Skip to main content

Full text of "Globe artichokes in Connecticut"

See other formats


Globe 


Artichokes 
in  Connecticut 


BY  DAVID  E.  HILL 


- 


TV   ■      ■  ' 

.'■  Of  poi  ■  ■  " 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2011  with  funding  from 

LYRASIS  members  and  Sloan  Foundation 


http://www.archive.org/details/globeartichokesiOOhill 


Globe  Artichokes 


in  Connecticut 


BY  DAVID  E.  HILL 


The  production  of  globe  artichokes  for 
American    markets   is  largely  confined   to   coastal 
California   where   cool  summers   and    mild   winters 
favor   year-round  supply  from   about   9,500   acres. 
Although   nearly   60%  of   California's   artichokes 
are  sold   locally  in   the   Los   Angeles-San   Francisco 
region,   30%  of  the   crop  is  shipped   to   the   New 
York-Boston   region   (Anon.   1985). 

As  an   alternate   crop   for   Connecticut 
farmers,  artichoke  culture  captured    my  attention 
4  years  ago  because  the  state  lies  in  the  center 
of  an  important  artichoke-consuming  region  and 
an  artichoke  crop  has  a  high  cash  value. 

The  globe  artichoke,  a   biennial  plant,  grows 
vegetatively  the  first   year  and   matures  the 
second,  sending   forth   the   edible   flower   buds. 
When  artichokes  are  grown  from   seed,  this  two- 
year  cycle  requires   mild   winters  for  survival;  but 
Connecticut's   winters  are  severe  and  only  heroic 
measures  of  plant   protection  have  allowed 
artichokes   to  survive.      The   growth   cycle   of   the 
plant,  however,  can   be  shortened   by   vernalization 
of  seed  (moist  chilling)  and  application  of 
gibberellic   acid   (GA3)   to   young   plants   (Gerakis, 
Markarian   and    Honma    1969).      These   treatments 
initiate   flower   budding  in   5   to   6-month-old 
plants   and   permit   production   of  artichokes   in   a 
single   year.      Thus,   the   globe   artichoke    may  be 
grown   as   an   annual   plant. 

In   this   Bulletin,  I  report   experiments   with 
management   requirements,   yield   and   quality 
trials,  and   winter   protection   in   Connecticut. 

MATERIALS    AND    METHODS 

Vernalization  of  seeds  and  seedlings.      Vernal- 
ization, or    moist   chilling  of  seeds,   was   begun 


between  January  25  and   February   5  for  harvest 
of  artichokes   beginning  in  late  July.      Seeds   were 
soaked  in   water  for   2  days  at  room 
temperature;   packed   in   moist,  unshredded 
sphagnum    moss  in  an  unsealed  plastic  bag;  and 
refrigerated   4   weeks   at   35  to   40   F.      The  seeds 
were  examined  periodically  and   moistened   when 
necessary  to  prevent  drying.     After  2  to  4 
weeks,  the  germinated  seeds  were  ready  to  be 
planted  if  the  root  emerged   1/2  to   1  inch. 

Greenhouse   management.     About   March   5  to 
10,  germinated  seedlings   were  transferred  to   1- 
quart   plastic   containers   filled   with   Promix   BX 
and  placed  in  a  greenhouse.     The  peaty  potting 
mixture  contained   enough  fertilizer  to   maintain 
early  growth.     Because  warm   days   may 
devernalize  the  seedlings  (Harwood  and   Markarian 
1968),  the  greenhouse  was  heated  or  ventilated 
to   maintain  temperatures  between   50   F  at  night 
and   65   F  during  the  day.      No  supplementary 
light   was   used   to   extend  daylength.      About   20% 
more  seeds   must  be  germinated  to  allow  culling 
of  stunted   plants.      About   April   10   to   25, 
seedlings  were  transferred  to  a  cold  frame  to 
harden  before  transplanting  in  the  field. 

Transplanting.     Trials   were   conducted   at   the 
Valley   Laboratory,   Windsor,  on   Merrimac   fine 
sandy  loam,  a  sandy  terrace  soil  with  somewhat 
low    moisture   holding  capacity;   at   Lockwood 
Farm,   Mt.   Carmel,  on   Cheshire   fine  sandy   loam, 
a  loamy  upland  soil  with   moderate   moisture 
holding  capacity;   and   at   Comstock-Ferre   Farm, 
Wethersfield,  on   Hadley  silt   loam,   a   silty   flood 
plain  soil   with  high    moisture   holding  capacity. 
The  soils   were   fertilized   with   1300   lb/A   of 
10-10-10   and   limed   to   attain   a   pH   of   6.5. 
Plants   were  set   in   the   field    May   5   to   10.      The 


Connecticut    Agricultural   Experiment    Station 


Bulletin    846 


container-grown   plants   had   prominent   tap  roots 
curled   at   the   bottom   of   each   pot.      After   the 
root  ball  was  removed  from   the  pot,  the  tap 
root   was  straightened,  and   the   plant   was  set   in 
a  hole  deep  enough  to  accommodate  its  length. 
Plants  were  set   3  feet  apart   in  rows   4  feet 
apart,  a   density   of   3,630   plants/A. 

Plot  design   and   the   cultivars '  used   varied 
according  to   the   objective  of  the   experiment. 
In   1984,   Green   Globe  and   Grande   Buerre   were 
planted   at    Mt.   Car m  el  in   4   rows   of   15   plants 
each.     Treatments   were  vernalization  and   GA3, 
GA3   without   vernalization,  vernalization   without 
GA3,  and   no   vernalization   and   no   GA3.      In 
1985,   50   plants   each   of   Green   Globe,   Grande 
Buerre,   Green   Globe   Improved,  and   Purple   Globe 
were  planted  at   Windsor  and   Mt.  Carmel.     To 
determine  the   most  effective  time  of   GA3 
treatment,   10  vernalized  plants  of  each  cultivar 
were  treated  on  June   30,  July   10,  July  20,  and 
July   30.      Ten   vernalized   plants   remained 
untreated.     In   1986,  this  experiment  was 
repeated  at   Windsor  and   Mt.  Carmel,  except 
that   Purple   Globe  was  not  grown  at   Windsor. 
In  addition,  20  vernalized  plants  of  each  cultivar 
were  planted  at   Wethersfield.     Fifteen  of  twenty 
plants  were  selected  for  treatment   with   GA3  on 
July   17;  five  were  untreated.     Plants  with 
visible  flower  buds  on  the  treatment  date  were 
not  treated. 

One  hundred  parts  per   million   GA3   was 
applied  to  foliage  on  each  treatment  date.      By 
June   30,  all  plants  had  reached  the   10-leaf 
stage  required  for  treatment  (Gerakis,   Markarian 
and   Honma   1969). 

Pest  control  was  not  needed.      Minor 
infestations  of  aphids  in  the  greenhouse  were 
controlled  by  indigenous  lady  beetles  after 
transplanting  in  the  field. 

Weeds  were  controlled  by  grass   mulch  in 
1984   and   by  cultivation   in   1985   and   1986. 

Artichokes   were  harvested  and   weighed 
before  the  lowest  bracts  on  the  bud  began  to 
unfurl.      Artichokes  smaller  than   70   grams 
(2.5  oz)  were  culled. 

The  yields  reported  for  each  cultivar  are 
averages   for  the   four  treatment   dates.      Since 
some  treatment  dates  did  not  produce  optimum 
response  of  the   plants   to   GA3,   I  report   the 
yields  as  "potentials",  taking  into  account  only 
those   plants   that  set   buds   and   eliminating  those 


that   were   barren   because   of   poor   timing   of 
treatment.      Actual   yields   can   be   calculated   by 
multiplying  the  buds/acre  x  %   plants   producing  in 
Table   3. 

Winter  protection.      A   dry   mulching  technique 
used   to   protect   roses   in   winter   (Rose,   Pellett, 
and   Aleong   1982),   was   applied   to   barren 
artichoke  plants  in  the  fall.     In   mid-December 
1984,  the  tops  of  barren   plants   were  severed 
1  inch  above  ground  after  they  had   partially 
withered   from   earlier  frosts.      Plastic   bags   were 
filled   with  vermiculite,  perlite,  or  styrofoam 
chips,   inserted   into   2-gal  black   plastic   pots,  and 
inverted   over   the   plant   stump.      The   inverted 
pots   were  pinned   with  stakes  to  resist   wind. 
Leaves   were  piled  around  the  inverted   pot,  with 
drain  holes  open  for  ventilation.     For 
comparison,  other  plants  were  simply   mulched 
with   8   inches   of  leaves.      Ten   plants   received 
each  treatment.     In  addition,  six  plants  of  Green 
Globe   and   Grande   Buerre   were   dug   November   1, 
placed  in   2-gal  pots,  transferred  to  a  cool 
greenhouse   (50   to   65   F)  over   winter,  and   on 
May  1,   1985,  replanted  in  the  field. 

RESULTS 

Vernalization  and  GA3  treatment.     In  initial 
experiments  in   1984,  I  determined  the  response 
of  Green   Globe  and   Grande  Buerre  artichoke 
plants  to  vernalization  and   GA3  treatment, 
(Table   1).      Flowering  of  both  cultivars  was 
greatest  with  vernalization  of  seed  and  seedlings 
and   treatment   with   GA3.      GA3   treatment   alone 
was  clearly   more  effective  than  vernalization 
alone.      In   1985,   however,  up  to    100%   of 
vernalized   Green   Globe,   Green   Globe  Improved 
and   Grande   Buerre   plants  not   treated   with   GA3 
flowered   (Table   2).     I  speculate  that  the   poorer 


TABLE   1 —PERCENT  OF   ARTICHOKE  PLANTS 
FLOWERING  IN  RESPONSE  TO  VERNALIZATION 
AND  GA3  TREATMENT  IN   1984 


+Vern     +Vern     -Vera 
+GA3        -GA3        +GA3 

%  %  % 


Green  Globe 
Grande  Buerre 


80 
HO 


10 
5 


35 
25 


-Vera 
-GA3 
% 

0 
0 


Globe   Artichokes 


response   of   plants   to   vernalization   alone   in    1984 
was   probably  due   to  devernalization  by   high 
temperatures  during  hardening   in   a   poorly 
ventilated   cold   frame.      In    1986,  delayed 
vernalization   in  late   February  caused  some 
cultivars   to   produce  buds  late   in   October   when 
damaging  frosts  occurred. 


The  percentage  of  plants  producing  buds  was 
not  consistently  affected  by  GA3  treatment 
among  years  (Table  2).  In  1985,  treatment  with 
GA3  increased  buds  of  Green  Globe,  Green 
Globe  Improved,  and  Purple  Globe  by  15  to  83% 
at  Mt.  Carmel,  and  -9  to  300%  at  Windsor.  At 
Mt.  Carmel,  all  plants  of   Grande   Buerre 


TABLE  2--RESP0NSE  OF   VERNALIZED  PLANTS  TO  GA3   TREATMENT  ON  DIFFERENT 
DATES  IN   1985-1986    (10   PLANTS/TREATMENT) 


Mt.  i 

Carmel 

Wind 

sor 

%   Plants 

%   Plants 

Budding 

Buds/Plant* 

Budding 

Buds/Plant» 

1985 

1986 

1985 

1986 

1985 

1986 

1985 

1986 

Green  Globe 

June  30 

90 

70 

2.2 

1.2 

90 

100 

1.8 

2.2 

July  10 

100 

70 

2.5 

2.6 

70 

90 

1.5 

1.9 

July  20 

100 

60 

2.7 

1.1 

70 

100 

2.3 

2.6 

July  30 

100 

80 

2.6 

1.3 

100 

50 

2.9 

1.1 

Average  (treated) 

98 

70 

2.5 

1.5 

82 

85 

2.1 

2.0 

Untreated 

70 

70 

2.4 

0.9 

90 

100 

2.4 

2.2 

Grande  Buerre 

June  30 

100 

90 

2.5 

1.8 

80 

90 

1.1 

1.6 

July  10 

100 

40 

2.9 

0.6 

60 

100 

1.0 

1.9 

July  20 

100 

70 

2.4 

1.5 

70 

90 

1.2 

2.0 

July  30 

100 

80 

2.9 

1.2 

90 

90 

3.1 

2.3 

Average  (treated) 

100 

70 

2.7 

1.3 

75 

92 

1.6 

2.0 

Untreated 

100 

60 

2.7 

1.5 

70 

60 

2.1 

0.9 

Green  Globe  Impr. 

June  30 

90 

30 

1.7 

0.5 

90 

40 

1.6 

0.6 

July  10 

90 

40 

1.9 

1.3 

90 

30 

2.3 

0.9 

July  20 

100 

0 

2.3 

0 

70 

0 

1.8 

0 

July  30 

90 

10 

2.4 

0.1 

70 

0 

1.6 

0 

Average  (treated) 

92 

20 

2.1 

0.5 

80 

18 

2.2 

0.4 

Untreated 

80 

0 

1.8 

0 

60 

0 

1.4 

0 

Purple  Globe 

June  30 

50 

20 

0.8 

0.2 

20 

- 

0.3 

- 

July  10 

70 

0 

1.8 

0 

40 

- 

0.6 

- 

July  20 

50 

20 

1.0 

0.4 

40 

- 

0.8 

- 

July  30 

50 

0 

1.1 

0 

20 

- 

0.4 

- 

Average  (treated) 

55 

10 

1.2 

0.2 

30 

- 

0.5 

- 

Untreated 

30 

10 

0.7 

0.2 

10 

- 

0.2 

- 

•Barren  plants  were  excluded  from  calculations. 


Connecticut    Agricultural   Experiment    Station 


Bulletin    846 


produced   artichokes,  and   at    Windsor,   treated 
plants   with   buds   increased   7%  compared   to 
untreated. 

In    1986   at   Mt.   Carmel,   most   cultivars   had 
28-72%   fewer   plants   respond   to   GA3   treatment 
compared   to   treated   plants   in   1985.      There   was 
a   similar  response   among  untreated   vernalized 
plants.      In    1986   at   Windsor,   however,   Green 
Globe   and   Grande   Buerre   had   3-1796   more   plants 
respond   to   GA3   treatment   compared   to    1985. 
In   1986,  untreated    Green    Globe   Improved   was 
barren   at   both  sites.      At   Mt.   Carmel  and 
Windsor,   GA3   treatments  on   June   30   or   July   10 
caused   30-40%  of   Green   Globe   Improved   to   form 
buds.      At    Mt.   Carmel,   Purple   Globe   responded 
poorly   to   GA3   treatment. 

Although   GA3   treatment   accelerates   bud 
development   and   earliness   (Snyder,   Welch,  and 
Rubatzley,   1971),   it   is   important   to   determine 
its   effect   on   yield.      There   was   no   clear   effect 


of   GA3   treatment   on   yield   of   Green   Globe   and 
Grande   Buerre   for   1985   and    1986   (Table   2).      I 
averaged   the   buds/plant  for   the   four  treatment 
dates   and   compared   them    to   buds   produced   by 
untreated   plants   for   each  cultivar.      It   is   evident 
that    GA3   treatment   does   not   consistently 
increase   the   number  of   buds/plant   for   Green 
Globe  and   Grande   Buerre.      These   cultivars   are 
easily   vernalized   and   can   form   productive 
laterals   without    GA3   treatment. 

By  comparison,   Green    Globe   Improved   and 
Purple   Globe  responded   to    GA3   treatments. 
Seeds   and  seedlings   of  these   cultivars   are    more 
difficult   to   vernalize   and    GA3   treatment   in   1985 
and    1986   at   both  sites   increased   production   by 
0.3   to   0.8   buds/plant.      Despite   the   increased 
production   caused   by   GA3   treatment,  however, 
neither   Green   Globe   Improved   nor   Purple   Globe 
matched   the   yield   of   Green    Globe   or   Grande 
Buerre. 


TABLE   3— YIELD  OF   ARTICHOKES  FROM  VERNALIZED  PLANTS  TREATED  WITH  GA3 


Windsor 


Mt .   Carmel 


Wethersfield 


Plants 

Producing 

% 


Buds/ 

Plant 

No» 


Buds/ 
Acre 
No" 


Plants 

Producing 

% 


Buds/ 

Plant 

No« 


Buds/ 
Acre 
No" 


Plants 
Producing 

% 


Buds/   Buds/ 
Plant  Acre 

No»    No" 


1984 


Green  Globe 

- 

Grande  Buerre 

- 

1985 

Green  Globe 

814 

Grande  Buerre 

71 

Green  Globe  Imp. 

76 

Purple  Globe 

26 

1986 

Green  Globe 

88 

Grande  Buerre 

86 

Green  Globe  Imp. 

1H 

Purple  Globe 

- 

- 

- 

73 

- 

- 

no 

2.6 

9438 

92 

2.5 

9075 

100 

2.3 

8348 

90 

1.8 

6534 

50 

2.3 

8348 

70 

2.0 

7260 

68 

2.1 

- 

14 

_ 

- 

12 

•Barren  plants  were  excluded  from  calculations. 
"Potential  yields  are  calculated  from  average  buds/plant  x  3630  plants/A 
yields  are  about  11,000  buds/A. 


4.4 

15972 

- 

- 

- 

1.7 

6171 

— 

— 

— 

2.7 

9801 

. 

„ 

— 

2.7 

9801 

- 

- 

- 

2.3 

8348 

- 

- 

- 

2.2 

7986 

- 

- 

- 

2.1 

7623 

40 

3.9 

14157 

1.9 

6897 

60 

3.8 

13794 

3.0 

- 

10 

3.5 

- 

1.6 

- 

0 

0 

— 

x  36: 

30  plant 

;s/A.  California 

Globe    Artichokes 


Neither   percentage   of   plants   producing 
artichokes   nor  buds/plant  offer  a   clear   indication 
of  the   best  date  of   GA3   treatment.      In   1985   at 
Mt.   Car m el,   percentage   of   plants   with   buds   was 
greatest   with   July   10   treatment,  but   at    Windsor, 
with   June   30   or   July   30   treatment.      In    1986, 
the  highest   percentage  of  plants   with  buds 
occurred   with   June   30   treatment  at   both  sites. 
In   1985,  the  greatest   number  of  buds/plant 
followed   July   30   treatment,  but   in   1986, 
followed   July   10   treatment. 

Yield.      In   frost-free   California,  larger   plants 
are  grown  at  wider  spacing  than  in  Connecticut. 
With   1,100   plants/A   (Ryder,   DeVos,  and   Bari 
1983)   and   an   average  of   10   buds/plant,  about 
11,000   buds/A  in   each  crop  in   California. 

In   1984   at    Mt.   Carmel,   Green   Globe 
averaged   4.4   buds/flowering  plant,  the   highest 
yield   among  all  cultivars   (Table   3).      With   3,630 
plants/ A,  Green   Globe  could  produce  nearly 
16,000   buds/A.      Grande   Buerre  yielded   only   40% 
as   many. 

In   1985,  the   average   potential  yield   of  four 
cultivars   at   Mt.   Carmel   was   8,984   buds/A   and 
at    Windsor,   8,349   buds/A,  a   difference   of   8%. 
At   both  sites,   Green    Globe   and   Grande   Buerre 
had  the  highest  potential  yields,  which  would 
approximate  California's  production.     "Potential" 
yield  is  the  yield  calculated  for  (buds/flowering 
plant)  x  (number  of  all  plants).      Mt.  Carmel  had 


the   highest   percentage   of  budding   plants. 

In   1986,  the   average   potential   yield   of   Green 
Globe   and   Grande   Buerre   at    Windsor   was   7,804 
buds/A,  at   Mt.   Carmel,   7,260   buds/A,  and   at 
Wethersfield   nearly   twice   as   many,   13,976 
buds/A.      Although   fewer   plants   produced 
artichokes  at   Wethersfield,   higher  yields   were 
borne  on  larger   plants.      Green   Globe  Improved 
and  Purple   Globe  were  excluded  from   the 
averages  because  of  the  low  percentage  of 
budding  plants. 

At    Mt.   Carmel  and    Windsor,  the   percentage 
of  budding  plants   and   yield/plant   were  less   in 
1986   compared   to   1985.      Among  sites,   Windsor 
had  the  highest   percentage  of  budding  plants  and 
Wethersfield  the  lowest. 

Maturity.      Table   4   lists   the   harvest   dates   of 
all  cultivars   at   all  sites   for   1984-1986.      The 
first  date  represents  the  harvest  of  the  first 
artichoke  of  commercial  quality.     Early 
production  of  small  artichokes  was  not  included. 
The  concluding  date  was  usually  when  the 
temperature  fell  below   25   F. 

In   1984,  the  harvest  began  in  late  August 
and  concluded  in  early  October,  a   6-7   week 
harvest.      A   killing  frost  ended  the  harvest. 

In   1985,   harvest   of   most   cultivars   began   July 
16   to   17   at    Mt.   Carmel  and   Windsor  and 
concluded   with  killing  frosts  on  October  24  at 
Windsor  and   November   11   at   Mt.  Carmel. 


TABLE  4-- HARVEST  DATES  OF   ARTICHOKES   IN   1984-1986 


1984 
Green  Globe 
Grande  Buerre 


Mt.  Carmel 


Aug  22-0ct  9 
Aug  27-0ct  9 


Windsor 


Wethersfield 


1985 
Green  Globe 
Grande  Buerre 
Green  Globe  Impr. 
Purple  Globe 


Jul  17-Nov  11 
Jul  17-Nov  11 
Jul  17-Nov  11 
Jul  30-Nov  11 


Jul  16-Oct  24 

Jul  16-Oct  24 

Jul  16-Oct  10 

Jul  30-0ct  24 


1986 
Green  Globe 
Grande  Buerre 
Green  Globe  Impr. 
Purple  Globe 


Jul  21-0ct  10 
Jul  17-Oct  10 
Jul  27-Oct  16 
Jul  27-Sep  12 


Jul  10-Sep  25 
Jul  10-Sep  25 
Aug  12-0et  9 


Jul  17-Oct  16 
Aug  12-0ct  16 
Aug  26-Oct  16 


Connecticut    Agricultural   Experiment    Station 


Bulletin    846 


Harvest   lasted    17   weeks  at    Mt.   Carmel  and   14 
weeks  at    Windsor   for   most   cultivars. 

In   1986,   harvest   at    Mt.   Carmel  began   July 
17   and   concluded   October   16,  a   13-week   period. 
At    Windsor,   harvest   of  three   cultivars   began   on 
July   10   and   concluded   on   October   9,  a   13-week 
period.      At    Wethersfield,   harvest  of   Green    Globe 
lasted   13   weeks,  but  harvest  of   Grande   Buerre 
and   Green   Globe  Improved  started  late  and 
concluded   after   7-9   weeks.      Despite   the   early 
conclusion  of  harvest  of  the  four  cultivars  on 
October   9   to   16,  the   harvest   of  other  cultivars 
not   included   in  this  study   began   in   late   August 
and   concluded   November   5   with  a   killing   frost 
at   all  sites. 

Finally,   the   harvest   period  of   1985   was 
extended  by  formation  of  a  second  crop  on  some 
plants.     Plants  that  had  produced  artichokes  by 
mid-August   withered   and  sent   forth   new   shoots 
from   the  root  crown.     Artichokes   were  produced 
on  about   5%  of  these  resprouted  plants. 

Winter  protection.      Artichoke   plants   that  are 
unproductive  the   first   year  despite   vernalization 
or   GA3   treatments   require   winter   protection. 
Three   methods  can   be   considered:   1)  outdoor 
mulching,  2)  repotting  the   whole  plant  for  indoor 
maintenance,  and   3)  root  storage. 

Periodic  examination  of  the  soil  surrounding 
the  root  crown  of   mulched  plants  revealed  that 
the  soil  remained  unfrozen  except   when 
temperatures   fell   below   15   F.      At   this   time 
frost   penetration   was   about   one   inch. 

Vermiculite   pillows   offered   the   best 
protection   for  both   Green   Globe  and   Grande 
Buerre.      Perlite  and  styrofoam    were  less 
effective  protectors  for  both  varieties.     Plants 
that   were    merely  covered   with   leaves  did   not 
survive.     In  the  spring,  surviving  plants  had 
viable  shoot   buds   on  the   root   crown   just   below 


TABLE  5--PERCENT  SURVIVAL  OF   ARTICHOKE 
PLANTS  PROTECTED  BY  DRY  MULCHES  OR  LEAVES 
IN  THE  FIELD 

Green  Globe  Grande  Buerre 

i  % 


Vermiculite 

60 

40 

Perlite 

30 

10 

Styrofoam 

0 

20 

Leaves 

0 

0 

ground   level.      If   buds   were   numerous,  the   roots 
were  dug  and  cut   into  two  or  three   "stump 
pieces"  and   replanted.      If  the   buds   were   few, 
the   root   was   replanted   intact.      Only  a   third   of 
the  plants  from   stump  pieces   had   buds,  and  they 
averaged   1.4   buds/plant.      About    55%  of  the 
roots   planted   intact   yielded   2.1    buds/plant. 

Plants   dug  and   placed   in   2-gal   plastic   pots 
in   a  cool   greenhouse  survived   well.      The   plants 
did  not  enlarge  and   maintained  a  relatively 
constant   number  of  leaves.      As   old   leaves   died 
at   the  base,  new  leaves  emerged   from   the 
crown.     After  replanting  in  the  field  on   May  1, 
the   plants  grew.      Harvest   began   July   30. 
Nearly   85%  of   Green   Globe   had   buds   and 
averaged   3.2   buds/plant.      Only   3396   of   Grande 
Buerre   had   buds  and   produced   an   average   of   3.0 
buds/plant. 

Attempts   to  store   dug  artichoke  roots   over 
winter   were   largely  unsuccessful.      Only   5%  of 
roots  stored  at   40   F  survived. 

CONCLUSIONS 

1.  Artichokes  of  commercial  quality  can  be 
grown  in  Connecticut.     Three  years  of  testing 
have  shown   that   the   harvest   period   ranges   from 
6-17   weeks  and   is   highly  dependent   upon  local 
climate.      Artichokes  seem   best  suited  for 
Connecticut's  roadside  and  farmers   markets  for 
retail  sales  because  the  harvest  generally  occurs 
in  the  summer  and  early  fall  when   wholesale 
prices  are  low.     November  harvests  are 
preferable  because  the  California  crop  is 
insufficient   to    meet   consumer  demand   and   prices 
rise.      November   harvest,   however,   requires 
careful  control  of  the  growth  cycle  of  the  plant 
and  cooperative   weather. 

2.  Gibberellic  acid  to  promote  early  budding 
is  necessary  only  if  the  crop  shows  no  bud 
formation.      Only  barren   plants   need   to   be 
treated   between   July   10-20. 

3.  Winter   protection   is   expensive,  labor 
intensive,  and   likely  has   no   place   in   commercial 
production.      For   the   home  gardener   with   a   few 
plants,   winter   protection   by   moving   barren   plants 
to  a  cool,  sunny  area   indoors   may  suffice. 
Artichokes   normally  appear  on   replanted   plants 
as   they  complete   their   biennial  cycle. 

4.  Among  the   four   cultivars   tested,  only 
Green    Globe  and   Grande   Buerre   approached 


Globe    Artichokes 


California   yields.      About   30   cultivars   from 
Mediterranean  countries   will   be  tested   in   1987. 

REFERENCES 

1.  Anon.      1985.      Agricultural  Statistics   1985. 
USDA.      551p. 

2.  Gerakis,  P.A.,   D.   Markarian,  and  S.  Honma. 
1969.     Vernalization  of  globe  artichoke,  Cynara 
scolymus   L.     J.   Amer.   Soc.   Hort.   Sci.   94:254-8. 

3.  Harwood,   R.R.  and   D.   Markarian.      1968. 
Annual  culture  of  globe  artichoke  (Cynara 
scolymus  L.).  I.  Preliminary  Report.     Proc. 
Amer.   Soc.   Hort.   Sci.  92:400-9. 

4.  Rose,  A.E.,  N.E.  Pellett,  and  J.  Aleong. 
1982.     Effect  of  protective  covers  on  cold 
acclimation  and  survival  of  Hybrid  Tea  roses. 


J.   Amer.   Soc.   Hort.   Sci.   107:1173-7. 

5.  Ryder,  E.J.,   N.E.   DeVos,   and    M.A.   Bori. 
1983.      The  globe   artichoke   (Cynara  scolymus   L.). 
HortSci.   18:646-53. 

6.  Snyder,   M.J.,   N.C.   Welch,  and   V.E. 
Rubatsky.      1971.     Influence  of  gibberellin  on 
time  of  bud   development   in  globe   artichoke. 
HortSci.   6:484-5. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  thank  Abigail  A.  Maynard  for  her  faithful 
and  capable  assistance  in  the  field,  and  in 
compilation  of  data.  I  also  thank  the  Williards 
of  Comstock-Ferre  Seed  Company,  Wethersfield, 
for  generously  allowing  me  to  use  a  portion  of 
their  All  American  Seed  Trial  garden  for  my 
trials   in    1986. 


I* 
The  Connecticut  Agricultural  Experiment  Station, 

founded  in  1875,  is  the  first  experiment  station  in  America.  It  is  chartered 
by  the  General  Assembly  to  make  scientific  inquiries  and  experiments 
regarding  plants  and  their  pests,  insects,  soil  and  water,  and  to  perform  analyses  for  State 
agencies.  The  laboratories  of  the  Station  are  in  New  Haven  and  Windsor;  its  Lockwood 
Farm  is  in  Hamden.  Single  copies  of  bulletins  are  available  free  upon  request  to  Pub- 
lications; Box  1 106;  New  Haven,  Connecticut  06504.  ISSN  0097-0905