0
0
0
1
4
3i
3l
Oi
0!
ifornia
anal
ity
ACKS
THE LIBRARY
OF
THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES
/ _^x^
-/^^*^A
/Xx4 XV*"
DR. JOHN BULL,
From a picture painted in Antwerp. Circa 1625.
Frontispiece.
GOD SAVE THE KING
THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY
OF THE
OF
THE NATIONAL ANTHEM
BY
WILLIAM H. CUMMINGS,
Mus. Doc., Dub., F.S.A., Hon. R.A.M.
LONDON: NOVELLO AND COMPANY, LIMITED
AND
NOVELLO, EWER AND CO., NEW YORK.
1902.
LONDON:
NOVELLO AMD COMPANY, LIMITED,
PRINTERS.
MUSIC
LIBRARY
ML
PREFACE.
SCARCELY a month passes without some paragraph
appearing in the public journals concerning the origin
of the music of our National Anthem. Untenable
theories, which have often been refuted, are paraded
as new discoveries; discussions more or less relevant
ensue, are read with avidity, and then, becoming
forgotten, are allowed to repose in obscurity for a
time, but with a certainty that in due course the
whole matter will be re-opened. I propose, therefore,
in the following pages, to state and consider various
theories which have been advanced, and to publish
some documents by Dr. Burney and others which are
of great weight and value, and which have never
before been made public.
Our National Anthem, from long association, has
become a sacred part of our national life. The
Journal des Debats has pithily remarked : " It is
a melancholy fact that France does not possess a
song which can be really called national. In a
national song the first and most indispensable
element is religious sentiment. ... As for England,
we need not mention the air at the sound of which
all Englishmen rise and uncover their heads, and
which is played at the farthest extremities of the
world."
Two striking instances of the sacred use of our
National Anthem are worthy of record — the first
( iii ) A 2
1C67052
PREFACE.
belongs to a peaceful and happy celebration, and the
second to a sad and heart-breaking tragedy.
In 1879, Queen Victoria presented a church
organ to the inhabitants of Pitcairn Island, who, it
will be remembered, were descendants of the old
mutineers of " The Bounty." The instrument was
conveyed to the island in Her Majesty's ship "Opal,"
and on arrival at the island the organ was promptly
transferred to the shore and placed in position. The
inauguration was attended by the whole population,
men, women and children, ninety-three in number.
" Then, by one of those picturesquely appropriate
touches that strike so happily the mind of a com-
munity affected by a single impulse of feeling, the
scene became at once as pathetic as beautiful, for
hardly had the instrument been opened, than it and
the people burst into the music of the National
Anthem. The effect was touching in the extreme, as,
verse by verse, the grand harmony of ' God save the
Queen ' rolled from the little church-house on the
cliff, and was taken up by the ship's crew on the
shore. It was no rehearsed scene, but a spontaneous
and uncontrollable outburst of loyal gratitude :
Her Majesty's gracious kindness, and such an
unexpected and substantial proof of it, transported
the Islanders with delight, and in the strains of the
National Anthem they celebrated the glad renewal
of their allegiance which they had feared was
despised."
This narration of the joyous occasion of which
the National Anthem formed so conspicuous and
appropriate a part, may be contrasted with another
PREFACE.
historic but tragic event, when its strains were
adopted by a few heroes as their triumphant death-
song. During the Matabele war, in 1894, thirty-four
Englishmen found themselves, after three hours'
fighting, absolutely surrounded and hemmed in by
the natives. The little band, commanded by Major
Wilson, were all wounded and their ammunition was
well-nigh expended ; the Major, covered with blood
from his many wounds, stood erect and continued to
fire at the foe, assisted by a wounded comrade who
stood by his side and loaded the rifles for him. The
natives crawled along the ground and by degrees
drew nearer the few surviving 'English, till at last
the supreme and inevitable moment arrived when, in
overwhelming numbers, they rushed in upon the
devoted band who, of one accord, stood up, uncovered
their heads, and joined in singing " God save the
Queen," and whilst so engaged were ruthlessly
assegaied.
It is not necessary to refer to the numerous
interesting and historic occasions of the past,
wherein the performance of our National Anthem
has formed an important feature ; it can, however,
be confidently asserted that its hallowed strains will
continue to be fervently echoed and re-echoed by the
many millions of peoples, throughout the world, who
are proud of their allegiance to our beloved King
and Emperor, Edward the Seventh.
W. H. C.
March 1902.
THE NATIONAL ANTHEM.
"GOD SAVE THE KING."
Ich muss den Rnglandern ein wenig zeigen, was
in dem " God Save the King " fur ein Segen ist.
(I must show the English a little what a
blessing they have in their " God save the
King.") — BEETHOVEN'S Diary, 1813.
The muddle and almost hopeless confusion which
has grown up in connection with the inquiry as to
the origin of the music of "God save the King"
is largely due to the patriotic and well-meant
endeavours of Richard Clark, a bass singer in
the Chapels Royal, Westminster Abbey, and St.
Paul's Cathedral, who died in the year 1856.*
In 1814 Clark published a work, which now lies
before me, entitled " The Words of the Most
Popular Pieces performed at the Glee Club," &c.
In the preface to this book he says, " Difference
of opinion has prevailed in the musical world
respecting the composition of the popular air and
words of ' God save the King ' ; some account of
both may not be uninteresting. Such as strikes
the editor as worthy of consideration is submitted,
and in the language of George Saville Carey, by
* The Rev. Baring Gould, in " English Minstrelsie," says : " Clark was deputy-
organist at Westminster Abbey, and then at the Chapels Royal"; a mistake — I
knew him well, he could not play the organ. He commenced his music-career
as a singing boy in St. George's Chapel, Windsor and Eton College, and at
his death was a Gentleman of Her Majesty's Chapels Royal, Vicar Choral of
St. Paul's Cathedral, and Lay Vicar of St. Peter's, Westminster.
( I )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
whom it is given, in vindication of his father, for
whom he claims the honour of this national song,
and to which it would seem that he is justly entitled."
Clark then narrates a biography of Henry Carey,
and the son's presentation of his father's claims,
in which all the evidence it was possible to adduce
is brought forward to prove that Henry Carey wrote
the music and words of " God save the King."
Clark concludes the special pleading on behalf of
Carey with the following statement of his own :
" John Ward speaks of ' God save the King ' in
his account of the Professors of Gresham College,
published 1740, where he gives a catalogue of
Dr. Pepusch's music as follows : ' No. xviii. 2 vols.
4to. Vol. I. folio 56. " God save the King," ' which
is all that is there mentioned of it. It has been
thought to be a variation of that gentleman's
composed on the above tune, but the editor has
not been able, at present, to meet with it."
The above, as I have already stated, was
published in 1814. Eight years afterwards, in 1822,
Clark issued another book, called " An account of
the National Anthem entitled 'God save the King!'
with authorities taken from Sion College Library,
the ancient records of the Merchant Taylors'
Company, the old Checque*-book of His Majesty's
Chapel, &c. &c. &c. Selected, edited, and arranged
by Richard Clark." In this book, which he dedi-
cated to the " Master, Wardens, and Court of
Assistants to the Worshipful Company of Merchant
Tailors," he entirely discards his previous theory
Sic.
2 ;
GOD SAVE THE KING.
that Carey was the author of "God save the King,"
and boldly asserts that it was specially composed
by Dr. John Bull for an entertainment given by
the Company to King James I. on July 16, 1607.
Clark proceeds to give various interesting extracts,
one of them fully proving that Dr. John Bull per-
formed on a "very rich pair of organs" before
the King at that feast.
The account is taken from the ancient records
of the Merchant Taylors' Company, and runs as
follows : " On Thursday, July 16, 1607, His
Majesty King James the First, Prince Henry,
and many honourable persons dined at the
Merchant Tailors' Hall. ... At the upper end of
the Hall there was set a chair of estate, where
his Majesty sat and viewed the Hall ; and a very
proper childe, well spoken, being clothed like an
angel of gladness, with a taper of frankincense
burning in his hand, delivered a short speech, con-
taining xviii. verses, devised by Mr. Ben Johnson,*
which pleased his Majesty marvellously well : and
upon either side of the hall, in the windows near the
upper end, were galleries, or seats made for music, in
either of which were seven singular choice musicians,
playing on their lutes, and in the ship, which did
hang aloft in the hall, three rare men and very
skilful, who song to his Majesty, and over the King,
sonnetts, and loud musique, wherein it is to be
remembered, that the multitude and noyse was so
great that the lutes nor songs could hardly be heard
or understood, and then his Majesty went up into the
* Spelt thus in the Merchant Taylors' records.
( 3 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
King's chamber, where he dined alone at a table
which was provided only for his Majesty and the
Queen (but the Queen came not), in which chamber
were placed a very rich pair of organs, whereupon
Mr. John Bull, Doctor of Music, and a brother of
this company, did play all the dinnertime ; and
Mr. Nathaniel Gyles, Master of the Children of the
King's Chapel, together with Dr. Montague, Bishop
of Bath and Wells, and Dean of his Majesty's
Chapels, Lenard Davis, Sub-Dean, and divers
synging men, Robert Stone, William Byrde, Richard
Granwell, Crie. Sharpe, Edmund Browne, Thos.
Woodson, Henrie Eveseede, Robert Allison, Jo.
Hewlett, Richard Plumley, Thos. Goold, William
Laws, Elway Bevin and Orlando Gibbons, Gen.
extraordinary, and the children of the said chapel,
did sing melodious songs at the said dinner; after
all which, his Majesty came down to the great hall,
and sitting in his chair of estate, did heear a
melodious song of farewell by the three rare men in
the shippe, being apparelled in watchet silk, like
seamen; which song so pleased his Majesty, that he
caused the same to be sung three times over."
"Dr. Bull, and Mr. Nathaniel Gyles admitted into
the lyvery of this company. Also at this court the
company have accepted and taken Mr. John Bull,
Doctor of Musique, and a brother of this company,
into the clothing and livery of the company. Also,
they have accepted and taken Mr. Nathaniel Gyles,
who hath his grace to be Doctor of Musique, and is
Master of the Children of the King's Chapell, into
the freedom of this society, and into the clothing and
( 4 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
lyvery of the same ; and it is ordered that they shall
be placed in the lyvery next unto the Assistant ; and
note, that the lyvery-hoods were put upon their
shoulders, but neither of them sworn ; and the
Company are contented to shew their favour unto
them for their paynes when the King and Prince
dined at their Hall, and their love and kindness in
bestowing the musique which was performed by
them, their associates, and children, in the King's
chamber gratis : whereas the musicians in the great
hall exacted unreasonable sums of the Company for
the same, and therefore the Company mean not that
this calling of Mr. Dr. Bull and Mr. Nathaniel Gyles
into the lyvery hath any burthen or charge unto
them further than shall stand with their own good
liking."
The foregoing account is taken from the Archives
of the Merchant Taylors' Company, and Clark supple-
ments it with the following from Howes' Continuation
of Stow's " Annals " :* " The King, during this and
the election of the new Maisterand Wardens, stoode
in a newe window made for that purpose ; and with
a gracious kingly aspect, behelde all their cerimonies,
and being descended into the hall to depart, his
majestie and the Prince were then again presented
with like musique of voyces and instruments, and
speeches, as at the first entrance. The musique
consisted of twelve lutes, equally divided, 6 and 6 in
a window on either side the hall, and in the ayre
between them were a gallant shippe triumphant,
* "Annals; or, a general Chronicle of England, begun by John Stow; continued
and augmented, unto the end of the year 1631, by Edmund Howes, gent." (Stow
died two years before the banquet took place.)
( 5 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
wherein were three rare menne like saylors, being
eminent for voice and skill, who in their several
songs were assisted and seconded by the cunning
lutanist. There was also in the hall, the musique of
the city ; and in the upper chamber, the children of
his Majesties Chappell song a grace at the King's
table, and whilest the King sat at dinner, John Bull,
Doctor of Musique, one of the organists of his
Maiesties Chappel Royal, and free of the Merchant
Tailors, being in a citizen's gown, cappe, and hood,
plaied most excellent melody upon a small pair of
organs placed there for that purpose onely, concerning
the bountie of the feast, and plentie of all things as
well for pleasant princely entertainments of the King,
the prince, the nobility, and the rest, where were
very many braue courtiers and other gallants, as were
most rare and excellent. The Company of Merchant
Tailors also after that gaue very kind respect,
with full and honourable reward unto every man,
according to their highest measure of desert, that
did them any service or kindness, either by voice or
instruments, making of speeches, or setting of songs
or otherwise."*
Clark's comment on this is : " Not one of the
speeches, songs, sonnets, or music, that was per-
formed at that great entertainment, is to be met
with ; " and yet he was the first to make the
statement that " God save the King" was composed
for that particular occasion, and was then sung in
Merchant Taylors' Hall. Clark's bold assertion was
* The rewards and payments made by the Company will be found in the
Appendix, page 89.
( 6 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
quoted as a fact, on the occasion of the Prince of
Wales dining with the Merchant Taylors' Company,
April 6, 1875, when the master said, " Permit me to
remind you that in 1607 Ben Jonson wrote, and
Dr. John Bull added music to, ' God save the
King.' "
In the above extract from the " Annals," the only
approach to a particularisation of the music per-
formed on the occasion of the banquet to King
James, is to be found in the Grace which was sung
by "the children of his Majesties Chappell." The
identification even of this piece is not possible ;
although Clark argues that as Byrde was one of the
singers, and also the composer of " Non nobis,
Domine," it must have been his music which was
performed. It is sufficient to regard this as highly
probable.
On page 67 of his book, Clark says, " I shall now
proceed to prove that Dr. Bull composed the music
of ' God save the King ' before the year 1613, by the
following extract from the old Cheque-book now at
the King's Chapel, which states : —
In 1613 John Bull, Doctor of Musique, went beyond
the seas without licence, and was admitted into the Arch-
Duke's service, and entered upon pay there about Mich. ;
and Peter Hopkins, a base, from Paul's, was sworne into
his place the 27 of December following ; his wages from
Mich, unto the day of swearing-in of the said Peter
Hopkins, was disposed of by the Deane of his Majesty's
Chapel."
Clark adds : " It is not at all probable that he (Bull)
should have written any music in honour of the
( 7 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
King of England, after having been discharged from
his Chapel ; he therefore must have composed it
previously." Admitting that Bull composed an air
with variations which he entitled " God save the
King," but which particular piece had nothing in
common with our National Anthem, as I shall
presently show, I fail to see why he should not have
written it after he had quitted the King of England's
service, and become one of the musicians in the court
of a friendly prince. Bull had a son whom he was
anxious to get admitted in the King's chapel, as is
proved by a letter of his, which is still extant ;*
he therefore had every reason for endeavouring to
secure the favour of James I., a monarch generally
credited with a great liking for flattery and
adulation. Clark's crowning proof now comes before
us. He says, "the following extract from the
manuscript music of Dr. Bull will prove beyond a
doubt that he did compose the music of ' God save
the King.' " In Ward's lives of the Professors ot
Gresham College, published in London, 1740, we
read as follows : " There is extant a large number
and variety of Dr. Bull's pieces in manuscript that
make up a part of the curious and valuable collection
of music, now reposited in the library of Dr. Pepusch ;
of which I shall here add the following account, as
communicated to me by the Doctor." Clark then
copies from Ward's account the index to a large
folio of music " for the organ or harpsichord," also
of a second volume, large quarto, but as these
contain nothing to the point, I shall pass them over
* See Appendix, page 94.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
and come to the third volume quarto, of which the
index stands as follows : — *
Folio.
i. Praeludium to the fantasia, Felix namque offertorium.
i. Fantasia, Felix namque offertorium.
8. Galliard, Madamoyselle Charlotte de la Haye.
15. Tres voces in unum, Salvator mundi.
56. GOD SAVE THE KING.
63. Gloria tibi, Trinitas.
77. Fantasia on a chromatic subject, a 4v.
86. Door Dr. Bull gemaekt, ter eeren Van Goduart Van Kappell.
88. Dr. Bull voor my gemaekt, En revenant.
92. Levez vous, cceur.
98. Air.
101. Ballet, die partyen door Dr. Bull op superius gemaekt.
102. Philis heeft myn hert gestoolen, voor my gemaekt.
103. Gemaekt op * *
105. Courante de chapelle primi toni, ann. 1619.
105. Courante de chapelle.
106. Galliard op die eerste courante.
107. Almand de chapelle primi toni.
109. Galliard de chapelle primi toni.
no. Galliard.
in. Allmand op die voorgaende galliard.
113. Fantasia.
114. Fantasia.
116. Den lustelycken Mey. Imperfect.
Clark proceeds to say, " Here then (on folio 56)
is a positive, incontrovertible, and undeniable claim
by Dr. Bull to the tune of ' God save the King,' as
composed by him in honour of King James the First.
It must be the same tune which is sung at the present
time.'" This was a strong assertion to make, and an
unfortunate one, Clark never having seen the
volume to ascertain what the music on folio 56 really
The Lives of the Professors of Gresham College." By John Ward. Page 205
( 9
GOD SAVE THE KING.
was like. Fortunately the identical book was then
in the possession of Dr. Kitchener, a medical man
by profession, also an enthusiastic musical amateur
of moderate musical ability ; excited by Clark's
account, he examined folio 56 of Bull's MS., and
finding the statement wholly untrue, Dr. Kitchener
employed Edward Jones, the well-known musical
antiquary and harpist, to make a copy of the music,
which the doctor published in 1823 with the following
note : " This is an accurate copy of the ' God save
the Kinge ' mentioned in the above index, which Mr.
Edward Jones, Bard to the King, was so obliging as
to transcribe, putting it at the same time into our
modern notation. Dr. Bull's, being on six-line
staves with a multiplicity of clefs, in its original
form was illegible, except by a musical antiquary,
and too complicated to be playable without such an
arrangement. The editor briefly remarks that
Dr. John Bull's composition is a sort of ground or
voluntary for the organ, of the four notes C, G, E, F,
with twenty-six different basses ! and is no
more like the anthem now sung than a frog is like
to an ox."
Bull's composition, with the title he gave it, "God
save the Kinge," is printed at length in the Appendix,
(page 73). It will be seen that the theme
exactly fits the words God save the King.
By a curious coincidence it is an anticipation of
( 10 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
the theme of a fugue by Sebastian Bach, No. 7 in
the second book of the Wohltemperite Klavier —
It is important to notice the date of the composi-
tion is given in the manuscript, 1616, for although
this is not appended to folio 56 in Ward's index, the
omission, for which Dr. Pepusch was responsible,
must have been purely accidental ; certainly such
was the case with one of the Bull volumes referred
to and described in Ward's list, which having per-
sonally examined, I have noted the omission of no less
than twelve dates.* If, then, the date of the composi-
tion be 1616, three years after Bull left England,
it could not possibly have been performed at the
Merchant Taylors' Hall in 1607. One would have
supposed that the publication of Dr. Kitchener's
evidence would have convinced Clark of the blunder
he had made, and have kept him silent ; he, however,
seems to have accepted the fact that the tune was
not what he had described, but at the same time he
endeavoured to cover his retreat by venturing on the
following assertion : " The ground lately produced
by Dr. Kitchener, composed by Dr. Bull, bearing
the title of ' God save the King,' proves what I have
before stated, that the first naming a tune or piece of
music in honour of the king was by Dr. Bull." It
has been already stated that the tune composed by
Dr. Bull with the title of "God save the Kinge,"
' This book is now in the British Museum.
( II ) B
GOD SAVE THE KING.
may be taken to represent either a chant to the four
words or a musical embodiment to the cry of the
populace. The short phrase " God save the King"
must have been in frequent use in the house of God,
in the Palace, and in the streets, from the time of
King Solomon downward.*
In the year 1823 the question of the authorship of
" God save the King " frequently cropped up in the
public journals, and at length the " Gentleman's
Magazine" of 1836 devoted several articles to its con-
sideration, and finally closed with the following
sentence : " We are therefore arrived at the close
of our inquiry, and the result appears to be that
the original music of ' God save the King ' was an
anthem prepared by Purcell or Blow for the Chapel
of James the Second."
This brought Clark again into the forefront of the
fight, and in August, 1837, he published a short
pamphlet addressed " To the lovers of research, the
historian, and the impartial critic." It will be
unnecessary to say much of this extraordinary pro-
duction, excepting that Clark roundly asserts " no
doubt the melody was as popular then (in Purcell's
day) as it is as this time," and that Purcell had
avowedly imitated Bull's melody. He adds, "A
continuation on this subject nevertheless will shortly
appear. In the meantime, R. Clark respectfully
assures his Royal, Noble, and Honourable Sub-
scribers, and especially the Master, Wardens, and
* Norton (Thos.). "Warning agaynst the Dangerous Practices of Papists of the
late Rebellion (Popish Rebellion in Yorkshire). Published by John Daye, 1569."
On the last leaf we read "God save our Queene Elizabeth and confound hir
enemies."
( 12 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Court of Assistants, of the Worshipful Company of
Merchant Tailors, that his former account is correct,
and that the National Anthem and National Grace,
' Non nobis, Domine,' were written in Latin by Ben
Jonson to please King James the First, he being
considered a good Latin scholar, and were first sung
in their Hall." I have already examined the truth
of most of the foregoing myth, and do not think it
worth while wasting many words over the ignorant
assumption that Ben Jonson wrote the words " Non
nobis, Domine ! non nobis, sed nomini Tuo da
gloriam," the ninth verse of the Psalm " In exitu
Israel " (in our English version the first verse of
the H4th Psalm). After this publication of Clark's
(1837) there ensued a short truce, but the subject
was re-opened by a letter of inquiry addressed to
The Musical World, September, 1839.* Whether
written from a spirit of mischievous fun, or really
from a desire for more accurate knowledge it
is now impossible to decide, but certain it is,
there soon followed letters from John Parry
and others, notably Dr. Rimbault, who dealt
mercilessly with Clark's unwarranted assertions.
Matters became more complicated by the appear-
ance, in the same periodical (November 21, 1839),
of a remarkable letter signed James Henry
Saville, of Bishopsgate Street Within ; it detailed
the discovery of certain curious old hymns or songs
of the time of Henry VII., on the subject of
" Long lyve ye Kinge " and " Godde preserve ye
Kinge," and on the following December 12 the
* Published in the number dated October 10.
( 13 ) B 2
GOD SAVE THE KING.
excitement was intensified by the publication of
the following: —
Sir, — I beg to trouble you with the following account of a
very curious manuscript I have lately come into the possession
of. In my preambles about town I had occasion (feeling
hungry) to go into a cheesemonger's shop in the neighbourhood
of Clerkenwell to purchase a piece of cheese ; perceiving that
the shopman had served the little girl with some butter
wrapped up in a piece of music in manuscript, I asked him if
he had any more music of that kind ; he stated that he had
had a great quantity that he purchased for waste-paper, some
written and some printed, and produced the one I am now
about to describe, which was the last he had left, which he said
if it was of any use to me I might have ; the paper is very old,
about the time of James or Charles I., one side is blank, with
the following number at the corner, 141. On the side which
is not paged is the music, the staves have five lines, but on the
music side a sixth had been added with the pen ; at top is
written the " King's Anthem," " Dr. Bull." For a long time
I was not able to make these words out, except the words
" King's " and " Dr. Bull," which are plain enough ; but on
account of the k, in the other words being carried down like a
yt it puzzled me for some time ; at the beginning of the stave
is the sign for common time, with a dot and a figure of three
underneath it : the music is barred with six minims in a bar
for the first seven bars only, which seven bars contain the
tune of our present " God save the King," only the tune
appears to be different to that which is played now ; the tune
has harmony to it, either for the organ, or as I suppose
another keyed instrument (perhaps the virginal, as I have
heard of such an instrument), but as I only play the fiddle a
little I am not sufficiently able to judge. Underneath the first
bar (with the aid of a glass, for the writing is so small it can
scarcely be traced with the naked eye), is the following words :
" God save oure mightye Kinge." After the first seven bars,
which contains the whole of the tune, there is other music,
apparently in a different time, beginning with the words, " In
the O Lorde." There is not the whole of the anthem, but in
the whole page, containing twelve staves, there are thirty-four
bars very closely written, and very full (I mean of harmony).
GOD SAVE THE KING.
The tune of " God save the King " is in the key of G, with
the sharps placed before the notes. Should anybody wish to
see it I shall be happy to forward it to your office, if you will
put a notice to that effect in your answer to correspondents. —
Yours,
THOMAS HUNTER.
Gray's Inn Lane.
The pretended discovery by Mr. Thomas Hunter
of " The King's Anthem, Dr. Bull " was readily
believed in by some, although there were others
who doubted its genuineness. The MS. was
sent to Richard Clark for his inspection, who
wrote to the Musical World another long letter
re-asserting all his previous statements respecting
Bull, Ben Jonson, and the Merchant Taylors'
Company, but he closed it with the following
cautious paragraph : —
If the MS. [tent by Mr. Hunter] headed "The King's
Anthem, Dr. Bull," which has been forwarded to me for my
inspection, be genuine, it is a further confirmation of what I
have already stated of Dr. Bull. By the watermark in the
sheet of music-paper containing the tune in question, the paper
was made by P. Ballard about 1607, of which make I have
much in my possession. If this said MS. be not genuine
(which I much suspect), we shall learn something more
respecting it anon." — (Musical World, February 13, 1840.)
It appears that the MS. was shown to Sir Francis
Madden, the Keeper of the Manuscripts in the
British Museum, and he expressed his opinion that
it was " undoubtedly a forgery, written within these
twenty years, and that the paper was anterior to the
time."
I should not have referred to the letters of James
Henry Saville and Thomas Hunter had I not feared
that some enthusiastic student might hereafter dis-
cover and reproduce them as reliable statements of
( 15 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
veritable facts. In order to prevent any such use
being made of them, I am able to state that they
were both the concoction of the late Joseph Warren,
a well-known and accomplished musician and
antiquary. Originally intended as an amusing hoax,
these letters doubtless added to the mystery and
confusion which surrounded the subject of the
authorship of " God save the King." Mr. Warren
subsequently endeavoured to make amends by
informing Mr. Richard Clark of the true state of
the case ; but, so far as I know, the latter never
publicly referred to the matter. The following letter,
addressed to Mr. Warren, was given me by him,
with permission to publish it : —
Litlington Tower,
Cloisters, Westminster,
February 12, 1846.
Dear Sir, — When you were at my house looking through my
own book with the accounts of persons in the Musical World
on the long-disputed subject of "God save the King," you
mentioned various funny circumstances which had been
pursued by yourself, Dr. Rimbault, Mr. Chapelle, and Mr.
Davidson only for the purpose of bringing out before the
public all that could possibly be written on that subject you
stated also that whilst you were at the Museum one day you
concocted the piece of music said to have been found at a
Cheesemonger's Shop, Islington this was taken by Mr.
Chapelle to (I forget who) — he pronounced the same a
forgery all this you wished me to transcribe in my own
book stating that you had authorised me to do so. Now you
will oblige me by drawing up the above particulars in a letter
and put the same in the post because there were several other
amusing facts which I do not recollect. I should like to place
yours to me on the subject beside Dr. Rimbauts', Mr. Nichol's,
and Mr. Chapell's. Your early reply will oblige,
Dear Sir, yours truly,
To Joseph Warren, Esq. RICHD. CLARK.*
* The spelling and punctuation are printed literatim from Clark's manuscript.
( 16 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Mr. Warren told me he adopted the nom de plume
of Saville, thinking of Saville House, Leicester
Square, and that Hunter is one of his family names.
The controversy respecting the authorship of
"God save the King" remained in this unsatis-
factory state until 1840, when, by a stroke of good
fortune, Clark purchased the book containing
Bull's "God save the King." Dr. Kitchener died
in February, 1827, leaving " particular injunctions
respecting the non-disposal of a certain MS. music-
book" — the volume containing Bull's compositions —
consequently this book was not included in the sale
of the doctor's library. Mr. Clark bought it for
£20, and shortly afterwards announced it to be a
" Collection of Pieces for the Virginals in the
veritable autograph of Dr. John Bull," which he had
carefully gone through, and "found that precisely
at the bar where Dr. Kitchener's published extract
concludes, the correct melody of the National
Anthem begins." Here again Clark made two
foolish blunders, for we shall presently find that
the MS. could not by any possibility have been in
Bull's autograph, and a reference to the index
previously given fully proves that the " God save
the King" which Kitchener had quoted was followed
by several pieces bearing neither reference nor
resemblance to the air we call the National Anthem.
In November, 1841, Clark addressed a printed
circular to the " Masters, Wardens," &c., of the
City Companies, in which he says :—
I continued my inquiries until eventually I was enabled to
obtain a sight of, and finally to purchase (in the handwriting
of the composer, Dr. John Bull), this long lost manuscript.
( 17 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
That the manuscript was not in the composer's
own hand may be ascertained by reference to the
list and indices of the Bull volumes, published in
Ward's " Lives of the Gresham Professors," where
the name of the Flemish scribe is quoted as part
of the "Large quarto, number 16 in the Catalogue."
At the end of this book is written the following
note: " Incepit 6 Apr. 1628, >finivit 20 Oct. 1628.
Scribebat Gulielmus a Messaus* Divae Walburgis
Antverpiensis phonascus." These dates are an
additional proof that the writings were not in
the autograph of Dr. Bull, for he died on the i2th
or I3th of March, 1628, and was buried in the
Church of Notre Dame, in Antwerp. I have
already mentioned the fact that I have carefully
examined one of the Bull volumes — that described
on page 206 of Ward's " Lives " — and I am
therefore able confidently to assert that it also is
in the hand of a Flemish scribe, and further, that
several of the pieces bear dates showing that they
were copied after Bull was dead and buried. In
1860, Sir Francis Madden examined the particular
volume which had belonged to Kitchener and Clark,
the one in which all our interest is now centred,
and he wrote respecting the contents : " Of course
they cannot be in the handwriting of Dr. John Bull,
but of some Dutchman." We may therefore, I
think, very fairly assume that all the Bull MSS.
spoken of by Ward were copies made by the same
scribe.
It is singular that, after having published so many
* For an account of Gulielmus a Messaus, see Appendix, page 99.
( 18 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
untenable statements respecting " God save the
King," Clark should have really discovered in his
recent purchase an "Ayre" bearing a remarkable
resemblance to the true melody; — that the re-
semblance was very apparent may be gathered from
the writings of Dr. Rimbault,* Dr. Gauntlett, Sir
George Smart, and Mr. William Chappell. The
last-named recorded his opinion in " Popular Music
of the Olden Time." He says : —
It is a curious fact (of which Clark could not have been aware
when he published his account) that an " Ayre " at page 98 of
the manuscript is very like our ' ' God save the King." The piece
which is therein entitled " God save the King " is at page 66, and
the same which Kitchener published. When Clark played the
"Ayre " to me, with the book before him, I thought it to be
the original of the National Anthem ; but afterwards, taking
the manuscript into my own hands, I was convinced that it had
been tampered with and the resemblance strengthened, the
sharps being in ink of a much darker colour than other parts.
The additions are very perceptible, in spite of Clark's having
covered the face of that portion with varnish. In its original
state the ' Ayre ' commenced with these notes : —
The G being natural, the resemblance to " God save the King "
does not strike the ear, but by making the G sharp, and
changing the whole from an old scale without sharps or flats
into the modern scale of A major (three sharps), the tune
becomes essentially like " God save the King." When I
reflected further upon the matter, it appeared very improbable
that Dr. Bull should have composed a piece for the organ in
the modern key of A major. The most curious part of the
* The late Dr. Rimbault has been quoted as a determined opponent to the
authorship of Bull. He doubtless was so up to 1841, but on examining the " Ayre "
he changed his opinion, and in 1855 published a short account of the National
Anthem, in which he strongly expressed his belief that Dr. Bull composed " God
save the King." (See Fly Leaves, by Edward F. Rimbault. 1855.)
( 19 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
resemblance between Dr. Bull's " Ayre " and " God save the
King" is that the first phrase consists of six bars and the second
of eight, which similarity does not exist in any other of the airs
from which it is supposed to have been taken. It is true that
the eight bars of the second phrase are made out by holding on
the final notes of the melody through two bars, therefore it
differs decidedly from all copies of our modern tune ; but the
words may be sung to Bull's " Ayre " by dividing the time of
the long notes — in fact, it has been so performed in public, before
the late King of Hanover, at the Concerts of Ancient Music,
and at other public concerts. The late R. Clark lent the voice-
parts, which had been used on these occasions, to Dr. Rimbault
for performance at his Lectures on Music in Liverpool. Dr.
Rimbault copied them in score for his own use, and has
favoured me with the following transcript : —
J-
r
From what I have said above it will be understood that in this
copy the " Ayre " has been transposed and changed into the
key of G major. The first note of the tune should (in this key)
be D, and instead of four G's at the end, the first G in the
( 20 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
thirteenth bar should be held through that and the fourteenth
to the termination of the tune. I have other doubts about the
accuracy of the copy, but cannot resolve them from memory,
and the permission to compare it with the original has been
refused.
Unfortunately the book containing Bull's " Ayre "
has disappeared, and whether it will ever again see
the light is somewhat doubtful ; but I am enabled to
supply a very efficient substitute. In my library is a
volume of miscellaneous music from the collection of
Sir George Smart ; its contents are oddly thrown
together, as will be seen from the following list : —
(1) " Mendelssohn's Midsummer Night's Dream Music."
(2) An address " To the lovers of research, the historian and
the impartial critic," by Richard Clark. (This was prepared
for a meeting of the Purcell Society, and endeavoured to prove
that " God save the King" was a popular melody in PurcelPs
time.)
(3) Sir George Smart's transcript of " God save the King "
from the Bull MS.
(4) " Reminiscences of Handel," by Richard Clark.
(5) " The Soldier's Dream," by Attwood, with manuscript
additions in the autograph of the composer.
(6) " The Soldier's Dream," printed copy incorporating the
additions previously mentioned.
(7) "The Incantation Scene" from Der Freischutz, with
MS. notes by Smart.
(8) " Kutusoff s Victory," by Cramer.
(9) Goss's " Collection of Chants."
(10) Mendelssohn's " Te Deum and Jubilate."
The third piece in this volume is " God save the
King," copied direct from the manuscript book of
Bull's compositions by Sir George Smart, who was
a most precise and careful man ; the accuracy of the
transcript may therefore be accepted as absolute.
See page 82 in the Appendix.
( 21 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
I would invite a careful comparison of the " Ayre,"
as faithfully copied for his own study and use by Sir
George Smart, with that which was prepared for the
hearing of the late King of Hanover "at the Concerts
of Ancient Music, and other public concerts." Doubt-
less the persistent endeavours to make up strong
evidence in favour of Bull engendered suspicion, and
must be considered most reprehensible. It is, more-
over, probable that Mr. Chappell is correct in his
surmise that Bull's " Ayre " had originally few or
no sharps. The insertion of these was somewhat
overdone, as may be seen by referring to bars 3, 4, 6,
7, 10, ir, 12, 13, 14 of Sir George Smart's transcript,
and as in the original index the piece is simply called
an "Air," the words "God save the King" were
probably added with the sharps. The like must be
said of the words "2 more verses."
In a long letter addressed by the late William
Chappell to myself, dated May 27, 1878, he
says : —
Let it be borne in mind that I had Bull's MS. to try over
and to value to Richard Clark, and to decide whether his offer
of £20 should be accepted or not. I saw Bull's MS. after
Clark had varnished it, as well as before. The few who saw it
after me confirm my testimony that it had been garbled. Pray
mark that the four bars of resemblance created by Dr.
Gauntlett, are in the older carol (Remember, O thou man).
I am sure it was Gauntlett, from his visits to me, and his
attempts at cross-questioning me. Richard Clark was a poor
thing in music, and could not have had nous enough. Clark
could sing from the Bass clef, but although he must have had
months of practice at Bull's "Ayre," transmuted, before he
attempted to play it to me, he had to look at his fingers and
then at the book in every chord, and could not even then play
it correctly.
( 22 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Mr. Chappell's suggestion that Dr. Gauntlett was
Clark's adviser is borne out by the following circular
or prospectus issued in October, 1841 : —
NEVER BEFORE PUBLISHED.
The manuscript compositions of John Bull, Doctor of Music,
Organist to the Chapels Royal in the reign of Elizabeth;
Organist and Chamber Musician to James the first, and
Professor of Music to the Gresham College. Born 1565. Died
1622.*
Mr. Richard Clark, of her Majesty's Chapels Royal, St.
Paul's Cathedral, and Westminster Abbey, has the honour to
announce to the lovers of classical music, a proposal for
publishing by subscription the compositions of Dr. John Bull,
contained in that valuable manuscript formerly in the posses-
sion of Dr. Pepusch (an account of which is given in Ward's
History of the Professors of Gresham College, 1740), and
which has successively formed a great object of attraction and
curiosity in the Libraries of Mr. Edward Jones, Bard to His
Majesty King George the third, Mr. James Bartleman, and
Dr. Kitchener, of whose son Mr. Clark has purchased the
entire interest.
Dr. Bull's reputation as a composer and as an organist
extended during his lifetime to the capitals of Holland, France
and Germany, and he may justly be considered the Henry
Purcel of the latter half of the eighteenth century.* It is
presumed the publication of this interesting manuscript will
tend to throw a new light on the extraordinary genius and
acquirements of one of the earliest and most celebrated
musicians of which this country can boast; and it will
materially assist in demonstrating that in the reign of
Elizabeth there first appeared those great harmonies and
combinations of notes, which it has been the habit of many
Professors to attribute to the later period of Henry Purcel, and
the still later one of Sebastian Bach. To the musical antiquary,
to the historian of the rise and progress of the science, and to
the lover of pure classical compositions for the organ, it is
anticipated this work will be an object of peculiar regard and
veneration.
* A curious error. Bull died in 1628, the beginning of the i;th century.
( 23 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
It also exhibits another and if possible still more interesting
claim on the attention and patronage of the musical public,
as it contains the National Air of God save the King, composed
for Four Parts. This is written in 3 time, and the melody is,
with one or two exceptions, precisely the same as is now in
use; and it is but justice to the memory of Dr. Bull, its
composer, to state that his reputation may be considered to
have suffered from the claims which have unjustly been made
for various persons as the Composer, and from the slight
alteration which has arisen from the lapse of time, and the
want of an authentic copy as a reference.
It is necessary to observe that the movement extracted from
this MS. and published by Dr. Kitchener, in what he calls his
" Loyal and National Songs of England," as God save the
King is not the melody referred to, and that the Doctor's
extract is merely certain variations on a few notes, probably
used as the introductory Music to the King and vast company
invited to Merchant Tailors' Hall, 1607, and only as a flourish
for the Cornets or Trumpets in the State and City Bands. In
addition to this great curiosity, there are twenty-seven other
compositions, including many fugues, canons and variations
for the fine old Gregorian Hymns, " Gloria tibi Trinitas,"—
" Sal vat or Mundi Domini," — "Felise namque Offertorium,"
&c.
Mr. Clark pledges himself to adhere closely to the manu-
script, which is in every respect a very beautiful one ; to
transpose the different clefs (of which there are eleven) into the
two clefs now in general use ; to have the work engraved in a
handsome and bold manner, and to accompany it with engraved
portraits of Dr. Bull, from the painting in the music-school,
Oxford, King James the first, and Ben Jonson. An intro-
ductory Preface will precede the Music from the pen of
Mr. Henry John Gauntlett.
Price to subscribers, one guinea, to non-subscribers two
guineas. The work will be published by Mr. Chappell, 50,
New Bond Street, Publishers to the Musical Antiquarian
Society. Subscriptions in advance will be received only by
Mr. Clark, Litlington Tower, Cloisters, Westminster Abbey,
and Mr. Chappell. Subscribers' names will be given.
This proposed publication was never issued, pos-
sibly for want of sufficient subscribers.
( 24 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Looking at the copy of Bull's "Air" on page 82,
we may admit that the "sharps," "title," and the
words, " 2 more verses," were modern additions,
and still believe that, whether read in the minor
or major mode, we have in Bull's composition
the first suggestion of the music of our National
Anthem. There is an identity in rhythm and
melody; the mode, major or minor, is of little
importance.*
The first part of the tune or melody is made up of
six bars or measures, phrased in groups of two ; the
second part of the tune, also grouped in twos,
consists of eight bars. This is a variation of the old
form of the dance known as the " Galliard," which
originally consisted of two parts, each made up of
eight bars in triple time. About the year 1600,
composers began to permit themselves liberties in
the number of bars. Some Galliards by Bull,
containing six and eight bars, as in "God save the
King," are still extant. f
A change of the mode from minor to major is, as
already stated, a matter of little consequence ; all
Cathedral musicians are familiar with what are
termed " changeable chants," that is to say, chants
so composed that they may be played major or minor
at pleasure, without alteration of the letter-notes,
requiring only the addition or omission of sharps,
* I possess a large number of variations composed on God save the King,
written by musicians from the time of J. C. Bach to Thalberg, and I find that
nearly all these composers give one variation in the minor mode.
t The name Galliard seems to have fallen into disuse before the i8th century,
but the spirit and peculiar two-bar phrase in triple time survived. An excellent
specimen is the " Sarabande in E minor, in Handel's " Suite de Pieces,"
published in 1720.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
flats, and naturals. Some of our popular folk-songs
are sung in like manner, both in major and minor,
notably " The bailiff's daughter of Islington " and
" Huntingtower."
In April, 1860, Sir Francis Madden sent a letter to
Mr. Chappell, from which I extract the following : —
The MS. formerly belonging to Mr. Richard Clark, and
which you have mentioned at some length in your work, has
been offered to me for purchase. I have looked at it again
carefully, and am of opinion (as I formerly was) that the lower
part of page 98 is in a much later hand than the rest of the
volume, and also that the pretended reference to page 98 on
another page is a recent addition to the original flourish.
Sir Francis Madden speaks of a "pretended
reference to page 98 on another page." It is just
possible this may have been added when the pro-
gramme of Bull's music for performance, before the
King of Hanover, was in preparation.
It will be interesting here to present a complete
copy of the programme referred to : —
By command of
His MAJESTY THE KING OF HANOVER,
At Christ Church, Newgate Street,
August 3, 1843.
Selections from the
ORGAN AND VOCAL MUSIC.
Composed by
DR. JOHN BULL,
Professor of Music in Gresham College, Organist of the Chapels
Royal in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, and Organist and
Chamber Musician to his Majesty King James the First.
Born 1563. Died 1622.*
* An error. Dr. Bull died in 1628.
( 26 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
No. I. Vorspiele, or Prelude in Four Parts, composed by
Dr. Bull, on the Lutheran Choral Hymn, " Vater unser im
Himmelreich." The Melody is placed in the Tenor or Third
Part, and is performed by the Obligate* Pedal. It is composed
in the Doric Key of the Ancient Church Tones. The MSS. in
the possession of Mr. Richard Clark.
No. II. The same Choral — taken from the original Choral
Book of Dr. Martin Luther, 1540 ; and harmonised in Four
Parts, by John Sebastian Bach, 1750.
No. III. Four Movements selected from the original MSS.
of Dr. Bull, in the possession of Mr. Richard Clark, of Her
Majesty's Chapels Royal, and of St. Paul's and Westminster
Abbey ; and in the original Virginal Book of Queen Elizabeth
in the FitzwilHam Museum, Cambridge.
1. Ayre in the Key C ; in f time.
2. Air varied in C ; in Common time.
3. Ayre in C ; in £ time.
4. Andante in F ; in Common time.
No. IV. Prayer for the King, from the original MSS. of Dr.
Bull, on a Gregorian Melody, with Obligate* Organ Accom-
paniment. " O Lord Almighty God, whose righteousness is
like the strong mountains, and Thy judgments like the great
deep : after the multitude of Thy mercies save the King who
puts his trust in Thee, and evermore mightily defend him for
Jesus Christ His sake ; to whom with Thee and the Holy
Ghost be all honour and glory. Amen."
No. V. Prelude and Ayre in G Major, composed by Dr. Bull,
from the Virginal Book in the FitzwilHam Museum, Cambridge.
No. VI. The original Music of the National Anthem, "God
save th« King," composed and performed by Dr. Bull on the
occasion of His Majesty King James's visit to Merchant
Taylors' Hall, 1607, in commemoration of his escape from the
Powder Plot.
1. The Prelude, or Introduction to the National Anthem for
the Organ, with an Obligate* Trumpet Accompaniment.
2. The National Anthem in its original form, note for note,
from the MSS. in the possession of Mr. Richard Clark.
The Vocal Music will be sung by Miss Rainforth ; Masters
Stevens and Sullivan; Messrs. Young, Bayley, Howe, Lockey,
Bradbury, Allen, and R. Clark.
Organ — DR. GAUNTLETT.
[Manning & Mason, Printers, Ivy Lane.]
* Sic.
( 27 ) C
GOD SAVE THE KING.
The sixth number in the above programme con-
sisted of (i) the Prelude or Introduction to the
National Anthem for the organ, with an obbligato
trumpet accompaniment.
A reference to the music of Bull's " God save the
Kinge" (page 73) will show that it would be a matter
of difficulty for a solo player to perform it on the
organ as written. The addition of a trumpet
obbligato, to play the notes of the plain-song
C, G, F, E, would therefore be most judicious and
effective, and leave the organist free to deal with the
elaborate variations. It should also be noted that,
although Bull's " God save the Kinge " commences
in the key of C major, and is for the most part
written in that mode, yet the closing variations are
in A, and the final chord, of A major, would fittingly
introduce "the National Anthem in its original form,
note for note, from the MSS. in the possession of
Mr. Richard Clark " (page 82).
On June 16, 1876, I called on Mrs. Clark, the
widow of Richard Clark, at the house where she
was then residing (Dr. Ray's Collegiate School,
Queen's Road, Peckham), with the hope of obtaining
some information from her, and on the possibility
of being permitted to examine the book containing
Bull's music. Mrs. Clark told me the MS. had
been offered to the Queen, the British Museum,
and also to Miss Charlotte Dolby, the well-known
contralto vocalist, for the sum of £100, but they
having declined to purchase, the book had been
disposed of. In the following September, I wrote to
Mrs. Clark, offering to purchase the volume, and
( 28 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
asking for help in collecting memoranda respecting
" God save the King," the only result being the
following note : —
Dear Sir, — At your interview with me I told you the book
in question was disposed of, and as regards your other request
I cannot assist you ; my great age prevents it.
Yours respectfully,
Sept. 14, 1874. H. CLARK.
Mrs. Clark, in the letter, speaks of her great age.
One of the evidences of her failing powers is the date
she gave, 1874, whereas it should have been 1876 —
this is shown by the post-office stamp on the cover,
still in my possession.
Mrs. Clark died at 46, Queen's Road, Peckham,
on March 12, 1885, and was buried in the grave of
her husband in Brompton Cemetery. The book in
question has not since been heard of.
It is impossible to fix accurately the time of the
first print and publication of the music and words of
" God save the King." We find in the Gentleman's
Magazine, October, 1745, a version with three verses
commencing "God save great George our King"; but
an older version, " God save our Lord the King," is to
be found in the first edition, undated, of—
THESAURUS Musicus. A collection of two, three and
four-part songs ; several of them never before printed. To
which are added some Choice Dialogues, set to music by the
most eminent masters viz., Dr. Blow, H. Purcell, Handel,
Dr. Green, Dl Purcell, Eccles, Weldon, Leveridge, Lampe,.
Carey, &c. The whole revis'd, carefully corrected and figur'd
by a judicious master. London, Printed for, and sold by John
Simpson, at the Bass Viol and Flute in Sweeting's Alley,
Opposite the East door of the Royal Exchange.
Printed probably in 1740. The first line, " God save
( 29 ) C2
GOD SAVE THE KING.
our Lord the King," shows that it preceded the
version sung at Drury Lane Theatre in 1745, when
the first lines were " God save our noble King, God
save great George our King."
The music as printed in the first edition of
" Thesaurus Musicus" will be found in the Appendix,
page 83. The Flute part is arranged in the key
of F (showing that it was intended for the Old
English flute). The only heading to the above
is " For two voices." In the second edition of
" Thesaurus Musicus " the piece is again printed on
page 22, but from a plate entirely re-engraved, with
the added title, "A Loyal Song, sung at the Theatres
Royal." This must therefore have been published
after the performances at Drury Lane and Covent
Garden Theatres in 1745. We may reasonably
conclude that the copy in the first edition was
published before it had been given at the Theatres.
This second edition differs, both in music and words,
from the first edition (see Appendix, page 84). The
third edition of " Thesaurus Musicus " contains the
words and music printed on page 22, again newly
engraved, with an alteration in the second line of the
second verse, which reads " Scatter our Enemies."
A fourth edition of "Thesaurus Musicus " was pub-
lished by " R. Bremner, at the Harp and Hautboy,
opposite Somerset House in the Strand," but no
further change is made in " God save the King."
In Chappell's "Old English Popular Music," edited
by Professor H. Ellis Wooldridge (1893), the copy
there given of " God save our Lord the King " is said
to be taken from the " Harmonia Anglicana," 1742 (?),
( 30 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
with the editorial note : " The Harmonia Anglicana
is printed without date, but a clue to the time of
publication is obtained in the following way. There
are several works advertised by the publishers on
the title page, and three or four more seem to have
been added subsequently to fill up vacant space on
the index plate. The last of these are ' Two col-
lections of favourite Scotch tunes, set for a violin,
German flute, or harpsichord ; by Mr. Oswald.'
These two collections were advertised in November,
1742."
This evidence is of no value. The first, second,
and third editions of " Thesaurus Musicus " have
precisely the same titles and advertisements.*
In the " Thesaurus " I also find, on page 65, " A
two-part song on the approaching nuptials of the
Prince of Orange and the Princess Royal of Great
Britain." The marriage referred to took place in
the Lutheran Chapel, adjoining St. James's Palace,
March 14, 173!, when Anne, eldest daughter of
George II., was united to William Charles Henry,
Prince of Nassau and Orange. (Memorials of St.
James's Palace. By the Rev. Edgar Sheppard. 1894.)
If we were to accept this reference to " approach-
ing nuptials " (an event which took place in 1734)
as proof that the book was published before that
date, we should be greatly misled. The truth is,
" Thesaurus Musicus " was printed from plates
which had been engraved and published at various
periods. Of the existence of the " Harmonia
* These three editions have the words " Musick, just published " by
J. Simpson, preceding the list, which is precisely the same in all; a sure
proof that the advertisements are of no value in fixing the date of publication.
( 31 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Anglicana," described by Mr. Chappell and Professor
Wooldridge, I have great doubt. The only work
with this title known to me, is an oblong folio, of
which I possess a copy. The title is as follows : —
HARMONIA ANGLICANA or the Musick of the English Stage,
Containing Six sets of Ayres and Tunes in 4 Parts, made for
the Operas Tragedys and Comedyes of the Theater Royal.
The first collection which will be continued with the sets of
Tunes made for the Play Houses and other Occasions.
Engraven in a fair Character. London. Printed and sold
by J. Walsh, Musicall Instrument Maker in Ordinary to his
Majesty at ye Golden Harp & Hoboy in Catherine Street near
Sumerset House in ye Strand and J. Hare Musicall Instru-
ment Maker at the Golden Viol in St Pauls Church yard & at
his Shop in Freeman's yard near ye Exchange in Cornhill.*
There is no tune of "God save the King" in
this book, nor has it anything in common with
the upright folio volumes known as " Thesaurus
Musicus."
The first recorded public performance of "God
save the King " appears in the Daily Advertiser of
Monday, September 30, 1745 : " On Saturday night
last, the audience at the Theatre Royal, Drury
Lane, were agreeably surprized by the Gentlemen
belonging to that House performing the Anthem
of God save our noble King. The universal
Applause it met with, being encored with repeated
Huzzas, sufficiently denoted in how just an
Abhorrence they hold the arbitrary Schemes of
our insidious Enemies, and detest the despotick
Attempts of Papal power." The immense popularity
the words and music immediately obtained induced
* I wrote to Mr. Chappell in 1886, asking where he had seen the " Harmonia
Anglicana." He was only able to refer me to the work here described.
( 32 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
the managers of other theatres to follow the example
set by Drury Lane, and we find an advertisement
in the General Advertiser, October 2, 1745 : " At
the Theatre in Goodman's Fields, by desire, God
save the King, as it was performed at the Theatre
Royal, Drury Lane, with great applause." At this
house the Anthem seems to have been performed
nightly up to November 14. The Theatre Royal,
Covent Garden, followed suit, and we read in the
General Advertiser, December 24, 25, and 26, 1745,
an advertisement of the performances at that house,
which concludes with the following words : " And
at the play, God save the King."
The arrangement of the National Anthem sung
at Drury Lane was made by Dr. Arne, and that for
Covent Garden by his pupil, Dr. Burney. The
manuscript of the former exists in Arne's autograph,
and is interesting and admirable ; it was sung as a
trio by Mrs. Gibber, Mr. Beard, and Mr. Reinhold,*
each part repeated in chorus. (For Arne's arrange-
ment, see Appendix, p. 85.)
Of the enthusiasm of the public at these per-
formances we have a graphic account in the
published letters of Benjamin Victor, in one of which,
addressed to David Garrick, October 10, 1745,
* Mrs. Gibber, sister of Dr. Arne, and wife of Theophilus Cibber, was the
contralto singer for whom Handel composed the airs in the "Messiah" and
" Samson." Born in 1714, she died in 1766, and was buried in the north cloister
of Westminster Abbey.
John Beard, an eminent tenor singer, engaged by Handel in 1736 for per-
formances of "Alexander's Feast," "Acis and Galatea," and " Atalanta." He
died in 1791, in his 74th year.
Thomas Reinhold, a native of Dresden, engaged by Handel as bass soloist for
" Israel in Egypt," " Samson," " Semele," " Belshazzar," and other oratorios.
He died in 1751.
( 33 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
he says : " The stage, at both houses, is the most
pious, as well as the most loyal place in the three
kingdoms. Twenty men appear at the end of every
play ; and one, stepping forward from the rest, with
uplifted hands and eyes, begins singing, to an old
anthem tune, the following words : —
O Lord our God, arise !
Confound the enemies
Of George, our King !
Send him victorious,
Happy and glorious,
Long to reign over us,
God save the King !
Which are the very words, and music, of an old
Anthem that was sung at St. James's Chapel, for
King James the Second, when the Prince of Orange
was landed, to deliver us from popery and slavery ;
which God Almighty in His goodness was pleased
not to grant." (Original Letters and Poems. By
Benjamin Victor. 1766.)
Another interesting notice of a performance is to
be found in a letter of Horace Walpole, dated
August 5, 1746 : " I saw the company get into
their barges at Whitehall Stairs, as I was going
myself, and just then passed by two City Companies
in their great barges, who had been a swan hopping.
They laid by, and played ' God save our noble
King,' and altogether it was a mighty pretty show."
(Letters of Horace Walpole. By P. Cunningham.
I857-9-)
It is to be noted that at the time of its performance,
in 1745, neither Dr. Burney nor Dr. Arne were able
( 34 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
to say who was the composer of the Air, for Burney
tells us that when Arne was interrogated on the
subject he answered, "He had not the least know-
ledge, nor could he guess at all, who was either the
author or composer, but that it was a received
opinion that it was written for the Catholic Chapel
of James II."; and Burney added his own opinion
in these words : " We believe that it was written for
King James II., while the Prince of Orange was
hovering over the coast ; and when he became King,
who durst own or sing it ? "
Burney must have continued his enquiries
respecting the origin of the Anthem, as will be seen
by the following letter, the original autograph of
which is in my possession.
This letter, now for the first time printed, was
addressed to Sir Joseph Banks : —
Chelsea College,
2gth July, 1806.
Dear Sir, — Previous to my plunging into a subject which
requires considerable discussion, let me refer you to the article
Balnea, in the Monthly Review, for July, 1799, p. 356,* in
which the author asserts that his father, Harry Carey, not only
wrote the words but composed the music to " God save great
George our King."
Now, taking it for granted that you have perused the article
referred to in the Review (of which, in confidence to you, dear
sir, and to you only, except Lord Macartney, I confess myself
to be the author), I shall proceed to tell you all I know con-
cerning the history of this loyal song, of which I do not
recollect that I have made any particular mention in my
general history of music. The assertion of Carey being the
author of God save the King is again denied in the Monthly
Review for April, 1800, p. 419. t
* For a reprint of this article see page 55. t See page 56.
( 35 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Old Mrs. Arne, the mother of Dr. Arne, and Mrs. Cibber, a
bigotted Roman Catholic, assured me at the time, 1746, that
" God save the King " was written and sung for King jfames,
in 1688, when the Prince of Orange was hovering over the
coast ; she said she had heard it sung, not only at the Play-
house but in the Street. Her son, Mr. Arne, composer to Drury
Lane Theatre, at the desire of Mr. Fleetwood, the Patentee,
harmonized this loyal song for the stage, and he made a Trio
of it for Mrs. Cibber, Beard, and Rheinhold, with instrumental
accompaniments without knowing the author of the words or
original melody, and it continued to be sung and called for a
full year after the suppression of the rebellion. I, then a pupil
of Mr. Arne, was desired by some of the Covent Garden
singers with whom I was acquainted, and who knew that I was
a bit of a composer, to set parts to the old tune for the new
house, as it was then called, which I did utterly ignorant who
wrote the words or put them to music. And it seems as if the
author, or authors, fearful of discovering themselves, after King
William had ascended the throne, quitted the world without
having their merit recorded. There are many conjectures
concerning the source of this loyal production, but they are
mere conjectures. A Monkish version of this kind of Hymn
in Latin, is pretended to have been written and sung for
Charles the ad., but how could any case of Carolus (or
Carolous) be made a monosyllable to go to the present tune ?
God save great Charles, James, or George, equally suit the
melody and English measure of the words, and I pretend not
to swear that they were expressly written for James ; but am
most certain that they were sung for him at the time above-
mentioned, and enough is known to satisfy us that it is not a
production of the i8th Century.
I have the honour to be with the highest respect and regard,
dear sir,
Your most obliged and faithful servant,
CHAS. BURNEY.
This autograph letter was in the possession ' of Sir
Thomas Phillipps, Middle Hill, Worcestershire. I
purchased it with other papers of Bernard Quaritch.
Amongst these are the following notes in the hand-
( 36 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
writing of Sir Joseph Banks, which are worthy of
preservation : —
That the loyal and popular Hymn of " God save the King "
was originally written and composed for the advancement of
Popery and Jacobitism is scarcely credible, and yet it is all but
certain.
It first appeared or rather re-appeared in our day in 1746,*
on the return of the Duke of Cumberland from the suppression
of the rebellion of 1745, and Mr. Arne, composer to Drury
Lane Theatre, harmonized it for the stage, where it was sung
as a trio by Mrs. Gibber, Beard and Rheinold, with instrumental
accompaniment.
Old Mrs. Arne, a bigotted Roman Catholic, the mother of
Mr. Arne who harmonized it, and of Mrs. Cibber who performed
in the trio, remembered it being sung in the Streets and
performed in the Playhouse in 1688, when the wretched James
was in hourly expectation of the arrival of King William. The
words afford strong evidence in favour of Mrs. Arne's recol-
lection, if it need any support, when the fact of her son who
harmonized it never being deemed to be the composer of it is
recollected.
That a King whom God is so earnestly called upon to save
must have been in some danger seems evident. The second
stanza makes it appear that this danger arose from political
enmity and popular disaffection. Confound their politicks
frustrate their knavish tricks.
That the earnestness with which the direct interference of
the divinity in favour of the King is repeatedly implored ; the
total silence that reigns throughout the whole respecting the
established religion of the Church, and the supreme excellence
of the melody, which is in the best choral style, savour much
more of concealed Popery than of avowed Protestantism, for
surely no one who preferred the established religion of a
country would forego the use of that powerful instrument in
an attempt to excite a national enthusiasm which this song
most evidently is. Curious it is that it failed entirely to
produce the effect intended by the author, and has succeeded
beyond all example in producing the direct contrary one : it is
* An error ; it should be 1745.
( 37 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
possible that the expression in the last stanza of " mav he
defend our laws," rather a singular wish in England when
neither coupled with Liberty or Religion, may be read into
some of the later proclamations of that much misguided
Monarch.
The words God save the King are a literal translation of
the Domine salvum fac Regem, and without much perversion
may be construed in the double sense of God preserve his
body from the danger that threatens it, and his soul also, by
giving him wisdom to embrace what the writer conceived to
be the proper means of salvation.
In Dr. Burney's letter, already quoted (p. 36), he
says : " A Monkish version of this kind of Hymn in
Latin, is pretended to have been written and sung
for Charles the 2d-- but how could any case of Carolus
(or Carolous) be made a monosyllable to go to the
present tune ? "
Dr. Burney's difficulty is entirely removed in
the following Latin lines, with which he was
unacquainted —
LATIN CHORUS.
I.
O Deus Optime !
Salvum nunc facito
Regem nostrum ;
Sit la?ta victoria,
Comes et gloria,
Salvum jam facito,
Tu Dominum.
n.
Exurgat Dominus ;
Rebelles dissipet,
Et reprimat ;
Dolos Confundito ;
Fraudes depellito ;
In te sit sita Spes !
O ! Salva Nos.
( 38 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Anglicised —
i.
O good God, preserve our King in safety ;
Let joyful Victory and Glory be his constant Companions.
O God ! save our King.
n.
O God arise ! disperse the Rebellious, and suppress them ;
Confound their Devices, and frustrate their Schemes, for
in Thee we place our Hopes.
O save us all !
This Latin chorus and the English version fill
two pages of a word-book (to be described later),
without title-page, which commences on page I as
follows : —
ACT I.
Overture of Esther.
Canzonet for Two Voices
Compos'd by Mr. Travers.
Concerto Hautboy.
Song compos'd by Mr. Travers.
Concerto Violoncello.
Fourth Concerto of Corelli.
ACT II.
Ode on the Birth-day
Of Her Royal Highness
The Princess of Wales
Compos'd by Mr. Travers ;
To conclude with
A LATIN CHORUS.
The second page is blank, then follows on page 3
the canzonet, " I, my dear, was born to-day," by
Prior, the music composed by Travers ; on page 4,
song, " When vernal airs perfume the fields," com-
posed by Travers ; on page 5, "Ode on the Birthday
of Her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales ;
( 29 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
composed in the year 1743." The words of this
ode are continued on pages 6, 7, 8, and 9. The
Latin chorus and the translation, on pages 10 and n,
complete the book.
It is evident that this book of words was prepared
for a performance given on November 28, 1743,
the birthday of the Princess Augusta, wife of
Frederick, Prince of Wales, probably at her private
residence. John Travers, the composer of the music
of the birthday ode, had been appointed organist of
the Chapels Royal in 1737. Travers was a favourite
pupil of Dr. Pepusch, who then possessed the several
MS. volumes containing Bull's musical compositions.
Pepusch bequeathed his library to his pupils, John
Travers and Ephraim Kelner. The words of the
Latin chorus so accurately fit the music of our
National Anthem, that we must conclude they are
those which were originally sung. Whether Travers
obtained his copy of the music, with the Latin
words, for the concert of 1743 from the Chapel
Royal, or from Dr. Pepusch's library, cannot now
be ascertained.
It will be well here to describe the volume which
contains the birthday word-book : it is lettered on
the back " Academy, 1730 " ; on the inside of the
cover it has the autograph signature " R. J. S.
Stevens, Charterhouse," and in his handwriting
the following index : —
Academy of Ancient Music, Jan. 31, 1733.
„ Dec. 19, 1734.
Handel's Song of Moses, May 10, 1739.
Handel's Esther, Feb. 24, 1742.
Ode to Love and Wine (Purcell).
( 40 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Joseph by Defesch, 1745.
Concert chiefly by Travers,
Academy of Ancient Music, April 24, 1746.
March 29, 1750.
Feb. 28, 1751.
Feb. 27, 1755.
April 29, 1756.
May 5, 1757.
March i, 1759.
Nov. 29, 1759.
April 13, 1775.
Jan. 19, 1786.
May n, 1786.
Feb. 3, 1791.
The word-books are of various sizes, some have
had their edges cut, but the birthday-book is uncut.
It is quite evident that the collection was bound up
for Stevens. The volume belonged to the late
Dr. Rimbault, and was lot 3 at the sale of his
library in 1877, when I purchased it. Dr. Rimbault
made a communication to Notes and Queries, on
April 29, 1876, in which he described the book
as " a curious volume of word-books issued by the
old Academy of Ancient Music between the years
1733 and 1791." This is, as I have shown, quite
erroneous ; the index proves that five of the word-
books had nothing to do with the "Academy."
Dr. Rimbault alludes to the remarkable fact that
" the learned Directors of the Academy were unable
to give the name of the composer of the Latin
chorus," but as it had no connection with their
concerts, they probably had never seen or heard
of it.
We have seen that " God save our noble King"
was received with enthusiasm at Drury Lane
( 41 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Theatre in September, 1745, and the rapidity with
which it became universally popular suggests that
the tune and some version of the words must have
been familiar in certain sections of society. Three
years later, in 1748, the following parody of the
words appeared in a newspaper advertisement : —
" Extempore Catch for the Westminster Fish
Market, to the tune of ' God save the King ' —
O may this market thrive
Whilst there's a fish alive ;
Nature's best treat
Each knavish art decrease,
Monopolising cease,
That men of all degrees
May turbot eat."
In 1750 a satirical poem was published, entitled
"The Scandalizade," in which occur the following
lines : —
Ho ! there, to whom none can forsooth hold a candle,
Called the lovely-faced Heidegger out to George Handel,
In arranging the poet's sweet lines to a tune,
Such as God save the King ! or the famed Tenth of June.
In 1754, John Sadler, the inventor of printing on
earthenware, published a book with the following
title: —
THE MUSES DELIGHT. An accurate collection of English
and Italian Songs, Cantatas and Duetts, set to music for the
Harpsichord, Violin, German-flute, &c., with instructions for
the Voice, Violin, Harpsichord or Spinnet, German-flute,
Common-flute, Hautboy, French-horn, Bassoon and Bass-
Violins : also, a Compleat Musical Dictionary, and several
Hundred English, Irish and Scots songs, without the music.
Liverpool : Printed, Published and Sold by John Sadler, in
Harrington St. M,DCC,LIV.
( 42 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
In the same year, whether earlier or later there is
no evidence to show, the work was published in
London, the only variation being the title-page, where
it reads "and upwards of Four Hundred English,
Irish and Scots Songs, without the music. London :
Printed by Henry Purcell,* at Handel's Head, in
Wood-street. M,DCC,LIV." Another edition of
the book, with additions, in two volumes, was pub-
lished by Sadler, in Liverpool, in 1756. On page
152 of all these volumes we find " A loyal song, for
two voices," which, so far as the music is concerned,
presents a copy of that in the second edition of
" Thesaurus Musicus," but the words differ in some
respects. A second verse reads —
O grant that Cumberland
May, by his mighty hand,
Victory bring ;
May he sedition hush,
And like a torrent rush,
Rebellious hearts to crush,
God save the King.
The third verse " O Lord our God, arise," is
without change, but the fourth ends as follows :—
Thy choicest gifts in store,
On him be pleas'd to pour,
Long may he reign ;
May he defend our laws,
And ever give us cause
To cry with loud applause,
God save the King.
A single sheet song, with the title " God save the
King," commencing "Fame, let thy trumpet sound,"
* Probably a grandson of the great composer.
( 43 ) D
GOD SAVE THE KING.
printed from copper-plate, which must have been
circulated about this time, is interesting, as showing
the penultimate bar of the melody in modern form,
and also indicating repeats of the first and second
parts. It is curious also as giving, according to
ancient fashion, the melody in the Tenor, as well as
a new version of words.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
TREBLE.
P
I I-
Fame, let thy trum - pet sound, Tell all the world a-round,
CONTRALTO.
Fame, let thy trum - pet sound, Tell all the world a-round,
TENOR. tr
B=3=3?FF?Jlr r H^^
Fame, let thy . . trum - pet sound, Tell all the world a-round
BASS.
t?t F^-F f I — ~ » » — I F F I* I * ' »-
Fame, let thy trum - pet sound, Tell all the world a-round,
*: *at"
Great George is King. Tell Rome and France and Spain, Brit-an - nia
=g±=a; r I
Great Ge'orge is King. Tell Rome and France and Spain, Brit-an - nia
tr
Great George is King. Tell Rome and France and Spain, Brit-an - nia
^Great George is King. Te!l Rome and Franceand Spain, Brit-an - nia
( 44 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
scorns their chain, All their vile arts are vain, Great George is King.
-f—
scorns their chain, All their vile arts are vain, Great George is King.
scorns their chain, All their vile arts are vain, Great George is King.
scorns their chain, All their vile arts are vain, Great George is King.
May Heav'n his life defend,
And make his race exstend,
Wide as his Fame.
Thy Choicest Blefsings shed,
On his most Sacred head,
And make his Foes to dread,
Great George's name.
3
He Peace and Plenty brings,
While ROME'S deluded KINGS,
Waste and destroy.
Then let his People SING,
Long live great GEORGE our KING,
From whom such Blefsings spring,
Freedom and Joy.
None of these publications had a composer's name
appended to 'the air, and it was not until the year
1795 that George Saville Carey claimed the author-
ship for his deceased father, Henry Carey. It is
probable the claim would not have been made at all,
but for the hope he entertained that the King would
grant a pension to him for his father's assumed
( 45 ) 02
GOD SAVE THE KING.
loyal service on behalf of the Crown. A yearly
pension of £"200 had just been granted to Charles
Dibdin* on account of the services he had rendered
to the nation by the composition of his famous naval
and patriotic songs ; and if Carey could have proved
his father's claim to the authorship of " God save
the King," he might clearly have anticipated some
consideration at the hands of the King and the
Government.
George Saville Carey shall tell his own story, as
given in "The Balnea" (1799), page no, where,
speaking of a fashionable seaside resort, he says :—
When the Royal family make their first entrance into
Weymouth, every summer season, the inhabitants, out of
compliment, cover the pavement with small pebbles from the
sea-shore, which has generally the effect of endangering your
eyes, or breaking the parlour windows of all the houses in the
street ; for as the party is numerous, and the horses driven
along at a furious pace, their hoofs, tipping the pebbles before
them, make them fly as thick as hail, and as sharp almost as
a small bullet shot from a pistol.
Yet, notwithstanding all the apparent zeal of the natives of
Weymouth, one would think they in reality did not care a
straw for the Royal visitors ; otherwise these Gothamites, if
they truly wished to make their Sovereign's entrance easy,
would have bestowed a bundle or two of the above commodity
for the sake of his family, their friends' eyes, their neighbours'
windows, and the general safety of His Majesty's subjects.
Being thrown into this situation once myself, with my head
uncovered like an obedient subject, I was under the necessity
of turning my back upon my betters, for the sake of saving my
face ; it was at a time when I had an idea of addressing his
Majesty in respect to my father being the author of " God
save great George our King.'' I had no evil in rny mind, like
Macbeth, yet " the very stones seem'd to prate at my where-
about," for they rose from the pavement in such vollies, and
pelted me hip and thigh at such a rate, that I could not help
* See a reference by Dibdin to " God save the King," page 122.
( 46 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
bringing to mind that passage in the Scriptures where it is
said, " I asked for bread, and he gave me a stone !" As it has
been whispered abroad, nay, even in print, that an annuity of
two hundred pounds per annum had been bestowed on me in
consequence of my father being the author of " God save great
George our King," I think it a duty incumbent on me to
acquaint the world that no such consideration has ever yet
transpired ; yet I must beg that my readers will give me leave
to introduce a few lines on this subject. In spite of all literary
cavil and conjectural assertions, there has not yet appeared
one identity to invalidate the truth of my father's being the
author of the important song ; some have given the music to
Handel, others to Purcell ; some have signified that it was
produced in the time of Charles I., others in James I. ; and
some in their slumbers have dreamed that it made its appear-
ance in the reign of Henry VIII. It might as well have been
carried still further back, to the wicked reign of Saul, or the
wiser one of song-singing Solomon, the son of the psalm-
singing David. I have heard the late Mr. Pearce Galliard, an
able counsellor in the law, and a colleague of my father's, who
died some years ago at Southampton, assert, time after time,
that my father was the author of " God save the King," that
it was produced in the year forty-five and six ;* another friend
presented it to me in its original state, bound up with a col-
lection of songs for two and three voices, set to music by Mr.
Handel, Dr. Blow, Mr. Leveridge, Dr. Greene, Mr. Eccles,
Mr. Lampe, Daniel Purcell, Mr. Corfe, and Henry Carey,
printed in the year 1750 for John Johnson, opposite Bow
Church, in Cheapside;f it precedes another song of my father's,
beginning with —
" He comes, he comes, the Hero comes,
Sound, sound your trumpets, beat your drums," &c.
But for the satisfaction of my readers, I will insert the song of
" God save great George our King," as it is printed in the
original text, where it is called a song for two voices, and
runs thus : —
[Here follow four verses of the words. The first
* His father, Henry Carey, died in 1743 !
t 1 possess a copy of this volume, which, like the " Thesaurus Musicus," previously
described, is printed from plates engraved at various periods ; there is no
composer's name attached to " God save Great George our King."
( 47 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
three resemble those at present in use ; the fourth
reads thus] : —
Long grant that Marshal Wade *
May, by Thy mighty aid,
Victory bring ;
May he sedition hush,
And like a torrent rush,
Rebellious Scots to crush,
God save the King.
Every one who has read the history of the Scotch rebellion
in 1745 will remember that Marshal Wade was a commander
of great and eminent ability, employed by our Government to
repel the factious spirit of the Caledonians, who were hostile
to this country at that time, and invaded many of the
northern parts of this island.
The following letter of the ingenious Dr. Harington, of
Bath, strongly corroborates the authenticity of my father's
being the author of the song in question. Hearing that he
was in possession of this piece of information, I entreated
him to make it known to me, which he politely and readily
acquiesced in, saying : —
"SiR, — The anecdote you mention, respecting your father
being the author and composer of the words and melody of
' God save great George our King ' is certainly true ; that
most respectable gentleman, Mr. Smith, my worthy friend
and patient, has often told me what follows, viz., 'That your
father came to him with the words and music, desiring him to
correct the bass, which Mr. Smith told him was not proper ;
and at your father's request he wrote down another in correct
harmony.' Mr. Smith, to whom I read your letter this day,
the 1 3th of June, repeated the same again. His advanced
age and present infirmity render him incapable of writing,
or desiring him to be written to ; but on his authority I
pledge myself for the truth. Should this information be in
the least advantageous to yourself, it will afford the most
sincere satisfaction and pleasure to
" Sir,
" Your most obedient servant,
Bath, June 13, 1795. W. HARINGTON.
* George Saville Carey did not notice how absurd it was to claim these words
for his father, who was dead when the Scottish Rebellion broke out, and Wade
sent to Scotland.
( 48 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
" P.S. — My curiosity was often raised to enquire after the
author before Mr. Smith related the above, and I was often
misinformed. Mr. Smith says he understood your father
intended this air as part of a birth-day ode, or somewhat of
that kind ; however this might be, no Laureate nor com-
poser has furnished the world with any production more
complimentary or more popular, which must be the con-
sequence of concise elegance and natural simplicity."
Surely the foregoing letter wears the complexion of truth,
and yet, either from envy or rigid scepticism, it has been held
out by many as a matter of doubt, without one feasible
authority of circumstantial argument that could render it so.
Convinced of the infallibility of Dr. Harington's letter, I
concluded on giving it a place here, referring the reader
to the material and provident aid the song had often yielded
to the King and State in every critical situation ; when
lurking sedition had caused loud and dangerous murmurs to
be daily heard in every house and street, threatening defiance
to the sword of justice and her wise established laws, spurning
at Majesty on his road to meet his mob-insulted senate, or
annoying him in his public pleasures, yet has the wavering
subject been often called back to his original duty to his King,
and the harsh and clamorous voice of anarchy lulled into a
calm, by this divine, this popular, and national hymn.
Reflecting on its utility, and convinced of its having been
written by my father, I thought there could be no harm in
endeavouring, through some medium or other, to make myself
known at Windsor as son of the author of " God save great
George our King," and as great families create great wants,
it is natural to wish for some little relief; accordingly I was
advised to beg the interference of a gentleman residing in the
purlieus of the castle, and who is for ever seen bowing and
scraping in the King's walks, that he would be kind enough
to explain this matter rightly to the Sovereign, thinking it
was not improbable but that some consideration might have
taken place, and some little compliment bestowed on the
offspring of one " who had done the State some service " ;
but alas ! no sooner did I move the business with the greatest
humility to the dtmi-canon, but he opened his copious mouth
as wide as a four-and-twenty-pounder, bursting as loudly upon
( 49 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
me as the largest piece of ordnance, with his chin cocked up
like the little centre figure, with his cauliflower wig, in
Bunbury's country club, exclaiming : " Sir, I do not see,
because your father wrote the song of God save the King,
that the King is under any obligation to his son." I could
have said, had he not been in his own house, that private as
well as public obligations were hereditary, and ought never
to be forgotten ; and, where there is a propinquity of blood,
it should not be suffered to rest lingering in the veins for want
of that physical assistance, gratitude. Surely no one will say
there is anything un-Christianlike in this mode of arguing ; I
am convinced there is justice in it, and there is much justice
in religion : they are engrafted and grow from the same
stock.
This is all George Saville Carey could say con-
cerning the assumption that his father, Henry Carey,
had composed " God save the King." The attempts
of Carey the younger to obtain a pension failed,
and he seems to have accepted the situation with
tolerable equanimity. Had other and more weighty
evidence been obtainable he doubtless would have
brought it into notice. He adds to the foregoing
statement : —
I am convinced, had my plea been fairly stated at a great and
good man's house, I should have had a Princely answer ; but
his doors perhaps, like Jaffer's, might have been " damm'd up,"
not with " starving creditors," but clamorous petitioners,
backed with such irresistible influence that there was nothing
to be done for me.
It is only fair here to refer to a statement, which
has obtained considerable acceptance, that Henry
Carey sang " God save the King " in 1740 at a tavern
in Cornhill, at a dinner given to celebrate the victory
of Admiral Vernon at Portobello. The evidence
adduced to support this assertion is not very direct
( 50 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
or precise. A letter addressed to the Gentlemen's
Magazine in 1796 contains the following passage :
" The first time I ever heard the anthem of ' God save
the King ' was about the year 1740, on some public
occasion at a tavern in Cornhill." Mr. Townsend,
in 1794, told Mr. John Ashley, of Bath, that his father
dined with Henry Carey at a tavern in Cornhill, in
the year 1740, at a meeting convened to celebrate
Admiral Vernon's capture of Portobello, and that
" Carey sang it on that occasion." " The applause
he received was very great, especially when he an-
nounced it to be his own composition " (Ashley's
letter to the Rev. W. L. Bowles, 1828). This third-
hand evidence is surely of small value. It is possible
that the memory of these gentlemen may have played
them false, and that they heard Carey sing some
patriotic song resembling " God save the King."
There are three songs of Carey's which might have
done duty at the tavern in Cornhill. One of them,
the composition mentioned by G. S. Carey in "The
Balnea," is to the following words: —
He comes, he comes, the Hero comes,
Sound, sound your trumpets, beat your drums.
From Port to Port let cannons roar
His welcome to the British Shear.
Welcome to the British Shoar.
Prepare, prepare, your songs prepare,
Loud, loudly rend the Ecchoing Air ;
From pole to pole your joys resound,
For Virtue is with glory crown'd.
Virtue, Virtue, Virtue, Virtue,
Virtue is with glory crown'd.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
The second, published in 1731, in The Musical
Miscellany, ends with the following verse : —
Learn, learn, ye Britons, to unite :
Leave off the old exploded Bite ;
Henceforth let Whig and Tory cease,
And turn all party rage to Peace ;
Then shall we see a glorious Scene,
And so, God save the King and Queen !
The third song is to be found in a small stage
piece of Carey's which he calls " Nancy, or The
Parting Lovers: an Interlude set to music by the
author : "—
AIR. — Death or Victory, now must determinate
All disputes with Haughty Spain ;
That proud race we'll entirely exterminate,
Or be Masters of the Main.
CHORUS. — Britons, rouse up your great magnanimity:
Let your courage now be shewn !
Till proud Spain shall, with Pusilanimity,
For its insults past atone.
If Carey really had been the author and com-
poser of " God save the King," how was it that
he never included it in any of his numerous
publications ? And if " God save the King " had
been sung at the convivial meeting in Cornhill,
in 1740, with so much applause, would it not have
been published by one of the many music-sellers
who at the time were ever ready to appropriate
and publish the effusions of composers of merit or
note with, or without, permission. (See Appendix,
p. 121.)
A writer on the subject in Long Ago, February,
1874, accounts for the non-publication of " God
( 52 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
save the King " by hazarding the supposition that
Carey's last printed composition appeared in 1740,
and that "God save the King" was probably
written immediately afterward ; but this is clearly
an error, for I have now lying before me a printed
song of Henry Carey's, composed and written to
celebrate the "late glorious victory at Dettingen."
The date of this victory was June 16, 1743,
therefore Carey's music must have been published
only just before his death, which took place
on October 5 of the same year. Again, I find the
following advertisement in the Daily Advertiser,
December 20, 1743 : —
Whereas the late Mr. Henry Carey published proposals,
dated September 20, 1743, for the reprinting of his Dramatic
works in Quarto, bound in calves leather, at half a guinea ;
this is to give notice, that the said books are reprinted, and
ready to be deliver'd to the subscribers. The widow of the
late Mr. Carey humbly begs the favour of those gentlemen
and ladies who are subscribers, to send a letter or messenger
to her house in Cross Street, Hatton Garden, where they
shall be deliver'd, she being unacquainted where to send,
otherwise would wait on them with the said books, and like-
wise those gentlemen and ladies who have subscribed to his
" Musical Century " may be supplied therewith at the same
place.
From the latter part of this advertisement we
may infer that the third edition of the " Musical
Century " had just been issued from the press, and
it is significant that " God save the King " is not
to be found in that volume.* Mr. John Christopher
Smith's correction of Carey's music may have had
* The first edition of the " Musical Century " was published in 1737, the
second in 1740.
( 53 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
reference to the " God save the King and Queen "
quoted on page 52.
Dr. Rimbault's opinion may here be cited from
Notes and Queries, of April 29, 1876 : —
The authorship of the words of our National Anthem is
all matter of conjecture. Carey is totally out of the question,
for he died in 1743, and all the stories that are told about
his singing them are entirely devoid of credit. As regards
his having composed the music, and getting Smith (Handel's
amanuensis) to adapt or alter his bass, it is too ridiculous for
serious consideration. The supporters of this theory are
men who know nothing of music, and who are unable to
judge of Carey's skill as a musician. It only requires an
examination of his works to be convinced that he possessed
considerable knowledge of the science. I may particularly
notice his Cantatas published in 1724. As music, these
compositions are second to none of the works of the minor
composers of the time. All the improbable stories told of Henry
Carey in connexion with the National Anthem were got up
regardless of truth, mainly to serve poor George Saville Carey,
and perhaps get him a pension ; but they signally failed, as
it was just they should.
Dr. Chrysander, in his Jahrbucher (Leipzig)
for 1863, page 397, gives a paragraph in italics, as
if quoted from the General Advertiser, September 28,
1745 : An demselben 28 September liess Lacy zum
erstenmal in seinem Theater Carey's God save the King
singen. (On the same 28 September, Lacy had
Carey's " God save the King " sung for the first
time in his theatre.) This is calculated to mislead.
It is true, as we have seen by the extract from the
Daily Advertiser, September 30, 1745, quoted on
page 32, that " God save the King " was first per-
formed at the theatre on September 28, but Carey's
name never appears in connection with it in the
( 54 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
General Advertiser, or any other paper of the period.
Indeed, his name was not associated with it
before George Saville Carey made an attempt to
obtain a pension, in 1795.
It may be well now to read Dr. Burney's criticism
as it appeared in the Monthly Review, July, 1799 : —
In the article " Weymouth," abounding with vulgar jokes
and flippancy, his Majesty is charged with ingratitude for not
settling an annuity of two hundred pounds on the author in
consequence of his father having written " God save great
George our King."
Here follows a quotation from " The Balnea,"
which has already been given (page 46). Dr.
Burney continues : —
The late Mr. Smith, Handel's confidential friend and
assistant, may have composed basses to some of Henry Carey's
melodies, as the latter never was thought to be what musicians
call a good contrapuntist, but as the late Mr. Smith's advanced
age and infirmities rendered him incapable of writing, or desiring
to be written to, when the question was asked him by the
respectable Dr. Harrington, his memory probably failed him.
We believe that it is wholly uncertain who was the original
author either of the words or tune of the loyal and national
song or hymn of " God save the King," and we are well assured
that it was unknown at the time of the rebellion, when it was
brought on the stage and sung at both theatres. As to Mr.
Carey's claims on behalf of his father, they can, unfortunately
for him, be easily set aside. He asserts, from the authority of
counsellor Galliard, " that it was produced in forty-five and
six," but alas ! Sir John Hawkins informs me that the facetious
H. Carey, in a fit of insanity or despondency at the badness of
his circumstances, put an end to his own existence about the
year 1744, and this account has been copied in the octavo edition
of the Bibliographia Britannica of 1784. Though there is little
room for dependance on the dates of Sir John, the Bibliographia
Dramatica, much better authority, and the Gentleman's
Magazine, fix his death on the fourth of October, 1743.
( 55 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
In a later number of the Monthly Review (April,
1800), Burney, in reviewing Coxe's "Anecdotes of
George Frederick Handel and John Christopher
Smith," says : —
We find a note at page 43 of this pamphlet on the mention
of Harry Carey which we cannot pass over. We are sorry to
see in this note an unqualified assertion repeated, that Carey
was the author of the words and music of the now national
song or hymn of " God save great George our King " which we
fully refuted in our Review for July, 1799, page 356. As all
the magazines and newspapers of the time tell us that Carey
died in 1743, the song could not have been written and set to
music by him for the rebellion of 1745 ! Nor on any antecedent
occasion, since it does not appear in any of Carey's numerous
publications of songs with and without music ; and, had it been
his, it could not have remained concealed so many years. The
composer of the words and melody was utterly unknown at the
time of the rebellion, when it was in such favour, and so much
inquiry was made after the author. We mean not by denying
poor Carey this honour, to depreciate his talents ; which were
original both in the words and music of a great number of
beautiful ballads, serious and comic ; but his claim to the air
in question is so ill-founded that nothing but the infirmity of
Mr. Smith's memory at his great age* and when on the brink
of the grave, can account for his abetting it.
On Thursday, November 17, 1743, a perform-
ance was given at Covent Garden Theatre, for the
benefit of the widow and family of Henry Carey.
The advertisement announcing it is curious as
* He was then 83 years of age. Carey had at various times published songs
containing the following : —
" King George he was born in the month of October
Tis a sin for a subject that month to be sober."
" God send no end to line Divine
Of George and Caroline."
" Then we shall a glorious scene
And so, God save the King and Queen."
It is quite possible Smith may have seen some of these.
( 56 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
containing the only instance I have seen of Carey's
name appearing without an " e," evidently a mis-
print ; his name is always spelt Carey on his own
numerous publications, and on the roll of the " Royal
Society of Musicians," of which he was a member : —
For the benefit of the Wido-.v and four small children of the
late Mr. Henry Gary. At the Theatre Royal in Covent Garden
on Thursday next, the iyth inst., will be presented a Comedy,
call'd The Miser. The part of Lappit to be perform'd by Mrs.
Clive, in which character will be introduced a song call'd " The
life of a Bean." To which will be added a Farce call'd The
Virgin Unmask' d. The part of Miss Lucy by Mrs. Clive.
With other entertainments as will be express'd in the bills.
Boxes 53. Pit 35. Gallery as. Tickets and places to be had
of Mr. Page at the Stage door of the Theatre, or at Mr. Suett's,
the Apple Tree in Cold-Bath Fields ; or at the Widow Gary's
in Cross Street, Hatton Garden.
In the Daily Advertiser, December i, 1743, we find
the following, which may be regarded as a summary
of the notable doings of Carey, but there is no
reference to any National Song or Anthem : —
Prologue (spoke by Mr. Hale) to The Miser ;
Acted at the Theatre Royal in Covent Garden, for the benefit
of the Widow of the late Mr. Henry Carey, and her four small
children.
By Mr. Lockman.
Deep in the Fane, where Monarchs breathless lie,
Pleas'd we the Busts, to Poets would descry ;
Asa just Tribute offer'd to their Name :
And rousing some to vie with them in Fame.
Yet idle all such Trophies must appear,
Compar'd to what now forms the Circle here :
Those are but Honours to a Phantom paid ;
By you the Helpless will be Happy made.
And sure no contrast is more strong or just,
Than that 'twixt succouring Life and honouring Dust,
( 57 ;
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Ye generous Souls, whose sympathising Breast
Shares every Pang that tortures the distress'd,
Say, mid the various Joys you taste below,
What Bliss so great as easing virtuous Woe ?
O ! say what Charm, the Widow's Tear to dry,
To echo fondly to the Orphan's sigh ? —
To be their Guardian, bid their Wailings ctase
And, with kind Language, tune their Souls to Peace ?
Frequent the Bard, whose Reliques are your Care,
In Theatres has pleas'd the Brave and Fair ;
His double Muse diverts us from the Stage,
Whilst Nature, Humour, ev'ry Ear engage :
She soothes in private, whilst the Fair-One sings
Gaily responsive to th' harmonious Strings.
Ah ! should his breathing Offspring then be left
Weeping, defenceless, of all Aid bereft ?
Be sunk in Sorrow, when their Father's Lyre
With Cheerfulness does every Heart inspire ?
Vain is the Recompense of only Fame :
Who serve the Public, thence Support may claim.
Yet this Reflection cannot here have Place,
Vanish'd the Bard and clos'd his mortal Race ;
From his blithe Fancy you no more expect,
And 'tis from Goodness only you protect.
Exalted Goodness ! which whilst it supplies
Another's Wants, bids countless Transports rise ;
Transports that bless the Donor ; dart a Joy
Which naught can lessen, nor even Death destroy.
Raptures like thes.e (bright Charity's alone,
Child of the Skies; to Avarice are unknown.
Av'rice to all Things, but mean Interest blind,
Can boast no kindred ; outcast of Mankind.
Fruitless, mid you, our comic Muse wou'd place
Her sportive Glass, in hopes to catch a Face.
She comes not to instruct, but to delight,
So only holds your Counterpart in Sight ;
A Miser ! Weeds like this curse every Soil
Beauty is best distinguished by her Foil.
A letter of Lord Houghton's, published in The Times,
( 58 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
February i, 1878, concluded with the following bold
assertion : — " The French might find some consola-
tion in the knowledge that ' God save the King ' was
composed by Lully, and first produced on the visit of
Louis XIV. and Madame de Maintenon to the convent
of the Demoiselles de St.-Cyr. Some years after, it
was happily and unscrupulously appropriated by
Dr. Bull, organist of St. Paul's."
Lully was born in 1633, five years after the death
of Dr. Bull, who, by the way, was never organist of
St. Paul's ; therefore the stigma of " unscrupulous
appropriation " should rest on the head of Lully, were
there any foundation for the mythical performance
before Louis and Madame de Maintenon. The
whole story, however, rests on the mendacious
fabrication entitled " Souvenirs de la Marquise de
Crequi, 1710 a 1800," Paris, 1834. Soon after the
appearance of this work the volumes were noticed in
the Quarterly Review. The reviewer most con-
clusively proves the worthlessness and absurdity of
the clumsy forgery, which is believed to have been
the work of Cousen de St. Malo. A sentence or
two from the Quarterly Review must suffice here,
the whole article is printed in the Appendix
(p. in):—
Infinite are the shapes of falsehood, and depuis feu Protee,
as Madame de Deffand pleasantly says, nothing can equal the
versatility of a Parisian manufacturer of memoirs. . . . We
are confident, and shall prove, that the " Memoires" are, in
every point of view, a complete forgery — the grossest and most
impudent of impostures ; for not only are the facts false, and
the work spurious, but the very person to whom they are
attributed is a phantom created by the ignorance of the
( 59 ) E
GOD SAVE THE KING.
fabricator, who, having very ridiculously mistaken one lady of
the family of Crequi for another, builds his whole edifice on this
fundamental blunder. . . . We add, that the literary merit of
the work is worse than nothing — vulgar trash — stupid thread-
bare stories, not only common to all French jest-books, but to
be found in our own Joe Miller — indecent in many passages,
disgusting in more, contemptible in all.
The article from which the above passages have
been extracted appeared in June, 1834, and in the
following August the story of " God save the King "
and the nuns of St.-Cyr was innocently paraded in
The Times as a marvellous discovery, but was very
speedily demolished. The Parisians, not content
with the " Souvenirs de la Marquise de Crequi,"
manufactured the following canard, which appeared
in the Cabinet de Lecture : —
They write from Edinburgh that the MS. Memoirs of the
Duchess of Perth have been sold in London for £3,000 ; among
them are to be found a number of interesting details relative to
the Court of Louis XIV., as well as of James II., during the
sojourn of the King and Queen of England at St.-Germain-en-
Laye. In giving an account of the establishment at St.-Cyr,
she bears testimony not quite unknown in France, but which
hitherto rested on that of the ancient nuns of this house,
namely, that the air and words of " God save the King " are of
French origin. She says, when the most Christian King
entered the Chapel, all the Choir of the aforesaid noble damsels
sung each time the following words to a very fine air by Sieur
de Lully :—
GRAND DIEU, sauvez le Roy !
Grand Dieu, vengez le Roy !
Vive le Roy !
Que toujours glorieux,
Louis victorieux,
Voye ses ennemis,
Toujours soumis,
Grand Dieu, sauvez le Roy!
Vive le Roy.
( 60 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
The tradition (proceeds the Duchess) at St.-Cyr is that the
composer Handel, during his visit to the Superior of the House,
obtained leave to copy the air and words, which he submitted
to George I. as his own composition. Madame de Crequi, in
her " Recollections," relates the anecdote in the same manner,
and adds that the words were written by Madame Briandon.
Immediately after the publication of the foregoing
fabrication certain questions were published, and to
this day they remain unanswered, for very evident
reasons. Where are the memoirs of the Duchess of
Perth ? Who sold them, and who bought them ?
Lully died in 1687, a year before the fictitious
singing by the " noble damsels" ; and as to Handel,
the story is so absurd that it is almost a waste of
time to consider the imputation that he stole the
air. He was the most eminent composer in London
when " God save the King " was produced at the
theatres ; his friend and amanuensis being the John
Christopher Smith who fancied that " God save the
King " was the work of Henry Carey. There is
abundant evidence in print that Handel gave
frequent proof of his loyalty to the royal family by
the exercise of his genius. We find in the Daily
Advertiser, November 28, 1743 : —
Yesterday his Majesty was at the Chapel Royal, St. James's,
and heard a sermon by the Rev. Dr. Thomas, when the new
Te Deum and the following Anthem, both set by Mr. Handel
on his Majesty's safe arrival, were perform'd before the royal
family, " The King shall rejoice in thy strength, O Lord," &c.
Again, in the Daily Advertiser, September 12, 1744
we read : —
At the Green House at Windsor, this day, a grand concert,
to conclude with the Coronation Anthem of " God save the
King."
( 6l ) E 2
GOD SAVE THE KING.
This doubtless meant the grand anthem composed
by Handel for the Coronation of George II., in 1727 :
" Zadock the priest and Nathan the prophet anointed
Solomon King, and all the people rejoiced and said,
God save the King, long live the King, may the King
live for ever ! Amen. Alleluja."
In the General Advertiser, October 26, 1745 : —
At the late Wells, the bottom of Lemon Street, Goodman's
Fields, on Monday next, will be performed a Concert of Vocal
and Instrumental Musick. Divided into two parts. The
Concert to conclude with the Chorus of Long live the King.
There is a song of Handel's, said to have been
sung about that time ; each verse ends with " Long
live the King." The first verse reads as follows :—
Stand round, my brave boys, with heart and with voice
And all in full chorus agree ;
We'll fight for our King, and as loyally sing,
And let the world know we'll be free.
CHORUS — The rebels shall fly, as with shouts we draw nigh
And Echo shall victory ring ;
Then safe from alarms, we'll rest on our arms,
And chorus it, Long live the King.
Later on we find Handel composing a national
song with the express intention of catching the
popular ear. In the General Advertiser, November
14, 1745, is an advertisement of the performance at
Drury Lane Theatre of "A Chorus Song, set by
Mr. Handel for the Gentlemen Volunteers of the
City of London, to be sung by Mr. Lowe and others."
I could easily enlarge upon Handel's loyal work, but
it is not necessary here.
( 62 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
There have been many staunch champions on
behalf of a claim that the tune of " God save the
King" had a Scottish origin. Dr. Mackay, in the
London Scottish Journal, August n, 1877, has ex-
pressed his " conviction that the composition was
written to give expression to the loyalty of the
Jacobites, and their hopes for the restoration of
James VIII. of Scotland, the father of Prince Charles
Edward." The latest advocacy of these views
appeared in The Times of February 27, 1878, as
follows : —
GOD SAVE THE KING.
TO THE EDITOR OF " THE TIMES."
SIR, — Like everything that is excellent, the air and original
verses of " God save the King " are both Scotch.
In an account of the Highland Society of London, drawn up
at the desire of the society by Sir John Sinclair, of Ulbster, and
published in 1813, his Royal Highness the Duke of Sussex
being then President of the Society, I find the following : —
" Some account of the celebrated air of ' God save the King '
and copy of the original verses to which it was sung.
" It cannot now be decisively ascertained who was the com-
poser of this celebrated air, or whether it was of Scotch or
English or German extraction. It seems indeed to have been
a compilation, for a part of the air is to be found in a collection
of Scotch music published at Aberdeen in the reign of William
and Mary ; but, to whomsoever the air may be attributed, there
is every reason to believe that the original words to which that
air was sung were Scotch, and composed in favour of the House
of Stuart. Indeed the author of this account (Sir John
Sinclair) had an opportunity of copying the following verses,
supposed to be the original ones, from an inscription cut in
glass on an old drinking-cup still preserved at Fingask Castle,
in the Carse of Gowrie, North Britain, the seat of P. Murray
( 63 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Threipland, Esq., whose family were distinguished by their
attachment to the House of Stuart : —
" God save the King. I pray
" God bless the King. I pray
" God save the King.
"Send him victorious,*
" Happy, and glorious,
" Soon to reign over us,
" God save the King;
" God bless the Prince of Wales,
" The true-born Prince of Wales.f
" Sent us by Thee.
" Grant us one favour more,
" The King for to restore,
" As Thou hast done before.
" The Familie.
" Amen."
It would be interesting to get hold of a copy of the collection
of Scotch music published at Aberdeen in the reign of William
and Mary, in which a part of the air is to be found. Also, if
possible, to learn the date when these lines were inscribed-on
the old drinking-cup, which were copied previous to 1813 by
Sir John Sinclair.
I am, Sir, your obedient servant,
February 25 [1878]. D. FORREST.
This account of the drinking-glass appeared, word
for word, in Richard Clark's book (1822), page 37,
and was there given as an extract from The Gentle-
man's Magazine. But, of course, inscriptions on
drinking-glasses are valueless unless we can posi-
tively affix a date to them. The drinking-glass may
* " Send him victorious " is retained in the modern version, and is evidently
more applicable to the Stuart than to the Hanoverian family.
t " From this line it would appear that these verses must have been written
either about the time of, or rather before the Rebellion in 1715."
( 64 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
be old, but the inscription may be modern. The
recent traveller who found the lines " Try Warren's
Blacking " on the Great Pyramid did not imme-
diately come to the conclusion that it was a
contemporaneous work of the Pharaohs.
When we consider the music published at
Aberdeen we deal with something tangible. There
is a book entitled " Cantus, Songs and Fancies to
three, four, or Jive parts ; both apt for Voices and
Viols. With a brief Introduction to Mustek, as it is
taught* in the Musick School of Aberdeen. Printed in
Aberdeen by John Forbes."* Three editions of the
book were published in 1662, 1666, and 1682.
Although printed in Scotland, it by no means
follows that its contents are Scottish ; indeed, the
author (Forbe^) says in his preface that the book
contains " a considerable number of excellent choise
Italian songs and English ayres." A superficial
glance at the volume shows us that it includes such
well-known pieces as Douland's " /fvvake, sweet
love," and Morley's "Now is the month of maying."
The music referred to as resembling " God save
the King " is set to the words, " Remember, O thou
man, thy time is spent," &c. ; but it had previously
appeared in a book published in London in 1611
under the following title : " Melismata : Musicall
Phansies fitting the Court, Citie, and Countrey
Humours. To 3, 4, and 5 Voyces. London :
Printed by William Stansby for Thomas Adams."
* Professor Wooldridge, in his preface to " Old English Popular Music," 1893,
says " of this work nothing but the Cantus part remains." No other part was ever
printed. Cantus is the title of the book, which is complete, and includes parts
for more than one voice.
( 65 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
A CHRISTMAS CARROLL.
— r— i-
Re-mem-ber, O thouman, O thouman, O thouman, Re-mem-ber,
1 — r
1-
O thou man, thy time is spent. Re - mem - ber, O thou man,
how thou was dead and gone, and I did what I can : there-fore re - pent.
[The small notes with the tails turned down are according to the " Melismata '
copy, the other reading is that found in the Aberdeen " Cantus."]
" Melismata," in which " Remember, O thou man "
was printed, was edited by Thomas Ravenscroft,
and became very widely known amongst musicians.
It is, however, probable that the Christmas Carol
was a very old tune, and that Ravenscroft merely
harmonised it in four parts. Be that as it may,
Dr. Bull, at the time of the publication of
" Melismata " (1611), was in the zenith of his fame,
and surely had he desired to make variations to a
well-known carol, such as " Remember, O thou
man," he would have given the tune in its original
form.
The air of " God save the King " has sometimes
been claimed for Henry Purcell. " The Essex
Harmony " (third edition, 1786) prints it with his
name attached, but there is no composer's name
in the previous editions of the work. Richard
Clark asserted that Purcell was acquainted with
( 66 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
" God save the King," and endeavoured to prove
it by quoting a passage from the Sonatas published
by Purcell in 1683. Clarke was not, however,
content to leave his readers to judge fairly of the
extent of the resemblance, but positively altered
the notation and added bars of music and words,
the original being a composition without words for
viols (two violins and a bass) with " harpsecord."
LARGO FROM PURCELL'S SIXTH SONATA.
I* :
M
ZEE*
— '
i
There are twenty-six bars more in a similar strain.
Clark printed one other example from Purcell, and it
is to be found on page 4 of " A choice Collection of
Lessons for the Harpsichord or Spinnet, composed
( 67 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
by the late Mr. Henry Purcell " ; published by his
widow, Frances Purcell, in 1696 :—
-f — * — *-
i
•^p
^a
I ---
It will be seen that the air from Ravenscroft's
" Melismata," and the extracts from Purcell's instru-
mental compositions have certain resemblances to
" God save the King," notably the triple rhythm and
two-bar phrases ; but they are wanting in the most
important feature which is found in Bull's Ayre, and
in the National Anthem, namely, the six-bar first
part, and the eight-bar second part.
If the reader has carefully considered the details
placed before him in these pages, he will be able to
affirm with confidence that Carey had nothing
whatever to do with the composition of either the
words or the music of " God save the King." He
will be equally ready to reject the mythical French
( 68 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
origin ; the suggested Scottish derivation, and the
ridiculous Handel claim * ; probably he will adopt the
opinion that the music is, as I think, derived from
the air by Dr. John Bull, and that the original Latin
words were used in the Catholic Church service. Of
course, in the lapse of years, Bull's tune has been
altered and improved by the " Vox Populi," an
inevitable and desirable process in the formation of
a national melody.
It would be worth while, at the opening of this
new century, and at the commencement of what we
pray may be a long and glorious reign, to revert to
the form of words used in 1745-6 :—
God save our Lord the King,
Long live our noble King,
God save the King.
Send him victorious,
Happy and glorious,
Long to reign over us,
God save the King.
O Lord our God arise,
Scatter his enemies,
And make them fall.
Confound their Politicks,
Frustrate their knavish tricks,
On him our hopes are fixed,
God save us all.
Thy choicest gifts in store,
On him be pleased to pour,
Long may he reign.
May he defend our laws,
And ever give us cause,
With heart and voice to sing
God save the King.
* The fictitious stories associated with the names of Anthony Young and
Jamee Oswald are dealt with on pages 101-3,
( 69 )
APPENDIX.
APPENDIX.
GOD SAVE THE KINGE.
(See p. 10.) Dr. JOHN BULL, 1616.
From the original manuscript in the Library of Wm. Kitchener, M.D.*
•f" <fl,o Jtfm m , S"V-)
:i=u r £J~T^*\» ^-g^-jj j
L_uJ I U"
m
William Kitchener, born in London about 1775, and died in 1827.
( 73 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
1
* The notes D and F, are both marked b in Kitchener's print; manifest errors.
( 74 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
m
i F
( 75 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
m
Pi
GOD SAVE THE KING.
! L
— .
B.
.
( 77 )
F 2
GOD SAVE THE KING.
-*- -r
yyy^vv^*
*M=-
^Ff^
•j!Lasgg=
?"^~f'
I I
* t> Omitted, t The Bass E is i> in Kitchener's print.
( 78 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
V r
— fc
I i r-
I
itl — ^ r^"*^^ — i^ — jiu^cr
I
^~ f\ * r f\ 'J~
tf^TTTf-^^^
g
( 79 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
1 — •_L —
===
- JT— i* ~y .•— ^=?\ y ?
GOD SAVE THE KING.
m
iJ^N^'
GOD SAVE THE KING.
P
i
T=f=F
:prz=i
JUS
s^EEi
r* J. js
^EE^^S
-^— r=r
IH£
-i — f-j^g— «—
r-
I u-
I &
r
I
;r
=S=C=
The <r are marked = in Kitchener's printed copy.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
"Copied from Dr. Bull's MS. Book, about which so much has been written,
now in the possession of R. Clark— (G. Smart). — Page 98."
^
i r
/a. -^ ^. 4^
GOD SAVE THE KING.
=p I E
f - -f- f5-
J^d-J J . J
2 more verses
The first printed copy of God save our Lord the
King, page 22, of "Thesaurus Musicus." First
edition. 1740. (?)
(For Two Voices.)
.y ft ;t — i -i h
1 — T r~
~i — f* J r
&y=J=J=i=
-J— J ' I
*— r— g^=
SjEEaEili
v ' .•
God save our Lord the King, Long live our
no - ble King,
-r— ?=
H
i — i — i — j_
-I ^ 1 \-
God save the King! Send him vie - to - ri - ous, Hap-py and
~J- «TPH— II f— f" f Lu—S-r-l-f— F=£=
GOD SAVE THE KING.
g
Glo - ri - ous, Long to reign o - ver us, God save the King !
O Lord our God arise,
Scatter his Enemies,
And make them fall :
Confound their Politicks,
Frustrate their Knavish Tricks.
On him our Hopes are fix'd,
O save us all.
£,
A LOYAL SONG.
Sung at the Theatres Royal.
For Two Voices.
(Second Edition of " Thesaurus Musicus." 1745. )
J-
God save great George our King, Long live our no - ble King,
L_J
JpS
g r
"I*' F m \ f * *=
-i — u ru i i
God save the King! Send him vie - to - ri-ous, Hap - py and
n — P * ^ — i — f^ * — m — i — <• (•-
GOD SAVE THE KING.
~p- m-
glo - ri - ous, Long to reign o - ver us, God save the King!
J=JUILI-J- Jl ±-
s
O Lord our God arise,
Scatter his enemies.
And make them fall ;
Confound their Politicks,
Frustrate their Knavish Tricks,
On thee our hopes we fix,
God save us all.
Thy choicest gifts in store,
On George be pleas'd to pour,
Long may he reign.
May he defend our laws,
And ever give us cause,
With Heart and Voice to sing,
God save the King.
DR. ARNE'S ARRANGEMENT OF THE NATIONAL
ANTHEM, FROM HIS AUTOGRAPH MANUSCRIPT IN
THE BRITISH MUSEUM.* (Add. MSS. 29,466.)
^
God bless our no • ble King, God save great George onr King, God save the King
I
* This arrangement made by Dr. Arne, was performed in Drury Lane Theatre,
on Saturday evening, September 28, 1745. The principal singers were,
Mrs. Cibber, Messrs. Beard and Reinhold. The pianoforte accompaniment is
added here for convenience.— (W. H. C.)
( 85 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Vio. imo & 2do.
• . P -q g; g-r^t - * =?- T-?S— »— gr-rS-g-r— — gJ-r-fi? J^\- » \ g=-^T
fe
CHORUS.
gfrfe 1-
M
i_-k_^ _
^JL-rt)- *
bb
i I I
-f> b g^ 'a; (P i-J g! i-g-e-^-i-:
=!... PJ
,-j . <s :&.__,« £2.
E^:
Send him vie - to - ri - ous, Hap - py and glo - ri - ous,
GOD SAVE THE KING.
— ,S,_ ,—C-c
*=^^*=?*
i * — t
Long to reign o - ver us, God save the King !
P1 ^5-
m
E£fc
^. - -: - -- -. . ._ _--i__
i r
GOD SAVE THE KING.
1 J -J.
M
m
m
k
r
p
J
GOD SAVE THE KING.
THE BANQUET GIVEN BY THE COMPANY OF MERCHANT TAYLORS
TO JAMES I. IN 1607.
For 19 Ibs. of rope at 3d. the pound,
and 31 Ibs. of rope at 3d.
More for three pullies for to hoise up
the shippe 6d. the peece
13?. 6d.
To Mr. Springham for 19 ells £ of taffite
to make clothes for the three singers
in the shipp, and fcr him that made
the speech to His Maty at 135. 4d.
the ell, the some of
To John Allen the chief singer in the)
shipp j
To Thomas Lupo the chief singer in the )
shipp being his Maty Musitian J
To John Richards the third singer in )
the shipp )
To John Hemmyngs for his direccion
of his boy that made the speech to
his Maty 405., and 5$. given to John
Rise the speaker
To John, Mr. Swynnerton's man, for
things for the boy that maOe the
spetch
Viz : For garters, stockings, shooes,
ribons and gloves
For making of the two robes 6s. 8d. for
the ribons and tapes 2s. 6d. and for
the firing 8s. 8d.
For buckroms for the babes J8d. for
flowers for the garlands 35. 6d.
For sowing silke 2s. 4d. for making of
ye garments 255.
For setting of the songs that were
songe to his Maty to Mr. Copiarario
To Mr. Johnson's man for writing out
copies of the speech and songew to
be giuen to the King and Lords with
others
To Mr. Johnson for the Musitian's
dynner the day before the feast
( 89 )
•13
For the Ship
For taffita for ye
garmts of the
singers in the
shipp and robes
for the speaker.
- o 13
To ye Tavlrr
o 17 10
7 4
- o 15
GOD SAVE THE KING.
o To them
plaid on
o Lute
To Powle's singing men by Mr. Ben I £ s. d.
Johnson 150
47/. 8s. zd.
To Thomas Robinson 305. and to Mr.
John Done 405. 3 IO
To George Roselor 405. and to Tho.
Sturgon 405. 4 °
To Willm. Ffregosie, by Mr. Roselor
40$., and by Jo. Robson 405. 400
To Nickolas Sturt for himself and his !
sonne 400
To William Browne, by Sturt 405. and
to Joseph Sherly 405. 400
To Wilm Morley for himself 405. and \
for Robert Kenn'sly 405.
To Robt. Bateman and Stephen
Thomas who plaid on the treble
violens, by Nicholas Sturt and
Richard Morley
To Mr. Beniamyn Johnson, the poett,
for inventing the speech to his Maty
and for making the songs, and his
direccions to others in that business
that
the
For 8 horsload of birch for to make the
windowes for them that plaid on the
lute i )
To his Mats trompetors 405. : and to
his droms 205. 3 o
To the princes trompetors and droms i o
To Mr. John Bull, Doctor of Musique,
to pay to him that sett up the winde !
instruments in the King's chamber, [
where the King dined, and for tuning j
it, with the carriage of it from and to
Ruccolds 2 1 8
To Mr. Edney, Mr. Lancere,* and fewer
others of his Ma*s Musitions players
of wynde instruments being placed
over the skreene
* Laniere is intended.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
DR. JOHN BULL.
John Bull was born, probably in the parish of
Peylinch, in Somersetshire, in 1563. He became one
of the children of Queen Elizabeth's Chapel Royal
in 1572, when William Blitheman, the renowned
organist, was master of the boys who " spared
neither time nor talent to advance his natural
ability." On December 24, 1582, he was appointed
organist of Hereford Cathedral and subsequently
master of the choristers. In January, 1585, he was
admitted a " Gentleman of the Chapels Royal,"
in the place of Mr. Bodinghurst. In the following
year, on the gth of July, he took the degree of
Mus. Bac., Oxford, having " practised the faculty of
music fourteen years." In 1591 he was admitted to
the degree of Mus. Doc., Cambridge. It is said that
at the last-named date he was appointed organist of
the Chapels Royal in succession to his former
master, Blitheman. An interesting entry in the old
Cheque book of the Chapel Royal records the
appointment, May 29, 1592, of William Phelps, of
Tewkesbury, as " Gentleman extraordinary," who
" dyd show a most rare kyndness to Mr. Doctor Bull
in his great distresse, being robbed in those parts."
On July 7, 1592, Bull was admitted to the degree of
Mus. Doc., Oxford. It is said this had been delayed
in consequence of his having met with "rigid
Puritans there, who could not endure church
music." In 1596, on the opening of Gresham College,
( 91 ) G
GOD SAVE THE KING.
he was made the first music lecturer upon the
recommendation of Queen Elizabeth, who, on
November 30, 1596, addressed a letter on his behalf
to the Mayor and Aldermen of London. Bull,
being unable to deliver his lectures in Latin,
according to the founder's intentions, a special
ordinance was passed in his favour as follows :
" The solemn music-lecture twice every week,
in manner following, viz., the theoretique part for
one half hour, or thereabouts, and the practique,
by concert of voice or instruments, for the rest of
the hour, whereof the first lecture should be in the
Latin tongue, and the second in English ; but
because at this time, Mr. Dr. Bull, who is
recommended to the place by the Queen's Most
excellent Majesty, being not able to speak Latin,
his lectures are to be permitted to be altogether in
English, so long as he shall continue in the place of
music-lecturer there."
His inaugural address was delivered on October 6,
1597. It was printed by Thomas East (see Register
of the Stationers' Co.), but no copy can now be
found.
In 1601, Bull, being out of health, was permitted
to travel abroad and to nominate Thomas Byrd as
his deputy during his absence ; he journeyed
incognito, and visited Germany and France.
Antony a Wood narrates the following amusing
story : —
Dr. Bull hearing of a famous musician belonging to a
certain cathedral at St. Omer's, he applied himself as a novice
to him, to learn something of his faculty, and to see and
( 92 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
admire his works. This musician, after some discourse had
passed between them, conducted Bull to a vestry or music-
school adjoining the Cathedral, and shewed to him a lesson or
song of forty parts, and then made a vaunting challenge to
any person in the world to add one more part to them,
supposing it to be so complete and full that it was impossible
for any mortal man, to correct or add to it ; Bull thereupon
desiring the use of pen, ink, and ruled paper, such as we
call musical paper, prayed the musician to lock him up in the
said school for two or three hours ; which being done, not
without great disdain by the musician, Bull in that time or
less, added forty more parts to the said lesson or song. The
musician being thereupon called in, he viewed it, tried it, at
length he burst out into a great ecstacy, and swore by the
great God that he that added those forty parts must either be
the Devil or Dr. Bull. Whereupon Bull making himself
known the musician fell down and adored him. Afterwards
continuing there and in those parts for a time, he became so
much admired, that he was courted to accept of any place or
preferment suitable to his profession, either within the
dominions of the Emperor, King of France, or Spain ; but
the tidings of these transactions coming to the English Court,
Queen Elizabeth commanded him home.
On December 15, 1606, Bull was admitted into
the freedom of the Merchant Taylors' Company, by
service, he having been apprenticed to Thomas, the
Right Honourable the Earl of Sussex, who was free
of the Company.
A list, dated December 31, 1606, of persons to
whom James I. ordered " Gold chains, plates or
medals to be given," includes the name of Dr. John
Bull.
On July 16, 1607, the memorable banquet was
given by the Company to King James I., when Bull
performed on the organ. On December 22, in the
same year, Bull obtained a marriage licence from the
( 93 ) 02
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Bishop of London, which is entered in the following
terms : —
Mr. John Bull, Dr. of Music, of the Strand, and Organist
of His Majesty's Chapel, Bachr., 47 or 48, and Elizabeth
Walter, of the Strand, Maiden, about 24, dau of — Walter,
Citizen of London, deed., she attending upon the Rt. Hon.
The Lady Marchioness of Winchester, at Christ Church,
London.
This marriage necessitated his resignation of the
Gresham Professorship, which could only be held by
an unmarried man. In 1611, his name stood first
in the list of the musicians of Prince Henry, with a
salary of £40 per annum.
In 1612, Bull wrote the following letter (Miscel-
laneous Collections relating to Gresham College.
British Museum. Add. MSS. 6194) :—
To his honorable and singular good frinde Sr. Michaell
Hiks these.
SR.
I have bin many times to have spoken with you, to desire
your favor to my L. and M. Chaunchelor. Sir my humble
sute is, that it would please my L. and M. Cha. to graunte me
theire favors to chainge my name in my letters patents, and to
(put) in my childes, leaving out my owne. It is but forty
pounds by yeare for my service heretofore, the mater is not
greate, yet it wilbe some reliefe for my poore childe, havinge
nothinge ells to leave it. The Kinge hath bin moved by Sir
Chri. Perkins, who hath order from the Kinge to speak with Sir
Julio Cesar. I humbly thanck Sir Julio Cesar. I have bin with
him, and hath promised me his favor ; but one worde of yours
will speade it, and make me and my poore childe everlastingly
bound to you. I humbly desire you speak in this my humble
sute with all the expidition you may, and so with my humble
duty remembered I take leave.
Yours ever to commande
Indorsed 26 Apr. J. BULL.
1612 Docter Bull.
( 94 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
We have seen that Bull could only retain his
Gresham Professorship whilst unmarried, and the
date of his marriage, December, 1607, makes it
impossible that a son born in wedlock should have
been old enough in 1612 to succeed his father as
organist and composer to His Majesty. " The
poore childe " must therefore have been an
illegitimate son, and this fact explains the
accusations brought against Bull by James I., as
will appear later.
In 1613, Bull was residing abroad as one of the
organists of the Chapel Royal in Brussels. The
Cheque book of the Chapel Royal (London), under
date 1613, contains the following notice : — " Jo. Bull,
Doctor of Musick, went beyond the seaes and served
the Archduke* at Michaelmas." Another entry
under the same date says, " John Bull, doctor of
Musicke, went beyond the seas without license and
was admitted into the Archduke's service, and
entered into paie there about Michaelmas."
It is remarkable that the records of the Chapel
Royal contain no further reference to Bull's un-
authorised and clandestine departure from London
and from his Court duties. At that time he was
probably the most famous musician in England, his
reputation having been greatly enhanced by his
professional travels on the Continent.
However, it is evident from Bull's letter dated
April 26, 1612, that he was even then contemplating
leaving England, and therefore anxious for a
< Albert, son of the Emperor ; he married a Princess of Spain, and resided at
Brussels.
( 95 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
settlement "for his poore childe." The following
extract from a letter sent to King James I. throws a
little more light on this matter. The writer of the
letter was William Trumbull, who was Ambassador
to the Archduke Albert of Austria, Regent of the
Netherlands, from 1609 till 1625 ; he returned to
England and died in London in September, 1635.
May 30, 1614 (O.S.) :—
Most Excellent and most worthy Soveraign,
Finding after long attendance by reason of the Archdukes
indisposition, that he was now so much amended as he gave
accefs to some ministers of other princes, I procured audience of
him on Monday was sennight ; and according to your Majesties
commandment sent me by Sir Thomas Lake, after I had used
some congratulations unto him in your Majesties name for the
recovery of his health, which he seemed to take in very good
part, I told him, that I had charge from your Majestie to
acquaint him, that your Majestie upon knowledge of his
receiving Dr. Bull, your Majesties organist and sworn servant
into this chappel, without your Majesties permission or consent,
or once so much as speaking thereof to me, that am resyding
here for your Majesties affairs : that your Majesty did justly find
it strange as you were his friend and ally, and had never used
the like proceedings either towards him or any forreign Prince ;
adding that the like course was not practized among private
persons, much lefs among others of greater place and dignity.
And I told him plainly, that it was notorious to all the world,
the said Bull did not leave your Majesties service for any wrong
done unto him, or for matter of religion, under which fained
pretext he now sought to wrong the reputation of your
Majesties justice, but did in that dishonest manner steal out of
England through the guilt of a corrupt conscience, to escape
the punishment, which notoriously he had deserved, and was
designed to have been inflicted on him by the hand of justice,
for his incontinence, fornication, adultery, and other greivous
crimes. (Brit. Mus., Add. MSS. 6194.)
( 96 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Remembering the history of the times of James I.,
it is amusing to read of his great anxiety to punish
a moral delinquent in the person of Bull. His
Majesty's annoyance at the loss of the services of
such an eminent musician may possibly have served
as a stimulant. It would be interesting to trace the
progress of further negotiations between King James
and the Archduke, and also what steps were taken by
Bull to mollify the wrath of his late Royal Master ;
that something was attempted seems fairly certain,
for it was in the year 1616 that Bull composed the
air with variations to which he gave the title " God
save the Kinge," and in the following year, 1617, he
was promoted to the organistship of Notre Dame
Cathedral, in Antwerp (at a salary of 100 florins per
annum), in succession to the deceased Rombout
Waelrant. In 1620 he was residing in the house
adjoining the Church, by the side of the Place Verte,
the habitation of the concierge of the Cathedral. He
died in that house on March 13, 1628, and was
buried in the Cathedral on the I5th of the same
month. During his tenure of office great improve-
ments in the Cathedral organ were made under his
personal guidance and supervision. It is interesting
to note that several English musicians were resident
in Antwerp about the time of Bull, amongst them
John Beake (a Priest Chaplain), John Stark,
Anthony Sanders, Adam Gordon, Thomas Covert,
Edmund Lewkenor, William Cledero, Robert Bruck,
and one Fitzgerald.
( 97 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
A portrait of Bull is in the Music School, Oxford,
painted on panel, with an inscription on the left
side of the head, AN. ^ETATIS SU.E 26, 1589,* and
on the right side, an hour-glass placed on a skull.
Around the four sides of the frame was inscribed
the following :—
The bull by force in field doth raigne,
But Bull by skill good will doth gayne.
The date is of importance, enabling us to fix the
year of Bull's birth. The wedding license describes
him as about 47 or 48 in 1607; one can only suppose
that the clerk who made out the document merely
glanced at Bull's face and made a random guess at
his age.
The Oxford picture is reproduced on the opposite
page, from a photograph ; the original is on panel,
size i foot 10 inches by i foot 6 inches.
Another fine portrait of Bull, painted later in life,
at Antwerp, on panel, 14 inches by 10, forms the
frontispiece to this book ; the musician is depicted
in the act of conducting, with a music book open
before him. The original oil painting is in my
own possession.
* This inscription was noted by Ward in 1760, by Hawkins in 1776, and an
engraving from the picture inserted in the history of Music by the latter. It was
to be seen on the portrait in 1885, when on loan at the " International Inventions
Exhibition," at the Albert Hall, as I can vouch from my own observation. I am
told by a resident in Oxford " the portrait was in a very bad state from exposure
to damp and the action of the sun, and was sent with some others to be restored
some years since." Unfortunately the age has been altered from 26 to 27.
DR. JOHN BULL.
From a picture painted in England. 1589.
To face p.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
GULIELMUS A MESSAUS.
Guillaume Messaus was born towards the end of
the i6th century, and lived at Antwerp, where he
was held in considerable reputation as a composer
and organist, and also as Chapel Master, or Director
of the Music, in the Church of St. Walburge, one of
the most ancient ecclesiastical edifices in Antwerp,
unfortunately demolished about 1809. Messaus
was a pupil of Dr. John Bull, Organist of Antwerp
Cathedral, whose compositions he very industriously
and voluminously transcribed. Music composed by
Messaus is to be found in the " Laudes vespertinae
B. Marise Virginis etem, Hymnus, etc," published
by P. Phalese, Antwerp, 1629. The contents of the
collection are as follows : —
1. Ave regina ccelorum a 4 voix.
2. Quia quern meruiste a 5 voix.
3. Nobis datus.
4. Verbum caro a 5 voix.
5. Vita dulcedo a 6 voix.
6. Resonet in laudibus.
7. Beate immaculata.
8. O quam amabilis a 4 voix.
9. Ita dulcedo vita.
Chansons (in four parts) : —
1. Gen Kindeken is geboren.
2. Het viel eens's Hemels dauwe.
3. Laet ons met heste reij ne.
4. O Salich heylich Bettlehem.
5. Waer is die dochters van Sijon.
( 99 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
6. Heden is ons een Kindeken gheboren.
7. Loffo sydat soete Kindeken eleyn.
8. Nu laet ons singhen het is tydt.
9. Ghegroot soet moel ghy zyn.
10. Met desen nieuwen jaere.
n. Het quamen dry Coninghen.
There are also compositions by Messaus in the
following works : —
Livre premier des chansons vulgaires de diverses lutheurs
a 4 parties, etc. En Anvers, chez les heritiers de Pierre Phalese
au Roy David, 1636.
Cantiones Sacra; de Messaus edite a Anvers, chez les
heritiers de P. Phalese, 1635.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
ANTHONY YOUNG.
A claim has been made on behalf of Anthony
Young as the composer of "God save the King,"
but it is based on such a flimsy foundation that it
scarcely deserves mention.
The Gentleman's Magazine, of 1796, printed the
following letter : —
Jan. 20, 1796.
Mr. Urban,
The present deservedly popular air of " God save the King "
is supposed to have been composed by Anthony Jones, musician,
contemporary with Purcell, and grandfather of the late Mrs.
Arne, Mrs. Lampe, and Mrs. Jones, all stage singers, while
spinsters, by the name of Young. When this tune was revived,
in 1745, tradition says that the words of " God save the King "
were written, and the tune composed for King James the
Second, at the time the Prince of Orange was expected to
land in England. During the rebellion of 1745, Dr. Burney
author of the " General History of Music," composed parts to
the old melody, at the desire of Mrs. Cibber, for Drury Lane
Theatre, where it was sung in a slow and solemn manner, in
three parts, by Mrs. Cibber, Mr. Beard, and Mr. Reinhold, the
father of the present singer of that name, and repeated in
chorus, augmented in force, usually by the whole audience. It
was called for at this theatre for near two years after the
suppression of the rebellion.
About three years ago, being curious to know some further
particulars respecting this majestic song, I waited on Dr.
Cooke, late organist of the Abbey, who corroborated this
account, and told me, that, when he was a boy, he remembered
to have heard the tune sung to the words of " God save great
James our King."
E. T.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Note here the error of describing Anthony Jones
as the grandfather of the Misses Young — the latter
was their birth name. They were daughters of
Charles Young, who was organist of Allhallows'
Church, Barking, from 1713 to 1758, and he was
supposed to be (it is not proven) the son of Anthony
Young who was organist of the Churches St.
Clement Danes and St. Catherine Cree, but never of
Allhallows', Barking.
The mistake in naming Jones as the grandfather of
the Young family was doubtless quickly discovered,
and about 1805 a copy of " God save the King " was
published with the heading, "This air was composed
by Mr. Anthony Young, late organist of Allhallows',
Barking, Essex." The printers and publishers
were Riley and Willis, 23, Commerce Row,
Blackfriars Road.
The anonymous letter of E. T., and the above-
mentioned obscure and unauthorised publications,
appear to be the only evidence which can be adduced
in favour of Anthony Young. It must be remembered
that in 1795 George Saville Carey commenced his
attempt to obtain a pension, thereby calling attention
to the subject, and affording an opening for the
erroneous letter of E. T. in the Gentleman's
Magazine, 1796. That Arne arranged the air for
performance in Covent Garden, and Burney for that
in Drury Lane, has already been shown.
( 102 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
OSWALD'S AIR.
There have been suggestions that possibly James
Oswald, a musician and music publisher, who came
to London from Scotland in 1741, may have had
some part in the making or arranging of " God save
the King."
The whole story is grounded on a statement made
by Clark (p. 27, " An account of the National
Anthem "), which is as follows : —
The editor being a native of Windsor, and knowing that
the chimes of the parish church played the tune of " God save
the King," under the title of " Osweld's Are," wrote to his friend
Tho. Jenner to get him a copy of the brass plate containing
the names of all the tunes which are played by the bells : who
sent him the following account : —
" Sir, — After some trouble, I have succeeded in getting you
the names of the tunes which the chimes of the Parish Church
of Windsor play. We could not discover the plate for many
days, in consequence of its being so crowded with dirt, the
chimes not having played for five or six years past.
"They are thus put down on the brass plate : — i. 'Highland
Laddie1; 2. 'Happy Clown'; 3. 'Osweld's Are'; 4. 'A
Minuet'; 6. 'Milton's J'gg'; 7- 'Lady Chatham's Jigg';
8. '113 Psalm.' "
Clark adds, page 29 :—
The bells were first put up in the parish church of Windsor
in the year 1769, and the barrel of the chimes was arranged by
Mr. Oswald, a musicseller in St. Martin's Lane, who on that
account probably, called the tune after his own name.
Clark seems to have muddled everything he wrote
about, and in the above statement there are two
( 103 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
difficulties. First of all, it is very significant that
the tune No. 5 is omitted from the list given ;
probably this was " God save the King," which being
well known, there was no occasion to name it.
This leaves the " Osweld Are " in full possession of
No. 3.
Secondly, according to the Gentleman's Magazine,
James Oswald died at Knebworth, Herts, on January
2, 1769. How then could he have arranged the
chiming barrel for bells which were placed after his
death ?
We have no authority beyond Clark's assertion
that Oswald prepared the barrel; if he had done so
he would probably have spelt his name properly.
I take it that Osweld's Are, Milton's Jigg, and
Lady Chatham's Jigg, were simply the names of
tunes and not necessarily those of composers.
( 104 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
FOREIGN VERSIONS OF "GOD SAVE
THE KING."
The earliest printed Continental version of " God
save the King," is that in " La lire Magonne, ou
Recueil de Chansons des Francs-Magons. Revu,
corrige, mis dans un nouvel ordre, & augments de
quantite de chansons, qui n'avoient point encore
paru ; par les freres de Vignoles et du Bois. Avec
les Airs notes, mis sur la bonne Clef, tant pour le
Chant que pour le Violon & la Flute. A la Haye,
Chez R. van Laak, Libraire M.DCC.LXIII." On
page 161 of that book the tune appears as follows :—
D'ONGEVEINSDHEID.
Stem : God Seav* great George our King.
O las - ter - ziek Ge-meen, Ve - racht vry bui - ten reen
f^£
uyt er - k'le nydt, De vry - c met - ze laars : Uw' blind-heit
is niet raers.Wyl wy by Dag en kaers, 2ien , . tot uw spyt.
Six verses follow which need not be quoted. The
music in the book is printed from type, and it is
curious to note that in a second edition, published
in 1775, a terrible blunder is made of the end of the
first strain. It will not fail to be observed that the
second part of the tune, as printed above, even to
* Sic.
( 105 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
the concluding bars, is identical with the most
modern use.
A version was made for Denmark by Harries,
which appeared in the "Flensburgsch.es Wochenblat,"
January 27, 1790. The first line was " Heil Dir,
dem liebenden," and it was explicitly said to be
intended to be sung on the King's birthday,* to the
air of " God save great George the King."
The German form to the words " Heil Dir im
Siegerkranz," was written by Balthasar Gerhard
Schumacher, and was first published in the
Spenersche Zeitung, in Berlin, December 17, 1793.
It was afterwards adopted as a national song by
Prussia, Saxony, and other German States.
It must, however, have been familiar to German
folk in 1791, for in May of that year was published
" Vier und zwanzig Veranderungen furs Clavichord
oder Fortepiano auf das englische Volkslied : God
save the King, von Johann Nicolaus Forkel.
Gottingen, beym Autor, und in der Vandenhoek-
Ruprechtischen Buchandlung." — (Four and twenty
variations for the Clavichord or Fortepiano on the
English People's-song "God save the King" (by
Johann Nicolaus Forkel). The music is intro-
duced in an interesting Preface, of which I give a
translation : —
The following variations have been specially written on
the departure of the two Royal Princes of England, Ernst
August and Adolf Friedrich from the University (Gottingen).
The affection for all that is pure and beautiful attracted these
noble King's sons also to the art of music, an ennobling
recreation of Princes, and during their stay in Gottingen,
they were amongst the most enthusiastic and attentive of the
* Christian the 7th, brother-in-law of King George of England.
( 106 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
audience, who were present at the Academic concerts. Their
condescension, good will and sympathy, with which they
honoured these musical gatherings from 1786 to the beginning
of the year 1791, raised in me the wish to shew them a small
proof of my gratitude, respectful esteem, and love, on the day
on which for the last time the audience had the honour of
their presence. This I thought I could best accomplish by
introducing a farewell song at the end of the concert, choosing
a well-known melody which the whole audience could join in.
The English People's melody, " God save the King," seemed
to me to be appropriate, and I chose it also more particularly
as it would be the most pleasing to the two Princes, being
their National Song. After I had first played the melody with
some variations on a Fortepiano, the following verses were
sung with four solo voices and full chorus alternately : —
Heil, theures Furstenpaar! Am schonsten Seegen reich,
Aus Herzen, treu und wahr, Und Eurem Werthe gleich
Seyd uns gegriisst ! Sey Euer Loos !
Mit hulderfulltem Blick Euch adle eigner Muth
Seht auf den Kreis zuriick Wie Eurer Vater Blut:
Der Eurer Nahe Gliick Georg ist gross und gut,
Heut noch geniest ! Und gut und gross!
Kiihn wandelt Ihr hinan Gott schirme seinen Thron !
Des Ruhmes steile Bahn ; Gott geb' ihm hohen Lohn
Drum Heil Euch, Heil ! Und Fried' und Heil !
Es gliiht in Eurer Brust Und Lieb' und Ehrfurchtsvoll,
Der eignen Kraft bewusst, Heiss betend fur sein Wol,
Erhabne Thatenlust Ihm bringen Dankes Zoll,
Drum Heil Euch, Heil ! Sey unser Theil !
As I wished and expected, a large number of the audience
present joined in with the full chorus, which was not pre-
arranged ; that surprise and the circumstances of the time
made the song far more solemn and effective than it would
have perhaps otherwise been, and I must acknowledge that
I never before appreciated this melody so much as when I
learnt to do so under these conditions. It attracted me so
much by its simplicity, that I thought it worth the trouble
of adding some artistic variations. If this work of art is so
formed, that it does not hide but improve the original shape of
so solemn and so loved a National song, then the motive for its
production will be found the more worthy by connoisseurs.
Gottin, im May 1791. J. N. Forkel.
{ 107 ) H
GOD SAVE THE KING.
The music as arranged by Forkel, who was a
pupil of Bach, is in the key of D ; the only point
worthy of special mention is that he marks it
" Tempo di Minuetto."
Beethoven highly appreciated the air of " God
save the King." He used it as a theme for a set of
seven variations in C for the pianoforte in 1804 ; he
arranged it for solo and chorus with accompaniments
for pianoforte, violin, and violoncello ; and he com-
posed, in 1813, a work entitled " Wellington's Sieg
oder Schlacht bei Vittoria," which he dedicated to
George, the Prince Regent of England. This
orchestral piece contains the air, and whilst working
at the score, Beethoven inscribed in his diary
" Ich muss den Englandern ein wenig zeigen,
was in dem ' God save the King ' fur ein Segen ist "
(I must show the English a little, what a blessing
they have in their " God save the King").
The subjoined facsimile is taken from one of
Beethoven's sketch - books, now in the British
Museum (Add. MSS. 29,801. /82a). It is not
possible to ascertain for what particular work he
intended these bars. The pianoforte variations,
as stated above, are in C, whilst this sketch is
in G. The words written over the last bar, " mit
dem Beinschieber," seem to have reference to the
lever which is to be found in Stein's and other
German pianofortes of the time. The performer
could, by pressing the lever with the knee, raise
the dampers over the strings.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Weber was also very fond of the tune of " God
save the King." He introduced it into his cantata,
" KampfundSieg" (No. 9), in his " Jubel" Overture,
and twice arranged it for voices, in the keys of D
and B flat.
In America, the tune of " God save the King " was
adapted to a hymn at a very early period and
printed in a book entitled : —
Urania or a choice selection of Psalm-tunes, Anthems
and Hymns, from the most approved authors, with some
entirely new ; in two, three and four parts, the whole peculiarly
adapted to the use of Churches and private families ; to which
are preGxed the plainest and most necessary rules of Psalmody,
by James Lyon, A.B.
The title-page is handsomely "engraved by Henry
Dawkins, 1761." The place of publication is not
mentioned, but it is believed to have been at
Philadelphia, soon after 1761. The music and hymn
are called " Whitefield's." The hymn commences
with the words " Come, Thou Almighty King,"
and as they appear in the sixth edition of
G. Whitefield's collection, published in London
in 1757, the adoption of the name is accounted for.
Another set of words adapted to the tune of "God
save the King" is very popular in the United States.
They were written by Charles Timothy Brooks,
Unitarian Minister, of Salem, Massachusetts, born
in 1813. The first verse commences: —
God bless our native land ;
Firm may she ever stand ;
Through storm and night.
GOD SAVE THE KING.
SOUVENIRS DE LA MARQUISE DE CREQUI, 1710 A 1800.
TOMES PREMIER ET SECOND. PARIS. 1834.*
Infinite are the shapes of falsehood and depuisfeu Protee, as
Madame du Deffand pleasantly says, nothing can equal the
versatility of a Parisian manufacturer of memoirs. One
day he is a dramatist — the next a bishop — by and by a monarch
— then a jacobin — and in succession, a minister of state, and a
thief-taker — a damsel of the Palais Royal, and a duchess of the
Louvre. That there was a Madame de Crequi, who lived to a
great old age, and was remarkable for a lively youth and an
aimable vieillesse, is very well known ; but that she wrote these
volumes is, we confidently believe to be, the most insigne
mensonge that ever was propounded. The fabricators are hard
pushed ; they find that the memoirs of men, and particularly of
men of the present, or even of the last, generation, are liable
to be tried, and, if false, detected, by tests which no ingenuity
can elude. A man is either a statesman or a soldier — a cleric
or a commis—3. lawyer or a litterateur — and the sayings and
doings of such men leave traces in their several walks of life
which can neither be imitated nor obliterated. A forgery is
in such cases easily detected, and the trade, instead of being
profitable, becomes a losing concern. They have now, there-
fore, thought it prudent to try what they can do in female
attire. The commerage of an old lady deals little in that class
of facts or dates which, being preserved in authentic history,
afford the best test of the authenticity of memoirs ; and they
are now trying how far the public may be deluded by that
trivial gossip, as to the truth or falsehood of which few care,
and still fewer examine.
Some of these manufacturers, looking about for a subject
proper for their purpose, have lighted upon Madame de Crequi,
a lady who — as the Biographies tell us and them — ' died at a
very advanced age in 1803 ; who was remarkable for social and
conversational talents ; and who left behind her several manu-
scripts.' 'Upon that hint they speak;' and this, we believe,
is all that the author of this work knows of the lady, in whose
* Reprinted from the Quarterly Review, March and June, 1834.
( I" )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
name and character he writes. He found, in two or three
authentic works, notices of a Madame de Crequi — stated to
have been born under Louis XIV., and to have died under
Napoleon ; and he therefore adopted her life as a canvass on
which he might fearlessly spread all the anecdotic colours
which he could collect from Dangeau, St. Simon, Bachaumont,
Marmontel, Walpole, and Mesdames de Sevigne, Maintenon,
De Stael, and Du Deffand.
The French critics believe — (it is wonderful how credulous
French critics are prior to a detection, and how clear-sighted
they become when a forgery is proved) — the French critics we
say, affect to believe that there is a petit noyeau de verite which
is swelled into its present bulk by a vast deal of supposititious
matter : in short, that some scattered manuscripts of Madame
de Crequi have fallen into the hands of the editor, who has
diluted her spirit into the gallons of washy stuff which fill these
two octavos, and which are destined — if the public will but
consent to be duped — to fill ten or a dozen similar tomes. This
theory we absolutely disbelieve. We do not think that there is
one genuine drop of Madame de Crequi in the whole publica-
tion ; we are confident, and shall prove, that the ' Memoires'
are, in every point of view, a complete forgery — the grossest and
most impudent of impostures ; for not only are the facts false, and
the work spurious, but the very person to whom they are
attributed is a phantom created by the ignorance of the fabricator,
who, having very ridiculously mistaken one lady of the family
of Crequi for another, builds his whole edifice on this funda-
mental blunder. This seems incredible, but we think we can
put it beyond all doubt. The account the editor gives of his
author is as follows : —
'Rente Charlotte Victoire de Froulay de Tesse, Marchioness
of Crequy, of Heymont, of Canaples, &c., was one of the
women of her day the most remarkable for superiority and
originality of mind. She died at the age of near an hundred.
She had been presented to Louis XIV. in 1713, and had had
an audience of the First Consul in the twelfth year of the
republic (1804).' — Prospectus.
The date of her birth is not given ; but as she was only near
an hundred when she died, and as she was presented to the
First Consul in September, 1804, she must have been born, at
soonest, in 1705, and must therefore have been presented to
Louis XIV. when she was eight years old. This little difficulty,
GOD SAVE THE KING.
however, was discovered between the publication of the
Prospectus and that of the work itself; and in the latter SHE is
made to palliate the inconsistency by saying that she is not
sure whether she was born in 1699 or in 1700, or in 1701 — that
she left her convent in Brittany, and came to Paris in the last
days of 1713 — that she saw Louis twice or thrice between that
period and his death in 1715 — that she was married during or
immediately after the mourning for that prince — and that her
interview with Buonaparte was on Septidi de la troisieme
decade de Vendemiaire, an xi (2jth Sept., 1803), so that, instead
of being near an hundred, as the Prospectus announced, she
was by her own account, at least one hundred and two, or
perhaps one hundred and four.
But little interested as we feel in the private history of the
Froulay family, we are enabled to remove a considerable
portion of the uncertainty under which the lady is represented
as labouring as to the year of her birth. She says her mother
died an hour before she was born — that her father was then at
the head of his regiment on the frontiers of Germany — that he
was soon after made prisoner by the enemy, and remained so
for seventeen months, and never heard of her birth nor of her
mother's death till his arrival at Versailles, where his uncle,
the Marechal de Tesse, informed him of these events, and
obliged him to put himself into mourning. Now it happens to
be known (' Memoires de Tesse,' t. i. p. 182) that the Count de
Tesse (he was not Marechal till 1703) left Versailles on the 4th
December, 1700, for Italy, where he remained for some years
in command of the French army, so that it was not later than
the 3d December, 1700, that he could have seen at Versailles
Madame de Crequi's father — who was not, soit dit en passant,
his nephew. Deduct the seventeen months of captivity from
that date, and we are brought back to July, 1699, as the latest
possible day for the birth of our heroine — she was, therefore,
thirteen and a half when she left her convent — fourteen or
fifteen when she was presented to Louis XIV., and near
seventeen at her marriage — all much more credible than
the other story ; but then ' incidit in Scyllam cupiens vitare
Charibdim,' she must have been not near an hundred, but
above one hundred and four at her interview with Buonaparte,
if it took place An XI. — as she says — and above one hundred
and five — if it took place, as the editor originally announced,
An XII. Imagine a lady writing her memoirs at one hundred
( "3 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
and four ! But it may be said that she only added a few notes
at this very advanced age, and that the great body of the
Memoirs was written some years before. They were written,
she says, for the instruction of her grandson ; and the editor
tells us that he died long before his grandmother — very well —
but if this were so, why, when she was correcting and adding
notes to her Memoirs in 1803, did she leave untouched the
Dedication to her grandson, who had been long dead; and why,
in the very note which records her interview with Buonaparte,
does she still talk, as if to her grandson, of the consul's promise
to restore to them ' our forfeited estates ? ' for, after this grand-
son's death, there was no one to whom she could have
designated the estates as ours. And why does she, in a
passage, which must, as appears from the context, have been
written subsequent to 1793, address her grandson as a child —
je votis conterai une histoire de voleur, mon petit prince — (vol. ii.
p. 65) — when we see from another passage (vol. i. p. 137) that
the petit prince (who never was a prince at all) must have been
born prior to 1756 ?
But every page of the work proves, by its style and topics,
that it is of very recent composition. This, if it were worth
while to enter into such details, we think we could prove, from
the idiom and orthography ; nay, we are convinced by several
political allusions, that it has been wholly written since the
revolution of July. But such an examination would be, as our
readers will see presently, a perfect waste of time in so flagrant
a case as this. We shall content ourselves with two or three
instances, which will prove that they are of too recent date to
be the production of the imputed author.
In many passages of the work, the author quotes and fre-
quently criticises and contradicts the Memoirs of St. Simon,
and, indeed, St. Simon supplies a very considerable part of the
matter of the work. Now, the Memoirs of St. Simon were not
published till 1788, and then but imperfectly, while this writer
alludes to more recent additions. We hear of the National
Assembly (vol. ii. p. 123), and of the Revolutionary Tribunal
(p. 132), and specifically of Philippe Egalite (p. 33), and
Citizen Foucke (p. 104), and in the midst of a story, in which
she apostrophizes her grandson as still living, she talks of the
horrors of 1793 as already a matter of history. All this brings
the composition of the work down to, at the earliest, 1794,
at which time she would be about ninety-Jive years old — rather
( "4 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
an advanced age to commence writing thirteen volumes of
memoirs — for such we are told is the extent of her work.
' Credat Judgus ! ' But what follows would be too much for
the credulity, we will not say of a Jew, but even of the Parisian
public. The fictitious marquise thinks it necessary to be
acquainted with all the eminent persons of the century em-
braced by her Memoirs, and accordingly she introduces, about
the year 1714, the Marquis Dangeau.
' They said at the time (on disait alors) that he was writing
his memoirs, and when they appeared (quand je les ai vu
paraitre) they seemed to me neither more interesting or less
insignificant than their author.' — vol. i. p. 128.
Now, the Memoirs of the Marquis Dangeau did not appear
till 1817, fourteen years after Madame de Crequi's death.
These, and a hundred other anachronisms are not in stray
paragraphs, or explanatory notes, or subsequent insertions —
they are interwoven with the body of the work, and accom-
panied by, and dovetailed into the most elaborate falsehoods
and fabrications. Let us give our readers another example : —
In a visit to Rome in 1722, Madame de Crequi is represented as
meeting a ' certain Duchess of Bedford and her daughter,'
' Milady Marquionesse (as her mother called her) de Tavistock,''
who are the most ridiculous personages that can be imagined,
and of whom, particularly of the Marquionesse de Tavistock,
the Memoirs tell us the most absurd stories. It may be very
true, as the Memoirs say, that all Englishwomen are mad and
vulgar — but at least the lady here specially attacked must be
acquitted of the specific charges made against her — for luckily
there happens to have been no Lady Tavistock between the
yeats 1700 and 1764. In 1722, there existed a Duchess
Dowager of Bedford, (who died in 1724, at Streatham,) and
in 1725, her son, the third duke, married Lady Anne Egerton,
and it was not till the marriage of the son of the fourth
duke in 1764, that there was a Marchioness of Tavistock.
But it is mere waste of time to dwell on such trifles — we now
revert to our former statement, that not merely is the book
spurious, but the lady to whom it is attributed is a phantom of
the fabricator's imagination. We beg our reader's attention to
the exposure of this miraculous mistake.
We find in the French Biographic Universelle, article
CREQUI, the following notice : —
' The Marquise de Crequi (married in 1720 to the Marquis
( "5 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
de Crequi) deserves to be reckoned amongst the most celebrated
women of the eighteenth century. She loved literature and
cultivated it, and died in Paris in 1803, at a great age, leaving
a fine library to her executors, and several manuscripts —
amongst others, Thoughts and Reflections on different
Subjects.'
Here we have the germ of these Memoirs — a Madame de
Crequi, of great wit and talents, who dies at a great age, who
might have seen both Louis XIV. and the First Consul, and
bequeaths copious manuscripts to her executors — and this is,
no doubt, the lady of whom the Princess des Ursins writes (as
triumphantly quoted by the editor) from Rome, in 1722.
' The young Marquise de Crequi is distinguished by the
dignity of her manners, the graces of her mind, the originality
of her conversation, and the propriety of her conduct.' —
vol. i. p. 2.
The editor quotes also, with great confidence and com-
placency, the eulogies of Voltaire and Rousseau, and (so late
as 1788) of Delille. All this looks at first sight like an
important, and, indeed, conclusive corroboration of the
authenticity of these Memoirs ; but alas ! alas ! we hardly
know how to announce so direful a denouement of this fable —
there have been TWO Marquises de Crequi — the one the lady
mentioned in the Biographic, whose maiden name was Anne
Louise Lefevre d'Auxy, and who was married in 1720, and
whose husband died in 1771 ; and the other — the lady to whom
these Memoirs are attributed — Renee Charlotte de Froulay,
the wife of a gentleman of another branch of the Crequi
family, which, on the death of the husband of Anne, in 1771,
claimed the Marquisate of Crequi. Anne Lefevre d'Auxy was,
no doubt, born early in the century, as she was married in 1720,
and she was the only Marquise de Crequi existing till 1771.
Renee de Froulay was not born till 1715, (the year in which the
author of the Memoirs pretends she was married ;) — she was
really married in 1737 to the Marquis de Heymont, and her son
became, on the death of his cousin — in 1771— Marquis de
Crequi, and she may, for aught we know, have also called
herself Madame de Crequi. All this will be made quite clear
by the following tabular view of the genealogy of the family,
extracted from Moreri and La Chesnay des Bois.
( "6 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
oo £
£a
.S<5
c-S'3
£ to cr
O 3 vl>
S C. .2
>, O 3
^•a 2*
_E ±: c«
•3-5 -
( "7 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
So that the centenaire Madame de Crequi (if ever such a
centenairc existed) was Anne Lefevre d'Auxy, the aunt, a la
mode de Bretagne, of Renee de Froulay, who, in the Memoirs,
usurps her age, her place, and her honours. What could have
led to this extraordinary blunder we cannot venture positively
to assert, but we suspect that an error in the Biographic has
misled the fabricator. We doubt that the lady who died in
1803 was Anne Lefevre ; we rather think it was Renee de
Froulay, because we know that the Baron de Breteuil inherited
some property from the lady who died in 1803, and the
Breteuils were certainly allied to the Froulays, and not, that we
can discover, to the Lefevres d'Auxy. But as Renee de
Froulay, who was born after the death of Louis XIV., would
not have answered the fabricator's purpose, he confounds her
with her aunt ; and by taking the birth of one and the death of
the other, he completes his fable of a ' centenaire.' We see,
indeed, that the fabricator had some misgivings that he was not
on sure ground. He says Madame de Crequi complains of the
inaccuracies of the dates in Moreri and La Chesnay des Bois.
This it was quite necessary to do, because, having set out with
the wrong person, he found it impossible to manage the dates,
and he hoped to evade detection by thus denying the authorities
which he could not reconcile : but he does not seem to have
any suspicion that the cause of his difficulties was his having
got, if we may use Queen Bess's homely expression, the wrong
sow by the ear. Biographies and genealogies are, we well
know, very liable to errors of date, but such a mistake as Anne
Lefevre d'Auxy in one generation, for Renee de Froulay in
another, we hardly think possible. But it is remarkable that,
in this case, there seems additional reason for giving credit to
the genealogists. First, the Biographic Universelle does
not copy the genealogies, yet agrees with them
as to the birth and marriage of Anne Lefevre: secondly,
the edition of Moreri, in 1728, makes no mention of Renee de
Froulay — which it would have probably done had she been
married in 1715 — but the edition of 1759, which continues the
history of the family, introduces Renee as married to the
Marquis de Heymont in 1737 : thirdly, in the edition of La
Chesnay des Bois, in 1772, that writer continues still further
the genealogy, and notices the death of James, Marquis de
Crequi, in the preceding year, and adds, ' that by this event
Charles, the son of Renee de Froulay, has become ?*larquis de
( "8 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
Crequi :' and, fourthly, we find that the genealogies of the two
different families of Tesse and Crequi agree in the same story.
That of the Crequi family is given in the foregoing table : and
in that of the Froulay family it is stated that ' Rente Charlotte
de Froulay was married on the i8th of March, 1737, to Louis
de Crequi, Marquis de Heymont, cadet de la branche
ainee de la maison de Crequi.' We must further remark
that out of this genealogy of the Froulays arises another
remarkable contradiction in point of fact to the statements of
the Memoirs. The Marquise Rente is made to say, that the
death of her brother in his youth was, by her thus becoming
an heiress, the cause of her marriage with M. de Crequi.
Now, it appears, if any faith is due to history, that Renee's
brother, the Marquis de Froulay, survived her marriage
above eight years ; and that, so far from dying a youth prior to
1713, he was a general officer, killed at the battle of Lafeldt,
nth July, 1745.
Our readers may ask how it is possible that any man of
common sense and of the most superficial literature could
fall into such extraordinary — such obvious mistakes? We
might content ourselves with replying, in the words of
Moliere —
' Vous avez raison ; et ia chose, a chacun,
Hors de creance doit paroitre ;
Un conte extravagant, ridicule, importun,
Cela choque le sens commun —
Mais cela ne laisse pas d'etre !'
We have only to state the facts, and cannot be expected to
account for such strange inaccuracy ; but the bold ignorance of
some modern French writers is quite amazing. We proved in a
former number* that M. Lemontey — the editor of Dangeau's
' Memoirs ' — the author of an historical [essay on the reign of
Louis XIV., on the strength of which essay he was elected into
the French Academy — showed, in that said essay, that he had
never read (though he did not fail to quote) the ' Memoirs' of
St. Simon, and had attributed to an anonymous satirist — ' whose
name he lamented he could not discover ' — some of the most
remarkable and best known passages of St. Simon's work.
After such an example of the learning of the academicians, we
cannot be surprised at any degree of ignorance in the obscure
* See Quarterly Review, vol. XIX. p. 476.
( "9 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
tribe who live by that disreputable class of fabrications which
it has of late been our duty to expose.
We add, that the literary merit of the work is worse than
nothing — vulgar trash — stupid threadbare stories, not only
common to all the French jest-books, but to be found in our
own Joe Miller — indecent in many passages, disgusting in
more, contemptible in all.
*** Since writing the above, we have received from Paris the
result of a search which we caused to be made in the official
registers of burial in that city. It confirms all we have said,
and all we suspected. The lady who died in 1803, (14 Pluviose,
an. xi.) was Renee de Froulay — born in 1715 — the widow of
Louis Marie de Crequi. This settles the matter
( 120 )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
HENRY CAREY ON COPYRIGHT.
All Authors are ambitious of reputation, tho' few
obtain it. I am resolv'd to stand Candidate, how-
ever ; if I succeed, it will overpay my Labours ; if I
fail, it shall be a Warning to me for the future.
—Cantatas. 1724. By HENRY CAREY.
In the first edition of "The Musical Century,"
published in 1737, Carey, in the Preface, alludes to
the absence of copyright for musical works, as
follows : —
As these little Labours are the Offspring of my own Brain, I
confess I retain a paternal Concern for them, and am willing
to send them into the World in the best Manner I am able.
Besides, many of my Friends being willing to collect 'em,
I chose this method of Publication, for here they have them
Compleat and Correct, in one Entire Edition of my own, at less
than the tenth Part of the Expence, they must otherwise be at
to purchase them, as scattered Abroad in false and surreptitious
Scraps and Miscellanies, published by other Hands.
What retarded the Publication thus long, was the Prospect,
I had from an Act depending in Parliament, for securing the
right of copies to Authors or their Assigns, &c., it being almost
incredible how much I have suffer'd by having my Works
Pyrated ; my loss on that Account, for many Years past,
amounting to near £300 per Annum. As the Justice of such
a Law is self Evident ; and an Act already made in Favour of
Engravers, I doubt not but the Wisdom and Humanity of the
Legislature, will regulate this Affair, not confining the property
of Authors, &c., to one particular Branch, but extending it to
the Benefit of Arts and Sciences in General.
This method of Subscription, is the only one I can take to
defend me from Pyrates, and as I publish so cheap none can
well undersell me.
( "I )
GOD SAVE THE KING.
SONG
Written and Composed by CHARLES DIBDIN
For his Entertainment called The Quizes, or A Trip to Elysium. Printed and
sold by the Author at his Music Warehouse, No. in Strand, opposite the
Adelphi (1792).
All true honest Britons, I pray you draw near ;
Bear a bob in the chorus to hail the new year ;
Join the mode of the times, and with heart and voice sing
A good old English burden — 'tis " God save the King ! "
Let the year Ninety-three
Commemorated be
To time's end ; for so long loyal Britons shall sing
Heart and voice, the good choius of " God save the King ! "
See with two different faces old Janus appear,
To frown out the old, and smile in the new year ;
And then, while he proves a well-wisher to crowns,
On the loyal he smiles, on the factious he frowns.
For in famed Ninety-three,
Britons all shall agree,
With one voice and one heart in a chorus to sing,
Drowning faction and party in " God save the King ! "
Some praise a new freedom imported from France :
Is liberty taught them like teaching to dance ?
They teach freedom to Britons ! our own right divine !
A rushlight might as well teach the sun how to shine !
In fam'd Ninety-three,
We'll convince them we're free !
Free from every licentiousness faction can bring ;
Free with heart and with voice to sing " God save the King ! "
Thus, here though French fashions may please for their day,
As children prize playthings, then throw them away ;
In a country like England they never do hurt ;
We improved on the ruffle, by adding the skirt.
Thus in famed Ninety-three
Britons all shall agree,
While with one heart and voice in loud chorus they sing
To improve " Ca'ira " into " God save the King!"
( 122 )
INDEX.
PAGE
Aberdeen (Cantus) 65
Academy of Ancient Music ... 40
American Version ... ... ... no
Arne 33, 85
Augusta (Princess of Wales) 40
Bach it
Balnea, The 46
Banks, Sir Joseph ... 37
Banquet (Merchant Taylors') ... ... ... 89
Beard 33.8s
Beethoven's Opinion i, 108
Blow ... ... 12
Bull 4,5,17,18,25,59,69,73-82,91
Bull — portrait (1625) ... Frontispiece
Bull— portrait (1589) 98
Burney 33, 34, 35, 38, 55
Byrde 7, 92
Cantus (Forbes) 65
Carey i, 35, 45, 52, 56, 68, 121
Chappell .. ... 19, 22
Chrysander 54
Cibber 33-85
Clark i
Clark, Mrs 28
Copyright (Carey) ... ... ... ... . . ... 121
Cousen de St. Malo ... ... ... 59
Covent Garden Theatre ... ... ... ... ... ... 30
Danish Version ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 106
Death or Victory ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 52
Dibdin ... ... ... ... ... ... 46, 122
( 123 ) i
INDEX.
PAGE
Drury Lane Theatre ... 30-32
Dutch Version ... 105
Elizabeth, Queen ... 92
Fame let thy trumpet sound 43
Forbes (Cantus) 65
Forkel 106
Garrick ... ... ... ... ... 33
Gauntlett 23, 27
Gentleman's Magazine 29, 51
German Version ... ... 106
God save our Lord the King ... 69
God save the King 9, 10, 12, 20, 29, 32, 33, 44, 73, 82
God save the King (Foreign Versions) 105
God save the King, I pray ... ... 64
Gould, Rev. Baring ... ... ... ... I
Grand Dieu, sauvez le Roy... ... ... 60
Gresham College 91
Gyles 4
Handel 42, 56, 61
Harington 48
Harmonia Anglicana 30, 32
Harries 106
He comes, the hero comes 51
Heidegger 42
Hiks, Sir Michaell 94
Houghton, Lord ••• 58
Hunter 14
Jones ... ... ... ... ... 10
Jonson 3, 7, 13, 89, 90
King of Hanover 20,22,26
King James I. ... ... ... ... ••• 3
King James II. 34
Kitchener 10, 17
La lire Mafonne 105
Learn, ye Britons 52
Lully 59, 60, 61
( "4 )
INDEX.
PAGE
Mackay ... 63
Madden, Sir Francis .. ... 15, 26
Maintenon, Madame de ••• 59
Marquise de Crequi, Souvenirs de la 59,111
Melismata 65
Merchant Taylors' Company 2,3,89
Messaus ... ... ... ... 18, 99
Muses Delight, The 42
Music —
Bull's Ayre. Copied by Rimbault 20
Fame let thy trumpet sound 44
God save the Kinge (Bull) 73
Ditto 82
God save our Lord the King (1740) 83
Ditto (i745) 84
God save our noble King (Arne's score) 85
Largo (Purcell) 67
Lesson (Purcell) ... ... 68
O lasterziek Gemeen 105
Remember, O thou man 66
Musical Century 53
Musical Miscellany ... 52
Non nobis, Domine 7, 13
O Deus Optime 38
O good God, preserve our King ... ... ... 39
Oswald 31, 103
Pepusch 8, 40
Perth, Duchess of 60
Phillipps ... ... ... ... ... 36
Purcell 12, 66, 67, 68
Ravenscroft ... ... ... ... 66
Reinhold 33, 85
Remember, O thou man 66
Rimbault 13, 19, 41, 54
Royal Society of Musicians 57
St. Cyr 59
Saville 13, 15
( "5 )
INDEX.
PAGE
Schumacher ... ... ... ... 106
Scottish Origin ... 63
Sheppard, Rev. Edgar 31
Smart, Sir George 21.82
Smith 48, 53, 56
Stevens ... ... ... ... 40
Stow1 s Annals ... ... ... ... 5
Thesaurus Musicus ... ... ... ... 29, 31, 43
Travers ... ... ... ... 39
Trumbull 96
Victor 33
Wade, Marshal 48
Walpole, Horace ... ... 34
Walter ... ... ... ... ... 94
Ward
Warren ... ... ... 16
Weber no
Wooldridge, Professor ... 30, 65
Young
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY
Los Angeles
This book is DUE on the last date stamped below.
/N® £2 1967
L/ m
LOANS
Form L9-50m-9,'60(B3610s4)444
REG|ONAL LIBRARY FACILITY
A 000143300 2
MUSIC
BP,/.,iY
/Y,L/
,