Skip to main content

Full text of "The Friendship Indispensable"

See other formats


C45 



9I4.2L 



Keep Your Card In Tills Pocket 

Books will be issued only on presentation 
of proper library cards. 

Unless labeled otherwise, books may be 
retained * for four weeks. Borrowers finding 
books marked, defaced or mutilated* are ex 
pected to report same at library desk; other-* 
wise the last borrower will be held responsible 
for all imperfections discovered. 

The card holder is responsible for all books 
drawn on his card, 

Penalty for over-due books 2c a day plus 
cost of notices, 

Lost cards and change of residence must 
be reported promptly. 

PUBLIC LIBRARY 

Kansas City, Mi). 
Keep Yaur Card in This Pocket 




THE FRIENDSHIP 
INDISPENSABLE 



THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 

NEW YORK BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS 
ATLANTA SAN FRANCISCO 

MACMILLAN & CO., LIMITED 

LONDON BOMBAY CALCUTTA 
MELBOURNE 

THE MACMILLAN CO. OP CANADA, LTD. 

TORONTO 



T HE: KR I JEM P g H I P 

I N E> J:PEN S'ABIL E 



BY 

CHARLES EDWARD JEFFERSON 

AUTHOR OF "THE BUILDING OF THE CHURCH," ETC. 



got* 
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 

1923 

All rights reserved 



COPYRIGHT, 1923, 
BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 

Set up and printed. Published April, 1923. 



* J J 
Press of 

J. J. Little & Ives Co'mpany 
New York, XT. S. A. 



6 f92| 



CONTENTS 

CHAPTER PAGE 

I. THE NEED OF INTERPRETATION .... i 

II. BRITAIN FOUR YEARS AFTER THE WAR . . 9 

III. THINGS BEAUTIFUL IN BRITAIN . . , . 17 

IV. BRITAIN'S ATTITUDE TOWARD Us, .... 24 
V. THE CITY TEMPLE 32 

VI. RELIGIOUS LIFE IN BRITAIN 39 

VII. POLITICAL LIFE IN BRITAIN 46 

VIII. MR. DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 53 

IX. ANGLO-AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP .... 60 

X, FOES OF INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP . . 67 

XL PROHIBITION AND THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS 74 

XII. THE MISSION OF THE CHURCH .... 82 



THE FRIENDSHIP 
INDISPENSABLE 



THE 
FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

CHAPTER I 
THE NEED OF INTERPRETATION 

Do two English-speaking nations' need to be in 
terpreted to one another? They do, even if they 
exist side by side on the same continent. Much 
greater is the need if a mighty ocean rolls between 
them. There are times when distance does not lend 
enchantment to the view. When one nation looks 
at another nation through the mists of three thou 
sand miles of sea, it sometimes sees specters, and 
other things uncanny. British ignorance of the 
United States has been recently commented on by 
Sir Auckland Geddes and other British public men, 
and the ignorance of Britain which prevails in the 
United States is also colossal and much to ^ be 
lamented. Britain does not understand America, 
nor does America understand Britain. I use Amer 
ica as a synonym of the United States. When citi 
zens of the United States call themselves Americans, 
it is not because they assume^ that they are the only 
people on the American continent. They call them 
selves Americans to differentiate themselves from 
the Canadians on the north and the Mexicans on 
the south. We seem to be driven to this form of 



2 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

speech in order to escape the uncouth expression 
"United" Statesians:" That would be intolerable, 
and so, not prompted by bumptiousness but driven 
by necessity, much of the world has come to speak 
of the United States in ordinary conversation as 
"America," and of the citizens of that country as 
"Americans." In that popular sense I use the word 
"America" in these articles. First of all let us deal 
with British ignorance of America. 

Britons on the whole are ignorant of America 
because most of them have never seen America. 
Britons do a lot of sight-seeing in their own little 
island. Many of them go now and then to the 
continent, but only a few ever cross the Atlantic, 
and of these few only a fraction visit the United 
States. It is one of the surprises to an American 
traveling in England to find intelligent people there 
who have been several times in Canada but never in 
the United States. The greatest of the world's 
republics did not excite their curiosity sufficiently to 
induce them to cross the border. 

The fact is that the average Englishman is not 
greatly interested in our country. This is true of 
all classes. Educated Englishmen do not follow 
our political and social and religious movements 
with the same interest with which educated Ameri 
cans follow theirs. An Englishman of culture is far 
more likely to be ignorant of current events in 
America than a cultivated American of current 
events in Great Britain. I once asked an English 
man to account for this. He admitted that it is a 
fact, and his explanation was that England is an old 
country, and America is comparatively a new coun 
try, and that it is natural for the new countries to 
look to the old. The children follow with keener 
curiosity the conduct of the mother than the mother 



THE NEED OF INTERPRETATION 3 

follows the actions of the children. Many English 
men in high circles do not think there is anything 
worth seeing in the United States. Now no one can 
understand a country he has never seen. Every 
traveler knows that nothing can take the place of 
the eye in making the acquaintance of a people. 
Books do not carry one far. The imagination is 
one of the most unreliable of all our faculties. The 
most diligent student is always amazed on arriving 
on a foreign shore to find everything so different 
from what he had anticipated. ^Much of the igno 
rance on both sides of the Atlantic is due to the fact 
that the masses of both countries have never left 
their own shores. 

A second cause of misunderstanding is the daily 
press. The daily press does not intentionally mis 
represent one country to another. An occasional 
journalist, devoid of conscience and driven on by the 
fury of a jingoistic heart, may deliberately carica 
ture and render odious by misrepresentation one 
nation to another, but the mischief done by the^daily 
press is not the product of malice but the inevitable 
outcome of the conditions and limitations within 
which the press must do its work. The American 
press gives scant space to British news for the 
reason that America is a vast world in itself, and 
supplies more good copy every day than can pos 
sibly be used. The British press gives even less 
space to American news, and there is a reason. 
London is the metropolis of the world and the 
center of it, and enough important things occur in 
that one city every twenty-four hours to keep the 
printing presses working overtime. There are 
other great British cities and these cannot be over 
looked. And beyond England there are British 
colonies and dependencies every one of which has 



4 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

a claim on the attention of a Briton who wishes to 
play an intelligent part in the life of his generation. 
In the British press American news is sometimes 
only Canadian news. It is not uncommon to find 
United States news condensed into a paragraph. A 
man comes to grade the importance of nations by 
the amount of space they fill in his daily paper. 
How can the masses of people come to know a 
nation which is habitually shoved into an obscure 
corner of their public prints? This is said not in 
way of condemnation, but for purposes of explana 
tion. 

The bulk of American news appearing in British 
papers may be divided into two classes. First is 
the financial news, the quotations of the stock mar 
ket, the operations in Wall Street. American news 
is often the story of big deals. The almighty dollar 
and America are constantly linked together in Brit 
ish papers. No wonder that it is current opinion 
that Americans care only for money and that this 
country is the Paradise of promoters and explorers, 
a land of speculators and frenzied financiers. Tbe 
dollar mark is thrust every day into the British eye. 
Of course space is left for a recital of the unsavory 
and the horrible. It is a newspaper tradition that 
only what is exceptional is really news. The press 
cannot afford to print the ordinary, the habitual, the 
normal. It is frightful accidents, and appalling mis 
fortunes, and atrocious crimes, and freakiness raised 
to a lofty pitch which the cable loves. But these 
are not the things which reveal the character of a 
people. Character comes out in the ordinary rou 
tine of the common days, in the habitual conduct of 
the plain people. The newspaper must be made 
interesting, and to be interesting it must deal with 
the spectacular and the abnormal. Thus the 



THE NEED OF INTERPRETATION 5 

America which a Briton sees is a caricature. No 
such America really exists. The papers repeat facts, 
but isolated facts cannot tell the truth. Life is 
made up of the ordinary. Character is revealed 
by the habitual. A nation's soul is expressed not in 
the antics of eccentric individuals, but in the com 
monplace ongoings of the prosaic days. The daily 
press is constantly leading the world astray by its 
inability to report all the facts. 

False impressions are created in other ways. 
The tourist frequently misrepresents his country in 
foreign lands. Americans sweep over the British 
isles every summer like a tidal wave. It is a good 
thing for Americans to visit Britain good for 
Americans and good for Britons too but it is un 
fortunate that not a few American tourists fail to 
represent their country worthily. Multitudes of 
our best people never go abroad. Some of our least 
worthy people go every summer. It is natural that 
rich people should travel, but only rich Americans 
travel with from ten to fourteen trunks apiece. The 
newly rich always occupy a prominent place in the 
tourist procession and it is a matter of regret that 
the newly rich do not always possess good manners. 
Every well behaved American who has traveled 
abroad has frequently blushed for shame because of 
the conduct of some of his ill behaved fellow trav 
elers. Travel has a tendency to bring out what is 
worst in a person. People often do when abroad 
what they will not do at home. Persons genteel 
and gracious aijiong friends sometimes become over 
bearing and boorish among strangers. Even sen 
sible people often become crotchety, and unbearable 
when subjected for a long time to the irritations 
and vexations of travel. The misconduct of Ameri 
can tourists is a topic of conversation in many lands. 



6 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

All over Britain one hears stories of the oddities or 
grumblings or boastings of some American who has 
passed that way. The boisterous laughter, the 
reckless squandering of money, the rushing into 
places where entrance is forbidden, the destruction 
of property in a wild scramble for souvenirs these 
are sins not confined exclusively to Americans, but 
Americans are often guilty of them, and as Ameri 
cans travel in battalions, their approach is often 
anticipated with dread. There are Britons who 
because of unfortunate experiences have come to 
think of America as a nation of braggarts and van 
dals and boors. When one thinks of what Britain 
has suffered within the present generation from this 
annual invasion of American tourists, one wonders 
that international relations are as good as they are. 
There are American travelers let us rejoice to say 
who by their speech and conduct lift America to 
higher levels in British esteem, but it is a question 
whether American prestige has not on the whole 
suffered because of the rudeness and ostentation 
and bumptiousness of a certain class of Americans 
who every summer rush from city to city u doing 
England/' 

Another reason why Britons do not understand 
us is because we are so big, and so mixed. Indeed 
it is hard to understand ourselves. What American 
does not stand bewildered in the presence of devel 
opments in his own nation's life! England is a 
little country, Scotland is yet smaller and Wales is 
smaller still. You can put all three of them and 
Ireland too inside of any one of several of our com 
monwealths. When Miss Maude Royden visited 
us last spring, she attended a conference, some of 
whose delegates had traveled two days and a half 
to be present, and yet the place of meeting was cen- 



THE NEED OF INTERPRETATION 7 

tral. The British woman went home wondering if 
any country has a right to be so big. It is because 
of pur enormous size that we cannot do many things 
which are easily done in Britain. Our population is 
conglomerate. ^ The British people are homogene 
ous. London is solidly English, only four per cent 
of her population is foreign born. Compare Lon 
don with New York. When you are in London you 
know where you are. Who can tell when in New 
York where he is? It is this mixture of races and 
nations under our flag which complicates all our 
problems and makes it well-nigh impossible for a 
Briton to understand us. Newspapers have a way 
of talking which creates endless confusion. They 
say, "America thinks" "America is indignant." 
"America has changed her mind." "The American 
heart has cooled." "America is no longer our 
friend," all of which is newspaper lingo, with no 
meaning whatever. America is too complex to be 
characterized in a sentence. Feeling and thought 
in a hundred million people are too diverse to be 
defined by a reporter. America is a huge mass of 
human beings drawn from the four quarters of the 
globe, scattered over more than three million square 
miles of territory, and a foreign journalist who tells 
his readers what America thinks or feels is likely to 
shed darkness rather than light. A little group in 
America may by its gesticulations and loud bawling 
give the outside world the impression that what it 
says is the sentiment of the whole American nation. 
Frenzied Irishmen, for instance, in mass meetings in 
a few Eastern cities have hissed Britain with such 
venom and heated vociferousness that many Britons 
have come to feel that the American Irishman is the 
accredited spokesman of the American republic. It 
is assumed in many circles that when he speaks the 



8 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

real soul of America finds expression. Britons are 
often misled. 

These are a few of the reasons why interpreta 
tion is indispensable. We Americans misunderstand 
Britain because we too are ignorant. We also need 
the assistance of an interpreter. Men of good will 
have a work to do. They alone can remove the 
misunderstandings and mischievous impressions and 
foster the feelings which will create a friendship 
which cannot be broken. 



CHAPTER II 

BRITAIN FOUR YEARS AFTER THE WAR 

Outwardly she seems unscratched. I was in Lon 
don in 1912, and the London of 1922 seemed no 
different. It was the same big, old town. The buses 
had not changed, nor the crowds, nor Fleet Street,, 
nor Trafalgar Square, nor the Thames. I was dis 
appointed. I had expected changes. I supposed I 
should see an increased number of maimed and crip 
pled men in the streets. They were not there. 
Britain had two million men wounded in the war, 
and many of them were permanently wounded, but 
one does not see them in the city streets. I saw no 
more one-armed and one-legged men in London 
than I had seen there ten years before. 

London is not scarred by the war. The bomb 
dropping aeroplanes did their utmost, but it was not 
much. The destruction of physical property was 
slight. There is an inconspicuous plate here and 
there marking the spot where a bomb fell, but a 
visitor would not see these plates if they were not 
pointed out to him. Germany's damage to London 
was a mere pin scratch, and a pin scratch becomes 
invisible in less than four years. Nor are there any 
scars on physical England anywhere. There are no 
ruins in any part of the island to which a tourist is 
conducted, no devastated fields, no blasted forests. 
The landscape which one sees from the railway 
train smiles as of old. England is still as beautiful 
as the Garden of Eden. 



io THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

Nor could I see any change in the people, either 
in their looks or their conduct. Seven hundred 
thousand Britons died in the war, but a visitor does 
not detect their absence. London is still the largest 
city on the planet, and Glasgow and Birmingham, 
Edinburgh, and Manchester are still expanding. I 
paid particular attention to the dress and the faces 
of the people, everywhere they seemed well dressed 
and well nourished. There was no sign of poverty 
anywhere, except in those quarters where poverty is 
perennial. Even in Jarrow, where thousands of 
men out of work filled the streets, the children 
looked robust and happy, and no suffering met the 
eye. In no part of the country did there seem to 
be scarcity of money. Railroad rates were high, 
but everybody seemed to be traveling. Crowded 
trains were common. The trains out of London at 
the end of the week were jammed. Outwardly 
England is prosperous and happy. The play 
grounds were all filled with players. The theaters 
were packed to the doors. The music halls were 
overflowing. The Derby never drew larger crowds. 
Ascot was never more thronged or more magnifi 
cent. The shop windows of the cities were full of 
everything which the heart can crave or money can 
buy, and buyers were abundant. 

I was in London in the "Season," and what a 
season it was ! The papers agreed that for the first 
time since the war, life had mounted to its pre-war 
volume and sparkle. English society was extraor 
dinarily brilliant in the "Season" of 1922. I had 
read in American papers of the poverty in Britain, 
but there was no evidence of it which came under 
my eye. I was at Ascot on the last day of the races 
when royalty was there, and a great company of the 
lords and ladies of the land, and the display of 



BRITAIN FOUR YEARS AFTER THE WAR n 

fashion was indescribably gorgeous and dazzling. 
No one was able to compute the total cost of the 
hats and garments and jewels worn that day. On 
the day preceding the day of my visit to Ascot it 
had rained and some of the papers estimated that 
$500,000 worth of dresses and hats had been 
ruined. There were enough others unspoiled to 
make the day of my visit outflash any day I had 
ever seen. When one gazed on that vast exhibition 
of costly raiment, that phenomenal display of milli 
nery glory, it was difficult to believe that the bloodi 
est and costliest of all wars had ended less than 
four years before. I was in Oxford on the last 
day of the boat races there. The Isis was covered 
with boats filled with the beauty and strength of 
England. It seemed as though all the prettiest 
girls of the British Empire had assembled that day 
in Oxford, and that the handsomest young men of 
Britain were there to greet them. On the faces of 
that joyous crowd, war did not cast a shadow. 
Many men had perished in the awful struggle, but 
multitudes are still alive, strong and eager to carry 
forward the old Oxford traditions. Many women 
had been crushed by the weight of sorrow rolled 
upon them by the war, but Britain has today thou 
sands of lovely girls, strong in body and radiant in 
spirit, who will become the mothers of men as fine 
and strong as those who perished in the war. 

It is amazing how quickly the ravages of war are 
covered up. Nature does not like a scar. With in 
imitable artistry she conceals it . On even the worst 
shell-swept battlefields of France, I saw poppies 
blooming. Along the trenches, grew rows of col 
ored blossoms, and at the bottom of many a shell 
hole I saw a flower. Nature tries to forget the 
insane things which her children do. She blots out 



12 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

as rapidly as possible the products of their folly. 
In a few short years physical Europe will show 
scarcely a trace of the havoc and devastation 
wrought by the most furious of all the human tem 
pests which have ever swept across the earth. 

Human nature is equally industrious in covering 
over .the wounds which war has made. The human 
heart is so buoyant that no tragedy can quench the 
fire which burns in it. The human spirit is so tough- 
fibered that no tribulation can break it. No matter 
how appalling the catastrophe, laughter never dies 
out of the mouth, and the heart never permanently 
loses its song. In spite of the great war there is 
still a "Merry England." 

I loved to watch the English children play. It is 
through the children that God assists the world to 
get rid of its torturing memories, and by their 
smiles and laughter he wipes the tears from the 
world's eyes. All children under three are just as 
happy today as though the war had never been. 
No child of five knows the fear and agony of war. 
Here then is a fountain of life undarkened by the 
shadows of bereavement. Upon the heart of a 
little child no shadow ever falls. The children of 
Britain up to eight years of age have never carried 
the burden which their parents carried, and because 
their hearts are fresh they will be strong to do effec 
tive work in the building of the world which is to 
be. Their hearts have not been bruised or broken 
by the hurricane which shook the world, and it 4s 
their sunny minds and leaping spirits which will be 
potent in shaping the policy of the coming years. 

But there is an interior life of a nation, and the 
interior life of Britain has been variously altered. 
Four years can wipe the tears from the eyes, but 
four years cannot wipe the tears from the heart 



BRITAIN FOUR YEARS AFTER THE WAR 13 

Britain's heart is full of tears. There are no audible 
sobs, but in silence Britain is weeping. Underneath 
all the gaiety and mirth which float on the surface, 
there is an immeasurable grief in the soul of the 
British people. The tourist can pass swiftly from 
city to city visiting art galleries, and enjoying cathe 
drals, and remain unconscious of what the people 
are thinking and feeling. Outside the hedge the sun 
is shining inside the hedge the shadows are deep 
and long. It was my privilege to have access to 
many British homes. In every home I found myself 
in the presence of a grave. It was a son or a 
brother, or a father, or a neighbor's boy, a nephew 
or a grandson or a daughter's husband. Always 
was there a vacant chair, in that home, or in some 
other home connected with it. If I did not hear the 
story of death, it was a tragic tale of ruined health, 
a shattered constitution, the upsetting of life's plans, 
the fading of dreams, the blasting of glowing hopes. 
Britain four years after the war is still bleeding. 

I noted quite early a difference in the English 
papers. They give more space now to crime than 
they did ten years ago. I presume this is because 
there is more crime to report. More prominence is 
given to divorce trials than before the war, and the 
reason is that the war increased the number of mar 
ried couples who wish no longer to live together. 
Britain like our own country is suffering from a 
crime wave and a divorce wave. War is the arch 
demoralizer of society. War is the deadliest enemy 
of mankind. War always upsets, mars, destroys. 
War brings down the ethical standards. War de 
moralizes the moral values. War pulls down and 
tramples all the virtues. Britain was stabbed by the 
jvar and she is bleeding. 

Britain has a colossal national debt. Her taxa- 



14 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

tion is appalling. Her debt aggregates over forty 
billion dollars. The average Britain pays one-third 
of his income in taxes. On a little Ford car he pays 
ninety dollars a year. When an automobile in 
Britain goes up even a slight hill it always goes on 
second speed because its horse power is low. The 
horse power is kept low in order to escape a tax bill 
too heavy to pay. London surprises the American 
visitor by the number of horses to be seen in her 
streets. There are many motor buses, but the pri 
vate automobiles are comparatively few. When 
one hears what a Briton is charged a gallon for 
gasoline and what he pays in taxes on his car, one 
wonders that a Briton is willing to own an -automo 
bile at all. New York is a city of automobiles so 
also is Paris. London is a city of horses. Britain 
in order to pay her debt is willing to subject herself 
to a taxation which no other people would endure. 

Outwardly Britain looks prosperous and money 
seems abundant, but when one gets under the sur 
face he finds embarrassments, and economies, and 
oftentimes privations, which are painful and in 
some cases heart breaking. Thousands of Britons 
cannot live as they lived before the war. They say 
nothing. They suffer in silence. Many Britons are 
out of work. In some cities the number reached 
into the tens of thousands. One day I observed 
near my hotel a great crowd of men extending 
almost a block. I supposed it was a temporary con 
gestion, and paid no attention to them. At the end 
of an hour I passed that way, again, they were still 
there. At the end of three hours they were there 
still. My curiosity was aroused, and on investiga 
tion I found that these men were all looking for a 
job. It had been made public that morning that a 
humble workman in a hotel had the day before 



BRITAIN FOUR YEARS AFTER THE WAR 15 

given up his position, and the announcement of this 
fact was sufficient to draw together this immense 
host of applicants eager to fill his place. One was 
chosen, ninety-nine went home disappointed. 

The problem of unemployment is only one of a 
dozen or more puzzling questions with which the 
British people have to grapple. The Irish problem 
is not yet^ settled, nor is the Egyptian problem, nor 
is the Indian problem, nor is the Palestine .problem, 
nor is the problem of dealing with the Turk. World 
politics so frenzied and tangled that the wisest 
man cannot tell what a day may bring forth. I was 
impressed by the humility of the men I had the 
privilege of meeting. None of them claimed either 
special knowledge or wisdom. They all were ready 
to say, "I do not know," or "It is hard to say," or, 
"Nobody can tell." To most inquiries in regard to 
what the outcome was likely to be, the answer was : 
"I don't know." We are all walking like men in a 
mist. The fog which has settled down upon the 
common people has wrapped itself around the heads 
of the high and the great. '-The world has become 
so complicated, and the threads of its life have 
become so tangled, that its problems run beyond the 
powers of the human mind. There are thunder 
clouds all around the horizon, and who dare predict 
what is going to happen? All nations are like ships 
tossed on an angry sea, and the war has engulfed 
the whole world in a dense fog. Some nations are 
in terror, suffering from shell shock. Others are 
bewildered and semi-paralyzed. Still others are at 
the point of delirium. The war was a world shat 
tering catastrophe. It was a cosmic tragedy. The 
convulsion reached down to the roots of our civ 
ilization. Humanity is desperately sick. It has a 
high fever, a rapid pulse, and is on the verge of ner- 



16 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

vous collapse. It will not recover in a generation, 
For a hundred years mankind will limp because of 
the great war. But of all the peoples of the old 
world who had a prominent part in this bloody 
drama, the British have best kept their head. The 
British temper has most successfully stood the test. 
The British character has won new luster in the 
world-darkness. 



CHAPTER III 
THINGS BEAUTIFUL IN BRITAIN 

I do not write of her physical charms. I am not 
thinking now of her lawns and her trees, her birds 
and her flowers, her art galleries and her cathedrals. 
These have been written about thousands of times. 
The world is filled with pictures of them. I con 
fine myself to some spiritual lovelinesses of Britain. 

The apostle Paul has urged us to meditate upon 
the things which are lovely and of good report. If 
there be any virtue or any praise we are to think 
about them, if there be any form of strength, or 
any form of beauty, we are to let our mind rest 
upon them. It is a misfortune that we often think 
of the worst happening in foreign lands. If there 
be any weakness or anything deserving of condem 
nation the cable sends it on. All the worst things 
of America are known and talked about in Britain. 
The British people know all about our divorces, 
our murders, our lynchings and our rascalities. It 
is a sad story which British papers receive from 
America to lay before their readers. What a pity 
the cable cannot be trained to carry in both direc 
tions news of things which are lovely and of good 
report I 

A visitor in England cannot fail to be impressed 
by the courtesy of public officials. When I showed 
my passport to the officer on board the steamer 
before landing, I told him I was going to preach 
three months in Britain. His affable reply was: 

17 



i8 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

"Report at once to the Chief of Police when you 
reach London." It was said in a tone so gentle and 
friendly that I felt sure it was a proper thing for 
me to do. The London policeman is a model of 
politeness. He has been praised many times, and 
I want to praise him again. He is pestered half to 
death all day long by American tourists who are 
always wanting him to tell them which bus to take, 
or in what direction to go, or how far off a certain 
place is, and he never loses his patience, and while 
not omniscient his knowledge is immense. I was 
surprised to learn the London policeman does not 
carry a revolver. There are twenty-five thousand 
policemen in Greater London, and not one of them 
is armed. When Sir Henry Wilson was murdered 
on the steps of his home, the murderers were at 
once confronted by policemen. The murderers held 
pistols and the policemen had none, but those un 
armed policemen compelled the murderers to retreat 
down the street. The murderers fired at them 
again and again. Three policemen were wounded 
before the murderers were disarmed. It is a thrill 
ing fact that the greatest city on the earth is held 
in order by a body of men who carry nothing in 
their hands. 

The English have a beautiful fondness for things 
which are old. Yesterday is held^ in reverence. 
The past is considered sacred, and is carried for 
ward into the new generation. It is fascinating to 
an American to read the names of the streets dis 
played on the London buses. They are so quaint 
and so funny. Many of them sound as though they 
might have been invented by Charles Dickens, 
Others go back to the age of Elizabeth, while still 
others seem to run back to the beginning of the 
world. 



THINGS BEAUTIFUL IN BRITAIN 19 

The British are always celebrating birthdays of 
great men and women. Every member of the, 
Royal Family has a birthday every year, and not 
one of these can be neglected. The illustrious dead 
are not allowed to slip out of the mind. One morn 
ing I awoke to find the city celebrating Queen Vic 
toria's birthday. I do not think they celebrate the 
birthday of George III. Britain has a long line of 
departed generals and admirals, statesmen and 
poets, and these must all be remembered every year. 
The nation stands face to face continuously with its 
mighty dead. Blessed are the people who reverence 
the great and the good of the generations that are 
gone. Britain is immovable because of her tight 
grip on the past. 

An American in London is impressed by the gen 
tleness of the people, especially when they are 
massed together in crowds. A London crowd is the 
gentlest of all crowds. I saw several immense ones, 
but I never heard any loud talking or explosive 
laughter, and I never saw any shoving or pushing. 
There were no rowdies or boors, just a mass of 
people quiet and well bred. 

The British believe in work and they also believe 
in play. They do a lot of work. They do their 
work easily and without fuss. They open their 
stores at nine and close them early. The men 
demand opportunity to play, and so also do the 
women. Playgrounds are everywhere, and they are 
always full. The children play and the youth play, 
and the men play even up to old age. In our coun 
try tennis is considered too swift a game for men 
over forty, but in England men in the seventies still 
play tennis. Earl Balfour is seventy-four, but at a 
garden party last June he delighted a large com 
pany by playing a set of tennis with Mr. Bonar Law. 



20 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

All classes and ages play. No matter how busy a 
man is he still plays. Mr. Lloyd George has borne 
heavier burdens during the last eight years than 
any other man on the planet. His physical stamina 
is amazing. Every one who sees him is struck by 
his freshness and Uuoyancy. He never is too busy 
to play. In the greatest crisis he takes time to play 
golf. ^ 

Britons also take time to drink tea about four 
o'clock. They do this every day. They do it all 
over England. It is a national institution. An 
American soon comes to believe in it and to like it. 
It breaks the monotony of the working day. It 
throws around life an air of leisureliness. It re 
minds one that we are here not simply to work but 
to live. It gives friends an opportunity of meeting. 
Social life is quickened and nourished. Huma^i 
hearts are brought closer together. Over the tea 
cups political and church questions can be amicably 
discussed. Viewpoints can be compared and minds 
can be clarified. Britons do not gulp down their 
tea in a hurry. They sip it leisurely. They drink 
two cups and sometimes more. They tarry after 
the last drop has disappeared. There is no more 
hard work that day. One wonders what effect on 
the British character would be wrought by the 
elimination of the afternoon teapot. I found on 
the continent one day an Englishman who was in 
the worst of humors. On investigation I discov 
ered he was out of sorts because he was being 
deprived of his afternoon tea. One reason why 
England is so rich in expert conversationists is no 
doubt the opportunity given for social intercourse 
over the teacups. 

The devotion of Britons to their royal family 
must be put down in the list of things lovely. 



THINGS BEAUTIFUL IN BRITAIN 21 

George V is popular with his people. He is not 
brilliant but he is sensible. He is not a genius, but 
he is a reliable high-minded man. The Queen 
shares her husband's popularity. The papers fondly 
record day by day her every movement, and never 
fail to tell what kind of a dress she had on, and 
what style of a hat she wore. Princess Mary is a 
great favorite. When her wedding presents were 
displayed they attracted vast crowds of men and 
women of all classes. Waitresses and shop girls 
and domestic servants and scrub women were found 
daily in the line. They felt that Princess Mary 
belonged to them, and they took a genuine pride in 
her marriage and in her presents. London is in 
some ways only a big village, and has not thrown off 
entirely rural ways. When a girl in a small town 
marries, all the neighbors take an intense interest in 
her husband, in her trousseau, and in her presents. 
For several weeks she is the uppermost topic in con 
versation. They are fond of her because she is 
one of themselves. So it was in the big town of 
London when Princess Mary was married. The 
neighbors through six weeks kept coming in to see 
the beautiful things she had received. 

But the most popular member of the royal 
family is the Prince of Wales. His popularity 
almost reaches the point of adoration. The enthu 
siasm is universal. Undoubtedly he is today the 
most popular young man in the world. When Mr. 
Lloyd George said the other day in his speech at 
the Guild Hall in London that "while there may be 
differences between parties and differences in parties, 
upon one thing there is no division and no difference 
of opinion, and that is our admiration, our attach 
ment, and our affection for the Prince of Wales," 
his words were received with a storm of applause. 



22 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

Everybody in England seems not only to admire 
him, but to be fond of him. I found the people in 
Scotland as enthusiastic as the people in England. 
"He always does the right thing, he always speaks 
the right word," so exclaimed a jubilant Scotchman 
to me one Sunday in St. Giles' Cathedral. Eulogy 
higher than this it would be impossible to pro 
nounce. That seems to be the deliberate judgment 
of the British people on the Prince of Wales. They 
have watched over him since he was a baby. They 
have followed him through all the stages of his 
education. When he went last spring to the Far 
East they followed him with their thoughts, and 
when he returned the whole nation gave a great 
glad shout of welcome. The London papers in 
long editorials dwelt upon his tour as though it 
were one of the great events of modern history, 
and poured praises upon him such as have been 
bestowed upon few mortals. The Prince brought 
home with him a large collection of birds and mon 
keys and snakes presented to him by various rulers 
in India and Ceylon, and for these specimens a 
special place was made in the Zoological Garden in 
Regent's Park. A rush was made at once to see 
them, and for weeks great crowds gazed with de 
light on these possessions of the Prince. His tour 
to the Far East was noteworthy because it was a 
part of his preparation to perform some day the 
duties of the ruler of the British Empire. Britons 
follow him with loving solicitude because he belongs 
to them and will some day be their king. Kingship 
after the British fashion has many admirable 
features, and serves various desirable ends. The 
King is not a despot. His authority is narrowly 
limited. Britain is a genuine democracy. The Peo 
ple rule. They rule through the House of Com- 



THINGS BEAUTIFUL IN BRITAIN 23 

mons, and the head of the government is the Prime 
Minister. The Government can be overthrown any 
day by vote of the House of Commons. An appeal 
must then be made to the voters who must decide 
whether the present policies shall be continued. All 
this takes place entirely independently of the King. 
The King sits in a realm above partisan politics. 
He is the symbol of national unity. He is the head 
of the British people. He is the personification of 
the dignity and might of the empire. To him the 
hearts of the people turn. In him they find unity 
and strength. At the end of every play in every 
theater the orchestra plays a line of "God save our 
gracious King." Before smoking is allowed at any 
public banquet or dinner, the guests drink the health 
of the King. Often the whole company rises and 
sings. There is nothing which Britons sing with 
such gusto and glow as this : 

God save our gracious King 
Long live our noble King 
God save our King. 
Send him victorious 
Happy and glorious 
Long to reign over us 
God save the King. 



CHAPTER IV 

BRITAIN'S ATTITUDE TOWARD US 

An American living in Britain for several months 
and mingling freely with the better classes, comes 
to feel that the British people on the whole are 
kindly disposed toward us. Their feelings are 
friendly. They are our friends not only today, but 
they want to be our friends tomorrow and the day 
after. It is not possible to speak for every individ 
ual of an entire nation. There are individuals in 
every country who do not reflect the common senti 
ment. There are groups in every land whose spirit 
is not that of the people as a whole. Just as there 
are groups of persons in America who are always 
suspicious of Britain and readily express their dis 
like, so also in Britain there are groups who have no 
fondness for America and who regard us some 
times with scorn and sometimes with mingled pity 
and horror. But the British are a remarkably homo 
geneous people. There is a public opinion there 
which is calculable beyond public opinion in the 
United States. It is easier to say what is the Brit 
ish attitude to any question or country, than to say 
what is the attitude of the United States. Britain 
is a small country and her population is not drawn 
as ours is from a dozen different nations. It is the 
conviction of all the Britons with whom I talked 
that the British people is our steadfast friend, and 
that judgment was confirmed in my own mind by 
my varied experiences and observations. 

24 



BRITAIN'S ATTITUDE TOWARD US 25 

^^any Britons ^ have their doubts as to the 
friendliness of America toward them. They feel 
that we are indifferent, if not positively hostile. 
They can marshal quite a mass of evidence to sup 
port this feeling, and the surmise that we do not 
like them gives them not a little concern. They are 
perplexed by many phenomena which they find it 
hard to interpret. We are always doing something 
or saying something which increases their bewilder 
ment. The course of our present government is 
something of an enigma. Our aloofness is hard for 
them to excuse. They feel that we by our action 
have made the European situation more bafflng and 
dangerous. They have not entirely forgotten the 
service we rendered in the war, but I could not help 
feeling that the edge of their gratitude has been con 
siderably dulled. There are individuals in whose 
hearts the sense of appreciation is still keen, but the 
average Briton is not dwelling so much now on 
what we did to win the war as on the amount of 
money we made out of the war. He hotly resents 
the assertion of sundry American papers that 
Britain has added immensely to her land possessions 
by the war. He claims that Britain wanted to gain 
no territory whatever by the war, that Britain had 
already more land than she wanted, and that what 
ever lands have come o her as the result of the 
war, are dnly additional burdens. The jtiew colo 
nies in Africa are worthless, and Palestine brings 
only embarrassing responsibilities and possible 
dangers. The new land was thrust on her, and a 
Briton feels that any jibe of ^the sort comes with bad 
grace from the country which refused to take any 
mandate whatever, washing her hands of all respon 
sibility, and leaving a helpless people like the Ar 
menians to the mercy of a government which has 



26 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

the instincts of the wolf. But if an American thinks 
of the new acres now under the Union Jack a 
Briton is apt to think of the new gold now in Ameri 
can pockets. Our newspaper talk about our twenty- 
two thousand war millionaires has been repeated 
all over Britain. There is not a family in which it 
has not been the subject of prolonged conversation. 
The fact that we have four times as much gold as 
Britain has, and more than all the nations on the 
continent of Europe combined, is not conducive to 
quietness of mind in Britain. The whole world is 
today deeply conscious of the fact that America is 
the only Christian nation which made money out of 
the war. I was told so in every country in which I 
traveled. I found it in the most unexpected quar-' 
ters. I heard it from the lips of men whom I never 
suspected of giving thought to international^ finance. 
On the Corner Grat I found an Alpine guide who 
reminded me that America had made a^ fine thing 
out of the war. His business was to guide men to 
the top of the Matterhorn. While engaged in this 
hazardous occupation he seemed to have leisure to 
meditate on the wealth which America had amassed 
in the war. The flood of American tourists which 
deluged Europe this last summer only deepened^in 
the mind of millions the conviction that America 
Jby the war had put money into her purse. Did not 
these Americans fill all the cabins^ de luxe on ^every 
expensive steamer, did they not seize ^all the highest 
priced rooms in all the most expensive hotels, did 
they not crowd into the uppermost seats at the most 
extravagant of all the feasts, did they not buy up 
all the diamonds in sight, and where did this money 
come from if not from the war? We have flashed 
our gold in the eyes of the world, and it has not 
added to our popularity. A London preacher after 



BRITAIN'S ATTITUDE TOWARD US 27 

spending two months in the United States went 
home to tell his people this : 

"Perhaps the^very first impression that comes 
to one on arriving in America is the impression 
of her wealth. I used to plead with the Ameri 
can people to see to it that they do not lose the 
love of other peoples. They do not deserve to 
lose the good will of other races, and yet it is a 
fact that to a great extent America's prosperity 
rests upon the war. Men do not hesitate to say 
they say it frequently in conversation that 
those years of the world's war were years when 
money was easy to make in America. A smitten 
world turned to her for stores and munitions of 
war: let it be said for her that when she came 
into the arena there was no stint concerning 
money, but it must be remembered that her 
material gain, so far as coin is material gain, was 
due very largely to the world's distress. It is no 
wonder then if the great Republic of the West 
lies for the time being under the shadow of the 
resentment of many people." 

This is all the more significant because it comes 
from a man of unusual fairness of judgment and 
friendliness of heart. It reveals what lies deep in 
the British mind. Britain thinks often of the gold 
we accumulated in the war. That is one reason she 
is sensitive over her indebtedness to us, and resents 
our pushing her in regard to payments. She bor 
rowed from us in order that she might loan to 
others who had no other friend to whom to turn. 
She has a debt of over forty billion dollars. Her 
taxation is heavier than that in any other land. 
She expects to pay her debts. She has no desire to 



28 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

squirm out of them. I never talked with a^ Briton 
who was not emphatic and firm^on that point. ^ It 
is not the fashion of Britain to shirk financial obliga 
tions. But Britain wants time. She will pay, but 
it is not easy for her to pay just now. The burden 
upon her people is already as heavy as men ought to 
be called on to bear. Some day she will pay the last 
cent, but our Government seems inclined^to throw 
obstacles in the way. We are making it difficult for 
her to pay. She cannot easily pay in gold, and there 
are only two other ways in which she can pay. She 
can pay in services or in goods. She can carry our 
exports and imports in her ships. But by pur ship 
ping bill we are going to deprive her of this oppor 
tunity. She can pay us in goods, but by our tariff 
bill we are making it difficult if not impossible for 
her to sell us her goods. To Britons it looks as if 
we had no mercy. We are out for money, and 
money we are going to get no matter who is crowded 
to the wall. This ruthless policy relentlessly pur 
sued does not strike the average Briton as the 
policy of a friend. 

Moreover, our attitude toward the League of Na 
tions is an embarrassment and a disappointment. 
President Wilson went to Paris representing 'the 
American people. Under pressure from him, 
France waived her claim to a clear cut Rhine fron 
tier, conditionally upon America and Britain guar 
anteeing France by pact against future German ag 
gression. So the peace treaty was drafted. Then 
the United States repudiated her accredited^ agent. 
She refused to live up to the agreement arrived at 
in Paris, To a Briton this looked like a breach of 
faith. Nothing like that can happen in British for 
eign policy. The nation abides by the acts of her 



BRITAIN'S ATTITUDE TOWARD US 29 

representatives. When we refused to sign the 
treaty or to enter the League of Nations Britain 
was left in the lurch. She could not alone guarantee 
France against ' German aggression. She was 
obliged to withdraw. This left France in the lurch. 
Without guarantees she had to fall back upon her 
own army. It had to be kept large. This exposed 
her to the charge of militarism. It also imposed on 
her an enormous budget. This was the beginning 
of the estrangement between Britain and France. 
They have been pushed farther and farther apart. 
If Britons knew our constitution better than they 
do, and if they understood that the Senate has a 
constitutional right to cooperate with the President 
in the shaping of our foreign policy, they would 
probably look upon us with a more lenient eye. But 
on the surface, it looks as if a President of the 
United States was only a puppet at a world council 
in a critical day, and that our country jauntily tossed 
into the wastebasket an agreement which had been 
solemnly made in our name. And so while we did 
heroic service in war, we have been a mischief-maker 
in peace. Europe so Britons think is more em 
broiled today than it would have been had Mr. 
Wilson never crossed the Atlantic. 

Our persistent aloofness is also a cause of pain 
ful wonder. We are rich and strong, but we do not 
lend a hand. We are the mightiest of the mighty, 
but we refuse to get under the world's burden. We 
send only observers, onlookers, spectators. We do 
not send men to engage in hard work. We want 
civilization to be preserved, but we leave to other 
nations the task of preserving it. We want cruelty 
suppressed and humanity advanced, but we refuse to 
get under the load. We want the problems of the 



30 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

world settled equitably, but we decline to take a 
place at the council table of the nations. To a 
Briton our conduct is selfish and indefensible. 

But in spite of all these provocations the temper 
of Britain is remarkably sweet. Many of her lead 
ers have been in our country. They know the vast- 
ness of it, and also the diversity of our population. 
They understand that we cannot do at once what we 
are certain to do later. They are patient. They 
are willing to wait. They have confidence in the 
judgment and ideals of our best people. They feel 
sure that at heart we are sound. They therefore 
refrain from hasty words. They refuse to pass 
bitter judgment. They know from their own experi 
ence that in a democracy noble causes often lag, and 
that bright ideals are sometimes for a season 
obscured. 

It is not to be wondered at that Britain is some 
what puzzled. Many Americans are puzzled them 
selves. They cannot understand why our govern 
ment does not state clearly what sort of interna 
tional body this nation would be willing to enter/ 
It is evident that the present League of Nations has 
features which render it obnoxious to many of our 
wisest men. It is well nigh certain that we shall 
never enter the League in its present form, nor does 
the world expect us to do so. It is our privilege to 
stay out of any organization whose nature would in 
our judgment retard us in our development, or han 
dicap us in rendering our highest service to man 
kind. But since we cannot go into, the League as 
constituted at present, it is for us to say what modi 
fications should be made, or on what conditions we 
should be able to come in. To pursue a policy of 
isolation, to sit in a box seat as a spectator, to con 
tent ourselves with looking on while other nations 



BRITAIN'S ATTITUDE TOWARD US 31 

are bearing the burden in the heat of the day is to 
multitudes the whole world over not a praiseworthy 
attitude for the greatest of the world's republics, 
not a role which a mighty Christian nation should 
be content to play. But Britain believes in us. She 
expects to see us at last by her side. 



CHAPTER V 
THE CITY TEMPLE 

The three London churches best known to Amer 
icans are probably St. Paul's Cathedral, the Metro 
politan Temple, and the City Temple. The first is 
Anglican, the second Baptist, and the third is Con 
gregational. The first became popular to our gen 
eration through the preaching of Canon Liddon, 
the second through the preaching of Charles H. 
Spurgeon, and the third through the preaching of 
Joseph Parker. The City Temple is an old church, 
having been organized in 1640 by Rev. Thomas 
Goodwin who became its first pastor. Goodwin 
was one of the outstanding theologians and preach 
ers of his day, a writer of many books, a chaplain of 
Oliver Cromwell and one of his chief advisers. It 
was Goodwin who ministered to the Lord Protector 
upon his deathbed. But the man who made the City 
Temple best known to Americans was Dr. Joseph 
Parker, who, after a pastorate of thirty-three 
years, died in 1902. Joseph 1 Parker was a genius, 
and like many another genius, he had his oddities 
and limitations. Although the pastor of a Congre 
gational church and working under a policy which 
places supreme authority in the members of the 
church, he did not like church meetings. They bored 
him and he had no use for them. He considered 
deacons a needless infliction on a church and he would 
have none of them. One of my surprises was to find 

32 



THE CITY TEMPLE 33 

a Congregational church without a deacon. He did 
not deem a church treasurer essential to the prog 
ress of the kingdom of God, and so at the close of 
each Sunday all the money obtained in the collection 
was ^ handed over to him, and in return he gave a 
receipt. Indeed he was not greatly interested in the 
church as an organized body at all. To him the 
church is simply the Christian people, the men and 
women in whom the spiritual work of Christ is 
going forward. He despised all priestly or sacer 
dotal claims. He brushed aside all written creeds. 
He would subscribe to none himself, nor would he 
ask others to subscribe. He made no effort to build 
up a large membership. He was indifferent to the 
number of church accessions. Stories are afloat 
some of them perhaps apocryphal of how persons 
had to struggle to get into the church at all, in some 
cases being obliged to wait for more than a year 
before they could gain admittance. And so when 
the fame of the City Temple was filling the earth, 
and men far away were thinking of it as one of the 
largest churches in the world, it was in fact one of 
the smallest of churches, being surpassed in size by 
many Churches in country towns. Under Dr. Parker 
the City Temple was practically a preaching station. 
Men ^and women from the ends of the earth gath 
ered in the City Temple every Lord's Day to hear 
an incomparable interpreter of the Scriptures un 
fold the ideas of the Prophets and Apostles and 
Jesus Christ. Americans in large numbers were 
always found in his congregation. Many Americans 
felt their visit to London incomplete if they did not 
hear Parker. Many of us liked him because he 
liked Beecher. One section of his church the 
upper pews in the back gallery he called the Rocky 
Mountains. Although he has been dead twenty 



34 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

years he is still a power in the church. Everything 
connected with him is held sacred. The big pulpit 
Bible he used through his pastorate is preserved in 
a glass case on a marble table under the pulpit. The 
eye hole in the door of his vestry through which he 
used to look on Sunday before the service to see how 
large his congregation was going to be is pointed 
out to the visitor with awe. Even the bathtub in 
which it was his custom to take a cold bath immedi 
ately before going into the pulpit is preserved, and 
shown to elect strangers with reverent affection. 
Dr. Parker preached not only twice on Sunday but 
he gave a Bible lecture every Thursday noon 
throughout his entire pastorate. This Thursday 
noon lectureship became one of the outstanding 
institutions of London. It is claimed that no other 
man in the entire history of the Christian church 
ever carried forward through so long a term of 
years a course of Bible expositions. Parker's Peo 
ple's Bible is known around the world. 

Dr. Parker 'was succeeded by another genius, Dr. 
Reginald J. Campbell, a man with the face of a 
medieval mystic, and a mind that kept wandering 
into new fields of theological speculation and expres 
sion. He soon became known as the teacher of a 
New Theology. The suspicion once born that the 
Pastor of the City Temple was not altogether 
orthodox, a large congregation was immediately 
assured. There is nothing which so helps a city 
minister to get a hearing as the rumor that he is a 
heretic. He at once secures an immense amount of 
free advertising, and there is enough curiosity in a 
city of several millions to drive multitudes long 
distances to hear a man who is alleged to have 
departed from the faith. Dr. Campbell did not 
possess the physical stamina of his robust prede- 



THE CITY TEMPLE 35 

cessor, and a few short years wore him out. Next 
came an American, Dr. Joseph Fort Newton, the 
pastor of a church in Iowa, a man of whom most 
people in the East had never heard. Not physically 
strong enough to preach twice on Sunday, Dr. New 
ton took the morning service only, while the evening 
service was given to a woman, Miss Maude Royden. 
The combination was unique and attracted no little 
attention both in Britain and in America. The grip 
on the American mind which the City Temple had 
gained under Dr. Parker was not lessened during 
the pastorate of Dr. Campbell, and it was con 
tinued through the pastorate of the man of our 
own household, Dr. Newton. All through the war 
the American pastor of the Temple shone as the 
anointed interpreter of the two great English-speak 
ing peoples to one another, and he maintained amid 
many difficulties the reputation of the City Temple 
as a throne of power. At the end of the war Dr. 
Newton came home and his place was filled by an 
Australian, Dr. F. W. Norwood. The City Temple 
seems destined to do always the unexpected and un 
conventional thing. It startled the world by reach 
ing over into the State of Iowa and calling a Uni- 
versalist pastor to stand in the pulpit of the great 
orthodox Parker, and it gave the world another 
jolt when it called to its pulpit an unknown Baptist 
from Australia. Dr. Norwood had lived to the 
middle forties in Australia as a plain, ordinary, 
fairly successful pastor, and when the war broke 
out he came with the Australian troops to the front. 
Almost at once he was found to possess exceptional 
ability for talking to men. The soldiers liked him. 
They could listen to him an hour and then want 
more. There were evidently powers in this man 
which had hitherto been undeveloped. There was 



36 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

an eloquence in his tongue of which the world had 
not dreamed. Invited one Sunday while in London 
to preach at the City Temple, he made such a deep 
impression that not long afterward he was called 
to be its pastor. From the first day to the present 
he has been growing. He has now taken his place 
among the great preachers of London. The City 
Temple has today the congregations which Dr. 
Parker had at the noon of his power. Dr. Nor 
wood has the physical strength of a Samson. In 
this he is much more like Dr. Parker than either of 
his two predecessors. His mind is keen and alert. 
His heart is tender and big. His sympathies are 
fervent and broad. He has a voice of unusual com 
pass and sweetness. His personality is winsome. 
Upon this man every god has set his seal to give 
the world assurance of a pulpit prince. 

It was in exchange with Dr. Norwood that I went 
to London. Never before had I preached under 
the British flag. Twice had I been in England, but 
on both occasions only as a visitor. This time I 
went as an ambassador of good will, the official 
representative of the Protestant churches of Amer 
ica. I preached morning and evening on seven 
Sundays in May and June. I preached the same 
sermons I had preached in my own church. I did 
not amend them or adapt them to the British mind. 
I found the London congregation much like my con 
gregation in New York. I felt at home from the 
beginning. We understood each other. Having 
lived for years in the published works of Dr. 
Parker, I felt almost like a son of the City Temple. 
I found the worship rich and reverential. I found 
the music of a high order. The chorus choir of 
sixty voices is one of the best in London. The con 
gregational singing is full, and deep and moving. 



THE CITY TEMPLE 37 

The attention of the congregation is eager and in 
spiring. The spirit of the people is cordial and 
enthusiastic. One would travel far to find a congre 
gation surpassing in any way that of the City Tem 
ple. In one point the City Temple congregations 
differ widely from those in the average New York 
church. In the Temple the evening congregation is 
much larger than that of the morning. This is 
true of most of the London churches, and also of 
the churches in many other cities. The hour of the 
evening service is earlier than with us, being never 
later than seven. On the lovely afternoons of May 
and June the beauty of earth and sky seemed to 
reach its climax about seven o'clock, and even at 
half past eight it was still day, light and beautiful 
as ever. Between six and eight is an ideal time on a 
day in spring to take a walk in the park, or to read 
a book, or to chat with a. group of friends, and on 
my first Sunday evening in London I felt on my way 
to church that I was sure to preach to empty pews. 
I could not imagine human beings turning their 
backs on the loveliness of God's out-of-doors. But, 
to my amazement, when I entered the pulpit I found 
myself face to face with two thousand people. Every 
pew was full. It was a miracle. This miracle was 
repeated every Sunday evening. I could not get 
used to it. Every week I was overwhelmed by sur 
prise. I still think of it with wonder. Among the 
thrilling memories of my life there will always 
remain the memory of those wonderful Sunday eve 
nings in the City Temple. 

The church is admirably located. It is easily 
accessible from every direction. The bus system of 
London is perfect, so is the underground. For 
twenty miles in every direction from the front door 
of the City Temple there extends a vast English- 



3 8 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

speaking population from which a preacher can 
draw a congregation. The foreign-born population 
of London is negligible. London is English from 
the circumference to the core. And London is 
Protestant. There are Catholics there of course, 
but it is a Protestant city. What an opportunity 
for a preacher! What an open door for a man who 
has a message! What a chance for a prophet a 
man of vision and power ! 



CHAPTER VI 

RELIGIOUS LIFE IN BRITAIN 

It is like our own mixed. It is good and bad, 
discouraging and also encouraging. It is one thing 
in one place, and a different thing in another place. 
It is always changing. It looks one thing to one 
man, and another thing to another man. It is not 
easy to describe any sort of life at the present time. 
Things are in a great jumble. Wherever I went my 
question was, "What is the outlook?" The answers 
were diverse. u Are things growing better or 
worse?" and the replies did not agree. Even two 
keen-eyed theologians in Edinburgh to whom I pro 
pounded the question gave me different answers. 
The fact is, every man looks out of his own eyes and 
reports only what he sees. Some men are appalled 
by the darkness, and others are encouraged by a 
few faint streaks of light. I have just been read 
ing a sermon by a British Baptist Doctor of Divinity 
and he says, "I wonder if we were ever so short of 
principle or anything that could pass for principle 
since William IV died. The old paganisms are 
rising from their graves. The Witch of Endor is 
not very far away." A London Congregationalist 
Doctor of Divinity has just published a sermon on 
"The Crumbling Foundations of Morality." In 
London there is a preacher who sees the somber 
side of British life so continuously that he has be 
come known as the "gloomy Dean." ^ He is not the 
only gloomy religious leader in Britain. 

39 



40 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

But while there are many things to depress, I 
am sure that the consensus of feeling in Britain is 
that things are not as bad as they were. The tide 
has turned. The darkest hour has been passed. 
The Church is slowly recovering from the demoral 
ization caused by the war. Signs of spiritual awak 
ening are seen in various quarters. I did not find 
any of the leaders jubilant, but I found most of them 
courageous and expectant. There is an optimistic 
note in their preaching and an unquenchable song 
in their heart. They are well equipped for their 
work, and they possess the temper and mettle of 
heroes. Britain is still deeply and strongly 
Christian. 

Like us they have serious problems with which to 
grapple. The number of men preparing for the 
ministry is too small. Too many of the churches are 
without pastors. Too many churches have ^small 
congregations. The number of conversions is de- 
pressingly small. The financial problem with them, 
as with us, is never far away. But Britons are not 
prone to whimper or surrender. They have patience 
and they know how to endure. The same ^ tide of 
worldliness is flowing over Britain which is over 
flowing the whole world. There is a crime wave 
there as here. There are too many murders and 
too many divorces, and the papers are filled with 
stories of vice and wrongdoing. The good old 
English habit of going to church has disintegrated 
in many places. I was told often that Englishmen 
no longer feel it their duty to go to church. They 
only go when they want to go. They go when they 
feel it worth while to go. They go only when the 
preacher is able to give them something which is 
rewarding. I heard of half filled churches in vari 
ous parts of the land. 



RELIGIOUS LIFE IN BRITAIN 41 

It is in Britain as with us that some churches 
are prosperous, while others have fallen on evil 
days. There, as in the United States, much de 
pends on the ability and devotion of the leader, and 
much also upon the environment. There are places 
where no one can do any mighty works because of 
the lack of responsive, hearts. It was my lot to 
have personal contact only with large and flourish 
ing churches, and therefore my estimate of current 
church life in Britain may be somewhat too rosy. 
There are no more popular churches in London than 
the City Temple and Westminster Chapel, there is 
no church in Bournemouth equal to Richmond Hill. 
There is no church in Birmingham greater than 
Carr's Lane, nor does Manchester possess two 
religious centers surpassing Union Chapel and 
Albert Hall. In Scotland also I had personal 
knowledge of only the best. St. Giles* Cathedral in 
Edinburgh, and the Cathedral in Glasgow, the 
Elgin Place Church in Glasgow, and Free St. 
George's in Edinburgh where in all Scotland can 
churches be found outranking these? In those ten 
churches it was my privilege to preach, and as all of 
them were filled, and some of them were crowded, 
I carried home the conviction that the British are 
great churchgoers. 

So far as I could observe, England seems to be 
singularly free just now from fanaticisms and de 
lusions. I heard of no groups of people who were 
bent on making mischief by pushing those who dif 
fered from them out of the church. Premillenari- 
anism, if it exists, is quiet. No body of zealots 
calling themselves Fundamentalists claim to have a 
monopoly of the faith once delivered to the saints. 
The doctrine of evolution seems to be taken for 
granted, and the assured results of the Higher Criti- 



42 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

cism are well-nigh universally accepted. There is a 
Congregational preacher in London who has won 
notoriety by celebrating mass in his church, and 
dressing like a priest, but he makes no impression 
on the body of the faithful, and his erratic behavior 
is smiled at as a fad which may any day be cast 
aside. 

All branches of the Church are increasingly alive 
to the social question, and British Non-conformist 
ministers venture farther into politics than is con 
sidered good form in this country. There is a larger 
use of out-of-door preaching there than here, and 
clergymen of the highest rank do not count it be 
neath their dignity to speak in a park. One Satur 
day afternoon I heard the Archbishop of York 
speak in the rain to a crowd in Hyde Park. The 
Congregationalists have probably more able preach 
ers than any other Christian communion. There 
are no greater preachers in London than Dr. J. H. 
Jowett, Dr. Robert F. Horton, Dr. F. W. Nor 
wood, Dr. J. Morgan Gibbon and Dr. Thomas 
Yates. English Congregationalism has pushed the 
work of organization a point beyond the point 
arrived at by the Congregationalists in this country. 
They have districted England into eleven provinces,, 
and each province has over it a Moderator. These 
Moderators meet once a month in London to dis 
cuss the common needs and consider whatever meas 
ures may be necessary to meet them. I found the 
Quakers holding a place of greater influence and 
prominence in England than their brethren hold in 
this country. 

The Anglican church is awake to the call of the 
new day. It is fortunate in the men who hold the 
highest places. The Archbishop of Canterbury is a 
man of wisdom and character, and has a catholicity 



RELIGIOUS LIFE IN BRITAIN 43 

of spirit and an openness of mind which win all 
hearts. The Archbishop of York is not a whit be 
hind the Archbishop of Canterbury in all those fine 
traits ^ and high gifts which one likes to find in an 
archbishop, and is exerting an influence which is 
steadily expanding. The Bishop of London is one 
of the most affable of men, a man with a big broth 
erly heart, unwearied in good works, and dearly 
loved by Christians of the whole Church of God, 
Dr. Inge^Dean of St. Paul's is the most influential 
preacher in the Anglican church, and is one of the 
outstanding figures of the metropolis. While I was 
in England he was contributing a series of articles 
to the leading London evening daily in which he 
discussed racily the more prominent topics of our 
day. Dr. Jowett has been doing the same sort of 
work in another London daily. English preachers 
are determined to get at the people. They will meet 
them in the church, they will seek them in the parks, 
they will go after them in the columns of a news 
paper. They will make themselves all things to all 
men in the hope that they may save some. 

The Anglican church has many problems, some 
of them peculiar to itself. It is a divided church, 
and only the high statesmanship of the Archbishop 
of Canterbury has been able to hold the two wings 
thus far together. There are Anglicans who dis 
parage the Reformation and who would like to 
bring the Anglican church to the ways and beliefs 
of the Roman Catholic church except the supremacy 
of the Pope. There are other Anglicans who are 
one with Protestants, and to whom sacerdotalism is 
a perversion of the Christian religion. Both schools 
are alert and energetic, and there seems small likeli 
hood of their ever being brought together. The 
Anglican church has now what is called a National 



44 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

Assembly. The proceedings of the Assembly were 
extensively reported last spring in the London 
papers, and the deepest impression made ^upon an 
outsider was the bewildering variety of views and 
beliefs held today by communicants of the Anglican 
church. From the extreme radicals to the ultra 
conservatives there are all imaginable grades and 
shades of opinion in regard to every subject which 
came up for discussion. Some of the reports 
sounded like a report of the proceedings at the 
Tower of Babel. 

But all this variety of conviction is an evidence 
of life. The Anglican church is very much alive. 
If it was once asleep it has now awakened. If it 
was once belated it is now forging ahead. A^new 
spirit has fallen on it. It has taken a bold attitude 
to economic and social questions. It has taken a 
changed attitude to Non-conformists. This attitude 
was revealed in the Lambeth Proposals on church 
union. There was a fraternal and conciliatory spirit 
in those proposals which marked the dawn of a new 
day. The- ancient wall of partition is crumbling. 
The old-time prejudices and bigotries are slowly 
melting. The interchange of pulpits is progressing. 
Now and then it creates irritation and evokes a 
strident protest, but having started it will go slowly 
forward. There is a better feeling in Non-conform 
ist circles toward the Established church than I 
found in my former visits. I heard nothing but kind 
words from Free churchmen for their Anglican 
brethren. In many communities rectors of Anglican 
churches and pastors of Free churches are working 
together in social enterprises with the utmost cor 
diality. The Lambeth Proposals have not been ac 
cepted by any Free church body, nor are they likely 
to be. But they are being pondered. The discus- 



RELIGIOUS LIFE IN BRITAIN 45 

sion is under way. There is a new spirit in the dis 
cussion, and what the outcome will be does not yet 
appear. Organic union will not come in our genera 
tion. When it comes, if ever, it will not come on 
the basis of the Nicene Creed, nor is it likely to 
come by way of the historic episcopate. But while 
organic union is yet far away, a more fraternal feel 
ing is already here, and comity is here, and friendly 
discussion is here, and out of this closer fellowship 
is going to come a further increase of Christian feel 
ing and new forms of cooperative effort and fresh 
victories for the Church of Christ. British Chris 
tians are going to work together through the next 
hundred years with higher mutual esteem and 
greater efficiency than at any time since the Refor 
mation. Without organic union there will come a 
more intimate fellowship and a wider scope of con 
certed action. Without a consolidation of ecclesi 
astical machinery, there will come such a union of 
hearts that men will forget the peculiarities of their 
regiments in their zeal to storm the strongholds of 
the enemy, and to establish throughout the world 
the kingdom of love. Of two things I am equally 
certain: The Non-conformists of England have the 
spirit of Christ and are doing the work of the 
Apostles. The Anglicans also have the spirit of 
Christ, and they likewise by their sacrifices and 
labors are in the Apostolic Succession. At heart 
they are one. 



CHAPTER VII 
POLITICAL LIFE IN BRITAIN 

An American living in England soon realizes that 
in crossing the ocean he has not left democracy 
behind. There is a democracy on both sides of the 
Atlantic. The United States is not the only coun 
try which enjoys a government of the people, for 
the people, and by the people. Americans are not 
the only human beings who love freedom, and who 
insist on having it. There is wide and genuine free 
dom under the Union Jack. A few Englishmen, 
came to this country in the seventeenth century in 
search of liberty, but the majority of Englishmen 
stayed behind to fight for it on English soil. They 
won the fight. In the eighteenth century we Ameri 
cans fought for liberty, and in doing this we had 
the sympathy and applause of the most English 
section of the English people. The love of liberty 
has always burned like a furnace deep in the English 
heart. The English-speaking peoples have fought 
their way to liberty in every part of the earth. It is 
a boon which cannot be denied them. Britain enjoys 
freedom of thought, freedom of speech, and the free 
dom of the press to a degree not surpassed by any 
other nation. Because Britain is called a monarchy, 
let us not suppose that Britain is not a democracy. 
Because she has a king, one is not to imagine that 
he is a despot or that the supreme political power 
does not lie in the hands of the people. The real 

46 



POLITICAL LIFE IN BRITAIN 47 

ruler of Britain is the House of Commons, and the 
House of Commons rules through the Prime Min 
ister. The Prime Minister, more than any other 
British official corresponds to our President. The 
British King is not a monarch in the medieval sense. 
He is a presiding officer. He presides at the British 
town meeting. The people decide what shall be 
done and what shall not be done. 

At some points British political life is not unlike 
our own. There is a note of pessimism running 
through it. There is a common wail over the lack 
of statesmen. The great men are all dead. There 
were giants yesterday there are none today. The 
men on the political stage are all mediocre. I 
had often heard that the United States Senate is 
filled with pigmies but I was surprised to learn that 
that is the case with the British House of Lords. I 
had been told many times that our House of Repre 
sentatives has in it only third-rate men, but I was 
amazed to hear that that is the caliber of the men 
now in the House of Commons. 

Britons and Americans are alike also in their 
incapacity to be fair when once the political fever 
is on them. Britons boast of their love of fair play 
and they really try to be fair, but, like Americans, 
they do not always succeed. When they fall to 
mauling one another they lose their heads and their 
tongues say things which are foolish. When I 
listened to the stupid and absurd assertions and to 
the petty and malicious charges and when I read the 
wild rumors and crazy conjectures and twisted judg 
ments which were printed, I felt quite at home. We 
do it in the same fashion in the United States. The 
microbe of partisanship is a queer bug. It works 
havoc with the normal operations of the brain and 
the heart. In political life, one can never expect 



48 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

consistency nor can one be surprised at any combina 
tions or outcomes. Political life is always a puzzle 
and an astonishment to a man in his own country: 
the political caldron of a foreign country is even 
more incomprehensible and baffling. 

Political discussion is more general there and 
also more intense than it is with us. This is due to 
the fact that Britain is compact and homogeneous. 
London is the capital and it is also the metropolis. 
It is the seat of Parliament and the abode of power 
from it streams of influence flow to all parts of 
the land. Everything done and said in Parliament 
is printed in full, and the record is laid before the 
whole British people within twenty-four hours. This 
gives all classes an opportunity of discussing 
promptly every statement made and every step 
taken by the Government and also by the Opposi 
tion. There is a public opinion in Britain in a sense 
in which public opinion can hardly be said to exist 
in this country. There is no city in the United 
States which is the center and crown of our Repub 
lic. The British political pot boils furiously because 
there is only one pot, and all the fagots can be 
brought together under that pot. We have several 
pots and they hang over different fires. We have a 
North and a South, an East and a West, but there 
is no North or South, East or West in England. 
Our public opinion is broken up into sectional opin 
ions. In the United States we have vast alien 
groups of citizens, each group holding its own pe 
culiar notions, and it is not possible for any one idea 
or feeling to sway all these groups at once. Months,, 
and perhaps years, must elapse before any sort of 
leaven can leaven the whole lump. After the East 
has made up its mind we must wait to hear from the 
South, and after we have news from the South we 



POLITICAL LIFE IN BRITAIN 49 

must wait for the West to arrive at its conclusions. 
One can never say, " America thinks and feels so 
and so," with the swiftness and certainty with which 
such a statement can be made of Britain. We have 
no center. Our metropolis is in one place, our cap 
ital is in another. There are a dozen sectional 
metropolises, each one the center of political opin 
ion and propaganda. We have no mighty unifying 
force. Groups of men, no matter how brainy and 
powerful, are not able to work the miracles here 
which can be wrought by groups of men in London. 
When an American finds himself in the midst of a 
people all of whom speak the same language, and 
who are so close together they can exchange mes 
sages in the same day, and who have common so 
cial ^ and religious traditions, he finds political dis 
cussions taking on a changed character, and he feels 
that the world is a big village in which everybody 
knows everything which is being thought and felt 
and said by everybody else. 

Moreover, the British Parliament is closer to the 
people than is our American Congress. Britons can 
get at their Government speedily. It is a tedious 
ordeal to get at ours. Our Constitution was framed 
in the eighteenth century, when mankind was in 
the experimental stage politically, and men were 
cautiously feeling their way toward a scheme which 
would secure both liberty and order. We have 
been so busy about many things that up to the pres 
ent we have had slight inclination to alter the ma 
chinery which our fathers devised. As a conse 
quence we have a government which at sundry points 
is antiquated. It no longer functions adequately in 
its present-day environment. So afraid of the peo 
ple were the founders of our Republic, that they 
devised a system of checks and balances which 



50 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

works with such deadly efficiency that sometimes in 
an hour of crisis democracy cannot function at all 
Our President can check the Senate, and the Senate 
can check the President, and the House can check 
them both. The President is elected for four years 
and cannot be gotten out of office before the end 
of that period, no matter what the people think of 
him or of his policies. The Senators are elected 
for six years, and they are fixtures in the Senate 
chamber till the last year is ended, no matter how 
they flout and trample on the will of the people. 
The members of the Cabinet are practically chosen 
by the President and to him alone are they re 
sponsible. It is not thus in Britain. The members 
of the British Cabinet are answerable to Parliament. 
They can be hauled before the House of Commons 
and subjected to questions whenever the House de 
sires to question them. These questions and an 
swers are spread daily before all the people. The 
British people are in more intimate and vital touch 
with their government than we are with ours* 
Again, Britain has what amounts to a referendum. 
No set of men are placed in power to hold office 
for a fixed term of years. They can be thrown out 
whenever the people desire other leaders. The 
Prime Minister has great power but he cannot retain 
his office after the people have lost confidence in 
his leadership. An adverse vote in the House of 
Commons is sufficient to upset any government, and 
compel it to go to the voters to find out whether or 
not it shall be longer sustained. It is this flexibility 
of the British governmental machinery which gives 
the British people their opportunity to make them 
selves felt at once in working out national policy. 
Government is immediately responsive to the peo 
ple's touch. It is this consciousness of power in the 



POLITICAL LIFE IN BRITAIN 51 

minds of the British voters and the knowledge that 
they may any day be called to exercise the power, 
that imparts to political discussion in Britain pe 
culiar verve and^ passion, and makes political life 
there endlessly vivacious and exciting. Democracy 
has Assumed different forms on both sides the At 
lantic, because of diverse environments, and because 
of different streams of events. Each democracy can 
learn from the other. For an American there is 
no more rewarding reading, next to the record of 
what is said and done in Washington city, than the 
story of what is said and done in the British Parlia 
ment. We are kindred peoples engaged in a vast 
and difficult experiment the experiment of making 
democracy a safe form of government for the world 
and each needs the stimulus and correction which 
the other can supply. 

An American is sure to take special interest in the 
leaders of Labor in Britain. They are on the whole 
different from ours. They are far deeper in poli 
tics. They are abler men. They are men of greater 
intellectual and moral force, and some of them have 
the high qualities of able statesmen. They are not 
men anyone can brush aside as negligible in political 
discussion and action. There are not a few Britons 
who feel that in the not-distant future Britain will 
have a Labor government. Some look forward to 
that day with gladness and others with dread. 
The Labor leaders are on the whole radical some 
of them exceedingly so. Whether when once in 
power they will be as radical in action as they are 
in theory, remains to be seen. They are all agreed 
that our present social system cannot continue, and 
that it behooves all men of sound mind to prepare 
for the order which is coming. While their methods 
of reconstruction are in many quarters criticized and 



52 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

denounced, their noble temper is appreciated, and 
the service they are rendering by keeping the ^ eyes 
of the nation on the sore spots of modern civiliza 
tion is recognized by all. 

One who knows the temper and attitude of the 
Labor leaders on the continent is surprised to find 
so many of the British Labor leaders ^ members of 
the Christian Church and workers in it. Some of 
them are lay preachers. On the continent many of 
the leaders of labor are professed atheists and most 
of them are violently anti-church, whereas in Eng 
land some of the most prominent Labor leaders ^are 
professed followers of Christ, and condemn society 
as it is now organized on the ground thaMMs not 
obedient to His commands or loyal to His ideals. 
On the continent the constant cry is for "Revolu 
tion," but in Britain the Labor slogan is: "Evolu 
tion under the guidance of the Spirit of Jesus 
Christ." 



CHAPTER VIII 
MR. DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 

Mr. Lloyd George is down and out. But some 
men cannot be kept down, nor will they stay out; 
and Mr. Lloyd George is that kind of man. He 
will be up and in again, if not tomorrow, then the 
day after. He is the most extraordinary Briton 
now alive. The British Empire has never had an 
abler prime minister, and it may wait centuries 
before it finds his equal. I never realized how he 
towered above all other men in British public life 
until I lived in Britain. Like a Colossus he did 
bestride the British world, and other men looked 
small when measured against his huge legs. By 
sheer force of mind and heart he had gotten the 
start of all the British leaders and was bearing the 
palm alone. And now lies he low and there are 
many who refuse to do him reverence. 

But his overthrow came about by a combination 
of forces which can be easily discerned and meas 
ured. It was by his virtues as well as by his defects, 
by his successes as well as by his defeats, by his 
immeasurable services as well as by his blunders 
that he fell. The public will follow no leader long. 
Aristides, great in war and peace, was ostracized at 
last, and some of the men who voted against him 
had no other reason for their hostility than that 
they were weary of hearing Aristides called "the 
Just." The incense burned before Mr. Lloyd 
George made many Britons sick. 

53 



54 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

The wonder is not that he is out, but that he was 
in so long. His position was an impossible one. 
No man can indefinitely remain leader of a coalition 
cabinet Liberals and Tories can be linked together 
for a season, but not forever. Under the pressure 
of war, extremists of different stripes can be welded 
into one, but when the pressure is reduced each 
group will go to its own place. Mr. Lloyd George 
was always displeasing some of the Tories. How 
could a man with his traditions and temperament 
fail to do that? He was always giving offense to 
some of the Liberals. How could the head of a 
cabinet in which there was powerful Tory senti 
ment which had to be reckoned with every day do 
anything else? They told me that in the Liberal 
Club his portrait had been removed from the wall 
and relegated to the cellar. His was an uncom 
fortable and precarious position from the first day 
to the last, and it is amazing that the two days were 
so far apart. He rode successfully the whirlwind 
of war, and achieved the far greater triumph of 
riding for four years the hurricane of the wildest 
peace which the world has ever known. 

His position exposed him to continuous misunder 
standing and criticism, and laid him open to serious 
and damning charges. To many he seemed a man 
devoid of principle. He was called an opportunist, 
a time-server, a trimmer. Those who hated him 
did not hesitate to call him a trickster and even a 
sharper. They forgot that a man at the head of 
a coalition cabinet must of necessity deal in com 
promises. There is no other path by which he can 
get on. It was his business to seek and find the 
middle course in which Tory and Liberal could walk 
and work together. To the idealist whose business 
it is to proclaim abstract ideals, the way of compro- 



MR. DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 55 

mise js always the way of the devil. But to the 
practical statesman who must find a path along 
which a nation is willing to walk, the ideal best is 
never possible. Politics, as Mr. John Morley long 
ago reminded us, is always the second best. 

Stating principles is one thing, and making pro 
grams is another. The prophet must proclaim 
principles but the statesman must plan programs of 
action. He must deal with prejudice and ignorance 
and passion and perversity. He must be firm, and 
at times he must yield. He must insist, but he must 
also concede. He must allow certain principles to 
lie for a time in abeyance, in order that other prin 
ciples may move forward to their coronation. He 
must sacrifice minor interests in order to get the 
major purpose through. In order to keep his coun 
trymen together along a perilous road, he must 
allow the second best to triumph for the present in 
order that the first best may come off victorious in 
the end. Such a man is sure to be suspected, mis 
judged, maligned, and hated. History is not likely 
to agree with the traducers of Mr. Lloyd George. 
Coming generations will see more clearly than is 
possible to us that his heart was true, and that even 
when he seemed to have wandered from the path, 
his eyes were on the distant and shining goal. 

If a man's greatness is to be measured by his 
power to attract and repel, then Mr. Lloyd George 
has an incontestable claim to greatness. To an 
American, there was nothing in England more un 
failingly entertaining than the clashing judgments 
of Britons on their Prime Minister. Some consid 
ered him an archangel straight from the Court of 
Heaven, while others feared him as Beelzebub, the 
prince of the devils. Often I would pass in the same 
afternoon from a group in which the Prime Minis- 



56 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

ter was crowned with laurel, to another group in 
which every man poured out upon his head the seven 
vials of his wrath. I soon found that if I wished to 
stir up an animated conversation in any part of the 
land, all that was necessary was to mention the 
name of Mr. Lloyd George. 

In one thing all Britons agree they all admit 
that Mr. Lloyd George is a great speaker. Woe to 
the man whom he gets after with his tongue ! He 
can use words which cut like sabers and which sting 
like adders. He is master of vivid and unforgetta 
ble phrases. His speeches abound in pictures. He 
never thunders, but now and then the lightning 
flashes. His most telling gestures are with his 
hands. There are few orators who use their hands 
so much as he does, and no one uses them more 
effectively. There are certain ideas which I shall 
never be able to think of again without seeing Mr. 
Lloyd George's hands. He speaks quietly and with 
deliberation. His words fall sometimes upon the 
heart like flakes of fire. He wins his audience by 
his candor and simplicity, his friendliness and com 
mon sense. Even the hearts of his enemies are 
sometimes softened by the touch of his magical 
words, and, forgetting their prejudices, men are 
swept away on the current of his persuasive speech. 

I was impressed by his radiant vitality. He is a 
live man. I saw him for the first time the evening 
he returned from the Conference in Genoa. It had 
been a long-drawn, vexatious, unsuccessful confer 
ence. Mr. Lloyd George came out of that con 
ference defeated. I expected to see disappointment 
in his eyes. I was sure there would be marks of 
fatigue upon his face. The man who met my gaze 
was a man with a fresh and buoyant look. He had 
the air of one who was just returning from a holi- 



MR. DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 57 

day. He looked as a man looks when he has beaten 
his opponent in a game of golf. When later on, I 
stood face to face in conversation with him, I was 
still more deeply impressed by the freshness of 
his countenance. He looked like a man who had 
never had a care or trouble. He shook hands with 
acquaintances and friends with the jovial air of a 
man of leisure. I asked myself: "How can Atlas 
carry the world on his shoulders, and have a face 
like that?" He looked as though he slept soundly 
every night, but how could a man sleep when he had 
on his mind the Irish tragedy, and the Russian 
chaos, and the French entanglement, and the Turk 
ish peril, and the Palestine muddle, and the taxation 
nightmare, and the unemployment horror, and a 
score of other perplexities and burdens? One would 
think that the solid flesh would melt, thaw and re 
solve itself into a dew! But this Welshman ^ does 
not allow himself to be flustered by public business. 
While in the midst of all these ponderous cares of 
state, he had time to entertain friends and strangers 
at breakfast and now and then to attend an after 
noon garden party, and occasionally to give an ^ ad 
dress in some church or at some civic function. 
Within a few days last summer, he gave a lecture, 
on John Wesley, and delivered an oration on Maz- 
zini, and addressed nearly four hundred clergymen 
at a luncheon on the Church and War. He has 
evidently tasted of the spring of perpetual youth. 
His face cannot be furrowed and his back cannot 
be bent. They told me in Bournemouth that when 
he plays golf on Saturday with Dr. J. D. Jones, he 
remains over to hear Kim preach on Sunday, and 
that he sings the hymns with the gusto and abandon 
of a boy. Here, then, is a wonderful man who can 
carry the greatest of the world's empires on his 



58 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

back, with the tempest beating in his face and still 
sing! 

He has a genius for getting things done. That 
was a gift sorely needed during the war, and so he 
was transposed from one position to another until 
he arrived at the post of Prime Minister. When 
ever there was a job which was peculiarly hard he 
was called. He always responded and he never 
failed. The list of his achievements is a long one. 
At the head of the list will forever stand the settle 
ment of the Irish problem. Many of Britain's 
greatest had worked on that, and in vain. This 
man tried it and succeeded. He is a miracle-worker, 
a wizard, this little lawyer from Wales. 

His moral qualities are as fine as the faculties of 
his mind. He has self-control and patience and 
courage. He dared to fight even the great Lord 
Northcliffe, the Napoleon of modern journalists, the 
giant of the newspaper world. Politicians are al 
ways afraid of mighty journalists. Even statesmen 
walk with wary step in their presence. Here was a 
journalist of extraordinary stature and renown. 
He owned many papers. He raised up and cast 
down when he would. He gave orders to Mr. 
Lloyd George, and Mr. Lloyd George refused to 
obey him.^ He defied him. Northcliffe hurled at 
him all his thunderbolts but in vain, and North 
cliffe, broken in body and mind, went down into his 
grave with the Prime Minister still on his throne. 
There is no more thrilling chapter in modern his 
tory than that which recounts the defeat of the jour 
nalist Goliath by this Welsh David. 

In trying to account for the power of this man, 
we must not leave out his religion. Mr. Lloyd 
George is a religious man, a member of the Chris 
tian church. He believes in Jesus Christ. He <ha$ 



MR. DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 59 

never concealed his faith. He believes in the church. 
He attends its worship. He reads its history. He 
revels in the biographies of its leaders and saints. 
He is very sure of God. This gives him endurance 
and hope. He is an optimist. In the darkest days 
of the war, it was always light where he was. He is 
not discouraged by difficulties, nor depressed by 
obstacles, nor swerved by opposition, nor embittered 
by abuse. Resistance endows him with new powers. 
He is a stormy petrel whose element is the tempest. 
He is an internationalist. He is a hater of war. 
He is a believer in the League of Nations. He 
believes in the Parliament of Man, the Federation 
of the World. He is the friend of America. He 
may visit us some day. When he comes, he will 
receive the greatest ovation ever given to a states 
man from beyond the seas. 



CHAPTER IX 

ANGLO-AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP 

Mr. Walter H. Page, one of our greatest am 
bassadors to Great Britain, wrote many wise things, 
but none wiser than this: U I do know something 
about the British. I know enough to make very 
sure of the soundness of my conclusion that they 
are necessary to us, and we to them, else God would 
have permitted the world to be peopled in some 
other way." There are reasons why the United 
States should cultivate the friendship of all the' 
nations of the earth, but there are special reasons 
why she should begin with Great Britain. There 
are reasons why America should be the ally of all 
nations in the great struggle for liberty and justice, 
but the nation with which it is easiest and most natu 
ral for her to unite is Britain. One can think of ^ 
union of the United States and Russia, the United 
States and Spain, the United States and Japan, but 
all these seem artificial combinations compared with 
the union of the United States and Britain. We be 
long together, as Page said. We are necessary to 
each other. 

It is easier for us to work together than it is for 
us to work with any other foreign people, because, 
in the first place, we speak the same language. We 
can understand each other without the aid of an in 
terpreter. It is not easy to think in a foreign tongue. 
A difference of language is always a barrier in inter- 

60 



ANGLO-AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP . v . 

national intercourse. It can be surmounted but not 
without effort. When we converse with Britain, we 
are mutually intelligible from the start. 

We have the same traditions, legal and social and 
ecclesiastical. We are a conglomerate people. 
Many nations have made their contribution to our 
life. Within the lafit hundred years 31,319,000 
Russians have entered our gates; 4,078,000 Austro- 
Hungarians; 4,218,000 Italians; and 5,500,000 
Germans. All these have brought with them in 
herited characteristics and customs. Each racial 
stock has left its mark on our thought and feeling, 
and has variously modified our career. But all of 
these foreign countries put together have not ex 
erted the influence on our national character which 
has been exerted by the 8,333,000 Britons who have 
found a home under our flag. In the first place, the 
British immigrants have for the most part been 
men and women of superior quality. The immi 
grants from Russia have been almost entirely from 
the peasant class, and the same is true of the immi 
grants from Italy. Germany has sent us not a few 
from her upper classes, but the bulk of the Germans 
have come from her peasant population. On the 
other hand, multitudes who have come from Eng : 
land and Scotland and Wales have been educated 
and resourceful men of high social standing, intel 
lectually and morally equipped to become active 
forces in the shaping of community life. These Brit 
ish immigrants have come at strategic times in the 
course of our national development. Between 1620 
and 1640, there came to New England 25,000 Eng 
lishmen who exerted a greater influence upon the 
civilization of the New World than any other 
25,000 people who have ever crossed the Atlantic. 
These Englishmen laid educational foundations 



62 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

which have exerted a molding power over the Amer 
ican mind and heart through nearly three hundred 
years. These men cut channels through which 
American feeling has flowed to the present hour. 
They created reservoirs of life from which refresh 
ing streams have flowed all the way to the Pacific. 
It is because our colleges and universities were 
nearly all founded by men molded by British culture 
and dominated by British ideals that the soul of 
Britain has been stamped upon the American people 
as has been the soul of no other nation. We have 
learned to think at the feet of Britain. It is her 
poets who sing to us. What foreign poets can com 
pare with Shakespeare and Milton, Byron and 
Burns, Tennyson and Browning, in inspirational 
power over American hearts? We are not ignorant 
of the statesmen of other lands, but certainly our 
American boys are more familiar with Cobden and 
Bright, Disraeli and Gladstone, Chamberlain and 
Lloyd George, than with the statesmen of any other 
European country. The treasure house of English 
literature is open to us because we have the key. No 
other foreign novelists have ever found so large a 

S'ace in our hearts as that occupied by Scott and 
ickens, Thackeray and Trollope, George Eliot 
and Rudyard Kipling. Nations fed on the same 
intellectual meat come at last to possess similar 
aspirations and entertain like ambitions. It is fitting 
that they should work together in noble causes. 

But it does not follow that two nations will be 
friends because they speak the same language and 
read the same books. There are reasons why the 
maintenance of friendship between America and 
Britain is especially difficult. Language is a pos 
sible blessing, but it is also a source of embarrass 
ment. We always know what the British are say- 



ANGLO-AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP 63 

ing about us, and it would be well sometimes if we 
did not know. They also know what we are saying, 
and this is not always conducive to an increase of 
friendly feeling. Not a sarcastic or cutting word 
spoken by either side escapes the other. Both na 
tions have cultivated the freedom of speech to the 
point of license, and Britons and Americans are 
alike in being sometimes brutally frank. We speak 
oftener of Britons than of any other foreigners, and 
in our talk there is sure to be many a foolish word. 
Britons also sin with their tongue. "Behold how 
great a matter a little fire kindleth." The tongue 
is indeed a fire. It sets on fire the course of nature, 
which includes London and New York, and some 
times there is no doubt that "it is set on fire of hell." 

We are in especial danger of clashing because we 
are so much alike. We are commercial above all 
other peoples, and we go to the ends of the earth in 
search of trade. Both of us are keen for conces 
sions. We itch for special privileges. Both of us 
want the earth. It is natural that we should again 
and again step on one another's toes and fall into 
ugly humors. Commerce works for peace, and it 
also works for war. Because the Briton and Amer 
ican are adepts in exploitation, it is inevitable that 
there should be occasional clashes. In reaching for 
oil wells and gold mines, both nations forget some 
times their good manners. 

Then again, we are not unlike in disposition. If 
the Briton is arrogant, the American is bumptious. 
Neither one likes to be talked down by the other, 
and yet that is what both are inclined to do. Arro 
gance passes easily into insolence, and insolence set* 
ties down into contempt and hatred. If we were 
more different in temperament we should be less 
likely to quarrel. 



64 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

Moreover, both peoples have memories which are 
not pleasant. A Briton does not forget that Amer 
ica was once an English colony, and an American 
does not forget by what process that relationship 
was discontinued. It is foolish to remember un 
pleasant things so long, but people do it, and it is 
not easy to change human nature. One of the black 
est curses of war is that it lives in the memory for 
generations. Americans do not forget the war of 
1776, or the war of 1812, or the war of 1861, nor 
do Britons forget them either. It is because of 
these memories, which, like smouldering subter 
ranean fires, burn on in the heart, that we need to 
cultivate with unflagging zeal the feelings of ap 
preciation and good will. The past becomes a curse 
when we allow it to spoil the present and blight the 
future. Britons now alive are not responsible for 
what their fathers did in the eighteenth century; 
nor are we accountable for what our fathers did. 
We are responsible for the building of a happier 
and nobler world. Remembering wrongs eats up 
strength, and nourishing feelings of resentment is 
degrading. The heart is healthy only when it 
is sweet. Life is strong only when the spirit is 
friendly. Instead of brooding over George III., it 
is more profitable to brood over Edmund Burke, 
and instead of meditating on Lord North, it is 
more sensible to meditate on Charles James Fox. 
The most English section of the English people 
have always been our friends. They stood with us 
through the revolutionary war and through our civil 
war, and they will in every coming crisis be found 
standing by our side. There is a higher Britain, as 
there is a higher America; a coarser and more 
earthy Britain as there is a coarser and more earthy 
America. It is important that the better America 



ANGLO-AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP 65 

and the better Britain join hands in working for the 
betterment of the world. There are great tasks to 
be accomplished in the coming years. There are 
mighty perils to be met, vexing problems to be 
solved, giant enemies to be combated. No one na 
tion alone is sufficient for the arduous work which 
lies just ahead. Kindred nations must get together. 
They must consolidate their strength. Britain and 
America should work together because of their 
enormous size. The biggest of the empires and the 
biggest of the republics belong together in the great 
conflict for mankind. For these two giants to hold 
aloof from each other would be a betrayal of hu 
manity. They are tEe two richest of all nations. 
Gold has been given to them above all others. The 
gold must be spent in the service of the human race. 
To squander it in arraying themselves one against 
the other would be a crime, for which there could 
be no forgiveness. They are close together phys 
ically. The Atlantic is but a brook, and even India 
is not far away. In the Western World the two 
nations touch. We have a common boundary of 
3898 miles. That is the most beautiful boundary 
line upon the planet. In all its vast length there is 
not a fort, not a gun. That line is a revelation and 
a prophecy. It reveals the disposition of the two 
nations. We trust each other. We are neighbors; 
we are friends. Friends we are going to remain 
forever. 

When nations are friends they help one another. 
At the Washington conference, on the reduction of 
armaments, Britain in the person of Mr. Balfour 
came to our assistance. When Mr. Hughes, our 
Secretary of State, laid before the conference the 
radical and amazing proposals of the American 
Government, Mr. Balfour promptly arose and de- 



66 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

clared the willingness of the British Empire to fall 
in with the American plan. His ^ attitude rendered 
it impossible for the other nations to stay out. 
They all came in. Britain and America standing 
together set the pace for all the world. In that 
hour it was made clear again what is the power of 
these two mighty nations when on any point of 
world policy they are agreed. There is no reform 
too great to hope for if only the two English-speak 
ing nations work together. There is no sore^on the 
body of humanity which cannot be healed if only 
Britain and America combine their skill. 

But nations cannot work effectively together un 
less they like each other. The hearts must be at 
tuned, before the hands can do their perfect work. 
There must be a disarmament of the heart. Suspi 
cions must be cast out. Ugly feelings must be over 
thrown. Hasty and irritating words must* be dis 
carded. Mutual confidence must be established in 
the hearts of the common people, and good will 
must be permanently enthroned. It is not to be 
expected that all Britons will think like all Ameri 
cans, or that Americans will agree in all points with 
their British brethren. Uniformity of opinion is 
not essential to a genuine and rewarding friendship. 
Again and again we shall differ in opinion, and our 
policies on divers matters will be far apart, but this 
need not break or even mar our friendship. Our 
ideals are one, our purposes are one, our spirit is 
the same, and therefore war between us in "unthink 
able," as Roosevelt long ago declared, and a grow 
ing friendship is natural and wholesome and to be 
expected. By the decree of the King of Heaven, 
we are comrades and friends, coworkers in the great 
enterprise of bringing the whole earth under the 
sovereignty of Love. 



CHAPTER X 

FOES OF INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP 

Friendship is a delicate plant and is easily broken 
or blighted. It is a fragile creation, and to be pre 
served must be carefully safeguarded. Dr. Samuel 
Johnson reminded us long ago how important it is 
to keep one's friendships in repair. International 
friendships are especially complex and unstable, and, 
one of their most deadly foes is neglect. Nations 
drift apart as individuals do through carelessness, 
and ignorance of the fundamental laws of life. It 
is only by conscious effort that two nations can be 
kept together in mutual sympathy and good will. 
If they ignore each other, they become in time vic 
tims of suspicion, and all the other unholy feelings 
which work mischief in the world. It is not enough 
that friendly feelings should exist in the heart, they 
must be expressed. Only the sentiments which find 
expression are likely to survive. Two nations which 
wish their lives to become intimately and helpfully 
intertwined must lose no opportunity to express 
publicly the sentiment of mutual good will. By 
public and official acts the national attitude should 
be made clear to the people. Diplomats are never 
more profitably employed than when they are, ex 
pressing to one another the higher aspirations and 
purposes of their respective governments. It is a 
revelation of the tardy progress of mankind in ra 
tional living that every nation has a Secretary of 

67 



68 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

War and no nation has a Secretary of International 
Friendship. If nations had given themselves to prep 
aration for peace with half the zeal with which they 
have given themselves to preparation for war, the 
world would have been saved innumerable tragedies, 
and the outlook for humanity would be today im 
measurably brighter. Forming international friend 
ships and maintaining them is a business which 
should be pursued with great diligence and enthusi 
asm through the generations. Great Britain and 
the United States have no more momentous task 
before them than the task of cultivating and ex 
pressing cordial relations to each other. It is on 
the basis of good feeling that all cooperative enter 
prises must be built. Without friendly feeling all 
efforts to construct programs of action must prove 
futile. Britain and America should cultivate the 
art of friendly speech. Taciturnity is an enemy to 
be feared. 

And so also is ignorance. Ignorance is a moth 
which chews up the purple fabric of international 
friendship. Because nations live apart from one 
another they must of necessity lack that personal 
acquaintance on the part of the masses of the peo 
ple which is so essential in keeping the mind clear 
of estranging illusions. It is a singular fact that we 
have a tendency to dislike the people whom we do 
not know. One of the worst perversities of the 
heart is its proneness to imagine dark things of 
people far away. In the ancient barbaric world a 
stranger was always counted an enemy. We have 
not entirely outgrown this feature of barbarism. 
Because we do not know foreigners, we become sus 
picious of them, and picture them planning evil 
things against us. Our suspicions deepen into fear, 
and fear if allowed to do its perfect work, builds 



FOES OF INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP 69 

up a deep-seated feeling of dislike. In a crisis the 
dislike may flame up in a fiery hatred. Against ig 
norance then we must wage everlasting warfare. 
Knowledge is essential to a world which would be 
happy. When we come to know people in foreign 
lands we find them amazingly like ourselves. They 
are not hostile to us nor are they hatching infernal 
schemes against us. They want to be our friends. 
They hate, war and love peace. They are our broth 
ers. The habit of speaking disrespectfully of for 
eign nations is a habit which ought to be broken. 
Children in the home should be trained by their 
parents to speak in friendly words of every foreign 
nation. A sneer at foreigners should be instantly 
rebuked. Teachers in the schools have no more 
important duty than training their pupils to hold 
the^ right attitude to foreign peoples. Racial 
prejudice should be rooted out. National animosi 
ties should not be allowed to grow. What does the 
world gain by instructing the intellect in language, 
literature and science if the heart is allowed to re 
main a nest of ugly and bitter feelings? No youth 
is properly educated who does not look with friendly 
eyes on all the nations of the earth. We shall never 
have a warless world until our schools become nurs 
eries of good will. 

Another foe of international friendship is a de 
graded form of patriotism. Patriotism is a virtue, 
but like all virtues it can be counterfeited and per 
verted. It is a noble passion, but like all passions 
it can become diseased and pernicious. Patriotism 
is love of country, and so long as it is that, it is 
commendable and ennobling. But when patriotism 
becomes hatred of foreign nations, it is degrading- 
The man who measures his patriotism by his con 
tempt for some other nation is both ignorant and 



70 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

vicious. Men like him are a stumbling-block in the 
path of human progress. No country has reason to 
be proud of a man who cares for no country but 
his own. It is because of this degenerate form of 
patriotism that demagogues flourish and that jin 
goes are extolled by the ignorant as national heroes 
and saviors. In every national legislature the jingo 
is sure to be found, and wherever he exists, he works 
havoc with international friendship. A group of 
jingoes in two countries can, unless resisted, break 
all the ties of good will and postpone indefinitely 
the coming of the Golden Age. The men who 
prate most about their patriotism are sometimes 
among our most dangerous citizens. An astute 
Englishman, disgusted by the selfishness and dis 
honesty of the patriots of his day, once defined pa 
triotism as the last refuge of a scoundrel. It is 
worse than that. It is one of the most plausible 
instruments yet devised for setting nations against 
one another. Beware of the patriot whose stock 
in trade is contempt for all nations but his own! 

In the list of enemies of international friendship 
journalists of the baser sort must be given a high 
place. The daily press when in the hands of men 
without principle becomes a firebrand for starting 
international conflagrations. More than once with 
in the last fifty years war has been precipitated by 
the frenzied utterances of an unscrupulous press. 
The freedom of the press is a blessing, but it has 
brought with it a long procession of curses. Men 
cannot safely be trusted with as much power as has 
been granted to the modern journalist. When his 
heart is noble he has vast opportunity for blessing 
the world, but when his conscience is undeveloped 
and his spirit is satanic, his power to work mischief 



FOES OF INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP 71 

is appallingly immense. Our generation has been 
peculiarly plagued by a large number of journalists 
who have had regard neither for God nor man. 
When some future Dante writes the Divine Comedy 
of our day, he will reserve the lowest round in hell 
for the journalists who have betrayed their trust. 
No millionaire can so defile society and blight the 
hopes of mankind as can a millionaire with an evil 
heart who owns a newspaper. By the pens of a 
gang of anonymous liars and slanderers and rumor- 
mongers he can defile the wells of international 
good will and inject into the minds of millions a 
subtle poison which works constantly for the dead 
ening of all the friendly feelings of the heart By 
his pen he can fill the world with ill-natured gossip, 
and disquieting conjectures, and plausible rumors 
which are only lies. He can criticize with insolent 
speech the policy of foreign governments against 
which he holds a personal grudge, and can hold up 
to ridicule day after day the official servants of 
friendly peoples. Like a pagan god he can throw 
thunderbolts at the heads of Kings and Princes, of 
diplomats and legislators, increasing the fever of 
the world's heart and making all of the world's 
problems more difficult to solve. Every country is 
plagued today with this sort of pest, and no escape 
from his ravages has as yet been discovered. The 
world has many intricate and baffling problems, but 
not one of them is more difficult or more momentous 
than the problem of reforming the Press. How to 
convert it from a war-making engine into an agency 
working constantly for peace, is one of those colos 
sal tasks to which future generations must bend 
their mind. Already there are high-minded servants 
of humanity not a few of whom are devoting them- 



72 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

selves by their pen to the divine work of drawing 
nations closer together and laying the foundations 
of a warless world. Their number will increase. 

Among the crowned mischief-makers of our^ gen 
eration Big Business holds a conspicuous position. 
It was Big Business which brought on the Boer 
War, and it was Big Business which caused Russia 
to fling herself upon Japan. It was Big Business 
which worked along with other forces to ^ bring on 
the greatest of all the wars. Ours is an industrial 
age and to keep the mills and f actories^ all running, 
the world must be ransacked day and night for raw 
materials. Oil and rubber, coal and timber, gold 
and silver and copper and iron,^ these are the treas 
ures for which the hands of nations are itching, and 
to obtain them multitudes of men are putting forth 
all their strength. The world is manipulated today 
largely by its manufacturers and merchants, its 
bankers and financiers. Every nation has its pro 
moters and exploiters, its investors and concession 
seekers. Markets and raw materials and cheap 
labor are not these the good things the great pow 
ers are seeking evermore ? To^ assist them in their 
quest, powerful groups of capitalists make use of 
the foreign office of their government, and thus be 
come the dictators of national policy. It was com 
mercial greed which piled up the colossal arma 
ment which precipitated the Great War. It is this 
same greed which is now at the bottom of the^ un 
rest in Europe, and which is prompting all nations 
to fight one another with tariffs and all sorts of 
trade restrictions. How can the world^ever settle 
down in peace until this wild and insatiable greed 
for markets and raw products is reduced? ^Britain 
and America are rivals in the most attractive and 
dangerous of all fields the field of making money. 



FOES OF INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP 73 

Even well-meaning and high-minded men sometimes 
become overbearing and unscrupulous when they are 
running fast for great prizes. When we begin to 
count the forces which work against international 
friendship we must not omit greed. 

The ignorant man, the insolent jingo, the un 
scrupulous journalist, the greedy* commercial ex 
ploiter, these four are to be found in all countries, 
and because they exist, a fifth man becomes neces 
sary the military-naval expert. He is the fifth 
finger of the hand which is crushing the world. In 
order that his nation may have its place in the sun, 
this military specialist studies the science and art 
of war. He works out plans of attack and defense. 
He invents new instruments of destruction. He 
computes the adequate sizes of armies and navies. 
He makes out the navy and army budgets, grasping 
as much of the national income as possible. He 
does not love war, but he is always thinking about 
war. It is his profession. Because he is always 
thinking war, he is always talking it. He cannot 
help it. When he has opportunity, he writes about 
it. His one theme is "preparedness." That is 
something which no nation has ever yet possessed. 
It is an ideal which ever lures us on. When he re 
tires at an early age on a generous pension, he gives 
all the remainder of his life to thinking and talk 
ing war. In this way he fans suspicion, and feeds 
fear, and makes it more difficult for nations to be 
friends. 



CHAPTER XI 
PROHIBITION AND THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS 

Britons are keenly alive to the fortunes of Pro 
hibition in the United States. Every reporter who 
asked me for an interview, had Prohibition at the 
top of his list of questions. The British papers give 
more attention to our Eighteenth Amendment than 
to any other feature of our American life. Many 
papers exploit daily the failure of Prohibition. 
They could not do it more zealously if they were 
paid for it. Sad stories of the havoc which Pro 
hibition has wrought in the morals of the youth of 
America, especially the young women, are spread 
broadcast. The leading evening paper of London 
last June had a reporter in New York who made a 
practice of visiting the haunts of our fast set, sending 
home long accounts of what he saw and heard. The 
paper was considered decent, but it was engaged in 
an indecent piece of work. Similar stories of vul 
garity and excess could be cabled every night from 
London, where Prohibition is unknown; but how 
can humanity be helped by the recital of what the 
coarsest and lowest are doing? The British press 
is on the whole anti-Prohibition. In the journalists 
of Britain the liquor hierarchy has its most devoted 
and influential defenders. British brewers and dis 
tillers are longing for the failure of Prohibition in 
this country, and they diligently parade every word 
spoken against it in our American papers. They 

74 



PROHIBITION AND LEAGUE OF NATIONS 75 

know that if Prohibition succeeds here, the liquor 
traffic in Britain is doomed. An increasing number 
of ^ Britons every year awaken to the fact that 
Britain is sorely handicapped in her struggle for a 
place in the sun by her love of drink She is an in 
dustrial and commercial nation. She lives on her 
factories and commerce. If she falls behind in 
these, she is forever undone. To keep alive she 
must successfully compete with her most formidable 
rival the United States. We have adopted the 
policy of Prohibition. That policy we are not likely 
to change. We are going to stop the enormous 
waste in energy and efficiency which the liquor traffic 
annually entailed. We are going to roll off the 
stupendous burden which we have carried for over 
a hundred years. We cannot do it at once, but we 
are going to do it. Our workers, freed from the 
poison of an enemy which befuddles the brain and 
curtails the strength of the arm, will through the 
next generations work with augmented vigor and 
effectiveness. Britain half drunk will be no match 
for America sober. Britain must become sober. 
She must overthrow her Liquor Dynasty. The 
public house must be abolished. It will be done, 
but not now. The British take their time to accom 
plish great undertakings, but in the end they 
conquer. 

There is a rising sentiment in Britain against 
alcohol. I found it everywhere. The contrast 
between public opinion today and what it ^ was 
twenty-five years ago amazed me. Total-abstainers 
have multiplied. At all the dinners and banquets, 
I was impressed by the numbers who did not drink 
wine. From thousands of homes liquor has-been 
banished. Manyi organizations are energetically 
working to create a public sentiment which will in 



76 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

this generation overthrow the Liquor Goliath. The 
foes of alcohol in high circles are numerous and 
outspoken. To move in the best society it is not 
necessary to drink. Britons are allowed to drink 
the health of the King in water. 

But anti-alcohol sentiment is not so far advanced 
in Britain as it is in our country. There are vari 
ous reasons. The liquor traffic in the United States 
gradually drifted into the hands of foreigners. 
Many of them were reckless and unsavory. In 
Britain the liquor traffic is in the hands of Britons, 
and some of them are representatives of ancient 
and noble families. This fact has a vast influence 
on popular feeling. Moreover, the public house in 
Britain has never become quite what the American 
saloon became. It is low, but not so low as our 
saloon was. In many places our saloon had become 
the rendezvous of thugs and harlots, a center of 
political propaganda, a vicious force in civic admin 
istration, and a scourge in community life. It had 
become not only a disgrace, but a peril. There was 
nothing to do but to abolish it. 

The Church of England has never taken the ag 
gressive and radical attitude to the drink evil which 
has been taken by thousands of our churches. The 
clergy of the Anglican church have in large num 
bers always had ale and wine on their tables. The 
people as a rule do not move faster than their lead 
ers. Liquor dealers have never fallen under the 
disapprobation of the English church, and large 
gifts from them are freely and openly accepted. 

Finally, there is an ingrained conservatism in the 
Briton which compels him to go slow in making 
changes. He clings tenaciously to customs which 
are old even though they be a handicap and burden, 
and he is loath to overturn institutions even though 



PROHIBITION AND LEAGUE OF NATIONS 77 

they have been outgrown. All these constitute a 
bulwark of protection for the liquor traffic against 
which the forces of the new age will for a long time 
yet beat in vain. But the ultimate outcome is cer 
tain. Drink has been for centuries the besetting sin 
of the Anglo-Saxon race. The annual consumption 
of alcoholic drinks in Britain is appalling. It was 
Mr. Gladstone who once declared in the House of 
Commons that the ravages of drink equaled the 
combined ravages of famine, pestilence and war. 
During the Great War, Mr. Lloyd George stated 
in public that the most dangerous enemy of Britain 
was not Germany but drink. I was told more than 
once that Prohibition is sure to come in Scotland 
and that it will come sooner there than in England. 
The Scots are aroused, and when they once get their 
eyes on a foe, they fight with grim and deadly 
determination. Common sense will finally save 
both Scotland and England. A nation which has 
a debt of over forty billion dollars, and an annual 
budget of six billion dollars, and an annual interest 
account of two billion dollars, cannot afford to 
spend two billion dollars a year on alcoholic drink. 
The apologists for alcohol may fool all of the 
people some of the time, and some of the people 
all of the time, but they cannot fool all of the 
people all of the time. Some day Britain and 
America will walk side by side in the procession of 
nations emancipated from the ancient curse of 
drink. 

While Britain lags behind us in Prohibition senti 
ment, in her international thinking she is far ahead 
of us. She has the international mind, the interna 
tional heart, and the international conscience in a 
high stage of development. We are yet in the juve 
nile period of growth. At the third meeting of the 



78 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

Assembly of the League of Nations held in Geneva 
in the month of September, 1922, Britain was repre 
sented by Earl Balfour, Lord Robert Cecil, and 
Professor Gilbert Murray, while the United States 
was not represented at all. Britain sent her best, 
we sent no one. A company of American tourists 
sat in the gallery looking on. A group of Ameri 
can newspaper reporters sat at the press tables 
reporting what the nations were doing. They could 
not tell the world of anything their own country 
was doing. Before the Assembly met for business, 
it listened to a sermon preached By the Archbishop 
of Canterbury. Britain sent to Genoa her foremost 
ecclesiastical leader. Not long before, her Prime 
Minister, Mr. Lloyd George, had declared in public 
that the hope of the world lies in the success of the 
League of Nations, and that if it fails civilization 
is doomed. I found the leading clergymen in the 
Anglican church ardent supporters of the League, 
and the leaders of the free churches were not a 
whit behind them in loyalty and zeal. At a great 
demonstration for the League on Saturday after 
noon in Hyde Park, I heard representatives of all 
the churches voice their adherence to the League. 
Among the speakers were Lord Robert Cecil and 
the Archbishop of York. It was raining, but the 
rain did not dampen the earnestness of the speakers 
or the enthusiasm of the audience. 

One of the unfading pictures of my life in Britain 
is the picture of the Archbishop of York extolling 
the League of Nations in a park to a crowd of Eng 
lishmen under umbrellas ! Englishmen had said 
during the Great War, "This shall be the last war," 
and this accounts for their fiery zeal for the success 
of the League. Unless the nations of the world 
are leagued for peace, another world war is in- 



PROHIBITION AND LEAGUE OF NATIONS 79 

evitable. This conviction lies deep in the British 
heart. Wherever I went, I found this flame of 
enthusiasm burning. All over England there are 
local unions of the League of Nations, organiza 
tions created for the purpose of educating the people 
in the purposes and possibilities of the League. 
When I went into the homes of prominent laymen, 
I often found the whole family enlisted in the work 
of advancing the League. To a Briton the League 
of Nations is a solid and glorious reality. 

I felt I was in a new world. I had come from a 
land where it was commonly reported that the 
League was dead. The rumor had never reached 
England. I had often read in our papers that the 
League was a failure. These papers had forgotten 
to announce that fifty-one nations were members of 
it. In my country the preachers were for the most 
part dumb, not daring to mention the League either 
in sermon or prayer lest they should lay themselves 
open to the charge of meddling in politics. It 
seemed strange to be among Christians who stead 
fastly believed that the League is an instrument in 
the hands of Heaven for securing the establishment 
of the Kingdom of God, and that it is a plan to 
which all Christians are by their profession of faith 
implicitly committed. I had lived in a land where 
many intelligent and noble men were entirely indif 
ferent to the League, and where others equally 
noble and intelligent found it impossible to discuss 
the League with their friends without losing their 
temper. The stone which our American builders 
had rejected I found British builders making the 
head of the corner. So contemptible and perilous 
had the League become in the eyes of my country 
men that many of them preferred to stay out of 
the League with Mexico and Turkey rather than 



8o THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

enter the League with Great Britain and France. 
Internationally we are a belated people. 

There are reasons why Britain should be ahead 
of us. She has been in school for a long time. Her 
far-flung frontiers have compelled her to think in 
world terms. She has been obliged to carry on her 
mind India and Canada, South Africa and Austra 
lia, Egypt and Ceylon, and this has given the Briton 
range of sympathy and wide horizon. Moreover, 
she is nearer to Europe than we are. When Europe 
catches fire, her own edifice is immediately in 
danger. This compels the thoughtful Briton to 
give to Europe continuous attention. Europe is 
always in his eye and ear. We Americans are geo 
graphically remote. We lie behind the barriers of 
two mighty oceans. Our neighbors to the north 
and south are small, and we have leisure to con 
centrate our mind on our own internal affairs. 
We are a world in ourself. Our territory is vast, 
our resources are incalculable, our problems are 
many and urgent, our domestic difficulties vexing 
and baffling, and the average American has not yet 
come to feel that he is under obligations to concern 
himself seriously with the problems of people who 
live far away. He is always ready to send money 
contributions to any nation in distress, but beyond 
this his education has not carried him. His heart 
is sound but his experience has given him no train 
ing in international thinking. He is a citizen of 
America but not of the world. 

It is the glory of Britain that in this great time 
she has given the full weight of her power and pres 
tige to the only practical scheme thus far devised 
by the genius of man which offers possible deliver 
ance from the tragedy of another world war. With 
out the support of Britain the scheme would in- 



PROHIBITION AND LEAGUE OF NATIONS 81 

evitably have failed. The League of Nations is an 
experiment, difficult and fraught with peril. Only 
men of vision and heroic mettle can be expected to 
commit themselves to so hazardous and beautiful a 
hope. Britain in her statesmen and prophets has 
declared to all the world that she is willing to take 
the risk and to bear her full share of the burden. 



CHAPTER XII 
THE MISSION OF THE CHURCH 

u Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the 
nations. 5 ' These, according to the Gospel of St. 
Matthew, are the last words of the Founder of the 
Christian religion. Christianity is a world religion. 
"God so loved the world that He gave His only 
begotten Son." "God is the Father of all." "All 
men are brethren." "God has made of one all the 
nations of the earth." "There cannot be Greek 
and Jew, circumcision and uncircumcision, barba 
rian, Scythian, bondman, freeman; but Christ is all 
and in all." "The field is the world." The B Chris 
tian church must carry the entire world in its eye 
and the whole human race on its heart. 

The religion of Jesus Christ has to do not simply 
with individuals but with nations. His Church 
must deal with empires and republics. It is futile 
to train individuals to act toward one another like 
Christians, if nations are left to treat one another 
like barbarians. Individuals cannot successfully 
worship Christ while nations continue to burn in 
cense to Mars. The Church cannot win respect 
for so-called Christian nations so long as those 
nations dress in armor. It cannot induce adherents 
of other religions in great numbers to believe in 
Jesus Christ as the Savior of the World so long as 
nations which profess to follow Him spend their 
time in the manufacture of poison gases for the 

82 



THE MISSION OF THE CHURCH 83 

purpose of destroying other nations, and in drilling 
men in the art of dropping asphyxiating bombs on 
defenseless cities. We cannot induce young men 
to ^ believe in the Golden Rule while they are being 
drilled in the art of jabbing sharpened steel into 
human abdomens. We cannot persuade men to 
give themselves to a God of love while the Govern 
ment is industriously sharpening the instruments of 
hate. Why attempt to pray when the prayers are 
drowned by the thunder of target practice? Of 
what advantage is it to save souls when diplomats 
and statesmen and journalists are permitted to 
plunge the whole world into hell? 

Here, then, is the supreme duty of the Church of 
God in our generation. It must enter boldly into 
the realm of international life and claim everything 
for Christ. The Church has a world message and 
a world responsibility. The law of love is binding 
on governments, and civil officials are all answer 
able to God. It is impossible to make permanent 
progress until governments become Christian in dis 
position and purpose. Statesmen and rulers must 
act on the principles of service and sacrifice or be 
thrown out of office by the Christian people. To 
make their government Christian is the first duty 
of Christian men. It is the mission of the Church 
to establish on this earth the Kingdom of God, 
which is righteousness and peace and joy. The 
world cannot be joyful without peace, and the world 
cannot have peace without justice. Just as long as 
governments treat other nations unfairly, we shall 
have a world torn periodically by war. There can 
be no abiding peace unless political leaders love jus 
tice. The Church cannot secure peace if statesmen 
pursue policies which are wrong. The Church can 
not abolish war if governments persist in piling up 



84 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

explosives. The mission of the Church is not to 
declaim against the horror of war but to overthrow 
governments which pursue policies which make war 
inevitable. The Church exists to create a friendly 
world. We cannot have a friendly world until gov 
ernments get rid of their pagan traditions and dis 
positions. The Church must make disciples of the 
nations, teaching them to observe all things what 
soever Christ has commanded. 

In the work of creating a more friendly world the 
Church must begin in the home. Children must 
be trained from the beginning to speak respectfully 
of foreign nations. All insulting epithets applied 
to foreigners must be taken from their tongue. 
Other peoples should not be spoken of scornfully 
at the dinner table by Christian parents. Children 
early get the temper and attitude of their elders. 
In every Christian home every nation, which is men 
tioned in conversation, should be spoken of in the 
language of appreciation and good will. The 
schools from the highest to the lowest should be 
nurseries of friendly feeling. A school is a mis 
chievous institution if it biases the heart against 
foreign nations. Boys and girls who are contemptu 
ous of people under other flags grow up to be men 
and women who justify war. The conversation of 
society should be kept gracious and sweet. It is in 
social intercourse that the seeds of war are often 
sown. The unguarded tongue can keep fires burn 
ing in the heart which may one day burst into a 
world conflagration. The Christian pulpit must 
build up in Christian people the international mind. 
It must so emphasize international obligations that 
men shall have an international conscience. If we 
are to make disciples of the nations, then we ought 
to think of them often, and consider ways of draw- 



THE MISSION OF THE CHURCH 85 

ing them closer to us. A Christian Church is not 
worthy of its name if it is not a fountain of friendly 
feeling. The Church exists to extend the sway of 
love over all the earth, and to this great work every 
congregation should make its contribution. The 
world's atmosphere should be made fragrant by the 
friendly sentiments expressed by Christian people. 
u Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be 
called the sons of God." Every one of us can win 
that title. 

The supreme mission of the Church in the twen 
tieth century is to create a warless world. We must 
make war unthinkable. Three of our Presidents 
have publicly declared that war between Great 
Britain and the United States is unthinkable. That 
cannot be said too often. We should form the 
habit of saying it. All the people should be edu 
cated to say it. The English-speaking peoples will 
fight one another no more. Let that resolution be 
written in the book of life ! 

If war between the United States and Britain is 
unthinkable, then preparations for an American- 
British war must also be unthinkable. Why pre 
pare for a war which the mind is not allowed to 
entertain? If it is a crime against humanity for 
these two nations to fight, it is also a crime for them 
to squander their money on the implements of 
slaughter. Nations are stewards of the gold that 
is given them. For every dollar of it they must 
render an account. How can Britain and America 
hope to escape the condemnation of Gehenna if 
with their great cities in their present deplorable 
condition, they squander their resources on prepara 
tions for a war which sensible men have declared 
to be unthinkable? A powerful group of militarists 
is everlastingly at work in both countries eager to 



86 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

build up the military and naval establishments be 
yond all rational dimensions. By their incessant 
chatter about the "next war" they ^keep the old 
fears alive, and give all the old suspicions a sharper 
edge. It is the duty of the Church to watch these 
men to expose them to rebuke them. They are 
among the arch-mischief-makers of our time. The 
Church must keep its eye on all jingoes no matter 
where they are to be found, whether in the House 
or in the Senate, or in the newspaner office. Jingo 
ism is a disease, a perniciou^ an ! graded form of 
patriotism. Journalists who in their papers habitu 
ally jab at ft reign nations, and by^their idle gossip 
and poisoned rumors darken the mind and embitter 
the heart should be abhorred and feared. ^ Politi 
cians in high places who speak of sister^ nations in 
terms of insolence and insult should receive the hot 
condemnation of all who love mankind. No man 
is fit to hold political office in the United States who 
cannot speak respectfully of every foreign nation, 
and who does not breathe in all his public utterances 
the spirit of international good will. It is the 
work of the Church to create a public opinion so 
discriminating and powerful that any reckless rep 
robates who may own newspapers or hold office 
shall find themselves impotent to work harm. 

The Christian Church is working constantly in 
the interest of international understanding and con 
cord. Even when its leaders are recreant or dumb, 
it goes on drawing the nations closer together. It 
is impossible for Britain and America to drift per 
manently apart, for the reason that the Church of 
Christ is potent in both countries. British and 
American Christians are numbered by the scores of 
millions and these great masses of human life are 
always pulling the two nations together. In all 



THE MISSION OF THE CHURCH 87 

British and American churches, the Lord's Prayer is 
repeated a prayer that breathes the spirit of fel 
lowship and forgiveness. j^When we pray we are 
always together. And when we sing, we are still 
together. Britons sing the hymns of American 
poets and we sing the hymns of British poets. In 
the hymn books the two nations are indissolubly 
united. When we read the Bible, we are side by 
side. It is always reminding us that we have one 
Father and that we are. all brethren. It is always 
pleading with .*. ''to pat away all bitterness and 
wrath, and anger and clamor and evil^speaking and 
malice, and to be kind one to another, tender 
hearted, forgiving one another, even as God for 
Christ's sake has forgiven us." When we celebrate 
the Lord's Supper, we are in the presence of One 
who is Master of us all. When we listen to the 
preacher, he is always asking us to look to Jesus. 
Every British preacher exhorts his hearers to fol 
low Jesus. Every American preacher does the 
same. Here is an amazing thing. The proud 
Briton, rich in the possession of a long line of Brit 
ish sages and heroes and martyrs and saints, turns 
away from this great company of the immortal, 
and urges all Britons to keep their eyes upon Jesus. 
The American also proud of his country and its 
mighty men turns his back on them all, and begs his 
hearers to look only to Jesus. The Union Jack and 
the Stars and Stripes are glorious flags, but there is 
a flag above both of them, the banner of the cross. 
Under that banner millions of Britons and Ameri 
cans are gathered. American's and Britons iare 
ardent patriots, but tfiey know that patriotism is 
not enough. In their great hours they rise above 
all forms of nationalism, and sit down in the king 
dom of righteousness and peace and joy. Their 



88 THE FRIENDSHIP INDISPENSABLE 

citizenship, is in heaven. All Christians believe in 
the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is the spirit of 
love. Possessing this spirit, they are not surprised 
or frightened by superficial differences or temporary 
estrangements. "There are diversities of gifts, but 
the same spirit. There are differences of adminis 
trations, but the same Lord. There are diversities 
of operations, but it is the same God who worketh 
all in all."- -Christians know that there is u one body 
and one spirit, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, 
one God and Father of all who is above all, and 
through all and in all." Confident that nations live 
and move and have their being in God, and that 
God is love, we are sure that the future is safe. If 
love is in us all and over us all, then love will ulti 
mately conquer. Our friendship is a growing one, 
and nothing shall be able to separate us. We shall 
have in the future as in the past our differences of 
viewpoint, our clashes of opinion, our divergent 
judgments, our occasional outbursts of ugly temper, 
but all these are transient and only bubbles *on the 
surface. Our hearts are intertwined. Our minds 
are interlaced. Our lives are merged and blended. 
Our ideals are the same. Our purposes and hopes 
are one. We are working for the sway of love. 
We trust all to love. We know that "Love bears 
all things, believes all things, hopes all things, 
endures all things. Love never fails." 



Si 



110559