 

Any  author  may  submit  papers.  Manuscripts  will  be  accepted  from  any  author,  although,  papers 
from  members  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  are  given  priority.  It  is  suggested  that  all  prospec- 
tive authors  join  the  AES. 

Send  manuscripts,  books  for  review,  and  editorial  correspondence  to  the  editor.  All  manuscripts, 
including  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews,  submitted  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  as  well  as 
all  associated  editorial  communications  must  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay  at  this  address: 
Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121 ,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  P. 
O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  D.C.  20013-7012  U.S.A.  If  an  author  uses  a  mailing  service  that  does  not 
accept  addresses  with  a  P.  O.  Box,  please  use  this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  West  Loading  Dock,  Washington,  District 
of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  Other  means  of  contacting  the  Editor  are,  as  follows:  Phone:  (202)  633-1383, 
Fax:  (202)  786-2832,  e-mails:  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu,  or  blayj@hotmail.com,  or  via  the  webpage  at 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/contact.  htm.  Books  for  review  should  also  be  sent  to  the 
editor  who  will,  in  turn,  give  them  to  a  colleague  for  review. 

Agreement.  By  submitting  a  paper  for  publication,  authors  tacitly  agree  to  not  submit  in  parallel  the 
same  manuscript  to  another  journal.  For  published  papers,  authors  agree  to  accept  responsibility  for  all 
page,  illustration,  and  requested  reprint  charges.  Rejected  manuscripts  will  be  discarded,  except  for  origi- 
nal artwork  and  photographs,  which  will  be  returned  to  the  authors. 

Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews.  These  are  much  shorter  contributions,  typically  not  exceeding 
two  printed  pages.  The  main  difference  between  these  types  of  contributions  and  longer  papers  is  that  sci- 
entific notes  and  book  reviews  lack  an  abstract  and  most  of  the  main  headings,  except  for  the  acknowl- 
edgments and  the  literature  cited  sections. 

Postmaster:  If  undeliverable,  please  send  to 

The  American  Entomological  Society  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway  /  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

THIRD  CLASS  POSTAGE  PAID  AT  DOVER,  DELAWARE  19901  U.S.A. 


Vol.  115.  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004 6_1_ 

FIRST  RECORD  OF  CAENOCHOLAX  FENYESI 
(STREPSIPTERA:  MYRMECOLACIDAE)  PARASITIZING 
SOLENOPSIS INVICTA  (HYMENOPTERA:  FORMICIDAE) 

IN  ARGENTINA,  WITH  A  DISCUSSION  ON  ITS 
DISTRIBUTION  AND  HOST  RANGE1 

Jerry  L.  Cook2,  Luis  A.  Calcaterra',  and  Lucas  Nunez4 

ABSTRACT:  The  first  record  of  Caenocholax  fenyesi  parasitizing  the  red  imported  fire  ant, 
Solenopsis  invicta,  in  South  America  is  documented.  Caenocholax  fenyesi  males  were  collected  from 
colonies  of  5.  invicta  in  northeastern  Argentina.  This  record  helps  to  clarify  the  occurrence  and  host 
utilization  of  C.  fenyesi  in  the  United  States,  where  S.  invicta  is  an  invasive  exotic  species.  This 
record,  along  with  other  recent  reports,  suggests  that  C.  fenvesi  males  are  generalist  parasites,  not  uti- 
lizing a  narrow  host  range,  as  do  most  known  strepsipterans.  However,  the  potential  presence  of  cryp- 
tic species  is  an  alternate  explanation. 

KEY  WORDS:  Solenopsis  invicta,  Caenocholax  fenvesi.  host  association,  distribution,  host  speci- 
ficity, host  switching 

Host  relationships  in  the  strepsipteran  family  Myrmecolacidae  are  poorly 
known.  However,  in  all  species  whose  host  has  been  documented,  a  form  of  het- 
eronomy  exists  (Kathirithamby  1989).  Males  utilize  ants  (Hymenoptera,  Formi- 
cidae)  as  hosts  during  their  developmental  stages,  while  females  use  orthop- 
teroids  for  developmental  stages  and  as  the  host  of  adult  females  (Kathirithamby 
and  Hamilton  1992).  Most  species  of  Myrmecolacidae  are  known  only  from 
males,  which  are  collected  in  their  adult,  free-living  stage.  These  adult  males  are 
rarely  collected  with  a  host  association,  and  hosts  are  currently  known  for  males 
of  eight  of  the  108  myrmecolacid  species  (Wesrwood  1861,  Hofeneder  1949, 
Luna  de  Carvalho,  1972,  1973,  Teson  &  Remes  Lenicov  1979,  Kathirithamby 
1991,  and  Kathirithamby  and  Johnston  1992,  2003).  Additionally,  several  para- 
sitized ant  species  have  been  collected  but  their  associated  strepsipteran  species 
was  not  identified  (Ogloblin  1939,  Hughes  et  al.  2003). 

The  first  host  association  between  Caenocholax  fenyesi  Pierce  and  the  red 
imported  fire  ant,  Solenopsis  invicta  Buren,  was  discovered  by  Kathirithamby 
and  Johnston  (1992)  in  Texas,  USA.  This  host  association  was  considered  as  a 
crossover  host  since  it  appeared  unlikely  that  parasitized  S.  invicta  and  the 
unknown  orthopteroid  female  host  were  both  simultaneously  introduced  and 


1  Received  on  March  31,  2004.  Accepted  on  July  16,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  Sam  Houston  State  University,  Huntsville,  Texas  77341-2116 
U.S.A.   E-mail:  bio_jlc(«ishsu.edu. 

1  USDA-ARS  South  American  Biological  Control  Laboratory,  Bolivar  1559  Hurlingham,  Buenos 
Aires  Province,  Argentina.  E-mail:  trapisondaw  tutopia.com. 

4  USDA-ARS  South  American  Biological  Control  Laboratory,  Bolivar  1559  Hurlingham,  Buenos 
Aires  Province,  Argentina. 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  1 15  (2):  61,  March  &  April  2004 
Mailed  on  December  21,  2004 


62  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


migrated  throughout  the  southeastern  United  States  in  a  span  of  less  than  75  years 
(Cook  1996).  Kathirithamby  and  Hughes  (2002)  discovered  Camponotus  planatus 
Roger  parasitized  by  C.  fenyesi  in  Veracruz,  Mexico,  and  speculated  that  C.  plana- 
tus was  the  original  host  of  C.  fenyesi.  This  discovery  was  from  the  vicinity  of  the 
type  locality  of  C.  fenyesi  (Pierce  1909).  Dolichoderus  bispinosus  Olivier  was  also 
recently  found  hosting  C.  fenyesi  in  the  same  Mexican  locality  (Hughes  et  al. 
2003).  Genetic  studies  by  Kathirithamby  and  Johnston  (2003)  report  that  male  C. 
fenyesi  from  Texas  in  S.  invicta  are  15  percent  divergent  from  the  morphologically 
identical  male  from  Mexico,  parasitic  in  D.  bispinosus.  This  led  them  to  name  C. 
fenyesi  from  Texas  C.  fenyesi  texensis  and  from  Mexico  C.  fenyesi  waloffi. 

The  first  report  of  Caenocholax  in  South  America  was  given  by  Ogloblin  (1939) 
from  collections  in  Argentina  and  Brazil.  Ogloblin  found  male  specimens  in  Phei- 
dole  radoschkowski  reflexans  Santschi  that  he  reported  as  a  new  species  of  Caeno- 
cholax, but  did  not  name  the  strepsipteran  species.  He  found  more  of  this  strep- 
sipteran  species  in  Pheidole  fallax  emiliae  Forel  and  an  additional  undetermined 
Pheidole  species.  Ogloblin  also  found  three  fire  ant  species;  Solenopsis  saevissima 
pylades  Forel  (now  S.  xyloni),  S.  saevissima  quinque  cusp  sis  Forel  (now  S.  quin- 
quecuspis),  and  S.  saevissima  richteri  Forel  (now  S.  richteri)  in  Missiones  and  Salta 
province,  Argentina,  that  he  reported  as  being  parasitized  by  an  undetermined  spec- 
ies of  Myrmecolax.  This  species  was  named  Myrmecolax  ogloblini  by  Luna  de 
Carvalho  (1973).  Later,  Teson  and  Remes  Lenicov  (1979)  observed  specimens  from 
the  Ogloblin  collection  taken  from  the  Pheidole  species  (labeled  as  Caenocholax 
pheidolephagus,  but  never  published)  and  determined  that  they  were  Caenocholax 
brasiliensis  Oliveira  and  Kogan.  Caenocholax  brasiliensis  and  M.  ogloblini  have 
since  been  synonymized  with  C.  fenyesi  (Kathirithamby  and  Hughes  2002). 

The  distribution  of  C.  fenyesi  confirms  that  its  males  must  be  hosted  by  more 
than  one  ant  species,  unless  C.  fenyesi  constitutes  a  species  complex.  Caenocholax 
fenyesi  has  a  currently  known  range  from  the  southern  United  States  to  Chile  and 
Argentina  (Cook  et  al.  1997;  Kathirithamby  and  Hughes  2002).  While  its  known 
distribution  now  appears  disjunct,  it  is  probably  widespread  throughout  this  region. 
New  collections  continue  to  fill  areas  missing  from  the  known  distribution.  The  dis- 
tribution of  S.  invicta  is  well  known,  and  it  is  not  found  in  Mexico,  Central  America, 
or  Ecuador,  where  C.  fenyesi  occurs.  Camponotus  planatus  is  a  widely  distributed 
species,  but  its  northern  limit  includes  only  the  southernmost  part  of  Texas  and  parts 
of  Florida.  Its  southern  distribution  limit  does  not  include  Chile  and  Argentina  (W. 
P.  MacKay  unpublished  data).  In  this  paper  we  make  the  first  report  of  C.  fenyesi 
parasitizing  S.  invicta  in  its  homeland  and  discuss  its  host  relationships. 

NEW  HOST  ASSOCIATION  RECORDS 

Fifteen  Caenocholax  fenyesi  males  were  isolated  from  four  Solenopsis  invicta 
colonies  from  northeastern  Argentina.  The  S.  invicta  colonies  were  being  main- 
tained in  laboratory  rearing  conditions  at  USDA-ARS-SABCL  as  part  of  a  study  of 
preference  of  Pseudacteon  flies  (Diptera:  Phoridae)  for  different  fire  ant  hosts.  Two 
colonies  were  collected  on  September  11,  and  the  others  on  November  20,  2003. 
Three  colonies  were  from  Herradura  (S  26°  31',  W  58°  17'),  Formosa  Province,  on 


Vol.  115,  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 63_ 

the  coast  of  the  Paraguay  River.  The  other  colony  was  collected  near  Centre 
Nacional  de  Desarrollo  Acuicola  (CENADAC),  20  km  from  Corrientes  (S  27°  23', 
W  58°  41'),  Corrientes  Province,  on  the  coast  of  the  Parana  River.  Both  collecting 
sites  are  located  in  the  eastern  limit  of  the  phytogeographical  province  of  the 
Chaco.  This  province  has  a  mean  annual  temperature  of  20  to  23°C  and  an  annual 
rainfall  of  1,200  mm  (Cabrera  and  Willink  1980)  with  a  pronounced  dry  season. 
The  area  where  the  colonies  were  collected  has  a  somewhat  higher  rainfall  because 
it  is  located  near  a  tropical  rain  forest  habitat  and  the  main  rivers  of  the  region 
(Parana  and  Paraguay). 

Colonies  were  collected,  separated  from  the  soil  by  flotation  (Banks  et  al.  1981 ), 
and  housed  in  ventilated  plastic  rearing  trays  (40  x  30  x  15  cm)  with  plastic  cover 
and  a  7-cm  plaster  nest  to  provide  humidity.  Trays  containing  2g  of  worker  ants 
(-3000  ants)  and  2g  of  brood  were  maintained  at  25°C  and  60  percent  RH,  fed 
sugar  water,  and  provided  water  ad  libitum.  The  trays  were  being  examined  daily 
for  the  presence  of  Pseudacteon  (Phoridae)  pupae.  Caenocholax  fenyesi  males 
were  found  between  October  3  and  20,  2003,  with  additional  specimens  collected 
between  December  19,  2003,  and  January  2,  2004. 

We  found  only  15  C.  fenyesi  males  from  the  approximately  12,000  S.  invicta 
workers.  Supposing  the  males  emerged  from  different  workers  as  is  typical  for  this 
species  (Cook  1996),  the  parasitism  rate  from  these  colonies  was  less  than  0.2  per- 
cent. However,  this  may  be  an  underestimation  because  stylopized  ants  lose  their 
social  instincts  and  abandon  the  nest  (Ogloblin  1939,  Cook  1996). 

The  strepsipterans  were  morphologically  identified  in  the  laboratory  at  Sam 
Houston  State  University.  Three  male  C.  fenyesi  from  this  collection  are  deposited 
in  the  entomology  collection  at  Sam  Houston  State  University.  The  other  individu- 
als were  kept  at  the  SABCL  collection. 

In  addition,  a  survey  was  conducted  to  search  for  C.  fenyesi  females  in  late 
November  and  early  December  2003  in  both  areas  where  the  S.  invicta  colonies 
were  found  parasitized.  A  total  of  2 1 7  orthopterans  were  collected  and  examined, 
but  none  were  parasitized  by  C.  fenyesi.  Collecting  methods  were  light  trapping 
(three  hours  each  day  and  for  three  days),  sweeping  (during  30  minutes),  and  pit- 
fall trapping  (40  vials  were  put  every  10  m  for  two  days).  In  Herradura,  154  orthop- 
terans (70  Grillidae,  77  Acrididae,  and  7  Gryllotalpidae)  were  collected  in  the  light 
traps  and  8  Grillidae  in  the  pitfall  traps  (2  of  them  were  parasitized  with  dipteran 
parasites).  In  Corrientes,  35  orthopterans  were  collected  from  sweeping  ( 1  of  them 
parasitized  by  a  nematode). 

DISCUSSION 

The  lack  of  information  on  host  associations  in  the  Myrmecolacidae  is  common, 
and  in  the  case  of  C.  fenyesi  has  led  to  several  speculations  about  its  host  relation- 
ships. Cook  (1996)  speculated  that  C.  fenyesi  most  likely  did  not  move  with  its  host 
from  S.  invicta  s  introduction  into  Mobile,  Alabama,  around  1918  (Creighton  1930) 
to  Texas  by  its  discovery  in  1988  (reported  by  Kathirithamby  and  Johnston  1992). 
This  move  would  have  required  a  simultaneous  move  of  both  sexes,  which  occur 
in  different  hosts,  or  by  the  first  larval  instar.  The  dispersal  stage  is  the  first  instar 


64  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


larva,  which  must  find  and  infect  its  host.  It  is  unlikely  that  a  50u  larva,  which 
moves  by  walking  legs  and  sometimes  jumping  with  its  caudal  appendage,  will  dis- 
perse very  far  in  any  given  generation  (Cook  et  al.  1998).  Although  dispersal  may 
also  be  mediated  by  a  host  female,  which  may  disperse  into  an  area  where  suitable 
hosts  for  both  strepsipteran  hosts  occurs. 

Kathirithamby  and  Hughes'  (2002)  discovery  ofC.fenyesi  using  C.  planatus  as 
a  host  led  them  to  speculate  that  it  may  be  the  original  host.  This  supposition  pres- 
ents two  problems,  how  S.  invicta  became  its  host  in  central  Texas  and  why 
C.  planatus  would  be  the  most  likely  original  host.  First,  if  C.  fenyesi  made  a  host 
switch  from  C.  planatus  to  S.  invicta,  there  is  a  logistical  problem.  Camponotus 
planatus  only  occurs  in  Texas  in  southern  counties  of  the  Rio  Grande  Valley,  and 
the  closest  it  has  been  reported  to  Brazos  County  (location  of  the  material  for  the 
original  host  association)  is  the  material  that  we  (JLC)  collected  in  San  Patricio 
County  and  separate  material  collected  by  William  P.  Mackay  from  Victoria 
County  (O'Keefe  et  al.  2000).  Solenopsis  invicta  did  not  invade  this  region  of 
Texas  until  the  mid-1970s  (Callcott  and  Collins  1996).  The  original  host  associa- 
tion that  Kathirithamby  and  Johnston  (1992)  described  was  from  specimens  col- 
lected in  1988.  While  it  is  not  impossible  that  C.  fenyesi  dispersed  this  far,  it  is 
unlikely  given  the  dual  host  association  of  this  strepsipteran  and  its  low  dispersal 
ability.  It  is  even  more  unlikely  that  C.  planatus  is  the  source  of  C.  fenyesi  collect- 
ed in  Louisiana  between  1964  and  1967  (Khalaf  1968),  in  Mississippi  in  1966 
(Khalaf  1969),  and  in  1960  from  Arizona  (Johnson  and  Morrison  1979).  The  pres- 
ence of  C.  fenyesi  in  Arizona  is  most  problematic  to  support  the  speculation  of 
Kathirithamby  and  Hughes  because  neither  C.  planatus  nor  S.  invicta  are  known  to 
occur  in  Arizona.  The  second  problem  of  what  ant  species  is  the  original  host  of 
C.  fenyesi  is  becoming  more  difficult  to  determine  with  the  discovery  of  different 
host  associations.  The  host  record  of  C  planatus  from  the  type  locality  of  C.  fenye- 
si does  not  necessarily  suggest  that  it  is  the  original  host,  but  only  documents  that 
this  could  be  the  host  of  the  type  population.  More  recently,  D.  bispinosus  has  also 
been  recorded  from  this  region  in  Mexico,  making  even  that  assumption  unclear. 

The  discovery  of  C.  fenyesi  utilizing  S.  invicta  as  a  host  in  its  native  Argentina 
makes  it  an  additional  candidate  as  a  primary  host.  The  recent  discovery  of  S.  invic- 
ta in  northwestern  Argentina  (Calcaterra  et  al.  unpublished  data),  where  males  of 
C.  fenyesi  were  also  collected  (Kathirithamby  and  Hughes  2002),  could  support 
this  idea.  All  of  these  host  ants  are  being  parasitized  in  their  natural  habitats,  as 
well  as  S.  invicta  being  parasitized  in  its  invaded  territory  of  the  United  States. 
None  of  these  ant  species  are  found  throughout  the  range  of  C.  fenyesi,  so  there  is 
a  problem  with  designating  any  of  them  as  an  "original  host,"  at  least  from  the  evi- 
dence that  we  now  have.  Other  likely  candidates  could  be  other  fire  ants  with  wide 
distributions,  such  as  Solenopsis  xyloni  McCook  or  Solenopsis  geminata  Fabricius, 
however,  there  is  no  concrete  evidence  that  either  is  even  a  host.  The  only  evidence 
for  this  assumption  is  that  their  distributions  coincide  in  part  with  that  of  C.  fenye- 
si; they  are  closely  related  to  one  known  host,  S.  invicta;  and  Ogloblin's  (1939)  dis- 
covery of  a  specimen  of  what  he  identified  as  S.  s.  pylades  Forel  parasitized  by  a 
myrmecolacid  that  he  did  not  identify.  Solenopsis  saevissima  pylades  is  now  a  syn- 
onym of  S.  xyloni  (Trager  1991).  However,  the  identity  of  this  Solenopsis  species 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 65_ 

needs  confirmation  because  S.  xyloni  is  not  thought  to  occur  in  South  America 
(Trager  1991,  Pitts  2002).  The  host  found  in  Misiones  by  Ogloblin  could  be 
S.  invicta,  S.  richteri,  or  S.  macdonaghi.  Solenopsis  invicta  is  the  most  abundant  of 
these  species  in  this  area. 

One  conclusion  that  can  now  be  garnered  from  the  data  we  have  is  that  male  C. 
fenyesi  is  a  generalist  parasite  of  ants.  If  all  of  these  strepsipteran  specimens  belong 
to  the  same  species,  C.  fenyesi,  then  it  certainly  is  not  host  specific.  Males  of  C. 
fenyesi  are  currently  associated  with  three  species  of  ants  that  are  not  even  in  the 
same  subfamily  (S.  invicta  is  in  the  subfamily  Myrmicinae,  D.  bispinosus  in  Doli- 
choderinae,  and  C.  planatus  in  Formicinae).  The  female  would  also  be  a  generalist 
with  our  current  associations.  One  host  of  the  female  C.  fenyesi  has  been  identified 
by  Kathirithamby  and  Johnston  (2003)  as  the  cricket  Macroanaxipha  macilenta 
(Saussure).  Prior  to  this,  Kathirithamby  and  Hughes  (2002)  synonymized  Myrme- 
colax  ogloblini  Luna  de  Carvalho  under  C.  fenyesi,  which  would  be  an  additional 
host  for  the  female.  Myrmecolax  ogloblini  was  described  from  material  Ogloblin 
had  collected  and  called  Mantidoxenos  argentinum.  The  hosts  of  this  species  are 
Camponotus  punctulatus  cruentatus  Forel  for  the  male  and  Acanthiotespis  macu- 
laus  (Saussure)  for  the  female  (Luna  de  Carvalho  1973).  Acanthiotespis  maculatus 
is  in  the  order  Mantodea.  If  this  synonymy  is  correct  it  would  mean  that  the  female 
is  utilizing  hosts  in  at  least  two  separate  orders,  Mantodea  and  Orthoptera. 

An  alternate  conclusion  may  be  that  there  are  cryptic  species  that  are  all  mor- 
phologically similar  to  C.  fenyesi.  In  this  scenario,  different  host  species  may  have 
different  strepsipteran  parasites.  In  the  light  of  Kathirithamby  and  Johnston's 
(2002)  genetic  analysis,  this  may  be  more  logical.  Molecular  approaches  and  host 
specificity  tests  are  needed  to  clarify  this  subject. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  Sanford  Porter  (USDA-ARS-Center  for  Medical,  Agricultural,  and  Veterinary  Ento- 
mology) and  Juan  Briano  (USDA-ARS-South  American  Biological  Control  Laboratory)  for  reviewing 
the  manuscript. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Banks,  W.  A.,  C.  L.  Lofgren,  D.  P.  Jouvenaz,  C.  E.  Stringer,  P.  M.  Bishop,  D.  F.  Williams,  D.  P. 
Wojcik,  and  B.  M.  Clancy.  1981.  Techniques  for  collecting,  rearing,  and  handling  red  imported 
fire  ants.  United  States  Department  of  Agriculture,  Advances  in  Agricultural  Technology,  Southern 
Series  21:  1-9. 

Cabrera,  A.  L.  and  A.  Willink.  1980.  Biogeografia  de  America  Latina.  OEA,  Serie  Biologica  13. 
Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  U.S.A.  122  pp. 

Callcott,  M.  A.  and  H.  L.  Collins.  1996.  Invasion  and  range  expansion  of  imported  fire  ants  (Hyme- 
noptera:  Formicidae)  in  North  America  from  1918-1995.  Florida  Entomologist  79:  240-251. 

Cook,  J.  L.  1996.  A  study  of  the  relationship  between  Cacnncholax  fcnvcsi  Pierce  (Strepsiptera. 
Myrmecolacidae)  and  the  red  imported  fire  ant.  Soh-nopsis  invicta  Buren  (Hymenoptera,  Formi- 
cidae). Ph.D.  Dissertation  (Entomology)  Texas  A&M  University,  College  Station,  Texas,  U.S.A.  172 
pp. 

Cook,  J.  L.,  J.  S.  Johnston,  R.  E.  Gold,  and  S.  B.  Vinson.  1997.  Distribution  of  Caenocholax  fenve- 
si  (Strepsiptera:  Myrmecolacidae)  and  the  habitats  most  likely  to  contain  its  stylopized  host, 
Solenopsis  invicta  (Hymenoptera:  Formicidae).  Environmental  Entomology  26:  1258-1262. 


66  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Cook,  J.  L.,  S.  B.  Vinson,  and  R.  E.  Gold.  1998.  Developmental  stages  of  Caenocholax  fenyesi  Pierce 
(Strepsiptera:  Myrmecolacidae):  descriptions  and  significance  to  the  higher  taxonomy  of  Strepsiptera. 
International  Journal  of  Insect  Morphology  and  Embryology  27:  21-26. 

Creighton,  W.  S.  1930.  The  new  world  species  of  the  genus  Solenopsis  (Hymenoptera:  Formicidae). 
Proceedings  of  the  American  Academy  of  Arts  and  Science  66:  39-151. 

Hofeneder,  K.    1949.  Uber  einige  Strepsipteren.  Broteria  18:  109-122,  145-166. 

Hughes,  D.  P.,  G.  Moya-Raygoza,  and  J.  Kathirithamby.  2003.  The  first  record  among  Dolicho- 
derinae  (Formicidae)  of  parasitism  by  Strepsiptera.  Insectes  Sociaux  50:  148-150. 

Johnson,  V.  and  W.  P.  Morrison.  1979.  New  North  American  distribution  records  for  four  species  of 
Strepsiptera.  Entomological  News  90:  251-255. 

Kathirithamby,  J.   1989.  Review  of  the  order  Strepsiptera.  Systematic  Entomology  14:  41-92. 

Kathirithamby,  J.  1991.  Stichotrema  robertsoni  spec.  n.  (Strepsiptera:  Myrmecolacidae):  the  first  report 
of  stylopisation  in  minor  workers  of  an  ant  (Pheidole  sp.:  Hymenoptera:  Formicidae).  Journal  of  the 
Entomological  Society  of  South  Africa  54:  9-15. 

Kathirithamby,  J.  and  W.  D.  Hamilton.  1992.  More  covert  sex:  the  elusive  females  of  Myrmeco- 
lacidae. Trends  in  Ecology  and  Evolution  7:  349-351. 

Kathirithamby,  J.  and  D.  P.  Hughes.  2002.  Caenocholax  fenyesi  (Strepsiptera:  Myrmecolacidae)  para- 
sitic in  Camponotus  planatus  (Hymenoptera:  Formicidae)  in  Mexico:  Is  this  the  original  host?  Annals 
of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  95:  558-563. 

Kathirithamby,  J.  and  J.  S.  Johnston.  1992.  Stylopization  of  Solenopsis  invicta  (Hymenoptera: 
Formicidae)  by  Caenocholax  fenyesi  (Strepsiptera:  Myrmecolacidae)  in  Texas.  Annals  of  the 
Entomological  Society  of  America  85:  293-297. 

Kathirithamby,  J.  and  J.  S.  Johnston.  2003.  The  discovery  after  94  years  of  the  elusive  female  of  a 
myrmecolacid  (Strepsiptera),  and  the  cryptic  species  of  Caenocholax  fenyesi  Pierce  sensu  lato. 
Proceedings  of  the  Royal  Society  London,  B  (Suppl.),  Biological  Letters.  Published  online  17  Sept. 
2003.  (DOI  10.1098/rsbl.2003.0078). 

Khalaf,  K.  T.  1968.  The  seasonal  incidence  of  free  Strepsiptera  (Insecta)  males  in  southern  Louisiana. 
American  Midland  Naturalist  80:  565-568. 

Khalaf,  K.  T.   1969.  Strepsiptera  from  the  Mississippi  Coast.  Florida  Entomologist  52:  53. 

Luna  de  Carvalho,  E.  1972.  Quarta  contribuicao  para  o  estudo  dos  Estrepsipteros  angolenses  (Insecta 
Strepsiptera).  Publicacoes  Culturais  da  Companhia  de  Diamantes  da  Angola  (Lisbon)  84:  109-130. 

Luna  de  Carvalho,  E.  1973.  Estudo  sobre  o  " ' Mantidoxenos  argentinus"  (Myrmecolax  Ogloblin),  nom. 
nov.  (Insecta  Strepsiptera  Myrmecolacidae).  Ciencia  Biologica  (Portugal)  1:  51-56. 

Ogloblin,  A.  A.  1939.  The  Strepsiptera  parasites  of  ants.  International  Congress  of  Entomology,  Berlin 
19382:  1277-1284. 

O'Keefe,  S.  T.,  J.  L.  Cook,  T.  Dudek,  D.  F.  Wunneburger,  M.  D.  Guzman,  R.  N.  Coulson,  and  S.  B. 
Vinson.  2000.  The  distribution  of  Texas  Ants.  Southwestern  Entomologist  22  (Supplement):  1-92. 

Pierce,  W.  D.  1909.  A  monographic  revision  of  the  twisted  winged  insects  comprising  the  order 
Strepsiptera  Kirby.  Bulletin  of  the  U.  S.  National  Museum  66:  1-232. 

Pitts,  J.  P.  2002.  A  cladistic  analysis  of  Solenopsis  saevissima  species-group  (Hymenoptera: 
Formicidae).  Ph.D.  Dissertation  (Entomology).  University  of  Georgia.  Athens,  Georgia,  U.S.A.  266 
pp. 

Teson,  A.  and  A.  M.  M.  Remes  Lenicov.  1979.  Estrepsipteros  parasitoides  de  Himenopteros  (Insecta  - 
Strepsiptera).  Revista  de  la  Sociedad  Entomologica.  38:  1 15-122. 

Trager,  J.  C.  1991.  A  revision  of  the  fire  ants,  Solenopsis  geminata  group.  Journal  of  the  New  York 
Entomological  Society  99:  141-198. 

Westwood,  J.  O.  1861.  Notice  on  the  occurrence  of  a  strepsipterous  insect  parasitic  on  ants  discovered 
in  Ceylon  y  Herr  Niener.  Transactions  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  London  5:  418-420. 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 67_ 

THREE  NEW  SPECIES  OF  APOGONALIA 

FROM  THE  DOMINICAN  REPUBLIC 
(HOMOPTERA,  CICADELLIDAE,  CICADELLINAE)1 

Paul  H.  Freytag2 

ABSTRACT:  Three  new  species  of  Apogonalia  from  the  Dominican  Republic  are  described,  A. 
angusta,  A.  noda,  and  A.  loxa. 

KEY  WORDS:  Apogonalia,  new  species,  Homoptera,  Cicadellidae,  Cicadellinae,  Dominican 
Republic 

The  species  of  Apogonalia  that  occur  on  Hispaniola  were  reviewed  by  Young 
(1977).  At  that  time  four  species  were  known,  A.  histro  (Fabricius),  A.  interrup- 
ta  (Signoret),  A.  pinguis  Young  and  A.  robusta  (Walker).  Three  new  species  have 
now  been  found  and  are  described  here,  two  are  related  to  A.  pinguis  and  the 
other  is  not  closely  related  to  any  of  the  four  known  species. 


Apogonalia  angusta  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  1-5) 

Description:  Length  of  males  7.5  mm,  females  unknown.  Similar  to  A.  pinguis  in  general  ap- 
pearance, except  slightly  smaller,  and  more  slender.  General  color  pattern  similar  to  pinguis,  except 
with  a  dark  brown  spot,  bordered  by  yellow,  along  middle  of  costa  and  a  smaller  greenish  spot  at  base 
of  costa.  Male  genitalia:  Plates  (Fig.  1)  shorter  then  pygofer.  Pygofer  longer  than  wide,  with  slightly 
enlarged  rounded  apex.  Paraphysis  (Figs.  2  and  3)  with  two  processes  which  are  long,  diverging, 
slightly  enlarged  near  pointed  apex.  Aedeagus  (Figs.  4  and  5)  triangular  in  ventral  view,  with  bifur- 
cate, ventrally  projecting,  sharply  pointed  apex. 

Type  Data:  Holotype  male,  Dominican  Republic:  Azua,  East  side  of  crest.  Sierra  Martin  Garcia, 
7  km  WNW  Barrero,  18°  21'  N,  70°  58'  W,  860  m,  July  25-26,  1992,  C.  Young,  R.  Davidson, 
S.  Thompson  and  J.  Rawlins,  cloud  forest  adjacent  to  disturbed  forest.  Paratype  male,  same  data  as 
holotype.  Holotype  and  paratype  have  been  deposited  in  the  Carnegie  Museum  (Pittsburgh,  Penn- 
sylvania, U.S.A.). 

Notes:  This  species  is  closely  related  to  pinguis  and  can  be  separated  from  it 
by  being  smaller,  less  robust,  and  with  a  distinctly  different  aedeagus. 


Apogonalia  loxa  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  6- 10) 

Description:  Length  of  males  7.5-8.2  mm,  females  7.5-8.5  mm.  Similar  to  A.  pinguis  in  size  and 
coloration  of  head  and  thorax,  differing  on  front  wing  coloration  and  male  genitalia.  General  col- 
oration similar  to  pinguis  for  head  and  pronotum.  Front  wings  dark  brown  with  three  yellowish  spots. 


1  Received  on  June  3,  2004.  Accepted  on  June  I  S,  2004. 

'Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Kentucky,  Lexington,  Kentucky  40546  U.S.A.  E-mail: 
pfreytag(a  ix.netcom.com. 

Mailed  on  December  21,  2004 


68 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


one  spot  in  basal  third  of  wing,  one  larger  spot  from  end  of  clavus  to  the  costal  margin,  and  one  across 
apical  ends  of  subapical  cells.  Male  genitalia:  Plates  (Fig.  6)  slightly  over  half  length  of  pygofer. 
Pygofer  longer  than  wide,  evenly  rounded.  Paraphysis  (Figs.  7  and  8)  with  two  thin,  long,  slightly 
diverging  processes.  Aedeagus  similar  to  pinguis  except  lateral  spines  extending  ventrally. 

Type  Data:  Holotype  male,  Dominican  Republic:  Pedernales,  20  km.  N  Cabo  Rojo.  18°  07'  N, 
71°  39'  W,  1070  m,  July  23-24,  1990,  C.  Young,  J.  E.  Rawlins,  S.  Thompson.  Paratypes:  two  males 
and  three  females,  same  data  as  holotype.  Holotype  and  one  female  paratype  have  been  deposited  in 
the  Carnegie  Museum,  one  male  and  one  female  paratype  in  the  University  of  Kentucky  Collection 
(Lexington,  Kentucky,  U.S.A.),  one  male  paratype  in  the  Florida  Collection  of  Arthropods  (Gaines- 
ville, Florida,  U.S.A.),  and  one  female  paratype  in  the  National  Collection,  Santo  Domingo, 
Dominican  Republic. 


ANGUSTA 


Imm 


LOXA 


10 


Figures  1  -5  Apogonalia  angusta  n.  sp.  Fig.  1 ,  male  genital  capsule,  lateral  view.  Fig.  2, 
paraphysis,  lateral  view.  Fig.  3,  paraphysis,  ventral  view.  Fig.  4,  aedeagus,  ventral  view. 
Fig.  5,  aedeagus,  lateral  view.  Figures  6-10,  Apogonalia  loxa  n.  sp.  Fig.  6,  male  genital 
capsule,  lateral  view.  Fig.  7,  paraphysis,  lateral  view.  Fig.  8,  paraphysis,  ventral  view.  Fig. 
9,  aedeagus,  lateral  view.  Fig.  10,  aedeagus,  ventral  view.  All  drawn  to  same  scale. 


Vol.  115.  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004 69_ 

Notes:  This  species  is  quite  similar  \opinguis,  but  it  differs  by  being  darker  in 
color,  with  the  conspicuous  yellow  spots  and  the  aedeagus  having  the  lateral 
spines  extending  ventrally.  Other  specimens  seen  are  one  male  and  two  females 
from  the  same  area,  collected  July  20  or  31,  at  730  m.,  by  the  same  collectors,  in 
the  Carnegie  Museum. 


Apogonalia  noda  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  11-16) 

Description:  Length  of  males  7-7.5  mm.,  females  7-7.6  mm.  A  long,  narrow,  greenish  species 
with  reddish  front  wings.  General  coloration  greenish  yellow  with  dark  brown  pattern,  and  reddish 
under  the  front  wings.  Head  and  pronotum  (Fig.  11)  patterned  with  four  evenly  spaced  dark  spots 
across  margin,  two  spots  near  ocelli,  two  near  hind  margin  of  head,  and  three  irregular  lines  on  each 
side  of  pronotum.  Front  wings  with  most  longitudinal  veins  dark  brown,  patch  of  pink  at  base  of 
wing,  with  underneath  red.  Dorsal  surface  of  abdomen  red,  ventral  surface  reddish  or  dark  brown. 
Male  genitalia:  Plates  (Fig.  14)  as  long  as  pygofer.  Pygofer  long  and  truncate.  Paraphysis  (figs.  12 
and  13)  with  two  long  thin  parallel  processes  which  diverge  near  apex.  Aedeagus  (Figs.  15  and  16) 
short  with  shaft  simple,  tubular,  curving  dorsad,  gonopore  near  base. 

Type  Data:  Holotype  male,  Dominican  Republic:  Hato  Mayor,  Parque  Los  Haitises,  near  Cueva 
de  Arena,  19  04'  N  69°  28'  W,  10  m.,  July  7-9,  1992,  C.  Young,  R.  Davidson,  S.  Thompson  and 
J.  Rawlins,  costal  vegetation  on  limestone.  Paratypes:  one  male  and  two  females,  same  data  as  holo- 
type.  Holotype  and  one  female  paratype  in  the  Carnegie  Museum,  one  male  paratype  in  the  Univer- 
sity of  Kentucky  Collection  and  one  female  paratype  in  the  Florida  Collection  of  Arthropods. 

Notes:  This  species  can  be  distinguished  from  all  other  species  of  Apogonalia 
known  from  Hispaniola  by  its  evenly  spaced  spots  on  the  margin  of  the  head,  or 
the  unusual  male  aedeagus.  Other  specimens  seen  are  one  male  and  two  females 
from  Pedernales,  from  540  to  730  m.,  23-26  km.  N  Cabo  Rojo,  July  20,  1990, 
and  two  males  from  Barahona,  near  Rio  Nizao,  July  or  August  1990,  all  collect- 
ed by  the  same  collectors,  in  the  Carnegie  Museum. 


70 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


13 


NODA 


Imm 


Figures  11-16  Apogonalia  noda  n.  sp.  Fig.  11,  head,  pronotum,  and  scutellum,  dorsal 
view.  Fig.  12,  paraphysis,  ventral  view.  Fig.  13,  paraphysis,  lateral  view.  Fig.  14,  male 
genital  capsule,  lateral  view.  Fig.  15,  aedeagus,  ventral  view.  Fig.  16,  aedeagus,  lateral 
view.  All  drawn  to  same  scale. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Young,  D.  A.  1977.  Taxonomic  study  of  the  Cicadellinae  (Homoptera:  Cicadellidae).  Part  2. 
New  World  Cicadellini  and  the  genus  Cicadella.  North  Carolina  Agricultural  Experiment  Station 
Bulletin  239.  1135pp. 


Vol.  1 1 5,  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 7J_ 

INTRODUCTION  OF  THE  MILLIPED,  CLEIDOGONA 

NANTAHALA  SHEAR,  IN  NEW  ENGLAND,  U.S.A. 
(DIPLOPODA,  CHORDEUMATIDA,  CLEIDOGONIDAE)1 

William  A.  Shear  and  Rowland  M.  Shelley3 

ABSTRACT:  The  milliped  Cleidogona  nantcthala  Shear,  1972,  is  recorded  from  the  New  England 
states  of  Connecticut  and  Rhode  Island,  around  700  mi  (1,120  km)  northeast  of  its  native  area  in 
western  North  Carolina.  This  is  the  third  record  of  a  species  of  Cleidogona  from  glaciated  territory 
in  eastern  North  America,  and  it  is  also  the  first  documented  case  of  a  native  diplopod's  being  trans- 
ported by  human  agency  to  another  part  of  the  continent  and  becoming  established  there.  The  species 
is  believed  to  have  been  transported  to  New  England  after  1950  in  association  with  rhododendrons 
and  other  Appalachian  plants,  and  with  50  mi  (80  km)  between  the  Rhode  Island  and  Connecticut 
sites,  two  introductions  may  have  occurred. 

KEY  WORDS:  Cleidogena  nantahala,  New  England,  U.S.A.,  Diplopoda,  Chordeumatida,  Clei- 
dogonidae 

The  milliped  fauna  of  the  northeastern  United  States  and  eastern  Canada  is 
depauperate  compared  to  that  farther  south  (Shelley  1988).  As  an  arbirtrary 
southern  limit,  if  one  extends  the  Mason-Dixon  line  (the  boundary  between 
Pennsylvania  and  Maryland)  and  the  Ohio  river  through  central  Indiana  and  Illi- 
nois, only  61  species  of  Diplopoda  occur  to  the  north  (based  on  entries  in  Hoff- 
man (1999a),  20  of  which  are  known  or  suspected  to  be  native  European  species 
that  were  introduced  into  North  America  through  human  agency.  Forty-six  of  the 
61  species,  including  all  20  aliens,  inhabit  formerly  glaciated  territory,  so  only  26 
indigenous  millipeds  have  invaded  this  area  from  refugia  to  the  south  (Shelley 
2002a).  Only  one  species,  Conotyla  fischeri  Cook  and  Collins,  1895  (Chordeu- 
matida: Conotylidae),  appears  to  be  endemic  to  glaciated  regions,  as  it  is  known 
only  from  northern  and  western  New  York,  where  it  ranges  from  Lake  Ontario 
and  the  St.  Lawrence  River  to  the  Adirondacks  and  the  Finger  Lakes  area  (Shear 
1971,  Shelley  1988,  Hoffman  1999a). 

Our  knowledge  of  milliped  distributions  in  North  America,  even  in  an  area  as 
well  collected  as  this  glaciated  northeastern  region,  is  still  incomplete.  However, 
no  new  taxa  have  been  discovered  there  since  the  description  of  Okeanobates 
americanus  Enghoff,  1979  (Julida:  Okeanobatidae).  Prior  to  this,  the  last  ones 
were  Aniuhts  paludicolens  Causey,  1967,  Uroblaniulus  stolidus  Causey,  1953, 
and  U.  jerseyi  (Causey,  1950),  all  representatives  of  the  Parajulidae  (Julida). 
Shelley  (2001)  considered  A  paludicolens  to  be  a  valid  species,  but  the  last  two 
are  of  dubious  validity  and  await  a  generic  revision.  Therefore,  the  discovery  of 
an  unreported,  indigenous  milliped  from  the  northeast  is  of  considerable  interest. 


'  Received  on  March  24,  2004.  Accepted  on  July  13,  2004. 

;  Biology  Department,  Hampden-Sydney  College,  Hampden-Sydney,  Virginia  23943  U.S.A.  E-mail: 
wshear(o,ihsc.edu. 

1  Research  Lab.,  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  4301  Reedy  Creek  Rd.,  Raleigh, 
North  Carolina  27607  U.S.A.  E-mail:  rowland.shelleyta  ncmail.net. 

Mailed  on  December  21,  2004 


72  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


While  examining  the  milliped  collection  from  the  Peabody  Museum  of  Natu- 
ral History,  Yale  University,  New  Haven,  Connecticut  (PMNH),  one  of  us  (RMS) 
discovered  samples  of  a  species  of  Cleidogona  (Chordeumatida,  Cleidogonidae) 
from  Connecticut  and  Rhode  Island.  Initially,  we  thought  the  specimens  repre- 
sented an  undescribed,  endemic  species  because  they  did  not  conform  to  the  two 
most  northern  representatives  along  the  Atlantic  Coast,  C.  caesioannulata 
(Wood,  1865)  and  C.  major  (Cook  &  Collins,  1895).  Some  of  these  specimens 
were  mentioned  by  Hoffman  ( \999a,  b),  who  suggested  that  they  were  C.  major, 
but  the  northernmost  locality  of  this  species  is  Washington,  DC  (Shear  1972), 
some  300  mi  (480  km)  southeast  of  the  Connecticut  sites.  Cleidogona  caesioan- 
nulata has  been  collected  as  far  north  as  Stroudsburg,  Monroe  County,  Pennsyl- 
vania (see  Shear  (1972:225,  map  12),  and  would  thus  be  the  most  plausible  can- 
didate among  the  established  species  to  occur  in  New  England.  However,  when 
the  specimens  were  dissected  and  the  gonopods  and  cyphopods  compared  to 
those  of  described  species,  the  millipeds  turned  out  to  be  C.  nantahala  Shear, 
1972,  which  occurs  some  700  mi  (1,120  km)  to  the  southwest  in  western  North 
Carolina  and  potentially  also  north  Georgia  (Shear  1972,  Shelley  2000a).  The 
identity  was  established  through  side-by-side  comparisons  with  authentic  North 
Carolina  specimens.  We  present  here  the  New  England  records,  illustrations  of 
the  gonopods  (figs.  1-3)  and  cyphopods  (fig.  4)  to  facilitate  future  identifications 
of  this  species  in  the  Northeast,  remarks  on  northern  representatives  of  Cleido- 
gona, and  a  likely  explanation  of  how  C.  nantahala  reached  this  area. 


Cleidogona  nantahala  Shear,  1972 

(Figs.  1-4) 

Cleidogona  nantahala  Shear  1972:227.  Hoffman,  1999a:221.  Shelley,  2000a:187. 

Diagnosis:  Gonopods  apically  divided,  with  narrow,  curvilinear,  apically  sub- 
acuminate  inner  branch  (ib)  extending  beyond  distal  extremity  of  laminate  outer 
branch  (ob);  colpocoxite  (c)  apically  divided  (Figs.  1-3).  Cyphopods  with  post- 
genital  plate  (pgp)  distally  expanded  (Fig.  4). 

New  England  Records  (All  specimens  housed  at  the  PMNH):  CONNECTICUT:  New  Haven 
Co.,  West  Rock,  cf,  9,  March  22,  1964,  B.  Vogel.  Middlesex  Co.,  Hurd  State  Park,  beside  Connecti- 
cut River,  Cf,  March  26,  1961,  C.  L.  Remington.  RHODE  ISLAND:  Washington  Co.,  Wood  River 
crossing,  Nooseneck  Hill  Road,  under  log,  9-  June  2,  2003,  J.  E.  O'Donnell,  R.  J.  Pupedis. 

Remarks:  Cleidogona  nantahala  belongs  to  the  "Major  species  group" 
which  ranges  from  Georgia  to  Washington,  DC,  but  there  is  a  considerable  gap 
between  the  northernmost  record,  C.  major  at  Washington,  DC,  and  the  New 
England  localities.  The  northernmost  generic  record  along  the  east  coast  is  the 
aforementioned  one  of  C.  caesioannulata  (a  member  of  the  "Caesioannulata 
species  group")  from  Stroudsburg,  Pennsylvania,  some  110  mi  (176  km)  south- 
west of  the  New  England  localities.  We  believe  this  site  represents  the  northern 
generic  range  limit  along  the  east  coast  because  no  Cleidogona  has  been  found 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 73_ 

to  the  north  despite  years  of  reasonably  thorough  diplopod  sampling.  Cleidogona 
caesioannulata  has  the  widest  distribution  of  any  species,  ranging  from 
Stroudsburg  westward  and  northward  through  Wayne  County,  Ohio,  to  Mason 
County,  Michigan,  on  Lake  Michigan  about  2/3  of  the  distance  northward  on  the 
Lower  Peninsula  at  the  level  of  the  "thumb,"  and  southward  to  North  Carolina, 
where  it  occurs  in  all  physiographic  provinces  and  spans  the  state  from  the 
Coastal  Plain  (Beaufort  County)  to  the  Blue  Ridge  Mountains  (Mt.  Mitchell, 
Yancey  County)4  (Johnson  1954;  Shear  1972;  Shelley  1978,  2000a;  Kevan  1983; 
Snider  1991).  It  is  plausible  that  C.  caesioannulata  adapted  to  colder  climatic 
conditions  during  glacial  maxima  and  spread  northward  following  glacial  retreat; 
it  may  also  have  occurred  farther  north  between  glacial  advances,  such  that  the 
present  distribution  represents  a  truncation  of  a  once  wider  and  more  northerly 
one.  Whatever  the  explanation,  species  of  Cleidogona  are  almost  always  associ- 
ated with  deciduous  forest  and  probably  could  not  have  survived  in  periglacial 
tundra  or  taiga.  It  is  germane  to  note  here  that  unidentifiable  females  and  juve- 
niles of  Cleidogona  have  been  found  in  Middlesex  and  Essex  counties,  Ontario, 
the  latter  being  the  southernmost  county  in  Canada  and  directly  across  the 
Detroit  River  from  Detroit  (Judd  1967;  Kevan  1983;  Shelley  1988,  20020). 
Kevan  (1983)  and  Shelley  ( 1988,  2002a)  believed  that  the  individuals  represent 
an  undescribed  species,  as  the  postgenital  plate  of  a  female  from  Essex  County, 
which  is  divided  into  two  long,  broad,  apically  truncated  arms  (see  Shelley  1988, 
fig.  24),  is  unlike  that  of  any  species  Shear  (1972)  reported,  particularly  C.  cae- 
sioannulata or  another  "northern"  species  in  the  United  States.  Snider  (1991) 
reported  C.  caesioannulata  from  1 1  counties  in  Michigan,  including  St.  Clair,  so 
this  species  should  be  expected  around  Sarnia,  Lambton  County,  Ontario,  which 
is  directly  across  the  St.  Clair  River.  Consequently,  Cleidogona  can  be  reason- 
ably expected  in  Ontario  from  the  latitudes  of  Sarnia  and  London  southward  (in 
Lambton,  Middlesex,  Elgin,  Kent,  and  Essex  counties),  and  two  species  can  be 
anticipated,  C.  caesioannulata  and  the  potential  new  one  with  the  divided  post- 
genital  plate  in  females. 

The  New   England  specimens  of  C.   nantahala   are  the  third  record  of 
Cleidogona  from  formerly  glaciated  territory,  the  others  being  the  aforemen- 


4  Hoffman  (1999/?)  suggested  that  Jiilus  pitnctatus  Say  1821,  under  the  replacement  name  and  new 
combination  Cleidogona  sayanum  (Bollman,  1893),  is  a  senior  synonym  of  either  C.  caesioannula- 
ta  or  C'.  major.  The  types  of  J.  punctatus  no  longer  exist,  and  Say  did  not  provide  any  locality  infor- 
mation in  his  description;  however,  circumstantial  evidence  adduced  by  Hoffman  suggests  that  the 
specimen(s)  were  most  likely  collected  around  Philadelphia,  in  eastern  Pennsylvania.  Hoffman 
(1999/7)  had  no  specimens,  but  if  C.  caesioannulata  is  discovered  near  this  city  and  a  specimen  is 
designated  as  the  neotype  of  J.  punctatus.  C.  caesioannulata  will  fall  as  a  junior  synonym  of  C. 
sayanum  despite  the  fact  that  the  latter  name  has  not  been  used  in  the  primary  literature  since  its  pro- 
posal in  1893.  We  are  not  prepared  to  accept  this  action  and  discourage  others  from  doing  so  as  it 
would  replace  the  oldest  current  name  in  the  genus  (though  not  the  type  species)  and,  because  of  its 
wide  distibution,  the  one  most  likely  to  be  cited  by  researchers  who  are  not  systematists.  For  geo- 
graphical reasons,  it  is  unlikely  that  C.  major  is  a  synonym  of  C".  sayanum  because  it  is  unknown 
north  of  Washington,  DC,  and  such  a  synonymy  would  be  equally  disruptive  because  C.  major  is 
the  type  species  of  Cleidogona. 


74  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


tioned  ones  of  C.  caesioannulata  from  Michigan  and  north  central  Ohio  (Johnson 
1954,  Shear  1972,  Kevan  1983,  Snider  1991)  and  the  potential  new  species  from 
southern  Ontario.  They  are  so  disjunct  from  C.  nantahala  s  home  range,  in  west- 
ern North  Carolina  from  Mitchell  to  Macon  counties  and,  based  on  females, 
probably  extending  to  Pickens  County,  Georgia  (Shear  1972,  Shelley  2000a), 
that  the  only  plausible  explanation  for  their  New  England  occurrences  is  human 
introduction.  For  over  200  years,  New  England  nurserymen  have  imported  plants 
from  the  southern  Appalachians,  where  a  thriving  cottage  industry  in  the  collec- 
tion of  native  plants  still  exists;  it  thus  seems  likely  that  individuals  of  C.  nanta- 
hala were  transported  to  New  England  in  soil  of  rhododendrons  or  other  native 
plants.  The  time  of  the  introduction  is  unknown,  but  southern  New  England  is 
perhaps  the  best-known  region  of  the  continent  as  far  as  its  total  fauna  is  con- 
cerned because  it  has  been  a  center  for  natural  historians  since  colonial  days. 
However,  the  earliest  collection  of  C  nantahala  was  only  43  years  ago,  in  1961, 
by  C.  L.  Remington,  an  assiduous  arthropod  collector  who  was  actively  sampling 
in  southern  New  England  for  many  prior  years.  Beatrice  Vogel,  who  collected  the 
species  in  1 964,  was  a  Yale  graduate  student  studying  wolf  spider  systematics 
who  also  sampled  frequently  in  the  area.  As  no  specimens  are  available  earlier 
than  this,  it  is  reasonable  to  conclude  that  the  introduction  probably  occurred 
after  1950.  We  do  not  know  the  circumstances  of  either  find,  but  the  1961  col- 
lection was  in  a  state  park,  suggesting  that  it  was  not  disturbed  habitat  or  a  place 
where  southern  Appalachian  plants  had  been  cultivated.  The  Rhode  Island  col- 
lection also  was  not  from  a  cultivated  spot,  and  the  distance  from  the  Connecticut 
sites,  ca.  50  mi  (80  km),  suggests  that  more  than  one  introduction  may  be 
involved. 

To  our  knowledge,  Cleidogona  nantahala  is  the  first  native  North  American 
milliped  to  be  successfully  introduced  to  another  region  of  the  continent,  and  we 
also  believe  it  to  be  the  first  one  introduced  anywhere.  Since  the  late  1980s,  three 
North  American  scorpions  -  Centruroides  vittatus  (Say),  C.  hentzi  (Banks),  and 
Vaejovis  carolinianus  (Beauvois)  -  have  been  encountered  with  increasing  fre- 
quencies in  southeastern  states  well  outside  their  normal  ranges  (Shelley  19940, 
b;  Shelley  and  Sissom  1995),  and  while  there  is  no  definite  evidence  that  repro- 
ducing populations  have  become  established,  the  increasing  frequency  with 
which  individuals  are  being  encountered  in  homes,  office  buildings,  yards,  and 
casually  wandering  along  city  sidewalks  suggests  that  this  is  just  a  matter  of 
time.  However,  as  often  as  plants  and  soil  have  been  transported  from  one  region 
of  the  country  to  another,  no  native  millipeds  have  ever  been  encountered  outside 
their  home  areas  until  this  discovery  of  C.  nantahala.  According  to  the  list  of 
species  in  Hoffman  (19990)  and  recent  references  (Shelley  and  Golovatch  2001; 
Shelley  and  Edwards  2001,  2002;  Shelley  2004),  35  exogenous  millipeds  of 
European,  Asian,  Australian,  and  Neotropical  origins  have  been  introduced  into 
North  America  and  are  now  established  here,  primarily  in  urban  environments; 
this  figure  does  not  include  species  intercepted  during  quarantines  at  ports.  Asian 


Vol.  115.  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004 


75 


and  European  millipeds  have  been  widely  introduced  into  islands  throughout  the 
world,  but  this  has  not  happened  with  any  North  America  species,  not  even  in 
Hawaii,  where  the  North  American  centipede,  Scolopendra  polymorpha  Wood, 
occurring  from  the  Central  Plains  westward  (Shelley  20026),  was  recorded  from 
a  pineapple  field  in  Oahu  by  Shelley  (20006).  The  question  therefore  arises  as  to 
why  this  particular  milliped  species  has  been  able  to  establish  itself  in  New 
England  and,  once  there,  perhaps  gradually  spread  and  increase  its  range.  Over  a 
half-dozen  species  of  Cleidogona  also  occur  in  western  North  Carolina;  some  of 
which  are  partly  sympatric  with  C.  nantahala  and  could  potentially  be  introduced 
along  with  the  latter,  but  this  has  not  happened.  Apparently  there  is  an  aspect  of 
the  ecophysiology  of  C.  nantahala  that  makes  it  unique  among  cleidogonids  as 
a  colonizer. 


Figs.  1-4  Cleidogona  nantahala.  1,  gonopods  of  male  from  Hurd  State  Park,  Connecti- 
cut, anterior  view.  2,  left  gonopod  of  the  same,  lateral  view.  3,  tip  of  left  gonopod  of  male 
from  West  Rock,  lateral  view.  4,  cyphopods  of  female  from  West  Rock,  posterior  view. 
c,  colpocoxite;  ib,  inner  branch;  ob,  outer  branch;  pgp,  postgenital  plate. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  R.  J.  Pupedis  for  loan  of  the  PMNH  diplopod  collection,  and  R.  L.  Hoffman  for  a  pre- 
submission  review. 


76  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Causey,  N.  B.  1950.  New  genera  and  species  of  millipeds — Parajulidae  (Juloidea).  Proceedings  of 
the  Arkansas  Academy  of  Sciences  3:45-58. 

Causey,  N.  B.  1953.  On  five  new  North  American  millipeds  and  records  of  some  established 
species.  American  Midland  Naturalist  50:152-158. 

Causey,  N.  B.  1967.  Aniulus  paludicolens,  n.  sp.,  (Julida:  Parajulidae),  a  bog-dwelling  milliped. 
Michigan  Entomologist  1:127-129. 

Cook,  O.  F.  and  G.  N.  Collins.  1895.  The  Craspedosomatidae  of  North  America.  Annals  of  the 
New  York  Academy  of  Sciences  9:1-1 00. 

Enghoff,  H.  1979.  The  milliped  genus  Okeanobates  (Diplopoda:  Julida:  Nemasomatidae).  Steen- 
strupia  5:161-178. 

Hoffman,  R.  L.  1999a.  Checklist  of  the  millipeds  of  North  and  Middle  America.  Virginia  Museum 
of  Natural  History  Special  Publications  Number  8.  584  pp. 

Hoffman,  R.  L.  1999/1.  The  status  of  Juhts  punctatus  Say,  1821  (Chordeumatida:  Cleidogonidae). 
Myriapodologica  6:23-26. 

Johnson,  B.  M.  1 954.  The  millipeds  of  Michigan.  Papers  of  the  Michigan  Academy  of  Science,  Arts, 
and  Letters  39:24 1-252. 

Judd,  W.  W.  1967.  Millipeds  (Diplopoda)  in  the  vicinity  of  London,  Ontario.  Canadian  Field 
Naturalist  81: 189- 196. 

Kevan,  D.  K.  McE.  1983.  A  preliminary  survey  of  known  and  potentially  Canadian  millipedes 
(Diplopoda).  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  61:2956-2975. 

Shear,  W.  A.  1971.  Ataxonomic  revision  of  the  milliped  family  Conotylidae  in  North  America,  with 
a  description  of  the  new  family  Adritylidae  (Diplopoda:  Chordeumida).  Bulletin  of  the  Museum 
of  Comparative  Zoology  141:55-96. 

Shear,  W.  A.  1972.  Studies  in  the  milliped  order  Chordeumida  (Diplopoda):  a  revision  of  the  fam- 
ily Cleidogonidae  and  a  reclassification  of  the  order  Chordeumida  in  the  New  World.  Bulletin  of 
the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology  144:151-352. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1978.  Millipeds  of  the  eastern  Piedmont  region  of  North  Carolina,  U.S.A. 
(Diplopoda).  Journal  of  Natural  History  12:37-79. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1988.  The  millipeds  of  eastern  Canada  (Arthropoda:  Diplopoda).  Canadian  Journal 
of  Zoology  66: 1638- 1663. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1994a.  Introductions  of  the  scorpions,  Centmmides  vittatus  (Say)  and  C.  hentzi 
(Banks),  into  North  Carolina,  with  records  of  the  indigenous  scorpion,  Vaejovis  carolinianus 
(Beauvois)  (Scorpionida:  Buthidae,  Vaejovidae).  Brimleyana  21:45-55. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1994b.  Distribution  of  the  scorpion,  Vaejovis  carolinianus  (Beauvois)  -  a  reevalua- 
tion  (Arachnida:  Scorpionida:  Vaejovidae).  Brimleyana  21:57-68. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2000a.  Annotated  checklist  of  the  millipeds  of  North  Carolina  (Arthropoda:  Diplo- 
poda), with  remarks  on  the  genus  Sigmoria  Chamberlin  (Polydesmida:  Xystodesmidae).  Journal 
of  the  Elisha  Mitchell  Scientific  Society  11 6(3):  177-205. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2000b.  The  centipede  order  Scolopendromorpha  in  the  Hawaiian  Islands  (Chilo- 
poda).  Bishop  Museum  Occasional  Papers  No.  64:39-48. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2001.  A  synopsis  of  the  milliped  genus  Aniulus  Chamberlin  (Julida:  Parajulidae: 
Parajulinae:  Aniulini).  Texas  Memorial  Museum  Speleological  Monographs  5:73-94. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2002a.  The  millipeds  of  central  Canada  (Arthropoda:  Diplopoda),  with  reviews  of 
the  Canadian  fauna  and  diplopod  faunistic  studies.  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  80:1863-1875. 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 77 


Shelley,  R.  M.  2002b.  A  synopsis  of  the  North  American  centipedes  of  the  order  Scolopendro- 
morpha  (Chilopoda).  Virginia  Museum  of  Natural  History  Memoir  5: 1-108. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2004.  The  milliped  family  Pyrgodesmidae  in  the  continental  USA,  with  the  first 
record  of  Poratia  digitata  (Porat)  from  the  Bahamas  (Diplopoda:  Polydesmida).  Journal  of 
Natural  History  38: 1 1 59- 1 1 8 1 . 

Shelley,  R.  M.  and  VV.  D.  Sissom.  1995.  Distributions  of  the  scorpions  Centruroides  vittatus  (Say) 
and  Centruroides  hentii  (Banks)  in  the  United  States  and  Mexico  (Scorpiones,  Buthidae).  Journal 
of  Arachnology  23:100-110. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  and  S.  I.  Golovatch.  2001.  New  records  of  the  milliped  family  Pyrgodesmidae 
(Polydesmida)  from  the  southeastern  United  States,  with  a  summary  of  the  fauna.  Entomological 
News  112(l):59-63. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  and  G.  B.  Edwards.  2001.  Introduction  of  the  milliped,  Helicorthomorpha  holstii, 
in  Florida  (Polydesmida:  Paradoxosomatidae).  Entomological  News  112(3):200. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  and  G.  B.  Edwards.  2002.  Introduction  of  the  milliped  family  Rhinocricidae  in 
Florida  (Spirobolida).  Entomological  News  113(4):270-274. 

Snider,  R.  M.  1 99 1 .  Updated  species  lists  and  distribution  records  for  the  Diplopoda  and  Chilopoda 
of  Michigan.  Michigan  Academician  24:177-194. 

Wood,  H.  C.  1865.  The  Myriapoda  of  North  America.  Transactions  of  the  American  Philosophical 
Society  13:137-248. 


CORRIGENDUM 

On  a  recently  published  paper  [Brailovsky,  Entomological  News 
115(1)],  the  name  Heteroptera  was  misspelled  as  Heteroptyera 
on  the  cover. 


78  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


OCCURRENCES  OF  THE  CENTIPEDES,  SCOLOPENDRA 
MORSITANS  L.  AND  S.  SUBSPINIPES  LEACH, 

ON  PACIFIC  ISLANDS 

(CHILOPODA:  SCOLOPENDROMORPHA: 

SCOLOPENDRIDAE)1 

Rowland  M.  Shelley2 

ABSTRACT:  The  scolopendrid  centipedes,  Scolopendra  morsitans  L.  and  S.  subspinipes  Leach, 
occur,  respectively,  in  14  and  16  nations  and  dependent  island  groups  in  Oceania,  most  of  which 
probably  represent  human  importations.  Both  species  are  known  from  the  Cook  Islands,  the 
Federated  States  of  Micronesia,  Fiji,  French  Polynesia,  Guam,  New  Caledonia,  the  Northern 
Marianna  Islands,  Papua  New  Guinea,  the  Republic  of  the  Marshall  Islands,  the  Solomon  Islands, 
Tonga,  and  Western  Samoa.  Published  records  are  summarized  and  new  ones  are  reported;  occur- 
rences are  depicted  on  a  distribution  map. 

KEY  WORDS:  Scolopendra  morsitans,  S.  subpinipes,  Chilopoda,  Scolopendromorpha,  Scolopen- 
dridae,  Pacific  Islands 

This  contribution  addresses  islands  in  the  broad  expanse  of  the  Pacific  Ocean 
referred  to  in  part  as  "Oceania"  -  east  of  Australia;  north  and  east  of  New 
Guinea;  east  of  the  Philippines,  Taiwan,  the  Ryukyu  Islands,  Japan,  and  the 
Kurile  Islands;  south  of  the  Kamchatka  Peninsula  and  the  Aleutian  Islands;  and 
west  of  the  continental  islands  of  the  Americas.  A  number  of  scolopendromorph 
centipedes  (ones  with  21  or  23  pairs  of  legs  and  pedal  segments)  have  been  intro- 
duced to  islands  in  this  vast  area,  and  I  address  here  the  relatively  large-bodied 
species  of  the  genus  Scolopendra  L.,  which  are  often  encountered  in  museums 
and  university  repositories.  They  belong  to  the  family  Scolopendridae,  subfami- 
ly Scolopendrinae;  have  valvular,  tripartite  spiracles;  and  are  thus  readily  distin- 
guished from  large-bodied  representatives  of  the  Otostigminae  (Ethmostigmus 
Pocock,  Otostigmus  Porat,  and  Rhysida  Wood),  which  have  rounded,  non- valvu- 
lar spiracles.  Scolopendra  itself  is  characterized  by  the  overlap  of  the  first  tergite 
by  the  cephalic  plate  and  by  a  prominent,  elongate,  ventrodistal  spine  on  the  first 
(proximo-)  tarsi  of  leg  pairs  1-20.  For  the  benefit  of  arthropod  researchers  in  the 
Pacific  who  will  likely  encounter  large  chilopods,  I  detail  the  known  occurrences 
of  S.  morsitans  L.  and  S.  subspinipes  Leach  in  the  defined  area;  both  lack  a  pro- 
curved,  transverse  groove  on  the  first  tergite  and  longitudinal  sutures  on  the 
cephalic  plate,  and  are  distinguished  primarily  by  the  number  of  ventral  spurs  on 
the  ultimate  prefemora.  I  provide  diagnoses,  literature  citations,  and  new  records 
from  institutional  holdings,  all  in  the  context  of  modern  geopolitical  boundaries; 
it  is  noteworthy  that  the  two  major  publications  on  scolopendromorphs  globally 
(Kraepelin  1903,  Attems  1930)  cite  no  records  of  these  species  from  the  Pacific 


1  Received  on  November  22,  2002.  Accepted  on  July  13,  2004. 

:  Research  Lab.,  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  4301  Reedy  Creek  Rd.,  Raleigh, 
North  Carolina  27607  U.S.A.  E-mail:  rowland.shelley@ncmail.net. 

Mailed  on  December  21,  2004 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 79_ 

region.  In  the  locality  listings,  which  are  organized  alphabetically,  national 
names  are  capitalized  and  specific  islands  or  island  groups  are  italicized;  miss- 
ing data  on  labels  (exact  locality,  date  of  collection,  and/or  names  of  collectors) 
are  not  reported,  and  the  number  of  specimens  in  each  sample  is  provided  after 
the  institutional  acronym.  To  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  all  names  for  the  islands 
and  communities  thereon  are  correct  and  accurately  spelled  as  of  2002.  It  was  not 
possible  to  survey  every  institution  that  potentially  houses  specimens,  but  I  have 
investigated  most  major  repositories  in  the  United  States  and  three  in  Europe. 
Acronyms  of  sources  of  preserved  samples  are  as  follows: 

AMNH  -American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  New  York,  New  York 

BM  -  Bishop  Museum,  Honolulu,  Hawaii 

BMNH     The  Natural  History  Museum,  London,  United  Kingdom 

CAS  -  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San  Francisco 

FMNH  -  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Chicago,  Illinois 

MCZ  -  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  University,  Cambridge, 

Massachusetts 

MNHP     Museum  National  d'Histoire  Naturelle,  Paris,  France 
NCSM  -  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  Raleigh 
NMNH  -  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution, 

Washington,  District  of  Columbia 
ZMH  -  Zoological  Institute  and  Museum,  University  of  Hamburg,  Germany 


Scolopendra  morsitans  L.,  1758 

Diagnosis:  Ultimate  prefemora  with  numerous  ventral  spurs,  usually 
arranged  in  three  rows  of  around  three  spurs  apiece.  Illustrations  are  available  in 
Attems  (1930,  fig.  38)  and  Shelley  (2002,  figs.  57-64). 

Published  Records:  PACIFIC  ISLANDS  IN  GENERAL  (Attems  1938).  COOK  ISLANDS: 
Aitutaki  (Chamberlin  1944).  Rarotonga  (Chamberlin  1920).  FEDERATED  STATES  OF  MICRONE- 
SIA: Pohnpei  (Kohlrausch  1881,  Chamberlin  1920).  FIJI:  Islands  in  general  (Kraepelin  1904, 
Brolemann  1904).  Viti  Levu,  Nacula,  Hofvea,  Yanuca,  Vatoa,  and  Sava  Kasa  (exact  location 
unknown)  (Wiirmli  1975).  Rotuma  (Pocock  1898,  Chamberlin  1920).  FRENCH  POLYNESIA: 
Austral  Is.:  Tubuai  (Kohlrausch  1881).  Marquesas  Is.:  Fatu  Hukit,  Hiva  Ova,  Mohotani,  and  Ua 
Huka  (Adamson  1932,  Silvestri  1939).  Society  Is.:  Tahiti  (Kohlrausch  1881,Wurmli  1975).  Tuamotu 
Is.:  Gambler  and  Mangareva  (Brolemann  1904).  Makatea  (Chamberlin  1944).  NEW  CALEDONIA: 
Noumea  (Brolemann  1904).  NORTHERN  MARIANNA  ISLANDS:  Islands  in  general  (Kraepelin 
1904,  Brolemann  1904).  REPUBLIC  OF  THE  MARSHALL  ISLANDS:  Islands  in  general  (Cham- 
berlin 1920).  TONGA:  Islands  in  general  (Kohlrausch  1881).  Eua  (Chamberlin  1920).  TUVALU: 
Funafuti  (Pocock  1898,  Chamberlin  1920).  WESTERN  SAMOA:  Upolu  (Kohlrausch  1881,  Cham- 
berlin 1920). 

New  Records:  FEDERATED  STATES  OF  MICRONESIA:  Kosrae.  Matante,  580  m,  under  bark 
of  dead  tree,  February  20,  1958,  J.  F.  G.  Clarke  (BM  1).  Ulit/ii  Atoll.  Asor  /..  October  6.  1952,  N.  L. 
H.  Krauss  (BM  1).  FIJI:  Ovalau.  Levuka  (BMNH  3).  Vanua  Levu  (BMNH  1).  Island  Unknown,  Wai 
Salima,  N.  L.  H.  Krauss  (NMNH  1).  FRENCH  POLYNESIA:  Tuamotu  Is.:  Raroia.  May  14,  1923 
(AMNH  1 ).  GUAM:  Patipoint,  in  petiole  of  dead  Cycas  frond,  June  4,  1945,  H.  S.  Dybas  (FMNH  1 ). 
KIRIBATI:  Tarawa.  Bairiki,  December  1957,  N.  L.  H.  Krauss  (BM  1);  Banraeaba,  December  1957, 


80  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


N.  L.  H.  Krauss  (BM  1);  Marenamuka,  under  coconut  log,  December  1957,  N.  L.  H.  Krauss  (BM 
many);  and  Naanika,  November  1957,  N.  L.  H.  Krauss  (BM  1).  NORTHERN  MARIANNA  IS- 
LANDS: Pagan,  N.  end  of  Lake  Laguna,  in  depression  on  young  coconut  tree  standing  in  water, 
September  10,  1954,  S.  Castro  (NMNH  2).  PAPUA  NEW  GUINEA:  Bougainville,  Kohura,  Prince 
Ra,  June  9,  1952  (BM  2).  REPUBLIC  OF  THE  MARSHALL  ISLANDS:  Majuro  Atoll.  Majuro,  on 
coconut  palm,  July  1,  1947,  A.  Spoehr  (FMNH  2).  Arno  Atoll,  Ine,  June  8,  1950, 1.  LaRivers  (BM  1). 
SOLOMON  ISLANDS:  Guadalcanal.  1944-1945,  W.  I.  Beecher,  F.  Cilley  (FMNH,  AMNH  44). 
New  Georgia,  Munda,  October  1,  1943  -  November  21,  1943,  W.  J.  Beecher  (FMNH  2)  and  Seghe, 
April  1944,  C.  O.  Berg  (NMNH  1 ).  Russel  Is.,  Bonika  /..  July  24,  1964,  R.  Straatman  (BM  1);  and 
Paruru  /.,  May  1943,  W.  J.  Beecher  (FMNH  2).  TONGA:  Tongatapu.  November  15.  1893.  R.  B. 
Leefe  (BMNH  4). 

Remarks:  Adamson  (1932)  believed  that  his  were  the  first  specific  records  of 
myriapods  from  the  Marquesas  (an  island  group  in  French  Polynesia)  except  for 
a  report  that  he  cited  of  S.  morsitans  (L.  Rollin,  1929,  Les  iles  Marquises,  p.  53, 
Paris),  which  is  not  available  to  me.  The  Marquesans  apparently  then  regarded 
S.  morsitans  as  a  native  species  and  so  named  it  in  their  native  tongue.  He  sug- 
gested that  the  species  had  reached  the  islands  as  a  "natural  immigrant"  or  had 
been  brought  in  by  the  Polynesians  themselves;  the  latter  seems  more  likely  as 
an  extreme  rafting  event  would  be  necessary  for  the  species  to  have  arrived  there 
naturally. 

Scolopendra  subspinipes  Leach,  1815 

Diagnosis:  Ultimate  prefemora  with  0-3  ventral  spurs.  Illustrations  are  avail- 
able in  Attems  (1930,  fig.  43)  and  Shelley  (2002,  figs.  50-56). 

Published  Records:  PACIFIC  ISLANDS  IN  GENERAL  (Attems  1938).  COOK  ISLANDS: 

Rarotonga  (Kohlrausch  1881).  FIJI:  Islands  in  general  (Silvestri  1935).  Ono-i-Lau  (Kraepelin  1904, 
Brolemann  1904,  Chamberlin  1920).  Levuka,  Munia,  Ovalau,  Viti  Levu  (Chamberlin  1920). 
FRENCH  POLYNESIA:  Marquesas,  Society,  and  Tuamotu  Islands  in  general  (Silvestri  1935). 
Marquesas  Is.:  Eiao,  Fatu  Hiva,  Mohotani,  Nuku-Hiva,  Tahuata,  Ua-huka,  and  Ua-Pou  (Adamson 
1932,  Silvestri  1939).  Hiva  Oa  (Adamson  1932,  Silvestri  1939,  Chamberlin  1944).  Society  Is.: 
Moorea  (Silvestri  1935).  Raiatea  (Kraepelin  1904,  Brolemann  1904).  Tahiti  (Kraepelin  1904,  Brole- 
mann 1904,  Chamberlin  1920,  Silvestri  1935).  Tuamotu  Is.:  Gambier  and  Mangareva  (Brolemann 
1904).  HAWAIIAN  ISLANDS:  Hawaii.  Kahoolawe,  Kauai.  Lanai,  Maui,  Midway,  and  Oahu 
(Shelley  2000;  previous  Hawaiian  records  summarized  herein  except  those  of  Kraepelin  [1904]  from 
the  islands  in  general  and  Oahu).  NEW  CALEDONIA:  lie  des  Pins  (Brolemann  1904).  NORTHERN 
MARIANNA  ISLANDS:  Islands  in  general  (Kraepelin  1904,  Brolemann  1904).  REPUBLIC  OF 
THE  MARSHALL  ISLANDS.  Islands  in  general  (Takakuwa  1938).  SOLOMON  ISLANDS:  Islands 
in  general  (Brolemann  1904).  SAMOA  ISLANDS  IN  GENERAL  (Kraepelin  1904,  Brolemann  1904, 
Attems  1914).  TONGA:  Islands  in  general  (Kraepelin  1904,  Brolemann  1904).  WESTERN  SAMOA: 
Upolu  (Chamberlin  1920;  Attems  1913,  1929). 

New  Records:  AMERICAN  SAMOA:  Tutuila.  November  8,  1923,  R.  H.  Beck  (AMNH  1 )  and 
Pago  Pago,  October  25,  1949,  L.  Zachowski,  H.  H.  Marrer  (NMNH  1).  BONIN  ISLANDS:  Chichi 
Jima  (Kondo),  July  3,  1949,  J.  Savory  (BM  2).  COOK  ISLANDS:  Rarotonga.  Avarua,  W.  M. 
Wheeler  (MCZ  4)  and  under  log,  February  1964,  N.  L.  H.  Krauss  (BM  1).  FEDERATED  STATES 
OF  MICRONESIA:  Tntk  Atoll,  intercepted  at  Hawaii,  January  27,  1949  (NMNH  1 );  Tol,  base  of  Mt. 
Unibot,  February  4,  1953,  J.  L.  Gressitt  (BM  1);  and  Mocn  I.,  December  3,  1945,  R.  L.  Ingram 
(NMNH  1).  Yap  I.,  September  10,  1979,  M.  Lundgren  (CAS  1);  Dugoi  Village,  on  trunk  of  orange 
tree,  August  25,  1950,  R.  J.  Goss  (BM  1 );  Ruuf,  from  creeping  vine,  August  29,  1950,  R.  J.  Goss  (BM 
2);  and  Dinay,  November  16,  1977,  M.  Lundgren  (CAS  1).  FIJI:  Ovalau.  1978,  W.  M.  Mann  (MCZ 
2)  and  Levuka,  1969,  W.  M.  Mann  (MCZ  1).  Viti  Levu,  Suva,  1915,  J.  P.  Jefferson  (MCZ  1). 
FRENCH  POLYNESIA:  Marquesas  Is.:  Fatu  Hiva.  January  6,  1925,  P.  H.  Johnson  (BMNH  1 ).  Hiva 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 81 


Oa,  November  30,  1922,  R.  H.  Beck,  E.H.  Quayle  (AMNH  2);  and  Taio  Hae  Bay,  Nuku,  under  rocks, 
October  6-8,  1934  (AMNH  3).  Mohotani,  500  ft.,  February  2,  1931.  Le  Bronnec,  H.  Tauroa  (BM  12). 
Nuku  Hiva,  nr.  Taiohae,  November  7,  1929,  Mumford,  A.  M.  Adamson  (BM  8)  and  under  log,  16 
January  1968,  J.  F.  G.  &  T.  M.  Clarke  (NMNH  1 ).  Tahuata,  January  1925,  P.  H.  Johnson  (BMNH  2). 
Society  Is.:  Bora  Bora,  1925,  L.  E.  Cheesman  (BMNH  2).  Moorea.  J.  A.  McTavish  (AMNH  4);  S  end 
of  Opunhoha  Bay,  beneath  piles  of  coconuts,  September  28  -  October  6,  1958,  D.  E.  Puleston 
(NMNH  8);  and  Opunoliu,  December  1958,  D.  E.  Puleston  (NMNH  1 ).  Raiatea.  July  1909  (AMNH 
1 )  and  under  box  in  shed.  July  29,  1909  (AMNH  2).  Tahiti,  Mt.  Aori,  2200',  human  feces,  April  6, 
1978,  T.  Mix  (FMNH  1);  Papeete,  November  10,  1899  (MCZ  1),  3/4  mi  ( 1 .2  km)  from  lagoon,  under 
rotten  logs,  April  23,  1925,  J.  M.  Clements  (NMNH  5),  and  nr.  foot  of  mts.  ca.  1  mi  (1.6  km)  from 
lagoon,  April  23,  1 925,  J.  M.  Clements  (NMNH  1 );  Papenoo,  March  1 925,  P.  H  Johnson  (BMNH  1 ); 
Pare  Dist.,  September  2,  1 96 1 ,  J.  F.  G.  Clarke  (NMNH  1 );  and  Tautira,  January  1960,  N.  L.  H.  Krauss 
(BM  1).  Tiiamotit  Is.:  Ahunui,  Lautiva,  September  8,  1925,  L.  L.  Bheerman  (BMNH  1).  Makatea, 
Uaite  Paua.  January  15-22,  1959,  D.  E.  Puleston  (NMNH  18).  Mangareva,  December  1914  (AMNH 
1 ).  Ramia,  Tua  Motu,  May  23,  1929,  D.  E.  Puleston  (NMNH  1 ).  Rangiroa,  September  7,  1982  (ZMH 
1).  GUAM:  July  1949,  J.  Kurfess  (FMNH  1).  Agarra,  December  25,  1947,  K.  L.  Maehler  (NMNH 
1 ).  NORTHERN  MARIANNA  ISLANDS:  Agrihan,  May  29,  1952,  J.  L.  Gressitt  (BM  1 ).  Fefen.  May 
27,  1946  (NMNH  1).  Pagan,  N.  End  of  Lake  Laguna,  in  depression  on  young  coconut  tree  standing 
in  water,  September  10,  1954,  S.  Castro  (NMNH  1).  Rota,  October  1945,  W.  L.  Necker  (FMNH  9); 
Sinapalo  Village,  June  1994,  M.  Lusk  (NCSM  8).  Saipan,  November  16  -  December  31,  1944,  Aug- 
ust 1945,  H.  S.  Dybas  (FMNH  6)  and  October  25,  1944,  E.  A.  Chapin  (NMNH  1).  Tinian,  May  18, 
1946  (NMNH  3).  PALMYRA  ISLAND:  C.  M.  Cooke  (BM  1).  PAPUA  NEW  GUINEA: 
Bougainville.  Whitney  South  Pacific  Expedition  (AMNH  1).  REPUBLIC  OF  THE  MARSHALL 
ISLANDS:  Jaluit  Is..  Jaborl.  April  25  -  May  1,  1958,  J.  L.  Gressitt  (BM  1 ).  SOLOMON  ISLANDS: 
Guadalcanal,  July  1945,  F.  Cilley  (AMNH  1).  New  Georgia,  Segi  Pt.,  April  1944,  C.  O.  Berg 
(NMNH  1).  Wana  Wana  L,  July  9,  1944,  Chapman  (CAS  1).  Treasury  Is.,  Stirling  I.,  1945,  R.  E.  Best 
(MCZ  1).  TONGA:  Nukualofa,  February  22,  1925,  P.  A.  Buxton  (BMNH  1 );  in  house,  January  1980, 
N.  L.  H.  Krauss  (BM  l);and  'Atenisi  Univ.',  April  11,  1981,  M  Walterding  (CAS  1).  Tongatapu  and 
Velitoa,  1962,  B.  Nixon  (CAS  2).  Vava'u.  along  Leimatu'a-Tefisi  Rd.,  January  10,  1982,  M. 
Walterding  (CAS  1).  Mand(s)  Unknown,  1888,  Dr.  Philippe  (MNHP  1).  WAKE  ISLAND:  February 
8,  1963,  C.  F.  Clegg  (BM  1).  WESTERN  SAMOA:  L'polu,  Apia,  May  19  -  September  1,  1924,  P.  A. 
Buxton  (BMNH  4). 

Remarks:  According  to  Attems  (1929),  bites  by  S.  subspinipes  on  the  hand 
are  common  in  Samoa.  While  S.  subspinipes  had  not  then,  and  apparently  still 
has  not,  been  taken  on  Haturu  and  Fatu  Huku  islands,  Adamson  ( 1 932)  noted  that 
S.  subspinipes  is  abundant  everywhere  in  the  Marquesas  from  sea  level  to  2,000' 
except  in  dry  regions;  it  also  was  not  taken  in  cloud  forest.  He  cited  native 
Marquesan  sources  who  believed  the  species  had  been  introduced  into  the  archi- 
pelago through  commerce  in  the  previous  50  years. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  thank  the  following  curators  and  collection  managers  for  loaning  or  providing  access  to  materi- 
al in  the  indicated  repositories:  N.  I.  Platnick  (AMNH).  S.  F.  Swift  (BM).  C.  E.  Griswold  (CAS).  P. 
Sierwald(FMNH),  L.  Leibensperger  (MCZ),  J.-P.  Mauries  (MNHP),  J.  A.  Coddington  (NMNH).  and 
H.  Dastych  (ZMH).  Samples  in  the  BMNH  were  examined  in  August  1997  upon  payment  of  full 
bench  fees;  travel  to  London  was  supported  by  a  grant  from  the  American  Philosophical  Society.  I 
am  particularly  grateful  to  my  colleagues  J.  G.  E.  Lewis,  for  providing  records  from  references  that 
I  was  unaware  of,  and  A.  Samuelson  and  T.  Gonsalves,  for  advice  on  island  names  and  localities. 


82 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


c/3 

1 


' 

OH 
§ 


I 


a 

1 

03 

«*- 

o 


(U 

o 


ao 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 83 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Adamson,  A.  M.  1932.  Myriopoda  of  the  Marquesas  Islands.  Bernice  P.  Bishop  Museum  Bulletin 
98:225-232. 

Attems,  C.  1913.  Botanische  und  Zoologische  Ergebnisse  einer  Wissenschaftlichen  Forschungs- 
reise  nach  den  Samoa-Inseln,  dem  Neuginea-Archipel  und  den  Salomonsinseln  von  Marz  bis 
Dezember  1905.  VII.  Myriopoda.  Denkschriften  der  Mathematisch  -Naturwissenschaftlichen 
Klasse  der  Kaiserlichen  Akademie  der  Wissenschaften,  89:683-  687. 

Attems,  C.  1914.  Die  indo-australischen  Myriopoden.  Archiv  fur  Naturgeschichte,  Vol.  for  1914:1- 
398. 

Attems,  C.  1929.  Myriopoden  (Myriopoda).  Pp  29-34,  //;.  Insects  of  Samoa,  88(2)  -  Terrestrial 
Arthropoda  other  than  Insects.  British  Museum  (Natural  History). 

Attems,  C.  1930.  Myriapoda  2.  Scolopendromorpha.  Das  Tierreich,  54:1-308. 

Attems,  C.  1938.  Myriapoden  von  Hawai.  Proceedings  of  the  Zoological  Society  of  London,  Series 
B,  108:365-387. 

Brolemann,  H.  VV.  1904.  Catalogue  des  Scolopendrides  des  collections  du  Museum  d'Histoire 
Naturelle  de  Paris.  Bulletin  du  Museum  d'Histoire  Naturelle  5:243-324. 

Chamberlin,  R.  V.  1920.  The  Myriopoda  of  the  Australian  Region.  Bulletin  of  the  Museum  of 
Comparative  Zoology  64:1-269. 

Chamberlin,  R.  V.  1944.  Chilopods  in  the  collections  of  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History. 
Zoological  Series,  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History  28:175-216. 

Kohlrausch,  E.  1 88 1 .  Gattungen  und  Arten  der  Scolopendriden.  Archiv  fur  Naturgeschichte  47:50- 
132. 

Kraepelin,  K.  1903.  Revision  der  Scolopendriden.  Mitteilungen  aus  dem  Naturhistorischen  Mu- 
seum, Hamburg,  20:1-276. 

Kraepelin,  K.  1904.  Catalogue  des  Scolopendrides  des  collections  du  Museum  d'Histoire  Naturelle 
de  Paris  (Collection  du  Museum  determine/e  par  M.  Le  professeur  Karl  Kraepelin,  et  collection 
H.  W.  Brolemann).  Bulletin  du  Museum  d'Histoire  Naturelle,  Vol.  for  1904:243-253,  316-325. 

Pocock,  R.  I.  1898.  List  of  the  Arachnida  and  "Myriopoda"  obtained  in  Funafuti  by  Prof.  W.  J. 
Sollas  and  Mr.  Stanley  Gardiner,  and  in  Rotuma  by  Mr.  Stanley  Gardiner.  Annals  and  Magazine 
of  Natural  History,  Sen  7,  1:321-329. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2000.  The  centipede  order  Scolopendromorpha  in  the  Hawaiian  Islands  (Chilopoda). 
Bishop  Museum  Occasional  Papers  64:39-48. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2002.  A  synopsis  of  the  North  American  centipedes  of  the  order  Scolopendromorpha 
(Chilopoda).  Virginia  Museum  of  Natural  History  Memoir  5:1-108. 

Silvestri,  F.  1935.  Myriopoda  from  the  Society  Islands.  Bernice  P.  Bishop  Museum  Bulletin  113: 
131-134. 

Silvestri,  F.  1939.  A  further  report  on  Marquesan  Myriopoda.  Bernice  P.  Bishop  Museum  Bulletin 
142:3-11. 

Takakuvva,  Y.  1938.  Verzeichnis  der  Japanischen  und  Mandschureischcn  Chilopodenarten.  Anno- 
tationes  Zoologicae  Japonenses  17:353-359. 

Wiirmli,  M.  1975.  Systematische  Kriterien  in  der  Gruppe  von  Scolopendra  morsitans  Linne,  1758 
(Chilopoda,  Scolopendridae).  Deutsche  entomologische  Zeitschrift  N.  F.  22:201-206. 


84  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


HIGHER  CLASSIFICATION  OF  THE  BURROWING 
MAYFLIES  (EPHEMEROPTERA:  SCAPPHODONTA)1 

W.  P.  McCafferty2 

ABSTRACT:  A  revised  cladogram  of  the  monophyletic  groups  of  genera  constituting  the  tusked  bur- 
rowing mayflies  (infraorder  Scapphodonta)  is  presented,  based  in  part  on  new  analyses  of  relationships 
that  have  recently  appeared  in  the  literature.  A  new  strict  phylogenetic  higher  classification  of 
Scapphodonta  that  incorporates  both  extant  and  extinct  taxa  and  that  reflects  the  revised  cladogram  is 
presented.  Aspects  include  the  new  superfamilies  Potamanthoidea  (Potamanthidae  and  Australiphe- 
meridae)  and  Euthyplocioidea  (Euthyplociidae  and  Pristiplociidae),  and  a  newly  restricted  Ephem- 
eroidea  (Ichthybotidae,  Ephemeridae  s.s.,  Palingeniidae  and  Polymitarcyidae  s.s.).  Sequencing  con- 
ventions allow  recognition  of  multiple  scapphodont  superfamilies,  ephemeroid  families  and  polymitar- 
cyid  subfamilies.  Pentagenia  is  placed  in  Palingeniidae,  and  Cretomitarcys  is  removed  from  the 
Scapphodonta. 

KEY  WORDS:  Higher  classification,  burrowing  mayflies,  Ephemeroptera,  Scapphodonta 

The  Ephemeroptera  infraorder  Scapphodonta  is  equivalent  to  what  was  recently 
considered  the  superfamily  Ephemeroidea  by  McCafferty  (1991)  and  others.  It  is  a 
grouping  hypothesized  to  be  the  sister  clade  of  the  infraorder  Pannota,  or  the  pan- 
note  mayflies,  within  the  suborder  Furcatergalia  (McCafferty  and  Wang  2000).  The 
Scapphodonta  are  technically  the  "tusked  burrowing  mayflies"  and  as  a  mono- 
phyletic group  demonstrate  a  defining  apomorphy  of  having  larval  tusks  derived 
from  the  outer  body  of  the  mandible  (e.g.,  see  Bae  and  McCafferty  1995).  Scap- 
phodonta does  not  include  other  furcatergalian  mayflies  constituting  the  Behningi- 
idae  (the  infraorder  Palpotarsa,  or  tuskless  "primitive  burrowing  mayflies")  or  the 
few  specialized  Leptophlebiidae  (infraorder  Lanceolata)  that  are  also  known  to  bur- 
row and  may  possess  tusks  that  are  not  homologous  with  scapphodont  tusks  (e.g., 
see  Bae  and  McCafferty  1995,  Edmunds  and  McCafferty  1996). 

McCafferty  (1991)  presented  hypothetical  relationships  of  burrowing  mayfly 
groups  that  served  as  a  basis  for  exemplifying  the  application  of  strict  phylogenetic 
schemes  of  higher  classification  to  Ephemeroptera.  This  resulted  in  a  conservative 
familial  classification  of  the  Ephemeroidea,  or  Scapphodonta,  that  has  to  a  large 
degree  been  followed  throughout  the  world  in  recent  years.  That  classification 
consisted  of  only  four  families:  Australiphemeridae,  Potamanthidae,  Ephemeridae, 
and  Polymitarcyidae.  Ephemeridae  was  divided  into  subfamilies  Ichthybotinae, 
Ephemerinae,  Hexageniinae,  Pentageniinae  and  Palingeniinae.  All  of  these  sub- 
families except  Hexageniinae  had  been  recognized  as  families  at  some  point  prior 
to  1991.  Ichthybotinae,  which  had  originally  been  considered  a  family  by  Demou- 
lin  (1957a)  but  historically  not  such  by  others,  was  reestablished  by  McCafferty 
(1999).  Polymitarcyidae  was  divided  into  the  subfamilies  Pristiplociinae,  Euthy- 
plociinae,  Exeuthyplociinae,  Asthenopodinae,  Campsurinae  and  Polymitarcyinae. 


1  Received  March  1,  2004.  Accepted  July  7,  2004. 

2  Department  of  Entomology,  Purdue  University,  West  Lafayette,  Indiana  47905,  U.S.A.   E-mail: 
mccaffer@purdue.edu. 

Mailed  on  December  21,  2004 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 85_ 

Previous  to  this,  however,  the  latter  three  had  been  considered  in  a  more  restrict- 
ed family  Polymitarcyidae,  and  Euthyplociinae  and  Exeuthyplociinae  had  been 
considered  in  the  family  Euthyplociidae.  Pristiplociidae  was  given  familial  sta- 
tus by  McCafferty  (1997). 

Since  the  McCafferty  (1991)  study,  certain  characters  from  internal  anatomy 
that  had  been  documented  by  Landa  and  Soldan  (1985)  and  used  by  McCafferty 
(1991)  have  proven  to  be  unreliable  mainly  because  they  had  been  based  on  too 
few  exemplars  within  taxa.  In  addition,  important  new  phylogenetic  analyses  of 
burrowing  mayflies  were  made  by  Bae  and  McCafferty  (1995)  and  Kluge  (2003). 
These  findings  along  with  ancillary  studies  by  McCafferty  (1999)  and  McCaf- 
ferty and  Wang  (2000)  have  prompted  a  reevaluation  and  reclassification  of  the 
Scapphodonta  as  presented  below. 

PHYLOGENY 

Compared  to  the  analysis  of  McCafferty  (1991),  the  phylogenetic  analysis 
based  on  tusk  morphology  given  by  Bae  and  McCafferty  (1995)  offered  a  more 
convincing  hypothesis  of  branching  sequences  of  certain  clades,  one  example 
being  that  the  Campsurus  group  (Campsurinae)  and  Asthenopus  group  (Astheno- 
podinae)  were  sister  clades  rather  than  the  Campsurus  group  and  the  Ephoron 
group  (Polymitarcyinae).  The  Campsurus  group  and  Asthenopus  group  tusks 
were  shown  to  share  an  apomorphic  large  mediobasal  spine,  medioapical  crenu- 
lation  and  ventral  setation.  The  Bae  and  McCafferty  (1995)  study  also  showed 
that  within  the  extant  Scapphodonta  excluding  the  basally  derived  Potamanthus 
group  (Potamanthidae),  the  Euthyplocia  +  Exeuthyplocia  groups  (Euthyplociinae 
and  Exeuthyplociinae)  do  not  share  additional  apomorphies  with  other  clades, 
but  have  tusks  with  unique  medial  and  lateral  rows  of  setae.  Among  remaining 
clades,  the  Pentagenia  group  (Pentageniinae)  +  the  Palingenia  group  (Palin- 
geniinae)  were  hypothesized  to  be  derived  from  an  ancestor  common  with  the 
Ephemera  group  (Ephemerinae)  +  Hexagenia  group  (Hexageniinae)  rather  than 
from  within  the  Hexagenia  group.  This  is  supported  by  the  apomorphic  strong 
basal  arch  of  the  tusks  in  Ephemera  +  Hexagenia  groups  but  not  Pentagenia  + 
Palingenia  groups,  and  by  the  apomorphic  U-shaped  or  arched  arrangement  of 
setae  basally  on  the  tusks  found  in  Pentagenia  +  Palingenia  groups  but  not  the 
Ephemera  +  Hexagenia  groups. 

Kluge  (2003)  also  presented  data  that  suggested  the  Euthvplocia  + 
Exeuthyplocia  groups  to  have  a  basal  branching  position  among  non-potaman- 
thid  Scapphodonta,  and  gave  another  synapomorphy  for  these  groups,  i.e.,  the 
unique  anteriorly  developed  clypeus.  In  addition,  he  hypothesized  a  sister  rela- 
tionship between  a  clade  consisting  of  the  Ephoron  +  Campsurus  +  Asthenopus 
groups  and  a  clade  consisting  of  the  Pentagenia  +  Palingenia  groups.  For  exam- 
ple, these  clades  were  shown  to  share  apomorphies  including  forecoxae  that  are 
nearly  contiguous,  and  an  inner  basal  convexity  of  the  larval  forefemora  with  a 
curved  arrangement  of  setae  [Kluge  also  included  use  of  the  arrangement  of  setae 
at  the  base  of  the  tusk  that  had  been  introduced  by  Bae  and  McCafferty  ( 1 995 ) 


86  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


for  the  Pentagenia  +  Palingenia  groups,  see  above].  Although  Kluge  (2003)  stat- 
ed that  two-segmented  maxillary  and  labial  palps  represented  another  synapo- 
morphy  for  the  Pentagenia  +  Palingenia  +  Ephoron  +  Campsurus  +  Asthenopus 
groups,  the  assigned  character  states  of  two-  or  three-segmented  palps  are  not 
consistently  distributed  within  this  latter  grouping  or  its  hypothesized  sister 
clade,  or  nearest  outgroup  (Ephemera  +  Hexagenia  groups).  For  example,  larvae 
of  Pentagenia  vittigera  (Walsh)  frequently  have  a  second  segmentation  line  in 
the  maxillary  palps,  and  the  labial  palps  of  genera  of  the  Hexagenia  group  (e.g., 
Litobrancha  McCafferty  and  some  Hexagenia  Walsh)  are  commonly  two-seg- 
mented, as  are  species  within  the  Ephemera  group  (e.g.,  at  least  some  Afromera 
Demoulin).  Kluge's  statement  of  synapomorphy  might  better  have  been  limited 
to  the  thicker,  clublike,  rounded  palps  (versus  narrow,  falcate  or  truncate  palps). 

The  hypothesis  of  the  sister  relationship  of  Pentagenia  +  Palingenia  groups 
and  the  Ephoron  +  Campsurus  +  Asthenopus  groups  is  considerably  different 
from  the  proposed  relationships  of  Palingeniidae  and  Ephemeridae  first  given  by 
McCafferty  (1972)  and  McCafferty  and  Edmunds  (1976)  and  expressed  in  the 
McCafferty  (1991)  scheme.  However,  behavioral  evolutionary  trends  among  the 
Scapphodonta  that  were  theorized  by  Bae  and  McCafferty  (1995)  remain  for  the 
most  part  compatible  with  Kluge's  phylogenetic  hypothesis.  In  addition,  func- 
tional and  behavioral  differences  associated  with  burrowing  in  Hexagenia  and 
Pentagenia  Walsh  (Keltner  and  McCafferty  1986)  as  well  as  similarities  between 
Pentagenia  and  Tortopus  Needham  and  Murphy  (Campsurus  group)  (McCaf- 
ferty unpublished)  are  also  compatible  with  Kluge's  hypothesis.  Essentially, 
Pentagenia  +  Palingenia  +  Ephoron  +  Campsurus  +  Asthenopus  groups  demon- 
strate what  appears  to  be  well-armored  and  heavily  sclerotized  heads  and  tusks 
associated  with  an  advanced  type  of  burrowing  that  can  involve  chiseling  into 
hard  substrates  or  compacted  substrates  such  as  clay  (e.g.,  Edmunds  et  al.  1956, 
Scott  et  al.  1959,  Keltner  and  McCafferty  1986,  Bae  and  McCafferty  1995,  Ed- 
munds and  McCafferty  1996).  Although  the  capacity  for  this  type  of  burrowing 
may  not  be  strictly  realized  in  the  individual  microhabitats  of  every  species  with- 
in the  clade,  it  does  not  exist  in  other  Scapphodonta.  The  significant  change  from 
the  Bae  and  McCafferty  (1995)  interpretation  is  that  this  behavioral  trend 
evolved  only  once  rather  than  twice  independently  within  the  Scapphodonta. 

Kluge's  (2003)  additional  hypothesis  of  a  derivation  of  Behningiidae  within 
the  Scapphodonta  is  not  convincing  because  it  was  based  on  suppositions  that 
numerous  characters  only  possibly  derived  in  common  with  the  Scapphodonta 
were  lost  subsequently  in  Behningiidae.  Behningiidae  forewings  are  unlike 
Scapphodonta  in  general  and  the  most  plesiotypic  adults  of  Pannota  (Neoephe- 
meridae)  in  that  they  demonstrate  only  an  inconsistent,  slight  tendency  for  basal 
vein  curvature  (possibly  but  not  necessarily  suggesting  a  phylogenetic  branch 
basad  of  the  common  ancestor  of  the  Scapphodonta  and  Pannota);  larvae  do  not 
possess  tusks  or  other  apomorphic  structures  that  are  associated  with  burrowing 
in  Scapphodonta  (and  there  is  no  evidence  that  precursors  to  Behningiidae  pos- 
sessed tusks  or  such  structures);  and  larvae  are  known  to  be  an  unusual  type  of 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 


87 


interstitial  sand-dwellers  with  predatory  habits  (Keffermiiller  1959,  Tshernova 
and  Bajkova  1960,  McCafferty  1975,  Tsui  and  Hubbard  1979),  a  biology  funda- 
mentally dissimilar  to  that  found  among  the  Scapphodonta.  In  addition,  the  con- 
siderable unique  morphology  associated  with  both  the  larvae  (e.g.,  legs)  and 
adults  (e.g.,  genitalia)  of  Behningiidae  (see  McCafferty  1979,  Peters  and  Gillies 
1 99 1 )  does  not  appear  to  be  derived  in  common  with,  or  derived  from,  any  Scap- 
phodonta. 

Considering  all  of  the  above,  certain  phylogenetic  modifications  can  now  be 
made  to  the  cladogram  of  Scapphodonta  originally  offered  by  McCafferty 
(1991).  Such  a  revised  cladogram  of  the  monophyletic  groups  of  genera  of  the 
Scapphodonta  is  shown  in  Figure  1 . 


POTAMANTHUS  group 
AUSTRALIPHEMERA  group 
EUTHYPLOCIA  group 
EXEUTHYPLOCIA  group 


PRISTIPLOCIA  group 

ICHTHYBOTUS  group 

EPHEMERA  group 

-  HEXAGENIA  group 

-  PENTAGENIA  group 

-  PALINGENIA  group 

-  EPHORON  group 

-  CAMPSURUS  group 
ASTHENOPUS  group 


Fig.  1 .  Hypothesized  cladogram  of  monophyletic  groups  of  genera  of  Scapphodonta.  See 
text  for  defining  apomorphies. 


88  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


CLASSIFICATION 

The  new  phylogeny  in  turn  requires  a  new,  strict  phylogenetic  higher  classifi- 
cation designed  within  the  constructs  of  Linnaean  hierarchy.  Such  a  classifica- 
tion (Table  1)  can  reflect  the  branching  sequences  of  major  clades  (Fig.  1)  with- 
out the  use  of  any  numerical  coding  system. 

Table  1.  Higher  classification  of  the  Scapphodonta.  Within  superfamilies,  single  aster- 
isked taxa  are  known  from  fossils  only,  and  double  asterisked  taxa  include  both  extant  and 
extinct  species.  Bracketed  genera  are  those  whose  relationships  within  the  monophyletic 
group  of  genera  remain  unresolved.  General  distributions  are  given  parenthetically. 

Superfamily  Potamanthoidea,  n.  superfam. 

Family  Potamanthidae  Albarda  (Holarctic,  Oriental) 
Genus  Rhoenanthus  Eaton 

Subgenus  Rhoenanthus  s.s. 
Subgenus  Potamanthindus  Lestage 
Genus  Anthopotamus  McCafferty  &  Bae 
Genus  Potamanthus  Pictet 

Subgenus  Potamanthus  s.s. 
Subgenus  Stygifloris  Bae,  McCafferty  &  Edmunds 
Family  Australiphemeridae*  McCafferty  (Pangaean) 

[Genera  Australiphemera  McCafferty,  Borephemera  Sinitshenkova,  Microphemera 
McCafferty,  Paleoanthus  Kluge] 

Superfamily  Euthyplocioidea,  n.  superfam. 

Family  Euthyplociidae  Lestage  (Pantropical) 

Subfamily  Euthyplociinae  s.s.  (Pantropical) 

[Genera  Campylocia  Needham  &  Murphy,  Euthyplocia  Eaton,  Mesoplocia 
Demoulin,  Polyplocia  Lestage,  Proboscidoplocia  Demoulin] 
Subfamily  Exeuthyplociinae  Gillies  (Afrotropical) 
Genus  Afroplocia  Lestage 
Genus  Exeuthyplocia  Lestage 
Family  Pristiplociidae*  McCafferty  (Gondwanan) 
Genus  Pristiplocia  McCafferty 

Superfamily  Ephemeroidea 

Family  Ichthybotidae  Demoulin  (New  Zealand) 

Genus  Ichthybotus  Eaton 
Family  Ephemeridae**  Latreille  (nee  Australian) 

Subfamily  Ephemerinae**  s.s.  (nee  Neotropical,  nee  Australian) 
Genus  Ephemera**  Linnaeus 
Subgenus  Ephemera  s.s. 

Subgenus  Aethephemera  McCafferty  &  Edmunds 
Genus  Afromera  Demoulin 

Subfamily  Hexageniinae**  McCafferty  (nee  Australian) 
Genus  Denina*  McCafferty 
Genus  Hexagenia**  Walsh 

Subgenus  Hexagenia**  s.s. 
Subgenus  Pseudeatonica  Spieth 


Vol.  115.  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004 89_ 

Genus  Litobrancha**  McCafferty 

Genus  Eatonigenia  Ulmer 

Genus  Eatonica  Navas 

Family  Palingeniidae  Albarda  (nee  Australian,  nee  Neotropical) 
Subfamily  Pentageniinae  McCafferty  (Nearctic) 

Genus  Pentagenia  Walsh 
Subfamily  Palingeniinae  s.s.  (E.  Hemisphere,  nee  Australian) 

[Genera  Anagenesia  Eaton,  Chankagenesia  Buldovsky,  Cheirogenesia 

Demoulin,  Mortogenesia  Lestage,  Palingenia  Burmeister, 

Plethogenesia  Ulmer] 
Family  Polymitarcyidae**  Banks  (nee  Australian) 

Subfamily  Polymitarcyinae  s.s.  (nee  Australian,  nee  Neotropical) 

Genus  Ephoron  Williamson 
Subfamily  Campsurinae**  Traver  (Neotropical,  Nearctic) 

Genus  Campsunis  Eaton 

Genus  Tortopus  Needham  &  Murphy 

[Genus  Mesopalingea*  Whalley  &  Jarzembowski  (Laurasian)] 
Subfamily  Asthenopodinae  Edmunds  and  Traver  (Pantropical) 

Genus  Asthenopus  Eaton 

Genus  Povilla  Eaton 

[Genus  Asthenopodichnium*  Thenius] 

Sequencing  conventions  (see  Wiley  1981)  are  utilized  for  recognizing  three 
superfamilies  within  Scapphodonta,  four  families  within  the  Ephemeroidea,  and 
three  subfamilies  within  the  Polymitarcyidae.  The  hypothesized  cladogram  of 
superfamilies,  families  and  subfamilies  can  be  reproduced  precisely  from  their 
linear  hierarchical  classification.  Within  certain  families  or  subfamilies,  the  phy- 
logeny  of  genera  has  been  hypothesized  previously.  For  the  basis  of  the  linear  se- 
quence of  taxa  within  Potamanthidae,  see  Bae  and  McCafferty  (1991);  and  for 
the  basis  of  the  linear  sequence  of  taxa  within  the  Ephemeridae,  see  McCafferty 
(1973,  1987),  McCafferty  and  Gillies  (1979)  and  McCafferty  and  Sinitshenkova 
(1983).  Those  genera  that  are  listed  alphabetically  within  brackets  in  Table  1 
require  cladistic  analysis  before  their  interrelationships  can  be  hypothesized. 

The  placement  of  the  extinct  families  Australiphemeridae  and  Pristiplociidae 
(shown  by  dashed  lines  in  Fig.  1)  is  presently  hypothesized  from  morphological 
data  limited  to  alate  fossils.  Some  recent  genera  in  other  families  of  Scappho- 
donta are  represented  in  the  Cenozoic,  but  no  recent  genera  are  represented  in  the 
fossil  record  previous  to  the  Cenozoic.  The  present  and  historical  placement  of 
Mesozoic  genera  among  recent  families  is  either  unfounded  or  provisionally 
based  on  limited  morphological  data.  Mesogenesia  Tshernova  was  originally 
described  in  the  Palingeniidae  (Tshernova  1977),  and  Demoulin  (1957b)  consid- 
ered Parabaetis  Haupt  in  Ephemeridae,  but  both  genera  were  shown  not  to 
belong  to  the  Scapphodonta  by  McCafferty  (1990).  The  genus  Mesopalingea 
Whalley  and  Jarzembowski  (1985)  was  originally  placed  in  the  family 
Palingeniidae.  However,  based  on  the  morphology  of  the  well-fossilized  larval 
tusks,  the  genus  should  provisionally  be  placed  in  the  subfamily  Campsurinae  of 


90  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


the  family  Polymitarcyidae.  This  would  represent  a  rare  instance  of  a  Mesozoic 
family  of  Scapphodonta  surviving  the  K-T  boundary  and  the  mass  extinctions 
associated  with  that  critical  juncture.  Cretomitarcys  Sinitshenkova  (subfamily 
Cretomitarcyinae  Sinitshenkova)  was  based  on  an  alate  specimen  found  in  upper 
Cretaceous  New  Jersey  amber.  Sinitshenkova's  (2000)  placement  of  this  mayfly 
in  the  family  Polymitarcyidae  is  not  supportable  because  wing  venation  charac- 
teristics, including  lack  of  fundamental  basal  vein  curvature  and  the  orientation 
of  cubital  and  anal  veins  in  the  forewings  are  not  those  of  Scapphodonta.  Instead, 
forewing  venation,  such  as  the  uninterrupted  extension  of  veins  CuP  and  Al  from 
the  base  of  the  forewing  to  the  outer  margin,  suggests  an  extinct  family  (Creto- 
mitarcyidae,  n.  stat.)  of  the  suborder  Carapacea,  and  extensive  longitudinal  vena- 
tion of  the  hindwing  may  further  suggest  a  relationship  with  the  family  Baetis- 
cidae  [compare  Figs.  3  and  4  of  Sinitshenkova  (2000)  with  Figs.  226a  and  b  of 
Edmunds  etal.  (1976)]. 

An  important  aspect  of  the  new  classification  of  Scapphodonta  taxa  is  the 
recognition  of  two  additional  superfamilies  and  the  restriction  of  the  concept  of 
the  superfamily  Ephemeroidea.  The  placement  of  the  North  American  genus 
Pentagenia  is  also  of  some  significance  because  it  adds  another  family  of  may- 
flies (Palingeniidae)  to  the  North  American  fauna.  The  placement  of  Pentagenia 
as  such  had  been  proposed  by  McCafferty  and  Edmunds  (1976),  but  at  that  time 
it  was  supposed  that  the  Palingeniidae  had  arisen  from  within  Ephemeridae,  and 
thus  recognition  of  the  two  families  was  later  deemed  incompatible  with  a  phy- 
logenetic  classification  because  of  assumed  paraphyly  (McCafferty  1991).  The 
family  Ichthybotidae  is  somewhat  an  anomaly  because  of  its  geographic  restric- 
tion to  New  Zealand  in  the  absence  of  any  other  known  Amphinotic  Scappho- 
donta. McCafferty  (1999)  explained  it  as  being  relictual,  suggesting  that  Scap- 
phodonta was  probably  more  widely  distributed  in  the  Southern  Hemisphere 
prior  to  the  K-T  extinctions. 

The  familial  classification  presented  here,  including  the  linear  sequence  of 
families,  is  for  the  most  part  similar  to  that  given  a  half  century  ago  by  Edmunds 
and  Traver  (1954).  This  may  seem  remarkable  if  one  considers  that  the  former 
classification  was  phenetic  based.  Some  families  have  been  slightly  redefined  or 
restricted  in  the  new  classification,  Behningiidae  has  been  removed;  and  the 
familial  classification,  including  extinct  families,  would  not  be  allowable  under 
strict  rules  of  phylogenetic  classification  within  a  single  superfamily.  Never- 
theless, the  comparison  illustrates  that  family  recognition  in  mayflies  based  on 
phenetic  analyses  may  to  a  large  degree  be  congruent  with  family  recognition 
within  a  strict  phylogenetic  system.  This  should  not  detract  from  the  importance 
of  continuing  to  test  and  refine  classifications  based  on  cladistics,  but  instead 
illustrates  that  relative  stability  can  sometimes  be  maintained  by  choosing  among 
strict  phylogenetic  classification  options. 


Vol.  115,  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004  91 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bae,  Y.  J.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1995.  Ephemeroptera  tusks  and  their  evolution,  pp.  377-403.  In. 
L.  D.  Corkum  and  J.  J.  H.  Ciborowski  (Editors).  Current  directions  in  research  on  Ephemeroptera. 
Canadian  Scholars'  Press,  Toronto,  Canada.  478  pp. 

Bae,  Y.  J.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1991.  Phylogenetic  systematics  of  the  Potamanthidae 
(Ephemeroptera).  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  117:  1-143. 

Demoulin,  G.  1957a.  Remarques  critiques  sur  la  position  systematique  des  Ichthvbotus  Eaton, 
Ephemeropteres  de  Nouvelle  Zelande.  Bulletin  et  Annales  de  la  Societe  Royale  Entomologique 
de  Belgique  93:  335-337. 

Dm)  mi  I  in.  G.  1957b.  A  propos  de  deux  insectes  Eocenes.  Bulletin  de  Tlnstitut  Royal  des  Sciences 
Naturelles  de  Belgique  33(45):  1-4. 

Edmunds,  G.  F.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1996.  New  field  observations  on  burrowing  in 
Ephemeroptera  from  around  the  world.  Entomological  News  107:  68-76. 

Edmunds,  G.  F.  and  J.  R.  Traver.  1954.  An  outline  of  reclassification  of  the  Ephemeroptera. 
Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  56:  236-240. 

Edmunds,  G.  F.,  S.  L.  Jensen,  and  L.  Berner.  1976.  The  mayflies  of  North  and  Central  America. 
University  of  Minnesota  Press,  Minneapolis,  Minnesota.  330  pp. 

Edmunds,  G.  F.,  L.  T.  Neilsen,  and  J.  R.  Larsen.  1956.  The  life  history  of  Ephoron  album  (Say) 
(Ephemeroptera:  Polymitarcidae).  Wasmann  Journal  of  Biology  14:  145-153. 

Kefferm tiller,  M.  1959.  New  data  concerning  Ephemeroptera  within  the  genus  Ametropus  Alb.  and 
Behningia  Lest.  Poznan  Society  of  Friends  of  Science,  Biology  19(5):  1-32. 

Keltner,  J.  and  VV.  P.  McCafferty.  1986.  Functional  morphology  of  burrowing  in  the  mayflies 
Hexagenia  limbata  and  Pentagenia  vittigera.  Zoological  Journal  of  the  Linnaean  Society  87: 
139-162. 

Kluge,  N.  J.  2003.  System  and  phylogeny  of  Pinnatitergaliae  (Ephemeroptera).  pp.  145-152.  In,  E. 
Gaino  (Editor),  Research  update  on  Ephemeroptera  &  Plecoptera.  University  of  Perugia  Press, 
Perugia,  Italy. 

Landa,  V.  and  T.  Soldan.  1985.  Phylogeny  and  higher  classification  of  the  order  Ephemeroptera:  a 
discussion  from  the  comparative  anatomical  point  of  view.  Srudie  CSAV.  Academia.  Prague, 
Czechoslovakia.  121  pp. 

McCafferty,  VV.  P.  1972.  Pentageniidae:  a  new  family  of  Ephemeroidea  (Ephemeroptera).  Journal 
of  the  Georgia  Entomological  Society  7:  51-56. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  1973.  Systematic  and  zoogeographic  aspects  of  Asiatic  Ephemeridae  (Ephe- 
meroptera). Oriental  Insects  7:  49-67. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  1975.  The  burrowing  mayflies  of  the  United  States  (Ephemeroptera:  Ephe- 
meroidea). Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  101:  447-504. 

McCafferty,  VV.  P.  1979.  Evolutionary  trends  among  the  families  of  Ephemeroidea.  pp.  45-50.  In. 
K.  Pasternak  and  R.  Sowa  (Editors).  Proceedings  of  the  Second  International  Conference  on 
Ephemeroptera.  Polish  Academy  of  Sciences  Laboratory  of  Water  Biology,  August  23-26,  1975. 
Panstwowe  Wydawnictwo  Naukwe,  Warsaw.  Poland.  312  pp. 

McCafferty,  VV.  P.  1987.  New  fossil  mayfly  in  amber  and  its  relationships  among  extant  Ephe- 
meridae (Ephemeroptera).  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  80:  472-474. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  1990.  Chapter  2:  Ephemeroptera.  pp.  20-50.  //;,  D.  A.  Grimaldi  (Editor),  Insects 
from  the  Santana  Formation,  lower  Cretaceous,  of  Bra/il.  Bulletin  of  the  American  Museum  of 
Natural  History  no.  195.  19 1  pp. 


92  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


McCafferty,  W.  P.  1991.  Toward  a  phylogenetic  classification  of  the  Ephemeroptera  (Insecta):  a 
commentary  on  systematics.  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  84:  343-360. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  1997.  Discovery  and  analysis  of  the  oldest  mayflies  (Insecta:  Ephemeroptera) 
known  from  amber.  Bulletin  Societe  Histoire  Naturelle,  Toulouse  133:  77-82. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  1999.  Biodiversity  and  Biogeography:  examples  from  global  studies  of 
Ephemeroptera.  Proceedings  of  the  Symposium  on  Nature  Conservation  and  Entomology  in  the 
21st  Century,  Entomological  Society  of  Korea  1999:  3-22. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  and  G.  F.  Edmunds.  1976.  Redefinition  of  the  family  Palingeniidae  and  its 
implications  for  the  higher  classification  of  Ephemeroptera.  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society 
of  America  69:  486-490. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  and  M.  T.  Gillies.  1979.  The  African  Ephemeridae  (Ephemeroptera).  Aquatic 
Insects  1:  169-178. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  and  N.  D.  Sinitshenkova.  1983.  Litobrancha  from  the  Oligocene  in  eastern 
Asia  (Ephemeroptera:  Ephemeridae).  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  76:  205- 
208. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  and  T.-Q.  Wang.  2000.  Phylogenetic  systematics  of  the  major  lineages  of  pan- 
note  mayflies  (Ephemeroptera:  Pannota).  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society 
126:9-101. 

Peters,  W.  L.  and  M.  T.  Gillies.  1991.  The  male  imago  of  Protobehningia  Tshernova  from  Thai- 
land (Ephemeroptera:  Behningiidae).  pp.  207-216.  //;,  J.  Alba-Tercedor  and  A.  Sanchez-Ortega 
(Editors).  Overview  and  strategies  of  Ephemeroptera  and  Plecoptera.  Sandhill  Crane  Press. 
Gainesville,  Florida,  U.S.A.  588  pp. 

Scott,  D.  C.,  L.  Berner,  and  A.  Hirsch.  1959.  The  nymph  of  the  mayfly  genus  Tortopus 
(Ephemeroptera:  Polymitarcyidae).  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  52:  205- 
213. 

Sinitshenkova,  N.  D.  2000.  New  Jersey  amber  mayflies:  the  first  North  American  Mesozoic  mem- 
bers of  the  order  (Insecta;  Ephemeroptera).  pp.  1 1 1-125.  In,  D.  Grimaldi  (Editor).  Studies  on  fos- 
sils in  amber,  with  particular  reference  to  the  Cretaceous  of  New  Jersey.  Backhuys  Publishers. 
Leiden,  The  Netherlands.  498  pp. 

Tshernova,  O.  A.  1977.  Unusual  new  larval  mayflies  (Ephemeroptera:  Palingeniidae,  Behningi- 
idae) from  the  Jura  Mountains  area  of  the  Transbaykal.  Paleontolologicheskiy  Zhurnal  1977(2): 
91-96. 

Tshernova,  O.  A.  and  O.  Bajkova.  1960.  On  a  new  genus  of  mayflies  (Ephemeroptera: 
Behningiidae).  Entomological  Revue  (USSR)  39:  410-416. 

Tsui,  P.  T.  P.  and  M.  D.  Hubbard.  1979.  Feeding  habits  of  the  predaceous  nymphs  of  Dolania 
americana  in  northwestern  Florida  (Ephemeroptera:  Behningiidae).  Hydrobiology  67:  119-123. 

Whalley,  P.  E.  S.  and  E.  A.  Jarzembowski.  1985.  Fossil  insects  from  the  lithographic  limestone  of 
Montsech  (late  Jurrasic-early  Cretaceous),  Lerida  Province,  Spain.  Bulletin  of  the  British 
Museum  of  Natural  History  (Geology)  38:  381-412. 

Wiley,  E.  O.  1981.  Phylogenetics:  the  theory  and  practice  of  phylogenetic  systematics.  Wiley,  New 
York,  U.S.A.  439  pp. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 93_ 

NEW  STATE  AND  PROVINCIAL  RECORDS  FOR  NORTH 

AMERICAN  SMALL  MINNOW  MAYFLIES 

(EPHEMEROPTERA:  BAETIDAE)1 

W.  P.  McCafferty,  M.  D.  Meyer,  J.  M.  Webb,  and  Luke  M.  Jacobus2 

ABSTRACT:  New  record  data  are  contributed  for  49  species  of  baetid  mayflies  from  North  America 
north  of  Mexico.  A  total  of  209  newly  documented  locales  constitute  115  new  state  or  provincial 
records  involving  30  USA  states  and  five  Canadian  provinces. 

KEY  WORDS:  New  state,  new  provincial  records,  North  America,  small  minnow  mayflies,  Ephem- 
eroptera,  Baetidae 

As  part  of  the  mayflies  of  North  America  project,  we  are  attempting  to  docu- 
ment complete  ranges  of  the  nearly  700  species  in  the  region.  Most  species  of 
the  family  Baetidae,  or  small  minnow  mayflies,  have  been  especially  poorly  doc- 
umented during  the  approximately  200  years  of  taxonomic  and  faunistic  work  on 
the  mayflies  in  North  America  (see  McCafferty  2001 ),  and  yet  they  are  one  of  the 
most  common  and  important  groups  of  mayflies  in  both  lotic  and  lentic  aquatic 
habitats  (e.g.,  Edmunds  et  al.  1976,  McCafferty  1981).  This  is  due  mainly  to  the 
fact  that  these  particular  mayflies  have  been  historically  difficult  if  not  impossi- 
ble to  identify.  For  example,  it  was  not  until  1979  that  a  number  of  species  began 
to  be  identifiable  in  the  more  commonly  collected  aquatic,  larval  stage  (Morihara 
and  McCafferty  1979).  The  purpose  of  the  present  study  has  been  to  begin  to 
shore  up  this  shortcoming  in  distributional  data,  and  thereby  make  these  species 
more  accessible  for  biogeographic  studies  as  well  as  studies  of  biodiversity  and 
conservation  biology.  As  such,  we  are  able  to  contribute  209  new  locale  records 
involving  49  of  the  122  baetid  species  currently  known  to  occur  in  North  Ameri- 
ca north  of  Mexico.  In  all,  115  new  state  and  provincial  records  are  provided. 

Species  for  which  new  data  are  documented  are  listed  alphabetically.  States 
and  provinces  are  given  in  upper  case.  Most  collection  materials  associated  with 
the  distributional  data  reside  in  the  Purdue  Entomological  Research  Collection; 
any  other  collection  sources  are  indicated  within  brackets  at  the  end  of  a  data 
citation.  Other  collection  sources  include  Arkansas  State  University  [ASU], 
Louisiana  State  University  [LSU],  Illinois  Natural  History  Survey  [INHS],  Uni- 
versity of  Iowa  Hygienic  Laboratory  [UIHL],  Massachusetts  Audubon  Society 
[MAS],  and  the  J.  M.  Webb  personal  collection  [WC].  Life  stages  associated 
with  the  data  are  given  as  (L)  for  larvae  and  (A)  for  adults. 

RECORD  DATA 

Acentrella  ampla  Traver 

New  data.  MASSACHUSETTS,  Franklin  Co,  Colrain  Township,  Green  R.  XI- 17- 1994,  B 
Colburn(L)[MAS].  SOUTH  CAROLINA,  McCormick  Co,  Cedar  Springs  Cr  at  Rt  138.  11-17-1984, 
BC  Kondratieff  (A).  TENNESSEE,  Blount  Co,  Red  Cr,  ca  2  mi  E  Walland,  IV- 1 1  - 1 977,  AR  Brigham. 


1  Received  on  May  27.  2004.  Accepted  on  July  8,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Entomology,  Purdue  University,  West  Lafayette,  Indiana  47905,  U.S.A.  E-mail  of 
WPM:mccaffer(a  purdue.edu. 

Mailed  on  December  21.  2004 


94  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


J  Unzicker  (L);  Cocke  Co,  Cosby  Cr  at  Cosby  entrance  to  GSNP,  V- 17-2001,  CD  &  RP  Randolph, 
LM  Jacobus  (L).  WEST  VIRGINIA,  Pocahontas  Co,  West  Fork  Greenbrier  R  at  Olive  Jet  nr  Durbin, 
IX-03-1979,  SM  Shields  (L). 

Acentrella  insignificans  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  MONTANA,  Blaine  Co,  Milk  R  16  mi  W  Havre  at  US  Hwy  2,  48/35/45  N,  109/21/48 
W,  and  Chouteau  Co,  Eagle  Cr  16  mi  SE  Big  Sandy,  48/03/26  N,  109/48/25  W,  and  Big  Sandy  Cr,  2 
mi  SE  Big  Sandy,  48/09/04  N,  1 10/04/56  W,  VI- 14-2000,  and  Judith  Basin  Co,  Arrow  Cr,  4  mi  N 
Geyser,  47/18/52  N,  110/29/11  W,  VI- 12-2000,  and  Judith  R,  3  mi  W  Hobson  at  C  M  Russel  Mem 
Hwy,  46/59/51  N,  109/55/34  W,  VI- 1 1-2000,  and  Liberty  Co,  Breed  Cr  W  Whitlash  at  Bold  Butte  Rd, 
48/54/28  N,  111/15/28  W,  and  creek  crossing  at  Black  Jack  Rd,  2  mi  N  Mount  Lebanon,  48/53/24  N, 
1 1 1/02/01  W,  VI-1 3-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L);  McCone  Co,  Missouri  R  at  Lewis  &  Clark  Rec 
Area,  8  mi  SE  Wolf  Point  at  St  Rd  13,  48/04/02  N,  105/32/18  W,  VII-27-2002,  WP  McCafferty,  LM 
Jacobus  (L);  Yellowstone  Co,  Pryor  Cr  at  1990,  45/47/56  N,  108/17/36  W,  VI-09-2000,  WP  McCaf- 
ferty et  al.  (L). 

Acentrella  parvula  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  MAINE,  Hancock  Co,  Ellsworth,  VI- 18- 1976,  WP  McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  M 
Minno  (A).  MONTANA,  Blaine  Co,  Milk  R  16  mi  W  Havre  at  US  Hwy  2,  48/35/45  N,  109/21/48  W, 
and  Chouteau  Co,  Marias  R,  at  US  Hwy  87,  S  Loma,  47/55/48  N  110/30/35  W,  VII-27-2002,  WP 
McCafferty,  LM  Jacobus  (L).  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Swain  Co,  Confluence  of  the  Oconoluftee  R  and 
Raven's  Fork,  VIII-28-2001,  at  light  (A).  OKLAHOMA,  Pushmataha  Co,  Panther  Cr  at  Hwy  2,  3.1 
mi  N  Hwy  2-3  jet,  IV- 17- 1993,  DE  Baumgardner  (L).  SOUTH  CAROLINA,  Barnwell  Co,  Steel  Cr, 
nr  confl  Meyers  Br,  111-14-1984,  BC  Kondratieff  (L).  VIRGINIA,  Carroll  Co,  New  R  at  Rt  721 
Bridge,  in  drift,  VIII-02-1976,  JH  Kennedy  (L). 

Remarks.  North  Carolina  data  for  this  species  are  given  here  because  the 
only  other  published  record  of  that  species  in  North  Carolina  (Pescador  et  al. 
1999)  lacked  locale  data. 

Acentrella  turbida  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  ILLINOIS,  McHenry  Co,  Spring  Grove,  VI-04-1938,  Mohr,  Burks  (A)  [INHS]. 
LOUISIANA,  Livingston  Par,  Little  Nutalbany  R,  Albany,  VI-27-1973,  B  Stark  (A).  MONTANA, 
Judith  Basin  Co,  Arrow  Cr  4  mi  N  Geyser,  47/18/52  N,  110/29/11  W,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L); 
Liberty  Co,  creek  crossing  at  Black  Jack  Rd,  2  mi  N  Mount  Lebanon,  48/53/24  N,  1 1 1/02/01  W,  WP 
McCafferty  et  al.  (L,A).  VERMONT,  Windhams  Co,  North  Br,  at  W  edge  of  Wilmington,  VI-20- 
1976,  WP  McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  M  Minno  (A).  YUKON,  Moose  Cr,  VII-3 1-2001,  DW  Parker 

(L)[wq. 

Acerpenna  macdunnoughi  (Ide) 

New  data.  ARKANSAS,  Franklin  Co,  Prairie  Cr  at  St  Hwy  217,  2.2  mi  N  Charleston,  VIII- 15- 
1981,  J.  Huggins  (L).  MASSACHUSETTS,  Berkshire  Co,  Savoy  Township,  Black  Br,  111-25-1995, 
B  Colburn  (A)  [MAS].  MISSISSIPPI,  Itawamba  Co,  Briar  Cr,  at  Hartsell  Rd,  34/19/44  N,  88/12/34 
W,  and  unnamed  stream  at  New  Temple  Rd,  34/20/47  N,  88/15/14  W,  and  Tishomingo  Co,  Little 
Cripple  Deer  Cr,  at  Co  Rd  957,  34/44/01  N,  88/1 1/47  W,  and  Perrywinkle  Cr  at  Co  Rd  995,  34/44/29 
N,  88/09/18  W,  and  Indian  Cr  at  Co  Rd  241  N  luka,  34/51/25  N,  88/11/26  W,  111-18,  19-2004,  JM 
Webb  (L).  PENNSYLVANIA,  Carbon  Co,  Hayes  Cr,  VIII-30-1993,  J  Munro  (L). 

Acerpenna  pygmaea  (Hagen) 

New  data.  MASSACHUSETTS,  Hampshire  Co,  South  Hadley  Township,  Bachelor  Cr,  IX-30- 
1993,  B  Colburn  (A)  [MAS]. 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 95 


Baetis  brunneicolor  McDunnough 

New  data.  MASSACHUSETTS,  Franklin  Co,  Whately  Township,  Jimmy  Nolan  Br,  X-07-1992, 
B  Colburn  (L)  [MAS].  MONTANA,  Big  Horn  Co,  Indian  Cr,  at  BIA  Rd  88,  NW  Rosebud  Battlefield 
St  Prk,  45/16/08/  N,  107/  02/43  W,  VI-08-2000,  and  Liberty  Co,  Breed  Cr  W  Whitlash  at  Gold  Butte 
Rd,  48/54/28  N,  11 1/15/28  W,  VI- 13-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L).  NEW  HAMPSHIRE,  Crafton 
Co,  Hale  Br  at  For  Serv  Rd  nr  Sugarloaf  Campsite,  VI- 16- 1976,  WP  McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  M 
Minno  (L).  OHIO,  Hamilton  Co,  Miami  R  at  New  Baltimore,  IX- 18- 1952  (L). 

Baetis  flavistriga  McDunnough 

New  data.  GEORGIA,  Cherokee  Co,  Town  Cr,  Canton,  VI- 18- 1973,  B  Stark,  G  Vaught  (L); 
Rabun  Co,  Betty's  Cr,  5  mi  W  Dillard,  VI-20-1973,  B  Stark  (L).  MONTANA,  Chouteau  Co, 
Boxelder  Cr  on  BIA  Rd  8,  7  mi  W  Boxelder,  48/18/06  N,  109/53/10  W,  VI- 14-2000,  and  Liberty  Co, 
Breed  Cr,  W  Whitlash  at  Gold  Butte  Rd,  48/54/28  N,  1 1 1/15/28  W,  VI- 13-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et 
al.  (L,A).  NEW  HAMPSHIRE,  Crafton  Co,  Hale  Br  at  For  Serv  Rd  nr  Sugarloaf  Campsite,  VI- 16- 
1976,  WP  McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  M  Minno  (L).  VIRGINIA,  Rappahannock  Co,  Thorton  R, 
Hwy  2,  VI-22-1975,  Baumann,  Stark,  Pine  (L).  VERMONT,  Windhams  Co,  Bill  Br,  nr  Molly  Stark 
St  Prk  on  St  Rd  9,  VI-20-1976,  WP  McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  M.  Minno  (L).  YUKON,  Moose  Cr, 
VII-3 1-2001,  DW  Parker  (L)  [WC]. 

Baetis  intercalaris  McDunnough 

New  data.  MASSACHUSETTS,  Hampshire  Co,  North  AmherstVI-05-1965,  MC  Miller  (A), 
Amherst,  V-30-1941,  LM  Bartlett  (A).  SOUTH  CAROLINA,  Bamwell  Co,  Meyers  Br,  XII-0 1-1984, 
and  Steel  Cr,  nr  confl  of  Meyers  Br,  11-17-1984,  III- 19- 1984,  and  Pen  Br,  XII-01-1984,  and  Steel  Cr 
at  Cypress  Bridge,  X-l  1-1984,  BC  Kondratieff  (L,  A). 

Baetis  notos  Allen  and  Murvosh 

New  data.  OKLAHOMA,  Cherokee  Co,  Spring  Cr,  Teresita,  VII- 14- 15- 1995,  RK  Heth  (L). 

Baetis  pluto  McDunnough 

New  data.  MASSACHUSETTS,  Essex  Co,  Pye  Br,  below  Rt  97  bridge  at  Topsfield,  VI-04- 
1979,  D  Berysten  (L).  NEW  HAMPSHIRE,  Sullivan  Co,  Croydon  Br  N  Grantham,  IX- 13- 1975,  KCS 
(L).  TENNESSEE,  Blount  Co,  Forge  Cr  at  Parsons  Br  Rd,  V- 18-2001,  CD  &  RP  Randolph,  LM 
Jacobus  (L). 

Baetis  rusticans  McDunnough 

New  data.  MASSACHUSETTS,  Berkshire  Co,  Florida  Township,  Smith  Br,  XII-22-1994,  and 
Franklin  Co,  Sunderland  Township,  Mohawk  Br,  V-20-1992,  B  Colburn  (L)  [MAS]. 

Baetis  tricaudatus  Dodds 

New  data.  ARKANSAS,  Fulton  Co,  Spring  R,  V-07-1977,  GL  Harp  (L)  [ASU].  GEORGIA, 
Union  Co,  Nottely  R,  7  mi  S  Blairsville,  VI-20-1973,  B  Stark  (L). 

Callibaetis  californicus  Banks 
New  data.  OKLAHOMA:  Garfield  Co  (L)  (no  other  data). 

Callibaetis  ferrugineus  (Walsh ) 

New  data.  MASSACHUSETTS,  Hamden  Co,  Springfield,  VI-09-1965,  RW  Koss  (A);  Hamp- 
shire Co,  Cushman  Pond,  X-29-1938,  JR  Traver  (L),  and  Amherst,  VI-1 1-1956,  IV-17-1957,  VI-21- 
1957,  VIII-01-1960,  JR  Traver  (A).  MONTANA,  Powder  River  Co,  on  For  Rd  92  (Ten  Mile  Rd), 
45/25/53  N,  106/08/59  W,  VI-08-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (A).  VERMONT,  Waterbury  Stiles 
Pond,  VI-20-1948,  LM  Bartlett  (A). 


96  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Callibaetis  florid  an  us  B  a  n  ks 

New  data.  ARKANSAS,  Crittenden  Co,  Wapanocca  L  nr  observation  platform,  Wapanocca  Natl 
Wildlife  Ref,  IX-09-1978,  and  Mississippi  Co.  Big  L  nr  shore,  Big  Lake  Nat.  Wildlife  Ref,  IX-02- 
1978,  J  Rettig  (L)  [ASU].  KENTUCKY,  Hopkins  Co,  Flat  Cr,  5.2  km  E  Pennyrile  Pkwy,  6.8  km  S 
Anton,  VIII-06-1980  (L).  MARYLAND,  Frederick  Co,  Potamac  R,  point  of  rocks,  1  mi  above  Rt  15, 
VIII-24-1965,  and  Montgomery  Co,  Potamac  R,  4  mi  below  mouth  of  Monocacy  R,  and  Potamac  R 
at  Whites  Ferry,  VIII-26-1965,  JW  Richardson  (L). 

Callibaetis  fluctuam  (Walsh) 

New  data.  ARKANSAS,  Craighead  Co,  rice  field  nr  Cache  R,  4  mi  W  Bono,  VIII-13-1980  (A). 
OKLAHOMA,  Garfield  Co,  X-10-1964,  and  11-18-1965,  RC  Harrel  (L). 

Callibaetis  pallidus  Banks 

New  data.  MINNESOTA,  Polk  Co,  Crookston,  VIII-27-1956,  GF  Edmunds  (A).  MONTANA, 
Chouteau  Co,  cattle  tank  1  mi  NE  Big  Lake,  47/40  N.  1 10/24  W,  VI- 12-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al. 
(L).  WISCONSIN,  Dane  Co,  Madison,  VII-08-1912,  and  VII-01-1916,  and  V- 1941,  and  IV-30-1949, 
and  VI-30-1952,  and  VI-1956  (A).  YUKON,  Alaska  Hwy,  Mile  Post  660,  VII-01-1952  (A). 

Callibaetis  pretiosus  Banks 

New  data.  ARKANSAS,  Calhoun  Co,  Locust  Bayou  at  St  Hwy  4,  12  mi  W  Hampton,  IV-25- 
1977,  HW  Robison,  and  Lafayette  Co,  small  pond  behind  brick  residence,  1  mi  E  Stamps  at  St  Hwy 
82,  1-26-1991,  J  Nichols  (L)  [ASU].  INDIANA,  Bartholemew  Co,  farm  pond  1.5  mi  E  Waymans- 
ville,  VII-02-1999,  LM  Jacobus  (L).  LOUISIANA,  Calcasieu  Par,  Sam  Houston  St  Prk,  Lake 
Charles,  VIII- 14- 1963  (A). 

Callibaetis  skokianus  Needham 

New  data.  WISCONSIN,  Dane  Co,  Madison,  VII-08-1916,  JG  Sanders,  and  VI-03-1929,  MH 
Doner  (A);  Door  Co,  Sturgeon  Bay,  VII-29-1957,  RL  Giese  (A). 

Centroptilum  alamance  (Traver) 

New  data.  ILLINOIS,  Pope  Co,  Lusk  Cr,  1.82  km  NE  Waltersburg,  VI-26-1997,  and  Golconda, 
IV-03-1946,  and  Herod,  111-14-1946  [INHS]. 

Centroptilum  album  McDunnough 

New  data.  OKLAHOMA,  Cherokee  Co,  Spring  Cr,  Timberlake  Ranch,  V-01-1997,  RK  Heth  (L). 

Centroptilum  bifurcatum  McDunnough 

New  data.  INDIANA,  Bartholemew  Co,  White  Cr,  S  Rd  930S,  V- 19-2000,  LM  Jacobus  (L). 
IOWA,  Winnesheik  Co,  Canoe  Cr,  Decorah,  IX-09-2003,  T  Hubbard  (L)  [UIHL].  KANSAS,  Douglas 
Co,  Kansas  R,  at  Eudora  bridge,  VIII-24-1978,  P  Liechti  (L)  [KU].  MONTANA,  Chouteau  Co, 
Shonkin  Cr,  .5  mi  W  Shonkin,  47/37/35  N,  1 10/34/53  W,  VI- 12-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L);  Hill 
Co,  Milk  R  at  St.  John's  bridge,  VII-31-1999,  JM  Webb  (L)  [WC];  Wheatland  Co,  Musselshell  R,  at 
US  Hwy  191  Harlowton,  46/25/44  N,  109/50/30  W,  VI-10-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L)  . 

Centroptilum  conturbatum  McDunnough 

New  data.  MONTANA,  Blaine  Co,  Milk  R,  16  mi  W  Havre  at  US  Hwy  2,48/35/45  N,  109/21/48 
W,  VI-14-2000,  and  Chouteau  Co,  Highwood  Cr,  3  mi  S  Highwood,  47/33/04  N  110/46/38  W,  VI- 
12-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L);  Richland  Co,  Missouri  R  at  St  Rd  16,  SE  Culbertson,  48/07/21 
N,  104/28/32  W,  VII-27-2002,  WP  McCafferty,  LM  Jacobus  (L).  WISCONSIN,  Trempealeau  Co, 
Black  R,  above  Hwy  35,  VII-16-1991,  RA  Lillie  (L). 


Vol.  115.  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004 97 


Centroptilum  minor  McDunnough 

New  data.  MAINE,  Franklin  Co,  Carr  R,  at  Rt  16,  W  North  Anson,  VI-2 1-1986  (L). 

Centroptilum  rufrostrigatum  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  OHIO,  Geauga  Co,  Kirtland,  VIII-31-1942,  and  Lake  Co,  Willoughby,  IX-04-1942, 
JRTraver(A). 

Centroptilum  triangulifer  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  INDIANA,  Perry  Co,  Poison  Cr,  ca  5  mi  NW  Derby,  V- 19- 1977,  M  Minno,  S  Yocuin 
(L).  KENTUCKY,  Breathitt  Co,  Canoe  Cr,  3.7  km  S  KY  30  at  mouth,  and  Carter  Co,  Tygarts  Cr  at 
jet  KY  1662  &  US  60,  IV- 17- 1978,  and  Elliot  Co,  Little  Fork  Little  Sandy  R  at  jet  KY  486  &  Wallow 
Hole  Cr  Rd,  .6  km  NE  Culver,  VI-26-1978,  and  Fleming  Co,  Fox  Cr  at  Big  Run  Rd  bridge,  .2  km 
NW  Big  Run  Rd-KY  1013  jet,  VII-20-1983,  and  Knott  Co,  Laurel  Fork,  0.9  mi  SE  on  KY  1098  from 
jet  with  KY  160,  VI-20-1978,  and  Lewis  Co,  Kinniconick  Cr  67  m  up  stream  from  Indian  Cr  con- 
fluence, .4  km  ESE  KY  344-377  jet,  VII-22-1983,  and  Morgan  Co,  Caney  Cr,  2.9  km  N  KY  2498 
from  jet  with  US  460,  VI-29-1978,  and  Rowan  Co,  North  Fork  Triplert  Cr,  5.7  km  NNE  on  KY  377 
from  jet  with  KY  32  (L).  OHIO,  Lake  Co,  KirtlandIX-02-1942,  JRTraver(A).  WISCONSIN,  Burnett 
Co,  St.  Croix  R,  Norway  Point  Landing,  VI-1 1-1991,  RA  Lillie  (L);  Monroe  Co,  Squaw  Lake,  Fort 
McCoy,  VI 1 1-06-1 98 1,  AV  Provonsha  (L). 

Centroptilum  victoriae  McDunnough 

New  data.  ALBERTA,  Pembino  R,  53/39  N.  115,00  W,  IX-18-no  year,  J  Ciborowski  (L,A). 
MONTANA,  Big  Horn  Co,  Indian  Cr,  at  B1A  88,  NW  Rosebud  Battlefield  St  Prk,  45/16/08  N, 
107/02/43  W,  VI-08-2000,  and  Elaine  Co,  Milk  R,  16  mi  W  Havre  at  US  Hwy  2,  48/35/45  N, 
109/21/48  W,  VI- 14-2000,  and  Chouteau  Co,  Shonkin  Cr  .5  mi  W  Shonkin,  47/37/35  N,  110/34/53 
W,  VI- 12-2000,  and  Eagle  Cr,  16  mi  SE  Big  Sandy,  48/03/26  N,  109/48/25  W,  VI- 14-2000,  and  Judith 
Basin  Co,  Judith  R,  3  mi  W  Hobson  at  C.  M.  Russel  Mem  Hwy,  46/59/51  N,  109/55/34  W,  WP 
McCafferry  et  al.  (L).  WISCONSIN,  Dunn  Co,  Chippewa  R,  Pature  Island  access,  VI-03-1993,  and 
Marathon  Co,  Eau  Claire  R,  Dells  Prk,  VI- 10- 1992,  and  Rusk  Co,  Jump  R,  at  Sheldon,  VI- 17- 1992, 
RA  Lillie  (L). 

Cloeon  dipterum  (Linnaeus) 

New  data.  ALASKA,  Valdez-Cordova  Co,  Lake  Mentasta,  Glen  Hwy  MP282,  VIII- 12- 1954,  CP 
Alexander  (A).MICHIGAN,  Oakland  Co,  7  km  SW  Milford,  IV-03-1988  (L,A). 

Diphetor  hageni  (Eaton) 
New  data.  NEW  HAMPSHIRE,  Sullivan  Co,  Grantham  at  light,  V-10-1980  (A). 

Fallceon  quilleri  (Dodds) 

New  data.  MONTANA,  Richland  Co,  Missouri  R  at  St  Rd  16,  SE  Culbertson,  48/07/21  N, 
104/28/32  W,  VII-27-2002,  WP  McCafferty,  LM  Jacobus  (L);  Yellowstone  Co.  Perry  Cr  at  190, 
45/47/56  N,  108/17/36  W,  VI-09-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L). 

Heterocloeon  anoka  (Daggy) 

New  data.  IOWA,  Mitchell  Co,  Deer  Cr,  43/25/32  N,  93/01/27  W,  and  Rock  Cr  at  Rock  Creek, 
VIII-21-2001,  and  Worth  Co,  Willow  Cr  nr  Hanlontown,  IX-04-2001  (L)  [UIHL].  MANITOBA, 
Valley  R  at  Hwy  5,  and  Wilson  R  at  Hwy  10,  VI-08-2000,  JM  Webb  (L)  [WC].  OKLAHOMA, 
Pushmataha  Co,  Kiamichi  R  at  Hwy  2,  16.3  mi  N  Hwy  2-3  jet,  16  mi  N  Antlers.  V'II-16-1993,  DE 
Baumgardner  (L).  PENNSYLVANIA,  Lacawanna  Co,  Scranton,  Summer  1945.  HK  Tovvnes  (L). 
SASKATCHEWAN,  Montreal  R,  at  Hwy  2,  VIH-08-2000.  and  Overflowing  R  at  Hwy  9,  VII-09- 
2000,  and  Red  Deer  R  at  Hudson  Bay  Reg  Prk,  VII- 19-2000,  and  South  Saskatchewan  R  at  Clarkboro 


98  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Ferry,  VII- 16-2000,  and  at  Lemsford  Ferry,  IX- 16-2000,  and  at  Queen  Elizabeth  Power  Stat  VI-02- 
2000,  and  Waskesiu  R  at  Hwy  2,  VII-06-2000,  and  Weyakwin  R  at  Hwy  2,  VII-07-2000,  JM  Webb 
(L)  [WC];  Torch  R  at  Hwy  35,  and  Whitefox  R,  at  Hwy  35,  VII-02-1986,  V  Keeler  (L)  [WC];  Battle 
R,  bridge  S  Washburn,  VIII-27-1972,  DH  Smith  (L)  [WC]. 

Remarks.  The  present  recognition  and  generic  disposition  of  this  species  is 
being  elaborated  elsewhere  by  R.  D.  Waltz  and  WPM;  however,  it  first  appeared 
as  given  here  in  Webb  and  McCafferty  (2004). 

Paracloeodes  minutus  (Daggy) 
New  data.  LOUISIANA,  Lasalle  Par,  Trout  Cr  at  White  Sulphur  Springs,  VIII-25-1973  (L)  [LSU]. 

Plauditus  bimaculatus  (Berner) 

New  data.  LOUISIANA,  Washington  Par,  Silver  Cr,  6  mi  NE  Franklinton,  V-05-1974  (A) 
[LSU]. 

Plauditus  cestus  (Provonsha  and  McCafferty) 

New  data.  GEORGIA,  Rabun  Co,  Betty's  Cr,  5  mi  W  Dillard,  VI-20-1973,  B  Stark  (L).  MANI- 
TOBA, Valley  R  at  Hwy  5,  VI-08-2000,  and  Shell  R,  at  Hwy  5,  VI-09-2000,  JM  Webb  (L)  [WC]. 

Plauditus  dubius  (Walsh) 

New  data.  MONTANA,  Teton  Co,  Teton  R,  300M  E  overpass  on  115,  32  mi  N  Great  Falls, 
47/55/27  N  1 1 1/43/38  W,  VI-13-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L). 

Plauditus  gloveri  McCafferty  and  Waltz 

New  data.  MANITOBA,  Shell  R  at  Hwy  5,  VI-09-2000,  and  Valley  R  at  Hwy  5,  VI-08-2000,  JM 
Webb  (L)  [WC].  MONTANA,  Blaine  Co,  Milk  R,  16  mi  W  Havre  at  US  Hwy  2,  48/35/45  N, 
109/21/48  W,  VI-14-2000,  and  Chouteau  Co,  Big  Sandy  Cr,  2  mi  SE  Big  Sandy,  48/09/04  N, 
110/04/56  W,  VI-14-2000,  and  Liberty  Co,  Breed  Cr,  W  Whitlash  at  Gold  Butte  Rd,  48/54/28  N, 
1 1 1/15/28  W,  VI-13-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L). 

Plauditus  punctiventris  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  NEW  JERSEY,  Monmouth  Co,  Shark  Cr,  Shark  Cr  County  Park,  V- 17-2001,  MD 
Meyer  (L). 

Plauditus  texanus  Wiersema 

New  data.  OKLAHOMA,  Pushmataha  Co,  Panther  Cr,  at  Hwy  2,  3.1  mi  N  Hwy  2-3  jet,  IV-17- 
1993,  DE  Baumgardner  (L),  and  Terrapin  Cr,  III- 17- 1994  (L). 

Plauditus  virilis  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  MANITOBA,  Pine  R  at  Hwy  10,  and  Valley  R  at  Hwy  5,  VI-08-2000,  JM  Webb  (L) 
[WC].  MONTANA,  Judith  Basin  Co,  Judith  R,  3  mi  W  Hobsonat  C.  M.  Russel  Mem  Hwy,  46/59/51 
N,  109/55/34  W,  VI-1 1-2000.  WP  McCafferty  (L).  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Swain  Co,  Confluence 
Oconaluftee  R  and  Raven's  Fork,  VI-18-,  VII-16-,  VIII-16,28-2001,  and  Oconaluftee  R  under  Blue 
Ridge  Parkway  overpass,  at  light  (A).  OKLAHOMA,  McCurtain  Co,  Silver  Cr,  III- 18- 1994  (L). 
PENNSYLVANIA,  Mifflin  Co,  Mifflin  Co,  Reedsville,  VI- 18- 1948  [INHS]. 

Pro cloeon  fragile  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  CONNECTICUT,  New  Haven  Co,  Mt.  Carmel,  X-20-1947,  RM  &  AH  Sommerman 
(A)  [INHS].  MAINE,  Franklin  Co,  Oquossoc,  VII-15,27-no  year,  N  Banks  (A). 


Vol.  115,  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004 99 


Procloeon  pennulatum  (Eaton) 

New  data.  MONTANA,  Hill  Co,  Milk  R  at  St.  John's  bridge,  VII-3 1-1999,  JM  Webb(L)  [WC]. 
NEVADA,  Elko  Co,  Humbolt  R,  Elko,  VI1I-29-1965,  SL  Jensen  (L).  WISCONSIN,  Oconto  Co, 
Oconto  R,  Hwy  88,  VII-15-1992,  and  Sauk  Co,  Otter  Cr,  turnaround,  VII-21-1993,  slow  run,  VI-22- 

1992,  RALillie(L). 

Procloeon  quaesitum  (McDunnough) 
New  data.  NOVA  SCOTIA:  Annapolis  R,  VI-25-1950  (L). 

Procloeon  rubropictum  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  NEW  HAMPSHIRE,  Windhams  Co,  Whetstone  Br,  nr  Battleboro,  VI- 19- 1976,  WP 
McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  M.  Minnow  (L).  PENNSYLVANIA,  Carbon  Co,  Hayes  Cr,  VIII-30- 

1993,  J  Munro(L). 

Procloeon  rufrostrigatum  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  ILLINOIS,  Kankakee  Co,  Kankakee,  VII-10-1925  [INHS];  Vermilion  Co,  Oakwood, 
VII-30-1939  [INHS].  OHIO,  Lake  Co,  Willoughby,  VII-10-1939,  and  VII-22-1942,  JR  Traver  (A). 
WISCONSIN,  Burnett  Co,  St  Croix  R,  VI- 16- 1992,  and  Marathon  Co,  Eau  Claire  R,  VI- 10- 1992,  and 
Oconto  Co,  Oconto  R,  Hwy  BB,  VII-15-1992,  and  Waupaca  Co,  Embarrass  R,  Behnke  Rd,  VII- 14- 
1992,  RA  Lillie  (L);  Washburn  Co,  Totogatic  R  at  Minong,  IX-03-1939  [INHS]. 

Procloeon  simplex  (McDunnough) 

New  data.  ARKANSAS,  Independence  Co,  West  Lafferty  Cr,  4  mi  W  Cushman,  X-2 1-1978  (L) 
[ASU].  WISCONSIN,  Burnett  Co,  St.  Croix  R,  Norway  Point  Landing,  VI-1 1-1991,  RA  Lillie  (L); 
Washburn  Co,  Kimball  Lake  at  Minong,  VIII-25-1945  [INHS]. 

Procloeon  viridoculare  (Berner) 

New  data.  LOUISIANA,  Catahoula  Par,  Grant  Par,  Fish  Cr,  Pollock,  VI-28-1973,  B  Stark  (L). 
MONTANA,  Powder  River  Co,  Little  Powder  R  at  US  Hwy  212,  45/22/26  N,  105/18/07  W,  VI-08- 
2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L).  OKLAHOMA,  Garfield  Co,  Otter  Cr,  VIII-04-1964,  RC  Harrel  (L), 
and  Latimer  Co,  Red  Oak  Cr,  5  mi  SE  Red  Oak,  VI-08-1973,  B  Stark  (L). 

Remarks.  The  Oklahoma  records  for  P.  viridoculare  are  given  here  because 
no  detailed  locale  data  appeared  with  the  only  other  published  record  of  this 
species  from  Oklahoma  (Wiersema  and  McCafferty  2004). 

Pseudocentroptiloides  usa  Waltz  and  McCafferty 

New  data.  WISCONSIN,  Burnett  Co,  St.  Croix  R,  Hwy  70.  VI- 16- 1992,  Seven  Island  area.  VII- 
17-1991,  and  Columbia  Co,  Wisconsin  R,  below  Portage,  VII- 12- 1991,  and  Grant  Co,  Wisconsin  R, 
Millerville,  VIM  1-1991,  and  Green  Co,  Sugar  R,  Hwy  11-81,  VI-06-1992,  and  Rock  Co,  Sugar  R, 
Nelson  Rd,  VI-06-1 992,  and  Sauk  Co,  Honey  Cr,  above  Hsy  60,  VII-20- 1 99 1 ,  and  Shawano  Co,  Wolf 
R.  Hwy  CCC,  VII-15-1992,  and  Waupaca  Co,  Embarrass  R,  Behnke  Rd,  V1I-14-1992,  and  Wolf  R, 
above  Rey  Rd,  VI-09-1992,  RA  Lillie  (L). 

Pseudocloeon  dardanum   (McDunnough) 

New  data.  MINNESOTA,  Grant  Co,  Mustinka  R  at  St  Rd  9,  1  mi  NW  Norcross.  45/53  13  N, 
96/12/49  W,  VII-25-2002,  WP  McCafferty,  LM  Jacobus  (L,A).  MONTANA,  Blaine  Co,  Milk  R.  16 
mi  W  Havre  at  US  Hwy  2,  48/35/48  N,  109/21/48  W,  VI- 14-2000,  WP  McCafferty  et  al.  (L,A  );  Milk 
R  at  Fort  Belknap  at  US  2,  48/29/18  N,  108/45/40  W,  and  McCone  Co,  Missouri  R  at  Lewis  &  Clark 
Rec  Area,  8  mi  SE  Wolf  Point  at  ST  Rd  13,  48/04/02  N,  105/32/18  W,  and  Richland  Co,  Missouri  R 
at  St  Rd  16,  SE  Culbertson,  48/07/21  N,  104/28/32  W,  VII-27-2002,  WP  McCafferty,  LM  Jacobus 


100  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


(L);  Hill  Co,  Milk  R  at  St.  John's  bridge,  VII-3 1-1999,  JM  Webb  (L)  [WC].  SOUTH  CAROLINA, 
Kershaw  Co,  Wateree  R,  100  ft  S  U.S  #1  at  bridge,  IX-04-1966,  JW  Richardson  (L). 

Remarks.  The  South  Carolina  record  is  significant  in  that  it  extends  the 
known  range  of  this  species  into  the  southeastern  region  of  North  America.  Lar- 
vae of  this  species  were  described  by  Soluk  ( 1981 ),  at  which  time  the  species  was 
thought  to  be  primarily  western.  Thus,  the  much-used  larval  key  to  species  of 
North  American  baetine  mayflies  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979)  did  not 
include  the  species,  and  any  larvae  of  P.  dardanum  would  have  been  keyed  to 
P.  ephippiatum  (Traver)  prior  to  the  appearance  of  the  McCafferty  and  Waltz 
(1995)  key,  which  incorporated  P.  dardanum  larvae  for  the  first  time.  Since  1995, 
several  records  of  P.  dardanum  have  been  confirmed  from  the  Midwest  (Ran- 
dolph and  McCafferty  1998),  and  larval  records  of  P.  ephippiatum  from  the  East 
must  now  be  reevaluated  using  the  McCafferty  and  Waltz  ( 1 995 )  key. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

For  their  various  contributions  to  the  study  by  way  of  specimen  donations  and  loans,  data  shar- 
ing, or  identification  assistance,  we  would  like  to  thank  Dave  Baumgardner,  Betsy  Colburn,  Ed 
Dewalt,  George  Edmunds,  George  Harp,  Kip  Heth,  Boris  Kondratieff,  Ellis  Laudermilk,  Dick  Lillie, 
Pat  Randolph,  Jay  Richardson,  Bill  Stark,  Lu  Sun,  Bob  Waltz,  and  Nick  Wiersema.  This  study  was 
conducted  as  part  of  the  Mayflies  of  North  America  Project  supported  in  part  by  NSF  grant  DEB- 
9901577. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Edmunds,  G.  F.,  S.  L.  Jensen,  and  L.  Berner.  1976.  The  mayflies  of  North  and  Central  America. 
University  of  Minnesota  Press.  Minneapolis,  Minnesota,  U.S.A.  330  pp. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  1981.  Aquatic  Entomology.  Science  Books  International.  Boston,  Massachu- 
setts, U.S.A.,  448  pp. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  200 1 .  The  gentle  quest:  200  years  in  search  of  North  American  mayflies,  pp.  2 1  - 
35.  In:  E.  Dominguez  (Editor).  Trends  in  research  in  Ephemeroptera  and  Plecoptera.  Kluwer 
Academic/Plenum  Publisher,  New  York,  NY,  U.S.A.  478  pp. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  and  R.  D.  Waltz.  1995.  Labiobaetis  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae):  new  status, 
new  North  American  species,  and  related  new  genus.  Entomological  News  106:  19-28. 

Morihara,  D.  K.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1979.  The  Baetis  larvae  of  North  America  (Ephe- 
meroptera: Baetidae).  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  105:  139-221. 

Pescador,  M.  L.,  D.  R.  Lenat,  and  M.  D.  Hubbard.  1999.  Mayflies  (Ephemeroptera)  of  North 
Carolina  and  South  Carolina:  an  update.  Florida  Entomologist  82:  316-332. 

Randolph,  R.  P.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1998.  Diversity  and  distribution  of  the  mayflies 
(Ephemeroptera)  of  Illinois,  Indiana,  Kentucky,  Michigan,  Ohio,  and  Wisconsin.  Ohio  Biological 
Survey  Bulletin,  New  Series  1 3  ( 1 ): vii  +  1-188. 

Soluk,  D.  A.  1981.  The  larva  of  Baetis  ikinhtints  McDunnough  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae).  Ento- 
mological News  92:  147-151. 

Webb,  J.  M.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  2004.  New  records  of  mayflies  (Ephemeroptera)  from  Alberta, 
Canada,  Entomological  News  114(4):  230-232. 

Wiersema,  N.  A.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  2004.  New  specific  synonyms  and  records  of  North 
American  Centroptilum  and  Procloeon  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae).  Entomological  News  115(3), 
in  press. 


Vol.  115,  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 101 

TITSONA  TWA  CHAMBERLIN,  1962,  A  SYNONYM  OF 

CHONEIULUS  PALMATUS  (NEMEC,  1895) 

(DIPLOPODA:  JULIDA:  BLANIULIDAE),  WITH 

NEW  NORTH  AMERICAN  LOCALITY  RECORDS' 

Rowland  M.  Shelley2  and  Henrik  Enghoff 

ABSTRACT:  The  unlabeled  syntypes  of  the  milliped,  Titsona  tida  Chamberlin,  1962,  collected  at  Mer- 
cury, Nye  County,  Nevada,  exist  in  the  microscope  slide  collection  at  the  National  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  DC.  They  comprise  a  fragmented  female  of  Choneiulus 
palmatus  (Nemec,  1895)  (Julida:  Blaniulidae)  and  the  severely  distorted  anterior  segments  of,  appar- 
ently, a  female  callipodidan,  which,  on  a  geographical  basis,  is  probably  Colactis  utorum  (Chamberlin, 
1925)  (Schizopetalidae).  As  an  antenna  of  the  former  species  has  been  dissected  and  mounted,  a  draw- 
ing of  such  being  the  only  illustration  accompanying  the  description,  and  other  aspects  of  this  account 
pertain  to  C.  palmatus,  we  designate  the  blaniulid  as  the  lectotype  of  T.  tida  and  place  the  name  in  syn- 
onymy under  C.  palmatus,  one  of  five  European  blaniulids  that  have  been  introduced  into  North 
America  and  occur  here  primarily  in  urban  biotopes.  Unpublished  localities  of  C.  palmatus  from  Canada 
and  the  United  States  are  reported  including  the  first  from  Quebec,  Connecticut,  Illinois,  Maryland, 
Minnesota,  South  Dakota,  and  Utah.  A  confirmatory  illustration  of  two  midbody  segments  of  the  lecto- 
type shows  the  diagnostic  setae  of  C.  palmatus  that  occur  along  the  caudal  pleurotergal  margins. 

KEY  WORDS:  Tisona  tida,  Choneiulus  palmatus,  Diplopoda,  Julida,  Blaniulidae,  new  locality  records, 
Canada,  U.S.A.,  Holarctic,  introduced  millipede 

In  his  final  publication  on  millipeds,  R.  V.  Chamberlin  (1962)  described  three 
new  species  from  Mercury,  Nye  County,  Nevada,  a  small  military  community  in  the 
Nuclear  Testing  Area  of  the  northern  Mojave  Desert,  one  of  the  most  arid  environ- 
ments in  the  United  States.  The  last  account,  and  hence  Chamberlin's  final  milliped 
description,  was  the  proposal  of  Titsona  tida  n.  sp.  for  two  individuals  of  unspeci- 
fied sexes  collected  in  March  1960,  a  purported  representative  of  the  family  Cam- 
balidae  (then  called  "Leioderidae"),  order  Spirostreptida,  which  is  primarily  known 
from  relatively  moist  environments  in  California  and  Oregon  west  of  the  Sierra 
Nevada  and  Cascade  Mountains,  the  Rocky  Mountains  and  vicinity  from  Idaho  to 
New  Mexico,  caves  in  Texas,  and  the  forested  biome  that  extends  from  eastern 
Texas  to  the  Atlantic  Coastal  Plain  (Loomis  1938;  Chamberlin  and  Hoffman  1958; 
Shelley  1979,  1981;  Hoffman  1980,  1999;  Jeekel  2004).  The  type  and  only  previ- 
ously known  species,  T.  sima  Chamberlin,  1912,  occurs  in  Yolo  and  Butte  counties, 
California,  in  the  first  region  above  and  some  370  mi  (592  km)  northwest  of 
Mercury  (Chamberlin  1912,  Chamberlin  and  Hoffman  1958,  Buckett  1964,  Hoff- 
man 1999,  Shelley  2002a),  so  the  species  inhabit  strikingly  different  environments. 
By  itself,  Chamberlin's  description  of  T.  tida  provides  nothing  useful  to  ascertain  its 


1  Received  on  June  8,  2004.  Accepted  on  August  22,  2004. 

2  Research  Laboratory,  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  4301  Reedy  Creek  Road, 
Raleigh.  North  Carolina  27607  U.S.A.  E-mail:  rowland.shelley(«  ncmail.net. 

'Natural  History  Museum  of  Denmark,  University  of  Copenhagen,  Universitetsparken  15,  DK.-2100 
Copenhagen,  Denmark.  E-mail:  hcnghoffta  zmuc.ku.dk. 

Mailed  on  December  21.  2004 


1 02  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


identity,  and  the  only  illustration  is  a  meaningless  drawing  of  an  antenna  without 
setae.  As  noted  by  Hoffman  (1999),  "There  is  no  way  to  deduce  from  the  descrip- 
tion what  this  taxon  represents,"  so  the  enigmatic  name,  "T.  tida,  "  has  been  car- 
ried in  the  literature  for  43  years,  most  recently  being  cited  by  Jeekel  (2004). 

According  to  Chamberlin  (1962),  the  types  of  T.  tida  were  deposited  in  his  per- 
sonal collection,  which  was  transferred  to  the  National  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  DC  (NMNH),  in  1972,  after  his 
death  in  November  1967,  and  Hoffman  (1999)  subsequently  reported  that  the  male 
holotype  is  at  this  institution  even  though  Chamberlin  did  not  mention  sexes  in  the 
original  description.  However,  T.  tida  is  not  included  in  the  NMNH  list  of  milliped 
types,  and  the  specimens  are  not  present  in  their  type  collection,  as  RMS  searched 
for  them  in  March  2004  without  success.  A  topotype  would  thus  seem  necessary 
to  clarify  this  name,  but  finding  any  millipeds  in  the  desert  at  Mercury  would  be 
difficult,  and  with  Chamberlin 's  meaningless  description,  there  is  the  added  prob- 
lem of  recognizing  the  species  in  the  first  place.  Consequently,  the  destiny  of  T. 
tida  would  seem  to  be  the  nomen  dubium  or  nomen  inquirendum  categories. 

In  addition  to  the  NMNH's  alcoholic  or  "wet"  myriapod  holdings  (both  types 
and  non-types),  there  is  also  a  collection  of  microscopic  slides  with  specimens  of 
millipeds  and  centipedes,  and  parts  thereof,  that  were  permanently  mounted  by 
researchers  in  the  past.  These  slides  have  been  generally  ignored  and  their  contents 
are  unknown;  RMS  searched  through  them  in  2004  for  a  missing  centipede  type 
and  unexpectedly  discovered  two  labeled  "Titsona  tida.  "  The  only  other  markings 
on  the  slide  tags  are  "Ref.  93"  on  one  and  "Ref.  56"  on  the  other,  whose  meanings 
are  unknown;  the  locality  is  not  mentioned  nor  are  they  labeled  as  "Types." 
However,  we  know  of  no  other  samples  anywhere  in  the  world  identified  as  this 
species,  and  the  slides  contain  two  fragmented  females  with  a  separate  antenna 
dissected  from  one,  logically  that  drawn  by  Chamberlin  (1962).  We  therefore  con- 
sider these  individuals  as  the  syntypes  of  T.  tida  that  were  never  marked  as  such. 
Both  mounts  are  in  poor  condition  with  numerous  bubbles  in  the  medium  beneath 
the  coverslips.  Milliped  fragments  extend  through  these  bubbles  and  are  difficult 
to  discern,  even  under  high  power  on  a  compound  microscope,  because  of  distor- 
tions by  the  surface  films  and  meniscuses  of  the  medium  between  the  bubbles.  The 
contents  of  these  slides  are  as  follows: 

Slide  marked  "Ref.  93":  The  dissected  antenna  and  a  fragment  containing  the 
head  and  ca.  21  segments  of  a  female  of  the  family  Blaniulidae  (order  Julida)  pos- 
sessing a  row  of  long  setae  dorsally  and  dorsolaterally  along  the  caudal  margin  of 
each  pleurotergite  (Fig.  1). 

Slide  marked  "Ref.  56":  One  segment,  oriented  in  caudal  profile  view,  and  two 
fragments  of  the  same  individual  as  evidenced  by  the  long  setae.  One  fragment 
contains  ca.  16  midbody  segments,  and  the  other  is  the  caudal  end  with  around  13 
segments.  The  segments  are  difficult  to  distinguish  because  of  distortions  from  the 
bubbles  and  intervening  strands  of  medium,  so  counts  are  only  approximations, 
but  the  milliped  has  around  5 1  total  segments.  Also  on  this  slide  are  the  head  and 
around  12  segments  of  the  anterior  end  of  another  milliped  that  is  severely  dis- 


Vol.  115,  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 


103 


torted  but  clearly  does  not  have  segmental  setae.  It  appears  to  be  a  callipodidan  and 
is  logically  Colactis  utorum  (Chamberlin,  1925)  (Schizopetalidae),  which  occurs 
to  the  east  and  west,  in  Lincoln  County,  Nevada,  and  Inyo  County,  California 
(Shelley  1996). 


Fig.  1   Two  midbody  segments  of  the  lectotype  of  Titsona  tida  showing  the  pleurotergal 
setae  and  defense  glands,  drawn  at  200x. 


As  the  dissected  antenna  corresponds  to  that  drawn  by  Chamberlin  (1962:55, 
fig.  6),  we  designate  the  blaniulid  as  the  lectotype  of  T.  tida.  According  to 
Chamberlin,  the  body  in  life  was  light  brown  with  conspicuous  defense  glands  lat- 
erally on  each  segment,  which  are  visible  on  the  slides  as  vaguely  "heart-shaped" 
structures;  there  are  also  five  ocelli  arranged  linearly  on  each  side  of  the  head  with 
the  medialmost  significantly  smaller.  Coupled  with  the  long  pleurotergal  setae 
(Fig.  1),  these  features  are  precisely  those  of  Choneiulus  palmatus  (Nemec,  1895), 
illustrated  by  Schubart  (1934:188,  fig.  298),  Jeekel  (1953,  fig.  19),  Enghoff  and 
Shelley  ( 1 979:67,  fig.  3),  and  Blower  (1985:111,  fig.  34A),  and  the  roughly  5 1  seg- 
ments of  the  lectotype  correlate  with  the  maximum  of  58  segments  on  females 
reported  by  Enghoff  (1984).  Choneiulus  palmatus  is  a  native  Palearctic  milliped 
that  occurs  in  Madeira,  the  Azores  and  Canary  Islands,  and  widely  in  western 
Europe  -  -  Iceland,  Ireland,  Great  Britain,  Portugal,  France,  Luxembourg,  Bel- 
gium, The  Netherlands,  Germany,  Denmark,  Poland,  Czech  Republic,  Romania, 
Hungary,  Switzerland,  Italy,  Norway,  Sweden,  Finland,  Lithuania,  and  Russia 


104  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


(European  part)  -  and  has  probably  been  introduced  to  much  of  this  area 
(Enghoff  and  Kime  2004).  It  is  one  of  five  European  blaniulids  that  have  been 
introduced  into  North  America  and  now  occur  here  primarily  in  urban  habitats; 
with  its  synanthropic  habits  in  the  US  and  the  absence  of  tree  litter  and  moisture 
at  Mercury,  we  surmise  that  the  lectotype  of  T.  tida  was  found  in  or  beside  one 
of  the  dwellings  there.  In  North  America,  C.  palmatus  has  been  recorded  from 
Nova  Scotia,  Newfoundland,  and  Ontario,  Canada,  and,  in  the  United  States, 
New  York,  Pennsylvania,  Ohio,  Colorado,  Nevada,  California,  and  Washington; 
it  has  also  been  introducted  to  Hawaii  (Jawlowski  1939;  Palmen  1952; 
Chamberlin  and  Hoffman  1958;  Kevan  1983;  Enghoff  1984;  Shelley  1988, 
20026;  Shelley  and  Swift  1998;  Hoffman  1999).  We  therefore  formally  place 
T.  tida  in  synonymy  under  C.  palmatus,  as  summarized  below,  and  provide 
unpublished  North  American  records  that  the  first  author  has  discovered  in  10 
US  repositories,  which  include  one  new  Canadian  province  and  six  new  US 
states.  The  contents  of  each  sample  (the  total  number  of  individuals  and  the  num- 
ber of  each  sex)  were  not  always  recorded,  so  this  is  only  provided  when  known. 
Institutional  acronyms  are  as  follows: 

AMNH  -  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  New  York,  NY. 

CAS  -  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San  Francisco. 

FSCA-  Florida  State  Collection  of  Arthropods,  Gainesville. 

MCZ  -  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  University,  Cambridge, 

MA. 

MPM  -  Milwaukee  Public  Museum,  Milwaukee,  WI. 
NCSM  -  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  Raleigh. 
NMNH  --  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution, 

Washington,  DC. 
PMNH  -  Peabody  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Yale  University,  New  Haven, 

CT. 
UCT    -  Department  of  Ecology  and  Evolutionary  Biology,  University  of 

Connecticut,  Storrs. 
USU  -  Biology  Department,  Utah  State  University,  Logan. 


Choneiulus  Brolemann,  1921 

Choneiulus  is  characterized  by  the  "fringed  funnel"  configuration  of  the  male 
posterior  gonopods  and  by  the  fully  developed  second  legs  of  females.  The  gono- 
pod  morphology  is  shared  with  Archichoneiulus  Brolemann,  1921,  a  north  Afri- 
can genus  that  was  synonymized  under  Choneiulus  by  Hoffman  (1980)  but 
retained  as  a  separate  genus  by  Enghoff  (1984)  because  the  second  legs  of 
females  are  reduced.  Choneiulus  includes  five  species,  all  confined  to  the  west- 
ern Mediterranean  area  of  the  Palaearctic  region  except  for  C.  palmatus  (Enghoff 
1984,2001). 


Vol.  115,  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 105 

Choneiulus  palmatus  (Nemec,  1895) 

Titsona  Ma  Chamberlin,  1962:54-55,  fig.  6.  Hoffman,  1999:112.  Jeekel,  2004:74.  New  Synonymy. 

Diagnosis:  Distinguished  from  all  other  North  American  ocellate  blaniulids 
(the  indigenous  species,  Virgoiulus  minutus  (Brandt,  1841),  and  the  introduced 
species,  Nopoiulus  kochii  (Gervais,  1847)  and  Proteroiulus  fuscus  (Am  Stein, 
1857)  by  the  presence  of  a  row  of  very  long  setae  dorsally  and  dorsolaterally 
along  the  caudal  pleurotergal  margins;  the  setae  are  considerably  shorter  in  the 
other  species  (see  Enghoff  and  Shelley  1979:67,  figs.  1-4).  From  P.  fuscus,  which 
is  most  similar  to  C.  palmatus  in  terms  of  pleurotergal  setal  lengths,  C.  palmatus 
differs  by  being  more  slender  and  by  having  the  ocelli  in  a  single  row,  whereas 
they  form  a  narrow  triangle  in  P.  fuscus  (see  Blower,  1985:109,  111,  figs.  33  A- 
E,  34A).  Males  of  C.  palmatus  are  easily  distinguished  from  other  American 
species  by  the  posterior  gonopods,  which  resemble  small,  fringed  funnels/trum- 
pets and  are  usually  visible  in  lateral  view  without  dissection  (pertinent  illustra- 
tions in  Enghoff  and  Shelley  1979  and  Blower  1985).  The  female  vulvae  also 
exhibit  a  characteristic  configuration  but  are  difficult  to  dissect  from  these  small, 
narrow  millipeds  (pertinent  illustrations  in  Lohmander  1925,  Enghoff  and 
Shelley  1979,  and  Enghoff  1984). 

New  North  American  Records: 

CANADA.  NEWFOUNDLAND:  southeast  arm  of  Nameless  Is.,  exact  location  unknown  but 
possibly  in  Nameless  Cove  in  northern  Newfoundland  near  Anchor  Point,  9-  July  8,  1938,  BWB 
(NMNH).  ONTARIO:  Middlesex  Co.,  9.4  mi  (15  km)  N  London,  June  23,  1983,  R.  G.  Holmberg 
(FSCA).  Renfrew  Co.,  Braeside,  49,  April  11,  1987,  L.  LeSage,  R.  Skidmore  (NCSM).  QUEBEC: 
Iberville  Co.,  Iberville,  Dietrich-Jooss  Vineyard,  May  14  -  September  3,  1998,  L.  LeSage  et  al. 
(NCSM).  Missisquoi  Co.,  Dunham,  L'Orpailleur  Vineyard,  May  27,  1998,  L.  LeSage  et  al.  (NCSM). 
New  Provincial  Record. 

UNITED  STATES.  CALIFORNIA:  San  Francisco  Co.,  San  Francisco,  along  Lawton  St.  nr.  30th 
Ave.,  soil  in  sidewalk  crack,  Cf,  April  23,  1991,  P.  Rubtzoff  (CAS).  COLORADO:  Larimer  Co..  Fort 
Collins,  9,  May  24,  1961,  T.  A.  Woolley  (MCZ).  CONNECTICUT:  New  Haven  Co.,  New  Haven, 
Edgewood  Park,  99-  November  1973,  M.  Rico  (PMNH)  and  Yale  University  campus,  d",  October  3, 
1986,  J.  M.  Tuteur  (PMNH);  and  Woodbridge,  9,  May  11,  1961,  C.  L.  Remington  (PMNH).  Tolland 
Co.,  Storrs,  July  1 6,  1 974,  collector  unknown  (UCT).  New  State  Record.  ILLINOIS:  Lake  Co.,  Lake 
Forest,  Lake  Forest  Ravine,  in  oak  tree  hole,  39,  November  7,  1 959,  W.  Suter  (FSCA).  New  State 
Record.  MARYLAND:  Montgomery  Co.,  Bethesda,  Cf,  59,  November  4,  1978,  T.  J.  Spillman 
(NMNH).  New  State  Record.  MINNESOTA:  Ramsey  Co.,  St.  Paul.  Cf,  April  25,  1935,  H.  H. 
Sheperd  (FSCA).  New  State  Record.  NEVADA:  Nye  Co.,  Mercury,  9-  March  1960,  collector 
unknown  (NMNH).  NEW  YORK:  New  York  Co.,  New  York  City,  Manhattan,  Central  Park,  9,  April 
15,  1964,  J.  and  W.  Ivie  (AMNH).  Tompkins  Co.,  Ithaca,  Cf,  May  21,  1967,  collector  unknown 
(NMNH).  Westchester  Co.,  Briarcliff  Manor.  Cfcf.  99.  April  16,  1979,  A.  M.  Young  (MPM. 
NCSM).  OHIO:  Wayne  Co.,  Wooster,  April  14.  1958,  A.  A.  Weaver  (NCSM).  SOUTH  DAKOTA: 
Pennington  Co.,  Lead,  along  US  Hwy.  85  at  Homestake  Mine.  juv.cf.  249-  May  15,  1986,  R.  M. 
Shelley  (NCSM).  New  State  Record.  UTAH:  Cache  Co..  Logan,  9,  March  29,  1972,  B.  G.  Orpin 
(USU).  Salt  Lake  Co..  Alta,  July  1948,  collector  unknown  (AMNH);  and  Salt  Lake  City,  May  20, 
1949,  S.  Mulaik  (AMNH).  New  State  Record. 


106  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  J.  Coddington,  for  loans  of  the  syntypes  of  T.  tida  and  samples  of  C.  palmatus  in  the 
NMNH,  and  the  following  curators  and  collection  managers  for  access  to  or  loans  of  the  latter  from 
the  holdings  under  their  charges:  N.  I.  Platnick  (AMNH),  C.  E.  Griswold  (CAS),  G.  B.  Edwards 
(FSCA),  L.  Leibensperger  (MCZ),  J.  P.  Jass  (MPM),  R.  S.  Pupedis  (PMNH),  J.  E.  O'Donnell  (UCT), 
and  W.  J.  Hanson  (USU).  L.  LeSage,  Agriculture  Canada,  provided  the  samples  from  Quebec,  and  R. 
L.  Hoffman  provided  a  presubmission  review. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Blower,  J.  G.  1985.  Millipedes.  Synopses  of  the  British  Fauna  (New  Series)  No.  35:1-242,  Linnean 
Society  of  London,  E.  J.  Brill,  London,  England,  United  Kingdom. 

Buckett,  J.  S.  1964.  Annotated  List  of  the  Diplopoda  of  California.  Simmons  Publishing  Co., 
Davis,  California,  U.S.A.  34  pp. 

Chamberlin,  R.  V.  1912.  New  North  American  chilopods  and  diplopods.  Annals  of  the  Ento- 
mological Society  of  America,  5:141-172. 

Chamberlin,  R.  V.  1962.  Millipeds  from  the  Nevada  Test  Area.  Proceedings  of  the  Biological 
Society  of  Washington,  75:53-56. 

Chamberlin,  R.  V.  and  R.  L.  Hoffman.  1958.  Checklist  of  the  millipeds  of  North  America.  U.  S. 
National  Museum  Bulletin  No.  212:1-236. 

Enghoff,  H.  1984.  Revision  of  the  millipede  genus  Choneiuhis  (Diplopoda,  Julida,  Blaniulidae). 
Steenstrupia,  10(6):  193-203. 

Enghoff,  H.  2001.  A  new  cavernicolous  species  of  Choneiulus  from  Sicily  (Diplopoda, 
Blaniulidae).  Fragmenta  Entomologica,  33(1):9-13 

Enghoff,  H.  and  R.  D.  Kinu .  2004.  Diplopoda.  Fauna  Europaea  Service,  http://faunaeur.org 

Enghoff,  H.  and  R.  M.  Shelley.  1979.  A  revision  of  the  millipede  genus  Nopoinlus  (Diplopoda, 
Julida:  Blaniulidae).  Entomologica  Scandinavica,  10:65-72. 

Hoffman,  R.  L.  1980  (1979).  Classification  of  the  Diplopoda.  Museum  d'Histoire  Naturelle,  Gene- 
va, Switzerland,  237  pp. 

Hoffman,  R.  L.  1999.  Checklist  of  the  Millipeds  of  North  and  Middle  America.  Virginia  Museum 
of  Natural  History  Special  Publication  No.  8:1-584. 

Jawlowski,  H.  1939.  Contribution  to  the  knowledge  of  the  Diplopoda  of  Nova  Scotia  and  New- 
foundland. Fragmenta  Faunistica  4:149-158. 

Jeekel,  C.  A.  W.  1953.  Duizendpootachtigen-Myriopoda  I.  De  Millioenpoten  (Diplopoda)  van 
Nederland.  Kon.  Nederlandse  Natuurhistorische  Vereniging  Wetenschappelijke  Mededelingen 
No.  9:1-22. 

Jeekel,  C.  A.  W.  2004.  A  bibliographic  catalogue  of  the  "Cambaloidea"  (Diplopoda,  Spiro- 
streptida).  Myriapod  Memoranda  7:43-109. 

Kevan,  D.  K.  McE.  1983.  A  preliminary  survey  of  known  and  potentially  Canadian  millipedes 
(Diplopoda).  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  61(12):2956-2975. 

Lohmander,  H.  1925.  Sveriges  diplopoder.  Goteborgs  Kungliga  Vetenskapsoch  Vitterhets- 
samhalles  Handlingar,  tja'rde  foljden  30(2):  1-1 13. 

Loomis,  H.  F.  1938.  The  cambaloid  millipeds  of  the  United  States,  including  a  family  new  to  the 
fauna  and  new  genera  and  species.  Proceedings  of  the  U.  S.  National  Museum,  86:27-66. 

Palmen,  E.  Survey  of  the  Diplopoda  of  Newfoundland.  Annales  Zoologici  Societatis  Zoologicae 
Botanicae  Fennicae  'Vanamo'  15(1):  1-31. 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 107 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1979.  A  synopsis  of  the  milliped  genus  Cambala.  with  a  description  of  C.  minor 
Bollman  (Spirostreptida:  Cambalidae).  Proceedings  of  the  Biological  Society  of  Washington 
92(4):55 1-571. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1981.  The  identity  and  status  of  Cambala  washingtonensis  Causey  (Diplopoda: 
Spirostreptida:  Cambalidae).  Entomological  News  92(2):75-78. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1988.  The  millipeds  of  eastern  Canada  (Arthropoda:  Diplopoda).  Canadian  Journal 
of  Zoology  66: 1638-1663. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1996.  The  milliped  order  Callipodida  in  western  North  America  (Schizopetalidae: 
Tynommathrae),  and  a  summary  of  the  New  World  fauna.  Entomologica  Scandinavica  27:25-64. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2002a.  Annotated  checklist  of  the  millipeds  of  California  (Arthropoda:  Diplopoda). 
Western  North  American  Naturalist  Monographs  1:90-115. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2002/7.  The  millipeds  of  central  Canada  (Arthropoda:  Diplopoda),  with  reviews  of 
the  Canadian  fauna  and  diplopod  faunistic  studies.  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  80:1863-1875. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  and  S.  F.  Swift.  1998.  The  milliped  order  Julida  in  the  Hawaiian  Islands.  Bishop 
Museum  Occasional  Papers  No.  56:38-43. 


108  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

DESCRIPTION  OF  SEVEN  NEW  SPECIES  OF 

JANBECHYNEA  (ORSODACNIDAE  OR  CHRYSOMELIDAE, 

SENSULATO)  FROM  MEXICO:  AVAILABILITY  OF 

NEW  NAMES  AND  CORRECTIONS' 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay2 

Recently,  I  described  seven  new  species  of  aulacosceline  chrysomelids,  sensu 
lato  (Santiago-Blay  2004).  Because  of  the  voluminous  nature  of  the  book,  New 
developments  in  the  biology  of  Chiysomelidae  (Jolivet  et  al.  2004),  in  which  those 
descriptions  were  included,  the  chapter  was  part  of  the  CD  portion  of  the  book. 
However,  nowhere  in  the  chapter  or  book  did  I  indicate  that  "copies  [of  the  work] 
(in  the  form  in  which  it  is  published)  have  been  deposited  in  at  least  5  major  pub- 
licly accessible  libraries  which  are  identified  by  name  in  the  work  itself  as 
required  by  Article  8.6  of  the  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomenclature 
(1999).  To  make  the  binomina  available,  herein  I  am  providing  the  Code-satisfying 
data:  binomen,  diagnosis,  and  the  fixation  of  the  holotype,  including  the  reposito- 
ry (mandatory  since  January  1,  2000),  for  each  new  taxon.  In  addition,  corrections 
to  the  paper  are  included. 


Description  of  seven  new  species  of  Janbechynea 

Bracketed  phrases  in  type  data  have  been  added  for  clarity  when  they  are  not  in  the  original  label. 


Janbechynea  (Bothroscelis)  georgepauljohnringo  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  80,  192-197  of  Santiago-Blay  2004) 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  one  adult  female;  deposited  at  Department  of  Entomology  Collection,  Texas 
A&M  University  (College  Station,  Texas).  Mexico,  Guerrero  [3.4  km]  5.4  miles  NE  of  Xochlipala;  July 
13,  1989;  Jones  and  Schaeffer,  collectors.  Specimens  Examined:  one. 

Abbreviated  description  and  diagnosis:  Approximately  8  mm  long,  setose  throughout.  Color: 
head  and  pronotum  reddish  orange  dorsally,  elytra  yellowish  brown  with  basal  third  of  elytral  humeral 
margin  reddish  orange;  ventrally  reddish  orange  except  head  which  is  yellowish  orange  and  apex  of 
femora,  tibiae,  and  tarsi  which  are  dark  brown  to  black.  Head  and  pronotum  shinny,  with  regularly 
spaced  puncta,  each  with  one  seta.  Pronotum  slightly  longer  than  wide;  disc  convex;  lateral  aspects  es- 
pecially setose;  lateral  and  posterior  margins  well  defined,  flanges  only  slightly  turning  upwards.  Elytra 
dull,  with  numerous  puncta,  each  bearing  one  seta,  setae  generally  longer  than  interpunctal  distance. 

Distinguished  from  other  species  of  Janbechynea  (Bothrosocelis)  as  follows:  1 )  from  J.  (B.)fuh'ipes 
by  the  color  and  setation  of  the  pronotum  (pale  yellowish  orange  and  disc  almost  devoid  of  setae)  and 
leg  coloration  (pale  brown  throughout);  2)  from  J.  (B.)  virkkii  by  its  more  robust  appearance  (L/W  < 


1  Received  on  August  20,  2004.  Accepted  on  November  3,  2004. 

2  Department  of  Paleobiology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  MRC-121,  Smithsonian  Institution, 
10th  and  Constitution  Avenue,  P.O.  Box  370122,  Washington,  DC  20013-7012  U.S.A.     E-mail: 
santiago-blay(«'nmnh. si.edu. 

Mailed  on  December  21,  2004 


Vol.  115.  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004 109 


2.5);  3)  from  J.  (B.)  melyroides  by  its  more  abundance  and  recumbent  setation;  and  4)  from  J.  (B.) 
suzanita  by  its  darker  color  and  much  smaller  size. 

Etymology:  The  specific  epithet  is  an  arbitrary  combination  of  letters  that  is  indeclinable  and 
honors  the  first  name  of  the  members  of  the  1960's  British  musical  band,  "The  Beatles":  George 
Harrison,  Paul  McCartney,  John  Lennon,  and  Richard  Starkey  (a.k.a.  "Ringo  Starr")  (Articles  11.3 
and  26,  International  Commission  of  Zoological  Nomenclature  1999). 

Geographical  distribution  and  host  plants:  Known  only  from  type  locality;  no  host  plant  data 
available. 


Janbechynea  (Bothroscelis)  suzanita  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  87,  234-239  in  Santiago-Blay  2004) 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  adult  female;  deposited  at  the  Department  of  Entomology  Collection, 
Texas  A&M  University  (College  Station,  Texas).  Label  reads  "13  mi  [=  8.1  km]  NW  Ocozocoautla, 
Chis.  [=  Chiapas?],  Mex.  [=  Mexico];  VI-24-[19]65;  H.  R.  Burke,  J.  R.  Meyer,  J.  C.  Shaffner. 
Specimens  Examined:  one  adult  female. 

Abbreviated  description  and  differential  diagnosis:  Approximately  12  mm  long;  very  sparse- 
ly setose.  Color:  yellowish  orange  throughout,  legs  slightly  more  orange  except  for  distal  fourth  of 
femur  and  distal  segments  which  are  black.  Pronotum  shinny,  almost  completely  devoid  of  setae;  disc 
broadly  and  uniformly  rounded,  lateral  flanges  turning  upwards  giving  pronotum  appearance  of  a 
wide  "w"  in  cross  section.  Elytra  dull,  not  shinny;  with  irregularly  spaced,  minute  puncta  and  short 
setae;  setae  shorter  than  interpunctal  distance. 

Distinguished  from  other  species  of  Janbechynea  by  its  relative  pronotum  lacking  setae,  small 
elytral  setae,  and  overall  coloration.  This  species  also  resembles  Aulacoscelis  grandis  and  A.  tibialis, 
from  which  it  can  be  distinguished  by  the  absence  of  the  characteristic  longitudinal  flaps  contiguous 
to  the  posterior  pronotal  pits  which  are  present  in  all  species  of  Aulacoscelis.  Janbechynea  suzanita 
is  obviously  different  from  all  other  Janbechynea;  it  may  grant  subgeneric  status,  just  as  Monros 
(1954)  commented  for  A.  grandis. 

Etymology:  The  specific  epithet  is  an  arbitrary  combination  of  letters  that  is  indeclinable  and 
honors  Ms.  Suzanne  Shaffer,  dear  friend  of  author  JASB,  and  cybernophile.  I  have  deleted  the  "ne" 
on  "Suzanne"  to  make  the  specific  epithet  more  euphonious.  The  suffix  "ita,"  which  has  been  added 
to  "suzan,"  is,  in  this  case,  used  to  express  affection;  "a"  indicates  the  person  is  a  female,  which  is 
also  the  case  of  the  holotype  (Articles  1 1.3  and  26,  International  Commission  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature 1999). 

Geographic  distribution  and  host  plants:  Known  only  from  type  locality;  no  host  plant  data 
available. 


Janbechynea  (Bothroscelis)  virkkii  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  88,  240-245  in  Santiago-Blay  2004) 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  one  adult  male;  deposited  at  the  University  of  California  (Berkeley)  Essig 
Museum  of  Entomology.  Label  reads  "1  mi  N.  San  Jose  de  Felix,  Zac[acatecas],  Mex[ico];  VII-14- 
[19]54;  J.  W.  McSwain,  collector."  Specimens  Examined:  11;  7  males,  4  females,  all  but  holotype 
designated  as  paratypes.  Paratypes  deposited  at  the  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History  (Chicago), 
Texas  A&M  Univesity,  Shawn  W.  Clark  Collection  (Utah),  California  Academy  of  Sciences  (San 
Francisco,  CA). 

Abbreviated  description  and  differential  diagnosis:  Approximately  6-7  mm  long,  slender- 
looking  species,  setose  throughout.  Color:  head,  thorax,  and  pronotum  chestnut  brown;  legs  darken- 
ing towards  apex,  femora  yellowish  brown,  tibiae  brown,  tarsi  dark  brown.  Head  and  pronotum  shiny, 
with  regularly  spaced  shallow  puncta,  each  with  one  seta.  Pronotum  wider  than  long;  disk  convex, 
lateral  aspects  of  pronotum  only  moderately  setose;  lateral  and  posterior  margins  well  defined, 
flanges  only  slightly  turning  upwards.  Elytra  not  as  shiny  as  head  and  pronotum.  \\ith  numerous 
puncta,  each  bearing  one  seta,  setae  generally  longer  than  interpunctal  distance. 


1 1 0  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Distinguished  from  other  species  of  Janbechvnea  by  its  small  size  and  relatively  slender  look  (LAV 
>2.5). 

Etymology:  The  specific  epithet  is  an  arbitrary  combination  of  letters  that  is  indeclinable  and  hon- 
ors Dr.  Niilo  Virkki,  dear  friend,  field  companion  in  the  hunt  for  "crisomelidos  en  copula,"  and  col- 
league of  author,  cytogeneticist  par  excellence,  from  whom  I  learned  the  craft  (Articles  11.3  and  26, 
International  Commission  of  Zoological  Nomenclature  1999). 

Geographical  Distribution  and  Host  Plants:  known  from  the  central  western  Mexican  States  of 
Mexico,  Zacatecas,  Durango,  and  Jalisco;  no  host  plant  data  available. 

Janbechynea  (Janbechynea)  julioi  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  82,  204-209  in  Santiago-Blay  2004) 

Type  Data:  Holotype  one  adult  female,  deposited  at  the  Robert  H.  Turnbow  Private  Collection 
(Alabama).  Mexixo,  Chiapas,  El  Sumidero,  Mirador  La  Coyota,  La  Mesa  de  Nayar;  June  24,  1990; 
R.  Turnbow;  on  Guazuma  [Sterculiaceae].  Paratype  female;  same  data  as  holotype.  Specimens 
Examined:  Two. 

Abbreviated  description  (parenthetical  phrases  refer  to  female)  and  differential  diagnosis: 
Approximately  10-11  mm  long;  head  and  pronotum  shiny,  abundantly  setose;  elytra  dull,  particularly 
setose.  Color:  with  faded  yellow  and  black  longitudinal  stripes  dorsally,  obvious  in  pronotum  and  ely- 
tra; yellowish  brown  throughout  ventrally;  legs  yellowish  brown,  distal  fourth  of  femora,  tibiae,  and 
tarsi  brown  to  dark  brown,  darkening  towards  apex.  Pronotum  wider  than  long,  strongly  narrowing  pos- 
teriorly; shiny,  with  numerous  moderately  deep  punta,  some  bearing  one  seta,  setation  abundant 
throughout;  disc  convex,  lateral  flanges  of  pronotum  only  slightly  turning  upward.  Elytra  with  numer- 
ous relatively  deep  puncta  each  bearing  one  seta  (with  two  well-developed  costae  on  basal  third  of  ely- 
tra, elytral  apices  curved  outwards),  setae  longer  than  interpunctal  distance. 

Distinguished  from  other  species  of  the  nominal  subgenus  of  Janbechynea,  as  follows:  1 )  from 
J.  (J.)  paradoxa  and  J.  (J.)  invemsimilis  by  its  smaller  size  and  metacoxae  lacking  projections, 
2)  from  J.  (J.)  snyderae  by  its  pronotal  shape  and  striped  coloration;  3)  from  J.  (J.)  woodburyi  by  its 
striped  coloration,  and  4)  from  J.  (J.)  maldonadoi  by  its  more  setose  head  and  pronotum. 

Geographical  distribution  and  host  plants:  Known  only  from  type  locality;  "on  Guazuma  sp." 
(Sterculiaceae). 

Etymology:  The  specific  epithet  is  an  arbitrary  combination  of  letters  that  is  indeclinable  and  hon- 
ors my  former  travel  partner  and  beloved  paternal  grandfather,  Julio  Santiago-Ortega,  whose  memory 
of  joy  and  delicious  travel  foods  always  remains  (Articles  11.3  and  26,  International  Commission  of 
Zoological  Nomenclature.  1999). 

Janbechynea  (Janbechynea)  maldonadoi  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  83,  210-215  in  Santiago-Blay  2004) 

Type  Data:  Holotype  one  adult  male;  deposited  at  University  of  California  (Berkeley)  Essig 
Museum  of  Entomology.  Label  reads  "Mex[ixo],  Nay[arit],  La  Mesa  de  Nayar;  VII-19-1955;  B. 
Malkin,  colector."  Paratype  female;  same  data  as  holotype,  except  collected  on  VI1-2 1-1955;  also 
deposited  at  the  University  of  California  (Berkeley)  Essig  Museum  of  Entomology.  Specimens 
Examined:  Two. 

Abbreviated  description  (parenthetical  phrases  refer  to  female)  and  differential  diagnosis: 
Approximately  10-11  mm  long;  head  and  pronotum  shiny,  sparsely  setose;  elytra  dull,  particularly 
setose.  Color:  with  yellow  and  black  longitudinal  stripes  dorsally,  obvious  in  pronotum  and  elytra;  yel- 
lowish brown  throughout  ventrally;  legs  yellowish  brown,  distal  fourth  of  femora,  tibiae,  and  tarsi 
brown  to  dark  brown,  darkening  towards  apex.  Pronotum  wider  than  long,  strongly  narrowing  posteri- 
orly; shiny,  with  numerous  moderately  deep  punta,  some  bearing  one  seta,  setation  sparse,  not  particu- 
larly abundant  towards  lateral  sides;  disc  convex,  lateral  flanges  of  pronotum  only  slightly  turning 
upwards.  Elytra  with  numerous  relatively  deep  puncta  each  bearing  one  seta  (with  two  well-developed 
costae  on  basal  third  of  elytra,  elytral  apices  curved  outwards),  setae  longer  than  interpunctal  distance. 


Vol.  115.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2004 


Distinguished  from  other  species  of  the  nominal  subgenus  of  Janbechynea.  as  follows:  1 )  from 
J.  (Jj  paradoxa  and  J.  (J.)  invemsimilis  by  its  smaller  size  and  metacoxae  lacking  projections, 
2)  from  J.  (J.)  snyderae  by  its  pronotal  shape  and  striped  coloration;  3)  from  J.  (J.)  woodburyi  by  its 
striped  coloration,  and  4)  from  J.  (J.)julioi  by  its  less  setose  head  and  pronotum. 

Etymology:  The  specific  epithet  is  an  arbitrary  combination  of  letters  that  is  indeclinable  and  hon- 
ors my  late  friend  and  colleague  in  entomology.  Dr.  Jenaro  Maldonado  Capriles,  with  whom  I  spent  so 
many  joyful  moments  of  learning.  (Articles  11.3  and  26,  International  Commission  of  Zoological 
Nomenclature.  1999). 

Geographical  distribution  and  host  plants:  Known  only  from  type  locality;  no  host  plant  data 
available. 

Janbechynea  (Janbechynea)  snyderae  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  86,  228-233  in  Santiago-Blay  2004) 

Type  Data:  Holotype  female;  deposited  at  the  Robert  H.  Turnbow  Private  Collection  (Alabama). 
Label  reads  "Mexico:  Chiapas,  El  Sumidero,  Mirador  La  Coyota;  June  24,  1990;  R.  Turnbow,"  collec- 
tor. Paratype:  one  female,  same  data  as  male. 

Abbreviated  description  (parenthetical  phrases  refer  to  female)  and  differential  diagnosis: 

Approximately  10-13  mm  long;  head  and  pronotum  shiny,  barely  setose;  elytra  dull,  extensively  setose. 
Color:  head  and  pronotum  dark  yellowish  brown,  darkening  mesally;  elytra  brownish  black  with  brown 
margins.  Head,  prothorax,  and  mesothorax  yellowish  brown  ventrally,  metathorax  dark  brown, 
abdomen  mesally  yellowish  brown,  rest  dark  brown;  legs  yellowish  brown  throughout,  with  apex  of  tib- 
iae and  tarsi  almost  black,  mesofemoral  apex  and  metafemoral  apical  sixth  almost  black.  Pronotum 
longer  than  wide,  with  lateral  sides  nearly  parallel;  shiny,  with  a  very  few  shallow  punta,  with  only  a 
few  bearing  one  seta,  setation;  disc  convex  and  quite  polished,  lateral  flanges  of  pronotum  only  slight- 
ly turning  upward.  Elytra  with  numerous,  shallow  minute  puncta,  each  bearing  one  seta,  setae  longer 
than  interpunctal  distance,  without  two  well-developed  costae  on  basal  third  of  elytra,  elytral  apices 
rounded  (curved  outwards  on  females). 

Distinguished  from  other  species  of  the  nominal  subgenus  of  Janbechynea,  as  follows:  1)  from 
J.  (J.)  paradoxa  and  J.  (J.)  invemsimilis  by  its  smaller  size  and  metacoxae  lacking  projections, 
2)  from  J.  (J.)  maldonadoi  as  well  as  J.  (J.)  woodburyi  by  its  solid  coloration;  and  from  3)  J.  (J.)julioi 
by  its  nearly  parallel  pronotum. 

Etymology:  The  specific  epithet  is  an  arbitrary  combination  of  letters  that  is  indeclinable  and  hon- 
ors my  colleague,  Rebecca  Synder,  an  expert  cybernophile  who  constantly  helps  me  (Articles  1 1.3  and 
26,  International  Commission  of  Zoological  Nomenclature  1999). 

Geographical  distribution  and  host  plants:  Known  only  from  type  locality;  "on  Guazuma  sp." 
(Sterculiaceae). 

Janbechynea  (Janbechynea)  woodburyi  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  89,  246-251  in  Santiago-Blay  2004) 

Type  Data:  Holotype  female;  deposited  at  the  University  of  California  (Berkeley)  Essig  Museum 
of  Entomology.  Label  reads  "Mexfixo],  Nayfarit],  La  Mesa  de  Nayar;  VII-19-1955;  B.  Malkin,  colec- 
tor."  Paratype  female;  same  data  as  holotype,  except  collected  on  VII-2 1-1955;  also  deposited  at  the 
University  of  California  (Berkeley)  Essig  Museum  of  Entomology.  Specimens  Examined:  Two. 

Abbreviated  description  and  differential  diagnosis:  Approximately  10-11  mm  long;  head  and 
pronotum  shiny,  sparsely  setose;  elytra  dull,  moderately  setose.  Color:  yellowish  brown  throughout, 
with  black  head,  scutellum,  and  elytral  apices;  head  ventrally  black  except  mesally  yellowish  brown, 
prothorax  yellowish  brown,  rest  of  thorax  and  abdomen  dark  brown;  legs  dark  brown  throughout, 
femoral  pro-  and  retrolateral  sides  with  a  yellowish  longitudinal  area.  Pronotum  wider  than  long,  slight- 
ly narrowing  posteriorly;  shiny,  with  a  few  shallow  punta,  some  bearing  one  seta,  setation  sparse,  par- 
ticularly abundant  towards  lateral  sides;  disc  convex,  with  two  quasicircular  impressions  sublaterally, 
lateral  flanges  of  pronotum  only  slightly  turning  upward.  Elytra  with  moderately  numerous,  shallow 
puncta  relatively,  each  bearing  one  seta,  setae  longer  than  interpunctal  distance,  with  two  well-devel- 
oped costae  on  basal  third  of  elytra,  elytral  apices  curved  outwards. 


1 1 2  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Distinguished  from  other  species  of  the  nominal  subgenus  of  Janbechvnea,  as  follows:  1)  from 
J.  (J.)  paradoxa  and  J.  (J.)  inverosimilis  by  its  smaller  size  and  metacoxae  lacking  projections  and 
2)  from  J.  (J.)  snyderae,  J.  (J.)  julioi,  and  from  J.  (J.)  maldonadoi  by  its  bicolorism. 

Etymology:  The  specific  epithet  is  an  arbitrary  combination  of  letters  that  is  indeclinable  and 
honors  my  dear  professor  of  botany  in  Puerto  Rico,  the  late  Roy  Orlo  Woodbury,  phenomenal  natu- 
ralist from  whom  1  learned  my  love  for  plants,  including  cycads  (Articles  1 1.3  and  26,  International 
Commission  of  Zoological  Nomenclature  1999). 

Geographical  distribution  and  host  plants:  Known  only  from  type  locality;  no  host  plant  data 
available. 

Corrections 

The  species  A ulacoscelis  pueblensis  Medvedev  1975  was  not  included  in  Table  1  of  Santiago- 
Blay  (2004).  The  data  for  that  taxon  are  as  follows:  geographical  distribution,  Mexico;  collecting 
days  and  months,  not  reported;  plant  associates,  not  reported. 

The  species  Janbechvnea  (J.)  elongata  was  not  included  on  the  key  to  the  species  of  Aulacos- 
celinae.  The  second  portion  of  couplet  23(22),  should  read  "...  elytra  of  females  with  three  longitu- 
dinal, rather  long,  basal  keels  or  with  two  transverse  tubercles."  Female  J.  (J.)  elongata  have  the  three 
longitudinal  ridges  but  female  J.  (J.)  paradoxa  Monros  1953  and  J.  (J.)  inverosimilis  Monros  1954 
do  not.  The  later  two  species  are  separated  on  couplet  26(23). 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

Chris  Reid  (Division  of  Entomology,  CSIRO,  Canberra,  Australia)  pointed  my  nomenclatural 
mistake  in  Santiago-Blay  (2004).  In  addition  to  all  those  acknowledged  therein,  I  am  grateful  to 
Michael  Schmitt  (Zoologisches  Forschungsinstitut  und  Museum  Alexander  Koenig,  Sektion 
Coleoptera,  Bonn,  Germany)  and  F.  Christian  Thompson  (Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  Na- 
tional Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  DC)  for  confirming  there  was  a  mistake  and  sug- 
gesting Code-abiding  solutions. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

International  Commission  of  Zoological  Nomenclature.  1999.  W.D.L.  Ride,  H.G.  Cogger, 
C.  Dupuis,  O.  Kraus,  A.  Minelli,  F.C.  Thompson,  and  P.K.  Tubbs  (Editorial  Committee).  Interna- 
tional Code  of  Zoological  Nomenclature.  Fourth  Edition.  Adopted  by  the  International  Union  of 
Biological  Sciences.  International  Trust  of  Zoological  Nomenclature  c/o  The  Bristish  Museum 
(Natural  History).  London,  United  Kingdom.  306  pp. 

Jolivet,  P.,  J.  A.  Santiago-Blay,  and  M.  Schmitt  (Editors).  2004.  New  developments  in  the  biolo- 
gy of  Chrysomelidae.  SPB  Academic  Publishers  bv.  The  Hague,  The  Netherlands.  803  pp. 

Medvedev,  L.  N.  1975.  Review  of  the  chrysomelid  subfamily  Aulacoscelinae  in  entomological  col- 
lections of  the  German  Democratic  Republik.  Mitteilungen  aus  dein  Zoologischen  Museum  in 
Berlin  5 1:37-40. 

Monros,  F.  1953.  Aulacoscelinae,  eine  neue  Chrysomeliden-Unterfamilie,  mil  Beschreibung  einer 
neuen  bolivianischen  Gattung  (Col.).  Entomologische  Arbeiten  aus  dem  Museum  G.  Frey  (Miin- 
chen).  4:19-25. 

Monros,  F.  1954.  Revision  of  the  chrysomelid  subfamily  Aulacoscelinae.  Bulletin  of  the  Museum 
of  Comparative  Zoology  (Harvard  College)  1 12:321-360. 

Santiago-Blay,  J.  A.  2004.  Some  aspects  of  the  biology  of  the  Aulacoscelinae,  with  the  description 
of  seven  new  species  of  Janbechvnea.  p.  551.  Full  version  in  CD  portion  of  the  book,  66  pp.  //;. 
New  developments  on  the  biology  of  the  Chrysomelidae.  P.  Jolivet,  J.  A.  Santiago-Blay,  and 
M.  Schmitt  (Editors).  SPB  Academic  Publishers  bv.  The  Hague,  The  Netherlands.  803  pp. 
Erratum:  On  page  551  the  title  of  this  chapter,  "Some  aspects  of  the  biology  of  the 
Aulacoscelinae,  with  the  description  of  three  new  species  of  Janbechynea"  is  in  error. 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  March  &  April  2004 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

A  RECORD  OF  THE  ARCTIC  FORESTFLY, 

NEMOURA  ARCTIC  A  (PLECOPTERA:  NEMOURIDAE), 

FROM  THE  CONTIGUOUS  UNITED  STATES' 

B.  C.  Kondratieff2  and  R.  NV.  Baumann' 

The  Nemourinae  genus  Nemoura  Latreille  currently  includes  a  large  number 
of  recognized  species  primarily  occurring  in  Europe  and  Asia  (Baumann  1975, 
Harper  1975,  Zwick  and  Sivec  1980,  Shimizu  1997,  Zhu  and  Yang  2003).  Five 
species  are  known  from  North  America,  N.  arctica  Esben-Petersen,  N.  normani 
Ricker,  N.  rickeri  Jewett,  N.  spiniloba  Jewett,  and  N.  trispinosa  Claassen  (Stark 
2001).  Nemoura  normani  is  known  from  Alaska  and  the  Northwest  Territories; 
N.  rickeri  from  Alaska,  Manitoba,  and  Saskatchewan;  N.  trispinosa  widespread 
over  north  central  and  northeastern  North  America;  N.  spiniloba  is  known  from 
California;  whereas,  N.  arctica  is  known  from  Eurasia  and  Western  North 
America,  having  been  recorded  from  the  Canadian  provinces  of  Alberta,  British 
Columbia,  Manitoba,  Northwest  Territories,  Quebec,  and  in  the  U.S.,  Alaska 
(Stark  2001). 

Nemoura  arctica  was  originally  described  from  Norway  (Esben-Petersen 
1910),  and  is  considered  a  common  species  of  streams  and  lakes  in  northern 
Europe  (Lillehammer  1974b,  Lillehammer  1988)  and  is  recognized  as  a  variable 
species  in  male  and  female  terminalia  structures  (Lillehammer  1974a).  Baumann 
et  al.  (1977)  indicated  that  TV.  arctica  had  been  collected  only  from  two  localities 
in  the  Rocky  Mountains;  Summit  Lake,  British  Columbia,  and  Spearfish,  South 
Dakota.  However,  the  South  Dakota  records  actually  pertained  to  TV.  trispinosa 
(Sargent  et  al.  1999).  Therefore,  no  record  of  this  species  has  been  published 
from  the  contiguous  United  States. 

Almost  eighteen  years  ago,  the  senior  author  collected  a  series  of  specimens 
of  N.  arctica  from  a  lake  in  a  high  elevation  alpine/subalpine  wilderness  in  the 
Snowy  Range  of  Wyoming.  This  area  is  located  at  3,200  to  3,500  m  elevation 
about  55  km  west  of  Laramie,  Wyoming.  This  area  has  developed  from  Quater- 
nary and  Holocene  glaciation,  with  glacial  cirque  basins  (Musselman  1992).  An 
alpine  lake  dominates  each  watershed.  Three  other  stoneflies  are  also  known 
from  the  lakes;  Capnia  confusa  (Claassen),  Malenka  flexura  (Claassen),  and 
Podmosta  delicatula  (Claassen). 


1  Received  on  June  4,  2004.  Accepted  on  July  16,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Bioagricultural  Sciences  and  Pest  Management.  Colorado  State  University,  Fort 
Collins,  Colorado  80523  U.S.A.  E-mail:  Boris.KondratietTtocoIostate.edu. 

'  Department   of  Integrative   Biology,   Monte   L.   Bean   Life   Science   Museum,   Brigham  Young 
University,  Provo,  Utah  84602  U.S.A.  E-mail:  Richard_Baumann(a  byu.edu. 

Mailed  on  December  21,  2004 


114 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


We  provide  figures  of  the  epiproct  and  cerci  from  the  Wyoming  population  for 
comparison  with  previously  published  figures  by  Koponen  (1949),  Brinck 
(1952),  Zhiltzova  (1972),  Lillehammer  (1974a,  1988).  The  epiproct  structures  of 
the  Wyoming  specimens  (Figs.  1-3)  agree  with  the  variation  as  accepted  by  Lille- 
hammer  (1974a,  especially  Fig.  25f). 


Figures  1-3  Nemoura  arctica.    1.  Male  terminalia,  lateral.  2.  Male  terminalia,  dorsal, 
3.  Sclerotized  structures  of  the  epiproct,  ventral. 


Material  Examined:  Wyoming,  Albany  Co.,  West  Glacier  Lake,  Medicine  Bow  National  Forest, 
June  29,  1987,  B.  Kondratieff  and  B.  Painter;  1  male,  2  females,  same  but  July  21,  1987,  3  males,  17 
females.  Material  is  deposited  in  the  C.  P.  Gillette  Museum  of  Arthropod  Diversity,  Colorado  State 
University,  and  Monte  L.  Bean  Life  Science  Museum,  Brigham  Young  University. 


Vol.  115,  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004 115 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  Dave  Carlson  (Windsor,  Colorado)  for  the  illustrations. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Baumann,  R.  W.  1975.  Revision  of  the  stonefly  family  Nemouridae  (Plecoptera):  A  study  of  the 
World  Fauna  at  the  generic  level.  Smithsonian  Contributions  to  Zoology  No.  21 1.  pp.  1-74. 

Baumann,  R.  W.,  A.  R.  Gaufin,  and  R.  F.  Surdick.  1977.  The  stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  the 
Rocky  Mountains.  Memoirs  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  31:  1-208. 

Brinck,  P.   1952.  Backslandor,  Plecoptera.  Svensk  Insektfauna  15:  1-126. 

Esben-Petersen,  P.  1910.  Bidrag  til  en  fortegnelse  over  arktisk  Norges  Neuropterfauna  Tromso 
Museums  Arshefter.  31/32:  82-86. 

Harper,  P.  P.  1975.  Quelques  Amphinemura  et  Nemoura  nouvelles  du  Nepal  (Plecopteres:  Nemour- 
ides).  Nouvelle  Revue  d'Entomologie  5:  119-127. 

Koponen,  J.  S.  and  P.  Brinck.  1949.  Neue  oder  wenig  bekannte  Plecoptera.  Annales  Entomologici 
Fennicae  15:  1-21. 

Lillehammer,  A.  1974a.  Norwegian  stoneflies.  I.  Analysis  of  the  variation  in  morphological  and 
structural  characters  used  in  taxonomy.  Norsk  Entomologisk  Tidsskrift  21:  59-107. 

Lillehammer,  A.  1974b.  Norwegian  stoneflies.  II.  Distribution  and  relationship  to  the  environment. 
Norsk  Entomologisk  Tidsskrift  21:  195-250. 

Lillehammer,  A.  1988.  Stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  Fennoscandia  and  Denmark.  Fauna  Entomo- 
logica  Scandinavica  21:  1-165. 

Musselman,  R.  C.  1992.  The  Glacier  Lakes  Ecosystem  Experiments  Site.  United  States 
Department  of  Agriculture,  Forest  Service,  Rocky  Mountain  Forest  and  Range  Experiment 
Station,  General  Technical  Report  RM-249.  94  pp. 

Sargent,  B.  O.,  R.  W.  Baumann,  and  B.  C.  Kondratieff.  1999.  Stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  the 
Black  Hills  of  South  Dakota  and  Wyoming,  U.S.A.:  Distribution  and  zoogeographic  affinities. 
Great  Basin  Naturalist  59:  1-17. 

Shimi/u,  T.  1997.  The  species  of  the  Nemoura  ovocercia-group  (Plecoptera:  Nemouridae).  Aquatic 
Insects  19:  193-218. 

Stark,  B.  P.  2001.  North  American  stonefly  list.  www.mc.edu/campus/users/stark/Sfly0102.htm 

Zhiltzova,  L.  A.  1972.  On  the  fauna  of  stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  the  Mongolian  Peoples  Republic. 
Naskomye  Mongolii  1:  119-121. 

Zhu,  F  and  D.  Yang.  2003.  Two  new  species  of  Nemoura  from  China  (Plecoptera,  Nemouridae). 
Acta  Zootaxonomica  Sinica  28:  474-477. 

Zwick,  P.  and  I.  Sivec.  1980.  Beitrage  zur  Kenntnis  der  Plecoptera  des  Himalaja.  Entomologica 
BasilensiaS:  59-138. 


1 1 6  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

A  FOURTH  FLORIDIAN  RECORD  OF  THE  CENTIPEDE 

GENUS  RHYSIDA  WOOD,  1862;  POTENTIAL 
ESTABLISHMENT  OF/?.  L.  LONGIPES  (NEWPORT,  1845) 

IN  MIAMI-DADE  COUNTY 

(SCOLOPENDROMORPHAiSCOLOPENDRIDAE: 

OTOSTIGMINAE)1 

Rowland  M.  Shelley2  and  G.  B.  Edwards1 

The  scolopendrid  centipede  subfamily  Otostigminae  is  represented  in  the 
Western  Hemisphere  by  two  genera,  Otostigmus  Porat,  1876  (only  the  subgenus 
Parotostigmus  Pocock,  1896,  occurs  here),  and  Rhysida  Wood,  1862,  neither  of 
which  is  native  to  the  continental  United  States  (Shelley  2002).  There  is  an  old, 
uncorroborated  record  of  R.  longipes  (Newport,  1 845  )4  from  Fort  Jefferson,  Dry 
Tortugas  National  Park,  Florida  (Wood  1862),  and  six  authors  have  reported  R. 
celeris  (Humbert  &  Saussure,  1870)  from  "Carolina"  and  Georgia  (Humbert  & 
Saussure  1870,  Kohlrausch  1881,  Underwood  1887,  Pocock  1896,  Kraepelin 
1903,  Attems  1930).  However,  Crabill  (1960)  expressed  doubt  that  the  latter  was 
established  here,  and  Shelley  (2002)  agreed,  deleting  it  from  the  North  American 
fauna.  Neither  Otostigmus  nor  Rhysida  has  been  revised,  and  they  are  on  a  list  of 
seven  scolopendromorph  genera  that  particularly  need  "taxonomic  attention" 
(Lewis  2003).  Literature  records  are  therefore  confusing  and  probably  unreliable, 
but  the  northernmost  of  the  Otostigminae  in  the  Americas  are  R.  nuda  immar- 
ginata  (Porat,  1876),  from  Durango,  Mexico;  R.  I.  longipes  from  Sinaloa  and  St. 
Croix,  US  Virgin  Islands;  O.  (P.)  denticulatus  (Pocock,  1896),  from  Guerrero, 
Mexico,  and  Guatemala;  R.  n.  nuda  (Newport,  1845),  from  Belize,  Guatemala, 
El  Salvador,  Cuba,  and  Haiti;  O.  (P.)  occidentalis  Meinert,  1886,  from  Haiti;  and 
O.  (P.)  caraibicus  Kraepelin,  1903,  from  Puerto  Rico,  the  US  Virgin  Islands  (St. 
Thomas  and  St.  John),  and  St.  Kitts  (Meinert  1886;  Pocock  1896;  Kraepelin 
1903;  Chamberlin  1918,  1921,  1950;  Attems  1930;  Bucherl  1974;  Lewis  1989). 


1  Received  on  July  3,  2004.  Accepted  on  August  3,  2004. 

2  Research  Lab.,  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  4301   Reedy  Creek  Road, 
Raleigh,  North  Carolina  27607  U.S.A.  E-mail:  rowland.shelley(a'ncmail.net. 

'Florida  State  Collection  of  Arthropods,  Division  of  Plant  Industry,  P.  O.  Box  147100,  Gainesville, 
Florida  32614-7100  U.S.A.  E-mail:  edwardg@doacs.state.fl.us. 

A  Opinions  differ  as  to  whether  to  recognize  subspecies  in  R.  longipes.  In  the  "modern  era,"  Attems 
(1930)  recognized  three  races  and  one  variety,  but  Koch  (1985)  synonymized  R.  I.  kitnimUinu 
Chamberlin,  1920,  under  R.  nuda  (Newport,  1845).  Takakuwa  (1935),  Verhoeff  ( 1937).  and  Loksa 
(1971)  proposed  three  new  subspecies  for  forms  from  Asia,  all  summarized  by  Lewis  (2002),  but 
Bucherl  (1974),  Shelley  and  Edwards  (1987),  and  Shelley  (2002)  did  not  recognize  races  at  all.  As 
Lewis'  treatment  (2002)  is  the  most  recent  and  comprehensive,  we  accept  his  assessment  and  assign 
the  Florida  specimens  to  the  nominate  race,  the  only  one  recognized  in  the  Americas. 

Mailed  on  December  21,  2004 


Vol.  115.  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004 117 

No  specimen  of  Otostigmus  has  ever  been  taken  to  the  north,  but  representatives 
of  Rhysida  have  been  intercepted  four  times  in  quarantines  at  US  ports  since 
1937  (Shelley  2002),  and  single  individuals  of/?.  /.  longipes  have  been  encoun- 
tered three  times  in  south  Florida,  in  1956-57  in  Miami  and  South  Miami, 
Miami-Dade  County,  and  in  1962  in  a  home  in  Key  West,  Monroe  County 
(Chamberlin  1958,  Crabill  1960,  Shelley  2002).  Shelley  and  Edwards  (1987) 
therefore  included  R.  1.  longipes  in  their  key  to  Floridian  scolopendromorphs,  but 
as  no  specimens  had  been  encountered  for  40  years,  Shelley  (2002)  concluded 
that  it  had  not  established  reproducing  populations. 

While  it  is  premature  to  rescind  this  conclusion,  there  is  now  reason  to  ques- 
tion it.  On  April  15,  2004,  two  inspectors  from  the  US  Department  of  Agriculture 
discovered  5-6  moderately  large  scolopendrid  centipedes  on  grass  beneath  a 
piece  of  plywood  outside  a  warehouse  in  the  vicinity  of  Hialeah,  Miami-Dade 
County;  this  site  is  some  15  mi  (24  km)  northwest  of  the  Port  of  Miami,  so  the 
centipedes  cannot  be  regarded  as  "interceptions."  Two  individuals  were  captured 
and  sent  to  the  second  author,  where  they  were  accessioned  as  Florida  State 
Collection  of  Arthropods  sample  #£-2004-2872  and  sent  to  the  first  author  for 
determination.  The  centipedes  are  ca.  57  mm  long  and  7  mm  wide,  and  are  a  sub- 
uniform  green  dorsally  that  fades  into  light  olive-brown  on  the  last  three  tergites; 
the  prefemora  of  the  ultimate  legs  are  light  brownish,  and  the  remaining 
podomeres  are  light  green.  They  are  clearly  referrable  to  Rhysida  because  the 
first  tergite  overlaps  the  base  of  the  cephalic  plate;  the  spiracles  are  circular  and 
non-valvular;  and  a  pair  of  spiracles  is  present  on  segment  7.  Key  anatomical  fea- 
tures are  as  follows:  antennae  (both  broken,  left  with  4  antennomeres  and  right 
with  15)  with  three  basalmost  articles  sparsely  hirsute;  teeth  on  coxosternal  tooth 
plates  4+4,  medial  two  on  each  plate  indistinct  and  subequal  in  height;  trochan- 
teroprefemoral  process  long,  apically  subacuminate,  without  additional  teeth; 
dorsal  paramedian  sutures  present  on  tergites  4-20,  lateral  margination  evident 
on  9-21;  ultimate  tergite  smooth,  without  sutures,  strongly  marginate,  edges  ele- 
vated into  low  but  distinct  carinae;  sterna  smooth,  with  short  paramedian  sutures 
arising  from  anterior  margins  on  sternites  3-18  and  weak  caudomedial  depres- 
sions on  7-19;  sternite  21  wider  than  long,  sides  converging  caudally,  caudal 
margin  slightly  concave;  coxopleural  processes  with  three  end  and  one  lateral 
spines  each;  prefemora  of  ultimate  legs  with  ventral,  ventromedial,  and  dorso- 
medial  rows  of  three  equidistantly  spaced  spines  apiece,  distalmost  of  latter  at 
distomedial  corner;  legs  1-4  with  one  short  distal  spine  each  on  anterior  surfaces 
of  tibiae;  1st  tarsi  with  two  ventrodistal  spines  on  legs  1-11  and  one  on  legs  12- 
19;  two  accessory  claws  present  on  legs  1-19.  These  features  are  compatible  with 
the  variation  in  R.  1.  longipes  as  characterized  by  Atterns  (1930)  and  Lewis 
(2002);  based  on  proximity,  the  specimens  are  probably  neotropical  in  origin,  but 
theoretically,  they  could  have  come  from  anywhere  within  the  species'  range, 
which  encompasses  parts  of  the  East  Indies,  Asia,  Indian  Ocean  islands,  and 
Africa  as  well  as  the  Americas  (Lewis  2002).  From  the  circumstances  of  this  dis- 
covery, it  seems  that  the  inspectors  may  have  accidentally  found  representatives 


1 1 8  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


of  a  larger  population  of  this  species  that  lives,  reproduces,  and  is  now  estab- 
lished in  this  region  of  Miami-Dade  County.  Somewhat  simultaneously,  EMV 
(see  Acknowledgments  below)  spotted  a  centipede  with  similar  coloration  out- 
side a  warehouse  in  West  Palm  Beach.  It  eluded  capture  and  may  also  have  been 
R.  1.  longipes,  but  two  native  south  Floridian  scolopendrids  (both  in  the  Scolo- 
pendrinae),  Scolopendra  viridis  Say,  1821,  and  Hemiscolopendra  marginata 
(Say,  1821)  (Shelley  and  Edwards  1987,  Hoffman  and  Shelley  1996,  Shelley 
2002),  are  similar  enough  in  size  and  color  that  a  non-specialist  could  confuse 
these  species.  We  therefore  cannot  say  that  R.  I.  longipes  occurs  in  Palm  Beach 
County  but  note  the  possibility  for  future  reference. 

As  south  Florida  harbors  numerous  non-native  species,  we  place  on  record  the 
fourth  capture  of  these  allochthonous  centipedes,  and  the  first  with  more  than  one 
individual,  because  R.  I.  longipes  may  now  be  an  established  component  of 
regional  ecosystems.  Concerted  sampling  around  the  same  time  of  year  is  need- 
ed in  and  around  Hialeah,  possibly  using  pitfall  traps,  to  attempt  to  gather  addi- 
tional individuals  and  determine  whether  R.  I.  longipes  truly  occupies  this  region 
of  Miami-Dade  County.  Sampling  efforts  to  the  north  will  document  whether  the 
centipede  also  occurs  in  Palm  Beach  County. 

One  individual  has  been  deposited  in  each  author's  institution. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  Eduardo  M.  Varona  and  Mike  Meadows,  USDA  inspectors,  for  collecting  the  specimens 
and  sending  them  to  the  second  author;  J.  G.  E.  Lewis,  for  general  advice  and  reference  citations;  and 
G.  Hodges,  for  a  prepublication  review. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Attems,  C.  1930.  Myriapoda  2.  Scolopendromorpha.  Das  Tierreich  54:1-308. 

Biicherl,  W.  1974.  Die  Scolopendromorpha  der  Neotropischen  Region.  Symposia  of  the  Zoological 
Society  of  London  No.  32:  99-133. 

Chamberlin,  R.  V.  1918.  The  Chilopoda  and  Diplopoda  of  the  West  Indies.  Bulletin  of  the  Museum 
of  Comparative  Zoology  62(5):  1 5 1  -262. 

Chamberlin,  R.  V.  1921.  The  centipeds  of  Central  America.  Proceedings  of  the  U.  S.  National 
Museum  60(7):  1-1 7. 

Chamberlin,  R.  V.  1950.  Some  chilopods  from  Puerto  Rico.  Proceedings  of  the  Biological  Society 
of  Washington  63: 155- 162. 

Chamberlin,  R.  V.  1958.  Some  records  of  chilopods  from  Florida.  Entomological  News  69(1):  13- 
14. 

Crabill,  R.  E.  1960.  A  new  American  genus  of  cryptopid  centipede,  with  an  annotated  key  to  the 
scolopendromorph  genera  from  America  north  of  Mexico.  Proceedings  of  the  United  States 
National  Museum  111:1-15. 

Hoffman,  R.  L.  and  R.  M.  Shelley.  1996.  The  identity  of  Scolopendra  marginata  Say  (Chilopoda: 
Scolopendromorpha:  Scolopendridae).  Myriapodologica  4(5):35-42. 


Vol.  115.  No.  2,  March  &  April  2004 119 


Humbert,  A.  and  H.  de  Saussure.  1870.  Myriapoda  nova  Americana.  Description  de  divers 
Myriapodes  nouveaux  de  musee  de  Vienne.  Revue  et  Magasin  de  Zoologie  22:196-205. 

Koch,  L.  E.  1985.  The  taxonomy  of  Australian  centipedes  of  the  genus  Rhvsida  Wood  (Chilopoda: 
Scolopendridae:  Otostigminae).  Journal  of  Natural  History  19:205-214. 

Kohlrausch,  E.  1 88 1 .  Gattungen  und  Arten  der  Scolopendriden.  Archiv  fur  Naturgeschichte  47:50- 
132. 

Kraepelin,  K.  1903.  Revision  der  Scolopendriden.  Mitteilungen  aus  dem  naturhistorischen  Muse- 
um in  Hamburg  20:1-276. 

Lewis,  J.  G.  E.  1989.  The  scolopendromorph  centipedes  of  St.  John,  U.  S.  Virgin  Islands,  collect- 
ed by  Dr.  W.  B.  Muchmore.  Journal  of  Natural  History  23:1003-1016. 

Lewis,  J.  G.  E.  2002.  The  scolopendromorph  centipedes  of  Mauritius  and  Rodrigues  and  their  adja- 
cent islets  (Chilopoda:  Scolopendromorpha).  Journal  of  Natural  History  36:79-106. 

Lewis,  J.  G.  E.  2003.  The  problems  involved  in  the  characterisation  of  scolopendromorph  species 
(Chilopoda:  Scolopendromorpha).  African  Invertebrates  44(l):61-69. 

Loksa,  I.  1971.  Die  von  K.  Lindberg  in  Afghanistan  gesammelten  Chilopoden.  Senkenbergiana 
Biologica52:103-112. 

Meinert,  F.  1886.  Myriapoda  Musei  Cantabrigensis,  Mass.  Part  I.  Chilopoda.  Proceedings  of  the 
American  Philosophical  Society  23(122):161-232. 

Pocock,  R.  I.  1895-1910.  Chilopoda  and  Diplopoda.  Biologia  Centrali-Americana,  217  pp.  (Fas- 
cicle on  the  Otostigminae  issued  in  January  1896). 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2002.  A  synopsis  of  the  North  American  centipedes  of  the  order  Scolopendromorpha 
(Chilopoda).  Virginia  Museum  of  Natural  History  Memoir  No.  5:1-108. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  and  G.  B.  Edwards.  1987.  The  scolopendromorph  centipedes  of  Florida,  with  an 
introduction  to  the  common  myriapodous  arthropods.  Florida  Department  of  Agriculture  & 
Consumer  Services,  Division  of  Plant  Industry,  Entomology  Circular  No.  300:1-4. 

Takakuwa,  Y.  1935.  Ueber  Neue  Chilopoden  aus  Japan.  Transactions  of  the  Natural  History  So- 
ciety of  Formosa  25(145):339-343. 

Underwood,  L.  M.  1887.  The  Scolopendridae  of  the  United  States.  Entomologica  Americana 
3(4):61-65. 

Verhoeff,  K.  W.  1937.  Chilopoden  aus  Malacca,  nach  den  Objecten  des  Raffles  Museum  in 
Singapore.  I.  Teil  Scolopendromorpha  und  Geophilomorpha.  Bulletin  of  the  Raffles  Museum, 
Singapore  13: 198-239. 

Wood,  H.  C.  1862.  On  the  Chilopoda  of  North  America,  with  a  catalogue  of  all  the  specimens  in 
the  collection  of  the  Smithsonian  Institution.  Journal  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  at 
Philadelphia,  ser.  2,  5:2-52. 


120  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  MARCH  24,  2004 

EVOLUTION  OF  FLEA  BEETLES 
(COLEOPTERA:  CHRYSOMELIDAE) 

Catherine  N.  Duckett 

Department  of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  DC  20560 

In  the  evening  presentation,  Dr.  Catherine  Duckett,  on  an  NSF  Advance 
Fellowship  at  the  Smithsonian  Institution,  demonstrated  the  use  of  phylogenetic 
hypotheses  to  study  the  evolutionary  questions  posed  by  flea  beetles.  Flea  bee- 
tles form  part  of  the  subfamily  Galerucinae  that  is  composed  of  more  than  8000 
species,  and  include  major  agricultural  pests  such  as  Diobrotica  spp.  causing  mil- 
lions of  dollars  of  damage  yearly.  Duckett  presented  three  competing  hypotheses 
of  relationships  for  the  tribes  Alticini  and  Galerucini,  including  one  which 
hypothesizes  that  the  Galerucini  evolved  from  a  jumping  flea-beetle  ancestor. 
Duckett's  molecular  analysis  of  ribosomal  DNA  supported  this  hypothesis — that 
the  flea  beetles  are  not  a  monophyletic  group  because  the  galerucini  evolved 
from  a  species  that  could  jump.  Using  this  supported  hypothesis,  Duckett 
answered  questions  posed  by  flea  beetle  evolutionary  biology,  including  the  evo- 
lution of  pharmacophagy  (adults  selecting  toxic  cucurbitacins  as  defensive  com- 
pounds), prediction  of  identity  for  an  unknown  larval  type,  and  systematic  place- 
ment of  a  newly  discovered,  enigmatic  species. 

In  other  observations  made  by  members  at  the  meeting,  Howard  Boyd  noted 
that  the  bee  Colletes  thoracicus  (Colletidae)  had  been  active  for  nearly  two 
weeks  near  his  home  in  Tabernacle,  NJ.  Notice  was  made  that  Brood  X  of  the 
Periodical  Cicadas  was  expected  this  year  in  a  broad  area  in  eastern  North  Ameri- 
ca, including  the  Philadelphia/Delaware  region.  Dr.  Ron  Romig  received  a  Cer- 
tificate of  Appreciation  from  the  U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture  on  behalf  of  his 
efforts  for  the  Beneficial  Insect  Rearing  Laboratory  in  Newark,  DE.  The  certifi- 
cate was  presented  by  member  Bill  Day,  of  BIRL.  Nearly  22  members  and  visi- 
tors were  present  at  the  meeting. 

Jon  Gelhaus,  President  Secretary  of  the 

American  Entomological  Society  (1997-2003) 

Corresponding  Secretary  of  the 

American  Entomological  Society  (2003-present) 

E-mail:  gelhaus@acnatsci.org. 


Mailed  on  December  21,  2004 


Reviewers.  When  submitting  papers,  all  authors  are  requested  to  provide  the  names  of  two  qual- 
ified individuals  who  have  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  before  it  is  submitted  to  Entomological 
News.  The  receipt  of  all  papers  will  be  acknowledged  and,  if  accepted,  they  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  possible. 

All  papers,  except  book  reviews,  are  forwarded  to  experts  for  final  review  before  acceptance.  In 
order  to  expedite  the  review  process,  authors  are  also  asked  to  suggest  the  name,  address,  email,  tele- 
phone and  fax  of  at  least  three  experts  in  the  subject  field  to  whom  the  manuscript  may  be  forward- 
ed for  additional  review.  Ideally,  the  review  process  should  be  completed  within  30  days.  The  editor 
reserves  his  prerogative  of  sending  the  manuscript  to  other  reviewers.  Authors  are  also  welcome  to 
list  the  names  of  reviewers  to  whom  the  article  should  not  be  sent,  with  a  brief  explanation. 

Upon  return  of  reviews,  authors  will  be  asked  to  modify  or  rewrite  their  texts  to  accommodate 
suggestions  of  the  reviewers  and  the  editor  as  well  as  to  conform  to  requirements  of  Entomological 
News.  If  authors  do  not  modify  their  texts,  they  should  specifically  address,  on  a  point  by  point  basis, 
why  they  are  not  doing  that. 

Page  Proofs.  The  printer  will  send  page  proofs  to  the  editor  and  the  business  manager.  Faith 
Kuehn.  Then,  the  proofs  will  be  sent  to  the  corresponding  author  as  .pdf  files,  together  with  the 
reprint  order  form  as  an  .rtf  file.  Authors  must  process  proofs  and  return  them  to  the  editor  and  to  the 
business  editor  by  air  mail  or  e-mail  (attachment).  Authors  who  anticipate  being  absent  are  urged  to 
provide  forwarding  addresses  or  to  provide  temporary  addresses  (with  dates).  Proofs  not  approved 
within  one  week  will  be  published  as  is.  The  editor  will  collect  the  page  proofs  and  send  them  to  the 
printer. 

Page  and  Reprint  Charges.  Charges  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  are  US$25.00  per 
printed  page  (or  part)  for  members  and  US$30.00  per  printed  page  (or  part)  for  nonmembers.  Authors 
will  be  charged  for  all  text  figures  and  halftones  at  the  rate  of  US$30.00  each,  regardless  of  size. 
These  charges  were  approved  by  the  American  Entomological  Society  Council  for  the  2003-2004 
United  States  Fiscal  year.  Authors  will  pay  for  color  printing  at  the  going  rate.  There  are  no  discounts. 
There  are  no  page  charges  for  book  reviews.  Page  and  reprint  charges  will  be  billed  by  Faith  Kuehn. 
to  whom  communications  and  remittances  of  page  charges  and  reprints  should  be  sent.  FK  address 
is:  3789  Foulk  Road,  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania  19061  U.S.A.  E-mail:  fbkuehn@yahoo.com. 

Articles  longer  than  20  printed  pages  of  Entomological  News  may  be  published  in  two  or  more 
installments,  unless  the  author  is  willing  to  pay  the  entire  cost  of  a  sufficient  number  of  additional 
pages  in  any  one  issue  to  enable  such  an  article  to  appear  without  division. 

It  hard  copy  reprints  are  desired,  they  must  be  ordered  together  with  the  proofs.  Reprints  as  .pdf 
files  are  available  for  the  authors.  For  options  and  charges,  contact  the  business  manager. 

Entomological  News  is  printed  by  Dover  Litho  Printing  Company.  1211  North  DuPont  Highway, 
Dover,  Delaware  19901  U.S.A.  Telephone  (302)  678-121 1;  fax:  (302)  678-8091;  toll-free  telephone 
(800)366-9132;  Web  Page:  www.doverlitho.com.  Dover  Litho  has  been  recognized  by  DENREC  and 
DELRAP  Green  Industries  as  "The  Most  Environmentally  Conscious  Printer  in  the  State  of  Dela- 
ware." 

Entomological  News  is  available  in  microform  from  ProQuest  Information  and  Learning.  Call 
toll-free  (800)  521-3042,  (800)  521-0600.  (734)  761-4700.  Mail  inquiry  to:  ProQuest  Information 
and  Learning,  300  North  Zeeb  Road,  Ann  Arbor,  Michigan  48106-9866  U.S.A. 

Entomological  News  is  listed  in  the  Science  Citation  Index  Expanded. 


,??"«  5?.?  *N  INSTITUTION  LIBRARIES 


BOOK  REVIEW 


39088011184868 


FOSSIL  REVOLUTION.  THE  FINDS  THAT  CHANGED  OUR  VIEWS  OF  THE  PAST. 
Douglas  Palmer.  2003.  Collins,  an  imprint  of  Harper  Collins  Publishers,  Ltd.  77-85 
Fulham  Palace  Road,  London,  England,  United  Kingdom.  144  pp.  Hardcover.  ISBN  0-00- 

7118287. 

I  could  not  stop  reading  Palmer's  Fossil  Revolution.  This  abundantly  illustrated  book  goes  to  the  heart  of  the 
issue:  how  old  are  the  Earth  and  its  inhabitants?  This  work  is  filled  with  fascinating  nuggets  of  cultural/scien- 
tific historiography;  the  noble  along  with  the  less  than  virtuous.  Some  of  these  include  Brogniarts's  progressive 
views  on  fossil  plants  -  some  with  possible  insect  damage  -  as  global  climate  indicators,  the  story  behind  the 
"beast  of  Maastricht,"  the  presence  of  mammoths  in  Wrangel  Island  (Siberian  Arctic)  during  the  construction  of 
the  Egyptian  pyramids  (4,000-5,000  years  before  the  present),  the  trafficking  on  fossils,  Mary  Anning,  Jr.  along 
with  numerous  men  and  their  roles  in  paleobiology,  the  origin  of  names  currently  used  in  the  geological  time 
table,  Linne  as  the  type  of  H.  sapiens,  the  creatures  in  Linne's  Anthropomorpha,  the  effect  of  the  European 
Industrial  Revolution  in  geology  and  paleobiology,  the  18th  and  19th  century  views  of  "amateurs"  and  "profes- 
sionals," dinosaur  tracks  (http://www.isgs.uiuc.edu/dinos/dinotracks.html),  and  others. 

Through  examples,  the  book  also  provokes  a  thoughtful  reflection  on  how,  as  a  community  of  scientific  prac- 
titioners, geologists  and  paleobiologists  were  strongly  influenced  by  views  of  western  religious  organizations, 
particularly  those  of  Christendom  regarding  temporal  issues.  As  numerous  scientific  discoveries  began  shatter- 
ing the  belief  in  a  relatively  young  Earth,  scientists  started  to  abandon  a  modus  operand!  in  which  faith  would 
have  had  the  last  word  while  reason  obeyed.  Palmer  provides  instances  of  fossils  (e.g.  the  skulls  of  extinct  large 
proboscideans,  deemed  to  be  remnants  of  former  giants,  or  a  giant  fossil  salamander,  described  as  Homo  delu- 
vii  testis  Scheuchzer,  "a  human  who  witnesses  the  deluge")  that  were  incorrectly  interpreted  as  hard  evidence 
for  the  existence  of  the  nephilims  (Genesis  6:4)  and  other  sinners  who  died  in  a  universal  Noachian  deluge.  The 
paleobiological  literature  of  the  nineteenth  century  is  filled  with  cases  of  respected  scientists  who  explained  the 
presence  of  plants  and  their  herbivorous  insects  in  coal  measures  in  terms  of  a  global  pluvial  catastrophe.  Similar 
contemporaneous  beliefs  include  the  claim  of  some  modem  creationists  that  layers  of  fossilized  strata  are  pro- 
duced in  months,  or  that  genuine  amber  and  their  biological  inclusions  are  thousands  of  years  old,  or  that  there 
are  just  a  few  hundred  biological  "species"  on  Earth,  or  that  huge  vertebrates  may  still  roam  in  a  remote  unex- 
plored jungle  or  a  body  of  water.  Even  "illuminated"  Thomas  Jefferson,  third  President  of  the  United  States, 
hoped  for  the  existence  of  living  dinosaur-sized  vertebrates  in  North  America  when  he  sent  Lewis  and  Clark 
westward. 

Extending  the  discussion  on  radiometric  techniques  (http://www.gate.net/~rwms/AgeEarth.html)  and  greatly 
expanding  the  "Further  Reading"  section  would  have  increased  the  value  of  this  book.  Although  most  illustra- 
tions in  Fossil  Revolution  are  well  selected  and  helpful,  adding  to  its  broad  perspective,  the  images  depicting 
insects  in  amber  (pp.  137-139)  leave  a  lot  to  be  desired.  I  noted  very  few  errors  and  a  rather  memorable  contro- 
versial statement,  perhaps  a  lapsus,  "...the  fossil  record  does  not  preserve  flowering  plants  until  late  Jurassic 
times"  (p.  44).  After  reading  Fossil  Revolution,  one  wonders  why  the  clash  between  systems  of  thinking  still 
seems  to  be  so  vociferous  in  the  west.  How  have  these  issues  been  "solved,"  if  at  all,  in  other  civilizations? 

Fossil  Revolution  is  an  excellent  read  for  anyone  interested  in  the  history  of  ideas  and  would  make  an  excel- 
lent selection  for  interdisciplinary  college  courses.  This  novel  interpretation  of  the  fossil  record  also  revolution- 
ized our  world's  view  about  the  age  of  the  Earth  and  its  inhabitants.  Given  appropriate  technology  and  previous 
knowledge,  one  can  understand  and,  sometimes,  predict  natural  phenomena.  Nothing  surpasses  the  constant  pur- 
suit of  the  "ground  truth." 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay 

Department  of  Paleobiology 

MRC-121,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History 

Smithsonian  Institution,  P.O.  Box  37012 

Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20013-7012  U.S.A. 

E-mail:  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu. 


Mailed  on  December  21,  2004 


•-id)  I 


MAY  &  JUNE  2004 


USISSN  0013-872X 
No.  3 


NTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


specific  synonyms  and  records  of  North  American  Centroptilum  and 
Procloeon  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae) 

N.  A.  Wiersema  and  W.  P.  McCafferty    121 

"Supermale"  caddisflies  (Trichoptera:  Hydropsychidae,  Philopotamidae)  from 
the  North  Central  United  States  David  C.  Houghton    129 

Two  new  species  of  Ethmia  Hiibner  from  China  (Lepidoptera:  Elachistidae: 

Ethmiinae)  Shu-Xia  Wang  and  Hou-Hun  Li    135 

A  new  small  minnow  mayfly  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae)  from  Utah,  U.S.A. 

N.  A.  Wiersema,  C.  R.  Nelson,  and  K,  E  Kuehnl    139 


A  winter  pitfall  technique  for  winter-active  subnivean  fauna 


R  Paquin    146 


Crossocerus  flavomaculatus,  a  new  species  of  the  subgenus  Acanthocrabro  from 
China,  with  a  key  to  the  Chinese  species  of  the  subgenus 
(Hymenoptera:  Apoidea:  Crabronidae)  Qiang  Li  and  Junhua  He    157 


Not  knowing  is  gnawing  at  me 


Frederick  B.  Getze    162 


A  new  species  of  Oxycera  Meigen  (Diptera:  Stratiomyidae)  from  Turkey 

Turgay  Ustuner  and  Abdullah  Hasbenli    163 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTES: 

An  overlooked  family-group  name  for  termites  (Isoptera) 

Michael  S.  Engel  and  Kumar  Krishna    168 

On  the  identity  of  Halictus  cubensis  Spinola,  1851  (Hymenoptera:  Halictidae) 

Michael  S.  Engel    169 

Two  new  orthopteran  hosts  of  North  American  Polideini  (Diptera:  Tachinidae) 

James  E,  O'Hara  and  David  A.  Gray    171 

Distributional  records  of  Cataractocoris  (Heteroptera:  Naucoridae)  in 

Mesoamerica  Robert  W.  Sites    173 

New  host  record  for  Urosigalphus  mimosestes  Gibson  and  first  record  of 
U.  neomexicanus  Crawford  (Hymenoptera:  Braconidae)  in  Mexico 

Victor  Lopez-Martinez,  J-  /.  Figueroa-De  la  Rosa, 
J.  Romero  N.,  J.  A.  Sanchez  G.,  and  S.  Anaya  R.    175 

Perustigmus  and  Perustigminae  Verhoeff,  1941,  invalid  genus-  and  family-group 
names  in  the  centipede  family  Scolopendridae  (Scolopendromorpha) 

Rowland  M.  Shelley  and  Amazonas  Chagas,  Jr.    178 

BOOK  REVIEW: 

Pest  and  vector  control  by  H.  F.  van  Emden  and  M.  W.  Service  (Editors) 

Thomas  G.  Shanover    180 


AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY  BUSINESS: 

Society  Meeting  of  April  28,  2004 


Jon  Gelhaus 

Back  Cover 


THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

MAILED  ON  JANUARY  19,  2005 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS,  THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY,  AND 
NEW  GUIDELINES  FOR  AUTHORS  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 

Entomological  News  is  published  bimonthly  except  July-August  by  The  American  Entomological 
Society,  which  is  headquartered  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway, 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1 195  United  States  of  America.  AES  can  be  reached,  as  follows:  lelephone  (215) 
561-3978;  fax  (215)  299-1028;  e-mail,  aes@acnatsci.org  and  website:  http://www.  acnatsci.org/hosted/aes. 
Information  on  the  Calvert  Award  for  insect-related  study  by  a  young  person  in  the  Delaware  Valley  region 
sponsored  by  The  American  Entomological  Society  can  be  found  at:  http://www.udel.edu/chem/white/ 
Odonata/Cal  vert  Awd  .html 

Subscriptions  to  and  Back  Issues  of  Entomological  News.  Private  subscriptions  for  personal  use  of 
members  of  the  society  are  US  $15  per  year  prepaid.  Subscriptions  for  institutions,  such  as  libraries,  lab- 
oratories, etc.  and  nonmembers,  are  US  $30  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  in  the  USA  and  US  $34  per 
year  prepaid  for  those  located  outside  the  USA.  Back  issues  when  available  are  sold  by  complete  volume, 
for  US  $15  to  members,  and  US  $30  to  nonmembers.  Membership  /  subscription  application  and  additional 
information  is  available  at:  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/  subscription.html.  Please  send  inquiries  or 
send  completed  membership  form  to:  Office  Manager  at  the  address  above,  e-mail:  aes@say.acnatsci.org, 
or  call  (2 15)  56 1-3978. 

Previous  editors  of  Entomological  News:  1890  Eugene  Murray- Aaron  (1852-1940);  1890-1910 
Henry  Skinner  (1861-1926);  191 1-1944  Philip  P.  Calvert  ( 1871-1961 );  1945-1967  R.G.  Schmieder  (1898- 
1967);  1968-1972  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.  (1919-1999);  1973-1974  R.W.  Lake;  1974-2002  Howard  P.  Boyd; 
2002-2003  F.  Christian  Thompson  and  Michael  Pogue. 

New  Guidelines  for  authors  of  Entomological  News: 

Further  guidelines  can  be  found  on 
http://www.geocities.coni/entomologicalnews/instructions.htm 

Subject  Coverage:  Entomology,  sensu  lato.  Manuscripts  on  systematics,  ecology,  evolution,  mor- 
phology, physiology,  behavior,  biodiversity,  conservation,  paleobiology,  and  other  aspects  of  insect  and 
terrestrial  arthropod  life  as  well  as  nomenclature,  biographies  and  history  of  entomology,  among  others, 
are  appropriate  topics  for  papers  submitted  to  Entomological  News.  Papers  on  applied,  economic,  and  reg- 
ulatory entomology  or  on  toxicology  and  related  subjects  will  be  considered  only  if  they  also  make  a  major 
contribution  in  one  of  the  aforementioned  fields. 

Any  author  may  submit  papers.  Manuscripts  will  be  accepted  from  any  author,  although,  papers 
from  members  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  are  given  priority.  It  is  suggested  that  all  prospec- 
tive authors  join  the  AES. 

Send  manuscripts,  books  for  review,  and  editorial  correspondence  to  the  editor.  All  manuscripts, 
including  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews,  submitted  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  as  well  as 
all  associated  editorial  communications  must  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay  at  this  address: 
Department  of  Paleobiology.  MRC-121 ,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History.  Smithsonian  Institution,  P. 
O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  D.C.  20013-7012  U.S.A.  If  an  author  uses  a  mailing  service  that  does  not 
accept  addresses  with  a  P.  O.  Box,  please  use  this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  West  Loading  Dock,  Washington,  District 
of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  Other  means  of  contacting  the  Editor  are,  as  follows:  Phone:  (202)  633-1383, 
Fax:  (202)  786-2832,  e-mails:  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu,  or  blayj@hotmail.com,  or  via  the  webpage  at 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/contact.  htm.  Books  for  review  should  also  be  sent  to  the 
editor  who  will,  in  turn,  give  them  to  a  colleague  for  review. 

Agreement.  By  submitting  a  paper  for  publication,  authors  tacitly  agree  to  not  submit  in  parallel  the 
same  manuscript  to  another  journal!  For  published  papers,  authors  agree  to  accept  responsibility  for  all 
page,  illustration,  and  requested  reprint  charges.  Rejected  manuscripts  will  be  discarded,  except  for  origi- 
nal artwork  and  photographs,  which  will  be  returned  to  the  authors. 

Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews.  These  are  much  shorter  contributions,  typically  not  exceeding 
two  printed  pages.  The  main  difference  between  these  types  of  contributions  and  longer  papers  is  that  sci- 
entific notes  and  book  reviews  lack  an  abstract  and  most  of  the  main  headings,  except  for  the  acknowl- 
edgments and  the  literature  cited  sections. 

Postmaster:  If  undeliverable,  please  send  to 

The  American  Entomological  Society  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway  /  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

THIRD  CLASS  POSTAGE  PAID  AT  DOVER,  DELAWARE  19901  U.S.A. 


Vol.  115,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 


NEW  SPECIFIC  SYNONYMS  AND  RECORDS  OF 

NORTH  AMERICAN  CENTROPTILUM  AND 
PROCLOEON  (EPHEMEROPTERA:  BAETIDAE)1 

N.  A.  Wiersema2  and  W.  P.  McCafferty3 

ABSTRACT:  Eight  species  of  North  American  Baetidae  are  placed  as  subjective  junior  synonyms  as 
follows:  among  Centroptilum,  C.  album  [=  C.  convexum  and  C.  walshi,  n.  syns.],  C.  bifurcation  [=  C. 
selandreorum,  n.  syn.],  C.  asperatum  [=  C.  elsa  and  C.  oreophiium.  n.  syns.],  among  Prodoeon,  P. 
ingens  [=  P.  imp/icutitm,  n.  syn.],  P.  rufostrigatum  [=  P.  hobbsi,  n.  syn.],  and  P.  viridoculare  [=  P. 
irmbnim,  n.  syn.].  Eighteen  USA  state  records  for  eight  species  of  Centroptilum  and  21  state  records 
and  one  Canadian  province  record  for  eight  species  of  Prodoeon  are  included  among  the  17  species 
reviewed  and  the  67  new  North  American  collection  records  cited.  Certain  previously  incorrect  records 
are  reassigned. 

KEYWORDS:  Ephemeroptera,  Baetidae,  Centroptilum.  Prodoeon.  new  synonyms 

A  study  of  the  North  American  Baetidae  genera  Centroptilum  Eaton  and  Pro- 
doeon Bengtsson  (sometimes  referred  to  as  long-clawed  baetids)  revealed  a  num- 
ber of  new  specific  synonyms  and  considerable  new  distributional  data.  This  infor- 
mation is  detailed  here  along  with  reassignments  of  some  previously  published 
collection  records.  New  species  descriptions  and  diagnoses  and  keys  to  all  North 
American  species  of  Centroptilum  and  Prodoeon  will  be  taken  up  elsewhere. 

New  data  are  given  here  for  17  species  presented  alphabetically.  Specific  syn- 
onymies for  each  species  are  given,  including  eight  new  synonyms  for  six  of  the 
species.  A  majority  of  the  67  new  collection  citations,  including  19  of  the  39  new 
state  and  provincial  records,  are  based  on  materials  from  the  Purdue  Entomologi- 
cal Research  Collection  (PERC).  Three  of  these  39  records  are  based  on  correct- 
ed assignments  of  previously  published  locale  data.  Other  collections  that  have 
been  the  source  of  new  records  or  other  materials  examined  are  Colorado  State 
University  (CSU),  Cornell  University  (CU),  Florida  A  &  M  University  (FAMU), 
personal  collections  of  L.  S.  Long  (LSL),  Massachusetts  Audubon  Society 
(MAS),  Missouri  Department  of  Natural  Resources  (MDNR),  Snow  Museum  of 
Entomology  (SME),  personal  collection  of  R.  S.  Sarver  (RS),  and  personal  col- 
lection of  N.  A.  Wiersema  (NAW). 

CENTROPTILVM 
Centroptilum  album  McDu 

Centroptilum  album  McDunnough,  1926:189 

Centroptilum  wal.shi  McDunnough,  1929:173,  NEW  SYNONYM 

Centroptilum  convexum  Ide,  1930:222,  NEW  SYNONYM 


1  Received  on  July  19,  2002.  Accepted  on  July  1 7.  2004. 

:  MFG.  Inc.,  Consulting  Scientist  and  Engineers,  4807  Spicewood  Springs  Road,  Austin,  Texas  78759 
U.S.A.  E-mails:  Nick. Wiersema(«  mfgenv.com. 

'Department  of  Entomology,  Purdue  University,  West  Lafayette.  Indiana  47907  U.S.A.  E-mail: 
pat_mccafferty(fl  entm.purdue.edu. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


122  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Records.  MASSACHUSETTS:  Franklin  Co,  East  Branch  North  R,  VI-23-1995  (larvae,  MAS). 
OREGON:  Lane  Co,  Cummins  Cr  nr  Neptune  St  Park,  VIII-25-1954  GF  Edmunds,  and  Benton  Co, 
no  other  data  (larvae,  PERC).  TENNESSEE:  Williamson  Co,  Holt  Cr  at  Edmundson  Pike,  III- 18- 
1995  (larvae,  PERC). 

Remarks.  Examination  of  numerous  larvae  and  adults  throughout  much  of 
North  America  has  demonstrated  that  species  concepts  of  C.  walshi  and  C.  con- 
vexum  include  intergrading  color  variants  of  C.  album.  Larvae  and  adults  that 
have  been  attributed  to  the  above  names  are  structurally  indistinguishable.  Cen- 
troptilum  album  is  one  of  the  most  geographically  widespread  and  commonly 
collected  species  of  long-clawed  baetids  in  North  America. 


Centroptilum  asperatum  Traver 

Centroptilum  asperatum  Traver,  1935:708 
Centroptilum  elsa  Traver,  1935:713,  NEW  SYNONYM 
Centroptilum  oreophilum  Edmunds,  1954:1,  NEW  SYNONYM 

Material  Examined.  Centroptilum  elsa.  HOLOTYPE:  reared  male  adult,  Wyoming:  Moose, 
VII-30-1929,  EB  Knots  (No.  1360.1,  CU);  PARATYPES:  two  males,  same  data  as  holotype  (No. 
1360.3  and  4,  CU).  Centroptilum  asperatum,  HOLOTYPE:  male  adult  with  subimaginal  exuviae, 
California:  Big  Bear  L,  San  Bernardino  Mts,  VIII-29-1932,  CD  Michener  (No.  1359.1,  CU).  Baetis 
No.  1  Seemann,  reared  female  adults,  California:  Cobil's  Canyon,  nr  Claremont,  Seemann  (CU); 
larva,  Napa  Co,  Capelle  Cr  at  Rt  128,2.1  miNjctRt  121,  1-27-1994,  BC  Kondratieff  (CSU). 

Remarks.  Our  study  indicated  that  the  type  concept  of  C.  elsa  represents 
small,  pale,  late  summer  emergents  of  C.  asperatum.  In  addition,  no  reliable 
characteristics  have  been  found  to  distinguish  C.  oreophilum  from  C  elsa.  This 
is  a  strictly  western  North  American  species.  It  also  includes  Seemann's  Baetis 
No.  1  taken  from  Riverside  County,  California  (Seemann  1927)  and  the  Cali- 
fornia locales  cited  above. 


Centroptilum  bifurcatum  McDunnough 

Centroptilum  bifurcatum  McDunnough,  1924:96 

Centroptilum  selanderorum  Edmunds,  1954:2,  NEW  SYNONYM 

Records.  KANSAS:  Douglas  Co,  Kansas  R  at  Eudora  Bridge,  VI1I-24-1978,  P.  Liechti  (larvae, 
SME).  KENTUCKY:  Montgomery  Co,  Slate  Cr  at  Cooks  Branch  Rd,  .9  km  SSW  jet  Ky  460  and  7 1 3, 
VII- 19- 1983,  and  Taylor  Co,  Robinson  Cr,  .75  km  SWjct  Ky  70  and  337  at  Mannsville,  VII-27-1983 
(larvae,  PERC).  WASHINGTON:  Benton  Co,  Richland,  IX- 18- 1998,  R  Newell  (adult,  NAW). 

Remarks.  Initial  evidence  of  the  equivalency  of  C.  selanderorum  (known  as 
adults)  and  C.  bifurcatum  was  presented  by  McCafferty  et  al.  (1993).  The  exam- 
ination of  considerable  additional  materials  since  that  time  has  confirmed  that 
genitalic  form  and  coloration  associated  with  C.  selanderorum  (Edmunds  1954) 
represents  variability  found  within  or  between  populations  of  the  relatively  wide- 
spread, mainly  midwestern  and  western  C.  bifurcatum.  The  new  Kansas  and 
Kentucky  records  of  this  species  extend  the  known  midwestern  range  (e.g.,  Ran- 
dolph and  McCafferty  1998)  south  and  into  the  fringe  of  the  Southeast. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 123 

Centroptilum  conturbatum  McDunnough 

Centroptilum  conturbatum  McDunnough  1929:171 

Records.  ARIZONA:  Yavapai  Co.,  Spring  Cr,  8  mi  SW  Cedona,  1  mi  off  US  89A,  3500',  T16N, 
R4E,  center,  SW/4,  V-06-1981,  and  Red  Tank  Draw,  1.5  mi  E  1-17  &  AZ  279,  on  Rd  #  618,  E 
Montezuma  Well  Nat  Mon,  3780',  V-04-1981,  WU  Brigham,  AR  Brigham,  MW  Sanderson  (larvae, 
PERC).  COLORADO:  Jackson  Co,  Roaring  Fork  R  at  Co  Rd  5  bridge,  VII1-22-1991,  R  Durfee,  and 
Douglas  Co,  Cherry  Cr,  bank/bw  Castlewood  Canyon  St  Prk,  VII- 17- 1997,  A  Polonsky,  R  Durfee 
(larvae,  CSU). 

Remarks.  This  species  is  known  from  central  and  western  Canada  south 
through  the  intermountain  western  USA. 


Centroptilum  minor  McDunnough 

Cloeon  minor  McDunnough,  1926:190 

Records.  ALABAMA:  Elmore  Co,  Sofkahatchee  Cr,  IX- 16- 1987,  S  Harris,  and  Dekalb  Co,  W. 
frk  Little  R  at  Desota  St  Prk,  VI-22-1988,  KS  Eraser,  and  Clay  Co,  Cheaha  Cr  at  For  Rd  637,  2.7  mi 
W  L  Chinnabee,  VI-OI-1988,  S  Harris  (male  adults,  CSU).  MISSOURI:  Maries  Co,  Gasconade  R  nr 
Hwy  63  bridge,  V-03-1989,  S  Humphrey  (larvae,  MDNR).  NORTH  CAROLINA:  Randolph  Co, 
Little  Brushy  Cr  at  St  Rd  1005,  V- 18- 1990  (larva,  NAW).  TEXAS:  Montgomery  Co,  Peach  Cr  at  US 
59,  N  New  Caney,  20°  12'  1 1  N,  095°  1 1'  07  W,  IV- 19- 1999,  and  Walker  Co,  Sandy  Cr,  E  Huntsville 
St  Prk,  30°  37'  52  N,  095°  31'  15  W,  11-24-1999,  and  Waller  Co,  Ponds  Cr  at  Hwy  290,  IX- 17,27- 
1997,  NA  Wiersema  (larvae  and  reared  females,  NAW). 

Remarks.  This  is  an  eastern  species  that  in  the  south  extends  westward  to 
Missouri  and  Texas. 


Centroptilum  ozarkensum  Wiersema  &  Burian 

Centroptilum  ozarkensum  Wiersema  and  Burian,  2000: 1 77 

Records.  TENNESSEE:  Cannon  Co,  East  Fork  Stones  R  at  headwaters,  VI-07-1997,  and 
Williamson  Co,  Holt  Cr  at  Edmundson  Prk,  111-19-1995,  LS  Long  (larvae  and  exuviae,  NAW). 

Remarks.  This  species  is  currently  known  only  from  Missouri  and  Tennessee. 

Centroptilum  triangulifer  McDunnough 

Cloeon  triangulifer  McDunnough,  1931:88 

Records.  ARKANSAS:  Boone  Co,  Bear  Cr  at  St  Rd  14,  V-28-1974,  WP  McCafferty,  AV 
Provonsha,  L  Dersch  (female  adult,  PERC).  FLORIDA:  Calhoun  Co,  Chipola  R  at  Hwy  20,  1-20- 
1974  PH  Carlson  (larva,  FAMU).  IOWA:  Chickasaw  Co,  East  Fork  of  the  Wapsipinicon  R  2.5  mi 
NE  of  North  Washington  &  N  of  150th  St.  Bridge,  X-03-2002  (larvae,  PERC). 

Remarks.  This  species  is  found  generally  in  the  eastern  half  of  the  continent 
and  extends  westward  into  the  Southwest  as  far  as  Oklahoma  and  Texas. 


Centroptilum  victoriae  McDunnough 

Centroptilum  victoriae  McDunnough  1938:27 


124  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Records.  INDIANA:  La  Grange  Co,  Pigeon  Cr  at  1 100  E,  VI-10-1974,  L  Dersch,  D  Tyler  (exu- 
viae, PERC).  MICHIGAN:  Marquette  Co,  Lower  Elm  Cr  .25  mi  SW  Ives  L  Stone  House,  VII-9-11- 
1985,  WP  McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  and  Pine  River  at  bridge  on  Huron  Mtn  Club  Compound  Rd, 
VI-2-5-1986,  WP  McCafferty  (larva,  PERC).  VERMONT:  Windhams  Co,  North  Brook  at  W  Edge 
of  Wilmington,  VI-20-1976,  WP  McCafferty.  AV  Provonsha,  and  M  Minno  (larvae,  PERC). 

Remarks.  This  species  was  first  reported  in  name  from  the  USA  by  McCaf- 
ferty et  al.  (2002)  in  their  inventory  of  Iowa  mayflies.  Reexamination  of  Maine 
material  upon  which  the  report  of  C.  semirufum  McDunnough  by  Burian  and 
Gibbs  (1991)  was  based,  revealed  that  it  was  referable  to  C.  victoriae.  As  a  result, 
C.  semirufum  is  currently  known  in  the  USA  only  from  the  state  of  Pennsylvania 
(Jacobus  and  McCaffery  2001).  Historically,  C.  victoriae  has  been  known  pri- 
marily from  central  and  eastern  Canada. 


PROCLOEON 
Procloeon  ingens  McDunnough 

Cloeon  ingens  McDunnough,  1923:44 

Cloeon  implicatum  McDunnough,  1924:1 13,  NEW  SYNONYM 

Procloeon  implicatum  (McDunnough),  NEW  SYNONYM 

Remarks.  We  have  found  P.  implicatum  indistinguishable  from  P.  ingens.  Also,  reexamination  of 
material  reported  as  P.  mendax  (Walsh)  from  Marquette  County,  Michigan,  by  Randolph  and 
McCafferty  (1998)  showed  it  to  be  referable  to  C.  ingens.  This  species  is  known  from  Alberta  and 
the  Yukon,  east  across  Canada  and  also  from  a  few  USA  states,  including  Colorado,  Maine,  and  now 
Michigan. 


Procloeon  mendax  Walsh 

Cloeon  mendax  Walsh,  1862:381 

Remarks.  Leonard  and  Leonard  (1962)  mentioned  Cloeon  sp.  from  a  small  tributary  of  the  Au 
Sable  River  in  Crawford  County,  Michigan.  Examination  of  this  material  and  the  figure  of  the  geni- 
talia  of  this  species  presented  by  Leonard  and  Leonard  (1962),  demonstrated  it  as  referable  to  P.  men- 
dax, which  otherwise  is  represented  in  Michigan  only  in  an  old  report  from  Detroit  (Wayne  County) 
by  Eaton  (1887).  The  species  has  been  reported  infrequently  from  northeastern  and  midwestern  North 
America. 


Procloeon  nelsoni  Wiersema 

Procloeon  nelsoni  Wiersema,  1999:27 

Records.  TENNESSEE:  Rutherford  Co,  West  Fork  Stones  R  at  Barfield,  IV-22-1997,  and 
Panther  Cr  at  Panther  Cr  Rd,  VI-08-1997,  and  Panther  Cr  at  Walnut  Grove  Rd/Panther  Cr  Rd,  IV-27- 
1997,  and  Williamson  Co,  unnamed  trib  of  Mill  Cr  at  Rock  Springs  Rd  and  Clovercroft,  IV-07-1997, 
LS  Long  (larvae,  female  adults,  some  reared,  LSL). 

Remarks.  Reexamination  of  the  larva  informally  referred  to  as  Procloeon  sp. 
3  from  Texas  by  McCafferty  and  Davis  (1992)  revealed  that  is  was  referable  to 
P.  nelsoni.  This  species  is  currently  known  only  from  Texas  and  Tennessee. 


Vol.  115,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 125 


Procloeon  pennulatum  Eaton 

Centroptilum pennulatum  Eaton,  1870:2 
Centroptilum  infrequens  McDunnough,  1924:98 

Records.  ARKANSAS:  Scott  Co,  Johnson  Cr  at  Johnson  Cr  Rd  nr  US  Hwy  71.  8  mi  N  Mena, 
VI- 1-1974,  WP  McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  L  Dersch  (larvae,  PERC).  COLORADO:  Moffat  Co, 
Yampa  R  at  Echo  Prk,  Dinosaur  Nat  Mon,  IX-03-1994,  BC  Kondratieff,  R  Durfee  (reared  adults, 
NAW).  NEVADA:  Elko  Co,  Humbolt  R  at  Elko,  VIII-29-1965,  SL  and  JW  Jensen  (larva,  PERC). 
TENNESSEE:  Cannon  Co,  Carson  Frk  at  Burt  Burgen  Rd  and  Todd's  Cemetery,  VIII-27-1997  (exu- 
viae, NAW). 

Remarks.  This  widespread  Holarctic  species  was  first  recognized  in  North 
America  by  Lowen  and  Flannagan  (1990)  by  way  of  synonymizing  C.  infrequens 
with  it.  The  species  is  now  known  from  all  North  American  regions  excluding  the 
extreme  southwestern  USA  and  Mexico  (see  also  comments  under  P.  rivulare, 
below). 


Procloeon  rivulare  Traver 

Centroptilum  rivulare  Traver,  1935:716 

Records.  CONNECTICUT:  New  Haven  Co,  Seymour,  Bladden's  Brk,  at  Rt  67  and  Skokorat  Rd, 
VII-22-1996,  SK  Burian  (larvae,  NAW).  MASSACHUSETTS:  Hampshire  Co,  Mill  R,  Arcadia 
Sanctuary,  Easthampton,  VIII-01-1991  (larvae,  MAS).  MISSISSIPPI:  Perry  Co,  Leaf  River, 
31/13/03N  87/03/47W,  VII-2000  (PERC).  TENNESSEE:  Polk  Co,  Lost  Cr  at  Lost  Cr  Campgr  nr 
Ocoee  R,  III-5-1994,  and  Rutherford  Co,  West  Fork  Stones  R  at  Barfield,  IV-22-1997,  LS  Long  (lar- 
vae, LSL).  VERMONT:  Windhams  Co,  small  spring  at  North  Brk  at  W  edge  of  Wilmington,  VI-20- 
1976,  WP  McCafferty.  AV  Provonsha,  M  Minno  (larva,  PERC).  VIRGINIA:  Highland  Co,  Back  Cr 
at  Va  Hwy  84,  V-05-1968  (larva,  PERC). 

Remarks.  Reexamination  of  materials  reported  as  P.  pennulatum  from  North 
Carolina  by  McCafferty  (1993)  and  New  Brunswick  by  McCafferty  and  Ran- 
dolph (1998)  are  referable  to  P.  rivulare.  This  species  is  known  from  far  eastern 
Canada  (New  Brunswick  and  Nova  Scotia),  through  the  Appalachian  chain  in  the 
USA,  and  westward  in  Kentucky,  Indiana,  Mississippi,  and  Ohio. 


Procloeon  rubropictum  McDunnough 

Cloeon  rubropictum  McDunnough,  1923:43 

Records.  MISSOURI:  Bellinger  Co,  Little  Whitewater  R,  IX-22-1999.  and  Hickory  Co,  Little 
Niangra  R,  IX- 17- 1996,  and  Reynolds  Co,  E  Frk  Black  R.  IX-2 1-1999,  and  Shannon  Co,  Pea  Vine 
Hollow,  V- 16-2001,  and  St.  Clair  Co,  Brushy  Cr.  1X-20-1995  (larvae,  MDNR).  TENNESSEE: 
Rutherford  Co,  West  Fork  Stones  R  at  Barfield,  I V-22- 1 997,  and  Panther  Cr  at  Panther  Cr  Rd,  VI-08- 
1997,  LS  Long  (larvae  and  female  adult,  LSL). 

Remarks.  This  species  is  relatively  common  throughout  eastern  Canada  and 
the  eastern  half  of  North  America  to  as  far  west  as  Oklahoma,  although  it  has  yet 
to  be  reported  from  any  states  north  or  south  of  Oklahoma. 


126  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Procloeon  rufostrigatum  McDunnough 

Centroptilum  rufostrigatum  McDunnough,  1924:95 
Centroptilum  bistrigatum  Daggy,  1945:389 
Centroptilum  hobbsi,  Bemer,  1946:77,  NEW  SYNONYM 
Procloeon  hobbsi  (Berner),  NEW  SYNONYM 

Material  examined.  Centroptilum  hobbsi,  PARATYPE:  female  adult,  Florida,  Alachua  Co, 
Sante  Fe  R  at  Poe  Springs  (FAMU).  Procloeon  sp.  1,  female  adults,  Texas:  Blanco  Co,  Blanco  R 
(PERC). 

Records.  MISSOURI:  Adair  Co.,  Chariton  R  at  Hwy  6  bridge,  IX-20-2001,  RJ  Sarver  (larvae, 
RS);  Osage  Co,  Maries  R,  VIII-21-1996,  RJ  Sarver  (larvae,  MDNR).  VERMONT:  Windhams  Co, 
Whetstone  Brk  at  Battleboro,  VI- 19,20- 1976,  WP  McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  M  Minno  (larvae, 
PERC). 

Remarks.  Berner  ( 1 946)  based  his  description  of  C.  hobbsi  on  a  small  num- 
ber of  adult  females  from  northern  Florida,  and  he  included  a  description  of  pre- 
sumably associated  larvae.  The  latter  are  indistinguishable  from  the  larvae  of  P. 
rufostrigatum.  Adult  paratype  material  of  P.  hobbsi  also  proved  to  be  equivalent 
to  P.  rufostrigatum.  The  report  of  P.  rivulare  from  central  Texas  by  Baumgardner 
et  al.  (1997)  is  referable  to  P.  rufostrigatum,  and  reexamination  of  material  infor- 
mally referred  to  as  Procloeon  sp.  1  from  Texas  by  McCafferty  and  Davis  (1992) 
showed  that  it  also  is  referable  to  P.  rufrostrigatum.  This  species  is  common  in 
the  central  plains  states  and  Manitoba,  but  is  also  known  from  more  eastern  Can- 
ada and  the  USA. 


Procloeon  simplex  McDunnough 

Cloeon  simplex  McDunnough,  1925:185 

Records.  MISSOURI:  Maries  Co.,  Gasconade  R  nr  Hwy  63  bridge,  V-03-1989,  S  Humphrey 
(larvae,  PERC,  MDNR). 

Remarks.  This  species  is  known  from  scattered  localities  in  the  eastern  half 
of  North  America. 


Procloeon  viridoculare  Berner 

Centroptilum  viridocularis  Berner,  1940:39 

Procloeon  imibniin  Lowen  and  Flannagan,  1992:104,  NEW  SYNONYM 

Records.  ARKANSAS:  Scott  Co,  Mill  Cr  at  Mill  Cr  picnic  area,  Ouachita  Nat  For,  VI-1-1974, 
WP  McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  L  Dersch  (larva,  PERC).  KENTUCKY:  Christian  Co.,  Buck  Fork 
Pond  R,  VIII-14-1980,  and  Knott  Co,  Carr  Fork,  VI-27-1978,  WP  McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha  (lar- 
vae, PERC).  INDIANA:  Benton  Co.,  Big  Pine  Creek,  V-25-1976,  and  trib  of  Big  Pine  Cr,  ca  5  mi  NE 
Templeton,  VIII-04-1976,  AV  Provonsha,  M  Minno,  and  Elkhart  Co,  Elkhart  R,  IX-5-1978,  WP 
McCafferty,  AV  Provonsha,  and  Hendricks  Co,  W  frk  White  Lick  Cr,  VI1-20-1978,  M  Minno,  JH 
Hollis,  and  Jasper  Co.,  Oliver  Ditch  (Iroquois  R),  VII-26-1973,  K  Black,  and  Jefferson  Co,  Indian- 
Kentuck  Cr,  VI- 17- 1977,  AV  Provonsha,  M  Minno,  AA  Alabi,  and  LaGrange  Co.,  Pigeon  Cr  IX-7- 
1974,  AV  Provonsha,  and  Martin  Co.,  West  Fork  White  River  at  Hindostan  Falls  Publ  Fish  Site.  VII- 
26-1982,  and  Bogg's  Cr,  IX-8-1978,  AV  Provonsha,  M  Doub,  and  Tippecanoe  Co.,  Wabash  R,  VI- 
14-1977,  M  Minno,  D  Morihara,  S  Yocom,  and  Warren  Co.,  Kickapoo  Cr,  V-2 1-1976,  M  Minno,  D 
Morihara  (larvae,  PERC).  OKLAHOMA:  Noble  Co,  no  other  data  (larva,  PERC). 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 127 

Remarks.  We  found  that  P.  irmbrum  was  indistinguishable  from  P.  viridoc- 
ulare.  This  species  is  common  in  central  states  such  as  Iowa  and  Texas,  and 
southeastern  states  such  as  Florida  and  Alabama.  It  is  also  known  from  a  few 
additional  midwestern  and  eastern  states  as  well  as  Ontario. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  the  following  individuals  for  loans,  donations,  or  other  assistance:  B.  Colburn  (Lincoln, 
MA),  G.  Edmunds  (Salt  Lake  City,  UT),  R.  Hoebeke  (Ithaca,  NY),  B.  Kondratieff(Fort  Collins,  CO), 
D.  Lenat  (Raleigh,  NC),  S.  Long  (Gainesville,  FL),  and  J.  Peters  (Tallahassee,  FL),  R.  Randolph  and 
L.  Sun  (West  Lafayette,  IN),  R.  Sarver  (Jefferson  City,  MO),  and  R.  Waltz  (Indianapolis,  IN).  Col- 
lections and  documentation  of  materials  held  at  PERC  have  been  supported  in  part  by  NSF  grant 
DEB-9901577to  WPM. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Baumgardner,  D.  E.,  J.  H.  Kennedy,  and  B.  C.  Henry,  Jr.  1997.  New  and  additional  records  of 
Texas  mayflies  (Insecta:  Ephemeroptera).  Transactions  American  Entomological  Society  123: 
55-69. 

Berner,  L.   1940.  Baetine  mayflies  from  Florida  (Ephemeroptera).  Florida  Entomologist.  23:  33-45. 

Berner,  L.   1946.  New  species  of  Florida  mayflies  (Ephemeroptera).  Florida  Entomologist.  28:  60- 

82. 

Burian,  S.  K.  and  K.  E.  Gibbs.  1991.  Mayflies  of  Maine:  an  annotated  faunal  list.  Maine  Agri- 
cultural Experimental  Station  Tech  Bulletin.  142:  109  pp. 

Daggy,  R.  H.  1945.  New  species  and  previously  undescribed  naiads  of  some  Minnesota  mayflies 
(Ephemeroptera).  Annuals  Entomological  Society  America  38:  373-396. 

Eaton,  A.  E.  1870.  On  some  British  species  of  Ephemeridae.  Transactions  Entomological  Society 
London  18:  1-8. 

Eaton,  A.  E.  1883-88.  A  revisional  monograph  of  recent  Ephemeridae  or  mayflies.  Transactions 
Linnaean  Society  London.  2nd  Series.  3:  1-352. 

Edmunds,  G.  F.,  Jr.  1954.  New  species  of  Utah  mayflies.  II.  Baetidae,  Centroptilum  (Ephemerop- 
tera). Proceedings  Entomological  Society  Washington  56:  1-4. 

Ide,  F.  P.  1930.  Contribution  to  the  biology  of  Ontario  mayflies  with  descriptions  of  new  species. 
The  Canadian  Entomologist  62:  218-231. 

Jacobus,  L.  M.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  2001.  New  Ephemeroptera  records  from  Pennsylvania. 
Entomological  News  112:  144. 

Leonard,  J.  \V.  and  F.  A.  Leonard.  1962.  Mayflies  of  Michigan  trout  streams.  Carnbrook  Inst.. 
Bloomfield  Hills,  Michigan.  88  pp. 

Lowen,  R.  G.  and  J.  F.  Flannagan.  1990.  Centroptilum  infreguens  McDunnough  (Ephemeroptera: 
Baetidae)  a  junior  synonym  of  Pseudocentroptilum  penmilatum  (Eaton).  The  Canadian  Ento- 
mologist 124:  97-108. 

Lowen,  R.  G.  and  J.  F.  Flannagan.  1992.  Nymphs  and  imagoes  of  four  North  American  species  of 
Procloeon  Bengtsson  with  description  of  a  new  species  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae).  The  Cana- 
dian Entomologist  124:  97-108. 

McCafferty,  \V.  P.  1993.  Commentary  on  Dnmella  titberculata  and  Procloeon  penmilatum  (Ephe- 
meroptera: Ephemerellidae;  Baetidae)  in  North  Carolina.  Entomological  News  104:  235-239. 


128  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


McCafferty,  W.  P.  and  J.  R.  Davis.  1992.  New  and  additional  records  of  small  minnow  mayflies 
(Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae)  from  Texas.  Entomological  News  103:  199-209. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  and  R.  P.  Randolph.  1998.  Canada  mayflies:  a  faunistic  compendium.  Proceed- 
ings Entomological  Society  Ontario  129:  47-97. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.,  R.  S.  Durfee,  and  B.  C.  Kondratieff.  1993.  Colorado  mayflies  (Ephe- 
meroptera): an  annotated  inventory.  Southwestern  Naturalist  38:  252-274. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.,  T.  Hubbard,  T.  H.  Klubertanz,  R.  P.  Randolph,  and  M.  Birmingham.  2003. 
Mayflies  (Ephemeroptera)  of  the  Great  Plains.  II.  Iowa.  Transactions  American  Entomological 
Society  129:  77-105. 

McDunnough,  J.  1923.  New  Canadian  Ephemeridae  with  notes.  The  Canadian  Entomologist  55: 
39-50. 

McDunnough,  J.  1924.  New  Canadian  Ephemeridae.  The  Canadian  Entomologist  56:  90-98,  113- 
122,  128-133. 

McDunnough,  J.  1925.  New  Canadian  Ephemeridae  with  notes,  III.  The  Canadian  Entomologist 
168-176,  185-192. 

McDunnough,  J.  1 926.  Notes  on  North  American  Ephemeroptera  with  descriptions  of  new  species. 
The  Canadian  Entomologist  58:  184-196. 

McDunnough,  J.  1929.  Notes  on  North  American  Ephemeroptera  with  descriptions  of  new  species 
II.  The  Canadian  Entomologist  61:  169-180. 

McDunnough,  J.  1938.  New  species  of  North  American  Ephemeroptera  with  critical  notes.  The 
Canadian  Entomologist  70:  23-35. 

Randolph,  R.  P.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1998.  Diversity  and  distribution  of  mayflies 
(Ephemeroptera)  of  Illinois,  Indiana,  Kentucky,  Michigan,  Ohio,  and  Wisconsin.  Ohio  Biological 
Survey  Bulletin,  New  Ser.  13:  vii  +  188pp. 

Randolph,  R.  P.,  W.  P.  McCafferty,  D.  Zaranko,  L.  M.  Jacobus,  and  J.  M.  Webb.  2002.  New 
Canadian  records  of  Baetidae  (Ephemeroptera)  and  adjustments  to  North  American  Cloeon.  En- 
tomological News  113:  306-309. 

Seemann,  T.  M.  1927.  Ephemerida.  Journal  Entomological  Zoology  Pomona  College  (Pomona, 
California,  U.S.A.)  19:40-51. 

Traver,  J.  R.  1932.  Mayflies  of  North  Carolina,  Part  II.  Journal  Elisha  Mitchell  Science  Society  48: 
141-206. 

Traver,  J.  R.  1935.  Part  II,  Systematic,  pp.  237-739.  In:  J.G.  Needham,  J.R.  Traver  and  Y.-C.  Hsu 
(Editors).  The  biology  of  mayflies.  Comstock,  Ithaca,  New  York. 

Walsh,  B.  D.  1862.  List  of  the  Pseudoneuroptera  of  Illinois,  contained  in  the  cabinet  of  the  writer, 
with  descriptions  of  over  forty  new  species,  and  notes  on  their  structural  affinities.  Proceedings 
Academy  Natural  Science  Philadelphia  13-14:  361-402. 

Wiersema,  N.  A.  1999.  Two  new  species  of  Pmcloeon  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae)  from  Texas.  En- 
tomological News  110:  27-35. 

Wiersema,  N.A.  and  S.  K.  Burian.  2000.  Centroptilum  ozarkensum  (Ephmeroptera:  Baetidae)  a 
new  long-clawed  baetid  from  Missouri.  Journal  Kansas  Entomological  Society  72:  177-180. 


Vol.  115,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004  129 


.. 


SUPERMALE"  CADDISFLIES  (TRICHOPTERA: 
HYDROPSYCHIDAE,  PHILOPOTAMIDAE)  FROM 
THE  NORTH  CENTRAL  UNITED  STATES' 

David  C.  Houghton' 

ABSTRACT:  Specimens  of  Chimarra  soda  and  Cheumatopsyche  campyla  from  Minnesota  and 
Ohio,  respectively,  are  reported  with  the  unusual  condition  of  possessing  two  sets  of  male  genitalia. 
These  specimens,  the  first  report  of  "supermale"  caddisflies  from  the  United  States  are  described  and 
illustrated  herein.  The  cause  of  the  supermale  condition  remains  unclear. 

KEY  WORDS:  Trichoptera,  Hydropsychidae,  Philopotamidae,  north  central  U.S.A.,  "supermale" 

The  term  "ubermannchen"  or,  in  English,  "supermale"  or  "metamale"  des- 
cribes sterile  males  with  an  extra  male  sex  chromosome  and  often  with  exagger- 
ated primary  sexual  characteristics  (Klima  and  Mey  1987,  Redei  1998).  Such 
specimens  are  quite  rare  in  nature  and  it  is  not  clear  what  causes  the  condition 
(Redei  1998).  The  only  known  description  of  a  possible  supermale  caddisfly  was 
by  Klima  and  Mey  (1987),  who  discovered  a  specimen  of  the  German  caddisfly 
Chaeopterygopsis  machlachlani  Stein  (Limnephilidae)  with  two  phalli  lying  par- 
allel to  each  other  in  the  genital  capsule  and  separated  by  a  single  intermediate 
appendage.  The  remainder  of  the  genitalic  structures  of  this  specimen  appeared 
to  be  normal.  They  hypothesized  that  this  specimen  was  a  supermale,  although 
they  did  not  provide  any  genetic  information  on  it. 

Other  genitalic  anomalies,  such  as  intersexual  and  gynandromorphic  individ- 
uals, have  been  reported  in  14  caddisfly  species  within  five  families,  mostly  in 
the  European  literature  (Nielsen  1948,  Schmid  1956,  Schmid  1958,  McLachlan 
1968,  Swegman  1978,  Dia  and  Botosaneanu  1982,  Mey  1982,  Klima  and  Mey 
1987,  Botosaneanu  1995).  Klima  and  Mey  (1987)  provided  a  review  of  all  such 
anomalous  individuals  prior  to  1987. 

This  paper  describes  the  apparent  supermale  condition  in  two  caddisflies:  a 
Minnesota  specimen  of  Chimarra  soda  Hagen  (Philopotamidae),  and  an  Ohio 
specimen  of  Cheumatopsyche  campyla  Ross  (Hydropsychidae).  Both  species  are 
common  throughout  the  eastern  United  States  (Lago  and  Harris  1987,  Nimmo 
1987,  Armitage  1991).  In  Minnesota,  C.  soda  is  common  in  the  northeastern 
third  of  the  state  where  it  has  been  found  in  a  variety  of  stream  types  (Houghton 
2004).  Cheumatopsyche  campyla  is  abundant  throughout  Ohio  and,  likewise, 
found  in  a  variety  of  habitats  (B.  J.  Armitage,  Ohio  Biological  Survey,  personal 
communication).  Examined  material  is  deposited  in  either  the  University  of 
Minnesota  Insect  Collection,  Saint  Paul,  Minnesota  (UMSP)  or  the  University  of 
Tennessee  Trichoptera  Collection  (UT). 


1  Received  on  June  18,  2003.  Accepted  on  January  12,  2004. 

'Department  of  Entomology,  219  Hodson  Hall,  1980  Folwell  Ave.,  University  of  Minnesota,  Saint 
Paul,  MN  55108.  Current  address:  School  of  Sciences,  1501  Lakeside  Drive,  Lynchburg  College, 
Lynchburg,  VA  24501,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  Houghtonfalynchburg.edu. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


130  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Cheumatopsyche  campyla,  supermale 

Description:  Size,  color,  and  general  appearance  typical  of  species;  forewing  length  9  mm;  all  10 
abdominal  segments  including  genitalia  present.  Genitalia  (Figure  1):  Segment  IX  annular,  broad 
ventrally  with  knob-like  dorsal  apex  bearing  long  stout  setae.  Segment  X  slightly  longer  than  deep  in 
lateral  view,  extending  shelf-like  over  inferior  appendages;  with  median  lobe  bearing  setae  and  with 
setaceous  apical  lobes  knob-like  in  lateral  view  and  tapering  dorsally  to  rounded  points  in  caudal 
view.  With  two  sets  of  inferior  appendages.  One  set  appearing  normal,  each  appendage  with  basal 
segment  elongate  in  lateral  view,  bearing  fine  setae  basally  and  stout  setae  apically;  apical  segment 
broader  basally,  tapering  to  sinuate  apex.  Second  set  of  inferior  appendages  attached  inward  of  nor- 
mal set  and  asymmetrical  in  placement;  right  abnormal  appendage  rotated  approximately  165°  out- 
wardly, left  abnormal  appendage  rotated  approximately  120°  outwardly,  both  abnormal  appendages 
offset  approximately  10°  clockwise,  abnormal  appendages  otherwise  similar  to  normal  appendages. 
With  two  phalli,  each  rotated  approximately  90°  outwardly,  parallel  to  each  other  and  with  their  dor- 
sal (now  lateral)  surfaces  attached  medially;  phallic  complex  offset  approximately  15°  clockwise  in 
genital  capsule;  both  phalli  typical  in  appearance  with  slightly  enlarged  ovate  apices  and  complete 
phallobases;  neither  phallus  appearing  attached  to  ejaculatory  duct. 

Material  Examined:  OHIO:  Montgomery  Co.,  Wright-Patterson  Air  Force  Base,  2.5  km  wsw  of 
Fairborn,  27.vii.1999,  u.v.  light,  1  supermale  rf  (UT);  MINNESOTA:  Koochiching  Co.,  Rainy  R., 
confl.  Little  Fork  R.,  S.H.  11,  12.vii.1999,  D.C.  Houghton,  u.v.  light,  3  normal  cfcf ;  Anoka  Co.,  Coon 
Cr.,  Coon  Rapids  Regional  Park,  14.vii,  2000,  D.C.  Houghton,  u.v.  light,  7  normal  Cfcf;  Crow  Wing 
Co.,  Pine  R.,  S.R.  169,  20.vii.2000,  D.C.  Houghton,  u.v.  light,  23  normal  Cfcf  (UMSP). 

Chimarra  soda,  supermale 

Description:  Size,  color,  and  general  appearance  typical  of  species;  forewing  length  6  mm;  all 
10  abdominal  segments  including  genitalia  present.  Genitalia  (Figure  2):  Segment  IX  annular,  with 
elongate  spatulate  mesal  lobe  on  venter  of  sternum.  Tergum  X  membranous,  extended  shelf-like  cau- 
dally.  Intermediate  appendages  sclerotized;  curved  and  spatulate  in  dorsal  view,  each  with  two  stout 
setae  at  apex.  Preanal  appendages  lobe-like  and  setose,  attached  to  intermediate  appendages  basally. 
With  two  sets  of  inferior  appendages.  One  set  appearing  normal;  each  appendage  with  quadrate  mesal 
lobe  on  inner  surface  near  base  bearing  few  setae;  in  lateral  view  base  setose,  projecting  ventrad; 
remainder  of  appendage  elongate  with  scattered  setae;  apical  region  broad,  bearing  setae.  Second  set 
of  inferior  appendages  slightly  thinner  than  and  protruding  caudad  of  normal  set;  attached  inward  of 
normal  set  and  rotated  approximately  45°  inwardly;  otherwise  similar  to  normal  set  with  similar  setal 
arrangement.  With  two  phalli,  in  dorsal  view  oriented  parallel  to  each  other  in  approximately  the 
usual  position  within  the  genital  capsule.  Right  phallus  attached  to  ejaculatory  duct  and  appearing 
normal,  sclerotized  laterally  for  majority  of  length  with  trilobed  membranous  apical  portion;  con- 
taining two  pairs  of  internal  sclerotized  rods;  outer  pair  slender,  elongate,  tips  protruding  apically 
from  membranous  region  of  phallus;  inner  pair  sinuate,  less  heavily  sclerotized.  Left  phallus  without 
ejaculatory  duct  or  complete  phallobase;  similar  in  appearance  to  right  phallus  with  membranous  api- 
cal lobes  of  phallus  more  distinct  and  with  sinuate  inner  sclerotized  rods  protruding  apically  from 
phallic  membrane. 

Material  Examined:  MINNESOTA:  Koochiching  Co.,  Rainy  R.,  confl.  Little  Fork  R.,  S.H.  11, 
N  48°  31.174',  W  93°  34.174',  244  m,  12.vii.1999,  D.C.  Houghton,  u.v.  light,  1  supermale  cf 
(UMSP);  same,  13  normal  Cftf;  Lake  Co.,  Baptism  R.,  S.R.  1,  Eckbeck  Cpgrd,  30.vii.1991,  R.J. 
Blahnik,  u.v.  light,  5  normal  Cfcf  (UMSP). 


Vol.  115,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 


131 


B 


Figure  1.  Cheumatopsyche  campyla,  supcrmalc,  male  genitalia.  A:  Segments  IX,  X, 
inferior  appendages,  lateral.  B:  Segments  IX,  X,  dorsal.  C:  Segments  IX,  X,  Phalluses, 
dorsal.  D:  Tergum  X,  caudal. 


132 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figure  2.  Chimarra  soda,  supermale,  male  genitalia.  A:  Segments  VIII,  IX,  X,  inferior 
appendages,  lateral.  B:  Segments  IX,  X,  dorsal.  C:  Segments  IX,  X,  Phalluses,  dorsal. 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 133 

DISCUSSION 

Except  for  the  obvious  anomalies,  the  general  appearance  and  genitalia  of 
these  supermale  specimens  are  similar  to  past  descriptions  of  C.  soda  (e.g., 
Hagen  1861,  Banks  1911,  Ross  1944,  Lago  and  Harris  1987)  and  C.  campyla 
(e.g.,  Ross  1938,  Nimmo  1987,  Moulton  and  Stewart  1996),  respectively.  Like- 
wise, they  appear  similar  to  other  males  examined  from  various  locations  in  Min- 
nesota. The  chromosomal  condition  of  both  specimens  is  unknown. 

The  cause  of  genitalic  anomaly  remains  a  matter  of  conjecture.  Under  exper- 
imental conditions  using  x-rays,  Patterson  (1931)  induced  only  a  0.03  percent 
occurrence  of  gynandromorphs  in  a  colony  of  Drosophila  melanogaster.  Klima 
and  Mey's  (1987)  supermale  of  Chaeopterygopsis  machlachlani  was  collected 
along  with  an  intersex  specimen  and  173  normal  individuals.  The  authors  spec- 
ulated that  this  high  prevalence  of  genitalic  anomaly  occurred  due  to  chromoso- 
mal interaction  caused  by  inbreeding  in  the  species'  isolated  spring  habitat  rather 
than  from  mutation.  Due  to  the  widespread  distribution  of  C.  campyla  and  C. 
soda  (Lago  and  Harris  1987,  Nimmo  1987,  Armitage  1991,  Houghton  2004),  it 
seems  unlikely  that  inbreeding  could  be  the  cause  of  their  supermale  condition. 

Although  anthropogenic  pollution  has  been  shown  to  cause  morphological 
aberrations  in  both  vertebrates  and  invertebrates  (Dickman  et  al.  1992,  Maden  et 
al.  1993,  Fort  et  al.  1999,  Gardiner  and  Hoppe  1999),  more  information  about  the 
collecting  localities  must  be  obtained  before  such  a  hypothesis  could  be  made 
about  the  supermale  specimens  described  here.  The  C.  soda  specimen  was  col- 
lected from  the  confluence  of  two  large  (>100  m  wide)  rivers,  the  Rainy  and  the 
Little  Fork,  shortly  after  dusk.  This  site  is  located  on  the  Canadian  border  and 
approximately  20  km  downstream  of  International  Falls,  a  town  of  6,700  (IFCC 
2000).  This  same  collection  contained  47  species  of  caddisflies  and  13  male 
specimens  of  C.  soda  without  genitalic  anomaly.  The  C.  campyla  specimen  was 
collected  from  Wright-Patterson  Air  Force  Base  in  southwestern  Ohio.  The  same 
collection  yielded  23  species  of  caddisflies  and  123  male  specimens  of  C  campy- 
la  without  abnormality.  It  will  be  difficult  to  determine  the  cause  of  the  super- 
male  condition  with  such  a  small  number  of  known  specimens. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

My  sincere  thanks  go  to  D.A.  Etnier  and  J.T.  Baxter,  University  of  Tennessee,  for  loan  of  their 
supermale  ('.  campvla  specimen  and  for  supplying  data  about  its  collection  site.  I  thank  also  U.G. 
Munderloh  for  translating  some  German  literature  into  English,  and  R.J.  Blahnik,  R.W.  Holzenthal. 
and  two  anonymous  reviewers  for  reviewing  earlier  versions  of  this  manuscript.  The  Minnesota  spec- 
imen was  collected  during  work  supported  by  a  Science  to  Achieve  Results  Fellowship  from  the 
United  States  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  and  grants  from  the  Minnesota  Department  of 
Natural  Resources,  Nongame  Wildlife  Fund,  and  the  Dayton  Fund  for  Natural  History,  James  Ford 
Bell  Museum,  University  of  Minnesota. 


134  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Armitage,  B.  J.  1991.  Diagnostic  atlas  of  the  North  American  caddisfly  adults,  I.  Philopotamidae,  2nd 
Edition,  The  Caddis  Press.  Athens,  Alabama.  72  pp. 

Banks,  N.  1911.  Descriptions  of  new  species  of  North  American  neuropteroid  insects.  Transactions  of  the 
American  Entomological  Society  37:335-360. 

Botosaneanu,  L.  1995.  A  gynandromorph  specimen  of  Psvchomvia  ctenophora  McLachlan  1884,  from 
Spain  (Trichoptera:  Psychomyiidae).  Entomologische  Berichten  53:131-136. 

Dia,  A.  and  L.  Botosaneaneau.  1982.  Un  cas  de  gynadromorphismus  chez  un  trichoptere  hydroptilidae 
du  Liban  (Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae).  Entomologische  Berichten  42:140-141. 

Dickman,  M.  L.  Brindle  and  M.  Benson.  1992.  Evidence  of  teratogens  in  sediments  of  the  Niagara 
River  watershed  as  reflected  by  chironoinid  (Diptera:  Chironomidae)  deformities.  Journal  of  Great 
Lakes  Research  18:467-480. 

Fort,  D.  J.,  T.  L.  Propst,  E.  L.  Stover,  J.  C.  Helgen,  R.  Levy,  K.  Gallagher,  and  J.  G.  Burkhart.  1999. 
Effects  of  pond  water,  sediment  and  sediment  extracts  from  Minnesota  and  Vermont  on  early  develop- 
ment and  metamorphosis  in  Xenopus.  Environmental  Toxicity  and  Chemistry  18:2305-2315. 

Gardiner,  D.  M.  and  D.  M.  Hoppe.  1999.  Environmentally  induced  limb  malformations  in  mink  frogs 
(Rana  septentrionalis).  Journal  of  Experimental  Zoology  284:  207-216. 

Hagen,  H.  A.  1861.  Synopsis  of  the  Neuroptera  of  North  America  with  a  list  of  the  South  American 
species.  Smithsonian  Institution  Miscellaneous  Collection  347  pp. 

Houghton,  D.  C.  2004.  Minnesota  caddisfly  biodiversity  (Insecta:  Trichoptera):  delineation  and  charac- 
terization of  regions.  Environmental  Monitoring  and  Assessment  95:  153-182. 

IFCC  (International  Falls  Chamber  of  Commerce).  2000.  http://www.intlfalls.org/facts.htm. 

Klima,  F.  and  W.  Mey.  1987.  Anomalien  in  der  Geschlechtsrealisierung  bei  Kocherflegen  (Trichoptera). 
Deutsche  Entomologische  Zeitschrift  34:161-168. 

Lago,  P.  K.  and  S.  C.  Harris.  1987.  The  Chimarra  (Trichoptera:  Philopotamidae)  of  eastern  North 
America  with  the  descriptions  of  three  new  species.  Journal  of  the  New  York  Entomological  Society 
95:225-251. 

Madden,  C.  P.,  P.  J.  Suter,  B.  C.  Nicholson,  and  A.  D.  Austin.  1993.  Deformities  in  chironomid  larvae 
as  indicators  of  pollution  (pesticide)  stress.  Netherlands  Journal  of  Aquatic  Ecology.  26:551-557. 

Mey,  W.  1 982.  Eine  bilaterale  gynandromorphe  von  Anabolia  furcata  Brauer  (Insecta:  Trichoptera).  Zoo- 
logischer  Anzeiger  209:394-396. 

Moulton,  S.  R.  II  and  K.  W.  Stewart.  1996.  Caddisflies  (Trichoptera)  of  the  Interior  Highlands  of  North 
America.  Memoirs  of  the  American  Entomological  Institute  56:1-313. 

Nielsen,  A.  1948.  Trichoptera,  caddisflies,  with  description  of  a  new  species  of  Hydroptila,  pp.  123—144. 
//;,  Berg,  K.  (Editor),  Biological  studies  on  the  river  Susaa.  Folia  Limnologica  Scandanavica.  225  pp. 

Nimmo,  A.  P.  1987.  The  adult  Arctopsychidae  and  Hydropsychidae  of  Canada  and  adjacent  United 
States.  Quaestiones  Entomologica  23:1-189. 

Patterson,  J  .  T.  1 93 1 .  The  production  of  gynandromorphs  in  Drosophila  melanogaster  by  x-ray.  Journal 
of  Experimental  Zoology  60: 1 73-2 1 1 . 

Redei,  G.  P.  1998.  Genetics  manual:  current  theory,  concepts,  terms.  World  Scientific,  River  Edge,  New 
Jersey.  1320  pp. 

Ross,  H.  H.  1938.  Descriptions  of  Nearctic  caddis  flies  (Trichoptera)  with  special  reference  to  the  Illinois 
species.  Bulletin  of  the  Illinois  Natural  History  Survey  21:101-183. 

Ross,  H.  H.  1944.  The  caddis  flies,  or  Trichoptera,  of  Illinois.  Bulletin  of  the  Illinois  Natural  History 
Survey  23:1-326. 

Schmid,  F.  1956.  La  sous-famile  des  Drusinae  (Trichoptera:  Limnephilidae).  Mcmoires  Insitut  Royal  des 
Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique  55: 1-92. 

Schmid,  F.   1958  Trichopteres  du  Ceylon.  Archives  fur  Hydrobiologia  54:1-173. 

Swegman,  B.  1978.  The  occurrence  of  an  intersex  individual  of  Psychomyiaflavida  Hagen  (Trichoptera). 
Entomological  News  89: 1 87-188. 


Vol.  115,  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 135 

TWO  NEW  SPECIES  OF  ETHMIA  HUBNER  FROM  CHINA 
(LEPIDOPTERA:  ELACHISTIDAE:  ETHMIINAE)1 

Shu-Xia  Wang2  and  Hou-Hun  Li2 

ABSTRACT:  Two  new  species  Ethmia  antennipilosa  and  E.  cribravia  from  Guangxi  and  Yunnan 
provinces  of  China  are  described.  Photographs  of  the  adults  and  genital  structures  are  provided. 

KEY  WORDS:   Lepidoptera,  Elachistidae,  Ethmiinae,  Ethmia,  new  species,  China 

Ethmia  is  the  largest  genus  in  Ethmiinae,  with  more  than  90  species  described 
in  the  Palaearctic  Region.  The  genus  is  represented  in  China  by  46  species  report- 
ed previously  (Sattler,  1967;  Amsel,  1969;  Liu,  1980;  Liu  and  Xu,  1982;  Wang 
and  Zheng,  1997;  Kun  and  Szaboky,  2000;  Kun,  2001;  Kun,  2002a;  Kun,  2002b). 
The  purpose  of  this  paper  is  to  describe  two  new  species  of  Ethmia  from  China. 

Ethmia  antennipilosa  Wang  and  Li,  sp.  nov. 

(Figs.  1,3,5) 

Diagnosis:  This  new  species  is  similar  to  Ethmia  epitrocha  (Meyrick)  in  pat- 
tern and  male  genitalia  (Meyrick,  1914;  Sattler,  1967),  but  can  be  separated  from 
the  latter  by  having  an  antenna  with  basal  half  of  flagellum  widely  expanded;  a 
bifurcate  uncus  from  about  middle;  anterior  part  of  gnathos  with  anterior  margin 
rounded;  a  ventral  margin  of  sacculus  gently  arched. 

Type  Data:  Holotype  Cf:  China,  Hengxian  (22.6°  N,  109.2"  E),  Guangxi  Province.  July  18,  2002, 
coll.  Yanli  Du,  genitalia  slide  No.  W03065.  Deposited  in  the  Department  of  Biology,  Nankai  Univer- 
sity, Tianjnn,  China. 

Description  (Figs.  1,  3).  Head:  frontoclypeus  shinning  black,  medially  tinged  with  white  scales; 
vertex  white.  Antenna  (Fig.  3)  with  scape  white,  with  black  scales  along  anterior  and  posterior  mar- 
gins; flagellum  black,  basal  half  greatly  expanded,  compressed  dorsoventrally.  with  long  yellowish- 
white  scales,  forming  a  hairbrush  on  posterior  margin,  compact  rough  scales;  distal  half  gradually 
thinned  toward  apex,  ending  in  point.  Labial  palpus  black,  with  appressed  scales;  second  segment 
thick  and  long,  about  1 .5  times  as  long  as  diameter  of  compound  eye,  dotted  with  white  scales  on  dor- 
sal surface;  third  segment  thin,  shorter  than  1/2  of  second,  distal  half  white,  pointed  apically.  Thorax 
grayish  white,  with  four  black  spots:  two  spots  near  anterior  margin,  two  near  posterior  margin. 
Tegula  grayish  white,  with  one  black  spot  near  anterolateral  margin.  Forewing:  length  10.5  mm; 
ground  colour  light  gray,  somewhat  pale  brown;  costal  margin  gentle;  apex  rounded;  fourteen  irreg- 
ularly shaped  black  spots  or  blotches  scattered  on  surface:  three  larger  elongate  blotches  along  basal 
half  of  costal  margin;  cell  with  four  spots:  one  at  base,  one  at  2/3  length  and  two  other  larger  elon- 
gate spots  near  distal  end;  fold  with  three  spots:  one  at  base,  2/5  length  and  3/5  length  respectively, 
the  basal  spot  is  smallest;  tornus  with  one  spot  above;  one  small  spot  at  basal  1  4  near  posterior  mar- 
gin; two  irregular  large  spots  near  apex;  nine  small,  black  marginal  spots  from  distal  portion  of  costal 
margin  to  termen;  fringe  whitish  gray.  Hindwing  and  fringe  pale  gray.  Fore  and  mid  legs  white  above, 
black  with  white  markings  below;  hind  leg  grayish  white,  tarsus  brown  basally.  white  apically. 

Male  genitalia  (Fig.  5).  Uncus  widely  bilobed  apically,  each  lobe  short,  with  rounded  apex. 
Gnathos  spinose,  with  posterior  part  subtriangularly  shaped,  the  posterior  margin  dentate,  slightly 


'  Received  on  May  17,  2004.  Accepted  on  October  31.  2004. 

-'Department  of  Biology.  Nankai  University,  Tianjin  300071,  China.  E-mail  (SXW):  shxwangfa 
nankai.edu.cn.    E-mail  (HHL):  liliouhuiVanankai.edu.cn. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


136  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


concave  at  middle;  anterior  part  wider,  the  anterior  margin  rounded.  Labis  spinose  and  weakly  scler- 
otized,  with  a  rounded  apical  margin.  Valva  gradually  narrowed  from  base,  distal  1/3  elongate,  with 
fine  and  large  setae;  apex  blunt.  Sacculus  weakly  sclerotized,  slightly  arched  ventrally,  with  a  large 
distal  spine.  Costa  forming  a  sclerotized  plate  from  base  to  2/5  length.  Aedeagus  strongly  curved 
basally,  with  a  small  sclerotized  plate  near  apex. 
Female.  Unknown. 

Etymology.  The  specific  epithet  is  derived  from  the  Latin,  antenna,  meaning 
long  projection,  as  in  those  sticking  up  on  sails,  and  pilosa,  meaning  hairy  or 
pilose,  referring  to  the  specialized  scales  forming  a  hairbrush  on  the  dorsal  edge 
of  antenna. 


Ethmia  cribravia  Wang  and  Li,  sp.  nov. 

(Figs.  2,  4,  6) 

Diagnosis.  This  species  is  similar  to  Ethmia  dehiscens  Meyrick  (Meyrick, 
1924;  Sattler,  1967),  but  differs  from  the  latter  by  having  a  hindwing  with  long 
ochreous  brown  scales  along  the  anal  margin,  dorsally  projected  valva  at  end  and 

vesica  of  aedeagus  with  several  cornuti. 

Type  Data.  Holotype  Cf:  China,  Lijiang  (26.8°  N,  100.2"  E),  Yunnan  Province,  Apr  11,  1974, 
coll.  Yao  Zhou  and  Feng  Yuan,  genitalia  slide  No.  W03071.  Paratypes:  2  cfcf,  other  same  data  as 
holotype.  Deposited  in  the  Department  of  Biology,  Nankai  University,  Tianjnn,  China. 

Description  (Figs.  2,  4).  Head:  frontoclypeus  and  vertex  whitish  gray,  posterior  area  of  vertex 
with  a  black  spot  at  middle.  Antenna  filiform;  scape  blackish  gray  on  dorsal  surface,  grayish  white 
on  ventral  surface,  flagellum  gray.  Labial  palpus  with  first  segment  whitish  gray;  second  segment 
with  basal  2/5  black  except  for  inner  side;  third  segment  with  basal  1/3  black.  Thorax  brownish  gray, 
with  three  black  spots  triangularly  arranged.  Tegula  brownish  gray  except  for  base  whitish,  with  a 
pair  of  black  spots  at  base.  Forewing:  length  12.5  mm;  costal  margin  gently  arched;  ground  color 
brownish  gray,  overlaid  with  16  black  streaks  and  spots:  costal  margin  with  one  spot  at  base,  two 
larger  spots  beside  this  one  near  costal  margin;  cell  with  two  rounded  spots  respectively  set  at  mid- 
dle near  upper  margin  and  at  end,  the  latter  larger,  longitudinally  extending  inward;  fold  with  three 
spots  respectively  set  at  base,  middle  and  end;  eight  streaks  extending  from  basal  1/5  near  costal  mar- 
gin to  around  end  of  cell;  posterior  margin  with  one  elongate  spot  at  distal  1/3;  10-11  irregularly 
rounded  small  dots  extending  from  distal  2/5  of  costal  margin  and  along  termen  to  beyond  tornus; 
fringe  gray.  Hindwing  pale  gray,  with  piliform  ocherous  brown  scales  on  anal  margin  (Fig.  4).  Fore 
and  mid  legs  black,  tarsomeres  black  basally,  white  apically.  Hind  leg  whitish  gray,  except  tarsus 
brown.  Abdomen  brown. 

Male  genitalia  (Fig.  6).  Uncus  produced  into  two  large  lobes  near  half  length,  and  irregularly 
rounded,  caudal  margin  with  a  pair  of  short  apex-rounded  processes.  Posterior  part  of  gnathos  heart- 
like  in  shape,  spined,  with  dense  short  spines  along  posterior  margin,  which  is  bluntly  rounded;  ante- 
rior part  somewhat  trapezoidal  in  shape,  wider  than  posterior  part,  densely  with  short  strong  spines, 
straight  anteriorly.  Labis  relatively  short,  with  short  spines,  concave  inward  at  ventral  2/3,  apex 
rounded.  Valva  with  basal  2/3  broad;  distal  1/3  slightly  narrowed,  apex  rounded  and  margined  with 
strong  setae,  dorsally  forming  a  projection  at  end  pointing  upward,  ventrally  with  a  short  spine  near 
apex.  Costa  straight,  sclerotized.  Sacculus  weakly  sclerotized,  with  ventral  margin  straight  in  basal 
half,  forming  an  obtuse  angle  at  about  middle.  Aedeagus  relatively  thick,  bent  at  basal  1/3;  cornuti 
consisting  of  several  spines. 

Female.  Unknown. 

Etymology.  This  specific  epithet  is  derived  from  the  Latin,  cribravius,  mean- 
ing tufty,  and  it  refers  to  the  long  setae  along  the  anal  margin  of  the  hindwing. 


Vol.  1 1 5,  No.  3,  Mav  &  June  2004 


137 


> 


Figs.  1-6.  Ethmia  spp.  1.  Adult  Ethmia  antennipilosa  sp.  nov.  (male).  2.  Adult  Ethmia 
cribravia  sp.  nov.  (male).  3.  Antenna  of  Ethmia  antennipilosa  sp.  nov.  showing  special- 
ized scales.  4.  Part  of  hindwing  of  Ethmia  crihravia  sp.  nov.  showing  specialized  setae  of 
anal  area.  5.  Male  genitalia  of  Ethmia  antennipilosa  sp.  nov.  6.  Male  genitalia  of  Ethmia 
cribravia  sp.  nov. 


138  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  are  grateful  to  K.  Saltier,  Department  of  Entomology,  the  Natural  History  Museum,  London, 
UK,  for  his  kind  suggestion  and  J.  A.  Powell,  Department  of  Entomological  Sciences,  University  of 
California,  Berkeley,  U.S.A.  for  his  valuable  comments  on  Ethmia  antennipilosa  sp.  nov.  and  litera- 
ture; A.  Kun,  Department  of  Zoology,  Hungarian  Natural  History  Museum,  Hungary,  for  sending  us 
his  papers  on  Ethmia:  and  Yalin  Zhang,  Entomological  Museum,  Northwest  Sci-Tech  University  of 
Agriculture  and  Forestry,  China,  for  providing  us  with  specimens  collected  from  Yunnan  Province. 
This  project  is  supported  by  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (No.  3047021 1 ). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Amsel,  H.  G.  1969.  Eine  neue  chinesische  Ethmia-Art  (Lepidoptera:  Ethmiidae).  Beitrage  zur 
Naturkundlichen  Forschung  in  Siidwestdeutschland  28:  75-76. 

Kun,  A.  2001.  New  Ethmiinae  (Lepidoptera:  Oecophoridae)  species  from  Southeast  Asia.  Annales 
Historico  Naturales  Musei  Nationalis  Hungarici  93:  207-217. 

Kun,  A.  2002a.  New  Ethmiinae  (Lepidoptera:  Elachistidae)  species  from  Southeast  Asia  II.  Annales 
Historico  Naturales  Musei  Nationalis  Hungarici  94:  169-179. 

Kun,  A.  2002b.  Taxonomic  notes  on  the  Korean  Ethmia  (Lepidoptera:  Oecophoridae;  Ethmiinae). 
Insecta  Koreana  19(2):  131-136. 

Kun,  A.  and  C.  Szaboky.  2000.  Survey  of  the  Taiwanese  Ethmiinae  (Lepidoptera,  Oecophoridae) 
with  descriptions  of  three  new  species.  Acta  Zoologica  Academiae  Scientiarum  Hungaricae 
46(1):  53-78. 

Liu,  Y.  1980.  A  study  of  Chinese  Ethmia  Hiibner  (Lepidoptera:  Ethmiidae)  in  classification,  distri- 
bution and  numerical  taxonomy.  Entomotaxonomia  2(4):  267-284. 

Liu,  Y.  and  K.  Xu.  1982.  Numerical  taxonomic  method  applied  to  Palaearctic  ethmiids  (Lepidop- 
tera: Ethmiidae).  Entomotaxonomia  4(4):  239-251. 

Meyrick,  E.  1914.  [H.  Sauter's  Formosa- Ausbeute]  Pterophoridae,  Tortricidae,  Eucosmidae,  Gele- 
chiidae,  Oecophoridae,  Cosmopterygidae,  Hyponomeutidae,  Heliodinidae,  Sesiadae,  Glyphip- 
terygidae,  Plutelidae,  Tineidae,  Adelidae  (Lep.).  Supplementa  Entomologica  3:  45-62. 

Meyrick,  E.   1924.  Exotic  Microlepidoptera  3:  97-128. 

Powell,  J.  A.  1985.  Taxonomy  and  geographical  relationships  of  Australian  ethmiid  moths  (Lepi- 
doptera: Gelechioidea).  Australian  Journal  of  Zoology  Supplementary  Series  No.  1 12:  1-58. 

Sattler,  K.  1967.  Ethmiidae.  -  Microlepidoptera  Palaearctica.  Volume  2.  Verlag  Georg  Fromme  & 
Co.,  Wien,  Austria  185  pp.,  106  pis. 

Wang,  S.  and  Z.  Zheng.  1997.  Two  new  species  and  two  new  records  of  the  genus  Ethmia  Hiibner 
(Lepidoptera:  Oecophoridae)  from  China.  Entomotaxonomia  19(2):  135-138. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 139 

A  NEW  SMALL  MINNOW  MAYFLY 
(EPHEMEROPTERA:  BAETIDAE)  FROM  UTAH,  U.S.A.1 

N.  A.  Wiersema,1  C.  R.  Nelson,'  and  K.  F.  Kuehnl4 

ABSTRACT:  Baetis  moqui,  n.  sp.,  is  described  from  larvae  collected  from  the  Escalante  Canyon 
Region  of  Garfield  County  in  south-central  Utah.  The  new  species  is  unique  among  North  American 
Baetis  in  having  gill  number  one  highly  reduced  or  absent.  Labial  morphology  and  overall  setation 
characteristics  indicate  a  close  relationship  between  B.  moqui  and  the  northern  California  species 
Baetis  alius  and  the  eastern  North  American  species  Baetis  phtto.  An  updated  key  to  the  North 
American  Baetis  larvae  is  provided. 

KEYWORDS:  Ephemeroptera,  Baetidae,  Baetis,  new  species,  Utah 

Morihara  and  McCafferty  (1979)  provided  the  most  recent  revision  of  those 
North  American  small  minnow  mayfly  species  considered  in  the  Arctogean 
(Holarctic  +  Oriental  +  Afrotropical)  genus  Baetis  Leach.  Since  then,  considerable 
phylogenetic  research  within  the  family  Baetidae  has  led  to  an  explosion  of  new 
genera  and  a  further  restriction  of  Baetis  to  selected  species  within  the  Baetis 
complex  of  genera,  defined  by  two  larval  apomorphies:  possession  of  a  femoral 
villopore  and  flat-tipped  setae  on  the  antennal  flagella,  abdominal  segments,  and 
caudal  filaments  (Waltz  and  McCafferty  1987;  Gaino  and  Rebora  1999). 

Presently  2 1  North  American  species  are  considered  within  the  genus  Baetis, 
eight  of  which  are  known  only  from  adults.  In  North  America,  most  Baetis 
species  are  considered  members  of  three  species  groups  (Morihara  and  McCaf- 
ferty 1979):  The  fuscatus  group,  which  includes  the  species  Baetis  carinus  Ed- 
munds and  Allen,  Baetis  flavistriga  McDunnough,  Baetis  intercalaris  McDun- 
nough,  Baetis  notos  Allen  and  Murvosh,  and  Baetis  rusticans  McDunnough;  The 
rhodani  group,  which  includes  the  species  Baetis  adonis  Traver,  Baetis  bicauda- 
tus  Dodds,  Baetis  diablus  Day,  Baetis  foemina  McDunnough,  Baetis  magmis 
McCafferty  and  Waltz,  Baetis  palisadi  Mayo,  Baetis  parallelus  Banks,  Baetis 
persecutor  McDunnough,  Baetis  piscatoris  Traver,  and  Baetis  tricaudatus 
Dodds;  The  vernus  group,  which  includes  Baetis  brunneicolor  McDunnough, 
Baetis  bundyae  Lehmkuhl,  and  Baetis  hudsonicus  Ide.  The  Northern  California 
species  Baetis  alius  Day,  and  the  principally  Appalachian  species  Baetis  pinto 
McDunnough  have  never  been  assigned  to  any  species  group,  although  their 
adult  male  genitalia  would  seem  to  indicate  a  close  relationship  to  those  species 
considered  within  the  fuscatus  species  group. 

A  new  species  is  described  from  larvae  collected  from  the  Escalante  Canyon 
Region  of  Garfield  County  in  south-central  Utah.  This  new  species  along  with 


1  Received  on  May  30,  2002.  Accepted  on  August  4,  2004. 

MFG,  Inc.  Consulting  Scientist  and  Engineers,  4807  Spicewood  Springs  Road.  Building  4.  Austin 
TX  78759,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  RileyNelson@byu.edu. 

'Department  of  Integrative  Biology,  401  Widtsoe  Building,  Brigham  Young  University,  Provo,  UT 
84602,  U.S.A.  E-mail  (CRN):  RileyNelson@byu.edu. 

*  Department  of  Evolution,  Ecology,  and  Organismal  Biology,  Aquatic  Ecology  Laboratory,  The  Ohio 
State  University,  1314  Kinnear  Road,  Columbus,  OH  43229  U.S.A.  E-mail:  kuehnl.2@osu.edu. 

Mailed  on  January-  19.  2005 


140  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


B.  alius  and  B.  pluto  are  hereby  considered  as  members  of  the  newly  recognized 
alius  species  group  based  on  similarities  of  the  labium  (elongate  palpal  segments, 
elongate  glossae  and  paraglossae,  submentum  and  menrum;  palpal  segment  two 
with  moderately  developed  distomedial  projection  and  convex  medial  margin), 
and  adult  male  genital  forceps  (forceps  of  generally  fuscatus  type,  with  segment 
one  lacking  a  distinct  distomedial  protuberance). 


Baetis  moqui,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-6) 

Diagnosis.  The  highly  reduced  and  often  absent  nature  of  gill  1  distinguishes 
B.  moqui  from  all  other  North  American  Baetis.  In  North  America,  larvae  of 
Americabaetis  Kluge  and  Diphetor  Waltz  and  McCafferty  are  the  only  other 
Baetidae  that  lack  gill  1.  The  distinct  structure  of  the  labial  palpi  will  also  serve 
to  distinguish  B.  moqui  from  all  other  North  American  Baetis  with  the  exception 
of  B.  alius.  The  wide  first  denticles  of  the  mandibular  incisors  (Figs.  2  and  3); 
apically  narrower,  distomedially  projecting  paraglossae  (Fig.  4);  abdominal  ter- 
gal patterning;  and  reduced  or  absent  gill  1  (Fig.  5)  of  B.  moqui  will  serve  to  dis- 
tinguish it  from  the  larvae  of  B.  alius.  Additionally,  the  dorsal  setae  of  labial  palpi 
segment  two  (Fig.  13)  in  B.  alius  tend  to  be  arranged  in  a  vertically  oriented 
straight  line,  where  as  those  of  B.  moqui  usually  have  a  more  or  less  clumped 
arrangement  (Fig.  4).  Mouthpart  setation  has  proven  to  be  considerably  variable 
within  most  mayflies,  thus  the  above  feature  may  be  of  limited  use. 

Description  of  the  larva.  Body  length:  5.8-7.0  mm,  cerci  4.5-5.2  mm,  medial  caudal  filament 
2.8-3.2  mm.  Head:  Head  capsule  almost  entirely  brown,  frontal  and  region  around  epicranial  suture 
usually  pale.  Antennae  extending  to  at  least  first  abdominal  segment;  scape  and  pedicel  brown,  fla- 
gella  pale  with  brown  apices.  Labrum  as  in  Figure  1 .  Maxillae  with  2-3  crest  setae;  palpi  extending 
beyond  galealacinial  crest,  segment  1  subequal  to  segment  2.  Mandibular  incisors  as  in  Figures  2  and 
3;  first  denticle  broad,  approximately  as  wide  as  denticle  2  and  3  combined.  Labium  as  in  Figure  4. 
Labial  palpi  segment  2  with  5-7  dorsal  setae  and  well  developed  distomedial  expansion  with  rough- 
ly convex  inner  margin.  Thorax:  Nota  with  extensive  dark  and  pale  markings.  Hindwingpads  well 
developed.  Legs  (Fig.  6)  with  dorsal  margin  of  femora  with  long,  stout  setae;  ventral  margin  with 
short  stout  setae;  outer  surface  with  numerous  stout  setae;  inner  surface  with  very  sparse  short,  stout 
setae;  dorsal  margin  of  tibial  and  tarsi  with  very  short  stout  setae;  ventral  margin  with  longer  stout 
setae;  femora  with  broad,  medial,  brown  band  and  dark  brown  distally.  Claws  with  9-13  denticles. 
Abdomen:  Gill  1  highly  reduced  or  absent,  when  present  similar  to  Figure  5.  Gills  2-7  elongate;  gill 
4  with  greatest  length.  Terga  1  with  posterior  three-fourths  dark  brown,  anterior  fourth  pale;  terga  2- 
4  entirely  dark  brown  with  large  pale,  paired,  submedial  round  areas,  pale  anterolateral  corners,  and 
often  with  pale,  vertically  oriented,  medial  band;  terga  5-6  mostly  pale  with  darkened  posterolateral 
corners  and  often  some  dark  medial  patterning;  terga  7-8  entirely  dark  brown  except  pale  anterolat- 
eral corners;  terga  9-10  generally  pale,  occasionally  with  some  minor  medial  brown  patterning. 
Sterna  pale  brown  with  weak  tracheation  marks;  sterna  7-8  dark  brown  giving  segments  7  and  8 
banded  appearance.  Caudal  filaments  pale  with  darkened  apices  and  often  darkened  basally. 

Type  Material.  HOLOTYPE:  male  larva,  UTAH:  Garfield  Co.,  North  Creek,  above  North  Creek 
Reservoir,  8.2  mi  from  Hwy  12,  North  Creek  Road,  July  09,  2001,  K.  F.  Kuehnl  (deposited  in  the 
Purdue  University  Entomological  Research  Collection).  Paratypes:  10  larvae  same  locality  and  dep- 
osition as  holotype;  2  larvae,  North  Creek,  above  North  Creek  Reservior,  7  mi  from  Hwy  12,  North 
Creek  Road,  July  06,  2001,  K.  F.  Kuehnl  (deposited  in  Monte  L.  Bean  Life  Science  Museum,  BYU). 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 141 

Additional  Material.  UTAH:  Garfield  Co.,  Pine  Creek,  Box  Death  Hollow  trailhead.  Pine  Creek 
Road,  June  28,  2001,  K.  F.  Kuehnl  (20  larvae,  personal  collection  of  NAW  and  BYU). 

Specific  Epithet.  Moqui  is  an  early  name  attributed  to  the  Hopi  (Hopati  =  peaceful  ones)  tribe 
of  Pueblo  Indians. 

Remarks.  Baetis  moqui  larvae  have  been  collected  from  cold,  clear  water 
streams  draining  high  elevation  peaks  (-3000  m)  dominated  by  spring  snowmelt 
and  summer  monsoonal  rain  events.  Within  these  streams  B.  moqui  larvae  have 
been  found  on  a  variety  of  stream  substrates  including  leaf  packs  and  submerged 
vegetation  along  stream  margins,  but  most  commonly  on  fast  flowing  rocky  sub- 
strates including  leaf  packs  and  submerged  vegetation  along  stream  margins,  but 
most  commonly  on  fast  flowing  rocky  substrates  within  a  coarse  sand  matrix. 
Baetis  moqui  were  also  commonly  collected  at  a  lower  elevation  (-2250  m  to 
-2100  m)  from  North  and  Pine  Creeks  and  were  not  collected  at  the  confluence 
of  either  stream  with  the  Escalante  River  or  at  elevations  above  2250  m.  In  addi- 
tion, B.  moqui  was  apparently  absent  from  several  similar  adjacent  streams  in- 
cluding Sand,  Boulder,  Deer,  Steep,  and  Calf  Creeks,  which  were  sampled  and 
the  presence  of  B.  moqui  was  not  detected  at  any  elevation.  Overall  benthic 
macroinvertebrate  community  structure  was  similar  between  both  North  and  Pine 
Creeks.  Ecological  associates  found  commonly  with  B.  moqui  include  B.  tricau- 
datus,  B.  bicaudatus,  and  Ephemerella  dorothea  infrequens  McDunnough  and 
several  species  of  common  western  North  American  stoneflies  including 
Pteronarcella  badia  (Hagen),  Isoperla  sp.,  Sweltsa  coloradensis  (Banks),  and 
Amphinemura  sp. 

The  geological  formations  where  these  streams  flow  are  typical  for  southern 
Utah,  with  both  streams  flowing  largely  over  various  sandstones.  North  Creek 
originates  on  the  Aquarius  Plateau  (-3000  m)  and  traverses  through  the  Wah- 
weap  Formation  (light  gray  to  white,  medium-  to  coarse-grained  sandstone), 
Straight  Cliffs  Formation  (light  gray  to  white,  medium-  to  coarse-grained  sand- 
stone) and  finally  through  more  recent  alluvial  terrace  deposits  as  it  enters  the 
Escalante  River  (Doelling  and  Willis  1999).  The  headwaters  of  Pine  Creek  are 
located  on  Boulder  Mountain  (-3000  m)  where  it  starts  its  ascent  through  Navajo 
sandstone  (light-gray-orange,  white,  and  pink  medium-grained  sandstone)  then 
through  the  Carmel  Formation  and  Entrada  sandstones  (white  or  pale  orange  fine 
to  coarse-grained  sandstone)  before  entering  the  Escalante  River  (Doelling  and 
Willis  1999).  Somewhat  uncharacteristic  of  southern  Utah,  both  North  Creek  and 
Pine  Creek  are  clear  water  streams  with  low  sediment  loads.  The  Escalante  River 
above  and  between  these  two  creeks  passes  through  substantial  alluvium  deposits 
and  a  thin  layer  of  Tropic  shale  thus  increasing  the  sediment  load  and  overall  tur- 
bidity within  the  river  causing  a  white  murky  appearance. 


142 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


-.,- 


"N 


Figures  1-6.  B.  moqui,  n.  sp.:   1.  Labrum.  2.  Right  mandibular  incisors.  3.  Left  mandibu- 
lar  incisors.  4.  Labium.  5.  Abdominal  terga  1-2.  6.  Femora. 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 


143 


Figures  7-17.  Figs.  7-8,  B.  bicaitdatus.  posterior  abdominal  terga  and  partial  caudal  fila- 
ments. Figs.  9-10,  B.  magnus,  9.  Antennal  scape  and  pedicel.  10.  Labial  palpi.  Figs.  11- 
13,  B.  alius,  11.  Right  mandibular  incisors.  12.  Left  mandibular  incisors.  13.  Labial 
palpi.  Figs.  14-15,  B.  intercalans,  14.  Glossae.  15.  Labial  palpi.  Figs.  16-17,  B.  flav- 
istriga,  16.  Glossae.  17.  Labial  palpi. 


144  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


KEY  TO  NORTH  AMERICAN  BAETIS  LARVAE 

The  following  key  includes  only  those  North  American  larvae  presently  consid- 
ered within  the  genus  Baetis.  It  is  presented  in  order  to  complement  the  key  found 
in  Morihara  and  McCafferry  (1979),  not  replace  it.  Identifications  should  still  be 
confirmed  by  reference  to  the  larval  descriptions  and  diagnosis  provided  in 
Morihara  and  McCafferty  (1979). 

la.  Median  caudal  filament  usually  reduced  to  short  stub  (Fig.  6;  Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig. 
17f),  occasionally  up  to  approximately  0.2  length  of  cerci,  distinctly  tapering  and  without  fringe  of  fine 

setae  (Fig.  7)  2 

Ib.  Median  caudal  filament  at  least  0.4  the  length  of  cerci,  lateral  margins  of  median  caudal  filament 
more  parallel  in  nature  and  with  fringe  of  fine  setae  in  at  least  apical  half  (Morihara  and  McCafferty 
1979  Figs.  24e,  25e)  3 

2a.  Gills  elongate,  more  than  twice  as  long  as  wide  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  18e);  restrict- 
ed to  the  Canadian  tundra Baetis  foemina 

2b.  Gills  not  elongate,  less  than  twice  as  long  as  wide  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  17g);  wide- 
spread across  western  North  America Baetis  bicaudatus 

3a.  Antennal  scape  and  pedicel  with  robust  setae  (Fig.  9;  Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  18a); 

paraproct  surface  with  robust  setae  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  1 1) 4 

3b.  Antennal  scape  and  pedicle  without  robust  setae  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Figs.  25a,  26a); 
paraproct  surface  without  robust  setae  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  10)  6 

4a.  Gill  margins  with  large  robust  setae  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Figs.  19g,  20g)  and  serrate  or 

not  serrate  5 

4b.  Gill  margins  without  large  robust  setae  and  serrate  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  12) 

Baetis  tricaudatus 

5a.  Posterior  margins  of  terga  with  robust  setae  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  20f);  labial  palpi 
elongate,  segment  2  greater  than  two  times  as  long  and  basal  width  of  segment  3  (Fig.  10;  Morihara  and 

McCafferty  1979  Fig.  20b) Baetis  magnus 

5b.  Posterior  margins  of  terga  without  robust  setae  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  19e);  labial 

palpi  not  elongate  as  above,  segment  2  less  than  two  times  as  long  as  basal  width  of  segment 3 

(Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  19a)  Baetis  adonis 

6a.  Gills  elongate,  more  than  twice  as  long  as  wide  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Figs.  22e,  23f); 
principally  restricted  to  Canadian  tundra,  rarely  found  in  Northeastern  Wisconsin  and  Northern  Rocky 

Mountains  of  Wyoming 7 

6b.  Gills  not  elongate  as  above,  equal  to  or  less  than  twice  as  long  as  wide;  widespread 8 

7a.  Median  caudal  filament  almost  equal  in  length  to  cerci Baetis  hudsonicus 

7b.  Median  caudal  filament  approximately  0.5-0.8  length  of  cerci  Baetis  bundyae 

8a.  Labial  palpi  slender,  segment  2  at  least  twice  as  long  and  basal  width  of  segment  3  (Figs.  4  and  13; 
(Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Figs.  33c  and  36c);  inner  margin  of  labial  palpi  segment  2  convex 

(Figs.  4  and  13;  Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Figs.  33c  and  36c) 9 

8b.  Labial  palpi  more  robust  than  above,  segment  2  less  than  twice  as  long  as  basal  width  of  segment 
3  (Figs.  15  and  17;  Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Figs.  21b,  24c,  25c,  26c);  inner  margin  of  labial 
palpi  segment  2  concave  (Figs.  15  and  17;  Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Figs.  21b,  24c,  25c,  26c)l  1 

9a.  Caudal  filaments  with  near  medial  band  of  darkened  segments  similar  to  ( Morihara  and  McCafferty 

1979  Figs.  24e,  25e);  eastern  North  American  species,  with  principally  Appalachian  distribution 

Baetis  pinto 

9b.  Caudal  filaments  generally  uniform  in  color,  without  near  medial  band  of  darkened  segments;  west- 
ern North  American  species,  west  of  the  Continental  Divide 10 

lOa.  Gill  1  highly  reduced  or  absent  (Fig.  5);  inandibular  incisors  with  broadened  first  denticle,  approx- 
imately as  wide  as  denticle  2  and  3  combined  (Figs.  2  and  3) Baetis  moc/ni 


Vol.  115,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004  145 


lOb.  Gill  1  not  highly  reduced  or  absent;  mandibular  incisor  denticulation  not  as  above,  denticle  1 
approximately  equal  in  width  to  that  of  denticle  2  or  3  (Figs.  1 1  and  12;  Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979 
Fig.  33b) Baetis  alms 

\  la.  Labial  palpi  with  medial  lobe  of  segment  2  moderately  developed  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979 

Fig.  21b);  pronotum  almost  uniformly  shaded  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  21e) 

Baetis  brunneicolor 

lib.  Labial  palpi  with  medial  lobe  of  segment  2  poorly  developed  (Figs.  15  and  17;  Morihara  and 
McCafferty  1979  Figs.  24c,  25c,  26c);  pronotum  with  inverted  U-shaped  mark  (Morihara  and 
McCafferty  1979  Figs.  24e,  25e,  26d) 12 

12a.  Caudal  filaments  without  medial  band  of  darkened  segments;  abdominal  terga  with  distinctive 

patterning  similar  to  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Figs.  14e,  26e);  southwestern  species 

Baetis  notos 

12b.  Caudal  filaments  usually  with  medial  band  of  darkened  segments  (Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979 
Figs.  24e,  25e);  abdominal  terga  not  patterned  as  above,  usually  similar  to  (Morihara  and  McCafferty 
1979  Figs.  24e  or  25e);  principally  distributed  across  eastern  North  America,  rarely  found  in  the 
Southwest 13 

13a.  Labial  palpi  segment  3  expanded  distomedially,  giving  an  almost  truncate  appearance  (Fig.  15; 
Morihara  and  McCafferty  1979  Fig.  24c);  glossae  with  outer  margin  expanded  and  well  rounded  (Fig. 
14);  darker  well  marked  abdominal  terga  with  three,  posterior  round,  pale  areas  (Morihara  and 

McCafferty  1979  Figs.  24e);  or  entirely  uniformly  shaded  with  brown Baetis  intercalaris 

13b.  Labial  palpi  segment  3  not  as  above,  distal  margin  evenly  rounded  (Fig.  17;  Morihara  and 
McCafferty  1979  Fig.  25c);  glossae  without  expanded  outer  margin  (Fig.  16);  darker  well  marked 
abdominal  terga  with  two  large,  often  kidney-shaped  submedial  pale  areas  (Morihara  and  McCafferty 
1979  Fig.  25e) Baetis  flavistriga 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  would  like  to  thank  Drs.  B.  C.  Kondratieff  (Colorado  State  University,  Fort  Collins,  Colorado) 
and  W.  P.  McCafferty  (Purdue  University,  West  Lafayette,  Indiana)  for  their  helpful  critiques  of  an  early 
manuscript  of  this  publication.  Drs.  W.  J.  Pulawski  and  R.  L.  Zuparko  (California  Academy  of  Sciences, 
San  Francisco,  California)  are  thanked  for  the  loan  of  B.  alius  type  material.  We  would  like  to  thank  Dr. 
Richard  Baumann  for  his  support  in  this  project.  Harry  Barber  and  the  Bureau  of  Land  Management  are 
thanked  for  their  support. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Doelling,  H.  H.  and  G.  C.  Willis.  1999.  Interim  geologic  map  of  the  Escalante  and  parts  of  the  Loa 
and  Hite  crossing  30'  x  60'  quadrangles,  Garfield  and  Kane  counties,  Utah.  Utah  Geological  Survey. 
Open-File  Report  368.  22  pp. 

Gaino,  K.  and  M.  Rebora.  1999.  Flat-tipped  sensillum  in  Baetidae  (F.phemeroptera):  a  microcharac- 
ter  for  taxonomic  and  phylogenetic  considerations.  Invertebrate  Biology.  1  IS:  6S-74. 

Morihara,  I).  K.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1979.  The  Baetis  larvae  of  North  America  (Ephemeroptera: 
Baetidae).  Transcations  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  105:  139-221. 

Waltz,  R.  D.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1987.  New  genera  of  Baetidae  for  some  Nearctic  species  previ- 
ously included  in  Baetis  Leach  (Ephemeroptera).  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America 
80:  667-670. 


146  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


A  WINTER  PITFALL  TECHNIQUE  FOR 
WINTER-ACTIVE  SUBNIVEAN  FAUNA1 

P.  Paquin2 

ABSTRACT:  An  adapted  pitfall  trap  is  described  to  sample  the  subnivean  fauna  active  between  the 
frozen  ground  and  snow  layers.  A  pitfall  trap  is  placed  in  a  frame  adaptor  before  the  first  snow.  An 
apparatus  made  of  two  wood  boxes  is  placed  over  the  pitfall;  the  frame  box  has  no  bottom  and  allows 
access  to  the  pitfall  from  the  top  to  gather  samples.  The  open  sides  at  the  bottom  allow  organisms  to 
enter  the  pitfall  through  the  subnivean  space.  The  bottom  portion  of  the  second  box  is  closed  and 
accumulates  fallen  snow.  To  service  the  traps,  the  removable  snow  column  is  lifted  giving  full  access 
to  the  pitfall  trap.  The  use  of  a  fine  mesh  sifter  improves  the  efficiency  of  the  gathering  of  the  sam- 
ples; all  sizes  of  organisms  are  transferred  to  alcohol  in  a  single  and  simple  procedure  that  avoids 
damaging  specimens.  Two  factors  related  to  the  trap  were  studied:  1 )  the  winter-trap  did  not  cause 
any  cold  air  induction  to  the  subnivean  level;  the  temperature  averaged  -5°C  both  under  the  snow 
and  in  the  trap  providing  a  stable  environment  despite  ambient  temperature  variations  above  the 
snow.  2)  Trampling  of  the  surrounding  snow  caused  by  the  regular  servicing  of  the  traps  had  no 
effect  on  the  presence  or  absence  of  taxa  collected,  although  a  significant  effect  on  the  numbers  of 
Acarina  was  observed. 

KEY  WORDS:  Winter,  sampling,  snow,  microhabitat 

The  subnivean  space  is  the  habitat  between  the  frozen  ground  surface  and  the 
snow  layer.  It  originates  from  bacterial  activity  in  the  ground  layers  (Coxson  and 
Parkinson,  1987)  that  creates  CO9  and  water  vapor.  The  gas  pressure  erodes  the 
snow  layer  in  contact  with  the  ground  in  an  upward  movement  (Pruitt  1970).  In 
combination  with  the  frozen  ground  surface  heterogeneity,  this  ongoing  activity 
results  in  a  space  of  variable  dimensions,  from  a  fine  network  of  a  few  mm  up  to 
8  cm  (Coulianos  and  Johnels,  1962). 

The  ecological  stability  of  the  subnivean  space  strongly  depends  on  the  insu- 
lating properties  of  the  snow  (Mail,  1930;  Nasmark,  1964;  Aitchison,  1974).  Ac- 
cording to  Pruitt  ( 1970),  snow  accumulation  of  20  cm  is  the  threshold  at  which 
subnivean  temperature  becomes  independent  of  ambient  temperature,  resulting 
in  a  stable  environment.  Well-adapted,  winter-active  fauna  circulate  in  this  habi- 
tat (Aitchison,  1979a,  b,  c,  d,  1984;  Merriam  et  al.,  1983)  but  remain  understud- 
ied due  to  the  difficulty  of  sampling  this  fauna.  Pitfall  traps  have  been  used 
extensively  in  ecological  assessment,  and  several  modifications  were  made  to 
improve  the  efficiency  or  to  better  suit  particular  habitats.  To  study  subnivean 
fauna,  Aitchison  (1974;  1979a)  used  a  modified  pitfall  technique,  elaborated 
from  Nasmark  (1964),  consisting  of  a  roof  installed  over  the  pitfall  to  prevent 
snow  accumulation  in  the  trap.  However,  this  method  was  found  inadequate  for 
winter  conditions  where  snow  accumulated  up  to  1  meter. 


1  Received  on  July  7,  2004.  Accepted  on  July  20,  2004. 

2  Department  of  Biology,  San  Diego  State  University,  5500  Campanile  Drive,  San  Diego,  CA  92182- 
4614,  U.S.A.   E-mail:  paquinptaimlink.net. 

ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  115(3):  121,  May  &  June  2004 
Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


Vol.  115.  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 147 

This  paper  describes  a  new  type  of  winter  pitfall  trap  and  inherent  method- 
ologies that  improve  and  facilitate  collecting  samples  in  winter  conditions.  Two 
factors  regarding  the  technique  were  also  investigated:  cold  air  induction  at  the 
subnivean  level  due  to  the  winter-trap  and  the  effect  of  snow  trampling  due  to  the 
servicing  of  the  traps  on  a  regular  basis. 

METHODS 

1 )  Study  area 

This  study  was  conducted  in  the  southern  mixed-boreal  forest  of  the  Lake 
Duparquet  area,  Quebec,  Canada  (48°  30'  N,  79°  13'  W).  At  this  latitude,  the 
snow  covers  the  ground  for  approximately  6  months,  -  -  October  to  March  - 
and  traps  were  used  over  that  period.  The  traps  were  tested  in  each  of  the  major 
forest  types  of  the  mixed  boreal  succession:  deciduous  stands,  dominated  by 
aspen  (Populus  tremuloides  Michx.),  the  mixed  stands,  which  consisted  of  bal- 
sam fir  (Abies  balsamea  [L.]  Mill.),  white  spruce  (Picea  glauca  [Moench]  Voss), 
paper  birch  (Betula  papyri/era  Marsh.)  and  some  P.  tremuloides  Michx.,  and  the 
coniferous  stands,  dominated  by  white  cedar  (Thuja  occidentalis  L.)  and  balsam 
fir  (Abies  balsamea  [L.]  Mill.).  See  Leduc  et  al.  (1995)  and  Bergeron  (2000)  for 
a  detailed  description  of  the  ecological  succession. 

2)  The  winter  pitfall  trap 

The  described  methods  were  used  over  three  winter  sampling  seasons  from 
1993  to  1996.  Dates  and  number  of  traps  used  are  given  in  table  1 .  Typically,  five 
winter  pitfall  traps  were  installed  in  a  transect  in  a  given  forest  site,  and  each  trap 
was  separated  from  the  next  by  a  distance  of  7-10  meters. 

Trap  installation 

The  winter-pitfall  trap  should  be  deployed  before  the  first  snow  falls,  ideally 
shortly  after  the  first  ground  frost.  The  installation  of  the  pitfall  trap  itself  (shown 
in  Fig.  la)  can  occur  earlier  in  the  season  before  the  installation  of  the  winter 
apparatus  (shown  in  Fig.  Ib). 

The  pitfall  trap  consisted  of  a  17  x  20  x  4  cm  solid  plastic  pan  inserted  in  a  28 
x  30  cm  wood  frame  adaptor.  The  adaptor  and  pitfall  used  are  commercially  avail- 
able from  Argiope®  as  items  BAG- 102  and  BAC-205.  The  edges  of  the  plastic 
pan  expanded  laterally  and  fitted  perfectly  into  a  groove  in  the  wood  frame.  The 
ground  was  cut  with  a  knife  around  the  adaptor.  The  middle  section  of  the  hole 
was  dug  deep  enough  (about  15  cm)  to  clear  the  pan  and  minimize  its  uplift  over 
the  adaptor  from  soil  and  ice  movements  caused  by  frequent  freeze  and  thaw 
cycles.  The  wooden  frame  was  fitted  flush  with  the  ground.  Brushing  around  the 
wood  frame  with  a  hand  broom  eliminated  free  particles  and  dirt  that  could  be 
drawn  into  the  pan  by  the  movement  of  air  when  emptying  the  traps.  After  pre- 
servative liquid  (30  percent  ethylene  glycol  mixture)  was  added  to  the  pan,  it  was 
placed  in  the  wooden  frame  adaptor  and  the  pitfall  was  ready  to  collect  (Fig.  la). 


148 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


100  cm 


removable  box 


37  cm 


70  cm 


frame-box 


2cm 


removable  DDK 


emovable  snow  colu 


t 


'   /'*.»*  *.»»v  J>-~ 

^  r.\  o£\  */.\  *v*  1-J 


%£££ 


t 


^ 


ethylene  glycol  mixture 


Figure  1.  Winter-trap  specifications  and  set-up,  a)  pitfall  and  wooden  frame  adaptor, 
b)  winter  apparatus  design  and  size  specifications,  c)  side  view  of  winter-trap,  specimens 
can  reachi  the  pitfall  through  the  2  cm  space  on  each  side  of  the  frame-box,  d)  removing 
the  snow  column  gives  access  to  the  pitfall,  which  is  lifted  by  hand  through  the  frame- 
box. 


The  next  step  consisted  of  setting  up  the  winter  device  (Fig.  Ib).  Two  inde- 
pendent sections  made  of  commercial  plywood  and  wood  blocks  were  assem- 
bled: the  frame-box  (the  outer  section  in  contact  with  the  ground)  and  the  remov- 
able column  (the  inner  box  with  a  closed  bottom).  Once  assembled,  the  frame- 
box  was  placed  on  the  ground  to  enclose  the  pitfall  (Figs.  Ib-c).  Four  blocks  (5 
x  10  x  10  cm,  see  Fig  Ib.)  at  the  bottom  comers  were  the  only  contact  with  the 
soil,  leaving  a  2  cm  space  between  all  sides  and  the  soil,  giving  free  access  to  the 
pitfall  (Figs.  Ib-c).  Three  inch  (7.6  cm)  nails  were  inserted  in  the  blocks,  allow- 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 149 

ing  the  frame-box  to  be  firmly  anchored  in  the  soil  (Figs.  Ic-d).  The  pitfall  pan 
was  then  filled  to  a  quarter  full  with  preservative  liquid  and  placed  in  the  adap- 
tor, which  was  reachable  through  the  frame-box.  The  removable  column  was 
then  fitted  into  the  frame-box.  A  rag  collar  was  placed  between  the  two  boxes  to 
prevent  cold  air  induction  in  the  apparatus,  and  a  polyethylene  band  was  tacked 
over  the  insulating  collar  to  prevent  it  from  icing  (Fig.  Ic).  The  column  was 
closed  at  the  bottom  and  snow  accumulated  inside  the  column  as  well  as  on  the 
ground,  but  the  subnivean  interstice  allowed  organisms  to  access  the  pitfall. 

Servicing  the  traps 

The  removable  column  was  lifted  slowly  to  prevent  any  strong  air  current  that 
could  have  caused  movement  of  debris  at  ground  level  entering  the  pitfall  (Fig. 
Id).  The  column  was  then  laid  on  its  side,  providing  a  straight,  working  surface 
for  the  subsequent  steps.  The  pan  was  then  removed  through  the  open  box  (Fig. 
Id)  and  the  contents  sifted  over  a  small  bucket  (Fig.  2a)  with  a  fine  mesh  nylon 
strainer  (110  urn).  The  contents  of  the  pan  and  the  pan  were  carefully  cleaned 
with  a  flask  of  ethyl  alcohol  over  the  strainer.  Specimens  were  then  concentrat- 
ed with  the  ethyl  alcohol  flask  to  the  center  of  the  strainer  (Fig.  2b).  The  strain- 
er was  then  flipped  over  a  funnel  fitted  to  a  cap  and  a  jar  (see  Fig.  2c),  and  a  final 
wash  with  alcohol  allowed  the  transfer  of  all  organisms  into  the  jar  in  one  sim- 
ple procedure  (Fig.  2d).  This  method  was  preferable  to  the  use  of  forceps  in  the 
field,  because  efficient  sorting  of  small  organisms  (such  as  mites)  requires  labo- 
ratory conditions  and  the  use  of  a  stereoscope. 

Resetting  the  trap 

The  outside  parts  of  the  pan  and  the  inner  sections  of  the  frame-box  must  be 
free  from  ice.  It  was  also  necessary  to  remove  the  ice  from  the  2  cm  space  at  the 
bottom  of  the  frame-box  to  ensure  free  access  from  the  subnivean  interstice.  The 
pan  was  placed  back  in  the  adaptor,  and  the  removable  column  was  fitted  back 
into  the  frame-box  and  re-isolated  with  the  rag  collar. 

3)  Factors  that  may  influence  trap  catch 

The  use  of  the  winter  pitfall  traps  for  two  seasons  (1993-1994  and  1994- 
1995),  raised  questions  about  possible  biases  associated  with  the  methodology. 
The  1995-1996  season  was  devoted  to  testing  two  factors  that  may  have  influ- 
enced catches:  1)  verification  whether  the  use  of  the  winter  pitfall  trap  caused 
cold  air  induction  in  the  subnivean  space  that  may  have  influenced  faunal  activ- 
ity; and  2)  testing  the  effect  of  the  trampling  of  snow  due  to  the  servicing  of  the 
traps  on  a  regular  basis. 


150 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figure  2.  Collecting  specimens  and  transfer  in  ethyl  alcohol,  a)  the  contents  of  the  pan 
are  sifted  though  a  fine  mesh  strainer  over  a  small  bucket,  b)  specimens  are  concentrated 
in  the  center  of  the  strainer  with  an  alcohol  flask,  c)  the  strainer  is  flipped  while  grabbing 
the  center  by  hand,  d)  specimens  are  washed  in  the  funnel  and  put  in  ajar. 


Cold  air  induction 

Before  winter,  a  pair  of  programmable  thermometers  with  probes  was  in- 
stalled a  few  millimeters  above  the  ground  surface.  One  was  placed  in  a  winter- 
trap  and  the  other  in  the  subnivean  space,  10  meters  away  from  the  trap.  The  tem- 
peratures and  snow  depth  were  noted  daily  for  the  first  two  months  of  winter 
(November  3,  1995  -  January  12,  1996). 

Trampling  effect 

Ten  winter  traps  were  set  up  in  a  transect  separated  from  each  other  by  7-10 
meters  in  the  cedar/balsam  fir  forest.  Five  traps  were  emptied  every  two  weeks 
(5  visits  in  total)  while  the  others  were  never  visited  before  a  final  visit  halfway 
through  the  winter  season  (February  12).  In  order  to  compare  the  trampling 
effect,  data  from  the  samples  that  were  collected  every  two  weeks  were  pooled 
for  each  trap.  The  five  traps  serviced  on  a  regular  basis  could  therefore  be  com- 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 151 

pared  with  the  five  traps  that  were  never  visited;  each  trap  having  been  active  for  the 
same  period  of  time.  Similarity  matrices  measuring  the  association  between  objects 
(samples)  were  calculated  with  SIMIL  3.01  in  the  R  package  (Legendre  and  Vaudor, 
1991 ).  The  Sorensen  (2a/2a+b+c)  -  presence/absence  sensitive  -  and  Steinhaus  coef- 
ficients (2W/A+B)  -  which  accounts  for  presence/absence  of  taxa  and  abundance  - 
were  selected  [see  Legendre  and  Legendre  (1998)  for  details].  Mantel  tests  (Mantel, 
1967)  were  then  performed  with  the  MANTEL  3.01  program  in  the  R  package.  This 
analysis  tests  by  permutation  the  correlation  between  the  similarity  matrices  (species 
x  stations)  and  a  binary  matrix  coding  for  treatment  (trampling/non-trampling),  as 
suggested  by  Legendre  and  Legendre  (1998)  for  similar  data. 


RESULTS 

The  specimens  collected,  summarized  in  Table  1 ,  are  given  to  show  the  diversity 
of  the  subnivean  fauna  collected  with  this  technique.  All  collections  occurred  in  the 
presence  of  a  snow  layer  that  covered  the  ground  for  about  six  months  at  this  latitude. 
A  total  of  22,419  specimens  were  collected  representing  13  orders.  An  average  of  19 
specimens  was  collected  per  trap/week.  Acarina  were  the  most  abundant  in  the  col- 
lections followed  by  Collembola,  Araneae,  and  Diptera. 


Table  1 .  Overiew  of  collected  organisms:  number  of  weeks  of  sampling,  number  of  traps,  and  abundance  of  organisms 

1993-94  1994-95  1995-96 

From  1  November  to  23  April  From  30  October  to  16  April  From  3  November  to  12  February 

25  weeks  24  weeks  10  weeks 

15  traps  (5  traps  per  forest  type)  30  traps  (10  traps  per  forest  type)  10  traps  (all  set  up  in  the  cedar  forest) 


Acarina 

Araneae 

Chilopoda 

Coleoptera  Staphynilidae  (A)' 

Coleoptera  others  (A) 

Coleoptera  immatures 

Collembola 

Diplopoda 

Diptera  (A) 

Diptera  immatures 

Homoptera  Aphididae 

Hymenoptera  (A) 

Lepidoptera  (A) 

Lepidoptera  immatures 

Opilio 

Pseudoscorpionida 

Symphyla 

Total 

Grand  total 
22419  organisms 


•  (A)  =  Adults 


Total  abundance 

Total  abundance 

Total  abundance 

2274 

4255 

4891 

622 

1745 

106 

2 

9 

0 

55 

254 

12 

10 

118 

2 

42 

51 

65 

958 

4227 

1005 

3 

0 

0 

101 

1401 

7 

11 

141 

6 

1 

3 

0 

6 

5 

1 

1 

5 

0 

2 

1 

0 

3 

3 

0 

1 

4 

0 

0 

10 

0 

4092 

12232 

6095 

152 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Cold  air  induction  test 

The  subnivean  temperature  was  similar  to  the  temperature  recorded  in  the 
winter-trap.  The  two  temperature  curves  were  barely  distinguishable  when  a 
snow  layer  was  present.  They  both  averaged  -5°C  with  a  snow  cover  of  20  cm  or 
more,  and  external  temperature  showed  little  influence,  despite  the  fact  that 
extreme  temperatures  (-40°C)  were  recorded  (Fig.  3). 


Temperature 


Minimum  air  temperature 
Minimum  subniveal  temperature 
Minimum  winter-trap  temperature 


Snow 
depth 

(cm) 


Figure  3.  Relation  between  air,  subniveal,  and  winter-trap  minimum  temperature  and 
snow  depth.  The  data  were  gathered  from  November  3,  1995  to  February  12,  1996,  with 
2  programmable  thermometers:  one  placed  in  a  pitfall  trap  and  a  second  one  placed  in  the 
subnivean  space  a,  10  meters  away  from  the  trap. 


Trampling  effect 

The  Mantel  correlation  done  with  the  Sorensen  similarity  matrix  did  not  reveal 
any  significant  relationship  between  the  traps  visited  every  two  weeks  and  those 
only  emptied  at  the  end  of  the  experiment.  However,  in  using  the  Steinhaus  coef- 
ficient, which  also  accounts  for  abundance,  a  significant  relation  was  found  (R  = 
0.357;  P  =  0.0176).  A  third  analysis  using  the  Steinhaus  coefficient  excluding 
Acarina  was  not  significant  (Table  2). 

DISCUSSION 

The  techniques  described  above  allow  sampling  in  winter  conditions  charac- 
terized by  deep  snow  accumulation,  which  was  not  possible  with  previously 
known  methods.  The  high  number  of  specimens  collected  (22,419)  and  the  gen- 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 153 

eral  richness  are  evidence  of  the  success  of  the  method.  Effectiveness  was  diffi- 
cult to  compare  with  other  studies  done  on  subnivean  fauna  because  of  differ- 
ences in  habitat,  trapping  effort,  experimentation  time,  and  differences  in  latitude 
and  related  winter  conditions.  However,  Nasmark  (1964)  reported  an  average  of 
12  organisms  per  trap/week  while  this  study  found  an  average  of  19  organisms 
per  trap/week.  The  numbers  of  arthropod  orders  collected  in  this  study  (13 
orders)  is,  however,  similar  to  the  results  Merriam  et  al.  (1983)  (13  orders)  and 
Nasmark  (1964)  (1 1  orders).  Interestingly,  numbers  of  Acarina  found  in  the  two 
later  studies  were  low:  a  total  of  127  mites  found  by  Merriam  et  al.  (1983)  and 
79  by  Nasmark  (1964)  compared  to  the  1 1,420  mites  collected  in  this  study.  This 
striking  difference  could  be  attributed  to  a  deficiency  in  the  other  methodologies 
in  collecting  smaller  organisms,  but  also  to  faunistic  differences  between  forest 
habitats,  which  makes  comparison  of  results  hazardous.  The  results  of  this  study, 
however,  clearly  show  that  this  methodology  is  well-suited  to  smaller  organisms. 
Several  points  can  be  made  regarding  the  advantages  of  the  winter  pitfall  trap 
technique  described  here.  1 )  The  surface  covered  by  the  pitfall  is  bigger,  1 7  x  20 
cm  compared  with  8  cm  as  used  by  Nasmark  (1964),  Aitchison  (1984)  and 
Itamies  and  Lindgren  (1989).  A  better  trapping  effort  minimizes  variability 
among  samples,  which  is  a  problem  with  pitfall  trapping  (Adis,  1979).  2)  The 
use  of  a  wood  frame  adaptor  reduces  the  amount  of  dirt  and  particles  in  the  sam- 
ples, which  saves  a  lot  of  sorting  time  in  the  laboratory.  3)  A  removable  pitfall 
allows  one  to  replace  the  pan  when  damaged,  which  occurs  easily  in  cold  weath- 
er. 4)  The  use  of  the  technique  shown  in  figures  2a-d  is  important  for  collecting 
very  small  arthropods,  such  as  mites.  The  method  of  transfer  of  specimens  into 
alcohol  is  appropriate  for  all  sizes  and  allows  one  to  do  it  in  a  single  and  simple 
procedure  while  avoiding  damage  to  specimens.  Delicate  manipulations  with 
forceps  or  brushes  (Aitchison  1984)  are  hazardous  in  windy  situations  as  well  as 
unreliable  for  smaller  specimens.  5)  This  method  allows  one  to  reuse  ethylene 
glycol  and  verify  its  concentration  in  a  routine  procedure.  6)  The  use  of  a 
removable  snow  column  ensures  that  identical  insulating  conditions  are  found 
under  the  trap  and  in  the  subniveal  environment.  7)  The  total  time  required  to 
service  one  winter-trap  is  brief,  averaging  7  minutes.  Such  efficiency  is  impor- 
tant when  a  high  number  of  traps  have  to  be  visited. 

Cold  air  induction  and  subnivean  temperature 

The  aim  of  this  simple  comparison  was  to  ensure  that  the  winter-trap  did  not 
create  a  cold  air  induction  to  the  subniveal  level  and  bias  the  specimens  collect- 
ed. Similar  temperatures  were  found  in  the  winter-trap  and  the  subniveal  envi- 
ronment. The  use  of  the  winter-trap  did  not  cause  any  detectable  cold  air  induc- 
tion that  could  create  biases.  The  minimum  temperature  reached  in  the  subniveal 
space  is  similar  to  that  observed  by  Aitchison  ( 1984)  and  Nasmark  (1964)  (aver- 
aging -5°C)  but  is  lower  than  the  average  reported  by  Mail  (1930),  Coulianos  and 
Johnels  (1962)  and  Hayward  (1965)  (being  just  under  the  freezing  point).  The 


154  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


latter  authors  may  have  obtained  a  slightly  higher  temperature  because  winter 
conditions  were  not  as  severe  where  they  conducted  their  experiments. 

Trampling  effect 

Trampling  of  snow  did  not  cause  any  effect  on  the  taxonomic  composition  of 
the  collections  at  the  order  level  with  the  Sorensen  coefficient,  which  is  only  sen- 
sitive to  presence/absence  of  taxa.  However,  the  use  of  the  Steinhaus  coefficient, 
which  is  abundance  sensitive,  revealed  a  significant  effect  (R  =  0.357,  P  = 
0.018).  The  trampling  effect  was  mainly  due  to  the  reduction  in  Acarina  abun- 
dance, as  shown  by  the  non-significant  result  when  mites  were  excluded  from  the 
analysis  using  the  same  coefficient  (R  =  0.21 1,  P  =  0.052).  Although,  the  latter 
values  were  close  to  a  significant  level  and  suggested  that  trampling  may  have 
also  affected  the  abundance  of  organisms  other  then  mites,  but  not  the  taxonom- 
ic composition  of  collected  orders. 

As  the  sampling  season  progressed,  the  snow  conditions  changed.  In  the  first 
part  of  the  season,  snow  depth  was  thin,  and  trampling  at  that  stage  may  cause 
snow  compaction  and  destruction  of  the  subnivean  space.  Although  the  com- 
paction may  only  be  temporary  due  to  the  continuous  bacterial  activity  that  re- 
stores the  subnivean  space,  working  only  on  one  side  of  the  trap  will  limit  bias- 
es, leaving  three  undisturbed  sides  for  full  access  to  the  pitfall  through  the  sub- 
nivean space.  As  the  season  progresses,  the  surface  snow  layer  develops  a  more 
robust  and  partially  iced  structure  that  can  easily  support  more  weight,  and  may 
cause  fewer  biases  in  collection. 

Technical  considerations  and  recommendations 

During  this  experiment,  methodological  problems  were  encountered  and  are 
briefly  mentioned  here.  Small  rodents  are  also  winter-active  in  the  subniveal 
environment  (Coulianos  and  Jonhels,  1962;  Hayward,  1965).  They  can  dig  tun- 
nels that  intercept  with  the  winter-trap.  There  was  not  enough  ethylene  glycol  to 
cause  drowning,  but  the  samples  were  contaminated  with  dirt,  feces  and  fleas. 
Although  requiring  more  hand-sorting  time,  specimens  were  still  as  numerous 
and  in  good  condition.  Also,  propylene  glycol  could  be  used  as  an  alternative  to 
ethylene  glycol,  as  it  is  less  toxic  to  mammals. 

Another  problem  can  occur  late  in  the  spring  when  the  melting  of  the  snow 
results  in  water  accumulation  under  the  residual  snow  and  causes  flooding  of  the 
forest  floor  (Jahn,  1970).  This  ecological  perturbation  in  forested  habitats  is  an 
important  mortality  factor  for  soil  organisms  (Joy,  1910;  Uetz  et  al.,  1979; 
Danks,  1991 ),  and  will  also  flood  the  winter  traps  and  ruin  samples.  Frequent  vis- 
its to  the  traps  at  this  critical  period  during  the  sampling  season  will  reduce  this 
effect  on  the  collections. 


Vol.  115,  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 155 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  would  like  to  thank  Real  Coderre  for  graciously  permitting  me  the  use  of  his  personal  snowmo- 
bile in  1993-94,  Richard  Baril  and  Guy  Chatelle  for  safety  arrangements  during  field  work,  Francois 
Lorenzetti  (UQAM;  Universite  du  Quebec  a  Montreal)  and  Daniel  Coderre  (UQAM)  for  comments 
and  suggestions  on  a  previous  draft  of  the  manuscript,  and  Sarah  Crews  and  Cor  Vink  (SDSU;  San 
Diego  State  University)  for  their  reviews  and  grammatical  improvements.  Comments  from  two 
anonymous  reviewers  also  helped  to  improve  the  manuscript. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Adis,  J.  1 979.  Problems  of  interpreting  arthropod  sampling  with  pitfall  traps.  Zoologische  Anzeiger 
202:  177-184. 

Aitchison,  C.  W.  1974.  A  sampling  technique  for  active  subnivean  invertebrates  in  southern 
Manitoba.  Manitoba  Entomologist  8:  32-36. 

Aitchison,  C.  W.  1979a.  Winter-active  subnivean  invertebrates  in  southern  Canada.  I.  Collembola. 
Pedobiologia  19:  113-120. 

Aitchison,  C.  W.  1979b.  Winter-active  subnivean  invertebrates  in  southern  Canada.  II.  Coleoptera. 
Pedobiologia  19:  121-128. 

Aitchison,  C.  W.  1979c.  Winter-active  subnivean  invertebrates  in  southern  Canada.  III.  Acari. 
Pedobiologia  19:  153-160. 

Aitchison,  C.  W.  1979d.  Winter-active  subnivean  invertebrates  in  southern  Canada.  IV.  Diptera  and 
Hymenoptera.  Pedobiologia  19:  176-182. 

Aitchison,  C.  W.  1984.  The  phenology  of  winter-active  spiders.  Journal  of  Arachnology  12: 
249-271. 

Bergeron,  Y.  2000.  Species  and  stand  dynamics  in  the  mixed  woods  of  Quebec's  southern  boreal 
forest.  Ecology  81:  1500-1516. 

Coulianos,  C.  C.  and  A.  G.  Johnels.  1962.  Note  on  the  subnivean  environment  of  small  mammals. 
Arkiv  forZooIogi  15:  363-370. 

Coxson,  D.  S.  and  D.  Parkinson.  1987.  Winter  respiratory  activity  in  Aspen  woodland  forest  floor 
litter  and  soils.  Soil  Biology  and  Biochemistry  19:  49-59. 

Danks,  H.  V.  1991.  Winter  habitats  and  ecological  adaptations  for  winter  survival,  pp  231-259  in 
R.E.  Lee  and  D.L.  Denlinger( Editors),  Insects  at  low  temperature.  Chapman  and  Hall,  New  York. 
513PP. 

Geiger,  R.  1950.  The  climate  near  the  ground.  Second  edition.  Harvard  University  Press,  Cam- 
bridge. 

Hayward,  J.  S.  1965.  Microclimate  temperature  and  its  adaptative  significance  in  six  geographic 
races  of  Peromyscus.  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  43:  341-350. 

liaimes  J.  and  E.  Lindgren.  1989.  What  food  is  there  available  for  shrews  during  the  winter? 
Aquilo  ser  Zoologica  24:  43^19. 

Jahn,  A.  1970.  Soil  movement  under  the  influence  of  freezing.  Pp  1 19-123  in  Ecology  of  the  sub- 
arctic regions.  UNESCO,  Paris. 

Joy,  N.  H.  191 0.  The  behaviour  of  Coleoptera  in  time  of  Hoods.  Transactions  of  the  entomological 
Society  of  London  4:  379-385. 

Leduc,  A.,  S.  Gauthier,  and  Y.  Bergeron.  1995.  Prevision  de  la  composition  d'une  mosai'que 
forestiere  naturelle  soumise  a  un  regime  de  feu:  proposition  d'un  modele  empirique  pour  le  Nord- 
Ouest  du  Quebec,  pp  197-205  in  G.  Domon  and  J.  Falardeau  (Editors)  Methodes  et  realisations 


156  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


de  1'ecologie  du  paysage  pour  ramenagement  du  territoire.  Polyscience  Publications,  Morin 
Heights,  Quebec.  227  pp. 

Legendre,  P.  and  L.  Legendre.  1998.  Numerical  Ecology.  Development  in  environmental  model- 
ling, 20.  Second  English  edition.  Elsevier,  New  York.  853  pp. 

Legendre  P.  and  A.  Vaudor.  1991.  Le  progiciel  R  -  Analyse  multidimensionnelle,  analyse  spatiale. 
Departement  de  sciences  biologiques.  Universite  de  Montreal.  144  pp. 

Mail,  G.A.  1930.  Winter  soil  temperatures  and  their  relation  to  subterranean  insect  winter  survival. 
Journal  of  Agricultural  Research  41:  571-592. 

Mantel,  N.  1967.  The  detection  of  disease  clustering  and  a  generalized  regression  approach.  Cancer 
Research  27:  209-220. 

Merriam,  G.,  J.  Wegner,  and  D.  Caldwell.  1983.  Invertabrate  activity  under  snow  in  deciduous 
woods.  Holarctic  Ecology  6:  89-94. 

Nasmark,  O.  1964.  Vinteraktivitet  under  snon  hos  landlevande  evertebrater  [Subniveal  winter 
activity  in  terrestrial  invertebrates].  Zoologisk  Revy  26:  5-15. 

Pruitt,  W.  O.  Jr.  1970.  Some  ecological  aspects  of  snow.  Pp  83-100  in  Ecology  of  the  subarctic 
region.  UNESCO,  Paris.  364  pp. 

Uetz,  G.  E.,  K.  L.  van  der  Laan,  G.  F.  Summers,  P.  A.  K.  Gibson,  and  L.  L.  Getz.  1979.  The 
effects  of  flooding  on  floodplain  arthropod  distribution  abundance  and  community  structure. 
American  Midland  Naturalist  101:  286-299. 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 157 

CROSSOCERUS  FLAVOMACULATUS,  A  NEW  SPECIES  OF 

THE  SUBGENUS  ACANTHOCRABRO  FROM  CHINA, 
WITH  A  KEY  TO  THE  CHINESE  SPECIES  OF  THE  SUB- 
GENUS  (HYMENOPTERA:  APOIDEA:  CRABRONIDAE)1 

Qiang  Li2  and  Junhua  He3 

ABSTRACT:  Crossocerus  (Acanthocrabro)  flavomaculatus  new  species  is  described  from  the  Bei- 
jing, Shandong,  and  Gansu  Provinces  in  China.  The  first  Chinese  records  are  given  for  C.  (A.) 
vagabundiis  vagabundus  (Panzer):  Sichuan  and  Yunnan  Province,  Tibet  Autonomous  Region,  and 
C.  (A.)  vagabundus  koreanus  Tsuneki:  Beijing,  Inner  Mongolian  Autonomous  Region,  Hubei  Pro- 
vince. A  key  to  Chinese  species  is  provided. 

KEY  WORDS:  Crossocerus,  Acanthocrabro,  Hymenoptera,  Apoidea,  Crabronidae,  China 

The  subgenus  Acanthocrabro  Perkins  occurs  in  the  Northern  Hemisphere 
where  it  is  represented  by  just  five  species:  annandali  (Bingham),  from  northern 
India;  maculipennis  (Smith),  from  North  America;  nitidiventris  (Fox),  from  east- 
ern North  America;  sauteri  Tsuneki,  from  Taiwan,  the  only  record  of  the  sub- 
genus  from  China  (Tsuneki,  1977);  and  vagabundus  (Panzer),  a  widespread  Pa- 
learctic  species.  During  our  study  of  Chinese  material  of  Acanthocrabro,  we  dis- 
covered a  new  species  and  also  discovered  that  A.  vagabundus  occurs  in  China. 
The  new  species  is  described  here  and  a  key  provided  for  the  identification  of  the 
Chinese  species  of  Acanthocrabro. 

For  the  identification  of  the  species  of  Acanthocrabro,  we  use  the  following 
subgenus  characters:  head  without  large,  median,  posteroventral  projection; 
occipital  carina  not  a  complete  circle;  mandible  with  a  tooth  on  inner  margin, 
with  3  teeth  in  female  and  2  or  3  teeth  in  male  at  apex;  flagellomere  III  not 
swollen  beneath;  propleuron  and  forecoxa  without  lateral,  large  projections; 
mesothorax  with  mesopleural  tubercle  in  female  and  most  male,  without  meso- 
pleural  tubercle  in  few  male;  male  with  forebasitarsus  usually  sinuate  or  twisted 
spirally,  metacoxa  edentate  apically;  gaster  yellow  maculate,  sessile;  metasomal 
tergum  II  without  large,  rounded,  deep  depression;  female  with  pygidial  plate 
usually  narrowed  and  excavated  apically;  male  with  tergum  VII  usually  large, 
near  broad  triangular  or  semicircular,  not  coarsely  punctate  than  penultimate  ter- 
gum (Bohart  and  Menke,  1976;  Krombein,  1979;  Leclercq,  1954,  1974,  2000; 
Marshakov,  1980;  Nemkov  et  al,  1995;  Oehlke,  1970;  Pulavskii,  1978;  Tsuneki, 
1954,  1968,  1990;  Yeo  and  Corbet,  1983). 

For  the  terminology  we  mainly  follow  Bohart  and  Menke  (1976).  The  abbre- 
viations HW,  HL,  POD,  OOD,  LTI,  and  WTI  are  used  for  head  width,  head 
length,  postocellar  distance,  ocellocular  distance,  maximum  length  of  tergum  I, 
and  maximum  width  of  tergum  I,  respectively. 


1  Received  on  September  20,  2002.  Accepted  on  August  23,  2004. 

2  The  Center  for  Agricultural  Biodiversity  Research  and  Training  of  Yunnan  Province,  Yunnan  Agri- 
cultural University,  Kunming,  Yunnan   Province  650201    People's  Republic  of  China.   H-mail: 
Iiqql962ta  vip.sina.com. 

'Department  of  Plant  Protection,  Agricultural  College,  Zhejiang  University,  Hangzhou,  Zhejiang 
310029  People's  Republic  of  China.  E-mail:  jhhew  zju.edu.cn. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


158  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SYSTEMATICS 
Key  to  the  females  of  the  subgenus  Acanthocrabro  from  China 

1.  Clypeal  margin  with  5  teeth  medially;  vertex  impunctate,  scutum  finely  punctate;  pygidial  plate 
without  median  longitudinal  carina;  midfemur  evidently  swollen C.  (A.)  sauteri  Tsuneki 

-  Clypeal  margin  with  2  or  3  teeth  medially;  vertex  densely  punctate,  scutum  coarsely,  densely  punc- 
tate; pygidial  plate  with  or  without  median  longitudinal  carina;  midfemur  slightly  swollen  2 

2.  Clypeus,  scutum,  prepectus,  mesopleuron,  propodeal  enclosure  and  gastral  tergum  1  with  large  yel- 
low spots;  large  portion  of  leg  and  gaster  yellow;  pygidial  plate  with  or  without  median  longitudinal 
carina  (Fig.  2)  C.  (A.)  flavomaculatus  sp.  nov. 

-  Clypeus,  scutum,  prepectus,  mesopleuron,  propodeal  enclosure  and  gastral  tergum  I  without  yel- 
low spot;  small  portion  of  leg  and  gaster  yellow;  pygidial  plate  with  median  longitudinal  carina  ...3 

3.  Orbital  foveae  large,  shallow;  mesopleuron  sparsely  punctate;  gastral  tergum  V  with  large  yellow 
spot C.  (A.)  vagabitndus  vagabundus  (Panzer) 

-  Orbital  foveae  small,  deep;  mesopleuron  densely  punctate;  gastral  tergum  V  without  yellow  spot. 
C.  (A.)  vagabundus  koreanus  Tsuneki 

Key  to  the  males  of  the  subgenus  Acanthocrabro  from  China 

[Male  of  C.  (A.)  sauteri  Tsuneki  is  unknown] 

1 .  Clypeal  margin  with  three  teeth  (Fig.  3);  mandible  apex  tridentate  (Fig.  4);  forefemur  without  pro- 
jection at  its  hind  surface;  mesopleuron  with  mesopleural  tubercle;  propodeal  enclosure,  gastral  terga 
I  and  IV  with  large  yellow  spots,  coxa  at  apex  and  tibia  yellow  C.  (A.)  flavomaculatus  sp.  nov. 

-  Clypeal  margin  with  broad,  large,  high  median  projection  and  one  or  two  lateral  teeth;  mandible 
apex  bidentate;  forefemur  with  projection  at  its  hind  surface;  mesopleuron  without  mesopleural 
tubercle;  propodeal  enclosure,  gastral  terga  I  and  IV  without  yellow  spot,  coxa  and  tibia  black  2 

2.  Median  clypeal  projection  broader  than  in  next  subspecies,  clypeus  with  two  lateral  teeth;  forefe- 
mur with  a  high,  triangular  projection  at  its  hind  surface  ..C.  (A.)  vagabundus  vagabundus  (Panzer) 

-  Median  clypeal  projection  narrower  than  in  previous  subspecies,  clypeus  with  one  lateral  tooth; 
forefemur  with  a  low,  round  projection  at  its  hind  surface C.  (A.)  vagabundus  koreanus  Tsuneki 


Crossocerus  (Acanthocrabro)  flavomaculatus,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  1-4) 

Diagnosis.  This  species  can  be  distinguished  from  Crossocerus  (A.)  vagabun- 
dus vagabundus  (Panzer)  and  Crossocerus  (A.)  vagabundus  koreanus  Tsuneki  by 
the  following  combination  of  characters:  mandible  apex  tridentate  in  male  (Fig. 
4),  clypeal  margin  with  a  low,  blunt  median  tooth  (Fig.  1,  3),  mesopleuron  with 
mesopleural  tubercle,  forefemur  without  projection  at  its  hind  surface,  and 
propodeal  enclosure  and  gastral  tergum  I  with  yellow  spots  in  male;  clypeus,  scu- 
tum, prepectus,  mesopleuron,  propodeal  enclosure  and  gastral  tergum  I  with  yel- 
low spots  in  female. 

Description.  Female.  Body  length  8.1-9.1  mm.  Head  black,  thorax  and  gaster  black  or  dark 
brown;  the  following  are  yellow:  mandible  largely,  clypeus  largely,  antenna!  scape,  pedicel  at  apex 
ventrally,  pronotal  collar  above,  pronotal  lobe,  lateral  spot  on  anterior  portion  of  scutum,  basal  half 
of  scutellum,  hind  portion  of  prepectus,  upper  spot  on  mesopleuron,  lateral  spot  on  propodeal  enclo- 
sure, tegula  partly,  tibia  largely,  basitarsus  largely,  femur  at  apex,  large  lateral  spot  or  transverse  band 
on  gastral  terga  I  -  V,  small  lateral  spots  on  sterna  II  and  III;  metanotum  with  or  without  yellow  spot; 
tarsomeres  II  -  V  largely  yellowish  brown  or  reddish  yellow.  Head  and  thorax  with  weak  steel  blue 
lustre. 

Anterior  margin  of  clypeus  slightly  prominent  medially  (Fig.  1).  Mandible  with  three  teeth  at  apex 
and  a  tooth  at  midlength  of  its  inner  margin.  Frons  without  supra-antennal  projection,  with  median 


Vol.  1 1 5,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 


159 


furrow;  upper  portion  of  frons  and  anterior  portion  of  vertex  densely,  coarsely  punctate,  posterior  por- 
tion of  vertex  densely,  coarsely  or  finely  punctate;  vertex  with  large,  oval  orbital  foveae.  HW:  HL: 
POD:  OOD  =  208:  141:  19:  31.  Relative  length  of  antennal  scape:  pedicel:  flagellomere  I:  II:  III:  IV: 
V  =  73:  16:  31:  17:  16:  16:  16. 

Lateral  corner  of  pronotal  collar  round.  Scutum  densely,  coarsely  punctate,  without  longitudinal 
rugae  adjacent  to  its  posterior  margin;  scutellum  sparsely  or  densely,  coarsely  punctate.  Metanotum 
densely,  finely  or  coarsely  punctate.  Mesopleuron  densely,  coarsely  punctate,  with  mesopleural  tuber- 
cle. Upper  portion  of  upper  metapleural  area  sparsely,  finely  punctate,  lower  portion  of  upper  meta- 
pleural  area  and  lower  metapleural  area  without  punctures.  Propodeal  enclosure  delimited  by  furrow, 
with  transverse  furrow  basally,  with  deep,  V-shaped  median  furrow;  posterior  surface  of  propodeum 
with  broad,  deep  median  furrow  on  its  upper  portion,  with  sparse  punctures,  with  short  median  cari- 
na,  some  transverse  carinae  and  long  or  short  lateral  longitudinal  carina  on  its  lower  portion; 
propodeal  side  with  dense,  fine,  short,  oblique  rugae  and  punctures  on  its  upper  portion,  with  dense 
or  sparse  punctures  on  its  median  portion,  without  punctures  on  its  lower  portion.  Hind  tibia  with 
spines  on  its  outer  surface. 

Gaster  not  petiolate,  tergum  I  sparsely  punctate.  LTI:  WTL  =  140:  141.  Pygidial  plate  with  or 
without  short  median  longitudinal  carina  (Fig.  2). 

Male.  Body  length  7.8  mm.  The  following  are  yellow:  mandible  largely,  pronotal  collar  above, 
pronotal  lobe,  scutellum  largely,  anterior  and  posterior  portions  of  prepectus,  lateral  spot  on  pro- 
podeal enclosure,  coxa  at  apex,  trochanter  wholly  or  largely,  fore  and  mid  femora  except  lateral  basal 
portion,  tibia  and  basitarsus  largely  or  partly,  transverse  bands  on  gastral  terga  I  -  IV,  lateral  spot  on 
tergum  VII,  transverse  bands  on  sterna  II  -  IV. 

Anterior  margin  of  clypeus  prominent  medially,  with  low,  blunt  median  tooth  and  lateral  tooth  on 
each  side  (Fig.  3);  mandible  with  three  teeth  at  apex  (Fig.  4);  orbital  foveae  smaller  than  in  female 
evidently.  HW:  HL:  POD:  OOD  =  175:  128:  17:  26.  Flagellum  ventrally  fringed  with  white  hair,  api- 
cal segment  normal.  Relative  length  of  antennal  scape:  pedicel:  flagellomere  I:  II:  III:  IV:  V  =  54:  11: 
26:  14:  12:  12:  12.  Punctures  on  thorax  and  gaster  smaller  than  in  female  evidently,  mesopleuron 
densely  or  sparsely,  finely  punctate.  LTI:  WTI  =  120:  127.  Gastral  tergum  VII  without  pygidial  plate. 

Material  examined.  Holotype.  9-  China,  Beijing,  Malianwa,  8  June  1975,  Chikun  Yang; 
deposited  in  the  Insect  Collections  of  China  Agricultural  University,  Beijing.  Paratypes:  ICf,  the 
same  data  as  holotype;  19,  China,  Shandong  Province,  Taian,  Mount  Tai,  26  June  1992,  Qiang  Li, 
deposited  in  the  Insect  Collections  of  Yunnan  Agricultural  University,  Kunming,  Yunnan  Prov  ince; 
l9.  China,  Gansu  Province,  Kou-ling,  13  September  1918,  coll.  Institute  of  Zoology,  Academia 
Sinica,  deposited  in  the  Insect  Collections  of  Institute  of  Zoology,  Academia  Sinica,  Beijing. 


Figs.  1-4.  Crossocerus  (Acanthocrabro)  flavomaculatus,  new  species.  1-2.  Female.  3-4. 
Male.  1,  3.  Frontal  view  of  clypeus.  2.  Dorsal  view  of  pygidial  area.  4.  Frontal  view  of 
mandible. 


160  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Distribution:  China:  Beijing,  Shandong  Province,  Gansu  Province. 

Etymology.  The  name,  flavomaculatus,  derived  from  Latin  Jlavus  (=  yellow)  and  Latin  macula- 
tits  (=  with  spot),  refers  to  the  clypeus,  scutum,  prepectus,  mesopleuron,  propodeal  enclosure  and  gas- 
tral  tergum  I  in  female  and  propodeal  enclosure  and  gastral  tergum  I  in  male  with  yellow  spots,  which 
is  one  of  the  main  recognition  characters  of  the  species. 


Crossocerus  (Acanthocrabro)  vagabundus  koreanus  Tsuneki,  1957, 
NEW  RECORD  FOR  CHINA 

Material  examined.  19.  China,  Beijing,  Baihuashan,  1200  m.  May  28,  1973,  Yongshan  Shi; 
399,  China,  Inner  Mongolia,  Chahar,  Yangklaping,  July  26,  1937  ( 19),  July  29,  1937  ( 19),  August 
2,  1937  (19),  O.  Pie;  Id1,  China,  Hubei  Province,  Shennongjia,  Dajiuhu,  1800  m,  August  1,  1981, 
Yinheng  Han. 

Distribution:  China:  Beijing,  Inner  Mongolian  Autonomous  Region,  Hubei  Province.  Korea: 
Zokurisan,  Taitimpyoo-Taihyoo,  Keijio  (Tsuneki,  1957:61). 


Crossocerus  (Acanthocrabro)  vagabundus  vagabundus  (Panzer,  1798), 

NEW  RECORD  FOR  CHINA 

Material  examined.  l9>  China,  Sichuan  Province,  Emeishan,  Qingyinge,  800-1000  m,  May  10, 
1957,  Zuocai  Yu;  19,  China,  Yunnan  Province,  Zhongdian,  Chongjianghe,  2400  m,  August  8,  1984, 
Ruiqi  Wang;  1C?,  China,  Tibet,  Bemi,  2300  m,  August  16,  1983,  Yinheng  Han. 

Distribution:  China:  Sichuan  Province,  Yunnan  Province,  Tibet  Autonomous  Region.  Palaearctic 
Region. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  are  grateful  to  Professor  Yan-Ru  Wu  (Institute  of  Zoology,  Academia  Sinica,  Beijing),  Pro- 
fessor Chikun  Yang  and  Professor  Wanzhi  Cai  (China  Agricultural  University,  Beijing),  Associate 
Professor  Tielu  Mo  (Shandong  Agricultural  University,  Shandong  Province),  Professor  Yalin  Zhang 
(Northwest  Sci-Tech  University  of  Agriculture  and  Forestry,  Shanxi  Province),  Professor  Lianfang 
Yang  (Nanjing  Agricultural  University,  Nanjing,  Jiangsu  Province),  Professor  Hong  Wu  (Zhejiang 
Forestry  College,  Zhejiang  Province),  Professor  Zaifu  Xu  (South  China  Agricultural  University, 
Guangdong  Province),  Professor  Xiaohong  Ou  (Southwestern  Forestry  College,  Yunnan  Province), 
and  Associate  Professor  Zongqi  Chen  (Academy  of  Agricultural  Science  and  Research,  Yunnan 
Province),  for  providing  us  with  specimens  deposited  in  the  insect  collections  under  their  care.  This 
research  has  been  funded  by  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  and  Natural  Science 
Foundation  of  Yunnan  Province.  We  also  thank  two  anonymous  reviewers  and  Dr.  Jorge  A.  Santiago- 
Blay  for  their  careful  consideration  of  this  manuscript. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bohart,  R.  M.  and  A.  S.  Menke.  1976.  Sphecid  wasps  of  the  world,  a  generic  revision.  University 
of  California  Press.  Berkeley,  California,  U.S.A.  695  pp. 

Krombein,  K.  V.  1979.  Superfamily  Sphecoidea.  pp.  1573-1740.  /;;.  Krombein,  K.  V,  Hurd,  P.  D. 
Jr.,  Smith,  D.  R,.  and  Burks,  B.  D.  (Editors).  Catalogue  of  Hymenoptera  in  America  North  of 
Mexico.  Smithsonian  Institution  Press,  Washington,  DC,  U.S.A.  2735  pp. 

Leclercq,  J.  1954.  Monographie  systematique,  phylogenetique  et  zoogeographique  des 
Hymenopteres  Crabroniens.  Les  Presses  de  «Lejeunia»,  Liege,  Belgium.  371  pp.  84  maps. 


Vol.  115.  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 161 

Leclercq,  J.  1974.  Moms,  types  et  neotypes  d'une  trentaine  de  Crabroniens  europeens  (Hymenop- 
tera  Sphecidae).  Bulletin  &  Annales  de  la  Societe  Royale  Beige  d'Entomologie  110:258-286. 

Leclercq,  J.  2000.  Hymenopteres  Sphecides  Crabroniens  des  Ameriques  du  genre  Crossocerus 
Lepeletier  &  Brulle,  1835.  Notes  Fauniques  de  Gembloux  40:3-75. 

Marshakov,  V.  G.  1980.  Fossorial  wasps  of  the  genus  Crossocerus  Lepeletier  et  Brulle  (Hymenop- 
tera,  Sphecidae)  from  Mongolia,  Kazakhstan  and  Middle  Asia.  Nasekomyie  Mongolii  7:336-365. 

Nemkov,  P.  G.,  V.  L.  Ka/enas,  E.  R.  Budrvs,  and  A.  V.  Antropov.  1995.  Nadsem.  Sphecoidea.  67. 
Sem.  Sphecidae  -  Royushchiye  osy,  p.  368-480  in  P. A.  Lehr  (editor).  Opredelitel'  nasekomykh 
Dal'nego  Vostoka  Rossii  v  shesti  tomakh.  Tom  IV.  Setchatokrylyie,  skorpionnitsy,  pereponcha- 
tokrylyie.  Chasf  1.  Nauka,  Sankt-Peterburg.  604  pp. 

Oehlke,  J.  1970.  Beitrage  zur  Insekten-Fauna  der  DDR:  Hymenoptera  -  Sphecidae.  Beitrage  zur 
Entomologie,  20:615-812. 

Pulavskii.  V.  V.  1978.  Nadsem.  Sphecoidea.  pp.  173-279.  In.  G.  S.  Medvedev  (editor).  Opredelitel' 
nasekomykh  evropeyskoy  chasti  SSSR,  Tom  III.  Pereponchatokrylyye,  Pervaya  chast.  Nauka. 
Leningrad,  Soviet  Union.  584  pp. 

Tsuneki,  K.  1954.  The  genus  Crossocerus  Lepeletier  et  Brulle  (1834)  of  Japan,  Korea,  Saghalien 
and  the  Kuriles  (Hymenoptera,  Sphecidae  Crabroninae).  Memoirs  of  the  Faculty  of  Liberal  Arts, 
Fukui  University  (Series  II,  Natural  Science)  3:57-78. 

Tsuneki,  K.  1957.  Verzeichnis  der  von  Herrn  Dr.  K.  Takeuchi  in  Korea  gesammelten  Crabroninen 
(Hymenoptera,  Sphecidae).  Akitu  6:59-62. 

Tsuneki,  K.  1968.  Studies  on  the  Formosan  Sphecidae  (V),  the  subfamily  Crabroninae  (Hymen- 
optera) with  a  key  to  the  species  of  Crabronini  occurring  in  Formosa  and  Ryukyus.  Etizenia  30: 1- 
34. 

Tsuneki,  K.  1977.  H.  Sauter's  Sphecidae  from  Formosa  in  the  Hungarian  Natural  History  Museum 
(Hymenoptera).  Annales  Historico-Naturales  Musei  Nationalis  Hugarici  69:261-296. 

Tsuneki,  K.  1990.  Description  of  two  new  subgenera,  six  new  species  and  one  unrecorded  female 
of  the  Sphecidae  from  the  island  of  Okinawa,  the  Ryukyus  (Hymenoptera).  Special  Publications 
of  the  Japan  Hymenopterists  Association  36:81-99. 

Yeo,  P.  F.  and  S.  A.  Corbet.  1983.  Solitary  wasps.  Naturalists'  Handbooks,  3.  Cambridge  Univer- 
sity Press.  Cambridge,  England,  United  Kingdom.  65  pp. 


162  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


NOT  KNOWING  IS  GNAWING  AT  ME 

Frederick  B.  Getze1 

It's  important  when  speaking  of  animals,  that 

you  know  what's  what  and  what's  "knat" 

for,  the  spelling  of  pests,  the  "G"  use 

Which,  even  for  gnus,  is  not  news. 

So,  lest  spell-checkers  make  sounds  like  "blagnat" 

Please,  be  sure  of  the  first  letter  of  "Gnat." 


Branch  Libraries  Department,  Agriculture  Library,  025  Townsend  Hall,  University  of  Delaware, 
Newark,  Delaware  19717-1303  U.S.A.  E-mail:  fritzg(«mdel.edu. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 163 

A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  OXYCERA  MEIGEN 
(DIPTERA:  STRATIOMYIDAE)  FROM  TURKEY1 

Turgay  Ustiiner  and  Abdullah  HasbenlP 

ABSTRACT:  A  new  species,  Oxycera  turcica  sp.n.,  is  described  from  Turkey  and  its  diagnostic 
characters  are  illustrated.  It  is  compared  with  two  related  species  described  by  E.  Lindner  from  Israel. 

KEY  WORDS:  Diptera,  Stratiomyidae,  Oxycera  turcica,  new  species,  Turkey 

Up  to  the  present,  only  five  species  of  Oxycera  Meigen  have  been  recorded 
from  Turkey  (Woodley  2001):  Oxycera  insolata  Kiihbander,  1984;  O.  limbata 
Loew,  1862;  O.  meigenii  Staeger,  1844;  O.  pygmaea  (Fallen,  1917)  and  O.  tri- 
lineata  (Linnaeus,  1767).  During  our  investigations  of  the  Turkish  stratiomyid 
fauna,  we  discovered  a  species  which  apparently  represents  an  interesting  con- 
tribution to  the  native  Oxycera  list.  It  appeared  to  be  a  new  species  distinctly  dif- 
fering from  the  related  species  described  by  Lindner  from  Israel,  viz.  Oxycera 
galeata  Lindner,  1975  and  Oxycera  orientalis  Lindner,  1974. 

Oxycera  turcica  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-18) 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  1  male:  Turkey:  Sivas,  Sarkisla,  Karacaoren  Village,  elev.  1710  m,  June 
23,  2003,  coll.  Ustiiner,  deposited  in  Selcuk  University  Department  of  Biology  in  Konya  (coll.  Ustiin- 
er) in  Turkey.  Allotype:  1  female:  Turkey:  Sivas,  Sarkisla,  Karacaoren  Village,  elev.  1710  m,  June 
23,  2003,  coll.  Ustiiner,  deposited  in  Selcuk  University  Department  of  Biology  in  Konya  (coll.  Ustiin- 
er)  in  Turkey.  2  male:  Turkey:  Sivas,  Sarkisla,  Karacaoren  Village,  elev.  1710m,  June  23,  2003,  coll. 
Ustiiner.  3  female:  Turkey:  Sivas,  Sarkisla,  Karacaoren  Village,  elev.  1710  m,  June  23,  2003,  coll. 
Ustiiner.  2  male:  Turkey:  Sivas,  Giiriin,  from  Giiriin  to  Sivas  5.  km.,  elev.  1550  m,  July  26,  2003,  coll. 
Ustiiner.  4  female:  Turkey:  Sivas,  Giirun,  from  Giiriin  to  Sivas  5.  km.,  elev.  1550  m,  July  26,  2003, 
coll.  Ustuner.  1  male:  Turkey:  Kayseri,  Yahyaly,  Burhaniye  Village  (35°  35'  E  ;  37°  49'  N),  elev.  1414 
m,  June  23,  2002,  coll.  Ustuner&Hasbenli.  1  female:  Turkey:  Kayseri,  Sanz,  Incemagara  Village  (36° 
26'  E  ;  38°  22'  N),  elev.  1518m,  June  14,  2002,  coll.  Ustuner&Hasbenli.  2  male:  Turkey:  Kayseri, 
Yahyaly,  Burhaniye  Village  (35°  35'  E  ;  37°  49'  N),  elev.  1414  m,  July  13,  2002,  coll.  Ustuner& 
Hasbenli.  1  female:  Turkey:  Kayseri,  Yahyaly,  Burhaniye  Village  (35°  35'  E  ;  37°  49'  N),  elev.  1414 
m,  July  13,  2002,  coll.  Ustiiner&Hasbenli.  1  female:  Turkey:  Kayseri,  Yahyaly,  Ulupynar  Plateau 
(35°  33'  E  ;  37°  53'  N),  elev.  1500  m,  July  13,  2002,  coll.  Ustuner&Hasbenli.  7  male:  Turkey:  Kayseri, 
Yahyali,  Sogulca  Plateau  (35°  24'  E  ;  38°  O1  N),  elev.  1665  m,  July  14,  2002,  coll.  Ustuner&Hasbenli 
.  5  female:  Turkey:  Kayseri,  Yahyali,  Sogulca  Plateau  (35°  24'  E  ;  38°  0'  N),  elev.  1665  m,  July  14, 
2002,  coll.  Ustuner&Hasbenli.  2  female:  Turkey:  Kayseri,  Sanz,  Bostanlik  Village  (36°  26'  E  ;  38° 
29'  N),  elev.  1700  m,  15  July  2002,  coll.  Ustuner&Hasbenli.  1  male:  Turkey:  Kayseri,  Sanz,  Sarlak 
Village  (36°  40'  E  ;  38°  39'  N),  elev.  1889  m.  July  16,  2002.  coll.  Ustuner&Hasbenli  .  1  female: 
Turkey:  Kayseri,  Sanz,  Sarlak  Village  (36°  40'  E  ;  38°  39'  N)  elev.  1889  m,  July  16.  2002,  coll. 
Ustiiner&Hasbenli.  1  male:  Turkey:  Kayseri,  Sari/,  Karapynar  Village  (36°  35'  E  ;  38°  35'  N). 


1  Received  on  July  12,  2004.  Accepted  on  August  3,  2004. 

;  Selcuk  University,  Faculty  of  Arts  and  Science,  Department  of  Biology,  Kampiis,  4203 1  Konya, 
Turkey.  E-mail:  tustuner@selcuk.edu.tr. 

1  Gazi  University,  Faculty  of  Arts  and  Science.  Department  of  Biology,  06500  Teknikokullar.  Ankara, 
Turkey.  E-mail:  hasbenli@gazi.edu.tr. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


164  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


elev.  1723  m,  July  16,  2002,  coll.  Ustiiner&Hasbenli.  4  female:  Turkey:  Kayseri,  Sanz,  Karapynar 
Village  (36°  35'  E  ;  38°  35'  N),  elev.  1723  m,  July  16,  2002,  coll.  Ustiiner&Hasbenli.  1  female: 
Turkey:  Burdur.  Aglasun,  Yesilbas  Village  environment  (30°  27'  E  ;  37°  39'  N)  elev.  140  m,  July  15, 
2000  coll.Ostiiner  &  Hasbenli;  1  female  Turkey:  Konya,  Bozkir,  Yoloren  Village,  elev.  1 100m,  July 
5,  2001,  coll.  Ustiiner.  The  paratype  specimens  are  deposited  in  the  collection  of  the  Zoological 
Museum  of  the  Gazi  University  (ZMGU),  Ankara  (coll.  Hasbenli)  and  Selcuk  University  Department 
of  Biology  in  Konya  (coll.  Ustiiner)  in  Turkey.  The  type  specimens  were  captured  basking  on  Salix 
sp.  and  in  a  grassy  area  along  a  stream. 

Male:  Head  (Figs.  1  and  2)  hemispherical,  slightly  broader  than  thorax  in  dorsal  view.  Eyes  con- 
tiguous, only  very  short  and  sparsely  haired,  facets  on  lower  third  of  eyes  considerably  smaller,  con- 
trast border  between  larger  and  smaller  facets  very  distinct.  Triangular  frons  above  antennae  slightly 
covered  with  velvet-like,  silvery-white  pubescence,  leaving  only  upper  angle  and  narrow  median 
groove  bare  and  shining  black.  Face  shining  black  with  sparse  pile.  Fine  powder-like,  yellowish 
white  stripe  along  inner  margin  of  each  eye.  Postocular  area  swollen  in  lower  half  of  head,  shining 
black,  with  long,  dense  and  white  hairs.  Scape  and  pedicel  pale  brown,  flagellum  black,  last  flagel- 
lomere  slender  but  hardly  longer  than  the  rest  of  flagellum.  Labella  of  proboscis  light  brown. 

Thorax  (Figs.  3  and  4)  shining  black  with  long,  white  hairs.  Postpronotal  calli,  subnotopleural 
stripe  and  postalar  calli  yellow.  Yellow  and  anteriorly  pointed  spot  on  postalar  callus  often  reaching 
about  half  distance  to  transverse  suture  or  slightly  shorter.  Scutellum  including  spines  yellow,  only 
base  (or  basal  2/3)  of  scutellum  black.  Thoracic  pile  white,  dense  and  erect  on  lateral  parts  of  scutum 
and  rather  longer  on  pleura.  R4  absent.  Legs  mainly  yellow  but  exterior  surface  of  fore  femur  with  a 
black  stripe-like  spot,  middle  and  hind  femora  with  a  black  ring-like  spot  in  middle.  Hind  tibia  black 
with  a  yellow  ring  in  middle.  All  tarsi  yellow  but  tarsomere  2  and  3  dark  brown  on  dorsal  surface. 

Abdomen  (Fig.  5)  shining  black,  with  a  yellow  lateral  margin  beginning  at  posterior  corner  of  ter- 
gite  2,  extending  into  lateral  markings  on  tergites  3  and  4.  Tergite  5  with  a  yellow  apical  spot.  Venter 
entirely  black. 

Male  terminalia  (Figs.  6,  7  and  8):  Epandrium  relatively  narrow,  semicircular,  about  half  as  high 
as  proctiger.  Proctiger  subtriangular,  cerci  elongate  oval,  narrowed  proximally.  Gonostylus  suboval, 
pointed  distally,  innercurved.  Aedeagal  complex  relatively  short  and  massive,  tripartite  in  distal  half. 

Length:  body  5.0-6.0  mm.,  wing  4.5  mm. 

Female:  Eyes  at  most  with  very  inconspicuous  and  sparse  short  hairs.  Frons  (Fig.  10)  shining 
black,  about  1/3  as  broad  as  head  width,  brownish  above  bases  of  antennae.  Two  small,  white,  almost 
round  spots  present  at  each  side  of  frons  at  eye  margin.  Cerebrate  (Fig.  11)  (medial  part  of  occiput) 
with  a  striking,  semicircular  yellow  spot,  rest  of  occiput  black.  Postocular  band  (Fig.  9)  black,  broad, 
approximately  as  wide  as  both  basal  antennal  segments  combined  are  long.  Postocular  area  covered 
with  sparse,  short,  white  pile  in  upper  half  of  head  but  with  dense,  long,  white  pile  in  lower  half. 
Scape  and  pedicel  yellowish  brown,  flagellum  black,  last  flagellomere  slender  but  hardly  longer  than 
rest  of  flagellum.  Face  black  with  sparse  white  hairs.  Labella  of  proboscis  pale  brown  with  sparse, 
long,  whitish  hairs. 

Thorax  (Fig.  12)  shining  black.  Postpronotal  callus  (Fig.  13)  with  a  round  yellow  spot,  yellow 
subnotopleural  stripe  extended  at  wing-base.  Postalar  callus  with  large  yellow  spot,  this  spot  pointed 
anteriorly  and  almost  reaching  tranverse  suture.  Scutellum  and  scutellar  spines  yellow.  Thoracic  pile 
consisting  of  white,  dense  and  erect  hairs  on  margin  of  scutum,  and  relatively  long  hairs  on  pleura. 
Wings  (Fig.  15)  transparent,  veins  yellow,  R4  absent.  Halteres  yellow  with  darkened  stalk.  Legs 
mainly  yellow,  fore  and  mid  tibia  yellow,  hind  tibiae  black  with  a  yellow  ring  in  middle.  Tarsi  chiefly 
yellow  but  tarsomeres  3  and  4  pale  brown  on  outer  surface. 

Abdomen  (Fig.  14)  shining  black,  with  a  yellow  lateral  margin  beginning  at  posterior  corner  of 
tergite  2,  and  with  rather  broad  and  yellow  sidemarkings  on  tergites  3  and  4.  Tergite  5  with  a  yellow 
apical  spot  or  medianly  broadened  yellow  margin.  Venter  entirely  black. 

Female  terminalia  (Figs.  16  and  17):  Proctiger  subtriangular,  epiproct  narrowed  in  distal  half. 
Cerci  bisegmcnted:  basal  segment  about  twice  as  long  as  broad,  narrowed  proximally,  apical  segment 
slightly  shorter  than  twice  as  long  as  broad,  both  segments  with  long  setae.  Genital  furca  (=  sternite 
9)  relatively  narrow  and  elongate,  markedly  tapered  towards  distal  part.  Medial  aperture  subcircular 
but  almost  straight  posteriorly.  Posterolateral  projections  slender  and  long,  4-5  times  longer  than 
broad  in  middle. 

Length:  body  6.0  mm,  wing  4.0-4.5  mm. 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 


165 


1 


4 


8 


Figs.  1-8  Oxycera  turcica  n.  sp.  male.  1:  Head  in  lateral  view;  2:  Head  in  frontal  view; 
3:  Thorax  in  dorsal  view;  4:  Thorax  in  lateral  view;  5:  Abdomen  in  dorsal  view.  Scale  bar 
=  1mm.;  male  genitalia.  6-7:  dorsal  and  ventral  parts  of  male  genitalia;  8:  aedeagal  com- 
plex in  dorsal  view.  Scale  bar  =  0.25  mm. 


166 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


13 


15 


16 


Fig.  9-17  Oxycera  turcica  n.  sp.  female.  9:  Head  in  lateral  view;  10:  Head  in  frontal 
view;  11:  Head  in  dorsal  view;  12:  Thorax  in  dorsal  view;  13:  Thorax  in  lateral  view; 
14:  Abdomen  in  dorsal  view;  Scale  bar  =  1  mm;  15:  Wing.  Scale  bar  =  1mm;  female  gen- 
italia;  16:  Female  terminalia  in  dorsal  view;  17:  genital  furca.  Scale  bar  =  0.25  mm. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 167 


DISCUSSION 

The  striking  yellow  semicircular  spot  beyond  ocellar  triangle  in  the  female  is 
very  characteristic  as  well  as  anteriorly  extended  postalar  spots.  A  similar  cere- 
bral yellow  spot  was  figured  by  Lindner  (1975)  in  his  description  of  Oxycera 
galeata  (as  Heraclina  galeata)  based  on  the  female  holotype  and  a  female  para- 
type  from  Israel.  However,  this  spot  is  apparently  much  higher  and  nearly  trian- 
gular in  O.  galeata.  Moreover,  this  species  is  well  characterized  by  a  large  and 
conspicuous,  subquadrate  yellow  midspot  between  the  transverse  suture  and  the 
scutellum. 

Another  species  described  also  by  Lindner  (1974)  from  Israel  is  Oxycera  ori- 
entalis.  Also  this  species  is  based  on  the  female  holotype  (and  one  male  and  one 
female  paratype)  from  Israel.  According  to  the  original  description,  the  female 
head  of  0.  orientalis  shows  a  very  different  yellow  pattern  compared  with  O.  tur- 
cica  sp.n.  The  cerebral  spot  is  absent  and  the  yellow  frontal  and  postocular 
stripes  are  developed  in  addition  to  the  paired  frontal  and  upper  postocular  spots. 
The  yellow  frontal  stripe  begins  on  each  side  below  the  middle  of  the  frons  at  the 
eye  margin  and  continues  slightly  wider  on  the  face,  where  it  is  covered  with 
long  white  hairs. 

Both  Lindner's  species  under  discussion  were  originally  described  in  the 
genus  Heraclina  Lindner,  1938,  separated  on  the  largely  variable  character,  pres- 
ence or  absence  of  vein  R4.  Rozkosny  (1983)  and  Rozkosny  &  Baez  (1983)  con- 
sidered this  genus  to  be  a  mere  synonym  of  Oxycera  Meigen,  1803,  and  this 
opinion  was  accepted  by  Woodley  (2001). 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

Our  thanks  are  due  to  Prof.  R.  Rozkosny  (Brno,  Czech  Republic)  for  critically  reviewing  the  man- 
uscript. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Kiihbandner,  M.  1984.  Eine  neue  Oxycera-  Art  aus  der  Sudostturkei  (Diptera,  Stratiomyidae). 
Entomofauna  -  Zeitschrift  fur  Entomologie  5(34):  471-480. 

Lindner,  E.  1974.  On  the  Stratiomyidae  (Diptera)  of  the  Near  East.  Israel  Journal  of  Entomology 
9:  93-108. 

Lindner,  E.  1975.  On  some  Stratiomyidae  (Diptera)  from  the  Near  East.  Israel  Journal  of  Ento- 
mology 10:  41-49. 

Rozkosny,  R.  1983.  A  biosystematic  study  of  the  European  Stratiomyidae  (Diptera).  Vol.  2.-  Clitel- 
lariinae,  Hermetiinae,  Pachygasterinae  and  Bibliography.  Dr.  W.  Junk,  The  Hague.  The  Nether- 
lands. 431  pp. 

Ro/kosny,  R.  and  M.  Baez.  1983.  The  Stratiomyidae  of  the  Canary  Islands,  including  a  descrip- 
tion of  a  new  species  of  Zabrachia  Coquillett  (Diptera).  Vieraea  12:  75-94. 

Woodley,  N.  E.  2001.  A  world  catalog  of  the  Stratiomyidae  (Insecta:  Diptera).  Backhuys  Pub- 
lishers. Leiden,  The  Netherlands.  473  pp. 


168  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

AN  OVERLOOKED  FAMILY-GROUP  NAME  FOR 
TERMITES  (ISOPTERA)1 

Michael  S.  Engel2  and  Kumar  Krishna3 

During  ongoing  work  to  complete  a  new,  annotated  world  catalog  of  the  termites 
(Isoptera),  a  family-group  name  was  found  that  had  been  inadvertently  overlooked 
during  the  preparation  of  an  account  of  such  names  (Engel  and  Krishna,  2004).  The 
name  Odontotermitini  was  proposed  as  a  tribe  by  Weidner  (1956)  for  Odontotermes, 
Ancistrotermes,  and  Microtermes.  Odontotermitini  was  not  used  by  subsequent 
authors  of  termite  classification.  We  provide  here  an  entry  for  Odontotermitini,  indi- 
cating the  same  information  as  provided  for  other  termite  family-group  names  (Engel 
and  Krishna,  2004),  and  putting  the  name  on  record  as  an  amendment  to  the  earlier 
paper.  Since  the  names  provided  in  the  earlier  account  are  listed  in  order  by  taxo- 
nomic  priority,  Odontotermitini  should  be  intercalated  between  the  names  Apicoter- 
mitinae  and  Cubitermitini.  The  entry  would  read  as  follows: 

28a.  Odontotermitini  Weidner,  1956:  82.  Type  genus:  Odontotermes  Holmgren, 
1910.  Combining  stem:  Odontotermit-. 

In  the  table  summarizing  the  hierarchical  outline  of  termite  classification  (Engel 
and  Krishna,  2004),  Odontotermitini  would  be  listed  as  a  synonym  of  Macrotermi- 
tinae,  immediately  under  Acanthotermitinae,  itself  a  synonym  (vide  Engel  and  Krish- 
na, 2001;  ICZN,  2003)  as  all  three  were  proposed  for  groups  of  fungus-growing  ter- 
mites. Odontotermitini  does  not  affect  the  priority  or  status  of  any  other  family-group 
names. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  are  grateful  to  V.  Krishna  and  an  anonymous  reviewer  for  constructive  comments  on  this  note.  This 
is  contribution  3409  of  the  Division  of  Entomology,  Natural  History  Museum,  University  of  Kansas. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Engel,  M.  S.  and  K.  Krishna.  2001.  Macrotermitinae  Kemner,  1934  (Insecta,  Isoptera):  Proposed  prece- 
dence over  Acanthotermitinae  Sjostedt,  1926.  Bulletin  of  Zoological  Nomenclature  58(3):  206-209. 

Engel,  M.  S.  and  K.  Krishna.  2004.  Family-group  names  for  termites  (Isoptera).  American  Museum 
Novitates  3432:  1-9. 

Holmgren,  N.  1910.  Das  System  der  Termiten.  Zoologischer  Anzeiger  35:  284-286. 

International  Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature.  2003.  Opinion  2038:  Macrotermitinae  Kem- 
ner, 1934  (Insecta,  Isoptera):  Given  precedence  over  Acanthotermitinae  Sjostedt,  1926.  Bulletin  of 
Zoological  Nomenclature  60(2):  162-163. 

Weidner,  H.  1956.  Beitrage  zur  Kenntnis  der  Tenniten  Angolas,  hauptsachlich  auf  Grund  der  Samm- 
lungen  und  Beobachtungen  von  A.  de  Barros  Machado  (I.  Beitrag).  Publicacoes  Culturais  da  Com- 
panhia  de  Diamantes  de  Angola  29:  55-106. 


1  Received  on  December  7,  2004.  Accepted  on  December  18,  2004. 

2  Division  of  Entomology,  Natural  History  Museum,  and  Department  of  Ecology  &  Evolutionary  Biology, 
1460  Jayhawk  Boulevard,  Snow  Hall,  University  of  Kansas,  Lawrence,  Kansas  66045-7523,  U.S.A. 
E-mail:  msengel@ku.edu. 

'  Division  of  Invertebrate  Zoology,  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Central  Park  West  at  79th  Street, 
New  York,  New  York  10024-5192  U.S.A.  E-mail:  krishn@amnh.org. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

ON  THE  IDENTITY  OF  HALICTUS  CUBENSIS  SPINOLA, 
1851  (HYMENOPTERA:  HALICTIDAE)1 

Michael  S.  Engcl2 

Some  time  ago  Dr.  Julio  A.  Genaro  inquired  if  I  might  be  able  to  determine 
the  proper  identity  of  the  species  known  as  Halictus  cubensis  Spinola,  1851 
which  was  described  from  a  male  and  female  from  Havana,  Cuba.  Unfortunate- 
ly, Spinola  (1851,  p.  203)  only  mentioned  the  species  in  passing,  proposing  it 
rather  cavalierly  as  a  note  under  his  treatment  of//,  chloris  Spinola,  1851  (today 
Corynura  chloris}  and  principally  referring  to  the  position  of  particular  wing 
veins.  Thus,  although  the  name  was  made  available,  the  real  identity  of  the 
species  has  remained  undetermined  for  over  150  years.  Indeed,  in  the  catalog  of 
Western  Hemisphere  halictids,  Moure  and  Hurd  (1987,  p.  206)  rightly  left 
H.  cubensis  as  Halictini  incertae  sedis. 

Through  the  kindness  of  Dr.  Guido  Pagliano  I  have  recently  had  the  opportu- 
nity to  examine  the  male  and  female  upon  which  Spinola  based  his  brief  descrip- 
tion of//,  cubensis.  I  have  found  that  the  female  is  a  specimen  of  Augochlora 
regina  Smith,  1853  (Augochlorini:  Augochlorina),  while  the  male  isAgaposmon 
viridulus  (Fabricius,  1793)  (Caenohalictini:  Agapostemonina).  Both  species  are 
already  relatively  well  characterized  and  I  therefore  do  not  believe  it  necessary 
to  provide  lengthy  redescriptions  of  them  herein.  However,  for  the  purpose  of 
nomenclatorial  stability  I  have  provided  the  necessary  taxonomic  summaries  for 
both  species,  designated  a  lectotype  for  H.  cubensis,  and  indicated  the  necessary 
new  synonymy  that  the  lectotype  designation  precipitates  (infra).  Both  of 
Spinola's  specimens  are  now  labeled  with  their  appropriate  identities  and  the 
male  with  a  lectotype  label  as  indicated. 

SYSTEMATIC  ENTOMOLOGY 

Tribe  Augochlorini  Beebe 

Genus  Augochlora  Smith 

Augochlora  (Augochlora)  regina  Smith 

Augochlora  regina  Smith,  1853:  77. 

Material.  Female;  [Havana,  Cuba;  coll.  Poey]  [Halictus  cuhensis  Spinola]  Augochlora  regi- 
na Smith,  del.  M.  S.  Engcl,  2004.  Specimen  conserved  in  the  Spinola  Collection  of  the  Museo 
Rcgionale  di  Scienze  Naturali,  Turin. 


1  Received  on  June  28,  2004.  Accepted  on  November  29,  2004. 

:  Division  of  Hntomology.  Natural  History  Museum,  and  Department  of  Ecology  &  Evolutionary 
Biology,  1460  Jayhawk  Boulevard,  Snow  Hall,  University  of  Kansas.  Lawrence,  Kansas  66045- 
7523  U.S.A.  E-mail:  msengel(«ku.edu. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


170  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Tribe  Caenohalictini  Michener 

Genus  Agapostemon  Guerin-Meneville 

Agapostemon  (Agapostemon)  viridulm  (Fabricius) 

Apis  viridula  Fabricius,  1793:  342. 

Andrena  (Agapostemon)  femoralis  Guerin-Meneville,  1844:  447. 
Halictus  cubensis  Spinola,  1851:  203.  new  synonym 
Agapostemon  semiviridis  Cresson,  1865:  172. 

Lectotype  (here  designated).  Male;  [Havana,  Cuba;  coll.  Poey]  //  [Halictus  cubensis  Spinola]  // 
Lectotype,  Halictus  cubensis  Spinola,  1851,  desig.  M.  S.  Engel  [red  label]  //  Agapostemon  viridulus 
(Fabricius),  del.  M.  S.  Engel,  2004.  Specimen  conserved  in  the  Spinola  Collection  of  the  Museo 
Regionale  di  Scienze  Naturali,  Turin.  The  lectotype  is  here  designated  for  the  express  purpose  of  stabi- 
lizing the  application  of  the  epithet  cubensis  as  proposed  by  Spinola  (op.  cit.).  The  specimen  is  in  excel- 
lent condition. 

Comments.  Although  I  could  have  selected  Spinola's  female  as  the  lectotype, 
A.  regina  has  been  more  widely  used  in  the  literature,  albeit  still  rather  uncom- 
monly, than  A.  viridulus.  Furthermore,  of  these  two  names  in  current  usage  only 
A.  viridulus  is  older  than  H.  cubensis.  Selection  of  the  male  as  the  name-bearing 
type  for  the  latter  renders  the  epithet  a  junior  synonym  of  the  former,  preserving 
current  usage  and  eliminating  the  long  unused  name.  Since  Spinola's  description 
applies  equally  to  his  male  and  female  specimens  and  he  refers  to  both,  either  is  eli- 
gible to  serve  as  the  name-bearing  type  of  H.  cubensis.  I  believe  my  selection  does 
the  most  to  promote  nomenclatorial  stability. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  am  indebted  to  Dr.  Guido  Pagliano  (Turin,  Italy)  for  kindly  preparing  the  loan  of  Spinola's  type 
material  and  for  his  patience  during  my  study  of  the  specimens.  I  am  also  grateful  to  Dr.  Julio  A.  Genaro 
(presently  of  Toronto,  Canada)  for  drawing  my  attention  to  the  little  mystery  surrounding  the  identity  of 
H.  cubensis  and  to  Dr.  Charles  D.  Michener  and  an  anonymous  reviewer  for  constructive  comments. 
This  is  contribution  Nr.  3420  of  the  Division  of  Entomology,  Natural  History  Museum  and  Biodiversity 
Research  Center,  University  of  Kansas. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Cresson,  E.  T.  1865.  On  the  Hymenoptera  of  Cuba.  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of 
Philadelphia  4:  1-200. 

Fabricius,  J.  C.  1793.  Entomologia  Systematica  Emendata  et  Aucta:  Secundum  Classes,  Ordines, 
Genera,  Species  adjectis  Synonymis,  Locis,  Observationibus,  Descriptionibus  [volume  2].  Proft; 
Hafniae  [Copenhagen],  Denmark,  viii+519  pp. 

Guerin-Meneville,  F.-E.  1844.  Iconographie  du  Regne  Animal  de  G.  Cuvier;  ou.  Representation 
d'apres  Nature  de  Fune  des  Especes  les  plus  Remarquables,  et  Souvent  non  encore  Figurees,  de 
Chaque  Genre  d'Animaux:  Avec  un  Texte  Descriptif  mis  au  Courant  de  la  Science:  Ouvrage 
Pouvant  servir  d'Atlas  a  tous  les  Traites  de  Zoologie  [tome  3:  Texte  explicatif].  Bailliere.  Paris, 
France.  576  pp. 

Moure,  J.  S.  and  P.  D.  Hurd,  Jr.  1987.  An  Annotated  Catalog  of  the  Halictid  Bees  of  the  Western 
Hemisphere  (Hymenoptera:  Halictidae).  Smithsonian  Institution  Press.  Washington,  District  of 
Columbia,  U.S.A.  vii+405  pp. 

Smith,  F.  1853.  Catalogue  of  Hymenopterous  Insects  in  the  Collection  of  the  British  Museum:  Part  I, 
Andrenidae  and  Apidae.  Trustees  of  the  British  Museum.  London,  United  Kingdom.  iii+[l]-197  pp., 
pis.  I-VI. 

Spinola,  M.  1851.  Hymenopteros.  pp.  153-569.  In,  Gay,  C.  (Editor).  Historia  Fisica  y  Politica  de 
Chile,  Zoologia  [voliimen  6].  Maulde  et  Renou.  Paris,  France.  596+[2]  pp. 


Vol.  115.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 171 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

TWO  NEW  ORTHOPTERAN  HOSTS  OF  NORTH 
AMERICAN  POLIDEINI  (DIPTERA:  TACHINIDAE)1 

James  E.  O'Hara2  and  David  A.  Gray' 

The  Polideini  are  a  moderately  sized  tribe  in  the  subfamily  Tachininae  with  36 
genera  and  about  140  described  species  (O'Hara  2002).  All  but  a  few  of  the  spec- 
ies are  restricted  to  the  New  World.  The  tribe  was  redefined  and  the  genera  and 
species  of  America  north  of  Mexico  were  revised  by  O'Hara  (2002).  In  that 
work,  all  known  hosts  of  the  polideine  species  of  America  north  of  Mexico  were 
listed  and  they  include  the  greatest  range  of  arthropod  taxa  of  any  tribe  in  the 
Tachinidae:  various  Lepidoptera,  Hymenoptera  (Diprionidae),  Orthoptera  (Gryl- 
lidae  and  Raphidophoridae),  Blattaria  (Blattellidae),  Chilopoda  (IGeophilus  sp.), 
Scorpiones  (Vaejovidae),  and  Araneae  (Antrodiaetidae)  (O'Hara  2002).  Two  new 
orthopteran  hosts  of  North  American  Polideini  were  recently  discovered  by  the 
junior  author  and  are  reported  here.  These  new  records  are  particularly  notewor- 
thy because  orthopteran  hosts  of  Tachinidae  are  not  as  well  known  as  hosts  in  the 
major  orders  attacked,  Lepidoptera,  Coleoptera,  Hymenoptera  (Symphyta),  and 
Hemiptera. 

Dichocera  lyrata  Williston 

Sixteen  specimens  of  Pristoceuthophilus  marmoratus  Rehn  (Orthoptera, 
Raphidophoridae)  were  collected  by  the  junior  author  in  mid  to  late  October 
2003  from  Topanga  Canyon,  Santa  Monica  Mountains,  Los  Angeles  County, 
California,  in  an  area  of  mixed  coast  live  oak  (Quercus  agri folia  Nee)  and  grass- 
land bordering  chaparral.  The  live  crickets  were  returned  to  the  laboratory  for 
behavioral  studies.  A  single  tachinid  maggot  emerged  from  one  of  the  crickets  on 
January  7,  2004.  It  was  reared  to  an  adult  and  subsequently  identified  by  the  sen- 
ior author  as  a  male  D.  lyrata.  There  are  no  definite  host  records  for  D.  lyrata  in 
the  literature,  but  a  Dichocera  "probably  lyrata"  specimen  collected  from  Ithaca, 
New  York,  was  reportedly  reared  from  the  raphidophorid  Ceuthophilus  guttulo- 
sus  guttulosus  Walker  (Chinn  and  Arnaud  1993,  O'Hara  2002). 

Exoristoides  johnsoni  Coquillett 

Six  specimens  of  Gryllus  integer  Scudder  (Orthoptera:  Gryllidae)  were  col- 
lected by  the  junior  author  from  high  desert  near  Holbrook,  Navajo  County, 


1  Received  on  October  27,  2004.    Accepted  on  November  4,  2004. 

:  Invertebrate  Biodiversity,  Agriculture  and  Agri-Food  Canada,  960  Carling  Avenue,  Ottawa,  Ontario. 
Canada,  K1AOC6.  E-mail:  oharaj(a'agr.gc.ca. 

1  Department  of  Biology.  California  State  University  Northridge.  18111  Nordhoff  Street,  Northridge. 
CA  91330-8303  U.S.A.  E-mail:  dgray@csun.edu. 

Mailed  on  January  19.  2005 


172  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Arizona,  1590  m  (34.93°N,  110.13°W),  on  August  9,  2002.  On  the  same  day,  a 
tachinid  maggot  emerged  from  a  captured  adult  male  cricket.  The  maggot  was 
reared  to  an  adult  and  subsequently  identified  by  the  senior  author  as  a  female  E. 
johnsoni.  This  tachinid  species  has  also  been  reared  from  the  gryllids  Anuro- 
gryllus  arboreus  Walker,  Gryllus  pennsylvanicus  Burmeister  and  "Gryllus  spp." 
(O'Hara  2002). 

There  is  no  published  information  on  the  reproductive  habits  of  D.  lyrata  or 
E.  johnsoni,  but  we  can  infer  a  little  about  their  habits  from  an  examination  of 
their  female  reproductive  systems  and  by  comparison  with  related  tachinids.  A 
pinned  female  of  each  species  was  dissected  and  both  contained  a  number  of  par- 
tially and  fully  developed  first  instar  larvae;  ca.  1050  larvae  in  D.  lyrata  and 
fewer  than  100  in  E.  johnsoni.  The  reproductive  capacity  of  the  examined  E. 
johnsoni  appeared  to  be  greater  than  the  number  of  larvae  observed,  perhaps  in 
the  range  of  200,  but  certainly  far  fewer  than  the  observed  number  in  the  D.  lyra- 
ta specimen,  which  seemed  to  be  near  capacity.  This  difference  in  apparent 
fecundity  probably  means  that  the  likelihood  of  an  individual  D.  lyrata  larva  suc- 
cessfully parasitizing  a  host  is  less  than  that  of  an  E.  johnsoni  larva  by  nearly  a 
factor  of  ten.  Be  that  as  it  may,  the  larvae  of  both  species  are  of  a  motile  type 
common  within  the  Tachininae  suggesting  that  ready-to-hatch  eggs  are  deposit- 
ed on  a  substrate,  most  likely  in  response  to  host  stimuli,  and  the  first  instars 
either  actively  search  for  a  host  or  lie  in  wait  for  a  passing  host. 

The  tachinid  specimens  and  their  puparia  have  been  deposited  in  the  Canadian 
National  Collection  of  Insects,  Ottawa,  Canada.  The  series  of  P.  marmoratus 
from  which  the  parasitized  individual  originated  was  identified  by  Ted  Cohn 
(Adjunct  Curator,  Insect  Division,  University  of  Michigan,  Museum  of  Zoology, 
Ann  Arbor,  Michigan).  The  parasitized  G.  integer  was  identified  by  the  junior 
author.  The  remains  of  the  hosts  were  not  retained. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Chinn,  J.  S.  and  P.  H.  Arnaud,  Jr.  1993.  First  records  of  Dichocera  (Diptera:  Tachinidae)  reared 
from  Ceuthophilus  (Orthoptera:  Rhaphidophoridae)  hosts  in  Nevada  and  New  York.  Pan-Pacific 
Entomologist  69:  176-179. 

O'Hara,  J.  E.  2002.  Revision  of  the  Polideini  (Tachinidae)  of  America  north  of  Mexico.  Studia  dip- 
terologica.  Supplement  10,  170pp. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2004 173 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

DISTRIBUTIONAL  RECORDS  OF  CATARACTOCORIS 
(HETEROPTERA:  NAUCORIDAE)  IN  MESOAMERICA1 

Robert  W.  Sites2 

The  genus  Cataractocoris  (Heteroptera:  Naucoridae)  is  among  the  largest  of 
the  New  World  naucorids  in  body  size.  Ironically,  this  genus  is  seldom  collected, 
in  part  because  of  its  unusual  habitat  and  restricted  range.  Whereas  most  species 
of  Naucoridae  are  either  lentic,  riffle-dwelling,  or  occur  among  marginal  stream 
vegetation,  species  of  Cataractocoris  occur  in  the  film  of  water  that  sheets  down 
over  the  vertical  rock  faces  of  waterfalls  and  in  the  splash  zone  below  waterfalls 
(Usinger  1941).  They  also  can  be  found  in  turbulent,  rocky  streams  with  fast  cur- 
rent. 

Only  two  species  of  Cataractocoris  have  been  described:  C.  macrocephalus 
(Montandon)  and  C.  marginiventris  Usinger.  Both  species  are  known  only  from 
Mexico.  Specifically,  C.  macrocephalus  has  been  recorded  from  Temascaltepec 
District  and  C.  marginiventris  from  both  Temascaltepec  and  Guerrero  districts 
(Usinger  1941,  De  Carlo  1950).  Herein,  I  report  records  from  two  additional 
Mesoamerican  countries  for  C.  macrocephalus  and  from  further  northwest  in 
Mexico  for  C.  marginiventris.  Both  species  likely  are  more  widely  distributed  in 
Mexico  and  other  Mesoamerican  countries  than  currently  known,  but  more  col- 
lecting in  appropriate  habitats  is  needed  to  learn  the  extent  of  their  distributions. 
Repository  abbreviations  are  Texas  A&M  University  (TAMU);  Snow  Museum, 
University  of  Kansas  (UKSM);  and  Enns  Entomology  Museum,  University  of 
Missouri-Columbia  (UMC). 

Cataractocoris  macrocephalus  (Montandon) 

EL  SALVADOR:  La  Majadita,  CL  1257,  December  21,  1969,  J.  T.  Polhemus,  2  males  (UKSM). 
GUATEMALA:  Yepocapa,  Chimalt.,  July  1951,  H.  T.  Dalmat,  2  males,  1  female  (UKSM);  Baja 
Verapaz,  unnamed  stream,  0.3  km  S.  La  Cumbre,  June  12,  2001,  4180  ft,  W.  D.  Shepard,  1  female 
(UMC);  Baja  Verapaz,  unnamed  creek  at  Hwy  17,  ca.  3  km  S.  La  Cumbre  and  Jet  Hwy,  CA  14,  15° 
00'  34"  N,  90°  13'  51"  W,  4180  ft,  July  12,  2001,  D.  E.  Baumgardner,  1  female  (TAMU). 

Cataractocoris  marginiventris  Usinger 

MEXICO:  Jalisco,  Rio  Las  Juntas  y  los  Verranos  at  los  Verranos  waterfall,  February  18,  1999, 
L-238,  R.  W.  Sites,  7  males,  13  females,  19  nymphs  (UMC);  Jalisco,  Rio  Mismaloya  at  Mismaloya, 
February  18,  1999,  gravel/rocky  stream,  L-237,  R  W.  Sites,  5  males,  2  females  (UMC);  Jalisco,  Rio 
Tomatalan  waterfall,  Boca  de  la  Tomatalan.  February  18,  1999,  L-236,  R.  W.  Sites,  2  males,  2 
females,  7  nymphs  (UMC). 


1  Received  on  August  6,  2004.  Accepted  on  August  23,  2004. 

:  Enns  Entomology  Museum,  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Missouri  -  Columbia,  Co- 
lumbia, Missouri  65211,  U.S.A.   E-mail:  bugs(u  missouri.edu. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


174 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  thank  David  E.  Baumgardner  and  Edward  G.  Riley,  Texas  A&M  University;  James  S.  Ashe  and 
Zachary  H.  Falin,  University  of  Kansas;  William  D.  Shepard,  California  State  University-Sacramen- 
to; and  Harry  Brailovsky,  Universidad  Nacional  Autonoma  de  Mexico  for  specimen  loans,  gifts,  or 
sharing  of  data.  I  also  thank  J.  E.  McPherson  (Southern  Illinois  University)  and  Richard  Houseman 
(University  of  Missouri)  for  critical  reviews  of  this  manuscript. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

De  Carlo,  J.  A.   1950.  Generos  y  especies  de  la  subfamilia  Ambrysinae  Usinger  (Hemiptera- 
Naucoridae).  Anales  de  la  Sociedad  Cientifica  Argentina.  150(l):3-27. 

Usinger,  R.  L.   1941.  Key  to  the  subfamilies  of  Naucoridae  with  a  generic  synopsis  of  the  new  sub- 
family Ambrysinae  (Hemiptera).  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  34(1):5-16. 


Cataractocoris  macrocephalus  (Montandon)        Cataractocoris  mnrgiuiventris  Usinger 


Vol.  115,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 175 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

NEW  HOST  RECORD  FOR  UROSIGALPHUS 
MIMOSESTES  GIBSON  AND  FIRST  RECORD  OF 

U.  NEOMEXICANUS  CRAWFORD 
(HYMENOPTERA:  BRACONIDAE)  IN  MEXICO1 

Victor  Lopez-Martinez,2  J.  I.  Figueroa-De  la  Rosa,3  J.  Romero  N.,3 
J.  A.  Sanchez  G.,4  and  S.  Anaya  R.3 

Hymenopterous  wasps  are  the  principal  parasitoids  of  bruchids,  principally 
species  of  Braconidae,  Encyrtidae,  Eulophidae,  Eupelmidae,  Eurytomidae  and 
Pteromalidae.  From  the  braconid  wasps,  the  genus  Glyptocolastes  Ashmead, 
Heterospilus  Haliday,  Stenocorse  Marsh  and  Urosigalphus  Ashmead  have  a  wide 
range  of  bruchids  as  a  natural  host  (Center  and  Johnson,  1976;  Hetz  and  Johnson, 
1988;  Marsh  1979,  1997;  Steffan  1981).  High  number  of  hosts  reported  for  the 
hymenopterous  is  given  principally  for  its  "host  specificity  to  a  particular  envi- 
ronment, not  a  particular  beetle"  (Hetz  and  Johnson,  1988). 

Systematic  and  biological  hosts  associations  of  Urosigalphus  species  has  been 
published  for  Gibson  (1972a,  1972b,  1982;  Hetz  and  Johnson,  1988),  they  stat- 
ed that  19  species  are  distributed  in  Mexico.  Urosigalphus  belongs  to  the  tribe 
Brachistini  of  subfamily  Helconinae,  and  can  be  characterized  as  egg-larval  par- 
asitoid  (Sharkey,  1 996),  which  is  reported  in  a  undetermined  species  of  Vrosig- 
alphus  from  Costa  Rica  (Traveset,  1991).  According  to  Romero  (2002),  in  his 
work  about  Mexican  bruchids,  59  specimens  of  hymenopterous  wasps  that  were 
reared  from  bruchids  infesting  Fabaceae  pods  and  Convulvulaceae  seeds,  all 
belongs  to  the  braconid  genus  Urosigalphus. 

In  the  present  work  new  distribution  record  and  host  associations  data  for 
Urosigalphus  (Bruchiurosigalphus)  mimosestes  Gibson  are  given;  besides  new 
distribution  records  of  U.  (Microurosigalphus)  neomexicanus  Crawford  for  the 
country.  The  records  presented  here  are  based  on  material  principally  deposited 
in  the  Coleccion  de  Insectos  del  Centre  de  Entomologia  y  Acarologia,  Montecillo 
(CEAM);  and  some  material  borrowed  from  Texas  A&M  University,  College 
Station  (TAMU)  entomological  collection. 


1  Received  on  July  11,  2002.  Accepted  on  July  19,  2004. 

-  Facultad  dc  Ciencias  Agropecuarias,  Universidad  Autonoma  del  Estado  de  Morelos,  Avenida 
Universidad  1001,  Colonia  Chamilpa,  Cuernavaca,  Morelos,  C.  P.  62210,  Mexico.  E-mail: 
vilomar74fo^yahoo.com.mx. 

'  Taxonomia  de  Insectos,  Institute  de  Fitosanidad,  Colegio  de  Postgraduados,  km  36.5  carr.  Mexico- 
Texcoco,  Montecillo,  Edo.  de  Mexico,  C.  P.  56230,  Mexico.  E-mail:  fisaac(a>colpos.mx. 

4Unidad  de  Control  Biologico,  CIIDIR-IPN-Unidad  Oaxaca,  Hornos  1003,  Santa  Cruz  Xoxocotlan, 
Oaxaca,  C.  P.  71230,  Mexico.  E-mail:  asanchezfo/colpos.mx. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


176 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Subfamily  Helconinae 
Urosigalphus  (Bruchiurosigalphm)  mimosestes 

The  hypothesis  of  the  host  specificity  to  a  particular  enviroment  of  Hetz  and 
Johnson  (1988)  can  be  partially  corroborated  with  this  work.  Urosigalphus 
mimosestes  has  the  capacity  of  attacking  at  least  five  species  of  bruchids  associat- 
ed to  four  host  plants  (Table  1 ),  and  probably  have  a  wider  host  range. 

This  species  has  been  reported  from  the  Mexican  states  of  Distrito  Federal  and 
Morelos  (Gibson,  1972b;  Figueroa  and  Romero,  2002),  but  now  are  reported  from 
six  Mexican  states  (Durango,  Guanajuato,  Hidalgo,  Morelos,  Nayarit,  and  Puebla) 
expanding  the  distribution  of  the  species  across  the  country. 


Host  plant 

Bruchid  host 

Country 

Reference 

Not  reported 

Mimosestes  nubigens 
(Motschulsky) 

Honduras 

Gibson 

(1972b) 

Lonchocarpus  rugosus 

Ctenocolum  janzeni  Kingsolver 

Mexico 

Figueroa  and  Romero 
(2002) 

Acacia  farmesiana, 
A.  schaffneri 

M.  nubigens 

Mexico 

New  host  plants 
records 

Ipomoea  simulans 

Megacerus  callirhipis  (Sharp) 

Mexico 

New  host 
record 

Prosopis  juliflora 

Algarobius  johnsoni  Kingsolver, 
Mimosestes  amicus  (Horn) 

Mexico 

New  host 
record 

Table  1.  Host  records  and  distribution  of  Urosigalphus  (B.)  mimosestes  in  Mexico. 

Material  Examined:  MEXICO.  DURANGO:  1  9,  Vicente  Guerrero,  San  Francisco  Javier,  2 1 -XII- 
1995,  col.  J.  Romero  N.,  reared  seed  Prosopis  /uliJJora,  parasitoide  del  bruquido  Algarobius  johnsoni 
Kingsolver.  GUANAJUATO:  1  Cf,  Irapuato,  El  Copal,  18-VIII-1994,  Salas  A.  D.,  reared  seed  Prosopis 
sp.,  parasitoide  del  bruquido  Algarobius  johnsoni  Kingsolver;  1  9  and  1  9-  same  data  but  21 -VII- 1994, 
Salas  A.  D.;  3  9  and  3  Cf ,  same  data  but  22-VIII-1994;  2  9  and  2  Cf,  same  data  but  1 7-IX- 1994,  Arevalo 
A;  4  9  and  1  Cf,  km  3  carr.  San  Jose  Iturbide-Victoria,  2-VIII-1996,  col.  J.  Romero  N.,  Acacia  schaffneri 
(S.  Watson)  F.  J.  Herm,  parasitoide  del  bruquido  Mimosestes  nubigens  (Motschulsky);  1  9  and  1  Cf,  San 
LuisdelaPaz,  1 1 -IV- 1996,  Jose  A.  Sanchez  G;  1  9,  Yiustis,  10-XII-1995,  Jose  A.  Sanchez  G.  HIDAL- 
GO: 4  9  and  7  Cf,  3  mill.  N  Las  Trancas,  Parque  Nacional  Los  Marmoles,  20-VII-1999,  6250  msnm,  col. 
J.  Romero  N.,  reared  seed  JRN#240/99  Acacia  farmesiana  (L.),  parasitoide  del  bruquido  Mimosestes 
nubigens  (Motschulsky);  3  9  and  4  Cf,  Zindejeb,  Tasquillo,  20-VII-1999,  1830  msnm,  col.  J.  Romero  N.. 
reared  seed  JRN#239/799  Prosopis  juliflora,  parasitoide  del  biiiquido  Mimosestes  amicus  (Horn),  20°  33' 
04"  N  99°  17'  44"  W.  MORELOS:  1  9,  Tlalquitenango,  La  Mezquitera,  2-II-1997,  903  msnm,  col.  J. 
Romero  N.,  reared  seed  JRN#201/97  Prosopis  juliflora,  parasitoide  del  bruquido  Algarobius  johnsoni 
Kingsolver.  NAYARIT:  1  Cf,  15  mi.  SE  Tepic,  2-III-1973,  ca.  4000,  C.  D.  Johnson  collector,  reared  seed 
CDJ#303/73  Ipomoea  simulans,  emerged  by  25-IX-1973,  parasitoide  del  bruquido  Megacerus  callirhip- 
is (Sharp).  PUEBLA:  1  9,  6  km  SW  Acatepec,  17-VII-1996,  1900  msnm,  Jesus  Romero  N. 

Urosigalphus  (Microurosigalphus)  neomexicanus  Crawford 

At  this  time,  no  biological  data  has  been  published  of  this  species,  but  this  reports 
an  increasing  number  of  Urosigalphus  in  Mexico  (19  to  20).  This  records  are  based 
upon  17  specimens  examined,  extending  the  distribution  of  the  braconid  to  the  Mex- 
ican states  of  Guerrero,  Oaxaca  and  Puebla.  Oaxaca  represents  its  southernmost 
record. 


Vol.  115.  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 1_T 

This  species  was  originally  described  from  New  Mexico,  USA  (Crawford,  1914). 
These  have  since  been  recorded  from  Arizona,  Colorado,  Illinois,  Iowa,  Kansas, 
Missouri,  and  Texas  (Martin,  1956;  Gibson,  1972a;  Whitfield  and  Lewis,  2001). 
Future  additional  collections  will  help  determine  host  and  plant  relations. 

Material  Examined:  MEXICO.  GUERRERO:  1  Cf.  15  mi.  W.  Chichihualco,  15-VII-1984,  Elev. 
Aprox.  1500',  J.  B.  Woolley;  1  tf.  5.4  mi.  Southwest  La  Laguna.  14-VII-1985,  Jones  &  Schaffner;  1  9  and 
12  Cf  6.2  mi  SW  Xochipala,  8-VII-1982,  5670  ft,  R.  Wharton.  OAXACA:  1  Cf,  3  mi.  se.  Matatlan 
(Microondas  road),  17-VII-1987,  elev.  6650  ft.,  Kovarik  &  Schaffner.  PUEBLA:  1  9,  6  km  SW  Acatepec, 
17-VII-1996,  1900  m,  Jesus  Romero  N. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  Robert  A.  Wharton  for  the  loan  of  TAMU  specimens.  Rick  L.  Westcott  and  C.  D.  Johnson  for 
their  comments  to  a  first  draft  of  the  manuscript.  Comments  of  two  anonymous  reviewers  and  the  editor 
improved  the  manuscript.  This  work  was  supported  by  one  SNI-CONACYT  grant  to  the  first  author. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Center,  T.  D.  and  C.  D.  Johnson.  1 976.  Host  plants  and  parasites  of  some  Arizona  seed-feeding  insects. 
Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  69(2):  195-201. 

Crawford,  J.  C.  1914.  A  revision  of  the  braconid  genus  Urosigalphus  (Hymenoptera,  Braconidae). 
Insecutor  Inscitiae  Menstruus  2:  22-21 . 

Figueroa-De  la  Rosa,  J.  I.  and  J.  Romero  N.  2002.  Ctenocolum  janzeni  Kingsolver  &  Whitehead 
(Coleoptera:  Bruchidae)  nuevo  huesped  para  Urosigalphus  (bruchiurosigalphiis)  mimosestes  Gibson 
(Hymenoptera:  Braconidae)  en  la  Reserva  de  la  Biosfera  Sierra  de  Huautla,  Morelos,  Mexico.  Acta 
Zoologica  Mexicana  (n.  s.)  85.  189-190. 

Gibson,  L.  P.  1972a.  Revision  of  the  genus  Urosigalphus  of  the  United  States  and  Canada  (Hymen- 
optera: Braconidae).  Miscellaneous  Publications  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  8:  83-134. 

Gibson,  L.  P.  1972b.  Urosigalphus  of  Mexico  and  Central  America  (Hymenoptera:  Braconidae). 
Miscellaneous  Publications  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  8:  135-157. 

Gibson,  L.  P.  1982.  New  species  of  Urosigalphus  (Hymenoptera:  Braconidae)  from  Mexico.  Proceed- 
ings of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  84(1):  97-101. 

Hetz,  M.  and  C.  D.  Johnson.  1988.  Hymenopterous  parasites  of  some  bruchid  beetles  of  North  and 
Central  America.  Journal  of  Stored  Products  Research  24(3):  131-143. 

Marsh,  P.  M.  1979.  Family  Braconidae.  Pp.  144-295.  //;,  Krombein  K.  V.,  P.  D.  Hurd  Jr..  D.  R.  Smith, 
and  B.  D.  Burks  (Editors).  1979.  Catalog  of  Hymenoptera  in  America  north  of  Mexico.  Smithsonian 
Institution  Press.  Washington,  D.  C.,  United  States  of  America.  1 198  pp. 

Marsh,  P.  M.  1997.  Subfamily  Doryctinae,  pp.  206-233.  //;,  R.  A.  Wharton,  P.  M.  Marsh  and  M.  J. 
Sharkey  (Editors).  Manual  of  the  New  World  Genera  of  the  Family  Braconidae  (Hymenoptera). 
Special  Publication  of  the  International  Society  of  Hymenopterologist  No.  1.  Washington,  D.C.  United 
States  of  America.  439  pp. 

Martin,  J.  C.  1956.  A  taxonomic  revision  of  the  triaspidine  braconid  wasps  of  Nearctic  America 
(Hymenoptera).  Canadian  Department  of  Agriculture  Publication  965:  1-157. 

Romero  N.  J.  2002.  Bruchidae.  pp.  513-534.  //;.  Llorente  B.,  J.  and  J.  .1.  Morrone  (Editors). 
Biodiversidad,  taxonomia  y  biogcografia  de  artropodos  de  Mexico:  hacia  una  sintesis  de  su 
conocimiento.  Vol.  III.  Universidad  Nacional  Autonoma  de  Mexico.  Distrito  Federal,  Mexico. 

Steffan,  J.  R.  1981.  The  parasites  of  bruchids.  pp.  223-229.  //;.  Labeyrie  V.  (Editor).  The  Ecology  of 
Bruchids  attacking  legumes  (Pulses).  Series  Entomologica  vol.  19.  W.  Junk.  The  Hague,  The  Nether- 
lands. 252  pp. 

Traveset,  A.  1991 .  Pre-dispersal  seed  predation  in  Central  American  Acacia  farnesiana:  factors  affecting 
the  abundance  of  co-occurring  bruchid  beetles.  Oecologia  87:  570-576. 

Whitfield,  J.  A.  and  C.  N.  Lewis.  2001.  Analytical  survey  of  the  braconid  wasp  fauna  (Hymenoptera: 
Braconidae)  on  six  midwestern  U.S.  tallgrass  prairies.  Annals  of  the  Entomolological  Society  of 
America  94(2):  230-238. 


178  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

PERUSTIGMUS  AND  PERUSTIGMINAE  VERHOEFF,  1941, 

INVALID  GENUS-  AND  FAMILY-GROUP  NAMES 

IN  THE  CENTIPEDE  FAMILY  SCOLOPENDRIDAE 

(SCOLOPENDROMORPHA)1 

Rowland  M.  Shelley2  and  Amazonas  Chagas,  Jr.3 

Verhoeff  (1941)  proposed  the  new  scolopendromorph  centipede  genus  Peru- 
stigmus  for  two  new  species  in  south  Peru,  P.  rapax  and  P.  ahicolus,  erecting  the 
monotypic  subfamily  Perustigminae  (family  Scolopendridae)  to  accommodate 
them.  He  did  not  designate  either  as  the  type  species,  so  according  to  Article  13.3 
of  the  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomenclature,  Perustigmus  is  an  un- 
available genus-group  name  because  it  was  published  after  1930  without  fixation 
of  a  type;  Perustigminae  is  likewise  unavailable  because  it  was  established  for  a 
genus  that  was  invalidly  proposed.  The  species,  however,  were  validly  proposed 
with  anatomical  characterizations  and  illustrations,  and  are  available  names  even 
though  the  genus  is  not  valid  or  available  (Art.  11.9.3.1).  Kraus  (1957)  placed 
both  species  in  synonymy  under  Cormocephalus  andinus  (Kraepelin,  1903) 
without  comment,  and  they  were  cited  as  synonyms  of  the  nominate  subspecies 
of  the  latter  by  Biicherl  (1974),  also  without  comment.  To  our  knowledge  the 
only  other  citations  of  any  of  these  taxa  were  by  Schileyko  (1992)  and  Schileyko 
and  Pavlinov  (1997),  who  included  Perustigmus  in  the  subfamily  Otostigminae 
(Scolopendridae)  in  their  cladistic  analyses  of  the  Scolopendromorpha.  The  basis 
for  this  assignment  is  unknown  as  it  also  lacked  comment,  but  it  may  have  been 
based  on  the  shape  of  the  spiracles  that  Verhoeff  ( 1 94 1 )  characterized  as  "rund 
bis  oval,"  rounded,  non-valvular  openings  being  characteristic  of  the  Otostig- 
minae. Their  assignments  of  the  genus  conflict  with  Kraus'  placements  of  the 
species  because  Cormocephalus  belongs  to  the  subfamily  Scolopendrinae,  which 
has  narrow,  "slit-like,"  valvular  spiracles. 

In  this  situation,  the  Code  does  not  state  whether  unavailable  names  like 
Perustigmus  and  Perustigminae  should  be  regarded  as  subjective  synonyms  of 
the  valid  names  in  which  their  components  properly  belong,  and  one  could  rea- 
sonably argue  that  the  matter  is  moot  since,  as  unavailable  names,  they  techni- 
cally do  not  exist  in  the  first  place.  The  type  specimens  of  P.  rapax  and  P.  alti- 
colus  are  cited  by  Weidner  (1960)  as  (translated  from  German)  "burned  out  in  the 


1  Received  on  March  19,  2004.  Accepted  on  July  2,  2004. 

-  Research  Lab.,  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  4301  Reedy  Creek  Rd.,  Raleigh, 
NC  27607,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  rowland.shelley@ncmail.net. 

'  Departamento  de  Invertebrados,  Laboratorio  de  Aracnologia,  Museu  Nacional/UFRJ,  Quinta  da  Boa 
Vista,  s/numero,  Sao  Cristovao,  CEP-20940-040,  Rio  de  Janeiro,  Brazil.  E-mail:  amazonaschagas(o) 
mn.ufrj.br. 

Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  3,  May  &  June  2004 179 

Zoological  Museum  Hamburg  in  1943."  According  to  Dr.  H.  Dastych,  the  pres- 
ent chief  curator  (pers.  comm.  to  RMS),  the  whole  museum  and  most  of 
Hamburg  were  destroyed  during  an  air  raid  with  incendiary  bombs  in  1943;  the 
specimens  that  had  been  previously  transferred  to  underground  tunnels  survived, 
but  the  types  of  the  two  species  of  Penistigmus  were  not  among  this  material. 
Consequently,  it  is  not  possible  to  examine  them  to  resolve  the  conflict  of 
whether  the  species  are  properly  referable  to  the  Otostigminae  or  the  Scolopen- 
drinae/Cormocephalus,  but  Verhoeff  (1941:61,  figs.  80-81)  provided  figures  of 
the  caudal  legs  of  P.  rapax  that  enable  a  decision.  In  general,  the  caudal  legs  of 
Neotropical  species  of  Cormocephalus  are  wide  and  robust;  the  prefemur  is  at 
most  only  slightly  wider  than  long  and  possesses  spines  on  the  dorsolateral, 
medial,  and  ventral  surfaces;  and  the  claw  is  longer  than  the  first  tarsus.  In  con- 
trast, the  caudal  legs  of  Neotropical  representatives  of  the  Otostigminae  are  slen- 
der; the  prefemur  is  considerably  longer  than  wide  and  may  (Rhysida)  or  may  not 
[Otostigmus  (Parotostigmus)]  possess  spines;  and  the  claw  is  shorter  than  the 
first  tarsus.  As  Verhoeff 's  drawings  conform  to  the  former  arrangement,  we 
accept  Kraus'  placement  of  both  species  as  synonyms  of,  now,  the  nominate  sub- 
species of  C.  andinus.  Consequently,  in  the  interests  of  resolving  and  simplify- 
ing the  nomenclature,  we  formally  place  Perustigmus  and  the  Perustigminae  in 
synonymy  under  Cormocephalus  Newport,  1844,  and  the  Scolopendrinae,  re- 
spectively, with  the  rejoinder  that  they  are  permanently  unavailable  names. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  A.  Minelli,  J.  G.  E.  Lewis,  and  R.  L.  Hoffman  for  nomenclatural  advice  and  prepubli- 
cation  reviews. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Biicherl,  W.  1 974.  Die  Scolopendromorpha  der  Neotropischen  Region.  Symposia  of  the  Zoological 
Society  of  London  32:99-133. 

Kraus,  O.   1957.  Myriapoden  aus  Peru.  VI.  Senckenbergiana  Biologica  38(5/6):359-404. 

Schileyko,  A.  A.  1 992.  Scolopenders  of  Viet-Nam  and  some  aspects  of  the  system  of  Scolopendro- 
morpha (Chilopoda  Epimorpha).  Part  1.  Arthropoda  Selecta  1(1):5-19. 

Schileyko,  A.  A.  and  I.  J.  Pavlinov.  1997.  A  cladistic  analysis  of  the  order  Scolopendromorpha 
(Chilopoda).  Entomologica  Scandinavica  Supplement  51:33-40. 

Verhoeff,  K.  W.  1941.  Chilopoden  und  Diplopoden.  pp.  5-72.  In,  E.  Titschack  (Editor).  Beitrage  zur 
Fauna  Perus,  nach  der  Ausbeute  der  Hamburger  Siidperu-Expedition  1936,  anderer  Sammlungen, 
wie  auch  auf  Grund  von  Literaturangaben.  Hamburg,  Germany.  Band  I . 

VVeidner,  H.  1960.  Die  Entomologischen  Sammlungen  des  Zoologischen  Staatsinstituts  und 
Zoologischen  Museums  Hamburg  III.  Teil)  Chilopoda  und  Progoneata.  Mitteilungen  aus  dem 
Hamburgischen  Zoologischen  Museum  und  Institut  58:57-104. 


180  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BOOK  REVIEW 

PEST  AND  VECTOR  CONTROL.  H.  F.  van  Emden  and  M.  W.  Service.  2004. 
Cambridge  University  Press.  40  West  20th  Street,  New  York,  NY  10011-4211 
U.S.A.  ISBN:  0521010837.  Paperback.  US$50.00.  Also  available  hardback. 

Pest  and  Vector  Control  is  a  valuable  addition  to  the  pest  management  literature.  The  authors, 
world  authorities  and  former  classmates,  have  great  enthusiasm  for  their  subject  matter.  They  write 
with  clarity  and  vigor,  and  have  produced  a  unique  book:  an  introductory  text  covering  the  theory  and 
practice  of  pest  management  for  both  agricultural  pests  and  medical/veterinary  pests.  As  the  authors 
rightly  point  out,  students  and  practioners  in  the  two  fields  rarely  interact  despite  evidence  that  man- 
agement practices  in  one  (usually  for  agricultural  pests)  have  impacted  the  ecology,  population 
dynamics,  and  control  practices  of  the  other  (key  medical  and  veterinary  pests). 

The  book  is  composed  of  13  chapters.  The  first  two  chapters  outline  the  importance  of  insects  to 
man  and  provide  a  theoretical  background  to  pest  and  vector  outbreaks.  Terms  that  may  be  unfamil- 
iar to  readers  are  defined  within  the  text,  which  is  convenient  and  improves  the  readability  of  the 
book.  The  theory  of  pest  outbreaks  receives  broad  treatment,  appropriate  for  an  introductory  text.  The 
authors  provide  an  excellent  treatment  of  man's  role  in  causing  and  exacerbating  pest  and  vector  out- 
breaks. There  is  also  a  short  section  on  the  impact  of  climate  changes  on  insect  populations.  While 
necessarily  speculative  on  the  ultimate  impact  of  these  changes  on  pest  and  vector  population  dynam- 
ics, the  authors  recognize  the  need  for  students  to  be  aware  of  this  changing  interaction. 

Chapters  3  through  12  cover  various  control  strategies.  There  is  a  fairly  heavy  emphasis  on  chem- 
ical control  with  the  first  three  chapters  devoted  to  pesticides:  formulation,  application,  and  problems 
associated  with  insecticides.  Other  control  strategies  including  cultural,  biological  and  genetic  con- 
trol, host  plant  resistance  and  the  use  of  pheromones  are  covered  in  subsequent  chapters.  The  use  of 
pathogens  in  pest  and  vector  control  is  considered  separately  from  biological  control.  The  authors 
separate  pathogens  from  biological  control  because  these  agents  are  frequently  used  more  like  pesti- 
cides than  biological  control  agents.  These  agents  also  lack  some  biological  attributes  of  predators 
and  parasitoids.  Chapter  12  covers  all  other  control  methods.  This  chapter  also  provides  readers  with 
information  on  international  organizations  involved  in  pest  and  vector  control.  While  not  an  exten- 
sive listing,  this  section  gives  students  an  introduction  to  these  organizations  and  their  missions.  An 
appendix  of  web  sites  for  these  organizations  would  have  been  helpful.  Chapter  12  also  includes  a 
brief  discussion  of  the  role  and  importance  of  community  participation.  Involving  fanners  and  com- 
munity members  in  agricultural,  medical  and  veterinary  pest  management  projects  is  complex,  par- 
ticularly in  less  developed  countries,  but  increases  the  likelihood  of  success  in  these  programs. 
Including  this  topic,  and  documenting  it  with  specific  examples,  the  authors  have  given  students 
insight  into  the  challenges  and  opportunities  of  participatory  pest  and  vector  management. 

The  final  chapter  begins  with  a  discussion  of  failed  pest  and  vector  control  projects  from  the 
1950s.  The  authors  trace  the  linkage  from  these  failures,  through  the  warnings  sounded  in  Rachel 
Carson's  Silent  Spring,  to  the  concept  of  integrated  control.  Some  of  the  ideas  and  practices  under- 
pinning integrated  control  are  then  discussed:  economic  thresholds,  monitoring,  forecasting,  model- 
ing, control  vs.  eradication,  and  combining  management  practices.  It's  interesting  that  the  book  ends 
with  the  integrated  control  concept,  a  place  many  introductory  texts  begin.  The  book  concludes  by 
mentioning  some  of  the  economic  and  social  pressures  impacting  pest  and  vector  control.  These 
include  the  increasing  demand  for  "organic"  produce,  the  growing  influence  of  consumers,  legisla- 
tive action  banning  of  specific  pesticides,  and  the  increasing  interaction  between  management  of 
agricultural  pests  and  management  of  medical  and  veterinary  pests/vectors. 

Pest  and  Vector  Control  can  be  recommended  to  both  introductory  students  and  more  experienced 
readers.  Its  strengths  are  clear,  concise  writing,  a  wealth  of  field  examples  from  around  the  world, 
and  the  unique  combination  of  covering  both  agricultural  pests  and  medical/veterinary  pests. 

Thomas  G.  Shanower,  Pest  Management  Research  Unit,  USDA-ARS-NPARL 
1500  N.  Central  Ave.,  Sidney,  MT  59270,  U.S.A.   E-mail:  tshanower(<j"sidney.ars.usda.gov 


Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


Reviewers.  When  submitting  papers,  all  authors  are  requested  to  provide  the  names  of  two  qual- 
ified individuals  who  have  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  before  it  is  submitted  to  Entomological 
News.  The  receipt  of  all  papers  will  be  acknowledged  and,  if  accepted,  they  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  possible. 

All  papers,  except  book  reviews,  are  forwarded  to  experts  for  final  review  before  acceptance.  In 
order  to  expedite  the  review  process,  authors  are  also  asked  to  suggest  the  name,  address,  email,  tele- 
phone and  fax  of  at  least  three  experts  in  the  subject  field  to  whom  the  manuscript  may  be  forward- 
ed for  additional  review.  Ideally,  the  review  process  should  be  completed  within  30  days.  The  editor 
reserves  his  prerogative  of  sending  the  manuscript  to  other  reviewers.  Authors  are  also  welcome  to 
list  the  names  of  reviewers  to  whom  the  article  should  not  be  sent,  with  a  brief  explanation. 

Upon  return  of  reviews,  authors  will  be  asked  to  modify  or  rewrite  their  texts  to  accommodate 
suggestions  of  the  reviewers  and  the  editor  as  well  as  to  conform  to  requirements  of  Entomological 
News.  If  authors  do  not  modify  their  texts,  they  should  specifically  address,  on  a  point  by  point  basis, 
why  they  are  not  doing  that. 

Page  Proofs.  The  printer  will  send  page  proofs  to  the  editor  and  the  business  manager.  Faith 
Kuehn.  Then,  the  proofs  will  be  sent  to  the  corresponding  author  as  .pdf  files,  together  with  the 
reprint  order  form  as  an  .rtf  file.  Authors  must  process  proofs  and  return  them  to  the  editor  and  to  the 
business  editor  by  air  mail  or  e-mail  (attachment).  Authors  who  anticipate  being  absent  are  urged  to 
provide  forwarding  addresses  or  to  provide  temporary  addresses  (with  dates).  Proofs  not  approved 
within  one  week  will  be  published  as  is.  The  editor  will  collect  the  page  proofs  and  send  them  to  the 
printer. 

Page  and  Reprint  Charges.  Charges  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  are  US$25.00  per 
printed  page  (or  part)  for  members  and  US$30.00  per  printed  page  (or  part)  for  nonmembers.  Authors 
will  be  charged  for  all  text  figures  and  halftones  at  the  rate  of  US$30.00  each,  regardless  of  size. 
These  charges  were  approved  by  the  American  Entomological  Society  Council  for  the  2003-2004 
United  States  Fiscal  year.  Authors  will  pay  for  color  printing  at  the  going  rate.  There  are  no  discounts. 
There  are  no  page  charges  for  book  reviews.  Page  and  reprint  charges  will  be  billed  by  Faith  Kuehn. 
to  whom  communications  and  remittances  of  page  charges  and  reprints  should  be  sent.  FK  address 
is:  3789  Foulk  Road,  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania  19061  U.S.A.  E-mail:  fbkuehn@yahoo.com. 

Articles  longer  than  20  printed  pages  of  Entomological  News  may  be  published  in  two  or  more 
installments,  unless  the  author  is  willing  to  pay  the  entire  cost  of  a  sufficient  number  of  additional 
pages  in  any  one  issue  to  enable  such  an  article  to  appear  without  division. 

If  hard  copy  reprints  are  desired,  they  must  be  ordered  together  with  the  proofs.  Reprints  as  .pdf 
files  are  available  for  the  authors.  For  options  and  charges,  contact  the  business  manager. 

Entomological  News  is  printed  by  Dover  Litho  Printing  Company.  1211  North  DuPont  Highway, 
Dover,  Delaware  19901  U.S.A.  Telephone  (302)  678-121 1:  fax:  (302)  678-8091;  toll-free  telephone 
(800)366-9132;  Web  Page:  www.doverlitho.com.  Dover  Litho  has  been  recognized  by  DENREC  and 
DELRAP  Green  Industries  as  "The  Most  Environmentally  Conscious  Printer  in  the  State  of  Dela- 
ware." 

Entomological  News  is  available  in  microform  from  ProQuest  Information  and  Learning.  Call 
toll-free  (800)  521-3042.  (800)  521-0600,  (734)  761-4700.  Mail  inquiry  to:  ProQuest  Information 
and  Learning,  300  North  Zeeb  Road,  Ann  Arbor.  Michigan  48106-9866  U.S.A. 

Entomological  News  is  listed  in  the  Science  Citation  Index  Expanded. 


iilllftlilV'vii''"'"'''"'  ]1 1,L  Q7QO 


SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  APRIL  28,  2004 
Pennsylvania  Forest  Insect  Update 

Sven-Erik  Spichiger 

Division  of  Forest  Pest  Management, 

Pennsylvania  Department  of  Conservation  and  Natural  Resources 
Harrisburg,  Pennsylvania,  U.S.A. 

The  Society's  last  meeting  of  spring  2004,  before  the  summer  hiatus,  focused  on 
forest  pest  insects  with  a  talk  given  by  Sven-Erik  Spichiger.  The  Division  of  Forest 
Pest  Management  (FPM)  is  responsible  for  the  health  of  3.9  million  state-owned 
acres  of  Pennsylvania's  17  million  forested  acres.  Insects  are  a  major  component  of 
forest  health  due  to  the  roles  they  play  in  nutrient  recycling,  damage,  regeneration, 
and  other  factors  affecting  the  forest  ecosystem.  FPM  has  used  integrated  pest  man- 
agement to  reduce  damage  to  forested  lands  by  many  different  insects  including 
gypsy  moth  (Lymantria  dispar)  and  hemlock  woolly  adelgid  (Adelges  tsugae).  FPM 
also  monitors  and  provides  Pennsylvania  with  information  and  recommendations 
about  other  forest  insects  like  elongate  hemlock  scale  (Fiorinia  externa)  and  period- 
ical cicada  (Magicicada  sp.). 

In  the  current  era  of  increased  international  trade,  the  role  of  FPM  in  the  detection 
and  management  of  new  invasive  forest  pests  has  grown  considerably.  FPM  cooper- 
ates with  other  state  and  federal  agencies  to  combat  the  establishment  of  new  inva- 
sive threats  like  emerald  ash  borer  (Agrilus  planipennis),  Asian  longhorned  beetle 
(Anoplophora  glabripennis),  and  Indian  pinecone  beetle  (Chlorophorus  strobilicola). 

In  anticipation  of  the  forthcoming  emergence  of  Brood  X  of  the  periodical  cicadas 
(Magicicada  spp.),  specimens  of  these  species  were  on  display  from  collections  of 
The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  and  Sven  Spichiger.  A  taped  loop  of  calls  of  the 
cicada  species  intermixed  with  a  song  about  the  cicadas  (by  Bob  Dylan  no  less!)  was 
provided  by  Greg  Cowper  and  gave  an  appropriate  atmosphere  to  the  proceedings. 
Hal  White  gave  a  brief  presentation  surveying  Dr.  Philip  Calvert's  life,  as  a  prelude 
to  the  Calvert  Awards  for  students,  which  were  given  out  this  night.  About  45  mem- 
bers and  visitors  were  present  at  the  meeting. 

Jon  Gelhaus,  Corresponding  Sec.  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (2004) 

E-mail:  gelhaus@acnatsci.org 


Mailed  on  January  19,  2005 


USISSN  0013-872X 


SEPTEMBER  &  OCTOBER  2004 


No.  4 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


New  distribution  records  of  mosquitoes  (Diptera:  Culicidae)  for  Yucatan,  Mexico 
Rosario  Ndjera-Vdzquez,  F.  Dzul,  M.  Sabido,  E.  Tun-Ku,  and  P.  Manrique-Saide    181 

New  records  and  clarifications  of  the  Pennsylvania  (USA)  stonefly  (Plecoptera) 
fauna,  with  an  annotated  list  of  the  stoneflies  of  Pennsylvania 

Jane  L.  Earle    1 9 1 

Fifty-three  species  of  Tetrigoidea  (Orthoptera)  from  Cenwang  Mountain  in  the 
Western  Guangxi  Zhuang  Autonomous  Region,  China 

Guo-Fang  Jiang  and  Ge-Qiu  Liang    201 

Description  of  the  male  of  Vaejovis  chisos  Sissom  (Scorpiones,  Vaejovidae)  from 
Texas,  U.S.A.,  with  comments  on  morphometric  and  meristic  variation  in 
the  species  Lee  R.  Jar\>is,  \V.  David  Sissom,  and  Richard  N.  Henson    207 

Additions  and  emendations  to  the  mayfly  (Ephemeroptera)  fauna  of 
Saskatchewan,  Canada 

J.M.  Webb,  D.W.  Parker,  DM.  Lehmkuhl,  and  W.P.  McCafferty    213 

New  species  of  Hercostomus  from  Taiwan  (Diptera:  Dolichopodidae) 

Lili  Zhang,  Ding  Yang,  and  Kazuhiro  Masunaga    219 

A  new  species  of  Amphinemura  (Plecoptera:  Nemouridae)  from  China 

Ding  Yang,  Weihai  Li,  and  Fang  Zhu    226 

A  new  genus  and  species  of  Entomobryidae  (Collembola,  Entomobryomorpha) 
from  the  south  of  the  Iberian  Peninsula 

Enrique  Baquero,  Maite  Martinez,  Ken  Christiansen,  and  Rafael  Jordana    229 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE: 

First  record  of  Microcerotermes  serrula  (Desneux)  (Isoptera:  Termitidae)  in 


Thailand 


SOCIETY  MEETING: 

Society  Meeting  of  October  20-22,  200 

The  American  Entomological  Society's 


chard  M.  Houseman    237 


on  Gelhaus    240 

2004 
Harold  B.  White 

Back  Cover 


THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

MAILED  ON  FEBRUARY  3,  2005 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS,  THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY,  AND 
NEW  GUIDELINES  FOR  AUTHORS  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 

Entomological  News  is  published  bimonthly  except  July-August  by  The  American  Entomological 
Society,  which  is  headquartered  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway, 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195  United  States  of  America.  AES  can  be  reached,  as  follows:  telephone  (215) 
561-3978;  fax  (215)  299- 1028;  e-mail,  aes@acnatsci.org  and  website:  http://www.  acnatsci.org/hosted/aes. 
Information  on  the  Calvert  Award  for  insect-related  study  by  a  young  person  in  the  Delaware  Valley  region 
sponsored  by  The  American  Entomological  Society  can  be  found  at:  http://www.udel.edu/chem/white/ 
Odonata/Cal  vertAwd.html 

Subscriptions  to  and  Back  Issues  of  Entomological  News.  Private  subscriptions  for  personal  use  of 
members  of  the  society  are  US  $15  per  year  prepaid.  Subscriptions  for  institutions,  such  as  libraries,  lab- 
oratories, etc.  and  nonmembers,  are  US  $30  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  in  the  USA  and  US  $34  per 
year  prepaid  for  those  located  outside  the  USA.  Back  issues  when  available  are  sold  by  complete  volume, 
for  US  $15  to  members,  and  US  $30  to  nonmembers.  Membership  /  subscription  application  and  additional 
information  is  available  at:  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/  subscription.html.  Please  send  inquiries  or 
send  completed  membership  form  to:  Office  Manager  at  the  address  above,  e-mail:  aes@say.acnatsci.org, 
or  call  (215)561-3978. 

Previous  editors  of  Entomological  News:  1(1)  January  1890  and  1(2)  February  1890,  Eugene  Murray 
Aaron  (1852-1940);  1(3)  March  1890  to  21(10)  December  1910,  Henry  Skinner  (1861-1926);  22(1) 
January  1911  to  54(9)  November  1943.  Phillip  P.  Calvert  ( 1871-1961);  54(10)  December  1943  to  57(10) 
December  1946,  Editorial  Staff  with  A.  Glenn  Richards  (1909-1993)  and  R.  G.  Schmieder  (1898-1967)  as 
co-editors;  58(1)  January  1947  to  79(7)  July  1968,  R.  G.  Schmieder;  79(8)  October  1968  to  83(10)  to 
December  1972,  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.  (1919-1999);  84(1)  January  1973  to  85(4)  April  1974,  R.  W.  Lake; 
85(5-6)  May  &  June  1974  to  113(3)  May  &  June  2003,  Howard  P.  Boyd;  F.  Christian  Thompson  and 
Michael  Pogue  1 13(4)  September  &  October  2002  to  1 1 3(5)  November  &  December  2002. 

New  Guidelines  for  authors  of  Entomological  News: 

Further  guidelines  can  be  found  on 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/instructions.htm 

Subject  Coverage:  Entomology,  sensu  lato.  Manuscripts  on  systematics,  ecology,  evolution,  mor- 
phology, physiology,  behavior,  biodiversity,  conservation,  paleobiology,  and  other  aspects  of  insect  and 
terrestrial  arthropod  life  as  well  as  nomenclature,  biographies  and  history  of  entomology,  among  others, 
are  appropriate  topics  for  papers  submitted  to  Entomological  News.  Papers  on  applied,  economic,  and  reg- 
ulatory entomology  or  on  toxicology  and  related  subjects  will  be  considered  only  if  they  also  make  a  major 
contribution  in  one  of  the  aforementioned  fields. 

Any  author  may  submit  papers.  Manuscripts  will  be  accepted  from  any  author,  although,  papers 
from  members  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  are  given  priority.  It  is  suggested  that  all  prospec- 
tive authors  join  the  AES. 

Send  manuscripts,  books  for  review,  and  editorial  correspondence  to  the  editor.  All  manuscripts, 
including  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews,  submitted  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  as  well  as 
all  associated  editorial  communications  must  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay  at  this  address: 
Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121 ,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  P. 
O.  Box  37012,  Washington.  D.C.  20013-7012  U.S.A.  If  an  author  uses  a  mailing  service  that  does  not 
accept  addresses  with  a  P.  O.  Box,  please  use  this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History.  Smithsonian  Institution,  West  Loading  Dock,  Washington,  District 
of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  Other  means  of  contacting  the  Editor  are.  as  follows:  Phone:  (202)  633-1383, 
Fax:  (202)  786-2832,  e-mails:  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu,  or  blayj@hotmail.com,  or  via  the  webpage  at 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/contact.  htm.  Books  for  review  should  also  be  sent  to  the 
editor  who  will,  in  turn,  give  them  to  a  colleague  for  review. 

Postmaster:  If  undeliverable,  please  send  to 
The  American  Entomological  Society  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 

1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway  /  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 
THIRD  CLASS  POSTAGE  PAID  AT  DOVER,  DELAWARE  19901  U.S.A. 


Vol.  115,  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 181 

NEW  DISTRIBUTION  RECORDS  OF  MOSQUITOES 
(DIPTERA:  CULICIDAE)  FOR  YUCATAN,  MEXICO1 

Rosario  Najera-Vazquez,2  F.  Dzul,2  M.  Sabido,2  E.  Tun-Ku,:  and  P.  Manrique-Saide14 

ABSTRACT:  As  part  of  the  West  Nile  Virus  Emergence  Program  in  Yucatan,  carried  out  by  the 
Mexican  Ministry  of  Health,  an  extensive  mosquito  larvae  survey  was  made  throughout  urban,  sub- 
urban and  rural  localities  within  66  municipalities  of  this  Mexican  State.  Larval  collections  (2623 
samples)  from  domiciliary  and  peridomiciliary  habitats  were  made  from  August  to  December  2003 
(rainy  season).  New  municipality  distribution  records  were  established  for  16  mosquito  species. 
Psorophora  howardii  was  recorded  for  Yucatan  State  for  the  first  time.  Ae.  aegypti  was  the  most 
widely  distributed  species,  and  was  recorded  in  almost  all  the  municipalities  sampled,  followed  by 
Culex  comnator.  Cx.  nigripalpus,  Cx.  quinquefasciatus,  Cx.  interrogator  and  C.v.  thriamhus.  A  wide 
variety  of  habitats,  natural  or  manmade,  were  found  positive  for  mosquitoes,  the  most  common  being 
buckets,  rock  holes,  water  storage  tanks,  and  laundry  or  kitchen  items,  all  of  which  hosted  a  large 
number  of  different  species. 

KEY  WORDS:  Diptera,  Culicidae,  Mexico,  Yucatan,  new  distribution  records 

Published  contributions  to  the  knowledge  of  mosquito  fauna  of  the  Mexican 
state  of  Yucatan  (N  21°36',  S  19°32'  latitude;  E  87°32',  W  90°25'  longitude)  are 
scarce  and  geographically  restricted.  In  the  most  recent  document  about  mosqui- 
toes of  Mexico  that  specifically  mentioned  the  species  richness  of  Yucatan, 
Ibanez-Bernal  et  al.  (1996)  reported  forty-five  species,  but  did  not  include  de- 
tailed information  about  localities  and  species  distribution.  Other  published  lit- 
erature about  the  mosquito  fauna  of  Yucatan  reports  the  presence  of  approxi- 
mately 50  species  (Vargas,  1956;  Diaz-Najera  and  Vargas,  1973;  Ibanez-Bemal 
and  Martinez-Campos,  1994;  Rivas  et  al.,  2000).  The  majority  of  these  reports 
only  refer  to  "Yucatan"  or  the  Municipality  of  Merida,  the  location  of  the  capital 
city  of  Yucatan  State,  yet  there  are  105  additional  municipalities  within  the  state. 

Historically,  mosquito  studies  in  Yucatan  have  been  primarily  directed 
towards  the  control  of  Aedes  aeg\>pti  and  Dengue  virus  transmission  or  the  reduc- 
tion of  nuisance  biting.  Recently  the  potential  emergence  of  West  Nile  virus 
( WNV)  in  the  area  has  resulted  in  a  renewed  interest  in  entomology  in  the  state. 
Yucatan  is  considered  a  likely  point  of  incursion  of  this  virus  into  Latin  America 
because  it  is  a  principal  landfall  for  many  species  of  birds  that  migrate  from  the 


1  Received  on  April  1 8,  2004.  Accepted  on  September  1 ,  2004. 

:  Secretaria  de  Salud  de  Yucatan.  Calle  72  No.  463.  Col.  Centre  Merida,  Yucatan,  Mexico.  E-mails: 
(RN-J)  mnajera@sureste.com,  (FD)  fdzul@espn.insp.mx,  (ET-K)  etunk^iespn.insp.mx. 

'  Campus  de  Ciencias  Biolologicas  y  Agropecuarias,  Universidad  Autonoma  de  Yucatan,  Apartado 
Postal  4-116  It/imna,  Merida,  Yucatan,  Mexico. 

"London  School  of  Hygiene  and  Tropical  Medicine.  Kcppcl  Street,  London  WC1L  7HT.  I'nited 
Kingdom.  E-mail:  Pablo. ManriqueSaidew  Ishtm.ac.uk. 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  115(4):  181,  September  &  October  2004 
Mailed  on  February  3,  2005 


182  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Northeastern  and  Midwestern  United  States  (Lorono-Pino  et  al.,  2003).  In  re- 
sponse, the  Mexican  Ministry  of  Health  established  an  entomological  surveil- 
lance program  in  the  state  in  order  to  get  a  more  precise  picture  of  the  distribu- 
tion of  mosquito  fauna  in  the  different  localities  of  Yucatan. 

METHODS 

As  part  of  the  WNV  Emergence  Program  in  Yucatan,  carried  out  by  the 
Mexican  Ministry  of  Health,  an  extensive  mosquito  larvae  survey  was  conduct- 
ed in  premises  throughout  urban,  suburban,  and  rural  localities  within  66  munic- 
ipalities between  August  and  December  2003,  during  the  rainy  season.  Due  to 
time  constraints  all  localities  were  visited  at  least  once  during  the  study  period, 
and  no  attempt  was  made  to  count  habitats  without  larvae.  Upon  entering  the  col- 
lection site,  inspectors  visually  scanned  the  area  for  containers  or  other  potential 
habitats  for  larval  development,  and  then  examined  all  of  them  for  larvae.  Larvae 
found  in  small  containers  were  collected  either  by  use  of  a  zooplankton  net  or 
pipetted  with  a  turkey  baster.  In  larger  breeding  sites,  larvae  were  collected  by 
sweeping  the  surface  of  the  water  with  a  net  for  aquatic  insects.  Inspectors  col- 
lected only  a  sample  of  larvae  from  each  collection  site. 

From  domiciliary  and  peridomiciliary  containers  and  other  habitats  positive 
for  mosquito  larvae,  2,623  samples  were  collected  and  preserved  in  vials  with 
ethanol  70  percent  and  subsequently  transported  to  the  Servicios  de  Salud  of  Yu- 
catan headquarters  or  the  Zoology  Laboratory  of  the  Universidad  Autonoma  de 
Yucatan.  Specimens  from  each  sample  were  examined  in  alcohol  using  a  dis- 
secting scope,  separated,  and  identified  using  the  keys  by  Clark-Gil  and  Darsie 
(1983)  and  Ibanez-Bernal  and  Martinez-Campos  (1994).  Samples  of  the  speci- 
mens, mounted  on  slides,  are  deposited  in  the  Coleccion  Entomologica  Regional 
(CER)  of  the  Universidad  Autonoma  de  Yucatan. 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

A  list  of  mosquito  larvae  species  is  presented  here,  along  with  their  spatial  dis- 
tribution (presence  or  absence)  at  the  municipality/locality  level  of  urban,  subur- 
ban and  rural  areas  of  Yucatan,  Mexico.  The  number  of  specimens  examined  is 
not  available  for  all  locations,  and  is  therefore  not  included.  However,  at  least 
one  specimen  of  each  species  had  to  be  present  for  a  locality  to  be  considered 
positive.  Municipalities  are  given  in  uppercase,  followed  by  the  locality  and  the 
date  of  collection.  When  known,  the  neighborhood  ("colonia,"  "barrio,"  or  "frac- 
cionamiento")  is  mentioned,  and  the  longitude/latitude  coordinates  for  each 
locality  are  given  for  all  locations. 

The  larval  collections  in  the  Mexican  state  of  Yucatan  during  the  rainy  season 
of  2003  established  new  municipality  distribution  records  for  16  species.  Psoro- 
phora  howardii  is  first  reported  for  Yucatan  State.  Ae.  aegypti,  the  most  widely 
distributed  species,  was  recorded  in  98.5  percent  of  the  municipalities,  followed 
by  Culex  coronator,  Cx.  nigripalpus,  Cx.  quinquefasciatus,  C.\.  interrogator  and 


Vol.  115.  No.  4,  September  &  October  2004 183 


s 

x> 

s 

u 
u 

t*  SJillf.TUAlfJOXQl 

X 

X                    XX 

X 

X  X 

X 

X 

X 

u 

Q 

o 

snquiDuiii  UQ 

X 

X        X        XX 

X 

X  X 

X 

X  X 

X 

X  X  X  X  X 

I 

s>iini.~>s'n/<i>ilntinb  \JQ 

X 

XXX        XX 

X 

X 

X 

X  X 

X 

X  X  X  X  X 

••  —  ' 
p 

sndjnduSiu  'xj 

XX              XX 

X 

X 

X 

X  X 

x 

XX              X 

'x 

^ 

.toin8o.u3)iti  'xj 

X 

X 

XXX        XX 

x 

X  X 

X 

X  X 

x 

XX        X 

1 

.IOJVUO.IO3  'X-~) 

X 

XX              XX 

X 

X  X 

X  X 

x 

XX        XX 

0 

3 

0 

.111]  '-.tO  'J  'XJ 

X 

X                   XX 

X 

X  X 

X  X 

X 

X 

en 

u 

1 

suapiq  'xj 

X 

X 

X 

1 

•dS  iH.tooato 

X 

X  X 

XX              XX 

X 

X 

X  X 

x 

X  X 

TD 

iip.tnM.oif  'sj 

X 

C3 

stuiffuoo  •£</ 

X 

X) 

3 

smpu^M,,™,,,  JQ 

X 

g 

ai.iv]ndv.~>s  'OQ 

X 

X                       X 

X 

X 

x 

X 

Xj 

1 

.vunipups  JQ 

X 

X 

O 

.C 

§ 

snwwposaiu  -8H 

X 

—• 

snumba  'Sfj 

X 

X 

XX              XX 

x 

X 

X 

x 

XX              X 

en 

1 

siuoisnisDuv  'Sj-{ 

X 

X 

XX                   X 

X 

X 

X 

x 

X 

D, 

en 

iid.<Sao  w 

X 

X  X 

XX              XX 

X 

X  X 

X 

X  X 

x 

X  X  X  X  X 

X 

'en 
00 

smtmuniin  -uy 

X 

X 

X 

C 

is 

IH 

-o 

U 

£ 

en 

U 
en 

B 

X) 

C3 

0 
u 

1 

CO 

~5L 
-o 

'u 

,*J 

o 

u 

T3 

'•'-       O 

CO 

-J 

1) 

CJ 

•s> 

en 

c 

'S 

I 

§ 
en 
U 

'G 

en 

"S 

"o 

0    ^ 

i  f 

5  '2 

~a  "0 

o 

c 

s 

"c. 

c. 

'S. 

_<? 

D 

2 

00 

o 
u 

IH 

43 

T3 

a 

en                       ^ 

I 

.  Mosquito  spe 

oo 
•5 

PQ 

1 

2 

3 

o 

II 

la 

en                              •-      C 

""    o               e    ra 
J  -o        S   SS   t 

"    J=      en    XT      f«    T3 
-^      „.    T3      e«      '->      c 

S    g    §  ||    § 
a:  (-  o.  2  Z  _) 

c 

CO 

C 

- 

o 

c 

Discardcd  i 
Used  tires 

rj 

is 
D 

2 
o 

en 

IT,   « 

&    1> 

•^     ra 
^    CQ 

Animal  wal 

en          ^     !r. 
ea          c    ^ 

«      >              2      3 

o     o            ej     ^* 
•*     <—-'»- 
u     £    ~.       )     ° 

3  2  4J    o7  o 
oa  u.  :>  c^  oi 

c 

'x 
O 

X)    O 

03    O 

f-   r4 

184  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Cx.  thriambus.  The  remaining  species  were  only  registered  for  less  than  one  third 
of  the  municipalities.  It  was  not  possible  to  identify  some  specimens,  like  Toxor- 
hynchites  and  Wyeomyia,  to  species  level,  nor  was  it  possible  to  clearly  differen- 
tiate between  Cr,  corniger-lactator  specimens  with  the  identification  keys  used. 

The  breeding  sites  where  samples  of  each  species  were  collected  are  listed  in 
Table  1.  Breeding  sites  were  classified  in  three  groups:  natural,  nonessential,  and 
useful  (Pan  American  Health  Organization,  1994).  The  second  and  third  group 
includes  manmade  containers  or  artificial  water  bodies.  Although  a  wide  variety 
of  types  of  containers  were  observed,  they  were  grouped  under  representative 
names.  Most  of  the  names  used  to  typify  the  containers  are  commonly  used  and 
known  in  the  mosquito  literature. 

As  evident  from  Table  1 ,  most  of  the  species  reported  were  found  breeding  in 
a  wide  variety  of  containers,  natural  or  manmade,  useful  or  nonessential,  but  also 
in  other  habitats  like  temporary  pools,  ponds  and  marshes.  Ae.  aegypti,  Cx.  quin- 
quefasciatus,  Cx.  interrogator  and  Cx.  thriambus  were  the  species  most  com- 
monly observed  in  all  the  types  of  breeding  sites. 

All  breeding  sites,  whether  natural,  nonessential,  or  useful,  harbored  signifi- 
cant species  diversity.  However,  buckets,  rock  holes,  water  storage  tanks,  and 
laundry  or  kitchen  utensils  reported  a  larger  diversity  of  species  and  were  also 
the  most  common  habitats  positive  for  mosquito  larvae.  Although  no  data  regard- 
ing productivity  (population  density  or  abundance)  of  the  breeding  sites  is  avail- 
able, it  appears  that  any  control  effort  against  mosquitoes  should  incorporate  not 
only  solid  waste  and  environmental  management  (destruction,  alteration,  dispos- 
al or  recycling  of  containers  and  natural  habitats),  but  also  the  improvement  of 
water  supply  and  storage. 

Subfamily  Anophelinae 

Anopheles  (Nyssorrhynchus)  albimanus  Wiedemann 

Material  Examined:  HOCTUN:  Hoctiin  (N  20°51' 12.11",  W  89°1  T53.34"),  10  Nov  2003; 
MERIDA:  Dzitya  (N  21°2"38.29",  W  89°40"28.03"),  24  Nov  2003;  MERIDA  (N  20°58'12.94",  W 
89°36'59.97"),  3  Dec  2003;  PROGRESO:  Chicxulub  Puerto  (N  22°16"23.35",  W  89°35'40.93"),  23 
Sep  2003. 

Subfamily  Culicinae 

Tribe  Aedini 

Aedes  (Stegomyia)  aegypti  (L.) 

Material  Examined:  ACANCEH:  Acanceh  (N  20°48'12.33";  W  89°27'5.42"),  14  Nov  2003; 
AKIL:  Akil  (N  20°16'1.76";  89021'25.23"),  7  Oct  2003;  BOKOBA:  Bokoba  (20°59'21.71".  W 
89°10'32.94"),  8  Sep  2003,  10-11  Oct  2003,  10-11  Nov  2003;  BUCTZOTZ:  Buctzotz  (N 
2I°10'31.16",  W  88"46'54.88"),  30  Sep  2003,  13-14  Oct  2003;  CACALCHEN:  Cacalchen  (N 
20°58'1.45",  W  89°13'14.22"),  11  Sep  2003;  CANSAHCAB:  Cansahcab  (N  2P8'15.14",  W 
89°5'34.86"),  18  Dec  2003;  CANTAMAYEC:  Cantamayec  (N  20°28'3.7",  W  89"4'54.87"),  2,  4-5,  8 
Sep  2003,  Cholul  (N  20°26'22.03",  W  89°9'31.59"),  20  Oct  2003;  CALOTMUL:  Pocoboch  (N 
20°56'47.34"  W  88°6'14.82"),  4  Nov  2003;  CELESTUN:  Celestiin  (N  20°52'16.97",  W  90°23'48.88"). 
4,  6-7  Oct  2003;  CHACSINKIN:  Chacsinkin  (N  20°10' 15.98",  W  89°!' 18.30"),  1 1-12,  15  Sep  2003; 
CHAPAB:  Citincabchen  (20031'35.7r,  W  89°32'23.81"),  4  Sep  2003,  27  Oct  2003;  CHEMAX: 
Chemax  (N  20°37'52.63",  W  87°55'41.93"),  2  Sep  2003,  24  Dec  2003,  Sisbichen  (N  20°48'0.28",  W 


Vol.  115,  No.  4,  September  &  October  2004 185 


87°54'46.75"),  10  Nov  2003,  Xalau  (N  20°39'31.65",  W  88°0'5.46"),  3  Nov  2003,  8  Dec  2003; 
CHICHIMILA:  Chichimila  (N  20°36'44.09",  W  88°12'41.87"),  1-2  Oct  2003;  CHIK1NDZONOT: 
Chikindzonot  (N  20°19'26.13",  W  88°29'9.60"),  11  Sep  2003;  CHOCHOLA:  Chochola  (N 
20°45'15.09",  W  89°50'1.98"),  9  Sep  2003,  8  Dec  2003;  CHUMAYEL:  Chumayel  (N  20°25'40.33", 
W  89°18'20.50"),  23-24,  29  Aug  2003,  2-4,  22,  29  Sep  2003,  10,  14-16  Oct  2003;  CONKAL:  Conkal 
(N  21°3'44.55",  W  89°30'53.06"),  8,  10  Sep  2003;  CUNCUNUL:  Cuncunul  (N  20°37'17.06",  W 
88°17'33.36"),  22  Oct  2003;  DZAN:  Dzan  (N  20°23'30.65",  W  89°28'30.18"),  29  Oct  2003; 
DZEMUL:  Dzemul  (N  21°11'29.77",  W  89°18'10.28"),  10  Dec  2003;  DZIDZANTUN:  Dzidzantiin 
(N  21°13'27.27",  W  8901'55.32"),  10  Sep  2003,  15  Oct  2003;  DZILAM  GONZALEZ:  Dzilam 
Gonzalez  (N  21°15'19.45",  W  88°55'0.97"),  11  Dec  2003;  DZILAM  DE  BRAVO:  Dzilam  de  Bravo 
(N  21°21'0.76",  W  88°52'51.67"),  11  Dec  2003;  DZITAS:  Dzitas  (N  20°49'7.58",  W  88°31'21.76"), 
17  Sep  2003,  23  Oct  2003,  Xocempich  (N  20°45'8.H",  W  88°34'1.61"),  27  Nov  2003;  ESPITA: 
Espita  (N  20°58'56.07",  W  88°17'51.38"),  5,  13  Nov  2003;  HALACHO:  Chuc-Holoch  (N 
20°28'5.18",  W  90°6'45.75"),  17  Sep  2003,  Halacho  (N  20°29'35.62",  W  90°5'26.89"),  17,  27  Sep 
2003;  HOCABA:  Hocaba  (20°48'1 1.64",  W  89°14'39.12"),  19  Sep  2003;  HOCTUN:  Hoctiin,  10  Nov 
2003;  HUNUCMA:  Hunucma  (N  21°00'56.56",  W  89°52'25.88"),  29  Sep  2003;  IZAMAL:  Izamal  (N 
20055'3.41",  W  89°00'46.41"),  1  Sep  2003;  KAUA:  Kaua  (N  20°36' 16.89",  W  88°24'35.40"),  18  Sep 
2003;  KANASIN:  Fraccionamiento  Hector  Victoria,  30  Oct  2003,  Kanasin  (N  20°55'51.07",  W 
89°32'57.75"),  14  Aug  2003,  1  Oct  2003;  KANTUNIL:  Holca  (N  20°44'35.82",  W  88°55'41.65"),  25 
Sep  2003;  KOPOMA:  Kopoma  (N  20°39' 15.41",  W  89°54'15.55"),  26  Sep  2003,  8  Dec  2003;  MAM: 
Mani  (N  20°23' 18.00",  W  89°23'48.57"),  18  Aug  2003,  25  Sep  2003,  27-28  Nov  2003,  1-3  Dec  2003, 
Tipikal,  10  Dec  2003;  MERIDA:  Colonia  Amalia  Solorzano,  30  Sep  2003,  1-2  Oct  2003,  Colonia 
Amapola,  12,  18  Nov  2003,  Colonia  Benito  Juarez,  23  Sep  2003,  Colonia  Buenavista,  19  Nov  2003, 
Camara  Construccion,  2  Dec  2003,  Caucel,  4  Sep  2003,  Centre,  13  Oct  2003,  10-11,  13,  24,  26-27 
Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Chenku,  24,  27-28  Nov  2003,  Colonia  Chichen  Itza,  25-26,  29  Sep  2003, 

8  Dec  2003,  Cholul,  4  Sep  2003,  1 1  Nov  2003,  Colonia  Azcorra,  12  Sep  2003,  Merida,  21  Nov  2003, 
Colonia  Sarmiento,  8  Oct  2003,  Dzitya,  8  Oct  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Francisco  de  Montejo,  19  Nov 
2003,  Colonia  Itzimna,  12  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Juan  Pablo,  15  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento 
Juan  Pablo  Ote,  22  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Lindavista,  17,  24  Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Mag- 
nolias, 21  Nov  2003,  1  Dec  2003,  Colonia  Nueva  Chichen,  23  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Pedregales 
de  Tanlum,  17  Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Residencial  Pensiones,  16-17  Oct  2003,  Fraccionamiento 
Terranova,  21,28  Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel,  30  Aug  2003,  1 1  Sep  2003,  4-5,  8-9  Dec  2003, 
Fraccionamiento  Vergel  I,  5  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  II,  8  Sep  2003,  25  Oct  2003,  25  Nov 
2003,  3-5,  7,  11  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  III,  3-5,  8-9  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel 
IV,  9,  11  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  V,  9  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  65,  5,  9  Dec 
2005,  11  Sep  2003,  Colonia  Vicente  Guerrero,  2  Oct  2003,  Colonia  Vicente  Solis,  15  Sep  2003; 
MUXUPIP:  Muxupip  (N  21°1'49.42",  W  89°19'21.30"),  18  Sep  2003,  27  Nov  2003;  OPICHEN: 
Calcehtok  (N   20"34'41.52",  W  89°55'12.78"),  20  Aug  2003;  OXKUTZCAB:   Cooperativa  (N 
20°13'57.38",  W  89°28'35.95"),  9  Oct  2003,  12-14,  16,  18  Nov  2003,  Xohuayan  (N  20°ir22.81".  W 
89°23'9.99"),  13  Nov  2003,  Yaxhachen  (N  20°3'44.63",  W  89°34'41.88"),  6-7,  11-12  Nov  2003; 
PETO:  Peto  (N  20°7'38.87",  W  88°55'31.98"),  12,  16-17  Sep  2003;  PROGRESO:  Chicxulub  Puerto, 

9  Aug  2003,  9  Sep  2003,  Chuburna  Puerto  (N  21°14'28.64",  W  89°47'47.70"),  19  Sep  2003,  Frac- 
cionamiento Campestre  Flamboyanes,  18  Sep  2003,  Progreso  (N  21°15'59.17",  W  89°39' 14.39"),  2 
Oct  2003,  Hacienda  San  Ignacio  (N  21°8'36.94",  W  89°39'2.61"),  29  Aug  2003;  RJO  LAGARTOS: 
Rio  Lagartos  (N  21°33'17.86",  W  88°8'33.36"),  12  Nov  2003;  SAMAHIL:  San  Antonio  Tedzidz  (N 
20°53'5.85",  W  89°53' 16.60"),  27  Oct  2003;  SANTA  ELENA:  Santa  Elena  (N  20°20'7.11",  W 
89°39'5.08"),  10,  23-26  Sep  2003;  SOTUTA:  Sotuta  (N  20°35'20.19",  W  89°0'25.2r'),  20  Oct  2003, 
Tibolon  (N   20°39'25.52",  W  88°56'23.37"),  21   Oct  2003;   SUMA:   Suma  (N   2103'58.35",   W 
89°8'28.28'),  3  Sep  2003;  TAHDZIU:  Tahd/iu  (N  20°12'9.95",  W  88°56'55.07"),  18-19.  24  Sep  2003; 
TAHMEK:  Tahmek  (N  20051'53.29",W  89"  15' 15. 65"),  5,  9,  13-14  Oct  2003,  3,  5-7,  9,  12  Nov  2003; 
TEABO:  Teabo  (N  20'>23'56.09",  W  89°17'13.64"),  21-22,  26,  18  Aug  2003,  10.  14-15.  24  Oct  2003; 
TEKANTO:  Tekanto  (N  20°59'36.62",  W  89°6'0.70"),  9  Sep  2003;  TEKAX:  San  Isidro  Maquian  (N 
19°50'43.17",  W  89"25'53.13"),  2  Sep  2003,  Huntochac  (N  19°49'19.66",  W  89°30'52.65"),  3  Sep 
2003,Tekax  (N  20°12'26.24",  W  89°17'51.99"),  19  Sep  2003.  Kinil  (N  20°19'21.92",  W  89°8' 16.49"), 
1  Oct  2003,  Pencuyut  (N  20°17'41.47",  89°17'53.06"),  1-2.  7  Oct  2003,  Xaya  (N  20°17'42.62".  W 


186  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


89°1 1*29.91"),  1-3,  5-7,  9  Oct  2003,  Kancab  (N  20°1 1*40.63",  W  89°20'56.25"),  6-7,  25  Nov  2003, 
San  Pedro  Xtoquil  (N  19°46'6.85",  W  89°26'40.76"),  27  Aug  2003;  TEKIT:  Tekit  (N  20°31'56.92",  W 
89°20'5.22"),  18  Nov  2003;  TEKOM:  Tekom  (N  20°35'9.65",  W  88°15'35.95"),  22-24  Sep  2003; 
TELCHAC  PUEBLO:  San  Crisanto  (N  21°19'32.13",  W  89°9'46.34"),  10  Oct  2003;  TEMAX:  Temax 
(N21°7'39.50",  W88°55'45.03"),  13  Nov  2003;  TICUL:  Colonia  Obrera,  13-14,  17  Nov  2003,  Barrio 
Guadalupe,  10  Oct  2003,  17  Nov  2003,  Kinder,  3  Nov  2003,  Barrio  Mejorada,  12  Nov  2003,  Pustu- 
nich  (N  20°22'26.22",  W  89°3 1*0.31"),  29  Sep  2003,  6  Oct  2003,  Barrio  San  Enrique,  3  Nov  2003, 
Barrio  San  Juan,  13,  15  Nov  2003,  Colonia  San  Joaquin,  22  Sep  2003,  31  Oct  2003,  Barrio  San 
Roman,  7-8,  10-11,  24  Nov  2003,  Barrio  Santiago,  4-7  Nov  2002,  Ticul  (N  20°24'9.21",  W 
89°32'32.43"),  5-6,  10,  29-30  Sep  2003,  27.  30  Oct  2003,  3-4,  7,  12  Nov  2003,  Yotholin  (N 
20°19'45.02",  W  89°27'37.78"),  29-30  Oct  2008,  13,  15  Oct  2003;  T1NUM:  Piste  (N  20°40'56.30",  W 
88°35'4.87"),  20  Oct  2003;  TIXCACALCUPUL:  Tixcacalcupul  (N  20°31' 19.78",  W  88°1 5*50.83"), 
24  Sep  2003;  TIXKOKOB:  Ekmul  (N  20°57'8.97",  W  89°20'43.95"),  22  Sep  2003,  1-3  Dec  2003, 
Tixkokob  (N  20°59'17.24",  W  89°23'24.73"),  20  Nov  2003;  TIXMEHUAC:  Chicam  (N  20°20'15.34", 
W  89°9'41.45"),  24  Oct  2003,  Kimbila  (N  20"! 7*40. 13",  W  89°5'25.71"),  24  Oct  2003;  TIZIMIN: 
Popolnah  (N  20°57'46.94",  W  87°33'4.35"),  3  Sep  2003,  Tizimin  (N  21°6'49.32",  W  88°8'27.54"),  5- 
6,  11,  17-19,  24-25  Nov  2002,  1-2,  10  Dec  2003;  TZUCACAB:  Tzucacab  (N  20°4'30.20",  W 
89°3'15.58"),  29  Aug  2003;  UAYMA:  Uayma  (N  20°41'52.58",  W  88°18'35.16"),  15  Aug  2003,  10, 
15  Sep  2003;  UMAN:  Uman  (N  20°52'43.80",  W  89"44'47.03"),  5,  8-9  Sep  2003;  VALLADOLID: 
Valladolid  (N  20°40'7.73",  W  88"!  1*58.45"),  25  Sep  2003,  9  Oct  2003,  4,  26  Nov  2003;  XOCCHEL: 
Xocchel  (N  20°49'16.29",  W  89°10'54.01"),  19  Sep  2003;  YAXCABA:  Libre  Union  (N  20°41'39.78", 
W  88°48'24.86"),  9  Dec  2003,  Yaxunah  (20°31'46.58",  W  88°40'25.50"),  7  Oct  2003;  YAXKUKUL; 
Yaxkukul  (N  21°2'58.86",  W  89°24'39.33"),  18  Oct  2003. 

Haemagogus  (Haemagogus)  anastasionis  Dyar 

Material  Examined:  CHUMAYEL:  Chumayel,  10,  17  Oct  2003;  KANTUNIL:  Holca,  25  Sep 
2003;  KOPOMA:  Kopoma,  8  Dec  2003;  MAN  I:  Mani,  28  Nov  2003;  MERIDA:  Dzitya,  8  Oct  2003; 
OXKUTZCAB:  Cooperativa,  13-14  Nov  2003;  SOTUTA:  Sotuta,  20  Oct  2003;  TAHDZIU:  Tahdziii, 
30  Sep  2003;  TAHMEK:  Tahmek,  6-7  Nov  2003;  TEKAX:  Xaya,  3  Oct  2003;  TEMAX:  Temax,  3 
Nov  2003;  TICUL:  Colonia  Obrera,  14  Nov  2003;  TIXCACALCUPUL:  Tixcacalcupul,  25  Sep  2003; 
TIXKOKOB:  Ekmul,  2-3  Dec  2003;  TIZIMIN:  Tizimin,  1 1  Nov  2003;  YAXKUKUL:  Yaxkukul,  18 
Oct  2003. 

Haemagogus  (Haemagogus)  equinus  Theobald 

Material  Examined:  CHACSINKJN:  Chacsinkin,  15  Sep  2003;  CHAPAB:  Citincabchen,  4  Sep 
2003;  CHEMAX:  Kuxeb  (N  20°49'47.33",  W  87051'49.32"),  24  Nov  2003;  CHUMAYEL:  Chumayel, 
10,  15.  17  Oct  2003;  CUNCUNUL:  Cuncunul,  22  Oct  2003;  HOCABA:  Hocaba,  19  Sep  2003; 
MANI:  Mani,  27  Nov  2003,  1  Dec  2003;  MERIDA:  Dzitya,  8  Oct  2003;  OXKUTZCAB:  Xohuayan, 
13  Nov  2003,  Yaxhachen,  12  Nov  2003;  SANTA  ELENA:  Santa  Elena,  26  Sep  2003;  SOTUTA: 
Soruta,  20  Oct  2003;  TAHDZIU:  Tahdziu,  30  Sep  2003;  TAHMEK:  Tahmek,  14  Oct  2003;  TEABO: 
Teabo,  21  Aug  2003;  TEKAX:  Mesatunich  (N  19°49'39.36",  W  89°25'45.94"),  2  Sep  2003,  Xaya,  3, 
9  Oct  2003;  TICUL:  Colonia  Obrera,  13  Nov  2003,  Pustunich,  29  Oct  2003,  Barrio  San  Juan,  7  Nov 
2003,  Ticul,  6  Nov  2003,  Yotholin,  15  Oct  2003;  TIXKOKOB:  Ekmul,  2  Dec  2003;  TIZIMJN:  Tizi- 
min, 17  Nov  2003;  UAYMA:  Uayma,  15  Oct  2003;  YAXKUKUL:  Yaxkukul,  18  Oct  2003. 

Haemagogus  (Haemagogus)  mesodentatus  Komp  and  Kiiiiiin 
Material  Examined:  TAHDZIU:  Tahdziu,  30  Sep  2003. 

Ochlerotatus  (Ochlerotatus)  scapularis  (Rondan) 

Material  Examined:  ACANCEH:  Acanceh,  14  Nov  2003;  CHACSINKJN:  Chacsinkin,  15  Sep 
2003;  CHAPAB:  Citincabchen,  4  Sep  2003;  HOCTUN:  Hoctun,  10  Nov  2003;  OXKUTZCAB: 
Cooperativa,  13-14  Nov  2003,  Yaxhachen,  10-12  Nov  2003;  SOTUTA:  Sotuta,  20  Nov  2003,  Tibo- 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 187 


Ion,  21  Oct  2003;  TAHDZIU:  Tahdziu,  30  Sep  2003;  TAHMEK:  Tahmek,  9,  12,  14  Nov  2003; 
TEKAX:  Xaya,  3  Oct  2003;  TEKOM:  Tekom,  23  Sep  2003;  TICUL:  Colonia  Obrera,  14  Nov  2003, 
Barrio  San  Juan,  23  Nov  2003. 

Ochlerotatus  (Ochlerotatus)  sollicitans  (Walker) 

Material  Examined:  DZAN:  Dzan,  28  Oct  2003;  MERIDA:  Fraccionamiento  Magnolias,  21 
Nov  2003;  TIXKOKOB:  Ekmul,  1  Dec  2003;  CHEMAX:  Sisbichen,  10  Nov  2003. 

Ochlerotatus  (Ochlerotatus)  taeniorhynchus  (Wiedemann) 
Material  Examined:  CELESTUN:  Celestun,  7  Oct  2003. 

Psorophora  (Grabhamia)  conflnnis  (Arribalzaga) 
Material  Examined:  TEKAX:  Huntochac,  3  Sep  2003. 

Psorophora  (Psorophora)  howardii  Coquillett 
Material  Examined:  TEKAX:  Xaya,  3  Oct  2003. 

Tribe  Culicini 
Culex  (Culex)  bidens  Dyar 

Material  Examined:  CHEMAX:  Chemax,  4  Oct  2003;  DZITAS:  Dzitas,  17  Sep  2003; 
OXKUTZCAB:  Yaxhachen,  6  Nov  2003;  SANTA  ELENA:  Santa  Elena,  26  Sep  2003;  TIZIMIN: 
Tizimin,  6  Nov  2003. 

Culex  (Culex)  coronator  Dyar  and  Knab 

Material  Examined:  ACANCEH:  Acanceh,  14  Nov  2003;  BOKOBA:  Bokoba,  8  Sep  2003.  1 1 
Oct  2003;  BUCTZOTZ:  Buctzotz,  30  Sep  2003,  13-14  Oct  2003;  CACALCHEN:  Cacalchen,  1 1  Sep 
2003;  CANSAHCAB:  Cansahcab,  3  Sep  2003,  18  Dec  2003;  CANTAMAYEC:  Cantamayec,  2-5,  9- 
10  Sep  2003,  21-22  Oct  2003;  CALOTMUL:  Pocoboch,  4  Nov  2003;  CHACSINKJN:  Chacsinkin, 
1 1-12,  15  Sep  2003;  CHAPAB:  Citincabchen,  4  Sep  2003,  27  Oct  2003;  CHEMAX:  Chemax,  2  Sep 
2003,  Kuxeb,  24  Dec  2003,  Sisbichen,  10  Nov  2003,  Xalau,  3  Nov  2003,  8  Dec  2003;  CHICHIM- 
ILA:  Chichimila,  1-2  Oct  2003;  CHIKINDZONOT:  Chikindzonot,  11  Sep  2003,  6  Oct  2003;  CHU- 
MAYEL:  Chumayel,  29  Aug  2003,  2-5,  22  Sep  2003,  10,  14-17  Oct  2003;  CHOCHOLA:  Chochola, 
9  Sep  2003,  8  Dec  2003;  CONKAL:  Conkal,  8,  10  Sep  2003,  Xcuyiin  (N  21°2'7.93",  W 
89°29'36.98"),  27  Aug  2003;  CUNCUNUL:  Cuncunul,  22  Oct  2003;  DZAN:  Dzan,  28-29  Oct  2003; 
DZEMUL:  Dzemul,  10  Dec  2003;  DZIDZANTUN:  Dzidzantun,  10  Sep  2003,  15  Oct  2003;  DZIL- 
AM  GONZALEZ:  Dzilam  Gonzalez,  1 1  Dec  2003;  DZITAS:  Dzitas,  17  Sep  2003;  ESPITA:  Espita, 
13  Nov  2003;  HALACHO:  Cuch-Holoch,  17  Sep  2003,  Halacho,  27  Sep  2003;  HOCABA:  Hocaba. 
19  Sep  2003;  HOCTUN:  Hoctiin,  10  Nov  2003;  HUNUCMA:  Hunucma,  26  Aug  2003,  29  Sep  2003, 
Texan  Palomeque  (N  20°55'50'37",  W  89°49'42.34"),  28  Sep  2003  ;  IZAMAL:  Izamal,  1  Sep  2003; 
KAUA:  Kaua,  18  Sep  2003;  KANASIN:  Fraccionamiento  Hector  Victoria,  30  Oct  2003,  Kanasin,  14 
Aug  2003,  1  Oct  2003;  KANTUNIL:  Holca,  25  Sep  2003;  KOPOMA:  Kopoma,  26  Sep  2003,  8  Dec 
2003;  MANJ:  Mani,  18  Aug  2003.  1-2  Dec  2003,  Tipikal,  10  Dec  2003;  MERIDA:  Colonia  Amalia 
Solorzano,  2  Oct  2003,  30  Sep  2003,  Colonia  Amapola.  12  Nov  2003,  Colonia  Benito  Juarez,  23  Sep 
2003,  Colonia  Buenavista,  19  Nov  2003,  Camara  Construccion,  2  Dec  2003,  Caucel,  4  Sep  2003. 
Centre,  24  Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Chcnku,  26  Nov  2003,  Cholul,  4  Sep  2003.  1 1  Nov  2003, 
Merida,  21  Nov  2003.  Colonia  Sarniiento,  8  Oct  2003,  Dzitya,  8  Oct  2003,  Colonia  It/imna.  \2  Dec 
2003,  Fraccionamiento  Juan  Pablo,  15  Dec  2003,  Colonia  Mulsay,  2  Dec  2003,  Colonia  Nueva 
Chichen,  23  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento  San  Jose  Vergel,  22,  25.  29  Aug  2003.  Fraccionamiento 
Terranova,  21,  28  Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel,  8  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  II,  8  Sep 
2003,  25  Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  III,  8  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  IV,  17  Sep 


188  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


2003,  11  Dec  2003;  MUXUPIP:  Muxupip,  28  Aug  2003,  18  Sep  2003,  27  Nov  2003;  OPICHEN: 
Calcehtok,  20  Aug  2003;  OXKUTZCAB:  Cooperativa,  12-14,  18  Nov  2003,  Xohuayan,  13  Nov  2003, 
Yaxhachen,  6,  1 1  - 1 2  Nov  2003;  PETO:  Peto,  1 2,  1 6- 1 7  Sep  2003,  Xoy  (N  20°7'3 1 .99",  W  88°58'48.3 1 " ), 

2  Oct  2003;  PROGRESO:  Chicxulub  Puerto,  9  Aug  2003,  Chuburna  Puerto,  19  Sep  2003,  Frac- 
cionamiento   Campestre   Flamboyanes,    18   Sep   2003,   Hacienda   San   Ignacio,   28-29  Aug   2003; 
SAMAHIL:  San  Antonio  Tedzidz,  27,  31  Oct  2003;  SANTA  ELENA:  Santa  Elena,  23-26  Sep  2003; 
SOTUTA:  Sotuta,  20  Oct  2003,  Tibolon,  21  Oct  2003;  SUMA:  Suma,  3  Sep  2003;  TAHDZIU:  Tahdziu, 
18,  23,  25,  30  Sep  2003,  5,  9,  13-14  Oct  2003,  3,  6  Nov  2003;  TEABO:  Teabo,  21-22,  26-29  Aug  2003, 
15,  24  Oct  2003;  TEKANTO:  Tekanto,  9  Sep  2003;  TEKAX:  Huntochac,  3  Sep  2003,  Kancab,  6,  25 
Nov  2003,  Mesatunich  (N  19°49'39.59",  W  89°25'46.62"),  2  Sep  2003,  Pencuyut,  1-2,  7  Oct  2003,  San 
Isidro  Maquian,  2  Sep  2003,  San  Isidro  Yaxche  (N  19°53'38.75",  W  89°26'57. 13"),  3  Sep  2003,  San  Juan 
Tekax(N  19°43'8.16",  W  89°27'1.63"),  27  Aug  2003,  Tekax,  19  Sep  2003,  Xaya,  1-3,  6-9  Oct  2003,  San 
Pedro  Xtoquil  (N  19°46'4.24",  W  89°26'39.36"),  27  Aug  2003;  TEKOM:  Tekom,  22-24  Sep  2003; 
TEMAX:  Temax,  13  Nov  2003;  TICUL:  Colonia  Obrera,  17  Nov  2003,  Pustunich,  29-30  Sep  2003,  6 
Oct  2003,  Barrio  San  Juan,  27  Oct  2003,  3  Nov  2003,  Barrio  San  Roman,  24  Nov  2003,  Barrio  Santiago, 
6  Nov  2003,  Ticul,  5,  10,  29  Sep  2003,  4  Nov  2003,  Yotholin,  29  Sep  2003,  13,  15  Oct  2003;  TINUM: 
Piste,  20-21  Oct  2003;  TIXCACALCUPUL:  Tixcacalcupul,  24  Sep  2003;  TIXKOKOB:  Ekmul,  22  Sep 
2003,   1-3  Dec  2003,  Ruinas  de  Ake  (N  20°56'16.57",  W  89°17'50.91"),  2  Dec  2003;  TIZIMIN: 
Popolnah,  3  Sep  2003,  Tizimin,  5-6,  11,  17-19,  24  Nov  2003,  2,  10  Dec  2003;  TZUCACAB:  Tantankin, 
29  Aug  2003,  Tzucacab,  1  Oct  2003,  25  Sep  2003,  27,  29  Aug  2003;  UAYMA:  Uayma,  15  Aug  2003, 
15  Oct  2003;  UMAN:  Uman,  19  Aug  2003,  5,  8  Sep  2003;  VALLADOLID:  Valladolid,  17  Aug  2003, 

25  Sep  2003,  9  Oct  2003,  Xocempich,  27  Nov  2003;  XOCCHEL:  Xocchel,  19  Sep  2003;  YAXCABA: 
Libre  Union,  9  Dec  2003,  Yaxunah,  7  Oct  2003. 

Culex  (Culex)  interrogator  Dyar  and  Knab 

Material  Examined:  BOKOBA:  Bokoba,  II  Oct  2003;  BUCTZOTZ:  Buctzotz,  30  Sep  2003,  13- 
14  Oct  2003;  CANTAMAYEC:  Cantamayec,  2  Sep  2003;  CELESTUN:  Celestun,  7  Oct  2003;  CHAC- 
SINKIN:  Chacsinkin,  11-12  Sep  2003;  CHEMAX:  Chemax,  4  Sep  2003,  Xalau,  3  Nov  2003,  8  Dec 
2003,  Kuxeb,  24  Dec  2003;  CHIKINDZONOT:  Chikindzonot,  1 1  Sep  2003;  CHUMAYEL:  Chumayel, 
2,  29  Sep  2003,  15-16  Oct  2003,  CUNCUNUL:  Cuncunul,  2  Oct  2003;  DZIDZANTUN:  Dzidzantun, 
10  Sep  2003;  CHOCHOLA:  Chochola,  8  Dec  2003;  HUNUCMA:  Hunucma,  26  Aug  2003;  IZAMAL: 
Izamal,  1  Sep  2003;  KAUA:  Kaua,  18  Sep  2003;  KANASIN:  Kanasin,  14  Aug  2003,  1  Oct  2003;  KAN- 
TUNIL:  Holca,  25  Sep  2003;  MANL  Mani,  28  Nov  2003;  MERIDA:  Colonia  Amalia  Solorzano,  30  Sep 
2003,  Colonia  Benito  Juarez,  23  Sep  2003,  Camara  Construccion,  2  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento 
Chenku,  27  Dec  2003,  Colonia  Chichen  Itza,  25  Sep  2003,  Cholul,  4  Sep  2003,  Merida,  21  Nov  2003, 

3  Dec  2003,  Colonia  Itzimna,  12  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel,  8  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento 
Vergel  II,  25  Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  III,  12  Sep  2003;  MUXUPIP:  Muxupip,  18  Sep  2003, 
27  Nov  2003;  OPICHEN:  Calcehtok,  20  Aug  2003;  OXKUTZCAB:  Cooperativa,   14  Nov  2003, 
Yaxhachen,  6,  12  Nov  2003;  PETO:  Xoy,  2  Oct  2003;  PROGRESO:  Chicxulub  Puerto,  9  Aug  2003,  9 
Sep  2003;  SOTUTA:  Tibolon,  21  Oct  2003;  TAHDZIU:  Tahdziu,  18  Sep  2003;  5,  9  Oct  2003.  9,  12  Nov 
2003;  TEABO:  Teabo,  21-22  Aug  2003,  14-15  Oct  2003;  TEKAX:  Kancab,  25  Nov  2003,  San  Isidro 
Maquian,  2  Sep  2003,  San  Juan  Tekax,  27  Aug  2003,  Xaya,  1-3  Oct  2003;  TEKOM:  Tekom,  22  Sep 
2003;  TICUL:  Pustunich,  29  Sep  2003,  Barrio  San  Juan,  3  Nov  2003,  Yotholin,  29  Sep  2003,  15  Oct 
2003;  TIXKOKOB:  Ekmul,  1-2  Dec  2003;  TIZIMIN:  Tizimin,  6,  19  Nov  2003.   10-11   Dec  2003; 
UAYMA:  Uayma,  10  Sep  2003;  UMAN:  Uman,  9  Sep  2003;  VALLADOLID:  Valladolid,  25  Sep  2003, 

26  Nov  2003. 

Culex  (Culex)  nigripalpus,  Theobald 

Material  Examined:  ACANCEH:  Acancch,  14  Dec  2003;  BUCTZOTZ:  Buctzotz,  30  Sep  2003, 
13-14  Oct  2003;  CANSAHCAB:  Cansahcab,  18  Dec  2003;  CANTAMAYEC:  Cantamayec.  2.  8-9  Sep 
2003,  22  Oct  2003;  CELESTUN:  Celestun,  4  Oct  2003;  CHACSINKIN:  Chacsinkin,  11-12.  15  Sep 
2003;  CHAPAB:  Citincabchen,  4  Sep  2003;  CHEMAX:  Chemax,  2  Sep  2003,  Xalau,  X  Dec  2003; 
CHICHIMILA:  Chichimila,  2  Oct  2003;  CHUMAYEL:  Chumayel,  2-3  Sep  2003;  CUNCUNUL: 
Cuncunul,  22  Oct  2003;  DZAN:  Dzan,  28  Oct  2003;  DZIDZANTUN:  Dzidzantun,  15  Oct  2003; 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 189 


DZITAS:  Dzitas,  17  Sep  2003,  23  Oct  2003;  HOCABA:  Hocaba,  19  Sep  2003;  HOCTUN:  Hoctun,  10 
Nov  2003;  K.AUA:  Kaua,  18  Sep  2003;  KANASJN:  Fraccionamiento  Hector  Victoria,  30  Oct  2003; 
KANTUNIL:  Hoica,  25  Sep  2003;  MERIDA:  Colonia  Amapola,  12  Nov  2003,  Colonia  Buenavista,  19 
Nov  2003,  Centre,  10  Oct  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Chenkii,  26  Nov  2003,  Colonia  Chichen  Itza,  25  Sep 
2003,  Merida,  21  Nov  2003,  Dzitya,  8  Oct  2003,  Colonia  Itzimna,  12  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Lin- 
davista,  17  Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Residencial  Pensiones,  16  Oct  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel,  3, 
8  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  II,  4  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  III,  8-9  Dec  2003,  Frac- 
cionamiento Vergel  65,  5  Dec  2003;  MUXUPIP:  Muxupip,  27  Nov  2003;  OPICHEN:  Calcehtok.  20  Aug 
2003;  OXKUTZCAB:  Yaxhachen,  12  Nov  2003;  SAMAHIL:  San  Antonio  Tedzidz,  27  Oct  2003; 
SANTA  ELENA:  Santa  Elena,  25  Sep  2003;  SOTUTA:  Sotuta,  20  Oct  2003;  TAHDZIU:  Tahdziu,  21 
Sep  2003;  TAHMEK:  Tahmek,  5,  9,  14  Oct  2003,  5-6  Nov  2003;  TEABO:  Teabo,  21  Aug  2003,  10  Oct 
2003;  TEKAX:  San  Isidro  Maquian,  2  Sep  2003,  Tekax,  19  Sep  2003,  Xaya,  1-3  Oct  2003;  TEKOM: 
Tekom,  22  Sep  2003;  TEMAX:  Temax,  13  Nov  2003;  TICUL:  Colonia  Obrera,  14  Nov  2003,  Barrio  San 
Roman,  10  Nov  2003,  Barrio  San  Juan,  3  Nov  2003;  TINUM:  Piste,  20  Oct  2003;  TIXCACALCUPUL: 
Tixcacalcupul,  24  Sep  2003;  TIXKOKOB:  Ekmul,  1-2  Dec  2003;  TIZIMiN:  Tizimin,  5-6,  19  Nov  2003, 
II  Dec  2003;  VALLADOLID:  Valladolid,  22,  25  Sep  2003,  Xocempich,  27  Nov  2003;  XOCCHEL: 
Xocchel,  19  Oct  2003;  YAXCABA:  Yaxunah,  7  Oct  2003. 

Culex  (Culex)  quinquefasciatiis  (Say) 

Material  Examined:  BUCTZOTZ:  Buctzotz,  13  Oct  2003;  CANTAMAYEC:  Cantatnayec,  2,  5,  10 
Sep  2003;  CELESTUN:  Celestun,  26  Aug  2003,  3,  6-7  Oct  2003;  CHACSINKJN:  Chacsinkin.  15  Sep 
2003;  CHAPAB:  Citincabchen,  4  Sep  2003,  27  Oct  2003;  CHEMAX:  Chemax,  4  Sep  2003;  CHICHIM- 
ILA:  Chichimila,  1,15  Oct  2003;  CHUMAYEL:  Chumayel,  24  Aug  2003,  3  Sep  2003,  15  Oct  2003; 
CUNCUNUL:  Cuncunul,  22  Oct  2003;  DZIDZANTUN:  Dzidzantiin,  15  Oct  2003;  DZILAM  GON- 
ZALEZ: Dzilam  Gonzalez,  1 1  Oct  2003;  DZITAS:  Dzitas,  17  Sep  2003;  ESPITA:  Espita,  13  Nov  2003; 
CHOCHOLA:  Chochola,  8  Dec  2003;  HOCABA:  Hocaba,  19  Sep  2003;  HUNUCMA:  Hunucma,  26 
Aug  2003;  KAUA:  Kaua,  18  Sep  2003;  KANASJN:  Kanasin,  14  Aug  2003,  1  Oct  2003;  KOPOMA: 
Kopoma,  26  Sep  2003;  MANL  Mani,  2  Dec  2003;  MERIDA:  Colonia  Amalia  Solorzano,  30  Sep  2003, 
Colonia  Amapola,  12  Nov  2003,  Colonia  Benito  Juarez,  23  Sep  2003,  Caucel,  4  Sep  2003,  Centra,  24 
Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Chenku,  26  Nov  2003,  Colonia  Chichen  Itza,  25  Sep  2003,  Cholul,  4  Sep 
2003,  Merida,  21  Nov  2003,  3  Dec  2003,  Colonia  Itzimna,  12  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Lindavista,  7 
Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel,  1 1  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  I.  5  Dec  2003,  Fracciona- 
miento Vergel  II,  25  Nov  2003,  4  Dec  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  III,  12  Sep  2003,  5,  9-8  Dec  2003, 
Fraccionamiento  Vergel  65,  1 1  Sep  2003,  5  Dec  2003,  Colonia  Vicente  Solis,  15  Sep  2003;  MUXUPIP: 
Muxupip,  27  Nov  2003,  18  Sep  2003,  28  Aug  2003;  OPICHEN:  Calcehtok,  20  Aug  2003;  OXKUTZ- 
CAB: Cooperative,  13  Nov  2003,  Yaxhachen,  6  Nov  2003;  PETO:  Peto,  12  Sep  2003;  PROGRESO: 
Chuburna  Puerto,  19  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Campestre  Flamboyanes,  18  Sep  2003.  Hacienda  San 
Ignacio,  29  Aug  2003,  Progreso,  2  Oct  2003;  RJO  LAGARTOS:  Rio  Lagartos,  12  Nov  2003; 
SAMAHIL:  San  Antonio  Tedzidz,  27  Dec  2003;  SANTA  ELENA:  Santa  Elena,  23-26  Sep  2003;  SOTU- 
TA: Sotuta,  20-21  Oct  2003,  Tibolon,  21  Oct  2003;  TAHDZIU:  Tahdziu,  19  Sep  2003;  TAHMEK: 
Tahmek,  5,9,  13-14  Oct  2003,  5-6,  9  Nov  2003;  TEABO:  Teabo,  21-22,  27  Aug  2003,  10.  14-15.  24  Oct 
2003;  TEKANTO:  Tekanto,  9  Sep  2003;  TEKAX:  Huntochac,  3  Sep  2003,  Xaya,  2-3  Oct  2003;  TEKIT: 
Tekit,  8  Nov  2003;  TEKOM:  Tekom,  22  Sep  2003;  TICUL:  Pustunich,  29-30  Sep  2003,  Barrio  San  Juan. 
3,  8  Nov  2003,  Barrio  San  Roman,  8  Nov  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Santamaria,  3  Nov  2003.  Barrio 
Santiago,  7  Nov  2003,  Ticul,  5  Sep  2003,  30  Oct  2003,  12  Nov  2003,  Yotholin,  29  Sep  2003;  TIXKO- 
KOB: Ekmul.  22  Sep  2003,  1-3  Dec  2003;  TIZIMJN:  Popolnah.  3  Sep  2003.  Ti/imin,  6.  17.  19  Nov 
2003,  1-2,  10-11  Dec  2003;  UMAN:  Uman,  19  Aug  2003,  5.  9  Sep  2003;  YAXCABA:  Libre  Union.  9 
Dec  2003. 

Culex  (Culex)  thriamhus  Dyar 

Material  Examined:  BOKOBA:  Bokoba,  8  Sep  2003.  11,  14  Ocl  2003;  C'ACAI  (HI  N:  Cacalchcn. 
11  Sep  2003;  CANSAHCAB:  Cansahcab,  3  Sep  2003;  CANTAMAYEC:  Cantamayec,  2,  5,  10  Sep 
2003;  CELESTUN:  Celestun,  26  Aug  2003;  CHACSINKJN:  Chacsinkin,  12  Sep  2003;  CHEMAX: 
Chemax,  4  Sep  2003;  CHIKINDZONOT:  Chikindzonot,  1 1  Sep  2003;  CHUMAYEL:  Chumayel,  2  Sep 


190  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


2003;  DZIDZANTUN:  Dzidzantiin,  10  Sep  2003;  DZITAS;  Dzitas,  17  Sep  2003;  HALACHO: 
Cuch-Holoch,  17  Sep  2003,  Halacho,  17,  27  Sep  2003;  HUNUCMA:  Hunucma,  2,  26  Aug  2003,  9 
Sep  2003,  Texam  Palomeque,  28  Sep  2003;  IZAMAL:  Izamal,  1  Sep  2003;  KANASlN:  Kanasin,  14 
Aug  2003,  1  Oct  2003;  KANTUNIL:  Holca,  25  Sep  2003;  KOPOMA:  Kopoma,  26  Sep  2003; 
MERIDA:  Colonia  Amalia  Solorzano,  30  Sep  2003,  1  Oct  2003,  Colonia  Benito  Juarez,  23  Sep  2003, 
Caucel,  4  Sep  2003,  Cholul,  4  Sep  2003,  Colonia  Miraflores,  18  Aug  2003,  Merida,  3  Dec  2003, 
Colonia  Nueva  Chichen,  23  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento  San  Jose  Vergel,  22,  25  Aug  2003,  Frac- 
cionamiento  Vergel,  10-11  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  II,  8,  21  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento 
Vergel  III,  12-11  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  IV,  17  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Vergel  65,  1 1 
Sep  2003;  MOTUL:  Motul  (N  21°4'41.14',  W  89°16'41.48"),  21  Aug  2003;  MUXUPIP:  Muxupip,  28 
Aug  2003,  18  Sep  2003;  OPICHEN:  Calcehtok,  20  Aug  2003;  OXKUTZCAB:  Cooperativa,  14Nov 
2003,  Yaxhachen,  6,  1 1  Nov  2003;  PROGRESO:  Chicxulub  Puerto,  9  Aug  2003,  Chuburna  Puerto, 
19  Sep  2003,  Fraccionamiento  Campestre  Flamboyanes,  18  Sep  2003,  Progreso,  2  Oct  2003, 
Hacienda  San  Ignacio,  28-29  Aug  2003;  SAMAHIL:  San  Antonio  Tedzidz,  27  Oct  2003;  SANTA 
ELENA:  Santa  Elena,  23  Sep  2003;  SUMA:  Suma,  3  Sep  2003;  TAHDZIU:  Tahdziu,  18,  21,  23  Sep 
2003;  TEABO:  Teabo,  22  Aug  2003;  TEKANTO:  Tekanto,  9  Sep  2003;  TEKAX:  Xaya,  3,  9  Oct 
2003;  TICUL:  Carretera  Estatal,  26  Sep  2003,  Barrio  San  Juan,  3,  15  Nov  2003,  Yotholin,  13  Oct 
2003;  TIXKOKOB:  Ekmul,  22  Sep  2003,  3  Dec  2003;  TIXMEHUAC:  Chicam,  24  Oct  2003; 
UMAN:  Uman,  19  Aug  2003,  5,  9  Sep  2003. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  are  grateful  to  all  the  personnel  from  each  sanitary  jurisdiction  with  special  reference  to  Jorge 
Chan  and  Santos  Vazquez  Narvaez  for  their  kind  assistance  in  the  field  work,  as  well  to  Azael  Che 
and  Adan  Zapata  for  their  help  on  some  of  the  mosquito  samples  identification.  Pablo  Manrique- 
Saide  has  a  grant  from  the  Consejo  Nacional  de  Ciencia  y  Tecnologia  (CONACYT,  Mexico)  and  the 
"Programa  de  Impulse  y  Orientacion  a  la  Investigacion  (PRIORI-UADY)."  We  also  thank  Annemarie 
terVeen  and  the  anonymous  reviewers  for  their  useful  comments  to  the  manuscript. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Clark-Gil,  S.  and  R.F.  Darsie,  Jr.  1983.  The  mosquitoes  of  Guatemala,  their  identification,  distri- 
bution and  bionomics,  with  keys  to  adult  females  and  larvae  in  English  and  Spanish.  Mosquito 
Systematics  15:  151-284. 

Diaz-Najera,  A.  and  L.  Vargas.  1973.  Mosquitos  mexicanos.  Distribucion  geografica  actualizada. 
Revista  de  Investigacion  en  Salud  Piiblica  (Mexico)  33:  111-125. 

Ibanez-Bernal,  S.  and  C.  Martinez-Campos.  1994.  Clave  para  la  identificacion  de  larvas  de  mos- 
quitos  comunes  en  las  areas  urbanas  y  suburbanas  de  la  Republica  Mexicana  (Diptera:  Culicidae). 
Folia  Entomologica  Mexicana  92:  43-73. 

Ibanez-Bernal,  S.,  D.  Strickman,  and  C.  Martinez-Campos.  1996.  Culicidae  (Diptera).  //;. 
Llorente,  B.  J.,  A.  A.  N.  Garcia,  and  S.  E.  Gonzalez  (Editors).  Biodiversidad,  taxonomia  y  biogeo- 
grafia  de  artropodos  de  Mexico.  Hacia  una  sintesis  de  su  conocimiento.  CONABIO-IBUNAM. 
pp.  591-602. 

Lorono-Pino,  M.  A.,  B.  J.  Blitvich,  J.  A.  Farfan-Ale,  F.  I.  Puerto,  J.  M.  Blanco,  N.  L.  Marlenee, 
E.  P.  Rosado-Paredes,  J.  E.  Garcia-Rejon,  D.  J.  Gubler,  C.  H.  Calisher,  and  B.  J.  Beaty. 

2003.  Serologic  evidence  of  West  Nile  virus  infection  in  horses,  Yucatan  State,  Mexico. 
Emerging  Infectious  Diseases  9  (7):  857-859. 

Pan  American  Health  Organizacion.  1994.  Dengue  and  Dengue  Haemorragic  Fever  in  the  Amer- 
icas: Guidelines  for  prevention  and  control.  PAHO  Scientific  Publication  No.  548. 

Rivas,  G.,  A.  Che,  and  P.  Manrique-Saide.  2000.  Artropodos  domesticos  y  peridomesticos  de 
importancia  sanitaria  en  Yucatan,  Mexico.  Revista  Biomedica.  1 1 :  S64. 

Vargas,  L.  1956.  Especies  y  distribucion  de  mosquitos  mexicanos  no  anofclinos  (Insecta  Diptera). 
Revista  de  Investigacion  en  Salud  Piiblica  (Mexico)  16(1):  19-36. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  4,  September  &  October  2004 191 

NEW  RECORDS  AND  CLARIFICATIONS  OF  THE 

PENNSYLVANIA  STONEFLY  (PLECOPTERA)  FAUNA, 

WITH  AN  ANNOTATED  LIST  OF  THE  STONEFLIES  OF 

PENNSYLVANIA,  U.S.A.1 

Jane  I.  Earle2 

ABSTRACT:  Five  species,  Nemoitra  trispinosa  Claassen,  Strophoptetyx  appalachia  Ricker  and 
Ross,  Alloperla  biserrata  Nelson  and  Kondratieff,  Neoperla  robisoni  Poulton  and  Stewart,  and  Neo- 
perla  choctaw  Stark  and  Baumann,  are  added  to  the  Pennsylvania  fauna.  Five  species,  Allocapnia 
wrayi  Ross,  Leuctra  carolinensis  Claassen,  Tallaperla  anna  (Needham  and  Smith),  Tallaperla  elisa 
Stark,  and  Malirekus  hastatus  (Banks)  are  deleted.  An  annotated  list  of  the  133  described  Pennsyl- 
vania stonefly  species  is  presented. 

KEY  WORDS:  Stoneflies,  Plecoptera,  Pennsylvania  (U.S.A.),  new  records,  clarifications,  ecoregions 

Surdick  and  Kim  (1976)  published  the  first  definitive  review  of  the  Pennsyl- 
vania stonefly  fauna,  recording  90  species  in  nine  families  and  32  genera.  Stark 
et  al.  (1986)  reported  94  species  in  Pennsylvania.  Earle  (1994)  added  14  species 
and  deleted  four  species  previously  added  in  error.  Masteller  (1996a)  added  17 
species,  deleted  five  species,  and  presented  an  annotated  list  of  Pennsylvania 
species  that  included  131  described  species  plus  three  undescribed  Isoperla 
species.  Grubbs  and  Stark  (2001)  added  two  Perlesta  species,  P.  nelsoni  Stark 
and  P.  teavsia  Kirchner  and  Kondratieff,  bringing  the  Pennsylvania  list  to  133 
described  species. 

Five  species  are  added  herein  to  the  Pennsylvania  list:  Nemoura  trispinosa 
Claassen,  Strophoptetyx  appalachia  Ricker  and  Ross,  Alloperla  biserrata 
Nelson  and  Kondratieff,  Neoperla  robisoni  Poulton  and  Stewart,  and  Neoperla 
choctaw  Stark  and  Baumann.  Five  species  added  in  error  are  deleted:  Allocapnia 
wrayi  Ross,  Leuctra  carolinensis  Claassen,  Tallaperla  anna  (Needham  and 
Smith),  Tallaperla  elisa  Stark,  and  Malirekus  hastatus  (Banks).  With  these  addi- 
tions and  deletions,  the  Pennsylvania  stonefly  fauna  total  remains  at  134  des- 
cribed species;  however,  since  several  more  soon  to  be  described  species  will  be 
added  to  the  Pennsylvania  list  within  the  next  few  years,  the  Pennsylvania  spec- 
ies list  could  approach  140. 

Collections  of  new  species  records  presented  are  by  the  author.  New  county 
records  are  capitalized.  An  annotated  list  of  Pennsylvania  species  is  presented  in 
Table  1.  Voucher  specimens  will  be  placed  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
of  Philadelphia.  Ecoregion  information  is  from  Woods  et  al.  (1996). 


1  Submitted  on  June  2,  2004.  Accepted  on  September  19,  2004. 

2  Pennsylvania  Department  of  Environmental  Protection,  P.  O.  Box  8555,  Harrisburg,  Pennsylvania 
17105  U.S.A.  Current  mailing  address:  20  Red  Fox  Lane,  Mechanicsburg.  PA  17050.  E-mail: 
jearle@sprintmail.com. 

Mailed  on  February  3,  2005 


192  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ADDITIONS 

Nemouridae:  Nemoura  trispinosa:  MONROE  COUNTY:  Red  Run,  Industri- 
al Road  (41°07'  42"N,  75°22'48"W),  one  female,  May  15,  2003.  This  is  a  small,  low 
gradient  stream  with  a  swampy  riparian  area.  Red  Run  is  in  the  Pocono  High 
Plateau  section  of  the  North  Central  Appalachians  Ecoregion,  which  is  a  low  relief, 
forested  highland  with  many  lakes  and  low  gradient  streams  with  few  riffles 
(Woods  et  al.  1996).  N.  trispinosa  is  distributed  across  the  northern  US  and  Cana- 
da, west  to  Manitoba  and  Wyoming  and  south  to  Ohio  (Stark  2001). 

Taeniopterygidae:  Strophopteryx  appalachia:  HUNTINGDON  COUNTY: 
Shade  Creek  near  Orbisonia  (40°12'19"N,  77°52'39"W),  one  male,  April  25,  1994; 
FULTON  COUNTY:  Tonoloway  Creek,  SR  2005  (39°43t41"N,  78°09'08"W),  28 
March  2003,  6  males;  Sideling  Hill  Creek,  PA  Route  484  (39°44'35"N,  78°21' 
33"W),  28  March  2003,  one  male  and  one  female;  BEDFORD  COUNTY:  Town 
Creek  at  Blues  Gap  Road  (39°46'45"N,  78°30'12"W),  one  female.  Shade  Creek  is 
a  3rd  order  limestone  influenced  stream  in  the  Susquehanna  River  basin;  the  other 
streams  are  4th  order  streams  in  the  Potomac  River  basin.  All  are  within  the  Ridge 
and  Valley  Ecoregion.  The  two  northeastern  species  of  Strophopteryx  are  appar- 
ently sympatric  at  least  through  part  of  their  range,  since  one  male  Strophopteryx 
fasciata  (Burmeister)  was  collected  at  the  Tonoloway  Creek  site  and  from  another 
nearby  stream,  Little  Tonoloway  Creek.  Stewart  (2000)  reported  that  S.  appalachia 
is  found  in  the  Appalachian  Mountain  region  from  West  Virginia  south  to  South 
Carolina.  A  northern  range  extension  of  S.  appalachia  into  the  Potomac  River  basin 
Maryland  was  recorded  by  Grubbs  (1997).  This  record  extends  the  northern  limit 
of  this  species  into  southcentral  Pennsylvania  and  the  lower  edge  of  the  Susque- 
hanna River  basin.  No  other  specimens  of  S.  appalachia  have  so  far  been  identi- 
fied from  farther  north  in  Pennsylvania. 

Chloroperlidae:  Alloperla  biserrata:  BEDFORD  COUNTY,  Blackberry  Lick 
Creek,  PA,  Route  26  (39°47'05"N,  78°24'23"W),  one  male,  May  17,  2002.  Black- 
berry Lick  Creek  is  a  2nd  order,  largely  forested  stream  in  the  Ridge  and  Valley 
Ecoregion,  Potomac  River  basin.  This  is  the  ninth  described  species  of  Alloperla 
now  recorded  from  Pennsylvania.  A.  biserrata  was  described  from  collections  from 
several  small  streams  in  Virginia  (Nelson  and  Kondratieff  1980).  Since  the  initial 
description,  A.  biserrata  has  also  been  reported  from  Maryland  and  West  Virginia 
(Grubbs  1997  and  Stark  2001). 

Perlidae:  The  Nearctic  Neoperla  were  for  many  years  believed  to  be  one  vari- 
able, widespread  species,  Neoperla  clymene  (Newman),  until  Stark  and  Baumann 
(1978)  described  several  new  species  and  removed  several  others  from  synonymy 
with  N.  clymene,  resulting  in  eight  North  American  species.  Subsequent  research- 
ers described  several  more  species,  bringing  the  total  number  of  North  American 
species  to  15  (Stark  1990  and  DeWalt  et  al.  2002).  Masteller  (1996a)  reported  4 
species  of  Neoperla  from  Pennsylvania,  N.  clymene,  Neoperla  catharae  Stark  and 
Baumann,  Neoperla  occipitalis  (Pictet),  and  Neoperla  steward  Stark  and  Bau- 
mann. The  following  two  additional  species  will  bring  the  Pennsylvania  Neoperla 
species  total  to  six. 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 193 

Neoperla  robisoni:  BERKS  COUNTY:  Maiden  Creek,  PA,  Route  143,  V2 
mile  north  of  1-78  (40°34'55"N,  75°53'27"W)  one  male,  June  27,  2000;  PERRY 
COUNTY:  Susquehanna  River,  Marysville  (40°21'04"N,  76°55'51"W),  one  male, 
July  17,  1993  and  one  male  July  25,  1998;  Juniata  River,  Greenwood  boat  access 
(40°31'48"N,  77°08'33"W)  one  male,  June  24,  1994.  All  locations  are  in  the 
Ridge  and  Valley  Ecoregion.  N.  robisoni  was  described  by  Poulton  and  Stewart 
from  the  Ozark  Mountains  (Ernst  et  al.  1986).  These  Pennsylvania  records  rep- 
resent a  range  extension  farther  northeast  from  the  previous  northern  limit,  the 
Potomac  River  in  Maryland  (Grubbs  1997)  and  into  the  Susquehanna  and  Dela- 
ware River  basins  of  Pennsylvania.  The  Pennsylvania  and  Maryland  collections 
of  N.  robisoni  are  from  medium  to  large,  swift,  rocky  creeks  and  rivers.  The  other 
records  are  from  large,  lowland  streams  in  the  southeastern  United  States,  from 
Mississippi  to  Tennessee  (Grubbs  1997). 

Neoperla  choctaw:  CUMBERLAND  COUNTY:  Conodoguinet  Creek, 
Mountain  Road  (40°09'06"N,  77°30'00"W),  3  females,  August  6,  1998.  PERRY 
COUNTY:  Susquehanna  River,  Marysville  (40°21'04"N,  76055'51"W)  one 
female  with  eggs,  July  13,  2002.  The  Pennsylvania  habitats  are  large  warm  water 
creeks  and  rivers  in  the  Ridge  and  Valley  Ecoregion  of  the  Susquehanna  River 
basin.  These  records  extend  the  distribution  of  N.  choctaw  north  from  its  previ- 
ously reported  distribution  of  Arkansas,  Missouri,  Oklahoma,  and  West  Virginia 
(Stark  2001).  N.  choctaw  adults  have  distinctive  coloring;  the  wings  are  dark 
brown  to  black  and  the  body  is  checkered  black  and  orange. 

DeWalt  et  al  (2002)  reported  that  Neoperla  are  found  in  relatively  clean 
streams  and  that  4  of  the  7  species  historically  known  from  Illinois  are  now  extir- 
pated and  2  others  have  had  significant  reductions  in  range.  The  presence  of  the 
six  Neoperla  species  currently  in  Pennsylvania  is  a  testament  to  the  good  quali- 
ty water  of  many  of  our  larger  creeks  and  rivers.  Neoperla,  however,  have  been 
under-collected  as  both  nymphs  and  adults  in  Pennsylvania.  Additional  collect- 
ing in  their  preferred  habitat  should  provide  a  better  picture  of  their  true  distri- 
bution and  abundance  in  Pennsylvania. 

CORRECTIONS 

Stark  (2001)  and  Stewart  and  Stark  (2002)  presented  compilations  of  state 
records  for  the  North  American  stonefly  species.  Not  all  the  additions  and  dele- 
tions presented  in  Earle  (1994)  and  Masteller  ( 1996a)  were  reflected  in  their  lists. 
I  present  the  following  corrections  to  the  Pennsylvania  stonefly  list  based  on 
review  of  publications  that  included  PA  species  records  and  examination  of  ques- 
tionable species  believed  to  be  misidentifications.  Only  misidentifications  or 
species  listed  in  error  will  be  discussed  below.  An  annotated  species  list  is  pre- 
sented in  Table  1 . 

Capniidae:  Kondratieff  and  Kirchner  (1982)  described  Allocapniu  \\ru\i  as 
a  common  winter  stonefly  east  of  the  Appalachian  Mountains  ranging  from 
Maryland  to  Georgia.  Ross  and  Ricker  (1971)  described  A.  \\-rciyi  as  a  coastal 
plain  species.  A.  wrayi  was  added  to  the  Pennsylvania  stonefly  list  by  Masteller 


194  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


(1996a  and  b)  based  on  collections  from  3  streams,  two  east  and  one  west  of  the 
Appalachians.  Specimens  from  these  three  locations  have  been  examined  and 
determined  to  be  misidentifications  of  either  Allocapnia  pygmaea  (Burmeister) 
orAllocapnia  recta  (Claassen).  In  addition,  extensive  sampling  for  winter  stone- 
flies  throughout  Pennsylvania  has  not  yielded  any  additional  specimens  of  A. 
wrayi.  A.  wrayi  should,  therefore,  be  deleted  from  the  Pennsylvania  stonefly  list. 

Surdick  and  Kim  (1976)  listed  several  locations  for  Paracapnia  opis 
(Newman)  from  collections  made  in  1937.  For  many  years,  the  two  Paracapnia 
species  had  been  confused  and  described  under  several  names  until  the  descrip- 
tion of  Paracapnia  angulata  Hanson  in  1961  (Hitchcock  1974).  No  additional  P. 
opis  adults  have  been  identified  from  Pennsylvania;  therefore,  P.  opis  should  not 
be  considered  part  of  the  PA  stonefly  fauna. 

Leuctridae:  Surdick  and  Kim  (1976)  placed  Leuctra  carolinensis  on  the 
Pennsylvania  species  list  based  on  five  males  and  one  female  collected  from  one 
stream  in  Lackawanna  County  in  northeastern  Pennsylvania  in  1945. 1  examined 
these  specimens  and  identified  them  as  Leuctra  tenella  Provancher.  Masteller 
( 1996a)  added  an  additional  L.  carolinensis  record  based  on  collections  from  one 
stream  in  Tioga  County  in  northcentral  Pennsylvania  by  visiting  scientists  from 
the  southeastern  U.S.  where  L.  carolinensis  is  a  common  species.  L.  tenella  and 
L.  carolinensis  are  similar  species  that  have  been  confused  and  listed  in  error  in 
other  states  (Kondratieff  et  al.  1995).  Since  L.  carolinensis  is  considered  a  south- 
ern Appalachian  species  distributed  from  Maryland  south  to  South  Carolina 
(Stark  2001  and  Kondratieff  et  al.  1995)  and  no  additional  specimens  have  been 
discovered  in  Pennsylvania  after  many  years  of  sampling,  L.  carolinensis  should 
be  deleted  from  the  PA  list. 

Peltoperlidae:  Tallaperla  anna  was  added  to  the  Pennsylvania  list  in  error 
and  should  be  deleted.  T.  anna  is  restricted  to  the  southern  Appalachian  Moun- 
tains of  Virginia,  North  Carolina,  South  Carolina,  and  Georgia  (Stark  2000).  T. 
anna  was  included  on  the  Pennsylvania  species  list  in  Surdick  and  Kim  (1976) 
based  on  a  collection  from  one  stream  in  Luzerne  County  in  northeastern  Penn- 
sylvania in  1949.  Stark  (personal  communication)  believes  that  he  examined 
these  specimens  during  his  review  of  Tallaperla  and  identified  them  as  Talla- 
perla maria  (Needham  and  Smith).  The  National  Museum  of  Natural  History 
(Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  DC),  which  is  listed  as  the  repository  for 
the  Pennsylvania  specimen,  has  no  current  record  of  a  T.  anna  from  Pennsylvania 
(O.S.  Flint,  Smithsonian  Institution,  pers.  comm.).  No  additional  Tallaperla 
adults  have  been  identified  as  T.  anna  since  the  1949  collection.  Considering  the 
confirmed  limited  southern  distribution,  lack  of  additional  records,  and  the  diffi- 
culty of  separating  the  very  similar  Tallaperla  species,  T.  anna  should  be  delet- 
ed from  the  Pennsylvania  species  list. 

Tallaperla  elisa  was  also  added  to  the  Pennsylvania  list  in  error.  Masteller 
(1996a)  included  T.  elisa  on  his  Pennsylvania  stonefly  list  based  on  collections 
from  one  stream,  Lyman  Run,  Tioga  County  in  northcentral  Pennsylvania  by  vis- 
iting scientists  from  the  southern  Appalachians.  1  collected  several  male  Talla- 


Vol.  115,  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 195 

perla  from  Lyman  Run  and  several  nearby  streams  in  May  1 998,  all  of  which 
were  identified  as  T.  maria.  The  Lyman  Run  T.  elisa  specimens  were  reexamined 
by  the  original  collector  who  now  believes  that  they  are  T.  maria  (C.H.  Nelson, 
personal  communication).  T.  elisa  has  been  confirmed  from  only  high  elevation 
streams  along  the  North  Carolina  and  Tennessee  border  (Stark  2000  and  person- 
al communication).  Additionally,  Kondratieff  et  al  (1995)  considered  T.  elisa  to 
so  be  rare  through  its  range  as  to  be  considered  for  endangered  species  status. 
T.  elisa,  therefore,  should  be  deleted  from  the  Pennsylvania  species  list. 

Grubbs  (1997)  included  T.  elisa  as  part  of  the  stonefly  fauna  of  Maryland; 
however,  this  record  was  based  on  nymphs  and  exuvia  reported  from  one  Mary- 
land stream  in  Duffield  and  Nelson  (1993).  Since  Tallaperla  nymphs  cannot  be 
reliably  identified  to  species  and  Grubbs  did  not  collect  any  additional  specimens 
in  Maryland,  T.  elisa  should  not  be  considered  part  of  the  Maryland  fauna. 

Perlodidae:  Yugus  bulbosus  (Prison)  was  the  only  Pennsylvania  Yugus 
species  included  in  Masteller  (1996a).  The  revision  of  the  genus  by  Nelson 
(2001 )  described  two  new  species  in  the  Y.  bulbosus  complex.  Nelson  described 
the  distribution  of  Y.  bulbosus  as  the  southern  Appalachians  of  Georgia,  North 
Carolina,  and  Tennessee,  the  distribution  of  one  of  the  new  species,  Yugus  kon- 
dratieffi  Nelson,  as  Virginia  and  North  Carolina,  and  the  distribution  of  the  other 
new  species,  Yugus  kirchneri  Nelson,  as  Pennsylvania,  West  Virginia,  and  Virgin- 
ia. Yugus  adults  are  extremely  elusive;  the  only  confirmed  Pennsylvania  adult 
records  are  from  Powdermill  Run  in  Westmoreland  County  in  southwestern 
Pennsylvania  (Masteller  1996b),  which  Nelson  examined  and  confirmed  as  Y. 
kirchneri.  Nelson  confirmed  an  additional  Pennsylvania  record  for  Y.  kirchneri, 
a  nymph  collected  in  POTTER  COUNTY,  Bell  Branch  (41°29'00"N,  77°53' 
39" W),  14  May  1976. 

Pennsylvania  was  included  in  the  distribution  list  for  Yugus  arinus  (Prison)  in 
Stewart  and  Stark  (2002).  This  listing  is  believed  to  be  based  on  an  erroneous 
listing  in  Stark  et  al.  (1986)  and  was  deleted  by  Earle  (1994).  The  only  confirmed 
Pennsylvania  species  of  Yugus,  therefore,  should  be  Y.  kirchneri. 

Surdick  and  Kim  (1976)  listed  two  species  oflsogenoides:  Isogenoides  dora- 
tus  (Prison)  and  Isogenoides  hansoni  (Ricker)  in  Pennsylvania.  The  /.  doratus 
record  in  Surdick  and  Kim  (1976)  was  based  on  collections  by  Jennings  in  1942 
and  published  in  Prison  (1942).  Ricker  (1952)  described  a  new  species,  /.  han- 
soni, using  the  Jennings  Pennsylvania  specimens  and  location  as  the  holotype 
and  type  locality.  Ricker  (1952)  stated  that  /.  doratus  was  a  Midwestern  United 
States  species.  In  addition  to  the  above  two  Isogenoides  species,  Stark  (2001) 
and  Stewart  and  Stark  (2002)  also  included  Isogenoides  olivaceus  (Walker)  as 
part  of  the  Pennsylvania  fauna.  I  have  not  found  any  records  of  this  species  in 
Pennsylvania  in  the  literature  or  collections.  Ricker  (1952)  listed  the  distribution 
of/,  olivaceus  as  northern  Wisconsin,  Michigan,  Ontario  and  Quebec.  Minnesota 
is  the  only  additional  valid  state  record  for  this  species  in  Stewart  and  Stark 
(2002).  /.  hansoni  should  be  considered  the  only  valid  Isogenoides  species  in 
Pennsylvania. 


196  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Malirekus  was  considered  a  monotypic  genus  until  the  revision  by  Stark  and 
Szczytko  (1988)  that  established  a  new  species,  Malirekus  iroquois  Stark  and 
Szczytko.  They  considered  the  two  species  to  be  allopatric,  with  M.  hastatus  oc- 
curring in  the  southeastern  U.S.  and  M.  iroquois  in  the  northeastern  U.S.  and  Can- 
ada, but  cautioned  that  additional  specimens  from  the  mid-Atlantic  region  would 
need  to  be  examined  to  determine  the  north-south  limits  of  these  two  species. 
Grubbs  (1997)  did  not  find  any  M.  hastatus  in  Maryland  and  suggested  the  North 
Branch  Potomac  River  in  West  Virginia  as  the  northern  limit  of  M.  hastatus. 

The  only  published  Pennsylvania  record  of  M.  hastatus  is  from  the  Stroud 
Research  Center  in  Chester  County  Pennsylvania  (Masteller  1996b),  which  was 
a  reared  specimen  of  questionable  origin  (D.  Funk,  Stroud  Research  Center,  pers. 
comm.).  Malirekus  adults  are  rarely  collected;  however,  nymphs  are  regularly 
collected  from  small  streams  throughout  Pennsylvania.  No  adults  collected  so  far 
in  Pennsylvania  have  been  positively  identified  as  M.  hastatus.  Malirekus 
females  are  difficult  to  verify  without  examination  of  the  eggs;  however,  the  sub- 
genital  plates  of  the  Pennsylvania  females  are  consistent  with  M.  iroquois  (B.P. 
Stark  pers.  comm.).  All  nymphs  collected  so  far  in  Pennsylvania  have  lacked  the 
submental  gills  described  by  Stark  and  Szczytko  (1998)  as  present  on  nymphs  of 
southern  populations  of  M.  hastatus.  M.  hastatus  should,  therefore,  be  deleted 
from  the  PA  stonefly  list.  New  confirmed  Pennsylvania  records  of  M.  iroquois 
are  as  follows:  SULLIVAN  COUNTY,  Painter  Run  (41°19'22"N,  76°27'16"W), 
one  male,  May  29,  1977  (listed  as  M.  hastatus  in  Kondratieff  2004);  TIOGA 
COUNTY,  unnamed  tributary  to  Babb  Creek  at  old  village  of  Landrus  (41°38' 
20"N,  77°12'25"W),  one  late  instar  male  nymph  with  visible  genitalia,  June  16, 
1993;  WESTMORELAND  COUNTY,  Roaring  Run,  near  Camp  Alliquippa  (40° 
04'09"N,  79°20'39"W,  21  May  1997,  one  female. 

Pteronarcyidae:  Nelson  (2000)  in  Volume  I  of  the  series  Stoneflies  (Plecop- 
tera)  of  Eastern  North  America  listed  the  distribution  of  Pteronarcys  scotti  Rick- 
er,  one  of  the  six  Eastern  North  American  Pteronarcys  species,  as  Georgia,  North 
Carolina,  Pennsylvania,  South  Carolina,  Tennessee,  and  Virginia.  This  inclusion  of 
P.  scotti  as  part  of  the  Pennsylvania  fauna  was  based  on  Surdick  and  Kim  (1976) 
who  listed  a  record  of  P.  scotti  nymphs  from  one  Pennsylvania  stream.  Masteller 
( 1 996b)  reported  that  P.  scotti  was  added  in  error  and  he  did  not  include  it  in  his 
list  of  the  Pennsylvania  stonefly  fauna.  No  adult  P.  scotti  have  been  collected  in 
Pennsylvania  to  confirm  its  presence,  or  from  the  adjacent  states  of  Maryland  and 
West  Virginia  (Grubbs  1997).  P.  scotti  should,  therefore,  properly  be  considered 
a  southern  Appalachian  species  and  not  part  of  the  Pennsylvania  fauna. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  would  like  to  thank  Dr.  Bill  P.  Stark,  Mississippi  College,  for  verification  of  the  Neoperla  and 
Malirekus  identifications  and  review  of  the  manuscript,  and  Dr.  Boris  C.  Kondratieff,  Colorado  State 
University,  for  review  of  the  manuscript.  I  would  also  like  to  thank  the  Smithsonian  Institution, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  D.C.  for  loan  of  specimens.  Thanks  are  also 
expressed  to  three  anonymous  reviewers. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 197 

NOTE 

The  publication  of  Surdick  (2004)  after  the  completion  of  this  paper  resulted  in  a  change: 
Alloperla  petasata  Surdick  replaces  Alloperla  caudata  Prison  in  Pennsylvania.  The  species  list 
accompanying  this  paper  has  been  adjusted  accordingly. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

DeWalt,  R.  E.,  D.  W.  Webb,  and  A.  M.  Soli.  2002.  The  Neoperla  clymene  (Newman)  complex 
(Plecoptera:  Perlidae)  in  Illinois,  new  state  records,  distributions,  and  an  identification  key. 
Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  104:  126-137. 

Duffield,  R  .M.  and  C.  H.  Nelson.  1993.  Seasonal  changes  in  the  stonefly  (Plecoptera)  component 
of  the  diet  profile  of  trout  in  Big  Hunting  Creek,  Maryland,  USA.  Aquatic  Insects  15:  141-148. 

Earle,  J.  1994.  New  records  of  Stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  from  Pennsylvania.  Entomological  News 
105:  80-84. 

Ernst,  M.  R.,  B.  C.  Poulton,  and  K.  W.  Stewart.  1986.  Neoperla  (Plecoptera:  Perlidae)  of  the 
southern  Ozark  and  Ouachita  Mountain  region,  and  two  new  species  of  Neoperla.  Annals  of  the 
Entomological  Society  of  America  79:  645-661. 

Prison,  T.  H.  1942.  Studies  of  North  American  Plecoptera,  with  special  reference  to  the  fauna  of 
Illinois.  Bulletin  of  the  Illinois  Natural  History  Survey  22:  235-355. 

Grubbs,  S.  A.  1997.  New  records,  zoographic  notes,  and  a  revised  checklist  of  stoneflies  (Plecop- 
tera) from  Maryland.  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  123:  71-84. 

Grubbs,  S.  A.  and  B.  P.  Stark.  2001 .  Notes  on  Perlesta  (Plecoptera:  Perlidae)  from  Eastern  North 
America.  Aquatic  Insects  23:  119-122. 

Hitchcock,  S.  W.  1974.  Guide  to  the  insects  of  Connecticut.  Part  VII.  The  Plecoptera  or  Stoneflies 
of  Connecticut.  Bulletin  of  the  State  Geological  and  Natural  History  Survey  of  Connecticut,  107: 
1-262. 

Huntsman,  B.  ().,  R.  VV.  Baumann,  and  B.  C.  Kondratieff.  2001.  The  stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of 
South  Dakota.  Entomological  News  112:  104-1 1 1 . 

Kondratieff,  B.  C.  2004.  Perlodidae  -  Perlodinae  (The  Springflies).  pp.  149-180.  In.  B.P.  Stark  and 
B.  J.  Armitage  (Editors).  Stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  Eastern  North  America.  Volume  II.  Chloro- 
perlidae,  Perlidae,  and  Perlodidae  (Perlodinae).  Ohio  Biological  Survey.  Columbus,  Ohio,  U.S.A. 
192pp. 

Kondratieff,  B.  C.  and  R.  F.  Kirchner.  1982.  Notes  on  the  winter  stonefly  genus  Allocapnia 
(Plecoptera:  Capniidae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  84:  240-244. 

Kondratieff,  B.  C.,  R.  F.  Kirchner,  and  D.  R.  Lenat.  1995.  A  review  of  stonefly  records 
(Plecoptera:  Hexapoda)  of  North  Carolina  and  South  Carolina.  Brimleyana  23:  25-40. 

Masteller,  E.  C.  1996a.  New  records  of  stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  with  an  annotated  checklist  of  the 
species  for  Pennsylvania.  The  Great  Lakes  Entomologist  29:  107-120. 

Masteller,  E.  C.  1996b.  Plecoptera  Biodiversity  of  Pennsylvania.  Report  to  the  Pennsylvania  Wild 
Resources  Conservation  Fund.  Privately  printed,  E.  C.  Masteller,  The  Pennsylvania  State  Univer- 
sity at  Erie,  The  Behrend  College.  Erie,  Pennsylvania,  U.S.A.  2  Volumes. 

Nelson,  C.  H.  2000.  Pteronarcyidae  (The  Salmonflies).  pp.  29-39.  In.  B.P.  Stark  and  B..I.  Armitage 
(editors),  Stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  Eastern  North  America.  Volume  I.  Pteronarcyidae,  Peltoper- 
lidae,  and  Taeniopterygdidae.  Ohio  Biological  Survey.  Columbus,  Ohio,  U.S.A.  99  pp. 

Nelson,  C'.  II.  2001 .  The  Yugus  hulhosiis  complex,  with  a  comment  on  the  phylogenetic  position  of 
Yugus  within  the  Eastern  Perlodini  (Plecoptera:  Perlodidae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological 
Society  of  Washington  103:  601-619. 


198  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Nelson,  C.  H.  and  B  C.  Kondratieff.  1980.  Description  of  a  new  species  ofAlloperla  (Plecoptera: 
Chloroperlidae)  from  Virginia.  Journal  of  the  Kansas  Entomological  Society  53:  801-804. 

Ricker,  W.  E.  1952.  Systematic  studies  in  Plecoptera.  Indiana  University  Publications,  Science 
Series  18:  1-200. 

Ross,  H.  H.  and  W.  E.  Ricker.  1971.  The  classification,  evolution,  and  dispersal  of  the  winter 
stonefly  genus  Allocapnia.  University  of  Illinois  Biological  Monographs  45:  1-166. 

Stark,  B.  P.  1990.  Neoperla  clymene  revisited:  systematics  of  the  Nearctic  species  complexes 
(Plecoptera:  Perlidae).  pp.  299-310.  In,  Campbell,  I.  C.  (Editor).  Mayflies  and  Stoneflies:  Life 
Histories  and  Biology.  Proceedings  of  the  Fifth  International  Ephemeroptera  Conference  and  the 
9th  International  Plecoptera  Conference.  Kluwer  Academic  Publishers.  Dordrecht,  The  Nether- 
lands. 366  pp. 

Stark,  B.  P.  2001.  North  American  stonefly  list.  Updated  as  of  February  16,  2001.  http://www.mc. 
edu/campus/users/stark/Sfly0102.htm.  20  pp. 

Stark,  B.  P.  2000.  Peltoperlidae  (The  Roachflies).  pp.  41-54.  In.  B.  P.  Stark  and  B.  J.  Annitage 
(Editors).  Stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  Eastern  North  America.  Volume  I.  Pteronarcyidae,  Pelto- 
perlidae, and  Taeniopterygdidae.  Ohio  Biological  Survey.  Columbus,  Ohio,  U.S.A.  99  pp. 

Stark,  B.  P.  and  R.  W.  Baumann.  1978.  New  species  of  Nearctic  Neoperla  (Plecoptera:  Perlidae) 
with  notes  on  the  genus.  The  Great  Basin  Naturalist  38:  97-1 14. 

Stark,  B.  P.  and  S.  W.  Szczytko.  1988.  A  new  Malirekus  species  from  eastern  North  America 
(Plecoptera:  Perlodidae).  Journal  of  the  Kansas  Entomological  Society  61:  195-199. 

Stark,  B.  P.,  S.  W.  Szczytko,  and  R.  W.  Baumann.  1986.  North  American  Stoneflies  (Plecoptera): 
Systematics,  distribution,  and  taxonomic  references.  The  Great  Basin  Naturalist  46:  383-397. 

Stewart,  K.  W.  2000.  Taeniopterygidae  (The  Willowflies).  pp.  55-88.  In.  B.  P.  Stark  and  B.  J. 
Annitage  (Editors).  Stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  Eastern  North  America.  Volume  I.  Pteronarcyidae, 
Peltoperlidae,  and  Taeniopterygdidae.  Ohio  Biological  Survey.  Columbus,  Ohio,  U.S.A.  99  pp. 

Stewart,  K.W.  and  B.  P.  Stark.  2002.  Nymphs  of  North  American  Stonefly  Genera  (Plecoptera). 
2nd  Edition.  The  Caddis  Press.  Columbus,  Ohio,  U.S.A.  510  pp. 

Surdick,  R.  F.  2004.  Chloroperlidae  (The  Sallflies).  /;;  B.P.  Stark  and  B.J.  Armitage,  (eds.).  Stone- 
flies  (Plecoptera)  of  Eastern  North  America.  Volume  II.  Chloroperlidae,  Perlidae,  and  Perlodidae 
(Perlodinae).  Ohio  Biological  Survey,  Columbus,  Ohio.  192  pp. 

Surdick,  R.  F.  and  K.  C.  Kim.  1976.  Stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  Pennsylvania.  A  synopsis.  Pennsyl- 
vania State  University  Agricultural  Experimental  Station  Bulletin  808:  9-73. 

Woods,  A.  J.,  J.  M.  Omernick,  D.  D.  Brown,  and  C.  W.  Kiilsgaard.  1996.  Level  III  and  IV 
Ecoregions  of  Pennsylvania  and  the  Blue  Ridge  Mountains,  the  Ridge  and  Valley,  and  the  Central 
Appalachian  of  Virginia,  West  Virginia,  and  Maryland.  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency, 
National  Health  and  Environmental  Effects  Laboratory.  Corvallis,  Oregon,  U.S.A.  50  pp. 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 


199 


Table  1.  Annotated  list  of  the  134  Pennsylvania  stonefly  species. 


Capniidae 

Allocapnia  aurora  Ricker 

Allocapnia  curiosa  Prison 

Allocapnia  frisoni  Ross  and  Ricker 

Allocapnia  gramilata  (Claassen) 

Allocapnia  harperi  Kirchner 

Allocapnia  maria  Hanson 

Allocapnia  nivicola  (Fitch) 

Allocapnia  pechumani  Ross  and  Ricker 

Allocapnia  pygmaea  (Burmeister) 

Allocapnia  recta  (Claassen) 

Allocapnia  rickeri  Prison 

Allocapnia  simmonsi  Kondratieff  and  Voshell 

Allocapnia  vivipara  (Claassen) 

Allocapnia  :ola  Ricker 

Paracapnia  angulata  Hanson 

Leuctridae 

Leuctra  alexanderi  Hanson 
Leuctra  duplicate  Claassen 
Leuctra  ferruginea  ( Walker) 
Leuctra  grandis  Banks 
Leuctra  maria  Hanson 
Leuctra  sibleyi  Claassen 
Leuctra  tenella  Provancher 
Leuctra  tennis  (Pictet) 
Leuctra  truncata  Claassen 
Leuctra  variabilis  Hanson 
Paraleuctra  sura  (Claassen) 
Megaleuctra  flint i  Baumann 

Nemouridae 

Amphinemura  appalachia  Baumann 
Amphinemura  delosa  (Ricker) 
Amphinemura  linda  (Ricker) 
Amphinemura  nigritta  (Provancher) 
Amphinemura  wui  (Claassen) 
Nemoura  trispinosa  Claassen 
Ostrocerca  alhidipennis  (Walker) 
Ostrocerca  complexa  (Claassen) 
Ostrocerca  prolongata  (Claassen) 
Ostrocerca  truncata  (Claassen) 
Paranemoura  perfecta  (Walker) 
Prostoia  completa  (Walker) 
Prostoia  similis  (Hagen) 
Soyedina  carolinensis  Claassen 
Sovedina  merritti  Baumann  and  Grubbs 
Soyedina  vallicularia  (Wu) 
Soyedina  washingtoni  (Claassen) 


Taeniopterygidae 

Bolotoperla  rossi  (Prison) 

Oemopteryx  contorta  (Needham  and  Claassen) 

Strophopteryx  appalachia  Ricker  and  Ross 

Strophopteryx  fasciata  ( Burmeister) 

Taenionema  atlanticum  Ricker  and  Ross 

Taeniopteryx  burksi  Ricker  and  Ross 

Taeniopteryx  maura  (Pictet) 

Taeniopteryx  metequi  Ricker  and  Ross 

Taeniopteryx  nivalis  (Fitch) 

Taeniopteryx  parvula  Banks 

Taeniopteryx  ugola  Ricker  and  Ross 

Peltoperlidae 

Peltoperla  arcuata  Needham 
Tallaperla  maria  (Needham  and  Smith) 

Chloroperlidae 

Alloperla  aracoma  Harper  and  Kirchner 

Alloperla  atlantica  Baumann 

Alloperla  biserrata  Nelson  and  Kondratieff 

Alloperla  chloris  Prison 

Alloperla  concolor  Ricker 

Alloperla  imbecilla  (Say) 

Alloperla  petasata  Surdick 

Alloperla  usa  Ricker 

Alloperla  vostoki  Ricker 

Haploperla  brevis  (Banks) 

Rasvena  terna  (Prison) 

Suwallia  marginata  (Banks) 

Sweltsa  later -alls  (Banks) 

Sweltsa  naica  (Provancher) 

Sweltsa  onkos  (Ricker) 

Utaperla  gaspesiana  Harper  and  Roy 

Pcrlidae  -  Acroneuriinae 

Acroneuria  abnormis  (Newman) 
Acroneuria  arenosa  (Pictet) 
Acroneuria  arida  (Hagen) 
Acroneuria  carolinensis  (Banks) 
Acroneuria  evoluta  Klapalck 
Acroneuria  ft  lids  Prison 
Acroneuria  frisoni  Stark  and  Brown 
Acroneuria  lycorias  (Newman) 
Attaneuria  ruralis  (Hagen) 
Eccoptura  xanthenes  (Newman) 
Hansonoperla  appalachia  Nelson 
Perlesta  decipiens  (Walsh) 
Pcrlcsta  nelsoni  Stark 


200 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Perlesta  nitida  Banks 

Perlesta  placida  (Hagen) 

Perlesta  teasyia  Kirchner  and  Kondratieff 

Perlinella  drymo  (Newman) 

Perlinella  ephyre  (Newman) 

Perlidae  -  Perlinae 

Neoperla  catharae  Stark  and  Baumann 
Neoperla  choctaw  Stark  and  Baumann 
Neoperla  clymene  (Newman) 
Neoperla  occipitalis  (Pictet) 
Neoperla  robisoni  Poulton  and  Stewart 
Neoperla  stewarti  Stark  and  Baumann 
Agnetina  anmilipes  (Hagen) 
Agnetina  capita tu  (Pictet) 
Agnetina  flavescens  (Walsh) 
Paragnetina  immarginata  (Say) 
Paragnetina  media  (Walker) 

Perlodidae  -  Isoperlinae 

Clioperla  clio  (Newman) 

Isoperla  bilineata  (Say) 

Isoperla  dicala  Prison 

Isoperla  francesca  Harper 

Isoperla  frisoni  Illes 

Isoperla  holochlora  (Klapalek) 

Isoperla  lat a  Prison 

Isoperla  marly nia  (Needham  and  Claassen) 


Isoperla  montana  (Banks) 
Isoperla  namata  Prison 
Isoperla  nana  (Walsh) 
Isoperla  orata  Prison 
Isoperla  richardsoni  Prison 
Isoperla  signata  (Banks) 
Isoperla  similis  (Hagen) 
Isoperla  slossonae  (Banks) 
Isoperla  transmarina  (Newman) 

Perlodidae  -  Perlodinae 

Cultus  decisus  decisus  (Walker) 
Cultus  verticalis  (Banks) 
Diploperla  duplicata  (Banks) 
Diploperla  robusta  Stark  and  Gaufin 
Remenus  bilobatus  (Needham  and  Claassen) 
Helopicus  subvarians  (Banks) 
Isogenoides  hansom  (Ricker) 
Malirekits  iroquois  Stark  and  Szczytko 
Yiigus  kirchneri  Nelson 

Pteronarcyidae 

Pteronarcys  biloba  Newman 
Pteronarcvs  comstocki  Smith 
Pteronarcys  dorsata  (Say) 
Pteronarcys  pictetii  Hagen 
Pteronarcvs  proteus  Newman 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 201 

FIFTY-THREE  SPECIES  OF  TETRIGOIDEA 

(ORTHOPTERA)  FROM  CENWANG  MOUNTAIN  IN  THE 

WESTERN  GUANGXI  ZHUANG  AUTONOMOUS 

REGION,  CHINA1 

Guo-Fang  Jiang2  and  Ge-Qiu  Liang' 

ABSTRACT:  In  this  paper,  we  provide  a  checklist  of  53  species  of  Tetrigoidea  ground  grasshoppers 
(Cladonotidae,  Scelimenidae,  Metrodoridae  and  Tetrigidae)  from  Cenwang  Mountain,  the  natural 
reserve  located  near  Tianlin  County  in  the  west  Guangxi  Zhuang  Autonomous  Region  of  southwest- 
em  China.  In  addition,  the  female  Macromotettix  serrifemoralis  Zheng  et  Jiang  and  the  male  Tetrix 
ruyuanensis  Liang  are  described  for  the  first  time. 

KEY  WORDS:  Tetrigoidea,  Cenwang  Mountain,  Western  Guangxi  Zhuang  Autonomous  Region, 
China,  Macromotettix  serrifemoralis  female,  Tetrix  ruyuanensis  male 

Cenwang  Mountain  is  a  forested  resort  area  (2,060  meters  elevation)  near 
Tianlin  County,  approximately  40  kilometers  north  of  the  city  of  Baise  in  the 
west  Guangxi  Zhuang  Autonomous  Region  of  southwestern  China.  The  climate 
is  subtropical,  frosts  are  rare,  and  rainfall  averages  around  1,300  mm  annually. 
Average  temperatures  range  from  20.6°C  in  July  to  4.7°C  in  January  (Forestry 
Department  of  Guangxi,  1993).  The  vegetation  zone  is  subtropical  mountain 
broadleaf  evergreens  (Forestry  Department  of  Guangxi,  1993).  Vertical  changes 
in  the  climate  are  clear  because  the  mountain  is  large  and  steep.  The  overstory 
vegetation  in  the  upper  region  (over  1,800  meters)  of  the  mountain,  where  the 
collections  were  made,  consists  largely  of  secondary  growth  trees,  Quercus  nu- 
bium,  Fagus  lucida  (both  in  the  Fagaceae)  and  Liquidambar  acalycina  (Hama- 
melidaceae).  The  vegetation  in  the  lower  side  of  the  mountain  is  very  complex, 
being  composed  of  subtropical  middle  mountain  mixed  broadleaf  evergreen  and 
deciduous  forest  (Forestry  Department  of  Guangxi,  1993). 

The  53  species  of  Tetrigoidea  reported  herein  were  collected  from  grassy  veg- 
etation near  roadsides  using  a  sweep  net  between  27  May  -  5  June  2002  and  14- 
16  August  2002.  The  locations  visited  included  the  Linao  Hill,  Weihuo  Hill,  Cen- 
wang Hill,  Yaojiawan  Hill,  Dadong  Hill,  Langping,  Jiudongping  and  Laoshan 
Tree  Farm. 

The  specimens  were  deposited  at  the  College  of  Life  Sciences,  Nanjing 
Normal  University  (Nanjing),  and  at  the  Institute  of  Entomology,  Zhongshan 
University  (Guangzhou). 


1  Received  on  April  4,  2004.  Accepted  on  September  17,  2004. 

:Jiangsu  Key  Laboratory  for  Bioresource  Technology,  College  of  Life  Sciences,  Nanjing  Normal 
University,  Nanjing  210097  People's  Republic  of  China.  E-mail:  cnjgfl208fahotmail.com. 

'Institute  of  Entomology,  Zhongshan  University,  Guangzhou  510275,  People's  Republic  of  China. 
E-mail:  lianggeqiufazsu.edu.cn. 

Mailed  on  February  3,  2005 


202  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


List  of  species  of  Tetrigoidea  from  the  Cenwang  Mountain, 
Western  Guangxi  Zhuang  Autonomous  Region,  China 

Taxa  are  listed  alphabetically  within  each  family.  For  each  species  listed,  except  Tetrix  niyuanen- 
sis  Liang  and  Macromotettix  serrifemoralis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  the  data  is  organized  as  follows:  scien- 
tific name,  author  and  year,  number  of  males  and  females,  dates,  as  well  as  collection  localities.  The 
asterisk  "*"  represents  records  that  have  been  reported  elsewhere  in  China. 

Cladonotidae 

Deltonotus g uangxiensis  Liang  et  Jiang,  2004.  Id1,  29  14-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,400  meter 
elevation);  3Cf,  19  Weihuo  Hill  (1,600m);  ICf,  29  Cenwang  Hill  (1,600- 1800m) 

Pseudopltettix  linaoshanensis  Liang  et  Jiang,  2004.  3d",  ?9  14-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill 
(1,400m);  19  Weihuo  Hill  (1,600m);  19  Yaojiawan  Hill  (1,200- 1,400m) 

Scelimenidae 

Criotettix bispinosus  (Dalman,  1818).  5Cf,  29  27  May  5  June  2002,  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m);  Id",  39 
Langping(  1,200- 1,300m) 

Criotettix  curvispinus  Zheng,  1993.  39  27  May-5  June  2002,  Yaojiawan  Hill  ( 1,200- 1,400m) 

Eucriotettix  oculatm  (Bolivar,  1898).  4Cf,  29  27  May-5  June  2002,  14-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill 
( 1 ,400m);  3Cf ,  59Linao  Hill  ( 1 ,200- 1 ,400m);  2cf ,  69Dadong  Hill  ( 1 ,400m);  4Cf ,  1 9  Weihuo  Hill 
(1,300m);  39  Langping  (1,200- 1,300m);  4Cf  Jiudongping  ( 1,200- 1,300m) 

Scelimena  melli  Gunther,  1937.  icf,  39  27  May-5  June  2002,  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m) 

Thoradonta  lativertex  Gunther,  1938.  3cf,  49  14-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,400m);  2cf,  89 
Weihuo  Hill  (1,300m);  4CT,  19  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m);  2Cf,  59  Langping  (1,200m);  2Cf  Jiudong- 
ping (1,200- 1,300m) 

Thoradonta  transpicula  Zheng,  1996.  2cf,  19  27  May-5  June  2002,  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m) 

Thoradonta  yunnana  Zheng,  1981.  2cf  27  May-5  June  2002,  14-16  August  2002,  Weihuo  Hill 
( 1 ,300m);  1  Cf ,  29  Linao  Hill  ( 1 ,400m) 

Zhengitettix  hainanensis  Liang,  1994.  2Cf,  49  27  May-5  June  2002,  14-16  August  2002,  Dadong 
Hill  (1,400m);  icf,  39  Linao  Hill  (1,400m);  5Cf,  29  Weihuo  Hill  (1,300m);  2cf,  19  Jiudongping 
(l,200-l,300m) 

*  Zhengitettix  obliquspicula  Zheng  et  Jiang.  29  27  May-5  June  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,200- 1,400m); 
ICf,  19  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m) 

Metrodoridae 

Bolivaritettix  circinihumerus  Zheng,  2003.  7Cf ,  29  27  May-5  June  2002,  Langping  ( 1 ,200- 1 ,300m) 

Bolivaritettix  circocephalus  Zheng,  1992.  4Cf  14-16  August  2002,  Jiudongping  (1,200- 1,300m); 
2Cf,  l9Weihuo  Hill  (1,300m) 

Bolivaritettix  fanjingshanensis  Zheng,  1992.  3d",  29  14-16  August  2002,  Jiudongping  (1,200- 
1,300m) 

Bolivaritettix  glnuntianus  (Hancock,  1915).  4Cf,  59  14-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,400m);  2cf, 
19  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m);  39  Langping  (1,200m) 

Bolivarite ttix  guibeiensis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  1994.  6Cf,  1 9  14-16  August  2002,  27  May  -5  June  2002, 
Weihuo  Hill  (1,300m);  2d",  39  Linao  Hill,  1400m;  5cT,  29  Jiudongping  (1,200- 1,300m);  39,  79 
Langping  ( 1 ,200m) 

Bolivaritettix  humerlis  Gunther,  1939.  3cf,  19  27  May  5  June  2002.  14-16  August  2002,  Cenwang 
Hill  (1,500- 1,800m);  2cf,  59Langping  (1,200- 1,300m);  4Cf,  29  Linao  Hill  (1,400m);  1 9 
Jiudongping  ( 1 ,200- 1 ,300m) 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 203 

Bolivaritettix  javanicus  (Bolivar,  1909).  2Cf    14-16  August  2002,  Weihuo  Hill  ( 1 .600m) 

Bolivaritettix  lativertex  (Brunner  von  VVattenwyl,  1893).  39  14-16  August  2002,  27  May-5  June 
2002,  Jiudongping  (1,300m);  2cf.  19  We  ill  no  Hill  (l,60()m):  3cf.  49  Dadong  Hill  (l,40()m) 

Bolivaritettix  longzhouensis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  1995.  2Cf,  19  14-16  August  2002,  Weihuo  Hill  (1,600m); 
ICf,  49  Cenwang  Hill  (1,400- 1,800m) 

Bolivaritettix  nigritibialis  Zheng,  2002.  2cf.  4927  May  -5  June  2002,  Langping  (1,200- 1,300m) 
Bolivaritettix  sikkinensis  (Bolivar,  1909).  2cf,  69  14-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,400m) 

*  BolivaritettLx  tianlinensis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  2004.  ICf,  29  27  May-5  June  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,400m) 

Bolivaritettix  yuanbaoshanensis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  1995.  4cf,  39  14-16  August  2002,  27  May  5  June 
2002,  Linao  Hill  (1400m);  3cf,  19  Laoshan  Tree  Farm  (1,200- 1,600m);  2Cf  Jiudongping  (1,200- 
1,300m);  4Cf,  19  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m);  2Cf,  29  Cenwang  Hill  (1,400- 1,800m);  Id,  1<?  Weihuo 
Hill  (1,300m) 

Macromotettix  serrifemoralis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  2002.  3d".  1 9  14-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill  ( 1 ,400m) ; 
59  Jiudongping  (1,200- 1,300m)  ;  6Cf,  29  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m)  ;  2Cf,  l9Weihuo  Hill  (1,600m)  ; 
4CT,  29Cenwang  Hill  (1,400- 1,800m)  ;  3d1,  2V  Yaojiawan  Hill  (1,200- 1,400m)  ;  4cf,  69  Laoshan 
Tree  Farm  (1,400- 1,700m).  Female  described  in  next  section. 

Macromotettix  tianlinensis  Liang  et  Jiang,  2004.  10914-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1.400m);  1 9 
Jiudongping  (1,200- 1,300m);  19  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m) 

Macromotettix  tonilosinota  Zheng  et  Jiang,  1998.  2cf .  49  27  May-5  June  2002,  Linao  Hill  ( 1 ,400m); 
3Cf,  29  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m) 

Mazarredia  huanjiangensis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  1994.  2Cf,  29  27  May-5  June  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,400m) 
Mazarredia  longipennis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  2004.  3cf  27  May-5  June  2002,  Linao  Hill  (l,40()m) 
Systolederus  fujiangsis  Zheng,  1993.  2Cf,  19  27  May-5  June  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1.400m) 

Systolederus guangxiensis  Zheng,  1998.  ICf,  19  27  May-5  June  2002,  14-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill 
(1.400m);  2Cf,  49  Jiudongping  (1,200- 1,300m);  ICf,  39  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m) 

*  Systolederus  longipennis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  2004.  2cf  27  May-5  June  2002,  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m) 

*  Systolederus  tianlinensis  Jiang  et  Liu,  2004.  ICf.  19  27  May-5  June  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,400m) 

Xistra  longidorsalis  Liang  et  Jiang,  2004.  79  14-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,400m);  ICf  Dadong 
Hill  (1,400m) 

Tetrigidae 

*  Bannatettix  tianlinensis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  2004.  29  27  May-5  June  2002,  Linao  Hill  1 1.200-  1.400m) 

Ceperoi cltinensis  Liang,  1998.  ICf,  4914-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,400m);  5Cf,  29  Cenwang  Hill 
(1,600- 1,800m);  29  Dadong  Hill  ( 1,400m);  ICf  Weihuo  Hill  (1,300m);  ICf.  39  Jiudongping  (1,200- 
1,300m) 

Coptotettix  fossulatus  Bolivar,  1887.  3Cf.  19  27  May-5  June  2002,  Weihuo  Hill  (1.300m) 
Coptotettix  gongshanensis  Zheng,  1992.  3Cf,  29  27  May-5  June  2002,  Langping  (1,200- 1,300m) 
Ergatettix  brachypterus  Zheng,  1993.  4Cf,  19  27  May  5  June  2002.  Cenwang  Hill  ( 1 .500-l,800m) 
Euparatettix  variabilis  (Bolivar,  1887).  6Cf,  79  14-16  August  2002,  Linao  Hill  (1,400m) 
Formosatettix guangdongensis  Liang,  1991.  6Cf,  K9  27  May  5  June  2002.  Linao  Hill  I  l.4(>(>m) 
Formosatettix yunnanensis  Zheng,  1992.  3d",  69  27  May-5  June  2002.  Cem\ang  Hill  (l.SOOm) 
Teredorus  albimarginus  Zheng  et  Zhou,  1996.  2Cf,  59  27  May  5  June  2002,  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m) 

Tetrix  bolivari  Saulcy,  1901.  39  27  May  5  June  2002,  Weihuo  Hill  (1.300m);  4tf.l9  Linao  Hill 
(1.400m);  2Cf,l9  Linao  Hill  ( 1. 200- 1,400m);  2Cf  Dadong  Hill  (1.400m);  3d",  29  Yaojiawan  Hill 
(1,200- 1.400m) 


204  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


*  Tetrix  cenwanglaoshana  Zheng  et  Jiang,  2004.  29  27  May-5  June  2002,  Cenwang  Hill  (1,500- 
1,800m) 

Tetrix  guangxiensis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  1996.  3Cf,  29  27  May-5  June  2002,  Weihuo  Hill  (1,300m);  3d1, 
89  Linao  Hill  (1,400m) ;  7cf,  69  Linao  Hill  (1,200- 1,400m) ;  5cf,  29  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m);  2Cf, 
69  Langping  (1,200- 1,300m) 

Tetrix  japonica  (Bolivar,  1887).  18CT,  239  27  May-5  June  2002,  14-16  August  2002,  Cenwang  Hill 
(1,500- 1,800m);  12cf,159  Weihuo  Hill  (1,300m);  6Cf,  89  Linao  Hill  (1,400m);  9cf,  109  Linao 
Hill  (1,200- 1,400m);  14Cf,  69  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m);  7Cf,  89  Langping  (1,200m);  16CT,  109 
Jiudongping  (1,200- 1,300m) 

Tetrix  ruyuanensis  Liang,  1998.  6Cf,  4914-16  August  2002,  Cenwang  Hill  (1,500-1, 800m);  2cf,  19 
Weihuo  Hill  (l,300-l,600m);  3cf,  29  Langping  ( 1,200- 1,300m);  9Cf,  59  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m); 
lOCf  Yaojiawan  Hill  (1,200-1, 400m);  2Cf,  19  Laoshan  Tree  Farm  ( 1,400-  1,700m) 

Tetrix  subulata  (Linnaeus,  1761).  3Cf,  29  27  May-5  June  2002,  Linao  Hill  ( 1,200- 1,400m);  icf.  19 
Dadong  Hill  (1,400m) 

Jetr'ix  tenuicornis  (Sahlberg,  1893).  2cf,  49  27  May-5  June  2002,  Cenwang  Hill  (1,500- 1,700m) 
Tetrix  tinkiliami  Zheng  et  Liang,  1998.  3Cf,  19  27  May-5  June  2002,  Dadong  Hill  (1,400m) 
Tetrix  tubercarina  Zheng  et  Jiang,  1994.  3Cf,  19  27  May-5  June  2002,  Langping  (1,200- 1,300m) 
Tetrix yunnanensis  Zheng,  1992.  3Cf,  59  27  May-5  June  2002,  Langping  ( l,200-l,300m) 


Descriptions  of  female  Macromotettix  serrifemoralis  Zheng  et  Jiang 
and  male  Tetrix  ruyuanensis  Liang 

The  female  Macromotettix  serrifemoralis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  1998  and  the  male 
Tetrix  ruyuanensis  Liang  2002  were  not  reported  in  the  original  description  and  are 
described  below  for  the  first  time. 

Macromotettix  serrifemoralis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  2002  (Fig.  1 ) 
Female:  Body  small  and  dark  brown.  Pronotum  between  humeral  angles  with  two  slanting  white 
spots.  Wings  black.  Outside  of  hind  femur  brown  ,  lower  side  black.  Hind  tibiae  dark  brown,  with  two 
light  transverse  spots.  Body  length,  9  mm;  pronotum  length,  6.8  mm;  hind  femur  length,  6  mm. 

Head  slightly  projecting  above  pronotum.  Width  of  vertex  slightly  narrower  than  the  width  of  an 
eye;  lateral  margins  slightly  turn  out  forward;  anterior  margin  round;  median  carina  obvious;  in  profile, 
frontal  costa  protruding  between  the  antennaes  distinctly;  the  width  of  longitudinal  sulcus  slightly  nar- 
rower than  the  width  of  coxa  of  antennae.  Antennae  filiform,  lying  between  lower  ridge  of  eyes.  Eyes 
globose,  projecting.  Lateral  ocelli  placed  on  the  middle  part  of  anterior  margins  of  eyes.  Disc  of  prono- 
tum with  numerous  tubercles,  anterior  margin  straight;  median  carina  distinct,  in  profile,  upper  margin 
of  pronotum  before  and  behind  transverse  sulci  swelling  upwards,  the  part  behind  the  second  swelling 
nearly  straight;  laterior  carinae  short,  reduce  postward  on  the  prozona;  humeral  angle  obtuse  angle 
shaped,  the  part  between  them  with  two  short  longitudinal  carinae;  hind  process  of  pronotum  long  cone- 
shaped,  apex  not  reaching  the  tee  of  hind  femur,  apex  sharp.  Posterior  angles  of  the  lateral  lobes  of 
pronotum  truncate;  posterior  margin  of  lateral  lobes  with  two  concaves.  Elytra  wide  ovate,  apex  round- 
ed. Wings  developed,  reaching  the  apex  of  hind  process  of  pronotum.  Lower  margins  of  fore  and  mid- 
dle femur  straight;  width  of  midfemur  narrower  than  width  of  see  parts  of  elytra.  Length  of  hind  femur 
about  3.2  times  longer  than  the  width,  median  keel  of  upper  side  with  distinct  fine  teeth,  preknec  teeth 
before  the  knee  acute  angulate,  knee  teeth  angulate.  Outer  side  of  hind  tibia  with  6  thorns,  inner  side 
with  5  thorns.  Length  of  first  segment  of  hind  tarsus  longer  than  the  third.  Ovipositor  narrow  and  long, 
upper  and  lower  ovipositors  with  slender  teeth.  Length  of  subgenital  plate  longer  than  wide,  with  a 
small  triangle  bulge  in  the  middle  of  posterior  margin. 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 


205 


Specimens  Examined:    19<  27  May  2002,  Guangxi:  Tianlin  (Jiudongping  ),  1200m,  collected  by 
Jiang  Guo-Fang. 


Fig.  1  Macromotettix  serrifemoralis  Zheng  et  Jiang,  female  whole  body,  lateral  view.  Body 
is  9  mm  long. 


Tetrix  ruyuanensis  Liang,  1998  (Fig.  2) 

Male:  Body  small,  dark  brown,  with  tubercles.  Body  length,  7  mm;  pronotum  length,  7.5  mm;  hind 
femur  length,  5.5  mm. 

Head  not  projecting  above  pronotum.  Anterior  margin  of  vertex  arched,  slightly  protruding  beyond 
eyes,  its  width  about  1.6  times  wider  than  the  width  of  an  eye;  median  carina  obvious,  two  sides  on  the 
midian  carina  slightly  concave,  lateral  ridge  slightly  raising  on  the  apex.  Front  slanting,  in  profile,  ver- 
tex forming  ocute  angles  with  frontal  costa.  Parts  before  lateral  ocelli  not  concave,  protruding  archedly 
between  antennae;  longitudinal  furrow  deep,  lateral  ridge  gradually  expands  from  the  part  above  later- 
al ocelli  to  the  median  ocellus,  width  of  longitudinal  furrow  between  antennae  as  wide  as  of  the  coxa  of 
antennae.  Lateral  ocelli  placed  on  the  middle  of  anterior  margins  of  eyes.  Antennae  filiform,  lying 
between  lower  ridge  of  eyes,  with  14  articles,  length  of  an  article  about  5  times  larger  than  the  width  of 
middle  ones  of  antennae.  Eyes  globose.  Anterior  margin  of  pronotum  slightly  straight;  disc  of  pronotum 
between  transverse  sulcus  swelling  by  small  hillock,  upper  margin  of  pronotum  straight  behind  shoul- 
ders, hind  process  of  pronotum  cone-shaped,  reaching  the  knee  of  hind  femur;  median  carina  swelling 
taking  slightly  thin  in  shape,  laterior  carinae  parallel  on  the  prozona,  prozona  similar  to  square  shape, 
part  between  humeral  angles  without  short  longitudinal  keel;  humeral  angle  close  to  arc  shape.  Posterior 
margin  of  lateral  lobes  of  pronotum  with  two  concaves;  posterior  angles  downward,  apex  of  angles 
round.  Elytra  long  ovate.  Wings  developed,  reaching  the  apex  of  pronotum.  Upper  margins  of  fore 
femur  and  midfemur  slightly  bending,  and  lower  margins  slightly  undulate;  width  of  midfemur  slightly 
wider  than  the  width  of  visible  part.  Hind  femur  short  and  stranger,  its  length  about  2.8  times  larger  than 
the  width,  median  keels  of  upper  and  lower  sides  with  slender  teeth.  Outer  side  of  hind  tibia  with  9 
spines,  inner  sides  with  8  spines,  tip  wider  than  base  slightly.  Length  of  first  article  of  hind  tarsus  longer 
than  the  third  distinctly;  the  first  and  second  pulvilli  below  the  first  tarsus  small,  triangle,  tip  sharp;  the 
third  large,  similar  to  rectangle,  tip  blunt. 

Specimens  Examined:  ICf.  1  .lime  2002,  Guangxi:  Tianlin  (Dadong  Hill),  1400m,  collected  by 
Jiang  Guo-Fang. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  authors  are  grateful  to  Mr.  Liu  Jiangwen  for  collecting  some  of  the  amount  specimens.  This 
work  was  supported  by  a  grant  from  the  Comprehensive  Investigation  Foundation  of  Cenwanglaoshan 
Nature  Reservation  of  Guangxi,  China. 


206 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Fig.  1  Tetrix  ruyuanensis  Liang,  male  whole  body,  lateral  view.  Body  is  7  mm  long. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Forestry  Department  of  Guangxi.  1993.  The  Natural  Reserve  of  Guangxi.  China  Forestry  Press. 
Beijing,  China.  320  pp.  (in  Chinese) 

Giinther,  K.  1938.  Revision  der  Acrydiinae.  II.  Scelimenae  spuriae.  Stettner  Entomologische  Zeitung  99: 
117-148,  161-230. 

Gunther,  K.  1939.  Revision  der  Acrydiinae  III.  Section  Amorphopi  (Metrodorae  Bol.  1887  auct.). 
Abhandlungen  und  Beriche  der  Museum  fur  Tierkunde  und  Velkerkunde  zur  Dresden  (A)  20:  1-335. 

Jiang,  G.-F.  and  Z.-M.  Zheng.  1998.  Grasshoppers  and  Locusts  from  Guangxi.  pp.  263-390.  In, 
Guangxi.  Normal  University  Press.  Guilin,  China.  390  pp.  (in  Chinese) 

Liang,  G.-Q.  1995.  A  new  genus  and  a  new  species  of  Scelimemnidae  from  Hainan,China  (Orthoptera: 
Tetrigoidea).  pp.  33-34.  In,  Lian  Zhen-Min.  Entomology  Resesarch  No.l.  Shaanxi  Normal  University 
Press,  Xi'an.  China.  239  pp.  (in  Chinese) 

Liang,  G.-Q.  and  G.-F.  Jiang,  2004.  Four  new  species  of  Tetrigoidea  from  Tianlin  County,  Guangxi, 
South  China  (Orthoptera).  Acta  Zootaxonomica  29(  1 ):  115-1 20. 

Liang,  G.-Q.  and  Z.-M.  Zheng.  1998.  Orthoptera,Tetrigoidea.  pp.  11-278.  //;.  Fauna  Sinica.  Insecta.  12. 
Science  Press.  Beijing,  China.  290  pp.  (in  Chinese) 

Zheng,  Z.-M.  1993.  Orthoptera:  Tetrigoidea.  pp.  74-75,  80-81.  In.  Huang,  Chun-Mei  (Editor).  Animals  of 
Longqi  Mountain.  China  Foresty  Press.  Beijing,  China.  1105  pp.  (in  Chinese) 

Zheng,  Z.-M.  and  G.-F.  Jiang.  1994.  A  survey  of  Tetrigoidea  from  Huanjiang  Area,  North  of  Guangxi 
(Orthoptera).  Journal  of  the  Guangxi  Academy  of  Sciences  10(1):  86-87.  (in  Chinese) 

Zheng,  Z.-M.  and  G.-F.  Jiang.  2002.  One  new  genus  and  seven  new  species  of  Tetrigoidea  from 
Southern  Region  of  Guangxi.  Zoological  Research,  23(5):  409-416.  (in  Chinese) 

Zheng,  Z.-M.  and  G.-F.  Jiang.  2002.  A  study  on  the  genus  Macromotcttix  Gunther  (Orthoptera: 
Tetrigoidea:  Metrodoridae)  from  China.  Entomotaxonomia  24(4):  235-238.  (in  Chinese) 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 207 

DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  MALE  OF  VAEJOVIS  CHISOS 

SISSOM  (SCORPIONES,  VAEJOVIDAE)  FROM  TEXAS, 

U.S.A.,  WITH  COMMENTS  ON  MORPHOMETRIC  AND 

MERISTIC  VARIATION  IN  THE  SPECIES' 

Lee  R.  Jarvis,2  W.  David  Sissom,2  and  Richard  IS.  Henson1 

ABSTRACT:  The  scorpion  Vaejovis  chisos  Sissom,  1990,  is  redescribed,  based  on  the  collection  of 
three  males  and  a  number  of  new  females.  The  hemispermatophore  is  described  and  illustrated,  facil- 
itating new  comparisons  with  Vaejovis  sprousei  Sissom,  1990,  its  closest  known  relative.  Differences 
in  the  hemispennatophore  and  male  chela  morphometrics  clearly  separate  the  two  species.  Variation 
in  morphometric  characters,  metasomal  setal  counts,  and  pedipalp  chela  finger  dentition  is  analyzed 
on  the  basis  of  this  increased  sample  size. 

KEY  WORDS:  Scorpiones,  Vaejovidae,  Vaejovis  chisos,  morphometrics  and  meristic  variation, 
Texas,  U.S.A. 

The  scorpion  Vaejovis  chisos  Sissom,  1990,  was  described  on  the  basis  of  an 
adult  female  and  two  juvenile  specimens  from  the  Chisos  Mountains  in  Big  Bend 
National  Park  in  Texas,  U.S.A.  The  species  is  closely  related  to  V.  dugesi  Pocock, 
1 902  and  V.  sprousei  Sissom,  1 990,  neither  of  which  were  previously  known 
from  adult  males.  Recently,  a  significant  number  of  new  specimens  of  V.  chisos 
have  been  collected,  including  the  first  adult  males,  and  it  is  the  purpose  here  to 
describe  the  male  and  provide  a  better  assessment  of  intraspecific  variation  in  the 
species.  The  recent  discovery  of  the  male  of  V.  sprousei  (Gonzalez  Santillan  and 
Sissom,  2004)  enables  the  two  species  to  be  more  adequately  compared. 

Measurements  were  taken  using  an  Olympus  Model  VMZ  dissecting  micro- 
scope calibrated  at  20X,  and  illustrations  were  made  from  the  same  microscope 
using  an  ocular  grid.  Landmarks  for  measurements  are  provided  by  Sissom  et  al. 
(1990).  Hemispermatophores  were  dissected  as  described  by  Sissom  et  al. 
(1990);  terminology  for  hemispermatophores  follows  Lamoral  (1979)  and  Stock- 
well  (1989);  trichobothrial  terminology  follows  Vachon  (1974).  GPS  data  for 
collecting  sites  were  taken  from  TrailSmart  Topo!  GPS  Software,  Wildflower 
Productions  1999.  Specimens  are  deposited  at  Appalachian  State  University, 
Boone,  North  Carolina,  U.S.A. 

Vaejovis  chisos  Sissom,  1990 

(Figs.  1-4) 
Vaejovis  chisos  Sissom  1990a:  48,  49-51,  fig,  2A-G. 

Vaejovis  chisos:  Kovarik,  1998:  146;  Sissom  and  Jackman,  1998:  151;  Sissom,  2000:  540;  Gonzalez 
Santillan  et  al.,  2004:  9. 


1  Received  on  July  27,  2004.  Accepted  on  September  3,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Life,  Earth,  &  Environmental  Sciences;  West  Texas  A&M  University;  WTAMU  Box 
60808;  Cayon,  Texas  79016  U.S.A.  E-mail  (LRJ):  leemaroonjarvis(«;hotmail.com.  E-mail  (WDS): 
dsissom@mail.wtamu.edu. 

'  Department  of  Biology,  Appalachian  State  University,  Boone,  North  C'arolina  28608  U.S.A.  E-mail: 
hensonnrn(a  conrad.appstate.edu. 

Mailed  on  February  3,  2005 


208  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Type  Data.  Holotype  female  from  Kibbee  (or  Kibbe)  Spring,  Chisos  Basin,  Chisos  Mountains 
(1,828  m),  Big  Bend  National  Park,  Brewster  Co.,  Texas,  31  Aug  1983  (W.  D.  and  J.  C.  Sissom). 
Deposited  in  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  New  York,  U.S.A. 

Distribution.  Known  only  from  the  Chisos  Mountains,  Texas,  U.S.A. 

Description  of  male.  Adult  27.35  mm  in  length.  Base  coloration  light  yellow  brown,  with  mod- 
erate fuscosity  on  dorsum,  metasoma,  pedipalps,  and  legs. 

Prosoma:  Anterior  carapacial  margin  emarginate;  median  notch  weak,  rounded;  entire  carapacial 
surface  finely  to  coarsely  granular. 

Mesosoma:  Post-tergites  densely  coarsely  granular.  Genital  operculum  completely  divided,  with 
genital  papillae  protruding  posteromedially.  Pectinal  tooth  count  17-18.  Pectinal  teeth  large,  each 
with  elongate  patch  of  peg  sensilla.  Sternite  VII  with  one  pair  of  moderate,  granular  lateral  carinae. 
Stigmata  suboval  to  elongate  suboval. 

Metasoma:  Segments  I-IV:  Dorsolateral  carinae  strong,  serrate  on  I-III,  crenulate  on  IV.  Lateral 
supramedian  carinae  moderate  to  strong,  crenulate.  Lateral  inframedian  carinae  on  I  complete,  gran- 
ulose;  on  II  incomplete,  moderate,  irregularly  granular  on  posterior  third;  on  III  incomplete,  weak  on 
posterior  third;  on  IV  absent.  Ventrolateral  carinae  moderate,  crenulate.  Ventral  submedian  carinae  on 
I  weak,  smooth  to  finely  granular;  on  I  I-IV,  moderate,  crenulate.  Dorsal  intercarinal  spaces  with  scat- 
tered coarse  granulation.  Segment  V:  Dorsolateral  carinae  moderate,  serrate  proximally;  weak,  gran- 
ular distally.  Lateromedian  carinae  present  on  anterior  three-fourths  of  segment,  moderate,  granular. 
Ventrolateral  and  ventromedian  carinae  strong,  serrate.  Intercarinal  spaces  finely  granular.  Metasoma 
I-IV  setal  counts:  dorsolaterals,  0/0:1/1:1/1:1/1;  lateral  supramedians,  0/0:1/1:1/1:2/2;  lateral  infra- 
medians,  1/1:0/0:0/0:0/0;  ventrolaterals,  2/2:2/2:2/3:3/3;  ventral  submedians,  3/3:3/3:3/3:4/4.  Ventral 
accessory  setae  lacking.  Metasomal  segment  V:  dorsolaterals,  3/3;  lateromedians,  2/2;  ventrolaterals, 
4/4.  Metasomal  segment  I  length/width  =  0.92;  III  length/width  =  1.18;  V  length/width  =  2.38. 

Telson:  Dorsal  surface  flattened,  smooth;  ventral  surface  with  irregular  fine  granulation  and  weak 
punctations,  about  16  pairs  of  large  setae. 

Hemispennatophore  (Figs.  1-2):  Moderately  slender;  distal  lamina  with  a  distal  crest  on  dorsal 
surface  and  a  single,  blunt  hook-like  structure  near  the  base.  Capsular  area  with  simple  invaginated 
sperm  duct  floor  (Stockwell  1989:  130)  and  without  conspicuous  lobes  or  processes.  Sperm  duct 
flanked  along  distal  edge  by  a  series  of  minute  denticle-like  structures. 

Chelicerae:  Dentition  typical  of  family  (Vachon  1963;  Sissom  1990b,  fig.  3.1H);  ventral  margin 
of  movable  finger  smooth  (i.e.,  lacking  denticles).  Ventral  aspect  of  cheliceral  movable  finger  with 
distinct  serrula. 

Pedipalps:  Trichobothrial  pattern  Type  C,  orthobothriotaxic  (completely  illustrated  for  the  holo- 
type  female  in  Sissom  1990a:  Fig.  2,  A-F).  Femur:  Dorsointernal,  ventrointernal,  and  dorsoexternal 
carinae  strong,  granulose;  ventroexternal  carinae  vestigial,  with  irregular  coarse  granules  along  dis- 
tal part  of  segment.  Internal  face  with  about  18-20  large  granules;  dorsal  face  with  scattered  coarse 
granulation.  Femur  length/width  ratio  =  3.47.  Patella:  Dorsointernal  and  ventrointernal  carinae 
strong,  serrate.  Dorsoexternal  and  ventroexternal  carinae  moderate,  granular.  Internal  face  with  lon- 
gitudinal row  of  about  16  granules;  external  face  with  scattered  coarse  granulation;  dorsal  and  ven- 
tral faces  lacking  noticeable  granulation.  Patella  length/width  ratio  =  3.30.  Chela  (Figs.  3-4)  with  dor- 
sal marginal  carinae  weak,  granular;  dorsointernal  carinae  weak  to  moderate,  with  a  few  larger, 
rounded  granules;  other  carinae  essentially  obsolete.  Dentate  margin  of  fixed  finger  with  primary  row 
divided  into  six  subrows  by  five  larger  denticles;  six  inner  accessory  denticles;  trichobothria  ib  and 
//  at  base  of  fixed  finger.  Dentate  margin  of  movable  finger  with  primary  denticle  row  divided  into 
six  subrows  by  five  larger  denticles;  apical  subrow  with  only  one  denticle;  seven  inner  accessory  den- 
ticles. Terminal  denticles  of  chela  fingers  somewhat  enlarged  and  bladelike,  overlapping  consider- 
ably when  chela  closed;  fingertips  with  small  white  distal  caps.  Chela  length/width  ratio  =  4.73;  mov- 
able finger  length/chela  width  =  3.05;  fixed  finger  length/carapace  length  =  0.89. 

Legs.  Midventral  spinule  row  of  telotarsus  terminating  between  two  pairs  of  enlarged  spinules. 

Measurements  of  male  (mm):  Total  L,  27.35;  carapace  L,  3.20;  mesosoma  L,  8.65;  metasoma  L, 
1 1.95;  telson  L,  3.55.  Metasomal  segments:  I  LAV,  1.65/1.80;  II  L/W,  1.85/1.70;  III  L/W,  1.95/1.65; 
IV  L/W,  2.70/1.60;  V  L/W,  3.80/1.60.  Telson:  vesicle  LAV/D,  2.25/1.30/1.00;  aculeus  L,  1.30.  Pedi- 
palps: femur  L/W,  2.95/0.85;  patella  L/W,  3.30/1.00;  chela  L/W/D,  5.20/1.10/1.20;  fixed  finger  L, 
2.85;  movable  finger  L,  3.35;  palm  (underhand)  L,  2.05. 


Vol.  115,  No.  4,  September  &  October  2004 


209 


Figs.  1-4.  Morphology  of  the  male  of  Vaejovis  chisos:  1,  dorsal  aspect  of  right  hemisper- 
matophore;  2,  ventral  aspect  of  right  hemispermatophore;  3,  external  aspect  of  right  pedi- 
palp  chela;  4,  dorsal  aspect  of  right  pedipalp  chela. 

Variation.  In  addition  to  the  three  adult  males  examined,  30  new  adult 
females  were  also  available,  providing  the  opportunity  to  better  analyze  variation 
in  morphometric  and  meristic  characters  in  the  species. 

Variation  in  pectinal  tooth  counts  for  3  males  and  20  females  was  as  follows: 
in  males,  there  were  3  combs  with  18  teeth  and  3  combs  with  19  teeth;  in  females 
there  were  1  comb  with  14  teeth,  1 1  combs  with  15  teeth,  22  combs  with  16  teeth, 
and  5  combs  with  17  teeth.  In  the  three  females  from  the  original  type  series, 
there  were  three  combs  with  16  teeth  and  three  with  17.  In  females,  the  genital 
opercula  have  a  membranous  anterior  connection,  but  in  males  they  are  com- 
pletely separated.  Female  pectinal  teeth  are  shorter  and  peglike,  in  contrast  to  the 
larger  "banana-shaped"  teeth  of  the  male.  In  addition,  each  pectinal  tooth  in  the 
male  bears  an  elongate  patch  of  peg  sensilla;  these  patches  are  smaller  in  the 
female. 

Setal  counts  for  the  metasoma  exhibited  little  variation.  The  modal  counts, 
based  on  the  left  metasomal  I-IV  carinae  of  20  specimens,  were  as  follows:  dor- 
solaterals,  0:1:1:1;  lateral  supramedians,  0:1:1:1;  lateral  inframedians.  1:0:0:0; 
ventrolaterals,  2:3:3:3;  and  ventral  submedians,  3:3:3:4.  In  one  of  the  specimens, 
an  unpaired  accessory  seta  was  found  in  the  ventral  intercarinal  space  on  seg- 
ment III.  For  segment  V,  the  modal  counts  for  these  specimens  were:  dorsolater- 
als,  3;  lateromedians,  2;  ventrolaterals,  4.  Four  of  the  specimens  had  small  setal 


2 1 0  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


pores  distally  above  the  ventrolateral  carinae  (not  the  larger  distal  setae  on  the 
anal  carina  where  it  meets  the  ventrolateral  carina),  but  these  were  interpreted  as 
microsetae  and  not  counted. 

Variation  was  also  noted  in  the  number  of  inner  accessory  denticles  flanking 
the  chela  finger  denticle  rows.  These  were  counted  on  20  specimens,  and  the 
counts  are  reported  for  both  the  left  and  right  sides  (L/R).  For  the  chela  fixed  fin- 
ger, three  specimens  exhibited  counts  of  5/5,  five  had  5/6  or  6/5,  and  12  had  6/6. 
In  most  cases  (12/16  fingers),  those  with  five  granules  were  missing  the  basal 
granule  of  the  series,  but  on  four  fingers,  the  distal  denticle  was  missing.  For  the 
movable  finger,  two  specimens  had  counts  of  5/6,  one  had  7/5,  13  had  6/6,  three 
had  6/7  or  7/6,  and  one  had  7/7.  This  type  of  variation  in  inner  accessory  denti- 
cles is  also  seen  in  Vaejovis  vorhiesi  Stahnke,  1940  and  related  species  from 
Arizona  (Sissom,  unpub.  data). 

Variation  in  selected  morphometric  ratios  of  the  three  adult  males  is  as  follows 
(presented  as  mean  ±  sd  [range]):  chela  length/width,  4.78  ±0.11  (4.71-4.90); 
pedipalp  femur  length/width,  3.57  ±  0.14  (3.47-3.73);  pedipalp  patella  length/ 
width,  3.19  ±  0.12  (3.07-3.30);  fixed  finger  length/carapace  length,  0.86  ±  0.06 
(0.79-0.91);  metasomal  segment  III  length/width,  1.23  ±  0.05  (1.18-1.28);  meta- 
somal  segment  V  length/width,  2.33  ±  0.05  (2.27-2.38);  and  carapace  length/ 
metasomal  segment  V  length,  0.88  ±  0.62  (0.84-0.91).  For  20  females,  the  ratios 
were  as  follows:  chela  length/width,  4.80  ±  0.25  (4.39-5.25);  pedipalp  femur 
length/width,  3.44  ±  0.12  (3.17-3.57);  pedipalp  patella  length/width,  3.08  ±  0.07 
(2.96-3.20);  fixed  finger  length/carapace  length,  0.86  ±  0.02  (0.81-0.90);  meta- 
somal segment  III  length/width,  1.09  ±  0.03  (1.05-1.13);  metasomal  segment  V 
length/width,  2.21  ±  0.05  (2.14-2.32);  and  carapace  length/metasomal  segment  V 
length,  0.97  ±0.02  (0.93-1. 10). 

Comments.  The  morphometric  ratios  used  earlier  to  separate  females  of  V. 
chisos  from  V.  sprousei  (Sissom  1990a)  are  still  largely  valid,  except  that  there  is 
very  slight  overlap  between  the  lower  end  of  the  ranges  in  V.  chisos  and  the  upper 
end  of  the  ranges  in  V.  sprousei.  The  differences  in  the  male  hemispermatophore 
(see  below)  and  chela  morphometrics  (slender  in  V.  chisos  and  slightly  inflated 
in  V.  sprousei)  provide  additional  characters  to  separate  the  two  species. 

Within  the  mexicanus  group,  the  hemispermatophores  of  V.  chisos  and  V. 
sprousei  are  quite  similar  in  structure.  Both  have  a  crest  on  the  distal  lamina,  a 
single  blunt  hook  at  the  base  of  the  blade  on  the  dorsal  aspect,  and  a  series  of  den- 
ticles along  the  invaginated  floor  of  the  sperm  duct.  However,  the  hemisper- 
matophore of  V.  chisos  is  much  more  slender  than  that  of  V.  sprousei  (see  Gon- 
zalez Santillan  and  Sissom,  2004).  Further,  the  denticles  along  the  sperm  duct  are 
very  distinct  in  V.  sprousei  but  minute  and  scarcely  discernible  in  V.  chisos. 

Specimens  were  collected  in  thickly  wooded  areas  with  substantial  ground 
cover  (i.e.  decayed  leaves,  plant  cover),  mainly  from  the  banks  and  slopes  asso- 
ciated with  trail  cuts.  These  areas  were  moister  than  adjoining  slopes  where  the 
species  was  not  found. 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 211 


Specimens  Examined.  USA:  Texas:  Brewster  Co.:  Big  Bend  National  Park,  near  upper  end  of 
Pine  Canyon,  27  May  1992  (R.  Henson,  J.  Davidovvski,  T.  Weseman),  3  females,  1  male  (ASU);  Big 
Bend  National  Park,  from  waterfall  in  Pine  Canyon  to  edge  of  wooded  area  (29°15'44"  N: 
103  =  15'15"W  to  29J16'01"N:  103°14'44"W),  27  May  1992  (R.  Henson,  T.  Weseman,  }.  Davidowski), 
1  male  (ASU);  Big  Bend  National  Park,  Upper  Pine  Canyon  Trail,  23  May  2003  (R.  Henson,  P.  Car- 
michael,  N.  Lopez,  A.  Anderson),  16  females,  1  male  (ASU);  29  May  2003,  1  female,  6  juvs.  (ASU); 
Big  Bend  National  Park,  Kibbee  Spring  Trail  (29  16'24"N:  103°17'06"W  to  29°16'25"N: 
103°17'13"W),  22  May  1992  (R.  N.  Henson,  T.  Weseman,  J.  Davidowski),  1  female  (ASU);  Big  Bend 
National  Park,  wooded  area  of  Pine  Canyon  Trail,  27  May  2002  (R.  N.  Henson,  T.  Weseman,  J. 
Davidowski),  9  females,  1  juvenile  male  (ASU). 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  are  grateful  to  the  National  Park  Service  for  providing  collecting  permits  (BIBE-92-014  and 
BIBE-2003-0024)  for  research  in  the  park  and  to  Mike  Fleming  and  Vidal  Davila  of  Big  Bend 
National  Park  for  facilitating  the  permit  process.  We  also  thank  Brent  E.  Hendrixson  and  Kari  J. 
Me  West  for  reviewing  the  manuscript.  Page  charges  were  paid  by  the  Department  of  Life,  Earth,  and 
Environmental  Sciences,  West  Texas  A&M  University,  and  reprint  costs  by  the  Department  of 
Biology,  Appalachian  State  University. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Gonzalez  Santillan,  E.,  W.  D.  Sissom,  and  T.  M.  Perez.  2004.  Description  of  the  male  of  Vaejovis 
sprousei  Sissom,  1990  (Scorpiones:  Vaejovidae).  Texas  Memorial  Museum.  Speleological  Mono- 
graphs 6:  9-12. 

Kovafik,  F.   1998.  Stiri  (Scorpions).  Madagaskar,  Jilhava.  175  pp.  (in  Czech). 

Lamoral,  B.  H.  1979.  The  scorpions  of  Namibia  (Arachnida:  Scorpionida).  Annals  of  the  Natal 
Museum  23(3):  497-784. 

Sissom,  W.  D.  1990a.  Systematics  of  Vaejovis  dugesi,  new  status  Pocock,  with  descriptions  of  two 
new  related  species  (Scorpiones,  Vaejovidae).  Southwestern  Naturalist  35(1):  47-53. 

Sissom,  W.  D.  1990b.  Systematics,  biogeography  and  paleontology.  Chapter  3.  pp.  64-160.  In,  G. 
A.  Polis  (Editor).  Biology  of  Scorpions.  Stanford  University  Press.  Stanford,  California,  U.S.A. 

587  pp. 

Sissom,  W.  D.,  G.  A.  Polis,  and  D.  D.  Watt.  1990.  Laboratory  and  field  methods.  Chapter  12.  Pp. 
445-461.  //;.  G.  A.  Polis  (Ed.).  The  Biology  of  Scorpions.  Stanford  University  Press.  Stanford, 
California,  U.S.A.  587  pp. 

Sissom,  W.  D.  and  .1.  .lackman.  1998.  Order  Scorpiones  -  Scorpions,  pp.  148-155.  //;.  J.  Jackman. 
A  Field  Guide  to  Spiders  and  Scorpions  of  Texas.  Texas  Monthly  Field  Guide  Series.  Gulf  Pub- 
lishing Company.  Houston,  Texas,  U.S.A. 

Sissom,  W.  D.  2000.  Family  Vaejovidae  Thorell.  1876.  Pp.  503-553.  In.  Fet.  V,  W.  D.  Sissom.  G. 
Lowe,  and  M.  Braunwalder.  Catalog  of  the  scorpions  of  the  \\orld  ( 1758-1997).  Entomological 
Society.  New  York,  NY,  U.S.A.  690  pp. 

Stockwell,  S.  A.  1989.  Review  of  the  phylogeny  and  higher  classification  of  scorpions  (Cheli- 
cerata).  Ph.D.  Dissertation  (Entomology).  University  of  California.  Berkeley,  C'A,  U.S.A.  413  pp. 

TrailSmart  Topo!    1999.  GPS  Software.  Wildflower  Productions,  San  Francisco,  California,  U.S.A. 

Vachon,  M.  1963.  De  I'utilite,  en  systematique.  d'une  nomenclature  des  dents  de  cheliceres  chez 
les  Scorpions.  Bulletin  du  Museum  National  d'Histoirc  Naturelle.  Paris  (2)  35(2):  161-166. 


THE  AMERICAN   ENTOMOLOGICAL   SOCIETY 
APPLICATION     FOR     MEMBERSHIP 

Membership  coincides  with  the  calendar  year  running  from  January  1  to  December  31.  If  joining 
midyear,  back  issues  will  be  mailed.  Unless  requested  otherwise,  membership  application  received 
after  October  1  will  be  credited  to  the  following  year. 


DUES  FOR  2005: 

Regular:  $20 
Student:  $12 


$ 


Students  must  provide  proof  of  student  status 

Paid  membership  dues  are  required  for  the 
following  member's  subscription  rates: 

D   ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 
Vol.  116  @  $15.00  per  year:       $ 


D  TRANSACTIONS  OF  TAES 

Vol.  131  @$  15.00  per  year:       $ 


a,  a  a,  a 


Total: 


$ 


• 


NAME 


ADDRESS 


CITY 


STATE 


ZIP 


E-MAIL    (PLEASE  PRINT  CLEARLY) 


TELEPHONE 


D  Check  or  money  order  (in  US  currency  through  a  US  bank) 
payable  to  The  American  Entomological  Society. 

Credit  card:     D  VISA      D  Discover     D  MasterCard     D  AmEx 


CREDIT  CARD  NUMBER 


EXPIRATION  DATE 


NAME  ON  CARD 


SIGNATURE 


AES  Federal  ID  No.:  23-1599849 

MAIL  FORM  &  PAYMENTTO: 

The  American  Entomological  Society 
at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

Telephone:  (215)  561-3978 
E-mail:  aes@acnatsci.org 

www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 213 

ADDITIONS  AND  EMENDATIONS  TO  THE 

MAYFLY  (EPHEMEROPTERA)  FAUNA  OF 

SASKATCHEWAN,  CANADA1 

J.  M.  Webb,2  D.  W.  Parker,'  D.  M.  Lehmkuhl,4  and  McCafferty5 

ABSTRACT:  Twenty-four  species  of  Ephemeroptera  are  added  to  the  known  Ephemeroptera  fauna 
of  Saskatchewan  based  on  the  report  of  new  data.  Five  species  previously  recorded  from  Saskatche- 
wan were  based  on  misidentifications  or  unsubstantiated  data.  With  the  new  additions  and  emenda- 
tions, 106  species  of  mayflies  are  known  from  Saskatchewan.  Significant  range  extensions  are  report- 
ed for  Pluiulitus  gloveri,  Procloeon  viridoculare,  and  Serratella  serrata. 

KEY  WORDS:  Ephemeroptera,  Saskatchewan  (Canada),  new  records,  emendations 

McCafferty  and  Randolph  (1998)  accounted  for  83  mayfly  species  from  Sas- 
katchewan in  their  faunistic  review  of  Canadian  Ephemeroptera.  Since  then 
another  three  nominal  species  were  reported  by  Sun  et  al.  (2002),  Randolph  et  al. 
(2002),  and  McCafferty  et  al.  (2004),  and  two  previously  reported  species  have 
been  removed  from  the  list  of  species  known  from  Saskatchewan  as  a  result  of 
synonymies  (McCafferty  2001,  Wang  and  McCafferty  2004).  It  should  also  be 
noted  that  Arthroplea  bipunctata  (McDunnough),  Ecdyonurus  simplicioides 
(McDunnough),  and  Asioplax  edmundsi  (Allen)  [reported  as  Tricorythodes  cor- 
pulentus  Kilgore  and  Allen]  had  been  correctly  reported  from  Saskatchewan 
(Mason  and  Lehmkuhl  1983,  Whiting  and  Sheard  1990)  but  were  not  listed  by 
McCafferty  and  Randolph  (1998).  A  further  study  of  the  Saskatchewan  fauna,  as 
reported  here  and  based  primarily  on  the  study  of  old  and  new  collections,  has 
generated  numerous  new  provincial  records  and  allowed  corrections  to  certain 
previous  records.  The  Saskatchewan  record  of  Procloeon  rivulare  (Traver)  by 
Mason  and  Lehmkuhl  (1983)  cannot  be  confirmed  and  is  highly  unlikely,  the  rec- 
ords of  Heptagenia  solitaria  McDunnough  and  Ephemerella  aurivillii  (Bengts- 
son)  by  Lehmkuhl  (1976)  are  referable  to  H.  pulla  (Clemens)  and  E.  needhami 
McDunnough  respectively,  and  a  record  of  Tortopus primus  (McDunnough)  by 
Lehmkuhl  (1976)  was  only  a  probable  record  and  has  not  yet  been  substantiated. 
Additionally,  the  material  reported  as  Baetisca  obesa  (Say)  by  Lehmkuhl  (1972) 
is  referable  to  B.  laurentina  McDunnough.  Therefore,  H.  solitaria.  P.  rivulare, 
E.  aurivillii,  T.  primus,  and  B.  obesa  should  be  deleted  from  the  Saskatchewan  list 
of  mayflies.  The  following  species  should  be  added  to  the  Saskatchewan  list  of 
mayflies  based  on  new  data:  Ameletus  siibnotatus,  Baetis  bicaitdatus,  B. 


1  Submitted  April  3,  2003.  Accepted  September  29,  2004. 

-'  Department  of  Entomology,  Purdue  University,  West  Lafayette,  IN  47907  U.S.A.  E-mail:  jmw975(« 
yahoo.com. 

1  Aquatax  Consulting,  Saskatoon,  Saskatchewan,  Canada.  E-mail:  dale.parker@sasktel.net 

'Department  of  Biology,  University  of  Saskatchewan,  Saskatoon,  Saskatchewan,  S7N  5E2  Canada. 
E-mail:  Ichmkuhlw  duke.usaskca. 

'Department   of  Entomology,    Purdue    University,   West    Lafayette,    IN   47907    U.S.A.    E-mail: 
pat_mccaffertyta  entm.purdue.edu. 

Mailed  on  February  3,  2005 


2 1 4  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


bnndyae,  B.  intercalates,  Centroptihim  album,  C.  conturbatum,  Plauditus  cestus, 
P.  gloveri,  Procloeon  ingens,  P.  mendax,  P.  rufostrigatum,  P.  simplex,  P.  viri- 
doculare,  Baelisca  columbiana,  Brachycercus  edmundsi,  Caenis  hilaris,  Ewylo- 
phella  bicolor,  Serratella  setrata,  S.  tibialis,  Leucrocuta  maculipennis,  Sip/ilop- 
lecton  basale,  and  Parameletus  chelifer.  Based  on  the  additions,  corrections,  and 
deletions  of  Saskatchewan  mayflies  given  or  revised  herein,  there  are  currently 
106  species  accounted  for  in  Saskatchewan.  Some  further  modification  will  be 
apparent  in  the  treatment  of  new  data  given  below. 

Data  presented  herein  are  given  alphabetically  under  applicable  families. 
Unless  indicated  otherwise,  all  material  examined  are  larvae  and  all  collections 
were  made  by  JMW.  Vouchers  of  material  examined  are  located  in  the  collection 
of  JMW,  unless  otherwise  indicated. 

Ameletidae 

Ameletus  subnotatus  Eaton 

Material  Examined:  Pasquia  R.  at  Hwy  9,  53.253°N  102.114°W,  25-IV-1980  ER  Whiting; 
Weyakwin  R.  at  Hwy  2,  54.434°N  105.820°W,  27-IX-1997;  McVey  Cr.  at  Hwy  55,  53.426°N 
1 02.682° W,  24-1 V- 1980  ER  Whiting. 

Baetidae 
Baetis  bicaudatus  Dodds 

Larvae  were  found  in  collections  from  north  of  Lake  Athabasca,  in  extreme 
northwestern  Saskatchewan. 

Material  Examined:  Shaft  Cr.,  59.570°N  1 08.680° W,  26- VI- 1986  J  Ciberowski  &  ER  Whiting; 
Berth  Cr.,  59.567°N  108.533°W,  26-VI-1986  J  Ciberowski  &  ER  Whiting;  Crackingstone  R.  at 
Laredo  Rd.  Brg.,  59.500°N  109.983°W,  29-VI-1986  J  Ciberowski  &  ER  Whiting. 

Baetis  bundyae  Lehmkuhl 

In  Saskatchewan,  this  species  was  found  in  slow-flowing  streams  in  the  north- 
western portion  of  the  province. 

Material  Examined:  Shaft  Cr.,  59.570°N  1 08.680° W,  26-VI-1986  J  Ciberowski  &  ER  Whiting; 
Berth  Cr.,  59.567'N  1 08.533°  W,  26-VI-1986  J  Ciberowski  &  ER  Whiting;  Stream  at  Km  75  of  Hwy 
955,  56.989°N  109.034°W,  30-VI-2000  (+  reared  adult),  9-V1-2001  JMW  &  M  Pollock;  Stream  on 
Hwy  955,  57.075°N  109.07FW,  30-VI-2000. 

Baetis  intercalaris  McDunnough 

This  species  was  collected  only  in  medium  and  large  streams  along  the 

Manitoba  Escarpment  and  the  Cypress  Hills. 

Material  Examined:  Fir  R.  at  Hudson  Bay  Regional  Park,  52. 82  IN  102.388°W,  23-VI1-2001; 
Red  Deer  R.  at  Hudson  Bay  Regional  Park,  52.814°N  102. 373° W,  19-VII-2000;  Frenchman  R.  at  Rav- 
enscrag,  49.490°N  109.087°W,  23-VI-2000;  Carrot  R.  at  Hwy  55,  53.365"N  103.263°W,  23-VI1-2001. 

Centroptihim  album  McDunnough 

In  Saskatchewan,  this  species  is  widespread  throughout  the  boreal  forest. 

Material  Examined:  Broad  Cr.  at  Hwy  904,  54.840°N  108.408  W,  10-VI-2001  JMW  &  M  Pol- 
lock, l-VII-2000;  Green  Bush  Cr.  at  Hwy  3,  52.835°N  102.701°W,  19-VII-2000;  Low  Cr.  at  Hwy 
904,  54.824  N  108.478  W,  l-VII-2000;  Otosquen  Cr.  at  Hwy  9,  53.301  'N  102.158°W,  9-VII-2001; 
Overflowing  R.  at  Hwy  9,  53.026"N  102.322°W,  19-VII-2000;  Stream  at  Km  170  of  Hwy  903, 
55.432°N  108.769°W,  10-VI-2001  JMW  &  M  Pollock;  Umpherville  R.  at  Hwy  905,  58.093°N 
103.792°W,  8-VIII-2000;  Weyakwin  R.  at  Hwy  2,  54.434°N  105.820°W,  7-VII-2000. 


Vol.  1 1  5.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 215 

Centroptilum  conterbatum  McDunnough 

Material  Examined:  Battle  Cr.  at  Ranger  Station,  West  Block  of  Cypress  Hills  Provincial  Park, 
49.600"N  109.923°W,  25-VI-2000,  30-VII-2000;  Low  Cr.  at  Hwy  904,  54.825°N  108.78°W,  1-VII- 
2000;  Pasquia  R.  at  Hwy  9,  53.250  N  102.110  W,  20-VII-2000;  Stream  on  Hwy  955,  57.075°N 
1 09.07° W,  30-VI-2000. 

Plauditus  cestus  (Provonsha  and  McCafferty) 

Larvae  of  this  species  were  collected  from  pea-sized  gravel  in  medium-gradi- 
ent streams  draining  the  Manitoba  Escarpment. 

Material  Examined:  Green  Bush  Cr.  at  Hwy  3,  52.835°N  102.701  W,17-VI1-1999,  19-VII-2000; 
Red  Deer  R.  at  Rendek  Elm  Forest,  52.910°N  102.030'W,  24-V-2001;  Torch  R.  at  Hwy  35.  53.535°N 
1 04.057° W,  22-VII-1986  ER  Whiting,  2-V1I-1986  V  Keeler. 

Plauditus  gloveri  McCafferty  and  Waltz 

Several  larvae  were  collected  from  streams  along  the  Manitoba  Escarpment. 

This  report  represents  a  considerable  northwestern  range  extension. 

Material  Examined:  Green  Bush  Cr.  at  Hwy  3,  52.835°N  1 02.70 1°W,  19-VII-2000;  McVey  Cr. 
at  Hwy  55,  53.426°N  102.682°W,  20-VII-2000;  Stream  on  Hwy  9,  S  of  Hudson  Bay,  52.668°N 
102.372°W,  24-V-2001;  Whitefox  R.  at  Hwy  35,  53.517°N  104.057°W,  2-VIM986  ER  Whiting. 

Procloeon  ingens  (McDunnough) 

A  single  larva  was  found  in  a  pool  of  a  stream  along  the  Manitoba  Escarpment. 
Material  Examined:  Overflowing  R.  at  Hwy  9,  53.026°N  102.322°W,  19-VII-2000. 

Procloeon  mendax  (Walsh) 

A  single  larva  of  this  species  was  found  in  a  small  stream  in  northern 

Saskatchewan. 

Material  Examined:  Stream  at  Km  105  of  Hwy  905,  57.084°N  103.773°W,  8-VIII-2000. 

Procloeon  rufostrigatum  (McDunnough) 

Several  larvae  were  collected  from  streams  along  the  Manitoba  Escarpment. 

Material  Examined:  Carrot  R.  at  Hwy  55,  53.365°N  1 03.263° W,  23-VII-2001;  Fir  R.  at  Hudson 
Bay  Regional  Park,  52.82TN  102.388°W,  23-VII-2001;  Green  Bush  Cr.  at  Hwy  3,  52.835°N 
102.701  °W,  19-VII-2000;  Red  Deer  R.  at  Hudson  Bay  Regional  Park,  52.814°N  102.373°W,  19-VII- 
2000;  Red  Deer  R.  at  Rendek  Elm  Forest,  52.9 10°N  1 02.030° W,  9-VII-2001. 

Procloeon  simplex  (McDunnough) 

Larvae  were  collected  from  submerged  vegetation  in  depositional  areas  of 
streams  throughout  western  and  central  Saskatchewan. 

Material  Examined:  Battle  Cr.  at  Ranger  Station,  West  Block  of  Cypress  Hills  Provincial  Park. 
49.600°N  109.923°W,  30-V1I-2000;  Beaver  R.  at  Hwy  4,  54.295°N  108.601°W,  l-VII-2000;  French- 
man R.  at  Ravenscrag,  49.490°N  1()9.087°W,  23-VI-2000,  29-VI1-2000,  30-VII-1999;  Overflowing 
R.  at  Hwy  9,  53.026°N  102.322°W,  19-VI1-2000;  Stream  on  Hwy  965,  55.1 15  N  107.914  W,  30-VI- 
2000;  Waskcsiu  R.  at  Hwy  2,  54.076°N  105.989°W,  6-VII-2000. 

Procloeon  viridoculare  Berner 

Saskatchewan  represents  the  northernmost  record  of  this  species.  In  Saskatch- 
ewan, larvae  were  found  in  large  parkland  rivers  and  in  streams  along  the 


2 1 6  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Manitoba  Escarpment.  All  larvae  were  collected  in  areas  with  silt-covered,  medi- 
um sized  cobbles. 

Material  Examined:  Battle  R.  at  Hwy  21,  l-VII-2000;  Fir  R.  at  Hudson  Bay  Regional  Park, 
52.82TN  102.388°W,  23-VII-2001  (+  reared  adult);  North  Saskatchewan  R.  at  Borden  Bridge, 
52.37TN  107.145°W,  14-VII-1999,  2-X-1999. 


Baetiscidae 
Baetisca  columbiana  Edmunds 

Webb  and  McCafferty  (2003)  recently  confirmed  the  validity  of  this  species 
and  reported  it  from  Alberta. 

Material  Examined:  Umpherville  R.  at  Hwy  905,  58.093°N  103. 792° W,  8-VIII-2000. 

Baetisca  laurentina  McDunnough 

Re-examination  of  material  reported  as  B.  obesa  from  Saskatchewan  by 
Lehmkuhl  (1972)  showed  they  were  referable  to  B.  laurentina.  This  species  is 
found  throughout  the  boreal  forest. 

Material  Examined:  Fir  R.  at  Hudson  Bay  Regional  Park,  52.82TN  102.388°W,  23-VII-2001; 
Giekie  R.  15km  upstream  of  Hwy  905,  57.600°N  104.133°W,  12-VI-1980  ER  Whiting;  Hudson  Bay 
(town),  1958,  no  collector  indicated  (deposited  in  museum  of  Agriculture  and  Agrifood  Canada, 
Saskatoon  SK);  McFarlane  R.,  59.200°N  1 07.91  T  W,  20-VI-1980  J  Ciberowski;  Red  Deer  R.  at  Ren- 
dek  Elm  Forest,  52.9 10°N  102.030°W,  24-V-2001  (+  reared  adults),  8-V-2001  JMW  &  DW  Parker  (+ 
reared  adults);  Stream  on  Hwy  9  S  of  Hudson  Bay,  52.668'N  102.372°W,  24-V-2001;  Torch  R.  at 
Hwy  35,  53.535°N  104.057°W,  27-V-1986  ER  Whiting;  Torch  R.  N  of  Hwy  35,  53.539°N  104.069°W, 
9-VII-2001,  8-V-2001  JMW  &  DW  Parker,  25-V-2000  JMW  &  DW  Parker  (+  reared  adults). 


Caenidae 
Brachycercus  edmundsi  Soldan 

This  species  has  been  found  in  small  boreal  streams  and  the  Saskatchewan  R. 
System.  In  the  South  Saskatchewan  R.,  B.  edmundsi  is  only  found  downstream 
of  Gardiner  Dam,  a  hypolimnetic-release  hydroelectric  dam.  Upstream  of  the 
dam  and  its  associated  impoundment,  B.  edmundsi  is  replaced  by  B.  prudens  (Me 
Dunnough). 

Material  Examined:  Arsenault  R.  at  Hwy  903,  55.113°N  108.378°W,  10-VI-2001  JMW  &  M 
Pollock;  Battle  R.  at  Hwy  21,  52.84 1°N  1 09.343° W,  l-VII-2000  (adults);  Cr.  at  Km  65  of  Hwy  9, 
53.370°N  102.088°W,  23-VII-2001;  Green  Bush  Cr.  at  Hwy  3,  52.835°N  102.701  W,  17-VII-1999; 
MacLennan  R.  at  Hwy  2,  54.200°N  1 05.933° W,  16-VI-1971  DH  Smith;  North  Saskatchewan  R.  at 
Cecil  Ferry,  53.229°N  105.5 114°W,  ll-VI-1971  DM  Lehmkuhl  (+  reared  adults),  6-VI-2000;  Otos- 
quen  Cr.  at  Hwy  9,  53.301  °N  102. 158° W,  24-VII-1999,  9-VII-2001;  South  Saskatchewan  R.  at  Queen 
Elizabeth  Power  Station,  52.130°N  106.650°W,  10-VII-1999  (+  reared  adults),  2-VI-2000. 

Caenis  hilaris  (Say) 

This  species  occurs  in  medium-sized  rivers  in  eastern  Saskatchewan.  Saskat- 
chewan extends  its  known  range  westward. 

Material  Examined:  Fir  R.  at  Hudson  Bay  Regional  Park,  52. 82  IN  102.388°W,  23-VII-2001; 
Montreal  R.  at  Hwy  2,  55.038°N  105.3ir\V,  8-VIII-2000;  Red  Deer  R.  at  Rendek  Elm  Forest, 
52.910°N  102.030°W,  8-VII-2001  (adults);  Torch  R.  at  Hwy  35,  53.535°N  104.057°W,  22-VII-I986 
ER  Whiting;  Torch  R.  N  of  Hwy  35,  53.539°N  104.069°W,  22-VII-2001,  9-VII-2001;  Whitefox  R.  at 
Hwy  35,  53.3 17°N  104.057°W,  2-VII-1986  V  Keeler. 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 


Ephemerellidae 
Ephemerella  needhami  McDunnough 

All  previous  reports  of  E.  aurivillii  (Lehmkuhl  1976)  were  found  to  be  refer- 
able to  E.  needhami.  This  species  is  common  in  fast-flowing  streams  throughout 

the  boreal  forest. 

Material  Examined:  Crackingstone  R.  at  Laredo  Rd.  Brg.,  8km  SW  of  Uranium  City,  59.500°N 
108.700°W,  29-VI-1986  J  Ciberowski  &  ER  Whiting;  Giekie  R.  15km  upstream  of  Hwy  905, 
57.600°N  104.133°W,  1 2-VI-l 980  ER  Whiting;  Green  Bush  Cr.  at  Hwy  3,  52. 835 °N  102.701°W,  19- 
VII-2000  (+ reared  adult);  Meeyomoot  R.  at  Hwy  165,  54.768°N  105.158°W,  17-VI-1971  DH  Smith, 
13-VI-2000;  Mistohay  R.  at  Hwy  104,  9- VI I- 1974  L  Dosdall  (adult);  Overflowing  R.  at  Hwy  9, 
53.026°N  102.322°W,  20-V-1980  ER  Whiting;  Red  Deer  R.  at  Rendek  Elm  Forest,  52.910°N 
1 02.030° W,  24-V-2001;  River  10km  W  of  Uranium  City,  59.567°N  108.783°W,  21 -VI- 1986  L  Dos- 
dall &  DW  Parker;  Stream  at  Km  165  of  Hwy  903,  55.4 15°N  1 08.71 8° W,  10-VI-2001  JMW  &  M 
Pollock;  Torch  R.  at  Hwy  35,  53.535°N  104.057°W,  27-V-1986  ER  Whiting,  2-VI1-1986  V  Keeler, 
8-VII-1986  V  Keeler;  Torch  R.  N  of  Hwy  35,  53.539°N  104.069°W,  8-V-2001  JMW  &  DW  Parker, 
25-V-2000  JMW  &  DW  Parker. 

Eurylophella  bicolor  (Clemens) 

Material  Examined:  Giekie  R.  15km  upstream  of  Hwy  905,  57.600  N  104.133°W,  12-VI-1980 
ER  Whiting;  Red  Deer  R.  at  Rendek  Elm  Forest,  52.9 10°N  1 02.030° W,  8-V-2001  JMW  &  DW 
Parker,  24-V-2001;  Stream  on  Hwy  905,  57.252°N  103.998°W,  8-VIII-2000;  Torch  R.  at  Hwy  35, 
53.535°N  104.057°W,  2-VII-1986  V  Keeler,  27-V-1986  ER  Whiting;  Torch  R.  N  of  Hwy  35, 
53.539°N  1 04.069° W,  25-V-2001  JMW  &  DW  Parker. 

Serratella  serrata  (Morgan) 

In  Saskatchewan,  this  was  collected  from  a  small  creek  with  large  boulders  in 

the  northeastern  portion  of  the  province. 

Material  Examined:  Montreal  R.  at  Station  2.  25-VII-1960  Cushing;  Umpherville  R.  at  Hwy 
905,  58.093°N  103.792°W,  8-VIII-2000. 

Serratella  tibialis  (McDunnough) 

Material  Examined:  Broad  Cr.  at  Hwy  904,  54.840°N  108.408°W.  9-VII-1974  L  Dosdall 
(+  adults);  Low  Cr.  at  Hwy  904,  54.824°N  1 08.478° W,  l-VII-2000. 


Heptageniidae 
Leucrocuta  maculipennis  (Walsh) 

In  Saskatchewan,  this  species  is  exclusively  found  in  portions  of  the  South 
Saskatchewan  River  that  have  not  been  altered  by  hydroelectric  dams.  Interest- 
ingly, Whiting  and  Sheard  (1990)  did  not  record  its  presence  in  the  South  Sas- 
katchewan R.,  although  it  is  now  one  of  the  most  abundant  heptageniids  there. 

Material  Examined:  South  Saskatchewan  R.  at  Lemsford  Ferry,  51.030°N  109.120'W,  30-YI1- 
2000,  I6-IX-2000  (+-  reared  adults).  6-VI-2001.  3-VII-2001  (+  reared  adults),  20-VIII-2001. 


Metretopodidae 
Siphloplecton  hasale  (Walker) 

This  species  is  found  in  northern  lakes,  the  Saskatchewan  R.  and  its  larger 
tributaries  (except  the  South  Saskatchewan  R.),  and  medium-sized  boreal  rivers. 


2 1 8  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Material  Examined:  Courtney  Lake  at  Hwy  905,  57.386°N  103.979°W,  13-VI-2000;  Giekie  R. 
15  Km  upstream  of  Hwy  905,  57.600°N  104.133°W  13-V1-1982  ER  Whiting  (adult);  Giekie  R.  at 
Hwy  905,  57.703°N  103.951°W,  12-VI-2000;  McDougal  Cr.  at  Hwy  120,  54. 103°  N  104.537°W,  16- 
Vl-1980  ER  Whiting  (adult);  North  Saskatchewan  R.  at  Cecil  Ferry,  53.229°N  105.5114°W,  26-IV- 
1980  ER  Whiting;  Saskatchewan  R.  at  Squaw  Rapids  Powerhouse  Boat  Ramp,  53.683°N  103.333°W, 
14- V- 1980  PG  Mason  (adults);  Torch  R.  N  of  Hwy  35,  53.539°N  1 04.069°  W,  25-V-2000  JMW  &  DW 
Parker  (adults);  Wathaman  R.  at  Hwy  905,  57.078°N  103. 742° W,  17-VI-1982  ER  Whiting  (adult). 


Siphlonuridae 

Parameletm  chelifer  Bengtsson 
Material  Examined:  McFarlane  R.,  59.150CN  107.900°W,  18-VI-1980  J  Ciberowski  (adult). 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

M.  Pollock  assisted  J.M.  Webb  in  the  field  and  J.  Guenther  provided  valuable  comments  on  the 
manuscript.  This  research  was  funded  in  part  by  a  grant  to  DML  and  JMW  from  the  Northern 
Scientific  Training  Program  and  by  a  grant  to  JMW  from  Saskatchewan  Environment  and  Resource 
Management. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Lehmkuhl,  D.  M.  1972.  Baetisca  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetiscidae)  from  the  western  interior  of 
Canada  with  notes  on  the  life  cycle.  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  50:  1015-1017. 

Lehmkuhl,  D.  M.   1976.  Mayflies.  Blue  Jay  34:  70-81. 

Mason,  P.  G.  and  D.  M.  Lehmkuhl.  1983.  Effects  of  the  Squaw  Rapids  hydroelectric  development 
on  Saskatchewan  River  Chironomidae  (Diptera).  Memoirs  of  the  Entomological  Society  of 
America  34:  187-210. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  2001.  Commentary  on  Ametmpus  species  (Ephemeroptera:  Ametropodidae)  in 
North  America.  Great  Lakes  Entomologist  34:  1-6. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  and  R.  P.  Randolph.  1998.  Canada  mayflies:  a  faunistic  compendium.  Proceed- 
ings of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Ontario  129:  47-97. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.,  M.  D.  Meyer,  J.  M.  Webb,  and  L.  M.  Jacobus.  2004.  New  state  and  provin- 
cial records  for  North  American  small  minnow  mayflies  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae).  Entomo- 
logical News  115(2):  93-100. 

Randolph,  R.  P.,  D.  Zaranko,  W.  P.  McCafferty,  L.  M.  Jacobus,  and  J.  M.  Webb.  2002.  New 
Canadian  records  of  Baetidae  (Ephemeroptera)  and  adjustments  to  North  American  Cloeon. 
Entomological  News  113:  306-309. 

Sun,  L.,  J.  M.  Webb,  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  2002.  Cercohrachys  cree:  a  new  species  (Ephemer- 
optera: Caenidae)  from  western  North  America.  Entomological  News  113:  80-86. 

Wang,  T.-Q.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  2004.  Heptageniidae  of  the  World.  Part  I:  Phylogenetic  Higher 
Classification.  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  130:  1 1-45. 

Webb,  J.  M.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  2003.  New  records  of  mayflies  (Ephemeroptera)  from  Alberta, 
Canada.  Entomological  News  114:  230-232. 

Whiting,  E  R.  and  J.  Sheard.  1990.  Patterns  in  the  distribution  of  heptageniid  (Ephemeroptera) 
species  in  Saskatchewan,  Canada.  Freshwater  Biology  24:  143-157. 


Vol.  115.  No.  4,  September  &  October  2004 219 

NEW  SPECIES  OF  HERCOSTOMUS  FROM  TAIWAN 
(DIPTERA:  DOLICHOPODIDAE)1 

Lili  Zhang,-1  Ding  Vang,2-'  and  Kazuhiro  Masunaga4 

ABSTRACT:  Three  species  of  Hercostomus  from  Taiwan  are  described  as  new  to  science:  Hercos- 
tomus  chiaiensis  sp.  nov.,  H.  hualienensis  sp.  nov.,  and  H.  taitungensis  sp.  nov. 

KEY  WORDS:  Diptera,  Dolichopodidae,  Hercostomus,  Taiwan,  new  species 

The  genus  Hercostomus  is  one  of  the  most  diverse  genera  in  the  Dolichopo- 
didae with  about  500  known  species  worldwide.  Seventeen  species  of 
Hercostomus  from  Taiwan  were  recorded  in  the  catalogue  of  Dyte  (1975).  With 
the  work  of  Wei  (1997),  Yang  (1996,  1997a-b),  Yang  and  Grootaert  (1999),  Yang 
and  Saigusa  (1999,  2000,  2001a-d,  2002),  Yang  and  Yang  (1995),  Yang,  Yang 
and  Li  (1998),  Zhang  and  Yang  (2003a-c),  the  number  of  species  of  Hercostomus 
known  from  continental  China  soared  from  11  species  (Dyte  1975,  Negrobov 
1991)  to  235  species.  The  species  of  Hercostomus  from  Taiwan  remains  poorly 
known.  Taiwan  belongs  to  the  Oriental  Realm  with  a  subtropical  and  tropical  cli- 
mate. The  fauna  of  Dolichopodidae  of  Taiwan  is  definitely  rich  and  unique. 

In  this  paper,  three  species  of  Hercostomus,  which  belong  to  the  H.  hamatus- 
group,  from  Taiwan  are  described  as  new  to  science,  based  on  the  specimens  col- 
lected by  Dr.  Ignac  Sivec  and  Dr.  Bogdan  Horvat.  The  hamatus-group  is  charac- 
terized by  the  black  antenna,  postocular  bristles  entirely  black,  hind  femur  with 
black  tip,  R4+5  and  M  distinctly  convergent  apically,  male  cercus  rather  small, 
subtriangular  and  usually  with  several  finger-like  marginal  processes  bearing 
bristles,  and  hypandrium  irregularly  furcated  (Wei,  1997).  The  type  specimens 
are  deposited  in  the  Slovenian  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Ljubljana. 

The  following  abbreviations  are  used:  acr  -  acrostichal  setae,  ad  -  anterodor- 
sal  setae,  av  -  anteroventral  setae,  dc  -  dorsocentral  setae,  LI  -  fore  leg,  LII  - 
mid  leg,  LIII  -  hind  leg,  pd  -  posterodorsal  setae,  pv  -  posteroventral  setae,  v  - 
ventral  setae. 

Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  chiaiensis,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-5) 

Diagnosis:  First  flagellomere  nearly  as  long  as  wide;  arista  subapical.  LI  with 
3rd  to  5th  tarsomeres  flattened  and  black  except  5th  tarsomere  white  with  black 


1  Submitted  on  September  11,  2004.  Accepted  on  September  20,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Hntomology,  China  Agricultural  University,  Yuanmingyuan  West  Road.  Beijing 
100094,  China.  E-mail  (LZ):  tolily<</  1 26. com.  E-mail  (DY):  yangdcau@yahoo.com.cn  or  dyangcau 
@yahoo.com.cn  (to  whom  correspondence  and  reprint  requests  should  be  addressed). 

:  Key  Lab  of  Insect  Evolution  &  Environmental  Changes,  Capital  Normal  University.  Beijing  100037 
China. 

'Lake  Biwa  Museum,  1091  Oroshimo-cho,  Kusatsu-shi,  Shiga,  525-0001  Japan.  E-mail:  moai  </ 
lbm.go.jp. 

Mailed  on  February  3,  2005 


220 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


base  and  some  white  hairs.  Male  cercus  nearly  quadrate  without  finger-like  mar- 
ginal process. 

Description:  Male.  Body  length  3.4  mm,  wing  length  3.4  mm.  Head  metallic  green  with  pale 
gray  pollen.  Face  narrowing  ventrally,  narrower  than  1st  flagellomere.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  head 
black;  postocular  bristles  entirely  black.  Antenna  (Fig.  2)  black  with  wide  ventral  area  of  scape 
brownish  yellow;  1st  flagellomere  short,  nearly  as  long  as  wide,  obtuse  apically;  arista  black,  sub- 
apical,  minutely  pubescent,  with  rather  short  basal  segment.  Proboscis  yellow  with  black  hairs;  pal- 
pus yellow  with  black  hairs  and  1  black  apical  bristle. 

Thorax  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  thorax  black;  6  strong  dc,  7 
irregularly  paired  acr;  scutellum  with  one  pair  of  strong  bristles.  Propleuron  black  haired  with  1  black 
bristle  on  lower  portion.  Legs  yellow;  coxa  I  yellow,  coxa  II  and  III  dark  brown.  Femur  III  with  black 
tip.  Tarsus  I  with  tarsomeres  3-5  (Fig.  3)  flattened,  black  except  5th  tarsomere  white  with  black  base 
and  white  hairs;  tarsus  II  from  tip  of  2nd  tarsomere  onward  black;  tarsus  III  from  tip  of  1st  tarsomere 
onward  black.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  legs  black,  coxa  II  and  III  each  with  1  outer  bristle,  femur  II  and 
III  each  with  1  preapical  bristle.  Tibia  I  with  1  ad  and  2  thin  pd,  apically  with  4  short  bristles;  tibia  II 
with  3  ad  and  2  pd,  apically  with  4  bristles;  tibia  III  with  3  ad,  4  pd  and  3  thin  v,  apically  with  3  bris- 


Figs  1-5.  Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  chiaiensis  sp.  nov.  1,  wing;  2,  antenna,  lateral 
view;  3,  tarsomeres  2-5  of  LI,  lateral  view;  4,  male  genitalia  (excluding  cercus),  lateral 
view;  5,  cercus,  lateral  view. 


Vol.  115,  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 221 


ties.  Relative  lengths  of  tibia  and  5  tarsomeres  LI  1.5  :  0.8  :  0.65  :  0.3  :  0.2  :  0.2;  LII  2.0:  1.0  :  0.55 
:  0.4  :  0.25:  0.25;  LIII  2.5:  0.5  :  0.9:  0.5:  0.3  :  0.25.  Wing  (Fig.  1)  hyaline,  tinged  with  grayish;  veins 
brown.  R4+5  and  M  distinctly  convergent  apically;  CuAx  ratio  (length  of  m-cu/length  of  CuA  distal 
section)  0.5.  Squama  yellow  with  brown  hairs.  Halter  yellow. 

Abdomen  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Male  genitalia  (Fig.  4-5):  Epandrium  distinctly 
longer  than  wide,  with  two  lateral  lobes  spine-like  and  strongly  curved;  cercus  subquadrate  without 
marginal  processes  (Fig.  5);  hypandrium  thick  and  irregularly  furcated. 

Female.  Unknown. 

Holotype:  Male,  Taiwan:  Chiai  county,  1160m,  23°29'22"N,  120°41'38"E,  1996.X.21,  Ignac 
Sivec. 

Distribution:  Taiwan  (Chiai). 

Etymology:  The  specific  name  refers  to  the  type  locality  Taiwan,  Chiai  County. 

Remarks:  The  new  species  is  somewhat  similar  to  H.  dissimilis  Yang  and 
Saigusa  in  having  leg  I  with  3rd  to  4th  tarsomeres  flattened,  but  may  be  separat- 
ed from  the  latter  by  the  arista  being  nearly  apical  and  leg  I  with  the  5th  tar- 
somere  flattened  and  white  with  a  black  base.  In  H.  dissimilis,  the  arista  is  dor- 
sal, and  the  5th  tarsomere  of  leg  I  is  entirely  white  and  not  flattened  as  are  the 
3rd  to  4th  tarsomeres  (Yang  and  Saigusa,  1999). 


Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  hualienensis,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  6-9) 

Diagnosis:  First  flagellomere  1.4  times  longer  than  wide;  arista  apical.  Ab- 
dominal sternite  4  with  a  ventral  process.  Hypandrium  irregularly  furcated  with 

several  small  inner  denticles  near  base. 

Description:  Male.  Body  length  3.6-3.7  mm,  wing  length  3.6-3.7  mm.  Head  metallic  green  with 
pale  gray  pollen.  Face  narrowing  ventrally,  narrower  than  1st  flagellomere.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  head 
black;  postocular  bristles  entirely  black.  Antenna  (Fig.  7)  black  with  wide  ventral  area  of  scape 
brownish  yellow;  1  st  flagellomere  short,  1 .4  times  longer  than  wide,  obtuse  apically;  arista  black,  api- 
cal, minutely  pubescent,  with  very  short  basal  segment.  Proboscis  dark  yellow  with  black  hairs;  pal- 
pus dark  yellow  with  black  hairs  and  1  black  apical  bristle. 

Thorax  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  thorax  black;  6  strong  dc,  6-7 
irregularly  paired  acr;  scutellum  with  2  pairs  of  bristles  (basal  pair  short  and  hair-like)  and  several 
short  pale  hairs  on  disc  and  marginal  hairs.  Propleuron  black  haired  with  1  black  bristle  on  lower  por- 
tion. Legs  yellow;  coxa  I  yellow,  coxa  II  and  III  blackish  brown.  Femur  III  with  black  tip.  Tibia  III 
with  brownish  tip.  Tarsus  I  and  II  from  tip  of  1st  tarsomere  onward  dark  brown  to  black;  tarsus  III 
black.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  legs  black,  coxa  II  and  III  each  with  1  outer  bristle,  femur  II  and  III  each 
with  1  preapical  bristle,  femur  II  with  1  pv  at  tip.  Tibia  I  with  1  thin  ad  and  2  pd;  tibia  II  with  3  ad 
and  2  pd,  apically  with  4  bristles;  tibia  III  with  4  ad  and  4  pd,  apically  with  3  bristles.  Relative  lengths 
of  tibia  and  5  tarsomeres  LI  2.0  :  1.05  :  0.9  :  0.5  :  0.25  :  0.25;  LII  3.0:  1.5  :  1.0  :  0.55  :  0.35:  0.25; 
LIII  3.5:  0.85  :  1.0:  0.5:  0.6  :  0.55.  Wing  (Fig.  6)  hyaline,  tinged  with  grayish;  veins  brown.  R4+5 
and  M  distinctly  convergent  apically;  CuAx  ratio  0.6.  Squama  yellow  with  black  hairs.  Halter  yel- 
low. 

Abdomen  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Sternite  4  with  a  short,  subtriangular  ventral 
process.  Male  genitalia  (Figs.  8-9):  Epandrium  longer  than  wide,  lateral  lobe  long  and  thick,  bearing 
3  apical  bristles;  cercus  (Fig.  9)  with  2  finger-like  processes;  aedeagus  curved  apically;  hypandrium 
irregularly  furcated  with  several  inner  denticles  near  base. 

Female.  Body  length  4.2-4.4  mm.  Wing  length  4.1-4.2  mm.  Similar  to  male,  but  sternite  4  with- 
out ventral  process. 

Holotype:  Male.  Taiwan:  Hualien  county.  Nanan.  200  m,  23°18'47"N.  12ri5'37"E,  1996.  V.  4. 
Ignac  Sivec  and  Bogdan  Horvat.  Paratypes:  2cfd1.  Taiwan:  Hualien  county,  Nanan,  200  m. 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


23°18'47"N,  121°15'37"E,  1996.  V.  4,  Ignac  Sivec  and  Bogdan  Horvat;  2cfcf,  Taiwan:  Chiai  county, 
1160  m,  23°29'22"N,  120°41'38"E,  1996.  X.  21,  Ignac  Sivec;  9Cfcf499,  Taiwan:  Taipei  county,  S 
Vuiai,  330  m.  24°50'03"N,  121°31'56"E,  1996.  III.  15,  Ignac  Sivec  and  Bogdan  Horvat;  ICf  19,  Tai- 
wan: Taichung  county,  Wushihkang,  720  m.  1996.  X.  18,  Ignac  Sivec. 

Distribution:  Taiwan  (Hualien,  Taipei,  Chiai,  Taichung). 

Etymology:  The  specific  name  refers  to  the  type  locality  Taiwan,  Hualien  county. 

Remarks:  The  new  species  differs  from  other  species  of  the  hamatus-group 
by  the  hypandrium  bearing  small  inner  denticles  near  base. 


Figs  6-9.  Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  hualienensis  sp.  nov.  6,  wing;  7,  antenna,  lateral 
view;  8,  male  genitalia  (excluding  cercus),  lateral  view;  9,  cercus,  lateral  view. 


Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  taitungensis,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  10-14) 

Diagnosis:  First  flagellomere  nearly  as  long  as  wide;  arista  nearly  apical.  LI 

with  5th  tarsomere  white.  Abdominal  sternite  4  with  a  ventral  process. 
Description:   Male.  Body  length  2.9-3.0  mm,  wing  length  2.6-2.8  mm. 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 


223 


Figs  10-14.  Hercostomus  (Hercostomus)  taitungensis  sp.  nov.  10,  wing;  11,  antenna,  lat- 
eral view;  12,  male  genitalia  (excluding  cercus),  lateral  view;  13,  male  genitalia,  ventral 
view;  14,  cercus,  lateral  view. 


Head  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Face  narrowing  ventrally,  narrower  than  1st  tlagellomere. 
Hairs  and  bristles  on  head  black;  postocular  bristles  entirely  black.  Antenna  (Fig.  1 1 )  black  with  wide 
ventral  area  of  scape  brownish  yellow;  1st  flagellomere  short,  nearly  as  long  as  wide,  obtuse  apical- 
ly;  arista  black,  subapical,  minutely  pubescent,  with  rather  short  basal  segment.  Proboscis  dark  yel- 
low with  black  hairs;  palpus  brown  with  black  hairs  and  I  black  apical  bristle. 

Thorax  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  thorax  black;  6  strong  dc,  6-7 
irregularly  paired  acr;  scutellum  with  2  pair  of  bristles  (basal  pair  short  and  hair-like).  Propleuron 
black  haired  with  1  black  bristle  on  lower  portion.  Legs  yellow;  coxa  I  yellow,  coxa  II  and  III  black- 
ish brown.  Femur  III  with  black  tip.  Tibia  III  with  brownish  tip.  Tarsus  I  from  tip  of  1st  tarsomere 
onward  brown  except  5th  tarsomere  white;  tarsus  II  from  tip  of  1st  tarsomere  onward  black;  tarsus 
III  entirely  black.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  legs  black,  coxa  II  and  III  each  \\ith  I  outer  bristle,  femur  II 
and  III  each  with  1  preapical  bristle,  femur  II  with  1  apical  pv.  Tibia  I  with  1  thin  ad  and  2  thin  pd. 
apically  with  2  short  bristles;  tibia  II  with  3  ad  and  2  pd.  apically  with  4  bristles;  tibia  III  with  4  ad. 


224  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


4  pd  and  3  thin  v,  apically  with  3  bristles.  Relative  lengths  of  tibia  and  5  tarsomeres  LI  1.5  :  0.9  :  0.5 
:  0.3  :  0.2  :  0.2;  LII  2.0:  1.0  :  0.65  :  0.5  :  0.3:  0.2;  LIII  2.6:  0.7  :  0.85:  0.5:  0.3  :  0.3.  Wing  (Fig.  10) 
hyaline,  tinged  with  grayish;  veins  brown.  R4+5  and  M  distinctly  convergent  apically;  CuAx  ratio 
0.6.  Squama  yellow  with  black  hairs.  Halter  yellow. 

Abdomen  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Sternite  4  with  a  short,  subtriangular  ventral 
process.  Male  genitalia  (Fig.  12-14):  Epandrium  longer  than  wide  with  lateral  lobe  bearing  2  apical 
bristles;  cercus  (Fig.  14)  with  3  finger-like  processes;  aedeagus  curved  apically;  hypandrium  irregu- 
larly furcated,  with  a  strong  curved  lateral  spine  near  base. 

Female.  Body  length  2.8-3.0  mm,  wing  length  2.6-2.8  mm.  Similar  to  male,  except  tarsi  of  LI 
from  tip  of  1st  tarsomere  onward  brown  and  sternite  4  without  ventral  process. 

Holotype:  Male,  Taiwan:  Taitung  county,  S  Lital,  810m.  23°10'52"N,  121001'32"E,  1996.  IV.  4, 
Ignac  Sivec  and  Bogdan  Horvat.  Paratypes:  lcf299>  Taiwan:  Chiai  county,  1160  m,  23°29'22"N, 
120041'38"E,  1996.  X.  21,  Ignac  Sivec;  icf,  Taiwan:  Taipei  county,  S  Vulai,  330  m,  24°50'03"N, 
121°31'56"E,  1996.  III.  15,  Ignac  Sivec  and  Bogdan  Horvat;  lcf299.  Taiwan:  Hualien  county,  200 
m,  1996.  IV.  14,  Ignac  Sivec  and  Bogdan  Horvat. 

Distribution:  Taiwan  (Taitung,  Chiai,  Taipei,  Hualien). 

Etymology:  The  specific  name  refers  to  the  type  locality  Taiwan,  Taitung  county. 

Remarks:  The  new  species  is  somewhat  similar  to  H.  dissectus  Yang  and  Sai- 
gusa  in  having  leg  I  with  3rd  and  4th  tarsomeres  black  and  5th  tarsomere  white, 
and  the  hypandrium  bearing  a  strong  curved  lateral  spine  near  the  base,  but  may 
be  separated  from  the  latter  by  the  arista  being  subapical.  In  H.  dissectus,  the 
arista  is  dorsal  (Yang  and  Saigusa,  1999). 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  are  very  grateful  to  Dr.  Ignac  Sivec  and  Bogdan  Horvat  (Slovenian  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  Ljubljana)  for  kindly  providing  the  specimens.  This  research  is  supported  by  the  National 
Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (No.  30225009). 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Dyte,  D.  E.  1975.  Family  Dolichopodidae.  In,  Delfinado,  M.  D.  and  D.  E.  Hardy  (Editors).  A  Cata- 
log of  the  Diptera  of  the  Oriental  region  2:  212-258.  University  Press  of  Hawaii.  Honolulu,  Oahu, 
Hawaii,  U.S.A.  459  pp. 

Negrobov,  O.  P.  1991.  Family  Dolichopodidae.  pp.  11-139.  //;,  Soos,  A.  and  Papp,  L.  (Editors). 
Catalogue  of  Palaearctic  Diptera.  Volume  7.  Akademiai  Kiado,  Budapest,  Hungary.  291  pp. 

Wei,  L.  1997.  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from  Southwest  China  II.  A  study  of  the  genus  Hercos- 
tnnnis  Loew,  1857.  Journal  of  Guizhou  Agricultural  College  16(2):36-50. 

Yang,  D.  1996.  New  species  of  Hercostomus  and  Lndovicius  from  North  China  (Diptera:  Doli- 
chopodidae). Deutsche  Entomologische  Zeitschrift  43(2):235-244. 

Yang,  D.  1997a.  New  species  of  Amblypsilopus  and  Hercostomus  from  China  (Diptera:  Doli- 
chopodidae). Bulletin  de  I'lnstitut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie 
67:131-140. 

Yang,  D.  1997b.  Five  new  Species  of  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from  Longwang  Mountain.  Zhe- 
jiang.  Southeastern  China.  Deutsche  Entomologische  Zeitschrift  44(2):  147-153. 

Yang,  D.  and  P.  Grootaert.  1999.  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera:  Empidoidea)  from  Xishuangbanna 
(China,  Yunnan  province):  the  Dolichopodinae  and  the  genus  Chaetogonoptemn  (I).  Bulletin  de 
I'lnstitut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie  69:251-277. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  1999.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  from  China  (VI): 
Diptera  from  Emei  Mountain  (I).  Bulletin  de  I'lnstitut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Bel- 
gique, Entomologie  69:233-250. 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 225 


Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2000.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  from  China  (VII): 
Diptera  from  Emei  Mountain  (2).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Bel- 
gique,  Entomologie  70:219-242. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2001a.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from 
China  (VIII).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie  71 : 
155-164. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2001b.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from 
China  (IX).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie 

71:165-188. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  200 Ic.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from 
China  (X).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie  71:189- 
236. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2001d.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from 
China  (XI).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie 

71:237-256. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2002.  The  species  of  Hercostomus  from  the  Qinling  Mountains  of 
Shaanxi,  China.  (Diptera,  Empidoidea,  Dolichopodidae).  Deutsche  Entomologische  Zeitschrift 
49(1):  61-88. 

Yang,  D.  and  C.  K.  Yang.  1995.  Diptera:  Dolichopodidae.  In,  Wu,  H.  (Editor).  Insects  of  Baishanzu 
Mountain.  Eastern  China,  pp.  510-519.  China  Forestry  Publishing  House,  Beijing,  China.  586  pp. 

Yang,  D,  C.  K.  Yang,  and  Li  Z.  1998.  Three  new  species  of  Dolichopodidae  from  Henan.  //;,  Shen. 
X,  C  and  Shi,  Z.  Y  (Editors).  The  Fauna  and  Taxonomy  of  Insects  in  Henan  Volume  2.  pp.  81-84. 
China  Agricultural  Scientech  Press.  Beijing,  China.  368  pp. 

Zhang,  L.  L  and  D.  Yang.  2003a.  Notes  on  the  genus  Hercostomus  Loew,  1857  from  Guangxi, 
China  (Diptera:  Empidoidea:  Dolichopodidae).  Annales  Zoologici  53(4):  657-661. 

Zhang,  L.  L  and  D.  Yang.  2003b.  New  species  of  Chrysotimus  and  Hercostomus  from  Beijing 
(Diptera:  Dolichopodidae).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique, 
Entomologie  73: 189- 194. 

Zhang,  L.  L  and  D.  Yang.  2003c.  Notes  on  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from  Guangdong,  China. 
Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie  71:181-188. 


226  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  AMPHINEMURA 
(PLECOPTERA:  NEMOURIDAE)  FROM  CHINA1 

Ding  Yang,2 -'  Weihai  Li,2  and  Fang  Zhir 

ABSTRACT:  Amphinemura  guangdongensis  sp.  n.,  a  new  species  of  the  family  Nemouridae  is  des- 
cribed from  China,  and  its  relationships  are  discussed  on  the  Chinese  species. 

KEY  WORDS:  Plecoptera,  Nemouridae,  Amphinemura,  new  species,  China 

The  genus  Amphinemura  is  distributed  in  the  Holarctic  and  Oriental  regions 
(Baumann,  1975).  It  currently  contains  about  120  species  worldwide,  including 
37  from  China.  The  species  of  Amphinemura  from  China  were  studied  mainly  by 
Wu  (1938,  1962,  1973)  and  Zhu  and  Yang  (2002,  2003). 

The  present  paper  deals  with  one  new  species  of  the  genus  Amphinemura  from 
China.  The  material  studied  is  deposited  in  the  Insect  Collection  of  China  Agri- 
cultural University,  Beijing,  and  all  of  the  specimens  are  preserved  in  75  percent 
alcohol.  The  morphological  terminology  generally  follows  that  of  Baumann 
(1975). 

Amphinemura  guangdongensis  Yang,  Li  and  Zhu,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-5) 

Diagnosis:  Epiproct  with  a  pair  of  large  anterolateral  spines  that  curved  out- 
ward and  a  sharp  apical  process  extended  from  its  ventral  sclerite.  Median  lobe 
of  paraproct  furcated  into  a  slender  projection  and  wide  setous  hump. 

Description:  Male:  Body  length  7.0-8.5  mm;  forewing  length  9.4-9.6  mm,  hindwing  length  7.8- 
8.1  mm. 

Head  dark  brown;  antennae  dark  brown;  mouthparts  dark  brown.  Thorax  dark  brown;  pronotum 
uniformly  dark  brown.  Wings  hyaline,  tinged  with  grayish.  Legs  brown,  except  femora  brownish  yel- 
low to  dark  brownish  yellow  and  tibiae  with  dark  brown  basal  portion.  Abdomen  brownish;  hypopy- 
gium  including  cerci  dark  brown;  hairs  on  abdomen  mostly  pale. 

Terminalia  (Figs.  1-5):  Tergite  9  weakly  sclerotized,  rather  constricted  medially,  with  large  trian- 
gular mid-anterior  incision  and  weak  mid-posterior  incision,  and  with  two  groups  of  several  black 
tiny  spines  at  mid-posterior  margin.  Stemite  9  with  slender  vesicle;  subgenital  plate  rather  wide 
basal ly,  then  distinctly  tapering  toward  tip.  Tergite  10  weakly  sclerotized  except  basal  margin  dis- 
tinctly sclerotized,  with  a  rather  large  and  shallow  median  concavity  bearing  several  tiny  black  spines 
closely  located  along  anterolateral  margin  and  a  large  black  spine  with  3  tiny  spines  at  mid-lateral 
margin.  Cercus  slightly  sclerotized,  long  and  nearly  cylindrical.  Epiproct  with  a  pair  of  large  antero- 
lateral spines  that  curved  outward  and  a  sharp  apical  process  extended  from  its  ventral  sclerite. 
Paraproct  divided  into  three  lobes:  outer  lobe  distinctly  sclerotized,  much  shorter  than  median  lobe, 
distinctly  curved  and  finger-like;  median  lobe  weakly  sclerotized,  well  developed,  apically  distinct- 
ly sclerotized,  strongly  curved  upward  and  forward,  with  rather  wide  and  furcated  tip,  and  with  one 


1  Received  on  July  1,  2004.  Accepted  on  July  12,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Entomology,  China  Agricultural  University,  2  Yuanmingyuan  West  Road,  Beijing 
100094,  China.  E-mail:  yangdingtocau. edu.cn  or  dyangcau(«  yahoo.com.cn. 

'  Key  Lab  of  Insect  Evolution  &   Environmental  Changes,  Capital  Normal  University,  Beijing 
100037,  China. 

Mailed  on  February  3,  2005 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 


227 


Figures  1-5.  Amphinemura  guangdongensis  sp  nov.,  male.  1,  genitalia,  dorsal  view;  2 
genitalia,  ventral  view;  3,  epiproct,  posterior  view;  4,  epiproct,  lateral  view;  5,  para- 
proct. 


228  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


row  of  black  tiny  spines  along  dorsal  ridge;  inner  lobe  weakly  sclerotized,  nearly  as  long  as  outer 
lobe,  more  or  less  straight,  with  acute  tip. 

Female:  Unknown. 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  male,  Guangdong,  Ruyuan,  Nanling  National  Natural  Reserve,  2003.  III. 
25,  Ding  Yang.  Paratypes:  1  male,  Guangdong,  Yingde,  Shimentai  National  Forest  Garden,  2003.  III. 
29,  Ding  Yang;  9  males,  Zhejiang,  Qingyuan,  Baishanzu  National  Nature  Reserve  (1300  m),  1994. 
IV.  18,  Hong  Wu. 

Etymology:  The  species  is  named  after  its  type  locality,  Guangdong. 

DISCUSSION 

The  new  species  have  distinctively  sclerotized  processes  on  the  epiproct.  This 
feature  can  be  found  also  in  some  Chinese  species,  e.g.,  A.  sinensis  (Wu,  1926), 
A.  chid  (Wu,  \935),A.fleurdelia  (Wu,  1949),  and  A  trifurcata  (Wu,  1949).  They 
would  be  related  to  each  other,  but  A.  fleurdelia  can  be  separated  from  the  other 
four  species  in  having  the  slender  ventral  sclerite  on  epiproct.  The  new  species  is 
closely  related  to  A.  sinensis  in  the  ventral  sclerite  on  epiproct  projected  forward 
apically  in  the  lateral  view  while  the  ventral  sclerite  on  epiproct  is  truncate  api- 
cally  in  the  lateral  view  in  A  trifurcata  and  A.  chid,  but  can  be  distinguished  from 
A.  sinensis  by  the  ventral  sclerite  with  long  dorsal  process  curved  forward.  In 
A.  sinensis,  the  dorsal  process  of  the  ventral  sclerite  is  short  and  curved  upward. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  are  very  indebted  to  Prof.  Zaifu  Xu  (Guangzhou),  Prof.  Chi-kun  Yang  and  Ms.  Shuwen  An 
(Beijing),  and  Dr.  I.  Sivec  (Ljubljana)  for  their  kind  help  in  many  ways.  The  research  was  supported 
by  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (No.  30225009). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Baumann,  R.  W.   1975.  Revision  of  the  stonefly  family  Nemouridae  (Plecoptera):  A  study  of  the 
world  fauna  at  the  generic  level.  Smithsonian  Contributions  Zoology  211:  1-74. 

Wu,  C.  F.   1926.  Two  new  species  of  stoneflies  from  Nanking.  China  Journal  of  Science  and  Arts  5: 
331-332. 

Wu,  C.  F.   1938.  Plecopterorum  sinensium:  A  monograph  of  stoneflies  of  China  (Order  Plecoptera) 

Peiping.  225  pp. 

Wu,  C.  F.   1962.  Results  of  the  Zoologico-Botanical  expedition  to  Southwest  China,  1955-1957 
(Plecoptera).  Acta  Entomologica  Sinica  11  (Supplement):  139-153,  plates  I-VII. 

Wu,  C.  F.   1973.  New  species  of  Chinese  stoneflies  (Order  Plecoptera).  Acta  Entomologica  Sinica 

16(2):  97-118. 

Zhu,  F.  and  D.  Yang.  2002.  Three  new  species  ofAniphinenntru  from  China  (Plecoptera:  Nemour- 
idae). Acta  Zootaxonomica  Sinica  27:  745-749. 

Zhu,  F.  and  D.  Yang.  2003.  Three  new  species  of  Amphinemura  (Plecoptera:  Nemouridae)  from 
Tibet.  Entomologia  Sinica  10(1):  51-56. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 229 

A  NEW  GENUS  AND  SPECIES  OF  ENTOMOBRYIDAE 

(COLLEMBOLA,  ENTOMOBRYOMORPHA) 

FROM  THE  IBERIAN  PENINSULA 

Enrique  Baquero,:  Maite  .Martinez,2  Kenneth  Christiansen,'  and  Rafael  Jordana2 

ABSTRACT:  A  new  genus  and  species,  Hispanobryu  hairancoi  Jordana  and  Baquero,  gen.  n.,  sp.  n. 
is  described.  It  was  found  in  the  Gador  Mountain  range  (Almeria,  Spain).  This  genus  is  similar  to 
Capbrya  Barra,  1999,  from  South  Africa.  The  distinguishing  characteristics  of  the  new  genus  are  the 
presence  of  a  post-antennal  organ  (PAO),  no  clear  tenent  hair,  a  characteristic  unguis,  the  presence  of 
a  reduced  trochanteral  organ,  and  flattened  body  setae.  The  distribution  of  the  bothriotricha  is  simi- 
lar to  that  of  the  genus  Capbrya. 

KEY  WORDS:  Collembola,  Entomobryomorpha,  Entomobryidae,  Hispanobtya  gen.  n.,  Spain, 
Iberian  Peninsula 

Specimens  of  an  undescribed  collembolan  with  characteristics  of  both  the 
families  Entomobryidae  and  Isotomidae  were  found  during  a  study  of  the  cave 
fauna  of  Almeria  (south  of  Iberian  Peninsula).  Their  habitus,  length  of  abdomi- 
nal segments  III  and  IV,  presence  of  PAO  led  to  an  initial  identification  as 
Isotomurus.  Detailed  study,  including  SEM  (Scanning  Electron  Microscopy) 
observation,  allowed  us  to  see  characters  not  visible  under  the  light  microscope. 
These  details  included  the  eye  fine  structure,  claw,  unguiculus,  and  body  sculp- 
ture. As  a  result  of  this  study  it  became  clear  that  these  specimens  were  a  new 
genus  similar  to  the  genus  Capbiya  Barra,  1999,  from  South  Africa. 

METHODS 

The  specimens  were  collected  in  the  "Paraje  Natural  Karst  en  Yesos  de 
Sorbas"  in  Almeria,  Spain.  The  plant  community  of  the  "Paraje  Natural  Karst  en 
Yesos  de  Sorbas"  is  gypsophilous  and  is  dominated  by  small  bushes  of  Thymus 
spp.  (thyme,  Lamiaceae).  There  are  few  other  plants  near  these.  In  the  more  open 
regions,  where  the  thyme  is  less  dense,  there  is  a  scattering  of  annual  plants  (La- 
zaro,  1986).  The  remaining  soil  is  covered  mainly  by  lichens,  which  cover  about 
90  percent  of  the  gypsum  surface.  The  predominant  lichen  community  is  Helian- 
terno  alypoidis-Gypsophiletum  stnithii  (Rivas-Goday  and  Esteve,  1965). 

Samples  were  taken  in  the  spring,  summer  and  autumn,  but  Hispanobrya  gen. 
n.  was  found  only  in  the  spring  and  summer.  Specimens  were  preserved  in  70 
percent  ethanol.  Some  specimens  were  mounted  on  slides  using  'Hoyer  medi- 
um,' whereas  others  were  dehydrated  using  an  ethanol  series  followed  by  criti- 
cal-point drying  in  CO2,  mounted  on  aluminum  SEM  stubs,  and  coated  in  Argon 


1  Received  on  August  4,  2004.  Accepted  on  October  20,  2004. 

'Department  of  Zoology  and  Exology,  University  of  Navarra,  P.  O.  Box  177,  310SO  Pamplona, 
Navarra,  Spain.  Corresponding  author:  Enrique  Baquero,  ebaquerofaunav.es.  Maite  Martinez, 
mmartin4(«  alumni.unav.es;  Rafael  Jordana,  rjordanafa  unav.es. 

3Grinnel  college,  Grinnell,  Iowa  50112  U.S.A.  christak(«  grinnell.edu. 

Mailed  on  Kebruary  3.  2005 


230  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


atmosphere  with  16  nm  of  gold  in  an  Emitech  K550  sputter-coater.  SEM  obser- 
vations were  made  in  a  Zeiss  DSM  940  A.  Abbreviations:  MZNA,  Museum  of 
Zoology,  University  of  Navarra. 

In  addition  to  direct  capture,  specimens  were  captured  with  two  types  of  pit- 
fall traps.  One,  containing  a  solution  of  water  and  chloral  hydrate  (10g/l),  was 
collected  after  24  hours.  A  second  type  had  a  mesh  and  200  g  of  sheep/goat 
manure  without  preservative.  The  specimens  in  these  traps  were  collected  direct- 
ly after  48  hours,  with  an  ethanol  wetted  paintbrush. 

Hispanobrya  Jordana  and  Baquero,  NEW  GENUS 

Diagnosis:  Body  without  scales.  Abdominal  tergite  IV  1.72  times  as  long  as 
abdominal  tergite  III  (1.6-1.9;  n=6).  First  antennal  segment  undivided,  fourth 
antennal  segment  with  apical  vesicle  but  without  a  laminar  projection.  7+7 
ommatidia  with  reticulated  cornea,  and  a  very  poor  developed  8th  ommatidium. 
Its  cornea  are  almost  invisible  with  the  SEM,  but  the  ommatidium  lens  is  barely 
visible  under  light  microscopy.  The  PAO  is  in  the  form  of  a  protruding  vesicle 
with  a  perforated  cavity  on  top  (Fig.  1  A).  There  are  no  clear  tenent  hairs  on  legs. 
A  reduced  trochanteral  organ  is  present  in  leg  III.  The  formula  of  trichobothria  is 
2,  3,  2  on  abdominal  tergites  II,  III  and  IV. 

Type  species.  Hispanobiya  barrancoi  sp.  n.  Jordana  and  Baquero. 
Etymology.  The  generic  name  refers  to  the  geographical  region  (Hispania, 
Latin  for  the  Iberian  Peninsula). 

Hispanobrya  barrancoi  Jordana  and  Baquero,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-4) 

Description.  Total  length  without  appendages  0.7-1.0  mm  (n=20)  (holotype,  0.95  mm)  (Fig.  IB). 
Background  color  whitish,  with  some  pigment  on  head  and  antennae,  and  bands  covering  most  of  the 
tergites  of  all  segments.  Under  SEM  the  body  presents  a  very  uniform  reticular  pattern,  consisting  of 
large  hexagonal  cells  with  primary  tubercles  at  the  corners  (Fig.  1A,C). 

Antennae  longer  than  head  (holotype  antenna/head  ratio  2.2).  Length  of  antennae  segments  (holo- 
type): 0.07:0.11:0.12:0.14  (Fig.  3A,B).  Antennal  segments  II  and  III  similar  in  length.  Antenna  with 
abundant  sensillae  (about  50)  of  three  types:  1)  short,  cylindrical,  blunt  and  smooth;  2)  long  (two 
times  the  preceding)  and  smooth  (Fig.  1C);  3)  longer  and  serrated  asymmetrically.  Antennae  segment 
IV  with  extrusible  apical  vesicle  but  without  laminar  projection.  Antennae  segment  III  with  fewer 
sensory  setae  than  segment  IV,  and  an  apical  organ  with  two  leaf-like  perforate  sensory  organs  (Fig. 
3C).  Antennal  segment  II  with  fewer  sensillae  than  III.  Antennal  segment  I  with  two  basal  sensillae 
on  dorsal  side,  and  five  basal  sensillae  on  ventral  side. 

Head.  The  PAO  is  a  protruding  vesicle  (20  x  10  micra  in  a  Paratype)  with  a  perforated  cavity  on 
top  ( 1 1 .5  x  6.9  micra),  situated  in  front  of  the  eyes  A  and  B.  Under  SEM  the  cavity  of  the  PAO  shows 
perforations  (Fig.  1  A),  and  7+7  reticulated  ommatidia  can  be  observed.  The  G  ommatidia  cannot  be 
seen  under  the  SEM,  but  a  small  lens  can  be  seen  under  the  light  microscope.  A  large  number  of 
macrosetae  of  different  sizes  present  (Fig.  4B).  The  bothriotrichum  beside  the  eyes  is  present. 
Labrum  with  554  setae  (Fig.  4C).  Labral  papillae  smooth  with  an  anterior  row  of  short  blunt  setae. 
The  remaining  labral  setae  are  smooth  and  acuminate,  the  five  prelabrals  setae  ciliated.  The  labial 
setae  drawn  appear  like  a  typical  entomobryid  labial  triangle  with  the  Ml,  M2,  R,  E,  LI  and  L2  setae, 
all  similar  and  ciliate,  and  seta  a2  smooth  present  (Fig.  4B).  Labial  palps  with  five  basal  setae  (Fig. 
4D);  the  external  differentiated  papilla  has  a  blunt,  thickened  seta.  Venter  of  head  with  mesosetae  of 
varied  sizes. 

Body  chaetotaxy.  Microsensillae:  10/1000.  Sensillae:  12/02223,  thoracic  ones  lateral  but  those  of 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 


231 


Fig.  1.  Hispanobrya  barrancoi  (SEM  microphotographs).  A,  Detail  of  the  eyes  and  PAO 
(bar  =  10  micra).  B,  Lateral  habitus  (bar  =  100  micra).  C,  Two  types  of  sensillae  present 
on  the  antennal  segment  IV,  one  of  them  smooth  and  the  other  with  peculiar  spine-like 
projections,  very  difficult  to  see  under  light  microscope  (bar  =  2  micra).  D,  Mesosetae  and 
detail  (x4)  (bar  =  5  micra). 

abdominal  segments  III  and  IV  posterior  and  in  front  of  the  last  row  of  setae,  and  in  abdominal  seg- 
ment V  with  the  anterior  sensillae  three  times  as  long  as  the  posterior.  Pseudopores  on  thoracic  and 
abdominal  segments  I-IV.  Bothriotricha  on  abdominal  segments  II-IV  (2/3/2)  (Fig.  2C,4A).  There  are 
3+3  pubescent  setae  (type  2  from  Christiansen,  1958)  on  abdominal  segment  IV  similar  to  the  both- 
riotricha  but  thicker.  Macrosetae  similar  to  the  Entomobiya  type  1  setae  occur  on  the  thorax  and 
abdomen  but  are  somewhat  different  in  appearance  from  those  seen  in  the  genus  Entomobr\-a  (Fig. 
1D.3L).  The  rest  of  setae  are  more  flattened  with  6-8  rows  of  barbed  ridges;  the  basal  barbs  project 
out  laterally  more  than  the  distance  of  the  seta  width.  This  type  of  setae  are  14-46  micra  long. 
Macrosetae  present  on  head,  thoracic  segments  and  abdominal  segment  I  (Fig.  2A.4A).  Mesosetae  on 
abdominal  segments  II-YI  (Fig.  2B)  and  on  legs  up  to  25  micra  long.  Trochanteral  organ  on  leg  III 
has  four  smooth  setae  (Fig.  3D,E).  On  the  leg  HI  there  is  a  smooth  and  long  inner  seta.  Pretarsus  with 
a  single  anterior  seta.  The  unguis  (Fig.  3F-J)  with  three  longitudinal  ridges  extended  beyond  the  level 
of  the  basal  teeth,  with  the  central  ridge  longer  than  the  others,  inner  lamellae  joined  basal  to  apex 
forming  the  apical  tooth.  Between  the  basal  paired  teeth  and  the  anteapical  teeth  there  is  an  unpaired 


232 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Fig.  2.  Hispanobrya  barrancoi  (SEM  microphotographs).  A,  Macrosetae  on  the  thoracic 
segment  II  (bar  =  10  micra).  B,  Lateral  view  of  abdominal  segment  IV  (bar  =  30  micra). 
C,  Bothriotrichum  on  abdominal  segment  II.  (bar  =  5  micra).  D,  Lateral  view  of  the  fur- 
cula  and  detail  of  the  inucro  (inset  xlO)  (bar  =  20  micra). 

tooth.  The  unguiculus  is  half  as  long  as  the  unguis,  and  has  two  short  lateral  wings  but  no  terminal 
filament.  The  four  lamellae  have  a  strong  ridge.  The  lateral  flaps  of  the  ventral  tube  each  have  eight 
apical  setae,  only  one  being  smooth,  anteriorly  with  1  +  1  setae,  and  no  posterior  setae  (Fig.  3K.). 

Tenaculum  with  four  teeth  on  each  ramus,  and  a  single  seta  on  the  corpus  (Fig.  3M). 

Furca.  Manubrium  with  setae  similar  to  those  on  the  legs,  manubrial  plaque  with  two  pseudo- 
pores,  two  inner  setae  and  one  outer  seta  (Fig.  3N).  Denies  ringed  on  its  basal  two  thirds  (Fig.  2D), 
with  the  final  third  narrowed  and  striated  transversally,  and  with  three  subapical  setae  that  reach  the 
apex  of  the  mucro,  which  is  falciform  and  without  basal  spine. 

Type  Material.  Holotype.  Female,  SPAIN,  "Paraje  Natural  Karst  en  Yesos  de  Sorbas,"  Alineria, 
300  m  (UTM  co-ordinates  30SWG8308),  Mediterranean  maquia,  28  June  2002,  Ruiz-Portero  (pitfall 
trap)  code:  MZAL0164-02p  (slide)  (MZNA).  Paratypes.  Same  data  as  for  holotype,  MZAL0164-02 
(6  specimens  in  ethyl  alcohol),  MZAL0164-04p  (slide)  and  MZALO 164-03,  05,  06  (3  specimens  on 
2  SEM  stubs)  (MZNA). 

Other  material  studied.  Same  locality  as  for  holotype,  MZALO  1 50-03p  ( 1  specimen  on  slide),  9 
August  2002  (direct  capture  and  pitfall  trap);  MZAL01 5  l-02t  ( 1  specimen  in  ethyl  alcohol).  7  August 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 


233 


//I 


Fig.  3.  Hispunohiya  harrancoi.  A,  Antennae  dorsal  view.  B,  Antennae  ventral  \ie\\. 
C,  Detail  of  the  sensory  organ  of  antennal  segment  III.  D,  Leg  III.  E,  Trochanteral  organ. 
F-J,  Claw  rotation  to  show  its  structure.  K,  Ventral  tube  (collophore).  The  arrow  points  to 
the  head.  L,  Detail  of"  a  mesosetae  (type  IV,  Christiansen,  1958)  from  the  body. 
M,  Tenaculum.  N,  Furcula. 


234 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


2002,  (direct  capture  and  pitfall  trap);  MZAL0152-02t  (1  specimen  in  ethyl  alcohol),  14  June  2002 
(direct  capture  and  pitfall  trap);  MZAL0153-03t  (1  specimen  in  ethyl  alcohol),  26  June  2002  (direct 
capture  and  pitfall  trap);  MZAL0154-03t  ( 1  specimen  in  ethyl  alcohol),  17  May  2002  (direct  capture 
and  pitfall  trap);  MZAL0161-03t  (2  specimens  in  ethyl  alcohol),  3 1  May  2002  (direct  capture  and  pit- 
fall trap);  MZAL0162-03t  (4  specimens  in  ethyl  alcohol),  27  August  2002  (direct  capture); 

MZAL0163-03t  (1  specimen  in  ethyl 
alcohol),  6  May  2002  (direct  capture 
and  pitfall  trap)  Ruiz-Portero  (all 
MZNA). 

Etymology.  The  name  is 
dedicated  to  Dr.  Pablo  Barran- 


Fig.  4.  Hispanobiya  barrancoi.  A,  Body  dorsal 
chaetotaxy.  B,  Dorsal  (a)  and  ventral  (b)  head 
chaetotaxy.  C,  Labrum.  D,  Labial  papillae. 


co,  who  kindly  provided  the 
material. 


DISCUSSION 

Capbrya  Barra  from  South 
Africa  is  the  genus  most  simi- 
lar to  Hispanobiya.  Hispano- 
brya  is  similar  to  Capbtya  in 
habitus,  the  falciform  mucro, 
the  dentes  without  spines, 
crenulated  with  the  final  third 
striated  transversally,  the  num- 
ber and  position  of  the  bothri- 
otricha  and  type  2  setae  on 
abdominal  segment  IV,  the 
ratio  between  abdominal  ter- 
gites  III  and  IV,  the  general 
chaetotaxy  and  absence  of  a 
clear  tenent  hair.  It  differs  in 
claw  morphology,  the  sensory 
organ  on  antennal  segment  III, 
the  eye  number,  and  the  PAO. 
The  lack  of  SEM  figures  for 
the  antennae  of  Capbrya 
makes  comparison  of  the  sen- 
sory setae  difficult. 

Nothobiya  Arle,  1961  is 
similar  in  size  and  habitus,  but 
has  a  vesicular  PAO  and  six 
segmented  antennae  (Baquero 
et  al.,  2004).  The  setae  mor- 
phology and  distribution  are 
also  different. 


Vol.  115,  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004 235 

The  presence  of  PAO  of  Hispanobtya  Jordana  and  Baquero,  gen.  n.,  Capbrya 
and  Nothobtya  is  similar  to  Indoscopus  Prabhoo,  1971,  at  least  one  species  of 
Alloscopus  Borner,  1906  and  Australotomunis  Stach,  1947;  however,  the  other 
features  of  Hispanobrya  are  totally  unlike  those  found  in  these  genera.  The  PAO 
is  also  found  in  some  genera  of  Tomocerinae.  The  presence  of  type  1  setae,  the 
trochanteral  organ  on  leg  III  and  the  2-  3-  2  arrangement  of  bothriotricha  on 
abdominal  segments  II-IV,  as  well  as  the  habitus  indicate  that  all  three  genera 
belong  in  the  family  Entomobryidae  sensu  lato,  but  the  chaetotaxy,  the  detailed 
structure  of  the  setae  and  the  unusual  features  of  the  unguis  in  Hispanobrya  does 
not  fit  into  any  subfamily  as  they  are  presently  defined. 

These  discoveries  raise  two  important  questions:  1 )  what  does  the  discovery 
of  these  two  genera  in  two  such  disparate  localities  imply  and  2)  what  is  the 
impact  of  this  upon  the  suprageneric  classification  of  the  Entomobryidae  sensu 
lato. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  are  grateful  to  Dr.  Pablo  Barranco  (Department  of  Applied  Biology,  University  of  Almeria) 
for  the  material  object  of  the  study.  Stephanie  Peterson  assisted  in  the  preparation  of  the  manuscript. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Baquero,  E.,  R.  Jordana,  and  K.  Christiansen.  2004.  Redescription  of  Nothobrya  schubarti  Arle, 
1961  (Collembola,  Entomobryomorpha).  Entomological  News  115:  31-34. 

Barra,  J.-A.  1999.  Un  nouveau  genre  Capbrya  avec  deux  nouvelles  especes  de  la  Province  du  Cap 
(Rep.  Sud  Africaine)  (Collembola:  Entomobryidae).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  Des  Sciences 
Naturelles  de  Belgique  69:  19-24. 

Christiansen,  K.  A.  1958.  The  Nearctic  members  of  the  genus  Entomobrya  (Collembola).  Bulletin 
of  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  1 18:  440-545. 

Lazaro,  R.  1986.  Sobre  la  flora  y  vegetacion  gipsicola  almeriense  (Fanerogamas).  Boletin  del 
Institute)  de  Estudios  Almerienses  6:  131-150. 

Rivas-Goday,  S.  and  F.  Esteve.  1965.  Nuevas  comunidades  de  tomillares  del  sudeste  arido  iberi- 
co.  Anales  del  Institute)  Botanico  AJ  Cavanilles  23:  7-78. 


MEMOIRS 


OF     THE   AMERICAN    ENTOMOLOGICAL   SOCIETY 


NEW!  #44         A  Systematic  Database  of  Thereva 
Latreille  Names:  An  Answer  to  the  Nomenclatural 
Challenge  in  Therevidae  (Insecta:  Diptera) 
by  Kevin  C.  Holston.  86  pp $25 

NEW!  #45        A  Revision  of  the  Caryedontini 
(Coleoptera:  Bruchidae:  Pachymerinae)  of  Africa  and 
the  Middle  East  by  Clarence  Dan  Johnson,  Benjamin  J. 
Southgate  and  Alex  Delobel.  120  pp $30 


V 


#43 


A  World  Revision  of  the  Genus 


Spodoptera  Guenee  (Lepidoptera  Noctuidae) 
Michael  G.  Pogue.  2003.  202  pp $30 

A  complete  list  of  available  Memoirs  can  be  found  at 
www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/memoirs.html 


326 


NAME 


ADDRESS 


Please  send  these  issue(s): 

D  #45  ($25)  $ 
D  #44  ($30)  $ 
D  #43  ($30)  $ 

D# 


D  # 

$ 

$ 

CITY                                                                              STATE                      ZIP 

D# 

$ 

E-MAIL    (PLEASE  PRINT  CLEARLY) 

Postage: 
TOTAL 

$ 

TELEPHONE 

D  Check  or  money  order  (in  US  currency  through  a  US  bank) 
payable  to  The  American  Entomological  Society. 

Credit  card:     D  VISA      D  Discover     D  MasterCard     D  AmEx 


CREDIT  CARD  NUMBER 


EXPIRATION  DATE 


POSTAGE/ 
HANDLING: 
Domestic  orders: 

$3  for  the  first 
publication;  $1  for 
each  additional 
publication. 

Foreign  orders: 

$5  fee  for  the  first 
pLiblication;  $1  for 
each  additional 
publication. 

AES  Fed.  ID  No.: 
23-1599849 

MAIL  FORM  &  PAYMENT  TO: 

The  American  Entomological  Society 
at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1 195 

Telephone:  (2 15)  56 1-3978 
E-mail:  aes@acnatsci.org 


NAME  ON  CARD 


SIGNATURE 


www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes 


Vol.  115,  No.  4,  September  &  October  2004 237 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

FIRST  RECORD  OF 

MICROCEROTERMES  SERRULA  (DESNEUX) 

(ISOPTERA:  TERMITIDAE) 

IN  THAILAND1 

Richard  M.  Houseman2 

Our  knowledge  of  termite  biodiversity  in  Thailand  historically  has  been  lim- 
ited. Holmgren  (1913)  first  recorded  five  species  and  Snyder's  (1949)  cata- 
logue of  the  termites  of  the  world  listed  six.  It  was  not  until  Ahmad's  (1965) 
monograph  that  a  significant  survey  of  Thailand  termite  diversity  was  pub- 
lished. He  recorded  74  species  in  29  genera,  of  which  32  species  were  new  to 
science.  Later,  19  species  were  listed  by  Harris  (1968)  from  collections  made 
by  H.  Hillman  and  A.  Manjikul.  Morimoto  (1973)  reported  48  species  from  his 
collections  in  Thailand,  including  13  new  records  and  four  species  new  to  sci- 
ence. Based  on  all  published  records,  90  termite  species  in  29  genera  have  been 
reported  from  Thailand.  Most  published  records  are  from  north  of  the  Isthmus 
of  Kra,  while  a  few  collections  have  been  reported  from  the  southern  peninsu- 
lar region  of  Thailand. 

Five  species  of  Microcerotermes  have  been  reported  from  Thailand:  Micro- 
cerotermes  mimitus  Ahmad,  Microcerotermes  annandalei  Silvestri,  Micro- 
cerotermes crassus  Snyder,  Microcerotermes  paracelebensis  Ahmad,  and 
Microcerotermes  distans  (Haviland).  Herein,  I  report  one  additional  species, 
Microcerotermes  serrula  (Desneux)  (Fig.  1 ),  collected  from  the  southernmost 
peninsular  region  of  Thailand  in  Songkhla  Province  near  the  border  with  Ma- 
laysia. This  species  is  widespread  throughout  peninsular  Malaysia  (Tho  1992) 
in  lowland  dipterocarp  (Dipterocarpaceae)  forests  and  rubber  plantations, 
where  they  build  characteristic  aerial  nests  on  trees.  I  collected  specimens  of 
M.  serrula  from  an  aerial  nest  (Fig.  2)  in  a  rubber  plantation,  and  similar  nests 
were  observed  on  rubber  trees  throughout  Songkhla  Province.  The  effect  of  M. 
serrula  on  rubber  trees  and  rubber  production  is  unknown. 

Repository  specimens  are  located  in  the  National  Science  Museum,  Pathum 
Thani,  Thailand;  Royal  Forestry  Department,  Bangkok,  Thailand;  Department 
of  Pest  Management,  Faculty  of  Natural  Resources,  Prince  of  Songkhla  Uni- 
versity, Hat  Yai,  Thailand;  and  the  Enns  Entomology  Museum,  University  of 
Missouri-Columbia,  Columbia,  Missouri  U.S.A. 


1  Received  on  September  28,  2004.  Accepted  on  October  14,  2004. 

2  Department  of  Entomology,    1-87  Agriculture   Building,   University  of  Missouri  Columbia, 
Columbia,  Missouri  65211  U.S.A.   E-mail:  housemanr(a missouri.edu. 

Mailed  on  February  3.  2005 


238 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Microcerotermes  serrula  (Desneux) 

THAILAND:  Songkhla  province,  Sadao  district,  rubber  plantation  near  Ban  Phni  Tieo,  ~6  km 
north  of  Malaysian  border  (WGS  84),  N  06°34.500  E  100°24.053,  03  June  2003,  R.M.  Houseman, 
complete  aerial  nest  containing  workers,  nymphs,  and  soldiers. 


Fig.  1.  Soldier  of 

Microcerotermes  serrula 

(Desneux).  View  of  head  and 

pronotum  from  above. 


Fig.  2.  Carton  nest  of 
Microcerotermes  serrula 
(Desneux)  in  the  branches 
of  a  rubber  tree  Hevea 
brasiliensis  (Willd.). 


Vol.  115.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2004  239 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  thank  Dr.  Surakrai  Permkam,  Prince  of  Songkhla  University;  Dr.  Robert  W.  Sites,  Akekewat 
Vitheepradit,  and  Mike  Ferro,  University  of  Missouri-Columbia  for  technical  and  logistical  assis- 
tance. I  also  thank  Dr.  Robert  W.  Sites  and  Dr.  Bruce  A.  Barrett  for  critical  reviews  of  the  manuscript. 
Support  for  RMH  was  provided  in  part  from  a  USDA-ARS  Hatch  allocation  to  the  University  of 
Missouri-Columbia. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Ahmad,  M.   1965.  Termites  (Isoptera)  of  Thailand.  Bulletin  of  the  American  Museum  of  Natural 
History  131(1):  1-113. 

Harris,  W.  V.    1968.  Isoptera  from  Vietnam,  Cambodia,  and  Thailand.  Opuscula  Entomologica 
33:143-154. 

Holmgren,  N.   1913.  Termitenstudien.  4.  Versuch  einer  systematischen  Monographic  der  Termiten 
der  orientalischen  Region.  Kunglica  Svenska  Vetenskapsakademiens  Handlingar  50(2):  1-276. 

Morimoto,  K.   1973.  Termites  from  Thailand.  Bulletin  of  the  Government  Forest  Experiment  Sta- 
tion 257:  57-80. 

Snyder,  T.  E.   1949.  Catalog  of  the  termites  (Isoptera)  of  the  world.  Smithsonian  Miscellaneous 
Collections  112:  1-490. 

Tho,  Y.  P.   1992.  Termites  of  Peninsular  Malaysia.  Malaysian  Forest  Records  36:  1-224. 


240  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  OCTOBER  20-22,  2004 


Working  Together  to  Promote  Interaction  and 
Cooperation  in  Entomology" 


Joint  Meeting  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (AES)  and 
the  Entomological  Society  of  Pennsylvania  (ESP) 

Susan  King  (AES)  and  David  Rebuck  (ESP),  co-organizers 


http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/  http://www.entsocpa.org/ 

The  October  meeting  was  a  joint  conference  between  the  American  Ento- 
mological Society  and  the  Entomological  Society  of  Pennsylvania,  having  last 
met  together  in  1994.  This  conference,  stretching  over  three  days,  in  three 
locations  in  southeastern  Pennsylvania  and  northern  Delaware,  was  organized 
by  the  presidents  of  the  two  societies,  Susan  King  (AES)  and  David  Rebuck 
(ESP).  The  varied  meeting  consisted  of  a  mixture  of  invited  and  submitted 
talks  and  posters,  tours  of  facilities,  and  a  keynote  speaker  and  awards  ban- 
quet. There  were  14  talks  given  over  a  wide  range  of  entomological  subjects, 
including  the  keynote  presentation  given  by  Dr.  Bern  Sweeney,  Director  of  the 
Stroud  Water  Research  Center,  where  the  Thursday  sessions  were  held.  He 
spoke  on  "The  Freshwater  Crisis:  The  Global  Problem  with  Backyard 
Solutions."  Tours  were  given  of  the  Stroud  Water  Research  Center,  and  of  the 
Department  of  Entomology  and  Wildlife  Ecology  and  the  USDA  Beneficial 
Insects  Laboratory,  both  at  the  University  of  Delaware,  where  the  Wednesday 
meeting  was  held.  Friday's  meeting  was  held  at  French  Creek  State  Park, 
where  some  of  the  participants  from  outside  the  region  stayed.  The  meetings 
were  well  attended;  at  the  Thursday  meeting  over  60  participants  attended  the 
morning  talks. 

The  full  list  of  speakers  for  this  joint  meeting  can  be  viewed  at  http://www. 
acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/joint-meeting-flyer.pdf. 

The  speakers  for  upcoming  meetings  (November  2004  -  April  2005)  of 
AES  can  be  found  at  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/membership.html. 

Jon  Gelhaus,  Corresponding  Secretary  of 

The  American  Entomological  Society  (2004) 

E-mail:  gelhaus@acnatsci.org 

Mailed  on  February  3,  2005 


Agreement.  By  submitting  a  paper  for  publication,  authors  tacitly  agree  to  not  submit  in  parallel 
the  same  manuscript  to  another  journal.  For  published  papers,  authors  agree  to  accept  responsibility 
for  all  page,  illustration,  and  requested  reprint  charges.  Rejected  manuscripts  will  be  discarded,  ex- 
cept for  original  artwork  and  photographs,  which  will  be  returned  to  the  authors. 

Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews.  These  are  much  shorter  contributions,  typically  not  exceed- 
ing two  printed  pages.  The  main  difference  between  these  types  of  contributions  and  longer  papers  is 
that  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews  lack  an  abstract  and  most  of  the  main  headings,  except  for  the 
acknowledgments  and  the  literature  cited  sections. 

Reviewers.  When  submitting  papers,  all  authors  are  requested  to  provide  the  names  of  two  qual- 
ified individuals  who  have  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  before  it  is  submitted  to  Entomological 
News.  The  receipt  of  all  papers  will  be  acknowledged  and,  if  accepted,  they  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  possible. 

All  papers,  except  book  reviews,  are  forwarded  to  experts  for  final  review  before  acceptance.  In 
order  to  expedite  the  review  process,  authors  are  also  asked  to  suggest  the  name,  address,  email,  tele- 
phone and  fax  of  at  least  three  experts  in  the  subject  field  to  whom  the  manuscript  may  be  forward- 
ed for  additional  review.  Ideally,  the  review  process  should  be  completed  within  30  days.  The  editor 
reserves  his  prerogative  of  sending  the  manuscript  to  other  reviewers.  Authors  are  also  welcome  to 
list  the  names  of  reviewers  to  whom  the  article  should  not  be  sent,  with  a  brief  explanation. 

Upon  return  of  reviews,  authors  will  be  asked  to  modify  or  rewrite  their  texts  to  accommodate 
suggestions  of  the  reviewers  and  the  editor  as  well  as  to  conform  to  requirements  of  Entomological 
News.  If  authors  do  not  modify  their  texts,  they  should  specifically  address,  on  a  point  by  point  basis, 
why  they  are  not  doing  that. 

Page  Proofs.  The  printer  will  send  page  proofs  to  the  editor  and  the  business  manager.  Faith 
Kuehn.  Then,  the  proofs  will  be  sent  to  the  corresponding  author  as  .pdf  files,  together  with  the 
reprint  order  form  as  an  .rtf  file.  Authors  must  process  proofs  and  return  them  to  the  editor  and  to  the 
business  editor  by  air  mail  or  e-mail  (attachment).  Authors  who  anticipate  being  absent  are  urged  to 
provide  forwarding  addresses  or  to  provide  temporary  addresses  (with  dates).  Proofs  not  approved 
within  one  week  will  be  published  as  is.  The  editor  will  collect  the  page  proofs  and  send  them  to  the 
printer. 

Page  and  Reprint  Charges.  Authors  will  be  charged  by  two-page  increments.  Charges  for  pub- 
lication in  Entomological  News  are  US$25.00  per  published  page  (or  part)  for  members  and 
US$30.00  per  published  page  (or  part)  for  nonmembers.  Authors  will  be  charged  for  all  text  figures 
and  halftones  at  the  rate  of  US$30.00  each,  regardless  of  size.  There  are  no  discounts.  There  are  no 
page  charges  for  book  reviews.  Page  and  reprint  charges  will  be  billed  by  Faith  Kuehn,  to  whom 
communications  and  remittances  of  page  charges  and  reprints  should  be  sent.  FK  address  is:  3789 
Foulk  Road,  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania  19061  U.S.A.  E-mail:  fbkuehn@yahoo.com. 

Articles  longer  than  20  printed  pages  of  Entomological  News  may  be  published  in  two  or  more 
installments,  unless  the  author  is  willing  to  pay  the  entire  cost  of  a  sufficient  number  of  additional 
pages  in  any  one  issue  to  enable  such  an  article  to  appear  without  division. 

If  hard  copy  reprints  are  desired,  they  must  be  ordered  together  with  the  proofs.  Reprints  as  .pdf 
files  are  available  for  the  authors.  For  options  and  charges,  contact  the  business  manager. 

Entomological  News  is  printed  by  Dover  Litho  Printing  Company,  1211  North  DuPont  Highway, 
Dover,  Delaware  19901  U.S.A.  Telephone  (302)  678-121 1;  fax:  (302)  678-8091:  toll-free  telephone 
(800)  366-9132;  Web  Page:  www.doverlitho.com.  Dover  Litho  has  been  recognized  by  DENREC  and 
DELRAP  Green  Industries  as  "The  Most  Environmentally  Conscious  Printer  in  the  State  of  Dela- 
ware." 

Entomological  News  is  available  in  microform  from  ProQuest  Information  and  Learning.  Call 
toll-free  (800)  521-3042,  (800)  521-0600.  (734)  761-4700.  Mail  inquiry  to:  ProQuest  Information 
and  Learning.  300  North  Zeeb  Road,  Ann  Arbor.  Michigan  48 106-9866  U.S.A. 

Entomological  News  is  listed  in  the  Science  Citation  Index  Expanded. 


SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  LIBRARIES 


39088011192119 

THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY'S 
CALVERT  AWARDS  FOR  2003  AND  2004 

In  1987,  the  American  Entomological  Society  initiated  the  Calvert  Award  to  be 
presented  to  a  young  person  who  has  demonstrated  outstanding  accomplishments  in 
insect-related  study.  The  Award  is  named  in  honor  of  Dr.  Philip  P.  Calvert  who  joined 
the  Society  as  a  teenager,  later  became  its  president,  and  was  a  member  for  74  years. 
As  Professor  of  Biology  at  the  University  of  Pennsylvania  and  an  Associate  of  the 
Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia,  Dr.  Calvert  played  an  important  role 
in  stimulating  an  interest  in  insects  among  young  people. 

On  April  23,  2003,  the  seventeenth  Calvert  Award  was  presented  to  D.  J.  Haney, 
an  eighth  grade  student  at  William  Allen  Middle  School,  Moorestown,  New  Jersey. 
His  project  was  entitled,  "To  Bite  or  Not  to  Bite."  Mr.  Haney's  project  evolved  from 
a  concern  about  the  transmission  of  West  Nile  Virus  by  mosquitoes.  He  studied  the 
effectiveness  of  a  variety  of  natural  compounds  on  their  ability  to  repel  a  local  vari- 
ety of  mosquito. 

Daniel  Zinshteyn,  an  eighth  grade  student  from  Philadelphia  who  attends  Baldi 
Middle  School,  was  first  runner-up  in  2003  with  another  insect  repellent  project, 
"DEET:  Are  there  hidden  dangers?"  For  his  project,  Daniel  compared  the  repellent 
effectiveness  of  DEET  and  Black  Walnut  extracts  on  fruit  flies,  and  found  the  extract 
to  be  safer  and  more  effective.  The  second  runner-up  was  Courtney  Cope,  from 
Sellersville,  PA,  and  Penn  View  Christian  School,  for  her  project,  "Horned  Passalus 
Beetles  can  pull  their  Own  Weight,  Can  You?" 

On  April  28,  2004,  the  eighteenth  Calvert  Award  was  presented  to  Brady  Rollins 
of  Newark,  Delaware,  a  student  at  the  Towle  Institute,  Hockessin,  Delaware.  Her 
project  was  entitled,  "Terminating  Termites."  Ms.  Rollings  interest  in  termites  arose 
from  a  visit  to  the  Entomology  and  Applied  Ecology,  University  of  Delaware.  Her 
project  was  selected  from  among  about  20  insect-related  science  projects  presented  at 
the  annual  Delaware  Valley  Science  Fairs  held  April  7  at  the  Expo  Center  in  Fort 
Washington,  Pennsylvania. 

Sam  Spoor,  a  seventh  grade  student  at  Woodlyn  Christian  School  in  Woodlyn, 
Pennsylvania,  was  first  runner-up  with  another  insect  repellent  project,  "Battling 
Mosquitoes."  Sam's  project  arose  from  his  interest  in  reducing  the  number  of  mos- 
quitoes breeding  around  his  home.  Second  runner-up  was  Natalie  Piger  from  Bethle- 
hem, Pennsylvania,  and  St.  Anne's  School  for  her  project  on  rearing  Painted  Lady 
butterflies,  "Growing  to  set  free?" 

All  students  were  honored  at  the  Calvert  Award  ceremonies  at  American  Entomo- 
logical Society  meetings  held  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  in  Philadelphia. 

Harold  B.  White,  Dept.  of  Chemistry  and  Biochemistry,  University  of  Delaware 
Newark,  Delaware  19717-1303  U.S. A,  E-mail:  halwhite@udel.edu 


Mailed  on  February  3,  2005 


Vol.  115 


'VEMBER  &  DECEMBER  2004 


OLOGICAL  NEWS 


The  genus  Ramosulus  Young  in  Colombia  (Homoptera:  Cicadellidae,  Cicadellinae) 

Paul  Freytag   241 

Redescription  of  Microtomus  reuteri  Berg  (Heteroptera:  Reduviidae: 
Hammacerinae)  from  southern  South  America 

Maria  Cecilia  Melo  and  Maria  del  Carmen  Coscaron    249 

Taxonomic  and  biological  observations  on  Leistotrophus  versicolor  (Coleoptera: 
Staphylinidae)  from  Mexico  Juan  Marque-,  and  Julieta  Asiain    255 

New  species  of  the  genera  Stictophaula  Hebard  and  Mirollia  Stsil 
(Orthoptera:  Tettigoniidae:  Phaneropterinae)  from  China 

A.  V.  Gorochov  and  Le  Kang   263 

First  host  record  for  Pteromalus  cardui  (Hymenoptera:  Pteromalidae)  on 
Urophora  quadrifasciata  (Diptera:  Tephritidae)  in  spotted  knapweed 
(Centaurea  biebersteinii,  Asteraceae)  in  Michigan,  U.S.A. 

Jordan  M.  Marshall,  Roger  A.  Burks,  and  Andrew  J.  Storer   273 

Two  new  species  of  Rhopalopsole  (Plecoptera:  Leuctridae)  from  China 

Ding  Yang,  Weihai  Li,  and  Fang  Zhu    279 

Further  records  of  phlebotomid  sandflies  (Diptera:  Phlebotomidae)  from 
Campeche,  Mexico     E.  A.  Rebollar-Tellez,  R  C.  Manrique-Saide,  E.  Tun-Ku, 

A.  Che-Mendoza,  and  F.  A.  Dzul-Manzanilla    283 

BOOK  REVIEW: 

When  bugs  were  big,  plants  were  strange,  and  tetrapods  stalked  the  Earth: 
a  cartoon  prehistory  of  life  before  dinosaurs  by  Hannah  Bonner 

Suzanne  Mclntire    292 


AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY  BUSINESS: 

Statement  of  ownership,  management,  and  circulation     Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay    293 

Acknowledgments  to  reviewers  of  articles  published  in  Entomological  News 
(Volume  115),  to  reviewers  overlooked  in  Volume  114,  and  to  volunteers 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay  and  Sarah  E.  Pivo    294 

Index  to  Volume  115  (1-5)  2004 

Jessi  O \\eill,  Suzaiyfe^Mcfylni&qnJfcLtitge  A.  Santiago-Blay    298 


SOCIETY  MEETING: 

Society  Meeting  of  November  10,  20()2 


Ion  Gelhaus 

Back  Cover 


THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

MAILED  ON  MARCH  15,  2005 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS,  THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY,  AND 
NEW  GUIDELINES  FOR  AUTHORS  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 

Entomological  News  is  published  bimonthly  except  July-August  by  The  American  Entomological 
Society,  which  is  headquartered  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences.  1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway, 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1 195  United  States  of  America.  AES  can  be  reached,  as  follows:  telephone  (215) 
561-3978;  fax  (215)  299-1028;  e-mail,  aes@acnatsci.org  and  website:  http://www.  acnatsci.org/hosted/aes. 
Information  on  the  Calvert  Award  for  insect-related  study  by  a  young  person  in  the  Delaware  Valley  region 
sponsored  by  The  American  Entomological  Society  can  be  found  at:  http://www.udel.edu/chem/white/ 
Odonata/Cal  vertAwd.html 

Subscriptions  to  and  Back  Issues  of  Entomological  News.  Private  subscriptions  for  personal  use  of 
members  of  the  society  are  US  $15  per  year  prepaid.  Subscriptions  for  institutions,  such  as  libraries,  lab- 
oratories, etc.  and  nonmembers.  are  US  $30  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  in  the  USA  and  US  $34  per 
year  prepaid  for  those  located  outside  the  USA.  Back  issues  when  available  are  sold  by  complete  volume, 
for  US  $15  to  members,  and  US  $30  to  nonmembers.  Membership  /  subscription  application  and  additional 
information  is  available  at:  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/  subscription.html.  Please  send  inquiries  or 
send  completed  membership  form  to:  Office  Manager  at  the  address  above,  e-mail:  aes@say.acnatsci.org, 
or  call  (215)  561-3978. 

Previous  editors  of  Entomological  News:  1(1)  January  1890  and  1(2)  February  1890,  Eugene  Murray 
Aaron  (1852-1940);  1(3)  March  1890  to  21(10)  December  1910,  Henry  Skinner  (1861-1926);  22(1) 
January  1911  to  54(9)  November  1943,  Phillip  P.  Calvert  ( 1871-1961 );  54(10)  December  1943  to  57(10) 
December  1946,  Editorial  Staff  with  A.  Glenn  Richards  (1909-1993)  and  R.  G.  Schmieder  (1898-1967)  as 
co-editors;  58(1)  January  1947  to  79(7)  July  1968,  R.  G.  Schmieder;  79(8)  October  1968  to  83(10)  to 
December  1972,  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.  (1919-1999);  84(1)  January  1973  to  85(4)  April  1974,  R.  W.  Lake; 
85(5-6)  May  &  June  1974  to  1 13(3)  May  &  June  2003,  Howard  P.  Boyd;  F.  Christian  Thompson  and 
Michael  Pogue  1 13(4)  September  &  October  2002  to  1 13(5)  November  &  December  2002. 

New  Guidelines  for  authors  of  Entomological  News: 

Further  guidelines  can  be  found  on 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/instructions.htm 

Subject  Coverage:  Entomology,  sensu  lato.  Manuscripts  on  systematics,  ecology,  evolution,  mor- 
phology, physiology,  behavior,  biodiversity,  conservation,  paleobiology,  and  other  aspects  of  insect  and 
terrestrial  arthropod  life  as  well  as  nomenclature,  biographies  and  history  of  entomology,  among  others, 
are  appropriate  topics  for  papers  submitted  to  Entomological  News.  Papers  on  applied,  economic,  and  reg- 
ulatory entomology  or  on  toxicology  and  related  subjects  will  be  considered  only  if  they  also  make  a  major 
contribution  in  one  of  the  aforementioned  fields. 

Any  author  may  submit  papers.  Manuscripts  will  be  accepted  from  any  author,  although,  papers 
from  members  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  are  given  priority.  It  is  suggested  that  all  prospec- 
tive authors  join  the  AES. 

Send  manuscripts,  books  for  review,  and  editorial  correspondence  to  the  editor.  All  manuscripts, 
including  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews,  submitted  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  as  well  as 
all  associated  editorial  communications  must  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay  at  this  address: 
Department  of  Paleobiology.  MRC-121,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution, 
P.  O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  D.C.  20013-7012  U.S.A.  If  an  author  uses  a  mailing  service  that  does  not 
accept  addresses  with  a  P.  O.  Box,  please  use  this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  West  Loading  Dock.  Washington.  District 
of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  Other  means  of  contacting  the  Editor  are,  as  follows:  Phone:  (202)  633-1383, 
Fax:  (202)  786-2832,  e-mails:  blayj@si.edu,  or  blayj@hotmail.com,  or  via  the  webpage  at  http://www. 
geocities.com/entomologicalnews/contact.  htm.  Books  for  review  should  also  be  sent  to  the  editor  who 
will,  in  turn,  give  them  to  a  colleague  for  review. 

Postmaster:  If  undeliverable,  please  send  to 
The  American  Entomological  Society  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 

1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway  /  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 
PERIODICAL  POSTAGE  PAID  AT  DOVER,  DELAWARE  19901  U.S.A. 


Vol.  115.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 241 

THE  GENUS  RAMOSUL US  YOUNG  IN  COLOMBIA 
(HOMOPTERA:  CICADELLIDAE,  CICADELLINAE)1 

Paul  H.  F rev  tag2 

ABSTRACT:  The  genus  Ramosulus  Young  is  reviewed  for  Colombia.  Of  the  four  species  in  the 
genus,  two  species,  R.  cormgipennis  (Osborn)  and  R.  phaedrus  Young,  were  known  for  Colombia. 
Five  species  are  described  as  new,  R.  agostits,  R.  crassus,  R.  hamatus,  R.  lohatus.  and  R.  minus,  mak- 
ing the  total  number  of  species  nine  for  the  genus  and  seven  for  Colombia. 

KEY  WORDS:  Ramosulus.  Homoptera,  Cicadellidae,  Cicadellinae,  Colombia 

The  genus  Ramosulus  was  described  by  Young  (1977)  in  his  revision  of  the 
Cicadellini  of  the  New  World.  He  designated  Cicadella  cormgipennis  Osborn  as 
the  type  of  the  genus,  and  included  four  species.  Two  of  the  species  were  known 
from  Colombia,  R.  phaedrus  Young  and  R.  cormgipennis  (Osborn)  [Young 
(1977),  Freytag  and  Sharkey  (2002)].  This  paper  is  an  update  of  our  knowledge 
of  the  genus  for  Colombia,  and  includes  the  description  of  five  new  species. 

All  types  of  the  new  species  are  deposited  in  the  Institute  von  Humboldt,  Villa 
de  Leyva,  Colombia.  Most  material  came  from  National  Parks  and  Reserves.  All 
species  of  Ramosulus  are  small,  usually  4  to  5.5  mm,  and  mostly  black  with 
orange  and  sometimes  yellow  markings.  This  genus  is  known  from  the  northern 
part  of  Brazil  and  from  Colombia  to  Bolivia. 

Key  to  the  species  of  Ramosulus  in  Colombia  (males) 

1.  Clypellus  black;  pronotum  with  an  interrupted  transverse  band  of  orange 

phaedrus  Young 

1'.  Clypellus  with  lower  portion  pale  yellowish  white;  pronotum  with  a  complete 
transverse  band  of  orange 2 

2.  Pronotal  transverse  orange  band  nearly  straight  across,  and  either  wide  or  nar- 
row; scutellum  variable  (Figs.  1-4)  3 

2'.  Pronotal  transverse  orange  band  wide  on  lateral  margins  then  narrow  and  bis- 
inuous;  scutellum  entirely  black  (Figs.  5-6)  6 


1  Received  on  September  2,  2004.  Accepted  on  October  2 1 .  2004. 

:  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Kentucky,  Lexington,  Kentucky  40546-0091   U.S.A. 
E-mail:  pfreytag(o)ix. netcom.com. 

ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  115(5):  240.  November  &  December  2004 
Mailed  on  March  15.  2005 


242  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


3.  Orange  band  across  crown  not  reaching  hind  margin  of  head  near  eyes;  prono- 

tal  transverse  orange  band  narrow  and  close  to  posterior  margin  (Fig.  1 ) 

lobatus  n.  sp. 

3'.  Orange  band  across  crown  reaching  hind  margin  of  head  near  eyes;  pronotal 
transverse  orange  band  wide  (Figs.  2-4)  4 

4.  Pygofer  with  a  tuft  of  short  setae  at  apex  (Fig.  14);  aedeagus  with  a  long  shaft 
(Fig.  11)  corrugipennis  (Osborn) 

4'.  Pygofer  with  a  spine-like  process  at  apex  (Figs.  10,  18,  and  22)  5 


5.  Scutellum  with  a  pair  of  orange  spots  (Fig.  3);  aedeagus  with  shaft  straight, 

with  apical  processes  long,  and  each  nearly  as  long  as  the  shaft  (Fig.  16) 

crassus  n.  sp. 

5'.  Scutellum  entirely  black  (Fig.  4);  aedeagus  s-shaped,  with  apical  processes 
long,  and  each  nearly  two-thirds  length  of  shaft  (Fig.  20)  agostus  n.  sp. 

6.  Orange  band  on  crown  not  reaching  hind  margin  of  head  near  eyes  (Fig.  5); 
pygofer  with  a  stout  spine  off  ventral  caudal  margin  (Fig.  23) nanus  n.  sp. 

6'.  Orange  band  on  crown  reaching  hind  margin  of  head  near  eyes  (Fig.  6); 
pygofer  with  a  small  hook-like  process  off  caudal  margin  (Fig.  26)  ..hamatus 
n.  sp. 


Ramosulus  phaedrus  Young 

Ramosulus  phaedrus  Young  1977,  p.  441. 

Length  of  males  5-5.1  mm,  females  5.3-5.4  mm.  Head  mostly  black  with  a  median  stripe  from 
between  ocelli  extending  onto  face,  and  area  from  antenna!  ledges  along  eyes  to  posterior  margin, 
orange.  Pronotum  black  with  a  transverse  band  across  median,  interrupted  medially,  orange.  Scutel- 
lum black  with  pair  of  small  orange  spots  on  posterior  half.  Wings  much  as  in  corrugipennis.  Legs 
mostly  brown. 

Male  genitalia:  Young  (1977)  illustrated  the  male  genitalia  of  this  species.  The  types  of  this 
species  were  not  seen,  but  this  species  was  described  from  Cundinamarca,  Colombia,  on  the  basis  of 
two  males  and  three  females.  No  other  specimens  have  been  seen  of  this  species. 


Ramosulus  lobatus  n.  sp. 

(Figs.  1  and  7-10) 

Length  of  males  4.2-4.6  mm.,  females  4.3-4.6  mm.  Overall  color  pattern  similar  to 
nis.  However,  head,  pronotum,  scutellum  (Fig.  1)  with  orange  band  not  reaching  hind  margin  of 
crown;  scutellum  with  triangular  spots,  yellow. 


Vol.  115,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 


243 


LOBATUS      CORRUGIPENNIS     CRASSUS 


0.5mm 


AGOSTUS 


NANUS 


HAMATUS 


Figures  1-6.  Dorsal  view  of  head,  pronotum  and  scutellum  of  the  species  of  Ramosulus 
covered  in  this  paper.  All  drawn  to  same  scale.  Fig.  1,  Ramosulus  lobatus  n.  sp.  Fig.  2,  R. 
cormgipennis  (Osborn).  Fig.  3,  R.  cnissus  n.  sp.  Fig.  4,  R.  agostiis  n.  sp.  Fig.  5,  R.  namis 
n.  sp.  Fig.  6,  R.  hamatus  n.  sp. 


Male  nenitalia:  Pygofer  (Fig.  7)  triangular  with  lobe  on  ventral  margin  near  base,  with  setal-like 
process  (Fig.  10)  at  apex.  Plate  (Fig.  9)  narrowing  to  pointed  apex,  about  hall"  length  of  pygofer. 
Aedeagus  (Fig.  8)  long,  narrow,  u-shaped  near  base  in  lateral  view  with  two  long  processes  at  apex, 
one  extending  dorsad  beyond  apex,  other  extending  basad  close  to  shaft.  Paraphysis  (Fig.8)  u-shaped. 
around  base  of  aedeagus. 

Female  ^uiiialia:  Seventh  sternum  \\ith  posterior  margin  e\enly  eomexly  rounded,  similar  to 
cormgipennis. 

Type  Material:  llololype  male:  Colombia:  Putumayo,  PNN  La  Paya.  Salao  Grande,  0°0!'S  74" 
56' W,  330  m.,  22-VII1-2001,  Red,  D  Campos,  M  2085.  Paratypes:  Four  males,  same  data  as  holotype; 
one  male,  same  data  as  holotype,  except  M  2087. 


244 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


10 


LOBATUS 


8 


0.5mm 


CORRUGIPENNIS 


12 


13 


14 


15 
CRASSUS 


/T" 


16 


17 


18 


Figures  7-10.  Ramosulus  lobatus  n.  sp.  Fig.  7,  male  genital  capsule,  lateral  view.  Fig.  8, 
aedeagus  and  paraphysis,  lateral  view.  Fig.  9,  plate,  ventral  view.  Fig.  10,  apex  of  pygofer, 
ventral  view.  Figures  11-14.  Ramosulus  cornigipennis  (Osborn).  Fig.  11,  male  genital 
capsule,  lateral  view.  Fig.  12,  aedeagus  and  paraphysis,  lateral  view.  Fig.  13,  plate,  ven- 
tral view.  Fig.  14,  apex  of  pygoter,  ventral  view.  Figures  15-18.  Ramosulus  crassus  n.  sp. 
Fig.  15,  male  genital  capsule,  lateral  view.  Fig.  16,  aedeagus  and  paraphysis,  lateral  view. 
Fig.  17,  plate,  ventral  view.  Fig.  1 8,  apex  of  pygoter,  ventral  view.  All  drawn  to  same  scale. 


_  Vol.  115.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004  _  245 

Other  specimens  examined:  one  male,  Colombia,  Caqueta,  PNN  Chiribiquctc,  Rio  Cunare, 
0°32'N  72"37'W,  300  m..  Malaise,  15-19-XI-2000,  E.  Gonzalez  y  M  Ospina;  one  male  and  one 
female,  Colombia:  Meta,  PNN  Tinigua,  Vda.  Bajo  Raudal,  2°16'N,  73°48'W,  460  m..  Malaise,  29-  VI- 
20-VII-2002,  C.  Sanchez,  M  2332;  one  female,  Colombia,  Meta,  PNN  Tinigua,  Cano  Nevera,  2°!!^ 
73"48'W,  390  m..  Malaise,  23-I-7-II-2002,  C.  Sanchez,  M  2330;  one  female,  same  data  as  last,  except 
20-23-XII-2001,  M  2621;  one  female,  Colombia:  Meta,  PNN  Sierra  de  La  Macarena,  Cabana 
Cerrillo,  3"21'N  73°56'W,  460  m.,  Malaise,  21XII-2002-4I-2003,  A.  Herrera  y  W.  Villalba,  M  2983. 
All  specimens  deposited  in  the  Institute  von  Humboldt. 


Ramosiilus  corrugipennis  (Osborn) 

(Figs.  2  and  11-14) 


Cicadella  corrugipennis  Osborn  1926,  p.  204. 
Ramosiilus  corrugipennis  Young  1977,  p.  439. 

Length  of  males  4.2-4.6  mm,  females  4.5-5  mm.  Color  mostly  black  with  orange  pattern.  Head, 
pronotum,  scutellum  (Fig.  2).  Head  with  crown  black  with  wide  transverse  orange  band  anterior  to 
ocelli,  extending  onto  antennal  shelf  and  back  to  posterior  margin  near  eyes.  Face  with  upper  two- 
thirds  black,  lower  third  yellowish  white.  Pronotum  black,  with  wide  transverse  orange  band  across 
posterior  half,  covering  nearly  half  of  dorsal  surface.  Scutellum  black,  with  triangular  orange  spots 
on  posterior  half.  Front  wings  black,  with  three  wide  longitudinal  orange  bands,  one  along  commis- 
sural  edge  of  clavus,  one  below  claval  suture  from  base  to  apical  cells,  one  along  entire  costal  mar- 
gin; claval  suture  and  commissure  marked  with  thin  line  of  yellow,  apical  cells  smokey.  Legs  most- 
ly yellow  with  orange  tibiae. 

Male  genitalia:  Pygofer  (Fig.  1  1  )  elongate  with  rounded  apex,  apex  with  a  cluster  of  short  setae 
(Fig.  14).  Plate  (Fig.  13)  narrowing  to  long  pointed  apex,  about  two-thirds  length  of  pygofer. 
Aedeagus  (Fig.  12)  with  long  shaft,  curving  ventrally  near  apex,  with  two  stout  process  at  apex,  one 
extending  dorsally,  one  extending  ventrally.  Paraphysis  (Fig.  12)  u-shaped,  around  base  of  aedeagus. 

Female  genitalia:  Seventh  sternum  with  posterior  margin  evenly  convexly  rounded. 

Young  (1977)  illustrated  both  the  male  and  female  characters  of  this  species. 
This  species  has  the  widest  range  of  any  of  the  species  of  the  genus  and  is  known 
from  Bolivia,  Brazil,  Colombia,  Ecuador,  and  Peru.  It  is  the  most  commonly  col- 
lected species  in  Colombia  and  has  been  collected  in  Amazonas,  Meta,  Putumayo 
and  Vaupes.  Adults  appear  to  be  collected  year  round  in  these  areas. 

Ramosiilus  crassus  n.  sp. 

(Figs.  3  and  15-18) 

Length  of  male  4.  1  mm.  female  unknown.  Overall  color  pattern  similar  to  corntgipennis.  except 
legs  mostly  orange.  Head,  pronotum.  scutellum  (Fig.  3),  as  in  R.  corrugipennis,  except  transverse 
orange  band  across  pronotum  covering  two-thirds  of  dorsal  surface. 

Malcgcnitalia:  Pygofer  (Fig.  15)  short,  narrowing  to  truncate  apex,  with  large  spine-like  process 
at  apex  (Fig.  18).  Plate  (Fig.  17)  short,  narrowing  to  a  pointed  apex,  less  than  half  length  of  pygofer. 
Aedeagus  (Fig.  16)  short,  stout  at  base,  narrowing  to  ventrally  bent  apex,  with  two  lung  processes  at 
apex,  one  extending  dorsally,  other  ventrally.  Paraphysis  (Fig.  16)  u-shaped,  around  base  of  aedea- 
gus. 

Type  Material:  Holotype  male:  Colombia:  Meta,  PNN  Tinigua,  Vda.  Bajo  Raudal,  2"16'N  73° 
48'W,  460  m..  Malaise,  29-V1-20  VII-2002,  C.  Sanchez,M  2332. 


246 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


AGOSTUS 


21 


22 


24 


0.5mm 


25 


26 
HAMATUS 


27 


28 


Figures  19-22.  Ramosulus  agostus  n.  sp.  Fig.  19,  male  genital  capsule,  lateral  view.  Fig. 
20,  aedeagus  and  paraphysis,  lateral  view.  Fig.  21,  plate,  ventral  view.  Fig.  22,  apex  of 
pygofer,  ventral  view.  Figures  23-25.  Ramosulus  nanus  n.  sp.  Fig.  23,  male  genital  cap- 
sule, lateral  view.  Fig.  24,  aedeagus  and  paraphysis,  lateral  view.  Fig.  25,  plate,  ventral 
view.  Figures  26-28.  Ramosulus  hamatus  n.  sp.  Fig.  26,  male  genital  capsule,  lateral  view. 
Fig.  27,  aedeagus  and  paraphysis,  lateral  view.  Fig.  28,  plate,  ventral  view.  All  drawn  to 
same  scale. 


Vol.  115,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004  247 


Ramosulus  agostus  n.  sp. 

(Figs.  4  and  19-22) 


Length  of  male  5.5  mm,  female  5.5  mm.  Head,  pronotum,  scutellum  (Fig.  4).  Head  with  black  rec- 
tangular spot  on  anterior  median  margin  extending  onto  face,  longer  than  wide,  remainder  efface  yel- 
lowish white.  Pronotum  with  transverse  orange  band  wide  and  located  medially.  Scutellum  black. 
Front  wings  similar  to  corrugipennis. 

Male  genitalia:  Pygofer  (Fig.19)  triangular  with  a  long  spine  at  apex  (Fig.  22).  Plate  (Fig.  21) 
narrowing  near  middle  to  a  long  pointed  apex,  about  half  length  of  pygofer.  Aedeagus  (Fig.  20)  with 
shaft  s-shaped  in  lateral  view,  with  two  long  processes  at  apex,  one  extending  dorsad,  other  ventrad. 
Paraphysis  (Fig.  20)  u-shaped  and  near  base  of  aedeagus. 

Female  genitalia:  Seventh  sternum  with  posterior  margin  evenly  convexly  rounded,  embrowned 
on  median  third. 

Type  Material:  Holotype  male:  Colombia:  Choco,  PNN  Utria,  Boroboro,  6°01'N  77°20'W,  10 
m.,  Malaise,  5-19-V1I-2000,  J.  Perez,  M  335.Paratype  female:  Same  data  as  holotype,  except  20  m., 
I9-27-VII-2000,  M334. 

This  is  the  largest  species  in  the  genus  at  this  time.  Other  specimens  seen  are 
two  males  from  Colombia;  Teresita,  March  26,  1967,  sweeping;  and  one  male 
same  data  except  April  20,  1967,  in  the  University  of  Kentucky  collection. 

Ramosulus  nanus  n.  sp. 

(Figs.  5  and  23-25) 

Length  of  males  4.1-4.2  mm.,  female  unknown.  Head,  pronotum,  scutellum  (Fig.  5).  Head  black 
with  transverse  band  of  orange  anterior  to  ocelli,  extending  onto  antennal  ledges  and  along  eyes  but 
not  reaching  posterion  margin;  face  with  median  black  spot  on  anterior  margin,  remainder  yellowish 
white.  Pronotum  black  with  transverse  orange  band  on  posterior  half  bisinous,  wider  on  lateral  mar- 
gins. Scutellum  black  Front  wings  similar  to  corrugipennis.  except  with  additional  narrow  yellow 
band,  or  bands,  between  claval  suture  and  larger  band  of  orange  on  clavus. 

Male  genitalia:  Pygofer  (Fig.  23)  small,  rounded  with  prominent  apical  ventral  spine.  Plate  (Fig. 
25)  short,  robust,  narrowing  near  middle  to  rounded  apex,  somewhat  paddle  shaped  in  lateral  view 
(Fig.  23),  extending  slightly  beyond  pygofer.  Aedeagus  (Fig.  24)  short,  stout,  with  two  processes  at 
apex,  one  short  and  curving  ventrally,  other  longer  extending  basally.  Paraphysis  (Fig.  24)  u-shaped 
near  base  of  aedeagus. 

Type  Material:  Holotype  male:  Colombia:  Vaupes,  RN  Mosiro-Itaiura  (Capani),  Centre  Ambien- 
tal.  f°04'S  69°31'W,  60  m..  Red,  20-I-1-II-2003,  M.  Sharkey  &  D.  Arias,  M  3387.  Paratypes:  three 
males,  same  data  as  holotype,  except  Malaise,  M  3386. 

Ramosulus  hamatus  n.  sp. 

(Figs.  6  and  26-28) 

Length  of  males  4-4.4  mm.,  females  4.3-4.6  mm.  Overall  color  pattern  similar  to  R.  minus,  except 
the  orange  band  on  crown  extends  to  posterior  margin.  Head,  pronotum,  scutellum  (Fig.  6). 

Male  genitalia:  Pygofer  (Fig.  26)  short,  rounded  with  small  hook-like  process  at  caudal  apex. 
Plate  as  in  nanus  (Fig.  28).  Aedeagus  (Fig.  27)  short,  somewhat  stout,  with  a  short  process  at  apex 
curving  ventrad.  Paraphysis  (Fig.  27)  u-shaped,  around  basal  part  of  aedeagus. 

Female  genitalia:  Seventh  sternum  with  posterior  margin  evenly,  but  slightly,  concavely  round- 
ed either  side  of  median,  also  embrowned  either  side  of  median  giving  median  triangular  appearance. 

Type  Material:  Holotype  male:  Colombia:  Ama/onas,  PNN  Amacayacu,  Mocagua,  3°23'S, 
70°06'W,  150  m..  Malaise,  19-3  1-VI1-2000.  A.  Parente,  M  676.  Paratypes:  Two  males,  same  data  as 
holotype. 


248  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Other  specimens  examined:  51  males  and  46  females,  mostly  same  data  as  holotype,  but  col- 
lected various  times  since  the  time  the  types  were  collected.  Specimens  deposited  in  the  Institute  von 
Humboldt  and  the  University  of  Kentucky  collection. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

Thanks  are  extended  to  Michael  J.  Sharkey  whose  National  Science  Foundation  Grant  no.  DEB 
0205982  made  it  possible  to  study  the  specimens  used  for  this  study. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Freytag,  P.  H.  and  M.  J.  Sharkey.  2002.  A  Preliminary  list  of  the  leafhoppers  (Homoptera:  Cica- 
dellidae)  of  Colombia.  Biota  Colombiana  3(2):  235-283. 

Osborn,  H.  1926.  V.  Neotropical  Homoptera  of  the  Carnegie  Museum.  Part  5.  Report  upon  the  Col- 
lections in  the  Subfamily  Cicadellinae,  with  descriptions  of  new  species.  Annals  of  the  Carnegie 
Museum  XVI(2):  155-249. 

Young,  D.  A.  1977.  Taxonomic  study  of  the  Cicadellinae  (Homoptera:  Cicadellidae).  Part  2.  New 
World  Cicadellini  and  the  genus  Cicadella.  North  Carolina  Agricultural  Experiment  Station 
Bulletin  239.  1135pp. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 249 

REDESCRIPTION  OF  MICROTOMVS  REUTERI  BERG 

(HETEROPTERA:  REDUVIIDAE:  HAMMACERINAE) 

FROM  SOUTHERN  SOUTH  AMERICA1 

Maria  Cecilia  Melo2  and  Maria  del  Carmen  Coscaron' 

ABSTRACT:  Micmtomus  reuteri  (Berg)  is  redescribed.  Photographs  and  drawings  of  the  male  and 
female  genitalia  are  given. 

KEY  WORDS:  Micmtomus  reuteri,  Hammacerinae,  Reduviidae,  Heteroptera,  redescription,  Argen- 
tina, Bolivia,  Brazil 

The  American  subfamily  Hammacerinae  (Reduviidae)  is  characterized  by 
having  the  second  antennal  segment  annulated  and  the  scutellum  with  two  apical 
prongs.  According  to  Costa  Lima  (1835)  these  antennal  pseudosegments  can 
vary  in  number  from  8  to  40,  Maldonado  Capriles  and  Santiago-Blay  (1991)  con- 
sidered from  the  variation  to  range  from  23  to  28,  and  Schuh  and  Slater  (1995) 
from  4  to  36.  Meanwhile  Coscaron  et  al.  (2003)  described  the  maximum  number 
in  M.  tibia/is  (Stichel)  with  35  pseudosegments. 

This  subfamily  is  comprised  of  two  genera,  Homalocoris  Perty  1833  and 
Micmtomus  Illiger  1807  (Maldonado  Capriles  1990).  Microtomm  includes  12 
species,  some  of  them  were  studied  in  previous  contributions  as  M.  cinctipes 
(Stal),  M.  conspicillaris  (Drury),  M.  gayi  (Spinola),  M.  luctuosus  (Stal),  M. 
lunifer  (Berg),  M.  pessoai  Lent  and  Suarez,  M.  pwcis  (Drury),  and  M.  tibia  I  is 
Stichel  (Coscaron  and  Giacchi  1985,  1987;  Giacchi  and  Coscaron  1986,  1989; 
Coscaron  et  al.  2003),  where  adults,  immature  stages  and  eggs  were  redescribed. 

Berg  in  his  original  description  characterized  M.  reuteri  by  the  presence  of:  a 
transverse  black  stripe  crossing  the  middle  of  chorion,  the  apex  of  the  clavus,  and 
the  stripes  situated  on  the  middle  of  anterior  and  median  femora  and  on  the  ante- 
rior middle  of  posterior  femora,  which  are  testaceous  on  the  forelegs  and  red  on 
the  latter  (". . .  la  faja  transversal  negra  que  pasa  por  el  medio  del  corion  y  el  apice 
del  clavo,  y  por  la  cinta  de  los  femures,  situada  en  el  medio  de  los  anteriores  e 
intermedio,  y  algo  adelante  del  medio  en  los  femures  posteriores,  la  cual  en  los 
primeros  es  de  color  testaceo  y  en  los  ultimos  de  un  rojo  vivo").  Based  on  the 
examination  of  the  holotype,  deposited  in  the  Museo  de  La  Plata  (Universidad 
Nacional  de  La  Plata,  Argentina)  and  on  additional  conspecifics,  we  redescribe 
Micmtomus  reuteri  (Berg)  and  important  characters  omitted  in  the  original  des- 
cription. 


1  Received  on  July  14,  2004.  Accepted  on  November  4,  2004. 

:  DivisicSn  Hntomologia.  Museo  de  Ciencias  Naturales  de  La  Plata.  Universidad  Nacional  de  La  Plata, 
Paseo  del  Bosque  s/n".  1900,  La  Plata.  Buenos  Aires,  Argentina.  E-mails:  cecimelo(«  netverk.com. ar 
and  coscaronto  netverk.com.ar,  respectively. 

Mailed  on  March  15,  2005 


250 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


METHODS 

We  worked  with  specimens  from  the  collections  of  the  American  Museum  of 
Natural  History  (AMNH),  New  York,  U.S. A;  Institute  Oswaldo  Cruz,  Rio  de 
Janeiro,  Brazil  (IOC);  Fundacion  Miguel  Lillo,  Tucuman,  Argentina  (FML); 
Museo  Argentine  de  Ciencias  Naturales  (MACN),  Buenos  Aires,  Argentina,  and 
Museo  de  Ciencias  Naturales  de  La  Plata  (MLP),  La  Plata,  Argentina. 
Morphological  characters  were  observed  with  a  Wild-M5  stereomicroscope. 
Illustrations  were  done  with  a  drawing  tube  attachment.  The  measurements  of 
body  parts  are  given  in  millimeters. 


Microtomus  reuteri  (Berg,  1879) 

Figs.  1-8 

Hammatocerus  cinctipes:  Berg,  1879  (nee  Stal),  Anal.  Soc.  Cient.  Arg.,  7:  159. 

Hammatocerus  Reuteri  Berg,   1879,  Hem.  Arg.,  9:  23;  Lethierry  and  Severin,   1896,  Cat.  Gen. 

Hemipt.,  3:  143;  Berg,  1884,  Anal.  Soc.  Cient.  Argent.,  17:  191. 
Microtomus  reuteri  Stichel,  1926,  Deut.  Ent.  Zeits.,  6:  180,  184. 
Microtomus  fasciatus  and/  nigra  Stichel,  1926,  Deut.  Ent.  Zeits.,  6:  181,  186,  187. 
Microtomus  reuteri  Costa  Lima,  1935,  Anais  Acad.  Bras.  Cien.,  7:  320;  Wygodzinsky,  1949,  Inst. 

Med.  Reg.  Tucuman,  Monografia   1:  52;  Maldonado  Capriles,   1990,  Carib.  J.  Sci.,  p  158; 

Coscaron,  1998,  Rev.  Mus.  La  Plata,  31:6. 


Fig.  1.  Microtomus 
reuteri  Berg,  general 
aspect,  dorsal. 


Vol.  115.  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 251 

Redescription.  Body  compressed  dorsoventrally,  color  dark  brown  (fig.  1 ). 
Total  length  16.20-19.62  (mean  =;  17.37).  Head  cylindrical  and  elongate,  with 
abundant  granulations  and  setae  (fig.  2).  Length  2.41-2.79  (mean  =  2.62),  width 
2.41-2.85  (mean  =  2.64).  Anteocular  region  much  longer  than  postocular  one. 
Eyes  very  prominent  and  lateral,  with  black  and  golden  spots,  reduced  posterior- 
ly. Behind  them,  close  to  the  neck,  light  brown  areas.  Width  of  eyes  0.63-0.76 
(mean  =  0.70).  Length  of  interocular  space  1 .0 1  - 1 .20  (mean  =  1.15).  Ocelli  pres- 
ent between  eyes,  color  light  brown.  Before  them,  two  triangular  light  brown 
areas  are  present  without  granulations  or  setae.  Rostrum  curved,  brown,  except 
distal  portion  of  each  segment  light  brown  or  reddish  brown,  with  abundant  setae 
ventrally.  In  some  specimens,  first  segment  with  external  longitudinal  light 
brown  stripe.  Length  20.9-3.04  (mean  ==  2.70).  Ratio  of  length  of  segments 
ca.  1:0. 75:0. 58.  Antenna  inserted  at  middle  of  anteocular  region.  Antenna  color 
dark  brown,  setose.  Length  7.79.  Ratio  of  length  of  segments  ca.  1:9.09:3.43: 
2.73.  Second  segment  with  18-20  pseudosegments.  Neck  dark  brown,  without 
granulations  or  setae. 

Thorax  dark  brown,  with  granulations  and  setae.  Length  3.80-4.56  (mean  = 
4.34),  width  4.43-  5.32  (mean  =  4.89).  Humeral  angles  of  pronotum  with  short 
protuberances.  Scutellum  with  granulations  and  setae.  Legs  with  abundant  setae 
and  granulations,  more  conspicuous  on  fore  and  middle  legs,  color  dark  brown, 
except  a  pale  laterally  interrupted  band  on  middle  of  femora.  Femora  I  and  II 
enlarged  in  middle  part.  Tibia  brown  or  reddish  brown,  very  setose.  Spongy  fos- 
sula  present  on  tibia  I  and  II.  Tarsi  brown,  with  setae.  Hemelytra  dark  brown, 
except  yellowish-white  spots  on  chorion  and  clavus  (fig.  1 ).  In  males,  hemelytra 
reach  posterior  border  of  abdomen,  being  shorter  in  females.  Length  of  hemely- 
tra 10.13-12.53  (mean  =  11.22).  Abdomen  dark  brown,  setose,  without  granula- 
tions. Males  with  setose  area  in  central  part  of  segments  3  and  4.  Length  8.36- 
9.87  (mean  =  8.94),  width  5.44-6.96  (mean  =  6.19).  Connexivum  dark  brown 
with  a  colored  area  on  every  segment  (fig.  1 ).  Color  varies  from  yellowish  white 
to  reddish  light  brown;  with  setae  but  without  granulations. 

Male:  Figs.  3-4.  Pygophore  (fig.  3)  subrounded  with  sparse  long  setae;  para- 
meres  (fig.  4)  curved,  acute  distally,  with  abundant  long  setae  medially  in  the 
external  surface; 

Female:  Figs.  5-6.  Gonocoxite  VIII  (fig.  5)  with  abundant  short  and  sparse 
long  setae;  gonapophysis  VIII  (fig.  5)  with  six  setae  distally;  gonocoxite  IX  (fig. 
6)  with  long  setae. 

Distribution.  Argentina,  Bolivia,  Brazil,  and  Uruguay. 


252 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


1  mm 


0.5mm 


2  mm 


/^\Y:\\\ 

/>/  \\vX^ 


2  mm 


2  mm 


Figs.  2-8.  Microtomus  renter/  Berg.  2.  head,  lateral  view;  3-4.  male  genitalia: 
3.  pygophore,  lateral  view,  4.  paramere;  5-6.  female  genitalia:  5.  gonocoxite  and  gonapo- 
physis  VIII;  6.  gonocoxite  IX.  7-8.  Hcmelytra:  7.  female  from  Cordoba,  Argentina; 
8.  male  from  Misiones,  Argentina. 


Vol.  1 1 5,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004  253 


Material  Examined:  Holotype  male,  ARGENTINA:  Misiones,  n°  1547  (MLP).  ARGENTINA: 
Buenos  Aires:  If,  Escobar,  V-1949,  Wygodzinsky  coll.,  IMR  802  (FML);  2m  If,  Campana,  VIII- 
1956,  (AMNH);  If,  14-1-1909,  n°  5653,  Ronderos  det.  (MACN);  If,  Delta,  INTA,  9-15-1-1978, 
Bachmann  coll.  (MACN).  Cordoba:  If,  W.M.  Davis  coll.,  M.  fasciatus  H.G.  Barber  det  (AMNH); 
1m,  Cordoba,  Rio  Seco,  11-1955,  Monros  coll.  (FML);  If,  Dept.  Calamuchita,  El  Sauce,  1-1941,  M.J. 
Viana  coll.  (MACN);  1m,  Rio  Ceballos,  1-1951,  B.  Juarez  Heredia  coll.  (FML).  Corrientes:  If,  XII- 
1919,  Wygodzinsky  det.  (AMNH);  1m,  Ita  Ibate,  12-1-1949,  Lieberm.  Dangelo  coll..  Wygodzinsky 
det.  Misiones:  1m  If,  P.N.  Iguazii,  XII-1979,  Carpintero  coll.,  Carpintero  det.  (MACN);  Salta:  1m, 
Tartagal,  10-1-1957,  Willink  coll.,  Wygodzinsky  det.(FML).  Sunta  Fe:  If,  Florencia,  27-VI-1932,  en 
poste  de  corral  de  ovejas  y  cabras,  n°  25891,  Mision  de  Estudios  de  Patologia  Regional,  Jujuy  (IOC); 
If,  Lanteri,  7-1-1946  (AMNH).  BOLIVIA:  If,  Prov.  Sara,  Steinbach,  H.G.  Barber  det.  (AMNH). 
BRAZIL:  Goias:  2f,  XII-  1933,  Leopoldo  Bulhoes,  R.  Spitz  coll.,  em  pau  podre,  n°  2198,  Costa 
Lima  det.  (IOC).  Sao  Paulo:  If,  Sao  Paulo,  Anhemby,  R.  Tiete,  I- 10,  n°  4028,  Costa  Lima  det.  (IOC); 
1m,  Otto  One  Ler?,  4-II-1922,  n°  4029  (MLP);  If  1m,  Franca,  O.  Dreher  leg.;  If,  Tiememgasap? 
Costa  Lima  det.  No  certainty  in  procedence:  If,  n°  2199,  Costa  Lima  det.  (IOC);  If,  Ronderos  det. 
(MACN);  If,  n°  526  (FML)." 


DISCUSSION 

Microtomus  reuteri  is  easy  to  distinguish  by  the  coloration  pattern  of  hemely- 
tra,  very  different  to  other  species  where  the  pale  portion  is  more  expanded  as  in 
M.  luctuosus,  M.  cinctipes,  M.  purcis,  M.  conspicillaris  or  it  is  very  reduced  as 
in  M.  lunifer,  M.  pintoi  and  M.  tibialis.  It  is  closely  related  to  M.  gayi  and  M.  pes- 
soai,  they  have  5-7  setae  on  gonapophysis  VIII  in  females.  We  agree  with  Berg's 
comments  in  that  the  diagnostic  character  is  the  coloration  pattern  of  hemelytra; 
although  we  observed  two  exceptions:  in  one  specimen  from  El  Sauce,  Dept. 
Calamuchita  (Cordoba,  Argentina)  where  the  basal  part  of  hemelytra  is  dark 
brown  (fig.  7),  and  one  specimen  from  Iguazii  (Misiones,  Argentina)  where  the 
pale  areas  are  connected  meddialy  (fig.  8).  In  this  species  there  is  no  variation  in 
the  pattern  of  the  connexivum  as  it  is  in  M.  conspicillaris,  M.  cinctipes  and 
M.  tibialis. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  want  to  acknowledge  the  anonymous  reviewers  that  improved  this  manuscript.  This  work  was 
supported  by  the  Consejo  Nacional  de  Investigaciones  Cientificas  PIP  n"  545-98  (CONICET),  and 
the  National  Geographic  Foundation  grant  n°  7104-01. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Coscaron,  M.  C.  and  J.  C.  Giacchi.  1987.  Revision  de  la  subfamilia  Microtominac.  III.  Micro- 
tomus conspicillaris  (Drury,1782)  (Heteroptera:  Reduviidae).  Physis.  Revista  de  la  Soeiedad 
Argentina  de  Ciencias  Naturales  (Buenos  Aires)  Seccion  C.  45:  59-65. 

Coscaron,  M.  C.  and  J.  C.  Giacchi.  1985  (1987).  Revision  de  la  subfamilia  Microtominac 
(Hemiptera,  Reduviidae).  I.  Microtomus  lunifer  (Berg).  Revista  de  la  Soeiedad  Entomologica 
Argentina  44:  243-  250. 

Coscaron,  M.  C.,  M.  C.  Melo,  and  IN.  Cuello.  2003.  Synonymizing  Microtomus  sticheli  Costa 
Lima,  1935  under  A/,  tihiulis  Stichel,  1 926  and  redcscription  of  the  species.  (Heteroptera: 
Reduviidae).  Zootaxa  288:  1-6. 


254  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Costa  Lima,  A.  da.  1835.  Genero  Microtomus  Illiger,  1807  (Reduviidae:  Microtominae).  Anais  da 
Academia  Brasileira  de  Ciencias  7  (4):  315-  323. 

Giacchi,  J.  C.  and  M.  C.  Coscaron.  1986.  Revision  de  la  subfamilia  Microtominae.  II.  Microtomus 
purcis  (Drury,  1872),  M.  luctuosiis  (Stal,  1854)  y  M.  cinctipes  (Stal,  1858).  Physis.  Revista  de  la 
Sociedad  Argentina  de  Ciencias  Naturales  (Buenos  Aires)  Seccion  C  44:  103-  1 12. 

Giacchi,  J.  C.  and  M.  C.  Coscaron.  1989  (1992).  Revision  de  la  subfamilia  Microtominae.  IV. 
Microtomus  gavi  (Spinola,  1852)  y  M.  pessoai  Lent  y  Juarez  1956  (Heteroptera,  Reduviidae). 
Physis  Revista  de  la  Sociedad  Argentina  de  Ciencias  Naturales  ( Buenos  Aires)  Seccion  C.  47:  67- 

71. 

Maldonado  Capriles,  J.  1990.  Systematic  Catalogue  of  the  Reduviidae  of  the  World  (Insecta: 
Heteroptera).  Caribbean  Journal  of  Science  (Special  Edition).  694  pp. 

Maldonado  Capriles,  J.  and  J.  A.  Santiago-Blay.  1991.  Classification  of  Homalocoris  (Heter- 
optera: Reduviidae:  Hammacerinae),  with  the  description  of  a  new  species.  Proceedings  of  the 
Entomological  Society  of  Washington  93:703-708. 

Schuh,  R.  T.  and  J.  A.  Slater.  1995.  True  Bugs  of  the  World  (Hemiptera:  Heteroptera).  Classifi- 
cation and  Natural  History.  Comstock  Publishing  Associates.  Cornell  University  Press.  Ithaca, 
New  York,  U.S.A.  336pp. 


Vol.  115.  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 255 

TAXONOMIC  AND  BIOLOGICAL  OBSERVATIONS  ON 

LEISTOTROPHUS  VERSICOLOR 
(COLEOPTERA:  STAPHYLINIDAE)  FROM  MEXICO1 

Juan  \l:n  i|in  /   and  Julieta  Asiain: 

ABSTRACT:  Taxonomic  information  and  illustrations  of  habitus  and  aedeagus  are  included  to  iden- 
tify Leistotwphus  versicolor  (Gravenhorst  1806).  Geographic  distribution  and  field  observations  in 
Mexico  are  included,  based  on  specimens  from  six  collections,  fieldwork,  and  bibliography. 

KEY  WORDS:  Leistotrophits  versicolor,  Staphylinidae,  taxonomy,  biology,  geographic  distribution, 
Mexico 

The  biology  of  the  rove  beetle,  Leistotrophus  versicolor  (Gravenhorst  1806) 
has  been  studied  in  Costa  Rica  (Alcock  and  Forsyth  1988,  Forsyth  and  Alcock 
1990a,  b).  The  previous  studies  report  sexual  dimorphism,  with  males  having 
longer  bodies  and  mandibles  (Fig.  1 );  however,  some  males  with  small  body  size 
may  be  engaged  in  "female  mimicry"  to  reduce  aggressive  behavior  from  larger 
males  and  as  a  strategy  to  gain  access  to  females.  The  large  males  show  resource 
defense,  repelling  aggressively  other  males  and  increasing  their  opportunities  for 
access  to  females  in  search  of  alimentary  resources.  The  resources  defended  by 
L.  versicolor  reported  in  previous  studies  are  carcasses,  dung,  and  decaying 
fruits.  Furthermore,  proximity  to  these  resources  permits  the  beetle  to  wait  for 
prey,  particularly  adult  flies  (Forsyth  and  Alcock  1990a). 

Biological  knowledge  of  L.  versicolor  is  remarkable  as  compared  to  other  sta- 
phylinids,  but  is  based  only  on  limited  studies  from  sites  in  Costa  Rica  (Mon- 
teverde);  no  additional  information  has  been  reported  for  other  sites  from  their 
widespread  distribution  (tropical  and  subtropical  forest  from  Mexico  to  Argen- 
tina). 

In  Mexico,  the  study  of  staphylinids  has  received  a  considerable  impulse  with 
the  recent  work  by  Navarrete-Heredia  et  al.  (2002),  where  L.  versicolor  is  record- 
ed for  the  first  time  for  the  Mexican  states  of  Chiapas,  Hidalgo,  Oaxaca,  Puebla, 
San  Luis  Potosi,  Tabasco,  and  Tamaulipas  (previous  records  were  restricted  to 
Veracruz).  New  records  were  also  reported  for  Belize,  El  Salvador,  and  Hon- 
duras. All  records  given  by  Navarrete-Heredia  et  al.  (2002)  are  at  state  level  for 
Mexico,  and  at  country  level  for  sites  outside  Mexico,  thus  making  it  difficult  to 
know  more  precisely  the  geographic  distribution  of  the  species.  Furthermore,  no 
taxonomic  information  is  included  to  identify  the  species. 

Our  goal  is  to  contribute  to  the  biological  knowledge  of  L.  versicolor  in  Mex- 
ico, including  taxonomic  information,  illustrations,  geographical  distribution, 
and  biological  observations  in  the  field. 


1  Received  on  September  2,  2004.  Accepted  on  November  9,  2004. 

2  Laboratorio  dc  Sistematica  Animal,  Centre  de  Investigaciones  Hiologicas.  I  Al  II   Apurtudo  postal 
1-69,  Plaza  Juarez,  Pachuca.  Hidalgo,  Mexico,  CP  42001.  F-mails:  jmarquez@uaeh.reduaeh.mx, 
asiainae(o!yahoo.com,  respectively. 

Mailed  on  March  15.  2005 


256  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


METHODS 

Taxonomic  information  is  based  on  Navarrete-Heredia  et  al.  (2002)  and  Mar- 
quez  et  al.  (2004).  Distribution  records  were  obtained  from  the  literature  (Sharp 
1884,  Blackwelder  1944,  Forsyth  and  Alcock  1990a,  b,  Herman  200 1 ,  Navarrete- 
Heredia  et  al.  2002,  Marquez  et  al.  2004)  and  revision  of  the  more  important 
staphylinid  collections  in  Mexico  (codes  identify  collections  in  the  text)  [Colec- 
cion Nacional  de  Insectos,  Institute  de  Biologia,  UNAM,  Silvia  Santiago 
(CNIN);  Museo  de  Zoologia,  Facultad  de  Ciencias,  UNAM,  Juan  J.  Morrone 
(MZFC);  Coleccion  de  Coleoptera,  Universidad  Autonoma  del  Estado  de 
Hidalgo,  Juan  Marquez  (CC-UAEH);  Coleccion  Entomologica  del  Institute  de 
Ecologia,  A.  C.,  Leonardo  Delgado  (IEXA);  Coleccion  Entomologica,  Centra  de 
Estudios  en  Zoologia,  Universidad  de  Guadalajara,  Jose  Luis  Navarrete  (CZUG); 
Coleccion  Jose  Luis  Navarrete-Heredia  (JLN)].  Photographs  were  taken  with  a 
digital  camera  attached  to  a  microscope. 

We  took  several  measurements  of  the  specimens  with  a  scale  attached  to  the 
microscope;  we  considered  only  the  specimens  deposited  in  CC-UAEH  and 
MZFC  collections  because  the  individuals  are  adequately  pinned.  Specimens  in 
other  collections  are  pinned  with  the  abdomen  contracted  and  the  head  in  a  posi- 
tion that  makes  it  difficult  to  measure.  The  specimens  of  the  remaining  collec- 
tions (except  CC-UAEH  and  MZFC)  were  checked  during  brief  visits  that 
allowed  little  time  to  perform  a  morphometric  analysis. 

Biological  information  is  based  on  field  observation  and  label  data  of  the  spec- 
imens analyzed.  We  observed  and  collected  L.  versicolor  in  the  municipality  of 
Tepehuacan  de  Guerrero,  near  the  town  of  Chilijapa  in  the  state  of  Hidalgo  (N 
21°  1.191',  W  98°  51.812').  The  site  is  located  in  the  Sierra  Madre  Oriental  bio- 
geographic  province,  which  includes  tropical  forest  at  low  altitude  (near  1000  m) 
and  cloud  forest  at  high  altitude  (1300  m  or  more),  with  several  degrees  of 
human  perturbation.  Field  work  lasted  for  three  days  (June  21  to  23,  2004),  with 
visits  to  several  sites,  collecting  directly  and  with  carrion,  fruit,  interception 
flight,  and  light  traps. 

TAXONOMIC  NOTES 

Leistotrophus  versicolor  (Gravenhorst  1806)  (Fig.  1) 

Staphylinus  versicolor  Gravenhorst  1806:  119. 

Generic  Diagnosis:  anterior  angles  of  pronotum  prominent  and  acute; 
translucent  postcoxal  process  of  pronotum  a  narrow  flange;  mesosternum  with 
complete  mid-longitudinal  carina;  mouthparts  directed  more  ventrally  than  ante- 
riorly (Navarrete-Heredia  et  al.  2002). 

Species  Diagnosis:  total  body  length  15-27  mm;  black,  with  reddish  brown 
setae  at  pronotum  and  elytra,  and  yellow  setae  at  abdomen,  especially  at  fifth  and 
sixth  visible  segments;  dorsal  surface  rugose;  antennae  slender,  with  first  five 
segments  long  and  remaining  segments  transverse;  head  conspicuously  wide; 
mandibles  from  twice  as  long  as  head  (mainly  in  males)  to  similar  length  as  head 


Vol.  115.  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 


257 


(mainly  in  females);  pronotum  shorter  and  narrower  than  head  and  elytra,  with 
punctures  at  anterior  angles;  lateral  margin  of  elytra  carinate;  legs  with  red  and 
black  spots;  aedeagus  as  in  figure  Ic-d  (Marquez  et  al.  2004). 

Leistotrophus patriarchicus  Scudder  1876  is  a  fossil  species  known  from  the 
U.S.A.  No  others  species  are  known  for  this  genus  (Herman  2001 ). 


(I 


Figure  1.  Leistotrophus  versicoloi;  dorsal  view  of:  a,  male;  b,  female.  Drawing  of  aedea- 
gus: c,  dorsal  view;  d,  lateral  view  (line  =  0.5  mm). 


258 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


.c    ~    o    >i         fi   <u 

I>|1IM 
ssl£l^| 


o 
o 


g, 

c/3 


-  5 1 1~  * s 
1 1 '!  .a  .25.8  g  3 

•rT  -s    ^  .22  c  -5        t= 

fe  B  ^  S  °  o 
o       <y       w 
tS       a, 

tS       < 
•3 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 259 

Geographic  Distribution.  Leistotrophus  versicolor  is  a  Neotropical  species, 
with  Tamaulipas  (Mexico)  as  its  northern  limit  and  Argentina  as  its  southern 
limit.  It  may  be  collected  in  tropical  and  subtropical  areas,  with  predominance  of 
rain  and  cloud  forests.  In  Mexico,  the  species  is  distributed  in  Chiapas,  the  Gulf 
of  Mexico  and  the  Sierra  Madre  Oriental  provinces  (Fig.  2).  Records  from  Ar- 
gentina are  included  in  Blackwelder  (1944)  and  Navarrete-Heredia  et  al.  (2002), 
but  not  in  Herman  (2001),  although  the  latter  is  the  most  complete  and  current 
checklist  of  Staphylinidae  of  the  world.  Unfortunately,  records  from  Mexico  are 
not  included  in  that  work. 

Material  Examined:  MEXICO  (asterisks  indicate  state  or  country  records).  Chiapas:  Berrioza- 
bal.  El  Suspiro  (1,  MZFC);  Ocosingo,  Monies  Azules  (1,  IEXA);  El  Chorreadero,  Tuxtla  Gutierrez 
(7,  CNIN);  Finca  Prusia,  Jaltenango  (1,  CNIN);  Rancho  Los  Compadres,  Ocozocoautla  (1,  CN1N). 
Hidalgo:  Tepehuacan  de  Guerrero,  Chilijapa  (5,  CC-UAEH).  Oaxaca:  San  Mateo  Yetla,  Valle  Nacion- 
al  (1,  CNIN).  Puebla:  Xicotepec  de  Juarez,  Hidroelectrica  "Patla"  (3,  MZFC);  San  Lorenzo  (1. 
CNIN).  San  Luis  Potosi:  Xilitla  (1,  CNIN).  Tabasco.*  Tamaulipas.*  Veracruz:  Los  Tuxtlas,  Playa  Es- 
condida,  San  Andres  Tuxtla,  Estacion  Biologica  "Los  Tuxtlas"  (2,  MZFC;  1,  IEXA;  2,  CNIN);  Cate- 
maco  (1,  CNIN);  Teocelo  (2,  MZFC;  1  CZUG;  13,  CNIN);  Coatepec,  Briones  (1,  IEXA);  El  Fortin 
de  las  Flores  (2,  CNIN);  Torutla,  Zacuapam  ( 1,  MZFC;  1,  CC-UAEH);  Sierra  de  Atoyac,  Atoyaquillo 
(1,  IEXA);  Cordoba,  Guadalupe  del  Barrial  ( 1,  JLN),  Tajin  (5,  CNIN);  Suchi  (1,  CNIN);  Otatitlan  (1. 
CNIN);  Tuxpan,  Misantla  and  Xalapa  (Sharp,  1884).  OTHER  COUNTRIES  (asterisks  indicate  coun- 
try records  only):  Belize,*  Guatemala  (Calderas,  San  Jeronimo,  Cubilguitz,  Zapote  and  La  Tinta; 
Sharp,  1884),  El  Salvador,*  Honduras,*  Nicaragua  (San  Carlos,  Estacion  Biologica  "Bartola";  2, 
MZFC;  Chontales;  Sharp,  1884),  Costa  Rica  (Cache,  Irazu;  Sharp;  1884;  Puntarenas,  Monteverde; 
Forsyth  and  Alcock.  1990a),  Panama  (Bugaba,  David,  Volcan  de  Chiriqui,  San  Lorenzo  and  Tole; 
Sharp,  1884),  Colombia,*  Ecuador,*  Peru.*  Bolivia,*  Paraguay,*  Venezuela,*  Guyana,*  Surinam,* 
Brazil  (type  locality:  Brasiliae,  Para;  Herman,  2001;  Rio  de  Janeiro;  Sharp,  1884)  and  Argentina.* 

BIOLOGICAL  OBSERVATIONS 

In  Tepehuacan  de  Guerrero,  Hidalgo,  we  observed  several  specimens  of 
L.  versicolor  during  three  days.  We  installed  three  carrion  traps,  an  interception 
tight  trap,  a  decayed  fruit  trap,  and  a  light  trap  concurrently.  The  traps  were 
unsuccessful  in  catching  any  specimens,  but  several  individuals  were  oberserved 
near  cow  dung  at  the  periphery  of  the  forest  where  human  perturbation  is  notable. 
It  is  possible  that  the  species  is  diurnal,  because  it  was  not  attracted  to  the  light 
and  was  not  seen  at  night  near  cow  dung;  however,  one  specimen  from  Veracruz 
(Coatepec)  and  another  from  Chiapas  (Ocosingo)  were  collected  at  night  with  an 
electric  light.  It  would  be  important  to  study  activity  throughout  a  complete  day 
and  to  observe  if  conduct  changes  over  time. 

Some  specimens  observed  arrived  at  dung,  where  they  stood  to  capture  prey. 
Other  organisms  stood  in  the  vegetation  near  the  dung.  We  saw  one  specimen 
move  at  great  speed  to  capture  a  fly.  These  observations  agree  with  previous 
studies  (Alcock  and  Forsyth  1988,  Forsyth  and  Alcock  199()a). 

We  did  not  observe  individuals  defending  cow  dung,  but  it  is  probable  that  it 
occurs.  Also,  we  did  not  observe  specimens  on  other  previously  reported  sub- 
strates, namely  carrion  and  decayed  fruit.  Foraging  and  resource  defense  may 
vary  among  different  geographic  areas,  because  availability  of  resources  is  dif- 


260  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ferent.  Cow  dung  was  abundant  at  the  study  site  and  was  the  only  substrate  where 
specimens  were  observed.  It  would  be  important  to  study  the  conduct  of  forag- 
ing and  resource  defense  with  varying  abundance  of  resources,  because  it  is  like- 
ly that  the  species  is  able  to  adapt  its  strategy  opportunistically. 

The  specimen  collected  from  Sierra  de  Atoyac,  Veracruz,  probably  exhibited 
a  conduct  of  foraging  and  resource  defense  near  commercial  gravy  spilled  acci- 
dentally on  the  forest  floor.  Its  collectors  observed  the  beetle  near  the  gravy  and 
unsuccessfully  tried  to  catch  it;  10-15  minutes  later  the  beetle  returned  to  the 
same  site  and  the  collectors  failed  on  a  second  occasion;  10-15  minutes  later  the 
specimen  returned  again  and  was  finally  collected  (L.  Delgado  pers.com.).  This 
can  be  a  striking  example  of  foraging  and  resource  defense  by  L.  versicolor,  and 
suggests  a  possible  study  that  could  be  performed  on  the  preferences  of  this  bee- 
tle to  forage  and  defend  distinct  resources  at  different  sites.  Another  specimen 
from  Teocelo,  Veracruz  was  collected  near  a  decaying  banana,  yet  another  dif- 
ferent substrate  probably  defended  by  the  insect. 

Predatory  strategies  of  L.  versicolor  are  rather  uncommon  compared  with 
other  staphylinids,  because  it  is  a  specialized  obligate  predator  of  adult  dipterans, 
and  exhibits  unusual  flexibility  and  complexity  in  prey  capture  (Forsyth  and 
Alcock  1990b).  Due  to  its  conduct,  specimens  have  not  been  observed  or  col- 
lected within  or  underneath  dung,  as  have  other  staphylinids  (for  example  some 
species  of  Philonthm  and  Plar\'dracus  collected  in  the  same  dung  visited  by 
specimens  of  L.  versicolor  in  Hidalgo,  Mexico).  Also,  it  is  known  that  L.  versi- 
color emits  drops  of  anal  secretions  with  a  dung  odor  attractive  to  prey.  These 
droplets  can  be  deposited  on  the  substrate  or  the  beetle  may  wave  its  abdomen 
tip  with  its  secretion  devices  toward  flies  that  happen  to  approach  it.  The  ability 
to  employ  different  strategies  allows  the  beetle  to  forage  in  areas  without  fly- 
attracting  rotting  materials  (Newton  1973,  Forsyth  and  Alcock  1990b,  Dettner 
and  Liepert  1994,  Frank  and  Thomas  1999). 

Only  two  or  three  specimens  were  observed  near  each  pile  of  cow  dung,  but 
we  were  unable  to  identify  the  sex  of  all  the  specimens,  and  only  five  were  col- 
lected. It  is  possible  that  the  abundance  of  individuals  in  Hidalgo  is  not  as  high 
as  reported  for  Costa  Rica  (up  to  20  individuals  per  pile  of  cow  dung;  Forsyth 
and  Alcock  1990a),  but  our  collection  and  observation  times  were  very  reduced 
and  not  directly  focused  on  the  study  of  this  species.  Three  of  the  five  specimens 
are  male,  and  two  are  female.  Female  length  is  22  and  20  mm  respectively,  and 
male  length  is  20,  19.5,  and  15  mm,  respectively. 

Of  the  ten  specimens  in  the  MZFC  collection,  three  from  Xicotepec  de  Juarez, 
Puebla,  have  a  total  body  length  of  18.6,  17.4  (males)  and  17.0  mm  (female); 
four  specimens  from  three  localities  in  Veracruz  have  a  total  body  length  of  1 7. 1 
(male),  21.0,  19.3,  and  15.6  mm  (females);  two  specimens  from  Nicaragua  have 
a  total  body  length  of  27.4  (male)  and  18.7  mm  (female);  and  one  specimen  from 
Chiapas  has  a  total  body  length  of  19.0  mm  (male). 

Unfortunately,  we  have  too  few  specimens  to  generalize  whether  these  differ- 
ences are  or  are  not  consistent  with  the  previous  information  indicating  that 


Vol.  115.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 261 

males  are  longer  than  females,  but  it  could  be  interesting  to  study  whether  the 
male-female  length  proportion  is  the  same  at  several  localities  where  the  species 
is  distributed.  The  difference  in  male  body  length  is  noted  in  the  three  specimens 
collected  and  probably  also  the  conduct  of  "female  mimicry"  at  the  site,  but  we 
were  unable  to  study  this  question  in  more  detail. 

Mandibles  of  L.  versicolor  capture  the  prey,  pinch  the  body  with  a  pair  of 
acute  teeth,  secrete  digestive  fluids  and  undertake  a  preoral  digestion,  as  in  the 
majority  of  predator  staphylinids  (Frank  and  Thomas  1999).  Mandible  length 
with  respect  to  head  length  of  the  five  specimens  collected  are  1.30,  1.19  and 
1.04  times,  respectively,  for  the  three  males,  and  1.22  and  1.12  times,  respec- 
tively, for  the  two  females.  Mandible  length  with  respect  to  head  length  of  the  ten 
specimens  of  MZFC  collection  are  2.20,  1.75,  1.65,  1.56  and  1.33  for  males,  and 
1 .34,  1.25,  1.25,  1.13,  and  1 . 1 3  for  females.  It  is  necessary  to  measure  more  spec- 
imens to  obtain  an  appropriate  sample  with  statistical  significance,  and  to  cor- 
roborate whether  males  have  mandibles  longer  than  females  at  different  sites 
throughout  their  geographic  distribution. 

Our  observations  and  records  are  limited,  but  lead  us  to  wonder  whether  the 
remarkable  biological  characteristics  of  this  species  actually  can  vary  at  different 
sites  under  different  conditions,  and  how  this  presumed  variation  relates  to  the 
evolution  of  the  species.  Also,  we  hope  to  contribute  additional  information  to 
the  poorly  studied  Mexican  staphylinids. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  David  S.  Gernandt  (Centre  de  Investigaciones  Biologicas,  UAEH),  Juan  J.  Morrone 
(Facultad  de  Ciencias,  UNAM)  and  two  anonymous  reviewers  for  the  critical  revision  of  the  manu- 
script. Thanks  to  Julio  I.  Islas  (Centra  de  Investigaciones  Biologicas,  UAEH)  for  his  assistance  in  the 
field.  Thanks  to  Leonardo  Delgado  (Institute  de  Ecologia,  A.  C.)  for  the  biological  information  given 
to  the  work.  The  research  was  supported  by  program  PROMEP/SEP  and  "Programa  Institutional  de 
Investigacion"(UAEH-DIP-ICBI-AAB-039). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Alcock,  J.  and  A.  Forsyth.  1988.  Post-copulatory  aggression  toward  their  mates  by  males  of  the 
rove  beetle  Leistotrophns  versicolor  (Coleoptera:  Staphylinidae).  Behavioral  Ecology  and  Socio- 
biology  22:  303-30X. 

Blacknelder,  R.  P..  1944.  Checklist  of  the  Coleopterous  insects  of  Mexico,  Central  America,  the 
West  Indies,  and  South  America.  Part  1.  Bulletin  of  the  United  States  National  Museum  185.  pp. 
i-xii+  1-188. 

Dettner,  K.  and  C.  l.iepcrt.  1994.  Chemical  Mimicry  and  Camouflage,  http://www.unijui.tche.br/- 
lenicem  mimetismo.htm.  Consulted  on  July  7.  2004 

Forsyth,  A.  and  J.  Alcock.  1990a.  Female  mimicry  and  resource  defense  polygyny  by  males  of  a 
tropical  rove  beetle,  Leistotrophus  versicolor  (Coleoptera:  Staphylinidae).  Behavioral  Ecology 
and  Sociobiology  26:  325-330. 


262  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Forsyth,  A.  and  J.  Alcock.  1 990b.  Ambushing  and  prey-luring  as  alternative  foraging  tactics  of  the 
fly-catching  rove  beetle  Leistotmplnis  versicolor  (Coleoptera:  Staphylinidae).  Journal  of  Insect 
Behavior  3(6):  703-718. 

Frank,  J.  H.  and  M.  C.  Thomas.  1999.  Rove  beetles,  Staphylinidae.  http://creatures.ifas.edu/misc/ 
beetles/rove_beetles.htm.  Consulted  on  July  7,  2004. 

Herman,  L.  H.  Jr.  2001 .  Catalog  of  the  Staphylinidae  (Insecta:  Coleoptera),  1758  to  the  end  of  the 
second  millennium.  VI.  Staphylinine  group  (Part  3).  Staphylininae:  Staphylinini  (Quediina, 
Staphylinina,  Tanygnathinina,  Xanthopygina),  Xantholinini.  Staphylinidae  incertae  sedis. 
Fossils,  Protactinae.  Bulletin  of  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History  265:  3021-3839. 

Marquez,  J.,  J.  Asiain,  and  Q.  Santiago-Jimenez.  2004.  Especies  de  Staphylininae  (Coleoptera: 
Staphylinidae)  de  "El  Mirador,"  Veracruz,  Mexico.  Dugesiana  10(2):  21-46. 

Navarrete-Heredia,  J.  L.,  A.  F.  Newton,  M.  K.  Thayer,  J.  S.  Ashe,  and  D.  S.  Chandler.  2002. 
Guia  ilustrada  para  los  generos  de  Staphylinidae  (Coleoptera)  de  Mexico.  Illustrated  guide  to  the 
genera  of  Staphylinidae  (Coleoptera)  of  Mexico.  Universidad  de  Guadalajara  y  CONABIO. 
Guadalajara,  Jalisco,  Mexico.  401  pp. 

Newton,  A.  F.  Jr.  1973.  A  systematic  revision  of  the  rove  beetle  genus  Platydracus  in  North 
America  (Coleoptera:  Staphylinidae).  Ph.  D.  (Dissertation).  Department  of  Biology.  Harvard 
University.  Cambridge,  Massachusetts.  318  pp. 

Sharp,  D.  1884.  Fam.  Staphylinidae,  pp.  313-392,  pis.  8-9.  //;,  Biologia  Centrali-Americana.  In- 
secta, Coleoptera.  Volume  1(2).  Taylor  &  Francis.  London,  England. 


Vol.  115.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 263 

NEW  SPECIES  OF  THE  GENERA 

STICTOPHAULA  HEBARD  AND  MIROLLIA  STAL 

(ORTHOPTERA:  TETTIGONIIDAE:  PHANEROPTERINAE) 

FROM  CHINA1 

A.  V.  Gorochov3  and  Le  Kang2 

ABSTRACT.  This  paper  describes  a  new  species  of  Stictophaula  Hebard  (S.  sinica  sp.  n.)  and  five 
species  of  Mirrollia  Stal,  four  of  which  are  new  to  science  (M.  bispinosa  sp.  n.,  M.  hainani  sp.  n.,  M. 
yunnani  sp.  n.,  M.  angusticerca  sp.  n.,  and  M.  composite!  Bey-Bienko)  all  from  southern  China.  Genital 
complex  and  other  diagnostic  characters  are  illustrated. 

KEY  WORDS:  new  species,  Stictophaula,  Mirrollia.  Orthoptera,  Tettigoniidae,  Phaneropterinae, 
genitalia,  China 

The  genus  Mirollia  was  established  by  Stal  in  1873,  a  subsequent  designation 
for  Locus ta  (Phylloptera)  carinata  de  Haan.  Subsequently,  several  authors 
(Hebard  1922;  Karny  1925,  1926;  Shiraki  1930;  Bey-Bienko  1957,  1962;  Ingrisch 
1990,  1998;  Mu,  He  and  Wang  1998;  Ingrisch  and  Shishodia  1998,  2000;  Goro- 
chov 1999,  2003b)  have  described  22  species  (or  23  species  and  subspecies),  from 
Philippines,  Java,  Borneo,  southern  China,  Vietnam,  Thailand,  and  India. 

Hebard  erected  the  genus  Stictophaula  in  1922  for  three  new  species,  S.  bak- 
eri,  S.  micra,  and  S.  quadridens  from  Singapore,  and  three  known  species,  Phaula 
spinosolaminata  Brunner,  Locus  ta  (Phaneroptera)  trichopus  Haan  (both  from 
Java)  and  Phaula  chlorotica  Brunner  (from  Singapore).  Subsequently,  Ingrisch 
(1994)  described  three  new  species  from  Thailand.  Gorochov  (1999,  2003a) 
described  ten  new  species  and  subspecies  from  Vietnam,  Thailand,  Java,  Borneo, 
and  Sumatra.  Gorochov  (1999)  removed  Locusta  (Phaneroptera)  trichopus  De 
Haan  and  Stictophaula  ocellata  Ingrisch,  1994  from  Stictophaula  and  placed  them 
in  the  genus  Arnobia  Stal,  1876. 

Currently,  23  species  (or  24  species  and  subspecies)  of  Mirollia  and  16  species 
(or  17  species  and  subspecies)  of  Stictophaula  are  known  from  the  Oriental 
region.  Of  those,  five  species  of  Mirollia  but  no  species  of  Stictophaula  have  been 
recorded  from  China. 

In  examining  the  collections  of  the  Beijing  Institute  of  Zoology,  Chinese 
Academy  of  Sciences  (IZCAS)  and  of  the  Beijing  Agricultural  University  (AU), 
we  found  one  new  species  of  Stictophaula  (S.  sinica)  and  four  new  species  of 
Mirollia  (M.  bispinosa,  M.  hainani,  M.  yunnani,  and  M.  angusticerca},  which  are 
described  herein.  The  female  of  M.  composita  Bey-Bienko  is  described  for  the 
first  time  (formerly  this  species  was  known  only  from  a  single  male).  The  signif- 


1  Submitted  on  August  11,  2002.  Accepted  on  November  18.  2004. 

2  State  Key  Laboratory  of  Integrated  Management  of  Pest  Insects  and  Rodents,  Institute  of  Zoology, 
Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences,  Beijing  100080,  People's  Republic  of  China.  Corresponding  Author. 
Emails:  Ikangfa  cashq.ac.cn.  lkang(wpanda. ioz.ac.cn.  and  Ikangfa'ioz.ac.cn. 

'Zoological  Institute,  Russian  Academy  of  Sciences,  Saint  Petersburg   199034  Russia.   E-mail: 
orthopt(«  /in.ru. 

Mailed  on  March  15,  2005 


264  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


icant  taxonomic  characters  for  these  genera  are  details  of  the  male  and  female 
abdominal  apex,  especially  sclerites  of  the  male  genitalia,  male  stridulatory  appa- 
ratus (Ingrisch  1994,  1998;  Gorochov  1999;  Ingrisch  and  Shishodia  2000),  and  the 
head  rostrum  (Gorochov  1999,  2003b). 

Mirollia  Stal,  1873 
Mirollia  bispinosa,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1,7-13) 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  male,  CHINA:  HUNAN  PROVINCE:  Cili,  Jianya, 
26.VIII.1988  (collector  unknown)  (IZCAS).  Paratypes.  CHINA:  HUNAN  PRO- 
VINCE: 1  male,  Cili,  2.VIII.1988  (collector  unknown)  (IZCAS);  1  male,  Chang- 
sha,  15.VII.1985,  coll.  Chen  Naizhong  (AU);  GUANGXI  PROVINCE:  1  male, 
1  female,  Guilin,  Yanshan,  9. IX.  1952  (male)  and  5. VI.  1953  (female)  (collector  un- 
known) (IZCAS). 

Description:  Male  (holotype).  Body  yellowish  green  with  dark  brown  spots  on 
antennae  (including  scape),  numerous  dots  on  upper  half  of  pronotum  and  along 
anal  edge  of  tegmina,  and  a  large  spot  on  widened  part  of  dorsal  part  of  upper 
tegmen  (this  spot  occupies  central  area  of  this  part;  light  brown  stridulatory  vein 
divides  this  spot  into  smaller  proximal  and  larger  distal  parts;  size  of  this  spot 
approximately  equal  to  size  of  mirror  of  lower  tegmen);  slight  brownish  darkenings 
near  auditory  organ  of  fore  tibiae  present  also.  Rostrum  distinctly  (but  not  strong- 
ly) S-shaped  in  profile,  similar  to  that  of  M.  fall  ax  Bey-Bienko  (Gorochov,  1999: 
Fig.  87),  but  with  large  lateral  ocelli.  Shape  of  tegmina  as  in  Fig.  1;  upper  tegmen 
with  2  branches  on  RS  and  3  more  or  less  distinct  branches  on  RA  (Fig.  1),  but 
lower  tegmen  with  single  RS  and  4  more  or  less  distinct  branches  on  RA;  hind 
wings  very  distinctly  longer  than  tegmina.  Cerci  comparatively  short,  not  very  thin 
and  not  very  strongly  curved  (Fig.  7);  their  apex  with  characteristic  small  and  heav- 
ily sclerotized  ridge  (Fig.  8);  genital  plate  with  characteristic  shape  of  its  narrow 
hind  part  provided  with  deep  and  very  narrow  hind  notch  (Fig.  9).  Genitalia  with 
rather  long  lateral  lobes  provided  with  2  apical  spines  directed  backward  (these 
spines  almost  immovable  in  relation  to  each  other);  a  pair  of  medial  genital  lobes 
with  small  membranous  upper  (medial)  projections  (armed  by  distinct  denticles) 
and  larger  semi-sclerotized  lower  (lateral)  rounded  additional  lobes  (these  lobes 
without  any  denticles)  (Figs.  10,  11). 

Variation:  Occasionally,  rostrum  more  strongly  S-shaped  than  in  holotype 
[almost  intermediate  between  those  of  M.  fa/lax  and  M.  carinata  (Haan)  (Goro- 
chov, 1999:  Figs.  87,  95)]  and  outer  side  of  proximal  part  of  antennae  dark  brown. 
All  males  with  RS  of  both  tegmina  similar  to  RS  of  upper  tegmen  of  holotype. 

Female:  Similar  to  male  in  general  appearance  and  structure  of  lateral  tegminal 
part,  but  without  dark  spot  on  dorsal  part  of  upper  tegmen.  Apical  part  of  genital 
plate  with  a  pair  of  not  deep  hind  notches;  hind  unpaired  median  projection  of  this 
plate  not  shorter  than  hind  lateral  projections  (Figs.  12,  13);  ovipositor  typical  of 
this  genus. 


Vol.  1 1 5,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 


265 


r\i 


i 


o 

c. 


o 


g- 


C3 
.C 

'3 

-=: 


o. 

I 

o 

d 
p. 

I- 

•5  P- 

.B-  * 

•5  -i 


-   c 
5i  '-> 

~  'r 
-=  cd 

f=  ^ 


C. 
__ 

- 


S     C- 


g 
^ 


_1    c. 
ca 

l! 


266 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


28 


27 


Figs.  7-28.  Mirollia.  7-13,  M.  bispinosa  sp.  n.  (7-11,  holotype);  14-22,  M.  hainani  sp.  n. 
(14-20,  holotype);  23-28,  M.  yunnani  sp.  n.  Left  male  cercus  (7,  14,  23)  and  its  apical  part 
(8)  from  above;  distal  part  of  male  genital  plate  from  below-behind  (9,  15,  24);  male  gen- 
italia  from  above  (10,  16,  25),  from  side  (11,  17,  26),  and  from  below  (18,  27);  female 
genital  plate  from  below  (12,  21)  and  from  side  (13,  22);  structures  of  male  genitalia: 
upper  medial  lobe  (19)  and  apex  of  lower  medial  lobe  (20)  from  above,  apical  part  of  lat- 
eral lobe  from  below-behind  (28). 


Vol.  115.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 267 

Measurements  (length  in  mm):  Body:  male,  14-17,  female  18;  body  with 
wings:  male  29-32,  female  32;  pronotum:  male  3.8-4.2,  female  4.5;  legmen:  male 
22-24,  female  24;  hind  femur:  male  12-13,  female  13;  ovipositor  6. 

Differential  diagnosis:  Miwllia  bispinosa  is  most  similar  to  M.  quadripunc- 
tata  Ingrisch,  M.  beybienkoi  Gorochov,  and  M.  caligata  Ingrisch,  but  it  differs 
from  those  in  the  size,  shape,  and  position  of  apical  spines  of  lateral  genital  lobes 
of  male.  From  M.  formosana  Shiraki,  this  new  species  is  distinguished  by  the 
other  coloration  of  scape  (not  reddish  brown),  the  presence  of  numerous  dark 
dots  on  pronotum,  and  the  absence  of  any  tubercles  on  inner  side  of  male  cereal 
base;  from  M.  mfonotata  Mu,  He  and  Wang,  it  differs  in  the  absence  of  any  red 
spots  on  lateral  pronotal  lobes  (it  has  only  blackish  brown  dots  on  upper  part  of 
pronotum),  the  shorter  tegmina  of  female,  and  the  somewhat  other  shape  of 
female  genital  plate. 

Mirollia  hainani,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  2,  14-22) 

Type  Data:  Holotype.  Male,  CHINA:  HAINAN  ISLAND:  Jianfengling, 
14.X.1983,  coll.  Chen  Peizhen  (IZCAS).  Paratypes,  CHINA:  HAINAN  IS- 
LAND: 1  male,  1  female,  Jianfengling,  27. 1  V.I  983  (male)  and  19.VI.1983 
(female),  coll.  Gu  Maobin  (IZCAS);  1  male,  Ledong,  26. VIII.  1984,  coll.  Lin 
Youdong  (IZCAS);  1  male,  Qiongzhong,  8. VII.  1984,  coll.  Lin  Youdong 
(IZCAS);  1  female,  Tongshen,  340  m,  26.111.1960,  coll.  Li  Changqing  (IZCAS); 
1  female,  Yinggen,  200  m,  5. V.I 960,  coll.  Li  Changqing  (IZCAS). 

Description:  Male  (holotype).  Very  similar  to  previous  species  (M.  bi- 
spinosa) in  general  appearance  including  size,  shape  of  body,  and  coloration,  but 
dark  parts  of  antennae  somewhat  smaller,  pronotum  with  only  a  pair  of  dark  dots 
on  fore  half  of  disc,  and  stridulatory  vein  of  upper  tegmen  almost  dark  brown. 
Rostrum  slightly  S-shaped,  almost  as  in  M.  foliolum  Gorochov  (Gorochov,  1999, 
Fig.  97);  lateral  ocelli  medium-sized.  Tegmina  and  hind  wings  almost  as  in 
M.  bispinosa  (Fig.  2);  R  with  2  branches  on  RS  and  3  more  or  less  distinct 
branches  on  RA  in  both  tegmina.  Cerci  rather  long,  but  not  very  thin,  strongly 
curved  and  with  large  apical  hook  (Fig.  14);  genital  plate  with  shape  of  its  nar- 
row part  as  in  Fig.  15  (this  part  with  deep,  but  not  very  narrow,  hind  notch). 
Genitalia  (Figs.  16-18)  with  rather  short  and  curved  lateral  lobes  provided  with 
denticles  on  apical  part;  medial  genital  lobes  well  divided  into  short  upper  addi- 
tional lobes  [these  additional  lobes  with  denticles  on  apical  parts  and  on  proxi- 
mal medial  projections  of  these  lobes  (Fig.  19)]  and  longer  and  rather  narrow 
lower  additional  lobes  [latter  lobes  with  rounded  apex  denticulated  along  its  hind 
edge  above  (Fig.  20)]. 

Variation:  Occasionally,  shape  of  rostrum  almost  as  in  M.  bispinosa,  and 
stridulatory  vein  of  upper  tegmen  somewhat  lighter  than  in  holotype. 

Female:  General  appearance  and  lateral  part  of  tegmina  as  in  male,  but  with- 
out dark  spot  on  dorsal  part  of  upper  tegmen.  Apical  part  of  genital  plate  with  a 
pair  of  somewhat  deeper  (than  in  M.  bispinosa}  hind  notches;  hind  unpaired 


268  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


median  projection  of  this  plate  somewhat  shorter  than  hind  lateral  projections 
(Figs.  21,  22);  ovipositor  indistinguishable  from  that  of  previous  species. 

Measurements  (length  in  mm):  Body:  male  13-17,  female  16-18;  body  with 
wings:  male  25-28,  female  30-32;  pronotum:  male  4-4.4,  female  4.3-4.5;  tegmen: 
male  19-21,  female  23-25;  hind  femur:  male  11-13,  female  12-13;  ovipositor  5.3- 
5.7. 

Differential  diagnosis:  This  new  species  is  more  or  less  similar  to  M.  cari- 
nata  (Haan),  M.  proxima  Gorochov,  M.  javae  Gorochov,  M.  ranongi  Gorochov, 
M.  hexapinna  Ingrisch,  M.  bigemina  Ingrisch,  M.  hamata  Ingrisch,  and  M.  ros- 
tellum  Gorochov,  but  M.  hainani  differs  from  them  in  the  deeper  apical  notch  of 
male  genital  plate,  the  shape  of  male  cerci,  and  the  details  of  male  genitalia  (Figs. 
19,20). 

Mirollia  yunnani,  NEW  SPECIES 

'  (Figs.  3,  23-28) 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  male,  CHINA:  YUNNAN  PROVINCE:  Changyuan, 
1010  m,  16. V.I 980  (collector  unknown)  (IZCAS). 

Description:  Male  (holotype).  Similar  to  M.  hainani  in  size,  structure  of 
body  and  wings,  as  well  as  details  of  coloration,  but  rostrum  as  in  M.  bispinosa, 
cerci  with  small  apical  hook  (Fig.  23),  genital  plate  with  not  deep  and  not  narrow 
hind  notch  (Fig.  24),  and  genitalia  as  in  Figs.  25-27:  their  lateral  lobes  rather 
short  and  with  narrow  denticulated  apex  (Fig.  28),  their  medial  lobes  divided  into 
upper  denticulated  processes  (partly  fused  with  proximal  part  of  lateral  lobes) 
(Fig.  25)  and  longer  and  narrow  lower  additional  lobes  not  denticulated  and 
directed  medially  (Fig.  27). 

Measurements  of  male  (length  in  mm):  Body  15;  body  with  wings  31; 
pronotum  4.5;  tegmen  23;  hind  femur  12. 

Female  unknown. 

Differential  diagnosis:  This  new  species  is  very  similar  to  M.  carinata 
(Haan)  and  partly  similar  to  M.  bigemina  Ingrisch  in  the  shape  of  distal  part  of 
male  genital  plate,  but  M.  yunnani  is  well  distinguished  from  them  in  the  other 
structure  of  male  genitalia  and  shape  of  male  cerci. 

Mirollia  angmticerca,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  4,  29-33) 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  male,  CHINA:  HAINAN  ISLAND:  Jianfengling, 
28. IV.  1983,  coll.  Gu  Maobin  (IZCAS). 

Description:  Male  (holotype).  Size  and  general  shape  of  body  similar  to  pre- 
vious species.  Coloration  light  brownish  (almost  yellow)  with  a  pair  of  small 
brown  spots  behind  eyes,  spotted  antennae  (including  scape),  several  dark  (black- 
ish) dots  on  upper  part  of  pronotum  (including  a  pair  of  larger  dots  on  fore  half  of 
disc  and  6  distinct  dots  along  its  hind  edge),  darkish  small  marks  near  auditory 
organ  and  in  place  of  articulation  of  femora  with  tibiae,  large  brown  spot  on  dor- 


Vol.  115,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 


269 


39 


38 


Figs.  29-39.  Mirollia  and  Stictophaula.  29-33,  M.  angusticerca  sp.  n.;  34-39,  S.  sinica  sp. 
n.  Left  male  cercus  from  above  (29,  34);  distal  part  of  male  genital  plate  from  below- 
behind  (30)  and  from  below  (35);  male  genitalia  from  above  (31,  36)  and  from  side  (32, 
37);  apical  part  of  lateral  lobe  of  male  genitalia  from  side  and  slightly  below  (33);  female 
genital  plate  from  below  (38);  ovipositor  and  genital  plate  from  side  (39). 


sal  part  of  upper  tegmen  including  stridulatory  vein  (this  spot  occupies  this  part 
almost  completely),  and  several  small  dark  spots  on  different  places  of  tcgmina 
and  lower  side  of  hind  tibiae.  Tegmina  with  roundly  angular  subapical  part  of  anal 
edge;  R  with  single  RS  and  3  more  or  less  distinct  branches  on  RA  in  both  teg- 
mina;  hind  wings  as  in  all  previous  species.  Cerci  long  and  thin,  well  curved,  with 
small  apical  hook  (Fig.  29);  genital  plate  with  distal  part  almost  as  in  M.  hainani, 
but  its  lateral  apical  lobes  slightly  longer  and  narrower  (Fig.  30).  Genitalia  with 
long  lateral  lobes  (Figs.  31,  32);  their  distal  part  rounded  and  denticulated  (Fig. 
33);  medial  genital  lobes  also  rounded,  not  divided  and  not  denticulated  (Fig.  31). 


270  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Measurements  of  male  (length  in  mm):  Body  14;  body  with  wings  29; 
pronotum  4.5;  tegmen  22;  hind  femur  12.5. 
Female  unknown. 

Differential  diagnosis:  Mirollia  angusticerca  is  similar  to  M.  longipinna 
Ingrisch  in  the  long  denticulated  lobes  of  male  genitalia,  but  it  well  differs  from 
this  Indian  species  in  the  shape  of  male  genital  plate  and  above-mentioned  gen- 
ital lobes. 

Mirollia  composita  Bey-Bienko,  1962 

(Fig.  5)' 

Material  Examined:  CHINA:  YUNNAN  PROVINCE:  1  male,  1  female, 
Xishuangbanna,  Mengla,  620-650  m,  5. V- 10. VI.  1959,  coll.  Li  Xiaofu  (IZCAS); 
1  male,  1  female,  Xishuangbanna,  Menghun,  1200-1400  m,  25.V-14.VI.  1958, 
coll.  Meng  Xuwu  and  Zhang  Yiran  (IZCAS);  2  males,  1  female,  Xishuangbanna, 
Damenglong,  650  m,  10-21. IV.  1958,  coll.  Meng  Xuwu,  Pu  Fuji  and  Hong 
Chunpei  (IZCAS);  1  female,  Xishuangbanna,  Yiwu,  800-1300  m,  11. V.I 959, 
coll.  Li  Xiaofu  (IZCAS). 

Description  of  female  (nov.):  Very  similar  to  female  of  M  bispinosa  and  M. 
hainani,  but  coloration  of  pronotum  as  in  M.  hainani,  rostrum  of  head  and  geni- 
tal plate  practically  indistinguishable  from  those  of  M  bispinosa.  Lateral  part  of 
tegmina  in  all  these  specimens  with  2  branches  on  RS  and  3  more  or  less  distinct 
branches  on  RA  (as  in  male  from  Fig.  5);  sometimes,  this  part  of  tegmina  with 
sparse  dark  dots  or  very  small  spots. 

Measurements  of  female  (length  in  mm):  Body  16-19;  body  with  wings  30- 
35;  pronotum  4-4.3;  tegmen  21-25;  hind  femur  12-13.5;  ovipositor  5.5-6. 

Genus  Stictophaula  Hebard,  1922 
Stictophaula  sinica,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  6,  34-39) 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  male,  CHINA:  YUNNAN  PROVINCE:  Xishuang- 
banna, Xiaomengyang,  850  m,  24.X.1957,  coll.  Zang  Lingchao  (IZCAS).  Para- 
types.  CHINA:  YUNNAN  PROVINCE:  3  females,  same  data  as  holotype,  but 
25-28.X.1957  and  6.IX.1958,  coll.  Zang  Lingchao  and  Wang  Shuyong  (IZCAS); 
1  female,  Xishuangbanna,  Mengla  County,  620-650  m,  15. VI.  1958,  coll.  Pu  Fuji 
(IZCAS). 

Description.  Male  (holotype).  Structure  of  body  and  size  typical  of  this 
genus.  Coloration  green  with  rather  sparse  small  dark  dots  on  upper  part  of 
pronotum,  numerous  somewhat  larger  blackish  dots  on  fore  femora  (these  dots 
form  4  more  or  less  distinct  spots  on  upper  part  of  femora)  and  near  auditory 
organ  (on  fore  tibiae),  black  small  lower  spines  of  fore  femora,  dark  brown  spot 
on  proximal  half  of  dorsal  part  of  both  tegmina,  and  sparse  small  dark  spots  in 
different  places  of  lateral  part  of  tegmina.  Mirror  of  lower  tegmen  developed,  but 
small  and  triangular,  similar  to  that  of  S.  gialaiensis  Gor.,  S.  daclacensis  Gor., 
and  S.  thaiensis  Gor.  (Gorochov,  1999:  Figs.  1,  3,  5);  R  with  2  branches  on  RS 


Vol.  115.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 271 

and  2  distinct  branches  on  RA  (Fig.  6);  hind  wings  clearly  longer  than  tegmina. 
Cerci  with  hooked  apical  part;  lateral  apical  lobes  of  genital  plate  with  slight  (but 
distinct)  almost  angular  medial  projections  (Fig.  35).  Median  process  of  genitalia 
with  curved  and  comparatively  thin  sclerite  provided  with  rather  numerous  dis- 
tal denticles;  upper  part  of  this  process  membranous  (excepting  its  apex)  (Figs. 
36,  37). 

Female.  Similar  to  male,  but  dorsal  part  of  tegmina  with  very  small  dark  spot 
at  base  of  its  lateral  edge  only.  Genital  plate  short,  triangular,  with  hardy  trun- 
cated apex  (Fig.  38);  ovipositor  as  in  Fig.  39. 

Measurements  (length  in  mm):  Body:  male  22,  female  21-24;  body  with 
wings:  male  46,  female  46-48;  pronotum:  male  5.5,  female  5.8-6.3;  tegmen:  male 
36,  female  37-39;  hind  femur:  male  20.5,  female  21-22;  ovipositor  8.5-9.5. 

Differential  diagnosis:  Stictophaula  sinica  is  similar  to  S.  armata  Ingrisch 
and  S.  grigorenkoi  Gorochov  in  the  shape  of  male  genital  plate  and  sclerite  of 
male  genitalia,  but  the  hind  median  notch  of  this  plate  is  less  narrow,  the  hind  lat- 
eral lobes  of  this  plate  with  distinct  or  more  distinct  medial  projections,  and  the 
above-mentioned  genital  sclerite  is  narrower  than  in  S.  armata  (and  without  basal 
bend  characteristic  of  this  species)  and  distinctly  wider  than  in  S.  grigorenkoi 
(Ingrisch,  1994,  Figs.  1-8;  Gorochov,  1999,  Figs.  76-80). 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The  authors  thank  Miss.  Liu  Chunxiang  for  her  big  technical  assistance.  This  work  was  support- 
ed by  the  foundation  "Lujiaxi  Academic  Exchange  Program"  of  Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences  in 
2001. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Bey-Bienko,  G.  V.  1957.  Tettigonioidea  (Orthoptera)  of  Yunnan.  Results  of  Chinese-Soviet  zoo- 
logical-botanical expeditions  to  South-Western  China  1955-1956.  Entomologicheskoje  Oboz- 
renije  36(2):401-417.  [In  Russian,  with  English  Summary] 

Bey-Bienko,  G.  Y.  1962.  Results  of  Chinese-Soviet  zoological-botanical  expeditions  to  South- 
western China  1955-1957.  New  or  less-known  Tettigonioidea  (Orthoptera)  from  Szechuan  and 
Yunnan.  Trudy  Zoologicheskogo  Instituta  Akademii  Nauk  SSSR  30:  110-138.  [In  Russian,  with 
English  Summary] 

Gorochov,  A.  V.  1999.  New  and  little  known  katydids  of  the  genera  Stictophaula.  Arnobia,  and 
Mirollia  (Orthoptera:  Tettigoniidae:  Phaneropterinae)  from  South-East  Asia.  Russian  Entomo- 
logical Journal  7  (1-2):  1-14. 

Gorochov,  A.  V.  2()()3a.  A  New  species  and  a  new  subspecies  of  Stictophaula  from  Java  (Orthop- 
tera: Tettigoniidae:  Phaneropterinae).  Zoosystematica  Rossica  11(2):  372. 

Gorochov,  A.  V.  2003b.  A  new  species  of  Mirollia  Stal  from  Philippines  (Orthoptera:Tettigoniidae: 
Phaneropterinae).  Zoosystematica  Rossica  12(1):  28. 

Hehard,  M.  1922.  Studies  in  Malayan,  Melanesian  and  Australian  Tettigoniidae  (Orthoptera). 
Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  74:121-299. 

Ingrisch,  S.  1990.  Zur  Laubheuschrecken  Fauna  von  Thailand  (Insecta:  Saltatoria:  Tettigoniidae). 
Senckenbergiana  biologica  70(1/3):  89-138. 


272  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Ingrisch,  S.   1994.  Drei  neue  Arten  der  Gattung  Stictophaula  Hebard  1922  aus  Thailand  (Ensifera: 
Phaneropteridae).  Entomologische  Zeitschrift  (Essen),  104  (13):  245-264. 

Ingrisch,  S.   1998.  Neue  taxa  der  Mirolliini  aus  Sudost-Asien  (Ensifera:  Tettiginioidea:  Phanerop- 
teridae). Entomologische  Zeitschrift  (Essen)  (3):  85-104. 

Ingrisch,  S.  and  M.  S.  Shishodia.   1998.  New  species  and  records  of  Tettigoniidae  from  India 
(Ensifera).  Mitteilungen  der  Schweizerischen  Entomologischen  Gesellschaft  71:  355-371. 

Ingrisch  S.  and  M.  S.  Shishodia.  2000.  New  taxa  and  distribution  records  of  Tettigoniidae  from 
India  (Orthoptera:  Ensifera).  Mitteilungen  der  Miinchner  Entomologischen  Gesellschaft   90:  5- 

37. 

Karny,  H.  H.    1925.  List  of  some  Katydids  (Tettigoniidae)  in  the  Sarawak  Museum.  Sarawak 
Museum  Journal  3(8):35-53. 

Karny,  H.  H.   1926.  Beitrage  zur  Malayischen  Orthopterenfauna  XIII.  Die  Scaphurinen  des  Buiten- 
zorger  Museums. Treubia  9:  12-151. 

Mu  F.,  T.  He,  and  Y.  Wang.    1998.  A  new  species  of  family  Phaneropteridae  (Orthoptera:  Tettigon- 
ioidea).  Entomotaxonomia  20(4):  245-247. 

Shiraki,  T.   1930.  Some  new  species  of  Orthoptera.  Transactions  of  the  Natural  History  Society  of 
Formosa  20:  327-355. 


Vol.  115.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 273 

FIRST  HOST  RECORD  FOR  PTEROMALUS  CARDUI 

(HYMENOPTERA:  PTEROMALIDAE)  ON  UROPHORA 

QUADRIFASCIATA  (DIPTERA:  TEPHRITIDAE) 

IN  SPOTTED  KNAPWEED  (CENTAUREA 
BIEBERSTEINII,  ASTERACEAE)  IN  MICHIGAN,  U.S.A.1 

Jordan  M.  Marshall,2-'  Roger  A.  Burks,4  and  Andrew  J.  Storer 

ABSTRACT:  An  association  between  the  biological  control  agent  Urophoru  quadrifasciata  and  a 
parasitoid,  Ptemmahts  canlui.  was  found  within  seed  heads  of  spotted  knapweed  (Centaurea  bieber- 
steinii)  in  Michigan,  U.S.A.  There  was  a  significant  correlation  between  the  percentage  seed  heads 
with  U.  quadrifasciata  emerging  and  those  with  P.  curdui  emerging.  This  parasitoid  might  reduce  the 
already  limited  effectiveness  of  U.  quadrifasciata  in  controlling  spotted  knapweed. 

KEY  WORDS:  Pteromalus  cardui,  Hymenoptera,  Pteromalidae,  Urophora  quadrifasciata,  Diptera, 
Tephritidae,  spotted  knapweed,  Centaurea  hierherteinii.  Asteraceae,  Michigan.  U.S.A. 

Classical  biological  control  of  exotic  pestiferous  organisms  involves  the  im- 
portation and  release  of  their  natural  enemies,  with  each  release  intended  to 
reduce  the  population  size  of  the  targeted  species  (e.g.  Pedigo  1999,  Speight  et 
al.  1999).  Prior  to  release  of  the  biological  control  agents,  host  specificity  tests 
are  carried  out  under  quarantine  conditions  to  minimize  the  likelihood  of  the 
agent  having  unacceptable  impacts  on  nontarget  species.  During  the  quarantine 
period,  biological  control  agents  are  sterilized  to  ensure  the  agents  are  not  carry- 
ing a  pathogen,  parasite,  or  predator  of  their  own  that  would  result  in  a  failure  of 
the  biological  control  program  (APHIS-PPQ  2003).  Even  with  such  measures  in 
place  to  increase  the  chances  of  a  biological  control  agent,  predators  or  parasites 
native  to  the  release  location  may  become  problematic  for  the  agent. 

Spotted  knapweed,  Centaurea  biebersteinii  de  Candolle  (=  C.  maculosa  auct. 
non  Monnet  de  la  Marck)  (Asteraceae),  is  considered  one  of  the  most  economi- 
cally destructive  weeds  in  rangelands  of  western  North  America  (Harris  and 
Cranston  1979).  It  can  be  found  throughout  the  contiguous  United  States,  Alaska, 
Hawaii,  and  in  all  Canadian  provinces  except  the  Northwest  Territories  and 
Nunavut.  Ecological  impacts  imposed  by  spotted  knapweed  include  increasing 
sedimentation  and  runoff,  decreasing  native  plant  diversity,  and  decreasing  for- 
age quality  for  grazers  (Lacey  et  al.  1989,  Kedzie-Webb  et  al.  2001,  Olson  and 
Wallander  2001). 


1  Received  on  May  13,  2004.  Accepted  on  November  12,  2004. 

:  School  of  Forest   Resources  and   Environmental   Science,  Michigan  Technological   University, 
Houghton,  Ml  4W31,  U.S.A.   E-mail:  (AJS):  stored/  mtu.edu. 

'Current  Address:  Department  of  Forestry,  Wildlife,  and  Fisheries.  University  of  Tennessee,  Knox- 
ville,  TN  37996,  U.S.A.   E-mail:  murshullw  utk.edu. 

4  Department  of  Entomology,   University  of  California,   Riverside,   CA  92521,   U.S.A.   E-mail: 
rogerburksw  yahoo.com. 

Mailed  on  March  15.  2005 


274  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Urophora  quadrifasciata  (Meigen)  (Diptera:  Tephritidae)  is  a  Palearctic  seed 
head  gall  fly  introduced  from  the  Krasnodar  Territory,  Russia,  into  British 
Columbia,  Canada,  in  1972  as  a  biological  control  agent  for  spotted  and  diffuse 
knapweed,  C.  diffusa  Monnet  de  la  Marck  (Asteraceae)  (Harris  1980a).  Over  the 
past  30  years,  subsequent  releases  in  several  American  states  and  Canadian 
provinces  have  allowed  U.  quadrifasciata  to  spread  through  much  of  the  north- 
ern range  of  spotted  and  diffuse  knapweeds  (Story  2002).  In  addition  to  these 
releases,  the  dissemination  of  U.  quadrifasciata  is  aided  by  its  ability  to  disperse 
over  large  distances  and  locate  remote  patches  of  knapweed  (Harris  1986,  Mays 
and  Kok  2003).  It  develops  within  seed  heads  by  diverting  energy  from  the  plant 
to  larval  maturation  by  inducing  gall  production  in  the  plant  (Burkhardt  and 
Zwolfer2002). 

U.  quadrifasciata  has  an  obligate  second  generation  that  overwinters  in  the 
seed  head  as  late-instar  larvae  and  emerges  the  following  May- June  (Myers  and 
Harris  1980,  Harris  1980a).  A  high  supercooling  capacity  (down  to  -35°C)  en- 
ables the  larvae  to  survive  at  extremely  low  temperatures,  providing  an  extension 
of  suitable  habitat  into  areas  experiencing  extended  periods  of  exceptionally  cold 
weather  (Story  et  al.  1993). 

Larval  mortality  within  spotted  knapweed  seed  heads  is  often  caused  by  direct 
predation  by  several  bird  and  small  mammal  species,  as  well  as  indirect  con- 
sumption by  deer  grazing  on  seed  heads  (Story  et  al.  1995).  In  April  2003, 
Pteromalus  cardui  (Erdos)  (Hymenoptera:  Pteromalidae)  (Dzhanokmen  and 
Grissell  2003),  a  Palearctic  parasitic  wasp,  was  reared  from  spotted  knapweed 
seed  heads  collected  at  locations  in  Houghton  County,  Michigan.  During  this 
time,  U.  quadrifasciata  adults  were  also  reared  from  seed  heads  collected  from 
the  same  locations. 

Pteromalus  cardui  has  been  recorded  from  Britain,  Hungary,  Kazakhstan,  and 
The  Czech  Republic  (Graham  1969;  Dzhanokmen  1987,  2001).  It  has  been  re- 
ported to  parasitize  the  tephritids  Tephritis  dilacerata  (Loew)  and  Ensina  sonchi 
(Linnaeus)  on  Sonchus  arvensis  Linnaeus  (Asteraceae),  as  well  as  other  Tephritis 
spp.  on  Ptarmica  cartilaginea  Ledebour  (Asteraceae)  (Dzhanokmen  2001). 
None  of  these  fly  hosts  of  P.  cardui  have  been  recorded  from  northern  Michigan 
(Footeetal.  1993). 

Following  initial  observations  of  the  parasitoid  emerging  from  spotted  knap- 
weed seed  heads,  studies  were  undertaken  to  (1)  develop  evidence  that  the  para- 
sitoid uses  U.  quadrifasciata  as  its  host  in  spotted  knapweed  and  (2)  determine 
whether  there  is  a  relationship  between  emergence  of  the  parasitoid  and  emer- 
gence of  the  seed  head  fly. 

METHODS 

Spotted  knapweed  plants  were  collected  from  1 2  patches  in  Houghton  County, 
Michigan,  from  23  August  to  14  November  2002,  and  stored  at  -8°C  for  6  to  8 
months,  depending  on  the  collection  date.  In  April  and  May  2003,  660  seed  heads 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  5.  Men  cinher  &  December  2004 275 

were  randomly  selected  from  the  12  sites  and  placed  into  vials  to  rear  adult  U. 
quadrifasciata  and  P.  cardui  at  room  temperature.  Eight-dram  plastic  shell  vials 
were  half  filled  with  wet  sand  topped  with  a  layer  of  dry  sand.  Vials  were  cov- 
ered with  cotton  fabric  securing  a  single  knapweed  seed  head  inside,  and  they 
were  monitored  for  insect  emergence  every  3  to  4  days.  The  identity  of  U.  quad- 
rifasciata adults  was  verified  using  White  and  Korneyev  (1989)  and  voucher 
specimens  (1  male  and  1  female)  of  P.  cardui  have  been  deposited  in  the  Insect 
Collection  of  the  University  of  Michigan,  Museum  of  Zoology. 

The  proportion  of  seed  heads  from  which  P.  cardui  emerged  and  from  which 
U.  quadrifasciata  emerged  was  determined  for  each  collection  site,  and  relation- 
ships between  these  proportions  were  tested  using  correlation  analysis  of  arcsine 
transformed  data  (arcsinV/?)  (Zar  1999). 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

One  hundred  seventeen  P.  cardui  adults  emerged  from  the  660  spotted  knap- 
weed seed  heads  placed  in  rearing.  Wasps  were  reared  from  seed  heads  collect- 
ed at  9  of  the  1 2  sites  (Table  1 ),  with  the  first  adults  emerging  after  1 7  days.  Fifty- 
four  U.  quadrifasciata  adults  also  emerged  from  the  660  seed  heads,  with  speci- 
mens reared  from  8  of  the  12  sites.  On  9  occasions  these  flies  emerged  from  the 
same  seed  head  as  a  wasp  (Table  1 ). 

Table  1 .  Percentage  of  spotted  knapweed  seed  heads  from  which  Urophora  quadrifasci- 
ata and  Pteromalus  cardui  emerged  alone,  and  those  from  which  both  U.  quadrifasciata 
and  P.  cardui  emerged.  Seed  heads  were  collected  in  Houghton  County,  Michigan,  and 
insects  emerged  from  May  through  July  2002  after  overwintering. 


Site  (UTM 
Zone  16N) 

No.  of 
placed 

seed  heads 
in  rearing 

Urophora 
quadrifasciata 

Pteromalus 
cardui 

Both 

spp. 

1 

(382178, 

52 

19134) 

50 

0.0 

4.0 

0.0 

2 

(380817, 

52 

19287) 

52 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

3 

(380634, 

52 

19085) 

50 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

4 

(379830, 

52 

18685) 

25 

4.0 

8.0 

0.0 

5 

(379672, 

52 

19258) 

25 

12.0 

44.0 

4.0 

6 

(379990, 

52 

19550) 

78 

3.8 

6.4 

2.6 

1 

(380159, 

52 

10635) 

50 

0.0 

12.0 

0.0 

8 

(380549, 

52 

18850) 

55 

1.8 

0.0 

0.0 

9 

(380338, 

52 

18618) 

97 

9.3 

29.9 

1.0 

10 

(380338, 

52 

18618) 

20 

40.0 

30.0 

10.0 

1 

1 

(379739, 

52 

18616) 

49 

6.1 

20.4 

2.0 

1 

2 

(378375, 

5221202) 

109 

10.1 

11.9 

1.8 

Total  660  5.9  12.7  1.4 


276  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Of  seed  heads  that  yielded  at  least  one  P.  cardui,  the  mean  number  emerging 
was  1.26  (SE  =  0.07).  Of  seed  heads  that  yielded  at  least  one  U.  quadrifasciata, 
the  mean  number  emerging  was  1.13  (SE  =  0.06).  Thirty-five  percent  of  P.  car- 
dui adults  that  emerged  were  reared  from  seed  heads  with  one  or  more  other  adult 
P.  cardui.  Eleven  P.  cardui  adults  emerged  from  the  9  seed  heads  producing  both 
U.  quadrifasciata  and  wasps.  No  other  insects  emerged  from  seed  heads  from 
any  of  the  sites.  The  proportion  of  seed  heads  from  which  P.  cardui  emerged  at 
each  site  was  con-elated  with  the  proportion  of  seed  heads  from  which  U.  quadri- 
fasciata emerged  (r  =  0.7270;  p  <  0.01 ). 

The  fifty-four  U.  quadrifasciata  adults  emerged  resulted  in  0.08  viable  galls/ 
seed  head.  Though  Norwierski  et  al.  (1987)  described  acceptable  densities  of 
U.  quadrifasciata  larvae  as  0.5  gall/seed  head,  Harris  (1980b)  observed  only  0.1 
galls/seed  head  and  reported  a  ninety-five  percent  reduction  in  seed  production 
by  U.  quadrifasciata,  in  cooperation  with  U.  affinis.  This  reduction  in  seed  pro- 
duction is  based  on  the  assumption  that  each  spotted  knapweed  plant  produces 
an  average  of  416  seeds  (16  seed  heads/plant ,  x  26  seeds/seed  head)  (Watson  and 
Renney  1974).  A  large  number  of  seeds,  1300  to  1600  seeds/nr,  are  still  allowed 
to  enter  the  seed  bank  with  viability  of  up  to  eight  years  in  the  soil  (Harris  1980b, 
Davis  et  al.  1993).  In  areas  where  U.  affinis  and  U.  quadrifasciata  co-occur, 
U.  quadrifasciata  rapidly  becomes  the  dominant  species  in  knapweed  patches 
(Mays  and  Kok  2003). 

Even  with  U.  quadrifasciata  becoming  well  established,  including  areas  such 
as  the  Upper  Peninsula  of  Michigan  where  no  releases  have  been  made,  a  large 
number  of  seeds  are  not  being  destroyed  and  densities  of  spotted  knapweed  are 
not  being  reduced  (Lang  et  al.  1997).  Such  ineffectiveness  has  been  considered 
a  biological  control  failure  (Myers  2000).  The  limited  effectiveness  of  U.  quadri- 
fasciata in  reducing  spotted  knapweed  seed  production  may  be  decreased  further 
through  parasitism  by  P.  cardui. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The  authors  thank  James  A.  Bethke  (Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  California,  River- 
side, CA)  for  review  of  this  manuscript,  Eric  Grissell  (Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  Depart- 
ment of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  DC)  for  identification  of 
P.  cardui.  and  Janet  M.  Aerts,  Brian  L.  Beachy,  Devin  M.  Donaldson,  Elizabeth  E.  Graham,  and 
Justin  N.  Rosemier  for  field  and  laboratory  assistance. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

APHIS-PPQ.  2003.  Reviewer's  Manual  for  the  Technical  Advisory  Group  for  Biological  Control 
Agents  of  Weeds:  Guidelines  for  Evaluating  the  Safety  of  Candidate  Biological  Control  Agents. 
US  Department  of  Agriculture,  Marketing  and  Regulatory  Programs  02/2003-02  PPQ.  Washing- 
ton, D.C.  224  pp. 

Burkharclt,  B.  and  H.  Zwolfcr.  2002.  Macro-evolutionary  tradeoffs  in  the  tephiritid  genus  Uro- 
/>hora:  benefits  and  costs  of  an  improved  plant  gall.  Evolutionary  Ecology  Research  4:61-77. 

Davis,  E.  S.,  P.  K.  Fay,  T.  K.  Chicoine,  and  C.  A.  Lacey.  1993.  Persistence  of  spotted  knapweed 
(Centaurea  maculosa)  seed  in  soil.  Weed  Science  41:57-61. 


Vol.  11?.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 2T, 

D/hanokmen,  K.  A.  1987.  Pteromalidac.  pp.  88-41 1 .  In.  G.  S.  Medevedev  (Editor).  Keys  to  the  In- 
sects of  the  European  Part  of  the  USSR,  Vol.  Ill:  Hymenoptera,  Part  II.  Amerind  Publishing  Co. 
Pvt.  Ltd.  New  Delhi,  India.  1341  pp. 

D/hanokmen,  K.  A.  2001.  A  Review  of  pteromalid  wasps  of  the  genus  Pteromalus  Swederus 
(Hymenoptera,  Pteromalidae)  from  Kazakhstan:  II.  Entomological  Review  80:472-496. 

I)/ h  an  ok  me  M.  K.A.  and  E.E.  Grissell.  2003.  Nomenclatural  changes  in  Pteromalidae.  with  a  des- 
cription of  the  first  New  World  species  of  Ormocerus  Walker  (Hymenoptera:  Chalcidoidea).  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  105:535-541. 

Foote,  R.  H.,  F.  L.  Blanc,  and  A.  L.  Norrbom.  1 993.  Handbook  of  the  Fruit  Flies  (Diptera:  Tephri- 
tidae)  of  America  North  of  Mexico.  Cornell  University  Press,  Ithaca,  New  York.  571  pp. 

Graham,  M.  W.  R.  de  V.  1969.  The  Pteromalidae  of  northwestern  Europe  Hymenoptera:  Chal- 
cidoidea). Bulletin  of  the  British  Museum  (Natural  History),  Supplement  16:1-908. 

Harris,  P.  1980a.  Establishment  of  Urophora  affinis  Frfld.  and  U.  quadrifasciata  (Meig.)  (Diptera: 
Tephritidae)  in  Canada  for  the  biological  control  of  diffuse  and  spotted  knapweed.  Zeitschrift  fur 
Angewandte  Entomologie  89:504-514. 

Harris,  P.  1980b.  Effects  ofUrophom  affinis  Frfld.  and  U.  quadrifasciata  (Meig.)  (Diptera:  Tephri- 
tidae) on  Cenmwea  diffusa  Lam.  and  C.  maculosa  Lam.  (Compositae).  Zeitschrift  fur  Ange- 
wandte Entomologie  90:190-201. 

Harris,  P.  1986.  Biological  control  of  knapweed  with  Urophora  quadrifasciaia  Mg.,  Insects- 
Diseases-Pests,  Canadex  641.613.  Agriculture  Canada,  Ottawa.  2  pp. 

Harris,  P.  and  R.  Cranston.  1979.  An  economic  evaluation  of  control  methods  for  diffuse  and  spot- 
ted knapweed  in  western  Canada.  Canadian  Journal  of  Plant  Science  59:375-382. 

Kedzie-Webb,  S.  A.,  R.  L.  Sheley,  J.  J.  Borkowski,  and  J.  S.  Jacobs.  2001.  Relationships 
between  Centaiirea  maculosa  and  indigenous  plant  assemblages.  Western  North  American  Natur- 
alist 61 :43-49. 

Lacey,  J.  R.,  C.  B.  Marlow,  and  J.  R.  Lane.  1989.  Influence  of  spotted  knapweed  (Ccntaurca  mac- 
ulosa) on  surface  runoff  and  sediment  yield.  Weed  Technology  3:627-631. 

Lang,  R.  F.,  R.  D.  Richard,  and  R.  VV.  Hansen.  1997.  Urophora  affinis  and  U.  quadrifasciata 
(Diptera:  Tephritidae)  released  and  monitored  by  USDA,  APHIS.  PPO  as  biological  control 
agents  of  spotted  and  diffuse  knapweed.  The  Great  Lake  Entomologist  30:105-1 13. 

Mays,  W.  T.  and  L.  T.  Kok.  2003.  Population  dynamics  and  dispersal  of  two  exotic  biological  con- 
trol agents  of  spotted  knapweed,  Urophora  affinis  and  U.  quadrifasciata  (Diptera:  Tephritidae), 
in  southwestern  Virginia  from  1986  to  2000.  Biological  Control  27:43-52. 

Myers,  J.  H.  2000.  What  can  we  learn  from  biological  control  failures?  pp.  151-154.  In.  N.  R. 
Spencer  (Editor).  Proceedings  of  the  X  International  Symposium  on  Biological  Control  of  Weeds. 
976  pp. 

Myers,  J.  II.  and  P.  Harris.  1980.  Distribution  of  Urophora  galls  in  (lower  heads  of  diffuse  and 
spotted  knapweed  in  British  Columbia.  Journal  of  Applied  Ecology  17:359-367. 

Nornierski,  R.  M.,  J.  M.  Story,  and  R.  F..  Lund.  1987.  Two-level  numerical  sampling  plans  and 
optimal  subsample  si/e  computations  for  Urophora  affinis  and  Urophora  quadrifasciata 
(Diptera:  Tephritidae)  on  spotted  knapweed.  Environmental  Entomology  16:933-937. 

Olson,  B.  F.  and  R.  T.  Wallander.  2001.  Sheep  grazing  spotted  knapweed  and  Idaho  fescue. 
Journal  of  Range  Management  54:25-30. 

Pedigo,  L.  P.  1999.  Entomology  and  Pest  Management.  3rd  Edition.  Prentice-Hall  Inc.,  Upper 
Saddle  River,  New  Jersey.  691  pp. 

Speight,  M.  R.,  M.  D.  Hunter,  and  A.  D.  Watt.  1999.  Ecology  of  Insects:  Concepts  and  Applica- 
tions. Blackwcll  Science,  Oxford,  England.  350  pp. 


278  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Story,  J.  2002.  Spotted  Knapweed,  pp.  169-180.  //;,  R.  V.  Driesche,  B.  Blossey,  M.  Hoddle,  S. 
Lyon,  and  R.  Reardon  (Editors).  Biological  Control  of  Invasive  Plants  in  the  Eastern  United 
States.  US  Department  of  Agriculture,  Forest  Service,  Forest  Health  Technology  Enterprise  Team 
FHTET-2002-04.  413  pp. 

Story,  J.  M.,  K.  W.  Boggs,  W.  R.  Good,  L.  J.  White,  and  R.  M.  Nowierski.  1995.  Cause  and 
extent  of  predation  on  Urophora  spp.  larvae  (Diptera:  Tephritidae)  in  spotted  knapweed  capitula. 
Environmental  Entomology  24:1467-1472. 

Story,  J.  M.,  W.  R.  Good,  and  N.  W.  Callan.  1993.  Supercooling  capacity  of  Urophora  affinis  and 
U.  quadrifasciata  (Diptera:  Tephritidae),  two  flies  released  on  spotted  knapweed  in  Montana.  En- 
vironmental Entomology  22:831-836. 

Watson,  A.  and  A.  J.  Renney.  1974.  The  biology  of  Canadian  weeds.  6.  Centaurea  diffusa  and  C. 
macitlosa.  Canadian  Journal  of  Plant  Science  54:687-701. 

White,  I.  M.  and  V.  A.  Korneyev.  1989.  A  revision  of  the  western  Palaearctic  species  of  Urophora 
Robineau-Desvoidy  (Diptera:  Tephritidae).  Systematic  Entomology  14:327-374. 

Zar,  J.  H.  1999.  Biostatistical  analysis.  4th  edition.  Prentice-Hall  Inc.  Upper  Saddle  River,  New 
Jersey.  663  pp. 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 279 

TWO  NEW  SPECIES  OF  RHOPALOPSOLE 
(PLECOPTERA:  LEUCTRIDAE)  FROM  CHINA1 

Ding  Yang,1 '  VVeihai  Li,:  and  Fang  Zhir 

ABSTRACT:  Two  Chinese  stonefly  species  of  Rhopalopsole,  Rh.  Xui  sp.  n.  and  Rh.  shimentaiensis 
sp.  n.,  in  the  family  Leuctridae  are  described.  Their  relationships  with  the  related  species  are  dis- 
cussed. Their  diagnostic  characteristics  are  discussed  with  closely  related  congeners  and  their  habi- 
tat and  biological  data  are  provided. 

KEY  WORDS:  Rhopalopsole  shimentaiensis,  R.  xni,  new  species,  stoneflies,  Plecoptera,  Leuctridae, 
China 

The  genus  Rhopalopsole  is  characterized  by  the  short  subgenital  plate  of  ster- 
nite  9,  sclerotized  lateral  process  of  tergite  10,  and  long  cylindrical  cerci  in  male 
adults  (Zwick,  1977).  It  is  distributed  in  Asia  with  about  30  known  species. 
Seventeen  species  are  known  in  China  from  the  studies  of  Wu  (1949,  1973), 
Yang  D.  and  Yang  J.  (1991,  1993,  1995a-b),  Yang  J.  and  Yang  D.  (1991,  1994). 
In  the  present  paper,  two  species  of  Rhopalopsole  from  China  are  described  as 
new  to  science.  The  types  are  deposited  in  the  Entomological  Museum  of  China 
Agricultural  University  in  Beijing.  Morphological  terminology  generally  follows 
that  of  Zwick  (1977).  The  major  references  dealing  with  Rhopalopsole  are  as  fol- 
lows: Kawai,  1967;  Jewett,  1975;  Zhiltzova,  1975;  Harper,  1977;  Zwick,  1977. 


Rhopalopsole  shimentaiensis  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-5) 

Male:   Body  length  7.1-8.7  mm;  forewing  length  8.7-9.2  mm,  hindwing  length  7.2-7.5  mm. 

Head  dark  brown,  slightly  wider  than  prothorax;  antennae  brown;  mouthparts  dark  brown.  Thorax 
brown,  pronotum  dark  brown;  wings  more  or  less  brown;  legs  brown.  Abdomen  brown;  hypopygium 
including  cerci  dark  brown. 

Genitalia  (Figs.  1-5).  Tergite  9  weakly  scleroii/ed,  distinctly  wider  than  long,  its  posterior  margin 
weakly  incised,  with  one  small  sclerotized  mid-posterior  spine.  Sternite  9  basally  with  tonguelike 
vesicle  bearing  dense  hairs  and  slightly  longer  than  wide,  apically  with  distinct  subgenital  plate  wider 
than  long  and  rounded  apically.  Tergite  10  with  strongly  sclerotized  lateral  process  short  and  finger- 
like  in  lateral  view,  and  somewhat  acute  apically  in  dorsal  view;  three  separated  and  slightly  sclero- 
tized mid-anterior  sclerites,  of  which  two  lateral  ones  are  small  and  narrow  and  median  one  is  large 
and  broad;  one  pair  of  weakly  sclerotized  mid-posterior  sclerites  indistinctly  separated  from  the 
hemitergites.  Cercus  long  and  cylindrical,  apically  with  black  tiny  spine.  Epiproct  slightly  curved  for- 
ward, rather  wide  with  subtruncate  apical  margin.  Paraproct  somewhat  tapering  apically. 

Female:   Unknown. 

Type  Date:  Holotype  male,  paratype  1  male,  Guangdong,  Yingde,  Shimentai  National  Forest 
Park,  2003.  III.  28,  D.  Yang. 


1  Received  on  September  27,  2004.  Accepted  on  November  12.  2004. 

;  Department  of  Entomology,  China  Agricultural  University.  2  Yuanmingyuan  West  Road.  Beijing 
100094  China.  E-mail:  dyangcauf^  yahoo.coni.cn. 

1  Key  Lab  of  Insect  Evolution  &  Environmental  Changes,  Capital  Normal  University,  Beijing  100037 
China. 

Mailed  on  March  15,  2005 


280 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Etymology:  The  species  is  named  after  the  type  locality  Shimentai. 

Remarks:  The  new  species  is  somewhat  similar  to  R.  apicispina  Yang  and 
Yang  from  Hubei,  but  can  be  easily  distinguished  from  the  latter  by  the  9th  ter- 
gite  with  a  mid-posterior  spine,  lateral  process  of  the  10th  tergite  longer,  epiproct 
wide  with  truncate  tip,  and  cercus  with  tiny  apical  spine.  In  apicispina,  the  9th 
tergite  has  no  mid-posterior  spine,  the  lateral  process  of  the  10th  tergite  is  rather 
short,  the  epiproct  is  narrow  with  the  pointed  tip,  and  the  cercus  has  no  apical 
spine  (Yang,  D.  and  Yang,  J.,  1991 ).  This  species  is  collected  in  the  mountainous 
area  of  the  Shimentai  National  Forest  Park.  Adults  appear  in  the  early  spring. 


Figs.  1-5  Rhopalopsole  shimentaiensis  sp.  n.  (male)  1,  Genitalia,  lateral  view;  2,  geni- 
talia,  dorsal  view;  3,  genitalia,  ventral  view;  4,  epiproct,  posterior  view;  5,  paraproct,  ven- 
tral view. 


Rhopalopsole  xui  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  6-10) 

Male:   Body  length  8.5-10.2  mm;  forewing  length  10.5-12.8  mm,  hindwing  length  9.1-1 1.6  mm. 

Head  dark  brown,  slightly  wider  than  prothorax;  antennae  dark  brown;  mouthparts  dark  brown. 
Thorax  brown,  pronotum  dark  brown;  wings  more  or  less  brown;  legs  brown.  Abdomen  brown; 
hypopygium  including  cerci  dark  brown. 


Vol.  115,  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 


281 


Genitalia  (Figs.  6-10).  Tergite  9  weakly  sclerotized,  distinctly  wider  than  long,  its  posterior  mar- 
gin nearly  straight,  with  two  narrow  mid-posterior  transverse  stripes  distinctly  sclerotized.  Sternite  9 
basally  with  tonguelike  vesicle  bearing  dense  hairs  and  much  longer  than  wide,  apically  with  distinct 
subgenital  plate  wider  than  long  and  rounded  apically.  Tergite  10  with  strongly  sclerotized  lateral 
spine  rather  thick  basally  and  curved  backward  apically  in  lateral  view  and  nearly  straight  and  slight- 
ly directed  outward  apically  in  dorsal  view;  weakly  sclerotized  mid-anterior  sclerite  distinctly  wider 
than  long,  which  has  two  short  obtuse  lateral  processes  and  one  slightly  long  obtuse  median  process 
posteriorly;  one  pair  of  weakly  sclerotized  mid-posterior  sclerites.  Cercus  long  and  cylindrical,  api- 
cally without  tiny  spine.  Epiproct  with  thin  spinelike  apical  portion  curved  forward.  Paraproct  wide 
and  rounded  apically. 

Female.  Unknown. 

Holotype  male,  paratype  1  male,  Guangdong,  Ruyuan,  Nanling  National  Natural  Reserve,  2003. 
III.  25,  D'  Yang. 

Etymology:  The  species  is  named  after  Preofessor  Zaifu  Xu. 


10 


Figs.  6-10  Rhopalopsole  xui  sp.  n.  (male)  6,  Genitalia,  lateral  view;  7.  genitalia,  dorsal 
view;  8,  genitalia,  ventral  view;  9,  epiproct,  posterior  view;  10,  papraproct,  ventral  view. 


Remarks:  The  new  species  is  similar  to  R.  longispina  Yang  and  Yang  from 
Zhejiang  and  R.  aculeata  Harper  from  Nepal  in  having  the  9th  tergite  with  one 
pair  of  sclerotized  mid-posterior  stripes  and  thin  spinelike  epiproct,  but  can  be 
easily  distinguished  from  longispina  by  the  lateral  spine  of  the  10th  tergite  rather 
thick  and  curved  backward  apically,  median  process  of  mid-anterior  sclerite  of 
the  10th  tergite  obtuse  posteriorly,  and  paraproct  wide  and  rounded  apically.  In 
longispina,  the  lateral  spine  of  the  l()th  tergite  is  narrower  basally  and  curved 


282  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


upward  apically,  the  median  process  of  mid-anterior  sclerite  of  the  10th  tergite  is 
pointed  posteriorly,  and  the  subanal  lobe  has  the  acute  tip  (Yang,  C.  and  Yang, 
D.,  1991).  It  can  be  easily  separated  from  aculeata  by  the  lateral  spine  of  the  10th 
tergite  rather  thick  and  curved  backward  apically  in  lateral  view  and  nearly 
straight  and  directed  outward  in  dorsal  view,  mid-anterior  sclerite  of  the  10th  ter- 
gite divided  into  three  processes  posteriorly,  and  paraproct  rather  wide  and 
rounded  apically.  In  aculeata,  the  lateral  spine  of  the  10th  tergite  is  narrower 
basally  and  curved  upward  apically  in  lateral  view  and  distinctly  curved  and 
directed  inward  in  dorsal  view,  the  mid-anterior  sclerite  of  the  10th  tergite  is 
complete  posteriorly,  and  the  paraproct  is  rather  narrow  apically  (Harper,  1977). 
This  species  is  collected  in  the  mountainous  area  of  the  Nanling  National  Nature 
Reserve.  Adults  appear  in  the  early  spring. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

Our  sincere  thanks  are  due  to  Professor  Zaifu  Xu,  South  China  Agricultural  University,  Guang- 
dong, for  his  kind  help  in  many  ways  during  the  survey  to  Guangdong  in  2003.  The  research  was  sup- 
ported by  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (No.  30225009). 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Harper,  P.  P.   1977.  Capniidae,  Leuctridae,  and  Perlidae  (Plecoptera)  from  Nepal.  Oriental  Insects 
11(1):  53-62. 

Jewett,  S.  G.  Jr.    1975.  Some  stoneflies  from  Bangladesh,  India  and  Southeast  Asia.  Oriental  Insects 
9(2):  127-134. 

Kawai,  T.    1967.  Plecoptera  (Insecta).  Fauna  Japonica.  Biogeographical  Society  of  Japan  pp.  1-211. 

Yang,  D.  and  Yang,  J.   1991.  New  species  of  Plecoptera  from  Hubei.  Journal  of  Hubei  University 
(Natural  Science)  13(4):  369-372. 

Yang,  D.  and  Yang,  J.    1993.  New  and  little-known  species  of  Plecoptera  from  Guizhou  Province 
(III).  Entomotaxonomia  15(4):  235-238. 

Yang,  D.  and  Yang,  J.    1995a.  Plecoptera:  Leuctridae.  pp  20-24.  ///,  Zhu,  T.  (Editor).  Insects  and 
macrofungi  of  Gutianshan.  Zhejiang.  Zhejiang  Scientech  Press.  Hangzhou,  China.  327  pp. 

Yang,  D.  and  Yang,  J.   I995b.  Plecoptera:  Leuctridae.  pp  61-62.  //;.  Wu,  H.  (Editor).  Insects  of 
Baishanzu  Mountain,  Eastern  China.  China  Forestry  Publishing  House.  Beijing,  China.  586  pp. 

Yang,  J.  and  Yang,  D.    1991 .  One  new  species  of  Rhopa lopsolc  from  Zhejiang.  Journal  of  Zhejiang 
Forestry  College  8(  1 ):  78-19. 

Yang,  J.  and  Yang,  D.   1994.  Two  new  species  of  Rhopalopsole  (Plecoptera:  Leuctridae)  from 
Shaanxi.  Entomotaxonomia  16(3):  189-191. 

Wu,  C.  F.    1949.  Sixth  supplement  to  the  stoneflies  of  China  (Order  Plecoptera).  Peking  Natural 
History  Bulletin  17(4):  251-256. 

Wu,  C.  F.   1973.  New  species  of  Chinese  stoneflies  (Order  Plecoptera).  Acta  Entomologica  Sinica 
16(2):  97-1 IX. 

Zhilt/ova,  L.  A.   1975.  Rho/M/o/Kolc.  a  genus  of  Plecoptera  new  for  the  USSR  (Plec.,  Leuctridae). 
Zoologicheskii  Zhumal  54(2):  221-230. 

Zwick,  P.    1977.  Ergebnisse  der  Bhutan-Expedition  1972  der  Naturhistorischcn  Museums  in  Basal. 
Entomologica  Basiliensia  2:  85-134. 


Vol.  115.  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 283 

FURTHER  RECORDS  OF  PHLEBOTOMID  SANDFLIES 

(DIPTERA:  PHLEBOTOMIDAE) 

FROM  CAMPECHE,  MEXICO1 

E.  A.  Rebollar-TeMez,2  P.  C.  Manrique-Saide,1  E.  Tun-Ku,3  A.  Che-Mendoza,' 

and  F.  A.  Dzul-Manzanilla1 

ABSTRACT:  Leishmania  mexicana  is  endemic  in  southern  Mexico,  vectors  of  this  parasite  are  phle- 
botomid  sandflies.  As  part  of  entomological  surveys  carried  out  in  the  state  of  Campeche,  we  col- 
lected sandflies  from  different  sites.  A  total  of  16  species  in  two  genera  were  recorded.  Most  of  the 
species  had  been  recorded  previously  in  the  state  of  Campeche,  although  in  different  counties.  Two 
species;  L.  longipalpis  and  L.  ylephiletor  are  recorded  for  the  first  time  in  Campeche,  whilst  L.  undu- 
lata  is  confirmed  to  occur  in  Campeche. 

KEY  WORDS:  Phlebotomidae.  Phlebotominae,  Diptera,  Campeche,  Mexico,  leishmaniasis 

Phlebotomine  sandflies  are  the  vectors  of  Leishmania  parasites  causing 
human  leishmaniases  (Killick-Kendrick,  1999).  Cutaneous  leishmaniasis  (CL)  in 
southern  Mexico  is  endemic  and  it  is  chiefly  due  to  L.  mexicana  (Biagi).  The 
state  of  Campeche  is  known  to  be  an  endemic  area  of  CL  (Rebollar-Tellez  et  al., 
1996b).  Knowledge  of  sandfly  fauna  is  therefore  an  important  component  for  un- 
derstanding parasite  transmission  in  Campeche.  Field  studies  on  sandflies  in 
Campeche  have  been  conducted  by  several  authors  (e.g.  Biagi  and  de  Biagi, 
1953,  Rebollar-Tellez  et  al.,  1996b,  c  and  d).  In  spite  of  the  importance  of  trans- 
mission of  L.  mexicana  in  Campeche,  during  the  last  five  years  no  field  studies 
nor  collections  of  sandflies  had  been  undertaken  in  this  state.  The  present  paper 
documents  recent  collections  of  phlebotomine  sandflies  in  several  foci  of  Cam- 
peche and  compares  them  to  the  previous  records  of  sandfly  species  in  Mexico 
and  Campeche. 

METHODS 

Collection  of  sandflies  was  conducted  in  several  occasions  from  March  2001 
to  March  2002.  Catches  were  carried  out  in  five  locations  ("ejidos")  of  the  state 
of  Campeche.  Locations  were  situated  in  La  Libertad,  (N  18°31.60'  W  90°27.89') 
Escarcega,  Dzibalche,  (N  20°  19. 23'  W  90°  13. 41')  Calkini,  "20  de  Noviembre" 
(no  coordinates  available)  Dos  Naciones  (N  17°58.40'  W  89°20.74'),  and  La 
Guadalupe  (N  18°20.24',  W  89°28.49')  Calakmul.  Trapping  methods  included 


'  Received  on  April  23,  2004.  Accepted  on  October  15,  2004. 

2Centro  de  Investigaciones  Regionales  "Dr.  Hideyo  Noguchi,"  Universidad  Autonoma  de  Yucatan, 
Avenida  Itzaes  490,  Merida,  Yucatan  9700,  Republica  de  Mexico.  Fax:  52  (999)  923  6120.  E-mail: 
rebollar@tunku.uady.mx. 

1  Departamento  de  Zoologia,  Campus  de  Ciencias  Biologicas  y  Agropecuarias.  Universidad  Auto- 
noma de  Yucatan,  Apartado  Postal  4-1 16.  It/imna,  Merida.  Yucatan  97100.  Republica  de  Mexico. 
E-mails:  Pablo.Manrique-Saidetolshtm.ac.uk;  etunk@espm.insp.mx;  achemfa  espm.insp.mx;  and 
fdzul(«  •espm.insp.mx. 

Mailed  on  March  15,  2005 


284  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Shannon  traps  (for  anthtropophilic  species),  light  CDC  traps,  Disney  traps  (for 
rodentophilic  species),  funnel  traps  set  at  animal  burrows,  as  well  as  manual  cap- 
tures on  human  bait  and  into  tree  holes.  Unless  otherwise  stated,  for  each  collec- 
tion, the  trapping  method  is  indicated  as  Shannon,  CDC,  Disney,  or  funnel.  Trap- 
ping effort  was  unequal  in  each  location  concerning  the  kind  of  used  traps  and 
days  of  collecting.  Traps  (except  Shannon  trap)  were  set  before  dusk  and  were 
collected  at  dawn.  Sandflies  were  preserved  in  8  ml  glass  vials  containing  70  per- 
cent ethanol.  Later  in  the  laboratory,  flies  were  cleared  with  a  solution  of  20  per- 
cent NaOH,  then  they  were  placed  onto  glass  microscope  slides  and  mounted  in 
either  Berlese  fluid  (Entomopraxis  S.  C.,  Barcelona,  Spain)  or  DPX  (Watkins  and 
Doncaster,  The  Naturalists,  Kent,  England).  Flies  were  identified  under  a  light 
binocular  microscope  using  the  keys  of  Young  (1979)  and  Young  and  Duncan 
(1994).  Voucher  specimens  have  been  kept  in  the  entomological  collection  of  the 
Universidad  Autonoma  de  Yucatan  with  some  duplicates  deposited  at  the  ento- 
mological collection  at  the  Centre  for  Applied  Entomology  and  Parasitology, 
School  of  Life  Sciences,  Keele  University  (Staffordshire,  England). 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

A  total  of  16  species  in  two  genera  were  recorded  in  this  survey.  Dos  Naciones 
was  the  location  with  the  highest  number  of  species  (n=  15)  followed  by  La 
Guadalupe  (n=  8),  however,  this  figure  should  be  taken  with  caution  as  it  may  be 
due  to  the  more  frequent  catches  (trapping  effort)  of  sandflies  in  these  two  sites. 
The  species  composition  for  each  location  is  listed  in  Table  1 . 

Brumptomyia  hamata  (Fairchild  and  Hertig,  1947) 

Material  Examined:  49-  12  CF.  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  18  Oct  2001  (2  Cf  CDC), 
21  Nov  2001  (1  9  Shannon,  1  Cf  CDC),  19  Jan  2002  (2  Cf  CDC),  21  Jan  2002  (2  Cf  CDC),  La 
Libertad,  Escarcega,  02  Nov  2001  ( 1  Cf  CDC),  04  Nov  2001  (3  9  funnel  trap,  4  Cf  tree  hole). 

This  is  the  first  record  of  the  species  for  the  county  of  Calakmul.  This  species 
had  previously  been  reported  in  Escarcega,  Campeche  by  Navarro-Correa  (1995) 
and  Rebollar-Tellez  et  al.  (1996a). 

Brumptomyia  galindoi  (Fairchild  and  Hertig,  1947) 

Material  Examined:  17  9,  81  Cf.  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  17  Oct  2001  (3  9,  10  rf 
CDC),  18  Oct  2001  (4  9,  9  Cf  funnel,  3  9,  21  Cf  CDC).  21  Nov  2001  (2  9  CDC),  22  Nov  2001  (2 
9,  2  Cf  CDC),  23  Nov  2001  ( 1  9,  1 1  CDC),  18  Jan  2002  ( 1  9,  9  Cf  CDC),  19  Jan  2002  (2  9.  4  Cf 
CDC),  20  Jan  2002  ( I  9,  2  Cf  CDC),  21  Jan  2002  (3  Cf  CDC),  20  de  Noviembre,  Calakmul,  22  Mar 
2001  (2  Cf  Shannon),  La  Libertad,  Escarcega,  02  Nov  2001  (1  Cf  CDC),  04  Nov  2001  (1  Cf  funnel, 
4  Cf  tree  hole). 

This  species  had  previously  been  reported  by  Navarro-Correa  (1995)  and 
Rebollar-Tellez  et  al.  (1996a)  in  the  county  of  Escarcega.  This  is  the  first  report 
in  the  county  of  Calakmul.  Ibanez-Bemal  ( 1999)  refers  this  species  as  B.  mesai 
Sherlock  on  the  basis  of  a  shorter  wing  length  to  that  which  was  given  by 
Fairchild  and  Hertig  (1947)  in  their  original  description.  In  addition,  Ibanez- 


Vol.  115,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 


285 


Table  1.  Known  distribution  of  sand  fly  species  in  five  sites  of  the  counties  of  Calkini, 
Calakmul,  and  Escarcega,  all  located  in  the  State  of  Campeche,  Mexico.  Site  1  =  Dos 
Naciones,  Site  2  =  La  Guadalupe,  Site  3  =  20  de  Noviembre,  Site  4  =  Dzibalche,  and  Site 
5  =  La  Libertad. 


Species 

Site  1 

Site  2 

Site  3 

Site  4 

Site  5 

Brumptomyici  hamata 

19  79 

39  5Cf 

B.  galindoi 

17973CT 

2d" 

6Cf 

Lutzomyia  cniciata 

20193C? 

608C? 

5Gf 

id1 

70O" 

L.  longipalpis 

39 

L.  gomezi 

39 

L.  ovallesi 

3239  3d" 

149 

719  id" 

39 

L.  serrana 

29 

L.  deleoni 

929  2Gf 

69 

292CT 

419  8Cf 

L.  permira 

Id" 

3d1 

L.  shannoni 

1409  37Cf 

439  id" 

19 

19 

269  8Cf 

L.  wuhdata 

39 

id1 

L.  carpenteri 

54931CT 

L.  olmeca  olmeca 

1609  Id" 

8393CT 

69  120" 

19 

1089 

L.  ylephiletor 

259  Id1 

- 

L.  panamensis 

3459  92Cf 

559  5Cf 

19  Id1 

195CT 

L.  trinidadensis 

3195CT 

Bernal  (1999)  points  out  that  the  Mexican  specimens  never  possess  seven  or 
eight  spines  in  the  inner  side  of  the  gonocoxite.  In  this  paper,  we  decided  to  adopt 
a  more  conservative  position  in  regard  of  Ibanez-Bernal  ( 1999)  resurrection  of  B. 
mesai.  We  propose  to  maintain  the  name  B.  galindoi  for  the  Mexican  specimens 
until  new  and  stronger  evidence  becomes  available  to  consider  B.  galindoi  and 
B.  mesai  as  distinct  species. 

Lutzomyia  (Lutzomyia)  cniciata  (Coquillctt,  1907) 

Material  Examined:  SS5  9-  3  cf.  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  17  Oct  2001  ( 1  9  tree 
hole),  18  Oct  2001  (149  Shannon.  I  9  CDC),  21  Nov  2001  (56  9  Shannon.  2  9  CDC),  22  Nov  2001 
(179  Shannon),  23  Nov  2001  (139  Shannon).  24  Nov  2001  ( 10  9  Shannon.  1  9  CDC),  IS  Jan  2002 
(9  9  Shannon),  19  Jan  2002  (3  9  Shannon.  2  9  light  CDC),  20  Jan  2002  (4  9  Shannon).  21  Jan  2002 
(5  9  Shannon,  2  cf  CDC),  22  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  24  Jan  2002  (2  9  Shannon),  25  Jan  2002 
(5  9  Shannon),  26  Jan  2002  (4  9  Shannon).  25  Mar  2002  (6  9  Shannon),  26  Mar  2002  (14  9 
Shannon),  27  Mar  2002  (5  9  Shannon),  28  Mar  2002  (179  Shannon),  29  Mar  2002  (X  9  Shannon). 


286  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


30  Mar  2002  (1  9,  1  cf  Shannon).  La  Guadalupe,  Calakmul,  21  Oct  2001  (1  9  CDC),  22  Oct  2001 
(56  9  Shannon),  6  Dec  2001  (60  9  Shannon,  1 1  9  CDC),  7  Dec  2001  (26  9  Shannon),  8  Dec  2001 
(51  9  Shannon),  9  Dec  2001  (26  9  Shannon),  10  Dec  2001  (22  9  Shannon),  11  Dec  2001  (50  9 
Shannon),  12  Dec  2001  (136  9  Shannon),  13  Dec  2001  (32  9  Shannon),  14  Dec  2001  (104  9 
Shannon),  17  Feb  2002  (1  9  Shannon),  18  Feb  2002  (3  9  Shannon),  19  Feb  2002  (5  9  Shannon),  20 
Feb  2002  (5  9  Shannon),  21  Feb  2002  (139  Shannon),  24  Feb  2002  (5  9  Shannon),  25  Feb  2002  (1 
9  Shannon).  20  Noviembre,  Calakmul,  22  Mar  2001  (5  9  Shannon),  Dzibalche,  Calkini,  06  Jul  2001 
(1  9,  human  bait).  La  Libertad,  Escarcega,  01  Nov  2001  (44  9  Shannon),  02  Nov  2001  (13  9  Shan- 
non, 1  9  CDC,  1  9  human  bait),  03  Nov  2001  ( 1  9  Shannon,  1  9  CDC),  04  Nov  2001  (9  9  Shannon). 

This  is  the  first  record  in  the  counties  of  Calkini  and  Calakmul.  Lutzomyia  crit- 
ciata  is  also  known  for  the  states  of  Quintana  Roo  (Cruz-Ruiz  et  al.  1994)  and 
Yucatan  (Rebollar-Tellez  and  Manrique-Saide,  2001).  Ibanez-Bernal  (1999) 
reports  this  species  as  the  most  widely  distributed  species  in  Mexico,  occurring 
in  16  states  in  Mexico.  Currently,  L.  cruciata  continues  to  be  one  of  the  suspect- 
ed vectors  of  Le.  mexicana  in  the  Yucatan  Peninsula  and  probably  in  other  areas 
of  Mexico. 

Lutzomyia  (Lutzomyia)  longipalpis  (Lutz  and  Neiva,  1912) 

Material  Examined:  3  9-  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones.  Calakmul,  28  Mar  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  29 
Mar  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  30  Mar  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon). 

This  is  the  first  report  of  L.  longipalpis  for  the  state  of  Campeche.  In  the 
Yucatan  Peninsula,  it  has  been  reported  in  the  neighboring  states  of  Yucatan  and 
Quintana  Roo  (Ibanez-Bernal,  1999  for  references).  Lutzomyia  longipalpis  is  the 
main  vector  of  Le.  infantum  in  the  New  World.  Recent  evidence  shows  that  L. 
longipalpis  is  a  species  complex  of  at  least  three  different  members  based  on  the 
stereochemistry  of  the  male-sex  pheromone  (Hamilton  et  al.  1996).  No  Mexican 
specimens  have  hitherto  been  analyzed  to  compare  the  sex  pheromone  profiles. 

Lutzomyia  (Lutzomyia)  gomezi  (Nitzulescu,  1931) 

Material  Examined:  3  9-  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  18  Jan  2002  (1  9  Shannon),  20 
Jan  2002  (1  9  Shannon),  26  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon). 

Ibanez-Bernal  (1999)  reports  this  species  from  the  county  of  Escarcega  based 
on  the  works  of  Ramirez-Fraire  (1992)  and  Navarro-Correa  (1995).  However, 
none  of  these  authors  seems  to  have  deposited  their  specimens  in  an  entomolog- 
ical collection  for  further  comparison. 

Lutzomyia  ovallesi  (Ortiz,  1952) 

Material  Examined:  411  9-  4  cT.  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  18  Oct,  2001  (1189 
Shannon,  1  9  CDC),  21  Nov  2001  (54  9  Shannon),  22  Nov  2001  (16  9  Shannon),  23  Nov  2001  (6 
9  Shannon),  24  Nov  2001  (2  9  Shannon),  22  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  24  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon), 
25  Jan  2002  (1  9  Shannon),  25  Mar  2002  (10  9  Shannon),  26  Mar  2002  (10  9-  1  Cf  Shannon),  27 
Mar  2002  (2 1  9  Shannon),  28  Mar  2002  (46  9  Shannon),  29  Mar  2002  (2 1  9,  1  C?  Shannon),  30  Mar 
2002  (15  9,  1  Cf  Shannon).  La  Guadalupe,  Calakmul,  29  Apr  2001  (1  9  CDC),  22  Oct  2001  (2  9 
Shannon),  6  Dec  2001  (4  9  Shannon),  7  Dec  2001  ( 1  9  Shannon),  8  Dec  2001  ( 1  9  Shannon),  9  Dec 
2001  (1  9  Shannon),  20  Feb  2002  (1  9  Shannon),  21  Feb  2002  (3  9  Shannon),  20  de  Noviembre, 
Calakmul,  22  Mar  2001  (71  9,  1  Cf  Shannon),  La  Libertad,  Escarcega,  01  Nov  2001  (29  Shannon), 
02  Nov  2001  (I  9  Shannon). 


Vol.  115.  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 287 

This  is  the  first  report  of  Lutzomyia  ovallesi  for  the  county  of  Calakmul.  This 
species  has  been  reported  in  the  states  of  Quintana  Roo  (Ibanez-Bernal,  1999) 
and  Campeche  (Navarro-Correa,  1995).  The  later  author  reported  L.  ovallesi  in 
the  county  of  Escarcega  (no  specimens  available).  Lutzomyia  ovallesi  has  been 
found  infected  with  Le.  braziliensis  in  Guatemala  (Rowton  et  al.,  1992). 

Lutzomyia  serrana  (Damascene  and  Arouck,  1949) 

Material  Examined:  2  9.  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  18  Oct  2001  (1  9  CDC),  La 
Libertad,  Escarcega  02  Nov  2001  ( 1  9  Shannon). 

This  is  the  first  report  in  the  county  of  Calakmul.  This  species  has  been  pre- 
viously known  in  Chiapas  and  Nayarit  (Ibanez-Bernal,  1999).  Navarro-Correa 
(1995)  also  listed  this  species  in  Escarcega,  however  there  are  no  specimens 
available. 

Lutzomyia  (Coromyia)  deleoni  (Fairchild  and  Hertig,  1947) 

Material  Examined:  141  9,  12  cf.  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  17  Oct  2001  (2  9 
CDC),  18  Oct  2001  (5  9  Shannon,  30  9  CDC,  5  9  funnel),  22  Nov  2001  ( 1  9  Shannon,  7  9  CDC), 
23  Nov  2001  (2  9  Shannon,  6  9  CDC),  24  Nov  2001  (2  9  Shannon,  13  9  CDC),  18  Jan  2002  (4  9 
CDC),  19  Jan  2002  (2  Cf  Shannon,  6  9  CDC),  20  Jan  2002  (1  9  Shannon,  4  9  CDC),  21  Jan  2002 
(4  9  CDC).  La  Guadalupe,  Calakmul,  29  Apr  2001  ( 1  9  CDC),  6  Dec  2001  (4  9  CDC),  14  Dec  2001 
(1  9  Shannon),  20  de  Noviembre,  Calakmul,  22  Mar  2001  (29,  1  cf  Shannon),  28  Apr  2001  (1  Cf 
runnel),  La  Libertad,  Escarcega,  01  Nov  2001  (3  9  Shannon,  4  9  CDC),  02  Nov  01  (6  9  Shannon, 
4  9  CDC),  03  Nov  2001  (5  9,  1  cf  CDC),  04  Nov  2001  (2  9  Shannon,  4  9-  3  Cf  funnel,  13  9-  4  Cf 
tree  hole). 

This  is  the  first  report  of  L.  deleoni  for  the  county  of  Calakmul.  This  species 
had  previously  been  reported  in  the  county  of  Escarcega  by  Ramirez-Fraire 
(1992)  and  by  Navarro-Correa  (1995)  with  no  specimens  available  from  either  of 
their  reports.  Rebollar-Tellez  et  al.  (1996a)  also  reported  this  species  in  Escar- 
cega and  the  studied  material  remains  at  the  Entomological  Collection  of  the 
Universidad  Autonoma  de  Yucatan 

Lutzomyia  (Dampfomyia) permira  (Fairchild  and  Hertig,  1956) 

Material  Examined:  4  9  Campeche,  20  de  Noviembre,  28  Oct  2001  (3  Cf  funnel).  La  Guada- 
lupe, Calakmul,  21  Fob  2002  ( 1  Cf,  CDC). 

This  is  the  first  report  of  I.  permira  in  the  county  of  Calakmul.  The  specimen 
collected  in  La  Guadalupe  has  been  deposited  at  the  School  of  Life  Sciences, 
Keele  University. 

Lutzomyia  (Psathyromyia)  shannoni  (Dyar,  1929) 

Material  Examined:  2119,  ^  &•  Cainpeehe,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  17  Oct  2001  (3  9-  '  Cf 
Shannon,  1  9  1  Cf  CDC),  18  Oct  2001  (7  9.  3  Cf  Shannon),  21  Nov  2001  (42  9.  2  Cf  Shannon).  22 
Nov  2001  (d9.  I  Cf  Shannon.  I  Cf  CDC).  23  Nov  2001  (3  9  Shannon).  24  Nov  2001  (2  9  Shannon). 
18  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  CDC),  19  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  CDC),  21  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  25  Mar  2002  (3  9.  I 
Cf  Shannon),  26  Mar  2002  (21  9.  3  Cf  Shannon),  27  Mar  2002  (9  9,  3  Cf  Shannon).  28  Mar  2002  (30 
9.  17  Cf  Shannon),  29  Mar  2002  (2  9-  3  Cf  Shannon).  30  Mar  2002  (8  9-  '  Cf  Shannon).  La 
Guadalupe,  Calakmul,  22  Oct  2001  (2  9  Shannon),  6  Dec  2001  ( 1  9  Shannon,  1  9  CDC),  7  Dec  2001 


288  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


(7  9  Shannon),  8  Dec  2001  (5  9,  1  Cf  Shannon),  9  Dec  2001  (1  9  Shannon),  10  Dec  2001  (3  9 
Shannon),  11  Dec  2001  (4  9  Shannon),  12  Dec  2001  (5  9  Shannon),  13  Dec  2001  (1  9  Shannon), 
14  Dec  2001  (2  9  Shannon),  17  Feb  2002  (1  9  Shannon),  18  Feb  2002  (1  9  Shannon),  19  Feb  2002 
(2  9  Shannon),  21  Feb  2002  (2  9  Shannon),  23  Feb  02  ( 1  9  Shannon),  24  Feb  2002  (  1  9  Shannon), 
25  Feb  2002  (3  9  Shannon),  20  de  Noviembre,  Calakmul,  22  Mar  2001  ( 1  9  Shannon).  Dzibalche, 
Calkini  06  Jul  2001  ( 1  9  human  bait).  La  Libertad,  Escarcega,  01  Nov  2001  (8  9,  5  Cf  Shannon),  02 
Nov  2001  (7  9,  1  Cf  Shannon),  03  Nov  2001  (7  9  Shannon,  2  9,  1  Cf  CDC),  04  Nov  2001  (2  9,  1  Cf 
Shannon). 

This  is  the  first  report  of  Lutzomyia  (Dampfomyia)  permira  for  the  counties  of 
Calkini  and  Calakmul.  This  species  had  previously  been  reported  in  the  county 
of  Escarcega  by  Ramirez-Fraire  (1992),  Navarro-Correa  (1995)  and  Rebollar- 
Tellez  et  al.  (1996a).  According  to  Ibanez-Bernal  (2000)  the  actual  distribution 
of  L.  shannoni  may  be  much  greater  than  that  which  is  known  at  present.  Female 
L.  shannoni  are  antropophilic  and  may  act  as  secondary  vector  of  Le.  mexicana 
in  certain  areas. 

Lutzomyia  (Psathyromyia)  undulata  (Fairchild  and  Hertig,  1953) 

Material  Examined:  4  9-  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  28  Mar  2002  (3  9  Shannon),  La 
Guadalupe,  Calakmul,  21  Feb  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon). 

This  is  the  first  report  L.  undulata  for  the  county  of  Calakmul.  L.  undulata  had 
been  reported  in  the  county  of  Escarcega  by  Navarro-Correa  (1995),  although  to 
the  best  of  our  knowledge  there  are  no  specimens  available. 

Lutzomyia  carpenteri  (Fairchild  and  Hertig,  1959) 

Material  Examined:  54  9,  31  cf.  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  17  Oct  2001  (4  9  CDC), 
18Oct2001  (2  9,  3  Cf  CDC),  22  Nov  2001  (1  9  CDC),  24  Nov  2001  (1  9  CDC),  18  Jan  2002  (11 
9  10  CT  CDC),  19  Jan  2002  (21  9,  5  Cf  CDC),  20  Jan  2002  (9  9,  7  cf  CDC).  21  Jan  2002  (4  9,  6  tf 
CDC),  29  Mar  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon). 

According  to  Ibaiiez-Bernal  (2000)  L.  carpenteri  is  at  present  known  to  occur 
in  the  states  of  Campeche,  and  Quintana  Roo,  but  he  does  not  quote  the  records 
of  Ramirez-Fraire  (1992),  Navarro-Correa  (1995)  and  Rebollar-Tellez  et  al. 
(1996a)  from  Escarcega. 

Lutzomyia  (Nyssomyia)  olmeca  olmeca  (Vargas  and  Diaz-Najera,  1959) 

Material  Examined:  35S  9-  16  Cf.  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  17  Oct  2001  (4  9 
Shannon).  18  Oct  2001  (8  9  Shannon,  3  9  CDC),  21  Nov  2001  (23  9  Shannon.  1  9  CDC).  22  Nov 

2001  (II  9,  Shannon.  13  9  CDC),  23  Nov  2001  (9  9  Shannon,  10  9  CDC),  24  Nov  2001  (17  9 
Shannon,  4  9,  1  cf  CDC),  18  Jan  2002  (5  9  Shannon),  19  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  20  Jan  2002  (6 
9  Shannon,  2  9  CDC),  21  Jan  2002  (7  9  Shannon.  1  9  CDC),  23  Jan  2002  (3  9  Shannon),  24  Jan 

2002  (7  9  Shannon),  25  Jan  2002  (6  9  Shannon),  26  Jan  2002  (6  9  Shannon),  25  Mar  2002  (3  9 
Shannon),  26  Mar  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  27  Mar  2002  (4  9  Shannon),  28  Mar  2002  (4  9  Shannon), 
29  Mar  2002(1  9  Shannon).  La  Guadalupe,  Calakmul,  21  Oct  2001  (4  9  Shannon),  22  Oct  2001  (1 
9  CDC),  06  Dec  2001  (4  9  Shannon,  2  9,  2  Cf  CDC),  07  Dec  2001  (6  9  Shannon).  08  Dec  2001  (4 
9  Shannon),  09  Dec  2001  (4  9  Shannon),  1 1  Dec  2001  (6  9  Shannon),  12  Dec  2001  ( 1  9  Shannon), 
13  Dec  2001  (5  9  Shannon),  14  Dec  2001  (5  9  Shannon),  17  Feb  2002  (3  9  Shannon),  18  Feb  2002 
(3  9  Shannon),  19  Feb  2002  (8  9  Shannon),  20  Feb  2002  (5  9  Shannon).  21  Feb  2002  (7  9  Shannon), 
22  Feb  2002  (4  9  Shannon),  23  Feb  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  25  Feb  2002  ( 10  9,  1  d"  Shannon).  20  de 
Noviembre,  Calakmul,  22  Mar  2002  (69,  12  Cf  Shannon).  Dzibalche,  Calkini  06  Jul  2001  (I  9 


Vol.  115.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 289 

human  bait).  La  Libertad,  Escarcega,  01  Nov  2001  (199  Shannon),  02  Nov  2001  (42  9  Shannon), 
03  Nov  2001  (9  9  Shannon,  10  9  CDC),  04  Nov  2001  (28  9  Shannon). 

In  this  paper,  we  report  for  the  first  time  L.  olmeca  olmeca  for  the  counties  of 
Calkini  and  Calakmul.  Lutzomyia  (Nyssomyia)  olmeca  olmeca  is  currently  the 
proven  vector  of  L.  mexicana  in  the  Yucatan  Peninsula,  Mexico  (Biagi  et  al., 
1965).  In  Ibanez-Bernal  (2000),  L.  olmeca  olmeca  is  listed  for  the  Mexican  states 
of  Chiapas,  Oaxaca,  Quintana  Roo,  Veracruz,  and  Tabasco.  However,  in  Ibanez- 
Bernal  (2000b)  L.  olmeca  olmeca  is  listed  also  for  the  state  of  Campeche.  In 
addition,  L.  olmeca  olmeca  had  been  reported  in  the  county  of  Escarcega,  Cam- 
peche by  Ramirez-Fraire  (1992),  Navarro-Correa  (1995)  and  Rebollar-Tellez  et 
al.  (1996a). 

Lutzomyia  (Nyssomyia)  ylephiletor  (Fairlchild  and  Hertig,  1952) 

Material  Examined:  25  9-  '  Cf .  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  26  Mar  2002  ( 14  9.  1  cf 
Shannon),  27  Mar  2002  (4  9  Shannon),  28  Mar  2002  (7  9  Shannon). 

This  is  the  first  report  of  L.  ylephiletor  for  the  state  of  Campeche.  This  species 
is  also  known  in  the  states  of  Chiapas  and  Tabasco  (Ibanez-Bernal,  2002).  Female 
L.  ylephiletor  have  been  associated  with  transmission  of  Le.  braziliemis  in  the 
neighboring  country  of  Guatemala  (Porter  et  al.,  1987;  Rowton,  et  al.,  1991). 

Lutzomyia  (Psychodopygus)  panamensis  (Shannon,  1926) 

Material  Examined:  402  9.  103  Cf.  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones,  Calakmul,  17  Oct  2001  (21  9,  2 
Cf,  Shannon.  2  9.  1  cf  CDC),  18  Oct  2001  (25  9,  13  Cf  Shannon,  12  9,  13  cf  CDC),  21  Nov  2001 
(101  9,  1  Cf  Shannon,  1  9,  1  Cf  CDC),  22  Nov  2001  (17  9,  6  Cf  Shannon,  5  9-  4  Cf  CDC),  23  Nov 

2001  (53  9,  16  Cf  Shannon.  2  9,  10  Cf  CDC),  24  Nov  2001  (6  9.  4  Cf  Shannon),  18  Jan  2002  (4  9. 
3  Cf  Shannon.  1  9  CDC),  19  Jan  2002  (6  9,  7  Cf  Shannon,  1  9  CDC),  20  Jan  2002  (12  9,  2  Cf 
Shannon).  21  Jan  2002  ( 10  9.  4  cf  Shannon,  1  9  CDC),  22  Jan  2002  (5  9,  1  Cf  Shannon).  23  Jan 

2002  (4  9  Shannon),  24  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  25  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  26  Jan  2002  (169-  ' 
9  Shannon),  25  Mar  2002  ( 1  9  Shannon),  26  Mar  2002  (6  9.  1  cf  Shannon),  27  Mar  2002  (4  9  Shan- 
non), 28  Mar  2002  (3  9.  1  cf  Shannon),  29  Mar  2002  (3  9  Shannon),  30  Mar  02  ( 1  9  Shannon),  La 
Guadalupe,  Calakmul,  22  Oct  2001  (23  9,  5  Cf  Shannon),  6  Dec  2001  (2  9  Shannon,  1  cf  CDC),  7 
Dec  2001  (6  9  Shannon).  8  Dec  2001  (6  9  Shannon),  9  Dec  2001  (2  9  Shannon).  10  Dec  2001  (3  9 
Shannon).  1 1  Dec  2001  (2  9  Shannon).  12  Dec  2001  (4  9  Shannon),  13  Dec  2001  (3  9  Shannon), 
14  Dec  2001  (I   9  Shannon),  19  Feb  2002  (1  9  Shannon).  21   Feb  2002  (1  9  Shannon).  20  de 
Noviembre,  Calakmul.  22  Mar  2001  ( 1  9-  I  Cf  Shannon).  La  Libertad,  Escarcega,  01  Nov  2001  (1 
9,  1  Cf  Shannon.  1  Cf  CDC),  02  Nov  2001  (2  Cf  Shannon,  1  Cf  CDC). 

This  is  the  first  record  of  L.  panamensis  in  the  county  of  Calakmul.  This 
species  had  also  been  reported  in  the  county  of  Escarcega  and  in  the  state  of 
Quintana  Roo  (Ibanez-Bernal,  2000b).  Female  L.  panamensis  have  been  found 
naturally  infected  with  flagellates  (probably  L.  braziliensis)  in  Tikal,  Guatemala 
(Rowton  et  al.,  1991). 

Lutzomyia  trinidadensis  (Nevvstead,  1922) 

Material  Examined:  31  9-  -s  Cf.  Campeche,  Dos  Naciones.  Calakmul,  IS  Oct  2001.  (  I  9  s'^'i- 
non,  3  9,  1  Cf  CDC),  21  Nov  2001  (4  9  Shannon).  23  Nov  2001  (9  9  CDC),  24  No\  2001  ( I  9  Shan- 
non, 1  9  CDC),  18  Jan  2002  (1  9,  2  Cf  CDC).  19  Jan  2002  (3  9  CDC),  20  Jan  2002  ( 1  9  CDC),  21 
Jan  2002  (6  9.  1  Cf  CDC),  26  Mar  2002  ( I  9  Shannon),  28  Mar  2002  ( 1  Cf  Shannon). 


290  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


In  this  study  L.  trinidadensis  is  reported  for  the  first  time  to  the  county  of 
Calakmul.  L.  trinidadensis  had  previously  been  found  in  the  county  of  Escarcega 
by  Navarro-Correa  (1992  This  species  is  also  known  in  the  states  of  Chiapas  and 
Yucatan  (Ibanez-Bernal,  2000b),  Guerrero  and  Morelos  (Ortega-Gutierrez,  1966). 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  are  grateful  to  the  inhabitants  of  the  study  sites  for  their  hospitality  during  our  field  trips.  The 
senior  writer  wishes  to  thank  M.D.  Abelaido  Chinas  for  his  kind  support  throughout  the  study.  This 
investigation  received  financial  support  from  the  UNDP/World  Bank/WHO  Special  Programme  for 
Research  and  Training  in  Tropical  Diseases  (TDR)  ID  A00732. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Biagi,  F.  and  A.  M.  de  Biagi.  1953.  Datos  ecologicos  de  algunos  flebotomus  mexicanos  (Diptera, 
Psych.)  Anales  del  Institute  de  Biologia  de  Mexico.  24:  445-450. 

Biagi,  F.,  A.  M.  de  Biagi,  and  F.  H.  Beltran.  1966.  Actividad  horaria  de  Phlebotomus  antropofilos 
en  la  Peninsula  de  Yucatan.  Revista  del  Institute  de  Salubridad  y  Enfermedades  Tropicales  de 
Mexico.  26:  73-77. 

Cruz-Ruiz,  A.  L.,  J.  Garcia-Rejon,  P.  Manrique-Saide,  and  J.  Perez-Motul.  1994.  Taxonomical 
identification  of  anthropophilic  species  of  Lutzomyiu  in  Quintana  Roo  Peninsula  of  Yucatan, 
Mexico.  Revista  Biomedica.  5:  127-131. 

Fairchild,  G.  B.  and  M.  Hertig.  1947.  Notes  on  the  Phlebotomus  of  Panama  (Diptera:  Psychodidae). 
Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  40:  610-616. 

Hamilton,  J.  G.  C.,  R.  D.  Ward,  M.  J.  Dougherty,  R.  Maingon,  C.  Ponce,  E.  Ponce,  H.  Noyes, 
and  R.  Zeledon,  R.  1996.  Comparison  of  the  sex-pheromonc  components  of  Lutzomyia  longi- 
pulpis  (Diptera:  Psychodidae)  from  areas  of  visceral  and  atypical  cutaneous  leishmaniasis  in 
Honduras  and  Costa  Rica.  Annals  of  Tropical  Medicine  and  Parasitology  5:  533-541. 

Ibanez-Bernal,  S.  1999.  Phlebotominae  (Diptera:  Psychodidae)  de  Mexico  I.-  Bnnnptomyia  Franca 
y  Parrot;  Lutzomyia  Franca,  las  especies  del  L.  (Lutzomyia)  Franca  y  del  grupo  vemtcarum.  Folia 
Entomologica  Mexicana  107:  61-116. 

Ibanez-Bernal,  S.  2000a.  Psychodidae  (Diptera).  In,  J.,  Llorente-Bousquets,  E.  Gonzalez-Soriano, 
and  N.  Papavero,  (Editors)  pp.  607-626.  Biodiversidad,  taxonomia  y  biogeografia  de  artropodos 
de  Mexico:  hacia  una  sintesis  de  su  conocimiento.  Universidad  Nacional  Autonoma  de  Mexico. 
Volumen  II.  Mexico,  Distrito  Federal.  676  pp. 

Ibanez-Bernal,  S.  2000b.  Los  Phlebotominae  (Diptera:  Psychodidae)  de  Mexico.  Tesis  Doctoral 
(Institute  de  Biologia).  Universidad  Nacional  Autonoma  de  Mexico  (Mexico,  Distrito  Federal). 
291  pp. 

Ibanez-Bernal,  S.  2001.  Phlebotominae  (Diptera:  Psychodidae)  de  Mexico  II.  Las  especies  de 
Lutzomyiu  (Coromyia)  Barreto,  del  grupo  Dclpozoi  y  de  Lutzomvia  (Dampfomyia)  Addis.  Folia 
Entomologica  Mexicana  40:  17-43. 

Ibanez-Bernal,  S.  2002.  Phlebotominae  (Diptera:  Psychodidae)  de  Mexico.  III.  Las  especies  de 
Lutzomyia  (Psathyromyia)  Barreto,  del  grupo  Aragoi,  de  L.  (Trichopygomyia)  Barreto,  del  grupo 
Dreishachi  y  de  L.  (Nyssomyia)  Barreto.  Folia  Entomologica  Mexicana  41 :  149-183. 

Killick-Kendriek,  R.  1999.  The  biology  and  control  of  phlebotomine  sand  tlies.  Clinics  and  Derm- 
atology 17:279-289. 


Vol.  115.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 291 

Navarro-Correa,  C.  V.  1995.  Especies  de  Lutzomyia  spp.  como  vectores  potenciales  de  leishmani- 
asis  cutanea  localizada  en  una  region  selvatica  del  estado  de  Campeche,  Mexico.  Tesis  Biologo 
(Facultad  de  Medicina  Veterinaria  y  Zootecnia).  Universidad  Autonoma  de  Yucatan,  Mexico.  44 
pp. 

Ortega-Gutierrez,  M.  1966.  Flebotomos  de  la  Cuenca  del  Balsas  (Diptera:  Psychodidae).  Tesis 
Biologo  (Institute  de  Biologia).  Universidad  Nacional  Autonoma  de  Mexico  (Distrito  Federal, 
Mexico).  79  pp. 

Porter,  C.  H.,  F.  J.  Steurer,  and  R.  D.  Kreutzer.  1987.  Isolation  of  Leishmania  mexicana  mexi- 
caiui  from  Lutzomyia  ylephiletor  in  Guatemala.  Transactions  of  the  Royal  Society  of  Tropical 
Medicine  and  Hygiene  81:  929-930. 

Ramirez-Fraire,  A.  1992.  Estudio  de  las  poblaciones  de  Lutzomyia  spp.  (Diptera:  Psychodidae):  su 
variacion  mensual  y  actividad  horaria  en  la  Zona  de  la  Libertad,  Municipio  de  Escarcega,  Cam- 
peche, Mexico.  Tesis  Biologo  (Facultad  de  Medicina  Veterinaria  y  Zootecnia).  Universidad 
Autonoma  de  Yucatan,  Mexico.  36  pp. 

Rebollar-Tellez,  E.  A.  and  P.  Manrique-Saide.  2001 .  New  distributional  record  of  Lutzomyia  cm- 
data  (Diptera:  Phlebotomidae)  in  the  state  of  Yucatan,  Mexico.  Entomological  News  112:  337- 
339. 

Rebollar-Tellez,  E.  A.,  A.  Ramirez-Fraire,  and  F.  J.  Andrade-Narvaez.  1996a.  A  two-year  study 
on  vectors  of  cutaneous  leishmaniasis.  Evidence  for  sylvatic  transmission  cycle  in  the  state  of 
Campeche,  Mexico.  Memorias  do  Institute  Oswaldo  Cruz  91:  555-560. 

Rebollar-Tellez,  E.  A.,  F.  J.  Andrade-Narvaez,  I.  Fernandez-Salas,  and  F.  Reyes-Villanueva. 

1996b.  Collections  of  sand  flies  (Diptera:  Psychodidae)  from  mammal  burrows  in  an  area  of 
cutaneous  leishmaniasis  in  Campeche,  Mexico.  Entomological  News  107:  317-321. 

Rebollar-Tellez,  E.  A.,  F.  Reyes-Villanueva,  I.  Fernandez-Salas,  and  F.  J.  Andrade-Nar- 
vaez. 1996c.  Population  dynamics  and  biting  rhythm  of  the  anthropophilic  sandfly  Lutzomyia 
cruciata  (Diptera:  Psychodidae)  in  southeast  Mexico.  Revista  do  Institute  de  Medicina  Tropical 
de  Sao  Paulo  38:  29-33. 

Rebollar-Tellez,  E.  A.,  F.  Reyes-Villanueva,  I.  Fernandez-Salas,  and  F.  J.  Andrade-Narvaez. 

1996d.  Abundance  and  parity  rate  of  Lutzomyia  cruciata  (Diptera:  Psychodidae)  in  an  endemic 
focus  of  localized  cutaneous  leishmaniasis  in  southern  Mexico.  Journal  of  Medical  Entomology 
33:  683-685. 

Row  ton,  E.,  M.  de  Mata,  N.  Rizzo,  T.  Navin,  and  C.  Porter.  1991.  Vectors  of  Leishmania 
hrazilicnsis  in  the  Peten,  Guatemala.  Parassitologia  (Supplement)  33:  501-504. 

Rowton,  E.,  M.  de  Mata,  N.  Rizzo,  C.  H.  Porter,  and  T.  R.  Navin.  1992.  Isolation  of 7.i -ishmania 
hraziliensis  from  Lutzomyia  ovallesi  (Diptera:  Psychodidae)  in  Guatemala.  American  Journal  of 
Tropical  Medicine  and  Hygiene.  46:  465-468. 

Young,  D.  G.  1979.  A  review  of  the  blood  sucking  Psychodidae  flies  of  Colombia  (Diptera:  Phle- 
botominae  and  Sycoracinae).  IFAS,  University  of  Florida,  Gainesville.  226  pp. 

Young,  D.  G.  and  M.  A.  Duncan.  1994.  Guide  to  the  identification  and  geographic  distribution  of 
Lutzomviti  sand  flies  in  Mexico,  the  West  Indies,  Central  and  South  America  (Diptera:  Psycho- 
didae). Memoirs  of  the  American  Entomological  Institute.  No.  54.  881  pp. 


292  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BOOK  REVIEW 

WHEN  BUGS  WERE  BIG,  PLANTS  WERE  STRANGE,  AND  TETRAPODS 
STALKED  THE  EARTH:  A  Cartoon  Prehistory  of  Life  before  Dinosaurs. 
Hannah  Bonner.  2003.  National  Geographic.  48  pp.  ISBN  0-7922-6326-X. 
US$16.95. 

Although  94  percent  of  the  history  of  life  occurred  before  the  Age  of  Dinosaurs,  few  picture  books 
for  kids  tackle  any  portion  of  that  unfamiliar  span  of  earth's  long  story.  Bonner's  genuinely  funny 
"cartoon  prehistory"  is  the  perfect  format  for  sharing  the  adventure.  A  timeline  makes  clear  just 
what's  meant  by  "before  the  dinosaurs" — the  book  opens  in  the  Carboniferous  Period  (about  355  mil- 
lion years  ago)  and  ends  at  the  close  of  the  Permian  (250  million  years  ago). 

Maps  for  each  period  show  the  supercontinents  Gondwana  and  Pangaea,  with  today's  world  for 
comparison.  In  comical  sidebars,  TV  weather  reptiles  announce  climate  change.  Several  panels  illus- 
trate how  lush  Carboniferous  vegetation  became  the  coal  burned  today  in  power  plants.  That  the  elec- 
tricity in  some  of  our  homes  "is  really  solar  energy  captured  by  plants  hundreds  of  million  of  years 
ago,"  is  information  to  astound  young  and  old  readers. 

Bonner's  detailed  drawings  set  the  Carboniferous  scene  of  lycopods,  horsetails,  and  ferns  as  the 
arthropods  make  their  appearance:  scorpions,  land  snails,  early  daddy  longlegs,  mayflies,  springtails, 
millipedes,  spider  ancestors,  and  palaeodictyopterans.  Immense  Arthropleura  provide  a  starting 
point  for  conjecture  on  why  "XXL  model"  arthropods  became  so  big.  Alongside  an  amusing  depic- 
tion of  modern  and  Carboniferous  "attitudes"  to  cockroaches,  she  explains  possible  reasons  for  roach 
evolutionary  success. 

As  Bonner  shows  rather  than  tells  where  possible,  her  introduction  to  amniotes  (animals  that  lay 
eggs  on  dry  land)  includes  a  cartoon  answer  to  the  old  question — which  came  first,  the  chicken  or  the 
egg?  Kids  will  get  the  picture.  Comic  want  ads  for  bug-eaters  and  restaurant  ads  displaying  tasty  bug 
dishes  allow  young  readers  to  quickly  grasp  one  reason  why  tetrapods  moved  onto  land,  though 
insects  aren't  featured  in  detail  in  the  Permian  half  of  the  book.  The  text  is  straightforward  when  it 
needs  to  be;  excellent  spreads  compare  the  precursors  of  dinosaurs  to  today's  turtles,  birds,  and  rep- 
tiles, and  explore  the  mammal-like  reptiles.  All  of  course  affected  by  the  ultimate  setback  on  the  last 
pages — the  Permian  Extinction  ending  the  Paleozoic  Era. 

An  illustrated  timeline,  chart  of  vertebrate  evolution,  pronouncing  glossary,  and  index  complete 
this  playful  romp  through  100  million  years.  Guaranteed  to  be  enjoyed  by  all  ages,  but  especially 
6-12. 

Suzanne  Mclntire,  Arlington,  Virginia,  U.S.A. 
E-mail:  maxintire(a)comcast.net 


Mailed  on  March  15,  2005 


Vol.  115.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 293 

STATEMENT  OF  OWNERSHIP,  MANAGEMENT, 
AND  CIRCULATION 

1.  Title  of  publication:  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 

2.  Date  of  filing:  February  23,  2005 

3.  Frequency  of  issue:   Bimonthly  except  July  and  August 

4.  Location  of  known  office  of  publication:  American  Entomological  Society, 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway,  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195  U.S.A. 

5.  Location  of  the  headquarters  of  general  business  offices  of  the  publishers: 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway,  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1 195  U.S.A. 

6.  Name  and  address  of  the  Publisher,  Editor,  and  Business  Manager: 

Publisher:  American  Entomological  Society,  1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway,  Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania  19103-1195  U.S.A. 

Editor:  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay,  Department  of  Paleobiology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  His- 
tory, Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A. 

7.  Owner:  American  Entomological  Society,  1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway,  Philadelphia,  Penn- 
sylvania 19103-1195  U.S.A. 

8.  Known  bondholders,  mortgagees,  and  other  security  holders  owning  or  holding  one  percent  or 
more  of  the  total  amounts  of  bonds,  mortgages  and  other  securities:  None 

9.  For  completion  by  nonprofit  organizations  authorized  to  mail  at  special  rates:  The  purpose,  func- 
tion, and  nonprofit  status  of  this  organization,  and  the  exempt  status  for  Federal  income  tax  pur- 
poses have  not  changed  during  the  preceding  12  months. 

10.  Extent  and  Nature  of  Circulation: 

Average  No.  Copies  Actual  No.  Copies  oj 

Each  Issue  During  Single  Issue  Published 

Preceding  12  Mouths         Nearest  to  f-'iling  Date 

A.  Total  number  of  copies  (net  press  run)  596  616 

B.  Paid  and/or  requested  circulation 

1 .  Paid/  requested  outside-county  mail  527 
subscriptions  (includes  exchange  copies) 

2.  Paid/requested  inside/county  mail  0  0 
subscriptions  (includes  exchange  copies) 

3.  Sales  through  dealers  and  carriers  0  0 

4.  Other  classes  mailed  through  USPS  0  0 

C.  Total  paid  and/or  requested  circulation 
[sum  of  H)b(l).  (2),  (3),  and  (4)] 

D.  Free  distribution  by  mail  (samples,  14  14 
complimentary,  and  other  free) 

E.  Free  distribution  outside  the  mail  0  0 

F.  Total  free  distribution  (sum  of  10D  and  10E)  14  14 

G.  Total  distribution  (sum  of  C  and  F)  541  541 
H.    Copies  not  distribution  (office  use) 

I.     TOTAL  (sum  of  G  and  H)  596  630 

J.     Percent  paid/requested  circulation 

(10C/10G  x  100)  97%  97% 

111  certify  that  the  statements  by  me  above  are  correct  and  complete. 


t,     V 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay,  Editor  Entomological  News 


MAILING  DATES 

FOR  VOLUME  115, 

2004 

No.                Date  of  Issue 

1                Jan.  &  Feb.  2004 

Pages 

1-60 

Mailing  Date 

November  12,2004 

2                Mar.  &  Apr.  2004 
3                May  &  June  2004 
4               Sept.  &  Oct.  2004 
5               Nov.  &  Dec.  2004 

61-120 
121-180 
181-240 
24  1  -300 

December  2  1.2004 
January  19.2005 
February  3,  2005 
March"  15.  2005 

294  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  TO  REVIEWERS  OF  ARTICLES 
PUBLISHED  IN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  (VOLUME  115), 

TO  REVIEWERS  OVERLOOKED 
IN  VOLUME  114,  AND  TO  VOLUNTEERS 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay'  and  Sarah  E.  Pivo2 

We  are  profoundly  grateful  to  colleagues  from  around  the  world  who  have 
generously  donated  their  time  and  energy  to  review  numerous  articles.  In  addi- 
tion to  those  reviewers  who  helped  with  contributions  published  on  volume  115, 
we  have  added  the  names  of  a  few  colleagues  overlooked  in  the  Acknowledge- 
ments of  volume  1 14,  with  the  parenthetical  notation  "volume  114."  The  names 
of  all  reviewers  are  arranged  alphabetically  by  last  name;  affiliations,  or  address- 
es, follow. 

David  Adamski  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of  Agri- 
culture, National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia, 
United  States 

Anonymous  (several)     various  affiliations 

Yeon  Jae  Bae  -  Department  of  Biology,  Seoul  Women's  University,  Seoul,  Korea 

Richard  W.  Baumann  Department  of  Zoology  and  Monte  L.  Bean  Life  Science 
Museum,  Brigham  Young  University,  Provo,  Utah,  United  States 

Harry  Brailovsky  -  Departamento  de  Zoologia,  Institute  de  Biologia,  Universidad  Na- 
cional  Autonoma  de  Mexico.  Distrito  Federal.  Mexico,  (volume  1 14  and  volume  115) 

Francisco  Collantes  -  Departamento  de  Zoologia  y  Antropologia  Fisica,  Universidad  de 
Murcia,  Murcia,  Espana 

Jerome  Depaquit  -  Faculte  de  Pharmacie,  Universite  de  Reims,  France 

Christopher  H.  Dietrich  -  Illinois  Natural  History  Survey,  Champaign,  Illinois,  United 
States 

Charles  Dondale     Canada 

David  A.  Etnier  Department  of  Ecology  and  Evolutionary  Biology,  University  of  Ten- 
nessee, Knoxville,  Tennessee,  United  States 

Neal  L.  Evenhuis  -  Department  of  Natural  Sciences,  Bernice  P.  Bishop  Museum,  Hono- 
lulu, Hawaii,  United  States 

Victor  Fet  -  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  Marshall  University,  Huntington,  West 
Virginia,  United  States 

Oliver  Flint  -  Department  of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smith- 
sonian Institution,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United  States 

R.  Wills  Flowers  -  Department  of  Insect  Biodiversity,  Center  for  Biological  Control, 
Florida  A  &  M  University,  Tallahassee,  Florida,  United  States 


1  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Insti- 
tution, P.O.  Box  37012  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20013-7012  United  States.  E-mail: 
blayj(o!si.edu. 

2  Georgetown  University,  Washington,  Distriet  of  Columbia  20057  United  States.  E-mail:  sep27@ 
georgetown.edu. 

Mailed  on  March  15,2005 


Vol.  1 1 5.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2004 295 

Brian  T.  Forschler  --  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Georgia,  Athens, 
Georgia,  United  States 

David  H.  Funk  -  Stroud  Center,  Avondale,  Pennsylvania,  United  States 

Stephen  D.  Gaimari  -  California  State  Collection  of  Arthropods,  Plant  Pest  Diagnostics, 
Sacramento,  California,  United  States 

Michael  Gates  --  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia, 
United  States 

Jon  Gelhaus  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania,  United  States 

Penelope  Greenslade  -  Division  of  Botany  and  Zoology,  Australian  National  University, 
Australian  Capital  Territory,  Australia 

Igor  Grichanov  -  Institute  of  Plant  Protection,  St.  Petersburg-Pushkin,  Russia 

Daniel  V.  Hagan  -  Department  of  Biology,  Partnership  for  Reform  in  Science  and  Mathe- 
matics, Georgia  Southern  University,  Statesboro,  Georgia,  United  States 

Thomas  J.  Henry  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia, 
United  States 

Gary  Hevel  -  Department  of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Wash- 
ington, District  of  Columbia,  United  States 

Sigfrid  Ingrish  --  Zoologisches  Forschungsinstitut  und  Museum  Alexander  Koenig 
(ZFMK),  Bonn,  Germany 

Pierre  Jolivet  -  Paris,  France 

Susan  Jones  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Ohio  State  University,  Columbus,  Ohio, 
United  States 

Susan  Whitney  King  -  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Delaware,  Newark, 
Delaware,  United  States 

Ralph  F.  Kirchner  -  US  Army  Corps  of  Engineers,  Huntington  District,  Water  Manage- 
ment Section,  Apple  Grove,  West  Virginia,  United  States 

Boris  Kondratieff  -  Department  of  Agricultural  Sciences,  Colorado  State  University, 
Fort  Collins,  Colorado,  United  States 

Tom  Klubertanz  -  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  University  of  Wisconsin,  Rock 
County,  Janesville,  Wisconsin,  United  States 

Robert  Lane  Department  of  Environmental  Sciences,  Policy,  and  Management,  Uni- 
versity of  California,  Berkeley,  California,  United  States 

Leng  Choy  Lee  -  Dow  AgroSciences  LLC,  Morrisville,  North  Carolina,  United  States 

Laurent  LeSage     Agriculture  Canada,  Ottawa,  Ontario,  Canada 

John  G.  E.  Lewis  -  Manor  Hill  Farm,  Halse,  Taunton,  Somerset,  United  Kingdom 

Julian  Lewis  -  J.  Lewis  and  Associates,  Cave  Karst  and  Groundwater  Biological  Con- 
sulting, Borden,  Indiana,  United  States 

Jose  A.  Mari-Mutt  -  Department  of  Biology,  University  of  Puerto  Rico,  Mayagiiez, 
Puerto  Rico 

Franco  Mason  -  Ministerio  Politiche  Agricole  e  Forestali,  Centro  Nazionale  Studio  c 
Conservazione  Biodiversita  Forestale,  Verona,  Italy 

Arnold  Menke  -  Bisbee,  Arizona,  United  States 

Charles  D.  Michener  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Snow  Entomological  Collection, 
University  of  Kansas,  Lawrence,  Kansas,  United  States 


296  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Gary  Miller  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of  Agri- 
culture, National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Beltsville,  Maryland,  United  States 
(volume  1 14) 

Alessandro  Minelli  -  Department  of  Biology,  University  of  Padova,  Italy 

Fernando  Montealegre  -  Department  of  Zoology,  University  of  Toronto  (Erindale), 
Mississauga,  Ontario,  Canada 

John  C.  Morse  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Clemson  University,  Clemson,  South  Caro- 
lina, United  States 

Peter  Mundel  --  Department  of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United  States 

C.  Riley  Nelson  -  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  University  of  Texas,  Austin,  Texas, 
United  States 

Charles  H.  Nelson  -  Department  of  Biological  and  Environmental  Sciences,  The  Univer- 
sity of  Tennessee  at  Chattanooga,  Chattanooga,  Tennessee,  United  States 

Alfred  Newton  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Chi- 
cago, Illinois,  United  States 

Becky  Nichols  -  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  Gatlinburg,  Tennessee,  United 
States 

Michael  Ohl  -  Institut  fur  Systematische  Zoologie,  Museum  fur  Naturkunde,  Berlin,  Ger- 
many 

J.  Olejnieek  -  Institute  of  Parasitology,  Academy  of  Sciences,  Ceske  Budejovice,  Czech 
Republic 

Stewart  B.  Peck  -  Department  of  Biology,  Carleton  University,  Ottawa,  Ontario,  Canada 

Jim  Pecor  -  Walter  Reed  Biosystematics  Unit,  Museum  Support  Center,  Suitland,  Mary- 
land, United  States 

M.  L.  Pescador  Department  of  Entomology,  Florida  A  &  M  University,  Tallahassee, 
Florida,  United  States 

Janice  G.  Peters  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Florida  A  &  M  University,  Tallahassee, 
Florida,  United  States 

Dan  Polhemus  Department  of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United  States 

Jerry  A.  Powell  -  Department  of  Environmental  Sciences,  Policy,  and  Management, 
University  of  California,  Berkeley,  California,  United  States 

Wojciech  Pulaski  -  Department  of  Entomology,  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San 
Francisco,  California,  United  States 

Patrick  Randolph  -  Division  of  Biological  Sciences,  Section  of  Evolution  and  Ecology, 
University  of  California,  Davis,  California,  United  States 

David  C.  F.  Rentz  -  Kuranda,  Queensland,  Australia 

Barton  A.  Richard  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Florida  Agricultural  and  Mechanical 
University,  Tallahassee,  Florida 

Rudolf  Rozkosny  -  Masaryk  University,  Kotlarska  Czech  Republic 

Jerome  C.  Rozen,  Jr.  Division  of  Invertebrate  Zoology,  American  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  New  York,  New  York,  United  States 

Justin  D.  Runyon  Department  of  Entomology,  Pennsylvania  State  University, 
University  Park,  Pennsylvania,  United  States 

Carl  Schaefer  -  Department  of  Ecology  and  Evolutionary  Biology,  University  of  Con- 
necticut, Storrs,  Connecticut,  United  States 


Vol.  115.  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 297 

Michael  Schmitt  -  Zoologisches  Forschungsinstitut  und  Museum  Alexander  Koenig, 

Sektion  Coleoptera,  Bonn,  Germany 
William  A.  Shear  -  Department  of  Biology,  Hampden-Sydney  College,  Virginia,  United 

States 

Takao  Shimizu     Funabashi,  Chiba,  Japan 
Michael  Soleglad     Borrego  Springs,  California,  United  States 
William  P.  Stark  -  Department  of  Biology,  Mississippi  College,  Clinton,  Mississippi, 

United  States 

Kenneth  Stewart     Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  University  of  North  Texas,  Den- 
ton,  Texas,  United  States 
John  Stireman  -  Department  of  Ecology,  Evolution  and  Organismal  Biology,  Iowa  State 

University,  Ames,  Iowa,  United  States 
John  S.  Strazanac  -  Plant  and  Soil  Science  and  Entomology,  West  Virginia  University, 

Morgantown,  West  Virginia,  United  States 
Stanley  W.  Szczytko  -  College  of  Natural  Resources,  University  of  Wisconsin,  Stevens 

Point,  Wisconsin,  United  States 
F.  Christian  Thompson     Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department 

of  Agriculture,   National   Museum   of  Natural   History,   Washington,   District   of 

Columbia,  United  States 
Mustafa  LJnal  -  Abant    izzet  Universitesi,  Fen-Edebiyat  Fakiiltesi,  Biyoloji  Boliimii, 

Bolu,  Turkey 
Robert  Waltz  -  Division  of  Entomology  and  Plant  Pathology,  Indiana  Department  of 

Natural  Resources,  Indianapolis,  Indiana,  United  States 

Mick  E.  Webb  -  Entomology  Department,  The  Natural  History  Museum,  South  Kensing- 
ton, London,  England,  United  Kingdom 
A.  Wheeler-  Department  of  Entomology,  Clemson  University,  Clemson,  South  Carolina, 

United  States 
T.  A.  Wheeler  -  Department  of  Natural  Resource  Sciences,  McGill  University  (Macdon- 

ald  Campus),  Ste.  Anne  de  Bellevue,  Quebec  H9X  3V9  Canada  (volume  114) 
Michael  F.  Whiting  -  Department  of  Integrative  Biology,  Brigham  Young  University, 

Provo,  Utah,  United  States 
Richard   Wilkerson        Walter  Reed   Biosystematics   Unit,   Smithsonian   Institution, 

Museum  Support  Center,  Suitland,  Maryland,  United  States 
Norman  Woodley  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of 

Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia. 

United  States 
Xiangchu  Yin     China 
Richard  Zack  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Washington  State  University,  Pullman, 

Washington,  United  States 

Also,  we  wish  to  highlight  the  labor  of  volunteers  who  have  worked  with 
JASB  at  the  Smithsonian  Institution  (Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United 
States).  As  part  of  their  learning,  they  have  helped  in  different  steps  of  the  edito- 
rial process:  Rama  Assaf  (Montgomery  College,  Rockville,  Maryland),  Judy 
Barr  (Holton-Arms  School,  Bethesda,  Maryland),  Gloria  Friar  (Program  tor  Deaf 
and  Hard  of  Hearing,  Prince  George's  County  Public  Schools,  Upper  Marlboro, 
Maryland),  Carmen  Montopoli  (School  Without  Walls  High  School,  Washington, 
District  of  Columbia),  and  Suzanne  C.  Shaffer  (Montgomery  College,  Rockville, 
Maryland).  Any  omission  was  unintentional  and  entirely  the  responsibility  of 
JASB.  Any  colleague  whose  name  has  been  omitted  is  welcome  to  contact  the 
Editor  as  we  wish  to  dutifully  acknowledge  everyone  who  has  helped. 


298 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


INDEX  —  VOLME  115  (1-5)  2004 


Acanthocrabro 157 

Acknowledgments 294 

Acrididae 54 

Aetalion  reticulatum 52 

Aetalionidae 52 

Alydidae 15 

Amber  (Dominican) 55 

Amphibia 55 

Amphinemura 227 

An,  Shuwen 11 

Anderson,  S.  R 55 

Apoidea 157 

Apogonalia 67 

Araneae 44 

Argentina 61,  249 

Artie  forestfly 113 

Asiain,  J 255 

Asteraceae 273 

Australia 1 

Bae,Y.  J 1 

Baetidae 93,  121,  139 

Baetis 139 

Baquero,  E 31,  229 

Bates,  A.  J 49 

Baumann,  R.  W 113 

Bembidion  atrocaentleum 49 

Bembidion  decorum 49 

Biology 255 

Blanidlidae 101 

Bolivia 249 

Braconidae 175 

Brailovsky,  Harry 15 

Brazil  249 

Bugs  Before  Time:  Prehistoric  Insects  and 

their  Relatives  (Book  Review) 60 

Burks,  R.  A 273 

Burrowing  mayflies 84 

Butterfly  collection,  Peale back  cover  (1) 

Caenochlox  fenyesi 61 

Calcaterra,  L.  A 61 

California,  U.S. A 54 

Campbell,  I.  C 1 

Campeche 283 

Camper,  Cathy 60 

Canada 101.213 

Carabidae 49 

Cataractocoris 173 

Centaitrea  bierberteinii 273 

Centipede 78,  116,  178 

Central  (Middle)  America 1 5 

Centroptilum 121 

Cenwang  Mountain 201 

Chagas,  A 178 

Che-Mendoza,  A 283 

Chilopoda 78 

China 11,35,  135,  157,201,227,263,279 


Chloropidae 1 1 

Chloropinae 11 

Cfwneiuliis  palmatus 101 

Chordeumatida 71 

Christiansen,  Kenneth 31,  229 

Chrysomelidae 108 

Cicadellidae 67,241 

Cicadellinae 241 

Clarifications 191 

Cleidogena  nantahala 71 

Cleidogonidae 71 

Coleoptera 49 

Collembola 31,229 

Colombia 241 

Cook,  J.  L 61 

Corrigendum 30,  48 

Coscaron,  M.  del  C 249 

Crabronidae 157 

Crossocems 157 

Cromartie,  W.  J back  cover  (5) 

Culicidae 181 

Desneux 237 

Diplopoda 71,  101 

Diptera.  ...11,  35,  171,  163,  181,  219,  273,  283 

Distribution  61 

Dolichopodidae 35,  219 

Dominican  amber 55 

Dominican  Republic 67 

Dzul-Manzanilla,  F 181,  283 

Earle,  J.  L 191 

Early  American  Naturalists:  Exploring  the 
American  West  1804-1900  (Book  Review). 58 

Ecoregions 191 

Edwards,  G.  B 116 

Elachistidae 135 

Emendation 213 

Engel,  M.  S 168,  169 

Enghoff,  L.  M 101 

Entomobryidae 229 

Entomobryomorpha 31,  229 

Ephemeroptera 1,84,93,  121,  139,213 

Ethmia 135 

Ethmiinae 135 

Exposed  riverine  sediments  (ERS) 49 

Female 44 

Figueroa  De  la  Rosa,  J.  1 175 

Finlay,  K.  J 1 

First  record 54,  237 

Florida,  U.S. A 116 

Fossil  Revolution.  The  Finds  That  Changed 
Our  Views  of  the  Past  (Book  Review) 

back  cover  (2) 

Freytag,  P.  H 67,  241 

Frog,  leptodactylid 55 

Gelhaus,  J back  cover  (1),  back  cover  (2), 

back  cover  (3),  240,  back  cover  (5) 


Vol.  115,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2004 


299 


Genitalia 263 

Geographic  distribution 255 

Getze,  F.  B 162 

Gorochov.  A.V. 263 

Gray,  D.  A 171 

Halictidae 169 

Halictus  cubensis  Spinola 169 

Hammacerinae 249 

Hasbenli,  A 163 

He,J 157 

Hemiptera 15,  52 

Henson,  R.  N 207 

Hercostomus 35,  219 

Heteroptera 173,249 

Higher  classification 84 

Hispanobrya 229 

Holarctic..' 101 

Homoptera 67,  241 

Hopalopsole  shimentaiensis 279 

Host  association 61 

Host  specificity  61 

Host  switching 61 

Houghton,  D.  C 129 

Houseman,  R.  M 237 

Hydropsychidae 129 

Hymenoptera 52,  169,  175,  157,273 

Iberian  Peninsula 229 

Insect  meals  (of  frog) 55 

Insecta 15 

Introduced  millipede 101 

Isoptera 168,237 

Jacobus,  L.M 93 

Janbechynea 1 08 

Jappa 1 

Jarvis,  L.  R 201 

Jiang,  G 201 

Jordana,  R 31,229 

Julida 101 

Kang,  L 263 

Kondrateiff,  B.  C 1 1 3 

Kuehnl,  K.  F 139 

Krishna,  K 168 

Kuehn,  F.  B 292 

Lehmkuhl,  D.  M 213 

Leishmaniasis 283 

Leistotrophus  versicolor 255 

Lepidoptera 135 

Leptodactyidae 55 

Lctophlebiidae 1 

Leuctridae 279 

Li,  H 129 

Li.Q 157 

Li,  W 226,279 

Liang,  G 201 

Linyphiidae 44 

Lopez-Martinez,  V. 175 

MacCarroll,  M.  A 52 

Macromotettix  serrifemoralis  female 201 


Manrique-Saide,  P. 181,  283 

Mark-release-recapture 49 

Mark-toxicity 49 

Marquez,  J 255 

Martinez,  M 229 

Marshall,  J.  M 273 

Masunaga,  K 35,  219 

Mayfly 1,213 

McCafferty.  W.  P. 84,  93,121,  213 

Mclntire,  S 60,  292,  298 

Melo,  M.  C 249 

Mesoamerica 173 

Mexico  108,  175,  181,255,283 

Meyer,  M.  D 93 

Michigan,  U.S. A 273 

Micrelytrinae 15 

Microcemtennes  serrula 237 

Microtomus  reuteri 249 

Microhabitat 147 

Middle  America 15 

Milliped 71 

Miocene 55 

Mirrollia 279 

Moring,  J 58 

Moth  collection,  Peale back  cover  (1) 

Myrmecolacidae 61 

Najera-Vasquez,  R 181 

Naucoridae 1 73 

Nelson.  C.  R 139 

Newfoundland,  Canada 44 

Nemoura  arctica 1 13 

Nemouridae 1 13,  227 

New  distribution  records 181 

New  England,  U.S.A 71 

New  genus 229 

New  locality  records 101 

New  provincial  records 93 

New  record 191,213 

New  species 11,  15,35,67,  135,  139,  163, 

219, 227, 229,  263,  279 

New  state 93 

New  synonyms 121 

Night  Visions:  The  Secret  Designs  of  Moths 

(Book  Review) 59 

North  America 181,93 

North  American  Polideini 171 

North  central  USA 129 

Nothohrya 31 

Nunez,  L 61 

O'Hara.  J.  E 171 

O'Neill,  J 298 

Orchesellinae 31 

Orsodacnidae 108 

Orthoptera 54.  1 7 1 ,  279 

Olostigminae 116 

(hvicru  turcica 163 

Pacific  Islands 78 

Paquin,  P 146 


300 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Palmer,  D back  cover  (2) 

Parasitism 61 

Parker,  D.  W 213 

Peale,  T back  cover  ( 1 ) 

Pennsylvania,  USA 191 

Peru 52 

Perustigminae 178 

Peruatignnts 178 

Phaneropterinae 279 

Phlebotomidae 283 

Phlebotominae 283 

Phylopotamidae 129 

Pickavance,  J.  R 44 

Pivo,  S.  E 294 

Platycephala 1 1 

Plecoptera 113,  227,  191 

Polideini 171 

Pollutes  eiythrocephahts 52 

Procloeon 121 

Pteromalidae 273 

Pteromalus  cardui 273 

R.xni 279 

Ramosulus 241 

Rebollar-Tellez,  E.A 283 

Redescription 249 

Reduviidae 249 

Reeves,  W.  K 52 

Rhvsida  I.  longipes 1 1 6 

Romero,  J 175 

Rhvsida 116 

Sabido,  M 181 

Sadler,  J.  P 49 

Sampling 147 

Sanchez,  J 175 

Santiago-Blay,  J.  A 58,  back  cover  (2),  108, 

294,298 

Saskatchewan,  Canada 213 

Scapphodonta 84 

Scheer,  Joseph 59 

Schuler,  K.  M 59 

Scolopendra  morsitans 78 

Scolopcndridae 78,  116,  178 

Scolopendromorpha 78,  116,  17S 

Shanover,  T 180 

Shear,  W.  A 71 

Shelley,  R.  M 71,  78,  101,  116,  178 

Sissom,  D 207 

Sites,  R.  W 173 

Small  minnow  mayflies 93 

Snow 147 

Society  Meeting  (Feb.  24,  04)  ..back  cover  ( 1 ), 

120,  back  cover  (3),  back  cover  (5) 

Solenopsis  invicta 61 

South  America 15 

Spain 229 

Spichiger,  S back  cover  (3) 


Spotted  knapweed 273 

Staphylinidae 255 

Sticthippus  californicus 54 

Stictophaula 263 

Stidham,  Thomas  A 54 

Stonefly 191,  279 

Storer,  A.  J 273 

Stratiomyidae 163 

Strepsiptera 61 

Supennale 129 

Tachinidae 171 

Taiwan 219 

Taxonomy 255 

Tenuiphanles  cracens 44 

Tephritidae 273 

Termite 168 

Termitidae 237 

Tetrix  ri/vuunenisi  male 201 

Tetrigoidea 201 

Tettigoniidae 263 

Thailand 237 

Tisona  tida 101 

Trache/iiim 15 

Tun-Ku,  E 181,283 

Turkey 163 

Ulmerophlebia 1 

Urophora  quadrifasciata 273 

Urosigalphus 1 75 

Urosigalphus  mimosestes 1 75 

U.S.A 101,203 

Ustuner,  T 163 

Utah,  U.S.A 139 

Vespidae 52 

Wang,S 129 

Webb,  J.  M 93,  213 

Weintraub,  Jason  D back  cover  ( 1 ) 

Western  Guangxi  Autonomous  Region 201 

When  bugs  were  big,  plants  were  strange, 
and  Tetrapods  stalked  the  Earth:  a  cartoon 
prehistorv  of  life  before  dinosaurs 

(book  review) 293 

White,  H.  B back  cover  (4) 

Wiersema,  N.  A 121,  139 

Winter 147 

Yang,  Ding 11,  35.219,226.  279 

Yucatan,  Mexico 181 

Zhang,  Lili 35,219 

Zhu.  F 226,  279 

Jessi  O'Neill  (Herndon,  Virginia,  USA), 
Suzanne  Mclntire  (Arlington,  Virginia,  USA), 

and 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay, 

Editor,  Entomological  News 

(Washington,  DC,  USA) 


Agreement.  By  submitting  a  paper  for  publication,  authors  tacitly  agree  to  not  submit  in  parallel 
the  same  manuscript  to  another  journal.  For  published  papers,  authors  agree  to  accept  responsibility 
for  all  page,  illustration,  and  requested  reprint  charges.  Rejected  manuscripts  will  be  discarded,  ex- 
cept for  original  artwork  and  photographs,  which  will  be  returned  to  the  authors. 

Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews.  These  are  much  shorter  contributions,  typically  not  exceed- 
ing two  printed  pages.  The  main  difference  between  these  types  of  contributions  and  longer  papers  is 
that  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews  lack  an  abstract  and  most  of  the  main  headings,  except  for  the 
acknowledgments  and  the  literature  cited  sections. 

Reviewers.  When  submitting  papers,  all  authors  are  requested  to  provide  the  names  of  two  qual- 
ified individuals  who  have  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  before  it  is  submitted  to  Entomological 
News.  The  receipt  of  all  papers  will  be  acknowledged  and,  if  accepted,  they  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  possible. 

All  papers,  except  book  reviews,  are  forwarded  to  experts  for  final  review  before  acceptance.  In 
order  to  expedite  the  review  process,  authors  are  also  asked  to  suggest  the  name,  address,  email,  tele- 
phone and  fax  of  at  least  three  experts  in  the  subject  field  to  whom  the  manuscript  may  be  forward- 
ed for  additional  review.  Ideally,  the  review  process  should  be  completed  within  30  days.  The  editor 
reserves  his  prerogative  of  sending  the  manuscript  to  other  reviewers.  Authors  are  also  welcome  to 
list  the  names  of  reviewers  to  whom  the  article  should  not  be  sent,  with  a  brief  explanation. 

Upon  return  of  reviews,  authors  will  be  asked  to  modify  or  rewrite  their  texts  to  accommodate 
suggestions  of  the  reviewers  and  the  editor  as  well  as  to  conform  to  requirements  of  Entomological 
News.  If  authors  do  not  modify  their  texts,  they  should  specifically  address,  on  a  point  by  point  basis, 
why  they  are  not  doing  that. 

Page  Proofs.  The  printer  will  send  page  proofs  to  the  editor  and  the  business  manager.  Faith 
Kuehn.  Then,  the  proofs  will  be  sent  to  the  corresponding  author  as  .pdf  files,  together  with  the 
reprint  order  form  as  an  .rtf  file.  Authors  must  process  proofs  and  return  them  to  the  editor  and  to  the 
business  editor  by  air  mail  or  e-mail  (attachment).  Authors  who  anticipate  being  absent  are  urged  to 
provide  forwarding  addresses  or  to  provide  temporary  addresses  (with  dates).  Proofs  not  approved 
within  one  week  will  be  published  as  is.  The  editor  will  collect  the  page  proofs  and  send  them  to  the 
printer. 

Page  and  Reprint  Charges.  Authors  will  be  charged  by  two-page  increments.  Charges  for  pub- 
lication in  Entomological  News  are  US$25.00  per  published  page  (or  part)  for  members  and 
US$30.00  per  published  page  (or  part)  for  nonmembers.  Authors  will  be  charged  for  all  text  figures 
and  halftones  at  the  rate  of  US$30.00  each,  regardless  of  size.  There  are  no  discounts.  There  are  no 
page  charges  for  book  reviews.  Page  and  reprint  charges  will  be  billed  by  Faith  Kuehn,  to  whom  com- 
munications and  remittances  of  page  charges  and  reprints  should  be  sent.  FK  address  is:  3789  Foulk 
Road,  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania  19061  U.S.A.  E-mail:  fbkuehn@yahoo.com. 

Articles  longer  than  20  printed  pages  of  Entomological  News  may  be  published  in  two  or  more 
installments,  unless  the  author  is  willing  to  pay  the  entire  cost  of  a  sufficient  number  of  additional 
pages  in  any  one  issue  to  enable  such  an  article  to  appear  without  division. 

If  hard  copy  reprints  are  desired,  they  must  be  ordered  together  with  the  proofs.  Reprints  as  .pdf 
files  are  available  for  the  authors.  For  options  and  charges,  contact  the  business  manager. 

Entomological  News  is  printed  by  Dover  Litho  Printing  Company,  1211  North  DuPont  Highway, 
Dover,  Delaware  19901  U.S.A.  Telephone  (302)  678-121 1:  fax:  (302)  678-8091;  toll-free  telephone 
(800)  366-9132;  Web  Page:  www.doverlitho.com.  Dover  Litho  has  been  recognized  by  DENREC  and 
DELRAP  Green  Industries  as  "The  Most  Environmentally  Conscious  Printer  in  the  State  of  Dela- 
ware." 

Entomological  News  is  available  in  microform  from  ProQuest  Information  and  Learning.  Call 
toll-free  (800)  521-3042.  (800)  521-0600,  (734)  761-4700.  Mail  inquiry  to:  ProCniest  Information 
and  Learning.  300  North  Zeeb  Road,  Ann  Arbor,  Michigan  48106-9866  U.S.A. 

Entomological  News  is  listed  in  the  Science  Citation  Index  Expanded. 


SMITHSONIAN  INSTfTUTION  LIBRARIES 


39088011396686 
SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  NOVEMBER  10,  2004 

Biomonitoring  Pinelands  Rivers  using  Snag-dwelling  Insects 

Dr.  William  J.  Cromartie 

Richard  Stockton  College 

Pomona,  New  Jersey,  U.S.A. 

Dr.  Cromartie  discussed  his  biological  monitoring  research  program  to  improve 
methods  for  ascertaining  water  quality  using  aquatic  macroinvertebrates,  mostly 
insects.  Faculty  and  students  of  the  Environmental  Studies  Program  (ENVL)  at 
Richard  Stockton  College  (Pomona,  New  Jersey)  are  working  with  the  New  Jersey 
Department  of  Environmental  Protection,  the  Pinelands  Commission,  and  the  Great 
Egg  Harbor  Watershed  Association  to  develop  better  invertebrate  bioassays  for  the 
acidic,  blackwater,  sandy-bottomed  streams  in  the  New  Jersey  Pinelands. 

In  spring  2002,  the  ENVL  team  devised  a  conceptual  model  of  water  quality  in 
the  Great  Egg  Harbor  River  based  on  chemical  and  biological  data  as  well  as  per- 
cent developed  land  in  each  sub-watershed.  In  summer  2002,  they  collected  macro- 
invertebrates  from  diverse  substrates  and  measured  pH  as  well  as  specific  conduc- 
tance. Macroinvertebrates  were  identified  in  the  laboratory,  and  multivariate  analy- 
sis was  performed  on  the  data.  This  preliminary  research  showed  that  percent  of 
developed  land  seemed  to  be  the  best  predictor  of  water  quality  and  biological 
impairment.  Based  on  this  preliminary  analysis,  the  ENVL  team  focused  on  woody 
debris,  which  is  known  to  be  a  key  habitat  for  blackwater  macroinvertebrates.  In 
2003  and  2004,  they  collected  chemical  data  and  additional  replicated  samples  of 
1-2  meters  of  woody  debris  (5-35  mm  diameter).  There  was  a  clear  relationship 
among  stream  chemistry,  land  use,  and  the  fauna  on  woody  debris,  indicating  that 
this  assemblage  is  a  reasonable  target  for  monitoring.  This  monitoring  method 
clearly  indicates  the  sites  with  fairly  pristine  conditions  and  those  that  are  very  dis- 
turbed, but  it  has  difficulty  accurately  discriminating  among  sites  showing  less 
severe  and  more  diverse  types  of  impairment.  More  information  on  this  research 
can  be  found  on  the  web  at:  http://www.stockton.edu/-cromartw/GEHR/GEHR% 
20homepage.htm. 

About  30  members  and  visitors  attended  the  meeting. 

Jon  Gelhaus,  Corresponding  Sec.  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (2004) 

E-mail:  gelhaus@acnatsci.org 


78315988  14  J 

10/11/05  yfi      t 

Mailed  on  March  15.2005 


?.™»'NSTrTUTION  LIBRARIES 


390880129171100