Skip to main content

Full text of "FWS/0BS"

See other formats


Biological  Services  Program 


FWS/OBS-80/09 
June  1980 


W  H  0  I 

DOCUMENT 

COLLECTION 


GRAVEL  REMOVAL 

GUIDELINES  MANUAL 

FOR  ARCTIC  AND 

SUBARCTIC  FLOODPLAINS 


Interagency  Energy-Environment  Research  and  Developnnent  Program 
OFFICE  OF  RESEARCH  AND  DEVELOPMENT 
U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY 
and 


Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 

U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior 


The  Biological  Services  Program  was  established  within 
the  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  to  supply  scientific  informa- 
tion and  methodologies  on  key  environmental  issues  that  im- 
pact fish  and  wildlife  resources  and  their  supporting 
ecosystems. 

Projects  have  been  initiated  in  the  following  areas:  coal 
extraction  and  conversion;  power  plants;  mineral  development; 
water  resource  analysis,  including  stream  alterations  and 
western  water  allocation;  coastal  ecosystems  and  Outer  Con- 
tinental Shelf  development;  National  Wetland  Inventory; 
habitat  classification  and  evaluation;  inventory  and  data 
management  systems;  and  information  management. 

The  Biological  Services  Program  consists  of  the  Office  of 
Biological  Services  in  Washington,  D.C.,  which  is  responsible 
for  overall  planning  and  management;  National  Teams,  which 
provide  the  Program's  central  scientific  and  technical  exper- 
tise and  arrange  for  development  of  information  and 
technology  by  contracting  with  States,  universities,  consulting 
firms,  and  others;  Regional  Teams,  which  provide  local  exper- 
tise and  are  an  important  link  between  the  National  Teams  and 
the  problems  at  the  operating  level;  and  staff  at  certain  Fish 
and  Wildlife  Service  research  facilities,  who  conduct  in-house 
research  studies. 


FWS/OBS-80/09 
June  1980 


GRAVEL  REMOVAL  GUIDELINES  MANUAL 
FOR  ARCTIC  AND  SUBARCTIC  FLOODPLAINS 

U.S.  FISH  AND  WILDLIFE  SERVICE 

by 
Woodward  Clyde  Consultants 

4791  Business  Park  Blvd.,  Suite  1 ,  Anchorage,  Alaska  99503 
Principal  Authors 

M.R.Joyce 

LA.  Rundquist 

L.L.  Moulton 

With  Input  From 
R.W.  Firth,  Jr. 
E.H.  Follmann 

Contract  Number 

FWS-1 4-1 6-0008-970 

This  study  was  funded 

in  part  by  the 

Interagency  Energy-Environment 

Research  and  Development  Program 

Office  of  Research  and  Development 

U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency 

Performed  for  the 

Water  Resources  Analysis  Project 

Office  of  Biological  Services 

U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior 

Washington,  DC  20240 


DISCLAIMER 

The  opinions,  findings,  conclusions, 
or  recommendations  expressed  in  this 
report  are  those  of  the  authors  and 
do  not  reflect  the  views  of  the  Office 
of  Biological  Services,  Fish  and  Wild- 
life Service  or  the  Office  of  Research 
and  Development,  U.S.  Environmental 
Protection  Agency. 


INTRODUCTION 

A  study  was  initiated  in  mid-1975  to  evaluate  the  effects  of  gravel 
removal  from  arctic  and  subarctic  floodplains  in  Alaska.  The  primary  purpose 
of  the  project  was  to  provide  an  information  base  to  assist  resource  man- 
agers in  formulating  recommendations  that  would  minimize  detrimental  environ- 
mental effects  of  gravel  removal  from  floodplain  material  sites.  To  achieve 
this  objective  25  material  sites  were  studied  by  a  team  of  scientists  and 
engineers.  Three  major  products  resulted  from  the  study.  They  are:  (I)  a 
Technical  Report  presenting  synthesis  and  evaluation  of  the  data  collected 
at  the  sites,  (2)  a  Guidelines  Manual  that  aids  the  user  in  developing  plans 
and  operating  material  sites  to  minimize  environmental  effects,  and  (3)  a 
Data  Base  filed  with  the  U.  S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  in  Anchorage  con- 
taining raw  and  reduced  data,  aerial  and  ground  photographs,  and  other 
relevant  material  from  each  site.  This  report  is  the  Guidelines  Manual. 

APPLICABILITY  OF  THE  GUIDELINES 

It  is  important  to  recognize  that  the  guidelines  contained  in  this 
manual  were  developed  from  a  study  of  25  floodplain  material  sites  in  arctic 
and  subarctic  Alaska.  Therefore,  they  deal  neither  generally  nor  specifi- 
cally with  material  sites  in  upland  or  coastal  situations.  Similarly,  they 
do  not  include  evaluation  of  the  relative  acceptability  of  utilizing  an 
existing  active  or  abandoned  material  site  or  an  abandoned  structure  contain- 
ing gravel  (such  as  a  drill  pad  or  airstrip)  rather  than  a  floodplain  site. 
This  should  not  be  interpreted  as  recommending  sites  in  floodplains  over 
other  locations.  WHEN  A  NEED  FOR  GRAVEL  HAS  BEEN  IDENTIFIED,  ALL  ALTERNA- 
TIVES SHOULD  BE  CONSIDERED.  ONLY  AFTER  A  FLOODPLAIN  HAS  BEEN  SELECTED  FOR 
THE  PROPOSED  MATERIAL  SITE  DO  THE  GUIDELINES  CONTAINED  HEREIN  BECOME  APPLI- 
CABLE .   However,  if  used  cautiously  some  guidelines  may  be  utilized  in  other 
site  and  regional  situations. 

The  25  material  sites  exhibited  a  range  of  variation  in  site  age, 
gravel  mining  method  and  location;  and  river  configuration,  origin,  and 
size.  Selected  sites  were  minimally  affected  by  complicating  factors  such  as 


nearby  bridges,  culverts,  villages,  and  other  material  sites.  The  latter 
case  is  significant  in  the  application  of  these  guidelines.  On  large  proj- 
ects it  is  sometimes  necessary  to  locate  a  series  of  material  sites  in  close 
proximity  along  the  floodplain  of  a  river.  The  effects  of  multiple  material 
sites  in  a  floodplain  were  not  evaluated  in  this  study.  Hence  the  appli- 
cation of  these  guidelines  to  multiple  site  projects  must  recognize  this 
shor  tcomi  ng . 

The  user  should  be  thoroughly  familiar  with  the  contents  of  the  Techni- 
cal Report  to  give  perspective  to  the  guidelines  for  their  effective  use. 
THE  GUIDELINES  ARE  DESIGNED  TO  DIRECT  THE  PROCESS  OF  IDENTIFYING,  PLANNING, 
PREPARING,  OPERATING,  AND  CLOSING  MATERIAL  SITES;  THEY  ARE  NOT  MEANT  TO  BE 
USED  AS  STIPULATIONS  TO  BE  USED  IN  EACH  AND  EVERY  CASE. 

It  is  essential  that  the  user  of  these  guidelines  consider  each  materi- 
al site  individually.  Identification  of  unique  characteristics  may  require 
that  certain  guidelines  be  ignored  or  interpreted  differently,  or  different 
combinations  of  guidelines  be  considered.  This  manual  is  intended  for  use  by 
all  individuals  interested  in  floodplain  gravel  removal. 

GRAVEL  REMOVAL  METHODS  AND  CLASSIFICATION 

A  variety  of  gravel  removal  methods  and  river  characteristics  are 
covered  by  this  manual.  In  general,  these  methods  and  river  characteristics 
consi  st  of : 

1.  Scraping  exposed  or  vegetated  gravel  from  active  and  inactive  flood- 
plain  and  terrace  deposits.  Scraping  usually  does  not  involve  work- 
ing in  active  channels. 

2.  Pit  excavation  of  vegetated  gravel  deposits  located  in  inactive 
floodplains  and  terraces. 

3.  Dredging  from  the  bed  of  active  channels  of  large  and  medium-sized 
r  i  vers. 


SUMMARY  OF  PROJECT  RESULTS  AND  CONCLUSIONS 

Study  of  25  floodplain  material  sites  has  shown  that  disturbance  result- 
ing from  gravel  removal  operations  can  be  minimized.  Two  gravel  mining  tech- 
niques were  used  at  the  study  sites,  scraping  of  surface  or  near-surface 
deposits  and  pit  excavation  of  deep  deposits. 

In  general,  approaches  to  minimize  environmental  changes  caused  by 
scraping  included  maintaining  buffers  between  active  channels  and  the  work 
area  and  avoi  ding: 

•  Instream  work 

•  Mining  to  depths  and  in  locations  that  induce  permanent  channel 
shifts  or  ponding  of  water 

•  Clearing  of  riparian  vegetation 

•  Disturbance  to  natural  banks 

Large  rivers  and  braided  rivers  generally  provide  the  most  accessible 
gravels  for  scraping.  Gravel  mining  using  scraping  technqiues  in  these  areas 
frequently  resulted  in  the  least  environmental  changes. 

Pit  excavations  resulted  in  permanent  loss  of  terrestrial  riparian  habi- 
tat, however,  many  pits  increased  local  habitat  diversity.  These  newly 
created  habitats  frequently  received  concentrated  utilization  by  local 
fauna,  particularly  fish,  waterfowl,  shorebirds,  and  furbearers.  Large 
quantities  of  material  were  excavated  using  pit  mining  techniques.  Pits  that 
were  located  on  the  inactive  side  of  the  floodplain,  and  were  separated  by 
vegetated  buffers  in  the  range  of  50  to  100  m,  generally  did  not  influence 
active  channel  hydraulics. 

Pits  were  found  to  be  most  beneficial  to  local  fauna  when  they  exhib- 
ited the  following  characteristics: 


•  2  ha  or  more  in  size 

•  Contained  diverse  shoreline  configuration 

•  Contained  diverse  water  depths 

•  Contai  ned  i  elands 

•  Contained  an  outlet  connected  to  active  channels 


PROCEDURES  FOR  GUIDELINE  USE 

To  use  this  manual  it  is  necessary  to  acquire  information  on  site  loca- 
tion, operation,  and  environmental  conditions.  The  information  consists  of 
descriptions  of  the  site  and  gravel  removal  methods  that  will  allow  predic- 
tion of  floodplain  changes. 

The  manual  is  divided  into  seven  sections  based  primarily  on  the  order  in 
which  a  site  will  be  selected,  reviewed,  and  worked  (Figure  I).  Although  site 
selection  is  the  primary  topic  of  Section  I,  much  of  the  information  in  the 
other  sections  is  also  valuable  in  selecting  appropriate  mining  locations 
and  methods.  For  this  reason,  the  entire  manual  should  be  read  and  clearly 
understood  before  deciding  on  a  final  work  plan.  For  example,  much  of  the 
information  in  Section  VI  -  SITE  OPERATION  can  be  valuable  in  determining 
where  selection  of  a  specific  method  or  location  may  increase  the  amount  of 
available  material  while  decreasing  environmental  alteration. 

After  the  guidelines  have  been  thoroughly  reviewed,  it  is  recommended  the 
sequence  presented  below  should  be  followed. 

SITE  APPL I  CANT 

1.  Identify  suitable  sites  using  the  procedures  described  in  Section  I. 

2.  Develop  a  tentative  plan  on  how  and  where  to  remove  the  required 
gravel  within  the  proposed  site.  Acquire  field  data  needed  to  complete 
Site  Planning  as  described  in  Section  II. 

3.  Evaluate  the  proposed  plan  by  applying  the  appropriate  guidelines  from 
the  SITE  PREPARATION,  SITE  OPERATION,  and  SITE  CLOSURE  Sections.  This 
may  identify  alternative  methods  or  locations  and  potential  problems, 
speed  the  review  process,  and  lead  to  more  efficient  site  operation. 

4.  Develop  a  formal  Work  Plan,  as  described  in  Section  III,  to  be  sub- 
mitted to  the  appropriate  agency. 


Problem 


Geiwfal  S<t< 
SdKtion 


MATERIAL  NEED 


Coastal 


Upland 


Floodplain 


Active  or  Abandoned 
Gravel  Source 


Floodplain 
Gravel 
Removal 

Guidelines 
Manual 


IDENTIFICATION  OF  SUITABLE  SITES 


Section  I 


Decision  1 


Technical  Characteristics 


reject 


Decision  2 


Significant  Environmental  Features 


reject 


Decision  3 


Technical/Economic  Criteria 


reject 


Decision  4 


Other  Environmental  Criteria 


reiect 


eject 


SITE  PLANNING 


Section  II 


SI 

S| 

I 


WORK  PLAN  DEVELOPMENT 


Section  III 


AGENCY  REVIEW 


Section  IV 


4 
I 
I 

1 
I  I 

I    Agency  Site     i 

I  Vicitt  I 

I 


submit 


Applicant  Site 
Reconnaissance 


^M 


'  Applicant  Field  I 


approval 


Visits 


SITE  PREPARATION 


Section  V 


I 


SITE  OPERATION 


Section  VI 


SITE  CLOSURE 


Section  VII 


I       Inspection       ' 
I . ^1 


Figure  I.  Gravel  mining  planning  and  implementation. 


5.  Work  and  close  the  site  in  accordance  with  the  appropriate  guidelines 
and  approved  Work  Plan. 


SITE  REVIEWER 


1.  After  receiving  a  work  plan  completed  in  accordance  with  Sections 

I  through  III,  evaluate  the  plan  and  site  location  for  the  presence  of 
significant  environmental  features  identified  in  Section  IV. 

2.  Visit  the  site  to  evaluate  the  technical  feasibility,  proposed  bounda- 
ries, habitat  quality,  and  possible  environmental  concerns. 

3.  Use  Sections  V  through  VI  I  to  evaluate  the  Work  Plan  and  suggest 
modifications,  if  appropriate. 

4.  Following  approval,  conduct  site  visits  during  operation  and  closure 
to  check  adherence  to  the  approved  Work  Plan. 


Gravel  Removal 
Guidelines 


Identification  of  Suitable  Sites 
Section  I 


Page 

GENERAL  GUIDELINES  II 

SPECIFIC  GUIDELINES   M 

Technical  Characteristics  of 

Alternative  Sites  12 

Areas  or  Species  of  Special 

Concern '2 

Technical  and  Economic  Criteria  .  .  13 

Other  Environmental  Criteria   ...  14 

VERIFICATION  OF  SITE  ACCEPTABILITY  ...  \b 


Identification  of  Suitable  Sites 
Section  I 


A.  GENERAL  GUIDELINES 

A  number  of  factors  influence  the  suitability  of  a  gravel  removal  site. 
Among  these  are: 

•  Technical  Requirements  -  such  as  quantity  and  quality  of  available 
material,  required  processing  (washing  of  fines) 

•  Economics  -  such  as  hauling  distance,  and  site  preparation  and 
rehabilitation  requirements  (overburden  removal,  river-training 
structures,  and  site  grading) 

•  Environmental  Characteristics  -  including  location  within  the  flood- 
plain,  and  biological  characteristics  of  the  site 

Many  projects  require  more  than  one  type  of  material,  and  these  types 
often  will  not  be  available  from  a  single  material  site.  Linear  projects 
such  as  pipelines  and  roads  will  require  sites  spaced  along  their 
length.  In  regions  where  winter  construction  activities  are  required, 
stockpiling  of  gravel  in  summer  may  be  necessary  to  provide  material 
with  lower  moisture  content. 

B.  SPECIFIC  GUIDELINES 

Because  of  the  need  to  incorporate  technical,  economic,  and  environ- 
mental factors,  siting  decisions  must  be  considered  on  a  case-by-case 
basis.  However,  a  sequence  of  four  levels  of  decisions  should  be  util- 
ized in  site  selection.  All  levels  should  consider  both  previously  undis- 
turbed sites  as  well  as  previously  mined  sites.  There  may  be  occasions 


11  I.  IDENTIFICATION  OF  SUITABLE  SITES 


when  previously  mined  sites  are  more  suitable  because  of  the  presence  of 
access  roads,  airstrips,  removed  overburden,  and  existing  unused  stock- 
piled mater  i  a  I . 

A  preliminary  site  visit  is  appropriate  to  provide  input  to  the  follow- 
i  ng  dec  i  s  i  ons. 

1.  Decision  I  -  Technical  Characteristics  of  Alternative  Sites 

Two  initial  steps  are  important  in  the  site  identification  process. 

a.  Determine  that  the  area  can  provide  material  meeting  the 
technical  and  volumetric  requirements  of  the  project.  These 
requirements  must  be  obtainable  within  suitable  buffers  (refer 
to  buffer  recommendations  in  Section  V  A  3  and  Appendix  A). 

b.  Determine  if  more  than  one  specific  site  that  meets  these 
requirements  exists  in  the  area 

Failure  to  determine  availability  of  suitable  material  can  result 
in  unnecessary  economic  cost  and  environmental  damage  if  initial 
mining  activities  show  a  site  to  be  unsuitable.  It  is  desirable  to 
identify  alternative  sites  in  an  area  of  interest  because  not  all 
sites  will  be  acceptable. 

2.  Decision  2  -  Areas  or  Species  of  Special  Concern 

The  alternative  sites  identified  in  Decision  I  should  be  evaluated 
relative  to  their  disturbance  of  the  features  listed  below.  A  site 
affecting  these  areas  should  be  modified,  or  in  some  cases  dis- 
carded, to  minimize  or  eliminate  any  effect. 

a.  Threatened  or  endangered  species  and  their  habitats  that  are 
deemed  essential  to  the  survival  or  recovery  of  these  species 
that  are  recognized  by  Federal  and  State  governments.  A  cur- 
rent listing  of  species  and  information  as  to  their  distri- 

12         I.  IDENTIFICATION  OF  SUITABLE  SITES 


bution  may  be  obtained  from  the  U.  S.  Fish  and  Wildlife 
Service  or  the  State  Fish  and  Game  agency.  Sites  affecting 
these  species  or  their  habitats  may  be  prohibited,  or  require 
substantial  justification. 

b.  Habitats  limiting  local  populations  (such  as  fish  spawning  and 
overwintering  habitats,  Dal  I  sheep  lambing  areas  or  raptor 
nesting  habitats).  Sites  directly  affecting  these  habitats 
should  not  be  considered  further  unless  alternate  sites  are 
not  ava  i  I ab I e. 

c.  Undercut  vegetated  banks  and  associared  riparian  zones 

d.  Incised  vegetated  banks  and  associated  riparian  zones,  except 
for  properly  utilized  access  by  fill  ramps 

e.  Spr  i  ngs 

f.  Active  channels  in  sma I  I  rivers  of  meandering,  sinuous,  and 
straight  configurations 

g.  Wetlands  -  The  primary  criteria  most  frequently  used  in  wet- 
land definitions  include  presence  of  water-saturated  soil  con- 
ditions, and  vegetative  communities  adapted  to  such  con- 
ditions. For  current  definition,  delineation  and  jurisdiction 
refer  to  local  offices  of  the  U.  S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers. 

h.  Other  Federal,  State,  and  private  lands  with  special  use  and 
regulation  such  as  wilderness  areas,  parks,  wildlife  refuges, 
archaeological  areas,  and  historical  landmarks 

3.  Dec  I s  i  on  5  -  Technical  and  Economic  Criteria 

Following  the  determination  that  suitable  material  can  be  obtained 
from  one  or  more  sites  without  disturbance  to  areas  or  species 


13 

I.  IDENTIFICATION  OF  SUITABLE  SITES 


of  special  concern,  strong  emphasis  should  be  placed  on  selecting 
an  economical  site.  Factors  influencing  this  decision  include: 

a.  Amount  of  site  preparation  and  rehabilitation  required.  For 
instance,  it  is  desirable  to  minimize: 

•  Haul  distance  to  project  site 

•  Vegetation  and  overburden  removal 

•  River-training  structures  and  bank  protection  devices 

•  Length  of  access  route 

•  Crossing  of  active  drainage  or  channels 

b.  Matching  site  operational  requirements  to  available  equipment 

c.  Ability  to  work  the  site  in  a  dry  condition 

4.  Dec  i  s  i  on  4  -  Other  Environmental  Criteria 

If  at  this  point  two  or  more  sites  are  suitable,  then  the  following 
environmental  factors  should  be  considered  in  final  site  selection: 

a.  Minimize  disturbance  to  fish  and  wildlife  habitats.  For  ex- 
ample, if  sufficient  gravel  deposits  are  available  elsewhere, 
active  or  high-water  channels  and  vegetated  habitats  should  be 
avoi  ded. 

b.  Minimize  disturbance  to  local  visual  and  scenic  quality.  For 
example,  locate  sites  in  areas  away  from  public  view  or  where 
they  will  be  least  visible;  insofar  as  possible  select  loca- 
tions that  wi  I  I  al  low  one  to  preserve  the  character  of  the 
area. 


14 

I.  IDENTIFICATION  OF  SUITABLE  SITES 


c.  Bed  load  replenishment  rate  should  be  considered  in  site  selec- 
tion if  the  life  span  of  the  site  is  to  cover  several  consec- 
utive years,  even  if  there  will  be  inactive  periods.  Glacial 
and  mountain  origin  rivers,  particularly  near  headwaters,  have 
potentially  higher  replenishment  rates  than  rivers  originating 
in  foothills  or  coastal  plains. 

d.  Projects  requiring  large  gravel  quantities  (roughly  50,000  m 
or  more),  should  consider  the  following: 

•  Scraping  of  unvegetated,  mid-channel  bars  and  lateral  bars 
in  braided  rivers,  and  medium  and  large  split  channel 
rivers.  This  recommendation  should  be  followed  as  long  as 
suitable  buffers  (see  Section  V  A  3  and  Appendix  A)  can  be 
ma  i  nta  i  ned, 

•  Pit  excavation  in  terraces  or  inactive  floodplains,  as  long 
as  sufficient  buffer  is  maintained  between  the  pit  and  the 
act  i  ve  f I oodp  lain 

e.  Projects  requiring  less  than  50,000  m  should  consider: 

•  Scraping  unvegetated  mid-channel  and  lateral  bars  in  braided 
rivers  and  large  and  medium  split  channel  rivers;  this  recom- 
mendation should  be  followed  as  long  as  suitable  buffers  can 
be  ma  i  nta  i  ned 

•  Scraping  point  bars  of  large  and  medium  meandering  rivers 

•  Scraping  in  terraces  or  inactive  floodplains 

C.    VERIFICATION   OF   SITE   ACCEPTABILITY 

Before   proceeding   with    SITE   PLANNING,    review    the    selected   site   on    the 
basis   of    the    entire   Guidelines   Manual.    Give    special    attention    to    the 


15 

I.  IDENTIFICATION  OF  SUITABLE  SITES 


SITE  PREPARATION  and  SITE  OPERATION  sections.  The  matrix  tables  within 
SITE  OPERATION  specifically  present  recommendations  about  gravel  deposit 
type  and  location,  and  mining  method. 

The  purpose  of  this  verification  review  is  to  minimize  decision-making 
delays  resulting  from  failure  to  consider  site  specific  features. 


'^  I.  IDENTIFICATION  OF  SUITABLE  SITES 


Site  Planning 
Section  II 


Page 

GENERAL  GUIDELINES  18 

SPECIFIC  GUIDELINES   22 

Scraping 22 

Pit  Excavation 22 

Dredging 23 


Site  Planning 
Section  II 


Site  planning  should  incorporate  the  SITE  PREPARATION,  SITE  OPERATION, 
and  SITE  CLOSURE  guidelines  presented  in  Sections  V,  VI,  and  VII. 

A.  GENERAL  GUIDELINES 

1.  If  the  technical  method  of  gravel  removal  has  not  been  determined 
during  site  selection,  then  either  scraping,  pit  excavation,  dredg- 
ing or  a  combination  can  be  chosen  by  reviewing  the  SITE  OPERATION 
gu  i  de I  i  nes 

2.  Design  of  the  specific  work  area  boundaries  should  incorporate 
the  following  factors: 

a.  Site  configurations  should  avoid  use  of  long  straight  lines 
and  be  shaped  to  blend  with  physical  features  and  surroundings 
(Figure  2) : 

•  Scraping  point  bars  of  meandering  and  sinuous  systems  to 
maintain  slopes  and  contours  resembling  those  of  the  natural 
bars 

•  Scraping  mid-channel  and  lateral  bars  of  braided  systems, 
to  maintain  natural  gravel  bar  shapes 

•  Excavating  pits  to  provide  irregular  shorelines  with  curved 
configurations,  islands,  spits,  and  diverse  shoreline  depths 

b.  Vegetated  areas  should  not  be  disturbed  when  sufficient  quanti- 
ties of  gravel  can  be  obtained  within  prescribed  buffers  in 
unvegetated  areas  of  floodplains  (buffers  guidelines  are  in 
Section  V  A  3  and  Appendix  A) 

II.  SITE  PLANNING 
18 


c.  When  vegetated  areas  cannot  be  avoided,  it  is  usually  desir- 
able to  locate  material  sites  in  large  stands  of  homogeneous 
mature  vegetated  areas 

d.  The  site  should  be  located  on  the  same  side  of  the  floodplain 
as  the  material  use  point.  This  will  minimize  the  need  for 
crossing  of  active  channels. 

3.  All  work  scheduling  should  attempt  to  avoid  conflicts  with  sensi- 
tive biological  events  and  extreme  hydrological  events. 


Figure  2.  Examples  of  desirable  material  site 
locations  and  configurations. 


a.  In  general,  work  should  be  scheduled  to  avoid  peak  biological 
events,  such  as  local  fish  migration  and  spawning,  and  bird 
and  mammal  breeding,  nesting,  and  rear i ng-of-young.  For  ex- 
ample, site  clearing  of  vegetation  should  occur  in  fall  to 
avoid  the  sensitive  spring  and  early  summer  avian  nesting 
season.  Occasions  may  occur  when  gravel  removal  operations 
should  be  suspended  to  avoid  disturbance  to  an  essential 
b  io I og  i  ca I  event . 


19 


II.  SITE  PLANNING 


b.  Where  site  work  is  occurring  in  the  active  or  inactive  flood- 
plain,  scheduling  should  allow  for  work  suspension  and  removal 
of  equipment,  materials,  and  stockpiles  from  the  floodplain 
during  spring  breakup  or  other  predictable  flood  events 

4.  After  incorporating  the  conclusions  from  the  four  levels  of  deci- 
sions from  Section  I  into  a  final  site  selection,  a  site  investi- 
gation (described  in  Appendix  B)  should  be  conducted  to: 

a.  Verify  that  the  candidate  site  can  produce  the  quantity  and 
quality  of  desired  gravel 

b.  Collect  hydraulic  measurements  such  as  discharge,  channel 
cross  sections,  and  bed  material  size  distribution  whenever 
possible  to  assess  the  hydraulic  conditions  of  the  natural 
channel  (see  Appendix  B). 

c.  Determine  the  presence  or  absence  of  limiting  fish  and  wild- 
life habitat  within  the  project  site.  Analysis  should  be  based 
on  annual  biological  requirements  (i.e.,  fish  spawning  and 
overwintering  habitat). 

d.  Flag  site  boundaries  and  buffer  locations  in  preparation  for 
an  agency  site  inspection.  Flagging  should  be  highly  visible, 
of  weather  resistant  material,  and  maintained  through  site 
operation  and  closure. 

•  Mark  site  boundaries  on  mature  trees  in  timbered  areas  with 
some  highly  visible  material  (such  as  paint  or  cloth 
mater  i  a  I  )  . 

•  For  flagging  in  the  open-water  season  use  l-m  metal  stakes 
or  rods  driven  approximately  0.5  m  into  the  ground  with 

a  red  flag  of  approximately  15  x  15  cm  attached 


20 

II.  SITE  PLANNING 


•  At  sites  to  be  opened  during  winter,  all  work  area  locations 
(such  as  active  channels,  buffer  locations,  vegetated  areas, 
and  gravel  deposits)  should  be  surveyed  from  reference  points 
established  during  the  initial  open-water  site  visit  (Figure 
3).  Reference  points  should  be  selected  so  they  can  be  found 
in  heavy  snow  cover  during  future  site  preparation.  Establish- 
ment of  these  surveys  will  reduce  accidental  damage  to  active 
channels  and  buffer  zones. 


Do  a  summer  travers 
or  stadia  survey  to, 
locate  material  site/ 
boundaries 


Material  site 
boundary 


-Three  or  more  temporary 
bench  marks  which  can 
be  located  during  winter 


Figure  3.  Schematic  diagram  showing  recommended  survey  at  sites 
which  are  to  be  opened  during  winter. 


5.  If  winter  active-channel  mining  is  contemplated,  an  additional  site 
visit  should  be  conducted  during  winter.  This  visit  is  to  determine 
the  presence  of  water  at  or  downstream  from  the  proposed  site. 


II.  SITE  PLANNING 


B.  SPECIFIC  GUIDELINES 

Specific  site  planning  should  proceed  based  upon  the  selected  gravel 
removal  method. 

I.  Scraping  in  Active  and  Inactive  Floodplains: 

a.  Material  sites  should  be  mined  to  ensure  that  after  the  ma- 
terial is  removed,  sufficient  gravel  remains  to  maintain  the 
low-flow  channel  configuration  (refer  to  Section  VI  B  2) 

b.  Since  it  is  most  efficient  to  work  scraped  sites  in  a  dry 
condition,  the  average  depth  of  the  groundwater  table  during 
the  desired  period  of  mining  and  the  effective  use  of  river- 
training  structures  should  be  assessed  (refer  to  Appendix  C  on 
river-training  structures) 

2.  Pit  Excavation  in  Inactive  Floodplains  and  Terraces: 

a.  Pits  should  be  considered  when  a  large  amount  of  gravel 
(>50,000  m  )  is  required  from  a  river  that  does  not  have  large 
exposed  gravel  deposits.  If  scraping  is  conducted  in  a  situ- 
ation where  more  gravel  is  required  than  is  accessible  within 
the  guidelines  for  scraping,  overmining  may  result  with  corres- 
ponding habitat  and  channel  alterations.  In  these  cases,  it  is 
preferable  to  go  to  inactive  floodplains  or  terraces  and  exca- 
vate a  deep  pit  (refer  to  Appendix  D  on  pit  design). 

b.  Pits  should  be  located  in  areas  where  they  will  have  a  low 
probability  of  diverting  channels  into  the  mined  area.  This 
means  they  should  be  located  on  terraces,  inactive  floodplains, 
or  stable  islands  with  the  recommended  buffer.  Terraces  are 
preferred  because  of  the  reduced  probability  of  channel  diver- 
sion. 


22 

II.  SITE  PLANNING 


c.  It  is  usually  desirable  to  locate  the  pit  within  a  dominant, 
homogeneous  mature  vegetative  community.  This  location  will 
reduce  the  chance  that  a  terrestrial  habitat  of  limited  avail- 
ability will  be  affected  and  will  generally  increase  habitat 

d  i  vers  i  t y . 

d.  It  should  be  decided  during  site  planning  whether  or  not  the 
pit  is  to  be  connected  to  the  river  following  the  mining  opera- 
t  i  on 

•  A  pit  outlet  provides  an  avenue  of  escape  for  fish  that 
become  trapped  in  the  pit  during  high  water.  A  connected 
pit,  if  properly  designed,  can  provide  fish  rearing  and 
overwintering  and  increase  the  availability  of  sport  fish. 
Conditions  necessary  to  provide  suitable  fish  habitat  in- 
clude a  diversity  of  depths  with  an  average  depth  that  mini- 
mizes the  probability  of  winter  mortality. 

•  An  unconnected  pit  has  the  potential  to  trap  fish  during 
high  water.  If  the  pit  is  adequately  protected  from  flooding 
with  a  buffer  of  suitable  height,  and  if  the  pit  is  not  to 
be  managed  for  fish  the  creation  of  overwintering  habitat  is 
not  necessary  and  the  average  depth  is  not  critical.  A  diver- 
sity of  water  depths  is  desirable  to  create  adequate  water- 
fowl and  shorebird  habitat. 

3.  Dredging  in  Active  Channels  of  Large  and  Medium  Rivers 

a.  Dredging  in  active  channels  of  large  and  medium  rivers  should 
be  considered  only  if  suitable  floodplain  sites  are  unavail- 
able outside  the  active  channel.  In  this  situation,  nonflood- 
plain  sources  also  should  be  evaluated. 

b.  Sites  located  in  active  channels  should  consider  the  following: 


23 

II.  SITE  PLANNING 


i)    Essential  aquatic  habitat  in  and  downstream  from  the 
site 

ii)   Unimpeded  instream  migrations 

iii)  Maintenance  of  natural  pool:riffle  ratio;  riffles  should 
be  avoided  except  in  the  following  situations: 

•  In  a  long  riffle,  excavation  may  be  acceptable  near 
the  middle  of  the  riffle 

•  When  more  rapid  site  recovery  is  desirable 

•  When  the  riffle  is  unproductive  aquatic  habitat  be- 
cause of  cementation  or  infiltration  by  f i ne °sed iments 

•  Where  deepening  the  thalweg  may  reduce  or  eliminate 
auf e  i  s  development 


24 

II.  SITE  PLANNING 


Work  Plan  Development 
Section  III 


Page 
Maps,  Sketches,  Photographs  ....   26 

Legal  Description 26 

Site  Description 27 

Environmental  Description  28 


Work  Plan  Development 
Section  III 


Detailed  work  plans  should  be  prepared  and  submitted  as  part  of  the  applica- 
tion to  the  appropriate  review  agency.  Work  plans  should  include  detailed 
sketches,  ground  photographs,  topographic  maps,  and  if  available,  aerial 
photographs  showing: 

•  Accurate  site  boundaries 

•  Individual  sequential  work  areas  and  boundaries 

•  Buffer  locations  and  boundaries  for  both  individual  work  areas  and 
the  total  site 

•  Locations  of  all  floodplain  temporary  and  permanent  structures  planned 
for  site  operation  and  closure  (e.g.,  access  roads,  river-training  struc- 
tures, bank  protection  devices,  stockpiles,  washing  and  processing  struc- 
tures, and  overburden  piles) 

•  Locations  of  gravel-use  points  (such  as  access  roads,  airstrips,  and 
camp  pads) 

Visual  resource  classification  maps,  if  available  from  State  or  Federal  agen- 
cies, of  the  region  surrounding  the  work  site,  should  also  be  submitted.  Spe- 
cific sections  of  the  work  plan  should  present  written  descriptions  that 
address  the  following  topics. 

A.  A  brief  legal  project  description  identifying: 

I.  Names  and  addresses  of  applicant  and  major  contractors,  if  known 


III.  WORK  PLAN  DEVELOPMENT 
26 


2.  Intended  material  use,  location  of  material  use,  and  anticipated 
life  of  the  project  utilizing  the  material 

3.  Life  of  the  material  site 

4.  Ownership  of  material  site  and  adjacent  lands 
B.  A  technical  site  description  identifying: 

1.  Size  and  specific  location  of  all  individual  and  cumulative  work 
areas 

2.  Season,  duration,  and  frequency  of  all  site  work  by  individual  work 
area 

3.  Buffer  locations,  dimensions,  type  of  vegetation,  and  soil 
descr  i  pt  i  on 

4.  Methods,  schedules,  and  locations  for  vegetative  and  overburden 
clearing,  temporary  storage  and  handling,  and  permanent  disposal 

5.  Quantity,  type,  and  use  of  material  to  be  removed  from  each  work 
area 

6.  Method  of  gravel  removal'  in  each  work  area,  including  type  and 
number  of  equipment  and  identification  of  each  material  handling 
step  to  be  performed  within  the  material  site  (i.e.,  collection, 
stockpiling,  sorting,  washing,  processing,  transporting).  Locations 
and  operation  of  each  handling  step  should  also  be  identified. 
Washing  operation  descriptions  should  identify  silt  control  proce- 
dures and  processing  operations  should  identify  use  and  storage 
locations  of  materials  such  as  solid  waste  and  cement-processing 
addi  t  i ves. 

7.  Cross-sectional  configuration  and  location  of  progressive  working 
elevations  by  season  or  major  project  scheduling  periods.  For 


III.  WORK  PLAN  DEVELOPMENT 
27 


example,  if  the  site  is  to  be  worked  over  several  years,  ttie  de- 
signed profile  and  configuration  during  each  spring  breakup  and  low 
summer  flow  should  be  identified.  Final  working  profile  and  config- 
uration and  site  closure  profile  and  configuration  should  also  be 
i  dent  i  f  i  ed. 

8.  Specific  locations,  specifications,  material  composition,  and  con- 
struction method  of  access  roads,  river-training  structures,  and 
silt  control  structures. 

9.  Site  closure  (rehabilitation)  methods  and  procedures  including  loca- 
tions and  specifications  of  permanent  structures  (such  as  overburden 
piles).  At  pit  sites  consideration  should  be  given  to  whether  access 
should  remain  after  site  closure.  This  decision  influences  the 
design  life  of  the  access  road. 

10.   Descriptions  of  logistical  support  and  material  transportation 

methods,  general  routes,  and  frequency  to  and  from  the  material  site 

C.  An  environmental  description  of  the  project  area  identifying: 

1.  Known  biological  resources  of  the  general  vicinity,  including  fish- 
ery resources  of  the  subject  river  system 

2.  Timing  of  major  fish  and  wildlife  history  events  and  presence  of 
limiting  habitat  occurring  in  the  vicinity  of  the  material  site 

5.  Hydraulic  characteristics  (such  as  channel  configuration  and  dis- 
charges) in  the  vicinity  of  the  material  site 

D.  The  approved  work  plan  should  be  considered  an  integral  part  of  the 
project  by  both  the  permittee  and  the  permitting  and  monitoring  agencies 


28 

III.  WORK  PLAN  DEVELOPMENT 


Agency  Review 
Section  IV 


Page 

Disapproval  Basis  30 

First  Field  Inspection   31 

Second  Field  Inspection  31 

Third  Field  Inspection   32 


Agency  Review 
Section  IV 


A.  The  proposed  material  site  location  and  accompanying  work  plan  should 
be  reviewed  by  appropriate  agencies  to  evaluate  the  compatibility  of  the 
project  with  the  environment.  This  review  should  consider  disapproval 
or  modification  of  the  work  plan  if  the  material  site  directly  affects 
areas  or  species  of  special  concern.  Examples  of  such  areas  or  species 
i  nc I ude : 

1.  Threatened  or  endangered  species  and  their  habitats  that  are  deemed 
essential  to  the  survival  or  recovery  of  these  species  that  are 
recognized  by  Federal  and  State  governments.  A  current  listing  of 
species  and  information  as  to  their  distribution  may  be  obtained 
from  the  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  or  the  State  Fish  and  Game 
agency.  Sites  affecting  these  species  or  their  habitats  may  be 
prohibited,  or  require  substantial  justification. 

2.  Habitats  limiting  local  populations  (such  as  fish  spawning  and 
overwintering  habitats,  Da  I  I  sheep  lambing  areas  or  raptor  nesting 
habitats).  Sites  directly  affecting  these  habitats  should  not  be 
considered  further  unless  alternate  sites  are  not  available. 

3.  Undercut  vegetated  banks  and  associated  riparian  zones 

4.  Incised  vegetated  banks  and  associated  riparian  zones,  except  for 
properly  utilized  access  by  fill  ramps 

5.  Springs 


^°  IV.  AGENCY  REVIEW 


6.  Active  channels  in  small  rivers  of  meandering,  sinuous,  and  straight 
conf  i  gurat  i  ons 

7.  Wetlands  -  The  primary  criteria  most  frequently  used  in  wetland 
definitions  include  presence  of  water-saturated  soil  conditions,  and 
vegetative  communities  adapted  to  such  conditions.  For  current 
definition,  delineation  and  jurisdiction  refer  to  local  offices  of 
the  U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers, 

8.  Other  Federal,  State,  and  private  lands  with  special  use  and  regula- 
tion such  as  wilderness  areas,  parks,  wildlife  refuges,  archaeolog- 
ical areas,  and  historical  landmarks 

B.  A  field  inspection  of  the  proposed  site  by  the  appropriate  agency  should 
take  place  prior  to  site  approval.  A  field  inspection  as  described  in 
Appendix  B  should  occur  during  an  open-water  season  and  include  an  evalu- 
ation of  : 

1.  Overall  technical  feasibility  of  project  as  detailed  in  the  work 
p  I  an 

2.  Over all  quality  of  fish  and  wildlife  habitat  to  be  disturbed 

3.  Presence  of  any  previously  unknown  features  identified  in  Section 
IV-A 

4.  Hydraulic  characteristics  such  as  discharge  and  stage  in  the  vicin- 
ity of  the  material  site 

Alternative  sites  should  be  requested  of  the  applicant  if  it  is  judged  in 
this  review  that  the  material  site  will  alter  areas  or  species  of  special 
concern  to  the  point  that  population  survival  is  affected. 

C.  A  second  inspection  by  the  appropriate  agency  should  occur  during  site 
operation  to: 


31 

IV.  AGENCY  REVIEW 


1.  Confirm  that  the  work  plan  is  being  followed 

2.  Determine  if  unexpected  biological,  hydraulic,  or  engineering  char- 
acteristics warrant  a  deviation  from  the  original  work  plan 

D.  A  third  field  inspection  by  the  appropriate  agency  should  occur  in  the 
latter  stages  of  site  closure  prior  to  site  abandonment  and  removal  of 
essential  site  closure  equipment  to  ensure: 

1.  Final  slopes,  contours,  and  configurations  of  the  work  area  comply 
with  the  intent  of  the  work  plan 

2.  All  additional  site  closure  work  has  been  performed  and  the  site 
will  be  abandoned,  within  practical  limits,  as  close  to  original 
conditions  as  possible 

Additional  visits  after  closure  may  be  appropriate  (i.e.,  to  monitor  erosion 
con  tro I ) . 


32 

IV.  AGENCY  REVIEW 


Site  Preparation 
Section  V 


Page 

GENERAL  GUIDELINES  34 

Verify  Boundaries  34 

Access 54 

Buffers 35 

Dikes 40 

Vegetation  Clearing  42 

Vegetation/Overburden  Handling   .  .  42 

Settling  Ponds   44 

SPECIFIC  GUIDELINES  FOR  SCRAPED  SITES.  .  44 


Site  Preparation 
Section  V 


A.  GENERAL  GUIDELINES 

1.  At  sites  opened  during  winter  all  work  area  boundaries  established 
during  the  initial  site  visit  (such  as  active  channels,  buffer  loca- 
tions, vegetated  areas,  gravel  deposits)  should  be  verified  to  avoid 
accidental  damage  to  active  channels,  buffer  zones,  and  vegetated 
banks 

2.  Design  of  floodplain  access  should  incorporate  the  following  factors; 

a.  Minimize  access  through  vegetated  habitats 

b.  If  necessary  to  traverse  vegetated  areas: 

•  During  winter  do  not  remove  the  organic  layer  and  do  not 
cover  the  access  route  with  gravel;  use  ice  roads  to  avoid 
compaction  of  organic  layers 

•  During  summer  do  not  remove  the  organic  layer,  but  protect 
from  mechanical  ripping  and  tearing  by  covering  with  gravel 

c.  Floodplain  access  should  occur  at  the  inside  of  a  meander  to 
avoid  trafficing  incised  banks  at  outside  meanders 

d.  Avoid  crossing  other  incised  floodplain  banks 

e.  When  a  bank  crossing  is  required  it  should  be  protected  with 
a  gravel  fill  ramp 

f.  Avoid  crossing  active  channels 


54  V.  SITE  PREPARATION 


g.  When  required,  active  channels  should  be  crossed  via  temporary 
bridges,  low-water  crossings,  or  properly  cul verted  access  road. 
Refer  to  Appendix  E  on  fish  passage. 

h.  Floodplain  travel  to  and  from  the  work  area  should  occur  only 
on  designated  access  roads 

3.  Buffers  are  areas  of  undisturbed  ground  surface  that  are  designed  to 
maintain  the  integrity  of  active  channels.  In  general,  low- flow  or 
flood-flow  buffers  are  recommended  at  a  site.  Low-flow  buffers  are 
recommended  for  scraping  operations  on  unvegetated  gravel  bars  adja- 
cent to  active  channels.  Flood  -flow  buffers  should  be  used  for  scrap- 
ing or  pit-mining  operations  that  are  separated  from  active  channels. 
Operators  of  gravel  removal  activities  may  desire  to  use  buffers  wider 
or  higher  than  those  recommended  in  order  to  protect  the  site  from 
inundation  while  it  is  being  worked,  since  water  levels  at  the  time  of 
ining  may  exceed  those  for  which  the  buffer  is  designed. 


mi  I 


a.  The  low-flow  buffer  is  a  strip  of  undisturbed  ground  surface 

extending  up  the  bank  and  beneath  the  water  surface  from  the  low 
summer  flow  water's  edge  (Figure  4).  Its  purposes  are: 

•  To  maintain  the  integrity  of  the  channel  configuration  and 

•  To  minimize  change  to  the  aquatic  habitat 

The  boundaries  of  the  low-flow  buffer  are  defined  as  follows 
(F  i  gure  5) : 

i)    The  upper  limit  at  any  location  along  the  channel  is  that 
point  on  the  bank  that  is  the  lesser  of  the  following: 

•  having  an  elevation  that  is  0.5  m  above  the  low  summer 
flow  water  surface  elevation 


35  V.  SITE  PREPARATION 


Figure  4.  Schematic  diagram  of  the  low-flow  buffer. 


w 


0.5W 


'_  _  JihannelFuJI  §\?9? y 

0.5m 

Low  Summer  Flow  Stage 


O.IWl 

r^ 


0.5m 
_ow-  Flow  Buffer 


Figure  5.  Schematic  diagram  showing  low-flow  buffer  boundaries, 


36 


•  having  a  horizontal  distance  to  the  low  sunnier  flow 
water's  edge  which  is  equal  to  one-half  the  channel 
top  width  at  channel-full  flow  conditions 

ii)   The  lower  limit  at  any  location  along  the  channel  is  that 
point  on  the  bed  that  has  a  horizontal  distance  to  the 
water's  edge  which  is  10  percent  of  the  top  width  of  the 
low  summer  flow  channel. 

b.  The  flood- flow  buffer  is  a  zone  of  usually  undisturbed  flood- 
plain,  often  vegetated,  separating  the  material  site  from  the 
active  channel  (s)  (Figure  6).  Its  purpose  is  to  prevent  the 


Figure  6.  Schematic  diagram  of  the  flood-flow  buffer. 


37 


V.  SITE  PREPARATION 


active  channel(s)  from  diverting  through  the  material  site  for 
a  selected  period  of  time.  Although  it  is  preferable  to  use 
natural  vegetated  buffers,  man-made  buffers  in  the  form  of  river- 
training  structures  and  bank  protection  devices  (see  Appendix  C) 
may  be  necessary  where  natural  buffers  do  not  exist  or  are  too 
low  to  be  ef  feet  i  ve. 

i)   Flood-flow  buffer  design,  as  discussed  in  Appendix  A, 
should  include  consideration  of: 

•  Buffer  location  with  respect  to  the  active  channel (s) 
and  the  material  site 

•  Buffer  width  sufficient  to  withstand  anticipated 
erosion  without  jeopardizing  the  integrity  of  the 
buf  f er 

•  Buffer  height  sufficient  to  divert  floods 

ii)   Important  variables  to  the  selection  of  buffer  location, 
width,  and  height  include: 

•  Channel  configuration 

•  River  size 

•  Hydrology 

•  Active  channel  alignment 

•  Channel  aufeis 

•  Permafrost  or  ice-rich  banks 

•  Type  of  vegetation 


38  V.  SITE  PREPARATION 


•  Soi  I  compos  i  t  i  on 

iii)  Recommended  flood-flow  buffer  designs  are  listed  below 
for  scrape  and  pit  gravel  removal  operations: 

•  Scrape  -  In  these  sites,  it  is  recommended  that  the 
site  be  protected  from  channel  diversion  by  a  buffer 
for  at  least  5  to  8  years.  This  al lows  the  vegetation 
to  become  re-established.  The  following  Table  lists 
recommended  minimum  buffer  widths  for  different  river 
s  i  zes: 

N\i  n  imum  width 
River  size  (m) 


Sma I  I  15 

Medium  35 

Large  50 

-  The  width  can  be  reduced  to  half  the  recommended 
minimum  at  the  downstream  end  of  the  scraped  site 

-  The  height  of  the  buffer  should  be  at  least  as 
high  as  the  water  level  during  a  5-year  flood 

•  P  i  t  -  In  these  sites,  it  is  recommended  that  the 
site  be  protected  from  channel  diversion  by  a  flood- 
flow  buffer  for  a  period  of  at  least  20  years.  This 
provides  a  more  long-term  protection  of  the  newly 
created  habitat.  The  following  Table  lists  recommended 
minimum  widths  for  different  river  sizes: 

Mini  mum  width 
River  size  (m) 


Sma I  I  75 

Medium  150 

Large  250 


39 


V.  SITE  PREPARATION 


-  The  width  can  be  reduced  to  20  percent  of  the 
recommended  minimum  at  the  downstream  end  of  the 
pit 

-  The  height  of  the  buffer  should  be  at  least  as 
high  as  the  water  level  during  a  20-year  flood 

iv)   Flood-flow  buffers  should  be  designed  on  a  site-specific 
basis  following  the  guidelines  presented  in  Appendix  A 
under  any  of  the  following  conditions: 

•  The  material  site  is  on  a  very  large  river  (e.g., 
Yukon  River,  Kuskokwim  River,  Tanana  River,  and 
Co  I V  i II e  R  i  ver ) 

•  The  available  space  does  not  allow  for  a  buffer  of 
recommended  width 

•  Buffer  height  is  lower  than  the  recommended  design 
height 

•  The  active  channel  is  angled  into  the  bank  at  an  angle 
greater  than  about  30  degrees 

•  Channel  aufeis  occurs  in  the  river  adjacent  to  the 
s  i  te 

•  Banks  consist  of  primarily  sands,  are  sparsely  vege- 
tated, or  are  ice-rich  permafrost  material 

•  Evidence  of  active  bank  erosion  is  found  during  the 
site  visit 

4.  Temporary  dikes  should  be  constructed  around  the  site  if  the  site 
will  be  inundated  during  operation  (Figure  7).  Refer  to  Appendix 
C  discussing  river-training  structures. 

40  V.  SITE  PREPARATION 


a.  Very  large  braided  river 


b-  Medium  braided  river 


c.  Medium  split    river 


d.  Large  meandering    river 


Figure  7.  Potential  locations  of  temporary  dikes  constructed  around  sites 
having  the  potential  to  flood  during  site  operation. 


41 


v.  SITE  PREPARATION 


a.  These  structures  should  be  constructed  to  minimize  disturbance 
to  low- flow  channels 

b.  Dikes  should  be  constructed  of  on-site  gravel  materials 

c.  Fish  entrapment  should  be  avoided  at  all  times 

5.  In  cases  where  vegetated  areas  cannot  be  avoided,  clearing  should 
proceed  using  the  following  guidelines: 

a.  If  possible,  sites  containing  dense  vegetative  cover  should 
be  cleared  during  periods  that  do  not  coincide  with  periods 
of  bird  and  mammal  breeding,  nesting,  and  rear i ng-of-young. 

In  most  cases  fall  would  be  the  most  desirable  period  for  vege- 
tation remova I . 

b.  When  mature  timber  must  be  cut,  It  should  be  salvaged  for  pri- 
vate or  commercial  use.  If  no  such  use  exists,  timber  should 
be  ei  ther : 

•  Stockpiled  out  of  the  active  floodplain 

•  Used  in  site  rehabilitation  of  adjacent  material  sites 

•  Hauled  to  designated  disposal  areas 

•  Piled  and  burned  in  accordance  with  appropriate  regulations 

6.  Other  vegetation  and  organic  overburden  can  be  mechanically  cleared 
and  should  be  collected.  This  material  should  be  saved  for  possible 
use  during  site  closure.  At  sites  located  in  inactive  floodplains 

or  terraces,  this  material  should  be  broadcast  over  the  surface  during 
site  closure.  In  sites  located  only  in  an  active  floodplain,  this 
material  can  be  piled  (not  broadcast)  within  the  site  according  to  the 
following  recommendations.  The  presence  of  this  material  in  the  materi- 

42  V.  SITE  PREPARATION 


al  site  in  an  acceptable  manner  will  facilitate  more  rapid  vegetative 
recovery  and  subsequent  fauna  recovery. 

a.  If  the  site  occurs  only  within  an  inactive  floodplain  or  terrace 
in  any  configuration  or  size  river,  the  material  should  be  tempo- 
rarily stored  either: 

•  In  piles  within  or  on  the  edge  of  the  material  site 

•  In  a  temporary  storage  area  outside  the  material  site  (such 
as  an  approved  disposal  area,  material  site,  or  unvegetated 
inact  i  ve  f loodp lain) 

b.  If  the  site  occurs  only  within  an  active  floodplain,  vegetative 
slash  and  organic  overburden  should  be  disposed  of  based  upon 
river  configuration: 

i)    If  located  in  a  braided  river  this  material  should  not 
be  piled  or  broadcast  in  the  active  floodplain  of  these 
systems 

ii)   If  located  in  a  meandering,  sinuous,  split,  or  straight 
river  this  material  can  be  handled  as  follows: 

•  If  sufficient  space  exists  away  from  the  active  chan- 
nel, store  this  material  in  piles  within  the  material 
site.  On-site  storage  should  occur  at  a  location 
that  reduces  repeated  handling.  During  storage  the 
material  can  be  stockpiled  in  as  small  an  area  as 
possible  to  reduce  excessive  site  enlargement  to 
compensate  for  covered  gravel.  These  materials  should 
be  stockpiled  in  a  location  and  in  such  a  manner 
that  slope  failures  and  erosion  would  not  endanger 
the  adjacent  stream  or  have  other  adverse  effects. 
These  piles  should  be: 


43  V.  SITE  PREPARATION 


-  Located  away  from  active  channels 

-  Long  and  narrow 

-  Orientated  parallel  to  the  flow 

-  Of  sufficient  height  to  be  above  the  2-year  flood 

-  Armored  on  the  active  channel  side  to  prevent 
erosi  on 

Refer  to  Figure  8. 

•  If  insufficient  space  exists  within  the  mined  area 
away  from  active  channels  this  material  may  be  stored 
in: 

-  An  approved  disposal  area 

-  An  upland  area 

-  Other  material  sites 

-  Unvegetated  inactive  floodplains 

7.  Settling  ponds  are  recommended  if  the  materials  are  to  be  washed 
within  the  material  site.  Ponds  should  be  protected  with  dikes  de- 
signed for  the  10-year  flood.  Ponds  generally  should  be  located  as 
far  from  the  active  channel  as  possible.  See  Appendix  F  for  guidelines 
to  be  considered  in  the  design  of  settling  ponds. 

B.  SPECIFIC  GUIDELINES  FOR  SCRAPED  SITES 

I.  Material  sites  worked  during  the  open-water  season  should  be  pro- 
tected from  flows  corresponding  to  at  least  the  2-year  recurrence 

44  V.  SITE  PREPARATION 


Terrace 


Ij^t-r^^ctive  Channel 


High-Water  Channel 


Storage   of 
Overburden 


Riprap  to  Level 
of  2-Year  Flood 


-High  Water   Channel 


Figure  8.  Typical  view  of  temporary  storage  of  overburden  showing  desirable 
location,  shape,  and  armor  protection. 


interval  flood  by  dikes  designed  to  withstand  such  floods  without 
erosion.  These  dikes  should  not  encroach  on  the  low-flow  buffer.  The 
purpose  of  the  dikes  is  to  reduce  the  probability  that  flow  will  pass 
through  the  active  site,  thus  reducing  the  potential  for  introducing 
high  concentrations  of  fine  sediments  into  flows  that  are  incapable  of 
transporting  them  to  normal  dispositional  areas. 


45 


V,  SITE  PREPARATION 


2.  I f  an  unvegetated  site  is  armored  by  coarse  gravels  or  cobbles  that 
do  not  meet  project  material  specifications,  they  should  be  stock- 
piled, used  in  a  dike,  or  otherwise  saved  for  dispersal  over  the 
site  during  site  closure. 

3.  If  it  is  necessary  to  locate  a  material  site  in  an  active  side  chan- 
nel, it  should  first  be  diked  off  at  the  upstream  and  downstream 
ends.  The  dikes  should  be  constructed  to  a  height  corresponding  to  at 
least  the  stage  of  a  5-year  flood  flowing  in  only  the  other  chan- 
nel(s).  The  side  of  the  dikes  facing  the  active  channel  should  be 
protected  against  erosion  during  such  floods.  Floods  larger  than  this 
may  be  allowed  to  overtop  the  dikes  and  flow  through  the  material 
site.  Following  large  floods  the  downstream  dike  should  be  breached  to 
allow  fish  escapement. 


46 

V.  SITE  PREPARATION 


Site  Operation 
Section  VI 


Page 

GENERAL  GUIDELINES  48 

SPECIFIC  GUIDELINES   49 

Site  Matr  i  ces 

Special  Instructions  50 

Braided  Rivers  57 

Split  Channel  Rivers 60 

Meandering,  Sinuous,  and 

Straight  Rivers   63 

Scraped  Sites  65 

Pit-Excavated  Sites  70 

Dredged  Sites  74 


Site  Operation 
Section  VI 


A.  GENERAL  GUIDELINES 

1.  Changing  the  course  of  any  active  channel  should  be  avoided 

2.  All  gravel  removal  operations  should  be  conducted  in  a  clean  and 
efficient  environmentally  acceptable  manner.  For  example: 

a.  All  fuels  and  toxic  materials  should  be  stored  out  of  the  flood- 
plain 

b.  Avoid  fueling  and  servicing  equipment  within  the  active  flood- 
plain  to  reduce  spills  and  disposal  of  materials  (e.g.,  used 
crankcase  oil  and  lubricants) 

c.  The  by-products  from  support  operations  occurring  at  the  material 
site  (such  as  gray  water,  domestic  sewage  and  solid  waste)  should 
be  disposed  of  in  an  approved  fashion  (consult  current  Federal 
and  State  regulations).  In  general  these  by-products  should 

not  be  discarded  within  the  active  or  inactive  floodplains  with- 
out proper  treatment. 

3.  Floodplain  access  and  travel  should  occur  only  as  designated  in  the 
approved  work  plan 

4.  Buffer  zones  should  not  be  disturbed  in  any  manner  that  would  reduce 
their  function.  For  example: 

a.  Vegetative  structure,  width,  and  banks  of  flood-flow  buffers 
should  not  be  altered 

b.  Heavy  equipment  should  not  repeatedly  traffic  low-flow  buffers, 
or  reduce  their  height  or  configuration 

48  VI.  SITE  OPERATION 


5.  The  approved  work  plan  should  be  followed.  If  unexpected  conditions 
are  encountered  in  the  field,  operators  should: 

a.  Immediately  notify  the  appropriate  agency  of  the  encountered 
situation,  and  anticipated  work  deviation 

b.  Proceed  in  a  manner  that  closely  follows  this  manual  until  the 
permitting  agency  responds 

6.  Gravel  washing  operations  within  the  floodplain,  settling  pond  use, 
and  washing  activities  should  be  conducted  per  the  general  recommen- 
dations provided  in  Appendix  F.  In  general: 

a.  Where  gravel  washing  operations  are  required,  the  wash  water 
should  be  recycled  with  no  effluent  discharge  to  the  active 

f loodp lain 

b.  If  settling  ponds  are  required,  they  should  be  designed  to  pro- 
vide adequate  retention  time  for  site-specific  conditions.  The 
outflow  structure  should  be  perched  to  avoid  fish  entrapment. 

c.  The  use  of  a  flocculant  may  be  necessary  to  meet  the  Federal- 
State  effluent  standards 

B.  SPECIFIC  GUIDELINES 

Specific  guidelines  for  site  operation  have  been  developed  for  rivers 
of  different  configuration  and  size,  and  for  different  gravel  deposit 
locations  in  each  configuration  and  size.  The  proposed  site  should  be 
closely  matched  with  the  following  matrix  Tables  which  direct  attention 
to  specific  guidelines  applying  to  scraped,  pit  excavated,  and  dredged 
si  tes. 


'^'^  VI.  SITE  OPERATION 


This  section  is  organized  in  four  parts,  as  follows: 


Page 


I.  Use  of  Guidelines  Matrices 


50 


Gui  de I i  nes 
Based  on 
River  Type 


Special  Instructions  50 

Braided  Rivers  -  Matrix  I,  with  general 

guidelines  statements         57 

Split  Channel  Rivers  -  Matrix  2,  with 

general  guidel ines 
statements  60 

Meandering,  Sinuous,  and  Straight  Rivers  - 
Matrix  3,  with  general 
guidelines  statements        63 


Spec  i  f  i  c  Gu  i  de- 
I ines  Based  on 
Mining  Method 


2.  Scraped  Sites 


3.  Pit  Excavated  Sites 


4.  Dredged  Sites 


65 


70 


74 


I.  Use  of  Guidelines  Matrices 


SPECIAL  INSTRUCTIONS 


River  Configuration 

Each  of  the  three  matrices  is  designed  for  a  specific  river  config- 
uration. The  guidelines  for  one  river  configuration  are  not  identical  to 
those  for  another  configuration,  thus  the  user  must  be  careful  that  the 
proper  matrix  for  the  river  in  question  is  being  used.  The  configurations 
represented  by  the  three  matrices  are: 


50 


VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


•  Braided  Rivers  (Watrix  I) 

•  Split  Channel  River  (Matrix  2) 

•  Meandering,  Sinuous,  and  Straight  Rivers  (Matrix  5) 

Braided  Rivers.  A  braided  river  typically  contains  two  or  more  inter- 
connecting channels  separated  by  unvegetated  gravel  bars  or  vegetated  islands 
(Figure  9a).  Its  floodplain  is  typically  wide  and  sparsely  vegetated,  and 
contains  numerous  high-water  channels.  Bars  separating  the  channels  are 
usually  low,  gravel  surfaced,  and  easily  eroded. 

Split  Channel  Rivers.  A  split  channel  river  has  numerous  stable  islands 
which  divide  the  flow  into  two  channels  (Figure  9b).  There  are  usually  no 
more  than  two  channels  at  a  given  reach  and  other  reaches  are  single  channel. 
The  banl<s  of  the  channel (s)  are  typically  vegetated  and  stable.  The  split 
river  floodplain  is  typically  narrow  relative  to  the  channel  width. 

Meandering,  Sinuous,  and  Straight  Rivers.  Meandering  and  sinuous  rivers 
(Figures  9c  and  9d)  have  a  single  channel  that  winds  back  and  forth  within 
the  floodplain;  straight  rivers  wind  less.  Very  few  islands  are  found  in 
these  systems.  Point  bars  and  lateral  bars  are  common,  with  point  bars  more 
frequent  in  meandering  rivers  and  lateral  bars  in  straight  rivers.  Banks  on 
the  outside  of  a  bend  in  a  meandering  river  are  normally  unstable  whereas  the 
banks  of  a  straight  river  are  relatively  stable.  The  floodplains  of  mean- 
dering and  sinuous  rivers  are  usually  as  wide  as  the  meander  belt,  and  there- 
fore, are  narrower  for  sinuous  rivers  than  for  meandering  rivers.  Floodplains 
of  straight  rivers  are  narrow. 

Template  Preparation 

Required  Data.  After  the  proper  matrix  has  been  identified,  the  template 
describing  the  work  plan  can  be  prepared.  A  template  can  either  be  prepared 
by:  (I)  using  the  blank  template  provided  in  the  back  of  this  manual,  or  (2) 
aligning  a  blank  sheet  of  paper  under  the  parameter  descriptions  of  one  of  the 


^'  VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


^;®?=*'" 


i|SEv 


^S*. 


a.  Braided  River 


b.  Split  Channel  River 


C.  Meandering   River 


"3? 


d.  Sinuous  River 


Figure  9.   Examples  of  river  configurations  (straight  rivers 
are  similar  to  sinuous  but  with  a  lower  sinuosity  ratio). 


52 


VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


matrices,  drawing  lines  on  the  blank  sheet  to  correspond  to  ttiose  of  the 
heading  columns  and  identifying  each  parameter  in  its  proper  position.  An 
example  of  a  template  will  be  shown  later  (Figure  12a).  To  fill  out  the  tem- 
plate the  following  information  ia  required: 

•  The  size  of  the  river  at  which  the  mining  operation  will  be  conducted 
(small,  medium,  or  large) 


•  The  site  location  or  locations  with  respect  to  floodplain  type  (active, 
inactive,  terrace)  (see  Figure  10) 


10 

ll 

c 
O 

hannel 

Channel 
annels 

S^ 

■o 

CD 

^               s             6 

<o 

o 

III 

^ 

c 

•^                -^_            ,i— .         .j'^^ywfk'^ 

ryxXrha^ 

i2i&            < 

I              ^-^A         '      ^.      /3Li*iaiai7 

^ 

V,.     UJ^i 

M^.^^'^'-'-'-^^^Mi.   _ 

1 

— 

V ^       .  '^  ^^  r  ^ 

0) 

03 

^^^'"^^^ 

5 

0) 

1 

Terrace 

Inactive 

Floodplain 

Active     Floodplain 

Terrace 

> 

f 

\ 

/ 

\ 

/                                                \ 

'                 \ 

\ 

\ 

7\ 

A                                                                                A                            1     / 

Figure    10. 

Floodplain    location    types. 

•  The  type  of  channel  or  channels  associated  with  the  desired  gravel 
deposit  (active,  high-water,  abandoned)  (see  Figure  II) 

•  The  type  of  gravel  deposits  to  be  mined  (see  Figure  II) 

Fi I  I ing  Out  a  Template.  For  each  individual  template  evaluation,  only 
one  river  size,  site  location,  and  associated  channel  can  be  used.  Any  number 
of  deposit  types  can  be  used  as  long  as  they  are  all  associated  with  the 
same  floodplain  and  channel  type  being  considered. 


53 


VI  .  SITE  OPERATION 


Outside 
Meander 


Inside 
Meander 


^; — Vegetated  Banic 

\ 


^    Outside 
Meander 


Island 


Inside 
Meander 


1 


Vegetated  Bank 


Lateral  Bar 


Vegetated    Bank 


rlgure  Jj.  Types  of  deposit 


I.  Place  an  "X"  under  the  template  space  which  corresponds  to  the  indi- 
vidual parameter  being  considered  (Figure  12a). 


54 


VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


Sne 


Sire 


X     XX, 


Ml   9 


/Jas<c 


Is  ¥>  •»  i  t:  *  5 


lypEof 


i^ioimOum»i       eePosrr 


River 
Sue 


a.  Prepare  Teinplate 


SPLIT  CHANNEL  RIVER 


U        C         IT)        «)         W 


River 
Size 

E 
%    1    S, 

^15 

SPL 

sue 

Location 

c 
£     5 
5    a 
a  o 
o    o 

"-    ;   « 
S   S   iil 
5   !^    E 
<   £    " 

IT  CH* 

Assoc 

Channel 

ill 
HI 

NNEL  RIVER 

Typeot  Deposit 

»    ?    ^ 

"  -  1  1  s 

• "  i  1  ?  1 1 

"   s  2   «  c  2  ; 
2   1    1  1  II   II 

mo-    _.I£o>> 

CommenI  Number 

M 

M 

M 

X 

K 

1 

K 

X 

K 

X 

n 

X 

X 

M 

X 

2 

K 

X 

K 

X 

K 

X 

X 

K 

X 

3« 

K 

X 

X 

X 

)<. 

X 

4 

5 

6 

7 

II! 

5l? 

Its 

111 

8 
9 
10 

5 

5 

on 

tov 

a 

HO. 

7 
i 

5g 

re 

Offl 

CommenI  Number 


b.  Compare  to 

Appropriate 

Matrix 


c.  Find  Comment  Number  for 
Type  of  Deposit  Desired 


d.  Search  for  Additional 
Matches  if  Multiple 
Deposits  are  Checked 


River 
Size 

-    1    . 
Ill 

^       -i.       -i 

SPL 

Sue 
Location 

c     1 

3    a 
a  T3 

°  \L 

ill 

<    S    * 

ri  CH/ 

Assoc 
Channel 

s  1   ? 

<  I  < 

MNEL  RIVER 

Typed  Deposit 

1  s  i  1  = 
.  5  s  s  1  s  s 
s  1  1  I  s  i  i 

Comment  Number 

X 

X 

X 

X 

M 

1 

X 

X 

X 

X 

K 

X 

X 

X 

X 

2 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

34i- 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

4 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

5 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

eN- 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

7 

8 

9 

10 

III 

5/T£ 

U>orf»o4 

AsScc. 

beposr 

Figure  12.  Example  of  how  the  completed  template  is  matched  to  determine 
availability  of  gravel. 


55 


2.  When  the  template  is  complete,  compare  the  template  to  the  appropriate 
matr  i  X  ( F  i  gure  I  2b ) . 

5.  Follow  down  the  matrix  until  river  size,  site  location,  associated 

channel,  and  one  deposit  type  are  matched  (Figure  12c).  Record  Comment 
Number . 

4.  If  more  than  one  deposit  has  been  "X"ed,  continue  down  until  another 
match  is  found,  then  record  Comment  Number  (Figure  I2d). 

5.  After  all  deposit  types  have  been  matched,  read  the  appropriate  guide- 
lines Comment(s)  to  determine  if  and  how  gravel  is  available.  Specific 
mining  guidelines  are  referenced. 

6.  Repeat  steps  I  to  5  for  other  combinations  of  floodplain  and  channel 
type. 


VI  .  SITE  OPERATION 

DO 


(0 

in 

c 
a> 

E 
E 

o 
o 

1.  Gravel  may  be  available  by  scraping 
or  dredg  i  ng . 

2.  Gravel  available  by  scraping. 

3.  Gravel  available  by  scraping. 

4.  Generally  should  not  be  mined. 

5.  Banks  should  not  be  mined. 

6.  Gravel  available  by  scraping. 

7.  Gravel  available  by  scraping. 

8.  Gravel  available  by  scraping  or  pit 
mining. 

in 
o 

O- 
0) 
TD 

o 

Q- 

:^ 

1— 

>|UBq   pa464a6a/\ 

puB|si    pa4B|a6aA 

japuBauj   ap!S4no 

jepuBaiii   ap  1  su  1 

jBq    1  auuBqo-p 1 w 

jsq    |Bja4B"i 

JBq    4U|0d 

psg 

X                         X 

X                           XX 

XX                                     XX 
XX                                     XX 

X                                     XXX 

0) 

(0    01 
•  -    c 
o    c 
o    ro 
in  sz 
in    o 
< 

lauuBqo    pauopuBqv 

lauuBqo    ja46M-q6|H 

1  auuBqo    aA  !  40V 

XX                 X                 X 
X       X       X       X       X 
XX                   XX 

c 

o 

0)    — 
—      10 

CO    o 
O 

aoBjjai 

u  1  B 1 dpoo 14    aA 1 40BU | 

u 1 B| dpoo 14    aA  I  40V 

X                   XX 
X       X       X       X                 X 
X              X       X       X       X       X 

>      N 

cc    in 

aBjBi 

Lun  1  paw 

1  leijus 

X   X   x' 

XXX 
XXX 
XXX 
XXX 
XXX 
XXX 

XXX 

ro 

Q. 


J3 


c 
(V 

e 

E 

o 
o 

"D 
fl) 

c 

10 
Q. 
X 


57 


VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


Expanded  Comments  for  Braided  Rivers 

Comment-  I.  Generally,  the  bed  of  an  active  channel  should  not  be  dis- 
turbed. If  bed  deposits  are  the  only  available  source,  the  gravel  should 
be  taken  only  under  strict  work  plans  and  stipulations. 

•  It  is  recommended  that  side  channel  (s)  be  mined  rather  than  the  main 
channel.  Select  side  channel (s)  that  carry  less  than  approximately 
one  third  of  the  total  flow  during  the  mining  period;  block  off  up- 
stream ends  and  mine  by  scraping  operations.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guide- 
I ines  (VI  B  2) . 

•  If  the  main  channel  must  be  mined,  dredging  may  be  an  appropriate 
method.  Refer  to  Dredging  Guidelines  (VI  B  4). 

Comment  2.  Gravel  is  available  by  scraping  gravel  deposits  to  near  the 
low  summer  flow,  maintaining  appropriate  buffers,  or  no  lower  than  the  water 
level  present  during  the  mining  operation.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  B 
2). 

Comment  3.  Gravel  is  available  by  scraping  such  that  the  configuration 
of  the  channel  is  not  greatly  changed  and  there  is  not  a  high  probability 
of  channel  diversion  through  the  mined  area.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines 
(VI  B  2). 

Comment  4.  Vegetated  islands  are  often  a  limited  habitat  in  these  systems 
and  should  generally  be  excluded  from  the  work  plan.  Exposed  deposits  should 
be  considered  before  vegetated  island  deposits.  If  deposits  in  feasible  alter- 
native locations  are  not  sufficient,  and  vegetated  islands  are  abundant  in  the 
particular  reach  in  question,  up  to  about  10  to  20  percent  of  this  habitat  may 
be  removed  from  about  a  given  5-km  length  of  the  floodplain.  Refer  to  Scraping 
Guidelines  (VI  B  2)  or  Pit  Guidelines  (VI  B  3). 

Comment  5.  Vegetated  river  banks  of  both  active  and  high-water  channels 
should  not  be  disturbed  because  of  biological  and  hydraulic  alterations. 
These  should  be  removed  from  work  plans. 


58 

VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


Comment  6.  Gravel  is  available  by  scraping  within  the  channel,  but  the 
general  configuration  of  the  channel  should  be  maintained.  Refer  to  Scraping 
Guidel ines  (VI  B  2). 


Comment  7.  In  these  systems  it  is  recommended  to  scrape  exposed  deposits 
in  the  active  floodplain.  If  sufficient  gravel  is  not  available  in  the  pre- 
ferred deposits,  gravel  may  be  available  by  scraping  in  these  locations,  but 
the  general  configuration  of  the  channel  should  be  maintained.  Refer  to  Scrap- 
ing Guidel ines  (VI  B  2) . 

Comment  8.  In  these  systems  it  is  recommended  to  scrape  exposed  deposits 
in  the  active  floodplain.  If  sufficient  gravel  is  not  available  in  the  pre- 
ferred deposits,  gravel  is  available  in  these  locations  by  either  pit  or 
scrape  methods.  Generally,  pits  should  only  be  considered  when  more  than 
50,000  m  are  required.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  B  2)  and  Pit  Guide- 
I  ines  (VI  B  3). 


^^  VI.  SITE  OPERATION 


CN 
X 

cr 
< 


CO 

oc 

UJ 

> 


< 

u 


CL 


(D 

in 

-*- 
c 
0) 
E 
E 
O 

u 



1.  Gravel  may  be  available  by  scraping 
or  dredging. 

2.  Gravel  available  by  scraping. 

3.  Some  gravel  may  be  available  by 
scraping  or  pit. 

4.  Generally  should  not  be  mined. 

5.  Banks  should  not  be  mined. 

6.  Gravel  available  by  scraping. 

7.  Should  not  be  mined. 

8.  Generally  avoid,  not  much  available. 

9.  Gravel  available  by  scrape  or  pit. 
10.  Gravel  available  by  scraping. 

-t- 

in 

O 
a. 

0) 
■D 

o 

0) 
Q- 

>. 

1— 

>iUBq    pa4B4a6aA 

pu6|si    pa4B4e6aA 

japusauj   ap|S4no 

japusauj   apisu| 

jBq    1  auuBqo-p  |\fl/ 

JBq     |BJa46-| 

JBq    4U!Od 

psg 

XXX 

X   X 

X 

X 

X    X    X    X 

X    X    X    X    X    X    X 

X    X    X    X    X    X 

XXXXXXXX 

X    X    X    X    X    X    X 

"D 
0) 

—    c 
o    c 

O     <D 

<n  -c 
(fl     o 
< 

lauuBqo    pauopuBqv 

lauuB^D    ja4eM-g6]H 

1  auusgo    aA | 4Dv 

■ — - — ■ — . 

X 

X              XXX                 X                 X 

X              XX              XX                 X 

c 

o 

0)    — 
■*-    -«- 
—      (D 

CO    u 
0 

aoB jjai 

u  !  e| dpoo| 4    aA  i  4dbu| 

u 1 B| dpoo| 4    aA 1 4DV 

X               XXX                   XXX 
X               XXX                   XX 

X          XX          xxxxx 

<U    (U 

>      fvj 

a6j6i 
Lun  ]paw 

1    IBLUS 

X              XX              XXX                            XX 
X              XX              XXX                           XX 
XX                 XXX 

60 


SITE    OPERATION 


Expanded  Comments  for  Split  Rivers 

Comment  I .  General ly  the  bed  of  an  active  channel  should  not  be  dis- 
turbed. If  bed  deposits  are  the  only  available  source,  the  gravel  should 
be  taken  by  dredging  or  scraping  under  strict  work  plans  and  stipulations. 

•  It  is  recommended  that  side  channel (s)  be  mined  rather  than  the  main 
channel.  If  the  site  contains  a  side  channel  that  caries  less  than 
approximately  one  third  of  the  total  flow  during  the  mining  period  this 
channel  can  be  blocked  at  its  upstream  end  and  mined  by  scraping. 
Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  B  2). 

•  If  channels  approximating  this  size  are  not  available  then  either 

the  side  or  main  channel  can  be  mined  using  dredging.  Refer  to  Dredging 
Gu  i  del  ines  (VI  B  4) . 

Comment  2.  Gravel  is  available  by  scraping  deposits  to  near  the  low 
summer  flow,  maintaining  appropriate  buffers,  or  no  lower  than  the  water  level 
present  during  the  mining  operation.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  8  2). 

Comment  3.  Gravel  is  available  if  suitable  buffers  are  maintained  to 
protect  against  channel  diversion.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  B  2), 
Pit  Excavation  Guidelines  (VI  B  3),  and  Buffer  Recommendations  (V  A  3  and 
Append  i  x  A ) . 

Comment  4.  Vegetated  islands  are  often  a  limited  habitat  in  these  systems 
and  often  control  channel  integrity.  Exposed  deposits  should  be  considered 
before  vegetated  island  deposits.  If  deposits  in  feasible  alternative  loca- 
tions are  not  sufficient,  and  vegetated  islands  are  abundant  in  the  river 
system  in  question,  about  10  to  20  percent  of  this  habitat  may  be  removed  from 
about  a  5-km  reach  of  floodplain.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  B  2)  and 
Pit  Guidel ines  (VI  B  3) . 

Comment  5.  Vegetated  river  banks  of  both  active  and  high-water  channels 
should  not  be  disturbed  because  of  biological  and  hydraulic  alterations. 
These  areas  should  be  removed  from  work  plans. 

61 

VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


Comment  6.  Gravel  is  available  by  scraping  in  the  high-water  channel, 
but  precautions  must  be  taken  to  avoid  channel  diversion.  Refer  to  Scraping 
Guidel ines  (VI  B  2). 

Comment  7.  Mining  is  not  recommended  in  or  near  the  active  channel  of 
small  split  channel  rivers  because  there  is  not  much  material  available. 

Comment  8.  There  generally  is  not  much  material  available  in  these  de- 
posits and  they  should  be  avoided.  If  only  a  small  amount  (<I0,000  m  )  of 
gravel  is  needed,  these  deposits  may  be  considered  for  scraping.  Refer  to 
Scraping  Guidelines  (  iV  B  2). 

Comment  9.  Grave!  is  available  by  either  pit  or  scrape  methods.  Generally 
these  should  be  considered  for  large  amounts  of  gravel  that  are  not  present 
in  adequate  amounts  in  exposed  deposits.  Pits  should  be  considered  when  more 
than  50,000  m   are  required.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  B  2)  and  Pit 
Guidel ines  (VI  B  3) . 

Comment  10.  Some  gravel  is  available  by  scraping,  but  the  general  config- 
uration of  the  channel  should  be  maintained.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines 
(VI  B  2). 


62  VI.  SITE  OPERATION 


(0 

c 
a> 

E 
E 

o 
u 

1.  Some  gravel  may  be  available  by 
dredg  i  ng . 

2.  Gravel  available  by  scraping. 

3.  Some  gravel  may  be  available. 

4.  Not  recommended  in  these  systems. 

5.  Banks  should  not  be  mined. 

6.  Gravel  available  by  scraping. 

7.  Should  not  be  mined. 

8.  Generally  avoid,  not  much  available. 

9.  Gravel  available  by  pit  or  scrape. 

m 
o 
a. 

0) 

■o 
o 

0) 
Q. 

>^ 

t- 

>|UBq    pe4B4a6aA 

puB 1 s !    pa4B4a6eA 

japuBaw   ap]S4no 

jepueaiu   ap|su| 

JBq    |auu6qD-p!(^ 

jBq    |6ja4B"i 

jsq    4U!0d 

psg 

X 

XXX 

X   X 

X 

X 
X   X    X    X 
X    X    X    X    X    X 
X    X    X    X    X    X        X 

xxxxxxxx 

■D 

Q) 
■*-    — 

(0     Q) 
—    c 

o    c 

O     10 

in    u 
< 

lauuBqo    pauopuBqv 

|auuBL|D    ja4BM-q6iH 

1 auuBgo    aA ! 4DV 

■■ 

X       X 
X       X       X       X       X 
X              X       X       X       X                 X 

c 
0 
01    — 
-+-    -t- 
—     (0 
lO    o 
O 

aoBjjai 

u  1  B 1 dpoo| 4    aA 1 4oeu | 

u 1 B| dpoo| 4    aA 1 4DV 

X       X       X       X       X                 X 
X       X       X       X       X       X       X 

X          X     X     X     X     X     X 

1- 

01     0) 
>      N 

ce    in 

aSjBi 

Lun  I  paw 

1  leujs 

X              X       X       X       X       X                           X 
X              X       X       X       X       X                           X 

XX                   XXX 

01 
O) 
10 
O- 

cn 

c 

g 

o 


CD 

a> 


E 
E 
O 

o 


■o 

c 

ID 

a. 

X 

LU 
(0 


63 


VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


Expanded  Comments  for  Meandering,  Sinuous,  and  Straight  Rivers 

Comment  I .  Generally  the  bed  of  an  active  channel  should  not  be  dis- 
turbed. If  bed  deposits  are  the  only  available  source,  the  gravel  should 
be  taken  by  dredging  only  under  strict  work  plans  and  stipulations.  Refer 
to  Dredging  Guidelines  (VI  B  4). 

Comment  2.  Gravel  is  available  by  scraping  deposits  to  near  the  low 
summer  flow,  maintaining  appropriate  buffers,  or  no  lower  than  the  water  level 
present  during  the  mining  operation.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  B  2). 

Comment  5.  Gravel  is  available  if  suitable  buffers  are  maintained  to 
protect  against  channel  diversion.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  B  2), 
Pit  Guidelines  (VI  B  3),  and  Buffer  Recommendations  (V  A  3  and  Appendix  A). 

Comment  4.  Vegetated  islands  are  rare  in  these  river  systems  and  should 
not  be  disturbed.  It  is  recommended  they  be  removed  from  the  work  plan. 

Comment  5.  Vegetated  river  banks  of  both  active  and  high-water  channels 
should  not  be  disturbed  because  of  biological  and  hydraulic  alterations.  These 
areas  should  be  removed  from  the  work  plan. 

Comment  6.  Gravel  is  available  by  scraping  in  the  high-water  channel, 
but  precautions  must  be  taken  to  avoid  channel  diversion.  Refer  to  Scraping 
Guidel ines  (VI  B  2) . 

Comment  7.  Mining  in  the  active  or  high-water  channels  of  these  small 
rivers  is  not  recommended  because  there  is  not  much  material  available. 


Comment  8.  There  generally  is  not  much  gravel  available  in  these  deposits 
nd  they  should  be  avoided.  If  only  a  small  amount  (<I0,000  m  )  of  gravel 
s  needed,  scraping  may  be  considered.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  B-2 ) . 


Comment  9.  Gravel  is  available  by  either  pit  or  scrape  methods.  Generally 
these  areas  should  be  considered  for  large  amounts  of  gravel  that  are  not 


64 

VI.  SITE  OPERATION 


present  in  adequate  amounts  in  exposed  deposits.  Pits  should  be  considered 
wtien  more  than  50,000  m   are  required.  Refer  to  Scraping  Guidelines  (VI  B  2) 
and  Pit  Guidel  ines  (VI  B  3) . 

2.  Specific  Guidelines  for  Scraped  Sites 


a.  Gravel  bars  adjacent  to  high-water  and  abandoned  channels  can 
be  scraped  to  a  specified  level  at  the  edge  of  the  channel  and 
should  be  sloped  toward  the  channel  to  provide  proper  drainage. 
An  average  maximum  depth  should  be  maintained  in  the  channel  to 
provide  for  flow  containment  during  periods  of  low  flow  within 
the  channel.  The  average  maximum  depth  at  any  point  along  the 
channel  is  the  distance  between  the  average  thalweg  profile  line 
and  the  channel-full  stage  at  that  point  (Figure  13). 


-Sianne/ -Fu// 


Channel -Ful 


Average  Maximum      ^'^^^ 


Thalweg  Profile 

Average  Thalweg  Profile 


Channel  Thalweg 
Cross  Section  A-A 


Figure  13.  Definition  of  average  maximum  depth  and  channel-full  width  in  a 
channe  I  . 


Recommended  values  of  maximum  depth  that  should  be  maintained  in 
the  channel  are  listed  below  for  three  ranges  of  channel-full 
width.  Values  of  half  the  recommended  depths  should  be  considered 
minimum  depths  below  which  flow  containment  would  be  ineffective. 


65 


VI  .  SITE  OPERATION 


Braided  Configuration 

Recommended  maximum  depth  (m) 
Channel-full      High-water  channels        Abandoned  channels 
width 
(m) 


0-5  0.30  0.05 

5-50  0.50  0. 15 

30  or  greater  0.80  0.50 


Split,  Meandering,  Sinuous,  and  Straight  Configurations 

Recommended  maximum  depth  (m) 
Channel-full      High-water  channels        Abandoned  channels 
width 
(m) 


0-5  0.40  0. 15 

5-30  0.60  0.30 

30  or  greater  1.00  0.60 


b.  Gravel  bars  adjacent  to  active  channels  can  be  scraped  to  a 

specified  minimum  level  and  should  be  sloped  toward  the  channel 
to  provide  proper  drainage.  The  purpose  of  a  minimum  level  is 
to  minimize  hydraulic  change  to  the  active  channel  at  low  flows. 
The  recommended  minimum  level  of  gravel  removal  is  controlled 
by  the  highest  of  the  following  three  levels: 


66 

VI  .  SITE  OPERATION 


•  The  upper  level  of  the  low-flow  buffer.  This  is  defined 
in  Site  Preparation  Guidelines  (V  A  5a) 

•  The  level  corresponding  to  0.15  m  above  the  average  water 
level  expected  during  the  gravel  removal  operation 

•  The  level  that  will  maintain  a  specified  averaye  maximum 
depth  in  the  channel  (Figure  15).  Recommended  values  and 
minimum  values  of  maximum  depth  that  should  be  maintained 
are  listed  below  for  three  channel  width  ranges  at  channel- 
full  flow.  Values  of  half  the  recommended  depths  should  be 
considered  minimum  depths  below  which  hydraulic  change  is 
more  likely  to  occur. 

Braided  Configuration 

Channel-ful I  Recommended 

width  maximum  depth 

(m)  (m) 

0-5  0.50 

5-50  0.50 

50  or  greater  I .00 


Split,  Meandering,  Sinuous,  and  Straight  Configurations 

Channel-full  Recommended 

width  maximum  depth 

(m)  (m) 


0-5  0.50 

5-50  I .00 

50  or  greater  I .50 


67 


VI  .  SITE  OPERATION 


c.  Scraping  in  high-water  and  abandoned  channels  should  follow 
the  alignment  of  the  channel.  Gravel  removal  design  depends 
on  several  factors  listed  below: 

•  Side  slopes  should  be  stable  for  expected  flow  conditions 
during  a  2-year  recurrence  interval  flood.  This  will  reduce 
the  potential  for  rapid  channel  shifting. 

•  Channel-full  top  width  should  not  be  increased  if  it  can 
be  avoided.  If  additional  material  is  needed  that  cannot 
be  obtained  from  other  dry  channels  or  unvegetated  bars, 

the  channel  being  worked  can  be  widened  to  a  width  no  greater 
than  that  of  the  active  channel  and  preferably  half  that  of 
the  active  channel  (especially  on  meandering,  sinuous,  and 
strai  ght  r  i vers) . 

•  Longitudinal  channel  slope  into  the  material  site  should  not 
exceed  10  times  the  average  slope  of  the  channel  (Figure  14). 
This  will  minimize  the  potential  for  extensive  upstream  bed 
degradation.  The  upstream  end  of  the  section  of  increased 
slope  should  be  a  sufficient  distance  from  the  nearest  active 
channel  to  minimize  the  potential  for  channel  diversion. 


Top  of  Adjacent  Bar  or  Bank 


Original  Channel  Bed 


^////  MatenaTRemoved^ 

•^'-UUl-i  LJU.U  ij-ijjuju  UjIl/Uj 


-Slope  <  10  X  Overall 
Channel  Slope 


Maintain  Positive  Slope- 
Low- Flow  Buffer 


Figure  14.  Sketch  of  high-water  or  abandoned  channel  longitudinal 
profile  showing  recommended  channel  bed  slopes  resulting  from  scrap- 
ing the  channel  bed. 


68 


VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


•  Longitudinal  channel  slope  out  of  the  material  site  at  the 
downstream  end  should  not  be  adverse  (bed  elevation  in- 
creasing in  the  downstream  direction).  Adverse  slopes  cause 
ponding  and  potential  fish  entrapment.  Maintaining  a  positive 
slope  (bed  elevation  decreasing  in  the  downstream  direction) 
is  recommended  to  allow  for  channel  drainage  during  a  flood 
recession.  The  downstream  end  of  the  disturbance  should  be 
separated  from  the  nearest  active  channel  by  at  least  the 
width  of  the  low-flow  buffer  for  that  channel  (Figure  14). 

d.  Scraping  in  active  side  channels  that  have  been  diked  and  de- 
watered  should  follow  the  alignment  of  the  channel  and  should 
stay  between  the  low-flow  buffers.  Gravel  removal  design  depends 
on  other  related  factors  listed  below. 

•  Side  slopes  should  be  stable  for  expected  flow  conditions 
during  a  5-year  recurrence  interval  flood.  This  will  minimize 
the  potential  for  slope  failure  and  subsequent  deterioration 
of  the  low- flow  buffer. 

•  The  width  of  excavation  is  limited  by  the  limits  of  the 
low-flow  buffers  (Figure  15).  The  bottom  width  is  limited 
only  by  the  equipment  used. 


""^^ 


Low-Flow 
Buffer - 


Low     Summer    Flow    Stage 


Maximum    Excavation  Width 


Stable  Side  Slopes 


-^WA^ 


777} 

Material  Removed  ' 


Low -Flow 
^—Buffer 


Figure  15.  Sketch  of  active  side  channel  cross  section  defining 
excavation  limitations. 


69 


VI.  SITE  OPERATION 


•  Channel  slope  into  and  out  of  the  material  site  should  be 
stable  under  all  flow  conditions  up  to  and  including  a  5-year 
flood.  This  will  minimize  the  potential  for  bed  degradation. 

•  The  existing  pool-riffle  sequence  should  be  retained  during 
the  gravel  removal  operation.  If  it  is  disturbed,  a  similar 
sequence  should  be  restored  following  the  operation. 

•  Active  channels  scheduled  for  winter  scraping  should  be 
evaluated  for  the  presence  of  flowing  water  in  and  downstream 
from  the  site;  if  water  is  present,  the  site  should  not  be 
mined. 

e.  Mining  of  high-water  or  abandoned  channel  bed  and  associated  bars 
should  follow  Guidelines  VI  B  2c  and  VI  B  2a,  in  that  order,  if 
sufficient  gravel  quantities  are  not  available  from  only  one  of 
these  sources.  If  sufficient  gravel  quantities  are  still  not 
available  and  channels  are  not  abundant,  or  if  high-water  or 
abandoned  channels  are  not  available,  it  may  be  necessary  to  form 
new  wel l-def i ned  channels  following  Guideline  VI  B  2c.  High-water 
channels  formed  during  the  gravel  mining  operation  should  have  an 
alignment  similar  to  that  of  natural  high-water  channels  or  the 
active  channel (s)  of  the  river. 

3.  Specific  Guidelines  for  Pit-Excavated  Sites 

A  profile  and  configuration  of  the  work  area  should  be  maintained 
to  provide: 

a.  A  minimum  surface  area  of  2.0  ha.  Inundated  pits  smaller  than 
this  size  are  generally  not  heavily  utilized  by  waterfowl.  If 
the  pit  is  connected  to  the  river,  a  mean  depth  of  2.5  m  or 
greater  should  be  provided  to  insure  winter  survival  of  fish. 


70 

VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


b.  A  relatively  long  and  narrow  shape  aligned  longitudinally  in 
the  floodplain  and  providing  an  irregular  configuration  with 
islands  and  peninsulas  is  preferable  (Figure  16a  and  16b) 

•  Islands  and  low  peninsulas  provide  more  diverse  shoreline 
and  aquatic  habitats 

•  If  the  river  does  divert  through  the  pit,  it  will  have  an 
alignment  to  follow  and  will  more  quickly  develop  into  a 
channel  configuration 

c.  An  outlet  channel  for  a  path  of  low  resistance  when  the  pit  is 
inundated,  reducing  erosion  of  undisturbed  terrestrial  habitat. 
An  outlet  channel  also  provides  an  avenue  of  escape  for  fish 
which  may  become  trapped  during  high  flows. 

•  Outlet  channels  should  be  deep  enough  to  allow  fish  passage 
during  low  flow  conditions  and  be  as  narrow  as  possible 

•  All  outlet  channels  should  be  on  the  downstream  end  of  the 
pit  to  prevent  premature  degradation  of  the  stream  channel 
and  p  i  t 

•  Outlet  channels  should  be  connected  to  a  non-depos i t i ona I 
area  of  an  active  channel  and  be  angled  downstream 

•  Outlet  channels  should  not  be  of  straight  line  configuration 

•  Outlet  channels  should  be  constructed  at  the  end  of  the 
site  closure  to  minimize  siltation  in  the  river 

d.  A  diversity  of  water  depths  and  bank  slope 

•  At  least  30  to  50  percent  of  the  shoreline  should  have  a 
gradual  slope  to  provide  areas  for  emergent  aquatic  vegeta- 


71 

VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


a.  Aerial  view  of  an  acceptable  pit  configuration. 


Deep  Regior 


Island 


Marsh/ 
Littoral  Area-N  Lowland- 


b.  Side  view  of  an  acceptable  depth  regime  (Section  A -A). 


Figure  16.  Example  of  a  preferred  shape  and  depth  profile  of  gravel 
pits  in  floodplain  terraces  and  connected  to  the  active  channel. 


72 


VI .  SITE  OPERATION 


tion,  shorebird  and  wateffowl  feeding,  juvenile  fish  rearing, 
and  muskrat  habitat  (Figure  16b).  The  gradual  slope  of  these 
areas  should  allow  a  natural  transition  of  vegetative  com- 
munities and  provide  exposed  mud  flats  or  the  potential 
for  future  marsh  habitat  development. 

•  The  remaining  shoreline  should  be  more  steeply  sloped  to 
provide  habitat  more  beneficial  to  other  groups  such  as 
diving  ducks,  geese,  swans,  beaver,  and  adult  fish 

•  As  mentioned  above,  a  mean  depth  of  2.5  m  or  greater  of 
combined  littoral  and  deep  areas  should  be  provided  if  there 
is  an  outlet  channel  or  if  a  non-connected  pit  is  to  be 
managed  for  fish.  For  example,  25  percent  littoral  area 
averaging  0.5  m  and  75  percent  deep  area  averaging  3.2  m 
yields  an  overall  mean  depth  of  2.5  m.  Refer  to  the  Pit 
Design  Appendix  D. 

•  In  a  pit  not  connected  to  the  active  channel,  and  not  to  be 
managed  for  fish,  a  similar  shape  and  depth  configuration  is 
appropriate,  but  a  mean  depth  of  2.5  m  is  not  required.  These 
pits  should  be  protected  with  an  adequate  buffer  from  flood- 
ing so  that  fish  entrapment  is  minimized.  In  this  case,  the 
main  purpose  is  the  creation  of  shorebird  and  waterfowl 

hab  i  t  at . 

•  If  there  is  a  choice  between  mining  to  a  shallow  depth  over 
a  broad  surface  area  or  deep  over  a  restricted  surface  area, 
the  choice  should  be  to  increase  depth  before  increasing 
area.  This  minimizes  terrestrial  disturbance  and  reduces  the 
probability  of  fish  winter  mortality. 


73 

VI  .  SITE  OPERATION 


4.  Specific  Guidelines  for  Dredged  Sites 

a.  Active  channels  scheduled  for  winter  dredging  should  be  evaluated 
for  the  presence  of  flowing  water  in  and  downstream  from  the 
site;  if  water  is  found,  the  site  should  not  be  mined 

b.  Depth  of  excavation  in  an  active  channel  should  be  limited  by 
the  width  of  the  low  summer  flow  channel  minus  the  low-flow  buf- 
fer; the  side  slopes  should  be  designed  to  remain  stable  during 
5-year  flood  flows 

c.  The  length  of  excavation  in  a  pool  of  the  active  main  channel 
should  not  exceed  the  length  of  the  pool.  If  a  riffle  is  to 

be  mined,  the  length  of  excavation  should  not  exceed  the  average 
length  of  the  pools  within  5  km  up  and  downstream  of  the  site. 

d.  The  bed  slopes  at  the  upstream  and  downstream  ends  of  the  active 
channel  excavation  should  be  designed  to  remain  stable  during 
5-year  flood  flows  to  minimize  the  potential  for  degradation 


74 

VI.  SITE  OPERATION 


Site  Closure 
Section  VII 


Page 

GENERAL  GUIDELINES  76 

SPECIFIC  GUIDELINES   80 

Scraped  Sites  80 

Pit-Excavated  Sites  80 

Dredged  Sites  81 


Site  Closure 
Section  VII 


A.  GENERAL  GUIDELINES 

After  mining  is  completed,  material  sites  should  be  rehabilitated  to 
return  them,  as  closely  as  is  possible,  to  pre-mining  condition. 

1.  The  site  should  be  sloped  and  contoured  immediately  following  comple- 
tion of  operations.  In  cases  where  sites  consist  of  two  or  more 
aliquots,  each  should  be  sloped  and  contoured  as  completed.  Any 
seeding  and  fertilizing  should  be  done  in  spring  or  summer. 

2.  The  work  area  should  be  shaped  and  contoured  to  minimize  ponding 
and  to  blend  with  surrounding  features  and  topography 

5.  Access  roads,  culverts,  and  bridges  should  be  removed  (unless  other- 
wise approved)  and  the  areas  restored.  Fill  ramps  at  incised  banks 
should  also  be  removed  and  the  bank  stabilized  (if  damaged)  to 
minimize  subsequent  erosion. 

4.  All  manmade  debris  should  be  removed  from  the  site 

5.  All  cut  slopes  encountered  during  gravel  removal  or  access  road 
construction  should  be  stabilized  to  prevent  thermal,  fluvial,  and 
wind  erosion 

6.  Dewater  settling  ponds  of  the  clear  surface  water  either  by  pumping 
or  lowering  dikes.  Silt  may  be: 

•  Left  in  place  in  inactive  floodplains  and  terrace  locations; 
protective  structures  should  be  lowered  to  a  level  corresponding 
to  the  level  of  the  impounded  silt 


^^  VI  I.  SITE  CLOSURE 


•  Broadcast  or  piled  with  ottier  overburden  and  vegetative  slasti 
and  debris  (refer  to  guideline  VII  A  7) 

•  Removed  from  active  floodplain  sites  to  approved  disposal  areas 

7.  In  general,  at  sites  ttiat  were  previously  vegetated  and  will  contain 
nonflooded  areas  following  site  operation,  rehabilitation  should 
facilitate  natural  revegetation  and  site  recovery.  When  organic 
overburden  and  vegetative  slash  and  debris  are  available,  it  is 
recommended  that  natural  revegetation  be  favored  over  artificial 
seeding  and  fertilization.  Final  placement  of  overburden  and  vege- 
tative slash  and  debris  should  incorporate  the  following  guidelines. 

a.  Active  floodplains 

i)    In  braided  systems  it  is  unlikely  that  any  overburden  or 

vegetative  slash  and  debris  will  be  available.  However,  if 
available  it  should  not  be  piled  within  the  active  flood- 
plain. 

ii)   In  meandering,  sinuous,  split,  and  straight  systems  this 
material  may  be  piled  within  the  active  floodplain.  The 
design  and  loction  of  these  piles  should  incorporate 
the  following  (Figure  17).  They  should  be: 

•  Located  away  from  active  channels  and  in  areas  where 
they  are  subjected  to  the  least  hydraulic  erosion 

•  Long  and  narrow  in  configuration  (about  15-20  m  long 
and  3-5  m  wide,  where  possible) 

•  Orientated  parallel  to  the  flow 

•  About  I  m  above  the  2-year  recurrence  flood  at  its  top 


^^  VII.  SITE  CLOSURE 


Temporary  Pile  Shape. 
During  Operation 

(Refer  to  Fig. 8) 


Pile  at 
Closure- 


At  Least 
15— 20m  Long 


Armor  to    2-Year 
Flood  Stage 


-At   Least 
3-5m   Wide 


2-Year  Flood   Stage 


JZ^ 


Material  Site, 
Surface  — 


Figure  17.  Typical  view  of  desirable  shape  and  configuration,  relative  to  2-year 
flood  levels,  of  permanent  I y  placed  overburden  piles. 


•  Armored  on  ttie  active  side  to  prevent  erosion  (refer 
to  discussions  of  bank  protection  in  Appendix  C) 

•  Piled  to  maximize  surface  area,  provided  ttiis  meets 
the  above  cr  i  ter  ia 

If  sufficient  material  exists,  it  is  desirable  to  produce 
several  piles  distributed  throughout  the  mined  area. 
If  insufficient  material  exists  to  meet  the  above  cri- 
teria, it  should  not  be  piled  within  the  active  flood- 


78 


VII.  SITE  CLOSURE 


plain.  If  insufficient  space  exists  within  the  mined 
area  away  from  the  active  channel,  this  material  may 
be  used  either  in  site  rehabilitation  of  adjacent  material 
sites  or  disposed  of  in  approved  upland  areas. 

iii)  Neither  artificial  seeding  nor  fertilization  should  be 
conducted  in  active  floodplains 

b.  Inactive  floodplains  and  terraces 

At  these  locations  in  rivers  of  all  configurations  this  ma- 
terial may  be  either  piled  or  broadcast  over  the  ground  surface 

i)    At  sites  consisting  only  of  inactive  floodplains  that 
are  annually  flooded  it  may  be  best  to  pile  this  ma- 
terial rather  than  broadcast  it  to  reduce  downstream 
transport.  If  piled,  the  guidelines  presented  above 
(7a)  should  be  followed. 

ii)   At  sites  including  terraces  and  inactive  floodplains 
that  are  not  annually  flooded,  this  material  should 
be  broadcast  throughout  these  portions  of  the  mined 
site.  In  general,  this  material  should  be  spread  about 
10  cm  deep  and  should  cover  as  large  an  area  as  pos- 
sible. 

iii)  If  this  material  is  not  available  for  use  in  site  reha- 
bilitation of  terraces  and  inactive  floodplains,  arti- 
ficial seeding  and  fertilization  may  be  considered 
and  should  follow  current  state-of-the-art  techniques 
for  arctic  and  subarctic  regions 


^^  VI  I .  SITE  CLOSURE 


B.  SPECIFIC  GUIDELINES 

1.  Specific  Guidelines  for  Scraped  Sites 

a.  Distribute  coarse  gravels  or  cobbles,  when  available,  over  the 
surface  of  the  gravel  removal  area,  to  provide  for  a  more  rapid 
rearmoring  of  the  surface 

b.  If  the  low-flow  buffer  was  disturbed,  return  it  to  its  natural 
configuration  and  height 

c.  At  side  channel  sites  which  were  diked  to  work  in  a  dry  con- 
dition, remove  the  downstream  dike  and  lower  the  upstream  dike 

to  a  level  corresponding  to  the  river  stage  of  a  1.25-year  flood. 
This  will  prevent  large  quantities  of  sediment  from  being  washed 
from  the  site  into  the  river  at  low-flow  conditions. 

2.  Specific  Guidelines  for  Pit  Excavated  Sites 

a.  Overburden  and  vegetated  slash  and  debris  should  be: 

•  Broadcast  or  piled,  or  both,  in  the  nonflooded  portions  of 
the  mine  site,  including  islands  and  shorelines 

•  If  any  material  remains,  some  may  be  placed  in  the  flooded 
portion  of  the  site  to  provide  nutrients  and  cover 

b.  Slope  and  contour  shoreline  banks  and  all  overburden  stockpiles 
in  nonflooded  portions  of  the  mined  area  to  provide  naturally 
appearing  configurations  that  blend  with  surrounding  features. 
These  procedures  should  provide  and  maintain  those  characteris- 
tics of  diverse  shoreline  configurations  and  profile,  bank  slope, 
and  water  depth  as  discussed  in  previous  operation  guidelines. 


80 

VII.  SITE  CLOSURE 


c.  Excess  unused  mined  material  should  be  used  to  form  islands 
or  vary  water  depths  within  the  pit 

d.  Fol low  work  plan  regarding  access  to  the  pit 

e.  The  outlet  channel,  if  provided  in  work  plan,  should  be  con- 
structed during  the  final  phases  of  site  closure.  Refer  to  Opera- 
tions Guidelines  for  design  criteria  (Section  V I  B  5c). 

3.  Specific  Guidelines  for  Dredged  Sites 

If  the  low-flow  buffer  was  disturbed,  return  it  to  its  natural  config- 
urat  ion  and  hei  ght 


VII.  SITE  CLOSURE 


Appendices 


Appendix  Page 


A.  FLOOD-FLOW  BUFFER  DESIGN  84 

B.  FIELD  INSPECTION: 

Desirable  Data,  Procedures  and 

Equipment 107 

C.  RIVER-TRAINING  STRUCTURES  AND  BANK 
PROTECTION  DEVICES  117 

D.  DESIGN  OF  PITS 127 

E.  FISH  PASSAGE  STRUCTURES 151 

F.  SETTLING  PONDS  AND  WASTEWATER 

TREATMENT 135 

G.  EFFECTS  OF  BLASTING  ON  AQUATIC 

ORGANISMS 139 

H.  STANDARD  FORMULA  AND  CONVERSION 

FACTORS 145 

I.  GLOSSARY 157 


APPENDIX  A 

FLOOD-FLOW  BUFFER  DESIGN 

INTRODUCTION 

Flood-flow  buffers  should  be  designed  to  prevent  the  diversion  of  an 

active  channel  through  the  material  site.  The  design  life  is  usually  some 

finite  period  ranging  from  5  years  for  some  scraped  sites  to  possibly  50  years 
or  more  for  some  pit  sites. 

The  recommended  design  procedure  is  to  consider  the  lateral  activity 
of  the  particular  river  based  on  its  channel  configuration  and  historical 
migration  pattern.  The  river  size,  soil  composition  of  the  buffer  material, 
vegetative  cover,  permafrost  banks,  and  channel  aufeis  are  also  important 
considerations  affecting  the  stability  of  the  buffer.  The  hydrology  of  the 
river  must  be  considered  to  evaluate  the  frequency  that  the  buffer  will  be 
flooded.  Each  of  these  are  discussed  in  more  detail  in  the  following  sections. 

BUFFER  WIDTH 

Lateral  Channel  Migration 

The  general  procedure  for  estimating  the  amount  of  channel  migration 
of  a  river  is  summarized  in  this  section.  The  user  is  referred  to  Brice  (1971) 
for  a  more  detailed  explanation  of  the  procedure.  Stereop lot ters,  when  avail- 
able, are  a  faster  and  more  accurate  means  of  estimating  lateral  migration. 
Additional  information  on  stereop lot ter  use  can  be  obtained  from  photogram- 
metry  textbooks,  photogrammetr ic  consultants,  or  stereop I ot ter  manufacturers' 
I  i  terature. 

Because  of  the  complexities  of  the  bank  erosion  process,  quantifying 
lateral  migration  usually  involves  the  use  of  historical  records.  These  are 
projected  based  on  a  knowledge  of  the  channel  configuration  and  other  con- 
siderations discussed  later.  Aerial  photographs  are  obtained  of  the  reach  of 


84 


river  being  studied  (generally  at  least  two  floodplain  widttis  upstream  and 
downstream  from  the  mined  site  location).  Photographic  coverage  is  desired  for 
as  many  years  as  are  available,  but  should  at  least  include  photos  20  or  more 
years  apart  for  the  evaluation  of  long-term  changes.  The  photos  can  be  repro- 
duced to  obtain  slides  as  described  by  Brice  (1971)  or  can  be  used  in  print 
form  as  described  below: 

I.  Enlarge  the  photos  to  the  same  scale,  whenever  possible.  Select  three 
or  more  identifiable  features  on  each  photo.  Place  an  overlay  over  one  photo 
and  mark  the  selected  features  on  the  overlay.  Place  the  overlay  over  the 
other  photo(s)  and  match  the  features  to  these  marks  to  verify  that  the  scale 
is  the  same.  If  the  scales  are  identical,  the  river  banks  can  be  traced  from 
each  photo  on  the  same  overlay  (Figure  A- I ) .  The  lateral  migration  can  be 
measured  directly  from  the  overlay.  If  the  scales  are  not  the  same,  the  follow- 
ing steps  are  necessary. 

2.  Select  two  identifiable  features  on  each  of  the  photos  and  connect 
these  to  form  a  baseline  (Figure  A-2).  These  features  should  be  located  near 
the  opposite  ends  of  the  photograph. 

5.  Subdivide  the  baseline  into  10  or  more  segments  and  draw  lines  perpen- 
dicular to  the  baseline  through  each  of  the  segment  endpoints,  extending 
the  line  through  the  area  for  which  the  lateral  migration  estimates  are  de- 
sired. Subdivide  one  of  these  lines  and  draw  lines  perpendicular  to  form  a 
grid  pattern  (Figure  A-5). 

4.  Prepare  a  similar  grid  to  any  desired  scale  on  a  sheet  of  paper. 
Transfer  bank  locations  at  each  grid  square  boundary  from  each  photo  to  the 
corresponding  grid  square  boundary  on  the  sheet  of  paper  (Figure  A-4).  The 
rows  and  columns  can  be  numbered  and/or  lettered  to  assist  in  the  coordination 
of  the  transfer. 

5.  Connect  the  points  on  the  paper  to  show  the  bank  positions  as  they 
appear  on  the  photos  (Figure  A-5).  The  smaller  the  grid  is  on  the  photos, 
the  more  accurate  the  bank  lines  will  be.  Lateral  migration  can  be  measured 
directly  from  this  figure. 


85 


Figure  A- I .  Schematic  of  overlay  showing  topographic  features 
used  as  match  points  and  bank  lines  from  1948  and  1978 
photographs. 


Small  grove  of  trees 
in  clearing — -y 


Point  of  terrace- 


Figure  A-2.  Schematic  showing  the  selection  of  features  to  use 
as  baseline  endpoint  for  a  portion  of  the  study  reach. 


86 


Grid 


Figure  A-3.  Schematic  showing  the  development  of  a  grid  on  each 
photo. 


The  accuracy  of  this  technique  is  sufficient  for  estimating  the  expected 
life  of  the  buffer  zone  or,  conversely,  the  required  width  of  the  buffer 
to  meet  the  design  life  expectations.  The  accuracy  of  the  average  annual 
migration  is  greater  for  longer  time  periods  between  photo  dates.  Brice  (1971) 
notes  that  the  accuracy  depends  on  the  original  scale  and  definition  of  the 
photos,  the  scale  of  the  enlargement,  the  degree  of  scale  distortion  in  the 
photo,  the  numbers  and  reliability  of  features  used  as  reference  points, 
and  the  care  used  in  matching.  It  is  generally  not  advisable  to  use  the  edge 
of  lakes  or  rivers  as  reference  match  points  or  as  bank  lines  for  migration 
estimates  because  of  the  variability  of  this  feature  with  water  level  changes. 

Channel  Configuration 

Channel  configuration  is  an  important  parameter  in  evaluating  the  poten- 
tial for  extending  past  records  into  the  future.  Each  configuration  is  dis- 
cussed separately  in  the  following  sections.  The  effects  of  buffer  height 
are  discussed  in  a  different  section. 

Braided  Configuration.  Braided  river  channels  are  often  very  active 
laterally  within  the  active  floodplain.  When  a  major  active  channel  is  flowing 
along  a  vegetated  cut  bank,  substantial  bank  erosion  can  take  place.  If  the 
major  channel  was  flowing  along  the  bank  during  the  entire  period  over  which 


87 


Figure  A-4.  Schematic  show 
to  the  paper  grid. 


ng  the  transfer  of  the  bank 


I  nes 


from  the  photos 


88 


Erosion 


Deposition 


Deposition 


Erosion 


Figure  A-5.  Completed  schematic  showing  bank 
lines  and  zones  of  erosion  and  deposition  from 
which  rates  of  erosion  can  be  measured. 


the  historical  migration  rates  were  estimated,  that  migration  rate  may  be 
projected  into  the  future.  Otherwise,  different  locations  on  the  floodplains 
should  be  selected  for  obtaining  estimates.  Any  change  in  the  alignment  of  the 
channel  should  be  accounted  for,  with  erosion  rates  increasing  for  increasing 
angles  of  the  channel  to  the  bank.  A  factor  of  safety  should  be  applied  to  the 
result,  its  value  depending  on  the  confidence  one  has  in  the  estimate  for  a 
given  system. 

As  a  hypothetical  example,  consider  the  length  of  bank  labeled  A  in 
Figure  A-6.  The  dashed  line  shows  the  channel  as  it  appeared  in  1950  and  the 
solid  line  represents  the  location  of  the  1975  river  channel.  Assume  that  the 
lateral  migration  of  bank  A  was  measured  to  be  100  m,  or  4  m  per  year.  Assume 
it  is  desired  to  have  a  buffer  lasting  at  least  8  years  to  protect  a  scraped 
gravel  removal  area  in  the  inactive  floodplain.  Projecting  the  past  into 
the  future  results  in  4  m  per  year  for  8  years,  or  32  m. 


89 


Figure  A-6.  Schematic  of  a  river  with  a  braided  configuration  with  the  1950 
and  1975  channel  locations  shown. 


•  The  1950  channel  alignment  was  at  a  larger  angle  to  the  bank  than  the 
1975  channel;  thus  it  Is  likely  that  the  erosion  rates  were  greater 
than  4  m  per  year  for  the  1950  alignment  and  less  than  4  m  per  year  for 
the  1975  alignment.  The  32  m  can  thus  be  reduced  slightly,  possibly  to 
28  m.  If  intermediate  photos  (between  1950  and  1975)  are  available, 
this  figure  can  be  substantiated  by  estimating  the  erosion  rate  for  the 
more  recent  time  period.  If  the  year  to  year  activity  of  the  active 
channels  is  relatively  low,  it  can  be  assumed  that  the  potential  for  a 
significant  change  in  alignment  is  low,  and  a  fairly  low  safety  factor 
can  be  used.  In  this  case,  a  safety  factor  of  1.5  applied  to  the  28  m 
value  would  result  in  a  buffer  width  of  42  m. 

•  If  the  active  channels  are  known  to  change  substantially  every  year, 
the  reduction  for  alignment  should  not  be  applied  and  a  safety  factor 


90 


of  2,0  or  more  could  be  used.  This  would  result  in  a  buffer  width  of  52 
m  X  2.0,  or  64  m. 

It  is  possible  to  find  a  braided  configuration  where  the  length  of  bank 
defining  the  buffer  is  not  adjacent  to  an  active  channel,  e.g.,  area  B  in 
Figure  A-6.  In  this  situation,  the  migration  rate  at  area  A  can  be  applied  to 
area  B  and  modified  for  various  considerations.  Assuming  an  8-year  life  is 
desired,  the  starting  width  is  32  m.  This  width  can  probably  be  reduced,  the 
amount  of  reduction  depending  on  the  annual  lateral  activity  level  of  the 
active  channels.  Assume  that  the  activity  level  is  low.  One  might  reduce  the 
number  to  24  m  in  that  situation.  However,  if  the  active  channel  does  shift, 
it  will  likely  impinge  on  the  bank  at  a  relatively  large  angle,  increasing 
erosion  potential.  As  a  result,  the  width  should  be  increased  to  36  m  instead 
of  decreased  to  24  m.  With  relatively  stable  channels,  the  safety  factor  can 
be  about  1.5  to  obtain  a  54-m  wide  buffer. 

Split  Configuration.  Rivers  with  split  channel  configurations  are  typ- 
ically much  more  laterally  stable  than  braided  rivers.  Thus,  a  historical 
record  of  erosion  rates  for  a  split  river  is  fairly  reliable  for  projecting 
future  erosion  rates.  Channel  alignment  with  respect  to  the  buffer  bank  is  an 
important  consideration,  with  larger  erosion  rates  expected  from  channels  with 
larger  angles  to  the  bank.  The  factor  of  safety  to  apply  to  buffers  on  rivers 
with  split  configurations  may  be  as  low  as  1.2;  the  factor  of  safety  would 
increase  with  increasing  channel  activity  and  with  decreasing  confidence  in 
the  buffer  width  estimate.  See  discussions  of  meandering  and  braided  config- 
urations for  hypothetical  examples  of  extending  historical  erosion  rates. 

Meandering  Configuration.  Rivers  with  meandering  configurations  typically 
experience  varying  degrees  of  lateral  migration,  but  the  location  and  direc- 
tion of  migration  is  fairly  predictable.  A  historical  record  of  erosion  rates 
for  a  meandering  system  can  be  used  to  predict  future  erosion  rates  with  a 
high  degree  of  reliability  relative  to  previous  configurations.  Channel  align- 
ment with  respect  to  an  eroding  bank  tends  to  remain  constant.  The  factor  of 
safety  to  apply  to  the  width  of  buffers  on  rivers  with  meandering  configura- 


91 


tions  may  be  as  low  as  1.2  with  a  good  data  base;  higher  values  should  be  used 
as  uncertainty  increases  in  estimating  the  erosion  rate. 

The  pattern  of  a  meandering  river  and  the  expected  zones  of  erosion  are 
illustrated  in  Figure  A-7.  Most  meandering  rivers  deviate  to  some  degree  from 


Figure  A-7.  Schematic  of  a  meandering  river  showing  the  expected  zones  of 
erosion  as  the  river  meanders  migrate  down  the  valley. 


92 


this  pattern,  but  the  basic  principles  are  the  same.  Weandering  rivers  exhibit 
a  general  tendency  to  migrate  downvalley  by  eroding  the  cut  bank  on  the  out- 
side of  a  bend  from  a  point  roughly  midway  through  the  bend  and  extending 
generally  to  the  beginning  of  the  inside  of  the  next  bend  downstream.  The 
gradual  downvalley  progression  of  the  bends  usually  remains  within  a  zone 
called  the  meander  belt  drawn  near  the  outside  of  each  meander.  The  width  of 
the  meander  belt  is  usually  constant  for  regular  meander  patterns.  Irregular 
meander  patterns  do  not  necessarily  maintain  a  constant  meander  belt  width, 
but  the  erosion  at  the  outside  of  bends  is  typical.  The  difference  between  a 
regular  meander  pattern  and  an  irregular  meander  pattern  and  the  expected 
zones  of  erosion  associated  with  each  is  shown  in  Figure  A-8.  It  is  apparent 


Regular  Meander  Pattern 


Irregular  Meander   Pattern 


Figure  A-8.  Schematics  of  regular  and  irregular  meander  patterns  and 
typical  erosion  zones. 


93 


from  the  location  of  the  typical  zones  of  erosion  that  the  buffer  width  should 
generally  be  greater  on  the  outsides  of  meanders  and  the  upstream  side  of  the 
insides  of  meanders. 

As  an  example,  consider  the  hypothetical  river  in  Figure  A-9  with  a 
regular  meander  pattern.  A  material  site  is  proposed  on  an  inside  meander  of  a 
small  river,  for  which  a  buffer  design  life  of  25  years  is  desired. 


Figure  A-9.  Schematic  of  a  river  with  a  regular 
meander  pattern  and  a  proposed  location  for  a 
mater  ia I  site. 


The  buffer  surrounding  the  material  site  is  separated  into  zones  A  and  B 
because  they  are  zones  of  different  expected  erosion  rates.  Historical  erosion 
rates  for  zone  A  were  90  m  between  1948  and  1978,  or  an  average  rate  of  5  m 
per  year.  In  zone  B,  270  m  of  deposition  has  taken  place  during  the  same 
period.  Starting  with  zone  B,  the  bank  opposite  this  zone  should  be  inves- 
tigated for  any  abnormality  such  as  near-surface  bedrock,  which  may  stop  the 


94 


erosion  of  this  bank.  If  there  is  such  an  abnormality,  the  buffer  width  should 
be  increased  from  the  standard  minimum  buffer  width  for  the  downstream  end  of 
the  site  given  in  Section  V  A  5b.  In  this  example,  assume  no  abnormality 
exists;  use  a  standard  minimum  buffer  width  increased  by  25  percent  to  account 
for  the  increased  design  life  (25  years  instead  of  20  years)  to  derive  a  19  m 
width  in  zone  B.  For  zone  A,  an  annual  migration  of  3  m  per  year  over  25  years 
would  prescribe  a  75-m  wide  buffer.  No  change  in  the  average  erosion  rate  is 
expected  from,  for  example,  a  meander  cutoff  developing  upstream,  and  the 
historical  period  is  longer  than  the  design  life,  thus,  the  user  can  feel 
confident  with  the  prediction.  A  safety  factor  of  1.2  can  be  used  resulting  in 
a  recommended  buffer  width  of  90  m. 

Sinuous  Conf  igurat  ion.  A  river  with  a  sinuous  channel  configuration  is 
expected  to  behave  in  a  similar  manner  to  that  of  the  meandering  rivers  with  a 
few  exceptions:  erosion  rates  are  often  less  in  sinuous  rivers  than  in  mean- 
dering rivers;  and  the  erosion  zone  may  extend  farther  upstream  on  the  outside 
of  a  sinuous  river  meander  (Figure  A-IO).  Otherwise,  similar  procedures  can  be 
used  to  estimate  the  recommended  buffer  zones.  Safety  factors  as  low  as  1.2 
can  be  applied  to  the  buffers  in  zones  of  erosion  on  these  relatively  stable 
rivers.  See  the  discussion  on  meandering  rivers  for  a  hypothetical  example  of 
estimating  buffer  sizes. 

Straight  Configuration.  A  river  with  a  straight  configuration  will  likely 
have  a  similar  erosion  pattern  to  that  of  sinuous  rivers,  only  less  pro- 
nounced. Straight  rivers  typically  exhibit  a  sinuous  pattern  in  their  thalweg 
with  the  inside  meanders  being  formed  by  alternate  bars  or  side  channel  bars. 
Thus,  what  little  bank  erosion  takes  place  in  a  straight  river  would  occur 
opposite  and  slightly  downstream  from  these  gravel  bars,  which  may  be  sub- 
merged under  most  flow  conditions  (Figure  A-ll).  Safety  factors  as  low  as  1.0 
may  be  appropriate  on  straight  rivers.  The  reason  for  the  straight  alignment 
should  be  considered  before  evaluating  the  buffer  requirements.  For  example, 
if  the  straight  reach  resulted  from  meander  cutoffs,  a  much  larger  buffer 
would  be  required  than  if  the  straight  reach  is  due  to  erosion  resistant 
banks. 


95 


Figure  A-IO,  Schematic  of  a  sinuous  river  showing 
typical  erosion  zones. 


Other  Buffer  Width  Factors 

River  Size.  In  general,  erosion  rates  increase  with  increasing  river 
size.  This  increase  is  primarily  due  to  the  greater  discharges  associated  with 
larger  river  size.  The  increase  is  also  due  to  the  wider  valley  floors  filled 
with  greater  quantities  of  generally  smaller  sized  alluvial  sediments.  The 
rate  of  increase  of  erosion  rates  with  river  size  is  difficult  to  quantify.  If 
historical  rates  of  lateral  migration  are  available,  river  size  does  not  have 
to  be  considered  separately. 

Soi I  Compos! t  ion.  The  soil  composition  of  the  bank  and  buffer  material  is 
Important  to  the  erosion  rate.  Fine  sands  are  generally  the  easiest  to  erode. 


96 


Figure  A- 1  I .  Schematic  of  a  straight  river 
showing  zones  of  potential  erosion. 


Larger  sized  granular  material  (such  as  coarse  sands,  gravels,  cobbles)  re- 
quire higher  velocities  to  be  eroded  because  of  the  increased  weight  of  the 
particles.  With  vertical  cut  banks,  large  diameter  materials  often  build  up  at 
the  base  of  the  bank.  This  build  up  is  because  the  finer  materials  holding 
them  in  place  are  eroded  away  while  the  larger  sized  materials  cannot  be 
transported.  Material  finer  than  fine  sands  (silts  and  clays)  are  often  more 
resistant  because  of  the  cohesion  between  particles. 

If  the  buffer  material  is  uniform  throughout,  then  historical  erosion 
rates  do  not  need  to  be  modified  for  soil  composition  effects.  If  there  are 
areas  of  significantly  finer  or  coarser  sized  materials,  the  historical  ero- 
sion rate  should  be  modified  accordingly  based  on  the  discussion  in  the  pre- 
ceeding  paragraph. 


97 


Vegetat  i  ve  Cover .  Vegetation  with  deep  root  structures  provides  a  resis- 
tance to  bank  erosion.  Dense  ground  cover  on  the  buffer  provides  an  increase 
in  the  roughness  of  the  buffer,  causing  a  decrease  in  the  velocity  of  flow 
over  the  buffer.  This,  in  turn,  reduces  the  potential  for  erosion  of  the 
buffer  surface  and  the  development  of  a  channel  through  the  buffer.  This  is  a 
primary  reason  why  a  buffer  should  not  be  disturbed. 

When  extending  historical  erosion  rates,  the  vegetative  pattern  should 
be  considered.  No  compensation  for  vegetation  is  required  if  the  vegetation  is 
comparable  between  the  buffer  and  the  area  that  eroded  during  the  period  of 
historical  erosion.  If  the  vegetation  type  or  density  changes  within  the 
buffer,  or  between  the  buffer  and  the  area  of  historical  erosion,  then  the 
historical  rate  of  erosion  should  be  modified  according  to  the  type  of  change 
and  the  discussion  in  the  preceeding  paragraph. 

Permafrost  Banks.  The  erosion  of  permafrost  banks  is  a  more  complicated 
process  than  unfrozen  bank  erosion.  Various  investigators  have  studied  the 
process;  some  have  concluded  that  permafrost  increases  bank  erosion,  others 
have  decided  that  permafrost  decreases  bank  erosion.  Scott  (1978)  reviewed 
previous  investigations  and  added  his  own  investigation  of  five  rivers  in 
arctic  Alaska.  He  concluded  that  the  net  effect  of  permafrost  is  to  create 
greater  channel  stability  than  is  found  in  rivers  of  similar  size  in  nonperma- 
frost  environments.  However,  banks  which  are  ice-rich  will  likely  have  less 
stability  and  higher  erosion  rates  than  other  permafrost  or  nonpermaf rost 
banks. 

When  using  past  records  to  predict  future  conditions,  the  thermal  con- 
dition of  the  banks  should  be  considered.  Past  thermal  conditions  of  the 
banks  are  generally  not  known,  consequently,  it  must  be  assumed  that  they  were 
similar  to  the  current  condition.  If  the  banks  are  ice-rich,  the  safety  factor 
applied  to  the  buffer  width  should  be  larger. 

Channel  Aufeis.  Aufeis  development  in  the  active  channel  of  a  river  can 
cause  a  larger  percentage  of  the  snowme I t  runoff  to  flow  across  the  buffer 
than  otherwise  would  be  expected.  Doyle  and  Childers  (1976)  show  a  photograph 


98 


of  this  occurring  at  the  Prospect  Creek  material  site  near  the  Trans-Alaska 
Pipeline.  This  increased  flow  can  cause  erosion  of  the  surface  of  the  buffer, 
especially  any  disturbed  area.  It  can  also  cause  scour  or  headcutting  in  the 
material  site  because  of  the  I arger-than-des i gn  flows  during  breakup.  The 
safety  factor  applied  to  buffer  width  should  be  increased  if  channel  aufeis  is 
known  to  develop  at  the  site. 

BUFFER  HEIGHT 

Buffer  height  and  buffer  width  are  interrelated  to  a  certain  degree. 
If  the  buffer  is  high  enough  to  keep  all  but  the  largest  of  floods  out  of 
the  material  site,  only  bank  erosion  needs  to  be  considered  in  buffer  design. 
This  may  be  the  situation  for  many  material  sites  located  on  terraces.  If  the 
buffer  is  low  and  is  flooded  frequently  by  larger  flows,  erosion  of  the  sur- 
face of  the  buffer,  headward  erosion  of  the  upstream  face  of  the  material 
site,  and  scour  within  the  site  must  be  considered  in  the  buffer  design.  The 
height  of  natural  buffers  is  fixed  at  the  level  provided  by  nature.  Design 
options  include  increasing  buffer  width  to  account  for  low  height,  building  up 
the  buffer  height  by  adding  a  dike  on  the  river  side,  or  building  a  completely 
separate  buffer  structure.  These  options  are  discussed  in  more  detail  in  a 
subsequent  paragraph. 

To  evaluate  the  frequency  of  flooding,  hydrologic  and  hydraulic  analyses 
must  be  carried  out.  The  details  of  these  analyses  are  too  complex  to  explain 
here,  but  appropriate  references  are  given  to  allow  the  user  to  study  the 
subject  further. 

•  A  hydraulic  analysis  is  required  to  evaluate  what  discharge  will  ini- 
tiate overtopping  of  the  buffer.  Cross  sections  of  the  river,  extending 
up  to  the  level  of  the  buffer  on  both  banks,  are  necessary  for  this 
analysis.  It  is  preferable  to  have  five  or  more  cross  sections  through 
the  reach  of  river  adjacent  to  the  buffer.  The  Manning  equation  or, 
perferably,  a  backwater  program,  should  be  used  to  calculate  the  dis- 
charge corresponding  to  the  stage  that  would  overtop  the  buffer.  Discus- 
sions of  these  analyses  are  provided  in  most  open-channel  hydraulics 


99 


textbooks  (Chow  1959),  and  in  other  references  (Bovee  and  Milhous  1978; 
U.  S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers  1976). 

•  A  flood  frequency  analysis  provides  an  estimate  of  the  recurrence 
interval  or  probability  of  exceedance  of  the  discharge  which  just 
overtops  the  buffer.  Detailed  discussion  of  flood  frequency  analyses 
are  included  in  most  hydrology  textbooks,  U.  S.  Water  Resources  Council 
(1977),  and  Lamke  (1979).  Lamke  (1979)  provides  equations  for  deter- 
mining flood  discharges  for  rivers  in  Alaska  for  the  following  recur- 
rence intervals  and  corresponding  exceedance  probabilities: 

Recurrence  interval        Exceedance  probability 
(years)  (%) 


I . 25  80 

2  50 

5  20 

10  10 

25  4 

50  2 


100 


With  the  discharge  and  its  frequency  of  occurrence  known,  the  probability 
of  that  flood  occurring  over  the  design  life  of  the  buffer  is  needed.  Table 
A- I  below  provides  the  probability  of  occurrence  of  a  flood  of  a  specified 
recurrence  interval  during  a  specified  buffer  design  life. 


100 


Table  A-l.   Probability  of  Occurrence   (%)  of  a  Specified  Flood  During 

a  Specified  Design  Life 


Flood  Buffer  design  life 

( years) 


Recurrence     Exceedance 
interval      probab  i I i  ty 
(years)  (%)  2    5    8    10   20   25   50    100 


1 . 

25 

80 

96 

99+ 

99- 

2 

50 

75 

97 

99 

5 

20 

56 

67 

85 

10 

10 

19 

41 

57 

25 

4 

8 

18 

28 

50 

2 

4 

10 

15 

100 

1 

2 

5 

8 

99+   99+   99+  99+  99+  99+  99+ 

99+   99+  99+  99+  99+  99+ 

89  99  99+  99+  99+ 

65  88  95  99  99+ 

54  56  64  87  98 

18  55  40  64  87 

10  18  22  59  65 


a  ^    J     „  ^  ^..-^   Design  Life 

Probability  of  Occurrence  =  I  -  (I  -  Exceedance  Probability) 


With  the  known  probability  of  flow  through  the  site  during  the  design 
life  of  the  buffer,  the  user  can  evaluate  the  consequences.  If  the  probability 
is  low,  the  width  of  the  buffer  can  be  designed  based  on  lateral  migration 
alone.  If  the  probability  is  high,  one  of  several  design  options  are  recom- 
mended. 

•  If  the  buffer  is  heavily  vegetated,  and  if  flow  through  the  material 
site  is  acceptable,  riprap  the  upstream  edge  of  the  material  site 
to  prevent  headward  erosion;  or,  increase  the  width  of  the  buffer  to 
allow  for  erosion  loss  (Figure  A- 1 2a). 


a  .  Heavily  vegetated  buffer  and  flow  through 
the  site  is  acceptable. 


b  .  Heavily  vegetated  buffer  and  flow  through 
the  site  is  unacceptable. 


c.  Lightly  vegetated  buffer  and  flow  through  d.  Highwater  or  abandoned  channel  through 

site  is  acceptable.  heavily  vegetated  buffer  and  flow  through 

site  Is  acceptable. 

Figure   A-12.    Schematic   of    recommended   options    if    the    probability   of    flow 
through    the   site    is    high. 


102 


•  If  the  buffer  Is  heavily  vegetated,  and  flow  through  the  site  is  unac- 
ceptable, construct  a  dike  surrounding  the  material  site  designed 

for  a  flood  with  an  acceptably  low  probability  of  occurrence  (Figure 
A- 1 2b). 

•  If  the  buffer  is  lightly  vegetated,  build  a  dike  along  the  river  side 
of  the  buffer  designed  for  a  flood  with  an  acceptably  low  probability 
of  occurrence  (Figure  A-I2c). 

•  If  the  buffer  contains  a  high-water  or  abandoned  channel,  build  a 
dike  along  the  river  side  of  the  buffer  to  keep  flow  out  of  the  chan- 
nel; the  dike  should  be  designed  for  a  flood  with  an  acceptably  low 
probability  of  occurrence  (Figure  A-I2d). 

As  an  example  of  buffer  height  design,  consider  the  material  site  loca- 
tion shown  in  Figure  A-15.  The  buffer  width  has  been  estimated  by  historical 


Cross 
Section  5 


Cross  Section  6 


Buffer  Width 
200  m 


^     y    /Pit 

Material 
Site 


Cross  Section  7- 


Figure  A-13.  Schematic  of  an  example  of  buffer  height  design. 


103 


erosion  techniques.  Cross  sections  are  surveyed  as  shown  (two  additional 
cross  sections  were  collected  further  downstream).  A  backwater  analysis  was 
run  to  find  that  discharges  of  103  m  /s  and  89  m  /s  overflowed  the  buffer  at 
Cross  Sections  3  and  7,  respectively.  A  flood  frequency  analysis  indicated 
that  these  discharges  had  recurrence  intervals  of  35  and  25  years.  The  design 
life  of  the  buffer  is  25  years.  Thus,  from  Table  A-l,  at  Cross  Section  7  there 
is  a  64  percent  chance  of  getting  flow  into  the  downstream  end  of  the  material 
site  within  the  25-year  life.  This  chance  is  acceptable  to  the  user  because 
the  flow  would  primarily  be  backwater  and  would  have  relatively  low  erosion 
potential.  At  Cross  Section  3  the  upstream  buffer  has  a  50  to  60  percent 
chance  of  overtopping  the  buffer.  The  user  finds  this  to  be  unacceptable,  but 
since  there  is  a  relatively  small  chance  of  substantial  flow  entering  the  pit 
from  the  upstream  side,  he  recommends  riprapping  the  upstream  bank  of  the  pit. 

REFERENCES 

Bovee,  K.  0.,  and  R.  T.  Milhous.   1978.   Hydraulic  Simulation  in  Instream  Flow 
Studies:  Theory  and  Techniques.  Instream  Flow  Information  Paper  No. 
5.  Cooperative  Instream  Flow  Service  Group.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service. 
Fort  Collins,  Colorado.  125  pp. 

Br  ice,  J.   1971.   Measurement  of  Lateral  Erosion  at  Proposed  River  Crossing 
Sites  of  the  Alaska  Pipeline.  U.S.  Geological  Survey.  Water  Resources 
Division.  Alaska  District.  39  pp. 

Chow,  V.  T.   1959.   Open-Channel  Hydraulics.  McGraw-Hill  Book  Company,  New 
York.  680  pp. 

Doyle,  P.  F.,  and  J.  M.  Childers.  1976.  Channel  Erosion  Surveys  Along  TAPS 
Route,  Alaska,  1976.  Open-File  Repor t-77-l 70  (Basic  Data).  U.S.  Geolog- 
ical Survey.  Anchorage,  Alaska.  90  pp. 

Lamke,  R.  0.   1979.   Flood  Characteristics  of  Alaskan  Streams.  Water  Resources 
Investigations  78-129.  U.S.  Geological  Survey.  Anchorage,  Alaska.  61  pp. 


104 


Scott,  K.  M.   1978.   Effects  of  Permafrost  on  Stream  Channel  Behavior  in 
Arctic  Alaska.  Professional  Paper  1068.  U.S.  Geological  Survey.  U.S. 
Government  Printing  Office,  Washington.  19  pp. 

U.  S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers.   1976.   HEC-2  Water  Surface  Profiles:  Users 

Manual.  Computer  Program  723-X6-L202A.  The  Hydrologic  Engineering  Center. 
Davis,  California.  17  pp.  +  Appendix. 

U.  S.  Water  Resources  Council.   1977.   Guidelines  for  Determining  Flood  Flow 
Frequency.  Bulletin  No.  I 7A  of  the  Hydrology  Committee.  Washington. 
26  pp.  +  14  Appendix. 


105 


APPENDIX  B 

FIELD  INSPECTION:  DESIRABLE  DATA, 
PROCEDURES,  AND  EQUIPMENT 

APPLICANT  SITE  PLANNING  FIELD  INSPECTION 

As  part  of  the  site  planning  process  the  applicant  is  recommended  to 
visit  the  proposed  site  or  alternate  sites,  or  both,  during  the  open-water 
season  to  gather  the  following  information: 

A.  Technical  data  to  substantiate  aerial  photographic  interpretation 
(e.g.,  sufficient  quantity  and  quality  of  material,  and  percent 

f  i  nes ) . 

B.  General  site  specific  biological  data  regarding  the  presence  of  areas 
or  species  of  special  concern  that  may  be  directly  influenced  should 
site  development  occur. 

C.  Site  specific  hydraulic  data  relevant  to  site  planning  and  agency 
review  (e.g.,  discharge,  stage,  and  cross  sections). 

D.  Ground  photographs  of  site  physical  and  biological  characteristics 
which  will  be  used  in  support  of  work  plan  development  and  submittal 
to  appropriate  agencies. 

E.  If  a  snow-covered  site  will  be  opened,  all  work  area  locations  should 
be  surveyed  during  the  open-water  site  visit.  This  survey  should  be 
from  reference  locations  that  can  be  located  during  site  opening. 
Boundaries,  such  as  those  of  active  channels,  buffer  locations,  vege- 
tated areas,  and  gravel  deposits,  can  then  be  accurately  relocated 
during  site  preparation.  This  will  reduce  the  potential  for  damage  to 
areas  that  should  not  be  disturbed. 


107 


F.  If  winter  active-channel  mining  is  contemplated,  an  adaitional  site 
visit  during  winter  should  be  conducted.  Its  purpose  is  to  determine 
the  presence  of  water  at  or  below  the  proposed  site. 

Field  Approach 

Material  Availability.  A  variety  of  techniques  are  available  to  evaluate 
grandular  materials  present  at  a  site.  These  include  borings,  test  pits,  and 
resistivity  measurements. 

Biological  Evaluation.  The  entire  site  should  be  walked  (during  which 
time  ground  photos  should  be  obtained)  to  subjectively  assess  the  overall  fish 
and  wildlife  habitat  quality  in  sufficient  detail  to  make  Decisions  I  through 
4  in  Section  I  B.  It  may  be  appropriate  to  make  this  a  combined  applicant- 
agency  site  visit. 

Hydraulic  Data.  Cross  Sections:  Cross  sections  of  the  river  channel (s) 
and  floodplain  should  be  surveyed  to  provide  input  to  the  hydraulic  analysis 
and  the  level  to  which  excavation  can  extend.  The  number,  location,  and  length 
of  the  cross  sections  should  be  based  on  the  following  criteria  (Figure  B-l): 

•  There  should  generally  be  at  least  five  cross  sections;  three  or  more 
would  generally  be  necessary  to  describe  the  site  and  one  or  more  would 
be  required  upstream  and  downstream  from  the  site. 

•  Cross  sections  through  the  site  should  be  located  at  the  upstream  and 
downstream  ends  as  well  as  one  or  more  in  between  to  define  the  extent 
of  mi  n  i  ng. 

•  In  addition  to  the  locations  necessary  to  define  the  site,  cross  sec- 
tions should  be  located  at  each  significant  change  in  floodplain  width. 

•  The  upstream  and  downstream  cross  sections  should  be  located  at  least 
two  active  channel-top  widths  from  the  upper  and  lower  limits  of  the 
material  sites  and  associated  buffers. 


108 


TBM1 


TBM2 


TBM3 


TBM4 


LEGEND 

n  Temporary 
^.  Bench  Mark 
CP  Cross  Section 
Number 


TBM5 


TBM  6 


TBM7 


aterial 
Site 


Thalweg 

Profile 

Alignment 


Figure  B- I .  Schematic  showing  cross  section  number  and  locations, 
temporary  bench  marks  and  thalweg  profile  at  a  hypothetical  material 
s  i  te. 


109 


•  The  length  of  the  cross  sections  should  include  the  entire  active 
floodplain  width  and  should  continue  to  an  elevation  on  both  ends 
equivalent  to  at  least  the  highest  point  in  the  material  site  or  the 
buffer,  whichever  is  greater. 

•  Cross  sections  should  be  aligned  perpendicular  to  the  direction  of  flow 
during  flood  events. 

•  The  distances  between  and  direction  of  the  cross  sections  should  also 
be  surveyed. 

The  surveys  should  be  performed  using  standard  surveying  techniques.  A  descrip- 
tion of  these  techniques  and  the  desired  accuracy  is  given  in  Bovee  and 
Mi Ihous  ( 1978) . 

Temporary  Bench  Marks:  Temporary  bench  marks  (TBMs)  should  be  placed  at 
one  end  of  each  of  the  cross  sections  and  one  near  the  active  channel  where 
the  discharge  measurements  are  taken  (Figure  B- I ) .  The  TBM  elevations  should 
be  tied  into  a  common  datum  (often  arbitrary  datum  at  the  upstream  cross 
section)  as  described  in  Bovee  and  Mi Ihous  (1978). 

Stage  and  Discharge:  The  stage  (water  surface  elevation)  should  be  re- 
corded at  the  time  the  discharge  measurements  are  taken.  Discharge  measure- 
ments should  not  be  taken  while  the  discharge  is  rapidly  changing.  Discharge 
measurements  should  be  taken  at  a  cross  section  in  a  relatively  uniform  chan- 
nel reach;  that  is,  the  water  surface  slope  and  bottom  slope  should  be  similar 
and  the  depth,  area,  velocity,  and  discharge  should  not  change  significantly 
through  the  reach.  Discharge  measurements  are  taken  by  measuring  the  total 
depth  and  the  velocity  at  specified  depths  at  25  to  30  stations  across  the 
ctiannel.  The  station  (distance  from  a  TBM)  should  also  be  recorded.  Velocity 
measurements  should  be  taken  at  the  following  recommended  depths  below  the 
water  surface  relative  to  the  total  depth  (d): 

-  0.2d,  0.6d,  and  0.8d  is  most  preferred 


no 


-  0.2d  and  0.8d  is  next  most  preferred 

-  0.6d  is  recommended  only  if  the  depth  (d)  is  less  than  0.75  m 

If  the  discharge  is  changing  rapidly  and  the  measurements  must  be  taken  at 

that  time,  the  0.6d  method  should  be  used  to  complete  the  measurements  faster. 

Additional  details  on  discharge  measurements  can  be  found  in  Bovee  and  Milhous 
(1978)  or  Buchanan  and  Somers  (1969). 

Bed  Material  Size  Distribution:  The  size  distribution  of  the  surface 
layer  of  bed  material  is  required  for  evaluating  the  hydraulic  roughness  of 
the  channel  and  floodplain.  These  data  are  obtained  by  an  analysis  of  photo- 
graphs using  a  grid-by-number  technique  as  described  by  Kellerhals  and  Bray 
(1971)  or  Adams  (1979).  The  photographs  should  be  tal<en,  vertically  downward, 
of  at  least  a  I  m  square  area  of  undisturbed  surface  layer  gravels.  A  scale 
should  be  included  in  the  photograph. 

Thalweg  Profile:  A  thalweg  profile  should  be  surveyed  of  the  channel  bed 
at  those  sites  where  the  material  site  is  being  proposed  on  a  gravel  bar 
adjacent  to  the  channel  or  in  the  channel  itself  (Figure  B- I ) .  These  data  are 
needed  in  the  determination  of  the  maximum  depth  to  which  gravel  can  be  ex- 
tracted. The  profile  should  extend  at  least  five  channel  widths  beyond  the 
ends  of  the  mined  site. 

Photographs.  Photographs  should  be  taken    to  show  the  main  habitat  fea- 
tures of  the  river  reach  being  studied  (e.g.,  riffles,  runs,  pools,  islands, 
gravel  bars,  riparian  shrub  thickets,  mud  flats,  backwater  areas,  incised  and 
undercut  banks).  If  possible,  photographs  should  be  taken  from  an  elevated 
vantage  point,  such  as  a  high  bank.  A  sequence  covering  the  entire  reach  of 
stream  is  desirable.  A  record  should  be  made  of  each  photograph,  including 
date,  time,  location,  direction  of  photograph,  sequence,  and  main  features 
being  photographed.  If  the  visit  is  a  follow-up  to  a  previous  field  visit, 
photographs  identical  to  those  obtained  previously  should  be  taken,  as  well  as 
those  showing  new  features.  If  a  winter  visit  occurs,  photograph  aufeis  and 
river  ice  characteristics. 


AGENCY  FIELD  INSPECTION 

The  initial  agency  field  inspection  is  recommended  to  verify  the  data 
supplied  by  the  applicant  and  to  gather  additional  environmental  data  at 
the  site  to  identify  the  significant  biological  habitats.  With  this  informa- 
tion, any  appropriate  work  plan  that  minimize  environmental  impacts  can  be 
recommended.  The  field  inspection  should  evaluate  the  overall  habitat  quality 
and  include  observations  on  site-specific  parameters  including: 

•  General  configuration  of  the  river. 

•  Channel  top  width  (size  of  river). 

•  Stage  and  discharge. 

•  Mean  ve I oc  i  t y . 

•  Bank  and  instream  cover. 

•  Substrate. 

•  Pool :riffle  ratio. 

•  Presence  of  sensitive  areas  (i.e.,  spawning  and  overwintering  areas). 

•  Dominant  terrestrial  habitats. 

Desirable  field  inspection  equipment  for  this  site  visit  includes: 

•  Devices  to  measure  water  depth  and  top  width. 

•  Device  to  measure  water  velocity. 

•  Data  sheets  of  field  book  for  recording  field  observations. 

•  35  mm  camera  with  color  slide  or  print  film. 

•  Dip  net . 

•  Binoculars. 

During  the  initial  field  visit  a  site  sketch  should  be  prepared  perferably 
using  a  copy  of  the  aerial  photo  supplied  with  the  work  plan.  This  sketch 
should  identify  major  aquatic  and  terrestrial  habitat  locations  and  configura- 
tions in  relation  to  the  boundaries  and  configuration  of  the  work  area,  and 
locations  of  special  features  such  as  settling  basins,  stockpiles,  access 
points,  and  others. 


112 


Subsequent  agency  visits  (during  site  operation  and  site  closure)  should 
measure  the  same  parameters  and  document  habitat  alterations. 

Field  Techniques 

Observations.  Record  and  numerate  all  fish  and  wildlife  encountered  in 
each  habitat  type. 

Stream  Velocity.  Stream  velocity  can  be  estimated  by  placing  a  biodegrad- 
able object  with  a  density  slightly  less  then  that  of  water  (such  as  an  orange 
or  lemon),  in  the  river  and  recording  the  time  required  to  travel  between  two 
measured  points.  Express  the  measurement  in  feet  or  meters  per  second. 

Bank  and  Instream  Cover.  Bank  and  instream  cover  can  be  expressed  as 
percent  of  total  cover  and  percent  by  each  category.  Categories  for  which 
available  habitat  should  be  assessed  include: 

•  Banks  -  undercut  bank,  overhanging  bank  vegetation,  and  near-surface 
(submerged  and  emergent)  bank  vegetation. 

•  Instream  -  boulders,  logs,  large  debris,  and  other  velocity  bar- 
r  iers. 

•  Depth  -  water  depth  acting  as  cover  such  as  deep  pools  and  runs. 

Substrate.  Estimate  the  percent  of  substrate  composed  of  the  different 
particle  sizes  according  to  the  modified  Wentworth  scale  supplied  in  Appendix 
H.  Separate  by  pool  and  riffle. 

Photographs.  Photographs  should  be  obtained  to  show  the  main  habitat 
features  of  the  river  reach  being  studied  (e.g.,  riffles,  runs,  pools, 
islands,  gravel  bars,  riparian  shrub  thickets,  mud  flats,  backwater  areas, 
incised  and  undercut  banks).  If  possible,  photographs  should  be  collected  from 
an  elevated  vantage  point,  such  as  a  high  bank.  A  sequence  covering  the  entire 
reach  of  stream  is  desirable.  A  record  should  be  made  of  each  photograph. 


I  13 


including  date,  time,  location,  direction  of  photograpti,  sequence,  and  main 
features.  Photographs  identical  to  those  obtained  previously  should  be  taken, 
as  well  as  those  showing  new  features  if  the  visit  is  a  follow-up  to  a  pre- 
V  i  ous  field  visit. 

Riparian  Zones.  These  areas  provide  primary  feeding,  nesting,  and  cover 
habitat  for  passerines  and  small  and  medium  sized  mammals.  During  winter 
they  also  provide  primary  overwintering  habitat  for  moose  and  ptarmigan. 
Areas  that  consist  of  advanced  or  mature  sera!  stages,  generally  have  well- 
developed  ground  cover,  shrub  layer  or  overstory  cover,  or  both,  (in  Northern 
and  Southern  Interior  regions)  that  provide  desirable  habitat.  Sites  that 
contain  riparian  zones  with  high  diversity  of  cover  types  (herbaceous  marsh, 
mature  shrub  thickets,  mixed  shrub  thicket-early  overstory  forest  and  over- 
story  forest)  may  be  considered  more  desirable  than  sites  containing  riparian 
zones  of  homogeneous  cover  types.  Watch  for  indicators  of  past  activity 
levels:  old  passerine  nests,  small  mammal  runways  and  burrows,  red  squirrel 
feeding  posts,  moose  browse,  and  moose  and  ptarmigan  droppings  in  over- 
wintering areas. 

Water  Bird  Habitat.  Feeding,  nesting,  and  cover  habitat  for  waterfowl, 
shorebirds,  terns,  and  gulls  should  also  be  assessed.  Determine  availability 
of,  and  if  possible  utilization  level  of: 

•  Backwater  areas,  mud  flats,  and  littoral  areas  as  feeding  habitat  by 
shorebirds,  terns,  and  waterfowl. 

•  Pools  and  side-channels  as  feeding  habitat  by  terns,  gulls,  and  water- 
fowl. 

•  Open  and  sparsely  vegetated  gravel  bars  as  nesting  habitat  by  gulls, 
terns,  and  shorebirds  (most  frequently,  semipalmated  plovers,  ruddy 
turnstones,  spotted  sandpipers). 

•  Herbaceous  riparian  zones  as  nesting  habitat  by  waterfowl  and  shore- 
b  irds. 


114 


Sites  with  a  diversity  of  water  bird  habitats  are  more  desirable  than 
sites  with  only  one  or  two  types  present. 

REFERENCES 

Adams,  J.   1979.   Gravel  size  analysis  from  photographs,  pp.  1247-1255.  In 

ASCE,  J.  Hydraulics  Div.  Proc.  Paper  14908,  Vol.  105,  No.  HYIO,  October. 

Bovee,  K.  D.,  and  R.  T.  Milhous.   1978.   Hydraulic  Simulation  in  Instream  Flow 
Studies:  Theory  and  Techniques.  Instream  Flow  Information  Paper  No.  5. 
Cooperative  Instream  Flow  Service  Group,  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service,  Fort 
Collins,  Colorado.  125  pp. 

Buchanan,  T.  J.,  and  W.  P.  Somers.   1969.   Discharge  Measurements  at  Gaging 
Stations,  65  pp.  In  Techniques  of  Water-Resources  Investigations  of  the 
U.S.  Geological  Survey,  Book  3,  Applications  of  Hydraulics.  U.  S.  Govern- 
ment Printing  Office,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Kellerhals,  R.,  and  D.  I.  Bray.   1971.   Sampling  procedures  for  coarse  fluvial 
sediments,  pp.  I  165-1  180.  _l_n  ASCE,  J.  Hydraulics  Div.  Proc.  Paper  8279, 
Vol .  97,  No.  HYB,  August. 


15 


APPENDIX  C 

RIVER-TRAINING  STRUCTURES  AND 

BANK  PROTECTION  DEVICES  ; 

INTRODUCTION 

River-training  structures  and  bank  protection  devices  may  be  required 
during  gravel  removal  operations  or  site  closure,  or  both.  Their  purposes  can 
include  protection  of  the  site  from  flow  during  operation  or  after  closure 
and  reduction  of  the  potential  for  downstream  siltation.  River-training 
structures  also  may  be  used  to  protect  the  bank  of  a  buffer  from  excessive 
erosion.  River-training  structures  and  bank  protection  devices  generally 
should  not  be  used  unless  absolutely  necessary  because  they  usually  disrupt 
natural  river  processes,  often  resulting  in  scour  and  erosion  elsewhere  in 
the  system.  In  addition,  bank  protection  devices  can  alter  banks  and  their 
adjacent  riparian  zones. 

Revetments  constitute  the  major  group  bank  protection  devices.  River- 
training  structures  in  gravel  removal  operations  primarly  consist  of  dikes; 
other  types  of  these  structures  include  retards,  guide  banks,  spurs,  and 
jetties.  Several  publications  are  available  that  discuss  the  design  of  such 
structures;  these  include  California  Division  of  Highways  {I960);  Karaki  et 
al.  (1974);  Neil  I  (1973);  U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers  (1970)  and  Winkley 
(1971).  The  following  paragraphs  discuss  briefly  dikes  and  revetments. 


DIKES 


Dikes  are  long  embankments  used  to  control  the  overflow  of  water  into 
the  material  site.  Dikes  may  be  constructed  along  an  active  channel  or  across 
a  high-water  channel,  or  both.  Dikes  may  also  be  used  to  block  active  side 
channels  in  those  cases  where  the  bed  is  to  be  scraped.  For  these  purposes, 
the  dikes  should  be  impermeable,  high  enough  to  prevent  overtopping,  and 
protected  from  erosion.  Impermeable  dikes  are  often  constructed  of  stone  or 
earth,  or  both. 


I  17 


The  design  of  dikes  should  include  consideration  of  the  following 
(Figure  C- I ) . 


Continue  ends  of 
dike  beyond  flood 
Tlimits 


Riprap 
2:1  Slopes 


^      Design  Flow 


Low  Summer 
Flow — 1 


Low- Flow  Buffer 


SECTION   A-A 


Figure  C-l.  Dike  design  considerations. 

•  Side  slopes  should  be  stable  and  riprapped  to  withstand  the  flood  for 
which  they  are  being  designed  (generally  2:1  slope  is  recommended;  see 
revetment  design  discussion). 

•  Top  width  is  controlled  by  the  requirements  of  the  equipment  con- 
structing the  dike. 

•  The  ends  of  the  dike  should  be  located  and  designed  to  keep  water  from 
flowing  around  them. 

•  The  top  of  the  dike  should  be  at  an  elevation  equal  to  that  of  the 
water  surface  of  the  design  flow;  this  water  surface  profile  should  be 
determined  using  a  hydraulic  backwater  analysis. 


18 


•  Dikes  should  be  built  beyond  the  limits  of  the  low-flow  buffer. 

BANK  PROTECTION  BY  REVETMENTS 

A  revetment  is  a  layer  of  erosion  resistant  material  placed  on  a  bank 
or  embankment  to  armor  against  erosion.  Methods  and  materials  for  revetments 
other  than  riprap  are  available  but  are  not  discussed  here  because  they 
generally  are  unacceptable  for  environmental  reasons. 

Riprap 

The  most  common  form  of  revetment  is  riprap,  a  layer  of  rock  which 
may  be  dumped,  hand-placed,  or  grouted.  Dumped  rock  riprap  is  most  commonly 
used,  although  grouted  rock  riprap  may  be  applicable  if  the  available  ma- 
terial is  not  large  enough  to  meet  the  requirements  of  dumped  riprap.  Rock- 
filled  wire  baskets  (gabions)  may  also  be  used  when  available  materials  are 
of  insufficient  size  to  meet  dumped  riprap  requirements.  There  are  several 
factors  important  in  the  design  of  dumped  rock  riprap;  these  include: 

•  Shape,  size,  and  gradation  of  the  rock. 

•  Density  and  durability  of  the  rock. 

•  Velocity  and  depth  of  flow  near  the  rock. 

•  Steepness  of  the  slope  being  protected. 

•  Thickness  of  the  riprap  layer. 

•  Filter  blanket  presence  and  design. 

•  End  and  toe  protection. 

These  factors  are  discussed  briefly  in  the  following  sections. 

Shape,  Size,  and  Gradation.  The  shape,  size,  and  gradation  of  the  rock 
riprap  are  the  primary  properties  in  resisting  erosion.  The  shape  should  be 
angular  to  provide  an  interlocking  of  the  rocks.  Large  rock  is  more  erosion 
resistant  than  small  rock.  Selection  of  the  proper  rock  size  is  a  complex 
function  of  flow  characteristics  and  slope  of  the  embankment  being  protected. 
Karaki  et  al.  (1974)  present  a  method  for  estimating  rock  size.  Nei  I  I  (1973) 


19 


presents  a  graph  to  use  as  a  guide  in  selecting  riprap  size  (Figure  C-2). 


ai 
z 
o 

&5 


CO 

z 
< 

CO 

< 


o 
o 


—       6' 


* 

z'' 

/> 

y 

3 

y 

/ 

-.' 

y 

/' 

/^ 

/ 

^1 

^ 

f 

y 

e 

/ 

'b) 

y 

y 

.•^ 

/ 

/ 

0 

y 

^' 

1 
/ 

^ 

y 
^ 

y 

4 

/ 

* 

^ 
y 

^ 
X 

'9 

'/y 

f 

i^. 

// 

"/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/> 

1/ 

1 

f— ^ 

^ 

0     100    300    500    700    900    1100 

EQUIVALANT  SPHERICAL  DIAMETER   OF 
STONE   I  mm) 


CURVE 


SPECIFIED 
STONE  SIZE 
%PINER 

D33 


^50 
D40 
D65 


Ocallf.Hgws. 

©Bur  Public  Rds 

©Bur  of  Reclamn. 

©Corps  of  Engrs 

©  Recommended  Curve    D50 
fo'  a  Guide  (Neill,  1973) 


Assumed  stone  specific  gravity  =  2.65 


BANK  SLOPE 

2   1 

2.1 

not  given 
not  given 
horizontal  to  2  1 


Figure  C-2.  Graph  of  riprap  size  vs.  local  flow  velocity 
(modified  from  Neill  1973). 


It  should  be  used  with  caution  because  not  all  aspects  are  incorporated. 
Well-graded  material  improves  the  interlocking  of  the  rock  and  reduces  spaces 
between  rocks.  A  recommended  gradation  is  shown  in  Figure  C-3. 

Density  and  Durability.  The  rock  used  for  riprap  should  be  hard,  dense, 
and  durable  to  withstand  cycles  of  wetting  and  drying,  and  freezing  and 
thawing.  These  cycles  can  cause  cracking  of  the  rock,  resulting  in  reduction 
of  size  and  erosion  resistance.  Density  and  durability  are  generally  deter- 
mined by  laboratory  tests. 


120 


0) 
c  ^ 

c  a; 
a3  >. 


100- 
90- 

80- 
70- 
60 
50 
40 
30 
20 
10 
0 


Dcn=  Median  Riprap  Diameter 


■'50 


0.1  D. 


50 


0.5D, 
Sieve  Size 


'50 


-"50 


2C^ 


Figure  C-3.  Suggested  gradation  for  riprap  (after  Karaki  et  al.  1974) 


Velocity  and  Deptti  of  Flow.  A  primary  factor  influencing  erosion  is 
ttie  local  velocity  of  ttie  flow.  Direct  flow  measurements  are  recommended, 
but  these  may  be  difficult  to  obtain  during  flood  events.  In  the  absence 
of  measured  data,  Neil  I  (1973)  reconmends  the  local  velocity  against  a  slope 
be  taken  as: 

•  Two  thirds  of  the  average  velocity  in  straight  reaches. 

•  Four  thirds  of  the  average  velocity  in  severe  bends. 

The  shear  stress  on  the  rock  riprap  is  proportional  to  the  depth  of  flow 
above  the  riprap.  Thus  the  rock  size  should  increase  with  increasing  depth. 

Steepness  of  Slope.  The  stability  of  riprap  revetment  decreases  with 
increasing  steepness  of  slope.  The  steepest  slope  on  which  riprap  will  rest 
without  flow  forces  is  the  angle  of  repose  of  the  material,  which  is  gen- 
erally between  35  and  45  degrees.  Flow  against  the  rock  will  decrease  the 
angle  of  stability.  It  is  recommended  that  slopes  of  2:1  (2  horizontal  to  I 
vertical)  be  used.  Slopes  steeper  than  1,5:1  generally  should  not  be  used. 


121 


Thickness  of  Riprap.  The  thickness  of  the  riprap  should  be  sufficient 
to  provide  the  desired  protection  of  the  slope.  The  minimum  thickness  should 
be  equal  to  the  longest  dimension  of  the  largest  rock  or  be  50  percent  larger 
than  the  median  rock  size,  whichever  is  larger.  This  minimum  thickness  should 
be  increased  by  50  percent  if: 

•  Wave  action  is  possible. 

•  Gradation  is  not  as  recommended. 

•  Riprap  is  to  be  placed  in  flowing  water. 

•  A  filter  is  not  used  when  recommended. 

Filter  Blankets.  A  filter  blanket  may  be  recommended  for  placement 
beneath  the  rock  riprap  layer  to  prevent  the  loss  of  bank  material  through 
the  voids  in  the  riprap.  If  the  material  washes  out,  cavities  will  form 
beneath  the  riprap  and  failure  of  the  riprap  revetment  can  occur.  The  require- 
ments for  a  filter  depend  on  the  size  and  gradation  of  the  bank  material  and 
on  the  voids  in  the  riprap  layer.  If  the  composition  of  the  bank  material  is 
such  that  it  is  easily  eroded,  a  filter  layer  is  generally  recommended. 
Poor  riprap  gradation  is  also  a  reason  to  recommend  a  filter.  Filters  may 
be  well-graded  gravel  or  a  synthetic  filter  cloth. 

Gravel  filters  should  use  gravels  ranging  from  about  5  mm  to  90  mm 
(Karaki  et  al.  1974).  Filter  thickness  should  be  no  less  than  0.15  m;  filter 
thickness  equal  to  half  the  riprap  thickness  is  recommended.  More  than  one 
layer,  of  different  gradation  and  median  size,  should  be  considered  if  there 
is  a  very  large  difference  in  size  between  the  bank  material  and  the  riprap 
rock.  Recommended  guidelines  for  gradation  of  the  filter  are  given  by  Karaki 
et  al.  (1974);  they  are  summarized  in  relations  below. 

These  relations  should  be  applied  to  each  layer  in  turn,  starting  with 
the  bank  material  as  the  fine  material  and  using  the  needed  filter  material 
as  the  coarse.  The  first  filter  selected  then  becomes  the  fine  material  for 
the  next  filter  layer  computation.  After  determining  the  size  and  gradation 
of  each  filter,  these  relations  should  be  used  with  the  last  selected  filter 


122 


as  the  fine  material  and  the  riprap  as  the  coarse  material.  If  the  results 
are  within  the  indicated  limits,  an  additional  filter  layer  is  not  needed. 


D-.  (coarse) 
50 


D^^  (fine) 
50 


<  40 


D,^  (coarse)    .^ 
5    15  <  40 


D.^  (fine) 
I  5 


D,^  (coarse) 
15  <   5 


D    (fine) 


Where  D    is  median  diameter,  D    is  the  diameter  particle  of  which  15  per- 
cent of  the  material  is  finer,  and  D    is  the  diameter  particle  of  which 
85  percent  of  the  material  is  finer.  An  example  of  filter  gradation  design 
is  given  in  Figure  C-4. 

Filter  cloths  have  been  used  with  success  for  more  than  a  decade.  They 
can  support  large  riprap  material  with  no  damage  to  the  cloth.  A  disadvan- 
tage of  filter  cloths  is  that  the  riprap  must  be  placed  with  care  to  prevent 
damage  to  the  cloth. 

End  and  Toe  Protection.  The  ends  of  the  riprap  revetment  along  the 
channel  may  be  subject  to  erosion.  The  erosion  could  remove  material  from 
behind  the  riprap  and  cause  failure  of  the  riprap.  Extending  the  riprap 
revetment  to  areas  not  having  erosive  velocities  is  a  recommended  end  protec- 
tion (Figure  C-5a).  If  this  is  not  possible,  the  thickness  of  the  riprap 
layer  should  be  increased  to  twice  that  otherwise  needed.  This  extra  thick- 
ness should  be  placed  in  a  recess  cut  into  the  bank  to  maintain  a  uniform 
riprap  face  (Figure  C-5b). 


123 


GIVEN: 


Riprap 
Filter  2 
Filter  1 
Embankment 


EMBANKMENT 

RIP-RAP 

Di5(mm) 
D5o(mm) 
D85(mm) 

0.10 
0.20 
0.50 

300 
500 
800 

STEP  1:  FILTER  1  GRADATION  DESIGN 

D5o(FiLTER  1 )  <  40  X  D50 (EMBANKMENT)  =  8mm 

0.5mm  =  5x  Di5(EMBANKMENT)  <    D,5(FILTER1)  <40  x  Di5{EMBANKMENT)  =  4mm 

Di5(FILTER  1)  <  5  X  Das  (EMBANKMENT)  =  2.5mm 
SELECT  Di5  =  1 .5mm,  D50  =  3.0mm,  Dgs  -  6.0mm 

STEP  2:  FILTER  2  GRADATION  DESIGN 

D5o(FILTER  2)    <40  x  D5o(FILTER  1)  =  120mm 
7.5mm  =  5xDi5(FILTER1)    <  D,5(FILTER2)    <40x  D,5(FILTER  1)  =  60mm 

D,5(FILTER 2)   <5  x  D85(FILTER  1)  =  30mm 
SELECT  Di5  =  20mm,  D50  =  40mm,  Dgs  =  80mm 

STEP  3:  CHECK  FILTER  2  DESIGN  AGAINST  RIP-RAP 

DsolRIP-RAP)    <40xD5o(FILTER2) 


5xDi5(FILTER2)< 
100mm  < 


500mm 
Di5(RIP-RAP) 

300mm 
Di5(RIP-RAP) 

300mm 


<  1600mm  ^  OK 
<40xDi5(FILTER2) 

<  800mm  ^  OK 
^5xD85(FILTER2) 

< 400mm  ^  OK 


STEP  4:  SUMMARY 

ACCEPTABLE  FILTER  GRADATION  DESIGN  TABLE: 

FILTER  1 
Di5(mm)  1.5 

D5o(mm)  3.0 

D85(mm)  6.0 


FILTER  2 
20 
40 
80 


Figure  C-4.  Example  of  filter  gradation  design. 


124 


a 


Figure  C-5.  Schematic  showing  plan  view  of  end  protection  configurations: 
a)  extension  out  of  the  zone  of  erosion  with  a  potential  reduction  in  thick- 
ness, and  b)  increasing  the  thickness  at  the  ends  of  the  revetment. 


The  base  of  the  riprap  revetment  can  be  undercut  by  scour  of  the  bed 
if  the  toe  is  not  protected.  Extending  the  riprap  layer  below  the  level 
of  the  bed  and  backfilling  is  recommended  (Figure  C-6a).  If  this  cannot 
be  done,  the  riprap  layer  should  be  continued  on  the  channel  bed  with  an 
increased  thickness  to  provide  material  to  fill  any  scour  holes  that  de- 
velop, thus  preventing  the  scour  from  undercutting  the  riprap  (Figure  C-6bl 


125 


Riprap 


Backfill   to  Original 
Bed 


•Thickness  Depends  on  Potential 
for  Scour 


Figure  C-6.  Schematic  showing  cross  section  of  toe  protection  configurations: 
a)  extension  of  the  riprap  below  the  dry  bed  and  backfilling,  and  b)  place- 
ment of  extra  material  along  the  bed  to  launch  itself  into  developing  scour 
holes. 

REFERENCES 


California  Division  of  Highways.   I960.   Bank  and  Shore  Protection  in 

California  Highway  Practice.  Sacramento:  Documents  Section,  State  of 
Ca I i  f or n  i  a . 

Karaki,  S.,  K.  Mahmood,  E.  V.  Richardson,  D.  B.  Simons,  and  M.  A.  Stevens. 
1974.   Highways  in  the  River  Environment,  Hydraulic  and  Environmental 
Design  Considerations.  Prepared  for  the  U.  S.  Federal  Highway  Adminis- 
tration. 

Neill,  C.  R.,  ed.   1975.   Guide  to  Bridge  Hydraulics.  Published  for  Roads  and 
Transportation  Association  of  Canada,  by  Univ.  of  Toronto  Press.  191  pp. 

U.  S.  Corps  of  Engineers.   1970.   Hydraulic  Design  of  Flood  Control  Channels, 
Engineering  and  Design.  Manual  No.  EM- I  I  10-2- I  60  I . 

Winkley,  B.  R.   1971.   Practical  Aspects  of  River  Regulation  and  Control, 

In:  River  Mechanics,  Vol.  I.  Hsien  Wen  Shen,  ed. ,  Prof,  of  Civil  Eng., 
Colorado  State  University. 


126 


APPENDIX  D 
DESIGN  OF  PITS 

There  are  two  basic  designs  to  consider  when  mining  floodplain  gravel  by 
pit  excavation:  pit  not  connected,  or  pit  connected  to  an  active  channel.  A 
properly  designed  unconnected  pit  can  provide  waterfowl,  shorebird,  and  amphib- 
ious mammal  habitat.  If  the  pit  is  connected  to  the  active  channel,  the  pit 
can  also  provide  fish  habitat.  The  outlet  channel  of  the  connected  pit  allows 
fish  that  become  trapped  in  the  pit  during  high  water  to  emigrate  from  the  pit 
at  any  time.  If  the  pit  is  unconnected,  it  should  be  protected  from  the  20- 
year  flood.  Fish  trapped  during  these  floods  are  considered  lost  from  the 
r  i ver  popu I  at  i  on. 

SHAPE  AND  DEPTH 

The  desired  configuration  for  a  gravel  pit  excavated  in  an  inactive 
floodplain  or  terrace  is  long  and  narrow,  in  the  shape  of  a  channel,  with  a 
variety  of  depths  (Figure  D- I ) .  If  the  pit  is  connected  to  the  river  or  fish 
are  to  be  stocked  in  the  pit,  the  mean  depth  should  be  greater  than  2.5  m  to 
allow  fish  survival  during  winter.  For  a  pit  with  a  configuration  as  shown  in 
Figure  D- I ,  the  following  are  two  examples  of  depth  regimes  that  will  result 
in  a  mean  depth  of  2.5  m: 

A.  For  a  minimum  mean  depth  with  a  minimum  of  littoral  area 

Mean  of  depth  Percent  of 

interva I  (m)  pit  area 


0, 

.5 

1, 

.5 

2, 

.5 

3, 

.5 

4, 

.5 

25 
10 
10 
50 
5 


AAaximum   depth:    5  m 
Mean    depth:    2.5   m 


127 


"iiJ^^r^       ■•wfl^'^ 


0) 

c 
c 

ID 

o 
> 


o 

(D 


T3 
0) 

U 
0) 

c 
c 
o 
o 


<u 
> 

(0 

V. 

en 


a> 


c 
O 

y 


(0 

i. 

c 
« 

a> 

I. 

U) 

o 


I 

o 

0) 

I. 

3 

en 


128 


B.  For  a  minimum  mean  depth  with  a  maximum  littoral  area 


Mean  of  depth  Percent  of 

interval  (m)  pit  area 


0.5  35 

1.5  10 

2.5  10 

3.5  15 

4.5  25 

5.5  5 


Maximum  depth:  6.0  m 
Mean  depth:  2.5  m 


A  pit  with  greater  littoral  area  generally  allows  greater  productivity 
and  is  preferred  for  waterfowl,  shorebirds,  and  fish.  In  both  of  the  above 
examples  an  increased  mean  depth  will  decrease  the  probability  of  fish  winter 
mortality.  If  more  gravel  is  required,  increasing  depth  is  preferred  over 
increasing  the  surface  area  of  disturbance. 

METHOD  FOR  CALCULATING  MEAN  DEPTH  OF  P I T 

To  obtain  an  estimate  of  the  mean  depth  of  a  designed  pit,  the  following 
procedures  can  be  used. 

A.  Determine  the  l-m  (or  other  unit  of  measure)  contour  intervals  for  the 
pit. 


B.  Determine  the  percent  of  surface  area(s)  consisting  of  a  particular 
l-m  depth  interval  [i.e.,  0-1  =  0.35; 
where  n  =  number  of  depth  intervals], 


l-m  depth  interval  [i.e.,  0-1  =  0.35;  1-2  =  0.10; ;(n-l)-n  =  s  , 


129 


C.  Multiply  the  midpoint  of  each  l-m  depth  interval  (d)  by  the  percentage 
of  area  composed  of  that  interval  [(i.e.,  d  x  s  =  (0.5)  (0.35);  (1.5) 
(0. 10) ,. .. , (d  ) (s  ) ]. 

0.  Wean  depth  =  sum  of  all  products  in  C.  [i.e.,  mean  depth  =  r  ds  = 

(0.5)(0.55)  +  (I.5)(0.I0)  +  ...  +  (d  )(S  ]. 

n    n 

The  Table  below  contains  example  calculations  of  mean  depth  of  the  pit 
shown  in  Figure  D-l.  The  letters  refer  to  the  four  steps  listed  above. 


Contour 
i  nter va I 
(m) 


Surface  area 


( ha  or 
other  unit) 


(%) 


Wi  dpoi  nt 

of  contour 

i  nterva I 

(m) 


Product  of 
midpoint  and 
percentage  area 

(m) 


0-1 
1-2 
2-3 
3-4 
4-5 

Total 


1.28 

33 

0.5 

0.64 

17 

1.5 

0.52 

14 

2.5 

1  .08 

28 

3.5 

0.30 

8 

4.5 

3.82 


100 


0.  17 
0.26 
0.35 
0.98 
0.36 

2.12=  mean  depth 


130 


APPENDIX  E 


FISH  PASSAGE  STRUCTURES 


PROVIDING  FOR  FISH  PASSAGE  OR  CULVERT  GUIDELINES 

Fish  passage  structures  should  be  provided  when  it  is  necessary  to  cross 
drainages.  Bridges  are  preferable  for  fish  passage;  however,  they  are  often 
economically  unfeasible  because  of  the  short  projtct  life  and  remoteness  of 
most  floodptain  gravel  removal  operations.  If  mature  timber  is  available, 
it  may  be  used  for  effective  and  economical  log  culverts.  Metal  culverts, 
although  generally  undesireable  in  temporary  roads,  are  usually  utilized,  but 
must  be  installed  properly  to  provide  adequate  fish  passage.  The  following 
guidelines  on  fish  passage  structures  are  a  synopsis  of  those  developed  by 
Dryden  and  Stein  (1975)  and  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  (1979)  for  the 
protection  of  fish  resources.  The  former  document  presents  guidelines  to  be 
considered  in  Northwest  Territories  road  design  while  the  latter  deals  specif- 
ically with  how  to  properly  design  fish  passage  structures  in  Alaska  roadway 
drainages.  Refer  to  these  documents  for  more  detail  and  specifics. 

Hydro  logical  Design 

Structure  Velocities. 

A.  In  general,  the  average  velocity  should  not  exceed  0.9  m/s  during  fish 
migration  periods.  Many  species  require  velocities  considerably  less 
than  this  during  migration  periods  and  fish  passage  can  be  impeded  at 
velocities  of  0.3  m/s  (Figure  E-l). 

B.  A  3-day  delay  period  (3  days  of  velocities  in  excess  of  those  required 
for  passage)  should  not  be  exceeded  during  the  mean  annual  flood 
(2.33-year  recurrence  interval  flood).  A  7-day  delay  period  should  not 
be  exceeded  in  the  design  flood. 


151 


WATER  VELOCITY  (cm/sec) 


Figure  E-l.  The  relationship  between  fish  fork  length  and  ability  to  move 
100  m  against  water  velocities  of  0-80  cm/sec  in  10  min.  The  same  curves 
may  also  be  used  to  indicate  the  ability  to  make  progress  against  these 
currents  over  shorter  distances.  For  instance,  to  cross  a  50-m  barrier  in 
10  min  the  curves  should  be  shifted  8  cm/sec  to  the  right;  to  cross  a  25-m 
barrier  in  10  min  the  curves  should  be  shifted  12  cm/sec  to  the  right.  The 
line  for  char  is  derived  from  the  hypothetical  equation  V  =  17  L°*'  and 
represents  the  measured  value  in  these  experiments  (from  Jones  1975). 


132 


Minimum  Water  Level .  The  water  level  in  the  culvert  should  not  be  less 
than  20  cm  during  the  open-water  season  unless  fish  passage  is  not  required. 

Structure  Design 

Shape. 

A.  If  suitable  timber  is  available,  native  log  stringer  or  rough-sawed 
timber  bridges  and  log  culverts  are  the  most  desirable  temporary 
structures  for  the  passage  of  fish.  They  maintain  the  natural  stream 
bed  and  gradient  and  are  easy  to  remove. 

B.  Arch  culverts  with  an  open  bottom  are  preferred  culverts  for  permanent 
roads.  These  culverts  retain  natural  bed  material.  Closed  arch  cul- 
verts are  second  in  preference. 

C.  Horizontal  ellipse  culverts  can  maintain  stream  flow  width  and  natural 
bed  material  if  the  culvert  invert  is  placed  below  the  stream  bed 

e levat  ion. 

D.  Circular  culverts  are  impractical  for  fish  passage  unless  installed 
as  described  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  (1979),  summarized  in 
the  following  section. 

Installation  and  Design. 

A.  Culvert  inverts  should  be  laid  a  minimum  of  15  cm  below  normal  stream 
bed  elevation.  The  Alaska  State  Pipeline  Coordinator's  Office  often 
recommends  a  burial  depth  of  20%  of  culvert  diameter. 

B.  Inverts  should  be  designed  to  prevent  hydrostatic  uplift  at  the  down- 
stream or  upstream  end. 

C.  The  culvert  gradient  should  be  kept  as  close  to  0%  gradient  as  pos- 
sible so  that  upstream  or  downstream  velocity  barriers  are  not 
created. 


133 


Capacity.  Culverts  should  tiave  sufficient  capacity  to  pass  the  design 
flood  with  no  backwatering  or  ponding  at  the  upstream  end. 

Location. 

A.  Culverts  should  not  be  placed  where  a  channel  cutoff  or  diversion 
will  resu I t . 

B.  The  culvert  should  be  placed  so  that  its  discharge  is  not  directed 
at  an  unstable  bank. 

Multiple  Culverts.  A  1.8  m  spacing  should  be  present  between  adjacent 
culvert  walls.  This  will  provide  a  downstream  backwater  area  for  fish  to  rest 
in  before  attempting  passage. 

REFERENCES 

Dryden,  R.  L.,  and  J.  N.  Stein.   1975.   Guidelines  for  the  Protection  of  the 
Fish  Resources  of  the  Northwest  Territories  During  Highway  Construction 
and  Operation:  Environment  Canada.  Fisheries  and  Marine  Service  Tech. 
Rept.  SeriesNo.  CEN/T-75-l.  52  pp. 

Jones,  D.  R.   1975.   An  Evaluation  of  the  Swimming  Performance  of  Several  Fish 
Species  from  the  MacKenzie  River.  Dept.  Environment,  Fisheries 
and  Marine  Service,  Winnipeg,  Man.  53  pp. 

U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture.   1979.   Roadway  Drainage  Guide  for  Installing 

Culverts  to  Accommodate  Fish.  Engineering  and  Aviation  Management  Div- 
ision, Forest  Service.  Alaska  Region  Report  No.  42.  121  pp. 


134 


APPENDIX  F 

SETTLING  PONDS  AND  WASTEWATER  TREATMENT 

WASTEWATER  TREATMENT 

The  Federa I -St ate  effluent  guidelines  indicate  that  total  suspended 
solids  (TSS)  is  the  main  effluent  parameter  that  must  be  monitored  during 
mining  and  processing  of  construction  sand  and  gravel  (Hall  and  Kosakowski 
1976).  The  present  EPA  requirement  is  that  the  TSS  of  a  gravel  mining  effluent 
should  not  exceed  50  mg/Jl  at  any  time.  In  order  to  accomplish  this  final 
concentration,  a  series  of  settling  ponds  and  often  a  coagulant  are  normally 
required.  Specific  needs  will  vary  according  to  the  amount  of  washing  neces- 
sary and  the  soil  characteristics  of  the  material.  In  a  washing  operation, 
wash  water  can  usually  be  recycled  without  need  for  discharge.  In  this  case 
the  amount  of  settling  required  will  depend  on  the  need  of  the  operator  for 
clean  water.  Generally,  recycled  water  with  a  TSS  of  less  than  200  mg/e,  is 
suitable  for  reuse. 

Specific  details  on  how  to  design  and  operate  settling  ponds  are  dis- 
cussed in  Monroe  (1973)  and  this  document  should  be  referenced  if  additional 
information  is  needed.  Following  is  a  brief  synopsis  of  his  major  recommenda- 
t  ions. 

Settling  Ponds  -  pond  with  an  outlet 

A.  Used  to  clarify  water  for  reuse  or  effluent  discharge. 

B.  Cross-sectional  area  of  the  pond  must  be  large  so  horizontal  velocity 
is  very  slow. 

C.  Water  must  enter  pond  over  most  of  the  width  to  make  the  entire  pond 
effective  (e.g.,  to  avoid  short  circuiting,  channel  formation). 


35 


D.  The  outlet  must  be  wide  to  skim  off  the  top  clear  water  and  maintain  a 
low  horizontal  velocity. 

Filter  Ponds  -  pond  without  an  outlet 

A.  Used  where  there  is  no  discharge  or  recirculation, 

B.  Water  table  must  be  low  enough  that  water  will  filter  out,  not  into 
the  pond.  Pond  berms  must  be  high  enough  to  guard  against  floods. 

C.  Walls  and  bottom  of  the  pond  must  be  porous  to  allow  outflow.  Ponds 
seal  more  slowly  if  they  are  kept  full  so  all  the  area  of  walls  and 
bottom  are  working. 

D.  Pond  must  be  large  enough  so  ii  will  not  seal. 

E.  Coagulants  should  not  be  used  in  filter  ponds  because  they  shorten  the 
life  of  these  ponds. 

F.  It  is  best  to  precede  the  filter  pond  with  a  settling  pond  for  heavy 
particle  settlement. 

Coagu lat  ion 

A.  Used  when  there  is  a  high  concentration  of  solids  that  will  not  settle 
or  there  is  limited  area  for  settling  ponds,  or  both. 

B.  Must  be  thoroughly  mixed  to  be  efficient. 

C.  Works  better  in  warm  water;  settlement  rate  is  doubled  for  every 
35  C  increase  in  temperature. 

D.  Commonly  used  coagulants  are:  aluminum  sulphate  (alum),  ferrous  sul- 
phate (copperas),  calcium  hydroxide  (hydrated  lime),  calcium  oxide 
(quick  lime),  sodium  aluminate,  sodium  carbonate  (soda  ash),  ferric 
chloride  (ferrisul),  sodium  silicate. 


136 


E.  Multipond  arrangement  may  be  most  suitable. 

F.  Coagulant  should  be  added  to  the  water  at  inlet  to  each  pond. 

REFERENCES 

Hall,  E.  P.,  and  M.  W.  Kosakowski.   1976.   Mineral  Mining  and  Processing 

Industry.  Development  Document  for  Interim  Final  Effluent  Limitations 
Guidelines  and  Standards  of  Performance.  Environmental  Protection  Agency, 
Effluent  Guidelines  Division,  Office  of  Water  and  Hazardous  Materials. 
Wash. ,  D.  C.  452  pp. 

Monroe,  R.  G.   1973.   Wastewater  Treatment  Studies  in  Aggregate  and  Concrete 
Production.  Environmental  Protection  Technology  Series  EPA-R2-73-003. 
Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Office  of  Research  and  Monitoring, 
Washington,  D.  C.  108  pp. 


137 


APPENDIX  G 

EFFECTS  OF  BLASTING  ON  AQUATIC  ORGANISMS 

Although  infrequently  required  on  floodplain  sites,  blasting  may  be 
utilized  during  certain  phases  of  gravel  removal.  Teleki  and  Chamberlain 
(1978)  developed  a  series  of  curves  and  equations  to  estimate  the  fatality 
radius  of  a  particular  charge  (based  on  an  explosive  with  a  detonation  veloc- 
ity of  4940-5490  m/s)  in  relation  to  certain  types  of  fish  (Figure  G- I ) . 

A  number  of  studies  have  evaluated  the  effects  of  blasting  on  a  particu- 
lar organism  or  groups  of  organisms.  Table  G- I  summarizes  the  results  of  some 
of  these  studies  and  indicates  the  range  of  sensitivities  shown  by  aquatic 
organisms  to  pressure  changes. 

The  force  generated  by  a  particular  charge  can  be  determined  at  various 
distances  by  referring  to  Table  G-2. 

REFERENCES 

Alpin,  J.  A.   1947.   The  effect  of  explosives  on  marine  life.  Calif.  Fish  and 
Game  53( I ) : 23-27. 

Baxter,  R.  E.   1971.   Effects  of  Explosives  Detonated  in  Ice  on  Northern  Pike, 
Kuskokwim  River,  1970.  Alaska  Dept.  Fish  and  Game  Info.  Leaflet  154. 
18  pp. 

Falk,  M.  R. ,  and  M.  J.  Lawrence.  1973.  Seismic  Exploration:  It's  Nature  and 
Effect  on  Fish.  Fish  and  Maine  Service  Central  Region.  Tech.  Rept.  Series 
No.  CEN/T  73-9. 

Hanson,  H.   1954.   Fur  seal  control  program,  Copper  River  and  Bering  River 
area.  Alaska  Dept.  of  Fisheries. 


159 


Hubbs,  C.  L.,  and  A.  B.  Rechnitzer.   1952.   Report  on  experiment  designed  to 
determine  effects  of  underwater  explosions  on  fish  life.  Calif.  Fish  and 
Game  38(5) : 333-566. 

Rasmussen,  B.   1967.   The  Effect  of  Underwater  Explosions  on  Marine  Life. 
Bergen,  Norway.  17  pp. 

Teleki,  G.  C,  and  A.  J.  Chamberlain.   1978.   Acute  effects  of  underwater  con- 
struction blasting  on  fishes  in  Long  Point  Bay,  Lake  Erie.  J.  Fish  Res. 
Bd.  Canada  35: I I9I-I 198. 

U.  S.  Navy.   1970.   U.  S.  Navy  Diving  Manual.  NAVSHIPS  0994-001-9010. 


140 


E 

DC 


Q 
< 
CC 


< 


li 


T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 [ 

280  20  100  200  280 


120-1 
100- 
80- 
60- 
40- 
20- 


III 


>95% 


— 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

20  100  200  280 


IV 


—I — I — I — I — I — I — I — ! — I — I — r 

20  100  200 


MAXIMUM     EXPLOSIVE  WEIGHT   PER    CHARGE    kg ' 


T 1 

280 


Figure  G-l.  Relationship  of  kil ogram  per  charge  to  fatality  radii  (FR): 
A  =  10-20%  mortal  ity,  B  =  95%  mortal  ity. 


I  =  physoc I  i St i c ,  high  lateral  compression  (pumpkin  seed,  crappie,  white 
bass )  . 
II  =  physoc I  i st i c,  moderate  lateral  compression  (rock  bass,  smallmouth  bass, 

ye  I  I ow  perch  )  . 
Ill,  IV  =  physostomic,  f us  i  form  (IN  =  quillback,  white  sucker,  yellow 

bullhead;  IV  =  rainbow  trout)  (from  Teleki  and  Chamberlain  1978). 

Equat  ions  (From  Teleki  and  Chamberlain  1978) 

I  A:  log  FR  =  1.2423  +  0.3340 
IB:  Log  FR  =  0.8814  +  0.3390 

lA:  Log  FR  =  1.3540  +  0.3337 
IB:  Log  FR  =  0.9087  +  0.3323 

lA:  Log  FR  =  0.9261  +  0.3344 
IB:  Log  FR  =  0.8199  +  0.3429 

VA:  Log  FR  =  0.8465  +  0.3382 
VB:  Log  FR  =  0.7297  +  0.3624 


og  kg 
og  kg 

og  kg 
og  kg 

og  kg 
og  kg 

og  kg 
og  kg 


141 


it) 

E 


CD 

I. 

o 


a 

cr 
< 

■o 
dj 

o 
<b 

01 
(/5 


in 

i- 

D 
I/) 
V) 
<D 
\- 
CL 

Ol 

C 


13 
I/) 


o 

c 
<u 

0) 
**- 
0) 


d) 
> 

in 
o 

Q- 
X 

a> 

SI 


u 

0) 


in 

3 

O 

ro 

ID 

in 

> 

0)     ID 

u    o 

^ 

u    in 

■*" 

O     ID 

s 

U-     Q- 

o 

O) 

~ 

c 

^ 

~ 

— 

in 

ro 

I 


(D 


E 
U) 

c 

10 
CD 

I. 

o 


(N 

in 

a 

r-- 

i- 

o\ 

<u 

— 

N 

.«_ 

Q) 

r- 

.— 

O 

r- 

\~- 

1^ 

o 

C 

C 

yD 

VO 

« 

0\ 

^ 

0) 

O 

o\ 

o\ 

— 

o 

— 

I- 

■<t 

— 

— 

— 

01 

r^ 

s 

in 

r~ 

c 

cc 

0> 

ID 

o\ 

Tt 

c 

c 

c 

01 

_ 

_l 

— 

Ov 

OJ 

0) 

0) 

in 

•a 

in 

in 

in 

in 

4- 

•e 

c 

in 

in 

in 

3 

in 

<a 

o 

c 

3 

3 

3 

e 

JO 

^ 

in 

E 

E 

E 

in 

n 

X 

— 

c 

Q. 

in 

in 

in 

ID 

3 

ID 

ID 

ID 

— 

ID 

ID 

ID 

ct 

X 

CE 

Ll. 

X 

< 

cc 

ct 

ce 

■D 

<0 

■o 

4_ 

0)    >~ 

u 

I-  -^ 

lU 

3    — 

»4- 

C     ID 


<D 


lD(OIDIDIDCl_IDU>- 

j:^jrr:^30^iD  — 

_J_J_I_I_J—     5—1     0)  Q) 

<U    O  I. 

cr>  _i         o  CD 
I-               z 

<0  *- 


lO  -tt 
<N   CN 


O  <o  r- 


in  ^  •^ 
<N  r^  r~- 


lO   fO  On 
iTl   —    ^O 


HI 
■D 
T3 


0) 

ID 

(0 

— 

■o 

£> 

>. 

c 

k_ 

o 

CD 

<D 

O) 

l- 

O 

c 

0 

v> 

•— 

u 

1- 

s 

\- 

<a 

\. 

— 

■o 

>- 

<a 

k. 

— 

■D 

k. 

JZ 

<1) 

(D 

E 

ID 

**- 

•0 

■D 
10 

in 

i3 

en 

c 

c 

— 

■D 

I. 

— 

o 

i3 

c 

u 

E 

ID 

ID 

k_ 

I. 

DJ 

01 

n 

J£ 

O 

*- 

Si 

in 

ID 

Q- 

U 

in 

3 
O 

-o 

sz 

^ 

— 

^ 

JD 

c 

4- 

^- 

C 

o 

— 

■♦- 

ID 

10 

c 

— 

I. 

ID 

•— 

k. 

o 

s 

lU 

o 

HI 

i. 

4. 

O 

Q- 

c 

E 

^ 

in 

<U 

E 

o 

a 

■*- 

■^. 

^ 

«- 

HI 

E 

X 

in 

I. 

o 

k. 

<n 

in 

3 

k. 

•— 

•— 

o 

k. 

3 

.— 

>- 

— 

r. 

ID 

CO 

u. 

z 

< 

Ll- 

Ll 

o 

CD 

to 

CO 

o 

in 


ir\ 

I 

m 


o 
o 


(U 

> 


c 
O 


ID 

C 

O 

OJ 

o 


X 

0) 

E 

o 
k- 
■o 
>. 

X 


c 


in 

ID 


0) 

o 

c 
<u 
k. 
<u 

**- 
0) 


ID 

x: 


in    in 
in    ID 


E 
in 

c 

ID 

a> 

k. 
o 


00 

in 

r~- 

— 

C31 

— 

c 

c 

o 

(D 

in 

— 

E 

1- 

in 

<U 

•— 

JD 

c 

E 

ID 

ID 

CD 

^ 

k. 

U 

O 

•e 

- 



ID 

jt 

<u 

k. 

— 

O 

Q) 

»*- 

Q)     — 

k.     XD 

3    -1- 

^^ 

in  — 

in 

in  — 

— 

4)     ID 

ID 

k.  *- 

U 

O-    k. 

in 

0>    f^    00 

1    1^    1 

1     1    ^    1 

1    O  O 

0 

ID 

»o  r^  00 

r~ 

r~ 

o  in 

-    E 

Q. 

—  — 

(D 

O 

*-   S5 

— 

ID  in 

— 

li.   o 

J£ 

oooo\OiriinK^iOK>i<^mr~ 


in         E 
in         3 

ID  k. 

■D  "D  x:  ^  'O 

0)  10  o 

Q)  in  x:  k.  ^  k. 

in  in   in  Q)  4-  - 

ID  CL    3     in    4- 

C     Q)    i3    "O  O 

-  —         1-    5    E 

^     Q.    0)     (0     O    — 

Q.    Q-  4-     N    — 

E 

3 


•D 
ID 

Q)  4- 

k.    ^  3 

Q)    —  O 

_            ^    —  k. 

in   <u  jt   o   3  ■•- 

o    3  n 

10   ID   ID   in  s 

n    S  n         5  O 

^  —    fl)    O  n 

^    in  —  -i-  —  c 


ID   —     N   —     ID     O     Q)   .-   —    —    . 


Ql   u 


k-XI—     Q)EOk_3X:Q)ID 


ovcoccu-osvceu 


x: 
o 

c 


HI 

k. 

10 
3 
cr 
in 

k. 
<u 

Cl. 

m 

T3 

c 

3 

o 

Q. 

«3 
0\ 
00 


10 
O 

in 
<o 

Q. 

O 


0) 

c 
o 


142 


c 


CD 

c 


(0 

c 
o 

0) 

o 


D 

10(0 

(U 

,^ 

a: 

1— 

z 

(D 

1- 

10 
(0 

1. 
0 

05 

<U 

>^ 

(J 

c 

U 

in 
> 


(/) 


(V 

■*-      Q. 
X 


(D 


O 
(0 
(0 
O. 
O 


0) 
O 

I. 

o 


CM 
I 


i3 

(0 


O 
01 


c 


O) 

o 

E 

Jt 

rO 

0 

— 

I. 

in 

0) 

en 

> 

c 

.— 

.— 

in 

4- 

0 

O 



— 

CM 

3 

O- 

in 

X 

0) 

0) 

I. 

ID 
U 

in 
ro 

Q. 

O 


o 

I. 
o 


e 

o 

c 

;. 

o 

»*- 

•  — 

in 

in 

O 

3 

— 

— 

Ol 

■o 

X 

(0 

0) 

ct 

■^Osmr-CNiri\or~-r<-\oo 

po  r~  00  •<*  CN  —  — 
tt  — 


■^  0\  CN  in  a> 

•«t    CN    CNI    — 


•^l-   K-l  lO  K^  r-4  —   — 
r<-\  — 


intN    —    lO^OCN    — 

moirir~-co  —  0^»o 
r-  —  in  CN  —  — 
CN  — 


ODtocNio  —  CMinr- 
incM  —  mr~ocDin 
in  o  in  CN  —  — 

CM   — 


'tOincNinfnr^cNC^  —  roincNooin 
cNK^iorAino\r--inK^fOCN  —  — 

K^   C3N   ^   CN   — 

CM 


OCNiOrAin—  ooinTtr-O'tor-- 

rO    —    OOK^CDIO'^K^CNCN    —    — 

O    CO    rt    (N    — 

CM 


CO  lO  in  K^  r-~ 
in  Tj-  ro  CN  — 


lO   (^   03    OD    •st    CTi   vo 
•*    K-\    CM 


ho  't  lo  r-  ro  cji  in 
«*  ro  CN  —  — 


—  in  CN  —  r~ 

—  Tj-    (N   lO    O 
lO   VO    rO   —   — 


rt'<*lOr~    —    lO—    00 
lO   in   PA   CN   CN   —    — 


oiCNiocoin  —  K~\oo  —  r-K^CTi>OTt 
r~-  —  incNOOin^cNCN  —  — 

CN   in   CN   — 


CNr^CDTtrOOD    —    —    VOPOCJilOintnCN 
^r~00(7iiOr<-iK>CN  —  — 
Ol   rO   — 


00CTiOinooinr~-CNOi^ 
^0\inr-intocN  —  —  — 

I^    CN   — 


in  Tt  CN  — 


CNinOininomoin 
CN  to  •<*  >o  1^ 


o  o  o  o  o 
o  in  o  o  o 
—  —  CN  lo  in 


o 

c^ 


> 

to 


E 

o 


0) 


T3 
O 


143 


APPENDIX  H 


STANDARD  FORMULA  AND  CONVERSION  FACTORS 


CONTINUITY  OF  FLOW 


^^  =  V2 


where     0  =  discharge 


A  =  cross  sectional  area  of  the  flow  at  I 

V  =  mean  flow  velocity  at  I 

A  =  cross  sectional  area  of  the  flow  at  2 

V  =  mean  flow  velocity  at  2 


VELOCITY  OF  CULVERT  FLOW 


Culvert  Flowing  Full  (Outlet  Control) 


A 


where     V  =  mean  flow  velocity  in  culvert 
0  =  discharge  through  culvert 
A  =  cross  sectional  area  of  culvert 

Cross  sectional  areas  of  plate  steel  arch,  pipe-arch,  and  circular  culverts 
of  various  sizes  are  listed  in  Tables  H-l,  H-2,  and  H-5.  Estimates  of  cross 
sectional  areas  of  circular  culverts  whose  inverts  are  buried  below  the  stream 
bed  can  be  obtained  from  Tables  H-l  or  H-2,  using  measured  or  estimated  span 
and  r  i  se  va I ues. 

Culvert  Flowing  Partially  Full  (Inlet  Control) 

Outlet  velocity  may  be  approximated  by  computing  the  mean  velocity  for  the 
culvert  cross  section  using  Manning's  equation.  Manning's  equation  can  be 
wr  i  t  ten : 

145 


Table  H- I .   Cross-Sectional  Area  of  Plate  Steel  Arch  Culverts 


Span 


ft- in 


Rise 


ft- in 


Cross-Sectional  Area 
m"  ft^ 


1.83 

6-0 

0.70 

2-?.h 

0.93 

10 

2.13 

7-0 

0.86 

2-10 

1.39 

15 

2.44 

8-0 

1.02 

3-4 

1.86 

20 

2.74 

9-0 

1.18 

3-1 0^2 

2.46 

2655 

3.05 

10-0 

1.35 

4-5 

3.16 

34 

3.35 

11-0 

1.36 

4-5?s 

3.44 

37 

3.66 

12-0 

1.52 

5-0 

4.18 

45 

3.96 

13-0 

1.55 

5-1 

4.55 

49 

4.27 

14-0 

1.70 

5-7 

5.39 

58 

4.57 

15-0 

2.01 

6-7 

6.97 

75 

4.88 

16-0 

2.16 

7-1 

7.99 

86 

5.18 

17-0 

2.18 

7-2 

8.55 

92 

5.49 

18-0 

2.34 

7-8 

9.66 

104 

5.79 

19-0 

2.49 

8-2 

10.96 

118 

6.10 

20-0 

2.53 

8-3^5 

11.52 

124 

6.40 

21-0 

2.69 

8-10 

13.01 

140 

6.71 

22-0 

2.72 

8-11 

13.56 

146 

7.01 

23-0 

3.00 

9-10 

15.89 

171 

7.32 

24-0 

3.15 

10-4 

17.47 

188 

7.62 

25-0 

3.31 

10-lOis 

19.23 

207 

7.62 

25-0 

3.81 

12-6 

22.95 

247 

146 


Table  H-2.   Cross-Sectional  Area  of  Pipe-Arch  Culverts 


Span 

Rise 

Cross- 

-Sectional  Area 

m 

ft- in 

m 

ft-in 

m^ 

ft^ 

0.46 

1-6 

0.28 

0-11 

0.10 

1.1 

0.63 

2-1 

0.41 

1-4 

0.20 

2.2 

0.91 

3-0 

0.56 

1-10 

0.41 

4.4 

1.27 

4-2 

0.79 

2-7 

0.81 

8.7 

1.47 

4-10 

0.91 

3-0 

1.06 

11.4 

1.65 

5-5 

1.02 

3-4 

1.33 

14.3 

1.85 

6-1 

1.40 

4-7 

2.04 

22 

2.13 

7-0 

1.55 

5-1 

2.60 

28 

2.41 

7-11 

1.70 

5-7 

3.25 

35 

2.69 

8-10 

1.85 

6-1 

3.99 

43 

2.97 

9-9 

2.01 

6-7 

4.83 

52 

3.25 

10-8 

2.11 

6-11 

5.39 

58 

3.53 

11-7 

2.26 

7-5 

6.22 

67 

3.81 

12-6 

2.41 

7-11 

7.25 

78 

4.09 

13-5 

2.57 

8-5 

8.27 

89 

4.34 

14-3 

2.72 

8-11 

9.38 

101 

4.67 

15-4 

2.82 

9-3 

10.13 

109 

5.00 

16-5 

3.02 

9-11 

11.71 

126 

5.03 

16-6 

3.35 

11-0 

13.29 

143 

5.31 

17-5 

3.51 

11-6 

14.68 

158 

5.66 

18-7 

3.66 

12-0 

16.17 

174 

5.94 

19-6 

3.81 

12-7 

17.65 

190 

6.27 

20-7 

4.01 

13-2 

19.88 

214 

147 


Table  H-3.   Cross-Sectional  Area  of  Circular  Culverts 


Inside  Diameter 


m 


ft-in 


Cross-sectional 

area 

tn^ 

ft^ 

0.074 

0.8 

0.17 

1.8 

0.29 

3.1 

0.49 

5.3 

0.66 

7.1 

0.89 

9.6 

1.17 

12.6 

1.48 

15.9 

1.82 

19.6 

2.63 

28.3 

3.58 

38.5 

4.67 

50.3 

5.91 

63.6 

7.29 

78.5 

8.83 

95.0 

10.51 

113.1 

12.33 

132.7 

14.30 

153.9 

16.42 

176.7 

18.68 

201.1 

21.09 

227.0 

23.64 

254.5 

26.34 

283.5 

29.19 

314.2 

0.30 

1-0 

0.46 

1-6 

0.61 

2-0 

0.76 

2-6 

0.91 

3-0 

1.07 

3-6 

1.22 

4-0 

1.37 

4-6 

1.52 

5-0 

1.83 

6-0 

2.13 

7-0 

2.44 

8-0 

2.74 

9-0 

3.05 

10-0 

3.35 

11-0 

3.66 

12-0 

3.96 

13-0 

4.27 

14-0 

4.57 

15-0 

4.88 

16-0 

5.18 

17-0 

5.49 

18-0 

5.79 

19-0 

6.10 

20-0 

148 


n 
where     V  =  mean  flow  velocity  in  culvert  (m/s) 
n  =  Manning  roughness  coefficient 
R  =  hydraulic  radius  (m) 
S  =  slope  of  culvert  invert  (m/m) 

Approximate  values  of  roughness  coefficient  are  listed  below: 

smooth  lined  culverts  n  =  0.012 

corregated  metal  culverts  n  =  0.024 

culverts  part  iaily  filledwith  grave  Is  and  cobbles   n  =  0.036 

Estimates  of  the  hydraulic  radius  of  culverts  can  be  obtained  from  Figure 
H-l.  A  nomograph  for  solving  Manning's  equation  and  an  example  problem  are 
given  in  Figure  H-2. 

DISCHARGE  MEASUREMENTS 

Standard  Measurement  Technique 

The  U.  S.  Geological  Survey  has  developed  a  technique  for  measuring 
the  discharge  in  a  river  (Buchanan  and  Somers,  1969).  A  relatively  straight 
and  uniform  reach  of  river  should  be  selected  for  taking  discharge  measure- 
ments. The  width  of  the  channel (s)  should  be  divided  into  a  number  of  sub- 
sections (25  or  more  are  recommended)  that  are  often,  but  do  not  have  to 
be,  the  same  width  (Figure  H-3 ) .  Velocities  are  measured  at  each  of  the  ob- 
servation points  at  one  or  more  depths  depending  on  the  flow  depth,  desired 
accuracy,  and  rate  of  change  of  the  flow.  Generally  speaking,  the  accuracy 
of  the  mean  velocity  increases  with  increasing  number  of  current  measurements 
at  one  observation  point.  An  exception  to  this  is  when  the  flow  is  changing 
rapidly,  thus  requiring  that  the  discharge  measurements  be  completed  in  a 
short  time  span.  Equations  for  calculating  mean  velocity  are  given  in  Figure 
H-3  for  three  common  measurement  techniques.  Discharge  in  each  subsection 
is  the  product  of  the  mean  velocity  in  the  subsection  and  the  cross-sectional 


149 


Definition  of  hydraulic  radius: 
R  =  A 


Where  R  =  hydraulic  radius 

A  =  flow  cross-sectional  area 
P  =  wetted  perimeter 

Approximate  value  of  hydraulic  radius  for  circular  culverts: 


Approximate  value  of  hydraulic  radius  for  arch  culverts: 


0.2  X  Span 


Span 


Figure  H-1 .     Methods  of  estimating  hydraulic  radius  of  culverts. 


150 


^.3 

p2 

15— 

-so 

149      Tm     1A 
EQUATION   V-      n     R^S*^ 

14— 

: 

-                                (English  Units) 

13— 
12- 

:40 

—.2 

'--                                    V=^R?^S^ 

11  — 

^  3                            (Metric  Units) 

10- 

— 

.1- 

: 

9- 

r30 

r 

8— 

-01 

_10 

L  4 

- 

■ 

I-  09 

r_ 

7  — 

1    OS 

L  5 

6— 

-20 

:  o7 

. 

L  06 

Le                                        ^ 

5 — 

- 

L  05 

.2- 

_ 

: 

Lo4 

4— 

- 

-  02 

o          Xo                          z 

_ 

^^ 

^03        1 

3- 

L10                ^t^                         ^ 

3- 

^P^ 
">- 

_ 

I              DC 

\^ 

- 

r9 

; 

^02          1 

^ 

^  '-_ 

'■-z                  = 

L03 

<0 

4- 

\. 

^ 

:   ^         1 

3 

\^ 

^^ 

-7  a          H 

_ 

:         1 

5- 

"-  ^                   \ 

^                                  2- 

w          z 

6   >                 UJ 

-04 

oc 

•-                                         ^ 

\                             '~'       ~ 

;    1        o 

: 

:_  009   ss 

Ij-                 ^ 

\.                         «fl      J 

-5  >-            E 

r 

[     ^ 

\                      ^*,. 

~     H              UJ 

-  05 

1 

L    008     ^ 
1-   007     ^ 

L4   0                   " 

UJ 

Q. 

L006     g 

\     ^ 

\^          - 

\  i     ^ 

L06 

2 

L  005      > 

1  — 

Example 

"^N; 

:     >             UJ 

-3                        Z 

L  07 

(0 

L.  OD4       ^ 

^ 

:        Given: 

:                   I 

i  08 

::rr^o3 

Invert  Slope  =  0.003 
r*          2m  dia.  circular 

O 
O 

L  09 

'--              corrugated  culvert, 

CC 

L  iO 

1- 

i-5             partially  lined 

_ 

-2 

_ 

L  002 

Flow  depth  In  culvert 
^6             =  0.3m 

5  — 

- 

- 

2- 

: 

1 

- 

-^     Find: 

- 

_ 

- 

Lg         Flow  velocity 

- 

- 

L  001 

~^     Solution: 

- 

" 

:_  0009 

_  OOOB 
_   0007 

3- 

-10       Select  roughness 

- 

-1.0 

1  2 

coefficient  of  0.02 

L.9 

- 

_    0006 

" 

Connect  slope  and 

L.8 

-_ 

4- 

roughness 

- 

1-    0005 

-_               coefficient 

2  — 

L  7 

L  3 

L  0004 

5-^ 

Estimate  hydraulic 

i.  6 

^  0003 

6— 

radius 

-.45  dia.  =  0.9m 
^            -flow  depth  0.3m 

L.5 

1  4 

0.9m 

Draw  line  from  hydraulic  radius  thr< 

3ugh 

-R  =  0.6  X  flow 

intersection  of  slope-roughness 

coefficient 

depth 

line  and  turning  line  to  the  veloci 

ty 

=  0.18m 

scale  to  get  V  =  0.88m/s 

Figure  H-2.     Nomograph  for  solution  of  IVIanning's  equation. 

151 


b(n-l) 


INITIAL 
POINT 


1,2,3,  n 

bi,b2,b3,       bn 

^1'^2'^3'       ^n 


EXPLANATION 

Observation  Points 
Dtstance  from  the  Initial 


Point  to  the  Observation  Point 
Depth  of  Water  at  the 
Observation  Point 


where 

where 

or 

or 

where 


COMPUTATIONS 


Q=E  ^i 


i=1 


_  f  biti-bi-i"|  , 
qi  =  V,  [ — 5 Jdi 


V:    =    V 


*^'2d*^'8d^2v,^)/4 


2d^%,'^2 


I 


6d 


V  =  mean   velocity  in  section   i 


2d 


.6d 


8d 


measured   velocity  at  0.2d  below  the  water  surface 
=  measured   velocity  at  0.6d    below  the  water  surface 
measured   velocity  at  0.8d    below  the  water  surface 


Figure  H-5.  Discharge  measurement  technique. 


152 


area  of  flow  in  the  subsection.  Total  discharge  in  the  channel  is  the  sum 
of  the  discharges  in  the  subsections  (Figure  H-3). 

Approximate  Measurement  Technique 

The  discharge  in  a  channel  can  be  approximated  using  simple  field  tech- 
niques. The  cross-sectional  area  of  flow  can  be  estimated  for  the  entire 
cross  section  as  the  product  of  the  top  width  and  the  average  depth.  The 
mean  surface  velocity  in  the  channel  can  be  estimated  by  placing  an  object 
which  just  barely  floats  in  the  flow  near  the  center  of  the  channel  and  record- 
ing the  time  required  to  travel  between  two  measured  points.  The  mean  velocity 
is  typically  80  to  90  percent  of  the  surface  velocity.  The  product  of  the 
estimated  mean  velocity  and  cross-sectional  area  is  the  estimated  discharge. 

REFERENCE 

Buchanan,  T.  J.,  and  Somers,  W.  P.   1969.   Discharge  measurements  at  gaging 
stations.  Chap.  A8,  Book  3,  Techniques  of  Water-Resource  Investigations 
of  the  United  States  Geological  Survey,  U.  S.  Government  Printing  Office, 
Washington,  D.  C.  65  pp. 


153 


ID 

3 

W 

1. 

o 

**> 

T3 
» 

m 

3 

« 

^ 

o 

<D 

C 

o 

0) 

^ 

4- 

10 

— 

o 

M\ 

10 

O 

CL 

<a 

E 

N 

O 

— 

<J 

lO 

01 

0) 

■*- 

10 

u 

l- 

> — 

•*- 

.«- 

U) 

l- 

n 

10 

3 

0- 

in 

r. 

Ol 

*- 

c 

I. 

— 

o 

4- 

s 

10 

E 

c 

._ 

0) 

■*- 

S 

cn 

LU 

01 

en 

c 

10 

I. 


o 


X 

o 


CO 

o 

c 


c 
o 


o 

en 
to 


1- 

(0 
CL 


I 

in 


^O 


•4-       —       r<~\ 




in 

rO 

CN 

\o 

00 

^ 

r- 

in 

(N 

O 

rO 

^ 

o 

o 

in 

Ov 

o 

O 

o 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

r- 

cA 

OM 

iTl 

CN 

— 

o 

1 

o 

1 

o 

o 

o 

00 

o\ 

1 

o 

1 

o 

1 

1 

in 

1 

in 

1 

1 
CN 

1 

00 

•<t 

•<t 

-t 

r^ 

t<^ 

CM 

CN 

CM 

• 

o 

tr\ 

• 

o 

o 

CN 
O 

CN 

o 

o 

d 

o 

d 

d 

O 

• 

o 

o 
d 

V 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

in 

ro 

■>* 

CN 

•<* 

CN 

1 

in 

I 

CN 

1 

— 

«D 

(A 

o 

1 

o 

1 

o 

1 

o 

1 

o 

1 

o 

■'l- 

CM 

lO 

o 

o 

o 

o 

in 

><\ 

y3 

ro 

— 

o 

o 

o 

in 

CN 

— 

•^ 

CN 

— 

A 

tn 

-* 

CM 

-* 

CM 

CM 

o 

• 

o 

CN 
VO 
O 

d 

V 

\- 

^ 

(U 

« 

I. 

■o 

> 

•o 

<L 

10 

c 

■o 

3 

I. 

1- 

ID 

._ 

o 

I. 

01 

I. 

cn 

— 

— 

in 

3 

n 

01 

T3 

0> 

a; 

m 

0) 

01 

o 

■o 

_ 

n 

— 

— 

0) 

> 

> 

— 

0) 

n 

0) 

D 

— 

a 

n 

in 

ID 

ID 

<u 

— 

in 

cr> 

3 

0 

3 

a 

JD 

I. 

L. 

k. 

> 

<u 

I. 

>~ 

c 

i_ 

o 

n 

O 

o 

o 

(0 

cn 

O) 

t> 

> 

10 

ID 

•♦- 

10 

n 

a 

o 

o 

O 

L. 

10 

o 

— 

3 

E 

u 

0) 

e 

O) 

k. 

(J 

o 

o 

0) 

D 

— 

(U 

— 

V) 

3 

cn 

1 

E 

>- 

CD 

— 

C7) 

— 

>~ 

l- 

•— 

0> 

>- 

■D 

•♦- 

E 

v_ 

v_ 

■o 

(0 

c 

(0 

l- 

10 

•o 

c 

ID 

I. 

c 

— 

s 

(U 

ID 

Q) 

E 

(0 

E 

0) 

o 

0> 

•— 

01 

0) 

10 

•— 

S 

> 

_l 

S 

to 

_1 

CO 

> 

u 

s 

u. 

Q- 

> 

to 

in 

■o 

c 

10 

>~ 

1- 

0 

* 

x: 

t- 

in 

fl) 

■D 

3 

■*- 

in 

S 

a. 

0 

O- 

s^ 

in 

CN 

E 

ID 

0) 

• 

U 

in 

4- 

in 

• 

c 

o 

— 

2 

c 

L. 

— 

01 

C^ 

c 

10 

o 

Q- 

3 

C 

E 

— 

I/) 

s 

0 

O 

— 

— 

Ll 

3 

E 

ID 

ID 

l. 

0) 

■o 

I. 

>- 

•♦- 

X 

in 

c 

00 

r^ 

• 

CJ\ 

> 

— 

L. 

0) 

• 

CO 

in 

3 

a> 

o 

>^ 

£ 

•— 

s     - 


c 

ID 


■o 

c 

ID 


in 


<u 

in 

0) 

0) 

> 

3 

o 

cr 

oo 

'— 

c 

F 

sz 

o 

o 

I. 

0) 

154 


Table  H-5.   Conversion  Factors 


Length 


Area 


Vo I ume 
Speed 


To  convert 

mm 
mm 
cm 
cm 

m 

m 

km 

2 

m 

2 

m 

ha 

^  2 

km 

3 

m 

m/s 


Vo I ume  flowrate    m/s 


Mass 
Force 

Pressure 

Temperature 

Concentrat  i  on 


kg 

N 

N 

kPa 


i  nto 

inches 

feet 

i  nches 

feet 

feet 

yards 

mi  I  es 

square  feet 

square  yards 

acres 

square  mile 

cubic  yards 

feet  per  second 

cubic  feet  per 

second 

pound-mass 

pound-force 

K  i logram-f orce 

pound-force    per 


Mu  1 1  i  p  I  y  by 

0.03937 
3.281  X  10 
0.3937 
3.281  X  10 
3.28  1 
I  .094 
0.6214 
10.76 
I  .  196 
2.471 
0.3861 
I  .308 
3.28  1 

35.31 
2.205 
0.2248 
0. 1020 


-3 


square  inch 
o^ 


mg/8. 


0.  1450 
9/5 

(then  add  32) 
parts  per  mi  II  ion  ~ I  .0 


155 


APPENDIX 


GLOSSARY 


abandoned  channel  —  A  channel  that  was  once  an  active  or  high-water  chan- 
nel, but  currently  flows  only  during  infrequent  floods. 

active  channel  —  A  channel  that  contains  flowing  water  during  the  ice-free 
season. 

active  floodplain  —  The  portion  of  a  floodplain  that  is  flooded  frequently; 
it  contains  flowing  channels,  high-water  channels,  and  adjacent  bars, 
usually  containing  little  or  no  vegetation. 

aesthetics  —  An  enjoyable  sensation  or  a  pleasurable  state  of  mind,  which 
has  been  instigated  by  the  stimulus  of  an  outside  object,  or  it  may 
be  viewed  as  including  action  which  will  achieve  the  state  of  mind  de- 
sired. This  concept  has  a  basic  psychological  element  of  individual 
learned  response  and  a  basic  social  element  of  conditioned  social  atti- 
tudes. Also,  there  can  be  ecological  conditioning  experience  because 
the  physical  environment  also  affects  the  learning  process  of  attitudes. 

algae  —  Primitive  plants,  one  or  many-celled,  usually  aquatic  and  capable 
of  elaborating  the  foodstuffs  by  photosynthesis. 

aliquot  —  A  portion  of  a  gravel  removal  area  that  is  worked  independently, 
often  sequentially,  from  the  other  portions  of  the  area. 

alluvial  river  —  A  river  which  has  formed  its  channel  by  the  process  of 

aggradation,  and  the  sediment  by  which  it  carries  (except  for  the  wash 
load)  is  similar  to  that  in  the  bed. 

arctic  —  The  north  polar  region  bounded  on  the  south  by  the  boreal  forest. 


157 


armor  layer  —  A  layer  of  sediment  that  is  coarse  relative  to  ttie  material 
underlying  it  and  is  erosion  resistant  to  frequently  occurring  floods; 
it  may  form  naturally  by  the  erosion  of  finer  sediment,  leaving  coarser 
sediment  in  place  or  it  may  be  placed  by  man  to  prevent  erosion. 

aufeis  —  An  ice  feature  that  is  formed  by  water  overflowing  onto  a  surface. 


such  as  river  ice  or  gravel  deposits,  and  freezing,  with  subsequent 
layers  formed  by  water  overflowing  onto  the  ice  surface  itself  and 
f reez  i  ng. 

backwater  analysis  —  A  hydraulic  analysis,  the  purpose  of  which  is  to 

compute  the  water  surface  profile  in  a  reach  of  channel  with  varying 
bed  slope  or  cross-sectional  shape,  or  both. 

bank  —  A  comparatively  steep  side  of  a  channel  or  floodplain  formed  by  an 
erosional  process;  its  top  is  often  vegetated. 

bank-full  discharge  —  Discharge  corresponding  to  the  stage  at  which  the 
overflow  plain  begins  to  be  flooded. 

bar  —  An  alluvial  deposit  or  bank  of  sand,  gravel,  or  other  material,  at 
the  mouth  of  a  stream  or  at  any  point  in  the  stream  flow. 

beaded  stream  —  A  small  stream  containing  a  series  of  deep  pools  intercon- 
nected by  very  small  channels,  located  in  areas  underlain  by  permafrost. 

bed  —  The  bottom  of  a  watercourse. 

bed  load  —  Sand,  silt,  gravel  or  soil  and  rock  detritus  carried  by  a  stream 
on,  or  immediately  above  its  bed. 

bed  load  material  —  That  part  of  the  sediment  load  of  a  stream  which  is 

composed  of  particle  sizes  found  in  appreciable  quantities  in  the  shift- 
ing portions  of  the  stream  bed. 


158 


bed,  movable  —  A  stream  bed  made  up  of  materials  readily  transportable  by 
the  stream  flow. 

bed,  stream  —  The  bottom  of  a  stream  below  the  low  summer  flow. 

braided  river  —  A  river  containing  two  or  more  interconnecting  channels 

separated  by  unvegetated  gravel  bars,  sparsely  vegetated  islands,  and, 
occasionally,  heavily  vegetated  islands.  Its  floodplain  is  typically 
wide  and  sparsely  vegetated,  and  contains  numerous  high-water  channels. 
The  lateral  stability  of  these  systems  is  quite  low  within  the  boun- 
daries of  the  active  floodplain. 

carrying  capacity,  biological  —  The  maximum  average  number  of  a  given  organ- 
ism that  can  be  maintained  indefinitely,  by  the  habitat,  under  a  given 
regime  (in  this  case,  flow). 

carrying  capacity,  discharge  —  The  maximum  rate  of  flow  that  a  channel  is 
capable  of  passing. 

channel  —  A  natural  or  artificial  waterway  of  perceptible  extent  which 

periodically  or  continuously  contains  moving  water.  It  has  a  definite 
bed  and  banks  which  serve  to  confine  the  water. 

configuration  —  The  pattern  of  a  river  channel (s)  as  it  would  appear  by 
looking  vertically  down  at  the  water. 

contour  —  A  line  of  equal  elevation  above  a  specified  datum. 

cover,  bank  —  Areas  associated  with  or  adjacent  to  a  stream  or  river  that 
provide  resting  shelter  and  protection  from  predators  -  e.g.,  undercut 
banks,  overhanging  vegetation,  accumulated  debris,  and  others. 

cover,  fish  —  A  more  specific  type  of  instream  cover,  e.g.,  pools, 
boulders,  water  depths,  surface  turbulence,  and  others. 


159 


cover,  instream  —  Areas  of  shelter  in  a  stream  channel  that  provide  aquatic 
organisms  protection  from  predators  or  a  place  in  which  to  rest,  or 
both,  and  conserve  energy  due  to  a  reduction  in  the  force  of  the  cur- 
rent . 

cross  section  area  —  The  area  of  a  stream,  channel,  or  waterway  opening, 
usually  taken  perpendicular  to  the  stream  center  line. 

current  —  The  flowing  of  water,  or  other  fluid.  That  portion  of  a  stream 

of  water  which  is  moving  with  a  velocity  much  greater  than  the  average 
or  in  which  the  progress  of  the  water  is  principally  concentrated  (not 
to  be  confused  with  a  unit  of  measure,  see  velocity). 

datum  —  Any  numerical  or  geometrical  quantity  or  set  of  such  quantities 

which  may  serve  as  a  reference  or  base  for  other  quantities.  An  agreed 
standard  point  or  plane  of  stated  elevation,  noted  by  permanent  bench 
marks  on  some  solid  immovable  structure,  from  which  elevations  are  meas- 
ured, or  to  which  they  are  referred. 

dewater  —  The  draining  or  removal  of  water  from  an  enclosure  or  channel. 

discharge  —  The  rate  of  flow,  or  volume  of  water  flowing  in  a  given  stream 
at  a  given  place  and  within  a  given  period  of  time,  expressed  as  cu 
ft  per  sec. 

drainage  area  —  The  entire  area  drained  by  a  river  or  system  of  connecting 
streams  such  that  all  stream  flow  originating  in  the  area  is  discharged 
through  a  single  outlet. 

dredge  —  Any  method  of  removing  gravel  from  active  channels. 

drift,  invertebrate  —  The  aquatic  or  terrestrial  invertebrates  which  have 
been  released  from  (behavioral  drift),  or  have  been  swept  from  (catas- 
trophic drift)  the  substrate,  or  have  fallen  into  the  stream  and  move 
or  float  with  the  current. 


160 


duration  curve  —  A  curve  which  expresses  the  relation  of  all  the  units  of 
some  item  such  as  head  and  flow,  arranged  in  order  of  magnitude  along 
the  ordinate,  and  time,  frequently  expressed  in  percentage,  along  the 
abscissa;  a  graphical  representation  of  the  number  of  times  given 
quantities  are  equaled  or  exceeded  during  a  certain  period  of  record. 

erosion,  stream  bed  —  The  scouring  of  material  from  the  water  channel  and 
the  cutting  of  the  banks  by  running  water.  The  cutting  of  the  banks 
is  also  known  as  stream  bank  erosion. 

fines  —  The  finer  grained  particles  of  a  mass  of  soil,  sand,  or  gravel.  The 
material,  in  hydraulic  sluicing,  that  settles  last  to  the  bottom  of 
a  mass  of  water. 

flood  —  Any  flow  which  exceeds  the  bank-full  capacity  of  a  stream  or  chan- 
nel and  flows  out  on  the  floodplain;  greater  than  bank-full  discharge. 

floodplain  —  The  relatively  level  land  composed  of  primarily  unconsolidated 
river  deposits  that  is  located  adjacent  to  a  river  and  is  subject  to 
flooding;  it  contains  an  active  floodplain  and  sometimes  contains  an 
inactive  floodplain  or  terrace(s),  or  both. 

flood  probability  —  The  probability  of  a  flood  of  a  given  size  being 

equaled  or  exceeded  in  a  given  period;  a  probability  of  I  percent  would 
be  a  100-year  flood,  a  probability  of  10  percent  would  be  a  10-year 
f lood. 

flow  —  The  movement  of  a  stream  of  water  or  other  mobile  substances,  or 
both,  from  place  to  place;  discharge;  total  quantity  carried  by  a 
stream. 

flow,  base  —  That  portion  of  the  stream  discharge  which  is  derived  from 

natural  storage  -  i.e.,  groundwater  outflow  and  the  draining  of  large 
lakes  and  swamps  or  other  sources  outside  the  net  rainfall  which 
creates  the  surface  runoff;  discharge  sustained  in  a  stream  channel, 


161 


not  a  result  of  direct  runoff  and  without  the  effects  of  regulation, 
diversion,  or  other  works  of  man.  Also  called  sustaining  flow. 

flow,  laminar  —  That  type  of  flow  in  a  stream  of  water  in  which  each  par- 
ticle moves  in  a  direction  parallel  to  every  other  particle. 

flow,  low  —  The  lowest  discharge  recorded  over  a  specified  period  of  time. 

flow,  low  summer  —  The  lowest  flow  during  <:  typical  open-water  season. 

flow,  uniform  —  A  flow  in  which  the  velocities  are  the  same  in  both  magni- 
tude and  direction  from  point  to  point.  Uniform  flow  is  possible  only 
in  a  channel  of  constant  cross  section. 

flow,  varied  —  Flow  occurring  in  streams  having  a  variable  cross  section 
or  slope.  When  the  discharge  is  constant,  the  velocity  changes  with 
each  change  of  cross  section  and  slope. 

fork  length  —  The  length  of  a  fish  measured  from  the  tip  of  the  nose  to  the 
fork  i  n  the  tail. 

freeze  front  —  A  surface  that  may  be  stationary,  which  has  a  temperature 
of  0  C  and  is  warmer  on  one  side  of  the  surface  and  colder  on  the 
other . 

frequency  curve  —  A  curve  of  the  frequency  of  occurrence  of  specific 
events.  The  event  that  occurs  most  frequently  is  termed  the  mode. 

gage  —  A  device  for  indicating  or  registering  magnitude  or  position  in  spe- 
cific units,  e.g.,  the  elevation  of  a  water  surface  or  the  velocity 
of  flowing  water.  A  staff  graduated  to  indicate  the  elevation  of  a 
water  surface. 

geomorphology  —  The  study  of  the  form  and  <levelopment  of  landscape  fea- 
tures. 


162 


habitat  —  Ttie  place  where  a  population  of  animals  lives  and  its  sur- 
roundings, both  living  and  nonliving;  includes  the  provision  of  life 
requirements  such  as  food  and  shelter. 

high-water  channel  —  A  channel  that  is  dry  most  of  the  ice-free  season, 
but  contains  flowing  water  during  floods. 

hydraulics  —  The  science  dealing  with  the  mechanical  properties  of  fluids 
and  their  application  to  engineering;  river  hydraulics  deals  with 
mechanics  of  the  conveyance  of  water  in  a  natural  watercourse. 

hydraulic  depth  —  The  average  depth  of  water  in  a  stream  channel.  It  is 
equal  to  the  cross-sectional  area  divided  by  the  surface  width. 

hydraulic  geometry  —  Those  measures  of  channel  configuration,  including 
depth,  width,  velocity,  discharge,  slope,  and  others. 

hydraulic  radius  —  The  cross-sectional  area  of  a  stream  of  water  divided 

by  the  length  of  that  part  of  its  periphery  in  contact  with  its  contain- 
ing channel;  the  ratio  of  area  to  wetted  perimeter. 

hydrograph  —  A  graph  showing,  for  a  given  point  on  a  stream,  the  discharge, 
stage,  velocity,  or  another  property  of  water  with  respect  to  time. 

hydrology  —  The  study  of  the  origin,  distribution,  and  properties  of  water 
on  or  near  the  surface  of  the  earth. 

ice-rich  material  —  Permafrost  material  with  a  high  water  content  in  the 

form  of  ice,  often  taking  the  shape  of  a  vertical  wedge  or  a  horizontal 
I  ens. 

impervious  —  A  term  applied  to  a  material  through  which  water  cannot  pass 
or  through  which  water  passes  with  great  difficulty. 


163 


inactive  floodplain  —  The  portion  of  a  floodplain  that  is  flooded  infre- 
quently; it  may  contain  high-water  and  abandoned  channels  and  is 
usually  lightly  to  heavily  vegetated. 

island  —  A  heavily  vegetated  sediment  deposit  located  between  two  channels. 

2 

large  river  —  A  river  with  a  drainage  area  greater  than  1,000  km  and  a 

mean  annual  flow  channel  top  width  greater  than  100  m. 

lateral  bar  —  An  unvegetated  or  lightly  vegetated  sediment  deposit  located 
adjacent  to  a  channel  that  is  not  associated  with  a  meander. 

Manning's  equation  —  In  current  usage,  an  empirical  formula  for  the  calcula- 
tion of  discharge  in  a  channel.  The  formula  is  usually  written 

-    1.49  ^  2/5  ^1/2  . 

0  =  R     S    A. 

^    n 

mean  flow  —  The  average  discharge  at  a  given  stream  location  computed  for 

the  period  of  record  by  dividing  the  total  volume  of  flow  by  the  number 
of  days,  months,  or  years  in  the  specified  period. 

mean  water  velocity  —  The  average  velocity  of  water  in  a  stream  channel, 
which  is  equal  to  the  discharge  in  cubic  feet  per  second  divided  by 
the  cross-sectional  area  in  square  feet.  For  a  specific  point  location, 
it  is  the  velocity  measured  at  0.6  of  the  depth  of  the  average  of  the 
velocities  as  measured  at  0.2  and  0.8  of  the  depth. 

meander  wave  length  —  The  average  downvalley  distance  of  two  meanders. 

meandering  river  —  A  river  winding  back  and  forth  within  the  floodplain. 
The  meandering  channel  shifts  downvalley  by  a  regular  pattern  of  ero- 
sion and  deposition.  Few  islands  are  found  in  this  type  of  river  and 
gravel  deosits  typically  are  found  on  the  point  bars  at  the  insides  of 
meanders. 


164 


2 

medium  river  —  A  river  with  a  drainage  area  greater  than  100  km   but  less 

2 
than  1,000  km   and  a  mean  annual  flow  channel  top  width  greater  than 

15  m  but  less  than  100  m. 

microhabitat  —  Localized  and  more  specialized  areas  within  a  community  or 

habitat  type,  utilized  by  organisms  for  specific  purposes  or  events,  or 
both.  Expresses  the  more  specific  and  functional  aspects  of  habitat  and 
cover  that  allows  the  effective  use  of  larger  areas  (aquatic  and  ter- 
restrial) in  maximizing  the  productive  capacity  of  the  habitat,  (See 
cover  types,  habitat). 

mid-channel  bar  —  An  unvegetated  or  lightly  vegetated  sediment  deposit  lo- 
cated between  two  channels. 

parameter  —  A  variable  in  a  mathematical  function  which,  for  each  of  its 
particular  values,  defines  other  variables  in  the  function. 

permafrost  —  Perennially  frozen  ground, 

pit  excavation  —  A  method  of  removing  gravel,  frequently  from  below  over- 
burden, in  a  manner  that  results  in  a  permanently  flooded  area.  Gravels 
are  usually  extracted  using  draglines  or  backhoes, 

point  bar  —  An  unvegetated  sediment  deposit  located  adjacent  to  the  inside 
edge  of  a  channel  in  a  meander  bend. 

pool  —  A  body  of  water  or  portion  of  a  stream  that  is  deep  and  quiet  rela- 
tive to  the  main  current, 

pool,  plunge  —  A  pool,  basin,  or  hole  scoured  out  by  falling  water  at  the 
base  of  a  water fal I , 

profile  —  In  open  channel  hydraulics,  it  is  the  water  or  bed  surface  ele- 
vation graphed  aganist  channel  distance. 


165 


reach  —  A  comparatively  short  length  of  a  stream,  channel,  or  shore. 

regional  analysis  —  A  hydrologic  analysis,  i he  purpose  of  which  is  to  esti- 
mate hydrologic  parameters  of  a  river  by  use  of  measured  values  of  the 
same  parameters  at  other  rivers  within  a  selected  region. 

riffle  —  A  shallow  rapids  in  an  open  stream,  where  the  water  surface  is 
broken  into  waves  by  obstructions  wholly  or  partly  submerged. 

riparian  —  Pertaining  to  anything  connected  with  or  adjacent  to  the  banks 
of  a  stream  or  other  body  of  water. 

riparian  vegetation  —  Vegetation  bordering  floodplains  and  occurring  within 
f loodp I  a  i  ns. 

riprap  -  Large  sediments  or  angular  rock  used  as  an  artificial  armor  layer. 

river  regime  —  A  state  of  equilibrium  attained  by  a  river  in  response  to 
the  average  water  and  sediment  loads  it  receives. 

run  —  A  stretch  of  relatively  deep  fast  flowing  water,  with  the  surface 
essentially  nont urbu I ent . 

scour  —  The  removal  of  sediments  by  running  water,  usually  associated  with 
removal  from  the  channel  bed  or  f loodp lain  surface. 

scrape  -  A  method  of  removing  floodplain  gravels  from  surface  deposits  using 
tractors  or  scrapers. 

sediment  discharge  —  The  volumetric  rate  of  sediment  transfer  past  a  spe- 
cific river  cross  section. 

sinuous  river  —  Sinuous  channels  are  similar  to  meandering  channels  with 
a  less  pronounced  winding  pattern.  The  channel  may  contain  smaller 


166 


point  bars  and  have  less  tendency  for  downvalley  shifting.  The  channels 
are  more  stable  with  respect  to  lateral  shifting. 

sinuousity  —  A  measure  of  the  amount  of  winding  of  a  river  within  its  flood- 
plain;  expressed  as  a  ratio  of  the  river  channel  length  to  the  corres- 
ponding valley  length. 

slope  —  The  inclination  or  gradient  from  the  horizontal  of  a  line  or  sur- 
face. The  degree  of  inclination  is  usually  expressed  as  a  ratio,  such 
as  1:25,  indicating  one  unit  rise  in  25  units  of  horizontal  distance, 

2 

small  river  -  A  river  with  a  drainage  area  less  than  100  km  and  a  mean 

annual  flow  channel  top  width  of  less  than  15  m. 

split  river  —  A  river  having  numerous  islands  dividing  the  flow  into  two 
channels.  The  islands  and  banks  are  usually  heavily  vegetated  and 
stable.  The  channels  tend  to  be  narrower  and  deeper  and  the  floodplain 
narrower  than  for  a  braided  system. 

stage  —  The  elevation  of  a  water  surface  above  or  below  an  established 
datum  or  reference. 

standing  crop  —  The  abundance  or  total  weight  of  organisms  existing  in  an 
area  at  a  given  time. 

straight  river  —  The  thalweg  of  a  straight  river  typically  winds  back  and 
forth  within  the  channel.  Gravel  bars  form  opposite  where  the  thalweg 
approaches  the  side  of  the  channel.  These  gravel  bars  may  not  be  ex- 
posed during  low  flow.  Banks  of  straight  systems  typically  are  stable 
and  floodplains  are  usually  narrow.  These  river  systems  are  considered 
to  be  an  unusual  configuration  in  transition  to  some  other  configura- 
tion, 

subarctic  —  The  boreal  forest  region. 


167 


suspended  load  —  The  portion  of  stream  load  moving  in  suspension  and  made 

up  of  particles  having  such  density  of  grain  size  as  to  permit  movement 
far  above  and  for  a  long  distance  out  of  contact  with  the  stream  bed. 
The  particles  are  held  in  suspension  by  the  upward  components  of  turbu- 
lent currents  or  by  colloidal  suspension, 

talik  —  A  zone  of  unfrozen  material  within  an  area  of  permafrost. 

terrace  —  An  abandoned  floodplain  formed  as  a  result  of  stream  degradation 
and  that  is  expected  to  be  inundated  only  by  infrequent  flood  events. 

thalweg  —  The  line  following  the  lowest  part  of  a  valley,  whether  under 
water  or  not;  also  usually  the  line  following  the  deepest  part  or 
middle  of  the  bed  or  channel  of  a  river  or  stream. 

thermokarst  —  Landforms  that  appear  as  depressions  in  the  ground  surface 
or  cavities  beneath  the  ground  surface  which  result  from  the  thaw  of 
ice-rich  permafrost  material. 

top  width  —  The  width  of  the  effective  area  of  flow  across  a  stream  chan- 
nel . 

velocity  —  The  time  rate  of  motion;  the  distance  traveled  divided  by  the 
time  required  to  travel  that  distance. 

wash  load  —  In  a  stream  system,  the  relatively  fine  material  in  near-perman- 
ent suspension,  which  is  transported  entirely  through  the  system, 
without  deposition.  That  part  of  the  sediment  load  of  a  stream  which  is 
composed  of  particle  sizes  smaller  than  those  found  in  appreciable 
quantities  in  the  shifting  portions  of  the  stream  bed. 

water  quality  —  A  term  used  to  describe  the  chemical,  physical,  and  biolog- 
ical characteristics  of  water  in  reference  to  its  suitability  for  a 
part  i  cu  I  ar  use. 


168 


wetted  perimeter  —  The  length  of  the  wetted  contact  between  the  stream  of 
flowing  water  and  its  containing  channel,  measured  in  a  plane  at  right 
angles  to  the  direction  of  flow. 

wildlife  —  All  living  things  that  are  neither  human  nor  domesticated;  most 
often  restricted  to  wildlife  species  other  than  fish  and  invertebrates. 


169 


CO 

E 
tf) 

E 
0) 

s 

CO 

1- 

_J 

c 
ro 

O- 

•o 
O 
O 

> 

+- 
O 
< 

c 

(0 
Q- 

■o 

0 
O 

0) 

> 

-1- 

o 

ID 

c 

0) 

o 

(0 

1- 

01 

1— 

c 
c 

(0 

-C 

u 

01 

> 

o 
< 

Q) 

c 
c 

u 

i_ 

0) 

! 

X 

01 

c 
c 

o 

■o 

c 
o 

"O 

c 
ro 
n 
< 

■D 
0) 
CD 

1- 

(0 

C 

o 

Q- 

CD 

n 

(0 

ro 
n 

Q) 

c 
c 

ID 

O 
1 

■o 

'i 

1- 

0) 
"O 

c 
ro 
0) 

E 

0) 
XI 

c 

tu 

■D 

c 

CD 
OJ 

E 
0) 

■o 

en 

-♦- 

D 

o 

■D 
C 
CO 

0) 

■D 
0) 

(D 

0) 

0) 

> 

c 

CD 
-D 

■o 

0) 

-*- 
CD 

-4— 

a> 
cr> 

> 

River 
si  ze 

Site 
locat  ion 

Assoc  i  ated 
channel 

Type    of    deposit 

Blank  template  to  be  used  with  matrix  tables  (see  page  51) 


50272-101 

REPORT  DOCUMENTATION 
PAGE 

1.    REPORT   NO. 

FWS/OBS-80/09 

2. 

3.   Recipient's  Accession  No. 

4.  Title  and  Subtitle 

GRAVEL    REMOVAL    STUDIES    IN   ARCTIC    AND    SUBARCTIC   FLOODPLAINS 
IN   ALASKA  -   GUIDELINES   MANUAL 

5.  Report  Date 

June   1980,    Pub.    date 

*•                   N/A 

7.  Author(s) 

WOODWARD-CLYDE    CONSULTANTS 

8.  Performing  Organization  Rept.  No. 

9.   Performing  Organization  Name  and  Address 

Woodward-Clyde   Consultants 

4791    Business   Park    Blvd.,    Suite   #1 

Anchorage,    Alaska  99503 

10.  Project/Task/Work  Unit  No. 

11.  Confract(C)  or  Grant(G)  No. 

(C)    FWS    14-16-0008-970 

(G) 

12.  Sponsoring  Organization  Name  and  Address 

U.    S.    Fish    and  Wildlife   Service 
1011   East   Tudor   Road 
Anchorage,    Alaska  99503 

13,  Type  of  Report  A  Period  Covered 

Final    Report 
1975  -   1980 

14. 

15.  Supplementary  Notes 

This  report    is   part   of    Interagency   Energy  -  Environment   Research   and  Development    Program 
of    the  Office  of    Research   and  Development,    U.S.    Environmental    Protection   Agency 

16.  Abstract  (Limit:  200  words) 

A    5-year    investigation   of    the   effects   of    floodplain    gravel    mining   on    the   physical 
and   biological    characteristics  of   river   systems    in   arctic   and  subarctic  Alaska 
is   described.    Twenty-five   sites  were   studied  within    four   geographic  regions.    The 
sites  were   selected   such    that   within   each   of    the  regions    the   group  of    sites  exhibited 
a   wide   range   of    river    and   mining    characteristics.    The    field    data   collection    program 
covered    the   major    disciplines   of    hydrology/hydraulics,    aquatic   biology,   water 
quality,    and    terrestrial    biology.     In    addition,    geotechnical    engineering,    and   aesthe- 
tics  site   reviews   were   conducted.    A  wide   range   of    magnitude   and    type   of    physical    and 
biological    changes   were   observed    in   response    to  mining    activity.    Little   change  was 
observed   at    some    sites,   whereas   other    sites   exhibited   changes    in    channel    morphology, 
hydraulics,    sedimentation,    ice  regime,    aquatic   habitat,   water    quality,    benthic 
macroinvertebrates,    fish   utilization,    vegetation,    soil    characteristics,    and  bird   and 
mammal    usage. 

Two  major   products  of    the   project    are   a   Technical    Report   which   synthesizes   and 
evaluates   the   data  collected   at    the  sites,    and  a  Guidelines  Manual    that    aids   the 
user    in    developing    plans   and   operating   material    sites    to  minimize   environmental 
effects. 

17.  Document  Analysis     a.  Descriptors 

Gravel    Removal,    Alaska,   Arctic,    Subarctic,    Floodplains,    Streams,    Scraping,    Pit 
Excavation,    Environmental     Impacts,    Hydrology-Hydraulics,    Aquatic   Biology,    Terrestrial 
Ecology,   Water   Quality,   Aesthetics,   Geotechnical    Engineering,    Site   Selection,    Site 
Design. 

b.  Identifiers/Open-Ended  Terms 

c.  COSATI   Field/Group 

IS.  Availability  Statement 

19.  Security  Class  (This  Report) 

Unclassi  f  ied 

21.  No.  of  Pages 
165 

Re  lease   un 1 imi ted 

^-  ern=£i%i'if /y^cr'"" 

22.  Price 

(See  ANSI-Z39.18) 


See  Instructions  on   Reverse 


OPTIONAL  FORM  272  (4-77) 
(Formerly  NTlS-35) 
Department  of  Commerce 


^     -(iVS    GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE:  1980 699-278 


W  HO  I 

DOCUMENT 

COLLECTION 


REGIONAL  OFFICE  BIOLOGICAL  SERVICES  TEAMS 


Region  1 

Team  Leader 

U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 

Lloyd  500  Building,  Suite  1692 

500  N.E.  Multnomah  Street 

Portland,  Oregon  97232 

FTS:  429-6154 

COMM:  (503)231-6154 

Region  2 

Team  Leader 

U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 

P.O.  Box  1306 

Albuquerque,  New  Mexico  87103 

FTS:  474-2971 

COMM:  (505)  766-1914 


Region  4 

Team  Leader 

U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 

17  Executive  Park  Drive,  N.W. 

P.O.  Box  95067 

Atlanta,  Georgia  30347 

FTS:  257-4457 

COMM:  (404)  881-4457 

Region  5 

Team  Leader 

U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 

One  Gateway  Center 

Suite  700 

Newton  Corner,  Massachusetts  021 58 

FTS:  829-9217 

COMM:  (617)  965-5100,  ExL  217 


Region  3 

Team  Leader 

U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 

Federal  Building,  Fort  Snelling 

Twin  Cities,  Minnesota  551 11 

FTS:  725-3593 

COMM:  (612)  725-3510 


Region  6 

Team  Leader 

U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 

P.O.  Box  25486 

Denver  Federal  Center 

Denver,  Colorado  80225 

FTS:  234-5586 

COMM:  (303)  234-5586 


Alaska  Area  Office 
Team  Leader 

U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 
1011  E.Tudor  Road 
Anchorage,  Alaska  99503 
FTS:  399-01 50  ask  for 
COMM:  (907)  276-3800 


i 


^ 
^ 


4k