Skip to main content

Full text of "A field test for available phosphorus in soils"

See other formats


LIBRARY  OF  THE 
UNIVERSITY  OF  ILLINOIS 
AT  URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 


N.QN  CIRCULATING 

CHECK  FOR  UNBOUND 
CIRCULATING  COPY 


UNIVERSITY  OF  ILLINOIS 

Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


BULLETIN  No.  :«7 


A  FIELD  TEST  FOR  AVAILABLE 
PHOSPHORUS   IN   SOILS 


BY  R.  II.  BKAY 


URBANA,   ILLINOIS,  AI'(,r>T.  1929 


CONTENTS 

PAGE 

DEVELOPMENT  OF  THE  COLORIMETRIC  METHOD  OF  TESTING 
SOILS  FOR  PHOSPHORUS 591 

THE  ILLINOIS  ADAPTATION  OF  THE  COLORIMETRIC  TEST 593 

The   Reagents  Used 593 

Making  the  Test 593 

Applying  the  Test  in  the  Field 595 

RESULTS  OF  THE  TEST   ON  THE   ILLINOIS  SOIL  EXPERIMENT 
FIELDS 595 

Results  on  Dark-Colored  Soils 596 

Results  on  Light-Colored  Soils 598 

Effect  of  Soil  Treatments  on  Available  Phosphorus 600 

Available  Phosphorus  Found  at  Various  Depths 601 

SUMMARY   AND   CONCLUSIONS 601 

LITERATURE  CITED. .  .  602 


A  FIELD  TFS  I   FOR  AVAILABLE 
PHOSPHORUS  IN  SOILS 

1U"   R.  11.  HUAY,  First    Assistant    in  Soil  Survey  An:ily>is 

It  is  well  known  that  many  of  the  soils:  of  the  Middle  \Yest  are 
deficient  in  the  phosphorus  available  for  crop  growth.  After  soil  acidity 
has  been  corrected  and  a  proper  rotation  has  been  established,  phos- 
phorous frequently  remains  a  limiting  factor  in  crop  production.  Re- 
-ults  obtained  by  Bauer  et  a  I2  from  the  soil  experiment  fields  of  Illinois 
show  that  some  soils  respond  highly  to  phosphate  fertilization,  while 
others  give  a  very  low  response  or  none.  Reports  from  county  farm 
advisers  and  farmers  in  general  are  in  agreement  with  these  experi- 
mental results. 

A  simple  field  test  has  been  devised  at  the  Illinois  Station  which 
will  distinguish  soils  having  a  high  amount  of  available  phosphorus 
from  those  having  a  low  amount.  It  is  the  purpose  of  this  bulletin  to 
describe  this  test  and  to  show  its  agreement  with  soil  productivity,  and 
with  crop  response  to  phosphate  fertilizers. 

Since  this  test  uses  the  common  colorimetric  method  for  phos- 
phorus, a  review  of  the-  application  of  the  latter  to  soil  research  by 
other  investigators  is  given. 

DEVELOPMENT  OF  THE  COLORIMETRIC  METHOD  OF 
TESTING  SOILS  FOR  PHOSPHORUS 

In  1920  Bell  and  I)oisy!  in  America,  and  Deniges1  in  France,  pub- 
lished methods  for  the  colorimetric  determination  of  small  amounts 
of  phosphorus  present  as  phosphate,  by  means  of  the  blue  color  pro- 
duced when  a.  reducing  agent  is  added  to  an  acid  solution  of  ammoni- 
um molybdate  containing  inorganic  phosphates. 

In  1924  Atkins'  applied  the  Deniges  method  as  slightly  modified 
by  FlorentilV  to  soil  extracts.  His  application  consisted  in  shaking  10 
grams  of  100-mesh  soil  for  three  to  four  hours  in  50  cc.  of  conductivity 
water,  Five  cubic  centimeters  of  the  cent  rifuged  extract  were  made 
up  to  100  cc.  with  the  proper  amount  of  molybdate  reagent  and  the 
developed  color  was  then  compared  with  a  standard  phosphate  solu- 
tion. His  1:5  extract  showed  less  than  two  parts  per  million  of  phos- 
phorus with  most  soils,  unless  the  soil  had  been  enriched  artificially. 
The  Ohio  Station  is  using  a  modification  of  Atkin's  method  in  a  port- 
able field  laboratory.1'' 

Parker  and  Fudge"  have  studied   the  Deniges  method,  applying  it 


592  BUU.KTIN  Xo.  337 

to  the  determination  of  small  amounts  of  phosphorus  in  soil  extracts 
and  in  the  displaced  soil  solution. a 

Spunvay'-'  has  also  modified  this  method  and  obtained  an  indication 
of  the  available  phosphorus  in  the  field  by  extracting  a  small  sample 
of  soil  in  a  folded  wax  paper  with  very  dilute  nitric  acid.  To  two 
drops  of  the  extract  are  added  two  drops  of  a  nitric  acid-ammonium 
molybdatc  solution  and  the  color  developed  after  stirring  with  a  tin 
rod.  The  color  obtained  this  way  fades  rapidly.  When  the  Spunvay 
method  was  applied  at  the  Illinois  Station  to  soils  of  the  various  ex- 
periment fields,  it  was  found  that  in  general  a  blue  color  was  obtained 
only  on  soils  which  had  been  treated  with  phosphate  fertilizers.  In  the 
case  of  soils  testing  "high"  by  the  method  devised  at  this  Station,  it 
was  possible  to  get  a  blue  color  but  in  most  cases  only  after  consider- 
ably more  prolonged  contact  of  soil  with  the  extracting  solution  than 
is  recommended  by  Spunvay.  Xo  test  color  was  obtained  with  the 
Spunvay  test  with  any  soils  testing  either  "medium"  or  "doubtful"  by 
the  Illinois  test  regardless  of  the  responsiveness  of  such  soils  to  phos- 
phate fertilization.  That  is  to  say.  the  range  in  available  phosphorus 
concentration  within  which  differences  were  observable  appeared  to  be 
confined  to  soils  which  had  received  phosphate  applications  and  to 
soils  which,  tho  untreated,  were  extremely  high  in  available  phos- 
phorus. 

The  term  "high"  in  available  phosphorus  is  used  in  this  bulletin 
to  mean  high  amounts  with  respect  to  adequacy  in  grain  farming  as  in- 
dicated by  lack  of  response  of  these  crops  to  phosphate  fertilization.  It 
is  conceivable  that  a  high  amount  for  grain  farming  may  be  an  inade- 
quate amount  for  truck  crops.  The  results  of  a  qualitative  test  of  this 
type  depend  upon  several  factors,  the  most  important  here  being  the 
time  of  reaction  with  the  soil  and  the  acid  concentration.  An  increase 
in  the  time  of  reaction  or  in  acid  concentration  up  to  a  certain  point 
results  in  a  darker  color.  It  is  thus  possible  to  obtain  no  color,  a  light 
blue  color,  or  a  dark  blue  color  with  the  same  soil  sample  by  varying 
the  acid  concentration  of  the  extracting  solution.  Thus  it  is  seen  that 
a  qualitative  test  means  nothing  until  it  has  been  standardized  by  com- 
parison with  crop  yields  and  phosphate  responses.  This  Spunvay  has 
done  with  his  test  with  reference  to  truck  crop  soils,  and  he  has  ob- 
tained satisfactory  results.  It  is  obviously  incorrect  to  compare  a  test 
standardized  for  truck  crop  conditions  with  one  standardized  for  grain 
crops.  The  above  discussion,  centering  around  Spunvay 's  test,  has 
been  given  in  order  to  bring  out  the  need  of  a  different  test  which 
would  be  applicable  to  general  farming  conditions,  rather  than  to  show 
or  infer  any  superiority  of  one  test  over  the  other. 


Analvt.    Ed..  In.lus.  Knsin.    Chom.  1,  136.    1929. 


A  FIKI.I)  TKST  FOR  AVAII.AI.LI-:  Pnnsi'iioiu's  ix  SOILS  o'lo 

THE  ILLINOIS  ADAPTATION  OF  THE 
COLORIMETRIC  TEST 

The  following  test.  devised  at  this  Station,  differs  from  that  of 
Spurway  in  tat  range  of  available  phosphorus  detected,  ibi  method 
of  operation,  i  c  i  kind  of  acid  used,  idi  concentration  of  reagents  and 
(el  permanency  of  the  blue  color.  It  has  proved  to  be  a  reliable  index 
of  the  available  phosphorus  status  of  the  soil  and  shows  promise  of 
becoming  a  serviceable  test,  not  only  for  the  soil  chemist,  but  also  for 
the  county  farm  adviser  and  the  farmer. 

The  Reagents  Used 

The  solution  with  which  the  test,  is  made  is  prepared  as  follows: 
Dissolve  100  grams  of  highest  purity  ammonium  molybdate,  phos- 
phate free,  in  850  ce.  of  distilled  water.  Filter  the  solution  and  cool  it. 
Then  add  it  slowly  with  constant  stirring  to  a  cold  mixture  of  1.700  cc. 
of  concentrated  hydrochloric  acid  (30  percent)  and  700  cc.  of  water. 
This  is  the  stock  solution.  The  solution  as  used  for  the  test  is  made 
by  diluting  120  cc.  of  the  stock  solution  to  1.000  cc.  with  distilled 
water.  In  addition  to  the  solution  a  small  tin  rod  as  recommended  by 
Spurway  is  required  for  the  lest.  A  piece  of  solder  wire  is  quite  satis- 
factory altho  slower  than  pure  tin  in  developing  the  blue  color. 

The  acid  concentration  has  been  carefully  worked  out.  Slight  vari- 
ations are  permissable  but  a  large  increase  in  the  concentration  of  acid 
used  results  in  a  colorless  test,  even  when  phosphates  are  present  in 
large  amounts.  A  large  decrease  in  the  acid  concentration  will  result 
in  the  test  solution  itself  giving  a  blue  color  when  stirred  with  the  tin 
rod  even  tho  phosphates  may  be  absent.  However,  the  slight  dilution 
caused  by  the  water  in  wet  soils  has  no  effect  on  the  results.  The  solu- 
tion alone  when  freshly  prepared  should  give  no  color  when  stirred 
with  the  tin  rod.  After  standing  for  a  few  weeks  it  will  develop  a 
slight  blue  color  upon  being  stirred  with  the  tin  rod.  This  does  not  in- 
terfere with  its  use  since1  the  small  quantity  of  the  material  giving 
the  blue  color  is  absorbed  by  the  soil  in  making  the  test,  so  that  soils 
which  would  give  a  "low"  test  will  .-till  give  a  "low"  test  with  the  aged 
solution.  If  more  than  a  slight  blue  appears  in  the  solution  when  it  is 
stirred,  that  is  an  indication  that  the  solution  has  been  contaminated 
with  phosphorus  and  should  not  be  used.  Arsenic,  which  may  be  pres- 
ent in  the  -oils  of  orchards  >prayed  with  arsenic  sprays,  gives  a  blue 
test  color. 

Making  the  Test 

The  test  is  made  by  shaking  1  part  of  soil  with  about  3  parts  of 
the  solution  in  a  small  test  tube  or  vial.  Only  enough  shaking  to  mix 
the  soil  and  solution  is  required.  "When  settled,  after  about  live  minutes, 
the  soil  should  occupy  about  one-third  of  the  tube  and  the  solution 
two-thirds.  The  clear  solution  is  then  stirred  gently  with  a  tin  rod 
and  without  disturbing  the  settled  soil  until  maximum  intensity  of 


594  BULLETIN  No.  337  [August, 

color  develops.  This  requires  from  10  to  20  seconds,  depending  upon 
the  amount  of  phosphate  present.  The  tin  dissolves  in  the  acid  solution 
and  brings  about  the  reducing  action  necessary  for  the  production  of 
the  blue  color.  The  varying  amounts  of  phosphate  present  are  indi- 
cated by  a  series  of  increasing  color  intensities  and  shades.  These 
range  from  very  light  green  thru  light  greenish  blue  to  a  deep  blue. 
The  color  chart  presented  here  shows  only  four  color  variations.  The 
first  is  colorless;  the  second,  light  green;  the  third,  greenish  blue;  and 
the  fourth,  medium  blue. 

To  simplify  the  recording  of  the  color  readings,  any  test  which  is 
colorless  or  nearly  so  is  called  "low.''  A  test  color  which  approximates 
the  second  color  shown  is  recorded  as  '''doubtful."  One  varying  around 
the  third  color  is  called  "medium.''  while  one  giving  a  color  as  deep  as. 
or  deeper  than,  the  last  is  "high."  Since  the  amount  of  the  blue  com- 
pound is  directly  dependent  upon  the  amount  of  phosphorus  extracted 
from  the  soil  by  the  acid  solution,  these  colors  have  also  been  desig- 
nated to  mean  "low."'  "doubtful/'  ''medium,"  and  '"'high"  amounts  of 
available  phosphorus:1  The  color  gradually  fades  upon  standing,  altho 
contrasts  between  different  samples  may  often  be  observed  after  an 
hour.  Some  "high"  test-  have  retained  a  good  blue  color  even  after 
24  hours.  Clear  solutions  containing  phosphates  but  without  the  pres- 
ence of  soil  show  only  a  slight  decrease  in  color  after  standing  for 
three  days.  If  desired,  the  faded  color  may  be  redeveloped  by  stirring 
again  with  the  tin  rod.  altho  if  allowed  to  stand  over  night  the  re- 
developed color  is  usually  darker  than  the  original. 

The  determination  of  the  color  range  with  its  corresponding  signi- 
ficance in  regard  to  available  phosphorus  has  been  based  entirely  upon 
what  is  known  about  the  response  of  grain  and  legume  crops  to  phos- 
phate fertilization  in  the  field.  Xo  attempt  has  been  made  to  correlate 
the  results  of  this  test  with  the  response  to  phosphate  fertilization  of 
truck  or  other  special  crops,  and  for  the  present  its  use  should  there- 
fore be  restricted  to  general  farms  growing  the  usual  grain  and  hay 
crops. 

Effect  of  Carbonates.  Free  carbonates  in  small  amounts  influence 
this  test  by  producing  a  bluish  green  to  green  color  rather  than  blue 
thruout  the  entire  range  of  intensities.  This,  however,  does  not  inter- 
fere with  the  use  of  the  test,  since  the  depth  of  color,  whether  green  or 
blue,  is  the  indicator  of  the  relative  amounts  of  available  phosphorus. 
If,  however,  they  arc  present  in  large  amounts,  so  that  a  continuous 
effervescence  results  the  test  cannot  be  relied  upon.  The  resulting  de- 
crease in  the  acid  concentration  makes  the  solution  useless  and  for  the 
present  no  means  of  overcoming  this  difficulty  is  known. 


Doubtful 


COLOR    CHART    OF    TEST    FOR    AVAILABLE    PHOSPHORUS 

"Low"  indicates  a  deficiency  of  available  phosphorus  for  average 
crop  growth. 

"Doubtful"  indicates  that  phosphorus  is  present  in  somewhat  larger 
amount  but  it  is  uncertain  whether  the  supply  is  sufficient  for  average 
yields. 

"Medium"  and  "High"  represent  still  larger  amounts  of  available 
phosphorus — amounts  that  in  general  will  be  adequate  for  average 
to  high  yields. 


_//)-?.'']  A  FIKLD  'I'KST  i-'cm  AVAIL. \HI.K  PiHisi'iioKrs  ix  SOILS  r>9f> 

Effect  of  Moisture.  Tin'  test  ni:iy  be  used  on  wet  soils  taken  di- 
rectly from  the  field  or  on  dried  samples.  The  dried  samples  are  prefer- 
able -hire  they  settle  more  quickly  in  the  test  tube  and  give  a  clearer 
solution.  The  soil  may  be  ground  or  unground  and  the  amount  used 
may  vary  as  much  as  25  percent  in  proportion  to  the  volume  of  re- 
agents used  without'  producing  an  appreciable  difference  in  the  re- 
sult s. 

Applying  the  Test  in  the  Field 

A  number  of  individual  soil  samples  should  be  obtained  from  points 
we'd  di-iributed  over  the  field  and  te-ted  separately.  The  plan  of  sam- 
pling a  field  as  recommended  by  Linsley  and  Bauer7  for  the  acidity 
te-t  i-  very  -ati-factory.  Such  a  plan  of  systematic  testing  makes  pos- 
sible mapping  of  the  soil  of  a.  given  field  with  respect  to  the  relative 
abundance  of  available  phosphorus.  Obviously,  a  test  of  a  single  sam- 
ple or  of  a  composite  -ample  made  by  mixing  the  samples  obtained  at 
various  point-  fails  to  give  an  accurate  picture  of  the  available  phos- 
phorus status  of  the  field. 

The  surface  samples  .-hould  be  collected  at  a  depth  of  an  inch  or 
t  \\  o  in  order  to  avoid  surface  litter,  using  care  that  they  are  not  taken 
from  under  manure  or  decaying  organic  matter,  because  of  the  local 
accumulation  of  available  phosphorus  from  these  materials  by  leach- 
ing. 

In  addition  to  the  surface  soil,  samples  from  lower  depths  should 
also  be  tested.  This  is  particularly  desirable  in  case  the  surface  soil  is 
found  to  he  deficient  in  available  phosphorus,  since  there  is  the  possi- 
bility of  encountering  available  phosphorus  within  the  feeding  range 
of  the  crop  roots.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  most  of  the  soils  tested  thu-  far 
showing  negative  result-'  in  the  surface  have  been  found  to  give  a 
medium  TO  high  te-t  at  Mime  depth.  This  depth  has  varied  from  10  to 
more  than  40  inches. 


-ome  of  the  uncertainty  irom  phos- 
phate fertilization.  No  ie-t  can  he  expected  to  eliminate  all  such  un- 
certainty. because1  -ome  field-  which  are  deficient  in  available  phos- 
phoru-  may  not  re-pond  profitably  to  plmsphale  applications  due  to 
the  lack  of  potassium  oi1  to  -ome  other  limiting  factor.  This  ie-t  i-  only 
recommended  as  a  mean-  oi  determining  whether  a  -oil  i-  already  -uf- 
ficiently  high  in  available  phosphorus  that  phosphates  may  be  elim- 
inated for  (he  present,  a'  !ea-t.  imm  the  -oil  improvement  program. 

RESULTS  OF  THE  TEST  ON  THE  ILLINOIS  SOIL 
EXPERIMENT  FIELDS 


590  BI-LLETIX  Xii.  ,337 

used  on  more  than  500  samples  from  the  check  plots  of  31  experiment 
fields  located  in  different  parts  of  the  state  and  also  on  samples  from 
farms  and  demonstration  plots.  The  results  of  these  tests  have  been 
found  to  be  in  good  accord  not  only  with  response  to  phosphate  fertili- 
zation, but  also  with  the  productivity  of  the  untreated  soil. 

A  summary  of  these  results,  together  with  the  ranking  of  the  dif- 
ferent fields  as  to  the  productivity  of  the  untreated  soils  on  which  the 
tests  were  made,  and  also  with  the  most  profitable  system  of  soil  treat- 
ment on  the  respective  fields  is  shown  in  Table  1.  The  ranking  in 
productivity  is  determined  from  the  value  of  the  crops  harvested  from 
the  untreated  plots.  It  is  necessary  to  use  crop  values  rather  than 
yields  in  order  to  express  the  average  of  all  crops  by  a  single  figure. 
Average  December  1  crop  values  on  the  farm  for  the  last  four  years 
are  used.  The  determination  of  the  most  profitable  system  of  soil  treat- 
ment is  based  upon  the  results  of  13  to  30  years  of  cropping  on  these 
fields  under  the  various  treatments.  The  table  is  divided  into  two  parts 
representing,  respectively,  the  dark-colored  soils  of  the  northern  two- 
thirds  of  the  state  and  the  light-colored  soils  of  the  southern  third. 

Results  on  Dark-Colored  Soils 

Considering  the  dark-colored  soils,  the  average  annual  acre  crop 
values  on  untreated  land,  based  upon  the  rotation  period  ending  in 
1927,  are  as  follows:  those  giving  a  "high"  phosphorus  test,  833.88; 
those  testing  ''medium,"  828.24;  and  those  testing  "low,"  824.26.  This 
is  an  increase  of  39  percent  on  the  field-  testing  '•high"  above  those 
testing  "low." 

The  first  six  fields  (Table  1)  whose  check  plots  test  "high"  or 
"medium''  are  highest  in  order  of  productivity.  In  no  case  was  phos- 
phate included  in  the  most  profitable  system  of  soil  treatment.  While 
the  Lebanon  field  is  much  lower  in  productiveness  than  the  above  six 
fields,  the  most  profitable  treatment  does  not  include  phosphate.  The 
"medium"  test  shows  this  soil  to  be  fairly  well  supplied  with  available 
phosphorus. 

On  the  next  three  fields.  Sidell.  Carthage,  and  Carlinville.  about 
half  of  the  check  plots  show  a  "medium"  to  ''high"  test,  while  the  re- 
mainder are  "low."  These  fields  are  in  the  intermediate  group  so  far 
as  response  to  phosphate  fertilization  is  concerned.  They  are  also  lower 
in  natural  productiveness  than  some  of  the  fields.  This  is  due  in  part 
apparently  to  a  deficiency  in  available  potassium,  since  these  fields 
lead  those  on  dark-colored  soils  in  response  to  potassium  fertilization. 

Starting  with  the  Kewanee  field,  the  rest  of  the  fields  on  dark- 
colored  soils  give  a  "low"  test  and  with  the  exception  of  Mt.  Morris 
and  Dixon.  these  fields  all  include  phosphates  in  the  most  profitable 
system  of  soil  treatment. 


A  FIKI.I)  TKST  rou  AVAII.AHI.K  Pnosi'iioin  s  i\  Son. 


TAHI.K   1. — RKSCI.TS  OF   AVAII.AHI.K   PIIOSPIIOUUS   TKST.   HANK    ix    Piin 

AND    M()ST    PliOFITAlil.K    Soil.    TliKATMKXT    OX     Jl.I.IXOIS    Soil, 
KN T    l'"l KI.DS 


Kaiik  in     Annual  acre 

Most  profit 

Field 

Predominating  soil  type 

Phosphorus      produc-    ."up  values 

able  soil 

test              tiviiv     lor  untreated 

treatment 

land 

system1 

Dark-colored  soils 

McXabb 

Brown  Silt  Loam 

I,  Muscatine  silt  loam) 

High                     1 

$39  91 

None 

\ledo 

Brown  Silt  Loam  On  Clay 

vGrundy  silt  loam)                                             Medium               2 

34.05 

KL 

1  -iMoille 

Black  Clav  Loam,  poorly  drained  phase 

(.Loessial  clyde  clay  loam)                                 High 

3               32.90 

KL 

Brown  Silt  Loam 

Medium 

(  Muscatine  silt  loam) 

to  low       J 

Hartsburu  

Black  Clay  Loam 

i  Grundy  clay  loam) 

High                     4               31.lt 

K 

Minonk  

Black  Clay  Loam,  poorly  drained  phase 

(.Loessial  clyde  clay  loam) 

High                   5 

31.19 

K 

Spring  Valley  

Brownish  Yellow  Gray  Silt  Loam 

(Clinton  silt  loam) 

Medium               0 

31.11 

K 

1  ebanon 

Grayish  Brown  Silt  Loam  On  Tight  day 

(.Grundy  silt  loam,  grayish  phase)                    Medium             14 

21.58 

KL 

Side!! 

Brown  Silt  Loam 

iMuscatine  silt  loam)                                         Low 

10               25  00 

RLPK 

Black  Clay  Loam,  poorly  drained  phase 

(Loessial  clyde  clay  loam) 

High 

1  'arthage  

Black  Silly  Clay  Loam  On  Clay 

(Grundy  silty  clay  loam)                              \     Medium 

12                23.43 

KLl'K 

Grayish  Brown  Sill  Loam  On  Tight  Clay 

(Grundy  silt  loam,  grayish  phase) 

Low 

(  'arlinville 

Grayish  Brown  Silt  Loam  On  Tight  Clay 

!  Grundy  silt  loam,  grayish  phase) 

Series  100  and  20(1 

Medium 

Series  300  and  400 

Low                   13 

21.81 

RLPK 

Kewanee 

Brown  Silt  Loam 

I  Muscatine  silt  loam) 

Low                    7 

29.94 

RLP 

Mt.  Morris  

Light  Brown  Silt  Loam 

iTama  silt  loam) 

Low                    8 

20.00 

RL 

Urbana  

Brown  Silt  Loam 

1  Muscatine  silt  loam) 

Low                     9               20  59 

RLP 

Dixon 

Brown  Silt  Loam 

i  Muscatine  sill  loam) 

Low- 

11                 25.07 

RL 

Light  Brown  Silt  Loam 

(Tama  silt  loam) 

Low 

(  'layton  

Brown  Silt  Loam  On  Clav 

'Grundy  silt  loam)                                                Low                     15                21.12 

KLl'K 

Joliet 

Brown  Siit  Loam  On  Calcareous  Drift 

'Clarion  silt  loam;                                                 Low                     10                1!)  53 

RLP 

•K  =  residues,  L  --limestone,   1'  =  rock  phosphate,  and  K  =  potassium. 


59S 


BULLKTIX  Xo.  337 


TABLE  1.  —  Concluded 


[August, 


Fiel 


Rank  in    An!!'ja!  ,acre  Mof*  Pro.^- 

prcxluc-     crop  values  able  soil 

tivitv     *or  untreated  treatment 

land  system 


Light-colored  soils 

Oquawka  

.  .  .     Dune  Sand,  Terrace 
(Plainfield  sand)                                             .     High 

Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Tight  Clav                       Low 

1             ill.  87              RL 
2               11.21               RLPK 

Toledo  

.  .  .    Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Tieht  Clav                       Low 

3                 7.42               RLPK 

Unionville  

.  .  .     Yellow-Gray  Silt  Loam                               :     Low  to 
medium 

Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Orange  Mottled  Tight 

4                7.35               RLPK 

Enfield    

Clay                                                             Low 
.    .    Light  Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Tight  Clay             Low 

5                 G.45               RLPK 
6                5.08               RLPK 

Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Orange  Mottled  Tight 
Clay                                                             Low 

Yellow-Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Tight  Clav           Low 

Odin 

Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Orange  Mottled  Tight 
Clay                                                                 Low 

Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Tight  Clay 
Gray  Siit  Loam  On  Tight  Clav                        Low 

7                5.91               RLPK 
8                5.77               RLPK 

Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Tight  Clav                       Low 

Yellow-Gray  Siit  Loam  On  Tight  Clay            Low 
Grav  Silt  Loam  On  Tight  Clav                       Low 

9                5.05               RLPK 
10                4  57               RLPK 

Elizabethtowr. 
Sparta  

.  .  .     Yellow  Silt  Loam                                            Low 

Yellow-Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Medium  Plas- 
tic Clay                                                           Low 

.  .  .     Light  Gray  Silt  Loam  On  Tight  Clay              Medium 

11                 4  55               RLPK 
12                3.99               RL 

Results  on  Light-Colored  Soils 

Excluding  the  Oquawka  field,  which  is  dune  sand,  the  light-colored 
-oils  are  almost  uniformly  '''low"  in  available  phosphorus  and  they  re- 
spond to  phosphate  fertilization.  The  Sparta  field  shows  ••medium"  on 
most  of  its  check  plots  and  does  not  respond  to  phosphates.  The  Union- 
ville field  shows  a  slight  color  on  several  plots  and  the  Elizabethtown 
field  shows  a  "medium"  color  on  one  check  plot.  In  the  above  dis- 
cussion, increases  indicated  for  phosphate  applications  have  been  based 
on  rock  phosphate  used  in  a  grain  system  of  farming. 

Figure  1  shows  the  relation  between  the  percentage  increases  in 
crop  yields  due  to  phosphate  applications  on  the  various  experiment 
fields  and  the  results  obtained  by  the  test.  The  agreement  between 
tost  color  and  percentage  increase  in  yield  is  very  good,  altho  there  are 
no  sharp  breaks  between  the  "high."  "medium,"  and  "low"  testing 
fields.  These  figures  arc  based  on  the  rotation  endinc;  in  1927. 


A  FIKI.D  TKST  KOU  AVAIL. \HI.I-:  Pnosi'iioiirs  ix  Son.* 


PERCENTAGE  INCREASE   FOR  PHOSPHATE 


en 
CD 


ElizabetMown 

West  5alem 

Newton 

Raleigh 

Jol.et 

Enfield 

Ewng 

Urbana 

Union^ille 

Oblong 

Toledo 

Sidell 

Kewanee 

Clayton 

Carlinvilte 

Dixon 

Mt.  Morris 

Lebanon 

Hartsburg 

Carthage 

Aledo 

Minonk 

McNabb 

Sparta 

LaMoille 

Spring  Valley 

Oquawka 


]TEST  LOW  ON  CHECK  PLOTS. 


LOW  ON  SOME  CHECK  PLOT5; 
MEDIUM  TO  HIGH  ON  OTHERS. 

TEST  MEDIUM  TO  HIGH  ON  CHECK  PLOTS. 


GOO 


BULLETIN  Xo.  337 


On  some  experiment  fields  soil  variation  with  respect  to  the  test 
was  very  marked,  results  of  '"low,"  "medium,"  and  "high"  being  ob- 
tained on  the  different  check  plots  of  the  same  field.  In  a  number  of 
such  cases  the  average  yields  of  corn,  oats,  and  wheat  were  computed 
separately  for  these  plots  and  are  plotted  in  Fig.  2.  Here  again  satis- 
factory agreement  is  observed  between  the  productive  level  of  the  soil 


• i  PHOSPHORUS  TEST  MEDIUM_TOJIGH. 
D  PHOSPHORUS  TEST  LOW. 


TO 


OflTS    CORN  WHEflT 

CARTHAGE 


OftTS    CORN  WHEflT 

MINONK 


OUTS    CORN  WHEflT  BlFfllFfl 

URBANfl    " 


FIG.  2. — RELATION   BETWEEN    AVAILABLE  PHOSPHORUS  TEST  AND  THE  PRO- 
DUCTIVE LEVEL  OF  UNTREATED  SOILS  OF  THE  ILLINOIS  SOIL 

EXPERIMENT  FIELDS 

Each  pair  of  contiguous  bars  represents  the  crop  yield  of  a  high 
testing  and  a  low  testing  check  plot  in  the  same  series  of  a  given  experi- 
ment field.  With  the  exception  of  the  oats  crop  at  Urbana,  the  high 
testing  plot  outyielded  the  corresponding  low  testing  plot. 


and  its  reaction  to  the  test.  For  instance,  the  untreated  Check  Plot  110 
on  the  Minonk  field  tests  "low"  and  the  yields  of  oats,  corn,  and  wheat, 
respectively,  are  54.1,  48.5,  and  23.7  bushels.  Check  Plot  101.  of  the 
same  series,  likewise  untreated,  tests  "high"  and  has  produced  average 
yields  of  58.9,  54.7.  and  42.5  bushels  of  the  three  respective  crops. 


Effect  of  Soil  Treatments  on  Available  Phosphorus 

The  effect  of  soil  treatments  on  available  phosphorus  is  readily 
shown  by  this  field  test.  Plots  receiving  residues  only  on  the  Urbana 
field,  for  example, showed  a  "low"  but  the  test  color  was  slightly  darker 
than  that  for  the  check  plot.  The  manured  plots  on  the  above  field 
and  also  on  the  Joliet  field  showed  still  more  test  color  over  the  check. 
The  plots  in  the  northwest  rotation  of  the  Urbana  South  Farm,  which 
receives  45  tons  of  manure  every  three  years,  show  a  "high"  while  the 


A  FIKI.I)  TKST  KOI;  AVAII.AHI.K  1'iiospiiours  i\   Son. 


taken  immediately  beneath  fresh  manure  show  a  "hiiih"  test,  altho  at 
a  depth  of  two  to  three  indies  the  soil  may  test  "low." 

All  plots  receiving  phosphate  treatment  show  a  ti'ood  hhie  color. 
l"nevenne-s  in  distribution  of  added  phosphate  is  sometime-;  indicated 
by  lack  of  uniformity  in  the  depth  of  the  color  in  individual  tests.  The 
higher  rates  of  application  result  in  deeper  color.  Plot  110-W  of  the 
Davenport  Series  at  Urbana.  which  has  received  approximately  (10.000 
]uiunds  an  acre  of  rock  phosphate,  i^ives  a  deep  blue-black  color. 
Where  13.1200  pounds  an  acre  of  rock  phosphate  had  been  applied  10 
other  parts  of  this  field,  the  soil  <^ave  a  deep  blue,  gradually  decreasing 
in  intensity  to  a  depth  of  30  inches,  while  the  adjacent  tinphosplmted 
plot  showed  a  colorless  test  thruout  this  depth. 

Since  any  form  of  phosphate  fertilizer,  regardless  of  its  chemical 
nature  or  fineness  of  division,  will  pve  the  blue  color  when  added  to 
the  soil,  it  is  apparent  that  this  test  cannot  be  used  to  demonstrate 
the  value  of  any  particular  form  of  phosphate  fertilizer  as  compared 
to  another,  nor  to  discriminate  between  various  forms  of  phosphate 
fertilizer. 

Available  Phosphorus  Found  at  Various  Depths 

Some  interesting  observations  have  been  made  on  subsurface  and 
subsoil  availability.  Where  a  "medium"  or  ''hiidi''  test  is  found  in  the 
surface  soil,  the  color  intensity  increases  in  the  lower  levels  unless  tin- 
surface  color  has  been  caused  by  phosphate  fertilization. 

Where  a  "low''  test  is  found  on  the  surface,  this  ''low"  test  may 
persist  down  to  40  inches  or  more1  or,  attain,  there  may  be  a  gradual 
increase1  in  color  until  a  "hiu'h"  test  is  secured  at  some  intermediate 
depth.  Within  any  given  area  which  varies  with  respect  to  this  test,  the 
deeper  test  color  on  surface  soil  is  usually  to  be  found  in  lower  lyinu' 
land,  while  the  elevations  are  more  likely  to  uive  a  "medium"  or  "low" 
test  . 

The  existence  of  variation  within  a  uiiven  area  emphasizes  the 
desirability  of  mapping  the  areas  of  "hiidi."  "medium,"  and  ''low'' 
available  phosphorus  in  a  iiiven  farm  or  field  in  order  that  the  need- 
le-- application  of  phosphate  fertilizers  may  be  avoided. 


SUMMARY  AND  CONCLUSIONS 

1.  A   field   test    for  available  phosphorus  has  been   described    which 
is  recommended  for  the  use  of  farm  advisers  and   farmer-  because  oi 
its  simplicity  of  operation  and  practical  application. 

2.  When   applied  to  tin1  untreated   soils  of  the   Illiuoi-   Kxperiment 
1'ields   a   <iood   agreement    was    found   between   the   results   of   the   lest 
and  the  crop  increase-  resulting;  from  the  addition  of  rock  phosphate. 


602  BULLETIN  Xo.  337 

3.  Those    soils    which    tested    low    in    available    phosphorus    gave 
medium  to  high  crop  increases  when  phosphates  were  added.     In  all 
hut  two  of  these  fields  the  phosphate  treatment  was  profitable.    On 
these  two  fields  the  treatment  came  within  a  few  cents  of  paying  for 
itself. 

4.  The  soils  which  tested  medium  to  high  in  available  phosphorus 
gave  little  or  no  crop  increase  when  phosphate  was  added.    In  no  case 
was  the  treatment  profitable. 

5.  The  productiveness  of  untreated  soils  was  generally  higher  where 
the  test  showed  a  good  amount  of  available  phosphorus. 

6.  All  phosphated  soils  tested  high   in  available  phosphorus   and 
those  to  which  large  amounts  of  manure  had  been  added  also  gave 
a  blue  color. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

1.  Atkins.  W.  R.  G.   The  rapid  determination  of  available  phosphates  in  soils  by 

the   Coeruleo-Molybdate  reaction   of  Deniges.   Jour.  Agr.  Sci.   14.   part   2, 
192-197.  1924. 

2.  Bauer.  F.   C..   Smith.  R.  S..  and  Smith.   L.   H.     The   Illinois  soil   experiment 

fields.     111.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Bui.  273,  41-327.     1926. 

3.  Bell.  R.  D..  and  Doisy,  E.  A.     A  rapid  colorimetric  method  for  the  determina- 

tion of  phosphorus  in  urine  and  blood.    Jour.  Biol.  Chem.  44,  55-67.  1920. 

4.  Deniges.  G.  Reaction  de  coloration  extremement  sensible  des  phosphates  et  des 

arseniates.  Ses  applications.  Compt.  Rend.  Acad.  Sci.  (Paris),  171,  802-804, 
1920. 

5.  Florentin.  D.     Determination  de  phosphate  dans  1'eau.     Ann.  Chim.  Analyt.  3, 

295-296.  1921. 

6.  Jones.   Earl.    The   portable   soil   laboratory   and   the   Ohio   method   of   testing 

soils  for  acidity.  Jour.  Amer.  Soc.  Agron.  21,  381-384.  1929. 

7.  Linsiey.  Clyde  M..  and  Bauer.  F.  C.    Test  your  soil  for  acidity.  111.  Agr.  Exp. 

Sta.  Circ.  346.  1929. 

8.  Parker.  F.  W..  and  Fudge.  F.    Soil  phosphorus  studies:    1.   The  colorimetric  de- 

termination of  organic  and  inorganic  phosphorus  in  soil  extracts  and  the 
soil  solution.   Soil  Sci.  24,  109-117.  1927. 

9.  Spurway,  C.  H.    Test  soils  for  water  soluble  phosphorus.    Mich.  Quar.  Bui.  9, 

64-67.  1926. 


AUTHOU  INDEX 


AUTHOR  INDEX 


PAGE 

Ashby,  R.  C.  Practices  and  Prob- 
lems of  Cooperative  Live- 
stock Shipping  Associations 
in  Illinois 349-72 

Hauer.  F.  C.  Crop  Yields  From 
Illinois  Soil  lOxperiment 
Fields  in  1928 209-240 

Herg.  H.  A..  Case,  H.  C.  M.,  and 
Wileox.  R.  II.  Organizing  the 
Corn-Helt.  Farm  for  Profit- 
able Production 257-332 

Hray.  R.  H.  A  Field  Test  for 
Available  Phosphorus  in 
Soils 589-604 

Hull.  Sleeter,  and  Longwell,  J.  H. 
Relative  lOconomy  of  the 
Various  Cuts  of  Pork.  ..  .333-348 

Case,  II.  C.  M.,  Mumford,  II.  W., 
Stewart .  C.  L.,  and  Johnston, 
1'.  F.  Developmental  Study 
of  a  Rural-Urban  Trade 
Area 129*-208 

Case,  IF  C.  M.,  Wileox.  R.  IL, 
and  Herg,  IL  A.  Organizing 
(hi1  Corn-Belt  Farm  for  Prof- 
itable Production 257-332 

Johnston.  P.  10.,  Mumford.  II.  W., 
Stewart,  C.  L.,  and  Case,  II. 
C.  M.  Developmental  Study 
of  a  Rural-Urban  Trade 
Area 129*-20S 

Kingsley,  F.  C.,  and  Lehmann,  10. 
W.  Fleet  ric  Power  for  the 
Farm 373-380 

Knox.  John  II. ,  and  Snapp,  Ros- 
coe  R.  Summer  Rations  for 
Fattening  Steers 241-256 

Lehmann,  10.  W.,  and  Kingsley, 
F.  C.  Fleet  ric  Power  for  the 
Farm 373-380 

Lloyd,  J.  W.,  and  Newell,  II.  M. 
Observations  on  the  Refrig- 
eration of  Some  Illinois 
Fruits  in  Transit ;  .509-544 

Longwell.  J.  IL,  and  Hull,  Sleeter. 
Relative  Feonomy  of  the 
Various  Cuts  of  Pork ...  .333  348 


Mumford,  II.  W.,  Stewart.  C.  L., 
Case,  II.  C.  M.,  and  Johnston, 
P.  K.  Developmental  Study 
of  a  Rural-Urban  Trade 
Area 129+-208 

Newell.  II.  M.,  and  Lloyd.  J.  W. 
Observations  on  the  Refng- 
erat  ion  o  I  S  o  m  e  Illinois 
Fruits  in  'Transit 509  544 

Norton,  L.  J.,  and  Stewart,  C.  L. 
Seasonal  Features  of  Illinois 
C.rain  Marketing 1-4S 

Overmann.  O.  R.,  Sanmann,  F.  P., 
and  Wright,  K.  JO.  Studies 
of  the  Composition  of  Milk.. 
49-176* 

Ruehe,  II.  A.,  and  Tracy.  P.  II. 
Fn/yme  Activity  of  Ice- 
( 'ream  Improvers 481-  508 

Sanmann.  F.  I'.,  Overmann,  O.  R., 
and  Wright,  K.  10.  Studies 
of  t  he  Composition  of  Milk  .  . 
49-176 

Sayre,  C.  H.  Quality  in  Celery 

as  Related  to  St  met  lire  .  .557-  588 

Snapp,  Roscoe,  R.,  and  Knox, 
John  H.  Summer  Rations  for 
Fat  tening  Steers 21 1-256 

Stewart,  C.  L.,  Mumford,  II.  W., 
Case.  II.  C.  M..  and  Johnston, 
P.  10.  Developmental  Study 
of  a  Rural-Urban  Trade 
Area 129*-208 

Stewart,  C.  L..  and  Norton.  F.  J. 
Seasonal  Features  of  Illinois 
(Ira in  Marketing 1  48 

Tracy,  P.  IF,  and  Ruehe.  IF  A. 
JOn/yme  Activity  of  Ice- 
Cream  Improvers 481  508 

Wilcox,  R.  IF,  Case,  II.  C.  M., 
and  Herg.  II.  A.  Organi/ing 
the  Corn-Helt,  Farm  for  Prof- 
itable Production 257  332 

Woodworth,  C.  M.  Illini  Soy- 
beans  545  516 

Wright.  K.  F.,  Overmann.  O.  R.. 
and  Sanmann,  F.  P.  Studies 
of  the  Composition  of  Milk 

..  49-176 


INDEX 


INDEX 


Account intr.  sec  Farm  accounting 
Aledo  experiment  Hold  yields.  .213-14 
Alfalfa.   place   of   in  farm   organi- 
zation  269 

Antiocli  experiment  field  yields.  .   214 
Harley,    place   <>i   in   farm    organi- 
zation   266-67 

Bloomington      experiment      field 

yields 214 

Carlinville  experiment  field  yields  215 
Carthaee    experiment    field   yields 

. .'...215-16 

Cattle,  N(  c  Steers 

Celery,   structure   of  plant 561-66 

study   of    quality    in   as   related 

TO   structure 559-SS 

effect  on  quality  of  fertilizers  569 
of  method  of  blanching.  .569-70 
of  supplementary  irriira- 

tion .' .570-71 

laboratory    technic 571-72 

!it( rature   cited 5SS 

piwious  studies  of 559-61 

re.-uhs  oi    microscopic  exami- 

nat  ions 573-S5 

summary  and  conclusions.  .5S5-S7 

varioi  ies  tested 566-67 

comparison  of 567-69 

Clayton  experiment  field  yields..   216 
Clovers,   place  of  m  farm  organi- 
zation   269 

Corn,    marketinu:    studies    of,    see 
C I  rain   market  ing 

production  costs  of 262-66 

factors  affecting 330 

Corn  drier,  electric 433-36 

( 'urn.  elevator,  electric 431   33 

Costs    of    production,    factors    af- 
fect iiiLr 330 

of    grains    and    hays 262-70 

as  afft  cted  by  yield 262-64 

Cre;<m     separators,     use     of     elec- 
tricity   with 452-51 

Crop    diversification,    advantages 

of 2s5-s7.  293-96 

Crop  yields,  factors  affecting....  331 
on  experiment  fields,  192s.  .  .210-3S 
possibility  for  improvement  in 

'. 15S-60|: 

Hairy  products,  marketinu;  of..!79-S2 
study    of    production    and    con- 
sumption of 162-67* 

Davi  npurl   plot  yields,  192S 237 


Dixon  experiment  field  yields.  .216-17 
Egirs,    demand    for    improvement 

in   production   of 170-71 

production  and  consumption  of 

167-71* 

Electric   plants,   farm 472-73 

Electric  power  for  farms,  study  of 

'377-479 

construction     of     experimental 

line 3S5-S9 

data     from     farms     on     experi- 
mental line 378— So 

discussion    of   rates 466-71 

energy    consumption    on    each 

farm 3S9-100 

farm  production  use 429-66 

advantages  of  portable  motor 

for.. 429-30 

cream   separating 452-54 

drying  grains  and  SIMM!  ...  .433-36 

elevating    corn 431-33 

incubating  and  brooding.  .  .460-61 

milking 447-51 

oat  hulling 445-47 

painting,  spray 454-57 

poultry  house  lighting 457-60 

pumping 451 

seed  germination 461-66 

seed  treatment 466 

household  use 401-29 

buttermaking 427 

coffee  percolating 419-20 

cooking 415-19 

dishwashing 425-27 

effect  of  on  lime  saving 403 

food  mixing 419 

ironing 411-15 

lighting     and     minor     appli- 
ances   427-29 

pumping 403-407 

refrigeration 420-25 

washing 409-15 

water  heating 407-409 

preliminary    survey    of    equip- 
ment   used 2S3-S5 

summary 478-7!) 

HI  <    nl*n  Electric  plants,  farm 
Eleciric  transmission  lines  in  Illi- 
nois     376 

Electricity,     energy     consumption 

of  for  various  operations.  .474-78 
time    used    in    consumption    of 
1      kilowatt      by     various 
pieces  of  equipment 474 


I  NDKX 


F.le\  lit  ill's,   .s'(  i     (  iraitl   elevaf  ors 

Fli/abet  htown     experiment      field 

yields  .......................    '_MS 

Knlield  experiment    tirld  yields.  2IS-1!) 
F.quipment     costs.     regulation     of 

farm  .....................  2sl    S)> 

F.wintr.  experiment    field  yields..  210  '20 
Fxperiment  field  yields.  1928.  ..210-38 
Farm    accounting.    value    of  ...... 

...........  .  .......  2!)l-!>2.  )V27  ;]_> 

Farm  earnings  in  east   central  llli- 

noiH  .........................  32!) 

in  noi't  hwestern  Illinois  .....  1  I!)-")!!* 

Farm  labor.  M  i    Labor 

Farm  oriram/at  ion,  da!  a  from  MIC- 

ces>ful  ...........  I.");!-.")!,   M27  ii'2* 

principles  of  .uood  ...........  2C>2  !»() 

MI     ('onleiils  ................   2.")S 

I''arm  ]  lower,  distribution  of  t  hru- 

0111    year  .................  27S,  2S1 

xi  i    nixa  Labor  and  Tractois 
Farm    products,   marketing   of..  17!)  S."> 
slii  pint  'Ills  of  in  and  out   of  area 

und'T  >tud.v  ............  1  i:i    1.")* 

study    of    production    and    con- 

sum  pi  ion  of  ............  b)7  7!)* 

transportation  used  for  .....  17!),  ISO 

Farm    purchases   and   sales,   study 

of  ..........................  II,")" 

Fanning,     planning    a     profitable 

system   of  ................  2!)l-;>27 

.s-(  i    Contents  ..................   2.">S 

r'arminti-type  areas  of   Illinois  ...  117* 
r'arms.  number  of  per  square  mile 

in  count  n  's  ..................    l!7!) 

selection  and  purchase  of.  .  .  .)'>2f>-27 

l''armsteads.  plannintr  of  ............. 

...................  2S1   S.').  ;•',!!)  2.") 

I'Vuits,    market  imr    of  ..........  170-S2 

production      and      consumption 

of    .....................  171    71::: 

refriu'erat  ion  of  in  transit  ....511-11 

x<  c  (  'ontents  ................    510 

(Irain  ele\'ators,  comjiarat  i\'e  s(>a- 
sons    of    purcliase    and    ship- 
meiit   by  country  ...........  )!l-.'!7 

comparison  of  >ea^onal  acti\'iiy 
by   farmers'  and   by    private 
.....................  )!7.  )!!),    li'i 

si  oraire      ca  paciiy      of      I  Ilinois 

country  .......  »  .......  21  27.   ;!!) 

(Jrain    market  imr.   >t  udy    of  ......  )!!(') 

corn,   distribution    of  shipments 

«.f  ................  12-1)!.    I)!.    15 

>ectional    differences   in....      11 

seasoiia  1  change-  in  prices  of  1  1    17 
oafs,    earnings    on    hedged    and 

un  1  led  tred  ................  22  21 

distribution    of    sliipmetits    of 

................  17-1!).    11,    15 

sect  ional  differences  in  .  .  1!) 


. 

sea>i>nal     chalices    ill     prict  S    of 

.......................  1!)  22 

win  :i  I  .      disl  ribut  ion      <  u      .-In  j  >- 

meiils  of  ..................    !    5 

Mdioml    differences    in.... 

.................  ">  li.    12.    15 

seasonal   changes  in   prices  of  li    12 
*<  ,     <il.«>    Cram    elevators    and 

(Irani    storati'i 
drain   storage    on    farms  ........  27-)!l 

influence  of  on   time  of  sale... 

......................  :;•_'::  I.  ;;<i 

Crams.  production   costs  of  ......    2(>5 

profits  from  .................  2d(i  d7 

(  Irinders,   elect  i'ic  ..............  \',\7    !."> 

Hartsbur^-  experiment    In  Id  yields  221 
Ha\'s,   cost    of   producing  .........    2(>S 

place    of    in    farm    oriranixat  ion 

........................  2(i7  70 

I  letiry  couniy.  Mai  i>t  ics  from  .  1H2  207 
llo'j.-s  I'ollowiiifi  sieei'-.  u;iin~-  made 

by  ..........................    2.">2 

I  b  >me  equipment  ,  d'il  a   oil  ....... 

.....................  l.">:)-.)(i.  207: 

ncc  al--«>    I'llectric   po\\'er,   house- 

hold    u  >e    of 
Horse     labor,    crop    requirements 

for  ......................    '2!  I!)  ',\()\ 

variations  in  cost   of.  .27(>-7X.  27'J  SO 
me  <ilx<>   Labor 
Ice-cream    improvers,   en/vine  ac- 

ti\  ity  of  .................  I,s2  .Vis 

si'i-.   ('onttnis  ..................    1S2 

.loliet    experiment    field  yields....   222 

Ke\vanee  experiment    field  yields.  .  22)! 

LaMoille  experiment    field  yields.   22)1 

Labor,  adapt  imr  crop  plan   to  )!())!  .'!(),") 

calendar  for.  .  .Fi^.   Is.  l)i  I  ween  )!()S 

and  )',()!» 

distribution     of     in     caring     lor 

livi  Mock    ..............  :!().">  )H)S 

efficient    use  of  farm  ........... 

...........  275  7(1.   2!)<i  )!())!.   )!OS 

re(|uirenn  m-    of    various    crops 

and   farm  opera  I  ions.  ..  .2!)7  )!05 

*'  <    almi   IIor,-e   hbor 
t-ebanon    experiment    lit  Id    yields 


I.iveMork.     adjustments     in     pro- 

i  h  ict  ion  of  ................  )!l  7   1M 

amounts    and     kind-    of     feeds 

used    b\    ................  )!()!»    10 

bahnemir  oi    \\ith   crop  produc- 

lion    ....................  )IOs    D! 

cooperative    shipping    of,    \<  :i<\- 

imr  count  n->   m  ............    •'!•)! 

et'fecl  of  on  farm  earmims.  .  .270  7)i 
hbor  required  in  carinir  for.)!(H'p  )!()7 
oppori  unit  ii  s  for  impro\'em 

in      roduction   of  ........  I  do  d2* 


COS 


PAGE 

Livestock     cooperative     shipping 
assoe'iat ions,  accomplishments 

ol 352-53 

compel  it  ion   of  truck  operators 

with 183 

conclusions  from  study  of 371 

location  of  in  Illinois 352 

managers'   commissions   of 357 

operation   and   management   of 

358-67 

problems  of 367-71 

rates  charged  by 184,  354-57 

summary  of  study  of 371-72 

volume  of  business  done  by... 

182-84,  354-58 

McXabb  experiment  field  yields.. 224 

Markets,  roadside 184-85 

Milk,  studies  of  composition  of.. 

51-174 

sec   Contents 50 

Milking  machines,  electric 447-51 

Minonk  experiment  iield  yields.  .   225 
Morrow    plots,    decline    in    corn 

yield    on 288-89 

yields  for,  1928 238 

Mt.     Morris    experiment     field 

yields 226 

Newton  experiment  field  yields.. 

.' 226-28 

Oats,    marketing    study    of,    see 

drain  marketing 

place  of  in  farm  organization..  266 
Oblong  experiment  field  yields...  229 
Odin  experiment  field  yields.  .228,  229 
Oquawka  experiment  field  yields.  230 
Palestine  experiment  field  .yields 

....230-31 

Phosphorus,     available',     develop- 
ment of  colonmetric  test   for 

591-92 

effect  of  soil  treatments  on. 600  601 
Illinois  adaptation  of  colorimet- 

ric  test   for 593-602 

effect      of      carbonates      a  n  d 

moisture    on 594-95 

field  application  of 595 

method   of   making 593-95 

reagents    used 593 

results  on  experiment  fields.. 

595-001 

summary  and  conclusions  001   002 

variation  in  depth  of 001 

Pork,      method      of     calculating 

economy    of   cuts 340—17 

percentages    which    cuts    consti- 
tute of  carcass  of 337 

physical  composition  of  cuts  of 

. 330-10 

prices  ol    affected   by   consumer 

preference    335 

relative-    costs   of   edible   and    e)f 


PACK 

lean  meats  of 340—17 

wholesale'  cuts  eif 331 

Potatoes,     production     and     e-on- 

sumpt  ion  of 174-77* 

Poultry  prexluets,  marketing  of.. 

179-82 

ne-eel  feir  impreive-ment  in.... 109-71 
production     and      cemsumption 

eif   167-69* 

Production    costs,    see    Costs    of 

production 

Raleigh  e-xpe-riment    field  yields..   232 
Refrigeration  of  fruits,  see-  Fruits 
Rock     Island     e'emnty,     statistics 

from 192-207 

Scott,     county,      Iowa,     statistics 

from....'.. 192-93,   201 

Seed  gcrminators,  electric 461-65 

Seed-treating  machines,  electric..   466 
Sidell  experiment  fielel  yielels. . .  .   233 

Silage   emitters,  e-Iectrie- 436-37 

Soil    experiment    lie-Ids,  yields    on, 

1928 .' 210  38 

Soybeans,    place    of    in    farm    or- 
ganization      207 

Illini,  adaptability  of 555-50 

characteristics  of 547-52 

oil  cemtent  eif 554 

origin  of 547 

summary  of  stuely  of 546 

yielels  of 552-54 

Sparta  experiment,  fielel  yielels.  .233-31 
Spring     Valley     experiment     fielel 

yields   ..." 23 1 

Ste-ers,    summer    rations    for    fat- 
tening    243-55 

amounts  of  feed  consumed. .  .245— 47 
feeel     replacement     value     of 

pasture;   250-52 

feeels  consumed   per  100-pound 

gain  249-50 

financial   outceime 252-54 

gains  maele 247—19 

plan  of  e-xperiment 243—15 

summary 251,   255 

Toledo  experiment  field  yie-lds...  235 

Trae-tor  costs,'  variatiems  in 278 

Tractor    peiwer    use-el    feir    various 

e'reips 296-97.   299-301,   301 

Trade-      ami,      stuelv      of      rural- 
urban ' 130-208* 

see   Conte-nts 130 

Truck      transportation      e)f      live- 
stock   182-84 

Fnionville  e-xpe-riment  field  yielels 

'.  ..  236-37 

Urbana,  experiment  fie-ld  yields  237-38 

Vegetables,  marketing  of 179-82 

production  and  e'onsumption  eif 

..  177  79 


•Bulletin   320. 


IM.KK 


PACK 

Wheat.    markrtinii    Miuly    (if.    Kit 
(  I  r,-i  in   market  mil 
lace1  of  in  farm   t>rir;tni/:tt  i«m  .  .    -(id 


-  '9.30 
OF  ULlHois 


•••—  —  —  — 

UNIVERSITY  OF  ILLINOIS-URBANA 


Q  630.7IL6B  C002 

BULLETIN.  URBANA 
324-3371929