(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "First Church of Christ in Pittsfield, Mass. : proceedings in commemoration of its one hundred and fiftieth anniversary, Feb. 7th and 8th, 1914"

Go M. C 

974.402 

P67p 

1231499 



NEALCG-. _^^ 



ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 




3 1833 




100 2018 




^wS^^ 



^' > 



'>^ 



■ZJh^ ^Ite^Uvn^ ^Jiatoi^ea of 1707, /793 <u^ /853 



FIRST CHURCH 
OF CHRIST 

in PITTSFIELD 
MASSACHUSETTS 



PROCEEDINGS IN 
COMMEMORATION 

OF ITS 

ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTIETH 

ANNIVERSARY 

FEBRUARY 7th AND 8th 

19 14 



Sun Printing Company 
Pittsfield 









■J 

o 
O 



1231199 



THE COMMITTEE in charge of the 
PUBLICATION OF THIS BOOK WISH TO 
EXPRESS THEIR THANKS TO ThOMAS AlLEN, 

Esq., of Boston, for his kind permission 
to reproduce the miniature portrait in 
WAX OF THE Reverend Thomas Allen, 

WHICH IS HERE PRINTED FOR 
THE FIRST TIME. 



INTRODUCTION 



At the Annual Meeting of the First Church on 
January 8th, 1913, the Pastor spoke of the fact that 
tJie One Hundred and Fiftieth Anniversary of the or- 
ganization of the Church was only a little more than 
a year away, and that a committee might well be 
appointed to have general charge of preparations 
for the observance of this occasion. Accordingly, it 
was voted that he be authorized to name such a 
committee. Three members of the general com- 
mittee which served at the time of the One Hundred 
and Twenty-fifth Anniversary, Mrs. Franklin K. Pad- 
dock, Miss Elizabeth D. Davis and Mr. Henry A. 
Brewster, were appointed as members of the new 
committee, and also the following children of the 
other three members of the former committee: Miss 
Elizabeth W. Hinsdale, Mr. William L. Adam and 
Mr. Thomas F. Plunkett. 

On February 5th this general committee for the 
One Hundred and Fiftieth Anniversary held its first 
meeting and elected the Pastor as chairman and Mr. 
Plunkett as secretary. Subsequent meetings were 
held on March 27th, May 7th and December 3rd. 
The details of preparation for the Anniversary were 
turned over to the special committees on finance, in- 
vitations, entertainment of guests, supper, pageant, 
decorations, music, portraits, ushering, and program, 
the names of whose members are given at the end 
of this book. These various committees performed 
their duties with remarkable energy and diligence. 



Attractive invitations were engraved bearing the 
pictures of the three meeting houses which the 
Church has had; and about twelve hundred of these 
invitations were sent out to descendants of the early 
settlers, of officers of the Church and Parish, and of 
members of the Church during the past one hundred 
and fifty years, living outside of Pittsfield. A surprising 
number of such persons were found ; and their answers 
gave evidence of much joy in being thus remembered 
and made mention of many sacred recollections. It was 
evident that this Church has always had a wonderful 
hold upon those mothered under its roof. Invitations 
were also sent to all absent members of the Church 
and Parish, to members recently dismissed, and to 
all clergymen and others who have had close con- 
nection with this Church. In addition to these, in- 
vitations were sent to the five colleges to which min- 
isters of this Church have gone to become their 
presidents, namely, Bowdoin, Amherst, the University 
of Texas, Lafayette, and the University of Michigan; 
also to Williams College, and to professors in the An- 
dover, Yale, Hartford and Union Theological Semina- 
ries ; also to the presidents of the seven Congregational 
benevolent societies, to the Massachusetts Congrega- 
tional churches west of Worcester, to the Congrega- 
tional churches and ministers of Berkshire County, the 
ministers of all the churches in Pittsfield, and to many 
others. As it was impossible to send separate invita- 
tions to the descendants of the families of this Church 
living in Pittsfield, special invitations were prepared 
for each church in the city, which were read from 
their pulpits, and were also printed in the daily papers. 
Thus it was hoped that all would be reached who 
were in any way connected with the Church or inter- 
ested in it. The response to these invitations exceeded 



all expectations. Somewhat more than a hundred per- 
sons came from outside of the County to attend the 
exercises of the Anniversary. A considerable number 
were accredited representatives of churches in West- 
ern Massachusetts. 

The weather, both on the Saturday and on the 
Sunday, was favorable, being cold enough to seem 
seasonable and yet not severe. The program began 
on Saturday afternoon, February seventh, the exact 
date of the Anniversary, with a public meeting in the 
Church at three o'clock. The Church was beautifully 
decorated with evergreens and yellow genista, and be- 
hind the pulpit, a single large white lily. Along the gal- 
lery rails were hung the wooden shields bearing the 
names of the eight foundation men which were used at 
the One Hundred and Twenty-fifth Anniversary, and 
beside the pulpit stood a tablet on which were inscribed 
the names of the past ministers of the Church. The Pas- 
tor presided. The meeting was opened by the singing of 
the hymn "Let children hear the mighty deeds. Which 
God performed of old," (St. Martin's). This was follow- 
ed by the reading of the One Hundred and Fifteenth 
Psalm by Rev. Addison Ballard, D.D. ; and prayer 
was offered by Rev. Charles J. Palmer of Lanesbor- 
ough. The three historical papers and the Poem, which 
appear elsewhere in this book, were then read, name- 
ly: a General Sketch of the History of this Church, by 
Dr. Henry Colt ; The Origin, History and Significance 
of the New Year's Sunrise Prayer Meeting, by Miss 
Julia W. Redfield; An Appreciation of the Ministry 
of William Vail Wilson Davis, by Judge Charles L. 
Hibbard; and the Poem, by Mrs. Augustus McK. 
Gififord, read by her brother, Mr. Harold Stearns 
Davis. The exercises were closed with the singing 
of the hymn, "O God, beneath Thy guiding hand," 



8 

(Duke Street), and the benediction by Rev. Payson 
E, Pierce of the South Church. 

At six o'clock supper was served in the Church 
Parlor for the specially invited guests from out of 
town, the ministers of the Pittsfield churches and their 
wives, the Deacons of this Church and their wives, 
and the members of the General Committee on the 
Anniversary. More than a hundred persons enjoyed 
the delicious meal which had been prepared. At seven 
o'clock, it had been intended to have the informal 
speeches made at the tables; but on account of the 
large number who were anxious to hear them, it was 
decided to have them given in the Church. The 
speakers were President Harry A. Garfield, LL. D., of 
Williams College, Rev. Henry G. Smith of Northamp- 
ton, Henry M. Humphrey, Esq. of New York, and 
General Morris Schaff of Boston. Following this 
meeting there was given at half-past eight o'clock in 
the Sunday School Room a Pageant of the history 
of the Church, arranged and directed by Miss Mar- 
garet MacLaren Eager. On account of the wide in- 
terest aroused by this event of the program, it was 
found necessary to limit the attendance to members 
of the congregation of the First Church and their 
specially invited guests. This restriction, unfortunate- 
ly, kept away many persons who would have been 
glad to come ; but on the other hand had the happy- 
result of making the atmosphere of the production 
much like that of family theatricals; and the informal- 
ity and simplicity of the Pageant, in these circum- 
stances, added to its effectiveness. The audience was 
exceedingly sympathetic and appreciative. 

On Sunday, the eighth, the first of the three ser- 
vices began at half-past ten o'clock. The order was 
as follows : 



Sentences of Holy Scripture 

Hymn — "All people that on earth do dwell" (Old Hundredth) 

Invocation and Lord's Prayer 

Responsive Reading — Psalm 145 

Gloria Patri 

Offering 

Scripture Lesson — Ephesians 3:14-4:16 

Duet and Chorus — "I waited for the Lord" (from the 

Lobgesang), Mendelssohn 

Prayer — by Rev. Raymond Calkins, D. D., Minister of the 

First Church in Cambridge 

Hymn — -"O God of Bethel, by whose hand" (Dundee) 

Sermon — by Dr. Calkins. 

Prayer 

Hymn — "Our God, our hope in ages past" (St. Anne) 

Benediction 

At twelve o'clock special exercises were held in the 
Sunday School. The Superintendent, Mr. William 
A. Whittlesey, presided, and the singing was led by 
Mr. Frederick T. West of Chicago, a former super- 
intendent. An informal talk on the history of the 
School was given by Mr. William L. Adam, the As- 
sistant Superintendent. Through an unfortunate in- 
advertence no stenographic report of Mr. Adam's 
remarks was taken, so that his address can be re- 
produced in outline only. He began by referring to 
a recent fire on North Street opposite the site of the 
fire of 1868 in which the records of the Parish were 
destroyed. Partly on account of this loss, it is im- 
possible to tell precisely when the Sunday School was 
started, but it must have been about the year 1816; 
so that, Mr. Adam went on to say, " If we should 
have a birthday cake for the Sunday School on this 
platform, to-day, there would be ninety-eight candles 



10 



on it !" The life of the school in later days was vividly 
sketched ; and the whole of the address was greatly en- 
joyed by the large number present, whether more by 
the children than by the elders it would be hard to say. 

In the afternoon, in accordance with the ancient 
custom, a communion service was held at three o'clock, 
the sermon being preached by Rev. Charles G. Burd of 
Columbia University, Assistant Minister from 1908 
to 1910. The deacons officiating were Messrs. James 
Jacobs of the Second Church, George Shipton of the 
South Church, W. Erving McArthur of the Pilgrim 
Memorial Church, Alphonse C. Bouteiller of the 
French Evangelical Church and Alexander Kennedy 
and William D.Goodwin representing the First Church. 
The order of the service follows: 

Hymn — " For all the saints, who from their labors rest " 
(Sarum) 

Prayer 

Responsive Reading — Psalm 84 

Scripture Lesson 

Anthem— "Rock of Ages" Dudley Buck 

Sermon — by Rev. Charles G. Burd of Columbia University 

Words of Invitation 

Hymn — "Jesus, Thou joy of loving hearts" (Hesperus) 

The Communion 

Hymn — "Bread of the world, in mercy broken" (Eucharistic 

Hymn) 
Benediction 

On Sunday evening the closing service consisted 
largely of music. The South Gallery was filled by a 
chorus of seventy-seven voices, and the Church was 
crowded to overflowing. The order was as follows : 



II 

Organ Prelude — Allegretto, from the Lobgesang 

Mendelssohn 

Chorus — " Lord, I have loved the habitation of Thy house " 

Torrance 

Invocation and Lord's Prayer — by Rev. Thomas Nelson 

Baker of the Second Church 
Hymn — "Angel voices, ever singing" (Angel Voices) 

Organ Interlude — Andante, from the Fifth Symphony 

Beethoven 

Soprano Solo — "With verdure clad" (from The Creation) 

Mrs. W. W. Mears Haydn 

Responsive Reading — Psalm 95:1-7; — led by Mr. Paolo L. 
Abbate, missionary in charge of the Italian Congrega- 
tion 

Gloria Patri 

Organ Interlude — March and Chant Seraphique (In Me- 
moriam) Guilmant 

Scripture Lesson — Ephesians 1:15-23; by Rev. Ren6 Elsesser 
of the French Evangelical Church 

Chorus — " Te Deum " in B minor Dudley Buck 

Prayer — by Rev. Warren S. Archibald of the Pilgrim Me- 
morial Church 

Bass Solo — "O holy Father, Who vi^atchest over us" Widor 

Mr. Anthony Reese, 

accompanied by Mr. Carl Escher on the violin 

Address — by the Pastor 

Chorus — " God hath appointed a day " Berthold Tours 

Organ Interlude — "Angelus " Arcadelt 

Hymn— "I love Thy kingdom, Lord" (State Street) 

Prayer 

Organ Postlude — "Hallelujah Chorus" Handel 

(for which the Congregation rose) 
Benediction 



The Memorial Portrait Gallery in the prayer room 
of the Parish House was open throughout Satur- 
day and Sunday; and was viewed with interest and 
delight by all. It included some three hundred por- 
traits of former ministers and members of the Parish. 
A complete list will be found in the Appendix. 



GENERAL SKETCH 

OF THE 

HISTORY OF THE CHURCH 



By Dr. Henry Colt 



Twenty-five years ago it was the great privilege 
of many of us to listen to an historical address on 
the founding of this church by the Rev. Jonathan L. 
Jenkins. That address, so accurate in its historical 
details, so vividly portraying the tremendous sense of 
obligation to which the founders of the church felt 
themselves bound, the felicitous style of the writer, the 
intense feeling in the delivery, the delineation of the 
character of the men who were responsible for the 
establishment of the church in the wilderness, the 
wonderful tribute paid to the different pastors under 
whose guidance the church grew and thrived, remains 
preeminently the most noteworthy of the several 
papers which were read on the occasion of the anni- 
versary of the founding of this church. 

It would be most presumptous in me to even at- 
tempt to bring before you any new or original ma- 
terial concerning the early history of the town and 
church, as the subject v\^as so thoroughly and carefully 
presented twenty-five years ago. I can do no better 
than to briefly and liberally quote from what Dr. Jen- 
kins and others brilliantly and accurately gleaned from 
Pittsfield's history in its relation to this church and 
parish, and take no shame in so doing. 



14 

Three years ago we celebrated the one hundred 
and fiftieth anniversary of the founding of Pittsfield, 
and to-day we celebrate the founding of its first 
church. You will remember possibly that in 1741 this 
township was originally owned by three men, — John 
Stoddard, of Northampton, Jacob Wendell, of Boston, 
and Philip Livingston, of Albany. They were to see 
to it that this land was to be settled upon by families 
in accordance with the provisions of the grant of the 
land from the General Court to the Town of Boston 
from whom the three gentlemen above-named secured 
their title. 

Settlers came in slowly; some departed not liking 
the country or thinking it too exposed to Indian depre- 
dations, and it was not until 1761 that the town was 
duly incorporated. 

The compulsory support of religious worship was 
imposed by Massachusetts upon those who settled the 
townships. In Smith's history of the town he says: 
" Whatever evils attended the compulsory support of 
religious worship, perpetuated under circumstances to 
which it was not applicable, it worked little but good 
to those upon whom its requirements rested, while it 
was essential to the future of Massachusetts that her 
Puritanism should be preserved incontaminate. Not 
to dwell upon its direct and palpable influence in pre- 
venting that deterioration of morals and manners in- 
cident to all frontier life, the attention to religious in- 
stitutions, which Massachusetts plantations were for- 
bidden to postpone, was of unbounded benefit in 
securing rapidity and amity of municipal organiza- 
tions, in elevating the tone of local sentiment and by 
investing the new abode, however rude its cabins, with 
the sanctity of home." In accordance, therefore, with 
the instructions laid down for them, in 1761, the early 



15 

settlers petitioned that a suitable building should be 
erected for church purposes. Several disagreements 
arising, however, between the settling proprietors and 
the actual settlers as to the size of the meeting-house, 
the cost, the number of pews, the building itself was 
not completed until 1770. It stood immediately in 
front of this present church ; "a. plain, angular build- 
ing, forty-five feet long, thirty-five wide and twenty 
feet post; two stories high, with roof peaked after 
the ordinary, modern style; covered with rough, un- 
painted clapboards, with square windows, and, in the 
middle of the south, east and west sides, doors of the 
same Quakerish pattern ; without belfry, portico, pilas- 
ter or bracket ; the ugly little barn-like structure about 
to be consecrated by words and acts for freedom as 
bold, as pure, and as ardent as any that were ever 
spoken or done in American history." With the dif- 
ficulties arising in the building of the first meeting- 
house, there were difficulties also in calling and settling 
a minister, theological rather than pecuniary. 

There were several probationers, but it was surely 
a fortunate circumstance that Mr. Thomas Allen of 
Northampton was invited to preach as a probationer, 
December the 9th, 1763. The formation of the church 
as such was duly inaugurated by a meeting of " a 
number of members belonging to different churches at 
the house of Deacon Crofoot." This was on the seventh 
of February, 1764. At the meeting at Deacon Cro- 
foot's house there were present besides those ready 
to undertake the church formation. Rev. Samuel Hop- 
kins of Stockbridge and Rev. Ebenezer Martin of 
Becket. A Confession of Faith and a Covenant 
were drawn up, and signed by eight male members, 
" who then and there united so as to form a church 
of Christ in this place." 



i6 

The eight names signed to the Covenant and Ar- 
ticles of Faith are: Stephen Crofoot, Ephraim Stiles, 
Daniel Hubbard, Aaron Baker, Jacob Ensign, William 
Phelps, Lemuel Phelps, Elnathan Phelps. At the cele- 
bration of the One Hundred and Twenty-fifth Anniver- 
sary, Mr. Robert W. Adam read a most interesting 
paper upon the lives of these men, called the Founda- 
tion Men; it would be beyond the province of this 
sketch to dwell upon their lives here or elsewhere, as 
Mr. Adam has so thoroughly and delightfully por- 
trayed their connection with the town and church. 
Dr. Jenkins says these men were found "to serve as 
Foundation Men, a happy use of Lord Bacon's term. 
We recall and honor these men to-day. We write 
their names on shields and hang them in the House 
of the Lord." Of the Creed and Covenant Dr. Jen- 
kins again says, "of the original Covenant no man 
need be ashamed. Let me read its close. 'We do now 
publicly espouse and engage in the cause of Christ 
in this town, — promising to be faithful in the same, 
and to endeavor to promote it in all proper ways, es- 
pecially seeking to recommend our holy religion to 
all by our strict and constant practice of justice, good- 
ness, temperance, sobriety and godliness.' " It was 
something in the beginning of a town's career to have 
even eight men, confederated together for such an 
end. Of the ministers who were present he says, " No 
bishops living then or since, or before or now, could 
impart more apostolic grace to an infant church." 

Soon after this meeting this record is found: — 

Pittsfield, Mch. 6, 1764- 
The Church of Christ in Pittsfield this day met at 
the house of Deacon Crofut and unanimously made 
choice of Mr. Thomas Allen to settle with them in the 
work of the Gospel Ministry. 

Attest: Stephen Crofut, Moderator. 



17 

" It was the province of the Church to select the 
minister, of the town if it approved to ratify the 
choice, and fix the salary, and of the Proprietors of 
the sixty lots, to provide the ' settlement ' or outfit of 
the pastor-elect." Therefore at a meeting at the house 
of Deacon Crofut, on the fifth of March, 1764, the 
town concurred in the choice of the Church of a 
pastor, Mr. Allen, and tendered him " a salary of 
i6o per annum, to be increased £5 yearly, until it 
should reach £80 which was then to become his stated 
stipend." 

Let me quote Mr. Allen's letter of acceptance : — 

To the People of Pittsfield : 

Dear Brethren: — Your invitation of me to settle 
among you in the gospel ministry, I have received by 
your committee chosen for that purpose; and I appre- 
hend I have duly considered the same. In answer to 
this, your invitation, I v^^ould say that having sought 
divine direction, taken the advice of the judicious, and 
duly consulted my own judgment, I cannot but think 
it my duty to accept : and, accordingly do now declare 
my cordial acceptance of the same. I take this oppor- 
tunity to testify my grateful sense of your respect, shown 
in that unexpected good agreement and harmony that 
subsisted among you in the choice of one less than the 
least of all saints to preach the unsearchable riches of 
Christ. Nothing doubting but that at your next meeting 
you will freely grant forty to fifty cords of wood an- 
nually, or as much as you shall think sufficient, and some 
small addition to my settlement, either by grant in work, 
or whatever out of generosity by subscription or what- 
ever way you please. I now stand ready to be introduced 
to the work whereunto I am called, as soon as a con- 
venient opportunity shall present itself. 

These from your affectionate friend, 

Thomas Allen. 
Pittsfield, March 20, 1764. 



i8 

In April Mr. Allen was ordained. There were 
present Rev. Jonathan Ashley of Deerfield, Rev. Tim- 
othy Woodbridge of Hatfield, Rev. Samuel Hopkins 
of Great Barrington, Rev. Thomas Strong of New 
Marlborough and Rev. Adonijah Bidwell of No. i 
(now Tyringham). "The whole," says Mr. Allen's 
record, " was carried on with decency and order." 
The sermon was preached by Rev. Mr. Hooker of 
Northampton, who had been Mr. Allen's preceptor in 
his divinity studies. On January 7th, 1765, at a meet- 
ing held for that purpose it was voted : " That James 
Easton and Josiah Wright sustain the office of Dea- 
cons in this Church," thus completing the church 
equipment. 

The tribute which Dr. Jenkins pays to this epoch- 
making Christian endeavor is well worth repeating 
in its entirety, so forceful and illuminating is it in 
its literary excellence and in its appeal to the reverence 
of heroic ideals. He says, " Simplicity has its own 
severe and impressive grandeur. It is no mean story 
of worthy exploit, that of the Jesuits in Canada, with 
pictures, crosses, processions, altars, vestments, chant- 
ing. I witness all and allow it exceeding virtue: but 
more and truer grandeur has that scene which we have 
been looking upon, wherein men, plain men, self- 
moved and self-sufficient, convenanted with one an- 
other to serve Christ and maintain His cause here in 
the wilderness and sought and secured approval by 
truly apostolic men. The scene has no brilliance of 
color, no movement of chant or processional, but has 
a simplicity, seriousness, that makes it sure of being 
immortal; forever appealing to men with increasing 
force, as men rise into the life of ideas and of pure 
feeling." 



19 

Thomas Allen, the first minister of this Church, 
was born in Northampton, January 17, 1743. He 
was educated at Harvard where he graduated in 1762 
with high honors. His son, the Rev. William Allen, 
writes that his "father was of middle height, and slen- 
der, vigorous and active, of venerable gray hairs in 
his age, of a mild, pleasant, afifectionate countenance; 
hospitable to all visitors and always the glad welcomer 
of his friends. He was very honest and frank and 
had a keen sense of right and wrong and as he lived 
when high questions were debated, it is not strange 
that those whom he felt called upon to oppose should 
have sometimes charged him with indiscreet zeal: but 
he cherished no malice and his heart was always kind 
and tender." The history of this man's life is well 
known : serving his people as pastor for forty-six 
years, a patriot, a militant churchman, preaching the 
Gospel and commanding a body of patriots in the 
march to the battle of Bennington, a believer in liberty 
and holding his church and people together in the 
stormy times of the Revolution. The home of Pitts- 
field's first minister was just east of St. Stephen's 
church, and in the original grant of land to Mr. Allen, 
the boundaries of this tract extended northward nearly 
to Orchard Street and to the eastward. " It included 
one hundred acres for himself, another one hundred 
acres adjoining was set aside for the minister's sup- 
port." It is interesting to know that the minister's 
lot included the land of the present parsonage on East 
Street. When we remember what the name of Allen 
has meant to this town and church, it seems almost a 
sacrilege that the site of the home of the first minister 
of this church should be thrown upon the market for 
commercial purposes. Mr. Allen died at the age of 
sixty-seven, February nth, 1810. Toward the end of 



20 

Mr. Allen's pastorate, serious discord arose in the 
church, due in the main to bitter political differences; 
and the tide of feeling became so strong that a separa- 
tion of the church into two distinct bodies resulted. 
Many of the wealthier members of the church seceded 
and united themselves to form what was called the 
Union Parish. 

To preside over this church the Rev. Thomas 
Punderson of New Haven was called in August, 1809, 
and on the twenty-fifth of October was duly installed. 
Three months after Mr. Punderson's installation, Rev. 
Thomas Allen died. In Smith's History of Pittsfield 
it states that the solemn tolling of the bell announced 
to all within its sound that Thomas Allen had passed 
away. "Of many — whether they had adhered to, or 
become estranged from him in later conflicts, there 
were few in whose hearts that solemn knelling, as 
it came to them through the darkness, did not waken 
the most tender and thrilling memories." 

On August 10, 1810, the First Church chose Rev. 
William Allen to succeed his father as its pastor; and 
the parish concurring, he was duly installed. 

The Union Parish decided to build a separate meet- 
ing-house and it stood where the South Congregational 
Church now is on South Street. " It was a neat, taste- 
ful and convenient structure, with rather a graceful 
spire, and was supplied with a bell. After the re- 
union of the parishes it served a good purpose as a 
lecture- and school-room." 

The relations of the church and town are inter- 
esting from the fact that practically up to 1788 the 
church was the tozvn and the town the church. When, 
however, members of other denominations became 
citizens of the town, they naturally resented being 
taxed for the support of a minister and a church with 



21 



whom they had no reHgious affihations and to whose 
creed they might strenuously object. This was one 
of the main issues in the separation of the parish in 
1809. The vexed question was finally settled by a con- 
stitutional amendment in 1834, enacting a statute which 
" freeing towns from the obligation to support re- 
ligious teaching and worship, left everyone free to 
withdraw from his parish or society without joining 
another, and declared that no person thereafter should 
be made a member without his own express consent." 

To re-unite the warring factions in the two 
churches, that the political differences should be 
smoothed over, that the wounds of conflict should be 
healed, and that brotherly love should dwell among 
the hearts of men. Rev. William Allen resigned his 
pastorate and petitioned for his dismissal. This was 
duly acted upon, and on February 25th, 1817, Mr. Allen 
was relieved of his pastoral duties. After some deliber- 
ation and an ecclesiastical council, duly convened in 
July, 181 7, — carefully and prayerfully reviewing the 
causes of the estrangement, and the reasons why the two 
bodies should again be united, — it was voted by the 
council that the union of the churches should be estab- 
lished and it besought "the Great Head of the Church 
to cement it with that love which suffers long and is 
kind." "Soon and permanently the Congregational 
Church and Parish in Pittsfield became as distinguish- 
ed for peace and harmony as it had long been for the 
reverse." 

In order that the complete union of the two 
churches should be perfected. Rev. Air. Punderson re- 
signed his pastorate and was dismissed May 5, 1817. 
His successor was the Rev. Henian Humphrey. He 
came here from Fairfield, Conn., where he had been 
settled for ten years. The call from the now-united 



22 

churches to act as their pastor was to the young clergy- 
man a serious matter for consideration. He was aware 
of the differences that had occurred, and shrank from 
the prospect of a possible failure as a peacemaker 
and a strong and forceful leader. That he, however, 
did accept the call, and that under his wise guidance 
the church in its re-united strength became again a 
vital factor in the affairs of the town is well known. 
Mr. Humphrey was installed in 1817, and after six 
years of arduous work in the upbuilding of the church, 
was dismissed in 1823 to become the President of 
Amherst College. Of Mr. Humphrey, Dr. Jenkins 
says, " Many honors came to the man of whom I 
speak. His name is held in dear esteem in college 
halls, among philanthropists, among a great host of 
friends and by descendants proud of his blood in their 
veins, who do him honor. We take no leaf from all 
his wreaths : but the First Church of Pittsfield, re- 
members, reveres, loves Heman Humphrey as the 
man who made her peace, in virtue of whose bene- 
diction there can be no more variance or strife in 
the brotherhood he served." His home when he first 
came to Pittsfield was upon the land which was later 
owned by the Campbell family now included in the 
street, Willis Place, and the home of Dr. William L, 
Paddock. He resigned from the presidency of Am- 
herst College in 1845, ^^^ " his former parishioners 
plead with him to return to Pittsfield not now as 
pastor, but as friend " and he so decided. A new 
house adjacent to the Allen property having been 
built, it was bought by his sons for his home. The 
house is now occupied by Dr. Brace W. Paddock. 
He lived here revered by his former parishioners and 
townspeople until his death, 1861. His successors 
were: Rufus W. Bailey, installed April 15, 1824, 



23 

dismissed September 2.J, 1827; Henry P. Tappan, 
D. D., ordained September 16, 1828, dismissed No- 
vember I, 1 831; John W. Yeomans, D. D., installed 
March 7, 1832, dismissed in 1834; Horatio N. Brins- 
made, D. D., a most beloved pastor, installed Febru- 
ary II, 1835, dismissed September 9, 1841 ; John Todd, 
D. D., installed February 16, 1842, and who died when 
Pastor Emeritus, August 24, 1873. 

In 1844 the growth of the church and parish had 
assumed such proportions that it was deemed wise 
by several influential members that a second Congre- 
gational church should be organized. In 1848 the 
movement was definitely started. A building fund 
was inaugurated, and later the old lecture-room on 
South Street was purchased for the sake of the land 
on which it stood, and a strip thirty feet wide from 
the northern end of the parsonage garden was given 
to the new society to enlarge the original purchase. 
Thus the South Congregational Parish entered into 
the town's history. The church building was com- 
menced and was nearing completion, when it was de- 
stroyed by fire September 15, 1849. The rebuilding of 
the church was at once undertaken and it was com- 
pleted and dedicated November 10, 1850, by one hun- 
dred and thirty members who had been dismissed for 
that purpose from the First Church. Its first pastor 
was the Rev. Samuel Harris, of Conway, who was 
installed March 11, 185 1. The offspring of the 
Mother Church waxed strong and sturdy, and to-day, 
self-reliant, growing in numbers, proud of its history, 
it stands with its face to the East ready to do valiant 
work for the best interests of the town. 

John Todd was born October 9, 1800; he was a 
friend and classmate at Yale of Rev. Dr. Brinsmade. 
He came here from Philadelphia, where he had been 



24 

pastor for six years. For thirty-one years he was at 
the head of this church, devoted to the people, to the 
town and his country. A prohfic writer apart from 
his strictly ministerial work, a lecturer, a skilled 
craftsman with tools and lathe, " a true son of the 
forest and mountains " loving the camp fire, the lakes 
and streams of the Adirondack wilderness. His 
" Students' Manual " met with instant success and was 
a very popular work in its day. A large number of 
men doubtless owe to this one book their first im- 
pulses toward valuable educational ideas. To the 
writer as a lad, Dr. Todd's personal appearance was 
somewhat forbidding; tall, spare of frame, complex- 
ion swarthy, bristling, spiky, white hair, black frock- 
coat, a white neck cloth, a face rugged of feature, 
wearing glasses, with eyes keen but kindly, frequently 
twinkling with humor. After coming here, he writes 
to a friend of the conditions as he finds them: "It 
is a great, rich, proud, enlightened, powerful people. 
They move slowly, but they tread like the elephant. 
They are cool but kind, sincere, great at hearing, and 
very critical. * * The ladies are most abundant 
intelligent, refined and kind. A wider, better, harder or 
more interesting field no man need desire." During his 
long pastorate the church increased greatly in num- 
bers and in Christian influence. On account of failing 
health, in 1870, Dr. Todd in a communication to his 
people requested to be released from the responsibility 
and active duties of the pastorate, but desiring to con- 
tinue with them as pastor emeritus, " so that he might 
not feel that he was cut off from their sympathy." 
His request was acceded to, but with the condition that 
his resignation should be postponed for two years : 
but in May, 1872, a sudden illness warned him that to 
continue longer in his active work would possibly en- 



25 

danger his life. His request for release again being 
presented, it was at once granted with the most fer- 
vent expressions of love and sympathy. During his 
last, long and painful illness he dictated one Saturday 
evening the following note which was sent the next 
morning to every pulpit in town : 

"Rev. Dr. Todd having come to that border land which 
lies in a deep valley before we reach the new Jerusalem, 
and where he waits in entire uncertainty to know 
whether he is to dwell under the light of the Sun of 
Earth, or whether he may soon expect the full-orbed 
rising of the Sun of righteousness upon him: in either 
case he desires your prayers that, whatever may be the 
will of God, his soul may rejoice in it, and that his 
sins unnumbered may be all taken away by the Lamb 
of God which taketh away the sins of the world." 

He passed away Sabbath morning, August 24th, 
1873, in the parsonage on South Street, which had 
been his home during all his life in Pittsfield. During 
the last year or two of Dr. Todd's retirement, the 
active pastorate was filled by the Rev. Edward O. 
Bartlett, who came here from Providence, R. I. He 
resigned in January, 1876. 

In April, 1877, the church was most fortunate in 
its selection of a successor to Mr. Bartlett in the per- 
son of Rev. Jonathan L. Jenkins, then settled over 
the Congregational Church in Amherst. Mr. Jenkins 
was born in Portland, Maine, November 27,, 1830, a 
son of Rev. Charles Jenkins, who died when the son 
Avas thirteen months old. The grandmother of Mr. 
Jenkins on the maternal side, was a daughter of Presi- 
dent Stiles of Yale; and a cousin of President Stiles 
was one of the eight founders of this church. Mr. 
Jenkins graduated from Yale in the class of 185 1, 
also from its theological seminary, and was for a 



26 

short time at Andover. His first pastorate was at 
Lowell, where he remained seven years. Following 
the Lowell pastorate he was called to the Pearl Street 
Church in Hartford and later to the Church in Am- 
herst where he remained ten years. In July, 1877, 
he was installed over this church, the Rev. Dr. Storrs, 
of Brooklyn, preaching the installation sermon. After 
serving this church for fifteen years, he accepted a 
call to the State Street Congregational Church in Port- 
land, his native city. He most acceptably presided 
over this large, influential church for nearly ten years, 
and then decided to relinquish active ministerial work. 
The later years of his life were spent in or near 
Boston, with frequent visits here, preaching in differ- 
ent pulpits to the great delight and edification of his 
former parishioners, and leading the serene, peaceful, 
cultivated life of a gentleman and ripe scholar. Here 
in this town which he loved, near the church of whose 
history he was so proud, surrounded by those most 
near and dear to him, he quietly passed away, August 
15, 191 3, in the eighty-second year of his age. Much 
could be said of Mr. Jenkins as a man and Christian 
minister, of his keenness of mind, his unusual gift of 
expression, his convincing logic, and that wondrous 
gift, the gift of humor. He was tender in speech 
and action when tenderness and sympathy were most 
needed, seeing the best in men and women and shun- 
ning that which was distasteful and of evil repute. 
In connection with the celebration of twenty-five 
years ago it was written of Mr. Jenkins : "He is 
one of the most genial of men, and any wholesome 
occasion that is social and familiar, that brings people 
together, that makes and renews, and strengthens, 
friendships, he enjoys with all his soul. * * * * 
He is delighted with good old books, quaint furniture, 



27 



ancient portraits, and }ret no man reads with more 
alertness the new thoughts of the day, or keeps better 
informed of discoveries in the widening fields and 
the fresh developments of the world as they touch 
humanity, science and religion. The simplicity of the 
old homes, characters, ways, beliefs, charms him. 
The grandeur of the opportunities and achievements 
of to-day thrill him." The celebration in which he 
took such a prominent part was a rich treat to him, 
and the strength and glory of the First Church of the 
day were a satisfaction and a pride. In the intimate 
relations with his friends, and in the charming circle 
of his home life, Mr. Jenkins was at his best. Formal- 
ity, when necessary and wise, he respected and ad- 
judged highly; but the informality of the open fire, 
the presence of congenial and intimate associates was 
a stimulant to high thought and flashing wit. To the 
natural courtesy of a man richly endowed by educa- 
tion and social environments, was added a kindliness 
of nature and expression that drew men and women 
to him. In 1892, when Mr. Jenkins severed his con- 
nections with this church, the record of the Parish 
reads : " He has with rare intellectual power upheld 
the dignity and influence of the pulpit in this com- 
munity. He has not been content to give valuable 
service to this Parish alone, but he has in many ways 
contributed to the forwarding of good works in the 
community of which the Parish is a part." In the 
records of the ratification by the ecclesiastical council 
of the action of the Church and Parish appears the 
following : " We cannot dismiss our brother without 
making common confession with the church which has 
had the honor of his long and able service and with 
the community distinguished by the luster of his pow- 
ers and by his help in many good ways, that we are 



28 

losers of rare treasure. We shall miss a stimulating 
and enlightening mind gifted with wisdom which is 
according to godliness and with forms of sound words. 
We shall be poorer in riches of grace and brotherly 
kindness. We shall lose a preacher of Jesus Christ, 
skillful to unveil before men the beautiful, command- 
ing face of divine truth. Fortunate, indeed, will be 
that people which shall receive the ministry of his 
good words and good works making our loss its gain." 
In 1894, on the 130th anniversary of the founding 
of the Church, Dr. William V. W. Davis was installed 
as its pastor. To another has been delegated the op- 
portunity and privilege of expressing the appreciation 
of his service to the Church and city. 

Of the meeting-houses of this Church there have 
been three. The various incidents relative to their 
building, site, size and structure have been admirably 
set forth in the paper by Mr. William L. Adam read 
at the anniversary twenty-five years ago. To briefly 
recapitulate may be of interest and value. The First 
Church described in the beginning of this paper, built 
in 1764, rough, crude, severe in its extreme simplicity, 
served as a meeting-house for town and church until 
1790. Then a little north of the old Church was erected 
the second building. Its architect was Charles Bul- 
finch, " the impress of whose skill," Mr. Adam says, 
" is upon the enlarged Faneuil Hall, upon the State 
House in Boston and upon the Capitol at Washington." 
" This new building could have held within it three 
houses as large as its little predecessor still standing 
but a few feet in front of it." In 1834 it was slightly 
damaged by fire, and again in 185 1 fire wrought havoc 
with its interior. It was deemed unwise to expend 
further sums upon its repair and alterations and it 
was accordingly sold and moved from its foundations. 
It finally became the property of Wellington Tyler, 



29 



who then conducted a successful young ladies' board- 
ing-school, called the Maplewood Young Ladies' In- 
stitute, and was used for a gymnasium and class rooms. 
It is still to be seen forming a part of the Maplewood 
Hotel property on North Street and used principally 
as a music room. The third structure you see here 
to-day, admirable in its architectural design with its 
graceful springing arches, and well proportioned in- 
terior; the most churchly building in town, a delight 
to the eye, unconsciously demanding reverential 
demeanor by its very beauty. The recent remodeling 
has taken on the original design, harmonious in line 
and detail. It was work well carried out, and due 
credit should be given those who spent much time and 
thought and love in making this house a fitting place 
for the worship of God. 

In closing this fragmentary sketch may I quote 
from the paper on the relations of the Church and 
Parish, read by the late Judge James M. Barker 
twenty-five years ago? "For more than a century 
and a half this ground has been set apart for religious 
uses. Never has it known the ownership of a private 
individual for private ends. No plough held by hus- 
bandman seeking earthly harvest has scarred its sur- 
face. By no structure reared for man's own gain, or 
pride, or pleasure, has it ever been polluted. * * * 
Even as this site has been saved throughout the ages 
for its present use, so, by His Providence, have the 
Parish and the Church been kept, and are today here ! 
Strong! But now with no strength borrowed from 
the arm of civil authority, and in the present rather 
than the standing order, ready and able, without forced 
or extraneous human aid, to spread abroad yet more 
effectually the ' glad tidings of great joy to all men.' " 
Long live the First Church of Christ (Congrega- 
tional) which is in Pittsfield ! 




/yonnt/i (i/i ^). Jyenk L f I ci -JJ ..Jj. 



THE ORIGIN, HISTORY AND 

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE NEW YEAR'S 

SUNRISE PRAYER MEETING 



By Miss Julia Wallace Redfield 



The origin of an idea is always interesting, — the 
steam engine, the wireless telegraph, town meeting and 
representative government, a free church in a free 
state. Some origins are known, some disputed, some 
duplicated, some legendary or unknown. In this last 
category we must place the origin of the idea of a 
New Year's sunrise prayer meeting. I have had ex- 
pert help, from the Congregational Library in Boston, 
from Yale, Hartford and Union Seminaries, but with 
no results. Tradition says the idea came from Cole- 
brook, Connecticut, but an antiquarian, old enough to 
remember 1845, to whom an interested Colebrook man 
referred me, writes : " I am sure you will find Cole- 
brook an absolutely barren field for your purpose." 
A possible clue in Goshen, Connecticut, was also bar- 
ren. Somewhere in the Litchfield County hills there 
may be a trail, but it is blocked by the fallen trees of 
a century, and there is no thoroughfare. 

In Pittsfield the path is plainer. My father moved 
here in 1867. In the fall of that year, he was told that 
the New Year's prayer meeting originated as a conse- 
quence of the great Nettleton revival. It was a new 
idea to him though he came from Cromwell, Middle- 



Z2 

sex County, Connecticut. The Nettleton revival was 
well worth celebrating. It lasted in Pittsfield from the 
spring of 1820 to October, 1821, and occupies a large 
place in the religious histories of the time. This re- 
vival was in the pastorate of the Rev. Dr. Humphrey 
of the First Church, 1817 to 1823. 

Carlyle says somewhere that all history is a mis- 
take. The first suspicion that this tradition was not 
true came from reading the histories of this revival, 
and then Dr. Humphrey's biography by his son. Rev. 
Dr. Zephaniah Humphrey and his son-in-law. Rev. Dr. 
Henry Neill. Dr. Neill was pastor of the church in 
Lenox, and later lived in Pittsfield several years. If 
an institution so honored and loved as this had been 
founded in Dr. Humphrey's pastorate, it could not 
have escaped notice in this biography. Some years 
later his daughter, Miss Sarah W. Humphrey, of 
radiant memory, wrote the sketch of her father's life 
for the Humphrey genealogy, but she has no word 
of the establishment of the New Year's prayer meet- 
ing. Family and local pride would have ascribed the 
prayer meeting to his pastorate if possible. The mis- 
take probably arose from the confusion of the Nettle- 
ton revival with another great one, which lasted at 
intervals from 1812 to 1816. The Pittsfield Sun of 
February 17, 1875, has a leading article on " Some 
Great Revivals." After telling of the origin of the 
Methodist Church in Pittsfield, it continues : " The 
spirit of the Lord was at work in all denominations, 
but with no marked effect in Pittsfield. There were 
too many dissensions among His people. These dis- 
sensions, mostly of a political character, began to abate 
at the close of the war of 1812. Pittsfield churches 
shared in the great refreshing of 1815, and manifested 
their harmony by uniting in instituting the New 



33 

Year's prayer meeting, January first, 1816, which has 
since become one of Pittsfield's most cherished insti- 
tutions." 

At the meeting on New Year's day, 1880, Deacon 
James H. Dunham of the South Church made an ad- 
dress on the origin of the New Year's prayer meeting, 
reported in the Sun of the fourteenth of January of 
that year. Deacon Dunham said : "I will answer the 
question long and often asked, that according to the in- 
disputable authority of the late Mrs. Fenn, the custom 
of holding this meeting was commenced on the morn- 
ing of the new year of 1816, while the Congregational 
denomination, which then composed a great majority 
of the people of the town, was still divided into two 
parishes. The people had already become sensible of 
the folly and wickedness of this division, and this 
New Year's morning union prayer meeting was an in- 
dication and effect of the new desire for the harmony 
which in 181 7 resulted in the union of the two churches 
under Dr. Humphrey. It is called the town prayer 
meeting because when it was established, the First 
Congregational Parish was a town parish, and its 
meetings town meetings." The Pittsfield meeting is 
unique in this respect, that being founded as a town 
meeting in the old town church, it has continued such, 
so that all inhabitants of town and city, who profess 
and call themselves Christians, of every name, and 
many others beside, have united in sustaining it. All 
other New Year's meetings are church prayer meet- 
ings. Deacon Dunham became a resident of Pittsfield 
in 18 19, and attended almost every New Year's prayer 
meeting from that date to his death in 1890. He was 
a careful man, whose statements were thoroughly to 
be trusted. At the one hundred and twenty-fifth anni- 
versary in 1889, Mr. Dunham wrote the paper on "The 
Missionaries from the First Church." 



34 

Mrs. Curtis T. Fenn (Parthenia Dickinson) daugh- 
ter of one of Pittsfield's oldest families, was born here 
in 1798. She united with the First Church in 1816, 
leaving it in 1850 when the South Church was formed. 
She was one of the original members of the Free 
Will, and in her later life laid the corner stone of 
the House of Mercy. She died in 1878, honored and 
respected, keeping her memory and interest in all town 
affairs to the last. 

What were the dissensions which split the First 
Church, whose quieting was the direct cause of the 
establishing of the New Year's prayer meeting? They 
were not theological. The Unitarian controversy which 
convulsed eastern New England made no trouble here. 
The division was political, social, financial, based on 
different theories of government, and different ideas, 
according to the point of view, of the necessary or un- 
necessary participation of the United States in the 
world-politics of the time. I take these facts entirely 
from a bound volume of contemporary pamphlets on 
both sides, which is in the Athenaeum. The division 
began in the last days of Washington's administration, 
and was only quieted after the peace of 1815. The 
leaders were the Rev. Thomas Allen, for the Repub- 
licans (the Democrats of to-day) ; and for the Fed- 
eralists, Woodbridge Little, trustee and benefactor of 
Williams College, and Ashbel Strong, one of the Mas- 
sachusetts Committee of Correspondence, to whose 
potent influence the union of the thirteen Colonies was 
largely due. New England's fisheries and her ocean 
carrying-trade were crippled by the Napoleonic wars. 
A possible port in China was the only one in the world 
left open to her, while Jefferson's embargo shut up 
her ships in our own harbors. A grave financial his- 



1231139 

35 

torian* writes that the efforts of Albert Gallatin, 
Jefferson and Madison's Secretary of the Treasury, 
for honest dealing and sound finance, only served to 
increase the fury of the anti-Federalists. Large in- 
vestments of foreign capital in our untried securities 
were denounced as engines designed to overturn our 
civil liberties. Byron says historians should be made 
up of wrath and partiality. You may accuse me of 
both, if I confess entire sympathy with Little and 
Strong. They were challenged from the pulpit for 
more than four years before they acted. They were 
Lowell's men, " stern men with empires in their 
brains." They could not sit quietly in the circle of these 
hills, like another Appalachian America, and see the 
strong currents of new national life run round their 
citadel. They were of the men of whom Senator Lodge 
writes in his History of Boston that the action of the 
New England towns shook the country and forced 
the repeal of the embargo. They would not have been 
worthy of Bunker Hill behind them and Gettysburg 
and Mission Ridge ahead if they had done otherwise. 
One of these pamphlets states this was the only 
church in New England so divided. The trouble be- 
gan Thanksgiving Day, 1802, when several men left 
the meeting house during the sermon. In 1803 the 
Pittsfield Sun writes of the Federalists, " Their party 
spirit is hostile to all friendly intercourse, destroys 
good neighborhood, warps the judgment, and under- 
mines the whole system of moral virtues; makes men 
' tygers,' cruel and sanguinary, — that Federal malig- 
nity, insolence, fine and imprisonment were opposed 
by Republican meekness, patience and generosity." In 
a sermon, November 15, 1804, we find this sentence: 



(*) Horace White: "Money and Banking," page 286. 



36 

" In Federalism we see nothing but oppugnation to 
the principles of the Christian religion and to the 
genius and spirit of the Gospel." In February, 1807, 
the first step was taken to divide the church. A mu- 
tual council was asked for on the thirtieth of April, 
which was refused then, and later in the same sum- 
mer. In December, a large section of the church ap- 
plied to the Legislature for the organization of a new 
parish. In 1808, the Union Parish Church was or- 
ganized. In February, 1809, those who had left the 
First Church were laid under censure, " after a scene 
of altercation, lasting till near night, an exhibition of 
vehemence and passion which covered the friends of 
religion with the deepest blush of shame." These are 
the words of the Rev. William Allen. At this time 
the membership of the Union Parish consisted of 
forty persons, thirty-six of whom came from the First 
Church, seventeen men, later reduced to sixteen " one 
having confessed his sin." Some were then under 
censure, and the rest were yet to be dealt with. The 
male members remaining were seventeen ; females, 
sixty ; a proportion familiar in later times. Mr. Allen 
writes, August 1809, " In the First Church at the 
last communion nine males were present, forty fe- 
males. One or two males may yet withdraw. The 
only effect will be to make themselves liable to censure 
and if that is ineffectual, to excommunication with the 
others." An ex parte council was called in August, 
1809, consisting of Rev. Mr. Collins of Lanesboro, 
Rev. Mr. Catlin of New Marlboro, Rev. Samuel Shep- 
ard of Lenox, and Rev. Dr. Alvin Hyde of Lee. An 
address was sent to them, from which I take two 
paragraphs. "An ex parte council, of which you were 
members, met in this town on the first day of August, 
in consequence of letters missive from the separating 



Z7 

members of this church, who have for a long time 
been under its censure and suspended from its com- 
munion, as disorderly walkers and covenant breakers, 
with a view to exonerate them from the just censures 
of this church, and did vote, it was expedient to form 
another church here, and that the censure passed on 
such members should be no bar to their being admitted 
into the church, and they did appoint you, we are 
told, to come here and incorporate these censured 
members into another church. You have supported 
and encouraged these offenders in a clandestine man- 
ner for years past. You come here as promoters of 
sedition and rebellion in the church of Christ. Your 
procedure cannot help the cause of Federalism in this 
town and County which is its principal object, but will 
prove its overthrow, and bring it and yourselves into 
disgrace, and divide the church in this County, a ma- 
jority of whose members are believed to be Republi- 
cans, whilst you cast us out of your communion, they 
will cast you out of theirs." One of the charges 
brought against Rev. Thomas Allen was that he spent 
more time in the Sun printing office, writing editorials, 
than in his study, composing sermons, and was often 
seen in that office an hour after sunset on Saturday 
evenings. That was a total disregard of the fourth 
commandment. The biographer of Dr. Humphrey 
writes : " The sunset of Saturday was the hither 
bound of holy time. Then work ceased, and all were 
enjoined to lay aside worldly cares, and compose 
themselves for the worship of the following day." 
She describes the division thus : ** The church was 
rent by a political convulsion. After seven years of 
division in separate churches, and much bitterness of 
feeling and recrimination, there was found to be a 
strong and genuine disposition to re-unite. Both pas- 



38 

tors resigned. The two congregations came together 
under the old roof, and Dr. Humphrey was invited 
to take the task of promoting organic union, a difficult 
work. Neighborhoods and families had been involved 
in the long-standing and bitter quarrel, but under his 
judicious management, and by the exercise of patient 
energy and wise counsels, old wounds were healed 
and the spirit of harmony took the place of discord." 

Church records are spicy reading. When the 
move was made to return to the First Church, it was 
not received graciously by them. The vote passed in 
church meeting, June 30, 1815, reads: "As they pro- 
fess repentance of their sin in leaving us in an irreg- 
ular manner, now, therefore, although retaining our 
persuasion that the foundation of the church of Union 
Parish was laid in error and irregularity, yet influ- 
enced by the desire of promoting the interests of the 
Gospel of peace, we vote that we will hereafter over- 
look, in our measures of discipline, the offence which 
has been acknowledged and will treat the church of 
Union Parish as a Christian church." 

The Rev. Thomas Punderson was installed over 
the Union Parish Church in October, 1809. He came 
from Goshen, Conn., where he had studied theology 
with Rev. Asahel Hooker. Among his fellow students 
were Heman Humphrey and Noah Porter, whose only 
sister Mr. Humphrey married. Mrs. Humphrey was 
the first President of the Free Will Society, organized 
in August, 1819. Some of us remember her, an alert 
and vigorous old lady, living until 1868 in the house 
on the northeast corner of East and First streets, now 
occupied by Dr. Brace W. Paddock. 

Now that we know the actors in the drama, I enter 
upon what Professor Harnack calls " unrestrained 
suppositions." We have seen that tradition has con- 



39 

fused two revivals. Little is known of Mr. Punder- 
son, but I am inclined to think that tradition has con- 
fused the Litchfield County towns, and that if the 
prayer meeting idea came from Connecticut at all, 
it came with him from Goshen. Dr. Hyde of Lee was, 
of course, his friend, being a member of that ex parte 
council which ordained, installed, and later dismissed 
him. The prayer meeting was begun in Pittsfield in 
i8i6 during Mr. Punderson's pastorate. One like it 
was begun by his friend Dr. Hyde in Lee nearly at 
the same time. In a letter dated January 4, 1819, Dr. 
Hyde writes : " On the morning of New Year's day 
we had a meeting for prayer and praise at the meeting 
house just as the sun rose, attended by nearly five 
hundred people. It was truly a solemn hour. The 
same has been our practice for several years."* His- 
torians have an axiom that " One fact is gossip and 
two are history." Here are two facts in Pittsfield 
and Lee. A son of this church, Rev. William W. 
Rockwell, Professor of Church History in Union 
Seminary, after much research says: "I am incHned 
to think it originated here." The idea may have orig- 
inated in Mr. Punderson's brain and heart. While 
history has forgotten him, tradition ascribes it to his 
native state. Certainly these men originated and fos- 
tered it in the two Berkshire towns. We may be very 
sure that, finding such an instrument ready to his 
hand, instituted to promote harmony, Mr. Punderson's 
fellow student, Dr. Humphrey, pastor of the re-united 



(*) The late Marshall Foote of Lee used to say that he was 
taken as a child about twelve years old to the first meet- 
ing in 1818. Dr. Rowland, for many years pastor of the 
church in Lee, questioned the accuracy of the statement 
as it does not agree with Dr. Hyde's record of " several 
years." 



40 

church, strengthened it in critical years, and that the 
Nettleton revival assisted his efforts. 

The Rev. Dr. Edward Taylor of Binghamton, New 
York, born in Lee in 1821, wrote to that church in 
1901 : "One of the most spiritually fruitful instru- 
mentalities of my ministry has been the meeting on 
the morning of the New Year. I have attended eighty 
such, being taken to the first in my mother's arms. 
Wherever I have been pastor, this service has been 
permanently established, and its three stout stitches 
of Praise, Prayer and Purpose have turned a good 
hem on many a year that would otherwise have raveled 
out." Dr. Taylor lived until 1902, not missing one 
of eighty-one meetings on New Year's Day in Lee and 
in thirteen churches which he served.* I know of only 
one of these which is not now held, Hinsdale. So far 
has the little candle lighted in Pittsfield thrown its 
beams. Dr. Llewellyn Pratt started a New Year's 
prayer meeting in North Adams, and afterwards in 
Norwich, Conn. The latter has been given up. The 
only other one of which I ever heard is in the Fourth 
Presbyterian Church in Albany, founded by New Eng- 
land people in 1829. This is held at six o'clock in the 
morning. I went once. 

Our forefathers, like the Athenians, were very 
religious. New Year's Day was to them a season of 
searching self-examination, of stern resolution and re- 
newed consecration. Probably for these reasons they 



(*) These churches were Hinsdale, Mass.; John Street Pres- 
byterian Church, Lansing;burg, N. Y. ; Kalamazoo, Mich. ; 
South Congregational Church, Brooklyn, N. Y. ; First 
Congregational Church, Binghamton, N. Y. ; Norwich, 
N. Y. ; Plymouth Church, Utica, N. Y. ; Newark Valley, 
N. Y. ; Greene, N. Y. ; Cortlandt, N. Y. ; Oswego, N. Y. ; 
Whitney's Parish, N. Y. ; and Susquehanna, Penn. I 
owe this information to Dr. Taylor's son, Mr. L. W. 
Taylor of Binghamton. 



41 

selected that day for their town prayer meeting. Noth- 
ing with a poHtical taint could have been chosen. But 
there were ardent souls in Pittsfield who were not 
satisfied with one sunrise prayer meeting. We owe 
to Mr. Robert C. Rockwell the discovery in the files 
of the Pittsfield Sun that a prayer meeting was holden 
in the Pittsfield Meeting House with fervour and holy 
zeal, at the rising of the sun — 4.30 a, m. — July 4, 1825, 
and for three years thereafter. The contagion of 
example spread. The Berkshire Association, at their 
meeting in New Marlborough, November 9, 1827, 
recommended to the churches a religious observance of 
July Fourth — a good thought in itself — but accom- 
panied by the recommendation that the day be com- 
menced with meetings for prayer at sunrise. Since 
1828, Pittsfield seems to have left the rising with the 
sun on the Fourth of July to a less religious rising 
generation. 

During Dr. Todd's life the ministers of the town 
always sat in front on the deacons' seat. This was 
changed because it was thought that the laymen were 
overpowered by the galaxy of ministers, and would 
speak better if the clergy were scattered through the 
house. This custom has varied in recent years. No. 
tradition has come down to us of any special New 
Year's day. Mr. Gilbert West has attended these 
meetings since 1842, having missed but one in seventy- 
two years, on account of a funeral out of town. On 
his authority we know that the meetings in 1852 and 
1853 were held in the hall of Burbank's old block 
over Cooley's store, which the old church was occupy- 
ing after the fire of January 9, 185 1. In January, 
1854, what did a New England Puritan community 
think of this Gothic roof which might be in the Eng- 



42 

lish Berkshire? The rill has now grown into a river. 
The current moves so calm and deep that it leaves 
little history behind it. 

Many people say that the special characteristic of 
this meeting is its atmosphere. A letter from a mem- 
ber of the Lee church describes this well. " The New 
Year's prayer meeting is one of our institutions, and 
has been held from time immemorial. It was origin- 
ally a sunrise meeting, but in these degenerate times 
it is held at the rational hour of eight. In former 
times families ate by lamp light, and the chapel was 
lighted in the same primitive way. Breakfasts were 
in vogue then, but a second cup of coffee was ready 
on the return from the meeting, and there were drop- 
pers-in of people who had driven from a distance to 
the service. It is a meeting always full, and men 
are always seen there who may not enter the chapel 
again for another year. Veterans come and reminisce, 
and young people are expected to be in attendance, 
no matter what the gaieties and late hours of the night 
before. The traditions of the meeting are cherished 
by generation after generation, and we hope it will 
never be discontinued." 

Those of us who have been here long will always 
associate 

" While with ceaseless course the sun " 
and 

" Great God, we sing that mighty hand " 

with the greetings of neighbors and friends in the 
aisles and on the steps of this church. Deacon Dun- 
ham said in 1880: "Strangers and visitors in town 
express great delight in these meetings. I well 
recollect General Briggs' expression in regard to the 
first one he attended. He knew nothing of it until 
he came into the street and asked why the bell was 



43 

ringing — there was but one — and was told it was for 
the New Year's prayer meeting of the town. He re- 
solved to attend, and doing so, was delighted. To 
him the idea of the whole town assembling at such a 
time and for such a purpose, was so good and so 
appropriate that he attended the meeting as long as 
he lived, and he was a man the people delighted to 
hear." 

Of what significance has the meeting been all these 
years ? No earthly commission can answer that ques- 
tion or estimate the value of the product. Spiritual 
things are spiritually discerned. Mrs. Stowe says in 
" Old Town Folks " : " The briefness of these periods 
and the inevitable gravitation of everybody back to 
earth has sometimes been mentioned with a sneer." 
Churches have died and towns degenerated in Massa- 
chusetts. Dr. Jenkins in his pastoral prayer used often 
to return thanks for the restraining grace which pre- 
vented us, so that we never had behaved as badly as 
we might. As a community, if we have not behaved 
as badly as we might, we have by no means lived up to 
high civic ideals or to our own best leadership. 
Individually, if once, before New Year's Day is over, 
the quick word has been checked and a more gracious 
one spoken; if once the Golden Rule has conquered 
David Harum's version, " Do to the other fellow what 
he would do to you, and do it first," the blessed law 
of habit has taken a new hold, and it is easier to 
do the generous and true thing later in the year. 

" One of Pittsfield's cherished institutions." Why? 
Because we believe — no, we go farther. In Jean In- 
gelow's words 

"We know past all doubting truly, 

A knowledge deeper than faith can dim," 



44 

that on the moral and religious qualities, represented 
however imperfectly, by such institutions as this, rests 
our only hope of the permanence of city, state and na- 
tion. Lord Haldane, speaking to the American Bar 
Association in Montreal last summer, said he had cross- 
ed the Atlantic to advocate for the three nations in 
their international relations, the moral rules enjoined 
by private conscience and the spirit of the community 
for which English has no word, but which the Germans 
call sittlichkeit; the system of habitual or customary 
conduct, ethical rather than legal, embracing all those 
obligations of citizenship which it is bad form or not 
the thing to disregard, the social penalty for which is 
being cut or looked at askance. Such a community 
spirit might rule here that a new citizen of Pittsfield 
should feel the surrounding pressure of this sittlichkeit 
so that an intuitive sense of moral obligation would 
lead him to present himself and his family before God 
and the assembly at the New Year's prayer meeting, 
and if he did not, he should realize the intangible but 
by no means unfelt sense of the community that such 
attendance is expected of him. 

In the darkest days of Holland's struggle the 
Prince of Orange took for his motto : "Je maintien- 
drai " — I will maintain. We do not know the mean- 
ing of the word struggle. It may lie ahead. Some- 
times we seem to 

"lightly hold 
The prize which brave men died to gain." 

But granite underlies New England yet, though loose 
gravel and shifting sand may be uppermost. The 
courage and endurance of Leyden and Plymouth can 
be relied upon when needed. " We will maintain " 
the faith of our fathers, living still, as represented by 



45 

such institutions as Pittsfield's New Year's sunrise 
prayer meeting against attacks indifferent, scornful, 
insidious or stormy. When the thousand years of 
Canterbury and Winchester shall have been equalled 
and passed, and the sun rises on New Year's morning 
over the jewelled whiteness of our New England 
hills — ours just as much then as now — some one will 
be heard singing 

"And here Thy name, O God of love, 
Their children's children shall adore. 
Till these eternal hills remove, 

And spring adorns the earth no more." 




WMiam r^WSL.^ QQ) 



AN APPRECIATION OF THE 

MINISTRY OF 

WILLIAM VAIL WILSON DAVIS 



By Charles L. Hibbard 



The occasion and subject make it fitting I choose 
a text for this address. In the thirtieth chapter of 
Ezekiel, the thirty-third verse, we read : "And when 
this Cometh to pass (lo, it will come) then shall they 
know that a prophet hath been among them." 

Some recent author, whose name and book escape 
me, has spoken of his principal character in this man- 
ner and I quote it as an appropriate foreword : " You 
had but to see him to know that he was not quite the 
ordinary man. There was something lofty and detached 
about his face. He was of those who are just one 
step ahead of their own generation. If he lived to 
be an old man, humanity would have caught up with 
him and he would die abreast of his times. All his 
life he had cherished the ineradicable conviction that 
Something was coming, Something Big and Beautiful 
and that Something Christ." 

The twelfth minister of this church was the Rev. 
William Vail Wilson Davis. He succeeded the Rev. 
Jonathan L. Jenkins who had been here for fifteen 
years and whose resignation was, on July 25th, 1892, 
formally acted upon by an ecclesiastical council held 
pursuant to letters missive sent out from this church. 
The call to Dr. Davis was accepted by him in a letter 



48 

received by the joint parish and church committee 
on Monday, September 4, 1893. The pastorate was 
thus vacant a Httle more than a year. 

Dr. Davis was born on February 17, 1851, in 
Wilson, New York. He fitted for college at Willis- 
ton Academy in Easthampton and entered Amherst 
from which he graduated in the class of 1873. Im- 
mediately afterward, he went to Constantinople where 
he had received an appointment as professor in Robert 
College. After a year's work, he resigned and travelled 
extensively through the Oriental countries. This 
experience, though short in duration, had a profound 
effect upon his life, mental outlook and interests. Re- 
turning to America, he taught for a time in Amherst 
but, yielding to the deep spiritual suggestions and de- 
mands of his nature, he soon forsook the teacher's 
chair and began to study in Andover Theological Sem- 
inary from which he graduated in 1877. In Septem- 
ber of that year he was ordained to the ministry and 
immediately became pastor of the Franklin Street Con- 
gregational Church in Manchester, New Hampshire, 
succeeding Rev. Dr. W. J. Tucker, who was later Pres- 
ident of Dartmouth College. From this position he 
resigned in 1882 to accept the pastorate of the Euclid 
Avenue Presbyterian Church in Cleveland, Ohio, then 
one of the largest and most influential churches in that 
state. Because of Mrs. Davis's health, he resigned 
this position after five years of most successful work 
in the midst of congenial surroundings and among 
cordial friends. The Union Congregational Church 
of Worcester next sought and received his services. 
His growing reputation as a scholar and preacher had 
preceded him and there he labored faithfully and suc- 
cessfully until this church sought and invited him to 
be its pastor and preacher. He was thus a little over 



49 



forty-two years of age when he came to Pittsfield with 
his wife and their young family. He had just entered 
upon the period of middle life when his natural powers 
were at their best. Here for seventeen years he labored 
and gave of his best and, on the twenty-fifth day 
of August, 1910, left us in the full strength of his 
body and mind and seemingly with many long years 
of service before him. 

This is a sketch in brief of the life of the man 
of whom I speak to-day, but it is the least and most 
unimportant side. 

It now becomes my privilege to speak of him as 
preacher, as pastor, as citizen and as man. But how 
shall I analyse his personality and present the influ- 
ences which he gave forth in this church and commun- 
ity with justice and wisdom, his was so singularly an 
elusive personality and at times difficult to understand. 
Perhaps I shall do best and be most just if I briefly and 
fairly state the conditions under which he came into 
this church and the manner in which he met them. 

When the pastorate became vacant, there was a 
division of sentiment which expressed itself forcibly 
in certain directions but never affected that sense of 
loyalty and devotion to the church as a whole which 
has been such a distinguishing characteristic of this 
people. Because of this condition of affairs a rather 
impersonal feeling of cordiality and responsiveness 
awaited any man called to fill the vacancy. 

Dr. Davis had first to meet the test in the pulpit. 
This church had for fifteen years listened to Dr. 
Jenkins. His was a wondrous gift of graceful speech. 
Words flowed golden from his lips. There was a 
charm of diction rarely found, a perfect choice of 
word and phrase, a richness and mellowness of tone 
which delighted the ear. And all clothed the thought 



50 

of an educated, cultivated, original thinker. To come 
into this pulpit, with the still lingering aroma of all 
this charm and inspiration about it, was no mean task 
or test. Yet Dr. Davis was equal to the task and 
testing. Perhaps he had not quite the charm of lan- 
guage of which I have spoken but his speech came 
strong, vigorous, fresh, impressive and distinguished 
by rugged eloquence and convincing earnestness. It, 
too, clothed no mean thought. The early training 
of the scholar and the teacher, perhaps better, the 
strong, natural, mental attitude showed vigorously in 
his pulpit and public utterances. To many at first his 
speech was difficult and hard to follow but not so to 
one who became accustomed to his enunciation or was 
attentive to the spiritual elements so markedly found 
in his addresses. He at once took front rank among 
our preachers and maintained that position to the end. 
He was no servile follower adopting the path hewn 
out by another. He did his own thinking. It is no 
easy task to stand in this pulpit Sabbath after Sabbath 
for seventeen long years and preach sermon after ser- 
mon without repetition or without loss of power. To 
be always in front of your congregation in spiritual 
and mental leadership is the true position of the suc- 
cessful minister, and this Dr. Davis always was. Many 
of his sermons were built about a skeleton of philos- 
ophy and full of philosophic phrases and ideas difficult 
for the lay mind to grasp, but no sermon ever here 
fell from his lips, which, understood, failed to uplift, 
encourage, lead on to God and the coming of His 
Kingdom here on earth. Viewed in the large aspect 
he was a mental giant and filled this pulpit with dig- 
nity, with honor and with power, a fit successor to the 
strong men who had preceded him. So great was this 
intellectual power that his field of activity might have 



SI 

been country-wide, but with inborn loyalty he saved 
for and gave to this church alone his best thought. 

He had next to meet the test of social relationship. 
Here too he was judged by a standard exceptionally 
high, for his predecessor had a social charm, a personal 
magnetism and a quality of good fellowship rarely 
equalled. Naturally Dr. Davis could not be like an- 
other — he must be himself. His nature was not one 
which fell readily into close personal relationship. 
He came into our midst, established himself as a part 
of our community life, entertaining and being enter- 
tained, and forming immediate, close friendship with 
those who understood him and his longings but he 
was not very successful with those who made com- 
parisons. He was easily the foremost in all gather- 
ings and a master in the art of conversation — this 
through sheer force of intellect rather than charm of 
manner or thought. 

The weakest element in the church at the time 
of his coming was its young people. Of this I speak 
with especial knowledge. Dr. Davis at once saw this 
weakness and rallied about him all of the boys and 
girls, the young men and young women. They came 
into the church in large numbers with fresh and vig- 
orous enthusiasm, with inherited loyalty to the insti- 
tution and with no prejudices. Dr. Davis's influence 
was immediate, strong and effective. The vigorous 
condition of this church to-day is largely due to that 
quick grasping of his opportunity and the steady, 
strong, uplifting leadership which he maintained to the 
end. It is probably true that we have not and cannot 
grasp the true measure of this influence. But I am not 
far wrong in saying that this was Dr. Davis's greatest 



52 

achievement in this church, and one for which this 
people should not only honor him but be profoundly 
and eternally grateful. 

And now I speak of him as a part of and a force 
in this community. He had a peculiarly sensitive and 
responsive nature. From the first, he was at home in 
these hills. Through the long summer days and the 
cold crisp months of winter, he walked abroad and 
drew in with every breath inspiration and enthusiasm. 
He was responsive to all of nature's moods. The 
jubilant notes of the birds, the slow, steady march up 
our mountain sides of life in the spring, the dying 
glories of our autumn foliage, the whispering winds 
in the pines, the waving grain fields, the sun-kissed 
waves of our mountain lakes, the deep blue of our 
June sky, the lazy drift of summer cloud, the ma- 
jesty and glory of the stars in their ordered courses, 
the hush of noon, the soft breath of night, even the 
fierce and rending crash of summer rain and fury 
of winter storm, all found in him a responsive lover. 
Each and every one of them was but evidence of the 
love, the gracious tenderness, the bounty, the majesty, 
the glory and the power of the great Creator with 
whom he came through these manifestations into close 
communion. 

With John Burroughs he found "^each day too 
short for all the thoughts I want to think, all the 
walks I want to take, all the books I want to read, 
all the friends I want to see." With him too he loved 
the feel of the grass under his feet and the sound of 
running streams by his side. " The hum of the wind 
in the tree tops " was always " good music " to him 
and " the face of the fields often comforted " him. 
He found with Tennyson in the "flower in the crannied 
wall " an expression of the will and love of the 



S3 

Creator. And when he was tired and lonely he sought 
Mother Nature and so found rest and inspiration and 
came more and more to feel the beauty and wonder 
of Hfe. 

It was his joy to live here and be thus in close 
and constant communion with all the beauty with 
which nature had endowed us, and it was while upon 
an expedition in the mountains to see and enjoy one 
of our especial places of beauty that he met with the 
accident which took him from us. 

He was laid to rest in our peaceful cemetery in 
the midst of " The Beautiful Mountains " where he 
wished to sleep the long sleep from which there is 
no awakening. 

To Dr. Davis Pittsfield meant home. And he was 
proud of this, his city. He could not bear to see any 
of its natural or acquired beauty destroyed. He it was 
who urged the City Beautiful. I give but one ex- 
ample of his interest. He could not look upon our 
filthy, unclean, unattractive Housatonic without a vis- 
ion of what it might be. In his travels in England he 
had seen many a similar stream embanked and puri- 
fied and thus made a joy and a delight. He could 
see our river thus cared for and urged it with voice 
and pen. 

Dr. Davis came to Pittsfield when it had a great 
deal of the old town about it. There still lingered 
much of the old-time idealism of the Puritan. It was 
an orderly town. God-fearing and law-abiding. A 
few men controlled and that wisely and with unself- 
ish purpose. Moreover there was much civic pride 
born of inherited traditions of loyalty and devotion 
to the place of one's birth or long-time adoption. Then 
began our commercial development, expanding popu- 
lation and inevitable change in ideals and loss of con- 



54 

trol by men of the type I have mentioned. Our newer 
citizenship was made up in a measure of a relatively 
unstable class, here in Pittsfield for a few years and 
then gone. They had no local family interests, — the 
old ideals and life were totally unknown, — in many 
cases the people came from communities totally unlike 
ours. They could not be expected to feel the same 
interest or preserve the old traditions. During Dr. 
Davis's service we changed from a steady, thrifty 
city of small population, with much of the old village 
life, to a bustling, modern, commercial community. 
With his sensitive, quick perception, he early felt these 
changes, some of which he feared meant a moral 
loss to the city. He was so responsive to all of our 
traditions of Puritan ancestry and teaching, so in- 
tensely spiritual in his thought, that he could not sit 
idly by. So he came to develop, to practice and to 
preach that community idealism which was so char- 
acteristic. Somehow even though the task were her- 
culean, he must gather under his influence all the 
strangers and newcomers. He must hold aloft the 
old standards of right living, thinking, being, and invite 
all men to join with him as soldiers of the Cross. 
Many people thought him impractical and said it is 
vastly more important to have our factories, our work- 
shops and our stores, to increase in population and be 
heralded as the growing city than to preserve old 
time worn Puritan notions. But are we quite sure 
that Dr. Davis did not have a keener, larger sense 
than most of us of the dangers of misguided, uncon- 
trolled growth of city life? That we have preserved 
so much of all that is good and true in our civic life 
and spirit is in no small measure due to his warning 
and guiding voice and pen. 



55 

He entered into our civic life again in his interest 
for the pubHc schools. His travels abroad had served 
to show him many mistakes, perhaps inevitable, in our 
public school system. In season and out he talked 
and wrote for the payment of more adequate salaries to 
our instructors and the raising of the standard. The 
German youth with his capacity for work, thorough- 
ness of preparation and insistence in application to his 
task was a model constantly held up to our view, nor 
did he fail to see the great points of advantage in the 
English schools. But time fails me to speak of all 
his interests in and labors for this city. I can but 
mention a few. Suffice it to say, his voice, his pen, 
his leadership was always for the upbuilding of a better 
community life. 

And I may now speak properly of another of Dr. 
Davis's visions which is personal for us, that of a 
new organ and an arrangement of the pulpit similar 
to the one where I now stand. To him this church 
building was sacred. It is built on living rock and 
the land on which it stands has never known private 
ownership. To him that living rock was Christ. He 
felt as have all true worshipers here the solemn dig- 
nity, the spiritual atmosphere, the uplifting beauty, 
yea the very presence of God in this house of wor- 
ship. Thus he would have made worship more holy 
with music, and house more beautiful with skilled 
workmanship and loving care. 

But his interest was not confined to his own church, 
nor did it content itself even with those of all other 
denominations in our city. He early found another 
problem which attracted his attention and gave to 
him much concern, that of our country churches. His 
fellow-laborers in the distant villages and on the moun- 
tain tops of our New England towns were to him 



56 

real heroes of the faith. Living and laboring for a 
miserable pittance in these lonely places where there 
is so much to discourage and so little to sustain and 
uplift the worker except his faith in God, these men 
excited his unbounded admiration. He was wont to 
refer to these co-workers as " our humble brethren," 
not in any sense of comparative greatness on his part 
but with profound respect for their devotion, self- 
sacrifice and faith. Many a word of kindly sympathy, 
many a gift of book or money went unheralded from 
him to these friends who so much needed encourage- 
ment and aid. His suggestion at some convention of a 
celibate clergy for the country church did not meet 
with ready favor but grew out of a profound knowl- 
edge of the harshness of conditions, the poverty of 
life, the sacrifice involved in the attempt to bring up 
a family upon the salary paid. It had a solid basis 
in good sense and justice and in any event served to 
sharply call attention to the intolerable conditions. He 
has gone, but the conditions which he so strongly felt 
and condemned remain. What better memorial to 
him, what finer tribute to his years of self-sacrificing 
labor, thought and prayer could this church build or 
pay than to establish a fund for the assistance of the 
struggling churches of this county? 

From our own standpoint and judged selfishly, we 
must not let religion die out and the name and worship 
of Christ be unknown in these our little settlements. 
Dr. Davis would rejoice to see this church become the 
great, wise, bountiful helper of these struggling 
churches. What individual grows except in selfishness 
who is self-centered and does nothing for his less for- 
tunate brothers? The church whose life runs clear 
and strong is that one which establishes and maintains 
missions where its workers and its money labor to- 



57 

gether for the upbuilding of God's Kingdom. What 
finer memorial then, what could be more in answer 
to his oft-repeated prayer, his yearning love for this 
church and these his friends and people than that the 
First Church of Christ in Pittsfield should forever 
mark this day by establishing its good-will fund for 
the assistance of the weaker churches of this County, 
that it should become like the Old South Church of 
Boston, the encouraging force and power working 
through these lesser agencies for the making of the 
people of these towns fit citizens of this region which 
so reflects the loving kindness of our common Father? 

But I must give my final estimate and appreciation. 
Before I do so, it will be fitting to speak this word. 

In his later years, there came into Dr. Davis's life 
a great sorrow, a sadness and a void which could 
not be filled. Shall we not pause for a moment to 
pay reverent tribute to her who in purest love, with 
true wifely devotion, sympathy and insight, for many 
years travelled the way of life in his company? In 
all the arts and graces of true womanhood, wifehood 
and motherhood, she was never lacking. Upon her 
he leaned, to her he came in his sorrows and dis- 
appointments ; after her going more and more did he 
dwell in those secret places of the Most High where 
he felt and believed he had spiritual communion with 
her, his well-beloved wife. His wounded heart found 
comfort in that phrase which he so often left to other 
stricken ones — "In His will is our peace." After 
this there entered into his life a true personal sym- 
pathy with all who mourned. He seemed so much 
more human, for he too had passed through the valley 
of the shadows ; he had fought the fight and come out 
conqueror. For him thereafter death had no sting 



58 

and the grave no victory and he could give this mes- 
sage to all with a knowledge which convinced. 

And so he lived and labored among us, giving, 
enriching, leading. Shall I be misunderstood if I 
say that he gave far more than was given to him, that 
this people was not always as kind, as responsive, as 
friendly as it might have been? 

He yearned for human sympathy and friendship 
with an almost unnatural yearning and the pathetic 
thing about it was that this very yearning repelled 
the sympathy and affection he craved. His heart 
and love went out in boundless measure to his people 
all through his service here and he never could under- 
stand just why he had their respect, their honor and 
their affection but not their intimate companionship ; 
and it is hard to explain this unless we ascribe it to 
a personality which was too idealistic, too intellectual 
and too refined, too, shall I say it, intensely earnest 
and grave, for ordinary daily companionship. 

Then too he was often misunderstood but that 
surely is not an offense or a characteristic to be criti- 
cised. Somewhere Emerson says : " Is it so bad then 
to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misundersood, 
and Socrates and Jesus and Luther and Copernicus 
and Galileo and Newton and every pure and wise 
spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be mis- 
understood." 

Carlyle voiced the same opinion when he said, "But 
great men are too often unknown, or what is worse, 
misknown." 

If he was misunderstood, it was because he dwelt 
on too lofty a plane, his thought in the higher realms 
and his spirit untouched by the common, coarse things 
of daily living. 



59 

But what an influence to have had in this church 
and community those long years! What was it for 
the youth of this church now its strength, its great 
strength in their young manhood and young woman- 
hood and their middle age, to have seen and heard 
and known this man! 

Can you not see him now in this place? See that 
tall, angular form, ungraceful but suggestive of 
power and strength. See that grave face, that finely 
shaped head " where dwelt a most busy mind," that 
countenance seamed with its furrows of care and deep 
thinking and yearning; and when he rises to speak, 
can you not hear those vigorous, rounded sentences 
clothing no mean repetitions of undeveloped ideas, 
feel the " thrill of new thoughts or old ones in the 
new form of individual inspiration " ? A power of 
highest order brought to us those strong messages of 
warning, of love, of encouragement, of hope. He saw 
with a clear eye the Christ Vision, — he knew what it 
was to have enthroned in men the Christ Master, — he 
knew the power of prayer, — he saw the dangers of this 
materialistic age, — he had studied history, — he could 
foresee the future, — he was filled with the spirit of 
service, — and he could not, would not rest until he 
had made his beloved people see and feel as did he. 
What influence that steady leadership exerted here, 
no man can tell or measure. Perhaps much of it was 
unknown to him and those whom he influenced, but 
to have the visions he had, to make his people see 
as he saw, and to always lead us bearing aloft that 
Christian ideal for seventeen years was an achievement 
the power and force of which no man can measure. 

He married many of us, he baptized our children, 
he received us and our children into this church and 



6o 

he buried our dead. We would be scarcely human 
did we not hold him in most kindly, loving, reverent 
memory. 

This church has had great men at its head. He 
was worthy to be of that circle of leaders. We do not 
know what the future has in store for this people or 
this church. We do not know what this city of ours 
may become in the years to follow, we do not know 
whether the traditions of the fathers will be the tradi- 
tions of the children, but this we do know: that the 
power and influence of Dr. Davis did not pass with 
his going but live on and that the people of this church 
and the children's children of this people shall rise up 
and call him blessed. "And when this cometh to pass 
(lo, it will come) then shall they know that a prophet 
hath been among them," 




y-nteyTLOr (>f ^^tn^it (^/lurc/i of (j/iri.>t- 

'J9I5 



THE POEM 



By Fannie Stearns Davis Gifford 



Shadow and sun on the high weather-vane; 
Whisper of snow, rustle of April rain; 
Clock hands that creep, inevitable, slow; 
Long ivy-leaves that sweep and shine and blow; 
Dark doors swung wide, — a golden dusk, — a sound 
Of serious organ-voices; — silence crowned 
With song and prayer and wonder. Year on year 
Slow Sabbaths find us still returning here. 

Up in the darkening rafters old dreams cling. 
Up in the skyward tower old bells sing. 
For all the swift new feet along the aisles, 
Old faces greet us with unshadowed smiles; 
Quaint shapes surprise us at the pew-heads. We 
Remember, and look forward, soberly. 

O House where God has showed His face of old! 
House that our Fathers founded, with the bold 
Sure homely faith we covet even now, — 
Gather us close! Unmurmuring we bow 
Beneath thy light and shadow. What are we 
Save little children, in thy mystery? 
Save little children, turning home to prove 
Once more the ancient miracle of Love? 



62 

For, though God walks among the hills to-night, 
Though the faint stars are His, and all the white 
Wild glory of the moon; though He may stir 
Deep in the heart of many a wanderer, 
Or throb in city streets, or flash His face 
From the mad turmoil of the market-place. 
Yet, in this House, whereon His seal was set. 
Shall He not draw us closer, closer yet? 
Shall He not touch our darkened eyes, that we 
For one true hour, may drop the scales, and see? 

See the strong Past, the stronger Future, when 
The ways of God shall grow more wide for men, — 
When mortal hands shall fold immortal fast. 
And Faith step free, as never in that Past? 

O House that God has loved, once more we prove 
The ancient joyful miracle of love. 
Almost from out that cloudy golden space 
Brightens the secret wonder of a Face : 
Echo on echo, heavenly-clear and proud, 
From outmost star, from earth-drawn cloud to cloud, 
Through waiting arch and rafter sweeps the Voice, 
"Lift up your hearts! O lift them high! Rejoice!" 



ADDRESSES AT THE PUBLIC 
MEETING SATURDAY EVENING 



In opening the meeting, the Pastor said: The 
first speaker whom we are to hear this evening 
is one to whom we are glad to hsten for many 
reasons. The name of WiUiams is connected with the 
early history of Pittsfield in several respects. You 
may remember that among the very first settlers in this 
neighborhood was a certain Colonel William Williams, 
not related so far as I know to Colonel Ephraim 
Williams who, I believe, founded by his bequest the 
free school which grew into Williams College; but 
Colonel William Williams did have the distinction of 
being the ninth person to unite with this church. He 
came next after the eight foundation men, and he 
was from the time of his settlement in Berkshire 
County one of the most important personages in the 
County north of Stockbridge, holding many civil 
offices and being a leader in the church as well as a 
leader in the state. He was an own cousin of Jonathan 
Edwards, and a nephew of Colonel John Stoddard, one 
of the three original grantees of this township. So 
that the name of Williams is one which has been 
familiar always in this town, and it is perpetuated by 
the name of one of our streets, as you know. 

There was another Williams, Mr. John Chandler 
Williams, who not only himself was well known as a 
citizen of Pittsfield, but whose wife became famous 
by saving the old elm in the year 1789, when they 



64 

were planning to build a new meeting house for the 
First Church and seemed to think for some reason 
that they must cut down the old elm. You will 
remember how Mrs. Williams is said to have placed 
herself and her apron between the wood choppers 
and the tree, and absolutely forced them to cease op- 
erations ; as a result of which her husband gave to 
the town land on the south side of the street in con- 
sideration of the church's giving an equal amount of 
land to the town on the north side. 

So there are these two Williams families with 
which we are associated in the early history of Pitts- 
field. But I fancy that we should all say that we are 
far prouder and think far oftener of our nearness 
to the College at Williamstown ; and there are many 
ways in which the close friendship between the church 
and the college has been renewed and kept up from 
generation to generation. A number of ministers of 
this town have been trustees of the College. Dr. Hum- 
phrey was a trustee, Dr. Bailey was a trustee, and Mr. 
Brinsmade also. Dr. Todd, in whose memory this 
pulpit stands here, and to whom this church owes so 
much, is remembered gratefully in Williams College, 
having been a trustee for twenty-seven years ; and as 
you may have noticed this afternoon, we acknowledged 
our obligation again to Williams College in the 
fact that the two gentlemen who spoke to us are both 
of them graduates of Williams College, and I presume 
that the two ladies who furnished the other contribu- 
tions to the afternoon's program would be graduates 
of Williams College if they had been able to be such. 

We are glad for these reasons and many more to 
welcome as our first speaker this evening the Presi- 
dent of Williams College, whom, though he has been 
in that high office not yet six years, we have already 



come to look up to and to admire as a sagacious admin- 
istrator, a leader of scholars, and a true maker of men : 
President Garfield. 



PRESIDENT GARFIELD'S ADDRESS 

When your pastor invited me to attend on this 
occasion and speak a few words of greeting from 
Williams College, I accepted with pleasure, the more 
so because Mr. Gregg informed me that I might, as I 
have done, drop off a train on the way from New 
York to Williamstown and deliver my message in- 
formally. 

Not only am I pleased to bring you a greeting 
from the College among the hills because of its re- 
lation to Pittsfield and to many connected with this 
church, but also because it gives me an opportunity 
to speak a word for myself. Because your minister 
has been good enough to say that I might speak quite 
informally, I venture to let memory lead the way. 
Thirty-two years ago, when I was a student in Wil- 
liams College, it was my privilege to attend this church 
while on a visit to Pittsfield of a Sunday. This place 
of worship, which has built itself so naturally and 
inevitably into your affections, is therefore associated 
with my first impressions of your delightful city and 
of the family who since that time have been my 
friends. When, after my college days, I had settled 
in Cleveland, I came to know and love the pastor 
of our church, Dr. Davis. He left us and came to 
this church and for many years served you as your 
pastor. 

During five delightful years in Princeton Univer- 
sity I was associated with and became affectionately 
fond of a descendant of your first pastor. Professor 



6S 

Allan Marquand and I frequently spoke of Pittsfield 
and of this church. It has given me great pleasure 
to meet one of his family here this evening, and to 
have brought back to my mind what I possibly should 
not have remembered, that the pastor and ancestor 
of whom Professor Marquand used to speak was your 
first minister. In a certain sense, therefore, I have 
a personal interest in this occasion as well as an 
official one. 

I assure you that Williams College does not forget 
that it is related in many vital ways to Pittsfield and 
Pittsfield's institutions. We are proud of the city 
to the south of us. It is a place of distinction and of 
peculiar charm. When we think of Berkshire County, 
Pittsfield inevitably comes to mind. Like the County, 
it possesses a quality better felt than described. Her 
church-going people are still thoroughly and typically 
New England. Religion and education are never far 
apart in their minds. Williams College serves the 
need on the side of higher education, supplementing 
the work of the churches. The College and the 
churches are the two great dynamic forces of the 
County; they are more than dynamic, they are living 
forces, inheritors of the best traditions of New Eng- 
land, and should never cease to stand side by side in 
the regard of her people. Secular and religious edu- 
cation must continue in the future as in the past to 
be fellow-workers, if citizenship is to be characterized 
by purity and high-mindedness. Western Massachu- 
setts still cherishes some of the old ideals of New 
England. We have departed from the standard of 
New England theocracy, and yet its influence is still 
felt, for here more than elsewhere we keep church 
and college always in view as closely related institu- 
tions. Our ideal is the trained mind actuated by the 



67 

dynamic of the spirit. We believe that the trained 
mind becomes a danger and a menace unless it is 
guided, inspired and held to a high character of work 
by that which the church seeks to contribute to us all. 
In conclusion, I beg to express the hope, as I en- 
tertain the belief, that throughout the years to come 
the relation between Williams College and this church 
and all the churches of Pittsfield, and of Berkshire 
County, will continue to be the relation of sister in- 
stitutions holding to the same high ideals, intent on 
the same great tasks, dedicated to the service that 
makes all institutions so dedicated great and noble. 



ADDRESS BY REV. HENRY GOODWIN SMITH 
ON REV. THOMAS ALLEN. 

Introducing the Rev. Henry G. Smith of Northamp- 
ton, the Pastor said: 

The next speaker this evening comes to us from 
the city of Northampton. The relations between 
Northampton and Pittsfield in the early days of this 
town were close and many. As I was saying a few 
moments ago, the first one of the three original 
grantees, in fact, the very first person to whom was 
granted by the General Court a part of this territory 
which is now Pittsfield was Colonel John Stoddard 
of Northampton; and as many of you know, Parson 
Allen came from Northampton. Four out of the eight 
of his foundation men came from Northampton : Aaron 
Baker and the three Phelpses, whose names you see 
on the shields. 

The first call which Thomas Allen received to the 
First Church in Pittsfield may not be remembered by 
you all, though it is given in Mr. Robert Adam's paper 
on "The Eight Foundation Men," read at the One 



68 

Hundred and Twenty-fifth Anniversary. He tells the 
story, which had come down in the Baker family, 
that when Mrs. Baker, Aaron Baker's wife, happened 
to be back in Northampton for a visit, she called 
upon Mrs. Allen, Thomas Allen's mother, and young 
Thomas not being very well she said to him, " Thomas, 
why don't you come up to Pittsfield and be our min- 
ister?" The church was then in the midst of its thirteen 
years of candidating for its first minister ; and in answer 
to that question, Mrs. Allen spoke for her son and said 
to Mrs. Baker, "Pittsfield ! why that's the end of the 
earth. H Thomas goes up there he'll fall ofif " Thomas 
came, however, as we know ; and not only did he avoid 
falling off, but he remained here for forty-six years ; 
and no doubt this is perhaps the greatest debt that 
Pittsfield owes to Northampton, — that Northampton 
gave to this parish and this town its first minister. 
Hence there is a peculiar appropriateness to-night in 
the privilege that we have of listening to one who 
is not only a native and a resident of Northampton, 
but is a direct descendant both of Thomas and of 
William Allen: Rev. Henry Goodwin Smith of the 
Second Church in Northampton, who now will 
address us. 

Mr. Smith said: 

I never was in this pulpit before; that is, in this 
incarnation. But this pulpit and this town seem 
strangely familiar. Is it because I have — pardon my 
speaking thus, I cannot otherwise — is it because I 
have within my veins eighty years of Pittsfield life, 
of the Colonial, the Continental, and the Constitutional 
eras? Is it because I claim fifty-three years of your 
first history? 

Mr. Gregg has kindly relieved me of my Northamp- 
ton introduction to my speech. Northampton sent the 



69 

aristocrat, John Stoddard, the magnificent, the "river 
god," who plotted out here his barony of twenty-four 
thousand acres. Northampton exiled to these western 
wastes her noblest and most famous son, before Berk- 
shire was Berkshire or Pittsfield was Pittsfield, John 
Stoddard's nephew, Jonathan Edwards, spiritual aris- 
tocrat. Northampton sent you her yeoman-born, Har- 
vard-bred, ardent young preacher of the Gospel of 
Christ, just at his majority, Thomas Allen, Spiritual 
Democrat, Thomas Allen, whom Catherine Sedgwick 
has called the "priest of the valiant heart, who served 
his people in the days of the oppression of the king." 
Thomas Allen, Professor Bliss Perry calls the " most 
picturesque figure in the history "of this American 
Piedmont ; Thomas Allen, William Cullen Bryant said 
stood alone, or almost alone, among the New England 
clergy of his day as a defender of Jefferson and of 
political democracy. 

Thomas Allen was the only one of the eight sons 
of his father and his famous mother, Betty Allen, 
who was named out of the New Testament. All the 
other seven were named from the Old Testament, 
and he ought to have been, too. He ought to have 
been Phineas or Joshua. Thomas was a misnomer, 
for no doubter was he, and there is no doubt about 
him. No man ever doubted his piety, no man ever 
doubted his patriotism, and no man ever doubted 
his politics. 

My old aunt, I believe his only living grand-child, 
the youngest daughter and only surviving child of 
President William Allen, sends her benison from her 
quiet chamber to her friends, to the descendants and 
posterity of the congregation and parish that loved her 
ancestor. She told me this little incident of the last 
years of Thomas Allen, related by some old resident 



70 

of Pittsfield. In his feebleness, one Sabbath he was 
in his high pulpit and below were spread the emblems 
of the communion meal. He became faint, and the 
deacons, the authorities of the church, rushed up to 
the pulpit to aid him, but his daughter-in-law, Mrs. 
Thomas Allen, Jr., who sat in the minister's pew, 
walked swiftly forward to the communion table, poured 
the wine from the chalice to the cup and carried it up 
— bold feminism of her day — to the pulpit, and " ad- 
ministered " the wine to the stricken man. Another 
incident is connected with Mrs. John Chandler 
Williams who has been already mentioned here 
to-night. The story runs that one day young Tommy 
Allen was seen in the street by his father's house 
horse-whipping one of his father's opponents, possibly 
a parishioner also, and Mrs. Williams looked from 
her house across the square and saw the transaction. 
Being an ardent defender of her pastor, seeing that 
the whip was becoming useless from excessive use, 
she brought him out a new horse whip, crying, " Lay 
on ! Tommy, lay on ! " Old Thomas Allen, the father, 
came from out his parish house, and saw the situation, 
and mildly remarked, " Forbear ! my son, forbear ! " 
Young Thomas looked at his father and he looked at 
the lady; chivalry overcame filial obedience, and he 
obeyed the lady. I should like to leave this problem 
of ethics to the Bible class of the First Church. Did 
young Tommy obey the fifth commandment and honor 
his father, or did he not? There is just as much to 
be said for one side as the other. 

Genealogy is a remarkably interesting game. You 
can get out of it just what you want. I sat down 
the other day with a lead pencil and multiplication 
table, and my first discovery was this : — that I had eight 
great grand-parents, four of them men, and four of 



71 

them women. That's no novel situation. You have 
eight great grand-parents, and so has everybody. Adam 
had; no, Adam did not, but the multipHcation table 
will upset the best system of theology. Of these eight 
great grand-parents, I find Thomas Allen a very highly 
satisfactory one to hark back to. He was all that a 
great grand-parent ought to be. He was picturesque. 
He was positive. He was prophetic. 

I am not here to speak for the whole Allen gen- 
ealogy. I would refer you to that volume entitled 
" The Descendants of Elder John Strong, of North- 
ampton," but William Allen, his son, my grandfather, 
was a man of distinctly different type. In his day an 
apostle of peace as his father was the advocate of 
war, he was the leader of the American represent- 
atives to the great international peace conference held 
at Versailles in 1849. I hold in my hand a little 
testament that any doubting Thomas may examine 
afterwards, presented to the American delegates of 
the peace society by the English delegates, and signed 
by the honorable name of Richard Cobden. 

William Allen followed his father in the pastorate 
of the Pittsfield church. He left this place and 
succeeded his father-in-law, John Wheelock, in the 
presidency of Dartmouth College. Dartmouth College 
was a fresh-water college, — always has been, — but just 
then it was a hot-water college in the days of the 
famous " case," and William Allen soon left the 
situation and went to Brunswick and Bowdoin College 
where he lived for twenty years, and then returned 
and spent his last thirty years in Northampton. So 
you see Northampton gave you Thomas Allen and 
took again William Allen. You have Thomas Allen 
coming, but we have William Allen going. 



72 

Of the descendants of William Allen, I am here to 
speak for one daughter living. The full genealogical 
roster has worked out differently every time I have 
tried it. There are, I believe, nine grandchildren 
living, five of them Aliens. The name of Allen dies 
out with my generation, the fourth from Thomas in 
the line of William. Fifteen, I think it's fifteen or 
sixteen, fifteen great grandchildren, and fifteen great 
great grandchildren of Thomas Allen now living, two 
of them living in Williamstown, some of them in Cuba, 
some of them in Kansas City, Worcester, Amherst 
and elsewhere, all up-to-date twentieth century 
children, vigorously practicing eugenics. I presume 
it's the way with all the other great grandchildren of 
Thomas Allen, the fighting parson of White Plains, 
Ticonderoga, and of Bennington. 

Thomas Allen left five heirlooms, and I want you 
to go into executive session this evening as executors 
and help me in the disposal of these five treasures. 

Item I. Two large, cut-glass, crystal decanters, 
assimilated by the fighting parson at the battle of 
Bennington from a Hessian surgeon. Where are 
those cut-glass decanters? I should be willing to 
exchange them for some valuable manuscript, which 
I have here and which I wish to present to the church 
a few moments later. 

Item 2. A valuable parcel of real estate situated 
in or about the center of the town of Pittsfield. I 
believe your residents are familiar with its location and 
its later fortunes. 

Item 3. A collection of manuscript of Thomas 
Allen's sermons, addresses, political editorials, etc. 
As to the sermons, they say there were two thousand 
seven hundred of them written in shorthand. That 
was a very shrewd thing for a clergyman of that day 



n 

to do who wished to be thoroughly up-to-date and 
preserve to remote posterity his reputation for ortho- 
doxy. I have here also with these sermons a paper 
on Federalism. Here it is. It looks cool, but it's siz- 
zling from top to bottom, from center to circumfer- 
ence. I wish to present these papers in the name of 
the living descendants of William Allen to the church 
at Pittsfield. You know what to do with them better 
than any one else may. I fancy that there are among 
them facts which have not yet been covered in your 
written history. Certainly this remarkable paper on 
Federalism I have never seen quoted. Possibly you 
knew about it and never desired to quote it, but you 
are going to hear a little of it to-night before you get 
through, and I think a good deal of it is going to 
appear in the Springfield Republican before this cele- 
bration is concluded. 

Item 4. A sample of old-fashioned, genuine New 
England piety. A reason, and it's not modesty either, 
forbids my saying just where this has gone to or 
disappeared to, but I fancy that my old Northampton 
aunt, his only surviving grand-daughter, might rightly 
claim, while she would never claim it for herself, if 
not the monopoly, at least all the available assets of 
this particular portion of his heirlooms. 

Item 5. A brand of red-hot, Jeffersonian Dem- 
ocracy. Where did Thomas Allen come by his radical 
politics? How did it come that the New England 
parson, the person of the community, naturally allied 
to the well-to-do and the aristocrats of the community, 
with his theology supporting his most strenuous claims 
to supremacy over the non-elect, with every instinct of 
self-preservation, of theology, of tradition, and of 
social intercourse, that would ally him with the 
Federals, how came it about that Thomas Allen 



74 

through his generation stood here unflinchingly the 
advocate of the ideaHsm of the French Revolution and 
of Jeffersonianism ? You may explain it possibly 
through the cropping out of original sin. I would 
prefer to regard it as the direct inspiration of the 
Almighty. I explain it thus. The man whose heart 
was fused and fixed in the principles of the Declaration 
of Independence was unchanged through his genera- 
tion. In the ebb tide and the compromise and the 
practical opportunism of his day, he held his absolute 
devotion to the principle upon which the nation was 
founded, which was pure democracy. I take it that 
the message of his day was that of a political prophet, 
which is just as essentially the message of our own 
day. Thomas Allen was a Lincoln republican. Well, 
that means nothing. Taft and Roosevelt and Wilson, 
Mark Hanna, and the Springfield Republican are all 
Lincoln republicans. That means American. But 
Thomas Allen znfas a Lincoln republican, and in his 
heart burned unquenchably the belief that the Federal- 
ism of his day — whether he was right or wrong isn't 
to the point, he believed it, — that the Federalism of 
his day was a compromise with aristocracy and with 
monarchy; that the two logical forms are an out and 
out monarchy, and a democracy based upon the equal 
rights of all men, and this is the reason of his fervor, 
and the fury of his utterances. Federalism to him 
meant the little clique of aristocrats of the village or 
the State who claimed for themselves the authority and 
the power to administer the affairs of government for 
others. That was his belief, and in that belief he split 
your church in two. Was he right or wrong, politi- 
cally? I do not know any more than you do, but I 
believe that for this generation and for the next the 
attitude of Thomas Allen toward the State, and toward 



75 

the social and the political aspect of the Kingdom of 
God are greatly needed. 

Enough for politics. My last word to you is this : 
In that plain old meeting house on an April day in the 
last years of the eighteenth century, Thomas Allen 
stood before his congregation and preached the funeral 
sermon of his beloved daughter, Mrs. White, who had 
died in London a few months before. Would that I 
could quote it either literally or in spirit ! He showed 
the soul of that exiled child of his, uttering her last 
farewell, speaking her words of courage to her own 
father who was then bowed breaking under the 
burdens of his controversy, speaking her farewell to 
her friends, and to her family ; and then in conclusion 
he turns and speaks to her, a wondrous message from 
his own breaking father's heart, as he calls upon the 
angels to defend her, the Christ above to accept her, 
and the heavens to receive her spirit. So, after all the 
turmoil of politics, I would leave that last impression 
of the faithful parish priest, who baptized and married 
and buried the generations of this community, and who 
stood through all his days as the parson or the "person" 
of his parish. 



ADDRESS BY HENRY M. HUMPHREY, ESQ., 
ON DR. HEMAN HUMPHREY 

Introducing Mr. Henry M. Humphrey, the Pastor 
said: 

The First Church in Pittsfield has many reasons 
to be grateful to Thomas Allen, and she is glad to have 
reason to thank this descendant of his not only for 
coming to us to bring this inspiring message, but also 
for giving to us these treasures of his, which now are 



1^ 

to be ours, and shall ever be valued and prized. We 
thank him most heartily for his kindness and his 
generosity. 

You heard this afternoon the beautiful tribute 
which Dr. Jenkins, in his address twenty-five years 
ago, paid to Dr. Heman Humphrey. With his words, 
we shall do well to remember a sentence at least of that 
which Dr. Todd has said of him, in his historical 
sermon preached in 1873. Dr. Todd said of 
Dr. Heman Humphrey, " He had more sanctified 
common sense than any man I ever met." A great deal 
there was in those plain words. We are fortunate and 
honored to-night in having with us a grandson of 
Heman Humphrey, Mr. Henry M. Humphrey, of New 
York, who now is to speak to us. 



Mr. Humphrey said: 

It is fifty-three years since Heman Humphrey died. 
It was fifty-three years previous to that time that 
he married Sophia Porter and settled in Fairfield, his 
first pastorate, from which he came to Pittsfield in 
1817. Prof. David Swing said: "The block of time 
called fifty years is made more significant when they are 
formative years. To measure the value of moral 
influences one cannot call in as witnesses a few hours 
or days. At the end of a half century we may all 
venture to give an opinion for or against the applicant 
for remembrance." Heman Humphrey's block of fifty- 
three years were largely formative and sometimes sur- 
prisingly prophetic. About ninety years ago came his 
farewell address to the first missionaries of "the 
American Board" to the Sandwich Islands, now a part 
of the United States. Later an address on "Slavery"; 
ended in the United States soon after his death. 



11 

From 1832 to 1834 Choctaw and Cherokee Indians 
were forced by the State of Georgia to emigrate, 
despite United States treaties and wonderful progress 
in civilization made by those Indians. It was a com- 
pleted defiance of the United States by a single State 
and an absolute nullification of United States treaties 
by the State of Georgia. His publishers state that Dr. 
Humphrey was the first who uttered remonstrances 
from the pulpit against Indian oppression. In 1829 Dr. 
Humphrey took up the cause of the Choctaws and 
Cherokees and delivered an address at Amherst, Hart- 
ford and other places, on "Indian Rights and Our 
Duties." I give extracts from that address. 

"Shall I be told that 'all this is idle preaching' and 
that I have entirely mistaken the policy of Georgia in 
reference to the Cherokees — that she has no thought 
of compelling them to emigrate. I am astonished that 
such an expedient should be resorted to, to quiet the 
friends of the Indians and ward off public remon- 
strance. It is an insult offered to the common sense 
of the nation. What? Tell the Indians 'We want 
your country and you had better leave it — you can 
never be quiet and happy here ?' and then because they 
do not take your advice, cut it up into counties, declare 
all their laws and usages, after a certain day, to be 
null and void, and substitute laws, which it is known 
they cannot live under ; and then turn round and coolly 
tell the world, 'Oh, we mean no compulsion. The 
farthest in the world from it! If these choose to stay 
why by all means let them remain where they are.' 

"These are the tender mercies of which we shall 
undoubtedly learn more in due time. 

"It amounts to this : 'You have got a fine farm and 
I want it. It makes a notch in the corner of mine. I 
will help you to move five hundred miles into the 



78 

wilderness and there give you more and better land 
which you can cultivate and enjoy 'as long as grass 
grows and water runs' (these last words in quotation 
marks and Dr. Humphrey's foot-note, " Query, How 
long does water run in the region destined for the 
future residence of the Indians?"). 'You must go: 
however do just as you please. I shall never resort to 
any other compulsion, than just to lay you under 
certain necessary restrictions. Perhaps, for instance, 
as I am the strongest and you have more land than 
you want, I may take two-thirds or three-fourths of it 
from you ; but then there shall be no compulsion ! Stay 
upon what is left if you choose. I may also find it 
necessary to ask you for your house, and if you should 
not give it up. I may be driven to the necessity of 
chaining you to a ring bolt and giving you a few salu- 
tary stripes — not to compel you to flee from your 
habitation, the moment you can get loose (for com- 
pulsion of all things I abhor) but just to induce you to 
emigrate willingly.' 

"I maintain then, that it is the bounden duty of the 
General Government to protect the Indians, not only 
in the enjoyment of their country but of their laws. If 
it is possible for treaties to bind a nation in any case, 
then are we bound. If there is any such thing as public 
faith then is ours solemnly pledged to a single tribe, 
nearly twenty times over. If that pile of Indian 
treaties, now in the office of State, is anything more 
than a pile of frauds and insults, then the Government 
must interpose its strong arm to prevent aggression." 

He was only about two years ahead of his time in all 
this. 

He virtually concludes with: 

"If such encroachments acquiesced in, do not pre- 
pare the way for putting shackles upon our children, 



79 

they must be protected by higher munitions than con- 
stitutional bulwarks. This I am willing to leave upon 
record and run the risk of being laughed at for fifty 
years hence." He lived just long enough to see those 
whose names are on yonder monument shoulder the 
"higher munitions" for the preservation of the Union, 
thirty-two years after his prophecy. 

He delivered the second annual address of the 
"American Sunday School Union." 

His address against "Duelling" created a sensation. 
If I did not frequently pass the tomb of Alexander 
Hamilton I would not realize that such a code ever 
existed in the United States. 

Along with these are his books and pamphlets and 
newspaper articles on issues and interests of Church, 
State, County, Town and personalities. 

Foreign Missions have widened marvelously and 
yet from his " Letters to a Son in the Ministry," 
published in 1842, I sent two pages to the Presbyterian 
Board of Foreign Missions and they thought them 
enough of a "forward movement" more than forty 
years after they were published, to copy and send at 
once to fifteen thousand ministers. 

A speaker in 191 1, not 181 1, referred to the 
Amherst Collegiate Institute with the remarks "When 
Dr. Humphrey assumed the headship of this callow 
school the difficulties which beset the task seemed 
insurmountable. Many people were opposed to the 
founding and endowment of a new College in Massa- 
chusetts — was not Harvard sufficient?" 

A few years ago I handed that Collegiate Institu- 
tion inaugural to a college president whom I believe 
second to none in his knowledge of the college curri- 
cula of Europe and the United States. He returned it 



8o 

to me with "Do you know that President EHot of Har- 
vard has only just come to Dr. Humphrey's 1823 in- 
augural point of view?" 

President William T. Foster wrote "The Admini- 
stration of the College Curriculum" which when issued 
about three years ago by Houghton, Mifflin & Co., 
was welcomed for its thoroughness and up-to-dateness. 
One reviewer writes : "Harvard alone has upon her 
records the story of a half-century of elective studies. 
Some interesting and little known facts are 
recorded, notably the importance of several smaller 
colleges as pioneers of the elective system. Bowdoin 
and the University of Virginia were abreast with 
Harvard in taking about the year 1825, certain clear 
steps toward the broadening of the curriculum. At 
the same time Amherst went still further. In 1826 the 
Amherst faculty presented to the Governing Boards 
what President Foster does not hesitate to call 'an in- 
spired report' advocating a radical adoption of the 
elective method." President Foster says further 
"The report is an extraordinary document, at least 
half a century ahead of its time." This report 
of the Amherst faculty is two in one, the first part 
August 21, 1826, and the second December 5, 
1826, signed "in behalf of the Faculty, H. Hum- 
phrey, Amherst College." One needs to read the 
whole report to realize its initiative, virility and 
also guarded quality. The President of the callow 
school of October, 1823, had by December, 1826, three 
years, begun to set the pace for the twentieth century, 
but none could be less conscious of its reach, except that 
in a sense, he profoundly believed in the eternal prin- 
ciples underlying all that he attempted. 

On Easter morning in April, 191 1, two handsome 
Tiffany windows were unveiled in the First Congre- 



8i 

gational Church of Fairfield, the gift of Mr. Saltus, in 
memory of Rev. Noah Hobart and Rev. Heman Hum- 
phrey, both former pastors. The address of Dr. Child 
on the life and work of Dr. Humphrey was masterly 
and is printed in full in the Bridgeport Standard of 
April 17, 191 1. Dr. Child draws from the well known 
incidents and writings of Dr. Humphrey's life, but 
interweaves them with references to the formative 
years of Mr. Humphrey's pastorate in Fairfield and 
local continuing influence since. 

To bring references to him down to this hundred 
and fiftieth anniversary week, I quote from The New 
York Times Book Review of last Sunday. A sub- 
scriber writes asking the value of "a copy of the 'New 
England Primer' with introduction by the Rev. Dr. H. 
Humphrey, President of Amherst College, printed in 
Worcester, and containing all the usual features of the 
earlier editions, also the 'Dialogue Between Christ, a 
Youth, and the Devil.' I know from the introduction 
that it was printed after 1823, but it is undated." 

How do I, sixty-seven years his junior, remember 
him as he seemed to me at home in Pittsfield? I was 
present at the golden wedding; heard Dr. Todd and 
others speak, but remember little that was said except 
as I read their words later in life. I remember Dr. 
Humphrey as he looked at family prayers, preaching 
and in the daily round. I remember the squirrels in the 
great tree that was rooted partly in the Humphrey lot, 
partly in Mrs. O'Sullivan's and considerably in the 
East Street sidewalk. Also the little pile of stones just 
outside the porch door of his study, ready to use on 
squirrel-chasing dogs. I knew that he was working to 
have the town lots kept for Pittsfield boys free baseball 



82 

grounds instead of being leased to circuses, and I tried 
to make him admit that he wrote the articles in the 
Eagle signed "An Old Baseball Player." 

I remember that we "kept" Saturday after sun- 
down, and our football was placed for a rush with the 
last departing ray of Sunday and that our rush was 
sometimes premature, the result of a cloud or the like. 
As one of my cousins said "unkeeping" Sunday night 
was "like having an orange when you haven't had any- 
thing to eat all day." I remember Robert Pomeroy 
vividly as one of those who dropped in to help 
"unkeep" in quiet, friendly, cordial chat with Dr. 
Humphrey. 

At that time prize fights, national and international, 
were held at "Chatham Four Corners," where the 
states meet and make quick transit from interruption 
easy. After the fight the principals and admirers would 
come to Pittsfield, to the old "Berkshire," and take the 
chances of being arrested by Sheriff Willis. Dr. Hum- 
phrey hated the demoralization of all the fights and 
the brutality of most of them, and was ready to give 
the law any moral or other required support, to sup- 
press them. One night after a big fight. Dr. Humphrey 
said at the supper table, "The train was late at Rich- 
mond and I had nothing to do but read the account of 
that terrible prize fight." How we boys chuckled, when 
by ourselves. "Grandfather reading that fight ! he liked 
it all right." No doubt we thought of it when he put 
the emphasis into such athletic metaphors of St. Paul 
as "So fight I, not as one that beateth the air." 

Long before that he taught college students the 
value of a training which could make sinews and 
muscles like steel and hair as soft as an otter's fur, 
but his training took the direction of farm work, walk- 
ing, running and ball games rather than boxing. Am- 



83 

herst was one of the first, probably the first college to 
take up athletics as training for the occupations of 
adult life. 

A scrap book of Dr. Humphrey's writings in news- 
paper clippings has recently come into my possession. 
A few of them would in parts be called "preachy" or 
"pretty pious" but even that ministerial style of his 
time is full of his robust, original quality. I quote 
from his article in the "Culturist and Gazette" signed 
"East Street," of which the topic is "Shade Trees and 
Sidewalks." 

"Without eulogizing this fast age in all of its enter- 
prises it seems to me we are not fast enough in beauti- 
fying our rapidly growing village when it can be done 
with so little expense. Our sidewalks are not near wide 
enough, and none of them are properly graded. On all 
our thoroughfares near the centre of our village, they 
ought to be at least eighteen or twenty feet wide. On 
North, South, East and West Streets, taking ofif twenty 
feet on each side would leave seventy-five feet for the 
travelled road. Now is the time to make sidewalks for 
future generations as well as ourselves. Very few vil- 
lages have so fine a soil or smooth and cheap sidewalks 
as Pittsfield. Instead of the clay which requires flagg- 
ing throughout, we have the fine gravel that when 
trodden, becomes almost as hard as a pavement and as 
dry in a few hours after a rain. Shall we have the 
trees, which might cost twenty-five cents apiece, set out 
and warranted for tw^o years ? Shall we carry out these 
and other improvements to beautify the village, attract 
the notice of strangers and induce gentlemen of sub- 
stance and character to come and settle among us ?" 

During the Civil War a Northern woman said, 
"But Mr. Lincoln, you think God is on our side, don't 
you?" The President replied: "Madam, I hope that 



84 

we are on God's side." Heman Humphrey's absorbing 
idea was to get God's point of view in every particular 
matter, as he came to it. He delighted in search for the 
mind of God in nature and human nature as well as in 
the Scripures. That is the way he attained the sanctified 
common sense that Dr. Todd said he had sent around 
the world for fifty years. 

We would not go home till morning if I quoted 
and expressed my appreciation of what his brethren 
have said of him. It makes one humble to read Dr. 
Todd's address at the golden wedding of Dr. and Mrs. 
Humphrey and his funeral sermon on Dr. Humphrey. 
The heart and capacity to write such tributes is akin 
to rightfully winning them. Could any man have 
really deserved such loving, honest appreciation of 
his friends? They were as much to him as he was to 
them. It was the mutual capacity for all that is best 
that made friend, pastor, men, women and children of 
Pittsfield so much to each other ; and they molded each 
other in developing that capacity. 



GENERAL MORRIS SCHAFF'S ADDRESS 

Introducing General S chaff , the Pastor said: 

Many of you will remember the Poem of the One 
Hundred and Twenty-fifth Anniversary of this 
Church, entitled "A Prayer for Church and Town." 
We are honored and fortunate in having the author of 
that poem here to-night. This celebration would not 
have been complete without him. We all are glad now 
to listen to him. General Schaff. 

General S chaff said: 

I think I should feel more at ease if I were not up 
in this pulpit. [General S chaff then descended to the 
floor of the church]. 



8s 

Surely, my friends, it is a great pleasure for me to 
meet with you once more, yet that pleasure is marred 
a bit by a reference to some lines I wrote, for, as you 
know, the man in a community who has the least 
weight is the fellow that tries to write poetry. But let 
all this be as it may, it was my fortune to be here at 
the One Hundred and Twenty-fifth Anniversary of this 
venerable Church. It had then at its head Jonathan L. 
Jenkins, and it seems fitting and proper that at the very 
outset I should say a word about him ; for besides being 
the best preacher I ever heard, one of the most sug- 
gestive talkers I ever met and one of the most con- 
genial companions that ever graced a table or a hearth, 
he was a very dear and steadfast friend. I need not 
recall to you who remember him his distinctively 
aristocratic personality, those flaming dark eyes, or 
that voice that rose and fell through all the compass 
of feeling. No, like all men of genius, he left his mark. 
Jenkins ! friend of other days ! we are here celebrating 
the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of your old 
church. Tender are our memories. You are not for- 
gotten, and your old congregation wafts a greeting to 
you on that other shore. 

Of all the elements in our being the spiritual is 
altogether the most vital and potent. The mystery of 
life, time and space, each in its way so vastly deep, 
impenetrable and immeasurable, yet and notwith- 
standing, under the realms of the spiritual they lie 
comprehensible and passive, passive as the fields under 
the sunlight. And as the sunlight warms and converts 
the soil of the fields into living form and being, clothed 
in strength and beauty, so up out of the soil of the 
heart the spiritual in man through creative feeling 
brings aspirations which from time to time bloom with 
visions, visions that penetrate life's mystery and then, 



86 

leaping time and space, carry us into the presence of 
the infinite, the beneficent presence of God himself; 
and only ceases its efliorts when it has revealed a beau- 
tiful land — a reward for the righteous, a consolation 
for the weary and the tear-shedding poor. 

No, friends, I am not trying to preach, but religion 
is not a figure of speech. It is a reality ; it is a living 
thing; it is a valid, heaven-inspired, solemn truth, and 
its dwelling place is the heart of man. 

If, to use the language of the Bible, we apply our 
hearts unto wisdom and turn from this rather blazing 
fireside of poetry to that of cold reason, it takes but a 
moment for us to discover that this old church of 
Pittsfield is an embodiment, as this church and all 
churches have been, of man's instinctive aspirations, 
and on those instinctive aspirations alone the founda- 
tions of all government and progress rest. Now, if 
this be a truth, and I believe it to be a very profound 
one, don't let us make any mistakes. Although you 
are proud of your mammoth General Electric plant, 
your banks, and your world-famous mills, yet they in 
themselves do not suggest justice, charity, or magnan- 
imity, the characteristics and the life blood of modern 
civilization, for they are essentially of and belong to 
the kingdom of mammon, while this church belongs 
to that other kingdom, the kingdom that is referred to 
in the Lord's Prayer by the Nazarene, that wisest 
counsellor and statesman, that best friend of the poor 
and heavy-laden, he who first opened the door to the 
hope of immortality, moreover the first and best gen- 
tleman that the world has ever seen. 

Look, then, at this church from any point of view, 
worldly, social or spiritual, and you cannot help but see 
and feel what it is and what it must have been to the 
intellectual life of Pittsfield. In years it dates back to 



87 

1764, the very dawn of the era of the greatest event 
that the world has seen since Luther's time. The voice 
of the ages spoke to its founders and out on the fields 
of the Revolution they fell for that new-born country. 
Their sons, leaders in state and town, by their courage 
and high standards of civic life, have given a pride to 
Pittsfield and to every man that hails from Berkshire. 

Oh, Pittsfield friends of that kind and class of my 
own day — yes. of my own day — who worshipped here ! 
At the very thought of them that door opens and here 
they come marching down the aisle again. Here come 
the Colts, the Warriners, the Barkers, the Russells. 
I am afraid I shall forget some of those names — down 
the aisle they come. Robert Adam, Pingree, Dawes, 
Edward Learned, Ensign Kellogg, Taft, the Redfields, 
Plunketts, the Wests, Paddock and Hull, here they 
come. And last, but not least, here comes, too, my 
dear friend, the war-tried, gallant Joseph Tucker. 
Heavy and wooden is his labored tread, for you know 
he lost a leg at Port Hudson : a kindlier face, a warmer 
heart, never adorned a pew or a judicial bench than 
that of Judge Joseph Tucker. Hail, hail, I say to you, 
Tucker and all of those friends of my youth, all hail! 

And O, old bell, in this steeple, I have heard you 
clang this town's and this nation's joy, I have heard 
you toll the town's and the nation's sorrow, and I have 
heard your tones die away over these leaning meadows 
and over these laurel-blooming and sky-propping hills. 
Ring on ! ring on in the days to come as you have rung 
to me in the days that have gone by ! Ring on, calling 
us all to upright lives, to be generous and kind to one 
another, and inspire us to lead our town, and above all, 
our country in the path of righteousness, for righteous- 
ness exalteth a nation. God bless this old church this 
day and every day on to the end. 



88 

In closing the meeting, the Pastor said: 

I am sure that we must have felt that the words 
to which we have Hstened, especially those which have 
been spoken by the last of the friends who have ad- 
dressed us here, have been truly more appropriate to 
this church and this room than they could have been 
appropriate to the gathering about our supper tables; 
and that we must go from this meeting with a new 
sense of the sacredness of the Church of Christ, of 
every church of Christ, of this church of Christ in so 
far as it is a true church. We are able to realize, all 
of us, a little more clearly than we have before, what 
it means in a community to have had for one hundred 
and fifty years consecrated Christian men and women 
wisely and faithfully led and served, and to have their 
children's children following in their footsteps, doing 
God's work in their own town. We have not begun to 
honor them all to-day. We have spoken but a few of 
the names ; we have told but a few of the noble words 
and deeds ; but enough has been said to make us re- 
member more constantly, more conscientiously, I trust, 
our own duty to the church, to the community, to God, 
in the days that are just to come. May God's blessing 
go with us all from this meeting. 



THE SUNDAY MORNING SERVICE 



OPENING SENTENCE 

"I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence 
Cometh my help. My help cometh from the Lord, which 
made heaven and earth." (Ps. 121 :i,2). 

INVOCATION 

God of our fathers, we their children lift up our 
hearts unto Thee in thankfulness, in faith, in hope, 
in love. Thou hast been mindful of us in the days 
that are past. We beseech Thee to bless us in the 
days that are to come ; and above all to make and 
keep us ever mindful of Thee. We ask it in the 
name of Christ our Saviour. 

PRAYER BY DR. CALKINS 

Almighty God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 
Who hast promised that whensoever Thy people meet 
together in prayer Thou wilt be present to bless them, 
and hast taught Thy faithful people that they should 
not forsake the assembling of themselves together, but 
that in every place where prayer is wont to be made 
there art Thou : Hear, we beseech Thee, the prayers 
and supplications of Thy people here present, and 
grant us, O Lord, our God, all things that are needful 
for this our present life and for our everlasting sal- 
vation. Hear our prayers of thanksgiving and of 
praise, O Lord, our God, for all that Thou hast done 



90 

for us Thy children from the beginning of our Hves 
and even to this hour. We do bless Thee for the 
beauty of the world which Thou hast made, for the 
succession of day and night, summer and winter, seed- 
time and harvest, and that Thou hast not left Thy- 
self without a witness in the world which Thou hast 
made. We do bless Thee for all those blessings tem- 
poral and spiritual which we have continually received 
at Thy hands, for food and for raiment, and all the 
comforts and conveniences of this life; but O Lord, 
our God, above all else, for Thy unfathomable love 
in that unspeakable gift of Thy son, our Lord and 
Saviour Jesus Christ, who is our only means of grace, 
who is our only hope of glory. We do bless Thee 
that when Thou didst deliver him up for our offences 
Thou didst raise him again for our justification, by 
whose resurrection from the dead we have hope of 
everlasting life. For all the promises of Thy Holy 
Word, for all the comforts of our most holy faith, 
for our Christian baptism, instruction, upbringing, for 
those our parents, teachers, friends, who have com- 
municated unto us their faith and have given unto us 
the imperishable possessions of our lives, we offer 
our thanks and our prayers of gratitude and of praise. 
And O Lord, for Thy church that Thou hast placed in 
this world we do bless Thee. For the saints, apostles, 
prophets and martyrs who in every day and gener- 
ation have witnessed to Thy unchanging and un- 
dying truth, into the welcome and reward of whose 
labors we ourselves are entered, we thank Thee. Es- 
pecially we bless Thee for this church that Thou hast 
planted in this place, which Thou hast watched over 
by Thy holy spirit, guided by Thy presence and com- 
forted with Thy truth. We bless Thee for all those 
Thy servants who here from year to year and from 



91 

generation to generation have broken the bread of 
life to those who have worshipped here, and have in- 
structed them out of Thy Holy Word: who have 
been true shepherds to the flock and have given us 
an ensample of a godly, holy life. We ask Thy bless- 
ing upon Thy servant who now ministers to this peo- 
ple. We pray Thee that he may be enriched by Thy 
spirit, comforted by Thy grace; above all that his 
may be such purity of life that he may adorn the 
doctrine that he teaches, that he may rightly and duly 
administer Thy holy sacraments and lead this Thy 
people into the fullness of Thy truth and the glory 
of Thy life. We bless Thee for all those Thy servants 
who, having witnessed here a good confession, have 
now fallen on sleep and are gathered unto their fath- 
ers ; and we beseech Thee that a double portion of 
their spirit may rest upon us Thy children and upon 
our children's children, that we may imitate the ex- 
ample of their patience, and at last may enter into 
the joy of their resurrection. And now hear the 
prayers, we beseech Thee, of this people gathered in 
this Thy house. Thou, O Lord, dost know what are 
the deepest needs and desires of our hearts; Thou 
canst answer them every one. Hear the prayer of 
the penitent, O Lord, our God, that he may feel his 
sin to be forgiven, that he may feel himself to be 
washed and to be clean, to have a new heart and a 
right spirit given unto him, that henceforth he may 
obey the commandments and walk in the way of Thy 
truth. Hear the prayers of those who are tempted, and 
who feel themselves to be assailed by sins well known to 
themselves and to Thee. Help them, we pray Thee, to 
put on the helmet of salvation which is the word of 
God and to come off conquerors through Him who 
loved us and who gave Himself for us. Hear the 



92 

prayers, O Lord, our God, of those who are conscious 
of some burden not known unto others, but well known 
to themselves and to Thee. Help them to lay their bur- 
den at Jesus' feet. Give them strength, O Lord, our God, 
to take it up again in memory of Him who bore the 
cross for us on Calvary, and to endure to the end with 
joy unspeakable and full of glory. And Lord, hear 
our prayers, we beseech Thee, for all sorts and con- 
ditions of men. We pray for those who know nothing 
of the story of Jesus and His love. Hasten the day, 
we beseech Thee, when the whole world shall be cov- 
ered with the knowledge of God as the waters cover 
the sea; and grant that this Thy church may be a 
light that is set on a hill, whose out-goings shall be 
to the ends of the earth. Hear our prayers for those 
our friends, our neighbors, members of our families, 
present or absent, whose names we now mention in our 
hearts in silent prayer before Thee. Bless, O Lord, 
our God, those that are sick of body, and if it be Thy 
will restore them to health and to strength, or else 
dispose their souls to Thy salvation. Hear our prayers 
for all travellers by land and by sea. Protect them in 
all dangers to which they may be exposed, and bring 
them at last to their homes in peace. Hear our prayers 
for young men and young women absent from their 
homes. Keep them, O Lord, in Thy faith and fear. 
Confirm and strengthen them in every good and holy 
resolution, that they may offer up themselves to be 
a living and a holy sacrifice in Thy sight. And O Lord, 
our God, hear us as we pray each for all and all for 
each, that this may be in very truth at this hour a 
house of God, a place of prayer, the gate of heaven; 
that here we may feel ourselves to be caught out of 
the stress and burden and sorrow and weight of this 
world and to be carried into the joy and glory and 



93 

peace of Thy presence, into that secret place of the 
Most High where no plague can come nigh us or our 
dwelling, because the angels of the Lord are bearing 
us up in their arms lest we dash even our foot against 
a stone. Hear this our common prayer with the for- 
giveness of our sins. Answer not the words of our 
petition, O Lord, our God. Answer Thou to the deep- 
est longing and aspirations of our hearts, that we 
may be a people whose God is the Lord, and that we 
in the light of His life may continue, until our journey 
too shall end ; that we may dwell in the house of the 
Lord forever; through riches of mercy in Christ 
Jesus, our Lord, to whom with Thee and the Holy 
Ghost be all honor and glory, world without end. 

— Amen. 

SERMON BY DR. CALKINS 

Our text this morning is found in the book of the 
Revelation, the third chapter and the eighth verse : 

" Behold I have set before thee an open door, 
which no man can shut." 

This is the word of a prophet to a church in Asia 
two thousand years ago; but when a man opens his 
mouth to prophesy about the Church in the day in 
which we live he is very likely to invert that verse, 
and to make it read like this : " Behold I have set 
before thee a door that is shut and no man can open 
it." In other words, there are plenty of people who 
have their doubts about the future of institutional 
religion, in the day in which we live. That the spirit 
of Jesus Christ will survive, that the ideals of Christi- 
anity will prevail, they do not doubt ; but they cherish 
the idea that the Church has for her chief possession 
not a present and not a future, but only a past. 



94 

There is a very comfortable persuasion upon the 
part of most people who are outside of the Christian 
Church, and a very uncomfortable persuasion upon 
the part of some people who are inside the Church, 
that it has seen its best days. Our Lord said that He 
would found His Church upon a rock and that the 
gates of hell should not prevail against it; but if we 
are to listen to what a good many people say in our 
day we must incline to the persuasion that the gates 
of hell already have prevailed against it. We are sur- 
rounded by an insistent and by a voluminous senti- 
ment to the effect that the Church has fallen upon 
evil days and is in itself in a very bad way. To a 
great many people the Christian Church presents the 
spectacle of singing " Onward, Christian Soldiers," 
at the same time that it is itself steadily falling back- 
wards. Our papers and our magazines are filled with 
articles about the ebb of ecclesiasticism, and about the 
decline of institutional religion, and about the failure 
of the Church. Especially we are asked to cast our 
eyes behind us, and to contrast the plight into which 
we are now fallen with the Church as it used to be 
in the good old days of our fathers. We are reminded 
how the Church is put to it in our day to get reputable 
timber for her ministry, so that whereas we used to 
have wooden churches and granite ministers, now all 
too often we have granite churches and wooden min- 
isters. We are asked to contrast the position of the 
Church in the community as it exists to-day with the 
position which it used to possess when all but a frac- 
tion of the community would be found within the 
Church, and the fraction that was outside was the 
least influential portion of it; whereas now we are 
told there is only a fraction of a community that is 
interested in the Church and that too is the least in- 



95 

fluential portion of it. So that too many people it 
seems like mere irony to quote this word of a prophet 
of the Christian Church, " Behold I have set before 
thee an open door, and no man can shut it." 

I ask you on this anniversary occasion to look at 
the Church as it exists to-day in our modern social 
order. We have taken the backward look. Let us 
take the forward look. We have seen what our fath- 
ers have done. Let us see what there is for us to do. 
We have rendered account of whence we have come. 
Let us render account of whither we are going. We 
have seen what the Church was. Let us see what the 
Church is. And I have recorded my own persua- 
sion in the text which I have chosen. I announce 
as the burden of my message to-day the conviction 
that the Church not only is not moribund, but that she 
was never more alive; not only that she has a future, 
but that she never had such a future ; not only that 
the door before her is not shut, but that it was never 
wider open. Not in irony, but in deliberate prophecy 
I give you the word of our text, " Behold, I have set 
before thee an open door, and no man can shut it." 

In the first place, then, let us try to rid ourselves 
of the delusion that there existed somewhere behind 
us a kind of an ecclesiastical paradise; that there was 
somewhere in the days of our fathers a golden age of 
the Church to which we must look back but to which 
we can never look forward. Really I do not know of 
any well-accepted idea which can so little stand the test 
of history. When I turn the pages of my church his- 
tory and try to locate an ecclesiastical paradise, I am 
as much put to it as the archaeologist is when he turns 
up the soil of Mesopotamia and tries to locate a 
Garden of Eden. The fact is that each is a myth; 
that neither has any actual or historic existence. 



96 

Summon to your aid all the church history that you 
ever knew or ever hope to know, and tell me where- 
abouts in the past you are going to locate the Garden 
of Eden in the history of the Church. Will you go 
back to the New Testament times? Well, already 
you find the story of a prayer meeting that ended in 
a brawl, and you find that all St. John can say of a 
certain church is that the Lord God would spew it out 
of his mouth. If you examine the halcyon ante- 
Nicene days, already you find the good old church 
fathers arming themselves to the teeth in order to 
defend nice points in theology, and find churchmen 
prepared to throw each other bodily out of the Church 
because of hair-breadth variations in the interpreta- 
tion of a single text. I suppose that the person who 
is even most in the grip of this delusion, that there 
does exist somewhere in the past an ecclesiastical para- 
dise, would pass over rather rapidly the middle ages, 
and even the days of the Reformation when Martin 
Luther threw his ink pot at a personal devil, and when 
John Calvin declared that unless the Lord God should 
descend from above, they would be engulfed in bar- 
barism. Now I think that most people when they try 
to locate this good old time in the history of the 
Church think of our New England days, and of the 
Church as it used to exist in the days of our New 
England fathers. But Mr. Fosdick in his recent ar- 
ticle in the Atlantic Monthly has pointed out how 
difficult it is to find good old church days even in the 
history of New England. Will you set it down, he 
asks, in those days when the Congregationalists of 
Massachusetts and when the Episcopalians of Virginia 
were trying to set up a state church that should be 
supported by a public tax? Will you put it as late 
as 1833, when Lyman Beecher bewailed it as an in- 



97 

tolerable calamity that people of a different religious 
persuasion from his own were not compelled to con- 
tribute to his salary? Will you set it down in the 
days when no Governor Hughes could depend on any 
general sentiment to support him in his assault upon 
public gambling, but when many a meeting house 
went up in the city of New York erected by means of 
a public lottery? Will you put it down in the days 
when no such books as Jesus Christ and the Social 
Question, or as The Social Aspects of Christianity 
were so much as dreamed of, but when Tennyson's 
aunt could rock herself back and forth weeping copi- 
ously because she said the Lord God had elected her 
to everlasting salvation but had damned her neighbors 
who were just as good as she? Shall we go back to 
the days of Jonathan Edwards who pictured the Lord 
God holding souls over a brimstone pit, or shall we 
go back to the days of John Ruskin who declared that 
his Sundays used to cast their shadows upon his life 
three days in advance? If we go back to the good 
old days of John Higginson, we find him preaching 
in Salem and declaring that the cause of a pure re- 
ligion was exceeding decaying and expiring in this 
country, and when we listen to Cotton Mather, preach- 
ing in his good old days, we find him declaring that 
" the body of the rising generation is a poor, perishing, 
unconverted, and except the Lord God pour down His 
spirit, an undone generation." And I fancy that if 
we should read the letters and confessions of the min- 
isters who used to preach in what are called the good 
old New England days we should find more real pessi- 
mism and more lamentation than ministers are guilty 
of in even their most lugubrious moments in the days 
in which we live. The fact is there have been no good 
old days. The straight and narrow path has never 



98 

been overcrowded. The kingdom of Heaven has never 
been taken by violence. When our Lord said that 
just one handful of seed was going to fall on good 
ground, He spoke a parable not only for His time 
but He spoke a parable for all time; and when he 
told his first band of twelve disciples that there would 
be many a house and many a city that would turn 
them out, he was speaking the truth not only for that 
apostolic band, but for every band of his true apostles. 
There never have been any good old days, li you 
will read the church history of your fathers, you will 
make up your mind that you would not bring back 
the Church of your fathers if you could. It was a 
good Church for their day, but it is not a good enough 
Church for our day. Perhaps their meeting houses 
were crowded two or three times of a Sunday; but 
these congregations had not begun to grapple with the 
problems of their world or the problems of our world, 
and they were not sending out one single missionary 
to testify of Jesus Christ in foreign lands. The Church 
of our fathers was a good Church, but the Church of 
their sons is a better Church, and one does not need 
to be a deluded optimist if he cherishes the conviction 
that the Church of our sons is going to be even better 
and stronger than the Church of their fathers. "Be- 
hold, I have set before thee an open door, and no 
man can shut it." 

I want to revive your faith, if it needs any re- 
viving, in the Church of Jesus Christ. I want you 
to have an intelligent and an invincible persuasion 
that it has its place in the world of our day just as 
surely as it had its place in the world of yesterday. 
I want you to feel that the Church has greater things 
before it than it has behind it; that there is indeed 
before it an open door, and one that no man can shut. 



99 

Now, I grant you that some doors are shut and 
no man can open them. For example, the Church is 
no longer a means of secular education. Well, it was 
once. There was a time when people came to church 
not only to worship, but they came to church to get 
information. There was a day when a church pastor 
was the only college graduate in town. Harvard Col- 
lege was moved to Cambridge in order that its stu- 
dents might have the benefit not only of the piety 
but also of the learning of Thomas Shepard. But 
that door is shut, and no man can open it. To-day 
theological students come to Cambridge in order that 
they may get their learning and culture from Harvard 
University. Every pastor knows that there are people 
in his pews that know more than he will ever know, 
and that they have on their shelves at home books that 
will tell them more than he can ever tell them. That 
door is shut and no man can open it. 

Also there was a time when the Church was the 
center of the social life of the community, and when 
the people came to church not only to meet with their 
God, but to meet with their fellow-men. That is why 
church buildings were called meeting houses. Out 
from their separated and isolated homes people came 
to a common meeting place where they could not only 
share their experience with their Maker, but where 
they could share and compare their experiences with 
each other. Now that door is shut and no man can 
open it. Our social order is honeycombed with all 
kinds of organizations that provide that sort of recre- 
ation for the people of to-day. The Church ought to 
provide fellowship and it is providing fellowship, but 
the Church is no longer needed as the center of social 
recreation. 



100 

There was a time when the Church was a dis- 
penser of charity. What if a man wanted clothing? 
He came to the Church. What if he wanted care 
when he was sick ? It was the Church that helped him. 
And that door is closed and no man can open it. 
Every charitable institution in this or any other com- 
munity is a child of the Christian Church, but no- 
body recognizes that fact; and if a man goes to a 
hospital or if a man receives relief, he does not feel 
that he owes anything to the Church. The door is 
shut and no man can open it. 

But I want to tell you that while it is true that 
these doors are shut and no man can open them, it is 
also true that there is one door that is open, always 
has been open, always will be open, and no man can 
shut it. Jesus said, " I am the living bread which came 
down from heaven. If any man eat of this bread, he 
shall live forever." Jesus, said " I am the good shep- 
herd, and I lay down my life for the sheep." " I am 
the door. By me if any man enter in, he shall go in 
and out and find pasture." And the Church of Jesus 
Christ is called to be the Christ of God to human so- 
ciety, to break the bread of life to famishing multi- 
tudes, to lead them out into green and living pastures, 
and to provide for scared and scattered multitudes of 
men by sacrificial love a leadership that shall bring 
them Home. Deprived of its other and its subordinate 
functions, the Church is thrown back upon its real 
mission. " Behold, I set before thee an open door, 
and no man can shut it." 

This door cannot be shut because the hunger and 
thirst of the soul for a living God remains unchanged 
from age to age. The questioning mind and the 
wondering heart and the suffering soul can find its 
satisfaction alone in the contemplation, the knowledge 



lOI 

and the service of God. The human mind may advance 
in wisdom, but the universe will never be so cheapened 
that it will fail to inspire awe, and human life will 
never be so materialized that moral obligations and 
spiritual aspirations will cease. Now to bring down 
the life and the presence of God to do its sacramental 
work upon the human life and the human heart, that 
remains the mission of the Church in this age and in 
every age. 

I will grant you at once that merely as an agent for 
secular culture or merely as a dispenser of secular 
information, or merely as a doer of secular tasks, the 
Church has no future. But I tell you, too, that as a 
channel for the communication of spiritual grace and 
as a center for the inspiration of spiritual life, the 
Church not only has a future but it never had quite 
the future that it has to-day. A truly spiritual Church 
has absolutely nothing to fear in this age or in any 
age, and I am inclined to think, rather less in this age 
than in any age. Unless thoughtful observers are much 
mistaken, there is a tremendous turning toward the 
sources of spiritual life upon the rank and file of 
men and women who are living just in the days in 
which we find ourselves now. All over this land of 
ours there are multitudes of men and of women who 
have been trained in modern ways of thinking and 
who are quite beyond the reach of ecclesiasticism and 
quite beyond the reach of dogmatism, who have 
yet a great hunger and a great thirst in their souls, 
and are panting even as a hart for the water brooks 
for the knowledge of a God that is alive. These 
people do not want a complicated faith, and they are 
not looking for an elaborate faith, but they do want 
to believe in something. Witness, for example, the 
extraordinary sale and circulation in our day of re- 



102 



ligious books, the demand for which far exceeds the 
supply. Think of the vast circulation of such books 
as those of Mr. Dresser and of Mr. Trine, books that 
are not very serious literature, and books really which 
are not very serious philosophy, but books which are 
sold by the hundreds and thousands because of the 
hundreds and thousands of us who want by some 
means to get in tune with the Infinite. 

People are beginning to have their misgivings in 
the day in which we live. They are having desperate 
misgivings about the power of material things perman- 
ently to satisfy the human soul. There are thousands 
of men to-day whose property lies on their soul just 
like a dead weight. There are thousands of people 
who, if they could underscore one verse in the New 
Testament and declare out of their own experience 
that that was God's truth, would underscore this verse : 
"A man's life consists not in the abundance of 
the things that he possesses, but in love, joy, peace 
in the Holy Ghost." People are having their misgiv- 
ings about the ability of science really to answer the 
questions on which a man's health and happiness and 
holiness depend. People are waking up to the fact 
that science really asks more questions than it answers. 
What science has done is to make a world for us 
that is a nightmare if it has no God somewhere in it. 
What science has done is to lift the heavens so far 
above our heads as to frighten us, and literally to take 
the solid ground from beneath our feet, so that a man 
looks around in the kind of a world that science has 
made for him in our day, and feels that he will go mad 
unless there is an intelligence and unless there is a 
love there somewhere. People are finding it much 
more easy to believe in the God of Abraham and of 
Isaac and of Jacob than to think of themselves as 



103 

clinging to the thin outside crust of a planet that is 
being hurled through abysmal distances at simply in- 
credible velocity without an eye to look on or an ear 
to hear or a heart to care. That thing has become 
unbelievable. 

Again, people are having their misgivings about 
what popular philosophy has to say on the subject 
of sin. Think of reading such words as these, for 
example, in Collier's Weekly. I quote them roughly. 
" People are having their misgivings as to what a 
popular philosophy has to say on the subject of sin: 
that if a man sins to-day it is largely a matter of 
temperament. He sins because his grandfather was 
a sinner, or he sins because he lives on the wrong 
street corner. Now, that ought to comfort a man, 
but somehow it does not, and it ought to take the 
ache out of his heart, but instead it leaves it there. 
It leaves him with the blight of sin on his soul and it 
leaves him with a heart that is ashamed. So that 
men are beginning to turn back to the old Book 
which when it talks about sin does not say any cheap 
and easy words about it at all, but before it gets 
through talking about sin tells a man that there is 
a God with Whom there is forgiveness, that He may 
be feared, and speaks to him the words, ' Go and 
sin no more.' " 

Then there are people in this world who are des- 
perately tired. But when they look at their business 
they do not find rest there; and when they look at 
the stars they do not find rest there; and when they 
look in their newspaper there is nothing restful there. 
And they are beginning to listen to the Voice of Gal- 
ilee that said, " Come unto me and I will give you 
rest." 



104 

Or again, there are multitudes of lonely people: 
people that just want to be loved, people that want 
to be taken care of. When they started out to live 
they did it with a stout heart, but if you should try 
to define the state of heart they are in now, all you 
could say is that they are homesick. And they are 
beginning to listen to the words of a Book that tells 
them that " behind this rude and temporary universe 
of ours there is a Being of love that knows how to 
get close to the littlest child or to the oldest man when 
he is sick at heart because of his loneliness." People 
are standing up by hundreds and thousands all around 
us and they are saying, "What consolation have we 
got anyway, that we should turn our back upon this 
consolation? Has our heart then got so strong by 
the wear and by the tear of the centuries that no longer 
we have a sin that needs to be forgiven and no longer 
have we a sorrow that needs to be comforted? Has 
our science become so acute as to wipe failure out 
of a man's life? At last has evolution produced a 
man who is and knows himself to be all-sufficient and 
all-sufficing?" If only we had eyes to see and hearts 
to feel it, we would know the throb of a great multi- 
tude who want to get back to God, back to the Bible, 
back to Jesus Christ. " Behold, I set before thee 
an open door, and no man can shut it," for the reason 
that you cannot still that hunger, and you cannot hush 
up that cry, and you cannot put your hand up to crush 
the unrest of that troubled heart. 

I grant that people are crying less for theology 
and I know that they are crying out less for doctrinal 
and ecclesiastical controversy. But that does not 
mean that they are crying out less for religion. They 
want less of the paraphernalia, but they want more of 
the power. They want less of the husk, but they want 



105 

more of the kernel. They want a religion; a religion 
that will cure their maladies, and above all, a religion 
that will supply a real uplift and re-enforcement to 
what they know to be the inadequate spiritual re- 
sources of their own lives. People have found out that 
the cares of this world are so many, and its problems 
are so heavy, and its perplexities strike so deep, that 
they can be saved only by a great tide of spiritual 
vitality; and they have made the discovery that if 
that tide is to flow forth from any source, it will flow 
forth from the very throne of God. " Behold, I have 
set before thee an open door, and no man can shut 
it." Think of a spiritual church standing in a day 
just like ours, witnessing for the things wherein all 
men are one, witnessing for all the things whereby all 
men live. A thousand voices call for it, but what they 
call for is a spiritual church that is just anointed, 
transfigured and inspired by the very mind of Jesus 
Christ. 

Let me go one step farther and point out that when 
a truly spiritual Church thus satisfies the restless 
human heart, it will help to solve every problem of 
a restless outside world. Now if there is one word 
that can characterize the world in which we live, it is 
the word Unrest. Think of the books that line our 
book shelves with the word Unrest as their titles: 
our social Unrest, our industrial Unrest, our political 
Unrest. Trace all this unrest to its source, and you 
find that source to be the restless human heart. This 
heart-restlessness has gone on in ever widening circles 
until it has literally covered land and continent, earth 
and sea and sky. How put an end to our unrest? 
Only by putting an end to the restlessness of the hu- 
man soul. In other words, the real problem before 
us is not an economic problem, and it is not a social 



io6 

problem. It is neither an industrial problem, nor a 
political problem. In the last analysis, it is just a 
spiritual problem. Human society, we have come to 
understand, is never going to be saved into sweetness 
and soundness except by the moralization, except by 
the spiritualization of its members. A right spirit 
will be far more searching, far more exacting, and 
far more effective than law, regulation, or legislation. 
We must pacify the human heart before we can put 
the world at rest. And men are looking all around 
them for some force that is adequate to the task. What 
will solve our spiritual problem? What will set at 
rest the human heart ? And men are realizing as never 
before that there is only one force that can give rest 
to the human heart, and that is the mind of Him who 
said, " Let not your heart be troubled." " That mind 
penetrates all the perplexities of human relations and 
solves the problems of life in all of its phases. It is 
upon the Spirit of Christ working through individuals 
and shaping and inspiring our politics that we must de- 
pend to straighten out the tangles in our affairs. That 
is the only force that is equal to so huge a task: that 
can make capital duly tolerant of labor, and labor duly 
tolerant of capital, that can keep the spiritual in 
control of the material, and can bring liberty and op- 
portunity to all creatures to work out all that there 
is in them of good." What the world needs as never 
before is the mind of Jesus Christ. 

" Behold, I have set before thee an open door." 
In the realization of this vast fact will you tell me 
when in the whole history of the Christian Church 
it had an opportunity commensurate with the oppor- 
tunity as it exists to-day? Look down for a moment 
into the coming years and imagine what it will mean 
if the world of our possessions becomes also the world 



107 

of our faith; if the world of our knowledge becomes 
also the world of our hope; if the world of our power 
becomes the world of our love. I tell you, eye hath not 
seen, ear hath not heard, neither hath it entered into the 
mind of man to conceive what confessors of Jesus 
Christ can do in the day in which we live if they only 
love God. The Church has no power aside from the 
dignity and presence of Jesus Christ. The Church has 
indescribable dignity and power if possessed by the 
mind of Jesus Christ. 

People talk sometimes about the foolishness of 
preaching. There is some preaching that is foolish, 
but there never was quite such a chance for a spiritual 
preacher as in the day in which we live. When I 
think of the kind of preaching that I think men want 
in our day, I remember some words that Phillips 
Brooks once wrote after he had heard George Mac- 
Donald preach. " There were all the good and there 
were all the bad elements in the man's style; manly, 
rugged honesty, with some tendency to sentimen- 
tality. But over and through it all there was this 
quality : it was a message from God to those people 
by him. The man struggled as a child struggles with 
his imperfectly mastered tongue that will not tell the 
errand as he received it and had it in his mind. As I 
listened, I seemed to see how weak in contrast was 
the way in which other preachers had amused me or 
challenged my admiration by the working of their 
minds. But here was a real Gospel, here were real 
tidings." It is such spiritual prophecy communicating 
the mind of Christ that constitutes the open door to 
the preacher of our day. 



io8 

It is the Spirit of Christ that alone gives vitalizing 
power to Christian living and opens wide the door 
to the humblest follower of Jesus Christ to-day. For 
faith ultimately is not taught from this pulpit or from 
any other pulpit. Real faith is not taught at all; it 
is caught. And let a man's life somehow be sur- 
charged with the spirit of Jesus Christ and he will 
communicate it to a hundred other lives with which he 
comes in contact. To every Christian life is offered the 
infinite possibility of being a bit of leaven in the lump 
which can transmit its own hidden secret power, till 
the whole lump be leavened with the sacramental 
grace of Jesus Christ. 

What can the Church do, men ask, in such a day 
as this? Well, what can it do? What can it do but 
to strike its spiritual note clearly and strongly? What 
can it do but to lift its life up to the very highest 
spiritual levels that it knows anything about? And 
that is all it has to do. And when it has done that, 
it will answer the prayer of Jesus Christ for his own 
Church, that He might present it to Himself pure, 
without wrinkle, without spot, unto the day of Jesus 
Christ. 

My dear friends, on this anniversary Sunday 
morning, I want you to believe in your Church as 
you never believed in it before. I want you to be- 
lieve it has a mission and an opportunity such as it 
never had before. I want you to dedicate yourselves 
to it as you never dedicated yourselves to it before, 
that the word of true prophecy may be realized, " I 
have set before thee an open door, and no man can 
shut it." 



log 

Oh, holy Sabbath bells, 

Ye have a pleasant voice. 
Through all the land your music swells 
And man with one commandment tells 
To rest and to rejoice. 

As thirsty travellers sing 

Through desert paths that pass 
To hear the welcome waters spring 
And see beyond the spray they fling 
Tall trees and waving grass : 

So we rejoice to know 

Your melody begun, 
For when our paths are parched below, 
Ye tell us where green pastures grow 

And living waters run. 

For His dear name's sake, Amen. 



CLOSING PRAYER BY DR. CALKINS 

Almighty God, our heavenly Father, grant, we be- 
seech Thee, that thy Holy Spirit may rest upon us at 
this hour. Fill us with all joy and hope in believing, 
O Lord, our God. Grant that the words that we 
have heard this day with our outward ears may, by Thy 
grace, be so grafted inwardly in our hearts that they 
may bring forth in our lives the fruit of good living, 
to the honor and praise of Thy Name, through Jesus 
Christ our Lord. Amen, 



SERMON AT THE COMMUNION 
SERVICE 



By Rev. Charles G. Burd 



" Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving 
against sin." Hebrews 12 .-4. 

What a splendid challenge this is ! What a fitting 
climax to the preceding chapter! For in the eleventh 
chapter, you remember, the apostle has been eulogiz- 
ing the heroes of the faith — Abraham, Gideon, and the 
martyrs. Then he bids his own followers lay aside 
every weight that they may contest with like heroism ; 
and finally he urges them to the utmost exertion, in 
the words of the text : " Ye have not yet resisted 
unto blood, striving against sin." 

We do not know to whom this epistle was ad- 
dressed other than that they were Hebrew converts ; 
we do not know what their condition was or how 
greatly they had suffered for the cause of Christ; 
we do not know, of a certainty, who the author was 
But what matters it? We have its splendid record 
of noble heroism, and the summons to courageous 
action. And who of us who profess the name of 
Christian can be unmoved? 

Judging from internal evidence the apostle who 
penned this message was trying to prepare his fol- 
lowers for some day of sore trial. They were men- 
naced by some threatening evil, and the time was 
approaching when their courage would be tried to the 
uttermost. The year was about 70 A. D. — a time 



112 



filled with persecutions of all sorts, a time of terror 
and anguish, a testing-time for all who professed 
themselves followers of Jesus. Many a Christian 
community had been destroyed through the hatred 
of the Roman Emperors; many a Christian man and 
woman had suffered dreadful tortures ; many had 
resisted unto blood. It was not a time for ease and 
indolence, for indifference and cowardice ; but for 
the greatest courage and faith. This the apostle knew, 
for after setting forth the splendid heroism of the past, 
he calls upon these Hebrew converts for a like hero- 
ism. He reminds them of the cloud of witnesses, he 
bids them " call to remembrance the former days in 
which they themselves endured a great testing," and 
he tells them of the greater trials to come. Instead 
of allowing them to rest content, he summons them 
to the utmost exertions with the words, " Ye have 
not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin." 

I have chosen this verse for my text, for it seems 
to emphasize a side of the Christian life too often 
forgotten, to-day. It is a call not to passiveness, but 
aggressiveness ; not to a meek waiting for the King- 
dom to come, but to a heroic and persevering assault 
on the enemies of the Kingdom ; not to a sitting down 
content with victories already won, but to a struggle 
to the death. This is one good thing about the Bible 
— it keeps the soul alive; it does not allow us to rest 
upon our laurels, but urges us on from conquest to 
conquest. It is wholesome medicine to turn back at 
times to the prophets of Israel — those brave, patient 
men who fought so unflinchingly against the en- 
trenched evils of their day — the idolatry, the immor- 
ality, the godlessness so prevalent; Isaiah, Amos, 
Hosea, Jeremiah, — and no one is more inspiring than 
Jeremiah. In one place, when he is discouraged, he 



"3 

calls upon the Lord and receives this cryptic answer: 
"If thou hast run with the footmen and they have 
wearied thee, how canst thou contend with horses? 
And if in a land of peace thou art scarcely secure, 
how wilt thou do in the pride of Jordan?" The pride 
of Jordan being the dangerous ground by the river 
where the vegetation was rank and fever-breeding and 
where wild beasts made their lair; a place of the 
greatest menace to health and to life. The prophet 
asked for an answer of peace and assurance, and he 
was told that there were greater dangers ahead. What 
he had endured was as nothing to what he was to en- 
dure. And it was only too true. In a short time Ne- 
buchadrezzar was besieging Jerusalem and carrying her 
people away in chains, and the prophet was an exile. 
Surely the Bible doesn't promise an easy life to the 
servant of God. If we are looking for an easy time, 
we should not choose the road of righteousness, for it 
is narrow and rocky and too often leads to the crown 
of thorns and the cross. 

This is the message of the apostle to his people, 
however, and it applies to us also. Ye have done well, 
but there is far more to do; ye have run with the 
footmen, now run with the horsemen; ye have been 
sorely tested, but ye have not yet resisted unto blood. 

Why is it, I wonder, that so many look upon the 
religion of Christ as a religion of passiveness, of 
peace, when it is one continuous struggle against evil 
within and without? To be sure, Jesus promised us 
peace — " My peace I give unto you ; my peace I leave 
with you," but he also said — " I have come not to 
bring peace but a sword." 

In the sermon on the mount, he said : " Resist 
not evil." But, again, he said, " Let him who hath 
no sword, sell his cloak and buy one." A noted Eng- 



114 

lish writer says, apropos of this: "Christianity 
is made up of contradictions which counteract each 
other. There has ever been room in it for a St. 
Francis, praising all good, and for a St. Jerome, 
denouncing all evil ; for priests that did not fight 
and for crusaders that did. All that the Church did 
was to prevent either of these good things from oust- 
ing the other." 

This is cleverly said, but the writer has confused 
the letter with the spirit, the Church with Christianity. 
The Church ever has been full of contradictions; 
Christianity — and by Christianity I mean the true re- 
ligion of Christ — Christianity has ever had but one 
central message — " Resist evil." To be sure, some of 
Jesus' sayings seem to contradict each other; but 
when we interpret them in the light of his life, we 
realize that such contradictions do not really exist. 
His message is so plain that he who runs may read. 
And although some of his sayings would seem to 
mean that the Christian is to sit passive in the face 
of evil, we know that such is not the case. The whole 
life of Jesus was a continual resistance against evil, 
from the day when he went apart into the wilderness 
to the day when his hands and feet were pierced with 
the cruel nails. 'T came not to send peace, but a 
sword." And, although he promised his disciples 
peace — his peace, it was the peace that comes only 
after conflict. 

Truly the followers of Jesus have never had an 
easy time of it; nor will they have until evil is con- 
quered. The history of the Christian Church is not 
one of peace and quiet. One has but to recall the 
struggles from the days of Nero to the present — the 
martyrs, the Hugenots, the Waldensians, the Puritans, 
to realize this beyond a doubt. And the Church that 



"5 

is enjoying peace has surely shut her eyes to the evil 
so prevalent. We sometimes forget that the Church 
is not a hospital, but a fortress ; and that we Christians 
are not pensioners but active men-at-arms. This is 
the truth that the apostle was emphasizing to his fol- 
lowers : " Gird yourselves ; the hosts of evil are all 
about you; quit you like men; be strong. Resist — 
resist unto blood !" 

The word resist, in the original Greek, means 
standing out against, enduring steadfastly. As used 
here it might apply to a Marathon runner as he nears 
the goal, covered with sweat and dust, ready to drop 
from weariness, but struggling on. It might refer 
to the gladiator in the arena, fighting desperately 
against overwhelming odds — the plaything of a Caesar 
• — faint and bloody, yet never yielding. For the apos- 
tle has just been speaking of the contest, bidding his 
followers cast aside every weight and the sin which 
besets — that is, which clings about them as a garment 
retarding their progress ; and to contest, to endure with 
patience. But do not think that patience, as used 
here, means passive resignation, bloodless inactivity. 
Far from it; it means rather the endurance of the 
soldier who repels the enemy's charge again and again, 
the endurance of the martyr under the tortures of the 
rack. 

Such endurance, such resistance as was displayed 
by Luther, when he said, " I will go to Worms though 
there be as many devils there as there are tiles on 
the houses " ; such as Savonarola offered against the 
aggressive evils of the church of Rome; such as Lin- 
coln made when he stood firm against the wrongs of 
slavery, trying to avoid war if possible, but never yield- 
ing; such resistance as the Christian heroes of all 
ages have shown — the prophets, the martyrs, who 



ii6 

through endurance " subdued kingdoms, wrought 
righteousness, stopped the mouths of Hons, turned to 
flight the armies of the ahens " — the Abrahams, the 
Stephens, the Livingstones, the Pitkins of the ages — 
the heirs of the Kingdom. 

A resistance unto blood; but their own blood, not 
the blood of slaughtered foemen. A conquest 
not in the name of self, but of right. Not in the 
spirit of hate, but of love. What can be nobler? 
What more deserving of our reverence and imitation? 
Surely, one of the most divine traits of man is this 
spirit of endurance for a noble cause, in the face of 
great, overmastering difficulties. Who can read the 
story of Captain Scott in his fatal expedition to the 
pole without being deeply moved? who can picture 
his patient, uncomplaining, heroic struggle without 
a catch in the throat, as, with death staring him in 
the face, he writes : 

" I do not regret this journey, which has shown 
that Englishmen can endure hardships, help one an- 
other, and meet death with as great fortitude as ever 
in the past. We took risks ; we knew we took them. 
Things have come out against us; and we have no 
cause for complaint, but bow to the will of Provi- 
dence, determined still to do our best to the last." 
Splendid! And although the object may seem un- 
worthy to some, who can estimate the moral value 
of such an exhibition of manhood and self-sacrifice? 
Resisting unto blood. 

Or if you will see a man with a nobler motive, 
read the journal of David Livingstone during the 
last few days of his fatal struggle. Wading in water 
up to his waist, ready to drop from, weariness and 
malarial fever, surrounded by hostile natives and the 
dangers of a tropical forest, he writes: "I am pale, 



"7 

bloodless and weak from profuse bleeding, and but 
for help could not move a hundred yards, yet nothing 
earthly will make me give up my work in despair. I 
encourage myself in the Lord, my God, and go for- 
ward." To open the dark continent to the light. Re- 
sisting unto blood. 

And if we would have a still nobler example of 
such endurance, let us turn our eyes to Him who 
blazed the trail, who charted the wilderness of life, 
who taught men the great lesson of self-sacrifice, of 
undying devotion to a noble cause. 

" Who died that we might be forgiven, 
Who died to make us good, 
That we might go at last to heaven, 
Saved by his precious blood." 

The cross of Christ! What a stupendous mystery 
it is! 

We do not understand the part it plays in the re- 
demption of mankind, but we do know that it is the 
supreme test of endurance, of eternal love, of resist- 
ance against evil. 

And who can look at that cross without a tinge of 
shame? Before it, how mean appear our struggles, 
how petty our conquests ! As we gaze upon it, the 
superscription appears altered, and instead of the 
taunting words of Pilate — " The King of the Jews " — 
we read the condemnation of the apostle: "Ye have 
not resisted unto blood, striving against sin." " The 
martyrs of all the ages have died for truth and 
right; what have ye done?" 

What have we done ? How much of an effort have 
we made in this eternal struggle against evil — evil 
in our own souls, evil in the world about us? How 
half-hearted we have been, how indifferent ! We have 



ii8 

made some effort, all of us, but we have not resisted 
unto blood. We did run well, but were soon weary; 
we put our hands to the plough, but we turned back, 
or we followed in a heartless manner. Many of us 
have allowed the weeds of sin to choke our very souls 
— selfishness, avarice, greed, impurity. And we stand 
condemned. 

I need not mention these sins one by one. Each 
one knows his own. And each knows how poor and 
half-hearted has been his struggle to overcome. Some 
have sinned in the grosser ways; some in the subtler. 
But all have sinned and come short of the glory of 
God. Some have been indifferent, saying — " What is 
the value of all this effort? This life is all. Let us 
eat and drink, for to-morrow we die." 

Others have made some conquests and are resting 
content. " We are better than many of our neighbors 
— we are abstemious, we are honest, we are truthful. 
Have we not in thy name cast out devils, and done 
many mighty works? Surely God cannot expect 
perfection of us." 

Still others have started out bravely, but have lost 
courage when the inherited and the acquired sins 
seemed so impregnable. Yes, temperament is strong, 
and no man or woman reaches middle life without 
times of despair at the slight advance made in self- 
mastery. 

How poor and weak is all such apology in the 
face of the heroism of the past! Can we be content 
with our little conquests, with such examples before 
us? How far would we get in the work of Hfe, if we 
approached it so half-heartedly? We would be ashamed 
to attack our business problems with as little heart. 
The successful business man to-day must be ever on 
the alert; he must work twelve, yes, fifteen hours 



119 

every day to conquer; he must throw himself into his 
business with absolute abandon. The scientist, the in- 
ventor cannot attain his goal without striving to the 
utmost. See the years that Thomas Edison worked to 
perfect his little incandescent lamp; see the time and 
strength that Dr. Carrel has put into his medical 
research. And shall we expect to conquer the in- 
grained sin of ages with less effort? No! Resisting 
unto blood — that is our duty. Getting a grip on that 
besetting sin and casting it away forever. Standing 
with back to the wall against the many temptations and 
forcing them to retreat. Masters of our fate; cap- 
tains of our souls. 

But the conquest of self is not all. When we have 
overcome the evil within, there is still the evil with- 
out. Even if our homes are swept and garnished, 
there is plenty of dirt outside. And our duty as 
Christians is not done so long as there is sin in the 
world about us. Why do men still recline on the 
mediaeval idea that to save one's own soul is enough? 
Surely, Jesus never taught such a selfish Gospel. 
" Follow me, that I may make you fishers of men." 
" Go into all the world, and make disciples of all peo- 
ples." " Depart from me, for ye did not minister unto 
the least of these, my brethren." 

Christianity and selfishness are as far apart as 
nadir and zenith. Christianity means brotherhood, 
and so long as one soul is unsaved, our salvation is 
not assured ; so long as one soul is struggling in sin — 
and we are conscious of it — our duty is not done ; we 
have not yet resisted unto blood. 

We may not have been the cause of the evil about 
us, but we are to blame if it continues. We are our 
brother's keepers. The danger that threatens him 
threatens us. And that there are many and great 



120 

evils about us we all know too well. There are ills 
enough in home, in business, in state, to stagger any 
but brave souls. We see them right here around us; 
we read of them every day in newspaper, periodical, 
and novel, — the evils of the saloon, and of the dive, 
the prostitution of justice, the many dishonesties in 
business, the exploitation of labor by capital, the op- 
pression of the poor by the rich and powerful, graft 
and mal-administration in public office, class-hatred, 
child-labor, — an endless host. 

On one side a state shaken to its very foundations 
by the dishonesty of scheming politicians; on the 
other a huge corporation beggaring many dependent 
souls through its gross mismanagement. Here a mur- 
derer buying his freedom despite the laws of man and 
of God; there a great city given over to the powers 
of evil through the corruption of its officials. Here 
the stability of the home threatened through lowered 
standards and too easy divorce; there the Church 
itself endangered by too lax Sabbath laws. On all 
sides, the suffering caused by selfishness, lust, greed. 
And, shut our eyes as we will, the evil is there — we 
know it. Surely there is much to be done; and no 
man can call himself a follower of Christ who is not 
in some way trying to right these wrongs. They 
may not all come within our reach ; we may not agree 
on our definitions of them, but there are some at 
our very doors, some that we can remedy. It is no 
time for pessimism, for the world is growing better; 
a casual glimpse at the history of the past will satisfy 
us of this. But the advance is slow. Our fathers 
have done much; they have left much to be done. 
We have done much, but not all we could, and the 
times are ripe. Never were there nobler leaders — 
men and women in all ranks of society — statesmen, 



121 



educators, attorneys, philanthropists; but they need 
our help ; they cannot conquer alone. And if we are 
loyal to our traditions, we will not sit idle. Until 
we have done our part, we will not rest content. We 
must resist unto blood, if we would be followers of 
Christ. "A high standard," you say, " an impossible 
ideal." Well, perhaps; but one glorious thing about 
Christianity is that it is always beyond us. We can 
never sound its depths, or climb its heights; the best 
endeavor of man always falls short of its ideals. The 
man who has forgiven seven times, is bidden to forgive 
seventy times seven; he who has been buffeted, is 
commanded to turn the other cheek; we are told to 
go the extra mile, to love our enemies, and to pray 
for those who despitefully use us. Discouraging at 
times, I admit; but, as Robert Browning says: — 

"A man's reach should exceed his grasp, 
Or what's heaven for." 

And to the courageous soul, this is a glorious truth — 
"the glory of going on." Always gaining, yet never 
attaining. Climbing one height only to find a height 
that is higher. Conquering one foe, only to face one 
more powerful. Such has been the ideal of the 
world's great heroes: Siegfried, striving with dragon 
and with fire ; King Arthur and his Round Table, the 
Red Cross Knight, Bunyan's Pilgrim— what are they 
all but types of the courageous soul, never daunted, 
never despairing — always longing for harder quests. 

" One who never turned his back, 
But marched breast forward, 
Never doubted clouds would break; 
Never dreamed though right were worsted 
Wrong would triumph. 

Held, we fall to rise, are baffled to fight better, 
Sleep to wake." 



122 



And would we be sharers in their heroism — we must 
follow their leadership. Can we do it? Is it possible 
to make head against the evils of the day, to stand 
firm against them until we have conquered? In our 
own strength, no! But with divine aid, we can. 

The apostle points the way when he says: "Con- 
sider him that endured, lest ye be wearied and faint 
in your minds." Consider him ! Let your mind dwell 
on Jesus, the great Saviour of man, the great victor 
over sin, him who loved us and gave himself for us. 
Consider him — his patience, his fearlessness, his won- 
derful strength; his divine pity, his unchanging love; 
yes, consider him and let your soul take courage. But 
most of all, consider the source of his power. Jesus 
was strong because the divine strength, the divine 
courage nerved his arm and fortified his soul; be- 
cause the divine purpose was his ; because he was 
in close communion with his Father; because he and 
the Father were one. 

" Believest thou not that I am in the Father and 
the Father in me; the Father that dwelleth in me, he 
doeth the works." And that same power may be ours. 
"Verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, 
the works that I do, shall he do also; and greater 
works than these shall he do." Consider him lest ye 
be wearied and faint in your minds. 

Did you ever stop to think that the ideal heroes 
of the past failed when they trusted to their own arms ; 
but with their God-given weapons, conquered? What 
was Siegfried without his divine sword, Arthur with- 
out Excalibur, the Red Cross knight without his glis- 
tening shield and blazoned cross, the pilgrim without the 
armor of God! And though these are imaginary 
heroes, they teach us the greatest truth of life, that 
the divine is omnipotent. The prophet of old saw 



123 

it when he said : " Ye shall not fear them, for the 
Lord God shall fight for you." The apostle knew 
it when he said: ''We are more than conquerors 
through him who loved us." Livingstone knew it 
when he said : "I encourage myself in the Lord my 
God and go forward." It is the great truth that has 
come ringing down the ages, from the lips of prophets, 
apostles, martyrs— "The Lord of hosts is with us." 
With his help we cannot fail. 

And it is our duty to carry on the noble work they 
have begun; it is ours to wage unyielding warfare 
against the hosts of evil, to follow our great Leader 
to the end — resisting unto blood. 

" Soldiers of Christ arise, 
And put your armor on. 
Strong in the strength which God supplies 
Through his eternal son. 

" Stand then in his great might 
With all his strength endued. 
And take to arm you for the fight. 
The panoply of God. 

"That having all things done. 
And all your conflicts past, 
Ye may o'ercome, through Christ alone, 
And stand complete at last," 



THE EVENING SERVICE 



INVOCATION BY 

REV. THOMAS NELSON BAKER 

OF THE SECOND CHURCH 

O God, our Father, we thank Thee for this time 
when we can remember that for a period of one 
hundred and fifty years Thou hast been making good 
Thy promise to build here Thy Church against which 
the gates of hell shall not prevail. We thank Thee 
for the men and the women who have given Thee 
their lives in which to build their Church. We thank 
Thee for the children of these fathers and mothers, 
who, generation after generation, have been giving 
their lives to Thee in which to build Thy Church. We 
thank Thee, O God, for the spirit of helpfulness that 
has pervaded the life of this Church from the begin- 
ning until now. We thank Thee for the healthy spir- 
itual condition of the Church at this time, at the age 
of one hundred and fifty years. We thank Thee, O 
God, for the hopeful outlook. We thank Thee for all 
the noble souls who have given themselves here as 
Thy servants : who stand and make it their own busi- 
ness to make men remember that their citizenship is 
not only of this world but in heaven. 

O God, our Father, as we recount the great deeds 
that have been wrought by the great souls here, and 
remember the great good that has been done, help 
us to remember that except Jehovah build the house, 
they labor in vain that build it. Help us to remember 



126 

that whatever worth while has been accomplished 
here through these years has been accomplished not 
by might nor by power, but by Thy spirit. 

And O God, we pray Thee that after having 
listened to the great deeds of the great souls who have 
wrought and worked here for Thee, we all together 
shall end with the disciples upon the mount, where 
we shall see Jesus only, and where we shall hear Thy 
voice saying unto us, " This is my beloved son in 
whom I am well pleased. Hear ye Him." And help 
us, O God, to hear Him, and may this Church be 
a place in which the Spirit of God may have His right 
of way in the lives of the children of those who have 
gone before, and that great good may be done, to the 
glory of Thy name and to the salvation of the souls 
of men. Amen. 



PRAYER BY REV. WARREN S. ARCHIBALD 
OF THE PILGRIM MEMORIAL CHURCH 

Infinite Father, Father of all men and of the Lord 
Jesus Christ, Thou art worthy to be praised with all 
glory and honor and power, for Thou hast lifted up 
around us the magic and the mystery of the day. 
Thou hast covered the day with night, and crowned it 
with the glory of the stars; Thou hast prepared for 
us, children of the day, a way through the day and 
night, far beyond the sun and stars, even the way of 
our Lord Jesus Christ, unto whom be the glory and 
the power and the dominion and the beauty of holiness 
both now and forever more. 

Infinite Father, as we lift up to Thee our prayer, 
we praise Thee for the Puritan and the Puritan 
Church, for the men in all centuries who have left 



127 

their country and have gone in search of a far country, 
that is, an heavenly one. We praise Thee and v^e mag- 
nify Thy name for the men who in perils manifold 
crossed the hungry seas, and established a Church in 
liberty in this new world. We praise Thee for the men 
who levelled these forests, cleared these fields, and 
planted a Commonwealth and a Church. We praise 
Thee and we magnify Thy name for the brave women 
who in starry solitude, in strange dangers, and in heavy 
toil reared up godly families and noble and beautiful 
households. The wilderness and the solitary places 
have been made glad by them. We praise Thee 
and we bless Thee for this heritage, the Church 
of the Puritans and the prophets, who have resisted 
unto blood King and Emperor, Pope and Bishop, 
and the mobs of men, in order that Thy liberty and 
Thy righteousness might be established upon earth. 
God of the fathers, be Thou with the sons of the 
fathers. God of the nations, be Thou with the 
sons and daughters of the nation. God of the 
Church of Christ, Thou who hast blessed the Church 
in the past, we beseech Thee, bless the Church of 
the Puritan in the years to come. Ennoble the 
Church ; enable her to endure hardness like a good 
soldier of the Lord Jesus Christ. So discipline her, 
so restrain her, so govern her, that she may be fitted 
like a good sword to Thy right hand. Even so, Lord 
Jesus Christ, arise, shine, let the enemies of Thy 
Church be scattered. Ennoble Thy members, so that 
they may fight like good soldiers; so that they may 
dash in pieces like a potter's vessel the injustice, the 
oppression, the tyranny of the times. Glorify Thy 
Church, Lord Jesus Christ. Hear us, as with trem- 
bling, with reverence, and with fear we pray that the 
glory of the cross may be the glory of the Church. We 



128 

pray for the fellowship of Thy suffering, we pray for 
the fellowship of Thy cross, we pray for the austerity 
of a pure life. Sanctify Thy Church, O Lord Jesus 
Christ, so that we, casting aside every weight and 
looking eagerly into the wide years, may truly see that 
we are pilgrims and sojourners here as all our fathers 
were. Open our eyes to see that holy city which hath 
foundations. Open our eyes to see that unseen com- 
panion, who walks beside us on the road, until our 
hearts burn within us, and the Scriptures are opened 
to our understanding. Even so come, Lord Jesus. 
Enter into Thy Church. Purify our hearts until we 
see Thee. Open these windows and these doors until 
the vista rolls before us of a Church which is eternal 
and against which not even hell can prevail. Even so 
come. Lord Jesus Christ. Breathe Thy Holy Spirit 
into all the members of this body, this society of Thine, 
until the Church shall be the mystic body of the Lord 
Jesus Christ. Even so. Lord Jesus, come. Amen. 



ADDRESS BY THE PASTOR 

In St. Paul's second letter to the Church at 
Corinth, the eighth chapter, the fifth verse, we read: 
"And this they did, not as we hoped, but first gave 
their own selves to the Lord, and unto us by the 
will of God." 

From this text, one hundred and fifty years ago. Rev- 
Samuel Hopkins of Great Barrington, preached the 
"lecture," as it was called, which followed the organiza- 
tion of this Church ; the meeting for organization hav- 
ing been held in the house of Deacon Stephen Crofut, 
and the lecture being given in the meeting house just 
after. And after this lecture, the eight foundation 



129 

men whose names you read to-night upon the shields 
on either side of this house along the gallery rail, — 
these eight foundation men were declared to be a 
Church of Christ. Those same words of St. Paul 
I would leave with you to-night. 

" First they gave their own selves to the Lord." 
There you have the secret of any Church's success. 
It makes no diflference whether the Church is great 
or small, it makes no difference in what country the 
Church happens to be, it makes no difference what its 
denomination may be: the secret of its success or of 
its failure as a Church of Christ depends exactly and 
precisely and eternally upon whether or not its mem- 
bers have given themselves first to the Lord. 

There are a good many things which men and 
women would rather give first to the Lord. They 
would rather give their money. We sometimes think 
that people are not specially willing to give their 
money, or specially willing to give it to the Lord even 
if they are willing to give it otherwise, but they are. 
They are giving it continually. They are giving it 
in Pittsfield. They are giving it in the form of pew- 
rent, and they are giving it in the form of contribu- 
tions to the House of Mercy and the Associated Char- 
ities and the Day Nursery and a dozen other worthy 
and good causes. They are giving it for foreign mis- 
sions and for home missions. They are giving their 
money and they are giving it with surprising gen- 
erosity, but a good many of these same people have 
not yet given themselves with their gifts. They are 
willing to give their money to the Lord through all 
these channels, but when it comes to themselves, that 
is a very different and a far harder thing to do. 

And people are ready to give their time and their 
strength to the good causes which are promoting the 



130 

coming of God's Kingdom. They are willing to help 
in those ways often because they see others doing 
the same. They say they believe in the Church and 
they are willing to back it up, and they do, in large 
measure; but when you bring them face to face with 
the searching personal question, they are not ready 
to admit that they have given themselves to the Lord. 

" Son, give me thine heart." That is the desire 
of the Lord Christ. That is the longing of God, the 
Father in Heaven, toward every one of his children. 
Think not that you can satisfy God any more than 
you can satisfy your own father or your own mother 
with any lesser gift than the gift of your own love 
and your own loyalty and your own self. 

That, I say, is the secret of any and every Church's 
success. It is the secret of whatever glory this Church 
may have won in the past. It will be the secret and 
the cause of whatever glory and success and prosperity 
this Church may have in the days to come. Nay, 
further, this is the secret of success eternally for every 
human soul, for every man and every woman in this 
room. " First they gave their own selves to the 
Lord " ; not " second," but " first." How true is it 
of us to-night? How true shall it be of the Church 
of Christ in Pittsfield, — well represented, I think, by 
this congregation. Not the First Church only, not the 
First Methodist or the First Baptist or St. Stephen's 
or any other of the different organizations which 
we speak of day by day, but the whole Church of 
Christ in Pittsfield, Protestant and Roman and all. 
Shall the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ be true 
to Him? It will depend wholly upon whether the 
members of His Church first have given themselves 
to Him. 



131 



God grant that we may make it true of ourselves 
this night. Amen. 



CLOSING PRAiYER 

Almighty God, our eternal Father, we thank and 
praise Thee for the Church of Christ in this town. 
We thank and praise Thee for that which it hath 
been under Thy providence and under Thy blessing 
in the years that are past. We trust Thee to be to 
us in the years to come our God, our Father, and our 
Friend, still. O Lord, our God, our fathers' God, 
grant, we beseech Thee, that the Church of Christ in 
this town may be, with every year that passes, more 
truly One Church ; that the unity of Thy spirit which 
is the bond of peace may be made manifest and mighty 
among us ; and that together, in loyalty to the name of 
Jesus, we may seek to know and to do His will in this 
community. So let Thy blessing abide with us now 
and evermore; Amen. 



THE MEMORIAL PORTRAIT 
GALLERY 



Of great interest was the collection of the portraits 
of men and women who had gone to their reward 
and had from time to time been members of the 
Church, or had worshipped in its several meeting 
houses. Most generous and prompt was the response 
of the townspeople to requests made for the loan of 
pictures ; and hundreds of citizens besides our invited 
guests lingered for a while, and then returned many- 
times to look at the pictures of those who in days that 
are gone had gathered in this historic church, and 
many of whom had labored with unceasing zeal in 
the Master's vineyard. No more appropriate part of 
the One Hundred and Fiftieth Celebration could have 
been undertaken than the memorial portrait-gallery; 
and while the work of the present-day Church should 
be aggressive and onward, still anniversary celebra- 
tions would fail in their mission, if we did not stop 
and consider the helpful influence, the unbounded 
loyalty, the devoted service and the earnest, conse- 
crated lives, that have been the heritage of our Church 
from those who have been members or worshippers 
within its walls. Many of the subjects of the portraits 
were not only active in the Church, but foremost in 
the work and life of the old town; and builded well 
the foundations of our present beautiful city. Many 
portraits were of those who in a quiet way had re- 
garded the First Church as their religious home ; and 
while perhaps not active members, still had a part in 
the Church's history. Some were but slightly con- 



134 

nected with the parish. Other pictures recalled those 
who had gone out from the Church into other fields 
and had labored long and faithfully until called to 
their reward. 

Grouped on the south wall of the prayer meeting 
room, were the portraits, (so far as it was possible 
to obtain them) of former pastors and ministers who 
have been prominent in the religious Hfe of the County. 

This group included Rev. Thomas Allen; his son 
and successor Rev. William Allen, D. D. ; Rev. Heman 
Humphrey, D. D., the third pastor; Rev. Henry P. 
Tappan, D. D., the fifth pastor; Rev. John Todd, 
D. D., the eighth pastor; Rev. Edward O. Bartlett, 
the ninth pastor ; Rev. Jonathan L. Jenkins, D. D., the 
tenth pastor, who was serving the Church at the time 
of the One Hundred and Twenty-fifth Anniversary 
celebration in 1889; and Rev. William Vail Wilson 
Davis, D. D., the eleventh pastor, who died in 1910. 
There were also portraits of Dr. Stephen West of 
Stockbridge, who took part in the organization of this 
Church; Rev. Joab Brace, D. D., the father-in-law 
of Rev. Dr. Todd ; Rev. Alvan Hyde, who was pastor 
of the Church at Lee from 1792 until 1833 ; and near 
by was the portrait of Rev. Solomon Allen, pastor of 
the Church at Brighton, N. Y., who often preached in 
the Pittsfield church, and was the brother of Rev. 
Thomas Allen and the father of Phinehas Allen, the 
founder of the Pittsfield Sun. 

The portraits were artistically arranged on the 
walls of the prayer meeting room and parlor; their 
presence brought forth many expressions of feeling 
and many were the reminiscences and bits of history 
unfolded, until it almost seemed as though the good 
people represented by the portraits were here once 
again and helping us celebrate the One Hundred and 
Fiftieth Anniversary of the founding of the Church. 



135 



Below will be found a catalogue, as nearly complete 
as could be made, of those whose portraits were con- 
tributed, with the dates of their birth and death. 



Adam, Robert William 1825-1911 

Allen, Rev. Thomas (First Minister) 1743-1810 

Allen, Rev. William (Second Minister) 1784-1868 

Allen, Rev. Solomon 1751-1821 

Allen, Phinehas 1776-1868 

Allen, Fanny Tileston Clapp (Mrs. Phinehas) 1801-1891 

Allen, Phinehas, 2nd 1807-1873 

Allen, Maria Clapp (Mrs. Phinehas, 2nd) 1807- 1866 

Allen, Thomas 1813-1882 

Allen, Ann Russell (Mrs. Thomas) 1823-1897 

Allen, Jonathan, 2nd 1786-1866 

Atwater, Charles 1857-1900 

Axtell, Harriet Dickinson (Mrs. William D.) 1821-1898 



Bacon, Ezekiel 1776- 

Bacon, Abigail S. (Mrs. Ezekiel) 1775- 

Bailey, Dr. Charles 1818- 

Bailey, Caroline W. Goodrich (Mrs. Charles) 1822- 

Bagg. Martin, ist 1745- 

Bagg, Clarissa Newton (Mrs. Jedediah) 1800- 

Barber, Emily G. Dyer (Mrs. Jerijah Morton) 1835- 

Barker, Otis R. 181 1- 

Barker, Electa T. (Mrs. Otis R.) 1818- 

Barker, John Vandeburgh 1807- 

Barker, Sarah A. (Mrs. John V.) 1810- 

Barker, Judge James Madison 1839- 
Barker, Helena Whiting (Mrs. James Madison) 1843- 

Barrett, Jedediah Foster 1819- 

Bartlett, Rev. Edward O. (Ninth Minister) 1835- 

Beers, Mrs. Martha 1832- 

Bissell, Sarah S. 1855- 

Brace, Rev. Dr. Joab 1777- 

Brewster, Dr. Oliver E. 1816- 

Brewster, Clarissa A. Allen (Mrs. O. E.) 1816- 

Brewster, Edward S. 1842- 

Brewster, Martha, 1848- 

Brewster, Mrs. John M. 1787- 

Brown, Henry Clinton 1779- 

Brown, Mary Kilborn (Mrs. H. C.) 1788- 

Brown, Agnes Center Buell (Mrs. George W.) 1815- 

Brown, Nathan Gallup, 1818- 

Brown, Sarah Ann (Mrs. N. G.) 1823- 

Buell, James 1784- 

Buell, Agnes Center (Mrs. James) 1784- 

Burd, Sarah C. (Mrs. Charles G.) 1875- 



870 
861 
895 
899 
824 
867 
904 
904 
902 
896 
853 
905 
889 
905 
909 
907 
904 

857 
866 
906 
865 
889 
876 
838 
876 
908 
884 
890 

874 
864 
911 



136 

Campbell, George W. 1804-1880 

Campbell, Harriet Pomeroy Atwater (Mrs. 

George W.) 
Campbell, Luc}^ Laflin 
Campbell, Dr. Robert 
Campbell, George 

Campbell, Matilda Jenkins (Mrs. George) 
Campbell, Abby M. 
Campbell, Mary Emmes 
Carter, Josiah 

Carter, Julia Fenn (Mrs. Josiah) 
Carter, Mary P. 
Carter, Stella A. 
Clapp, Jason 

Clapp, Cecilia Eldridge Luce (Mrs. Jason) 
Clapp, Edwin 
Clapp, Lyman 
Clapp, Colonel Thaddeus 
Clapp, Elizabeth Campbell (Mrs. Thaddeus) 
Clapp, Thaddeus 

Clapp, Lucy P. Goodrich (Mrs. Thaddeus) 
Clark, Rev. Solomon 

Clark, Lucy E. Richards (Mrs. Solomon) 
Chapin, Mrs. David 
Clary, David A. 
Chickering, Benjamin 

Chickering, Louisa G. Baldwin (Mrs. Benjamin) 
Chickering, Elvira P. Allen (Mrs. Henry) 
Childs, Dr. Henry H. 
Colt, Ezekiel Root 
Colt, Electa Campbell (Mrs. E. R.) 
Colt, James D., 2nd 
Colt, Sarah Root (Mrs. J. D., 2nd) 
Colt, James D., 3rd 
Colt, James D., 4th 
Colt, Henry 

Colt, Elizabeth Goldthwait (Mrs. Henry) 
Colt, William Francis 
Colt, Alice O. (Mrs. William Francis) 
Colt, Robert 

Colt, Catherine M. Cooley (Mrs. Thomas G.) 
Converse, Matilda Shumway (Mrs. Everett H.) 
Collins, Dwight M. 
Cooley, William B. 

Cooley, Mary Ann Spellman (Mrs. W. B.) 
Cooley, Mary J. 

Cooley, Abbie L. Goodrich (Mrs. William H.) 
Crosby, John 
Crosby, Annie M. 



1822- 


[912 


1763- 


1852 


i7QS- 


1866 


1811- 


[878 


1814- 


[882 


1837- 


[903 


1851- 


[899 


1819- 


[906 


1825- 


[913 


1850- 


[901 


1854- 


[909 


1782- 


[868 


1800- 


[873 


1809- 


[884 


1811- 


[8S3 


1792- 


[865 


1796- 


[88i 


1821- 


[890 


1825- 


[908 


1811- 


[902 


1820- 


[903 


1809- 


[890 


1824- 


[891 


1824- 


[889 


1816-] 


[863 


1812- 


[893 


1783-] 


[868 


1794- 


[860 


1793-1 


t875 


1768- ] 


[856 


1771-1 


[865 


I 797-1 


[822 


1819-1 


[881 


1812-] 


[888 


1812-] 


[890 


1 848-] 


t883 


1852-1 


909 


1807-1 


[864 


1828- 1 


897 


1840-1 


911 


1833-1 


912 


1800-1 


870 


1802-1 


[895 


1833-1 


913 


1840-1 


907 


1 829-] 


902 


1862- 1 


900 



137 



Dawes, Hon. Henry Laurens 

Dawes, Electa Sanderson (Mrs. H. L.) 

Davis. Rev. William Vail Wilson, D. D., (Eleventh 

Minister) 
Davis, Rebecca Frances Stearns (Mrs. W. V. W.) 
Davis, Henry G. 

Davis, Mary B. Dowse (Airs. H. G.) 
Davenport, Helen B. (Mrs. Robert H.) 
Dewey, Erastus 

Dewey, Alatilda M. (Mrs. Erastus) 
Dickinson, John 
Dickinson, Mrs. Oliver P. 
Dunham, James H. 
Dunham, Jarvis N. 
Dutton, George N. 
Dyer, Alfred T. 
Dyer, Emily C. (Mrs. Alfred T.) 

Eaton, Frances M. (Mrs. Arthur W. 

Fairbanks, Jabez Wilder 

Fairbanks, Harriet Stocking (Mrs. J. W.) 

Fenn, Curtis T. 

Fenn, Parthenia Dickinson (Mrs. C. T.) 

Ferrey, Moses H. 

Ferrey, Mrs. Moses H. 

French, Alice G. 

Fletcher, Rebecca Morrison Hunter (Mrs. A. M.) 

Foxcroft, Mrs. George A. 

Foote, Mary Dewey 

Gamwell, Lorenzo H. 

Gamwell, Emeline A. Varney (Mrs. Lorenzo) 

Gamwell, William W. 

Gleason, Monroe 

Goodman, William W. 

Goodman, Mary E. Jones (Mrs. W. W.) 

Goodman, Deacon Titus 

Goodman, Clarissa 

Goodrich, Levi Weight 

Goodrich, Abigail P. (Mrs. Noah W.) 

Guilds, Gerry 

Guilds, Jane Horner (Mrs. Gerry) 

Haight, Ellen L. Gleason (Mrs. Jonathan) 

Harding, William Greenough 

Harding, Nancy Pepoon Campbell (Mrs. W. G.) 

Hawkins, William J. 

Hibbard, Fred W. 

Hinsdale, James H. 

Hinsdale, Mary Livingston Gilbert (Mrs. J. H.) 

Hinsdale, Frank W. 



I8I6- 


1903 


1822- 


1 901 


I85I- 


I9I0 


1848- 


1907 


I82I- 


1863 


1825- 


1900 


1878- 


1908 


1789- 


1865 


1795- 


1865 


1769- 


1855 


1766- 


1847 


1803- 


1890 


1828- 


1 891 


1828- 


1 891 


1840- 


1906 


1840- 


1897 


1855- 


1909 


1803- 


1872 


I8I2- 


1897 


1792- 


I87I 


1798- 


1878 


I8I3- 


1878 


I8I3- 


1893 


1868- 


1909 


1865- 


I9II 


I8I8- 


1894 


1833- 


1873 


I82I- 


1896 


I8I9- 


1908 


1850- 


I9I3 


I8I4- 


1898 


I8I4- 


I86I 


I8I8- 


1893 


1785- 


1857 


1785- 


1868 


I8I3- 


I89I 


I8I2- 


1872 


I8I5- 


1896 


1853- 


1894 


1834- 


1908 


1839- 


1874 


1836- 


1878 


1873- 


1903 


1833- 


I9I2 


1848- 


I9I2 


1826- 


1906 



138 

Hinsdale, Judge Theodore 1772-1855 

Hinsdale, Nancy 1769-1851 

Hulbert, Charles 1825-1875 

Hulbert, Fanny Dunham (Mrs. Charles) 1818-1900 

Hulbert, Maria P. 1856-1905 

Hull, James Wells 1842-1911 

Hull, Mary Griffith (Mrs. Oliver S.) 1803-1883 

Hull, Isaac Griffith 1827-1913 

Hurd, Mrs. H. M. 1815-1895 

Hubbard, William 1801-1868 

Hubbard, Mary Warner (Mrs. William) 1807-1887 

Humphrey, Rev. Heman (Third Minister) 1779-1861 
Hyde, Rev. Alvan, D. D. (Minister at Lee, Mass.) 1768-1833 

Janes, Colonel Ethan 1784- 1865 
Jenkins, Rev. Jonathan L., D. D. (Tenth Min- 
ister of Church) 1830-1913 

Kellogg, Ensign H. 1812-1882 

Kellogg, Caroline L. Campbell (Mrs. E. H.) 1814-1908 

Kellogg, Austin W. 1820-1885 

Kennedy, Isaac C. 1824-1898 

Kennedy, Mrs. Isaac C. 1822-1906 

Lane, Mrs. Maria Peck 1830- 1898 

Lane, John Peck 1853-1893 

Loop, Carrie Carter (Mrs. A. A.) 1847- 1892 

Maclnnes, Annie Adriance (Mrs. W. D.) 1864-1912 

Martin, Calvin 1787-1867 

Martin, Calvin G. 1820- 1842 

Martin, George C. 1827-1859 

Merrill, Captain Hosea 1761-1853 

Merrill, Sarah Phillips (Mrs. Hosea) 1763-1850 

Merrill, Phillips 1790-1873 

Merrill, Frances A. Stanton (Mrs. Phillips) 1794-1867 

Morey, Daniel C. 1814-1896 

Morey, Rebecca M. Mattison (Mrs. D. C.) 1817-1880 

Newton, Edward A. 1785-1862 

Paddock, Dr. Franklin Kittredge 1841-1901 

Paddock, Frank Eugene 1876-1892 

Parker, John Churchill 1822- 1881 

Parker, Lydia Goodrich (Mrs. John C.) 1823- 1912 

Parker, Linus 1790-1872 

Parker, Sophia Churchill (Mrs. Linus) 1792-1872 

Partridge, John 1804-1870 

Partridge, Mrs. John 1815-1875 

Partridge, James H. 1810-1895 

Partridge, Olcott O. 1873-1912 

Paul, Miss Anna Maria 1816-1911 



139 

Peck, Otis 1795-1874 

Peck, Mrs. Otis 1800-1872 

Peck, Frederick C. 1830-1910 

Peck, Mrs. F. C. 1840-1875 

Peck, Martha A. 1834- 1897 

Peck, Jabez L. 1826-1895 

Peck, Henry Oliver 1895-1912 

Pingree, Thomas Perkins 1829- 1895 

Plunkett, Thomas F. 1804-1875 

Plunkett, Harriet Merrick Hodge (Mrs. T. F.) 1826-1906 

Plunkett, William R. 1831-1903 

Plunkett, May Kellogg (Mrs. W. R.) 1848-1881 

Pomeroy, Lemuel 1778-1849 

Pomeroy, Theodore 1813-1881 

Pomeroy, Fanny S. (Mrs. Theodore) 1814-1851 

Pomeroy, Mary Harris (Mrs. Theodore) 1826- 1863 

Pomeroy, Edward 1820-1889 

Pomeroy, Robert 1817-1889 

Pomeroy, Mary Center (Mrs. Robert) 1820-1889 

Power, John T. 1844- 1890 

Redfield, Charles B. 1818-1876 

Redfield, Mary A. Wallace (Mrs. C B.) 1826-1913 

Robbins, Oliver W. 1812-1899 

Robbins, Mrs. Oliver W. 1815-1911 

Robinson, Deacon William 1810-1902 

Rockwell, Judge Julius 1804-1888 

Rockwell, Elizabeth 1888-1911 

Root, Washington M. 1823-1884 

Root, Mrs. Washington M. 1827-1869 

Root, Graham 1820-1880 

Root, Dr. Oliver S. 1799-1870 

Root, Henry 1784-1863 

Root, Thankful Johnson (Mrs. Henry) 1785-1865 

Russell, Solomon L. 1791-1882 

Russell, Solomon N. 1822-1899 

Russell, Franklin W. 1841-1908 

Russell, Zeno 1834-1881 

Russell, Charlotte M. Rice (Mrs. Zeno) 1835-1903 

Russell, Frank 1857-1908 

Russell, Solomon Clark 1887- 1900 

Russell, Mary 1828-1862 

Russell, Lucy Maria 1807- 1884 

Saunders, Anna Goodrich (Mrs. Edwin) 1820- 1887 

Sears, James 1818-1897 

Sears, Lydia C. Merrill (Mrs. James) 1822- 1897 

Shaw, Henry 1788-1857 

Spear, Rev. C. V. 1825-1891 

Spear, Relief L. (Mrs. C. V.) 1824-1883 

Spear, Esther Dyer (Mrs. Nathaniel) 

Sprague, Minnie Lane (Mrs. F. E.) 1861-1907 

Stearns, Miss Eliza 1833-1906 



140 

Stevenson, Sarah H. (Mrs. John M.) 
Strong, Thomas Barnard 
Strong, Charles W. 
Strong, Mrs. Charles W. 

Taft, Henry W. 

Talcott, WilHam H. 

Tappan, Rev. Henry (Fifth Minister) 

Taylor, Thomas 

Taylor, Lewis W. 

Taylor, Eliza 

Teeling, William H. 

Teeling, Elizabeth German (Mrs. W. H.) 

Todd, Rev. John, D. D. (Eighth Minister) 

Todd, Mary Brace (Mrs. John) 

Tucker, Judge Joseph 

Walker, John A. 

Walker, William M. 

Walker, Mrs. William M. 

Warriner, James 

Warriner, John R. 

Warriner, James L. 

Warner, Thomas 

Warner, Miss Sophia S. 

Weed, Sarah Russell 

Wells, Clara 

Wells, Harriet Edna Murray (Mrs. William M.) 

Werden, Amy A. Paul (Mrs. Elias) 

Werden, Mary 

West, Rev. Stephen, D. D. (Pastor at Stock- 
bridge) 

West, Abel 

West, Matilda Thompson (Mrs. Abel) 

West, Dr. Charles E. 

West, John C. 

West, Lydia Maria Goodrich (Mrs. John C.) 

West, Mary Elizabeth Goodrich (Mrs. Gilbert) 

West, William Bagg 

West, Jessie Campbell (Mrs. John K.) 

White, Elizabeth (Mrs. William P.), daughter 
of Rev. T. Allen 

Whitney, Mercy Partridge 

Whittlesey, William A. 

Whittlesey, Russell 

Wilcox, Nancy Bradley (Mrs. Marshall) 

Willis, Gen. Nathan 

Willis, Lucy Fearing (Mrs. Nathan) 

Willis, William Henry 

Wilson, Solomon L. 

Wilson, Mrs. Solomon L. 

Williams, Lucretia (Mrs. John Chandler) 

Wood, Moses H. 



1823- 


1908 


1780- 


1863 


1840- 


1906 


1844- 


1911 


I8I8- 


1904 


1876- 


1912 


I80S- 


1880 


1793- 


1875 


1822- 


1897 


1805- 


1883 


1820- 


1900 


1823- 


igo6 


1800- 


1873 


1809- 


1889 


1832- 


1907 


I82I- 


1864 


I8I0- 


1870 


I8I3- 


1883 


1797- 


1865 


1827- 


1888 


1829- 


1898 


1774- 


1864 


1806- 


1858 


1828- 


1912 


1820- 


1873 


1834- 


1911 


1822- 


1905 


1857- 


1912 


1735- 


1819 


1780- 


1871 


1782- 


1866 


1809- 


1900 


1811- 


1893 


1816- 


1895 


1826- 


1913 


1852- 


1913 


1849- 


1903 


1775- 


1798 


1795- 


1872 


1849- 


1906 


1887- 


1911 


1825- 


1911 


1763- 


185 1 


1774- 


i860 


1819- 


1882 


1810- 


1891 


1753- 


1834 


1822- 


1913 



THE PAGEANT 



PRELUDE 



THE SPIRIT OF THE HILLS. 

An Indian call is heard in the distance followed 
by a soft crooning melody drawing nearer and nearer, 
and an Indian warrior enters led by the Spirit of the 
Hills. Enter the Spirit of Religion. She bears a torch 
in one hand and a Bible in the other. Placing the 
open Bible before the Indian, she points to it as though 
explaining its teachings. The Indian raises the Book 
and as she points upward and onward he turns and 
follows her. 

PART ONE 

EARLY DAYS 

Recitative — The Spirit of the Hills. 

Episode i — The Coming of the Pioneer Settlers, 1752. 

Interlude — The Spirit of the Hills. 

Episode 2 — A Gathering of the People to consider the 
building of a Meeting House. 

Episode 3 — Conversation between Deacon Crofoot and 
Mrs. Aaron Baker. 

Interlude — The Spirit of the Hills. 

Episode 4 — The Founding of the Church. The Spirit 
of Religion, the Foundation Men, the Coming of 
Parson Allen. 

Interlude — The Call to Arms. 

Episode 5 — The March to Bennington. 



142 

PART TWO 

NINETEENTH CENTURY DAYS 

Episode i — The Choir of the First Church in 1823. 
Interlude — The Stone Church. 
Episode 2 — The Sunday School in the Fifties. 
Episode 3 — A Free Will Meeting in the Sixties. 
Episode 4 — After the Sunrise Prayer Meeting. 

PART THREE 

THE twentieth CENTURY 

Interlude — The Spirit of the Hills. 

Episode i — The Mission Band on the way to a meet- 
ing. 
Episode 2 — The Knights of King Arthur. 

Finale — The Spirit of Religion leads onward and up- 
ward. Singing of "Onward, Christian Soldiers" 
by all. 



PARTICIPANTS 

The Spirit of the Hills Miss Elsa MacLaren Eager 

The Spirit of Religion Miss Wilcox 

The Indian Mr. Anthony Reese 

Early Settlers 

Daniel Hubbard Mr. R. P. Parker 

Stephen Crof oot Mr. A. H. Wood 

Jesse Sackett Mr. P. Doremus 

Nathaniel Fairfield Mr. J. Yohannan 

Solomon Deming Mr. L. M. Cain 

The Deming Family Mrs. Cain and Children 

Foundation Men 

Stephen Crofoot Mr. A. H. Wood 

Ephraim Stiles Mr. J. J. Frank 



143 

Daniel Hubbard Mr. R. P. Parker 

Aaron Baker Mr. C. W. Power 

Jacob Ensign Dr. Kinnell 

William Phelps Mr. S. G. Colt 

Lemuel Phelps Mr. L. M. Cain 

Elnathan Phelps Mr. H. W. Andrews 

Townspeople 

Mesdames Wood, Cain, Whittlesey; the Misses Wilcox, 
Sylvester, Wood, Mawhinney; Messrs. Wraught, Turner, 
VanderWater, Fletcher, G. E. Whittlesey, Plumb, Maclnnes. 
Parson Allen Mr. M. D. Steever. 

The Choir 

Mrs. W. E. Bagg, Mrs. Trowbridge, Miss Walbridge, Miss 
Chesney; Messrs. C. E. West, Francis, Bradford West, Orr. 

The Sunday School 

Mr. F. T. West, Mrs. Collins, the Misses Thomson, John- 
son, Chaflfee, Priscilla Colt, Marion Spall, Mabel Rawlings, 
Elizabeth and Jeannette Hover, Marion Sargent, Ruth Hunt, 
Lena Bouteiller, Beatrice Faulkner, Mary Reid, Dorothy 
French, Minnie Dorgan, Alice Crawford, Doris Turner, 
Charles Bouteiller, Zenas Colt, Albert Williams, Douglas 
Smith, Jack Barker, Edward Spall, Frederick Francis, Jennie 
Burt, Helen Martineau, Marguerite Sargent, Grace Sargent. 

The Ladies of the Free Will 

Mesdames Trowbridge, Rockwell, C. L. HIbbard, F. T. 
Francis, Willard, C. W. Power, Chafifee; the Misses Peck, 
Ballard, Blatchford, Turner, Colt, Wellington. 

The Gentlemen 

Messrs. Lawrence, C. E. West, Adam, W. A. Whittlesey, 
M. S. Wellington, John Power, Colville Vance. 

The Mission Band 

Caroline Chaffee, Alice Steele, Wendell Harrington, 
Beulah Coleman, Ruth Jones, Margaret Kinnell, Helen Jenks, 
Lena Bouteiller, Annie Stronach, Georgiana Crawford, Edna 
Abbott, Margaret Barnes. 



144 

Knights of King Arthur 

John Frank, George Kinnell, David Kinnell, Lincoln 
Cain, John Power, James Colt, Charles Hibbard, Whitmore 
Parker, George Seager, William Barnes, Alden Sampson, 
Colville Vance, Norman Blanchard, Allen Davis, Kenneth 
Williams, Maxfield Smith, Jack Brackin, George Dutton, 
Jairus Burt. 



SPECIAL COMMITTEES 

FINANCE 

Messrs. Joseph F. Titus, Chairman; Henry Colt, M. D., 
Frank W. Dutton, Irving D. Ferrey, Charles E. Hibbard, Al- 
exander Kennedy, Henry R. Russell, George H. Tucker, 
Hiram B. Wellington, William D. Wyman. 

INVITATIONS 

Edward T Slocum, Esq., Chairman ; Miss Anna L. Dawes, 
Mrs. James W. Hull, Miss Lucy H. Neill, Mrs. John M. 
Stevenson, Mr. Harlan H. Ballard, Mr. Robert H. Davenport, 
Mr. William D. Goodwin, Mr. E. Archie Jones. 

ENTERTAINMENT 

Mr. Charles H. Wilson, Chairman; Mrs. William L. 
Adam, Mrs. Robert P. Parker, Miss Jane A. Russell, Mr. 
Carl B. Lindholm, Mr. Loring G. Robbins. 

SUPPER 

Mrs. Harry G. West, Chairman; Mrs. John Barker, Mrs. 
William J. Baughman, Mrs. William H. Hall, Mrs. Edward 
N. Huntress, Mrs. Edgar T. Lawrence, Miss Mabel I. Mills, 
Mrs. John B. Thomes, Miss Adelaide L. Waite, Miss Edith 
A. Waite. 

PAGEANT 

Miss Frances D. Robbins, Chairman; Miss Frances G. 
Colt, Miss Marjorie T. Gregg, Mrs. Pomeroy W. Power, 
Mrs. George H. Southard, Mrs. Miller D. Steever, Miss Char- 
lotte R. Titus, Miss Lucy D. Thomson, Mrs. Robert K. Wil- 
lard, Mr. Irvin P. Thompson, Mr. Charles E. West. 



145 

DECORATION 

Miss Caroline S. Tucker, Chairman; Miss Fanny E. Colt, 
Miss Martha G. B. Clapp, Mr. Arthur N. Cooley, Mr. George 
C. Harding. 

MUSIC 

Mr. Frank D. Taylor, Chairman; Miss Mary A. Bissell, 
Mrs. Dwight M. Collins, Mrs. Charles L. Hibbard, Mr. Clif- 
ford Francis, Mr. Thomas F. Plunkett. 

PORTRAITS 

Mrs. Allen H. Bagg, Chairman; Mrs. Charles E. West, 
Miss Ara West, Mrs. William C. Stevenson, Miss Sara S. 
Tucker, Mr. Allen H. Bagg. 

USHERING 

Messrs. Frank R. Whittlesey, Chairman; Reginald M. 
Wentworth, Edward G. Guilds, Nelson A. Foote, Ralph D. 
Head, M. D., John I. Olney, L. Pomeroy Russell. 

LITERARY PROGRAM 

Mr. William L. Adam, Chairman ; Mrs. Frank K. Paddock, 
Rev. James E. Gregg. 



INDEX 



NoTK. — In this index the names in the list of 
the Memorial Portrait Gallery are not included. 



Abbate, P. L., 11 

Adam, R. W., 16. 67, 87 

W. L., 5, 9, 28 

"Administration of College Cur- 
riculum, The," 80 
Allen, Betty, 69 
" Phinehas, 134 
Rev. Solomon, 134 
" Rev. Thomas. 

15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 

34, 37, 67, 68, 69, 71, 72, 

73, 74, 75, 134, 141 

" Thomas, Jr., 70 

" Mrs. Thomas, Jr., 70 

" Rev. William, 19, 20, 21, 

36, 68, 69, 71, 72, 73, 134 

Amherst College. 6 

Collegiate Institute, 79 

Congregational Church, 

25 
American Board. 76 

American Sunday School Union, 79 
Archibald, Rev. W. S., 11, 126 



Bailey, Rev. R. W., 


22 


, 64 


Baker, Aaron. 16 


, 67 


, 68 


" Mrs. Aaron, 


68, 


141 


Rev. T. Nelson. 


11, 


125 


Ballard. Rev. Dr. Addison, 




7 


Barker, James M., 




29 


Barkers, the. 




87 


Bartlett, Rev. Edward 0., 


25, 


134 


Beecher, Lyman, 




96 


Berkshire Inn, 




82 


Bidwell, Rev. Adonijah, 




18 


Bouteiller. A. C, 




10 


Bowdoin College, 




6 


Brace, Rev. Joab, 




134 


Brewster, Henry A., 




5 


Br'ggs. General, 




42 


Brinsmade, Rev. Horatio N, 


„ 2£ 


;, 64 


Bulfinch, Charles. 




28 


Burd, Rev. Charles G., 


10, 


111 



Calkins, Rev. Raymond, 

9, 89, 93, 109 

Catlin. Rev. Mr.. 36 

Cherokee Indians, 77, 78 

Child, Dr., 81 

Choctaw Indians, 77, 78 



Chorus. 10 

Collins, Rev. Daniel, 36 

Collier's Weekly, 103 

Colt, Dr. Henry, 7, 13 

Colts, the, 87 

Committee, General, 5 

Committees, special, 144, 145 

Communion service, 10, 111 

Crofoot, Dea. Stephen, 15, 16, 141 
Crofut, — see Crofoot. 

Davis, Miss Elizabeth D., 5 

Harold S., 7 

Rev. Dr. William V. W., 

7, 28 134 
Call, 47 ; education, 48 ; 
Robert College, in, 48 ; 
Franklin Street Church, 
Manchester, at, 48 ; Eu- 
clid Avenue Presbyterian 
Church, Cleveland, at, 48 ; 
death, 49 ; as preacher, 
50 ; in social life, 51 ; and 
young people, 51 ; in 
community, 52 ; burial 
place, 53 ; public schools, 
interest in, 54 ; church 
building, interest in 55 ; 
and country churches, 
55 ; his wife, loss of, 57 ; 
misunderstood, 58 ; In- 
fluence, 59. 

Mrs. W. V. W., 48, 57 

Dawes, Henry I^., 87 

"Dialogue Between Christ, a 

Youth, and the Devil," 81 
Dickinson, Parthenia, — seeFenn, 

Mrs. C. T. 
Duelling, 79 

Dunham, J. H. 33, 42 



Eager. Miss M. M., 
Easton, James, 
Edwards, Jonathan, 



8 
18 
63, 69, 97 



Eliot, President Charles W., 80 

Elsesser, Rev. Rene, 11 

Ensign, Jacob, 16 

Escher, Carl, 11 
Euclid Avenue Presbyterian 

Church, 48 



148 
Index — Continued 



Fenn, Mrs. C. T., 33, 34 

First Church. General Sketch of 
History of, 13 ; forma- 
tion, 15 ; covenant, 15 
first meeting, record of 
16 ; discord in, 20 ; se 
cession of members, 20 
relations with town, 20 . 
21 ; re-union with Union 
Parish, 21 : 125th Anni- 
versary, 27 ; meeting 
houses of, 28. 
Foote, Marshall, 39 

Fosdick, Rev. H. E., 96 

Foster, Pres. W. T., 80 

Foundation Men, 16, 67, 141 

Franklin Street Congregational 
Church. 48 

Free Will Society, 38, 142 

Gallatin, Albert, 35 

Garfield, President H, A., 8, 64 
Gififord, Mrs. A. McK., 7, 61 

Goodwin, W. D.. 10 

Gregg, Rev. J. E., 5, 7, 11, 63, 
64, 67, 68, 75, 84, 88, 128 

Haldane. Lord, 44 

Harris, Rev. Samuel, 23 

Hibbard, C. L., 7, 47 

Higginson, John, 97 

Hinsdale. Miss Elizabeth W., 5 

Hobart, Rev Noah, 81 

Hooker, Rev. Mr., 18 

Hooker, Rev. Asahel, 38 

Hopkins, Rev. Samuel. 15, 18. 128 

Hubbard, Daniel, 16 

Hughes. Gov. Charles E., 97 

Hull, .Tames W., 87 

Humphrey, Rev. Heman, 21, 22. 

32, 33, 38, 39, 64, 134, 

his life, period of, 64 

Indian oppression, re 

monstrances against, 77 

78 : publications, various 

79 ; Amherst Collegiate 
Institute, at. 79. 80 
"New England Primer" 
introduction to. 81 ; rec 
ollections of. 81 ; sports 
interest in. 82 ; newspa 
pers, contributions to, 83 

Mrs. Heman, 38 

Henry M.. 8. 75, 76 

Miss Sarah W.. 32 

" Rev. Zephaniah. 32 

Hyde, Rev. Alvan. 36. 39, 134 



Jacobs, James, 10 

Jefferson. Thomas, 34, 35 

Jenkins, Rev. Charles, 25 

Jenkins, Rev. Jonathan L., D.D., 

13. 16, 18. 22, 25. 26, 27, 
28,43,47,49,76,85, 134 

Kellogg. Ensign. 87 

Kennedy, Alexander, 10 

King Arthur, Knights of, 142 

Lafayette College, 6 

Learned. Edward, 87 

Letter of Acceptance of Thomas 

Allen, 17 

"Letters to a Son in the Minis- 
try," 79 
Lincoln. Abraham, 83, 115 
Little, Woodbridge, 34, 35 
Livingston, Philip. 14 
Livingstone, David, 116 
Lodge, Senator Henry C, 35 



Martin, Rev. Ebenezer, 
Marquand. Prof. Allan, 
Mather. Cotton. 
JicArthur. W. Erving, 
Mears, Mrs. W. W.. 
Meeting-house, first. 
Meeting-houses. 28, and see 

frontispiece. 
Memorial Portrait Gallery, 10, 
Michigan. University of. 
Mission Band, 

Missionaries from The First 
Church, 



15 
66 
97 
10 
11 
15 



133 

6 

142 

33 



"Indian Rightsand Our Duties," 
Invitations sent, 



77 
6 



Neill. Rev. Henry. 32 

Nettleton revival. 31, 32, 40 

"New England Primer," 81 

"Old Town Folks," 43 

One Hundred and Twenty-fifth 

Anniversary, 5, 16, 85 

O'Sullivan, Mrs., 81 

Paddock, Dr. Brace W., 22, 38 

Dr. Frank K.. 87 

" Mrs. Frank K., 5 

Dr. W. L., 22 

Pageant. 8, 141 

participants in, 

142, 143. 144 

Palmer, Rev. C. J., 7 

Pastor, the, — see Gregg, Rev. 

J. E. 

Pearl Street Church, Hartford, 26 

Phelps. Elnathan, 16, 67 

Lemuel, 16, 67 

William, 16, 67 



149 
Index — Continued 



Pierce, Rev. Payson E.. 8 

Pingree, T. P., 87 

Plunketts, the, 87 

Plunkett, Thomas F., 5 

Pomeroy, Robert, 82 

Porter, Noah, 38 

Sophia, 76 

Portraits, contributed, catalogue 

of, 1.35-140 

Portrait Gallery, Memorial, 

11, 13.3 
Pratt, Dr. Llewellyn, 40 

"Prayer for Church and Town, 

A," 84 

Programs, Sunday services ; 
morning. 9 ; afternoon, 
10 ; evening, 11. 
Punderson, Rev. Thomas, 

20, 23, 34 

Redfield, Miss Julia W., 7, 31 

Redflelds, the, 87 

Reese, Anthony, 11 

Rockwell, Robert C 41 
Prof. William W„ 39 

Rowland, Dr., 39 

Ruskin, John, 97 

Russells, the, 87 

Saltus, Mr., 81 

Schaff, Morris, 8, 84 

Scott, Capt. Robert N., llfi 

Shade Trees and Sidewalks, 83 
Shepard, Thomas, c>9 

Rev. Samuel, 36 

Shipton, George, 10 

Slavery, 76 

Smith, Rev. Henry G., 8, 67, 68 
Smith's History. 14, 20 

South Congregational Church, 

20, 23, 34 
"Some Great Revivals," 32 

State Street Congregational 

Church, Portland, 26 

Stiles, Ephraim, 16, 25 

Stiles, President, 25 

Stoddard, John. 14, 63, 67, 69 

Storrs, Rev. Dr., 26 

Stowe, Harriet Beecher, 43 

Strong, Ashbel, 34, 35 

Rev. Thomas, 18 



Sunday School, exercises in. 9 
Sun, Pittsfleld, 32, 35, 41, 134 
Sunrise Prayer Meeting ; tradi- 
tional origin, 31 ; Dea. 
Dunham, testimony of, 
33 ; split in Church, 34 ; 
re-union. 38 ; Mr. Pun- 
derson, 39 ; Dr. E. Tay- 
lor, testimony of, 40 ; 
Fourth of July meeting, 
41 ; atmosphere of, 42 ; 
in Lee, 42 ; significance 
of, 43. 
Swing, Prof. David, 76 



Taft, Henry W., 
Tappan, Rev. H. P., 
Taylor, Rev. Edward, 

L. W., 
Texas, University of, 
Todd, Rev. John, 



87 

23, 134 

40 

40 

6 

23, 24, 25, 



41, 64, 76, 81, 84, 134 

Tucker, Joseph, 87 

Tucker, Rev. W. J., 48 

Tyler, Wellington, 28 



Union Parish, 




20, 


36, 


38 


Warriners, the. 








87 


Wendell, Jacob, 








14 


West, Frederick T., 








9 


Gilbert, 








41 


Dr. Stephen, 








134 


Wests, the. 








87 


Wheelock, John, 








71 


White, Horace, 








35 


Whittlesey. William 


A., 






9 


Williams College, 6, 


6.3, 


64, 


66, 


67 


Williams, Col. Ephraim 


» 




63 


John C, 








63 


" Mrs. John 


c, 




64, 


70 


Col. Willi 


iam. 






63 


Willis, Sheriff. 








82 


Woodbridge. Rev. Timothy, 




18 


Wright, Josiah, 








18 



Yeomans, Rev. John W., 



23