(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Forgotten shrines : an account of some old Catholic halls and families in England, and of relics and memorials of the English martyrs"

FORGOTTEN 
SHRINES 






DOM BEDE CAMM 



O.S.B., B.A 



FORGOTTEN 
SHRINES 

AN ACCOUNT OF SOME OLD CATHOLIC 
HALLS AND FAMILIES IN ENGLAND 
AND OF RELICS AND MEMORIALS 
OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

By DOM BEDE CAMM, O.S.B., B.A. Oxon. 

AUTHOR OF 'LIVES OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS ' ETC. 
EDITOR OF 'THE ST. NICHOLAS SERIES OF BEAUTIFUL BOOKS' 



PUBLISHED IN LONDON BY MACDONALD 6? EVANS 
AT FOUR ADAM STREET ADELPHI W.C. 
AND IN ST. LOUIS MO. BY B. HERDER 
SEVENTEEN SOUTH BROADWAY MCMX 




fcRA/QS 



NfrRJ26 i c ^ 



of 
83369? 




BALLANTYNE & COMPANY LTD 

THE BALLANTYNE PRESS 

TAVISTOCK STREET COVENT GARDEN 

LONDON 



DEDICATED IN MEMORY OF HAPPY DAYS 
AT OXFORD, ROME, AND SUBIACO, 
TO THE BEST BELOVED OF SONS 

COULD I BUT GIVE THEE AUGHT MORE WORTH THE GIFT 
HE GAVE ME IN THV FRIENDSHIP, IT WERE THINE : 

UNDYING THANKS TO HIM MY HEART UPLIFT 

BEST, TRUEST, FIRST OF FRIENDS, TAKE THIS POOR SIGN ! 




PREFACE 

ARDINAL NEWMAN, in the most wonderful of all 
his sermons, has treated with matchless eloquence the 
theme of the decay and death of the ancient Church 
in this land, and of its miraculous resurrection in that 
" Second Spring " which came so unexpectedly 
to close the long winter of persecution. 

"All seemed to be lost," he says; "there 
was a struggle for a time, and then its priests 
were cast out or martyred. There were 
sacrileges innumerable. Its temples were profaned or destroyed ; its 
revenues seized by covetous nobles, or squandered upon the ministers oi 
a new faith. The presence of Catholicism was at length simply removed, 
its grace disowned its power despised its name, except as a matter 
of history, at length almost unknown. . . . 

" No longer the Catholic Church in the country ; nay, no longer, I 
may say a Catholic community ; but a few adherents of the Old Religion, 
moving silently and sorrowfully about, as memorials of what had been. 
. . . There, perhaps, an elderly person, seen walking in the streets, 
grave and solitary, and strange, though noble in bearing, and said to be 
of good family and a ' Roman Catholic.' An old-fashioned house of 
gloomy appearance, closed in with high walls, with an iron gate and 
yews, and the report attaching to it that ' Roman Catholics ' lived there ; 
but who they were, or what was meant by calling them Roman Catholics, 
no one could tell ; though it had an unpleasant sound and told of form 
and superstition." 

I have attempted in this book to tell the story of some of those 
ancient manor houses which became the last refuges of the ancient faith, 
when it was proscribed and persecuted throughout the land. The air of 
mystery and romance which seems to exhale from the crumbling walls 
of these old houses, irresistibly moves those who come across them to 
curiosity if not to reverence. And this is an attempt to satisfy such 
legitimate curiosity. 

Englishmen of all creeds have grown more sympathetic of late, as 
they have come to know something of the true story of that long perse- 
cution which made their Catholic fellow countrymen outlaws in their 
own land, and turned their most treasured religious convictions into 
crime against the State. We are beginning to understand the extra- 
ordinary loyalty of these Recusants, so faithful to the sovereign who 
persecuted them just because they were so true to the religion of their 

vii 



PREFACE 

fathers, and with Gairdner, Jessopp, Cox, Frere and many another 
Anglican writer, can give our tribute of admiration to those heroic men 
who bore the horrors of Tyburn without flinching rather than betray 
their conscience or deny their faith. 

It is hoped, therefore, that this book, which deals with some of the 
most romantic of these ancient homes, and with the Jives of some or 
those who dwelt there, may have an interest for a far wider circle of 
readers than can be looked for among the small body of English 
Catholics. 

I have attempted also to give some account of the principal relics 
and memorials of the martyrs of those sad days, relics which are 
cherished, for the most part, by the older religious communities, or 
by the families which have clung to the faith all through the penal 
times. 

There are so many friends to whom my gratitude is due for their kind 
assistance, that it is really impossible to name them all. But I cannot 
omit to mention Mr. George Buchannan of Whitby, Mr. R, Trappes- 
Lomax, Miss Louise Imogen Guiney, Mr. Fitzherbert of Swynnerton, 
the Lady Stafford, Mr. W. Fitzherbert-Brockholes of Claughton Hall, 
Colonel Hart-Davis of Wardley Hall, Mr. Joseph Gillow, Mr. James 
Watts of Abney Hall, Sir Benjamin Stone of Erdington, Mr. Stafford 
H. Jerningham, Mr. John Eyston of Hendred House, Mr. John 
Foster of Horton-in-Ribblesdale, Sir Henry Ingilby of Ripley Castle, the 
Rev. Father Storey of Egton Bridge, Mr. R. H. Murray of Worcester, 
Mr. John Humphreys of Birmingham, Miss Capel Miers of Eastbach 
Court, Mr. William Bolton and Miss A. Jackson of Chorley, Mr. 
George Hull of Gregson Lane, Mr. Peter Worden, and Mr. Joseph F. 
Carter of Kimbolton, who have all given generous help in various ways. 
To my friends Miss Gunning and Miss Jewitt of Erdington, we 
owe the excellent index, which adds so much to the value of a book of 
this kind. 

I have to thank, too, her Grace the Duchess of Norfolk for leave to 
reproduce the unique " Badge of the Pilgrimage of Grace," which is 
appropriately stamped on the cover of this volume ; Mr. Fletcher Moss, 
author of Pilgrimages to Old Homes, for the loan of several blocks, 
chiefly illustrating the section OH Father Barlow ; Mr. James Britten, 
K.S.G., and the Committee of the Catholic Truth Society for leave tc 
reprint part of the life of Father Barlow, which I had already published 
under their auspices ; the Rev. J. J. Wynne, S.J., and the 'Editors of 
the Dublin Review, the Catholic Fireside and the Catholic World for leave 
to reproduce portions of the text and, in some cases, illustrations, which 
had already appeared in their pages. I have also to thank Sir Benjamin 



via 



PREFACE 

Stone and Mr. Bate of Bromsgrove, for permission to reproduce some of 
their beautiful photographs of Harvington Hall. 

Most of the photographs illustrating the text are my own work, and 
I trust that 1 have not infringed any copyright in reproducing the 
others. I have to thank Mr. Miller of Christchurch, Hants., Messrs. 
Stott of Ripley, Mr. Frank Sutcliffe of Whitby, and Mr. Bateson of 
Gregson Lane, who have kindly placed their photographs at my disposal. 

But I feel a very special debt of gratitude to my artist, Mr. Joseph 
Pike, for the very beautiful drawings with which he has illustrated and 
adorned the text. Mr. Pike is still a young man, and there can be no 
doubt as to his great talent. It is, however, unnecessary for me to praise 
work of which my readers can judge the merit for themselves. 

And in conclusion I feel I must thank the many kind friends, known 
and unknown, who so generously subscribed to this work while it was 
yet unprinted ; nor can I refrain from expressing my deep gratitude for 
the kind and gracious encouragement with which his Grace the Arch- 
bishop of Westminster and almost every member of the Catholic 
Hierarchy in England have been pleased to welcome and to bless my 
scheme. 

Though I cannot but fear that manifold imperfections in carrying it 
out may cause disappointment to some of my readers, I venture to hope 
that, on the whole, this work may prove useful, and that it may help 
in some small degree to spread a deeper understanding and a wider 
sympathy for the old Religion of our country, and for those who clung 
to it so faithfully in the dark days that are past. 

D. B. C. 

ERDINCTON ABBEY, 

FEAST or THE NATIVITY OF OUR LADY. 
September 8, 1910. 



CONTENTS 

THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS : 

THE ORIGIN OF THE FAMILY I 

NORBURY HALL 5 

NORBURY CHURCH 10 

CONFESSORS OF THE FAITH 20 

THE GATHERING OF THE STORM 30 

THE MARTYRS OF PADLEY 39 

THE CROWN 47 

THE FATE OF THE ACCOMPLICES 57 

FAITHFUL UNTO DEATH 66 

A RUINED CASTLE BY THE SEA 75 

STONOR PARK AND ITS MARTYRS 91 

MARKENFIELD HALL AND THE RISING OF THE 

NORTH 104 

RIPLEY CASTLE AND ITS MARTYRED SON 128 

AN OXFORD MARTYR 149 

IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS : SOME LANCASHIRE TRADI- 
TIONS OF VEN. EDMUND ARROWSMITH, S.J. 183 

THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL : 

THE SKULL HOUSE 202 

THE STORY OF THE SKULL 206 

BARLOW HALL 209 

HANDFORTH HALL 215 

DOUAY 220 

THE MISSION 224 

THE LAST YEARS 234 

LANCASTER CASTLE 238 

THE MARTYR'S CROWN 242 

THE SECRET TREASURE OF CHAIGLEY 247 
A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE, HIS HOME AND HIS FLOCK 253 

A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 281 

WOODCOCK HALL AND THE MARTYR'S ALTAR 34 

xi 



CONTENTS 

THE OLD CHAPEL AT MAWDESLEY 31 2 

INVENTORY OF CHURCH GOODS AT LANE END HOUSE, 

MAWDESLEY 3*5 

BADDESLEY CLINTON 3 '9 

WASHINGLEY HALL 32? 

PEMBRIDGE CASTLE 333 

THE CHAPEL OF ST. AMAND AND ST. JOHN BAPTIST 

AT EAST HENDRED 343 

BURGHWALLIS HALL 351 

RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 355 

APPENDIX A 383 

APPENDIX B 385 

APPENDIX C 390 

APPENDIX D 394 

APPENDIX E 397 

PART OF THE PEDIGREE OF THE FITZHERBERTS OF 

NORBURY AND SWYNNERTON fa c \ vg p age 398 

INDEX 399 



xn 



ILLUSTRATIONS 

HARVINGTON HALL [Frontispiece] 

THE CHANCEL OF NORBURY CHURCH i 

SIGNATURES OF SIR T. FITZHERBERT, KT., ETC. ORIGINAL 

DEED GRANTING NORBURY TO THE FITZHERBERTS 2 

THE OLDEST SEAL WITH THE FITZHERBERT ARMS 4 

GRANT BY KING EDWARD I TO SIR HENRY FITZHERBERT 4 

GREAT HALL, NORBURY MANOR HOUSE 7 
SIR ANTHONY FITZHERBERT'S STUDY 

OAK PARLOUR, NORBURY MANOR HOUSE 9 
THE TOMB OF NICHOLAS FITZHERBERT 10 
NORBURY CHURCH FROM THE SOUTH 1 1 
NORBURY CHURCH FROM THE EAST 12 
THE TOMB OF RALPH FITZHERBERT 16 
SHIELD OF SIR THOMAS FITZHERBERT 22 
HOLOGRAPH LETTER OF SIR THOMAS FITZHERBERT TO SECRE- 
TARY WALSINGHAM 32 

THE FlTZHERBERT-ToPCLIFFE FlNE 38 

PADLEY CHAPEL 40 

PADLEY CHAPEL, SOUTH-WEST 41 

BROUGHTON CASTLE 49 

DOOR OF THE GREAT HALL, NORBURY MANOR HOUSE 50 
ANTHONY FITZHERBERT'S QUIETUS FOR RECUSANCY, 1606. 
TOPCLIFFE'S ENDORSEMENT OF THE FINE OF THE MANOR 

OF PADLEY 58 

THOMAS FITZHERBERT, S.J. 68 

THE CHRIST OF SWYNNERTON 72 

THE RUINED TOWER, WARBLINGTON CASTLE 75 

THE PRIORY CHURCH, CHRISTCHURCH, HANTS 75 

THE PORCH, WARBLINGTON CHURCH 76 

THE GATEWAY, WARBLINGTON CASTLE 76 

FRONT VIEW OF THE PALACE OF BEAULIEU 79 

BLESSED MARGARET OF SALISBURY 80 

ACHIEVEMENT OF ARMS OF HENRY VIII 80 

INSIDE PROSPECT, BEAULIEU 83 

REGINALD, CARDINAL POLE 84 

CHANTRY OF B. MARGARET OF SALISBURY 86 

ARMS OF B. MARGARET OF SALISBURY 88 

SHIELD OF THE FIVE WOUNDS 88 

STONOR PARK 93 

xiii 



ILLUSTRATIONS 

PORCH, STONOR PARK 94 

B. ADRIAN FORTESCUE 

BLESSED EDMUND CAMPION, S.J. 

TITLE-PAGE OF B. EDMUND CAMPION'S " TEN REASONS " 

MARKENFIELD HALL IO 4 

KITCHEN, MARKENFIELD HALL 

DOOR IN THE LODGINGS, MARKENFIELD HALL 108 

MARKENFIELD HALL FROM THE EAST 112 

MARKENFIELD HALL FROM THE NORTH 114 

RICHARD NORTON OF NORTON CONYERS 116 

BLESSED THOMAS PERCY, EARL OF NORTHUMBERLAND 120 

ARMS OF BLESSED THOMAS PERCY 122 

TOMB OF SIR THOMAS MARKENFIELD AND DIONISIA, HIS 

WIFE 124 
TOMB OF SIR THOMAS MARKENFIELD AND ELEANOR, HIS 

WIFE 124 

TOMB OF SIR THOMAS INGLEBY 128 

RIPLEY CASTLE 13 l 

THE KNIGHT'S CHAMBER, RIPLEY CASTLE 133 

SIR THOMAS AND DAME EDELINE INGLEBY 136 

TOMB OF SIR THOMAS AND DAME EDELINE 136 

THE SHAMBLES, YORK 139 

VENERABLE MARGARET CLITHEROWE 140 

BISHOPTHORPE, YORK 141 

GUILDHALL, YORK 143 

VENERABLE FRANCIS INGLEBY 144 

OLD OUSE BRIDGE, YORK 146 

WEEPING CROSS, RIPLEY 146 

HOLYWELL MANOR HOUSE AND CHURCH OF ST. CROSS 150 

HOLYWELL MANOR HOUSE 150 

CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE, OXFORD 154 

THE COMMANDERY FROM THE RlVER, SANDFORD 175 

DOOR OF THE OLD CHAPEL, SANDFORD 178 

GATEWAY IN THE GARDEN, SANDFORD 178 

QUADRANGLE, HOGHTON TOWER 183 

GREAT HALL, HOGHTON TOWER 184 

VENERABLE EDMUND ARROWSMITH, S.J. 186 

HOUSE OF THE LAST MASS, GREGSON LANE 188 

ROOM WHERE THE LAST MASS WAS SAID l88 
IVORY SHRINE 

THE OLD BLUE ANCHOR INN, HOGHTON 
MAP OF ROUTE OF FATHER ARROWSMITH'S FLIGHT 
xiv 



ILLUSTRATIONS 

THE HOLY HAND 106 

THE MARTYRDOM OF FATHER ARROWSMITH 196 

WARDLEY HALL FROM THE NORTH-WEST 202 

WARDLEY HALL FROM THE SOUTH 204 

WARDLEY HALL FROM THE SOUTH-EAST 204. 

THE OLD CHAPEL OF THE COMMANDERY, SANDFORD 206 

THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 206 

THE SKULL ON THE STAIRCASE 208 

THE STAIRCASE, WARDLEY HALL 208 

BARLOW HALL 210 

THE QUADRANGLE, BARLOW HALL 212 

SIR ALEXANDER BARLOW, KT. 214 

PORCH, HANDFORTH HALL 216 

HANDFORTH HALL 218 

THE STAIRCASE, HANDFORTH HALL 220 

VENERABLE AMBROSE BARLOW, O.S.B. 230 

HANDFORTH HALL 238 

HAND OF VEN. AMBROSE BARLOW, O.S.B. 244 

RELICS OF THE CHAIGLEY MARTYR 250 

INTERIOR OF THE COURT, HARVINGTON HALL 253 

BANQUETING-ROOM AND STAIRCASE, HARVINGTON HALL 254 
ENTRANCE TO HIDING-HOLE IN STAIRCASE, HARVINGTON 

HALL 256 

STAIRCASE, HARVINGTON HALL 258 

LADY YATE'S BEDROOM 258 

HIDING-PLACE IN HARVINGTON HALL 259 

LADY YATE'S NURSERY 260 

LABYRINTH OF PASSAGES AROUND THE SECRET CHAPEL 260 

HARVINGTON HALL, BRIDGE ACROSS THE MOAT 262 

DAME MARY YATE 264 

EXTERIOR OF THE CHANCEL, CHADDESLEY CORBET CHURCH 266 

RUSHOCK COURT AND THE WITCHES' POOL 268 

PURSHALL HALL 270 

MONUMENT IN MEMORY OF VEN. JOHN WALL, O.F.M. 274 

THE SECRET CHAPEL, PURSHALL HALL 278 

PLAN OF COMMUNION TABLE, PURSHALL HALL 278 

PURSHALL HALL FROM THE GARDEN 280 

ONE OF FATHER POSTGATE'S CHALICES 284 

HAND OF FATHER POSTGATE 284 

FATHER POSTGATE'S BONE CRUCIFIX 287 

FATHER POSTGATE'S HERMITAGE, UGTHORPE 292 

THE OLD MASS HOUSE, EGTON 294 

xv 



ILLUSTRATIONS 

FATHER POSTGATE'S SECRET ORATORY 296 

PLAN AND ELEVATION, OLD MASS HOUSE, EGTON 297 

DOOR OF FATHER POSTDATE'S TABERNACLE 298 

RELICS OF FATHER POSTDATE 300 

BOOK WITH AUTOGRAPH SIGNATURE OF FATHER POSTGATE 302 

FATHER POSTGATE'S HYMN 303 

WOODCOCK HALL 305 

THE OLD MISSIONARY ALTAR 309 

RELICS AT LANE END HOUSE, MAWDESLEY 316 

THE MOATED HALL OF BADDESLEY CLINTON 321 

WASHINGLEY HALL 331 

PEMBRIDGE CASTLE 333 

INTERIOR OF THE COURT, PEMBRIDGE CASTLE 335 

FATHER KEMBLE'S SEAT 337 
SERMON AT THE PILGRIMAGE TO FATHER KEMBLE'S GRAVE, 

1909 340 
ALTAR, CHALICE, MISSAL, AND MISSAL STAND OF VEN. 

JOHN KEMBLE 342 
HENDRED HOUSE IN 1661 345 
CHAPEL OF ST. AMAND, EAST HENDRED 348 
DRINKING-CAN OF B. THOMAS MORE 350 
BURGHWALLIS HALL 35 I 
RELICS AT SUTTON PARK, GUILDFORD 366 
HAND OF FATHER KEMBLE 368 
HAIR-SHIRT OF B. THOMAS MORE 370 
PAGES FROM THE PRAYER-BOOK OF B. THOMAS PERCY 372 
THE GEORGE AND CRUCIFIX OF B.THOMAS MORE AND THE 
WATCH WORN BY LORD STAFFORD AT HIS MARTYR- 
DOM 374 
ALTAR FROM MAINS HALL OPEN AND CLOSED 376 
THE CLAUGHTON CHALICE 378 
RELIQUARY CROSS OF ST. SCHOLASTICA'S ABBEY, TEIGN- 

MOUTH 3 8o 
RELICS OF THE B. ENGLISH MARTYRS FROM STONYHURST 

COLLEGE -jg o 

LORD STAFFORD'S DIAMOND PE-NDANT 81 



xvi 




THE CHANCEL OF NORBURY CHURCH 

The brass of Sir Anthony Fitzherbert lies on the floor 
between the two altar tombs. Photo by the author 



To face page i 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

THE ORIGIN OF THE FAMILY 



1 



are but few families still flourishing in England that 
are able to prove a lineal male descent from an ancestor 
who took part in the Norman Conquest, and still fewer 
able to establish their pedigree from authentic documents 
remaining in their own possession. This distinction, however, belongs 
to the Fitzherberts of Norbury and Swynnerton. For over seven 
hundred years the Manor of Norbury, with its ancient Hall, was in 
possession of the family, and though it has unhappily passed out of 
the hands of the present head of the house, Swynnerton still remains to 
the Fitzherberts, as well as other estates which have belonged to them 
for centuries. 

But to the Catholic, the Fitzherberts possess a title to fame far more 
glorious than that of ancient lineage or wide possessions. In spite of 
centuries of fierce persecution they have been ever loyal to the ancient 
faith, ever true to their grand device, Ung je serviray ; shrinking not 
from poverty or exile, imprisonment or death, so that they might remain 
the true servants of their King. 

It is principally with the story of these Fitzherberts, who were 
loyal even under the supreme test of martyrdom, that we are here 
concerned. Other more competent writers have traced the family 
history and recounted its fortunes, yet it may not be out of place to 
give here some account of the origin of a house that is thus doubly 
illustrious. 

Fortunately, the materials for the family history are as voluminous as 
they are interesting. The great MS. " Family Book " preserved at Swyn- 
nerton, a huge folio drawn up by Michael Jones, F.S.A., under the direction 
of Thomas Fitzherbert, Esquire, Twenty-fifth Lord of Norbury (1789- 
1857), and since continued up to date, is a storehouse of records, 
pedigrees, biographies, and copies of documents, together with drawings, 
prints, and facsimiles of grants, monuments, brasses, portraits, the 
illuminated shields of the families with which the Fitzherberts have 
contracted alliances, and everything that the most patient care and 
wide learning have been able to gather together about the family. It 
is true that here and there later investigation has been able to correct 
some of the conclusions arrived at by the author. More than one 
Derbyshire antiquary of note has laboured at the Fitzherbert history 
with learned enthusiasm, and their discoveries have not been neglected 
here. 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The present writer has been given free access to the original documents 
preserved at Swynnerton, as well as to the Family Book. One of his 
pilgrimages to Norburywas made in company with the present head of the 
family, without whose kind and generous co-operation this record could 
not have seen the light.* 

The ancestor of the Fitzherberts was a Norman, who seems to have 
been a retainer of one of the Conqueror's most powerful barons, Henry 
de Ferrers. This ancestor, Herbert by name, had a son named William, 
who, according to a custom prevalent among the Normans, was known 
as Fils or Fitz Herbert, and thus Fitzherbert became the family 
patronymic. 

His feudal lord, Henry de Ferrers, had a vast share of the spoil 
when the Conqueror began to apportion it out among his followers. He 
received no less than 113 manors in Derbyshire alone. He thus laid 
the foundation of a great family, which has survived to our own day, and 
in one of its elder branches (the Ferrers of Baddesley Clinton) has had, 
like the Fitzherberts themselves, the grace to preserve the faith intact 
throughout all the vicissitudes of fortune. 

The Norman conquerors were devout Catholics, and gave the 
Church a generous share of their spoil. In 1080 Henry de Ferrers 
founded the Benedictine Priory of the Blessed Virgin Mary of Tut- 
bury, though the first charter of foundation was not granted until 
the succeeding reign (1087-1100) by Robert, first Earl Ferrers. 
Among the numerous manors with which he endowed the monastery 
was that of Norbury. 

Norbury is situated on the Dove, close to the south-western border of 
Derbyshire, and about four miles from Ashbourne. It belonged in the 
reign of the Contessor to a great Saxon thane named Siward. There was 
even then a priest and a church, besides a mill, twenty-four acres of 
meadow land, and a wood, one mile in length and breadth, for pasturing 
swine. 

But the monks of Tutbury did not long retain possession of the 
manor. In 1125 (no doubt at the instance of Robert de Ferrers) 

* The writer must also express his obligations to the writings of Dr. J. Charles Cox, 
who has made this subject peculiarly his own. See Churches of 'Derbyshire (Ltemrose, 1877), 
vols. iii. and v. ; Three Centuries of Derbyshire Annah, vol. i. (Bemrose, 1890) ; the Journal 
of the Derbyshire Archaeological Society, vols". vii. and xxv. He also is indebted to various 
papers by Sir Ernest Clarke, as well as to Mr. St. John Hope, Journal, vol. iv. ; Mr. 
J. Bailey, Journal, vols. iv. and v. ; the Rev. Reginald H. C. Fitzherbert, Journal, xix. and xx. ; 
Mr. J. Tilley, Old Halls, Manors and families of "Derbyshire, by J.T. (1893) ; also to Mr! 
R. Trappes-Lomax, who has put his transcripts from the Fitzherbert records and many 
valuable notes at the author's disposition. The Journal of the Derbyshire Archaeological 
Society is quoted in these notes simply as the Journal. 

^ 



/ fttlllO iltllU'.Hll.Ulv'lU ulll l"tt>iiv vvi.mnv J'1 11 | " w 1"v Him 
.')':' "u.-iii'rtili I" -^WKII Vo.l5i ilalu tt'illiw fill* (KrKl ^ollii.ini in 




. . :m out 

""' yK> frt ttulEr v Jiuciu-' rrv.-i K-r.-,u.-vpll iVniiuiMJ-n \ 

, i)<ajiVjfinniril'"J.>mt*V-illiii.u-lKtv(.-i i'nwnlif.-\ini,fvtlulf' 
|ari<j|^^Bf/ro)'r)mitCO!Kiirifiui>Mi.-miliY"i'V"i''mKlilf uuiiiiMilm 

H- f.\<! < .!li n ((!)!> hour fil I'c .\1 4 ftikh.-r .< <uiik M M' * ivmfniUc oirlnull 
W>'ll"lltBld<duiw.Xfa'flV\V/lUlKr\tlUWfil .'infHKlwI.n.fRt' 

Kv '.. .-..01(1 "* ,ll KftVik -K / 

l.lu,,, i! (it loll 

tlX^laUr tviirlltrc* 

_ ; 

.. - "' . I 

r^k r^> rk^t 

. 



iv, ;,/ 
' ^ 



THE ORIGINAL DEED GRANTING 
NORBURY TO THE FITZHERBERTS 

From the facsimile in the Family Book at Swynnerton 
Photo by the author 




SIGNATURES OF SIR THOMAS FITZHERBERT, 
KT., THOMAS FITZHERBERT, ESQ., AND 
MARTIN AUDLEY 

From a deed at Swynnerton. Photo by the author To face page 2 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

William the Prior granted it by charter to William Fitz Herbert and to 
his heirs, to be holden in fee of the Priory of Tutbury, subject to the 
yearly fee-farm rent of one hundred shillings, and of five shillings 
annually in lieu of tithes for the lands in demesne and two bovates, and 
subject also to the usual feudal burdens. 

From this date the Fitzherberts held Norbury as tenants of Tutbury 
Priory. However, in the fifteenth century, the then lord of Norbury, 
Nicholas Fitzherbert, with Ralph, his son, enfranchised the manor 
from these rents and services, giving in exchange to Thomas Gedney, 
then Prior of Tutbury, various lands, tenements, and rents in Osmaston, 
Foston, and Church Broughton, Derbyshire. 

The precious charter which granted Norbury to William Fitzherbert 
is still in the possession of his twenty-seventh lineal descendent, Basil 
Fitzherbert, Esquire, of Swynnerton, County Stafford, as is the later 
document by which the manor was enfranchised. We give an illus- 
tration of the former taken from a facsimile made by Willemart for 
the Family Book, as the original charter has been so injured by 
chemicals in the attempt to make it legible, that it is almost impossible to 
photograph it. 

We give a translation of a copy of this deed in the Chartulary of 
Tutbury, now in the College of Arms (The copy is not a complete 
transcript) : "In the year from the Incarnation of our Lord 1125 
William the Prior and the Convent of the Church of St. Mary 
of Tutbury, Granted to William the son of Herbert, Norbury 
in fee to him and his heirs, rendering 100 shillings every year, 
50 shillings at the Annunciation of St. Mary and other 50 shillings at 
the feast of St. Michael for his homage . . . and if he shall be sum- 
moned by the Prior he shall ... in the province of Tutbury and if 
the Lord of Tutbury should redeem his body from captivity or should 
marry his eldest daughter or should repurchase his honour [? pay a 
relief] and the Prior of Tutbury should grant to him an aid for these 
purposes, then the said William or his heirs shall contribute to the said 
Prior a competent aid according to his fee. And if the Prior and 
Convent should purchase any land, the said W T illiam or his heir shall 
make a competent aid according to his fee. And if the said William or 
his heir shall not pay the said rent at the appointed times, he shall be 
brought to justice, and if he cannot be brought to justice and shall 
retain the rents the Prior shall then cause Norbury to be seized and 
afterwards the said William or his heir shall be justly dealt with accord- 
ing to the judgment of the Court of the Prior, and when the said 
William shall die his heir shall relieve his fee given from the Prior 
and Convent. Moreover also the said William or his heir shall give 

3 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

every year on the aforesaid times five shillings for the tythes of the 
Demesne and for two bovates of land liable to tythe. For this grant 
the said William gave to the said Prior and monks a measure of 
wheat. And of this convention are witnesses Robert the Bishop, 
Gaufrid Abbot of Burton, Robert de Ferrers and his wife Avise and 
his sons, &c. &c." 

During the centuries that they held Norbury the Fitzherberts in- 
variably intermarried with families of their own knightly rank and as a 
rule with heiresses. Thus they can boast of being able to make the 
proof, so much prized on the Continent, of " sixteen quarterings without 
a window," for all their alliances have been with armigerous families. 
Indeed, their shield at Swynnerton is emblazoned with no fewer than 
121 quarterings. This shield of arms occurs at the foot of the great 
pedigree, compiled by Francis Townsend, Windsor Herald, for Basil 
Fitzherbert in 1796. The original arms of the family are taken from 
those of their feudal lords, as was so frequently the custom among 
vassals as a mark ot subinfeudation. 

William de Ferrers, third Earl of Derby (who was living in 1167), 
married Margaret, heiress of William de Peverel, Earl of Nottingham, 
and adopted her father's arms, Vaire or and gules, as his own. This coat 
henceforth became the arms of the Earls Ferrers, and the Fitzherberts 
of Norbury adopted part of them as their own. 

The shield is thus blazoned : Argent, a chief Vaire or and gules surtout 
a bend sable. There is a very ancient deed preserved in the family 
records bearing this shield. We give a photograph of it, since it is one 
of the earliest known instances of the seal of arms of a private gentleman. 
It is attached to a deed executed by John Fitzherbert, the grandson of 
William, the first grantee of Norbury, and its date is probably late in 
the reign of Henry II., who died in 1189. 

It grants to William the Chaplain, son of Robert, and to whom- 
soever he shall assign them for his homage and service, one culture 
of land between the land of Robert de Wyvile and Depedale and 
between the ditches of the said William the Chaplain and the road. 
Also an acre of meadow in the moor, namely between the meadow 
which Obverdes [?] held and the meadow which Rondulfus Peket 
held, and an acre of land in the wood along the boundary of 
Snelliston [in Norbury]. To be holden of him and his heirs in fee and 
inheritance truly, quietly, honourably, with all liberties and free Commons 
and all Easements to the town of Norbury or Rossington belonging. 
Rendering thence annually to me and my heirs after me xii pence 
before the Nativity of Our Lord for all service and secular demand. 
And that this my Concession and grant shall be ratified and 
4 



' atrtm , riliallll **4 < *J*?<lf~ 
J^ mni (SjWt^ium ^fj.^ 



^^tc*^? 



v-Uv X> )4bfiU 



^SPS1 ? 

Tmfrtrr,t."t,M)^ -.<*/ "** -^ hllHV; n\A*> 

H5*' E ^^> 1 *' \^nn, "."al"V r.""^-^ 




THE OLDEST SEAL WITH THE FITZHERBERT ARMS 







GRANT BY KING EDWARD I. TO SIR HENRY FITZHERBERT 
TO DIVERT THE HIGH ROAD WHICH RAN THROUGH THE 
COURT OF NORBURY MANOR HOUSE 

Photo by the author from the original deeds preserved at Swynnerton To face page $ 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

stable to the said William and his assigns for ever, I have fortified 
the same by the impression of my seal to this present writing 
Witnesses &c. 

Three centuries later, as we shall see, Sir Anthony Fitzherbert, the 
famous judge, adopted the arms of Fitzherbert of Deane, quartered with 
the ancient arms, and this coat (Gules 3 Lions rampant Or) was used by 
the family indiscriminately with the ancient arms, till quite recently,, 
and is still used exclusively by the Fitzherberts of Somersall and 
Tissington. 

It is not easy to conjecture why Sir Anthony adopted this coat, but 
it is probable that it had a reference to the noble house of Herbert, 
Earls of Pembroke, who bear Party per Pale azure and gules, 3 lions 
rampant argent. Sir Anthony may have believed that he was himself 
descended from their Ancestor, Herbert the Chamberlain to Henry II., 
though that was not the fact. In any case the family have now given 
up these arms. 

Their crest is a dexter arm from the elbow, the hand within a 
gauntlet proper. The motto is : Ungje serviray. This is the same as 
that of the Earls of Pembroke, so that it was probably adopted by the 
Fitzherberts of Norbury at the same time as the shield of the three Lions. 
If so, although adopted in error, it was a very happy choice, a truly 
felix culpa. For no motto could be more appropriate to a family who 
were loyal to the death to the one Lord and the one Faith. 



NORBURY HALL 

IT would be difficult to imagine a spot more delightful than the 
ancient house of the Fitzherberts. The charms of a church of extra- 
ordinary dignity and beauty, filled with ancient glass and historic monu- 
ments, would be themselves sufficient to make Norbury a place of 
delight, but the rarer glories of a mediaeval Manor House, inhabited 
for centuries by the family that built it seven hundred years ago, 
and redolent of the romance that is exhaled by the heroic deeds and 
sufferings of a race of Christian heroes, make it a very shrine of 
pilgrimage. 

The surroundings are very beautiful. Standing on a high cliff 
above the river Dove, the Church and Manor House are embowered in 
splendid trees which enhance their architectural charms. 

The Manor House is now untenanted, but is carefully preserved by 
its new owners, who take the greatest pride in its possession. The 
garden is filled with beautiful flowers and shrubs, and a few pieces of 

5 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

good old furniture are placed in the panelled rooms. The Great Hall 
is still used as a barn and is un-restored. 

This Hall was built by Sir Henry Fitzherbert, Sixth Lord of Norbury, 
at the beginning of the fourteenth century. In the old Pedigrees he is 
styled a Knight Banneret (8 Edward II., 1314)- Up to this time the 
Manor House Court was a public thoroughfare, for the road from 
Yeaveley (where the Knights of St. John had a Preceptory) to Ellaston 
passed right through it, crossing the Dove just below the house. Before 
rebuilding his house Sir Henry sought to divert this public road, and 
eventually obtained leave to do so, on payment of a fee of forty shillings, 
and on condition of making another road through his own land equally 
convenient for travellers. This Licence was granted by Letters Patent 
of 8 May, 33 Edward I. (1305), and is still preserved at Swynnerton.* 
We give a reproduction. 

It is curious that Sir Henry, while he was about it, did not divert the 
road still further, for it passes, at present, inconveniently near the south 
side of the house. He cannot have moved it more than 68 paces. The 
Great Hall and State apartments built at this time are well seen in our 
illustration, which is taken from the west. As Dr. Cox remarks, 
" There is but very little domestic work left in England of so early a 
date." The building consists of a parallelogram some 55 feet long by 
25 feet broad, and divided internally by a wall, which cuts off about 
14 feet at the south end to form an ante-room.f 

The building was divided, originally as now, into two stories, the 
exterior string-course marking the floor-level. It will be observed that 
the door is of the fifteenth-century date, the original entrance to both 
stories was at the south end. The Great Hall was lighted by three 
square-headed windows on the west side, which were equi-distant between 
the buttresses. The two original windows of the state-room above 
remain, but are blocked up. The chimney is on the east side ; there is 
a rude stone chimney-piece within the state-room which was 37 feet 
9 inches in length and only 9 feet 10 inches high to the moulded oak 
beams, some of which remain, though the ceiling has been removed and 
the space is open to the modern roof of red tile. Originally it would 
appear that this apartment was lighted by three windows in the west and 
two in the east wall, and these windows were, no doubt, emblazoned 
with many of the coats of arms in stained glass, which were enumerated 
by Laurence Bostock, the herald, on his journey from London to 
Cheshire in October 1581. At the northern end is an arched doorway 

* No. 7 of the Norbury deeds. It is printed in Rymer's Toedera. 

t Cox, Journal, vol. vii., gives a good description of the house, with a plan and several 
illustrations. We are indebted to this account for much of the detail of our description. 

6 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

which, it is conjectured, opened upon a wooden gallery communicating 
with the west wall of the church, in which a closed doorway with the 
diagonal line of a penthouse roof above used to be distinctly visible. 

Nicholas Fitzherbert, Eleventh Lord of Norbury, who did so much 
for the Church, has also left his mark on the fabric of the Hall. The 
beautiful west doorway, of which we give an illustration,* was, no doubt, his 
work, though the door which is now hung in it is believed by Dr. Cox 
to be of earlier date, and to have been moved here from some inner 
doorway, as is indicated by the traceried openings with which it is pierced. 
These circular openings are of Decorated design, and are, therefore, 
probably Sir Henry's work. Sir Nicholas is, no doubt, also responsible 
for the moulded beams of the flat roofs of the rooms of both stories at 
the south end of the Great Hall building. A very narrow staircase 
of oak, about 2 feet 6 inches only in the width, leads from the lower 
room to the upper, and thus gives access to the state apartment. 
The ceiling of this upper room has fine foliated bosses at the inter- 
section of the beams, similar in character to those on the roof of the 
Church. 

At right angles to the Great Hall stands the only other portion of 
the once extensive buildings of the Manor House. This block forms 
the southern side of what was originally the inner Court. But both 
fronts were refaced with red brick in the eighteenth century, and few who 
pass it on the road would guess the real antiquity of the building. 
The date of this portion is not quite certain. It is probably to be 
attributed to Nicholas Fitzherbert (who died in 1473), or at l east 
to his son Ralph, who mentions the "new hall at Norbury" in his 
will, January 21, 1484. Dr. Cox, however, believes that Sir 
Anthony Fitzherbert, the famous judge, Fourteenth Lord of Nor- 
bury (1531-1538) rebuilt or at any rate refitted this block. "Un- 
disputed tradition has assigned to an upper apartment ..." at the 
north-west corner of this building ..." the name of ' Sir Anthony's 
Study,' and a private letter of the family, written in 1703, records the 
then belief that he wrote with his own hand the various texts with which 
the panels are in many places covered. We believe that the panelled 
oak wainscoting of this upper study, as well as of the oak parlour on 
the ground floor, were put in by the judge." He admits, however, that 
this panelling may be of the fifteenth-century date and be the work of 
Nicholas. We give a photograph of Sir Anthony's study, and a drawing 
of the oak parlour which occupies the south-west corner of the ground 
floor. Unfortunately the photograph does not show the text painted in 
black letter on so many of the panels of Sir Anthony's study. One 

* ^cing page 50. 




Q 
D 
H 



h 



OiO 2 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

panel bears a death's head and the device, ^Memento mori. On another is 
the text, Omnes stabimus ante tribunal Christi unusquisque nostrum pro se 
racionem redet T)eo. Ro. 14. (We shall all stand before the judgment- 
seat of Christ . . . each one of us shall render account for himself to 
God.) On another is painted, Trincipium sapienti* timot dm. Pro. 9. 
(The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.) 

If the old judge inscribed these texts upon the walls of his room 
to help him in his preparation for death, he was also, unconsciously, 




affording strength and consolation to his children and descendants in the 
dark days that were coming on them. 

It is instructive to linger in this room and think of the effect these 
stern reminders of eternal truths had on those who dwelt within these 
walls, urging them to constancy and endurance, placing ever before their 
eyes the visions of death and judgment, helping them to weigh in the 
balance of the sanctuary the fleeting honours and pleasures of this world 
against the eternal weight of glory reserved for those who remain faithful 
unto death. 

Memento novissima tua et nunquam peccabis. " Remember thy latter 

end and thou shalt never sin," had been the device of Blessed Thomas 

More, the thought that supported him in his hour of trial ; and it was 

this same truth which came home to the heart of the old judge who had 

B 9 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

himself, alas ! helped to condemn the martyr to death, as he in his turn 
faced his last passage with penitence and hope. 

He died in 1538, and according to the family tradition, as he lay on 
his death-bed, he solemnly enjoined his children under no pretext to 
stain their souls with the possession of Church-lands. And three of the 
sons who knelt by that bed-side were to be faithful not merely to their 
father's dying admonition, but to truth and conscience and religion, till 
after weary sufferings and long imprisonment they gained themselves the 
martyr's crown. This is what makes Norbury so dear and so wonderful : 
it is the home of martyrs. 

The remarkable reticulated panelling of the oak parlour is seen in 
Mr. Pike's beautiful sketch. 

There is not much else of interest in the building, save the ancient 
stained glass, poor fragments of the magnificent display which must once 
have filled the windows of the Manor House. These have additional 
value because it would seem that they were inserted by the martyr, 
Sir Thomas Fitzherbert, Fifteenth Lord of the Manor. In a circle in the 
entrance hall is a splendid shield containing the arms of Sir Thomas 
himself, impaled with those of his wife, Anne Eyre, heiress of Padley. 
Another circle represents the scourging of our Blessed Lord, and is 
pronounced by Mr. George Bailey to be Dutch work of the middle of 
the sixteenth century. There is also a mutilated Nativity of Christ, and 
six circles representing the first six months of the year.* 



NORBURY CHURCH 

THE gallery that connected the Manor House with the Church has 
now disappeared, as we have seen, though much of it was still standing 
at the beginning of the nineteenth century. 

It will be unnecessary here to give an elaborate description of this 
very beautiful and remarkable Church, as this has already been done by 
an expert.f That it is of rare beauty will be acknowledged by all who 
examine our illustrations. Its ground-plan is quite unusual, and Dr. Cox 
has explained how this came about. Originally an aisleless Norman 
Church, it was entirely rebuilt in the fourteenth and fifteenth cen- 
turies Some large fragments of pre-Norman crosses, finely sculptured, 
were found at the last restoration, so that an earlier Church even than 
the Norman one must have once existed here. 

' Mr. Bailey has given an elaborate description and careful coloured drawings of all 
these fragments of stained glass in the fourth and fifth volumes of the Journal (1882-1883). 

shire t A^hi-ological X S " " "' "^ ^^<>'> and ^ 7* <* *e Derby- 

10 




r 1 
erf 

w 



s 




FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The Dedication to St. Burlok (or Barlac), an utterly unknown Saxon 
Abbot, also speaks of the early foundation of the Church. 

There is a representation of this Saint in one of the windows, but 
only guesses can be made as to his identity. Though St. Burlok is 
mentioned in pre-Reformation Fitzherbert wills as patron of the 
Church, in later days it has often been described as dedicated to Our 
Lady. 

The chancel is by far the most striking part of the Church, indeed 
its beauty takes away the breath of those who visit it for the first time. 
It was probably built, according to Dr. Cox, in 1360, though Mickle- 
thwaite ascribed it to an earlier date, just before the outbreak of the Black 
Death in 1349. But the former's opinion is no doubt correct, and he 
shows that the building of this magnificent chancel is probably due to 
the rector, Henry Kniveton, a man of wealth, to whom there was formerly 
a slab in the floor, stating that he was, in fact, the builder of the chancel. 
This slab, apparently, disappeared during the disastrous "restoration" of 
1842. Kniveton was presented to the rectory by Sir John Fitzherbert in 
the year of the Black Death, 1349, and his successor, another Henry 
Kniveton, was not instituted till 1395. Between these dates the chancel 
was probably built. The general effect of this chancel is one of extreme 
lightness and elegance. The magnificent windows, four on either side, 
are filled with the original fourteenth-century glass in grisaille, covered 
with interlacing scrollwork and floriated designs, relieved here and there 
with colour, and having the shield of arms of a noble Lancastrian family 
inserted in each light. Some beautiful specimens of these windows 
appear in Lysons' Magna Britannia, and in Bournan's Specimens of the 
Ecclesiastical Architecture of Great Britain. 

Dr. Cox says with truth that "there certainly are not six parish 
churches in the kingdom that have so fine and extensive a display." 
Unhappily, the glass of the great east window, said to have been the 
finest of all, was sold about 1824 by the parson, the Rev. Thomas 
Bingham, to some Catholic family in Yorkshire. This window was 
blocked up with lath and plaster till the "restoration " of 1842, when it 
was filled with fifteenth-century glass taken from the nave and chapels. 

This was far from being a fortunate expedient. The glass was 
naturally damaged in removal, the original plan of the glazing of the 
Church was destroyed, and the beautiful colour-scheme of the fourteenth- 
century glass injured by the juxtaposition of much later work. Still, it 
is difficult now to suggest a better plan, for modern glass would have 
been still more out of harmony with the old. 

The figures of the twelve apostles were taken trom the west and 
three north windows of the north aisle, and the representation of the 
12 




C/3 

<; 

w 

w 
E 
h 

S 

o 



O 

PH 

D 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

Blessed Trinity now in the centre light, as well as the figures of SS. Chad 
and Fabian, from the south-west chapel. The apostles had each a scroll 
bearing an article of the Creed, according to the ancient tradition of 
its composing, but these have got confused in the transfer. The east 
window of the north aisle, we may add, contained three virgin saints, one 
of them St. Margaret, probably that now in the east window. The clerestory 
windows were filled with the heraldic bearings of the Fitzherberbs. 

Below the windows of the chancel runs a series of cinquefoil-headed 
blind arches, and a low stone seat extending along the whole of the 
wall. A considerable portion of good fifteenth-century oak stall-work 
still remains to enhance the beauty of this exquisite chancel. Unfortu- 
nately, the screen is modern and poor. 

The Fitzherbert tombs, which form the great glory of the chancel at 
present, are not in their original position, but come from the nave ; and 
before describing them, we had better give some account of the Church 
as a whole. The ground-plan is peculiar, the position of the tower in 
the centre of the south aisle being all but unique. There is indeed a 
striking dissimilarity between the chancel and the nave of the Church, 
the latter dating nearly a hundred years later than the former, and being 
of a much more commonplace design. The present nave was built by 
Nicholas Fitzherbert, Eleventh Lord of Norbury, who, as we have said, 
died in 1473. ^ n n ^ s e pitaph occur the lines : 

"This Church he made of his own expence 
In the joy of Heaven be his recompence." 

The north aisle is separated from the nave by an arcade of four bays, 
while the south aisle consists of the tower (the lowest story of which 
forms the porch), and a chapel to the east and west. The length of the 
nave is about 50 ft., that of the chancel about 47 ft. 10 in. 

Dr. Cox thinks that the tower was built before the present nave, in 
the first half of the fifteenth century, and that when the nave was rebuilt 
with clerestory and north aisle, somewhat later in the century, the chapels 
east and west of the tower were designed " to produce as near an 
approach to an aisle as possible, without removing the tower." 

John Fitzherbert, Thirteenth Lord of Norbury, grandson of Nicholas, 
built the south-west chapel, in which his tomb is placed, and from his will, 
dated September 21, 1 5 1 7, we find that this work was then " newe made. 

The rebuilding of the nave made it necessary to change the pitch of 
the chancel roof, which was lowered, and the chancel arch probably 
disappeared at the same time. The rector, Henry Prince (1466-1500), is 
said upon his tomb (an alabaster slab in the chancel) to have done this 
work, at least as regards the roof. The roof was lowered and the walls 

13 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

slightly raised, while the quaint battlements with pointed edge, which it 
has been fancied may have been suggested by the heraldic bearing, vaire, 
borne in the chief of the Fitzherbert shield, were added as a finish. The 
initials-N. F. constantly repeated in the quarries of the glass now in the 
east window, together with the rose en soldi of Edward IV., show that 
the nave was completed about 1450. Other quarries bear J. F., and come 
from the south-west chapel, which is now used as a vestry. The east 
window of the south-east chapel has a window, representing St. Anne 
teaching Our Lady to read, with St. Winefrid on the right and St. Syth 
on the left. Below are the arms of Fitzherbert impaling Bothe, and 
figures of Nicholas Fitzherbert with his eight sons (in blue) and Alice 
Bothe, his first wife, with her five daughters, kneeling on either side. In 
the south window are found the enigmatical St. Burlok with St. John 
Baptist and St. Anthony. Sanctus Burlok Abbas is depicted in a red cope, 
with crozier and book. Below, on either side of the shield of arms, are 
Nicholas with his two sons, and his second wife, Isabel Ludlow, with 
two daughters. This window commemorates the second marriage and 
its offspring. 

In the account of the Church written by Michael Jones in the Family 
Book, we get a valuable description of the glass then remaining in the 
Church, before it was removed from its original position. 

The following paragraph also makes us regret the ill-starred 
" restoration " of 1 842 : 

"The screen of curiously carved oak, with much curvilinear tracery, 
which has been painted in red, blue and gold, separates the chancel from 
the nave. Similar screens and canopies occupy the spaces between the 
arches both on the south and north aisles forming chapels in which are 
placed the tomb of Nicholas Fitzherbert on the south, and the tomb of 
Ralph Fitzherbert and his wife Elizabeth Marshall on the north." 

The most ancient Fitzherbert monument is that of Sir Henry, builder 
of the Hall. This is a stone effigy representing the good knight clad in 
chain armour and surcoat, and cross-legged. When Michael Jones 
wrote in 1828, this figure was on the north side of the chancel near the 
east end. In the seventies it was put in the middle of the chancel, it has 
now been removed to the archway leading into the south-east chapel of 
the nave, where the monument of Nicholas Fitzherbert formerly stood. 

The Fitzherbert monuments have been moved over and over again, 
in the most reckless way imaginable. In 1 842 they were removed to 
the eastern extremity of the chancel, by the then rector, the Rev. Clement 
F. Broughton. The Communion table was brought forward into the 
chancel, and the space behind railed off to hold the monuments. 

We now come to the two tombs, which make the chief glory of Norbury 
H 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

Church, and which are now placed on either side of the chancel. There 
are few parish churches in England that possess two such tombs as these. 
Our illustrations give an excellent idea of their beauty. They are pre- 
cisely similar in treatment and appear to be of the same date. Dr. Cox 
has shown that they were probably erected by John Fitzherbert, Thir- 
teenth Lord of Norbury, to the memory of his grandfather, Nicholas, and 
his father, Ralph, towards the end of the fifteenth century. They are 
" obviously the work of the same sculptor or school of Nottingham 
sculptors in Chellaston alabaster," and must have been made after 1483, 
which is the date of Ralph's death. 

Nicholas, the great builder, lies on the south side. His effigy, deli- 
cately carved in alabaster, is in plate armour, the hands are joined as in 
prayer, the hair is straight, the head resting on a helmet, the vizor punc- 
tured with round holes. The helmet is surmounted by a wreath from 
which rises the Fitzherbert crest, the clenched left hand within a gauntlet. 
He wears the collar of suns and roses with a lion pendant, which also occurs 
on the brass of his brother-in-law, Roger Bothe, in Sawley Church.* The 
sword-belt is beautifully ornamented with rosettes, and from it are sus- 
pended the long sword and the dagger, both perfect. The feet rest upon 
the figure of a lion. A tiny angel holding a shield sits on the lion's 
back and supports the tip of the right foot. The two figures at the west 
end of the tomb represent the two wives of the squire. Names were 
originally painted beneath these and all the figures on the sides of the 
tomb. Some are yet fairly decipherable. Very exquisite are these little 
figures under their crocketed canopies. On the south side are the eight 
sons by the first wife, Alice Bothe. One is in armour, with a cross upon 
his shoulder, one a monk, another a lawyer, and so on. 

The five daughters, with the two sons and two daughters of the 
second marriage, find their places on the north side of the tomb. One is 
a nun with veil and rosary. 

On an alabaster slab in the chancel floor is an incised effigy of Alice 
Bothe, the mother of thirteen of these children. The tomb of Ralph 
Fitzherbert is wider than that of his father, for with him is represented 
his wife Elizabeth, the heiress of John Marshall, of Upton. In her will, 
which (as well as that of her husband) still exists at Swynnerton, she directs 
that her body should be " buried in the Churche of Seint Barloke by fore 
the ymage of Seint Nicholas by syde the body of RaufFe ffitzherbert late 
my husband, f 

The figure of the squire is nearly an exact counterpart of that of his 

* Cox, "Journal \ xxv. 

( Printed by Rev. R. H. C. Fitzherbert in the Journal, vol. xx. An abstract of 
Ralph's will is in vol. xix. 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

father, but the hand in the crest is a right hand, and he has no dagger. 
He too wears the collar of Edward IV., but the pendant is a boar, the 
cognizance of Richard III. The lady is dressed in a close bodice and 
gown which has been painted green, and a mantle painted red. She has 
a reticulated cap, gilt, with high double-peaked head-dress. Round her 
neck is a chain from which hangs a pendant representing Our Lady and 
the Holy Child. Ralph's feet rest on a lion, but instead of the angel 
there is a curious crouching figure of a little monk or bedesman supporting 
the right foot. At the lady's feet are two small dogs. Two angels sup- 
port the cushion at her head. At the west end of this tomb are three 
angels holding large shields. On the north side are six niches ; the first 
contains the figure of a Knight of St. John ; in the sixth are two boys. 
Each of these figures has a shield. 

According to Sir Ernest Clarke, F.S.A., the seven sons here repre- 
sented were John the eldest, Henry, Thomas, Richard, William, 
Anthony, and one who died in infancy. This is the order in which they 
are named in their mother's will, and it is no doubt the order of their 
birth. But they are not represented in that order on the tomb. First 
comes the Knight of Rhodes, Richard, the fourth son ; then an ecclesiastic, 
probably Thomas, the third son ; he became Rector of Norbury (1500- 
1518) and Precentor of Lichfield Cathedral. Next is a pilgrim, who is 
possibly meant for John, the heir ; then a civilian with purse at his side, 
no doubt Henry, the second son, a mercer of London ; * the next three 
are boys of whom (if we are correct) one will be William, the fifth son, 
who became a distinguished ecclesiastic, Prebendary of Hereford and 
Lincoln, Chancellor of Lichfield and Rector of Wrington, Somerset ; while 
another will be the sixth surviving son, Anthony, the most famous of all. 

William and Anthony were minors at the time of their mother's 
death (her will is dated 20 October, 1490), and John is directed to pay 
to the ktter the sum of five marks per annum " towards his exhibition at 
Court " (i.e. his studies at Gray's Inn) " upon condition that he continue 
his learning at the same." He did so to some purpose, for he became 
one of the most learned of English judges.f 

The great blue stone slab with brasses that now lies between the 
tombs of Nicholas and Ralph Fitzherbert, is the monument of Sir 
Anthony and his second wife, Dame Maud Cotton. It has been moved 
from the gangway of the nave. Unhappily it is incomplete : the judge's 

* He was admitted a member of the Mercers Company in 1483, after an apprentice- 
ship to John Matthew Alderman. 

f It will be noticed that the eastern ends of the tombs of both Nicholas and Ralph 
J-itzherbert are bare of ornament. This would not have been seen had they been left in 
their original positions, built against the eastern pillar on either side of the nave. 

16 




I 



f* 
w 
oa 
& 
w 
ac 
N 



JH 

s 

2-i 

j 
< 
(K 

fe 

Oj 

M "* 
S 

Si 

-*' 

a ^ 

K J 
h^ 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

head is missing, as well as a great part of the marginal inscription. In 
1871 Dr. Cox made the discovery that fragments of the brass, then loose, 
were "palimpsests" or re-used fragments of older brasses from some 
religious house. At the time of Sir Anthony's death such memorials 
must have been drugs in the market, owing to the destruction of the 
monastic churches.* 

The Latin verses below were composed, it is said, by Sir Anthony 
himself. Some think that the two pieces of brass on which these verses 
are inscribed have been wrongly placed in recent years, and that the 
inscription should begin with the line, 

I lie ego qui quondam Juerat dum vita suferstes, 

which is now the seventh line. 

Dr. Cox gives an English translation by Mr. Sankey, then of Marl- 
borough College, from which we quote some lines : 

"A lifetime's deeds are all that here I have 
Who by my words am followed to the grave ; 
Though erst a judge, now at the bar I stand, 
And wait the judgment of a juster hand. 
But, holy Christ, hear ! for thyself dost pray 
My pardon grant and wash my sins away." 

His five daughters are represented kneeling below, with their names, 
and the text, Misericordias Domini in eternum cantabo, but the corresponding 
piece with the figures of the five sons, three of whom were such glorious 
champions of the faith, has unhappily disappeared. 

These sons were Thomas, John, Richard, who married Mary 
Westcott, and William, who married Elizabeth Swynnerton of Swynner- 
ton, and brought that property to the Fitzherberts. The eldest son, 
whose name is unknown, died young. (According to some writers, 
there were two who died young.) 

Of the daughters, two died young ; and of those who survived, 
Dorothy married Sir Ralph Longford, and secondly, Sir John Port ; 
Elizabeth became the wife of William Bassett of Blore ; and Katherine, 
of John Sacheverell. They were all counted worthy to suffer much 
for the faith. 

The marginal legend, when complete, read as follows : 

" Of your charitie pray for the soule of Sir Anthony Fitzherbert 
Knight one of the King's Justices of the Commen benche and sometyme 
lorde and patrone of this Town and Dorothie his wyfe Daughter of Sir 
Henry Willoughby, Knight and Dame Maude his last wife one of the 

* Mr. St. John Hope has described this brass and its inscriptions in the "Journal, vol. iv. 
He gives a good illustration. 

C I 7 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Daughters and heirs of Richard Coton of Hampstall Rydware Esq. by 
whom he had five sonnes and five daughters which Sir Antony deceased 
the 27 May A Dni 1538 & the said Dame Maude . . ." 

The only other monument we need mention is that of John Fitz- 
herbert, Sir Anthony's eldest brother. While he provided such splendid 
sepulchres for his father and grandfather, he was himself contented with 
a very simple monument. It is a plain altar-tomb, with alabaster sides, 
in the south-west chapel. A brass plate on the upper slab bears his 
name and the date of his death, the Vigil of St. James, 1531. 

There is very much more that it would be interesting to describe in 
and about Norbury Church, but we are compelled to pass it over in 
order to tell something of the history of the family and of its sufferings 
for the faith.* 

Here, too, we must pass over much that is interesting. The story 
of John Fitzherbert and his quarrel with his brother, Sir Anthony, his 
unhappy marriage, his authorship of the famous Boke of Husbandrie and 
the Boke of Surveying and Improvements (London, 1 523), so long attributed 
to his "brother justice," but now vindicated for their true author by 
Sir Ernest Clarke,t besides much that is interesting about Nicholas 
and Ralph Fitzherbert must be perforce passed over here for lack of 
space. 

The piety and charity displayed in the Fitzherbert wills are not, 
indeed, extraordinary for the period, but are sufficiently interesting to be 
briefly noted here. Thus Ralph Fitzherbert, in his will (dated December 20, 
1483), commends his soul to God the Father Almighty, to Blessed Mary 
and All His Saints, and leaves seven pounds of wax to be burnt round 
his body at his obsequies, bequests to every priest (4^.) and every 
clerk (^.d^j assisting at his funeral, and legacies to the fabrics of the 
Cathedrals of Coventry and Lichfield, to the Church, priests, and poor 
of Norbury, SnelJeston, and Cubley, to the Abbot and Convent of 
Rocester and Croxden, the Prior and Canons of Colwich, the Vicar of 
Ellaston, and to the churches and the poor of these places. Also to the 
Prior of the Friars' House in the villa of Derby, IDS. to celebrate a 
trental (i.e. the thirty Gregorian masses) for his soul, and a like bequest 
to the Abbot and Convent of Croxden, and to Sir Thomas Harding, 
priest.^ 

His widow, Elizabeth, makes much the same provisions, bequeathing 

* Here again we must express our obligations to Dr. J. Charles Cox, F.S.A., who has 
made a special study of this history. 

t Dr. J. M. Rigg, in the Dictionary of National Biography, argues for Sir Anthony's 
authorship, but he has been refuted by Sir Ernest Clarke. 

t The original Probate copy is at Swynnerton. See Journal, vol. xix., abstract by 
Rev. R. H. C. Fitzherbert. 
18 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

besides sums to the fabrics of the churches of Sibbesdon, Yoxall, Duffield, 
Colwich, and Rocester : 

" Item, I bequeath to the Abbot and Convent of the abbey of Darley 
to pray for my soul for a trental to be said for my soul icxr. Also I 
bequeath to the finding of a priest to pray for the soul of Ralph Fitz- 
herbert late my husband, and for my soul ^10 of money beside the 
rent of Calton. Also I bequeath to seven priests at the trust and 
disposition of mine executors to pray for my soul 465. 8^/., that is to wit to 
every priest 6s. %d. to say Placebo and Dirige every night and mass on the 
morrow during that year, and every Priest to be assigned to his day by 
mine executors. . . . Also I will that my said feoffees retain and keep 
in their hands lands and tenements to the yearly value of 205. to find 
an obit yearly at Norbury for my said husband's soul, my soul, our 
fathers' and mothers' and all Christian souls. And that the said 205. 
be disposed in this wise : first, to every Priest there being at Dirige 
and mass 4 d ; and to every clerk there being i d . And that that re- 
maineth over at any time to be laid out in purchase of bread and 
divided among the poor parishioners of Norbury, by the discretion 
of my said son and heir, and curate of the church for the time there 
being."* 

John " leaves thirteen pounds of wax to be used in as many tapers 
1 abowte my herse,' two tapers to burn night and day upon the herse 
till the seventh day was past. Every man, woman, and child at the burying 
to have a farthing white loaf and a penny of silver. On the seventh day 
after, both priests and clergy to have on the same manner, and the poor 
folk as before." He leaves bequests for masses to a great many religious 
houses, among others to every house of Austin Friars and to every 
Charterhouse in England. He does not forget even the ringers of the 
bells, and he leaves "to Norbury Church 20 marks to buy a cope of 
velvet, and a vestment branched of one colour." The list of heirlooms 
appended to this will is exceedingly interesting. It forms an inventory 
of all the better furniture in the Manor House ; as well as " for 
husbandry and other things necessary," oxen, pigs, horses, sheep, 
ploughs, tools, wheat, barley, rye, &c. Never was there such a curious 
list of " heirlooms " ! Among other things we find " a pair of wafer 
yrons," for making and stamping hosts for the altar.f 

Dr. Cox points out that this was done by John Fitzherbert, no doubt 
at Sir Anthony's suggestion, to outwit his wife " Bennet," or " Bene- 
dicta," with whom he had quarrelled. He thus made almost all his 

* Original Probate copy at Swynnerton. See Journal, vol. xx. 

f This will is not at Swynnerton. We owe the above details to Dr. Cox. Journal, 
vol. vii. pp. 226-239. 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

chattels heirlooms, giving them in his lifetime to Richard Cotton, " one 
of his executors, and then resuming the use of them on loan." 

Before leaving this beautiful church, it is only right to say that it is 
now excellently cared for by its present patrons, who have spent much 
money in repairing it and in re-leading the old glass. 



CONFESSORS OF THE FAITH 

SIR ANTHONY FITZHERBERT forms the link between the old order and 
the new. He lived through some of the most troublous days of 
Henry VIII., saw the religious houses dissolved, the martyrs slain, and 
England torn from the unity of Christendom. He was born in 1470, and 
succeeded his brother John as Fourteenth Lord of Norbury in 1531. He 
had been knighted in 1516, and in 1522 was made a Justice of the 
Common Pleas. His biography has often been written. His fame of 
learning as a lawyer was surpassed only by the renown of his probity, 
for he was known far and wide as an upright judge. 

" Though he never attained to the position of Chief Justice, Fitz- 
herbert possessed a profound knowledge of English law, combined with 
a strong logical faculty and remarkable power of lucid exposition. His 
Grand Abridgement of the Common Law, first printed in 1514, was the 
first serious attempt to reduce the entire law of England to systematic 
shape. As such it served as a model to later writers." * 

Nevertheless we have to own with regret that, as a Catholic, he did 
not take that firm position which brought such immortal glory on 
Sir Thomas More. Though he never acquired monastic lands, and 
cautioned his children against doing so, he took a prominent part in the 
suppression of the monasteries, and his name is on the list of Commis- 
sioners to take the surrender of Abbeys, dated 29 Henry VIII. 1537. 
He was one of those who received the surrender of the Abbeys of 
Whalley and Furness, only a year before his death. Worse than this, 
he was on the Commission which tried the most illustrious of our 
Blessed Martyrs; on April 29, 1535, he assisted at the trial of the 
Blessed Carthusian Priors, Blessed Richard Reynolds of Syon,f and 
Blessed John Hale ; and he was also a member of the tribunals that tried 
Blessed John Fisher and Blessed Thomas More in the following- Tune 
and July. 

As to this, Mr. Gillow remarks that " notwithstanding the 

Dr. J. M. Rigg in the Dictionary of National Biography. 

t In 1503 he had been appointed feoffee in trust for the Abbess and Convent of Syon 
20 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

disgust which the conviction of those two Martyrs universally excited, 
Fitzherbert's reputation sustained no blemish, the world knowing that 
his being on the Commission was an act that he could not prevent, and 
that his interference with the will of the arbitrary despot would have 
been both useless and dangerous. His judicial character had been raised 
whilst on the circuit at York by his having allowed bills for extortion to 
be found against Wolsey, then at the height of his power. For this he 
was rebuked by the Cardinal. He also disapproved of the Cardinal's 
alienating the Church lands." 

This is quite true ; and that the family tradition as to his Catholic 
faith and piety is really correct is best proved by the magnificent constancy 
of his children and descendants. 

Sir Anthony died, as his tomb tells us, on May 27, 1538 ; his widow 
survived him thirteen years, dying September 29, 1551. 

The old judge passed his last days in retirement at Norbury, meditat- 
ing, as we have seen, on death and judgment to come, and we cannot 
doubt that in his case the last prayer of Blessed Thomas More was 
fulfilled, when he said to his judges, after his condemnation in 
Westminster Hall, that he hoped in the Divine goodness and mercy, 
that, as St. Paul and St. Stephen, whom he persecuted, were now friends 
in Paradise, so he and they, though differing in this world, might be 
united in perfect charity in the other. 

Dodd, in his Church History, has placed Sir Anthony Fitzherbert 
among his Catholic heroes, and though we may grieve that the judge 
did not rise to that sublimity of self-sacrifice to which his own sons 
attained, yet we feel that his name is not unworthy of our veneration. 

But if Sir Anthony was not himself heroic, his eldest son, Sir Thomas, 
who succeeded him as Fifteenth Lord of Norbury, was one of the 
most glorious of our Catholic confessors, and died a martyr in chains. 

Sir Thomas Fitzherbert was born in 1517 or 1518, and succeeded 
his father at the age of 21.* His mother was Sir Anthony's second 
wife, Maud or Matilda Cotton. The mansion, demesne-lands and advow- 
son of Hampstall Ridware, County Stafford, came to him at her death in 
1551. Shaw gives a description of Sir Thomas' great house at Hampstall 
Ridware, as it was in 1792 : Two octagonal porters' lodges in stone 
flanked the gateway, from which a paved way ran across the court to 
the main entrance. This was protected by a porch 20 feet in length 
supported on pillars, and a massive front door. The great hall had an 
immense dining-table running down one side, with a bench fixed against 
the wall, a high arched fireplace with cast metal fire-back embossed with 

* According to Topcliffe's pedigree he was the third son of Sir Anthony, two elder 
brothers having died in infancy. But it is more probable that he was the second son. 

21 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

armorial bearings, iron dogs, &c., a very lofty roof, and a musician's 
gallery at mid-height. Circular windows lighted it at one end. A 
watch-tower, fifty feet high, had a staircase which communicated with 
the principal apartments. 

It is interesting to know that one of the bells in the church tower bore 
(and doubtless still bears) the inscription : 

" Syr Thomas Fiharbor Knight 
God presarve him in all right." 

To the Fitzherbert and Cotton Manors, Sir Thomas added the wide 
estates of Padley and Hathersage in the Peak of Derbyshire, by his 
marriage with Anne, sole daughter and heiress of Sir Arthur Eyre of Over 
Padley. The marriage settlement is dated October 20, 1535. It is still 
preserved at Swynnerton. Among the stained glass still left in the Manor 
House of Norbury is a splendid shield bearing the arms of Sir Thomas 
Fitzherbert, impaled with those of his wife (quarterly, Padley and Eyre), 
and with another shield (quarterly argent and sable, over all a bend gules 
charged with three annulets or), which it seems impossible to identify. 
This would seem to suggest that Sir Thomas had a second wife, but 
there is no mention of this in any family record, and it seems more 
probable that these arms belong to some alliance of the 
Eyres, and that it is simply a piece of bad sixteenth- 
century heraldry.* In any case, he was childless. His 
wife, Dame Anne Fitzherbert, died in 1576. 

It was Sir Thomas who adorned the windows of 
the Manor House with the heraldic glass, which excited 
the admiration of Laurence Bostock in 1581. It must, 
indeed, have been a splendid display. Sir Thomas' 
shield, which we here give from the Fitzherbert 
Pedigree at Swynnerton, displays the Eyre arms on an escutcheon of 
pretence. 

In 1546 Sir Thomas was appointed Sheriff of Staffordshire (the 
original Letters Patent of November 23, 1546, are at Swynnerton), and 
he again filled that office under Philip and Mary in 1554. It is not 
certain when he was knighted, but he is styled knight in a deed of 
April 4, 1552. He was appointed in this year (6 Edward VI.) one of 
the Commissioners to take survey and inventory of Church goods and 
ornaments in the Hundreds of Offley and Pirehill ; f and in the Lichfield 
Chapter Acts we find recorded (January 27, 1552-3) that he was one of 

* Mr George Bailey has given a coloured reproduction of this shield. Journal 
vol. v. p. 05. 

t W. Salt Library, Stafford, vol. vi. pt. i. p. 176. 
22 




THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

the Commissioners who took from the ministers of that church an 
inventory of the jewels, vestments, &c., and sold them fro vilissimo pretio, 
placing the best jewels and vestments under seal for the King. 

This act of sacrilege must have been exceedingly repugnant to Sir 
Thomas, who for the remainder of his life was to prove himself an 
ardent, open, and inflexible adherent to the faith of his fathers. 

From a letter among the Lansdowne MSS. in the British Museum, 
written by Sir Thomas to Sir William Cecil (afterwards Lord Burghley) 
it would appear that Sir Thomas acted as agent or auditor for Cecil's 
estates at Wootton-under-Weever, near Norbury. This letter is dated 
January 8, 15567. Its tone is that of an equal, though Sir Thomas 
calls himself an " officer " of Cecil's. At this time, it will be remembered, 
Cecil feigned to be an excellent Catholic. It was not long, however, 
before he was to throw off the mask. 

In the first year of Elizabeth (1559) an Act of Parliament was passed 
for " restoring to the Crown the antient jurisdiction over the estate 
ecclesiastical and spiritual," that is to say, for abolishing once more the 
Papal Supremacy, and restoring to the Crown the jurisdiction over the 
Church usurped by Henry VIII. Though Elizabeth shrank from 
proclaiming herself " Supreme Head," she arrogated to herself all the 
spiritual pretensions of her father, with the title of " Supreme 
Governor." 

By this Act the Queen was authorised to name, by Letters Patent, 
under the Great Seal of England, Commissioners to exercise ecclesiastical 
jurisdiction, "and to visit, reform, redress, order, and correct all such 
errors, heresies, schisms, abuses, offences, contempts, and enormities 
whatsoever," which by any manner of spiritual authority could lawfully 
be reformed, &c., within the realm. 

The oath of supremacy, acknowledging the Queen's new title, and 
renouncing any other spiritual or ecclesiastical authority, was to be taken 
by all ecclesiastical persons, all and every judge, justice, mayor, and every 
other lay or temporal officer employed by the Crown, and the penalty 
for refusing to take it was loss of all offices and all civil rights. At the 
same time the Act of Uniformity made the Book of Common Prayer 
the only authorised manual of worship, prohibited any other rites, and 
enforced, under severe penalties, the attendance of every person at the 
new services. In a word, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass had become a 
crime in England. 

Thus began, somewhat mildly at first, but with ever-increasing 
severity, the persecution of those who clung to the old religion, and 
whose consciences would not permit them to assent to the Queen's 
proceedings. 

2 3 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Dr. Cox, himself an Anglican clergyman, speaks of it as follows : 
" A general policy of outrageous and long-continued oppression, before 
which the short-lived and fierce Marian persecution absolutely pales in 
comparison. . . . This page of our national history has been generally 
slurred over, through ignorance or wilful suppression of the truth, by 
most of our historians. The facts are beyond dispute ; . . . almost 
every persecution short of death (which was soon added to the other 
penalties by the legislation of 1571 and 1584) was resorted to immediately 
after Elizabeth's accession ; the Recusants were everywhere harassed by 
fines, forfeitures, and imprisonment, in order to compel their attendance 
at church. Where the local magistrates were lax in their efforts, Special 
Commissioners, armed with the fullest powers immediately from the 
Crown powers, which in their full use of torture, as well as in other 
respects, more closely resembled the Inquisition than anything hitherto 
established in England visited the disaffected districts, or had the 
delinquents summoned before them in London. This phase of the 
persecution was specially severe between 1561 and 1563, particularly in 
Derbyshire and Staffordshire." * 

Another Anglican clergyman, Dr. Jessopp,f writes : " At the acces- 
sion of Elizabeth there were not wanting many men of conscientious 
convictions, who would have boldly faced the scaffold rather than 
acknowledge the claim of the spiritual supremacy of the sovereign. . . 
The oath in its new form became the cause of deep and widespread 
offence. A very large proportion of English gentry refused to swear 
allegiance in the terms prescribed. These men were from this time 
known as Recusants,^ or refusers of the oath, and the stigma and 
inconvenience attaching to the term began then first to be felt in its 
odious force. 

" But the Act of Uniformity was one which touched the Catholics 
in a different way. The re-establishment of the Mass in Queen Mary's 
reign had caused immense joy throughout the land . . . now it was 
enacted that the Book of Common Prayer alone should be used, and 
'to sing or say any common or open prayer, or to administer any 
sacrament otherwise . . . than is mentioned in the said book ... in any 
cathedral or parish church or chapel, or in any other place ' subjected 
the offender to forfeiture of his goods, and on a repetition of his offence, 
to imprisonment for life. The Mass was felt to be, and known to be, 
the one great and precious mystery which every devout Catholic clung 

* Journal, vol. vii. pp. 243-4. 
t One Generation of a Norfolk House (1879), P- 63. 

t It is more usually stated that the term " Recusant " arose from the refusal to go to 
church, and this seems more correct. 

2 4 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

to with unspeakable awe and fervour, and to rob him of that was to rob 
him of the one thing on which his religious life depended ; that gone, 
it was imagined that all else would go with it. ... 

" But there was yet another clause in this Act, which was even more 
galling and hateful than the others. The fourteenth clause enacted that 
any person not resorting to his parish church on Sundays and holy days 
was to forfeit twelve pence for every offence, the money to go to the 
poor of the parish. The Churchwardens were bound to present offenders 
to the Ordinary." * So far Dr. Jessopp. 

Sir Thomas Fitzherbert had the honour to be one of the first victims 
of these detestable laws. Already in 1561 the good knight was sent up 
to London by the Queen's Commissioners and imprisoned in the Fleet, 
where he had as fellow captives the last Catholic Bishop of Chester and 
the last Catholic Dean of St. Paul's. " For thirty years," says Dr. Cox,f 
" Sir Thomas Fitzherbert, with only three brief intervals of freedom, was 
dragged about from prison to prison, now in the Fleet, now in the 
county gaol at Derby, now at Lambeth, and now in the Tower, in 
which State prison he finally died in 1591 at the age of seventy-four. At 
any moment he could have obtained his release by consenting to attend 
church." 

We can trace his name through State papers and Privy Council 
Acts, and get glimpses now and again of the weary imprisonment endured 
to the end with so much heroic fortitude. 

On July 12, 1563, Grindal, Bishop of London, writes to Cecil : 
" Your second letter was for Sir Thomas Fitzherbert. He is a very 
stiff man. We had a solemn assembly of Commissioners in the end of 
the term only for his case, where Mr. Chancellor of the duchy was 
present, and there concluded to let Mr. Fitzherbert be abroad upon 
sureties, if he would be bound in the mean time to go orderly to the 
Church, without binding him to receive the Communion. That Sir 
Thomas refused. We will have a new conference upon occasion of 
your letter, and consider the circumstances of his case and after certify 
you of the same." 

Sir Thomas was still a prisoner in the Fleet in 1565, when Sir 
Thomas Chaloner made an unsuccessful suit for him to the same Bishop 
of London,^ and he was still there in 1570.$ 

* By an Act of 1581, in addition to this, those who absented themselves from church 
for over a month had to pay to the Exchequer a fine of 2.0 for each lunar month of four 
Sundays (i.e. 260 a. year) as long as they remained Recusants or had anything left to lose. 
If they kept in their house any inmate guilty of such absence they were to forfeit 10 for 
every such month. 

t Three Centuries of Derbyshire Annais (Bemrose, 1890), vol. i. p. 252. 

\ S. P. Dam. Eliz. xxxvii, I. Ibid. Ixvii. 86. 

D 25 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

In 1568 we get a glimpse of him in connection with a fellow prisoner, 
the Venerable Bishop of Peterborough, Dr. David Pole. This good 
Bishop died in the Fleet Prison probably in May 1568. 

In his will, dated May 1 7, he appoints Sir Thomas as his executor-in- 
chief, and stipulates that, in case he should not be able himself to take 
action, the others should in all things defer to him. With Sir Thomas, 
the Bishop named, as co-executor to his will, " Mr. John Wilkinson, citizen 
of London." Foreseeing, however, that it might not be possible for 
Sir Thomas to execute the will "in his own person," he appoints in 
that case, Martin Audley, his servant, "to do all things therein as the 
said Sir Thomas shall appoint him, as his deputy, and to make reckoning 
to the said Sir Thomas of all things that he doth." The Bishop also 
states " that the said Sir Thomas shall not need to appear before any 
judge about the execution " of the will, and in case of this being required 
he wills him " utterly to be discharged thereof and that the said Martin 
be full executor with Mr. Wilkinson to do all things." Yet even in this 
case he desires Sir Thomas to confer with Mr. Wilkinson about the due 
execution of his wishes. 

To each of his executors, the Bishop leaves " seven pounds in money," 
"a gilt goblet" and a ring ; a ring also is left to Lady Fitzherbert. 

The will was sworn to on the following July 6 by John Lewis, public 
notary, on behalf of Sir Thomas Fitzherbert ; and by John Wilkinson 
and Martin Audley.* 

A knight imprisoned in the Fleet had to pay the sum of 185. 6d. for 
his weekly commons and wine, besides is. \d. a week for his room ; 
charges equivalent to ^10 a week in modern money. 

The weary imprisonment had its natural effect on his health. At 
a meeting of the Privy Council, May 2, 1574, a letter was sent 
to the Archbishop of Canterbury (the same Edmund Grindal) to use 
his discretion upon a suit made for the enlargement of Sir Thomas 
Fitzherbert for two months, in respect of his sickness, and disposing of 
his lands and goods. f 

The latter motive was probably the more effective with the Council. 
The prisoner had still to pay the crushing fines levied on Recusants, 
and if he was " enlarged " from time to time, it was chiefly that he 
might find the means of raising this money by the sale of lands or 
goods. 

In a list of " Evil-disposed persons of whom complaint hath been 
made, which lurk so secretly that process cannot be served upon them," 
printed by Strype, is mentioned " Robert Grey, priest, who hath been 

* Phillips, Extinction of the Ancient Hierarchy, pp. 285-91. 
t Privy Council Acts, vol. viii. p. 234. 
26 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

much supported at Sir Thomas Fitzherbert's. . . ." " Then, we are 
informed, that through the example of Sir Thomas Fitzherbert . . . and 
others ... by us committed to prison, . . . and through the bearing 
and succouring of their wives, friends, &c., a great part of the shires of 
Stafford and Derby are generally ill-inclined towards Religion." 

The Privy Council, July 26, 1581, wrote to the Bishop of London 
" to licence Sir Thomas Fitzherbert for this summer time to repair to 
his house, upon good bonds and sureties in a round sum to her Majesty's 
use, that he shall not admit into his house any person not conformable 
in Religion, nor repair to the houses or company of any which refuse to 
come to the church and conform themselves, and that he shall at 
Michaelmas next either return to his Lordship and the place from 
whence he is released, or bring him a testimonial from his Ordinary of 
his conformity." * 

Whether he was willing at this time to give these bonds, does not 
appear, but the summer of the next year found him at his dear Norbury, 
but very sick. How grievous it must have been to him no longer to 
be able to hear Mass in his beautiful parish church among the tombs ot 
his Catholic ancestors ! Still we may be sure that the Holy Sacrifice 
was offered secretly in some garret of the old Manor House, for Norbury 
is constantly denounced at this period as being a lurking-place for Popish 
priests. 

As to Padley, it was inhabited by Sir Thomas' next brother, John 
Fitzherbert and his family, who were equally devoted to the old Religion. 

The Council wrote, June 18, 1582, to Sir Walter Aston and Sir 
Thomas Cockayne of Ashbourne, as follows : " Whereas Sir Thomas 
Fitzherbert, knight, of late prisoner for matters of Religion, and at his 
humble suit, and the ordering of his private affairs, hath been permitted 
upon bonds and sureties to repair to his own house for a time, and to 
return his body to the prison of the Fleet at the latter end of this term ; 
forasmuch as their Lordships are given to understand by letters from 
Sir Thomas Cockayne and other of the Justices of the Peace in that 
county, that the said Sir Thomas is at this present in so feeble state by 
sickness as he may not, without apparent danger of his life, travel hither to 
yield himself prisoner according to his bond, their Lordships have thought 
good to pray and require the aforenamed Sir Walter Aston and Sir Thomas 
Cockayne forthwith to think upon some gentleman of good and sound 
Religion, residing within the county where Sir Thomas is now remaining, 
who will be contented to receive him into his house and take charge of 
him as of a prisoner, until he may recover his health, or our pleasures shall 
be further signified, and thereupon to cause the said Sir Thomas imme- 

* Acts, vol. xiii. p. 139. 

27 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

diately to be conveyed unto him, giving him charge by authority hereof 
that he suffer not any Recusant to frequent the company of the said 
Sir Thomas, or to have conference with him, unless it shall be on 
necessary occasions, at which time the said Sir Thomas shall have speech 
with any such Recusant only in the presence and hearing of his guardian ; 
and further, that like regard be had that the said Sir Thomas be not 
suffered to infect or corrupt others that are already good subjects and 
well persuaded in Religion, which we hope shall be prevented by your 
care in the choice of the gentleman to whom you shall commit him. 

" Their Lordships also send herewith the copy of a condition for a 
bond their Lordships think fit that they should take of him for his 
remaining true prisoner in the place where they shall place him, per- 
mitting him to have such liberty as in the said condition is mentioned, 
and to send unto their Lordships the bond that they shall take of him, 
to the end his other bond whereupon he remaineth may be cancelled." * 

Unhappily the Register of the Privy Council is missing from June 26, 
1582, to February 19 1585-6, so that we lose sight of the valiant 
confessor of Christ during some of the fiercest years of the persecution. 

An undated paper in the Record Office,f calendared under July 
1582, but perhaps of earlier date, gives an inventory of Catholic books 
found in the prison cells of some of the principal Recusants. It is 
extremely interesting to see the kind of books which nourished the 
piety and sustained the constancy of these good laymen. 

Mr. George Cotton (of Warblington) had a long list under his name : 

Expositio Canonis Miss<e, Gabriel Biel, 410. 
Testitnonia Sacr<e Scripture Patrum. 
Concordantits, etc. per Konygstein Minoritam, 8vo. 
Catechismus Romanus. 
Joannis Vit<e Speculum, 15. 

* Acts,vo\. xiii. pp. 449-450. ( S. T. Dom. Ellz. cliv. 75. 

Dom Cuthbert Almond, O.S.B., has very kindly helped me to identify most or 
these books : 

Expositio Canonis Miss* is Sacri canonis miss<e exfositio brevis et interlinearis sc Expositio 
eximit viri Magistri Gabrielis (Biel of Spires). Str.isburg. 

Concordant^, _ etc. per Konygstein, is the Monotessaron evangeliorum of Konyestein 
otherwise Antomus Broickwy. 

The Catechismus Romanus is perhaps that of B. Canisius, S.J. 

Joannitrit* Speculum is one of the "first monuments of typography probably printed 
by Gutenburg. Explicit humaneque salutis summula plane a me fratie Johanne tut pater 
ordimi a/me mr b ndicte puto quasi minimo monacho. There are editions of 1476, 1402 &c 

Syntaxes Historic Evangelic* is the Historic Evangelic* Veritai of Alan Cope L Arch- 
deacon Nicholas Harpsfield, a confessor of the faith). Louvain 1572 

Chronograph Christian* Ecclesi* may be " Chronographia " : a description of time . 
colle, out of sundne authors, but for the most part abridged and translated out 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

Syntaxis Historic Evangelic^ Alani Copt, 410. 
Chronographia Christiana Ecclesite. 
Martyrologium Usuardi, 8vo. 
Surii Cartusiani Historia 5 volum. leaft behind. 

A paper wt a red hart &c. 

A crucifix pictured set on a burd. 

A written treatise of divinite beginning 

In c<eteris etc. and endeth Laus Deo. 

In the same chamber, 

Sir Thomas Fitzherbert had : 

Antidotarium Anto : Sariceti. 
Diurnale Romanum. 
Manuals confessariorum. 
Pharetra divini amoris. 

Other prisoners mentioned are Mr. Erasmus Sanders who had 
Blessed Thomas More's Dialogue of Comfort in Tribulation, Thomas a 
Kempis, Our Ladyes Psalter, &c., and Mr. Anstey who had only one,, 
viz. " Certayne devout and godly petitions called Jesus Psalter." 

We only know from this casual circumstance that Sir Thomas shared 
his cell in the Fleet with a like-minded friend, that stout old confessor 
George Cotton, of whom we shall hear more in the course of this book. 

Among the deeds relating to Norbury preserved in the family 
archives at Swynnerton, are several connected with Sir Thomas Fitz- 
herbert. Of these the most important, from the point of view of the 
family pedigree, is No. 25, being an Exemplification of Letters Patent of 

of Codomannus his Annales Sacrae Scripture . . . London by Richard Field for 
Robert, 1590. 

Martynlogium Usuardi, possibly the edition of Florence, 1486. 

Surii Cartusiani Historia, will probably be the Cologne edition, 1570, or 1581, in six 
volumes. 

The Antidotarium is Antidotanus Animtf by Nicolaus de Saliceto, printed at Antwerp 
by Gerard Leen, 1490 (and at Louvain, 1490). 

Manuale Confessariorum by Johannes Nyder. The best known edition is that of John 
of Westphalia (c. 1481), or that of 1485. There is a Paris edition, 1473, folio. 

Pharetra Divlnl Amoris, probably St. Bonaventura's treatise generally entitled Liber 
Salutaris Pharetra I'ocatus, printed at Paris by Rembolt, 1518. 

OurLadyis Psalter may be St. Bonaventure's Psa/terium b'tif I 7 irginis, imprinted at London 
in Flete Aley the XXI daye of October by Simon Uoter (c. 1520), or perhaps a translation 
of this work. 

The Certayne devout and godly petitions called Jesus Psalter, is probably the edition 
Antwerpite Johan. Foulerum, 1575. 

Sir Thomas More's Dialogue of Comfort In Tribulation (written in the Tower of London) 
and Thomas a Kempis are too well known to need comment. 

29 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

28 November, 23 Elizabeth 1580, of the pleadings in a suit of the 
Court of Arches in which Sir Thomas was plaintiff against Nicholas 
Browne, farmer of the tithes of Norbury. The record recites the 
original charter of the Prior of Tutbury granting the Manor and two 
bovates of land in Norbury to William the son of Herbert, subject to 
the payment of 55. in lieu of tithes ; and enumerates by name the 
successive Lords of the Manor in their descent from the said William 
down to the plaintiff. Sir Thomas established his claim to exemption 
from tithes upon payment of the said annual sum of 55. The genealogy 
of the family is thus legally authenticated. 



THE GATHERING OF THE STORM 

WE now come to the year 1585. Dangers on all sides threatened the 
Government, and its agents were more on the alert than ever. Spain 
was overcoming the resistance of her rebellious subjects in the Low 
Countries, and the fall of Antwerp in July 1585 caused a feverish 
anxiety among the English Protestants. 

War with Spain was inevitable, and eventually an English force 
under the Earl of Leicester was sent to support the rebels. France, or 
rather the Duke of Guise, threatened invasion on behalf of the captive 
Queen of Scots. Walsingham's toils were closing round that hapless 
princess, and the last act of her long-drawn tragedy was at hand. But 
the true heir to the throne had many faithful adherents in the country, 
and the plots to release her from captivity were a constant anxiety to the 
Government, though not, perhaps, to Walsingham, whose spies acted as 
agents provocateurs in fomenting the conspiracies which he used to involve 
the Queen of Scots and her friends in a common ruin. 

Here, as ever, the Catholics had to surfer. Special Commissioners 
were appointed to " deal with the said Recusants to deliver the true state 
of their livings, revenues and livelihoods, that thereby a proportion 
might be made to allow them that which might be thought convenient 
for their maintenance, and the rest to be answered for the penalties they 
incur by breach and offence against the lawes."* 

A little later they were assessed to provide mon ey " towards the provid- 
mg of horses and furniture for her Majesty's present services in the Low 
Countries," i.e. towards the war now being waged, under the incom- 
petent Leicester, in support of the Protestant rebels against Spain. It 
was stated that "her Majesty seeth so much the less cause to spare them 
in this and the like charges, as that she daily findeth them to bestow no 

* Acts Privy Council, vol. xiv. p. 8. 
30 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

small contributions, both within and without the Realm, towards the 
feeding and maintaining of such her evil affected subjects as are sent and 
continued within the Realm to practice the overthrow of her Majesty's 
quiet Government." * 

The State papers still preserved give abundant evidence how search- 
ing and universal this new exaction became. In October 1585, we have 
catalogues of the names of the Popish Recusants in each diocese, with the 
number of lances and light horses to be assessed upon each. At the 
same time we get quantities of letters from the unhappy Recusants to 
Walsingham protesting their inability to meet the demand, as they are 
either in prison, or their whole living has been already exhausted by the 
fines for recusancy. 

Some, indeed, were able to fulfil the demand, others offered sums of 
money instead. 

On October 26, Sir Thomas wrote from Hampstead to Walsingham 
explaining that the Earl of Shrewsbury, Lord Lieutenant of Derbyshire, 
and the Sheriff and Justices of Staffordshire, had already seized his 
armour and horses, and requesting a warrant of discharge. It was, in 
fact, the usual thing to disarm all Catholic gentlemen. 

This letter seems to have been without effect. Accordingly, on 
November 19, Anthony Radcliffe, Sheriff of London, wrote the 
following letter to the all-powerful secretary, explaining the situation. 

Sir Thomas had provided as many as four light horse, quite an un- 
usual number. But he now sought to compound with a sum of money. 

The letter runs as follows : 

" Right honourable, my duty remembered, &c. 

" Whereas, by your former letter Sir Thomas Fitzherbert was 
nominated amongst the rest without any number of horses appointed in 
the schedule, yet notwithstanding, by persuasion, he yielded unto the 
service of four light horse, and sent for them from his houses out of 
the counties of Derby and Stafford. Sithence which time one of them 
hath miscarried, and findeth the rest not serviceable as he would wish, 
as also he allegeth his armour to be in the hands of the justices of these 
two Shires. Wherefore he hath required me to write unto your Honour 
to accept of ^50 (the which he hath paid unto me), and that it would 
please you that he might have your Honour's letter unto the Sheriff of 
the two Shires before written for his discharge there." f 

This is followed by a letter from Sir Thomas himself to the Secretary 
(a facsimile of the original being appended) : 

* Acts Privy Ccutcif, vol. xjv. pp. 15, 87. f $ P- Dom. Eliz. clxxxiv. 34. 

31 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

" I do think myself bound so to thank your Honour for that great 
goodness I have found in you, even at your first sight and acquaintance 
with me, and since in your tending my poor estate, which would to God 
it were simply laid before your Honour as in truth it is, and as my good 
Lord Treasurer hath an abstract thereof. My annual rents are under 
three hundred pounds, and I pay largely thereof yearly above two 
hundred pounds. In truth and in my conscience, the meanest Esquire 
in Derby and Stafford Shires (the counties where my poor living lieth) 
are better able to abide exactions, and to live in their callings than I 
am, and yet not one more willing (though I say it) to serve her Majesty. 
Good Sir, I humbly require you to pity me, as you have mercifully 
begun with me, but even as the truth and equity of my estate shall 
deserve. 

" I do find in your Honour (as I have often heard of you) a courteous 
nature and mild disposition. Therefore I dare boldly yield me to your 
Honour's prescript and determination in all things present and to come ; 
with this my most humble request that if your Honour do not credit 
sufficiently this my sincere and free report of my very estate, that it may 
like you to make a trial of it, and so to credit and use me as your 
Honour shall then try me. 

" The Almighty preserve you in honour and long happy life. 

"Hampstead, this 2oth of November, 1584." 

Then follows a postscript, written in hastily, and somewhat hard to 
decipher : 

"I would fain carry this old mortified body of mine whence I 
brought him of late, if it might so like her Majesty and your Honours 
all. Howbeit, I never dare or will ask anything further [?] than shall 
seem good unto you, save only mercy and pity towards my old age." 

It would seem that this pathetic letter had some effect, for on 
January 15, 1585-6, he was released on bond, and though we find 
him apparently still in Middlesex in March, it seems that a little later 
he was allowed to retire, broken in health, and half-ruined in fortune 
for a few months' repose to his beloved Norbury. 

Though a prisoner, Sir Thomas had, of course, to pay the exorbitant 
fines levied on Recusants who" refused to attend the Anglican services 
In March he and some other of the wealthier Catholics attempted to 
purchase a dispensation from Elizabeth. It is computed that the Queen 
made no _ less than 20,000 a year by such dispensations.* It was 
3bably, m reply to a question from the authorities as to how much 
* Charles Butler, Historical Memoir, of the English Catholics, vol. i. p. 292. 



ft 



.VI 



,vp3~ (V*o*fl 

f^.J 



\ fJS Jf V7 ^p"V\ T*nr*- 7rVW*~ f^y* ^'7,**^ j x-*vir- \igrrr* t*> 

,< jl^ fr f(^fr*T^Qnv^f^v- ^.4 ,-** t ,vx^ny^ ^C 
C^CJ^*! -^*^ ^y^~f$y*fi* f}tf* "* VM ^" ^Ty-i**rf 
^^/T' VVT ^;" <Y*(V^(^nSkw*J- : (?* f' xr >' ? yfvff 'I^V^ 

\' , /) : /I - . 1 - ^ rV-^ A, , , ~/ 

^_ ^4 ( \^^-/ 

' ^~*t^ / ***^ ^^ C"^- 

>tv, ^c^mnnfB fY^nf^ -v> , |,M^ .'(Gr*# R. 

Q^*^'^** < 5S!* lr ^-t'* k ^ > >*" *~ (piV**ft* .~nV 

r v r C: C^// _ ~ I! _; ^ ) 

^r*H J 7," 



t 



}$~**.ati' 

-^^^^(W^-r, 

(Vv^- (* 




^^^ Vf U 

<*.w 'iwrr^Jgfc? 
fc ^ 4 *>*v/ ,^< 

a y^fa ?~ ( 

("H*-* * !* 



r*>. 



r* 1 * 1 ^. 



* .v' < C^* j *7 X^ ^ p^t-* v/fe?- pt5s? xr,vWw^*vv^ W t/.* 

~ 'V ' ^ "" ^ ^/ * >* / 

4W>A5-.w,X /H^*i^jfasj/^r.-. c tr^wSvJ? t N^^ Pfejfe^-j . 

^-^ V . "">" V^ /v / V % / --'"^ <T 

/V<- 9*>f jJ/'/i-tyy*^ fc^fe^fX^^^fw^^a^^tr^ 

_J*i'^ f&ffL. r . -o'ir^ rvi.:^L _.<t 




^fa&*? 



HOLOGRAPH LETTER OF SIR THOMAS FITZHERBERT 

TO SECRETARY WALS1NGHAM TO face page 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

they would be willing to pay to compound for the recusancy fines, that 
we get the following letter. 

On March 14, 1585-6, Sir Gilbert Gerard, Master of the Rolls, 
and Sir Owen Hopton, Lieutenant of the Tower, sent to the Council, 
" an abstract of the offers made by the Recusants remaining in London 
and Middlesex to be paid yearly unto her Majesty to be freed from the 
penalty of the Statute." * 

The name of Sir Thomas Fitzherbert heads the list of twenty- four 
names. He writes as follows : 

" Sir Thomas Fitzherbert, Knight, in respect that there is a great 
charge going out of his living which he saith is not above 263 55. jd., 
and the charge going out thereof to divers persons is above ^203, yet 
notwithstanding he is content to offer of his own free will yearly the 
sum of ,40. 

"(Signed) THOMS FFYTZHERBT." 

Some of the other " offers " may be added. Lord Vaux offered ^80, 
Sir John Arundell, Sir Thomas Tresham, and Dame Elizabeth Poulet, 
100 each, Katherine Bellamy, widow, 10, John Gifford, of Chillington, 
66. 

It does not appear whether these offers were considered satisfactory. 
It is noteworthy that Sir Thomas Fitzherbert, with scrupulous honour, 
actually valued his "living" higher than the official valuation, which 
was only 200 a year. It could not have been found easy to extract 
260 a year in fines out of this estate, already so greatly burdened, so 
that, perhaps, her Majesty was graciously pleased to be satisfied with the 
offer of 40. At least we may hope that the old knight was allowed a 
few months of peace at Norbury, before the greater trials that were 
coming burst on him. 

In August, 1586, we find him at Norbury, very sick. The horrors 
of a long imprisonment in Elizabethan days are better imagined than 
described. No wonder that the poor old man, now nearing three score 
years and ten, should have been " very weak and indisposed in bodie, 
not able to travel as yet without further danger of his person." He was 
therefore graciously permitted by my Lords of the Council to remain 
" at any of his houses either in Derbyshire or Staffordshire for the space 
of three months . . . without breach of his bond wherein he standeth 
bound to the Queen's Majesty." f 

This bond had been dated January 17, 1585-6, and he was at last 
able to present himself again before the Council on February 4, 1586-7. 

* S. P. Dam. EKz. clxxxvii. 48. t Acts, vol. xiv. p. 212. 

E 33 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

He was enjoined not to depart until he should be dismissed by their 
Lordships.* He had had just a year of comparative liberty. 

But now the great tragedy of his life was about to overwhelm him. 
The story is a very terrible one. " Have I not chosen you twelve and 
one of you is a devil ? " these words of our Blessed Lord seem to ring 
in one's ears, as one studies the story of the Fitzherberts. 

The children of John Fitzherbert, like their father and uncle, were to 
suffer many things for the love of Christ and to be faithful unto death, 
but one of them was a traitor, nay, a devil. Thomas, the eldest surviving 
son (really the third, for two older boys had died in childhood) was his 
uncle's acknowledged heir. The deed of entail made by Sir Thomas, 
after his wife's death, had secured his wide estates on this nephew and 
namesake. He had married in 1578, Elizabeth, daughter of John 
Westby of Mowbrick,f County Lancaster, the staunchest of Catholics, who 
suffered imprisonment for the hospitality he showed to Blessed Edmund 
Campion. It was on the occasion of this marriage that Sir Thomas 
entailed his property on his nephew. Fortunately the marriage was 
childless, so that no future Fitzherbert was to have the traitor's blood in 
his veins. 

Thomas Fitzherbert, we do not know when or how, but probably at 
the time he was imprisoned in Derby gaol for recusancy, about 1583, 
fell into the hands of one of the greatest villains who ever lived, Richard 
Topcliffe, the priest-catcher. This detestable scoundrel persuaded him 
to plot against the life of his father and uncle in order that he might 
inherit their estates. He persuaded him that if he did not take speedy 
steps the whole property would be forfeited for recusancy so that he 
would never enjoy it. As a matter of fact, before Sir Thomas Fitz- 
herbert's death in the Tower, he had been mulcted of two-thirds of his 
property. 

The treachery was the more horrible, as Sir Thomas had brought up 
his nephew from childhood as his heir, and loaded him with every 
kindness. But Topcliffe knew how to terrify by his threats as well as 
to fawn and cajole, and no doubt the wretched young man had some- 
how put himself in the villain's power : Topcliffe was the prince of 
villains. At any rate, we know by the miserable young man's own 
avowal that he "entered into a bond to give 3000 unto Topcliffe 

* AC A ! ' V u' X ' V ' P ' 3l8 ' Durin S the time he was waiting on the Council's commands 
he stayed at Hampstead, as we learn from the Interrogatory cited below. 

t The marriage settlement is at Swynnerton. It should be noted that a deed of 20 
January, 9 Lhz. 1567, stipulates that if Sir Thomas and Dame Anne Fitzherbert should 
die without heirs of the body of the said Anne, Padley should go to the use of the right 
heirs of the said Sir Thomas. 

34 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

if he would persecute his father and uncle to death together with 
Mr. Basset." * 

Mr. William Basset was his uncle by marriage, having espoused 
Elizabeth, daughter of Sir Anthony Fitzherbert. His estates were at 
Langley, County Derby, and Blore, County Stafford, and he was a man 
of means, besides being a good Catholic who suffered fines and imprison- 
ment for the faith. 

In any case, Topcliffe busied himself to fulfil his part of the bargain. 
In the Privy Council Acts is a letter (dated March 26, 1587), "to 
Mr. Rookeby and Mr. Herbert, Masters of the Requestes, that whereas 
Sir Thomas Fitzherbert is charged with sundry things contained in 
certain articles which this bearer, Edmund Brown, shall deliver, their 
Lordships have thought good to require them to send for the same 
Sir Thomas to come before them, and to examine him upon the said 
articles." One of the Councillors who signs this letter is the Earl of 
Shrewsbury.f 

This attempt to bring the confessor to a traitor's end proved 
unsuccessful, but the conspirators, foiled in this, turned their attention 
elsewhere. Thomas Fitzherbert's one thought was how best to secure 
for himself the family estates. To gain these he stuck at nothing. 
Topcliffe aided him, in order to secure his own ends, for to the older 
villain Fitzherbert was but a tool, to be thrown aside when no longer 
useful. Padley was to be his own prize, " a delightful solitary place " 
where he intended to end his days. 

We find the next move in a letter from the Council (September 6, 1587) 
to the Lord Chief Baron and Justice Wyndham, which declares that they 
are informed "that there are divers suits and controversies depending 
between Sir Thomas Fitzherbert, knight, and Thomas Fitzherbert, his 
nephew, concerning certain fraudulent estates pretended to be made of all 
the inheritance of the said Sir Thomas, only to defeat the said Thomas, 
who ought to have the same by way of remainder, and that there is 
extraordinary proceeding against him for that purpose by Privy Sessions 
held in Staffordshire and otherwise." Their lordships therefore "thought 
her Majesty would take it well, if they (the Judges) took due regard and care at 
the Assizes next to be holden at Stafford, and at all other times hereafter, that 
he were dealt withall in every of his causes according to conscience and the equity 
thereof." J 

It is difficult to know whether to admire more the hypocrisy or the 

* Jessopp, op. cit. p. 71. 

t It is just possible that the Interrogatory quoted below belongs to this period, but there 
are substantial reasons for referring it to a later date. 
I Acts, vol. xv. p. 226. The italics are our own. 

35 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

effrontery of this admonition to the Judges to favour the cause of this 
unnatural traitor, her Majesty 's protegt. 

A careful study of the Fitzherbert deeds preserved at Swynnerton 
shows the steps that Sir Thomas took in attempting to save the family 
estates from falling into the hands of the traitor and his accomplice. The 
process is very complicated, and it would need a somewhat profound 
knowledge of the law at this period to understand properly all its details. 
But we think we can give the story with at least fair accuracy in such a 
way that it may be understood by the general reader.* 

On April i, 1578, Sir Thomas, being then a childless widower, made 
settlement of the manors of Norbury, Hamstall Ridware, and his other 
property, upon the marriage of his nephew, Thomas Fitzherbert. The 
lands were settled to the use of Sir Thomas for life ; remainder to his 
brother John Fitzherbert for life ; remainder to Thomas and his heirs 
male by Elizabeth Westby ; remainder to his younger brother, Richard 
Fitzherbert of Hartsmere, County Stafford, in tail male ; remainder 
to Humphrey Fitzherbert of Uphall, County Herts. f 

So it remained, until October, 1583, when Sir Thomas must have 
received clear proofs of the worthlessness of his unhappy nephew. There 
are deeds of October i, October 10, October 17, and October 19 of this 
year. The general effect of these is that Sir Thomas combined with his 
brother, John Fitzherbert, to pass over Thomas the traitor as far as they 
could, and convey the lands to Richard Fitzherbert. This appears to 
have been effected by the doctrine of collateral warranties, as we see both 
from the deeds themselves and from the petition of Thomas the younger 
hereafter quoted. 

On October i, Sir Thomas and John Fitzherbert leased Norbury, 
Padley, and the other estates, to Erasmus Wolsley of Wolsley, 
Esquire, and Richard Ensor of Abbots Bromley for one hundred years. 

This was a trust term. Perhaps the form of lease was used to evade 
the Statute of Uses. 

On October 10, Erasmus Wolsley and his fellow trustee granted the 
same properties in fee to Richard Fitzherbert of Hartsmere. 

On October 17, Sir Thomas conveyed the said manors and lands to 

* For help in this legal tangle I have to thank Francis de Zulueta, Esq., M.A.. Fellow 
of New College, Oxford. 

f Marriage Settlement at Swynnerton, No. 4. This is a very voluminous and interesting 
document. Jt bears the autographs and seals of Sir Thomas, his brother John, and his 
nephew, Thomas Fitzherbert. Also (as witnesses) those of Richard Fitzherbert, Anthony 
Fitzherbert, and Thomas Fitzherbert of Swynnerton, the future Jesuit, besides that of 
Martin Audley and others whose names come prominently into this history. Sir Thomas' 
seal bears an antique head, which is the seal he generally uses ; John Fitzherbert's has a 
deaths-head, and Thomas the younger has the crest of the family 
36 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

Richard Fitzherbert in fee simple, i.e. to his heirs and assigns for ever. 
On October 19, John Fitzherbert did the same. 

Then on February 17, 1583-4, Richard Fitzherbert made a re- 
settlement conveying the said manors and lands to trustees, John Harpur 
of Swarkeston and others, to hold to the following uses : 

First to the use of Sir Thomas Fitzherbert for seventy years, if he should 
so long live, after his decease to the use of John Fitzherbert for sixty 
years, or the term of his natural life, then to trustees for Thomas 
Fitzherbert, nephew, either for life, or as tenant at will (it is not clear 
which, for the statements in the deeds are contradictory). Remainder to 
Nicholas, younger son of John Fitzherbert, in tail male ; remainder to 
Anthony, another younger son of the said John Fitzherbert in tail male ; 
remainder to the heirs male of the body of Sir Anthony Fitzherbert, 
knight, deceased, father of the said Sir Thomas ; remainder to the right 
heirs of the said Anthony Fitzherbert for ever.* 

It was apparently impossible to cut the younger Thomas Fitzherbert 
out of all enjoyment of the property, but by putting it thus into the hands 
of trustees and making him their tenant at will, he would be prevented, 
it was hoped, from doing much harm. Apparently, however, all these 
elaborate safeguards were swept away by the judges at Stafford in 
obedience to the orders of the Council, and when Thomas finally came 
into the property he did so in virtue of the original settlement of 1578. 

He failed, however, in securing Padley, owing to the greater cunning 
of his accomplice. In Trinity term, 1590, he was induced to levy a fine, 
i.e. to make a conveyance of that manor and other lands to Topcliffe, as 
it would seem, in trust for his own benefit. This he did in order to 
defeat if possible Sir Thomas' attempts to disinherit him " by means of 
collateral warranties." 

An exemplification of the fine, granted in the Court of Common 
Pleas, dated Trinity Term, 1590, is preserved at Swynnerton. It bears 
Topcliffe's endorsement and signature. This exemplification is three 
years later than the fine itself, being dated November 6, anno 35 
Elizabeth, i.e. 1593, and we append a reproduction of this most in- 
teresting document, with Topcliffe's extraordinary signature attached. 

We give a transcript of the fine in the Appendix, as Elizabethan 
court-hand is far from easy to read, so it will be sufficient here to sum- 
marise the document. 

The deforciant, Thomas Fitzherbert, Esquire, grants to the plaintiff, 

Richard Topcliffe, Esquire, and to his heirs for ever, the manors of 

Over Padley and Nether Padley, on the Derwent, with six messuages, 

two cottages, ten gardens, ten orchards, a thousand acres of land, five 

* All the deeds quoted are preserved at Swynnerton. 

37 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

hundred acres of meadow-land, six hundred acres of pasture, three hun- 
dred acres of wood, a thousand acres of furze and heath (jampnorum 
et bruere\ etc., in Padley, Grindelford and Lyham, in the Parish of 
Hathersage, in consideration of eight hundred marks of silver. Four 
proclamations had been made of this fine according to statute, and the 
royal seal had been affixed on November 6, of the thirty-fifth year of 
Elizabeth, 1593. There is no mention of any trust in the deed, but, in 
any case, it would probably have been a secret one. 

Topcliffe, however, represented the transaction as a conveyance of 
the property for his own benefit, so that Fitzherbert was obliged to 
institute a suit in Chancery to compel him to disgorge. But this suit 
does not seem to have been successful.* 

The letter of the Privy Council quoted above, also informs us that 
Edward Browne, the informer, was bound for his appearance at the 
Stafford Assizes, but that he was wanted in London " to prosecute certain 
informations by him exhibited before their Lordships," and so that 
neither he nor his surety were to be " dampnyfyed " for his absence, 
as to the persons who were prosecuting him, they might do so in the 
King's Bench next term, if the Judges thought it convenient. Evidently 
the troubles of Sir Thomas were not yet over. This Browne must have 
been another tool of TopclifFe's. 

But to understand the proceedings taken against the Fitzherberts, it 
will be necessary to have some idea of the state of the law at this time, 
as it regarded Catholics. 

The penal statutes had gradually increased in ferocity, especially after 
the excommunication of the Queen by St. Pius V., and had been crowned 
in 1585 (27 Elizabeth, cap. 2) by a law which banished all priests from 
the kingdom, and enacted that if any priest ordained by authority of the 
See of Rome since the first year of Elizabeth, or any religious or 
ecclesiastical person should come into or remain in the Queen's 
dominions he should be adjudged a traitor and suffer accordingly. 
Furthermore, every person who should receive, relieve, or maintain 
any such priest should be adjudged a felon and suffer death and for- 
feiture as in cases of felony. Moreover, whoever should know of any 
such ecclesiastic being in the realm and should not disclose it to a Justice 
within twelve days, should be fined and imprisoned at her Majesty's 
pleasure, &c. &c. 

The great majority of our martyrs suffered under this infamous 

statute which immensely simplified the methods of the persecution. Nor 

this the worst. -The truth is," writes the Rev. Dr. Jessopp, a 

regn ***** ^"^ f Pr Ceedin8S in ^"^ in the 

38 




r \ X 

U O 

ft, 

o ^ 



oi. 



DG 



u s 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

detestable system had now begun to spring up, under which no one with 
any conscience or any religious scruples could hold himself safe for an 
hour. An army of spies and common informers were prowling about the 
length and breadth of the land, living by their wits, and feeding partly 
upon the terrors of others and partly upon the letter of the law as laid 
down in the recent Acts wretches who had everything to gain by strain- 
ing the penalties to the uttermost, for they claimed their share of the 
spoil. Armed with warrants from weak magistrates, who themselves 
were afraid of suspicion, or failing these, armed with an order from the 
Privy Council, which was only too easily to be obtained, they sallied 
forth on their mission of treachery. They were nothing but bandits 
protected by the law, let loose upon that portion of the community 
which might be harried and robbed with impunity. In some cases the 
pursuivants, after arresting their victims and appropriating their money, 
were content to let them alone, and save themselves further trouble ; in 
others they kept them till a ransom might come from friends ; in any 
case there was always the fun of half-scuttling a big house and living at 
free quarters during a search, and the chance of securing a handsome 
bribe in consideration of being left unmolested for the future. Chief 
among these miscreants was one Richard Topcliffe. The cruelties of this 
monster would fill a volume." * 



THE MARTYRS OF PADLEY 

BEFORE continuing our story, it will be well to make a pilgrimage to 
Padley, the home of Mr. John Fitzherbert, though the property of Sir 
Thomas. Situated in the parish of Hathersage, in the fairest part of the 
High Peak of Derbyshire, Padley (or Over Padley, as it is more correctly 
styled) lies at the very opposite extremity of the county to Norbury, 
close to the Yorkshire border. 

The immediate neighbourhood of the old Hall has been greatly 
spoilt in recent years by a railway line and station, but even now the 
surroundings are of rare beauty. Hathersage stands on the slope of a 
range of hills, an offshoot of the noted Stanage Edge, and the road from 
the village to Padley is a very beautiful one of some three miles, for the 
most part following the course of the river Derwent, which hurries down 
the valley through magnificent woods of giant chestnuts and oaks. 
All that is now left of the once splendid Manor House of the Eyres is 
the ancient Domestic Chapel built over the Great Hall. This Chapel, 
utterly neglected desecrated, indeed as it now is, almost a ruin, is 
* One Generation of a Norfolk House, pp. 69-70. 

39 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

nevertheless one of the most sacred of those Forgotten Shrines which 
this book attempts to make known. 

Not, indeed, that Padley is altogether forgotten. The secluded 
parish of Hathersage has ever been a stronghold of the faith, and there 
has never been a time when holy Mass has not been said in some secret 
corner of the district. To the little flock, hidden away in the heart of 
the Peak, Padley Chapel has always been a sacred shrine, and of late 




&&$*' v 
SB^** 



years it has become the goal of an annual pilgrimage under the auspices 
of the Guild of Our Lady of Ransom. On these occasions a Mass is 
usually sung in the old Catholic Church of Hathersage, a procession with 
crucifix, lights and banners is formed, and the faithful who have come 
from far and wide, pass with rosary and hymn and litany to pray at the 
sacred spot which sheltered the martyrs of Christ. At Padley the voice 
of a Catholic priest is once more uplifted in prayer and blessing, and the 
story of the martyrs who lived here is told again for the consolation of 
their children's children. The present writer had once the privilege 
of preaching at this pilgrimage. 

The following description of Padley Chapel is given by Dr. Cox, in 
his Churches of Derbyshire: * The old chapel, with the offices below it, 

* Vol. ii. pp. 252-3, 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

is the only part of Padley Hall now standing, with the exception of certain 
barns and outbuildings. It seems that the principal part of the old Hall, 
or Manor House, consisted of an enclosed quadrangle, the south side of 
which was formed by the chapel. Access to this court or quadrangle 
was gained by an arched passage through the lower story or ground floor 
of the building containing the chapel.* . . . The chapel occupies the 
upper part of the building, the floor-level being indicated by the base of 




THIS DRAWING SHOWS THE CHIMNEY IN WHICH THE MARTYRS ARE SAID TO HAVE 

BEEN HIDDEN 

the two narrow doorways closely adjoining each other, just over the 
archway. Access to these doorways must have been gained by stairways 
(perhaps of wood) that have now been removed. We see from the 
interior of the chapel that a substantial screen divided the building between 
these two doorways, and it seems probable that the one nearest the east 
end was the entrance for the family, and the other for the household 
retainers or neighbours. There was a third entrance " (scarcely shown 
in the drawing) " at the extreme east of this north side, into that part ot 
the Hall which there adjoined it, and there can be no doubt that this 
was the private door for the priest, communicating directly with his 
chamber. 

"There was also an external entrance to this angle of the chapel on 

* Our illustration on page 40 shows the north or inner side of the chapel, with the 
arched entrance to the courtyard built up. 

F 4 1 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

the east side, now hidden by a modern lean-to, which would enable the 
priest to quit the hall or chapel without going into any other part of the 
building." 

We also give a drawing of the south side of this most interesting 
shrine. 

" On the south side there is no entrance to the chapel, but the full 
size of the arched passage to the court can there be seen, and the two 
large buttresses, one on each side, which were ingeniously contrived by 
the architect to serve as chimneys. The offices on the ground floor are 
now used as a cow-house and stables, and the upper story or chapel as a 
barn for hay and other farm produce. The whole is much dilapidated. 
The main timbers of the roof are in fair preservation. There are four 
finely-carved hammer-beams, with wall pieces rising from stone corbels ; 
the two at the west end bear simple shields, but those towards the east 
end have well-designed shield-bearing angels." 

Mr. S. O. Addy, in his Evolution of the English House, mentions Padley 
as " being as good an example as can be found now of an ancient Manor 
House." He gives a ground-plan and two illustrations. He considers that 
the arched way divided on the ground floor the hall from the buttery, and 
was, in fact, the passage known in ancient houses as the "screens." On 
entering from the south, the hall was on the right i.e. at the eastern 
end of the building. The room on the left was the buttery or store- 
room. A buttress dying into the wall of this buttery has inside an open- 
ing of some size, probably used as a chimney. Mr. Addy thinks that 
the western end of the upper storey may have been the ladies' bower, 
but it seems probable that Dr. Cox is right, and that it was part of the 
chapel, screened off for the domestics and retainers. 

The old floor has been removed, and the present one is three feet 
lower than the old level. The east window is square-headed, of two 
lights ; it has been walled up, but the tracery is still intact. The piscina 
remains on the south side of the window. Here then John Fitzherbert 
and his family gained strength for the conflict before them, for he and 
his were almost as obnoxious to the authorities as Sir Thomas, and for 
the same reason : their steadfast adherence to the Faith. 

On January 29, 1587-8,^6 Lord-Lieutenant of Derbyshire, the Earl 
of Shrewsbury, a cruel persecutor of the faithful under his jurisdiction, 
wrote to John Manners, his brother-in-law and Deputy-Lieutenant, 
and Roger Columbell of Derby, ordering them to search for all 
Seminarists and other Papists lurking in the hundred of the High 
Peak, and to apprehend them. Also immediately to apprehend John 
Fitzherbert of Padley, his neighbour Richard Fenton of North Lees 
(another ancient mansion of the Eyres, near Hathersage), and two other 
42 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

gentlemen, and commit them as Queen's prisoners. Their destination 
was already decided on ; as to Mr. Fitzherbert, Dr. Cox prints from the 
Belvoir MSS. a letter of Shrewsbury's to one " Mr. Walton of Derbie, 
Preacher," dated Sheffield, January 29, 1586-7, in which he requires 
him "forthwith to receave into your charge and custodie the bodie of 
Jno. Fitzherbert of Padley gent, recusant and him safely to kepe as hir 
Maties prisoner upon his owne cost and charge untill furder order shal 
be given you in that behalf, Whereof faill you not as you tender hir 
Maj. service and will answer the contrary." * 

When, however, on Candlemas Day (1587-8), Roger Columbell, with 
a score of men, proceeded to Padley, he " made diligent search for Mr. 
John Fitzherbert, but could not find him." 

But this was only a brief respite, for to John Fitzherbert, as well as to 
his elder brother, the crown of martyrdom was destined by divine 
Providence. Meanwhile Anthony, his seventh son, was carried off to 
the pestiferous gaol at Derby, where he was soon at death's door from 
gaol fever, though not destined to succumb to it. 

Lord Shrewsbury seems to have suspected the fidelity of his agents, 
or the thoroughness of their search. Another raid was determined on, 
though a few months were allowed to elapse, perhaps in order to lull the 
victims into a fancied security. 

Behind the dignified figures of the Lords of the Privy Council and 
the County Magistrates, we discern the hateful form of Topcliffe, 
thirsting for his blood-money. The destruction of John Fitzherbert was, 
he knew well, only a question of time and patience. The son was in 
his toils, only too eager to betray his father. Once it could be proved 
that he had harboured a priest in his house, his condemnation was secured. 
And priests were constantly at Padley. 

At last, one summer morning, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass was 
celebrated in Padley Chapel by two priests, who with the Divine Victim 
offered the sacrifice of their blood. It was July 12, 1588, a notable day, 
perhaps the last day when Holy Mass was said in Padley Chapel. 

For on that day the long-expected blow fell on the fated house. 
"Padley," as Shrewsbury had written, " may be doubted much to be a 
house of evil resort," but up to this time the hunters had failed to find 
their prey. Now they had a Judas to aid them. Thomas Fitzherbert 
actually sent word to Lord Shrewsbury as to the day and hour when he 
would find his father at home. The Lord-Lieutenant came in person, 
and this time the raid was entirely successful. Not only did he capture 
John Fitzherbert, but he found even richer prey in the persons of 
the two holy priests who were concealed in the house. It is said 
* Three Centuries of Derbyshire Annals, vol. i. p. 259. 

43 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

that they were found in a hiding-place in the great chimney of the 
hall. 

These priests were the Venerable Servants of God, Nicholas Garlick 
and Robert Ludlam. Both were Derbyshire men by birth. 

John Fitzherbert, ten of his retainers, and the priests, were carried off 
in triumph and lodged first at Sheffield and then in Derby gaol. They 
had not long to wait for their trial. The priests were indicted, on 
July 23, of high treason, and their host of felony for harbouring them. 
Mr. Fitzherbert was condemned to death as well as his guests. It was, 
indeed, asserted that, as a matter of fact, he did not know of their 
presence in the house at the time ; but this did not save him. Nor, 
indeed, does it seem very likely. 

However this may be, John Fitzherbert's life was saved by his son- 
in-law, Thomas Eyre, of Holme Hall, who had married his daughter Jane. 
He sold his manor of Whittington, and with the help of other friends, 
raised the then enormous sum of ,10,000, with which he purchased a 
reprieve. " It is said," adds Dr. Cox, " that it was also stipulated that John 
Fitzherbert should be set at liberty, but, as this was a secret transaction, 
the recipients of the money could not be brought to task, and he died 
in prison." 

He remained for about two years in " that foul hole Derby Gaol, 
that always stank and bred corruption in the prisoners," according to 
Topcliffe's own testimony, and was then sent to London to the Fleet 
Prison, where he died in great destitution, November 9, 1590, having 
faithfully followed his brother along the Royal Way of the Holy Cross, 
but reaching the goal before him. 

Dr. Cox says that he died of gaol-fever,f and this point is important, 
as usually Rome will not afford to a confessor who dies in chains the 
honours reserved to martyrs, unless it can be shown that his imprisonment 
shortened his life. 

The priests had not to wait so long to gain their crown. In the 
prison they found a third priest, by name Richard Sympson, who had 
been condemned at the Lent Assizes, but whose life had been spared on 
his promise to go to church. But the influence of the newcomers was 
sufficient to make him repent of his weakness, and to make atonement 
by giving his blood. The Summer Assizes were held on July 23, 
and both priests were condemned. Two days later they won their 
crown. An eye-witness says that they met death " with much constancy 
and Christian magnanimity, without the least sign of fear or dismay." 

The Venerable Nicholas Garlick had been the master of Bishop 
Pursglove's Grammar School at Tideswell, in the Peak. He was an 
* Journal, vol. vii. p. 247. -j- Derbyshire Annals, i. p. 263. 

TT 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

Oxford man. Among his pupils at Tideswell were several future 
priests, and with them a martyr, the Venerable Christopher Buxton. 
Ordained at Rheims in 1582, Garlick was sent on the English Mission in 
January, 1583. Next year he was arrested and banished, but returned 
immediately to England. At his trial he was very bold. " I am not 
come to seduce," he told the judge, " but to induce men to the Catholic 
faith. For this end have I come to the country, and for this will I work 
as long as I live." 

" I thought," he exclaimed, as the three left the dock, " that Cain 
would never be satisfied till he had the blood of his brother Abel." 
Was the martyr thinking of the wretched young Thomas Fitzherbert ? 

The three priests were drawn on hurdles to the place of execution, 
by St. Mary's Bridge at Derby, close to the spot where Pugin's beautiful 
Catholic Church now stands. 

Garlick was merry and bright to the last. On the way to execution 
he was met by one of his friends who told him they had " shot off 
together." 

"True," said he, " but 1 am now to shoot off such a shot as 1 never 
shot in all my life." 

The martyrdom followed, with all the usual atrocities. It is said that 
Sympson showed signs of fear, but Garlick went before him up the ladder, 
kissing it, and, as the fire was not ready, he spoke to the people stirring 
words about the salvation of their souls. He closed his speech by 
casting among them a number of loose papers written in prison, which 
he declared would prove what he affirmed. It is said that every one 
into whose hands these papers fell was subsequently reconciled to the 
Church. 

When Venerable Richard Sympson was stripped for the quartering 
they found that he wore a shirt of hair, no doubt in penance for his fall. 
The third martyr looked on at the horrible butchery unmoved, even 
smiling. When he was upon the ladder, and just ready to be cast off, 
looking up to heaven with a smiling countenance, he uttered these his 
last words, as if speaking to saints or angels appearing to him, " Venite 
benedicti Dei " (" Come, ye blessed of God.") 

So died for Christ the martyr priests of Padley.* Their quarters 
were afterwards rescued from the bridge and reverently buried. Accord- 
ing to tradition the head of Fr. Garlick was interred in the churchyard 
of Tideswell. 

The following verses of an old ballad have often been printed, 

* For further details see Nicholas Garlick, Martyr, by Edward King, S.J. (Burns & 
Oates, 1904) ; also Padley Chapel and Padley Martyrs, by the Rev. F. M. Hay ward, of 
Derwent (1905). 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

but we cannot refrain from quoting them here. They are given by 
Bishop Challoner : 

" When Garlick did the ladder kiss, 

And Sympson after hie, 
Methought that there St. Andrew was, 
Desirous for to die 

" When Ludlam looked on smilingly, 

And joyful did remain, 
It seemed St. Stephen was standing by, 
For to be stoned again. 

"And what if Sympson seemed to yield, 

For doubt and dread to die ; 
He rose again, and won the field, 
And died most constantly. 

" His watching, fasting, shirt of hair, 
His speech, his death, and all, 
Do record give, do witness bear, 
He wailed his former fall." 

Meanwhile the time-serving Shrewsbury was making the most of his 
achievement. On August 9, 1588, a few days after the martyrdom, he 
wrote from Sheffield to his " deare Soveraigne " to report to her the state 
of the counties under his lieutenancy. All is well, for the most part. 
<l As for the others, recusants and bad members, order is given whereby 
they shall be more straitly looked unto. On Sunday last I was in those parts 
of Derbyshire, where I lately took John Fitzherbert and the other 
Seminaries, of purpose only to reduce into some good order the multitude 
of ignorant people heretofore by them seduced. Where at one sermon 
before me came above two hundred persons, whereof many had not 
corned to church twenty years before, and as many not since the 
beginning of your Majesty's reign. Beside them be two hundred and 
twenty which came not as yet, but I hope ere long, seeing their Captain 
is caught they will generally become more obedient subjects." He goes 
on to protest his loyalty : " Though I be old, yet shall your quarrel 
make me young again, though lame in body, yet lusty in heart to lend 
vour greatest enemy one blow and to stand so near your defence every 
way wherein your Majesty shall employ me." * 

* S. P. Dom. E/iz., ccxiv. No. 51. 



46 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 



THE CROWN 

MEANWHILE the traitor was straining every nerve to get his reward. On 
Sunday, July 21, the Privy Council wrote to Mr. Solicitor informing him 
that the young man claimed that his uncle, Sir Thomas, had conveyed 
unto him " long sithence " one half of the manor of Padley, and two 
parts of another manor. Mr. Solicitor was " to peruse the said evidence " 
and report.* 

He evidently feared that Padley would be forfeited to the Crown, as 
the possession of convicted felons. He also tried to prevent his uncle 
selling the timber on his estates, and obtained on July 24 a letter from 
the Council " to stay the felling or sale of such woods as Sir Thomas 
Fitzherbert hath growing on any of his manors," or, if already felled, to 
stay them there on the ground till further disposition were made.f 
However, it would appear that here he over-reached himself. Sir Thomas 
informed their Lordships that, "being indebted to her Majesty, he 
purposed to make sale of certain woods for the discharge of the said 
debt," and the Council were not going to stop such praiseworthy proceed- 
ings for any nephew's sake ; they therefore " thought meet the said Sir 
Thomas should be permitted to make sale, cut down, and fell such 
woods ... of his own as the laws of the Realm doth permit him to 
do." 

Padley had been seized by Lord Shrewsbury, not, as it would appear, 
for the Crown. Sir Thomas wrote to him "from London, this 28th 
day of May, 1589," as follows : 

" VERY GOOD LORD, 

" With all humble duty I crave leave in lowly wise to 
open my grief unto you. I suppose your Honour hath known me 
above fifty years and my wife, that was daughter and heir unto Sir 
Arthur Eyre. I trust I have been dutiful unto my Lords your grand- 
father, your father, and your Honour, and I have found your 
Honours all my good Lords, till now of late your Lordship entering 
into the house of Padley, found two Seminaries there all unknown 
to my brother, as was confessed at their death, and is since well 
approved by good testimony. Sithence which time your Lordship 
also hath entered upon my house at Padley, and the demesne thereof, 
seized all the goods of my brother's and mine that was in that house, 
amongst which I had certain evidences of a wood and meadow under 
Levin House called FawltclifF, which as I am informed your Honour 

* Acts Privy Council, xvi. p. 169. t Ibid. p. 177. 

47 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

hath entered upon and occupied, wholly to your use, though I had 
been possessed, and my wife's ancestors time out of mind. 

" Very good Lord, these things are greater than my present poor 
estate can suffer, or in anywise bear, I paying to Her Majesty the 
statute of recusancy, being 260 by year, which is more than all 
my rents yearly rise unto. Loath am I to complain of your Honour 
any way, wherefore I complain me first unto your Lordship, hoping 
you will deal so nobly and charitably with me as I shall be restored 
to my house, lands, and goods by your Honour, so I shall be fully 
satisfied and be able to pay her Majesty, and for ever bound to pray 
for your Lordship's life in all honour long to continue." 

On June 29, 1589, Sir Thomas, with other Recusants, was released on 
bail, " to return at or before the first day of the next term." 

Sir Thomas had been able to get no redress from Lord Shrewsbury. 
He therefore petitioned the Lords of the Council, and on July 7, they 
wrote to Lord Shrewsbury to restore to him " his farm called Padley, 
with his evidences and such things as appertained unto him." f Lord 
Shrewsbury was indignant at this and wrote on August 17 to explain 
that he or his tenants at Padley would pay the recusancy fines, and as 
this was all the Council cared for, on September 22 they approved of his 
proposal. But Sir Thomas still protested, and at last the Council gave 
him some redress. They wrote to Shrewsbury, December 28, "Sig- 
nifying unto his Lordship that he would do well to let a house of Sir 
Thomas Fitzherbert called Padley, that heretofore served for a receptacle 
and harbourer to Seminaries and Jesuits, to be tenanted by such as Sir 
Thomas should name, being known to his Lordship to be of no bad 
disposition. And if he should make choice of none such, then his 
Lordship to appoint with his consent some honest person to inhabit the 
same and occupy the ground, that might answer such rent to the said 
Sir Thomas that might conveniently be raised of the same, whereby he 
should have no occasion to complain of any wrong done unto him, 
and that inconvenience avoided that was not to be tolerated in these 
doubtful times." J 

It was easy (as Dasent remarks in the Preface to this volume of the 
Acts) to make a show of justice over a transaction, the real purpose of 
which was to secure the recusancy fines. 

The Spanish Armada had been destroyed at the very time that the 
martyrs of Padley were being executed at Derby. But there were fears 
of a renewal of hostilities, and this was now made a pretext for confining 

* Acts Privy Council, xvii. p. 319. f Ibid. p. 357. 

\ Acts, vol. xviii. p. 286. 
48 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 




. Ca/tk- 



J-Bxe i 



the principal Recusants in prisons distant from London. It was therefore 
arranged (March 13, 158990) that Sir Thomas Fitzherbert with fifteen 
other Catholic gentlemen of importance (the names include, those of 
Sir William Catesby, Gervase Pierpoint, John Towneley, Thomas 
c 49 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Newdigate, John Talbot of Grafton, and Thomas Throckmorton) should 
be committed to the charge of Richard Fiennes of Broughton Castle 
near Banbury. Those of the diocese of Winchester were sent to 
Farnham Castle, while others were incarcerated at Wisbech or in the 
Bishop's Palace at Ely. Yet, as Dr. Cox points out, Sir Thomas 
Fitzherbert was "so loyal to Elizabeth in matters temporal, that not- 
withstanding the heavy and repeated fines to which he had been sub- 
jected, he had volunteered to supply double the contribution demanded 
of his estate on the approach of the Armada." 

At Broughton, the Keeper was instructed to remove his wife and 
family from the house, not to allow his prisoners or their servants to 
carry swords, and only to take his prisoners out for exercise one at a 
time, and not more than a mile from the Castle. Their beds, chests, 
trunks, and apparel were to be carefully searched for papers. It adds a 
new interest to the beautiful old Castle at Broughton to know that these 
valiant confessors of Christ were, for a time, confined within its walls. 

Mr. Dasent remarks, " Amongst all the entries relating to Recusancy 
(in the Privy Council Acts) it is remarkable that we find only one which 
indicates a possible conversion," * surely a very wonderful testimony to 
the constancy of hundreds of Catholics. 

Sir Thomas remained a prisoner at Broughton about seven months, 
he was then sent back to London to endure the last and cruellest trial of 
his long martyrdom. But before recounting it, we must turn back for 
a while to Norbury. 

When Sir Thomas was first imprisoned by the Commissioners, his 
younger brother Richard (old Sir Anthony's third surviving son) escaped 
to the Continent. (He is called "the fugitive" in the Privy Council 
Acts.f) After a time, however, he returned, and lived for a while 
peaceably at Norbury. As we have seen, Sir Thomas, in 1583, conveyed 
to him his manors in trust. He is there called " of Hartsmere," which 
was an estate in Staffordshire belonging to Sir Thomas, which the 
Knight had let to him for a term of years. 

The spies reported the fugitive's return in 1590, and the Privy 
Council despatched a man named Thorne, a notorious pursuivant of the 
roughest character, to effect his capture. The story is given from a 
manuscript of Father Christopher Grene's now preserved at Oscott 
College.! "Thorne practising to apprehend Mr. Richard Fitzherbert 
used this policy. To Norbury, where he knew this gentleman lay, came 
three lame supposed beggars, one man, two women, among divers others 
that there had alms. And when all were served as accustomed, these 

* Acts, vol. xix. p. 24. f Vol. xviii. p. 140. 

\ Printed by Morris, Troubles of our Cathoiic Forefathers, third series, pp. 1 5-16. 

5 




THE DOOR OF THE GREAT HALL, 
NORBURY MANOR HOUSE 

Photo by James Watts To face page 50 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

three continued still crying and craving more alms, as seeming more 
needy. The good gentleman, going down himself at their pitiful cry, 
to give them some money, the man beggar arrested him, laying hands 
on him to carry him to an officer and threw the gentleman down. 
With this noise his friends within came out to rescue him. The beggar, 
seeing that, having a dagg [pistol] ready charged at his girdle, offered 
to discharge it at Mr. Fitzherbert's breast, but it went not off. There- 
upon the beggar, beaten, let fall his dagg and went a little way off, 
where Thorne expected his return with hope of prey. The dagg then 
taken up by one of that house, went off itself without hurting anybody, 
albeit there were many present." 

We find from the Privy Council papers that Thorne was no stranger 
to Richard Fitzherbert. He had already dispossessed him of the estates 
of Hartsmere and Bancroft, in spite of Sir Thomas' protests. He had 
carried off all his cattle, and was in fact a veritable pest to all the faithful 
in Staffordshire.* 

Now he wrote furiously to complain to the Privy Council of his ill- 
success in his attempt at Norbury. Their Lordships were much 
horrified. They wrote to Lord Shrewsbury ordering him to arrest 
Richard Fitzherbert, and detailing the injuries which Thorne pretended 
his agents had received in the attempt at Norbury. " By virtue of our 
warrant, the said Thorne, having by means of one Thomas Elkin and 
others apprehended the said Richard, he was never the less by divers 
like evil disposed persons inhabiting the said house and town of 
Norbury presently rescued, and with strong hand taken away . . . and 
in the same affair have grievously wounded and hurt Elkin and others, 
whereof they are at this present in great peril of life. Forasmuch as 
this notable outrage ought speedily to be redressed, and that your 
Lordship by reason of other your occasions and dispositions of body 
cannot so conveniently travel yourself, we have therefore thought it 
expedient to pray your Lordship to appoint your son, the Lord Talbot, 
calling to him the bearer hereof, Mr. Richard Topcliffe, purposely sent down 
to attend your Lordship about this matter, and such others as his Lord- 
ship shall think fit to make his present repair unto Norbury above said 
. . . and by virtue hereof to search all houses, apprehend and send up 
hither the principal and chief of the men so offending under safe custody, 
to be proceeded with here according to law." f 

It is pretty clear that the Council mistrusted Gilbert, Lord Talbot 
(we find among the State Papers denunciations of this nobleman, after he 
had succeeded to his father's title and jurisdiction, as a friend and 

* Morris, Troubles of our Catholic Forefathers, third series, p. 23. 
f Acts, vol. xix. p. 141. Letter dated May 20, i 590. 

51 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

harbourer of Papists), and so sent the redoubtable Topcliffe himself to 
see that nothing went wrong this time. It is moving to think of this 
inhuman monster at beautiful Norbury. Did he bring with him, we 
wonder, his wretched tool, Thomas Fitzherbert ? The miserable man 
was to take a part two years later, in arresting, at Topcliffe's command, 
the holy martyr, Father Robert Southwell, though even that villainy 
seems small beside his parricidal exploits.* 

This time, under such a leader, the expedition to Norbury was, of 
course, successful. The Council wrote to Shrewsbury on September 21, 
thanking him for his " great care and diligence in apprehending Fitz- 
herbert, Martin Audley,f Richard Twyford, and the rest " ; and begging 
him to authorise Thorne to arrest " Alice Royston, keeper of Sir Thomas 
Fitzherbert's house at Norbury, and also one Thomas Coxon, keeper of 
the said Sir Thomas his park at Ridwaye, and other such persons from 
time to time as the said Thorne shall give notice of to your Lordship." 

It seems that all this was done at the instigation of Topcliffe and his 
accomplice Thomas the traitor. The old document at Oscott, already 
quoted, says : " Mr. John Fitzherbert molested and troubled by his 
own son, imprisoned and there dead. This imp also, Thomas Fitz- 
herbert, hath sought by all means to take away the life of old Sir 
Thomas Fitzherbert, who made him his heir and brought him up from 
a child. He hath caused him to be suspected of statute treason, and to 
be committed to the Tower where he continueth. He hath procured 
also divers of his uncle's tenants to be imprisoned in Stafford, and there 
some of them are dead." J 

Poor Richard Fitzherbert fell ill in prison atter his arrest, but on 
August 6 the Council ordered him to be sent up to London " as soon 
as might be without endangering of his life in respect of his infirmity." 

* It is certain, at any rate, that Thorne knew Fitzherbert well. We find the follow- 
ing in an old manuscript : 

" Nicholas Thornes, the pursuivant, a most bad persecutor, lying on his deathbed, 
said : 'Now Queen Elizabeth cannot answer for me, nor Topcliffe, nor Thomas Fitz- 
herbert do me any good. He wished he might speak with a priest specially, whom he 
had sought much for, and that he should both come and go safely. In the end, he said 
he was condemned for persecuting the Church of God.' " From Fr. Grene's MS. " F," 
printed by Foley, Records, vol. iii. p. 227. 

"As to Father Southwell, Thomas Fitzherbert was not only with TopclifFe when he 
arrested the holy martyr at Mr. Bellamy's house at Harrow, but was the chosen messenger 
dispatched by Topcliffe to the Court to announce the good news and ' tell what good 
service he had done.' " Father H. Garnet's letter, Foley, vol. i. pp. 352-3. 

t Martin Audley was the faithful body-servant of Sir Thomas. He seems to have 
been a native of Hamstall Ridware, and to have had a son who was a priest. 

I In the margin is written : " Old Sir Thomas now dead in the Tower." 

Acts, xix. p. 368. 

5* 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

The same letter orders that John Fitzherbert be also sent up to 
London, since they understood that by his " ' lewd disposition ' he did 
great hurt in Derby gaol." Evidently his two years' imprisonment in that 
pestiferous place had not shaken his constancy or dimmed his zeal. 

The two brothers were accordingly sent up to London, where the 
prison doors closed on them, and we hear of them no more.* 

It was ordered by the Council f that Richard Fitzherbert and his 
friends should be " severely and strictly examined " by Topcliffe, a fearful 
ordeal in which torture had, no doubt, a predominant place. For Topcliffe 
was as one possessed with diabolical hatred of Catholics, and to recount 
his cruelties would, as Dr. Jessopp says, fill a volume. 

In October, 1590, the Council seem to have come to the conclusion 
that their Catholic prisoners were not likely, after all, to aid a foreign invader, 
should he come. They therefore graciously permitted that those confined 
at Broughton and Ely should be released on giving security and satisfying 
the Archbishop of Canterbury as to certain conditions to be observed after 
their liberation. 

Before this release could be obtained, however, the keeper's charges 
had to be met, for in those days one paid heavily for the privilege of 
being imprisoned. At Broughton, the keeper expected " over and above 
their ordinary charges of diet . . . some reasonable allowance towards the 
use and spoil of his linen and other his household stuff used and em- 
ployed in their service." Their Lordships politely hoped the prisoners 
would not refuse this, "being all persons of quality and behaviour," who 
could "well consider what appertaineth thereto." The situation certainly 
has its humorous side ! 

Sir Thomas Fitzherbert was sent up to the Archbishop with his fellow 
prisoners, but in his case special measures were taken. Topcliff and young 
Fitzherbert were determined that he should not escape them. The Arch- 
bishop was desired on October 28, "to make stay of him in his house 
until her Majesty's pleasure may be known," II and after this the good old 
knight was confined in the Lord Mayor's house for a time, during which 
the Attorney General was consulted as to his offence " and how far he 
might be charged therewith by law." 

The Council wrote f (November 30, 1590) to Mr. Rookeby, Master 

* The fact of Richard Fitzherbert's death in prison is not absolutely certain, but there 
can be little doubt that, like his brothers, he won the martyr's crown. 

t Acts, xix. p. 370. 

t At the Fleet, as at Wisbech, an entrance fee of fifty-three shillings and four fence was 
actually demanded ! If these fees were refused the keeper was authorised to seize the 
prisoner's goods. 

Acts, vol. xx. p. 18. Dated October 5, 1590. 

|| Ibid. p. 62. 11 Ibid. p. 100. 

53 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of St. Katherine's, and others that, " Whereas Sir Thomas Fitzherbert, 
Knight, stood charged with certain matters of great importance that 
concerned her Majesty and the State . . . because Mr. Topcliffe was 
acquainted with those causes, there were certain interrogations which he 
should exhibit unto him under the hand of Mr. Attorney General, where- 
upon her Majesty's pleasure was the said Sir Thomas Fitzherbert should 
be by him examined." 

They were therefore to repair to the house of the said Sir John Hart, 
Lord Mayor, and take the examination with " discretion and care " as well 
of Sir Thomas as of " such others as Mr. Topcliffe should give them 
notice of that were privy or able to disclose any of his dealings." It is 
to this date that we assign the Interrogatories drawn up by Topcliffe, which 
Dr. Cox has printed as an appendix to his " Norbury Manor House." * 

It was evidently desired to bring the old man to a traitor's death at 
Tyburn. Dr. Cox says that Sir Thomas was examined under torture. 
It is very probable that it was so, if not on this occasion, at least during 
the following months which he was to spend in the gloomy dungeons of 
the Tower. To inflict the extremity of torture on a Catholic was Top- 
cliffe's highest joy. His fiendish cruelty to the Venerable martyrs, 
Robert Southwell, Henry Walpole and Eustace White, are instances in 
point. 

In his exultation at seeing his prey at last within his grasp Topcliffe 
wrote to Lord Shrewsbury on December 8, as follows : " Neither will 
God suffer the practises of the wicked to be hidden, as lately hath burst 
out the lewd dispositions of that dangerous family the Fitzherberts in the 
country, in whose three houses hath been moulded and tempered the 
most dangerous and loathsome Treasons." f 

The Interrogatories contain the most absurd charges. They seek to 
involve the good old knight in the Rising of the North, so far back as 
1569, as well as in Babington's conspiracy of 1586.^ We see now the 
reason for the arrest of his housekeeper, the keeper of his park at Ham- 
stall Ridware, his bailiff and tenants. They, as well as Richard Fitzherbert 
himself, are to be cited as witnesses against him. In fact, the name of 
Richard Fitzherbert heads the list of witnesses "to prove these to be true." 
Among others are the very men who were arrested with Richard at Nor- 
bury Martin Audley, Richard Twyford, and the rest. There are about 

* J carnal, pp. 256-9. 

t Quoted from the Talbot MSS., Lodge, Illustrations oj British History, vol. ii. p. 4.02. 
Shrewsbury died December 18, 1590. 

t He was connected with the Babingtons by marriage, his aunt, Edith Fitzherbert, 
having married Thomas Babington, of Dethick, grandfather of Anthony the conspirator. 
Their arms, impaled, are still to be seen on the roodscreen in Ashover Church, where 
Thomas Babington has a beautiful tomb. 

54 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

twenty witnesses named, all of whom were relatives or tenants of Sir 
Thomas, and all prosecuted for recusancy. " It is not likely," as Dr. Cox 
remarks, " that much could have been got from them unless torture was 
applied." Even then, it would appear that the charges completely broke 
down, for Sir Thomas was never brought to trial. Not that many of 
these changes (i.e. those of harbouring priests and favouring religion) 
were untrue, but that it was found impossible to prove them. Nothing 
is said about Padley, so probably Mr. Attorney General pointed out that 
no charge could be substantiated against Sir Thomas on this head, 
since he could not have known of the presence of the priests there 
in July 1588. 

The first of these Interrogatories inquired whether he were not with 
Blessed Thomas Percy at his house at Topcliffe a month before the 
Rebellion in the North. If this is true, it is an interesting fact ; but 
there is no proof of it. We may quote here some of the questions which 
probably have a good deal of truth in their suggestions. 

" Item, whether he hath not for the space of these sixteen years and 
more, kept in his house at Norbury massing priests and now doth, to say 
service there daily. 

" Item, whether he doth not keep in his house at this instant four 
priests, viz. Sir Richard Arnold, Abraham Sutton, Robert Gray, and one 
Francis, besides daily Recusants and all sorts of Papists. 

" Item, whether he doth not relieve daily, and ever hath done, both 
Jesuits, seminaries, and massing priests, and now doth keep house only 
for the maintenance of such persons, and ever hath done. 

" Item, whether all his servants both men and women be not Recu- 
sants as also reconciled and vowed Papists so to continue. 

" Item, whether Father Persons the Jesuit did not preach and say 
mass at his house at Norbury, and whether that all his household people 
both men and women, did not receive at the same time with divers 
others . . . 

" Item, whether he hath had the Pope's pardons brought him at any 
time, and whether he and his household have received the Communion 
upon the same pardons, and how often and how long since." 

The name of Abraham Sutton brings us into connection with another 
martyr. He was the brother of Venerable Robert Sutton, who suffered at 
Stafford for his priesthood, July 27, 1588, and whose incorrupt thumb is 
kept as a relic at Stonyhurst. There were three brothers priests, natives of 
Burton-on-Trent. Abraham Sutton was for years tutor to the young 
Fitzherberts. 

The other priests are identified by Dr. Cox. Robert Gray was also 
tutor to the Fitzherberts ; he was imprisoned both in London and Derby, 

55 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

and was tortured by Topcliffe. Eventually he escaped to France.* 
John Francis was a friar, a native of Repton. Richard Arnold (alias 
Audley) was a young priest, son of one of the tenants at Hamstall 
Ridware. 

No doubt many other priests had found a shelter at Norbury and at 
Hamstall, during Sir Thomas' long imprisonment, and doubtless it was 
hoped that Alice Royston, the housekeeper at Norbury, would give 
valuable evidence on this head. But .these humble Catholics were as 
faithful as their master. 

On December 29, 1590, the Council ordered Mr. Attorney to 
confer with Mr. Topcliffe on the examinations and confessions of 
Sir Thomas Fitzherbert, "and of his brethren, servants, tenants and 
others," who had been examined, and after due deliberation on the 
results obtained, to certify their Lordships with speed his opinion as to 
the dangerous nature of Sir Thomas' offence, and how far he might be 
charged therewith by law.f 

The result of this report appears in a letter of January 10, 1590-1, 
"to the Lieutenant of the Tower in the nature of a warrant : " "These 
shall be to require you to receive into your safe custody the persons of 
Sir Thomas Fitzherbert, knight, and John Gage, to be kept close 
prisoners in such strict sort as no manner [of] person be suffered to 
have access unto either of them without special direction from us ; 
and touching the charges of the diet and otherwise of Sir Thomas 
Fitzherbert during his being with you, you shall take order with the 
said knight and John Gage for the defraying thereof themselves. And 
so requiring you to have due care in the performance hereof, we bid you 
farewell." 

And so the last act of the tragedy begins. We hear the heavy portals 
of Traitors' Gate clash behind the brave old knight, and then there is 
silence. He was now in his 74th year, and he had been thirty years in 
bonds for Christ. 

The unbroken solitude and complete isolation of a close prisoner in 
the Tower made it a very severe punishment even for young and healthy 
men. It is no wonder that the old knight's health broke down under the 
strain, and that he died in less than nine months. 

In June 1591, the Council was informed that from want of exercise 
and close confinement in his dungeon the old man had become diseased 
in his legs and would shortly lose the use of them altogether if some 
relief were not granted him. They therefore ordered the Lieutenant to 
permit his prisoner " to walk at some convenient time and place within 
the Tower in his company, or in the company of some trusty person 

* Foley, Records, S.J., vol. vi. p. 167. f Acts, vol. xx. p. 175. 

56 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

whom he should appoint, so that no manner of person had access to him 
or conferred with him by any means." * 

But the remedy came too late. Topcliffe and the traitor had achieved 
their end at last. On October 3, 1591, the old knight died in the Tower, 
and, at last released from the prison of the body, entered into the joy of 
his Lord. He must have died without any of the consolations of the reli- 
gion for which he had suffered so much, but even for this last sacrifice must 
have merited an eternal weight of glory. Euge serve bone et fidelis.\ 

Dr. Cox tells us that shortly before his death, Sir Thomas made a 
will by which he disinherited his nephew, the traitor, " but Topcliffe was 
on the look out, obtained access to his cell, found the will, carried it off 
to Archbishop Whitgift, and with his sanction it was destroyed." 

" In the oldest Act Book of the Probate Court of Lichfield is an 
entry for administering the goods of Sir Thomas Fitzherbert (treated as an 
intestate) taken out by his nephew Thomas as next of kin, under date 
October 10, 1591." J 

And so the iniquity was consummated for which Topcliffe tells us he 
had toiled and laboured with Thomas Fitzherbert for seven years. 



THE FATE OF THE ACCOMPLICES 

Now that the old lion was dead the jackals began to divide the spoil. 
Thomas Fitzherbert having had his uncle's will destroyed, claimed as 
heir-at-law, in virtue of the marriage settlement, executed April i, 1578. 

* Acts. vol. xxi. p. 187. 

( The Venerable Eustace White, one of Topcliffe's most illustrious victims, writing 
from his prison to Father Henry Garnet, S.J., November 23, 1591, sent his letter by the 
hands of one who had been Sir Thomas' faithful servant in the Tower, 

He writes : " This bearer, Mr. , late and last servant unto the good Sir Thomas 

Fitzherbert (for he attended on him . . . hii death in the Tower) can partly relate unto you 
mine estate from the mouth of his good ... in prison by me, my dearest friend in bonds. 
For he hath spared from himself to relieve me with victuals as he could through a little hole, 
and with other such necessaries as he could by that means do, whom truly I did never see 
in my life but through a hole. Nothing was too dear unto him that he could convey 
unto me, for whom as I am bound so will I daily pray while I live. 

"I have been close prisoner since the l8th day of September, where of forty-six days 
together I lay upon a little straw in my boots, my hands continually manacled in irons, 
for one month together never once taken off," &c. 

The words in italics were erased by the prudence of Father Garnet, but owing to the 
ink drying in different colours they can now be read, though part of the original is still 
illegible. 

J 'Journal, vii. p. 248. 

The Commissions to the escheators of Derbyshire and Staffordshire, issued on the 
death of Sir Thomas, are dated December I, 1591. This has led to the erroneous state- 

H 57 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The young man was a spendthrift and a profligate, and probably already 
heavily burdened with debt. He soon began to dissipate his inheritance 
and to raise mortgages on the property. 

On June 9, 1592, the Council ordered that certain parcels of plate 
belonging to the deceased should be handed over to Thomas Fitzherbert, 
Esquire, his administrator, under bond to pay within eight days the true 
value of the plate equally unto Sir Michael Blount, Lieutenant of the 
Tower, and to Richard Pickering, Keeper of the Gatehouse in West- 
minster, " for the charges of the diet and other duties grown due unto 
them during his (Sir Thomas') imprisonment severally with them." * 
This is the only mention we have found of the fact that Sir Thomas 
had been imprisoned in the Gatehouse where so many valiant confessors 
suffered the cruellest hardships. He was, no doubt, transferred from 
that prison to the Tower in January, 1591. 

Though Sir Thomas was dead, and his murderers now hoped to 
enjoy the spoils, they did not relax their cruel persecution of his relatives 
and friends. TopclifFe now felt that he had the whole family in his 
power, and not least the wretched traitor whom he had led to commit so 
many crimes against faith and family. 

This may be the best place to refer to the extraordinary pedigree ot 
the Fitzherbert family, now in the Public Record Office, which was 
drawn up by TopclifFe about this time. It is wrongly calendared under 
1594 but its true date is 1591, since Sir Thomas is referred to as "now 
in the Tower." f It is endorsed in Topcliffe's peculiar style " The 
petygree of y e Fitzherbertz from the Judges Father untill them that nowe 
Lyve and be dyvers beyond sea, trators and most of y e resedew y' bee 
in England daingeroos Persons." 

Sir Thomas is noted as the third son of the Judge, the two eldest 
dying young without issue. " Now in Tower " is written below his 

ment that this was the date of the old knight's death, e.g. in an Exemplification of Letters 
Patent, 14 Car I. 1639, preserved at Swynnerton. 

Some confusion has been caused as to both the place and date of Sir Thomas' death 
by a document preserved at Swynnerton (Norbury, No. 39), an Exemplification of Letters 
Patent of King James I. (26 June, 2 Jac. I. 1604) appointing Sir John Bentley, Knight, 
Francis Fitzherbert, of Tissington, and others to inquire as to the manors and lands of 
Nicholas Fitzherbert, who stood attainted of treason committed I January, 31 Elizabeth 
1589. It recites the Inquisition taken at Derby, June II, 1604, before Sir John Bentley 
and Lawrence Wright. The jury declared that John Fitzherbert died November 8, 1590, 
at Norbury, and that Sir Thomas died November 30, 1591, also at Norbury. Neither of 
these statements is correct, any more than their further declaration that Thomas (the traitor) 
and Nicholas himself were then living at Norbury. Altogether this document is a mystery. 

* Acts, vol. xxii. p. 519. 

t S. P. Dom. Ellz. ccxxxv. No. 88. Foley gave a facsimile in his second volume of 
Records of the English Province S.J. p. 198, and Cox has done the same, Journal, vol. vii. 
58 




ANTHONY FITZHERBERT'S QUIETUS FOR RECUSANCY, 1606 

From the original deed at Swynnerton. Photo by the author 



ijl/K 

'^ 
r 



' 
, 

, 

4 











TOPCLIFFE'S ENDORSEMENT OF THE 
FINE OF THE MANOR OF PADLEY 

'Photo by the author To face page 58 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

name. John has the note, " Next brother to S r . Tho. to whome and to 
whose sone S r . Tho. assured ye lande 5 tymes." Then comes, " Rich, 
fytzharbert y e 5 brother, a feugetive outlawed and now in prison for 
rec g pste." Then, " Wm. fytzharbert ye 6 sone dead and left sev" 
child" and is called Fitzherbert of Swynerton." 

This brother has hardly been mentioned in our record, since he was 
fortunate enough to die in the year of Elizabeth's accession. But he is 
important in the pedigree as the ancestor of the present family. The 
marriages of the three daughters are then noted. 

Of the sons of John Fitzherbert, Thomas has the note, " A good 
subject and is her Maj ts servant & thought to be disinherited by S r 
Tho. his said Uncle verye wrongfullye." 

Nicholas is " a canonist at Rome. Now in service with Card. Allen. 
a trator " ; Francis is noted "A frier, a trator " ; Geordge, "a fhezewt 
[Jesuit!] iff he like, a trator" ; Anthony "in ye Gaole at Darby for 
receiving of Sem Preasts." "A tratoroos fellowe now enlarge out of 
Darbye Gaole," is added below. 

Richard's two sons, William " a youthe brought upp with Abram 
Sutt" a seam ry Priest," and Anthony " a youthe bro 1 upp w h ye sam 
Sutt 5 ye seam y Priest " are labelled " daingeroos." William Fitzherbert 
of Swynnerton's three children are Thomas, " fled for treason & now 
with Stanley in Spaigne a trator " ; Anthony, " a skoller of ye Seaminary 
now in England danidgeroos," and Anne, " a doughter married by 
S r . Tho. to Walt. Hevenningham in Stafford verye badd and 
danidgeroos."* 

Any family might be proud of such a pedigree as this ! 

Though Thomas got possession of Norbury by fraud, Padley, for 
which he had sinned so foully, never became his. It fell for a time 
into Topcliffe's hands, but only for a time. He was turned out of it by 
Lord Shrewsbury, as we shall see. Thomas and his accomplice did not 
profit greatly by their villainy after all. Thomas' cruelty and oppression 
to his tenants soon brought him into trouble. 

The Council received complaints, July 28, 1592, that he had forcibly 
evicted a poor tenant of Hamstall Ridware, by name William Sutton, 
with his wife and seven children, out of their dwelling, pulling down the 
house, so that they had nowhere to shelter their heads. The Council 
thought this "to be a hard and extreme course" and directed the 
neighbouring magistrates to inquire into the facts. Again we find him 
in September, " presuming on a protection from her Majesty whereby he 
supposeth himself to be exempt from suit of law," forcibly carrying off, 

* After this the reader will probably be grateful to us for having modernised the 
spelling elsewhere. 

59 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

with the aid of threescore persons, certain lead and lead ore to a great 
value, belonging to one Richard Hurt of Nottingham, and wrongfully 
detaining it for his own profit. On November 1 9 it was ordered that he 
should be arrested at Norbury, and in December the matters were referred 
to arbitration.* The wretched Thomas, in fact, ended as we should have 
expected. He became almost as evil as his master, Topcliffe, than whom 
hell had no more accomplished servant, f 

The two scoundrels soon quarrelled over the spoil. In November, 
1 594 (as we have seen), Topcliffe sued his accomplice in the Court of 
Chancery in a bond for 3000. " For whereas Fitzherbert entered into 
bonds to give 3000 unto Topcliffe, if he 'would persecute his father and 
uncle to death, together with Mr. Eassett. Fitzherbert pleaded that the 
conditions were not fulfilled, because they died naturally^ and Bassett was 
in prosperity. Bassett gave witness what treacherous devices he had 
made to entrap him, and Coke, the Queen's Attorney, gave testimony 
openly that he very well had proved how effectually Topcliffe had sought 
to inform him against them contrary to all equity and conscience." J 

" This was rather too disgraceful a business to be discussed in open 
court, and ' the matter was put over for secret hearing,' when it would 
seem that Topcliffe, standing somewhat stiffly to his claim, lost his 
temper, and let fall some expressions which were supposed to reflect on 
the Lord Keeper and some members of the Privy Council, whereupon 
he was committed to the Marshalsea for contempt, and there kept for 
some months. While he was incarcerated, he addressed two letters to 
the Queen, which have been preserved, and two more detestable 
compositions it would be difficult to find. In one of them, dated 'Good 
or evil Friday, 1595,' he says, '. . . I have helpt more traitors [to 
Tyburn] than all the noblemen and gentlemen of the court, your 
counsellors excepted. And now by this disgrace I am in fair way and 
made apt to adventure my life every night to murderers, for since I was 
committed, wine in Westminster hath been given for joy of that news. 
In all prisons rejoicings, and it is like that the fresh dead bones of Father 
Southwell at Tyburn and Father Walpole at Tork, executed both since Shrove- 
tide will dance for joy ! ' " So far Dr. Jessopp. 

* Acts of Privy Council, vol. xxiii. pp. 72, 165, 314, 338. 

t The late Thompson Cooper, in the D.N.B., says Topcliffe had authority to torment 
priests in his own house, and that he boasted he had a machine there of his own invention, 
compared with which the common racks in use were mere child's play 

t Stonyhurst MSS. Angl. A.N. 83. 

He ^had actually seduced (if not worse) Anne Bellamy, the daughter of Father 
Southwell's host, whom he got into his power, having carried her off to prison on one of 
his raids. He then used her for playing upon her own father, and betraying the secrets 
of the house, so that he was enabled through her means to apprehend the holy martyr 
60 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

From these letters (which we have taken the trouble to copy at the 
Museum, and print in full in the appendix) it would appear that 
Topcliffe's chief offence was his indiscreet allusion to the 10,000 paid 
to Puckering, the Lord Keeper, (and apparently to other members of the 
Council) for the life of Mr. John Fitzherbert. It is little wonder that 
Topcliffe should have thought this piece of villainy hardly better than his 
own. But it was also very important to stop his mouth. So Puckering 
lost no time in committing the miscreant to prison. 

We also print in the Appendix the absurd and outrageous charges 
which Thomas Fitzherbert concocted against Mr. William Bassett. They 
are indeed very instructive. It is well to note that Thomas was now 
"Her Majesty's sworn servant," i.e.\ one of that miserable band of 
pursuivants who were the plague of all good Catholics, and a disgrace to 
the Government that employed them. 

Though his adversary had fallen into disgrace, it is a comfort to know 
that Thomas had not escaped scot-free. We find him, at this very time, 
a prisoner in the Fleet, and, as usual, making mischief. 

In the same volume of MSS. which contains the articles against 
Bassett, are the records of an enquiry * into the conduct of a " James 
Rither, Esquire, now prisoner in the Fleet," who was a cousin of 
TopclifFe's, and had been boasting of his relative's influence with the 
Queen, and encouraging his fellow prisoners to appeal to her Majesty 
over the heads of Judges and Privy Council, with the promise of 
TopclifFe's support. This was, of course, to be given for a consideration, 
and a certain Catholic lady in the prison, Mrs. Jane Shelley, had been 
induced by the precious pair to pay over to them more than 100 in 
gold, in the hope of gaining her liberty. When she grew restive, they 
resorted to threats. Mr. Patrick Sacheverell (one of the Derbyshire 
Catholics of that name) testified that he, "standing one day under the 
vine in the Fleet Garden, about a month past, saw them bring Mrs. 
Shelley into Mr. Rither's chamber, where Mr. TopclifFe did threaten 
her with- many evil words, saying he could procure her utter undoing, 
and Mr. Rither replied that her life lay in Mr. TopclifFe's hands, and 
that the said TopclifFe was the man that could do her good ; and Mr. 
TopclifFe charged her that she had deceived him, saying that she had 
divers goods, as jewels and other things in her chamber in New Holborn, 
which he could not find." 

Thomas Fitzherbert testified that Rither had abused the Lord Keeper, 

there and bring the whole family to ruin. He married the unhappy girl to one of his 
own low tools. The italics in the text are Dr. Jessopp's. Harleian MSS. 6998, No. 50, 
fol. 185. One Generation of a Norfolk House, pp. 70-72. 
* Harleian, 6998, fol. 190. 

61 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

and said that he had tasted already too much of his bitterness, that the 
new Orders of the Fleet were illegal, ungodly and intolerable, and that 
he would have his cousin Topcliffe move the Queen's Majesty of them, 
and put the new Warden out of his office. Also that he had got 
money, at least .100, out of Mrs. Shelley, under pretence to procure 
her liberty, and had persuaded her that the Lord Keeper and Mr. Beale 
were her enemies. Rither, of course, denied everything, and said he 
had been made quite ill by these cruel accusations. He now found to 
his cost that it was no longer an advantageous thing to be the cousin 
of Richard Topcliffe. 

We do not know how long Fitzherbert remained in the Fleet, but 
it was probably not long. Topcliffe and he were both valuable servants 
to the Government, and now that they had had a warning no doubt 
they would be more prudent in future. "Topcliffe was out of 
prison again and at his old tricks in October, the restless ferocity of the 
man never allowing his persecuting mania to cease for an hour. . . . 
What became of him at last it is not worth while to inquire, though it is 
the fate of such monsters of iniquity that their names can hardly go down 
to oblivion. Even enormous crime insures a measure, if not of fame, 
yet of infamy." * 

As to Thomas Fitzherbert, he went on selling all the property he 
could, and heavily mortgaging the rest. Topcliffe kept him out ot 
Padley, getting a grant of the manor from Queen Elizabeth, and even 
tried to get hold of Norbury, though in this he was unsuccessful. 

There are numerous deeds at Swynnerton showing how Thomas 
played ducks and drakes with his fortune. Fortunately he had a brother 
worthier than he, or Norbury itself would have been lost for ever to the 
Fitzherberts. Anthony, as we shall see, did all in his power to save the 
property for the family. 

By 1598 Thomas was a fugitive from justice. On April 14 the 
Council directed a warrant for his arrest. He took refuge in the Cold- 
harbour in Thames Street, which, it was claimed, was a privileged place 
where criminals were safe from arrest. 

He was charged not only with " force and violence offered unto one 
Maiden," but with owing " great sums to divers poor women and other 
her Majesty's subjects." The. Council, -on April 26, ordered the 
Attorney-General and Francis Bacon to inquire into the pretended 
privileges of the Coldharbour, and inform them what charter or authority 
there might be to warrant the liberty of that place.f 

On February 26, 1598-9, he was still at large, in spite of the writ 
of the King's Bench. 

* Jessopp, p. 72. | AM D f the Privy Council, vol. xxviii. pp. 410, 424. 

02 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

" Now forasmuch as the said Thomas Fitzherbert being of very evil 
name and fame . . . lurketh and lodgeth secretly in divers places in and 
near to the city of London, thinking that by the occasion of some privi- 
leged places to continue still in his said evil demeanour, whereby her 
Majesty's process cannot be served and executed . . . these are there- 
fore to will and require you [all her Majesty's public officers] in her 
Majesty's name, immediately upon sight hereof ... to enter into 
the said pretended places of privilege and other liberties, and to 
attach the body of the said Thomas Fitzherbert and to commit him to 

" * 

prison. 

This is the last mention that I find of the wretched man, save for the 
account given in his brother's petition, which follows. To understand 
it, it must be explained that the next brother, Nicholas, was heir after 
Thomas, but, as he had been attainted for treason, his estates were 
forfeit to the Crown. An inquisition as to his property was taken at 
Derby, June n, 1604. 

The petition from poor Anthony to Lord Salisbury, Lord High 
Treasurer of England, is in the Public Record Office.f It discloses new 
villainies on the part of his eldest brother : 

" Whereas Thomas Fitzherbert was seized ot the manor of Norbury 
in the county of Derby for term of his life, remainder to Nicholas 
Fitzherbert and the heirs male of his body (which Nicholas living beyond 
the seas was in the life-time of Queen Elizabeth attainted of treason), 
remainder to your petitioner and the heirs of his body, Thomas did in 
the 39th year of her Majesty's reign [Nov. 1596-7] acknowledge a 
recognisance of one thousand pounds to Mr. Robert Harcourt for the 
performance of covenant, and after sold the said manor of Norbury, 
being a small part of his lands, together with all other his lands to the 
value of 2000 by year to divers persons. 

" This petitioner, for that the said manor of Norbury had continued 
500 years in his name and blood, bestowed his whole fortunes to purchase 
the estate that Thomas had sold, and also paid for his Majesty's title 
which was escheated unto him by the attainder of the said Nicholas, 
1200. 

" Robert Harcourt neither being indebted to his Majesty nor upon 
any other consideration, by the instigation of the said Thomas Fitzherbert, 
about Christmas last assigned this recognisance to his Majesty, and 
procured only the land in the possession of this petitioner to be extended 
upon this recognisance at the value of 10 per annum. And now 

* Acts of the Privy Council, vol. xxix. p. 614. 

f S. P. Dom. James I. xlv. 63. I Husband of his sister Elizabeth. 

63 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

laboureth by some of his Majesty's servants to obtain lease thereof from 
his Majesty to hold for the rate of jio until ^1000 be satisfied. 

" Now my humble petition to your Lordship is, that forasmuch as 
this practice is intended to dispossess your petitioner of his whole estate 
of living, to his utter overthrow and undoing of his wife and children, 
That out of your honourable mind that never favoured practise, you 
will stay the granting of any such lease : And that your petitioner may 
be admitted to show to the Court what in law and equity he can for the 
discharging of his lands of the said debt. And so will daily pray to God 
for your Lordship's long life in all honour and happiness." 

Endorsed 

22 Maii, 1609. "Let this petitioner come to me on Tuesday next 
at 7 o'clock in the morning." 

Jo. ALTHAM. 

Taking these statements in conjunction with facts disclosed by the 
deeds at Swynnerton, we find that in 1597 Thomas Fitzherbert borrowed 
from his brother-in-law, Robert Harcourt, of Stanton Harcourt in 
Oxfordshire, the sum of 1000, for which he gave an annuity of 70, 
issuing out of his lands in Derbyshire and Staffordshire. He afterwards 
sold the lands. Anthony having bought Norbury, Robert Harcourt 
assigned his debt to the King about Christmas 1608, and then sought to 
enforce it against Anthony. Harcourt, who seems to have been a person 
after Thomas Fitzherbert s pattern, was afterwards outlawed " in divers 
personal actions at the suits of several persons." In 1619 arrears of 
^1226 135. ^d. were due upon the annuity, which the King had granted 
to friends of his own. 

Again, in 1595, Thomas borrowed 100 of a butcher named Areton 
for which possession of Norbury was granted till repaid. Anthony 
repaid it in 1610. Other portions of the property he bought for 280 
from Sir John Ferrers, of Tamworth Castle. 

Thomas Fitzherbert seems to have died between May 18, 1613, and 
May 23, 1615. At the former date he gave a general release of all 
claim to the manors of Norbury, &c., to Martha Fitzherbert, widow 
of Anthony, and at the latter date a deed at Swynnerton speaks of 
him as deceased. He is described as " of London," so he probably 
ended his miserable days in the great city. 

He had sold his faith and his honour, the lives of his father, kins- 
men, and benefactors, his happiness in this life, and perhaps in the next, 
for the miserable baits of the world and the glory of being called "a 
good servant of her Majesty " by Richard Topcliffe. And what had he 
gamed in this devil's bargain but misery, infamy, and eternal disgrace ? 
64 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

His accomplice, Topcliffe, also found his great friends turn from him 
at the last. He who had been flattered by Burleigh, and caressed by the 
great Queen, died in obscurity and universal contempt. Only for a time 
did he enjoy the fruits of his villainy at Padley. 

We give some extracts from a letter of his to Gilbert, Lord Shrews- 
bury, written in the last year of his evil career.* 

" Now give me leave (I beseech your Lordship) to be somewhat 
tedious in a cause that doth concern mine undoing, because I did receive 
no answer from your Lordship to my last letter sent you by Mr. 
Fenton, one who honoureth you, and seemeth to love me, for I was 
then loath, and still am so, that any person but a well wisher to us both 
should know that your Lordship . . . should now go about to offer 
to heave me (with your strength) out of Padley, a delightful solitary 
place, in which 1 took threefold the more pleasure for the nighness of it 
unto three of your chief usual houses, so there 1 thought that I should (in 
my old days) take comfort in your Lordship's presence. ... I trust 
that no practising enemy of mine shall interest your Lordship to offer 
to me that requital for my long loving you, either for their revenges 
against me or for their own gainings ; for such fugitive changes which 
brokers do not wish Padley to your Lordship tor duty or love, but for 
other devices. And if I had not known in my heart that there is a God, 
who will call mighty and mean unto an account, how they heap up land 
unto land, houses to houses, and also towns to towns, and often 
towns to one house, I could have had further foothold in Hathersage, 
Norbury, Ridwaye, and in all those stately manors and parks than any 
purchaser as yet hath. And with bitterness of soul some purchaser will 
buy his bargain dearly. For Padley, I did know it was no part of 
Fitzherbert's ancient inheritance, but given to Sir Thomas, and to him 
by Dame Anne Fitzherbert, and Thomas Fitzherbert did assure it to 
me and my heirs, I dearly paying for it and for the residue adjoining to 
it, partly with my purse, with adventures, with charges, and with above 
seven years toil and travail with him. 

" I therefore hope that your Lordship whom God hath blessed with so 
many thousand pounds of stately lands since I did first know you, and 
since your Lordship did first love me as entirely as you did any 
gentleman in England . . . will continue your good opinion of me 
and suffer me to enjoy with your favour Padley and the residue 
assured to me : To whom I can prove good Queen Elizabeth 
intreated your Lordship's favour and assistance under grant of her 

* Printed by Cox, 'Journal, vol. vii. p. 249, from the Talbot Papers at the College of 
Arms, M. 184. 

i 5 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Councillors' hands in the defence of my right unto Padley when you 
were first Earl." 

The hypocrite then goes on to make the most abominable charges 
against the unfortunate tenants at Padley, whom he accuses of all sorts 
of hateful crimes and vices. This letter is dated "from my solitary 
Sumerley y e 20 of February 1603," and signed, 

" Your Lordships auncyent honorrer 

" As y e Lorde Godd dothe know 

" Ric. TOPCLYFFE." * 

This appeal was not successful ; perhaps Lord Shrewsbury was 
already in treaty with Anthony Fitzherbert. We know he came into 
possession of Padley not very long afterwards. No doubt he had to 
pay a good price for his inheritance. TopclifFe died before December 3, 
1604, when a grant of administration was made in the Prerogative 
Court of Canterbury to his daughter Margaret. 

The family deeds at Swynnerton show that Padley remained in the 
possession of the Fitzherberts till 1657. 



FAITHFUL UNTO DEATH 

WE have finished with the sickening record of treachery and crime. It 
only remains to gather together a few brief notices of those who remained 
faithful unto death. 

We have seen that Nicholas Fitzherbert had been attainted of 
treason, ist January, ifSg.f This was on account of his zeal for the 
Catholic cause, and especially for his fervent co-operation with Cardinal 
Allen in his great work for the English colleges. Nicholas was born in 
1550, and was educated at Exeter College, Oxford. He stayed about 
four years at the University, being senior undergraduate of the College 
in 1572. He was not able to take his degree on account of his religion, 
and so, like many another at that time, he made his way abroad 

* The deed at Swynnerton already referred to (Norbury.No. 39) recites the Inquisition 
taken at Derby, June u, 1604, as to the manors and lands of which Nicholas Fitzherbert 
was seized January I, 1589, or since, which by reason of his attainder should accrue to the 
King. It is characteristic of the time that already in February 29, 1603-4, James I. had 
made a grant to Henry Butler, Francis Cartwright, George Gorse and their heirs of such 
remainder in the manors of Padley, etc. " as may accrue to the King by the attainder of 
Nicholas Fitzherbert." (S. P. Dom. "James I. vol. vi. No. 84.) 

f Dictionary National Biography, by Thompson Cooper, F.S.A. Fitzherbert's description 
of the University of Oxford in his time is exceedingly interesting. It has been reprinted in 
recent years. Oxoniensis in Anglia Academic Deicriftio, Romas. 1602, 8vo. Reprinted, 
Oxford Historical Society, vol. vii. Elizabethan Oxford. 

66 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

in order that he might freely profess his faith. He went to Allen's 
College at Douay, and after matriculating at that University, proceeded 
to Bologna, where he studied Civil Law. He afterwards settled in 
Rome, receiving from Pope Gregory XIII., as the note below shows, 
an allowance of ten golden scudi a month. 

When Dr. Allen was raised to the purple in 1587 Nicholas became 
his Secretary, and continued to reside with him till the Cardinal's death 
in 1594. He was extremely attached to his great master, and has left us 
a beautiful little sketch of his life.* 

His humility was so great that he never could be induced to take 
sacred orders, though his friends considered him worthy of a mitre. 
Dom Augustine Bradshaw, Prior of the English Benedictines at Douay, 
indeed recommended him as the most worthy person to be raised to the 
episcopate, when in 1607 proposals were made to send a bishop to 
England. He did not sympathise with the Spanish proclivities of so many 
of the exiles, and had some difficulties in consequence with the redoubt- 
able Father Robert Persons, SJ. But, on the other hand, he was a special 
friend of the Benedictines, and one of their most devoted supporters. 

At Allen's death a report was made to Philip II. as to the 
members of the Cardinal's household whom he had specially recommended 
to the King of Spain's generosity. The following is a translation of the 
note as to Nicholas Fitzherbert. 

" Nicolo Fierberti, copyist and servant from the beginning of the 
Cardinalate. A gentleman of very noble birth and fortune, whose 
relatives have suffered much for the Catholic faith. He is a cleric (i.e. 
tonsured), capable of receiving a pension as such, though he does not 
wear the clerical dress. He knows how to serve well, and has been 
seven years in the service of the Lord Cardinal, by whom he was greatly 
beloved in Rome, where he had lived many years before, and had ten 
gold scudi a month, to enable him to study, from Pope Gregory XIII., 
of blessed memory. His father died in imprisonment of 26 years for 
the faith, and his uncle also left this life in prison for the same cause, 
after having been incarcerated for 32 years continuously." 

Mr. Fitzherbert continued to reside in Rome after his great patron's 
death. He was drowned while travelling near Florence, November 6, 
1612, and was buried by his beloved Benedictines in the beautiful 
Church of the Badia, at Florence. He left all he had to the Procuratoi 
of the English Cassinese monks. Thus while three of the elder gene- 
ration had died in prison for the faith, Nicholas was the first to die in 
exile, stripped of all he possessed, for the same holy cause. 

* N. Fizerberti <te Alani Cardinalis vita libellus, Romae, 1608. Reprinted in Letters anil 
Memorials of Cardinal A 'lien, London, 1882 (No. I. pp. 3-20). 

6 7 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Nor did the remaining members of the family escape persecution. 
We have already seen how Anthony Fitzherbert, John's second son, had 
been arrested at the time of the first raid at Padley on Candlemas Day, 
15878, and carried off to Derby gaol. Dr. Cox prints a letter from 
the Talbot MSS. in which he promises to conform.* It is dated May2i, 
1591, when he had been three years and more in prison. As Dr. Cox 
says, " We must not judge him too harshly : Derby gaol seems to have 
been enough to unnerve any one." His father had died a few months 
before of gaol fever, no doubt contracted there, and he himself had been 
very ill of the same wasting disease. He implores to be released in a 
pitiful way, since he has been no " meddler in matters of state, but only 
misled in points of religion, wherein I have been houseled up from my 
infancy (never tasting any other pap)." Now he was ready to conform 
himself and come to the Church. " Pardon me my Honour : good 
Lord (1 humbly beseech you), my unfortunate boldness for the straitness 
of this place, and most odious for many causes, which the loathsome and 
unsavoury smells, and the cumbersome companions which be hither 
remitted for all vices, wherewith I am pestered, do so daily increase the 
many infirmities of my weak body . . . that unless I find your Honour 
to stand my good Lord, I shall rather wish a short and speedy death 
than so weary and consuming a life." 

This letter seems to have brought about his release, but he was again 
apprehended shortly afterwards, and for a time imprisoned in London. 
Evidently he returned to the Faith immediately after his release, and he 
proved faithful for the rest of his life. 

He had been convicted of recusancy July 4, 1589, and at Swynnerton 
s still preserved a Receipt and Quietus for 120, of which 60 was 
due for absence from Church for three months from December 20, 1587, 
and the other 60 for refusing to submit after his conviction till 
S ptember 22, 1589. These fines were not paid till the Easter Term, 
3 James I., 1606, the date of the Receipt. He is described in this 
document as " nuper de Padley," and the church he refused to attend is 
the parish church of Hathersage. 

We give, facing p. 58, a facsimile of this very interesting document. 
Anthony died in 1613, his will (of which the original Probate copy 
exists at Swynnerton) being dated December 24, 1612, and proved in 
London March 23, 1613. He gave the whole of his estate to his 
wife Martha (daughter of Thomas Austen, of Oxley, County Stafford), and 
appointed her sole executrix. He left one son and five daughters. The 
son, Sir John Fitzherbert, was a gallant cavalier, and colonel in King 
Charles I.'s army. There is a fine portrait of him at Swynnerton. 
* Journal, vol. vii. p. 254. (Talbot MSS. H. 289.) 

68 








THOMAS F1TZHERBERT, S.J. 
From his portrait at Swynnerton 
Photo by the author 



To face page ( 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

He died childless, and was succeeded, in 1649, by his cousin, William 
Fitzherbert, great-grandson and heir of William Fitzherbert, Sir Thomas' 
brother, who had married the heiress of the Swynnertons. 

From this date Swynnerton was the principal residence of the family, 
and (apparently in 1682) Norbury was reconstructed on a smaller scale, 
and used as a farm residence. A doorway in the Great Hall still bears 
this date. 

The husbands of three of the five sisters of Anthony Fitzherbert 
(Draycott, Barlow and Eyre) all suffered fines and imprisonment for 
recusancy. Maud Barlow was imprisoned in the plague-stricken gaol at 
Derby for more than three years, while her sister, Jane Eyre, and a third 
sister were placed in private custody. Their gaolers were William and 
Richard Sale, rectors of Aston and Weston-on-Trent, both staunch 
Protestants. However they could make nothing of these brave ladies. 
A letter of the Privy Council, August iyth, 1589, speaks of the 
" obstinacy and superstitious and erroneous opinion" of these last two 
ladies, and directs that as there was no hope of their conformity they 
might be placed with their kinsfolk, the charges of their gaolers being dis- 
bursed by selling some of the goods of Mr. John Fitzherbert, their father.* 

There is one more member of the Fitzherbert family whom we 
cannot altogether pass over, although it is impossible to devote to him 
the space which his merits deserve. 

This is Thomas Fitzherbert of Swynnerton, son and heir of William 
Fitzherbert, and therefore first cousin of Nicholas and Anthony. He 
had a very eventful career, and his life, if adequately treated, would 
require almost a volume. The State Papers are full of his name, and 
extensive biographies of him are found in the works of Jesuit writers, 
such as Father Henry More and Brother Foley. 

Thomas Fitzherbert was, in fact, a very remarkable man. He was 
born in 1552 at Swynnerton, and studied at Oxford, probably at Exeter 
College, with his cousin Nicholas. As early as 1572 he was imprisoned 
for recusancy. In 1580 he became one of the most active of that little 
band of heroic young men who, under the leadership of George Gilbert, 
devoted themselves to assisting Blessed Edmund Campion and Father 
Robert Persons, S.J., in their wonderful missionary work. 

The story of those adventurous days has often been told. In another 
part of this book we shall see how Fitzherbert helped Campion in one 
of his most important undertakings. In 1580 he married Dorothy, the 
only daughter and heiress of Edward East of Bledlowe, County Bucks, 
by whom he had one son, Edward. Two years later he was forced to 
retire to France, and the rest of his life was spent in exile. After his 

* Acts, Privy Council, vol. xviii. p. 45. 

6 9 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

wife's death in 1588 he went to Spain where he received a pension from 
Philip II. He was accused, without any reason, of plotting the 
Queen's assassination. Ordained priest at Rome, March 24, 1601-2, 
he for twelve years acted as agent to the English secular clergy ; 
in 1613 he joined the Society of Jesus, and from 1618 to 1639 was 
Rector of the English College at Rome. He died in the College, 
August 7, 1640. 

Anthony Wood's opinion of him is as follows : " He was a person 
of excellent parts, had a great command of his tongue and pen, was a 
noted politician, a singular lover of his countrymen, especially those who 
were Catholics, and of so graceful behaviour and generous spirit that 
great endeavours were used to have him created a Cardinal some years 
after Allen's death, and it might have been easily effected, had he not 
stood in his own way." 

He was a prolific writer of controversial books. His refutation of 
Macchiavelli entitled A Treatise concerning Policy and Religion, dedicated 
to his son Edward (Douay, 1606-10), was greatly esteemed both by 
Catholics and Protestants. But far more than all this, he was a man of 
great and fervent sanctity. Father Henry More speaks of the tears 
that would frequently well from his eyes as he explained a verse of 
Holy Scripture, or quoted some familiar English hymn. 

Some passages from his own account of his inner life written at the 
command of his General, when at the age of sixty-two he entered the 
Society, may be fitly quoted here. 

" I ever, by the Grace of God, venerated the Blessed Virgin with 
special devotion ; and so, when about twenty years of age, I made a 
vow daily to recite her Office, I also added other obligations, not 
only to fast on her vigils, but also to abstain from eggs, fish, milk of 
any kind ; also to recite daily one chaplet and on Saturdays two, also 
on her feasts to confess and communicate and to recite the whole 
Rosary, even during the Octave, finally to fast on all Fridays when I 
was at home. . . . 

"... But as I have also to answer regarding particular favours, I 
acknowledge that the divine bounty has bestowed divers upon me, 
though I am a most worthless and grievous sinner, meriting nothing less 
than hell itself. And first and foremost, that, although being born in 
the reign of the heretical King Edward VI., in the year 1552, when 
there was no public profession of the Catholic religion of England, both 
my parents were by the singular providence and mercy of God, Catholic, 
and that I was baptized with all the ceremonies of Holy Church, and 
vyas educated a Catholic. And I remember when I was a boy of five or 
six years of age, I possessed the light and gift of faith, being accustomed 
70 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

to stand and contemplate the heavens and to meditate upon God, espe- 
cially upon His eternity, and that it had existed without a beginning ; 
and I strove much to comprehend how this could possibly be ; and 
although I could not understand it, nevertheless I believed it with much 
amazement. 

"God, moreover, planted within me other seeds of virtue, in my 
infancy itself, although from want of discretion, and the many evils of 
my nature, they did not bring forth due fruit. For when I had attained 
nine or ten years of age, I was seized with a great desire of almsgiving, 
which as I could not satisfy otherwise, I would secretly abstract food 
from the stock of the house, and hiding it, would afterwards distribute 
it among the poor. I fasted also sometimes indiscreetly, not having any 
spiritual father to guide me ; for instance, not being above twelve years 
old, I would fast the last three days of Lent upon bread alone and a 
little fruit. And when I came to understand many things about the 
Fathers of the Society and their Institute, I was strongly affected towards 
them, and towards all who were attached to them. And in that early 
age I conceived a great desire of martyrdom, and often prayed God to 
bestow that favour upon me. With increasing years the light of faith 
also increased, and by the gift of the good God a zeal towards the 
Catholic faith, and a hatred of heresy ; nor would I willingly converse 
with Protestants, or attend their sermons. Upon which point I cannot 
omit a benefit accorded me by God, for when sixteen years old I was a 
student in the University of Oxford, a temptation came over me, out of 
curiosity, to hear a heretical sermon. Nevertheless, 1 would not do so 
without the advice and consent of my confessor, an aged and not a very 
learned priest, who on account of the persecution lay concealed in Oxford. 
I asked his opinion, which was that I could be present without sin, 
provided I did not go to learn, but merely to hear. Indeed, in those 
times but very few Catholics abstained from attending Protestant 
sermons, although they would not be present at the prayers. Therefore 
having heard the opinion of my confessor, I sallied forth on a certain 
day to hear a special famous preacher, who had already ascended the 
pulpit before I arrived ; but no sooner had I put my foot in the church, 
than I was seized with so violent a horror that I could not possibly 
remain there ; I therefore rushed out, the only word I heard being the 
name of Jesus Christ. And from that time I openly professed myself 
before all to be a Catholic, and took every opportunity of defending the 
Catholic religion against the ministers and other heretics, and of confirm- 
ing the Catholics in their faith. On this account I was forced to be hid 
for two years, and being at last seized, I bore an imprisonment to my 
great consolation. On the arrival of Fathers Campion and Persons in 

7 1 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

England [1580], I associated with them, and rendered them what assist- 
ance I could, until the heat of the persecution became too strong for 
me. I determined to emigrate and live in exile as long as heresy was 
dominant. 

" 1 acknowledge also the high favour and goodness of God which 
never suffered me, as far as I can recollect, to remain for twenty-four 
hours in any sin, although when a youth, I very frequently offended 
Him grievously, ungrateful and unworthy of such mercy ! 

"The Divine Majesty likewise, even from my childhood, excited 
within me vehement feelings and spiritual affections, with great emotions 
in my soul. For when my mother suggested to me, being then a boy of 
ten years of age, to prepare to receive the most Holy Communion, as I 
was going into the fields, and reflecting upon the greatness of the 
mystery, and begging of God to make me worthy of so great a benefit, 
such a feeling of consolation suddenly seized my soul, that I burst into 
a flood of tears, which affection lasted until I had, as I hope with great 
profit, confessed and communicated ; and from that time even until the 
present, many similar visitations have occurred to me in England, France, 
and Spain, especially after my making the vow of chastity. And 
(to omit other cases) when in Spain, for several days the representa- 
tion of our Lord Christ crucified remained so indelibly imprinted 
upon my memory, that, except when actually asleep, it was always 
present to me ; which favour 1 lost by my own fault, since, ungrateful 
as I was, I did not esteem it as it deserved, nor did I endeavour to 
preserve it. 

"At another time, whilst I read the Life of St. Benedict, written by 
St. Gregory, I was melted into tears, and experienced during the greater 
part of the night great consolation and sweetness of soul, lasting until 
overcome by sleep. But after my admission to the Society I enjoyed 
these kinds of visitation much more copiously ; and I appeared to myself 
to be sometimes totally inflamed with divine love ; and one night being 
unable to sleep, whilst praying in bed, it seemed to me as though a 
stream, or rather I should say, a certain torrent rushed into my heart, 
filling me with inexpressible sweetness, giving me an assurance of the 
presence of God in my soul, whereupon I began to praise God with 
great jubilee and copious tears, frequently repeating, Bene venerit Dominus 
meus, bene venerit Dominus meus ' Welcome my Lord, welcome my 
Lord,' and returning thanks for so sweet a visitation. 

" Also, another time, when on the night of the Nativity of our Lord, 
[ was singing Mass in the English College, and was administering the 
most Holy Eucharist to the scholars, I was overtaken by so great a 
consolation and flood of tears, as to be unable to proceed in giving 




THE CHRIST OF SWYNNERTON 

Photo by the author To face fag,- 72 



THE TRAGEDY OF THE FITZHERBERTS 

Communion, or to finish the singing part of the Mass, although 1 made 
many and great efforts to do so. This happening in public caused me 
so great a confusion and distress, that I begged of God to be pleased to 
remove from me this vehemence of devotion ; nevertheless, it was 
quite impossible for me to sing, and it was with difficulty that I 
read the remaining portion of the Mass in secret, my utterance being 
choked by tears and sighs. This holy consolation and joy lasted for 
two or three days. From which may be gathered how great was the 
kindness and mercy of God towards me, a wretched and ungrateful 
sinner. 

"Lastly, God was pleased to confer the greatest favour upon me, in 
placing me under the protection of His most holy Mother during the 
whole course of my life, and especially on her feasts, which I experienced 
in many and great necessities, both spiritual and temporal, and especially 
in observance of the vow of chastity which I had pledged in her honour. 
Also in a case of grievous calumny and false witness borne against me 
in Belgium, in which my life was in peril ; and likewise in many dangers 
both by sea and land in which I experienced the manifest help of the 
most holy Mother of God, so that I might justly repeat what my blessed 
Father Ignatius was accustomed to say of himself with the most profound 
humility that it was impossible to find these two things combined at 
once in any other individual, viz., to have received from God such great 
and excellent favours, and nevertheless to have been so ungrateful 
towards His Divine Majesty." 

With this self-revelation of a beautiful soul, this chronicle may fitly 
end. For here, at least, we get into close touch with the spirit that 
inspired these Fitzherberts to face suffering and death so gladly for their 
Master's sake. " Ung je serviray " was their device, and they never 
forgot it. To One their hearts were given, to One their loyal service 
was pledged, to One they were faithful even unto death.* 

It is thus not without significance that the principal relic of our 
Catholic past, which has been preserved by the family, is the great statue 
of Our Blessed Lord, pointing to the wound in His Sacred Heart, which 
is now to be seen in the Fitzherbert Chapel of the old parish church at 
Swynnerton. We give an illustration which, though it does not do it 
justice, gives some idea of the singular dignity and beauty of the original. 
Tradition says that it was formerly the central figure on the west front of 
Lichfield Cathedral, and was saved from desecration by the piety of the 

* For Father Thomas Fitzherbert see H. More, Historia provincia- Anglican* S.J. 
(St. Omers, 1660), p. 233, &c. ; Foley, Records S.J. vol. ii. p. 188 (Life), also vol. vii. 
(Collectanea), p. 258 ; Gillow, Bibliographical Dictionary ; Dictionary of National Biography ; 
tie Backer, Bibliothejue des Ecrivains S.J. and the Calendars of State Papers passim. 

K 73 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Fitzherberts, at the Reformation. It was buried in their chapel for safety, 
and dug up again in more peaceful times. A drawing of the statue in the 
Family Book shows it intact, with the right hand raised in blessing. It 
probably is meant to portray Our Lord in judgment, and if so, the central 
scheme of statuary on the west front of Lichfield will have been, like that 
at Wells Cathedral, a representation of the Doom. However this may 
be, it is touching to find that the Fitzherberts preserved this noble figure 
of the Lord whom they so faithfully served, and to whom alone they 
looked for the reward of their fidelity. 



74 




THE RUINED TOWER, WARBLINGTON CASTLE 




THE PRIORY CHURCH, CHRISTCHURCH, HANTS 

Photo by J. Miller 



To face page 75 



A RUINED CASTLE BY THE SEA 

IT was the writer's lot, in the year 1905, after enduring the ordeal 
of a severe surgical operation, to spend the days of convalescence 
amid the sea-breezes of Hayling Island. This little island, now 
known to fame chiefly by its golf-links, is closely attached to the 
coast of Hampshire, where that county borders on Sussex. It is four 
miles long, and contains some ten square miles. It is connected with 
the mainland by a swing bridge, erected in 1824, and by a railway 
bridge, and boasts of two interesting old churches, and the ruins of 
a Priory, which was a dependency of the famous Norman Abbey of 
Jumieges. 

At first it was sufficient happiness just to lie upon the sands and 
listen to the countless sky-larks which filled the air almost continuously 
with their thrilling notes of joyous melody. And when the sun's rays 
shone down too hotly on the beach, one could always seek refuge in the 
garden under the cool, dark shade of the ilex trees, which spread their 
sombre branches almost to the edge of the shore. 

But as bodily strength returned, the archaeological instincts of the 
pilgrim revived also, and in the cool of the day many an interesting 
expedition was made to the relics of Christian antiquity, which abound 
in the neighbourhood. And thus after due homage had been paid to 
St. Richard of Chichester and his Cathedral shrine, and the pilgrim had 
stood in the Saxon Church of Bosham, where Harold knelt before the 
coming of the Conqueror, and gazed upon the stone that covered the 
grave of the little daughter of Canute, there came a day when he 
went to seek one of those Forgotten Shrines which are dearest to his 
heart, and to muse among the ruins of the once stately castle, where a 
royal martyr lived, a castle that was for some two centuries an outpost 
of the persecuted faith. 

Crossing the bridge on to the mainland one bright June day, a walk 
along the water-side, under great trees of chestnut and beech, brought us 
in half an hour to Warblington. Unfortunately the tide was low at the 
time, and the prospect seawards was marred by long stretches of mud- 
flats, whose odour was even less pleasant than their aspect. But when 
the tide is in, the view must be fair enough, with Thorney Island in the 
foreground, and out far beyond the long, low promontory of Selsea 
Bill, which recalls so vividly the memory of St. Wilfrid, the great apostle 
of Sussex. Before us, on the very edge of the creek, the spire of Bosham 
gleamed, while further inland the taller spire of Chichester rose stately in 
the blue distance ; for Warblington lies on the border-line between 
Hampshire and Sussex. 

75 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

We turn inland across a field or two, shadowed by gigantic elms, and 
soon find ourselves at the little church, which stood here when the great 
Norman compiled Domesday Book, and which in the days of his 
Plantagenet descendants was re-dedicated in memory of " the holy 
blissful martyr," St. Thomas of Canterbury. A most charming little 
church it is, indeed, a whole epitome of English history. Its central tower 
has three stages, the lowest Saxon, the next Norman, and the third Early 
English of the thirteenth century. In this last period the church was 
rebuilt, and within we still find the south arcade with delicate clustered 
shafts of Purbeck marble, which was built in the days of the third Henry. 
In the reign of his warlike son, Edward Longshanks, other additions 
were made, and of the fourteenth century are also the two recumbent 
effigies of noble ladies that lie in the nave. 

On the north side of the chancel is what is probably an anchorage, 
where once an anchoret lived enclosed : a little low building, which has a 
low window or squint opening on to the High Altar, so that the solitary 
could ever see from his cell the Blessed Sacrament hanging in its veiled 
pyx above the altar, and at the sacring of the Mass could, in the beautiful 
old words of our forefathers, "see and adore his Maker." How vividly 
these little out-of-the-way country churches bring back to us the days of 
long ago ! And yet how difficult it is fully to realise a time when 
English men and women were found all over the country ready to devote 
themselves to a life of such absolute self-abnegation, such a de'ath in life, 
as that of the anchoret walled up in his narrow cell. Well might the 
Bishop read the funeral service, as he blessed the aspirant to so extra- 
ordinary a life, and enclosed him in the tiny chamber which he was 
never more to leave. 

But the peculiar glory of this church is not within. It consists in 
the extraordinarily fine north porch with timber front of fourteenth- 
century date. The massive oaken timbers could hardly be matched 
nowadays ; such trees are rarely found in England in our degenerate 
time. The porch was an important part of the church in mediaeval 
days. Here the first portions of the Sacraments of Baptism and Matri- 
mony were celebrated, and here women knelt to be churched. 

The churchyard is shadowed by grand old yew trees, one of which 
has a circumference of 26 feet, and must be of extraordinary age. 
Another feature of this pretty churchyard was new to us. At either 
gate we found a small low building, the use of which was very hard to 
understand. We were told that they were built for watchers at the time 
when hired miscreants, called " Resurrectionists," used to come at night 
and violate the new-made graves in order to carry off the corpses and 
sell them to the surgeons for purposes of dissection. It seemed strange 
76 




^ 5 

^H '<. 

'< '^ 
O 

z 

^ 

v_/ 

b 



> ^ 

w ". 
i- * ^ 

<GU' 
O 4T' 

PT^ C> 

K J 




U 

p< 
D 

a 
o 



z 



< 



W 
EC 



A RUINED CASTLE BY THE SEA 

that this hideous trade should have been so prevalent in this secluded 
spot, that it was necessary to have nightly watchers to secure the sanctity 
of God's acre, but its vicinity to the sea may be the explanation, for it 
would be easy thus to carry off bodies to sell at Portsmouth. 

As we stood in the porch of this little sanctuary of St. Thomas the 
Martyr, we looked across the churchyard northward to where a lofty 
ruined tower raised its battlemented crest amid the trees. 

This indeed, rather than the church, was the sanctuary we had come 
to seek, for this, and one great gateway close by, is, alas ! all that remains 
of the once famous Castle of Warblington. And \Varblington Castle 
must be ever dear to the Catholic pilgrim for the sake of the great lady 
who made it her home, and was torn from its peaceful shelter to witness 
for Christ in prison and on the scaffold. For Warblington was the 
favourite home of Blessed Margaret Pole, then the last surviving 
member of the royal house of Plantagenet, the direct descendant of 
Edward III. and niece of Edward IV. 

This is what makes the beautiful porch and the little church so 
profoundly interesting, for though the castle had its own chapel, doubtless 
on Sundays and feast days Blessed Margaret would be careful to assist 
at the Parish Mass, and here at Easter-time she would come to kneel 
beside the poor and humble at the Table of the Lord, and be fortified 
with the Bread of the Strong. 

A modern house, built by a worthy alderman of Portsmouth, occupies 
part of the site of the martyr's castle, and still contains traces of the older 
building, and we were kindly given permission to inspect and photograph 
the ruins. The illustrations will give a better idea of them than any word- 
painting of mine could do. It is still possible, though somewhat risky, 
to mount to the summit of the ruined tower, the base of which is used as 
a stable, and which is the haunt of innumerable pigeons. It now stands 
a solitary beacon to proclaim the glories of the past. This tower is one 
of the four which formerly stood at the angles of the castle. The building, 
which dates from the end of the fifteenth century, was in good order 
until 1633, but was dismantled in the time of the Commonwealth. 

Part of the moat still remains, but the great gateway is shorn of 
drawbridge and portcullis. An ancient local history thus describes the 
old castle : 

" The walls are stone and of great thickness, but those of the tower 
and gateway are faced only with stone, the inside being of brick. A deep 
moat and corresponding fosse surround the ancient site on three sides, 
but on the fourth the earth has been levelled. Ivy clings to the mantles 
and shattered turret, and the arches of the porch are festooned with it. 
The foliage of the elm and of the ash is to be seen through the ruined 

77 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

casements, and though desolation has completed her work, yet the hand 
of nature has been busy to compensate for the wanton destruction 
apparent at every step. 

" The building originally formed a quadrangle, surrounded on every 
side by a moat 30 feet wide and 10 feet deep, fronting the west, with an 
entrance under an arched gateway flanked by turrets, a porter's lodge 
to the south, and an armoury to the north. 

" The southern side of the quadrangle comprised the chapel, 42 feet 
by 32 feet, and the great hall, 58 feet by 32 feet, communicating at one 
end with a small cellar, and at the other with the buttery, kitchen and 
brewery. The state apartments occupied the northern side, with a fair 
gallery and sleeping-rooms above. The interior was of brick, faced with 
stone, brought from the Isle of Wight, or from Caen in Normandy. A 
very particular description of the building, when perfect, is to be found in a 
survey of the Manor of Warblington taken in the eighth year of Charles I. 
(1632), by William Luffe, general surveyor to the right worshipful 
Richard Cotton, Esq., the lord of the manor, and by his command." 

From this we learn that the court was 200 feet in length and in 
breadth, and that the four towers were covered with lead. " There is a 
fair green court before the gate, containing two acres of land, and near 
to the said place, a grove of trees containing two acres of land, two 
orchards, and two little meadow-plots containing eight acres, and a fair 
fish-pond near the said place," and so on. 

The Blessed Margaret Pole was, it will be remembered, the daughter 
of George, Duke of Clarence, who was murdered by his brother, 
Edward IV., having been, according to popular report, drowned in a 
butt of his favourite wine. The son of " murdered Clarence," her only 
brother, Edward, Earl of Warwick, the true heir to the throne, was legally 
done to death on this account by the jealous Henry VII. Queen Catharine 
of Aragon used to believe that the sorrows which afflicted her in later 
years were a judgment of God, for, as she said, her marriage had been 
" made in blood," the blood of this innocent, whose only crime was his 
right to the throne. She believed that her father, King Ferdinand, had 
refused to give her in marriage to the Prince of Wales as long as a male 
heir of the house of York was living. Queen Catharine lavished her 
affection on the victim's sister, for looking upon herself as the innocent 
cause of the Earl of Warwick's death, she was anxious to make her every 
reparation in her power. She made her godmother and "Lady Governess " 
to her infant daughter, Princess Mary. In 1513 the Lady Margaret was 
permitted to succeed to her brother's vast estates, and was granted the 
title of Countess of Salisbury. Her property chiefly lay in Hampshire, 
Wiltshire, and Essex, and she seems to have preferred the first of these 
78 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

counties. It was at Christ Church Priory that she prepared the magnificent 
chantry in which she wished to be buried, and at Warblington, at the 
opposite extremity of the county, she made the home of her old age, 
when the fickle cruelty of Henry VIII. had driven her, like her royal 
mistress, from the Court, and his wicked persecution of her family had 
accumulated sorrow upon sorrow on her grey head. 

She was the bravest and most constant of women, as her most bitter 
enemies freely admitted, truly a mulier forth. When the time came that 
every one in England was obliged to take a side, Margaret of Salisbury 
clung to the hapless Catharine's cause, and took the place of the poor 
mother as guardian of her daughter, Princess Mary. But even this was 
not long permitted. In February, i $34, the royal commissioners descended 
upon the Princess's peaceful retreat, at New Hall in Essex, and tore her 
from the arms of her venerable relative. This was a blow more bitter 
than the mere deprivation of rank or titles, for thus the Princess lost for 
the second time a mother's care. It was as great a sorrow to the Countess. 
The Spanish Ambassador wrote to the Emperor that the Lady Governess, 
" a lady of virtue and honour, if there be one in England, has offered to 
follow and serve her at her own expense. But it was out of the question 
that this would be accepted, for in that case they would have had no power 
over the Princess." 

The whirligig of time brings strange revenges. New Hall, which 
witnessed this sad and final parting, is now a convent, the English home 
of the Canonesses of the Holy Sepulchre. The ancient presence-chamber 
is now the conventual chapel, and the altar occupies the place where once 
was the royal dais. On the wall opposite the entrance may be seen a 
splendid achievement of the arms of King Henry VIII., carved in stone 
and richly coloured, which is said originally to have adorned the great 
gateway tower. Under the arms runs the inscription : 

" Henricus rex octavus, rex inclitus armis 
Miignanimus struxit hoc opus egregium." 

And outside, above the entrance to the chapel, is another coat-of-arms 
that of Mary's triumphant rival, Queen Elizabeth, with a fulsome Italian 
description calling her the most shining star in heaven and on earth, 
the most beauteous, the most learned, and the most virtuous of Virgins 
and of Queens ! But with a most happy instinct, the good nuns have 
placed just above this a large statue of our Blessed Lady, so that the 
words now seem to refer rather to the Queen of Heaven than to the 
apostate daughter of Henry VIII. Thanks to the kindness of the good 
Canonesses of the Holy Sepulchre, who now preserve with loving care 
the once royal mansion, I am able to give some views of the convent- 
80 





a 
fe 

o 



w 



A RUINED CASTLE BY THE SEA 

palace, where once Princess Mary and her faithful guardian spent days of 
comparative peace and happiness, before the tragedy of their separation. 

New Hall was either rebuilt, or at least extensively repaired, by 
Thomas, Earl of Ormond, to whom the Manor had been granted by 
King Henry VII. He was the great-grandfather of Queen Anne Boleyn, 
whose headless ghost is said to haunt the avenue. But long before that 
unhappy woman came to her end, after dragging to a violent death some 
of England's noblest sons, the most illustrious of her victims must often 
have wandered through these lime-tree alleys, when, as a young light- 
hearted lover, he came to court a bride at New Hall. 

For here lived one Mr. John Colt, an Essex gentleman, with his 
three daughters, and among his most frequent visitors was young Thomas 
More, of Lincoln's Inn. Here, in 1 505, the future Chancellor of England 
wooed and won his host's eldest daughter Joan, and thus the stately old 
Tudor mansion has its memories of more than one of Christ's Blessed 
martyrs.* 

We give reproductions of two old prints by G. Virtue, published in 
1786, showing the house as it was in Tudor days. 

Henry VIII. purchased it in 1517, and was so charmed with it that 
he gave it the name of Beaulieu, which, however, it did not long retain. 
He greatly enlarged and improved the house, and here he spent the feast 
of St. George in 1524. The noble gate-house which he built, and the 
buildings on either side, as well as the Chapel and Great Hall, have long 
since disappeared. In fact, what remains is, as at Audley End, but the 
south side of the great quadrangle. 

In the Chapel (on the left side of the engraving) was a large east- 
window, containing the beautiful painted glass now so much admired in 
St. Margaret's, Westminster. It is said to have been intended as a 
present to Henry VII. for his Chapel at Westminster from the magistrates 
of Dort in Holland, but it was set up at Waltham Abbey, and at the 
dissolution was removed to New Hall. 

It was here that, after the dispersal of her household, the unhappy 
Princess Mary still continued to live, save for a time when at the height 
of Anne Boleyn's power she was actually sent to Hunsdon to act as 
attendant on the favourite's infant daughter, Elizabeth. After Anne's 
execution, she regained possession of New Hall, and lived there quietly 
until 1553, the year of her accession to the throne. She had much to 
suffer during the reign of her young brother, Edward VI., because of 
her refusal to give up having Mass celebrated publicly in her chapel. 
Here, too, we know she had the Blessed Sacrament reserved all through 
the worst days of Protestant ascendency. 

* Morant, Essex i. 490. 
L 8l 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The illustrations show the entrance to the present chapel, and 
Elizabeth's arms with the inscription : 

" En terra piu savia Regina. En Ciclo la piu lucente Stella. 
Vcrgine Magnanima, Dotta, Divina, Leggialra, Honesta e Bella" 

And in the general view of the facade, we see the same doorway, with the 
statue of Our Lady above the coat of arms. The trophy of armour round 
the escutcheon of Henry VIII. is of later and much inferior workman- 
ship to the shield itself. A curious stone dragon, now in the park, 
formerly stood on the gates erected by Henry VIII. It represents the 
red dragon of the Princes of Wales. 

But we must leave New Hall with its once magnificent avenues of 
lime trees, and follow our royal martyr to her retirement at Warblington. 
Blow after blow fell upon her, for she had earned the resentment of the 
most cruel and relentless of tyrants. Her fidelity to the Queen and the 
Princess was not her only offence ; she was also the mother of Reginald 
Cardinal Pole, who in his book, De imitate ecclesiae, had dared to denounce 
the King's iniquities in vigorous terms, and had added to his crimes by 
persisting in remaining safely abroad, and by politely but firmly refusing 
to return and put himself into the power of the infuriated monarch. 
Attempts were made to procure his assassination in Italy, but when these 
also failed, vengeance fell heavy on the innocent heads of the Cardinal's 
family. Cromwell openly avowed this : " These that have little offended 
(saving that he is of their kin), should feel what it is to have such a traitor 
for their kinsman." Lord Montague, the Cardinal's brother, was arrested 
and executed for having sought absolution from the Holy See for having 
taken the oath of supremacy. The King told the French Ambassador 
that he intended to exterminate the whole family. Sir Edmund Nevill, 
Lady Montague's brother, the Marquis of Exeter, grandson of Edward IV. 
and Sir Nicholas Carew, were all barbarously executed. The King did 
not even spare little children. Edward Courtenay, the little son of 
Lord Exeter, and Henry Pole, the child of Lord Montague, were thrown 
into the Tower by this " Western Turk." The pathetic inscriptions 
carved by these children on the walls of their dungeon may still be 
seen. 

We can imagine the grief inflicted on the Lady of Warblington by 
the murder of her son and her other relatives. But this was not enough 
to satisfy Henry's vengeance. It might have seemed impossible to 
touch the Countess herself. She was venerable for her age, she was a royal 
princess, she was revered for her virtues ; in earlier days the King 
himself had honoured her and had been wont to say " that the kingdom 
did not contain a nobler woman." But her destruction was now decreed, 
82 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

or to put it better, she was now to earn the crown and palm of martyrdom. 
The King commissioned Fitzwilliam, Earl of Southampton, and Good- 
rich, Bishop of Ely, to arrest her at Warblington. They arrived there on 
November 12, 1538, ten days after the apprehension of her sons. We 
can imagine the confusion into which the castle was thrown by this 
sudden and ominous arrival. 

But the King's agents could neither frighten nor entrap the brave lady 
of the castle into any admission of guilt : though as they reported to 
Cromwell next day they had " travailed with her all day, both before and 
after noon, till almost night." " Surely," they protested, " we suppose 
that there hath not been seen or heard of a woman so earnest, so man- 
like in continuance, and so precise as well in gesture as in words, that 
wonder is to behold." 

But they continue, " Now that we have seized her goods, and given 
her notice that the King's pleasure is she shall go, she seemeth thereat 
to be somewhat appalled. And therefore we deem that it may be so, 
she will then utter somewhat when she is removed. This we intend 
shall be to-morrow, so that we have caused inventories to be made of 
her said goods, and of such things as may be easily carried, as plate, &c., 
and our purpose is to take them with us." 

They accordingly carried off the venerable lady to Cowdray Park, near 
Midhurst, where again they pestered her with their cross-examination, 
but still to no purpose. No trace or shadow of treason could be found 
in her ; she was evidently perfectly innocent of any crime. " We assure 
your lordship," the agents wrote to Cromwell, " that we have dealt with 
such a one as men have not dealt before with. We may call her rather 
a strong and constant man than a woman." However, the searchers left 
at Warblington had sent " certain bulls granted by a Bishop of Rome," 
found in one of the rooms, and this was sufficient in those days to 
condemn the most saintly. 

Meanwhile the martyr was left some months at Cowdray, where she 
was subjected to the grossest indignities by her unmannerly gaoler. 
During her imprisonment there her rooms and trunks were searched more 
than once, and in one of her coffers was found an embroidered vestment, 
which was to play a prominent part in the final tragedy. This was a 
tunicle of white silk on which were embroidered the Five Wounds of 
Christ, and other instruments of His Passion. 

This the King pretended to believe connected the Countess with the 
Pilgrimage of Grace, in which the Catholics of the North country had 
risen " for God, Our Lady, and the Catholic Faith," under the banner of 
the Five Wounds. It was also stated in Parliament that bulls from the 
Pope were found in her house, that she kept up correspondence with her 
84 




REGINALD CARDINAL POLE 
ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY 



Tofacepage 84 



A RUINED CASTLE BY THE SEA 

son, the Cardinal, and that she forbade her tenants to have the New 
Testament in English or any other of the books that had been published 
by the King's authority. 

On such evidence as this a bill of attainder was passed through the 
House of Lords in two days, the accused having no opportunity of defence, 
and no witnesses being examined ! The Commons were equally ready 
to gratify the King's thirst for blood, and the attainder was finally passed 
on June 28, 1539, and on this day the Countess was removed from 
Cowdray to the gloomy dungeons of the Tower. Here she lingered for 
nearly two years, "tormented by the severity of the weather and the 
insufficiency of her clothing." At last, quite suddenly as it seems, her 
martyrdom was decided on. Early in the morning of May 27, 1541, she 
was led out to die. She could hardly believe the news at first, and pro- 
tested that no crime had ever been imputed to her ; but soon, resigning 
herself to the divine will, she walked with a firm step to the place of 
execution, on East Smithfield Green, within the precincts of the Tower. 
Here she devoutly commended her soul to God, and begged the specta- 
tors to pray for the King and the royal family. She desired to be 
commended to them all, but especially to her beloved god-child, Princess 
Mary, to whom she sent her last blessing. 

She was then commanded to make haste and lay her head upon the 
block, which she did ; for the story of her refusal seems to be incorrect. 

The regular executioner being busy in the North, " a wretched and 
blundering youth had been chosen to take his place, who literally hacked 
her head and shoulders to pieces in the most pitiful manner." Her last 
words were: "Blessed are they who suffer persecution for justice' 
sake." 

Thus was consummated a piece of iniquity which it would be difficult 
to match in the annals of this country, even in those of this blood-stained 
period. And thus ended the kingly race of Plantagenet, winning in its 
death-throes a glory more brilliant than that of earth. For this noble 
victim of unnatural and savage tyranny entwined the golden boughs of 
the flanta genista with the palm branches of martyrdom. 

" Hitherto," said her son the Cardinal, when the cruel news was 
brought to him, " Hitherto I have thought myself indebted to the 
divine goodness for having received my birth from one of the most 
noble and virtuous women in England ; but from henceforward my 
obligation will be much greater, for I understand that 1 am now the son 
of a martyr. May God's will be done, and may He in all events be 
thanked and praised." 

In meditating on these facts amid the ruins at Warblington, our 
thoughts flew swiftly across Hampshire to the western limit of the country, 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

where it borders on Dorsetshire. There, wedged in between the estuaries 
of the Avon and the Stour, hard by the sea, rises the little town of 
Twyneham, encircling its Norman castle and its stately Priory Church. 
So important indeed was the Priory, that its name eventually gained the 
mastery over the old name of the borough, and now to all the world 
Twyneham is known as Christ Church. This is no place to describe the 
glories of that magnificent church, with its splendid Norman nave and 
fifteenth-century quire, its mediaeval reredos and quire-screen, its Lady 
chapel, which still retains its ancient altar, and its quaintly carved quire- 
stalls, where once the Austin Canons sang God's praises night and day. 
But here, amid a group of glorious chantries, stands out one pre-eminent 
in beauty, the chantry-chapel erected by the Blessed Margaret Plantagenet 
as her chosen place of sepulture. Even now, cruelly and savagely defaced 
as it has been, it is still, both within and without, a structure of ideal 
beauty, designed at the time when the old Gothic traditions were still 
strong, and yet the breath of Renascence was in the air, and the skill of 
Italian sculptors had begun to adorn, with detail of infinite and exquisite 
variety, the framework of English Perpendicular. This wonderful 
monument was intended to be the burial-place, not only of the martyred 
Countess, but of her son, the Cardinal. Needless to say that neither of 
them has found a resting-place within it. The splendid fan tracery of 
the vaulting within the chapel bears the royal arms of Plantagenet, and 
these were shockingly and of set purpose defaced by the "visitors " who 
came to suppress the Priory, on November 28, 1539. The notorious 
and infamous Dr. London was one of these, and he was shortly afterwards 
put to open penance for adultery and died in prison. He, too, no 
doubt, found pleasure in defacing the shield, sculptured with the five 
wounds, which may still be seen over the place where the chantry-altar 
once stood, another touching memorial of the martyr's love for this 
sacred emblem. She may indeed be called the " Martyr of the Five 
Wounds." 

Her martyred body lies in the gloomy chapel of St. Peter ad 
Vincula, within the precincts of the Tower, amid a company of fellow- 
victims, some like herself illustrious for their virtues, and others 
notorious for their crimes. There, side by side with the unhappy Anne 
Boleyn, and Henry's other murdered wife, Catharine Howard, lies this 
noblest victim of his rage ; and near her, in all probability, still lie her 
fellow-martyrs, John Cardinal Fisher, and Sir Thomas More. They all 
received the honours of beatification from Pope Leo XIII. in 1886, and 
we hope that the day will come when we may reckon them among the 
canonized saints. 

But Warblington has other memories yet for the Catholic pilgrim. 
86 




THE CHANTRY OF BLESSED MARGARET 
OF SALISBURY, CHRISTCHURCH, HANTS 

Photo by J. Miller To face page 86 



A RUINED CASTLE BY THE SEA 

The influence of the royal martyr seems to have lingered long there, 
and her spirit to have inspired its later owners. The Cottons of 
Warblington were foremost among the faithful Catholics of the penal 
days. The castle and estates which had been confiscated by the Crown 
had passed to the head of this family, during the Protestant reign of 
Edward VI. But Mr. George Cotton of Warblington deserves a high 
place in the roll of these heroic men, who suffered themselves to be 
despoiled of their goods rather than compromise their faith. These 
Recusants were ground down, as we have seen, by a most cruel and 
oppressive system of fines. The Parliament of 1581 imposed a penalty 
of 20 a month on all persons absenting themselves from church, 
and such as could not pay the same within three months were to be 
imprisoned until they should conform. The Queen, by a subsequent 
act, had the power of seizing two-thirds of the Recusant's land and all his 
goods for default of payment. Hallam says, " These grievous penalties 
for recusancy established a persecution which tell not at all short in 
principle of that for which the Inquisition had become so odious. Nor 
were the statutes merely designed for terror's sake to keep a check 
over the disaffected, as some would pretend. They were executed in 
the most sweeping and indiscriminate manner." 

Abbot Gasquet, in a valuable paper on the Hampshire Recusants has 
shown, from a careful examination of the Exchequer Receipt Books, 
and of the Recusant Rolls preserved at the Public Record Office, that 
Hallam's severe censure is more than justified. In the last twenty years 
of Elizabeth, the amount received by the Exchequer in fines from 
Catholic Recusants amounted to the enormous sum of 1 20,305 1 95. -]\d. ; 
and we must multiply this sum by at least ten to get the equivalent in 
modern money. 

The special Recusant Rolls do not begin till 1590, and are divided 
out into counties. In that of Hampshire, for this year, the first name of 
those fined at the rate of 20 a month, and thirteen months in the year, 
"for not going to church, chapel or other place of common prayer," 
was the name of George Cotton of Warblington, who pays 260 on this 
score. He actually paid the same enormous sum annually for at least 
twenty years. Abbot Gasquet says : " Imagine what such payments 
mean ; actually, in hard cash, this gentleman a man of considerable 
property about Havant in these twenty years paid in fines some 5200 
in money of those days, or something over 60,000 of our money. I 
did not myself for some time believe that this could have been the case, 
and supposed that although he was nominally fined that amount, the 
money was not actually paid. I have, however, satisfied myself that the 
cash was in fact handed into the royal treasury. In what are called the 

87 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Pells Receipt "Books . . . each six months is recorded a receipt of a 
moiety of the 260 which Mr. George Cotton is stated on the Recusant 
Roll to have paid. He begins in 1 586 by a small payment of ,1 5 6s. t>d. 
In 1587, on May 20, he pays 140, and the other moiety of the 260, 
namely 120, on November 24 ; on this day he also pays 199 6s. %d.^ 
said to be " in part payment of the sum of 1 199 6s. 8^." arrears of fines 
for not going to his parish church. By degrees he is forced to pay off 
these arrears. Thus on November 28, 1588, besides his usual six 
monthly moiety of the 260, he pays into the Queen's purse 433 6s. 8^., 
and a like sum at two subsequent dates." 

In 1586 the Catholics had been given hopes that they might perhaps 
purchase toleration by the payment of a yearly sum to the Queen. A 
commission was appointed, on April 13, to examine the Hampshire 
Recusants as to their ability to pay. Few were able to offer anything. 
Many of the Catholic gentry were in prison for their faith. But Mr. 
George Cotton promised to pay to the utmost of his power, which, 
however, is " but weak of itself, and hath been of late not a little 
diminished as well by ordinary charges of children and servants neces- 
sarily depending on me, as by manifold losses sustained, partly by long 
imprisonment, partly by the evicting of a great part of my living." He 
adds that he has lately arranged marriages for three daughters, and has 
seven children more depending on him. Still he concludes, " besides 
the great sums which I have paid for the statute of Recusancy, I offer 
^30 a year ; " and this he afterwards changed to 40. 

But this slight hope of toleration soon passed away, and as we have 
seen, for the next twenty years, Mr. Cotton was paying the crushing 
fines, seeing his estates and goods gradually melting away, and himself 
little by little reduced to penury. We find that at the end of Elizabeth's 
reign there were only sixteen Catholics left in the kingdom who were 
able still to pay the fine of ^20 a lunar month. The rest had forfeited 
two-thirds of their estates. These lands were leased out by commis- 
sioners appointed by the Crown for the purpose, and the lessee paid a 
certain rent into the Exchequer. 

Mr. Cotton of Warblington was one of the sixteen still not utterly 
impoverished. But beside the loss of property, he had to endure many 
another trial. His house at Warblington was a castle indeed, but it was 
no castle to him. At any moment, by day or night, it might be broken 
into by the pursuivants searching for priests or " Church stuff." The 
house was known to be a place of refuge for many a hunted priest, but 
if ever one should be found there, it would bring total ruin, yes, even a 
felon's death, upon his generous host. Yet shelter and a welcome was 
never refused at Warblington to any of the persecuted missionaries ; nay, 
88 




THE ARMS OF BLESSED MARGARET OF SALISBURY, FROM 
THE ROOF OF HER CHANTRY AT CH RISTCHURCH, 
DEFACED BY HENRY VIII. The centre hoss has a carving of the 
Coronation of Our Lady, also much mutilated. Photo l>\ J, -^Miller 




SHIELD OF THE FIVE WOUNDS, FROM THE 
CHANTRY OF BLESSED MARGARET OF SALIS- 
BURY. Photo by J. Miller 



To face page 88 



A RUINED CASTLE BY THE SEA 

they were received there as angels of God. The house was so near the 
sea that it became a convenient shelter for the young priests who came 
over from Douay or Rheims, at the peril of their lives, and landed at 
dead of night at some quiet nook of the Hampshire coast. The great 
gateway that had seen the Blessed Margaret of Salisbury borne out on 
her way to imprisonment, now witnessed many a furtive arrival at mid- 
night, and the gates that were cautiously opened to let in the priests of 
God, too often rang to the blows of the pursuivants hot in pursuit. In 
the State Papers we find more than one report from spies, mentioning pro- 
minent priests or Jesuits who found shelter at Warblington. One, dated 
1609, informs the Lord Treasurer that " in the house of Mr. Cotton, of 
Hampshire, there is harboured a Jesuit who names himself Thomas 
Singleton. He teaches the grandchildren of the said Cotton." Among 
other priests who made their abode at Warblington, we find Father 
Thomas Lister, S.J., a companion of the martyred Father Oldcorne, who 
had known imprisonment and exile, and the famous Father Baldwin, 
whose exciting adventures in the company of a band of church students 
I have described at length elsewhere.* The Government having 
released him from Bridewell, under the impression that he really was the 
Neapolitan merchant he pretended to be, this distinguished Jesuit took 
refuge with Mr. Cotton at Warblington, where he rendered great 
assistance to the Catholic cause. 

Warblington was in fact for many years a constant hospice, opened 
not only to priests but to the persecuted Catholics of every grade and 
condition. It went by the name of the Common Refuge. Mr. Cotton, 
who was an intimate friend of his saintly neighbour, Thomas Pounde, of 
Belmont (that noble confessor who was so dear to Father Edmund 
Campion), vied with him in doing his utmost to propagate the faith, 
and was in fact one of the most zealous to enlighten those blinded by 
the errors of heresy, and to confirm any Catholic who might be wavering. 
He suffered long years of imprisonment in Winchester gaol and in other 
places, and finally had the honour to die a confessor in chains. A letter 
written in 1614 records his end. The old man was despoiled of all his 
goods and consigned to a dungeon to the end of his days, which was hastened 
by hardships, filth, misery and a chronic malady. " The ministers, as if he 
were unworthy of Christian burial, would not allow his corpse to be buried 
in their churchyard, hence his remains are deposited in an open field." 

May we not say truly that our castle by the sea was the home of two 
most glorious martyrs of Christ ; for we cannot doubt that such pro- 
longed constancy crowned by so blessed a death merited for George 
Cotton of Warblington the martyr's crown and palm ? 

* In ike Brave Days of Old, "A Jesuit in Disguise." Burns & Dates. 1906. 

M 80 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

His family were worthy of him. One of his sons, John, was a 
student at Oxford, when Father Campion's fame attracted him to 
Lyford that he might hear the famous Jesuit preach. He was in con- 
sequence apprehended with the martyr, and suffered a year's confinement 
in the dungeons of the Tower. He was again cast into the Tower in 
the time of King James I., and remained there for five years, a close 
prisoner. Many other sufferings he bore for Christ, with a cheerful 
and joyous heart, and crowned a life of self-sacrifice with a saintly 
death in the year 1638. Other members of the family are found 
inscribed on the rolls of the Jesuits, the Benedictines and the Poor 
Clares ; for the holy example of their martyr moved them to a generous 
emulation in renouncing home and all earthly delights for the love of 
Christ. 

Nor were they less loyal to their earthly sovereign than to their 
heavenly king. 

Richard Cotton, our martyr's heir, was one of the most devoted 
adherents of Charles I. On him, as on all loyal Catholics, the vengeance 
of the victorious Parliament fell with double force, as the object both 
of civil and religious hatred. The exact date of the demolition of the 
splendid castle at Warblington is not known, but tradition assigns it 
to Cromwell's soldiers, and there is every reason to believe it, in this 
instance, to be correct. A detachment of troops was probably sent by 
Sir William Waller to dismantle it, either when proceeding to besiege 
Portsmouth, or after having recovered Chichester from the hands of the 
king's partisans, both of which events took place in 1642. 

After the building was reduced to a heap of ruins, its materials 
were dispersed over the country, and may be traced in various old houses 
in Emsworth, Havant and the neighbourhood. Even Portsmouth is 
said to have shared in the spoliation, and a street in that great town 
still bears the name of Warblington street, because it is believed to have 
been built out of the ruins of the old home of the Blessed Margaret 
and her faithful successors. 

The last of the Cottons of Warblington died unmarried about 1736. 
Thus they have passed away and left but little visible memorial behind 
them (we could find but one of their monuments in the church), yet 
the fragrance of their memory still seems to linger round the ruins of 
their ancient home, and it is good that their example should not be 
forgotten. 



90 



STONOR PARK AND ITS MARTYRS 

CERTAINLY for a place of pilgrimage it would be difficult to 
imagine a spot more beautiful and romantic than Stonor Park, 
the seat of Lord Camoys, head of the great Catholic family 
of Stonor. 

It is situated some five miles north of the famous riverside town, 
Henley-on-Thames, and lies in Oxfordshire, indeed, but so close to the 
Buckinghamshire border that the boundary-line on the south and east runs 
along the outskirts of the woods that crown the heights above the house. 
It is attractive for more reasons than one ; for its own picturesque 
beauty, for the long and honourable descent of the family that has 
owned it since the Norman conquest, and for the fact that it has ever 
remained Catholic, boasts of a chapel in which the Protestant service has 
never once been said, and has been the home of one illustrious martyr, 
and, in time of bitter persecution, the refuge of another yet more 
famous. 

It was, therefore, with feelings of unusual joy that the pilgrim found 
himself one bright autumn day making his way to Stonor. Would he 
not have the privilege of offering the Holy Sacrifice within walls seven 
centuries old, beneath a roof that had never echoed to any other sounds 
but the solemn chants and sacred words of the Latin liturgy ? Was he 
not to see a place which had been so dear a home to the Blessed Adrian 
Fortescue, Knight of St. John and martyr for the faith, and as sure a 
refuge to the Blessed Edmund Campion, the glory of Oxford and of the 
Society of Jesus ? 

So, with glad heart, he leaves behind him the fair wide river, gleaming 
bright in the sunshine, and drives quickly down the stately avenue, well 
called " The Fair Mile," that stretches straight as a dart, northward from 
the town. The five-mile drive seems long until the little village is 
reached at last, and the carriage pauses at the park gates. And then the 
beauties of the park unfold themselves. The drive curves round to the 
left and the great house lies before us. 

Very fair and stately it looks, stretching out before us on the hillside, 
built in the form of an E, with the Church adjoining the eastern wing. 
And yet there was a dash of disappointment in the view. The house, 
though undoubtedly ancient, has been sadly modernised in the dark 
days of the eighteenth or early nineteenth century. The picturesque 
gables have gone, gone are the mullioned windows, gone the old front 
of timber, brick, and flint which Leland saw. Ugly modern sash 
windows, more suitable for a factory than for such a mansion, deface the 
facade, and there is little left to tell of antiquity but the general outline 

9 1 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of the building, and the porch with its carving and statuary. And here, 
indeed, as we drive nearer, and pass from the deer-park into the enclosure 
of lawn and garden which surrounds the front of the house, we see 
something that almost compensates for all the rest. For in the gable 
over the porch is still seen the stone image of Our Blessed Lady keeping 
watch over the house. She stands upon the crescent-moon, and her 
hands are folded in prayer. She has stood there through the bright days 
and the dark, and, as the present head of the family said " we hope we 
are under her special protection." As we gazed on this glad symbol of 
our faith, we thought of Blessed Edmund Campion, drawn on his hurdle 
towards Tyburn, and striving with his fettered hands to make obeisance 
to the image of Our Lady of Newgate, which still stood above the arch 
under which he passed. How his brave heart must have been cheered 
and gladdened by the sight of Our Lady of Stonor, how often must he 
have bared his head to greet her during those secret breathless months, 
while the printing-press, hidden under the gables, was labouring out 
the burning words which were to put the adversary to silence and to 
shame ! * 

And there again to the right of us is the little Church of the Most 
Holy Trinity, which has stood there since the days of the third Edward. 
Happy little church, more happy than any of the great cathedrals 
which make England so famous ! Here then, where Mary has lingered 
almost alone in all this desolate land, here where Jesus in His Blessed 
Sacrament has deigned to dwell through seven centuries of sunshine and 
of storm, who can distress himself about mere antiquarian details, or fret 
over the loss of externals when the essential has been preserved ? 

Still, it must be acknowledged that it is with a pang that the eager 
pilgrim first enters the little Church of the Most Holy Trinity of Stonor. 
For think what it might have been ! Of course reflection should have 
warned him not to expect too much. In the perilous days of Elizabeth 
and James and Cromwell, how could it be possible that a papist chapel 
should preserve the splendours of its past intact ? Who could expect to 
find the sacred pyx still hanging under its canopy before the fourteenth- 
century altar ; the statues set up in 1349 still smiling from their niches in 
1909 ; the screen with the Holy Rood and Mary and John still spanning 
the sanctuary as of yore ; the storied glass unbroken ; the frescoes 
undefaced ? 

Alas ! the whole sad truth must be told there is absolutely nothing 
left ! The very tracery is gone from the windows, the tesselated pave- 
ment has been torn up, not a fragment of ancient glass, not a trace of 

* A tiny sketch of this statue will be found within the initial letter of the Preface 
to this work. 
9 2 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

mediaeval fresco, not a piscina, not an altar, not a statue, not a wreck or 
a fragment remains from the ages of faith. The new broom of a drastic 
restoration has swept away every trace of antiquity left by the heretical 
foe ; and the lovers of the past have to mourn a loss irreparable. 

And it is still more sad when we realise that most of this was done, with 
the best intentions, by the faithful, not by the foe. But these regrets 
are vain ; Stonor has its consolations that nothing can ever destroy. 

It should be explained, before we describe the house, that the east 
wing, apparently the oldest portion of the house, has been partly cut off, 
and turned into a residence for the chaplain. There is, however, com- 
munication on the upper storey between the main part of the house and 
a tribune in the church, which is reserved for the family and their friends. 

The porch is the most attractive part of the modernised house. On 
either side of the sixteenth-century doorway are two curious figures, with 
an enigmatical inscription below them, which has completely baffled the 
antiquaries. The inscription runs, 

On the left, On the right, 



OMNIBUS JUDICIO 
AEQUE TAMEN 



MEMET SINE 
COGNOSCO FRAUDE 



which seems to mean : " In all things justly, yet with judgment, I know 
myself to be without fraud." But what this refers to, or what the two 
pairs of figures mean, is a complete enigma. The house faces south and 
is built against the side of a hill, so that what is the first floor in the 
front of the house is the ground floor at the back, and opens on to the 
garden. The interior has been modernised at the same melancholy time 
as the front and the chapel, and the great hall has been cut up into rooms 
and disfigured by a staircase. 

The most interesting features of the house to the pilgrim are natu- 
rally the secret passages and hiding-places which the zeal of the Stonor 
family for the ancient religion made necessary. From the butler's pantry 
a secret underground passage used to run into the hill and emerge in a 
clump of trees in the park. It was in this tangled dell, amid shrubs 
and bracken, that the secret printing press of Blessed Edmund Campion 
was set up. At least so we were told by Lord Camoys. Another 
tradition has it that the press was concealed amid the labyrinth of attics 
and passages underneath the roof. At any rate, the passage referred to 
was used by the martyr and his assistants to convey the books and 
materials in and out of the house. The passage has now fallen in, and 
has become impassable, and the entrance from the pantry, long concealed 
by a cupboard, is now bricked up. 

There is also a secret passage in the roof of the house and a hidden 
94 




THE PORCH, STONOR PARK 

Photo by the author 



To j ace page 9+ 



STONOR PARK AND ITS MARTYRS 

place where holy Mass was offered during the days of persecution. This 
is entered from a room over the porch, the room which is guarded by 
the image of our Lady that stands outside it. In this room stands a 
wardrobe, which, being pushed aside, discloses a concealed door, opening 
into a small room beyond. In this room a triangular piece of the par- 
tition lifts up, and thus a hole is made through which a man of average 
size can just creep. 

From this hiding-place, which is small and dark, a rough ladder 
leads up into the roof of the central gable of the house, and another 
leads down from thence into a large attic under the roof of the main 
building. 

The religious history of Stonor begins (so far as public documents 
are concerned) with a licence of mortmain granted by King Edward III. 
to Sir John de Stonore in 1349. This document grants the royal leave 
to " give and assign a certain suitable place within his manor of Stonor 
for the sojourn and dwelling-place of six chaplains, regular or secular, 
to celebrate divine service for ever, in a certain chapel, founded within 
the said manor, in honour of the most Holy Trinity, for the good 
estate of Us and of the said John himself, during our lives, and for 
Our souls after that we have departed out of this life, and for the souls 
of Our progenitors and successors and the ancestors and heirs of the 
said John de Stonore, and of all the faithful departed." 

When the time came for the family to prove their attachment to the 
old religion they were not found wanting. The first sufferer for the 
faith who was connected with Stonor, was not indeed a member of the 
family by birth but by alliance. Sir Adrian Fortescue, Knight of St. 
John, now numbered among the Blessed Martyrs of England, was 
married to Anne, daughter of Sir William Stonor by the latter's wife 
Anne, daughter of John Neville, Marquis Montagu, and co-heir of her 
brother, George Neville, Duke of Bedford. 

Sir Adrian Fortescue was born in 1486. He came of an illustrious 
house, which owed its origin, it is said, to the Battle of Hastings, where 
Richard le Fort having saved the Conqueror's life by the shelter of his 
" Strong Shield," was henceforth known as Fort-Escue. In reference 
to this tradition his descendants took for their motto, Forte scutum salus 
ducum^ "a strong shield the safety of leaders." Our martyr's father, Sir 
John, held important posts at Court, and fought on the side of Richmond 
on Bosworth field. He married Alice Boleyn, and thus Sir Adrian was 
cousin to that unhappy woman whose rise was to bring about the fall of 
the old religion in England, and the shedding of rivers of innocent blood 
besides that of her kinsman. 

Sir Adrian is first mentioned in 1499, when he was already married. 

95 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

He was doubly connected with the Stonors, for in 1495 his wife's 
brother, John Stonor, married his sister, Mary Fortescue. On the 
death of her brother John, Lady Fortescue inherited Stonor, but her 
right to it was disputed by her uncle, Sir Thomas, and, after his death 
by her cousin, Sir Walter. Stonor Park was, however, retained by Sir 
Adrian Fortescue till Michaelmas, 1534. 

Lady Fortescue died in 1518, and in April 1534, the conclusion of 
his long lawsuit with the Stonors is recorded by the martyr in his book 
of accounts. His own plea was that, "by the courtesy of England," 
he was entitled to his wife's property for his life and her children after 
him. He waited on the King at Greenwich, but he was already suspected 
as " evil in religion," and before the summer was out, not only had he 
lost Stonor and all its broad lands, but was himself committed a prisoner 
to the Marshalsea Prison. He was released some time in 1535, and 
returned home, but no longer to the " fair park " of Stonor, for Stonor 
was his no more. Nor had he a long respite of freedom. Arrested 
once more in February 1539, he was attainted for having "most trai- 
torously refused his duty of allegiance " to the King's Highness, or, 
in other words, of having refused to recognise his title of Supreme 
Head of the Church of England. For this "crime " (of which he was 
certainly guilty) he was condemned without trial, and beheaded on 
Tower Hill on July 9, 1539. 

He has left an imperishable name behind him, and in 1895 he was 
numbered among the Blessed Martyrs who have made England glorious. 
And Stonor, his home for more than twenty happy years, is irradiated 
with the glory of his aureola. 

In the church at Husband's Bosworth is preserved Blessed Adrian's 
book of Hours, on the fly-leaf of which he has written and signed with 
his own hand a series of maxims or rules of the spiritual life, of which 
we may quote a few : 

" Above all things love God with thy heart." 
"Desire His honour more than the health of thine own soul." 
" Take heed with all diligence to purge and cleanse thy mind with oft confes- 
sion, and raise thy desire or lust from earthly things." 
" Resort to God every hour." 

" Be pityful unto poor folk and help them to thy power, for there you shall 
greatly please God." 

" In prosperity be meek of heart and in adversity patient." 
" And pray continually to God that you may do all that is His pleasure." 
"If by chance you fall into sin, despair not; and if you keep these precepts, the 
Holy Ghost will strengthen thee in all other things necessary, and this doing you 
shall be with Christ in Heaven, to Whom be given laud, praise and honour 
everlasting." 

"ADRYAN FORTISCVE." 
9 6 




BLESSED ADRIAN FORTESCUE, 
KNIGHT OF ST. JOHN 

From his picture at -JMa/ta 



To face page 96 



STONOR PARK AND ITS MARTYRS 

We must now pass over more than forty years, to find ourselves in 
the midst of the reign of Elizabeth, in the very thick of the persecution. 
Stonor was now to be glorified as the abode of a martyr even more 
illustrious than the Knight of St. John. The Blessed Edmund Campion 
was in the midst of his romantic mission, risking his life many times a 
day and all day long for the sake of the souls for whom he burned and 
hungered. 

At this time Stonor was in the hands of a lady, Dame Cecily, widow 
of Sir Francis Stonor,* who was the nephew and heir of the Sir Walter 
who had dispossessed Sir Adrian Fortescue. Though the martyr had 
had to give up his beloved home, it seemed that his spirit still lingered 
there, and that there was something in the very air of Stonor which gave, 
not only men, but women, courage to risk goods and lands and life in 
the cause of Christ. 

It was Dame Cecily's privilege to grant a shelter to the hunted priests 
of God, and not only that, but to give to the great Jesuit martyr the 
opportunity he needed for launching against triumphant heresy a thunder- 
bolt which shook it to its very foundations. For his little book, the 
Rationes Decent or Ten Reasons for the faith which was in him, addressed 
to the great University of Oxford, which was printed with infinite trouble 
and infinite risk in the shelter of Stonor Park, did perhaps more for the 
cause he had at heart than any book which has ever been issued in 
England. It was steeped in the life-blood of martyrs, for not only its 
writer, but one at least of its printers owed to it his crown and palm. 

It is not too much to say that the effect it had, first at Oxford and then 
throughout the country, can only be compared with that caused by 
Newman's Essay on Development. And Stonor is immortalised, if only 
that it gave birth to the ripest fruit of Campion's genius, a work of which 
grave men judged that it was " a truly golden book written with the finger 
of God." Father J. H. Pollen, S.J., in a valuable article in the Month 
(January, 1 905), has given at length the history of the secret press at 
Stonor. We cannot do better here than epitomise his story. 

Campion was asked in November, 1 580, to " write something in Latin 
to the Universities," and especially to Oxford men, of whom he had 
been the idol. And he proposed very characteristically to choose as his 
theme " Heresy in Despair." When his friends laughed at choosing a title 
so wildly inappropriate at a time when heresy was flourishing as it had never 
done before, he answered, that the very cruelty of the persecution 
evidently proceeded from despair, for if the heretics had any confidence at 
all in the truth of their cause, they would never proceed in such a way. 

Campion was just about to start on an arduous missionary journey 
* He had died in August, 1550. 

N 97 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

through the Midlands to Derbyshire and Lancashire. How was he to 
get time for writing, still less for study, amid labours so manifold and 
perils so tremendous ! His days were spent on horseback, his nights in 
preaching and administering the Sacraments. Death dogged him at 
every step, and the need of being ever on the alert must have been a con- 
tinual distraction. Books he could not carry with him his task seemed 
an impossible one. Yet he persisted in it, and overcame the difficulties 
triumphantly. Within a very few weeks, in February and March 
(1581), he had written the noble book which was to set England on fire. 

Circumstances, fresh attacks and fresh needs, led him to alter and 
improve his original plan. He resolved " to render to the Universities the 
' Ten Reasons,' relying upon which he had offered disputation to his adver- 
saries in the cause of Faith." In the introduction, however, he deals with his 
original theme, " Heresy in Despair." The present writer can never forget 
the delight with which he first came across a copy of this famous book. 
It was in the old monastic library of the great Abbey of Monte Cassino 
that he found it, and having found it, eagerly devoured it. The glow 
of Campion's eloquence, the romantic history of the book, the fame of its 
author, but recently raised to the altars of the Church, its dedication to 
the Oxford men of a bygone day, were enough to inspire interest in a 
modern Oxford convert ; and, as he read, interest quickened into 
enthusiasm. Surely never man wrote like this ! 

The wit and eloquence of the book are so amazing, amazing too the extra- 
ordinary dexterity with which he wields his rapier,piercing his adversary first 
in one point then in another, with inexorable skill, with bewildering dash 
and rapidity, with inimitable art. Eloquence clothed in the most majestic 
Latin, for Campion was a master of style ; humour and sarcasm mingled 
with passionate pleading ; fierce indignation against the falsehoods and 
blasphemies of heresy, melting into cries of anguished love which recall 
the plaints of One Who wept over Jerusalem all these and how much 
more are here. 

The " Ten Reasons " include Holy Scripture, the notes of the 
Church, the CEcumenical Councils, the Fathers, History, the paradoxes, 
sophisms, and crimes of the Reformers ; and they are all put forth with 
vigour, logic, and conviction. But what perhaps most amazes the reader 
is the extraordinary learning displayed. The martyr has the controversy 
at his fingers' ends, the quotations from the Fathers he has by heart, the 
infamies of Luther and his followers are quoted by one who knows of 
what he speaks. How was it possible to write such a book under such 
circumstances ? We can only reverently repeat : " the finger of God " 
Digitus Dei hie. This burning stream of controversy is poured out 
from the furnace of a heart white-hot with the love of God, even now 
98 



STONOR PARK AND ITS MARTYRS 

after these centuries. The book is alive, it is afire ; it enkindles and 
inflames. It is twelve years and more since I read it, but it lives with 
me still, and still I feel the glow. 

Well might Father Persons be amazed when he received it, some 
time before Easter, and saw the multitude of quotations with which it 
bristled. His prudence would not, however, allow him to publish it to 
the world without having the citations verified, well knowing how every 
slip would be seized upon by the adversary. Some young laymen, who 
had devoted themselves to helping the apostolic work of the Fathers, 
and had given up their wealth, their time, and their all to this noble 
cause, were glad to undertake this task. The most diligent of these was 
Thomas Fitzberbert of Swynnerton. He was then just married, but after 
his wife's death he became a Jesuit,* and a most distinguished member of 
the order. " At Persons' request," writes Father Bombino, " he visited 
the London libraries, for being a good man and a noted scholar, he 
could do so in safety. In fine, having found that all was quite accurate, 
he brought the good news to Persons, and urged on the publication of 
the work. 

Campion was now sent for, to see his book through the press. And 
now new difficulties came in crowds. Mr. Stephen Brinkley was the 
name of the devoted Catholic gentleman who had given himself to the 
printer's trade for the love or God, and he had already, at the most 
deadly risk, printed off three little books for Father Persons. But the 
old house near London was no longer safe, and it was necessary to find 
a surer hiding-place. And now another member of the gallant little 
band of laymen came forward with help. This was John, second son of 
Lady Stonor, and as devoted a Catholic as his mother. He suggested 
that Stonor would be a safe place, and convenient, being hidden in woods, 
near the river, and within reach of Oxford and London. Both he and 
his mother well knew the risk they were running by this generous action 
the risk of a cruel death for themselves and absolute ruin for their 
family. But no such fears could shake the resolution of these brave 
hearts. Lady Stonor's quality may be gauged from her answer to her 
judges when she was "convented" before them. Having been reproved 
for her constancy in the Catholic religion, she replied : " I was born in 
such a time when Holy Mass was in great reverence and brought up in 
the same faith. For King Edward's time, this reverence was neglected 
and reproved by such as governed. In Queen Mary's it was restored 
with much applause, and now in this time it pleaseth the State to question 
them, as now they do me, who continue in this Catholic profession. 
The State would have these several changes, which I have seen with my 

* See page 69. 

99 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

eyes, good and laudable whether it can be so, I refer it to your Lord- 
ships' consideration." 

This brave widow, then, was not likely to shrink from the danger ot 
harbouring priests and assisting in their great work. She gladly gave 
up her house to the Jesuit Fathers and their assistants, among whom 
John Stonor was proud to be reckoned. And so to Stonor " were 
taken all the things necessary, that is, type, press, paper, etc., though not 
without many risks. Mr. Stephen Brinkley, a gentleman of high attain- 
ments both in literature and in virtue, superintended the printing. Father 
Campion went at once to the house in the wood, where the book was 
printed and eventually published." So far Father Persons. 

There was grave risk of discovery from the number of extra men 
about the house, of whose fidelity it was not always possible to be abso- 
lutely sure. Traitors, indeed, there were among them, and one of them 
during this time caused the loss of all Persons' papers and other effects 
in London, and the apprehension of the Blessed Martyr Alexander Briant. 
But the work at Stonor went on safely. It was begun late in April and 
finished about the end of June, 1581. The time taken to print so small 
a book (it consisted of only about 10,000 words) seems surprising at first 
sight, but Father Pollen has shown very ingeniously, from intrinsic 
evidence, that the stock of type was very small. " The printers had to 
set up a few pages at a time, to correct them at once, and to print off, 
before they could go any further. Then they distributed the type and 
began again. When all was finished they rapidly stabbed and bound 
their sheets." There were only seven workmen at most, of whom five, 
including Stephen Brinkley, were subsequently arrested. Another was the 
Venerable William Hartley, afterwards a glorious martyr for the faith. 

For many years it was supposed that no copy of the edition printed 
by the martyrs was still in existence. Now, however, two copies are 
known, of which one was given to Stonyhurst College by the late Marquis 
of Bute. Father Pollen shows that the printing-frame was so small that 
it would have been covered by half a folio sheet, 9 by 13 inches. Each 
little sheet had to be printed off by itself. They had no Greek font, 
and though the book was printed in the new " Roman " type, they had 
to use the query-sign which belonged to the old English black-letter 
font. Their stock of diphthongs was also but a small one, and, as the 
text shows, soon gave out. Otherwise the little volume is distinctly 
well got up. There is nothing, indeed, at first sight to indicate the 
peculiar circumstances under which it was printed. 

Meanwhile Campion was not content to spend all the precious time 
at Stonor. Father Persons tells us that " he preached unweariedly, some- 
times in London, sometimes making excursions. There was one place 
100 




THE BLESSED EDMUND CAMPION, S.J. 



20 face page 100 



QVJBVS FRETVS, CERTA-. 

men adnerfarijs cbrultt in 
caufa FlDEl.Edmun- 
dusCampianus, 

Societatf Nominti 



clitiflimos viros, noftntes Acadcmico:- 



Ego dubo vobit os & fap 

' 



STONOR PARK AND ITS MARTYRS 

whither we often went, about five miles from London, called Harrow 

Hill. In going thither we had to pass through Tyburn. But Campion 

would always pass bare-headed, both because of the sign of the Cross, 

and in honour of some martyrs who 

had suffered there, and also because T\ -r^ 

he used to say that he would have IvatlOneS L^eCClTl ! 

his combat there." The hour of 

that combat was, indeed, soon to 

sound. 

The book was finished in time 
to be distributed at Oxford at Com- 
memoration. On Tuesday, June 27, 
the congregation who assembled in 
St. Mary's Church to hear the re- 
sponses of the students, found the 
benches strewed with the little books, 
hot from the press at Stonor. Four 
hundred copies had been brought 
post-haste to Oxford by the Vener- 
able W T illiam Hartley, who had dis- 
posed of them partly in this way and 
partly in gifts to various persons. 
The audience seized upon them with 
avidity, and the disputations of the 
students passed unnoticed, so ab- 
sorbed were all in reading Campion's 
burning words. " Some were furious, 
some amused, some frightened, some 
perplexed ; but all," says Simpson, 
" agreed that the essay was a model 
of eloquence, elegance, and good 
taste." 

Three weeks later Campion was 
captured at Lyford, and led in 
triumph to London. It was prob- 
ably the crowd of Oxford students, 
who had journeyed to Lyford to hear 
to bring about his apprehension. For 
the heart of Oxford was moved to its very depths, 
seal the work with his blood. 

When William Hartley, in his turn, won his reward at Tyburn, in 
1588, his mother, we are told, made a great feast to which she called her 

101 




fJUMO 3JL33I1(>VJ(IU03 Jj) 
Pfal.*). 

Sqjtt* [anmlonm ftfl* fttnt (lag* torvm. 

TITLE-PACE OF BLESSED EDMUND CAMPION^ 

Ten Reasons, PRINTED AT STONOR PARK 



him preach, that did most 
he had done his work, and 
He had now but to 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

neighbours and friends as to a marriage, bidding them rejoice with her, 
for she was the mother of a martyr of God. Thus St. Felicitas and the 
Blessed Mother of the seven Machabees had worthy followers in 
Elizabethan England. 

Campion was arrested July 17, 1581, and by the 2nd of August the 
Council was in possession of information which enabled them to seize 
the little colony at Stonor. They wrote to Sir Henry Neville, at Billing- 
beare, and ordered him " to repair unto the Lady Stonor's House and to 
search for certain Latin books dispersed already in Oxford at the last 
commencement, which . . . have been there printed in a wood. And 
also for such English books as of late have been published for the main- 
tenance of Popery, printed also there, as is thought, by one Persons, a 
Jesuit, and others. And further for the press and other instruments of 
printing, thought also to be there remaining." 

And so, two days before the Feast of our Lady's Assumption, the 
Madonna who looks down on Stonor might have seen a sad sight. A 
night raid by armed men upon that peaceful park, torches gleaming in 
the darkness, fierce battering down of doors and wainscot, triumphant 
arrest of the little band of faithful men. But they, like Campion himself, 
had done their work, and no more could it be undone. The press was 
seized, the books and papers, and a large quantity of " massing-stuff," 
chalices, vestments, altar-stones, all sanctified by a martyr's use. The 
Council ordered that the " massing-stuff" should be defaced, and the 
proceeds given to the poor, and the press, books, and papers were 
despatched to London. 

John Stonor was lodged in the Tower, and it is strange that his life 
was spared. One of the most romantic episodes of that strange time is 
connected with his name. Cecily, daughter of Sir Owen Hopton, Lieu- 
tenant of the Tower, saw her father's prisoner and fell in love with him. 
Whether or not he returned her affection, he succeeded in converting her 
to the faith for which he was suffering. Henceforth, while her father's 
rule lasted, she was ever ready to give her secret assistance to the Catholic 
prisoners. In 1584 she was denounced to the Government as conveying 
" letters and messages between the prisoners in the Tower and the 
Marshalsea," and her conversion and active ministry to the prisoners of 
Christ, became the principal cause . of her father's subsequent disgrace. 
John Stonor afterwards gained his freedom and went abroad, where he 
served in the army of the Prince of Parma. 

There would be much to add about th<" ufferings of the Stonors for the 
religion to which they clung so faithfully, but our space does not permit. 

In later times the family have given distinguished prelates to the 
Church. One of the best-known of the Vicars Apostolic who ruled the 
1 02 



STONOR PARK AND ITS MARTYRS 

Church in the eighteenth century was John Talbot Stonor, Bishop of 
Thespia, who died in 1756. And there are few to whom the name of 
Stonor does not recall a venerable prelate, the titular Archbishop of 
Trebizond, still happily living at Rome, and so well known for his kind- 
ness to all English pilgrims to the Holy City. 

Such then are the thoughts which Stonor Park suggests. And yet 
how little, in these days of freedom, can we even imagine what the grind- 
ing tyranny of that century and a half of persecution meant to the faithful 
few. To be branded as traitors for fidelity to conscience, must have been 
keenest pain to descendants of the heroes of Crecy and Agincourt. 
"Unless they will forget God," writes one, "and profess the errors which 
are here established, they will not only lose lands, liberty, and perhaps 
life, but, through these laws now passed through Parliament, they may 
leave tainted names to their children." 

" It is small wonder," says Falkner, in his County History, " that the 
Romanist creed was gradually battered out of Oxfordshire under such 
assaults as these. And yet there were some who dared to profess it in 
face of all, and the ' Recusants ' were duly registered by the Protestant 
rectors in each town and village. There is a list of eighty-eight such 
returns made by the parsons in Oxfordshire, preserved in the library at 
Stonyhurst. . . . 

" Many of the Recusants were in humble life, and quite unable to pay 
the fine, and in the case of those who could pay it, it is to be hoped that 
it was sometimes not exacted. But, although the Catholic gentleman was 
left very largely to himself, except in time of popular excitement, he was 
a pariah for more than two centuries, cut ofF from his fellow squires and 
looked on with a mixture of dislike and fear, exiled from the bench of 
magistrates, from all office and from public life in general, debarred from 
sending his sons to public school or university." 

But Catholic families, like the Stonors of Stonor, had taken for their 
motto the words of David : " Elegi abjectus esse in domo Dei mei, magis 
quam habitare in tabernaculis peccatorum.'" Outcasts and abjects they may 
have been in the eyes of their fellow countrymen, but how dear and how 
noble to God and His angels ! 



103 



MARKENFIELD HALL AND THE 
RISING OF THE NORTH 

" IT was the time when England's Queen 
Twelve years had reigned, a sovereign dread ; 
Nor yet the restless crown had been 
Disturbed upon her virgin head ; 
But now the inly-working North 
Was ripe to send its thousands forth, 
A potent vassalage, to fight 
In Percy's and in Neville's right, 
Two Earls fast leagued in discontent, 
Who gave their wishes open vent ; 
And boldly urged a general plea, 
The rites of ancient piety 
To be triumphantly restored, 
By the stern justice of the sword." 

WORDSWORTH, The White Doe of Rylstone. 

SURELY one of the most romantic houses left in England ! This is 
the thought that first strikes the mind of the pilgrim who is for- 
tunate enough to discover Markenfield Hall. And if as he gazes 
upon this grey pile of buildings already " an ancient house " in 
the days of Elizabeth he is able to recall the stirring story of its past, 
he is thrilled yet more with the sense of its romance. This splendid old 
pile, built in purest fourteenth-century Gothic of the time of the Third 
Edward, enlarged by its lords in the two following centuries, but happily 
untouched since then, stands as a monument of heroic deeds and knightly 
prowess. From its stately gateway mail-clad warriors passed forth to 
fight at Agincourt and Flodden, and in less happy days it was here that 
faithful hearts planned the desperate attempt to rise in arms for " God, 
Our Lady and the Catholic Faith," against the persecuting violence of 
heretical power. The great court-yard, now so peaceful and deserted, 
was once filled with armed men, each with a crucifix hanging on his 
breast, and a red cross upon his arm, grouped beneath the banner of the 
Five Wounds of Christ. It was from Markenfield that they rode forth, 
those loyal " rebels " of the faithful North, over the three miles of park 
and road to Ripon, there in the City of St. Wilfrid to proclaim the 
restoration of the ancient Faith and to cause Holy Mass to be sung again 
within the stately Minster. Surely the bones of St. Wilfrid, that doughty 
champion of Rome, must have thrilled with the joy of that day, when 
amid the glad tears of the faithful, Thomas Markenfield of Markenfield 
set up once more the High Altar in the desecrated sanctuary, and the 
Great Sacrifice which they had lost for ten sad years was pleaded once 
again in Ripon Minster. 
104 




o 



w 

E 
z 
w 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

Alas, how short-lived was the joy of that day ! But before we tell 
the story of the ill-fated Rising of the North, let us examine more closely 
the home of the Markenfields. 

It is not so easy to find nowadays, for it is hidden away among fields 
far from the main road. The motorists who rush along the road from 
Harrogate to Ripon little think what a world of beauty and of interest 
lies concealed among the hills to their left, approached by a mere cart- 
track, through fields of waving corn. And perhaps this is for the best, 
for automobiles are not quite in harmony with the old-world charm of 
Markenfield. 

The Hall was begun about the year 1310, when John de Merking- 
field, who had been Chancellor of the Exchequer under Edward II., 
obtained licence from the King to crenellate Markenfield, that is, to build 
a fortified and battlemented castle. 

The approach is not what it once was, for the stately park filled with 
magnificent timber which so delighted the Elizabethan Commissioners 
has given place to arable land and farm buildings. Markenfield, like so 
many stately homes of the past, has fallen from its high position, and is 
now a farm, though certainly a farmhouse that is unique of its kind. 

The moat is crossed by a solid stone bridge which has replaced the 
drawbridge of ancient days, and we pass under a simple but dignified 
perpendicular gate-house into the great court. This, as my photographs 
show, is a stately enclosure. Opposite the entrance, and on our right, 
lies the original fourteenth-century building, raising its lofty battlements 
and turret over the roofs of the humbler portions of the pile. 

This original part of the building is in the form of the letter L ; the 
great Hall with its splendid Gothic windows is immediately opposite the 
entrance gateway, and in the portion to the right is the ancient Chapel 
and priests' chamber. The Chapel is duly orientated, and has a very 
beautiful east window which we shall see from the opposite side. It is 
the south side of the hall which we now have before us. 

The entrance to the Hall was originally, according to Parker, by a 
doorway in one corner, from an external staircase, of which the 
foundations and the weather-moulding of the roof over it remain. 
Unfortunately a very ugly interior staircase has lately been erected 
which greatly spoils the fine old Hall, though it no doubt adds to the 
comfort and convenience of its present occupiers. 

The southern front of the building is continued to the west by a 
lower range, built in the fifteenth century. This front is adorned by a 
row of shields carved with coats of arms. It contains the present 
kitchen, a magnificent old-world room, of which we give a drawing ; its 
huge fire-place is big enough to roast an ox, and with its great beams 
o 105 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of oak, it gives a vivid idea of the hospitality of ancient days. The 
original kitchen seems to have been under the Chapel. The whole of 
the ground floor of the fourteenth-century house is massively vaulted 
in stone, and this applies not only to the main building, which contains 
the Chapel and Hall, but also to the retainers' lodgings which form 
the right side of the court, and also date from the fourteenth century. 1 
give a good photograph of one of the richly moulded doorways of this 
range ; the beautiful little window of the upper story will be noticed. 
Opposite the " lodgings " on the left side of the court are ranged the 
stables and outbuildings. Thus we have at Markenfield a very perfect 
picture of a mediaeval Manor House of the nobler sort. 

Before entering the house we should stroll round the moat and gaze 
at the different aspects of this glorious building.* Every view of it is a 
picture that will linger long in the memory. The eastern side shows us 
the back of the lodgings, and beyond them the exquisite tracery of the 
Chapel window. Beyond this are seen the windows of the Solar or 
family parlour which adjoined the Hall. One most charming little 
lancet can just be seen peeping above a fine yew-tree. At the time we 
took these photographs the moat was dry, as part of the wall had fallen 
into it, and was under repair. This detracts from the picturesqueness of 
the view, but enables us to see the depth of the moat. We should notice 
the battlements pierced cross-wise for arrows. Coming round to the 
north we have before us the windows and buttresses of this side of the 
Hall, and note that one of the windows has been blocked by a huge 
chimney of later date. 

The interior of Markenfield, as is the case with so many old houses, 
is less interesting, because more modernised than the exterior. The 
Hall has lost its ancient open roof, although the stone corbels that 
supported it still remain. The modern floor is cut up by the staircase 
already mentioned and by hideous glazed holes which serve as skylights 
to the passages below. 

It is some consolation to find the doorway to the Chapel intact, and to find 
that it still retains its ancient bar of wood, which slips into a hole in the jamb 
of the doorway. The Chapel itself, which is entered from the Hall, 
is still impressive, though now so desolate and changed. It is at least a con- 
solation to find that it is not used for any domestic purpose. A 
piscina and aumbry still remain, and on the sill of the east window is a 
curious block of stone. This seems to have formed part of the reredos, and 
perhaps was a pedestal for the crucifix. It is grooved down the front, 
and the groove continues down the wall below. Altogether it forms a 
curious archaeological puzzle. On the south side of the Chapel is a 

* See facing pages 112 and 114. 
1 06 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

doorway leading to the priests' chamber, and close by is the staircase 
turret. This is octagonal in plan, and is crowned with a conical roof of 
stone. It leads to the flat roof, from which a fine view may be had. 
To the north-west of the house is a conical hill called How Hill, which 
overlooks the famous Cistercian Abbey of Our Lady of Fountains, on 
the summit of which the monks had a sanatorium of which some remains, 
still, we believe, exist. Fountains Abbey, the most wonderful and romantic 
ruin in all England, is only about two miles distant from Markenfield. 

The old Hall belongs to Lord Grantley, who bears as a secondary 
title the name of Markenfield. He has hung on its walls many of his 
family pictures, and among them one of surpassing interest, the portrait 
of his ancestor, old Richard Norton of Norton Conyers, the Patriarch of 
the Rising of the North. 

He and Thomas Markenfield were indeed the true originators and 
leaders of this second Pilgrimage of Grace. It was their zeal which 
almost forced into action the heads of the great northern houses of Percy 
and Neville, and although once they had been joined by the Earls of 
Northumberland and Westmoreland, their own part in the Rising 
necessarily became a secondary one, yet it was constantly asserted by 
both friend and foe that " Old Norton " and Markenfield were the 
mainsprings of the cause. 

It is to the memory of old Richard Norton and his heroic sons that 
Wordsworth has devoted some of the fairest fruits of his genius in his 
White Doe of Ryhtone, though it would be a mistake to take the 
poet's song for history. And Lord Grantley, who is the descendant of 
the Nortons, as well as the owner of Markenfield, has done well to 
hang the portrait of old Richard Norton on these historic walls. We 
think ourselves fortunate at having secured so excellent a photograph 
of this portrait of the hero, who with his white hair streaming in the 
wind, carried the standard of the Crucified before the insurgent host. 

Richard Norton of Norton Conyers was at this time an old man of 
seventy-one. But years had not dampened his ardour, nor dimmed his 
zeal for the old religion. He had a very large family, eleven stalwart 
sons and eight fair daughters, by his first wife, Susan, fifth daughter 
of Richard, Lord Latimer. He was governor of Norham Castle and 
a member of the Council of the North under Mary the Catholic, and 
at the time of which we are writing he held the very important posi- 
tion of High Sheriff of York. The reasons which finally decided 
him to join in the Rising, in spite of the official position which he 
held under the Crown, were his attachment to the Catholic faith and 
his warm regard and friendship for Blessed Thomas Percy, Earl of 
North umberland. 
1 08 




DOOR IN THE LODGINGS, MARKENFIELD HALL 

Photo by the author To face page io3 



t 
t- . 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

Camden describes Norton as " an old gentleman with a reverend grey 
head, bearing a Cross with a streamer." 

"The Norton's ancient had the Cross 
And the Five Wounds Our Lord did bear." 

In his portrait,* which is well painted, the countenance is florid, the 
hair grey, but the slight beard is of a sandy colour. The eyes are small 
and grey, the colour is pleasing, and the general expression is grave but 
not stern vigilant, wary and contemplative. He looks like one better 
fitted to shine at council-board than "to rise in such a fray." The arms 
of Norton azure a maunch ermine debruised with a bend gules are 
painted on the picture. It is said that there are also portraits of two of 
the sons at Wonersh near Guildford. 

"Thee, Norton, wi' thine eight good sons, 

They doomed to die, alas ! for ruth ! 
Thy reverend locks thee could not save, 

Nor them their fair and blooming youth " 

runs the old ballad of the Rising of the North. It is quite true that they 
were all condemned to death, but they did not all perish, as the ballad 
followed by Wordsworth in his White Doe of Rylstone would have it. 

The sons were Francis, the eldest, who escaped with his father ; 
John, who became a glorious martyr at the age of seventy-six, for having 
harboured the seminary priest, Venerable Thomas Palasor (they suffered at 
Durham, August 9, 1600); Edmund, who does not appear to have 
taken part in the Rising, and who is lineal ancestor of the present 
Lord Grantley, owner of Markenfield Hall ; William, who was confined 
in the Tower some time, and was probably pardoned, on composition ; 
George, also condemned to die, but perhaps pardoned for a consideration ; 
Thomas, who had no part in the Rising ; Christopher, who was executed 
at Tyburn with his uncle Thomas, May 27, 1570; Marmaduke, the 
eighth son, who was still a prisoner in the Tower on July 14, 1572, 
but was probably pardoned on composition. He died at Stranton in 
the County of Durham, November 2, 1594. The ninth son was Sampson, 
who died in exile abroad, probably in 1574, and there were two younger 
yet, Richard and Henry, who seem to have had no share in the Rising. 
Beside these eleven sons, " old Norton " had eight daughters, who all 
married scions of good old families in Yorkshire or Durham. 

But to return : Thomas Markenfield of Markenfield Hall, in 1569, 
had already been for some years an exile for his faith. To him, as secret 
envoy from the Holy See, came Dr. Nicholas Morton, an old friend 
and connection of his family, who had in happier times been Prebendary 

* See facing page 1 16. 

109 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of York. He brought news that the Pope was about to take action 
against the Queen, and persuaded Markenfield to return with him to 
England to assist in preparing men's minds for the coming struggle. 

Markenfield naturally first sought out his old friend and neighbour, 
Richard Norton of Norton Conyers. Norton is only some five miles 
distant from Markenfield on the other side of Ripon. It is still a very 
fine place with a grand old park. 

According to Francis Norton, the main instigator of the Rising 
was Dr. Morton. " He used such persuasions to the Earl of North- 
umberland, and to my father, whom he had served in times past, and to 
many others where he had travelled to and fro for the same purpose." 
He told them that the Queen was about to be excommunicated, and that 
they would run both their own souls and their country into the greatest 
danger, if they did not seek at once to restore the ancient faith. For 
they would share in the excommunication if they held to the Queen, 
and if they did not reform things from within the realm, other Christian 
princes would invade the Kingdom to depose the excommunicated 
Sovereign. This was indeed no imaginary danger, and we can well 
understand how it would affect men who were at once passionately 
devoted to the old religion, now proscribed and persecuted, and at the 
same time ardent lovers of their country. From this point of view the 
Rising of the North has a patriotic as well as a religious aspect, and 
scrupulous consciences like Northumberland's might well doubt if it 
were lawful to uphold a monarch certainly illegitimate, and denounced 
by the Head of the Church as a heretic and an enemy of the pure faith. 

Francis Norton goes on to tell how Blessed Thomas Percy sent for 
his father and broke his mind to him, " declaring the great grief he had, 
for that they all lived out of the laws of the Catholic Church ; for the 
restitution of which he would willingly spend his life." By his father's 
command Norton had then an interview with the Earl in a field, in 
which he was won over to the cause. 

The two motives which induced the Earl of Northumberland to 
take action were, as we know from his own " confession," the restoration 
of religion and the naming of an heir to the throne. The true heir was 
undoubtedly Mary Queen of Scots, and the fear that she would be set 
aside or got out of the way, to the utter destruction of Catholic hopes, 
forced the great nobles to take action. " It was thought," says 
B. Thomas Percy, " that all the realm would be in a hurly burly about 
the same ; which occasion moved me most especially not only to send to 
the Duke [of Norfolk], but also to assemble my friends, and to advise 
with them, and to know their inclinations." But this assembling brought 
such suspicion upon the Earl and his brother of Westmoreland, that 
no 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

they were peremptorily summoned to York to give an account of their 
doings to the Council of the North, a summons which forced them into 
premature action. The Earl confided his dangerous position to old 
Richard Norton (as we learn from the "confession" of his young son, 
Christopher), " which grieved him exceedingly, for it was his duty as a 
Queen's officer to disclose what the Earl had told him ; but the Earl 
reminded him that he had been a servant in his grandfather's house, and 
that he confided in him as a man of honour, and his countryman." 

Francis Norton, Leonard Dacre, and Markenfield were eager to 
release the Queen of Scots and conferred with B. Thomas Percy as to 
how it might best be effected. The two former went secretly to Lord 
Shrewsbury's to see if there were any chance of getting her conveyed 
safely out of his hands, but returned after two days' absence reporting 
that they could not bring it to pass. Their intention in releasing her, 
says the Earl, was " that we hoped thereby to have some reformation in 
religion, or at the least some sufferance for men to use their conscience 
as they were disposed, and also the liberty of freedom of her whom we 
accounted the second person [in the Kingdom] and the right heir 
apparent." 

Norton and Markenfield were more earnest in persuading North- 
umberland to join the rising ; urging that they had already gone so far 
that they could not draw back without disgrace, and that they would 
have to fly the country. " This would be a marvellous blot and discredit, 
thus to depart and to leave off this godly enterprise, that is so expected 
and looked for at our hands throughout the body of the whole realm." 

Markenfield had the confidence of Dr. Morton, and told the Earl 
of Northumberland that the Doctor thought it was lawful for him to 
take up arms against Queen Elizabeth, as having been lawfully ex- 
communicated by the Head of the Church. And he said, according to 
Markenfield that, since the Queen refused to receive the Pope's 
ambassador, she was for that cause lawfully excommunicate, and so it 
was lawful to take arms against her. " This much did Markenfield 
report of the said Dr. Morton. . . . ' The most of us,' adds Francis 
Norton, ' thought it was rather his own imagination, to advance the 
matter than otherwise ; yet, notwithstanding, the other two divines 
consulted thought it not sufficient, unless the excommunication had been 
orderly published within the realm.' ' 

Whatever may be thought of these arguments, it was, according 
to Northumberland himself, old Norton and Markenfield who finally 
prevailed with the Earls to take active measures, and their counsel 
was seconded by that of the two Countesses. Their motives may be 
judged by the declaration of another member of their party, Mr. Smythe 

in 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of Eshe, near Durham. He is reported to have told a friend who met 
Him riding, muffled, to Brancepeth, that the setting up of religion was 
their purpose. " How can that be, when you shall be rebels to our 
Queen, and so act against your consciences ? " he was asked. " No," 
he said, " that is not so, for the Pope has summoned this land once, 
and if he summon it again, it is lawful to rise against the Queen, and 
to do it if she will not ; for the Pope is Head of the Church." 

These conferences were held during the early days of November, 
1569, at Brancepeth Castle near Durham, the seat of the Earl of West- 
moreland, where the leaders of the movement had assembled. 

Brancepeth Castle, a magnificent feudal pile, much added to and 
modernised at the beginning of the nineteenth century, stands on the 
side of a steep and wooded dell, through which runs a rivulet. The 
situation is very romantic. The country west and north of Brancepeth 
is poor and bare, and soon stretches into bleak and comfortless hills, 
which are now seamed with collieries and covered with hideous mining 
villages. But the home view to the river is rich and cultivated, and the 
castle is surrounded with a noble park hemmed in by luxuriant woods. 
Between the dell and the castle walls lie lawns and gardens, shrouded by 
the rich foliage of the trees which spring from the bed of the rivulet. 
The fine old church lies within a stone's throw of the castle gates, and is 
one of the most' interesting in the country. 

To Brancepeth then the eyes of all the North Country were turned, 
and the assembly there speedily became an object of suspicion to the 
government officials. Thanks to the publication of the State papers, we 
are now able to read the reports sent up to the government day by day 
from the perturbed officials in the North. Foremost among them were 
the Earl of Sussex, Lord President of the Council of the North, and 
Sir George Bowes, who was stationed in the county, or as it was then 
called, the Bishopric of Durham. Durham had indeed a peculiar position 
in the country. It was the Patrimony of St. Cuthbert, a palatinate 
governed by its Bishop Palatine, who enjoyed full secular as well as 
spiritual jurisdiction. The change of religion had not affected this 
mediaeval arrangement, and the bitterly Protestant Pilkington, who now 
usurped the chair of St. Cuthbert, was also civil ruler of the Bishopric, 
of course in due subordination to the Sovereign. 

On November 7 we find Bowes reporting to Sussex that "the 
retainers of the Earl of Westmoreland with the most part of all his 
tenants of his Lordship of Raby, being furnished with armour and 
weapons, in their warlike apparel repaired to Brancepeth yesterday, and 
this night past, and that his other tenants had been ordered to set out at 
an hour's warning." He adds that Norton was there with the Earl of 
112 




f 



DC 

H 

S 

3 
aj 
-^ 

-1 



t 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

Northumberland. On the roth he reports that Francis Norton and 
divers of his brethren, with twenty-nine horse, all armed, had gone there, 
and that in another company had ridden Thomas Markenfield with the 
Sheriff of Yorkshire and thirty horsemen, all armed in corslets under 
jerkins. 

The riders who left Markenfield Hall, to obey the summons of the 
head of the Nevilles, no doubt wore their armour concealed under their 
ordinary attire, in order not to attract attention. Sir George Bowes 
reported that the Earl of Northumberland was armed in a privy coat, 
under a Spanish jerkin (which was open so that the coat of armour could 
be seen), and a steel cap covered with green velvet. He says " marvel- 
lous great fear ariseth here in these parts ; for they pass in troops, armed 
and unarmed, so fast up and down the country that no man dare well 
stir anywhere, and it is every hour looked that they will do some evil 
enterprise, and make open stir . . . and yet for anything that in certainty 
I can perceive, they gather rather for their own safety than to annoy, for they 
are not as I well know, above three hundred. . . ." " All their faction " 
could not exceed more than this number, he thought, that had any arms 
or weapons, but " they presently sweep up all manner of weapons and 
armours that can be gotten for money ; for this day they bought all the 
bows and arrows in Barnard Castle, and, as I hear, at Durham." 

He adds in a postscript : " But now presently it is advertised to me 
that their enterprise shall be set forth before Sunday, and that should be 
to make open call of men for alteration of religion, and to spoil such as 
will not follow their directions, and prove if this will move the multitude 
to follow them, and if it will not, they have a ship ready to pass away. 
But this is a report, delivered upon great uncertainty." 

The alarm was now given. Sussex wrote in haste on the I3th that 
he heard that they " were to have an open Mass this day in Durham. 
1 pray you understand the truth." 

The news was true. The scruples of Blessed Thomas Percy had 
been finally overcome, or rather he was almost forced into action. And 
now the die was cast. On November 14, the great gates of Brancepeth 
were flung open and the venerable form of Richard Norton was seen 
advancing with the standard of the host, a gleaming crucifix. His white 
hair streamed in the wind, and his face was fired with high enthusiasm 
for what he deemed a holy and a sacred cause. Behind rode the Earls, 
with their banners, Markenfield and the other leaders, each with a large 
golden crucifix around his neck. The horsemen that followed them all 
bore the cross, as for a new crusade. 

Rapidly they rode over the four miles which divide Brancepeth from 
the City of St. Cuthbert. 

p 113 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

What they there did let Bowes report : 

" Yesterday at 4 o'clock in the afternoon, the Earls accompanied by 
Richard Norton, Francis, his son, with divers others of his said sons, 
Christopher Neville, Cuthbert Neville, uncles of the Earl of Westmore- 
land, and Thomas Markenfield, with others, to the number of three 
score horsemen, armed in corslets and coats of plate, with spears, arque- 
buses and dagges [pistols], entered the minster at Durham and there 
took all the books but one, and them and the communion-table defaced, 
rent and broke in pieces." 

This letter of Bowes' was written in such haste and confusion of 
mind that it is actually addressed to " my singular good Lord the Earl of 
Westmoreland, Lord President of the Queen's Majesties counsell estab- 
lished in the North parts," instead of to the Earl of Sussex ! " It is 
also (says Sir Cuthbert Sharpe) exceedingly difficult to read." 

It is not difficult to imagine the enthusiasm with which the restora- 
tion of the ancient worship was welcomed at Durham on November 14, 
1569. Though the Earls and their company only stayed a few hours 
there, returning to Brancepeth that evening, and setting out next day 
with their army southwards, they had lighted a fire at Durham which 
could not be easily extinguished. They found a watch of twenty-four 
of the townsmen quite sufficient to guard the city, for, as Sussex had 
afterwards to admit to the Queen, " there was no resistance made, nor 
any mislike of their doings." The Protestant clergy, with their worthy 
Bishop, fled from the city, and those who had remained faithful took 
their places. The majority of at least the inferior clergy attached to the 
Cathedral were eager to help in the good work. Faculties from Rome 
had been entrusted to certain leading priests (including the chaplain of 
the Earl of Westmoreland) to absolve from schism and heresy both 
clergy and people, and we have stirring accounts of the joy with which 
the people flocked to hear High Mass sung once again in the great 
Church of St. Cuthbert and of their eagerness to receive upon their 
knees the public absolution from censures which was solemnly 
pronounced on Sunday, December 4. The Protestant service-books 
from the churches were publicly " burnt at the bridge end," the ruined 
altars rebuilt, the holy water stoups set up again, and from many a 
hidden store, hands trembling with joy brought forth the sacred vest- 
ments and ornaments of the Church which had been carefully concealed 
in the hope of a better day. Thousands flocked to the great Minster 
to hear once more the old familiar chants of Mass and Vespers, and say 
their beads again in public to the honour of God's Mother, and, best of 
all, to be shriven from their sins and receive once more the Bread of 
Angels in the Sacrament of Love. Later on, when the Rising had been 
114 




w 





i h 



w 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

quenched in blood, these poor people had to suffer for having (in the 
words of authority) "by the instigation of the devil, come to Mass, 
Matins, Evensong, procession and like idolatrous service, thereat 
kneeling, bowing, knocking, and such like reverent gesture, used praying 
on beads, confession or shriving to a priest, took holy water and holy 
bread," and, above all, for having "among other like wicked people, 
knelt down and received absolution under Pope Pius' name in Latin, 
false-terming this godly estate of England to be in schism or heresy." 

If in that sad day not all were faithful, not all courageous, who shall 
dare to blame them too severely ? Many at least were true, for years 
afterwards the Protestant Bishop angrily complained of the Church of 
Durham that " its stink is grievous to the nose of God and men, and 
which to purge far passeth Hercules' labours." The same scenes of 
joyful reconciliation to the Church of Christ were seen wherever the 
army of the Earls appeared. At Staindrop, at Darlington, at Richmond, 
and Northallerton, Holy Mass was sung again amid indescribable scenes 
of joy and devotion. It was about the 2oth of that fateful November 
that they came to Ripon. Here in the market-place they raised the 
banner of Christ's Five Wounds, and in St. Wilfrid's Minster celebrated 
the Holy Sacrifice. The stately halls of Norton and Markenfield were 
in gala that day. All Yorkshire thrilled with joy. "There are not ten 
gentlemen in all this country," wrote Sir Ralph Sadler to Cecil, " that favour 
the Queen's proceedings in religion. The common people are ignorant, 
superstitious, and altogether blinded with the old Popish doctrine, and 
therefore so favour the cause which the rebels make the colour of their 
rebellion." 

The Proclamation of the Earls ran as follows : 

" Thomas, Earl of Northumberland, and Charles, Earl of Westmore- 
land, the Queen's most true and lawful subjects, and to all her highness's 
people sendeth greeting : 

"Whereas divers new set up nobles about the Queen's Majesty, have 
and do daily, not only gone about to overthrow and put down the 
ancient nobility of this realm, but also have misused the Queen's 
Majesty's own person, and also have by the space of twelve years now 
past, set up and maintained a new found religion and heresy contrary to 
God's word. For the amending and redressing whereof, divers foreign 
powers do purpose shortly to invade these realms, which will be to our 
utter destruction, if we do not ourselves speedily forefend the same. 
Wherefore we are now constrained at this time to go about to amend and 
redress it ourselves, which if we should not do and foreigners enter upon 
us we should all be made slaves and bondsmen to them. These are, 
therefore, to will and require you, and every of you, being above the age 

"5 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of sixteen years and not sixty, as your duty towards God doth bind you, 
for the setting forth of His true and Catholic religion ; and as you tender 
the common weal of your country, to come and resort unto us with all 
speed, with all such armour and furniture as you, or any of you, have. 
This fail you not herein, as you will answer the contrary at your perils. 
God save the Queen." 

Leicester and Cecil "and others of the most painful and dutiful 
servants to the Queen's Majesty " were specially aimed at. Sussex 
ssued a counter proclamation on November 19, by virtue of the Queen's 
warrant, denouncing the Earls, Norton, Markenfield, and the rest as 
rebels against her Majesty and disturbers of her realm. He promised, 
at the Queen's own suggestion, to pardon those "of the mean sort" who 
would desert their leaders and return home by November 23, but 
expressly exempted from this pardon the Earls themselves, Christopher 
Neville, Egremond Ratcliffe, Richard Norton, Thomas Markenfield, 
John Swinburn, Robert Tempest, Francis Norton, and Thomas Gennye 
(Jennings). 

On November 20, the Council at York write to the Queen that the 
levies come in slackly. " The people like so well of their cause ot 
religion, as they do flock to them in all places where they come ; and 
many gentlemen show themselves ready to serve your Majesty, whose 
sons and heirs, or other sons, be on the other side." And Sir George 
Bowes writes to Sussex from Barnard Castle on November 23 : " Daily 
the people flee from these parts to the Earls, and I know not what should 
be done to stay them, for I have notified their unloyal and rebellious 
dealings, and with fair speech and bestowing of money, used those that 
came to me in the most gentle manner I could. But it availeth nothing, 
for they still steal after them. . . . Many be not gone, that yet concealeth 
them in woods and other places, and will not come before me, for any 
precept or commandment, and the Earls have caused two or three lewd 
fellows of theirs to proclaim me a traitor and heretic." 

The whole number engaged in the insurrection was computed at 
twenty thousand. " For all the inhabitants of the Bishopric and Rich- 
mondshire, a few only excepted, were all rebels," writes the Lord President 
of the North to Cecil in 1573. But Lord Huntingdon ascertained that 
there were never more than five thousand five hundred on the field together, 
of whom one thousand seven hundred were light horsemen, and three 
thousand three hundred foot soldiers. But of these latter there were 
not more than five hundred properly armed, and those only with bows 
and arrows, jacks and bills. 

As a matter of fact the movement was doomed to failure from the 
first. Hurried into action, the leaders had no time for proper prepara- 
116 




RICHARD NORTON, OF NORTON CONYERS, 
STANDARD-BEARER OF THE NORTHERN 
RISING. Photo by the author To face page -L 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

tions, nor did the hoped-for succour from abroad come to their assistance. 
Their host was badly disciplined and ill-equipped, and it may be doubted 
if the leaders themselves had many of the necessary qualities for success. 
They were no match for the crafty and resolute Sussex, who was biding 
his time in York till reinforcements could arrive from the south, and 
steadily making his preparations for attack. If, however, the Earls had 
marched on to York, and arrived there while Sussex was still unpre- 
pared, they would have had a good chance of victory. Sussex's letters 
to Cecil betray his great anxiety. But, after reaching Wetherby on 
November 23, the failure of supplies and money, and unfortunate dif- 
ferences of opinion among the leaders, put a stop to further progress. 
They turned again northwards, and henceforth their cause was lost. 

Much time was wasted in besieging Barnard Castle, where Sir George 
Bowes had entrenched himself. Here a remarkable proof of the popu- 
larity of the Rising was given by the conduct of the garrison, no fewer 
than 226 of whom during one day and night leapt from the castle walls 
to join the Earls. Thirty-five of these, we are told, " brake their necks, 
arms or legs in the leaping." Ten days later Sir George Bowes had to 
capitulate, and was allowed to retire to York. But Sussex was now in 
the field, and proceeding most vigorously to the attack. Little by little 
the insurgent host melted away. The last council of war was held at 
Durham on December 16, only a month and a day from the beginning 
of the Rising, and the conclusion was Sauve qui pent. 

The leaders rode towards Hexham, quickly pursued by Sussex and 
his army, and from Northumberland they crossed the border into 
Scotland. Here, among the hereditary foes of England, they were 
comparatively safe. 

The whole North was now at the mercy of Sussex, whom the Queen 
had specially charged to execute on the offenders the full severity of 
martial law. The only consideration that could temper her fury was a 
pecuniary one, for Elizabeth loved money even better than blood. 

On December 25, Lord Sussex writes to Cecil from Hexham : 
" Touching present commodity, I find that all the forfeitures by this 
late rebellion [which] should grow to the Queen's Majesty in the 
Bishopric, will indeed by the laws of the realm, fall out in the end to 
the Bishop ; which will be too great for any subject to receive. And, 
therefore, before I proceed against the offenders that have estates of 
inheritance or great wealth, I think it very necessary that the Queen's 
Majesty should either compound with the Bishop for his royalties, 
and keep them still in her hands, or translate him to some other 
Bishopric ; whereby, sede vacante, all might grow to her Majesty." 

The Queen's frugal mind had been greatly vexed by the expense of 

117 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

the expedition, and Cecil sent on her letters to Sussex showing how 
" earnest she was to have you take care to diminish her charges, 
wherewith she seemeth to be much grieved." 

She had had to send ten thousand pounds in gold to York, which 
indeed vexed her sorely. 

Sussex wrote to Cecil on December 28 : "I mean to pass to 
Durham where I intend to remain some days, to take order for such 
of the common people as shall be executed by the martial law ; 
among whom I mean to execute specially constables and other officers, 
that have seduced the people (under colour of the Queen's Majesty's 
service) to rebel ; and such others as have been most busy to further 
those matters, so as there shall be no towne that hath sent men to the 
rebels, or otherwise aided them, but some of the worst disposed shall 
be executed for example : the number whereof is yet uncertain, for 
that I know not the number of the towns, but I guess it will not be 
under six or seven hundred, at the least, that shall be executed of 
the common sort, besides the prisoners taken in the field ; wherein I 
trust to use such direction, as no sort shall escape from example ; and 
that the example shall be (as it is necessary that it should be) very great, 
wherein I could not orderly deal, before I had first directed the former 
and principal matters. I mean also, if I be permitted, to execute my 
office without abridgement, to fine all others of all kind of sorts that be 
offenders and shall not be executed, and thereby to raise a commodity to 
the Queen's Majesty. And herewith, I trust, that her Majesty will not 
mislike, that with the goods of some persons, where I think fit, I reward 
some that have served, as all others in my place, and like cases have done. 

" I had, before the receipt of the Queen's letters, resolved, with 
Mr. Sadler, not to execute the martial law against any person that had 
inheritance or great wealth ; for that I knew the law in that case." By 
this Sussex means that by the law the property of those executed would 
go to their families, while if their lives were spared, they could be 
stripped of all that they possessed. 

Among the prisoners in Durham Castle (January i, 1570) under Sir 
George Bowes, Knight, Provost-Marshal, we find " John Markenfield, 
brother to Thomas Markenfield, Christopher Norton and Marmaduke 
Norton, younger sons of Richard Norton," and the representatives of 
many of the noblest Catholic names of the North. 

The gentlemen paid 6s. 8</. a week for their " meat and drink," and 
the " meaner sort" 3^. ^d. On January 25, the two Nortons and John 
Markenfield, with others, were sent to York Castle. Some were saved 
from the Queen's vengeance by an appeal to her cupidity. Thus Lord 
Sussex writes that he had ventured to pardon John Sayer, a very youno- 
118 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

man, on consideration of his father paying a fine of five hundred pounds 
if the Queen's Majesty be so pleased : which if he be executed she 
should have nothing. 

Meanwhile Lord Warwick and the Lord Admiral had arrived on 
the scene, after the rebellion was over, and proceeded, as Sussex bitterly 
complained, to ravage the whole country, making their headquarters at 
Durham. " They have driven all the cattle of the country, and ran- 
somed the people in such miserable sort, and made such open and 
common spoil, as the like, I think, was never heard of. ... Their 
men ride daily about the country, seizing and spoiling and ransacking 
at their pleasure." Worse than this, " the pardon proclaimed by the 
Queen's Majesty's commandment is (to her dishonour and my shame) no 
surety to such as received it." He earnestly begs the Queen to " main- 
tain him in his first authority, allow of his well doings, and defend him 
from defacings without desert. ... If I weighed not the quiet of my 
Queen more than any other matter, I would have stopped them from 
crowing upon my dunghill, or carrying of one halfpenny out of my rule." 
The ruthless directions for wholesale executions are terrible to read. 
At Durham, at Darlington, Richmond, Northallerton, Thirsk, Ripon, 
and in all the towns and villages around, the gibbet was erected in the 
market-place or in the centre of the village street, and soon was loaded 
with its ghastly burden. It was expressly directed that no village should 
escape. In three days in January over three hundred perished in the 
Bishopric. Even the fiercely Protestant Bishop Pilkington was touched 
at the state of his unhappy diocese, and wrote, " The cuntre is in grete 
mysere. . . . The number ofF offenders is so grete, that few innocent 
are left to trie the giltie." The red rain fell thick on every village green, 
and the carrion-crows feasted as they had never done before. 

Meanwhile two anxieties only filled the heart of the virgin-queen, first 
that exemplary punishment should be meted out to "the meaner sort," 
and next that " her charges should be diminished to the utmost compatible 
with safety." It would be difficult to tell whether ferocity or avarice held 
the stronger sway over that virgin heart. 

To do him justice, the Earl of Sussex did his work very systematically. 
He first obtained the approximate number of those who had joined the 
rising from each village, and then settled the number that were to be 
executed there. Thus, for instance, under Richmondshire in Yorkshire, 
we find : 

Joined in Gilling West, 141 To be executed, 30 

Hang East, 241 42 

Hang West, 293 47 

HalHkeld, 341 57 

Gilling East, 225 37 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The comforting intelligence was duly sent to her Majesty, together 
with the Lieutenant's assurances that all that was possible was being done 
to spare the royal pocket. But the Queen was annoyed that the execu- 
tions took so long, and Sussex had to hurry on his Provost-Marshal : " I 
pray you make all the haste you can, to avoid offence, for a little matter 
will stir offence where charge groweth by it." 

Poor Sussex was indeed worried to death by her Majesty's letters. 
Writing again on January 19, he tells Bowes that he has received letters 
from court whereby he perceives " the Queen's Majesty doth much 
marvel that she doth not hear that the execution is yet ended, and that 
she is disburdened of her charges, that was considered for that respect : 
and therefore I heartily pray you to use expedition, for I fear that this 
lingering will breed displeasure to us both. I would have you make the 
examples great in Ripon and Tadcaster, and therefore if you find not 
sufficient numbers within the town that be in the doings of the late 
rebellion, take of other townes and bring them to the execution to those 
places ; for it is necessary that the execution be great in appearance in 
those two places. . . . The like thereof shall be convenient to be done 
at Thirsk." 

The cruelty with which the rebellion was punished was no doubt 
sound policy. As Sir George Bowes, the Provost-Marshal writes : In 
this circuit and journey through the Bishopric, Richmondshire, Allerton- 
shire, Cleveland, Ripon, and Wetherby, " there is of them executed, six 
hundred and odd ; so that now the authors of this rebellion is cursed of 
every side ; and sure the people are in marvellous fear, so that I trust 
that there shall never such things happen in these parts again." And 
indeed they never did. 

To sum it up in Lingard's words, there was not " between Newcastle 
and Wetherby, a district of sixty miles in length and forty in breadth, a 
town or village in which some of the inhabitants did not expire on the 
gibbet." 

But to the great chagrin of the Queen the leaders had escaped her. 
It was now her darling wish to get them once more into her power. 
Norton and Markenfield and the two Earls were all safe in Scotland. 
But the Regent, the crafty Moray, was the Queen's friend, and his 
influence was invoked to compel the half independent clans on the 
border to give up the fugitives. 

The Queen found a spy in a certain Robert Constable, the repre- 
sentative of a noble Catholic family and a relative of the Earl of West- 
moreland, who volunteered to follow the fugitives to Scotland ; where 
he might, "percase, work some feat to betrap some of them." He 
was himself ashamed of his mission, which he declared to be "a 
120 





BLESSED THOMAS PERCY, EARL OF NORTHUMBERLAND 

From a Bartolozzi print in possession of Mgr. Owens. The signature is from 
the answers to his examination before his judges, now in the Public Record Office 

To fare page 120 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

traitorous kind of service that I am waded in, to trap them that trust 
me, as Judas did Christ." But he persevered in it. He found at 
Cavers Mr. Richard Norton, who inquired about his sons William, 
Christopher, and Marmaduke, and rejoiced to hear that they were still 
living. Constable advised him and his son Francis to come to England ; 
but happily they did not trust themselves to his protection. Mr. 
Markenfield, he learned, was at Brauxholm with several other of the 
leaders. 

With the exception of the Blessed Thomas Percy, who, to the 
eternal disgrace of the Regent, was sold to the Queen for a sum of 
2000, the leaders of the Rising succeeded in escaping abroad. 

Old Richard Norton told Constable that he had had to fly for his life 
so suddenly, that he had taken away with him " neither horse, apparel 
nor money, but was glad to ride of a horse of his son's." Francis and 
Sampson, who had escaped with him, " brought neither apparel nor 
money, but were as bare as Job." 

From Scotland, old Norton and his sons managed to get over to 
Flanders, where they obtained a pension from the King of Spain. The 
period of the old man's death is uncertain, but as Sir Cuthbert Sharpe 
remarks, " worn down with age and trouble, it is not probable that he 
was long burdensome on the bounty of the King of Spain." Francis 
did his best to buy his pardon by a full confession, but his humiliating 
disclosure won him no mercy from the implacable Queen. 

On January 16 Elizabeth directed that William and Christopher 
Norton, and Thomas Norton, their uncle, should be sent up to court, 
under separate escort, so that they should have no conference by the 
way together nor with others. This was accordingly done. 

On April 6 they were arraigned at Westminster, and pleaded guilty 
to the charges brought against them. 

Christopher was but a boy, and we do not know why he was 
signalled out for execution, while William and Marmaduke were 
spared, but the probability is that he had no property with which to 
buy his life. 

There is an official account extant of the execution of young Chris- 
topher Norton and his uncle Thomas, who suffered on May 27, 1570. 
They were drawn on a hurdle from the Tower to Tyburn. Being 
pressed by the preacher to acknowledge his offences against God and his 
prince, Thomas Norton answered that for offence made and committed 
toward the Queen's Majesty, he had the law for it, and therefore must 
suffer death, and to that end he was come thither ; and so he only asked 
pardon for his offences against God. He was then requested to say the 
Lord's prayer in the vulgar tongue. " Sir," quoth he, and answered 
Q 121 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

very obstinately, that he would pray in Latin, and therefore prayed him 
that he would not molest his conscience. Another minister bade him, 
if he must needs say it in Latin, to say it then secretly to himself, and 
so he did. His Latin prayers being ended, the preacher exhorted him 
very earnestly to say the Lord's prayer and belief in English. This he 
at last agreed to, and so said the Lord's prayer in English, to which he 
added the Ave Maria. And then he desired not only the audience, but, 
also the saints in heaven to pray for him, both then and at all times. He 
hung a certain space, and then was taken down and quartered in presence 
of his nephew, who presently must drink of the same cup. 

Christopher, poor lad, was not so brave as his uncle. He acknow- 
ledged that he had worthily deserved his death, and therefore besought 
God and all men to forgive him. As the horrible butchery proceeded, 
he cried out in his agony, " c Oh, Lord, Lord, have mercy upon me ! ' 
and so he yielded up the ghost." 

Let us pray that he found that mercy with God, which he had sought 
in vain from man. Sanders speaks of him and his uncle as suffering " a 
noble martyrdom" ; and it is certain that they died in the cause of the 
Catholic religion. 

The Lord of Markenfield, after spending some time under the protec- 
tion of Lord Hume at Hume Castle, fled, like his kinsman and friend, to 
Flanders, to linger out the rest of his days, a ruined and a broken man. 
His wife, Isabel, daughter of Sir William Ingleby of Ripley Castle, and 
sister of the martyr, Venerable Francis Ingleby, was allowed a small pen- 
sion for life, out of her husband's confiscated estates. We find from time 
to time mention made of Thomas Markenfield in the reports of Govern- 
ment spies. Thus in October, 1571," Markenfeld is said to be gone 
to Spain or Rome, and there is one Dr. Morton, that was said was 
coming from the Pope with letters and money to the English now at 
Louvain." A letter addressed to Markenfield at Madrid, dated from 
Tournay, May 19, 1593, from a cousin, states that he has received his 
letter from Portugal, "written upon the back of a target," and that he 
was glad to hear from him, as he had been reported dead. The writer 
adds, " Your wife is poor, but prayeth hard for you. I fear she is in 
great lack of worldly comforts." 

We hear, from the reports of spies, picturesque details as to the life 
of the exiles at Louvain. " Those who were at Louvain for religion 
before the rebels came used not to come in their company." A spy saw 
" Sir Francis Englefield refuse to meet or speak with the Earl of West- 
moreland in the street, whereat the Earl was much offended ; but every 
Thursday all the English in Louvain went to church to hear Mass and 
pray for England. Many persons were continually coming from England 
122 




THE ARMS OF BLESSED THOMAS PERCY 

From his Book of Prayers, written and illuminated with 
his own hand. Now in the possession of the 'Duke of 
Northumberland 



To face page 122 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

into Flanders." Coming towards England, one Henry Simpsonj 
whose report we quote, " met a wagon with fourteen men, women and 
children from Oxfordshire, their servants walking on foot with sky- 
coloured cloaks laid on with green lace." Mr. Markenfield had a cook 
called Francis, who spoke French, and who remained in Paris in order to 
get the news from England (October 21, 1571). 

Thomas Markenfield is finally mentioned in a book called the Estate 
of English Fugitives as one of " those that are only for want of things 
necessary, and of pure poverty consumed and dead." His younger 
brother, John, a boy of nineteen, was unjustly attainted at York, and 
narrowly escaped execution. The Commissioners report that " he is 
very young, under twenty, and was attainted only to bring his title to his 
brother's lands (if he have any) to the Queen ; and it was not meant 
he should die, for that he hath no land, and is within the compass of 
the commission for compounding." 

Of another reprieved prisoner, Henry Johnson, the Commission 
reports : " He is very simple, was abused [i.e. perverted] by his wife, 
who is Norton's daughter, and he hath made a state [i.e. settlement] of 
his lands to her at the time of his marriage ; so as by his life the 
Queen shall have his lands, and by his death his wife shall presently 
have them according to the state." The same was reported of other 
prisoners, e.g. " so the Queen shall win by his life ana lose by his death." 
In reply the Queen, after remarking that she had " always been more 
inclinable to mercy than to severity," doubted whether since such a 
great number of the poorer sort of people had been executed, it would 
not seem " an inordinate compassion to have no greater example upon 
the richer than upon the four only " already executed. " We are pleased 
that Henry Johnson for his simplicity, and John Markenfield for his 
youth . . . shall be forborne from execution. As for the other four 
... we are in nothing moved to spare them, for any respect of the profit 
that might come to us by their life " ; however, she left it to the 
judgment of the Commission. 

It only remains to learn the fate of Markenfield Hall. The Com- 
missioners who were surveying the confiscated property of the insurgent 
leaders write as follows to Cecil (April 21, 1570) : 

"We are now at Ripon, surveying Richard Norton and Thomas 
Markenfield's lands. Norton has a brick house, which looks fair, but 
is all out of order within. It is well placed, with apt grounds for 
garden and orchards, wherein he had pleasure ; within half a mile of 
his house, he has a park of i^- miles, well stored with timber. It has 
been stored with deer and conies, which are now almost spoiled. Of 
his demesnes, part is good ground lying about the river Ure, but the 

123 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

grounds on the river are not so good as those by the rivers in the 
south. His demesnes are about 650 acres." 

" As Norton's house lies two miles from Ripon, N.E., Mr. Marken- 
field's is one [sic] mile S.W. An ancient house, built all of stone, to the 
outward show fair and stately ; the hall and the lodging side embattled, 
more in length than breadth, and three sides environed with an evil 
moat ; but the house is served with a conduit very plentifully. Against 
the entry of the court is built the hall and kitchen, on the right hand of 
the court the lodgings, and the left the stables, brewhouses, and offices. 
The hall and lodgings are all vaults and were at first built all about one 
high room. Besides the vaults the walls are of a great height, without 
order, whereof part is divided at the mid-transom of the window, so that 
the rooms are all out of order. The house is placed in a park of the 
like quality with Mr. Norton's, but better ground, and well planted with 
large timber. There is a demesne adjoining of 800 acres, with no quantity 
of water meadow, but much hay is made in seasonable years." 

Before we finish our story let us go for a moment into Ripon Minster 
and look at the magnificent tomb of Sir Thomas de Markenfield and 
Dionisia, his wife, which forms one of the glories of the ancient church. 
It lies in what was once the Chapel of St. Andrew, in the north transept 
of the cathedral. Sir Thomas is clad in armour of the time of Edward III., 
and when he was alive the famous hall was in all the freshness of its 
beauty, if indeed he did not see it building. Round his neck is a collar 
composed of park palings with a hart lodged within it, which according 
to Planche is the special badge of the town of Derby. The hands of 
the warrior are folded in prayer, his sword in its richly ornamented 
scabbard lies by his side, and his feet rest upon a lion guardant. Upon 
the tomb and upon the hilt of the sword are sculptured the Markenfield 
arms argent, on a bend sable three bezants. The sides and west end of 
the tomb are panelled and bear shields, among which we may still detect 
the famous saltire of the Nevilles. 

This knightly effigy is surely a fitting representation of the lord of 
such a house as Markenfield. 

Another Sir Thomas lies by the north wall of the transept, beside 
Eleanor, his wife. Both effigies are greatly disfigured and mutilated. 
They are of the time of Henry- VII., and this Sir Thomas was prob- 
ably the great-grandfather of the last lord of Markenfield Hall. Of 
Sir Ninian, who fought and bled at Flodden Field, no monument 
remains. It is said that the family became extinct in the male line at 
the beginning of the nineteenth century, in the person of Metcalf 
Markenfield, who died at Slingsby, January 2, 1808, aged ninety-three. 
But this is not certain. On one of our visits to Markenfield Hall, we 
124 




TOMB OF SIR THOMAS MARKENFIELD 
AND DIONISIA HIS WIFE, RIPON MINSTER 
Photo by the author 




TOMB OF SIR THOMAS MARKENFIELD 
AND ELEANOR HIS WIFE, RIPON MINSTER 

Photo by the author 



To face page 124 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

were told that the name still exists, if not in England, at least in 
America, and that in recent years one who claimed to be a descendant 
of the ancient family whose name he bears had come across the Atlantic 
to visit the home of his ancestors. 

What could be more striking to the imagination than the contrast 
between this feudal house, hidden away in its fallen majesty, forgotten 
as it were by time itself, and the stirring life of the great republic of the 
West, in which perhaps the last scion of its ancient lords lives and moves ! 

The glory of Markenfield has departed, and its name is long for- 
gotten. The vast demesnes of its last lord were granted to Sir Henry 
Gates of Seamer in Yorkshire, as a reward for his efforts in putting 
down the Rising. 

And with the passing away of the Percies and the Nevilles, the 
Nortons and the Markenfields, it must have seemed indeed to the men 
of the North country that the old order had departed for ever. In a 
sense this was true. The last remnant of the great feudal nobility had 
been ruthlessly destroyed. The times were changed indeed, and England 
was no longer the Merry England of old. Could it be that the ancient 
religion now proscribed and persecuted, was also to pass away ? It may 
have seemed so to some of little faith. And yet we know that the old 
religion which flourished when Markenfield was in its prime was not 
and could not be extinguished with the ruin of its noble house ; rather 
in its imperishable strength it has thrown out new roots across the very 
ocean, and men come from a land unknown and undreamed of to the 
builders of Markenfield, to muse over the fallen splendours of the 
place, with the same zeal burning in their souls which drove Thomas 
Markenfield forth from his home to strike a blow for God, our Lady, 
and the Catholic Faith ! 

Transit gloria mundi^ fides Catholica manet (" The glory of the world 
passeth away, but the Catholic faith remains ") is a motto inscribed upon 
the walls of another ancient Manor House, and it might be well written 
over the gateway of Markenfield Hall. The cause seemed lost indeed 
for a while, but God's cause can never fail, and the blood of the faithful 
North has born its seed in due season. 

In conclusion we may quote some verses of " Claxton's Lament," 
a contemporary poem which describes the fate of Robert Claxton, of 
Old-Park County, Durham, who was engaged in the Rising. It might 
have been written equally well of the Markenfields : 

" Listen, English merchants brave, 
' To Robert Claxton, woeful man ! 
Who once had lands and livings fair, 
Most like an English gentleman. 

125 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

" But the flower is shed and the spring is fled, 

And he wanders alone at the close of the day ; 
And the sleety hail in the moonshine pale, 
Glistens at eve on his locks of grey. 

" To Wetherby the Earls are gone ; 

A message came, so fair and free 
' Now swear thee, on the holy rood, 
I charge thee, Claxton, ride with me.' 



" ' We only stand to guard our own, 

Our lives are set in jeopardy 
And if thou wilt not ride with us 
Yet shall thy lands forfaulted be. 

" ' Now, foul befall the venomed tongues 

That slandered two such noble peers ; 
And brought such woe and misery 
On silver hairs and failing years. 

" ' To Wetherby I needs must ride 
No better chance since I may see : 
My eldest son is full of pride ; 
My second goes for love of me. 

" ' Now bide at home, my eldest son ; 

Thou art the heir of all my land.' 
' If I stay at home for land or fee 

May I be branded in forehead and hand. 

" ' The Percies are rising in the north ; 

The Nevilles are gathering in the west; 
And Claxton's heir may bide at home 
And hide him in the cushat's nest ?' 

" ' Now rest at home, my youngest son, 

Thy limbs are lithe, thy age is green,' 
'Nay, father, we'll to Wetherby, 
And never more at home be seen. 

" 'We'll keep our bond to our noble Lord, 

We'll tine our faith to the Southern Queen 
And when all is lost, we'll cross the seas, 
And bid farewell to bower and green. 

" ' Our towers may stand till down they fall, 

That's all the help they'll get from me ; 
False Southrons will be lords of all, 

But we'll ne'er hear it o'er the sea.' 
126 



MARKENFIELD HALL 

" Now the Percies' crescent is set in blood ; 

And the northern bull his flight has ta'en ; 
And the sheaf of arrows are keen and bright 
And Barnard's walls are hard to gain. 

" The sun shout bright, and the birds sung sweet 

The day tee left the North Court trie ; 

But cold is the wind, and sharp is the sleet, 

That teat on the exile over the sea." 



I2 7 



RIPLEY CASTLE AND ITS MARTYRED SON 

IN the valley of the Nidd, that most picturesque of Yorkshire rivers 
which flows between its lofty cliffs of limestone by St. Robert of 
Knaresborough's Hermitage, and that gloomy castle where the 
murderers of St. Thomas of Canterbury " dreed their weird " for 
twelve long months after the sacrilegious crime, there rises a wooded 
hill, upon which stands a tiny village, clustering round its fourteenth- 
century church and the castle of its lords. 

Ripley is situated about four miles from Knaresborough and a little 
less from the well-known Spa of Harrogate, in the midst of a country 
full of Catholic memories. As you mount the hill from Nidd bridge 
you come first to the village, and a charming village it is. The mediaeval 
Ripley has indeed disappeared, for the old town was pulled down and a 
new one built on a different site by Sir Wm. Ingilby in 1827. The old 
pre-Reformation market-cross, consisting of a plain shaft resting on five 
well-worn tiers, still occupies an open space in the midst ot the present 
village ; and beside it stand the now long-disused parish-stocks. An 
ancient priests' house with a chantry chapel, which once occupied this 
spot, has also disappeared, together with the mediaeval town. 

Though the archaeologist has reason to regret the result of this act 
of benevolent despotism, it must be confessed that the model village it 
created is a very pretty one. Nor do I imagine that the people of 
Ripley have any complaints to make. For Ripley belongs to its Lords, the 
Inglebys, as it has done for the past five hundred years, and the old feudal 
relations that have existed all these centuries are very strong and close. 

The beautiful little church is full of Ingleby monuments, the "estoile 
argent " of the family is seen everywhere, and the village seems to exist 
but for the splendid castle in which the Inglebys have dwelt since the days 
of Edward III. 

Let us first enter the church, as is but right. It stands just opposite 
the castle gate-house, a typical English parish church, of the Decorated 
or Edwardine period of Gothic architecture, embowered in a God's acre 
full of magnificent trees. It is dedicated to All Saints. On the north 
side of this churchyard is a very curious ancient cross, of unknown 
antiquity. It is mutilated indeed, like most of these ancient Catholic 
memorials in Protestant England, but what is left of it is unusually 
interesting. The circular base is 2 feet high and 1 5^- feet in circumference, 
and in it there are indented eight deep hollows, apparently meant for 
those who might wish to kneel in prayer around the symbol of salvation. 
It is called a Penitents' or Weeping Cross,* and is, of its kind, unique in 

* See facing p. 146. 
128 




TOMB OF SIR THOMAS INGLEBY 

Photo by the author Tafacc pa^c 128 



RIPLEY CASTLE AND ITS MARTYRED SON 

England. It probably dates from the fifteenth century, but this is not 
certain. It is thought that the upper stone (33 inches in diameter and 
28|- inches high) supported a rood of wood. 

Other curious relics of great antiquity, such as stone-coffins and 
sculptured tomb-slabs, lie by the walls of the church, memorials, it would 
seem, of an earlier building which once stood lower down upon the river 
bank. 

Within we find a quaint old rood screen of black oak, which, however 
(at the restoration of 1862), has been removed from its proper place, cut 
short, and re-erected in the south chapel. So few screens remain in this 
part of Yorkshire, that this has all the interest of a precious relic. But 
the interior of the church gains most of its charm from the Ingleby chapel 
and monuments. The members of this family, though staunchly Catholics 
throughout the fiercest days of the persecution, were laid to rest within 
the walls of the desecrated sanctuary which in life they never entered. 
The reason of this, of course, was that in the penal days Catholics could 
not be buried anywhere else, for Popish chapels and cemeteries were alike 
proscribed by law. 

And thus the silver star of the family gleams out from the monuments 
not merely of the Inglebys of Catholic days, such as that of Sir Thomas 
and Edeline, his wife, of the time of King Edward III., but from many a 
slab to the memory of men who lived and suffered, in the darkest days, 
" for God, our Lady, and the Catholic Faith." * 

It is, indeed, sad for the pilgrim to find that the ancient faith is no 
longer the heritage of those who now bear this ancient name. For that 
name can never be anything but dear to those who love the memories of 
the past, and who also reflect that the family has been made for ever 
illustrious by giving one of its sons to the white-robed army of martyrs 
who witnessed to that faith with their blood. And it is with the 

* This Sir Thomas was the first Ingleby of Ripley, having married the heiress, Lady 
Edeline de Ripley, about 1330. He was a judge of the King's Bench from 1361-77, 
when presumably he died. His tomb "is one of the most perfectly fashioned types of the 
camail period of the time of Edward III. extant. The Lady Edeline appears on the right 
of her husband to indicate her prerogative as heiress. This altar-tomb of wrought lime- 
stone is said to have been brought from the older church about A.D. 1400." (SPEIGHT, 
NMerda/e.) Mr. John Foster, who is descended from the Inglebys, and is a great authority 
on their history, informs me that in his opinion Speight is mistaken here, and that the 
Lady Edeline belonged to the Thwenge family. The arms on the tomb impaled with 
those of Ingleby (and also on an illuminated pedigree in possession of Sir Henry Ingilby) 
are of Thwenge, viz., or, afess between three popinjays vert. He thinks Sir Thomas Ingleby 
got Ripley in some way from the Crown, for Knaresboro' and all the neighbourhood then 
belonged to the Crown. Originally Ripley was probably a sort of fortified Peel Tower, 
and Padside Hall was the family residence. In time of war the family migrated to the 
shelter of Ripley. 

R 129 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

invocation of the Venerable Francis Ingleby in our hearts and on our 
lips that we stand to gaze at the fair picture presented by his ancient 
home. 

Looking from the north, we see on our left the castle, belted round 
by its park, mirrored in the waters of the stream, which here widens out 
into a lake. A little to the right stands the gate-house, a fine specimen 
of its class, still untouched by the vandal hand of the restorer, just as it 
was when the future martyr passed in and out of it. 

The gate-house opens on to a private road which divides it from the 
churchyard, and which, skirting the old wall of the park, runs down the 
hill towards the water. Beyond the gate-house we see the church-tower 
rising from its bower of trees, and still further to the right, a large old- 
fashioned house, the vicarage. The whole picture is a charming one, 
such as, indeed, can hardly be seen elsewhere than in England. It is 
the old mediaeval picture, the village, the castle, and the church, where 
our Catholic forefathers worshipped God, side by side, peasant and knight 
together ; and it embodies to the understanding eye a long story of 
chivalrous deeds and simple pastoral life, carrying us back to the good 
old days when England was merry because she was Catholic. 

But to the pilgrim, Ripley Castle has a far higher, deeper interest ; to 
him it is a shrine. And hither one afternoon on a bright August day, 
the writer made his way to glean what he could of the life of the martyr 
of Ripley from the stones of his ancient home. He was hospitably and 
kindly received by those who now bear the ancient name, and the first 
thing that he was shown was the martyr's portrait, hanging over the 
fireplace in the Castle library. This portrait was discovered not many 
years ago in some lumber-room of the Castle, whither no doubt it had been 
relegated when the Inglebys lost the faith for which their ancestors had 
died. But now it has been brought to light again, and hung in its place 
of honour. It is a small painting on panel, and has never before been 
reproduced. We owe it to the kindness of Sir Henry Ingilby, the present 
Baronet, that we are able to show it to our readers, for it has been 
photographed expressly for this purpose. Curiously enough, the picture, 
as it is now hung, has a pendant, and that is the portrait of the Queen who 
sent Francis Ingleby to his death ! 

We found that little was known of the martyr's life at Ripley Castle, 
and it was even supposed that he had committed the crime for which 
he nominally suffered that of high treason. This account, therefore, 
of his life and martyrdom was compiled in the first place for the 
martyr's family, that they might honour him as he deserves. But here 
we venture to lay it before a wider circle, that God may be glorified 
yet more in His saints. 
130 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

But before we close this introduction, we may add a few details as to 
the Castle and the family history. 

The illustration gives a good idea of the former. The fine old gate- 
house dates from the middle of the fifteenth century. Over the archway 
are sculptured the arms of Ingleby impaled with those of Strangeways. 
This fixes the date, for John Ingleby, who married Margaret, a daughter 
of that knightly house, was born in 1434 and died in 1457. 

The present Castle is of later date, and has been sadly modernised. 
When Pennant visited it in 1773 it was still unchanged. He describes 
it as partly a tower embattled, but " a more ancient house still remains 
of wood and plaster, and solid wooden stairs. The entrance to this 
house is through a porch, the descent into it by three steps ; the hall is 
large and lofty, has its bow windows, its elevated upper table, and its table 
for vassals, and is floored with brick." Not long after this all these ancient 
features disappeared. The massive tower at the angle of the building, 
which is shown so prominently in the drawing is the least altered 
part. It dates from 1555. It was, in fact, built by Sir William 
Ingleby, our martyr's father, at this time, as we learn from an inscription 
carved on the frieze of the panelling of the " Knight's Chamber," which 
is the principal feature of the interior of the tower, and is approached by 
a staircase in the turret. This inscription runs : " In the year of our 
Ld. M.D.L.V. was this house buylded by Sir Wyllyam Inglbi, Knight, 
Phelip and Marie reigning that time." 

This upper chamber is a fine room, as the drawing shows, and the 
only one in the Castle which has maintained its ancient appearance. Here 
are preserved some very precious manuscripts, many of which were saved 
by the Ingleby of the day from the wreck of Fountains Abbey. This 
famous Cistercian House of " Our Lady of the Fountains" is situated 
only some five miles away, as the crow flies. Thus the Inglebys had good 
opportunities of saving these grand old illuminated books, opportunities 
which they, fervent Catholics as they were, were not slow to use. The 
writer spent a very happy hour among these treasures, which were 
kindly laid out for his inspection by his host. There is also a fine collection 
of ancient armour and various weapons, and a valuable collection of gold 
and silver coins and medals. 

The park and gardens of the Castle are exceedingly pretty and well 

" In another place the following quaint carving occurs : 

" Better ys povertie with mirthe and gladness 

Than ys riches with soro and sadness. 

I.H.C. I.H.C. be our spedc . Amen . Mon Droit. made by me 
Sir Willyam Ingilby Kt. in the second yeare of our Sovereign 
Lord Kynge Edward, 1548. I.H.C., Keep, keep the Founder." 
I 3 2 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

laid out. During the summer months the gardens are kindly thrown 
open to the public, and visitors to Harrogate are not slow to avail 
themselves of the privilege. The Castle, however, is not shown. 

The family was one of the most faithful of Yorkshire, and was allied 
with many of the chief knightly families of that Catholic shire. Thus the 
Inglebys of Ripley were closely related to their near neighbours, the 
Mallorys of Studley Royal, the Nortons of Norton Conyers, the 
Markenfields of Markenfield, the Brimhams of Knaresborough, the 
Yorkes of Goulthwayt, the Plumptons of Plumpton, the Vavasours or 
Newton Hall, all famous for their devotion to the ancient faith in the 
midst of persecution. If they have now lost that faith, it is some com- 
pensation that their neighbours, the Radcliffes of Rudding, have happily 
regained it, while the late Catholic Marquis of Ripon, the Lord of Studley 
Royal, was a direct descendant of the Mallory who defended the faith in 
the days of the sixth Edward. The hamlet of Bishop Thornton, close to 
Ripley, is still a stronghold of the old religion, which has never died out 
there. The Trappes of Nidd Hall, and the Slingsbys of Scriven, close to 
Knaresborough, were also staunchly Catholic ; so that here, if anywhere 
in England, the pilgrim finds the very air laden with historic memories 
of his faith.* 

Our martyr's great-grandfather, John Ingleby, of Ripley, died in 
1502. His wife was Elinor, daughter of Sir Marmaduke Constable of 
Everingham, another grand old family of Yorkshire Catholics. Their 
son, William Ingleby, married Cecily, daughter and heiress of Sir George 
Talboys of Kyme, and their son, our martyr's father, Sir William Ingleby, 
married Anne, daughter of Sir William Mallory of Studley Royal. Sir 
William Ingleby died in 1578 or 1579 (he was buried at Ripley) 
leaving a large family of five sons and eight daughters. His will is 
dated from " Padsidehead " in the Forest, a homestead apparently as 
commodious as the Castle itself. His interment in Ripley Church must 
have been a memorable event in the Dale. He left ^23 6s. %>d. (equal 
to about /,2oo of our money) for the " charges of the funerall dinner." 
His portrait is still preserved in the Castle. He is clothed in the armour 
of the period, with neck-rufF and mail collar, and epaulieres with 
ornamental edge which nearly meet across the cuirass. 

To show that our martyr came -of good Catholic stock on either side 

* A recent historian of Nidderdale (Mr. H. Speight, to whose industry I owe many 
details of topographical interest) writes : " In the reign of Elizabeth there was probably 
hardly a family in this neighbourhood that was not Roman Catholic at heart. In 1604 
there were at least one hundred persons declared Recusants in the three neighbouring 
parishes of Farnham with Scotton, Nidd, and Ripley. No part of Yorkshire was more 
rampant with Romanism." 



RIPLEY CASTLE AND ITS MARTYRED SON 

we may quote a story, told in the Chronicle Oj St. Monica's, Louvain, 
of his maternal grandfather : 

"This Sir William Mallory was so zealous and constant a Catholic 
that when heresy first came into England, and Catholic service com- 
manded to be put down on such a day, he came to the church, and 
stood there at the door with his sword drawn to defend, that none should 
come in to abolish religion, saying that he would defend it with his life, 
and continued for some days keeping out the officers as long as he 
possibly could do it." This must have been in the time of Edward VI. 
when the ancient services were abolished, and the First Book of Common 
Prayer substituted for them, in the year 1549. The church the good 
knight so stoutly defended was no doubt the old chapel at Aldfield near 
Studley Royal. This chapel has been replaced by a splendid modern 
church, built by Lady Ripon, which forms a prominent feature of the 
landscape, at the end of a long avenue in the park of Studley Royal. 

The spirit of Sir William Mallory lived long in his descendants. In 
the same Chronicle a very similar story is told of Sir William Babthorpe, 
the great-grandson of his daughter Ann, Lady Ingleby. 

" He came at length into great trouble for his zeal in defence of 
religion, by reason that having two priests found in his house, he would 
have agreed with the pursuivants for money to let them go, but when 
he saw that by no fair means they would do it, he determined by force to 
rescue them out of their hands. Therefore, being a tall, strong man, he 
made no more ado, but drew out his sword, and made the priests to 
depart away, keeping the pursuivants the while in such fear with his 
naked sword that none of them durst resist him. But afterwards they 
complained to the Justice, and it was esteemed a great contempt so to 
resist these vile officers, wherefore he was fined to pay such a sum of 
money as brought him to great poverty, besides imprisonment almost a 
whole year." 

But to return to Sir William Ingleby and his children. 

The eldest son, also Sir William, died without surviving issue, 
although he married twice, his two wives being both heiresses, the first, 
Anne Thwaites of Marston, who died in 1570 ; the second, Catherine 
Smythe or Smethley of Brantingham. He was buried at Ripley, 
January 25, 1617-18, and his second wife survived him only ten months. 
The second son, David, married Anne, daughter of Charles Neville, 
Earl of Westmoreland, the leader (with Blessed Thomas Percy, Earl 
of Northumberland) of the second Pilgrimage of Grace, the famous 
Northern Rising of 1569. We have already told the story of their 
fate in the account of Markenfield Hall. David Ingleby had three 
daughters, Mary, Frances, and Ursula. The third son was John, who 

135 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

died in infancy ; the fourth, Francis, our martyr, who, as it is quaintly 
put in Bethatns Baronetage, " died young." The fifth was Sampson, 
who married Jane, the daughter of Mr. Lambert of Killinghall, and 
whose son William (born in 1594 at Spofforth Castle) was heir to his 
uncle, Sir William. Sampson Ingleby became steward of the Yorkshire 
estates of Henry, ninth Earl of Northumberland in succession to 
Thomas Percy, the Gunpowder Plot conspirator. He lived in this 
capacity, for some years, at Spofforth Castle, the ancient home of the 
Percies, whose splendid ruins may still be visited, close to the railway 
line between Harrogate and Wetherby. He is said to have been a very 
trusty man, and his portrait still hangs on the wall of Ripley Castle. He 
died July 18, 1604, and his widow was presented as a Recusant by the 
minister and churchwardens of Spofforth parish in the same year. 
Sampson Ingleby left besides his son, five daughters, Anne, Catherine, 
Mary, Jane and Elizabeth ; the last named became a Franciscan nun at 
the English monastery at Brussels, the community which is now flourish- 
ing at Taunton. All these daughters of Sampson Ingleby were good 
Catholics, but I fear that their brother Sir William (who was created a 
baronet in 1642 and died in 1657-8) must have given up his faith and 
conformed to the new religion. 

But to return to the martyr's own family. 

His next brother was John, the fifth son of Sir William, who married 
Catherine, daughter of Sir William Babthorpe of Babthorpe and Osgodby, 
and relict of George Vavasour of Spaldington, Esquire. The Vavasours 
and Babthorpes are among the most famous of Yorkshire families, and 
were always staunch Recusants. 

Jane, our martyr's eldest sister, married George Wyntour, second son 
of Robert Wyntour of Coldwell and Huddington, County Worcester. 
This is noteworthy, for it throws a light on a tragic episode of English 
history. 

Jane Ingleby, by this marriage became the mother of two sons, Robert 
and Thomas Wyntour, well known for their share in the Gunpowder Plot. 
A Protestant writer,* who has lately written the sad history of these 
Wyntours of Huddington, most truly remarks : "Great was their crime, 
monstrous in its conception, and mad in its development. But equally 
criminal was the Government, which denied to its subjects liberty of con- 
science and freedom of religious worship " ; and he reminds us that the 
story of the sufferings and martyrdom of Francis Ingleby, their uncle, 
was doubtless learned by the Wyntour brothers at their mother's knee, 
making a deep and lasting impression upon their young minds. Jane 

Mr. John Humphreys, F.L.S., The Wyntours of Huddington and the Gunpowder Plot. 
{Transactions of the Birmingham Archaeological Society, 1905.) 
136 







SIR THOMAS AND DAME EDELINE INGLEBY 
rtV tomb In Ripley Church. Photo by the author 




THE TOMB OF SIR THOMAS AND DAME EDELINE 

FROM THE SOUTH. Photo by the author To face page 



RIPLEY CASTLE AND ITS MARTYRED SON 

Ingleby, happily, did not live to see the tragic fate of her sons, and that 
of John Grant, the husband of her daughter Dorothy, who was also one 
of the conspirators. 

The next sisters of the martyr were Dorothy, Susanna and Isabel, the 
last named married Thomas Markenfield of Markenfield Hall, son and 
heir of Thomas Markenfield, one of the principal supporters of Charles, 
Earl of Westmoreland, in the Crusade of 1569. The grand old Gothic 
Hall of the Markenfields was built, as we have said, about 1310 and 
added to in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Francis Ingleby must 
often have visited it ; he prayed doubtless in its exquisite Gothic Chapel ; 
though he was but a boy of twelve when, after the failure of the Rising, 
the Markenfields had to fly for their lives, and their ancestral estates were 
forfeited to the crown. 

Francis had four other sisters, Elizabeth, wife of Peter Yorke of 
Goulthwaite, eldest son of Sir John Yorke ; Katharine, wife of William 
Arthington of Arthington (who was presented for recusancy by the parish 
of Dacre Pasture in 1604), Frances, and Grace, wife of W T illiam Byrnand 
of Knaresborough, who became mother of one noble daughter, Grace, 
Lady Babthorpe, of whom we shall hear more. 

The Yorkes, the Byrnands and the Arthingtons were among the 
noblest families of the West Riding of Yorkshire. They were all 
staunch to the old faith. 

It only remains to give the ancient arms of the Ingleby family, before 
we proceed to recount what is known of the life of its most illustrious 
scion. They are thus given by Glover (Yorkshire Visitations, 1612). 
Arms: Quarterly, i. Sable, an estoile argent, Ingleby of Ripley. 
2. Gules, a lion rampant argent, within a border engrailed or, Mowbray 
de Colton. 3. Argent, a fesse crenelle between three falcons' 1 heads erased 
sable, beaked or, Chaumont de Colton, and 4. Argent, a chevron 
between three lions' heads erased gules, Rocliff de RoclifF. 

Crest : A boar 3 head, couped erect argent, armed or. Motto, Mon 
droit* 

For those who are uninitiated in the fascinating mysteries of heraldry, 
a word of explanation may be useful. 

The Ingleby arms are those first named ; they show a six-pointed 
silver star upon a black field. By marriage with heiresses they have be- 
come entitled to quarter these arms with those of the other three families 
mentioned, i.e. to divide their shield into four divisions, their own arms 
taking the place of honour in the top left hand (dexter) corner. So 
that the whole shield shows in the first quarter the silver star of the 

* Legend says that the crest was granted to the family by one of the Edwards, whose 
life was saved by an Ingleby from the tusks of a wild boar. 

S 137 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Inglebys ; in the second, the silver lion of the Mowbrays, rampant on a red 
field, within a border engrailed of gold ; in the third, the three black falcons' 
heads, with golden beaks, of the Chaumonts, separated by a horizontal 
battlemented bar, which makes a black line across the silver shield, and 
lastly the three red lions' heads of the RoclifFs, separated by a red chev- 
ron (which is a figure in the shape of the letter V inverted), so that one 
of the lions' heads is in the lower part of the field below the chevron, 
and the other two in the corners above it. 

The crest, which surmounted the knightly helmet of the Lord of 
Ripley, was a silver boar's head, upright, with golden tusks. 

We have said that it appears that Sir William, the first baronet, son 
of Sampson Ingleby, was the first of his family to conform. W r e are not 
sure of this, but from this date the Inglebys made no more Catholic 
alliances. Their kinsmen, the Inglebys of Lawkland Hall, retained the 
faith until the beginning of the nineteenth century. The legitimate 
succession of the Inglebys of Ripley failed in 1772 at the death of the 
fourth baronet. Curiously enough there have been two new creations 
of the baronetcy, in 1781, and again in 1866. The family now spell 
their name Ingilby, as, indeed, they often did from the beginning. 

So much by way of introduction to the life of the martyr of Ripley 
Castle. 

The venerable Servant of God, Francis Ingleby, was the fourth son 
of Sir William Ingleby, of Ripley, County York, Knight, treasurer of 
Berwick, and Dame Anne, his wife, daughter of Sir William Mallory of 
Studley, Knight. He was born in 1557, the last year of Queen Mary 
the Catholic, only two years after his father had rebuilt his ancient home. 
Thus his birth almost synchronised with the change of religion, which 
was to bring such grievous suffering to his family, and gain for him the 
martyr's crown. 

He at first studied law in London. Father William W T arford, S.J., 
writes : " I saw him in 1582, when he had made a good start in his pro- 
fession, and heard him commenting with great discretion, but very 
fluently, on the frauds practised by the Earl of Leicester in perverting 
the laws of the country." 

But he resolved that he could serve God better as a priest, and he 
therefore left his profession, and went over seas to the English seminary 
established at Rheims, where he studied theology and prepared himself 
for the perilous duties of a missionary priest in England. He arrived at 
the English College, August 18, 1582. 

He received the subdiaconate at Laon, May 15, the diaconate at 
Rheims, from the hands of the Cardinal de Guise, September 24, and on 
December 24, 1583, he was ordained priest in the grand old cathedral 
138 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

that surmounts the hill at Laon. He said his first Mass on Christmas 
Day. On April 5, 1584, he left Rheims on his return to England. 
His short missionary career was spent in the North, principally if 
not entirely in his own county. Though the persecution of Catholics 
was then at its height, yet in the worst of times his labours are said to 
have borne great fruit. 

Among his chief friends and supporters was the saintly Margaret 
Clitherowe, who, at the risk of her life, sheltered him in her own house 
in the Shambles at York, and provided him with all that was necessary 
for fulfilling his sacred office. 

In 1585 the cruel and sanguinary law was passed by which it was 
made high treason for any Englishman, made priest by the authority 
of Rome since the first year of Elizabeth, to return into the kingdom or 
remain there ; and felcny for any person to harbour or relieve any such 
priest. By these statutes it was only necessary to prove that a man was 
a Catholic priest, in order to condemn him to the most cruel and 
shameful death ; and many were the victims who were sacrificed under 
these unjust laws. When these laws came into force, a priest (perhaps 
Mr. Ingleby himself) who had frequently said Holy Mass in Mrs. 
Clitherowe's house, came to warn her of the risk she was running in 
relieving priests. But she, being filled with the desire for martyrdom, 
was greatly rejoiced at the news, and said, " By God's grace all priests 
shall be more welcome to me than ever they were, and I will do what I 
can to set forward God's Catholic service." 

On March 10, 1586, in the beginning of Lent, the sheriffs of York 
came to search her house. They whipped a little boy until he showed 
them the priest's chamber, and the hiding-place where she concealed the 
church vestments, Catholic books and other treasures. These they 
carried off, but they could not find Mr. Ingleby. 

Margaret Clitherowe was committed to prison, and on the feast of 
the Annunciation, March 25, 1586 (which was also Good Friday), she 
suffered a most cruel and barbarous martyrdom, being pressed to death 
in the Tollbooth on Ousebridge, at York, for having harboured Mr. 
Francis Ingleby and another priest, Mr. John Mush. 

They stripped her and laid her on the ground, tying her hands 
(outstretched in the form of a cross) to two stakes. They then put upon 
her a door, and on that heaped stones to the weight of five or six 
hundredweight. She was a quarter of an hour in dying, and in the very 
pangs of death she cried : " Jesu, Jesu, help me. Blessed Jesu, I suffer 
this for Thy sake," and so in terrible agony she yielded up her blessed 
soul to God. One of her hands is kept as a relic at St. Mary's Convent, 
York, to this day. 
140 



:Tain Tnems 

9T M f/abiit.ei ;-f-rssit. snr'jc nivuca 
mea, et -^leni* i 

X\ ILMaruc ad "fsj 

j 




VENERAHLE MARGARET CLITHEROWE 



T.I face t a*.' i to 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Francis Ingleby, for whom this heroic woman had gladly given her 
life, did not, however, escape long, if indeed he had not already been 
taken before her martyrdom on March 25. The manner of his 
apprehension is related by two contemporary writers. 

" On a certain day he left York on foot in the dress of a poor man, 
without a cloak, and was courteously accompanied beyond the gates by a 
certain Catholic of that city, named Mr. Lassie (Lacy). The gentleman, 
though intending to return at once, stayed for a few moments' conversa- 
tion with the priest on an open spot, called Bishopsfields, which, unknown 
to the priest, was overlooked by the window of the Archbishop's palace 
of Bishopthorpe. It happened that two chaplains of the Archbishop, 
idly talking there, espied them and noticed that the Catholic, as he was 
taking leave, frequently uncovered to Ingleby, and showed him while 
saying good-bye, greater marks of respect than were fitting towards a 
common person meanly dressed." 

The other account says that Mr. Lacy knelt down on parting and 
craved the holy priest's blessing. In any case the two clergymen were 
struck by the marks of respect paid to the unknown, and suspected that 
he was a priest. They ran, therefore, and made inquiries, and finding 
that he was indeed a priest, they apprehended him and had him brought 
before the Council of the North, then sitting at the Old Palace, York, 
under the presidency of the Earl of Huntingdon, for the suppression of 
the Catholic religion. 

The Council said to the martyr that " they marvelled that he, being 
a gentleman of so great calling, would abase himself to be a priest. He 
answered that he made more account of his priesthood than of all other 
titles whatsoever." 

He was therefore committed a prisoner to the Castle, where he had 
a pair of fetters laid upon his legs at the prison door. The Catholic 
prisoners, who were confined there in large numbers for their religion, 
craved his blessing. With a smiling countenance he said : " I fear me 
I shall be overproud of my new boots," meaning his fetters. At the 
time of his imprisonment a minister, as usual, came to him to dispute 
about religion. 

" After Whitsuntide next following (1586)3! the gaol delivery, Sir 
Thomas Fairfax, vice-president, Henry Cheeke, Esquire, Ralph 
Huddlestone, Esquire, and the rest of the Council, arraigned Mr. 
Ingleby, and condemned him as a traitor because he was a priest of 
Rheims. With him they used much guileful dealing that they might 
entangle him with an oath to disclose in what Catholic men's houses he 
had been harboured, but they could not deceive him. When he was 
about to speak anything, they stopped him with railings and blasphemies, 
142 




The 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

overthwarting him in every word, and interrupting him by one frivolous 
question after another, so that before he had answered two words to one 
matter, they came upon him with another, inasmuch that many noted 
how they could not suffer him to make a perfect end of any one sentence, 
and this they did to make him contemptible in the eyes of the people." 
When he refused to take the oath of supremacy, which acknowledged 
the Queen to be the supreme governor of the Church, he said : " I will 
give unto the Queen subjection in so far forth that she has protection." 
And when he was condemned to death he spoke these words : " Credo 
videre bona Domini in terra viventium" ("1 believe that I shall see the 
good things of the Lord in the land of the living." ) 

Mr. Henry Cheeke, a member of the Council, openly derided and 
scoffed at the martyr because, when standing at the bar, he made the sign 
of the cross. It was noted at the time that within a few hours this man 
fell downstairs and broke his neck. Huddlestone had also a sudden 
and terrible death, falling down dead while waiting, in the ante-chamber 
of the Archbishop, for leave to put some poor Catholics to the torture. 

When the martyr was led from the place of judgment (no doubt 
the ancient Guildhall) back again into the Castle, the Catholic prisoners, 
looking forth of their windows, craved his blessing. Privily he gave it 
them, saying : " O sweet judgment ! " After his condemnation he 
showed such tokens of inward joy that the keeper (named Mr. Meverell) 
said that he took no small pleasure to observe his sweet and joyous 
conversation, and though he was a very earnest Puritan, he could not 
abstain from tears. He suffered on June 3, 1586, at the Tyburn at 
Knavesmire, which was situated about a mile and a half beyond 
Micklegate Bar, on the London road, near the present race-course. 
The place is still well known to the York Catholics, and an annual 
pilgrimage is made to it on Whitsun Tuesday in honour of the martyrs. 
Hither Margaret Clitherowe had been used to come in pilgrimage at 
midnight, walking barefoot from her house in the Shambles, and praying 
to the priests who had suffered there that she, too, might gain the 
martyrs' crown.* 

The sentence ran that he was to be drawn to the place of execution, 
where he was to be hanged, and then the halter was to be cut immediately, 
and while still fully alive, the sufferer was to be disembowelled and 
dismembered, and his heart torn out before his eyes. The body was 
then to be quartered, after being parboiled in a cauldron, and set up on 
the various gates of the city. All this was carried out in the case of the 
holy martyr, Francis Ingleby. 

* An old print of York preserved in the Merchant Adventurers' Hall in that city, 
shows the Tyburn with its gallows. It was a triple, tree like that of London. 
144 




THE VENERABLE FRANCIS INGLEBY 

From the original portrait at R'f>l?\ Gust If 



tfagc 144 



RIPLEY CASTLE AND ITS MARTYRED SON 

But the persecutors could not touch his blessed soul, which was 
received into the joy of its Lord, and obtained the unfading crown of 
those who persevere to the end, and who give the supreme pledge of 
love by surrendering even life itself for conscience' sake. 

" Great was the loss to York," writes his friend, Father Warford, 
" for he was most highly esteemed by all Catholics on account of his 
great zeal for souls, and especially for his remarkable prudence. He 
bore himself most constantly and bravely, and left all Catholics sore 
afflicted at his loss. They have preserved the memory of many of his 
sayings and doings, which are indeed worthy of note, though I cannot 
now recall them in detail. 

" He was a short man, but well made, and seemed thirty-five years 
of age or thereabouts. He was of light complexion, wore a chestnut 
beard and had a slight cast in his eyes. In mind he was quick and 
piercing, ready and facile in speech, of aspect grave and austere, and 
earnest and assiduous in action." 

It may be noted that his eldest brother William's wife, then Mrs. 
Ingleby, was a most devout and fervent Catholic, who suffered much for 
her religion. On March 25, 1592, she was with Lady Babthorpe, Lady 
Constable, Mrs. Metham, Mrs. Lawson, and Mrs. Hungate, committed 
by the Lord President to Sheriff Hutton Castle, where they were locked 
up, each separately, and not allowed a maid to wait on them, or to see 
their husbands or friends. They also had to pay large sums for their 
board. Here they were kept for nearly two years, the President sending 
every now and then ministers to dispute with them. They could have 
gained their release at any time, if they had been willing to go to the 
Protestant service. The keeper told them that he was bound in four 
hundred pounds that they should not speak with each other. But 
Lady Babthorpe told him he was very simple to bind himself in such 
manner, " for," said she, " a man hath enough to do to keep one 
woman, and would you undertake to keep and rule six women ? " 

As a matter of fact, they contrived sometimes to meet, and even get 
a priest into the prison to give them the Holy Sacraments. 

This was chiefly owing to the courage and resource of young Lady 
Babthorpe, our martyr's niece. She had "a hundred tricks and devices 
to cozen the keepers," and actually contrived to remove a whole 
window, so that the priest might enter. " For, taking a chisel and a 
hammer, and getting some to play at shuttlecock, that they might not 
hear her at such times as she cut the freestone of the window on the 
inside, where bars of the grate went in, so long time till she could take 
in the whole window, and let in the priest, and when he was gone, put 
up the grate again, and nothing was seen on the outside." 

T H5 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

When the Lord President, " a most rank heretic," examined her as 
to when she had gone to the Protestant services, she answered him : 
" Never." He then demanded how many Masses she had heard. She 
said : " So many that she could not reckon them." At this he began to 
stamp ! 

Her companions were of the like courage, more courageous indeed 
than their husbands, some of whom had yielded to the times so far as to 
go to church, though it seems probable that they all died good Catholics. 

These brave ladies were connected with one another by blood or 
marriage. Lady Constable was Margaret, daughter of Sir William 
Dormer, sister of the first Lord Dormer, and of the saintly Jane Dormer, 
Duchess of Feria, who had been Queen Mary's favourite lady-in-waiting. 
She was thus a grand-niece of the Carthusian martyr, Blessed Sebastian 
Newdigate. She was the wife of Sir Henry Constable of Holderness 
in Yorkshire, and her only son was created Viscount Dunbar in 1620. 
She is described by Strype as " an obstinate Recusant not to be reformed 
by any persuasion nor yet by coercion." 

Her saintly daughter, Dorothy, married Roger Lawson, of Heaton, 
the son of her fellow prisoner, Mrs. Lawson. This Mrs. Lawson was 
the wife of Ralph Lawson (afterwards Sir Ralph), of Brough, near 
Catterick, in Yorkshire, a family still Catholic. She had nine children, 
one of whom was born while she lay a prisoner in Sheriff Hutton Castle. 
This nearly cost her her life. 

Mrs. Ingleby was probably Catherine Smythe or Smethley of 
Brantingham, the second wife of William Ingleby. Grace, Lady 
Babthorpe, was her niece by marriage, being the daughter of Grace 
Ingleby, our martyr's sister. Lady Babthorpe had been left an orphan 
at an early age and had been brought up at Ripley Castle by her grand- 
mother, Lady Ingleby. Thus she must have been on intimate terms 
with her saintly uncle, whose spirit she had certainly imbibed. Her 
wonderful life story is told in the fascinating Chronicle of St. Monica 's, 
Louvain, where she died a professed nun in 1635, aged about 64. 

Mrs. Hungate was Margaret Sotheby, wife of William Hungate of 
Saxton, Esquire ; both she and her husband were presented for recusancy 
in 1 604. The Methams of Metham were also among the staunchest of 
Yorkshire Catholics, and Father Thomas Metham, S.J., died in prison for 
the faith. 

Sheriff Hutton Castle, where they were confined, is still a most 
imposing ruin. It lies about two miles north of Flaxton Station, on 
the line between Malton and Scarborough. It was a royal castle, and 
had served as a prison for even more illustrious captives, the Princess 
Elizabeth of York, afterwards Queen of Henry VII., and Edward 
146 




THE WEEPING CROSS, RIPLEY 




OLD OUSE BRIDGE, YORK 

With the Chapel of St. William converted into a prison To face page 146 



RIPLEY CASTLE AND ITS MARTYRED SON 

Plantagenet, Earl of Warwick, the only brother of Blessed Margaret 
Pole, the martyred Countess of Salisbury. It was built about 1410 by 
Ralph Neville, First Earl of Westmoreland, on so great a scale that 
Leland says, " he saw no house in the North so like a princely lodging." 

It had, however, fallen into much decay at the time of which we are 
writing, and was by no means a princely lodging for these Catholic 
ladies. But here they were kept, and if the Lord President had had his 
way, here they would have remained for the rest of their lives. 

At last, however, after two years, their husbands got them released, 
through bribing some of the ladies at court to intercede with the Queen 
for them. 

We have gleaned one or two more allusions to Venerable Francis 
Ingleby. At his martyrdom, one Humphrey Mountain, who would have 
taken some of his blood as a relic, was arrested and carried off to prison 
at the castle. 

" When Sir Francis Ingleby, priest, was to come over Ousebridge on 
a hurdle to execution, Robert Bickerdyke, going over the way to the 
Tollbooth (which stood on the bridge), a minister's wife in the street, 
on his way, said to her sister, who was with her : ' Let us go into 
the Tollbooth and we shall see the traitorly thief come over on the 
hurdle.' 'No, no thief,' quoth he: 'as true as thou art.' He said 
no more words than these, but they were the cause of his death, for he 
was denounced as a Catholic and he suffered martyrdom in his turn." 
Robert Bickerdyke was born at Low Hall, near Scotton, in the parish 
of Farnham, near Knaresborough, so that he was a neighbour of the 
Inglebys, and must have known our martyr well. He may very 
probably have been reconciled to the Church by Francis Ingleby. He 
could have saved his life by consenting to go to church, but preferred 
to die ; and so he bravely suffered at the York Tyburn, October 8, 
1586, only four months after the priest whose fair fame he had defended 
at the cost of his life. 

There are still Catholic Bickerdykes in the West Riding, who claim 
relationship with this brave, chivalrous young martyr. 

One most precious relic of Venerable Francis Ingleby still remains 
to us, the martyr's right hand, now preserved among the many relics 
of the English martyrs at the Franciscan convent, Taunton. It was 
brought to that community by his three nieces, Elizabeth, the daughter 
of Sampson Ingleby, and Marie and Grace, daughters of John Ingleby 
and Katherine Babthorpe. These three nieces of our martyr made 
their profession in the community, then settled at Brussels, on September 
17, in the year 1624. The confessor at the convent was at that time 
the glorious martyr, Venerable Francis Bell, O.F.M., and he has him- 

H7 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

self written the record of their profession in the community archives, 
which are still preserved. The Rev. Father Andrew a Soto, Commissary- 
General of the Order this side of the Alps, presided at the ceremony. 
Elizabeth Ingleby, who took the name of Sister Elizabeth Joseph, had 
been born at Spoffbrth. She was in her twenty-third year at her profes- 
sion. She died September 9, 1662, and the Annals quaintly say, "She 
was a parson of a most exemplar and labourious life, and prudent and 
discreet." She was buried at Bruges, whither the community migrated 
the year of her death. Her two cousins had predeceased her, and had 
died during the sojourn of the community at Nieuport. 

Grace, called in religion Sister Francis Clare, died December 6, 1639, 
in the forty-second year of her age. She had been Mistress of Novices 
for ten years, when " by an edifying, confident, and most pious death, 
she left us to enjoy her more desired Spouse and Saviour, Christ Jesus . . . 
whose blessed departure comforted her sorrowful friend and so unworthy 
confessor, who, as he assisted her passage and buried her ashes, so is 
he confident of her intercession." 

Marie, called in religion Sister Marie a Sta. Cruce, died May 25, 
1658. These two sisters were born, Marie at Harewell and Grace 
"at the same place, within a mile, at Dacres Hall in Yorkshire." 

Their peaceful lives and deaths in holy religion form a striking 
contrast to the cruel martyrdom of their saintly uncle, whose hand they 
cherished as their greatest treasure, and gave to their community as 
the most precious portion of their dowry. 



148 



AN OXFORD MARTYR* 



I 



visitor to Oxford cannot fail to be impressed by a stately 
monument erected in a commanding position in the old city, 
hard by the beautiful Church of St. Mary Magdalen. It looks 
down the magnificent avenue known as " St. Giles','' while 
opposite to it, at the other end of that avenue, stands the old-world 
church of that name. The monument, though evidently modern, is 
designed after the pattern of those Eleanor Crosses which the first 
Edward raised to the memory of his beloved consort. So fair is it 
that it awakes the admiration of the stranger, and he stops to ask what 
it may be. He is told that it is called the "Martyrs' Memorial." 

He then observes that the figures which ornament this beautiful 
Gothic Cross are not those of Catholic saints, but of Protestant 
divines, clad in the garb of Geneva. And he gathers, if he has patience 
to decipher a long inscription, that this Memorial was erected in 1841 as a 
tribute of homage to three famous Anglican Bishops who here suffered the 
penalties inflicted in their day on obstinate and relapsed heretics in a 
word, this is the monument of Cranmer, Ridley, and Latimer, who were 
executed hard by in the reign of Queen Mary. 

This gives rise to various and varied reflections. The Catholic regrets, 
as much as the Protestant, the barbarities of the past, or, rather, his 
i egrets are far more poignant, for he realises how much harm they have 
done to the sacred cause he cherishes. Perhaps he feels with the great 
Pugin that this is " the most painfully beautiful " monument in Oxford, 
and perhaps he envies the blissful ignorance of the Catholic Bishop from 
China, who admired it so much that he wished he could carry it ofF with 
him and erect it outside his Cathedral ! On the other hand, Oxford 
Anglicans themselves regard it with mingled feelings. There was one 
old dignitary of High Church views who used to salute it as he passed, 
explaining to his scandalised companion that he was " thanking God that 
he belonged to the University which burned those blackguards ! " 
Others, without going to these lengths, heartily regret the erection of 
the Monument, and console themselves with the reflection that the 
" martyrs " were all of them Cambridge men ! " Cambridge nurtured 
them, and Oxford burned them," they say, not without a spice of malice. 

But to the Catholic pilgrim Oxford has memories of martyrs far more 
glorious and more real. Almost every one of her stately Colleges has 
given recruits to that white-robed army which has glorified God by their 

* The writer wishes to express his acknowledgments to Miss Louise Imogen Guincy, 
who has most generously given him all her notes on the martyr and his home. Many- 
passages from these appear here without quotation-marks. 

149 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

blood poured out like water for the ancient Faith and the primacy of 
the Apostolic See, in the dark days of national apostacy. Oxford, indeed, 
is only of late waking up to this fact. She hardly knows the names 
of many of these martyrs of hers, yet there are signs that she is at last 
beginning to appreciate her treasures. Two years ago in the " Oxford 
Magazine," the principal organ of the University, appeared an epigram, 
which, though but a trifle, may yet serve to show the direction of the 
wind. It ran as follows : 

"To be mother of martyrs, proud Cambridge is fain, 
Cranmer, Latimer, Ridley, whom Oxford hath slain : 
But of martyrs less doubtful, which boasts the chief store ? 
True, Cambridge has Fisher, but Oxford has MORE " 

and to the epigram was appended the note that of the Catholic martyrs 
beatified by Leo XIII., not only the Blessed Thomas More, but the 
vast majority were Oxford men. 

It is in honour of one of these true martyrs of Oxford that we are 
about to make our pilgrimage. 

A quaint old street, full of delightful old houses, leads from the 
heart of Oxford, where stand the Bodleian Library, the Sheldonian 
Theatre, and the great group of University buildings around them, 
down by the outskirts of New College and the ancient wall of the city 
towards the ancient Manor of Holywell. Here we are out of the city 
proper, in a charming quarter of playing-fields and parks, where young 
Oxford takes its pleasure. These green fields form a noble setting for the 
picture of the towers and spires and old grey Colleges, which make the 
unique beauty of the place. 

And here is an ancient Church dedicated to the Holy Cross of Christ, 
and beside it a precious fragment of an Elizabethan Manor House 
the Manor House of Holywell. 

Our photographs reveal the old grey group of buildings at a glance. 
The little chapel with its fleche is, of course, modern, though it contains 
the Holy Well which, since Saxon days, has given its name to the place. 
Modern, too, and deplorable in its ugliness is the red brick addition of 
which the photograph reveals as little as may be. But the building 
which lies between these modern intrusions is genuine Elizabethan, and 
is something more, for it is the home, if not the birthplace, of a 
martyr of Christ. 

This old Manor House is the shrine where the sanctuary lamp was 
kept burning, in those dark days when Oxford had lost the light. Here, 
in some hidden sanctuary, the Holy Mass was celebrated in secret for 
two weary centuries of persecution, when the names of Oxford's colleges 
150 




THE MANOR HOUSE AND CHURCH OF ST. CROSS 




HOLYWELL MANOR HOUSE 



To face pa $c 150 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

Corpus Christi, and All Souls, and Our Lady of Oriel had ceased to 
have any meaning for the sons of Oxford. 

Here, at least, the Holy Cross was still venerated, nay more, was 
fervently embraced, long after it had been forgotten in the Church hard 
by. And here there grew to manhood a son of Oxford who carried that 
Cross to his Calvary in Oxford town. 

It is the story of the Venerable George Napier of Holywell Manor 
House that we have to tell. 

The Manor was there in Saxon days, we know, and, after the Norman 
Conquest, came, as did so many other rich properties in this neigh- 
bourhood, to Robert d'Oilly, the builder of the Castle. King Henry III. 
gave it to Merton College, then newly founded. A bundle of rolls, 
entitled " Holywell," is preserved in Merton College treasury, contain- 
ing many curious particulars of the Manor. The College, on its own 
immense lands, had anciently the privilege of its own pound, pillory and 
gallows, and even a court where wills were proved. 

We think of the Manor House standing alone, as it does in Loggan's 
chart, a grey bulk between the Church and the stream, with fields all about 
it, and the walls of Oxford, still unbroken, lying north, with glimpses of 
her towers over or through them. In Elizabeth's time, the south side of 
Holywell Street began to spring up. There was a group of low roofs 
facing the churchyard, taken away not many years ago ; and the old sloping 
cottages opposite the Manor gate may well have slept at the angle of the 
road, while the sworded Napier men were yet coming and going in 
the saddle, escorting some quiet stranger who was a "massing-priest " 
in disguise. 

The more antique portion of the present structure is all that remains 
of the house rebuilt in the latter half of the sixteenth century ; the thick 
walls, the drip stones, the dark interior panellings, and the little high 
windows for defence, all date from the Napier days. There is a tiny 
supposed priest-hole upstairs. If it were not for the modern additions, 
the whole building would still be in a great measure romantic. It is 
certainly still interesting, and challenges instant attention, in its quasi- 
isolation. 

The Manor takes its name from the Holy Well, which was dedicated 
to St. Winifred and St. Margaret. Though long venerated, it was 
covered up, and practically lost for centuries. Hearne, the antiquary, 
apparently thinks that the Well and its pilgrims lived on secretly, under 
the favour of the Napiers. He says : " The ordinary devotions per- 
formed by the sick people and other vigilants [at the Well] might be 
made in the House where distinct rooms were appointed to that end, 
and all the other suitable accommodation prepared for reception of all 

151 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

comers." * When the Manor passed out of the hands of Catholics, this, 
of course, all ceased. 

The Holy Well came to light again only in our own day, after the 
old Catholic Manor House had passed into the possession of a Com- 
munity of Anglican Sisters who there carry on a work of rescue for poor 
girls. Their little Chapel was built, inadvertently, directly over the Well. 
In the north wall of this building there is now fixed a tablet, which 
reads: "Beneath this stone the Holy Well was discovered, 1896, in 
enlarging this Chapel. The ancient tabular Anglo-Saxon stone was 
found in its original position outside the existing north wall of the Well 
chamber. The upper rim of the stone was about 3 ft. 3 ins. from the 
floor level of the Chapel ; its lower rim was set up on the three stones it 
still rests on, in the well-chamber below. These three unworked stones 
were found placed an equal distance apart in the sandy bed of the spring, 
and upon them the old tabular stone rested." 

The small, clean crypt, or well-chamber, is entered by means of a 
sliding door and steps, from the nave. W T hile the Well was yet " in the 
garden," but in ruins, it was turned for a while into a bathing-place. It 
is probable that a chapel, or shrine, stood directly over the Well in 
mediaeval times. 

Holier than the Well which gives its name to the place, are the 
memories of the martyr whose home it was. Let us gather up what 
history tells of him. 

In the reign of Henry VIII., the Manor was leased by Merton 
College to one William Clare, a well-to-do grazier, who was one of the 
bailiffs of the City.f 

Upon this good man's death, Joan, his widow, married, apparently 
about 1 530, a Fellow of All Souls, one Edward Napier, M.A., who was 
still a young man.J This Edward Napier (or Napper) was from Swyre, 
in Dorset, and was descended from the Napiers of Merchistoun and 
Rosky in Scotland, who were scions of the ducal house of Lennox ; while 
his grandmother was Anne, heiress of John Russell of Swyre, of the 
family of the Earls (now Dukes) of Bedford. 

Edward Napier settled down at Holywell, though not in the present 
house. His wife died in 1545, leaving him one daughter, Joan, who 
married Thomas Greenwood, an Oxford barrister. Their family remained 
faithful Catholics till its extinction in the nineteenth century, and their 
eldest son, John, of Brize Norton, married a great-granddaughter of 

Hearne's Collections, vol. iii. (1710-12). Oxford Hist. Socy, 1889. P. 403. 

t Oxford Post-Reformation Catholic Minions, by Mrs. Stapleton (University Press, 1906), 
p. 211. We are greatly indebted to this valuable work. 

\ He was elected Fellow in 1527 and proceeded M.A. in 1530. Boase, Register, vol. i. 
152 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

Blessed Thomas More. Thomas Greenwood himself died in 1577, and 
Was buried in Holywell Church. 

Edward Napier, left a widower, married, in 1 547, * Anne, daughter 
of Sir John Peto, of Chesterton in Warwickshire. She was a niece of 
the famous Cardinal Peto, the Franciscan of Greenwich, who had so 
boldly withstood Henry VIII. to the face, when he projected his miserable 
divorce. 

By his second wife, Mr. Napier had two sons, William and George. 
Both were to prove worthy of their father and of their heroic uncle, and 
the younger was destined to gild the family name with imperishable 
glory. From the accounts of George Napier's martyrdom, we learn that 
he was already an old man, and one document (in the Vatican archives) 
gives his age as about sixty. He was probably born as early as 1548, so 
that he would be ten years old at his father's death. 

For that sad year which saw the death of the Catholic Queen, and 
that of the last true Archbishop of Canterbury, saw also Holywell Manor 
House left desolate. Edward Napier was, indeed, happy in the time of his 
death, for he was spared the sight of the evils to come. He had been a 
great benefactor to the University, and had given liberally towards the 
repair of the schools, especially of the Divinity school, which " had been 
either pulled down or quite ruinated in the time of Edward VI." f 

The solemn Requiem Mass at Edward Napier's funeral will have 
been one of the last that were ever sung in the fine old parish church of 
St. Peter-in-the-East, where he was laid to rest " in our Lady's Chapel 
under the upper window by the side of his first wife." J Henceforth 
Holy Mass in England was to be said in secret at the risk of liberty 
or life. 

In his will, our martyr's father left all his lands in South Petherton, 
Somerset, to his own College of All Souls, upon condition " that they 
keep his obit yearly, and give to three of the poorest Fellows of the 
said College, to be chosen by the Warden, 2 6s. 8d. apiece yearly, so that 
they were actually priests, or else within three years after they had first 
partaken of the said Exhibition." 

Alas ! in that most beautiful Chapel of Chichele's foundation, dedi- 
cated to the blessed English dead of Agincourt and " to all Christen 
soules " it is much to be feared that no " obit " is kept for Edward 
Napier. 

* The licence is dated January 25, 1546-47. Chester's London Marriage Licenses, ed 
Foster. London, 1887. 

f Wood, History and Antiquities of the University, vol. ii. part ii. p. 764. 

t Wood, City of Oxford, iii. p. 254. 

Wood, History and Antiquities of the University (1786), vol. iii. p. 264. 

u 153 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The widow, Anne Napier, thus left with two little boys (and, as it 
would appear, some little girls also) re-married with Philip Huckle, of 
Merton College, a worthy man who leased a large estate from his 
College. It was he who built the Manor House, which was yet un- 
finished at the time of his death in 1576.* His wife died some four 
years earlier. 

It was a long time before Elizabeth succeeded in de-Catholicising 
Oxford, and during the early years of her reign the old religion was still 
powerful in the University. 

George, the future martyr, was educated at an Oxford grammar- 
school and then at Corpus Christi College, and we have an interesting 
account of the part which he took in defending that most Catholic 
foundation against the assaults of the Government. 

Anthony Wood may be allowed to tell the story in his own words.f 

Thomas Greenway, President of Corpus, having resigned in 1568, 
the Queen recommended to the choice of the Fellows " one William 
Cole, sometime Fellow of that College, afterwards an exile in Queen 
Mary's reign, suffering then very great hardships at Zurich. But the 
Fellows, who were most inclined to the Roman Catholic persuasion, made 
choice of a Robert Harrison, M.A., not long since removed from the 
College by the Visitor for his ... Religion, not at all taking notice of 
the said Cole, being very unwilling to have him, his wife and children, 
and his Zurichian discipline introduced among them. 

" The Queen hereupon annulled the election, and sent word to the 
Fellows that they should elect Cole, for what they had already done, 
was, as she alleged, against the Statutes. They submissively give answer 
to the contrary, and add that what they had done was according to their 
consciences and oaths. The Queen, not content with that answer, sends 
Dr. Home, Bishop of Winchester, Visitor of the College, to admit him, 
but when he and his retinue came, they found the College gate shut 
against them. At length, after he had made his way in, he repaired to 
the Chapel, where, after the Senior Fellows were gathered together, told 
them his business, not unknown (as he said) to them, and then asked 
each person by seniority, whether they would admit Mr. Cole ; but 
they all denying, as not in a possibility of receding from what they had 
done, he pronounced them non Socii, and then, with the consent of the 
next Fellows, admitted him. 

"About the same time (viz. July 21) a Commission was sent down 
from the Queen, directed to the Chancellor of the University, the said 
Bishop of Winchester, Sir William Cecil, Principal Secretary, Thomas 
Cooper, Lawrence Humphrey, Doctors of Divinity, and George Acworth, 

* Stapleton, of. cit. pp. 21 1-12. ( Wood, op. at. vol. ii. part i. p. 165. 

'54 




CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE, OXFORD 

Exterior view from iMerton Street 




CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE, OXFORD 

From an old print To face page 154 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

Doctor of the Laws, to visit the said College, and to correct and amend 
whatsoever they found amiss, and to expel the principal delinquents. 
The sum of all was that after a strict enquiry and examination of several 
persons, they expelled some as Roman Catholics, curbed those that were 
suspected to incline that way, and gave encouragement to the Protestants. 
Three of those so ejected were Edmund Rainolds, Miles Windsore, and 
George Napier. The first . . . receded to Gloucester Hall * (a place to 
which lovers of the Catholic religion retired for their quiet) where he 
living in great retiredness, arrived to the age of ninety-two, and died a 
wealthy man . . . 

"As for the third, George Napier, he went afterwards beyond the 
seas, where spending some time in one of the English Colleges, that was 
about these times erected, came again into England, and lived as a 
Seminary Priest among his relations, sometimes in Holywell near Oxford, 
and sometimes in the country near adjoining among those of his pro- 
fession." f 

We may here break off Anthony Wood's narrative. In 1568 George 
Napier was still a young man, probably about twenty years old. This 
was not exceptionally young for an Oxford Fellow in those days. Some 
have indeed conjectured that the Fellow of Corpus cannot have been the 
martyr, but there is no record of another George Napier in the family 
history. Wood too, besides his " constitutional accuracy," was an intimate 
friend of the Napier family, and cannot have been mistaken on so 
important a question. 

As to the President, whom Elizabeth and that bitter Protestant, 
Bishop Home, intruded with such violence on a Catholic College, he 
was no credit to their choice. " As for Mr. Cole," continues Wood, 
" (who was the first married President that Corpus Christi College ever 
had) he, being settled in his place, acted so foully by defrauding the 
College and bringing it into debt, that divers complaints were put up 
against him to the Bishop of Winchester, Visitor of that College." 
Home was obliged to take his friend to task. " Well, well, Mr. Presi- 
dent, seeing it is so, you and the College must part without any more 
ado ; and therefore see that you provide for yourself." Cole was 
thunderstruck. "What, my good Lord, must I then eat mice 
at Zurich again ? " he faltered. This allusion to their common exile 
so touched Home that he allowed the defaulter to remain, and in 

* The ancient Benedictine Hall, now Worcester College. 

f It is worth while to point out here that this proceeding of Queen Elizabeth is hushed 
up and almost unknown : whereas because James II. did the very same arbitrary thing at 
Magdalen College a century later, a most tremendous " to-do " has been made about it by 
historians. 

155 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

the end he got no worse punishment than translation to the Deanery 
of Lincoln ! 

George Napier, who preferred to be expelled rather than submit to 
see Bishop Fox's glorious foundation in honour of the Adorable Sacra- 
ment desecrated by the government of a married apostate, had no such 
worldly honours to look for. His was henceforth to tread the Royal 
Highway of the Holy Cross. 

After his expulsion, unfortunately, the records of his movements 
during the years that follow are very scanty, and there are gaps which 
it seems impossible to fill up ; but it would seem probable that for some 
years he lived quietly in England, no doubt chiefly at Holywell. 

His stepfather died in 1576, and was succeeded at Holywell by 
William Napier, our martyr's elder brother. William was a very staunch 
Catholic, who was willing and glad to risk the terrible dangers of har- 
bouring priests in the new Manor House, which he was left to finish. 
No doubt he took care to provide several hiding-places in the building, 
He had provided others elsewhere, as we shall soon see. 

Mr. Napier was possessed of considerable property, and no doubt 
had to pay the cruel recusancy fines. He was himself a Brasenose 
man, and took his M.A. in 1568, the year of his brother's expulsion 
from Corpus. George Napier was not, indeed, the only future martyr 
to be expelled from that College. In 1560 the Venerable James Fenn 
had been deprived of his fellowship for Popery, and had retired for a. 
time to Gloucester Hall. 

William Napier made a good marriage, in the worldly sense ofr 
the word, when he espoused Isabel, daughter of Edmund Powell, of 
Sandford-on-Thames. This family was an important one, but unfor 
tunately it became entangled with the fatal possession of monastic lands, 
and, though always Catholic, it did not escape the usual fate of such 
owners. Sandford Manor itself was anciently a Preceptory of the 
Knights Templars, and the Powells also owned the Mynchery at Little- 
more, and the site of the W 7 hite Friars' Convent at Oxford. Little 
wonder, then, if they soon became extinct. 

Isabel Napier bore her husband seven children, and at her death, 
in 1584, she must have still been well under forty. Her husband 
never shrank from sacrifices for the faith he loved so well. Wood 
tells us that he had a farm at Cowley, near Oxford, and that he let 
part of the land to a good Catholic mason, named Badger, "who 
built a house thereon, about the latter end of Queen Elizabeth's 
reign, for a hiding-hole for a priest, or any other lay-Catholic in times 
of persecution." We may easily imagine that George, as well as the; 
other priests whom Mr. Napier harboured, used this house. 
156 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

Our martyr's life from the time that he was expelled from Corpus in 
1568, to his ordination, in 1593, is, as we have said, exceedingly obscure. 
Only some scattered notices remain to us, which we have pieced together as 
best we may. The entries in the Douay Diary suggest that his career was 
a very chequered one, but we have no clue as to -the reasons, whether of 
health or other difficulty, which deferred his ordination so long. 

In 1574, a " Mr. Napper " was staying at a Mr. Tyrrell's at Rawle, 
in Essex, and a " false brother," one Davy Johnes, a Protestant minister 
masquerading as a Catholic, betrayed him to the authorities, but did not 
succeed in getting him arrested." From the context it would appear 
that this Mr. Napper was a priest, but this is not at all certain. 
George Napier may have been just as obnoxious to the Government 
for his religious zeal before his ordination as after it. His fidelity at 
Corpus would have made him a marked man. In 1579,011 August 24^ 
a Mr. Napper came to the College at Rheims ; this will no doubt 
have been our martyr.f He did not, however, stay long in the 
College, for the next thing we hear of him is that he was in prison 
in England. 

He came to Rheims just in time to see Dr. Allen, who, only three 
days later, left for Rome with his brother Gabriel and a little party of 
friends. It is probable that George may have come over principally 
to see his old Oxford friends at the College, and possibly, also, to 
consult them about his vocation. 

In December, 1580, news came to Rheims that Blessed Ralph Sherwin 
and other priests had been arrested and thrown into prison, and that 
besides the priests there had also been arrested four laymen John 
Paschall (Sherwin's friend and protege), Mr. Vavasour, Mr. Dibdale, 
and Mr. George Napper. Paschall was, we know, in the Marshalsea, 
but George Napier seems to have been imprisoned in the Counter or 
Compter, Wood Street, Cheapside. At least we find him there in 1588 
or 1589. There is no certainty that his imprisonment lasted all these 
years ; he may possibly have been released and arrested again in this 
interval, but it seems more probable that he lay in prison for some 
nine years. The cause of his imprisonment was simply recusancy, that 
is to say, the Catholic religion. This we know from the persecutor's 
own admission. 

In the Lansdowne MSB. in the British Museum, is a paper J dated 
September 30, 1588, and endorsed "Certificate of Seminary Priests 
and Recusants in the prisons in and about London." The prisoners are 
classified according to their degree of " guilt." The first class are those 

* Morris, Troubles, series ii. p. 303. t Douay Diaries, p. 155. 

t Printed C.R.S. vol. ii. (1906), pp. 282-84. 

157 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

" by their own confessions guilty of treason or felony," i.e. persons who 
had confessed that they were Seminary priests, or that they had been 
reconciled to the Church since 1585, when by statute it had been 
made treason to be ordained priest abroad and return to England, and 
felony to be reconciled. Then come other classes, and finally, No. 7 : 
" These persons are only Recusants." Among this last class is our 
martyr's name, " George Napper." 

Unable to pay the heavy fines for not attending the Protestant 
service, he had been thrown into prison. We find the reason for his 
being classed among the least "guilty" of the confessors, in a paper 
which has fortunately been preserved in the Public Record Office. It is 
calendared as the "Submission of George Napper," and assigned to the 
first half of 1589. It is probably, however, somewhat earlier in date. It 
has never been printed before, so we give it in full. 

"1, George Napper, unfeignedly profess and with my whole heart, 
that I am thoroughly and altogether persuaded, and do truly think in 
my conscience that the Lady Elizabeth, the Queen's Majesty that now 
is, is our lawful, true, natural and rightful Queen, and that she hath, 
and of right ought to have, all superiority, jurisdiction, pre-eminence 
and authority on all persons within England and Ireland and all other 
her dominions which any other prince hath, or at any other time hath 
had, over his own dominions in Christendom : and that no foreign 
prince, prelate, estate or potentate, may or ought any way to pre-vindicate 
the said superiority, jurisdiction, pre-eminence or authority within her 
Majesty's dominions, countries and seignories : and I unfeignedly 
protest likewise that I have, and ought to have, such care of her Majesty's 
most royal person, that I will with all my endeavours seek to over- 
throw and persecute even to the very death all such as shall any way 
impugn her Highness' life or go about or intend any such traitorous 
practice, yea, or lift up their finger against her, either to take any drop 
of blood from her, or to diminish any iota of her foresaid titles within 
her Majesty's countries, of what estate, condition or degree so ever 
they be ; which I am, and always will be, ready to aver and justify 
against all men with my blood. 

" In witness whereof I have hereto set my hand. 

" By me, GEORGE NAPPER, 
" Prisoner in the Compter in Wood Street." 

This evidently sincere and heartfelt profession of loyalty to his 
temporal Sovereign ought, one would imagine, to have saved the writer 
from the cruel imputation of treason. Yet, as we shall see, it is under 
that imputation that he died. His statement, as a prisoner, does but 
158 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

embody the sentiments of the vast majority of English Catholics, who 
were conspicuously loyal throughout the long reign of a Sovereign who, 
heaping ever new burdens upon their devoted heads, seemed determined 
to test their heroic fidelity to her person by trials more cruel than death. 

That George Napier's loyalty to his Sovereign was without prejudice 
to that higher loyalty which he owed to the Church and to Christ's 
Vicar, his whole life and his heroic death sufficiently prove. 

We do not know how much longer he remained a prisoner, but he 
was certainly at Douay in 1594. In the summer of the previous year, 
the English College had been moved back from Rheims to its original 
home and George Napier matriculated at the University of Douay on 
April i, 1594.* Two years later he was ordained priest.f 

About 1591 a well-known priest, who became later on in life a Jesuit, 
came to stay at Holywell Manor House. This was William Warneford 
(or Warford) a Yorkshireman of Trinity College. He had been ordained 
in 1584, and we owe to him some interesting reminiscences of the martyrs 
he had known at Oxford and elsewhere. Cardinal Allen himself sug- 
gested " that Dr. Walford will be well provided for in Oxford with 
Mr. Napper, a renowned and virtuous Catholic." J 

Oxford had lately been the scene of martyrdoms,^ therefore it 
instantly became a most desirable place to those whom a King 
of England once called " God Almighty's fools." With Father 
Warford came from abroad one " Napper of Oxford," and eight 
others. One of the ubiquitous spies reports in July, 1591, " These ten 
came in one company, arrived about a month since, were brought by a 
merchant man of London who had 60 for reward. Landed in an out- 
creek near Plymouth." || We cannot be certain, but it is most probable 
that it was George Napier, now released from prison and at Rheims, 
who took this opportunity of visiting his home, and that he came with 
his friend to Holywell, though it is, of course, just possible that Mr. 
Napier of Holywell had himself gone abroad in order to bring back the 
priest in safety to Oxford. 

If it were George, he must have soon returned to the College to 
continue his preparations for the priesthood. 

Even after his ordination he did not enter upon his mission work for 

* Douay Diaries, p. 282. The scribe, in the official list of matriculations, calls him. 
by a slip of the pen, Gngorius, instead of Georgius. 

t Ibid. p. 1 6. 

I Cal. Dom. Eliz. 1591-94, p. 28. 

Ven. George Nicols, Richard Yaxley, priests, Thomas Belson, gentleman, and 
Humphrey Pritchard, a servant at the Catherine Wheel Inn, were martyred at Oxford 
Castle, July 5, 1589. || Cal. Dom. Eliz. 1591-94, p. 79. 

159 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

some years, but went to live at Antwerp, where, according to Challoner, 
he spent the next seven years, till the end of the reign of Elizabeth. 
Only after the old Queen's death do we get the entry in the College 
Diary of George Napier's being sent to labour in the vineyard. It was 
almost the eleventh hour. 

"Anno 1603, [in Angliam missus] Georgius Napperus." 

Seven years of fruitful v/ork still, however, lay before him, though 
he was already past middle life. The clear, late evening had gloriously 
set in. "The rain is over and gone." 

We have little or no details as to the seven years of his missionary 
life. Dr. Worthington compresses them into one sentence one, indeed, 
which could be predicated of all our martyr-priests Strenuam navavit 
lucrandis animabus operam, or, as Challoner translates it, " he was remark- 
ably laborious in winning souls to God." Wood tells us that he "lived 
as a Seminary Priest among his relations, sometimes in Holywell near 
Oxford, and sometimes in the country near adjoining, among those or 
his profession." 

It must have been a happy home-coming to the dear old Manor 
House, then indeed new in all its fresh beauty, to the faithful brother 
who loved him so tenderly and respected his sacred office so intensely 
that he was glad to risk his life and fortune by sheltering the proscribed 
priest beneath his roof. The family at Holywell had grown since 
George Napier's imprisonment and exile. William's eldest son, Edmund, 
was born in 1 579, so he may have already known his uncle. William, the 
third, was born three years later, on the feast of St. Gregory, 1582, when 
George was probably already in prison. 

There were also three other sons, Maurice, Christopher, and Thomas, 
and a daughter named Mary.f They lost their mother in 1584, perhaps 
at the birth of the youngest child ; she was interred in the Chancel of 
Holywell Church, on July 7, 1584. Her husband remained faithful to 
her memory during the seven and thirty years that he survived her. 
Probably one of his sisters (whose names we do not know) lived with 
him at Holywell. 

It was thus to a widower's house that George Napier was welcomed 
in the first year of the new reign, that reign which opened with such 
bright hopes for Catholics, for was it not the son of Mary Stuart who 
now filled the throne ? They had yet to learn that one who could betray 

* Cal. Dom. Eliz. 1591-94, p. 33. 

f William married into the Devonshire family of Gandy ; Thomas married Mary Collins, 
of Cowley ; Christopher died, a bachelor, in London. Only from a note of Hearne's do 
we learn of the existence of Maurice, whom he calls the second son. Bodl. Hearne's MSS., 
60, f. 142. 
1 60 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

his own mother to a cruel and shameful death was not likely to shrink 
from breaking his promises to others, if he could gain anything by 
doing so. 

However, in the wonderful revival of Catholic activity that heralded 
the new regime, George Napier took his full share. He divided his 
time between Holywell and Temple Cowley, making excursions into the 
neighbourhood wherever there were Catholic souls to tend, or hope of 
bringing some stray sheep into the fold. 

No doubt he had the happiness of giving the nuptial blessing to his 
nephew Edmund, when, in 1609, he married Joyce, daughter of John 
Wakeman, Esq., of Beckford, County Gloucester. The bride had good 
Catholic blood in her veins (her mother was a Giffard of Chillington), 
and she was to have the honour of suffering imprisonment for her faith. 

Their first child, William, was born in June and died in August, 
1610, the year of George Napier's martyrdom. But this union was 
blessed with ten other children, one of whom bore his martyred uncle's 
name, and this younger George Napier, though the fourth son, eventu- 
ally succeeded to the Holywell estates. Two more, William, the third, 
and Charles, the eighth, son, became Franciscans, and of these William 
(or Father Marianus as he was called), had the honour of being con- 
demned to death for his priesthood, like his holy uncle. This was during 
the Gates Plot, in 1679, but unlike his uncle, the Franciscan was reprieved, 
though detained in prison till 1684, when he was exiled. 

But we must return to our martyr. Though we know so little about 
his apostolic labours, we have at least the most minute details of his 
glorious end. 

An account has come down to us, written by an intimate friend and 
fellow-prisoner, which is one of the most touching and exquisite 
memorials of the days of persecution. It is strange that this should 
never yet have been printed in full, though Bishop Challoner more suo 
abridged and paraphrased it in his Memoirs of Missionary Priests.* One 
manuscript is preserved in the Bodleian Library at Oxford,f and we 
have collated it with another copy which belongs to the Archives of the 
See of Westminster,^ and with the copy used by Bishop Challoner himself, 
which is at Oscott College. Challoner's copy is taken (as he informs us) from 
a MS. in the Knaresborough collection. The Bodleian MS. is contained 
in a large quarto volume, which formerly belonged to Hearne, the Oxford 
antiquary. It is entitled, " Account of y e Apprehension and Execution of 
Mr. George Napper, Priest," and is written in a contemporary hand. 

* The latter part he has transcribed accurately enough. 
f Ratolinson MSS. D. 399, ff. 213-16^. 
j Arch. West. ix. n. 90. 

x 161 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

We have modernised the spelling, but have made no other alterations 
in the narrative. 

" My Reverend Friend, according unto your request, as near as my 
memory will give me leave, I have set down all accidents that have 
fallen out from his first apprehension until his farewell in this world. 

" Imprimis, I have heard him say many times upon occasions of 
speeches, that he did pray to God that it would please His Majesty 
that if ever he should fall into the hands of his enemies, that he 
might not be taken in his friend's house ; and it seemed that God heard 
his prayers, for being seen by a young wretched companion, or, as I 
think, rather, by a couple, to go into an honest woman's house on 
July 1 8 (being on a Wednesday) towards evening one of the knaves 
said to his other companion that there was a priest gone to such a 
house, wishing that the Vicar might have understanding of it.* Where- 
upon one of them went to the Vicar's house and demanded of his 
daughter where her father was, who answered him, he was not within, 
fearing he did come to do her father some harm. The cause of the 
fear was that there had passed many words between the fellow and her 
father a little time before. And another reason moved her, too, by 
reason of a dream the Vicar's daughter had dreamed the night before 
which was, as she confessed, that her father was killed, therefore she 
cried to her mother that she should in no case tell where her father 
was. 

"The fellow, all this while standing at the door and hearing the 
maid's fear, called to her mother that she should not doubt any such 
matter, for his coming was to let him understand that there was a priest 
in such a house, requesting his aid and counsel in apprehending or him. 
The Vicar's wife, hearing such news, leapt from her stool with great joy 
and called her husband to the fellow, who presently united themselves 
in friendship, and concluded how to take him, which was that they 
would forbear him that night, and watch his coming out, and then to 
apprehend him ; and so they did, for the next day being the igth of 
July and Thursday, the blessed man departing and going down a close, 
one of the knaves met him, stayed him, and said unto him that he must 
have him before a justice to be examined whether he was a priest or no. 

" And so the good man went quietly back again with the fellow, who 
brought him to the constable and charged him to keep him safe, and to 
have him before Sir Francis Evers,f and so he did. And going on the 

This happened at Kirtlington, a village about four miles north-east of Woodstock, and 
nine miles north of Oxford. 

t Sir Francis Eure, or Evers, of Heyford Warren. Hey ford lies on the Cherwell, seven 
miles north-east of Woodstock. The old Elizabethan Manor House still stands here. 
162 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

way he called to mind a Pyx which he had about his neck with a couple 
of consecrated Hosts which he took great care of, lest They should 
happen into the hands of his enemies, and thinking within himself what 
he might do to preserve Them, he prayed to God to save Them, until 
such time that he might receive Them with reverence. He made an 
excuse to withdraw himself to a bush seeming to untruss a point, and 
so thinking to convey Them into the bush to save Them, but they had 
so vigilant an eye over him that he could not hide Them. And still 
praying in his mind and seeming to move his neckcloth (by reason it 
rained a little) by God's appointed goodness he did untie the knot, and 
the Pyx fell down between his shirt and his skin, down to his knee and 
there stayed. And likewise having a little bag of relics about his neck 
he loosed that, so that it slid down to the other knee, and there stayed. 

"And when they brought him before Sir Francis Evers, he caused the 
Constable who dwelt in the town to search him from top to toe, pulling 
off his shoes, and as the blessed man did think, the Constable did many 
times touch both the Pyx and the bag, but God of His marvellous mercy 
saved them both from being found. And in the dead time of the night, 
as he told me, he did rise and with as much reverence as time and place 
would give him leave, he received the consecrated Hosts, and saved 
Them from being polluted. 

" Sir Francis used him very kindly and so did my Lady, and provided 
him a mess of broth for his supper and likewise in the morning a mess 
of milk with cinnamon and sugar ; and when the Constable had thoroughly 
searched him and found many things about him, as his service book and 
a book of notes, a little oils, his needle case, thimble, and thread, he told 
him he was but a poor priest, and, in his conscience, he was no statesman. 
The knight willed the High Constable to take him to look well to him ; 
he answered that he would make him sure, for he would put him into the 
stocks, but the Justice said he should not do so by no means, and prayed 
him to let him have a good bed, and anything that he would call for. 
So the next day they brought him to Oxenford, being aoth of July. 

" The Assizes drawing on and being come, he was brought to the Bar 
and was called by the name of George Napper to answer his indictments, 
which was that he was a traitor ; then Justice Croke asked him if he 
were guilty ; he said, ' No.' ' How will you be tried ? ' He said, 
' By God and the country.' He asked him if he were a priest. He 
said if any man could prove him so, let him have the laws. ' Will 
you,' said the Justice Croke, ' deny that you are no priest ? ' He 
answered, ' If any man can prove me a priest, let him say so.' Then 
the Judge said to the Jury, c My Masters, you hear he will not deny 
that he is a priest, therefore you may well think what he is ; but if he 

163 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

will say he is no priest, I will believe him. But these things that were 
found about him doth manifestly show that he is one, and therefore 
you have wisdom sufficient.' But concerning the arraingment and the 
particulars such as I have set down, I think my Reverend friend may 
know and learn the certainty of them, better than I can report, by some 
of the Sheriff's men who were both at the beginning and the ending, for 
myself was not there, nor I never heard him make repetition of it, and so 
I will say no more of that." 

We may here break off the narrative for a few observations. At 
this wretched travesty of a trial, the like of which was only too 
familiar to the indignant, broken hearts of contemporary English Catho- 
lics, William Napier was present. After hearing his brother's sentence, 
he " made the greatest interest," as the phrase went, to get him a 
reprieve, and he never rested until he had obtained it. Probably 
our martyr would have been reprieved and banished, had it not 
been for the interference of the Vice-Chancellor of the University. 
This was that Dr. John King of Christ Church, who afterwards became 
Bishop of London. As bishop, he took a prominent part in the trial 
and condemnation of the venerable martyr, John Almond, in 1612. It 
is said that he not only mourned for this crime as long as he lived, but 
that he was actually granted the grace, so seldom given to persecutors, 
to become himself a Catholic, and to die in the communion of that 
Church which he had so cruelly persecuted.* Like Saul of Tarsus he 
had the blood of more than one martyr on his hands, and we may 
hope that the Catholic tradition of his conversion is an authentic one. 
Dr. King's portrait still hangs in the splendid Hall of Christ Church. 

It was hoped, almost up to the last, that our martyr's life would be 
spared. There is a letter of November 2, i6ro, signed by the Rev. 
George Lambton, now in the Archives of the old Clergy Brotherhood in 
London, which refers to him as follows : " Our miseries are daily 
multiplied. Divers priests have been banished of late and now more 
are apprehended. . . . We hope for all this that God will give us 
patience to bear these afflictions, and strength to pass through such 
terrible wars. Your old friend, Mr. George Napper, lieth in Oxford 
Gaol, condemned but reprieved, and might have escaped for taking the 
Oath. It is thought he shall be banished." f A week later, and our 
martyr passed through the last fiery trial to his crown. 

To continue the narrative : " There was a poor fellow that was con- 

* Challoner, Memoirs, Sec. (Derby, 1843), vol. ii. See The Bishop of London's Legacy, 
a book put out at the time of Dr. King's death in 1621. The rumour as to his conversion 
is not widely credited. 

f Foley, Record; English Province S.J., series x. part i. p. 391. 
164 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

demned for felony (his name was Falkner) and the poor man took great 
care to die as a good Christian, and whether it were God Almighty's 
extraordinary goodness, as I am persuaded it was, to put him in mind to 
come to the blessed man for his ghostly comfort and help, or whether 
some good-minded man willed him to go to him for help, I know not. 
But to him he went and requested his charitable help to save his soul, 
and he most lovingly received him and brought him into the state of 
grace, and so the poor creature made it known that he died as a good 
Christian man ought to die, which confession of his made divers mali- 
cious ministers fret against the blessed man ; and some of them, as it was 
reported, rode presently to Abingdon to the judges and told them what 
the poor man had confessed at the gallows, and entreated them that the 
good man might be executed out of the way, or else he would do great 
harm. And this being given to understand to the blessed man, he con- 
stantly thanked Almighty God that he had done so good a deed, and 
said if the judges would come unto him, he would do as much for them, 
for he came into the country to exercise his functions, and to save men's 
souls ; and this much he told me himself. 

"But shortly after Justice Croke sent his warrant or his letter that he 
should be executed, but the High Sheriff thought his letter not sufficient, 
being reprieved, and so stayed the execution, and when that Justice Croke 
returned home, all his service being ended, he sent another warrant or 
letter to the High Sheriff again that he should be executed ; and yet the 
Sheriff would not do it. Between these two (as I remember) the High 
Sheriff and Mr. Chancellor sent for that blessed man to come to Christ 
Church. There he was examined about the poor man, his recon- 
cilation and by whom it proceeded ; the blessed man answered that 
being condemned and both put together, as the order of the Castle is, 
the poor man of his own voluntary forwardness beseeched him to give 
his counsel how he might die a good Christian, for he said that he had 
lived a very bad and lewd life a long time, not knowing the true way 
how he should carry himself, and therefore he craved his help at that 
instant. The blessed man received him most willingly into the bosom 
of his Mother the Catholic Church ; and he desired the Vice-Chancellor 
not to charge any other man with it. For there was a prisoner in the 
house whose name I know not, that was brought in to be an instru- 
ment in the business. The Vice-Chancellor asked him if he would 
take the oath of allegiance ; he answered he would so far as it 
concerned [temporal] affairs and yielded unto his Majesty as much 
power and authority as ever any king had heretofore, or of right 
ought to have ; but that would not prevail unless he would take it as 
it [is] appointed in the book. And if he would take it, so they would 

165 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

promise his life should be saved. But he answered that he could not 
nor would not. 

" Then they persuaded him to read Mr. Blackwell's book concerning 
the oath, and then to consider of it, and with much persuasion he took 
the book and promised he would ; and so he told me himself he did read 
it, but would not take the oath for all that. And as I think he told me, 
he sent the Vice-Chancellor a draft of [it] that he would take if it would 
please him to accept of it ; but they would accept of no other form but 
that which was set down by the Act of Parliament, for they sent him 
word they could not. And then his friends caused a petition to be 
delivered to his Majesty for his life by the hands of a sister of his, Mrs. 
Gunwell, who delivered it, and also a pheasant hen, which petition the King 
received (and the pheasant also) and willed the poor gentlewoman should 
have an angel, but she had never a penny ; and he promised he would 
consider of the petition, but it was to no purpose, as the event followed. 

"After all this Judge Croke coming up to London to the term, went 
to make an end and to send him to eternal glory, and to that end sent 
down his warrant with the copy of his indictment and all other things 
belonging to the order of law, that he should die by the gth day of 
November. This warrant being come down, a dear friend of his sent 
him word of it, that he should prepare himself to die, for there was no 
other hope. The blessed man received this [message ?] most lovingly, 
not being appalled at it ; and so desired his friend to pray for him that 
he might be constant and valiant to the end ; for he thanked God he 
he found no fear in himself. This warrant being known, it caused one 
of his nephews to post up to London, who procured Colonel Cecil to go 
to Justice Croke for a reprieve ; and with much ado he procured it for 
one day longer ; which was the loth of November ; and in the meantime 
he should confer with some learned men, and that they should certify his 
good behaviour. 

" The Vice-Chancellor and divers others at that time being at London 
about the election of [the] Chancellor, and Doctor Hamon being at home, 
was willed to do him what pleasure he could ; and before the tenth day 
the Vice-Chancellor did come home, and another of his nephews went 
unto him, and delivered the commendations, which was commendable ; 
but he made light of it, and said if he would take the oath of allegiance 
he would do what he could to save him ; otherwise he would not do 
anything. And when these that were at London had intelligence how 
all things passed, they laboured further for a pardon. But as matters 
were handled, it came too late : for those which bent themselves to be 
his most enemies, proved to be his best friends. For myself is, and was, 
of that opinion that it was Almighty God's pleasure that he should now 
1 66 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

come to receive his wages, or rather, a crown of glory for working in His 
vineyard. 

" His friends this time marvelled they could not hear from London 
whether he should die or live ; and Thursday being coming we thought 
to have received some news by letters, what the blessed man should 
certainly trust to. And that Thursday, at night, he caused a breast of 
mutton to be roasted, and willed a couple of poorer Catholic men to be 
at supper with him, and so they did. And the same Thursday, there 
was a good man * had sent a very great present to him and myself, to 
be merry together, giving us to understand that by God's grace he would 
sup with us that night, which news caused Mr. Napper to rejoice much, 
for he took great care to speak with one. And truly this is to be noted, 
that every time that it was given out that he should die, it pleased God 
that a good man unlocked for came unto him ; and [as it is reported] 
one of them which was with him but four days before he suffered, is now 
gone to heaven unto him. f Little did he eat that supper, only a piece 
of pigeon-pie, and after, a few stewed prunes which one of his sisters 
had brought him. 

" Very merry he was that evening ; and being at supper, I said unto 
him, ' Mr. Napper, if it be God's holy will that you shall suffer, I do 
wish with all my heart that it might be to-morrow, being Friday ' ; and 
[I] said that ' our Saviour did eat the Paschal Lamb with His disciples 
on Thursday at night, and suffered the Friday following, and therefore I 
do wish, if you must die, that it might be to-morrow." He answered 
me very sweetly, saying, ' Welcome be God's grace, and I pray God 
that I may be constant ' : praying us all to pray for him. 

" And thus much I must let you understand that every time he heard 
the news that he should suffer he gave to some poor body which was 
Catholic some of his clothes, and I would say unto him : { Methinks 
you should make reservation of them again, if you do not die ! ' His 
answer was that he had more upon his back than he had brought into 
the world, and ' if I live, I will put myself to God's Providence ' ; and 
truly, if he had lived, he had left himself little more than he brought 
into the world, for he had given all away. After supper he and the 
other good man drew themselves to a secret place, to confer upon some 
essential matter ; and when they had made an end, they took their 
leave the one of the other, and so did all the company, every man to his 
chamber. 

* i.e. a priest. 

t Either the Venerable John Roberts, O.S.B., or the Venerable Thomas Somers, who 
were martyred at Tyburn, December 10, 1610. 
t i.e. to make his confession. 

I6 7 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

" The next day being Friday, 9th of November, about nine of the clock 
in the morning, the Under-Sheriff sent to the keeper's wife to tell Mr. 
Napper that he should prepare himself to die, for that was the day, 
between one and two in the afternoon, that he should be executed. The 
poor woman took it very grievously, and fell a-crying coming to me, 
who hearing her, marvelled what the matter should be, and asked her 
what the matter was : who answered me, crying : ' Oh, the blessed man 
must die this day, and I cannot find [it] in my heart to tell him of it ! ' 
I answered her : ' Welcome God's grace, for now I am sure it is God's 
blessed will to have it so ; and therefore I will go tell him myself and let 
him understand of it.' So I went to his chamber, knocking at the door. 
He opened it ; I saluted him, and asked him how he did ; he answered 
me : ' Well, I thank Jesus.' 1 asked him how he had slept that night, 
and he said 'Very well, I thank God.' Then I said unto him that the 
bell had tolled and rung out also. He asked me what I meant by those 
speeches ? I said to him that now he must put on his armour of proof, 
for he must fight that day a great battle. He took me in his arms and 
embraced me, and said it was the best news that ever was brought unto 
him, and I was most welcome for declaring it unto him, saying further 
that he found himself thoroughly scoured from all the rust which had 
troubled him long before, [and thereat] * he rejoiced very much, and asked 
me if he might not serve God f that day ? I said the day was far spent, 
but if it pleased him I would make all things ready, and he prayed me 
that I would. 

" So he was ready ; and surely methought he did consecrate that day 
as reverently in all his actions, and with as much sweet behaviour as 
ever I did see him in all my life, for I did especially note him ; and he 
showed not fear in any respect. When he had made an end and all 
things laid aside, he fell to his devotions, and by the end of our service 
many scholars were coming to the Castle yard and into the Court ; and 
after he had prayed above an hour, I came to him and asked if I should 
send for some comfortable thing for him to drink. He answered, no, 
he would neither eat nor drink, hoping in his Saviour that he should 
have a sumptuous banquet, and shortly. 

" After a little stay, I considered that the time drew somewhat near ; 
I came to him again, and put [him] in mind of shifting him with a fair 
shirt. He said he would willingly. Then I made him a fire, and 
warmed his shirt. And coming to him again to put it on, he made a 
step down among the poor prisoners, and did distribute certain money 
amongst them. Coming up again, he brought a piece of silver of half 
a crown, with a little money besides ; he laid it in my chamber window. 

* Conjectural : Corner of page missing. -f i.e. say Mass. 

1 68 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

I asked him what he would do with that piece of silver having the picture 
of St. George ? And he told me he would give it to the executioner for 
his pains, and the rest he would give to some poor people ; and so he did. 

" When he had put on his clean shirt he fell to his prayers again. He 
had prayed but a small time when came two scholars, Masters of Art, 
and I think one of them was a minister. They began to offer some 
speeches to him concerning the oath of allegiance. He prayed them to 
give him leave to prepare himself, for he had not long to stay, and it stood 
him upon to call to mind all his reckonings which he was to make 
to his Lord and Master, and therefore, with most mild and sweet words, 
entreated them not to trouble him ; and they, like honest-minded men, 
stayed their speeches, seeming they were sorry for him. Then the 
Pro-Proctor coming to the Castle to speak with him (for both the 
Proctors were gone to London), and the Vice-Chancellor, he sent the 
keeper to bring Mr. Napper to him, who stayed in the keeper's chamber, 
with divers other scholars. The blessed man being coming to him, 
he began to use some speeches to persuade him to take the oath ; but 
the good man prayed him to give him leave to spend that little time 
which was lent him in prayer ; so knelt down at a table and prayed a 
little. 

" But by that time the Under-Sheriff willed him to make haste, for all 
things were ready to the execution. Then he rose up and went into a 
little chamber by, put off his doublet and woollen breeches and his boot- 
hose, and put him on a white waistcoat and pair of white linen breeches, 
a pair of white stockings, a pair of shoes, and borrowed the keeper's 
gown (to save his own from the hangman), and being apparelled to the end 
that the law had appointed, he came again to the keeper's chamber. And 
I, meeting my keeper, he asked me if I had taken leave of him ? I answered 
him I would willingly see him again, [and]* so I went with him up into his 
chamber, and as I was coming the * [blessjed man was about to kneel down, 
and seeing me he stayed, and I pressed down through the scholars and 
came unto him and knelt down. He blessed me ; rising up, he embraced 
me and kissed me. 

" The Proctor asked what I was. I heard one answer him that I was 
a gentleman, and a prisoner for my conscience. And then the blessed 
man began to kneel down, and the Proctor said : ' Mr. Napper, shall 1 
pray with you ? ' And he answered him thus : ' Good Mr. Proctor, you 
and I are not of one religion, therefore may not pray together.' The 
Proctor said : ' Shall I pray for you ? ' The blessed man said : ' I 
would to God you were in state of grace to pray for me.' Then he 
knelt down, and I knelt by him the space of saying a Pater noster. 

* Corner of page gone. 
V 169 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Presently the Under-Sheriff called very earnestly to come away, and so, 
[he] prostrating himself to the ground, kissed it, and made the sign of the 
Cross, and went forward to go to the dungeon door, where the hurdle stayed 
for him, and coming by the Proctor, he said : ' Mr. Napper, if you will 
yet take the oath of allegiance, I make no doubt of your life.' He said : 
' Good Mr. Proctor, do not wrong me when I am [sic] gone, for I know 
many speeches will go of me ; and now I say again unto you that I have 
prayed most heartily for the King, the Prince, and all his children, as 
any subject he hath in the world, and will yield him as much power and 
authority as ever any Prince had, or ought to have.' 

" Then the hangman came and asked him forgiveness. The blessed 
man embraced him and said : ' T most lovingly forgive thee, and for a 
pledge I have willed one of the Sheriff's men to give thee a piece of 
silver.' The hangman said he had it and thanked him for it ; and so, 
being called for again, went down to the stairfoot ; the door being opened, 
I followed him. And he, seeing the hurdle there, laid himself down 
upon it, and with a most lively courage blessed himself, and had not so 
much as thread to bind himself with ; I think never any but was bound 
but himself. When they offered to draw forward, one of the 
[pieces ?] of the trace broke, so they stayed until it was made fast again ; 
and the people were so unreasonable in pressing themselves to see him, 
that they pressed me downwards upon the hurdle ; then I called to the 
Proctor to command the people to give back, and I took both his hands 
in mine, and I prayed God to comfort him. He looked upon me and 
prayed God to bless me, and with much [ado] I got from the throng of 
the people ; and more than this I cannot set down of my own know- 
ledge. 

" And this that now is to write, is the report of Mr. Charles, his own 
hearing at the place where he suffered his martyrdom. [What follows 
is in the same hand.] 

" The 9th of November being Friday, 1 6 1 o, it pleased God to appoint 
the time in the which Mr. George Napper, priest, was to be tried in the 
furnace. Being brought out of prison, laid upon a hurdle, with his 
hands conjoined a[nd his] * eyes fixed towards heaven, without moving 
any way, he was drawn to the place of execution where, being took off 
and set on his feet, beholding, the place where he was to suffer, he 
signed himself with the sign of the Cross, and advisedly began to speak 
as followeth : ' Gentlemen, you must expect no great speech at my 
hands, for indeed I intend none : only I acknowledge myself to be a 
most miserable sinner.' And therewithal, joining his hands together 
with an intent to pray, was interrupted by a minister who said unto 

* Corner of page gone. 
170 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

him, ' Mr. Napper, confess your treason.' Wherewith bending him- 
self towards him, he said : ' Treason, Sir ? I thank God I never* knew 
what treason meant.' To the which the minister answered, ' Be advised 
what you say. Do you not remember what the Judge told you, that it 
was treason to be a priest ? ' ' For that I die, Sir ; and that Judge 
that condemned me, as well as I, shall appear before the Just Judge of 
Heaven to whom I appeal.' 

" Then again turning to the people he said : ' I confess I am a 
Catholic priest, and withal protest that none but Catholics could be 
saved.' 

" After these words, he desired he might have leave to pray. Where- 
unto the minister replied, ' Pray for the King now.' With that he 
lifted up his hands and said : ' I pray God bless his Majesty and make 
him a blessed saint in Heaven.' Then he desired the company that he 
might pray to himself. The minister interrupted him the third time 
and said : ' Go to : pray, and we will pray with you.' To which he 
answered and said : ' Sir, I will have none of your prayers ; neither it is 
my will that you should pray with me. But I desire all good Catholics 
to join with me in prayer.' 

"And [he] addressed himself to pray and said : ' In te Domine 
speravi, non confundar,' etc., then lifted up his hands and heart and 
said the psalm ' De Profundis ' ; after that, ' Beati quorum remissae 
sunt ' ; lastly the psalm ' Miserere.' These being ended he plucked 
down his nightcap over his eyes and the most part of his face, and often 
repeated these words : ' In manus tuas, Domine, commendo spiritum 
meum ' ; and yielding himself to one side of the ladder, having his 
hands still enjoined, he being turned off, he struck himself three times 
on the breast, and yielded his blessed soul to Him that gave it to him, 
showing yet a perfect memory was joined with a constant resolution.* 

" Thus, beseeching God to defend you from your enemies, I must 
humbly desire you to remember me in your prayers. 

"From my cell, this I9th day of December, 1610. 

" His charity was great, for if any poor prisoner wanted other meat 
to fill him or clothes to cover him, he would rather be cold himself than 

* We do not know, unhappily, the exact spot chosen for the martyrdom. At that 
time, very much more remained of the great Norman Castle than outlasted the Civil Wars ; 
and from the gaol to the gallows was a considerable journey. On Wood's authority, we 
may accept the place of execution as that immediately connected with the Castle, perhaps 
in the great enclosure itself, perhaps in Broken Hayes across the road, along the line of 
what is now George Street and its northern boundaries. Otherwise it might well seem 
as if, by a refinement of cruelty exceedingly common in Elizabethan and Jacobean days, 
the martyrdom was consummated on the green at Holywell, in sight of the Napier home. 

I/I 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

they should ; if any would pray him to give his word to the keeper for 
them Vie would do it, if he paid it himself, as sometimes he did, and 
he would write for the poorest prisoner in the house. There was one 
wretch went away with twenty shillings and ninepence of his, promising 
him he would send it to him honestly, but he never heard of him. 
Another he lent his cloak to wear a days to keep him warm, and hath 
willed that as long as he stay in the gaol he must wear it, which I fear 
me will be so long that he will wear that out and such another. And 
thus beseeching you once more of your prayers, I in all duty com- 
mend me." * 

And thus the tragedy was consummated, and George Napier of 
Corpus entered into the joy of his Lord. 

There is but little to add to the beautiful story that we have quoted, 
save some fragments from other writers which we insert, " that nothing 
be lost." A paper, preserved at Stonyhurst by the Jesuit Father 
Coffin f gives a few details. At his first apprehension he was thrown 
into the Bocardo prison, where for some days the " venerable old man 
was scarcely kept alive on a little bread and water. Here, in spite of 
great weakness, he had to hold daily disputations with eager graduates 
and undergraduates, who flocked to the prison, hoping to refute and 
convince him. But he addressed to them such fervent exhortations 
that they were silenced, and not a few converted. 

The Bocardo prison was over the North Gate of the City, next the 
Church of St. Michael. It was famous as the place where Cranmer, 
Ridley and Latimer had been confined. For this reason, the old 
door of the prison is now kept as a relic in the Church of St. Mary 
Magdalen, hard by. Father Coffin also gives a long speech in which the 
martyr comforted his weeping sister, and so animated her with his own 
supernatural joy, that, like another Scholastica, she would fain have 
spent the whole night before the martyrdom in hearing him discourse 
upon the joys of heaven. He tells us, too, that when the martyr 
addressed the people at the gibbet, many Protestants, as well as the 
Catholics, were seen to weep, which much annoyed those in charge of 
the execution. The crowd interfered to prevent them cutting the rope 
before the martyr had breathed his last, and some of the lower people, 
thrusting themselves through the- guards, rendered the dying man what 
they thought to be an act of charity. Thus they hung on his feet and 
dragged them down and struck him on the breast, and so on, moved by 
a zeal not altogether according to knowledge, with the intention of 
making his death more swift and easy. It is at least a comfort to know 

* Here there follows yet another postscript, which we postpone till its proper place in 
our story. f Anglia> iii. n. 103, f. 207. 

172 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

that the cruel butchery that followed was not carried out upon a living 
breathing man. 

Father Coffin adds that he was about to close his letter, when " Our 
Father Rector " came into the room, and told him some more wonderful 
things about the holy martyr. These the Archpriest had himself written 
to tell the Holy Father, and the rector had heard of them from Cardinal 
Blanchetti. 

He then goes on to narrate, on this excellent authority, that after the 
martyr's quarters were exposed on the city gates, a bright star appeared 
for some days above one of them, and when this same limb fell by some 
chance to the ground, at once a spring of most pure water burst out on this 
very spot, which ran as a sparkling rivulet through the streets of the 
city, and caused wonder to all who saw it. This sentiment was greatly 
increased by a miracle that followed. A blind man, hearing of this 
spring, full of faith and trust in the martyr's intercession, caused his 
guide to lead him in haste to the spot, where he washed his eyes, and at 
once recovered his sight. 

At this the heretics were filled with fury, and proceeded to choke the 
spring with mud, but the waters broke out again. A second time they 
stopped it up, but once more it burst through the obstruction. The 
third time they were determined not to be beaten, and so rammed it down 
with clay and rubble that they succeeded in closing it. 

It is also in a postscript that the anonymous writer, whose account of 
the martyr's last days we have transcribed, treats of these wonders. We 
have purposely postponed these closing paragraphs of his narrative until 
now. 

" Since his death he appeared to one who saluted him by his own 
name, ' Mr. George Napper ' ; who answered him, ' Not now George 
Napper, but Rex in magna gloria? * 

" Again, in Lent last, there brake out water under that forequarter of 
his which was set up on a pole at the South Gate in Oxford, which is hard 
by Christ Church ; by the virtue of which water some thought themselves 
to have help (I [keep back] f their names, lest they should have trouble 
from it), so that many went to take of it, and it [was] now so famous 
that it [was] called Mr. Napper Well, and it seemed that the fingers of 
his hand pointed to the said water. 

" Whereupon the Vice-Chancellor, Dr. King, returning from 
London, caused that quarter to be secretly taken down and cast into 
the Thames, and the well spring to be rammed up." J 

* " A King in great glory." 

f The words within square brackets are not clear, but this is evidently the sense. 

j From the copy in the Westminster Archives. 

173 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

"... Mr. Hunt used to mention one Mr. Knapier (of the family 
of Knapier of Holywell) that was hanged and quartered in Queen 
Elizabeth's time, and one of his quarters being put up upon some place 
in the city of Oxford, under it there sprang up a fountain, which so vexed 
several of the principal men of the city that they took it down and threw 
it into the Thames. 

"A miller of Sandford one morning seeing it, acquainted Mr. 
Powell's great-grandmother with it, who had it taken up and buried in 
the chapel (now a barn) on the south side of Sandford old Mansion 
House." * 

The writer of the narrative does not tell us (perhaps he thought 
it would not be safe) what happened to the rest of the sacred body. 
But, happily, Anthony Wood has supplied this omission. Here is his 
touching story : 

" The next day [after George Napier's martyrdom] his head and 
quarters were set upon the four gates of the City, and upon that great 
one belonging to Christ Church, next to St. Aldate's Church, to the 
great terror of the Catholics that were in and near Oxford. f 

" He was much pitied for that his grey hairs should come to such an 
end, and lamented by many that such rigour should be shown on an 
innocent and harmless person. No great danger in him (God wot), and 
therefore not to be feared, but being a Seminary [priest], and the laws 
against them now strictly observed, an example to the rest must be 
shewed. Some, if not all, of his quarters, were afterwards conveyed 
away by stealth, and buried at Sandford, near Oxford, in the old chapel 
there, joining to the Manor House, sometime belonging to the Knights 
Templars." J 

The present writer will not easily forget with what delight he came 
across this passage, some years ago, in good old Anthony Wood. Till 
then, he had no idea that the sacred relics of this great son and martyr 
of Oxford had been preserved for the veneration of posterity. 

Nor was he satisfied till he had made pilgrimage to Sandford, and 
visited the sacred spot where the mangled limbs were laid. 

The City gates have all disappeared, and even Tom Gate has been 

* From Hearne's Collections, Oxford Hist. Soc. vol. viii. p. 45 (A.D. 1723-24). 

f It was the head that was placed oh Tom Gate (not on Christ Church steeple, as 
Challoner says). The South Gate stood across St. Aldate's, between Christ Church and 
the old Almshouses, now the house of the chaplain to the Catholic undergraduates, 
Monsignor Kennard. 

I History and Antiquities of the University (Oxford, 1796), vol. ii. p. 166. 

They were the North, or Bocardo Gate, the South Gate by Christ Church, the East 
Gate near Magdalen College, and the West Gate (or Water Gate) by St. Ebbe's Church. 
There are illustrations of them in Skelton's Antiquities of Oxford. 

'74 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

altered almost out of recognition by Wren's stately additions, for it had 
remained till then in the unfinished state in which Wolsey left it. But, 
happily, Sandford Chapel remains, though degraded to the uses of a 
barn. 

How long the sacred relics remained exposed in rain and sun, for 
the birds of the air to devour, we do not know. It seems, however, 




from the old writer's mention of " last Lent," that they, must have 
been left there for some months at least. 

Perhaps, when the martyr's arm, on the South Gate, was taken down 
and thrown into the river, the Napiers felt that an effort must be made 
to preserve the rest of those sacred limbs from further desecration. 

It was William Napier, we may be sure, who, with heart-broken but 
subdued sorrow, carried his sainted brother to his rest on the quiet acres 
of the Powells ; perhaps by water, so that a walk from Christ Church to 
Sandford Lock by the tow-path may become for us a veritable pilgrimage 
in his wake. 

Our picture shows the present house across the river. The old 
chapel is seen on the right, looking what it is now, a barn. The house 
has been entirely rebuilt in our own time by Magdalen College, to which 
the estate now belongs. The large walled garden is seen on the left. 
Though the house is modern, much of the old materials have been used, 

175 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

and the house is well built in the Elizabethan style. Within, the great 
oak beams that support the ceilings date from the time of the Powells, 
and every vestige of antiquity that could be preserved has been incor- 
porated with the modern building. 

The place is thus described in c/f Quide to the ^Architectural ^Antiquities 
in the Neighbourhood of Oxford* 

" The farmhouse, in a field on the north-west side of the Church, 
has usually been looked upon as the remains of the old preceptory of 
the Knights Templars in this place, but the only ancient parts of it are 
some slight traces of early English work in what was formerly the chapel. 
These consist of a portion of the east window, and a roll-moulded 
string-course. The doorway is much later, of Perpendicular character. 
The chapel was dedicated to St. Mary the Virgin. . . . 

"In the garden is a gateway bearing the date 1614, on each side of 
which there are fragments of architectural ornaments built into the wall, 
and among them a reversed shield of late date, having carved on it a cross 
pattee, the badge of the Knights Templars, and also of their successors, 
the Knights Hospitallers of St. John of Jerusalem." 

The preceptory was moved to Sandford from Temple Cowley about 
the year 1274. 

In 1542, soon after the Dissolution, this house of the Knights 
Hospitallers was granted to Edward Powell, whose descendant, Winifred, 
Lady Curzon, alienated it in the year 1760. 

On June 29, 1661, the antiquary, Anthony Wood, made a visit to 
Sandford, then the seat of Mr. John Powell, which he thus noted : 

" Mr. Francis Napier of Holywell and myself walked over to 
Sandford, two miles distant from Oxon, where we saw the ruins of an 
old priory and a chapel there adjoining. . . . This house at the Disso- 
lution came to the Powells, who enjoy it to this day." The antiquary 
then proceeds to note coats of arms of the family and their alliances, 
which he found in a window of the hall. 

Francis Napier, who accompanied Anthony W r ood, was the great- 
nephew of our martyr, being the sixth son of Edmund, William Napier's 
son and heir. He was a great friend of Wood's, who often mentions 
walking with him. He was born in 1623, and died a bachelor in the 
house of his grandfather Wakeman, at Beckford in Gloucestershire. 
No doubt it was he who told his friend the antiquary the touching story 
of his martyred uncle, and of the translation of his relics to Sandford, 
and we can see from Wood's account how much the story moved him.f 

* Parker, 1846. 

t Mr. Gillow is mistaken in saying that Francis became a Franciscan (Cath. Record 
Socy., vol. i. p. 135). It was Charles, the youngest brother, born in 1631, who died at 
176 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

It is probably only the eastern part of the barn which really forms 
a part of the old chapel. The early English window is now walled up, 
and the upper part of it, as well as of the wall, has disappeared, and is 
replaced by boarding. The old fifteenth-century doorway on the south 
side fortunately still remains intact, with its door, and we give an illustra- 
tion of this precious relic. (See facing p. 206.) 

When we visited the place, and begged to inspect the interior of the 
barn, we were kindly welcomed by the present occupiers. Standing by 
the old doorway, through which the mutilated body of the martyr had 
been carried nearly three centuries before, we found ourselves in a huge 
barn filled with waggons, farm implements, and the like. The eastern 
end, however, with its walled-up window, was happily free. We asked 
the man who showed it us, and who seemed to be a native of the place, 
if he had ever heard of any one being buried here. " Why yes, sir," he 
said, " there's a man lies here who was hanged, drawn, and quartered." 
" Do you know why he was executed ? " " Well, sir, they say it was 
because he was a priest." " And is it known exactly where he lies ? " 
"Yes, sir, just below where you stand, in front of where the altar was, 
on a line with the doorway by which you came in. There have been 
Roman Catholics here to visit the place, and there were many who 
wanted to dig to find the body, but my father's old master, sir, he always 
used to say, ' Leave him there in peace ; he has been there all these 
hundred years, let him rest in peace.' " * 

It was consoling to find that the tradition of the martyr's resting- 
place was not lost. Edmund Powell, his brother-in-law, still lived at 
Sandford when the sacred remains were brought there, and we like to 
think that the beautiful gateway in the garden may have been raised as 
a sort of triumphal archway in commemoration of the martyr's coming 
home. 

The sacred burden was doubtless carried up from the river-side, 
through this sweet enclosed garden, to the ancient Chapel of Our Lady, 
and as the faithful sons of the house went out to meet it and escort it in 
procession with flaming torches to its last resting-place, they may well 
have thought that there should be some memorial of the passage of the 
King Rex in magna gloria, who had thus come to honour their home 

Holt, County Leicester, in 1678. He took the name of Francis in religion, hence the 
confusion. Cf. Wood, Life and Times, vol i. (in a pedigree). 

* Since this was written, it has come to the knowledge of the writer that search has 
been made by Catholics in this very spot, but without any result. Though two perfect 
skeletons were found, the quarters of our martyr could not be discovered. It therefore 
seems probable that when the Powell family left Sandford they translated these precious 
relics elsewhere. Perhaps they were taken abroad. In any case it would seem certain 
that they are no longer at Sandford. 

z 177 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

with his presence. And so, a few years later, the gateway was built and 
the date inscribed above it as a perpetual memorial to his passing, to 
whom no more direct memorial could safely be reared. 

No doubt, at that delayed funeral, one of the " good men " who had 
been so assiduous in visiting the martyr in his dungeon, was there to 
offer the Holy Sacrifice over his sacred remains. And many another 
secret Mass must have been offered there, through that long dark night 
of our Church's sorrow, in honour of the martyr and the Martyr's 
King. And among the priests who offered there must often have 
been found the Franciscan brothers, William and Charles Napier, of 
Holywell. 

The little Norman Church, close to the old preceptory, though 
almost rebuilt, contains one precious relic of the ages of faith, which 
was found buried in the churchyard in 1723. This is an exquisite 
carving in alabaster, representing the Assumption of Our Blessed Lady. 
The figure of the Mother of God, crowned and vested in royal raiment, 
is surrounded with a vesica of rays, and supported by six angels. Below 
her feet are two smaller angels, kneeling, and supporting between them 
a reliquary, now broken and empty. This beautiful memorial of the 
piety of our forefathers was, on its discovery, placed with praiseworthy 
liberality within the Church and attached to the south wall of the 
chancel, where it may yet be seen. No doubt it owes its preservation 
to the influence of the Powell family. 

But we must leave Sandford and return to Holywell. If we do not 
cross the river, we may return by Littlemore, which will be for ever 
associated with the memory of the greatest of all Oxford Catholics, John 
Henry Newman. The Mynchery, that old monastery which he so greatly 
loved to contemplate from his hermitage, or to visit on his daily walk, 
also belonged to the Powells. And it is a consolation to mount the 
hill from Sandford to Littlemore, and to reflect that " the winter of our 
discontent " is past, and that we have lived to see the blossoming of the 
second spring. For the seed which fell into the earth and died has 
surely brought forth great fruit. 

It would be interesting to follow the fortunes of the dear old house 
at Holywell and of the Napier family in detail, but we can only do so 
briefly. William Napier survived his martyred brother some eleven 
years, dying in 1621. His heir, Edmund, then forty-three years old, 
reigned in his stead. He left behind him a folio commonplace book 
in which he noted the family births and deaths, and inserted copies of 
the various leases held by the Napiers from an early date. The book 
was the gift of his brother Christopher. It is now in the possession of 
Mr. Joseph Gillow, who edited the Family Register from it for the 
178 





u 

Q 

^"S 

^/ 

w 

H 

^1 



2 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

Catholic Record Society in 1905.* This has naturally been or the 
greatest service to the present writer. 

It is touching to read the prayers which good Mr. Edmund Napier 
writes after the record of the birth "of each of his children : " God make 
him his servant," " Sit sibi corde servire Deo, del illi deus de rare cceli et 
benedicat '," and so on, he writes, evidently with a full heart. In 1643 
he had to suffer a cruel blow ; within three days (July 1 2th and I4th) both 
the wife of his bosom and his eldest surviving son Edward were taken 
from him. An epidemic was raging at Oxford, and no doubt these two 
precious lives were among the victims. King Charles I. was holding 
the University city and keeping his court there in this first year of the 
Civil Wars, when what was called "the camp fever" broke out and 
swept away a whole company of his most devoted adherents, the poet 
Cartwright among them. Edmund Napier seems to have thought that 
he could not long survive his loved ones, and within a week of the 
double funeral in Holywell Church, he made his own will. The death 
of his heir (who was in his thirtieth year) no doubt also made this 
necessary. 

The will,f which begins in the usual pious fashion, " In the name of 
God, Amen," is dated July 22, 1643. The testator leaves " my lease of 
the farm of Holliwell " and all his Oxfordshire estates, except one at 
Wolvercote, to his son George and his heirs, with annuities to his 
younger sons William, Edmund, and Charles. William and Charles, as 
we have seen, were Franciscans. Edmund tried his vocation among 
the Jesuits, and after failing there, sought to become a secular priest, 
and entered at the English College in Rome in 1652 ; but in 1656 he 
had to be dispensed from the missionary oath for the same reasons of 
ill-health which had driven him from the noviciate, and he returned to 
Oxford, where he married, and lived as "a Popish schoolmaster in the 
parish of St. Mary Magdalen." J He lived in a house which is now 
part of Nos. 63 and 64 St. Giles's, and dying in 1685 was buried with 
his ancestors in Holywell Church. Mr. Napier, however, survived his 
wife for nearly twelve years. He lived to see two-thirds of his property 
sequestrated, under the Commonwealth, for recusancy, and died Feb- 
ruary 26, 1654, aged seventy-five. He was buried in the chancel of 
Holywell Church, and his son George succeeded him. He had married, 
during his father's lifetime, Margaret, heiress to Mr. Arden of Kirtlington, 
who brought him a considerable fortune, but gave him no son, so that, 

* Miscellanea, vol. i. pp. 133-37. 

f It is in the British Museum, Add. MSS. 34,679, f. 746. 
J Wood, Life and Times, vol. i. p. 193, and vol. iii. p. 124. 
Stapleton, of. cit. p. 214-15. 

179 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

when he died in 1671, the Napiers of Holywell were represented by 
three girls Margaret, Mary and Frances, of whom the eldest was 
twenty-two. She married Mr. Henry Nevill of Nevill Holt, in Leicester- 
shire, and took with her the family estates. 

The last male survivor of the Napiers of Holywell was George's 
brother William, known as Father Marianus Russell, the Friar Minor. 
In him the family ended gloriously, for, as we have seen, he was a 
notable confessor of the Faith. Born in 1619, he left for Douay on 
June 14, 1630. Russell, the alias he assumed, according to the universal 
custom of the students of that famous College, was the name of his 
great-great-grandmother. Nine years later he entered the English 
Franciscan Convent of St. Bonaventure's at Douay, and took the 
name of Marianus. Professed in 1 640, he was approved for preaching 
and hearing confessions in 1650. He was Confessor to the English 
Poor Clares at Aire, from 1651-1656, when he was sent on the English 
Mission. He was titular Guardian of Coventry, 1674-1677 (his younger 
brother, Charles, being titular Guardian of Oxford) ; Rector of Mount 
Grace in Yorkshire in 1675 and 1676, and Chaplain to the Spanish 
Embassy in London in 1678. It was the year of national madness, the 
year of Titus Oates's colossal lie. In the memorable True and Exact 
Narration of the Horrible Plot and Conspiracy of the Popish Party, now 
preserved in the Public Record Office, Article Ixxii. purports to be a 
Papal Bull, shown to Gates by Father Blundell, containing a prospective 
list of dignitaries in England, that England in which his Sacred Majesty 
and the Protestant Religion shall have been done away with by Popish 
plotters. In this document " Napper, a Franciscan Friar," is set down 
over against the Bishopric of Norwich ! 

Therefore the innocent Franciscan was, on January 17, 1679, indicted 
for treason at the Old Bailey. Once more, during that unquiet century, 
a man of his lineage had the chance to confess before an English court the 
Catholic Faith of Christ. But the joy of martyrdom, once given to a Napier, 
was now denied. 

The trial was, of course, a farce. Those evil inventors, Gates and 
Prance, were the only persons who could be found to witness against him, 
except Sir William Walter, who had arrested him, and deposed to finding 
vestments in his chamber. Father Napier asked time to prepare some 
defence. Lord Chief Justice Scroggs replied : " The only use you can 
make of time is to repent," and promptly condemned him to death. 
He was returned to gaol ; and the moment public excitement was a trifle 
allayed, King Charles II. proceeded to grant the kinsman of his loyal 
Giffards a reprieve. If we are sure of anything about this complex 
King, we are sure of his personal sympathy for Catholics. If he let them, 
180 



AN OXFORD MARTYR 

innocent as they were, suffer and die through these cruel years of national 
madness, it at least became extremely plain, on occasions, that he hated 
their tormentors, who mastered him. William Marianus Napier was one 
of two Franciscans, and one of thirty priests, thus condemned and 
reprieved, of whom sixteen, then and after, died in prison from ill- 
usage. 

For his own part he did not die, though he was not liberated for 
six years ; and then, in 1684, he went into exile. In exile, at St. 
Bonaventure's Convent, in Douay, on St. Francis's day, October 4, 
1693, he slept in Christ, seventy-four years old. 

And in this son of sweet St. Francis, like his holy father a martyr in 
will, died the last of the Napiers of Holywell. They were marked with 
the cross of the family shield, even to the last. Nor did they forget that 
on that shield were emblazoned also the red roses of martyrdom.* 

But little remains to be told of the fate of the old Manor House, 
which, after the death of George Napier, came, as we have seen, to the 
Nevills of Holt. They did not live there, but it was still inhabited by 
Catholics. In 1686, Wood notes that " an ancient man and one of the 
King [James II. 's] chaplains came to Oxford, and next day visited Obadiah 
Walker [the Catholic Master of University College]. He said Mass at 
Soladin Harding's, by Holywell Church, where all Papists there retired 
to do their devotions by him."f 

Soladin Harding died in 1684, and was succeeded by Thomas Kimber, 
who acted as steward to the Manor under the Nevills. At the Revolu- 
tion, in December 1688, Wood notes that all the Popish houses in Oxford 
had their windows broken by the mob, among them being Kimber's in 
Holywell. 

Mr. Kimber died in 1716, aged eighty-nine, and his son, Thomas, 
in 1725. Old Mr. William Joyner, a convert Fellow of Magdalen, 
lodged with the Kimbers at Holywell ; he was a great friend both of 
Anthony Wood and of Hearne. J He was a man of considerable learning, 
who suffered much for his religion ; he died in 1706, aged eighty-four, 
and is buried under a freestone slab in Holywell churchyard. J He was 
somewhat eccentric, and after his death it was discovered that he had kept 
all his money hidden in the books of his library. 

Holywell, like Sandford, thus remained in Catholic hands till well on 
in the eighteenth century. Alas ! that they do so no longer. 

Hearne has left us a minute and sympathetic account of the 
old house, as it was in his day. Not a trace of any of the antique 
painted glass which he noticed and recorded, is now to be seen. No 

* The arms of Napier of Holywell are, argent, a cross saltire between four roses gules. 
( Life and Times, vol. iii. p. 45. \ Stapleton, op. cit. p. 221. 

181 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

wonder, for in the nineteenth century the place was used, first, as the 
parish workhouse, and then as a public-house known as the Cock-pit, 
from the place where cocks were fought hard by ! Now, at least, it is 
in reverent hands, though we could wish it had been left unspoilt by 
modern additions. 

One piece of glass, noted by Hearne, seems to have a striking 
significance. It was in " a small arched room over the passage to the 
bowling-green," which he takes to have been an oratory. The inscription 
ran : 

" Rcjuiescens accubuit at leo 
fuis suicitavit turn . . . gentes ergo ? " 

He thinks it dated from the time of Henry VIII. This has an evident 
reference to Numbers xxiv. 9, though it differs from the Vulgate text. 
The " Authorised Version " is more like it : " He couched, he lay down 
as a lion, as a great lion ; who shall stir him up ? " 

Now the lion, in mediaeval symbolism, is the emblem of Christ Our 
Lord, and it is possible that this window, of which Hearne saw but a 
fragment, originally contained a representation of the Entombment of our 
Saviour. Whatever it was, the faithful generations who looked upon the 
legend below it, must have applied it in their hearts to the oppressed and 
sacred faith, seemingly driven to bay and wounded to death in the city 
once fragrant above other English cities with religion and loyalty. It gives 
one a strange thrill of comfort, after all the years, to think that the lion 
has slept with open eye ; that Catholicism never really died on this soil ; 
that the English priests of the Society of Jesus who came to our University 
town in the seventeenth century caught up alive the Eucharistic light 
which at Holywell Manor had burned on, feebly but steadily, ever since 
England broke with her merry past and with the Holy See. 



182 







w 

o 

h 



ac 
o 
o 



O 



IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS 

SOME LANCASHIRE TRADITIONS OF 
VENERABLE EDMUND ARROWSMITH, S.J. 

E3ASHIRE, it has been said, is now "a melancholy land, devas- 
tated with its own inner wealth. The roads are worn with 
toil and traffic. The clouds are dull and lowering, shutting 
out the brightness of the sky." That is true for a great 
part of Lancashire, but north of the Ribble the country is still fair 
enough, and not yet made ugly by mill-chimneys and coal-pits. The 
district which is the object of the present pilgrimage lies, indeed, a few 
miles south of the Ribble, but it is still fairly unspoilt ; the hills that 
close in Brindle and Hoghton are well wooded, and the fields that 
encircle the lonely farms and ancient Halls that stud the district are 
still green and fertile. Brindle, in fact, though it lies in the midst of 
a triangle, of which Preston, Blackburn and Chorley form the angles, 
and is thus hemmed in by smoky towns, is even now an oasis in this 
grimy land. 

The Catholic church, plain but commodious, is hidden away in a 
maze of leafy lanes which seems to have been designed to perplex the 
wayfarer, and to conceal the House of God. Rhododendrons and 
flowering shrubs border the path, and the priest's large walled garden is 
a pleasant resting-place. Brindle, like so many other missions hereabouts, 
is, and has been for over two hundred years, under the charge of 
Benedictines, and in these favoured spots religion flourishes as in the 
golden days of England's faith. 

On a lofty hill, with a perfectly straight drive leading to it for more 
than a mile in length, stands the splendid old castellated mansion, known 
as Hoghton Tower. Once itself a stronghold of the faith, it seems to 
dominate all the country round. At the foot of the hill winds the little 
river Darwen, that once ran red " with blood of Scots imbued." " Not 
many centuries ago," says Mr. Fletcher Moss, in his fascinating 
Pilgrimages to Old Homes, " all this land was wood or forest, noted for its 
wild cattle and deer ; and the wild white bull is still the cognizance of the 
family. We toil upwards to a large, massive castle, whose battlemented 
gatehouse is flanked by towers. .... Crossing the first courtyard, we 
come to a steep flight of rounded steps with an inner court or enclosure 
beyond them, then more steps, and another gatehouse." Within, a 
splendid quadrangle of Tudor buildings, the Great Hall like that of an 
Oxford College, with the " screens " and oriel, where James I. in his 
cups knighted the loin of beef and made it first a sirloin. 

183 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The " Howse which Hoghton of Hoghton, Esquier, enterprysed to 
buylde and ffynysh in 1562," thus still looks down from its proud height 
upon the country-side. Thomas Hoghton the Elizabethan builder was 
a man of faith, nay, a confessor of the faith under the Virgin Queen : a 
friend of William, afterwards Cardinal, Allen, he had the honour or 
entertaining that great man under his roof. It was a dangerous honour, 
for no man was more obnoxious to the new rulers of England than the 
intrepid Cardinal. 

We do not know whether Allen ever lodged under the stately roof of 
Hoghton Tower, for it was being built between 1563 and 1565, just at 
the time that Allen paid his last visit to Lancashire. Mr. Gillow, 
however (and there is no better authority), thinks that he was present 
at the house-warming of the great mansion. But if Allen lodged at the 
old manor-house at Hoghton Bottom, which had sheltered the family 

" E'er since the Hoghtons from this hill took name, 
Who with the stiff, unbridled Saxons came," 

he must have watched with interest the rising of those majestic towers, 
which still look down on busy Lancashire. 

But a greater guest even than he certainly rode up the long steep 
drive to claim a shelter in the stately Tower of Hoghton. This was 
Allen's beloved son, the blessed martyr, Edmund Campion, who came 
here on his missionary tour through Lancashire in the winter of 1580 
1581. But at that time the builder of Hoghton Tower had already 
died in exile, not having long enjoyed the splendours of his house ; 
for, five years after he had completed it, the persecution drove him 
from his native land. Mr. Gillow in his invaluable Dictionary tells us 
that " feeling he could not remain in the country and keep his conscience, 
Hoghton took the advice of his friend, Vivian Haydock (whose son 
William married Hoghton's sister Bryde),* and in 1569, or the beginning 
of the following year, he hired a vessel and sailed from his mansion ot 
The Lea, on the Ribble, to the coast of France, and thence proceeded to 
Antwerp. For this he was declared an outlaw, and possession was taken 
of his estate." He remained in exile till his death, in June 1580, and 
was buried in the Church of St. Gervais, at Liege, where a handsome 
monument was erected to his memory bearing his arms and the following 
inscription : 

" Hie e regione sepultus est vir illustris D. Thomas Houghton Anglus 
qui post decem-annos exilium spontaneum variasque patrimonii et rerum 
omnium direptiones propter Catholicae fidei confessionem a sectariis illatas 

' Thus Mr. Hoghton was connected by marriage with the glorious martyr, Venerable 
George Haydock (1558-84) who in his boyhood must often have visited Hoghton Tower. 
184 




THE GREAT HALL, HOGHTON TOWER 

Photo by James Watts 



To face page 184 



IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS 

obiit 4 Non. Jun. 1580, aetat 63," which, roughly translated, may run 
as follows : 

" Over against this spot lies buried the illustrious man Mr. Thomas 
Houghton, Englishman, who after ten years of voluntary exile, despoiled 
by the sectaries of his patrimony and all his goods for his confession of 
the Catholic faith, died June 2, 1580, aged 63." 

An instrument relative to his estate, drawn up by Dr. Allen at 
Rheims (June 26, 1580), relates that Mr. Hoghton, "our deceased 
friend of godly memory," disposed of all the money he had in hand a 
year before his death, and among other things bequeathed 100 to buy 
a pair of organs, one fair table, and as many books of music as should 
cost 7 (which money be placed in the hands of John Sacheverell, 
Esquire, and Hugo Charnock, Gentleman, his friends and fellow-exiles), 
for the Parish Church of Preston, of which the Hoghtons were patrons, 
" when time should serve." But his executors, seeing little hope of 
being able to fulfil their friend's bequest, agreed with his faithful 
servants, Anthony Stamper and Edmund Stubbes, to give the money to 
Allen for the use of his Seminary, he undertaking to pay it back to 
Preston Church when times should change. 

He had already been a great benefactor to the College, and so, finally, 
on July 5, 1590, his body was carried from Liege to Douay, and 
translated to its last resting-place under the predella of the high altar on 
the Epistle side, when the first High Mass was sung in the new church 
ot the English College there, July 13, 1603. 

He was the author of a most pathetic ballad, entitled : 

"THE BLESSED CONSCIENCE. 

" At Hoghton hygh, which is a bower 

Of sports and lordly pleasure, 
I wept, and lefte that loftie tower 

Wich was my chiefest treasure. 
To save my soul and lose ye reste 

Yt was my trew pretence : 
Lyke fryghted bird, I lefte my neste 

To kepe my conscyence. 

" At Hoghton, where I used to restc 

Of men I hadd great store, 
Ful twentie gentlemen att least, 
Of yeomen gode three score. 
And of them all, I brought but twoe 

Wyth mee, when I cam thence. 
I left them all, ye world knows how, 

To kepe my conscyence. 
2 A 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

" Fayr England ! nowc ten tymes adieu, 

And frendes that theryn dwel ; 
Fayrwel my broder Richard trewe, 

Whom I dyd love soe wel. 
Fayrwel, fayrwel ! gode people all, 

And learn experience ; 
Love not too much ye golden ball, 

But kepe your conscyence." 

The son of this brave confessor, also named Thomas, went with his 
father into exile, and studied at Douay for the priesthood. Bereft of all 
his patrimony, his devotion to the faith cost him also his life. On arriving 
in Lancashire to labour on the mission, he was at once seized and thrown 
into Salford Gaol, where we find him in 1582, and still in 1584, and 
where in all probability he died. He is noted in 1582 as one of those 
Catholic prisoners who " do still continue in their obstinate opinions, 
neither do we see any likelihood of conformity in any of them." 

Mr. Hoghton's brother Richard, who entertained Father Campion at 
Hoghton Tower, was arrested in the summer of 1581, immediately after 
the martyr's own apprehension. It appears that a number of Catholic 
books and papers had been left by Father Campion at Hoghton Tower, 
and these he was on his way to fetch, when he was arrested at Lyford 
Grange. Richard Hoghton survived his imprisonment, but was pursued 
with relentless persecution to the end of his life. 

The Hoghtons only lost the faith through the cruel system, then so 
widely practised, of seizing the head of the family when a minor and 
bringing him up in the new religion. Thus, in the next generation, the 
young Lord of Hoghton was given in ward to Sir Gilbert Gerard, 
Master of the Rolls, who married him to his daughter whilst still under 
age, and brought him up as a Protestant. The same thing happened to 
Thomas Hoghton's great-great-grandson (descended from his only 
daughter Jane), Sir Roger Bradshaigh of Haigh Hall. The rest of the 
Hoghton family retained the faith, and but for these unjust proceedings, 
the Sir Richard Hoghton who entertained our Scottish Solomon on 
August 17, 1617, would have been, like his forefathers, a faithful 
Catholic.* 

When the Lords of Hoghton lost the faith, it might have been 
feared that Brindle and the neighbourhood would not keep it long. But 
the Catholics of Lancashire are of sturdier stuff than that, and though the 
protection of the great house was gone, the farmers and labourers on the 
Hoghton estate have remained firm, for the most part, to this very day. 

* I owe most of these details to Mr. Gillow's HayJock Papers. He prints the ballad 
in full. 

1 86 




THE VENERABLE EDMUND ARROWSMITH, SJ. 

From the original oil-painting at Stonyhurst College 

To face page 186 



IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS 

We must now seek for the traditions of the penal days, not in the 
castle on the hill, but in the farm-houses and villages that cluster in the 
valley below. 

Nowhere, perhaps, in England does the Catholic pilgrim find a more 
consoling spectacle than in this tract of country that lies between Preston 
and Blackburn. Nowhere, perhaps, does he find himself brought more 
into touch with the Merry England of the good old days, before the 
Tudor schism devastated the land. 

Here stands many an old chapel, dating almost from penal days, sur- 
rounded, as of yore, by a sturdy flock, English to the core, and all the 
more true to the faith for the sufferings they have endured for its dear 
sake. Here, too, stands many an old farm-house, in which Holy Mass 
was said by some devoted priest during the dark days when no public 
worship was possible. Here, too, there yet linger priceless traditions of 
the good shepherds who did not fear to lay down their lives for their 
sheep ; and still may be gathered from the lips of aged men, the thrilling 
stories of those days that now seem so far off stories handed down from 
grandsire to grandchild, traditions all the more precious, because they 
are, as it were, family heirlooms, never given to the public, but guarded 
with jealous care by their possessors. But the old houses are gradually 
falling into decay, the old generation quickly passing away. It is well 
"to gather up the fragments that nothing be lost." 

Thus it was that a pilgrim spent some days in this neighbourhood, 
trying to gather up the memories of one of the glorious martyrs who 
once ministered there, and here is the result of his labour of love. 

We have no intention of writing a life of Venerable Edmund Arrow- 
smith, S.J. It has been fully done already by Brother Foley in his 
Records, and again, most charmingly, in a little Catholic Truth 
Society pamphlet, by the veteran historian, Father Francis Goldie, S.J. 
But we may briefly sketch the martyr's career in order to introduce him 
to our readers. He was a Lancashire man, born between Wigan and 
Warrington, at Haydock, in Winwick parish, to Robert Arrowsmith, 
yeoman, and Margery Gerard his wife. The Gerards were, and still are, 
a family ennobled both by ancient lineage and faithful adherence to the 
old religion. 

Our martyr was born in 1585, and was christened Bryan, or Barnaby. 
He took the name of Edmund in Confirmation, no doubt because it was 
the name of his uncle, who was a distinguished professor at Douay Col- 
lege. Bryan was a very pious child : we learn that he used to recite 
the Little Hours of Our Lady's Office on his way to school with his 
brothers, and her Vespers and Compline on the way home. This school 
seems to have been the Grammar School at Senely Green (built in 1587), 

187 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

which now serves as a Catholic Infant School attached to the Mission of 
Birchley. It was not till he was twenty that Bryan got across to Douay, 
and there received the Sacrament of Confirmation and the name by which 
he was henceforth known. He was a delicate lad, and twice during his 
studies had a serious breakdown, but he recovered his health and per- 
severed in his vocation to the priesthood, to which he was at last raised 
at Arras, December 9, 1612. And thus at the age of twenty-seven he 
came back to England to labour in God's vineyard. We are told that 
he was small and rather uncouth in appearance, but of a bright and 
pleasant disposition and very attractive in conversation. He was also full 
of fun. After ten years' arduous labour in Lancashire, he was arrested 
and lodged in Lancaster Castle. He was, however, released, and made 
use of his liberty to join the Society of Jesus, which he had for years 
longed to do. This was in 1624. Each year he retired to some out-of- 
the-way spot in Lancashire to make a retreat of ten or twelve days with 
other of his fellow religious. 

And so we come to the summer of 1628, when the quarrel between 
King Charles I. and the Parliament was running high ; this year found 
Father Arrowsmith labouring in the neighbourhood of Brindle. 
Frequently he said Mass on the old Missionary Altar, described in 
another place, belonging to the Burgess family, and now preserved 
at Bolton-le-Sands. They were settled at that time at Denham Hall, 
Brindle. 

Another house in which he used to say Mass, and in which it is said 
he celebrated what was probably his last Mass, is still standing in Gregson 
Lane in Brindle. One end of it now faces the entrance to Gregson Lane 
Mill. "It is believed to have been erected about 1580, and is a fine 
example of the comfortable yeoman's dwelling of that period, an interest- 
ing feature of the building being a small room in which the ironwork 
around the fire-place is hammered into a representation of the wheat and 
vine, emblematic of the bread and wine used in the Mass. It is said 
that at the beginning of the eighteenth century this house was the resi- 
dence of the Gregsons of Gregson Lane, one of whom placed his initials, 
' G.G.,' with a cross and the date, 1 700, on the lintel of the porch, thus 
giving later generations the erroneous impression that the building was 
erected in 1700. Near this house was dug up in 1899 a very ancient 
font, possibly of the ninth century, and in the garden of a cottage close 
by stands a beautiful old wayside cross. Local tradition asserts that at this 
same old house the Venerable Edmund Arrowsmith, the Jesuit martyr, 
said his last Mass. There are other interesting traditions of his presence 
in the neighbourhood. The writer possesses a tiny statue, enclosed in 
an ivory niche, which Father Arrowsmith is said to have dropped as he 
188 




THE HOUSE OF THE LAST MASS, GREGSON LANE 
Photo by IV. T. Bateson 




THE ROOM WHERE THE LAST MASS WAS SAID 

Photo by W. T. Bateson To face page 188 



IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS 

escaped from the Old Blue Anchor Inn at the Straits in Hoghton Lane."* 
An illustration of this relic is here given. So far a local antiquary but 
we must now return to the house in Gregson Lane. There still exists a 
dark attic under the thatch, corresponding to the secret oratory of Father 
Postgate at Egton. There is no light in this attic, and it is only reached 
by a ladder and a trap-door. It is situated in the gable end of the house, 
to the right as you enter the porch, and was probably a priest's hiding- 
place. A mullioned window 
in this end of the house 
lights the room that leads 
to this attic. Alas ! the 
thatched roof has recently 
been replaced by hideous 
corrugated iron, a truly 
lamentable vulgarisation of 
this fine old dwelling. Our 
martyr's last Mass is said 
to have been celebrated in 
a bedroom at the east end 
of the house, of which we 
give an illustration. A 
cross is faintly seen in the 
gable-end of this room near 
the top. 

One very remarkable 
fact must be mentioned 
about this house. It is 
vouched for by several 
members of the Walmesley 
family who have lived there, 
including the present occu- 
pants. It is said that a cross of light appears at intervals on the wall of 
the room in which the last Mass was said, and remains visible for some 
little time. My informants, including a Catholic doctor of the neigh- 
bourhood, tell me that there is no possible natural explanation of this 
phenomenon. The present occupier, Mr. Walmesley, has seen it several 
times. It appears high up on the wall. The previous occupant, whose 
name is Worden, has also frequently seen it. 

In the year 1841, while some earlier occupants, also named 
Walmesley, lived in the house, a great storm of wind blew down part 

* Kindly communicated by Mr. George Hull, from his Historical Sketch of St. JosepA's, 
Brindle. 

189 




IVORY .IHOIAJE. ~ JAlO TO HAVE. OtLONGtO 
TO THE. Vt/VtRABLt. EOMVO ARBOWJMITH. 

1 y, h * o i 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of a wall in the attic, and behind it was discovered a hiding-place in 
which was found a box containing a chalice and two vestments, and 
two altar-stones, one broken. The chalice appears to have been 
given to a Mr. Thomas Parkinson, who was then studying for 
the priesthood, but I have been unable to trace it further. One 
of the chasubles and the altar-stones were given by Mrs. 
Walmesley to Father Ildephonsus Brown, O.S.B., of Ampleforth 
Abbey, who was pastor of the Brindle Mission from 1874 to 1884. 
He, considering that these treasures were relics of a Jesuit martyr, 
very generously gave the chasuble to the museum of Stonyhurst 
College. This beautiful vestment is powdered with Gothic flowers of 
the conventional type, and further adorned with a charming little figure 
of St. John the Baptist. It is made of inferior silk, and is much worn, 
especially in front, where the mending is of the rudest character. The 
groundwork is now brown. It was once red, with a blue cross on the 
back. The pillar in front has floral designs like the back. The neck- 
piece is Y-shaped, and can be drawn together by a hook and eye. The 
front is very much narrower than the back. The lining is of coarse 
linen. The stole and maniple are lost. We should take the date to be 
late fifteenth century. 

A former occupant of the house writes to me : " I think that 
there is still something hidden in the house, as in one room, 
where there is a very thick wall, there is plainly marked in black 
a cross with three lines below, and no matter how often the wall is 
whitewashed, the cross always reappears." This is in the pantry, which 
is approached through the kitchen, at the west end of the house. This 
pantry is only about yi ft. by 6 ft., and could not hold more than six 
people. The cross is on the north side, about 2 ft. from the west wall. 
Undoubtedly Holy Mass was sometimes said in this small room. An 
altar-stone, broken in half and enclosed in a coarse canvas bag, so as to 
be folded and put into the pocket, was found here. But it is not known 
what has become of it, though it may possibly be found at Ampleforth 
Abbey. 

The Walmesley family still cherish as a very precious relic a 
part of the other less perfect vestment which Father Arrowsmith is said 
to have worn in their house. - My informant writes : " It must have 
been purple, but it is very much faded. It was put on the bed when I 
was confined of my first child, with a promise, if all went well (of which 
there were grave doubts), the child should be either a priest or a nun. 
The girl who was then born has always had a desire from her birth to 
be a nun." 

The dark blue lining of this chasuble was given to Father Ildephonsus 
190 



IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS 

Brown, who still possesses it. The silk vestment was divided among 
friends of the Walmesleys, they naturally keeping the largest portion. 
The altar-stone and half the broken one are in possession of Father Brown, 
who is now stationed at Parbold near Southport. It is of course not 
certain that these relics really were used by our martyr, but it is at least 
extremely probable. 

Across the railway at the modern Hoghton Station runs Hoghton 
Lane, leading directly to Preston through Walton-le-Dale. A few hundred 




yards in the direction of Gregson Lane and Walton is a part of the road 
called the Straits. Here, on the left-hand side of the road, formerly 
stood a picturesque old half-timbered house with a thatched roof. This 
was the old Blue Anchor Inn, and I am able to give a drawing of it, from 
an old photograph, for unhappily it has been pulled down in recent years. 
This old house was used by Father Arrowsmith as a place of refuge, and 
contained a hiding-place, the position of which is marked in the sketch. 
It was entered from a bedroom at the south end of the building. One 
of my kind informants, Mr. William Bolton, tells me that he has frequently 
visited this hiding-place. It was from this house that the martyr fled on 
his last fatal journey, dropping as he did so, for he was heavily laden, the 
little ivory statuette already mentioned. 

We have now to consider the history of the martyr's arrest, as given 

191 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

by his own lips at his trial, supplemented by the topographical details 
which the devout Catholics of the neighbourhood have carefully handed 
down. My principal informant as to these traditions is Mr. Peter 
Worden, now of Bolton-le-Sands, near Carnforth, whose forefathers have 
lived in the same locality from time immemorial. He lived as a boy with 
his parents for ten years (1843-1853) in the nearest house to the spot 
where Father Arrowsmith was arrested.* 

He says : " I believe there was little change in the place up to that 
time. The Moss Ditch (which, as we shall hear, played so fatal a part in 
the tragedy) was then open. It was drained about thirty years ago. 1 
left that district in 1864, and have only visited it once or twice a year 
since." 

" There is little doubt that the last few years of Father Arrowsmith 
were spent in the neighbourhood of Brindle. He rode about on horse- 
back a good deal, and a man often rode with him, and brought the horse 
back which Father Arrowsmith had ridden, after he had dismounted near 
the place where he was about to celebrate Holy Mass. No doubt he 
had a large area. I have heard that he said Mass at Lower Hall, Church 
Bottoms ; Fleetwood Hall, in Samlesbury ; Jack Green, Brindle ; 
Wickenhouse Farm, Withnell ; Wheelton ; Denham Hall, near Clayton 
Green ; Woodcock Hall, Cuerden ; and Livesey Hall, near Blackburn." 

The occasion of our martyr's apprehension was his zeal for the 
sanctity of marriage. Two first-cousins, of whom the man was a 
Catholic, named Holden, had been married by the Protestant minister. 
They seemed to have lived with the man's father in the old Blue Anchor 
Inn already described. Father Arrowsmith was engaged in procuring a 
dispensation to make the marriage valid when the young woman also 
became a Catholic. When the dispensation came from Rome, the 
Father would not make use of it unless the parties had separated for 
the space of fourteen days. This incensed them so much that they 
determined to betray him. They knew that he used to stay in their 
father's house, and, knowing the time when he was to return there, they 
had the wickedness to send word to Captain Rawsthorn, a Justice of the 
Peace (the Rawsthorn family still reside at Penwortham, near Preston), 
to come and apprehend the priest. The Justice was unwilling to injure 
old Mr. Holden, who was a neighbour of his, and sent to warn him, 
bidding him send the Father away before he came to search the house. 
Our martyr hastily left the house, and set out on horseback, as we shall 
hear, with his books and belongings, intending to seek shelter, as it is 
supposed, in an out-of-the-way farmhouse at Withnell. The pursuers 

* I have also to thank Mr. George Hull and Mr. William Bolton for much valuable 
information about places and traditions which they have known from childhood. 
192 



IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS 

were sent off on the Blackburn Road, but Father Arrowsmith had taken 
the opposite direction. However, in doubling back on his track, he came 
across some of his pursuers, and was apprehended by the servant of the 
Justice, and his son, a boy of only twelve years old, who were returning 



.**< 




,.y 



from the search. They witnessed against him at his trial that he had 
tried to withdraw them from the Protestant religion. 

We will now give the martyr's own account of his arrest, from the 
records of his trial. 

" The servant of God upon this humbly begged leave to speak, which 
being granted, he spoke to this effect : ' My lord, as I was upon the road, 
that very man, as I take it, rushed out upon me with a drawn sword. He 
was meanly dressed, and upon horseback. I made what haste I could 
from him, but being weak and sickly, was forced by him at last to the 
Moss, where I alighted, and fled with all the speed I was able which 
yet could not be very great, seeing I was loaded with heavy clothes, books, 
and other things. At length he came up to me at the Moss Ditch, and struck 
at me, though I had nothing to defend myself with but a little walking- 

2B 193 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

stick, and a sword, which I did not draw ; with the blow he cut the stick 
close to my hand, and did me some little hurt. I then asked him if his 
design was to take my purse and my life. He answered that perhaps it 
was : and then I fled again from him, but was soon overtaken. Then 
came up this youth (the Justice's son), who has given evidence against 
me, with others to assist him. They used me with much indignity, and 
took me to an alehouse, and searched me to the skin, offering insults 
which modesty forbids me to relate, and which I resisted as far as I was 
able. That done, they fell to drinking, and spent nine shillings of my 
money in an hour ; they told me that the Justice of the Peace, by whose 
warrant I was apprehended, was there in person, but that I would not 
believe. Upon this occasion, my Lords, I began to find fault with the 
man's wicked and rude behaviour who seemed to be the ringleader ; 
and I besought him for Jesu's sake to give up his disordered life, 
drinking, dissolute talk, and whatever might offend Almighty God. 
Upon my word and my life, this, or to this effect, is all 1 said to him. 
Let him look on me and gainsay it, if he can. As for that youth, I 
deny not to have told him, that I hoped when he came to riper years, 
he would look better into himself, and become a true Catholic, for that, 
and that alone, would be the means to save his soul ; to which he made 
no answer at all. And I hope, my Lords, that neither they, nor any 
other can prove ill against me." 

So far the martyr. If now the reader will examine the map which 
we append, he will be able to trace the very route taken by the holy 
man in his flight, and if good fortune ever take him to Brindle, he will 
be thus in a position to make a pilgrimage in the martyr's steps. 

"It is thought," writes Mr. Worden, "that he intended to go to 
Wickenhouse Farm, Withnell, an isolated place where he sometimes said 
Mass. A man accompanied him on horseback. They set off in a contrary 
direction to Withnell, going on the road towards Preston, but turned to the 
left past the Oak Tree Inn, and went up Gregson Lane. They passed over 
Jack Green, by the Town House (a gentleman's house now known as ' The 
Nook'), and then turned to the left towards Marsh Lane Head. They 
turned again to the left at the Well, where there is a farm-house, then 
occupied by a family named Crook, past Windmill Hill, on to Brindle Moss. 
Meanwhile the pursuer had got on the scent, and inquired at the farm 
at the Well which way the two horsemen had gone. Crook, the farmer, 
directed him, as he had observed the fugitives pass his house. The 
pursuer overtook them at the Moss (which abuts on Duxon Hill), and 
ran on our martyr with his drawn sword. Finding that his horse refused 
to jump the Moss Ditch, the Father dismounted and ran along by its 
side, hoping to reach the place higher up where the ditch is much 
194 



IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS 

narrower. The ditch still exists, but is now roughly bridged over with 
thick stones or flags. He ran on for some little time till he came to 
this narrower part, but here, as he tells us, the pursuer overtook him. 
Meanwhile, the man who should have been his protector deserted him. 
The martyr was apprehended, with the help of the rest of the party 
who soon came up, and was carried by them first to the toll-house at 
Marsh Lane End, and thence to the Boar's Head Inn inHoghton 
Lane, not far from the present railway station. Here he wasi subjected 
to the infamies of which he complained at his trial. He^was then 
carried off to the dungeons of Lancaster Castle. 

" If his horse had jumped the Moss Ditch he would soon have been 
on the Blackburn Road. By turning to the right at Riley Green, he 
would have got to Billy Street on the Chorley Road. Then to the 
right, they would soon have reached the occupation road leading to 
Wickenhouse Farm. Father Arrowsmith could then have dismounted 
and walked by this secluded road to the farm unobserved. The man 
would have gone on with both horses to Wheelton, then by Copthurst, 
Waterhouse Green, andi through Brindle, home. That is supposed to 
have been the plan." 

The late Mr. William Brindle, of Brimmicroft, Hoghton (whose 
mother was a Livesey), when an old man, told Mr. Worden that 
Wickenhouse Farm had been inhabited by the Liveseys since the 
Reformation. The room was still shown in which Father Arrowsmith 
and other priests had said Mass. Unhappily the old farm is now in 
ruins. It began to fall into decay about the year 1899, and was then 
demolished in order to provide stones to repair another old farm- 
house, near at hand, to which the Livesey family removed. This is now 
called New Wickenhouse Farm, though its old name was Taylor's 
Farm. 

Mr. Worden continues : " My uncle, William Walmsley, told me 
that Crook, the farmer, went after the pursuer of Father Arrowsmith, 
and was given his cloak as a reward for the information he had given. 
He had a fine boy about eleven years of age, and he got a tailor to 
come to the house to make the child a suit out of the martyr's cloak. 
When he put it on, the family was much pleased with his appearance, 
and to celebrate the event he was put on the back of a horse, to take 
a triumphal ride. But though the child had previously ridden this 
horse, which was a quiet one, it at once, on feeling his weight, set off at 
a gallop and threw him. His head struck a stone on the roadside, and 
the poor boy was killed on the spot. The stone was visible for a long 
distance when I was a boy, but the road has been raised at that part and 
the stone covered. The family were so frightened that they returned 

195 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

to the Catholic faith. They were up to that time noted for their good 
looks, but the children of their descendants were for long afterwards in 
some way deformed or dwarfs. My uncle said that God had punished 
them severely, though they afterwards kept the faith and were very 
striving. One of the last I remember was James, alias ' Turk,' a dwarf. 
They lived at a place called Bullocks, on the river Darwen side, above 
Samlesbury Mill. He was drowned in the river Darwen in February, 
1862.* 

" I have often heard it said that Father Arrowsmith was once dis- 
puting about religion with the Vicar of Brindle, near the church wall, 
and he said : ' If my religion is right, my foot will leave its impression 
on this stone,' and he sent his foot back against the wall, and left the 
impress of his boot." So far Mr. Worden. 

This last story is very interesting, as parallel legends may be found 
about many of the saints, notably about SS. Peter and Paul at Santa 
Francesca Romana, in Rome, and St. Benedict at Monte Cassino. The 
impress of Our Lord's Feet are shown at the " Domine quo Vadis," on 
the Appian Way, and on the Mount of Olives, in the Church of the 
Ascension. We are informed that the stone has been built over or 
reversed so that the impression can no longer be seen. This was done 
because of the reverence shown to it by Catholics. 

The rare printed Life of the Martyr,f written probably by Father 
Cornelius Morphy, S.J., and published in London in 1737, adds : 
" There is a letter extant of this blessed man, the first he wrote after 
he was imprisoned, which hath these words : 'All particulars did so 
co-operate to my apprehension and bringing hither, that 1 can easily 
discover more than an ordinary providence of Almighty God therein.' ' 
The author then mentions, among others, these : " When the blessed 
man was flying from his persecutors at the time of his apprehension, he 
was extraordinarily well mounted ; and yet whatsoever desire he had 
and diligence he used, it was not possible to put his horse to any 
speed. ... A kinsman of his own, whom he had in nature of a servant, 
well known to be a stout man, forsook him and fled away, when the 
least resistance might have preserved him." 

Another tradition of the martyr in Brindle is, that an old " malt- 

* I have received a very touching letter from Mr. William Crook, one of this family. 
He ends as follows : " Dear Father, our family may have suffered for their folly in the 
past, but let us hope there is a brighter day before us. I would ask you to remember us 
at the altar, as we will remember you in our prayers." The writer is a nephew of the 
poor man who was drowned in the Darwen. No doubt the martyr's prayers have won for 
the family the grace of the true faith. 

t A True and Exact Relation of the Death of Two Catholics Who Suffered for Their Religion 
at the Summer Assizes, held at Lancaster, 1682. A copy is in the Library of Oscott College. 
196 




tt! 
W 
E 

h 

< 
fa 



O 
Q 



W 



I 1 

8, 




O - 



IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS 

house " in the neighbourhood was used as a hiding-place by Father 
Arrowsmith and two or three other priests. This old malt-house 
is in good preservation. It is situated in a field off Brier's Brow, 
Wheelton (near Chorley), close to the present Catholic Church of 
South Hill. It is some considerable distance from the high road 
going from Preston to Chorley, and on the left side. The malt-house 
now forms several cottages, but it was formerly used as a farm- 
house. A new farm-house has been built just behind. An old holy- 
water stoup is still to be seen in the house, and the hiding-place of the 
martyr still exists. Another place where Father Arrowsmith is said to 
have celebrated Holy Mass in this neighbourhood is a house at Lockett 
Lane, close to Wheelton, the residence of a branch of the Andertons of 
Euxton. 

Yet another forgotten shrine is Slate Delph Farm, Wheelton. Only 
last year the original steps to the humble loft where the martyr said Mass- 
were removed, as I am informed by Dr. Thomas P. Leighton of Brinscall. 
The plain glass chalice used by the martyr at Slate Delph Farm is still 
preserved in Catholic hands. This is an exceedingly interesting relic, 
for glass chalices must be very rare. At Slate Delph Farm (as at other 
places) " washed linen " was put out on a certain hedge to inform the 
people that Mass was to be said there that day. 

We need not follow the holy martyr to his glorious death at 
Lancaster. The incidents of his trial and cruel martyrdom have been 
admirably recounted by Father Goldie. \Ve may, however, give the 
fine old print of the martyrdom from Tanner's Sociefas Jesu usque ad 
sanguinis et vit<e profusionem militant (Pragae, 1675). It took place on 
August 28, 1628. The martyr was forty-three years old. The gallows 
was erected about a quarter of a mile from the Castle. Near it were a 
cauldron, boiling high over a vast fire, the butcher's knife and other 
apparatus of torture. " Nothing grieves me so much as this F,ngland 
which I pray God soon to convert," he cried from the ladder ; and with 
an earnestness which moved his auditors to tears, he bade them bear 
witness that he died a steadfast Roman Catholic, and exhorted them to 
become members of the one true Church. His last words were Bone 
Jesu " Good Jesus ! " as he was thrown from the ladder and the 
butchery began. From that cruel agony his soul fled to heaven. His 
name is still greatly honoured at Lancaster, and when the present writer 
made his pilgrimage to the Castle, the custodians took care to point 
out to him, without even being asked, the place where the trial took 
place, and the exact spot on John of Gaunt's Tower where the sacred 
quarters were exposed on high, according to the orders of the brutal 
judge. 

197 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Finally, let us mention one or two other relics and memorials of 
the martyr which have been handed down to us. 

At Ampleforth Abbey is now preserved an old sideboard, which is 
said to have been frequently used by Father Arrowsmith as an altar. It 
was in the possession of the Dennet family at Appleton, in Lancashire, 
who lived within three hundred yards of a house occupied for some 
years by the venerable martyr. A member of this family was the Mother 
Prioress of the nuns of St. Sepulchre, now at New Hall in Essex, and 
the present Abbot Smith, of Ampleforth, remembers an old relative 
who died about 1859, at the age of 91 or 92, who knew this prioress, 
and handed down the tradition from her. The marks left by the two 
Mass candles on the mensa of this improvised altar are still clearly 
visible. The vestments were kept in a cupboard at the side. The altar 
passed into the possession of Miss Ellen Nightingale, a niece of the 
Dennets, who afterwards married John Smith, of Sutton, County Lan- 
caster, and was the mother of the Right Rev. Abbot Smith, and of 
Mrs. Dawson, of Preston. The latter presented the altar to Ampleforth 
Abbey in 1905, and it is now in St. Peter's Chapel there. I owe these 
particulars to the kindness of the Abbot. 

At Stanbrook Abbey is preserved a little cross, which has been 
handed down in the Talbot family of Padgate near Warrington, as 
having belonged to the martyr. These Talbots claimed to be relatives 
of Father Arrowsmith, and they cherished this tiny cross as a very 
precious relic. One of them, Margaret Talbot, became a lay-sister at 
Stanbrook, under the name of Sister Elizabeth. She received the cross 
from her mother, who gave it to her because she thought it would be safer 
than with her son. 1 have been unable to learn more particulars of 
the history of this little cross. On the obverse side Our Lord is 
represented, and on the reverse Our Lady. The inscription on the 
latter runs: " Vir. Imm. vitam prasst. pusam " (sic.') i.e. "Virgo 
Immaculata vitam praesta puram " (Virgin Immaculate, grant to us a 
pure life.) 

We need not be surprised that relics of our martyr came into the 
hands of his friends. Brother Foley prints a very interesting letter from 
a certain Henry Holme, who seems to have been a warder in Lancaster 
Castle, to a priest named Thomas Metcalfe, attesting the authenticity of 
certain relics he had given him.* In it he says : " The certainty of 
those things which I did deliver you at your being at Lancaster, 1 will 
affirm to be true, for the hair and the pieces of the ribs I did take 
myself at the going up of the plumbers to see the leads, when they were 
to mend them ; and the handkerchief was dipped in his blood at the time 

* Foley Records, vol. ii. p. 59, from the Westminster Archives. 
198 



IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS 

of his quarters coming back from the execution to the Castle, by me 
likewise with my own hands. You know the handkerchief was your 
own which you gave me at your departure, and for the piece of the 
quarter, both I and some others had taken part of it for our friends, 
which Mr. Southworth can witness ; and that which I gave you, John 
Rigmaden, our keeper, gave me leave to take. . . ." This letter is 
actually endorsed by John Rigmaden, the keeper of Lancaster Castle, so 
it is evident that then as now, the martyr had sympathetic friends in his 
very prison. 

Indeed the people of Lancaster always sympathised with him. At 
his martyrdom their behaviour, says his ancient biographer, was very 
remarkable. " In proof of their detestation of this judicial murder, no 
man could be prevailed upon to undertake the execution, except a 
butcher, who though ashamed to become the hangman himself, engaged 
for five pounds that his servant should despatch the martyr. This the 
servant, out of a feeling of humanity and respect for that good man, 
refused, and when informed of his master's shameful contract, he fled 
from his service, and was never seen by him again. Within the gaol 
itself the same spirit was displayed. Felons and malefactors, though 
offered their own lives, would lend no hand to injustice ; till a deserter, 
under sentence of death for leaving his regiment, offered for the sum of 
forty shillings, the prisoner's clothes, and his own liberty, to be the vile 
instrument of the murder. But this made him so detested by the good 
people of Lancaster, that none would lend him an axe wherewith to slay 
the servant of God." 

We learn from a contemporary report that the martyr's clothes and 
the knife that cut him up came into the possession of a devout Catholic, 
Sir Cuthbert Clifton. Thus we are not surprised that the martyr's near 
relatives, the Gerard family, were able to secure for themselves no less a 
relic than his right hand. No record, apparently, remains as to how 
they secured it, but it was in their possession at Garswood, Ashton-in- 
Makerfield, for many generations. It is at present preserved with great 
reverence in the church of St. Oswald, at Ashton, wrapped in linen and 
enclosed in a silver casket. 

In the "Life " of the martyr, published in 1737, is a very circum- 
stantial account of a miracle of healing, worked through the means of 
this holy hand, on Thomas Hawarden, a child of twelve, at Appleton- 
within-Widnes, in Lancashire. It is certified by no fewer than nineteen 
witnesses, several of whom have signed as Protestants. Since that time 
the miracles worked through this holy relic are innumerable, and con- 
tinue down to our own day, nor was this the first cure recorded. Some 
twenty to sixty pilgrims still visit the " Holy Hand " every week, and 

199 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

after Mass every day it is applied to those who are suffering. More 
than this, linen which has touched this relic is frequently sent to the 
sick who are not able to make the pilgrimage, and in many cases cures 
.are recorded. The present writer remembers meeting at Bournemouth 
in 1893 Father O'Reilly, the then priest of Ashton, who told him that a 
few days before he had taken to a poor woman, who was expecting an 
operation for cancer or tumour in the infirmary at Bournemouth, a piece 
of linen, which she had applied to her breast. That very morning the 
surgeon had come to perform the operation, and had found to his 
astonishment that the tumour had entirely disappeared, and that no 
operation was needed. Many other most wonderful cures are recorded 
at length by Brother Foley and Father Goldie. 

We may quote one which they do not give, but which appeared in 
the Messenger of the Sacred Heart, for December 1 900. " At Seaforth, a 
little boy was in danger of losing his sight through the recurrence 
during two years of malignant ulcers. Specialists were consulted, but 
no good effected. One eye was almost lost, and the other was going 
rapidly. Many Masses were offered and novenas made. At last the 
little fellow was taken, in a state of intense suffering, to be touched by 
Venerable Father Arrowsmith's hand. He returned home happy and 
free from pain ; the eyes gradually healed, and are now bright and clear, 
only a slight mark remaining to remind one of the time of trial, and of 
worse suffering averted. With grateful hearts his family now fulfil their 
promise of publication." 

Another recent miracle has the merit not only of making a very 
pretty story, but of being recounted by a medical man. Dr. Leighton 
of Brinscall writes (March 31, 1910) as follows : "One of my collectors, 
John James Denhurst, who, when four years old, could not walk or 
talk, was taken by his mother and touched by the Holy Hand. He 
immediately exclaimed, " Mother Mary." 

A lady, Miss Almond, of Badminton Road, Balham, tells me that 
when living at Liverpool she herself witnessed two miracles through 
the application of linen that had touched Father Arrowsmith's hand. 
The second one, which happened about 1870, was the cure of a little 
girl who through severe illness had entirely lost the use of her legs. 
She was instantaneously cured, to her doctor's amazement, by the touch 
of the linen. 

Another correspondent from St. Katherine's Convent, Queen Square, 
tells of a friend of hers who was instantly cured of complete lameness by 
the same means. A novena was made to the holy martyr, and afterwards 
the linen was applied to her knee. The pain caused was so great that 
she screamed aloud, but the next instant she was perfectly and completely 
.200 



IN A MARTYR'S FOOTSTEPS 

cured. She had been so helpless till then that she had to be carried up 
and down stairs. 

As our glorious martyr was being hanged, an eye-witness of credit 
declared that he saw, at the moment the holy man expired, a very 
brilliant light extending in a stream from the Castle to the gallows, like 
resplendent glass. Never in his life before had he seen anything of the 
kind. "But the path of the just, as a shining light, goeth forward and 
increaseth even to perfect day." (Prov. iv. 18). 



201 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

THE "SKULL HOUSE" 

SOME of the pleasantest recollections of the writer are woven 
round a visit paid in company with the present Bishop of 
Salford to the historic Hall of Wardley. It is true that 
the day was a deplorable one, Manchester and its environs 
being wrapped in a heavy pall of dense fog, which made it impossible 
even to see across the moat of Wardley Hall, yet the interest of the 
visit was so great, the hospitable welcome we received so kind and 
cordial, the sense of having at last been able to fulfil a long-cherished 
wish so delightful, that this day of pilgrimage is marked henceforth 
with a white stone in the tablets of memory. For it was no mere 
historic mansion that the good Bishop took us to visit ; the interest of 
Wardley is more than antiquarian : it is not only a beautiful old house, 
it is a martyr's shrine. 

Beautiful it undoubtedly is, and fascinating to the antiquary beyond 
many old houses, but its unique glory is signified in its name of the 
" Skull House," for it guards in its very innermost heart the head of 
one of Christ's chiefest martyrs in England. For as all Lancashire now 
knows, the skull that is enshrined on the staircase wall of Wardley is 
that of the Venerable Servant of God, Edward Ambrose Barlow, monk 
of the Holy Order of St. Benedict, who shed his blood for his faith at 
Lancaster, September 10, 1641. 

This has indeed not always been so clear as it happily now is, for as 
we shall see, various popular legends grew up around the relic, and gave 
rise to much confusion. But the skill and learning of Mr. Joseph 
Gillow have unravelled the tangle for us, and we may now be morally 
certain that the Skull House of Wardley enshrines the head of the 
martyr-monk of Manchester. 

Before we proceed to recount the life of this holy and venerable priest, 
it may be well to give some account of the old house which is so closely 
associated with his memory. Wardley Hall has found a most competent 
historian in the person of its present tenant, Colonel Henry Vaughan 
Hart-Davis (late R.E.), Chief Agent to the Earl of Ellesmere, to whom 
the house belongs. The splendid volume which appeared in 1908 
bears witness not merely to his antiquarian research but to his artistic 
skill, for the illustrations which give so much charm to the book are all 
reproduced from the talented author's own drawings. In his careful 
and tender hands the venerable mansion has been repaired and restored 
to much of its pristine beauty and magnificence, after a long period of 
202 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

neglect and degradation. He is intensely proud of it, as well he may 
be, and no little of our pleasure in visiting the old place was derived 
from his own enthusiasm for its manifold beauties. It is always a joy 
to see an ancient house in good hands, and Wardley is indeed happy, 
for it could not have fallen into better keeping. 

It is from Colonel Hart-Davis that we have gleaned what we know 
of the history of Wardley.* 

The Hall is situated in the township of Worsley, about six miles 
from Manchester, on the famous Bridgewater estate. It is certainly by 
no means an ideal situation for such a quaint and venerable building. 
Hemmed in by coal-pits, whose seams stretch around and even beneath 
its walls, this ancient seat of early manorial lords, with its wide moat 
and protecting woods, now forms an oasis in the midst of a grimy and 
unattractive neighbourhood. Perhaps indeed we value its beauty the 
more on account of the contrast it presents to its surroundings. It is 
said to have been built by one Thurstan Tyldesley, in the reign of 
Edward VI., though there is distinct evidence of the existence of an 
earlier house since about the year 1300. 

A manorial residence in those days needed means of defence, and 
Wardley Hall was amply supplied with them. The services of two small 
streams have been controlled to form the unusually large moat, and the 
direction of these streams has influenced the plan of the building, which 
consists of an irregular quadrangle, the eastern and western sides of 
which converge towards the south. The inner court is about fifty feet by 
thirty-five feet in extent. The main entrance is under a handsome gate- 
house on the north side, but the drawbridge has disappeared, for the 
moat on this side has been filled up in quite modern times. On 
the east of this gateway was the ancient Chapel, now, alas ! completely 
modernised and degraded into a store-house. The quadrangle is ex- 
tremely beautiful. Half-timbered, with quaint gables, projecting eaves, 
carved oak beams, and mullioned windows, the old fabric has a picturesque 
charm which is only enhanced by its irregularity of plan. Unhappily 
the old half-timbering of the northern or gate-house side has disappeared, 
but the contrast that this brick wing makes with the rest is not un- 
pleasing. The chimneys of moulded brick are very picturesque. The 
front door is not placed directly opposite the entrance gate, as it should 
be, but almost in the south-east corner. This is no doubt due to the 
irregularity of the plan. It opens, as in all old houses of this type, on 
the " Screens," i.e. a passage which goes through the house, and has on 
the right the Great Hall, and on the left the buttery and kitchen, an 

* We have to thank him, and his publishers, Messrs. Sherratt and Hughes of Man- 
chester, for leave to reproduce two of the illustrations from his book. 

203 



FORGQTTEN SHRINES 

arrangement familiar enough to all who know the colleges at Oxford or 
Cambridge. The domestic offices on the left have, in this case, dis- 
appeared, since the eastern wing has been completely remodelled, and 
the ancient banqueting hall no longer serves its original purpose. 

The Great Hall has been mutilated by a party-wall which cuts off a 
portion used as a boudoir. What is more grievous is that the height has 
also been reduced by the later addition of a floor across it at about half its 
height. Colonel Hart-Davis thinks that this was done as early as 1551. 
Thus the beautiful open-timbered roof, exposed once more at the 
restoration, can only be seen by going upstairs, where the upper story of 
the hall makes a very fine apartment. The original proportions of the 
hall were forty feet in length by twenty-one feet in width. 

The fireplace in the Great Hall is of stone, standing in a deep over- 
arched recess. This has a particular interest, for, as Colonel Hart-Davis 
reminded us, it was here that Francis Downes, the Catholic lord of 
Wardley, converted to the old faith the Puritan, Sir Cecil Trafford of 
Traffbrd, and thus secured to the Church a family which has ever since 
been conspicuous for its fidelity and devotion. But of this more anon. 
On the northern side of the Hall, west of the great window that looks on 
the courtyard, and just opposite the fireplace, is the glazed niche in the 
wall which contains the martyr's skull. It is high up, for it is on a level 
with the first landing of the great staircase, which is just behind this wall. 
The niche is in fact a square hole cut right through the wall and opening 
on the one side to the hall and on the other side to the staircase. Oaken 
doors close over the glazed openings, so that the relic can be entirely 
screened from prying eyes. It is best examined from the staircase, as 
there it is on a level with the eye. 

It certainly gives a thrill to the stranger whose gaze lights for the 
first time on this relic of mortality thus enshrined in the principal apart- 
ment of this noble mansion. Some, no doubt, are shocked and disturbed 
by being brought into such close contact with a human skull, and may 
wonder at the strange taste which has thus exposed a death's-head in a 
living-room. But to those who know its history, the skull of Wardley 
is encircled with a sacred aureole, and even those who do not share the 
faith for which the martyr died, honour with deep and simple reverence the 
memorial of one who was loyal to his conscience even unto death. 

Thus, far from being troubled at its presence, the family which now 
occupies the old Hall looks upon the martyr's skull, we are assured, as a 
protection and an honour to their home, and this reverence is fully shared 
by the noble owners of Wardley. 

The staircase by which it rests is a very magnificent one, dating no 
doubt from the time when the Great Hall was divided into two stories, 
204 




WARDLEY HALL FROM THE SOUTH 




WARDLEY HALL FROM THE SOUTH-EAST 

Photos by James Watts 



To face page 2O_ 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

i.e. about 1550. It is, of course, all of oak, with splendid carved newels 
and balusters, and of a most stately amplitude. Ten steps lead to the 
landing, from which it is possible to examine minutely the martyr's skull. 

Opposite the staircase opens the door of the panelled chamber, now 
used as a dining-room, which occupies the south-west corner of the 
quadrangle, and represents the ancient solar, or family withdrawing-room, 
abutting on the Great Hall. A more beautiful dining-room it has never 
been our fortune to visit. The oak-panelling round the walls rises to 
a richly carved cornice, upon which rest the huge moulded oak beams 
of the ceiling. Round the east side of the room runs an oak bench, 
worked into the panelling of the walls. This panelling is of the usual 
square Jacobean type. 

But let us go outside into the garden. The moat is of unusual width, 
and part of it has been filled up and forms a delightful sunken garden. 
The streams which feed the moat flow down into a deep ravine, the sides 
of which are beautifully planted with rhododendrons and other flowering 
shrubs, and beyond is a wood, bedded with bracken growing waist-high, 
where, within green recesses, it is easy to forget the coal-mines and 
the railways and the other symbols of " our national commercial pre- 
eminence," which surround one on every side. 

Colonel Hart-Davis has painted two charming views, taken across the 
moat, from the south-east and from the north-west respectively. Viewed 
from these two aspects, the old Hall, mirrored in the calm waters of the moat, 
looks extremely picturesque, with just that air of romance and mystery 
which beseem a house having so weird a reputation. It is well known 
that the wildest tales have been circulated about the Hall, known for 
nearly two hundred years as the " Skull House." and about the treasure 
it contains. It is said that if it is moved from its niche strange sounds 
are heard at night, and that the inhabitants have no peace until it is 
restored to its place. The head, indeed, it is said, defied an attempt to 
bury it, and, in a terrific storm of thunder and lightning, betook itself to 
the recess in the staircase wall. Thrown into the moat, it avenged itself 
by bringing on storms and disturbances of every sort, until the water was 
drawn off and it was recovered and replaced in the Hall. A recent writer 
says : " If anything was done to it, or it was not treated with proper 
respect, such commotions arose about the house that no one dared live in it. 
Windows were blown in, cattle pined in the stall, and the things were 
bewitched. . . . There is plenty of testimony to the ill-luck that has 
happened when the skull has been disturbed ; and this has not come 
from the superstitious only, but from shrewd observant men of business, 
whose word is as good as their bond." 

* Fletcher Moss, Pilgrimages to Old Home;, vol. ii. pp. 267-268. 

205 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

However this may be, Colonel Hart-Davis gives only the true story, 
which has, probably enough, given rise to all the others. 



THE STORY OF THE SKULL 

It was in the famous '45, when the Jacobite army under " Bonnie 
Prince Charlie " was encamped in a field near Wardley Hall, still known 
as the "Rebel Field," that the skull was first brought to light in the old 
house. Up to this date its history is conjectural. The Hall then was 
held by one Matthew Moreton on a life lease from the Lady Penelope 
Cholmondeley. It was this lady who sold Wardley in 1760 to Francis, 
Duke of Bridgewater, the ancestor of its present owners. She was the 
granddaughter of Richard, Earl of Rivers, who had married Penelope, the 
heiress of the Downes of Wardley. 

Moreton was a farmer, and as the Jacobites marched along Wardley 
Lane on their return to the North, a detachment visited the Hall to 
demand carts and horses for transport purposes. They threatened to fire 
the buildings unless their demands were complied with, so that, in spite 
of moat and raised drawbridge, the farmer had to yield. His son Matthew 
was sent with the carts and horses. But the Duke of Cumberland coming 
up with the Jacobites, young Moreton, to save his life, abandoned his 
property, and made his way home. The loss so impoverished the family 
that they determined to take up hand-loom weaving to retrieve their 
fortunes. 

" Moreton commenced to pull down a somewhat ruinous part of the 
building in order to make room for the looms, and as the work of 
demolition was proceeding, a box or chest fell out of the ruins. Thinking 
it to be a treasure-chest, he ordered the bystanders to stand back, and 
himself broke off the lid with a pick-axe. The box was found to contain 
a skull furnished with a goodly set of teeth, and having on it a good 
deal of auburn hair. 

" A maid-servant of the Moretons, knowing nothing about the 
skull, being set to clean the room in which it was kept, mistook it 
for the head of an animal and threw it into the moat. The same 
night there was a furious storm, .and Matthew Moreton, the younger, 
being a superstitious man, and having ascertained that the skull had 
been thrown into the moat, ascribed the storm to the indignity to which 
it had been subjected. He, therefore, at once caused the water to be run 
off, recovered the skull, and restored it to its place." So far Colonel 
Hart-Davis. 

The impression of the Moretons was that the skull belonged to a 
206 




THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 




THE OLD CHAPEL OF THE COMMANDERY, 
SANDFORD, WHERE THE MARTYR'S BODY 
WAS LAID (see p. 177) 



Ta face page 206 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

Catholic who had been executed for his faith during the times of 
persecution, and we shall see that this conjecture was substantially 
correct. 

Wardley Hall was sold by Thurstan Tyldesley in 1563 to the 
Sheringtons of London, and from them it passed, about 1601, to one 
Roger Downes. He came of an ancient Cheshire family, the Downes of 
Worth, who bore arms, on a field sable a stag lodged (or couchant) argent, 
that is, a white stag lying on a black shield. Roger was reader to Gray's 
Inn, and Vice-Chamberlain of Chester, and he represented the borough 
of Wigan in the Parliaments of 1601 and 1620. What is more important 
to us is that he was a kinsman of Sir Alexander Barlow, of Barlow Hall, 
near Manchester, the brother of our martyr. In his will, dated April 4, 
1 63 1, Sir Alexander nominates him overseer, together with Sir George 
Gresley, and speaks of him as his " loving cosen." Though Sir Alexander 
was a most devout Catholic, in fact, a confessor of the faith, it does not 
appear that his kinsman and executor was himself a Catholic, although 
the latter's wife, Anne Calvert of Cockerham, was certainly one. But just 
before he died, it is probable that Roger Downes of Wardley had the hap- 
piness of being reconciled to the Church of his fathers by the venerable 
Benedictine monk, Dom Richard Huddleston. Roger died in July 
1638, and we find that Francis, his eldest son and heir, was reconciled at 
this very time. No doubt the Catholic wife had long implored this grace 
for both husband and son. 

The good priest, whose ministry thus gave to the Church one of the 
most faithful of its sons, belonged to a branch of the old Catholic family 
of Huddleston of Sawston, settled at Farington Hall, near Leyland, 
County Lancaster. He was born there in 1583, and ordained priest at 
Douay in 1607. After labouring for some time on the English Mission, 
.he retired to the Continent, and was professed a Benedictine at the famous 
Abbey of Monte Cassino. There he spent some years in study and 
devotion by the tomb of the holy Patriarch St. Benedict, and then 
returned, like the Benedictine monks of old, to preach the Gospel of 
Christ in England. This was in 1 6 1 9, and he appears to have taken up 
his abode at Farington Hall, the residence of his brother Joseph. 
" Here, like another St. Austin endued with an evangelical spirit, he 
exercised his talents in preaching, teaching, disputing, and reducing his 
stray'd countrymen to the sheepfold of Christ. And it pleased ye Divine 
goodness to bless his endeavours and second his words with extraordinary 
success. In all, as well public debates as private conferences, he still 
came off a conqueror, in so much yt many chiefe families ... in 
Lancashire, with numberless others of all states and conditions, owe 
next to God their respective reconciliations to this worthy Benedictine." 

207 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Amongst the families, which the old chronicler we have quoted enumerates, 
is that of the Downes of Wardley Hall. 

In the good old Father's treatise, A Short and Plain Way to the Faith 
and Church, edited by his still more famous nephew, Dom John Dionysius 
Huddleston, O.S.B., we are told that the work "was long since composed 
for the medicinal instruction of a private friend," whom there is good 
reason to assume was Francis Downes. It was by help of this celebrated 
work that the latter was able to overcome the arguments of Sir Cecil 
Traffbrd, and win him to the faith. But the most illustrious conversion 
due to the good Benedictine's Short and Plain Way was that of King 
Charles II. It was while hidden in the apartments of Dom John 
Huddleston at Moseley House, after the battle of Worcester, that 
Charles perused the treatise, which was then still in manuscript. He 
acknowledged himself convinced ; and though, unhappily, he had not 
courage to proclaim his convictions to the world, yet, when he lay upon 
his deathbed, he was reconciled to the Church by that same Benedictine 
who had helped to screen him, and probably to save his life, at Moseley. 

It was Francis Downes who welcomed to Wardley his friend and 
kinsman, Edward Barlow, in religion, Dom Ambrose, O.S.B. As we 
shall see, Father Ambrose came from Douay in 1617 to labour on the 
mission in his native country. He ministered chiefly in the private and 
secret chapels in the Halls of Wardley and Morleys. At the latter Hall 
he was taken on Easter Sunday, 1641. After his martyrdom at Lancaster 
Castle, on September 10 of that same year, the martyr's sacred head was 
impaled on a spike, probably upon the tower of the old Collegiate Church 
of Manchester, now known as the Cathedral. From this place it must 
have been rescued by Francis Downes, just as that of Blessed Thomas 
More was ransomed by Margaret Roper from the gate of old London 
Bridge. And having secured the relic of his old chaplain, we can imagine 
how Mr. Downes would cherish it. He himself was then nearing his end, 
for his will is dated February 1643, and in it he declares himself to be 
" much impaired and weakened in body by a long consuming sickness." 
Nevertheless, he lived till 1648, when he was succeeded by his brother 
John, also an excellent Catholic, who, however, only survived him by 
a few weeks. Colonel Hart-Davis suggests that some epidemic was 
probably raging at the time, since John and his wife both died very soon 
after Francis, leaving a son, Roger, and a daughter, Penelope, the former 
being only a few months old. Poor little Roger and his sister, bereft of 
their natural guardians, were, according to the cruel laws of the time, 
brought up as Protestants. Nor did Roger do much credit to the new 
religion. He became one of the wildest blades at the Court of Charles II., 
and was finally killed by a watchman in a drunken brawl at Epsom Wells, 
208 




THE SKULL ON THE STAIRCASE 




THE STAIRCASE, WARDLEY HALL 

Photos by James Watts 



To face page 208 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

aged only twenty-eight. Thus the male line came to a sad and tragic 
end. 

We should not have thought it necessary even to mention poor 
Roger Downes, were it not that a comparatively modern popular tradition 
identified the skull of Wardley as belonging to this young rake, rather 
than to the martyr-priest. At least, one eighteenth-century tradition did 
so ; another, and older tradition, seems always to have asserted that it 
was the head of a " Father Ambrose." Fortunately the doubt was set 
at rest by the opening of Roger Downes's coffin in the family vault at 
Wigan, when it was found that the skeleton was perfect, head and all, 
except that the upper portion of the skull had been sawn off, just above 
the eyes, no doubt by the surgeon, who wished to ascertain the cause of 
death. This operation possibly gave rise to the tradition which connected 
the mysterious skull with this unfortunate young man. 

Thus, in the words of Mr. Joseph Gillow, the antiquary to whose 
researches we owe the identification of the skull, " the Hall passed into 
alien hands, and though the skull of the martyr was religiously respected, 
the local Catholic tradition concerning it had almost died out and given 
place to the worthless stories which the gullibility of Lancashire anti- 
quaries has perpetuated in the literature of the county." 



BARLOW HALL 

THE Saxon name of Barlow is thought by Whitaker to mark the locality 
as a favoured haunt of the wild boar, at a time when beasts of chase over- 
spread the country. 

Nothing could well have been more desolate than the site of Barlow 
Hall in those early days when the Saxon family of that name first made 
its abode there, on the wild northern moors where Lancashire and Cheshire 
meet. Fixing their home on a slope above the marshy levels of the 
Mersey, protected by the great belt of boggy and rush-grown land which ran 
through the district, the Barlows, no doubt, found that the situation had 
its advantages, and there, indeed, they took root, and for no less than 
seven hundred years grew and flourished. 

On the south of the Hall, the Mersey wound its sluggish course, 
while to the north there was a stretch of marshy ground, still known as 
Barlow Leys, while Barlow Wood is said to be the only remains now 
standing in the neighbourhood of the great Forest of Arden which 
stretched up well into these northern districts. 

The present Hall is interesting from its high antiquity rather than 
from any distinctive architectural merits. The original building probably 

2 D 209 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

dates from the time of Edward 1., but it is very doubtful if any part of 
the ancient house survived the rebuilding in the days of Elizabeth. 
In late years it has been sadly modernised and pulled about, partly 
owing to a disastrous fire during the late Sir William Cunliffe Brookes's 
tenancy, and the original outline of the house is almost lost in the mass 
of alterations and additions which have transformed and disfigured it. 

So far as can be made out, it consisted of the usual quadrangle erected 
in the quaint half-timbered style so characteristic of the neighbourhood, with 
the addition of a large wing built out at right angles to the Hall. " The 
framework consists of great oaken timbers, resting upon a foundation of 
solid masonry connected by beams, and strengthened by bracing ribs 
firmly bolted into the main timbers, filled with a composition of plaster of 
lime and mud, mixed with straw, and laid upon laths. Very little of the 
timber-work now remains exposed to view, the greater portion having 
been covered with plaster, and being also covered with ivy, as are many 
aged trees which stand around." 

The fire which occurred on March 19, 1879, nas necessitated much 
rebuilding, and it is difficult now to trace the original plan. Even 
the banqueting hall is mutilated by party-walls, and its splendid oriel 
now stands in a passage cut off from the room it was designed to light. 
The fire destroyed the beautiful panelling of this hall, only a fragment 
being preserved. There are some magnificent trees around the old 
house, even the modern parts of which have a venerable appearance 
owing to the ivy which covers it so profusely. The extensive grounds 
are now used as golf-links, and the old Hall itself has recently become 
the club-house. 

The neighbourhood is even more changed than the house itself. 
Now, as one walks from Manchester by Chorlton-cum-Hardy towards 
Didsbury and Cheadle, one is never out of sight of houses. The once 
desolate moor has become a busy and populous suburb ; miles of streets 
have sprung up in the immediate vicinity of the ancient home of the 
Barlows, and there are now more than ten thousand people living near 
the old house which was once so isolated. 

Yet, even to this day, Barlow Hall is fairly secluded. Situated close 
to the banks of the river, the wide fields surrounding it give it an air of 
aloofness from the busy hive of-men. 

Barlow Hall in ancient days was situated in the parish of Didsbury 
the parish church being more than two miles distant across the moor. In 
the reign of Edward I. it was owned by Sir Robert de Barlow. During the 
two hundred and fifty years that succeeded, the Barlows steadily increased 
in wealth and importance in the county, and their honourable name and 
position was equalled by their fidelity to the Catholic faith, a fidelity 
210 




t 






Pi 5 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

that was to be put to a rude trial in the days that were coming. "An 
intensely conservative family," says Mr. Fletcher Moss, " more than 
one of whose members sacrificed everything, even to life 'itself, for their 
faith." 

The Hall was rebuilt in or about the year 1574 by Alexander Barlow, 
Esquire, the then Lord of Barlow. This date is inscribed on the old 
sundial in the quadrangle, together with the beautiful and significant 
motto Lumen me regit, vos umbra* It is very probable, as Mr. Moss 
suggests, that this motto may have some reference to the frequent changes 
of faith which had then become so common in England. But the Barlow? 
at least were determined always to follow the light, even if their country- 
men preferred the shadow. 

Alexander Barlow was son and heir of Ellis Barlow of Barlow, and by 
his wife Elizabeth he had a son also called Alexander, and four daughters. 
His sister, Margaret Barlow, had married Edward, head of the house of 
Stanley, and third Earl of Derby. She died in February K59, leaving 
a son and two daughters. This brilliant match may be said to mark the 
climax of the fortunes of the house of Barlow. 

" In rambling through Barlow Hall only a short time ago," says a 
modern writer, f " we found a succession of tiny, silent bedrooms, each 
opening into its neighbour, and each also into a long, narrow, rickety 
corridor. From the corridor we could see, through square bits of coloured 
glass, traces of a quaint timbered court-yard, and learnt that this was the 
oldest part of the house, and these bedrooms were probably used by the 
four daughters of Alexander Barlow." 

Mr. Barlow had sat as member for Wigan in at least six Parliaments 
between 1547 and 1555, his devotion to the old Faith explaining his 
absence from the early Parliaments of Elizabeth. It was to his safe and 
faithful keeping that Laurence Vaux, the last Warden of the College at 
Manchester, and himself a glorious confessor for the faith, handed over 
the leases and other charters relating to the College lands, that they might 
be preserved until better times. Here, too, at Barlow, he spent many of 
the later years of his lite. 

As the times grew steadily more dark, and the position of Catholics, 
even in faithful Lancashire, more precarious, the Barlows had their full 
share of the cup of suffering. It is touching to read in the stained glass 
of the splendid oriel window of the Great Hall, the mottoes, "Frist en foyt 
and Respice Jinem, together with the initials, A.B., and the date 1574. 
No doubt Mr. Barlow chose them as guides in the darkness, and as 
encouragement to be constant to the end. This oriel window, in the 

* "The light rules me, the shadow rules you." 

t TallowjieU, by Mrs. W. C. Williamson. London, 1888. 

211 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

half-timbered quadrangle, has often been erroneously called the Chapel 
window. It is, of course, merely the usual bay-window in the banquet- 
ing hall. This courtyard is small, but very beautiful, and this part of 
the house is almost all that has survived the lapse of centuries and the 
devastation caused by the fire. 

In 1576, for prudential reasons, Mr. Barlow conveyed his estates in 
trust to his son-in-law, Edward Scarisbrick, of Scarisbrick, and five other 
feoffees. Not long after, the pursuivants descended upon Barlow Hall, 
and the peaceful home became the scene of all the horrors of a search for 
Popish priests. This took place on January 17, 1583. No priests were 
found, but the master of the house was seized and carried off to Salford 
gaol, although at the time he was too ill to sit upright on his horse. 
Here he was still, with many Lancashire Catholics, gentlemen, ladies, 
priests, and others, at the end of January 1584. He died in confinement, 
a valiant confessor of the faith an inscription on the portrait of his son, 
Sir Alexander, stating that he "died in pryson for the Catholyck 
religion." 

His eldest son, our martyr's father, was knighted, together with his 
eldest son (both Alexanders), at the coronation of James I. in 1603. 
Mr. Gillow says of this Sir Alexander Barlow, that he was perhaps the 
most notable representative of the family honours, and is recommended 
in the records of Douay as "that constant Confessor of Christ." 

A strange custom of our ancestors is exhibited in the story of his 
marriage. When only four years old, he was taken to church and 
solemnly espoused to an heiress, one Elizabeth Bellfield. However, 
twelve years later, the young man testified that he had never ratified the 
alleged marriage, for being so young he could remember nothing about 
it. It was therefore dissolved, and he afterwards took to wife one of 
his own choosing, Mary, daughter of Sir Uryan Brereton of Handforth, 
County Chester, Knight, by whom he had a large family. And of these 
Edward Barlow, the subject of this memoir, was the fourth son. 

Sir Alexander had his full share of persecution on account of his 
faith. " A true and perfect Recusant Catholic " as he styled himself in 
his will, in spite of royal honours, his name, together with those of his 
wife and children, occurs constantly on the Recusant Rolls, and after paying 
for many weary years the extortionate fine of 20 a month for his refusal 
to attend Protestant worship in the desecrated parish church, he actually 
came within the iniquitous Act by which James I. was empowered to 
refuse this monthly fine, and to take two-thirds of the Recusants' estates. 

* In a list of Recusants brought up before the Ecclesiastical Commissioners (dated 
February 14, 1584) Alexander Barlow's name occurs among those who had "conformed," 
but also among those who were " bound for their appearance." C.R.S., vol. v. pp. 70, 71. 
212 



"T 




THE QUADRANGLE, BARLOW HALL 

Photo by James 



To face fagc 212 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

What was even more intolerable soon followed. On January 19, 1609, 
the " benefit " of Sir Alexander's estates was granted to two of the 
King's needy favourites, William Markey and Thomas Webber, that 
they might get what they could out of them for themselves. 

This system, worthy of the unspeakable James, worked out as 
follows : Each individual favourite who grew clamorous for the royal 
Scot's bounty, was ordered to search out as many Catholics as possible, 
and to select from the more opulent those who were most likely to 
answer his purpose. The King, in his bounty, then " bestowed " these 
persons upon him, i.e. he made over to him whatever claims the Crown 
possessed, or might afterwards possess on them for the fines of recusancy ; 
and authorised him either to proceed at law for the recovery of the 
penalties, or to accept a grant of money by way of compensation for the 
amount. The " hungry Scots " and their fellows fastened like vampires 
on their prey. The State papers are full of these grants of " the benefit 
of Recusants." 

Sir Alexander Barlow died April 20, 1 620, and was buried by torch- 
light in the Collegiate Church of Manchester. It is not known why his 
wish as to his funeral expressed in his will (dated April 14, 1617) was 
not carried out. For in this testament he directed, " Yf yt fortune 1 die 
within twentye miles of my house of Barlowe, that my said bodye be 
leyde in Didsburye Churche as neere unto my father as may be." 

In this will he bequeathed to his wife, " my owne picture to keepe 
during her lyffe," with an injunction that it should afterwards remain as 
an heirloom at Barlow Hall. Here, indeed, it remained till the last of 
the Barlows died in 1773, when it was sold, but happily passed into the 
hands of Dr. James Barlow of Blackburn, who claimed to be descended 
from a junior branch of the family, and among his descendants it still 
remains. It has been engraved on copper, and the print that used to hang 
in Barlow Hall, when it was occupied by the late Sir William Cunliffe 
Brookes, Bart., is now in the possession of Mr. Joseph Gillow. He 
thus describes the picture : " A half-length portrait, holding a Primer or 
Manual in his left hand with the other uplifted, the words Tute si me et te 
apparently proceeding from his lips, and Ecce from the glory in the 
corner, with the supplication, Jesu Fill Dei miserere mei, Sancta Maria 
Mater Dei orapro me. On the left-hand side is a curious inscription, the 
lines in red and the lettering in gold. 

" It states that Sir Alexander was then sixty years of age (about 1 6 1 6 
therefore, the year that his martyr son made his vows at Douay), and 
that he was the son of Alexander Barlow, Esq., who died in prison for 
the Catholic religion. The names of his eight sons and six daughters, 
with some additional particulars, are also recorded, and after the names of 

213 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

William and Edward is the letter A, or some private mark, probably 
intended to note their religious profession." 

We may now leave Barlow Hall for the present to pay a visit to the 
" Old Church " at Didsbury, where Alexander Barlow, the elder, had 
been laid to rest. As Barlow was, in those days at least, situated in the 
parish of Didsbury, it was natural that the family should be buried there, 
even after the change of religion, for Catholics had then no graveyards 
or churches of their own in which they could be interred. And so "a 
true and perfect recusant Catholic," like Sir Alexander, found resting- 
place in the Protestant churchyard.* 

But something more serious still was the fact that his children 
had to pass through the form of "christening" in Didsbury Church. 
Even now, in the register, we may read the entry of the " christening " 
of Edward Barlow, our martyr, on the 3Oth of November Anno Domini 



n i ~ " c 3 

1585 "Edward the sonne of Alex. Barlowe gent." This was a necessary 
formal matter, but, no doubt, the children of such devout Catholics as 
Alexander and Mary Barlow had previously been baptized at home 
by a priest in accordance with the usual practice of Catholics in those 
penal days. 

It is a pleasant walk from Barlow Hall through the meadows by the 
Mersey banks to Didsbury Church. The Church itself is most dis- 

* Most probably without any funeral service, as an " excommunicate Recusant " 
Dr. Cox in his Parish Registm of England (1910) p. 106, says : "The persecution of the 
Recusants, that is, of those who clung to the old unreformed faith, was carried on relent- 
lessly even to the grave throughout the rcigri of Elizabeth ; though their burial at night 
without any rue was winked at in various parishes, particularly where they were numerous " 
rle gives many instances, e.g. at Hathersage, Where four were buried in 1629, four in i6<o 
and five in 163 1 all by night ! At Norbury, Derbyshire, there are three entries in the 
parish register for the year 1723, of interments without service. In two of these instances 
it is specified that the deceased were ' papists.' " (Ibid, p. 108). At Tamworth, 1644 we 
have the entry, " Catt into the ground the body of Ellen wife of Richard Ensor, a popping." 

2I 4 




PORTRAIT OF THE MARTYR'S FATHER 

From the print in possession of Mr. Joseph Gillow 



To face page 214 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

appointing. Successive " restorations " and rebuildings have destroyed 
almost every vestige of antiquity, and nothing but the old tower seems to 
speak of the times when an Alexander Barlow was Chaplain of Didsbury, 
or even of the later days when another Alexander was buried there 
beside his Catholic ancestors.* 

Fortunately, there are now keen and competent antiquaries living 
close to the poor old church, who will see that nothing more is destroyed 
of its few remaining relics of the past, and will lovingly gather together 
everything that industry, devotion and skill can discover of the history of 
the days that are gone.f 



HANDFORTH HALL 

Edward Barlow, as we have seen, was the fourth son of the fourteen 
children whom Mary Brereton of Handforth bore to Alexander Barlow. 
Among these children were two, who, like Edward himself, were destined 
to wear the Benedictine cowl : William (the third son, well known to 
history as the famous Doctor and Canonist, Dom Rudesind) and Robert, 
of whom little is known, save that he was professed at St. Gregory's, 
Douay, in 1630, and died in England some three years later. 

When Edward went abroad he had, according to the usual custom, 
to take another name, in order to escape the unwelcome attentions of the 
Government, and the name he chose to be known by was his mother's 
name of Brereton. 

It will be interesting to visit Handforth Hall, part of which, 
happily, still stands, and forms yet another shrine for the pilgrim of the 
martyrs. 

There is a ford with a ferry over the Mersey just below Barlow Hall, 
and thence it is about six miles, as the crow flies, in a south-easterly 
direction to Handforth Hall. We cross the fields and pass along the 
slopes of Northenden Moor, and then by Kenworthy Lane (past the 

* Didsbury Church, which dates from 1352, was rebuilt in 1620, and again in 1770, 
and was extensively "restored" in 1855 ! It can well be imagined how much of the 
ancient building remains. 

f To Mr. James Watts, of Abney Hall, and Mr. Fletcher Moss, of the Old Parsonage, 
Didsbury, the antiquaries to whom we refer above, we owe more than we can ever 
adequately acknowledge. Their delightful series of books entitled Pilgrimages to Old 
Homes, illustrated with Mr. Watts's magnificent photographs, are a joy to all who love 
the ancient houses of England. Their devotion to our martyr is as great as if they 
shared the faith for which he died, and without their assistance this record must have lost 
more than half its interest. We have already acknowledged the illustrations which they 
have so kindly lent us. 

215 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

modern Catholic Church of St. Hilda) to Northenden. A short walk 
brings us to Cheadle, and the London road, which we take for three or 
four miles more, until we come to Handforth Church. The Hall is a 
little to the east of the railway station (the London and North- Western 
Railway line here runs parallel to the road) and stands in dignified 
seclusion aloof from the modern houses, the Nonconformist Chapel, and 
the deplorable bleaching and dyeing works which have recently disfigured 
the charming valley of the Dean. 

Handforth Hall itself, like so many ancient and dignified manor 
houses, is now a farm. The old avenue still leads to it, and hard by is 
a pleasant stream and what was once the village green. 

It is a grand old half-timbered house, but the portion to the left of 
the porch is a modern imitation. All to the right is ancient. Two noble 
gables remain, with magnificently carved barge-boards. The oak carving 
throughout the house is really magnificent. Curiously enough (though 
we have noticed the same phenomenon elsewhere), the woodwork has 
weathered far better on the north side than on the south. 

The half-timbered work is very beautiful, and makes Handforth Hall 
worthy to find a place among the many fine old Cheshire manor houses 
built in this style. 

But the unique glory of Handforth is the porch. This is a splendid 
piece of oak work, most elaborately carved, and still in an extraordinary 
state of preservation. On either side of the doorway the great oak posts 
are carved with arabesques, surmounted by the coat of arms of the family, 
on which the Handforth (or Honford) star is still prominent. The crest is 
a bear's head, muzzled, for Brereton. 

The star borne by the Handforths commemorates the Crusades, when, 
according to the legend, a star fell from heaven in front of the armies of 
Saladin, which Handforth of Handforth instantly seized and fixed to 
his shield, and thus it became the cognisance of his race. Above, along 
the lintel of the doorway, is carved in Gothic lettering the following 
inscription : 

This haulle was buylded In the yeare oj 

Oure Lord God m.ccccc.lxii. 

by Uryan \ Breretoun Knight Whom maryed 

Margaret daughter and heyre of JVyllyam 

Handforth \ of Handforthe Esquyer and 

had Issue vi. sonnes and it. daughters 

Below the inscription is some charming scroll-work, which shows a 
briar and a tun (or barrel), and thus forms a rebus of the name Brereton. 
This ornament is continued all round the jambs of the doorway. 
216 




THE PORCH, HANDFORTH HALL 

Photo by James Watts 



To Jace page 216 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

The most striking feature of the interior is a magnificent oak stair- 
case, far more elaborate and beautiful even than that at Wardley. In the 
side of this stairway is a hiding-hole. 

The history of Margaret Handforth, whose marriage to Sir Uryan 
brought Handforth and all its broad acres to the Breretons, is a strange 
and romantic one. 

Her father, William Handforth, the last of his race, fell at Flodden 
Field, September 9, 1513. His twelve-year-old daughter and heiress 
was immediately married to the gallant young knight, Sir John Stanley, 
who, though only seventeen years of age, had commanded at Flodden 
the forces of his father, James Stanley, Bishop of Ely and Warden of 
Manchester. He had won his spurs at the great battle, and it may well 
be that he won his bride there too. Two years later the Bishop died, 
and Sir John completed the building of the great Derby or Stanley 
Chapel, on the north side of the Collegiate Church at Manchester, which 
his father had begun. Over the door of this Chapel may still be seen the 
shield of arms of Sir John (the stags' heads and eagles' feet of the Stanleys, 
impaled with the seven-rayed star of the Handforths) and the half-defaced 
inscription in Latin : Vanitas vanUatum, omnia vanitas. 

"We beseech you that you aid us, James, Bishop of Ely, John 
Stanley, knight, and Margaret his wife, and the parents of them, with 
your prayers to Jesus Christ, who built this Chapel in His name and in 
honour of St. John the Baptist, in the year of the Incarnation, 1513." 

The date of the battle is given, probably because the Chapel was built 
in fulfilment of a vow made during the campaign. 

Later on Sir John fell into disgrace with Cardinal Wolsey, who had 
him imprisoned in the Fleet. But he does not seem to have needed this 
reminder that all earthly pride and wealth was vanity : at any rate, he 
determined to bid farewell to this world and all it could offer him. He 
therefore made his will (it is dated June 30, 1527) in which he disposed 
of all he had, making many donations to the churches of Manchester and 
Cheadle, among others, and leaving " penny doles to be given to poor 
widows, poor maidens, and poor persons who would say a paternoster, 
ave, and a credo for him, or pray for the souls of his father, himself, and 
his wife, and for William Handforth, Ellen and Anne Stanley." A priest 
was to sing Mass daily for the repose of their souls. He then obtained 
letters of fraternity for himself and wife and children from the Abbot of 
Westminster, whereby they became entitled to the prayers of the Convent 
for ever, and to have their names enrolled among the obits read out after 
the Martyrology in Chapter ; and then he and his wife petitioned for a 
divorce that they might devote themselves to the religious life.* 

* See Fletcher Moss, Chronicles of Cheadle, Cheshire (1894.), pp. 35 et uq. 
2 E 217 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

On June 25, 1528, their case was examined by the ecclesiastical 
authorities in the sacristy of St. Paul's Cathedral, London. They having 
made their petition to be permitted to separate in order to enter holy 
religion, this was accorded to them, and Sir John Stanley forthwith 
became a monk at Westminster. 

He had literally fulfilled the counsel of Our Blessed Lord, and given 
up home and wife, children and lands for Christ's sake and the Gospel's, 
and we cannot doubt that he received the promised reward. The re- 
ligious houses of England were soon to be destroyed by the tyrant, and 
their inmates driven forth from their peaceful retreats, but it would 
seem that Sir John had the happiness of dying before the evil day 
dawned. 

" What a strangely chequered life he had," observes Mr. Moss. 
"He was a noble scion of a distinguished race, emphatically a warrior 
and a saint. After charging like a whirlwind round the Scottish hosts 
on Flodden, he was married to a little child, and after his unjust and 
arbitrary imprisonment, he surrendered all that he had at the early age 
of thirty-two, and became a poor monk, and died quietly in a cloistered 
cell." 

His young wife had a very different fate. We may suspect that her 
vocation to the religious state was not altogether spontaneous, but rather 
the outcome of the influence of the stronger will and more fervent faith 
of her husband. No doubt she must have entered the cloister, but it is 
very possible that she never made her vows. In any case, within ten 
years or so, she must have been thrust again into the world, through 
the Dissolution of the Religious Houses. A widow now, still young and 
an heiress, she was not likely to be permitted long to remain single. 

At any rate, we know that she married, as her second husband, Sir 
Uryan Brereton, ninth son of Sir Randle Brereton of Shochlach and 
Malpas Hall, who thereby became the new Lord of Handforth. She, 
who was the widow of a monk, was to become the grandmother of three 
more Benedictines, and her life forms an interesting link between the 
old monasticism of England and its revival in the teeth of the penal 
laws. 

At Cheadle Church, the parish to which Handforth belongs, the 
Chapel at the end of the south aisle is known as the Handforth or 
Honford Chapel. It is screened off to the west and north by admirable 
Perpendicular screen-work, which is evidently the work of Sir Uryan 
Brereton. The breast-summer is in fact carved with his rebus, the briar 
and the tun, and the initials V.B. also appear on it. The Chapel itself 
seems to have been built by Sir John Stanley. Two fine recumbent 
alabaster effigies of knights that lie within are believed by Mr. Moss, 
218 




HANDFORTH HALL 

Photo by James Watts 



To face page 218 






THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

with good reason, to be those of Sir John himself, and of his father-in- 
law, William Handforth. In the east window of the Chapel Sir John 
Stanley's arms may still be seen, though the inscription that begged for 
prayers for his own soul and those of his relatives, in similar terms to 
that at Manchester, has unhappily disappeared. The roof of the Chapel 
is exceedingly fine, and on it the star of the Handforths still glows 
resplendent. While lingering in Cheadle Church (which seems to have 
been entirely rebuilt between 1520 and 1556), we cannot omit to mention 
that the chancel was built by another Benedictine, no less a person, in 
fact, than the Lady Katharine Bulkeley, last Abbess of Godstow, near 
Oxford. She built the chancel and glazed the window at her own 
expense in the year 1 556, during the brief restoration of Catholic worship 
under Queen Mary, and was buried there on February 13, 1559, just 
after the accession of Elizabeth, but happily before that queen had 
succeeded in effecting the change of religion, so that the good old Abbess 
was laid to rest with the ancient rites that she so dearly loved. She was 
a daughter of Rowland Bulkeley, Esquire, of Cheadle. 

Alas ! the stained windows that commemorated her family, the fair 
high altar, the holy images and sacred ornaments that she had provided, 
were soon broken down " with axes and hammers," and even her humble 
request for prayers for the repose of her soul was not spared by the 
heartless fanatics who profited by her charity. 

But to return to Handforth Hall. As we have seen, the present 
house was built in 1562, twenty-three years before the birth of Edward 
Barlow. From this very house then his mother passed forth as a bride, 
and to this house her martyr son must often have made his way, as a 
boy, to pay a visit to his kinsmen there. We have approached it, as he 
would have done, by ford and field and ancient highway from Barlow 
Hall, but the modern pilgrim will find it easier to visit it from 
Manchester by rail, as it stands close to a railway station. 

It is strange that Sir William Brereton, the great-grandson of Sir 
Uryan, was a notable Roundhead General, and the last person likely to 
sympathise with "Popish Recusants." He was born in 1604, the year 
that Edward Barlow entered the English College at Valladolid, and, 
judging by his subsequent career, it seems extremely improbable that 
our martyr can ever have visited Handforth Hall after his return to 
England as a priest. Certainly, we must dismiss as quite impossible the 
theory that has been put forward as to this old house having been 
one of his " stations " as a missionary. We are, indeed, expressly told 
by his contemporary biographer that he confined his priestly labours to 
the Lancashire side of the Mersey, and refused to work in Cheshire. 

Sir William Brereton, the famous Parliamentary General, died shortly 

219 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

after the Restoration, April 7, 1661. He was a strong Puritan, with an 
intense dislike for prelacy, and the Royalists reported of him that he 
was " a notable man at a thanksgiving dinner, having terrible long teeth 
and a prodigious stomach, to turn the Archbishop's Chapel at Croydon 
into a kitchen, also to swallow up that palace and lands at a morsel." 

His son, Sir Thomas, who succeeded him, was the last of the 
Breretons of Handforth. There is a monument to him in the Handforth 
Chapel in Cheadle Church, just west of the two alabaster figures already 
referred to. 

The Barlows, on the other hand, were as loyal to their King as to 
their faith, so that it was more than the Mersey that separated Barlow 
Hall from Handforth in the days of Charles I. 



DOUAY 

THERE is an old saying, "In Cheshire Leghs are thick as fleas," which, 
though not very refined nor very respectful to a great family, has the 
merit of being true. Our martyr was closely connected with the chief 
stem of this family-tree, since his paternal grandmother was Elizabeth, 
daughter and co-heiress of George Legh of High Legh Hall, the very 
centre and heart of the Legh country. The Hall lies half-way between 
Warburton and Arley, the seat of the Egerton-Warburtons, and about 
three and a half miles from either. Here, embowered in trees, is an 
ancient chapel standing in the grounds of the Hall. In one of the old 
stained-glass windows there is a representation of Thomas Legh of High 
Legh, the founder, and his wife, Isabella Trafford, with their arms 
emblazoned on their mantles. The date is 1581. 

At the age of twelve Edward Barlow was taken from school to be a 
page in the house of his kinsman, Sir Uryan Legh of High Legh, in 
Cheshire. It was the common practice of the time for the sons of gentry 
thus to serve their apprenticeship, as it were, in the hall of some nobleman 
or gentleman of note, but, in this case, it would seem that the custom 
might have led to disastrous consequences. For Sir Uryan was a 
Protestant, and the influence of a conforming household could not but 
have a pernicious influence on the faith of the Catholic boy who was 
exposed to it. Why his parents should entrust their son to a Protestant 
lord we cannot tell ; possibly, they had little or no choice in the matter. 
In 1597 the persecution was at its height, and one of the favourite plans 
of the Government was to tear Catholic children from their homes, and 
to hand them over to Protestants to be brought up in the State religion. 

* The Myesterees o f the Good Old Cause (1663), p. 3. 
220 




h 
rt 
O 
fc 
P 



< 
hJN 

^^ 

w 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

However this may be, we learn from an intimate friend who wrote 
The Apostolical Life of Ambrose Barlow, that our martyr himself told him of 
his conversion, which, he says, " I had more cause than ordinary to 
remember ; for he said that a certain lady who was the widow of Sir 
William Davenport, and mother of the now Lord Chief Baron of the 
Exchequer, was the cause of his conversion and my father's about the 
same time, her residence being then near unto his sister Talbot's,* which 
I think is not many miles from the place where he suffered for his 
conscience." 

This good lady, who was thus instrumental in bringing back the 
future martyr to the practice of his holy faith, was Margaret, daughter of 
Richard Assheton of Middleton in Lancashire. She was the wife of 
Sir William Davenport of Bramhall, Cheshire ; her third son was 
Sir Humphrey Davenport, the famous judge. Middleton is just north 
of Manchester, so that the Asshetons and the Barlows were near neigh- 
bours. Her name deserves to be held in benediction, since but for her 
the noble army of Christ's martyrs might have lost one of its bravest 
knights. 

Edward Barlow was not content with returning to the faith : he 
longed to give himself more perfectly to God. " As he grew up, and 
considered the emptiness and vanity of the transitory joys of this life, 
and the greatness of things eternal, he took a resolution to withdraw 
himself from the world, and to go abroad, in order to procure those 
helps of virtue and learning which might qualify him for the priesthood, 
and enable him to be of some assistance to his native country." He was 
approaching manhood, if indeed he had not already passed his twenty- 
first year. 

Dr. Dee records in his diary that in 1597 he lent to Mr. Barlow a 
Spanish grammar for the use of his son. This son will probably have 
been William, who was then preparing to complete his education on the 
Continent, but possibly it was Edward himself. 

The place he naturally turned his eyes to was Douay, the College 
of his fellow countryman, William Cardinal Allen, the training-ground 
of so many valiant athletes and the seed-plot of so many martyrs. 
Thither his brother William, only nine months his senior, had gone 
before him, and after making his studies there, had been professed 

* Margaret Barlow married John Talbot of Salesbury, County Lancaster. These 
Talbots were a younger branch of the Talbots of Bashall, who had a martyr of their own, 
the Venerable John Talbot, who suffered in 1600. Salesbury Hall is about a mile east of 
Ribchester, and about two and a half miles south-west from Stonyhurst. Salesbury 
formerly belonged to the Clitherows, and passed by heiresses to the Talbots. John 
Talbot, our martyr's brother-in-law, was born in 1608. His daughter and heiress, 
Dorothy, born in 1650, married Edward Warren of Poynton, County Chester. 

221 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

a Benedictine monk at Cella Nuova in Galicia, under the name of Dom 
Rudesind. He was already, it would seem, ordained priest, and was 
studying for his Doctor's degree at Salamanca. 

To Douay, then, Edward Barlow made his way : a journey not 
without peril in those days, when to seek Catholic education abroad was 
as great a crime as to provide it at home. " Here," says Challoner, 
" meeting with two other young gentlemen of equal age, and of the same 
inclinations, he chose them for his chamber-fellows, and with them 
frequented the humanity schools at Anchin College, under the Fathers 
of the Society, as the alumni of the English Seminary all did during 
Dr. Worthington's presidency." 

We do not know the date of his arrival at Douay, and so cannot tell 
how long he stayed there. No doubt his Latin had grown very rusty, 
as he had left school at so early an age, and a young man of twenty-three 
does not find it so easy to set himself again to the study of grammar and 
syntax. But he persevered, and in 1610 he was sufficiently advanced to 
be able to begin his philosophy. He was sent by Dr. Worthington 
to make these studies at the English College at Valladolid, where the 
Benedictine martyrs, Barkworth and Roberts, had studied before him. 
He was admitted there, with a companion, on September 20, 1610. His 
age was put down in the College register as twenty-three, but he was in reality 
nearly twenty-five. He was known by the alias of Brereton, his mother's 
maiden name. Here he studied philosophy for two years, and then was 
sent back to Douay, " partly," says the Register, " on account of ill- 
health." The " partly " is interesting, for it suggests that there was 
another reason, and we cannot doubt that this was his Benedictine 
vocation. The Benedictine revival was in the air, and was greatly 
exciting the minds of all who were interested in the future of English 
Catholicism. We have recounted in the life of the Ven. John Roberts 
the conflicts which it engendered in the College at Valladolid. The 
echo of those conflicts can hardly have died out in 1610, and even if they 
were almost forgotten, the martyrdom of Dom John Roberts, on 
December 10 of that year, must have aroused new enthusiasm among the 
students for the ancient Order to which England owed her faith. 

Already in July 1609, the theological faculty of Salamanca, where 
Dom Rudesind Barlow was studying, had given its formal opinion that 
the English monks could undertake the work of the Mission in their 
country, as there was nothing in their state to hinder such a work. 
Pope and King had alike sanctioned the establishment at Douay of a 
Benedictine House, dedicated to St. Gregory the Great, Apostle of 
England, where the English monks who belonged to the Spanish Con- 
gregation of the Order could find a home, which was to be at once a 

222 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

monastery, a college, and a training-school for those of their number 
who desired to follow in the steps of the first missioners to the English 
race. In the October of the year 161 1 the monks were able to move into 
the monastery built for them by the generosity of Abbot Cavarel of St. 
Vedast's, which was to be their home until the Great Revolution drove 
them back to their native shores. 

It was, then, to the new monastery of St. Gregory at Douay, already 
illustrious through the martyrdom of its first prior and founder, that 
Edward Barlow directed his steps when he left Spain. Thither, his 
brother, Dom Rudesind, had preceded him in 1611. He was not,, 
however, originally destined for the Monastery of St. Gregory. 

In 1611 Dom Gabriel Giffbrd, afterwards Archbishop of Rheims, a 
very notable man, who had been Head Chaplain to Cardinal Allen and 
to St. Charles Borromeo, and also Dean of Lille, before he took the 
Benedictine habit, was sent by his Superiors to Spain to solicit help for 
the English monks. Tarrying at Saint Malo for a ship, he and his com- 
panion were induced by the Bishop of that town to settle there. Dr. 
Gifford was appointed theologian to the Bishop, and attached to this 
position was a house which would serve tor a temporary monastery. 
Thus a new English foundation was made ; and to this monastery, which 
was placed under the invocation of St. Benedict, Edward Barlow went 
from Douay, early in 1614, to beg the monastic habit. He was clothed 
in due course, and became a novice under the name of Br. Ambrose. 
But for some reason or other, after nine months' stay at Saint Malo, he 
asked to be permitted to return to Douay, on the plea of completing his 
theological studies. Perhaps one reason for this change was that his brother, 
Dom Rudesind, had been made Prior of St. Gregory's in 1614. At any 
rate it appears that he was again clothed with the habit by his brother 
on January 4, 1615, and that the Convent of Saint Malo gave up their 
right to him as a member of their house on September 20 of that year. 

Dom Ambrose (as we must henceforth call him) made his solemn 
vows as a Benedictine monk on January 5, 1615, and was afterwards 
incorporated into the monastery of Cella Nuova, in Galicia, where his 
brother had been professed. We learn these facts from the MS. collec- 
tion of Dom Athanasius Allanson, the annalist of the Congregation. 

The monastery of Saint Malo was not destined to endure, at least as 
an English foundation. Owing to various difficulties it was sold to the 
Maurist Fathers in 1672. During its uneventful history of sixty-one 
years, only fourteen choir monks were professed. Thus it seems 
providential that the future martyr should have been transferred to a 
community which still endures, and cherishes his memory as one of its 
chiefest glories. 

223 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 



THE MISSION 

DOM AMBROSE BARLOW was ordained priest in 1617, and soon afterwards 

was sent to labour on the English Mission. 

Of his wonderful apostolic life we have many precious details written 
down by some of those who knew him best. Challoner's moving account 
of our martyr is taken from two MS. relations which were in the hands 
of his brethren at Douay, one of them being a letter of his brother Dom 
Rudesind to the Abbot and monks of Cella Nuova, dated January i, 
1642. The materials for much of Dom Rudesind's letter are taken from 
a MS. now in the library of Manchester College, which has lately been 
printed by the Chetham Society.* It is entitled The Apostolical Life of 
<i/fmbrose Barlow, and is written by a friend and penitent of our martyr's, 
in the form of a letter to his brother, Dom Rudesind. There is no clue 
to the identity of the writer, except that he says that his father was 
converted about the same time as the martyr, through the instru- 
mentality of the same lady, Margaret Davenport. The little book 
(it consists of only 38 MS. pages in small quarto) is extremely touching 
and interesting, and we shall make no apology for quoting largely 
from it.f 

Father Barlow naturally turned to his native country, and it was in 
Lancashire that he spent the last twenty-four years of his life. He was 
now over thirty years old, the age when our Blessed Lord began His 
Ministry, and was "well qualified both by virtue and learning for the 
apostolic calling." Knaresborough says that " his memory is held in great 
esteem to this day in Lancashire, for his great zeal in the conversion of 
souls and the exemplary piety of his life and consecration." 

He went home to Barlow Hall at first, as was natural. We have a 
characteristic story of his home-coming. His biographer writes to Dom 
Rudesind : " He was such a lover of the purity which he professed, 
that upon his coming home, when your deare mother and his went 
towards him, as if she would have saluted him, he told me that he did 
runne backe till he came to the wall, by which she understood that he 
had received holy orders and the Sacred Kisse of Our Saviour : no more 
to be toucht by any creature." 

But he did not intend to remain in comfort among the loved ones at 
home, and it was not long before Divine Providence opened to him a 
field for his labours, which, though in the neighbourhood of his home, 

* Edited by W. E. Rhodes, M.A., 1908. 

f A MS. copy was kindly given to the writer by Mr. Sutton, Librarian of the Free 
Library, Manchester, some time before its publication. 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

gave him the independence which was necessary for his apostolic labours. 
No doubt he often visited his home ; and we may be sure that he con- 
soled the last moments of his good father, who died full of years and 
merits in 1620. 

The principal place of his residence was the old hall of Morleys, in 
Astley, in the parish of Leigh, about seven miles from Manchester and 
about as far from Barlow. The owner of Morleys was Mr. (afterwards 
Sir Thomas) Tyldesley, the famous knight, sans peur et sans reproche, who 
was Major-General in the royal army, and Governor of Lichfield. He 
was slain at the Battle of Wigan Lane in 1 65 1 . Sir Thomas was a devout 
Catholic, as all his forbears had been. His grandfather, Thomas Tyldesley 
of Morleys Hall, and Myerscough Lodge, Preston (near Claughton-on- 
Brock) was himself a grandson of Thurstan Tyldesley of Wardley Hall, 
where Father Barlow's kinsmen, the Downes, now resided. 

This older Thomas Tyldesley was specially obnoxious to the Eliza- 
bethan Government, and Lord Burghley has placed a cross against 
Morleys Hall on his famous map of Lancashire, to signify that its owner 
was a specially stiff Papist and would require extra coercion.* In a 
report presented to the Privy Council in 1591 it is said that" his children 
and family are very greatly corrupted, and few or none of them come to 
the church." His widow, Elizabeth, daughter of Christopher Anderton 
of Lostock Hall, was reported to Lord Burghley in 1598 as "one of the 
most obstinate " Recusants ; and so she continued till the day of her death. 
She survived until our martyr came on the Mission, for we are told that 
he assisted her at her death, and she left a pension of 8 a year to a 
priest that would take the charge of the poor Catholics in the neighbour- 
hood of her residence. This charge was undertaken by our martyr him- 
self, and he, therefore, with the consent of Sir Thomas, took up his 
abode at Morleys. Of the 8 a year he gave 6 to the poor man with 
whom he lodged, for his diet, though he was almost always absent for a 
fourth part of the year. 

" For his custome was to be three weekes at home, the fourth in 
circuit, excepting onely the weeke in Advent. At two places of his circuit 
I have beene with him ; the one was a widdow's house (who is a tenant 
of my Lord Stranges) some twenty miles from Morleys where there was 
a great number of people. That widdow's house is very near a parke of 
my Lord Molineux,f whose good father (though then a Protestant) gave 
his horses leave to feed in that parke of his." 

* C.R.S. Miscellanea, vol. iv. pp. 162, 172, 207. 

f Sir Richard Molyneux of Croxteth Hall, and of Sefton Hall. His son, Richard, was 
created Viscount Molyneux of Maryborough in 1628, and the family remained Catholic 
till 1769. 

2 F 225 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Another station of his must have been Wardley Hall, the residence of 
his kinsman, Roger Downes, where, as we have seen, his head is still pre- 
served. Even at Morleys he was by no means left in peace. He incurred 
the odium of some rich heretics who sublet the estate of Morleys for 
Tyldesley (who himself lived far away at Myerscough Lodge), by informing 
him of their extorting exorbitant rents from the poor Catholic tenants. 
This he did partly for the sake of the poor, partly out of gratitude to the 
gentleman who lent him his house gratis. " After that, those heretickes, 
as well for this, as for their hatred to Religion, laboured (as he conceived) 
the more, by threats and devices to fright him from thence, or to get him 
thrust out of doores or taken ; so that upon a time when their rage was 
great, he desired me to go to Mr. Tyldesley from him, to inform him of 
the treuth of some things. Which I did, who thereupon was so well 
satisfied with our martyr's real dealings and fidelity, that he promised 
(and like an honest gentleman performed) that he would not bid him 
begone ; although (as he said) that they had informed him that Mr. 
Barlow was a man obnoxious to the State. Our martyr, in great gratitude, 
had much repaired his house, and at that time he promised by me to 
bestow at least 40 shillings a yeare in the repaire of it. He lived in the 
worst part of it by farre, leaving the other for his guests, for whom he had 
furnished (as I thinke) four roomes with beds." 

Unhappily, Morleys Hall has been pulled down, and nothing now 
remains to remind us of the martyr. 

" Once when some of the gentry came to him for help, and to lodge 
with him, his words of entertainement I must not forget, which were, 
' You must not be offended with our clownishness, for we are all clowns." 
Now indeed there were still (besides his servant and the poore man that 
tabled him), some one poor Catholicke or more that wanting services he 
gave lodging into, working there for his living. But surely he though 
apparelled in their fashion, was not so esteemed, but for a devout follower 
of his maister, a true lover of poverty, who would be poore in his 
clothes, poore in his lodging, accompanied by the poore, whom he 
served againe, and whose poore diet he chose to eat : for although God 
had put into his hands (as I thinke) enough wherewithal to have played 
the housekeeper, he chose rather to subject himselfe, and become a 
sojourner with a poore man and -his wife to avoide thereby (as I did 
conceive) distractive sollicitude and dangerous dominion, and to expose 
sensuality to be curbed with the simple provision of poore folkes, and 
this I thinke was no small matter ; at least, 1 and many others (I assure 
myself) were much edified with it, knowing his poore and patient manner 
of living, and so will that partie be (I hope) whom wee heard to say that 
he could have plates enough if he would live upon curds and butter- 
226 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

milke. Which milke our martyr oft was contented with insteed of drink, 
when the poore folkes thought their beer (which was small as could be 
made) was too new. . . . His diet was for the most part white meat ; yet 
as he did not use to ask for this or that, but contenting himself with what- 
soever they provided, so he did not refuse to eate a litle of their flesh meates 
when God sent it ; and thereupon he said unto me once, that if God should 
send a venison pastre, he would not refuse to eat of it. Indeed the best 
part of his sustenance was usually of spoone-meat, that if it were not for 
some other reason, that perhaps was a cause that he did drinke so little, 
which for quantity was the least that ever I knew a man to live with. 
Once after dinner, he used those words unto me : ' You see that I have 
eaten well, yet verily I rise as hungry as when I sat downe.' Of bread 
he had his choice, for commonly there was a fair browne loafe and a 
ionacke. He fasted Advente, and because of that (as he said unto me) 
he kept home that moneth. 

" Notwithstanding his infirmities, I never knew him to tamper with 
the physicians ; surely he was to himself Dr. Diet, Dr. Quiet, and the 
onely Dr. Merriman that ever I knew. I remember he told me that 
when he returned into England (being then either weake with austerity 
or of a consumption), he went to Dr. More, and desired him out of 
charity to tell a poore priest what course he had best to take to be 
recovered of a consumption ; and his answer was, 'Goe into your owne 
country and for your physicke drinke a morning a messe of new milke 
and eat a roasted apple at night, which physicke now and then he used. 
How many yeares above twenty he lived after that, till he yielded to die 
of the consumption of charitie, I did not know, . . . but by a notable thing 
which he told me at Easter was two yeares, I knew it to be above 
twenty, and it was this : That he had bin above twenty yeares in 
England and no one day thereof omitted to celebrate, and I beleeve that 
many dales besides Christ-masse he had occasion to celebrate oftner 
than once, for the help of his charge ; for so one Christopher Bate (who 
for diverse yeares out of devocion had served him) told me and some- 
what more which was this, saying : ' That so long as Mr. Barlow was 
able he would not ride, but still went on foot with a long stafFe on his 
backe like a countryman ; and then (quoth he) he tooke mightie paines ; 
for he would have gone sometimes to severall places in a morning to 
say masse; and after that to another, I know -not how farre off that 
night, and (as I think) he also said that our martyr was too hard for him 
at that time ; yet he was broughte so weake againe, that with but riding 
a foot-pace a short day's journey, he found himself very weary at night, 
as he told me himselfe." 

It is very interesting to hear that our martyr sometimes said Holy 

227 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Mass several times in one day, but this does not seem to have been so 
uncommon in England in the days of persecution, where priests were 
few and the harvest very plenteous. The discipline of the Church ot 
our own day is against it on account of the abuses to which such a 
practice might give rise, and if we may believe a report made by a 
Roman envoy of the state of religion in England during the reign ot 
Charles II., these abuses were already a subject of complaint. 

However, there can have been no such suspicion of avarice in the 
case of so apostolic a man as Dom Ambrose Barlow. But to continue 
the narration : 

" Whereas I said that our martyr was a sojourner and no house- 
keeper, so I say he was never without a servant, yet would be no 
maister, God providing servants for him, who out of devotion would 
waite on him, and thus he had all the good offices done for him better 
than for others that provide for themselves, and for their domineering 
give wages ; yet he gratis used to bestow on his man yearely as much 
frise as would make him a suite, and though (as I have said) he was so 
well served by them when they did serve him, yet it was no litle (I 
think) that God mortified him therein ; for they doing it voluntarily, and 
at their owne charges, in a manner, by paying for their diet, so they did 
often leave him, and I am sure it was so since I came acquainted with 
him ; for I have knowne two within a litle space to hold this course, as 
now the one and then the other againe, the former and then the latter ; 
and this changing and inconstancy of theirs that usually makes others 
angry, made him merrie ; for as the old man said, he turned all that 
came to a jest. Certainly God had given him the perfect habitt of 
indifference, which I might perceive in his carriage towards me, for when 
I had beene with him for some time, and the humour had taken me to 
goe home, he would never have persuaded me to stay, but asking when 
I thought to come againe he bad me farewell merrily, and as merrily 
welcome when I returned, with pretty jest. . . . 

" Our martyr was so mild, witty and chearefull in his conversation, 
that, of all men that ever I knew, he seemed to me the most lively to 
represent the spirit of Sir Thomas More. His infirmities and labours were 
often great, but did not alter him, nor robbe him of his cheerefulness. 
Neither did I ever see him mou'd at all upon occasion of wrongs, 
slaunders or threats which was frequently raised against him : but as one 
insensible of wrong, or free from choller, he entertained them with a 
jest, and past over them with a smile and a nod. A certaine grave man 
and an old Penitent of his being present, when there was told him of 
the threats of some neighbouring Heretickes ; which he received after 
his wonted fashion, making himself and us recreation with it. The old 
228 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

man, rownding with me, said : In sooth, I have knowne Mr. Barlow a 
great while, and this has beene still his custome, to turne whatsoever 
happened unto him to a jest, using other words to this purpose, as 
arguing him of invincible patience. How long it was from the time of 
their acquaintance I do not remember, nor is it materiall, but sure it was 
on one of St. James's days, when they were both prisoners in Lancaster. 
I certainly remember he showed that old man the way to heaven, and 
took him into the Church." 

For it must not be supposed that even in this faithful part of 
Lancashire the priest of God had no persecutions to undergo. Once 
when he was describing his many adventures and hair-breadth escapes to 
his biographer, the good man said to him : " I wonder how you escaped 
from being a martyr," to which he replied : " I have bidden as fair for it 
as another." And then he told him that he had been no fewer than four 
times in prison, and that when he was in Lancaster Castle the ministers 
nocked about him, and he told them thereon. As a matter of fact he 
lived for more than thirteen years in calm and certain expectation of the 
destined crown. 

On Thursday, August 28, 1628, there suffered at Lancaster the 
glorious martyr, Father Edmund Arrowsmith, a priest of the Society of 
Jesus. And that very night he appeared in glory at the bedside of the 
monk who was to follow in his steps. When Father Barlow lay under 
sentence of death in Lancaster Castle, he wrote to Dom Rudesind : " 1 
believe I shall suffer, for Mr. Bradshaw" (this was one of the names 
used by Father Arrowsmith for concealment), " the last that suffered 
martyrdom, the night after he suffered, whereas I knew nothing of his. 
death, spoke thus to me, standing by my bedside : ' I have suffered, and 
now you will be to suffer ; say little, for they will endeavour to take 
hold of your words.' ' 

And so our martyr lived in the daily expectation of the martyr's 
crown. When his biographer visited him for the last time, at Easter, 
1639, two years before he was apprehended, he told him plainly, as he 
had often done before, " that they would not leave till they had him to 
Lancaster." His friend was astonished at these words, as all seemed 
quiet at the time, " and there were great hopes of better and better, and 
no danger that the heretics could prevail to have him imprisoned." But 
the martyr knew well what was coming ; and then going on to speak of 
the conversion of England, he expressed what was a constant thought 
with him, in the following words, " Indeed, it must be by the sword." 

By this he meant, we suppose, that the blood of many martyrs must 
be shed, before the sin of our country should be atoned and God restore 
her to His favour. 

229 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

He then went on to tell his friend of Father Arrowsmith and his 
prediction, and of his warning to have a care of his words when he came 
before the judges. "To which, I answering in these words, 'I am 
sure, Sir, that you will talke to them ' (my meaning was that he would 
speake boldly to the honour of God and confusion of heresy), at my 
blunt reply he did laugh heartily : and now our merrie martyr is merrie 
indeed, and his joy shall never have an end." 

So anxious was he for the promised crown that it would seem that 
this was the reason why he refused to leave the county of Lancashire, 
where it had been revealed to him that he was to glorify God by his 
death. Thus his biographer tells us the following story : 

" Once a friend of mine, who lived in Cheshire, desired me to procure 
a priest to come into his house, but he must be such an one as was of 
exemplar life. Whereupon I propounded our martyr, and describing 
his life and conversation he liked well thereof. I went then and 
delivered my petition with no diffidence at all of being denied : but 
after some hours were past, he answered me first in these words : ' In 
good deed Lancaster is my prison,' which now I understand ; and he 
likewise said that priests ' did alwaies much goode in Lancaster Castle, 
but in Chester jayle he never heard of any good that they did.' I 
thought it strange (and so I was bold to tell him), that he talk't of 
prisons, the times being then so quiet. In conclusion, he wish'd me to 
procure some other and excuse him, for he must not goe out of 
Lancaster ; and he hath bin as good as his word." 

Nor did he take the least trouble to conceal himselr. 

" When he travelled abroad he went the ordinary way, and even 
through the towne of Leigh when his businesse was that way, and I 
thinke he was as well knowne to many there as their Parson. Some 
talke much of discretion, but his fortitude hath sure brought out good 
fruit. Upon a time, speaking of some of the gentrie that would not be 
scene by any at Masse, he said, ' I like not those that will be peeping at 
God.' And indeed two of these peepers have give no good example 
of late." 

Here is a delightful picture of the simple, homely life our martyr led, 
mingled as it was with so many perils : 

" At Christmasse will be five, six, or seven yeares, I cannot tell which, 
I being then at Morleys with him, there came upon the eve (as 
usually there did at that good time), very many Catholickes far and 
neare to watch and pray. Among the rest there came a young man 
from behind Manchester, where, in his passage, he understood, as he 
told us, that there was a pursevant (and his name was Cartwright as 
I remember), who had commission to have taken Mr. Barlow, and for 
230 




THE VENERABLE AMBROSE BARLOW, O.S.B. 



To face page 230 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

that purpose intended to have beene here upon Christmasse day in 
the morning, as he had told to some in the towne ; ' but he hath (quoth 
he) fallen downe the staires at Holiwels the innkeeper but yesterday, 
and broken his necke.' And so our martyr's day being not yet come, 
wee had the happinesse to heare his three Masses and his sermon ; and 
the poore folkes having every one of them received the feast of feasts at 
our martyr's hands, had his feast at last, and did praise Our Lord. But I 
must returne againe to speake of the fervour of his pcenitents. The 
foulest winter weather was no hindrance to them ; old folkes as well as 
young came, and those that could not well come by day came by night. 

"Being come, they hasted to the chappell, where the men having 
their hats upon a round table altogether (representing the unity of their 
hearts), they past by a faire cole fire to the altar which upon the eve was 
ready drest with cleane linnens ; and a venerable old vestment laid 
thereon, which came out but upon great daies, with all other things 
poore and cleane. The old picture before the altar was the araignment 
of Our Blessed Saviour. Against that good time, he used to prepare 
great wax candles, which he did helpe to make himselfe. I have still 
had a great desire to express how much I was edified in that place by 
the Pastour and his pcenitents, who seemed to me to represent the 
good Catholickes in the primitive Church. They so truly united in 
Charity, rejoyced coming (from severall places) to meet one another in 
that holy exercise ; they spent the night modestly and devoutly, some- 
times in prayer before the altar, other whiles singing devout songs by 
the fireside in another roome where they had another fire, that their 
singing might not disturbe those that would be praying in the 
chappell. . . . 

" Upon all great Holidays and most Sundays (as I thinke) he used 
to preache, and (as I conjecture) in every place that he lodged at in his 
circuit. Surely he had a singular talent therein, and could performe it 
with great facility without penning it. His stile phrase in preaching as 
it seemed to me was the likest unto the Scripture phrase of any that ever 
I heard, briefe, plaine, and pithy ; using therein also many pretty parables, 
in citing of the Holy Scriptures very ready. Oft have I called to mind, 
how (upon the first Good Friday I heard him preach) so movingly he 
did mention unto us the Passion of Our Saviour, and those words of 
St. Paul, which I had not taken notice of before, he made me ever 
to remember, and highly to reverence, viz. Jesum Christum pr<edicamus 
Jud<eis scandalum, gentibus autem SMltitiam. (" But we preach Christ crucified, 
unto the Jews indeed a stumbling-block, and unto the Gentiles foolish- 
ness." i Cor. i. 23.) 

But his example was more potent than any preaching. " When he 

231 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

talkt with women I observed that he was either sitting and then he look't 
another way, or he walk'd casting his head downwards." He never forgot 
he was a monk, and so either he stayed at home where he was not 
troubled with the company of women, or when he was forced to go 
among them for charity's sake, he went but as a passing traveller, and 
never stayed longer than was necessary. 

" Upon a time, I came with my mother to Morleys to spend a good 
time with him in devotion. But it so fell out that I was called away 
upon some businesse, and so for some weekes absent. In the interim 
at Masse and meate, our martyr and my mother did meet, but no 
oftner. When I returned he told me what a solitary time my mother 
had had on it, and I thinke it was the solitariest that ever she had in 
her life. He wished me to excuse it if need were, but she was much 
edified with it." 

And yet, with all his love of solitude, our martyr's hospitality was 
truly Benedictine. 

" Our martyr's man alwaies sat at meat with him, unlesse there were 
better guests than myselfe. Our ordinarie was three pence, our martyr 
paying for priests and poore folkes, and on all in the winter that lodged 
he bestowed a good cole-fire in their chamber. His house was the onely 
sure refuge that I knew for poore folkes and poenitents. For other 
folkes use to stand upon their nice termes, which he did not. 

" His solemne dales of invitation were three, viz. : Christ-masse, 
Easter, and Whitsunday ; and then he entertained all that would dine with 
him. Their cheare was boil'd beefe and pottage, minched pies, goose and 
groates, and to every man a gray coate at parting. He served them, and 
his example made some others of his richer guests to doe the like. In 
fine when the poore were risen, he sat downe at their table, and made 
his dinner of their leavings : and then the residue that was left was divided 
among the poorest to take home with them." 

We have some precious details of his personal appearance and 
dress. 

" Remembering how Sir Thomas More jested at his beard, it put 
me in mind that our martyr was ever careless of his ; for he did not 
trouble him selfe nor other with the trimming or shaving of it, but let 
it alone as nature had framed it.. It was forked and not long, much 
haire about his cheekes. The haire of his head curled naturally, which 
sure was sometimes cut, for it was never long." Hair, of a chestnut 
colour, was still adhering to the skull when found at Wardley Hall. 

" His cloathes were still ofgray-frise, the fashion thereof for the oldness 
might be the same, that was in use when he first did leave or return into 
England ; a long-waisted jerkin and doublet, his breeches tied above 
232 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

knees. The best hatt that ever I saw him weare, I would not have given 
two groates for ; the band about his neck of the country folkes fashion, 
as poore a one as is ordinarily worne by any, tied with a round threaden 
point, as I remember : no cuffes at all. Instead of pantofles, a pair of 
scurvy old slip-shoes, which continually he wore within doores. I ad- 
venturing once to find fault with those slip-shoes said unto him : 'Alas, 
Sir, why doe you not get a paire of warme slippers ? besides, you goe 
uneasily in those trashes.' His answer was, ' We must have somewhat 
to looke at.' Although it be a common thing amongst many good men 
that would be loath to fight, to weare swords, yet our martyr would wear 
none ; and thus merrily he answered me when I tooke notice thereof, 
saying, ' Indeed, I dare not weare a sword, because I am of a chollericke 
nature.' And then he told me in these words, that he had like once to 
have gone together by the eares with one that would have taken him, 
but in the end his heeles proved his best weapon. 

" He loved to observe how time passed, but he had no pocket 
watch : and once I asked him why he had not a watch to take abroad 
with, as it was usuall : and he answered me that it was pride, pride. 
He had a clocke at home for that purpose, which nobody kept but 
himselfe." 

One more personal detail, and we have finished with this precious 
document. 

" He desired me very earnestly once to teach him to make pictures, 
at which I confesse I did then much wonder ; but now I am much 
comforted therewith. Indeed I thought it was unlikely that he should 
reape any profit to himselfe or others by it, and that he knew how to 
make better use of his time in some other thing : yet he had a further 
project which was, that in teaching of him, I would make a picture for 
his altar : which I did, and it was of Our Saviour crowned with thorns. 
All things considered, I did much wonder that it was performed so 
well. But in the meane time my goode scholler made three for one 
with me, which I thought then would have beene in no esteeme, because 
they were no better than the letters that young scribes use to make at 
first : but verily even then his poore ghostly children beg'd them, and 
(as he told me) were very glad of them. After this he fell seriously to 
his worke, and made many more : which I believe will be now in more 
esteem than artificiall [i.e. artistic] pictures, and will remaine as deare 
memorialls of Christ's martyr." 

It is quite possible that the picture of our martyr, engraved on 
vellum, and now in the possession of Mr. Gillow, may be taken from a 
portrait painted by this worthy man. A copy of it is reproduced in these 
pages. 

2 o 233 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

It bears the inscription : 

Vera Effigies Rdi. P. Ambrosii Barlow, presbyteri, et monachi congregation!! 
Anglicans, ordinis Sti Benedicti, qui pro Christi fide sanguinem fudit 
Lancas tri<e in Ang Ha, 10 Septembris, 1641, atatis su<e 56. 

(The true likeness of the Reverend Father Ambrose Barlow, of the 
English Congregation of the Order of St. Benedict, who for the faith of 
Christ shed his blood at Lancaster in England, loth September, 1641, 
aged 56.) 



THE LAST YEARS 

BEFORE describing the martyr's arrest, we may add some further 
particulars of his holy life, gathered by Bishop Challoner from the 
Knaresborough MSS.* and from other authentic sources. 

" Such was the fervour of his zeal that he thought the day lost in 
which he had not done some notable thing for the salvation of souls. 
Night and day, he was ever ready to lay hold of all occasions of reclaiming 
any one from error ; and whatever time he could spare from his devotions, 
he employed in seeking after the lost sheep, and in preaching the Word 
of God. But then he never neglected the care of his own sanctification : 
he celebrated Mass, and recited the office with great reverence and 
devotion, had his fixed hours for mental prayer, which he never omitted, 
and found so much pleasure in this inward conversation with God (from 
which he received that constant supply of heavenly light and strength), 
that when the time came on which he had devoted to this holy exercise, 
he was affected with a sensible joy, as much as worldlings would be when 
going to a feast. He had also a great devotion to the Rosary, which he 
daily recited and recommended much to his penitents ; and was very 
tenderly affected with the sacred mysteries of the Incarnation, Passion, 
and Resurrection of the Son of God (which he there contemplated), and 
was much devoted to His Blessed Mother. He often meditated on the 
sufferings of his Redeemer with his arms extended in the form of a 
cross, and these meditations enkindled in his soul a desire of suffering for 
Christ, a happiness for which he daily prayed. 

He had a great contempt of the world and its vanities, and a very 
humble opinion of himself, joined with a great esteem, love and 
veneration for the virtue of others. He was always afraid of honours 
and preferments, and had a horror of vain glory, which he used to call 
* the worm or moth of virtues,' and never failed to correct in others, 

* Now in the possession of the Lady Herries. 
234 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

sometimes in a jocose way, at others seriously, according to the temper 
of the persons. He industriously avoided feasts and assemblies and all 
meetings for merry-making, as liable to dangers of excess, idle talk and 
detraction. . . . He always abstained from wine, and being asked the reason 
why he did so, he alleged the saying of the wise man, Wine and women 
make the wise apostatize. . . . He was sometimes applied to exorcize 
persons possessed by the devil, which he did with good success. He 
had a great talent in composing of differences, and reconciling such as 
were at variance ; and was consulted as an oracle by the Catholics of 
that country in all their doubts and difficulties. 

" Yet he was very severe in rebuking sin, so that obstinate and 
impenitent sinners were afraid of coming near him. Nothing more 
sensibly afflicted him than when he saw any one going astray from the 
right path of virtue and truth, more especially if it were a person of 
whom he had conceived a good opinion or had great hopes ; upon these 
occasions he would at first be almost oppressed with melancholy, till, 
recollecting himself in God, and submitting to His wise Providence, 
(justly permitting evil to draw greater good out of it), he recovered again 
his usual peace and serenity." 

We can imagine how he wept over the terrible fate of an unhappy 
apostate in the town of Leigh, who perished some two years before his 
own death. This man had not only fallen from the faith, but had become 
" a notorious sport-master to the Protestants," greatly scandalising the 
faithful by his blasphemous parody of the ceremonies and gestures used 
in celebrating Holy Mass. Whether he was doing this at the time is 
not clear, but, in any case, as he was standing in the tower of the Pro- 
testant Church at Leigh, a rope suddenly broke, and the clock-weights 
fell upon his head, killing him on the spot. The Catholics of Leigh 
who came to Mass on Easter Day, 1639, told this to our martyr with 
great awe, as a manifest judgment of God. 

Some months before his last arrest, he was again afflicted by hearing 
that some persons whom he loved as his own soul, had resolved to do 
something very wicked, which was likely to lead to the ruin of many 
souls. He was so affected by this sudden and unlooked-for blow that 
it brought on a stroke of paralysis, which took away the use of one side, 
and put him in great danger. What added very much to this cross was 
the fear that his poor children would thereby be deprived of spiritual 
consolations. He suffered so much that he was brought to death's door, 
and to add to his affliction, no priest could be found to administer to him 
the last Sacraments. In this extremity he was comforted by God 
Himself, for after falling into a sort of ecstasy, he was heard to break 
forth into words like these, " Lord, Thy will be done ! A due con- 

235 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

formity of our will to Thine, is to be preferred to the use of the 
Sacraments, and even to martyrdom itself. I reverence and earnestly 
desire Thy Sacraments, and I have often wished to lay down my life 
for Thee in the profession of my faith ; but if it be pleasing to Thine 
infinite wisdom by this illness to take me out of the prison of this body, 
half dead already, Thy will be done ! " 

Thus he was willing to resign, if God so pleased, even that very 
crown for which he so ardently sighed. To reward such dispositions, 
God was pleased to send to him a priest of the Society of Jesus, who 
administered to him the consolations of our holy religion. According to 
Challoner, he was thus rewarded for having himself twelve years before 
administered the last Sacraments to the illustrious Jesuit martyr, Father 
Edmund Arrowsmith, as he lay in prison awaiting his last conflict. 
Though the biographers of Father Arrowsmith do not mention this 
incident, Challoner's authorities are so good that we may well accept it 
as a fact. Perhaps this is the reason why this holy Jesuit appeared, 
after his martyrdom, to our Benedictine, as already related. 

Before proceeding to recount the last act of the tragedy, it may be well 
to give a glance at the political aspect of affairs in England at this 
troublous time, as this will greatly help us to understand the story. 
Father Barlow's missionary life lasted, as we know, from 1617 to 1641. 
These years witnessed the growing power of the House of Commons, 
and of the Puritan sect, till the movement culminated, during the later 
years of Charles I., in open rebellion and civil war. 

Charles I. came to the throne in 1625. He was naturally averse to 
persecution, and being married to a Catholic wife, did his best (in the 
feeble sort of way that was characteristic of him) to protect the most 
faithful and devoted of his subjects from the utmost rigours of the 
penal laws. But the Parliament was ever urging upon him to execute 
the laws against them, and the unhappy prince gave way again and again 
to their insolent demands. 

However, Father Arrowsmith was the only priest to suffer under 
Charles I., till the summoning of the Long Parliament in November 
1640, and the impeachment of Lord Strafford on a charge of high treason, 
brought the struggle for supremacy between King and Commons to the 
point of open rupture. The execution of Strafford, May 12, 1641, was 
the virtual proclamation of civil war, and henceforward the Parliament 
became ever increasingly powerful. Hating Catholics with a double 
hatred both for their loyalty to the Pope and their fidelity to the King, 
they vowed a relentless war against the " Popish Malignants." The 
Venerable John Goodman had been thrown as a victim to the malice of 
the "Short Parliament," but his own generous plea that he might be 
236 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

sacrificed rather than live to be the subject of discontent between the 
King and his people, softened even Puritan hearts, and he was permitted 
to die in prison. But the Long Parliament thirsted still more for blood ; 
and the Venerable William Ward, who was martyred at Tyburn on St. 
Anne's day, two months after the execution of Strafford, was its first 
priestly victim. Our martyr was to be the second. 

"The political manoeuvres," writes Charles Butler,* "which persuaded 
the multitude to believe that the sovereign was a favourer of popery, 
and which left him, as he too readily supposed, no means of repelling 
the charge, except that of causing the laws against them to be executed 
with due vigour, may be dated from the beginning of the reign of 
James 1. Frequent resort to this unjustifiable but effective measure was 
had, during the contests between Charles I. and his Parliament : the 
religion of the Queen was too often used as a pretext to give the insinua- 
tion credit and currency. Stories the most absurd and ridiculous were, 
at the same time, propagated, to inflame the multitude against the 
Catholics by rendering them objects both of hatred and alarm." 

Thus, at this time, the celebrated Hampden actually introduced to 
the House of Commons a tailor of Cripplegate, who pretended that he 
had overheard the details of a plot to assassinate one hundred and eight 
leading members of Parliament at the rate of 10 for every lord and 
4OJ. for every commoner so murdered ! 

This preposterous story lashed the House into a frenzy : the train- 
bands and militia of the kingdom were ordered out, and the tailor's 
report was printed and circulated throughout the kingdom. 

Proclamation after proclamation was issued against the unhappy 
Catholics. On March 7 a royal decree ordered that all priests should 
leave the kingdom within the space of a calendar month. Those who 
did not obey were to suffer the penalties prescribed for traitors. When 
this proclamation appeared, Father Barlow's friends besought him, at 
least, to conceal himself. But he steadily refused. "Let them fear 
that have anything to lose which they are unwilling to part with," he 
said. For himself, he most earnestly desired to lose his life in so good 
a cause. He was beginning to recover from his illness, and his hopes of 
martyrdom had revived. Nor was he to be disappointed. 

* Memorial! of English Catholics, vol. ii. p. 397. 



237 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 



LANCASTER CASTLE 

EASTER-DAY, that year, fell on April 25, so that it was already more 
than a fortnight after the date fixed by the royal proclamation. 

On this the queen of all Christian feasts, the Protestants of Leigh 
were gathered together in their old parish church, to take part in the 
Anglican service and listen to the exhortations of their Vicar. Mean- 
while the faithful were gathered round their beloved priest at Morleys 
Hall, to assist at the adorable sacrifice of the Mass. The Lamb of God 
whose Pasch they were celebrating was offered up by the trembling 
hands of the half-paralysed priest, who was so soon to offer his own 
blood in union with that of his Lord and Redeemer. Well he knew 
that since the time of grace had expired, the hour of his sacrifice was 
close at hand. Yet even he can hardly have anticipated such an inter- 
ruption of the Paschal solemnities as was destined to take place. 
For at Leigh Parish Church a strange scene was being enacted.* 
The Reverend James Gatley, the Vicar, was a man of zeal for the 
Anglican religion, and it seemed to him that he could not celebrate so 
great a feast more worthily than by striking a blow against the hated 
Catholics. There was a numerous congregation gathered round him, 
and he was so fired with the idea, that he proposed to them to omit the 
usual service, and to proceed in a body to Morleys Hall, where they 
would be sure to find the Papists assembled at their idolatrous Mass, 
and could help him to apprehend Barlow, that noted Popish priest, in 
the very act ; and thus they would perform a work more worthy of their 
zeal for the Gospel, than if they were to have their sermon and prayers, 
and risk the chance of missing the priest by delaying till after the service. 
No sooner said than done. The proposal was accepted with enthusiasm, 
and the whole congregation, about four hundred in number, armed with 
clubs and swords, followed the parson, who marched in front in his surplice, 
to Morleys Hall, where our martyr, having finished his Mass, was making 
an exhortation to his people on the subject of patience. There were 
about one hundred gathered together before the humble altar, with 
its picture of the arraignment of Our Blessed Saviour. We can imagine 
their panic, as the shouts of the rabble outside were heard, drowning the 
priest's voice. The minister began to thunder at the house doors, a-nd 
the faithful within crowded round their beloved Father, urging him to 
take shelter in one of the hiding-holes in the house. But, like St. Thomas 

* It has frequently been stated, in error, that this happened at Eccles. Morleys 
is in the parish of Leigh, and this church is much nearer to the Hall than that of 
Eccles. 

238 




HANDFORTH HALL 

Photo by James Watts 



To face page 238 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

of Canterbury, he refused to save himself and leave his sheep to the 
mercy of these wolves, and, after briefly exhorting them to constancy, 
he ordered the doors to be opened. 

The mob immediately rushed in, crying out, " Where is Barlow ? 
Where is Barlow ? He is the man we want ! " Even now he might 
have escaped in the crowd, but no such thought crossed his mind. 
Calmly and patiently he gave himself up into their hands, feeling that 
at last his hour was come. 

The faithful were permitted to leave unmolested, after their names 
had been taken, and they had given caution for their appearance before 
the justices. In the meantime the mob searched the whole house, broke 
open the martyr's chest, and rummaged and turned over his clothes ; but 
by God's providence did not discover a considerable sum of money 
which had lately been given him for the poor. Father Barlow was 
full of gratitude for this, and was able, later on, to give directions 
for the disposal of the money according to the directions of the 
donors. 

The martyr was now carried off by the minister and his mob (who, 
it seems, had acted in this whole affair without any warrant), and brought 
before a Justice of the Peace named Risley, probably (says Mr. Gillow), 
a member of the family seated at Risley Hall in the parish of Winwick. 
He sent him, guarded by sixty armed men, to Lancaster Castle. Some 
of his flock would have attempted to rescue him on the road, had not 
the martyr earnestly entreated them not to think of it. 

He was carried to prison in. a sort of triumph by his armed mob, 
who treated him with every species of insult and contempt, though he 
was still so weak that he could not sit on horseback without one 
behind to support him. But all this he bore joyously for the love 
of Christ. 

The old towers of Lancaster Castle still frown upon the town at 
their feet, as they did in our martyr's day. As he entered the great 
gateway he must have thought of Father Arrowsmith, whose quartered 
limbs had been exposed on the summit of John of Gaunt's Tower but 
a few years before. To those who came to him in prison he loved to 
speak of his Jesuit forerunner, and of the vision which assured him that 
he too would win his palm. 

A priest of his own Order, who had interest at Court, wrote to him 
to ask what he desired to be done for him. Would he prefer to be 
sent into banishment, or to be removed to London ? He replied that 
he desired neither, but that he wished him not to concern himself 
about him, since to die for this cause was to him far more desirable 
than life. 

2 39 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

In prison he found much comfort in the book of Boetius, De Con- 
sotatione, till the jailor, noticing this, had the barbarity to take it away 
from him. But the martyr only said with a smile, " If you take this 
little book away, I will betake myself to that great book from which 
Boetius learned his wholesome doctrine, and that book you can never 
take away from me " : and by this he meant mental prayer, which indeed 
he continually practised. When any one came to visit him in prison, he 
would not suffer the time to be lost in vain or worldly talk, but spoke 
only of spiritual things. 

After more than four months' imprisonment the trial came on 
September 7, before Sir Robert Heath. Information of his capture had 
been despatched to the Council, and on Friday, May 20, 1641, the 
following resolution had been passed by the Lords : 

" Whereas this House was informed that a Romish priest was appre- 
hended on Easter-day last past at the Hall of Morleys, in the County 
of Lancaster, called by the name of Edward Barlowe, who upon his 
examination confessed himself a Romish priest, and has received orders 
at Arras ; he being now committed to the common gaol of Lancaster, it 
is ordered that the said Edward Barlowe shall be proceeded against at 
the next Assizes for the said county, according to law." 

The Judge had received instructions from the Puritan Parliament to 
see that the extreme penalty of the law was executed upon any priest 
convicted at Lancaster, " for a terror to the Catholics who were numerous 
in that county." 

The indictment being read, Father Barlow freely acknowledged him- 
self a priest, and that he had exercised his priestly functions for above 
twenty years in the kingdom. This, of course, sealed his fate. 

Asked why he had not obeyed the royal proclamation and departed 
the realm before April 7 last, he pleaded first that the edict only 
specified "Jesuits and Seminary priests," whereas he was a Religious of 
the Order of St. Benedict ; and secondly, that as was well known to those 
who had brought him to prison, he had been so weakened by his recent 
severe illness, that it was quite impossible for him to have undertaken 
the journey at that time. 

The Judge, perceiving that the people were moved with compassion 
towards him, and that every one -said that his sickness was a legitimate 
excuse for him, turned the subject, and asked him what he thought of 
the justice of those laws by which those of his profession were put to 
death. 

" 1 esteem them unjust and barbarous," replied the martyr. " For 
what law," he continued, "can be more unjust than this, by which priests 
are condemned to suffer as traitors, merely because they are Roman, that 
240 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

is, true priests ? For there are no other true priests [in England] but 
the Roman ; and if these be destroyed, what must become of the divine 
law, when none remain to preach God's word and administer His 
Sacraments ? " 

" If such be your opinion," retorted the Judge, " what do you think 
of our kings who have made these laws ? " 

Perceiving the malice of this question, the martyr only said that he 
prayed God to pardon the authors of such laws, and those who carried 
them into execution. 

The Judge then told him that his sickness excused him in some 
measure, and that he would set him at liberty, provided he promised not 
to seduce the people any more. " It will be easy," said the servant of 
God, " to pledge my word to this, since I am no seducer but a reducer 
of the people to the true and ancient religion. I have laboured all 
along to disabuse the minds of those who have fallen into error, and I 
am in the resolution to continue until death to render this good office to 
these strayed souls." 

The Judge, as he afterwards acknowledged, was astonished at the 
constancy of his answers and his courage, and said to him : " You speak 
very boldly to a man who is master of your life, and who can either 
acquit or condemn you as he shall judge proper." 

" It is true," replied the martyr, " that you have power given to you 
over me through a wicked policy, but be aware, although I appear before 
you in quality of a criminal, being, as I am, a minister of Jesus Christ 
and a priest of the New Law, in spiritual matters, I am judge, and I 
declare to you that if you continue to condemn the innocent, and remain 
in the darkness of heresy, you will have no part in the happiness of the 
children of God." 

"1 shall have the advantage of you," concluded the Judge in anger, 
" since my sentence will be executed first." * 

Upon this the Judge directed the jury to bring him in guilty, and 
the next day, the Feast of the Nativity of Our Blessed Lady, he 
pronounced sentence upon him in the usual form. 

He seems sincerely to have regretted the martyr's fate, but pleaded 
that his hands were tied by the express orders of the Parliament, and 
that once the prisoner had confessed his priesthood, he could do nothing 
to save him. 

Father Barlow heard with great serenity and cheerfulness the dreadful 
sentence pronounced, exclaiming, " Thanks be to God." He then 
prayed with all his heart that the Divine Majesty would pardon all 
who had in any way been accessory to his death. 

* Allanson MSS. (Ampleforth Abbey) Biography, i. pp. 82-85. 
2 H 241 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The Judge applauded his charity, and granted him what he petitioned 
for : that is, a chamber to himself in the Castle, where for the short 
remainder of his time he might without molestation apply himself to his 
devotions, and prepare for his end. 

Meanwhile, his religious brethren were met together in General 
Chapter. Dom Rudesind Barlow resigned the Cathedral Priorship of 
Coventry,* and his brother, Dom Ambrose, was elected in his place on 
September 3. But before this information could reach him, he had 
passed into eternity. Yet it was a last testimony on the part of his 
brethren to the affection and reverence in which they held this great 
servant of God, who was fighting his Lord's battles in England. 



THE MARTYR'S CROWN 

FATHER BARLOW had the happiness of shedding his blood for his Lord on 
a Friday. It was only two days after his condemnation that he was led 
out to die i.e. September 10, 1641. 

The hurdle was ready at the foot of John of Gaunt's Tower, and the 
martyr was laid on it. We do not know if he was permitted to wear the 
Benedictine habit on this his day of triumph. When a monk is professed, 
he lies prostrate beneath a funeral pall to typify his death to the world, 
till at the Communion of the Mass the deacon comes to him and sings : 
" Awake, thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead ; and Christ shall 
give thee light." He then arises and goes to the altar to receive Holy 
Communion. 

Our martyr's thoughts must have gone back to that day, five and 
twenty years before, when in the prime of his manhood he made his 
holocaust to God. Now he was about to consummate the sacrifice, for he 
had been, like his great Exemplar, " obedient unto death." 

As he was drawn on the hurdle from the Castle gateway to the place of 
execution hard by, he held in his hand a little cross of wood which he had 
made. When he was come to the place, he was loosed from the hurdle, 
and went three times round the gallows, reciting the Miserere. Some of 
the ministers were for disputing with him about religion, but he told them 
that it was an unfair and unseasonable challenge, and that he had some- 
thing else to do than to hearken to their fooleries. Surely, he had 

* By the Bull of Urban VIII., Plantata in agro Dominica, the restored English Congre- 
gation of the Order received the rights and privileges of their predecessors, and among 
them the right to the nine cathedrals which had belonged to the Benedictines in times 
gone by. Priors were appointed to these Cathedral Monasteries, and these titular dignities 
survive to our own day. 
242 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

suffered enough already from the zeal of parsons ! As to this, Mr. 
Fletcher Moss quaintly says, " Some ' ministers of religion ' persisted in 
trying to ' convert him.' Perhaps they thought they were kind and good. 
An old Lancashire proverb says, ' There's nowt so queer as folk.' ' 

He suffered with great constancy. According to the sentence, he 
was hanged, dismembered, disembowelled, quartered, and boiled in tar ; 
but, as another martyr said, as he listened to the dreadful details at his 
condemnation, " All this is but one death." And as he had said himself, 
when they tried to persuade him to petition for mercy, he "must die some 
time or other, and could not die a better death." 

There is something extremely touching in the contrast between the 
tragedy of such a death, and the sweet, homely details of the good monk's 
life. But he died as simply as he lived, without ostentation or parade, 
rejoicing "to be dissolved and to be with Christ." 

"There is a tradition among the Catholics of Lancashire," saysDodd, 
who derived his information from Edward Barlow, alias Booth, the 
martyr's godson, " that Mr. Barlow, before he suffered, foretold that he 
was to be the last that should die at Lancaster upon account of Holy 
Orders, which has hitherto been verified. For though several priests 
have been condemned since at Lancaster, none have suffered, excepting 
Mr. Smith, alias Harrison, who was maliciously indicted and taken off 
upon another account." 

When the news reached Douay, Dom Clement Reyner, the 
President-General, sent round a circular " Mortuary Bill " to the 
brethren in the various monasteries, of which a copy is still preserved. 
It begins Te Deum Laudamus, and is, of course, in Latin. We append 
a translation : 

Te Deum Laudamus. 

" At Lancaster in England, after a holy life, daily labours endured in 
cultivating the vineyard of Christ for four and twenty years, and an 
abundant harvest of souls offered to God, our Reverend Father in Christ, 
(by us to be honoured with all reverence), 

" FATHER AMBROSE BARLOW 

suffered a glorious martyrdom, for the defence of the faith of the Holy 
Catholic and Roman Church, the Mother of all who have God for their 
Father. He was a priest and monk of the English Congregation of the 
Order of St. Benedict, professed in the Monastery of St. Gregory at 
Douay, and was in the 55th year of his age, the 25th of his 
profession, and the 24th of his priesthood. We desire, therefore, 
that this should be made known to all, especially to the monks of 
our English Congregation, and to others of the same Order, that the 

243 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Masses and other prayers which they are bound to recite for their 
departed Brethren should be changed into Masses of the Most Holy 
Trinity, the Hymn Te Deum Laudamus, and into other acts of thanksgiving, 
for to pray for a Martyr would be to offer wrong to Jesus Christ, the 
King of Martyrs. But let these and all other the faithful of Christ 
praise God together with us, and pray that this Benedictine tree of the 
English Congregation should so ever grow in virtues that it may merit 
frequently to offer to God fruit of this kind. And oh ! would that he, 
who with immense joy of heart signs this letter, might be the next ! By 
God's mercy, a fuller account of the life and death of the aforesaid 
Martyr shall follow on this notice. 

" (Signed) Fr. CLEMENT REYNER, 

" Unworthy President-General of the English Congregation of 
the Order of St. Benedict." 

It would seem that a large portion of the holy relics of our martyr 
came into Catholic hands. 

His head, as we have seen, was rescued by Francis Downes of 
Wardley Hall, and is still preserved in that historic house, which is about 
five miles distant from Morleys Hall. 

At Stanbrook Abbey, near Worcester, the Benedictine nuns religiously 
preserve the martyr's left hand, which was formerly kept at the Mission 
of Knaresborough, in Yorkshire. The appearance of the hand, as regards 
colour and texture, is much like old parchment. The furrows of the 
skin are very conspicuous, the thumb and index-finger are pressed 
together, the little finger rests against the ring finger, but its point is 
drawn inwards across the inner side of the latter ; the middle finger stands 
apart from the others. The nails are almond shape, the " free edge" is 
broken and uneven. The points of the fingers are shrunken and 
contracted. We give an illustration of this precious relic. The nuns 
have also a portion of one of the fingers of the right hand, and a small 
piece of bone. 

At St. Gregory's Abbey, Downside, the martyr's own Monastery, 
there is a piece of a rib about four inches long. At the Franciscan 
Convent, Taunton, is a bone about two inches long. Lastly, at our 
Abbey of St. Thomas the Martyr, at Erdington, are preserved two relics. 
One is a bone about two inches long, one of the metacarpal bones. 

It bears the inscription in seventeenth-century handwriting : 

" Beatl Ambnsli Barlow sacerdotis et Martyris ex ordine Set Benedicti In Anglla." 

This relic was preserved in St. Mary's Convent, York, for many many 
years, but was given to the writer in 1899. The other Erdington 
244 




THE HAND OF YEN. AMBROSE BARLOW, 
O.S.B., AT ST. MARY'S ABBEY, STANBROOK 

To face f age 244 



THE SKULL OF WARDLEY HALL 

relic is a piece of one of our martyr's ribs. This was in the possession ot 
the late Miss Blundell of Little Crosby, in Lancashire, and was kept with 
other relics in a silver reliquary, which has in the front a crucifix incised, 
and on the back the inscription 

" MRA A relique of B. Fr. Sutton." 

The reliquary, with the other relics, is now at Taunton, but the relic of 
Father Barlow, which is about one and a half inches long by three-quarters 
of an inch wide, is at Erdington Abbey. It still has some skin adhering 
to it. On the paper that enfolded it is written in a contemporary hand, 
" Mr. Barlow's Rib." 

The small portrait of Father Barlow, which we have reproduced, was 
engraved immediately after the martyrdom. A copy printed on vellum, 
in possession of Richard Morse Carr, Esquire, has attached to it a piece 
of the martyr's bone. 

Let us now return to the martyr's family and its fate. On Sunday, 
May 26, 1644, that is, in less than three years from the tragedy at Lan- 
caster, Prince Rupert and his army encamped on Barlow Moor on their 
rush to succour Bolton and Lathom House, and it is most likely, says 
Mr. Moss, that the Prince and his officers would rest in Barlow Hall, for 
the Barlows were loyal to the King, though he had let their brother die. 
In 1620 all the family had been inscribed as Popish Recusants, but it was 
among these that the King in his need found his most faithful friends. 

In the next century, when Prince Charlie came to Manchester in the 
famous '45, Lord Elcho and his cavalry went south by the Barlow Ford, 
close to Barlow Hall. The main army built, and crossed by, the first 
bridge over the Mersey, between Didsbury and Cheadle. 

The troubles and persecutions of the family thickened through their 
devotion to the Stuart cause. In 1734 there is mention of a dispute 
about " the consecrated goods or ornaments in the Popish Chapel at 
Barlow." 

Our martyr's eldest brother, Sir Alexander Barlow of Barlow, died in 
1642, the year after the martyrdom, and was buried in the Collegiate 
Church of Manchester, by the side of his father, on July 6. 

Dom Rudesind died at Douay, September 19, 1656, aged seventy- 
two. He had been President-General of his Congregation, Prior of his 
Monastery, and was for forty years Professor of Theology in the College 
of St. Vedast. He was a profound scholar, and one of the foremost 
Canonists of his age. 

Sir Alexander was succeeded by his son Alexander, the fourth in 
succession of the name recorded in the pedigree of the family. He died 
without issue in 1654, and was succeeded by his half-brother Thomas, 

245 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

who died in 1684, and was succeeded by his son Anthony. The name of 
Anthony Barlow appears in the list of Papists who, in conformity with the 
Act i George I., registered their estates with the respective values thereof. 
The yearly value of the Barlow Hall estate is returned at 171 95. He 
died in 1723, and the estate descended to his eldest son, Thomas, who 
died of gaol-fever in Lancaster Castle in 1729. He was succeeded by 
his eldest son, Thomas, the last male heir of the family, who died in 
March 1773, at the age of fifty-four, without issue, and was buried in 
the Collegiate Church, Manchester. In him a lineage of over seven 
hundred years ended. 

The arms of the Barlows of Barlow were sable, a double eagle displayed 
argent, membered or, standing on a limb of a tree raguled and trunked of 
the second. 

The estate was sold by auction, according to Act of Parliament, in 
1785, and was purchased by Samuel Egerton of Tatton. 

"There are to-day," writes Mr. Moss, " men of the name and lineage 
of Barlow of Barlow toiling as day labourers on the land which bears 
their name, and of which their fathers once were lords." 

Earthly honours and wealth pass away, indeed, but the glories of 
the aristocracy of heaven only increase with the centuries. Ambrose 
Barlow is now numbered among the Venerable Servants of God ; 
soon, we hope, he will be raised to our altars as one of the beatified 
martyrs of England. Some day he will, doubtless, be honoured as a 
Saint by the Vicar of Jesus Christ and the Church Universal. Already 
pilgrimages are made to his birthplace, and Barlow Hall is regarded as a 
shrine for his sake. 

Let us conclude this sketch in the words of his ancient biographer. 

" F. Ambrose Barlow having led an Apostolicall life in England for 
above twenty years, done all the good offices of a Prelate, converted many 
to the Catholicke faith, faithfully following his Maister to the last, hath 
now concluded his dales with the maister-piece of charitie, and so sealed 
his doctrine with his owne innocent blood, to the great honour of God's 
Church and St. Benedict's Order, to the confusion of Hereticks, the 
aedification of all Catholickes and to the extraordinary comfort of all 
his Ghostly brethren and children in Christ Jesus. Surely, T)igne in 
memoriam vertitur hominum." 



246 



THE SECRET TREASURE OF CHAIGLEY 

IN a little secluded farm-house, approached by winding lanes and field 
paths, far away from that smoke of chimneys and that throb or 
machinery with which Lancashire is mainly associated in one's mind, 
there lies a hidden treasure, known to very few even of those who 
inhabit the rural hamlets which lie nearest to the spot. The name of the 
place is Hill House, Woodplumpton ; and it is a typical old English farm- 
stead, white and low, roofed with thatch in the good old fashion, lying 
isolated from its neighbours, embowered in orchards, as though it were 
anxious to keep its hidden treasure safe from prying eyes. For this little 
farm-house contains relics of very pathetic interest : relics which take us 
back to the cruel old penal days, when the faithful Catholics of Lancashire 
had to celebrate the rites of their holy religion in secret places, in the 
dead of night and at peril of their liberty, sometimes even of their 
lives. 

An old lady and her daughter inhabit the place, and at the time of our 
visit they were busy making cheeses. We entered this humble home with 
a reverence far greater than would befit many a more stately dwelling ; 
for the mistress of the house is the representative of a grand old 
Lancashire family, who were staunch to the old Faith through dark days. 
And if they are no longer in their old high position in the county, this 
is due, no doubt, to the fidelity with which their forbears had clung to 
a proscribed religion in spite of the cruel fines and exactions which had 
gradually devoured their estates yes, and in spite of crueller things 
than confiscation of property ; for this old farm-house is, in fact, a 
sanctuary where repose the relics of a martyr-priest, and we had come on 
pilgrimage to visit these sacred treasures. 

Our errand was soon explained, and we were led into a small inner 
room. Here was produced an oak chest, evidently of great antiquity. 
The lid is now broken off, and the lock keyless. The chest is about a 
yard long by a foot wide, and curiously carved. The contents of this 
chest were what we had come to see. But before describing them it will 
be well to say something of their history. 

On the fell-side that rises behind the famous Jesuit College of Stony- 
hurst, there stands an old farm-house called Chapel House, in the grounds 
of which formerly stood a chapel dedicated to St. Chad. The Mercian 
Saint has given his name to the village of Chaigley, or Chadgley, near 
which Chapel House stands. Now, at Chaigley Hall there lived for 
many centuries, down to the year 1637, a family named Holden. They 
were of gentle blood, and allied to some of the best-known families of 
the county. John Holden, of Chaigley Hall, died in 1637, leaving no 

247 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

male heir. His daughter and heiress, Mary, married Thomas Brockholes 
of Claughton, Esq., the representative of one of the oldest of the Catholic 
families of Lancashire. One of John's brothers, Henry, became a priest 
and a Doctor of the Sorbonne. Another Henry Holden, probably a 
cousin, also became a priest, and returned to Lancashire to exercise his 
sacred functions. He is said to have lived to a great age, and to have 
died about the time of the Revolution, in 1688. But though the 
Holdens of Chaigley died out in the direct male line, numerous scions 
of their family remain, and are still flourishing in various parts of 
Lancashire ; and, what is more, still constant to the old religion. Nor 
is this wonderful when we know that there has ever been a tradition in 
the family that they had given to God a martyr, a priest of their own 
stock. 

The old oaken chest which we were shown at Woodplumpton con- 
tained this martyr's relics. But who was he, and when did he suffer ? 
Very little is known for certain as to the facts, but these are the family 
traditions which form a very touching story. It would appear that 
during the times of persecution (probably during the Commonwealth, 
when Cromwell's soldiers were let loose on the " Papists " of Lanca- 
shire) a priest was saying Mass in the old chapel of St. Chad at Chapel 
House, Chaigley. The house was then in possession of a member of 
the Holden family, and the priest is supposed to have been a son of the 
house. While he was engaged in the Holy Sacrifice, the soldiers burst 
in upon the little congregation, tore the celebrant from the altar 
and slew him as he stood, clad in his sacred vestments, which were 
deluged with his blood. His head was cut off, and it rolled down the 
altar steps. 

According to one account, the soldiers were carrying this off as a 
trophy upon a pike, when the martyr's mother, who had been present at 
the fearful scene, ran after them and implored them to give it to her. 
One of the men tossed it to her, and she caught it in her apron. From 
that day to this the family has kept this relic, together with the vest- 
ments of the altar and everything that had been used at the martyr's last 
Mass, and has handed them down from father to son as a most sacred 
treasure. For many generations in fact, down to the year 1812 
these precious relics were kept with the greatest possible secrecy. Only 
the head of the family knew of their existence, and shortly before he 
died he confided the secret as a sacred trust to his eldest son. As far as 
we know, there is no other instance of a family treasure of such sacred 
and poignant interest. Wherever the Holdens moved they bore their 
treasure with them ; and they still preserve it, as we ourselves saw, at 
Woodplumpton. 
248 



THE SECRET TREASURE OF CHAIGLEY 

In 1 8 1 2 the relics were in possession of Thomas Holden, at Crawshaw 
Farm, near Stonyhurst. His father, Richard, seems to have settled 
there in 1727. It happened that one of the Stonyhurst Jesuits, Father 
John Fairclough, came one day to see the Holdens at Crawshaw. He 
was shown (I quote from the Stonyhurst Magazine of 1888) an old Mass- 
book with some German writing on the fly-leaf. He asked Holden how 
he came by the rare old volume ; and then was confided to him, doubtless 
with a good deal of hesitation, the family secret. The Mass-book was 
one of a collection of relics handed down for generations past. 

Then the Father was taken to see the treasure, carefully kept under 
lock and key in an oaken chest at the top of the house. He found what 
we are about to describe, and, above all, the martyr's head " still covered 
with its flesh, as soft and fresh as if it had but recently been severed 
from the body." The Father told Holden that there was no longer 
any need to keep their secret, now that the storm of persecution had 
blown over ; and from that day many were the pilgrims who came from 
Stonyhurst and from the country round to see the relics of the martyred 
priest. 

Many years after Father Fairclough's visit, Richard Holden, the 
oldest surviving member of Thomas Holden's family, used to tell how 
he had, as a small boy, discovered the existence of the mysterious chest, 
before the secret had been divulged. He and his sister had heard his 
parents speak of the hidden treasure ; " and each independently, finding 
the key while their parents were absent, had stolen upstairs and peeped 
into the old box. But the unexpected sight of a human head within it 
made them hurry down again, with a scare which they never forgot to 
the end of their lives." 

Before he moved to Crawshaw, the father of Thomas Holden lived 
at another farm-house in the same neighbourhood, called Lambing 
Clough. Here he used sometimes to take the relics and carry them 
down to a quiet place on the river bank, and lay them out to be aired in 
the sunshine. Thomas Holden's eldest son, Henry, inherited the relics, 
and from him they passed to his youngest son, Ralph, as his elder 
brothers had died without children. Ralph moved to Woodplumpton, 
where he died at Hill House, in 1885. It is his widow who now guards 
the sacred deposit. Their son is a priest, and is now Rector of Claughton, 
the old seat of the Brockholes family. 

The reader may imagine with what emotion we gazed at the contents 
of the venerable oaken chest, as they were spread out before us. Here 
were the vestments and altar linen still stained with the martyr's blood ; 
here the chalice, the Missal, and the small silver crucifix which he had 
been using in the sacred function. Here was the treasure that had 
21 249 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

been guarded with such care and fidelity by generation after generation 
of this old Catholic family : the one possession they had clung to and 
preserved, while houses and lands and goods gradually melted away 
under the pressure of the cruel penal laws. But we must describe some 
of the contents of the treasure-chest more minutely. 

There is, first of all, the Missal. It is a small octavo volume, printed 
by Plantin, at Antwerp, in 1570. In it is written the inscription, " Ex 
lib. Hen. Johnsone." Now, Johnson was the alias of Dr. Henry Holden 
of the Sorbonne, so no doubt the book belonged to him. Then, on a 
slip of paper gummed to the fly-leaf are written two lines of German in 
English characters, with the English translation beneath each line, as 
follows : 

" Dieses gehort unserm marter, 
This belongs to our martyr ; 
Und unserm lieben Pfilp, 
And to our dear Philip." 

This writing is not old. It was written by one of the Stonyhurst 
Fathers for the Holdens, who could not read or translate the old inscrip- 
tion, which has now, unfortunately, disappeared. It is a very singular 
fact that it should have been written in German ; it was probably done 
to avoid the attention of Protestants, in case they should ever see 
the book. 

Then there is the altar-stone. It is just a small piece of slate, with 
crosses scratched in the centre and at the four corners, but with no place 
for relics. There are several of these old altar-stones of persecution days 
remaining, and they are all much alike. They had to be small and light ; 
for the hunted priests had to carry them about with them, and, by a 
special privilege, they were allowed to be consecrated without the usual 
relics which it was almost impossible to get in England during the 
persecution. 

And then there is the chalice. St. Chrysostom says that in the early 
days of the Church the priests were of gold and the chalices of wood ; 
but that in his time the case was reversed, and the priests were wood, 
while their chalices were gold. And so in the days ot persecution in 
England, the chalices used by these golden priests, these true-hearted 
servants of Jesus Christ, who ministered to their brethren at the peril of 
their lives, were, as a rule, like this one, merely of pewter. The chalice 
is of the old Gothic shape, six inches high, with a large bowl, four inches 
in diameter. The paten just covers the top of the chalice. 

The altar-cloth (3 ft. by 4 ft.), with a narrow lace border and fringe, 
is stained with blood. In one corner two letters are embroidered in 
black silk ; apparently they are P.H., and they would seem to stand for 
250 




s 



o 



THE SECRET TREASURE OF CHAIGLEY 

Philip Holden. Then there are : a linen sheet (about 6 ft. by 8 ft.) ; a 
Communion cloth (about 10 ft. by I ft.), which is deeply stained with 
blood ; some fragments of candles, evidently home-made, of unbleached 
beeswax, with plain cotton wicks ; a small silver crucifix, corporals, palls, 
a purificator, amice, and large alb. This last article has a large stain of 
blood in front. There are two chasubles : the first Gothic, and very 
much faded and mutilated. It was of green silk, embroidered with 
fleurs-de-lis, and the pillar of red silk has in its centre the chalice and 
Host and the sacred monogram. 

But the other chasuble seems to have been the one worn at the 
martyr's sacrifice ; for it is stained with his blood. It is made of ribbed 
white silk, embroidered with flowers. On the cross behind is embroidered 
in old Gothic letters the inscription : 

" Orate p. aiabs Oliver! Wastlei 
Et Ellene uxoris ejus." 

Finally, we come to the relic the martyr's head. It is still partly 
covered with flesh, and part of the neck remains. It is no longer in 
the state of preservation in which Father Fairclough found it nearly a 
hundred years ago. " The flesh is brown and shrivelled and sunk into 
the crevices of the bones, and in some parts fallen away into dust. The 
right side is more perfect than the left. Here you can distinctly see the 
close-shaven hairs of the whiskers, and the place where the ear has been 
cut off. The neck has not been separated from the body at the joining 
of the vertebrae, but cut straight through with a sharp instrument. All 
the teeth are now missing, and a considerable portion of the flesh has 
been cut away from the neck." This was done in order to give relics to 
the pilgrims who came to Crawshaw after the existence of the relics was 
made known. But one day, the story goes, as some one was cutting the 
neck, the head uttered, or seemed to utter, " a kind of whistling noise " ; 
and the Holdens were frightened and resolved to let no more of it be 
cut away. But it is a great pity that these pious depredations were ever 
permitted. 

It seems sad to think that we shall probably never know more as to 
the identity of this martyr priest. The family tradition is that he was 
Philip Holden, but no priest of this name is known. The inscription in 
the Missal hardly suggests that "our dear Philip" and "our martyr" 
were one and the same person. The learned writer in the Stonyhurst 
Magazine to whom we are so much indebted, and from whose minute 
account of the relics and their history we have freely quoted, sug- 
gests that it may have been Henry Holden the younger, whose death 
about the time of the Revolution of 1688 is chronicled by Dodd the 

251 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

historian. But it seems strange that Dodd had not heard that he died a 
martyr. 

The mystery will perhaps never be fully solved. In any case, the 
story of these relics is well worth putting on record, on account of the 
touching fidelity with which they have been treasured by the Holden 
family. The family is said never to have been without a priest among 
its members, and it looks upon this fact as a sign of God's blessing 
through the intercession of its own martyr. That there is foundation 
for the family tradition, the relics bear eloquent witness ; and though we 
may never learn all the truth, we know enough to honour the Chaigley 
martyr as one of that white-robed army which bear the victor's palm 
before the Throne of God. 



252 




INTP:RIOR OF THE COURT, HARVINGTON HALL 

The x marks the crevice in the beam which communicates with the 
priests' hiding-place. Photo by Thomas Lewis, Birmingham 



To face page 2.53 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 
HIS HOME AND HIS FLOCK 

IT was one of those exquisite days of " St. Luke's little summer," 
when the English climate seems to relent for a moment in its 
headlong progress towards wintry gloom, and turn back with 
regret towards the vanished glories of summer, a day flooded 
with golden October sunshine, mild and mellow as the apples that 
gleamed scarlet and gold upon the laden branches of the orchards, when 
a little band of pilgrims set out for North Worcestershire, to visit the 
scenes consecrated by the life and labours of a martyred priest, a son of 
the Poor Man of Assisi, known as the Venerable John Wall ; in religion 
Father Joachim of St. Anne of the Friars Minor. 

The party consisted of a man of science, who acted as our guide ; 
a young Rhodes Scholar from Oxford, whose home was in distant Natal ; 
and the present chronicler. It was our aim to visit a group of houses 
which had sheltered the martyred priest during his apostolic labours, and 
to glean what traditions we could of his life and sufferings in the district 
which had been his home. 

We started from the ancient town of Bromsgrove, after having paid 
a visit to the fine old parish church, magnificently situated on a hill-top 
overlooking the town at its feet. The fabric has indeed greatly suffered 
both from the iconoclasm of Cromwell and his soldiers, and also from the 
well-meant but disastrous zeal of the modern architect who restored it. 
It still, however, contains many features of interest for Catholics, notably 
the fine fifteenth-century tombs of the Talbots of Grafton, lords of this 
country a grand old Catholic stock that came to so sad an end, a 

feneration back, in the person of the last Catholic Earl of Shrews- 
ury. It was in fact owing to a half-obliterated inscription on one 
of these tombs that the present Protestant holders succeeded in making 
good their claim to the Shrewsbury title and to the broad lands of 
the Talbots. Grafton Manor itself is hard by, and its beautiful old 
chapel, Catholic within living memory, but now desecrated, tells its 
own sad tale. 

But we were not bound for Grafton on this occasion, but for 
Harvington. Six miles along the Kidderminster Road brought us to 
Chaddesley Corbet, a typical old English village, full of the most 
delightful black-and-white houses, with one splendid old Elizabethan 
inn, with quaint porches approached by flights of steps at either end, 
and in the midst a fine old signboard bearing the Talbot arms. But 
the glory of Chaddesley Corbet is the church, a structure of intense 

2 53 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

interest, with a nave of Transitional Norman, and a chancel of the 
richest and most exquisite Decorated work, far surpassing in beauty 
what is usually found even in our favoured land of fine parish 
churches. 

Reserving, however, the church and its monuments for detailed 
inspection on our return, we hastened on our way to Harvington Hall, 
about a mile farther on. As we entered the lane leading to it, the leader 
of our little company, who had known every inch of this country from 
his boyhood, broke out with the exclamation : " I always think, when I 
come along this road, of the words, ' Take off thy shoes from off thy 
feet, for the place where thou standest is holy ground.' ' It was the 
more striking an utterance as the speaker, alone of the pilgrims, had not 
the happiness to be a Catholic. 

In a few minutes more we were standing, in silence, upon a green 
common, facing the moated mansion we had come to seek. How 
majestic it was even in its decay ! It rose before us, its old brick-work 
wreathed and crowned with ivy, the wide, encircling moat green with 
sweet sedge and water-lilies, the desolateness of the whole striking a 
note of sadness as it spoke of an heroic time now passing away. As 
we stood there gazing, almost awestruck, a loud whirr of wings above 
our heads startled us, as two great swans flapped slowly past us, and 
splashed into the moat beyond. No other sound of life there was, 
though the Hall does not stand altogether isolated. On our right as 
we faced it, across the green, was the Hall farm, where kindly 
Catholics welcomed us as pilgrims to the shrine they loved, while 
on our left was the cheering sign that the Faith planted here by the 
martyred son of St. Francis had not died out, for here in this lonely 
spot was a pretty Catholic church, with its churchyard around it, and 
hard by, the presbytery, embowered in a walled garden teeming with 
fruit trees. 

In the midst of the churchyard stands a large crucifix. To this we 
first directed our steps and, on its base, we read the following inscription : 

" DEUS MEUS ET OMNIA. 

IN MEMORY OF 

FATHER JOHN WALL, O.S.F., 

IN RELIGION FATHER JOACHIM OF ST. ANNE, 

WHO, OBEYING GOD RATHER THAN MAN, 
FOR TWELVE YEARS MINISTERED THE SACRAMENTS TO THE 

FAITHFUL 

IN THIS AND OTHER PARTS OF WORCESTERSHIRE 
IN DAILY PERIL OF DEATH." 

On the back ot the cross was the following : 
254 




THE BANQUETING-ROOM AND STAIRCASE 
HARV1NGTON HALL 

The x high up in the centre marks the position of the hiding- 
place under the stairs. Photo by Thomas Lewis 



To face page 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

" HE WAS BORN I 620, 
ORDAINED PRIEST 1646, 

WAS TAKEN AT RUSHOCK COURT, DECEMBER, 1678, 
AND PUT TO DKATH FOR THE FAITH 

AT WORCESTER, 
ON THE OCTAVE OF THE ASSUMPTION, 1679." 

Here, then, the note was struck, for this visit of ours was no vulgar 
excursion, but a pilgrimage. 

This touching monument was erected in 1879, when the bicentenary 
of the martyrdom was celebrated at Harvington with great solemnity. 
Its erection was chiefly owing to the zeal of a member of the martyr's 
order, and the example set by this good Franciscan in thus commemo- 
rating the labours and passion of the martyr in the chosen place of his 
abode, is one that it would be well to follow in the case of other 
martyrs. 

Father Wall has indeed never been forgotten amid these beautiful 
pastoral scenes of fruitful Worcestershire, any more than Father Postgate 
has been on his own wild Yorkshire moors. But though enshrined in 
the hearts of the people, it is surely fitting that our martyrs should also 
have some visible, tangible memorial amid the scenes of their heroic 
labours for God. 

We entered the little church to spend a few minutes in prayer before 
the Tabernacle, where the King of Martyrs held His court. 

It was time to turn to the old Hall. Our photographs will describe 
it better than any words can do. 

Three centuries ago it was one of the finest and most substantial of 
the many moated mansions of the Worcestershire gentry. It is majestic 
even now. Though the greater part of the present building would 
appear to be Elizabethan in date, the middle portion of the principal 
front between the eastern " tower " and the western noble pile must 
undoubtedly have been standing in all its picturesque beauty more than 
four hundred years ago. 

We pass over the stone bridge which has replaced the ancient draw- 
bridge that once spanned the moat, as our guide points out to us the 
sweet sedge (Acorus calamus], a rare plant in Worcestershire, and still 

trowing luxuriantly in its waters. It was formerly used for strewing the 
oors of hall and chapel, yes, and for making a pallet for the hunted 
priest in the secret hiding-places of the old Hall. 

The old oaken doors of the gateway still hang on their hinges, and 
still bear traces of the stormy days they have witnessed. We were 
shown a hole made in them by a bullet aimed at the heroic mistress of 
the house, the martyr's hostess, Mary, Lady Yate, when a howling mob 

255 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of Protestant fanatics came over from Kidderminster to search the Hall 
for priests. What an eloquent story that hole seems to tell ! 

On entering within the oaken doors you pass, under the gateway, a 
deep square tunnel, leading to the inner court. On the left, as you enter 
under the gateway, is a large beam lying crosswise as a support to the 
upright woodwork of which each side of the gateway is formed. That 
oak beam must be noted, for it has a hole pierced through it obliquely 
(but which is now plastered over) large enough to admit a man's hand, 
and this hole communicates with a secret hiding-place within. Through 
this orifice letters or food could be passed to the priest concealed in the 
little chamber, access to which is gained, as we shall see, from within the 
mansion. 

On entering the courtyard we have the main body of the Hall on 
our left. It is a very noble pile, built of old brickwork, with square- 
headed mullioned windows and facings of cut stone. The main part of 
this front is recessed within a huge arch, which gives a very striking 
character to the whole design. There are doors in the angles of this 
arch, one of which communicates with the grand staircase. 

Though in a very tottering and dilapidated condition, the old Hall, with 
its massive walls and many passages and turnings, still presents an admirable 
specimen of the ancient Catholic mansion of the penal days. A huge mass 
of ivy covers the greater part of this front and roof, and threatens the 
whole Hall with speedy destruction. Though the front facing the moat is 
still inhabited, this principal wing is in a sad state of decay, with roof 
half gone and windows broken, so that its final destruction can only be a 
question of a few years. It is very melancholy to think that so precious a 
relic of the days of persecution should thus be doomed to inevitable ruin. 

On entering the door at the farther angle of the recessed front, we 
come at once on the grand staircase. This is indeed a noble feature of 
the house. It is all of solid oak, with massive turned balusters and 
uprights of sixteenth-century date. It goes up two stories of the house. 
An American gentleman, we were told, had wanted some months ago to 
carry it off bodily, and erect it in a fine new mansion he was building. 
But, fortunately, he gave up the project. This is the more satisfactory, 
as it is by this very staircase that entrance is gained to one of the three 
priests' hiding-holes for which Harvington Hall is famous.* At the top, 
* Since our last visit to Harvington, we have heard that Sir William Throckmorton 
has actually removed this grand old staircase and set it up at Coughton. This deplorable 
act of vandalism will naturally hasten on the complete ruin of Harvington Hall, and it is 
to be feared that before long this historic house, with all its Catholic associations, will have 
disappeared. The staircase has been completely remodelled and now forms a double 
approach to the tribune of the ancient chapel at Coughton Court, which is now converted 
into a ballroom. 

2 S 6 




ENTRANCE TO THE HIDING-HOLE IN 
THE STAIRCASE, HARV1NGTON HALL 

Photo by Thomas Lewis 



Tof.nepage 256 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

on the landing, is a passage approached by two or three steps. One of 
these, a three-cornered stair, moves down on secret hinges and discloses, 
when removed, a small hole about sixteen inches square, which is, in fact, 
the entrance to the principal hiding-hole. Within is a chamber 5 ft. 
9 in. long, by 5 ft. wide, its height being 6 ft. On its floor, until 
quite recently, was the self-same thick sedge mat-bed, on which had lain 
the venerable Franciscan martyr (and, no doubt, many another martyr 
and confessor of the Faith) when a sudden visit by magistrate or pur- 
suivants forced him to fly for refuge and concealment. This has mostly 
now disappeared, carried off by pious visitors as relics. Air is admitted 
by a singular contrivance in the roof. 

The reader can imagine with what interest our Rhodes Scholar gazed 
on this relic of the days when his Catholic forefathers had to suffer so 
much for the Faith in the old country. He would not be content without 
slipping through the narrow entrance into the close, confined chamber, 
which had once held the martyr priest, perhaps for days at a time. It 
was, in fact, a spot upon which few could gaze without emotion. We 
pictured the martyr lying silent and patient in his confinement. He had 
secured himself against intruders by closing and bolting a strong little 
oak door across the narrow entrance. The pursuivants must often have 
passed within a few inches of their victim without being able to detect 
his hiding-place. In the banqueting hall close by, a door admits to a 
small cupboard or pantry, the low ceiling of which conceals the priest's 
retreat. From this cupboard a small chink communicates with the 
hiding-place, through which, at a moment when the attention of the 
enemy was called elsewhere, a word could be whispered, or some small 
portion of food passed through for the captive's refreshment. The 
existence of this hiding-place has been most carefully concealed, and 
though now the entrance to it is visible, at the time when it was in use 
it would have needed a very practised eye to detect it. It is probable, 
too, that the captive could hear, through tiny holes pierced in the brick- 
work and concealed beneath the decorated plaster of the frieze, what was 
passing in the banqueting hall below him. 

Let us now descend to the first story, and enter the banqueting hall. 
It is a room of stately proportions, once panelled in oak and hung with 
costly tapestry. The tapestry has been carried off to Coughton, the seat 
of Sir William Throckmorton, the owner of Harvington, and the panel- 
ling has, alas ! also disappeared. We were told that it now adorned the 
drawing-room of an Anglican clergyman in Oxford. On entering, we 
have at our left the door of the little pantry of which we have spoken, 
which is, in fact, immediately under the hiding-hole already described. 
Next to this door is a fine mullioned window of great size. 

2 K 257 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

From the banqueting hall opens another room of great interest. It is 
known as Lady Yate's bedroom, although in some accounts it is styled 
the reception-room. It is still panelled in oak, painted green, and has a 
coved ceiling. This room runs along the front of the house, facing the 
moat. It has recently. been put in repair, and is now inhabited by an old 
lady, who most kindly permitted us to examine it minutely. On either 
side of the fireplace is a door. The one on the right, that is on the side 
facing the moat, leads to a china-closet. The left-hand door opens on a 
long corridor which runs across the gateway, and connects this part of 
the Hall with the tower on the other side. (These doors were, it would 
seem, originally sliding panels.) In this corridor is the second hiding- 
place. Thus, if at the time the pursuivants arrived the priest was with 
the family in the banqueting hall, he had two means of escape. He could 
fly to the staircase on the left, or to the right through this room to the 
corridor beyond, which communicates with the tower. But the hunted 
priest had no need to hasten along this corridor, for, just inside the 
sliding panel, he could stoop down and raise up three thick boards from 
the flooring, which form a trap-door to the hiding-place. The original 
ladder, with its broad oaken staves, still remains fixed against the wall. 
The priest could quietly descend the eight strong steps, and, before 
reaching the bottom, close and bolt the trap-door over his head. Even 
if the pursuivants discovered the sliding panel, they would be baffled 
here, for the boards are thick and give no hollow sound, however hard 
you kick them. The only way of reaching the priest would be by tearing 
up this floor, and there is nothing whatever to show that the three planks 
which form the trap-door are any different from the rest of the flooring. 
When one is in this hiding-place, a chink is visible near the outer corner of 
the chimney-stack, which goes up several feet high to the floor above ; and 
it was this hole that communicated with the oak beam under the gate- 
way, to which allusion has already been made. In this second hiding- 
place the poor priest could only manage to stand upright. It has no 
floor but the loose, dry earth. This hole is 8 ft. deep and 4 ft. by 
2 ft. wide. As one who for many years was priest at Harvington has 
written : " When you stand in it, making your devout meditation on the 
sufferings and joys of the martyrs, you feel as if you were encased in a 
venerable, saintly relic." 

But we must leave this spot, and return through the banqueting hall 
to the staircase landing. Here a door on our left leads to a passage 
which communicates with more rooms. We pass through this door, and 
take the first door to our right, down the passage. Five steps lead us 
up into a narrow room panelled in oak. It is about 12 ft. long by 8 ft. 
broad. This is called Dodd's Library, because it is the room where the 
258 




STAIRCASE SHOWING POSITION OF HIDING-HOLE 

Photo by Sir Benjamin Stone 




LADY YATE'S BEDROOM 

On the lefty through the doorway, is seen the open trap-door leading 
to the hiding-place by the gateway. Photo by Thomas Lewis 



To face page 258 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

famous church historian and controversialist, Hugh Tootel (known as 
Charles Dodd), kept his books. The old bookcases still remain, though 
in a sadly dilapidated condition, but the books (each bearing the inscrip- 
tion " Eibl. Harvin. Cler. S<fc."~) and a very valuable and fascinating set 
of rare old books they are have been removed for safe-keeping to St. 
Mary's College, Oscott. This was done in the time of Bishop Milner. 

At the end of the room opposite the window is a large cupboard in 
the panelled wall. It is about 5 ft. from the floor, and it needs some 
agility to pull oneself up into it. This, how- 
ever we did, and found that we were easily 
able to stand upright in it. The cupboard, 
in fact, is about 7 ft. high by 4 ft. broad. 
On the left side, as you face the window, is a 
huge oaken beam embedded in the brickwork 
of the wall, apparently one of the main beams 
of the house. But all things are not what they 
seem, especially at Harvington. Our guide 
proceed to show us that this huge beam is 
hung on a pivot, and when the lower end is 
pressed it yields to the pressure, swings back 
into the wall, and discovers a hole through 
which a man can creep. The pivot is an iron 
rod which passes right through the middle of 
the beam and sticks out about two inches on 
either side into holes made in the brickwork. 
Once you have crept through you find yourself 
in a large hiding-hole about 8 ft. long, 2 ft. 
broad, and 6 ft. high. Inside the movable 

beam, at the lower end, is a strong iron staple, through which, once 
within the hole, you can pass a bolt, and so secure yourself from 
intrusion. It would need a very skilful pursuivant to discover this 
hiding-place. Indeed, it was so skilfully made that the Catholics of 
Harvington had no idea of its existence till quite recently, when during 
some alterations it was accidentally discovered by a priest who was 
staying there. It had probably remained forgotten and unknown for 
some two centuries. 

At present there is another means of access to this hiding-hole. If 
you leave the library and go along the passage, you soon come to a 
winding staircase, which is known as the chapel stair. Mount this and 
you come to a small closet, opening from a landing. Inside this closet 
a hole communicates with the hiding-place. But it is doubtful whether 
there was any original access to it from this side, though it is probable 

259 




FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

that there was a chink of communication through which, as in the other 
two hiding-places, notes or food could be passed. Possibly it would be 
only liquid food, such as broth or milk, which the imprisoned priest 
could take through a straw. 

It is very interesting to notice the ecclesiastical designs roughly 
stencilled in black and red on the open rafters of this winding staircase. 
These were, no doubt, intended as a guide to the faithful to the place 
where Mass was celebrated, and they would pass unnoticed by those not 
initiated. 

At the top of the staircase is a large room known as " Lady Yate's 
Nursery." It has windows in every direction, so that those on watch 
here could see if any one were approaching the house from any side. 
For this is indeed the ante-room to the secret chapel. Three steps lead 
up from it into the little sanctuary where the martyr was wont to offer 
up the Adorable Sacrifice. The door is latticed, and beside it is an 
opening of lattice-work, so that the watchers kneeling in " Lady Yate's 
Nursery " could yet assist at the holy mysteries within. 

The walls of the chapel were, at some early date, carefully decorated 
in good Gothic style, with foliage, vine stems, pomegranates, pots of 
lilies, and scroll-work in red. There are three windows in the chapel, 
but those by the altar have been blocked up. We were touched to see 
two swallows' nests built in the angle of the wall over the place where 
once the altar stood, recalling to the mind the psalmist's words : " The 
swallow hath found her a nest where she may lay her young, even Thine 
altar, O Lord of Hosts." 

We had to tread with great caution on the floors, for the boards were 
very rotten, and the whole place seemed fast going to ruin. Looking 
out of the windows of the " Nursery " towards the front of the house, 
we found the roofs below covered with a luxuriant drapery of polypody 
fern, which made a beautiful harmony of colour with the old red tiles. 

A few steps up to the narrow doorway leads us on to the roof, from 
which we get access to various lumber-rooms and closets, fitted in among 
its ponderous and complicated timbers. These rooms communicate with 
each other in most bewildering confusion, and seem admirably adapted 
for the purposes of concealment or escape. 

I have come across an old account of Harvington Hall, printed a 
good many years back, from which I have gleaned the information that 
follows : 

" The priests' rooms were at the top of the house, at the farther end 
of a dimly lighted passage. Near by is a large room which has always 
gone by the name of ' the chapel,' in which still hang tatters of the 
tapestry. This is supposed to be the room used as a chapel in the 
260 




"LADY YATE'S NURSERY" 

The steps in the corner lead to the secret chapti. Photo l>\ Sir Betjamin Stone 




THE LABYRINTH OF PASSAGES AROUND THE 
SECRET CHAPEL 

Photo by Sir Benjamin Stone 



To face page 260 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

darkest days, when the other room was not considered secure. Guard 
could be safely kept by persons standing in the long passage, for it was 
thought well to have more than one room set apart for Holy Mass, 
so as to baffle the pursuivants more effectually. Doubtless Father Wall 
often said Mass in either room. 

"A third chapel within the precincts of the moat was built in 1743, 
and is also very interesting, though it has, of course, no connection with 
the martyrs. Outside, it appears like two cottages. Within, a handsome 
oak staircase leads to the ' upper room,' where the divine mysteries were 
celebrated for the Catholics of Harvington, Kidderminster, and the 
neighbourhood. 

" At the farther end of this room is still standing the quaint old altar 
step, a very shallow one of oak, overpassing the rider, and worked round 
at each corner. The sacristy was behind the altar and is approached by 
a small door. But the chief interest of this chapel, to us, lies in the fact 
that it was the depository for many years of some priceless relics of the 
days of persecution. 

" These consisted of sundry small chalices that would fit inside each 
other, a long candle, sacerdotal vestments, books, including the old 
register, and a curious box strongly clamped with brass. These most 
precious relics of our martyrs were placed under the old altar in this 
chapel. They were in course of time forgotten, and priests of later days 
were not aware that the altar could be opened. However, the late Mrs. 
Anne Parkes, who in the early part of the nineteenth century was entrusted 
by the priest with the care of the altar, one day, when dusting behind it, 
observed through a chink in the panelling some glittering objects inside 
the altar. She specially noticed the chalices, the gold lace of the vest- 
ments, and the large book. Unfortunately, Father Marsden, the priest 
in charge, was just leaving home, and when he returned very weary on 
Friday night, he decided to inspect the treasures next day. But, alas ! 
that very night a fire broke out in the room beneath, and the chapel and 
altar were soon in flames. Before it could be extinguished the whole of 
these hidden treasures of bygone days were in ashes. In the confusion, 
some one threw the smouldering heap into the moat, and when this was 
emptied some years later, tiny bits of gold lace and a mass of molten 
metal were found there. 

"Who knows what treasures perished in that fatal fire of 1823 ? 
Very likely the clamped box held relics of the martyrs. In any case, 
the books, vestments, and chalices were of themselves most precious 
relics, whose loss we can never sufficiently deplore." 

But it is time that the reader learned something of the life of the 
glorious martyr for whose dear sake Harvington Hall has become a 

261 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

shrine of pilgrimage, yes, and of the noble lady, his hostess, who risked 
her life to give him shelter, and thus secure the sacraments of God's 
Church for herself and the little flock of the faithful round about. 

Mary, Lady Yate, was the elder of the two daughters and co- heiresses 
of Humphrey Packington, Lord of Chaddesley Corbet, who died in 1631. 
She married Sir John Yate of Buckland, County Berks, Bart. Her 
portrait, of which we are happily able to give a reproduction, now hangs 
at Coughton Court, the seat of her descendants, the present owner of 
Harvington. Lady Yate's father was a Protestant, but her mother 
belonged to a good old Catholic family which had suffered much for the 
faith : she was Abigail, daughter of Henry Sacheverell of Morley, 
County Derby. Lady Yate seems to have been born and brought up at 
Harvington, until her marriage. Her husband belonged to another 
family illustrious for their fidelity to the old religion. It will be remem- 
bered that Blessed Edmund Campion was taken in 1581 at the house of 
a Mrs. Yate at Lyford, and Lyford is close to Buckland. Thus Lady 
Yate was closely connected with two families of tried fidelity, and she 
was herself not unworthy of them. By her father's death the manor of 
Chaddesley Corbet fell to her share, but her mother had a life interest in it, 
and so the latter lady resided at Harvington Hall till her holy death in 1 657. 
Next year Sir John Yate also died, and his widow retired to Harvington, 
which she henceforth made her home. She gave up her life to good 
works, and especially to the maintenance and propagation of the Catholic 
religion in the district in which she lived. It must have been soon after 
her return to Harvington that she took the holy Franciscan, Father 
Joachim of St. Anne (otherwise John Wall), under her roof, for he came on 
the English mission in 1656, two years previously, and we know that the 
greater part of his missionary career was spent at Harvington. 

John Wall was a Lancashire man, and was born in 1 620, probably at 
Chingle or Singleton Hall, in Goosnargh parish, being the fourth son of 
Anthony Wall, the first of the name to hold Chingle. His younger 
brother William became a Benedictine monk at Lambspring Abbey, and 
was also tried and condemned to death, for his priesthood, during the 
Gates plot frenzy. He was, however, subsequently reprieved. John 
had a happier lot : he was to gain the martyr's crown and palm. 

His early life is soon told. Educated first at the English College of 
Douay, and then at Rome, he was ordained priest in the Eternal City in 
1645, his name being entered in the College lists as John Marsh. At 
the age of thirty-two he took the Franciscan habit at the Convent of St. 
Bonaventure at Douay, that convent which has been the nursery of so 
many glorious martyrs ; and there he made his holy profession on 
January i, 1652. 
262 




I 



I ^ 



K * 



t-, ^~* 

Z s 

r^ 5 

^ ja -. 

H 5 > 

O Q S 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

He took the name of Joachim of St. Anne, on account of his tender 
devotion to our Blessed Lady, and perhaps, as Miss Stone suggests, in 
memory of a pilgrimage which he had made on leaving Rome, to our Lady's 
house at Loreto, where he seems to have received the grace of his 
religious vocation. After serving as Vicar and Master of Novices in 
his convent, he was sent on the English mission in 1656. Here he 
laboured for over twenty years chiefly, if not entirely, in North Worces- 
tershire, under the assumed names of Francis Johnson or Webb. 

Our martyr did not come to England alone : he was one of a little 
band of friars, of whom he himself and the energetic Father Leo 
Randolph were the leaders. They first made their way to the old 
Manor House of Wood-Bevington, in the parish of Salford Priors in 
Warwickshire. This was the home of Father Leo, and was at that time 
in possession of his father, Ferrers Randolph, Esquire. 

The Manor House of Wood-Bevington, which is still standing, was 
even then an old building. It seems to have been erected about 1490, 
by the Austin Canons of Kenilworth Priory, for their first lessee, William 
Grey. It is in the half-timbered style, though it has now, unfortunately, 
been modernised and covered with rough-cast. 

The manor passed to the Ferrers of Baddesley Clinton by the marriage 
of Elizabeth, granddaughter of William Grey, to Edward Ferrers, second 
son to Sir Edward Ferrers of Baddesley. He died September 16, 1578, 
leaving only daughters, of whom the eldest, Elizabeth, married Thomas 
Randolph of Codrington, in Buckinghamshire, and became Lady of the 
Manor of Wood-Bevington. Their eldest son, Ferrers Randolph, was 
in possession of the manor when Dugdale wrote his history of Warwick- 
shire in 1656. He was not, however, the owner, for in 1636 he had 
sold the manor to St. John's College, Oxford. The same year the 
College granted him a lease of it for three hundred years, at the 
annual rent of 200. 

It was thus to his father's house that Father Leo led the little band 
of Franciscan missionaries, and here they received a warm welcome and 
a safe shelter, while they discussed their future plans. It was decided 
that Father Joachim Wall was to have charge of Worcestershire, that his 
companions were to go north to labour in Yorkshire, while Father Leo 
took Warwickshire and Staffordshire as the sphere of his apostolate. 

Before we leave this holy and zealous friar, we may add that a very 
interesting relic of him still remains in the old register belonging to St. 
Peter's Church, Birmingham, which records the results of his missionary 
labours, and is now preserved at St. Mary's College, Oscott. 

The first entry in this register, under the heading of those " admitted 
into the Confraternity of the Cord of St. Francis," is " Elizabeth Randolph 

263 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of Bevington, County of Warwick, ifth of September 1657." This 
was probably the friar's own mother. In October 1657, we find him 
registering the marriage of Thomas Wheatley and Margaret Walden of 
Tanworth, as celebrated " in Bevington." In the same autumn he is 
baptizing a child at Solihull, and giving the last rites of the Church to 
three dying persons at Edgbaston. It was Father Leo Randolph who 
built the first public church in Birmingham, in Mass-house Lane, in 
1688 ; it was dedicated to his own patroness, St. Mary Magdalene, 
though its present successor bears the title of St. Peter. In the list of 
benefactors who contributed to the erection of this church, King James II. 
has the first place, with a gift of timber to the value of ^180. The 
Dowager Queen Catherine gave 10 155. 

It was Father Leo Randolph who obtained the head of his martyred 
confrere after the cruel execution at Worcester, and sent it over to Douay. 
His apostolic labours recorded in the precious register give us an idea of 
what Father Wall's must have been, which is the more valuable, since 
the records of our martyr's apostolate have so unhappily perished. We 
read that Father Leo reconciled his kinsman, Edward Ferrers of Baddesley 
Clinton, on December 10, 1660, and that he buried him at Baddesley 
on January 7, 1664. At Bevington, Salford Priors, Alcester, Tamworth, 
Baddesley, Edgbaston, Birmingham, and many other places we find the 
Franciscan drawing souls to God's Church. With his life in his hands, 
he never wearied in doing God's work; until in 1695, at the close of 
his long ministry, he could thank God that he had been instrumental in 
converting no fewer than six hundred and eighty-nine souls to the Faith 
of their fathers. 

One of these converts has a special interest for us. One day when 
Father Wall was engaged on his perilous ministry, not very long, indeed, 
before his capture, he happened to be at King's Norton, near Birmingham. 
Here he had a very narrow escape of being arrested, and was only saved 
by a Protestant gentleman who took pity on him, and, at his own peril, 
concealed him in his house. The good Franciscan could not find words 
to express his gratitude, but before leaving his benefactor he said to him : 
" If it please God that I have to die for the Faith, I will offer my life's 
blood for your soul." The gentleman's name was Thomas Millward. 
The martyr's holocaust was accepted by God, and five years after the 
tragedy at Worcester we find recorded in Father Randolph's register, 
among those reconciled to the Faith : " A.D. 1684. Thomas ^Millward of 
Kings Norton, County of Worcester^ lyth January.'" "Amen, Amen, I say 
to you, he that receiveth whomsoever I send, receiveth Me, and he 
that receiveth Me, receiveth Him that sent Me." 

The room can still be identified in the old Manor House of Wood- 
264 




DAME MARY YATE 

From her portrait at Caught on Court 



To face pa%e 264 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

Bevington where these Franciscan apostles first said Holy Mass and 
administered the Sacraments. It was called the " great parlour." No 
other room would be so suitable for the purpose, as it was in a retired situa- 
tion, and had a secluded doorway into the garden. It is a large room, 
wainscoted with fine old Tudor panelling, which has been painted, 
probably in the early part of the eighteenth century. The doorway into 
the garden has been long stopped up, and the space between the outer 
and inner doors is now a small closet, where you can still see the remains 
of the old panelling which lined the little passage through the wall. 

In the old-fashioned garden, with its ancient walnut-trees (planted, 
according to tradition, by five sisters), we may still imagine we see our 
holy martyr pacing up and down, saying his office, and pleading before 
God for the souls of his countrymen. 

But it is at Harvington, above all, that we find him. Almost do we 
catch sight of him, in his russet robe and bare feet, passing swiftly along 
the dim, mysterious passages that lead to the hidden chapel in the roof. 
Still is his memory green among the descendants of his little flock, who 
cherish with a holy pride their traditions of " Blessed Father Johnson," 
their martyred pastor. 

For it is as Johnson that he was known at Harvington, and under this 
name his beloved memory was handed down to generation after genera- 
tion of faithful Catholics, as ever on his anniversary the priest reminded 
the little flock of the glorious martyrdom of him who had once been 
their shepherd. Still at East Bergholt Abbey, in Essex, is reverently pre- 
served a large piece of the rope with which the " Blessed Mr. Johnson " 
was hanged at Worcester, August 22, 1679, in the same month that saw 
good old Father Postgate die for the same holy cause at the York Tyburn. 
It is for his sake that Harvington is and ever will be so dear to every 
Catholic heart. 

On our way back from Harvington we stayed at Chaddesley Corbet to 
refresh ourselves in the picturesque old inn, and to visit the very beautiful 
church hard by. The church contains a very curious Saxon, or early 
Norman, font, carved with strange, interlaced dragons. The chancel is 
in the Middle Pointed style, and as fair a specimen as it would be possible 
to find of that most beautiful period of English Gothic. The exquisite 
Decorated tracery of the windows, the enriched buttresses, the sedilia 
and piscina, and other features breathe a refinement of artistic feeling 
such as is rarely surpassed even in our noblest ecclesiastical buildings. 

But what attracted us most in the church was the tomb of Lady 
Yate, the brave hostess of our martyr, and those of her family 
around it. They are in the North Chapel, which is the family chantry 
and was, of old, dedicated to St. Nicholas. 

2 L 265 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

We copied the epitaph of the Lady of Harvington Hall : 

" Here lies the Eldest Daughter and Coheire of Humphrey Pack- 
ington, Esqre., Lord of ye Manor of Chadesley Corbet, and the 
incomparable Widow of Sir John Yate, of Buckland, Knight and Baronett, 
the Lady Mary Yate, of pious memory, whose loss is too great to be 
forgotten. 

" She lived for the common good, and died for her own. 

" She lived too well to fear death, and could not have died if the 
prayers of the poor had prevailed. Her prudence in ye management of 
a bad world was 'alwaies aiming at a better. 

" Her justice was more than exact in paying all she owed, even 
before it was due. 

" Her fortitude was built upon her faith, a rock which no storm 
could move. 

" Her temperance was grounded on her Hope and Charity, wch 
raised her heart so much above ye world that she used it without 
enjoying it. 

" She bestowed it liberally upon those who needed it, lived in it as 
unconcernedly as if she had never loved it, and left it as easily as if she 
had allwaise despised it. 

" Ripe for Heaven, and as full of vertue as of daies, she died in ye 
86th year of her age, the 1 2th day of June in the year of our Lord 1696, 
after having been lady of this manor 65 years. 

" REQUIESCAT IN PACE 

" This is a dutyful tribute erected by her daughter, Apolonia Yate." 
" Her fortitude was built upon her faith, a rock which no storm could move." 

How touching those words sounded when one thought of the hiding- 
places and the secret chapels of the old Hall we had just left, and realised 
that they meant a life of constant peril, for it was death to harbour a 
priest : a life exposed to continual terrors, sudden invasions and attacks : 
a life crushed beneath the burden of cruel fines and iniquitous exactions ! 
Daily to see the estate grow more impoverished, daily to endure some 
fresh injury, daily to live in a home that had no sanctity, no privacy ; to be 
the object of hatred and suspicion ; to see the priest you loved and 
venerated torn away from you to a cruel death, and to be able to do 
nothing to protect or save him this was all summed up in these few 
words of her epitaph, every line of which breathes a daughter's love. 
This daughter, Apollonia, it may be noted, remained unmarried, and was 
distinguished for her filial piety and virtuous life. The elder daughter, 
Abigail, married Charles, Viscount Fairfax, of Gilling Castle, in Yorkshire. 
266 




u 



o 



kJ 

5 



o! 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

Lady Yate has left many marks of her charity and benevolence. She 
built and endowed in perpetuity at Harvington three almshouses for poor 
widows. She also founded and endowed a permanent charity for the 
purpose of putting out poor children into respectable apprenticeships. 
At the accession of James II., when Catholics began to breathe again after 
the cruel persecution, she founded and endowed a charity by which a 
priest might be supported at Harvington, and another at Buckland ; and 
another charity she similarly originated and secured in favour of Douay 
College. These last benefactions were unhappily engulfed in the new 
wave of confiscation which accompanied the landing and usurpation 
of Dutch William. A well-known and learned priest, the Rev. Silvester 
Jenks, owed his education to her bounty. He was ordained priest in 
1684, afi d on account of his great abilities was called by King James II. 
to London. After the revolution he escaped to Flanders, but returned 
and died in London in 1715. He was appointed to succeed Bishop 
James Smith, Vicar Apostolic of the Northern District, but died before 
his consecration. He was the author of a number of learned and devout 
works. 

During the reign of James II. some of the Catholics had ventured to 
build public chapels, but no sooner had the king taken flight than mobs 
were incited in many parts of the kingdom to destroy these chapels on a 
fixed day, which was afterwards known as " Running Thursday." Among 
others, a mob from Alcester demolished Sir Robert Throckmorton's 
chapel at Coughton ; the Franciscan chapel in Birmingham was burnt, and 
a mob from Kidderminster came to Harvington, and finding the bridge 
over the moat withdrawn, shot through the large oaken doors at Lady 
Yate. As we mentioned, the bullet-hole is still visible. 

" When nobles forced the king to run 

And took away his crown ; 
Then running mobs enjoyed the fun 
Of knocking Popish chapels down." 

At the decease of good Dame Mary Yate, in 1696, her estates passed 
to her granddaughter, Mary, for both her son, Sir Charles, and her 
grandson, Sir John Yate, had died before her. Mary Yate, who was the 
sister and sole heir of Sir John, married Sir Robert Throckmorton of 
Coughton, Bart. Thus Harvington and Buckland passed into the hands 
of the Throckmorton family, in whose possession Harvington still 
remains, though Buckland was alienated but a year ago. And thus 
it is that up to this day the home of the martyred Franciscan has 
ever been in the hands of Catholic owners, and has ever continued to 
shelter a priest to minister to the faithful of the district. 

267 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

It was in 1743 that the new chapel, formed out of the garrets of 
two adjoining cottages standing within the safe enclosure of the moat, was 
opened, with infinite precautions. Special care was taken to secure 
facilities for the escape of the officiating priest to one of the hiding-holes 
within the mansion, in case of the approach of danger. 

This plain and lowly room continued to be used as the chapel until in 
1825 the new church was publicly opened, this time outside the moat. 

Chaddesley Corbet and Harvington have many another tale to tell, 
but we pilgrims could not linger to hear it. We had yet to visit other 
spots consecrated by the memory of the martyr. A couple of miles 
brought us to Rushock, where he had been captured in the house of his 
friend, Mr. Finch, in December 1678. 

There are few lovelier spots in Worcestershire than this orchard- 
covered hill, on which the Manor House and little church of Rushock 
stand. The orchards at the time of our visit seemed literally afire with 
the bright scarlet apples with which the trees were loaded, and the autumn 
tints of the leaves glowed in the October sunshine, as we mounted the 
picturesquely winding lane, set deep in hedgerows, which leads to 
Rushock Court. Of the old house in which the martyr was taken, little 
or nothing remains. There is one old wall in the garden which probably 
formed part of it, and that is all. But the view of the smiling valley 
around remains the same as when he gazed on it for the last time as 
he was hurried off in triumph by his captors. A fair spot, indeed, few 
fairer, perhaps, to be found in all England ! From the hill we gazed 
southward towards Droitwich, and saw at our feet an old farm-house, 
which was to be the next stage of our pilgrimage. A mile or so, 
through winding lanes and grassy fields, would bring us there. But 
before leaving Rushock we must recall to mind these scenes of our 
martyr's life. 

His capture here was really an accident, for the sheriff's officer with 
six or eight men came here in the middle of the night in order to arrest 
a gentleman for debt. Breaking down the doors, they entered a bedroom 
in which they found Father Wall in bed. They soon guessed who he 
was, and they carried him off in triumph. He was first taken before 
Sir John Packington at Westwood Park. This magistrate, though the 
brother of our martyr's noble hostess, committed him to Worcester 
gaol, where he lay imprisoned for five months. 

While in prison he wrote a narrative of his sufferings, which still 
exists, and in which he bears unconscious testimony to the heavenly 
dispositions with which he endured them. He writes : 

" Imprisonment in our times, especially when none can send to his 
friends, nor friends come to him, is the best means to teach us how to 
268 




I-J 
O 

o 

PL, 



u 

h 

^H 

> 
W 

h 
a 



D 5 

0-1 

O 5 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

put our confidence in God alone in all things, and then He will make 
His promise good, ' that all things shall be added to us ' (Luke xii.), 
which chapter, if every one would read and make good use of, a prison 
would be better than a palace, and a confinement for religion and a 
good conscience more pleasant than all the liberties the world could 
afford. As for my own part, God give me His grace, and all faithful 
Christians their prayers ! I am happy enough. We all ought to follow 
the narrow way, though there may be many difficulties in it. It is an 
easy thing to run the blind way of liberty, but God deliver us from all 
broad, sweet ways." 

It was with such thoughts as these stirring in our hearts that we 
threaded our way among the orchards and over the pleasant pasture- 
land to Purshall Hall. 

This fine old house is situated about a mile from the high road 
leading from Kidderminster to Bromsgrove, and is about four miles from 
the latter town. The exterior is not so attractive as that of Harvington 
Hall, and its comparatively modern appearance and large sash windows 
belie its real antiquity. Indeed, there is little to attract one in the front of 
the house, except the fine porch, near the apex of which is seen a large 
stone cross let into the brickwork. It seems to be merely a large farm- 
house shorn of much of its ancient grandeur, and gives no promise of 
the extraordinary treasure that lies concealed within. 

For in very truth, Purshall Hall contains one of the most touching 
shrines that the Catholic pilgrim will find throughout the length and 
breadth of England. From the time of Richard II. down to the 
eighteenth century, it belonged to the family of Purshall, and from 
convert members of that family it passed in the later years of that 
century into the hands of a Catholic priest. And here was provided for 
the little flock a shrine of refuge, where they might worship their God 
in comparative safety, and meet together at dead of night to be 
strengthened with the Bread of Heaven. Though Purshall, Rushock, 
and Badgecourt hard by were, with other centres of Catholicity in North 
Worcestershire, nominally under the charge of the Fathers of the Society 
of Jesus, still it is evident that while our Franciscan martyr lived at 
Harvington, he must often have ministered to the Catholics in these 
places. As we have seen, it was at Rushock that he was captured. 
And at Purshall it was possibly he himself who erected the humble 
altar that we are now about to visit, though this cannot be considered 
certain. Until comparatively recent times, very few peopl-e knew any- 
thing of the existence of this hidden sanctuary. Indeed, it is due to 
our guide that it has become known at all to the outside world, and 
that its priceless value has been realised. And it is in his own words 

269 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

that I should wish to describe what but for him I might never have 
seen at all : 

" If, with the kind permission of the tenant, we ascend the staircase, 
and still further continue our ascent up a rickety flight of stairs, we 
shall see an entrance to what appears to be a lumber-room or large attic 
immediately underneath the roof, with no window or aperture to admit 
the light, and which still enshrines a ruined altar, with the remains of its 
tattered altar-cloth crumbling to dust. The altar-rails and kneeling-bench 
are still almost perfect, preserved to us through the centuries by successive 
occupants of this lonely farm-house, and telling the story most eloquently 
of the midnight meetings of devout worshippers, who, by lonely lanes 
and field-paths, had assembled here to receive the consolations of their 
religion from the hands of the heroic Father Wall. We can picture it 
all, the kneeling worshippers in the upper room, lit with candle or rush 
light, and we can scarcely doubt that this was the scene of his labours, 
for we know that in the month of December 1678, he was arrested at 
Rushock Court, a farm-house about a mile distant, where he had gone to 
spend the night. 

"Who knows the sighs, the tears, the supplications to Heaven, that 
this room has witnessed that again in peace and safety these poor 
Catholics might publicly worship God, and that their priests be no more 
homeless outcasts, and that the privileges of a restoration to their former 
religious liberty might be granted to them ! 

" For more than two hundred years that upper room at Purshall Hall 
has been kept sacred by successive occupants ; no desecrating hand has 
removed its mouldering altar, and to-day it speaks most eloquently of 
the time 

" ' When man pent up his brother men, 
Like brutes within an iron den,' 

and of the noble martyrs who 

" ' Proud of Persecution's rage, 

Their belief with blood have sealed.'"* 

If a non-Catholic could write thus (and all honour to him for these 
moving words !), it may well be imagined with what emotion we Catholic 
pilgrims knelt before this humble altar. To our Rhodes Scholar it was a 
revelation. It brought home to him, as nothing else could have done, 
what a price his English forefathers had had to pay to preserve the Faith 
which he had learnt at his mother's knee. And who could wonder if he 

* John Humphreys, F.L.S , Chaddesley Corbet, a paper read before the Birmingham 
Archaeological Society, December 9, 1903, p. 15. 
270 




s 



ffi 

en 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

knelt there, overcome by the memories of the place, feeling nearer to God, 
perhaps, in this dark garret than in the stateliest cathedral he had ever 
visited ! Indeed, it seemed to us as if we knelt in the Coenaculum itself, 
and it was very sweet to be there. 

There is little, indeed, to describe, for the photograph gives an 
excellent impression of the place. Only, as it had to be taken by flash- 
light, it gives a quite erroneous idea of light. As a matter of fact, the 
place is pitch-dark, and when we visited it, it was only lighted by one 
flickering candle. The altar-stone has been removed, but the hole made 
to receive it in the mensa of the altar-table is still plain to see. 

It seems that there could be no better place than this in which to 
open once again the Acts of the Martyrs, and read by the faint light of 
our taper the last scenes in the life of the Franciscan who by his 
apostolic toil and the generous sacrifice of his blood has hallowed for 
ever this peaceful spot. 

It was on April 25, 1679, that Father Wall was brought to trial 
before Judge Atkins, at the Worcester Assizes. The usual charges were 
brought against him, that he, an English subject, had gone abroad, 
taken Orders in the Church of Rome, returned to England to promulgate 
the doctrines of the said Church, and had refused to take the oath of 
allegiance and supremacy, whereby he was guilty of high treason, under 
the Statute ofay Elizabeth, ch. 2. 

Besides this, there were other counts against him, alleging that he 
had said Mass and heard confessions, that he had reconciled converts 
to the Church, and finally, that he was a Jesuit. 

Only one witness appeared voluntarily against him, and this man, 
named Rogers, was a native of Stonebridge, who, having been repri- 
manded by the martyr for his vicious life, took this opportunity of 
revenge. Dodd says " he became a vagabond, in testimony that heaven 
was not pleased with such kind of sacrifices." 

Three other witnesses were compelled to appear. The condemna- 
tion that followed was a foregone conclusion. On hearing the sentence 
pronounced, the martyr bowed to the judge, and said aloud : " Thanks 
be to God ! God save the King ! And I beseech God to bless your 
lordship and all this honourable bench." 

The judge was moved, and he replied courteously : 

" You have spoken very well. I do not intend that you should 
die, at least, not for the present, till I hear the King's further pleasure." 
It does not appear, however, that he exerted himself to obtain a reprieve. 

The martyr's own account runs as follows : 

" I was not, I thank God for it, troubled with any disturbing thoughts, 
either against the judge for his sentence, or the jury that gave in such a 

271 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

verdict, or against any of the witnesses ; for 1 was then of the same mind, 
as by God's grace 1 ever shall be, esteeming them all as the best friends 
to me, in all they did or said, that ever I had in my life. And I was, I 
thank God, so present with myself, whilst the judge pronounced the 
sentence, that without any concern for anything in the world, I did 
actually at the same time offer myself and the world to God. 

"After the judge was gone from the bench, several Protestant 
gentlemen and others who had heard my trial came to me, though 
strangers, and told me how sorry they were for me. To whom with 
thanks I replied, that I was troubled they should grieve for me or my 
condition, who was joyful for it myself; for I told them I had professed 
this faith and religion all my lifetime, which I was as sure to be true, as 
I was sure of the truth of God's word, on which it was grounded ; and 
therefore in it I deposed my soul, and eternal life and happiness. And 
therefore, should I fear to lose my temporal life for this faith, whereon 
my eternal life depends, I should be worse than an infidel ; and whosoever 
should prefer the life of their bodies before their faith, their religion or 
conscience, they were worse than heathens. For my own part, I told 
them, 1 was ready, by God's grace, to die to-morrow, as I had been to 
receive the sentence of death to-day, and as willing as if I had a grant of 
the greatest dukedom." 

The martyr was sent back to prison, and after some time sent up to 
London, to be examined by Gates and Bedloe and their accomplices, to 
see if it were possible to fix upon him some of the odium raised by their 
pretended plot. Bedloe, he wrote, told him publicly that if he would 
but comply in the matter of religion, he would pawn his life for him, 
and that though condemned, he should not die. This was not the first 
offer of the kind. " But I told them I would not buy my own life at 
so dear a rate, as to wrong my conscience. . . . God's will be done. 
The greater the injury and injustice done against us by men to take 
away our lives, the greater our glory in eternal life before God. This 
is the last persecution that -will be in England : therefore I hope God will give 
all His holy grace to make the best use of it.'" 

Four months elapsed, from the time of Father Wall's condemnation, 
before he was told to make ready for death. When it became known 
that his hour was drawing near, a brother Franciscan, Father William 
Levison, contrived to visit him in prison. He wrote a touching account 
of the interview to his brethren at Douay. 

" Of late I was desired, and willingly went, to visit our friend, . . . 
prisoner at Worcester, whose execution drew near at hand. I came to 
him two days before it, and found him a cheerful sufferer of his present 
imprisonment, and ravished, as it were, with joy, with the future hopes 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

of dying for so good a cause. I found, contrary both to his and my 
expectation, the favour of being with him alone ; and the day before his 
execution I enjoyed that privilege for the space of four or five hours 
together ; during which time I heard his confession and communicated 
him, to his great joy and satisfaction. I ventured likewise, through his 
desire, to be present at his execution, and placed myself boldly next to 
the under-sheriff, near the gallows, where I had the opportunity of giving 
him the last absolution, just as he was turned off the ladder. During 
his imprisonment, he carried himself like a true servant and disciple of 
his crucified Master, thirsting after nothing more than the shedding of 
his blood for the love of his God ; which he performed with a courage 
and cheerfulness becoming a valiant soldier of Christ, to the great edifi- 
fication of all Catholics, and admiration of all Protestants, the rational 
and moderate part especially, who showed a great sense of sorrow for his 
death, decrying the cruelty of putting men to death for priesthood and 
religion. He is the first who ever suffered at Worcester [sic] since the 
Catholic religion entered into this nation, which he seemed with joy to 
tell me before his execution. He was quartered, and his head separated 
from his body, according to his sentence. His body was permitted to 
be buried, and was accompanied by the Catholics of the town to St. Oswald's 
churchyard, where he lies interred. His head I got privately and con- 
veyed it to Mr. Randolph, who will be careful to keep it till opportunity 
serves to transport it to Douay." 

The day of the martyrdom was Friday, August 22, 1679, the Octave 
day of the Assumption of our Blessed Lady. It was a fitting day for so 
devout a client of Mary to enter his heavenly home. 

The place of execution was on Red Hill, overlooking the city of 
Worcester. The exact spot was pointed out to me by the late Mr. 
Robert Berkeley, of Spetchley. It is marked by a pear-tree, standing in 
the garden of a modern house on the summit of the hill, close to the 
roadside. 

A copy of his last speech in MS. is preserved in the library of St. 
Mary's College, Oscott, near Birmingham.* There is also printed: 
A True Copy of the Speech offMr. Francis Johnstons, alias Dot-more, alias Webb, 
alias Wall ; a Priest of the Church of Rome (who was convicted before 

* It is headed : MY LAST SPEACH 

It Please God for my 
RELIGION. 

At his execution, he said : "I would have said more, but that I gave my speech to a 
friend to be printed." The " Animadversions" at the end of the printed copy referred to 
above are very bitter. "And thus this Popish Faction design to delude the world by 
pretending that they die only as Martyrs for their Religion," &c. &c. 

2M 273 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Mr. Justice Atkins, at Worcester, last Lent-Assizes, upon an Indictment on the 
Statute 27 Eliz. cap. l). Which he spake upon the Ladder immediately before 
his Execution, on Fryday last, August 22, 1679 : with Animadversions upon the 



same." 



It should be noted that though these two versions agree in substance, 
they differ widely in phraseology, and the advantage lies evidently with 
the manuscript copy, which is no doubt transcribed from the martyr's 
own autograph, for he composed the speech in prison shortly before his 
execution. 

It will be sufficient here to quote his last words : 

" I will offer my life in satisfaction for my sins, and for the Catholick 
cause : and I beg for those that be my enemies in this my death, 
and I desire to have them forgiven, because I go to that World of 
Happiness sooner than I should have gone. And humbly beg pardon 
from God and the world, and this I beg for the merits and mercy of 
Jesus Christ. 

" I beseech God to bless his Majesty, and give him a long Life and 
happy reign in this World and in the World to come. 

" I beseech God to bless all my Benefactors and all my Friends, and 
those that may have been any way under my charge " (and here his 
thoughts must have dwelt tenderly on his beloved flock at Harvington), 
"and I beseech God to bless all the Catholicks and this Nation. 

" I beseech God to bless all that suffer under this Persecution and to 
turn our Captivity into Joy : that they that Sow in tears may reap in 

Jy-" 

***** 

As we left the darkness of that hidden sanctuary, carrying in our 
hearts a memory that would never fade, we found the old hall flooded 
in the golden light of an October sunset. And with the glory of the 
dying day there seemed to fall upon our hearts some foretaste of that 
peace which passeth all understanding, that peace which God has promised 
unto those who love Him to the end. 

"The golden evening brightens in the west. 
Soon, soon to faithful warriors comes their rest : 
Sweet is the calm of Paradise the blest." 

And is not the martyr's last prayer being fulfilled before our very 
eyes ? Truly, "they that sow in tears shall reap in joy." 

* 

We had yet one more place to visit before our pilgrimage was done 
On our way through the fields to Purshall Hall, we had noted on our 

274 




MONUMENT IN MEMORY OF VENERABLE 
JOHN WALL, O.F.M., IN THE CATHOLIC 
CHURCHYARD, HARVINGTON. Photo by the 
author 



To face page 274 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

right an imposing Elizabethan house, not a quarter of a mile away. This 
was Badge Court, once the seat of the Wintour family, notorious for 
their connection with the Gunpowder Plot. It is not, however, in con- 
nection with this unhappy plot that our interest in Badge Court lies. In 
Father Wall's time it was the home of a devout and faithful lady, who 
had in her youth passed through the deep waters of sorrow, and now 
found her consolation in works of charity and devotion. Mistress 
Helen Wintour was daughter of Robert W r intour, of Huddington, who 
was executed in London for his share in the plot. Her mother was 
Gertrude, daughter of Sir John Talbot of Grarton. Doubtless in her 
hidden, solitary life she found her chief consolation in her visits 
to the chapel, and in ministering to the priests who came from time 
to time to seek refuge beneath her roof. Her days were largely 
spent in embroidering church vestments, and some most gorgeous 
and elaborate specimens of her skill have, happily, come down to us. 
It is with almost a shock of contrast that we realise that the splendid 
Wintour vestments, now preserved among the chief treasures of Stony- 
hurst College, were made for and were first used in such a poor and 
humble sanctuary as that we had just visited. But Helen Wintour knew 
that what makes the temple glorious is the presence of the King, and 
that the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass was not less worthy of honour when 
celebrated at dead of night in a garret, than when offered on the High 
Altar of St. Peter's Basilica by the Vicar of Christ himself. And so in 
most striking contrast to their surroundings, the holy priests who said 
Mass at Purshall or Badge Court were clad in vestments exceeding 
magnifical, stiff" with gold embroidery, and covered with pearls. 

The chasuble and cope of Pentecostal red are profusely adorned with 
cloven tongues of gold, while below we find the Wintour arms (a falcon 
alighting upon a tower), and the legend, Orate pro me Helena de Wintour. 

The white vestments, embroidered with tulips and other flowers in 
richest colours, bear a representation of angels adoring the Lamb of God, 
and in the adornment of the two sets of vestments there are used no 
fewer than four hundred and seventy-one large pearls. Another chasuble 
is worked with pomegranates in silver and gold. 

This devotion to the material beauty of divine worship is indeed no 
unfrequent phenomenon throughout the days of persecution. In spite 
of the daily peril of robbery and confiscation, devout Catholics were 
never tired of making rich offerings to the sanctuary ; and, indeed, it was 
fitting that the " golden priests " of that period of martyrdom should be 
vested in the richest sacrificial robes. 

The waning light warned us that we must lose no time in visiting 
the interior of this old Catholic house. 

275 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The moat is mostly filled up, and the modern front of timber and 
lath and plaster which marks the venerable fabric does not prepare one 
for the interest of the interior. There is a wealth of carved oak panelling 
of the richest kind, both in the hall and the reception-rooms below, and 
in the best bedroom above. The hall is noticeable for a magnificent 
representation of the Wintour arms, emblazoned on the ceiling, with a 
proud array of quarterings, among which we recognise the bearings of 
the Talbots, the Staffords, the Huddingtons, and many others. The 
great shield is surmounted with the Wintour crest, a falcon surrounded 
by a coronet. A second escutcheon of the Wintour arms, splendidly 
carved in oak, is displayed over the dining-room mantelpiece. One of 
the most interesting features of the house is a set of encaustic tiles 
surrounding the fireplace of the best bedroom. These tiles are 
enamelled with the arms of the Wintours and their various alliances, 
among them being the hound of the Talbots, surrounded with the words, 
"Sir John Talbot." 

This Sir John succeeded to the Talbot estates in 1529, and was, as 
we have seen, the maternal grandfather of Mistress Helen Wintour. 
W T e had already seen his tomb at Bromsgrove Church. The tiles may 
therefore suggest the probable date when Badge Court was built. 

All these features were pointed out to us by our learned guide, who 
had made a special study of this part of North Worcestershire, and in 
particular of its Catholic associations. It is to him we owe very much of 
the information contained in these pages. 

The Wintour vestments were left by Mistress Helen to the Jesuit 
Mission in Worcestershire (or to the " College of St. George," as it was 
called), with the stipulation that they should not be sent for safety 
beyond the seas, lest they should never return. In 1854 they were 
transferred from Grafton to Stonyhurst College, save for the chasuble 
embroidered with pomegranates, which is still in possession of the Jesuit 
Fathers at Worcester. 

As we wended our way home in the twilight we talked of the 
wondrous change that has come upon England with the blossoming of 
the Second Spring. We marked how the first dawning of a brighter 
day synchronised so strangely with the agony of the Church of France 
during the Great Revolution. In 1791 a Bill passed the British Parlia- 
ment tolerating the schools and religious worship of Catholics, and 
repealing certain of the most cruel statutes still in force against them. 
Almost immediately we find John Baynham of Purshall Hall, Richard 
Cornthwaite of Harvington Hall, and Andrew Robinson of Grafton 
Manor, together with other Worcestershire priests, subscribing certifi- 
cates that they had set apart rooms in their respective houses for Catholic 
276 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

worship. In 1829 came Catholic Emancipation, and then only did our 
fathers begin to breathe freely. From 1558 they had endured the long 
agony of a cruel persecution, but now at last the night began to pass 
away, and joy came in the morning. In 1850 the restoration of the 
Catholic hierarchy was, as it were, the harbinger of the Second Spring. 
Then John Henry Newman arose amid the Fathers of the First Council 
of Westminster, to hail, in deathless accents, its coming, and as that 
august assembly listened to his words, tears fell fast from their eyes, 
sweet tears of thankful joy. " And they sung together hymns and praise 
to the Lord : because He is good, for His mercy endureth for ever 
towards Israel." 



Since the above record of our pilgrimage to Purshall was written, facts 
have been brought to my notice by Mr. R. H. Murray, of Worcester, 
which throw great doubt on the theory that would connect our Franciscan 
martyr with the secret chapel at Purshall Hall. 

Mr. Murray is an expert on old woodwork and furniture, and in 
particular on ancient Communion Tables. He has convinced himself 
(and after a second visit to Purshall, made in his company, he has con- 
vinced me) that the old altar and rails were originally a Lord's Table 
and Communion-rails put up in some Anglican church in the time of 
Archbishop Laud. As the annexed plan (which we owe to his kindness) 
clearly shows, the table itself has been somewhat clumsily altered to suit 
its new purpose. 

It is clearly a Laudian table, not an Elizabethan one, for the latter 
were made after the same pattern on all sides, whereas this is evidently made 
to stand against a wall. Only the front legs are turned, at the back are mere 
plain supports. The original size of the table is shown clearly by the old 
rail, which has not been lengthened, and by the old nail-holes and other 
marks still remaining. The present top is of deal, two feet longer and 
twelve inches wider than the original one. The tattered piece of printed 
calico which partly covers the table has tack-holes all round, which also 
show the original size of the top. One of the present supports at the 
back of the table is carved on one side, and resembles other pieces of 
carving still to be seen about the house. 

The balusters are of a pattern of which other examples may still be 
found in churches where the old arrangements have not been disturbed 
nor replaced by modern fittings from the Church-furniture shop. They 
are of oak, but have at one period been coloured green. The rails in 
front have their proper sill, but the side rails are held at the base by two 

277 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

strips of wood. The top rail is perfect all round, but the pillars at the 
angles have disappeared and been replaced by a baluster sawn in two. 

The kneeling is of English soft wood, and is almost all worn away 
with dry-rot. The original kneeling was probably of stone, when the 
whole thing was in a church. 

The table has been converted into an altar not merely by enlarge- 



^fmer 




rwi/iJ TA|>] /rame i'-^V i'y' 3 o ., 
now it is s 8'* 2 7' - 3 s' 
' " 



/u. 



d J)Ulj Ue i-i- , 
2 9x fitak - 




ment. In the centre of the new top a hole has been made for the 
consecrated altar-slab. 

The history of this converted Communion Table is not certain. It 
will be remembered that Archbishop Laud ordered the Communion 
Tables to be fixed at the east end of the chancels, altar-wise, and railed 
round, to preserve them from desecration. Up to his time the tables 
were usually kept in the chancels, but at the time of the administration 
of the Lord's Supper they were moved down into the nave, and put 
lengthways, the minister standing in the middle of the north side, facing 
south. (The ends faced east and west.) 

The tables in Elizabethan days were made like other tables that have 
to stand in the centre of a room ; it was only in or after Laud's time 
that the carving was often omitted at the back, where it would not be 
seen against the wall. 

Now it appears that the Purshalls of Purshall Hall were not Catholics 
in the seventeenth century. Edmund Purshall, who died in 1650, 
278 




D 

PH 

-T 



CJ 



u 



A FRANCISCAN APOSTLE 

aged 96, was churchwarden of Elmbridge (his parish church) in 1622, 
and in all probability till he died. He was buried in Elmbridge Church, 
May 21, 1650. 

Two children of John Purshall (Edmund's great-grandson) were 
baptized at Elmbridge Jonathan in 1696, and Elizabeth in 1699. (The 
said John Purshall was married in the same church in 1694.) This does 
not look as if they were Catholics at the time, especially as the note, " a 
Catholick," is appended to certain names in the register, but not to 
theirs. Catholics had, of course, to be buried in Protestant churches, 
and even their baptisms were often registered there. 

It seems probable, then, that the Table and Communion-rails in 
question were fixed in Elmbridge Church during the height of Laud's 
power, and that when the " Ordinance of Lords and Commons " was 
passed in 1643, ordering all chancel floors to be reduced to their former 
level and all rails removed, Edmund Purshall, as churchwarden, removed 
the table and rails to his own house. It is possible that during the 
Commonwealth, when the Prayer-Book service was proscribed, and the 
" Directory " took its place, that he and his family and friends may have 
used the secret chapel in the roof for the Anglican form of worship. 

Be that as it may, the chapel certainly became Catholic in 1750, 
when the estate was purchased by the Rev. John Baynham, S.J., and the 
mission of Badge Court was transferred to Purshall. Father Baynham 
also served Grafton Manor, near Bromsgrove, the seat of the Talbots. 

It was probably he who transformed the old Anglican Communion 
Table into a Catholic altar. He may have received the last Purshall of 
Purshall Hall into the Church, but of that we cannot be certain. Unless 
the Purshalls had become Catholics, Father Baynham could hardly have 
acquired the property. 

He registered the place as a chapel for Catholic service in 1791, 
according to the terms of the first Catholic Relief Act, but no doubt he 
used, after the need of secrecy was gone, a larger and more commodious 
chapel. 

Father Baynham died February 24, 1796. He left his property, 
says Foley,* to a Mr. William Collins, whose first wife was the Father's 
niece, on condition that if he had no children the property should devolve 
to the Church. (As an ex-Jesuit, he had, of course, the right to dispose 
of his property as he wished.) " St. Mary's College, Oscott, and various 
missions of the diocese of Birmingham are indebted to this good Father 
for the enjoyment of his real and personal estate, Mr. Collins having 
died childless." 

It also appears from more careful inspection, that there was originally 

* Records, vol. v. p. 854. 

279 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

a small window in the chapel, to the right of the altar. It has been 
blocked up with bricks, at what date does not appear, but probably not 
more than a century ago. It is seen from the back of the house, but is 
almost hidden behind the great chimney-stack. This window is very 
small, but there may possibly have been light in the roof, as the present 
roof is new. If not, the chapel must always have been very dark, 
though not pitch-dark, as it now is. 

These facts, though they throw doubt on our martyr's connection 
with the chapel, make it of great and unique interest. I do not know 
of any other instance of an Anglican Communion Table being converted 
during the penal days into a Catholic altar. 



280 




s 

, 

65 



j -ai 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

ONE of the most touching figures in the glorious roll of the 
martyrs of England is undoubtedly that of the old priest, the 
Venerable Nicholas Postgate, D.D.,who laid down his life at 
York, at the patriarchal age of eighty-two. His memory is 
held in singular veneration to this day, even among non-Catholics. 
The great work he accomplished for souls, during his long and laborious 
ministry, still bears abundant fruit amid those wild moors which cover 
the north-east portion of Yorkshire, and there are few of our martyrs 
about whom so many traditions still exist among the people. This is, 
of course, partly because he was one of the latest of the martyrs, having 
suffered at York on August 7, 1679. But of other contemporary victims 
of this persecution very little is known, and it is evident that Father 
Postgate, by the sanctity and simplicity of his life, and the pathetic 
circumstances of his cruel death at so advanced an age, made an 
impression upon the minds of his generation which is all but unique, 
and left a memory behind him which the lapse of more than two 
centuries has failed to efface. 

Nicholas Postgate was born at Kirkdale House, in the parish of 
Egton, near Whitby, in the North Riding of Yorkshire. His father 
was apparently the son of William Postgate of Kirkdale, and his 
mother, Jane, was living there a widow in 1604. His father's mother 
was by birth a Watson, a name which the martyr assumed while 
working on the mission. His widowed mother was returned as a 
Recusant in 1604. " Jane Postgate doth keep in her house William 
Postgate, her father, a Recusant who teacheth children, and also 
Marmaduke Petch and Jane Smallwood, Recusants." * It was further 
stated that she had been a Recusant for at least eight years past, and 
of late years had had children baptized privately. The future martyr 
was no doubt one of these children, baptized by some Catholic priest, 
who at the risk of his life ministered to the faithful of the district. 
There were many Catholics in these inaccessible parts of Yorkshire, and 
more than sixty Recusants were returned from Egton parish in 1604. 
Of these, about twenty had become Recusants since Lady Day, 1603, 
which shows that zealous priests were at work in the district. This is 
indeed an instance of what was going on all over England when the 
death of Queen Elizabeth and the accession of the son of Mary Stuart 
gave new hopes to the persecuted Catholics, and were the immediate 
occasion of a great increase among professed Recusants. 

* Peacock's Yorkshire Catholics, p. 97. 
2 N 28l 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The martyr's parents were great sufferers for their Faith. Their 
relatives were also Catholics, for we find " George Postgate and Isabel, 
his wife," "William Postgate, the younger," and " Katheren Jeffrason," 
their servant, presented as Recusants, belonging to Eskdale Chapelry ; 
and they are reported to have had three children privately baptized 
From Ugglebarnby Chapelry in the same year were presented as 
Recusants for the past eight years, James Postgate, Margery, his wife, 
and two members of their household. It is further stated that James 
and Margery " were not marryed at the church, but secretly not known 
where," and also that their children were " none of them baptized at 
church, but privately.'' 

Kirkdale, or Kirk House, our martyr's birthplace, stood near Egton 
Bridge. A writer describes it in the year 1838 as "now literally a 
cattle-shed." It must have been but a poor cottage, in spite of its 
high-sounding name. 

In 1621 Nicholas was sent abroad, to be educated for the priesthood, 
and was admitted to the famous college at Douay on July II. He was 
already a man, and so he became a convictor, not an ordinary student. 
It was the custom of those days for the students to take another name, 
since it was a penal offence for Catholics to be educated abroad, and if 
known by their names they might bring trouble upon their parents at 
home. Nicholas accordingly took the name of Whitmore. In later 
years, as we have seen, he sometimes used the alias of Watson. 

He was ordained priest March 20, 1628, and sang his first Mass on 
April i, at which date he must have been about thirty years old. We 
do not know why he began his ecclesiastical studies so late. He was 
sent to the mission in his native country on the feast of SS. Peter and 
Paul, June 29, 1630. 

And now began a long ministry of nearly fifty years, in which he 
laboured with such devoted zeal that he is said to have reconciled near a 
thousand persons to the faith of their ancestors. The diary of his 
college records the extraordinary reputation he has gained there for 
piety and zeal, and this reputation was not belied by his subsequent 
career. 

At first he made his home at Saxton, with the Hungate family, who 
were devout Catholics and loyalists. Sir William Hungate, knight, 
married Jane, daughter of George Middleton of Leighton, County 

* A Ralph Postgate, born in Oxfordshire in 1648, was ordained priest in 1674, 
became a Jesuit, and was subsequently twice rector of the English College, Rome. He 
was the son of William Postgate and Joanna Mylott, both Catholics, and, like the martyr, 
was educated at Douay. He died at Rome in 1718. It is not known if he were a 
relative of the Yorkshire Postgates (Foley, vol. v. p. 757). 
282 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

Lancaster, and he died without issue in 1634. Father Postgate lived o 
with his widow until her death, about 1638. 

Saxton is near Tadcaster in the West Riding of Yorkshire. The 
famous battle of Towton, in the Wars of the Roses, was fought close to 
the village. After leaving Saxton our martyr became chaplain to " the 
old Lady Dunbar." She was the widow of the first Viscount Dunbar, 
Sir Henry Constable of Burton Constable, the head of a well-known 
Yorkshire Catholic family : he was created Viscount in 1620, and died 
in 1645. 

Subsequently the martyr served Kilvington Castle and Hall (the 
seat of the Saltmarsh and Meynell families) and other places widely 
apart. Kilvington is a little north of Thirsk, near the Hambleton 
Hills. Thomas Meynell of Kilvington was born in 1564, and for four 
years, from 1600 to 1604, was imprisoned for the Faith, first at Hull, 
and then in York Castle. A Mrs. Meynell of Kilvington, probably 
his son's wife, was among the martyr's visitors in prison, as we shall 
hear. 

But the martyr's chief abode was a thatched cottage at Ugthorpe, 
two miles from Mulgrave Castle, and about five from Whitby, in the 
midst of a wild moor known as Cleveland Blackamoor. Here he lived 
as poor among the poor, conforming himself in dress, diet and lodging 
to the flock which he zealously tended. 

Thomas Ward, the well-known controversialist, who was born and 
lived at Danby Castle, some seven miles from Father Postgate's 
hermitage at Ugthorpe, knew our martyr intimately. He has paid him 
a tribute of love and admiration in the fourth canto of his Hudibrastic 
poem, " England's Reformation." After describing the Gates plot and 
recounting the faith of the Catholics who suffered from that orgy of 
p'anic and fanaticism, he continues : 

" Nor spar'd they Father Posket's blood, 
A reverend priest, devout and good, 
Whose spotless life, in length was spun, 
To eighty years and three times one. 
Sweet his behaviour, grave his speech, 
He did by good example teach ; 
His love right bent, his will resigned, 
Serene his look, and calm his mind ; 
His sanctity to that degree, 
As angels live, so lived he. 

" A thatched cottage was his cell, 
Where this contemplative did dwell ; 
Two miles from Mulgrave Castle 't stood, 
Sheltered by snowdrifts, not by wood; 

283 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Tho' there he lived to that great age, 
It was a dismal hermitage ; 
But God placed there the saint's abode, 
For Blackamoor's far greater good. 

"The holy lives of those bless'd saints should I 
Presume to write, and had a thought could fly 
Beyond the limits of the vaulted sky, 
Yet would my verse ten thousand times fall short 
Of their due praise. Let angels in consort 
Sing forth their virtues on celestial lyres ; 
They are exalted to these peaceful choirs. 
Stop, then, my pen, and to this period come : 
God saw them worthy ofmartyrticm." 

Father Postgate had another retreat in his own native parish of 
Egton, about four miles away. Here he would often come to celebrate 
the Divine Mysteries in a small dark loft, which is to be one of the 
shrines of this pilgrimage. His devoted labours were felt all over the 
surrounding country. Egton, Sleights, Whitby, Pickering, all were 
scenes of his apostolate. Though he lived in such utter poverty, 
deprived of all comforts, he was yet a man of gentle nurture and refine- 
ment, a Doctor of Divinity, possessed of no mean literary attainments, 
and no small practical talent. The touching hymn which he composed, 
it is said, in his dungeon in York Castle, is a proof of this. 

The old man would probably have gone to his grave in peace, had 
not the popular mind been driven into frenzy by the supposed discoveries 
of the so-called Popish plot. " These falsehoods," says Peacock, " stimu~ 
lated the persecuting zeal, not only of those misguided people who sincerely 
thought that they did God service by hunting Catholic priests to death, 
but also of every unprincipled ruffian who did not shrink from swearing 
away a man's life for a reward." 

Thus we find that beside the immediate victims of the infamous 
informers Dates and Bedloe and their crew priests were at this period 
hunted out and done to death all over the country ; not indeed that they 
were accused of having had any share in the pretended plot, but merely 
for their faith and priesthood. Thus at Cardiff, Ruthin, Worcester, 
Hereford, York, and other places, innocent servants of God were put to 
death amid scenes of atrocious ferocity, for the sole offence that, having 
been ordained Catholic priests by the authority of the Holy See, they 
had dared to return to their country, and remain in it for more than forty 
days, in order to minister to souls. 

On December 8, 1678, our martyr was called to baptize a child at the 
house of one Matthew Lyth at Ugglebarnby, a village some miles from 
Whitby in the valley of the Little Beck. While he was in the house he 
284 



I 





A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

was apprehended by an exciseman, named John Reeves, an implacable 
enemy of Catholics, who hoped to gain the reward of twenty pounds 
promised to such informers. He associated with himself in this piece 
of villainy one Henry Cockerell. 

The house in which the martyr was taken is said to be still standing. 
It is called Redbarns, and I much regret that I was not able to visit it. 
LJgglebarnby, it may be noted, is about three miles from Sleights, the 
station next to Whitby on the line from Pickering. It is at Sleights that 
the Little Beck, a stream that takes its rise in the high moorland of 
Sneaton, flows into the river Esk. 

The old man was carried off to Brompton (a place between Pickering 
and Scarborough, some twenty miles south of Sleights as the crow flies) 
to be examined by Sir William Cayley, the resident justice of the peace. 
Canon Raine, in his York Castle Depositions, has printed the official record 
of the examination which took place on December 9, before Sir William 
Cayley and his son, William Cayley, Esquire, Junior. 

"John Reeves, his Majesty's surveyor or gauger for the town of 
Whitby, saith that upon the yth instant he was informed that Matthew 
Lith of Sleights, being at a wedding, should speak these words : ' You 
talk of Papists and Protestants ; but, when the roast is ready, I know 
who shall have the first cut.' 

" Upon notice whereof this informer thought himself obliged to search 
the said Matthew's house, which accordingly he did upon the 8th instant, 
supposing that some arms or ammunition might be found there, the said 
Matthew and his family being all Papists. And he saith that though he 
was interrupted by the said Matthew, he did find a supposed Popish priest 
there (called Postgate), and also Popish books, relics, wafers, and several 
other things, all which the said Postgate owned to be his. The said 
Postgate said that he was called Watson, but afterwards being called by 
others by the name of Postgate, he owned that to be his right name. 

" Nicholas Postgate, about the age of fourscore years, saith that about 
forty years since be lived at Saxton, with the Lady Hungate, until she 
died. And since then he hath lived with the old Lady Dunbar, but how 
long it is since, he knoweth not. Of late he hath had no certain residence, 
but hath travelled about among his friends. Being demanded whether 
he be a Popish priest or no, he saith, ' Let them prove it,' and would give 
no other direct answer. Being demanded how he came by, and what use 
he made of the books, wafers, and other things that were found with him 
and which he owned, he saith that some were given him by Mr. Goodricke, 
a Roman Catholic, and other some by one Mr. Jowsie, a supposed Romish 
priest, both which are dead ; and that he made use of them by disposing 
them to several persons who desired them for helping their infirmities. 

285 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Being demanded why he named himself at the first Watson, he saith that 
he hath been sometimes so called, his grandmother on the father's side 
being so called, and he being like that kindred." 

It will be observed that the venerable priest took good care to name 
no one, except those who were already dead, and out of the power of the 
persecutors. On the same day, December 9, 1678, Andrew Jowsie of 
Egton was charged with being a priest, before Edward Trotter and 
Constable Bradshaw, Esquires, justices of the peace. He denied the fact, 
but refused to take the oaths of allegiance and supremacy. He was 
acquitted. He cannot have been the Mr. Jowsie to whom the martyr 
referred, but was no doubt a relative. From Brompton the venerable 
confessor was carried off to York, no doubt via Rillington and Malton. 

He was placed at the bar at the York Assizes, and indicted for high 
treason, not as connected with the plot, of which he was obviously 
innocent, but, under the old penal Statute of 27 Elizabeth, for being a 
Catholic priest. Three witnesses appeared against him : Elizabeth 
Wood, Elizabeth Baxter, and Richard Morris. These deposed that 
they had seen the old man baptize, and exercise other priestly functions. 
Upon their evidence he was convicted and condemned to death, a sentence 
by no means unwelcome to one who had all his lifetime been learning to 
die. The trial seems to have been conducted with more than the usual 
want of humanity and even of justice. 

An old account says : 

" The Judge, like a scarletted huntsman, cheered on the pack, and 
their feeble prey was run down by acclamation. He stood like a victim 
bound to the altar, and never lost his composure except once, while 
hearing the evidence of one of his own converts, one to whom his chari- 
table hand had often been extended, but who now witnessed against him. 
His lips then quivered for a moment, and his eyes shed tears, for who 
can withstand the force of ingratitude ? His simple statement in his 
own defence did but vex his persecutors the mere, for they were bent 
upon his destruction, and by outrageous clamour they silenced a witness 
who had ventured to speak in his behalf. All the evidence of his guilt 
was that he had baptized a child in the Catholic faith : its mother 
testified this truth ! . . . 

" Whilst there remained a hope of his acquittal for what human 
being could be thought so fiendish as to condemn him ? the old Father 
felt a desire for justification ; but no sooner was all hope denied by the 
verdict of the jury, than he resigned himself to his fate. It seemed a 
voice calling him to heaven, and he thanked God. The lawyers left the 
court and went to glory in their triumph over a bottle of wine, while 
the poor prisoner was conducted back to his cell. He was visited by 
286 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

the woman whose testimony had been most material ; she came with 
remorseful tears to beg his pardon ; he blessed her and gave her money 
to bear her expenses home money that had been given him to provide 
comforts with, in this, his hour of need." * 

"The day allotted for his triumphant exit," continues another old 
account, "was the yth of August, 1679 ; on which day in the morning, 
amongst other visitors, went to see 
him, Mrs. Fairfax, wife to Mr. 
Charles Fairfax of York, and Mrs. 
Meynell of Kilvington. These 
ladies having done their devotions, 
went together to his room to take 
their last leave of him, and to crave 
his blessing. 

" The confessor seeing them 
in great concern, whereas he was 
cheerful, came up to them, and 
laying his right hand upon the 
one, and his left upon the other, 
said : ' Be of good heart, children, 
you shall both be delivered of 
sons, and they will both be saved.' 
Immediately after, he was laid upon 
a sledge, and drawn through the 
streets to the place of execution, 
where he suffered with great con- 
stancy. The two ladies soon after- 
wards gave birth to sons, who were both baptized and both died in 
their infancy. Thus the prophecy was fulfilled." This was told to Mr. 
Knaresborough, the martyr's biographer, by Mrs. Fairfax herself, in 
1705. _ 

His dying speech is still preserved. He said but little, the substance 
of his words being as follows: "I die in the Catholic religion, out 
of which there is no salvation. Mr. Sheriff, you know that I die not 
for the plot, but for my religion. Be pleased, Mr. Sheriff, to acquaint 
his Majesty that I never offended him in any manner of way. I pray 
God give him His grace and the light of truth. I forgive all who have 
wronged me, and brought me to this death, and I desire forgiveness of 
all people." 

The unhappy man who had apprehended him never had the reward 
which he looked for, but, after having suffered for some time an extreme 
* CathoKc Magazine, A.D. 1838, p. 300. 

287 




bone Crucifix 
which he wore d Kij- 
nwfyrdom . 

(<tf AnpJeibrtK Abbey.J 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

torture in body and mind, was found drowned in the Little Beck, the 
stream we have already mentioned, which flows by Ugglebarnby to empty 
itself into the Esk at Sleights. The place where the informer was found 
" a pool hollowed out by the concussion of a mountain cataract," is 
still .pointed out, and it bears the significant name of " the Devil's Hole," 
or "the Devil's Dump." The country people declare that no fish are 
ever caught there, and they believe it to be still an accursed spot. The 
good old priest at Egton Bridge told the present writer that a colleague 
of his had desired to test the truth of the tradition, and had fished the 
Devil's Hole for a whole day, but without seeing a single fish rise. It 
is indeed a weird, uncanny spot. The continual hiss of the cataract 
seems to sound the knell of the wretch who there perished in his 
despair. 

A pilgrimage to the places sanctified by the labours of the dear old 
martyr is an extremely interesting one, and the wild romantic scenery of 
the Cleveland moors greatly adds to the attraction, for one who is a 
lover of nature. The wooded glens which descend from the moors 
inland are often of great beauty, and the exhilarating air of sea and 
moorland is delightfully invigorating. Many of the scattered farms 
are inhabited by faithful Catholics, who have lived in their old home- 
steads for generation after generation, clinging to their holy Faith with 
admirable tenacity. 

Thus it is no small pleasure to the pilgrim to visit a spot so blessed 
by God. And owing to the kind co-operation of Catholic residents in 
the neighbourhood, we have been able to gather together many an 
interesting tradition. On a fine summer afternoon we drove out from 
Whitby northward, along the coast, until at the picturesque seaside 
hamlet of Sandsend with its cottages perched up on either side of the 
ravine through which runs a little rippling beck we turned inland and, 
leaving on our left the wooded park of Mulgrave Castle, soon arrived 
at Lyth Church. It was curious to see the trees stunted and warped in 
their growth by the force of the strong sea-winds, and the old church 
seemed as if it too had felt the buffeting of the tempests, for it was 
propped up by as strange and massive a series of buttresses as it has 
been our fortune to meet with. Within, " restoration " of the most 
drastic kind had worked more harm than ever storms could do, and had 
left nothing of interest remaining. 

And now, by rough steep roads, through numerous gates,, we 
approached Ugthorpe, which was for many years the home of the dear 
old martyr, Father Nicholas Postgate. The village stands on the brow 
of a hill, one long straggling street if street it can be called with a 
new Protestant church, built as if in protest against the far more 
288 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

imposing Catholic one, which claims the allegiance of the majority of the 
inhabitants of the district. It is indeed cheering to see that the Faith 
has not died out in Ugthorpe. How could it, indeed, when it was 
watered by a martyr's blood ? Foley speaks of the " extraordinary 
religious fervour which still exists in the district." The presbytery is 
of unusual size and spaciousness, which is explained by the fact that the 
late priest, " Mr. Rigby," had started there a secondary school. 

This priest, from all accounts, was one of the old school of " Garden- 
of-the-Soul Catholics " : a fine old school it was ! formed in the tradi- 
tions which had been handed down by the martyrs, of solid, genuineEnglish 
piety, not so demonstrative in outward expression of devotion as is the 
custom nowadays, rough and uncouth perhaps to modern notions, but 
sterling, true and faithful, through evil report and good. Many years 
he had ruled his Ugthorpe flock, and every day after Mass he would 
recite with them the beautiful and touching hymn which tradition has 
handed down as "Father Postgate's hymn." Whether it were really 
composed by the old martyr or not does not seem certain, but it is at 
any rate attributed to him and no doubt was constantly recited by him. 
The tune to which it is sung is also traditional. Our readers may like 
to have it.* At Catholic funerals in this district it was also the custom 
to sing the hymn. It was begun as the corpse was carried across 
the threshold of the house, and was given out two lines at a time by 
an old Catholic of the place, John Gallon, who then raised the tune, 
and the people sang it as the funeral procession went on towards the 
church. It is unfortunate that in late years this pious custom should 
have been dropped. 

Father Rigby, it may be added, was a physician of bodies as well as 
of souls. He worked miracles in the way of removing the bigoted 
prejudices of Protestants by means of his "Black Bottles, White Bottles, 
Pills for human beings, Pills for Turkeys to prevent their feathers 
falling off," and other remedies for man and beast. Once, indeed, to 
his high glee, the Protestant parson, having been taken ill in the night, 
was obliged to send for him, as no doctor could be got. " I did what 
I could tor him, poor man ! " said he, with a sort of pitying contempt, 
very characteristic, but indescribable. His powerful and eloquent 
sermons completed the good work begun by his remedies. Up to his 
advent, the Protestant feeling had been very bitter, and Catholics were 
afraid even to speak of their religion before outsiders. No doubt it 
was in this way that so many of the precious traditions of the penal 
days were lost. The faithful feared to be overheard by their bigoted 
neighbours, and thus expose themselves to being tabooed and persecuted. 

* See p. 303. 
20 28Q 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Peace be to the memory of the aged priest who did so much to over- 
come this bitterness ! 

It was disappointing to find no certain relics of the martyr in the 
present beautiful church at Ugthorpe. However, in the sacristy we 
were shown two old chalices, both of which, probably, and one of which 
was certainly used by him. They are figured in a paper, printed in the 
Archaeological Journal (vol. Ixi., No. 241), by Mr. T. M. Fallow, F.S.A., 
on "Yorkshire Plate and Goldsmiths." 

Mr. Fallow says : " Both these chalices are interesting as having 
been those ordinarily used by the well-known Nicholas Postgate, who 
at the age of eighty-two was barbarously hanged at York, in 1679, for 
saying Mass." The smaller, and apparently the older chalice is a silver 
one of Gothic design, with wavy flames round the bowl. It is pro- 
nounced by Mr. Fallow to be of French origin. (A very similar one is 
shown as a "Persecution Chalice" in the Museum of St. Mary's 
College, Oscott.) It unscrews in three places for the purpose of being 
carried about. This chalice seems certainly to have been used by the 
martyr. The other chalice is somewhat taller. " It is probably English, 
as it corresponds with similar chalices having English marks elsewhere." 
Mr. Fallow gives its date as c. 1630. It has a Gothic knob (pierced). On 
the foot, below a crucifix, is engraved the inscription Ora pro D.M.F. 

It would be very interesting to identify the donor of this chalice. 
May it have been Mrs. Charles Fairfax of York, who was so great a 
friend of our martyr ? However that may be, this chalice belonged at 
one time to Bishop Matthew Gibson, Vicar Apostolic of the Northern 
District and founder of Ushaw College, who resided, from time to time, 
in a house opposite the present Catholic Church at Ugthorpe. 

In a hollow below the hill on which the village stands, lies Ugthorpe 
Old Hall, which was for many generations the seat of the RadclifFes, a 
Catholic family which suffered much for the Faith. They were formerly 
owners of Mulgrave Castle, but their adherence to the old religion cost 
them this estate and many other broad lands as well. The house, now 
fallen from its ancient dignity, is still interesting. 

It is of Tudor date, with mullioned windows, and there are some 
curiously carved stones built into the walls. The oak door, at which 
our martyr must often have entered, still exists with its quaint old 
knocker and latch. In an out-building to the left of the Hall, which 
is now used as a cow-byre, there is a curious priests' hiding-place made 
in a chimney. The Radcliffes were among the staunchest of the old 
Catholic gentry, and must have often sheltered priests. In 1641, 
" William Radcliffe of Ugthorpe, Gent," is among the Recusants presented 
to Quarter Sessions. And in 1637 we find the names of " Thomas 
290 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

Poskett, Tailor, and Margaret his wife of Ugthorpe," as Recusants. 
" Poskett " is " Postgate," written phonetically, and even now all 
old Yorkshire folk pronounce the martyr's name " Poskett." These good 
people were probably his near relatives. 

Another cow-byre close to the old hall (on the right hand as you 
face the front door), was once a Catholic chapel. People still living 
remember their parents speaking of the time when they used to hear 
Mass regularly in this humble sanctuary. There is little enough now to 
tell of its former sacred character, though there still can be seen what is 
called a holy-water stoup, but which is perhaps more probably an aumbry. 
It is sad to see this building, which once witnessed the Sacred Mysteries, 
now the home of the beasts of the field. But, after all, it was in such 
company that the Saviour of the world was born. 

A short walk from Ugthorpe Hall brings us out on " the lingy 
moor" where Father Postgate made his humble home. ("Ling, "it may 
be noted, is Yorkshire for heather.) This forms part of the great moors 
that cover this Cleveland district, stretching from Scarborough north- 
ward almost to Middlesbrough, and from Whitby eastward to the 
Hambleton Hills. The great moor was called the Cleveland Blacka- 
moor, and its wild romantic beauty is still the delight of the traveller, 
though of course in many places it has been encroached on by enclosed 
and cultivated land. Here the old apostle of the moors had his retreat. 

The thatched cottage in which he lived was standing within living 
memory, but some forty years ago it was unhappily pulled down. 
Fortunately the site is preserved, and its memory still cherished. It 
stood near the high road that leads across the moor from Guisborough 
to Whitby. Its site is now occupied by a small farm-house, hidden in a 
clump of trees, and known as the Hermitage or Pcstgate House. The 
old house was a very humble dwelling, a hermitage in fact as well as in 
name. It consisted of two rooms only, both on the ground floor, and 
paved with what are locally called " cobble-stones " undressed stones 
rounded unevenly by wear or by the action of water. (They are 
generally brought from the beach or from the beds of streams.) It was 
thatched, and there was no upper room nor any ceiling, the roof being 
open under the thatch. There was a small porch outside, from which 
one entered directly into the kitchen or living-room. 

There was a little garden in front, and my informant, a good 
Catholic, seventy-six years of age, who was born at Ugthorpe, said that 
she had been told by her grandmother that Father Postgate was the 
first to bring the daffodil to that part of the country. From another 
source I learned that for many generations the site of the martyr's 
garden was fragrant with white lilies, which grew there in profusion. 

291 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Of the little house, there is still one wall standing. This, which is 
now the outer wall of the farm-house, on the right as you face the 
entrance, is plastered to a certain height, and this part was, in fact, the 
inside wall of the martyr's kitchen. The plaster still shows the height 
and width of the building, though the wall itself has been heightened. 
There is now an open shed for carts built up against it, and in the pave- 
ment of this shed are still remains of the old cobble-stones which formed 
the kitchen floor. Catholics still live in the house and are proud to 
show what is left of the martyr's home. When the old house was pulled 
down, part of the oak beam which went across Father Postgate's bed- 
place was taken to Egton, and crosses were made of it, which are still 
preserved by the pious Catholics of the district. The present writer 
possesses one of these little crosses. 

In the Catholic Magazine for 1838 there is an interesting paper on 
" Nicholas Postgate, the Old Catholic Priest," by a writer who signs 
himself " J. W." and dedicates his work, with great affection, to Father 
Nicholas Rigby. He, too, bears testimony to that priest's influence in 
breaking down prejudice against the Faith. " I was born in the Church 
of England," he writes, "and bred in all its prejudices against the 
Church of Rome ; but having lately read several sound expositions of 
Catholic doctrines, with the loan of which I was favoured by you, I 
have conceived a respect for the priests of that persuasion, both as men 
and Christians, and am proportionately disgusted at the misrepresenta- 
tions that have been imposed on me by Protestant preachers." His 
account of Father Postgate, he goes on to say, is designed to be an act 
of reparation for the wrong which he had unwittingly done to the 
Church by prejudices, "which, however, can only have injured myself." 

The most valuable part of his paper is an account of the martyr's 
hermitage, as it then was. This I will quote at length : 

" He lived in a little cell in the midst of a wide moor. I have 
visited that cell, for it still 'stands where it stood.' It is one of the 
poorest huts of the poor a mere cattle-shed in appearance its little 
chimney alone denoting it to be a human habitation. There are two 
or three old ashen trees that bend their blasted forms, and point, with 
their bare branches, like the witches on the heath, as if to indicate the 
spot to the by-way traveller. Looking towards the north, the west, 
and the south, a black moor presents its desolate aspect ; but on the 
east, a long tract of cultivated land stretches like a promontory before 
whose brow a small sea-bay is visible. Vessels, diminished in the 
distance to the size of birds, seem stationary, as they skim with white 
wings across. After the eye has wandered like a dove seeking in vain 
for a green oasis, it rests with pleasure on the fields, the woods, the 
292 




c - 
rs. -, a. 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

park of Mulgrave, with its castle crowning the ridge that bounds the- 
horizon. . . . 

" I stooped to enter the lowly hut where pride must be put off with 
the hat. It consists of two small apartments, one emphatically styled 
' the house,' in which the domestic duties are done ; the other a place 
for rest : both are on the ground floor, which is paved with uneven, 
stones. The thatched roof is just overhead ; the latticed windows are 
very narrow, and deeply indented in the clumsy walls ; there is a hearth 
for a peat fire. Yet piety dwelt peacefully in this humble abode, and 
the sunbeam that shed a ray of glory within was a heavenly halo round 
its head. I was shown the spot where ' once the garden smiled,' but no- 
garden flowers remained; a few daffodils had long survived the rest, 
but the mistaken reverence of some visitors had led them to transplant 
those perennial relics into their own gardens. 

" No sounds, no sights, now denoted that a ' reverend hermit ' had 
passed his patriarchal days in this lonely cell, and yet there was a time 
when he was seen and heard by many children who were blessed by him. 
Many pious persons, who clung closer to their religion because it was 
proscribed by the rulers of this world, oft came in secret pilgrimage to- 
this cell, and revered the good Father more because he was content to 
render himself obnoxious to persecution for their sakes. . . . He had 
made a vow of poverty, and his path of life, though so lowly and lone, 
was a glorious path, for it led towards heaven. The alms which he 
received he gave to these poor penitents who confessed that poverty had 
led them into sin. He imposed a heavy penance upon the guilty, but 
made it light by paying the greater portion himself, and he was rewarded 
by witnessing the compunction of the sinner who felt remorse on seeing 
the innocent old man a voluntary sufferer for his sake. He encouraged 
the diffident by confessing to them his own sins. Those disagreeable 
duties which others shrank from doing he did for them, and sometimes 
seemed to go with the sinner, that he might insensibly lead him from 
the error of his ways. His crucifix was a better peacemaker than the 
constable's staff. The humanity of the man overcame the prejudices 
against the priest, and he first made strangers friends and then Christians. 
Bad men he treated as though they were good, and those who injured 
him as though they had benefited him. This was his method of re- 
claiming them ; and it generally succeeded. He regarded the persecutions 
against his Church as judgments sent for the amendment of her children,, 
and he conducted himself with a more perfect resignation, because he 
was under the ban of the law. . . . Such was his benevolent zeal, that 
some say he made above a thousand converts. However that may be, 
the majority of the people in that district are Catholics to this day." 

293- 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The Hermitage is about six miles from Whitby ; and a beautiful 
drive of about three miles more, across the moor, brings us to Egton, 
which is also closely connected with the dear old martyr. It was at 
Kirkdale House in this parish that he was born. And at Egton stands 
still the most interesting little Mass-house, where he used to offer the 
Holy Sacrifice in a humble loft. 

Near this old house is a grass field which was pointed out to me as 
having an interesting history. It rises high above the road, and its green 
slopes are visible for many miles round. My guide to!4 me that old 
men tell how, in the evil days, on Sunday mornings, sheets were laid out 
to dry, and the Catholics knew where Mass was to be said that day by 
the number of the sheets. My recollection is that the places named 
were Egton, Newbiggin in Eskdale side (once a home of the Salvins), 
and Sleights, all places within about six miles of Father Postgate's 
hermitage on the moor. Mr. Fallow, in his account of the Ugthorpe 
chalices, says: "Some linen sheets are preserved at Ugthorpe which 
used to be spread (as if to air) on the hedges, as a signal that he was in a 
neighbouring house and was about to say Mass." 

Another interesting tradition was told me. We have seen that the 
martyr was taken at the house of Matthew Lyth at Redbarns, Uggle- 
barnby, whither he had gone to baptize a child. (There is still a Catholic 
Matthew Lyth living in the neighbourhood.) With Lyth were im- 
prisoned two other Catholic yeomen, named Redman and Roe. 

They remained staunch for some months ; but when harvest-time 
came round, and their presence was sorely needed at home to look after 
their crops, Roe and Redman yielded, at least externally, and were released. 
Lyth, however, remained firm. And the old people say that ever since 
that day, while a Redman or a Roe has occasionally been known to go 
astray from the Faith, the Lyths have always remained faithful. I fear 
that in these days this is not absolutely true, but there are still many 
faithful Catholics of the name living in the neighbourhood. As the 
present venerable Bishop of the diocese testifies : " The Catholics of 
Egton really have the Faith" : they are no degenerate descendants of 
the martyr's flock. 

The principal interest at Egton centres round the old house, where 
Father Postgate had his little oratory, in which he seems at times to 
have reserved the Most Blessed Sacrament. It is an old thatched cottage 
which may date back to the sixteenth century, standing near the modern 
Anglican schools, on the summit of the hill. Through the kindness of 
a friend I am able to give an excellent photograph of the back or eastern 
side of this old Mass-house. 

The house is very low, with small windows in the low stone walls, 
294 




FT 

I 



O 

-H 

b 



w 

C/3 

D 



I J 
hs 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

and gabled roof of thatch. There is a lean-to porch in front which is 
comparatively modern. The martyr's secret oratory is in the thatched 
roof to the right of the picture. Its position is marked in the photo- 
graph by the upper window under the thatch. 

The pilgrim cannot but regard this humble oratory with deep 
veneration. Here a glorious martyr celebrated the Holy Mysteries 
year after year, at peril of his life. Here he retired to pray and to gain 
strength for his arduous labours from the presence of His Divine Master, 
Who condescended to dwell here in His Adorable Sacrament. From 
this loft the humble priest carried Him to His faithful persecuted 
children, to console them in sickness, and to be their Viaticum. 

The place is so tiny that there is hardly room for any one but a 
server to assist at the Sacrifice. At most, two or three could have knelt 
behind. Probably the worshippers were content to kneel in the kitchen 
below, from which they would hear the sound of the sacring-bell (if, 
indeed, the use of a bell were compatible with safety), and the voice of 
the priest, though they would hardly be able to see him. The loft is 
very dark. There is, however, one tiny window, at the end of a kind 
of tunnel through the thatch, on the level of the floor. It seems to be 
of later date, and it is probable that nothing but the tapers of the altar 
ever cast a light there, in the martyr's time. It was in sanctuaries 
such as these that the English Church kept vigil in the days of her 
sorrow. The darkness and stifling air of so confined a space must 
have recalled vividly to the martyr priests those sanctuaries of the 
Roman Catacombs in which the Christians of the first ages met to 
celebrate the same Divine Mysteries, and to gain strength from them to 
endure a persecution not more cruel. 

The very existence of this oratory was long unknown. No doubt, at 
the time of the martyr's arrest, the entrance to it was carefully closed, 
and in the lapse of time it became forgotten. It was only discovered by 
accident in the early years of the nineteenth century, probably in the 
thirties. The story of the discovery, as related by a member of the family 
who lived in the house at the time, is a very interesting one. A girl, 
mounted on a ladder, was employed in cleaning the upper part of the 
kitchen wall, when she found the plaster give way under her hand, and 
she broke into the long-hidden doorway to the loft. To her amazement, 
she found herself looking into an oratory, with the altar prepared for 
Mass, with the vestments lying spread out upon it, with the missal, 
crucifix, candlesticks, and all that was necessary for the Sacrifice. She 
hastened to apprise Mr. Harrison, the tenant of the house, who was 
himself a devout Catholic. The welcome news was at once conveyed to 
the Vicar-Apostolic of the Northern District, Bishop Penswick, who soon 

295 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

afterwards came to see for himself. He found that everything remained 
as it had been left by Father Postgate when he last said Mass there. The 
Bishop left the altar-stone, tabernacle, two crucifixes (one with relics in 
it), and other treasures in the charge of the Harrison family, but most 
of the relics he took away with him. 

The altar-stone and other furniture of the altar were finally removed 
to the chapel at Egton Bridge in 1850 by the Rev. Andrew Macartney, 
then priest-in-charge. The tabernacle framework and door still remained, 
however, in their original position, under the charge of old Mr. John 
Harrison. Shortly before his death, the door was carried off by a well- 
known Anglican clergyman, now deceased, who visited the house, garbed 
in cassock and cloak, as though a Catholic priest, and persuaded Mr. 
Harrison to let him take this relic away with him. The Catholics of 
Egton, whose good faith was thus deceived, have been hitherto unable to 
recover the lost treasure ; though I have been fortunate enough to 
-secure a photograph of it. The framework of the tabernacle, however, 
.remained in place until the death of Mr. Harrison, at the age of 
ninety-nine. It was then removed by Canon Callebert, the Catholic 
rector of Egton Bridge. The oak step-ladder, which the martyr 
used to mount to his little oratory, has been removed and cut up 
for relics. Canon Callebert has a large piece of the wood, and at 
St. Mary's Convent, York, there are preserved several small crosses 
.made out of it. 

Before leaving the Mass-house, a few minutes may be spent profit- 
ably in studying the structure with the aid of the plans here given, 
which I owe to the kindness of Father Storey, the present rector of 
Egton Bridge. 

The east elevation, it should be noted, is the back of the house, i.e., 
the side turned from the road. The road to Egton Bridge runs at the 
foot of the garden on the west side of the house. The structure is a 
very simple one, just a thatched cottage of one story, with a loft under 
the thatch. Since my photographs were taken, a new building has been 
added to the primitive structure, but we need take no account of this. 
Its position is marked on the plan. 

The interior consists of a kitchen or living-room and two bedrooms, 
A and B. The small dark loft, C, in which our martyr celebrated the 
Divine Mysteries, and in which the Most Holy made His sacramental 
dwelling, is situated above the two bedrooms. Till quite recently access 
to it was gained by a ladder, which was set up in the kitchen, and led 
direct to the loft through a low door (marked C in the section). How- 
ever, since the present occupants took the house, they have, unfortunately, 
altered the entrance to the loft. They have boarded up the door C, and 
296 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

have removed the ladder to bedroom B, so that now you gain access to 
the loft through a trap-door in the ceiling of this bedroom. 

The loft is a very singular place in its way, and it has most touch- 
ing interest for the pilgrim. It is very small, only 15 ft. by 10 ft., 





SECTION THRO' LIVING ROOM 



Al 



I BEDROOMS 



(jr. 
P. HIDI-4C F 



n.*~J 




WEST ELEVATION 
Ta yroff Brrice* > 

OLD MASS- HOUSE , EGTON - * . . . f . . . . r * 



and not more than 5 ft. 6 in. high in the middle, below what is called 
in Yorkshire the " rigging-tree," the main beam of the roof. At the 
end in the wall opposite the old entrance is a hole, now boarded up and 
papered over, which served as the tabernacle. 

There is yet another indispensable feature of this hidden sanctuary. 
In the ground plan of the cottage the part marked off (D) was a hiding- 
place (now thrown into the room), which communicated with a trap- 
door in the floor of the loft. It was down this hole that the priest 
could escape, in case of need, by means of a ladder. It appears that 
2P 297 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

originally there was an exit from this hiding-place into some houses 
adjoining which are now pulled down. The new addition to the house 
now takes the place of this old building. 

It would be difficult to find more romantic and beautiful scenery 
than that which meets the pilgrim's eyes, as he gazes from the top of 
Egton Hill down into the valley of the Eslc at his feet. In com- 
plete contrast to the wild lingy moor behind him, here is nature in 
her softest mood : splendid woods, green pastures, the rippling river, 
framed by the distant moors and hills around. There are few spots, even 
in this favoured county, more romantic and beautiful than Egton Bridge 
and Glaisdale. The paradise of the tourist and the angler, it has also 
special joys for the Catholic pilgrim. The Catholic church of St. Hedda 
is a really noble building, worthy of its high purpose, and forming the 
greatest possible contrast to the humble little Mass-house of the martyr 
priest on the hill above. It has been furnished with loving and artistic 
care by the venerable Belgian priest who has spent over forty years of his 
sacerdotal life in this remote Yorkshire village ; and the elaborate 
Stations of the Cross, the carved-oak pulpit, the sculptured " Mysteries 
of the Rosary," let into the external walls, the Grotto of Lourdes and 
Stable of Bethlehem erected in the presbytery garden, speak to him of 
the art and devotion of his native land, while they teach to Yorkshire 
Catholics the truths of the one Faith more vividly than was possible in 
the days of Father Postgate.* 

Here are preserved some relics of the old martyr that are of deepest 
interest. In the altar of the Lady Chapel is inserted the altar-stone 
from the Mass-house at Egton, on which the old priest must so often 
have offered the Holy Sacrifice. This altar-stone, like most of those 
that have been preserved from the times of persecution, is a small 
square piece of slate, without any receptacle for relics, but with the five 
crosses rudely scratched upon it. In the sacristy is a piece of oak 
framework in the shape of a triangle, with some carving on the sides. 
This is the pent-house roof to the door of the tabernacle, which we have 
already seen in the loft of the Egton Mass-house. The tabernacle itself 
was a mere hole in the wall ; and we have already learned the fate of the 
door. 

In the presbytery are preserved still more relics. There are 
two pyx-bags which the martyr is said to have used in carrying 
the Blesssd Sacrament to the sick. One is heart-shaped, made 
of old blue and white brocade, with little flame-like tassels of yellow 
silk at intervals round the edges, which are bordered with yellow silk 

* Canon Callebert has now retired from active work, but happily still lives on at 
Egton Bridge. 
298 




DOOR OF FATHER POSTGATE'S TABER- 
NACLE, FROM THE OLD MASS-HOUSE 

AT EGTON To face page*) 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

braid. This was till lately at Whitby, in the possession of Jane Harrison, 
a staunch Catholic, who was descended from the woman who " did 
for" Father Postgate, and was, no doubt, a relative of old Mr. Harrison, 
who inhabited the Egton Mass-house. She gave it to the present 
Bishop of Middlesbrough, who gave it to the church at Egton Bridge. 
The second bag is made of green silk, lined with red ; it is of the usual 
shape, and is much worn and frayed. It is fastened at the neck with 
cord and tassels of green silk. This was given to Canon Callebert by 
an old woman, named Ann Redman, who cherished it during her lifetime 
as a very great treasure. She belonged to a very old Catholic family, 
the Hodgsons of Bigginhouse, and lived at Egton. 

There is also a crystal cross of delicate workmanship, ornamented 
with silver filigree, containing a relic of the true Cross. This came 
from old Mr. Harrison's house at Egton, where the martyr used to say 
Mass. The crucifix which now hangs on Father Postgate's rosary, 
preserved at St. Hilda's, Whitby, also came from this house. It belonged 
to Bishop Briggs, who, on his death-bed, left it to Canon Callebert. 
He, knowing it to have belonged to the rosary, gave it to the priest at 
Whitby, who had possession of the beads. These beads form a complete 
chaplet of five decades and are made apparently of bone, strung on a 
piece of cord. They are large beads, and at the end of the chaplet is a 
large boss or ball of what is apparently leather (unless, indeed, it be 
some Oriental bean), to which is attached a tassel of red silk. The 
metal crucifix already mentioned is attached to this tassel. 

Another place connected by tradition with our martyr is the quaint 
old town of Pickering, which was his market-town. Here, it is said, 
he used to come, disguised as a gardener, to minister to the little flock 
which had remained faithful throughout the persecution. In a garden, 
adjoining the present Catholic church, a pear-tree is shown which it is 
said that he pruned. 

While ministering to the Catholics in and around Pickering, Father 
Postgate is said by tradition to have inhabited a small thatched cottage, 
built on the site of the gardener's house in the quarry just outside the 
town, on the Whitby side. The site of this little sanctuary is very 
romantic and beautiful, though so near the town. It is in full view of 
the frowning old castle, whose ruined towers overshadow it. Here, 
then, the aged priest lived in the gardener's cottage, and here, too, his 
memory remains in benediction. 

It is said that the mode of intimating to the people that the priest 
had arrived, and that Mass would be said in the cottage on the 
following morning, was just as at Egton, by spreading sheets on the 
hedge adjoining the cottage. This practice was not, indeed, confined 

299 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

to Father Postgate ; we have met with traces of it in other parts of the 
country. 

The old man seems to have been fond of gardening ; the flowers that 
blossomed round his hermitage were a proof of it, and as we saw, 
tradition credits him with the introduction of the daffodil. And what 
character would be more suitable for the saintly labourer who, in the 
sweat of his brow, toiled in the vineyard of his Lord, from the earliest 
to the eleventh hour, bearing the burden and heat of the day ? His 
task was to root up the weeds and briars that heresy had sown so thickly 
in the garden of the Lord, and to cultivate the flowers and fruits of 
virtue. Thus he was made like to Him who was taken for the gardener 
as He stood by His empty grave, who Himself tells us with what care 
and love He digs round and manures the sterile tree, hoping against 
hope that it will at last bring forth fruit unto eternal life. 

The pilgrim cannot refrain from adding that the spirit of the aged 
martyr priest is still alive at Pickering. The devoted priest who, in 
spite of the most abject poverty, has laboured there for the last seven 
years, has still an uphill task before him. When he was sent there, 
things were at their lowest ebb ; there were but two Catholics left in 
the old town where the mural frescoes and the very stones of the grand 
old parish church still speak so eloquently of the faith of bygone days ; 
but by dint of suffering and labour equal surely to that of any missionary 
in a heathen land, borne with silent heroism and offered up as a sacrifice 
for his people, Father Postgate's successor at Pickering is gradually 
breaking up the hard and frozen soil, and causing it to flourish once 
more with the flowers of faith and devotion. His vineyard is still but 
a little one, yet there is promise in Pickering of the Second Spring, and 
hope that the wilderness will once more flourish and blossom as the 
garden of the Lord. He sadly needs help and encouragement in his 
difficult and laborious task, and may God grant that, for His martyr's 
sake, help may be given to him generously ! 

Already Father Bryan has earned one rich reward. In answer to his 
prayers and entreaties, an altar-stone, which the blessed martyr used to 
carry about with him, has been given to his little sanctuary, and is now 
let into the altar of St. Joseph's Church, at Pickering. This altar-stone, 
of the kind already described, has an interesting history. It was given 
by the martyr to Mrs. Fairfax, wife of Mr. Charles Fairfax of York, 
who, as Challoner tells us, was a great friend of Father Postgate's, and 
who visited him in prison. She gave it to her friend, the Rev. John 
Knaresborough, who is so well known as a chronicler of the lives of 
many of our martyrs. She also gave him " a piece of cloth dipped in 
Mr. Posket's blood by Thomas Garlick (present at the execution), a 
300 




RELICS OF FATHER POSTGATE 
I. Roi(f>-\' ; 2. Relic of the true Cross ; 
3 and 4. Pyx-bags. Photo l>\ Sutc/i/e, Whit by 

To face f age 300 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 

servant of Mr. Tunstall's of Wycliffe." Both Garlick and Tunstall, it 
may be noted, are martyr names. Mr. Knaresborough left the altar- 
stone to the Rev. Ambrose Witham of Cadeby, who left it, with the 
residue of his property, to the Rev. Thomas Daniel, who gave it to the 
priest of Dodding Green, where it remained till the year 1908, much 
venerated as a precious relic. But the incumbent of that mission, with 
the kind consent of his Bishop, has now generously given it (under certain 
conditions) to Pickering. 

We must not close without giving a description of the other precious 
relics of the dear old Yorkshire martyr which still remain. 

Alas ! we have not succeeded in discovering where his sacred body 
lies. Challoner tells us that " his quartered body was given to his 
friends," and that " the following inscription was put upon a copper 
plate and thrown into his coffin " : 

Here lies that reverend and -pious divine, T)r. Nicholas Postgate, who was 
educated in the English College at Douay. And after he had laboured, fifty 
years, (to the admirable benefit and conversion of hundreds of souls'], was at 
last advanced to a glorious crown of martyrdom at the city of Tork, on the 
~/th of August, 1679, having been priest 51 years, aged 82. 

One of his hands, we are told, " is preserved in Douay College." 
This is, no doubt, the right hand, which is now preserved at St. Cuthbert's, 
Old Elvet, Durham. It is the small hand of an old man, the skin 
desiccated and brown. The little finger is missing. But it is said to be 
preserved in some other church, the name of which is not known to the 
present custodians of the hand. Portions of the skin have been pared off 
down to the bone for relics, especially between the thumb and forefinger. 
The nails are intact. The fingers are contracted towards the thumb. 
The hand has been severed from the arm at the wrist. Another touching 
relic preserved here consists of two locks of silky white hair tied together 
crosswise with red silk. There is also the entire lower jaw-bone of the 
martyr. The teeth are all missing. Yet another relic is a vertebra of 
the backbone. All these relics of Father Postgate were examined and 
certified by Bishop Hogarth in 1853. 

Our martyr's left hand is in possession of the Benedictines of 
St. Lawrence's Abbey, Ampleforth, near York. The thumb and fore- 
finger of this hand are missing. The paper that contained it is inscribed 
in a contemporary hand. "This Paper contains ye Hand of ye Rev. 
Mr. Postgate Priest who dy'd for his Faith, in suffering Martyrdom at 
ye City of York Anno Domi 1680 togeather with a cloath that was 
diped in his Blood. As alsoe certain very valluable & well attested 
Reliques of Saints. Therefore whoere thou art be very careful of thy 

301 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

conduct herein." (Endorsed, " The Rev. Mr. Postgate's Hand with 
several Reliques &c.") It may be conjectured that this relic also came 
through the Fairfax family. At Ampleforth, too, is treasured the little 
bone crucifix, already figured in these pages, which the old martyr wore 
at his death. It is very rude, almost grotesque in its simplicity. 

The present Bishop of Middlesbrough cherishes a precious little 
book which belonged to Father Postgate, and still has his autograph 
inscribed on the fly-leaf. It is a little book of moral theology for the 
use of priests, slphorismi Confessariorum, by the famous Jesuit theologian, 
Father Emmanuel Sa. It is a product of an Antwerp press and is dated 
1 599. Opposite the title-page, the name, Nicholaus Postgayt, is written 
in a bold firm hand. His Lordship very kindly lent me the book, so 
that I was able to photograph the signature. 

At St. Mary's Convent, York, is preserved a piece of the rope with 
which he was hanged, while " the Blod of the Gloreses marter lather 
Poscatt " may be venerated at Downside Abbey; St. Benedict's Priory, 
Colwich ; Stonyhurst College ; and elsewhere. 

At St. Mary's College, Oscott, is preserved a very interesting 
collection of the martyr's relics. One is a piece of linen stufF, 
lined with canvas, with a buttonhole in one corner ; it is labelled 
" Mr. Poskefs cape he woore 30 years." Besides this little cape 
there are a lock of hair, a piece of his " backbone when quartered," 
a piece of the rope, and a cloth stained with his blood. These 
relics belonged to Mrs. Juliana Dorington, a pious Catholic lady, 
who lived at Old Oscott for many years, and died there in 1731. She 
seems to have acted as housekeeper to the Rev. Andrew Bromwich, a 
venerable priest who was condemned to death for his faith, at Stafford, 
August 13, 1679, during the same persecution which proved fatal to 
Father Postgate, but who escaped death, and may be considered the real 
founder of Oscott. No doubt he knew Father Postgate personally, and 
thus these touching relics have the best of pedigrees. 

Finally, an altar crucifix and a candle, which come from the Egton 
Mass-house, are now in possession of a member of the Harrison family 
at Scarborough. 

I have done my best to gather together notices of all these scattered 
treasures, and here to put them on record, lest through the lapse of 
time any be lost sight of or forgotten. It only remains to give the 
text of Father Postgate's hymn. 



302 



A MARTYR OF THE YORKSHIRE MOORS 



r J 
- 






^- 

f 



r^tr r 



i 



t= 






:/L-,L^ 



m 



t 





1 '' ' i 





> 


|E? 

, i J . 


f -t 






<s 



" O gracious God, O Saviour sweet, 

Jesus, think of me ; 
And suffer me to kiss Thy feet 

Though late I come to Thee. 

" Behold, dear Lord, I come to Thee, 

With sorrow and with shame, 
For when Thy bitter Wounds I see, 

1 know I caused the same. 

" O sweetest Lord, lend me the wings 

Of faith and perfect love, 
That I may fly from earthly things 
And mount to those above. 

" For there is joy both true and fast, 

And no cause to lament, 
But here is toil both first and last, 
And cause oft to repent. 



" But now my soul doth hate the things 

In which she took delight, 
And unto Thee, the King of Kings, 
Would fly with all her might. 

" But oh, the weight of flesh and blood 

Doth sore my soul detain ; 
Unless Thy grace doth work, O God ! 
I rise but fall again. 

" And thus, dear Lord, I fly about 

In weak and weary case, 
And like the dove that Noe sent out 
I find no resting-place. 

" My wearied wings, sweet Jesus, mark, 

And when Thou thinkest best, 
Stretch forth Thy hand out of the ark, 
And take me to Thy rest ! " 



33 



WOODCOCK HALL AND 
THE MARTYR'S ALTAR 

ONE of the most venerable relics of the persecution still 
remaining in Catholic hands is the old missionary altar, which 
has been the treasured possession of the Burgess family since 
the early days of Queen Elizabeth. It is now the property 
of Mr. Thomas Clarkson, of Bolton-le-Sands, who kindly allowed me to 
photograph it some years ago. 

The late Rev. Thomas Abbot, of Monmouth, a venerable old priest, 
whose mother was a Burgess, inherited the altar; and in his last years of 
retirement at Lancaster used to say Holy Mass on it every day. He gave 
me the following account of the family traditions concerning it, which 
had been handed down to him by his uncle, Bishop Burgess of Clifton, 
who died in 1854. 

The altar is in the shape of a wardrobe or bureau, and when closed 
gives no indication of its true character. In Mr. Pike's beautiful drawing, 
which we reproduce, it is represented both open and shut up. It was 
made in i 560 by the Mr. Burgess of the day, who was at that time acting 
as agent and bailiff to the Townleys, near Burnley in Lancashire. (It will 
be remembered that by Elizabeth's Act of Uniformity, Holy Mass became 
an illegal act on St. John's Day, June 24, 1559.) The object was that 
the Townley family and their dependents should be able to hear Mass 
in secret in Mr. Burgess's house, which was situated close to the family 
mansion, and thus avoid the danger of having their estates confiscated, 
which would have occurred had the altar or priest been discovered in the 
mansion. 

As it was, Mr. Townley had to undergo a life-long persecution for 
his adherence to the ancient Faith. According to an inscription beneath 
his portrait in the gallery at Townley Hall, he was imprisoned in no fewer 
than nine prisons, and, at the age of seventy- three, when he had become 
blind, " was bound to appear and keep within five miles of Townley his 
house. Who hath paid into the Exchequer twenty pounds a month 
and doth still (1601), so that there is paid already above five thousand 
pounds." 

After Mr. John Townley's first imprisonment, about 1564, the neigh- 
bourhood of Burnley became too dangerous for Mr. Burgess and his 
family to remain there. They therefore removed to a large farm under 
the Hoghtons of Hoghton Tower. The farm, called Denham Hall, was 
in the parish of Brindle, and about three miles distant from Hoghton 
Tower. Mr. Burgess placed the altar in a large room in the old farm- 
34 




2 Q 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

house, for the convenience of the numerous Catholics living there under 
the protection of the Hoghtons. 

In Easter-tide, 1581, Blessed Edmund Campion said Mass at this 
altar, and remained at Denham Hall until the Worthingtons carried him 
off, in the disguise of a groom, to Blainscough Hall.* 

When the Hoghton family lost the Faith, i.e., about the year 1611, 
the Burgess family found it necessary to remove to a more distant and 
sequestered farm called Woodend, in the neighbouring parish of Clayton- 
le-Woods. They, of course, took the altar with them. 

It is very unfortunate that Woodend has been pulled down, as two 
illustrious martyrs visited the house, and said Mass on the old altar there. 

The first was the Venerable Edmund Arrowsmith, who, after his 
release from his first imprisonment for the Faith, said Mass here in the 
year 1622. The other was the Franciscan martyr, Venerable John 
Woodcock, who said his last Mass here on the Feast of the Assumption, 
1644, being apprehended the same day. We are able to give some 
interesting details of this memorable event, and also a beautiful drawing 
of Woodcock Hall, the martyr's birthplace, which is, happily, standing, 
and is only about two miles from Woodend. 

Woodcock Hall stands near Lostock, on the road from Leyland to 
Bamber Bridge.f It has now fallen from its former state, and is divided 
into two tenements. When we visited it the smaller portion of the house 
was inhabited by Catholics. The fine oak doors, staircase and panelling in 
the main part of the house are tokens that it was once a residence of some 
importance. There are said to be traces of a hiding-place, but the place 
shown us was not very convincing. The old house is very picturesque, 
and has about it something of the air of mystery and aloofness which 
one looks for in a forgotten shrine. For it is chiefly venerable as a 
martyr's birthplace. 

John Woodcock (in religion Father Martin of St. Felix, O.F.M.) 
was, in fact, born in this house in 1603. His father had conformed to 
save his estate, which had been in the family above four hundred years,J 
but his pious mother (an Anderton by birth) kept firm to the Catholic 
faith. She sent her son to the English College at St. Omer's, and from 
thence he went on to that of Rome, where he studied for the priesthood. 
But he felt himself irresistibly- drawn to a more penitential life, and 

* Bee In the Brave Days of Old, by the present writer, "The Worthington Boys" 
(Burns and Gates). 

f We are informed that there is another Woodcock Hall at Newburgh, about four 
miles distant, which belonged to the same family. 

\ In the Free Library at Wigan are a number of deeds connected with the family and 
its property, some as old as the reign of King John. They were presented by the present 
squire, Colonel Farrington, of VVorden Hall, Leyland. 
306 



WOODCOCK HALL AND THE MARTYR'S ALTAR 

therefore, leaving Rome, he sought admission among the Capuchins at 
Paris. 

Dr. Oliver says* he saw a letter from him to Father Thomas 
Fitzherbert, S.J., the Rector of the English College, dated September 25, 
1630, thanking him for the many kindnesses he had shown him, and telling 
him that he had worn the habit, he " thanks sweet Jesus, almost now 
a year." It was not, however, God's will that he should spend his life 
in France, and, to his great sorrow, he was dismissed by the Capuchins as 
unsuitable. After many difficulties, rebuffs, and internal struggles, he 
was finally admitted, at his most earnest entreaty, to the English Convent 
of St. Bonaventure at Douay, and clothed with the habit of St. Francis 
by the future martyr, Father Heath, in the year 1631^ 

He became the model of the novitiate, excelling all his fervent 
companions in strict observance and mortification, while his wonderful 
gift of prayer brought him into close communion with God and His 
angels. In 1632 he made his vows in the hands of another future 
martyr, Father Francis Bell. Two years later he was ordained priest. 

He was consumed with the desire of martyrdom, especially after the 
glorious death of Father Heath at Tyburn in 1643, and implored his 
Superiors to permit him to go to England, although so feeble in health 
that it was feared he was stricken with mortal disease. He wrote : 
" I beseech you, by the tender love of the most sweet Jesus, to send your 
consent without delay. Reverend Father, the season admits of no 
delay; winter approaches, and my health through this anxiety and even 
others that are greater, is not strengthened and confirmed as your 
Reverence, and even myself, could expect. Wherefore, for the love of 
God (kneeling now in my cell), I ask you on my knees to say Amen and 
to send me your consent as soon as possible." 

This letter touched the Guardian's heart, and brought the long- 
desired permission. As Father Woodcock was hurrying on his preparations 
for departure, the news of Father Bell's martyrdom reached him 
(December n, 1643). Thus both he who had clothed him and he 
who had received his vows, were now with the martyrs of Christ in 
heaven. The news inflamed his ardour still more. Thirsting to be 
united to Christ by the same sufferings, he set out in the spring of 1644, 
and, after some perils, landed at Newcastle-on-Tyne. His first thoughts 
were for his family and friends, many of whom needed reconciling to 
God; but it was not till the Vigil of the Assumption (August 14), that 
he finally reached his home. He at once made arrangements to say 

* Collections, p. 563. 

t For the details of Father Woodcock's life, see Certamen Seraphicitm, by Father Angelus 
Mason, O.F.M. (New Edition ; Quarrachi, 1885), p. 183 et seq. 

37 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Mass during the night on the missionary altar at Woodend, for the 
Burgess family and the neighbouring Catholics. 

But just as he had finished hearing confessions and was standing in 
his vestments to commence the Mass of the Assumption when the clock 
should strike twelve, one of the Catholics came rushing in to beg all to 
disperse immediately, as the pursuivants were coming ! Father Woodcock 
immediately took off his vestments, closed up the altar, and got into the 
priests' hiding-hole, before the pursuivants arrived. 

When they came up to the room, Mrs. Burgess, who had thrown 
herself into a rocking-chair, protested against their rude intrusion into 
a sick woman's room at that time of night. But they said _ they had 
come with a warrant to apprehend the popish priest. She said, " You 
will not find a man in my room at this time of night." They asked, 
" What are all these people assembled here for, if it be not to meet the 
popish priest ? " She said, " They are some neighbours who have come 
to sit up with me." 

They searched the farm-house, but happily could find no trace of the 
hidden priest, and left, disappointed of their prey. As soon as the 
pursuivants were gone, Father Woodcock came out from his place of 
concealment, and the few Catholics in the immediate neighbourhood 
returning, he said Mass, gave them Holy Communion and then hastened 
away before daybreak to his father's house. 

Early the next morning the traitor who had summoned the pur- 
suivants hastened to them again, saying : " I had quite forgotten. There 
is a hiding-hole in that house, for I once went there courting the servant- 
maid when the mistress was absent, but she came back earlier than was 
expected, and I was put into the hiding-place. I think I can find it 
again, behind a certain panel." The pursuivants returned with the traitor 
to the house at Woodend, and he went immediately to the hiding-hole 
and withdrew the panel, but found the place empty. 

Mr. Woodcock, hearing this, was afraid if the priest was caught in 
the mansion that he would lose his estate, and therefore gave his son 
his breakfast, and ordered him out of the house as quickly as possible. 
The holy priest had not got a mile away from his father's house when 
the traitor and the pursuivants overtook him on Bamber Bridge, arrested 
him, and brought him before the magistrates, who ordered them to 
convey him to Lancaster Castle. There he was kept in prison for 
two years, and was put to a cruel death, with two secular priests, on 
August 7, 1646. 

Owing to the trouble brought on them through this tragic event, 
the Burgess family removed once more with their precious altar, now 
dearer to them than ever. They put themselves under the protection 
308 




THE OLD MISSIONARY 
ALTAR OPENED AND 
CLOSED 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of the great Catholic family of Gerard of Brynn, in the parish of Ashton- 
in-Makerfield, near Warrington. They remained there till they were 
able to secure a tenement lease for three lives, according to the custom 
of those times, of a farm called the Hawkslough, in Cuerden, situated 
near Bamber Bridge. 

Here, in a large parlour, the altar was placed, and was much 
frequented by the numerous Catholics of that neighbourhood. Upon 
the expiration of the lease, Mr. Thomas Burgess (father of Bishop 
Burgess of Clifton), the penal laws not being then so stringently 
enforced, was able to purchase from the Booth family a plot of waste 
land at Clayton Brook, adjoining the old farm of the Hawkslough, 
upon which, in 1784, he built the present brick house. He placed the 
altar in a large room at the back of the house, until the Chapels of 
Brownedge, Clayton Green, and Leyland were opened. 

Upon the death of Mr. Thomas Burgess, which occurred in 
1843, the house being let to a Protestant, the altar was removed to a 
private oratory in the house of the Bishop's sister, Mrs. Ann Abbot, at 
Brockholes, near Preston in Lancashire ; and after her death, to the 
house of her daughter, wife to Mr. Henry Clarkson, of Bolton-le-Sands, 
for the commencement of that new mission in 1886. 

Upon Mr. Clarkson's death, his widow, Helen Clarkson, retired to 
Lancaster, and by the permission of Bishop O'Reilly, the altar was 
removed from Bolton-le-Sands, and set up in a little oratory in Dale 
Street, Lancaster, by the Rev. Thomas Abbot, Mrs. Clarkson's brother, on 
June 30, 1891. Here Bishop O'Reilly often used to visit it and make 
his meditation in the little chapel, in veneration of the glorious martyrs 
who had offered the Holy Sacrifice upon it. Here, too. we visited it in 
June 1906, not long after the death of the venerable priest who took 
such a holy pride in it. 

A detailed description of the appearance of the old altar is un- 
necessary, as the drawing shows it well. Various pious ornaments 
added in modern times have here been omitted. The oak is very dark, 
though part of the woodwork has been spoilt by paint. There are 
curious iron hinges to the upper doors, which cannot be seen in the 
drawing. The carved panel at the back, which serves as a reredos, is of 
very black oak ; it may possibly have been used for another purpose 
before the altar was made. The pillars which divide the upper doors 
from the centre of the altar, are covered with a scale-like ornament ; 
they are detached, and really belong to the lower half of the altar. They 
formed the supports of a plain front which is now kept separately. The 
pediment at the top, carved with the sacred monogram surrounded with 
rays, and very rude cherub heads, is held in position only by a couple 
310 



WOODCOCK HALL AND THE MARTYR'S ALTAR 

of pegs, so that it could be easily removed when the altar was not in 
use. It is made to slip conveniently into the lower part of the altar. 

The original altar-stone is very small, but Father Abbot used a 
larger one. He also fitted to the old projecting ledge of the bureau, 
which was the original mensa, a much larger slab of wood, so that Mass 
could be more conveniently celebrated. 

The little tabernacle contains an old silver chalice and paten. On 
the chalice is engraved, " When Him you see, remember me," with 
I.H.S. and A.S. on either side of a heart. In the long drawer beneath 
the modern mensa, are two small altar-stones and a missal of 1609, 
which formerly belonged to the English Benedictine nuns of Our Lady 
of Consolation of Cambray, now at Stanbrook. In other drawers are 
the vestments, some of which date from penal times. Those used by 
Venerable Father Woodcock are still to be seen, and the /><?//, described 
later on among the relics, was given by Father Abbot to the present 
writer. 

Father Woodcock's vestment is much worn with age. It could be 
used for either red or white, as it is composed of these two colours. 
The old alb is very handsome, of cambric, with old point-lace let in. 
There are three chalice-veils with old embroidery, one of which is 
exquisitely worked, and is now framed and hung on the wall. Several 
other old vestments had to be destroyed, they were so moth-eaten. 

The altar has now been taken back to Bolton-le-Sands, and set up in 
a private oratory in the house of Mr. Thomas Clarkson. 



3 11 



THE OLD CHAPEL AT MAWDESLEY 

MAWDESLEY is in the very heart of that blessed land 
where the Faith still flourishes, where farmer, labourer and 
squire are united in one holy bond, and where the large 
plain Catholic chapels have extensive stabling attached to 
them for the sake of the faithful who drive or ride, sometimes from 
long distances, to Holy Mass. 

Mawdesley lies in a rural district, about seven miles south-west of 
Chorley, in the midst of pleasant, undulating country, so that the pilgrim 
fancies himself farther away than is in fact the case, from the chimneys 
and collieries which make Lancashire what it is to-day. 

Mawdesley stands high. From the great " Town Field " behind the 
Hall, the surrounding district for miles can be seen. Harrock Hill, 
which overhangs the village, is a famous beacon. From its summit one 
enjoys a complete sweep of scenery, stretching on the western side from 
the dimly towering hills of Wales to the grey mountains of Cumberland. 
On the north, the intervening ground, belted at the outer rim with the 
waters of the Irish Sea, opens out before one like a gigantic panorama, 
embracing some dozen towns and above twenty villages. Eastward the 
eye ranges over Wigan and Chorley to the belt of hills beyond them. 

In the hall at the foot of the hill, the glorious martyr, Venerable 
John Rigby, was born in 1570, when beacon-fires were blazing on the 
hill above to announce the Catholic Rising in the north. As he was 
dragged to die at St. Thomas's Waterings in South London, he answered 
an inquiry thus : " I am a poor gentleman of the House of Harrock in 
Lancashire ; my age about thirty years ; and my judgment and con- 
demnation to this death is only and merely for that I answered the 
judge that 1 was reconciled, and for that I refused to go to Church." 

He then disclosed the divine secret that he had preserved his virginal 
purity to the end, forcing his questioner to cry out in admiration : " I 
see that thou hast worthily deserved a virgin's crown ; I pray God send 
thee the kingdom of heaven, and desire thee to pray for me." 

The Hall itself is disappointing, as the greater part of it is modern. 
But there is one portion which may be as old as the date of the martyr's 
birth, and here we were shown the position of a priests' hiding-place. 

The great house has long been untenanted, and it is very desolate. 
Grass has grown over the gravel drive, and the rain streams in through 
more than one gaping hole in the roof. Our footsteps echoed dismally 
through the large empty rooms and corridors where there was little to 
remind one of the brave young man who was born and brought up there 
three centuries ago. 
312 



THE OLD CHAPEL AT MAWDESLEY 

But at Mawdesley there is a forgotten shrine, which has far higher 
interest for the pilgrim. Lane End House is the home of the Finches, 
a family which boasts not only of its own martyr, Venerable John 
Finch, a young layman, who suffered at Lancaster, April 20, 1584, 
but is also closely connected by marriage with the Haydocks of 
Cottain Hall, and therefore with the Venerable George Haydock, 
priest, who shed his blood at Tyburn, February 12, 1583-4. His 
thrilling story has been so vividly told by Mr. Gillow * that we need 
not recount it here. 

The quaint old house was erected in the sixteenth century, and had 
more than one hiding-place for priests. The chapel is at the top of 
the house, under the roof, and is unusually spacious. Till the church 
was built in 1831, it was, indeed, the only chapel which the numerous 
Catholics of the district could attend. When the last Squire Haydock 
of Cottam Hall died, outlawed, for his share in the Jacobite rising of 
1715, the treasures till then preserved at Cottam were transferred to 
Mawdesley. Thus in the house hang portraits of the Haydocks, and a 
great hatchment with their armorial bearings. Mary Haydock, sister 
of the last Squire, had married Thomas Finch of Mawdesley, and to 
Mawdesley in 17 14 came the Rev. Cuthbert Haydock, a younger brother 
of the Squire,! to act as chaplain and minister to the faithful of the 
neighbourhood. He devised his estate to his great-nephew, James 
Finch, and some of his books are still preserved in the little sacristy 
adjoining the chapel. 

But the greatest treasure of Mawdesley is the martyr's skull, which 
had been religiously preserved at Cottam till the estate passed into other 
hands. It was kept in a faded red velvet bag, and after it was translated 
to Mawdesley, was concealed in the priests' hiding-place adjoining the 
chapel. Now, however, it has been enclosed in a glass box, and placed 
on the altar of the old chapel. 

It is, unfortunately, not certain whose skull it is. The tradition of 
the family has ever been that the skull is that of the Venerable George 
Haydock, the supposition being that the martyr's cousin, William 
Hesketh, when discharged from the Fleet prison in 1582, obtained 
possession of the skull and brought it to Cottam. It was specially 
fitting that this relic should be preserved by the family who cherished 
the legend of "The Gory Head of Mowbreck Hall." 

This is thus told by Mr. Gillow, who himself claims descent from 
the Haydocks. J 



* The Hay dock Papers (London, 1 8 88), 

f He had three brothers priests, Gilbert, Cuthbert, and Hugh. 

I Haydock Papers, p. 25. 

313 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

It must be explained that Vivian Haydock, the martyr's father, 
became a priest in his old age. 

" On the hallowe'en preceding the arrest of his son George, Vivian 
Haydock stood, robed in his vestments, at the foot of the altar in the 
domestic chapel at Mowbreck, awaiting the clock to strike twelve. As 
the bell tolled the hour of midnight, the ' fugitive ' beheld the decapi- 
tated head of his favourite son slowly rising above the altar, whose 
blood-stained lips seemed to repeat those memorable words : Tristitia 
vesfra vertettir in gaudium. Swooning at the horrible apparition, the old 
man was carried to his secret chamber, and when the little children 
called on All Souls for their somas cakes, to their customary acknowledg- 
ment of 'Pray God be merciful to the suffering souls in Purgatory,' 
they added : 'God be merciful to the soul of Vivian Haydock.' His 
body was borne to its last resting-place and laid beneath the chapel at 
Cottam Hall by his son, Dr. Richard Haydock." 

In recent years, however, some doubt has been cast on this identifi- 
cation of the skull. The late Bishop Goss of Liverpool thought it to 
be the skull of an older man than George Haydock (who was only 
twenty-six at his martyrdom), and believed that it was the skull of 
William Haydock (a great-uncle of Vivian) who was a Cistercian monk 
of Whalley Abbey, and, for his alleged share in the Pilgrimage of 
Grace, was hanged in a field adjoining the Abbey, March 12, 1537, two 
days after his Abbot's execution. He was one of the senior monks of 
Whalley, and was aged about fifty-four. 

His body was allowed to hang on the gibbet, and was subsequently 
rescued by his nephew and secretly removed to Cottam Hall. Here it 
was preserved with great veneration. When the house was pulled down 
at the beginning of the nineteenth century, the skeleton was found 
concealed in the priests' hiding-place. We, however, are inclined to 
believe the family tradition that this skull is that of George Haydock, 
the young Seminary priest who laid down his life so blithely for the 
prerogatives of Peter. 

While in his desolate dungeon, he had consoled himself by carving 
on the wall the name and ensigns of the Roman Pontiff with the 
inscription, " Gregory XIII on. earth the Supreme Head of the whole 
Catholic Church,^ and though severely taken to task by the warder, he 
stoutly refused to efface it. 

At his martyrdom he rejected the advances of the Protestant 
clergyman, but begged all Catholics to pray for him. 

' There are no Catholics here present," cried one of the crowd. 

" Nay, we be all Catholics ! " shouted another. The holy man must 
have smiled as he gently replied : " Catholics I call them which cherish 



THE OLD CHAPEL AT MAWDESLEY 

the faith of the Holy Catholic Roman Church : God grant that from 
my blood there may accrue some increase to the Catholic Faith." 

" Catholic Faith," cried the Sheriff, " the devil's faith ! Drive on 
with the cart, hang the traitorous villain ! " 

When we made our pilgrimage to Mawdesley, we were permitted to 
photograph the old chapel and its treasures.* 

The picture given here shows our fellow pilgrim, the Very Rev. 
Dom Hilary Willson, O.S.B., now Prior of Fort Augustus, vested in one 
of the old vestments preserved in the Chapel sacristy, together with the 
martyr's skull, the old Gothic processional cross, the chalice and other 
treasures. I owe to him the following inventory of the chapel furniture, 
which is exceedingly interesting, as these old vestments and other 
furniture have come down to us almost intact from penal days, and 
some of them even from Pre-Reformation times. 

It was, indeed, a delightful experience to burrow in the old oak box 
which contains these treasures, and draw out, one by one, the sacred 
vestments which had been worn by generations of confessors, and doubt- 
less by many a martyr of Christ. 

There is a most interesting little library of old books also preserved 
here ; but we content ourselves with giving the inventory of the " Church 
stuff," as our fathers called it. 



INVENTORY OF CHURCH GOODS AT 
LANE END HOUSE, MAWDESLEY 

MASS VESTMENTS 

All kept in old oak chest 4 feet 6 inches X 

2^ feet, 2 feel deep, solid ends to ground. 

1. Chassuble, yellowish green ground, blue cross and pillar about 
9 inches broad, worked with conventional Gothic flower pattern in silk 
and gold thread. French shape, lengthy ; lining of coarse blue canvas 
or buckram ; cross square-edged ; pale blue binding round chasuble. 
Stole and maniple of brownish yellow velvet, very much worn, only 
2 inches broad ; canvas lining. Burse of same colour with green 
edging, quite limp ; no veil. A pall of brown stuff on upper side, 
linen below. 

2. Chasuble, dull blue, with green cross and pillar 9 inches broad; 
material seemingly cotton silk with Gothic flower pattern ; conventional. 

f This photograph of the Chapel forms the frontispiece to my Tyburn Conferences, 
second series, " Oxford, Douay, Tyburn." (Burns and Gates, 1906.) 

315 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

An effective binding all round of braid in brown, green and red ; lined 
with stout blue canvas as No. i. French shape, but broader than No. i 
quite 3 feet broad and 4 feet 6 inches long ; cross square- edged. Stole 
and maniple former of dull green silk lined with yellow canvas, latter 
of lighter green and very long, lined with blue canvas; silver tinsel 
crosses on both. Veil of very bright green silk with I.H.S. surmounted 
by cross and heart with three nails, surrounded by rays all in bright 
yellow silk; a flower pattern is worked all round the outer edge of veil 
about i inch in breadth. The veil would seem to have belonged to some 
other set. No burse. 

3. Chasuble of pale salmon-colour -ed si Ik, very much worn; the cross and 
pillar square-edged, of well-worn silver tinsel about i inch broad, worked 
on to ground material. A plain white tape-binding round edge of 
chasuble seems to have been added later. Lining of salmon-coloured 
canvas. Stole and maniple of same silk lined with yellow canvas ; white 
tape crosses, perhaps later. Veil small, 14 inches square, with small 
silk tassels at corners, and binding of gold braid one-eighth of an inch 
broad. No burse. 

4. Red chasuble, pale Gothic red flower on yellowish diaper ground, 
square-edged cross of white binding, with green and salmon-coloured 
silk pattern throughout, lined with yellow canvas. Long stole and maniple 
with shovel ends of same material as chasuble. Veil of same ; no burse. 
Marked B. All in good preservation. Generally effective. 

5 . Bright red chasuble of serge, reversible ; black serge on other side ; 
square cross on either side of different gold tinsel braid. Stole and 
maniple to match ; black and red veil, red side of duller shade than 
chasuble ; a burse, black on one side with broad silver tinsel cross ; 
reverse side is of red velvet made out of old vestment or cape with 
(sixteenth century?) fleur-de-lis and cherubim worked in silk and gold 
thread, about i foot square. Chasuble much moth-eaten. Additional 
red velvet stole and maniple, narrow; also red burse, and two red stuff 
palls with Gothic patterns ; linen below. 

6. Older black cotton-velvet chasuble, with silver tinsel cross 2 inches 
broad, cut square ; narrow white braid edging round chasuble. Stole and 
maniple to match. Veil of same material, with I.H.S., cross, and heart, in 
rayed circle. Burse of stuff not velvet ; pall of black one side and red 
stuff on the other ; the whole, save burse, reversible for red of magenta 
shade ; white edging of narrow tape, very worn and moth-eaten on red 
side. Additional pall, black silk one side, linen below with thin card- 
board ; other old cardboard stiffenings. 

7. Old black serge chasuble, stole and maniple, burse and pall ; no 
eld veil. Newer veil, stole, maniple and burse of black cloth edged 
316 




THE RELICS AT LANE END HOUSE, 
MAWDESLEY 

Photo by the author 



To face page 316 



THE OLD CHAPEL AT MAWDESLEY 

with white braid seem to have been added. Burse very large, 1 1 inches 
square, fastened with buttons. 

8. Purple chasuble (of brownish tint) with flower pattern on ground, 
cross square, 7 inches broad, of white water-lined narrow silk, braided 
edge in silk ; coarse brown buckram lining. Stole and maniple (narrow) 
and burse, all of same material with green crosses. Veil of thin silk, pale 
purple, with cross of red silk on three steps of same. 

9. White chasuble (marked B in red silk) of silky material with small 
flower pattern, in good preservation ; square cross of narrow silver braid, 
and a single-line cross down centre and arms of cross, and pillar on front. 
Long narrow stole and maniple of same material ; no veil or burse ; 
thick lining of linen. 

Albs : one, 6 feet 6 inches long, very ample, made of four breadths of 
yard-breadth linen, homespun. Neck gathered on a strong tape with 
strings, wrists also gathered on tape; very narrow hem below ; not much 
worn, only a few small holes. (See illustration.) 

Alb of homespun^ 6 feet long, ample, four breadths of yard-broad 
linen, fastened at neck with tape, button like a shoe-button and linen 
loop, and frilled. The arms of both are long, ample and shaped, being 
much broader down to elbow ; not much worn. 

Remnant of a third alb which has been cut up ; apparently shorter ; 
arms short but very broad, i foot 6 inches at arm-hole, repaired at hem 
below with piece 4 inches deep. Lighter quality of linen, same ample 
breadth, four of one yard broad. 

Girdles : two very long girdles, one of thin double cord about thickness 
of strong window-blind cord, the other of triple cord of same strength 
with large tassel. One very short girdle, only 3 feet 6 inches, of 
plaited linen with small tassels. One of plain tape, 4 feet 6 inches, 
with tassels one inch long. 

Amice : one, worn and soiled, short strings. 

Purificators : two pieces of linen, apparently purificators. 

Corporal: one linen corporal with lace edge and embroidered 
edges within, i|- inches broad; on lower portion a very quaint figure 
of Crucifixion, with Our Lady and St. John worked in silk of dark 
brownish green. The whole is 7 inches by 4 inches. This is, perhaps, 
the most interesting and valuable piece of work in the whole collection. 

Chalice and paten of pewter, very roughly made and much battered ; 
chalice 6 inches high, 2^ inches broad ; paten 3 inches in diameter ; no 
cross on foot. (See illustration.) 

Altar stones : one of brown sandstone 8 inches by 7 inches, crosses 
well incised, four i|- inches and centre one 2|- inches each way. No sign 
of a relic chamber anywhere not even in front edge, as sometimes. No 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

signs of cere-cloth, but centre cross seems to have had something like 
wax adhering to it at some time. No sign of same elsewhere. 

Second altar-stone of green Cumberland slate, 8|- inches long by 
5|- inches broad, set in old oak frame. Crosses square, with holes at 
points, and below centre cross a larger hole apparently for relics ; signs of 
wax all over stone, but little left. Stone contained in old linen cover. 

The altar in chapel has a larger modern altar-stone. 

Processional cross, head only. Very quaint figure of Crucifixion, three 
Gothic foliated ends, with emblems of four Evangelists, eagle above, 
angel below, lion on left, ox on right ; very quaint figures of Our Lady 
and St. John in separate pieces fitting into socket with cross ; above, a six- 
lobed knot with Gothic four-leaved flowers on facets ; short stem, chased, 
and back of cross also. All apparently regilded. The left arm of cross 
has been broken and roughly repaired no staff. (See illustration.) 

Cruets : four large glass cruets with double arms, would hold half a 
pint. 

Large supply host-box, 10 inches by 4 inches, with sliding lid. 
and marks of cutting hosts on lid ; two round host-boxes of boxwood 
and walnut, with I.H.S. and three nails inlaid. 

Altar-cards : one set of paper mounted on wood in deal frame 
painted black, worm-eaten and worn. Second set of paper mounted 
on cardboard with print in colours in centre card ; a triptych, the Nativity, 
Crucifixion, and Resurrection, 9 inches by 5 inches each. Initial letters 
on blue and red ground, blue border round the whole, plainest print. 
Below : a Paris chez Jacques Houeruoc (?) T(ue Saint Jacques a la ville de 
Cologne, 

Altar table, of oak, 5 feet broad, supported by two pillars 3 feet 
9 inches high, 4 feet apart. This and the back below are of old oak. 
A new front of oak with cross and gilded rays seems to have been added. 
Has two steps or gradines, 2 feet by 4 feet. Old deal tabernacle ; oak 
credence, 3 feet high, 2 feet 6 inches by I foot top. 



318 



BADDESLEY CLINTON 



1 



moated Hall of Baddesley, near Warwick, seat of a branch 
of the Ferrers family from 1517, has been so frequently 
pictured and described that we need not give it more than a 
passing notice. 

The writer feels that he cannot omit it altogether, for of all these 
forgotten shrines, Baddesley is, to him, the most familiar and the most 
dear. None is more romantic in its studied isolation, none more 
beautiful with the poetry of age. The old grey walls, reddened with 
lichen, rise from the waters of the moat with a simple dignity unsur- 
passed elsewhere; the mullioned windows, blazoned with innumerable 
heraldic shields, give light to rooms panelled in blackest oak, in whose 
dim recesses seem to lurk mysterious spirits of the past ; the dark 
winding corridors, broken by unexpected flights of slippery oaken steps, 
lead here to a priests' hiding-place, there to a banqueting hall, here 
again to a ghostly room, where the blood of a murdered priest still stains 
the floor. But the heart of the house is the old chapel where the 
Master of the house deigns to dwell in His tabernacle, and the 
haunting legend is inscribed above the door : 

transit gloria muntit : 
datfjolira manct. 



Here at Baddesley that Faith has ever had a stronghold ; never did this 
beautiful old house belong to any but a Catholic. Through the dark 
days of persecution, hidden chaplains like the "Sir William the 
priest at Badsley " revealed to us in Elizabethan documents ministered 
to the faithful, hidden away in the recesses of the great Forest of Arden. 
Here for thirteen generations of unbroken line, the Ferrers of Baddesley 
have worshipped God in the old Catholic manner during nigh four 
centuries, three of which were ages when no Catholic was suffered to 
serve his God in peace. 

The diary of Henry Ferrers, who lived more than eighty years at 
Baddesley (1549-1633), is still preserved among the Rawlinson MSS. 
at the Bodleian, and in it are to be found minute and vivid details of 
the life of a typical Catholic country squire during the fiercest period of 
the persecution. Needless to say, he did not escape arrest and imprison- 
ment, though for the greater part of his life he managed to live quietly 
at Baddesley. 

From the middle of the sixteenth century till the first quarter of 
the nineteenth, the Franciscans served Baddesley, and even yet the spirit 
of St. Francis broods over the place, for hard by the present Catholic 

31 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

church, the cloistered daughters of St. Clare live their hidden life of 
penance and perpetual intercession, and shed the fragrance of their 
virtues around. 

But there are even holier memories at Baddesley. It has one little 
link with the martyrs of Christ, which, so far as we know, has never 
yet been recorded. Rowington, the nearest village to the manor-house, 
was the home of one of the most attractive and heroic of the many 
laymen who gave their lives for the Faith in this country. 

Robert Grissold, or Greswold, was born at Rowington, probably 
about 1575. He came of a family very numerous in the district, which 
settled at Kenilworth about 1400, and spread into the neighbouring 
parishes. Robert seems to have belonged to the elder branch of the 
family, though the Greswolds of Solihull Hall were the richest and 
most distinguished. They were armigerous, and important people in the 
county. 

Robert was the son of John Grissold of Poundly End, Rowington, 
whose will, dated 1586, was proved at Worcester, April 20, 1587. In 
this will he names seven sons (including our martyr), and a daughter, 
Christian. He leaves three pounds to William Skynner, Lord of the 
Manor of Rowington, who was an ardent Catholic, and five years later 
got into trouble for harbouring a priest. At his examination one 
*'Thurstan Tubbs deposed to seeing an old man in Mr. Skynner's 
orchard reading a Latin Portesse (Breviary), and he met him with his 
Challice and Book going towards Baddesley." 

This is just where we should have expected to find him going. 

John Grissold also mentions in his will his three brothers, Robert, 
Henry, and Ambrose, with whom our martyr seems to have been staying 
when he was arrested. They were " three unmarried brethren, Catholics, 
for many years living and keeping house together." 

The will continues : "I give unto Robert my sonne 405. I give and 
bequeath unto my sonne John the table-board in ye Hall with ye sitinge 
benches." This is the John who in 1606 was so " ill-used in the Tower, 
that at one time he was reported to have died of torture." * 

The name of Grissold frequently occurs in the Recusant Rolls. In 
I 59 2 ~3 we find Robert Grissold de Rowington, yeoman, fined 40; 
Robert Grissold (perhaps our martyr), 80; Richard, Christian, Henry, 
William, and Robert Greswold, husbandmen, each, 80. This was for 
four months' recusancy. It would seem incredible, had we not the 
documentary evidence before our eyes, that men in this humble position 
should have been fined these immense sums simply for conscience' sake. 
Their cattle and goods were carried off, and sold to pay the debt. 

* Gillow, Dictionary, vol. iii. p. 53. 
320 




2 S 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

" Isabel Griswolde, widow," the martyr's mother, also appears in the 
Recusant Roll for I2th James I., and she is fined 40 for not attending 
church. She appears in the "Court Roll" for 1605 as holding "one 
messuage and one yarde * land by estimation 25 acres, and payeth rent 
yearlie." 

John Grissold was a friend of the famous Jesuit, Father John Gerard, 
who tells us that he was " an honest faithful man " who had the keeping 
of the house where Mrs. Anne Vaux lived, near London, and where it 
was supposed Father Gerard himself lodged. 

" This honest man, being taken in the beginning of the troubles, was 
first committed close prisoner to the Gatehouse, and there lodged in a 
dungeon, upon the bare ground, for the keeper (though he was earnestly 
entreated by the other prisoners) would not allow him so much as straw 
to lie on, pretending that if he had any straw to lie on, he would set on 
fire the house. 

"This man did both endure his affliction with great constancy and 
fidelity, but afterwards, when Father Gerard was taken prisoner in the 
Tower, the Commissioners, desiring to get matter against him, removed 
this man to the Tower also, and there put him to the torture with great 
extremity, and very often almost every day fora long time together, as 
we did confidently hear reported, with which and other bad usage in his 
diet, he was for a long time after like to die, and it was thought by many 
that he was dead ; and doubtless he escaped very hardly." 

Robert and John, as boys, must often have heard Mass at Baddesley, 
and their memory still seems to linger round the old house. 

Of Robert we learn from an old MS. that " he was single and upright 
in his actions, unlearned, but enlightened with the Holy Ghost. Feared 
God, hated sin, led a single life and chaste, was kind to his friends, mild 
in conversation, devout in prayer, bold and constant in professing the 
Catholic religion, and heartily loved and reverenced Catholic priests." 

He was to give, indeed, a signal proof of this. 

One of the priests who said Mass at Baddesley towards the end of the 
reign of Elizabeth was doubtless the venerable martyr, John Sugar,! of 
Merton College, Oxford, once Protestant Vicar of " Cank " (Cannock r) 
in Staffordshire. There is no more beautiful story in the Acts of the 
Martyrs than this of the old convert parson and the young man who 
served him so lovingly, and laid down his life so gladly rather than 
desert him. 

It was on July 8, in the first year of James I., on the Sunday 

* A yarde appears to mean a virgate, i.e. the fourth of a hide about thirty acres. 

t The Sugars had some interest in Rowington, where even yet a field is known as 
" Sugar's Close." But our martyr was a Staffordshire man. 
322 



BADDESLEY CLINTON 

known to our fathers as Relic Sunday, that a neighbouring magistrate, 
Mr. Burgoyne of Wroxall Priory, was stirred into unwonted activity. 
He sent a constable with a warrant to search a Catholic house (probably 
Mr. Skynner's) in Rowington for a priest who was supposed to be hiding 
there. The constable failed in his search, but probably having heard 
that Robert Grissold had been seen about with a stranger, who from his 
demeanour was supposed to be a priest, the man went on to the house of 
the old bachelor uncles, which he also searched. Here, too, he drew a 
blank, but on the road home he was more fortunate. For, on the high 
road, somewhere in the neighbourhood of Baddesley, he came upon 
Robert Grissold and the priest. 

Mr. Sugar had been making an apostolic journey in Staffordshire, 
Worcestershire, and Warwickshire, " to serve, help, and comfort the 
meaner and poorer sort of Catholics with the holy Sacraments." It may 
be that at Broadway, in Worcestershire, he had come across Robert 
Greswold, who was servant to a Mr. Sheldon there, and that Robert had 
brought him back with him to his old home. In any case, he was a 
faithful and devoted companion and guide. 

And now we come to the most touching feature of what was only too 
common an event. The constable was accompanied by Clement Grissold, 
our martyr's first cousin,* who lived at Henley-in-Arden. Though 
this young man was an apostate and informer, he had no quarrel with his 
kinsman. 

" Cousin, if you will go your way, you may," he said to him. 

" I will not," answered he, " except I may have my friend with 
me." 

"That you shall not, for he is a stranger, and I will carry him 
before Mr. Burgoyne." 

" Then," said he, " I will go with him to Mr. Burgoyne ; for he 
knoweth me very well, and I hope he will do my friend no wrong when 
he heareth me speak." 

This hope was unfulfilled, for both were committed to Warwick gaol, 
where they lay a year and more. Here, again, Robert might have escaped, 
had he wished, but " for the love of Mr. Sugar and zeal for martyrdom, 
he would not." 

At his trial a justice cried to him, " Grissold, Grissold, go to church, 
or else, God judge me, thou shah be hanged." 

" Then God's will be done ! " quoth he. As sentence was pronounced 
it was the judge who faltered and trembled. 

On the morning that they were to die (it was July 16, 1604), the 

* He was a son of George, brother of John Grissold, Robert's father. George 
Grissold's will is dated 1599; he left his lands to Clement. Clement's will is dated 16 1 1. 

3 2 3 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

priest said to his weeping friends: "Be ye all merry, for we have 
not occasion of sorrow but of joy ; for although I shall have a 
sharp dinner, yet I trust in Jesus Christ I shall have a most sweet 
supper": words that, in our own day, have inspired the poetic genius 
of Francis Thompson : 

" High in act and word each one. 
He that spake and to the sun 
Pointed ' I shall shortly be 
Above yon fellow.' He too, he 
No less high of speech and brave, 
Whose word was : ' Though I shall have 
Sharp dinner, yet I trust in Christ 
To have a most sweet supper.' Priced 
Much by men that utterance was 
Of the doomed Leonidas : 
Not more exalt than these, which note 
Men who thought as Shakespeare wrote." * 

Robert Grissold uttered words not less memorable : " Good woman, 
why do you weep ? Here is no place of weeping but of rejoicing ; for 
you must come into the bridegroom's chamber not with tears but with 
rejoicing." And when the mourner answered, " I hoped you should 
have had your life," "I do not want it now," said he, "for I should 
be loath to lose this opportunity offered me to die ; but yet God's will 
be done." 

And as he bade farewell to the prison, he left to the Catholics 
who crowded round him one last legacy of love : " Look that ye all 
continue to the end." 

The incident that follows, told by an eye-witness of the scene, has 
been painted on canvas by the present Lady of Baddesley Clinton, and 
the picture now hangs in our Abbey. 

" As he was going on foot to the gallows, one willed him to go a 
fair way, and not to follow through the mire Mr. Sugar, who was 
drawn on the sledge before him : to whom he made answer, ' / have not 
thus far followed him to leave him now for a little mire.' And so through 
the mire he went after kirn." 

And thus, praying for the King, and for all who had brought them to 
their end, the two blissful martyrs shed their blood at Warwick for their 
Lord. 

* To the English Martyrs, by Francis Thompson. By a play upon words, characteristic 
of Shakespeare's time, the Venerable John Sugar was known on the Mission as Swete. 
He was also sometimes called Cope. Rowington is in the heart of the Shakespeare 
country, and has a " Shakespeare Hall," which is said to have belonged to a near relative 
of the poet. 



BADDESLEY CLINTON 

" Lovely and comely in their life, even in death they were not 
divided." * 

This is the story that we dream of at Baddesley as we sit under the 
cedars and gaze at the old grey house, with its black oak gables, sleeping 
in the sunshine. It is all so tranquil now, the swans in the moat seem 
to be the only sign of life ; and it seems difficult to associate this " haunt 
of ancient peace " with memories of strife and blood. Yet across the 
moat we can still discern the narrow loopholes which light the subterranean 
passage by which the hunted priest escaped, and in which one famous 
Jesuit hid for three days, knee-deep in water. Even now we can visit the 
strong-room at the foot of the well-staircase in the tower, where the 
massive door can be barricaded from within, and a pulley lifts a great 
stone which gives access to the moat. 

Baddesley is now a house of memories, a shrine of golden deeds, 
forgotten by the world, but dear to the angels of God. And, sometimes, 
perchance, from the battlements of heaven, there look down with love 
and blessing upon the old house, still the abode of their King, two at 
least of that martyr army who stand in their white robes before the 
throne of God.t 

We add some lines inspired by a visit to Baddesley, and the legend 
inscribed in its chapel. 

"TRANSIT GLORIA MUNDI 
FIDES CATHOLICA MANET." 

" Home of an ancient race no prouder name 
Lives in our annals, gleams on any page 
And yet more glorious for His Love who came 
To make in thee His lowly hermitage. 

" Reared in the days of chivalry, thy halls 
Rang to mailed feet, thine oaken stairs were trod 
By knights who manned thy battlemented walls, 
And in thy chapel bowed before their God. 

" Fortress of peace, deep-planted on the rock, 
And laved with living waters evermore, 
Dear refuge of the little hunted flock, 
Who hear the Shepherd's voice, His Will adore ! 

* 2 Kings, i. 23. 

t For Baddesley, see the monograph by the late Rev. Henry Norris, F.S.A. (London, 
1897). For Venerable Robert Grissold, see J. W. Ryland's Records ofRowington (Birming- 
ham) ; Gillow's Dictionary ; Challoner, whose account is taken from a MS. written by an 
eye-witness of the martyrdom. For John Grissold, see Morris, The Condition of Catholics 
under James A, p. 181. 

325 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

" The swans gleam white upon thy lonely mere 
Girdled with golden lilies : not less white 
The souls who, spurning wealth and honours, here 
Fled from defilement, faithful to the light. 

" O worn grey stones, that yet are splashed with red 
As though with martyrs' blood, a lesson high 
Ye teach, of worldly glories long since dead, 
And of the faith of Christ that cannot die." 



326 



WASHINGLEY HALL 

A" ONG the least known of our English martyrs is the Venerable 
Robert Apreece [or Price] of Washingley Hall, Huntingdon- 
shire. So little is known of him that in the Decree of the 
Sacred Congregation (Dec. 4, 1 8 86) which proclaimed him 
and two hundred and sixty others, Venerable Servants of God, his 
Christian name is left blank, and he is entered simply as 

" Price, Layman. 1 ' 

The story of his martyrdom is thus given by Bishop Challoner : 

" 1644. This same year also, as Mr. Austin writes (under the name 
of William Birchley) in his Christian Moderator, Mr. Price, a Catholic 
gentleman, was murdered at Lincoln, in hatred of his religion. The 
story he relates thus : ' I remember an officer of my acquaintance, under 
the Earl of Manchester, told me, that at their taking of Lincoln from 
the Cavaliers, in the year 1644, he was an eye-witness to this tragedy. 
The next day after the town was taken, some of our (the Parliament) 
common soldiers, in cold blood, meeting with Mr. Price of Washingley 
in Huntingdonshire, a papist, asked him, " Art thou Price, the Papist? " 
" I am,'' said he, " Price, the Roman Catholic " ; whereupon one of them 
immediately shot him dead.' ' 

This is all that has been known till now. Thanks, however, to the 
untiring exertions of a devout client of the martyr, Mr. Joseph Fabian 
Carter of Kimbolton, we are able to add a few more particulars. In the 
first place, after a search of many years, Mr. Carter has discovered the 
martyr's Christian name, Robert. The Apreece family, according to 
Burke, settled at Washingley in the early years of the sixteenth century. 
Their name was originally ap Rhys, and they deduce their descent from 
Blethin ap Maenarch, Prince of Brecknock, who was slain in 1094 by 
Bernard Newmarch. The family continued in Wales till Einon ap Rees 
came to England, and served under Henry III. and Edward I. 

Robert ap Rees, great-great-grandson of Einon, son of Isaack ap Rees 
by Joan, sister to Sir Reginald Bray, Chancellor to Henry VII., married 
(circa 1510) Joan, daughter and heiress of John Otter of Walthamstow, 
and thus acquired the Washingley estates, which had been inherited by 
the Otters from the Wassingleys. 

His descendants were buried in the church of Luton, co. North- 
ampton, in which parish Washingley is situated. 

Robert Apreece, the martyr, was the son of Jeronimus ap Rhese, 
who set up in Luton Church certain monuments, bearing inscriptions to 

327 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

the memory of his ancestors, one of them recording? that fact, with the 
date, 1633. 

Blessed Edmund Campion stayed at Washingley Hall in the winter 
of 1580-81. The Squire at that time was Robert Apreece, whose 
monument may be seen at Luton. He was the grandfather of our 
martyr. His name is constantly found in the Recusant Rolls, and he 
suffered greatly for the Faith. 

This good man, with twdve other gentlemen, was imprisoned at Ely 
for recusancy, March 25, 1594. His sons also were put in prison for 
aiding three priests to escape from Wisbech Castle in March 1600. 
Two of the priests were future martyrs, Venerable Thomas Hunt and 
Robert Nutter. 

The monument of white and black marble, with a canopy in the 
Renascence style, supported by two marble columns, is on the Gospel side 
of the chancel, and represents Robert Apreece kneeling with folded hands, 
together with his father, William, and his grandfather, Robert, the first 
Apreece of Washingley. The three figures are of life size, presumably 
portraits, as the features and beards differ in each case. Father Campion's 
host has a very long white beard. The three figures are coloured, and 
wear dark Elizabethan costume, with gowns and white ruffs. They face 
the spectator, with hands joined in prayer, and kneel on cushions. 

Below are coats of arms, with the Apreece spear-heads, and three 
separate framed slabs of black marble, each bearing an incised inscription 
in Latin, one of which we quote in memory of the old confessor who 
received a martyr into his house, and had as a reward the grace of being 
grandsire to another martyr. 

PIAE MEMORIAE 

ROBERTI APREECE DE WASHINGLEY ARMIGERI, ROBERTI 
NEI'OTIS, REMGIONE ET MORUM CANDORE INSIGNIS, NULLI 
UNQUAM GRAVIS, OMNIBUS ACCEPTI ET EGENIS MUNIFICENTIA 
CHARI : DUCTAOUE IN UXOREM JOHANNA FILIA ET COH^EREDE 
ROBERTI WILFORD, EX QUA FILIOS NOVEM FILIASQUE SEX 
SUSCEPIT, PLENUS TANDEM VIRTUT1BUS ET BONIS OPERIBUS, 
ANNISQUE NONAGENARIUS SANCTISSIME E VITA NONO DIE 
APRIL1S MIGRAVIT, l622. 

which may be Englished thus : 

To the Pious Memory 

Of Robert Price of Washingley, Esquire, grandson of Robert, 
remarkable for his religion and the lustre of his character, harsh 
to none, popular with all, and dear to the poor through his 
328 



WASHINGLEY HALL 

liberality, who, having married Johanna, daughter and co-heiress 
of Robert Wilford, by whom he had nine sons and six daughters, 
at length, full of virtues and good works, and in years a 
nonagenarian, departed this life in the odour of sanctity, 
1622. 

Our martyr must have known this good old grandfather, whose death 
preceded his by only twenty-two years. He himself married into an 
illustrious house, for he espoused Marie, the daughter of the renowned 
Cavalier, Sir Henry Bedingfield, of Oxburgh, co. Norfolk. Marie was 
born in 1621, being Sir Henry's seventh child by Elizabeth, daughter of 
Peter Hoghton of Hoghton Tower in Lancashire.* Sir Henry Beding- 
field, by the testimony of his grandson, the second Baronet, was " tall 
and finely shaped and a handsome man, a great sportsman and kept a 
great house." 

His portrait shows that this account of his appearance was not 
coloured by the partiality of a relative, and his monument, in the 
Bedingfield chantry in Oxborough Church, declares his services to the 
royal c;iuse. 

"The i yth Knight of ye Family eminent for his Loyaltie to his 
Prince and Service of his Countrey. In the Time of the Rebellion he 
was kept three years Prisoner in ye Tower, and great Part of his Estate 
sold by ye Rebells, the rest sequestered during his Life ... he dyed 
November 22 An Dm 1657, Act. 70 and 6 months." 

The Bedingfields lost more than ,45,000 by their devotion to the 
King. Not less loyal was Robert Apreece of Washingley. He was a 
Colonel in the loyalist ranks, and helped, in 1644, to defend Lincoln 
against the rebels. 

The British Museum Library contains a very rare pamphlet, A true 
Relation of the Taking of the City, Minster, and Castle of Lincoln by the 
Right Honourable the Earl of Manchester on Monday the sixth of this 
instant May together with a list of the names of the Commanders. London, 
printed by R. Cotes for Job Bellamy, 1644.! This shows us that the 
martyrdom took place on Tuesday, May 7, 1644. 

In the list of prisoners we find the names of " Lieutenant-Colonel 
Benefield " and " Ensign James Aprice." The former was Thomas 
Bedingfield, our martyr's brother-in-law. In a petition to King Charles II. 
Colonel Bedingfield says : 

* See C.R.S. Miscellanea, VI. Bedingfield Papers, pp. 2, 36, 228, &c. 

t It is bound up in a Collection of Pamphlets, 410, bound in sprinkled leather 
(sheepskin), with red edges. Lettered, Gift of G. III. They are known as "The King's 
Pamphlets," or the Thomason Tracts. 

2T 329 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

"That your petitioner upon the advancing of your Royall Father's 
Standard, Did at his oune charge raise a Regiment of foot, and a troop of 
Horse for his service, and maintained them untill at the Storme of Lincolne 
hee was sorely wounded and taken Prisoner,and for two yeares suffered loath- 
some Imprisonment in the Common Gaole and was at lengthe Banished, his 
Father's whole estate being sold by the Usurped Power, soe as his Father 
and hee have been Damnified above three score thousand pounds." 

Ensign James Aprice was probably a younger brother, certainly a 
near kinsman, of our martyr. His own name does not appear in the 
list of prisoners. 

The pamphlet gives a striking account of the assault, which took place 
about three o'clock on the Monday morning. Six pieces of ordnance 
being fired off" as a signal, "within less than a quarter of an houre we got 
up to their workes, which the Foot with much gallantness performed, 
receiving all their shot which they poured out like haile, the Enemy being 
all ready to receive our charge, and expecting us when we came. Our 
Foot never left running till they came to the top of the Hill, which would 
have been enough to tier a Horse, being under their workes we set up 
the scaling ladders, which they seeing left their firing and threw mighty 
stones upon us over their workes by which we received more hurt than 
by all their shot ; but all would not daunt our men, but up to the top of 
the ladders they got, which proved too short, most of them, to reach the 
top of their wals and workes, they being most of them as high as London 
Wai ; but yet they shifted to get up, which the Enemy perceiving, they 
had no spirit left in them, but betooke themselves to their heels, and our 
men over their works shouting, and following as fast after them ; but 
they not knowing whether to runne, cryed out for quarter, saying they 
were poor Array men ; we slew about fifty of them, about twenty of them 
were slaine in the Castle yard, where they made the most resistance. We 
lost not more than eight men in the storming of it; whereof one a 
Captaine, Captaine Oglesby, another Lieutenant Saunders. We took of 
them as follows, a List of those Names I have here sent you, both of the 
officers and common soulders, as I see them taken, which is with the least, 
there being more found since in corners, whose names were not inserted 
into this list of Prisoners." 

Our martyr must have been concealed at the first storming of the city, 
" when all the Pillage of the upper Town was given to the souldiers," 
since he was not murdered till the next day. The pamphlet does not 
mention him. 

* There is a beautiful portrait of Colonel Thomas Bedingfield at Oxburgh. It is 
reproduced in the C.R.S. volume already referred to. 
33 



WASHINGLEY HALL 

*** He left one little son Robert, then about nine years old. The 
child was brought up a Protestant by guardians appointed by the 
State. His mother was married again, to one Humphrey Orme. The 
Apreece family in the male line became extinct in 1842, at the death of 
Sir Thomas George Apreece, second Baronet, born August 17, 1791 ; 
died in 1842, aged fifty-one. He left all his property to St. George's 
Hospital. The baronetcy was created July 12, 1782. The arms of the 




** 

family are those of their ancestors, the Princes of Brecknock : sable, 
three spears heads argent guttee de sang. The crest is a spear's head, 
as in the arms. 

The motto is a good one for a martyr : 

Labora ut in ceternum vivas* 

" Washingley Hall is still standing," writes Mr. Carter, "and to all 
appearance little altered since the martyr dwelt there. The spot is a very 
secluded one, situated about six miles from Oundle, where St. Wilfrid died, 
and some thirteen miles from Kimbolton Castle, the residence of the 
Manchester family. Edward, second Earl of Manchester, at whose men's 
hands our martyr met his death, was therefore his neighbour, and the men 
who slew him were also his neighbours, and recognised him at sight ; 
and so it seems to me the martyrdom is unique. He was slain by his 
neighbours." 

Washingley some years ago was in decay, almost a ruin ; but since 

"Labour that thou mayest live for ever." Burke, Peerage and Baronetage, 1841. 

33* 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

then the place has been thoroughly restored, and it is now again tenanted. 
The house is of brick and stone, and very secluded. There are fine yews 
in the park, and a sheet of water. Year by year in the month of May 
a family of faithful Catholics make a pilgrimage from Kimbolton to 
Washingley to beg the martyr's intercession for the conversion of their 
common country. Father and mother, brothers and sisters, they kneel 
in the fields near the Hall and recite the Rosary, and rise to sing the 
martyrs' hymn : 

" O Thou, of all Thy warriors, Lord, 

Thyself the crown and sure reward ! 

Set us from sinful fetters free 

Who sing Thy martyr's victory." 

Thus in a country where Catholics are few indeed, the memory of 
this almost unknown martyr is kept green by faithful hearts. 



332 



PEMBRIDGE CASTLE 



1 



"forgotten shrine" yields to none in interest and in 
pathos. There is surely no figure, among all the heroic and 
devoted priests who fill the pages of England's martyrology, 
more attractive and delightful than that of old Father John 
Kemble, whose simple homely life and character endear him to us with 
a special charm. 

The old man's dismembered body rests in the peaceful churchyard of 
Welsh Newton, about three miles away, but his spirit still seems to live 




at Pembridge Castle, and to welcome the rare pilgrim who finds his way 
to his old home. 

The place is romantic and beautiful in the extreme. Webb, in his 
Memorials of the Civil War in Herefordshire* has the following 
description of it : 

" The small Castle of Pembridge stands in the parish of Welsh 
Newton, about five miles from Mon mouth, whence the road to it lies 
through the narrow pass of the Buckholt, remarkable for its wild 
romantic scenery, steep rocky banks, tall woods, and rapidly descending 

* London, 1879, ii. p. 114. 

333 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

rill. After an ascent of more than three miles, a turning to the left, 
described in an ancient map, and probably not without reason, as ' the 
way to Chester,' passes by the spot in question. The form of the 
building is square, its foundation resting upon a rock, from which the 
stone for constructing it was apparently raised. It presents a fosse and 
gateway, with vestiges of a drawbridge and portcullis, and has four 
towers at the angles of its walls ; that at the north-east is in the form of 
a quadrant, its angle impinging upon the point at which the curtains 
meet. 

" Pembridge Castle commands one of those noble prospects that an 
omnipotent hand has in so many instances spread out in situations little 
seen and known. Over a beautiful tract where the Monnow winds in 
the deep green vale below, the eye leaps, as it were, at once to the distant 
mountains. From a wide hemisphere including the Clee, Malvern, and 
Hatrel hills, the Blorenge, Graig and Garway, and the heights above 
Abergavenny, each beacon that blazed in the days of border warfare 
might have been visible here. The knightly race of the Pembridges were 
more than merely famous in the local annals of this county. Sir Philip, 
the 52nd Knight of the Garter, deemed worthy of that privilege by one 
of the most splendid of our kings, as a companion of his victories in 
France, lies entombed in the Cathedral of Hereford. Their castle passed 
in after times to the Pyes of the Mynd. Its resident possessor in 1644, 
to whom the latter had sold it, was George Kemble, a gentleman, among 
the branches of whose stock, it is believed may be found the Kembles 
and Siddons of later days." 

One greater than the famous actors, however, is still remembered at 
Pembridge Castle. 

John Kemble was born at Rhydycar Farm, in the parish of 
St. Weonard's, Herefordshire, in 1599. He studied at Douay, and 
was ordained priest there February 23, 1625, and on June 4 following 
was sent to begin his long apostolate in England. 

There were few more Catholic parts of England than the Welsh 
Marches at this period. The people of Hereford and Monmouth shires 
had never taken kindly to the new religion. Great nobles, like the 
Marquis of Worcester at Raglan Castle, and almost all the landowners 
Vaughans, Blounts, Wigmores, -Pritchards, Bodenhams, Moningtons, 
Beringtons, and many others were faithful to the old Church, and 
protected the clergy who ministered to them. The Protestant Bishop 
Bennet wrote to Lord Salisbury in June 1605, of the numbers and 
" desperate courses " of the " rude and barbarous people." Three days 
before he had sent an armed party " unto the Darren and other places 
near adjoining to make search and apprehend Jesuits and Priests . . . 
334 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

and did make diligent search, all that night and day following, from 
village to village, from house to house about 30 miles compass, near 
the confines of Monmouthshire, where they found altars, images, books 
of superstition, relics of idolatry, but left desolate of men and women." 
He adds despairingly : " If we go out with few, we shall be beaten home ; 
if we levy strength, we are descried and they all are fled to the woods, 
and there they will lurk until the assizes be past." 

At this time Father Kemble was only a little boy of six years old. 
Five years later his friend and spiritual Father, the Venerable Roger 
Cadwallader, suffered a cruel martyrdom at Leominster (August 27, 
1610). 

He knew then what he might expect when he, in his turn, came 
to take up his work among his own people, and yet for many a long 
year he was left in peace. This is not the place to recount his life ; 
indeed, for the most part it was uneventful. He lived with his nephew, 
Captain Richard Kemble, at Pembridge Castle, and from that retreat 
made his missionary journeys over the wild and. beautiful country all 
around. 

Pembridge Castle is one of those old border castles, once of great 
strength and importance, but long since turned from a warrior's fortress 
into an abode of peaceful farmers. Three of the old round towers 
which guarded the inner ward still exist, as well as the old gateway in 
which the portcullis once hung. The moat still surrounds the walls, 
but only part of it is now filled with water. Within the enclosure of 
mediaeval walls and towers a sixteenth-century house shelters the modern 
occupants as it sheltered the Kembles before them. The pilgrim is 
kindly welcomed by the farmer and his family, who, though they do 
not share his faith, are proud of Father Kemble and anxious to tell all 
they know of him. 

Upstairs the martyr's room is shown, a large square room with 
windows looking on to the Castle court. Just outside this room 
is the old seat on the stairs, of which we give an illustration. It is 
known as " Father Kemble's seat," and is a curious relic of the old 
man, who was seventy-nine years old when he was arrested here at 
Pembridge and carried off to prison. No doubt in his old age he 
found the stairs a difficulty, and was glad to rest here on his ascent. 
Above, at the top of the house, is the old chapel. Here he celebrated 
Holy Mass on the altar now preserved in the Catholic church at 
Monmouth.* 

Other glorious martyrs must often have come to Pembridge to visit 

* This and his other relics there are fully described in the section on the " Relics and 
Memorials of the Martyrs." 

336 



PEMBRIDGE CASTLE 

the old man, especially Father David Lewis (or Baker), S.J., who had 
found a shelter at Raglan Castle. Not far distant was the Cwm (or 
Coombe) where the Jesuits founded an important college in 1662, which 
they held under the Marquis of Worcester. There were two houses, 
the Lower and Upper Cwm, " situated at the bottom of a thickly wooded 
and rocky hill, with several hollow places 
in the rocks wherein men may conceal 
themselves, and there is a very private 
passage from the houses into the wood."* 

Here several future martyrs stayed, 
most, if not all, of whom must have 
known Father Kemble well. 

When the Civil War broke out, the 
Catholics were all on the King's side. 
Monmouth Castle had succumbed to 
treachery, when Raglan fell on Wednes- 
day, August 19, 1646. Raglan was the 
last castle to hold out for Charles I., 
and they say that when it fell at last, 
forty priests were found within its walls. 
Loyalty and Faith went hand in hand then 
as always. 

" Colonel Birch had ordered Pern- 
bridge Castle to be slighted on April 15, 
1646, so that it was not added to the ruins scattered over the country, 
but still continued to be Father Kemble's home and the central place of 
his ministrations." f 

In 1650, a year after the death of George Kemble, the martyr's elder 
brother, the estates were sequestrated for the Recusancy of Anne Kemble, 
his widow. But they were recovered from the clutches of the Parlia- 
mentary Commissioners, and Pembridge still remained to the family. 

Captain Richard Kemble, the martyr's nephew, who succeeded, was 
Captain-Lieutenant to Lord Talbot at the Battle of Worcester, and did 
great service to the royal cause ; for when Charles II. was nearly captured 
through his horse being killed, Captain Kemble gave him his horse, and 
rallying the troops with the aid of Sir James Hamilton, charged the 
enemy gallantly in Sudbury Street and High Street. Both Captain 
Kemble and Sir James were desperately wounded in the action, but 
succeeded in effecting his Majesty's safety and escape, so that for the 

* Foley, Records, S.7., vol. ii. p. 230. 

f Father John Kemble, by R. Raikes Bromage, M.A. (London, 1902). I owe much to 
this excellent pamphlet. 

2u 337 




FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

future the Kembles changed their crest of a wolfs head on a coronet 
to that of a horse's head. 

The Catholics naturally expected to receive better treatment when 
Charles II. came to the throne, as he was the son of a Catholic mother, 
had married a Catholic wife, and could vividly remember the loyalty of his 
Catholic subjects during the whole of the Civil War, and, besides, owed 
his life to their protection. At the Restoration, therefore, Captain 
Richard Kemble tried to regain the lands that had been taken from him, 
but Charles replied that it was impossible, and offered him a knighthood, 
which Kemble refused, saying : " Plain Richard Kemble I was, and plain 
Richard Kemble I will remain." His three sons were George, Richard, 
and Roger, and from these the different branches of the family are 
sprung.* 

When the dreadful frenzy roused by Titus Gates and his pretended 
Popish plot seized the whole country a mad fury of which some results 
have lasted to our own day priests were arrested everywhere. Not the 
most proved and devoted loyalty, not the most obvious and striking 
innocence, could save them then. 

The Cwm was sacked, of course, and though the Fathers had escaped 
with most of their altar furniture and vestments, the searchers found the 
altar-stone and a few sacred objects hidden in the woods. The records 
of the College were also discovered, together with many books, some 
of which are still to be seen in the Cathedral Library at Hereford. Res 
clamat domino is a principle that does not seem to be understood there. 

The Bishop of Hereford at this time was Dr. Herbert Croft, who had 
himself been educated at Douay, where his father, Sir Herbert Croft, 
had in his old age joined the English Benedictines. Yet he was not a 
whit behind his Episcopal brethren in hunting down the unhappy priests 
in his diocese. 

On December 7, 1678, he was ordered by the Council to search for 
priests, and he put the matter in the hands of Captain Scudamore of 
Kentchurch, who hunted down Father David Lewis, whom he sent to 
Monmouth Gaol, and then proceeded to Pembridge Castle to arrest 
Father Kemble. 

The old man, being greatly beloved in the district, was urged to hide 
or escape, but refused, saying that as he had but few years to live, it 
would be an advantage to him to suffer for his religion. So when 
Scudamore's men came thundering at the gates of the old Castle, the 
aged priest calmly gave himself up. 

He was carried off through the snow to Kentchurch Court, the fine old 
house of the Scudamores, which still exists in good preservation, and 

* R. Raikes Bromage, op. cit. p. 13. 
338 



PEMBRIDGE CASTLE 

still belongs to the family. Here he was among friends, for Mrs. 
Scudamore and her children were Catholics, and were devoted to the old 
man. It must have been a bitter grief to them to see him thus made 
prisoner by their own nearest relative. Kentchurch Court is only six 
miles from Pembridge Castle. 

Next day he was carried off to Hereford Gaol, a fifteen miles' journey.* 

" The Governor of the Gaol evidently had a great respect for his 
prisoner and took a pen-and-ink sketch of him, which still exists. His 
devoted relatives and friends also determined to have a good picture of 
the martyr, and procured the services of one of the best artists of the 
time. This beautiful oil-painting is now in the keeping of Mrs. Clarkson 
of Highgate, who is one of the Catholic descendants of the family." f 

Father Kemble, while patiently awaiting his crown, devoted himself 
to ministering to and encouraging the crowds of the faithful who flocked 
to the prison. Among them were Captain Scudamore's children, who 
often came to visit their old friend. He received them with special 
kindness, and treated them to the dainties which other friends had sent 
him. When asked why he so kindly petted his captor's children, he 
answered, " Because their father is the best friend I have in the world." 

On April 23, 1679, the House of Lords ordered that the old priest 
should be brought up to London. On his journey to London and back 
he suffered terrible agony (" more than a martyrdom," Challoner says), 
from extreme old age and from a disease which would not permit him to 
ride except sideways. It is said that he was strapped like a pack to his 
horse on the way there, and that he was allowed to walk most of the 
journey back. 

Nothing came of this cruel proceeding, for neither Oates nor Bedloe 
ventured to implicate him in the fictitious plot. In Newgate prison he 
met a crowd of confessors, for the gaols were full to overflowing with 
the victims of these infamous apostates. Probably he had the holy 
Jesuit, Father David Lewis, as his companion to and from London. This, 
at least, must have been a comfort to him.J 

At the Summer Assizes held in the old Town Hall of Hereford, 
before Chief Justice Scroggs, our martyr was indicted for saying Mass at 
Pembridge Castle, and was, of course, condemned. 

No shadow of evidence connected him with any treason, and it seemed 
incredible that the cruel sentence could be carried out. Popular sympathy 

* The story of Father Kemble is told in Archdeacon Coxe's Monmouthshire, and by 
Webbe, Memorials of the Civil War, vol. ii. p. 118. 

f R. Raikes Bromage, op. at. p. 26-27. 

j From an excellent article on " Herefordshire Martyrs," by the Right Rev. Prior 
Ildefonsus Cummins, O.S.B. Amfleforth Journal, vol. x. 

339 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

in Hereford went out to the innocent old man, whose blameless life and 
kindly disposition endeared him to all that knew him. Efforts were 
made to prevent the judicial murder, but the roused passions of the puritan 
mob demanded victims, and Father Kemble was left to his doom. . . . 
An anecdote which has a very modern sound will touch a sympathetic 
chord in many breasts. Father Kemble loved his pipe ! He is probably 
the only or the earliest Venerable Servant of God who indulged in the habit 
of smoking. Lovers of tobacco are badly in want of a patron saint: they 
may find one some day in the holy missioner who, tramping footsore 
among his scattered flock, or resting peacefully by some friendly fireside, 
must have often found solace in his pipe. During his last days in prison 
he and the governor of the gaol used to smoke their pipes together ; 
and when the hour of his death was announced and they came to carry 
him to execution, he requested time to finish his prayers, and then to be 
allowed one last pipe of tobacco. The request was readily granted, the 
Under-Sheriff (Mr. Humphrey Digges) smoking another. When the 
blessed martyr had finished his prayers and his pipe, he took a cup of 
sack, and said he was ready to go. The incident gave rise to a local 
custom, once common, of calling the parting smoke " a Kemble pipe." * 

In the evening of August 22, 1679, the cruel sentence was executed. 
He was strapped to a hurdle and dragged out to the public race-course, 
called Wigmarsh, or Widemarsh, Common, just outside the city. The 
place of execution is traditionally handed down as near the trees at the 
north-west corner, where the Leominster road leaves the Common. 

He met his fate with fortitude and dignity. His last words to the 
crowd were taken down, and were subsequently printed. They were like 
himself, simple, straightforward, and Christian : 

" It will be expected I say something, but as I am an old man it cannot 
be much, not having any concern in the plot, neither, indeed, believing 
there is any : Gates and Bedloe not being able to charge me with anything 
when I was brought up to London, though they were with me, makes it 
evident that I dye only for professing the old Roman Catholick Religion, 
which was the Religion that first made this Kingdom Christian ; and who- 
ever intends to be saved must dye in that Religion. I beg of all that 
either by thought, word, or deed I have offended, to forgive me, for I 
do heartily forgive all those that have been instrumental or desirous of 
my death." 

" Honest Anthony, my friend Anthony," he said to the hangman, 

* In Hawkins's edition of Izaak Walton's Compleat Angler is a very curious account, 
in a note, of Father Kemble's last pipe. The writer confuses the martyr (who was a 
contemporary of Walton's) with the Protestants who suffered under Queen Mary Tudor ! 
34 




THE SERMON AT THE PILGRIMAGE TO FATHER 
KEMBLE'S GRAVE, 1909 

The martyr's grave is marked by flowers. The slab beside it coven the 
grave of Catharine Scudamore, who was miraculously cured while 
praying at the martyr's tomb. Photo by G. C. Miers 



To face page 340 



PEMBRIDGE CASTLE 

" be not afraid ; do thy office ; I forgive thee with all my heart. Thou 
wilt do me a greater kindness than discourtesy." 

And so the old man, after some quiet time spent in prayer, sweetly 
and patiently met his death. His last words were those of our Blessed 
Lord In manus tuas, Domine, commendo spiritum meum. And thus he went 
to meet the Lord he loved. 

The dismembered body of the martyr was buried in Welsh Newton 
churchyard by his nephew, Captain Kemble, who erected the flat stone 
over it with the inscription : " J. K., who dyed Augt. 22nd, 1679," and 
a large cross outlined on the full length of the stone. It seems certain 
that the holy body still rests in ihis humble grave. The late Rev. 
Thomas Abbot, for fifty years Catholic Rector of Monmouth, wrote as 
follows to the author : 

" I attended an aged Catholic named Watkins of Slangrove Common, 
who was born in 1752, and used to go to Mass at Pembridge Castle, and 
visit the tomb on his way, and he never heard any talk of the body 
having been removed. I also attended another of the name of Hull who 
had looked after the tomb, and had repaired it, when broken, with an iron 
clamp; and after his death, for about fifty years, I have looked after the 
tomb and kept it in repair. It has been, and is, visited annually. I 
attended an old woman, a Mrs. Stead, who told me she remembered 
Mrs. Siddons (nee Kemble) at Monmouth with her company of play- 
actors, in 1805. She went to visit the tomb with her brother, and said 
she claimed to be descended from the Kemble family, and was more proud 
of the holy Father Kemble than if she had been descended from Royalty. 
She composed a poem on her visit to the tomb. A recent version of these 
verses was published with some three or four stanzas added to Mrs.. 
Siddons' composition." 

Welsh Newton is situated on the Hereford Road, three miles from 
Monmouth and about the same distance from Pembridge Castle. The 
church is a tiny structure dating from Norman times, though most of its- 
walls above the foundations now belong to the Early English period. It 
has a dwarf spire of stone. The interesting stone rood-screen of three 
arches still remains, and beneath it, at the entrance to the chancel, lies 
an old altar-stone. The martyr's tomb is bright with flowers, and is. 
surrounded by the resting-places of old-time Catholics, who longed when 
living for the assurance that their bodies after death should be laid to rest 
close to the relics of the old Douay priest. Father Kemble's tomb has. 
been cleansed a little of late, and the stonework beneath the slab has been 
repointed, but all the original features remain intact. It is close to the 
churchyard cross. Here, year by year, a devout band of pilgrims comes 

34 1 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

in procession to keep the martyr's anniversary and invoke his intercession. 
For two hundred years and more this pilgrimage has continued, and the 
strange sight may then be seen of Catholics kneeling in a Protestant 
churchyard, reciting the Rosary and other prayers. A sermon is often 
preached from the steps of the churchyard cross (in 1909 the present 
writer had the honour of preaching it), which overshadows the martyr's 
grave. 

Beside his tomb is a slab which covers the body of Catharine 
Scudatnore, a near relative of the martyr's captor, who recovered her 
hearing as she prayed at the grave on the occasion of one of these 
pilgrimages. This miracle was testified to by Bishop Matthew 
Pritchard, O.S.F., Vicar-Apostolic of the Western District, who "with 
three or four of the family of Perthyre " (i.e., of the Franciscan 
Community there), was present on the occasion, as he wrote to Bishop 
Challoner. The daughter of Captain Scudatnore had previously been 
cured of a malignant sore throat by putting to her neck the cord with 
which the martyr had been hanged. 

The other relics of Father Kemble are described elsewhere. Father 
Abbot informed me that the chalice was stolen at the time of the martyr's 
apprehension, but the altar, and the small missal, bearing the date 1623, 
with some of his handwriting in it, remained at Pembridge Castle till 1839, 
and were used by his predecessors, at the eight Indulgence times, for the 
convenience of the neighbouring Catholics, till the Townley family of 
Burnley sold the old castle and estates to a Welsh ironmaster. Father 
Abbot then removed the precious relics to Monmouth.* 

The reredos which now surmounts the altar was made by Father 
Abbot out of an old oak bedstead from Perthyref on which Bishop Matthew 
Pritchard died in 1750. 

Let us close this account of the venerable martyr with the words of his 
old biographer : 

" The Protestants that were spectators of the exit acknowledged 
that they never saw one die so like a gentleman, and so like a Christian." 

* Webbe has a note as follows : 

" An annual midnight Mass is still celebrated at the grave of the Rev. John 
Kemble (!) It has been reported that Captain Scudamore committed suicide. . . . When 
Morgan, the last Roman Catholic tenant of Pembridge Castle, left the farm, he took with 
him the key of the chapel, to be delivered to none but a priest. The altar and 
candlesticks are still at Scatterford near Coleford. Many Herefordshire houses were 
provided with a fish-pond : there were several at the Castle which were not drained till 
the present century (Memorials of the Civil War in Herefordshire, vol. ii. p. 428). 

f Perthyre is about one and a half miles from Welsh Newton, and three from Pem- 
bridge Castle. In 1758, we find that a Franciscan from Perthyre said Mass one Sunday in 
the month at Pembridge Castle. (Thaddeus, The Franciscans in England, London 1898, 
P- 175)- 
342 




THE ALTAR, CHALICE, MISSAL, AND MISSAL-STAND 
OF THE V. JOHN KEMBLE 

Now preserved in the Catholic Church, Monmouth To face page 342 



THE CHAPEL OF ST. AMAND AND 
ST. JOHN BAPTIST AT EAST HENDRED 

f "^HIS chapel, which, like that of Stonor in the adjoining county, 
has never been alienated to Protestant uses, stands in the 
Manor of Arches at Hast Hendred, in Berkshire. 
-A. East Hendred is one of those charming old-world villages 

which lie in the neighbourhood of Wantage, at the foot of the Downs. 

" With its Manor House in the heart of the village, elms that have 
grown to an extraordinary stateliness in that sheltered nook, streets that 
have ancient names, the virgate of land that is still called Paternoster,* 
grass terraces testifying to the linen industry of days gone by, its half- 
ruined wayside chapel of the Carthusians, its grand Anglican church, an 
' Elizabethan farm-house ' (once doubtless occupied by Benedictine 
monks and farmers), and a modern Roman Catholic chapel in pure and 
severe Gothic, East Hendred is a village of no ordinary attraction to 
the mere passer by. For its history, too, East Hendred is well worthy 
of a monograph. . . . The private chapel, which is the glory of the 
house, has stood there since the thirteenth century at least. There it 
stands still, having an entrance for the congregation from the grounds, 
and a private entrance from the squire's library, with the sacred lamp 
burning in front of the altar, as it has continued to burn for more than 
six hundred years. There, every day, is held such office of prayer and 
praise as the Roman Catholic Church prescribes, and there the consider- 
able Roman Catholic population of East Hendred attends with a 
regularity that might put professing Protestants to shame. A very 
plain building is this, with walls of enormous thickness, a gallery for the 
Eyston family, and a few fragments of ancient glass carefully preserved, 
besides some stone figures in the vestry. Still, on him who shall enjoy 
the rare privilege of entering it, even though he should be of another 
form of faith, the simple dignity of the edifice must needs impress a 
feeling of reverence deeper than comes from presence within many 
a more majestic church. Six hundred years at the least that is a long 
time ; for six hundred years and more, through good report and evil 
report, in the days when Rome was all-powerful and persecuting, in the 
time of her humiliation and of her persecution ; when the Squire of 
Hendred was the unquestioned head, so far as layman might be, of a 
Roman Catholic community ; when the Squire of Hendred must flee to 
remote Catmore for safety and the consolations of his religion ; and now 

* Because the tenant held it on the terms of saying, so many times a day, a Paternoster 
for the souls of the King's ancestors. Another instance is at Pusey in the same county. 

343 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

in happier times of toleration, this little chapel has stood, inviolate, to be 
the centre for a religious life of varying intensity and volume. It has 
never, say the Eystons, I am told, been ' desecrated,' that is to say, no 
Protestant service has ever been held in it ; and there are those who 
resent the word ; but surely to know all is to pardon all, and Eystons, 
who have grown to manhood in the atmosphere of this chapel, who have 
heard how their forefathers suffered for their Faith, may well be pardoned 
for using such a word in such a connection, because it is so very easy 
to understand their attitude. . . . 

"Surely, then, it must be a small mind for that matter, there is no 
Jack of such that fails to perceive something of dignity and of pathos 
in this survival of a Roman Catholic family, and of no inconsiderable 
Roman Catholic community of good citizens, in the very heart of rural 
England ; and there will be many to whom it will be joy to learn that 
the little and ruined chapel [of the Carthusians] in the middle of the 
village has been acquired by Mr. Eyston, and will be treated with due 



reverence. 



This long extract from a charming modern book * will, we hope, be 
forgiven us, in consideration of the extraordinary interest of the subject. 
If not entirely accurate in every detail, it gives a sympathetic and 
touching picture of a place that to Catholics is a very holy of holies. 

The Eyston family have been settled at East Hendred since the 
fifteenth century, but they derive their title by marriage from the 
ancient Lords of the place, the de Turbervilles, who owned the Manor in 
the thirteenth century, if not earlier. 

On May 10, 1256, Sir John de Turberville, Knight, obtained 
permission from Pope Alexander IV. to build a chapel on his estate at 
East Hendred, provided the Bishop of Salisbury (then Giles de Bridport) 
should consider it expedient.! 

The Chapel must have been built very soon after, as it had been in 
existence some time previous to 1291, when it was entered in the 
Taxatio Ecclesiastica of Pope Nicholas IV. Two years later Bishop 
Nicholas Longspee of Sarum granted his consent to annexing the tithes 
of the Manor of East Hendred (afterwards known as the Manor of 
Arches), for the use of the Chapel and the support of the Chaplain. 

The Chapel is usually known as the Chantry of St. Amand (or St. 

* Highways and Byways in Berkshire, by James Edmund Vincent (London, 1906), 
pp. 217-21. 

t The Pope's Bull is copied on the margin of the Register of Bishop Hallam (1408- 
1 4 I 7)> f- 33- A dispute as to the tithes having arisen in this Bishop's time between the 
Chaplain and the Rector of the Parish, Bishop Hallam investigated the origin and 
foundation of the Chapel. 

344 




2 X 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Amen), but sometimes as the Chantry of St. John Baptist. St. Amand is 
nowadays little known in England, but is very popular in Belgium. 
He was a Benedictine monk, who founded a famous Abbey which still 
bears his name, near Tournai, where he died, A.D. 675. He is known 
as the Apostle of Flanders, and the chief field of his missionary labours 
was the city of Ghent. Here he founded two abbeys long famous 
in Belgium : St. Bavon, which subsequently became the Cathedral, and 
St. Pierre de Mont-Blandin. In 649 he was created Bishop of Maes- 
tricht, but resigned his see a few years later in favour of St. Remaclus. 
The Sarum Breviary kept his feast on February 6, together with 
St. Vedast. 

It is strange that St. John Baptist should be put second to 
St. Amand, in the dedication of this Chapel. 

From the Turbervilles the manor passed to the Arches family at the 
end of the thirteenth century, by the marriage of Amice, daughter of 
Sir Richard de Turberville, to William de Arches. It then became 
known as the Manor of Arches. Ralph de Arches of " Esthenrette '' 
(who died between 1418 and 1422) left an heiress, Maud, who married 
John Stowe of Burford, co. Oxon, Esquire ; he died 1436-7, leaving 
also an heiress, Isabel, who married John Eyston, ancestor of the 
Eystons of the present day. Thus the Eystons are descended, in the 
female line, from the original builder of the Chapel. In the reign of 
Edward VI. the glebe and tithe of the Chapel were seized by the 
Crown, and after a time annexed to the King's Manor of East Green- 
wich ; subsequently they passed through various hands, and have been 
permanently alienated from the service of the Church. A house called 
St. Amand's still stands on the old glebe-land, and proclaims by its 
name its real and lawful possessor. The Chapel, however, was never 
seized, although, from the reign of Edward VI., it remained for a long 
period desolate and unused, and in process of time was even converted 
into a wood-house. 

We have the following account of it from a MS. of Mr. Charles 
Eyston (who died November 5, 1721). He wrote these notes in 1718 ; 
they are still preserved in the family.* 

"... The Chappell before it was repaired had a broaken Pavement 
w ch by the remainder one might see were a sort of Dutch Tyle. Some 
part of the Altar was left till then also standing, but it was onely of 
small moultering stones, on which the Reall altar stone stood, and not 
above a foot and an halfe high, so this remainder being lookt upon to bee 
worne out and uselesse, it was thought necessary to make the altar quite 

* Mr. Eyston was a great friend of the eminent antiquary, Thomas Hearne of 
Oxford. 

346 



CHAPEL OF ST. AMAND AND ST. JOHN BAPTIST 

anew of wood and to pave it quite anew ; for I saw some of the Stones 
w ch belonged to the Altar and some of the Pavements when handled 
moulter to Earth and Sand. 

" There was a Partition in the Chappell before it was repaired, the 
bottom of it was oaken wainscot, and the Topp was in ye same nature 
as the windowes now are in the Chappell Chamber." 

Mr. Eyston also gives a most interesting account of the restoration of 
the Chapel to Catholic worship in the reign of James II. We give it in his 
own words, for he was an eye-witness of the events which he chronicles. 
It is indeed touching to think of these brave Catholics, once they were 
granted a moment's breathing-space from cruel persecution, proceeding 
with joy and jubilation once more to consecrate to God the beloved Chapel 
in which their fathers had worshipped. Strange, too, it is to read of a 
Catholic Dean of Christ Church being present at the unique ceremony, 
when the sons of St. Francis, so many of whose brethren had been 
martyred during that very century, met once more in peace to hallow the 
house of God and St. Amen. Stranger yet to think of the quiet courage 
with which, even after the usurpation of the Prince of Orange had dashed 
Catholic hopes, the Eystons met day by day within those hallowed walls 
to offer the sacrifice of peace. 

" My father, George Eyston, Esquire, began the Kepaire of this 
Chappell on Wednesday in Easter weeke in ye yeare 1687, w ch happened 
to bee that yeare on the 3Oth of March. And it was completely finisht 
on the 17 of September yt yeare, one Andrew Bartlet painted and guilded 
it and had 42 pounds for doeing it as appeares yet by his Bill and 
acquittance w ch are to be found amongst the Papers which belong to the 
Chappell. 

"Saturday, September 24, 1687, Father Pacificus, alias Philip Price 
(who then lived in the Family) a Franciscan Fryer, and one who after- 
wards was twice Provincial of his order, blessed the altar stone, being 
assisted by Father Francis, alias Wm. Hardwick, Father John Baptist, 
alias Wm. Weston, two of the same order. After that was done, vespers 
were said with as much solemnity as the Place would allow. The day 
following, being Sunday the 25th of September, there were seaven Priests 
who said Mass in it. The Priests were Mr. Price who said the first, 
Mr. Prosser and Mr. Evans two clergy Priests, Mr. Francis Hildesley, 
Soc. Jesu, Mr. Anthony alias Francis Young, Mr. Weston above named 
and Mr. Hardwick, the 3 last were Franciscan Fryers. 

"The company who were here at the opening of the Chappell were 
Sir Henry More of Fawley and his Family, Sir John Courson and his 
first Lady, Mr. John Massey actually then Deane of Christ Church in 
Oxon, Mr. Robert Charnock, and one Mr. John Augustin Bernard, the 

347 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

former Fellow of Maudeline College, and the latter Fellow of Brazen- 
nose College in Oxford, Mr. Perkines of Ufton, Mr. Perkines of Been- 
ham, Mr. Hildesley of little Stoake and his brother Martin, Mr. Francis 
Hide Junior of Pangboan, Father to the present Mr. Hide, and some 
other Catholick gentlemen came hither for the service in the morning. 
But onely Sir John Curson and his Lady, and my uncle Bar. Winchcomb 
and his first wife were at the Consecration of the Altar Stone the day 
before. 

" And the yeare following there were meanes found to have both the 
altar and the Chappell privileged : as may be scene by the Bulls w ch are 
amongst the writings w ch relate to the Chappell. 

" From the time of its being opened till the Prince of Orange came 
in, and invaded the Nation, the Chappell was open to all Commers and 
goers. The Blessed Sacrament constantly kept w th a Lamp burneing, 
Mass dayly celebrated in it. But when he and his army past over the 
Golden Myle,* some loose Fellowes (whether by orders or not I cannot 
tell) came hyther, went into the Chappell, pretended to mock the Priest 
by supping out of the Chalice, w ch they would have taken away had it 
been silver, as they themselves afterwards gave out. However, haveing 
torne doune the JESUS MARIA from the altar, w ch holy names were 
painted upon Pannels on the same Frames, where the JESUS MARIA are 
now wrought in Bugles, they retired, takeing an old suite of Church 
Stuffe with them to Oxford, where they drest up a mawkin with it and 
set it up there on the Topp of a Bon-Fyre. 

"This happened on Monday December the iith, 1688, and this is 
all the mischief they then did, besides breakeing the Lamp and carrying 
away the Sanctus Bell. Mass from that day ceast there till Monday 
June 24th, 1689, when Mr. Weston above mentioned by accident fortuned 
to bee here, and then he sayd Mass in it againe, and from that time till 
now i.e. August, 1718 wee have generally used it." 

The chapel remained in this condition till the end of 1 808, when 
some alterations were made by Basil Eyston, Esq., and stained glass was 
put into some of the windows. 

In 1845 the Chapel, being found too small for the congregation 
attending it, was lengthened, an addition of about ten feet taken from 
the Manor House being thrown into it at the west end. 

More extensive alterations were made in 1862, under the direction 
of Mr. C. A. Buckler, who left the Chapel in the state in which we now 
see it. 

A new roof was made, and a new buttress on the south side added. 
The decorated east window and the two lancets, north and south, were 

( The most eastern of the three roads in the parish which leads to the Downs. 
348 




a 
w 



Q 
Z 



! 



CHAPEL OF ST. AMAND AND ST. JOHN BAPTIST 

left intact, but a new decorated window was added on the south side, 
and two new square-headed windows above it, in place of the former 
windows " which corresponded badly with the original architecture of 
the chapel." A small trefoil window was opened at the east end just 
below the roof. A new stone altar was erected, with oak reredos. 

A recess was made in the north wall of the sanctuary in which an iron 
safe was placed for the safe-keeping of the Blessed Sacrament. This 
recess was fitted with outer door of oak and canopy of stonework, and 
thus forms a " Sacrament-house " such as are often met with in Germany 
and Belgium. It is rare to find one in England, though they exist in the 
old churches of Scotland. In the east window are figures by Hardman 
of St. Amand and St. John the Baptist. The most remarkable piece of 
stained glass is, however, in the north lancet. This represents the mono- 
gram H.F. and crozier of the Blessed Hugh Cook (or Faringdon), last 
Abbot of Reading, martyred by Henry VIII. The Abbots of Reading 
held lands at East Hendred, and there was a monastic grange or cell in 
the village. 

The chapel was reopened and the new altar consecrated by Bishop 
Grant, of Southwark, August 30, 1862. 

Besides the virgin chapel of "St. Amen," there are other precious 
relics at East Hendred. The Eystonsare descendants of Blessed Thomas 
More, and have the joy of possessing relics of him, including a portrait, 
"a Holbein which there seems to be no reason to doubt," a copy of the 
great family group of which the original sketch is preserved at Basle, 
" and more than one rare print of the one Roman Catholic martyr to 
conscience who has an unquestioned place in the heart of every English- 
man. Very curiously interesting it is to note in these portraits the 
difference between the expression of More's face in youth, and that of 
the same features in his sorely tried middle age. More's drinking-cup 
is there too, and a portrait of Cardinal Pole, and the stick on which 
Fisher, the Cardinal Bishop of Rochester, leaned as he walked to the 
scaffold at the Tower, exactly a fortnight before More met his fate at 
the hands of Henry VIII. 's headsman." * 

We give an illustration of the drinking-cup. It is of dark wood 
bound in silver rims, with a lid. It has an inscription on one of the rims : 
" The drinking-can of Sir Thomas More, sometime Lord Chancillor of 
England." 

The relics came to the Eystons in the following way : 

The last male descendant of Blessed Thomas was the Rev. Thomas 
More, S.J. ; through him the More relics preserved at Stonyhurst came 
to the Society. He died May 20, 1795, aged seventy-one. 

* Vincent, op. cit. p. 221. 

349 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

His two brothers predeceased him. He had also three sisters, one 
of whom, Catherine, died unmarried ; another, Mary (in religion, 
Augustina), became a nun, and subsequently Prioress, at the English 
Convent, Bruges, to which she bequeathed a very precious relic of the 
martyr, a vertebra of his neck. Blessed Thomas More's rosary-ring, 
now in possession of Mr. Charles Trappes, also belonged to her. The 
third sister, Bridget, was twice married, and her descendants now repre- 
sent the More family. By her first husband, Peter Metcalfe of Gland- 
ford Briggs, co. Lincoln, she had a son, Thomas Peter Metcalfe. He 
had a son and a daughter by his marriage with Teresa Throckmorton. 
The son, who assumed the name and arms of More, died unmarried ; 
the daughter, Maria Teresa, married Mr. Charles Eyston of East 
Hendred, the grandfather of the present Squire. 

She brought him not only the relics, but also the More estate of 
Barnborough, which came to the martyr's son by his marriage with the 
heiress of the Cresacres. The estate was, however, sold at Mr. Eyston's 
death. 

Thus we leave with reluctance the beautiful and romantic village ot 
which there is still much that deserves to be told. It is, indeed, a place of 
pilgrimage to all who love the past.* 

* I have to express ray gratitude to Mr. Eyston for the loan of his father's MS. history 
of the Chapel of St. Amand, from which I have taken most of the facts here set down. 



35 




L. 



THE DRINKING-CAN OF BLESSED THOMAS 
MORE, PRESERVED AT EAST HENDRED 

To face page 350 



BURGHWALLIS HALL 

A OTHER home of the ancient faith connected with a martyr is 
Burghwallis Hall, near Doncaster, the Yorkshire home of 
the Annes. The Venerable John Anne (called Amyas on 
the Mission) suffered at York, March 15, 1588-9. 
Dr. Champneys, who was a witness of the martyrdom, was very 
greatly impressed by the meekness and constancy shown by the blessed 
man and his fellow martyr, Venerable Robert Dalby. At their trial 
" one Bramley, a felon, saw hanging over their heads a great round 



i..' Ma!, 




light which every time they spake would, 
as it were, move itself, and at the end 
of their speeches vanish away." This 
converted the man, and he died with the 
martyrs, a good Catholic and sincere 
penitent. 

John Anne " had been a married 
man and dwelt in Wakefield, a great 
occupier of cloth ; and when his wife died' he gave his children portions 
and placed them well, and then went over sea to his book, and so pro- 
fiting in virtue took holy orders, and then returning into the vineyard 
did much good." 

When the judge taunted him at the trial with being " a bankrupt 
and an inferior man " the martyr gently answered : " Not so ; I am a 
gentleman by birth, of an ancient house, and when I gave up my trade I 
was able to live with the best." * 

John Anne was born at Frickley, some five miles from Burghwallis, 
then the residence of the Annes. His father was Martin Anne, and his 
mother Elizabeth Nevile, widow of Thomas Bosvile of Ardsley, Yorks. 



From FatherGrene's MS. " F." quoted by Foley, vol. iii. p. 45. 



351 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

The Hall at Frickley no longer exists. It was a moated dwelling,, 
destroyed by fire some hundred and fifty years ago. The ancient 
family chapel has also very nearly disappeared, only very insignificant 
ruins now marking the place where, for some hundreds of years, Mass 
had been offered up. 

But Burghwallis, where the martyr's sister lived, still happily remains. 
The present lady of the house, Mrs. Anne, has kindly furnished the 
following account of her home : 

" Burghwallis Hall (anciently Burgh Wallis) was built in the 
fourteenth century, and has been added to from time to time. It has 
been the property of the Annes for more than 400 years, and has had 
a Catholic mission attached to it ever since the venerable parish church 
was taken out of the rightful owners' possession, in the sixteenth century. 

" The Hall was formerly a picturesque gabled manor house with the 
large Hall and heavily timbered root found in those early days, and the 
fine old ceiling with its oak beams is still to be seen running through 
the main part of the older portion of the building. 

"Sir William Gascoign was living at Burghwallis in 1440, and, in 
the sixteenth century, Francis Gascoign married Elizabeth, daughter of 
Martin Anne of Frickley, while about the same time George Anne, son 
of the same Martin Anne, married Margaret Fenton, only child or 
Richard Fenton, then resident at Burghwallis. This Elizabeth and 
George Anne were half-sister and half-brother to the Venerable John 
Anne. 

"By inquisition post-mortem of John Anne (36 Henry VIII.) it was 
found that he held the manor of Frickley of William Gascoign as of his 
manor of Burgh Wallis. In Bernard's survey, 1577, Martin Anne is 
returned as holding the manor of Frickley of Leonard West, Esq. (who 
was a younger son of Lord De la Warr, married to Barbara Gascoign} 
as of his manor of Burgh Wallis. 

"From that time onward Burghwallis has belonged to the Annes, 
and when Michael Anne sold Frickley in the eighteenth century it finally 
became the family residence. 

"It is believed that there was a chapel in some sequestered spot at 
Burghwallis, erected almost immediately after the ejection of the Catholics 
from their churches, for an old door, now belonging to one of the 
cottages on the estate, is still spoken of as < the door of the old chapel/ 
No vestige of any building, however, remains. In the hidden chapel, 
wherever it may have been, the Venerable martyr will often have 
celebrated Mass, and we may suppose that he wore those very vestments 
which now lie tattered and stained with age in the drawers of the Sacristy, 
and used the old Missal printed at Antwerp in 11:76 
352 



BURGHWALLIS HALL 

"In Hunter's Deanery of Doncaster we find : ' The family of Anne 
never complied with the terms of the Reformation of Religion, and have 
borne their share of the losses and disabilities to which the professors of 
the Roman Catholic faith have been exposed. There was an ordinance of 
Parliament, November 18, 1652, for the sale of the estate of Philip Anne 
of Burgh Wallis, for treason against the Parliament and people. But if 
the Annes' attachment to a profession of Christianity which was dis- 
countenanced by the Court and unpopular with the multitude, may have 
prevented them from being advanced to honours and distinctions, to which 
their fortune, and still more their high ancestorial pretensions, might be 
said to entitle them, it may have contributed also to keep them out of 
the way of accidents, to which families mixing more in public affairs are 
exposed. It is a remarkable fact that this Catholic family is the single 
instance of the male line being maintained in its ancient port and rank, 
out of all the gentry of this deanery summoned to appear before the 
Heralds in 1584.' 

" In the house are many treasures relating to the past. One is a portrait 
of George Leyburne, President of Douay College from 1652-1670; the 
other is a beautiful oil-painting of Bishop John Leyburne, the first Vicar- 
Apostolic, who on being sent by the Pope to England, lost no time but 
went at a gallop through the northern counties, and confirmed 20,000 
people in two months. These portraits came to the Annes through 
Miss Elizabeth Anne, whose mother was related to the Leyburnes 
Elizabeth Anne being the last representative of that ancient family. In 
the library the furniture dates back hundreds of years, and some fine 
specimens of oak carving belonging to the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries 
are to be found among the high-backed chairs. There is also a quaint 
old fifteenth-century table. The book-shelves contain a great number of 
old missals, breviaries, and books of piety, in whose fly-leaves may be read 
such names as Gage, Fitzherbert, Killingbeck, Clifford, Cholmeley, 
Needham, Vavasour, Brackenbury, Philip Hamerton (the father of the 
founder of the Pontefract mission), Father James Meynell, and many of 
the Annes. 

" In 1907, in taking some measurements in the attics, a small chamber 
was discovered to which there was no access except by crawling along a 
very narrow space under the roof for a distance of some twenty yards. 
This chamber measures seven or eight feet square, and was empty, but it 
was so constructed that any one in the room would think that the space 
was the well of the staircase adjoining. A builder who has seen it can 
give no explanation why it was made, as it is not in any way necessary to 
the construction of the building. 

" Burghwallis is the mother mission of the whole neighbourhood : in 
*Y 353 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

fact Burgh wallis has always been Catholic. The date of the present chapel, 
an unpretentious addition to the house in red brick, is uncertain, but its 
very unecclesiastical appearance outside, and its unobtrusive public 
entrance up a narrow flight of stone steps in the back yard point to 
its having been built in penal times, probably some time early in the 
eighteenth century. It is evident that Catholicism was flourishing in 
Burghwallis in 1732, for we find in the parish register jof that year, in Latin, 
an entry which, translated, reads: 'Dedicated to posterity, 1732. 
Dec. 23rd, Marm : Downes, S.T. B., Fellow of the College of St. John 
the Evangelist at Cambridge, most willingly resigned this rectory. May 
better treatment await my successors whilst they dwell in this parish, but 
I consider this rather to be hoped for than expected, papist fury not 
being yet extinguished, nor, as there is likelihood to judge, is it soon to 
be so.' " * 

* We give the original Latin : 
Poiteris Sacrum 1732. 

Dec. 23 ko . Hanc rectoriam lubentisiime resignavlt Mann. Downes, S.T.B. Socius Coll.iD. 
Johannis Evang. apud Cantab. : Successors meos meliora fata maneant, dum in hoc page Ho moram 
traxerint ; sed hoc sperandum fotius juam credendum censeo ; furore pap'utico nondum extincto 
nejue, uti prodive estju/iicare,jamjam cxstinguendo. 



354 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

FOR some years I have been trying to chronicle and describe, in 
as complete a manner as possible, the scattered relics of our 
glorious martyrs which have been preserved by the faithful, in 
remembrance of a period of persecution (1535-1681) almost 
unparalleled for length and ferocity. 

Though still incomplete, my collections have now swelled to a large 
folio MS. volume of nearly three hundred pages, and it may not be 
without interest to Catholics if I give some brief account of them here. 
The list would indeed have been far longer and more important were it 
not for the terrible ravages of the French Revolution. In this sad 
period the sacred relics which had often been snatched at the risk of life 
from the persecutors, or bought perhaps by pious Catholics from a venal 
hangman at the very foot of the gibbet, or distributed by the martyrs 
themselves on the eve of their agony, were torn from the religious houses 
and colleges on the Continent where they had long been preserved, and 
were scattered, lost, or destroyed. 

Thus, of the many holy relics preserved till then at the English 
College of Douay, the alma mater of the majority of our martyrs, nothing, 
or scarcely anything, remains to us. The body of the Venerable John 
Southworth, in its leaden coffin, still lies hidden, no doubt, somewhere 
in the grounds of the College, which is now transformed into barracks. 
It used to rest under the altar of St. Augustine of Canterbury in the 
College church, and was buried, for safety, at the outbreak of the 
Revolution. Strange that while the hidden plate was afterwards, at least 
in part, dug up and recovered, we find no more trace of the martyr's 
relics.* 

At the adjoining English Benedictine Monastery (now alas ! desecrated) 
were formerly venerated the quarters of Dom John Roberts, O.S.B., and 
of his companion in martyrdom, the Rev. Thomas Somers, which Dom 

* At Downside is a piece of tape in a paper bearing the following inscription : "The 
enclosed is part of some tape which I, Richard Southworth, found tied round the leaden 
coffin in which is enclosed the body of the Rev. John Southworth, who suffered death for 
his priestly character under Oliver Cromwell, June a8th, in the year of our Lord 1654. 
This I brought with me to England in the year 1786 when I first came over on the 
mission. I took it from the coffin above-mentioned, which at that time lay under St. 
Augustine's Altar at Doway College, but was afterwards, during the trouble in France, 
removed and buried deep in a private place within the precincts or premises of the said 
College. It still remains there. 

" Brockhampton, June 22nd, 1816. 

" RICHD. SOUTHWORTH." 
Endorsed outside 

"Taken from under St. Augustine's Altar at Doway College in 1786." 

355 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Augustine Bradshaw tried to get leave to place upon the altar on high 
feast days. For many years these sacred treasures were lost sight of, and 
were supposed to have perished at the Revolution. Shortly, however, 
before the expulsion of the monks from Douay (to be precise, in May 
1902), Abbot Gasquet was led to examine a chest of unknown relics which 
for many years had lain beneath the high altar of the monastic church. 
Together with the relics of a St. Fabian, a martyr from the Roman 
Catacombs, he found several large bones "all comparatively recent, 
heavy, and well preserved." They consist of a leg quarter (right) with 
a part of the foot, a right and left humerus, and two small ribs four 
large bones and six small. They all, apparently, belong to the same 
body. On the tibia a paper label was fixed. It was torn, and only the 
following words were legible : 

... 1 ho ... 

Vide Arnoldum Raiisium In C. . . 
Martyriu . . . Anglo Duacensiu . . . 

Pag 73 
(The paper is torn at the dots, but is quite easy to read.) 

Reference to Arnold Raisse's little Catalogue Christi Sacerdotum, qui 
e nobili Anglicano Duacen* civitatis Collegia Proseminati prceclarum fidei 
testimonium in Britannia prabuerunt (Duaci, 1630) shows that these are 
the relics of the Venerable Thomas Wilson (alias Somers), though Abbot 
Gasquet at first supposed that they belonged to his more famous com- 
panion. These relics were translated to Downside on Tuesday, 
August 18, 1903. It is a very great disappointment that the relics of 
the Venerable John Roberts, founder of the Community now at Down- 
side, are apparently lost without hope of recovery. Gone, too, is the 
head of that glorious martyr, Dom Mark Barkworth, which Arnold 
Raisse beheld and venerated there, wrapped in silk and gold. 

Though the Jesuits have still preserved portions of their treasures, 
they are as nothing compared with those which were once preserved at 
their Colleges of St. Omer, Liege, Watten, Valladolid and Rome. There 
may yet, indeed, be bodies or relics of the English martyrs hidden away 
in Spain, but, even there, many have been lost owing to the Revolution 
and the suppression of the religious houses. Thus, for instance, the arm of 
the Venerable John Roberts, O.S.B., once preserved at his own monastery 
of Saint Martin, Compostella, was a relic which the late lamented 
prelate, Don Rudesindo Salvado, Abbot nullius of New Nursia, himself the 
last survivor of that ancient house, told me that he distinctly remembered. 

We must, however, be thankful for what still remains to us ; and the 
fewer are the treasures, the more precious have they become. Arnold 
356 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

Raisse, in his Hierogazophylacium Belgicum, has left us a catalogue of the 
principal relics preserved before the Revolution in Belgium, which 
makes us conscious of many of our losses. But there were very many 
which he does not mention, some of which are still happily preserved. 

The Acts of the Martyrs constantly speak of the efforts made by the 
faithful to obtain their relics. Here, as in many another trait, these acts 
seem to take us back to the times of the primitive Church. Again we 
see a Lucina or a Praxedes gathering up the torn members of the martyrs 
of Christ, and preserving them for the veneration of the faithful. The 
touching story of the rescue of the bodies of Dom Maurus Scott, O.S.B., 
and his companion, made from under a heap of festering corpses, by a 
band of devoted Spanish Catholics, is well known; and the filial devotion 
of Margaret Roper, who rescued the head of Blessed Thomas More 
from its spike on London Bridge, was rivalled by the piety of Donna 
Luisa da Carvajal, that noble Spanish lady who devoted her life to 
ministering to the martyrs of Christ. We read how she had their sacred 
relics rescued at dead of night, and how she went with her companions in 
devout procession to receive them when they were brought to her house. 
Twelve of them, wearing white veils and carrying lighted tapers in their 
hands, would stand at the entrance of the house, and after venerating 
the holy treasure, would conduct the brave bearers through the passages, 
strewn with sweet-smelling flowers and decked with green branches, to 
the door of the oratory. Tenderly, and with mingled feelings of joy 
and sorrow, would they lay them there, while all night long prayerful 
vigil was kept around those glorious trophies. Luisa herself next day 
would wrap them in winding-sheets and embalm them in spices, and 
there they would remain in safety until it was possible to send them 
over to the Continent. 

The Spanish Ambassadors themselves frequently showed the greatest 
zeal in collecting these sacred treasures. There are still venerated at 
Gondomar the relics of Venerable Thomas Maxtield (Tyburn, July i, 
1616), and Venerable John Almond (Tyburn, December 5, 1612), 
priests, which were obtained for the Duke of that name, then Ambassador 
in England, by his son, Don Antonio Surmiento, who was himself 
present at the martyrdoms. A still more ardent client of the martyrs 
was another Ambassador, the Count Egmont (afterwards Duke of 
Gueldres), whose long list of relics obtained during his sojourn in 
England (1640-1645) still exists in the Archives at Lille, and was 
published by the late Mr. Richard Simpson in the Tumbler* It is so 
little known, and it throws so vivid and so terrible a light on the details 
of the persecution that it may not be amiss to reprint it here in full : 
* New Series, vol. viii. (1857), p. 114. 

357 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

" Louis, by the grace of God, Duke of Gueldres, Julliac, and Cleves, 
Count of Ormund, and Zutphen, Prince of Ghent, Count of Bures, 
Liege, &c., Lord of the cities and territories of either Mechlin, &c. &c. 

"Whereas the English Catholics, who had been allowed some little 
repose for a few years, were, after the opening of the parliament in 
1640, oppressed with a new and most bitter persecution; and whereas 
the utmost care and diligence were employed against priests, that when 
they were driven off, the flock, deprived of its pastors, might be more 
easily devoured, therefore, besides the resumption of the laws made by 
Queen Elizabeth against priests and Catholics (which had been a short 
time dormant), new and most savage acts were passed against the 
servants of God, forbidding a priest to minister to Catholics in England 
under pain of death. But as when the ancient faith and religion were first 
expelled from England, no fear of a cruel death, nor threats of 
agonising tortures, could remove the faithful and watchful pastors from 
the flock committed to them, but rather gave many inhabitants to 
heaven, many martyrs to the Church, many patron saints to the Christian 
world ; so also, during this persecution, England has beheld her most 
constant champions, her bravest heroes, enduring the most cruel 
torments for Christ and the Catholic faith. And as at that time our 
own business detained us in England, we were, by a sovereign grace of 
Almighty God, an eye-witness of the incredible constancy of divers 
martyrs ; and out of the fifteen who, from the year 1640 to the end of 
the year 1645, gained the palm of martyrdom in different places, we saw 
eleven suffer in London, of whom were four secular priests, William 
Ward, Arnold Green,* John Morgan, John Duckett ; three of the 
Society of Jesus, Thomas Holland, Ralph Corby, Henry Morse; one 
Benedictine, Bartholomew Rho [Roe] ; and three Franciscan Minorites, 
Bolliquer [Thomas Bullaker], Francis Bell, and Paul of St. Magdalen 
[Henry Heath]. When these men, for God's cause and the Church's, 
were led like sheep to the slaughter, were hanged, were cruelly bowelled 
before they were half dead, were burnt, and were cut into quarters, we, 
in order that the memory of such noble persons might be for ever 
preserved among the faithful, and desirous of having, so far as it lay in 
our power, some relics of their bodies, by the aid, the devotion, and the 
diligence of our servants, did" procure certain relics, which, on our 
departure out of England into France at the end of the year 1645, we 
carried with us, and have preserved to this day in our treasury ; wherein 
as we intend to shut them all up, we have judged it necessary to publish 
abroad this testimony, lest devouring oblivion should ever erase the name 
of these venerable men, and the glory of these most renowned martyrs. 

* Called by Challoner, Thomas Reynolds. 
358 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

We, therefore, desiring more and more to promote the worship of God 
and the honour of the saints, and since we have no dearer wish than the 
aforesaid venerable martyrs should be worshipped, venerated, and 
honoured as they should be, have made known to all to whom this 
present testimonal shall come, that the said venerable martyrs did, at 
London, in England, contend with the greatest constancy for the ancient 
faith, and, so to say, for their altars ; did overcome, and did obtain the 
crown of martyrdom ; and that we, by means of the aid of our servants 
and their devotion to the martyred saints, did recover the relics of the 
said martyrs here underwritten, namely : Of the venerable martyr 
William Ward, secular priest, who suffered at London, July 26, in the 
year 1641 : his heart, drawn out from the fire wherein it had lain about 
five hours ; the handkerchief he had in his hand when he died ; his ring, 
and his diurnal. Of the venerable martyrs, Arnold Green, secular 
priest, and Bartholomew Roe, of the order of St. Benedict, who 
suffered at London, January 31, in the year 1642 : of Father 
Bartholomew Roe, his Breviary, a thumb, a piece of burnt lung, a 
piece of kidney burned to a cinder, the interula with which he was 
martyred, and a towel dipped in his blood ; of Mr. Arnold Green, a 
thumb, a piece of burnt liver, a towel dipped in his blood, and a night- 
cap which was drawn over his eyes when he was hanged, a sponge, a 
piece of linen, and a towel dipped in their blood, and the apron and 
sleeves of the torturer. Of the venerable martyr, John Morgan, secular 
priest, who suffered at London, April 26, 1642, certain papers containing 
pieces of altered and burnt flesh, three pieces of his prsecordia, some of 
his hair, four towels dipped in his blood, the straw on which he was laid 
to be embowelled, some papers greased with his fat, the rope wherewith 
he was hanged. Of the venerable martyr (Thomas) Bolliquer, of the 
Order of the Friars Minor of St. Francis, who suffered at London 
(October 12, 1642), a little piece of his heart, some pieces of his bones 
and flesh, his liver, his diaphragm, some of his prascordia, two fingers, 
some hair, four towels dipped in his blood, the straw on which he was 
laid to be embowelled, some papers greased with his fat, the rope where- 
with he was hanged. Of the venerable martyr, Paul of St. Magdalen, 
guardian of the Convent of English Minors at Douai, who suffered 
(April 17, 1643), a toe > three small bones, a piece of the windpipe, some 
of his burnt flesh, the straw on which he was laid to be embowelled, four 
napkins dipped in his blood, the rope wherewith he was hanged. Of the 
venerable martyr, Francis Bell, guardian of the English Friars Minor at 
Douai, who suffered December i, 1643, a right-hand quarter of his body, 
six pieces of his flesh and fat, three napkins dipped in his blood and 
melted fat, with the remains of flesh, two fingers, and other small bones, 

359 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

his thyrotheca. Of the venerable martyr, Thomas Holland, priest of the 
Society of Jesus, who suffered at London, December 22, 1642, one 
bone, some pieces of skin, a nail, some hair, two napkins stained with 
blood, a little box of fat, some papers greased with his fat, the shirt in 
which he suffered. Of the venerable martyrs, Ralph Corby, of the 
Society of Jesus, and John Duckett, secular priest, who suffered at 
London, September 17, 1644 : of Mr. Duckett, the right hand, a piece 
of his neck, one vertebra and a half, with three other small pieces ; of 
Father Corby, some vertebras, with a piece of flesh, a tooth, a few napkins 
stained with blood, two handkerchiefs that he used at his martyrdom, the 
girdle wherewith he was then girdled, and his hat, some remains of burnt 
viscera, some hair and skin of both. Of the venerable martyr, Henry 
Morse, of the Society of Jesus, who suffered on February i, 1645, a 
right side quarter, the right hand separated from the same, his liver 
pulled out of the fire, a handkerchief stained with his blood, ashes of his 
burnt intestines, the rope wherewith he was hanged, his hat, shirt, collar, 
breeches, stockings, the apron and sleeves of the torturer. Some part of 
the skin, with hair upon it, of a certain Benedictine Father, who, with, 
his companion, suffered at York when Charles, king of England, was 
there.* Which relics we testify that we did recover by the assistance of 
our said domestics, who, with our knowledge and command, and in our 
sight, and under the very eyes of the heretics, with no small risk of their 
lives, did snatch part of them out of the midst of the flames, and the 
other part did purchase of the executioner at the very time of the 
execution ; of which thing, as of all the premises, were witnesses ; 
Peregrine Abbot of Carlen, Abbot of St. Mary's, our chief councillor ; 
Mr. Charles Cheney, missionary from the Holy See to propagate the 
faith among the English, our domestic prelate and almoner; Mr. Robert 
de Mortimer, also a missionary priest ; Mr. Aymond de la Tour, 
captain of a troop of an hundred cavalry under the most Christian king, 
and our councillor ; M. Daniel de Bertair, our chief steward and a 
councillor ; M. Philip de Circouve, the first gentleman of our chamber ; 
M. Ame de la Riviere, our shieldbearer ; M. Peter de Belluart ; 
Mr. John Morgan ; Anthony du Bois, of our bedchamber, and our 
secretary ; Peter Garret and Louis Noel, also of our bedchamber ; 
Edward Locke, surgeon of our chamber ; Peter of Lyons, who after- 
wards suffered martyrdom for the faith in Ireland ; Simon du Bois ; 

Gabriel Tirion ; James Beaucourt ; Quentin ; Alexander 

Hocart ; Francis Daniel ; and others our servants, official and other. 
In witness of all which, we have signed with our own hand, and sealed 

" Venerable John Lockwood, York, April 1 3, 1642. He was a confrater or oblate 
of the Order of St. Benedict. 
360 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

with our own seal, this present testimonial, valid for future as well as 
present times; and have ordered our said almoner, in his official capacity, 
to sign it in the name of all our domestics. Given at Paris, in our 
house at St. Victor, July 26, A.D. 1650." * 

A truly ghastly list ! but one which tells us more significantly than 
pages of description, the kind of fate which our martyrs looked forward 
to with so much joy. I do not know if these relics collected by the 
Duke still exist, but it is greatly to be hoped that they may yet be found. 
Challoner (quoting De Marsys) gives a long and most interesting 
account of the manner in which the heart of the Venerable William 
Ward was saved. 

"... A person of great quality, Count Egmond by name, hearing 
by a servant of his who was present at the action, that an holy priest had 
suffered martyrdom that morning, asked his servant if he had brought 
any relic of the martyr away with him, who told him Yes, and gave him 
(as he said) the very handkerchief which the saint had cast out of his 
pocket. The Count, taking it with reverence, kissed it ; but finding no 
blood upon the same, gave the servant his own handkerchief, command- 
ing him to run back instantly to the place of execution, and to dip that 
in some of the martyr's blood, if he could find any. The servant 
posting away came back to the gallows, made diligent search for some of 
the blood, but finding it was all scraped up by the zeal of other pious 
Catholics who had been before him, takes his stick, and rubbing up the 
ashes where the bowels of the martyr had been burnt, finds a lump of flesh 
all parched and singed by the fiery embers wherein it lay covered, and 
hastily wrapped up what he had found in the handkerchief which his 
lord had given him, not having time to shake off the fiery coals or hot 
ashes by reason that some malicious persons that stood by, and saw this 
fellow stooping and taking somewhat out of the fire, demanded of him 
what he took thence. . . ." 

The account then goes on to describe how the man " nimbly slipped 
over a park pale " and ran for his life, hotly pursued by the enemy, both 
on horse and foot. Resolved not to lose the relic, he hastily dropped it, 
as he ran, into a bush, taking care to mark its position so that he might 
return to find it when the hue and cry was over. " And this he did 
with such dexterity, making no stop at all, but feigning a small trip or 
stumble, and yet seeming suddenly to recover himself, ran on, drawing 

* Endorsed in French : " Act of his Highness touching the relics of England." Simpson 
truly remarks : " These relics were not the less venerable on account of the disgusting pro- 
cesses they had gone through ; the horror does not attach to them, but to the brutes who 
presided over the butchery." 

2Z 36l 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

his pursuers after him, to delude them, and thereby to save the relic. In 
brief, this poor man recovered the outskirts of the town ere he was over- 
taken." He was of course apprehended, but the ambassador's influence 
was sufficient to get him speedily released, and early next morning he 
found the relic where he had left it in the park. It turned out to be 
the martyr's heart, and it was considered miraculous that the handkerchief 
which enfolded it had not been burned nor singed by the hot embers which 
clung to it, while the heart itself remained untainted and incorrupt for 
fifteen days, when the Count had it embalmed, " not to preserve it from 
corruption, which it seemed no way to incline to, but for reverence and 
religion to so rich a relic." " Quia pretiosa in conspectu Domini mors sanc- 
torum ejus." 

There is at Downside a large piece of coarse sacking thickly clotted 
with blood, which is stated to have been dipped in the blood of the 
Venerable Alban Roe, O.S.B. It has been suggested that it may possibly 
form part of the " apron of the torturer," which was among the relics of 
this martyr secured by the Duke, as it is of precisely the material which 
one would expect such a garment to be made of. 

The Duke's catalogue is, however, a very fair specimen of the kind 
of relics which are still preserved. They mostly consist of pieces of 
flesh or bone, linen dipped in blood (the most common of all), and pieces 
of straw also stained with blood. In the case of these martyrs we con- 
stantly find the Catholics dipping their handkerchiefs in the blood of the 
sufferers. Thus a contemporary ballad, describing the martyrdom of the 
Venerable John Thulis : 

" A hundred handkerchiefs 

With his sweet blood was dight, 
As relics for to wear 

For this said blessed wight." 

Again, in the Acts of the martyrs already referred to, V. Thomas 
Reynolds and V. Alban Roe, O.S.B. , we read : " The Catholics piously 
vied with each other in taking away relics of the martyrs. Many dipped 
handkerchiefs in the dismembered bodies ; others carefully collected the 
blood-stained straw from off the ground ; while some snatched from the 
flames the intestines, which, as usual, had been thrown into the cauldron, 
and carried them home."* If is interesting to note in connection with 
this passage that the relics of these martyrs preserved to this day at 
Lanherne, Colwich, and Erdington, consist precisely of pieces of linen 
soaked in blood, and little bits of straw. 

At the martyrdom of the Venerable Edward Morgan, a more singular 
phenomenon was witnessed : 

* Pollen, Acts of English Martyrs, p. 343. 
362 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

" The officers calling for the people's handkerchiefs and gloves to 
wet in the blood, which they did, and delivered them again to their 
owners, and one got almost his whole heart out of the fire." * 

This was~very different from the scenes at earlier martyrdoms, where 
every effort was made to prevent the people getting hold of any relic, 
and where those who were detected trying to do so were frequently sent 
to prison. Here, again, we are reminded of the martyrs of the primitive 
Church, and the penal days in England recall the highest memories of 
those days of early fervour. Thus, at the martyrdom of Blessed 
Edmund Campion and his companions, a youth secured the martyr's 
thumb, which was handed over to the Society, and is probably the relic 
now treasured at the Gesu in Rome. It has of late years been divided, 
and half is in the hands of the Fathers of the English Province. But, 
as a rule, the precautions taken by the authorities to prevent these pious 
thefts were only too successful. It will be remembered how everything 
stained with the blood of Mary Queen of Scots was burned in the Great 
Hall of Fotheringay Castle, immediately after the execution. In the 
same way the relics of many of our martyrs were destroyed. Their 
heads were usually put up on spikes on London Bridge, or on the gate- 
ways of the towns where they had been martyred ; and when room was 
wanted for more, they were thrown into the river or other inaccessible 
places. Thus were treated the heads of the Carthusian Priors, to make 
way for those of Blessed More and Fisher. The head of Father John 
Cornelius, S.J., was used as a football by the bigoted mob at Dorchester, 
before it was placed over the town gate. That of Venerable James Bird, 
a lad of eighteen, was placed over a gateway of the City of Winchester, 
where his aged father, passing beneath one day, fancied he saw it bow 
reverently to him. 

One of the most precious relics that still remains to us is the head of 
Blessed Cuthbert Mayne, the protomartyr of the Seminary Priests, now 
preserved at Lanherne. The square hole made by the spike on which it 
was exposed on Launceston Castle can still be seen in the skull. A 
pathetic story in the York records tells how a female prisoner, Mrs. 
Hutton, and her children, got into trouble for rescuing the heads of two 

* I believe this heart is still preserved at St. Scholastica's Abbey, Teignmouth. It is 
2^ in. in length, nearly 2 in. in breadth at the widest, and l in. thick. It is preserved 
in a curious cardboard box in the shape of a heart, just large enough to hold it. The box 
has intricate patterns on it made in very fine straw. The tradition handed dawn in the 
convent is that it is " the heart of one of the martyred missionary priests, which jumped 
out of the fire into which it had been thrown." In 1751 a lay-sister named Sister Agnes 
Morgan was professed in the English Benedictine Convent at Pontoise, and at the dissolution 
of that monastery joined the Teignmouth Community, then at Dunkirk. The relic is 
known to have come from Pontoise, and it is very likely that it belonged to Sister Morgan. 

363 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

martyrs which were exposed on the leads over the prison in which they 
were confined. The children were interrogated in vain, and stood their 
whippings with a fortitude above their years ; while the heroic mother 
was thrust down into the frightful underground dungeons of the Lower 
Kidcote on Ouse-bridge, where in a few days she died. These heads 
may possibly be the same as those that were discovered in recent years 
walled up in the old church of the Vavasours at Hazlewood, though it is 
more probable that these are the heads of the aged martyr, Venerable John 
Lockwood, and his younger companion, Venerable Edmund Catherick, 
who suffered at York, April 13, 1642. Others, martyrs in the same 
cause, were Thomas Monday and Thurstan Hickman, who, as Wriothes- 
ley's Chronicle * informs us, were arrested, tried at the Guildhall, and 
condemned to death for endeavouring to carryover to France the arm of 
the Blessed John Houghton, Prior of the London Charterhouse, and 
other relics. This arm, as will be remembered, had been fixed up over 
the very gate of the Charterhouse a hideous piece of barbarity intended 
to strike terror into the hearts of the heroic monks. One day it fell 
down at the feet of two of them, who hastily concealed it. Unhappily, 
they were unsuccessful in their attempt to send it oversea. Those 
entrusted with this precious relic suffered the death of traitors, and 
doubtless were welcomed to Heaven by the martyrs they had sought to 
honour on earth.f 

The main sources of the sacred treasures still preserved are, of course, 
the old religious communities which were founded on the Continent 
during the times of persecution, and settled in England at the French 
Revolution. Many of these communities succeeded in bringing over 
at least a portion of their treasures. Thus at Taunton, Lanherne, 
Darlington, Chichester, and Colwich are still preserved the relics once 
venerated at Nieuport, Antwerp, Gravelines, Hoogstraet, and Paris. At 
Downside are collected the treasures of Lambspring, while at Newton 
Abbot the Canonesses of St. Augustine still venerate the hair-shirt of 
Blessed Thomas More, which formed their chief treasure at Louvain. 
The English Canonesses who still inhabit their old convent at Bruges 

* Wriothesley (Camden Soc.), 1875, i. 184-85 (July I, 1547). Monday was parson of 
St. Leonard's, Foster Lane, and Hickman, a monk of the London Charterhouse. John 
Foxe, parson of St. Mary Magdalene, in the ward of Queenhithe, and one of the expelled 
Carthusians, had managed to escape overseas to the Louvain Charterhouse. Monday and 
Hickman had promised to follow him and bring him " the left arm " of B. John Houghton, 
" with other baggage that they called reliques," but they were apprehended, tried at the 
Guildhall, and condemned to death as traitors. The fate of this relic, which has been 
much discussed, is thus made clear ; and it would seem that yet another martyr should be 
added to the ranks of the London Carthusians. See Stowe, Annales, London, 1631, p. 594. 

t Unhappily, not a single relic of the eighteen Carthusians has been preserved. 
364 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

have some notable relics, while many other communities which succeeded 
in reaching England in safety, unhappily lost their treasures. A story 
told in the annals of St. Benedict's Priory, Colwich (then at Paris), shows 
how difficult it was to preserve them : 

" The man employed by the administrators to make the search said 
he knew how nuns did hide things, but he knew how to find them, for 
his wife had taught him. He therefore spent a long time in picking 
open pin-cushions, and at length found concealed in a very large one a 
great quantity of relics. He then seemed much diverted, and carefully 
took them out by parcells, and put them on the window-seat behind him, 
where a nun had placed herself, who kept her eye on what he did, and 
the other nuns were emptying down before him the contents of their 
drawers, work-bags, and other things, so that he was greatly bewildered 
with such variety, and as he was seated on the ground, he was almost, or 
half of him, covered with things. Thus they amused him until he forgot 
the treasures he had put in security, as he thought, and being carried 
away by another guard, he never more thought to look for what he had 
laid in the window ; and the relics were saved by this means." 

However, on the journey from the Convent to the Castle of Vin- 
cennes, they were very nearly lost again, as the bag containing them was 
let fall by a frightened nun under the wheels of the coach ; but again 
they were providentially recovered.* 

The Poor Clares of Ayre possessed the head of Venerable John 
Wall, O.S.F. (Father Joachim of S. Anne, Worcester, August 22, 1679.) 
They joined their sisters at Gravelines in 1834, but left two years later 
to join the Rouen Poor Clares at Scorton, near Darlington. Afraid, 
however, to encounter the English Custom House officers with the head 

* They were, however, strangely enough, lost again in the convent itself, or, rather, 
lost to sight and memory. When the late Father Morris made his list of English Martyr 
relics he asked if the nuns of Colwich had any, and they replied they had not. However, 
later on it struck them to examine the contents of a bag, or rather cushion, of relics, 
which was in possession of the infirmarian, and used to be laid on the bed of a sick nun. 
In this they found sewn up, to their great joy, relicsof no fewer than twenty-nine different 
martyrs, including one of Venerable Margaret Ward, which is supposed to be unique, and 
others almost equally scarce. These relics are all very small ; they have been neatly 
mounted in test-tubes, and sealed by the Bishop of Birmingham. The nuns have generously 
given a portion of their treasures to Downside and Erdington Abbeys. They have, un- 
happily, lost the arm of Venerable Oliver Plunket, which they once possessed. They have, 
however, a large circular pewter dish which belonged to Blessed Richard Whiting, Abbot 
of Glastonbury, which bears in the centre his rebus a whiting. This was given to them 
after their return to England by Lady Arundel of Wardour. The most remarkable of their 
English Martyr relics, besides that of Mrs. Ward, are those of Blessed Richard Thirkeld, 
Venerable William Harrington, Venerable Thomas Pickering, O.S.B., Venerable Richard 
Langhorne (which are all extremely rare), and some of Venerable Philip Powel, O.S.B., 
inscribed : " Rd. fa Philife ye m: his Reliques and cloth viett with his blood and tears." 

365 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

in their possession, they buried it before leaving Gravelines in the cloister 
garden, near the kitchen, enclosed in a wooden box. Repeated searches 
have been made for the head by the Ursuline nuns, who now possess the 
old Convent of the English Poor Clares at Gravelines, but hitherto 
without success. 

Besides the relics preserved in religious communities, others have been 
handed down in old Catholic families from time immemorial. Some 
time ago the writer was brought a little collection of relics which had 
been treasured for centuries in an old Catholic family in Warwickshire. 
Very pathetic were these memorials of the penal days. They mostly 
consisted of little slips of linen deeply stained with blood, enclosed in 
papers which bore, in quaint seventeenth-century handwriting, such 
inscriptions as " bishup plunkit's blood," " Mr. Johnson his blood." 
Besides the relics of our martyrs, were others of those not usually 
reckoned among them : for instance, Lord Derwentwater ; and, most 
interesting of all, several of King James II. 

But it is time to describe the principal treasures which are still 
preserved amongst us ; and we naturally begin with reliquice insignes. 
Of whole bodies there are very few, if indeed the mutilated quarters can 
be given that name. The most famous are those of Archbishop Plunket, 
at Downside Abbey, and of Philip Howard, Earl of Arundel, in the 
Fitzalan Chapel at Arundel. Archbishop Plunket's relics were taken by 
his friend and fellow prisoner, Abbot Maurus Corker, to his abbey at 
Lambspring in 1685, and were translated to Downside in 1883. The 
head of the venerable martyr is at the Siena Convent, Drogheda ; one of 
the arms at the Franciscan Convent, Taunton ; while the other, as we 
said, is lost. There are said to be some large bones of the martyr at 
Rome, but I have not been able to discover where they are kept. One 
large relic was left at Lambspring, and several smaller relics detached in 
1883. I have before me a list of the bones now at Downside, made by 
a medical man at the time of the translation ; it includes most of the 
skeleton, with the exceptions already mentioned. The body of V. Philip 
Howard is entire, save for a bone which was taken out by the late Canon 
Tierney, and given to the mother of the present Duke, who enshrined it 
in a gold reliquary. Each of the bones is separated and wrapped in silk. 

There are bodies of other martyrs in Protestant hands, notably that 
of B. Margaret Pole, Countess of Salisbury, in the Chapel of St. Peter 
ad Vincula in the Tower (a thigh-bone of hers was shown as a curiosity to 
the King of Siam !) ; that of V. John Kemble, which lies in Welsh Newton 
churchyard, and of V. Charles Baker, S.J., just outside the west door 
of the old Priory Church at Usk ; while those of others are known to 
rest in various churches or churchyards, but the exact spot has been un- 
366 



L , 




THE RELICS AT SUTTON PARK, GUILDFORD 

Photo by the author 



To face f age 366 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

happily lost sight of. Thus the bodies of B. John Fisher and B. Thomas 
More may possibly yet be found under the belfry in St. Peter's ad 
Vincula, unless the tradition of their having been moved to Chelsea be 
correct. (If so, they are hopelessly lost, for the tomb in Chelsea Church 
is said to be empty.) B. Thomas Percy lies somewhere on the site 
of the demolished Church of St. Crux, at York ; V. Thomas Thwing 
in St. Mary's Church, Castlegate, York ; and several other York martyrs 
in various churches and cemeteries of the city ;* while Venerable John 
Wall was buried in St. Oswald's churchyard at Worcester. But it is 
very unlikely that their sacred relics will ever be recovered. More happy 
are V. Thomas Maxfield and V. John Almond, who, as we said, rest at 
Gondomar in Spain, though considerable portions of their relics have 
been translated to Downside. 

Next in importance come the heads of the martyrs. There are many 
of these preserved. That of B. Thomas More is, I believe, still safe in 
its niche in the Roper vault in St. Dunstan's, Canterbury. 1 have a 
drawing of it which appeared in the Gentleman's ("Magazine in 1837. The 
vault was accidentally broke open in I 835, and the head was found enclosed 
in a leaden box, somewhat in the shape of a beehive, open in the front, 
with an iron grating in front of it. Margaret Roper, whose filial 
devotion preserved this precious treasure, was, strangely enough, not 
buried in this vault, but at Chelsea ; so that Tennyson's beautiful lines 
in his Dream of Fair Women are not justified by facts. I believe that 
since the restoration of the church access to the vault, has been rendered 
impracticable, the organ having been placed over it, and the vault itself 
filled up with earth. 

Among the heads of martyrs in Catholic hands, besides the skull of 
B. Cuthbert Mayne at Lanherne,f there are those of V.Christopher Wharton 
{York, March 28, 1600) at Downside, V. Oliver Plunket at Drogheda, 
and V. William Andleby at Bruges. That of Archbishop Plunket is 
noteworthy in that it sometimes emits a supernatural perfume which 

* E.g., V. William Spencer and V. Robert Hardesty in Holy Trinity Church, Mickle- 
gate Street, or else in that of St. Martin close by. V. Thomas Watkinson in the churchyard 
of St. John's Church. 

t It is the upper part of the skull. A large piece of the lower part (that under the 
right ear) is at Sutton Place, near Guildford, in possession of the Salvin family. It was 
found in this beautiful old mansion of the Westons, together with a large portion of the 
clavicle of St. William of York, a rib of V. Robert Sutton (Stafford, July 27, 1587), and 
a vertebra of one of the Fathers Garnet. I give an illustration of these relics together with 
the old tabernacle (said to be of Marian date), in which they were preserved ; a chalice 
of the penal times; and a Pre-Reformation sacring-bell. All these treasures now belong to 
the Church of St. Edward, Sutton Place, and the relics have been recently enshrined in 
modern reliquaries by the Rector, the Rev. Dr. Hinsley, to whose kindness the writer owes 
the gift of certain portions of each relic. 

367 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

lasts for some minutes after the shrine is opened, and has been observed 
by many persons of the highest credit. The flesh and skin are still upon 
the face, the skin being of a dark brown colour. Part of the left cheek 
and a little of the upper lip are burnt quite black, no doubt from the 
, fire into which it was thrown at the martyrdom. There is a little hair 
on the back of the head, and there is the mark of a deep cut across the 
top, as if an attempt had been made to split the skull. The coffin-plate 
of the martyr is also preserved in the convent. 

The skull of Father Andleby came to the English Convent at Bruges 
in a curious manner. We give a copy of the paper preserved with it, as 
a good illustration of the vicissitudes which many of the relics experienced : 

"Ad majorem Dei gloriam. I well remember that when Madame 
Vandenbrouek presented me the skull of the Rev. Wm. Andleby, it was 
without the under jaw. She had taken from it a tooth, which she kept 
as a relic for herself and family. She brought the whole from St. Omer's 
at a time when the French Revolution was in the hight [sic] of its fury 
against the God of their fathers, religion, and everything that related to 
religious worship. It came to her by a young man who came to her 
house and had an eye on her daughter. He had been at the sacking of 
the English College at St. Omer, and brought away the venerable head, 
which he treated with the utmost scorn and indignity, placing it with 
dirty pigs' feet, guts of dead animals, and all kinds of filth, to prove by 
fact that all prejudices were done away, and that the new way of thinking 
cut off at once all restraint on the score of religion. Miss Vandenbrouek 
received the present, but took care to have no more to say to the 
gentleman. Mrs. Vandenbrouek brought the head to Bruges, and 
presented it to Rev. Mother Anne Moore, rightly judging that the 
Community would be glad to receive the venerable head of an English 
martyr," &c. 

"ANNE MOORE, alias Sister MARY CLARE, 

"AugUSt 21, 1834." 

The name of the martyr has been written in ink, in a seventeenth- 
century hand, on the skull. Unhappily, this precaution has not been 
taken in other cases : there are, for instance, two martyrs' skulls preserved 
at St. Beuno's which cannot now be identified. One of them has a hole 
in the cranium made by the pike on which it was exposed ; with them 
are the bones of a leg which were found wrapped up in a child's jacket, 
in which they were evidently hidden when rescued by some pious and 
daring Catholic from the gate or public place where they had been 
exposed. Father Morris found the skeleton of a mouse inside one of the 
skulls ! It had apparently made a nest there, and when the skull was 
368 




Ihe Hand of To' 

at HcrefjfJ 



To face page 368 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

placed in a box, the mouse could not escape. These relics come from 
Holywell, and it is probable that they are those of V. Philip Evans, S.J. 
(Cardiff, July 22, 1679), and V - Charles Baker, S.J. (Usk, August 27, 
1679.) 

The hands of our martyrs still preserved are more numerous than the 
heads, and are most interesting relics. One of the most famous is that of 
V. Margaret Clitherowe, venerated at the Old Bar Convent at York a 
most pathetic memorial of that valiant woman, so justly known as the 
Pearl of York. It is in a beautiful state of preservation, though its vigilant 
guardians lament that since a joint of one finger was severed in order to 
give it to the late Mr. Charles Weld, the donor of the precious reliquary 
that now enshrines the hand, it has begun to show signs of decay. The 
contracted fingers speak most eloquently of the agony of the terrible peine 
forte et dure which Margaret underwent so bravely that Good Friday of 
1586. Then there is the left hand of V. Ambrose Barlow, O.S.B., at 
Stanbrook ; the right hand of V. Francis Ingleby (York, June 3, 1586) 
at Taunton ; the right hand of V. Nicholas Postgate (York, August 7, 
1679) at St. Cuthbert's, Durham; and the left hand of the same martyr 
at Ampleforth. At Hereford is the left hand of V. John Kemble 
(Hereford, August 22, 1679), which was gorgeously enshrined at the 
expense of the late Mr. Monteith of Carstairs, on his recovery from a very 
serious illness, when the hand was applied to his lips by Bishop Hedley. 
Still more famous is the " Holy Hand " of V. Edmund Arrowsmith, S.J. 

I will now endeavour briefly to enumerate the principal places where 
English martyr relics are preserved. The Archbishop of Westminster 
has in his keeping relics of various martyrs, the most important of 
which is a bone, about six inches in length (the left clavicle), "taken 
out of ye neck of Mr. Southworth, who suffered under Oliver Crom- 
well ... by Mr. James Clark, chirugeon, who embalmed the body." 
There are some other very interesting relics in this collection which 
have been recently discovered and set in order by Father J. H. 
Pollen, S.J. Some, mainly of the Gates Plot martyrs, were in a 
box with the inscription "To Lady Belling." This lady was the 
wife of Sir William Belling, Chamberlain to Catharine of Braganza. 
Among these is one labelled, " This is all the King's Blood," the King 
being James II. There is also a beautiful piece of cloth of gold which 
the South Kensington authorities have identified as being a piece of tenth- 
century work from Constantinople. A pattern of eagles, &c., is woven 
into the costly fabric. Though still brilliant, it has marks on it which 
show it to have been buried. It bears the inscription, " This came out of 
St. Edward's shrine a great relic." It is evidently part of the saintly 
Confessor's royal robe, taken from his tomb at the last opening in 
3 A 369 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

James II. 's reign. There are two large "pieces of Bishop plunkets 
handkerchief," and half a corporal soaked with the blood of Father Paul 
Heath, O.S.F. 

A curious relic is a ringer of a very hard leather glove, inscribed as 
follows : 

" This is forefinger of the left handed Gloufe of Mr. Francis Ingelby, 
Martir martired at Yorke." 

Another curious relic is a patch of skin, with no name, but the 
inscription, "For Crany to wear at the breast." It seems to be the skin 
of a leg, and has a hole in it, as if for a ribbon to wear round the neck. 
Let us hope that " Granny " found comfort, if not healing, from wearing 
it. This was among Lady Belling's treasures. 

There are large pieces of linen soaked in Father Morgan's blood, three 
pieces of the heart of Venerable John Lockwood (one has a clot of blood 
now turned to dust in it), part of the upper jaw of Father Maxfield, a 
bone (the end of a toe) of Venerable Edmund Catherick, and some of his 
hair, &c. Some are enclosed in a silk heart, like an Agnus Dei case, with 
"English Martyrs" embroidered on one side, and I.H.S. on the other. 

There is also some hair of V. Margaret Clitherowe and of V. Anne 
Lyne (Tyburn, February 27, 1601). 

But the most interesting of all is a collection of relics of the dear old 
martyr, Father Kemble. They bear the inscription by Monsignor Moyes : 
" Relics of the Martyr Father Kemble, received from Miss Hall, Italian 
Villa, Manchester, who received them from a member of F r Kemble's 
family. J. Moyes, June 12, 1907." 

On the paper that encloses them is written, " Relics of Father Kemble's 
Martyrdom." 

" A piece of the Coat, hair of the last priest who suffered for the Faith 
in England, also a bit of the rope with which he was hanged. 
F. Kemble." 

The lock of hair is enclosed in a torn letter, on which we read : 
" Hon rd S r 

" When you weare in towen I did my utmost indeauers to haue scene 
you but could noe waye obtaine.it, for I was with my mother y e next day 
after that shee had bin with you, but could not persuade the keeper to let 
us speak w th you, which was noe small truble to my mother to see you noe 
more, and to me not to see you at all : but all though I mist of y' hapi- 
nes, I hope I shal obtaine y' of hauing a part of your good prayers 
soe along with mv mother beging your blessing and prayers I remain! 
Hon* Deare . . . [MS. torn]. 
37 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

" I hope you will honour me w [id,] ... of your owne hands to 
s ... of your good health, my . . . presents our umble duty . . ." 

[Written from here sideways in the margin.] 

Endorsed on the back : " Mr. Kemble hare, cutt of 

before he Dyed." 

This is exceedingly interesting. It is clear that the lady who wrote 
this sent it in to the prison, and that Father Kemble cut off a lock of his 
hair, wrapped it in her letter, and sent it back to her. The relic of the 
old man's coat is brown in colour. 

At Lanherne, the old seat of the Arundels, where the light of the 
sanctuary has never been extinguished, the Carmelite nuns treasure, 
besides the skull of B. Cuthbert Mayne, ten remarkable portraits * 
and relics of about thirty martyrs. At the Franciscan Convent, Taunton, 
are many very precious relics, including a rib and a leg-bone (tibia, 
14 inches long) of V. Francis Bell, O.S.F. (Tyburn, December 11, 
1643), who was chaplain to this community when at Princenhoff, Bruges. 
An autograph letter of the same martyr, a tibia of V. John Baptist 
Bullaker, O.S.F. (12^ inches long), the linen corporal which he used at 
his last Mass, during which he was apprehended, and another dipped in 
his blood. They have also a tibia of V. Martin Woodcock, O.S.F. 
(Lancaster, August 7, 1646), a vertebra of V. John Wall, O.S.F.; 
the cord with which that seraphic martyr, V. Paul Heath, O.S.F., 
was hanged ; fingers of VV. John Roberts and Maurus Scott, O.S.B. ; 
the jawbone of V. Thomas Whitbread (the Jesuit Provincial who suffered 
for the Gates plot) ; in all, twenty-nine important relics, including the 
left arm of Archbishop Plunket, given to them by Mrs. Monington, of 
Sarnsfield, Worcestershire. 

The English Canonesses at Bruges have a yet more precious relic than 
any of these a vertebra of the neck of Blessed Thomas More. This is 
the only relic of his body in Catholic hands (except a tooth and small 
piece of bone at Stonyhurst), and it came to them through Father Henry 
More, S.J. Half of this relic is now at Roehampton. They have also 
a finger of Blessed Thomas Ford (Tyburn, May 28, 1582), together 
with his portrait, which came through Sister Catherine Willis, who was 
professed at Bruges in 1742, and who was a connection of the family. 
They had been brought to Belgium by the martyr's brother, an exile for 

* The portraits are those of VV. Fathers Ward, Bell (O.S.F.), Bullaker (O.S.F.), 
Heath (O.S.F.), Ducket, Corby (S.J.), Wright (S.J.), Morse (S.J.), Holland (S.J.), and 
Green (or Brooke). There is a legend that they were all painted by a Mr. Gifford, a 
fellow prisoner of the martyrs, in an almost miraculous manner. But the story, as told, 
will not fit in with the dates. 

371 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

the Faith. The relic consists of the last two joints of the little finger. 
It is white as wax, and set in a sort of small silver handle. This relic is 
credited with some remarkable cures. 

The Canonesses at Newton Abbot possess one of the most historically 
interesting of all the relics the hair-shirt of B. Thomas More. Of 
this I give an illustration, kindly lent me by the nuns. The story of 
this relic is so well known that I need not repeat it here, save to remind 
my readers that it was sent by the blessed martyr, the day before he 
suffered, to Margaret Roper, from whom it passed to his adopted child, 
Margaret Gigs, who married Dr. John Clements, and whose daughter 
founded the Community of St. Monica's, Louvain, now at Newton 
Abbot. A sleeve of this precious relic was given to Mother Margaret 
Hallahan, and is now treasured at Stone. Small portions are at Down- 
side ; St. Mary's, Cadogan Street ; St. Joseph's Church, Roehampton ; 
Ushaw, &c. This community also possess two autograph letters of 
V. William Howard, Viscount Stafford, written to his daughter Ursula, 
who was one of the Canonesses of St. Monica's. They seem, unfortu- 
nately, to have lost Sir Thomas More's rosary, which was once in their 
possession . 

At East Bergholt is part of the rope which hanged V. John 
Wall, O.S.F., and two relics of V. Robert Southwell (Tyburn, 
February 21, 1595), which are said to emit the beautiful odour which 
distinguishes this martyr's relics. Also a letter, 1 believe, of V. Francis 
Bell, O.S.F., describing his apprehension at Stevenage. 

The Benedictines of Downside Abbey possess one of the grandest 
collections of English martyr relics. Besides those already mentioned, 
they have the mutilated quarters of V. John Lockwood, O.S.B. (a 
confrater), and V. Edmund Catherick (York, April 13, 1642). These 
were rescued by Mary Poyntz, the faithful companion and successor of 
Mary Ward, and carried over to her convent at Augsburg. Here they 
remained, hidden beneath the altar in the infirmary, and almost forgotten, 
until they were obtained from the nuns by one of the monks of Down- 
side, and joyfully translated to their splendid church. They have also 
part of a rib of V. Ambrose Barlow, O.S.B., and many small relics of 
other martyrs, besides a crucifix that once belonged to Abbot Feckenham, 
and afterwards to V. Philip Powel, O.S.B. (Tyburn, June 30, 1646). 
One of their most interesting relics is that of the hair of V. Anne Lyne. 
This consists of " two beautiful little coils of fine hair which were found 
enclosed in separate papers, one of which had always been in possession 
of the community, while the other was brought from Lambspring. 
They were put together loosely in a glass tube by Dom Ethelbert 
Home, O.S.B., and he afterwards found that the hairs had twined them- 
372 




a, 



u 

M 



w 
rt 

O 



O 

in 



o PQ 



ffi 

CO 

01 

t-H 

BC 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

selves together in the shape of 8, with a small band across the middle. 
A single grey hair had taken the form of L." This is the more 
extraordinary, as the hairs were extremely brittle, and broke at the slightest 
pressure. 

At Clare Abbey, Darlington, were two fingers of V. John Roberts. 
The skin is of the colour of parchment, and it is in almost perfect 
preservation. On one finger is a label with the inscription, in a seven- 
teenth-century hand, " Beati Joannis Mervenia digitus sacerdotis et martyris 
Ordinis Sti Benedicts in Anglia." There is also a bone of the same 
martyr, and some other small relics. One of the fingers of Dom Roberts 
was given by the nuns to the writer, and the other was subsequently 
given to the Benedictines of Downside. 

At St. Mary's Convent, York, besides the hand of V. Margaret 
Clitherowe, there are about twenty different relics, including a piece of the 
rope (apparently only two strands) with which V. Nicholas Postgate was 
hanged ; and some large pieces of blood-stained linen belonging to a 
martyr unknown. Most of these came from Oscott, and were given 
by Father Haigh, of Erdington, to the Convent. Others were given by 
Father Morris. It is strange that there are not more important relics 
at this famous old convent, which weathered the storm of persecution in 
the penal days.* 

At Oscott there are still several relics of V. Nicholas Postgate and 
V. Thomas Thwing, the most interesting of which is a piece of linen 
stuff lined with canvas, with a button-hole in one corner, and with the 
inscription, " Mr. Poskefs cape he woore 30 yeare." These relics belonged 
to a Mrs. Juliana Dorrington, a pious Catholic lady, who lived many 
years at Old Oscott, and died there in 1731. 

At St. Cuthbert's, Old Elvet, Durham, besides the right hand of 
Father Postgate, there are two locks of his white hair, his entire lower 
jaw-bone, and one of the vertebrae of the spine. There is also the jaw-bone 
of V. Thomas Thwing (which still has four teeth on the right side and 
three on the left) and one of his vertebras. 

In the Catholic Church at Monmouth are preserved the chalice, 
altar, missal and bookstand used for many years by V. John Kemble. 
They have already been illustrated in these pages. The altar is made 
of two carved oak tables, or, rather, wide benches, one on the top 
of the other, so that, when not used for Mass, they could be separated 
and placed as benches on either side of the attic which formed the chapel. 
The altar-stone is fixed in an oaken case, and is of Bath-stone (oolite) ; 

* One relic here is remarkable ; as it purports to be the blood of N. Wilkes, secular 
priest, who died in York Castle under sentence of death, 1642. I think there must be 
some mistake here. 

373 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

it is now let into the upper table. The bookstand was very ingeniously 
made by the martyr himself out of one single board. It closes up very 
small, in order to facilitate its being hidden. The chalice was recovered 
by the Rev. Thomas Abbot, then priest of Monmouth, from a Protestant 
farmer's family, in the neighbourhood of the Castle, in whose possession 
it had remained since the sack of the Castle at the martyr's apprehension, 
and who used it as a drinking-cup at their harvest-feasts. It was repaired 
by Messrs. Hardman and reconsecrated by Bishop Browne, O.S.B., in 
1839. ^he m i ssa ' contains some MS. prayers written in the martyr's 
own hand. There is also at Monmouth a fourteenth-century chasuble, 
embroidered with the Crucifixion and angels catching the Precious Blood 
in chalices. This has a remarkable history : 

" It appears that during the fiercest strife of the penal times two 
priests, named Jones and Powell, took the " Cross Keys Inn " at Holy- 
well ; the one acting as landlord, the other as ostler. At this inn the' 
faithful yeomen would pull up for the purpose of obtaining bodily 
refreshment (as their Calvinistic neighbours thought), but in reality to 
obtain refreshment for their souls, for on Sundays and other convenient 
times Holy Mass was said in that wayside inn. At length the two 
priests came to the conclusion that it was selfish for both to remain at 
Holywell when so many Catholics were struggling on in South Wales 
without the sacraments, and so Mr. Jones came to Monmouth, bringing 
this chasuble with him. The vestment, after his death, was cut up into 
small pieces and hidden away by some one who was afraid it might be 
found in his possession. Father Abbot found the fragments stowed 
away in a loft, and had it restored and repaired. This splendid old 
vestment is priceless." * 

At West Grinstead are some relics of V. Francis Bell, O.S.F., who 
seems to have ministered there as missionary priest. They were found 
under the altar. They consist of a part of his backbone, a bit of the 
leather of his sandals, and some of his hair-shirt. But the most interesting 
of all is an autograph letter written from Newgate. It ends : " All that 
I aske of any is that St. Andrew begged of the people, ' ne impedirent 
passionem,' God's holy will be done in ceternum. 

" Your poor brother, 

"November 12, 1643." "FRANCIS BELL.| 

* St. Peter's Chair, October 1893. 

f The late Mr. Grissell of Oxford had a little MS. book entirely written by this martyr. 
It contains an account of his family and of his own life, and some coats of arms painted by 
his own hand. The last entry is the most interesting : " Anno 1634 missus sum in Anglian 
ad convertendum animas ad fidem catholicam," This with the other relics of Mr. Grissell's 
magnificent collection are now kept in a chapel in St. Aloysius' Church, Oxford. There 
are, however, but few relics of our martyrs. 

374 




"> I ?)*' I "^ >L ^ J 

^ J 5 <* t * * 1 . : 2 \ rS * * 

^lilll^UtH 

i\> '<- B, . ' * * & _.<- ... "^ S-A- 5 



1 



a' \- ^r 



? . <* s* 

C 3 S -- 



ftj 



il 



* 

:* 



*& % i 53- g' S ^ ' 



I -s-*.-r r = ^ g~V* 







u 



l 



W-i g 

KC. 
h ?'? 



**< C 5! E- 

O p e 

^ Wj ^ 

-^< "^ ^ ** 




THE GEORGE AND A CRUCIFIX 
OF BLESSED THOMAS MORE 

Now at Stonyhurst College 




THE WATCH AND WATCH-CASE WORN BY 
THE VENERABLE WILLIAM HOWARD, VIS- 
COUNT STAFFORD, AT HIS MARTYRDOM 

Now in possession of the Lady Stafford. Photo by the author 

To face page 374 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

At Husbands Bosworth Hall, the seat of Mr. Oswald Petre-Turville, 
is preserved a very beautiful relic of the martyr, B. Adrian Fortescue 
(beheaded, Tower Hill, July 9, 1539). It consists of the Book of Hours 
constantly used by the martyr, and since his beatification it has been kept 
in a shrine in the church. On the front page Sir Adrian has written 
some beautiful maxims, a kind of rule of life, which he has signed at the 
end, "Adryan ffortescue." Curiously enough, not far off, at Newnham 
Paddox, there is the Book of Hours of another martyr, B. Thomas More. 
This most precious little book was used by the blessed martyr when 
imprisoned in the Tower, and it also has some autograph prayers written 
in the margin, which are of exquisite beauty and pathos. They begin 
thus : 

" Give me Thy grace, good God, 
To sette the world at naught ; 

To sette my minde faste upon Thee and not to hange 
uppon the blaste of mennys mowthis." 
***** 

" Of worldly substance, frendys, libertie, lyfe and all 

to sett the loss at right nowght for the wynning of Christ. 
To think my moste enemys mye beste frendys 

for the brethren of Joseph could never have done him so 
much goode with their love and favour, as they did hym 
with their malice and hatred." 

The third great layman among the Beati has also left a MS. book of 
prayer, but this seems to be entirely written in his own hand. I refer to 
the prayer-book of B. Thomas Percy, Earl of Northumberland, a price- 
less volume, lately in possession of Mr. George Browne of Troutbeck, 
Kendal. This prayer-book is referred to by Sander in the De Visibili 
Monarchia Eccksice. As it has been fully described in the Ushaw Magazine, 
by the Rev. George Phillips, I need not do more than refer to it. I give 
an illustration of two pages. 

Another relic of B. Thomas More is his rosary-ring, in possession of 
the Trappes family. This consists of a hoop with a bezel engraved with 
the I.H.S., and ten knobs whereon to count the A*ves. A somewhat 
similar ring, said to have belonged to B. Edmund Campion, is at Farm 
Street. That of B. Thomas More is said to have come through Mother 
Mary More (the last survivor of the family), who was Superior of the 
English Convent, Bruges. 

At Hendred House, Berks, the seat of the Eyston family, is, as before 
mentioned, the can or drinking-cup of B. Thomas More, and the walking- 
staff of B. John Fisher, which he carried to the scaffold. 

Some very precious vestments used by martyrs are in the possession 
of Mr. Herbert, of Helmsley Hall, near York. They belonged to the 

375 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

Thwing family, of which the late Mrs. Herbert was a member, and must 
have been used by the two martyrs of that family V. Edward (Lancaster, 
July 26, 1600) and V.Thomas Thwing (York, October 23, 1680). One 
of the chasubles is an exceedingly beautiful Gothic vestment, 51 inches 
long and 37 inches wide, made of crimson velvet pile, with a cross and 
pillar of green satin, embroidered on the back with the Assumption of 
Our Lady and Seraphs. The other is of woollen brocade, woven in 
crimson, green and white ; evidently in order that it might be used for 
any of these colours. It is also Gothic in shape. The palla preserved 
with these vestments possesses a special interest, having still attached 
to it by small solid-headed pins the linen pall, as used by the martyrs. 
These vestments were lent to the convent at York, and exhibited at 
the Ransomers' pilgrimage there at Whitsuntide. 

At Farm Street are a quantity of relics collected by the late Father 
Morris, but they are mostly quite small ones, as the larger ones he placed 
at Roehampton. Others are portions of larger ones at Stonyhurst and 
elsewhere. I therefore pass them over. The relics belonging to the 
Huddlestone family, of Sawston Hall, near Cambridge, are also very 
small, but are exceedingly interesting as some of them are very rare. 
They are chiefly of the martyrs of the time of the Oates plot. Two 
seem to be unique, those of V. John Grove and V. John Lloyd. There 
is also some straw with a very puzzling inscription, apparently in Portu- 
guese, which is almost indecipherable. It apparently reads : " Da esteira 
em que forao martyrisados il noster geroues [Grove ?] e noster ? Lomda " 
[Ireland?] /'.." From the straw on which were martyred our (?) and 
our (?) " (or perhaps, " in London "). But almost every word has to be 
guessed at, and I have no idea what martyrs can be meant. 

The spelling of the inscriptions attached to these relics is remarkable. 
Thus, Archbishop Plunket becomes " the holy B : plompin " ; V. John 
Grove is "Mr. Growfe " ; V. John Lloyd, " F. Flouid " ; and straw is 
spelt " stray." 

The Carmelites at Chichester have some interesting relics, fifty-four 
in all, of twenty-eight English martyrs. They (like those of Colwich) 
have been lost sight of for many years and were only found again in 1906. 
Among the rarer relics are the following : " Of the Bloud & of the 
haire girdle of the Venerable-M. Father William Harcourt." This is a 
large mass of horse-hair, as a relic it is unique. Another is inscribed : 
" Un peu du cceur propre du perre irlandt [Fr. Ireland] con a tire hor du 
feu un de la premier Exsecutte." 

Most of these relics are of the Oates plot martyrs. 

We now come to the great relics at Stonyhurst, which, indeed, in 
regard to their importance, ought almost to have had the first place. 
37 6 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

The relics of the Beati were contained in four mahogany boxes, lined with 
crimson velvet.* The inscriptions are in red ink in a very early hand. 
One of the most touching is the rope of B. Edmund Campion. It seems 
to be nearly twelve feet long. There are in the same case relics of 
BB. John Fisher, Thomas Ford, William Filby, Ralph Sherwin (a knuckle- 
bone), Luke Kirby (a phalanx of foot), and Edmund Campion (blood- 
stained linen). In another case is a most precious corporal, on which 
five martyrs said Mass when imprisoned in the Tower. Their names are 
embroidered in red silk on the linen (BB. Luke Kirby, Robert Johnson, 
Alexander Briant, S.J., John Shert, and Thomas Cottam, S.J.). But the 
most intrinsically precious, as well as the most interesting, are, of course, 
the famous More relics. As these have been described in Father 
Bridget's " Life of B. Thomas More " (Appendix), I need not do more 
than refer to them. They consist of the " George," a most splendid 
jewel of priceless value ; two crucifixes (one of which contained a relic of 
St. Thomas the Apostle), the martyr's seal (as Sub-Treasurer of England), 
a cameo with the head of Our Lady, a crystal and silver reliquary 
containing one of the martyr's teeth and a piece of thick bone ; and a 
shell (tiger cowrie) made into a pouncet-box. In another case are Sir 
Thomas's curiously embroidered cap and his hat. I give an illustration 
of the " George." 

Other relics of B. Thomas More, consisting of a sword, a small 
clock, &c., are in the possession of Mrs. Forman, who is descended 
from the martyr in the female line. 

There is also at Stonyhurst an old reliquary, containing a thumb of 
V. Robert Sutton (Stafford, July 27, 1587), which was given to F. John 
Gerard, S.J., by the martyr's brother, and by him enclosed in this 
reliquary, as he tells us in his autobiography. Besides this, there are 
some large bones of one of the Durham martyrs, an eye of V. 
Edward Oldcorne, S.J., and a very elaborate silver spoon, parcel gilt, in 
a curious case, which is said to have belonged to B. Richard Whiting, 
O.S.B., last Abbot of Glastonbury. This spoon is dated 1500. The 
handle terminates in a female bust growing from a vine-stock, doubled 
and twisted, and bearing leaves. It closes up, to fit into a case. When 
open, a ferule slips over the hinge and keeps the handle in position ; on 
the front of this ferule is engraved a human head. The case is made of 
parchment which has been moulded into its present shape while wet, and is 
covered with thin black skin, probably moleskin, the joint down the side 
being so delicate as to be hardly perceptible. The history of this relic 

* Quite recently they have been translated into reliquaries of crystal and silver gilt, 
which can be exposed on the altar. I give illustrations of two of these, from photographs 
kindly supplied by the Very Rev. Father Rector of Stonyhurst. 

3B 377 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

is, unfortunately, at present forgotten, and it is not known how it came 
to Stonyhurst. Besides these great relics, there are quantities of small 
relics of various martyrs which it would be tedious to enumerate here. 

In the sacristy of St. Joseph's Church, Roehampton, is a large case 
of relics, collected and arranged by Father John Morris, SJ. Besides 
the relics of B. Thomas More already mentioned, there are about thirty- 
eight other relics. There are, for instance, large bones of W. John 
Lockwood, Edmund Catherick (from Augsburg), Robert Southwell, 
S.J., and of two Douay martyrs whose names are unknown. There are 
also pieces of linen dipped in the blood of VV. Thomas Thwing, 
William Plessington (Chester, July 19, 1679), J^ n Wall, O.S.F., 
Thomas Garnet, S.J., John Almond, John Southworth, &c. Two of 
the most interesting are a bone of B. Edmund Campion, being half 
of the relic preserved at the Gesu (and which is, in all probability, the 
martyr's thumb), and a piece of the hat which he wore when paraded 
through the streets in mockery. On it was fastened a paper bearing the 
inscription : " Campion, the seditious Jesuit." There is also a large 
piece of the rope with which V. David Henry Lewis, S.J. (alias Charles 
Baker), was hung at Usk (August 27, 1679), and a tooth of V. 
Thomas Whitbread, S.J. (from Taunton) ; also a piece of blood-stained 
linen in a paper bearing the inscription : " The keeper of the presort said 
cirtanly he was a St. all that saw him die thought no less pay \_pray~\ prize 
this." We do not know to what martyr this refers. There are also two 
relics ofV. Richard White (Wrexham, October 17, 1584), which are the 
only ones existing, as far as I know. 

At Manresa House is preserved a copy of the Summa of St. Thomas 
Aquinas, which belonged to B. Edmund Campion, and contains many 
notes in his own hand. Another book that apparently once belonged to 
a Jesuit martyr, is a missal in possession of the Lady Catherine Berkeley, 
which bears the curious inscription : " ^Alexandra Brianto Alexander 
Farnesius." This certainly suggests the idea that the famous Duke of 
Parma gave the book to B. Alexander Briant, who may have come under 
his notice when a student at Douay. At the end of the books are some 
prayers written in the same hand. 

At Erdington Abbey there are relics of about forty martyrs, the most 
important of which are a finger of V. John Roberts, O.S.B. ; a bone, 
about three inches long and also part of a rib, of V. Ambrose Barlow, 
O.S.B. ; the palla used by V. Martin Woodcock, O.S.F., at his last 
Mass ; and a large piece of the hat of B. Edmund Campion. This last 
relic is doubly interesting, as the hat in question belonged first to 
S. Francis Borgia, S.J., who gave it to B. Edmund when he was leaving 
Rome. It is now kept at the old Jesuit College (now the Episcopal 
37 8 




THE CLAUGHTON CHALICE FROM 
MAINS HALL 

Probably used by Blessed Edmund Campion 



To face page 378 



RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

Seminary) at Prague. It is made of black felt. There are also some 
large pieces of linen soaked in the blood of V. David Lewis, S.J., 
V. Oliver Plunket, V. Henry Heath, and V. John Wall. The palla 
already referred to is covered on the upper side with light blue diapered 
silk. In the centre is a broad Greek cross of light gold-coloured silk, 
which is outlined with a twisted silk lace of a brighter yellow. The 
same lace is used to border the palla. 

At Claughton-on-Brock, in Lancashire, are two interesting relics of 
V. Thomas Whitaker, who once served this district. The one is a plain 
oak desk in which the martyr stored his vestments and other things 
necessary for holy Mass ; and the other a box, about seven inches square, 
in which he used to keep the Blessed Sacrament. This is elaborately 
carved on the panels. These relics came through the Midgeall family, 
with whom the martyr lived. 

We give an illustration of the latter placed on an old missionary altar 
which belongs to Mr. Fitzherbert Brockholes of Claughton Hall. The 
Pre-Reformation crucifix, like the altar itself, comes from Mains (or 
Monks') Hall, the ancient seat of the Hesketh family, which was visited 
by Blessed Edward Campion on his missionary journey in Lancashire in 
1581. I think the altar (which, as it will be seen, is of the bureau type) 
cannot be older than the early part of the eighteenth century, but the 
crucifix is a beautiful specimen of a mediaeval processional cross. A still 
greater treasure at Claughton is the magnificent Pre-Reformation chalice, 
which also comes from Mains, and which was used, there can be very 
little doubt, by the Blessed Edmund himself when he said Mass at Mains. 

By Mr. Fitzherbert Brockholes's kindness I am able to give an 
illustration of this beautiful relic. It closely resembles that preserved in 
the Catholic church at Hornby in the same county, but the Claughton 
one is, perhaps, the more beautiful and elaborate of the two. 

Its date is the latter half of the fifteenth century, or perhaps the first 
decade of the sixteenth. The kind of calix at the base of the bowl is, how- 
ever, a modern addition. The knot, formed with six lobes, is extremely 
beautiful. Between the lobes above and below are pierced and traceried 
compartments. The foot is mullet-shaped, five of its compartments 
being filled with I H C and X P C alternately, while the sixth has the 
crucifix. 

Small knobs are attached to the points of the mullet foot in the 
manner of toes, and these add greatly to the artistic effect of the whole.* 

Beautiful and precious as this chalice is, the thought that it was 
probably used at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass by one of the greatest 

See English Medieval Chalices and Patens, by W. H. St. John Hope and T. M. Fallow, 
in the Archaeological Journal, vol. xliii. p. 147. 

379 



FORGOTTEN SHRINES 

of all our martyrs, adds immeasurably to its value, and it is a joy to think 
that it still remains in Catholic hands. The present writer has himself 
had the privilege of using it. 

At St Scholastica's Abbey, Teignmouth, is preserved a very interesting 
and beautiful old reliquary crucifix of which we give an illustration. 

The tradition about this precious cross is that it was dug up at 
Fountains Abbey, and it is supposed to have been the pectoral cross of 

one of the Abbots of that great Cistercian 
house. It is silver, and the cross is circular 
in section, and grooved to resemble the 
bark of a tree. In the back, at the 
centre, is fixed a tooth. Three ends of 
the cross (i.e., the top and the two arms) 
also contain relics, and on the silver ends 
are engraved initials as follows : At the 
top R.B., at the right arm M.C., and at 
the left, T.H. There has also been an 
inscription at the bottom, but it is so 
much battered (and there is moreover a 
hole through the letters) that it is impos- 
sible to do more than guess what it was, 
though it looks like H.P. We can give 
no conjecture as to the names represented 
by these initials. 

Curiously enough, there is a precisely similar crucifix at the 
Franciscan Convent, Taunton. If the Teignmouth one was really 
dug up at Fountains Abbey, this must be a copy of it. The only 
distinction between them is that there are no relics at the ends, nor 
initials. But a tooth is inserted in the back, exactly as in the Teign- 
mouth one. The nuns do not seem to have any notion as to how 
or from whom they received the cross ; there is, however, a tradition 
that it is a tooth of V. John Wall, O.S.F., the martyr of Harvington 
Hall. 

The Teignmouth nuns have no tradition as to the relics in their 
cross, but they think that the cross was brought to them by Lady 
Abbess Messenger, of the Benedictine Monastery at Pontoise, who was 
a relation of the owners of Fountains Abbey, and who joined their 
community with three others when the Pontoise nuns, owing to their 
extreme poverty, were obliged to disperse. If the cross were dug up at 
Fountains in its present state the relics cannot be those of English 
martyrs, nor do all the initials correspond with the names of martyrs 
known to us. However, the relics may have been added later. Personally, 
380 




The Mcrtyc) tootk 
Set In t>ocK of Crcyy. 




RELICS OF THE BLESSED 
ENGLISH MARTYRS FROM 
STONYHURST COLLEGE 

The corporal on which Jive Beati saia 
Mass in the Tower 
The rope with which Blessed Edmund 
Campion was bound, and other relics 
of the Beati 




THE THUMB OF THE 
VENERABLE ROBERT 
SUTTON 

In the original reliquary given 
by Fr. John Gerard, S.jf., noiv 
preserved at Stonyhurst College 



To face page 380 




RELICS OF THE ENGLISH MARTYRS 

however, we are inclined to suspect that the crucifix is not of such an 
early date as the tradition of its origin would suggest. 

Some mention must be made of the relics of the last Englishman who 
suffered during the persecution. V. William Howard, Viscount Stafford, 
was beheaded on the Feast of St. Thomas of Canterbury, December 29, 
1680. Many secondary relics of this glorious martyr are preserved by 
his descendants ; for instance, the shirt in which he suffered, and the 
furniture of his Chapel are in the possession of Mr. 
Howard of Corby. The two relics figured here, are 
the martyr's watch, with its curious old silver case, and 
the diamond pendant which he wore on the scaffold. 
The former is in possession of the Lady Stafford, 
and the latter belongs to Lord Stafford and is pre- 
served at Costessy. I owe the photograph from 
which the drawing of the pendant is taken to the 
kindness of Mr. Stafford H. Jerningham. The jewel 
is exceedingly brilliant and beautiful, and is composed 
of large diamonds. The drawing gives but an imper- 
fect idea of its beauty. The pendant was recently LORD STAFFORD>S 

. ' . T-> l M ill- DIAMOND PENDANT 

shown at the very interesting Art Exhibition held m 

connection with the first National Congress at Leeds in August 1910, 

where it excited great admiration. 

With this splendid treasure, this account of our martyrs' relics may 
come to a close here. It is necessarily very brief and incomplete, but I think 
most of the more important relics have been mentioned.* If this account 
of them elicits information as to further treasures as yet unknown to me, I 
shall be amply repaid for the trouble of writing it. I must acknowledge 
my obligations to Father John Pollen, S.J., who has kindly placed at my 
disposal the papers of the late Father Morris, and to many other friends 
who have most kindly assisted me in my inquiries. 

* I find that I have notes of relics of about 107 different marytrs, besides several 
anonymous relics. Of the following I only know of one relic : B. Thomas Beche, 
Abbot of Colchester (pectoral cross belonging to Lord Clifford) ; V. Roger Cadwallader 
(bone, Stonyhurst), V. John Carey (finger, Bruges), V. Roger Filcock, S.J. (Stonyhurst), 
V. Matthew Flathers (Bruges), V. John Grove (Sawston), B. Evcrard Hanse (blood, 
Westminster), V. William Harrington (Colwich), Lawrence Hill (Colwich), V. Francis 
Ingelby (hand, Taunton), B. Robert Johnson and B. John Short (corporal, Stonyhurst), 
V. Richard Langhorne (Colwich, part now at Downside), V. John Lloyd, S.J. (Sawston), 
V. Francis Page, S.J. (Stonyhurst), B. Thomas Percy, V. John Robinson (Stonyhurst), 
B. Richard Thirkeld (Colwich), V. Margaret Ward (Colwich), V. Richard White (Roe- 
hampton), (?) Wilks, (?) Confessor Priest (York). There are none at all of most of Henry 
VIII.'s victims. 

381 



APPENDIX A 

[Set page 35] 

LETTERS PATENT OF QUEEN ELIZABETH, NOMINATING 
SIR WALTER ASTON, KNIGHT, RICHARD BAGOTT, 
THOMAS TRENTHAM, AND JOHN VERNON, ESQUIRES, 
ARBITRATORS IN THE DISPUTE BETWEEN SIR THOMAS 
FITZHERBERT AND HIS NEPHEW, THOMAS FITZHER- 
BERT, ESQUIRE 

IF THEY CANNOT COME TO A FINAL DECISION THEY ARE 
TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE ROYAL CHANCERY 
BEFORE THE MORROW OF CANDLEMAS FOLLOWING 

DATED DECEMBER 5, 29 ELIZABETH, 1586 
[No. 30 of the Norbury deeds at Swynnerton] 

Elizabeth, dei gratia Anglic ffrancie & hibernie Regina fidei defensor, &c. 
Dilecto et fideli suo Waltero Aston militi ac dilectis sibi Ricardo Bagott Armigero 
Thome Trentham Armigero & Johanni Vernon Armigero salutem. Cum varie 
lites & controversie nuper orte et mote sint inter Thomam ffitzherbert 
militem ex una parte et Thomam ffitzherbert Armigerum ex altera parte Ac ipsi 
ex eorum mutuo assensu et consensu easdem materias per vos finaliter determinandas 
vestro arbitrio comisere vestroque in premissis iudicio stare decreverunt Sciatis 
igitur quod nos de fidelitatibus & providis circumspectionibus vestris plurimum 
confidentes assignavimus vos ac tenore presentium damus vobis vel tribus vestrum 
potestatem & auctoritatem materias predictas audiendi et examinandi & finaliter 
si poteritis determinandi. Et ideo vobis vel tribus vestrum mandamus quod ad 
cunctos dies et loca quos ad hoc provideritis tarn partes predictas quam testes 
quoscunque quos maxime pro testificatione veritatis in hac parte fore videritis 
necessarios & oportunos coram vobis vel tribus vestrum venire faciatis & evocetis. 
Ac ipsos testes & eorum quemlibet per se separatim tune ibidem de & super 
quibusdam Interrogatoriis per partes predictas seu earundem partem alteram vobis 
vel tribus vestrum deliberandi super sacramenta sua coram vobis vel tribus vestrum 
persanctadei evangelia corporaliter prestanda diligenter examinetis examinationesque 
suas recipiatis et in scriptis redigatis de materia & probationibus in eisdem per vos 
plenius intellectis & animadversis auditisque hinc inde partium predictarum 
rationibus et invicem propositis et proponendis allegationibus intellectaque totius 
rei veritate easdem materias omnibus viis modis et mediis quibus melius sciveritis 
aut poteritis iuxta sanas discretiones & consciencias vestras finaliter ut predictum 
est si poteritis determinetis. Ac si materias predictas finaliter ut predictum est 

383 



APPENDIX A 

determinare non poteritis, nos cujus defectu id exequi non poteritis ac de toto facto 
et iudicio vestro in premissis in Cancellariam nostram in crastino Purificationis beate 
Marie proxime future ubicunque tune fuerit sub sigillis vestris vel trium vestrum 
distincte et apte reddatis certiores hoc breve nobis remittentes ut ulterius inde fieri 
faciamus quod de iure fuerit faciendum. Teste me ipsa apud Westmonasterium. 
quinto die decembris anno regni nostri vicesimo nono. 

P. GERRARD 



384 



APPENDIX B 

[See page 61 supra] 

ARTICLES AGAINST WILLIAM BASSETT* 

[Note : the passages in italics are underlined in the original MS.'] 

34 ELIZ. Articles against William Bassett Esquire now Sheriff of 
Derbyshire, preferred by Thomas Fitzherbert her Majesty's sworn 
servant under his hand & seal in her Majesty's hand. 

A brief of such articles as be delivered to the Queens most excellent 
Majesty from Thomas Fitzherbert Esq re her highness' sworn servant 
under his hand sealed against William Bassett of Langlays & Blore in 
Derbyshire Esquire. 

1. William Bassett was brought up in his uncle 
Sir Thomas Fitzherberts house under these many 
popish priests and schoolmasters, to wit, Robert 
Gray, Robert Hyll, John Morryn, Thos. Collier, 
William Batersby, Rich. Gray, all priests and 
Martin Audlaye a civilian, all traitorous affected 
persons as Sir Thomas Fitzherbert himself was. 
And so were his cousin Germayne, Thomas now 
here and George at Rome a Jesuit, Nicholas 
servant unto Cardinal Allen as his secretary, francis 
a barefooted friar, Anthony that hath received 
seminary priests, Thomas Fitzherbert of S wynnerton 
a notorious traitor and pensioner of the King of 
Spain and of ye Scott. Queen while she lived and 
divers others little better. 

2. William Bassett hath been affected to bad 
persons in allegiance as to the Lord Paget the 

traitor. So as he commanded William Copwood by Richard Dakyn 

a letter which he sent from London (when the 

Lord Paget fled) to rid his two homes Langley and 

Blore and to make away all letters and other 

matters that concerned the Lord Paget. So did 

Copwood and one Richard Dakyn then help him Wm. Copwood 

as he can tell by good tokens. 

3. William Bassett keepeth in his house and park 
at Langlay one Thomas Thomson and his wife 
recusants and the husband long was in prison and 
outlawed for recusancy, the wife is his launderer and 
he calleth her his noone [?] 

* Harl. 6998, f. 248 

3C 385 



He will not deny that he 
was so brought up ; and It 
appears in Martyn Audlay's 
examination, pag : 



John Britelbank himself to 
be had 

George Raworth. 

Ric Dakyn and his book 
of Accounts Extant of 5000 
reckoning he being and dakyn 
is a plain simple man 



APPENDIX B 

4. W m Bassett in a 1588 received a letter from 
Thomas Fitzherbert of Swynnerton his dearest 
darling and Spanish traitor by his man John Britel- 
bank wherein Thomas writes for money and did 
promise repayment when the fleet should come shortly 
whereupon Bassett commanded Richard Dakyn then 
keeper of his money to deliver 10 to George 
Raworthe another servant to go to hunt the hare 
and Brytelbank should see Raworth throw down 
that bag of _io into a bush and take it up for his 
master Thomas Fitzherbert of Swynnerton & 
carry it to him & Brittelbank was asked by 
Dakyn if he had not found the hare whereunto 
Brittelbank answered ' Yea I have her here ' and 
Bassett clapped him on the breast and said they 
would be here shortly. 

And he called for Dakyn's book wherein he had 
entered nothing of his own handwriting before, 
Bassett did then write, Received by my self jiO 
and for fear of suspicion and to remember to 
whom it was sent or given, he did write over 
these words (myself) vide ct Bruse bone or Boanc 
Brewse. 

5. William Bassett did know assuredly that one 
Todd was a massing priest taken with two other 
Seminary priests Bodlam [sic] & Garlick executed as 
traitors at Derby. Todd continuing in the Gaol 
at Derby, when Bassett's cousin Mr. Dethick was John Bamford 
sheriff he did send for Todd out of prison to Rich : Dakyn 
his house Langlay and kept him in his house there a Ralf Maison, Gaoll* of Darby 
month or 6 weeks in anno 1591. So hath he 
received Sir Walter Barlow a priest out of the gaol at 
Stafford when himself was sheriff of that shire & 
by that priest's labour granted a Gaolership unto 

harby there in anno [blank in MS.]. And in that Harby Gaoller of Staff, 
year Robert Sutton the Lord Paget's traitorous 
priest being condemned for treason, Bassett dealt 
secretly with him, Sutton desiring that he might 
live but to reveal matters of great importance and 
treason touching England and her Majesty, but 
Bassett would not stay execution which he might 
have done, lest the priest had discovered more 
matters than Bassett would have liked (as men 
judge) & Dakyn Bassett's cook did make the 
priest Caudles and about that time when letters 
were sent down to the old Earl of Shrewsbury to 
apprehend Richard Fitzherbert & Martin Audlay 
386 



APPENDIX B 

and Seminary priests at Norbury Sir Thomas Fitz- 
herbert's house, Bassett did send Randall Swynnerton 
to give warning to Richard Fitzherbert to fly 
away. 

6. W m Bassett did send for Rich : Gray a traitor- 
ous priest from Buxtons or from Langford to 
Langlay his own house & there entertained him 
gave him venison & desired him to go & make a 
Concorde betwixt his cousin Henry Sacheverell and his 
wife which Gray did & since Michaelmas last 

Bassett received a Seminary priest, as Mr. P 

sayth. 

7. W m Bassett practised upon his uncle Sir 
Thomas Fitzherbert committing [sic] for Treason 
to Lambeth house with one John Sherrat that he 
should steal away a casket locked of Sir Tho : Fitz- 
herberfs where it was hidden with other traitorous 
matter, & after Bassett had it in his hands he did 
break it open iff found therein both assurance of 
Lands of the said Traitor's Thomas of Swynnerton 
his said darling and letters of importance sent from 
the one of those traitors to another. A disloyal 
presumption & offence & he dispersed other caskets 
locked full of other writings at his pleasure which 
were that arch traitor's Sir Thos. Fitzherbert his 
uncle's to the great hindrance of her Majesty's 
Service, he having warning to the contrary. 

8. W m Bassett hath conversed with & enter- 
tained at his houses Nigromancers as Thomas Allen 
of Oxford being together at Langlay 12 or 13 
years past sent Richard Johnson for a smith's 
steddy & hammer. They did all watch when 
the sun should come to the noon stead & the 
very prick of noon and then if the sun did shine 
the hammer should strike upon the stethy * 3 times 
together. After W m Bassett should have answer 
truly made to such questions as he should demand 
by a voice or vision. But so it chanced that the 
sun did not shine nor they could discern the true 
hour & thereupon Allen said that a year's labour 
was lost. As John being one of the 3 told Richard 
Dakyn. 

9. W m Bassett hath long since and lately had 
great trust in Nigromancers and Astrologers, & 

* Steady or stithy : a blacksmith's anvil. 



Ric Cotton 
Ric Dakyn 
Randall Swynnerton 



Ric Dakyn 
John Bamford 



Jhon Sherratt's examina- 
tion extant 



yhon 'Bamford 
Rich. Topcliff 



Ric. Dakyn 

Ric. Johnson 

A Smith at Langlay 



387 



APPENDIX B 

hath said that one of his own house should put him 
in danger & be betrayed and perceived the same 
by his owne nativity that was cast & was written 
in a reddish gilded book covered with leather & 
gilded leaves about 2 fingers thick, in which many 
things he blotted out for fear and this he did speak 
one time when W m Copwood & he fell out 
being his man. As Dakyn heard. 

He and his master's men did call it the book of 
their master's fortune. 

And by that means Bassett would often speake 
of his own marriage. 

10. W m Bassett about Michaelmas last had at 
Langlay one M r Davis a setter of figures & Allen 
also ; At which time Bassett did speak this or 
like words to Randall Swynnerton v* what a world 
is this Randall if a man should be sheriff at the death 
cf a prince, what wonders might a sheriff then do & 
work at that time, y about Lenten now 2 years past 
Davis was at Langlay with a trunk full of books 
& he did give Davis a horse and an armour 
valued at 100, the horse called Bay Lewcye. 

1 1 . W m Bassett hath used to say before his 
servants sometimes secretly sometimes more openly 
that he should be as great a man ere he died as any 
was in his country and thereof he was sure. 

W m Bassett since he had his cousin Thomas 
Fitzherbert in his house prisonner, one reported part 
of the Lord Keeper's oration or speech before the 
Queen's Majesty in the Parliament House of the 
preparing of the Spaniard for a new invasion into 
England by Scotland. Then in a bravery W m 
Bassett said Well I shall be as great a man in Spain 
as any is in my Country & further threatened Thomas 
Fitzherbert that he would be revenged of him (being 
his prisoner) for the death of his good uncle Sir Thomas 
Fitzherbert & either break Thomas Fitzherbert's 
back or his own. And so hath Bassett often 
threatened his cousin Thos Fitzherbert, Bassett 
having knowledge and sight of Sir Thomas Fitz- 
herbert his uncle's treasons. When Mr. Top- 
cliffe was sent down to Norbury Sir Thomas' house 
to search for his traitorous matter hidden. At 
which time Mr. Bassett walked up & down by 
the table when a foul spider was found by Mr. 
Topcliffe in his milk prepared for his breakfast by 
388 



Ric Dakyn 



John Bamford 
Randall Swynnerton 



Ric Dakyn and most of 
his men. 



Ric Cotton 

John Bamford 

S r ceant Fowller 

Thos. Fitzherbert himself 



Ric. Topcliffe 



APPENDIX B 

2 or 3 women in the house whose husbands fathers 
and friends had been lately committed to prison in 
London, for Sir Thomas's and their own treasons &c. 

Bassett would needs persuade Topcliffe that it 
was not a spider but a humble bee. But Topcliffe 
told Bassett that he did find the leggs & if Bassett 
would find the wings then he would believe Bassett 
that it was a humble bee. 

W m Bassett being in the Lowe Countries with 
the Earl of Leicester was desirous to return. W ra 

Bassett devised that Randall Swynnerton should Randall Swynnerton 
counterfeit a letter in the name of some person in 
England signifying Bassett that it were convenient 
for him to come over for suits touching his cousin 
Langford. W m Bassett by that device returned 
over and after lodging at Skinner's, Bassett and 
Francis Leake fell foully out, and Randall Swyn- 
nerton thereupon persuading W ra Bassett to fight 
with Francis Leake. W m Bassett did answer 
Swynnerton to this effect. Sir Randall let me 
alone. By the death of God (& clapped his hand 
upon his breast said) When the Queen shall die I will 
burn Francis Leake his house and him therein & all 
his family, for the Queen grows to be old and cannot 
long live & in the 5y th year of her age and [sic] 
&3 rd year of her age the Queen shall die for that 
those years were most dangerous and he termed 
those years Annos Climaticos or such like. 

And divers times William Bassett hath spoken 
to the like effect, &c. 

W m Bassett and Randall Swynnerton riding to 
a town Gryndon (being W m Bassett's) Bassett did 
devise a plat of ground whereon he said to Swyn- 
nerton, Here about this toun will I make a skonce 
wherein if my tenants can hold their cattle but 2 or 3 
days within a trensh at the death of the Queen and the 
time of alteration then can I relieve my tenants 
and bring a number of men with me and then 
there will be such a stir as that a thousand pounds 
in money will be worth a thousand pounds Land 
and thou shalt live to see that day come very shortly, 
and to the like effect hath W m Bassett spoken 
divers times and in divers places. 



Randall Swynnerton 



389 



APPENDIX C 

[See page 60 supra} 

TOPCLIFFE'S LETTERS TO THE COUNCIL AND TO 
QUEEN ELIZABETH FROM THE MARSHALSEA PRISON, 
APRIL 1595 

[British Museum. Harleian MSS. No. 6998,7: 184 et sqq.~\ 

MAY it please your LL 8 and the residue, I remaining as I do here in this prison 
of the Marshalsea committed by the Q's Ma tJ ' 8 commandment, by the mouth of 
my Lord Treasurer for all your Honours, Being so her Ma*?' 8 prisoner I did think 
my chief duty to explain my innocency about her Ma tys sacred person by two 
letters & my meaning for any offence that I was guilty of. 

Although by words passed from me in answer to questions asked of me, an 
offence was conceived of my speech for two several grounds of offence given (as 
they were taken) 

1. First, that I should mean that your Lordship the Lord Keeper had not done 
me ordinary justice. 

2. Secondly, that I should mean that I could charge some of your honours with 
taking gifts of 10,000 value To both which 1 must (while I live) protest 
upon the peril of my soul that I neither meant an ill thought or word to the 
Lord Keeper, nor to the person or doings of any of you of that honourable table. 
And as I have in those two letters explained my grief chiefly that her Ma ty hath 
conceived I have done undutifully at this yeare of 63, and never before frowned 
of or called to question, so have I sent to your LL S & Honours hereinclosed a true 
copy of those two letters that I have written to her Ma ty to plead for me to every 
one of you for my mercy, not doubting but if the letters themselves obtain not 
grace at her Majesty's hands for me in as ample sort as my heart desireth in those 
two letters, yet that my service hereafter shall weigh against this offence, and so I 
doubt not but all your HHs will think yourselves Most of whom have 
valued my services past far exceeding that which myself have weighed them at. 

If any thing want in this that your HHs expect for, I beseech your LL S & 
your residue to lay this my humble letter & that which is contained in my said 
two copies of my letters to her Majesty together, and therewith I trust your 
honourable wisdoms and the Lord Keeper particularly will hold himself satisfied. 
Otherwise the length of time & loathsomeness of prison must make satisfaction for 
my answers unto questions (the answers mistaken) which questions drew me to 
make answer as I did pass through the Council chamber, and neither complaining 
myself nor I complained upon by any person nor any matter of state the ground 
of those questions nor of my fault. Then I shall quietly endure seven years 
imprisonment if it be laid upon me, and yet do my best service to God my queen 
and country, if my avowed enemies here suffer me to live, where I am forced upon 
good grounds to become my own cook continually, seeing daily here walk before 
me a murderer of fresh [? French] Byrthe [V], who (as 3 witnesses offered to 
justify) did come out of Ireland from priests to murder me, And yet he is not the 
39 



APPENDIX C 

worst of the papists that daily front me with envious eyes from whose ciooks God 
keep her Sacred Ma ty and you all. 

from the Marshalsea this Monday in Easter week 1595 

the humble prisoner of her Majesty 

Ric. TOPCLIFFE 

A true copy of my first letter sent to the Queens most excellent Majesty and 
also of my second letter, I think both rejected, since I was committed. 

My most gracious and only Sovereign, I have long since heard and lately 
believed that the indignation of a prince to a faithful subject is a kind of death. 
Myself hath lived in 3 or 4 of my KK" and QQ 8 days & have thought any of 
their frowns to be deeper wounds than any of any other degree, prince or subject, 
can cure ; But the same eyes, brows or speech that doth give the blow, I mean the 
delightful cheer of the Same my Sovereign, can only heal and cure. 

Now find I the latter of those to grieve and the lesser over true, at 60 and 3 
years of age, so far as when I was told at your Highness's Council table that your 
Majesty's sacred pleasure was upon unhappy Palm Sunday that I should be com- 
mitted to prison for an offence growing through my own answer to questions asked 
me wherein (as the Almighty judge me) I never meant the matter as it was 
conceived nor meant the man as took the matter as meant to him (the Lord Keeper 
I mean) I did feel then that heavy doom oppress and wound me at the heart at one 
instant with sorrow, disgrace and undoing. So far, as my foes will grow now to 
be hardier to whet their swords, daggers & to provide bullets powder and poison 
to requite their malices against me : which enemies of mine did give out three days 
before I was committed that I was committed, some said to the Fleet, others said 
to the Gatehouse. 

Therefore I wish that when I had unknown poison given to me at Newgate at a 
dinner presently after I had given my sharp evidence against 'Bellamy's wife, then judged, 
then that my tongue had lost power to speak for a year rather than I should have 
given to your princely conceit the least cause of offence, for any evil meaning of 
mine, that might be construed against the meanest councillor of your Majesty, for 
the Almighty God knoweth I have ever honoured your choice & themselves & 
the Lord Keeper particularly, as your Sacred Majesty doth know, to whom I have 
many times desired your Majesty to refer me above others, and his secret conscience 
doth know my true and plain affection to his Lordship. And my own conscience 
condemn me to hell if I meant any evil in these words, videlicet : 

1. If / may have ordinary justice I shall recover ^3000 of Fitzhe rbert. 

I meaning as well when I shall have execution upon my judgment, as also in 
the Common pleas or in the King's Bench, when I shall sue for 40 marks land a 
year which Fitzherbert hath assured me, upon which mistaking of my words, I was 
told that I had spoken dishonestly & that I was a dishonest man, in which place 
it hath pleased your Majesty to say that I have not served your Majesty, but in a 
better degree. 

2. Secondly, offence was taken when I was asked how I could deserve to have 
a bond of a prisoner of ^3000. I answered that I had that bond & the other 
gifts three years before he the same Fitzherbert was a prisoner, and that I had 
deserved it as well as some had done for whose favour 10,000 had been given 

39 1 



APPENDIX C 

and this was construed to be meant, that I said that some Counsellor of them had 
taken 10,000 which of my soul I meant not. But I offered to set down in 
writing by how many I meant it ; And to your Majesty as to my goddess, I will 
explain it whensoever my service to come shall deserve that I may be admitted to 
your most joyful presence, and so most lowlily I cease 
the 15 of April 1595 

your Majesty's prisoner humbly in the Marshalsea 

Ric. TOPCLIFFE 

A true copy of a second letter that I presumed to write & send to her most 
excellent Majesty upon good friday next after, explaining also my fault and 
meaning. 

Every prince's subjects, dear Queen, hath privilege (being wronged) to appeal 
to his supreme sovereign from any inferior party, although an inferior prince. 
Myself do not appeal for my judgment to prison because your honourable table 
said that it was your sacred pleasure which cannot err. 

No more did my heart err, nor my words erred, but his Lordship that wrested 
my well-meaning words to a wrong meaning of my own and construction of words. He 
might be deceaved for he is but a man raised to the state of a god in your earth, in 
regard whereof I will still honour him so much that if your Majesty will say or 
command me that I shall say, I am in fault, because your honours did commit me, 
I will say so. But to the God of heaven and to yourself my Goddess on earth, I must 
say that my words & meaning was innocent & mistaken by his Lordship, then 
were it a sin to condemn & accuse myself. 

In my words their Lordships and I differ not. But in meaning we differ, and there- 
fore there is error in their or in my meaning, for which I wish that there lay a writ of 
execution or trial for my life with mine equal, or that I had lost my left hand, upon 
condition that your Majesty had heard me speak, my words were so clear from 
thought of evil or fault in my heart. 

But when I said at that table, that it was given out abroad two or three days 
before I was committed, and wagers offered to be laid thereof in sundry places of 
note, then a Counsellor told me that it was a prophet that so gave out. But that 
prophet was not my judge, for if he had been or were, he would judge me from 
hence to Tyburn, to which place I have helped more traitors than all the noble 
men and gentlemen about your court, your Counsellors excepted. And now by 
this disgrace I am in fair way and made out to adventure my life every night to 
murderers, for since I was committed wine in Westminster hath been given for 
joy of that news, & in all prisons rejoicings. It is like that the fresh dead bones 
of father Southwell at Tyburn and father Walpole at York, executed both since 
Shrovetide will dance for joy. And now at Easter, instead of a Communion, many 
an Alleluia will be sung of priests "and traitors in prisons and in ladies closets, for 
Topcliffe's soul and in farther kingdoms also. 

My doating friends will lament, with whom I meant to have meat at my house 
in Lincolnshire, myself & some of them to have set a trap for ... my cousin 
with whom I have had a familiar attending & upon his . . . this winter [blanks 
in MS]. My horses being brought up from thence for that purpose yesterday 
above 100 miles to my slaying, which was decreed in prisons before (as hath been 
392 



APPENDIX C 

told me) by these professors, wagers and rejoicings, and if it had not chanced as it 
did, I had been like to have taken a priest upon Palm Sunday at night. 

If my disgrace, yea or my death, may avail this policy of this present time or 
state, I wish then both were ended, myself & all I have, no creatures living but 
Queen Elizabeth nor ever to be altered, as the mighty God knoweth, who preserve 
your Majesty ever. 

At the Marshalsea this good or evil friday 1595 

Only your Majesty's humble prisoner, 

RICHARD TOPCLIFFE 



3 D 393 



APPENDIX D 

[See page 37 supra, and the facsimile'} 

AN EXEMPLIFICATION OF A FINE GRANTED IN THE 
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, TRINITY TERM, 32 ELIZA- 
BETH, 1590 

RICHARD TOPCLIFFE, ESQRE., PLAINTIFF, AND THOMAS 
FITZHERBERT, ESQRE., DEFORCIENT. OF THE MANORS 
OF OVER AND NETHER PADLEY SUPER DARWENT, 
COUNTY DERBY 

TRANSCRIPT 

[The abbreviations have been written out in full] 

Elizabeth dei gratia Anglic ffrancie et hibernie Regina fidei defensor etc. 

Omnibus ad quos presentes littere* . . . finis cum proclamationibus inde 
factis secundum formam statuti in huiusmodi casu nuper edit! et provisi levata fuit 
in curia nostra coram tune * ... Westmonasterium termino Sancte Trinitatis 
anno regni nostri tricesimo secundo Tenor cujus sequitur in hec verba 

Derb. ss. hec est finalis co[ncordia facta in curia] Domine Regine apud West- 
monasterium in Octavis Sancte Trinitatis anno regnorum [sic] Elizabeth dei gratia 
Anglie ffrancie et hibernie Regine fidei defensoris etc. a con[questu tricesimo] 
secundo coram Eduardo Anderson ffrancisco Wyndam Willelmo Poryam et 
Thoma Walmyslcy Justiciariis et aliis domine Regine fidelibus tune ibi presentibus 

Inter Ricardum Topclyffe Armigerum questorem 

Et Thomam ffitzherbert armigerum deforcientem de maneriis de Over padley 
et Nether padley super Darwent cum pertinentiis ac de sex mesuagiis duobus cotagiis 
decem gardinis decem pomariis mille acris terre quingentis acris prati sexcentis 
acris pasture trescentis acris bosci mille acris jampnorum et bruere et viginti solidatis 
redditus cum pertinentiis in Over padley Nether padley Gryndleforde alias Grindel- 
forde et Lyam alias Lyham in parochia de Hathersedge alias Hadersytche Unde 
placitum convencionis summonitum fuit inter eos in eadem curia 

Scilicet quod predictus Thomas recognovit predicta maneria et tenementa cum 
pertinentiis suis esse jus ipsius Ricardi 

Ut ilia que idem Ricardus habet de dono predict! Thome 

Et ilia remisit & quiet'clamavit de se et heredibus suis predicto Ricardo et 
heredibus suis imperpetuum 

Et preterea idem Thomas conc'essit pro se et heredibus suis quod ipse warranta- 
vit predicto Ricardo & heredibus suis predicta maneria & tenementa cum pertinentiis 
suis contra omnes homines imperpetuum 

Et pro hac recognitione remissione quiet'clamatione warranta fine et concordia 
idem Ricardus dedit predicto Thome octingentas marcas argenti 

Tenor proclamationum hujus finis sequitur in hec verba secundum formam statuti 

* A corner of the deed having been cut off at some time, a few words are missing. 

394 






APPENDIX D 

Prima proclamatio facta fuit octavo die Julii termino See Trinitatis anno trice- 
simo secundo Regine infrascripte 

Secunda proclamatio facta fuit vicesimo die Octobris termino ScT Michaelis 
anno tricesimo secundo Regine infrascripte 

Tertia proclamatio facta fuit vicesimo octavo die Januarii Termino ScT Hillarii 
anno tricesimo tercio Regine infrascripte 

Quarta proclamatio facta fuit vicesimo quarto die Aprilis termino pasche anno 
tricesimo tercio Regine infrascripte 

In Cujus rei testimonium sigillum nostrum ad Brevia in Banco predicto sigillan- 
dum deputative presentibus apponi fecimus 

Teste E. Anderson apud villam Sancti Albani Sexto die Novembris anno regni 
nostri tricesimo quinto 

CROMPTON 



ENDORSED BY TOPCLIFFE. AN EXEMPLIFICATION 
OF A FYNE LEVYED FROME THOMAS FITZHARBERT 
ESQUYER, TO MEE, OF THE MANER OF PADLAYE &c. 
IN OCTAVIS SCTI TRINITAT A RREG. ELYZABETH 32 : 

[See facsimile supra, facing page 58] 

TRANSLATION 

Elizabeth by the grace of God Queen of England, France and Ireland, Defender 
of the faith etc. 

To all to whom the present letters shall come . . . 

A fine, with the proclamations made thereof, according to the form of the statute 

lately passed and provided in such cases, was levied in our Court before 

at Westminster in Trinity term in the 32 nd year of our reign, whose purport 
followeth in these words : 

Derby : to wit. This is the final concord made in the Court of the Lady Queen 
at Westminster in the Octave of the Holy Trinity in the 32 nd year of the reign 
of Elizabeth &c, in the presence of Edward Anderson, Francis Wyndham, 
William Poryam and Thomas Walmesley Justices, and other lieges of the Lady 
Queen there present. 

Between Richard Topcliffe Esq re plaintiff and Thomas Fitzherbert Esquire 
deforcient, of the manors of Over and Nether Padley on Derwent with the 
appurtenances, and of six messuages, two cottages, ten gardens, ten orchards, a 
thousand acres of land, five hundred acres of meadow, six hundred acres of pasture, 
three hundred acres of wood, a thousand acres of furze and heath and twenty 
shillings of rent with the appurtenances, in Over Padley, Nether Padley, Grindel 
ford and Lyham in the parish of Hathersage. Therefore a plea of covenant was. 
declared between them in the same court, namely that the said Thomas recognised 
the said manors and tenements with their appurtenances as the right of this Richard 

As being those which the same Richard holds by gift of the said Thomas. 

395 



APPENDIX D 

And these he renounced and quitted claim of for himself and his heirs to the said 
Richard and his heirs for ever. 

And moreover the same Thomas granted for himself and his heirs that he has 
warranted to the said Richard and his heirs the said manors etc. against all men for 
ever. 

And for this recognition, remission, quit claim, warranty, fine and concord, 
the same Richard gave to the said Thomas eight hundred marks of silver. 

The order of the proclamations follows according to the form of the statute. 

The first was made July 8, 1590, the second October 2O th 1590, the third 
January 28, 1590-1, the fourth April 24 th 1591. 

In witness of which, we have caused our seal for Briefs in the said Bench to be 
affixed by deputy to these presents. 

The Judge, Edward Anderson was witness [that the money was paid at the 
court] at the town of St. Albans, on November 6, in the 35 th year of our reign 

[1593]- 

CROMPTON 
(Signed) TOPCLIFFE 



39 6 



APPENDIX E 

[See page 68 supra, and the facsimile] 

QUIETUS GRANTED TO ANTHONY FITZHERBERT FOR 
PENALTIES INCURRED BY HIM FOR HIS RECUSANCY, 
AMOUNTING TO 120 
DATED EASTER TERM, 3 JAC. I., 1606 

[No. 40 of the Norbury deeds at Swynnerton] 

IN ROTULO EXONERATIONUM RECUSAN IN DERB. 

Derb. Anthonius Fitzherbert nuper de Padley in parochia de Hethersedge in 
com. predicto generosus debet cxx. li. videlicit Ix. li. inde virtute cuiusdam actus 
parliament! apud Westm. xxix 110 die Octobr. Anno XXVIII Regine Elizabeth 
inde nuper editi et provisi intitulat 'an act for the more speedy and dewe execucion 
of certen branches of the statute mayd in the XX th yeare of the Queenes Ma ts 
raigne Intituled an act to retayne the Quenes Ma ts subjects in ther due obedience.' 
Eo quod ipse non accessit ecclie parochiali de hethersedge predicte nee alicui ali 
ecclie capelle aut usuali ali loco co'is precat. infra spatium trium mensium proximo 
sequen[tium] XX m diem Decembr. Anno XXX mo eiusdem Regine Et Ix. li 
res[iduas]virtute actus predict! Aquarto die Julii Anno XXXI mo . eiusdem Regine quo 
die convictus fuit usque XXVT" diem Septembris tune proxime sequentis Scilicet pro 
tribus mens. Eo quod ipse non fecit submissionem et devenit confirmabilis [sic] secun- 
dum veram Intentionem Actus parliament; predict!. S[equit]ur Exon[er]at io dc 
cxxli. predictis per consensum Baronum annotat. in memor' 1 ex parte Remem. Thes. 
de Anno Tertio R. nunc Jacobi viz. inter record, de termino pasche Rotlo 
[blank]. 

M:N D 

quietus est 

H. PALMER 

Exoneratio pro Pasc. ter. Record. 
Atertio Rs. Ja : 

Ex parte Rem. Thes. 

He : SPYLLER 



TRANSLATION 

Derbyshire. Anthony Fitzherbert, lately of Padley, in the parish of Hathersage 
in the aforesaid county, gentleman, owes ji2O : namely, j6o in virtue of a certain 
act of parliament at Westminster, October 29, in the 28th year of Queen 
Elizabeth, then lately published and provided, entitled 'An act for the more speedy 
and due execution of the statute made in the 2Oth year of the Queen's Majesty's 
reign, entitled An act to retain the Queen's Majesty's subjects in their due 
obedience ' : inasmuch as he has not attended the parish church of Hathersage 

397 



APPENDIX E 

aforesaid nor any other church, chapel or other usual place of common prayer, 
within the space of three months next following the 2Oth day of December in the 
30th year of the same Queen : and the remaining 60 in virtue of the said act 
from the 4th day of July in the 3151 year of the same Queen, on which day he was 
convicted, unto the 26th day of September then next following, namely for three 
months ; Inasmuch as he did not make submission and became conformable 
according to the true intention of the aforesaid act of parliament Followeth the 
Exoneration (or final discharge) of the aforesaid 120 noted by the consent of the 
Barons in the Memoranda Rolls of the Treasurer's Remembrancer in the third year 
of the present King James, namely among the records of Easter Term in the 
Roll- 
It is discharged 

H. PALMER 

NOTE. It is not clear why Anthony Fitzherbert owed for these periods only, 
or why they were exacted so late. Possibly it was an attempt to make him take 
the Oath of Allegiance. Each of the periods mentioned is one of three lunar 
months i.e. of twelve weeks only. The first includes the time of Anthony's 
arrest (December 20 to March 14, 1587-8; he was arrested February 2 of that 
year), and the other covers three months of his imprisonment in Derby Gaol (from 
July 4, when he was convicted, to September 26, 1589). He did not promise to 
conform till May 1591. I must leave the puzzle to be cleared up by more learned 
searchers. 

It should be noted that this document is an "office copy" of the entry in the 
L.T.R. [i.e. Lord Treasurer's Remembrancer] Memoranda Rolls. 

The Acts referred to will be found in Coke's Statutes at Large, vol. ii. The 
Act of the 28th Elizabeth is mainly concerned with the levying of the arrears 
owed to the Crown by Recusants. 



398 



T \ f\ r f 



INDEX 

ABBOT, Father Thomas, 304, 310, 341 
Aldfield Chapel, 135 
Allen, Cardinal, 59, 66, 157, 184, 185 
Almond, Yen. John, 164 ; relics of, 357, 

378 
Amand, St., Monk O.S.B., 345-346 ; Apostle 

of Flanders, his Feast, 346 
Andleby, Ven. William, relic of, 367, 368 
Anne Family, sufferers for the Faith, 353 
Anne (Amyas), Ven. John, parents, birth- 
place, ordination, martyrdom, 351 
Anstey, Mr., prisoner in the Fleet, 29 
Apreece Family, 327, 328; extinct, arms, 

motto, 331 

Apreece (or Price), Ven. Robert, his father, 
327 ; wife, 329 ; colonel of Loyalist 
troops at Lincoln, 329 ; martyrdom, 

327. 329, 33 1 
Apreece, Robert, recusant, 328 ; monument 

and epitaph, 328-329 
Aprice, James, 329, 330 
Arches Family, 346 
Arches, Ralph de, 346 
Arnold, Richard, priest, 56 
Arras, martyrs ordained at, 188, 240 
Arrowsmith, Ven. Edmund, S.J., biographer, 

187, 196 note ; birth, parents, love of 
Divine office, 187; ordination, 188; 
work in Lancashire, 188, 192 ; in Lan- 
caster Castle, release, 188; last Mass, 

188, 189 ; arrest, 191-195 ; in prison, 
195 ; martyrdom, 197, 201 ; relics, 189, 
190-191, 198, 198 bis, 199 ; miracles, 
199-201 ; legend, 196 

Arrowsmith, Margery, 187 

Arrowsmith, Robert, 187 

Arthington, William, recusant ; wife, 137 

Arundell, Sir John, 33 

Aston, Sir Walter, 27 

Atkins, Judge, 271, 274 

Audley, Martin, 26, 52 and note, 54 

BABTHORPE Family, 136 

Babthorpe, Lady, 137 ; imprisonment, 

heroism of, 145, 146 
Babthorpe, Sir William, zeal and suffering 

for the Faith of, 135, 136 
Baddesley Clinton, Franciscans at, 319-320 
Baddesley Clinton Hall, always in Catholic 

hands, 319 ; Ven. John Sugar at, 322 ; 

poem on, 325 
Badge Court, 269 ; seat of Wintour family, 

275 ; described, 276 
Badger, Mr., kindness to priests, 156 
Baldwin, Fr. William, S J., 89 
Bamber Bridge, 308 



Barkworth, Ven. Mark, O.S.B., 222 ; relic 
of, 356 

Barlow Family, antiquity of, 209 ; always 
Catholic, 210; loyalty to the Stuarts 
of, 245 ; arms of, 246 

Barlow Hall, 209-213, 224, 245 

Barlow, Alexander, rebuilds Barlow Hall, 
211 ; dies in prison, 212-13 

Barlow, Sir Alexander, Kt., recusant, 
heavily fined, 213; children of, 212; 
213-14, 215 ; death of, 213, 224 ; burial- 
place of, 213, 214 and note ; will of, 213 ; 
portrait of, 213-14 

Barlow, Sir Alexander, Kt., 212 ; death and 
burial, 245 

Barlow, Alexander, 245 

Barlow, Ven. Ambrose, O.S.B., his parents, 
212, 215 ; christening of, 214; page to 
Sir Uryan Legh, 220 ; confirming of 
and return to the Faith of, 221 ; college 
career of, 219-223 ; profession of, 213, 
223 ; ordination of, 224, 240 ; work in 
Lancashire of, 219, 224, 236 ; his apos- 
tolic life, 225-236 ; preaching of, 231 ; 
imprisonment four times of, 229 ; arrest 
at Morleys Hall of, 208, 238-9 ; in 
Lancaster Castle, 236, 239 ; apparition 
of Ven. Edmund Arrowsmith, 229, 230 ; 
trial of, 240-241 ; martyrdom, 202, 242 ; 
his " mortuary bill," 243-244 ; skull at 
Wardley Hall, 204, 205, 206, 209, 244 ; 
other relics, 244-245, 369, 372, 378 ; 
biographers, 221, 224 and note 

Barlow, Anthony, 246 

Barlow, Edward, 243 

Barlow, Elizabeth, 220 

Barlow, Ellis, 211 

Barlow, Mary, 212, 215, 219 

Barlow, Maud (nee Fitzherbert), three years 
in Derby Gaol, 69 

Barlow, Sir Robert de, 210 

Barlow, Robert, O.S.B., 215 

Barlow, Thomas, 245-246 ; grandson of, 
246 ; last male heir of family of, 246 

Barlow, William (Dom Rudesind, O.S.B.) 

214, 215, 221-22, 223, 224, 242, 245 

Barnard Castle, 113, 116; siege of, 117 

Bassett, William, 17, 35, 60 

Baynham, Fr. John, S.J., 276, 279 

Baxter, Elizabeth, informer, 286 

Beaulieu, 81 

Bedingfield, Sir Henry (of Oxburgh), por- 
trait and monument, 329 

Bedingfield, Marie, 329 

Bedingfield, Thomas, petition to Charles II., 
329-330 ; portrait, 330 note 

399 



INDEX 



Bedloe, 272, 284, 339 

Bell, Yen. Francis, O.F.M., 147-48, 37 & 5 

relics of, 359, 371 and note, 372, 374 
Bellamy, Anne, 60 note 
Bellamy, Katherine, 33 
Bellfield, Elizabeth, 212 
Bennet, Protestant Bishop, hunts down 

Catholics, 334-36 
Berington Family, 334 
Bickerdyke, Yen. Robert, recusant and 

martyr, 147 
Birmingham, first Catholie church built, 

264 ; burnt, 267 
Bishop Thornton, 134 
Blainscough Hall, B. Edmund Campion at, 

306 

Blount Family, 334 
Blount, Sir Michael, Lieutenant of the 

Tower, 58 

Boar's Head Inn, Hoghton, 195 
Bodenham Family, 334 
Boleyn, Alice, 95 
Boleyn, Anne, her ghost, 81, 86 
Bologna, 67 
Bolton-le-Sands, missionary altar, 188, 304, 

310,311 

Borgia, St. Francis, hat of, 378 
Bosham Church, 75 
Bothe, Alice, 14, 15 bis 
Bothe, Roger, 15 
Bowes, Sir George, 112 ; report to Lord 

Sussex, 112, 113, 114, 116, 117, 118, 120 
Bradshaigh, Sir Roger, 186 
Bradshaw, Dom Augustine, O.S.B., 67 
Bramley, , conversion, 351 
Brancepeth Castle, 112, 113, 114 
Brancepeth Church, 112 
Brauxholm, 121 

Brereton, Margaret, 216 ; her story, 217-218 
Brereton, Sir Thomas, 220 
Brereton, Sir Uryan, 212, 216, 218 bis 
Brereton, Sir William, 219-220 
Briant, B. Alexander, S.J., 100, 378 
Bridewell, 89 
Brimham Family, 134 

Brindle (Lanes), 183, 188, 192; old malt- 
house, hiding-place in, 197 
Brinkley, Stephen, 99 ; prints Rationcs 

Decem, 100 ; arrested, 100, 102 
Brockholes (Lanes), missionary altar at, 

310 

Brockholes, Mary, 248 
Brockholes, Thomas, 248 
Brompton (Yorks), 285 
Bromsgrove Parish Church, 253, 276 
Bromwich, Fr. Andrew, 302 
Broughton Castle, 50, 53 
Browne, Edward, informer, 38 
Bryan, Fr., priest of Pickering, 300 
400 



Bulkeley, Lady Katherine, O.S.B., last 

Abbess of Godstow, burial-place, 219 
Burgess Family, 188, 304, 308 bis 
Burghwallis Hall, 351-354 
Burgoyne, Mr., 323 bis 
Buxton, Yen. Christopher, 45 
Byrnand Family, 137 
Byrnand, Grace, 137 

CADWALLADER, Yen. Roger, martyr, 336 ; 

relic of, 381 note 
Campion, B. Edmund, martyr, 34, 69, 71, 

89, 90, 91, 92, 94 ; Rationes Decem, 

loo-ioi ; arrested, 102; 184, 186, 328 ; 

supposed ring of, 375 ; relics of, 377, 

378 bis 

Cardiff, martyrs at, 284 
Catesby, Sir William, 49 
Catharine of Aragon, 78 
Catherick, Yen. Edmund, relics of, 370, 372, 

37? 

Catherine of Braganza, 264 
Catholic Emancipation (1829), 2 77 
Catholic Relief Act (1791), 276, 279 
Catmore, Berks, 343 
Cavarel, Abbot, 223 
Cavers, 121 

Cayley, Sir William, 285 
Cella Nuova, Benedictine Abbey, 222, 223 
Chaddesley Corbet, inn, 253 ; church ; 253, 

254, 265 

Chaigley Hall, 247, 248 
Chaloner, Sir Thomas, 25 
Chapel House, Chaigley, 247, 248 
Charles I., King, at Oxford, 179 ; 188,