Skip to main content

Full text of "The future of Illinois basin coal : 1994 and beyond"

See other formats


IMN97 

e.3 


CUi^^J 


The  Future  of  Illinois  Basin  Coal 

1 994  and  Beyond 


Subhash  B.  Bhagwat 


NOV  0  5  1987 

UL  STATE 


Department  of  Energy  and  Natural  Resources 
ILLINOIS  STATE  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 


ILLINOIS  MINERAL  NOTES  97 

1987 


Editor:  Andrea  Van  Proyen 
Graphic  Artist:  John  L.  Moss 


Bhagwat,  Subhash  B. 

The  future  of  Illinois  Basin  coal :  1 994  and  beyond  /  Subhash  B. 
Bhagwat.  —  Champaign,  IL  :  Illinois  State  Geological  Survey 
1987. 

26  p.  ;  28  cm.  —  (Illinois  Mineral  Notes  ;  97) 

1 .  Coal  —  Illinois  Basin  —  Economic  aspects.    2.  Coal  trade  —  Il- 
linois Basin.     I.  Title.     II.  Series. 


Printed  by  authority  of  the  State  of  Illinois/1987/1000 


ILLINOIS  STATE  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 


3  3051  00005  9687 


The  Future  of  Illinois  Basin  Coal: 

1 994  and  Beyond 

Subhash  B.  Bhagwat 


LI&tfAK* 


NOV  0  5  1987 

III  STAR  fiEBUgfSJi  ft 


ILLINOIS  STATE  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 
Morris  W.  Leighton,  Chief 
Natural  Resources  Building 
615  East  Peabody  Drive 
Champaign,  Illinois    61820 

ILLINOIS  MINERAL  NOTES  97 
1987 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2012  with  funding  from 

University  of  Illinois  Urbana-Champaign 


http://archive.org/details/futureofillinois97bhag 


CONTENTS 


ABSTRACT        v 

INTRODUCTION        1 

THE  CLEAN  AIR  ACT         1 

THE  LAST  QUARTER-CENTURY  OF  U.S.  COAL  PRODUCTION        3 

MARKETS  FOR  ILLINOIS  BASIN  COAL,  1975-1985        3 

Utility  Markets        3 

State-by-state  breakdown  of  utility  market  shares        5 

Impact  of  western  coals  on  Illinois  Basin  utility  markets        8 
Non-utility  Markets        12 
Cost  Competitiveness        13 
Conclusions  from  1975-1985  Market  Analysis        15 

MARKETS  FOR  ILLINOIS  BASIN  COAL,  1994  AND  BEYOND        16 

Scenario  1 :  Continued  Application  of  Current  Regulations        16 
Scenario  2:  Acid  Rain  Legislation  Requiring  Further  S02  Reduction        20 

REFERENCES         26 

FIGURES 

1  Trends  in  U.S.  and  Illinois  Basin  coal  production,  1930-1986        4 

2  Shipments  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  to  electric  utilities,  1 975-1 985        5 

3  Districts  in  the  U.S.  that  produce  bituminous  and  subbituminous  coal  and  lignite        1 0 

4  1985  railroad  freight  rates  for  coal        15 

5  Forced  outage  rate  of  coal-fired  steam  units        23 

6  Age  and  megawatt  capability  of  coal-fired  steam  units        23 

TABLES 

1  Shipments  of  Illinois  coal  to  utilities  by  state        6 

2  Shipments  of  Indiana  coal  to  utilities  by  state        6 

3  Shipments  of  western  Kentucky  coal  to  utilities  by  state        7 

4  Total  1 975  and  1 985  utility  markets  and  shares  held  by  Illinois  Basin  states        9 

5  Western  coals  sold  to  utility  markets  of  Illinois  Basin  coal,  1 975  and  1 985        1 1 

6  Shipments  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  to  non-utility  markets,  1 975  and  1 985        1 2 

7  FOB  mine  price  and  labor  productivity  for  major  coal-producing  states,  1984        14 

8  Average  delivered  cost  of  coal  supplied  to  electric  utilities,  1985        14 

9  Coal-burning  electric  utilities  that  started  operation  from  1 981  -1 985  in  Illinois  Basin 
market  states        17 

1 0  New  coal-burning  electric  capacity  expected  to  come  on  line  by  1 994  in  Illinois  Basin 
market  states        20 

1 1  FGD  capacities  and  sulfur  contents  of  coal  in  utility  plants  planned  in  the  Illinois  Basin 
coal  market  states        20 

1 2  Sulfur  dioxide  reduction  targets  as  per  proposed  1 986  acid  rain  bill        22 

1 3  Btu/lb  and  percentage  sulfur  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  received  by  utilities,  1 975        25 

1 4  Btu/lb  and  percentage  sulfur  of  Illinois  coal  received  by  utilities,  1 984        25 

1 5  Projected  markets  for  Illinois  Basin  coal  in  1 994  and  2000  if  acid  rain 
legislation  enacted        26 


ABSTRACT 

Since  the  Clean  Air  Act  was  implemented  in  1971,  production  of 
high-sulfur  Illinois  Basin  coal  has  stagnated,  while  total  U.S. 
coal  production  has  continued  to  increase.   Illinois  Basin  coal 
production  figures  for  the  years  1975  through  1985  show  that  low- 
sulfur  western  coals  have  successfully  captured  newly  developing 
coal  markets  that  traditionally  would  have  been  Illinois  Basin 
coal  markets,  despite  revisions  in  the  Clean  Air  Act  aimed  at 
reducing  the  disadvantage  of  high-sulfur  coals  in  the  market- 
place. The  continuing  weak  position  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  is 
attributed  to  a  lack  of  cost  competitiveness.   It  is  predicted 
that  Illinois  Basin  coal  production  will  continue  to  lag  through 
1994  and  beyond  if  current  clean  air  regulations  are  enforced  and 
the  price  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  does  not  become  competitive.  If 
acid  rain  legislation  is  enacted,  production  of  Illinois  Basin 
coal  will  undoubtedly  decrease,  resulting  in  the  loss  of  thousands 
of  mining  jobs. 


ISGS 


IMN97 


INTRODUCTION 

By  1994,  the  most  stringent  clean  air  standards  in  U.S.  history 
could  go  into  effect.  This  legislation  could  further  reduce  the 
markets  for  Illinois  Basin  coal,  already  seriously  eroded.  The 
Illinois  Basin,  which  covers  a  large  part  of  Illinois  and  extends 
into  southwestern  Indiana  and  western  Kentucky,  has  extensive 
reserves  of  bituminous  coal;  however,  because  of  the  coal  s  high 
sulfur  content,  production  has  been  virtually  stagnant  since 
implementation  of  the  Clean  Air  Act  in  1970,  even  after  later 
revisions  to  the  act  aimed  at  improving  the  market  for  high-sulfur 
coals.  Total  U.S.  coal  production  has  continued  to  increase  in 
the  same  time  period. 

This  paper  analyzes  the  utility  and  non-utility  markets  for 
Illinois  Basin  coal  for  1975  through  1985  and  projects  Illinois 
Basin  coal  production  under  two  different  scenarios:  (1)  continued 
enforcement  of  current  legislation  and  (2)  enactment  of  acid  rain 
legislation.  Background  information  is  provided  on  the  Clean  Air 
Act  and  on  U.S.  coal  production. 


THE  CLEAN  AIR  ACT 

Although  the  Clean  Air  Act  was  passed  in  1963,  it  was  not  until 
1970  that  the  federal  government  empowered  the  U.S.  Environmental 
Protection  Agency  (USEPA)  to  set  uniform  air  quality  standards. 
Under  the  act,  the  USEPA  has  set  National  Ambient  Air  Quality 
Standards  (NAAQS)  for  ambient  pollutant  concentrations  for  seven 
of  the  most  common  and  widespread  pollutants:  sulfur  dioxide 
(S02),  nitrogen  oxides  (NOx),  particulate  matter,  lead,  carbon 
dioxide,  hydrocarbons,  and  ozone.  The  Clean  Air  Act  limits  the 
amount  of  S02  ,  NOx,  and  particulates  that  may  be  emitted  by  coal- 
fired  boilers. 

For  enforcement  purposes,  the  United  States  was  divided  into  274 
air  quality  control  regions.  Each  region  has  to  meet  the  limits 
imposed  by  the  NAAQS.  Control  regions  within  state  boundaries 
where  the  ambient  pollutant  concentrations  are  below  or  meet  the 
NAAQS  are  designated  as  attainment  areas.  Areas  where  the  ambient 
pollutant  concentrations  are  above  the  NAAQS  are  designated  as 
nonattainment  areas.  In  nonattainment  areas,  the  states  are 
required  to  devise  a  strategy  to  ensure  that  the  minimum  standards 
set  by  the  USEPA  are  met  and  maintained.  This  strategy  is 
incorporated  into  State  Implementation  Plans,  or  SIPs.  New  and 
modified  pollution  sources  within  nonattainment  areas  are   required 
to  meet  the  lowest  achievable  emission  regardless  of  cost. 

For  plants  built  prior  to  1971,  S02  emissions  are  to  be  gradually 
lowered  via  the  SIPs,  with  the  ultimate  goal  of  bringing  their 
emissions  down  to  meet  the  NAAQS.  The  time  for  achieving  this 
objective  was  not  fixed.  However,  the  SIPs  were  subject  to 
approval  by  the  USEPA.  In  the  early  1980s,  the  SIPs  were  revised, 


ISGS  1  ,MN97 


and  although  they  still  permit  relatively  high  levels  of  S02  emis- 
sions from  some  plants,  there  is  general  consensus  among  the 
states  that  plants  built  prior  to  1971  should  not  emit  over  2.0 
pounds  per  million  British  thermal  units  (106  Btu)  of  heat  input. 

The  1971  New  Source  Performance  Standards  (NSPS)  issued  by  the 
USEPA  required  that  utility  coal -fired  boilers  of  73-megawatt  (MW) 
output  or  greater,  on  which  construction  or  modification  had  begun 
after  August  17,  1971,  could  not  emit  more  than  1.2  lbs  S02/106 
Btu.  Plant  operators  were  required  to  use  "continuous  emission 
monitoring"  to  measure  the  S02  emission  levels  in  the  flue  gas 
outlets  of  coal-fired  boilers.  If  the  average  emission  level 
exceeded  that  specified  by  the  NSPS  for  more  than  3  hours,  the 
plant  could  be  cited  for  violation. 

In  1977,  the  Clean  Air  Act  was  amended  to  require  that  states  set 
limits  on  the  existing  pollution  sources  within  nonattainment 
areas.  It  was  specified  that  such  sources  must  use  "reasonably 
available  pollution  control  technologies"  (RACT).  Both 
technological  and  economic  feasibility  are  considered  when 
applying  RACT  to  existing  sources.  In  attainment  areas,  new  and 
modified  pollution  sources  are  regulated  to  "prevent  significant 
deterioration"  (PSD)  of  the  clean  air  within  the  control  region. 
These  sources  are  required  to  use  the  "best  available  control 
technology"  (BACT).  BACT  is  an  emission  limitation  based  on  the 
maximum  degree  of  reduction  that  can  be  achieved  when  energy, 
environmental,  and  other  costs  are  considered. 

In  1979,  the  USEPA  issued  the  Revised  New  Source  Performance 
Standards  (RNSPS).  These  standards  are  more  stringent  than  the 
NSPS  and  apply  to  all  coal-fired  utility  plants  capable  of 
producing  more  than  73  MW  of  generating  capacity  and  on  which 
construction  or  modification  began  after  September  18,  1978. 

The  RNSPS  retain  the  1971  NSPS  standard  of  1.2  lbs  S02/106  Btu  of 
heat  input  as  a  ceiling  for  emissions,  but  additionally  requires 
that  S02  emissions  from  all  new  or  modified  (post-1978)  boilers  be 
reduced  on  a  sliding  scale  of  percentages  that  considers  the 
different  sulfur  contents  of  U.S.  coals.  All  coals  burned  must 
have  at  least  90  percent  of  the  S02  removed  from  their  emissions, 
unless  90-percent  removal  reduces  emissions  to  less  than  0.6 
lbs/106  Btu.  If  emissions  go  below  that  level,  reductions  between 
70  and  90  percent  are  permitted,  depending  on  the  sulfur  content 
of  the  coal.  Utilities  are  required  to  monitor  S02  emissions 
continuously,  both  at  the  flue  gas  inlet  and  at  the  outlet  of 
these  new  sources,  to  determine  whether  the  required  removal  is 
attained  on  a  24-hour  rolling  average.  The  RNSPS  regulations 
require  the  use  of  some  form  of  flue-gas  desulfurization  (FGD) 
unit,  or  scrubber,  for  all  new  or  modified  utility  boilers,  since 
only  scrubbers  can  reduce  emissions  by  more  than  70  percent. (1) 


IMN97 


ISGS 


THE  LAST  QUARTER-CENTURY  OF  U.S.  COAL  PRODUCTION 

Since  1961,  the  U.S.  coal -mining  industry  has  grown  an  average  of 
3  3  percent  per  year,  although  there  have  been  significant  year- 
to-year  fluctuations  (fig.  1).  Total  U.S.  coal  production  in- 
creased from  about  410  million  tons  in  1961,  to  660  million  tons 
in  1975,  to  an  estimated  900  million  tons  in  1986.  Coal  exports 
to  other  countries  accounted  for  8.5  percent  of  U.S.  production  in 
1960,  7.6  percent  in  1975,  and  is  estimated  at  10  percent  for 
1985. 

Low-sulfur  western  coals  have  accounted  for  an  increasing  percent- 
age of  total  U.S.  coal  production  the  last  10  years,  due  to  both 
increased  demand  for  electricity  in  the  western  states  and  the 
implementation  of  clean  air  regulations  throughout  the  U.S.  In 
1975,  about  15.5  percent  (100  million  tons)  of  U.S.  coal  came  from 
the  western  coal  basin  states.  By  1985,  western  coal  basin  states 
accounted  for  30.5  percent  (270  million  tons)  of  U.S.  coal  produc- 
tion. In  the  same  10-year  period,  coal  production  in  the  rest  of 
the  U.S.  increased  by  only  13  percent  (70  million  tons). 

None  of  this  13  percent  increase  in  non-western  coal  production 
came  from  the  Illinois  Basin.  From  1975  through  1985,  coal  pro- 
duction in  the  Illinois  Basin  stagnated  at  between  120  and  140 
million  tons  (except  for  1978  and  1981,  which  were  strike  years). 

MARKETS  FOR  ILLINOIS  BASIN  COAL,  1975-1985 

The  most  important  market  for  Illinois  Basin  coal  is  electric 
utilities.  From  1975  through  1985,  about  89  percent  of  Illinois 
Basin  coal  was  shipped  to  electric  utilities.  The  remaining  11 
percent  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  is  used  by  coke  and  gas  plants  and 
small  industrial  users  that  generate  steam  (see  section  "Non- 
utility  Markets"). 

Utility  Markets 

Figure  2  shows  total  sales  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  to  utilities 
from  1975  through  1985,  with  estimates  for  sales  for  1986.  As  one 
can  see,  there  have  been  fluctuations  in  total  sales  to  utilities 
during  this  period.  Data  on  shipments  for  1978,  1979,  1981,  1982, 
1984,  and  1985  were  adjusted  to  account  for  the  effect  on  sales  of 
the  mine  worker  strikes  in  1978  and  1981  and  the  threat  of  a 
strike  in  1984.  Stocks  are  depleted  in  strike  years  and  they  must 
be  replenished  in  the  years  following  the  strikes.  It  is,  there- 
fore, appropriate  to  average  the  sales  for  these  years.  Adjusted 
sales  figures  are  represented  by  a  star  in  figure  2. 

When  shipments  are  averaged  for  these  strike-affected  years,  sales 
of  Illinois  Basin  coal  to  utilities  show  a  declining  trend  from 
1975  through  1983.  From  1984  through  1986,  sales  appear  to  have 
recovered.  However,  it  is  inappropriate  to  conclude  that  the 
decline  in  sales  has  been  reversed  from  just  three  years  of  data. 


ISGS  3  IMN97 


900  -i 


1938           1944 
|-  + 10.0%-| 2  6% 

Rapid        Great  Fluctuations 
Growth 

World  War  II     General  Decline 
in  Production 


1961 


1986 


+  3.3% 


Sustained  Average  Growth 


United  States 


1938            1944                         1954 
f-  +  7.91%H 4.75% -\— 

Rapid      Shrinkage 
Growth 

World  War  II 


+  3.6%- 


1972 


1986 


Sustained 
Average  Growth 


Stagnation 


Year 

Figure  1     Trends  in  U.S.  and  Illinois  Basin  coal  production,  1930-1986  (data  adapted  from  U.S. 
Dept.  of  Energy,  Bituminous  Coal  and  Lignite  Distribution). 


IMN97 


ISGS 


130- 


120- 


C 

o 

c    110- 

o 


100- 


90 


•  ^* 


•  • 


•  • 


1975 


I 

76 

I 

77 

I 

78 

I 

79 

1        1 

80      81 

Year 

I 

82 

I 

83 

1 

84 

1 
85 

86 


Figure  2  Shipments  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  to  electric  utilities,  1 975-1 985  (data  adapted  from  Bitumin- 
ous Coal  and  Lignite  Distribution  1 975,  U.S.  Dept.  of  the  Interior,  Bureau  of  Mines  and  Coal  Distribution 
Jan-Dec  1985,  DOE/EIA-0125(85/4Q).  Sales  figures  that  were  averaged  to  reflect  effect  of  strike 
years  are  represented  by  a  "fc  . 

State-by-state  breakdown  of  utility  market  shares.  Tables  1,  2, 
and  3  show  the  dependence  of  Illinois,  Indiana,  and  western 
Kentucky  coal  producers,  respectively,  on  demand  from  utilities  in 
states  in  their  market  areas.  In  1985,  the  total  market  area  for 
Illinois  Basin  coal  extended  into  17  states,  compared  with  14 
states  in  1975.  The  largest  single  market  for  any  state  remained 
within  its  own  boundaries,  although  the  percentage  of  coal  con- 
sumed by  utilities  within  the  state  declined  from  45  to  31  for 
Illinois  and  from  80  to  72  for  Indiana.  In-state  consumption  of 
western  Kentucky  coal  increased  to  35  percent  of  total  sales  to 
utilities  in  1985,  as  compared  with  about  31  percent  in  1975. 

Illinois'  shipments  to  utilities  in  states  immediately  north  and 
west  of  Illinois  declined  due  to  competition  from  low-sulfur 
western  and  eastern  coals,  but  the  decline  was  more  than  offset  by 
increases  in  shipments  to  utilities  in  Missouri,  Georgia,  Florida, 
Tennessee,  Alabama,  and  Indiana. 

There  are  several  reasons  Illinois  coal  producers  increased  sales 
to  these  states: 

•  Illinois  coal  is  easily  transported  to  these  states  via 
the  waterways  and  railroads.  This  keeps  transportation 
costs  for  Illinois  coal  lower  than  for  coals  from  western 
states,  thus  lowering  delivered  prices. 

•  The  cost  of  mining  coal  in  Illinois  is  lower  than  in  the 
Appalachian  Basin  states.  Georgia,  Florida,  Tennessee, 


ISGS 


IMN97 


Table  1.     Shipments  of   Illinois  coal   to  utilities  by  state 


1975 

1985 

(million  tons) 

(percent) 

(mil  lion  tons) 

(percent) 

Alabama 
Florida 
Georgia 
11 1 inois 

0.389 
** 

0.987 
22.006 

0.8 
** 

2.0 
44.9 

2.819 

3.723 

3.131 

16.541 

5.3 

7.0 

5.9 

31.3 

Indiana 
Iowa 
Kansas 
Kentucky 

3.081 
2.290 

1.982 

6.3 
4.7 

4.0 

7.653 
1.959 
0.481 
0.117 

14.5 
3.7 
0.9 
0.2 

Michigan 
Minnesota 
Mississippi 
Missouri 

0.334 

1.399 

0.924 

10.496 

0.7 

2.9 

1.9 

21.4 

0.027 

0.242 

0.149 

13.419 

0.5 

0.3 

25.4 

Tennessee 
Wisconsin 

0.521 
4.595 

1.1 
9.4 

1.389 
1.248 

2.6 

2.4 

49.004 

100.1* 

52.898 

100.0 

*  Does   not  total    100%  due  to  rounding. 
**   Included  in  Georgia. 

Sources:      Bituminous  Coal   and  Lignite  Distribution  1975,   U.S. 
Dept.   of  the   Interior,   Bureau  of  Mines   and  Coal    Distribution 
Jan-Dec   1985,   DOE/EIA-0125(85/4Q) . 


Table  2.     Shipments  of   Indiana  coal   to  utilities  by  state 


1975 

1985 

(million  tons) 

(percent) 

(million  tons) 

(percent) 

Alabama 

0.025 

0.1 

.. 

Georgia 

0.482 

2.2 

1.301 

4.8 

11 1  inois 

0.371 

1.7 

1.310 

4.9 

Indiana 

17.222 

79.8 

19.413 

71.8 

Iowa 

— 

0.378 

1.4 

Kentucky 

1.689 

7.8 

2.487 

9.2 

Michigan 

0.092 

0.4 

0.098 

0.4 

Minnesota 

-- 

-- 

0.148 

0.6 

Missouri 

0.390 

1.8 

__ 

Ohio 

0.045 

0.2 

0.028 

0.1 

Tennessee 

0.449 

2.1 

0.208 

0.8 

Wisconsin 

-.816 

3.8 

1.661 

6.1 

21.581 

99.9* 

27.032 

100.1* 

Does   not   total    100%  due  to   rounding. 

Sources:      Bituminous  Coal   and  Lignite  Distribution  1975,   U.S. 
Dept.  of  the   Interior,   Bureau   of  Mines   and  Coal    Distribution 
Jan-Dec   1985,   D0E/E I A-0125( 85/4Q) . 


IMN97 


ISGS 


Table  3.     Shipments  of  western  Kentucky  coal   to  utilities  by  state 


1975 

1985 

(million  tons) 

(percent) 

(million  tons)    ( 

percent) 

Al abama 

6.459 

12.1 

0.981 

2.7 

Arkansas 

— 

— 

0.014 

-- 

Florida 

4.102 

7.7 

4.444 

12.1 

Georgia 

3.783 

7.1 

2.230 

6.1 

11 1  inois 

0.844 

1.6 

1.116 

3.0 

Indiana 

4.159 

7.8 

2.853 

7.8 

Iowa 

0.064 

0.1 

0.051 

0.1 

Kentucky 

16.587 

31.0 

12.929 

35.2 

Michigan 

1.058 

2.0 

0.101 

0.3 

Minnesota 

0.101 

0.2 

0.059 

0.2 

Mississippi 

0.467 

0.9 

0.188 

0.5 

Missouri 

0.372 

0.7 

0.006 

-- 

Ohio 

1.896 

3.5 

1.605 

4.4 

Pennsylvania 

-- 

— 

0.056 

0.2 

Tennessee 

11.475 

21.5 

8.020 

21.9 

Wisconsin 

2.070 

3.9 

2.043 

5.6 

53.437 

100.1* 

36.696 

100.1* 

*  Totals  may  not  add  to   100  percent  due  to  individual    rounding 

Sources:      Bituminous  Coal   and  Lignite  Distribution   1975,   U.S. 
Dept.   of  the   Interior,   Bureau  of  Mines   and  Coal    Distribution 
Jan-Dec   1985,   D0E/EIA-0125(85/4Q) . 


Alabama,  and  Indiana  received  the  majority  of  their  coal 
from  the  Appalachian  Basin  States. 

•  Some  utilities  in  these  states  converted  from  oil  and/or 
gas  to  coal.  This  conversion  was  partly  a  result  of  the 
1978  Fuel  Use  Act  and  partly  due  to  the  1979-80  oil  price 
increases.  It  led  to  increased  total  coal  demand  and  an 
increase  in  demand  for  Illinois  Basin  coal,  which 
benefited  Illinois  coal. 

•  About  half  of  U.S.  FGD  capacity  (=  25,000  MW)  is  installed 
in  the  market  states  for  Illinois  Basin  coal.  An  esti- 
mated 20  to  25  percent  of  this  capacity  is  installed  on 
plants  built  prior  to  1971,  while  the  remaining  is  on 
plants  built  in  the  1975-1985  period.  Illinois  coal  could 
take  advantage  of  the  demand  stabilization  resulting  from 
FGD  installations  because  of  its  relative  cost  advantage. 

Indiana  also  increased  its  shipments  to  utilities  by  about  5.5 
million  tons  from  1975  through  1985.  However,  Indiana  coal  has 
been  more  successfully  marketed  in  its  adjoining  states,  such  as 
Illinois  and  Kentucky,  and  states  in  close  proximity,  such  as 
Wisconsin,  than  in  distant  states  such  as  Georgia.  One  of  the 
reasons  for  the  increase  may  be  the  decrease  in  average  sulfur 
content  of  Indiana  coal  from  3.12  percent  in  1975  to  2.54  percent 


ISGS  7  IMN97 


in  1985;  it  may  also  have  been  the  result  of  lower  prices  due  to 
lower  transportation  costs  and  of  marketing  strategy. 

In  1985,  Illinois  Basin  coal  shipments  from  western  Kentucky  to 
electric  utilities  totaled  about  37  million  tons,  nearly  17  mil- 
lion tons  less  than  in  1975.   In  this  same  time  period,  western 
Kentucky  coal  producers  also  became  much  more  dependent  on  utili- 
ties in  Florida,  although  their  tonnage  shipments  to  Florida  did 
not  increase  significantly.  In  a  smaller  total  1985  market, 
western  Kentucky  coal  producers  lost  sales  in  Alabama,  Kentucky, 
Tennessee,  and  Mississippi  to  coal  producers  from  Illinois  and 
eastern  Kentucky.  The  majority  of  those  sales  were  lost  in 
Alabama. 

From  1975  to  1985,  the  total  demand  for  coal  by  electric  utilities 
in  the  17-state  Illinois  Basin  market  area  increased  from  about 
306  to  373  million  tons  (table  4).  Table  4  data  indicate  that 
Illinois  has  increased  its  market  shares  in  southern  states  and 
lost  shares  in  northern  states.  These  states  are  the  same  to 
which  shipments  in  absolute  tons  also  increased  or  decreased 
(table  1).  Illinois  coal  thus  has  taken  advantage  of  opportuni- 
ties in  the  southern  markets  but  lost  a  significant  share  of  the 
northern  markets.  Similarly,  Indiana  has  increased  its  shares  of 
the  utility  coal  markets  in  Illinois,  Kentucky,  and  Wisconsin  in 
absolute  as  well  as  relative  terms.  Western  Kentucky,  on  the 
other  hand,  has  lost  market  shares  in  nearly  all  the  states  in 
1985  compared  with  1975. 

From  1975  through  1985,  total  coal  shipments  to  utilities  from  the 
Illinois  Basin  declined  from  124  million  tons  to  117  million  tons 
(tables  1,  2,  3)  and  the  market  share  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  in 
the  17-state  market  area  declined  from  41  percent  in  1975  to  31 
percent  in  1985  (table  4).  The  data  indicate  a  shift  in  strength 
within  the  Illinois  Basin  in  favor  of  Illinois  and  Indiana  coal  at 
the  expense  of  western  Kentucky  coal.  From  1975  to  1985, 
Illinois'  and  Indiana's  share  of  total  shipments  to  utilities 
increased  from  57  percent  to  68  percent.  The  production  curves  in 
figure  2  confirm  this  shift. 

Impact  of  western  coals  on  Illinois  Basin  utility  markets. 

Increased  demand  for  low-sulfur  western  coals  has  eaten  into  the 
utility  markets  for  Illinois  Basin  coals.  Western  coals  are  those 
produced  in  districts  16-20,  22,  and  23  as  defined  in  the  Bitumi- 
nous Coal  Act  of  1937  and  its  amendments  (fig.  3).  Of  these  seven 
districts,  mines  in  district  18  (Arizona,  California  and  most  of 
New  Mexico)  and  district  23  (Washington  and  Alaska)  did  not  ship 
any  coal  to  the  Illinois  Basin  coal  markets.  Districts  18  and  23 
have,  therefore,  been  excluded  from  table  5,  which  shows  shipments 
from  western  coal  districts  to  states  served  by  Illinois  Basin 
coal.  As  table  5  indicates,  in  both  1975  and  1985,  only  coal 


IMN97 


ISGS 


producers  from  districts  19  and  22  shipped  significant  amounts  of 
coal  to  the  Illinois  Basin  coal  market  states.  These  districts 
represent  mainly  Wyoming  and  Montana  coals.  In  1985,  Colorado 
coals  from  district  16  also  figure  significantly  in  the  statis- 
tics, while  districts  17  and  20  disappear  as  exporters  to  the 
Illinois  Basin  market  states. 

In  1975,  coal  shipments  from  western  states  to  utilities  in  the  14 
states  in  the  Illinois  Basin  market  area  totaled  about  32  million 
tons.  When,  by  1985,  the  Illinois  Basin  market  area  had  grown  to 
17  states,  shipments  of  western  coals  to  these  states  totaled  8? 
million  tons.  Western  coals'  share  of  total  utility  coal  demand 
in  the  17-state  area  increased  from  about  11  percent  in  1975  to  22 
percent  in  1985.  About  74  percent  of  the  total  increased  coal 
demand  by  utilities  in  the  Illinois  Basin  coal  market  area  was  met 
by  western  states. 

As  table  5  indicates,  most  western  coals  were  exported  to  northern 
and  midwestern  states:  Minnesota,  Wisconsin,  Michigan,  Iowa, 


Table  4.  Total  1975  and  1985  utility  markets  and  shares  held  by  Illinois  Basin  states 


Total  Market     Illinois  Share   Indiana  Share   W.  Kentucky  Share 
(million  tons)        (%)  (%)  (%) 

Market  State    1975     1985     1975    1985     1975    1985     1975    1985 


Alabama 

19.246 

21.525 

2.0 

13.1 

0.1 

— 

33.6 

4.6 

Arkansas 

__ 

11.861 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

0.1 

Florida 

5.451 

16.640 

-- 

22.4 

-- 

-- 

75.3 

26.7 

Georgia 

14.619 

24.201 

6.8 

12.9 

3.3 

5.4 

25.9 

9.2 

Illinois 

34.853 

31.682 

63.3 

52.2 

1.1 

4.1 

2.4 

3.5 

Indiana 

28.715 

36.224 

10.7 

21.1 

60.0 

53.6 

14.5 

7.9 

Iowa 

5.560 

12.345 

41.2 

15.9 

-- 

3.1 

1.1 

0.4 

Kansas 

3.220 

14.088 

— 

3.4 

-- 

■~ 



™  ~ 

Kentucky 

25.724 

23.405 

7.7 

0.5 

6.6 

10.6 

64.5 

55.2 

Michigan 

21.802 

23.005 

1.5 

0.1 

0.4 

0.4 

4.9 

0.4 

Minnesota 

8.782 

11.397 

15.9 

2.1 

-- 

1.3 

1.2 

0.5 

Mississippi 

1.573 

3.873 

58.7 

3.8 

-- 

— 

29.7 

4.9 

Missouri 

17.741 

22.065 

59.2 

60.8 

2.2 

-- 

2.1 

-- 

Ohio 

46.412 

47.861 

-- 

-- 

0.1 

-- 

4.1 

3.4 

Pennsylvania 

35.778 

39.573 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

— 

0.1 

Tennessee 

24.659 

18.178 

2.1 

7.6 

1.8 

1.1 

46.5 

44.1 

Wisconsin 

11.598 

15.357 

39.6 

8.1 

7.0 

10.8 

17.8 

13.3 

305.733 

373.280 

Sources:  Bituminous  Coal  and  Lignite  Distribution  1975,  U.S.  Dept.  of  the  Interior, 
Bureau  of  Mines  and  Coal  Distribution  Jan-Dec  1985,  D0E/E IA-0125( 85/4Q) . 


ISGS  9  IMN97 


c 
g> 

C 

m 

ro 
o 
o 

w 

3 
O 

c 

I 

•^ 

.q 
w 

■D 

C 
(0 

to 

3 

o 

c 

'E 

3 


CD 
O 
3 
TJ 
O 


CO 

0) 

.C 


o 

22 

b 

0) 

w 
3 


IMN97 


10 


ISGS 


LO 
CO 
CTi 


LO 
I — 


4-> 

(!) 


4-> 


o 


LfJ 

a? 
en 


LO 

01 


10 


CO 


oo 


LO 
CO 
CTi 


LO 
CXI 


un 

CO 

cr. 


LO 
CO 

o^ 


to 
oo 


to 

co    i 
•    i 


i     i     i     i 


o  to  oo  on 

«3-  O  r—  evj 

•^-    CTi  LO  i— I 


inoin* 

LO    ^"    r— I    LO 

LO   LO  OO  CM 


■— 1  CM    CM 

o 

^  ^  co 

oo 

LO    LO     >— < 

LO 

co  to 

LO  co 
CM   CM 


LO  O  LO 
LO  CM  00 
«3-   ■*   CM 

moo 


o  ■— i  oo 
p-  <*  oo 

i— I  CM   CM 


■— i  co 

<•   LO 
LO  CM 


o  o  «a- 
p-  oo  <d- 

r-H  o  ^ 


i-H 

1— 1  I— I 

o 

1    CO      1 

CM   CO      1       1 

1    00 

1    O     1 

i— 1  <-H      1       1 

1   t— 1 

cr>  r-»  oo  co 
co  •=*  r~~  cm 

oo  O   LO  t-H 

r-  <*  <T<  CM 


«d-  p-  o  -=3- 
lo  oo  r-  lo 

O  ai  oo  cm 

•     •     •     • 

CM  CM   i— l  i— I 


P^ 
CM 


1    O 


CM    tsl 

p-  co 
«*■  p-    i 

CO  LO      I 

o  o 


I     I     I     I 


CM 

i  oo 
I   1— I 


LO  CM  LO 
O  O  O 
O  «=}-  o 


o 


o 

00 

LO 


LO    I — 
O  CM 

o  <y> 


*NO 

.—1  .— 1 

CO    LO 

.— 1   O   LO      1 

1    CO   O       1 

1     LO   o 

O  O  •— i     1 

1    o  ■— '      1 

1    O  o 

00 


I — 

LO 
LO 

CO 


LO 

CO 

I       I     CM 


LO 


o 

I     CM 


I       I       I        I 


Q. 

c 

TO 

a. 

ro  a> 

c 

to 

to 

>,   C    .(_> 

•i— 

•r- 

>  <u 

■1— 

to 

to 

TO 

TO 

•  r- 

TO 

-^    TO    O 

to 

i_ 

I —    to 

to 

E 

CO 

T3 

>,— 

o 

C 

tO 

U    Oll/I 

to 

^ 

>>  </> 

c: 

to 

c 

CD 

c 

TO 

TO 

3  ■!-  cu 

•I— 

o 

to    CU 

O 

.a 

TO 

t_ 

t_ 

•1— 

•f— 

TO 

LO 

+->  -C    c 

1/1 

to 

o 

c  c 

U 

03 

j*: 

o 

o 

1 — 

■a 

2 

C 

c   U  c 

L0 

to 

•i— 

c   c 

00 

, 

(_ 

, — 

ai 

r— 

c 

o 

TO 

<U   -r-   -r- 

•I — 

•i— 

-C 

a>  cu 

■1 — 

=t 

< 

Lj_ 

CJ3 

<—> 

l-H 

^ 

VE2 

s: 

s: 

o 

O-   h- 

3 

TO 
O 


TO 

CU 

l_ 

CO 


cu 


CU 
Q 


CM 

o 


Q 

cu 


o 


T3 

C 
TO 


3 

.. — * 

-O.  o- 

•  r— 

<* 

1_ 

~^ 

+-> 

LO 

</) 

CO 

>l — 

1 

O 

LO 

CM 

CU 

i — i 

+J 

o 

1 

c 

<c 

CJi 

•  r— 

LU 

_J 

~\ 

UJ 

-o  c 

c 

Q 

TO 

, 

LO 

TO 

CO 

O 

CTi 

C_J 

I-H 

LO 

o 

3 

cu 

O  O 

C 

1 

o 

to 

3  >"3 

z: 

•  r— 

■4-J 

Q 

■i-     C 

en 

CO    o 

cz 

to 

•f— 

•(— 

<U 

■!-> 

T3 

T3 

•  •    3 

3 

3 

LO  X5 

i — 

r— 

QJ  -i- 

O 

(_) 

O    t- 

X 

c 

t-   4-> 

UJ 

>—' 

3    to 

O  f- 

CM 

tO  Q 

ISGS 


11 


IMN97 


Illinois,  and  Indiana.  Western  coal  producers  also  captured  the 
major  new  utility  markets  that  developed  when  Arkansas  and  Kansas 
experienced  economic  growth  and  when  utilities  in  those  states 
switched  to  coal.  Even  in  Missouri  (a  state  in  which  Illinois 
Basin  coal  has  been  sold  in  increasing  quantities  in  the  last  10 
years),  western  coal  producers'  share  of  the  utility  market  in- 
creased from  5.6  percent  in  1975  to  26  percent  in  1985.  Western 
coal  producers'  share  of  the  Ohio  market  declined  between  1975  and 
1985,  while  their  share  of  the  Illinois  market  remained  nearly 
unchanged. 

Non-utility  Markets 

From  1975  through  1985,  overall  non-utility  demand  for  Illinois 
Basin  coal  declined.  Non-utility  markets  are  divided  into  (1) 
coke  and  gas  plants  and  (2)  other  industrial  uses.  Shipments  of 
coal  from  Illinois  to  coke  and  gas  plants  declined  and  could  not 
be  completely  offset  by  increases  of  shipments  from  Indiana  or 
western  Kentucky  (table  6).  The  decline  in  demand  for  Illinois 
Basin  coal  used  for  coke-making  was  due  to  the  economic  conditions 
in  the  steel  industry  in  the  Chicago  area.  (The  entire  U.S.  steel 
industry  has  lost  markets  to  lower  priced  steel  imported  from 
Europe  and  Asia.) 

The  sales  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  (about  12  million  tons)  for  other 
industrial  uses  remained  virtually  unchanged  in  this  time 
period.  Decreased  shipments  from  Illinois  were  offset  by 
equivalent  increases  in  shipments  from  Indiana  and  western 
Kentucky.  Illinois  coal  was  displaced  by  Indiana  and  western 
Kentucky  coals  in  certain  border  areas,  such  as  Vermilion  and 
Massac  counties,  as  well  as  areas  in  western  Illinois  where  barge 
access  may  have  reduced  transportation  costs. 


Table  6.     Shipments  of   Illinois  Basin  coal   to  non-utility  markets   (million  tons), 
1975  and    1985 

By  state  of  origin  Total 

Illinois Indiana         Western  Kentucky       Illinois  Basin 

Kind  of  shipment  1975       1985       1975        1985  1975  1985  1975         1985 

Coke  and   gas   plants       4.27       2.01  —  --  —  —  4.29         2.01 

Other  industries  6.45       4.16       3.45       5.64         2.12  2.27         12.02       12.07 

Total  10.72       6.17       3.45       5.64         2.12  2.27         16.29       14.08 

Sources:     Bituminous  Coal   and  Lignite  Distribution   1975,   U.S.  Dept.   of  the   Interior, 
Bureau  of  Mines   and  Coal    Distribution  Jan-Dec   1985,   D0E/EIA-0125(85/4Q) . 


IMN97  12  ISGS 


Cost  Competitiveness 

Western  coal  has  successfully  captured  large  portions  of  the 
growing  U.S.  coal  demand,  even  though  modifications  in  clean  air 
legislation  have  made  S02  pollution  less  of  an  issue.  In  1984, 
Illinois  Basin  coal  prices  at  the  mine  were  on  average  lower  than 
in  the  Appalachian  states  but  higher  than  in  the  western  states 
(table  7).  Since  average  mine  labor  productivity  in  the  western 
states  also  was  much  higher,  the  western  states  are  likely  to  con- 
tinue to  hold  a  price  advantage  over  Illinois  Basin  coal  at  the 
mines. 

On  the  basis  of  delivered  price,  Illinois  Basin  coals  do  not 
compare  favorably  with  competitors  in  many  states  of  the  market 
area  (table  8).  Low-sulfur  coals  from  eastern  Kentucky  and  the 
western  states,  as  well  as  imports  from  South  Africa  and  Colombia, 
are  delivered  at  competitive  or  lower  prices  than  Illinois  Basin 
coals.  The  price  competition  is  intense  everywhere  except  in 
Illinois  and  Indiana,  and  even  there  the  situation  could  become 
even  worse  if  attempts  to  decrease  pollution  are  intensified  as 
they  would  be  under  proposed  acid  rain  legislation. 

The  delivered  price  of  coal  includes  the  transportation  cost.  In 
1985  about  50  percent  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  was  transported  by 
rail  and  30  percent  by  barge.  In  comparison,  most  western  coal 
coming  into  the  Illinois  Basin  market  area  was  carried  by  rail  or 
by  a  combination  of  rail  and  barge.  A  comparison  of  1985  rail 
freight  rates  as  a  function  of  distance  is  presented  in  figure 
4.   (Barge  transportation  costs  are  not  available,  but  we  know 
they  are  generally  lower  than  rail  costs.)  The  variations  in 
rates  are  due  to  contract  specifications  such  as  the  annual  ton- 
nage, the  contract  duration,  the  car  ownership,  and  the  size  of 
each  shipment  (i.e.,  single  car,  whole  train,  unit  train).  In 
many  market  areas  the  western  coal  producers,  especially  those 
from  Wyoming  and  Montana,  are  able  to  absorb  the  high  cost  of 
transportation  over  long  distance  and  compete  successfully  with 
the  Illinois  Basin  coal  because  their  mining  costs  are  low  and 
because  transportation  costs  do  not  increase  proportionately  with 
transportation  distance.  As  figure  4  indicates,  the  freight  rate 
does  not  increase  proportionally  to  the  distance.  The  cost  per 
ton  per  mile  generally  declines  as  the  distance  increases. 

In  order  to  be  able  to  regain  their  market  position,  the  producers 
of  Illinois  Basin  coal  must  solve  two  major  problems: 

•  Ways  must  be  found  to  improve  mine  productivity  and  lower 
the  cost  of  mining. 

•  Better  methods  of  cleaning  coal  must  be  developed. 

Because  the  margin  of  possible  quality  improvement  from 
conventional  coal  cleaning  is  smaller  for  Illinois  Basin 
coal  than  for  coals  from  elsewhere  in  the  country,  we  must 
find  better  ways  to  lower  the  sulfur  content  of  the  deliv- 


ISGS  13  IMN97 


Table  7.     FOB  mine  price  and  labor  productivity 
for  major  coal-producing  states,    1984 


Market  state 

Mine  Price 

Labo 

r  Productivity 

($/ton) 

(ton 

/person/hour) 

Illinois 

24.98 

2.22 

Indiana 

25.32 

2.93 

West   Kentucky 

26.81 

2.61 

West   Virginia 

34.18 

1.88 

East   Kentucky 

28.61 

2.13 

Pennsyl vania 

33.48 

1.67 

Virginia 

31.17 

1.61 

Ohio 

33.17 

2.01 

Wyoming 

11.89 

13.77 

Montana 

13.57 

14.27 

Colorado 

23.07 

3.24 

Source:      Coal    Production    1984,   DOE/EIA-01 18( 84) 
p.   30  and  p.  48 


Table  8.     Average  delivered  cost  of  coal   supplied  to  electric  utilities,   1985  (tf/10&   Btu) 


State  of 
Destination 


Alabama 
Arkansas 
Florida 
Georgia 

II 1 inois 
Indiana 
Iowa 
Kansas 

Kentucky 
Michigan 
Minnesota 
Mississippi 

Missouri 

Tennessee 

Wisconsin 


State  of  Origin 


IL  IN         WKY  EKY         MT         WY  CO  UT 

151         —         136         157         —         

158 
215    --    187    216 
165   169     —    182 


Imports 


South 

Africa   Colombia 


164  173 

165  139 
159  115 
248 

140  140 
192 

213  149 
186 

157  146 

128  154 

177  176 


255 


219 


130 
160 

185 


159 
144 


195 
110 


156 
192 

157 

146 

164 


278  336 

270  286 

—  145 

—  137 

188 

140   152 

—   320   330 

119 

188 


Source:  Cost  and  Quality  of  Fuels  for  Electric  Utility  Plants  1985,  D0E/EIA-0191(1985) , 
table  48,  p.  69-72. 


IMN97 


14 


ISGS 


50- 


O 

0) 


cP 


DO  D 


a 
a 


□  DD      a^ 


DDrn   °    £P  ° 

a   (man    a 

0° 


(S>      a 

DD 


~i 1 1 1 1 r 

08  1  12 

Distance  (thousand  miles) 


-i 1 1 1 1 1 T 

14  16  18  2 


Figure  4    1985  railroad  freight  rates  for  coal  (source:  Coal  Week,  1985). 

ered  coal.  About  90  percent  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  is 
currently  cleaned  before  shipment,  therefore,  improvements 
in  coal  quality  must  come  from  better  coal  cleaning  tech- 
nologies. Such  improvements  in  technology  have  been  slow 
in  coming,  however,  partly  because  of  the  development 
costs  involved  and  partly  due  to  the  incentives  given  to 
the  development  of  post-combustion  cleaning  of  flue  gases 
by  clean  air  regulations.  In  contrast,  western  coals  do 
not  need  much  cleaning  because  of  their  low  sulfur 
contents.  Currently,  only  about  5  percent  of  western 
coals  and  about  40  percent  of  the  Appalachian  region  coal 
production  are  cleaned  prior  to  shipment. 

Conclusions  from  1975-1985  Market  Analysis 

The  fact  that  at  least  half  of  the  western  coal  delivered  into  the 
Illinois  market  area  in  1985  was  burned  by  electric  utilities  in 
plants  that  did  not  exist  or  did  not  burn  coal  in  1975  is  indica- 
tive of  the  serious  problem  facing  Illinois  Basin  coal.  Until  now 
the  main  problem  with  Illinois  Basin  coal  seemed  to  be  its  high 
sulfur  content  and,  at  least  in  the  traditional  market  areas,  the 
delivered  cost  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  was  considered  to  be  compet- 
itive. As  a  result,  it  was  safe  to  assume  that  newly  constructed 


ISGS 


15 


IMN97 


electric  utilities  with  mandatory  FGD  equipment  would  elect  to 
burn  the  lower  cost  Illinois  Basin  coal  over  the  low-sulfur, 
higher  priced  western  coals.  Developments  of  the  past  10  years 
and  especially  of  the  1981-85  period  indicate,  however,  that 
western  coals  have  successfully  captured  newly  developing  coal 
markets  as  close  to  the  Illinois  Basin  as  Arkansas,  thereby 
proving  wrong  the  assumption  that  the  RNSPS  would  significantly 
increase  sales  of  Illinois  Basin  coal.  A  review  of  coal-burning 
electric  utilities  that  started  operation  in  the  Illinois  Basin 
market  area  from  1981  through  1985  (table  9)  indicates  that 
Illinois  Basin  coal  represents  only  32  percent  of  this  22,000  MW 
capacity,  while  low-sulfur  coals  from  eastern  and  western  states 
account  for  the  remainder  of  this  capacity.  Despite  favorable 
environmental  conditions,  a  majority  of  the  new  plants  opted  for 
other  than  Illinois  Basin  coal.  It  cannot  be  assumed  without 
reservations  that  in  the  future  Illinois  Basin  coal  will  be  in  a 
strong  position  to  capture  newly  developing  demand  in  its  market 
area. 


MARKETS  FOR  ILLINOIS  BASIN  COAL,  1994  AND  BEYOND 

In  the  future,  markets  for  Illinois  Basin  coal  will  continue  to  be 
affected  by  the  same  factors  affecting  markets  from  1975  through 
1985--environmental  regulations  and  cost  competitiveness—with  the 
added  burden  of  possibly  even  more  stringent  clean  air  legislation 
being  enacted.  Illinois  Basin  coal  markets  for  1994  and  beyond 
are  examined  under  two  scenarios:   (1)  continued  application  of 
RNSPS  and  SIPs  and  (2)  enactment  of  acid  rain  legislation 
requiring  further  S02  reductions. 


Scenario  1:  Continued  Application  of  Current  Regulations 

Under  the  RNSPS,  plants  capable  of  producing  73  MW  of  electricity 
that  have  been  built  since  September  1978  are  required  to  reduce 
SO2  emissions  potential  by  70  to  90  percent  and,  thus,  are 
virtually  forced  to  have  an  FGD  system  installed.  Plants  built 
prior  to  1971  are  regulated  under  the  SIPs  and  are  not  required  to 
limit  their  emissions  severely  enough  to  require  FGD  installa- 
tions. Newer,  larger  plants  will,  therefore,  be  a  primary  area  of 
expansion  for  Illinois  Basin  coal  producers. 

The  USEPA  has  also  released  pollution  standards  for  new  indus- 
trial, commercial,  and  institutional  steam  generating  units  with 
greater  than  29  MW  capacity  and  less  than  73  MW  capacity  (2). 
These  standards  require  intermediate-size  plants  to  achieve  a  90 
percent  reduction  in  S02  emissions  and  to  meet  the  limit  of  1.2 
lbs  SO2/IO6  Btu  heat  input  when  using  conventional  FGD  systems. 


IMN97  16  ISGS 


Table  9.     Coal-burning  electric  utilities  that  started  operation  from  1981-1985  in 
Illinois  Basin  market  states 


State 


Al abama 


Company  and 
Plant  Name 


Alabama  Power 
James  H.  Miller 


Installed 
Capacity 

(MW) 


706 


Year 
Started 


Origin 
of  Coal 


1985 


Al  abama 


Sulfur 

Content 

(%) 


0.57 


Arkansas 


Arkansas  Power 
Independence 

White  Bluff 


800 
800 
800 


1982 
1984 
1981 


Wyoming 
Wyoming 
Wyoming 


0.22 
0.22 
0.45 


Florida 


Georgia 


111 inois 


Indiana 


Iowa 


Florida  Power 
Crystal  River 


Gainesville  (City  of) 
Deerhaven 

Lakeland  (City  of) 
CD.  Mcintosh,  Jr. 

♦Seminole  Electric  Coop 
Semi  nole 

*Tampa  Electric  Co. 
Big  Bend 


Georgia  Power 
Scherer 


♦Central  Illinois  Power  Co. 
Newton 


*Hoosier  Energy  REC  Inc. 
Merom  1,2 

Indiana  and  Michigan  El  Co. 

Rockport  (project  2601) 
*Indianapol is  Power  &  Light 

Petersburgh  4 
♦Northern  IN  Public  Serv. 

R.M.Schahfer  17,18 


♦Public  Service  Co.  of  IN 
Gibson  5 


City  of  Ames  8 

Iowa  Southern  Utility  Co 

Ottumwa  1 
♦City  of  Muscatine 

Muscatine  9 


740  1982  Kentucky  0.79 

740  1984  Virginia  0.68 

West   Vi  rginia  0.68 

Imports  0.64 


251 

1981 

Kentucky 
West  Virg 

inia 

0.65 
0.72 

334 

1982 

Kentucky 

1.51 

620 
620 

1983 
1984 

Kentucky 
11 1 inois 

3.04 
2.65 

486 

1984 

11 1  inois 
Kentucky 

3.00 
2.30 

891 
891 

1981 
1983 

Kentucky 
Virginia 

0.68 
0.70 

617 

1982 

West  Vi  rg 
11 1 inois 
Indiana 

inia 

0.67 
2.60 
0.60 

490 
490 

1983 
1982 

11 1  inois 
Indiana 

3.00 
3.20 

L300 

1984 

Wyoming 

0.36 

574 

1985 

Indiana 

2.20 

848 

82/85 

11 1  inois 
Colorado 
Wyoming  ( 

(42%) 
(33%) 
25%) 

3.00 
0.49 
0.50 

668 

1982 

11 1 inois 
Indiana 

2.40 
2.40 

71 

1981 

Iowa 
Wyoming 

1.24 
0.42 

726 

1981 

Wyoming 

0.38 

160 

1982 

11 1  inois 

2.90 

ISGS 


17 


IMN97 


Table  9  continued 


State 


Company  and 

Instal led 

Year 

Origin 

Sul fur 

Plant  Name 

Capacity 

(MW) 

Started 

of  Coal 

Content 

(%) 

Kansas  City 

Nearman  Creek  1 

262 

1981 

Wyoming 

0.33 

Kansas  Power  &  Light 

Jeffrey  Energy  Center  3 

720 

1983 

Wyoming 

0.34 

Sunflower  Electric  Coop 

Holobomb 

319 

1983 

Wyomi  ng 

0.47 

*Big  River  Electric  Coop 

D.B.  Wilson  1 

501 

1984 

Kentucky 

4.00 

♦Kentucky  Utilities 

Ghent  3,  4 

1,113 

81/84 

Indiana  (50%) 

3.10 

Kansas 


Kentucky 


Michigan 


*Louiville  Gas  &  Electric 
Mill  Creek  4 

Detroit  Edison 

Belle  River  ST1,  ST2 

*Grand  Haven  City  3 

Marquette  City 
Shiras  3 


544 


698 

698 

65 


44 


1982 


1982 


Kentucky  (50%)   0.75 


Kentucky 


1984    Montana 
1985 

1983     Indiana 
Kentucky 


Kentucky 
Montana 


3.26 


0.36 

1.9 
2.9 

0.97 
0.50 


Michigan  South  Central  Pwr.Agy. 
Litchfield  1 

Mississippi   Mississippi  Power 

Victor  Daniel  Jr.  2 

Associated  Electric  Coop 
Thomas  Hi  1 1  3 


Missouri 


Ohio 


*Sikeston  (City  of) 
Sikeston  1 

Dayton  Power  8  Light 
Killen  Station  2 


55 

1982 

Ohio 

3.0 

500 

1981 

Colorado 

0.5 

Utah 

0.5 

670 
235 
666 


Wisconsin     *Wisconsin  Power  A  Light 

Edgewater  5  380 


1982     Missouri 


1981 


II 1  inois 


4.2 


2.5 


1982     Kentucky       0.6 
West  Virginia   0.6 


1984     Illinois  (45%)   3.3 
Wyoming  (55%)   0.3 


Total 


♦Total  burning  Illinois  Basin  Coal 


22,093 
7,153 


(32%) 


Sources:      Inventory  of  Power  Plants   in  the  United  States,   D0E/EIA-0095(85) ,   U.S. 
Department   of   Energy   (Table   15,   p.    34-229   for  plant   starting  date,   capacity  and   fuel    type) 
and  Cost   and  Quality  of  Fuels   for  Electric  Utility  Plants   1985,   D0E/EIA-0191(85) ,   U.S. 
Department   of  Energy   (Table  49,   p.    73-114  for  origin  of  coal    and   sulfur  content). 


IMN97 


18 


ISGS 


Plants  using  an  emerging  S02  control  technology  are  required  to 
achieve  a  50  percent  reduction  in  emission  potential  and  to  meet 
the  limit  of  0.6  lbs  S02/106  Btu  heat  input.  The  90  percent 
reduction  is  similar  to  the  RNSPS  and  therefore  seems  to  favor  the 
use  of  high-sulfur  coal—provided  it  is  priced  lower  than  low- 
sulfur  coal.  The  50  percent  reduction,  applicable  when  an 
emerging  SO2  technology  is  used,  may  favor  the  use  of  lower  sulfur 
coals  and  thus  not  help  future  markets  for  Illinois  Basin  coals. 

A  1985  survey  by  the  National  Coal  Association  indicated  that  by 
1994  about  18,500  MW  of  new  coal -burning,  electric-generating 
capacity  may  be  added  in  the  Illinois  Basin  coal  market  area  as 
shown  in  table  10.  About  30  percent  of  this  new  generating 
capacity  will  be  added  in  states  where  Illinois  Basin's  market 
share  is  already  less  than  4  percent,  namely,  Arkansas,  Kansas, 
Michigan,  Minnesota,  Ohio,  and  Pennsylvania. 

Of  the  future  planned  capacity  in  the  Illinois  Basin  market  area, 
information  about  planned  installation  of  FGD-systems  is  available 
on  a  total  of  8,312  MW.  An  estimated  additional  2,000-MW  FGD 
capacity  is  likely  to  be  added,  but  neither  the  source  of  coal  nor 
its  sulfur  contents  have  been  declared  (3).  Table  11  gives  the 
breakdown  of  planned  scrubber  capacities.  (It  should  be  noted 
that  table  11  data  are  not  comparable  to  table  10  data  because  no 
time  span  for  planned  FGD  is  given.)  The  states  listed  in  table 
11  are  major  consumers  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  and,  therefore,  are 
a  significant  indicator  of  future  FG0  deployment  and  of  future 
prospects  for  Illinois  Basin  coal.  (It  is  also  significant  to 
note  that  no  FGD  systems  are  planned  in  such  Illinois  Basin  market 
states  as  Missouri  and  Tennessee.)  Illinois  Basin  coal  producers 
are  thus  assured  of  a  3,366-MW  market  in  Indiana  and  western 
Kentucky  and  an  estimated  50  to  75  percent  of  the  Florida 
potential  or  1,420  to  2,134  MW,  for  a  maximum  of  5,500  MW. 
Illinois  Basin  coal  producers  share  of  the  Florida  market  has 
sharply  declined  in  the  past  decade  and  competition  from  low- 
sulfur  Appalachian  and  imported  coal  is  rising  in  that  state. 
Neither  Ohio,  with  its  locally  available  high-sulfur  coals  nor 
eastern  Kentucky  with  its  locally  available  low-sulfur  coal  are 
prospective  markets  for  Illinois  Basin  coal.  Arkansas  utility 
plants  use  cheaper,  western  coals  and  are  not  a  viable  market  for 
II linois  Basin  coal . 

At  current  rates  of  capacity  utilization  a  demand  of  1,300  tons  of 
coal  per  1-MW  capacity  per  year  will  be  generated,  adding  about  7 
million  tons  to  the  demand  for  Illinois  Basin  coal  in  1994. 
Extrapolating  the  1994  estimate  for  the  year  2000,  about  12 
million  tons  per  year  of  additional  sales  will  be  generated, 
compared  to  1985.  Assuming  non-utility  Illinois  Basin  coal 
demand  remains  at  its  current  level  of  14  million  tons  per 


ISGS  19  IMN97 


year,  the  total  demand  for  Illinois  Basin  coal  in  1994  is 
estimated  to  be  138  million  tons  (about  143  million  tons  in  the 
year  2000).  Given  their  current  production  proportions,  Illinois, 
Indiana,  and  western  Kentucky's  shares  of  total  basin  demand  for 
the  years  1994  and  2000  will  be: 


II 1 inois 

Indiana 

Western  Kentucky 

TOTAL 


1994 


2000 


(million  tons 
per  year) 


62 
36 

40 


65 
37 
41 


138 


143 


These  projections  of  future  demand  for  Illinois  Basin  coal 
indicate  that  coal  mining  in  the  Illinois  Basin  will  continue  to 
stagnate  until  1994  and  beyond  if  current  clean  air  regulations 
remain  the  only  applicable  sets  of  regulations  and  no  progress  is 
made  with  regard  to  Illinois  Basin  coal's  price  competitiveness. 


Scenario  2:  Acid  Rain  Legislation  Requiring  Further  SO2  Reduction 

Acid  rain  legislation  introduced  in  1986  would  have  required  that 
S02  emissions  be  below  2.0  lbs/106  Btu  by  1993  and  below  1.2 
lbs/106  Btu  by  1997  (on  a  monthly  state-by-state  average  basis). 


Table  10.     New  coal-burning  electric  capacity 
expected  to  come  on   line  by   1994  in   Illinois 
Basin  market   states 


State 

MW 

State 

MW 

Alabama 

1,998 

Michigan 

655 

Arkansas 

836 

Minnesota 

851 

Florida 

1,986 

Mississippi 

— 

Georgia 

1,616 

Missouri 

1,425 

Illinois 

— 

Ohio 

1,300 

Indiana 

2,409 

Pennsylvania 

1,350 

Iowa 

650 

Tennessee 

— 

Kansas 

680 

Wisconsin 

972 

Kentucky 

1,745 

Total    new  capacity:      18,473  MW 

Source:  Steam  Electric  Plant  Factors  1985, 
National  Coal  Association,  Washington,  DC, 
table   16c. 


Table  11.     FGD  capacities  and  sulfur  contents   of 
coal    in  utility  plants  planned  in  the  Illinois 
Basin  coal   market  states 


State 


Capacity  (MW)    Sulfur  (%) 


Ohio 

1,386 
500 

3.5 

unknown 

Indiana 

1,950 

3.5 

Kentucky 

-  West 
■  East 

1,416 
1,000 

3.5 
unknown 

Iowa 

720 

0.4 

Florida 

2,840 

unknown 

Arkansas 

500 

unknown 

Total 

10,312 

Source:  Steam  Electric  Plant  Factors  1985, 
National  Coal  Association,  Washington,  DC, 
table  16c. 


IMN97 


20 


ISGS 


These  reductions  would  have  to  come  from  utilities  built  prior  to 
1971,  that  is,  those  presently  regulated  by  the  SIPs.  This  acid 
rain  bill  permitted  the  SIPs  to  be  flexible  in  terms  of  fuel  mix 
and  technology  choice  and  suggested  means  of  financing  the  cuts. 
The  targeted  S02  emission  reductions  are  listed  by  state  in  table 
12.  In  1980  the  total  S02  emissions  from  utilities  in  the  United 
States  was  about  17.3  million  tons,  of  which  13.2  million  tons 
(76%)  came  from  the  17-state  Illinois  Basin  coal  market  area.  The 
1986  bill  would  have  required  that  by  1993  S02  pollution  be  low- 
ered nationwide  to  5.7  million  tons  below  1980  levels.  By  1997, 
S02  pollution  would  have  to  have  been  lowered  to  10.0  million 
tons  below  1980  levels.  By  1993,  about  5.2  million  tons  (90%)  of 
the  reduction  would  have  to  come  from  the  Illinois  Basin  coal 
market  area;  by  1997  about  8.6  million  tons  (85%)  of  the  reduc- 
tions would  have  been  from  the  Illinois  Basin  coal  market  area. 
Since  the  newly  built  plants  will  be  subject  to  the  1.2  lbs 
S02/106  Btu  limit,  all  the  reductions  from  the  1980  levels  must 
come  from  already  existing  sources  of  pollution,  about  75  percent 
of  which  may,  on  an  average,  have  to  be  from  the  utilities. 

Illinois  Basin  coal  will  suffer  a  potentially  substantial  loss  of 
markets  if  acid  rain  legislation  is  passed  because  many  utilities 
are  expected  to  switch  to  fuels  containing  lower  amounts  of 
sulfur.  How  many  utilities  will  switch  fuels  depends  upon  an 
individual  plant's  economic  situation.  The  cost  of  retrofitting 
with  and  operation  of  FGD  systems  will  have  to  be  compared  to  the 
additional  cost  of  burning  low-sulfur  fuels.  An  additional 
consideration  is  the  age  of  the  plant.  In  general,  the  older  the 
plant  the  greater  the  chances  that  switching  to  a  lower  sulfur 
fuel  may  be  more  beneficial  than  retrofitting  with  FGD.  Older 
plants  also  experience  more  outages  for  repairs  (fig.  5). 
Refurbishing  the  older  plants  can  reduce  outages  but  if  the  cost 
of  refurbishment  exceeds  50  percent  of  the  cost  of  building  a  new 
plant  an  older  plant  may  be  classified  as  a  new  plant  and  subject 
to  RNSPS.  The  plant  would  then  be  required  to  install  an  FGD 
system.  How  old  a  plant  needs  to  be  before  fuel  switching  is 
economical  is  a  matter  of  research  and  no  definite  answer  to  the 
question  can  be  offered  at  this  time.  In  this  report  it  has  been 
assumed  that  utility  plants  20  or  more  years  old  may  be  the  prime 
candidates  for  fuel  switching. 

In  1985,  about  30  percent  of  the  U.S.  electric-generating  capacity 
was  more  than  20  years  old  (fig.  6).  By  1995,  this  percentage  is 
expected  to  increase  to  60.  Thus  it  is  assumed  that  about  30 
percent  (35  million  tons)  of  current  Illinois  Basin  coal  sales  may 
be  affected  by  1994  and  about  60  percent  (70  million  tons)  by  the 
year  2000.  The  ability  of  Illinois  Basin  states  to  increase  their 
production  of  lower  sulfur  coals  is  expected  to  be  limited. 


ISGS  21  IMN97 


Table  12.     Sulfur  dioxide  reduction  targets  as   per  proposed   1986  acid   rain  bill 


SO2  emissions  baseline 

Reductions 

Reductions 

(103 

tons/yr) 

(2 

.0  lbs/MBt 

u) 

(1.2 

lbs/MBU 

) 

1980 

1980 

103 

%   of    % 

Of 

103 

%  of 

%  of 

STATE 

Total 

Utility 

tons/yr 

Total  Ut 

ility 

tons/yr 

Total 

Utility 

♦Alabama 

759 

543 

118 

16 

22 

307 

40 

57 

♦Arkansas 

900 

88 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Alaska 

102 

27 

10 

9 

36 

10 

9 

36 

California 

446 

78 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Colorado 

132 

78 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Connecticut 

72 

32 

0 

0 

1 

0 

0 

1 

Delaware 

109 

53 

23 

21 

44 

23 

21 

44 

D.  Columbia 

15 

5 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

♦Florida 

1,095 

726 

1 

0 

0 

299 

27 

41 

♦Georgia 

840 

737 

279 

33 

38 

480 

57 

65 

Idaho 

47 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

♦Illinois 

1,471 

1,126 

375 

26 

33 

709 

48 

63 

♦Indiana 

2,008 

1,540 

880 

44 

57 

1,173 

58 

76 

♦Iowa 

329 

231 

42 

13 

18 

126 

38 

55 

♦Kansas 

223 

150 

23 

10 

15 

23 

10 

15 

♦Kentucky 

1,121 

1,008 

504 

45 

50 

726 

65 

72 

Louisiana 

304 

25 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Maine 

95 

16 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

6 

Maryland 

338 

223 

32 

9 

14 

117 

35 

52 

Massachusetts 

344 

276 

57 

16 

21 

120 

35 

44 

♦Michigan 

907 

565 

3 

0 

0 

251 

28 

44 

♦Minnesota 

260 

177 

0 

0 

0 

59 

23 

33 

♦Mississippi 

285 

129 

0 

0 

0 

30 

10 

23 

♦Missouri 

1,301 

1,141 

684 

53 

60 

887 

68 

78 

Montana 

164 

23 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Nebraska 

75 

49 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Nevada 

243 

40 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

New  Hampshire 

93 

81 

31 

33 

38 

52 

56 

65 

New  Jersey 

279 

110 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

New  Mexico 

269 

85 

19 

7 

22 

19 

7 

22 

New  York 

944 

480 

5 

1 

1 

137 

15 

29 

North  Carolina 

602 

435 

0 

0 

0 

139 

23 

32 

North  Dakota 

107 

83 

0 

0 

0 

14 

13 

17 

♦Ohio 

2,647 

2,172 

1,143 

43 

53 

1,600 

60 

74 

Oklahoma 

121 

38 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Oregon 

60 

3 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

♦Pennsylvania 

2,022 

1,466 

411 

20 

28 

880 

44 

60 

Rhode  Island 

15 

5 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

South  Carolina 

326 

213 

11 

3 

5 

101 

31 

47 

South  Dakota 

39 

29 

0 

0 

0 

12 

29 

40 

♦Tennessee 

1,077 

934 

479 

45 

51 

681 

63 

73 

Texas 

1,277 

303 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Utah 

72 

23 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Vermont 

7 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

17 

Vi  rginia 

361 

164 

4 

1 

3 

45 

12 

27 

Washington 

272 

69 

27 

10 

39 

29 

10 

41 

West  Virginia 

1,088 

944 

315 

29 

33 

594 

55 

63 

♦Wisconsin 

637 

486 

229 

36 

47 

343 

54 

71 

Wyoming 

184 

121 

50 

27 

41 

50 

27 

41 

US  Total** 

26,480 

17,325 

5,753 

22 

33 

10,035.5 

38 

58 

♦     Illinois   Basin  coal   market   area. 

♦♦  Excluding  Arizona  and  Hawaii. 

Source:     Coal    Week,  April    14,   1986,   p.   7. 


IMN97 


22 


ISGS 


Unit  age  (years) 


Figure  5    Forced  outage  rate  of  coal-fired  steam  units  (source:  Annual  Outlook  for  U.S.  Electric 
Power  1986,  DOE/EIA-0474(86)  p.  27). 


100-i 

number  of  units 
by  age  group 

m 

egaw 

by  a 

att  ce 
ge  g 

ipability 
roup 

1  >40  years 

80- 

| 

30-39  years 

Percent 
o               o 

20-29  years 

jivixj: 

20- 

10-19  years 

<10  years 

r>- 

1985 


1995 


1985 


1995 


Figure  6    Age  and  megawatt  capability  of  coal-fired  steam  units  (source:  Annual  Outlook  for  U.S. 
Electric  Power  1986,  DOE/EIA-0474(86)  p.  26). 


ISGS 


23 


IMN97 


Tables  13  and  14  contain  data  on  Btu/lb  and  sulfur  contents  of 
coal  delivered  to  electric  utilities  from  the  Illinois  Basin 
states  in  1975  and  1984,  respectively.  Although  the  sulfur 
content  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  has  been  lowered,  the  improvement 
is  marginal,  which  means  the  percentage  of  compliance-quality  coal 
is  low.  By  comparison,  the  sulfur  content  of  coal  delivered  from 
West  Virginia  and  Kentucky  declined  significantly  from  1975 
through  1984.  In  1975,  about  19  percent  of  Kentucky  coal  and 
about  25  percent  of  West  Virginia  coal  shipped  to  utilities 
contained  low  enough  sulfur  to  satisfy  the  2.0  lbs/106  Btu 
emission  limits  prescribed  by  many  SIPs  and  targeted  by  the  acid 
rain  proposals  for  1993.  In  1984,  the  percentage  of  these 
compliance  coals  had  risen  to  41  in  Kentucky  and  44  in  West 
Virginia.  Some  of  this  qualitative  improvement  was  due  to  better 
coal  cleaning  but  most  of  it  was  due  to  the  ability  of  these 
states  to  shift  coal  production  to  areas  with  compliance-quality 
coal  deposits.  Although  some  shift  to  medium-sulfur  coal  is 
apparent  in  Indiana,  compliance-quality  coal  reserves  in  the 
Illinois  Basin  are  scarce.  Therefore,  a  major  change  in 
production  of  compliance-quality  coal  appears  unlikely--unless 
significant  new  low-sulfur  deposits  are  discovered  in  the  near 
future.  Thus  the  estimates  of  the  percentage  of  Illinois  Basin 
coal  expected  to  be  affected  by  the  proposed  acid  rain  legislation 
seem  plausible. 

A  worst  case  scenario  for  sales  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  is 
developed  in  table  15.  This  scenario  does  not  account  for 
technological  changes  that  may  occur  in  the  future  that  would 
allow  increased  sales  of  high-sulfur  coals.  Also  unaccounted  for 
are  productivity  changes  in  mines  and  changes  in  transportation 
costs  that  could  affect  the  competititve  situation  of  Illinois 
Basin  coal . 

As  table  15  indicates,  if  acid  rain  legislation  is  enacted  the 
potential  impact  of  decreased  production  of  Illinois  Basin  coal  on 
employment  could  be  serious.  About  25,000  persons  were  employed 
in  the  coal  mines  of  the  Illinois  Basin  in  1985.  They  produced 
about  131  million  tons  of  coal.  Increasing  coal  mining 
productivity  is  expected  to  reduce  the  number  of  persons  employed 
in  coal  mining  in  the  future,  even  without  decreased  production. 
Up  to  5,400  jobs  could  be  jeopardized  by  the  year  1994  due  to 
potential  production  losses.  A  total  of  11,000  jobs  could  be 
jeopardized  by  the  year  2000. 

In  a  best-case  scenario,  all  24  million  tons  of  new  annual  coal 
demand  expected  to  be  created  in  the  Illinois  Basin  market  area 
(as  a  result  of  the  projected  addition  of  18,500  MW  generating 
capacity  by  1994)  would  indeed  come  from  the  Illinois  Basin.  For 
a  best-case  analysis,  we  would  also  have  to  assume  that  no  market 


IMN97  24  ISGS 


Table  13.     Btu/lb  and  percentage  sulfur  of   Illinois   Basin  coal    received  by 
utilities,    1975 


State  of 

Origin 

State  of 
Destination 

111 

inois 

Indiana 

West  Kent 

ucky 

Btu/lb 

S(%) 

Btu/lb 

S(%) 

Btu/lb 

sm 

Alabama 

11,735 

3.1 

10,500 

4.7 

11,271 

3.8 

Arkansas 

-- 

- 

-- 

- 

-- 

- 

Florida 

11,780 

3.0 

12,783 

2.3 

11,397 

2.9 

Georgia 

10,900 

3.4 

11,371 

3.6 

11,669 

2.6 

Illinois 

10,395 

3.3 

11,036 

2.5 

11,047 

3.0 

Indiana 

10,405 

2.7 

10,750 

3.1 

10,919 

3.6 

Iowa 

10,615 

2.7 

10,016 

0.6 

10,506 

3.4 

Kansas 

— 

- 

-- 

- 

-- 

- 

Kentucky 

10,464 

2.8 

10,831 

3.3 

10,555 

4.0 

Michigan 

11,897 

2.5 

11,204 

3.6 

11,878 

3.3 

Minnesota 

10,902 

3.0 

— 

- 

11,172 

4.2 

Mississippi 

11,682 

2.8 

-- 

- 

11,451 

2.9 

Missouri 

11,022 

3.1 

11,371 

3.4 

11,349 

2.7 

Ohio 

__ 

_ 

10,827 

3.3 

10,941 

3.0 

Pennsylvania 

— 

- 

— 

- 

— 

- 

Tennessee 

10,856 

3.3 

11,209 

3.6 

10,918 

3.8 

Wisconsin 

11,133 

2.7 

11,353 

3.6 

11,096 

3.5 

Source:     Annual    Summary  of  Cost   and  Quality  of  Steam-Electric   Plant   Fuels 
1975.     With   supplements   on  the  origin   of   coal,   annual,   May   1976.     Staff 
report   by  the  Bureau  of   Power,   Federal    Power  Commission,   Table   IV, 
p.   43-49. 


Table  14.     Btu/lb  and  percentage  sulfur  of   Illinois   Basin  coal    received  by 
utilities,    1984 


State  of 

origin 

State  of 
Destination 

11 1 inois 

Indiana 

West  Kent 

ucky 

Btu/lb 

S(%) 

Btu/lb 

S(%) 

Btu/lb 

S(%) 

Alabama 

11,885 

1.6 

10,786 

3.3 

11,448 

3.2 

Arkansas 

— 

- 

-- 

- 

-- 

- 

Florida 

11,743 

2.8 

-- 

- 

12,015 

2.8 

Georgia 

11,369 

2.5 

11,265 

2.7 

11,657 

2.9 

11 linois 

10,798 

2.9 

10,935 

1.5 

11,266 

2.2 

Indiana 

10,773 

2.7 

10,890 

2.6 

11,457 

3.3 

Iowa 

11,018 

2.9 

10,916 

3.2 

10,965 

2.8 

Kansas 

11,360 

2.6 

-- 

- 

-- 

- 

Kentucky 

-- 

- 

11,072 

2.5 

11,041 

3.5 

Michigan 

11,579 

2.7 

10,996 

2.8 

— 

- 

Minnesota 

12,342 

1.9 

11,497 

1.8 

11,900 

1.1 

Mississippi 

12,058 

2.6 

— 

- 

12,341 

2.7 

Missouri 

11,144 

2.4 

10,987 

1.3 

11,445 

3.4 

Ohio 

.. 

_ 

-- 

- 

11,383 

3.0 

Pennsylvania 

-- 

- 

-- 

- 

-- 

- 

Tennessee 

11,733 

2.0 

10,957 

1.8 

11,759 

2.7 

Wisconsin 

11,063 

2.8 

11,215 

2.3 

11,766 

2.9 

Source:      Cost  and  Quality  of  Fuels   for  Electric  Utility  Plants   1( 
D0E/EIA-0191(84),   Table   58,    p.   67-71. 


ISGS  25  IMN97 


Table  15.  Projected  markets  for  Illinois  Basin  coal  in  1994  and  2000  if  acid 
rain  legislation  enacted  (million  tons) 


Utility 

Ind 

jstrial 

Total 

Year 

1985  sales 

New  demand 

Losses  due  to 
acid  rain  laws 

Net 
util ity 

1994 
2000 

117 
117 

+  7 
+12 

-35 
-70 

89 
59 

+  14 
+  14 

103 
73 

losses  would  be  suffered  if  acid  rain  legislation  is  enacted. 
Given  these  two  assumptions,  a  comparable  proportional  increase  in 
demand  to  the  year  2000  would  add  a  market  potential  of  18  million 
tons.  This  would  mean  that  by  the  year  1994,  total  coal  sales  in 
the  Illinois  Basin  would  be  155  million  tons.  By  the  year  2000, 
total  tonnage  would  be  173. 


REFERENCES 

(1)  Energy   Information  Administration,   1983,    Impacts  of  the 
proposed   clean   air  act   amendments   of   1982  on   the  coal    and 
electric  utility  industries,  D0E/EIA-0407. 

(2)  Federal    Register,   June   19,    1986,   p.   22384-22419. 

(3)  Steam  Electric  Plant  Factors   1985,   National   Coal   Association, 
table  16c,   p.    147-149. 


IMN97  ?f>  ISGS 


Related  Publications 

Mineral  economics  publications  related  to  this  IMN  that  you  might  wish  to  order  from  the  Illinois 
State  Geological  Survey  are  listed  below.  For  your  convenience  an  order  form  is  provided  on  the 
next  page. 

Illinois  Mineral  series  —  $1.25  each 

55  "The  energy  crisis  and  its  potential  impact  on  the  Illinois  clay  products  industry," 

byR.L  Major,  1974. 

60  "Factors  responsible  for  variation  in  productivity  of  Illinois  coal  mines,"  by 

Ramesh  Malhotra,  1 975. 

76  "Oil:  1 980 — an  analysis  of  the  current  situation  from  an  international,  national 

and  Illinois  perspective,"  by  S.  B.  Bhagwat,  1 980. 

81  "The  future  competitive  position  of  coal  from  the  Illinois  Basin,"  by  S.  B. 

Bhagwat  and  T.  J.  Collias,  1 981 . 

84  "Cost  of  underground  coal  mining  in  Illinois,"  by  S.  B.  Bhagwat  and  Philip 

Robare,1982. 

90  "The  lime  and  limestone  market  for  sulfur  removal:  potential  for  1 992,"  by  S.  B. 

Bhagwat,  1985. 

95  "Illinois  mineral  industry  in  1 984  and  review  of  preliminary  mineral  production 
data  for  1 985,"  by  I.  E.  Samson  and  S.  B.  Bhagwat,  1 987.  (Since  1 931  reports 
such  as  this  have  been  published  annually.) 

96  "Directory  of  Illinois  stone,  sand  and  gravel  producers,  1986-87,"  by  I.  E. 
Samson  and  J.  M.  Masters,  1987. 

Reprint  series  —  $1 .00  each 

1986-G  "Coal  mine  productivity — somethingstheaveragesdon'ttell,"byH.  E.  Risser. 

1980-M  "Market  potential  for  lllilnois  Basin  coal— an  update,"  by  S.  B.  Bhagwat. 

1983-A  "Costofsurfaceminingcoalin  Illinois,"  by  S.B.  Bhagwat. 

1 985-A  "Economic  and  regulatory  framework  for  production  of  solid  compliance  fuels 

from  medium  to  high  sulfur  coal,"  by  S.  B.  Bhagwan  and  L.  A.  Johnson. 

1 986-M  "Recovery  of  fine  grained  sand  and  kaolin  from  sand  washing  tailing  ponds — 

a  feasibility  study,"  by  L.  A.  Khan,  S.  B.  Bhagwat,  J.  W.  Baxter,  and 
D.  J.  Berggren. 

1 986-S  "Economic  feasibility  of  recovering  fines  from  waste  streams  of  mineral 

processing  plants,"  by  L.  A.  Khan,  S.  B.  Bhagwat,  and  J.  W.  Baxter. 

1986-U  "The  United  States  fluorspar  industry  in  a  cost/price  crunch,"  by  S.  B.  Bhagwat. 

1 986-V  "Domestic  utilization  of  high  sulfur  coals:  trends  and  prospects,"  by 

S.  B.  Bhagwat. 

1 987-B  "Economics  of  secondary  recovery  of  coal,"  by  L.  A.  Khan,  S.  B.  Bhagwat,  and 

J.  W.  Baxter. 


Maps  —  $3.00 


"Coal  industry  in  Illinois,"  (scale  1 :500,000)  by  H.  H.  Damberger,  S.  B.  Bhagwat, 
J.  D.  Treworgy,  D.  J.  Berggren,  M.  H.  Bargh,  and  I.  E.  Samson,  1984. 


(Order  form  on  the  reverse  side) 


ILLINOIS  STATE  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 

Attn:  Order  Dept. 

615  E.  Peabody  Drive 

Champaign,  IL    61820 

(217)  333-4747 


Name 


Company 


Address 


City 


State. 


Zip 


Phone. 


Date 


FEIN  or  Social  Security  Number. 


QUANTITY 

ITEM/DESCRIPTION 

UNIT  PRICE 

TOTAL 

□  My  check  c 

□  Please  cha 
□  VISA 

Card  Number 

Subtotal 

rge  my  credit  card  (check  one)                                                   Postage  and  Handling  (see  chart) 

□  MasterCard 

First  Class/U.P.S.  (add  $3.00) 

TOTAL  AMOUNT  ENCLOSED 

Signature 


Expiration  Date 


All  orders  must  be  prepaid.  Payment  must  be  in  U.S.  currency 
(no  stamps  please) .  Make  check  or  money  order  payable  to: 
Illinois  State  Geologial  Survey 

Orders  are  shipped  by  4th  Class  mail  unless  otherwise 
requested.  Please  allow  2  to  4  weeks  for  delivery. 


Shipping  &  Handling  Charges 
Up  to  $3.00  add  $0  70 
3.01  to  6  00  add  95 
6.01  to  9  00  add  1.20 
9  0110  12  00  add  145 
12.01  to  15.00  add  170 
15.01  to  18  00  add  1  95 
18.01  to  22  00  add  2  20 
over  $22  00  add  10% 
to  a  maximum  ol  $15  00 


May  1987