Skip to main content

Full text of "Evidences Relating to the Eastern Part of the City of Kingston-upon-Hull: By ..."

See other formats


Google 



This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project 

to make the world's books discoverable online. 

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject 

to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books 

are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. 

Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the 

publisher to a library and finally to you. 

Usage guidelines 

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the 
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to 
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. 
We also ask that you: 

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for 
personal, non-commercial purposes. 

+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine 
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the 
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. 

+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find 
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. 

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just 
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other 
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of 
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner 
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe. 

About Google Book Search 

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers 
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web 

at |http: //books .google .com/I 



^\ ^..-^A 






i 






■ J* ''- -■' ■ ■• .*•■ ;'■ .-r '■■* - ' 

>• ■' -* ■: ill I 













■ y 


". , 4. 


C'' 


'A J ^ 


r 


i- ■* 




.'>■'■■ 




% 




v 




:v^-' 


:4 







.* 









■ .- -'V *■ ' - ^.---,, 



:-. V 






w 



-h"y ■*■ 



■ «*. '-': 



': .'" \-'/" 



.-..^ '>;^'- 


■ — ' , *-'■ ; --'■"- 




.-■ i^i-^j _'"' \ - ; 


■, -- * ■ V - 




f _■ '^ _; 




. •€■' 











^-■v 



■ '' '-- Ai-/ 












-■• jf 



^ ., . (-' 



■■'. K ■'^-\- ,' /;■• -,V^'^ -■■.^<' -K..-^--'- ■■^■v- ■■' 

' ; ^.\\"\'.' . '^ .^ '.*,>-,-<--■"-■.: ;^ ■ 1-:: 



' ,>."^"^ >w,H/-/ 



.,>>.*.- 






r ■ ^ *^ * 



A- '^'V 






^ 4- S r.r* V^' *-; >. v,..jr'.,, .;.- 



: : %.. -i x'. 



■■ ■ '' '■- ."Y'- ■ '" 
■■/ ' 'V-' . ...•■.■■ 

■ ■-•■. .p - ->** '"" " 






1 



'■<•»' 






i - 



•f^. 



;, - ■. «T. .■■■ -jiv ,j : :■"* , ,.% .yf< 
^' -.: „ \' iv" ^^^>.- - •-'•'• ■ ■ .■ 'tit* 



•^-' -,. 



^ V 






'v V> 






■) :>■ 



1/ ': 



:> ->' 









-'. '•. . - /.v- ' ."l .■--'"■ ■■■■-■ ^'-' 



',:-^*f;-v-^\e. 






Si. t* 



- ••/'■ 












,/r.^ 






■»^^ .' 



1- »•■'.-•■. ■ 



«, I ■ ■;*• ,•- 



- - ; »; -N ... '■ ■ • ..;■<, .'•■ » - .> . . . r »■ 



^v-• 



^c>:;^ i 



i!kl'''^rA 






'■^IS^V. : 









..<--i 



. »> »-" " ,;. 



■■! ., ■. ■ 






ivf^ ••.*^^-^; c^.- 



.■ f^ 



J- -' I-'-- 



'). . J ;,■ .•_.■■* >il-~ ^ 1.-. 



w -'^ ■..'. ■ ■ '■ ,.■ .- -. iV"'' -■*? .c -v -' ''. ,■ - - -*■• •- '^y. '^i^y .;V*' '^■' ■•;.■ " 

" ,, ..■;,%-<:■ ■-.'■- .^>"-' ■■ A .'ft, ' 4 "> ■■' * • •■ ■•• ■ ■ ■-, ■•:-: ^. ^ - '• 



•^' iii^S:: 






EVIDENCES 



RELATING TO THE 



EASTERN PART OF THE CITY 



OF 



KINGSTON-UPON-HULL. 



BY 



THOMAS BLASHILL, F.R.I. B.A. 



HULL: 

A. BROWN & SONS, Limited, 
26 & 27, Savile Street ; 6 & 8, King Edward Street. 

1903. 



cut-. 



V 



I 

t 



T^s^/fJi^L 



I 



PREFACE. 

N January last, at very short notice, I submitted to the 
Hull Scientific and Field Naturalists' Club some notes 
on that part of the City of Kingston-upon-Hull which lies 
east of the river — Marfleet being then, as now, excepted. 
^ Portions of the paper were quoted from my book on Sutton 

1 in Holderness, but in general the matter was from authorities 

^ that were new, or that had not been used for this particular 

purpose. By the kindness of friends, and owing to some 
good luck otherwise, this matter has grown considerably, 
but it is still no more than a collection of evidence bearing 
on a branch of local history. 

If I have ventured to dissent from the views of former 
writers, even from Frost, I am not unmindful of the prob- 
ability that exception will be taken to some of those herein 
expressed, or that errors will be found which I have 
overlooked. 

I have not encumbered the pages with many notes and 
references, but where it seemed necessary the sources of 
separate items of information have been given. In general 
the transactions in land will be found in the East Riding 
Registrv at Beverley under the years given. The wills, 
except a few that I have seen, are at York. The thirteenth 
century charters, relating to Swine, are in the Stowe 
Collection at the British Museum. Items relating to Meaux 
Abbey are from the Chronica Monasterii de Melsa in the 
Master of the Rolls* series. Particulars of the 'property 
of the Religious Houses are from the Augmentation Office 
papers in the Public Record Office. The Dodsworth MSS. 



IV PREFACE. 

in the Bodleian Library at Oxford might be consulted for 
furtl^er information relating to Drypool, also the East Riding 
Registry. There are a few cases in which I have given no 
references, but I hope to deposit all the notes and copies of 
documents used for this book and for Sutton in Holderness 
in some suitable place for general reference. 

Of those who haVe kindly given me information on par- 
ticular points I must here thank Mr. Fred. A. Scott, Mr. J. 
Spyvee Cooper, and Mr. H. F. Smith in respect of lands in 
Drypool and the Groves, Mr. J. Travis-Cook, F.R.Hist. 
Socy., Councillor J. G. Hall, who has studied the Drypool 
Registers, Mr. G. H. Hill, who has investigated the ancient 
boundaries, and Mr. W. Brown, for permission to copy some 
drawings in his possession. I have mentioned other names 
in the text, particularly that of Mr. J. R. Boyle, F.S.A., in 
respect of the older documents of the Corporation which I 
had leave to consult. And I must add the name of Mr. 
Thomas Sheppard, F.G.S., who, having invited me to the 
task, has facilitated it with a patience which I can only 
hope is not feigned I 

Great part of the book consists of matter which, by the 
kindness of the Corporation of Hull I have been allowed to 
gather out of its records. As a native of the quiet hamlet of 
Stoneferry, very familiar once with these eastern suburbs, I 
desire to inscribe this book to the body which, during the 
mayoralty of Sir Alfred Gelder, has done so much for the j 

improvement of the expanding City. ! 

THOMAS BLASHILL. I 



29, Tavistock Square, 
London. 



CONTENTS. 



PACK 

Introduction i 

Embankments and Reclaimation. — The Manors and Berewics. 



Dripole, in the Parish of Sutton . . . .11 

The Groves in Ancient Dripole. — Blockhouse Lane. — Summer- 
gangs Dike. — The Fortifications. — High Road to Sutton. — 
Lime Street. — The Brick Kilns. — Sugar House and the Thorn- 
tons. — TheSpyvees. — Sutton Drain. — Quakers' Burial Ground. 
— Drypool Field. — Magnusdaile. — The Clow Dike. — Burial 
Ground at the Outhouses. 

Hull, in the Manor of Sutton . . . - 25 

Evidences of an Older Hull. — The Port and River. — The Ings. 
— The Meadows of Sutton and of Hull and of Dripole. — A 
Writ of Dower, — The Reeve of Hull. — Grant of Bondsmen. 
Meaux Abbey and Wyke with My ton. — The Ville de Hull. — 
Sayer, the King's Bailiff. — Roads to Stoneferry. 

Stoneferry . . . . . . . -32 

Stanford Rak ? — Ankedam. — Antholme dike. — Leads road, 
bridge, and common. — The White House a Manor House. — 
Cardinal Wolsey. — Henry VHL — Constable, Watson, Trus- 
love, and Broadley. — Ann Watson's College. — Spinning. — 
Katherine Hillyard. — Lopholme Hamlet. 

The West Carr and Sutton Ings .... 39 

The Monks of Meaux. — Dudley, Duke of Northumberland. — 
The Earl of Leicester. — The Stainmar. — Sutton Drain. — 
Hedon Croft. — Swine Lathes. — Countess Croft. 



VI CONTENTS. 

FAGE 

SOUTHCOATES 42 

The Domesday Survey. — Chapel of St. Mary. — Sir John de 

Sutton. — Riots in his Manors. — The Holdemess Road. — The 

open Fields. — The Ewelands. — The Chimney Lands. — The 1 

Manor Courts. — Fines and Disputes. — "Nobles " of pasturag'e. ' 

— Sir Philip Constabte.-rjohn Dalton. — Enclosures of open 

fields. — Holdemess House. — The Holdemess Road fifty years 

ago. 

Drypool in Swine 64 

Drypool Church. — Its separation from Swine. — The Amescroft 
and Kirke Field. — Piece of Southcoates detached. — Dissolu- 
tion of Swine Priory, Thornton Abbey, and Carthusian Priory I 
at Hull.— Fortifications of Henry VHI. — Disposal of surplus 
lands. — Parish Registers. — Seventeenth century Citadel. — 
Families of Popple, Watson, Bromfiete, St. Quintin, Blaides, 
Pool. — Modem changes. — Anticipations. 



EVIDENCES RELATING TO 

EAST HULL. 



INTRODUCTION. 

Embankments and Reclaimation. — The Manors and Berewics. 

'nr^HE extended boundary of the eastern portion of the 
-■" City of Kingston-upon-HuU includes the modern 
parish of Drypool-with-Southcoates and a large portion 
of the parish of Sutton, consisting chiefly of the hamlet 
of Stoneferry. It includes, also, the more distant 
Marfleet. New streets and buildings are fast obliterating 
ancient sites, with the boundaries of at least half a dozen 
manors, and it is important to put upon record, before it is 
too late, the former condition of these territories. I shall 
have to use some of the materials already published in my 
"History of Sutton," and must refer to it for fuller details 
on many matters, but it was my research for that object 
which made possible this contribution to local history. 

In early times, when the district east of the valley of the 
Hull was called the Isle of Holderness, that wide low-lying 
valley, except in a few favoured spots, was freely subject to 
the tidal ebb and flow. The date of the embankment of the 
Humber and the Hull is too large a question to be settled 



8 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

apart from other investigations, but, judging from the 
inadequate description of Sutton in Domesday Book, I have 
suggested that, in 1086, all our low grounds were still 
overflowed by the tides. The historical and topographical 
interest of the locality is, however, not dependent on the 
precise date of the reclamation. 

Beginning with the group of manors, or reputed manors, 
in the parish of Sutton, we first find that Domesday Book 
associates the Manor of Sudtone, held under the Lord of 
Holderness, with a berewic held under the Archbishop's 
College of St. John of Beverley. The owners of manor and 
berewic had each his house with its enclosed land, but the 
tillage and meadows of both were in narrow strips or in 
plots, mixed together all over the area ; the manor consist- 
ing of about three-fourths, and the berewic one-fourth of the 
whole. In time, the berewic began to be called a manor, 
and the manor itself became divided amongst many persons, 
each of whom described his share as if it were the whole. 

For clearness, and also because of the interest which is 
given to the story, places and persons must be associated 
together. The following were the lords of the undivided 
manor as it descended from father to son ; all were of 
knightly rank : — 

Siward, living in the time of the Conqueror. 
Sayer de Sutton ist, **the ould lord Sayer." 
William, mentioned in 1173. 
Amandus, mentioned in 11 87 and 1195. 
Sayer 2nd, the King's Bailiff of the Port of Hull, 
mentioned as early as 1 2 11 . 



INTRODUCTION. 9 

Sayer 3rd succeeded about 1250. 

Sayer 4th succeeded about 1270.* 

John de Sutton, senior, 1289. 

John de Sutton, junior, 1339. 

Thomas, the brother of John, 1356. He died between 
1 38 1 and 1389, when his daughters, Constance 
Margery, and Agnes, divided his manors and 
lands. 

The berewic was acquired from the College of St. John 
at an early date, on the nominal rent of one pepper corn, 
by the family of de Melsa, or Meaux, living at Bewick, in 
Aldboro. They held it until, in 1377, John de Meaux, the 
last male, died, and his sister Alice, who married Sir Ralf 
de Hastings, succeeded. Then the berewic passed into a 
family whose prominence in those times was very likely 
to be fatal. The grandson of Sir Ralf and Alice was Sir 
William de Hastings — created a baron — the Chamberlain 
and friend of Edward IV., with whom he landed at Raven- 
spur in 1 47 1, and on whose death Hastings was promptly 
executed by order of Richard HI. In his will he mentions 
his "manor'* of Sutton, and afterwards we hear no more of 
a berewic. It is a pity that the lords of manor and berewic 
never quarrelled, for else we should have learned more about 
them and their lands. 

Sayer de Sutton the second, the first and last man of real 
mark in the family. Bailiff to the King for the port at the 
river's mouth, a strong, high-handed man, always struggling 

* A deed quoted herein is evidence that the date of 1289, given in 
Frost's *' Notices," is erroneous. 



lO EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

with his neighbours or his superiors, often in the right, 
paying the penalty when in the wrong, was a commanding 
influence over East Hull in the early years of Henry III. 
He was a drainer of marshes, and it seems probable that he 
caused the cutting of Summergangs Dyke, which forms the 
boundary between Sutton and modern Drypod-with-South- 
coates. These last originally lay wholly in the parish of Swine. 
There was a berewic in ancient Dripole, and another in 
Sotcote — he and his successors held the latter under the 
Archbishop^s College of St. John of Beverley. But they held 
a very large portion of ancient Dripole as a manor dependent 
on their Manor of Sutton. This may have been the Dripole 
berewic, or the result of some arrangement with the Arch- 
bishop. In dealing with the districts of East Hull I shall 
begin with this portion. 



DRIPOLE, IN THE PARISH OF SUTTON. II 



DRIPOLE, IN THE PARISH OF SUTTON. 

The Groves in ancient Dripole. — Blockhouse Lane. — Summerg^ang"s 
Dike. — The Fortifications. — High Road to Sutton. — Lime Street. — 
The Brick-Kilns. — Sug"ar House and the Thorntons. — The Spyvees. 
— Sutton Drain. — Quakers* Burial Ground. — Dry pool Field. — Mag*- 
nusdaile. — The Clow Dike. — Burial Ground at the Outhouses. 

Ancient Dripole included the Groves. When, in 1302, 
the road from Hull into Holderness was made a public high- 
way, it was said to pass first ** through the middle of the 
town of Dripole to Suttcoats Som'gang." This accurately 
describes the course of the thoroughfare, which divided tbc 
nortliem part of Dnpole from the rest. While the fortifica- 
tions of Henry VIII,, along the east side of the Old Harbour 
still remained, the North Block House stood right in front 
of the North Bridge, so that the traffic had to go partly 
round it, and along the short piece of road formerly called 
Bridge-Foot. Beyond this, in the seventeenth century, and 
later, was Block House Lane, now called Witham, a country 
road between grass fields, with only such agricultural 
buildings as usually went with such land. At the further 
end of this wide thoroughfare the great open Common of 
Summergangs stretched out right and left. Block House Mill 
standing near the corner of it, opposite the centre of the 
wide road. 

Summergangs Dike, which defined the west side ot 
Dansom Lane and part of Naylor*s Row, curved round to 



12 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

its outlet at Drypole-gote, near the entrance to Dry pool 
Basin. Between this spot and the North Bridge would be 
the site bought from Sir Thomas de Sutton on which to 
build a tower to defend, the town. The fortifications of 
Henry VIII. took land out of Sutton and Swine, they also 
cut off the end of Summergangs Dike, which got a new 
outlet beyond Dripole Field, half a mile further north. Of 
this there is evidence. Excavations would probably show 
that the lower course of the dike 4iad been subject to the 
tide, much of the land being w^«te. As the history of 
the ancient and modern fortifications is well known, chiefly 
through the researches of Mr. E. S. Wilson, F.S.A.,* I need 
only refer to the condition of the adjacent lands, quoting, 
chiefly from Wills at York, from the *'East Riding Registry," 
and from private documents kindly shown to me. 

. In 1659, Joseph Blaides left to his son William a close, 
adjoining unto the Block House, containing twelve acres in 
Drypoole.-}" His descendants had ten acres there, with 
three tenements. In 1709, Mrs. Ann Watson convey-ed to 
Alderman Collings Block House Close, of six acres, on the 
south side of Block House Lane. Captain Phillip's map 
of 1720 shews a stable of Alderman Collings*, where now 

• " Statement as to the Title to the Citadel and Fortifications of King-s- 
ton-upon-Hufl.'* And see also a very interesting paper on " The Castle 
of Kingston-upon-Hull," by Mr. Joseph H. Hirst, M.S. A., in the Tran- 
sactions of the East Riding* Antiquarian Society. 

t The name of Block House Lane seemed to cling ^o the locality. 
In Baines' Directory, of 1823, the map applies it to Naylor's Row. A 
Sugar House conveyance, of 1825, mentions, I think in error, ** Lime 
Street, formerly called Block House Lane." 



I I 
1 ? 



J J 



I 




DRIPOLE, IN THE PARISH OF SUTTON. 1 3 

runs Great Union Street. This street was laid out in 1801, 
when the North Block House was removed, but there was 
previously there a way into Drypool. In 1744, William 
Burton, of Hotham, the heir to his great uncle, Christopher 
Gunby, sold to John Jones, house carpenter, and Thomas 
Ward, bricklayer, his cottage, with garth of an acre in the 
parish of Sutton, '*at the going in to the town of Drypool, 
from Hull, at the north-west end of the town of Drypool, 
and abutting on the highway which leads from Hull to Dry- 
pool."* In 1768, Thomas Broadley acquired from Matthew 
Henry Witham, together \Yith a share in the manor, land 
near to the North Bridge, and south of ** Bridge-Foot, 
otherwise Witham." I think this new name came from his 
father, Henry Witham, whose aunt, the widow of Thomas 
Dalton, had left her late husband's property in Sutton to her 
own family. From that time building went on over this 
corner of Sutton parish, leaving a large vacant space in the 
centre of it, known as the '* Muck-Garth," and used as such 
without much protest until the Cholera epidemic of 1849. 

There was in Bridge-Foot, probably on both sides, waste 
land of the manor. When buildings sprung up, John 
Collings and others paid rents to the lord. Edward Johnson 
had a way to his lime kiln. Thomas Broadley's purchase 
included houses, shops, and warehouses, let to Robert 
Owing and others. In 1768 Owing demised to Burrill a new 

* A Fine (Trinity Term 8 Wm. III.) in which Christopher and Robert 
Gunby were plaintiffs shews that the family held lands in Sutton, Stone-s 
ferry, Southcoates, and Drypool as early as 1696, but I think the name 
was then somewhat recent. 



14 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

built house and buildings adjoining ground of the Rev. John 
Collings on south and east. 

Early in the eighteenth century, Lime Street was called 
the High Road to Stoneferry and Sutton. It ran close to the 
raised bank of the river, which left a width of some thirty or 
forty yards of grass between bank and stream. The local 
name for this space, covered only at the highest tides, was 
the Growths, or Groves. 

For a quarter of a mile from Bridge-Foot the High 
Road ran past old enclosed lands on the right, that 
extended back in long strips as far as Summergangs 
Dike, where Dansom Lane was afterwards made. The 
Growths along the river, opposite to each plot, belonged 
to the plot. 

In Joseph Osborne's Map of 1668, in the Hull Museum, 
a wooden windmill is shewn near the river, not far from 
the North Bridge. In Captain Philips's Map, of 1720, 
the separate plots on the right of the high road, divided 
by ditches, seem to be carefully indicated. Early in the 
eighteenth century, shipbuilding and seed-crushing, already 
well established on the Sculcoates bank,* were in contempla- 
tion on ** Sutton Side," as it was sometimes called. A rape 
mill, an oyle mill, a warehouse, one good residence, and 
some small farm buildings, already stood near the high 

* Wincolmlee, about which there is an absurd legend of an old 
woman who would "wink and lie," is there. I think the name was 
brought from Wincolmlee, near Newcastle, by Hugh Mason, who owned 
the Charterhouse lands adjoining, or perhaps by one who was connected 
with shipping. 



DRIPOLE, IN THE PARISH OF SUTTON. 1 5 

road to Stoneferry, and the brickmaker was making ready 
for the builder. 

The suburb springing up was called Brick-Kilns. The 
whole district, which was afterwards called the Groves, was 
stHl reckoned to be in the Sutton portion of Drypool. 

At, or close to the entrance to the High Road from Bridge- 
Foot, was a tavern called **The Antigallican," a sign very 
popular in those days of hatred against the French. It was 
pulled down about 1765, before the house next door was 
bought to make the outlet for Sutton Drain, then about to 
be cut.* In 1730, Hannah, the widow of Edward Johnson, 
Grocer, conveyed to her son, William Johnson, **of Brick- 
Kilns, limeburner," her lime-kiln and little garth, lying in 
Brick-Kilns near the River Hull, and near to the North 
Bridge. In 1740 he described it as being between the Sugar 
House and North Bridge. Although one fine lime-tree is 
remembered, and more have been imagined in that locality, 
I am disposed to derive the name of Lime Street from the 
industry then practised there. 

The plot on which the Sugar-House was built consisted 
of six acres of grass, in two closes, that extended along the 
wide part of Witham as far as Dansom Lane. The land 
at the corner of Lime Street and Witham was perhaps not 
included. The plot had belonged to the Johnsons, but, in 1 72 1 , 
passed through the hands of Robert Ellerker, millwright, to 
the executors of Richard Sykes, of whom William Wilber- 

* E.R.R. Conveyance by Thomas Broadley and his tenant, Robert 
Owen, or Owing-, of the adjoining plot to the Commissioners of drainage. 



l6 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

force, senior, was one. In 1726, a rape mill, lately built, and 
two houses faced the high road by the river. But, in 1732, 
Godfrey Thornton, of London, and William Thornton, of Hull, 
sons of John Thornton, a Hull merchant, and brothers-in- 
law of William W^ilberforce, had here their building-S for boil- 
ing, baking, and refining sugar, first illustrated in Gent's 
** History of Hull." In 1752, in the time of their nephew, 
John Thornton, of Clapham, who married Lucy Watson, of 
Hull, a distill house had been lately built, with a double 
refining house. In 1756, William Wilberforce, junior, was 
concerned financially with the Thorntons and Watsons in a 

■ 

piece of land forming the northern part of the Sugar-House 
site, on which a Soap-House with two dwelling houses were 
newly erected. In 1760, this **sope-house with warehouse 
for smelting tallow " was conveyed to John Thornton. The 
soap-house was carried on for many years by Lee and Pead, 
and afterwards by Lee and Cross. 

The Sugar-House was owned in many shares, chiefly by 
the Thorntons, who actually carried on the business to the 
fifth generation, but Watsons and Wilberforces were also 
interested in the property. Fifty years ago there was a 
draw-bridge across Lime Street that had to be raised to let 
a high vehicle pass, also an upper bridge, and men were 
wheeling sacks in long procession. There has been found 
recently a very fine iron chest of the seventeenth century, 
having under the lid an elaborate lock with ten bolts. It was 
in a hole in the brickwork under the old chimney, and may 
have contained the more treasured belongings of the Thorn- 



,.„. 


Chest poind at the Slu/ 


R HOISE. 


Plate of Polished Iron, Piebceo, that Covered the Lock. 







\ > 



DRIPOLE, IN THE PARISH OF SUTTON. 1 7 

tons. A similar chest is in the vestry at Swine. Sugar-baking 
came to an end before the soap-making industry, which was 
carried on till about 1859. 

The third William Wilbcrforce, whose memory is im- 
perishable, imbibed from his near relatives, the Thorntons, 
the principles of religion and philanthropy which he upheld 
with all the energy of his life. But, with the Thorntons, 
those principles were hereditary and inbred. London 
merchants and bankers of the highest standing. Directors 
of the Bank of England, Chairmen of great commercial 
associations, leading authorities on finance, and the trusted 
advisers of Chancellors of the Exchequer, they kept in touch, 
by business and by marriages, with the town from which 
they sprang. Of such were John Thornton, "the philan- 
thropist," whose benefactions were **more than princely," 
Samuel Thornton, who represented Hull in four Parliaments, 
but suffered in a great commercial crisis, John Thornton, 
his son, who took upon himself the inherited burden, Henry 
Thornton — the cousin and closest friend of Wilberforce — 
a man of boundless generosity, and Henry Sykes Thorntdh, 
"a king of men." The threatening ruins that tower over 
Lime Street are their monument. 

One of the houses built by the Thorntons still remains. 
It was probably the residence of Benjamin Pead, soap maker, 
and from 1846 to 1865 was the parsonage of the Rev. John 
Scott, the vicar of St. Mary's. It is a good example of an 
eighteenth century town house. 

The house which the Spyvees leased from the Burtons, 

B 



1 8 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

built before 1690, with its ornamental gables, stood next to 
the soap-house, but has disappeared. Hither John Spyvee 
brought his business of a "roper" from Goole way, becoming 
a Freeman of Hull in 1722, but the burial, in 1718, of a 
** band-maker " at Sutton, seems to suggest an earlier date. 
Hi^ son Samuel, and his grandson Samuel, followed him as 
lessees under the Burto;ns, heirs of the Gunbys, and then the 
chief proprietors here. They had farm buildings at the back, 
also tillage in the Clough Field, and pasturage in Summer- 
gangs. In 1748, the "Greaves, or Groves" in front, 
extending to the river side, were under a short lease to 
Edward Hodgson, whose family was coming into prominence. 
In 1774, Samuel Spyvee, junior, bought the house and rope- 
walk, but Sutton Drain had before then cut off the further 
end of the land on which Pemberton Street was laid out. 
Rope-making was continued by Samuel Spyvee Cooper, but 
the builder was inevitable. There was, to the last, an 
old wooden bridge over the water, not quite reaching the 
eastern bank ; the gap could be temporarily spanned when 
a rope for a deep mine was being made, and the rope would 
then be extended even along Pemberton Street. Spyvee 
Street now commemorates this old family. Their memorials 
are to be found at Drypool Church, which attracted this 
growing neighbourhood until 1844, when it was provided 
with the new Church of St. Mark's in its own parish. 

In 1787, the next plot in Brick Kilns, before owned by 
Idell and by Popple, but then by Hill, was sold by auction 
at the George Inn. It ran back as far as the Quakers' 



DRIPOLE, IN THE PARISH OF SUTTON. I9 

Burial Ground. There were upon it two dwelling-houses 
fronting the high road, and a large building, lately a rape- 
mill, also the Groves by the river, containing 1575 square 
yards. The auctioneer used a sand-glass to time the bids, 
and to demonstrate to buyers the ebbing away of their 
opportunity. By the conditions of sale the highest bidder 
within the running of three half-minute glasses was to be 
the purchaser. The property fetched fifteen hundred and 
sixty pounds. 

Quakers then had their separate burial grounds, the 
burials being registered at the Parisji Churches until they 
kept Registers of their own. This small grave-yard, now 
surrounded by houses, contains three fiat stones, the oldest 
of which commemorates Ant^ Wells, of Hull, Merchant, 
who departed this life on the 28th day of 6th month, 1676. 
In 1678, when the wife of Thomas Richardson, of Wyton, 
was buried there, the Minister of Sutton noted that they 
failed to produce to him an affidavit that she was wrapped 
only in woollen, as the law then required. It had, by 
mistake, been sent to Swine, because Drypool was known 
to be in Swine, and this locality was still called Drypool. 
There are a few entries in the Sutton Registers down to 1679 
of persons buried *'in loco usurpato populo vulgo dicto 
Quakers," and, with grander simplicity, '*in Sepulterio 
Quakerorio. " 

Quakers swarmed about Hull, and were notorious for 
their sufferings. In 1657, when the Quaker, William Elliker, 
a small Sutton farmer, probably living in this neighbour- 



20 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

hood, refused to pay eight shillings and sixpence towards 
the repair of the ** Steeple-House," or Church, the Steeple- 
House officers, with the local constable, Peter Tock, seized 
a bacon-flitch, which was sold for twenty-six shillings, and 
two chines, worth one shilling and sixpence. Still smaller 
men lost calves or pewter dishes, and, after deducting 
expenses, a few coppers would be offered back, which they 
would refuse to touch. This is only a sample. They were 
hauled before the magistrate in Hull, or cudgelled, or turned 
out to a savage mob. Many were sent to York Castle ; 
some died. They were, no doubt, very provoking. When 
they differed with the magistrate they called him a liar to 
his face, and when he was drunk they told him of it straight, 
tightening their hats on their heads. 

In 1767 the adjoining plot to the north, with its groves or 
growths, belonged to Edward Hodgson. In the same year 
the property beyond this, now the Allottment Gardens and 
the Recreation Ground adjoining Dansom Lane, belonged to 
Robert Burton, but the growths by the river had been 
acquired by Hugh Blaydes. In 1818 these were occupied as 
timber yards by Richardson & Wade, John Barkworth, and 
others, which brings us to the modem state of things in this 
locality. 

We now reach a large plot, the history of which goes 
back to remote ages. It was the ancient ploughland of the 
manor, called Dripole Field as lately as 17 10, but which, 
from the new outlet to Summergangs Dike, got the name 
of the Clough Field. It contained only twenty-eight acres. 



DRIPOLE, IN THE PARISH OF SUTTON. 21 

which does not agree with the three oxgangs, or forty-five 
acres, which Sayer de Sutton, the second, held in Dripole, 
nor with the area of the berewic in Dripole as given in 
Domesday.* Perhaps the enclosed lands between it and 
Withani had been carved out of old Dripole Field ; there 
is here great scope for conjecture. Nearly the whole of the 
strips of lands in this tillage field must have belonged to 
Robert Burton, for in 1757 he sold the wide Growths in front 
of it, reserving only the claims of the owners of one broad 
land and one narrow land in the field. What is called a 
Pightle, probably a Toft, that had been nibbled from the 
Clough Field was sold in 1764 to Thomas Hodgson, and is 
now, I think, the site of the Subscription Mill in Dansom 
Lane. In 1767 the Enclosure Award gave the whole field 
to Robert Burton. In the midst of this ancient ploughland 
the truncated spire of St. Mark's Church dominates its 
district of mean streets. 

We know the complete history of Magnusdaile, the 
estate next to the Clough Field during nearly seven hundred 
years. It had been got together bit by bit in the thirteenth 
century, by the Monks of Meaux. They had one piece six 
perches wide, from Robert de Melsa, the owner of the 
berewic, for the health of his soul and the souls of his 
ancestors, but were bound to repair the " Sedik " or river 
bank, along which was a right of way, afterwards the High 
Road. Some of the plots were given to keep up the daily 

• This was three taxable oxgangs, which was probably the same 
land that Sayer afterwards held. 



22 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

alms at the Abbey Gate, some were got in exchanges, some 
they redeemed from mortgages to the Jews at York and 
Lincoln. They were permitted to enclose this estate of 
thirty two acres with bank and ditch. It ran from the river 
to Summergangs dike, and its northern boundary was a 
stream called Gyselfleth. After a hundred years, however, 
they had so neglected its boundaries that the cattle of the 
neighbours roamed over it, but when they began to clear 
out the ditches, the lord of the manor and the free tenants 
made violent resistence. Then all the parties met on the 
spot, the monks shewed their charters, old men gave their 
recollections, and as Sir Thomas de Sutton took their 
part, they were allowed to amend their boundaries. They 
could then let the land at a mark per annum more than 
before. 

At the Dissolution in 1539, Magnusdaile, in Dripole, was 
occupied by Agnes Squyer, at the rent of ;^3 19s. In 1608, 
Peter Orrell, of South Cave, got a lease from James I. for 
forty years, at £2 ^ year, with i6s. for ** increase for the 
price of a sheep." In 1627, his son, Walter, who was living 
there in his own house, sold the remainder of the lease to 
William Popple, described in the conveyance as ** Master 
and Mariner," for one hundred and forty eight pounds. In 
1656, Alderman William Popple held the freehold, and left it 
to his son, Edmund, it being then occupied by Peter Tocke, 
the constable, and Richard Tocke. In 1709, John Idell 
conveyed to Alderman Gray meadow land near Halfpenny 
Gate, "otherwise Maunsdale;*' there was then, perhaps, 



DRIPOLE, IN THE PARISH OF SUTTON. 23 

a toll gate on the High Road. About that time Henry 
Cocke held Magnusdaile. In 1767 this property belonged 
to Richard Hodgson. From him it passed to Howard ; the 
brick making industry having spread over it. It was next 
owned by Mr. Liddle, then the Flax and Cotton Mills, old 
and new, were built upon it, with the workmcn*s dwellings 
in Dansom Lane, called the Lines. Howard Street (now 
Chapman Street) was run through it, and the Groves got 
the kind of populatiqp, and put on the appearance of a 
Lancashire town. 

Before the middle of the seventeenth century, the drain, 
to take the water from Summergangs Dike, had been cut 
between Old Dripole Field and Magnusdaile, with a clough, 
shown in Osborne's map, and this gave rise to the new 
name of the Clough Field. The estate of the Monks has 
been commemorated in old documents under such names 
as Maunsda^e, Mansdell, and Moundscale ; Mounsdale Drain 
may still be traced. It is mentioned in presentments by the 
jury of the middle Bayliwicke of Holderness in 1708, when 
the owners and occupiers of Summergangs were amerced in 
five pounds for default in the Clow Dike. 

Somewhere along the High Road to Stoneferry, at, or 
near Magnusdaile, was the Outhouses. Richard Tocke, 
tenant to Alderman Popple, was living, as the Parish 
Register says, at the **Oute houssiss." Here was another 
burial-place, several times mentioned in the Register. It 
is sometimes called, rightly or wrongly, a " burning" place ; 
some traces of it ought to be found in excavations, not far 



24 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

beyond the Sculcoates Bridge. I think that Gyselfleth, 
north of Magnusdaile, was the boundary of ancient Dripole. 
At some little distance beyond the boundary the footway to 
Sutton struck off from the High Road across the Ings, .where 
it still runs by Thistleton. 



HULL, IN THE MANOR OF SUTTON. 25 



HULL, IN THE MANOR OF SUTTON. 

Evidences of an older Hull. — The Port and River. — The Ings. — The 
Meadows of Sutton and of Hull and of Dripole. — A Writ of Dower. 
— The Reeve of Hull. — Grant of Bondsmen. — Meaux Abbey and 
Wyke with Myton.—The Ville de Hull.— Sayer, the Kings BaillflF. 
Roads to Stoneferry, 

Beyond Magnusdaile, a belt of land close to the river 
bank was an old enclosure, behind which were the open 
meadows of the Ings. The way in which some, at least, 
of this river-side land became enclosed seems to be shown 
by two charters (Stowe, Nos. 484 and 485), in the British 
Museum. By these, Sayer the Third granted to the Nuns 
of Swine thirty acres of land, measured by the perch of 
eighteen ^feet, between the closes formerly belonging to 
Amandus de Watton and Simon Scott, of Hull, extending 
from the meadows of Sutton to the river, with common of 
pasture for their cattle after the hay and corn harvest until 
the middle of March. The large close that measured thirty 
acres and a half, on which the Hull Glass Works stood, 
and which Earless Cement Works now occupy, answers this 
description, lying, as it does, north of Magnusdaile, part of 
which had been the property of William de Watton. The 
Charter, No. 487, grants twenty one acres of land in the 
meadows of Sutton, extending from the common pasture of 
Summergang as far as the arable land by the river. 

The enclosed lands beyond the thirty-acre close, towards 



26 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

Stoneferry, were the South Field, the Little Field, and the 
**Intack," a name that suggests its enclosure. They were 
sold to Mr. Thomas Broadley, by the last representatives 
of that branch of the Daltons which acquired the third 
part of the manor, called Boomer's, or Bulmer's, from the 
descendants of Agnes, daughter of Sir Thomas de 
Sutton. 

The Ings were, in general, called the Meadows of Sutton, 
but, on account of their extent, they had many distinctive 
local names, a portion near the river beyond Magnusdaile 
being known as the Meadows of Hull. 

There is a Charter (Stowe, 486), by which Sayer the 
Third granted important rights-of-way to the Nuns of Swine, 
who had large and growing interests in Dripole. One of 
these ran along the present footway, leading from Sutton 
towards Kingston -upon -Hull. Sayer grants to the nuns 
that, with their men riding or going, they may use the 
path which reaches from Sutton as far as Dripole, ** through 
the meadows of Sutton and of Hull and of Dripole as the 
men of Sutton and Dripole now use it. " This is an exact 
description of the path, as shown on the old map of Sutton, 
which represents the allotments in the common fields at the 
Enclosure of 1767. It is not known that Sayer had any 
lands on the west side of the river, and, if he had, we 
cannot conceive why the men of Sutton, or the nuns, should 
desire to go from Sutton to Dripole by the way of Wike, 
or Myton, or the ** Hull" which grew up on their sites. 
I place this evidence first, because it throws light on many 



HULL, IN THE MANOR OF SUTTON. 2J 

documents of older and later dates. Sayer the Second had 
leased to Thornton Abbey, in 12 17, for twelve years and 
three months, pasturage for 616 sheep, at six score to the 
hundred, in the fields and marshes of Sutton, Hull, Sote* 
cotes, and Dripole, with free entrance and exit between 
Hull and Wilflete. That is, I submit, all over his lands 
between the River Hull and the limits of his manors at 
Marfleet. 

The application of the name "Hull" to these meadows 
may more clearly be inferred from a singular grant (Dods- 
worth, 94. f. 90), made by Sayer the Fourth, immediately 
on succeeding to the manors. His father, Sayer the Third, 
who died about 1270, having left, we must suppose, no 
special provision for Joan, his widow, she impleaded in 
the Court of the King, before the Justices of the Bench, 
by a Writ of Dower, called from its commencing words, 
"Unde nihil habet," certain persons who had held lands 
and tenements from her husband. They included Arch- 
bishop Walter Giifard, Isabella de Fortibus, then the 
widowed Countess of Albemarle, Richard, Abbot of Meaux, 
and Matilda, Prioress for Swine. These, appearing before 
the Justices in the Octave of St. Hilary, 55th Henry 3rd, 
drew in Sayer, the son, as heir, who, as he says, "to avoid 
costs and labours and grievances," granted to his mother, 
on Thursday next before the Feast of St. Matthew, in 
the Chapel of Sutton, a sufficient dower, including the 
following items : — 

** The Manor of Sottecotes with its liberties, easements, 



28 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

and other appurtenances, his entire holding in Drypol, with 
all its liberties, easements, gates, customs, and other appur- 
tenances, eighty acres of meadow with their appurtenances, 
in Villis de Sutton et Hull, with which she had already been 
dowered by the Bailiffs of the Countess of Albemarle. " And 
also ''William the Reeve {propositus), of Hull, with all his 
holding, all his family and chattels." I do not suppose that 
the **Ville de Hull" then meant more than the cottages 
which accommodated the herdsmen whom William super- 
vised, with, posisibly, a few serfs or labourers employed 
about the bank of the river. At any rate, the dower granted 
would be in his manor, and not in the Hull which sprung 
up at or near Wike or Myton. 

Again, Sayer, **the son of Sayer " (who was probably the 
fourth), granted to Robert de Hildyard, common in Sutton 
and Hull, as much as belonged to an oxgang of tillage. 
Tillage and pasturage would be in his manor. At the 
inquest on the death of Sayer the Fourth, in 1289, the 
manor of Sutton is mentioned, together with the manors 
of Ganstead and Hull, but nothing is known of his holding 
a manor of Hull other than this. 

These charters throw light on an older document (B. M. 
Lansd., 194), by which Stephen, son of Ralph de Sutton, 
a descendant of former lords, grants, for the health of his 
soul and the souls of all his ancestors, to God, and to the 
Altar of St. John of Beverley, his bondsmen, John, Henry, 
and Roger, sons of Richard, son of Robert of Hull, with 
all their children then born, or in future to be born. Unless 



HULL, IN THE MANOR OF SUTTON. 29 

it can be shown that the lords of Sutton had also a manor 
on, or near the site which Edward I. obtained from the 
Monks of Meaux, we must, I think, read all the ordinary 
references to Hull with Sutton of this early date, as applying^ 
to the Hull which was a member of the manor of Sutton. 
And when, in 1269, Joana de Stoteville refers to her men 
of Hull, they must have been men in her manor of Cotting- 
ham, who lived by the river side. 

I am not concerned in questions as to the sites of Wyke 
and Myton, but I do not understand how, if the name of 
Hull was in use before 1278 for the growing town on, or 
near to the site which Edward I. afterwards acquired from 
the Monks of Mealix, the Monks should, in that year, be 
petitioning for a market and fair at the same spot, under 
the name of Wyke, near Myton, on the Hull ; nor is it 
likely that, with such a gold-mine actually within their 
grasp, they should have mortgaged their estate here for a 
trivial sum, thus inviting a loss which they must have 
foreseen. Nor can one imagine such a commerce as 
Frost mentions in his Notices, existing upon a site 
that, as yet, had no Municipal Government and no 
public means of approach by road, and which failed 
to be clearly described in any independent documents 
relating to this locality. 

I suggest that the commerce, whether by the Hull or by 
the Humber, was carried on by transhipment between sea- 
going ships and river barges, in the harbour or haven, from the 
chain fixed across the river's mouth to the chain at Stanford- 



30 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

Rak, or Stoneferry, these being the two limits of the port. 
In respect of such traffc, the **Ville de Hull" means the 
Port on the Hull. Such an arrangement rendered necessary 
the appointment of Sayer the Second as the Bailiff of the 
river, until the king saw the advantage of a regularly con- 
stituted town at the river's mouth, which would put an end 
to the ill-regulated commerce along the stream.* 

Sayer the Second, though deprived, for his misdeeds, of 
the control of the traffic, retained his ancient rights over the 
stream. In 1269, his son, Sayer the Third, gave up to 
Archbishop Walter Giffard, his rights of making weirs in 
the water of Hull, or any other obstacle to ships and boats, 
between the Humber and Beverley. This date is fixed by 
a similar grant of Joanna de Estouteville in respect of her 
manor of Cottingham ; John de Oketon being one of the 
witnesses to each charter. 

From the railway bridge at Wilmington may still be traced 
on the grass, after a light fall of snow, the High Road to Stone- 
ferry. When the Holderness Road and the Ings Road to Sutton 
superseded the High Road by the river, Stoneferry was, for 
wheel-traffic, practically cut off from Hull. Sixty years ago, 
the existing road beyond Wilmington was a private way to 

* These views as to an older Hull I first suggested in a paper on 
** Hull and Dripole in the 13th Century," in the Transactions of the East 
Riding Antiquarian Society. The "Notices relative to the Early History 
of the Town and Port of Hull " is a splendid testimony to the learning 
and industry of its author. But I am satisfied that Mr. Frost was mis 
taken as to the existence of an earlier Hull upon the site of Kyngeston 
upon Hull. Much of his evidence consists of disputes over a commerce 
extending up the river even to Beverley. 



{ 




Town of Stoneferry 



HULL, IN THE MANOR OF SUTTON. 3 1 

farm lands, axle-deep in mud, with an unlighted footway, 
along which women walked in pattens. The keeper of the 
Holderness toll-bar would stroll round to see if he could 
catch any unauthorised person driving that way to Hull to 
escape the toll. 



32 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 



STONEFERRY. 

Stanford Rak? — Ankedam. — Antholme Dike. — Leads road, bridge, and 
common. — The White House a Manor House. — Cardinal Wolsey. — 
Henry VHI. — Constable, Watson, Truslove, and Broadley, — Ann 
Watson's College. — Spinning. — Katherine Hillyard. — Lopholme 
Hamlet. 

Stanferry, Staynfery, Stanefery, or Stoneferrye, may be 
one of the places made dry by the Embankments, or it may 
have been one of the small holms always just clear of the 
tides. I assume it is the same as Stanford-Rak, where, before 
1269, Johanna de Stuteville of Cottingham and her predeces- 
sors put a chain across the river at night. At that time it was 
the place nearest the Humber where road traffic crossed the 
river and it must then have been a place of some importance. 
The derivation of the name from * * Sutton-ferry " is plaus- 
able, but it is more allied to Stanmar or Stainmar, the sheet 
of water that once lay over a great part of Summergangs 
and Sutton Ings. It was perhaps a stone or paved ford. 

It was a hamlet of small farms with one site that may 
have been anciently occupied by a residence or a farm of 
the Lords of the Manor. This is close to the ancient ferry 
and landing place and to Stoneferry Clough ; the enclosure 
map of 1767, shows that the paddock between the existing 
farmstead and the town street was part of the village Green. 
Its traditional name is the Green garth. 

In the reign of Richard II. a third part of the manor with 



STONEFERRY. 33 

its fishery was conveyed from Thomas Ughtred to Sir Ralph 
Hastings, together with **The Ferry of the Water of Hull " 
then let to William Bulfyne. 

Stoneferry Clough is the most ancient outlet for water 
from the meadows of Sutton ; it took drainage even from 
Wawne. The old channel still crosses the fields from near 
'Tween dikes-lane to Stoneferry-town street, where it widens 
towards the Clough. The ancient name was Ankedam, 
but in very early times a * Leda ' or canal was cut 
along the side of the road^ from Sutton. This is called 
in the Enclosure Award, Antholme-dike. Between these 
two channels was a long narrow Common, called in 
old charters the **Lede" or **le led"; some adjoining 
meadows in the Ings were called Ledeholmdaile. At the 
Enclosure it was called Leads Common. Both the dikes 
were solemnly fished by owners of shares in the manor in 
order to keep up their rights. They divided the dikes into 
sections. As late as 1774, after the Enclosure, a con- 
veyance from Wadman to Frost of the Hastings berewic, 
includes **one fishery in the middle set in the Lea Dike and 
also one set in the upper end of New Lea Dike. *' The old 
name for the road from Stoneferry to Sutton is Leads Road, 
and the Bridge over Sutton Drain is Leads Bridge. Such 
is the persistency of old names. 

After the partition of the manor between the three daugh- 
ters of Sir Thomas de Sutton the chief house of the successors 
of Constance, the eldest, must I think have been upon the 
site by the old ferry which I have indicated. They let it to 



34 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

tenants with the manorial rights. Her third share in the 
manor and lands was bought in 1527, of Robert Ughtred by 
Cardinal Wolsey, some little time before his disgrace, as 
part of the endowment of his new College at Oxford. In 
1529 it was confiscated by Henry VIII., who in 1535 granted 
it to Sir Marmaduke Constable. In 1554 the lessee was 
Stephen Hogge of a Southcoates family. He lived at 
Stoneferry and left to his wife and children his part of the 
manor of Sutton which he held from Sir Marmaduke Con- 
stable, and his ,two parts of the house in which he lived. 

« 

In 1649, this share in the manor was held by Sir Philip 

Constable, Bart., who calls himself ** a third lord in Sutton *' ; 

his rental here stood thus — 

Rent- 
Capons. 

Thomas Hay of Stoneferry... 02. 13. 04. 2 

John Cross ... ... ... 10. 01. 08. 2 

William Watson ... ... 01. 14. 08. 2 

Steven Snaith ... ... 02. 00. 00. 2 



16. 09. 08. 



The capons are the last remnants of the ancient ** ser- 
vices " which in feudal times a tenant had to render to his 
lord. Apart from them his manorial rights seem to have 
been of no substantial value. The lands lay intermixed all 
over the Parish, so that the rental of Stoneferry cannot be 
separated from that of Sutton. 

In March 1552-3, Sir Philip Constable's estates having 
been forfeited for treason against the Commonwealth, a 



STONEFERRY. ^ 35 

survey and valuation was made. (Rentals and Surveys, 
Domestic, Interregnum, E. 58, Folio 182 b.), in which 
Constable's third share in a cottage and a ninth part of the 
manor stood at six shillings and eightpence a year. Among 
the tenants was Mr. Thomas Watson, the prefix to whose 
name shews that he was of more consequence than his 
small rent of forty shillings for Constable's third share 
would indicate. His father, Mr. Thomas Watson, and 
his mother had lived at Stoneferry, though they were 
probably from Drypool ; their wills shew no signs of 
wealth. 

I am not sure that he can be identified with the Thomas 
Watson whose half-penny token dated 1668 and bearing the 
arms of the Tallowchandlers' Company, is in the Municipal 
Museum, but he was probably a prosperous merchant in 
Hull. The Town Clerk, Charles Vaux, Steward of the 
Manor of Sutton, was his friend and executor. Before 
his death in 1665, he had acquired the forfeited estates of 
Sir Philip Constable in Sutton and Stoneferry and seems to 
have added thereto. He lived at the White House on the 
site I have described. His property was chiefly settled by 
Deed and by Will on his widow for her life, some of it with- 
out any devise of the remainder, of which his sister Elizabeth^ 
the wife of John Truslove of Wawne and Stoneferry, got a 
considerable share as "shift-lands," besides what she had 
under his will. From her descendants Mr. Thomas Broadley 
bought a portion called Whitehouse farm, the rest of her 
property being acquired by Mrs. Ann Watson who lived at 



36 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

White House, and, dying in 1721, founded in that house her 
College for widows and maiden daughters of clergymen. 

Mrs. Ann Watson's will furnishes incidentally many 
interesting particulars as to her house and lands, and other 
possessions. She left amongst her friends her plain gold 
ring, with a **posie" or motto in it, her gold ring without 
a posie, her clothes of woollen, linen, and silk, and a pair of 
silver candlesticks and snuffers. Her heirlooms and pictures 
in her house were to be continued ther« for ever for orna- 
ments and benefits to the house. Her house, called White 
House, the north end of cow-house, and the close it stood in, 
were for ever to be appropriated to a college or dwelling for 
clergymen's widows and clergymen's daughters, old maids, 
and for a school for teaching children. 

. Ten girls, who could read, were to be taught by the 
school dame to knit, spin, and sew. The girls were to be 
the children of poor inhabitants in need of such assistance, 
and were to help the ladies in their domestic affairs, and each 
was to receive twopence per week. The children were to go 
to Sutton Church on St. James' Day, and every Sunday when 
there should be service and sermon, and to be catechised 
when there should be catechising. The minister of Sutton 
was to have five pounds for the service and sermon on 
St. James' Day. The school dame was to read prayers on 
Wednesdays and Fridays. Each of the inmates was to 
receive five pounds per annum, the school dame being paid 
five pounds more. 

When a new College or Hospital was provided at Stoneferry, 



Old Uprjuht Spinning Whrbl. 



STONEFERRY. 37 

the White House was used as a farm. In the time of my 
grandfather, Samuel Hudson,* who succeeded his father there 
it was a spacious Manor house, having a carved oak staircase 
and large rooms that had been divided to accommodate the 
former residents. 

The house was taken down when a new house was built 
some seventy-five years ago. The small portion now 
remaining consists of a low room with a chamber over ; the 
floor of the chamber is carried on a beam and joists, all 
bearing a good moulding on the angles. There was origin- 
ally a wide fireplace, but within the opening a more modern 
fireplace has been constructed. It may be that this was done 
by Mrs, Watson, or even by the Trusloves' or Thomas 
Watson. The floor-timbers and the wide fireplace look as 
old as the time of Stephen Hogge. i* 

The Rev. J. H. Bromby, Vicar of Hull, remembered the 
ladies being carried to Sutton Church, as Ann Watson had 
provided, riding on pillions behind the tenants. Until the 
direct road from Hull was made, Stoneferry had much 
of the quaint tranquility of a Dutch village. But until the 
drain was cut there was not always access to Sutton. In 
1589 and in 1637 Stoneferry children had to be baptized at 
Dry pool because of the floods over the Leads Road. 

The student of Field names may find near the city boun- 

* This name, which appears in lists of occupiers from the sixteenth 
century, is now extinct. 

t The implements tor spinning, measuring, and hanking flax, here 
illustrated, are part of those used at that house until 1829 by my grand- 
mother and her daughters. 



38 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

dary some interesting items. Meadows and pasturage that 
Isabella, Countess of Albermarle, had held under the lords 
of Sutton, were held in 1296 by Robert de Hillyard, lately 
her bailiff. They descended to the two daughters of Thomas 
de Hillyard of Riston, about whose wardship and marriage 
there is an interesting dispute recorded in the Chronicle of 
Meaux Abbey. Katherine, who married Peter de Nuttle of 
Burstwiok, parted with her life interest, settling the reversion 
on her son (Dods. 139. f. 45. b.), in whose family the pro- 
perty descended. By the river, just beyond the World's 
End farm, are two fields called High and Low Nuttles, which 
commemorate this piece of family history. Early in the 
fifteenth century, there was near Stoneferry a hamlet called 
Lopholme, mentioned in the manuscript record at York 
Minster of a great case about burials in Sutton. Out on 
the margin of the West Carr are a couple of fields still 
called Loppam, where marks of foundations are all that 
remain of this deserted hamlet. Part of the property of 
the Carthusian Monastry near Hull was here, and families 
called Lopholme, Lopham, and Loppam, lingered long among 
the small farmers of Stoneferry. 

In 17 17 Mary Peacock conveyed to Thomas Mould a Garth 
where a cottage formerly stood, with half a steng (or rood), 
formerly called Guy me Coat (an enclosure for sheep), abutting 
on Guyme Close on the west and on Stoneferry West Carr 
on the north. Guyme Close would be by the river, north 
of Stoneferry : the name commemorates a Gime, or breach in 
the bank. The Moulds were a family of merchants in Hull. 



THE WEST CARR AND SUTTON INGS, 39 



THE WEST CARR AND SUTTON INGS. 

The Monks of Meaux. — Dudley, Duke of Northumberland. — The Earl 
of Leicester. — The Stainmar. — Sutton Drain. — Hedon-croft. — Swine 
Lathes. — Countess Croft. 

The West Carr, a great sheep pasture, Sutton Ings, a 
great meadow and the pasture of Summergangs in South- 
coates, were all under the same lord of the manor, and were 
occupied to some extent by the same tenants. The sheep and 
cattle lived in winter on the meadow ground and in summer 
on the pastures. The chronicle of Meaux Abbey is largely 
occupied with the early and persist^nf *! struggles of the 
Monks to acquire shares in the newly reclaimed meadows 
and pasturage from the lords of the manor, and from the 
free tenants whose ancient farms were perhaps already large 
enough for them. The success of the monks was remarkable 
and, through their trade in wool, they ought to have grown 
richer than they did. At the dissolution of the monastry 
in. 1539, the Crown seized this property, letting it with 
Meaux Abbey, on leases for lives to the family of Alford, and 
later, granting the rents from these leases to John Dudley, 
Duke of Northumberland and to his son, Robert Dudley, 
Earl of Leicester until it again reverted to the Crown. These 
rentals were afterwards settled upon successive Queens- 
Consort. 

The municipal boundary includes part of the Ings which 
were divided into ** dailes " or allotments, several transactions 



40 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

in which between the lords of the manor, the Nuns ot 
Swine, and others, are recorded in the Stowe Charters. The 
Marr or Lake, which had covered much of this g-round, was 
commemorated among-st the dailes by such names as Stayn- 
mar and East and West Stanmardaile ; Robert de Stanernia 
seems to have written many of the Charters. 

Sutton Drain, made through the Ings about 1765, g-reatly 
to the improvement of all the low lands over a wide area, 
was the outcome of long* consideration. In 1677 a Com- 
mittee of the Corporation had reported against a scheme 
for carrying such a drain to Malmesdale Clough, thinking 
that a better outfall could be g'ot into the Humber between 
Drypool and Marfleet, which idea has since been carried out. 
A proposition was seriously entertained as recently as 1786, 
to make Sutton drain into a navigable canal, with Locks 
and Wharves for the carriage of corn and manure and goods ; 
the roads being excessively rough and hazardous. There 
were then no light carts, and farmers' wagons frequently 
broke down, even on turnpike roads. 

The railway to Hornsea, after crossing Sutton dra}n, 
enters upon an Enclosure more ancient than Summergangs 
dike, for the dike was carried half round it so as to in- 
clude it in Sutton. It was the largest of the sheepfolds which 
were necessary adjuncts to pasturage in Summergangs and 
meadow in the Ings. There were probably more sheepfolds 
than one here. One of its three divisions is called Lang'croft, 
an old name, the largest is Hedon-croft, probably so called 
from Hedun de Hedun, who in 1217 held meadow in the Ings. 



THE WEST CARR AND SUTTON INGS. 4 1 

By a charter (B.M. L.F.C. VIII.), Sayer the third granted 
to the Nuns of Swine, the site of that sheepfold in the 
**cultura" that lies next to the cultura called Hedon-crofte, 
**just as.it is bounded by the dikes." These would be 
meadows, for the term is used of meadows in similar char- 
ters. Also before 1260 Sayer granted to the Nuns (Stowe 
487) eighteen and a half acres next Hedon-croftes, near to 
their sheepfold. He warranted this against his lord, the 
last William de Fortibus, Earl of Albemarle, who died in 
1260 At the dissolution in 1540, the property of the Nuns 
was granted to Sir Richard Gresham, then to Sir John 
Constable and passed to the Alureds. 

In 1731 and 1734 (E.R.R.) conveyances were made of 
a bercaria or sheep-coate called Swine Lathes, and two 
closes containing eighteen acres, formerly the lands of John 
Alured. The lathes would be store places and shelters for 
sheep. 

In the Ings, close to the Summergangs dike, a little west 
of Hull East Park, is a field of old enclosure called Countess 
Croft. Sayer the third, or his son granted to Isabella, 
Countess of Albemarle, widow of William de Fortibus, by 
a charter (Dodsworth, 94), with 120 acres of meadow in 
Sutton, pasturage for a thousand sheep in Sottecoates, Dry- 
pool, and Sutton. This was no doubt, her sheepfold, and 
we see by such evidences the persistency of old dikes and 
old names. 



42 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 



SOUTHCOATES. 

The Domesday Survey. — Chapel of St. Mary. — Sir John de Sutton. — 
Riots on his Manors. — The Holdemess Road. — The open Fields. — 
The Ewelands. — The Chimney lands. — The Manor Courts. — Fines 
and Disputes. — "Nobles" of pasturage. — Sir Philip Constable. — 
John Dalton. — Enclosure of open fields. — Holdemess House. — The 
Holdemess Road fifty years ago. 

At the time of the Domesday Survey, about 1086, Sotcote 
and Dridpol had in the manor or manors thirteen taxable 
oxgangs. It was then waste, but in the time of Edward the 
Confessor its annual value had been thirty shillings. The 
College of St. John of Beverley had in Sotcote a berewic of 
one carucate or eight oxgangs, and in Dritpol three oxgangs 
with soke upon five. All this was tillage, amounting to 195 
acres in the manor and 240 acres in the berewic. This also 
was then waste. But if the third part of the ploughland, 
which must lie in fallow each year, went untaxed and unre- 
corded, this sum of 435 acres represented a total of 652 acres 
of tillage, besides meadow and pasturage, of which nothing 
is told. The total area of the combined townships is now 
1 48 1 acres. 

The interest of the lords of the Manor of Sutton in South- 
coates, led to the foundation of a Chapel there, subject to the 
rights of the Church or Chapel of Drypole which was under 
Swine. In 1236, a dispute between Sibil Prioress of Swine 
and Sayer the second, who complained that she had deforced 
him from the advowson of the Church of Dripole, was settled 



SOUTHCOATES. 43 

by a Fine in which he quit-claimed to her this right. In 
return she agreed that the nunnery should find a chaplain, 
with clerk, books, vestments, light, and all requisites for a 
chantry in the chapel at Ganstead, also that he should have 
a free chantry in Southcoates, as he had before, at his own 
charges, saving harmless the Church of Dripole. 

In 1327, Sir John de Sutton senior had licence in Mort- 
main to alienate three messuages and land, with pasture for 
two horses, four oxen, and two hundred sheep, in Sotcotes, 
to a Chaplain to celebrate divine service daily in the chapel 
of St. Mary at Sotcotes, for the souls of himself and his 
ancestors. Some of the charters of Sir John de Sutton are 
dated at Sudcoats, having, no doubt, been sealed at the 
Chapel of St. Mary, the site of which might perhaps be found 
among the farms, or at Mile-house, where the Holderness 
Road turns as if to avoid some pre-existing obstacle. A 
list of the chantry priests is given by Poulson. 

The natural overflow from the Stainmar would be at 
Marfleet, but, in the constant efforts to improve the drainage, 
the Humber and the Hull have by turns taken these low- 
land waters. Summergangs-dike, which was cut for this 
purpose, divides Sutton from Southcoates and Drypool. It 
has been called ** Gouts "-dike, corrupted to Gold-dyke, from 
the French igout — a sewer. 

The Patent roll of the ist Edward II (part 2.m, 4. d., 1308) 
reveals some of the troubles of the lord of the manor. John 
de Sutton senior, complained that certain named persons had 
distrained and impounded his cattle, killing several, and a 



44 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

Commission was issued with orders to deal with the male- 
factors. Again in the ist Edward III (part 3.m. 24. d.) a 
long list was presented of rioters who, at Drypole, had 
beaten and wounded John the son of the lord of the manor 
to the peril of his life. These also with others had entered 
the Free Warren of John de Sutton senior, at Sotcotes, 
Sutton, and Drypole, hunting hares and rabbits, and beating 
and wounding his servants. 

Summergangs, always a pasture, dotted and seamed all 
over with ponds, and sikes and watery hollows, was of 
very fluctuating value. The charter by which Hull acquired 
one-sixth of the manorial rights, shews that in the reign of 
Henry VIII, the full annual value of three commons, each 
being for eighty sheep and four horses, was thirteen shillings 
and four pence. Its history in the reign of Elizabeth is 
chiefly contained in the Rolls of the Manor Courts which I 
shall quote, but in a survey made in 1674, when the Crown 
lease of the Meaux Abbey pasturage was held under 
Catherine the Queen of Charles II, four hundred sheep-gates 
were nearly overlooked because, for many years, sheep had 
not been turned in, as the profit would not have been enough 
to pay the highway rate. The suggestion that the name 
comes from So*mer-gangs would be more convincing of 
the name if the ancient lake had been the South Mere, but 
there is no evidence of this. It was a pasture, only used in 
summer and, on account of its wetness, not always in that 
season. 

In my book upon Sutton I have shewn how this grazing 



SOUTHCOATES. 45 

for 400 sheep in Summergangs, with pasturage for the lambs 
in tlie Ings **in the season of separation," was granted by 
Sayer de Sutton 3rd to Martin de Otringham, Knight, a 
burgess of Hedon, and given to Meaux Abbey by his grand- 
son Richard, a priest. After the Dissolution it was included 
in the leases to the Alfords of Meaux Abbey. The Prioress 
of Swine had here pasturage for 500 sheep and all other 
cattle except pigs. This was worth 26s. 8d. per annum at 
the Dissolution, and was sold in 1557 to Sir John Constable 
and his son. 

In 1637, Margaret Bell alias Stalker, a servant, died 
of the plague which she got at Hull. She lies buried in the 
Summergangs. 

The Holderness Road, made for public access to Hull, 
was not precisely new ; it followed the old line of one of the 
rights of way granted by Sayer the third to the Nuns of 
Swine. His charter (Stowe 485) gave them freeway for 
carts and wains, men, horses, and other animals from the 
bridge of Bilton, through the midst of the meadow of Sutton 
as far as Summergang-dike, and through the pasture of 
Summergangs as far as Dripole and Sotecotes and to their 
sheepfolds. In 1302, in the time of John de Sutton, the 
grandson of Sayer, the King took, without payment, the 
meadow and pasture along this track, for laying out the road 
into Holderness. It passed "through the middle of the town 
of Dripole to Suttecoates Som'gang," (at Dansom Lane), 
thence to the cross in Somergangs, (the position of which 
is lost), thence to the west end of the town of Sutcotes, (near 



46 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

Mile-house), and thence to Lambhelmsike — where Summer- 
gangs-dike is now crossed by the road. It may be that the 
omission to pay for the land was due to its being an old 
private road. In the great floods of 1764, the whole land 
between Bilton and Hull was under water, so deep that the 
turnpike houses were deserted, and there was no travelling 
along the road **from January 6th to the ist day of April, 
except in a boat. One man and horse, attempting to go 
through, were drowned."* About 181 3, Isabel Richardson, 
who kept house for her cousin, Thomas Priestman, in Hull, 
used to walk to his new house at East Mount along this road 
in pattens, **to keep her feet out of the water, so abundant 
in this locality." 

Many entries in the Book of the Provost of St. John at 
Beverley, relate to Southcoates where the lords of Sutton 
held a Manor under the College, while other persons also held 
lands directly under it. The manor was held at a rent of 
eight shillings per annum, and when Sir Thomas de Sutton 
failed to appear at the Court of the Provost or to pay his 
rent, he was fined like other tenants or was excused like 
others. Sir Thomas succeeded his brother Sir John, who had 
held one manor in Sutcoates and two carucates of land, 
presumably arable, with the meadow and pasture and houses 
that went with it. In the 26th, Henry VI his representatives 
were Sir Edmund Hastings, Sir John Salvayn, and the 

* This is the true effect of an entry in the Patrington Register, which 
I examined with the late Canon Maddock ; ** but " being there used for 
** except." 



SOUTHCOATES. 47 

Ladies Isabella Godard, wife of John Cussons, and Constancia 
Pygott or Bigod, who then shared the divided manor. Their 
lands in Sutcotes are described as arable, meadow and pasture. 
In the reign of Henr}' VIIL, Salvayn's share passed through 
Sir William Sydney and the Crown to the Corporation of 
Hull. 

The hamlet of Southcoates seems to have contained 
several small farms or cottages with crofts at their rear and 
sheepcots close to the pasturage. The Manor Rolls and other 
evidences shew that there were in Southcoates, besides Sum- 
mergangs, the following open fields and meadows : — 

The East Field, West Field, and Humber Field, were 
originally the three open arable fields necessary for a rotation 
of wheat, spring crops, and fallow ; but by the reign of 
Elizabeth, and probably long before, all these had been laid 
down in grass. Indeed, the old plough-lands, when they are 
clearly visible, seem never to have acquired the double 
curvature characteristic. of ancient tillage. I think the fields 
were at least partly meadow, for fines were inflicted on those 
who turned cattle into some of them or drove across them 
after Candlemas. The South Ings meadow abutted on 
Humber bank and adjoined the Humber Field. 

The ** Wood" adjoined the West and East Fields ; it con- 
tained about twelve acres. There was a dike from East 
Field gate to West Field gate ** about the Wood.'' It was 
probably rough pasturage, with some trees or bushes ; 
William Hogg lived at the Woodhouse. In 1578, Katherine 
Wetherall was fined i2d. for cutting down **burceir* in the 



48 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

Wood. Burcell or bristle was a dead fence or the thorns or 
brushwood used for fencing. Besides these, there were the 
Ewelands, the Chimney land, and the Cornepasture, all lying 
to the north-east of Southcoates. 

The Ewelands was a good-sized meadow owned by 
different persons ; perhaps their ewes were sent there from 
Summergangs when the lambs were turned into Sutton Ings 
to be weaned. It adjoined Marfleet, for ^ir Philip Constable's 
tenant. Mr. Miller, held **all that parcel of meadow lying in 
Ewland containing eight acres, bounded by Marfleet Common 
on the east." It was near to Sutton Ings, for in 1726 Anne 
Kirby conveyed to Peter Langrick two acres of meadow 
there, near to Ewland Gate, which may have been the 
Toll-bar. 

The **Chimley land" adjoined the Ewelands and the Com- 
mon. In 1554, Stephen Hogge, of Stoneferry, left to a child 
then expected his Chimney Land — if a son. It has been 
suggested that lands were so called because turves for fuel 
might be cut in them, or because a Chimin or way passed 
through them. Christopher Bennington had to pay ten 
shillings for neglecting the dike between his Chimley land 
and Yowelande, and the tenants of Ewelands were fined a 
shilling for not having scoured two cordes, or fourteen yards, 
of the dike between them. 

In 17 1 3, a conveyance from Beauley and Nettleton to 
Thomas Wetwang, a Sutton yeoman, included four acres of 
meadow in the Ings running over the '*Cawsey," one end 
extending to the Sideing, and the other to Chimney lands. 



SOUTHCOATES. 49 

The Side-Ings was a small ancient enclosure by Landsyke 
drain, south of Bellfield ; the Cawsey (or Causeway) was, I 
suppose, the Holderness Road. Another strip of one acre 
ran **over the Cawsey adjoining Bilton Common." In a copy 
of "Paynes for the Middle Balywick," of about 1650, the jury, 
which dealt with all the greater water-courses in the district, 
ordered that ** the sewer beginning at Chimney lands Nooke, 
and that runneth betwixt the Sumergams and the Ings, and 
runneth to the new sewer at Maunsdale, and from thence to 
Mounsdale Clow, be well dressed witii sythe and rake, and 
ground-scoured where need requires, in pains of every corde 
undone ids." This is Summergangs dike, running from the 
boundary of Marfleet, which is not otherwise referred to in 
this copy of Paynes. Another conveyance includes meadow 
abutting upon "a close of meadow" called Chimney lands. 
The Cornepasture, probably tillage laid down to grass, 
may have been enclosed land. Thomas and Frances Hogg 
were joint tenants of the Corne Pasture House. In 1659, 
Joseph Blaides, senr., left to his son William, who in 1667 
devised to his sons, ** land called the Corne Pasture and 
the Ewelands, containing 24 acres." I suspect that these 
were old enclosures out of the East Field. There was a 
close called Galencroft. 

The entries of encroachments in the rolls of the Manor 
Courts shew that the Common was part of Summergangs, 
that which lay south of the Holderness Road. It adjoined 
the West Field, for Thomas Teele had to pay i2d. for not 
sufficiently digging out the dike between them. It adjoined 



50 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

the Chimley land, for Robert Hodgson was fined ten shillings 
in respect of twenty cordes of the intervening dike. 

In 1422, William Twyer of Ganstead, by a charter which 
I have seen, caused to be settled upon his son Robert, on his 
marriage, lands, which included a messuage, a croft, eleven 
acres and a half of plough land, one acre and three roods of 
Meadow in Sotcotes and three animal pastures in the Frith, 
which was in the same locality. 

The Court Leet or view of Frank Pledge, a Royal Court, 
and the Court Baron of the Lords of the Manor were held 
together twice a year, in April or May and in September or 
October ; a few of the Rolls, the earlier in Latin, are preser- 
ved at the Town Hall. They are usually headed like the 
first which begins as follows : — * 

* * Sudcotes. View of Prank Pledge with the Court Baron 
of the Mayor and Burgesses of the Town of Kingeston upon 
Hull and of Philipp Constable Esquire, Thomas Dalton, 
John Stanhoppe, John Cockerell, Ralph Brown, and heirs of 
Robert Hogge, Lords of the Manor, held there the 12th day 
of October in the i8th year of the reign of our Lady Eliza- 
beth by the Grace of God Queen of England France and 
Ireland, Defender of the Faith, &c." The Court elected 
four Adjisters, called jesters, or keepers of the fields, a Con- 
stable and a Bailiff, and then dealt with some thirty or forty 
** suitors," who were absent, either excusing or fining them 

* I have to thank the Property Committee of the Corporation for per-, 
mission to use these Rolls, and I am particularly indebted to Mr. Boyle, 
as already mentioned. 



SOUTHCOATES. 5 1 

eigfhtpence each. Henry Randes was the Steward. The 
Jury of about fifteen was sworn and they had to take the 
list of offences and deliver their verdict a few days later at 
the house of John Lewis in Hull, under a penalty of from 
six and eight pence to forty shillings each. Waste, or stray, 
cattle had to be handed over to John Lewis. 

The ordinary offences were such as not keeping up 
ditches or fences for which they were responsible, omitting 
to make a clute or dam across a ditch where necessary, 
driving cattle across a clute, not bringing in their rams from 
Summergangs at the proper season, turning horses into ^ 
sheep pasture, turning pigs or geese into a pasture, not 
taking their sheep out of the meadow ground at the feast of 
the Purification, driving cattle across a field at forbidden 
times, turning out sheep or cattle where they had no right, 
taking them in or out without informing the Wardens or 
Jesters, permitting swine to go unringed or to go **wroting" 
in the field, allowing dogs to chase sheep, keeping an unlaw- 
ful dbg, turning out diseased animals, as Richard Hoge did 
with "tow skabed horsses" and one with glanders to the 
infection of the others, fold-breach, or liberating cattle im. 
pounded for trespass, or for non payment of "Jest money.*' 

The fines varied greatly for the same offence as to place, 
time, and the extent of the offence. Generally the basis for 
the calculation was the noble of six shillings and eight pence. 
Turning put diseased animals might cost 3s. 4d. or 6s. 8d., 
turning out geese 5s. to los., sheep or cattle wrong 2d. to is., 
a -biill .2s,, a swine wroting 4d. Twenty cordes (of twenty- 



52 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

one feet) seems to have been a usual length of dike for a 
tenant to keep in order ; to neglect this might cost him ten 
shillings. But often the fines were so trivial, that the jury- 
men must have considered the chance of their own turn 
coming next. The Finders, who had to impound stray cattle, 
were ordered not to take for their " punsalls " more than 2d. 
for a horse, or id. for a beast or five sheep. This confirms 
the ordinary estimate of five sheep to one beast-gate. 

Many tenants who had made encroachments on the 
Common or Summergangs had to pay from two pence to 
eiglit pence a year annually therefor, there Weing, it seems, 
no absolute prohibition. 

To let rights of pasturage to strangers was an offence 
for which fines of eight pence to six and eight pence satisfied 
the Court, but a tenant might let grazing rights to another 
tenant if he gave notice to the Jesters. The rule, of doubt- 
ful application in Sutton, that pasturage could only be held 
by an inhabitant, "down sitting- and uprising," does not 
seem to have existed here, for among the suitors are resi- 
dents in adjacent townships. 

The Court dealt with cases of debt or damage between 
the Suitors. It made orders as to the repair of Humber 
bank, as to keeping up military exercises and enforcing the 
sumptuary laws by which every one had to dress according* 
to his degree. Rarely it made orders applicable to Drypool,. 
the relations of this place with Southcoates being variable 
and difiicult to understand. 

Once Leonard Lockwood and William Hdgge had to 



SOUTHCOATES. S3 

answer for failing to pay 2s. 8d. for three **se sparres" — 
pieces of ship timber — bought of Leonard Stutt. Then 
Leonard Lockwood complained that John Cockerell, having 
accepted ten shillings, had not let him have pasture for 
certain beasts as he had faithfully promised, whereupon the 
defendent came and said the complainant might have the 
pasture. 

In April 1595, the Jury presented the inhabitants of 
Sudcotes for wearing of hattes, the total penalty being 4d. 
It being then obligatory on men to wear on Sundays and 
holidays woollen caps of English make under a penalty of 
3s. 4d., the inhabitants of Sutcots and Dripole were pre- 
sented in October for not wearing capps according to the 
statute and were amerced in 6d. only. The township of 
Sutcots was amerced in i2d. for not keeping their Stocks in 
repair. For not watching according to the statute, the inhabi- 
tants of Sutcots were amerced in i2d, and for not exercising 
the statute for ** artylyrie " their amercement was 6d. John 
Aldred was ordered to keep his gate from Dripole field, 
(in Sutton) into Summergangs in sufficient repair, hung 
and locked, and the **bursels" or fences at both ends of 
the gate in repair. No one might make a brigg from his 
meadow in Sutton Ings across Summergangs dike unless it 
was properly fenced and so kept. The same Court ordered 
that, as there were divers places in the South Ings where 
the Humber bank was in great ruin and decay, sufficient 
timber should be taken ** of that which now lyethe a scattered 
abrod on the banke, grothes and pasture of the South 



54 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

Ings" for the lockering of the same. And it was ordered 
that for the cost of the work every lord, freeholder, or tenant, 
for term of years, in the South Ings should pay 2s. 6d. 
for '* every Noble ancient rent '* they had in the South 
Ings. The meaning of the Noble in relation to pasturage in 
Southcoates will appear from other evidences. 

This Court of the 20th October, 1595, is notable for the 
variety of its business. John Graves did fealty and was sworn a 
tenant. Mr. Robert Dalton who had succeeded his father as 
one of the lords of the manor had not shewed his evidences 
but he had promised to shew and examine them to any 
who should be thought meet at his own house before the 
next Court. Mr. Eestoft had made the like default but his 
tenant Mr. Shipwrighte (a Sutton man) craved respite till 
the next Court. 

The fines were moderated by the Jury, written in English, 
and ordered to be read out in church where the whole parish 
would hear. Very few would be entitled by their own 
innocence to scoff at their neighbours on account of such 
exposure. 

The struggles of the writer of the later Rolls to set down 
unfamiliar words and phrases are pathetic, but he gives some 
evidence of the local pronunciation of Yorkshire and Lincoln- 
shire words. He writes of yowes, bease, boles, geyse, and 
yates that must *^ hinge of iorane lowpes and crukes." One 
list is of **paymens layde at thyse corte howldene at Sutcotes 
in the xxxj yeare of the reigne of oure sufFeringe layde the 
quenne maightye." The **sonne and hare" succeeds his 



SOUTHCOATES. 



SS 



father. A tenant must **dacke his dike" or "dacke his 
dacke" or **make half dacke." A dack was a hollow or 
furrow that might let off water, perhaps a mere grip. Then 
the tenants " shall none genge no horse gaytes from theyre 
Sheppe gaytes nor shepp gaytes from theyre hors gaytes," 
upon pain of every default los., unless they exchanged or 
substituted half a common together. It was thus secured 
that at least forty sheep should be dealt with when the tenant 
chose to change one kind of animals for another. Geng or 
genge is a variant of ging, a troop or gang. But this scribe 
also uses "geng'^ for give — as "to geng warning." 

From lists of suitors in attendance at this court, or 
amerced for absence, or excused, compared with the list of 
estreats in October 1593, when all were absent through the 
omission of the bailiff to summon them, we have the following 
names, nearly in the order in which they were called : — 



Freeholders : 

Richard Hillyard, Gentleman. 
Robert Hog"g". 
Simon Wetherell. 
Thomas Rawiingson. 
John Gregorie. 
William Willson. 
Thomas Bennington. 
Stephen Hogg of Stoneferie. 
John Aldred, Esquire. 
The heirs of Bamebie. 
The heirs of Threshwell. 
The heirs of Girlington. 
Michael Beesbie. 
Robert Gayton. 
Walter Proctor. 



Leaseholders and tenants at Will: 

Marmaduke Grimstone, Esquire. 

John Chicken. 

George Almond. 

Margaret Rawiingson. 

The heirs of Christopher Askwith. 

Joshua Wakefield. 

Richard Hogge, Junior. 

William Barnes. 

Thomas Hogge, Senior. 

Margaret Hodgeson. 

Peter Almond. 

Henry Constable, Knight. 

Margaret Tweene. 

Thomas Grimstone. 

Frances Hogge. 



56 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 



Robert Spencer {Leaseholder), 
Christopher Hillyard, Knig'ht. 
Paul Carter. 
Christopher Hogg". 
Thomas Anderson, alias Fox. 
Miles Todd. 
Thomas Hogg". 
William Humpton. 



Robert Stephenson. 
Matthew Tuttell. 
Leonard Lockwood. 
Robert Dew. 
John Graves. 
Richard Huntingdon. 
Thomas Wood. 
Roger Keddie. 



A few names, perhaps of temporary occupiers of pasture 
gates, are missing, Thomas Anderson, alias Fox, and Todd 
were probably tenants of John Alford, Esquire, of Fawley 
Court, Wilts, lessee of the Rectory and tithes of Sutton. 
He was elder brother of Sir Lancelot Alford, lessee of the 
meadows and pasturage in Sutton and Summergangs that 
had belonged to Meaux Abbey. John had inherited the 
rectorial tithes and lands in Sutton and other property, 
leasehold and freehold. At a Court held about 1590, Edward 
Trislay was ordered to shew his evidence for his Common 
in Summergangs. He was Edward Truslove, gentleman, of 
Wawne and Sutton, a relative of the Alfords, and lessee 
under them of the Rectory lands. He was the father or 
grandfather of John Truslove, of Wawne and Stoneferry. . 

The Noble of grass was the result of a valuation made of 
the new pasturage when the arable fields were laid down, in 
the fifteenth or sixteenth century. The number of cattle-gates 
that the open grass lands, apart from Summergangs, would 
support, was then calculated, and three gates were supposed 
to be worth an annual rent of 6s. 8d., or a noble. These 
were then allotted to the freeholders, in proportion to their 
holdings. This involved fractions, but the beast-gate being 



SOUTHCOATES. 57 

divided into four feet, two feet was a gate for a foal or a calf. 
The fractional parts of a Noble were often expressed rather 
awkwardly in money — William Woolfe was amerced in 2d. 
for unjustly filling two gates, " over 4s. 2d. of grass." 

The difficulties arising out of the ownership of land in 
common fields are illustrated by records (Exchequer Special 
Commissions, loth and i ith, Charles I.), of proceedings by 
Katherine, Mary, and Margaret Davie, whose grandmother, 
dame Katherine Moore, had bought the reversion of the Sutton 
Rectory, after the lease, granted by Queen Elizabeth to the an- 
cestors of the defendant, Henry Alford. He said that certain 
lands which they claimed were not part of the Rectorial lands, 
but the Court ordered them to be given up, and appointed 
a Special Commission of four persons to set them out. 
They agreed as to several items of the claim, but differed 
about a tenement called Bursiland, in Sutton, sometime 
let to Thomas Foxe, and a bovate or oxgang of land 
called Bursiland, in Sutton and Sudcoats, lately held by 
John Meeke. The report of James Watkinson and Robert 
Moore reveals a conflict, after which their two colleagues 
refused to discuss the matter further, and carried the Com- 
mission away. It is easy to see how the confusion might 
have arisen. ^ 

The farmstead called Bursiland, worth 6s. 8d. per annum, 
a mere cottage being worth 4s., was probably named from 
the bushes or thorns locally called bursels, used for making 
a dead fence, and the oxgang of land, originally let with it, 
would bear its name. But the arable fields of Southcoates, 



58 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

laid down to grass, were valued in Nobles, and the identity 
of the strips of tillage must have been forgotten. When, 
in 1710, Hugh Mason bought the Sutton Rectory from 
Brodrepp, the heir of the plaintiffs, he took a conveyance 
of the tenement called Byrsall Lands, and the oxgang called 
Byrsill, but perhaps these properties were never identified. 

Gyme Close, one of the lands in dispute, containing 4f 
acres, took its name from the "Gyme," which was, I think, 
on the small piece of Summergangs close to the Holderness 
Road, and near to Mile House, over which piece Southcoates 
Lane passed. A Gyme was a hole formed in the ground by 
the giving way of an embankment. There were, near there, 
a large pond, and a little watercourse called Gyme Sike. The 
Commission found that Gyme Close abutted north on Sum- 
mergangs and south on the West Field. The Enclosure 
Award gives a right of way through the south-east corner of 
lands allotted to Benjn. Blaydes, called the Gyme, and from 
thence turning south-west upon the side of the old enclosure 
into another part of* the Gyme, leading from Sudcoates to 
Hull. It also awarded a thirty foot road on the allotment of 
Benjn. Blaydes from the Turnpike road near the Gyme Sike 
on the south-west side of the Gyme, to West Field as far as 
the village of Sudcoates. This is rather vague, but I think 
this small piece of Summergangs west of Mile House was 
called the Gyme. 

For the benefit of the present inhabitants I have given 
some idea of the intolerable complexity of the system of 
common fields. 



SOUTHCOATES. 59 

The name of Sir Philip Constable, of Everingham, whose 
estates were forfeited for treason against the Commonwealth, 
is of melancholy interest in connection with Southcoates as 
in Stoneferry, he being lord of a third of this manor also. In 
March, 1652, the survey shewed that his total annual income 
there was £ig 19s. 6d., but the surveyors thought the value to 
be £2 1 6s. more. Among other tenants, Thomas Harrison 
had a cottage, and a two-acre meadow called Ember Garth, 
with one Noble in the East Field, and one in Humberfield. 
He had also ** ten pence," or the eighth of a Noble in the 
Wood, and 160 sheep-gates in Sommergaines. I suppose 
Constable's property was sold, but he was allowed to 
compound for his chief estates, by paying a fine of one- 
third of their value. The family is now represented at Ever- 
ingham by Lord Herries. 

John Dalton, of Swine, who had inherited a share in the 
manor, was a fellow-sufferer. In 1653 he complains to the 
Committee for Compounding that, although two-thirds of his 
estate is sequestered for his recusancy^ his third has not been 
set apart for him, so that he cannot comply with the demands 
of his creditors. This was granted "if sequestered for 
recusancy only." In 1654 he begs to contract for the two- 
thirds under the Recusants Act of 1653. He owned the 
Hastings berewic, married the Lady Mary Viscountess 
Dowager Dunbar, and lived at Nuttles. In 1685 he 
, died. 

The eighteenth century was the period when the great 
bulk of the open fields in England was enclosed, and allotted 



6a EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

to private owners, their value being enormously increased. 
But very considerable enclosures had before been effected. 
A large piece containing nine fields in the north-east corner 
of the parish was treated as old enclosure in 1764. 
About 1590, the East Field seems to have extended to the 
Oxlands in Sutton, for the Court ordered the ditch between 
those lands to be cleansed.* 

The moving spirit in the enclosures carried out in South- 
coates was Charles Pool, the younger, through whose 
influence Sutton parish was enclosed, in 1767. He was 
a prominent man in Hull, a nephew of the Rev. William 
Mason the Vicar of Holy Trinity, and cousin of the Rev. 
Arthur Robinson who succeeded to the benefice. 

Summergangs was enclosed in 1748, the pasture gates 
being then reckoned by Demain, or Stinted Commons 
and Free Commons, which were of double value. The 
Demain Common meant pasturage for eighty sheep and 
four horses or beasts. Charles Pool, having acquired 
a large proportion, and being, also, the owner of the 
tithes, brought the other owners of pasturage to an agree- 
ment, whereby this wide area was cut up into sections, 
the tithe upon which was fixed at one shilling and 
sixpence per acre. Dansom Lane now runs along the 
western margin of Summergangs, close to old Summer- 
gangs Dike. That the flow of water along this dike had 
already been cut off is clear, for this lane, first called Clow 

• There was somewhere a little Oxland, which may be that here 
referred to. If so, Ewelands was an ancient meadow. 



SOUTHCOATES. 6 1 

Lane, and, for a short time, Mill Lane, was made to enable 
cattle to be taken from the Holderness Road to drink at 
**Mansley,'' or **Munsley" Clow ditch, near to Edward 
Hodgson's farm house, on Magnusdaile, where the water 
had been diverted to the river. 

Of the three ancient open fields the Humber Field was 
the first to be enclosed. In 17 17, Elizabeth Robinson con- 
veyed to Sarah Robinson lands including a "close of meadow 
or pasture formerly called the Thirteen and fourpence," con- 
taining three acres in Sudcoates. In 1727, Sarah Robinson 
conveyed to Wm. Jarratt the same close in Humber Field, 
** which said field was some years ago enclosed and allotted 
in lieu of six beast gates, commonly called thirteen shillings 
and fourpence of grass." But if I have correctly identified 
the Humber Field, it was enclosed long before 171 7. In the 
nth Charles I. the commissioners in the case of Davey and 
Alford, who quarrelled over Bursill lands, agreed that 
Humber Close was a close of pasture ground of about 5^ 
^cres, abutting south and west on Sudcoates Humber Field, 
east on a pasture ground called Sudcoates South Inges, and 
north on a pasture ground called Sudcoates West Field. 
This Humber close must in 1636 have already been enclosed 
out of the Humber Field. 

The East and West Fields, with the South Ings, which 
seems to have ceased to be meadowed, were enclosed in 
1764 under the influence of Charles Pool, who enclosed 
Summergangs, and on similar terms. The total amount of 
pasturage dealt with was 94 nobles, one gate, one foot, and 



62 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

the sixth part of a gate, which would be grazing for one 
sheep. 

To those of us who remember Southcoates two genera- 
tions ago its then condition seems already ancient. At the 
enclosure, ditches were cut to define the allotments, the 
Holderness Road, having been, I think, until that time, 
open to the Common. 

The allotment in Summergangs, made to Mr. William 
Constable on the north side of the Holderness Road, with 
adjoining lands, was within a few yeai^s occupied by a 
house, the property of Mr. Hall. In 1785 it was ad- 
vertised for sale as **a handsome new-built house, 
commanding a beautiful expansive view of the H umber." 
It became the residence of Mr. . Pickard, who sold it 
to Mr. John Broadley. By the kindness of Mr. Walter 
J. Jalland, I am able to give an illustration of the original 
house. In 1838 it was bought by Mr. Boswell Middleton 
Jalland and his brother, who erected in its place the. fine 
Elizabethan mansion called Holderness House, two illustra- 
tions of which appear in Poulson's ** Holderness." 

Except Holderness House, no residence, unconnected 
with business premises, was erected on the north side of 
Holderness Road beyond Dansom Lane before 1850. About 
that date the site of Wilton Terrace at the corner of Dansom 
Lane and the Holderness Road was still a grass field. With 
several properties in Sutton and Hull, it was left by Thomas 
Mould to John Graham, afterwards Graham-Clarke, of New- 
castle, the son of John Graham, of Sutton, and the 



.^? 







i 







SOUTHCOATES, 63 

maternal grandfather of the poetess, Elizabeth Barrett 
Browning. Nearly all the old buildings north of the 
road have been removed, but one long covered rope-walk 
is now embedded in a great joinery factory. The mills, with 
the smoking chimneys of distant factories, were the great 
features in the approach from Holderness.* 

The mill, called Block House Mill, recently taken down, 
stood in Drypool by Summergangs, in a line with the centre 
of Witham. Its lower story was, in shape, like a dwarf 
tower or fortification. But sketches on the maps of the 
allottments shew only a little wooden mill. I suppose it 
took its name from Blockhouse Lane. 

South of Holderness Road, the terrace called Somers 
Town had then been built many years, and there were 
better houses beyond, the last terrace being Hornsea Parade, 
near Marfleet Lane. But, before the days of omnibuses, build- 
ing tor residence was pretty strictly limited within the 
distance, to and from which a business man could walk 
for his early dinner, or even, in those times of long hours, 
to and from his early tea. Hull was then supposed to be 
finally completed, but I have since heard of far-sighted 
people who thought that the town might extend even beyond 
such limits. Its population has trebled under our eyes. 

• These mills included the ** Six Sail Mill," the sails of which, having 
caused the death of a man, were said to have revolved afterwards the 
contrary way ! Such was the legend ; but the Rev. John Ellam, formerly 
the Vicar of Drypool, heard as a fact that, the accident having happened 
during its construction, the owner had the machinery reversed as a mark 
of his sorrow. 



64 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 



DRYPOOL IN SWINE. 

Drypool Church. — Its Separation from Swine. — The Arnescroft and 
Kirke Field. — Piece of Southcoates detached. — Dissolution of Swine 
Priory, Thornton Abbey, and Carthusian Priory at Hull. — Fortifica- 
tions of Henry VIII. — Disposal of surplus lands. — Parish Registers. 
— Seventeenth century Citadel. — Families of Popple, Watson, Brom- 
flete, St. Quintin, Blaides, Pool. — Modem chang^es. — Anticipations. 

Owing to the lack of efficient drainage, and to the 
frequent floods of early times, this remote corner of Holder- 
ness would be nearly valueless, until the great demand 
for wool brought every acre that would carry sheep into 
practical use. The old tillage of doubtful dryness would 
then be more valuable as meadow and pasture, and this 
seems to have been the case through later times. The page 
of evidences in Poulson's ** Holderness," does not afford 
much help, for references to Drypool are inextricably mixed ' 
with Sutton and Southcoates ; but, except as to Drypool 
Field, in Sutton, of 29 acres, there is little evidence of 
mediaeval or modern tillage. 

Although the Chapel of St. Peter was the mother church 
of Southcoates, both were included, together with the manors, 
in the parish of Swine. A manuscript book of the fifteenth 
century, in the library of the Dean and Chapter of York, 
records some long and complicated proceedings in various 
ecclesiastical courts, relating to the right of burial of the 
inhabitants of Sutton, Stoneferry, Dripole (in Sutton), and 



X Cotton MS., Avcvsrcs i, ' 

SolTH OF DRVPOOL ChVBI 



DRYPOOL IN SWINE. 6$ 

Lopholme at their chapel of Sutton, which was not yet 
separated from the mother church of Wawne. On the 
23rd March, 1429, John Wylflete, of Hedon, whose family 
belonged to Preston and Marfleet, said that several years 
ago many persons were drowned in the river at Hull 
Ferry, and their bodies were taken out in the parish of 
Swine, which would be the eastern bank of the river at 
Drypool.* 

After the Reformation this parochial arrangement broke 
down, and, under the Common weallih, a remedy was sought.' 
A Survey, made in 1649, states. thmt **Drypoole hath a 
Parochial Chapel depending upon Swyne ; the tythes belong 
to the Lordship of Drypoole and Sudcoats, and are worth 
yearly the value of thirty pounds, out of which they should 
provide for a minister, but have not had one this four years 
and a half. We consider it fitt that it be Separate from 
Swyne, and made a parish of itself, being five miles 
distant from Swyne." This scheme was carried out at a 
later date. A memorandum of the early part of the 
eighteenth century states that the advowson was bought 
by Alderman Johnson, of Hull, and left to his daughter, 
Mary Banes. 

The fields or open places in Drypool were the Arnes- 
croft Meadow, adjoining Southcoates West Field, also 
the Kirke Field, adjoining the Humber Field, of Southcoates. 
There was somewhere a Middle Field, as well as a Dripole 

* Wililete was the old name for the dike that divided Southcoates from 

Marfleet. 

E 



66 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

West Field, which last agrees with the Clough Field in 
Sutton.* 

The Arnescroft was evidently a large meadow in which 
all who had much interest in Drypool had shares. There is 
no part of Drypool that answers to this except the large 
piece thrust in between Summergangs and the rest of South- 
coates. This leaves very little ground for Humber Field, 
but the Humber must have laken a breadth of land along 
that shore, in spite of the **Jk)6kering'* done to the bank in 
the South Ings^ 

In 1579 tenants in Humber Field were fined ten shillings 
because they had not sufficiently dug out 20 cordes of dike 
or 420 feet next the Kirke Field. The Stowe MS., 
No. 70, in the British Museum is a grant made about 1250 
by Geoffrey de Watton to the Nunnery of Swine of lands 
including **an acre and a half and a perch in the territory of 
Dripol in Neucroft, whereof one head extends to the Humber 
and the other head upon Arnes Croft, and an acre and a perch 
of meadow at Thorndaile towards the south." Neucroft 
was probably a recent extension of Kirke Field, which was 
near the Church, so as to bring it in touch with Humber 
Field. No. 71 is another grant, with his body for burial, 
by this same Geoffrey, of ** those two selions (or plough- 
lands) which extend from the dike of Arnescroft as far as 
the Humber, and that acre and a perch of meadow lying 

• A Corporation lease of 1695, to Thos. Atkinson, includes five roods 
of pasture "in Drypool feild, nigh Moundscale Clough of Clough feild." 
This must have been their share of the wide Growths, for the Clough 
Field was never laid down to grass. 



(P 



DRYPOOL IN SWINE. 67 

next to the 'cultura' of the said Nunnery at Thornedaile.'* 
These were probably the same lands, and the term **cultura" 
is sometimes used for meadow. 

An old enclosure in this locality is indicated in the entry 
in the book of the Provost of Beverley of the 26th Henry VI., 
already quoted. The lords of the Manor of Sudcoats are 
said to hold of the Lord Provost a place of lands with the 
appurtenances in the town of Dripole, *'and it lies between 
the place of the Abbot of Thornton to the north and the 
Outgang which leads to the pasture called Newfrith to 
the south." Was this upon the detached piece of 
Southcoates sold, as we shall see, in 165 1 by Broumflitt to 
Popple? If so, it indicates the position of the land of 
Thornton Abbey. Further evidences as to localities not 
easy to identify are contained in the surveys made of lands 
acquired for the fortifications in Dry pool. 

To begin at the beginning : — The land sold in the first 
year of Richard II. by Sir Thomas de Sutton to the Mayor 
of Hull and others lay "on the east side of the water 
of Hull on the north side of the Kaye there." It consisted 
of one piece measuring 100 ells each way ** within the 
lordship of the said Thomas de Sutton in Dripole ; " also 
the land on which the Quay was situated containing 100 ells 
in length and 10 in breadth. This must surely have been in 
the Drypool associated with his Manor of Sutton. There is 
no evidence that this land was used for the expressed pur- 
pose of building a fortification. The fortifications actually 
made there grew out of different conditions at a later time. 



68 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

The dissolution under Henry VIII. of the Priory of Nuns 
at Swine, the Carthusian Priory at Hull, and Thornton 
Abbey, brought much of the limited area of Drypool into 
the possession of the King. These lands had been let to 
tenants, and the Crown when in need ot money, leased or 
sold thqm with others for large sums paid down, subject 
always to the existing tenancies. The chief points of interest 
here are the lands by the river on which were erected the 
Block Houses and their connecting walls. The land of the 
Carthusians was in Sutton, extending from the North Bridge 
to Dripolegote ; that of the Nunnery lay to the south in 
Swine. The land of Thornton Abbey was in the Drypool 
portion of Swine, or partly in Southcoates. 

I have long suspected that all the lands of the Carthusians 

« 

in Sutton, Lopholme, Stoneferry, and Drypole, east of the 
River Hull, being those which had decended from Benedict 
de Sculcoates through the families of De Grey of Rotherfield 
and De la Pole, were, like the Hastings berewic, independent 
of the lords of Sutton. After the fortifications were erected 
the surplus land was granted to Sir Henry Gates, and upon 
the deed a memorandum was added that * * the said Mannor 
o£ Skulcots dothe extende into ye P*ishes and hamletts of 
Sculcots, Sutton lordP-, Drypole and Stonefery. " This con- 
dition might have been created when Henry VIII. acquired 
the manor, but there is some evidence that it was of older 
standing. As far back as the time of Sayer the second, when 
a canal was cut in the West Carr, arrangements had to be 
made by the Monks not only with the lord of Sutton and John 



DRYPOOL IN SWINE. 6g 

de Meaux, the owner of the berewic, as to rights of fishery, 
but with WiHiam de Seintluce (Santa Lucia), who then held 
the Sculcoates Manor. Evidently lie was of more importance 
than a free tenant. And in 1312 there is an entry upon the 
Close Roll (New Calendar, 5, Edw. ii, m. 16), otdering the 
King's Escheator to restore to the widow the lands which 
John de Grey, of Rotherfield, ** tenant in chief, held in 
Scolecotes, Sutton, and Drypol." Perhaps when the course 
of the river was originally marked out, certain patches of dry 
land belonging to the Sculcoates mafhor were left on the 
eastern side. • # "* 

On the surrender of Swine Priory in 1536, its Drypool 
property consisted of two holdings only — a grange let to 
John Williamson, chaplain, at £6 a year, and a close called 
**le pightell," with six acres of meadow, let to Robert 
Blassill at i8s.* Among the appurtenances to the grange 
there was probably meadow in *' Sutton Yngs," besides 37 
acres of meadow there let separately at 49s. 4d. All these 
lands were granted with the rest of the Swine property to Sir 
Richard Gresham, who was receiving the rents from the 
tenants in 1539. Among the Spiritualities of the Priory was 
the Rectory of Driepoole, worth five pounds a year, the tithe 
of which the Prioress had kept in her own hands. 

When the King determined to make the fortifications, the 
lands had to be got back from Gresham by an exchange 
carried out under Edward VI. The grange was then said to 

* He also held a lathe or bam, two stables, and two gardens in 
Southcoates and Stoneferry. The registers and other documents shew 
that this Drypool family survived there into the Eighteenth Century. 



70 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

be in the township of Drypoole adjoining the King's Majesty's 
edifications and fortress.* 

The fortifications having been finished, Queen Mary 
granted to John Grene and William Jenyns, property includ- 
ing Drypole Grange with the appurtenances now described 
as 3 J oxgangs of land, 15^ acres of meadow in a close called 
Armescroft, 5 acres of meadow in Sutton Yngs, in a place 
called Grym, and the tithes of the 15^ acres in Armescroft, 
three cottages in Drypole, near the graveyard, a bercaria 
called Swynelathes, with the manure from all animals pastur- 
ing therein, and all other property let with the grange. 
All this was let on lease to Thomas Aldred, Esquire,t at 
£^ IIS. 4d., and if these ** appurtenances" went with the 
grange when the rent was jQ6^ the difference seems to be 
due to the absorption of land for the fortifications. The 
land so absorbed would lie west and south of the church. 
There appears to have been already a tower there at the 
entrance to the Old Harbour, to which was secured one end 
of the chain that closed the Port, and if there were also 
houses there, as shewn in the plan in the Cotton Collection, 
they or some of them might be included in the appurtenances 
originally acquired with Drypool Grange. 

As to Swynelathes, the charter {B.M., L.F.C., VIII., 7), 

* There was also included a cottag^e with a close in Drypool, called 
Langcroft, let on lease to Agues Squyer, widow, at 5s. 4d. She held 
Magnusdaile under Meaux Abbey, and if this is the Langcroft that 
adjoins Hedon Crofl, the name of Drypool extended further into Sutton 
than I have supposed. 

t Alrede, Aldred, or Alured — the family so long prominent in and 
about Hull. 



4 



DRYPOOL IN SWINE. *Jl 

which still bears the seal of Sayer the third, grants to the 
nuns the sheepfold *^ which lies next to the land called 
Hedoncroft in Sutton just as it is bounded by the dikes.*' 
I have placed Swynelathes on the Key Map with Hedon Close 
and Langcroft, which are so named in the Sutton Tithe 
Award of 1843. **Grym," or the Grimes would lie unfenced 
in the Ings adjacent. 

Early in the Seventeenth Century the Crown was raising 
large sums on the remainder of the monastic lands. In 1609 
Sir Baptist Hicks, a London Merchant, afterwards Lord 
Campden and his associates, having paid ;£^75)OOo, James L, 
at their instance, granted to Edward Bates and Henry Ellwes 
lands including the pightell with 1 1 acres of meadow in the 
Ings, formerly held by Robert Blassill. 

In the first year of Queen Mary surplus lands, formerly 
belonging to Thornton Abbey, were granted to Domina Joan 
Constable, widow, and Sir John Constable, of Burton Con- 
stable. They included a cottage in Drypole, an oxgang of 
land and pasture in the Kirkefelde, a sheep cote and half a 
close of land of i^ acres in the fields of Drypole, land and 
pasture in ** le Midlefelde," Drypole, called a ^^pyghell,** 
half an oxgang of land and pasture in the fields of Drypole, 
containing i\ acres, i^ acres of land and pasture in le Midle- 
feld, and a close of an acre in the town of Drypole. The 
Middle Field would lie between the Kirkefield and the Clough 
Field in the Groves. 

On the Patent Roll, 17 Elizabeth, part 5, is a grant to John 
Sonkye and Percival Gunson of an acre and a half of meadow 



72 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

in Maunsdale, two acres of meadow In the south territory of 
Stoneferry and Dripole West Field, half an oxgang of land 
in the lordship of Drypule, called Kirkefeld, and a toft there 
containing an acre of meadow, and another acre and a half 
of meadow called Armescrofte, formerly belonging to the 
dissolved monastery of Thorneton, co. Lincoln. At the 
Dissolution, Thornton Abbey held in Drypole lands of the 
annual value of £^ is. 2^6. 

About. 1570, Mr. Robt. Ratcliffe endowed his hospital in 
Salthouse Lane with pasture tb fe^d one cow in the Kirkefield. 
In the 4th James L, Henry jAipted held pasture there for 
56 cattle. But Sir Francis Thomas purchased of him two 
oxgangs in the Kirke Field. This would be tillage. It may 
be that only one part of this field had been liaid down to grass. 
In 1645, Jeffrey Blades of Hull, Mercer, devised to his son 
Edward a close of meadow of four acres and one stang in 
Dripole Church Field.* In 1659, Joseph Blaides senior, 
of Hull, devised to his son William the Blockhouse close, 
containing 12 acres in Drypole. Also, "at Stoneferry the 
house wherein Ellen fiisher dwells, called the ffery house, 
with one garth and the groves '' and a common, and a house 
in Drypoole with free common and a Pichell. In 1667, 
William Blaides of Hull, Shipwright, devised to his son the 
same property. The family was closely connected with Scul- 
coats and Sutton. 

The Parish Registers contain some interesting items be- 

* He also left to him his gardens, &c., near Jesus Gate, ** now called 
•Blanket Row," lately purchased of Thomas Gaskin. 



1784- From Robt. Thew's Plan. 



DRYPOOL IN SWINE. 73 

longing to the time before the Blockhouses of Henry VIII. 
were superseded by the new Citadel, and when old Drypool 
still existed. In 1591, Jenet Adam of the South Blockhouse 
was buried. In 1600, Owmfrey, the son of William Hop- 
kinson was baptised, the " consponsors " being Humphrey 
Hall, rector of Patrington, Josua Hall and **Mistrees Peeke" 
of Hull. The fortifications were used as prisons for Popish 
Recusants who were very harshly treated — alive and dead. 
In 1602, Thomas Cletheray, a recusant of the North Block- 
house was put into his grave "by the means of Henry 
Garrat, without the minister and without the order of 
buriall according to law." In. 1677, Mr. Martin Frobisher 
of the South Blockhouse was buried. This bearer of a 
distinguished name may have had no connection with the 
great sea captain, for the name was in common use for a 
person who furbished up arms or utensils. Among the 
expenses of the Corporation about 1522 was one shilling 
paid ** to the Frobisher for scouring the Sword." In 1597, 
a suicide was buried on the north side of the church. The 
name of Blaides frequently appears; the Bromfleets were 
landowners improving their position from the sixteenth to 
the eighteenth century. One of the oldest local names is 
Schakyll or Shackles, of Stoneferi^ and Southcoates in 
the* fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. 

The erection, late in the seventeenth century, of the 
Citadel, which remained until the middle of the nineteenth 
century, led to many negotiations and revived old disputes 
between the Crown and the Corporation, extending back to 



74 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

their purchase from Sir Thomas de Sutton, in 1377, of land 
for a tower.* Questions relating to lands in that locality 
were dealt with in 1801, and particularly in 1861, when an 
action by. the Corporation against the Crown was dismissed. 
Owing to legal proceedings now pending, points that might 
be of interest cannot be investigated at present, but the 
following item may be usefully extracted from pro- 
ceedings in Chancery of about the latter date. See 
Chancery B. & A., i860, page 6, and Decree No. 2259, 
22 Nov., 1861. 

Until 1 68 1 there remained in use on the east side of the 
river the fortifications of Henry VIII., consisting of the 
North and South Blockhouses with the Castle standing 
between them, and the long connecting wall and ditch. But 
in that year the Ordnance Department under Charles II. 
determined to strengthen and extend these fortifications, and 
caused a new Citadel to be constructed wholly in the parish 
of Drypool, enclosing the Castle and the South Blockhouse, 
but abandoning the North Blockhouse and the connecting 
wall from the scheme of military defence. 

On the nth October, 1681, the Board of Ordnance sub- 
mitjted to Counsel ** the draughts and the conveyance for the 
lands to the south of Drypool Church and to the east of the 
Castle and South Blockhouse, to be taken in of several 
persons for the fortifications." The works were at once 
pressed on by Major Beckman, who was in charge. While he 

• See Poulson's ** Holdemess " under Drypool, and Sheehan's "Hist, 
of Hull." 



DRYPOOL IN SWINE. 75 

was Still negotiating with the Corporation, and though 
the conveyances were not complete, he was working on 
the site of the old wall and ditch on the eastern side near 
to the river, which belonged to the Crown. But after 
some long delay the purchases of land were completed, 
and **the same was duly conveyed by the several owners 
thereof." 

The two purchases contained about 30 acres, one part 
being *^all that close adjoining into the blockhouse, containing 
by estimation about 1 2 acres, lying and being in the lordship 
of Drypool," and another part containing 19 acres of pasture 
ground, '* abutting west upon the said close first described." 
The new Citadel occupied the land covered by the southern 
end of the old fortifications and part of the land purchased, 
and it projected upon the foreshore so that the tides rose from 
four to eight feet against the south wall. There remained, 
however, about 14 acres of the purchased land lying eastward 
of the Citadel, the surplus property of the Crown. The 
whole became extra parochial. 

From the description there may have been two, "several," 
or separate owners only, or there may have been "several" or 
many owners of the close and the piece of pasture ground. 
But there is no hint of a village of Drypool such as has been 
assumed to have existed south of the church, and is indeed 
shewn upon a sixteenth century drawing in the British 
Museum. Better details of old Drypool may be discovered, 
but, whether the owners were two or many, one can be 
clearly identified. 



76 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

In 1690, Elizabeth Truslove,* the sister of Thomas Watson, 
of Stoneferry, left to her daughter, Margaret Dickinson, a 
messuage and close in Drypool, which messuage had been 
lately demolished, and the ground taken from her upon 
the making of a citadel or fortifications near Drypool, 
**for which I have not as yet received any satisfaction.*' 
This seems to carry the Watson property beyond the 
manor of Sutton. Here was one of the purchases that were 
uncompleted when Major Beckman was hurrying on the 
works on the western side of the Citadel. 

In 165 1, Robert Broumfli^t conveyed to Israel Popple his 
interest in a croft on which a tenement or toft late stood 
abutting on Church-Field Lane (leading from Drypool Church 
to the Kirke Field), on which now stand buildings north of 
Popple Street. The King's highway was on the west, and 
Churchfield Lane on the south. Farm buildings on this 
land have been converted into cottages. The Hedon New 
Road, an unprofitable undertaking, sliced a portion from the 
property. With this was conveyed one little close near to it, 
the two being shewn on Capt. Philips' map and on later 
maps. The Ordnance map of 1856 shews that these were 
detached portions of Southcoates. They had common rights 
in that manor. In 1665, Thomas Bromfieet was a Church- 
warden. The name of Bromfieet appears in many entries 
in the Register, the prefix of Mr. shewing the position 

• She was the daughter of Thomas and Margaret Watson, of Stone- 
ferry, and was married to John Truslove, of Keingley, Wawne, at 
Drypool Church in October, 1650. 






n 







4*- 



* ' 



DRYPOOL IN SWINE. 77 

of the family. In 1665, Mr. Thomas Watson,, of Stone- 
ferry, who got Sir Philip Constable's share in the manor 
of Sutton, left the manorial rights to his sister's son, 
George Bromfleet, with all the privileges of the Courts, &c. 
Although he only got therewith a piece of ancient pasture 
ground, he was, as Sir Philip Constable had been, "a third 
lord in Sutton." In 1676, George Bromfleet joined with 
John Dalton, who owned a portion of the manor of Sutton, 
as well as the Hastings Manor, in granting to the Mayor 
and Burgesses of Hull liberty to set down posts and stoopes 
on Sutton Side for fastening such ships as should be drawn 
beyond the North Bridge. His share in the manor passed, 
by purchase, from his representatives to Charles Pool, Senior, 
and through the family of Mason to Mr. R. C. Broadley. 
Charles Pool acquired from the same source the tithes of 
Drypool and Southcoates.* 

North-west of Church Street is a block of property, 
bounded, by St. Quintin's Place, close to the old course of 
Summergangs Dike. This was associated with a smaller 
piece to the north of Popple's crofts. Wills of the family of 
St. Quintin, long resident in Drypool, shew that it was in that 
family in 1729, when it consisted of a dwelling-house and 

* The lands and tithes belonging to George Bromfleet, who died in 
1703, were inherited by his son, Henry. His heir was his uncle, Samuel 
Bromfleet, whose coheirs were the sisters. Consolation Lyth, spinster 
(who in 1 710 sold her share to Thomas Eyres), and Jane, the wife of 
Noah EUerthorpe. In 171 7, both shares were bought by Charles Pool, 
whose son, Charles Pool the younger, brought about the enclosure of the 
spacious fields and commons in Southcoates and Sutton. This with 
much of Pool's property passed to the family of Broadley. 



78 EVIDENCES RELATING TO EAST HULL. 

garth, with two **pickels," and one free common on Summer- 
games. Pickel here means pightle, a sheepcot or enclosure 
in the meadows. In 1781, William St. Quintin left the 
property to his sisters for life, and afterwards to a boy named 
William St. Quintin. In course of time it became covered 
with streets and houses^ which are now being partially 
cleared away. 

Hardly any of the places named in the records of old 
times would now be recognisable by the thinly scattered 
population of the cowkeepers and shepherds that were their 
chief occupiers. Building is reaching Stoneferry and pro- 
gressing towards Sutton. The Humber Field and the Kirke 
Field, with much of the South Ings and the Arn^escroft have 
been appropriated, and the eastern docks have driven back 
the Humber tides. Streets and terraces of houses, such as 
have occupied all the western parts of the Summergangs, 
are now invading the grass lands of the West Field, while 
far away beyond the East Field, streets were, years ago, 
prematurely laid out. Electric Tramways having been 
carried beyond the East Park, with probable extensions 
eastward and northward the time cannot be far distant when 
all the old historic sites and landmarks within the eastern 
boundries of the City will be known only from old records. 

The western part of the City is now being intersected by 
noble avenues ; soon the Holderness Road will be continued 
by a straight thoroughfare leading to the centre of it's com- 
merce and the centre of its Municipal life. The " Groves " 
will be intersected by a thoroughfare as necessary for bright- 



DRYPOOL IN SWINE. 79 

ing the dull places of that oddly named locality as for the 
convenience of its trade. Then the narrow, crooked and 
squalid rows and lanes throug^h which the growing* traffic 
has struggled, will give place to fitting and dignified means 
of approach to the City of Kingston-upon-Hull. 



INDEX. 



»» 



>» 



Albemarle, Isabella, Countess 

of, 27, 41 
Alford fam., 39, 56 
Alured, Alrede or Aldred fam., 

4^ 53» 70 
Ankedam dike, 53 

Antholme dike, 53 

Antigallican Tavern, 15 

Amescroft meadow, 65, 70, 72 

Auction by sandglass, 19 

Berewic in Sutton, 8, 9 

Sudcoats, 10, II 
Dripole, 10, 21, 42 
Beverley, College of St. John, 

8,42 
Blassell, Robt., 69, 71 
Blaides fam., 12, 72 
Blockhouse, North, 11, 13, 73 

„ South, 73 

Blockhouse Close, 12, 72 

Lane, 11, 12 

Mill, II, 63 
Broadley fam., 13, 26, 35, 62, 77 
Bromflete fam., 67, 73, 76, 77 
Browning, Eliz. Barrett, 63 
Brick Kilns, 15 
Bridge foot, 11, 13, 14 
Bu reels, Bursilland, 47, 53 
Burial in Woollen, 19 
Burton fam., 17, 20, 21 

Countess Croft, 41 
Catherine, Queen of Charles 1 1 ,44 
Chest, ancient, 17 



»» 



»» 



»» 



»» 



Chimney lands, 48 
Clough Dike, 61 

,, Field, 18, 20 
CoUings, fam., 12, 13, 14 
Commons, stinted and free, 60 
Constable, Sir John, 41, 71 

Sir Marmaduke, 34 
Sir Philip, 34, 59, 77 
Cooper, Spyvee, 18 
Coraepasture, 49 
Carthusians, Hull, 38, 68 

Dailes, 39 

Dalton fam., 13, 26, 59 

Dansom lane, 14, 60 

Davie, heiresses, 57 

Dripole in Sutton, 10, 11, 12, 13, 

in Swine, 64 

Field, II, 20, 53, 64 

West-field, 65 

Manorand Berewic, 10,42 

Church, 18, 64 

Grange, 69, 70 
Dripole-gote, 12, 68 
Drypool with Southcoates, 7 
Dudley, Duke of Northumber- 
land, 39 
,, Earl of Leicester, 39 

Edward L, 29 
Embankments, 7 
Ember Garth, 59 
Enclosure of Fields, 59, 61 
Ewelands, 48 

F