Skip to main content

Full text of "An examination of the charter and proceedings of the Hudson's Bay company, with reference to the grant of Vancouver's Island"

See other formats


AT   LOS  ANGELES 


THB 


HUDSON'S  BAY  COMPANY 


VANCOUVER'S  ISLAND. 


Digitized  by  tlie  Internet  Arcliive 

in  2007  witli  funding  from 

IVIicrosoft  CJorporation 


littp://www.archive.org/details/examinationofchaOOfitziala 


IrUioniey  .Sautuifni 


•rvi^r^vtt.loiuiU*  JiOV^J&f^ 


.  \ 


0=^'"  AN  EXAMINATION 


CHARTER   AND    PROCEEDINGS 


HUDSON'S  BAT  COMPAM, 


WITH  HEFEBENCE  TO  THE  GRANT  OF 


YANCOUYER'S  ISLAND. 


BT 

JAMES  EDWARD  FITZGERALD. 


'  Ubi  lolitadmem  faciunt,  pacem  appellant." — Tacit.  Agrie. 


LONDON: 
TRELAWNEY  SAUNDERS,  6,  Charing  Cross. 

1849.  . 


CONTENTS. 


Page 

Dedicatory  Letter  to  the  Right  Honorable  William 

Ewart  Gladstone,  M.P vii 


Chapter  I. 

A  Statement  of  some  recent  Occurrences,  in  rela- 
tion to    the  Hudson's    Bay    Company    and 
<5         Vancouver's  Island 1 

>^  Chapter  II. 

g  Of  the  Charter  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  in 
Zj  respect  to  the  Validity  of  the  Grant  of  the  Soil 
^  of  Rupert's  Land 21 


Chapter  III. 

Of  the  Charter  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  in 
respect  to  the  Validity  of  the  Grant  of  the 
Right  of  Exclusive  Trade  with  Rupert's  Land    60 

Chapter  IV. 

Of  the  Charter  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  in 
respect  to  the  Validity  of  the  Grant  of  the  Right 
of  Exclusive  Trade  with  the  Indian  Territories     85 


27650" 


VI  CONTENTS. 

Chapter  V. 

Page 
Of  the  Charter  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  in 
respect  to  the  recognition  which  it  has  received 
from  Acts  of  Parliament,  and  other  public 
Documents 92 

Chapter  VL 

Of  the  Results  of  the  Charter  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company,  as  affecting  the  Interests  of  the 
Mother  Country 105 

Chapter  VII. 

Of  the  Results  of  the  Charter  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company,  as  affecting  the  Int  rests  of  the 
Native  Indian  Population  of  the  Company's 
Territories 134 

Chapter  VIII. 

Of  the  Results  of  the  Charter  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company,  as  affecting  the  Colonists  who  are 
subjected  to  its  influence 199 

Chapter  IX. 

Vancouver's   Island  : — What  it  will  be — what  it 

might  have  been 245 

Conclusion 281 


DEDICATORY  LETTER 

TO  THE   HIOUT    HONOURABLE 

WILLIAM   EWART   GLADSTONE,   M.P., 

t[C.      tfC. 

Sir, 

When  a  work  appears  from  the  pen 
of  an  able  advocate,  containing  an  elaborate 
reply  to  all  the  charges  which  have  been 
made  against  his  clients,  written  under  the 
manifest  patronage  of  the  highest  authority, 
and  in  the  enjoyment  of  all  the  information 
which  such  patronage  alone  can  supply, 
there  is  one  very  satisfactory  light  in  which 
to  view  such  a  publication, — viz.,  that  we 
are  at  last  in  possession  of  the  whole  defence 
which  can  be  made. 

For  this  reason,  those  who  doubted  the 
expediency  of  granting  Vancouver's  Island 
to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  hailed  with 


VUl  DEDICATORY    LETTER. 

pleasure  the  appearance  of  the  book  which 
has  lately  been  published,  under  the  name 
of  Mr.  R.  Montgomery  Martin,  entitled, 
"  The  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  Territories 
and  Vancouver's  Island;"  because  they  could 
not  regard  it  as  other  than  a  statement,  by 
authority,  of  all  the  grounds  upon  which 
the  character  of  that  Company,  and  the 
policy  of  the  Colonial  Minister  respecting 
it,  are  to  be  defended. 

It  seemed  right,  however,  that  the  state- 
ments put  forward  by  Mr.  M.  Martin  should 
not  be  allowed  to  remain  unanswered.  I 
have  therefore  thrown  together,  in  the  fol- 
lowing pages,  those  facts  and  arguments 
which  appear  to  cast  discredit  upon  such 
statements;  and  I  have  arranged  them  in 
that  order  which  seemed  to  me  clear  and 
logical,  in  several  chapters,  as  follows : — 

I.  A  statement  of  recent  occurrences  in  con- 
nection with  the  discussion  of  this  question. 


DEDICATORY    LETTER.  IX 

II.  An  investigation  into  the  nature  and 
validity  of  the  several  grants  contained  in 
the  Charter  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
viz. : — 

1.  The  grant  of  the  soil  of  Rupert's  Land. 

2.  The  grant  of  the  right  of  exclusive 

trade  throughout  Rupert's  Land. 

3.  The  grant  of  the  right  of   exclusive 

trade  throughout  the  Indian  Terri- 
tories. 

4.  The  mention  which  has  been  made  of 

the  Charter  in  Acts  of  Parliament, 
and  in  other  public  documents,  as 
affecting  its  validity. 

III.  The  results  of  the  Charter  in  the 
influence  which  it  has  exercised  severally 
upon 

1.  The  Mother  Country. 

2.  The  Native  Indian  population. 

3.  The  Colonists  and  Settlers  in  the  ter- 

ritories over  which  it  extends. 


DEDICATORY    LETTER. 


IV.  The  future  prosperity  of  Vancouver's 
Island. 

V.  Some  concluding  observations. 

I  anticipate  that  a  perusal  of  the  follow- 
ing pages  will  leave  upon  the  mind  of  the 
reader  a  strong  suspicion  that  the  represent- 
ations which  have  been  made,  are  neither 
fair  nor  true ;  and  the  conviction  that  a 
policy  which  tends  to  give  any  validity  to 
the  pretensions  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany, or  in  any  manner  to  strengthen  and 
perpetuate  its  authority,  is  unwise  and  rash 
in  the  highest  possible  degree. 

At  the  same  time,  I  am  sure  that  all  who 
have  assisted  in  bringing  the  character  and 
conduct  of  the  Company  under  the  notice  of 
the  public,  will  rejoice  to  see  the  suspicion 
under  which  they  lie  cleared  away;  and 
that  none  would  participate  in  that  feel- 
ing more  entirely  than  yourself.  But  in 
whatever   manner   the   Company    may   be 


DEDICATORY    LETTER.  XI 

shewn  to  have  exercised  their  powers  and 
privileges,  the  conclusion  at  which  I  have 
been  compelled  to  arrive,  by  the  investiga- 
tions into  which  I  have  been  led  in  the 
course  of  this  work,  will  remain  unchanged, 
viz.,  that  the  powers  and  privileges  of  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company,  are,  for  the  most 
part,  in  direct  opposition  to  the  laws  of  this 
country. 

At  a  time  when  the  attention  of  all 
thinking  men  is  directed  to  the  commercial 
and  colonial  policy  of  the  empire,  it  is  im- 
possible that  a  Corporation  can  escape  notice 
whose  principles  and  conduct  are  diametri- 
cally opposed  to  those  doctrines  and  theories 
which  it  seems  to  be  the  great  task  of  our 
age  to  develope  and  to  carry  into  action. 

Were  the  privileges  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  unquestionable,  it  would  still  be 
a  matter  of  doubt,  whether  the  consistent 
working   out   of  the  principles  of  the  age 


Xll  DEDICATORY    LETTER. 


would  not  necessitate  their  extermination  ; 
especially  as  there  are  precedents  for  the 
resumption  of  such  powers,  from  a  mul- 
titude of  companies  of  precisely  a  similar 
character,  when  those  powers  and  privi- 
leges were  found  to  be  incompatible  with 
the  general  weal ;  but  if  it  can  be  shewn 
that  these  claims  are  altogether,  and  upon 
several  distinct  grounds,  fictitious  and  il- 
legal ;  and  if,  in  addition,  it  can  be  estab- 
lished that  the  result  of  the  exercise  of  such 
illegal  power  has  been  of  serious  detri- 
ment, both  to  this  country  and  to  the  terri- 
tories over  which  it  extends,  then  I  can  see  no 
reason  why  we  should  any  longer  tolerate  a 
usurped  and  mischievous  authority  ;  or,  why 
we  should  hesitate  to  put  the  countries  now 
under  its  sway,  upon  a  better  social,  com- 
mercial, and  political  system.  Englishmen 
will  ever  contemplate  with  reluctance  the 
overthrow    of  an  ancient  Corporation ;  but 


DEDICATORY   LETTER.  xiu 

that  feeling  will  scarcely  quell  their  indigna- 
tion upon  learning  the  fraud  which  has  been 
so  long  practised  upon  their  country. 

I  think  it  right  to  add,  that  I  am  not 
responsible  for  the  truth  of  all  that  is  here 
stated.  The  question  is,  in  a  great  measure, 
one  of  authority,  in  which  testimony  must 
be  taken  for  what  it  is  worth  ;  it  is  one, 
moreover,  in  which  it  is  extremely  difficult 
to  arrive  at  any  independent  and  unbiassed 
information. 

But  this  much  is  certain,  that  there  is 
enough  (and  this,  too,  from  the  evidence  of 
its  own  servants  and  agents),  to  cast  a  very 
strong  suspicion  upon  the  Company  of  having 
grossly  abused  its  powers :  there  is  enough 
to  justify  the  demand,  for  a  complete  and 
impartial  investigation  into  the  proceedings 
of  the  Company :  there  is  enough  to  con- 
demn the  attempt  to  invest  it  with  additional 
powers. 


XIV  DEDICATORY    LETTER. 

I  should  be  guilty  of  an  injustice,  if  1  were 
to  neglect  this  opportunity  of  acknowledging 
how  largely  I  am  indebted  to  Mr.  Isbister, 
for  his  assistance  and  information  in  drawing: 
up  the  following  statement,  and  to  the  inti- 
mate acquaintance  which  he  possesses  with 
the  proceedings  carried  on  in  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company's  territories,  a  very  large  part 
of  which  he  has  himself  traversed.  For  the 
beneficial  results  which  must  ensue  from  the 
public  interest  being  attracted  to  the  subject, 
the  settlers,  as  well  as  the  native  population, 
will  owe  much  to  the  unwearied  exertions  of 
that  gentleman. 

The  interest  which  you  took,  during  the 
last  Session  of  Parliament,  in  the  question 
which  is  the  subject  of  the  following  pages, 
will,  I  hope,  be  accepted  as  a  sufficient 
apology  for  having  ventured  to  connect  your 
name  with  so  humble  a  performance.  If 
more  were  needed,  I  should  seek  it  in  the 


DEDICATORY   LETTER.  XV 

sympathy  you  have  ever  displayed  with  any 
effort,  however  humble,  to  vindicate  the 
rights  of  the  oppressed,  and  to  extend  the 
influence  of  those  sacred  principles  of  reli- 
gion, of  liberty,  and  of  law,  by  which  the 
foundations  of  this  empire  have  been  laid, 
and  by  which  alone  its  greatness  is  pre- 
served. 

It  is,  Sir,  only  in  the  hope  that  it  may,  in 
however  small  a  degree,  advance  the  cause 
of  truth  and  of  civilization,  that  this  book  is 
presented  to  you,  with  the  greatest  respect, 
by 

Your  most  obedient  and 

most  humble  Servant, 
James  Edward  Fitzgerald. 

London,  Feb.  1,  1849. 


CHAPTER  I. 


A  STATEMENT  OF  SOME  RECENT  OCCURRENCES 
IN  RELATION  TO  THE  HUDSOn's  BAY  COM- 
PANY AND  Vancouver's  island. 

During  the  last  Session  of  Parliament,  rumours 
went  about  that  it  was  the  intention  of  Her  Ma- 
jesty's Government  to  grant  Vancouver's  Island  to 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  with  a  view  to  found- 
ing a  colony  there. 

There  were  several  public  men  who  doubted 
whether  such  a  Corporation  as  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  were  likely  to  colonize  effectually ; 
whether  the  very  nature  of  their  constitution,  and 
the  character  of  their  operations,  would  not  forbid 
their  doing  so ;  and,  more  than  this,  whether  they 
have  not  a  direct  interest  in  preventing  Coloniza- 
tion, from  the  fear  that  the  peculiar  monopoly  of 
the  fur  trade,  which  they  possess,  might  be  practi- 
cally endangered  by  a  colony  in  any  part  of  the 
country  ; — because  the  collection  of  the  natives  into 
villages,  which  would  be  the  tendency  of  a  colony, 
and  the   communication    to  them  of  agricultural 

B 


Z  PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT. 

tastes  and  habits,  in  however  small  a  degree, 
would  interfere  with  their  occupation  as  hunters 
and  trappers  ; — in  fine,  whether  it  were  common 
sense  to  expect  that  the  task  of  civilizing  and 
settling  a  country,  should  be  entrusted  to  those 
whose  obvious  interest  it  is  to  keep  it  wild  and 
uncultivated. 

But,  besides  this,  it  was  within  the  recollection  of 
those  who  had  taken  any  interest  in  the  matter,  that 
the  colonists  of  the  Red  River  settlement,  the  only 
colony  within  the  dominions  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company,  and  which  is  entirely  under  its  govern- 
ment, had,  not  very  long  before,  expressed  great 
dissatisfaction  at  the  rule  to  which  they  were  sub- 
ject ;  and  that  they  had  sent  over  a  petition,  signed 
by  almost  all  the  adult  male  population  of  the  set- 
tlement, praying  that  Her  Majesty  would  be  pleased 
to  inquire  into  the  nature  of  the  government 
exercised  over  them,  and  stating  many  grievances 
to  which  they  were  subject,  and  from  which  they 
prayed  to  be  relieved. 

The  charges  made  by  the  settlers  of  the  Red 
River  against  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  were 
referred  by  the  Colonial  Office  to  the  Governor  of 
the  Company  for  a  report  thereon.  That  Report 
was  considered  by  Earl  Grey  to  be  so  far  from 


PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT.  3 

satisfactory,  that  the  matter  was  referred  to  Lord 
Elgin,  the  Governor  of  Canada. 

\Miat  Lord  Elgin's  answer  was,  is  a  mystery. 
That  one  sentence  in  his  Lordship's  despatch  was 
favom'able  to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  we  know, 
because  Lord  Grey  and  Mr.  Hawes  traded  upon  it 
to  the  utmost  in  Parliamentary  debates  respecting 
this  question ;  but  what  was  the  whole  tenor  and 
bearing  of  Lord  Elgin's  opinion,  it  is  impossible  to 
say,  when  the  Colonial  Minister  has  declared  it  to 
be  a  principle  of  his  administration  to  quote  only 
such  parts  of  documents  in  his  possession  as  make 
out  his  own  case. 

But  whatever  Lord  Elgin's  opinion  may  be,  the 
Colonial  Office  do  not  appear  to  have  been  satisfied 
with  it :  for  a  commission  was  appointed  to  inquire, 
on  the  spot,  into  the  charges  made  against  the 
government  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company.  But, 
as  if  in  utter  mockery  of  all  common  sense  and 
common  decency,  tlie  person  appointed  to  make  the 
inquiry  was  appointed,  at  the  same  time,  Lieutenant- 
Governor  of  the  Colony,  and  thus  became  a  paid 
ofiicer  of  the  Corporation  into  whose  administration 
he  was  to  make  an  inquiry. 

These  being  the  facts  of  the  case,  the  question 
was  put  in  the  House  of  Commons,  by  Lord  Lin- 

b2 


4  PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT. 

coin,  "  Are  you  going  to  make  a  grant  of  additional 
territory,  and  of  increased  powers,  to  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company,  at  a  time  when  serious  charges  are 
pending  against  that  Company  for  maladministration 
of  the  countries  at  present  under  their  sway,  and 
before  you  have  received  a  Report  from  the  Commis- 
sioner you  have  appointed  to  inquire  into  the  truth 
of  those  charges  ?  " 

The  Colonial  Minister  admitted  that  such  charges 
were  before  him ;  that  a  final  Report  had  not  yet 
been  made  by  the  Commissioner  whom  he  had 
appointed ;  and  that  he  had,  nevertheless,  deter- 
mined to  make  the  grant  of  Vancouver's  Island  to 
the  Company. 

In  order  to  shew  the  grounds  on  which  this  extra- 
ordinary decision  was  founded,  some  papers  were 
laid  before  Parliament,  containing  extracts  from  the 
correspondence  which  had  taken  place  with  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company,  and  also  a  draft  of  the 
Charter  which  it  was  proposed  to  make,  granting 
Vancouver's  Island  to  them. 

Upon  this  a  motion  was  made  for  an  address  to 
Her  Majesty,  praying  that  the  grant  might  be 
postponed,  until  the  question  were  finally  settled, 
as  to  how  the  Company  had  wielded  the  vast 
powers  already  committed  to  them,  and  whether 


PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT.  0 

they  were  fit  to  be  entrusted  with  any  fresh  respon- 
sibility. 

Close  to  the  end  of  the  Session,  when  few  but  the 
supporters  of  Government  are  in  town,  in  the 
absence  of  some  of  those  chiefly  interested  in  the 
question,  and  in  a  house  of  100  members,  the 
Government  only  escaped  being  beaten  by  a  ma- 
jority of  16  :  so  feeble  was  the  ground  upon  which 
they  had  to  stand. 

Upon  this  occasion  Mr.  Gladstone  made  a  speech, 
in  which  he  went  into  the  history  and  dealings  of 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  shewing  that  they 
were  not  qualified  to  possess  the  privileges  with 
which  it  was  proposed  to  invest  them. 

That  speech  has  remained  unanswered  until  now. 
The  Charter  to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  was 
referred  to  the  Committee  of  the  Privy  Council, 
and  there  is  no  information  before  the  public  as  to 
whether  it  has  been  completed  or  not.  There  is, 
moreover,  another  motion  standing  over  till  this 
Session,  for  an  address  to  the  Crown,  praying  Her 
Majesty  to  refuse  the  grant  proposed. 

Now  the  case  stood  thus,  to  wit,  that  Her  Ma- 
jesty's Government  had  made  up  their  minds  to  a 
certain  course  of  conduct,  right  or  wrong ; — that  a 
powerful  and  unanswered  manifesto  was  before  the 


b  PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT. 

public,  condemning  the  policy  proposed ; — that  all 
the  leading  public  journals  had  taken  up  the  ques- 
tion against  the  Government ; — that  the  Chamber  of 
Commerce  at  Manchester  had  thought  it  worth  their 
while  to  send  up  a  strong  remonstrance  against  the 
course  proposed ; — that  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
had  not  as  yet  made  any  reply  whatever  to  the 
charges  brojjlght  against  them :  the  case  stood  thus, 
when  a  few  weeks  ago  a  book  appeared,  under  the 
name  of  Mr,  Montgomery  Martin,  containing  an 
elaborate  defence  of  the  conduct  and  character  of 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  and  of  the  policy  of 
the  Colonial  Minister  respecting  it. 

There  is  only  one  light  in  which  Mr.  M.  Martin's 
work  upon  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  can  be 
viewed  as  of  sufficient  importance  to  demand  any 
notice  or  reply, — and  that  is  its  palpably  official 
character. 

The  author  seems  to  have  been  furnished,  both 
by  Her  Majesty's  Government  and  by  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company,  with  every  document  which  could 
facilitate  his  endeavour  to  make  out  a  case  in  their 
favour.  The  work  must  therefore  be  treated  en- 
tirely as  an  official  manifesto. 

But  it  is  especially  worthy  of  remark,  that  several 
papers  are  printed  in  Mr.  Martin's  book  which  were 


PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT.  7 

ordered  last  Session  to  be  returned  to  the  House  of 
Commons,  but  of  which  no  return  was  made. 
There  was  no  reason  why  these  papers  should  not 
have  been  returned  at  once,  had  there  been  any 
real  intention  on  the  part  of  the  Colonial  Office 
to  afford  the  information  required.  It  seems, 
however,  that  it  was  thought  better  to  withhold 
them  until  they  could  appear  along  with  the 
complete  defence  upon  which  the  Company  and  the 
Colonial  Office  intend  to  rely.  This  is,  to  say  the 
least,  an  unprecedented  proceeding. 

One  of  these  papers,  a  Report  from  Captain 
Gordon,  late  of  H.M.S.  Cormorant,  respecting  tlie 
coal  in  Vancouver's  Island,  Mr.  Martin  ushers  in  with 
the  observation  that  Captain  Gordon  "  has  expressed 
a  decided  opinion  in  favom*  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company,  with  whose  proceedings  he  was  well  ac- 
quainted." As  this  question  has  become,  in  a  great 
measure,  one  of  authority,  it  is  necessary  to  state 
that  Captain  Gordon  has  never  expressed  any 
opinion  of  the  kind.  It  would  probably  be  difficult 
to  find  any  officer  who  has  been  on  that  coast  who 
would  express  such  an  opinion.  The  Colonial  Minister 
is  at  any  rate  perfectly  aware  that  some  officers 
who  have  been  on  that  coast,  have  taken,  and  ex- 
pressed in  the  strongest  terms,  a  contrary  view. 


8  PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT. 

The  largest  portion  of  the  publication  referred 
to  consists  of  quotations  from  various  authors,  with 
the  object  of  proving  the  generosity  and  benevo- 
lence of  the  Company  towards  the  native  Indian 
population,  and  the  mildness  and  justice  of  its 
government  towards  all  who  are  subjected  to  its 
sway. 

A  large  array  of  authorities  is  adduced,  to  prop 
up  the  character  of  the  Company  against  the 
attacks  which  it  has  recently  received  ;  and  the 
inference  intended  to  be  drawn  is  this, — that  the 
Company  has  well  and  wisely  used  the  powers  that 
it  has  possessed,  for  the  benefit,  equally  of  this 
country,  and  of  that  over  which  those  powers 
extend. 

The  Hudson's  Bay  Company  have  made  the 
question  one  of  authority,  and  they  have  based  their 
case  upon  the  testimony  of  the  following  works  : — 

1.  The  Report  of  the  Aborigines  Parliamentary 
Committee  in  1837. 

2.  The  Journal  of  the  Bishop  of  Montreal  to 
the  Red  River,  in  1844. 

3.  The  Annual  Reports  of  the  Church  Mission- 
ary and  Wesleyan  Missionary  Societies. 

4.  The  official  Narrative  of  Commodore  Wilkes, 
U.N.S.,  from  1838  to  1842. 


PRELIMINARY   STATEMENT.  V 

5.  The  History  of  Oregon  and  California,  by 
Mr.  Robert  Greenhow. 

6.  A  Journey  beyond  the  Rocky  Mountains,  in 
1835,  6,  7,  by  the  Rev.  S.  Parker,  A.M. 

7.  A  Statement  of  the  Earl  of  Selkirk's  Settle- 
ment in  North  America. 

8.  Narrative  of  the  Discoveries  on  the  North 
Coast  of  America,  1836-9,  by  Messrs.  Dease  and 
T.  Simpson. 

9.  Heame's  Journeys  to  the  Northern  Ocean, 
1769-72. 

10.  Dr.  Rae's  Exploration  of  the  Coasts  of  the 
Arctic  Regions. 

11.  Sir  George  Simpson's  Overland  Journey 
round  the  World  m  1841-2. 

Now  we  may  assume  that  everything  which  can 
be  stated  in  favour  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
has  been  brought  together,  from  every  source  from 
which  any  such  favourable  testimony  was  to  be 
derived.  How  much  has  been  suppressed  which 
afforded  testimony  of  another  description,  we  shall 
presently  see.  Of  the  above  writings,  however,  we 
may  remark  in  the  first  instance,  that  Commodore 
AVilkes,  Mr.  Greenhow,  and  Mr.  Parker,  were 
Americans,  and  all  the  rest  were  servants  of  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company,  with  the  exception  of  the 


10  PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT. 

Bishop  of  Montreal.  From  the  Bishop's  Journal, 
as  well  as  from  the  Aborigines  Committee,  and 
from  the  Reports  of  the  Chm-ch  and  Wesleyan 
Missionary  Societies,  we  shall  have  to  derive  inform- 
ation of  a  very  different  character  from  that  sug- 
gested by  the  quotations  in  Mr.  Martin's  book.  It 
is  imnecessary,  of  course,  to  say  that  in  a  case 
where  the  character  of  themselves  and  of  their 
masters  is  concerned,  evidence  from  the  servants 
of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  cannot  be  taken 
without  suspicion,  if  not  of  an  intention  to  deceive,  at 
any  rate  of  so  strong  bias  in  their  own  favour  as 
entirely  to  destroy  its  value.  We  shall,  however, 
be  able  to  gather  quite  enough  from  the  writings  of 
these  gentlemen  to  alter  the  view  which  has  been 
laid  before  the  public. 

It  is  most  important  to  bear  in  mind  the 
relative  value  which  must  attach  to  evidence  from 
different  quarters,  on  a  question  of  this  nature. 
The  power  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  over 
hundreds  of  thousands  of  miles  of  the  North  Ame- 
rican continent  is  unlimited.  Into  those  remote 
regions  few  ever  penetrate  but  the  servants  of  the 
Company.  There  is  hardly  a  possibility  of  obtain- 
ing any  evidence  whatsoever,  which  does  not  come 
in  some  way  through  their  hands,  and  which  is  not 


PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT.  11 

more  or  less  tainted  by  the  transmission.  The  iron 
rule  which  the  Company  holds  over  its  servants  and 
agents,  and  the  subtle  policy  which  has  ever  charac- 
terised its  government,  have  kept  those  regions  almost 
beyond  the  knowledge  of  the  civilised  world,  or  of 
any  but  the  few  who  guide  the  afiairs  and  transact 
the  business  of  the  Company.  While,  then,  nothing 
would  be,  apparently,  more  easy  than  to  array  a  host  of 
witnesses  in  favour  of  the  operations  of  the  Company, 
it  would  not  be  a  matter  of  surprise  if  little  or  no 
evidence  could  be  obtained  to  dispute  such  testi- 
mony ;  and  additional  weight  must  be  attached  to 
those  incidental  notices  which  can  be  gathered 
here  and  there,  and  which  throw  a  glimmering  and 
suspicious  light  on  the  whole  of  the  Company's 
transactions. 

Of  the  American  writers  to  whose  testimony  so 
much  weight  has  been  attached,  it  is  as  well  to  know 
that  they  had  good  reasons  for  forming  a  favourable 
opinion  of  the  operations  of  the  Company. 

Whatever  may  be  the  justice  of  the  claim  which 
the  Company  assert,  to  the  gratitude  of  the  Indian 
races,  and  of  the  settlers  in  their  territories,  the 
United  States  have,  at  any  rate,  a  debt,  which  they 
seem  inclined  to  acknowledge,  as  long  as  the  pay- 
ment can  be  made  in  nothing  more  valuable  than 


12  PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT. 

words.  We  shall  presently  see  of  how  much  use 
the  Company  was  to  this  country,  in  the  settlement 
of  the  boundary  to  the  westward  of  Lake  Superior  ; 
and  that,  had  that  Corporation  asserted  the  privi- 
leges of  their  Charter  against  American  claims,  as 
vigorously  as  they  have  ever  opposed  them  to  Bri- 
tish liberties,  the  boundary  between  the  United 
States  and  British  North  America  would  never 
have  been  settled  along  the  49th  parallel. 

It  has  often  been  asserted,  and  is  to  a  great 
extent  believed,  because  there  is  very  little  general 
information  on  this  subject,  that  the  claim  which 
Great  Britain  made  to  the  Oregon  territory  was 
dependent  upon,  or,  at  any  rate,  strengthened  by, 
the  settlements  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  on 
the  Columbia  River. 

Those  who  hold  such  an  opinion  will  be  surprised 
to  learn  that  there  are  many — and  they  well  ac- 
quainted with  the  country  itself — who  assert  that 
the  conduct  and  policy  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany in  the  Oregon  territory  formed  the  chief 
part  of  the  title  which  the  United  States  had  to 
the  country  which  was  gratuitously  given  to  her  by 
the  settlement  of  the  boundary.  What  the  United 
States  owe  to  the  Company  for  its  policy  on  the 
west  side  of  the  Rocky  Mountains,  is  a  question  to 


PRELIMINARY   STATEMENT.  13 

which  the  English  public  will  some  day  demand 
a  satisfactory  answer.  But  it  is"  right  that  the 
public  should  know  what  the  Company  are  charged 
with  having  done  in  those  parts. 

Dr.  M'Laughlin  was  formerly  an  Agent  in  the 
North  West  Fur  Company  of  Montreal ;  he  was 
one  of  the  most  enterprising  and  active  in  conduct- 
ing the  war  between  that  Association  and  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company.  In  the  year  1821,  when 
the  rival  companies  united,  Dr.  M'Laughlin  became 
a  factor  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company.  But  his 
allegiance  does  not  appear  to  have  been  disposed 
of  along  with  his  interests  ;  and  his  sympathy  with 
anything  other  than  British,  seems  to  have  done 
justice  to  his  birth  and  education,  wliich  were  those 
of  a  French  Canadian. 

This  gentleman  was  appointed  Governor  of  all 
the  country  west  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  ;  and  is 
accused,  by  those  who  have  been  in  that  country,  of 
having  uniformly  encouraged  the  emigration  of 
settlers  from  the  United  States,  and  of  having  dis- 
couraged that  of  British  subjects. 

While  the  Company  in  this  country  were  assert- 
ing that  their  settlements  on  the  Columbia  River 
were  giving  validity  to  the  claim  of  Great  Britain  to 
the  Oregon  territory,   it  appears,  that  their  chief 


14  PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT. 

officer  on  the  spot  was  doing  all  in  his  power  to 
facilitate  the  operations  of  those,  whose  whole  ob- 
ject it  was  to  annihilate  that  claim  altogether. 

There  is  one  story  told,  about  which  it  is  right 
that  the  truth  should  be  ascertained.  It  is  said 
that  a  number  of  half-breds  from  the  Red  River 
settlement  were,  in  the  year  1841,  induced  by  the 
Company's  officers  to  undertake  a  journey  entirely 
across  the  continent,  with  the  object  of  becoming 
settlers  on  the  Columbia  River. 

It  appears  that  a  number  went,  but  on  arriving 
in  the  country,  so  far  from  finding  any  of  the  pro- 
mised encouragement,  the  treatment  they  received 
from  Dr.  M'Laughlin  was  such,  that,  after  having 
been  nearly  starved  under  the  paternal  care  of  that 
gentleman,  they  all  went  over  to  the  American  set- 
tlement on  the  Wallamatte  valley. 

These  emigrants  became  citizens  of  the  United 
States,  and,  it  is  further  said,  were  the  first  to 
memorialize  Congress  to  extend  the  power  of  the 
United  States  over  the  Oregon  territory. 

For  the  truth  of  these  statements  we  do  not  of 
course  vouch.   But  we  do  say  they  demand  inquiry. 

Dr.  M'Laughlin's  policy  was  so  manifestly 
American,  that  it  is  openly  canvassed  in  a  book 
written  by  Mr.  Dunn,  one  of  the  servants  of  the 


PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT.  15 

Company,  and  written  for  the  purpose  of  praising 

their  system  and  policy. 

Sir  Edward  Belcher  also  alludes  to  this  policy. 

He  says, — 

"  Some  few  years  since,  the  Company  determined  on 
forming  settlements  on  the  rich  lands  situated  on  the 
Wallamatte  and  other  rivers,  and  for  providing  for  their 
retired  servants  by  allotting  them  farms,  and  further 
aiding  them  by  supplies  of  cattle,  &c.  That  on  the 
Wallamatte  was  a  field  too  inviting  for  missionary 
enthusiasm  to  overlook ;  but  instead  of  selecting  a 
British  subject  to  afford  them  spiritual  assistance,  re- 
course was  had  to  Americans — a  course  pregnant  with 
evil  consequences,  and  particularly  in  the  political 
squabble  pending,  as  will  be  seen  by  the  result.  No 
sooner  had  the  American  and  his  allies  fairly  squatted, 
— (which  they  deem  taking  possession  of  the  country,) 
than  they  invited  their  brethren  to  join  them,  and 
called  on  the  American  Government  for  laws  and  pro- 
tection."* 

A  great  deal  of  importance  is  attached  to  the 
account  given  by  Commodore  Wilkes,  U.S.N.,  of 
the  operations  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  on 
the  north-west  coast ;  and  it  is  inferred  that  testi- 
mony, coming  from  such  a  quarter,  is  doubly  in 
favour  of  the  Company. 

Nothing,  indeed,  can  be  higher  than  the  terms  in 

*  Narrative  of  a  Voyage  round  the  World,  &c.,  by  Captain  Sir 
Edward  Belcher,  R.N.    London.    1843.     Vol.  i,,  p.  297. 


16  PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT. 

which  Captain  Wilkes  speaks  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company's  chief  factor,  Dr.  M'Laughlin,  and  of 
the  welcome  he  met,  and  the  hospitality  he  ex- 
perienced, dm'ing  his  stay  upon  the  coast. 

Captain  Wilkes  was  far  too  sensible  and  discrimi- 
nating a  man,  not  to  see,  plainly  enough,  whose 
game  Dr.  M'Laughlin  was  playing.  But  there  is 
something  strange,  if  we  turn  from  the  perusal  of 
Captain  Wnkes's  narrative,  and  the  description  of  the 
facilities  which  were  ever  afforded  him,  to  the  fol- 
lowing passage  from  Sir  Edward  Belcher's  voyage. 

The  difference  of  the  reception  which  a  frigate 
of  the  United  States  Navy  met  with,  from  that  which 
one  of  Her  Majesty's  ships  experienced,  is  a  most 
suspicious  fact,  as  suggesting  the  animus  of  the 
Company's  agents  upon  the  north-west  coast.  Sir 
Edward  Belcher  says, — 

"The  attention  of  the  Chief  to  myself,  and  those 
imnnediately  about  me,  particularly  in  sending-  down 
fresh  supplies,  previous  to  my  arrival,  I  feel  fully 
grateful  for  ;  but  I  cannot  conceal  my  disappointment 
at  the  want  of  accommodation  exhibited  towards  the 
crews  of  the  vessels  under  my  command,  in  a  British 
possession. 

"  We  certainly  were  not  distressed,  nor  was  it  im- 
peratively necessary  that  fresh  beef  and  vegetables 
should  be  supplied,  or  I  should  have  made  a  formal 
demand.  But  as  regarded  those  who  might  come  after, 
and   not    improbably  myself   among  the   number,    I 


PRELIMINARY   STATEMENT.  17 

inquired  in  direct  terms  what  facilities  Her  Majesty's 
ships  of  war  might  expect,  in  the  event  of  touching  at 
this  port  for  bullocks,  flour,  vegetables,  &c.  I  certainly 
was  extremely  surprised  at  the  reply,  that  '  they  were  not 
in  a  condition  to  supply.' 

"  As  any  observation  here  would  be  useless,  and  I 
well  knew  this  point  could  be  readily  settled,  where 
authority  could  be  referred  to,  I  let  the  matter  rest. 
But  having  been  invited  to  inspect  the  farm  and  dairy, 
and  been  informed  of  the  quantity  of  grain,  and  the 
means  of  furnishing  flour,  and  notwithstanding  the  pro- 
vision of  cattle  and  potatoes,  no  offer  having  been  made 
for  our  crew,  I  regretted  that  I  had  been  led  into  the 
acceptance  of  private  supplies ;  although,  at  that  time, 
the  other  officers  of  the  establishment  had  told  my 
officers  that  supplies  would,  of  course,  be  sent  down."* 

The  American  policy  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany would  seem  from  the  above  facts,  to  be  more 
than  a  matter  of  suspicion. 

It  is  very  easy  to  say,  these  are  all  idle  tales : 
they  are  tales — but  such  tales,  that  Parliament 
ought  to  make  a  searching  investigation  into  their 
truth.  This  much  at  least  is  certain ; — that  Dr. 
M'Laughlin  provided  for  himself  a  very  large  tract 
of  land,  on  what  title  no  one  knows  ;  that  he  formed 
a  considerable  farm  in  what  was  certain  to  become 
American  territory,  and  that  he  encouraged  the 
immigration  of  settlers  from  the  United  States,  well 
knowing  that  his  own  property  would  thus  be  raised 

*  Vol.  i.,  p.  296. 


18  PRELIMINARY    STATEMENT. 

in  value.  It  is  certain  that  he  has  now  left  the  Hud- 
son's Bay  Company,  and  has  become  nominally,  what 
he  seems  to  have  been  for  years,  really — ^an  American 
citizen,  living  in  the  midst  of  an  American  popula- 
tion, which  he  collected  round  him,  upon  soil,  to 
which  he  knew  that  his  own  country  had,  all  along, 
laid  claim. 

Nothing  but  a  Parliamentary  investigation  will 
thoroughly  test  the  value  of  these  rumours. 

It  was  necessary  to  state  the  above  view,  which 
many  who  are  acquainted  with  the  country  take,  in 
order  to  explain  why  American  writers  should  enter- 
tain a  favourable  opinion  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  ;  and  what  that  opinion  is  worth,  as  bear- 
ing on  the  question  before  us. 

With  respect  to  the  Bishop  of  Montreal's  evi- 
dence it  will  be  necessary  to  speak  hereafter ;  but 
it  must  not  be  forgotten  that  His  Lordship  was  never 
further  in  the  Company's  territories  than  the  Red 
River,  that  is,  on  the  extreme  verge  ;  and  that  all  his 
information  as  to  the  rest  of  the  country  was  derived 
from  what  the  servants  of  the  Company  told  him. 

And,  indeed,  there  is  scarcely  any  evidence  at  all 
laid. before  the  public  of  what  is  going  on  through- 
out the  whole  of  the  territories  under  the  Company's 
government.     For  nothing  can  be  more  false  than 


PRELIMINARY   STATEMENT.  19 

the  idea  that  the  condition  of  the  Red  River  Colony, 
or  of  the  settlements  on  the  north-west  coast,  affords 
any  information  of  what  is  going  on  throughout  the 
vast  continent  which  separates  those  two  localities, 
and  stretches  away  to  the  North  Pole. 

This  much  has  heen  said,  in  order  to  guard  those 
who  take  an  interest  in  this  question,  against  being 
imposed  upon  by  the  array  of  authority  which  has 
been  set  up,  in  order  to  blind  the  public  to  the  real 
character  of  that  system  of  iniquity  which  pervades 
the  whole  continent  of  North  America,  imder  the 
sway  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company. 

The  convictions  here  expressed  have  forced  them- 
selves upon  my  mind,  in  the  course  of  researches  which 
circumstances  induced  me  to  make,  in  spite  of  the 
belief  which  I  held  in  common  with  all  who  take 
for  granted  what  the  Company  put  forward  as  fact. 
They  are  convictions  which  have  strengthened  and 
deepened  at  every  step  of  the  inquiry ;  convic- 
tions that  the  system  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany has  entailed  misery  and  destruction  upon 
thousands  throughout  tlie  country,  which  is  wither- 
ing imder  its  curse ;  that  it  has  cramped  and 
crippled  the  energies  and  enterprise  of  England, 
which  might  have  found  occupation  in  the  direc- 
tions from  which  they  are  now  excluded  ;  that  it 

c2 


20  PRELIMINARY   STATEMENT. 

has  stopped  the  extension  of  civilization,  and  has 
excluded  the  light  of  religious  truth ;  that  it  has 
alienated  the  hearts  of  all  under  its  oppression,  and 
made  them  hostile  to  their  country  :  above  all,  that 
the  whole  and  entire  fabric  is  built  upon  utterly 
false  and  fictitious  grounds ;  that  it  has  not  one 
shadow  of  reality  in  law  or  in  justice  ;  that  there  is 
not  the  smallest  legal  authority  for  any  one  of  the 
rights  which  this  Corporation  claim.  It  is  this  con- 
viction which  has  urged  me  to  submit  the  state- 
ments and  arguments  contained  in  the  following 
pages  to  the  consideration  of  the  public,  and  to 
arraign  before  that  tribunal,  from  which  in  these 
days  there  is  no  escape — the  judgment  of  public 
opinion — a  Corporation,  who,  under  the  authority 
of  a  Charter  which  is  invalid  in  law,  hold  a  mono- 
poly in  commerce,  and  exercise  a  despotism  in 
government,  and  have  so  used  that  monopoly  and 
wielded  that  power,  as  to  shut  up  the  earth  from 
the  knowledge  of  man,  and  man  from  the  knowledge 
of  God. 


CHAPTER  II. 


OF  THE  CHARTER  OP  THE  HUDSON  S  BAY  COM- 
PANY, IN  RESPECT  TO  THE  VALIDITY  OF  THE 
GRANT  OF  THE  SOIL  OF  RUPERt's  LAND. 

There  are  three  subjects  which  must  be  noticed 
in  order : — 

First.  The  Charter  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company. 

Secondly.  The  evil  results  of  that  Charter. 

Thirdly.  The  extension  of  all  those  results  which 
which  will  follow  from  the  proposed  addition  of 
Vancouver's  Island  to  the  territories  of  the  Com- 
pany. 

The  present  and  three  following  chapters  will  be 
devoted  to  the  Charter  itself.  It  would  be  superfluous 
to  reprint  that  document  at  full  length  :  it  may  be 
found  in  the  Parliamentary  Paper,  547,  ordered  to 
be  printed  8th  August,  1842,  and  has  just  been  re- 
printed in  the  work  above  referred  to,  which  bears 
Mr.  M.  Martin's  name. 

It  must  be  admitted  that  the  criticisms  to  which 
it  has  lately  been  subjected,  have  not  deprived  it  of 
any  of  the  obscurity  which  it  has  ever  enjoyed,  and 


22  OF    THE   CHARTER. 

of  which  its  possessors  have  taken  such  wonderful 
advantage. 

This  mysterious  deed  is  now  held  up  to  our  ad- 
miration, and  we  are  expected  to  fall  down  and 
worship  it,  as  one  of  the  ancient  institutions  of  the 
country,  which  demands  all  the  respect  and  homage 
of  loyalty.  We  are  informed  that  all  the  rights, 
powers,  privileges,  and  possessions,  which  it  pro- 
fesses to  bestow,  are  as  much  the  property  of  the 
grantees,  as  any  property  which  an  Englishman 
calls  his  own  ;  we  are  further  told  that  this  Charter 
has  received  the  repeated  sanction  of  successive 
Sovereigns,  of  Parliament,  and  of  Foreign  States. 

We  shall  proceed  to  investigate  the  justice  of 
these  pretensions,  and  to  inquire  the  meaning 
and  object  of  the  Qiarter,  in  order  to  discover,  if 
possible,  to  what  extent  it  is  valid  and  legal,  and 
to  what  extent  a  presumptuous  and  mischievous 
usurpation. 

The  preamble  of  the  Charter  states  that  whereas 
certain  parties  had  "  at  their  own  cost  and  charges 
undertaken  an  expedition  for  Hudson's  Bay,  in  the 
north-west  part  of  America,  for  the  discovery  of  a 
new  passage  into  the  South  Sea,  and  for  finding 
some  trade  for  furs,  minerals,  and  other  consider- 
able commodities,  &c. :  Now  know  ye,  that,  we 


OF   THE    CHARTER.  23 

being  desirous  to  promote  all  endeavours  tending  to  the 
public  good  of  our  people,  and  to  encourage  tlie  said 
design,  have     *     *     granted,"  &c. 

The  end  and  object  of  this  Charter  being  granted 
is  clearly  set  forth.  It  is  for  the  promotion  of  the 
public  good,  and  for  the  encoiu-agement  of  the 
design  of  the  parties  for  whose  benefit  it  was 
granted,  viz.,  "the  discovery  of  a  new  passage 
into  the  South  Sea" — that  is  the  primary  object 
which  the  Crown  had  in  view ;  and  "  for  finding  of 
some  trade  in  furs,  minerals,  and  other  considerable 
commodities" — which  is  added  as  subordinate  in 
point  of  public  importance. 

The  Charter  in  the  first  instance  dictates  the  con- 
stitution of  the  Company,  and  creates  it  into  a 
regular  Corporation ;  and  as  to  this  part,  there 
exists  no  difierence  of  opinion.  The  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  is,  doubtless,  a  Chartered  Corporation,  as 
much  as  any  at  present  existing. 

The  question  is, — What  was  given  and  granted 
to  this  Corporation  after  it  had  been  created  ? 

Now  the  privileges  granted  are  of  three  distinct 
hinds. 

First.  The  privilege  of  exclusive  trade,  through- 
out certain  territories,  which  the  Charter  professes 
to  describe,  and  which  it  calls  "  Rupert's  Land." 


24  OF    THE    CHARTER. 

Secondly.  The  property  and  lordship  of  the  soil 
of  Rupert's  Land. 

Thirdly.  The  privilege  of  exclusive  trade  with  all 
countries  into  which  the  Company  might  find  access 
by  land  or  water  out  of  Rupert's  Land. 

These  three  grants  are  contained  in  the  following 
words  of  the  Charter : — 

1.  "We  do  give,  grant,  and  confirm,  unto  the  said 
Governor  and  Company,  and  their  successors,  the  sole 
trade  and  commerce  of  all  those  seas,  straits,  bays, 
rivers,  lakes,  creeks,  and  sounds,  in  whatsoever  latitude 
they  shall  be,  that  lie  within  the  entrance  of  the  straits 
commonly  called  Hudson's  Straits." 

2.  "  Together  with  all  the  lands  and  territories  upon 
the  countries,  coasts,  and  confines  of  the  seas,  bays, 
lakes,  rivers,  creeks,  and  sounds  aforesaid,  that  are  not 
already  actually  possessed  by  or  granted  to  any  of  our 
subjects,  or  possessed  by  the  subjects  of  any  other 
Christian  Prince  or  State,  with  the  fishing  of  all  sorts 
of  fish,  whales,  sturgeons,  and  all  other  royal  fishes  in 
the  seas,  bays,  inlets,  and  rivers  within  the  premises, 
and  the  fish  therein  taken,  together  with  the  royalty  of 
the  sea  upon  the  coasts  within  the  limits  aforesaid,  and 
all  mines  royal,  as  well  discovered  as  not  discovered,  of 
gold,  silver,  gems,  and  precious  stones,  to  be  found  or 
discovered  within  the  territories,  limits,  and  places 
aforesaid ;  and  that  the  said  land  be  from  henceforth 
reckoned  and  reputed  as  one  of  our  plantations  or  colo- 
nies in  America,  called  Rupert's  Land." 

3.  "  And  furthermore,  we  do  grant  unto  the  said 
Governor  and  Company,  and  their  successors,  that  they 
and  their  successors,  and  their  factors,  servants,  and 
agents,  for  them  and  on  their  behalf,  and  not  otherwise, 


GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND.  25 

shall  for  ever  hereafter  have,  use,  and  enjoy,  not  only 
the  whole,  entire,  and  only  trade  and  traffic,  and  the 
whole,  entire,  and  only  liberty,  use,  and  privilege  of 
trading  and  trafficking  to  and  from  the  territory,  limits, 
and  places  aforesaid ;  but  also  the  whole  and  entire  trade 
and  traffic  to  and  from  all  havens,  bays,  creeks,  rivers, 
lakes,  and  seas,  into  which  they  shall  find  entrance  or 
passage  by  water  or  land  out  of  the  territories,  limits, 
and  places  aforesaid ;  and  to  and  with  all  the  nations 
and  people  inhabiting  or  which  shall  inhabit  within  the 
territories,  limits,  and  places  aforesaid  ;  and  to  and  mth 
all  other  nations  inhabiting  any  of  the  coasts  adjacent 
to  the  said  territories,  limits,  and  places  which  are  not 
already  possessed  as  aforesaid,  or  whereof  the  sole  liberty 
or  privil^e  of  trade  or  traffic  is  not  yet  granted  to  any 
other  of  our  subjects." 

The  three  things  granted,  then,  are,  arranging 
them,  for  the  sake  of  convenience,  in  a  different 
order, — 

1.  The  territorial  lordship  of  Rupert's  Land. 

2.  The  exclusive  trade  of  Rupert's  Land. 

3.  The  exclusive  trade  with  all  other  parts  to 
which  access  might  be  obtained  thence  by  land  or 
water. 

The  first  question  is,  Where  is  Rupert's  Land  ? 
Had  those  who  framed  the  Company's  Charter  had 
the  benefit  of  the  maps  now  extant,  they  would,  no 
doubt,  have  made  use  of  such  language  that  we 
should  have  been  able  to  form  some  idea  ;  but  as 
the  matter  stands,  that  is  quite  impossible.     The 


26  GRANT    OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND. 

words  by  which  Rupert's  Land  is  described,  are — 
"All  those  seas,  straits,  bays,  &c.,  in  whatsoever 
latitude  they  shall  be,  that  lie  within  the  entrance 
of  the  straits  commonly  called  Hudson's  Straits, 
together  with  all  the  lands  and  territories  upon  the 
countries,  coasts,  and  confines  of  the  seas,  &c.,  afore- 
said, that  are  not  already  actually  possessed,  or 
granted  to  any  of  our  subjects,  or  possessed  by  the 
subjects  of  any  other  Christian  Prince  or  State." 

Now,  it  is  quite  impossible  to  say  what  are  the 
limits  of  the  country  which  the  Crown  intended,  by 
the  above  language,  to  include  in  the  colony  of 
Rupert's  Land. 

Indeed,  it  is  manifest  that  the  Crown  was  entirely 
ignorant  of  the  geography  of  the  country  which  it 
was  thus  granting  away ;  and  that,  in  the  want  of 
any  accurate  information  as  to  what  country  did 
exist  within  the  Hudson's  Straits,  it  betook  itself  to 
the  indefinite  language  above  quoted.  It  is  not 
here  disputed,  that  it  is  within  the  prerogative  of 
the  Crown  to  grant  away  the  waste  lands  of  its 
colonial  possessions,  without  the  intervention  of  Par- 
liament ;  the  right  to  do  so  is  exercised  up  to  the 
present  hour.  The  doubt  as  to  the  validity  of  the 
grant  in  question  does  not  arise  from  any  dispute 
as  to  the  power  of  the  Crown  to  make  such  a  grant, 


GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND.  27 

but  from  the  language  in  which  the  grant  is  made 
being  utterly  unintelligible.  AVho  can  say  what  is 
meant  by  the  words,  "  All  the  lands  and  territories 
upon  the  courUries,  coasts,  and  confines  of  the  seas,  ^c, 
that  lie  within  the  Hudson's  Straits  ?  " 

For  a  century  and  half  after  the  grant  was  made, 
the  Company  never  dreamt  of  asserting  its  privi- 
leges in  the  sense  in  which  it  has  been  attempted  for 
the  last  half  century  to  interpret  them.  The  claim 
now  made  is,  that  the  words  of  the  grant  include 
all  the  country  the  waters  of  which  fall  into  Hud- 
son's Bay ;  and  an  opinion  is  quoted,  which  was 
given  by  Romilly,  Holroyd,  Cruse,  Scarlett,  and 
Bell,  to  the  effect,  that  "  the  grant  of  the  soil  con- 
tained in  the  Charter  is  good,  and  that  it  will  in- 
clude all  the  countries  the  waters  of  which  flow 
into  Hudson's  Bay." 

Th^  value  of  counsel's  opinion  in  a  case  like  the 
present,  depends,  in  a  great  measure,  on  the  word- 
ing of  the  case  drawn.  Now,  the  case  drawn  is 
before  us ;  and,  it  may  be  remarked,  that  a  more 
singularly  cautious  opinion  was  never  given,  than 
that  of  the  illustrious  lawyers  above  mentioned. 
Certain  questions  were  proposed  to  them,  in  such 
language  as  to  avoid  many  of  the  disputed  points 
between  the  Company  and  their  opponents,  and  the 


28  GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND. 

counsel,  in  giving  their  opinion,  confine  themselves 
almost  entirely  to  the  words  of  the  case  drawn  for 
them.  And,  indeed,  whenever  their  language 
differs  from  that  of  the  case,  it  is,  singularly  enough, 
to  enforce  on  their  client,s  the  necessity  of  extreme 
caution  in  exercising  the  powers  which  they  claimed. 

With  respect,  however,  to  the  particular  part  of 
the  opinion  referred  to,  that  the  grant  to  the  Hud- 
son's Bay  Company  will  include  "  all  the  countries 
the  waters  of  which  flow  into  Hudson's  Bay,"  we 
have  given,  in  the  annexed  map,  an  outline,  as 
near  as  can  be  ascertained,  of  what  would  be  the 
extent  of  Rupert's  Land,  according  to  such  an  inter- 
pretation of  the  Charter. 

The  waters  from  the  centre  of  the  continent  of 
North  America  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains,  flow 
in  four  directions — into  the  Arctic  Ocean,  into 
Hudson's  Bay,  into  the  St.  Lawrence,  and  into  the 
Gulf  of  Mexico.  The  strong  line  in  the  accompany- 
ing map  is  drawn,  as  nearly  as  can  be  ascertained, 
along  the  high  lands  from  which  the  waters  descend, 
in  the  above  several  directions  ;  and  if  the  interpre- 
tation of  the  Charter  given  above  be  sound,  all  the 
land  within  the  strong  line  in  the  map  must  belong 
to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  as  sole  lords  and 
proprietors. 


GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND.  29 

This  is  the  claim  of  the  Company  mider  their 
Charter. 

This  is,  at  least,  the  ordinary  claim  ;  but  there  is 
an  ultramontane  doctrine  respecting  the  property 
of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  as  well  as  respecting 
the  infallibility  of  the  Pope. 

And  thus,  when  they  are  in  good  spirits,  we  find 
the  Company  make  a  much  larger  claim  than 
even  the  above — a  claim  at  which  Mr.  M.  Martin 
mysteriously  hints,  when  he  says,  "  This  opinion," 
speaking  of  the  opinion  of  the  counsel  above  referred 
to,  "  does  not  define  liow  much  more  territory  may 
be  included  in  right  of  the  Charter." 

Sir  J.  Pelly  says,  before  the  Committee  of  the 
House  of  Commons  to  inquire  into  the  Condition 
of  the  Aborigines,  "  The  power  of  the  Company 
extends  all  the  way  from  the  boundaries  of  Lower 
and  Upper  Canada,  away  to  the  North  Pole,  as 
far  as  the  land  goes,  and  from  the  Labrador  coast 
all  the  way  to  the  Pacific  Ocean." 

Another  account  of  the  claim  of  the  Company 
under  their  Charter  is  given  by  Mr.  Martin,  (p.  5,) 
where  he  says,  "  From  the  correspondence  of  the  7th 
September  and  30th  October,  1846,  laid  before 
Parliament  10th  August,  1848,  it  would  appear 
that  the  Crown  considered  the  Rocky  Mountains  as 


30  GRANT    OF   SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND. 

the  eastern  boundary  of  the  territory  over  which  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  have  exclusive  right  of 
trading  with  the  natives  for  twenty-one  years  from  the 
13th  May,  1838 ;"  that  is  to  say,  (since  the  grant  of 
exclusive  trade  comprises  all  "  the  Indian  terri- 
tories," i.  e.,  the  territories  without  the  British 
plantations  or  colonies,  of  which  Rupert's  Land  is 
one,)  the  Rocky  Mountains  are  the  western  boun- 
dary of  Rupert's  Land. 

Hence  it  is  manifest,  that  it  is  impossible  to  as- 
sign any  definite  limits  to  the  country  granted  to 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  under  their  Charter, 
without  recoiu-se  to  a  Court  of  Law,  or  to  an  Act  of 
Parliament. 

The  opinion  given  by  the  eminent  lawyers,  quoted 
above,  was  not  the  only  one  taken  at  the  time  when 
the  question  arose,  as  to  the  right  of  the  Company 
to  make  over  a  tract  of  land  of  16,000  square 
miles  to  Lord  Selkirk. 

The  North- West  Company  at  that  time  brought 
the  case  before  Sir  Arthur  Pigott,  Serjeant  Spankie, 
and  Lord  Brougham,  who  gave  a  most  elaborate 
opinion  on  the  whole  case. 

That  part  of  it  which  relates  to  the  grant  of  the 
soil,  is  as  follows  : — 

"  But  we  think  that  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  and 


GRANT    OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND.  31 

their  grantee,  Lord  Selkirk,  have  extended  their  ter- 
ritorial claims  much  further  than  the  Charter,  or  any 
sound  construction  of  it,  will  warrant.  Supposing  it 
free  from  all  the  objections  to  which  we  apprehend  it 
may,  in  other  respects,  be  liable,  the  words  of  grant, 
pursuing  the  recital  of  the  petition  of  the  grantees,  with 
a  very  trifling  variation,  and  with  none  that  can  affect 
the  construction  of  the  instrument,  are,  of  '  the  sole 
trade  and  commerce  of  all  those  seas,  straits,  bays, 
rivers,  lakes,  creeks,  and  sounds,  in  whatever  latitude 
they  shall  be,  that  lie  within  the  entrance  of  the  straits 
commonly  called  Hudson's  Straits,  together  with  the 
lands  and  territories  upon  the  countries,  coasts,  and 
confines  of  the  seas,  bays,  lakes,  rivers,  creeks,  and 
sounds  aforesaid,'  that  is,  within  the  Straits  ;  and  these 
limits  are  frequently  referred  to  in  the  subsequent  parts 
of  the  Charter,  and  always  referred  to  throughout  the 
Charter  as  the  '  limits  aforesaid.' 

''  There  is,  indeed,  an  extension  of  the  right  of  trade, 
and  His  Majesty  grants  that  the  Company  '  shall  for 
ever  hereafter  have,  use,  and  enjoy,  not  only  the  whole 
entire  and  only  liberty  of  trade  and  traffic,  and  the 
whole  entire  and  only  liberty,  use,  and  privilege  of 
trading  and  traffic  to  and  from  the  territories,  limits, 
and  places  aforesaid,  but  also  the  whole  and  entire 
trade  and  traffic  to  and  from  all  havens,  bays,  creeks, 
rivers,  lakes,  and  seas,  into  which  they  may  find 
entrance  or  passage  by  water  or  land,  out  of  the  terri- 
tories, limits,  and  places  aforesaid,  and  to  and  with  all 
the  natives  and  people,  inhabitants,  or  which  shall  in- 
habit within  the  territories,  limits,  and  places  aforesaid, 
and  to  and  with  all  other  nations  inhabiting  any  of  the 
coasts  adjacent  to  the  said  territories,  limits,  and 
places  aforesaid,  which  are  not  already  possessed  as 
aforesaid.' 

"  It  is  plain,  therefore,  that  the  territorial  grant  was 


32  GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND. 

not  intended  to  comprehend  all  the  lands  and  terri- 
tories that  might  be  approached  through  Hudson's 
Straits,  by  land  or  water.  The  territorial  grant  then 
appears  to  be  limited  by  the  relation  and  proximity  of 
the  territories  to  Hudson's  Straits,  The  general  de- 
scription applying  to  the  whole,  is  the  seas,  &c.  that  lie 
within  Hudson's  Straits,  and  the  land,  &c.,  upon  the 
countries,  coasts,  and  confines  of  the  seas,  &c.,  that  is, 
reddendo  singula  singulis,  the  lands  upon  the  countries, 
coasts,  and  confines  of  each  of  the  seas,  rivers,  &c.,  naturally 
including  such  a  portion  of  territory  as  might  be  reasonably 
necessary  for  the  objects  in  view  ;  but  it  is  not  a  grant  of 
all  the  lands  and  territories  in  which  the  seas,  rivers,  &c., 
lie  or  are  situated,  or  which  surround  them  to  any  indefi- 
nite extent  or  distance  from  them.  Still  less  is  it  a  grant 
of  all  the  lands  and  territories  lying  between  the  seas, 
straits,  rivers,  &c.,  though  many  hundred  or  thousand 
mUes  or  leagues  of  lands  and  territories  migfht  lie  be- 
tween  one  sea,  strait,  river,  lake,  &c.,  and  another  sea, 
strait,  river,  lake,  &c.,  and  though  the  quantity  of  land 
comprised  in  this  interior  situation,  and  far  distant  from 
any  coast  or  confine  of  the  specified  waters,  might  exceed 
in  dimensions  the  extent  of  many  existing  powerful 
kingdoms  or  states.  Within  the  Straits,  must  mean  such 
a  proximity  to  the  Straits  as  would  give  the  lands  spoken 
of  a  sort  of  aftinity  or  relation  to  Hudson's  Straits,  and 
not  such  lands  as  from  their  immense  distance,  (in  this 
case  the  nearest  point  to  Hudson's  Bay  being  700  miles, 
and  from  thence  extending  to  a  distance  of  1 ,500  miles 
from  it,)  have  no  such  geographical  affinity  or  relation 
to  the  Straits,  but  which  are  not  even  approached  by 
the  Canadians  through  or  by  the  Straits  in  question. 
The  whole  grant  contemplates  the  Straits  as  the  access 
to  the  lands  and  territories  therein  referred  to ;  and  as 
there  is  no  boundary  specified,  except  by  the  description 
of  the  coasts  and  confines  of  the  places  mentioned,  that 


[ 


GRANT    OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND.  33 

is,  the  coasts  and  confines  of  the  seas,  &c.  within  the 
Straits,  such  a  boundary  must  be  implied  as  is  consistent 
with  that  view,  and  with  the  professed  objects  of  a 
trading  Company  intending,  not  to  found  kingdoms  and 
establisli  states,  but  to  carry  on  fisheries  in  those  waters, 
and  to  trade  and  traffic  for  the  acquisition  of  skins  and 
peltries,  and  the  other  articles  mentioned  in  the  Charter  ; 
and  in  such  a  long  tract  of  time  as  nearly  150  years  now 
elapsed  since  the  grant  of  the  Charter,  it  must  now  be, 
and  must,  indeed,  long  since  have  been,  fully  ascertained 
by  the  actual  occupation  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
what  portion  or  portions  of  lands  and  territories  in  the 
^^cinity,  and  on  the  coasts  and  confines  of  the  waters 
mentioned  and  described  as  within  the  Straits,  they  have 
found  necessary  for  their  purposes,  and  for  forts,  fac- 
tories, towns,  villages,  settlements,  or  such  other  esta- 
blishments in  such  vicinity,  and  on  such  coasts  and  con- 
fines as  pertain  and  belong  to  a  Company  instituted  for 
the  purposes  mentioned  in  their  Charter,  and  necessary, 
useful,  or  convenient  to  them  within  the  prescribed 
limits  for  the  prosecution  of  those  purposes.  The  enor- 
mous extensions  of  land  and  territory  now  claimed, 
appears,  therefore,  to  us,  not  to  be  warranted  by  any 
sound  construction  of  the  Charter  ;  and  if  it  could  be 
so,  we  do  not  know  where  the  land  and  territory  of  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company,  granted  by  this  Charter  ter- 
minates, nor  what  are  the  parts  of  that  vast  continent  on 
which  they  have  taken  upon  them  to  g^ant  116,000 
miles  of  territory,  exempted  from  their  proprietorship 
under  their  Charter. 

"  Indeed,  there  may  be  sufficient  reason  to  suppose 
that  the  territories  in  question,  or  part  of  them,  had 
been  then  visited,  traded  in,  and  in  a  certain  degree 
occupied  by  the  French  settlers  or  traders  in  Canada, 
and  their  Beaver  Company  erected  in  1630,  whose  trade 
in  peltries  was  considerably  prior  to  the  date  of  the 


34  GRANT   OF   SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND. 

Charter.  These  territories,  therefore,  would  be  ex- 
pressly excepted  out  of  the  grant ;  and  the  right  of 
British  subjects  in  general  to  visit  and  trade  in  these 
regions,  would  follow  the  national  rights  acquired  by 
the  King,  by  the  conquest  and  cession  of  Canada,  and 
as  enjoyed  by  the  French  Canadians  previous  to  that 
conquest  and  cession. 

"  No  territorial  right,  therefore,  can  be  claimed  in  the 
districts  in  question ;  and  the  exclusive  trade  there  cannot 
be  set  on  the  virtue  of  the  Charter,  these  districts  being 
remote  from  any  geographical  relation  to  Hudson's  Bay, 
and  to  the  Straits ;  and  not  being  in  any  sense  tviihin 
the  Straits,  and  not  being  approached  by  the  Canadian 
traders,  or  other  alleged  interlopers,  through  the  inter- 
dicted regions,  of  course,  no  violence  to,  or  interruption 
of,  trade,  could  be  justified  there,  under  these  territorial 
claims." 

Such  is  the  present  state  of  the  legal  opinions  as 
to  the  validity  of  the  claims  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company.  The  opinion  just  quoted  is  entitled  to 
respect,  not  only  from  the  distinguished  names  at- 
tached to  it,  but  because  it  is  given  by  men  who 
had  evidently  carefully  considered  the  whole  ques- 
tion :  their  conviction  was,  that  the  Red  River  could 
in  no  sense  be  included  in  Rupert's  Land  ;  and  that 
such  an  exaggerated  interpretation  of  the  language 
of  the  Charter  was  manifestly  not  contemplated  by 
the  grant  itself. 

At  any  rate,  quite  sufficient  has 'been  said  to 
shew  that  the  question  must  be  referred  to  a  Court 


GRANT    OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND.  35 

of  Law,  in  order  that  the  property  of  the  Company, 
if  any  exist  at  all,  be  clearly  defined. 

But  the  obscurity  of  the  wording  of  this  Charter  is 
not  the  only  objection  that  may  be  taken  to  it.  The 
history  of  the  times,  the  nature  of  the  grant,  and  the 
conduct  of  the  Company  themselves,  all  supply  many 
reasons  for  believing  that  the  grant  of  these  privileges 
and  property  to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  is  invalid 
from  beginning  to  end :  and  that  nothing  more  is 
wanting  than  a  trial  at  law,  or  an  investigation  of 
Parliament,  to  blow  it  entirely  away. 

In  the  first  place,  looking  at  the  history  of  the 
times,  tliere  is  strong  reason  to  doubt  whether, 
when  King  Charles  II.  signed  this  Charter,  the 
country  which  afforded  the  materials  for  His 
Majesty's  generosity  to  display  itself,  without  injury 
to  his  exhausted  Exchequer,  belonged  to  the  Crown 
of  England  at  all. 

The  question  as  to  the  rights  of  England  and 
France  respectively  to  the  territory  of  the  Hud- 
son's Bay  was  in  dispute  for  many  years  before, 
and  was  never  decided  until  many  years  after  1670, 
the  date  of  the  Charter :  it  was  never  finally  settled 
until  the  Treaty  of  Utrecht,  1713. 

The  mere  laying  claim  to  a  country  does  not 
prove  a  title  to  it,  otherwise  the  title  of  the  French 

d2 


36  GRANT    OF   SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND. 

would  be  clear ;  for  that  power  asserted  her  right 
to  the  whole  coast  of  North  America  as  far  as  the  pole. 

It  is  important  to  recollect,  that  the  fact  of 
comitries  having  come  into  the  possession  of  Eng- 
land in  specific  modes,  and  at  stated  periods,  such 
as  by  war,  treaty,  or  otherwise,  in  no  way  proves  the 
validity  of  the  claim,  before  such  settlement :  what  we 
assert  is,  that  at  the  date  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company's  Charter,  and  for  many  years  afterwards, 
the  territories  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  belonged  to 
France,  or  at  any  rate,  most  unquestionably,  quite 
as  much  to  France  as  to  England. 

Charles  II.  himself  seems  to  have  been  in  doubt 
as  to  what  did  or  did  not  belong  to  him,  because  he 
excludes  from  the  grant  made  to  the  Company, 
"  all  the  lands,  territories,  ^c,  at  that  time  possessed 
hy  any  other  Christian  Prince  or  Stated 

There  is  no  doubt  that  France  laid  claim  to  the 
Hudson's  Bay  territories.  As  early  as  the  year 
1598,  letters  patent  were  granted  by  Henry  IV.  of 
France,  to  Sieur  de  la  Roche,  appointing  him 
Lieutenant-Governor  over  the  coimtries  of  "  Canada, 
Hochelaga,  Terresneuves,  Labrador,  [a  part  of  the 
territories  claimed  by  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,] 
and  the  river  of  the  great  bay  of  Norrembegue,"  &c.* 

*  Edits,  &c,,  vol.  n.,  p.  5,  see  note  p.  38. 


GRANT    OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND.  37 

There  are  numerous  documents  of  a  similar 
kind,  proving  that  the  French  Crown  laid  claim  to 
these  territories ;  but,  passing  over  others,  we  may 
mention  that,  in  the  year  1627,  a  Company  was 
established,  entitled  "  La  Compagnie  de  la  Nouvelle 
France,"  to  which  a  Charter  was  granted,  entitled 
"  Acte  pour  I'etablissement  de  la  Compagnie  des 
cent  Associes  pour  le  commerce  du  Canada,  Con- 
tenant  les  articles  accordes  a  la  dite  Compagnie,  par 
M.  le  Cardinal  de  Richelieu,  le  29  Avril,  1627." 

The  4th  and  7th  Articles  of  this  Charter  are 
in  the  following  terms: — 

"  IV.  Et  pour  aucunement  rt?ecompenser  la  dite  Com- 
pagnie des  grands  frais  et  avances  qu'il  lui  conviendra 
faire  pour  parvenir  k  la  dite  peuplade,  entretien  et  con- 
servation d'icelle  Sa  Majeste  donnera  k  perpetuitt?  aux 
dits  cent  associes,  leurs  hoirs  et  ayans  cause,  en  toute 
propriete,  justice  et  seigneurie,  le  fort  et  habitation  de 
Quebec,  avec  tout  le  dit  pays  de  la  Nouvelle  France, 
dite  Canada,  tant  le  long  des  cutes  depuis  la  Floride, 
que  les  predecesseurs  Roisde  Sa  Majeste  ont  fait  habiter, 
en  rangeant  les  cutes  de  la  mer  jusqu'  au  cercle  Arctique 
pour  latitude  et  de  longitude  depuis  I'lsle  de  'I  erre- 
neuve  tirant  a  I'ouest,  jusqu'  au  grand  lac,  dit  la  mer 
douce,  et  au  dela,  que  dedans  les  terres  et  de  long  des 
rivieres  qui  y  passent,  et  se  dechargent  dans  le  fleuve 
appelle  Saint  Laurent,  autrement  la  grande  rivierre  de 
Canada,  et  dans  tous  les  autres  fleuves  qui  les  portent  a 
la  mer,  terres,  mines,  minieres,  pour  jouir  toutefois 
des  dites  mines  conformement  k  I'ordonnance,  ports 
et    havres,    fleuves,   rivieres,    etangs,    isles,    islots   et 

27650? 


38  GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND. 

generalement  toute  I'etendue  du  dit  pays  au  long  et  an 
large  et  par  de  la,  tant  et  si  avant  quil  pourront  etendre 
et  faire  connoitre  le  nom  de  Sa  Majeste,  ne  se  reservant 
Sa  dite  Majeste,  qui  le  ressort  de  la  foi  et  hommage  qui 
lui  sera  portee,  et  a  ses  sucesseurs  Rois  par  lest  dits  associtis 
on  I'un  d'eux,  avec  une  couronne  d'or  du  poids  de  huit 
marcs  a  chaque  mutation  de  Eois,  et  la  provision  des 
officiers  de  la  justice  souveraine  qui  lui  seront  nommes 
et  presentes  par  les  dits  associes  lorsqu'il  sera  juge  a 
a  propos  d'y  en  etablir  :  permettant  aux  dits  associes 
faire  fondre  canons,  boulets,  forger  toutes  sortes  d'armes 
offensives  et  defensives  faire  poudre  a  canon,  batir  et  for- 
tifier places  et  faire  gt^neralement  es  dits  lieux  toutes 
choses  necessaires,  soit  pour  la  surete  du  dit  pays,  soit 
pour  la  conservation  du  commerce. 

"  VII.  Davantage  Sa  Majeste  accordera  aux  dits 
associes,  pour  toujours,  le  trafic  de  tous  cuirs,  peaux  et 
pelleterie,  de  la  dite  Nouvelle  France ;  et  pour  quinze 
annees  seulement  a  commencer  au  premier  jour  de 
Janvier  de  I'annee  1628,  et  finissant  au  dernier  Decem- 
bre  que  Ton  comptera  1643,  tout  autre  commerce  soit 
terrestre  ou  naval,  qui  se  pourra  faire,  tirer,  traiter  et 
trafiquer,  en  quelque  sorte  et  maniere  que  ce  soit  en 
I'titendue  du  dit  pays,  et  autaut  quil  se  pourra  etendre ; 
a  la  reserve  de  la  peche  des  morues  et  baleines  seulement 
que  Sa  Majeste  veut  etre  libre  a  tous  ses  sujets,"  «&;c.* 

Part  of  the  country  granted  by  this  Charter  of 
Louis  XIII.  is  ^Ha  Nouvelle  France."  L'Escarbot 
thus  describes  the  boundaries  of  the  country  which 
was  understood  by  that  term: — 

*Edits,  Ordonnances  Royaux,  &c.  concernant  le  Canada,  publics 
par  ordie  de  Son  Excellence  Sir  Robert  Shore  Milnes,  Bart., 
Lieutenant-Governor  of  Lower  Canada,  en  consequence  de  deux 
Addresses  de  I'Assemblee,  5  and  7  March,  1801.    Vol.  i.,  pp.  3,4. 


GRANT   OF    SOIL   OP    RUPERT's    LAND.  39 

"  Ainsi  notre  Nouvelle  France  a  pour  limites  du  cote 
d'ouest  les  terres  jusqu'  a  la  mer  dite  Pacifique,  au  de9a 
du  Tropique  de  Cancer ;  au  midi  les  iles  de  la  Mer 
Atlantique  du  c6te  de  Cube,  et  I'isle  Hespagnole ;  au 
Levant,  la  Mer  du  Nord  qui  baignc  la  Nouvelle  France ; 
et  au  septentrion  cette  terre  qui  est  dite  in  connue  vers 
la  mer  glacee  jusqu'  au  Pole  Arctique  :"* 

— almost  the  same  words  as  those  used  by  Sir  J.  H. 
Felly,  quoted  before  (p.  29). 

This  was  the  country  which  the  French  under- 
stood by  the  term  "  la  Nouvelle  France"  at  that 
time  ;  and  by  the  Treaty  of  St.  Germains-en  Laye, 
in  March  1632,  Charles  I.  of  England  resigned  to 
Louis  XIII.  of  France  the  sovereignty  of  Acadia, 
New  France,  and  Canada,  generally  and  without 
limits,  and  particularly  Port  Royal,  Quebec,  and 
Cape  Breton.t 

Charlevoix  says,  in  his  History  of  New  France,  t  in 
arguing  the  pretensions  of  the  English  to  Hudson's 
Bay— 

"  II  est  certain  que  les  Anglois  ne  possedoient  rien 
aux  environs  de  cette  Baye,  lorsqu'  en  1656,  le  Sieur 
Bourdon  y  fut  envoie  pour  en  assurer  la  possession  a  la 
France :  ceremonie  qui  fut  plusieurs  fois  renouvellee 
dans  la  suite. 

"  II  est  vraie  qu'en  1663,  deux  transfuges  Francois, 
nommes  Groseilliers  et  de  Radisson,  pour  se  vengerdeje 
ne  s^ai  quel  me  contentment,  qu'on  leur  avail  donne, 

*  Bouchette,  note  p.  3.  f  Id.,  p.  4. 

X  Vol.  i.,  pp.  476,  477. 


40  GRANT   OF   SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND. 

conduisirent  des  Anglois  dans  la  Eiviere  de  Nemiscau, 
qui  se  d6charge  dans  le  fond  de  la  Baye,  et  qui  ceux-ci 
batirent  a  I'embouchure  de  cette  rivierre,  un  fort,  qui 
fut  nomme  Rupert :  que'dans  la  suite  ils  en  construisirent 
un  second  chez  les  Monsonis,  et  puis  un  troisieme  a 
Quitchitchouen  ;  mais  on  regarda  en  France,  et  en 
Canada  ces  enterprises  comme  des  usurpations." 

There  is  no  question  then  as  to  the  claim  of 
France  to  the  country  in  question,  and  we  shall  pre- 
sently see  that  their  claim  was  admitted  by  England 
at  a  subsequent  period. 

Not  only  was  it  claimed,  however,  but  it  appears 
to  have  been  actually  occupied  by  the  French. 
The  French  Fur  Company  of  Quebec,  established 
forty  years  before  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
appear  to  have  traversed  the  whole  of  the  country 
which  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  now  claim,  and 
yet  from  which  they  are  especially  excluded  under 
their  own  Charter.  For  many  years,  when  the 
English  Company  never  ventured  to  leave  the  shores 
of  the  Bay,  when  the  whole  of  their  establishments 
consisted  of  four  or  five  insignificant  forts  on  its 
shores,  the  voyageurs  of  the  French  Company  were 
traversing  the  whole  of  the  country  north-west  of  the 
Canadas,  as  far,  it  is  said,  as  the  Saskatchewan  river. 

That  the  question,  as  to  which  Crown  had  a  right 
to  Hudson's  Bay,  was  not  settled  at  that  time,  is 
clearly  proved  by  the  Treaty  of  Ryswick,  by  which 


GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND.         41 

it  was  provided  that  Commissioners  should  be  ap- 
pointed on  both  sides  "  to  examine  and  determine 
the  rights  and  pretensions,  which  either  of  the  said 
Kings  hath  to  the  places  situated  on  Hudson's 
Bay."  Up  to  this  date,  then,  it  was  still  uncer- 
tain whether  the  country  now  called  Rupert's  Land 
belonged  to  France  or  England. 

It  is  quite  obvious  that  no  grant  of  territory  can 
be  valid,  if  the  land  in  question  were  not  the  property 
of  the  donor  at  the  time  of  making  the  gift.  There 
are,  then,  at  first,  two  valid  objections  to  the  rights 
of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  on  these  two  grounds : 
— First,  that  the  country  in  question  did  not  belong 
to  the  Crown  of  England,  and,  therefore,  could  not 
be  legally  made  the  subject  of  a  grant ; — secondly, 
that  it  was,  for  the  most  part,  prior  to  the  date  of 
the  Charter,  possessed  by  the  subjects  of  another 
Christian  Prince^  and,  therefore,  is  especially  ex- 
cluded from  the  limits  of  the  grant,  by  the  words 
of  the  Charter  itself. 

But  however  this  may  have  been  the  case,  the 
Treaty  of  Ryswick,  signed  in  September  1697,  made 
over  to  France  a  very  large  part,  if  not  the  whole, 
of  the  territory  now  claimed  by  this  obsolete 
Charter  ;  and,  therefore,  the  rights  of  the  Company, 
supposing  them  to  have  been  valid  before,   were 


42  GRANT    OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND. 

effectually  extinguished,   since    no   reservation  in 
their  favour  was  made  by  the  treaty. 

Charlevoix  says,  "  Pour  ce  qui  est  de  la  Baye  d' 
Hudson,  elle  nons  resta  toute  entiere  parceque  nous 
en  etions  les  possesseursactuels.^^*  ■  And  Mr,  Bancroft, 
in  his  History  of  the  United  States,  tlius  records  the 
result  of  this  treaty : — 

"  In  America,  France  retained  all  Hudson's  Bay,  and 
all  the  places  of  which  she  was  in  possession  at  the 
beginning  of  the  war ;  in  other  words,  with  the  excep- 
tion of  the  eastern  moiety  of  Newfoundland,  France 
retained  the  whole  coast  and  adjacent  islands  from 
Maine  to  beyond  Labrador  and  Hudson's  Bay,  besides 
Canada  and  the  valley  of  the  Mississippi.''^ 

The    clauses  of  the  Treaty  of  Ryswick  which 

refer  to  the  disputed  territories  in  Hudson's  Bay, 

are  as  follows : — 

"VII.  The  Most  Christian  King  shall  restore  to  the 
said  King  of  Great  Britain,  all  countries,  islands,  forts, 
and  colonies,  wheresoever  situated,  which  the  English 
did  possess  before  the  declaration  of  this  present  war  ; 
and  in  like  manner,  the  King  of  Great  Britain  shall 
restore  to  the  Most  Christain  King  all  countries,  islands, 
forts,  and  colonies,  wheresoever  situated,  which  the 
French  did  possess  before  the  said  declaration  of  war  ; 
and  this  restitution  shall  be  made  on  both  sides  within 
the  space  of  six  months,  or  sooner,  if  it  can  be  done : 
and  to  that  end,  immediately  after  the  ratification  of 
this  treaty,  each  of  the  said  Kings  shall  deliver,  or  cause 
to  be  delivered  to  the  other,  or  to  Commissioners  au- 

*  Charlevoix,  vol.  ii.,  p.  236.  t  "^'ol-  "•>  P-  1^2. 


GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND.         43 

thorised  in  his  name  for  that  purpose,  all  acts  of  conces- 
sion, instruments,  and  necessary  orders,  duly  made  and 
in  proper  form,  so  that  they  may  have  their  effect. 

"  VIII.  Commissioners  shall  be  appointed  on  both 
eides  to  examine  and  determine  the  rights  and  preten- 
sions which  either  of  the  said  Kings  hath  to  the  places 
situated  in  Hudson's  Bay.  But  the  possession  of  those 
places  which  were  taken  by  the  French  during  the  peace 
that  preceded  this  present  war,  and  were  retaken  by  the 
English  during  this  war,  shall  be  left  to  the  French  by 
virtue  of  the  foregoing  Article.  The  capitulation  made 
by  the  English  on  the  5th  September,  1696,  shall  be 
observed  according  to  its  form  and  tenor ;  merchandises 
therein  mentioned  shall  be  restored  ;  the  Governor  of 
the  fort  there  shall  be  set  at  liberty,  if  it  be  not  already 
done.  The  differences  arisen  concerning  the  execution 
of  the  said  capitulation,  and  the  value  of  the  goods  there 
lost,  shall  be  adjudged  and  determined  by  the  said 
Commissioners,  who  immediately  after  the  ratification 
of  the  present  treaty,  shall  be  invested  with  sufficient 
authority  for  settling  the  limits  and  confines  of  the 
lands  to  be  restored,  on  either  side,  by  virtue  of  the 
foregoing  Article,  and  likewise  for  exchanging  of  lands 
as  may  conduce  to  the  mutual  interest  and  advantage 
of  both  Kings.  And  to  this  end  the  Commissioners  so 
appointed  shall,  within  the  space  of  three  months  from 
the  time  of  the  ratification  of  the  present  treaty,  meet 
in  the  City  of  London ;  and  ^vithin  six  months,  to  be 
reckoned  from  their  first  meeting,  shall  determine  all 
differences  and  disputes  which  may  arise  concerning 
this  matter :  after  which,  the  Articles  the  said  Com- 
missioners shall  agree  to,  shall  be  ratified  by  both  Kings, 
and  shall  have  the  same  force  and  vigour  as  if  they  were 
inserted  word  for  word  in  the  present  treaty."* 

*  A  General  Collection  of  Treatises,  in  4  vols.  8vo.  London. 
1710.    Vol.  L,  p.  304. 


44  GRANT    OF    SOIL    OF    RUPERt's    LAND. 

Hence  we  see,  that  Commissioners  are  to  be 
appointed  to  examine  and  determine  the  rights  and 
pretensions  which  either  of  the  said  Kings  hath  to 
the  places  situated  on  Hudson's  Bay,  except  those 
parts  which  were  taken  by  the  French  during  the 
peace  which  preceded  the  war;  which  parts  are  to 
belong  to  France.  It  is  not  possible  to  conceive  a 
more  distinct  acknowledgment  than  is  here  made, 
of  the  right  which  the  French  had  to,  at  least,  half 
the  coasts  of  the  Bay.  In  a  time  of  profound  peace 
between  the  two  countries,  an  expedition  is  sent 
from  Canada,  commanded  by  Chevalier  de  Troyes. 
He  takes  the  forts  which  were  established  by  the 
English,  and  drives  away  their  possessors ;  and  he 
does  so  upon  the  plea  that  the  country  occupied  by 
these  forts  was  part  of  the  dominions  of  his  Sove- 
reign. The  forts  were  those  built  by  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company,  and  were  situated  on  James'  Bay 
and  Hudson's  Bay  ;  and  at  the  conclusion  of  the 
war,  it  is  declared,  by  an  express  article  in  the 
Treaty  of  Peace  between  France  and  England, 
that  the  country  so  captured,  although  retaken, 
shall  be  restored  to  the  dominions  of  the  French 
King.  It  is  not  possible  to  conceive  a  more  distinct 
and  national  acknowledgment  that  those  countries  did 
not  belong  to  the  Croum  of  England  at  the  time  they 


GRANT    OF    SOIL    OF    RUPERT's    LAND.         45 

were  taken  in  the  peace  preceding  the  war ;  nor, 
a  fortiori,  at  an  earlier  period  ;  and  thus  it  would 
seem  to  be  manifest,  that  at  least  half  the  claim 
which  the  Company  now  make,  is  for  a  tract  of 
country  which  is  especially  exempted  from  their 
Charter,  as  being  at  that  period  "  possessed  by  the 
subjects  of  another  Christian  Prince,"  But,  besides 
this,  supposing  for  a  moment  that  the  whole  of  what  is 
now  called  Rupert's  Land,  had  been,  in  1670,  within 
the  dominions  of  Great  Britain ;  that  is  to  say,  that 
the  title  of  the  French  thereto,  which  England  ac- 
knowledged by  the  peace  of  Ryswick,  had  been 
acquired  by  France  subsequently  to  1670,  and  be- 
fore 1686,  when  the  country  was  taken  by  De  Troyes, 
all  which  is  historically  untrue  ;  yet,  supposing  for  a 
moment  such  to  be  the  case,  and  that  the  country 
now  claimed  as  Rupert's  Land  were,  at  the  time 
of  the  Charter,  really  within  the  dominions  of  the 
British  Crown,  it  is  perfectly  manifest  that  the  claim 
of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  was  effectually  an- 
nihilated by  the  Treaty  of  Ryswick,  because  that 
country  was  then]^made  over  to  France,  and  no  kind 
of  stipulation  was  added  that  the  rights  of  that 
Company  should  be  respected. 

Had  the  rights  of  the  Company  been  valid,  there 
would  have  been  a  clear  title  to  compensation,  when 


46  GRANT    OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND. 

all  their  territories  were  made  over  to  France. 
Certainly  no  one  then  heard  of  any  claim,  on  the 
part  of  the  Company,  for  compensation  for  the  loss 
they  would  have  sustained,  had  the  boundaries 
between  France  and  England  remained  according  to 
the  adjustment  of  that  treaty :  and  yet,  had  such  been 
the  case,  the  claims  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
would  not  have  been  heard  of  from  that  day  to  this. 
The  country  granted  by  Charles  II.  to  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  was  definitely  and  unreservedly  made 
over  to  France.  The  Commissioners  appointed  by 
this  treaty  do  not  appear  ever  to  have  met :  but,  if 
they  had,  there  could  have  been  no  change  in  the 
argument  in  favour  of  the  Company,  as  the  Com- 
missioners are  expressly  debarred  from  assigning  to 
England  the  territory  which  had  been  taken  by  the 
French  during  the  peace  preceding  the  war,  to 
which  our  argument  relates ;  although  it  is  quite 
possible,  that,  had  they  met,  they  might  have 
strengthened  the  argument  in  no  small  degree,  by 
having  assigned  to  France  a  still  larger  portion  of 
the  territory  in  question  than  the  treaty  itself  most 
indisputably  awarded  her. 

During  the  time  which  elapsed  between  the  Treaty 
of  Ryswick  in  1696,  and  the  Treaty  of  Utrecht 
in  1714,  almost  the  whole   of  the  Hudson's  Bay 


GRANT  OF  SOIL  OF  RUPERt's  LAND.    47 

territories  remained  in  possession  of  the  French. 
ITie  Hudson's  Bay  Company  do  not  appear  to  have 
had  a  single  fort  in  the  whole  country,  except 
Albany. 

But  by  the  Treaty  of  Utrecht  the  whole  of 
Hudson's  Bay  was  made  over  to  England.  England 
then  possessed  it  for  the  first  time,  and  it  has  con- 
tinued in  their  possession  ever  since. 

The  articles  in  this  treaty  which  refer  to  Hud- 
son's Bay  are  as  follows : — 

"  The  said  Most  Christian  King  shall  restore  to  the 
Kingdom  and  Queen  of  Great  Britain,  to  be  possessed 
in  full  right  for  ever,  the  Bay  and  Straits  of  Hudson, 
together  with  all  lands,  seas,  sea-coasts,  rivers  and 
places  situate  in  the  said  Bay  and  Straits,  and  which 
belong  thereunto,  no  tracts  of  land  or  of  sea  being  ex- 
cepted which  are  at  present  possessed  hy  the  subjects  of 
France.  All  which,  as  well  as  any  buildings  there 
made,  in  the  condition  they  now  are,  and  likewise  all 
fortresses  there  erected,  either  before  or  since  the 
French  seized  the  same,  shall  within  six  months  from 
the  ratification  of  the  present  treaty,  or  sooner  if  pos- 
sible, be  well  and  truly  delivered  to  the  British 
subjects,  having  commission  from  the  Queen  of  Great 
Britain  to  demand  and  receive  the  same,  entire  and  un- 
demolished,  together  with  all  the  cannon  and  cannon 
ball  which  are  therein,  as  also  with  a  qusintity  of  pow- 
der if  it  be  there  found,  in  proportion  to  the  cannon 
ball,  and  with  the  other  provision  of  war  usually  belong- 
ing to  cannon.  It  is,  however,  provided,  that  it  may  be 
entirely  free  for  the  Company  of  Quebec^  and  all  other 
the  subjects  of  the  Most  Christian  King  whatsoever,  to 


48  GRANT    OF   SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND. 

go  by  land  or  by  sea,  whithersoever  they  please,  out  of 
the  lands  of  the  said  Bay,  together  with  all  their  goods, 
merchandizes,  arms,  and  effects,  of  what  nature  or  con- 
dition soever,  except  such  things  as  are  above  reserved 
in  this  Article,"  &c.* 

From  this  Article  it  plainly  appears  that  what  we 
have  asserted  before  is  true,  viz.,  that  a  considerable 
part  of  Hudson's  Bay  was  still  in  possession  of  the 
French — and  especially  the  French  Fur  Company 
of  Quebec. 

We  have  shown  then  that  the  territories  now 
claimed  by  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  were  pos- 
sessed by  the  French  before  the  date  of  the  Charter, 
were  made  over  to  France  formally,  and  with  the 
strongest  acknowledgment  of  her  previous  right  to 
possess  them,  within  thirty  years  after  that  date  ; 
and  remained,  to  a  great  extent,  in  the  possession 
of  the  French  until  the  Peace  of  Utrecht,  which 
finally  gave  the  whole  of  Hudson's  Bay  to  England. 
England  then,  for  the  first  time,  acquired  an  un- 
doubted title  to  the  coimtry  by  right  of  treaty. 

But  the  rights  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
have  been  brought  into  collision  not  with  those  of 
France  only,  but  with  those  of  the  United  States  of 
America. 

*  A  General  Collection  of  Treatises,  in  4  vols.  8vo.  London. 
1723.    VoLiii,p.431. 


GRANT    OF    SOIL    OF    RUPERT's    LAND.  49 

It  will  be  seen,  by  looking  at  the  map,  that 
the  waters  of  the  Red  River  flow  into  Lake  Winni- 
peg, and  thence  into  Hudson's  Bay.  Upon  the 
opinion  quoted  above,  that  the  property  of  the  Com- 
pany includes  all  the  countries  the  waters  of  which 
fall  into  Hudson's  Bay,  the  whole  territory,  up  to 
the  source  of  the  Red  River,  must  belong  to  the 
Company.  This  tract  of  country,  moreover,  was  of 
very  great  value  to  the  Company  :  it  was  the  most 
valuable  bit  of  land  in  their  whole  dominions,  be- 
cause it  was  the  farthest  south,  and  in  a  milder 
climate  than  the  rest ;  and,  if  the  description  which 
Mr.  Martin  gives  of  the  general  character  of  the 
Company's  territories  be  not  grossly  exaggerated — 
(a  good  deal  of  exaggeration  is  admissible  in  a 
party  book,) — if  those  countries  be  such  that  they 
"  could  not  be  maintained  but  for  the  possession 
of  some  more  temperate  regions  from  whence  food 
is  procm^able,"  *  then  the  slip  of  land  about  the 
sources  of  the  Red  River  must  be  the  most  valuable 
part  of  the  Company's  property. 

But  this  bit  is  in  the  territories  of  the  United  States. 

How  did  it  get  there?     When  the  boundary  was 

settled  in  1818,  the  Crown  deliberately  made  over 

to  a  foreign  power  a  part  of  its  dominions  which  it 

•  P.  11. 

£ 


50  GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND. 

had  granted  to  its  own  subjects  one  hundred  and  fifty 
years  before.  More  than  this,  this  tract  of  which 
we  are  speaking  was  included  in  the  grant  of  land 
made  by  the  Company  to  Lord  Selkirk :  yet,  the 
boundary,  when  it  was  settled,  was  driven  through 
Lord  Selkirk's  land,  slicing  off  a  large  part,  and 
making  it  over  to  the  United  States.  The  Govern- 
ment, moreover,  were  not  in  ignorance  that  this  part 
of  the  territory  made  over  to  the  United  States 
was  within  the  limits  of  the  country  claimed 
by  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  under  their 
Charter,  and  granted  to  Lord  Selkirk  ;  because  Mr. 
M'Gillivray,  writing  to  the  Colonial  Minister  in  the 
year  1815,  respecting  Lord  Selkirk's  colony,  says, — 

"  The  settlers,  by  proceeding  up  beyond  the  Forks  of 
the  Red  River,  have  got  to  the  southward  of  the  lati- 
tude of  49  ° ,  so  that  if  the  line  due  west  from  the  Lake 
of  the  Woods  is  to  be  the  boundary  with  the  United 
States  of  America,  and  if,  contrary  to  my  expectation, 
Lord  Selkirk's  colony  should  continue  to  flourish,  it 
will  not  be  a  British  but  an  American  settlement, 
unless  specially  excepted  in  the  adjustment  of  the 
boundary." 

Hence  it  appears  that  the  British  Government 
were  perfectly  aware  that  the  country  in  question 
was  claimed  by  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  under 
their  Charter,  and  yet  that  they  did  not  scruple  to 
give  it   up  to  the   United  States  by  the  treaty, 


GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND.  51 

without  either  demanding  from  the  United  States, 
or  offering  to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  or  to 
Lord  Selkirk,  any  compensation  whatever ;  and  that 
neither  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  or  Lord 
Selkirk,  ever  made  any  claim  for  such  compen- 
sation, although  they  asserted  their  property  in  the 
territory.  This  shews  how  far  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  thought  the  grant  made  in  their 
Charter  would  bear  the  test  of  critical  or  legal 
scrutiny. 

In  fine,  then,  with  respect  to  the  grant  of  the  soil 
of  Rupert's  Land,  we  believe  that  the  time  will 
shortly  arrive  when  the  whole  claim  of  the  Hud- 
son's Bay  Company  will  be  exposed,  from  beginning 
to  end,  as  a  monstrous  imposition.  Let  it  be  admit- 
ted that  the  Crown  does  possess  the  right  of  grant- 
ing away  the  waste  lands  of  its  Colonial  possessions, 
without  the  intervention  of  Parhament :  we  are  far 
from  desiring  to  interfere  Avith  an  ancient  preroga- 
tive :  but  here  is  a  gift  made  in  language  which  it 
is  utterly  impossible  to  interpret,  of  a  country  which 
did  not  belong  to  the  Monarch  who  made  that 
grant,  and  which  was  distinctly  assigned  to  another 
Power  subsequently  to  the  grant.  The  grant  itself 
is,  moreover,  similar  to  many  others  which  emanated 
from  the  Crown  at  the  same  and  at  an    earlier 

e2 


52  GRANT  OF  SOIL  OF  RUPERT's  LAND. 

period,  but  which  were,  for  the  most  part,  recalled, 
when  it  became  manifest  that  they  were  no  longer 
consistent  with  the  public  interests ; — a  grant  which 
the  possessors  have  never  once  dared  to  defend  in  a 
Court  of  Law,  or  upon  any  occasion  when  the  validity 
of  their  pretensions  could  be  called  in  question. 
Rather  than  this,  they  have  consented  to  the  loss  of 
a  considerable  part  of  their  most  valuable  property  ; 
because,  had  they  claimed  it,  or  compensation  for  it, 
the  whole  question  of  the  validity  of  their  Charter 
must  have  been  called  in  question :  rather  than 
this,  when  they  could  no  longer  drive  the  North- 
West  Fur  Company  of  Canada  out  of  their  pre- 
tended territories,  they  consented  to  share  with 
it  their  privileges  and  their  spoil,  so  only  that  all 
others  might  be  excluded. 

It  has  been  asserted  above,  that  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  have  never  dared  to  assert  the  validity 
of  their  Charter  in  a  Court  of  Law. 

It  may  be  answered,  that  it  was  only  their  busi- 
ness to  defend  it  when  attacked  by  others. 

But  they  have  not  even  done  this,  but 
have  compromised  matters,  in  order  to  prevent 
the  question  being  brought  to  issue  in  a  Court 
of  Law- 

The  story  of  the  feud  between  the  North-West 


GRANT  OF  SOIL  OF  RUPERt's  LAND.  53 

Company  of  Montreal  and  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany is  briefly  as  follows. 

The  fact  has  already  come  mider  our  notice,  thai 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  did  nothing  whatsoever 
to  explore  the  centre  of  the  continent ;  that  for 
more  than  half  a  century  after  their  formation,  all 
they  did  was  to  establish  four  or  five  insignificant 
forts  on  the  shores  of  James'  and  Hudson's  Bay,  and 
to  carry  on  a  trade  in  furs  with  those  Indians  who 
resorted  thither. 

From  a  period  commencing  many  years  before 
the  date  of  the  first  existence  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company,  the  French  Canadians,  penetrating  into 
the  countries  west  of  the  Canadas,  carried  on  an 
extensive  traffic  with  all  the  Indian  tribes  of  those 
districts.  How  far  they  ultimately  pushed  their 
way  is  not  certain,  but  it  is  said  up  to  the  very 
sources  of  the  Saskatchwan.  The  North- West  Fur 
Company  of  Montreal  followed  in  the  same  track. 
A  glance  at  the  map  will  shew  the  reader  the 
difference  between  the  operations  of  this  and  of  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  :  and  the  same  glance  will 
suffice  to  prove  that  nothing  can  be  more  monstrous 
and  absurd  than  to  say  that  King  Charles  II. 
intended  that  the  arduous  enterprise  of  the  Cana- 
dians, driving  their  trade  up  the  stream  which  ran 


54         GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND.  ' 

into  their  own  river,  at  a  distance  of  nearly  a  thou- 
sand miles  from  Hudson's  Bay,  should  be  over- 
thrown by  a  grant  which  contemplates  an  approach 
through  the  Hudson  Straits  alone. 

The  Canadian  North- West  Company  carried 
their  enterprise  to  an  extent  of  which  their  char- 
tered rival  had  never  dreamt,  and  ultimately  passed 
the  Rocky  Mountains,  and  opened  up  the  rich  and 
valuable  district  of  the  Columbia. 

By  bad  management,  or  want  of  enterprise,  or 
other  causes,  the  stock  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany became  much  depreciated,  and  the  Earl  of 
Selkirk  became  one  of  the  Shareholders  to  a  very 
large  amount,  and  acquired  a  predominant  interest 
in  the  counsels  of  the  Company.  A  grant  of  land, 
amounting  to  16,000  square  miles  of  country,  was 
made  to  this  nobleman  by  the  Directors  of  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company,  nominally  for  the  purpose 
of  colonization. 

Now  as  a  great  deal  of  stress  has  been  laid  upon  the 
Red  River  settlement  as  exhibiting  the  colonizing 
spirit  of  the  Company,  although  it  is  notorious  that 
that  colony  was  founded  by  Lord  Selkirk  in  spite  of 
the  remonstrance  of  the  Shareholders,  it  is  necessary 
to  inquire  whether  there  be  not  a  far  more  obvious 
reason  for  the  establishment  of  this  colony,  than 


GRANT    OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND.  55 

any  desire  on  the  part  either  of  the  Company  or  of 
Lord  Selkirk  himself  merely  to  develope  the  agri- 
cultural resources  of  the  country. 

If  we  look  at  the  map,  we  may  observe  the  line 
of  traffic  pursued  by  the  North- West  Company. 
It  passed  up  the  St.  Lawrence  and  the  Lakes,  to 
Fort  William,  on  Lake  Superior,  where  the  chief 
Depot  and  Factory  of  tlie  Company  was  established. 
Thence  the  articles  of  traffic  and  the  furs  were 
carried  up  and  down  the  river,  through  the  Lake  of 
the  Woods  into  Lake  AVinnipeg,  or  fm-ther  south 
along  the  plains,  crossing  the  course  of  the  Red  River. 
This  was  the  direct  and  the  only  line  by  which 
their  communication  was  kept  up  with  all  the  trading 
posts  in  the  interior  of  the  country  :  by  it  food  and 
articles  of  commerce  were  sent  from  Fort  William, 
and  furs  were  brought  back  in  return. 

The  Red  River  colony  was  planted  by  Lord 
Selkirk  exactly  in  the  line  of  this  traffic.  The 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  seem  to  have  been  very 
jealous  of  the  prosperous  trade  carried  on  by  their 
rivals  ;  and  they  now,  for  the  first  time,  when  they 
found  themselves  utterly  unable  to  cope  in  fair 
enterprise  with  the  Canadian  Company,  began  to 
assert  the  monstrous  privileges  of  their  Charter. 
The  very  first  occasion  of  a  quarrel  between  the 


56  GRANT    OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERt's    LAND. 

North- West  Company's  servants  and  the  new  colony, 
seems  to  have  been  upon  the  occasion  of  the  governor 
of  the  Red  River  settlement  seizing  some  of  the  food 
which  was  on  its  way  to  supply  the  posts  of  the 
North- West  Company  in  the  interior  of  the  country. 
This  is  an  extremely  suspicious  fact,  and  throws  a 
good  deal  of   light  upon  the   real  intention  with 
which  the  colony  was  founded.     By  planting  a  set- 
tlement in  that  spot,  the  whole  supply  of  food  and 
necessaries,  by  which  the  traffic  of  the  North- West 
Company  was  carried  on,  could  be  cut  off,  and  the 
trade  at  once  annihilated.   It  was  not  the  design  of  a 
feeble  mind,  nor  was  it  very  unlike  the  bold  and  un- 
scrupulous policy  which  has  evinced  itself  in  many 
passages  of  the  Company's  history.     And  when  we 
consider  that  their  affairs  were  then  in  anything  but 
a  flourishing  condition,  it  is  not  at  all  imlikely  that 
the  Company  may  have  been  induced  by  the  enter- 
prising nobleman  who  exercised  so  much  influence 
over  their  affairs,  to  adopt  this  step    in  order  to 
crush  a  rival,  and  to  sweep  the  whole  of  his  profits 
into  their  own  coffers  ;  asserting,  for  the  first  time, 
the  extravagant  powers  vested  in  them  by  a  Charter 
granted  one  hundred  and  fifty  years  before,  and 
which  had  never  been  recalled  only  because  they  had 
never  before  been  asserted. 


GRANT  OF  SOIL  OF  RUPERT's  LAND.    57 

It  is  needless  to  enter  into  the  details  of  the 
savage  and  brutal  strife  which  was  carried  on  for 
some  time  between  the  rival  Companies.  Suffice  it 
to  say,  there  were  ample  grounds  to  have  brought 
the  question  to  a  final  issue  in  a  Court  of  Law,  had 
such  been  the  policy  of  the  Company. 

Their  Charter  contains  special  provisions  enabling 
them  to  defend  their  property.  Of  these  powers 
we  shall  have  to  speak  hereafter :  they  were 
such,  however,  as  the  Company  never  dared  to 
exercise  ;  because  such  exercise  would  have  brought 
tlie  question  at  once  to  a  legal  decision. 

The  Company  adopted  another  and  wiser  policy. 
They  bribed  rivals  whom  they  could  not  defeat, 
and  the  two  Companies  united  and  agreed  to  carry 
on  the  fur  trade  together,  to  the  exclusion  of  all 
others. 

To  those  who  had  read  the  mutual  recriminations 
that  had  been  bandied  between  these  two  bodies,  it 
was  a  strange  sight  to  see  the  names  of  Messrs. 
M'Gillivray  and  Edward  Ellice  associated  with 
that  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company.  To  see  men 
going  hand-in-hand  who  had  openly  accused  one 
another  of  the  foulest  crimes — of  wholesale  rob- 
bery— of    allowing    their    servants    to    instigate 


58  GRANT    OF    SOIL    OF    RUPERt's    LAND. 

the  Indian  tribes  to  murder  the  servants  of  their 
rivals, — this  was  a  strange  sight.  And  to  see 
gentlemen  who  had  publicly  denied  the  validity  of 
the  Company's  Charter  ;  who  had  taken  the  opinion 
of  the  leading  counsel  of  the  day  against  it;  who 
had  tried  every  means,  lawful  and  unlawful,  to  over- 
throw it ;  to  see  these  same  men  range  themselves 
imder  its  protection,  and,  asserting  all  that  they  had 
before  denied,  proclaim  its  validity  as  soon  as  they 
were  admitted  to  share  its  advantages  :  who,  without 
its  pale,  asserted  the  rights  of  British  subjects 
against  its  monopoly ;  and  within  its  pale,  asserted 
its  monopoly  against  the  rights  of  British  subjects — 
this  too  was  a  strange  sight.  Yet  to  all  this  did  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  submit  rather  than  subject 
their  Charter  and  their  claims  to  the  investigation 
of  a  Court  of  Law. 

These  are  the  grounds,  then,  upon  which  are 
founded  the  claims  of  a  Company  who  exercise  a 
vast  and  uncontrolable  power.  I  think  there  are 
few,  who  will  take  the  trouble  to  read  this 
chapter,  who  will  not  arrive  at  the  conclusion, 
that  the  claim  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  to  a 
territory  many  times  greater  than  Great  Britain, 
is  altogether   fictitious :    and    yet   I   am    certain, 


GRANT   OF    SOIL   OF    RUPERT's    LAND.  59 

a  perusal  of  the  other  three  chapters  respecting 
the  Company's  privileges,  will  leave  a  conviction  on 
the  mind,  that,  of  all  their  claims,  that  to  territorial 
property  is  by  no  means  the  one  most  contrary  to 
law. 


CHAPTER  III. 


of  the  charter  of  the  hudson  8  bay  company, 
in  respect  to  the  validity  of  the  grant 
of  the  right  of  exclusive  trade  with 
Rupert's  land. 

The  second  privilege  granted  by  their  Charter  to 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  is  that  of  the  exclusive 
trade  over  the  territories  called  Ruperts  Land.  This 
is  a  grant  of  an  entirely  different  kind  from  the 
former,  and  must  be  discussed  on  different  grounds. 
It  has  been  said  that  the  claims  of  the  Company 
to  territorial  property  are  the  least  illegal  of 
all  which  they  assert ;  for,  however  the  Crown  may 
have  possessed  the  right,  by  the  law  of  England,  to 
grant  away  the  waste  lands  of  the  Colonies,  the 
Crown  never  did  possess  the  right  to  grant  privi- 
leges of  exclusive  trade. 

The  privilege  of  exclusive  trade,  in  the  present 
case,  is  asserted  against  three  parties  :  first,  against 
any  other  merchants  in  this  country,  who  are  thereby 
forbidden  to  trade  to  the  country  in  question ; 
secondly,  against  the  native  population,   who   are 


EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERT's    LAND.    61 

prevented  from  selling  their  furs  to  any  but  privi- 
leged dealers;  and,  thirdly,  against  any  British 
subjects  who  may  settle  as  colonists  in  the  countries 
included  within  the  limits  of  the  Charter,  and  who 
are  debarred  from  trading,  either  with  the  native 
population,  or  with  the  mother  coimtry. 

Now  there  is  only  one  case  recorded  in  which  it 
was  ever  suggested  that  the  King's  licence  was 
necessary  in  order  to  allow  a  trade  with  infidels  :  it 
is  the  case  of  the  "  East  India  Company  v.  Sandys  ;" 
and  that  opinion  has  since  been  declared  not  to  be 
law  :  but  as  to  the  first  and  third  of  the  above  men- 
tioned modes  in  which  the  claims  of  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  are  exercised,  they  are  absolutely 
against  the  most  explicit  and  distinct  declarations  of 
the  law. 

Let  us  understand  distinctly  what  it  is  which  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  claim  under  their  Charter. 
They  claim  that  they  alone  shall  import  any  manu- 
factured goods  into  Rupert's  Land.  They  will  not 
permit  any  ships  except  their  own,  to  sail  into 
Hudson's  Bay :  consequently,  the  whole  import  of 
goods  of  all  kinds,  for  the  use  of  the  settlers  at  the 
Red  River,  which  they  assert  is  within  the  limits  of 
Rupert's  Land,  is  a  strict  and  complete  monopoly  in 
the  hands  of  the  Company.     It  is  true  they  allow 


62    EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERt's    LAND. 

others  to  import  some  goods ;  but  then  they  insist 
on  a  licence  being  first  obtained  from  the  Company ; 
and  they  only  grant  that  licence  to  those  who  do  not 
interfere  with  their  interest  in  the  fur  trade  :  they 
allow  such  goods  to  be  imported  only  in  their  own 
ships  ;  and  they  never  permit  more  than  a  limited 
quantity  to  be  imported  by  private  individuals. 
Besides  this,  they  subject  all  such  imported  goods  to 
duties,  the  amount  of  which  is  regulated  by  the  sole 
authority  of  the  Company,  and  is  limited  only  by 
the  capacity  of  the  settlers  to  satisfy  its  demands. 

Now  the  Company  assert  that  their  traffic  is  not 
a  monopoly,  because  they  have  to  compete  with  the 
Russian  and  the  American  fur  traders  in  the  London 
market.  Their  trade  is  a  monopoly  even  against  the 
British  merchants,  so  far  as  this, — that  the  merchants 
can  buy  furs  from  no  English  fm*  trader  except 
the  Company  ;  but  it  is  a  perfect  monopoly  against 
the  settlers  of  the  Red  River,  who  are  equally 
British  subjects  with  any  one  in  England,  and  are 
equally  entitled  to  the  privileges  of  British  law. 

It  is  laid  down  in  Stephens's  Blackstone,  as  the 
law  of  England,  with  respect  to  Colonies,  that  "  in 
conquered  or  ceded  Countries,  that  have  already 
laws  of  their  own,  these  laws  remain  in  force  until 
changed  by  competent    authority ;    while,   on  the 


EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERt's    LAND.     63 

other  hand,  it  hath  been  held,  that  if  an  unin- 
habited country  be  discovered  and  planted  by  Eng- 
lish subjects,  all  the  English  laws  then  in  being,  which 
are  the  birthright  of  every  subject,  are  then  in  force." 

Now  the  Charter  declares  that  the  territory  in 
question,  over  which  it  grants  the  privilege  of 
exclusive  trade,  shall  be  one  of  His  Majesty's 
"  Plantations  or  Colonies  in  America,'^  and  shall  be 
called  Ruperfs  Land. 

If  the  position  which  has  been  put  forward  above 
be  a  just  one,  that  the  country  in  question  was  not 
the  property  of  the  Crown,  then  the  grant  of  the 
soil  of  Rupert's  Land  is  altogether  invalid  ;  but, 
if  that  part  of  the  grant  be  good,  then  the  country 
in  question  became  a  British  colony,  and  all  law 
then  in  existence,  was  in  force  at  once  throughout 
its  limits. 

There  seems  to  be  no  escaping  from  this  dilemma. 
Either  the  grant  of  the  territorial  property  is  invalid, 
or  the  country  is  a  British  colony:  that  which 
gives  validity  to  the  grant  of  the  one,  necessitates 
the  admission  of  the  other :  and  no  sooner  had  the 
Crown  issued  the  mandate,  by  which  Rupert's  Land 
became  a  British  colony,  than,  by  the  same  deed, 
British  law  was  communicated  to  the  remotest  verge 
of  its  forests. 


64    EXCLUSIVE  TRADE  WITH  RUPERt's  LAND. 

The  question  then  is  reduced  to  this, — What  has 
ever  been  the  British  law  in  respect  of  monopolies 
in  trade  ?  because  if  there  were  no  right  to  grant 
monopolies  in  England,  there  was  as  little  right  to 
grant  them  in  Rupert's  Land  :  the  Crown  could  no 
more  bestow  privileges  of  exclusive  trade  in  Hud- 
son's Bay  than  in  Holborn. 

Lord  Coke,  in  his  exposition  of  the  Statute, 
Magna  Charta,  says, — 

"  Tlie  common  law  hath  so  admeasured  the  preroga- 
tives of  the  King,  that  they  should  not  take,  nor  pre- 
judice, the  inheritance  of  any  :  and  the  best  inheritance 
the  subject  hath,  is  the  law  of  the  land.  Upon  this 
chapter,  as  by  the  said  particulars  may  appear,  this  con- 
clusion is  necessarily  gathered,  that  all  monopolies 
concerning  trade  and  traffic,  are  against  the  liberty  and 
freedom  declared  and  granted  by  this  great  Charter, 
and  against  divers  other  Acts  of  Parliament,  which  are 
good  commentaries  upon  this  chapter."* 

The  Statute  21  Jas.  I.,  cap.  3,  would  seem  to  set 
the  question  at  rest  for  ever,  as  to  what  the  law  of 
England  had  ever  been  in  respect  of  monopolies. 
That  Statute  declared,  that "  all  monopolies,  and  all " 
"  Charters,"  "  granted  to  any  persons"  or  "bodies 
corporate,"  "  for  the  sole  buying,  selling,  &c."  "  of 
anything  within  this  realm,"  "  are  altogether  con- 

*  2  lust.,  vol.  i.,  p.  62. 


EXCLUSIVE   TRADE    WITH    RUPERT's    LAND.    65 

trary  to  the  laws  of  this  realm,  and  so  are  and  shall 
be  utterly  void  and  of  none  effect,"  &c. 

And  Lord  Coke,  in  his  Chapter  against  Monopo- 
lists, says, — 

"  It  appeareth  by  the  preamble  of  this  Act,  as  a 
judgment  in  Parliament,  that  grants  of  monopolies  are 
against  the  ancient  and  fundamental  laws  of  this 
kingdom,  and  therefore  it  is  necessary  to  define  what  a 
monopoly  is.  A  monopoly  is  an  institution  or  allowance 
by  the  King,  by  his  grant,  commission,  or  otherwise,  to 
any  person  or  persons,  bodies  politique  or  corporate,  of, 
or  for  the  sole  buying,  selling,  making,  working,  or 
using  of  anything,  whereby  any  person  or  persons, 
bodies  politique  or  corporate,  are  sought  to  be  restrained 
of  any  freedom  or  liberty  that  they  had  before,  or 
hindered  in  their  lawful  trade." 

And  again — 

"  This  Act  is  forcibly  and  vehemently  framed  for  the 
suppression  of  all  monopolies,  for  monopolies  in  times 
past  were  ever  without  law,  but  never  without  friends."* 

But  not  only  has  the  law  been  thus  expounded  in 
the  abstract,  but  numerous  cases  are  on  record  in 
which  claims  similar  to  those  which  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  make,  and  under  similar  Charters  to 
theirs,  have  been  brought  before  Courts  of  Law, 
and  have  been  invariably  decided  against  the  claim- 
ants of  exclusive  right  of  trade. 

•  3  Iiut.,  p.  181, 


66    EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERT's    LAND. 

In  the  case  of  "  Hayes  v.  Harding,"  reported  in 
Hardie's  Reports,  in  the  time  of  Lord  Hale,  the 
following  passage  occurs  in  the  judgment  of  that 
great  Judge. 

"  I  know  very  well  that  common  and  vulgar  judg- 
ments run  high  against  all  such  patents,  and  condemn 
them  before  they  understand  them,  as  being  contrary  to 
the  liberty  of  the  subject,  and  the  freedom  of  trade ; 
but  they  that  consider  them  better,  are  not  so  hasty  and 
rash  in  their  censures.  For  certainly,  upon  a  serious 
consideration,  all  such  patents  and  bye  laws  as  tend 
most  to  the  well  regulating  and  ordering  of  trades,  and 
the  better  management  of  them,  so  that  the  benefit  of 
them  may  be  derived  to  the  greater  part  of  the  people, 
though  with  a  prejudice  to  some  particular  persons,  have 
always  been  allowed  by  the  law.  £ut  patents  which 
tend  to  the  engrossing  of  trade,  merchandise,  and 
manufactures,  though  of  never  so  small  value,  into  one 
or  a  few  hands  only,  have  always  been  held  unreason- 
able and  unwarrantable." 

Lord  Coke  cites  the  case,  Mich.  2  &  3  Eliz. 
(Dier  manuscripts,  not  printed) : — 

"  King  Philip  and  Queen  Mary,  by  their  letters  patent, 
granted  to  the  Mayor,  Bailiffs,  and  Burgesses,  of  South- 
ampton, and  their  successors,  (for  that  King  Philip  first 
landed  there,)  that  no  wines  called  malmsies,  be  brought 
into  this  realm,  but  only  at  the  said  town  and  port  of 
Southampton,  with  a  prohibition,  that  no  person  or  per- 
sons shall  doe  otherwise,  upon  paine  to  pay  treble  cus- 
tome  ;  and  it  was  resolved  by  all  the  Judges  of  England, 
that  this  grant  made  in  restraint  of  the  landing  of  the 
same  wines  was  against  the  laws  and  statutes  of  the 


EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERt's    LAND.      67 

realm ;  and  also,  that  the  assessment  of  treble  custome 
was  against  law  and  merely  void ;  and  after,  at  the 
Parliament  holden  anno  5  Eliz.,  the  patent  as  to  aliens 
was  by  a  private  Act  confirmed  by  Parliament,  and  not 
for  English." 

In  the  case  of  the  "  Taylors  de  Ipswich  v.  Sher- 
ring,"  1  Roll.  R.,  p.  4,  Lord  Coke,  Chief  Justice, 

says, — 

"  Et  semble  que  nul  trade,  mechanique,  nee  merchant, 
poet  estre  hinder  par  le  patent  del  Koy,  ne  en  aucun 
part  sous  Act  de  Parliament  9  Hen.  III.,  c.  1,  un  Charter 
a  hinder  trade  at  sea  is  void." 

In  "  Le  Roy  v.  Cusake,"  2  Roll.  R.,  p.  113,  a 
license  of  sole  buying  and  selling  of  merchandize 
imported  into  Dublin,  granted  to  the  Masters, 
Wardens,  Brethren,  and  Sisters  of  Trinity  Isle, 
was  held  illegal  and  void.  , 

In  the  case  of  the  "  Attorney-General  v.  Alum," 
Hardies  R.,  p.  108,  when  the  Russia  Company  had 
been  incorporated  imder  letters  patent  confirmed  by 
statute,  the  Court  said, — 

"  The  act  is  a  mere  act  of  creation,  and  to  regulate 
those  of  the  Company  who  trade  separate,  to  the  preju- 
dice of  the  joint  stock  of  the  Company,  and  if  it  were 
an  act  of  confirmation,  it  would  be  a  void  act,  because 
the  letters  patent  themselves  are  void,  being  to  appro- 
priate a  trade,  which  the  King  cannot  do  by  law." 

The  marginal  note  of  the  case  of  the  "  Company 

f2 


68      EXCLUSIVE   TRADE   WITH    RUPERt's    LAND. 

of  Merchant  Adventurers  against  Rebow,"  reported, 
3  Modern  R.,  p.  126,  is  as  follows : — 

"  The  King  cannot,  by  his  Charter,  grant  to  a  society 
of  merchants  the  exclusive  privilege  of  trading  to  par- 
ticular places,  and  in  particular  articles,  unless  he  is 
previously  authorised  by  Parliament  to  do  so." 

In  6  Coke's  R.,  85,  there  is  given  "  The  Case  of 
Monopolies."  The  case  was  one  in  which  the  sole 
right  of  importing  playing  cards  into  England  had 
been  granted  to  an  individual.  It  was  argued  for 
the  defendants,  and  resolved  by  Chief-Justice 
Popham,  "  et  per  totam  curiam," — 

"  That  the  dispensation  or  licence  to  have  the  sole 
importation  and  merchandizing  of  cards  without  any 
limitation  or  strict,  notwithstanding  the  Act  3  Ed.  IV., 
c.  4,  is  utterly  against  law." 

'  There  is,  however,  another  view  of  the  case.  To 
grant  a  right  of  exclusive  trade,  and  not  to  provide 
some  means  of  enforcing  that  right,  would  be  mani- 
festly of  no  use  whatever.  Hence,  in  the  Charters 
which  emanated  from  the  Crown  at  this  period,  a 
power  was  in  most  cases  granted  to  seize  the  per- 
sons, ships,  and  goods  of  "interloping  traffickers." 
In  the  case  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  the 
power  was  given  as  usual ;  and  the  ships  thus  seized 
were  to  be  brought  to  England,  there  to  be  con- 
demned, and  the  value  forfeited,  one  half  to  the 


EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH   RUPERT's    LAND.      69 

Crown,  the  other  half  to  the  Company.  There  was 
also  a  power  given  to  the  Governor  and  Committee 
to  call  before  them  such  "  interlopers,"  and  bind 
them  in  the  sum  of  one  thousand  pounds,  never 
again  to  traffic  in  the  forbidden  seas. 

Now  it  is  quite  obvious,  that  if  there  be  no  power 
by  which  an  exclusive  trade  can  be  maintained,  the 
exclusive  trade  itself  falls  to  the  ground.  And  it 
would  seem  to  follow,  that  if,  when  the  Crown  has 
granted  a  privilege,  an  infringement  of  such  privi- 
lege cannot  be  punished  in  an  ordinary  Court  of 
Law,  and  if  the  Crown  have  no  power  to  create  an 
extraneous  authority  for  the  punishment  of  such 
infringements,  then  the  right  of  granting  the  privilege 
in  question  must  be,  practically,  invalid  altogether. 

Now,  that  the  Crown  cannot  grant  the  right  to 
enforce  tlie  privileges  of  exclusive  trade,  otherwise 
than  by  the  ordinary  processes  of  law,  has  been 
decided  over  and  over  again. 

In  the  case  "  Nightingale  v.  Bridges,"  it  was  ad- 
mitted, without  argument,  that  the  King  could  not 
grant  a  power  to  seize  ships  engaged  in  a  trade  pro- 
hibited by  Charter  from  the  Crown. 

In  Viner's  Abridg.,  (vol.  17,  p.  213,)  there  is  a  case 
reported  exactly  in  point.  It  appears  that  the  Afri- 
can Company  seized  a  ship  which  was  trading  within 


70    EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERt's    LAND. 

certain  limits,  the  trade  of  which  had  heen  granted 
to  that  Company  by  Royal  Charter.  The  Company 
had  the  vessel  condemned  in  the  Admiralty  Court ; 
and  the  owner  brought  an  action  at  common  law 
against  the  Company,  who  pleaded  the  privileges  of 
their  Charter.  The  result  of  this  trial  completely 
upholds  the  views  we  are  endeavouring  to  enforce. 
It  is  thus  reported  : — 

"  In  trover  of  a  ship,  the  jury  found  that  Charles  II. 
granted  to  the  African  Company,  all  the  regions, 
countries,  &c.,  from  Sally  inclusive,  to  Cape  of  Good 
Hope  inclusive,  with  all  islands  near  adjoining  to  those 
coasts,  &c.,  and  all  ports,  &c.,  to  hold  to  them  and  to 
their  successors  for  1,000  years,  with  licence  to  them, 
and  to  no  others,  to  send  ships,  &c.,  and  to  have  all 
mines  of  gold  and  silver  there,  &c.,  and  the  entire  and 
only  liberty  to  trade  there ;  any  law  or  statute  to  the 
contrary  notwithstanding,  and  prohibiting  any  to  trade 
there,  unless  by  licence  first  had,  under  pain  of  im- 
prisonment during  pleasure,  and  the  forfeiture  of  ships 
and  goods,  &c.,  with  power  to  search  and  seize,  &c.,  one 
moiety  to  the  King,  and  the  other  to  the  Company ; 
and  erected  a  Court  of  Judicature,  for  hearing  and  de- 
termining all  cases  of  seizure  for  trading  thither.  The 
Company,  by  virtue  of  this  grant,  authorised  certain 
persons  to  seize  the  ships,  &c.  of  such  as  should  trade 
with  an  infidel  country,  within  the  limits  of  that  Com- 
pany. Accordingly,  the  defendants  seized  the  plaintifTs 
ship  and  goods,  and,  at  the  defendant's  instance,  there 
was  a  process  in  the  Admiralty  against  the  said  ship  ; 
and  none  appearing  for  her  there,  she  was  condenmed  ; 
but  whether  the  defendent  be  guilty,  the  jury  say  they 


EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERt's    LAND.      71 

know  not,  et  si,  &c.,  pro  quer,  damages  to  £4,300.  6s., 
and  costs  to  £2.  3*.  4c?.,  et  si  pro  defend,  &c. 

"  This  special  verdict  was  obtained  at  the  importunity 
of  their  Majesties'  counsel  for  the  defendant.  It  was 
adjudged  for  the  plaintiff"  bt/  the  whole  Court." 

A  similar  case  is  reported  in  the  same  volmne, 
17  Vin.Abr.,  213:— 

"  The  trespass  for  seizing  a  ship,  &c.,  whereby  the 
plaintiff  lost  his  voyage,  the  defendant  justified  under 
the  Canary  patent,  granted  by  the  King  to  such  per- 
sons to  have  the  sole  trade,  &c.,  but  the  plaintiff  had 
judgment ;  for  the  King  cannot  grant  that  the  subjects' 
goods  shall  be  forfeited  for  doing  a  thing  prohibited  by 
patent." 

Nor  are  we  compelled  to  draw  our  own  conclu- 
sions, obvious  as  those  conclusions  must  be,  from 
the  mass  of  legal  authority  above  quoted. 

They  have  already  been  applied  to  the  case  of 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  by  some  of  the  most 
eminent  of  the  English  Bar. 

The  opinion  given  by  Sir  Arthur  Pigott,  Ser- 
jeant Spankie,  and  Lord  Brougham,  has  been 
already  quoted,  so  far  as  it  regards  the  question  of 
the  validity  and  interpretation  of  the  grant  of  the 
soil  of  Rupert's  Land.  That  part  of  the  same 
opinion  which  treats  of  the  grant  of  privileges  of 
exclusive  trade  is  as  follows  : — 


72      EXCLUSIVE    TRADE   WITH    RUPERT's    LANI>. 

Questions   and     Opinions    of    Sir    Arthur    Pigott, 
Mr.  Spankie,  and  Mr.  Brougham,  January  1816. 

"  1st.  "Whether  the  exclusive  trade,  territories,  powers, 
and  privileges,  granted  by  the  Charter  of  Charles  II., 
confirmed  by  the  expired  Act  of  King  William,  is  a 
legal  grant,  and  such  as  the  Crown  was  warranted  in 
making ;  and  if  it  was,  whether  it  entitles  the  Company 
to  exclude  the  Canadian  traders  from  entering  their 
territory  to  trade  with  the  Indians,  and  authorises  the 
Governors,  and  other  officers  appointed  by  the  Com- 
pany, to  seize  and  confiscate  the  goods  of  the  persons  so 
trading,  without  the  licence  of  the  Company. 

"  The  prerogative  of  the  Crown  to  grant  an  exclusive 
trade  was  formerly  very  much  agitated  in  the  great 
case  of  'The  East  India  Company  v.  Sandys.'  The 
Court  of  King's  Bench,  in  which  Lord  Jeffries  then 
presided,  held  and  decided,  that  such  a  grant  was  legal. 
We  are  not  aware  that  there  has  since  been  any  decision 
expressly  on  this  question  in  the  Courts  of  Law,  and 
most  of  the  Charters  for  exclusive  trade,  and  exclusive 
privileges  to  Companies  or  Associations,  have,  since  the 
Revolution,  received  such  a  degree  of  legislative  sanction 
and  recognition,  as  perhaps  to  preclude  the  necessity  of 
any  judicial  decision  on  it.  Much  more  moderate 
opinions  were,  however,  entertained  concerning  the 
extent  of  the  prerogative,  after  the  Revolution,  than 
prevailed  in  the  latter  part  of  the  reign  of  Charles  II., 
aijd  in  the  reign  of  James  II. ;  and  to  those  is  to  be 
attributed  the  frequent  recourse  which,  after  the  Revo- 
lution, was  had  to  legislative  authority  in  such  cases, 
and  particularly  in  the  very  case  of  this  Company, 
evidenced  by  the  temporary  Act  of  the  2nd  William  and 
Mary,  '  for  confirming  to  the  Governor  and  Company 
trading  to  Hudson's  Bay,  their  privileges  and  trade  ;'  a 
confirmation,  the  duration  of  which,  the  Legislature  ex- 


EXCLUSIVE   TRADE   WITH    RUPERt's    LAND.    73 

pressly  limited  to  seven  years,  and  the  end  of  the  then 
next  Session  of  Parliament,  and  no  longer  ;  and  part  of 
the  preamble  of  that  Act  is,  in  effect,  a  legislative 
declaration  of  the  insufficiency  and  inadequacy  of  the 
Charter  for  the  purposes  professed  in  it,  without  the  aid 
and  authority  of  the  Legislature  ;  which  legislative  aid 
and  authority  entirely  ceased  soon  after  the  expiration 
of  seven  years  after  that  Act  passed. 

"In  1745,  indeed,  the  18th  Geo.  IL,  cap.  17,  for 
granting  a  reward  for  the  discovery  of  a  north-west 
passage  through  Hudson's  Straits,  enacts,  '  that  nothing 
therein  contained  shall  any  ways  extend,  or  be  con- 
strued to  take  away  or  prejudice'  any  of  the  estate, 
rights,  or  privileges  of  or  belonging  to  the  Governor  and 
Company  of  Adventurers  of  England,  trading  into 
Hudson's  Bay  ;' — but  this  provision  gives  no  validity 
whatever  to  the  Charter,  and  only  leaves  its  effect  and 
authority  as  they  stood  before  that  Act,  and  entirely 
unaffected  by  it. 

"  These  Parliamentary  proceedings  may  at  least  justify 
the  inference,  that  the  extent  of  the  prerogative  in  this 
matter  was  considered  a  subject  which  admitted  of 
great  doubt,  in  times  when  the  independence  of  the 
Judges  insured  a  more  temperate  and  impartial  con- 
sideration of  it.  They  may,  however,  be  perhaps, 
considered  as  too  equivocal  to  afford  any  certain  and 
conclusive  authority  on  the  strict  question  of  law. 
Such  rights,  therefore,  as  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
can  derive  from  the  Crown  alone,  under  this  extra- 
ordinary Charter,  such  as  it  is,  may  not  be  effected  by 
these  proceedings  or  declarations,  and  they  may  now 
rest  entirely  upon,  and  stand  or  fall  by,  the  common 
law  prerogative  of  the  Crown  to  make  such  a  grant. 

"  Upon  the  general  question  of  the  right  of  the  Crown 
to  make  such  a  grant,  perhaps  it  may  not  be  necessary 
for  the  present  purpose  that  we  should  give  any  opinion. 


74     EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERt's  LAND. 

The  right  of  the  Crown  merely  to  erect  a  Company 
trading  by  Charter,  and  make  a  grant  of  territory  in 
King  Charles  II.'s  reign,  may  not  be  disputable  : 
and,  on  the  other  hand,  besides  that  this  Charter  seems 
to  create,  or  attempts  to  create,  a  Joint  Stock  Company, 
and  to  grant  an  exclusive  right  of  trade,  there  are 
various  clauses  in  the  Charter,  particularly  those  em- 
powering the  Company  to  impose  fines  and  penalties,  to 
seize  or  confiscate  goods  and  ships,  and  seize  or  arrest 
the  persons  of  interlopers,  and  compel  them  to  give 
security  in  £1,000,  &c.  &c.,  which  are  altogether 
illegal,  and  were  always  so  admitted  to  be,  and  among 
other  times,  even  at  the  time,  when  the  extent  of  the 
prerogative  in  this  matter  was  maintained  at  its  height, 
to  grant  an  exclusive  right  to  trade  abroad  ;  and  even  if 
by  virtue  of  their  Charter  they  could  maintain  an 
exclusive  right  to  trade,  we  are  clearly  of  opinion,  that 
they  and  their  officers,  agents,  or  servants,  could  not 
justify  any  seizure  of  goods,  imposition  of  fine  or 
penalty,  or  arrest  or  imprisonment,  of  the  persons  of 
any  of  His  Majesty's  subjects.  Probably  the  Company 
would  have  some  diflRculty  in  finding  a  legal  mode  of 
proceeding  against  any  of  those  who  infringe  their 
alledged  exclusive  rights  of  trading,  or  violate  their 
claimed  territory  ;  for  we  hold  it  to  be  clear,  that  the 
methods  pointed  out  by  the  Charter  would  be  illegal, 
and  could  not  be  supported." 

There  have  been  two  other  opinions  taken  upon 
this  subject,  both  of  them  by  men  who  are  entitled 
to  the  greatest  respect, — Mr.  Bearcroft  and  Sir 
Vickery  Gibbs.     They  are  as  follows  : — 


EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERT's    LAND.    75 

Mr.  Bearcroff s  Opinion. 

"  Question  1.  Whether  the  KJng,  without  the  co- 
operation of  the  other  legislative  powers,  can  grant  to  any 
Company  an  exclusive  trade  for  ever,  together  with  a 
right  of  seizing  the  person  and  goods  of  a  fellow-subject, 
without  legal  process ;  and,  if  not,  whether  his  having 
illegally  granted  such  advantages  and  power,  does  not 
annul  the  Charter? 

"  Anstcer.  I  am  of  opinion  that  the  King,  without  the 
assent  of  Parliament,  cannot  legally  grant  to  any  Com- 
pany, or  to  any  individual,  an  exclusive  trade  for  ever, 
together  with  a  right  to  seize  the  person  and  goods  of 
subjects,  without  process  of  law  ;  and  that  such  a  grant, 
if  made,  is  illegal,  void,  and  without  effect. 

"  Q.  2.  If  this  Charter  is  not  valid  upon  the  principle 
above  stated,  whether  it  is  not  voidable  by  the  Company's 
neglecting  to  fulfil  the  views  the  King  had  when  he 
granted  it  ? 

"  A.  If  such  a  Charter  could  be  considered  legal  and 
valid  in  its  commencement,  yet  it  will  be  voidable  by  Sci, 
Fa.,  if  the  grantees  neglect  to  endeavour,  by  reasonable 
and  adequate  means,  to  carry  the  purpose  of  it  into  effect. 

"  Q.  3.  Whether  the  grant  to  them,  of  the  right  of 
fishipg,  is  exclusive ;  or  whether  the  Greenland  fisher- 
men, who  have  a  right  to  fish  at  Greenland  and  the  seas 
adjacent,  have  not  a  right  to  fish  at  Hudson's  Bay  ? 

"  A.  The  Charter  in  question,  as  to  so  much  of  it  as 
affects  to  grant  an  exclusive  trade,  and  inflict  penalties 
and  forfeitures,  being,  as  I  conceive,  illegal  and  void, 
I  am  of  opinion,  that  the  Greenland  fishermen,  who 
have  a  right  to  fish  there,  have  also  a  right  to  fish  in 
Hudson's  Bay. 

"  Q.  4.  If  an  individual  invades  the  Charter,  by  fishing 
or  trading  in  any  of  the  places  granted  to  the  Company, 
and  they  seize  his  people,  ship,  or  goods,  whether  they 
have  any,  and  what  remedy  ? 


76    EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERT's    LAND. 

"  A.  If  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  or  those  acting 
under  their  authority,  shall  venture  to  seize  the  person, 
ship,  or  goods  of  a  British  subject  fishing  there,  the 
action  is  by  action  of  trespass  against  the  Company,  or 
against  the  persons  who  do  the  act  complained  of,  which 
action  may  be  brought  in  any  of  the  Courts  of  West- 
minster Hall. 

"  Q.  5.  If  you  should  be  of  opinion  that  the  Charter 
is  in  its  present  form  illegal,  which  is  the  best  way  of 
attacking  it ;  by  invading  the  patent,  and  permitting 
them  to  seize  and  bring  an  action,  and  complaining 
or  defending,  according  to  circumstances,  or  by  applying 
to  Parliament? 

"A.  It  is  obvious,  that  the  safest  way  of  attacking 
the  Charter  is  by  applying  to  Parliament,  or  by  Sci. 
Fa.^  though  in  case  of  seizure,  I  cannot  help  thinking, 
an  action  of  trespass  by  the  party  injured,  would  be 
successful. 

"  Q.  6.  And  generally  to  advise  the  parties  proposing 
the  present  case,  who  wish  to  fish  and  trade  in  and  near 
Hudson's  Bay  (and  have  sent  out  a  ship  which  means  to 
winter  there,  unless  cut  off  by  the  Company's  engines, 
and  only  wait  for  your  opinion  whether  to  send  several 
more)  for  the  best  ? 

"  ^.  Upon  the  whole  of  this  case,  I  am  strongly  in- 
clined to  think  that  the  parties  interested,  if  it  is  an 
object  of  importance  to  them,  may  venture  to  carry  on 
the  proposed  trade  immediately.  The  case  of  the  East 
India  Company  and  Sandys,  determined  at  such  a  time, 
and  by  such  Judges  as  it  was,  I  cannot  take  to  be  law ; 
and  as  to  the  length  the  said  Charter  has  been  granted 
and  enjoyed,  it  is  a  clear  and  well-known  maxim  of 
law,  that  which  is  not  valid  in  the  beginning,  cannot 
become  so  by  lapse  of  time. 

(Signed)         "  Edward  Beakcroft." 


EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERt's    LAND.    77 

Mr,  Gibhs*  Opinion. 

"  1st.  Such  a  Charter  may  certainly  be  good  in  some 
cases ;  but  I  am  of  opinion,  that  the  Charter  in  ques- 
tion was  originally  void,  because  it  purports  to  confer 
on  the  Company  exclusive  privileges  of  trading,  which 
I  think  the  Crown  would  not  grant  without  the  au- 
thority of  Parliament.  In  '  Sandys  against  the  East  India 
Company,*  Skinn,  132,  165,  199,  223,  the  arguments 
used  against  their  Charter,  which  was  not  then  con- 
firmed by  Acts  of  Parliament,  appear  to  me  decisive 
upon  the  subject ;  and  although  both  Judge  Jefferies, 
and  the  other  Judges  of  the  King's  Bench,  decided  in 
favour  of  the  Cliarter,  I  have  understood  that  their 
judgment  was  afterwards  reversed  in  Parliament. 

"  Adam  Smith,  in  his  '  Wealth  of  Nations,'  treats  it  as 
an  admitted  point,  that  the  Charter  granted  to  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company,  and  others  of  the  like  sort, 
not  being  confirmed  by  Parliament,  are  void,  which  I 
mention  not  as  a  legal  authority,  but  only  to  shew  how 
the  question  has  been  generally  understood. 

"  2nd.  A  Charter  may  be  forfeited  on  this  ground. 

"  3rd.  I  should  doubt  whether  they  had  by  this  acqui- 
escence forfeited  their  exclusive  privilege,  if  it  ever 
existed  ;  but  this  question  is  immaterial  after  my  answer 
to  the  first. 

"  4th.  If  the  former  were  legal,  this  would  be  so  like- 
wise ;  I  think  both  legal,  on  the  grounds  of  my  answer 
to  the  first  query. 

"  5th.  Probably  they  might  prosecute  the  Captain ;  but 
if  this  question  were  material,  it  would  be  necessary 
that  I  should  see  a  copy  or  abstract  of  the  Charter, 
before  I  could  answer  it. 

"  6th.  He  might,  if  there  were  any  legal  cause  of  pro- 
secution. 

"  7th.  I  hardly  think  that  they  would  be  held  to  fall 
within  this  Act,  nor  does  it  signify  whether  they  do  or 
not.     If  my  opinion  is  well  founded,  the  North- West 


78    EXCLUSIVE    TRADE   WITH    RUPERt's    LAND. 

Company  may  navigate  Hudson's  Bay,  and  carry  on 
their  trade  as  they  please,  without  any  fear  of  legal 
molestation,  in  consequence  of  the  monopoly  claimed 
by  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  under  their  Charter, 
and  I  think  they  may  act  as  if  no  such  Charter  existed. 

(Signed)         "  V.  Gibbs." 
^^ Lincoln's  Inn,  January  7th,  1804." 

It  does  seem  then  that  this  Company,  notwith- 
standing the  time  which  has  elapsed  dm-ing  which 
it  has  exercised  its  powers,  has  really  no  more  right, 
in  law,  to  the  monstrous  privileges  to  which  it  lays 
claim,  than  any  one  of  those  other  Companies  which 
once  possessed  similar  powers,  all  of  which  were 
cancelled  or  destroyed. 

The  only  grounds  upon  which  there  seems  to  be  a 
shadow  of  sanction  given  to  the  Charter,  are  those 
upon  which  the  case  of  "  Sandys  and  the  East  India 
Company  "  seems  to  have  been  decided  ;  viz.,  that 
the  Crown  had  the  right  to  grant  a  right  of  exclu- 
sive trade  with  infidels,  because  no  one  had  a  right 
to  such  trade  at  all  without  the  Royal  licence.  I 
doubt  much  if  a  Judge  could  be  found  in  the  pre- 
sent day  to  decide  that  such  was  English  law ;  nor 
did  the  East  India  Company  depend  on  the  decision 
in  their  favour,  for  they  procured  an  Act  of  Parlia- 
ment to  confirm  their  claims.  The  question  raised, 
however,  in  the  case  of  the  East  India  Company,  is 
totally  distinct  from   that  which  we  are  now   ar- 


EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERt's    LAND.     79 

guing.  The  present  question  is,  AVhether  a  right  of 
exclusive  trade  can  be  given  with  British  subjects 
and  Christians  in  a  British  colony;  and  that  is 
clearly  against  the  law :  it  is  a  monopoly. 

The  only  argument  advanced  to  shew  that  the 
Company's  trade  is  not  a  monopoly,  is  that  the 
Russian  and  American  fur  traders  compete  with  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  in  the  London  market. 

This  argument  may  be  satisfactory  to  those  who 
think  that  there  is  no  place  in  all  the  British  empire 
but  London,  and  that  as  long  as  the  interests  of  a  few 
London  merchants  are  consulted,  it  is  of  little  con- 
sequence what  becomes  of  all  the  world  besides. 
But  the  person,  of  all  others,  to  whom  such  an 
argument  should  be  most  unpalateable,  is  Her 
Majesty's  Secretary  of  State  for  the  Colonies. 

That  a  nobleman,  whose  peculiar  office  it  is  to 
watch  over  the  interests  of  the  inhabitants  of  the 
British  colonies,  should  lend  the  weight  of  his  influ- 
ence and  authority  to  prop  up  the  despotism  of  a 
Company  of  Merchants,  is  a  strange  thing;  but  it 
is  still  more  strange  to  see  a  close  and  perpetual 
monopoly  defended  by  the  disciples  and  advocates  of 
the  principles  of  free  trade. 

If,  indeed,  attachment  to  those  principles  be 
regulated  by  the  amount  of  Parliamentary  interest 
they  can  purchase,  it  will,  of  course,  be  a  matter  of 


80    EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERt's    LAND. 

indifference,  if  the  only  sufferers  under  a  monopoly 
are  the  inhabitants  of  a  remote  colony,  or  the  wan- 
dering savage  of  the  woods. 

If  the  free  trade  creed  were  signed,  that  Parlia- 
mentary influence  might  be  maintained,  it  is  not  to 
be  wondered  at  should  a  monopoly  be  protected,  if 
the  same  end  can  be  gained :  and  the  scores  of  votes 
which  a  prince  merchant  carries  in  one  pocket,  are, 
unquestionably,  a  powerful  protection  to  the  shares 
of  the  Company  which  are  deposited  in  the  other. 

It  is  throwing  dust,  to  say  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  do  not  possess  a  monopoly  of  the  fur 
trade,  because  furs  from  foreign  markets  are  not 
excluded. 

Their  traffic  is,  practically,  a  monopoly  against 
the  British  traders  in  furs  ;  but  against  the  inhabit- 
ants of  the  Red  River  settlement  it  is  a  monopoly, 
not  in  one  article  or  another,  but  in  every  necessary 
and  luxury  of  life,  which  his  own  country  will  not 
produce :  and  above  all,  against  the  native  Indian 
it  has  more  devastating  effects  than  the  anathema 
of  an  interdict. 

One  would  have  supposed  that  North  America, 
above  all  places  on  the  face  of  the  globe,  would 
suggest,  in  the  scenes  which  its  history  recalls,  some 
ominous  warnings  to  those  who  treat  with  levity  and 
indifference  the  complaints  of  colonists. 


EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERt's    LAND.  81 

The  eight  or  ten  thousand  souls  at  the  Red 
River  are  not  so  important  a  body,  no  doubt,  as  the 
three  millions  who  won  their  independence,  and 
elevated  their  country — of  a  province  creating  an 
empire  ;  but  yet  we  are  told  that  these  colonists  at 
the  Red  River  are  the  outposts  of  Great  Britain  in 
that  part  of  the  world,  and  that  they  are  to  be  looked 
to  as  the  bulwark  against  American  aggression. 

If  it  be  so,  to  keep  them  under  their  present 
government  is  insanity.  They  are  living  not  fifty 
miles  from  a  territory  where  no  monopoly  could 
wrong  them,  and  they  do  not  cease  to  draw  com- 
parisons which  are  disadvantageous  to  their  own 
country.  If  the  Red  River  settlement  is  not  to  be 
given  up,  or  to  fall  into  the  hands  of  the  United 
States,  then  this  monopoly  must  be  annihilated,  and 
that  without  delay.  If  those  colonists  are  to  feel 
themselves  an  integral  part  of  this  great  empire, 
and  to  take  that  pride  in  so  feeling  which  is  the 
surest  guarantee  for  loyalty,  they  must  be  one  with 
England  in  her  laws  and  her  liberties. 

Were  we  to  search  the  records  of  English  history 
for  a  precedent,  to  teach  us  what  policy  should  be 
pursued  in  such  a  matter,  there  is  one  never  to  be 
forgotten  when  the  right  of  monopolies  is  called  in 
question.     In  the  reign  of  Queen  Elizabeth,  this 

a 


82    EXCLUSIVE    TRADE   WITH    RUPERt's   LAND. 

country  was  on  the  verge  of  rebellion,  in  conse- 
quence of  the  number  of  monopolies  granted  by  the 
Crown.  "There  seemed,"  says  Mr.  Macaulay,  "for  a 
moment,  to  be  some  danger  that  the  long  and  glorious 
reign  of  Elizabeth  would  have  a  shameful  and  dis- 
astrous end :  she,  however,  with  admirable  judg- 
ment and  temper,  declined  the  contest — ^put  herself 
at  the  head  of  the  reforming  party — ^redressed  the 
grievance — thanked  the  Commons,  in  touching  and 
dignified  language,  for  their  tender  care  of  the 
general  weal — ^brought  back  to  herself  the  hearts  of 
the  people — and  left  to  her  successors  a  memorable 
example  of  the  way  in  which  it  behoves  a  ruler  to 
deal  with  public  movements  which  he  has  not  the 
means  of  resisting."  The  touching  and  dignified 
language  of  Queen  Elizabeth  is  too  remarkable, 
and  too  significant  of  what  monopolies  were 
esteemed  even  in  those  days,  when  the  Royal 
power  was  at  an  unusual  height,  not  to  be  quoted 
here.  "  Gentlemen,"  said  the  Queen  to  the 
Commons,  "I  owe  you  hearty  thanks  and  com- 
mendations for  your  singular  good  will  towards 
me,  not  only  in  your  hearts  and  thoughts,  but 
which  you  have  openly  expressed  and  declared, 
whereby  .you  have  recalled  me  from  an  error  pro- 
ceeding from  my  ignorance,  not  my  will.     These 


EXCLUSIVE   TRADE   WITH   RUPERT's   LAND.    83 

things  had,  undoubtedly,  turned  to  my  disgrace,  (to 
whom  nothing  is  more  dear  than  the  safety  and  love 
of  my  people,)  had  not  such  harpies  and  horse- 
leeches as  these  been  made  known  and  discovered  to 
me  by  you.  I  had  rather  my  heart  and  hand  should 
perish,  than  that  either  my  heart  or  hand  should 
allow  such  privileges  to  monopolists  as  may  be  pre- 
judicial to  my  people." 

So  odious  had  monopolies  come  to  be  esteemed, 
that  in  the  following  reign,  the  fact  of  having  ac- 
cepted a  patent  granting  a  monopoly,  was  pimished 
as  a  heinous  crime.  We  read  that,  in  1621,  a 
patent  was  granted  to  Sir  Giles  Montfesson  and  Sir 
Francis  Michel,  for  making  and  selling  gold  and 
silver  lace.  Montfesson  made  his  escape ;  but 
Michel  was  degraded  from  his  knighthood,  fined 
£l,000j  carried  on  horseback,  with  his  face  to  the 
tail,  through  the  streets  of  London,  and  then  im- 
prisoned for  life. 

Far  be  it  from  any  one  to  desire  a  revival  of  this 
summary  mode  of  punishing  monopolists.  It  would 
be  a  painful  and  humiliating  spectacle  to  see  the 
aged  and  venerable  Governor  of  a  great  Company 
degraded  from  his  knighthood,  fined  a  thousand 
pounds,  and  carried  on  a  horse,  with  his  face  to  the 
tail,  throughout  the  scenes  of  his  former  magnifi- 

o2 


84    EXCLUSIVE    TRADE    WITH    RUPERT's    LAND. 

cence.  Were,  however,  such  a  misfortune  possible, 
it  would  be  a  consolation  to  the  afflicted  monopolist 
to  know,  that  if  driven  from  the  Bank,  the  Trinity 
House,  or  even  from  Fenchurch  Street,  there  was 
still  a  refuge  for  the  destitute  open,  in  a  retired 
establishment  in  Downing  Street. 

This  may  seem  an  absurd  hypothesis.  Is  it, 
however,  more  absurd,  than  that  it  should  be  criminal 
and  disgraceful  to  be  the  proprietor  of  a  monopoly 
of  one  article  in  England,  and  that  it  should  be 
right  and  honourable  to  possess  a  monopoly  of  every 
article  in  an  English  colony  ? 


CHAPTER  IV. 


OF  THE  CHARTER  OF  THE  HUDSON  8  BAY  COM- 
PANY, IN  RESPECT  TO  THE  VALIDITY  OF  THE 
GRANT  OF  THE  RIGHT  OF  EXCLUSIVE  TRADE 
WITH    THE    INDIAN    TERRITORIES. 

The  next  point  to  be  noticed  in  the  Charter  of  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  is,  the  grant  which  was 
made  to  them,  of  the  right  of  exclusive  trade  with 
the  Indians,  over  all  those  coimtries  into  which  they 
might  Jind  access  by  land  or  loater  from  Rupert's 
Land,  and  with  all  adjoining  countries. 

This  is  the  country  which  is  called,  at  the  present 
day,  "The  Indian  Territories,"  and  the  right  of 
exclusive  trade  over  this  country  is  not  disputed. 
This  right  the  Company  hold  imder  the  Royal 
Licence  of  Trade,  granted  in  accordance  with  the 
Act  of  Parliament,  1  &  2  Geo.  IV.,  cap.  66. 

The  very  fact,  however,  of  an  Act  of  Parliament 
having  been  thought  necessary,  in  order  to  empower 
the  Crown  to  grant  a  licence  of  exclusive  trade  over 
the  Indian  territories,  seems  to  be  a  very  strong 
argument  that   the  same  right  of  trade  granted 


86    EXCLUSIVE  TRADE INDIAN  TERRITORIES. 

over  Rupert's  Land,  without  Act  of  Parliament,  is 
invalid. 

Of  the  right  of  exclusive  trade  generally,  enough 
has  already  been  said ;  but  there  is  an  important 
remark  to  be  made  as  to  that  provision  of  the 
Charter  which  extends  the  right  to  the  whole  of 
British  North  America,  except  the  Canadas  ; — 
(for  this  is  the  smallest  limit  that  can  be  assigned 
to  the  language  of  the  Charter;  how  much  more 
that  language  might  be  construed  to  mean, 
whether  the  whole  world  or  not,  we  cannot  tell ; 
but,  supposing  it  to  mean  the  countries  now  de- 
nominated "  The  Indian  Territories,"  that  is  to 
say,  all  British  North  America,  exclusive  of  the 
Canadas  and  of  Rupert's  Land,  the  remark  to  be 
made  is  this) — that  the  trade  of  the  same  country, 
the  exclusive  trade  of  which  was  granted  to  the 
Company  by  their  Charter  in  perpetuo,  is  now 
held  by  them  under  Act  of  Parliament  for  only  a 
limited  period.  The  way  this  came  about  was  as 
follows. 

We  have  already  mentioned,  that  at  the  time  of 
the  struggle  between  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
and  the  North- West  Company,  when  the  former 
found  that  it  was  impossible  to  beat  their  rivals, 
either  by  fair  trade  or  by  actual  violence,  and  that 


EXCLUSIVE  TBADE INDIAN  TERRITORIES.    87 

any  trial  at  law  would  involve  an  inquiry  into  the 
validity  of  their  Charter,  they  determined  to  com- 
promise the  matter,  which  was  done  in  the  follow- 
ing manner. 

An  Act  of  Parliament  was  first  procured  for  the 
purpose  of  empowering  His  Majesty  to  grant  to 
*'any  body  corporate  or  company,  or  person,  or 
persons,"  the  exclusive  privilege  of  trading  with  the 
Indians  in  all  such  parts  of  North  America,  not 
being  part  of  the  lands  and  territories  theretofore 
granted  to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  and  not 
being  part  of  any  of  the  provinces  in  North  America, 
or  belonging  to  the  United  States  of  America. 

It  was  previously  agreed,  that  as  soon  as  the  Act 
of  Parliament  should  be  passed,  a  grant  of  the  ex- 
clusive privilege  of  trading  with  the  Indians  shoiJd 
be  made  under  it  to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
and  to  the  leaders  of  the  North- West  Company, 
viz.,  Messrs,  William  and  Simon,  M'Gillivray,  and 
Edward  EUice,  conjointly.  This  was  accordingly 
done ;  and  the  grant  was  made  for  twenty-one  years. 
The  new  partners,  late  of  the  North- West  Company, 
were  to  share  all  the  profits  arising  from  the  fiirs 
obtained,  not  only  from  "  The  Indian  Territories," 
but  also  from  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  proper 
territories  of  Rupert's  Land. 


bb    EXCLUSIVE  TRADE INDIAN  TERRITORIES. 

Especial  attention  ought  to  be  paid  to  the  result 
of  passing  this  Act. 

It  empowers  the  Crown  to  grant  the  privilege  of 
exclusive  trade  throughout  the  Indian  territories,  to 
any  company,  corporation,  person,  or  persons.  But, 
by  the  Charter,  the  exclusive  trade  of  this  self- 
same territory  had  been  granted  to  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  one  hundred  and  fifty  years  before. 
The  Charter  gives  them  the  exclusive  trade  over  all 
the  lands  into  which  they  should  find  access  hy  land 
or  water,  out  of  Rupert's  Land.  The  Act  of  Par- 
liament, therefore,  empowers  the  Crown  to  grant, 
not  to  the  Hudson^ s  Bay  Company,  but  to  any  com- 
pany or  person,  identically  the  same  right  of  exclu- 
sive trade  which  the  Crown  had  previously  granted 
to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company.  The  Crown  might 
have  granted  this  right  of  exclusive  trade,  under 
the  new  Act,  to  any  other  corporation ;  and,  in 
fact,  it  did  not  make  the  grant,  at  first,  to  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  only,  but  to  that  Company 
and  the  leaders  of  the  North- West  Company,  con- 
jointly. 

So  far  then  from  this  Act  of  Parliament  con- 
firming or  recognizing  the  Charter,  it  directly  sets 
aside  one  of  its  most  important  provisions,  and  treats 
it  as  if  it  had  had  no  existence ;  because  it  em- 


EXCLUSIVE  TRADE — INDIAN  TERRITORIES.    89 

powers  the  Crown  to  grant  to  one  person  what  the 
Crown  had  by  its  own  authority  granted  to  another 
person. 

Now,  for  this  reason,  it  is  asserted  that  it  is  illegal 
for  the  Company  at  this  moment  to  exercise  the 
privilege  of  exclusive  trade  in  Rupert's  Land,  sup- 
posing such  a  place  to  exist.  Supposing,  for  a 
moment,  that  the  original  grant  of  the  country  be 
not  altogether  invalid  in  law ;  still  the  grant  of  a 
monopoly  of  the  trade  without  the  sanction  of  Par- 
liament, being  illegal,  and  Rupert's  Land  being 
excluded  from  the  operation  of  the  Act  of  Parlia- 
ment which  empowers  the  Crown  to  grant  the  right 
of  exclusive  trade  over  "  the  Indian  Territories," 
there  remains  no  right  on  earth  to  prevent  any  of 
the  inhabitants  of  any  place  within  what  may  be 
decided  to  be  the  legal  limits  of  Rupert's  Land, 
from  trafficking  in  furs  and  peltries  as  much  as  they 
please.  Nor  could  the  settlers  at  the  Red  River  do 
better  than  to  organise  themselves  into  a  Company  for 
the  traffic  of  furs,  sending  their  produce  down,  as  the 
North-West  Company  did  of  old,  by  the  Lake  of 
the  Woods,  and  Lake  Superior,  into  Canada.  The 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  would  not  now  dare  to 
resort  to  violence  to  put  an  end  to  this  general 


90    EXCLUSIVE  TRADE — INDIAN  TERRITORIES. 

movement  on  the  part  of  the  colonists ;  and  the 
least  attempt  to  suppress  the  trade  by  force  would 
result  in  a  trial  at  law. 

Sufficient  has  now  been  said  as  to  the  sanction 
upon  which  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  still  con- 
tinues to  exercise  its  despotic  power.  Some  of  its 
claims,  it  has  been  shewn,  are  altogether  invalid  ; 
some  have  been  utterly  set  aside  by  Parliament ; 
and  there  are  others  so  grossly  illegal,  that  the 
Company  have  not,  in  late  years  at  any  rate,  ven- 
tured to  enforce  them  openly  ;  such  as  the  right  to 
seize,  imprison,  and  fine  those  who  infiinge  the 
privileges  of  their  Charter. 

Whatever  may  be  the  result  of  the  present 
scrutiny  which  the  grasping  conduct  of  the  Com- 
pany has  provoked,  there  seems  to  be  no  proba- 
bility of  "  the  Indian  Territories"  being  emanci- 
pated from  their  sway  until  the  expiration  of  their 
Licence  of  Trade  in  1859. 

The  Company  are  fully  aware  that  their  pro- 
spect of  obtaining  a  renewal  of  that  licence  is  very 
small ;  but  the  possession  of  a  property  on  the  coast 
of  the  Pacific  will  be  the  best  argiunent  in  their 
favour.  Hence  their  anxiety  to  obtain  a  territorial 
footing  in  Vancouver's  Island :   hence  the  deter- 


EXCLUSIVE  TRADE — INDIAN  TERRITORIES.    91 

mination  of  all  who  are  not  blind  to  the  interests 
of  this  country,  and  to  the  extension  of  the  British 
power  and  race,  to  oppose  to  the  last  so  fatal  and 
mischievous  a  proposition. 


CHAPTER  V. 


OP  THE  CHARTER  OF  THE  HUDSON  S  BAY  COM- 
PANY, IN  RESPECT  OF  THE  RECOGNITION  WHICH 
IT  HAS  RECEIVED  FROM  ACTS  OF  PARLIA- 
MENT  AND    FROM   OTHER    PUBLIC    DOCUMENTS. 

Before  leaving  the  question  of  the  Charter  of  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company,  it  is  necessary  to  examine 
some  assertions  which  have  been  made,  to  the  effect 
that  its  validity  has  been  recognised  by  successive 
Sovereigns,  by  Acts  of  Parliament,  and  by  Treaties 
with  Foreign  Powers.  These  assertions  have  been 
made  by  Mr.  M.  Martin,  in  page  45  of  his  book. 
That  gentleman  says,  in  the  loose  style  of  assertion 
for  which  his  work  is  remarkable, — "  The  lawfulness 
of  the  Charter,  or  of  the  Company  founded  on  the 
Charter,  have  never  been  questioned  by  the  Crown 
or  by  Parliament ;  on  the  contrary,  there  has  been 
a  full  recognition  in  various  public  documents." 

No  one  ever  doubted  "  the  lawfulness  of  the  Com- 
pany founded  on  the  Charter y  Unless  indeed  it 
should  be  held  in  law,  that  a  Charter  granting  what 
the  CrowQ  had  not  the  power  to  grant,  is  null  and 


RECOGNITION    OF    THE    CHARTER.  93 

void  altogether:  to  use  this  language,  therefore, 
is  to  conceal  the  real  question.  The  question  at 
issue  is,  Are  the  powers  granted  hy  the  Charter  legal 
or  illegal  ?  And  have  those  powers  ever  been  re- 
cognised in  any  way,  or  |their  legality  ever  been 
asserted,  by  any  Act  of  Parliament? 

It  is  necessary  to  refer  to  the  various  occasions  on 
which  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  Charter  has 
been  noticed  by  the  Parliament  and  by  the  Crown. 

The  first  time  Parliament  interfered  was  in  1690, 
when  an  Act  was  passed  confirming  the  Charter, 
Mr.  M.  Martin  says,  "/or  eoer.^'  He  puts  these 
words  in  italics,  and  would  leave  readers  who  do  not 
refer  to  notes  at  the  foot  of  a  page,  in  small  type, 
with  the  belief  that  the  Charter  of  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  was  confirmed  by  Parliament  for 
ever.  There  cannot  be  anything  more  grossly  un- 
true. And  Mr.  Martin,  in  order  to  save  his  con- 
science, puts  the  remainder,  or  rather  a  part  of  the 
remainder,  of  the  story  into  a  note. 

The  real  story,  however,  is  this.  The  Company 
found  their  Charter  ineffectual  to  keep  out  inter- 
lopers from  sharing  the  profits  of  the  rising  fur  trade, 
80  they  themselves  petitioned  Parliament  for  an  Act. 
Now,  if  they  thought  their  Charter  valid,  what  was 
the  use  of  an  Act  of  Parliament?   They  did  so, 


94  RECOGNITION    OF    THE    CHARTER. 

because  they  knew  right-well  that  their  Charter  was 
not  valid ;  that  the  Crown  did  not,  and  never  did, 
possess  the  power  to  enable  any  one  to  seize  its 
subjects,  fine,  and  imprison  them,  without  trial. 
They  knew  that  had  they  acted  on  their  Charter 
in  these  and  other  matters,  the  Court  of  Law  would 
have  instantly  interfered  ;  so  they  petitioned  Par- 
liament for  a  "  confirmation  of  their  Charter."  A 
Bill  appears  to  have  been  smuggled  through  the 
House  as  far  as  the  third  reading,  when  the  Com- 
mons determined  that  the  confirmation  should 
last  only  for  ten  years,  '■^  and  no  longer  f^  so,  instead 
of  changing  the  words  of  the  Act,  which  would  at 
that  stage  have  necessitated  a  new  Bill  altogether, 
a  rider  was  attached,  limiting  the  duration  of  the 
Act  to  "  ten  years,  and  no  longer."  But  when  this 
Bill  went  up  to  the  Lords,  the  ten  was  changed  into 
seven^  and,  thus  amended,  the  Bill  became  law.  So 
far  then  from  the  Charter  being  confirmed  for  ever, 
as  Mr.  Martin  would  have  his  readers  believe,  it 
it  was  confirmed  but ybr  seven  years,  by  a  Bill  whose 
preamble  states  that  it  is  '■'■  necessary  that  such  a 
Company  should  have  sufficient  and  undoubted  powers 
and  authorities,^^  8fc.,  ^'^  which  cannot  he  so  effectually 
done  as  by  the  authority  of  Parliament ;"  thereby 
implying,  as  far  as  words  can,  that  the  powers  of 


RECOGNITION    OF   THE   CHARTER.  95 

the  Company  were  by  no  means  undoubted  or  suffi- 
cient, without  the  authority  of  Parliament. 

The  whole  story  of  the  passing  of  this  Act  shews 
most  clearly  that  the  Parliament  did  conceive  that 
its  sanction  was  necessary  to  the  validity  of  this 
Charter. 

But  Mr.  Martin's  note  adds,  "  This  Act  enabled 
the  Company  to  restrain  interlopers,  and  its  renewal 
on  expiring  at  the  end  of  seven  years  was  unneces- 
sary." Then  why  did  the  Company  introduce  a 
new  Bill  into  Parliament  at  the  end  of  seven  years  ? 
which  they  did.  The  Company  then  thought,  and 
Parliament  thought,  that  an  Act  of  Parliament  was 
necessary,  in  order  to  make  the  powers  vested  in  the 
Company  valid  and  legal.  The  Company,  however, 
did  not  risk  the  chance  of  the  Bill  being  actually 
rejected  by  the  House  of  Commons,  which  would 
have  settled  the  question  of  the  Charter  at  once, 
but  they  withdrew  it,  and  have  ever  since  acted  on 
the  policy  of  asserting  the  rights  of  their  Charter 
on  all  occasions,  except  where  there  was  a  prospect 
of  its  validity  being  submitted  to  a  legal  test,  in 
which  case  they  have  always  given  way.  So  much 
for  the  first  instance  cited  as  favourable  to  the 
Charter.  To  all  the  others,  one  remark  applies, 
viz.,  that  when  an  Act  of  Parliament  excepts  from  its 


96  RECOGNITION    OF    THE    CHARTER. 

action  the  estates,  rights,  or  privileges  of  a  Company, 
it  does  not  thereby  offer  any  opinion  whatsoever  as  to 
the  validity  of  those  rights  and  privileges :  it  is 
not  the  function  of  a  legislative  body  to  do  so :  that 
is  a  matter  for  a  judicial  tribunal.  The  Charter 
exists,  no  doubt ;  but  whether  it  be  legal  or  illegal, 
valid  or  invalid,  is  a  question  which  is  purely  one  of 
law.  There  can  be  nothing  more  absurd  than  to 
say  the  kind  of  allusion  which  is  made  in  the  Acts 
of  Parliament  quoted,  viz.,  6  Anne,  cap.  37  ;  14  Geo. 
III.,  cap.  83  ;  1  &  2  Geo.  IV.,  cap.  66 ;  give  any 
opinion  on  the  question,  one  way  or  the  other. 

In  the  6  Anne,  cap.  37,  the  only  allusion  to  the 
Company  is  a  proviso  in  the  23rd  section,  "that 
nothing  in  the  Act  shall  extend  or  be  construed  to 
take  away  or  prejudice  any  of  the  estates,  rights,  or 
privileges  of  or  belonging  to  the  Governor  and  Com- 
pany of  Adventurers  trading  into  Hudson's  Bay." 
The  provision  that  this  Act  shall  not  invalidate  such 
supposititious  rights,  does  not  preclude  their  being  in- 
validated on  any  other  legal  gromids,  nor  does  the 
mere  mention  of  rights  belonging  to  a  Company, 
assert  the  legality  of  the  claim  to  such  property.  The 
Act  14  Geo.  III.,  cap.  83,  merely  mentions  the  terri- 
tories of  the  Company  incidentally,  declaring  the 
boundary  of  Canada  to  lie  in  such  and  such  directions. 


RECOGNITION    OF    THE    CHARTER.  97 

and  "  northward  to  the  southern  boundary  of  the  ter- 
ritories granted  to  the  Company  of  Adventurers 
trading  into  Hudson's  Bay."  Treaties  have  often 
assumed  things  to  exist  which  did  not.  The  treaty 
which  settled  the  boundaries  between  the  United 
States  and  the  British  territories,  determined  that  it 
should  proceed  due  west  from  the  north-west  comer 
of  the  Lake  of  the  Woods,  until  it  intersected  the 
Mississippi ;  but  it  was  found  afterwards  that  these 
two  lines  never  did  intersect,  and  a  new  arrange- 
ment had  to  be  made.  Similarly,  if  no  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  exist  in  law,  a  new  Act  must  amend 
the  old  one.  But  it  would  be  as  sensible  to  assert 
that  the  line  drawn  due  west  from  the  north-west 
comer  of  the  Lake  of  the  Woods  did  intersect  the 
waters  of  the  Mississippi,  because  it  is  so  asserted  in 
a  treaty,  as  to  say  that  the  grant  to  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  of  a  tract  of  country  is  valid  in  law, 
because  an  Act  of  Parliament  makes  use  of  it  to 
define  a  geographical  outline. 

We  have  already  seen  that  the  Act  1  and  2  Geo. 
IV.,  cap.  66,  so  far  from  recognising  the  validity  of 
the  Crown  grant  of  exclusive  trade  over  the  Lidian 
terrritories,  positively  sets  it  aside,  and  treats  it  as 
if  it  had  never  been  competent  to  the  Crown  to 
make  such  a  grant.     But  this  is  not  the  only  way  in 

H 


98  RECOGNITION    OF    THE    CHARTER. 

which  this  Act  interferes  with  the  Charter.  It  is 
true  that  there  is  a  proviso  in  the  last  clause,  that 
the  Act  is  not  to  be  interpreted  to  prejudice  any  of 
the  rights  and  privileges  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany ;  but  it  uses  the  remarkable  words  respecting 
those  rights — ^which  the  Company  "  are  by  law 
entitled  to  claim  i^  as  though  the  Legislature  especi- 
ally declined  giving  any  opinion  as  to  whether  such 
claims  were  or  were  not  valid  in  law. 

This  Act  extends  the  operation  of  the  Act 
42  Geo.  III.,  cap.  138,  to  the  ten*itories  of  the  Hud- 
son's Bay  Company.  The  last-mentioned  Act  pro- 
vides that  crimes  committed  in  the  Indian  territories, 
which  it  declares,  in  the  preamble,  were  not  at  present 
"  cognizable  by  any  jurisdiction  whatever,"  should 
be  considered  as  if  committed  within  the  jurisdiction 
of  the  Canadian  Courts,  and  should  be  tried  in 
those  Courts  accordingly. 

The  Act  1  &  2  Geo.  IV.,  cap.  66,  states,  in  the 
preamble,  that  there  is  a  doubt  whether  the  pre- 
vious Act  refers  to  the  territories  granted  to  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company,  and  proceeds  to  enact 
that  it  shall  so  extend  over  them.  Here  again  it 
completely  sets  aside  the  Charter :  it  creates  a 
machinery  for  the  administration  of  justice,  inde- 
pendent of  the   Company,  although  the  requisite 


RECOGNITION    OF    THE    CHARTER.  99 

authority  for  such  administration  had  been  granted 
to  the  Company  by  their  Charter. 

Besides  which,  in  declaring  that  the  Act  42 
Geo.  III.,  cap.  138,  shall  refer  to,  and  extend 
over,  the  territories  of  the  Company,  it  would  seem 
at  the  same  time  to  extend  to  them  the  declaration 
in  the  preamble  of  that  Act,  viz.,  that  crimes  com- 
mitted in  such  territories  were  "  cognizable  by  no 
lawful  jurisdiction  whatsoever." 

It  is  beyond  question,  then,  that  the  Act  of 
George  IV.  completely  sets  aside  the  Charter  in 
every  point  in  which  they  come  in  collision. 

Thus  much  for  the  assertion  that  the  Charter  of 
the  Company  has  been  recognized  by  Acts  of  Par- 
liament. 

It  has  been  shewn,  not  only  that  the  Charter,  was 
not  sanctioned,  but  that  Parliamentary  sanction 
was  refused,  subsequently  to  the  passing  of  a 
temporary  Act  for  its  confirmation,  by  which  it 
was  expressly  intimated  that  the  Charter  was  not 
sufficient  without  the  ratification  of  Parliament. 

It  has  been  shewn  that  in  all  the  other  Acts  in 
which  it  has  been  mentioned,  a  reference  is  made 
to  it  merely  as  a  fact,  which  it  was;  and  that  no 
inference  of  any  kind  can  be  drawn  as  to  its  validity, 
or  the  contrary,  from  any  such  mention. 

H  2 


100  RECOGNITION    OF    THE    CHARTER. 

And  lastly,  it  has  been  shewn  that  whenever  it 
was  necessary  that  Parliament  should  legislate  upon 
subjects  which  involved  a  question  as  to  the  extent 
or  validity,  of  the  grants  made  by  the  Charter,  the 
rights  of  the  Company  have  been  treated  as  if  they 
had  no  existence  whatsoever. 

Nor  is  there  one  shadow  of  truth  in  the  assertion 
that  the  rights  of  the  Company  have  received  any 
recognition  in  treaties  with  Foreign  Powers.  We 
have  shewn  fully  that  the  Treaty  of  Ryswick  did 
not  recognize  them ;  but  that,  on  the  contrary,  had 
they  existed,  it  would  have  utterly  extinguished 
them. 

Equally  false  it  is  to  say  that  the  Treaty  of 
Utrecht  guaranteed  the  Company's  privileges.  The 
only  mention  made  of  the  Company  in  that  treaty, 
is  in  a  clause  which  provides  that  they  shall  be 
remunerated  for  their  losses  "according  to  the 
rule  of  justice  and  equity."  There  is  not  one 
syllable  about  the  rights  or  privileges,  nor  any 
allusion  to  other  than  the  fact  of  their  having 
suffered  loss  from  the  French,  for  which  they  were 
to  be  remunerated  according  to  an  estimate  made 
by  Commissioners  to  be  appointed. 

Nor  is  there  any  better  groimds  for  saying  that 
the  Treaty  of  Oregon  recognizes  these  claims.     Inr 


RECOGNITION    OF    THE    CHARTER.  101 

deed,  it  could  not  do  so,  because  the  operations  of 
the  Company  on  the  Pacific  are  under  Act  of  Par- 
liament, and  therefore  must  be  recognized  by  all, 
until  the  year  1859,  when  their  Licence  of  Trade  will 
expire. 

The  Treaty  of  Oregon  does  no  more  than  recog- 
nize the  existence  of  a  great  trading  company, 
having  the  exclusive  trade  and  power  in  the  British 
territory.  In  treating  of  the  possessory  rights  of 
tlie  Company,  it  places  all  British  subjects  on  the 
same  footing. 

We  have  thus  endeavoured,  at  some  length,  to 
investigate  the  truth  of  the  statements  which  have 
been  put  forward  by  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
(and  with  the  sanction,  it  would  seem,  of  Her  Ma- 
jesty's Government,)  as  to  the  validity  of  the  powers 
and  privileges  of  that  Corporation.  At  the  risk  of 
being  somewhat  tedious  to  the  general  reader,  we 
have  discussed  the  right  which  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  claim,  to  lock  up  for  ever  an  entire  con- 
tinent, to  keep  it  as  a  hunting  ground  for  their  own 
profit,  and  to  exclude  the  progress  of  population* 
civilization,  and  Christianity. 

The  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  Charter  was  like 
many  others  which  at  one  time  emanated  from  the 
Crown — but  it  has  outlived  them  all.     It  is  the  most 


jl()2  RECOGNITION    OF    THE    CHARTER. 

monstrous  of  all  monstrosities  of  that  age.  Many 
circumstances  have  tended  to  prolong  its  existence, 
but  none  more  than  the  subtle  and  selfish  wisdom  of 
its  Governors,  the  inscrutable  secrecy  of  its  trans- 
actions, the  distance  of  the  country,  and  the  facili- 
ties which  the  Company  possess  for  keeping  in- 
truders and  interlopers  from  interfering  with  their 
policy,  or  witnessing  their  operations  ;  and  now, 
when  a  general  inquiry  into  the  whole  commercial 
system  and  policy  of  this  empire  is  agitating  the 
minds  of  statesmen,  this  strange  and  obsolete 
Charter  comes  to  light,  like  a  toad  which  is  hewn  out 
of  a  rock,  where  it  has  lain  hid  for  ages,  and  is  yet 
alive  and  ugly  as  of  yore.  But  its  days  are  num- 
bered, and  it  will  probably  soon  find  a  quiet  resting 
place  amongst  some  of  its  fellows  and  peers,  on  the 
shelves  of  the  British  Museum. 

The  Hudson's  Bay  Company  are  not  very  anxious 
to  prolong  their  existence,  if  it  is  made  worth  their 
while  to  die  :  and  Sir  J.  H.  Pelly  has  indicated  the 
nature  of  the  rights  which  will  ensure  their  peace- 
able departure  from  this  life.  He  says,  in  a  letter 
to  Lord  Grey,  of  the  4th  March,  1848  :— "  As  far 
as  I  am  concerned,  (and  I  think  the  Company  would 
concur,  if  any  great  national  benefit  would  he  ex- 
pected from  it,)  I  would  be  willing  to  relinquish  the 


RECOGNITION   OF    THE    CHARTER.  103 

whole  of  the  territory  held  under  the  Charter,  on 
similar  terms  to  those  which  it  is  proposed  the  East 
India  Company  shall  receive  on  the  expiration  of 
their  Charter — namely,  securing  to  the  Proprietors 
an  interest  on  their  capital  of  ten  per  cent." 

A  Company  which  will  only  resign  a  precarious 
and  tottering  traffic,  for  a  Government  security  of 
ten  per  cent,  on  their  capital,  and  even  then  only  on 
the  expectation  of  a  great  national  benefit,  must, 
one  would  fancy,  be  in  the  enjoyment  of  extrava- 
gant profits  or  unlimited  patriotism. 

"  When  I  was  a  young  man,"  said  the  late  Rev. 
Sydney  Smith,  in  a  speech  at  Taunton,  "  the  place  in 
England  I  remember  as  most  notorious  for  highway- 
men and  their  exploits,  was  Finchley  Common,  near 
the  metropolis ;  but  Finchley  Common,  Gentlemen,  in 
the  progress  of  improvement  came  to  be  enclosed,  and 
the  highwaymen  lost  by  these  means  the  opportunity 
of  exercising  their  gallant  vocation.  I  remember  a 
friend  of  mine  proposed  to  draw  up  for  them  a 
petition  to  the  House  of  Commons  for  compensation, 
which  ran  in  this  manner : — '  We,  your  loyal  high- 
waymen of  Finchley  Common  and  its  neighbour- 
hood, having  at  a  great  expense  laid  in  a  stock  of 
blunderbusses,  pistols,  and  other  instruments  for 
plundering  the  public,  and  finding  ourselves  impeded 


104  RECOGNITION    OF    THE    CHARTER. 

in  the  exercise  of  our  calling  by  the  said  enclosure 
of  the  said  Common  of  Finchley,  humbly  petition 
your  Honourable  House  will  be  pleased  to  assign 
to  us  such  compensation  as  your  Honourable  House 
in  its  wisdom  and  justice  may  think  fit.'  Gentle- 
men, I  must  leave  the  application  to  you."* 

*  Works  of  the  Rev.  Sydney  Smith.      3  Vols.  8vo.      London. 
1840.     Second  Edition.     Vol.  iii.,  p.  116. 


CHAPTER  VI. 


of  the  results  of  the  charter  of  the 
Hudson's  bay  company,  as  affecting  the 
interests  of  the  mother  country. 

The  rights,  or  rather  the  claims,  of  the  Company 
have  hitherto  occupied  our  attention ;  but  let  us 
now  turn  to  the  results  which  have  ensued. 

K  the  reader  will  take  the  trouble  to  trace  those 
results  through  the  following  three  chapters,  in  their 
relation,  severally,  to  this  country, — to  the  Indian 
population, — and  to  the  colonists  who  have  settled  in 
the  Company's  territory,  he  will  probably  agree  in 
the  conclusions  at  which  we  have  arrived  respecting 
the  misfortune  and  mischief  which  may  be  antici- 
pated, from  the  proposed  extension  of  the  power 
and  influence  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company. 

In  this  chapter  we  have  to  trace  the  effects  of  the 
Company's  Charter  upon  our  own  country.  We 
have  to  investigate  the  value  of  the  assertions 
which  have  been  so  pompously  made,  that  England 
has  derived  great  benefit  from  the  existence  of  the 
Company ;  and,  in  doing  this,  we  have  especially 


106     EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN. 

to  bear  in  mind  that,  by  the  Royal  Charter  itself, 
the  public  good  was  specified  as  the  object  with  which 
its  privileges  were  granted  to  the  Company. 

We  have  already  seen  that  the  first  condition 
imposed  upon  the  Company,  as  a  duty  which  they 
were  given  to  perform,  and  in  return  for  the  ex- 
pected performance  of  which  their  privileges  and 
rights  were  granted,  was,  the  attempt  to  discover 
a  North- West  passage  into  the  Pacific  Ocean. 

The  Company  undertook  to  attempt  this  discovery, 
upon  certain  advantages  being  secured  to  them  as 
an  equivalent  for  their  trouble  and  expense. 

This  country  having  suffered  them  to  remain  in 
the  enjoyment  of  their  exclusive  privileges,  now  for 
more  than  a  century  and  a  half,  have  a  fair  right 
to  inquire  whether  they  have  performed  the  duties 
entrusted  to  them  ;  especially  the  first  duty  imposed, 
viz.,  that  of  discovery.  And  the  right  to  make  this 
inquiry  is  strengthened  by  the  fact  that  it  is  the 
constant  boast  of  the  Company  that  they  have  a 
claim  upon  our  gratitude  for  the  exertions  they 
have  made. 

Now  the  facts  respecting  the  discoveries  which 
the  Company  have  made,  or  attempted,  are  as 
follows : — 

In  1719  they  fitted  out  two  vessels,  the  Albany 


EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN.     107 

frigate,  and  the  Discovery  sloop,  for  the  purpose, 

as  we  are  told,  of  discovery.     This  was  nearly  fifty 

years  after  the  date  of  their  Charter.     It  was  the 

first  expedition  undertaken ;  and  there  seems  now 

to  be  much  doubt  whether  it  was,  properly  speaking, 

one  of  discovery  at  all.     Mr.  Robson,  who  writes 

within  thirty  years  afterwards,  says,  that  the  object 

of  the  voyage  was  the  discovery  of  gold  or  copper 

mines,  of  the  existence  of  which  Captain  Knight, 

then  Governor  of  the  Factory  on  Churchill  River, 

had  heard  reports  from  the  Indians  who  frequented 

that  place  : — 

"  Full  of  these  expectations,  he  came  to  England  to 
solicit  the  Company  to  fit  out  two  vessels,  under  his 
command,  for  the  discovery  of  these  rich  mines ;  but 
the  Company,  for  private  reasons,  refused  to  comply. 
Knight,  made  more  sanguine  by  an  opposition  which 
he  could  not  expect,  told  them  that  they  were  obliged 
by  their  Charter  to  make  discoveries,  and  extend  their 
trade,  and  particularly  to  search  for  a  North-West 
passage  by  the  Straits  of  Annian,  to  the  South  Sea ; 
but  that  if  they  would  not  fit  out  ships  under  him  and 
Barlow,  for  the  discovery  he  came  about,  he  would 
apply  to  the  Crown,  and  get  others  to  undertake  it ; 
and,  accordingly,  waited  upon  one  of  the  Secretaries  of 
State.  When  the  Company  perceived  him  so  resolute, 
and  that  his  troublesome  zeal,  if  left  to  itself,  might 
actually  bring  on  an  inquiry  into  the  legality  of  their 
Charter,  they  thought  it  necessary  to  comply,  and  fitted 
out  the  sloop  and  ship  before-mentioned."* 

*  Robson.    App.  No.  i.,  p.  36. 


108  EFFECTS    UPON    GREAT    BRITAIJJ. 

It  would  appear  from  the  above  narrative,  that 
the  expedition  was  undertaken  not  for  discovery,  but 
to  search  for  copper ;  and,  moreover,  that  it  was 
only  undertaken  at  all  in  self-defence,  for  fear  others 
should  intrude  on  their  privileges. 

There  seems  to  have  been  no  further  attempt 
made  on  the  part  of  the  Company  to  prosecute 
Arctic  discovery,  until  the  year  1769,  that  is  to  say, 
fifty  years  after  their  first  attempt,  and  just  a  cen- 
tury after  they  undertook  the  task. 

In  that  year  Hearne  commenced  his  expedition 
for  the  discovery,  not,  as  it  would  appear,  of  the 
country,  or  of  the  long-wished-for  passage  into  the 
Pacific  Ocean,  but,  again,  of  the  copper  mines  which 
were  said  to  exist  to  the  north  of  Fort  Churchill ; 
and,  it  is  so  stated  by  Hearne  himself,  in  the  Intro- 
duction to  the  Narrative.  That  the  discovery  of 
the  Arctic  Ocean  by  this  meritorious  traveller  was 
rather  an  accident  than  a  settled  purpose  of  his 
expedition,  must  be  evident  to  every  one  who  has 
read  his  work.  What  value  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  set  upon  this  discovery  is  best  seen  by 
the  fact  that "  Hearne's  Narrative  "  was  not  published 
till  the  year  1795,  twenty-six  years  after  the  expe- 
dition was  undertaken,  and  even  then,  if  we  are  to 
credit  LaPerouse,  only  in  consequence  of  a  promise 


EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN.     109 

made  to  him,  on  the  capture  of  the  Factories  in 
Hudson's  Bay  by  the  French,  in  1782. 

"  An  account  of  this  [Hearne's]  journey  was  found 
in  manuscript  among  the  papers  of  the  Governor,  who 
was  very  pressing  that  it  should  be  returned  to  him  as 
his  private  property.  As  the  journey  was  undertaken, 
however,  by  order  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  with 
a  view  of  obtaining  knowledge  of  the  northern  part  of 
America,  the  journal  of  it  might  have  been  considered 
with  propriety  as  belonging  to  the  Company,  and  now 
of  right  devolved  to  the  conqueror  ;  yet  the  goodness  of 
La  Perouse's  heart  induced  him  to  yield  to  the  urgent 
solicitation  of  Govenor  Hearne,  and  he  returned  the 
manuscript  to  him,  on  the  express  condition,  however, 
that  he  should  print  and  publish  it  immediately  on  his 
arrival  in  England.  This  agreement  does  not  appear 
to  have  been  fulfilled  to  the  present  day.  Let  us  hope 
that  the  remark  here  made,  when  it  becomes  public, 
will  effect  the  purpose."* 

Notwithstanding  this  declaration,  which  was 
printed  in  England  in  the  year  1791,  Heanie's 
travels  did  not  appear  until  a  few  years  afterwards, 
in  1795,  that  is  twenty-three  years  after  his  jour- 
neys were  preformed.  This  does  not  look  as  if 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  had  been  extremely 
anxious  to  promote  the  cause  of  Arctic  discovery. 

The  next  attempt  made  by  the  Company  was  in 

*  A  Voyage  roiintl  the  World,  &c.,  under  fhe  command  of 
J.  F.  G.  de  La  Perouse.  Translated  from  the  French.  London. 
1807.    Vol.  i.     Introduction,  p.  xxx.     See  also  Note  to  same  page. 


110  EFFECTS    UPON    GREAT    BRITAIN. 

1836,  more  than  sixty-four  years  after  Hearne's 
journey.  In  that  year  the  enterprising  traveller 
Thomas  Simpson,  commenced  his  discoveries,  of 
which  others  reaped  the  honours.  The  year  1836-7 
is  remarkable  in  the  history  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company.  In  that  year  the  supply  of  spirits  to  the 
Indians  is  reduced  ; — in  that  year  missionaries  are 
called  for ; — ^in  that  year  discovery  is  undertaken ; — 
and  in  that  year  the  Company  begin  to  negociate 
for  the  renewal  of  their  licence  of  exclusive  trade! 
This  is  significant.  Thus  in  one  hundred  and  fifty 
years  we  find  that  the  Company  made  but  three 
attempts  to  promote  the  task  which  they  undertook 
when  they  obtained  their  Charter ;  and  two  out  of 
the  three  were  made  over  land,  in  a  manner  which, 
however  creditable  to  the  enterprising  gentlemen 
who  led  the  expeditions,  were  made  with  no  trouble, 
and  very  little  expense,  to  the  Company,  who  reaped 
the  credit. 

There  is  another  significant  fact  to  be  noticed 
respecting  the  expedition  by  Dease  and  Simpson, 
viz.,  that  in  the  same  year  (1837)  the  Government 
were  sending  out  an  expedition  under  Captain  Back : 
and  the  Company  appears  to  have  acted  on  the 
same  principle  on  which  they  had  acted  in  1719, 
viz.,  to  delay  performing  their  duty  until  it  was 


EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN.     Ill 

manifest  that  it  would  be  performed  by  others,  and 
that  their  privileges  might  thereby  incur  risk. 

But  when  the  same  coincidence  occurs  again  in 
1846,  it  is  impossible  to  consider  it  the  result  of 
accident.  In  that  year  Captain  Franklin  was 
dispatched  by  the  British  Government  to  carry  on 
discovery  on  the  north  coast  of  America  :  and  in 
the  same  year  Dr.  Rae  was  sent  by  the  Company. 
The  Company  have,  then,  sent  out  but  four  expe- 
ditions from  the  year  1670  till  the  present  time,  of 
which  only  one  was  in  ships — that  is  to  say  of  such 
a  nature  as  to  involve  the  Company  in  any  great 
expense.  And  of  these  four  expeditions,  the  two 
first  were  not  to  obtain  geographical  information, 
but  to  discover  copper.  They  were,  in  fine,  it  would 
seem,  not  expeditions  of  discovery,  but,  in  a  great 
measure,  trading  speculations  ;  and  the  other  two 
were  both  undertaken  when  the  British  Govern- 
ment had  sent  out  similar  expeditions  ;  and  one  was 
made  in  order  to  enable  the  Company  to  put  for- 
ward their  claims  as  Arctic  discoverers,  when  they 
applied  for  the  renewal  of  their  licence  of  exclusive 
trade  with  the  Indians. 

But,  in  the  mean  time,  what  has  been  done  by  this 
country  to  promote  geographical  science  in  the  north 
of  America? 


112     EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN. 

This  is  a  question  of  the  greatest  importance  ; 
because,  when  it  is  asked  why  did  England  deprive 
her  merchants  of  the  right  of  sharing  in  a  lucrative 
traffic,  and  commit  the  whole  of  it  to  a  small  Cor- 
poration, consisting  of  a  very  few  individuals  ?  the 
answer  should  be,  at  least,  that  some  advantage  has 
been  gained  by  the  country  in  general,  to  compensate 
for  the  loss  which  was  inflicted  on  individuals.  But  we 
are  now  told  that  since  the  year  1815  alone,  "  more 
than  half  a  million  of  money  has  been  expended" 
on  the  task  which  it  was  committed  to  the  Company 
to  perform. 

Now  it  is  impossible  for  any  one  to  look  at  the 
simple  fact  of  what  the  Company  have  done,  com- 
pared with  what  England  has  herself  eficcted,  or  to 
compare  the  expenditure  of  the  Government  with 
that  of  the  Company,  and  to  say  that  this  country 
has  not  lost  immensely  by  the  bargain  which  it 
made,  when  it  gave  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
the  great  privilege  of  a  monopoly  of  the  fur  trade, 
on  the  condition  that  that  Company  should  under- 
take the  task  of  Arctic  discovery. 

But  the  Company  have  been  charged,  not  only 
with  neglecting  to  perform  the  task  allotted  to  them, 
but  even  with  endeavouring  to  deter  others  from 
making  the  attempt.     In  "  Middleton's  Geography," 


EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN.     113 

published  in  1771,  there  is  a  chapter  which  professes 
to  give  "  an  account  of  the  attempts  made  to  find 
out  a  North- West  passage  to  America."  The  author 
there  says: — 

"  It  has  been  generally  supposed,  and  with  reason, 
that  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  though  bound  by  their 
Charter  to  promote  the  discovery  of  a  North- West  pas- 
sage, hath  taken  every  method  to  prevent  the  accom- 
plishment of  it.  And  it  is  notoriously  known  that 
Captain  Middleton,  who,  in  1740,  was  sent  by  Govern- 
ment upon  that  service,  was  publicly  charged  with 
having  received  £5,000  as  a  bribe,  from  the  Members 
of  that  Company,  to  defeat  the  undertaking,  or  at  least 
to  conceal  the  success  of  it." 

At  the  end  of  the  chapter,  the  writer  returns  to 
the  same  subject. 

"  The  next  attempt  was  made  by  Captain  Middleton, 
as  already  mentioned ;  and  many  imagine  that  he  really 
found  the  paasage  so  long  sought  for,  but  by  sinister 
means  was  prevented  from  revealing  the  discoveries  he 
had  made,  and  even,  by  the  influence  of  bribery,  was 
induced  to  publish  a  false  journal  of  his  voyage.  So 
much  does  private  avarice  prevent  the  success  of  public 
discoveries. 

**  The  Legislature  being  made  sensible  of  these  pro- 
ceedings, passed  an  Act  for  the  encouragement  of 
adventurers  to  attempt  the  discovery  of  the  North- 
West  passage,  ofFerintj,  at  the  same  time,  so  liberal  a 
reward  as  would  probably  preclude  the  effects  of  bribery 
in  preventing  the  success  of  any  future  expedition."* 

*  Middleton's  Geography.  Folio.  London.  1778.  Vol.  ii., 
pp.  18,  19. 


114  EFFECTS    UPON  GREAT    BRITAIN. 

The  evidence  here  afforded  is  not  the  less  important, 
that  the  charge  is  only  alleged  as  a  supposition.  It 
proves,  at  any  rate,  what  the  character  of  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  was  at  that  time,  and  how  far  it  was 
considered  to  have  fulfilled  the  duties  entrusted  to  it. 

This  charge  may  seem  at  the  present  day  to  be 
very  absurd  and  scarcely  creditable,  yet  a  similar 
accusation  may  be  urged  with  justice  against  the  Com- 
pany even  now — viz.,  that  of  endeavouring  to  lower 
the  value  of  their  territories  in  the  eyes  of  the  public. 

The  Company  know  very  well  that  as  long  as 
there  is  a  general  belief  that  the  interior  of  the 
continent  of  America  is  of  no  value,  so  long  they 
may  feel  secure  in  the  possession  of  their  privileges ; 
and  therefore  the  idea  is  circulated,  that  the  whole 
country  north  of  the  49th  parallel  of  latitude,  is  a 
frozen  wilderness,  where  human  life  can  with  diffi- 
culty be  supported,  and  where  the  earth  will  not 
yield  its  accustomed  fruits :  and  the  same  facts  are 
assigned  as  the  necessary  and  imavoidable  cause  of 
those  awful  and  devastating  famines,  with  all  their 
fearful  accompaniments  of  starvation  and  cannibalism, 
to  which  the  miserable  natives  are  periodically 
exposed. 

The  Company  have  a  direct  interest  at  this 
moment  in  keeping  up  this  erroneous  idea. 


EFFECTS    UPON    GREAT    BRITAIN.  115 

There  is  a  good  example  of  how  the  facts  of  the 
case  may  be  distorted,  for  interested  motives,  in  the 
representations  made  at  first  about  the  country  in 
which  the  Red  River  settlement  is  situated.  The 
North- West  Company  saw  at  once  that  the  settle- 
ment was  directed  against,  and  would  be  fatal  to, 
their  trade ;  and  so  we  have,  in  their  efforts  to  cry 
it  down,  frequent  assertions  of  the  impossibility  of 
founding  a  settlement  in  so  remote  and  desolate  a 
country.  Yet  experience  has  shewn  that  there 
is  not  a  more  favourable  situation  on  the  face  of 
the  earth  for  the  employment  of  agricultural 
industry,  than  the  locality  of  the  Red  River,  As 
far  as  the  produce  of  the  soil  is  concerned,  the 
settlers  revel  in  abundance. 

In  the  work  by  Mr.  M.  Martin,  to  which  we 
have,  imfortunately,  frequent  occasion  to  allude, 
because  it  bears  all  the  appearance  of  authority,  it 
is  confidently  stated,  that  although  "there  are, 
doubtless,  several  spots,  such  as  the  Red  River, 
adapted  in  some  respects  for  European  settlements, 
they  are  like  oases  in  the  desert,  few  and  far 
between,  and  totally  inapplicable  for  extended 
colonization"  (p.  6)  ;  and  again,  that  "the  tract 
now  left  in  the  possession  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  will  require  great  care  and   industry  to 

i2 


116     EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN. 

render  even  the  most  promising  spots  productive  " 
(P-6). 

In  order  to  shew  how  little  truth  there  is  in  this 
statement,  it  will  not  be  without  utility  or  interest 
if  we  give  a  brief  account  of  the  physical  features 
of  this  country. 

The  territories  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
may  be  considered  as  containing  three  great  dis- 
tricts, totally  differing  in  their  general  aspect : 
these  may  be  called,  the  Woody  country,  the  Prairie 
country,  and  the  Barren  country. 

If  the  reader  will  look  at  the  accompanying  map, 
he  will  be  able  readily  to  trace  the  divisions  of 
these  three  districts.  The  woody  country  extends 
round  the  south  of  James'  Bay,  and  the  west  of 
Hudson's  Bay,  from  East  Main,  as  far  as  North 
Lined  Lake.  The  belt  of  wood  is  said  to  finish 
abruptly  at  this  lake, — one  side  being  a  forest,  and 
the  other  entirely  open  country.  The  breadth  of  the 
belt  of  wood  may  be  considered  to  be  pretty  nearly  the 
same  throughout ;  being  bounded,  as  has  been  said, 
towards  the  north-east  by  James'  and  Hudson's  Bay, 
and,  towards  the  south  and  west,  by  a  line  stretching 
along  the  north  of  Lake  Superior,  from  the  frontiers 
of  Canada,  through  the  Lake  of  the  Woods,  Lake 
Winnipeg,  Deer  Lake,  and  Wollaston  Lake. 


EFFECTS    UPON    GREAT    BRITAIN.  117 

It  is  not  asserted  that  all  the  country  within  the 
boundaries  here  described  is  a  forest,  or  that  all  the 
land  in  the  other  districts  is  barren,  or  open.  The 
general  features  of  each  district  are,  however,  such 
as  those  names  indicate.  Thus  the  general  feature 
of  the  country  in  the  broad  horse-shoe  belt  here 
described  is  forest.  A  line  from  the  shores  of 
Hudson's  Bay,  through  the  north  of  North  Lined 
Lake,  Lake  Athepescow,  to  Great  Slave  Lake,  and 
down  Mackenzie's  River,  will  cut  off  all  the  coimtry 
towards  the  north,  which  may  be  called  the  Barren 
district.  And  the  country  west  and  south  of  Lakes 
Winnipeg,  Deer,  WoUaston,  and  Athepescow,  as 
far  as  the  Rocky  Mountains,  may  be  denominated 
the  plain,  or  Prairie  district 

Now  it  may  be  quite  true  that  only  a  small  por- 
tion of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  territories  is 
fit  for  colonization,  and  indeed  for  anything  except 
the  chase ;  but  it  may  be,  and  is  true,  that  that 
small  portion  is  a  country  sufficiently  large  and 
fertile  to  support  all  the  population  of  Great  Britain 
and  all  her  dependencies. 

In  the  first  place,  there  is  the  neighbourhood  of 
the  Red  River,  which  experience  has  shewn  to  be 
fertile  in  the  extreme.  Then  there  is  the  whole 
country,  several  hundred  miles  in  extent,  between 


118  EFFECTS    UPON    GREAT   BRITAIN. 

the  Red  River  and  the  frontiers  of  Canada,  along 
the  line  of  rivers  and  lakes  which  connect  Lake 
Winnipeg  with  Lake  Superior,  It  is  needless  to 
make  any  long  references  to  authors  to  support  this 
assertion — that  this  is  a  magnificent  country  for 
colonization.  Sir  George  Simpson  speaks  in  the 
strongest  language  of  the  beauty  of  the  country, 
and  the  fertility  of  the  soil,  and  of  the  rich  and 
varied  produce  of  the  earth  in  its  wild  and  unculti- 
vated luxuriance.  Mr.  Ballantyne  dwells  in  his 
lively  and  spirited  manner  on  the  same  theme,  and 
many  who  have  passed  along  that  route  are  ready 
to  give  similar  evidence.  Had  not  the  North- West 
Company  of  Montreal  been  destroyed,  it  is  probable 
that  many  settlements  would,  by  this  time,  have 
sprung  up  in  the  channel  down  which  their  vast  fur 
traffic  was  poured  into  Canada.  But  the  waters 
and  woods  are  now  silent  and  deserted,  and  the 
whole  of  the  trade  is  diverted  to  the  desolate 
shores  of  Hudson's  Bay,  to  be  stowed  into  the 
"  annual  ships,"  for  the  London  market. 

If  the  Hudson's  Straits  were  the  only  entrance 
to  the  country,  as  the  Company  have  endeavoured 
to  make  them,  for  the  purpose  of  giving  themselves 
a  claim,  under  the  language  of  their  Charter,  to 
half  the  continent,  there  woidd  be  some  ground  for 


EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN.     119 

supposing  that  colonization  would  be  impossible :  for 
except  at  the  south,  those  shores  are  desolate  in  the 
extreme.  But  Mr.  Ballantyne  tells  us  that  when  he 
left  York  Factory,  on  the  shores  of  the  Bay,  where 
winter  still  reigned  in  all  its  severity,  only  a  few  miles 
inland  he  found  spring  far  advanced :  at  the  same 
period,  in  the  country  between  Lake  Superior  and  the 
Red  River,  it  would,  no  doubt,  have  been  summer. 

Much  has  been  said  of  the  extreme  cold  of  the 
country  as  indicated  by  the  thermometer.  It  is  well 
known,  however,  that  it  is  not  the  degree  but  the 
character  of  the  cold  which  renders  it  obnoxious  to 
men;  and  the  climate  of  this  country  is  quite  as 
agreeable,  if  not  more  so,  than  the  best  part  of 
Canada. 

The  height  of  the  latitude  gives  no  clue  whatso- 
ever to  the  degree  of  cold  or  to  the  nature  of  the 
climate.  Men  who  are  competent,  from  personal 
observation,  to  give  an  opinion,  assert  that  the  cold 
is  more  apparently  intense,  at  any  rate  far  more 
disagreeable,  at  Fort  Churchill  in  latitude  59°,  than 
at  Peel's  River  upon  the  Arctic  Circle ;  and  that 
vegetable  life  is  more  easily  nourished  at  the  latter  in 
the  Rocky  Mountains,  than  it  is  ten  degrees  farther 
south,  upon  the  shores  of  Hudson  Bay.  Upon  the 
River  Liard,  or,  "  The  River  of  the  Mountains,' 


120     EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN. 

in  latitude  60%  all  garden  produce  has  been 
grown,  and  many  kinds  of  grain,  even,  I  believe, 
wheat :  at  any  rate,  the  country  about  this  river 
is  said  to  be  quite  as  productive  and  habitable  as 
that  many  degrees  further  south  on  the  eastern 
shores  of  the  continent. 

The  part  of  the  possessions  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  which  is  habitable  and  applicable  for 
settlement,  is  the  Prairie  district — a  broad  belt 
stretching  from  Lake  Superior,  in  a  north-westerly 
direction,  to  the  Rocky  Mountains.  It  is  a  country 
of  varied  features :  immense  plains,  hills,  lakes,  and 
woods,  are  chequered  over  its  surface,  abounding 
with  every  animal  and  fish  which  contribute  to  the 
support  of  man  in  his  savage  state,  and  which, 
therefore,  render  the  advancement  of  civilized  man 
into  the  wilderness  a  matter  comparatively  neither 
of  difficulty  nor  of  expense. 

Of  the  country  between  Lake  Winnipeg  and 
Lake  Superior,  Sir  Alexander  Mackenzie  says : — 

"  There  is  not  perhaps  a  finer  country  in  the  world  for 
the  residence  of  uncivilized  man,  than  that  which  occu- 
pies the  space  between  Red  River  and  Lake  Superior : 
fish,  venison,  fowl,  and  wild  rice  are  in  great  plenty : 
the  fruits  are  strawberries,  plums,  cherries,  hazlenuts, 
gooseberries,  currants,  raspberries,  pears,"  «&:c.* 

*  Quoted  by  Mr.  M.  Martin.     British  Colonies.     Vol.  vi.,  p.  341. 


EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN.     121 

Throughout  the  whole  of  the  open  country  there 

are  large  tracts  of  land  equally  favourable  for  the 

support  of  human  life.     Some  spots,  according  to 

those  who  have  seen  them,  must  be  surpassingly 

beautiful  and  luxuriant. 

"  Near  the  portage  La  Loche  is  a  precipice  upwards 
of  one  hundred  feet  above  the  plain,  and  commanding  a 
most  extensive,  romantic,  and,  according  to  Mackenzie, 
'  a  ravishing  prospect ; '  the  eye  looks  down  on  the 
Swan  (Pelican,  or  clear  Water)  meandering  for  thirty 
miles  through  a  valley  above  three  miles  in  breadth, 
and  confined  by  two  lofty  ridges  of  equal  heights,  dis- 
playing a  most  delightful  intermixtuie  of  wood  and 
lawn,  which  stretch  out  until  the  blue  mist  obscures 
the  prospect.  Some  part  of  the  inclining  heights  are 
covered  with  stately  forests,  relieved  by  promontories  of 
the  finest  verdure,  where  the  elk  and  buffalo  enjoy  a 
delicious  pasturage.  The  Swan  runs  eighty  miles 
through  such  scenery,  when  it  discharges  into  the  Elk, 
or  Athabasca  River,  in  latitude  56°  42'  North."* 

This  was  the  language  of  Mr.  M.  Martin,  when 
he  wrote  for  truth,  not  for  party. 

There  are  none  of  the  stations  and  forts  of  the 
Company  in  this  district  where  food  cannot  be  readily 
raised,  although  the  servants  of  the  Company  fre- 
quently pay  little  attention  to  the  subject  of  farming. 

The  following,  for  example,  is  what  Dr.  King 
says  of  Cumberland  House,  one  of  the  principal 
stations  on  the  Saskatchewan  River. 
•  Id.,  p.  339. 


122     EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN. 

"  The  ground  about  Cumberland  House  is  not  only 
excellent,  but  fit  for  immediate  culture.  The  house,  a 
few  years  ago,  was  in  most  excellent  repair,  and  exhibited 
a  very  productive  farm,  the  effect  of  the  continued  care 
and  attention  of  Governor  Williams,  (the  predecessor  of 
Sir  George  Simpson,)  who  had  a  great  partiality  for 
agricultural  pursuits.  A  vast  change,  however,  had 
taken  place  at  the  time  of  our  arrival ; — the  house  was 
all  but  falling  to  pieces ;  the  implements  of  tillage,  and 
the  capacious  barns,  were  silent  monuments  of  waste  ; 
the  horses  were  becoming  wild,  and  the  oxen  occasional 
truants ;  the  cows,  although  they  went  to  the  milkpail 
twice  a  day,  gave  by  no  means  a  Virgilian  quantity  of 
that  sober  and  nutritious  beverage  ;  and  a  solitary  hog 
stood  every  chance  of  dying  without  issue."* 

Here  then  is  a  country  above  500,000  square 
miles  in  extent,  a  great  part  of  which  is  favourable 
for  settlement  and  agriculture,  and  nearly  the  whole 
of  which  is  so  well  supplied  with  game,  as  to  enable 
the  first  advancement  of  colonies  to  be  readily 
effected. 

And  not  only  is  this  vast  country  capable  of 
being  settled,  but  there  is  a  great  national  object 
to  be  gained  in  doing  so,  and  that  with  as  little 
delay  as  possible. 

The  Saskatchewan  River,  is  navigable  for  boats 
and  canoes,  almost  from  its  source  in  the  Rocky 
Mountains,  throughout  a  course   of  1,400  miles, 

*  King's  Narrative.    Vol.  i.,  p.  54. 


EFFECTS    UPON    GREAT    BRITAIN.  123 

to  the  mouth,  where  it  discharges  itself  into  Lake 
Winnipeg.  There  is,  it  appears,  but  one  rapid 
throughout  the  whole  course,  and  this  could  readily 
be  overcome. 

Along  this  magnificent  river,  then,  is  manifestly 
the  highway  to  our  possessions  on  the  shores  of  the 
Pacific  ;  and  thus  we  have  a  communication  opened 
which  no  other  part  of  the  continent  possesses.* 

With  the  exception  of  a  few  obstructions,  which 
labour  and  ingenuity  would  soon  overcome,  there  is 
water  carriage  the  whole  way  from  London  to  the 
Rocky  Moimtains ;  and  the  sources  of  the  Sas- 
katchewan on  the  one  side,  and  of  the  Columbia  on 
the  other,  are  so  close  together,  that  Sir  G.  Simpson 
could  fill  his  kettle  for  breakfast  out  of  both  at  the 
same  time.  He  says,  they  are  not  above  fourteen 
feet  apart. 

It  cannot  but  be  obvious  to  all,  that  there  is  a 
vast  object  to  be  gained,  by  opening  up  the  interior 
of  the  American  continent,  and  securing,  as  soon 
as  possible,  an  overland  communication  with  the 
Pacific  Ocean. 

It  is  worth  while  to  look  at  the  map  of  America 

•  S«e  a  pamphlet  by  Lieutenant  Millington  Henry  Synge,  Royal 
Engineers,  entitled  "Canada  in  1848.  London:  Effingham 
Wilson,  Royal  Exchange." 


124  EFFECTS    UPON    GREAT    BRITAIN. 

with  this  view.  You  will  then  see  that  the  49  th 
parallel  of  latitude,  running  straight  across  the 
continent,  from  the  Lake  of  the  Woods  to  Van- 
couver's Island,  severs  the  British  dominions  in 
North  America  from  those  of  the  United  States. 

Upon  the  shores  of  the  Pacific  Ocean,  along  the 
Columbia  River,  in  the  Wallamatte  Valley,  and, 
latterly,  further  south,  in  the  golden  district  of 
California,  an  American  population  is  springing  up 
with  a  rapidity  of  which  there  is  no  example  in 
history. 

The  attention  of  England  has  also  been  turned  to 
the  importance  of  founding  a  Colony  upon  her  own 
part  of  the  coast  of  the  Pacific  ;  and  there  can  be 
no  doubt  that,  however  for  a  few  years  the  prospects 
of  the  settlement  may  be  oppressed  by  the  super- 
incumbent weight  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
and  by  the  perverseness  of  the  Colonial  Govern- 
ment, it  must  and  will,  ere  long,  cast  off  these 
shackles,  and  enjoy  a  prosperity  derived  from  sources 
which  companies  and  Governments  cannot  control. 
Om*  new  colonies  on  the  Pacific,  will  be  separated 
from  the  mother  country  by  a  voyage  of  nearly  six 
months'  duration ;  a  voyage  in  which  it  will  be 
necessary  to  pass  along  the  seaboard  of  a  rival,  it 
may  be,  a  hostile,  power,  for  many  hundred  miles. 


EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN.     125 

It  is  quite  obvious,  that  a  colony  in  Vancouver's 
Island  is  completely  cut  off  from  the  mother  country, 
and  is,  comparatively,  entirely  at  the  mercy  of  the 
United  States. 

If  our  dominion  over  that  part  of  the  North 
American  continent,  which  we  now  call  the  Indian 
Territories,  is  to  be  maintained,  it  is  quite  evident 
that  an  inland  communication  must  be  established, 
connecting  the  Atlantic  with  the  Pacific  Ocean. 

The  complete  ignorance  in  which,  until  lately,  we 
have  been  kept  as  to  the  nature  of  the  interior  of 
the  continent,  has  favoured  the  idea  that  it  is  utterly 
chimaerical  to  indulge  the  hope  of  establishing  such 
a  communication.  But  look  at  Russia — the  inland 
route  is  maintained  across  the  enormous  continent, 
from  the  Sea  of  Ochotsk  to  the  Baltic,  without  any- 
thing approaching  to  the  facility  which  is  offered  in 
America  by  the  waters  of  the  Saskatchewan  River, 
and  its  connection  through  Lake  Winnipeg  and  the 
Lake  of  the  Woods,  with  Lake  Superior  and  the 
St.  Lawrence. 

It  is  not  possible  for  private  and  individual  enter- 
prise to  direct  the  course  of  colonization  into  those 
channels  which  will  prove  most  beneficial  to  the 
whole  empire.  That  is  peculiarly  the  task  of  the 
Government,  and  it  ought  to  be  the  most  important 


126     EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN. 

of  all  the  duties  allotted  to  the  Minister  for  the 
Colonies.  But,  in  fact,  this  is  a  task  about  which 
no  one  in  the  present  day  seems  to  care,  or  to 
trouble  themselves  at  all. 

None  seem  to  regret  the  enormous  wealth  which 
we  are  squandering  year  by  year — a  nation's  best 
wealth — strong  hands  and  stout  hearts — upon  a 
rival,  and  some  day,  perhaps,  an  hostile  power, 
whilst  tens  of  thousands  of  miles  of  coimtry,  in  the 
heart  of  our  empire,  are  lying  waste  and  desolate, 
which  it  is  of  unspeakable  importance  to  occupy  and 
to  cultivate. 

If  England  will  ever  see  this  great  truth,  and  will 
enforce  upon  the  Government  ihe  task  of  directing 
the  stream  of  colonization  which  must  go  on,  directed 
or  not,  as  long  as  the  population  continues  to  in- 
crease faster  than  its  means  of  subsistence  ; — and  if 
the  Government  does  ever  undertake  to  guide  the 
energies  of  those  who  leave  our  shores  into  such 
channels  as  shall  produce  the  most  beneficial  reaction 
upon  the  mother  country,  and  the  most  salutary 
influence  upon  the  stability  of  the  whole  empire ;  it 
is  impossible  but  that  this  task,  of  opening  up  the 
overland  communication  between  the  Canadas  and 
the  Pacific  Ocean,  should  be  one  of  the  first  to 
demand  attention. 


EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN,     127 

To  establish  first,  posts,  and  then  villages,  along  the 
course  of  the  Saskatchewan  River ; — to  overcome  the 
only  difficulty  which  exists  in  the  navigation  from  Lake 
Winnipeg,  viz.,  the  falls  near  Cumberland  House ; — 
to  create  steam  communication  along  its  waters ; — 
to  open  the  coal  mines  on  its  banks,  which  would  at 
once  render  the  steam  navigation  a  matter  of  ready 
attainment — these  are  tasks  which,  were  there  any 
real  belief  in  the  vast  importance  of  the  object  to  be 
gained,  and  any  real  will  on  the  part  of  the  nation 
and  the  Government  to  accomplish  it,  would  neither 
occupy  a  long  time,  nor  demand  any  national  outlay 
which  would  not  be  amply  repaid. 

And  what  are  the  objects  to  be  gained  by  this 
great  national  undertaking  ? 

First.  We  should  provide  a  new  outlet  for  a 
population  sinking  in  misery,  discontent,  and  famine, 
in  England,  Scotland,  and  Ireland.  Next,  labom*, 
which  at  home  is  lying  idle  and  unproductive,  would 
be  employed  in  calling  into  existence  that  wealth, 
mineral,  or  agricultiu*al,  which  the  earth  ever  gene- 
rously yields  to  those  who  ask  it  at  her  hands. 
Again,  we  should  be  establishing  a  chain  of  defen- 
sible posts  along  a  frontier  line  of  a  thousand  miles  ; 
and,  above  all,  we  should  be  extending  over  half  a 
continent,  that  religion,  that  civilization,  those  laws, 
and  those  liberties,  which  we  love  and  reverence. 


128  EFFECTS    UPON    GREAT    BRITAIN. 

and  in  which  we  firmly  and  faithftJly  believe. 
Nor  is  it  to  be  forgotten  that  we  should  be  fulfilling 
one  great  task  which  we  have  been  given  to  do,  in 
calling  back  from  their  barbarism  and  paganism, 
the  wandering  children  of  the  soil.  And,  in  effect- 
ing all  this,  we  should,  at  the  same  time,  be  esta- 
blishing a  line  of  communication,  a  highway  for 
letters,  for  traffic,  and  for  travellers,  straight  across, 
from  ocean  to  ocean.  This  is  the  only  way  in  which 
our  power  in  the  American  continent  can  be  con- 
solidated :  this  is  the  only  consideration  which 
renders  it  worth  the  while  of  Great  Britain's  under- 
taking the  foundation  of  a  colony  on  the  remote 
shores  of  Vancouver's  Island  ;  for  the  only  light 
in  which  a  colony  on  the  Pacific  is  desirable  for  this 
country,  is  when  viewed  as  the  terminus  of  the  great 
overland  route  from  the  Atlantic  to  the  Pacific 
Ocean. 

Now  if  this  be  the  policy  which  ought  to  guide 
our  proceedings  in  North  America,  what  have  we  to 
thank  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  for  ?  or  in  what 
manner  have  they  advanced,  or  is  it  likely  that  they 
will  advance,  the  interests  of  the  British  empire  ? 

The  results  of  their  influence  in  the  definition  of 
the  boundary  line,  has  already  been  noticed.  Shall 
we  now  trust  them  to  guard  it  ? 

The  whole  character  and  conduct  of  the  Hudson's 


EFFECTS   UPON    GREAT   BRITAIN.  129 

Bay  Company  has  always  been,  and  always  must  be, 
hostile  to  this  which  we  here  lay  down  as  the  in- 
terests of  Great  Britain  in  North  America.  Their 
profits,  their  very  existence  as  a  Company,  depend 
on  keeping  the  whole  of  the  territory  under  their 
rule,  a  vast  himting-ground — an  enormous  preserve 
— upon  keeping  whole  nations  of  Indians  as  hunters 
and  trappers,  and  discouraging  anything  like 
agricultiu"al  settlement;  above  all,  upon  keeping 
the  territory  shut  up,  preventing  its  ever  becoming 
a  highway,  sticking  up  a  great  "  no- thoroughfare 
board"  at  every  entrance,  and  thus  avoiding  the 
risk  of  any  competition  in  the  fur  traffic.  But  the 
time  is  fast  approaching  when  this  country  will  have 
to  decide,  whether  the  profits  of  239  merchants  shall 
be  deemed  of  more  importance  than  the  law  which 
they  violate,  than  the  progress  of  civilization  which 
they  impede.  Than  the  emancipation  of  the  native 
tribes  whom  they  enslave,  than  the  interests  of  the 
British  Empire  which  they  betray. 

In  reference  to  the  benefits  which  England  gains 
from  the  existence  of  the  Company,  it  is  necessary 
to  add  a  very  few  words  as  to  the  extent  of  the 
traific  in  which  it  is  engaged.  We  shall  then  see 
what  the  Charter  has  done  in  the  way  of  extending 
the  trade  of  this  country. 

K 


130     EFFECTS  UPON- GREAT  BRITAIN. 

It  appears  that  the  original  capital  subscribed  was 
£10,500  ;  and  that,  in  consequence  of  the  enormous 
profits  realized,  the  Company  trebled  their  stock  in 
1690  ;  that  is,  they  passed  a  vote  by  which  the  stock 
of  the  Company  was  declared  to  be  £31,500  ;  and 
the  object  seems  to  have  been,  that  the  dividends 
might  appear  to  be  smaller  upon  a  larger  nominal 
capital,  than  upon  the  original  subscribed  capital  of 
£10,500. 

Continued  prosperity  enabled  the  Company  to 
perform  a  similar  trick  in  1720.  In  this  year  the 
capital  was  declared  to  be  again  trebled,  and  to 
amount  to  £94,500.  It  was  then  proposed  to  add 
three  times  as  much  to  it  by  subscription,  but  in  this 
way,  that  each  proprietor  subscribing  £100  should 
receive  £300  of  stock  ;  so  that  the  nominal  stock 
should  amount  to  £378,000,  the  real  additional 
sum  subscribed  being  £94,500. 

This  plan  was  frustrated  by  the  difficulty,  at  the 
time,  of  procuring  money,  and  only  £3,150  was 
subscribed.  Nevertheless,  the  whole  capital  of  the 
Company  was  ordered  to  reckoned  at  £103,500, 
whilst  the  only  subscribed  capital  was  £13,650. 

AVhen  the  rival  companies,  the  North- West 
Company  of  Montreal  and  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany, imited  in  the  year  1821,  the  latter  made  a 


EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN.     131 

call  of  £100  per  share  on  their  Proprietors,  which 
raised  their  capital  to  £200,000,  and  a  similar  sum 
being  added  by  the  North- West  Company,  the 
whole  stock  of  trade  of  the  present  Company  amounts, 
or  is  said  to  amount,  to  £400,000. 

This  is  the  measure  of  the  whole  traffic  carried 
on  with  half  the  continent  of  North  America  by  this 
country. 

It  is  not,  of  course,  possible  to  say  what  amount 
of  capital  might  be  profitably  employed  ;  but  when 
we  are  told  of  great  national  mercantile  benefit 
being  derived  by  this  country,  it  is  necessary  that  the 
public  should  know  that  the  entire  capital  engaged 
is  £400,000,  and  no  more  ;  and  even  of  this,  a 
considerable  portion  is  nominal,  that  is,  was  never 
paid  up  at  all. 

We  may  form  some  opinion  of  the  effect  of  the 
monopoly  of  the  trade,  compared  with  what  might 
be  the  case  were  there  a  competition,  by  the  fact 
that  the  number  of  white  servants  in  the  pay  of  the 
Company  is  about  a  thousand.  'Whereas  the  North- 
West  Company  of  Montreal  alone,  with  only  half 
the  capital,  and  in  competition  with  the  Chartered 
Company,  employed  two  thousand. 

Again,  the  number  of  ships  sent  to  the  Hudson 
Bay  is  two  annually.      All  the  exports  and  imports 

K  2 


132  EFFECTS    UPON    GREAT    BRITAIN. 

from  the  whole  country  east  of  the  Rocky  Moun- 
tains are  contained  in  about  two  ships  of  about 
three  hundred  tons  each  :  and  two  ships  more  are 
employed  on  the  north-west  coast.  AVhereas  the 
North-West  Company,  as  long  ago  as  1816,  char- 
tered three  ships  for  carrying  on  a  trade  on  the 
north-west  coast,  and  for  trading  in  furs  to  China : 
and  the  same  Company,  at  that  time,  employed 
upwards  of  tlu-ee  hundred  Canadians  between  the 
Rocky  Mountains  and  the  sea. 

To  say,  then,  that  the  trade  of  this  coimtry  has 
been  fostered  or  extended  by  the  monopoly  enjoyed 
by  the  Company,  is  exactly  contrary  to  the  truth. 

The  settlements  of  the  Moravians  on  the  coast  of 
Labrador  alone,  employ  one  ship  annually  ;  that  is  to 
say,  create  about  half  as  much  trade  with  England 
as  is  derived  from  the  whole  of  the  Company's 
dominions  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains. 

Again,  if  we  look  at  the  extent  of  the  country  in 
which  the  Russian  Fur  Company  carries  on  its 
operations,  and  compare  it  with  the  territories  of 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  and  then  learn  that  the 
former  employ  twelve  armed  vessels,  whilst'  the 
whole  traffic  of  the  English  from  all  parts  of  the 
continent  occupies  hvXfour,  we  shall  be  astonished, 
if  not  at  the  fact,  at  any  rate  at  the  assertion  in  spite 


EFFECTS  UPON  GREAT  BRITAIN.     133 

of  it,  that  the  English  have  placed  the  Fur  Trade 
of  their  enormoiis  territories  under  a  system  which  is 
favourable  to  the  development  of  the  commercial 
resources  of  the  coimtry. 

In  fine,  then,  in  whatever  light  the  character  of 
the  Company  be  regarded,  whether  as  having  per- 
formed the  duties  of  the  station  assigned  to  it,  to  lead 
the  enterprise  of  the  nation  in  geographical  discovery 
and  science ;  or,  as  extending  the  influence  of  British 
laws,  liberties,  and  civilization,  and  preparing  the 
way  for  the  advancement  of  the  race,  and  increasing 
the  stability  of  the  empire  ;  or,  finally,  even  in  its 
own  narrow  and  peculiar  sphere,  as  enlarging  the 
fields  for  commercial  enterprise ; — ^in  whatever  light 
this  Company  be  regarded,  it  is  impossible  not  to 
arrive  at  the  conclusion,  that  it  has  ever  been  hostile 
to  the  best  uiterests,  and  has  shackled  the  energies, 
of  Great  Britain.  It  is  impossible  not  to  view  it  as 
an  obstructive  impediment,  which  the  advancing 
requirements  of  the  age  must,  sooner  or  later,  sweep 
from  its  path. 


CHAPTER  VII. 


THE  RESULTS  OF  THE  HUDSON  S  BAY  COMPANY  S 
CHARTER  IN  ITS  EFFECTS  ON  THE  NATIVE 
INDIAN  POPULATION  OF  THE  COMPANY'S 
TERRITORIES. 

The  evil  influence  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
upon  the  mother  country,  has  resulted  more  from 
crimes  of  omission,  than  from  those  of  commission  ; 
and  amidst  the  vast  and  various  sources  of  our 
national  wealth,  and  the  manifold  directions  in 
which  it  is  employed,  it  is  scarcely  to  he  wondered 
at  that  the  comparatively  insignificant  commercial 
operations  of  the  Company  should  have  escaped  much 
public  notice  ;  nor  is  it  more  surprising  that,  invested 
with  such  powers,  and  in  the  possession  of  such 
admirable  machinery  for  veiling  their  transactions, 
as  well  as  the  country  in  which  they  are  carried  on, 
in  impenetrable  secrecy,  the  interests  of  merchants 
and  adventurers  should  have  been  but  little  attracted 
to  those  fields  for  enterprise,  from  which  the  Hud- 
son's Bay  Company  exclude  all  others,  and  which, 
nevertheless,  they  only  very  partially  occupy  them- 
selves. 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       135 

But  it  is  far  otherwise  with  the  subject  to  which 
we  have  now  to  turn — the  influence  of  the  Com- 
pany's power  and  privileges  upon  the  Indian 
population. 

To  the  native  Indian,  the  Company  is  all  in  all. 
It  is  his  master — his  lord — his  "  great  medicine." 

The  results  of  the  Charter  which  we  have  now  to 
contemplate,  are  fatal  and  universal ;  extending  over 
a  country  upwards  of  four  millions  of  square  miles 
in  extent,  inhabited  by  fifty  nations  of  human 
beings. 

If  that  these  human  beings  are  imcivilised  and 
poor — in  fine,  only  savages — be  a  reason  why  their 
sufferings  should  be  unheeded,  and  their  interests 
despised  by  the  Company ;  there  are  those,  at  any 
rate,  by  whom  this  will  be  deemed  only  a  more 
irresistible  claim  for  sympathy  and  protection. 

Far  from  the  least  important  result,  therefore,  of 
the  dominion  of  the  Company,  to  which  we  shall 
call  attention,  is  the  effect  which  it  has  upon  the 
native  population  of  North  America  ;  on  behalf  of 
whom,  we  protest  against  the  frightful  despotism  to 
which  England  has  unintentionally  consigned  them. 

It  is  but  a  small  part  of  the  truth  to  say  that  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  enjoy  a  right  of  exclusive 
trade  with  the  Indian  population.     This  right  of 


136      EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

exclusive  trade  is,  practically  and  positively,  a  right 
of  exclusive  property  in  the  labour,  life,  and  des- 
tinies of  the  Indian  race.  It  is  an  absolute  and 
unqualified  dominion  over  their  bodies  and  their 
souls — a  dominion  irresponsible  to  any  legal  autho- 
rity— a  despotism,  whose  severity  no  legislative 
control  can  mitigate,  and  no  public  opinion  restrain. 
It  knows  but  one  limit,  and  obeys  but  one  law, — 
"  Put  money  in  thy  purse."  "  God  knows,"  said 
the  Rev.  Mr.  Beaver,  the  Company's  own  Chaplain 
at  the  Columbia  River,  "  God  knows  that  I  speak 
the  conviction  of  my  mind  ;  and  may  he  forgive  me 
if  I  speak  imadvisedly,  when  I  state  my  belief,  that 
the  life  of  an  Indian  was  never  yet  by  a  trapper  put 
in  competition  with  a  beaver  skin." 

A  trading  port  is  established  in  the  heart  of  a 
tribe  of  Indians,  who  enjoy  a  savage  independence, 
and  draw  from  the  woods  and  waters,  by  such  rude 
implements  as  their  untaught  ingenuity  can  supply, 
a  subsistence  suited  to  their  primitive  condition  and 
simple  wants.  The  skins  of  the  beaver  and  silver 
fox  are  not  much  in  request,  except  as  a  chance 
article  of  clothing.  But  beaver  skins,  though  un- 
appreciated in  the  Indian  camp,  are  valuable  in 
the  London  market ;  and  the  Indians  are  not  long 
in  perceiving  that  hunting  the  buffalo,  spearing  fish. 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       137 

and  planting  patches  of  maize,  are  pursuits  less 
honourable  in  the  eyes  of  the  new  comers,  and  less 
adapted  to  obtain  the  kind  of  wealth  which  the 
strangers  import,  than  ti*apping  otters,  martins,  and 
musquash  ;  which,  if  \hey  do  not  supply  food  to  the 
trapper,  supply  something  more  valuable  to  the 
trader.  Time  passes  on,  and  the  primitive  bow 
and  arrow,  the  bone-pointed  spear,  and  snares  of 
the  sinews  of  the  deer,  are  laid  aside  for  more 
effective  instruments  of  destruction — guns,  steel 
traps,  and  scalping  knives.  And  the  ancient  wea- 
pons of  the  chase,  in  the  skilful  use  of  which 
the'  Indians  of  old  lived  and  midtiplied  upon  the 
earth,  are  entirely  forgotten,  and  exchanged  for 
others,  supplied  by  the  strangers  who  have  ap- 
peared amongst  them,  and  who  thus  hold  in  their 
hands  the  thread  of  life  of  the  whole  Indian  race. 

The  stroke  of  a  pen,  ordering  the  supply  of  am- 
munition to  be  stopped,  can  sweep  a  score  of 
families  from  the  face  of  the  earth. 

The  original  tribe,  formidable  in  their  collective 
nimibers  and  strength,  and  therefore  less  manageable 
and  subservient,  is  broken  up,  and  dispersed  in  single 
families  over  hundreds  of  miles  of  waste  forests, 
where  each  has  the  exclusive  property  of  all  the 
beavers,  wild  cats,  wolves,  and  grizzly  bears,  &c., 


138      EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

that  may  infest  its  particular  hunting-ground,  or 
"  preserve." 

The  hunter,  no  longer  attired  in  his  comfortable 
primitive  dress  of  leather  or  furs,  shivers  and  starves 
under  a  civilised  slop  coat  or  shirt,  decked  out, 
with  a  profusion  of  lace,  glass  beads,  gewgaws,  and 
trinkets,  all  of  which  are  purchased  at  the  moderate 
rate  of  two  thousand  per  cent,  on  their  cost  in 
London. 

To  complete  the  absolute  and  entire  dependence  of 
the  Indian  on  the  Company,  he  is  invariably  kept 
in  debt;  of  the  obligation  of  which,  it  is  said,  no 
human  being  is  more  sensible. 

In  the  course  of  time,  imder  a  systematic  and 
constant  persecution,  the  larger  animals  which 
supply  the  food  of  the  natives,  and  even  those  which 
yield  the  valuable  furs  for  the  London  market, 
decrease  in  numbers,  and  become  nearly  or  wholly 
exterminated. 

The  district,  no  longer  valuable  to  the  Company, 
must  be  abandoned  ;  their  trading  fort  is  removed 
to  a  distant  part  of  the  country ;  the  supply  of 
powder,  by  which  alone  the  natives  can  now  ensure 
a  subsistence,  is  stopped ;  and  famine  and  cannibalism 
sweep  off  the  wretched  remnant  of  the  native  tribe. 

The  fate  which  sometimes  engulfs  an  entire  sec- 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       139 

tion  of  the  human  family,  is,  however,  daily  operating 
upon  individuals. 

This  is  a  doom  which  negro  slavery  has  not  re- 
corded amongst  its  horrors.  For  the  superannuated 
negro,  when  his  period  of  toil  is  over,  some  oc- 
cupation could  be  found,  suited  to  his  age  and 
infirmities,  which  entitled  him  to  the  supply  of  the 
necessaries  of  his  waning  life ;  but  the  aged  and 
disabled  Indian,  too  haughty  to  beg,  were  it  not 
indeed  hopeless  to  obtain,  the  annual  pittance  of 
ammimition  which  might  save  his  life,  but  which 
his  failing  energies  can  no  longer  earn,  is  driven  to 
the  woods,  to  seek  a  lingering  death  by  famine, 
with  all  the  honour  and  dignity  of  British  liberty. 

An  apparently  formidable  array  of  evidence  has 
been  laid  before  the  public,  to  demonstrate  that  the 
native  Indians  are  improving  under  the  manage- 
ment of  the  Company ;  and,  in  particular,  much 
stress  has  been  laid  upon  the  evidence  of  the  Bishop 
of  Montreal,  a  prelate  whose  testimony  must  ever 
be  entitled  to  profound  respect.  But  it  has  already 
been  said  that  the  Bishop  of  Montreal  was  never 
further  in  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  territories 
than  the  Red  River  settlement ;  that  is  to  say,  only 
on  their  outskirts.  Of  what  was  the  condition  of 
the  Indian  tribes  throughout  the  enormous  extent  of 


140       EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

the  Indian  territories,  the  Bishop  did  know,  and 
professed  to  know,  literally  nothing,  except  what 
he  heard  from  the  officers  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company. 

*  Of  the  delightful  scenes  which  his  Lordship 
witnessed  and  described  at  the  Red  River,  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  are  in  no  sense  the  authors. 
Those  results  are  to  be  attributed  to  the  labour  and 
zeal  of  the  clergy,  who  are  supported  for  the  most 
part  by  the  Church  Missionary  Society,  and  to 
whom  the  Company,  considering  how  much  they 
obtain  from  the  country  and  the  natives,  have  af- 
forded disgracefully  little  assistance  and  support. 

That  the  inhabitants  of  the  Red  River  settlement 
are  little  indebted  to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
for  the  benefit  of  education,  is  proved  by  one 
sentence  in  Sir  George  Simpson's  Voyage  round  the 
World  ;  in  which  he  says,  "  As  to  the  charges  of 
education,  four-fifths  of  them  fall  on  the  pious  and 
charitable  association  just  mentioned,  (the  Church 
Missionary  Society,)  while  the  remaining  fifth  is 
borne  by  such  individual  parents  as  are  able  and 
willing  to  spare  fifteen  shillings  a  year  for  the  moral 
and  intellectual  culture  of  a  child."  * 

*  Sir  G.  Simpson's  Overland  Journey  round  the  World. 
Vol.  i.,  p.  54. 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       141 

The  impression  left  on  the  mind  by  the  perusal  of 
the  Bishop  of  Montreal's  accoimt  of  the  Red  River 
settlement,  so  far  from  being  one  of  pleasure  and 
surprise  that  so  much  has  been  done  for  the  educa- 
tion and  civilization  of  the  Indian  population,  is 
one  of  shame  and  sorrow  ;  for  it  is  impossible  not  to 
ask,  what,  with  such  facilities  for  humanising  and 
instructing  the  savage,  as  are  evidently  afforded  by 
his  own  abilities  and  disposition — what  might  not 
his  race  now  be,  had  the  Company  acted  in  other 
parts  of  their  territories  as  they  have  been  compelled 
to  act  in  the  Red  River  ? 

The  only  Indians  which  the  Bishop  of  Montreal 
saw  were  in  the  best  part  of  the  Company's  terri- 
tories ;  in  a  part  where  it  is  natural  to  suppose  that 
they  would  be  in  a  better  condition  than  anywhere 
else, — on  the  route  between  the  Red  River  settle- 
ment and  Canada.  And  what  does  the  good  Bishop 
say  of  these  Indians  ? 

"  Nothing  can  be  more  pitiable,  in  my  estimation, 
than  the  condition  of  these  poor  heathens  :  nothing  more 
calculated  to  excite  an  interest  in  favour  of  all  rightly- 
conducted  efforts  for  their  conversion.  They  are  some- 
times regarded  with  a  sort  of  admiration,  as  the  unso- 
phisticated children  of  nature;  and,  still  more,  as 
exhibiting  the  very  impersonation  of  a  high-toned  in- 
dependence,  and   an   unshackled    manliness  of  spirit. 


142       EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

Children  of  nature  they  are :  and  what  kind  of  moral 
nurse  is  mother  nature,  a  Christian  has  no  need  to  ask. 
They  are,  physically,  a  fine  race  of  men ;  and  they  are 
perfectly  susceptible  of  moral,  and  intellectual,  and 
spiritual  culture  ;  but  their  actual  condition  presents  a 
most  degrading  picture  of  humanity.  Some  of  them 
came  up  to  us  in  dirty  blankets,  or  dirtier  dresses  of 
worn  and  tattered  hare-skins :  others  were  totally  naked, 
except  the  waist-cloth ;  their  heads,  with  scarcely  an 
exception,  protected  only  by  an  enormous  mass  of  long 
black  hair.  Others,  in  the  encampments,  who  appeared 
to  be  persons  of  some  distinction,  and  whose  attire  was 
in  better  order,  were  tricked  out  more  like  Bedlamites 
than  rational  beings ;  a  silly  and  undiscriminating  passion 
for  ornament  prompting  them  to  turn  to  this  account 
whatever  frippery  they  can  become  possessed  of;  so  that 
the  thimbles,  for  example,  which  they  procure  from  the 
Company,  are  seen  dangling  at  the  end  of  long  thin 
braids  of  hair  which  hung  from  the  men's  foreheads  : 
some  have  feathers  stuck  into  their  hair,  and  these, 
perhaps,  bent  into  an  imitation  of  horns ;  with  others 
appended  to  resemble  the  ears  of  an  animal.  Many 
have  their  faces  painted,  all  the  lower  part  of  the  visage 
being  made  perfectly  black,  and  the  eyes  encircled  with 
bright  vermilion  ;  but  it  would  be  impossible  to  describe 
the  varieties  of  their  costume,  or  their  fantastic  decora- 
tions :  and  there  they  sit,  or  rather  squat,  smoking  and 
basking  in  the  sun  the  live-long  day,  sunk  in  an  indo- 
lence from  which  nothing  seems  to  rouse  them,  but  the 
excitement  of  war  or  of  the  chase."* 

Another  authority,  upon  which  great  reliance  has 
been  placed, — an  authority,  certainly,  of  importance, 

*  The  Bishop  of  Montrears  Journal  of  a  Visit  to  the  Red  River 
Settlement,  pp.  34-6.   Hatchard.    London.     1845. 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       143 

because  of  the  difBculty  of  obtaining  any  evidence 
independent  of  the  Company,  is  the  Report  of  the 
Aborigines  Committee  in  1837.  The  public  may 
judge  for  themselves  how  far  it  is  true,  as  has  been 
asserted,  that  this  Report  is  favourable  to  the  cha- 
racter of  the  Company.  The  only  part  of  the  Re- 
port which  treats  of  the  natives  in  "  The  Indian 
Territories,"  is  as  follows : — 

"  Of  the  ulterior  tribes,  [those  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company's  territories,]  the  account  given  by  Mr.  King, 
who  accompanied  Captain  Back  in  his  late  Arctic  ex- 
pedition, is  deplorable  :  he  gives  it  as  his  opinion,  that 
the  northern  Indians  have  decreased  greatly,  and  '  de- 
cidedly from  contact  with  the  Europeans.' 

"  Thus  the  Cree  Indians,  once  a  powerful  tribe, '  have 
now  degenerated  into  a  few  families,  congregated  about 
the  European  establishments ;  while  some  few  still  retain 
their  ancient  rights,  and  have  become  partly  allies  of  a 
tribe  of  Indians  that  were  once  their  slaves.'  He  sup- 
poses their  numbers  to  have  been  reduced,  within  thirty 
or  forty  years,  from  eight  thousand  or  ten  thousand  to 
two  hundred,  or,  at  most,  three  hundred  ;  and  has  no 
doubt  of  the  remnant  being  extirpated  in  a  short  time, 
if  no  measures  are  taken  to  improve  their  morals  and  to 
cultivate  habits  of  civilization.  It  should  be  observed 
that  this  tribe  had  access  to  posts  not  comprehended 
within  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  prohibition,  as  to 
the  introduction  of  spirituous  liquors,  and  that  they  miser- 
ably show  the  effects  of  the  privilege. 

"  The  Copper  Indians  also,  through  ill-management, 
intemperance,  and  vice,  are  said  to  have  decreased, 
within  the  last  five  years,  to  one-half  the  number  of 
what  they  were. 


144      EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

"  The  early  quarrels  between  the  Hudson's  Bay  and 
the  North- West  Companies,  in  which  the  Indians  were 
induced  to  take  a  bloody  part,  furnished  them  with  a 
ruinous  example  of  the  savageness  of  Christians.  Mr. 
Pelly,  the  chairman  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  has, 
however,  assured  your  Committee,  that  many  of  the 
evils  caused  by  the  rivalry  of  the  two  Companies,  have 
been  removed  by  their  junction,  and  that  the  present 
Directors  are  well  disposed  to  promote  the  welfare  of 
the  Indians :  yet  we  observe,  that  the  witness  above 
quoted,  Mr.  King,  who  has  travelled  in  the  country,  is 
of  opinion,  that  even  our  system  of  peaceable  trade  has 
a  tendency  to  become  injurious  to  these  people,  by  en- 
couraging them  in  improvident  habits,  which  frequently 
bring  large  parties  of  them  to  utter  destitution,  and  to 
death  by  starvation." 

How  far  the  information  supplied  to  the  Com- 
mittee was  correct,  as  to  the  supply  of  spirits  to  the 
Cree  Indians  from  other  than  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company,  is  a  matter  of  great  doubt. 

But  that  there  was  little  need  for  such  an  expla- 
nation, is  evident  from  the  following  sentence,  in 
which  intemperance  is  recorded  as  a  cause  of  the 
destruction  of  the  Copper  Indians,  who  are  far  beyond 
the  reach  of  any  traders,  except  those  of  the  Company. 

In  the  course  of  this  chapter,  it  will  be  sufficiently 
evident  that  the  condition  of  the  Indians  is  not  that 
which  has  been  represented  by  the  Company.  It 
will  appear  that  they  are  in  a  condition  of  the 
extremest  misery  ;  and  that  instead  of  increasing  in 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       145 

numbers,  as  has  been  asserted,  they  are  rapidly 
decreasing  over  the  entire  continent  of  British  North 
America.  But  it  is  not  enough  merely  to  shew 
that  these  things  are  so :  it  is  necessary  that  we 
should  trace  tliese  effects  to  their  causes,  and  demon- 
strate that  the  system  adopted  by  the  Company  is 
the  main  cause  of  all  the  evils  inflicted  on  the 
wretched  inhabitants.  And  it  is  the  more  necessary 
to  do  this,  because  a  sympathy  for  the  Indian  races 
has  been  obtruded  on  the  public  by  the  Company  as 
one  of  the  chief  characteristics  of  their  proceedings. 

The  first  matter  that  will  engage  our  attention  is, 
the  system  of  traflic  carried  on  with  the  natives ;  and 
it  will  be  proved  that  the  remuneration  given  to  the 
Indian  for  hunting  and  trapping  the  fur-bearing 
animals,  bears  no  proportion  to  the  value  of  the  fm*, 
i.  e.j  to  the  profits  of  the  Company,  and  that  it  is  only 
a  very  small  part  of  what  the  Indian  would  receive  were 
the  country  open  to  the  competition  of  rival  traders. 

The  Hudson's  Bay  Company  pay  the  Indian  the 
least  possible  amount  which  will  enable  them  fo 
obtain  the  skins. 

It  has  been  asserted,  with  a  view  to  throwing  dis- 
credit on  the  above  assertion,  that  the  Company  are 
by  no  means  in  the  enjoyment  of  extravagant  profits. 

It  is  possible  that  the  profits  of  the  present  Share- 


146     EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

holders  may  not  be  enormous :  it  is  possible  that 
they  may  have  bought  stock  at  such  an  increased 
value,  that  it  is  necessary,  in  order  that  they  may 
be  paid  a  reasonable  dividend,  to  procure  a  certain 
supply  of  skins  from  the  country  at  less  than  a 
certain  cost ;  but  that  cost  may  be,  at  the  same 
time,  far  less  than  the  value  which  the  furs  would 
bear  in  their  own  country,  supposing  a  monopoly 
of  the  trade  did  not  exist. 

It  is  quite  possible,  nay  extremely  probable,  that 
the  price  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  Stock  is 
a  great  deal  higher  than  it  would  be  in  case  there 
were  no  exclusive  trade  ;  but  the  injury  to  the 
Indian  is  not  one  bit  the  less  on  this  account.  Is  it 
fair  and  honourable  trade,  or  is  it  a  shame  and 
disgrace  to  British  merchants  that  the  Indian  be 
robbed  of  the  fair  value  of  his  labour,  (and  robbed 
he  is,  if  he  would  get  more  under  a  competition  in 
trade,  than  under  the  present  system,)  in  order  that 
a  sufficient  dividend  may  be  paid  on  the  present 
price  of  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  Stock  ?  When 
we  shew  that  the  Indian  is  receiving  only  a  fraction 
of  what  he  ought  to  receive  for  his  furs,  it  is  enough 
to  reply,  "  We  can't  afford  to  pay  him  more,  other- 
wise we  could  not  pay  our  own  Shareholders  ten 
per  cent.,  because  they  bought  Stock  at  such  a  high 
price  ?" 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    147 

That  the  Indian  does  receive  only  a  small  part 
of  the  price  which  he  would,  under  a  system  of 
open  trade,  obtain,  is  manifest  from  the  following 
extracts.  These  extracts  will  shew,  at  the  same 
time,  the  whole  character  of  the  Company's  traffic 
with  the  Indians ;  and  they  have  been  arranged 
nearly  in  the  order  of  date,  for  the  purpose  of 
proving  that  the  result  of  this  monopoly  of  the  trade 
has  been  the  same  from  the  first  history  of  the 
Company. 

The  following  is  quoted  by  Lieutenant  Chappell, 

as  shewing  the  state  of  the  trade  in  the  middle  of 

the  last  century  : — 

"  "When  the  Indians  came  to  the  Factory,  in  June 
1742,  they  could  get  but  a  pound  of  gunpowder  for  four 
beaver  skins,  a  pound  of  shot  for  one  beaver,  an  ell  of 
coarse  cloth  for  fifteen,  a  blanket  for  twelve,  tivo  fish' 
hooks  or  three  Jiints  for  one,  a  gun  for  twenty -five  skins, 
a  pistol  for  ten,  a  hat  with  a  M'hite  lace  for  seven,  an 
a\e  for  four,  a  checked  shirt  for  seven,  a  hedging-bill 
for  One,  a  gallon  of  brandy  for  four ;  all  which  was  sold 
at  the  monstrous  profit  of  2,000  per  cent."* 

In  the  appendix  to  Mr.  Robson's  work,  we  read 
the  following : — 

"By  the  standard  of  their  trade,"  [in  Paper No.^ix. 
laid  before  the  Parliamentary  Committee  of  Inquiry 
into  the  Conduct  and  Administration  of  the  Hudson's 

*  Lieutenant  Chappell's  Voyage  to  Hudson's  Bay,  &c.  London. 
1817.     P.  231. 

l2 


148    EFFECTS   ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

Bay  Company  in  the  year  1742,]  "  we  may  see  how  vast  a 
price  is  charged  to  the  natives  upon  the  goods  given 
them  in  exchange  for  their  furs,  which  are  all  valued  by 
the  beaver  skin  as  the  standard.  Thus,  for  a  quart  of 
English  spirits,  which  the  Company  export  at  sixpence, 
and  before  they  sell  it  to  the  natives  mix  it  with  one- 
third  water,  which  reduces  it  to  fourpence,  they  take  a 
beaver  skin,  which  has  been  sold  at  the  Company's  sale, 
at  a  medium  of  ten  years,  for  six  shillings  three  far- 
things the  pound  weight,  and  a  beaver  skin  generally 
weighs  a  pound  and  a  half,  so  that  they  get  nine  shil- 
lings and  a  penny  for  fourpence,  which  is  £2,700  per 
cent,  profit.  Upon  other  articles  not  so  material,  they 
do  not  gain  above  £500  or  £600  per  cent. :  but  in 
exchange  for  martens,  the  profit  is  double  of  that  upon 
beavers,  for  they  value  three  martens  only  as  one 
beaver,  and  those  at  a  medium  of  ten  years  have  sold 
for  six  shillings  a  skin.  It  appears  also  from  the  stan- 
dard, that  one-third  more  is  charged  upon  many  articles 
at  Nelson  and  Churchill  Factories,  than  at  Moose  and 
Albany ;  and  not  content  even  with  this  extravagant 
profit,  the  factors  are  allowed  to  sell  their  goods  con- 
siderably above  the  standard,  which  is  called  the  profit 
upon  the  overplus  trade."* 

"  In  a  table  given  by  Umfraville,  [in  1790,]  we  find 
the  following  equivalents  for  a  beaver  skin : — half  a 
pound  of  glass  beads,  one  pound  of  powder,  one  comb, 
one  small  burning-glass,  twelve  needles,  one  file,  one 
ice-chisel,  and  one  quart  of  brandy.  Now,  taking  the 
last  as  an  instance,  one  quart  of  brandy  of  the  usual 
strength  was  worth  one  beaver  skin  ;  but  by  being  half 
water,  the  price  is  made  two.  Now  for  spirits  the  Com- 
pany pay  at  the  rate  of  twenty  shillings  a  gallon :  this  pro- 
duces eight  beaver  skins  weighing  about  ten  pounds,  which 

*  Robs()n"s  Six  Years'  Residence  in  Hudson's  Bay.  London. 
1752.     App.,  p.  50. 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    149 

at  the  medium  of  exchange,  supposing  it  to  be  twelve 
shillings  per  pound,  amounts  to  £6  sterling  :  if  the 
brandy  were  traded  for  other  skins,  the  return  would  be 
about  £8.  This  calculation  is  considerably  below  the 
present  prices.  A  fourpenny  comb,  says  that  writer, 
will  barter  for  a  bear's  skin  worth  £2."* 

Coming  down  to  a  later  period,  we  have  the 
testimony  of  Sir  John  Richardson,  as  follows  ; — 

"  The  standard  of  exchange  in  all  mercantile  trans- 
actions with  the  natives  is  a  beaver  skin,  the  relative 
value  of  which,  as  originally  established  by  the  traders, 
differs  considerably  from  the  present  worth  of  the  article 
it  represents ;  but  the  Indians  are  averse  to  change. 
Three  martens,  eight  musk  rats,  or  a  single  lynx,  or 
wolverine  skin,  are  equivalent  to  one  beaver  ;  a  silver 
fox,  white  fox,  or  otter,  are  reckoned  two  beavers ;  and 
a  black  fox,  or  large  black  bear,  is  equal  to  four:  a 
mode  of  reckoning,  which  has  very  little  connexion 
with  the  real  value  of  those  different  furs  in  the  Euro- 
pean market.  Neither  has  any  attention  been  paid  to  the 
original  cost  of  European  articles  in  fixing  the  tariff  by 
which  they  are  sold  to  the  Indians,  A  coarse  butcher's 
knife  is  one  skin ;  a  woollen  blanket,  or  a  fathom  of 
coarse  cloth,  eight ;  and  a  fowling-piece,  fifteen."  | 

Dr.  King,  the  same  traveller  whose  evidence  is 
referred  to  in  the  Report  of  the  Aborigines  Com- 
mittee, above  quoted,  states  his  opinion  in  the  follow- 
ing words : — 

*  The  Oregon  Territory,  by  the  Rev.  C.  G.  Nicholay.  London. 
1846,    P.  162. 

\  Franklin's  Journeys,  &c.  4  Vols.,  12nio.  London.  1829. 
Vol.  i.,p.  161. 


150   EFFECTS   ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

"By  comparing  the  value  given  to  the  Indians  for 
their  furs,  and  the  price  they  are  sold  for  by  the  Hud- 
son's Bay  Company  in  London,  we  may  draw  our  con- 
clusions as  to  the  oppression  of  these  people.  Three 
marten  skins  are  obtained  for  a  coarse  knife,  the  utmost 
value  of  which,  including  the  expenses  of  conveying  it 
to  those  distant  regions,  cannot  be  estimated  at  more 
than  sixpence :  and  three  of  these  skins  were  sold  last 
January  in  London  for  five  guineas.  With  the  more 
expensive  furs,  such  as  the  black  fox  or  sea-otter,  the 
profit  is  more  than  trebled  ;  and  but  a  few  years  ago,  a 
single  skin  of  the  former  species  sold  for  fifty  guineas, 
while  the  native  obtained  in  exchange  the  value  of  two 
shillings.  Surely  the  Honourable  Company,  which  by 
Royal  Charter  is  permitted  to  reap  such  golden  harvests, 
might  appropriate  a  small  fund  to  rescue  from  starva- 
tion the  decrepit  and  diseased,  who  in  their  youthful 
days  contributed  to  its  wealth."* 

That  the  remuneration  which  the  natives  receive 
is  very  different  where  the  Company  are  brought 
into  competition  with  others,  is  sufficiently  at- 
tested by  the  following  statement  of  Mr.  Alexander 
Simpson : — 

"  The  prices  paid  to  the  Indians  for  their  furs,  are 
in  general  exceedingly  small.  Throughout  the  whole 
of  the  protected  territories,  the  value  of  goods  bestowed 
for  furs  is  certainly  under  one-twentieth  of  the  value  of 
their  furs  in  England.  While  in  places  not  protected, 
in  order  to  crush  or  prevent  competition  even  more 
than  their  full  value  has  occasionally  been  given  ;  and 
at  the  establishments  on  the  outskirts  of  Canada  the 
prices  permanently  offered  are  from   two  to  ten-fold 

*  King's  Narrative.     Vol.  ii.,  p.  53. 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    151 

greater  than  those  given  to  the  natives  of  the  regions 
over  which  an  exclusive  right  of  trade  exists."* 

The  same  testimony  is  given  by  the  Rev.  Mr. 
Beaver,  in  his  letter  to  the  Aborigines  Protection 
Society : — 

"  It  should  never  be  forgotten  that  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  are  but  as  invaders  of  the  soil  on  which  these 
excesses  are  committed  by  their  servants  ;  and  that,  a.s 
such,  the  least  they  can  do  is  to  restrain  all  unnecessary 
violence  towards  the  rightful  possessors."       ♦       *       ♦ 

"  With  respect  to  the  furs  of  that  country — to  rob 
their  lawful  owner  of  them,  by  taking  possession  of 
them,  either  with  no  payment  or  a  most  inadequate  one, 
is  surely  not  a  legitimate  method  of  teaching  him  their 
proper  use  and  value.  Of  articles  bartered  by  the  Com- 
pany for  peltry  and  other  native  produce,  one-half  may 
be  classed  as  useless,  one  quarter  as  pernicious,  and  the 
remainder  of  doubtful  utility  "f 

There  is  now  before  me  a  manuscript  Jomnal  by, 
a  Mr.  Dmm,  who  was  for  several  years  a  servant  of 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  and  who  wrote  a  book 
in  which  he  endeavoured  to  prop  up  the  character 
of  the  Company.  This  Journal  is  in  Mr.  Dunn's 
handwriting,  and  contains  notes  of  a  trading  voyage 
which  he  went  in  one  of  the  Company's  vessels  along 
the  north-west  coast.  The  trade  at  this  time  was 
open  to  both  Americans  and  English,  and  Mr.  Dunn 

•  The  Life,  &c.,  of  Thomas  Simpson,  by  his  Brother.  London. 
1845.    8vo.     P.  427. 

f  Tracts  relative  to  the  Aborigines.  London.  1843.  Tract  viii,, 
pp.  19,  20. 


152    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

fi'equently,  in  the  course  of  his  story,  records  the 
increase  in  the  price  of  furs,  in  consequence  of  the 
competition  of  the  Americans. 

One  quotation  will  be  enough  :  a  multitude  might 
be  given.     He  says : — 

"Sunday,  15. — A  fine  breeze  during  the  night :  about 
twelve  o'clock  anchored  in  Kieb  Cove  Captain  Ray- 
mond with  the  barque  '  Active,'  is  lying  here  :  the 
Indians  have  returned,  and  there  seems  an  immense 
quantity  here. 

"  Monday,  16. — Fine  weather :  traded  a  very  few  skins, 
nothing  to  speak  of;  but,  however,  we  have  done  the 
American  brig :  he  was  thinking  to  have  them  all  to 
himself: — he  then  increased  his  price,  and  we  increased 
ours. 

"  Tuesday,  1*1. — Fine  in  the  fore-part  of  the  day :  light 
showers  towards  the  evening  :  traded  several  skins,  but 
rather  dear,  as  we  are  now  opposing  the  Americans." 

Now  it  must  not  be  forgotten  that  the  evidence 
of  Captain  Wilkes,  as  well  as  of  others  who  have 
been  quoted,  as  speaking  favourably  of  the  system 
of  the  Company,  refers  only  to  this  part  of  their 
territories,  where  their  transactions  are  totally  dif- 
ferent from  what  they  are  when  not  subject  to  the 
competition  or  observation  of  others. 

WTien  we  compare  the  evidence  of  Captain  Wilkes 
and  others,  as  to  the  condition  of  the  Indians  on  the 
west  side  of  the  Rocky  Mountains,  with  all  the 
testimony  that  can  be  obtained  respecting  the  con- 
dition of  those  on  the  east  side,  or  in  Rupert's  Land, 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    153 

there  cannot  be  a  moment's  doubt  that  those  on 
the  shores  of  the  Pacific  are  in  much  the  better  con- 
dition of  the  two  ;  that  is  to  say,  that  in  that  part 
of  the  country  where  the  Company  have  had  to 
compete,  until  the  last  year  or  two,  with  the  Ameri- 
cans, tke  native  population  is  in  a  far  less  degraded 
condition  than  where  the  exclusive  trade  is  enforced. 
Yet  England  granted  this  exclusive  trade  in  mock 
humanity  to  the  native  Indian ! 

It  has  been  stated  above,  that  the  natives  are  com- 
pletely dependent  on  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company. 

The  evidence  of  Dr.  King  on  this  point  is  con- 
clusive.    He  says  : — 

"  By  various  means  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  has 
succeeded  in  rendering  the  natives  entirely  dependent 
upon  them  for  existence,  and  they  deeply  feel  their 
degraded  situation.  The  introduction  of  fire-arms  may 
be  assigned  as  one  cause,  for  as  long  as  they  could  obtain 
a  supply  of  ammunition,  they  neglected  the  use  of  the 
bow  and  arrow,  the  spear,  and  the  various  modes  of 
trapping  and  snaring  their  game ;  which,  from  constant 
disuse,  they  have  now  wholly  forgotten.  That  of 
granting  on  credit,  both  in  the  spring  and  autumn,  a 
larger  outfit  of  clothing  and  ammunition  than  the 
Indians  are  able  to  defray  by  their  winter  and  summer 
excursions,  places  them  so  completely  in  the  power  of 
the  trader  by  the  debt  thus  incurred,  that  this  must  be 
considered  another  cause  of  their  decline.  When  they 
become  advanced  in  life,  and  no  longer  able  to  hunt, 
they  are  refused  a  supply  of  ammunition  which  has 
become  essential  to  their  very  existence,  and  they  die 


154    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

consequently  from  absolute  starvation.  These  evils  have 
been  increasing  on  them  of  late  to  so  great  an  extent,  that 
they  have  become  cannibals  by  necessity ;  and  scarcely 
a  month  passes  but  some  horrible  tale  of  cannibalism  is 
brought  to  the  different  establishments."* 

The  next  point  to  be  noticed  in  the  policy  of  the 
Company  towards  the  natives,  is  the  credit  1)hat  has 
been  universally  given  them  for  having  put  an  end 
to  the  use  of  ardent  spirits  in  their  traffic. 

This  credit  has  been  given  the  Company  entirely 
upon  their  own  evidence :  whether  it  be  due  to 
them,  we  have  now  to  inquire. 

It  is  not  asserted  that  spirits  are  an  authorised 
article  of  traffic  with  the  Indians.  But  it  is  true 
that  spirits  are  habitually  used  in  the  country  for  the 
purpose  of  procuring  furs.  Whether  rum  be  paid 
as  the  nominal  equivalent  for  the  skins,  or  given 
away,  to  induce  the  Indian  to  part  with  his  skins 
for  a  specified  value,  is  one  and  the  same  thing. 

There  cannot  be  greater  nonsense,  than  to  talk 
about  the  exertions  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
to  put  a  stop  to  the  trade  of  ardent  liquors.  There 
is  not  one  article,  not  a  glass  bead,  that  finds  its 
way  into  the  whole  country  without  the  Company's 
cognizance  and  permission.  There  is  no  con- 
ceivable mode  by  which  spirits  can  get  thither,  unless 

*  King's  Narrative.     Vol.  ii.,  p.  52. 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    155 

they  be  transmitted  by  the  Company ;  there  is  abso- 
lutely no  other  means  of  conveyance.  Consequently 
one  stroke  of  Sir  J.  H.  Felly's  pen  would  prevent  a 
single  gallon  of  spirits  entering  the  country  again. 

But  the  fact  is,  that  spirits  do  find  their  way  into  the 
country,  and  are  administered  to  the  natives,  when- 
ever furs  may  be  obtained  thereby.  If  Mr.  Beaver 
could  say  that  the  life  of  an  Indian  was  never  put 
in  competition  with  a  beaver  skin,  it  is  equally  true 
that  a  beaver  skin  was  never  lost  to  the  Company 
for  want  of  a  pint  of  rum. 

And  it  is  utterly  false,  to  say  that  the  exclusive 
trade  is  necessary,  in  order  to  stop  the  supply  of 
spirits  to  the  Indians. 

Early  in  this  century  the  subject  of  preventing 
the  circulation  of  ardent  liquors  amongst  the  Indians 
occupied  the  attention  of  Mr.  Wilberforce  and 
many  other  philanthropists.  And  the  North- West 
Company,  although  competing  in  the  fur  trade  both 
with  the  Americans  and  with  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company,  entered  warmly  into  the  views  of  those 
gentlemen.  In  two  years,  the  quantity  of  spirits 
used  by  the  North- West  Company  was  lessened 
from  fifty  thousand  to  ten  thousand  gallons.  ITie 
North- West  Company  at  that  time  employed  two 
thousand  whites  in  its  service.     The  Hudson's  Bay 


156    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

Company  now  employs  about  one  thousand  white 
servants  ;  and  the  quantity  of  spirits  introduced  into 
the  country  in  the  year  1845  was  nine  thousand  and 
seventy-five  gallons:  —  that  is,  the  North- West 
Company,  under  a  system  of  free  trade,  used  only 
half  the  quantity  of  spirits  per  man,  which  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  use  under  their  monopoly. 

In  the  Report  of  the  Aborigines  Committee, 
quoted  above,  it  may  have  been  remarked  that  in- 
temperance is  spoken  of  as  a  cause  of  decrease 
amongst  the  natives  of  the  North — a  fact  which 
implies  that  they  were  supplied  with  the  means  of 
indulging  in  that  vice. 

There  is  evidence  on  this  head  which  is  unfortu- 
nately not  to  be  got  at  by  the  public.  It  is,  how- 
ever, a  fact,  that  there  are  letters  among  the  papers 
of  the  Church  Missionary  Society,  in  which  there 
is  ample  evidence  of  the  supply  of  spirits  to  the 
Indians. 

There  is  similar  evidence  among  the  documents 
of  the  Wesleyan  Methodists'  Missionary  Society. 
But  neither  of  these  bodies  think  they  are  called 
upon  to  put  these  facts  before  the  public.  This 
evidence  would,  however,  of  course,  be  forthcoming 
before  a  Parliamentary  Committee. 

We  can  do  no  more  than  assert  that  it  exists. 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN   POPULATION.    157 

But  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  have  the 
strongest  of  all  inducements,  apart  from  the 
philanthropy  for  which  we  have  been  so  ready  to 
give  them  credit,  to  prevent  the  general  use  of 
intoxicating  liquors,  which  incapacitate  the  Indian 
for  the  chase,  and  destroy  the  regularity  of  the 
supply  of  furs  on  which  the  profits  of  the  Company 
depend.  And  yet  they  put  it  within  the  power  of 
their  traders  to  distribute  this  poison  throughout 
the  country,  not  only  with  the  excuse  of  an  antici- 
pated gain,  but  sometimes  it  would  seem  for  a 
joke. 

Mr.  Ross  Cox  says,  in  his  Narrative, — 

"  All  the  Indians  on  the  Columbia  entertain  a  strong 
aversion  to  ardent  spirits,  which  they  regard  as  poison. 
They  allege  that  slaves  only  drink,  to  excess,  and  that 
drunkenness  is  degrading  to  free  men.  On  one  occasion, 
some  of  tfie  gentlemen  at  Fort  George  induced  a  son  of 
Concomby,  the  chief,  to  drink  a  few  glasses  of  rum : 
intoxication  quickly  followed,  accompanied  by  sickness, 
in  which  condition  he  returned  home  to  his  father's 
house,  and  for  a  couple  of  days  remained  in  a  state  of 
stupor.  The  old  chief  subsequently  reproached  the 
people  at  the  Fort  for  having  degraded  his  son  by 
making  him  drink,  and  thereby  exposing  him  to  the 
laughter  of  his  slaves."* 

Mr.  King  also,  in  his  Narrative  already  quoted, 

•  Narrative  of  Six  Years'  Residence  on  the  Western  Side  of  tlie 
Rocky  Mounfciing,  by  Kom  Cox.     Bentley,     1831.     Vol.  i.,  p.  321. 


158    EFFECTS   ON    THE   INDIAN    POPULATION. 

states  that  the  Chippewyans  beyond  Cumberland 
House  are  averse  to  the  use  of  spirituous  liquors, 
and  to  this  cause  may  be  imputed  not  only  their 
superiority  in  numbers,  but  in  moral  character 
also.* 

Again,  at  page  50  of  the  same  work,  we  read, — 

"  The  agents  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  are  not 
satisfied  with  putting  so  insignificant  a  value  upon  the 
furs,  that  the  more  active  hunters  only  can  gain  a  sup- 
port, which  necessarily  leads  to  the  death  of  the  more 
aged  and  infirm  by  starvation  and  cannibalism,  but  they 
encourage  the  intemperate  use  of  ardent  spirits.  From 
the  effect  of  intoxication  upon  Europeans,  an  adequate 
notion  of  the  frenzy  with  which  a  North  American 
Indian  is  inspired  when  under  the  influence  of  liquor, 
can  scarcely  be  formed.  He  will  then  with  equal 
indifference  shed  the  blood  of  a  friend  or  foe  ;  his 
dearest  connexions  are  murdered  without  compunction  ; 
and  when  the  unfortunate  wretch  has  recovered  his 
reason,  he  laments  in  vain  the  misery  which  his  own 
fury  has  entailed  upon  him.  Notwithstanding  the 
Indians  justly  ascribe  to  the  fur  traders  the  blame  of 
having  supplied  them  with  that  which  has  caused  such 
desolation,  they  will  not  scruple  to  seize  the  first  oppor- 
tunity of  again  obtaining  the  poisonous  draught,  and 
plunging  with  headlong  infatuation  into  new  scenes  of 
riot  and  bloodshed." 

And  again,  at  page  51, — 

"  Additionally,  the  natives  clearly  perceive  that  the 
use  of  spirituous  liquors  is  depopulating  their  country  in 
a  fearful  manner,  and  yet  they  have  not  strength  of 

•  King's  Narrative.     Vol.  ii.,  p.  52. 


EFFECTS   ON   THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    159 

mind  to  withstand  the  temptation  which  the  traders, 
from  interested  motives,  are  daily  holding  out  to  them 
by  an  ample  supply,  as  long  as  they  have  any  furs  to 
barter." 

But  the  opinion  of  Mr.  Alexander  Simpson,  one 

of  the  Company's  own  chief  traders,  is  to  the  same 

effect.     He  says, — 

That  body  (the  Hudson's  Bay  Company)  has  assumed 
much  credit  for  its  discontinuance  of  the  sale  of  spi- 
rituous liquors  at  its  trading  establishments ;  but  I 
apprehend  that  in  this  matter  it  has  both  claimed  and 
received  more  of  praise  than  is  its  due.  The  issue  of 
spirits  has  not  been  discontinued  by  it  on  principle, 
indewi  has  not  been  discontinued  at  all  where  there  is  a 
possibility  of  diminution  of  trade  through  the  Indians 
having  the  power  to  resent  this  deprivation  of  their 
accustomed  and  much-loved  annual  jollification,  by  car- 
rying their  furs  to  another  market."* 

Mr.  Kennedy,  once  a  servant  of  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company,  has  been  publishing  some  letters  to 
Lord  Elgin  on  the  subject  of  the  policy  of  that  body. 
Whether  Mr.  Kennedy  has,  as  I  have  heard,  it 
hinted,  any  private  reasons  for  thus  attacking  the 
Company,  I  do  not  know — nor  is  it  of  any  im- 
portance. 

Two  boys  once  on  a  time  robbed  their  mas- 
ter's orchard :    one  demanding  too  large  a  share 

*  MS.  Report  on  the  Condition  of  the  North  American  Indians, 
addressed  to  the  Aborigines'  Protection  Society,  by  Alexander 
Simpson. 


160    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

of  the  spoil,  the  other  told  the  master  of  the  rob- 
bery. The  master  called  the  delinquents  before 
him.  "  Please,  sir,"  said  the  first  boy,  "  he  told 
you  out  of  spite,  because  he  could  not  get  more  of 
the  apples."  "  That  may  be,"  said  tlie  master ; 
"  but  did  you  rob  my  orchard  ?"  So  let  it  be  with 
Mr.  Kennedy  and  the  Company.  It  is  a  matter  of 
no  importance  why  Mr.  Kennedy  tells  tales :  the 
question  is.  Does  he  tell  truth  ?  Mr.  Kennedy  says, 
in  one  of  his  letters, — 

"  Your  Excellency  is  said  to  have  reported  *  that  in 
your  opinion  the  government  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  was  good  ;'  and  I  most  readily  grant  that,  in 
so  far  as  they  have  laid  down  rules  and  regulations,  none 
can  be  better,  as  any  one  may  judge  from  the  following, 
which,  as  they  apply  to  the  cases  I  intend  bringing 
before  your  notice,  I  transcribe. 

"  Rules  and  Regulations. — '  That  Indians  be  treated 
with  kindness  and  indulgence,  and  mild  and  conciliating 
means  resorted  to,  in  order  to  encourage  industry, 
redress  vice,  and  inculcate  morality ;  that  the  tise  of 
spirituous  liquors  be  gradually  discontinued  in  the  few 
districts  in  which  it  is  yet  indispensable  ;  and  that  the 
Indians  be  liberally  supplied  with  the  requisite  necessa- 
ries, particularly  with  the  article  of  ammunition, 
whether  they  have  the  means  of  paying  for  it  or  not. 

"  '  That,  for  the  moral  and  religious  improvement  of 
the  servants,  and  more  effectual  civilization  and  instruc- 
tion of  the  families  attached  to  the  different  establish- 
ments, and  the  Indians,  on  every  Sunday  Divine  Service 
be  publicly  read  with  becoming  solemnity,  either 
once  or  twice  a  day,  to  be  regulated  by  the  number,  at 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    161 

which  every  man,  woman,  and  child,  resident,  will  be 
required  to  attend,  together  with  any  of  the  Indians 
who  may  be  at  hand,  and  whom  it  may  be  proper  to 
invite.  And  for  which  service  appropriate  religious 
books  will  be  furnished  by  and  on  account  of  the 
Company.' 

"  These,  my  Lord,  cannot  but  command  universal 
assent ;  and  it  was,  until  a  very  late  period  of  my  con- 
nexion with  the  Company,  ever  my  pride  and  boast 
to  have  been  brought  up  for,  and  in,  a  service  where 
such  a  healthful  code  of  rules  existed.  But,  to  my  utter 
astonishment,  I  came  to  see  that  these  rules  were  often 
treated  as  a  dead  letter,  as  you,  my  Lord,  may  judge 
from  the  following  circumstances." 

Mr.  Kennedy  then  relates  the  case  of  an  atrocious 
murder,  which  was  perpetrated  through  the  influence 
of  "  traded  rum^^  at  the  very  door  of  one  of  the 
Company's  establishments;  and  that  the  Company 
refused  to  take  any  notice  of  the  offence,  because 
the  murderer  was  one  of  the  "best  fur  hunters"  at 
the  post.     He  continues, — 

"  This  circumstance  was  among  the  first  instances  in 
which  misrule  of  so  gross  a  kind  had  passed  before  my 
own  personal  observation.  It  afforded  me  an  excellent  op- 
portunity of  testing  the  health  of  some  of  their  standing 
rules,  and  that  which  I  first  transcribed  is  referred  to. 
The  trading  post  at  which  this  had  taken  place  was  en- 
trusted, soon  after,  to  my  care ;  and,  on  assuming  my 
duties,  it  was  my  first  care  to  do  away  entirely  with  the 
use  of  intoxicating  liquors,  to  which  the  Indians  readily 
submitted.     The  attempt  was  crushed  in  the  birth,  as  I 

M 


162      EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION, 


was  forthwith  told  if  I  persisted  in  doing  so,  I  should 
abide  the  consequences :  which  meant,  that  if  fewer 
furs  M^ere  collected,  and  less  profits  made  than  usual,  I 
must  bear  the  blame." 

In  a  letter  to  the  Kingston  Chronicle  newspaper, 
27th  September,  1848,  the  same  gentleman  says, — 

"  The  Hudson's  Bay  Company  have,  in  some  instances, 
with  their  rum,  traded  the  goods  given  in  presents  to 
the  Indians  by  the  Canadian  Government,  and  after- 
wards re-traded  the  same  with  them  at  an  advance  of 
little  short  of  a  thousand  per  cent. !  !  Let  any  magis- 
trate be  named  in  Kingston,  and  I  will  get  the  man  who 
did  it  by  their  orders  to  swear  to  the  fact." 

These  are  facts  or  falsehoods.  At  any  rate, 
coming  along  with  so  much  other  testimony  from 
independent  persons,  they  do  demand  inquiry. 

The  following  extracts  from  the  MS.  Journal  of 
Mr.  Dunn,  before  quoted,  are  well  worthy  of  re- 
mark. They  are  the  simple  notes  of  passing  events, 
put  upon  paper,  with  no  apparent  object,  but  for  the 
writer's  satisfaction ;  and  the  incidental  manner  in 
which  the  trading  with  spirits  is  mentioned,  is  strong 
evidence  that  it  was  an  ordinary  custom. 

"Sunday,  March  11,  1832. — It  being  Sunday,  the 
Indians  remained  in  their  huts,  (perhaps)  praying,  or 
most  likely  singing,  over  the  rum  they  had  traded  with 
us  on  Saturday,  making  a  great  noise. 

"Thursday,  April  26. — This  has  been  a  very  fine 
day,  a  great  many  Indians  on  board,   and   we   have 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       163 

traded  a  number  of  skins.  They  seem  to  like  rum  very- 
much  here.  We  have  sold  an  immense  quantity  of 
molasses  also. 

"Friday,  May  4. — A  few  Indians  on  board  with  skins 
in  the  evening ;  they  were  all  drunk :  went  on  shore ; 
made  a  fire  about  1 1  o'clock  ;  being  then  all  drunk, 
began  firing  upon  one  another. 

"  Saturday,  June  30. — The  Indians  are  now  bringing 
their  blankets  to  trade,  as  their  skins  are  all  gone  :  they 
seem  very  fond  of  rum. 

"  Wednesday,  July  11. — This  morning  the  chiefs  had 
a  grand  feast  among  themselves.  They  traded  a 
quantity  of  rum  from  us,  singing  during  the  day." 

It  is  impossible  not  to  conlude  from  such  evidence, 
that  the  statement  put  forward  that  the  Company 
have  put  a  stop  to  the  sale  of  spirits  since  they 
obtained  the  Licence  of  Trade  in  1821,  is  entirely 
contrary  to  the  truth. 

On  this  head  we  shall  adduce  only  one  more  wit- 
ness ;  but  it  is  an  important  one.  Not  long  ago  it 
was  thought  advisable  that  the  evidence  of  some 
men  who  had  been  in  the  service  of  the  Company, 
and  who  have  since  returned  to  the  Orkney  Islands, 
their  native  place,  should  be  procured  on  some  points 
relative  to  the  proceedings  of  the  Company.  The 
examination  was  made,  and  is  attested,  by  five 
thoroughly  trustworthy  and  respectable  persons. 
The  evidence  of  these  men  may  some  day  form 
part  of  a  Parliamentary  paper.     It  is  sufiicient  here 

M  2 


164     EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

to  quote  one  question,  and  the  answers  given  by 
them, — men  who  had  been  in  the  service  of  the 
Company  in  various  parts  of  the  territories,  and  for 
a  period  of  many  years. 

The  question  put,  was  as  follows : — 

"  Are  intoxicating  liquors  supplied  in  any  part  of  the 
country — and  where  ?" 

The  answers  by  the  five  men  severally,  were — 

1.  "  Intoxicating  liquors  were  supplied  to  the  Indians 
at  all  the  places  where  I  was. 

2.  "  All  but  the  Mandan  Indians  were  desirous  to 
obtain  intoxicating  liquors,  and  the  Company  supply 
them  with  it  freely. 

3.  "  At  Jack  River,  I  saw  spirits  given  in  exchange 
for  furs. 

4.  "  At  York  Factory,  and  at  Oxford  House, 

5.  "  At  Norway  House  only." 

But  one  of  the  most  suspicious  facts  which  has 
come  out,  is  that  alluded  to  in  Mr.  Gladstone's 
speech,  on  the  10th  August  last — viz.,  that  in  the 
year  1837,  the  year  in  which  the  Company  were 
trying  to  obtain  the  renewal  of  the  licence  of  ex- 
clusive trade,  the  quantity  of  spirits  introduced  into 
the  country  was  only  3,800  gallons  ;  whilst  in  1845, 
the  quantity  was  9,075  gallons.  This  statement  has 
never  yet  been  denied  :  is  it  true,  or  not  ? 

Now  it  may  be  supposed  that  this  policy  has  not 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       165 

heen  carried  on  for  so  many  years,  without  pro- 
ducing its  natural  results.  Recollecting  that  this 
monopoly  has  been  granted  and  continued  on  the 
very  grounds  that  without  it  the  Indian  race  would 
be  greatly  injured — recollecting  that  the  public 
have  been  deceived  into  the  belief  that  their  bene- 
volent intentions  have  been  realized,  it  is  with 
something  like  indignation  we  now  leam  that  the 
sole  benefit  gained  from  the  whole  transaction  has 
been  by  the  232  proprietors  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company's  Stock. 

What  do  witnesses  who  are  not  in  the  pay  or 
interest  of  the  Company  say,  with  respect  to  the 
condition  of  the  Indian  ?  And  what  is  the  real 
truth  as  to  the  increase  or  decrease  of  the  Indian 
population  ?  The  Company  have  put  this  forward 
as  a  test  of  the  success  of  their  sway:  let  them 
stand  or  fall  by  it. 

"  Tliere  are  some  extensive  tracts  of  country  in  which 
the  means  of  subsistence  are  scanty  in  the  extreme.  In 
the  region  lying  between  Lake  Superior  and  Winnipeg, 
the  natives  during  the  winter  can  with  difficulty  collect 
enough  of  food  to  support  life.  In  the  country  lying 
immediately  north  of  the  Canadas,  though  fur-bearing 
animab  are  still  comparatively  numerous,  and  the  trade 
consequently  valuable,  the  poor  Indians  have  at  all 
times  a  hard  fight  against  famine.  In  this  tract  of 
country  fish  is  at  all  seasons  scarce,  and  in  winter  the 
sole  dependence  of  the  natives  for  subsistence  is  placed 


166      EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

upon  rabbits,  (the  most  wretched  food  upon  which  to 
exist  for  any  time  that  can  possibly  be  conceived,)  and 
when  these  fail  the  most  frightful  tragedies  at  times 
take  place.  Parents  have  been  known  to  lengthen  out 
a  miserable  existence,  by  killing  and  devouring  their 
own  offspring."* 

It  is  not  a  charge  against  the  Company  that  the 
country  is  not  fertile  by  nature  ;  but  it  is  a  charge 
that  there  is  not  one  single  vestige  of  any  attempt 
on  the  part  of  the  civilised  man  to  assist  or  to  teach 
the  savage  to  overcome  its  natural  sterility,  and  to 
change  the  precarious  livelihood  obtained  by  the 
chase,  for  a  certain  subsistence  derived  from  the 
cultivation  of  the  soil. 

Mr.  Kennedy,  in  his  letter  to  Lord  Elgin,  already 
quoted,  gives  the  following  extracts  from  letters 
received  by  him  last  autumn  and  this  spring,  from 
correspondents  in  the  Hudson  Bay  Company's  ter- 
ritories. 

"  One  says : — 'You  will  be  grieved  to  learn  that  the 
curse  which  had  effect  in  the  old  country,  has  extended 
here,  though  arising  from  causes  of  more  frequent  occur- 
rence than  even  the  failure  of  the  crops.  Starvation  has, 
I  learn,  committed  great  havoc  among  your  old  friends 
the  Nascopies,  numbers  of  whom  met  their  death  from 
"want  last  winter.  Whole  camps  of  them  were  found  dead 
without  one  survivor  to  tell  the  tale  of  their  sufferings  ; 
others  sustained  life  in  a  way  the  most  revolting,  by 

*  Life  of  Thomas  Simpson,  p.  429. 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       167 

using  as  food  the  dead  bodies  of  their  companions ; 
some  even  bled  their  own  children  to  death,  and  sus- 
tained life  with  their  bodies  ! ' " 

"  Another  letter  says: — '  At  Fort  Nascopie,  the  Indians 
were  dying  in  dozens  by  starvation ;  and,  among  others, 
your  old  friend,  Paytabais.' " 

"  A  third  says : — *  A  great  number  of  Indians  starved 

to  death  last  winter,  and  says  it  was 's 

fault  in  not  giving  them  enough  of  ammunition ! '  " 

The  following  is  from  Dr.  King's  Narrative  : — 

"  A  few  days  afterwards,  an  Indian  in  a  diseased  state, 
with  his  wife  and  three  children,  arrived  in  so  miserable 
a  condition  that  they  were  mere  skeletons;  and,  in  the 
evening  of  the  same  day,  another  Indian  came  in  with 
two  boys,  of  the  age  of  ten  and  fourteen  years  The 
latter  we  soon  got  rid  of;  and  on  the  13th,  the  two 
women  and  foiu*  children  were  sent  away :  the  diseased 
Indian  was  allowed  to  remain  ;  in  fact,  his  legs  were  so 
excoriated,  from  the  constant  friction  of  his  frozen  robe 
against  them,  that  he  literally  could  not  move.  He 
soon,  however,  recovered  and  followed — but  not  to  join 
them  ;  for  out  of  that  party  of  nine,  not  a  soul  escaped. 
Poor  creatures!  they  lay  stretched  on  the  lake  far 
happier,  let  us  hope,  than  the  disconsolate  being  who 
was  destined  to  witness  so  horrid  a  spectacle.  The 
temperature,  on  their  departure,  was  92°  below  the 
freezing  point;  and,  four  days  afterwards,  the  ther- 
mometer descended  as  low  as  102°.  Such  intense  cold, 
in  their  emaciated  state,  very  soon  put  an  end  to  their 
sufferings. 

"  The  old  woman  was  found  at  the  same  time  frozen 
in  her  hut ;  a  circumstance  so  little  anticipated,  that  it 
was  not  until  the  dogs  had  dragged  her  out  from  her 
miserable  dwelling,  that  we  were  aware  of  it.  That 
calamity  was  the  more  deplorable,  as  she  had  recovered 


168    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

of  late  SO  rapidly,  that  in  a  few  days  more  she  would,  in 
all  human  probability,  have  walked  again.  No  time 
was  lost  in  burying  the  body,  as  the  only  means  of 
saving  it  from  the  voracious  dogs,  which  had  of  late 
been  on  very  short  allowance  of  pemican — a  food  that 
does  not  agree  with  the  canine  species. 

"  At  that  time,  between  forty  and  fifty  human  beings 
lay  dead  around  us,  and  so  scattered,  that  it  was  im- 
possible to  walk  in  any  direction  within  twenty  miles, 
Avithout  stumbling  against  a  frozen  body.  This  was 
not,  however,  a  solitary  instance  of  extreme  misfortune 
to  the  natives  of  the  north,  for  the  two  previous  years 
had  been  pregnant  with  the  same  appalling  visitations 
to  the  inhabitants  of  the  country  about  Slave  Lake  and 
Mackenzie's  River.  In  the  neighbourhood  of  the 
Riviere  au  Liard,  a  tributary  to  the  Mackenzie  from  tlie 
M'estward,  many  of  the  Chippewyans  had  been  destroyed 
by  famine :  the  actual  number  of  deaths  could  not  be 
ascertained,  with  the  exception  of  forty  of  the  choicest 
hunters,  whose  fate  was  known.  Considering,  therefore, 
that  their  wives  and  families  were  equally  unfortunate, 
and,  generally  speaking,  they  are  the  first  to  fall  a 
sacrifice,  there  could  not  have  been  a  less  number  than 
from  100  to  150  of  our  fellow-creatures  deprived  of  life 
at  that  place  alone.  It  will  not  require  many  such 
years  to  exterminate  the  whole  of  the  noble  and  intel- 
ligent races  of  the  north."* 

An  extremely  agreeable  book  has  lately  appeared 
by  Mr.  Ballantyne,  containing  a  description  of  the 
Hudson's  Bay  territories.  This  account  is  mani- 
festly favourable  to  the  Company ;  but  the  author 
seems  to  have  written  with  the  joyous  and  happy 

•  Vol.  i.,  p.  169—171. 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    169 

impressions  of  youth,  and  to  have  viewed  the  sunny 
side  of  all  that  came  under  his  observation.  But 
even  in  this  work  we  find  evidence  of  a  similar  nature 
to  that  given  above,  in  such  passages  as  the  fol- 
lowing : — 

"  At  these  posts,  the  Indians  are  frequently  reduced 
to  cannibalism ;  and  the  Company's  people  have,  on 
more  than  one  occasion,  been  obliged  to  eat  their 
beaver  skins.  *  *  ♦  This  was  the  case  one  winter 
in  Peel's  River,  a  post  within  the  Arctic  circle  in  chaise 
of  Mr,  Bell,  a  chief  trader  in  the  service ;  and  I 
remember  well  reading  in  one  of  his  letters,  that  all 
the  fresh  provision  they  had  been  able  to  procure 
during  the  winter  M'as,  two  squirrels  and  one  crow. 
During  this  time  they  had  existed  on  a  quantity  of 
dried  meat,  which  they  fortunately  had  in  store,  and 
they  were  obliged  to  lock  the  gates  of  the  fort  to 
preserve  the  remainder  from  the  wretched  Indians, 
who  were  eating  each  other  outside  the  walls.  The 
cause  of  all  this  misery  was  the  entire  failure  of  the 
fisheries,  together  with  great  scarcity  of  wild  animals. 
Starvation  is  quite  common  among  the  Indians  of 
those  distant  regions ;  and  the  scraped  rocks,  divested 
of  their  covering  of  tripe  de  roche,  which  resembles 
dried  seaweed,  have  a  sad  meaning  and  melancholy 
appearance  to  the  travellers  who  journey  through  the 
wilds  and  solitudes  of  Rupert's  Land."* 

"  If  an  old  man  or  woman  of  the  tribe  becomes  infirm, 
and  unable  to  proceed  with  the  rest  when  travelling,  he 
or  she,  as  the  case  may  be,  is  left  behind  in  a  small  tent 
made  of  willows,  in  which  are  placed  a  little  firewood, 
some  provisions,  and  a  vessel  of  water.     Here  the  un- 

•  Balkntyne's  Hudion  Bay.    Second  Edition.     P.  120. 


170      EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

happy  wretch  remains  in  solitude  till  the  fuel  and  pro- 
visions are  exhausted,  and  then  dies."* 

The  fiction  as  to  the  increase  of  the  native  popu- 
lation on  the  north-west  coast  is  destroyed  at  once 
by  the  testimony  of  Captain  Wilkes,  from  whose 
work  so  much  has  been  quoted  by  the  Company's 
champion. 

"  During  my  stay  at  Vancouver,  I  frequently  saw 
Casenove,  the  chief  of  the  Klackatack  tribe.  He  lives 
in  a  lodge  near  the  village  of  Vancouver,  and  has  always 
been  a  warm  friend  of  the  whites.  He  was  lord  of  all 
this  domain.  His  village  was  situated  about  six  miles 
below  Vancouver,  on  the  north  side  of  the  river,  and 
within  the  last  fifteen  years  was  quite  populous.  He 
then  could  muster  four  or  five  hundred  warriors ;  but 
the  ague  and  fever  have,  within  a  short  space  of  time, 
swept  off  the  whole  tribe,  and  it  is  said  that  they  all 
died  within  three  weeks.  He  now  stands  alone, — his 
land,  tribe,  and  property,  all  departed,  and  he  left  a 
dependant  on  the  bounty  of  the  Company. 

"  Casenove's  tribe  is  not  the  only  one  that  has  suffered 
in  this  way  ;  many  others  have  been  swept  off  entirely 
by  this  fatal  disease,  without  having  a  single  survivor  to 
tell  the  melancholy  tale."f 

Mr.  Parker,  the  American  missionary,  also  says — 

"  I  have  found  the  Indian  population  in  the  lower 
country,  that  is  below  the  falls  of  the  Columbia,  less 

•  BallaDtyne',8  Hudson  Bay.     Second  Edition.     P.  56. 
f  Commodore  Wilkes'  Narrative  of  the  United  States  Exploring 
Expedition.    Vol.  iv.,  p.  369. 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.      171 

than  I  had  expected,  or  than  it  was  when  Lewis  and 
Clarke  made  their  tour.  Since  the  year  1 829,  probably 
seven-eighths,  if  not  as  Dr.  M'Laughlin  believes,  nine- 
tenths,  of  the  entire  population  have  been  swept  away  by 
disease,  principally  by  fever  and  ague.  Trfie  malig- 
nancy of  these  diseases  may  have  been  increased  by  pre- 
disposing causes,  such  as  intemperance,  and  the  general 
spread  of  venereal  since  their  intercourse  with  sailors. 
But  a  more  direct  cause  of  the  great  mortality  was  their 
mode  of  treatment."* 

In  a  note  to  this  passage,  in  Chambers'  edition 
of  Parker's  Journal,  we  find  the  following  : — 

"  In  taking  leave  of  the  territories  on  the  Columbia, 
it  may  be  proper  to  mention  a  circumstance  very  slightly 
noticed  by  Mr.  Parker — the  dreadful  depopulation 
which  has  already  taken  place  amongst  the  Indian  tribes 
in  this  extreme  western  district,  caused  by  the  practice 
of  incessant  and  murderous  wars,  and  also  the  visitation 
of  diseases,  introduced  by  the  white  men.  The  subject  is 
thus  alhided  to  by  Mr.  Townsend  : — '  The  Indians  of 
the  Columbia  were  once  a  numerous  and  powerful  people ; 
the  shores  of  the  river,  for  scores  of  miles,  was  lined 
with  their  villages  ;  the  council  fire  was  frequently 
lighted,  the  pipes  passed  round,  and  the  destinies  of  the 
nation  deliberated  upon.  War  was  declared  against 
neighbouring  tribes ;  the  deadly  tomahawk  was  lifted, 
and  not  buried  until  it  was  red  with  the  blood  of  the 
savage  ;  the  bounding  deer  was  hunted  and  killed,  and 
his  antlers  ornamented  the  wigwam  of  the  red  man ; 
the  scalps  of  the  Indian's  enemies  hung  drying  in  the 
smoke  of  his  lodge,  and  he  was  happy.  Now,  alas! 
where  is  he  ?  gone — gathered  to  his  fathers,  and  to  his 

♦  Journal  of  a  Tour  beyond  the  Rocky  Mountains,  by  the  Rev. 
S.Parker.    Ithaca,  New  York.     1938.    P.  178. 


172    EFFECTS   ON   THE    INDIAN   POPULATION. 

happy  grounds ;  his  place  knows  him  no  more.  The 
depopulation  has  been  truly  fearful.  A  gentleman  told 
me,  that  only  four  years  ago,  as  he  wandered  near  what 
had  formerly  been  a  thickly-peopled  village,  he  counted 
no  less  than  sixteen  dead  men  and  women  lying  unburied, 
and  festering  in  the  sun,  in  front  of  their  habitations. 
Within  the  houses  all  were  sick  ;  not  one  had  escaped 
the  contagion :  upwards  of  one  hxmdred  individuals, 
men,  women,  and  children,  were  writhing  in  agony  on 
the  floors  of  the  houses,  with  no  one  to  render  them  any 
assistance ;  some  were  in  the  dying  struggle,  and 
clenching,  with  the  convulsive  grasps  of  death,  their 
disease-worn  companions,  shrieked  and  howled  in  the 
last  sharp  agony.  Probably  there  does  not  now  exist 
one,  where  five  years  ago  there  was  a  hundred  Indians ; 
and  in  sailing  up  the  river  from  the  Cape  of  the  Cas- 
cades, the  only  evidence  of  the  existence  of  the  Indian, 
is  an  occasional  miserable  wigwam,  with  a  few  wretched 
half-starved  occupants.'  "* 

It  is  not  possible  that  men  occupying  the  position 
which  is  held  by  the  Company's  agents,  at  their 
remote  trading  posts,  should  not  reflect,  in  their  own 
character  and  conduct,  the  scenes  by  which  they 
are  surrounded. 

The  consciousness  of  uncontrolled  power  is,  under 
any  circumstances,  a  fearful  trial  to  man :  hut  here 
is  power  exercised  amid  the  measureless  forest,  from 
which  no  echo  can  come  to  tell  the  horrors  by  which 
it  is  surrounded,  nor  voice  can  penetrate  to  call  its 

*  Id.     Chambers'  Edition.    Note,  p.  69. 


EFFECTS   ON    THE   INDIAN    POPULATION.    173 

possessor  to  account.  This  is  a  system  which  plants 
the  civilised  man  amongst  savages,  not  to  illumine 
their  darkness,  but  to  be  absorbed  into  their  gloom. 

Those  who  have  seen  what  is  going  on  in  this 
remote  coimtry,  and  who  have  no  longer  the  gag  upon 
their  mouths,  which  the  strict  discipline  of  the  Com- 
pany imposes,  tell  many  fearful  tales  of  the  scenes 
which  are  sometimes  enacted.  But  enough  has 
already  been  published  to  justify  the  demand  for 
inquiry. 

The  Rev.  Mr.  Beaver  thus  writes  to  the  Abori- 
gines Protection  Society,  in  1842  : — 

"  About  the  middle  of  the  summer  1836,  and  shortly 
before  my  arrival  at  Fort  Vancouver,  six  Indians  were 
wantonly  and  gratuitously  murdered  by  a  party  of  trap- 
pers and  sailors,  who  landed  for  the  purpose  from  one  of 
the  Company's  vessels,  on  the  coast  somewhere  between 
the  mouth  of  the  River  Columbia,  and  the  confines  of 
California.  Having  on  a  former  occasion  read  the  par- 
ticulars of  this  horrid  massacre  as  I  received  them  from 
an  eye  witness,  before  a  Meeting  of  the  Aborigines 
Society,  I  will  not  repeat  them.  To  my  certain  know- 
ledge, the  circumstance  was  brought  officially  before 
the  authorities  of  Vancouver,  by  whom  no  notice  was 
taken  of  it ;  and  the  same  party  of  trappers,  with  the 
same  leader,  one  of  the  most  infamous  murderers  of  a 
murderous  fraternity,  is  annually  sent  to  the  same  vici- 
nity, to  perform,  if  they  please,  other  equally  tragic 
scenes.  God  alone  knows  how  many  red  men's  lives 
have  been  sacrificed  by  them  since  the  time  of  which  I 
have  been  speaking.     He  also  knows  that  I  speak  the 


174       EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

conviction  of  my  mind,  and  may  He  forgive  me  if  I 
speak  unadvisedly,  when  I  state  my  firm  belief  that 

THE  LIFE  OP  AN  INDIAN  WAS  NEVER  YET,  BY  A 
TKAPPER,    PUT    IN    COMPETITION     WITH    A     BEAVEr's 

SKIN  !  The  very  way  in  which  the  aborigines  are 
spoken  of  by  the  trappers,  and  leaders  of  trapping 
parties,  goes  far  to  prove  the  correctness  of  my  assertion. 
'  Those  d — — d,'  '  those  rascally,'  '  those  treacherous 
Indians,'  are  the  unmerited  appellations,  by  which  the 
race  is  universally  designated. 

"  In  the  former  part  of  the  same  year,  I  was  credibly 
informed  that  the  same  party  killed  one  Indian,  wounded 
another,  (supposed  mortally,)  and  threw  a  child  into  the 
fire,  in  consequence  of  a  quarrel  respecting  a  knife, 
which  was  afterwards  found  upon  one  of  themselves. 
And  during  the  year  before,  they  put  four  Indians  to 
death  for  stealing  their  horses,  which  might  be  pleaded 
as  some  excuse  for  the  brutality,  but  that  they  after- 
wards killed  ten  or  twelve  more  in  cold  blood,  and  set 
fire  to  their  village.  The  Indians  lived  in  such  con- 
stant dread  of  this  party,  that  they  were  unable  to 
descend  into  the  plains  from  their  fastnesses  in  the 
mountains,  to  procure  their  usual  modes  of  subsistence."* 

"  Since  writing  the  above,"  he  adds  at  the  end  of  his 
communication,  "  I  have  learned  from  good  authority, 
that  in  the  month  of  August  1840,  an  Indian  was 
hanged  near  the  mouth  of  the  Columbia  River,  and 
several  others  shot,  and  their  village  set  on  fire,  by  a 
party  in  the  employment  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
under  the  command  of  Chief  Factor  M'Laughlin,  who 
led  them  from  Fort  Vancouver ;  thus  indiscriminately 
to  revenge  the  death  of  a  man,  who  lost  his  life  in  an 
affray  whilst  curing  salmon."f 

*  Tracts  relative  to   the  Aborigines.      London,      1842.      8to, 
Tract  viii.,  p.  19. 
f  Id.,  p.  22. 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       175 

Lieutenant  Chappell,  in  his  "  Voyage  to  Hudson's 
Bay  in  H.M.S.  Rosamond,"  relates  that  on  one 
occasion  an  English  boy  having  been  missed  from 
one  of  the  establishments  in  Hudson's  Bay,  the 
Company's  servants,  in  order  to  recover  the  absent 
youth,  made  use  of  the  following  stratagem  : — 

"  Two  Esquimaux  Indians  were  seized  and  confined 
in  separate  apartments.  A  musket  was  discharged  in  a 
remote  apartment,  and  the  settlers  entering  the  room  in 
which  one  of  the  Esquimaux  was  confined,  they  in- 
formed him  by  signs  that  his  comrade  had  been  put  to 
death  for  decoying  away  the  boy ;  and  they  gave  him  to 
understand  at  the  same  time,  that  he  must  prepare  to 
undergo  the  same  fate,  unless  he  would  faithfully  pledge 
himself  to  restore  the  absentee.  The  Esquimaux  natu- 
rally promised  everj'thing,  and  on  being  set  at  liberty 
made  the  best  of  his  way  into  the  woods,  and  of  course 
was  never  afterwards  heard  of.  They  kept  the  other 
a  prisoner  for  some  time  :  at  length  he  tried  to  make  his 
escape,  by  boldly  seizing  the  sentinel's  firelock  at 
night,  but  the  piece  accidentally  going  off,  he  was  so 
terrified  at  the  report,  that  they  easily  replaced  him  in 
confinement;  yet  either  the  loss  of  liberty,  a  supposition 
that  his  countryman  had  been  murdered,  or  that  he  was 
himself  reserved  for  some  cruel  death,  deprived  the  poor 
wretch  of  reason.  As  he  became  exceedingly  trouble- 
some, the  settlers  held  a  conference  as  to  the  most  eli- 
gible mode  of  getting  rid  of  him ;  and  it  being  deemed 
good  policy  to  deter  the  natives  from  similar  offences  by 
making  an  example,  they  accordingly  shot  the  poor 
maniac  in  cold  blood,  without  having  given  themselves 
the  trouble  to  ascertain  whether  he  was  really  guilty  or 
innocent.^'* 

•  P.  156. 


176    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

In  a  letter  to  the  Kingston  Chronicle  newspaper, 
of  September  27th,  1848,  Mr.  Kennedy  writes  as 
follows : — 

"  It  is  not  many  years  since  that  a  trading  post  of  the 
Company,  situated  on  the  southern  shore  of  James' 
Bay,  was  cut  off  almost  to  a  man  by  the  Indians  :  it  is 
said  they  were  provoked  to  it.  To  revenge  this,  the 
Company  fitted  out  an  armed  expedition,  which  in  time 
came  upon  the  party,  and  though  they  were  perfectly 
unresisting,  the  culprit  said  to  have  been  the  leader  in 
that  affair  was  bound  hand  and  foot,  and  without  the 
least  form  of  trial  whatsoever,  was  shattered  to  pieces  ; 
each  man  of  the  expedition  all  but  touching  the  body 
with  the  muzzle  of  his  gun  before  drawing  his  trigger. 
The  Company  had  not  even  the  humanity  in  this 
butchery  to  prevent  one  brother-in-law  from  shooting 
the  other." 

These  are  some  of  the  tales  which  are  told  by 
those  teho  have  lived  in  the  Company's  territories. 
But  they  are  not  all.  There  are  rumours  of 
tragedies  which  it  becomes  no  one  to  detail  who 
cannot  vouch  for  their  truth.  There  are  stories 
credited  by  men  who  have  been  formerly  servants 
of  the  Company,  I  believe  I  might  have  said 
witnessed  by  them,  which  nothing  but  a  Parlia- 
mentary inquiry  could  thoroughly  elicit. 

And  why  do  we  enlarge  on  these  melancholy 
scenes.  It  is  not  from  any  mock  philanthropy,  or 
because  we  expect  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  to 
transform  savages  at  once  into  Christians.     It  is 


EFFECTS    ON   THE    INDIAN   POPULATION.    177 

not  that  we  do  not  know  there  must  be  a  diflBculty 
in  administering  the  law  and  maintaining  order 
over  the  boimdless  domain  which  has  been  entrusted 
to  their  Government.  But  when  this  Company 
have  made  use  of  an  appeal  to  our  philanthropy 
to  advance  their  own  interests ; — when  they  have 
advocated  their  own  rights,  on  the  grounds  that  the 
native  Indian  is  benefited  by  their  rule ; — when  an 
attention  to  the  condition  of  the  Indian  is  one  of  the 
very  duties  imposed  on  them  by  their  Licence  of 
Trade  as  a  condition  of  enjoying  its  privileges — 
then  it  is  time  that  England  should  inquire  whether 
these  professions  are  more  than  mockery,  and  the 
fulfilment  of  their  duties  nothing  but  fiction. 

The  Company  have  bound  themselves  under  a 
bond  of  £5,000  to  Her  Majesty,  that  they  will 
convey  felons  to  the  Canadian  Courts  for  trial. 

This  country  did  not  deem  it  wise  or  expedient 
to  invest  a  Company,  whose  dealings  were  shut  out 
from  all  the  world,  with  the  unlimited  power  of  life 
and  death  over  all  in  their  territories  ;  so  a  jurisdic- 
tion was  granted,  imder  Act  of  Parliament,  to  Magis- 
trates, to  be  appointed  throughout  those  countries, 
to  try  cases  of  minor  importance,  but  a  bond  was 
taken  of  the  Company,  that  they  would  transmit 
felons  to  the  Canadian  Courts  for  trial. 


178    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

Will  the  Company  dare  to  assert  that  no 
case  of  felony — that  no  case  of  murder  even — 
has  been  reported  to  their  officers  and  agents, 
throughout  the  whole  of  their  territories,  during 
the  nearly  thirty  years  that  they  have  been 
under  that  bond  ?  And  yet  have  they  ever 
transmitted  one  single  criminal  to  Canada  for 
trial  ? 

On  the  contrary.  Mr.  Alexander  Simpson,  one 
of  the  Company's  best  agents,  tells  us  that  the  Com- 
pany have  "  an  invariable  rule  of  avenging  the 
murder  hy  Indians  of  any  of  its  servants — blood 
FOR  blood,  without  trial  of  any  kind.'^* 

This  is,  indeed,  an  awful  translation  of  the  sig- 
nificant motto  of  the  Company:  "  Pro  pelle  cutem." 

And  Sir  G.  Simpson,  the  Governor  of  the  whole 
country,  admits  the  same  principle,  when  he  says, 
"  whether,  in  matters  of  life  and  death,  or  of  petty 
theft,  the  rule  of  retaliation  is  the  only  standard  of 
equity  which  the  tribes  on  this  coast  are  capable  of 
appreciating."  t 

And  what  reply  do  the  Company  make  to  these 
charges  ?  Nothing  more  than  general  statements, 
for  the  most  part  from  men  who  are  themselves  part 

*  Life  of  Thomas  Simpson,  p.  427. 
t  Sir  G.  Simpson's  Voyage  round  the  World.     Vol.  i.,  p.  194, 


EFFECTS   ON   THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    179 

and  parcel  of,  and  whose  whole  interest  it  is  to 
support,  the  iniquitous  system  which  bestrides  half 
the  continent  of  North  America ;  or  still  vaguer 
opinions,  from  men  who  repeat  what  they  have 
heard  from  the  partners  and  factors  of  the  Company. 

But  they  do  more  than  this.  This  evidence  is 
not  considered  enough ;  therefore  wholesale  fiction 
is  resorted  to.  So  it  is  thought  necessary  that  some 
one  should  assert,  "  that  the  Company  maintain 
several  Medical  Officers  for  difierent  forts ;  and  at 
every  trading  establishment  there  is,  in  fact,  an  Indian 
Hospital,  from  which  the  natives  derive  the  greatest 
benefit,  as  they  resort  thither  in  great  numbers, 
when  suffering  from  age,  infirmities,  or  other 
causes."  * 

When  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  are  reduced 
to  the  necessity  of  putting  forth  such  fabrications  as 
this,  they  must  have  a  rotten  cause  indeed  to 
defend  ;  but  there  are  not  two  honest  men  who  have 
been  in  the  country  who  would  put  their  names  to 
such  an  assertion  as  the  above. 

In  contradiction,  I  shall  merely  quote  a  passage 
from  the  evidence  of  the  five  Orkney  men,  which 
was  mentioned  above,  page  164. 

*  Mr.  M.  Martin's  Hudson's  Bay  Territories.     London.     1848. 
P.  58. 

N    ? 


189     EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

Q.  "  Are  those  Indians  who  may  be  afflicted  with  dis- 
ease or  sickness,  usually  received  into  the  forts  for  the 
purpose  of  being  cured  ?  " 

A.  \.  "  Very  rarely. 

2.  "No. 

3.  "I  never  knew  a  case  but  one,  of  an  Indian 
having  been  taken  into  the  fort  for  the  purpose  of 
medical  assistance.     This  case  was  at  Fort  Simpson. 

4.  "  Not  to  my  knowledge. 

5.  "  Never  knew  of  any." 

Q.  "  Is  it  customary  for  those  who  are  too  old  to  hunt, 
or  who  are  disabled  in  any  way  from  supporting  them- 
selves, to  be  maintained  at  the  forts  ?  " 

A.  1 .  "  There  may  be  some  cases,  but  it  is  not  cus- 
tomary. 

2.  "No. 

3.  "  It  is  not  customary. 

4.  "I  have  never  known  anything  ofthe  kind  done. 

5.  "  Never  knew  anything  of  the  kind  done." 

There  is  one  more  point  respecting  the  relations 
between  the  North  American  Indian,  and  the  Hud- 
son's Bay  Company,  which  it  is  necessary  to  notice, 
and  it  is  far  from  being  the  least  important. 

When  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  received  the 
renewal  of  their  Licence  of  exclusive  Trade,  in  the 
year  1838,  they  entered  into  "  a  covenant  for  per- 
formance of  conditions  and  reservations  contained 
in  the  Crown  grant."  By  this  covenant,  the  Com- 
pany bind  themselves  "  to  transmit  to  the  considera- 
tion and  approval  of  Her  Majesty,  such  rules  and 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    181 

regulations  for  the  management  and  carrying  on  the 
said  fur  trade,  and  the  conduct  of  the  persons  em- 
ployed by  us  therein,  as  have  appeared,  or  may 
appear  to  us,  to  be  most  effectual  for  gradually 
diminishing  and  ultimately  preventing  the  safe  or 
distribution  of  spirituous  liquors  to  the  Indians,  and 
for  promoting  their  moral  and  religious  improve- 
ment.''^ 

Turning  to  the  Licence  of  exclusive  Trade,  we  find 
that  Her  Majesty  did  thereby  require  that  the 
Company  "  should  make  such  regulations  as  might 
appear  to  Her  Majesty  to  be  effectual  for  diminish- 
ing or  preventing  the  sale  or  distribution  of  spirituous 
liquors  to  the  Indians,  and  for  promoting  their  moral 
and  religious  improvement."  And  referring  to  a  still 
earlier  period,  we  find  the  same  language  held  in 
the  Royal  Licence  of  1821,  as  well  as  in  the  Act  of 
Parliament  which  empowered  the  Crown  to  grant 
such  Licence. 

The  moral  and  religious  improvement  of  the 
natives  has  been,  during  the  whole  period  of  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company's  exclusive  power  over  the 
"Indian  Territories,"  a  duty  imposed  upon  them, 
by  Act  of  Parliament  and  by  the  Crown. 

The  necessity  of  thus  publicly  insisting  upon  the 
performance  of  the  first  duty  of  a  Christian,  was  not 


182      EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

wholly  unnecessary,  when  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany had  been  trading  for  nearly  a  century  and  a 
half  among  these  savages,  had  been  making  enor- 
mous profits  from  their  traffic,  and  yet  had  never 
introduced  a  single  minister  of  religion  into  any  one 
of  their  establishments,  or  made  one  solitary  effort 
for  the  improvement  of  the  natives,  who  were 
ministering  so  largely  to  their  wealth. 

The  Company  not  only  did  not  take  any  step  to 
enlighten  and  instruct  the  natives,  but  they  laid 
them  under  the  inevitable  doom  of  Paganism,  as  far 
as  it  was  in  their  power  to  do  so. 

Nothing  can  be  more  melancholy  or  more  humi- 
liating than  the  account  given  of  the  conduct  of  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company,  by  Mr.  Robson,  in  his 
Narrative,  in  1752,  of  a  six  years'  residence  in 
their  territory.  One  story  which  he  relates,  is  an 
awful  record  of  the  principles  on  which  they  dealt 
in  those  days  with  the  natives. 

"  The  instances  of  neglect  and  abuse  of  the  natives 
are  so  gross,  that  they  would  scarcely  gain  credit,  even 
among  civilised  barbarians,  who  never  heard  of  the  mild 
precepts  of  Christianity.  Besides  the  facts  already 
mentioned,  the  following  one  was  well  attested  by  the 
servants  in  the  Bay,  and  was  also  produced  in  evidence 
before  the  Committee. — An  Indian  boy  at  Moose  Fac- 
tory, being  taught  to  read  and  write,  through  the 
humanity  and  indulgence  of  a  Governor  there,  wrote 


EFFECTS   ON    THE   INDIAN   POPULATION.    183 

over  to  the  Company  for  leave  to  come  to  England,  in 
order  that  he  might  be  baptized  ;  but  upon  the  receipt 
of  this  request,  which  any  men  who  had  the  least  sense 
of  religion,  and  the  least  regard  for  the  spiritual  happi- 
ness of  a  fellow-creature,  would  with  joy  have  complied 
with,  an  order  was  sent  to  the  Governor  to  take  the  boy's 
books  from  him,  and  turn  him  out  of  the  factory,  with  an 
express  prohibition  against  any  Indians  being  instructed 
for  the  future.  This  was  the  source  of  much  affliction 
to  the  poor  boy,  who  died  soon  after,  with  a  penitence 
and  devotion  that  would  have  done  honour  to  his 
masters.  But  from  whence  can  such  preposterous  and 
unnatural  behaviour  take  its  rise,  unless  from  the  appre- 
hension that,  if  the  natives  were  properly  instructed  and 
made  converts  to  Christianity,  they  would  all  claim 
the  privileges  of  British  subjects,  and  apply  to  Britain 
to  be  supported  in  them  ?  The  Company,  therefore,  to 
prevent  their  suffering  a  remote  evil  as  traders,  have 
violated  their  indispensable  duty  as  men  and  Christians — 
have  even  sacrificed  their  own  servants  to  their  fear,  and 
lest  the  natives  should  be  instructed  and  reformed,  have 
hitherto  neglected  the  sending  over  a  clergyman  to 
keep  up  a  sense  of  religion  at  any  of  their  factories. 
Why  are  the  Exquimaux  suffered  to  be  driven  from  their 
native  residence,  and  the  shore  of  the  Bay  to  be  left 
desolate,  but  for  the  sake  of  discouraging  all  attempts 
to  establish  a  fishery?  Or,  AVhy  are  animosities  and 
divisions  cherished  among  the  upland  Indians,  but  to 
keep  the  fur  trade  within  a  certain  value,  that  none 
may  be  tempted  to  engage  in  it  to  the  Company's 
disadvantage  ?  "  * 

Mr.  Semple,  who  was  Governor  of  the  Red  River 
settlement,  and  lost  his  life  in  the  savage  struggle 

*  Robson,  &c.,  p.  76. 


184    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

between  the  rival  Companies  about  the  year  1816, 
thus  writes : — 

"  I  have  trodden  the  burnt  ruins  of  houses,  barns,  a 
mill,  a  fort,  and  sharpened  stockades ;  but  none  of  a 
place  of  worship,  even  upon  the  smallest  scale.  I  blush 
to  say  that  over  the  whole  extent  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
territories,  no  such  building  exists.  It  is  surely  high 
time  that  this  foul  reproach  should  be  done  away  from 
among  men  belonging  to  a  Christian  nation.  I  must 
confess  that  I  am  anxious  to  see  the  first  little  Christian 
church,  and  steeple  of  wood,  slowly  rising  among  the 
wilds  ;  and  to  hear  the  sound  of  the  first  Sabbath  bell, 
which  has  tolled  here  since  the  creation."* 

It  was  not  until  the  year  1820,  just  one  hundred 
and  fifty  years  after  the  date  of  the  Charter,  that 
the  Company  bethought  themselves  of  sending  out 
missionaries. 

I  again  repeat,  derelictions  of  duty  in  this  re- 
spect must  be  exposed,  because  they  have  them- 
selves obtruded  their  performances  upon  the  notice 
of  the  public,  and  made  their  missionari/  efforts  one 
of  the  grounds  upon  which  they  demand  public 
sympathy  and  support. 

It  is  necessary,  therefore,  to  repeat  that  until 
compelled  by  their  interests  to  do  so,  (for  1820  was 
the  year  when  they  were  trying  to  obtain  the  first 
Licence  of  exclusive  Trade,)  this  Company  never 

*  Bishop  of  Montreal's  Journal.    London.     1845.     P.  191. 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    185 

for  one  moment  dreamt,  either  of  introducing 
Christianity  amongst  the  Indians,  or  even  of  providing 
for  the  spiritual  instruction  of  their  own  servants. 

In  1820,  however,  it  was  their  interest  to  profess 
religious  zeal ;  and  they  invited  the  Church  Mis- 
sionary Society  to  send  out  two  missionaries.  These 
gentlemen  were  not,  however,  sent  amongst  the 
Indians,  but  were  settled  at  the  Red  River  colony : 
they  received  a  small  allowance  from  the  Company, 
and  were  dignified  by  the  name  of  the  Company's 
Chaplains. 

This  allowance  has,  I  believe,  been  for  many 
years  discontinued.  The  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
at  this  moment  do  not,  as  far  as  I  can  ascertain, 
pay  one  farthing  towards  the  support  of  the  Church 
Missionary  establishment  in  their  territories.  They 
have,  however,  for  the  last  few  years  paid  a  Chaplain 
of  their  own  in  the  Red  River  colony  —  the  only 
one  minister  of  religion  whom  they  maintain  through- 
out the  whole  of  their  wide  dominions. 

This  fact  we  learn  from  the  Bishop  of  Montreal's 
Journal.     His  Lordship  says : — 

"  I  am  as  much  convinced  that  it  is  the  duty  of  the 
English  Government  to  plant  and  perpetuate  the  Church, 
according  to  her  full  organization,  and  to  provide 
standing  institutions  for  training  a  local  body  of  clergy, 
in  the  distant  dominions  of  the  empire,  as  that  it  is  the 


186    EFFECTS   ON   THE   INDIAN   POPULATION. 

duty  of  a  father  to  see  to  the  religious  interests  of  his 
family ;  and  whatever  may  be  the  issue  of  the  Oregon 
boundary  question,  there  is  a  large  accountability  of  this 
kind  in  the  region  for  which  I  am  pleading.     There 

IS  NOT  ONE  CLERGYMAN  OF  THE  ChuRCH  OF  EnG- 
liAND  ON  THE  FURTHER  SIDE  OF  THE  ROCKY  MOUN- 
TAINS. The  Hudson's  Bay  Company  did,  at  one  time, 
maintain  a  Chaplain  at  Fort  Vancouver :  they  have 
ceased  to  do  so.  Within  their  own  proper  territories 
they  have  one — namely,  at  the  Red  River;  so  that  in 
Hudson's  13 ay  itself  there  is  none."* 

The  next  occasion  on  which  a  burst  of  missionary 
zeal  seems  to  have  occurred,  was,  remarkably  enough, 
when  the  time  was  approaching  at  which  the  Licence 
of  exclusive  Trade  must  expire  if  not  renewed. 
Again  the  chance  of  a  public  inquiry  into  what 
they  had  done,  or  were  doing,  rendered  it  advisable 
that  there  should  be  an  appearance  of  missionary 
enterprise. 

In  1836,  Mr.  Beaver  was  appointed  Chaplain  to 
the  Cpmpany,  at  Fort  Vancouver,  on  the  Columbia 
River ;  but  in  1838,  after  the  Licence  had  been 
renewed,  Mr.  Beaver  appears  to  have  left — anything 
but  pleased  with  \hQ  facilities  afforded  him  :  his  post 
has  not  since  been  supplied  up  to  the  present  time. 

The  same  idea  of  trading  upon  a  missionary  cha- 
racter— as  if  the  immortal  souls  of  men  were  to 

*  Bishop  of  Montreal's  Journal,  p.  163. 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.      187 

be  bartered  for  fur  skins — seems  to  have'induced  the 
Company,  at  the  time  of  the  renewal  of  their  Licence 
of  Trade,  to  apply  to  the  Wesleyan  Missionary  So- 
ciety for  assistance  :  and  in  1839,  six  missionaries 
proceeded  to  the  country.     We  have  lately  been 
told,  in  the  Company's  defence,  that  "  five  mission- 
aries, and  one  Indian  assistant  missionary,  are  now 
actually  employed  in  this  sacred  service."*    A  very 
cursory  inspection  of  the  Wesleyan  Reports  is  suflfi- 
cient  to  shew  that  such  a  statement  is  untrue.     The 
same  inspection  will  also  display  the  policy  of  the 
Company,  which  seems  to  be,  to  get  rid  of  mission- 
aries as  soon  as  they  are  no  longer  of  any  use  to  prop 
up  the  monopoly  of  the  fur  trade.     We  find  that  in 
1843,  there  were  six  Wesleyan  missionaries  in  the 
whole  of  the  Company's  territories ;  from  1844  to 
1846,  there  were  Jive  ;   in  1847,  there  were  four  ; 
in   1848,  three  ;  and,  one  having  since  returned, 
there  are,  at  this  moment,  but  two,  of  whom  one  is 
an  Indian  assistant  missionary  ;  so  that  there  is  but 
one  regular  missionary  in  the  whole  of  the  Com- 
pany's territory.     Of  these  men,  some  were,  it  is 
said,  hunted  out  by  the  agents  of  the  Company,  to 
whom  their  presence  was  not  very  agreeable. 

*  Mr.  M.  Martiii'8  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  Territories,  &c. 
P.  122,    See  also,  p.  136. 


188    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

There  are  several  items  in  the  Returns  of  the 
Wesleyan  Missionary  affairs,  which  are  not  very 
intelligible.  For  example  :  at  Lac  la  Pluie,  it  seems, 
Mr.  Jacobs  is  stationed ;  but  he  has  twelve  scholars^ 
and  no  congregation.  Mr.  Randall,  at  the  Rocky 
Mountains,  appears  to  have  been  still  less  success- 
ful ;  for  the  returns  are, — no  scholars,  and  no  con- 
gregation !  whilst  at  Moose  Factory,  where  there  has 
been  no  clergyman  for  two  years,  there  would 
seem  to  be  two  chapels,  Jive  preaching  places,  eighty- 
three  regular  members  of  the  Wesleyan  Connexion, 
one  school,  nineteen  scholars,  and  two  thousand 
attendants  on  public  worship !  Certainly,  if  this  be 
a  true  statement,  and  we  have  no  reason  to  doubt  it, 
it  would  appear  that  the  absence  of  a  minister  has  a 
very  favourable  effect  upon  the  conversion  of  the 
natives :  this  may,  perhaps,  be  the  reason  why  the 
Company  have  been  so  anxious  to  get  rid  of  the 
missionaries  ! 

But  Thomas  Simpson  suggests  another  and  more 
significant  reason.  Writing  to  his  brother  Alex- 
ander, he  says : — 

"  Three  Wesleyan  missionaries  have  come  in  this 
year  from  Lac  la  Pluie  and  the  Saskatchewan,  and  furs 
have  fallen  fifteen  to  twenty  per  cent,  in  price.  Ominous 
signs  these !  saying  plainly,  '  Make  hay  while  the  sun 
shines !'  "* 

*  Life  of  T.  Simpson,  p.  201. 


EFFECTS    ON    THE   INDIAN   POPULATION.    189 

What  can  be  more  forcible  than  this  incidental  pas- 
sage in  a  letter  written  ifrom  the  country,  and  never 
intended  for  the  public  eye  ?     It  speaks  volumes. 

But  the  Company  not  only  get  rid  of  missionaries 
as  soon  as  they  can  do  so  without  dangerous  impopu- 
larity,  but  they  obstruct  them  in  the  performance  of 
their  duties  whilst  in  the  country. 

To  prove  this  fully  to  the  English  public,  as  it  will 
one  day  be  proved,  would  require  an  inspection  of 
the  documents  in  possession  of  the  Missionary 
Societies ;  but  when  private  letters  from  missionaries 
are  quoted  as  evidence  of  the  benevolent  and 
Christian  policy  of  the  Company,  the  following  may 
as  well  be  added  to  the  number.  It  has  been  lately 
received  from  the  Rev.  Mr.  Bamley,  one  of  the 
five  missionaries  who  went  out  to  the  Hudson's 
Bay  territories  immediately  after  the  renewal  of 
the  Licence  of  Trade,  and  of  whom  but  one  is  now 
left  in  the  country.  Any  comment  upon  it  would 
be  superfluous. 

"  My  residence  in  the  Hudson's  Bay  territory  com- 
menced in  June  1840,  and  continued,  with  the  interrup- 
tion of  about  eight  months,  until  September  1847.  My 
letter  of  introduction,  signed  by  the  Governor  of  the 
territory,  and  addressed  '  To  the  Gentlemen  in  charge  of 
the  Honourable  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  Districts  and 
Posts  in  North  America,'  in  one  of  its  paragraphs,  ran 
thus  — '  The  Governor  and  Committee  feel  the  most 


190    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

lively  interest  in  the  success  of  Mr.  Barnley's  mission, 
and  I  have  to  request  you  will  show  to  that  gentleman 
every  personal  kindness  and  attention  in  your  power, 
and  facilitate  by  every  means  the  promotion  of  the  very 
important  and  interesting  service  on  which  he  is  about 
to  enter;' — and,  consequently,  whatsoever  else  I  might 
have  to  endure,  I  had  no  reason  to  anticipate  anything 
but  cordial  co-operation  from  the  officers  of  the  Com- 
pany. 

"  For  the  first  three  years  I  had  no  cause  of  com- 
plaint. The  interpretation  was  in  many  cases  neces- 
sarily inefficient,  and  would  have  been  sometimes  a  total 
failure,  but  for  the  kindness  of  the  wives  of  gentlemen 
in  charge,  who  officiated  for  me ;  but  I  had  the  best  inter- 
preters the  various  posts  afforded  :  the  supply  of  rum  to 
Indians  was  restricted  ;  and  the  Company,  I  believe,  ful- 
filled both  the  spirit  and  the  letter  of  their  agreement 
with  us,  as  far  as  that  fulfilment  was  then  required  of 
them,  and  their  circumstances  allowed. 

"  In  giving,  however,  this  favourable  testimony,  so  far 
as  the  first  three  years  are  concerned,  I  must  say,  that 
in  my  opinion,  we  should  have  been  informed,  before 
commencing  our  labours,  that  the  interpreters  at  some 
of  the  posts  would  be  found  so  inefficient  as  to  leave  us 
dependent  on  the  kindness  of  private  individuals,  and 
reduce  us  to  the  very  unpleasant  necessity  of  taking 
mothers  from  their  family  duties,  that  they  might  be- 
come the  only  available  medium  for  the  communication 
of  Divine  truth. 

"  But,  after  the  period  to  which  I  have  referred,  a 
very  perceptible  change  took  place  :  there  was  no 
longer  that  hearty  concurrence  with  my  views,  and  co- 
operation, which  had  at  first  appeared  so  generally. 
'The  effect  was  as  if  the  gentleman  in  charge  of  the 
Southern  Department  had  discovered  that  he  was  ex- 
pected to  afford  rather  an  external  and  professed  assist- 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    191 

ance,  than  a  real  and  cordial  one ;  and,  under  his  influence, 
others,  both  of  the  gentlemen  and  servants,  became  cool 
and  reluctant  in  those  services  of  which  I  stood  in  need, 
until,  at  length,  the  letter,  as  well  as  the  spirit,  of  the 
Company's  engagement  with  me,  failed. 

"  I  was  prohibited  from  entertaining  to  tea  two 
persons,  members  of  my  congregation,  who  were  about 
to  sail  for  England,  because  I  happened  to  occupy 
apartments  in  the  officer's  residence,  and  told  that  it 
'  could  not  be  made  a  rendezvous  for  the  Company's 
servants  and  their  families.'  A  plan  which  I  had  de- 
vised for  educating  and  training  to  some  acquaintance 
with  agriculture,  native  children,  was  disallowed,  but 
permission  given  me  by  the  Governor  in  Council,  to 
collect  seven  or  eight  boys  from  various  parts  of  the 
surrounding  country,  to  be  clothed,  and  at  the  Com- 
pany's expense.  A  proposal  made  for  forming  a  small 
Indian  village,  near  Moose  Factory,  was  not  acceded 
to  ;  and,  instead,  permission  only  given  to  attempt  the 
location  of  one  or  two  old  men  who  were  no  longer  fit 
for  engaging  in  the  chase,  it  being  very  carefully  and 
distinctly  stated  by  Sir  George  Simpson,  that  the  Com- 
pany would  not  give  them  even  a  spade  towards  com- 
mencing their  new  mode  of  life.  When,  at  length,  a 
young  man  was  found  likely  to  prove  serviceable  as  an 
interpreter,  every  impediment  was  interposed  to  prevent 
his  engaging  in  my  service,  although  a  distinct  under- 
standing existed,  that  neither  for  food,  nor  wages,  would 
he  be  chargeable  to  the  Company.  And  the  pledge 
that  I  should  be  at  liberty  to  train  up  several  boys  for 
future  usefulness,  though  not  withdrawn,  wa.s  treated  as 
if  it  had  never  existed  at  all ;  efforts  being  made  to  pro- 
duce the  impression  on  the  mind  of  my  General  Super- 
intendent, that  I  was,  most  unwarrantably,  expecting 
the  Company  to  depart  from  their  original  compact, 
when  I  attempted  to  add  but  two  of  the  stipulated 
number  to  my  household.       «         *         *         *         » 


192    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

"  At  Moose  Factory,  where  the  resources  were  most 
ample,  and  where  was  the  seat  of  authority  in  the 
Southern  Department  of  Rupert's  Land,  the  hostility  of 
the  Company  (and  not  merely  their  inability  to  aid  me, 
whether  with  convenience  or  inconvenience  to  them- 
selves) was  most  manifest. 

"  The  Indians  were  compelled,  in  opposition  to  their 
convictions  and  desires,  to  labour  on  the  Lord's  day. 

"  They  were  not  permitted  to  purchase  the  food  re- 
quired on  the  Sabbath,  that  they  might  rest  on  that  day 
while  voyaging,  although  there  was  no  necessity  for 
their  proceeding,  and  their  wages  would  have  remained 
the  same.  ******* 

"  At  length,  disappointed,  persecuted,  myself  and 
wife  broken  in  spirit,  and  almost  ruined  in  constitution, 
by  months  of  anxiety  and  suffering,  a  return  to  England 
became  the  only  means  of  escaping  a  premature  grave  ; 
and  we  are  happy  in  fleeing  from  the  iron  hand  of 
oppression,  and  bidding  farewell  to  that  which  had 
proved  to  us  a  land  of  darkness  and  of  sorrow. 

"  From  the  above  statements,  you  will  perceive  that  if 
true  in  some  cases,  it  is  not  in  all,  that  the  Company 
have  furnished  '  the  means  of  conveyance  from  place  to 
place.'  They  have  not  done  so,  at  all  events,  in  the 
particular  case  mentioned.  Nor  would  they  let  me 
have  the  canoe,  lying  idle  as  it  was,  when  they  knew 
that  I  was  prepared  to  meet  '  the  expense.' 

*'  And  equally  far  from  the  truth  is  it,  that  the  mis- 
sionaries have  been  '  boarded,  lodged,  provided  with 
interpreters,  and  servants,  free  of  charge.'  We  cannot 
be  provided  with  that  which  is  not  in  existence  ;  and  at 
many  of  the  posts  there  are  not  even  nominal  inter- 
preters. But  such  as  there  were,  have,  as  I  have  shewn, 
been  refused,  at  Moose  Factory  especially.  *         * 

"  Such  then  is  a  very  brief  statement,  which,  having 
entered  on  the  subject,  I  have  felt  myself  called  upon 
to  furnish ;  and,  lest  it  might  be  thought  that  having 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       193 

left  the  territory  under  circumstances  of  so  unpleasant 
a  character,  I  speak  under  the  influence  of  prejudice,  I 
do  not  think  that  I  shall  be  betraying  confidence,  if  I 
append  two  or  three  brief  extracts  from  the  letter  of  a 
missionary  still  in  the  territory,  and  who  has  not,  that  I 
am  aware  of,  had  any  controversy  with  the  ofticers  of 
the  Company,  and  who  bears  up  patiently,  under  a 
painful  state  of  things,  hoping  for  their  amendment. 

"  '  When  at  York  Factory  last  fall,  (1848,)  a  young 
gentleman  boasted  that  he  had  succeeded  in  starting  the 
Christian  Indians  of  Ross-ville  off  with  the  boats  on  a 
Sunday.  Thus  every  effort  we  make  for  their  moral 
and  spiritual  improvement,  is  frustrated,  and  those  who 
were,  and  still  are,  desirous  of  becoming  Christians,  are 
kept  away.' 

"  He  speaks  of  the  Pagan  Indians  desiring  to  become 
Christians,  but,  being  made  drunk  on  their  arrival  at 
the  Fort,  '  their  good  desires  vanished.' 

"  The  Indians  professing  Christianity,  had  actually 
exchanged  one  keg  of  rum  for  tea  and  sugar,  at  one 
post,  but  successive  offers  of  liquor  betrayed  them  into 
intoxication  at  another. 

"  And  his  sentiments  find  expression  subsequently  thus : 
— '  It  is  very  probable  that  at  no  distant  period  God 
will  graciously  bring  about  a  change,  for  the  land 
moans  because  of  oppression :  for  this  let  our  prayers 
constantly  ascend  to  heaven,  that  His  way  may  be  known 
upon  earth.  His  saving  health  among  all  nations  !' 

"  Torquay,  January  8,  1849." 

Mr.  Beaver,  the  Company's  Chaplain  for  two 
years  at  the  Columbia  River,  gives  evidence  to  the 
same  effect.  In  his  letter  to  the  Committee  of  the 
Aborigines  Protection  Society,  before  quoted,  h« 
writes  thus : — 


194    EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION. 

"  From  time  to  time  I  reported  to  the  Governor  and 
Committee  of  the  Company  in  England,  and  to  the 
Governor  and  Council  of  the  Company  abroad,  the 
result  of  my  observations,  with  a  view  to  a  gradual 
amelioration  of  the  wretched  degradation  with  which  I 
was  surrounded,  by  an  immediate  attempt  at  the  intro- 
duction of  civilization  and  Christianity  among  one  or 
more  of  the  aboriginal  tribes  ;  but  my  earnest  represent- 
ations were  neither  attended  to  nor  acted  upon :  no 
means  were  placed  at  my  disposal  for  carrying  out  the 
plans  which  I  suggested."  * 

Mr.  Ballantyne  acknowledges  and  laments  the 
miserable  deficiency  of  the  Company  in  providing 
for  the  spiritual  instruction  of  those  under  its  rule. 

"  The  almost  total  absence  of  religion  of  any  kind 
among  these  unhappy  natives  is  truly  melancholy.  The 
very  name  of  our  blessed  Saviour  is  almost  unknown  by 
the  hundreds  of  Indians  who  inhabit  the  vast  forests  of 
North  America.  It  is  strange  that  whilst  so  many 
missionaries  have  been  sent  to  the  southern  parts  of 
the  earth,  so  few  should  have  been  sent  to  the  northward. 
There  are  not,  I  believe,  more  than  a  dozen  or  so 
of  Protectant  Clergymen  over  the  whole  wide  northern 
continent ;  and  alas,  even  many  of  that  small  number 
are  slothful  inefficient  men,  and  one  or  two  are  abso- 
lutely unworthy  of  their  high  and  responsible  situation. 

"  For  at  least  a  century  these  North  American  In- 
dians have  hunted  for  the  white  men,  and  poured  annu- 
ally into  Britain  a  copious  stream  of  wealth.  Surely  it 
is  the  duty  of  Christian  Britain  in  return  to  send  out 
faithful  servants  of  God  to  preach  the  Gospel  of  our 
Lord  throughout  their  land."f 

*  Tracts  relative  to  the  Aborigines.     Tract  8,  p.  16. 
t  Ballantyues  Hudson's  Bay.     Second  Edition,    P.  318. 


EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION.       195 

Christian  Britain  did  not,  in  this  instance  at  any 
rate,  altogether  neglect  her  duty.  This  country  did 
impose  on  the  Corporation  to  which  it  committed 
the  government  of  these  regions  the  duty  of  spread- 
ing the  Christian  faith ;  and  they  now  ask  that  Cor- 
poratioa  to  render  an  account  of  its  stewardship. 

Let  no  man  say  that  the  ministers  of  religion  are 
not  wanted  in  these  countries,  and  that  there  is  no 
field  for  their  exertions — ^no  possibility  of  extending 
the  Church  of  God. 

The  Governor  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
said,  in  his  evidence  before  the  Aborigines  Com- 
mittee of  the  House  of  Commons,  in  answer  to  the 
question — 

"  Have  you  found  a  disposition  on  the  part  of  the 
natives  to  receive  moral  and  religious  instruction  ? 

"  A.  Very  great !  We  sent  the  Rev.  Mr.  Beaver 
last  year  across  the  Rocky  Mountains  to  the  Columbia 
district.  There  were  a  couple  of  young  lads  sent  from 
the  Columbia  district,  to  whom  the  names  of  Pelly  and 
Garry*  were  given ;  these  lads  were  revered  by  the 
natives  when  they  returned,  for  the  religious  instructions 

*  Sir  J.  Felly's  information  would  seem  to  be  as  inconect  as  his 
lamentation  is  ill-timed,  if  we  are  to  credit  Sir  G.  Sim{)son,  wbo 
found  the  boy,  Spokan  Garry,  in  tlie  year  1841,  "with  his  superior 
knowledge,'"  "  the  master  spirit,  if  not  the  prime  mover,"  of  "  a  hell 
in  the  wilderness,''  where  the  unfoitunate  natives  were  gambling  over 
a  pack  of  cards  ;  and  who  is  described  as  liaving  relapsed  into  hi^ 
original  barbarism. — Sir  G.  Simpto «'«  Fot/age  round  the  IVorld, 
Vol.  i.,  p.  144. 

o2 


196      EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

hey  were  enabled  to  give :  both  of  them  are,  unfor- 
unately,  since  dead." 

There  is  abundance  of  evidence  to  the  same 
eifect :  there  is  no  want  of  capacity  on  the  part  of 
the  Indian — but  there  is  the  most  awful  callousness 
on  the  part  of  his  master  and  owner,  as  to  what 
becomes  of  him  either  in  this  world  or  the  next.  It 
is  in  the  white  man  alone  that  the  barrier  exists  to 
his  conversion  and  civilization. 

"  It  is  an  observation,"  says  Mr.  Beaver,  in  the  letter 
before  quoted,  "  never  more  truly  exemplified  than  at 
the  Company's  settlements,  that  whenever  the  Gospel 
has  been  carried  among  heathen  nations,  there,  simul- 
taneously, has  vice,  before  unknown,  been  imported ; 
and  that  the  lives  of  the  professors  of  Christianity  are 
the  most  fatal  hindrances  to  its  being  embraced  by 
even  the  most  uncultivated  savages.  The  Indians  with 
whom  I  conversed  were,  for  the  most  part,  intelligent 
and  argumentative,  and  drew  conclusions,  not  from  what 
they  heard,  but  from  what  they  saw ;  and  assuredly  they 
saw  no  recommendation  of  religion  in  the  example  of 
the  generality  of  the  Company's  servants,  with  whom  its 
precepts  seemed  to  be  in  almost  total  abeyance. 

"  One  great  cause  of  the  immorality  at  the  place  where 
I  was  stationed,  and  a  consequent  barrier  to  the  im- 
provement and  conversion  of  the  Indians,  was  the  holding 
of  some  of  them  in  a  state  of  slavery,  by  persons  of  all 
classes  in  the  Company's  service,  and  by  those  who  have 
retired  from  it,  and  become  settlers  on  the  Wallamatte 
■  and  Cowlitze  Rivers,  but  over  whom  the  Company  retain 
authority. 

"The  women  themselves,  who  were  living  with  the 
lower  class  of  the  Company's  servants,  were  much  in 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    INDIAN    POPULATION.    197 

the  condition  of  slaves,  being  purchased  of  their  Indian 
proprietors  or  relations,  and  not  unfrequently  re-sold 
amongst  each  other  by  their  purchasers."  * 

And  Sir  John  Richardson's  opinion  seems  to  differ 

but  little  from  Mr.  Beaver's.      He  says, — 

"  It  might  be  thought  that  the  Crees  have  benefited 
by  their  long  intercourse  with  civilized  nations.  They 
are  capable  of  being,  and,  I  believe,  are  willing  to  be, 
taught,  but  no  pains  have  hitherto  been  taken  to  inform 
their  minds,  and  their  white  acquaintances  seem  in 
general  to  find  it  easier  to  descend  to  the  -Indian  customs 
and  modes  of  thinking,  particularly  with  respect  to 
women,  than  to  attempt  to  raise  the  Indians  to  theirs. 
Indeed,  such  a  lamentable  want  of  morality  has  been 
displayed  by  the  white  traders,  in  their  contests  for  the 
interests  of  their  respective  companies,  that  it  would 
require  a  long  series  of  good  conduct  to  efface  from  the 
minds  of  the  native  population  the  ideas  they  have 
formed  of  thewhite  character."! 

"  The  Metifs,  or,  as  the  Canadians  terra  them,  Bois 
Brules,  are,  upon  the  whole,  a  good-looking  people,  and 
where  the  experiment  has  been  made,  have  shewn  much 
aptness  in  learning,  and  willingness  to  be  taught :  they 
have,  however,  been  sadly  neglected.  The  example  of 
their  fathers  has  released  them  from  the  restraint  imposed 
by  the  Indian  opinion  of  good  and  bad  behaviour,  and, 
generally  speaking,  no  means  have  been  taken  to  fill  the 
void  with  better  principles.  *  *  *  It  is,  however, 
but  justice  to  remark,  that  there  is  a  decided  difference 
in  the  conduct  of  the  children  of  the  Orkneymen  em- 
ployed by  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  and  those  of 
the  Canadian  voyageurs.  Some  trouble  is  occasionally 
bestowed  in  teaching  the  former,  and  it  is  not  thrown 

*  Tracts  relative  to  the  Aborigines.     Tract  8,  p.  18. 
f  Captain  Franklin's  Journal.     Vol. '    "  i  •>«. 


198      EFFECTS  ON  THE  INDIAN  POPULATION. 

away,  but  all  the  good  that  can  be  said  of  the  latter  is, 
that  they  are  not  quite  so  licentious  as  their  fathers 
are."  * 

"  Another  practice  may  also  be  noticed,  as  shewing  the 
state  of  moral  feeling  on  these  subjects  amongst  white 
residents  of  the  fur  countries.  It  was  not  very  uncommon 
amongst  the  Canadian  voyageurs,  for  one  woman  to  be 
common  to,  and  maintained  at,  the  joint  expense  of  two 
men  ;  nor  for  a  voyageur  to  sell  his  wife,  either  for  a 
season,  or  altogether,  for  a  sum  of  money  proportioned  to 
her  beauty  and  good  qualities,  but  always  inferior  to 
the  price  of  a  team  of  dogs."  I 

These  are  the  results  of  locking  up  a  continent  in 
the  hands  of  a  close  and  irresponsible  Corporation. 
'One  argument  for  doing  so,  was  a  tender  regard 
for  the  native  population ;  and  we  awake  as  from  a 
dream,  and  find  the  object  of  our  sympathy  sinking 
under  a  weight  of  misery  to  which  he  was  a  stranger 
until  he  came  in  contact  with  the  blessings  of  civi- 
lization !  Let  the  mind  fully  realize  the  depth  of 
wretchedness  to  which  these  wandering  tribes  are 
doomed  ;  let  it  connect  the  aged  hunter's  lingering 
torments  of  starvation,  with  a  system  by  which  the 
luxury  of  warmth  is  procured  for  a  wealthy  and 
powerful  nation, — and  I  know  not  if  it  be  not  rather 
with  a  feeling  of  pleasure  that  we  hail  the  prospect 
of  the  utter  depopulation  of  a  continent,  as  the  only 
limit  to  our  responsibility  or  our  crime. 

*  Id.     Vol.i.,  p.  167.  fid.    Vol.  i.,  p.  169» 


CHAPTER  VIII. 


OF  THE  RESULTS  OF  THE  HUDSON  S  BAY  COM- 
PANY'S CHARTER  IN  RESPECT  TO  ITS  EFFECTS 
UPON  THE  COLONISTS  WHO  ARE  SUBJECTED 
TO    ITS    INFLUENCE. 

In  pursuance  of  the  plan  laid  down,  the  next  subject 
which  must  occupy  our  attention,  is  the  mode  in 
which  the  powers  claimed  under  the  Charter  have 
worked,  as  regards  the  Colonists  who  are  living 
under  its  influence. 

No  part  of  the  whole  subject  can  be  more  import- 
ant than  this,  because  from  it  we  may  gather  what 
are  likely  to  be  the  results  of  a  policy  which  con- 
templates making  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  the 
agent  of  colonization  throughout  the  greatest  part 
of  our  possessions  in  North  America.  A  short 
account  has  been  given  before,  at  page  54,  of  the 
events  connected  with  the  foundation  of  the  Red 
River  settlement. 

It  is  now  a  matter  of  public  notoriety,  that  the 
inhabitants  of  that  settlement  have  expressed  their 
dissatisfaction  at  the  government  to  which  they  are 


200  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

subject,  and  have  appealed  from  the  power  of  the 
Company  to  that  of  the  Crown. 

It  is  not  within  the  limits  or  the  intention  of  this 
work,  to  detail  the  whole  transaction  of  that  appeal ; 
but  it  may  be  of  use  to  state  some  few  facts,  with 
the  object  of  shewing,  as  briefly  as  possible,  how 
the  government  of  the  Company  has  worked  already, 
and  therefore  how  it  may  be  expected  to  work  in 
future,  should  any  new  colony  be  subjected  to  its 
rule. 

The  principal  part  of  the  population  of  the  Red 
River  is  composed  of  half-breeds,  the  children,  or 
descendants,  of  native  women,  by  the  servants  and 
officers  of  the  Company. 

It  appears,  at  least  this  is  the  statement  made  on 
behalf  of  these  half-breeds,  that  a  few  years  ago 
the  Americans  began  to  put  a  stop  to  the  buffalo 
hunting  which  was  carried  on,  by  the  settlers  at  the 
Red  River,  in  the  plains  south  of  the  boundary  line ; 
and  no  one  was  to  be  permitted  to  hunt  within  the 
American  frontier,  except  citizens  of  the  United 
States.  Hence  the  occupation  and  means  of  sub- 
sistence of  a  considerable  number  of  the  half- 
breeds  and  Indians  of  the  settlement  were  much 
curtailed; 

In  consequence  of  this  new  state  of  affairs,  new 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS.  201 

modes  of  industry  were  contemplated,  in  order  to 
obtain  subsistence  :  the  first  idea  was  to  commence 
an  export  trade  in  tallow  to  England.  Mr.  James 
Sinclair,  it  appears,  was  the  first  person  who 
engaged  in  this  speculation.  He  sent  a  small 
quantity  of  tallow  to  London,  in  one  of  the  Com- 
pany's vessels.  The  adventure  succeeded :  in  the 
following  year,  therefore,  he  sent  a  much  larger 
quantity  to  York  Factory,  for  the  purpose  of  export- 
ation to  England.  For  some  reason  or  other,  the 
Company's  officers  at  York  Factory  refused  to  take 
Mr.  Sinclair's  tallow  on  board  ;  it  remained  for 
nearly  two  years  at  the  factory,  at  the  end  of  which 
time,  Mr.  Sinclair  was  obliged  to  sell  it  to  the 
Company  at  prime  cost. 

In  consequence  of  the  prospects  which  were 
opened  by  Mr.  Sinclair's  first  speculation,  and 
before  the  subsequent  refusal  of  the  Company's 
officers  to  take  his  tallow,  a  second  time,  to  Eng- 
land, a  letter,  signed  by  about  twenty  of  the 
principal  half-breeds  of  the  settlement,  was  ad- 
dressed to  the  Governor  and  Committee  in  London. 

The  following  is  a  copy : — 

"  Red  River  Settlement, 
"Honoured  Sirs,  '^^ December '60,  1843. 

"  Presuming  on  the  liberal   manner  in  which 
your  Honours  met  Mr.  James  Sinclair's  views  of  export- 


202  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS, 

ing  tallow  on  his  own  account  to  England,  in  your 
ships,  at  the  moderate  freight  of  40  francs  per  ton,  We, 
the  undersigned,  have  determined  to  turn  our  attention  to 
collecting  a  quantity  of  the  article  sufficient  to  become 
a  matter  of  some  consideration  in  the  London  market, 
as  well  as  a  source  of  profit  and  employment  to  a  large 
portion  of  the  population  at  the  settlement,  who  arefin- 
capable  of  directing  themselves  to  agricultural  occupa- 
tions, and  whose  orderly  conduct  and  attachment  to  the 
Honourable  Company  so  mateiially  depends  on  a  market 
being  aftbrded  for  the  proceeds  of  the  chase. 

"  After  giving  the  subject  a  careful  consideration,  we 
are  of  opinion  that,  if  your  Honours  would  favour  us  so 
far  as  to  lower  the  very  high  freight  charged  at  present 
on  the  goods  we  import  from  London,  we  can  send  a 
considerable  quantity  of  tallow  to  England,  with  a  small 
profit  to  ourselves  and  considerable  benefit  to  the 
general  prosperity  of  the  settlement.  It  would  be  pre- 
sumptuous in  us  to  pretend  to  a  knowledge  of  the  extra- 
ordinary expense  of  fitting  out  a  ship  for  Hudson's  Bay, 
but  £8  per  ton  is  so  much  more  than  the  freight  ex- 
acted on  goods  sent  to  far  more  distant  parts  of  the 
world,  as  to  induce  us  to  indulge  a  hope  that  your 
Honours  will  take  our  case  into  your  favourable 
consideration. 

"  To  the   Governor, 

Deputy  Governor,  and  Committee, 

of  the  Honourable  Hudson's  Hay  Company." 

To  this  letter,  it  appears,  no  answer  was  returned. 

If  the  above  be  facts,  there  cannot  be  anything 
more  contrary  to  the  truth,  than  the  statement  made 
by   Mr.  T.  Simpson,   and   quoted  at  page  19  in 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS.  203 

Mr.  M.  Martin's  book,  that,  "the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  have  long  endeavoured,  by  rewards  and 
arguments,  to  excite  an  exportation  of  tallow,  hides, 
wool,  &c.,  to  England ;  but  the  long  and  dangerous 
navigation  to  Hudson  Bay,  and  the  habits  of  the 
half-bred  race,  who  form  the  mass  of  the  people, 
and  generally  prefer  chasing  the  buffalo  to  agricul- 
ture or  regular  industry,  have  rendered  their  efforts 
ineffectual." 

This  opinion  of  Mr.  T.  Simpson,  indeed,  in  a 
measure,  contradicts  itself:  one  does  not  see  how 
the  love  of  chasing  the  baffalo,  by  which  the  tallow 
was  to  be  obtained,  can  be  given  as  a  reason  why 
no  tallow  should  be  exported. 

And  that  the  length  or  difficulty  of  the  voyage 
to  Hudson's  Bay  need  form  no  obstacle  to  such  a 
trade,  is  manifest  from  Sir  J.  H.  Felly's  own  letter 
to  Lord  Glenelg,  (Parliamentary  paper.  May  8, 1842, 
No.  547,)  in  which  the  advantages  to  be  gained 
from  such  an  export  trade  are  strongly  dwelt  upon. 

The  settlers,  on  the  other  hand,  complain,  that 
every  endeavour  which  they  have  made  to  better  their 
condition,  by  opening  a  traffic  with  England,  has 
been  frustrated  by  the  tyrannical  regulations  of  the 
Company, — ^by  the  enormous  freights  demanded, — 
and  by  the  jealousy  with  which  the  advancement 


204  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

and  prosperity  of  the  native   population  has  ever 
been  regarded. 

Another  fact  must  here  be  noticed,  which  had 
some  influence  in  increasing  the  discontent  of  the 
settlers. 

The  Company  had  begun,  before  this  time,  to 
employ  some  of  the  leading  half-breeds  as  middle- 
men in  the  fur  trade ;  paying  the  middleman  in 
money  or  commerce,  and  receiving  furs  in  exchange, 
whilst  the  middleman  undertook  the  trouble  of  pro- 
curing the  furs  from  the  natives,  of  course  with  some 
advantage  to  himself 

The  half-breeds,  by  these  means,  became  practi- 
cally acquainted  with  the  enormous  profits  which 
were  being  realized  upon  the  actual  capital  em- 
ployed ;  and  thus  a  strong  temptation  was  afforded 
them,  to  engage  in  the  fur  trade  on  their  own 
account,  and  as  they  could  not  export  furs  to 
England,  to  send  them  into  the  American  territory. 

The  question  was  raised  at  once  in  the  minds  of 
the  half-breeds  and  natives,  how  far  the  privileges  of 
the  Company  could  restrain  the  native  inhabitants 
of  the  soil,  or  their  descendants,  from  obtaining  the 
fiirs,  the  natural  produce  of  the  coimtry  of  their 
forefathers,  and  disposing  of  them  in  any  manner 
they  chose. 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS.  205 

It  would  appear  that  the  government  of  the 
settlement  had  been  such,  up  to  this  time,  that  there 
was  no  very  strong  inclination  on  the  part  of  the 
inhabitants  to  considt  the  interests,  or  jield  to  the 
wishes,  of  the  Company :  and  so,  in  a  short  time,  a 
traflBc,  illicit  as  the  Company  assert,  began  between 
some  few  of  the  half-breeds  of  the  Red  River  and 
the  Americans. 

But  the  settlers  themselves  do  not  appear  to  have 
considered  this  traffic  illegal.  They  did  not  want  to 
smuggle  the  furs  out  of  the  country ;  on  the  contrary, 
they  openly  asserted  their  rights.  They  said  that  no 
Charter  could  deprive  them  of  that  which  was  their 
birthrights — the  right  to  hunt  the  wild  animals 
on  the  lands  on  which  their  fathers  hunted  before 
them,  or  to  purchase  them  when  hunted  by  their 
Indian  friends  or  relatives :  and,  having  obtained 
the  furs,  they  asserted  that  nothing  but  injustice  and 
violence  could  compel  them  to  dispose  of  the  labour 
of  their  hands,  or  of  the  results  of  skill  and  risk  in 
barter,  to  one  Company  alone,  and  at  whatever 
price  that  Company  chose  to  offer. 

They  do  not  seem  to  have  urged  the  fact  that 
they  were  British  subjects,  and,  as  such,  to  have 
appealed  against  a  gross  violation  of  British  law  by 


206  EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

the  enforcement  of  a  monopoly ;  but  they  stood 
upon  their  claims  as  the  descendants  of  the  native 
Indian,  and  denied  that  any  right,  but  that  of 
might,  could  deprive  them  of  their  hereditary  pro- 
perty in  the  wild  animals  of  their  ancient  forests 
and  prairies. 

They,  therefore,  addressed  the  following  letter 
to  the  Governor  of  Assimboin  ;  and  it  must  be 
admitted  that  the  difficulties  started  by  some  of 
their  queries,  are  such  as  cannot  be  disposed  of  at 
once,  or  pooh-poohed  as  irrational  and  absurd. 

"  Red  River  Settlement, 
"Sir,  "  August  29,  1845. 

"  Having  at  this  moment  a  veiy  strong  belief 
that  we,  as  natives  of  this  country,  and  as  half-breeds, 
have  the  right  to  hunt  furs  in  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany's territories,  whenever  we  think  proper,  and  again 
sell  those  furs  to  the  highest  bidder ;  likewise  having  a 
doubt  that  natives  of  this  country  can  be  prevented 
from  trading  and  trafficking  with  one  another ;  we  would 
wish  to  have  your  opinion  on  the  subject,  lest  we  should 
commit  ourselves  by  doing  anything  in  opposition 
either  to  the  laws  of  England  or  the  Plonourable  Com- 
pany's privileges,  and  therefore  lay  before  you,  as 
Governor  of  Red  River  settlement,  a  few  queries, 
which  we  beg  you  will  answer  in  course. 

"  Query  1.  Has  a  half-breed,  a  settler,  the  right  to 
hunt  furs  in  this  country  ? 

"  2.  Has  a  native  of  this  country  (not  an  Indian)  a 
right  to  hunt  furs  ? 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS.  207 

"3.  If  a  half-breed  has  the  right  to  hunt  furs,  can 
lie  hire  other  half-breeds  for  the  purpose  of  hunting 
furs? 

"4.  Can  a  half-breed  sell  his  furs  to  any  'person  he 
pleases  ? 

"  5.  Is  a  half-breed  obliged  to  sell  his  furs  to  the 
Hudson's  Bay  C  )nipany  at  whatever  price  the  Company 
may  think  proper  to  give  him  ? 

"  6.  Can  a  half-breed  receive  any  furs,  as  a  present, 
from  ai  Indian,  a  relative  of  his? 

"■  7.  Can  a  half-breed  hire  any  of  his  Indian  relatives 
to  hunt  furs  for  1  i  n  ? 

"  ».  Can  a  half-breed  trade  furs  from  another  half- 
breed,  in,  or  out  of,  the  settlement  ? 

"  9.  Can  a  half-breed  trade  furs  from  an  Indian,  in, 
or  out  of,  the  settlement? 

"  10.  With  regard  to  trading,  or  hunting  furs,  have 
the  half-breefls,  or  natives  of  European  origin,  any 
rights  or  privileges  over  Europeans  ? 

"11.  A  settler,  having  purchased  lands  from  Lord 
Selkirk,  or  even  from  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
without  any  conditions  attached  to  them,  or  without 
having  signed  any  bond,  deed,  or  instrument  whatever, 
whereby  he  might  have  willed  away  his  right  to  trade 
furs,  can  he  be  prevented  from  trading  furs  in  the  set- 
tlement with  settlers,  or  even  out  of  the  settlement  ? 

"  12.  Are  tiie  limits  of  the  settlement  defined  by  the 
Municipal  Law,  Selkirk  Grant,  or  Indian  Sale? 

"  13.  If  a  person  cannot  trade  furs,  either  in,  or  out 
of,  the  settlement,  can  he  purchase  them  for  his  own 
and  family  use,  and  in  what  quantity  ? 

"  14.  Having  never  seen  any  official  statements,  nor 
known,  but  by  report,  that  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
has  peculiar  privileges  over  British  subjects,  natives,  and 
half-breeds,  resident  in  the  settlement,  we  woidd  wisli 


208  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

to  know  what  those  privileges  are,  and  the  penalties 
attached  to  the  infringement  of  the  same. 

"  We  remain,  your  humble  Servants, 

"  James  Sinclair.  William  Bird. 

Baptist  La  Roque.  Peter  Garioch. 

Thomas  Logan.  Henry  Cook. 

John  Dease.  John  Spence. 

Alexis  Gaulat.  John  Anderson. 

Louis   Letende   de  Thomas  M'Dermot. 

Batoche.  Adall  Trottier. 

William  M'Millan.  Charles  Hole, 

Antoine  Morran.  Joseph  Monkman. 

Bat.  Wilkie.  Baptist  Farman. 
John  Vincent. 

"  Alexander  Christie,  Esq., 

Governor  of  Red  River  Settlement." 

To  this  letter,  Mr.  Christie  returned  the  following 

answer : — • 

"  Fort  Garry, 
"Gentlemen,  "  September  5,  1845. 

"  I  received  your  letter  of  the  29th  ultimo,  on  the 
evening  of  the  3rd  instant,  and  I  am  sure  that  the  solemn 
and  important  proceedings  in  which  I  was  yesterday  en- 
gaged, will  form  a  sufficient  apology  for  my  having  allowed 
a  day  to  pass  without  noticing  your  communication. 

"  However  unusual  it  may  be  for  the  Rulers  of  any 
country  to  answer  legal  inquiries  in  any  other  way  than 
through  the  judicial  tribunals  which  can  alone  authori- 
tatively decide  any  point  of  law,  I  shall,  on  this  par- 
ticular occasion,  overlook  all  those  considerations  which 
might  otherwise  prompt  me  to  decline,   with  all  due 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS.  209 

courtesy,  the  discussion  of  your  letter ;  and  I  am  the 
rather  induced  to  adopt  this  course  by  your  avowal,  for 
which  I  am  bound  to  give  you  full  credit,  that  you  are 
actuated  by  an  unwillingness  to  do  anything  in  opposition 
either  to  the  laws  of  England,  or  to  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company's  privileges. 

"  Your  first  nine  queries,  as  well  as  the  body  of  your 
letter,  are  grounded  on  the  supposition,  that  the  half- 
breeds  possess  certain  privileges  over  their  fellow-citi- 
zens, who  have  not  been  born  in  the  country.  Now, 
as  British  subjects,  the  half-breeds  have  clearly  the  same 
rights  in  Scotland  or  in  England  as  any  person  born  in 
Great  Britain,  and  your  own  sense  of  justice  will  at 
once  see  how  unreasonable  it  would  be  to  place  Eng- 
lishmen and  Scotchmen  on  a  less  favourable  footing  in 
Rupert's  Land  than  yourselves.  Your  supposition  fur- 
ther seems  to  draw  a  distinction  between  half-breeds 
and  persons  born  in  the  country  of  European  parentage, 
and  to  men  of  your  intelligence  I  need  not  say  that  this 
distinction  is  still  more  unreasonable  than  the  other. 

"  Your  tenth  query  is  fully  answered  in  these  obser- 
vations on  your  first  nine  queries. 

"  Your  eleventh  query  assumes  that  any  purchaser 
of  lands  would  have  the  right  to  trade  furs  if  he  had  not 
'  willed'  it  away  by  assenting  to  any  restiictive  condi- 
tion. Such  an  assumption,  of  course,  is  admissible  of 
itself,  and  inconsistent  even  with  your  own  general  views ; 
the  conditions  of  tenure,  which,  by  the  bye,  have  always 
been  well  understood  to  prohibit  any  infraction  of  the 
Company's  privileges,  are  intended  not  to  bind  the 
individual  who  is  already  bound  by  the  fundamental 
law  of  the  country,  but  merely  to  secure  his  lands  as  a 
special  guarantee  for  the  due  discharge  of  such,  his 
essential  obligation. 

"  After  what  has  just  been  said,  your  twelfth  query 
becomes  wholly  unimportant. 


210  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

"  Your  fourteenth  query,  which  comprises  your  thir- 
teenth, and,  in  fact,  also  all  the  queries  that  you  either 
have,  or  could  have,  proposed,  requests  me  to  enumerate 
the  peculiar  privileges  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
on  the  alleged  ground  that  you  know  them  only  through 
report.  Considering  that  you  have  the  means  of  seeing 
the  Charter  and  the  Land  Deed,  and  such  enactments  of 
the  Council  of  Rupert's  Land  as  concern  yourselves  and 
your  fellow-citizens, — and  considering  further,  that,  in 
point  of  fact,  some  of  you  have  seen  them,  I  cannot 
admit  that  you  require  information  to  the  extent  which 
you  profess  ;  and  even  if  you  did  require  it,  I  do  not 
think  that  I  could  offer  you  anything  more  clear  than 
the  documents  themselves  are,  on  which  my  enumera- 
tions of  the  Company's  rights  must  be  based.  If,  how- 
ever, any  individual  among  you,  or  among  your  fellow- 
citizens,  should  at  any  time  feel  himself  embarrassed  in 
any  honest  pursuit,  by  legal  doubts,  I  shall  have  much 
pleasure  in  affording  him  a  personal  interview. 
"  I  am.  Gentlemen, 
"  Your  most  obedient  Servant, 
(Signed)         *'  Alexander  Christie, 

"  Governor  of  Assimboia." 
^^  Messrs.  James  Sinclair,  JBt.  La  Roque, 
Thomas  Logan,  and  others." 

We  may  mention  here,  in  passing,  that  "  the 
solemn  and  important  proceedings"  in  which  the 
Government  had  been  engaged  the  day  before,  con- 
sisted of  "  hanging  an  Indian.'^  Of  the  legality  of 
this  proceeding,  it  will  be  necessary  to  make  some 
observations  presently. 

The  Company,  however,  did  not  remain  satisfied 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS.  211 

with  this  placid  and  amiable  reply  to  the  questions 
of  the  memorialists ;  nor  did  they  argue  the  matter 
theoretically  with  their  subjects.  Strong  measures 
were  at  once  adopted  to  put  an  end  to  the  free  trade 
in  furs  which  was  springing  up,  and  the  practice  of 
employing  middlemen  was  discontinued,  as  having 
tended  to  produce  it. 

The  following  are  extracted  from  the  Minutes  of 
the  Council  of  Rupert's  Land,  passed  at  their 
Annual  Meeting,  at  the  Red  River,  in  1845. 

Extract  from  Minutes  of  a  Meeting  of  the  Governor  and 
Council  of  Rupert! s  Land,  held  at  the  Red  River 
Settlement,  June  10,  1845. 

"  Resolved — 1st.  That,  once  in  every  year,  any  British 
subject,  if  an  actual  resident  and  not  a  fur  trafficker, 
may  import,  whether  from  London  or  from  St  Peters, 
stores  free  of  any  duty  now  about  to  be  imposed,  on 
declaring  truly,  that  he  has  imported  them  at  his  own 
risk. 

"  2ndly.'That,  once  in  every  year,  any  British  subject, 
if  qualified  as  before,  may  exempt  from  duty  as  before, 
imports  of  the  local  value  of  ten  pounds,  on  declaring 
truly,  that  they  are  intended  exclusively  to  be  used  by 
himself  within  Red  Kiver  settlement,  and  have  been 
purchased  with  certain  specified  productions  or  manu- 
factures 6f  the  aforesaid  settlement,  exported  in  the 
same  season,  or  by  the  latest  vessel,  at  his  own  risk. 

•'  3rdly.  That,  once  in  every  year,  any  British  subject, 
if  qualified  as  before,  who  may  have  personally  accom- 
panied both  his  exports  and  imports,  as  defined  in  the 
preceding  Resolution,  may  exempt  from  duty  as  before, 

p2 


212  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

imports  of  the  local  value  of  £50,  on  declaring  truly,  that 
they  are  either  to  be  consumed  by  himself,  or  to  be  sold 
by  himself  to  actual  consumers  within  the  aforesaid 
settlement,  and  have  been  purchased  with  certain  speci- 
fied productions  or  manufactures  of  the  settleraent,'carried 
away  by  himself  in  the  same  season,  or  by  the  latest 
vessel,  at  his  own  risk. 

"  4thly.  That  all  other  imports  from  the  United  King- 
dom for  the  aforesaid  settlement,  shall,  before  delivery, 
pay  at  York  Factory  a  duty  of  20  per  cent,  on  their 
prime  cost :  provided,  however,  that  the  Governor  of 
the  settlement  be  hereby  authorised  to  exempt  from  the 
same,  all  such  importers  as  may  from  year  to  year  be 
reasonably  believed  by  him  to  have  neither  trafficked  in 
furs  themselves  since  the  8th  day  of  December,  1844, 
nor  enabled  others  to  do  so,  by  illegally  or  improperly 
supplying  them  with  trading  articles  of  any  description. 

"  5thly.  That  all  other  imports  from  any  part  of  the 
United  States,  shall  pay  all  duties  payable  under  the 
provisions  of  5  &  6  Vict.,  cap.  49,  the  Imperial  Statute 
for  regulating  the  foreign  trade  of  the  British  posses- 
sions in  North  America :  provided,  however,  that  the 
Governor-in-Chief,  or,  in  his  absence,  the  President  of 
the  Council,  may  so  modify  the  machineiy  of  the  said 
Act  of  Parliament,  as  to  adapt  the  same  to  the  circum- 
stances of  the  country. 

"  7thly.  That  henceforward,  no  goods  shall  be  delivered 
at  York  Factory,  to  any  but  persons  duly  licensed  to 
freight  the  same ;  such  licenses  being  given  only  in 
those  cases  in  which  no  fur  trafficker  may  have  any 
interest,  direct  or  indirect. 

"  8thly.  That  any  intoxicating  drink,  if  found  in  a  fur 
trafficker's  possession,  beyond  the  limits  of  the  aforesaid 
settlement,  may  be  seized  and  destroyed  by  any  person 
on  the  spot. 

"  Whereas  the  intervention  of  middlemen  is  alike  in- 


EFFECTS   ON   THE    COLONISTS.  213 

jurious  to  the  Honourable  Company  and  to  the  people ; 
it  is  resolved — 

"  9thly.  That,  henceforward,  furs  shall  be  purchased 
from  none  but  the  actual  hunters  of  the  same." 

^^  Fort  Garry,  July  10,  1845. 

Copy  of  Licence  referred  to  in  Resolution  7. 

"  On  behalf  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  I  hereby 
license  A.  B.  to  trade,  and  also  ratify  his  having  traded, 
in  English  goods,  within  the  limits  of  Red  River  settle- 
ment. This  ratification  and  this  Licence  to  be  null  and 
void,  from  the  beginning,  in  the  event  of  his  hereafter 
trafficking  in  furs,  or  generally  of  his  usurping  any 
whatever  of  all  the  privileges  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company." 

To  comment  upon  every  article  in  these  Minutes 
as  they  deserve,  would  occupy  a  longer  time  than 
can  be  here  aflPorded.  It  is  quite  impossible  for  any 
one  to  believe  that  a  colony  can  flourish  under  such 
a  system  of  interference  with  trade.  Trade  is 
absolutely  forbidden,  except  once  a  year,  and  to 
licensed  persons ;  and  all  privilege  to  trade  is  denied 
to  persons  who  interfere  with  the  Company's  claim 
of  exclusive  traflBc  in  furs. 

But  the  Company  do  not  appear  to  have  trusted 
to  paper  deeds  to  enforce  their  authority. 

They  were  not  even  content  with  inflicting  fines, 
under  the  form  of  a  hostile  tariff;  but  as  the  half- 
breeds  say,  some  of  the  fur  traders  were  imprisoned, 
and  all  the  goods  and  articles  of  exchange  belonging 


214  EFFECTS   ON    THE  COLONISTS. 

to  those  who  were  suspected  of  an  intention  to  traffic 
in  fors,  were  seized  and  confiscated. 

But  another,  and  even  more  serious  attack  was 
made  on  the  privileges  of  the  settlers. 

The  Company  being,  under  their  Charter,  nomi- 
nal owners  of  the  soil,  dispose  of  it  to  the  colonists 
in  any  manner  they  think  best.  A  portion  of  the 
land  in  the  colony  is  held  from  Lord  Selkirk,  who 
first  founded  the  settlement. 

Now,  however,  the  Company  drew  up  a  new  Land 
Deed,  which  all  were  compelled  to  sign  who  wished 
to  hold  any  land  in  the  settlement. 

The  following  is  a  copy  of  this  document : — 

"  This  Indenture,  made  the         day  of  ,  in  the 

year  of  our  Lord  One  Thousand  Eight  Hundred  and 
Forty  ,  between  the  Governor  and  Company  of 
Adventurers  of  England,  trading  into  Hudson's  Bay,  of 
the  one  part,  and  of 

of  the  other  part. 

"  Whereas  the  said  is 

desirous  of  becoming  a  settler  upon  the  land  herein- 
after described,  or  intended  so  to  be,  being  certain  part 
of  a  territory  in  North  America,  belonging  to  the  said 
Governor  and  Company,  and  held  under  the  Crown  by 
Charter:  Now,  therefore,  this  Indenture  witnesseth, 
that  in  consideration  of  , 

and  in  consideration  also  of  the  covenants  hereinafter 
contained  on  the  part  of  the  said  , 

they,  the  said  Governor  and  Company,  do  hereby  grant, 
demise,  and  lease  unto  the  said  , 


EFFECTS   ON   THE   COLONISTS.  215 

his  executors,  administrators,  and  assigns,  all  that  piece 
or  parcel  of  land,  being  of  Lot  No.       , 

as  described  at  large  in  the  Official  Survey  of  Red 
River  settlement,  and  containing,  more  or  less, 
English  acres, 

with  the  necessary  appurtenances  thereto :  to  have  and 
to  hold  the  said  piece  or  parcel  of  land  hereby  demised, 
or  intended  so  to  be,  and  every  part  thereof,  with  the 
appurtenances  unto  the  said  , 

his  executors,  administrators,  and  assigns,  from  the 
day  next  before  the  day  of  the  date  of  these  presents, 
and  for  and  during  and  unto  the  full  term  of  one 
thousand  years,  thence  next  ensuing ;  yielding  and 
paying  therefor,  yearly  and  every  year,  during  the  said 
term,  and  upon  the  Michaelmas  Day  in  each  year,  the 
rent  or  sum  of  one  peppercorn,  the  first  payment 
whereof  to  be  made  upon  the  twenty-ninth  day  of 
September  next  ensuing  the  date  hereof.  And  the  said 
,  for  himself,  his  heirs,  executors,  and 
administrators,  doth  hereby  covenant  and  agree  with  the 
said  Governor  and  Company,  in  manner  following  ;  that 
is  to  say :  that  he  the  said  shall  or  will, 

within  forty  days  from  the  date  hereof,  settle  and  esta- 
blish himself  or  themselves,  and  continue  to  reside  upon 
the  said  hereby  demised  land,  and  shall  or  will,  within 
five  years  from  the  date  of  these  presents,  bring,  or  cause 
or  procure  to  be  brought  into  a  state  of  cultivation,  one 
tenth  part  of  the  said  hereby  demisefl  land,  and  thence- 
forth continue  the  same  in  such  state.  And  that,  during 
the  said  term,  he  the  said  ,  his  executors, 

administrators,  and  assigns,  shall  not,  directly  or  indi- 
rectly, mediately  or  immediately,  violate  or  evade  any 
of  the  chartered  or  licensed  privileges  of  the  said  Go- 
vernor and  Company,  or  any  restrictions  on  trading  or 
iiealing  with  Indians  or  others,  which  have  been  or  may 
be  imposed  by  the  said  Governor  and  Company,  or  by  any 


216  EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

other  competent  authority,  or  in  any  way  enable  any  per- 
son or  persons  to  violate  or  evade,  or  to  persevere  in  vio- 
lating or  evading  the  same,  and  in  short  shall  obey  all  such 
laws  and  regulations  as  within  the  said  settlement  now 
are,  or  hereafter  may  be,  in  force,  for  preventing  the 
distillation  of  spirits,  for  preserving  internal  peace,  for 
repelling  foreign  aggression,  for  making  and  repairing 
roads  and  bridges,  and  for  encouraging  and  promoting 
general  education  and  religious  instniction.  And  that 
he  the  said  ,  his  executors, 

administrators,  or  assigns,  shall  or  will,  from  time  to 
time,  and  at  all  times  during  the  said  term,  contribute 
in  a  due  proportion  to  the  expenses  of  all  public  esta- 
blishments, whether  of  an  ecclesiastical,  civil,  military, 
or  other  nature,  including  therein  the  maintenance  of  the 
clergy,  the  building  and  endowment  of  schools,  which 
are,  or  shall  or  may  be  formed  under  the  authority  of 
the  Charter  or  Charters  hereinbefore  referred  to.  And 
also  that  he  or  they,  at  proper  seasons  in  every  year,  and  in 
or  towards  the  making  and  repairing  of  such  roads  high- 
ways as  lie  within  miles  from  the  said  hereby  demised 
premises,  shall  and  will  employ  himself  or  themselves,  and 
his  or  their  servants,  horses,  cattle,  carts,  and  carriages, 
and  other  necessary  things  for  that  purpose,  where  and 
when  required  so  to  do  by  the  surveyor  or  overseer  for  the 
time  being,  appointed  for  the  making  and  amending 
public  roads,  bridges,  and  highways,  within  such  limits 
as  aforesaid ;  such  requisition,  nevertheless,  in  point  of 
time,  not  to  exceed  six  days  in  each  year,  computed  day 
by  day,  and  from  Michaelmas  to  Michaelmas. 

"  And  also,  that  he  the  said  , 

his  executors,  administrators,  and  assigns  shall  not, 
nor  will,  without  the  licence  or  consent  of  the  said 
Governor  and  Company  for  that  purpose  first  ob- 
tained, carry  on  or  establish,  or  attempt  to  carry  on 
or  establish,  in  any  part  of  North  America,  any  trade  or 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS.  217 

traffic  in  or  relating  to  any  kind  of  skins,  fiirs,  peltry,  or 
dressed  leather,  nor  in  any  manner,  directly  or  indirectly, 
aid  or  abet  any  person  or  persons  in  carrying  on  such 
trade  or  traffic  ;  nor  shall  nor  will,  at  any  time  or  times 
during  the  said  term,  distil,  or  cause  or  procure  to  be 
distilled,  spirituous  liquors  of  any  nature  or  kind  soever, 
either  upon  the  land  hereby  demised,  or  within  any  other 
part  of  the  territories  belonging  to  the  said  Governor 
and  Company  in  North  America ;  nor  during  the  said 
term,  knowingly  suffer  or  permit  any  other  person  or 
persons  whomsoever,  to  distil  any  such  liquors  upon  the 
said  demised  land  or  any  part  thereof. 

"  And  the  said  ,  for  himself,  his 

heirs,  executors,  and  administrators,  doth  hereby  fur- 
ther covenant  with  the  said  Governor  and  Company, 
and  their  successors,  that  he  the  said 

his  executors,  administrators,  and  assigns, 
will  use  his  and  their  best  endeavours  to  maintain  the 
defence  and  internal  peace  of  the  territories  of  the  said 
Governor  and  Company  in  North  America,  and  shall 
and  will  be  chargeable  therewith  according  to  such 
laws  and  regulations  as  are  now  in  force  in  respect  of 
the  same  territories,  or  as  shall  from  time  to  time  be 
made  by  competent  authority;  and  also  that  he  the 
said  ,  his  executors, 

administrators,  or  assigns,  shall  not  nor  will,  at  any 
time  or  times  during  the  said  term,  or  by  any  direct  or 
indirect,  mediate  or  immediate,  manner,  ways,  or  means, 
infringe  or  violate,  or  set  about  or  attempt  to  infringe  or 
violate,  or  aid,  assist,  or  abet,  or  set  about  or  attempt  to 
aid,  assist,  or  abet,  or  supply  with  spirituous  liquors,  trad- 
ing goods,  provisions,  or  other  necessaries,  any  person  or 
persons  whomsoever,  corporate  or  incorporate,  or  any 
Prince,  Power,  Potentate,  or  State  whatsoever,  who 
shall  infringe  or  violate,  or  who  shall  set  about  or 
attempt  to  infringe  or  violate,  the  exclusive  rights, 
powers,    privileges,    and    immunities,    of  commerce, 


218  EFFECTS    ON    THE  COLONISTS. 

trade,  and  traffic,  or  all  or  any  other  of  the  exclusive 
rights,  powers,  privileges,  and  immunities,  of  or  belong- 
ing or  in  any  wise  appertaining  to,  or  held,  used,  or 
enjoyed  by  the  said  Governor  and  Company,  and  their 
successors  under  their  Charter  or  Charters,  without  the 
licence  or  consent  of  the  said  Governor  and  Company, 
and  their  successors  for  the  time  being,  first  had  and 
obtained.     And  lastly,  that  he  the  said 

,  his  executors,  administrators,  or  assigns, 
shall  not,  nor  will,  at  any  time  during  the  said  term, 
underlet,  or  assign,  or  otherwise  alienate,  or  dispose,  or 
part  with,  the  actual  possession  of  the  said  land  hereby 
demised,  or  any  part  thereof,  for  all  or  any  part  of  the 
said  term,  or  any  interest  derived  under  the  same, 
without  the  consent  in  writing  of  the  said  Governor  and 
Company  for  the  time  being  first  had  and  obtained. 
And  also,  that  he  the  said  , 

his  executors,  administrators,  or  assigns,  shall  or  will, 
within  six  calendar  months  from  the  date  hereof,  as  to 
these  presents,  and  within  six  calendar  months,  from  the 
date  of  each  respective  assignment  or  under-lease  to  be 
made  under  or  through  these  presents  ;  and  with  respect 
to  each  such  assignment  and  under-lease  respectively, 
cause  these  presents  and  every  such  assignment  or  under- 
lease, when  made,  to  be  registered  in  the  Register  of  the 
said  territories  in  North  America,  or  of  the  district  in 
which  the  said  hereby  demised  land  shall  be  situate,  and 
wherever  such  Register  shall  be  kept  at  the  time  :  pro- 
vided always,  nevertheless,  and  it  is  hereby  declared  and 
agreed,  that  if  the  said  , 

his  executors,  administrators,  or  assigns,  shall  not  in  all 
things  well  and  truly  observe  and  perform  all  and  every 
the  covenants  and  agreements  herein  contained,  on  his 
and  their  behalf  to  be  observed  and  performed,  then, 
and  in  either  of  such  cases,  and  either  upon  or  after  the 
first  breach,  or  any  subsequent  breach  or  breaches  of 
covenant,  and  as  to  any  subsequent  breach  or  breaches, 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS.  219 

notwithstanding  there  may  have  been  any  waiver  or 
waivers,  or  supposed  waiver  or  waivers  thereof,  by  the 
acceptance  of  rent  or  otherwise,  it  shall  or  may  be  law- 
ful to  and  for  the  said  Governor  and  Company,  and 
their  successors  or  assigns,  to  enter  into  and  upon  the 
said  hereby  demised  premises,  or  any  part  thereof,  in  the 
name  of  the  whole  thereof,  and  to  have,  hold,  retain, 
and  enjoy  the  same  as  in  their  former  state ;  and  also  to 
put  an  end  to,  and  determine,  the  said  term  of  one  thou- 
sand years,  or  so  much  thereof  as  shall  be  then  unex- 
pired ;  and  all  and  every  person  or  persons  then  occupying 
the  same  premises,  or  claiming  title  thereto,  to  put  out 
and  remove,  anything  hereinbefore  contained  to  the  con- 
trary notwithstanding.  In  witness  whereof,  the  said 
parties  to  these  presents  have  hereunto  set  their  hands 
and  seals,  the  day  and  year  first  above  written,  at  Red 
River  settlement  aforesaid. 

"  Signed,  sealed,  and  delivered,   in    the  presence 
of 


The  manifest  intention  which  this  Deed  exhibits, 
is,  not  to  facilitate  the  conveyance  of  land  to  settlers 
— not  to  encourage  persons  to  settle,  but,  in  the 
event  of  settlement,  to  secure  the  Company's  privi- 
leges intact.  There  never  was  a  document  more 
manifestly  framed  to  secure  the  interests  of  the 
vendor,  and  not  of  the  purchasers  of  the  soil.  The 
settler  binds  himself  to  cultivate  a  certain  quantity 
within  a  certain  time — a  most  unnecessary  provision, 
one  would  imagine,  seeing  that  he  has  already  paid 
12s.  Gd.  (not  Is.  M.,  as  Mr.  Martin  states)  for  the 
land  ;  as  if  a  man  would  pay  what  in  that  country 


220  EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

is  a  very  high  price  for  land,  two  and  a  half  times 
as  much  as  he  would  have  to  pay  for  as  good  land 
on  the  same  river,  fifty  miles  farther  south  in  the 
American  territory, — as  if,  I  say,  a  man  would  give 
such  a  price  for  land,  unless  to  cultivate  it  in  the 
manner  most  conducive  to  his  own  interest. 

Next,  the  tenant  binds  himself,  under  pain  of 
forfeiture  of  his  whole  estate,  that  he  will  not,  by 
any  direct  or  indirect,  mediate  or  immediate,  man- 
ner, ways,  or  means,  infringe  or  violate  the  ex- 
clusive rights,  power,  privileges,  and  immunities, 
powers  of  commerce,  &c.,  or  all  or  any  of  the 
exclusive  rights,  &c.,  of  or  belonging,  or  in  any 
wise  appertaining  to,  or  held,  used  or  enjoyed  (that 
is  to  say,  whether  it  belongs  to  them  or  not)  by  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company ;  and  even  that  he  will  not 
aid,  assist,  or  abet,  attempt  to  aid,  assist,  or  abet, 
or  supply  with  spirituous  liquors,  trading  goods,  pro- 
visions, or  other  necessaries,  any  one  else  who  shall 
attempt  to  violate  the  same — and  all  this  amongst  a 
population  who  have  no  possible  means  of  ascertain- 
ing what  the  privileges  of  the  Company  really  are, 
and  are  obliged  to  believe  all  that  the  Company 
choose  to  say  respecting  them. 

A  colony  in  which  such  laws  are  in  force,  as 
are  quoted  from  the  Minutes  of  Council  above 
cited,   and  where  the  only    freehold   property  is 


EFFECTS   ON   THE    COLONISTS.  221 

to  be  obtained  under  this  Land  Deed,  is  as  unlike  a 
British  colony  as  anything  can  be  conceived. 

And  so  far  has  this  determination  to  stop  the  fur 
traffic  been  carried,  that  a  man  who  would  buy  land 
is  compelled  to  bind  himself,  under  forfeiture  of  his 
property,  that  he  will  not  carry  on  or  establish  a 
trade  or  traffic  in  or  relating  to  any  kind  of  skins, 
fm^,  peltry,  or  dressed  leather,  in  any  part  of  North 
America.  So  that  a  man  could  not  hold  land  at 
the  Red  River  settlement,  and  pursue  the  occupation 
of  a  shoemaker  in  Canada,  or  in  Mexico  :  to  such 
an  absurdity  has  this  tyranny  been  carried. 

Now  this  is  the  Company — one  capable  of  making 
such  regulations  as  these, — ^this  is  the  power  to 
which  is  to  be  now  entrusted  the  responsibility  of 
founding  a  British  colony  on  the  shores  of  the 
Pacific  Ocean.  This  is  the  body  to  whom  vast 
possessions  are  to  be  granted,  and  vast  powers 
entrusted,  without  any  kind  of  security  that  there 
shall  not  be,  in  their  new  territory,  a  repetition  of 
all  the  absurdities  which  disgrace  their  present 
domains — any  kind  of  security  that  this  Land  Deed, 
for  example,  shall  not  be  enforced  in  Vancouver's 
Island. 

But  not  only  is  it  made  compulsory  upon  every 
person  wishing  to  acquire  land  at  the  Red  River, 


222  EFFECTS    ON    THE   COLONISTS. 

to  sign  this  deed,  making  over  for  ever  some  of 
the  most  valuable  rights  of  property  and  privileges 
of  Englishmen,  but  many  of  the  old  settlers,  who 
held  land,  not  from  the  Company,  but  from  Lord 
Selkirk,  prior  to  the  territory  having  been  sold 
back  again  to  the  Company,  were  persuaded  by 
the  Company's  officers  to  give  up  their  old  Deed, 
and  to  sign  the  new  one. 

Thus  it  appears  that  all  the  interests  of  this  set- 
tlement are  made  subordinate  to  the  monopoly  of 
the  fur  trade.  Commerce  is  under  an  interdict — 
landed  property  is  unknown,  except  under  condi- 
tions which  make  the  freeholder  a  more  absolute 
slave  to  the  Company,  tlian  the  workman  or  the 
hunter. 

The  next  thing  to  be  noticed,  which  is  matter  of 
great  complaint  on  the  part  of  the  Red  River 
colonists,  is,  the  enormous  freights  which  they  have 
to  pay  for  any  mercantile  communication  with 
England.  The  letter  of  the  half-breeds,  quoted 
above,  mentions  £8 — the  Company  now  charge 
£9*  per  ton,  for  all  goods  shipped  to  York  Factory, 
for  any  of  the  settlers  at  the  Red  River:  these 
goods  have  then  to  be  conveyed  more  than  eight 

*   After   the  above   was  in  print,  I  heard  that  the  freight  has 
recently  been  reduced  to    £5. 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS.  223 

hundred  miles  up  the  country  to  the  settlement ; 
they  are  carried  in  boats  up  the  river,  and  across 
Lake  Winipeg.  The  route  is  interrupted  by  nume- 
rous portages — Mr.  Ballantyne  says  as  many  as 
thirty-six — ^at  each  of  which  the  boat  has  to  be  un- 
laden, and  all  the  goods,  and  sometimes  the  boats 
themselves,  have  to  be  carried  over  land  to  the  fresh 
place  of  embarkation.  The  length  of  these  portages 
varies  from  one  hundred  yards  to  above  a  mile.  The 
charge  which  the  Company  make  the  settlers  for 
the  conveyance  of  goods  from  York  Factory  to  the 
Red  River,  is  20^.  per  ninety  pounds,  or  £24.  2^.  2c/. 
per  ton, — which  makes,  altogether,  a  freight  of 
above  £33  per  ton,  from  London  to  the  Red  River. 

Now  the  Company  does  not  interfere  with  the 
settlers  who  may  choose  to  convey  their  own  goods 
from  the  settlement  to  York  Factory,  or  back  again, 
in  their  own  boats ;  but  it  is  not  clear  whether  they 
will  allow  any  other  than  themselves,  or  those  to 
whom  they  grant  a  special  licence,  to  convey  goods 
for  hire,  or  freight,  from  one  point  to  the  other. 

But,  however  this  may  be,  it  is  certain  that  no 
competition  whatever  is  permitted  to  interfere  with 
tlie  freight  for  goods  conveyed  from  England  to 
Hudson's  Bay.  None  of  their  illegal  rights  have 
the  Company  asserted  more  strenuously  than  this. 
The  waters  within  the  Hudson's  Straits  are  debarred 


224  EFFECTS   ON   THE    COLONISTS. 

to  all  but  the  Company's  navy — ^waters  teeming 
in  all  directions  with  whales,  seals,  and  other  fish, 
from  which  wealth  might  be  obtained,  and  in  the 
pursuit  of  which,  enterprise  and  capital  might  be 
profitably  expended ;  waters  washing  shores  where 
copper  and  lead  are  said  to  abound,  and  part  of 
which  would  amply  repay  the  toil  of  the  agricul- 
turist ;  waters  in  a  climate  less  severe,  and  where 
navigation  is  less  diifficult  than  those  of  other  parts  of 
the  globe  with  whose  industrious  inhabitants  the 
English  merchant  carries  on  a  prosperous  and 
advantageous  traffic ; — these  waters  are  to  be  for  ever 
undisturbed,  except  by  the  keels  of  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company's  "  annual  ships." 

Truly,  when  we  read  of  ^Hhe  annual  ship,"  with 
its  "annual"  cargo  of  skins,  we  are  carried  back  in 
imagination  to  the  days  of  the  Argonautic  Expedi- 
tion and  the  Golden  Fleece,  and  can  with  difficulty 
believe  that  we  are  speaking  of  the  operations  of  a 
great  mercantile  corporation  of  the  greatest  com- 
mercial country  in  the  world,  in  the  middle  of  the 
nineteenth  century. 

When  the  question  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany was  brought  before  a  Parliamentary  Com- 
mittee in  1748,  two  cases  "w^ere  mentioned,  in  which 
the  Company  had  seized  vessels  attempting  to 
penetrate  into  Hudson's  Bay  for  the  purpose   of 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS.  225 

trade.  The  plan  adopted  by  the  Company  was  to 
take  the  ships  and  run  them  on  shore,  where  they 
were  lost. 

There  was  an  action  respecting  one  of  these  ships, 
but  the  question  as  to  the  validity  of  the  Charter 
was  not  involved.  The  Company,  it  seems,  pleaded 
that  the  ships  were  lost  through  stress  of  weather. 
This  proves,  however,  the  determination  of  the 
Company,  from  the  first,  to  exclude  all  vessels  but 
their  own  from  the  waters  of  Hudson's  Bay. 

The  freight,  then,  which  the  Company  charge  to  the 
settlers  in  their  territory,  is  one  which  no  changes  in 
commerce,  no  fortunate  abundance  of  shipping,  or 
deficiency  of  cargoes,  can  ever  affect :  it  is  perma- 
ently  removed  from  all  possibility  of  change  :  and 
the  Company  have  only  to  say  that  so  much  shall 
be  charged,  and  it  is  charged.  The  measm-e  of 
freight  to  Hudson's  Bay  is  not  the  expense  of  the 
voyage,  but  the  squeezibility  of  the  settlers. 

The  voyage  to  York  Factory  averages  about  seven 
or  eight  weeks.  Tliis  is  a  long  voyage.  The  distance 
from  York  Factory  to  the  Orkney  Islands  having 
been  sailed  in  eighteen  days, — a  month  at  York 
Factory,  and  a  couple  of  months  to  return,  will 
give  an  entire  voyage  of  five  months  for  the  whole  : 
the  expense  of  chartering  a  ship  would  be  about 


226  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

16s.  per  ton  per  month,  i.  e.,  £4  for  the  voyage  out 
and  home.  But  the  Company  are  charging  £9*  for 
conveying  goods  out  in  a  vessel  which  must  go  out 
in  order  to  bring  their  furs  home. 

The  result  of  this  policy  is,  that  the  settlers  at  the 
Red  River  are  procuring  manufactured  goods  from 
the  American  frontiers,  especially  from  St.  Peter's 
and  St.  Louis  on  the  Mississippi,  instead  of  from 
England :  and  we  are  assured  that  English  manu- 
factured goods  can  be  conveyed  the  whole  of  the 
way  to  New  Orleans,  and  thence  by  the  entire 
length  of  the  Mississippi  up  to  its  source,  and 
thence  across  the  plains  in  waggons,  to  the  Red 
River  settlement,  for  not  much  more  than  half  the 
price  at  which,  under  the  Company's  auspices,  they 
can  be  conveyed  by  York  Factory  from  England. 

Now  we  do  request  the  reader  to  turn  to  the 
map  at  the  beginning  of  this  volume,  and  read  the 
above  statement  over  again  ;  but  we  request  him,  in 
addition,  to  observe  the  third  and  Canadian  route. 

The  conveyance  of  goods  by  water  carriage  is  prac- 
ticable the  whole  way  from  London  to  the  headof  Lake 
Superior  ;  and  from  Fort  William,  on  Lake  Supe- 
rior, there  is  water  carriage  by  rivers  and  lakes  the 
rest  of  tlie  way  to  the  Red  River  settlement :  and  it  is 
*  See  Note,  p.  222. 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS.  227 

asserted  by  those  who  have  travelled  both  routes, 
that  the  portages  are  neither  so  numerous  or  difficult 
along  these  rivers  as  they  are  along  those  which 
must  be  passed  between  York  Factory  and  the 
settlement. 

The  distance  between  Lake  Superior  and  the 
settlement  is  not  more  than  five  hundred  miles, 
while  from  Fort  York  the  distance  is  above  eight 
hundred.  The  route  from  Lake  Superior  is  not 
only  capable  of  being  made  practicable  and  easy? 
but  it  lies  through  the  richest  part  of  British  North 
America.  The  magnificence  of  the  river  is  dwelt 
upon  by  Sir  G.  Simpson,  as  well  as  by  all  who  have 
travelled  along  its  course. 

It  was  along  this  route  that  the  enterprising 
voyagem"  of  the  North- West  Company  of  Montreal 
conveyed  the  provisions  which  were  to  support  the 
trader  at  the  distant  and  isolated  posts,  which  his 
daring  energy  had  pushed  far  into  the  interior  of 
North  America,  and  down  which  he  returned  Lidjn 
with  the  spoil  of  the  furthest  recesses  of  the  conti- 
nent, at  a  time  when  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
under  the  narcotic  influence  of  their  Charter  and 
their  monopoly,  were  bargaining  with  the  straggling 
tribes  who  resorted  to  the  neighbourhood  of  Hud- 
son's Bay. 

q2 


228  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

The  settlers  of  the  Red  River  want  to  know  why 
that  route  is  not  again  opened, — why  the  Company,  if 
it  has  really  the  interest  of  the  settlement  at  heart, 
has  not  kept  up  the  communication  between  their 
country  and  the  Canadas  ?  and  they  assert,  appa- 
rently with  some  cause,  that  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company  piu^osely  oppose  every  barrier  between 
their  territories  and  the  Canadas,  in  the  dread  lest 
unrestrained  communication  might  awake  again  the 
rivalry  which  they  formerly  experienced,  and  risk 
the  validity  of  their  claims ;  and  so  the  Red  River 
settlement,  and  every  other  part  of  the  enormous 
territories  over  which  their  sway  extends,  are  lan- 
guishing under  the  interdict  of  perpetual  obscurity, 
which  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  are  necessitated 
to  inflict  for  the  protection  of  their  unwarrantable 
pretensions. 

There  will  not  be  space,  within  the  limits  of  this 
book,  to  specify  the  various  complaints  which  have 
been  made  against  the  Company  by  those  under 
its  government ;  and  it  must  be  borne  in  mind 
that  we  do  not  profess  to  prove,  nor  even  to  be 
responsible  for,  the  truth  of  all  that  it  is  necessary  to 
state  in  a  work  like  the  present.  We  say,  neces- 
sary  to  state,  because  our  task  is  to  shew  that  there 
is  a  stronger  -prima  facie  case  for  the  most  searching 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS.  229 

scrutiny  into  the  government  of  the  Indian  terri- 
tories, than  has  ever  been  shewn  in  any  case  what- 
soever. In  pursuance  of  this  object,  we  proceed  to 
state  one  or  two  more  of  the  grievances  under 
which  the  settlers  at  the  Red  River  assert  that  they 
are  suffering. 

The  first  example  I  shall  take  is  in  reference  to 
the  restrictions  in  the  trade  to  England.  The  case 
of  Mr.  Sinclair's  tallow  speculation  being  frustrated 
by  the  Company,  has  been  spoken  of.  Mr.  Sinclair 
has  other  complaints  to  make.  This  gentleman  was 
one  of  the  most  active  in  getting  up  the  petition  to 
the  Home  Government  against  the  management  of 
the  Company.  The  method  which  the  Company 
took  to  revenge  themselves,  is  too  singular  to  be 
overlooked.  Mr.  Sinclair  is  a  merchant  who  pro- 
cures goods  from  England,  and  disposes  of  them 
in  the  colony :  and  as  no  ships  are  allowed  inside 
Hudson's  Straits  except  those  belonging  to  the 
Company,  Mr.  Sinclair  had  no  means  of  procuring 
his  annual  stock  of  merchandise  from  London,  with 
which  to  carry  on  his  trade,  except  by  obtaining 
freight  for  it  in  the  Company's  vessels.  Of  course, 
then,  Mr.  Sinclair,  like  all  the  rest  of  the  colonists, 
was  not  only  compelled  to  procure  a  licence  from 
the  Company  to  allow  him  to  traffic  with  England 


230  EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

at  all,  but  was  entirely  dependent  upon  their  good- 
will for  obtaining  a  freight  for  his  goods,  even  at  the 
enormous  rate  which  they  ordinarily  charge. 

Well,  as  soon  as  it  was  known  that  Mr.  Sinclair 
was  one  of  the  "  turbulent  scoundrels,"  at  the  Red 
River,  who  thought  that  the  liberties  of  Englishmen 
were  scarcely  respected  in  that  colony,  and  that  a 
petition  to  the  Home  Government  might  improve 
matters,  a  letter  was  addressed  to  him,  of  which  the 
following  is  a  copy  : — 

"  Fort  Garry,  Red  River  Settlement, 
"  SiK,  "  August  25,  1845. 

"  I  beg  to  state,  that  in  a  private  letter  from 
Mr.  Secretary  Smith,  dated  the  18th  April  last,  and 
received  on  the  25th  instant,  I  am  requested  to  acquaint 
you,  that  no  goods  will  be  shipped  in  your  name  on 
board  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  ship  for  York  Fac- 
tory this  season. 

"  I  remain,  Sir, 
"  Your  most  obedient  Servant, 

"  Alexander  Christie." 
"  Mr.  James  Sinclair." 

So  that  Mr.  Sinclair,  for  offering  an  honest  poli- 
tical opposition  to  a  corrupt  and  tyrannical  govern- 
ment, was  deprived  of  the  supply  of  merchandise 
which  was  necessary  to  enable  him  to  carry  on  his 
lawful  vocation.     Can  there  be  found,  in  any  of  the 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS.  231 

worst  pages  of  English  history,  a  more  wanton  and 
undisguised  piece  of  tyranny  than  this  ?  And  yet 
this  is  what  may  happen  every  day  in  a  country 
under  such  a  system  as  that  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company,  and  as  that  under  which,  in  a  great  mea- 
sure, Her  Majesty's  Government  are  desirous  of 
placing  Vancouver's  Island. 

There  is  another  point  which  ought  to  be  noticed, 
not  because  it  is  complained  of  by  the  settlers  as  a 
grievance,  but  because  it  is  an  instance  of  the  mi- 
scrupulous  manner  in  which  the  Company  set  the 
laws  of  this  coimtry  at  defiance. 

The  fact  was  alluded  to  above,  that  an  Indian 
was  hanged  at  the  Red  River  settlement.  There 
have  been,  it  would  seem,  two,  if  not  three,  execu- 
tions, since  the  Recorder  commenced  his  duties  at 
the  settlement. 

It  would  not  be  a  matter  of  complaint  that  a 
person  worthy  of  death  should  meet  with  the  punish- 
ment he  deserved,  were  it  not  expressly  provided  by 
Act  of  Parliament  that  he  should  not. 

An  Act  of  Parliament  was  passed,  42  Geo.  HI., 
cap.  138,  for  establishing  the  jurisdiction  of  the 
Canadian  Courts  over  the  Indian  Territories ;  and, 
by  that  Act,  crimes  committed  beyond  the  limits 
of  the  Canadas,  were  to  be  considered  as  if  com- 


232  EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

mitted  within  those  limits,  and  to  be  tried  in  the 
Canadian  Courts  of  Law. 

Another  Act,  1  &  2  Geo.  IV.,  cap.  66,  was 
passed,  declaring  that  the  Act  of  Geo.  III.,  just 
quoted,  should  be  considered  to  apply  to  "  Rupert's 
Land^^  as  well  as  to  "  The  Indian  Territories." 
This  Act  also  especially  provided  that  all  felons, 
and  all  civil  causes  in  which  the  amount  of  pro- 
perty involved  exceeded  £200,  should  not  be  tried 
in  the  Courts  of  Law  in  Rupert's  Land  and  the 
Indian  Territories,  but  should  be  tried  in  the 
Canadian  Courts  alone. 

Consequently,  the  trying  and  hanging  a  man  for 
murder  in  the  Red  River  settlement,  is  directly  in 
violation  of  Act  of  Parliament. 

But,  a  grievance  more  nearly  affecting  the  mass 
of  the  colonists  is,  that  they  are  taxed  by  an 
arbitrary  power  in  an  illegal  manner.  It  will  be 
seen,  by  an  examination  of  the  Minutes  of  the 
Council  at  Red  River,  quoted  above,  that  the 
Company  institute  what  tariff  they  please,  and  that 
they  have  so  arranged  their  tariff  as  to  make  the 
payment  of  duty  a  punishment  for  interfering  with 
their  exclusive  trade.  It  appears  that  the  Red 
River  settlement  is  under  the  management  of  the 
Governor  of  Assimbnia,  and  a  Council,  who  ad- 


EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS.  233 

minister  all  the  ordinary  affairs  of  the  colony ;  but 
there  is  another,  and  superior,  Council,  which  sits 
once  a  year,  and  is  called  together  by  the  Governor 
of  the  whole  of  the  Company's  territories,  at  any 
place  convenient  to  himself.  This  Council  consists 
of  chief  factors  and  chief  traders,  from  various  parts 
of  North  America :  the  Minutes,  quoted  above, 
were  passed  at  a  meeting  of  this  Supreme  Council. 
Now  it  is  impossible  to  ascertain  what  are  the  dis- 
tinctive functions  of  these  two  Councils;  but  the 
Red  River  people  assert  that  it  is  in  the  highest 
degree  unjust  and  injurious  that  their  affairs  should 
be  interfered  with  by  a  Court  composed  of  men  who 
are  collected  from  all  parts  of  North  America,  for 
the  purpose  of  regulating  the  fur  trade,  and  have 
no  interest  whatsoever  in  their  prosperity,  and 
possess  neither  acquaintance  with,  nor  sympathy  for, 
their  necessities  as  colonists.  By  one,  or  both,  of 
these  Councils — ^in  fine,  by  the  arbitrary  power  of 
the  Company — ^taxes^re  imposed,  and  duties  levied ; 
and  no  account  whatsoever  is  rendered  to  the  tax- 
payers, of  the  disbursement  of  the  public  money. 
Now  the  whole  of  this  transaction  is  vtterly  illegal^ 
from  one  end  to  the  otlier.  The  Crown  having  no 
power  to  impose  taxes  without  the  consent  of  Par- 
liament, is  manifestly  incapacitated  from  conferring 


234  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

that  power  upon  any  person  or  company  whatsoever. 
Nor  can  we  find  that  any  such  power  is  granted 
even  by  the  Charter.  Nay,  more  than  this,  a 
careful  inspection  of  the  Charter  will  shew  that  no 
authority  whatsoever  belongs  to  the  Company,  to 
make  laws,  except  "for  the  good  government  of 
the  said  Company,  and  of  all  Governors  of  colonies, 
forts,  plantations,  factors,  masters,  mariners,  and 
other  officers  employed,  or  to  he  employed,  in  any  of 
the  territories  or  lands  aforesaid,  and  in  any  of 
their  voyages."  The  Company  may  impose  pains 
and  penalties,  and  punishments,  upon  all  offenders 
contrary  to  such  laws,  &c.  ;  but  there  does  not 
appear  to  be  any  authority  to  make  laws,  except 
for  persons  in  their  own  employment.  It  is  true 
that  the  Governors,  and  their  Councils,  appointed 
by  the  Company,  have  "power  to  judge  all  persons 
belonging  to  the  said  Governor  and  Company,  or 
that  shall  live  under  them,  in  all  causes,  whether 
civil  or  criminal,  according  to  the  laws  of  this 
Kingdom,  and  to  execute  justice  accordingly.^^  So 
that  there  was  a  distinction  drawn  between  the 
legislative  and  executive  powers  entrusted  to  the 
Company  : — their  legislative  authority  extending 
only  to  servants  in  their  employ,  whilst  they  were 
empowered  to  administer  the  law  of  England  to  all 


EFFECTS   ON   THE   COLONISTS.  235 

who  might  live  under  their  sway.  The  right  of  the 
Company,  therefore,  to  make  laws  for,  and  especially 
to  tax^  the  settlers  at  the  Red  River,  is  wholly  and 
indefensibly  illegal. 

The  government  of  the  Red  River  settlement 
appears  to  be,  as  might  be  expected,  a  most  ex- 
traordinary jumble  between  the  necessities  of  the 
fur  trade,  and  the  wants  of  settlers ;  at  least  this 
was  the  view  taken  by  one,  of  whom  Sir  John  Pelly 
asserted  to  Her  Majesty's  Government,  that  "  no 
man  in  the  Company's  service  enjoyed  such  op- 
portunities as  he  did,  of  becoming  acquainted  with 
their  management,  and  none  was  better  able  to 
appreciate  its  effects."  Mr.  Thomas  Simpson  says,  in 
in  a  letter  to  his  brother,  written  from  the  Red 
River, — 

"  Our  plans  of  colonization  are  so  wild  and  unfortunate, 
and  the  Company's  business  is  tortured  by  so  many  and 
such  strange  changes,  that,  as  a  man  of  business,  I  feel 
but  little  satisfaction  in  it.  We  have  shepherds,  shep- 
herdesses, and  dogs,  numberless,  come  out,  but  the  wolves 
have  been  ravaging  the  flocks ;  the  tallow  trade  is  broken 
up,  and  the  experimental  farm  bedevilled.  All  that 
sort  of  thing,  to  be  permanent,  must  be  done  by  the 
settlers  themselves ;  but  the  business  here  is  tagged 
together  in  the  most  strange  and  unsatisfactory  manner." 

"  We  have  abundant  crops  and  provisions  from  the 
plains  this  year ;  money  and  meat  are  abundant,  and  that 
is  all  that  can  be  said  of  the  place ;  discomfort,  isolation, 


236  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

prodigality,  idleness,  and  immorality,  with  its  concomi-' 
tant  pleasures,  complete  the  picture."* 

"  You  can  have  no  idea  of  the  curious  position  the 
Company  holds  here.  The  land  of  the  colony,  and  the 
right  of  the  government,  is  Lord  Selkirk's,  by  grant 
from  the  Company;  and,  until  1826,  the  executors  of 
the  late  Earl  had  a  separate  establishment,  with  a 
Governor  of  their  own  ;  but  since  then,  their  affairs  have 
been  managed  exclusively  by  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany, the  Hudson's  Bay  Factor  has  been  their  Governor, 
and  the  Hudson's  Bay  Fort  their  place  of  business  ;  but 
they  sell  the  land  at  12*.  6d.  per  acre,  and  pocket  the 
money — a  very  cheap  and  convenient  method,  you  will 
say.  It  is  true  they  keep  about  a  score  of  policemen  in 
pay ;  but  this  force  is  a  mere  nonentity,  and  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  have  virtually  to  act  as  judge,  jury,  and 
jailor,  in  his  Lordship's  colony."f 

This  was  the  opinion  of  the  best  and  most  intelli- 
gent of  the  Company's  servants,  respecting  the  con- 
dition of  the  settlement  a  few  years  ago ;  and  such 
an  opinion  alone,  is  enough  to  excite  a  suspicion  in 
the  minds  of  fair  thinking  men,  that  all  in  that 
colony  is  not  as  the  Company  have  persuaded  their 
champion  to  describe  it. 

I  know  that  a  great  stress  has  been  laid  upon  the 
prosperity  of  the  Red  River  settlement,  and  that 
there  is  a  disposition  on  the  part  of  those  in  power, 
to  rest  contented  with  the  single  fact,  that  such  a 
settlement  exists,  and  that  it  has  increased  to  its 

*  Life  and  Travels  of  Thomas  Simpson,  p.  92.        f  'd.,  p.  94. 


EFFECTS   ON   THE   COLONISTS.  237 

present  state  of  prosperity,  as  a  suflficient  evidence 
to  contradict  all  that  has  been  urged  against  the 
government  of  the  Company.  Those  who  have 
fallen  into  this  opinion,  must  first  have  believed  all 
the  fables  which  have  been  put  forth  as  to  the  great 
difficulty  of  settling  and  civilizing  the  country. 

But  there  is  another  light  in  which  to  view  this 
fact  of  the  Red  River  colony  :  when  we  shew  that 
such  absolute  misgovemment  exists,  and  know  that 
in  spite  of  all,  the  colony  has  grown  to  a  certain 
magnitude,  and  attained  a  certain  degree  of  pros- 
perity ;  it  is  not  without  reason,  that  we  doubt 
altogether  the  exaggerated  accounts  which  have 
been  given  of  the  obstacles  in  the  way  of  spreading 
Christianity  aud  civilization  through  those  distant 
regions ;  and  that  we  ask,  if  such  have  been  the 
results,  under  so  narrow  and  tyrannical  a  system  of 
management,  what  might  not  have  been  effected 
under  a  generous  and  liberal  government? 

The  question  is.  What  has  grown  up  ?  and.  What 
might  have  grown  up  ?  Have  we,  at  this  moment,  at 
the  Red  River,  "  a  rising  community,"  which,  in 
the  words  of  Sir  J.  II.  Pelly  to  Lord  Glenelg,  "  if 
well  governed,  may  be  found  useful  at  some  future 
period,  in  the  event  of  difficulties  occurring  between 
Great  Britain  and  the  United  States  of  America?  " 


238  EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

or  have  you  a  community  of  which  Mr.  T.  Simpson 
could  speak  as  follows  ? 

"  Many  of  the  industrious  Scotch  who  first  planted 
the  colony  in  1811,  under  the  auspices  of  the  late  Earl 
of  Selkirk,  have  saved  handsome  sums  of  money,  besides 
rearing  large  families  in  rustic  plenty.  A  considerable 
portion  of  th's  valuable  class,  however,  dreading  the 
predominance  and  violence  of  the  half-breeds,  with 
whom  they  have  avoided  intermarrying,  have  converted 
their  property  into  money,  and  removed  to  the  United 
States."* 

Is  this  a  colony  of  which  England  can  boast  ?  or 
is  this  to  be  the  barrier  upon  which  England  is  to 
depend,  against  the  encroachments  of  the  United 
States  ?  All  the  best  settlers  already  gone  over  to 
the  enemy,  and  the  rest  only  awaiting  the  refusal  of 
the  Colonial  Office,  and  of  the  Parliament,  to  listen 
to  the  complaints  which  they  have  made,  in  order  to 
follow  the  example. 

The  English  public  shall  not  be  left  in  ignorance 
that  a  considerable  portion  of  the  half-breeds  of  the 
Red  River  will,  if  changes  in  the  government  of  that 
colony  be  not  speedily  introduced,  throw  themselves 
into  the  arms  of  the  Americans. 

The  following  is  an  extract  from  a  letter  received 
from  the  Red  River,  from  one  who  is  well  acquainted 

•  Life  and  Travels  of  Thomas  Simpson,  p.  88. 


EFFECTS    ON   THE    COLONISTS.  239 

with  the  opinions  and  feelings  of  the  half-breeds  of 
that  colony.     It  is  dated  September  8,  1848  : — 

"  lis  ont  la  confiance  que  si  la  Compagnie  obtient  la 
confirmation  cle  sa  Charte,  cette  Charte  sera  du  moins 
modifie  de  maniere  a  n'  exclurre  du  droit  de  traite  que 
les  etrangers  et  nullement  les  natifs  du  pays.  Que  si 
les  Metifs  se  voyent  interdits  la  jouissance  des  produits 
de  leur  pays  au  protit  d'aventuriers  etrangers  exclusive- 
ment  et  cela  par  un  acte  du  Parlement  ils  sont  decides 
a  exposer  la  rationabilite  de  leur  plaintes  et  de  leur 
demandes  au  Congres  des  Etats  Unis,  et  le  refus  qui 
leur  aura  ete  fait  par  le  Parlement  Britannique ;  puis 
se  decideront  k  demander  au  dit  Congres  de  bien  vouloir 
prendre  possession  de  leur  pays  et  se  soumettront  aux 
loix  des  Etats  Unis,  Or  je  saLs  de  bonne  source  que  cette 
ofi're  sera  acceptee.  Il-y-a  Deja  un  certain  nombre  des 
Metis  etablis  a  J'imbina,  et  bien  surement  si  la  Com- 
pagnie obtient  un  pouvoir  aussi  despotique  qui  celui 
qu'elle  exerce  depuis  si  long  tenis,  tout  finiront  par 
passer  de  ce  cote-ci  de  la  ligne  et  se  trouvant  plus 
fort,  ils  feront  voir  alors  qui  en  aura  eu  tort  d'avoir 
meprise  leur  plaintes." 

It  is  high  time  we  should  begin  to  rate  the 
patriotism  of  this  Company,  for  whose  sake  we  have 
made  such  enormous  sacrifices,  at  its  true  value. 

The  Company  have  now,  for  a  long  time,  urged 
claims  on  this  country,  on  the  score  of  the  national 
benefits  we  have  received  from  it,  in  the  shape  of 
British  influence  maintained  throughout  the  continent 
of  North  America. 

Is  tliis  a  just  or  a  fraudulent  demand  ?   We  have 


240  EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS.' 

already,  in  the  first  chapter  of  this  book,  shewn 
very  strong  reasons  for  suspecting  that  the  Company 
have  betrayed  the  interests  of  this  country  on  the 
west  of  the  Rocky  Mountains ;  and  that  it  was  by 
their  influence  and  agency  that  the  colony  of 
American  citizens  was  established,  which  gave  the 
United  States  a  claim,  which  they  otherwise  coidd 
not  have  had,  to  the  best  part  of  the  Oregon 
territory. 

We  have  shewn  that  when  there  was  a  question 
about  the  boundary  at  the  opposite  comer  of  their 
dominions,  the  neighbourhood  of  the  Red  River,  they 
resigned  a  considerable  tract  of  country,  which,  if 
there  were  one  jot  or  tittle  of  validity  in  their  Charter, 
belonged,  beyond  all  question,  to  this  country; 
and  that  they  did  so,  because  they  had  rather  that 
their  country  should  lose  its  dominions,  than  that 
they  should  risk  their  privilege?.  And  now  they 
stick  up  this  bugbear,  to  frighten  us  into  the  idea 
that  British  ascendancy  in  the  continent  west  of  the 
Canadas  depends  solely  upon  what  their  govern- 
ment and  their  patriotism  has  effected  ;  but  the  fact 
at  last  comes  out,  that  the  inhabitants  of  the  only 
colony  they  have  formed  are  waiting  the  first  oppor- 
tunity of  throwing  itself  into  the  arms  of  the 
Americans. 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS.  241 

The  Company  are  responsible  for  the  character  and 
politics  of  this  their  colony  :  no  one  has  interfered 
with  them  in  its  erection  or  its  government :  it  is 
their  child,  not  typically,  but  really.  Not  only  is 
the  settlement  itself,  in  its  collective  and  corporate 
existence,  a  commimity  of  their  organization  and 
management,  but  the  very  inhabitants  themselves — 
these  half-breeds  of  the  Red  River,  are  their  bodily 
descendants.  Then  the  Company  alone  is  respon- 
sible for  the  child  of  its  creation  and  education; 
and  we  have,  therefore,  a  right  to  demand  an 
account  of  its  stewardship. 

Never  has  there  been  a  community,  in  the  whole 
world  and  in  all  time,  which  has  had  so  few  difficulties 
to  contend  against  as  the  settlement  of  the  Red  River. 
No  great  influx  of  settlers,  from  them  other  or  any 
other  country,  have  imported  hostile  or  disloyal 
opinions  into  the  colony.  No  surrounding  commu- 
nities have  been  acting  upon  it  with  various  and 
opposing  influence  :  it  has  been  cut  off  from  the 
opinions,  the  politicsf,  the  agitation  of  the  world — 
isolated,  far  more  by  the  pecuhar  policy  which  has 
pervaded  its  government,  than  even  by  the  remote 
and  inaccessible  situation  in  which  it  is  placed.  Its 
opinions,  its  feelings,  its  political  tendency,  have 
been  wholly  self-developed. 


242  EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

And  yet  with  all  these  favourable  circumstances, 
when  the  Company  might  have  stood,  not  only  in 
the  light  of  parent  to  the  inhabitants,  but  of  bene- 
factor to  the  community,  and  so  have  monopolised 
the  whole  and  entire  affections  of  the  social  body, 
what  is  the  truth? — that  the  Company  is  hated; 
and  England  hated  in  the  Company. 

There  is  indeed  something  strange  and  awful  in 
the  manner  in  which  the  avenging  Deity  has  found 
a  weapon  for  the  chastisement  of  this  Corporation 
in  the  discontent  of  its  own  offspring.  It  made  the 
native  man  the  tool  of  its  pocket,  and  the  native 
woman  the  slave  of  its  passions  ;  but  the  very  crime 
itself  has  generated  the  instrument  of  a  retributive 
justice.  "  Viewing  the  service  generally,"  said 
Thomas  Simpson,  "  I  must  candidly  confess,  judging 
from  the  actions  of  others,  that  its  promises  of  hap- 
piness are  hollow,  whilst  an  awful  fatality  seems  to 
overhang  its  retiring  members — a  punishment  for  the 
unprincipled  and  licentious  lives  they  have  led." 
And  now  it  would  seem  that  the  same  language 
might  be  applied  to  the  last  days  of  the  Company 
itself,  which  its  wisest  servant  applied  to  its  members. 
The  Company  can  govern  these  half-breeds  no 
longer.  If  Parliament  does  not  interfere,  the  mono- 
poly of  the  fur  trade  will  only  be  preserved  by  vio- 


EFFECTS    ON    THE    COLONISTS.  243 

lence — ^for  the  half-breeds  will  trade  in  furs  :  they 
consider  that  it  is  their  legal  right,  and  they  can 
only  be  prevented  by  actual  violence,  from  enforcing 
their  claim. 

These  half-breeds  are  not  to  be  despised  or 
neglected  :  they  are  a  fine  race  of  men,  combining 
the  ready  intelligence — that  quickness  in  acquiring 
knowledge,  and  the  desire  for  improvement,  which 
belong  to  the  civilized  man ;  with  the  endurance, 
the  enterprise,  the  intolerance  of  oppression,  the 
determination  to  revenge,  which  are  peculiar  to  the 
savage. 

Through  the  half-breed  race,  the  means  are  open 
for  civilizing  the  whole  coimtry,  by  acting  on  the 
Indian  families  who  are  related  to  them.  If  there 
were  any  real  desire  on  the  part  of  the  Company  to 
do  so,  the  Indians  could,  by  the  influence  which 
might  thus  be  brought  to  act  upon  them,  be  induced 
to  leave  their  wandering  life,  and  quit  the  precarious 
subsistence  of  the  chase,  for  the  surer  livelihood  to 
be  drawn  from  the  cultivation  of  the  soil. 

Without  this,  there  can  be  no  hope  of  reclaiming 
the  Indian ;  by  it,  that  result  might  be  secured. 

Upon  every  consideration,  therefore, — for  the  inte- 
rests of  humanity  itself,  the  good  government  and 
conciliation  of  the  half-breeds  is  a  matter  of  the 

r2 


244  EFFECTS   ON    THE    COLONISTS. 

deepest  importance.  But  this  Company  have  pro- 
voked their  hostility  without  possessing  the  power 
to  restrain  their  passions.  It  has  robbed  them  of 
the  inheritance  of  their  rights  as  savages,  which 
they  claim  as  descendants  from  the  natives  of  the 
soil:  it  has  deprived  them  of  the  privileges  of 
British  law,  which  they  claim  as  British  subjects 
and  colonists. 

In  respect  to  every  function  of  government — the 
legislative,  the  executive,  the  commercial,  the  finan- 
cial, the  colonial,  in  whatever  light  its  administra- 
tion can  be  regarded, — this  Corporation  exceeded  its 
powers,  neglected  its  duties,  violated  the  law,  and 
disobeyed  its  Charter. 


CHAPTER  IX. 


VANCOUVER  S     ISLAND: WHAT     IT     WILL     BE 

WHAT    IT   MIGHT    HAVE    BEEN. 

This  work  was  on  the  point  of  going  to  the  press, 
when  an  advertisement  appeared  in  the  Times^  of 
the  27th  January,  by  which  the  public  were  in- 
formed that  the  Charter  granting  Vancouver's 
Island  to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  had  been 
finally  signed  on  the  13th  of  that  month. 

One  of  the  objects  contemplated  in  this  publica- 
tion was  a  full  statement  of  the  reasons  why  that 
grant  ought  not  to  have  been  made,  under  any  cir- 
cumstances, but,  especially,  not  until  a  complete 
and  impartial  investigation  into  the  charges  which 
have  been  made  against  the  Company,  and  which 
are  the  subject  of  the  foregoing  pages,  had  enabled 
the  Government  and  Parliament  to  decide  whether 
the  Company  could  be  safely  trusted  with  any  ad- 
ditional power  :  whether,  in  short,  the  object  being 
to  found  a  colony,  it  were  true  or  false,  that  the 
Company  to  whom  it  was  proposed  to  entrust  the 
task,  were  deserving  of  such  a  character  as  would 


246  Vancouver's  island. 

effectually  prevent  any  colonists  from  putting  them- 
selves under  its  sway. 

To  dwell  upon  this  subject,  now  that  the  Charter 
has  finally  issued,  would  be,  perhaps,  only  waste 
of  time.  The  Hudson's  Bay  Company  are  in  pos- 
session of  Vancouver's  Island,  for  a  few  years,  at 
any  rate  ;  unless,  indeed,  the  Parliament  should 
deem  the  subject  of  sufficient  importance  to  justify 
its  addressing  the  Crown  with  the  object  of  recalling 
the  grant. 

However  this  may  be,  a  few  remarks  upon  the 
future  prospects  of  this  most  valuable  and  important 
possession,  may  not  be  without  interest  or  utility. 
Wlien,  towards  the  close  of  the  last  session  of 
Parliament,  the  Charter  which  it  was  proposed  to 
issue  was  laid  before  the  Houses  of  Parliament, 
there  were  two  objections  taken : — ^first,  that  the 
Company  were  not,  under  any  circumstances,  the 
proper  recipients  of  such  a  grant ;  secondly,  that, 
supposing  them  to  have  been  so,  the  grant  in 
question  was  a  most  unwise  one. 

The  first  of  these  objections  remains  unchanged  ; 
the  second  still  applies,  though  in  a  less  degree. 
And  if  there  were  wanted  any  justification  for  the 
opposition  which  was  raised  against  the  scheme 
proposed  by  the  Colonial  Office,  it  would  be  afiorded 


Vancouver's  island.  247 

by  the  fact,  that  some  of  the  worst  features  which 
the  proposed  grant  exhibited,  have  been  changed  in 
that  which  has  actually  issued.  For  example :  it 
was  originally  proposed  to  vest  in  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  the  property  of  all  the  fish  in  the 
waters  in  and  about  the  island.  That  right  the 
Company  have  been  compelled  to  abandon^  in  obe- 
dience to  public  opinion  ;  and  the  fisheries  will  now 
be  open  to  all  who  may  think  it  worth  their  while  to 
settle  in  the  new  colony,  under  the  auspices  of  the 
Company. 

Again,  it  was  originally  proposed  by  Earl  Grey 
to  leave  the  administration  of  justice  to  the  pro- 
visions of  the  Act  1  &  2  Geo.  IV.,  cap.  66,  by  which 
all  cases  of  felony,  and  all  civil  causes  in  which  the 
property  involved  amounts  to  more  than  £200,  are 
compelled  to  be  tried  in  the  Canadian  Courts. 

Although  nothing  is  added  to  the  Charter 
itself  respecting  this  point,  yet,  in  the  proposed 
scheme  of  government  which  appeared  in  the  adver- 
tisement mentioned  above,  a  public  guarantee  is 
now  given  that  an  application  shall  be  made  to 
Parliament  to  remove  the  restrictions  of  the  Act  of 
George  IV.,  and  to  vest  the  power  of  administering 
English  law  in  the  local  tribunals  of  the  new 
colony. 


248  Vancouver's  island. 

Again,  in  the  original  grant,  there  was  no 
guarantee  of  any  kind  that  the  profits  arising  from 
the  sale  of  the  land,  and  from  the  royalty  which  the 
Company  are  permitted  to  demand  from  the  settlers, 
for  the  right  of  working  the  mines  and  minerals,  should 
be  expended  for  the  public  benefit  of  the  community 
of  colonists.  In  the  actual  Charter,  however,  it 
appears  that  a  clause  has  been  inserted,  by  which  the 
Company  are  bound  to  expend  nine-tenths  of  such 
money  in  the  improvement  of  the  colony,  reserving 
to  themselves  as  profit,  only  ten  per  cent,  of  the 
whole  of  the  revenue  derived  from  these  sources. 

It  is  not  at  all  clear,  as  yet,  what  the  Company 
are  going  to  do,  which  will  entitle  them  to  the 
enjoyment  of  one-tenth  of  the  public  funds  of  the 
new  colony :  but,  at  the  same  time,  a  great  step 
has  been  gained  in  procuring  a  guarantee  that  nine- 
tenths  shall  not  swell  the  dividends  of  the  Company, 
or  be  diverted  from  the  objects  to  which  they  are 
justly  applicable. 

All  the  three  points  here  noticed  are  very  im- 
portant changes  in  the  original  design  of  the 
Charter,  as  afiecting  the  future  prospects  of  the 
colonists :  they  by  no  means,  however,  embrace 
all  the  objections  which  were  urged  against  the 
proposed  grant. 


Vancouver's  island.  249 

The  objections  which  have  been  left  unnoticed, 
are  no  less  sound  than  those  which  have  been  met  by 
alterations  in  the  terms  of  the  Charter ;  and  it  will 
not  be  possible  to  speculate  on  fche  future  prospects 
of  the  colony,  without  shewing  how  the  objection- 
able features  which  remain  will  probably  operate 
on  its  interests. 

It  would  be  an  error  to  suppose  that  those  who 
have  taken  an  interest  in  the  colonization  of  the 
north-west  coast  of  America,  and  who  have  opposed 
the  extension  of  the  power  of  the  Hudson's  Bay 
Company,  have  nothing  [more  to  do,  because  the 
Charter  which  disposes  of  Vancouver's  Island  has 
actually  issued. 

According  to  this  Charter,  the  Crown  reserves  to 
itself  the  power  of  recalling  the  grant  of  Van- 
couver's Island  at  the  end  of  five  years,  should 
it  appear  that  a  want,  either  of  capacity  or  of  will, 
has  frustrated  its  intentions.  Again,  the  Crown 
reserves  the  right  of  buying  back  the  island,  at  the 
time  when  the  Licence  of  Trade  over  the  Indian 
Territories  expires,  in  1859,  at  the  price  of  whatever 
sum  the  Company  may,  in  the  mean  time,  have  ex- 
pended. Hence,  it  behoves  the  public  and  the  Par- 
liament to  watch  with  a  jealous  eye  the  manner  in 
which  the  Company  execute  the  task  which  they  profess 


250  Vancouver's  island. 

to  have  undertaken ;  and  to  repair,  in  some  measure, 
the  mischief  that  has  been  done,  by  insisting  on  the 
revocation  of  the  grant,  if  the  Company  fail  to  fulfil 
its  intentions.         « 

There  is  ample  evidence  in  the  foregoing  pages, 
that  the  Company  are  not  to  be  trusted.  If  it  be 
true  that  they  obtained  great  privileges,  mider  the 
pretence  of  making  geographical  discoveries,  without 
the  least  intention  of  making  any  discoveries  at  all, 
and  that  they  applied  for  the  renewal  of  extensive 
powers,  on  the  plea  that  they  would  be  enabled  to 
civilize  and  to  Christianize  the  Indian  population, 
and  yet  have  never  taken  the  least  trouble  to  do 
one  or  the  other ;  then  it  is  neither  sceptical  nor  un- 
charitable, when  they  solicit  a  grant  of  Vancouver's 
Island,  on  the  promise  that  they  will  colonize  it, 
to  reply,  we  have  not  the  smallest  faith  that  you 
will  keep  your  promise,  unless  you  are  compelled 
to  do  so. 

Nor  is  ovT  faith  in  the  promises  of  the  Company 
at  all  increased  by  their  publication  of  a  showy 
advertisement  for  colonists ;  which  will  probably  have 
no  other  result  than  that  of  afibrding  an  argument 
to  the  Company,  at  some  future  time,  to  prove 
that  the  failure  of  the  colony  was  not  their  own 
fault. 


Vancouver's  island.  251 

■  There  is  strong  reason  to  suspect  that  the  Com- 
pany never  did  intend  to  colonize  any  part  of  their 
territories.  They  never  proposed  to  do  so  until  it 
was  inevitable  that  it  must  be  done  by  some  one  : 
and  their  whole  conduct  suggests  the  idea  of  a  desire 
to  get  possession  of  the  country,  only  for  the  purpose 
of  keeping  others  out.  Driten  out  of  this  design 
by  public  opinion,  they  have  undertaken  to  colonize, 
or  to  give  back  the  island  to  the  Crown,  to  be  dis- 
posed of  to  those  who  will  do  so.  It  is  our  task  to 
insist  upon  this  condition  being  fulfilled. 

As  affecting  the  future  prospects  of  the  colony  of 
Vancouver's  Island,  it  is  extremely  difficult  to  under- 
stand what  position  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
are  to  occupy,  or  what  specific  duties  have  been 
imposed  upon  them.  It  is  not  easy  to  perceive  what 
tasks  have  been  assigned  to  them,  which  could  not 
have  been  performed  as  well,  or  better,  by  Her 
Majesty's  Government,  and  by  the  local  Colonial 
Government. 

There  are  certain  officers  in  a  colony  who  ought, 
as  the  general  opinion  is,  to  be  appointed  by  the 
Crown,  for  the  sake  of  preserving  a  connecting  link 
between  the  mother  country  and  its  dependency: 
such  are  the  Governor  and  the  Chief  Administrator 
of  the  Law. 


252  Vancouver's  island. 

It  is  conceivable  that  the  Crown  may  waive  the 
right  of  this  appointment  in  favom*  of  the  settlers, 
for  the  sake  of  seeming  the  services  of  a  Governor 
well  acquainted  with  the  local  necessities  and  in- 
terests of  a  distant  colony,  and  commanding  the 
respect  and  esteem  of  its  citizens ;  but  one  is  at  a 
loss  to  know  why  that  right  should  be  waived  in 
favour  of  a  commercial  Company,  which,  being 
altogether  irresponsible  for  the  exercise  of  its  patron- 
age, can  have  less  motive  than  even  the  Colonial 
Office  to  appoint  an  efficient  officer.  There  can 
be  no  grounds,  then,  for  allowing  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  to  dispose  of  the  Government  ap- 
pointments, whatever  they  may  be,  in  Vancouver's 
Island. 

To  survey  the  land,  to  apportion  it  to  settlers,  to 
fix  its  price,  to  receive  the  money  paid  for  it,  to 
charter  ships  for  emigrants,  to  see  the  emigrants 
comfortably  provided  for  on  board  the  vessels,  and 
lodged  on  their  arrival  in  the  colony — all  these  are 
simple  operations,  which  must  be  performed  by  paid 
agents ;  and  those  agents,  or  those  who  employ 
them,  ought  to  be  responsible  for  the  manner  in 
which  these  tasks  are  performed,  to  those  for  whose 
benefit  they  are  undertaken — that  is,  to  the  settlers 
in  the  new  colony.     Therefore,  there  is  no  reason 


i 


Vancouver's  island.  253 

why  these  duties  should  have  been  imposed  upon  a 
trading  Company,  who  are  only  incidentally  and 
remotely  responsible  for  their  conduct. 

Still  less  is  it  necessary  to  employ  such  a  body  to 
collect  and  expend  public  money  of  any  kind, 
whether  it  be  collected  as  taxes,  or  as  the  price  of 
land,  (which  should  be  only  another  name  for  a  tax 
for  the  import  of  sufficient  labour,)  or  as  royalty  for 
the  right  of  working  mines  and  minerals.  All  these 
are  public  funds,  collected  and  held  in  trust  for  the 
community  of  colonists,  and  of  which  an  account 
ought  to  be  rendered  to  those  whose  interest  it  is  to 
see  that  they  are  managed  for  the  public  weal. 
Therefore,  here  again,  it  does  not  appear  that  the 
interposition  of  an  irresponsible  Company  can  be 
attended  with  benefit  to  the  colony. 

There  is  only  one  ground  which  has  been  put 
forward  as  a  justification  of  the  course  pursued. 
It  has  been  implied  by  Her  Majesty's  Govern- 
ment, that  the  Company  are  about  to  advance 
the  capital  necessary  for  the  first  settlement  of  the 
colony. 

The  Minister  for  the  Colonies  acquainted  the 
House  of  Lords,  in  the  last  session  of  Parliament, 
that  the  reason  why  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
had  been  applied  to  to  undertake  the  colonization 


254  Vancouver's  island. 

of  Vancouver's  Island,  was,  that  no  other  parties 
were  willing  to  do  so,  who  were  possessed  of  suffi- 
cient means  for  its  accomplishment. 

The  Government,  it  seems,  declined  to  negotiate 
with  any  parties  who  could  not  in  the  first  instance 
shew  that  they  were  possessed  of  capital  sufficient 
to  found  a  colony.  Now  it  would  be  worth 
knowing  whether  the  negotiation  with  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  was  conducted  in  a  similar  manner. 
There  is  no  information  before  the  public  whether 
the  Government  demanded  from  the  Company 
any  account  of  the  capital  which  they  contem- 
plated spending  in  colonization.  This  is  a  most 
important  question ;  because,  if  the  Company  are 
not  going  to  spend  any  money,  or  to  invest  any 
capital  in  the  island,  then  the  reasons  put  forward 
by  the  Colonial  Office  for  not  leaving  the  set- 
tlement of  the  country  to  private  enterprise,  fall 
at  once  to  the  ground.  If  the  Company  are 
not  going  to  lay  out  capital  in  the  task  of  colo- 
nization, they  will  have  no  pecuniary  interest  in 
the  success  and  prosperity  of  the  settlement.  The 
capital  invested  will,  in  that  case,  be  entirely  the 
property  of  individual  emigrants ;  and  one  cannot 
see  why  the  property  of  the  soil,  and  the  manage- 
ment of  the  public  funds  derived  from  the  sale  of 


Vancouver's  island.  255 

land,  and  from  the  royalty  on  the  coal,  should  be 
vested  in  a  Company  who  have  no  pecuniary 
interest  in  the  enterprise,  instead  of  in  a  Govern- 
ment responsible  to  the  settlers,  whose  interest  it  is 
to  see  that  the  public  money  is  expended  for  the 
benefit  of  the  community. 

The  Company,  moreover,  are  to  have  the  exclu- 
sive privilege  of  working  all  the  mines  in  the  countrj', 
coal,  metals,  &c.  It  is  not  easy  to  see  why  this 
privilege  is  to  be  taken  away  from  the  settlers. 
There  is  no  such  restriction  upon  the  enterprise  of 
emigrants  in  other  colonies  ;  why,  then,  should  there 
be  in  Vancouver's  Island  ?  The  Company  are  not 
boimd  by  their  Charter  to  allow  the  settlers,  or  to 
allow  any  one,  to  work  the  mines  at  all ;  and  it  will 
be  a  matter  of  grace  if  they  give  such  permission, 
even  upon  the  payment  of  a  royalty.  If  the  object 
in  view  be  the  foimdation  of  a  colony,  it  is  difl&cult 
to  see  how  that  object  is  promoted,  by  putting  such 
restrictions  upon  the  colonists.  And  even  supposing 
that  it  were  thought  right  that  a  part  of  the  wealth 
derived  from  the  mineral  resources  of  the  country 
should  be  devoted  to  the  public  advancement  of  the 
colony,  it  is  not  easy  to  see  any  good  reason  why 
the  disposal  of  these  public  funds  should  not  have 
been  entrusted  to  the  local  Government — ^a  Govern- 


256  Vancouver's  island. 

ment  responsible  to  those  for  whose  interest  the 
money  ought  to  be  held  in  trust, — instead  of  to  a 
Company  whose  Direction  is  in  London,  and  which 
is  wholly  irresponsible,  either  to  the  colonists,  or  to 
the  British  Parliament. 

But  we  have  lately  been  informed  that  the  Com- 
pany do  intend  to  invest  capital  in  the  new  colony. 
Indeed,  since  the  only  reason  for  refusing  to  permit 
the  island  to  be  colonized  by  private  enterprise  was, 
that  capital  was  not  forthcoming,  we  may  assume 
that  Her  Majesty's  Government  have  obtained  some 
guarantee  from  the  Company  that  they  are  going  to 
invest  some  capital  in  the  enterprise. 

There  is  ample  evidence,  in  the  foregoing  pages, 
that  it  would  be  absurd  to  give  this  Company  credit 
for  unproductive  patriotism. 

The  case  stands  thus : — The  Company  have  a 
certain  amount  of  capital  engaged  in  carrying  on 
the  fur  trade.  Are  they  going  to  withdraw  this 
capital  from  the  fur  trade,  and  to  expend  it  in 
colonization?  If  so,  to  what  do  they  look  for  a 
remuneration  ?  They  cannot  withdraw  capital  from 
a  trade  which  pays  a  good  dividend,  and  invest  it 
in  another  speculation,  without  some  expectation 
that  their  profits  will  be  at  least  as  great  as 
before.     Now,  whence  are  they  to  obtain  a  return 


Vancouver's  island.  257 

for  the  money  expended  in  colonization  ?  Obviously, 
it  must  come,  in  some  shape  or  another,  out  of  the 
pockets  of  the  colonists.  Whatever  capital  the 
Company  spend  on  the  colony,  must  be  considered 
in  the  light  of  a  public  or  national  debt  on  the  colony. 
It  is  a  national  debt  imposed  on  the  colonists,  with- 
out their  consent,  and  in  tlie  expenditure  of  which 
they  have  not  been  consulted,  and  over  the  interest 
payable  upon  which  they  are  to  have  no  control. 
This  is  a  very  important  point,  because  it  brings  the 
question  to  this  issue  :  either,  on  the  one  hand,  the 
Company  are  not  going  to  invest  capital  in  the 
island,  in  which  case  there  is  no  conceivable  reason 
why  they  should  be  entrusted  with  its  management ; 
or  they  are  going  to  spend  such  capital,  and  they 
must  obtain  a  retimi,  in  some  way  or  other,  out  of 
the  pockets  of  the  colonists. 

It  is  a  sound  maxim,  to  which  there  ought  to  be 
no  exception,  that  if  it  be  necessary  for  the  first 
establishment  of  the  colony,  that  capital  be  advanced 
in  the  form  of  a  public  debt  on  the  community  about 
to  be  formed,  the  expenditure  of  that  capital  should 
be  entrusted  to  parties,  responsible  to  those  for 
whose  benefit  the  money  was  borrowed  and  who  are 
to  be  saddled  with  the  payment  of  the  interest. 

But  this  maxim  is  directly  violated  by  placing 

8 


258  Vancouver's  island. 

the  disposal  of  the  public  money  in  the  hands  of  a 
Corporation  who  are  not  obliged  to  render  an  ac- 
count to  any  one,  of  the  manner  in  which  they  have 
fulfilled  their  trust. 

It  would  appear,  then,  that  upon  either  of  these 
two  suppositions,  that  the  Company  are,  or  that  they 
are  not,  going  to  invest  capital  in  the  colony,  the 
result  may  possibly  be  equally  disastrous  to  the  set- 
tlers and  colonists.  For,  if  they  are  not  about  to  possess 
a  pecuniary  interest  in  the  settlement,  it  is  impossible 
to  conceive  any  one  duty  which  would  not  be  per- 
formed far  more  efficiently  by  agents  of  the  local 
Government  than  by  servants  of  the  Company ;  and, 
on  the  other  hand,  if  they  are  about  to  lend  capital 
upon  the  security  of  the  colony, — if  they  are  to  be 
the  accredited  Jews  to  the  new  colony,  the  settlers 
ought,  at  least,  to  have  a  voice  in  the  disposal  of  the 
debt,  of  which  they  will,  in  some  shape  or  other, 
be  made  to  pay  the  interest. 

There  is  another  and  very  serious  evil  which  may 
result  from  having  entrusted  the  supreme  authority 
and  influence  in  the  new  colony  to  a  Company  which 
may  be  considered  to  be  themselves  partners  in  the 
concern. 

Most  of  our  readers  who  have  taken  any  interest 
in  this  question  are  aware  of  the   existence  of  a 


Vancouver's  island.  259 

Company  called  "  TJie  Puget's  Sound  Agricultural 
Association ;"  this  is  a  Company  which  was  formed 
a  few  years  ago  for  the  pm'pose  of  carrying  on 
agricultm-al  operations  upon  the  shores  of  Puget's 
Sound,  in  the  Oregon  territory.  It  may  be  con- 
sidered to  be  almost  identical  with  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company.  Its  officers  are  the  same ;  and,  I 
believe,  its  servants  are  the  same  ;  and  it  is  under- 
stood that  the  shareholders  are  for  the  most  part 
the  same.  The  interests  of  the  two  may  be  deemed 
to  be  identical. 

The  farms  of  the  Association  are  situated  on  the 
south  side  of  the  boundary  line,  in  what  is  now  the 
American  territory;  and  the  Government  of  the 
United  States  is  about  to  purchase  all  the  lands 
which  have  been  brought  into  cultivation  by  the 
Association,  according  to  an  arrangement  which 
was  provided  by  the  treaty  which  settled  the 
boimdary. 

It  is  the  intention  of  this  Association  to  remove 
its  operations  to  Vancouver's  Island.  All  the 
farmers  and  servants  will  be  at  once  transported 
thither,  and  the  capital  paid  by  the  United  States 
for  the  improvements  about  Puget's  Soimd  will,  no 
doubt,  be  available  for  commencing  operations  in 
Vancouver's  Island. 

8  2 


260  Vancouver's  island. 

In  the  Prospectus  which  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany have  published  of  the  terms  upon  which 
land  is  to  be  disposed  of  to  settlers  in  the  island, 
it  appears  that  the  price  is  to  be  £1  per  acre ; 
and  that  three  families,  or  six  single  men,  are 
to  be  conveyed  to  the  colony  at  the  expense  of 
the  purchaser,  for  every  hundred  acres  of  land 
purchased. 

It  is  a  matter  of  importance  to  know  whether  the 
Hudson's  Bay  Company  is  about  to  submit  itself, 
and  its  other  self — the  Puget's  Sound  Association — 
to  the  same  regulations  which  are  to  be  imposed 
upon  other  settlers.  Is  the  Company  going  to  allot 
land  to  itself,  or  to  the  Association,  without  paying 
to  the  public  funds  of  the  colony  £1  per  acre  for 
all  the  land  so  allotted  ?  Because,  if  not,  a  great 
injustice  will  manifestly  be  done  to  all  the  other 
colonists.  The  £1  per  acre  is  to  provide  a  fund 
to  be  held  in  trust  for  the  benefit  of  all,  to  which 
fund  all  who  share  those  benefits  should  equally 
contribute. 

But  here,  at  once,  the  strange  and  anomalous 
position  which  the  Company  is  to  occupy  becomes 
apparent ;  for  as  they  are  not  made  answerable  to 
the  colonists  for  the  money  received  on  account 
of  the  land  sold,  there  does  not  seem  to  be  any 


Vancouver's  island.  261 

check  against  their  allotting  to  themselves,  or  to 
their  double — the  Association,  as  much  land  as 
they  find  convenient,  free  of  all  charge.  The 
result  will  be  exactly  the  same  as  if  they  had 
granted  themselves  an  immunity  from  the  payment 
of  the  public  taxes. 

It  is  of  the  highest  importance  tliat  public  atten- 
tion should  be  drawn  to  these  facts ;  that  if  any 
men  of  independent  capital  contemplate  emigi-ating 
under  the  auspices  of  the  Company,  they  should 
know  clearly  under  what  disadvantages  they  will  pro- 
bably labour.  And,  with  that  view,  they  ought  to 
know  something  of  the  nature  of  the  operations  which 
the  Puget's  Sound  Association  carry  on,  and  of  the 
system  of  colonization  which  has  been  hitherto  adopted. 
It  holds  the  land  in  its  own  hand,  as  landlord  :  it 
employs  labourers,  under  the  direction  of  agents : 
these  labourers  are  described  as  being  in  an  ex- 
tremely degraded  condition ;  they  are  generally 
selected  from  amongst  the  poorest  class  of  the  popu- 
lation of  the  Orkney  Islands,  and  are  said  to  be  kept 
completely  in  the  position  of  serfs.  The  whole 
proceeds  of  the  farms,  after  paying  the  expenses  of 
cultivation,  are  divided  amongst  tlie  Shareholders 
of  the  Association's  Stock  in  this  country. 

Now,  tlie  first  manifest  objection  to  this  mode  of 


262  Vancouver's  island. 

colonizing  is,  that  it  is  a  complete  system  of  absentee- 
landlordism.  It  is  obvious  that  no  social  system  can 
be  constructed,  no  civilization  can  be  attained,  where 
the  v,'hole  mass  of  the  population  are  in  the  condition 
of  serfs ;  and  the  upper  classes  of  society,  who  are 
enjoying  the  profits  which  arise  from  the  labour  of  the 
colonists,  are  living  fourteen  or  fifteen  thousand  miles 
away  from  the  spot.  Is  it  likely  that  a  colony  where 
any  large  part  of  the  land  is  under  such  a  system, 
will  become  very  attractive  to  men  of  education, 
and  of  any  independent  property  ? 

Again,  the  Puget's  Sound  Association  have  an 
export  trade  in  different  kinds  of  agricultural  pro- 
duce, with  which  they  supply  the  Russian  settle- 
ments towards  the  north,  and  in  wool,  which  they 
send  to  England. 

Now  considering  the  identity  existing  between 
this  Association  and  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
in  whose  hands  the  whole  management  of  the  colo- 
nization of  Vancouver's  Island  is  placed,  there  is  a 
very  strong  reason  to  fear  that  the  arrangements 
which  have  been  made,  will,  for  some  years  at 
any  rate,  utterly  ruin  that  country  as  a  field  for 
colonial  enterprise. 

There  is  a  strong  inducement  for  the  Company  to 
grant  all  the  best  part  of  the  island  to  themselves. 


Vancouver's  island.  263 

under  the  name  of  the  Puget's  Sound  Association ; 
and  to  trust  to  the  settlements  which  may  be  formed 
by  that  Association,  as  being  sufficient  to  satisfy 
the  obligation  to  colonize  which  is  imposed  by  the 
Charter.  There  is  a  strong  inducement  to  dis- 
courage the  immigration  of  independent  settlers  ;  first, 
because  when  all  the  colonists  are  in  the  position  of 
their  own  servants,  they  will  be  able  much  more 
readily  to  prevent  interference  with  the  fur  trade ; 
and,  secondly,  because  the  presence  of  private  capital 
in  the  island  could  only  tend  to  diminish  their  own 
gains,  derived  from  the  export  of  agricultural  pro- 
duce. And,  on  tlie  other  hand,  there  will  be  every 
possible  discouragement  to  emigrants  of  the  better 
class  to  settle  in  a  colony  where  a  large  part  of  the 
country  will  be  peopled  only  by  the  lowest  order  of 
workmen — where  they  may  have  to  compete  with 
the  capital  of  a  wealthy  Company,  and  that  Company 
not  only  their  rival  in  trade,  but  at  the  same  time 
possessed  of  the  supreme  power,  and  of  paramount 
political  influence  in  the  colony. 

Certainly,  it  does  seem  very  unlikely  that,  as 
long  as  there  are  other  colonies  to  go  to,  any  man 
with  money  in  his  pocket  and  brains  in  his  head, 
will  go  to  Vancouver's  Island. 

There  is  yet  another  part  of  the  grant  which  has 


2G4  Vancouver's  island. 

been  made,  which  demands  especial  notice :  it  is 
that  clause  whereby  the  Crown  reserves  the  right  to 
purchase  back  the  island,  at  the  same  time  when 
the  Licence  of  exclusive  Trade  over  the  Indian  Ter- 
ritories shall  expire,  "  in  consideration  of  payment 
being  made  to  the  said  Governor  and  Company,  of 
the  sum  or  sums  of  money  theretofore  laid  out  and 
expended  hy  them,  in  and  upon  the  said  island  and 
premises,  and  of  the  value  of  their  establishments, 
property,  and  effects,  then  being  thereon." 

Now  the  only  single  excuse  for  granting  Van- 
couver's Island  to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company 
was,  that  the  colonization  would,  by  that  means,  be 
effected  without  expense  to  this  country. 

That  promise  has  not  been  kept :  for  it  now 
appears  that  the  payment  is  only  postponed  for  ten 
years. 

Suppose  for  a  moment, — and  it  is  not  at  all  unlikely 
to  happen,  —  that,  in  the  year  1859,  when  the 
Licence  of  exclusive  Trade  shall  expire,  it  may  be  a 
matter  of  the  greatest  importance  to  take  the  island 
from  imder  the  power  and  influence  of  the  Com- 
pany ; — suppose,  for  example,  that  their  government 
is  so  bad,  that  if  it  be  not  put  an  end  to,  the 
colonists  will  revolt,  and  throw  themselves  into  the 
arms  of    the  Americans :   according  to  the  above 


Vancouver's  island.  265 

clause,  the  only  way  in  which  it  will  be  possible  to 
get  rid  of  the  government  of  the  Company,  will  be, 
by  buying  them  out  at  their  oiim  price.  The  event, 
in  that  case,  would  be,  that  England,  instead  of 
having  bought  a  good  colony  for  ready  money,  will 
have  given  her  acceptance,  to  an  unlimited  amount,  for 
what  is  likely  to  prove,  after  all,  a  very  bad  article. 

This  clause  of  re-purchase  may  operate  as  a 
positive  incentive  or  bribe  to  the  Company  to  govern 
badly. 

The  Company  are  not  only  to  be  the  lords 
paramount  in  the  colony,  but  they  are  likely  also,  it 
would  seem,  to  be  colonists,  or  farmers,  in  the  island. 
They  are  to  have  "  establishments  "  there.  Now, 
suppose  they  lay  out  their  money  foolishly ; — suppose 
the  investments  which  they  make  will  not  pay :  of 
course,  in  this  case,  it  will  be  their  object  to  get 
their  money  back  again,  and  to  force  the  Government 
to  purchase  the  island  imder  the  above  clause :  that 
is  to  say,  we  have  put  it  in  the  power  of  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company  to  speculate  to  any  amount  they  may 
please,  and,  in  case  the  speculation  fails,  to  force 
this  country  to  take  the  bad  bargain  off  their  hands 
at  its  prime  cost.  This  is  the  arrangement  which 
Earl  Grey  has  made.  And  the  manner  in  which 
the  Company  will  be  able  to  force  the  re-purchase 


266  Vancouver's  island. 

of  the  island  will  be,  by  bullying  the  colonists  until 
their  existence  become  no  longer  bearable ;  until 
the  only  question  be,  whether  the  Company  shall  be 
bought  out,  or  the  island  shall  cease  to  remain  a 
British  colony.  These  are  the  prospects  of  good 
government  which  Earl  Grey  has  provided. 

Now  is  it  worth  while  asking,  why  has  the 
Minister  done  these  manifestly  absurd  and  mis- 
chievous actions  ?  A  man  who  had  distinct  views, 
and  an  honest  belief  in  their  soundness,  would 
have  no  difficulty  or  hesitation,  when  the  oppor- 
tunity was  afforded,  in  putting  them  into  language 
or  action.  The  Minister  has  taken  a  very  dif- 
ferent course.  Instead  of  adopting  that  mode  of 
constructing  a  colony  which  he  believed  to  be 
the  right  one,  he  declined  the  trouble  and  the 
responsibility  altogether,  and  handed  the  whole 
affair  over  to  a  third  party,  to  be  done  in  any 
manner  it  might  please  ;  with  the  simple  provision 
that,  if  not  done  at  all,  the  island  should  revert  to 
the  Crown  ;  or,  if  done  badly,  that  it  should  be 
bought  back  at  any  sum  which  their  agents  might 
take  it  into  their  heads  to  throw  away. 

The  Minister  has  publicly  declared  by  this  con- 
duct, that  he  is  possessed  of  no  distinct  guiding 
principles  in  respect  to  colonization.    Let  the  public 


Vancouver's  island.  267 

judge  whether  such  a  Minister  is  fit  to  preside  over 
the  vast  colonial  interests  of  this  empire. 

But  I  have  not  done  with  this  clause  as  to  the 
right  of  re-purchase.  There  is  another  very  serious 
question  connected  with  it.  Where  is  this  money 
to  come  from,  which  is  to  pay  for  the  re-purchase  of 
the  island  ?  The  words  of  the  Deed  are,  that  the 
payment  is  to  be  made  "  by  us,  our  heirs,  or  suc- 
cessors." Lord  Grey  has  imdertaken  that  the 
Crown  shall  pay  this  money — ^be  it  what  it  may,  on 
demand.  But  Lord  Grey  is  perfectly  aware  that 
the  Crown  is  in  possession  of  no  funds  whatsoever 
for  meeting  such  an  engagement ;  and  Lord  Grey 
could  not  have  contemplated  that  the  payment 
should  be  made  out  of  the  property  of  the  Crown. 
Then,  where  can  it  come  from  hxxt  from  Parliament 
—from  this  country/  ?  The  Minister  then  has  ventured 
to  pledge  this  country  to  the  payment  of  money, 
without  asking  the  permission  of  Parliament  to  do 
90.  It  is  impossible  to  believe  tliat  the  House  of 
Commons  will  tamely  submit  to  this  infringement 
of  their  most  peculiar  and  sacred  prerogative ;  or 
that  they  will  hesitate  to  chastise  the  Minister  who 
has  abused  the  confidence  of  the  Crown,  by  such 
unconstitutional  counsels. 

There  is  a  reason,  more  important  than  all,  why 


268  Vancouver's  island. 

the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  will  never  be  able  to 
form  a  colony.  An  agricultural  settlement  they 
may  establish ;  a  few  forts,  where  Scotchmen  will 
grumble  for  a  few  years  before  they  go  over  to  the 
Americans — ^but  never  a  community  that  will 
deserve  the  name  of  a  British  colony.  They  do  not 
possess  public  confidence.  It  is  a  false  and  foolish 
notion  that  nothing  but  money  is  wanting  to  make 
a  colony.  You  must  have  men,  as  well  as  money. 
No  number  of  dollars  will  make  a  man,  nor  even  a 
tailor;  but  you  cannot  make  a  colony  without 
men. 

English  gentlemen  will  not  quit  their  own  country 
for  colonies,  whence  so  many  in  the  last  few  years 
have  returned,  poorer  and  sadder  than  they  went ; 
whence  complaints  must  circumnavigate  the  globe 
to  be  heard,  and  redress  rarely  survives  the  voyage 
back.  It  is  now  a  matter  of  public  knowledge  and 
public  faith,  that  the  root  of  all  evils  in  our  colonial 
system  is,  that  the  local  government  is  not  respon- 
sible to  the  people  over  which  they  preside — that  is 
to  say,  is  not  responsible  at  all.  This  opinion  was 
a  matter  of  belief  to  many  before  the  publication  of 
Mr.  Gibbon  Wakefield's  "Art  of  Colonization."  It 
is  now  a  matter  of  demonstration  to  all. 

It  is,  therefore,  a  matter  of  great  wonder,  that 


Vancouver's  island.  269 

the  Minister,  who,  of  all  public  men,  was  most 
deeply  pledged  to  the  principle  of  responsible 
government  in  the  colonies,  should  have  committed 
the  destinies  of  the  only  colony  over  whose  birth  it 
fell  to  his  lot  to  preside,  to  the  care  of  a  Cor- 
poration more  entirely  irresponsible  in  its  nature 
and  constitution,  than  any  public  or  private  body  in 
the  empire — a  Corporation  enriched  by  the  enjoy- 
ment of  monopoly,  and  trained  to  the  exercise  of 
despotism. 

Lord  Grey  may,  indeed,  have  fancied  that  he  was 
following  the  example  of  ancient  times,  in  granting 
a  Charter  to  a  Company,  and  committing  to  it 
the  colonization  of  the  country.  It  is  quite  true 
that  the  best  colonies  were  founded  by  Chartered 
Companies  ;  but,  in  effect,  those  companies  were  the 
colonists.  The  whole  virtue  of  those  charters  con- 
sisted in  the  delegation  of  powers  of  local  govern- 
ment. But  what  is  the  case  now  ?  The  worst  and 
most  mischievous  feature  in  the  Colonial  Office 
system  is  left,  viz.,  its  enormous  distance  from  the 
country  which  it  governs ;  and  its  entire  independ- 
ence of  the  colonists.  The  only  effect  of  the  pre- 
sent Charter  is,  to  remove  the  governing  power  from 
Downing  Street  to  Fenchurch  Street.  The  Hud- 
son's Bay  House  is  to  be  the  Colonial  Office  of 


270  Vancouver's  island. 

Vancouver's  Island  ;  but  a  more  noxious  Colonial 
Office,  for  this  reason  : — the  Downing  Street  Go- 
vernment is,  at  most,  simply  indifferent  to  the  work 
of  colonization.  It  has  no  natural  antipatliy  to 
emigration,  except  that  it  gives  more  trouble.  But 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company — the  Colonial  Office  of 
this  unfortunate  new  colony — has  positive  interests 
antagonistic  to  those  of  an  independent  settlement. 
It  is  a  body  whose  history,  tendency,  tradition,  and 
prospects,  are  equally  and  utterly  opposed  to  the 
existence  within  its  hunting  grounds,  of  an  active, 
healthy,  independent,  and  flourishing  colony,  with 
all  the  destructive  consequences  of  ruined  monopoly 
and  wide-spreading  civilization. 

It  is  a  wrong  idea,  that  the  recent  discoveries  of 
gold  in  California  will  injure  the  prospects  of  Van- 
couver's Island  as  a  colony :  it  may  do  so,  just  for 
the  moment.  Had  those  "various  parties"  to  whom 
the  Colonial  Minister  alluded  last  session  as  having 
been  desirous  of  emigrating  to  Vancouver's  Island 
more  than  a  year  ago,  been  encouraged  to  carry 
their  designs  into  execution ;  had  they  been  put  into 
communication  with  one  another,  instead  of  having 
been  all  referred  to  a  Company  whom  they  did  not, 
and  could  not,  and  will  not,  trust,  the  crops  which 
they  might  now  have  been  raising  in  Vancouver's 


Vancouver's  island.  271 

Island  would  have  been  selling  for  their  weight  in 
gold  on  the  Califomian  coast.  But,  apart  from  this, 
the  colony  in  Vancouver's  Island  must  succeed,  if 
relieved  from  the  banefrd  presence  of  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company.  The  sources  of  prosperity  in  Cali- 
fornia are  probably  temporary ;  those  in  Vancouver's 
Island,  permanent.  They  depend,  for  the  most 
part,  on  its  geographical  position,  upon  its  climate, 
suited  to  tlie  English  constitution  and  habits,  its 
harbours,  its  soil,  its  mineral  resources,  upon  its 
being  the  nearest  point  on  the  coast  to  the  head 
waters  of  the  Saskatchewan  River,  and,  therefore, 
the  terminus  of  the  great  route  which  it  would  be 
the  wisdom,  and  will,  ere  long,  be  the  task,  of  Great 
Britain  to  establish  across  the  continent  of  North 
America,  connecting  the  oceans  that  wash  its  oppo- 
site shores. 

Had  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  been  what  they 
now  pretend  to  be,  and  what  the  Minister  would 
have  us  to  believe  them  to  be — possessed,  as  they  are, 
of  unlimited  power,  and,  as  they  ought  to  be,  of 
accurate  information,  these  schemes  of  imperial 
importance  would  long  ago  have  been  attempted,  or 
at  least  proposed,  if  not  executed :  they  are  even 
now  brought  before  the  public,  not  by  the  Company, 
but  in  spite  of  it.      But  the  secrecy  which  has 


272  Vancouver's  island. 

hitherto  shrouded  the  transactions  of  that  body  is  no 
more  :  the  mysterious  obscurity  of  their  dominions 
has  been  invaded.  Even  should  their  territorial 
property  on  the  eastern  shores  of  the  continent 
escape,  for  a  time,  the  storm  which  a  grasping  policy 
has  conjured  up  upon  the  coasts  of  the  Pacific,  at  any 
rate  their  days  are  numbered.  Over  the  Indian 
Territories  their  existence  will  terminate  with  the 
Licence  of  exclusive  Trade,  in  about  ten  years ;  and 
it  seems  not  unlikely,  that,  working  under  the  eye 
and  under  the  criticism  of  a  public  daily  becoming 
more  intolerant  of  a  faulty,  because  conscious  of  its 
increasing  need  of  a  soimd  and  healthy,  colonial 
system,  this  Company  may  find  the  last  ten  years  of 
its  life  much  like  those  which  are  said  to  be  the  lot 
of  the  human  race — ""  but  labour  and  trouble." 
The  Company  have  undertaken  to  colonize  Van- 
couver's Island  ;  and  colonize  it  now,  they  must,  and 
shall,  or  give  it  up  to  those  who  will  do  so. 

But,  it  will  be  asked,  what  should  the  Minister 
have  done  ?  If  there  really  were  no  funds  forthcom- 
ing to  found  the  proposed  colony ;  and  if  the  Company 
offered  to  do  so, — did  not  the  Minister  take  the  only 
course  that  was  open  to  him  ?  That  is  his  defence. 
The  reply  is  simple.  The  Company  should  be  put 
out  of  the  question  altogether,    because   it  were 


Vancouver's  island.  273 

better  that  the  island  should  remain  simply  unin- 
habited and  uncultivated,  with  the  prospect  of  some 
future  opportunity  occurring  for  settling  it,  than 
that  it  should  be  placed  under  an  authority  which 
is  necessarily  hostile  to  colonization,  and  whose 
promises  are  not  to  be  trusted. 

The  class  of  persons  who  would  found  the  best 
colony,  are  young  men  of  birth,  intelligence,  and 
education,  and  who  possess  a  limited  capital,  but  not 
sufficient  to  enable  them  to  live  independently  in  this 
country.  There  are  crowds  of  this  class.  The  task 
of  framing  a  new  colony  consists  chiefly  in  bringing 
a  considerable  number  of  such  men  together.  This 
can  only  be  done  by  the  proposal  of  such  a  scheme 
as  will  command  their  attention  and  win  their  con- 
fidence. It  must  be,  in  a  great  measure,  a  Govern- 
ment scheme :  that  is,  the  good  local  government 
of  the  colony  must  be  guaranteed  by  the  Crown. 
This  is,  in  fact,  what  the  home  Government  have  to 
do.  The  Colonial  Office  ought  to  have  nothing  to  do 
with  capital.  If  a  man  goes  to  a  colony,  it  is  pre- 
sumed that  he  has  the  means,  or  that  it  is  worth  his 
while  to  go  there.  It  is  no  business  of  the  Govern- 
ment whether  he  has  means  or  not.  All  that 
Government  has  to  do,  and  ought  to  do,  is  to  pro- 
vide that  the  settler  shall  not  be  impeded  in  his 

T 


274  Vancouver's  island. 

operations  by  ruinous  restrictions  and  absurd  regula- 
tions, that  the  law  shall  be  administered,  and  that 
life  and  property  shall  be  respected.  If  the  Govern- 
ment will  provide  for  these  things,  it  may  leave  the 
question  oi  capital,  and  means,  to  be  decided  by  the 
colonists  themselves, 

I  will  suppose  that  a  few  young  men,  of  the  class 
described,  contemplate  the  formation  of  a  new 
colony :  they  select  a  spot  which  they  foresee  will 
in  a  few  years  become  a  most  important  position. 
They  do  not  pretend  to  possess  what  are  called 
"  means,"  but  what  they  have  they  are  willing  to 
risk  in  the  prosecution  of  their  design ;  and  they 
have  entire  faith  in  the  soundness  of  their  views — in 
their  own  energy,  their  zeal,  their  determination  to 
succeed.  They  believe,  moreover,  that  they  will 
be  able  to  call  around  them  a  sufficient  number  of 
their  own  class  in  life  to  secure  the  success  of  their 
undertaking. 

I  will  suppose  that  they  apply  to  the  Colonial 
Office,  state  their  views,  and  request  the  patronage  of 
the  Government,  without  which  they  know  it  will 
be  impossible  to  obtain  the  confidence  of  the  public, 
or  to  offer  a  guarantee  for  the  success  of  their 
enterprise. 

They  do  not  ask  for  assistance,  pecuniary  or  other- 


Vancouver's  island.  275 

wise  ;  all  they  ask  is,  to  be  told  what  the  Govern- 
ment will  do  in  the  event  of  their  design  being 
carried  into  execution. 

I  will  suppose  that  the  Minister  for  the  Colonies 
is  a  man  with  whom  the  interests  of  the  empire  are 
of  deeper  moment  than  the  stale  and  trite  forms  of 
official  language  ;  and  that,  possessing  distinct  and 
straightforward  views,  he  does  not  perceive  why  he 
should  not  state  them  in  an  honest  and  intelligible 
manner. 

I  will  suppose  such  a  Minister  to  receive  such  a 
communication,  with  respect  to  founding  a  new 
colony — for  example,  in  Vancouver's  Island. 

What  reply  ought  he  to  make  ?  It  is  possible 
some  such  as  the  following. 

"  Your  letter  has  received  the  best  consideration 
of  Her  Majesty's  Government, 

"  Her  Majesty's  Government  are  deeply  sensible 
of  the  importance  of  the  early  formation  of  a  British 
settlement  upon  the  coast  of  the  Pacific,  and  of 
the  peculiar  advantages  which  Vancouver's  Island 
aflfords  for  such  a  purpose,  and  therefore  learn,  with 
much  pleasure,  that  the  subject  is  engaging  the  atten- 
tion of  gentlemen  of  intelligence  and  education. 

"  Every  facility,  which  it  is  in  tlie  power  of  this 
office  to  afford,  will  be  placed  at  the  disposal  of 

t2 


276  Vancouver's  island. 

those  who  are  about  to  unite  for  the  purpose  of 
forming  such  a  settlement  in  Vancouver's  Island. 

"  At  the  same  time,  Her  Majesty's  Government 
would  not  think  it  right  to  propose  that  any  gi'ant  of 
public  money  should  be  made  in  aid  of  the  founda- 
tion of  a  new  colony. 

"  Her  Majesty's  Government,  deeming  it  of  the 
highest  importance  that  every  encouragement  should 
be  afforded  to  individuals  who  may  desire  to  emi- 
grate without  delay  to  Vancouver's  Island,  and  with 
a  view  to  remove  all  difficulties  which  might  tend  to 
damp  the  spirit  of  ardour  and  enterprise  which  are 
essential  to  the  successful  foundation  of  a  new 
colony,  take  the  earliest  opportunity  of  stating,  for 
the  information  of  all  who  may  be  induced  to  embark 
in  the  proposed  expedition,  the  course  which  will  be 
adopted  respecting  the  allotment  and  conveyance  of 
land,  and  the  establishment  of  the  requisite  govern- 
ment in  the  island. 

"The  Hudson's  Bay  Company  have  formed  a  set- 
tlement upon  the  south  side  of  Vancouver's  Island, 
and  have  brought  some  land  under  cultivation  ;  and 
I  have  signified  to  the  Governor  of  that  Company, 
that  they  will  be  confirmed  in  the  possession  of 
all  lands  which  they  have  actually  occupied  and 
cultivated. 


Vancouver's  island.  277 

"  The  same  course  will  therefore  be  pursued  with 
regard  to  any  other  of  Her  Majesty's  subjects  who 
may  think  proper  to  settle  in  Vancouver's  Island, 
prior  to  the  establishment  of  a  regular  government 
in  the  country.  All  settlers  will  be  confirmed  in 
the  possession  of  lands  which  they  shall  have  actually 
occupied,  and  brought  into  agricultural  use. 

"  In  order  to  avoid  all  future  disputes  respecting 
the  occupation  of  lands,  the  Governor  of  the  island, 
who  will  be  appointed  as  soon  as  any  regular  settle- 
ments shall  have  been  made,  will  be  invested  with 
full  authority,  as  Her  Majesty's  Commissioner,  to 
decide  what  lands  shall  have  been  actually  occupied 
and  brought  into  agricultiu'al  use,  previously  to  his 
arrival  in  the  colony,  and  to  determine  and  adjust 
all  claims  according  to  the  true  spirit  and  intent  of 
this  letter. 

"  Any  individuals,  therefore,  who  may  proceed  to 
the  island  at  once,  will  be  permitted  to  possess  them- 
selves, free  of  all  charge,  of  whatever  land  they  may 
have  the  means  of  occupying :  and  as  soon  as  a 
Governor  shall  arrive  in  the  island,  they  will  re- 
ceive a  good  title  to  all  lands  which  shall  have  been 
actually  brought  into  agricultural  use. 

"  Until  such  Governor  shall  be  appointed,  it  will 
be  lawful  for  any  settlers  to  procure  and  dispose,  for 


278  Vancouver's  island. 

their  own  profit,  of  any  coals,  metals,  or  minerals, 
which  may  exist  or  be  discovered  in  the  island  ;  but 
until  a  regular  government  is  established  in  the 
island,  the  property  of  all  such  mines  will  still  re- 
main in  the  Crown ;  and  Her  Majesty's  Govern- 
ment reserve  the  right  of  imposing,  at  any  futiu-e 
period,  such  a  royalty  as  may  be  deemed  necessary 
for  the  benefit  of  the  colony. 

"  The  above  regulations  are  framed  upon  the  idea 
that  a  few  individuals  are  anxious  to  emigrate 
at  once  to  Vancouver's  Island.  Should,  however, 
any  considerable  number  of  settlers  embark,  at  once, 
or  within  a  short  period,  a  Governor  will  be 
immediately  appointed,  and  will  be  invested  with 
full  powers  to  act  as  Her  Majesty's  Commissioner 
for  the  disposal  of  the  waste  lands  in  Vancouver's 
Island. 

"  In  this  event,  it  will  probably  be  considered 
advisable  to  exact  the  payment  of  a  sufficient  price 
for  the  land,  and  of  a  certain  royalty  on  all  metals 
and  minerals,  so  as  to  provide  for  the  conveyance 
of  the  requisite  amount  of  labom*  to  the  island,  and 
of  those  other  expenses  incidental  to  the  formation 
of  a  colony,  which  will  have  to  be  defrayed  out  of 
some  general  fund  ;  and  instructions  will,  in  that 
case,  be  given  to  the  Colonial  Land  and  Emigration 


Vancouver's  island.  279 

Commissioners,  to  conduct  the  emigration  of  labour 
to  Vancouver's  Island  in  the  same  manner  as  to 
the  other  British  colonies  to  which  free  emigration 
is  carried  on. 

"You  will  also  receive  the  assurance  of  Her 
Majesty's  Government,  that,  as  soon  as  a  sufficient 
number  of  colonists  shall  have  settled  in  the  island, 
to  afford  a  reasonable  prospect  of  the  success  of 
the  colony,  and  a  satisfactory  representation  is 
made  that  such  a  course  would  meet  the  wishes  of 
the  colonists  themselves.  Her  Majesty  will  grant 
a  Charter  of  Incorporation  to  the  colony,  by  which 
a  free  Representative  Government  will  be  secured 
to  it ;  and  Her  Majesty's  Government  will  not 
fail  to  apply  to  Parliament  for  all  the  powers  that 
may  be  necessary  in  order  to  carry  its  intentions 
into  full  effect. 

"The  rights  of  exclusive  trade,  which  are  at 
present  enjoyed  by  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company, 
will  be  recalled,  as  far  as  they  extend  to  Vancouver's 
Island,  in  pursuance  of  the  clause  in  the  Licence  of 
exclusive  Trade  over  the  Indian  Territories,  pro- 
vided for  that  purpose. 

"  In  order  that  the  views  of  Her  Majesty's  Govern- 
ment may  be  known  as  extensively  as  possible,  I 
shall  have  much  pleasure  in  putting  you  in  com- 


280  Vancouver's  island. 

munication  with  all  the  parties  who  have  applied  to 
this  Office  with  a  similar  object  to  that  which  was 
the  subject  of  your  communication. 

"  In  case  a  small  party  of  emigrants  should  be 
desirous  of  sailing  at  once  upon  the  terms  specified 
in  this  letter,  it  will  be  advisable  to  invest  one  or 
more  of  the  leaders  of  the  party,  with  magisterial 
authority  for  the  administration  of  the  law  until  a 
regular  government  is  established. 

"  I  have  the  honour  to  be, 

&c.     &c.     &c." 

I  suppose,  if  a  Colonial  Minister  were  to  write 
such  a  letter  as  that,  he  would  be  put  into  a  straight 
waistcoat ;  he  would  have  puzzled  nobody — in  itself 
a  great  crime— and  I  verily  believe  he  would  have 
founded  a  colony. 


CONCLUSION. 


Let  us,  in  conclusion,  take  a  brief  review  of  what 
it  has  been  the  object  of  this  book  to  bring  before 
the  public. 

The  question  at  issue  is  a  serious  one — whether  a 
valuable  territory  shall  be  given  up  to  an  irrespon- 
sible Corporation,  to  be  colonized  or  not,  as  it  may 
suit  their  convenience  ;  or  whether  that  colonization 
shall  be  conducted  in  accordance  with  any  principles 
which  are  recognised  as  sound  and  right? 

The  foregoing  exposure  of  the  character  and 
conduct  of  the  Company  has  been  provoked. 
When  doubts  were  expressed  whether  the  Company 
were  qualified  for  fulfilling  the  tasks  assigned 
to  them  by  the  Colonial  Minister,  and  when  they 
appealed  to  their  character  and  history,  it  became 
right  that  their  history  should  be  examined,  and 
their  character  exposed. 

The  investigation  thus  provoked  has  resulted  in 
the  discovery  that  their  authority  is  fictitious,  and 
their  claims  invalid.  As  their  power  is  illegal,  so 
the  exercise  of  it  has  been  mischievous  :  it  has  been 


282  CONCLUSION. 

mischievous  to  Great  Britain,  leaving  her  to  accom- 
plish, at  a  vast  national  expense,  discoveries  which 
the  Company  midertook,  and  were  paid,  to  perform ; 
and  because  our  trade  has  been  contracted  and 
crippled,  without  any  advantage,  political  or  other, 
having  been  obtained  in  return  :  it  has  been  mis- 
chievous to  the  native  Indians,  cutting  them  off 
from  all  communication  with  the  rest  of  the  civilized 
world,  depriving  them  of  the  fair  value  of  their 
labour,  keeping  them  in  a  condition  of  slavery,  and 
leaving  them  in  the  same  state  of  poverty,  misery, 
crime,  and  paganism,  in  which  it  originally  foimd 
them :  it  has  been  mischievous  to  the  settlers  and 
colonists  under  its  influence,  depriving  them  of  their 
liberties  as  British  subjects,  frustrating,  by  exactions 
and  arbitrary  regulations,  their  efforts  to  advance  ; 
and,  above  all,  imdermining  their  loyalty  and 
attachment  to  the  mother  country,  and  fostering,  by 
bad  government,  a  spirit  of  discontent  with  their 
own,  and  sympathy  with  foreign  institutions. 

This  is  the  Company  whose  power  is  now  to  be 
strengthened  and  consolidated ; — to  whose  domi- 
nions is  to  be  added  the  most  important  post  which 
Great  Britain  possesses  in  the  Pacific  ;  and  to  whom 
the  formation  of  a  new  colony  is  to  be  entrusted. 

There  has  been  no  intention  in  the  foregoing 


CONCLUSION.  283 

pages  to  censure,  indiscriminately,  all  the  servants 
in  the  employment  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company. 
No  doubt,  many  of  that  body  are  generous  and 
humane,  as  well  as  enterprising  and  intelligent.  I 
have  spoken  of  a  system,  and  of  its  natural  and 
necessary  consequences,  with  no  other  desire  than 
that  the  truth  should  be  ascertained. 

The  possession  of  a  portion  of  the  earth  as  large 
as  Europe,  peopled  by  tribes  of  human  beings, 
whom  it  has  been  committed  to  us  to  regenerate  or  to 
annihilate,  must  ever  be  a  very  solemn  consideration. 

And  when  we  ask.  Are  we  doing  what  is  right 
and  honest  by  these  wandering  savages,  whose 
keepers  we  are  ?  it  is  not  the  sort  of  answer  we 
should  receive, — "  These  tribes  are  predestinated 
savages  ;  they  do  not  improve,  because  they  cannot 
improve :  it  is  very  well  for  them  that  they  are 
not  utterly  exterminated;  as  to  their  country,  it 
is  not  worth  your  curiosity ;  it  is  uninhabitable ; 
it  is  only  fit  for  us  to  hunt  furs  in  1 "  There  is 
sometliing  suspicious  and  painful  in  this  sort  of 
reply  ;  something  this  country  will  not  be  satisfied 
with. 

Of  all  the  savage  races  with  whom  we  have 
come  in  contact,  the  North  American  Indian  has, 
perhaps,   the   largest  claim   upon   our    sympathy. 


284  CONCLUSION. 

Invested  with  qualities  of  mind  and  character  kin- 
dred to  those  which  the  purest  philosophy  and  the 
highest  civilization  recognise  as  noble  in  man,  he 
has  afforded  us  a  new  type  in  poetical  fiction,  and 
has  been  portrayed  as  the  hero  of  romance.     And 
yet,  with  these  qualities,  common  to  himself  and  the 
loftiest  of  his  species,  with  this  bridge,  as  it  were, 
across  the  gulf  which  divides  the  savage  from  civil- 
ized   man,    the  Indian  is    still  roaming  about   his 
forests    and   his  prairies,   nakedly   shivering    that 
we  may  be  warmly  clad,  dying  by  starvation  that 
the   cup  of  our  luxury  may  be  filled.     Civiliza- 
tion has   been  to  him,   not  the  sun  that  warms, 
but  the  lightning  that  scorches :  under  its  influence, 
instead   of  growing  and   advancing  in   the   scale 
of  humanity,   the  North   American  Indian  seems 
to  have  shrivelled  still  farther  into  the   very  de- 
crepitude of  barbarism.     He  is  losing  the  ancient 
traditions   of  his  race  —  a   fatal  symptom  of  ex- 
piring vitality :  he  has  lost  his  native  spirit  of  in- 
dependence— that  great  gift  by  which  Providence 
would  mitigate  the  extreme  penalty  of  barbarism. 
He  is  melting,  tribe   by   tribe,   from  the  face  of 
the   earth,   like   the   snow   of   his    plains    in    the 
summer  time ;  or  is  hanging  in  hopeless  depend- 
ence upon  the  white  strangers  who  have  crushed 


CONCLUSION.  285 

him, — who  have  taken  from  him  all  that  was  his, 
and  given  him  nothuig  that  was  theirs.  This 
man  was  placed,  in  the  counsels  of  Providence,  at 
our  feet.  We  conquered  his  land  by  that  conquest 
which  needs  no  battle — the  civilized  man  over  the 
savage  : — we  hoisted  a  flag,  and  called  the  land  our 
own.  Time  has  been,  we  should  have  enslaved  him  : 
he  might  have  become  a  civilized  slave  :  he  is  now 
both  slave  and  savage.  We  have  given  a  letter  of 
marque  to  our  merchants  to  pillage  the  savage  of 
his  only  wealth.  If  the  Indian  would  receive  more 
for  his  furs,  were  there  competition  in  his  country, 
than  he  is  paid  by  those  who  enjoy  a  monopoly,  he 
is  robbed  of  his  property.  I  know  that  we  have 
done  all  this  by  mistake.  We  were  promised  the 
salvation,  if  not  the  regeneration,  of  the  Indian  race ; 
we  were  promised  that  he  should  no  longer  be  poi- 
soned, and  maddened,  and  cheated,  by  the  fire-water ; 
we  were  promised  that  missionary  enterprise  should 
take  the  place  of  commercial  competition.  But  have 
these  promises  been  kept  ?  Not  a  fraction  of  one. 
Then  what  excuse  shall  be  made  for  a  longer 
sufferance  of  such  a  system  ? 

Is  it  enough  to  say,  (even  supposing  there  were  any 
truth  in  the  statement,)  that  the  Company  has 
"  enriched  our  country  to  the  amount  of  twenty 


286  CONCLUSION. 

millions  sterling  ! "  *  Tell  that  to  the  Indian  !  He 
will  answer,  "  Have  your  riches  been  honestly  come 
by  ? "  In  fair  dealing,  both  parties  are  richer  ; 
both  get  what  they  want ;  but  the  Indians  are  fewer, 
poorer,  and  more  wretched,  than  the  first  day  they 
sold  a  skin  to  a  white  man.  And  all  this  for  what  ? 
for  a  traffic  which  is  to  us  a  mere  luxury  ;  and  in 
point  of  magnitude,  a  mere  trifle — ^less  than  will 
employ  a  thousand  tons  of  shipping  annually. 

If  the  Company  were  to  be  destroyed  to-morrow, 
would  England  be  poorer  ?  would  there  not  rather 
be  demanded  from  the  hands  of  our  own  manufac- 
turers ten  times  the  quantity  of  goods  which  is  sent 
abroad,  under  the  present  system,  to  purchase  the 
skins  ? 

We  boast  that  we  make  no  slaves — we  English- 
men— none  at  least  that  can  taint  our  soil,  or  fret 
our  sight ;  but  we  take  the  child  of  the  forest,  whom 
God  gave  us  to  civilize,  and  commit  him  bound  hand 
and  foot  to  the  most  iron  of  all  despotisms — because 
a  despotism  without  personality  or  conscience — a 
commercial  monolopy. 

Nor,  turning  from  the  results  of  our  policy  upon 
the  native  population,  to  its  effect  upon  settlers  and 
colonists,  is  there  greater  cause  for  congratulation. 

*  Mr.  M.  Martin's  Hudson's  Bay  Company's  Territories,  &c.,  p.  137. 


CONCLUSION.  287 

The  system  which  has  made  the  native  a  slave,  is 
making  the  settler  a  rebel.  Restrictions  upon  trade, 
jealousy  of  its  own  privileges,  interference  with  the 
rights  of  property,  exactions,  and  all  the  other 
freaks  in  which  monopoly  and  despotism  delight  to  • 
indulge,  have,  it  appears,  dri^^n  the  best  settlers 
into  the  American  territory,  and  left  the  rest,  as  it 
were,  packing  up  their  trunks  for  the  journey. 

The  Oregon  terrritory  was  peopled  under  the 
influence  of  the  Company,  with  subjects  of  ihe 
United  States  :*  that  lost  us  the  boundary  of  the 
Columbia  River.  That  is  one  specimen  of  the  colo- 
nization of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company.  The 
boundary  westward  from  the  Lake  of  the  Woods, 
we  have  seen,  gave  to  the  United  States  land  from 
which  the  Company  was  engaged,  at  the  very  time, 
in  driving  out  British  subjects,  on  the  plea  that 

*  Since  writing  the  former  chapter,  I  have  heard  this  account  given 
of  the  conduct  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  in  respect  to  the 
Oregon  boundary,  which  offers  still  stronger  ground  for  inquiry. 
The  country  south  of  the  49th  parallel,  it  seems  was  hunted  up — 
therefore  the  posts  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  were  become 
of  no  value  at  all.  By  annexing  all  that  country  to  the  United 
States,  and  inserting  in  the  treaty  a  clause  that  the  United  States 
should  pay  the  Company  for  all  its  posts  if  it  turned  tliem  out — 
the  Company  were  able  to  obtain  from  the  Americans  a  large  sum  of 
money  for  what  would  have  been  worth  nothing,  bad  the  territory 
remained  British. 


288  CONCLUSION. 

it  belonged  to  the  Company ;  and  now  that  the 
boundary  has  been  settled  only  a  few  years,  we 
learn  that  the  settlers  on  our  side  are  asking  the 
United  States  to  extend  her  government  over  that 
country.  Make  what  lines  you  please  in  a  map  and 
call  them  boundariq^,  but  it  is  a  mockery  to  do  so  as 
long  as  the  inhabitants  are  alienated  from  your  rule, 
as  long  as  you  have  a  Company  in  power,  whose 
policy  erases  the  lines  which  treaties  have  drawn. 

Forasmuch,  then,  as  these  things  are  so,  it 
becomes  this  country  to  record  an  emphatic  protest 
against  the  recent  policy  of  the  Colonial  Office,  in 
abandoning  the  magnificent  country  on  the  shores 
of  the  Pacific  Ocean  to  the  Hudson's  Bay  Com- 
pany. 

The  blindest  cannot  long  avoid  seeing  the  im- 
mense importance  of  Vancouver's  Island  to  Great 
Britain.  Those  who,  two  years  ago,  first  began  to 
attract  public  attention  to  this  question,  are  not  the 
less  amazed  at  the  unexpected  manner  and  rapidity 
with  which  their  anticipations  have  been  realized. 
Six  months  ago,  it  was  a  question  merely  of  colo- 
nizing Vancouver's  Island :  now,  it  is  a  question  in- 
volving the  interests  of  the  whole  of  British  North 
America,  and  of  the  empire  of  Great  Britain  in  the 
Pacific  Ocean. 


CONCLUSION.  289 

AVlien  the  whole  world  is  asking,  what  is  the  best 
route  across  the  continent,  ought  this  country  to 
neglect  the  opportunity  of  opening   the   highway 
through  its  own  territories?     It  is  said  that  there 
are  the  means  of  doing  so.     There  can  hardly  be 
conceived  a  duty  more  incumbent  upon  a  govern- 
ment,  than  that    of    ascertaining    whether    these 
reports  are  true  :  whether  there  is  a  possibility  of 
opening  a  route  across  the  continent  from  ocean  to 
ocean.     The  first  thing  to  be  done  is,  to  send  out 
an  expedition  of  competent  persons  to  survey  the 
country    along  the   course   of    the    Saskatchewan. 
River.  Such  an  expedition  would  commence  with  an 
examination  of  the  line  of  rivers  and  lakes  which 
unite  Lake  Superior  to  the  Lake  of  the  Woods — a 
magnificent   country,  which   we   know  affords  the 
most  abundant  facilities  for  settlement,  inferior  to 
none  in  the  best  parts  of  Canada.     It  could  be 
readily  ascertained  by  an  Engineer,  how  far  these 
waters  could  be  made  useful   for   the   transit   of 
merchandise.      The   expedition   would   then   cross 
the  Lake  of  the  Woods,  and  ascend  the  Saskatche- 
wan ;  report  upon  the  best  mode  of  surmounting 
the   falls   in   the   neighbourhood    of    Cumberland 
House  ;  and  proceed  to  survey  the  whole  course  of 
the  river  up  to  the  Rocky  Moimtains,  taking  notice 

u 


290  CONCLUSION. 

of  what  spots  are  most  favourable  for  the  formation 
of  villages  and  settlements  along  its  banks ;  ascer- 
taining how  far  its  waters  could  be  navigated  by 
steam-vessels,  and  whether  the  coal,  said  to  abound 
upon  its  banks,  could  be  made  available  for  the 
supply  of  steamers.  Passing  on  from  the  head 
waters  of  the  Saskatchewan,  the  expedition  should 
ascertain  the  best  route  to  the  shores  of  the  Pacific, 
through,  and  from,  the  Rocky  Mountains.  Upon 
all  these  points  there  is  much  need  of  accurate  in- 
formation. In  case,  then,  it  were  found  practicable 
to  open  this  line  of  communication,  the  next  thing 
would  be,  to  direct  the  stream  of  colonization  partly 
in  this  direction.  At  present,  it  would  be  requisite 
to  carry  food  the  greatest  part  of  the  journey,  or  to 
depend  upon  the  chase.  The  formation  of  settlements 
and  villages  would  obviate  this  necessity ;  food  would 
be  provided  in  abundance,  along  the  whole  course 
of  the  river.  If  this  were  accomplished,  Van- 
couver's Island,  and  the  country  in  its  immediate 
vicinity  on  the  main  land,  would  become  what  the 
terminus  of  a  railway  station  is  in  this  country. 
To  form  any  idea  of  its  importance,  and  of  the 
rapidity  of  its  growth  as  a  colony,  it  is  sufficient  to 
recollect  how  we  have  seen  towns  spring  up  in  this 
country,  where  not  a  cottage  stood  a  few  years  ago. 


CONCLUSION.  291 

For  the  same  reason,  Canada  will  feel  the  change. 
Canada  would  become  the  line  of  transit  for  emi- 
grants, and  for  all  the  commerce  which  colonies  in 
the  interior  would  necessarily  create,  instead  of 
being,  as  she  now  is,  planted  against  an  impene- 
trable wall  of  desert,  two  thousand  miles  thick. 

These  are  the  vast  speculations  into  which  the,  at 
first  insignificant,  question,  of  the  colonization  of 
Vancouver's  Island  has  expanded.  Call  them  the 
dreams  of  an  enthusiast — ^it  may  be  true :  it  may 
be  that  all  efforts  to  foresee  or  to  direct  the  desti- 
nies of  the  future  are  nothing  more :  certain  it  is,  they 
have  often  borne  the  name.  But  I  know  of  no  colony 
having  been  formed,  nor  of  any  great  or  lasting 
impulse  which  has  been  given  to  the  energies  of  a 
people,  in  the  accomplishment  of  which  ardent 
enthusiasm  has  not  had  the  largest  share. 

Looking  at  the  many  hundred  miles  over  which 
the  mighty  wave  of  population  has  rolled  towards 
the  west,  within  the  recollection  of  the  present  gene- 
ration, and  at  the  constantly  increasing  rapidity  with 
which  it  still  moves  onward,  it  is  scarcely  a  vain 
speculation,  to  anticipate  the  time  when  a  connected 
line  of  flourishing  settlements  shall  extend  along 
the  entire  line  of  communication  from  Canada  to 
Vancouver's  Island.      How  soon    might   not    this 


292  CONCLUSION. 

hop<^  be  realized,  if  we  could  enlist  the  services 
of  even  a  small  part  of  those  whom,  year  after 
year,  we  drive  out  of  this  coimtry  into  the  United 
States  ? 

There  is  no  part  of  our  Colonial  system  more 
lamentable  than  this — the  enormous  crowd  of  our 
fellow-countrymen  who  annually  desert  our  banners, 
and  number  themselves  amongst  the  citizens  of  a  rival 
power :  and  this,  when  not  only  are  there  millions 
of  acres  of  waste  lands  in  our  own  dominions  ready 
to  receive  and  to  enrich  them,  but  the  extension  and 
consolidation  of  our  empire  demands  their  presence 
on  our  side  of  the  frontier  line. 

Children  or  idiots  could,  have  devised  no  scheme 
of  colonial  administration  with  results  more  disas- 
trous to  our  interests  than  these.  And  if  it  be  true 
that  one  great  part  of  the  evil  may  be  traced  to  the 
nature  of  the  governments  which  exist  in  most  of 
our  colonies,  and  to  the  species  of  influence  to 
which  settlers  in  colonies  are  exposed,  then  it  is 
true  and  manifest  that  there  never  was  a  scheme 
devised  more  entirely  consistent  with  the  most  per- 
nicious part  of  our  colonial  policy,  than  that  which 
proposed  to  place  British  colonists  and  subjects 
under  the  dominion  of  a  Company  whose  rights 
and  privileges  have  been  maintained  in  defiance  of 


CONCLUSION.  293 

British  law,  and  whose  authority  will  be  established 
at  the  expense  of  British  liberty. 

The  Hudson's  Bay  Company  will  probably  have 
good  cause  to  regret  the  time  when  they  attracted 
public  attention  to  the  whole  of  their  lawless  trans- 
actions, by  asking  for  fresh  territory  :  nor  will  they 
feel  much  gratitude  to  the  Minister  whose  ill-judged 
benevolence  granted  their  request.  And  should 
some  active  Director,  relieved  from  the  cares  of 
managing  a  monopoly,  which  public  justice  had 
destroyed,  read  in  his  retirement  the  legend  of  the 
unfortunate  Tarpeia,  he  may  perchance  learn,  in 
the  mournful  recollection  of  vanished  profits,  to 
realize  the  moral  of  the  tale,  how  avarice  may  be 
crushed  by  the  gifts  which  it  covets. 


CATALOGUES,  INDEX  MAPS,  BOOKS,  AND  PAMPHLETS, 

PUBLISHED   BY 

TRELAWNEY  SAUNDERS, 

6,  CHARING  CROSS,  LONDON, 

AGENT,   BY    APPOINTMENT,    FOR   THE    SALE   OP   THE 

ORDNANCE    MAPS,    AND    ADMIRALTY    CHARTS. 

Just  Published,  16  pages,  Fcap.  8vo. 

SAUNDERS'S      CATALOGUE     of     RECENT 

WORKS  on  EMIGRATION  and  COLONIZA.TION:  con- 
taining Accounts  of  the  Colonies,  Guides  for  Emigrants,  Hand- 
books to  California,  Treatises  on  Colonization,  Parliamentary 
Documents,  Colonial  Maps,  &c. 

104  pages,  Fcap.  8vo.,  bound. 

SAUNDERS'S  GEOGRAPHICAL  CATA- 

LOGUE;  containing  Globes,  Planispheres,  and  Star  Maps; 
Atlases,  Maps,  and  Plans ;  the  Ordnance  Maps  of  the  British 
Isles, Geological  and  other  Physical  Maps;  Guide  Books,  &c. 
The  precise  title,  scale,  size,  number  of  sheets,  price,  &c.,  of  each 
Work,  is  methodically  described. 

In  Royal  8vo.,  sewed,  133  pages,  price  Is. 

ADMIRALTY    CHARTS.  —  Catalogue  of  Charts, 

Plans,  Views  and  Sailing  Directions,  &c.     Published  by  Order 
of  the  Lords  Commissioners  of  the  Admiralty. 
OaBNAXrCE    MAPS. 
Price  of  the  Set,  from  Sections   I   to  90,  8/.  17«.;    Large  Sheets, 
2s.  each ;   Small  Sheets,  6d.  each. 

SAUNDERS'S  INDEX  MAP  to  the  ONE-INCH 

ORDNANCE  SURVEY  of  ENGLAND  and  WALES  ;  show- 
ing the  Contents  and  reduced  Price  of  each  Sheet,  with  other 
details. — Sent  per  post. 

SMALL  INDEX  MAPS  to  the  SIX-INCH 
ORDNANCE  SURVEYS  of  LANCASHIRE  and  WIGTON- 
SHIRE ;  showing  the  Sections  published, and  the  Contents  and 
Price  of  each  Sheet. — Sent  per  post. 

Price  2s.  6d.  in  Sheets;  5s.  6d.  in  Case. 

LARGE  COUNTY  INDEX  MAPS  to  the  SIX- 

INCH  SURVEY  of  IRELAND,  showing  the  Sections  into 
which  the  Survey  of  each  County  is  divided  for  publication, 
and  the  Contents  and  Price  of  each  Sheet.  Each  Index  forms 
a  beautiful  County  Map.  Size,  40  inches-  by  27. 


Now  Ready  in  4  vols.  8vo,  Cloth  lettered,  price  £3. 
HISTORY    of    the    PHILOSOPHY    of   MIND; 

embracing  the  Opinions  of  all  Writers  on  Mental  Science,  from 
the  Earliest  Period  tothe  Present  Time.  By  Robert  Blakey, 
Esq.,  Author  of  "  History  of  Moral  Science  ;"  "  Essay  ou 
Moral  Good  and  Evil;"  "  Essay  on  Logic,"  &c. 
"  An  elaborate  guide  to  the  knowledge  of  all  authors  who  have 
written  on  metaphysical  science." — Literary  Gazette,  Nov.  25. 

"  The  whole  work  is  one  powerful,  learned,  and  vigorous  essay  of 
an  accomplished  mind  ou  mental  philosophy." — Britannia,  Nov.  18. 

Just  Published,  Fcap.  Svo.,  Cloth  lettered,|price  5«.,  Second  Edition, 
with  an  Alphabetical  List  of  upwards  of  1000  Works  on  Logic. 

AN  ESSAY  ON  LOGIC. 

By  Robert  Blakev,  Author  of  "History  of  Philosophy  of  Mind." 
"  A  book  full  of  judicioiis  and  useful  observations,  and  from  which 
the  intelligent  reader  will  reap  much  instruction,  and  food  for  reflec- 
tion."— Literary  Gazette. 

Just  Published,  Second  Edition,  8vo.,  price  8s.,  Cloth  lettered. 
FREE    WILL:    An   Essay,   shewing   the   connexion 
between  our  notions  of  MORAL  GOOD  and  EVIL,  and  our 
conceptions  of  the    freedom  of  the  DIVINE  and  HUMAN 
WILLS. 

In  Fcap.  8vo.,  Cloth,  3s.  Qd. 

THE  PRINCIPAL  DISEASES  of  INDIA 

BRIEFLY  DESCRIBED;  with  Hints  on  the  Duties  of 
Medical  Officers  in  that  Country.   By  C.  Alex.  Gordon,  M.D. 

Just  Out,  in  4to.,  price  7s.  &d. 

LINEAR  TABLES  for  facilitating  the  Calculation  of 

Areas  and  Earthwork,  designed  for  the  use  of  Practical  Engi- 
neers and  Surveyors.     By  Arthur  W.  Forde,  Civil  Engineer 
"The  liability  to  error  in  all  calculations  must  be  very  much 
reduced  by  making  the  process  altogether  mechanical,  while  it  will 
also  be  found  to  ensure  considerable  saving  of  time  in  the  operation." 

Just  Out,  price  Is.  6rf. 

GLOBES,    ATLASES,   MAPS,    CHARTS, 

PLANS,  GUIDE  BOOKS,  ILLUSTRATIONS,  and  other 
Geographical  and  Topographical  Works,  sold  Wholesale  and 
Retail.  

TREIiA'WV£'Sr    SAinrBBRS, 

AGENT    BY  APPOINTMENT  FOR 

THE  ORDNANCE  MAPS  AND  ADMIRALTY  CHARTS, 

6,  CHARING  CROSS,  LONDON. 


University  of  California 

SOUTHERN  REGIONAL  LIBRARY  FACILITY 

305  De  Neve  Drive  -  Parl(ing  Lot  17  •  Box  951388 

LOS  ANGELES,  CALIFORNIA  90095-1388 

Return  this  material  to  the  library  from  which  it  was  borrowed. 


RECEDED 
|\PR  0  6  200* 
UCLA  LAV\I 


UBhW^'' 


Form  L-9-20m-8,'37 


F 

1060.8 

M361iZf 


4-L 


mumiSSL'^'ONAL 


ig^VMClLITY 


^     000  887  T?! 


1