(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "The Groton Averys, Christopher and James"

Google 



This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project 

to make the world's books discoverable online. 

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject 

to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books 

are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. 

Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the 

publisher to a library and finally to you. 

Usage guidelines 

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the 
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to 
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. 
We also ask that you: 

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for 
personal, non-commercial purposes. 

+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine 
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the 
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. 

+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find 
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. 

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just 
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other 
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of 
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner 
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe. 

About Google Book Search 

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers 
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web 

at |http: //books .google .com/I 



r><^^ 



^'' 



THE 



GROTON AVERYS 



Christopher and James, 



THE FOUNDERS OF THE FAMILY. 



BY ELROY M. AVERY. 



1893 



Not Published. 



0. 



t 



THE GROTON AVERYS. 



CIIRISTOPIIKR. 

CHRISTOPHER AVERY, a weaver, was born in England 
about 1590. There are several traditions with regard to his im- 
migration to the new world. One is that he came from Salisbury, 
Wilts County, I^ngland, in the ** Arbella," with John Winthrop, 
and landed at Salem, Mass., June 12, 1630. Another tradition is 
that he came over with the younger Winthrop, in 1631, and that, 
on the voyage, the subsequent governor of Connecticut formed a 
strong and life-long attachment for Christopher Avery's young 
son, James. The shipping list of the *' Arbella" is not known to 
be in existence, although it may form a part of the voluminous, 
unpublished and unexamined archives of the British admiralty 
office relating to that period. If it is ever found it will probably 
determine this doubt. 

The family is very old in Cornwall, and the Christopher Avery 
• branch may have originated there. In 13 10, a Thomas Avery was 
found at Hodmin, Cornwall; in 1543, John, Thomas, David, and 
Richard Avery were assessed in Cornwall ; in 1605, Thomas Avery 
was mayor of Tintagel; and in 1679, mention was made of Christo- 
pher Avery's meadow at Tintagel. The late Mr. John D. Bald" 
win, of Worcester, Mass., was of the opinion that Christopher 
Avery's ancestors came originally from Cornwall. A Christopher 
Avery buried his w'ife, Mary, at Salisbury, in 1591, and they 
may possibly have been the parents of our Christopher. See 
Appendix A. 



r»()8'^f>2 



The Grotoii A-, 



■rys. 



ThcTc is iilso soino t]in.-stiLHi as to where Christopher Avery 
first took up his abode un this side of the \v;iter. Mr. liuldwiii 
beheved that lie lived in Hoston for several years and went ti> 
Ghtiiccster about 1644, while Mr. Harris, of Grotoii. tliinks that 
it is probable that he went directly to the fishin^j establishment 
at Cape Ami and settled on '"the farms" adjacent, and that he 
had a close connection with the Rev. Mr. Hliiiman and his 
■■ Welsh Colony." 




liathe in ihe bree/cs of (air Cape Ami— 



Kesi 



I tllcl 



Fold. 



Loved bv the sachems and sc|ii;iv 
Itome whi-re Ihe while magnolias bloom, 
Sweel with the baybcrry's thaslc perfume. 
IliigKeJ by ihe wood'i and kis«.'H by the :ea— 
Where is (he Eden like to thee ? ■' 

But it is asserted that Avery, the layman, did not well a^^ree 
with HIinman, the minister at Gloucester, that he was presented 
at court fctr speaking - scoffinfjly of him," that he <iid not accotn- 
pany the minister tc) New Lond(ni. as most of his flock did, and 
that he did not join his son there until HIinman had j^'oiie back 
to Knj^land. 

Christopher Avery was selectman at Cdoucester in 1646, 1652 
and 1654. At a court in Salem he took the freeman's oath, June 
2y. 1652 ; was chosen and sworn clerk of the band, cnn.stable. and 
clerk of the market. His wife did not come with him to this 
country, and, in 1654, he was relieved of a fine imjio.sud for livinj^^ 
iipart from her, as the following shows: 



Christvphcr . 5 

From Records of Massachusetts^ vol. 7, /. J64 : 

"Oct. 19, 1654. — Christopher Auery bein^ fined 20 li, at 
Ipswich Court for Iivin<^ from his wife, vppon his peticon to this 
Court, bein<^ ai^cd & poore, & havinge vsed meanes to p cure his 
wife hither, his fine is remitted." 

From Records of Massachusetts^ vol, 4, part /, /. 210 : 

"In ansr to the peticon of Christopher Awerey, the Court, 
vnderstandin<; the peticoner is very poore and aged, having noth- 
ing to pay, and that he hath vsed his indeavor to have his wife 
brought ouer to him, judge meete to remitt his fine and that his 
peticon is receaved freely." 

In 1658, he sold his lands at Gloucester and removed to Bos- 
ton, where, on the 1 8th of March, 1658-9, he purchased a home 
in what is now the business centre of Boston. The following is 
a copy of the deed : 

From Suffolk Deeds, Book j, p. 214 : 

To all christian people to whom these presents shall Come 
John Samuell of Boston marrjner and Luce his wife send Greet- 
ing Know yee that the sajd John Samuell and luce his wife for 
and in Consideration of forty pounds part whereof in hand pajd 
the residue secured to be pajd Haue Given Graunted bargained 
Sold enfeoffed and Confirmed and by these presents doe giue 
graunt bargaine sell en feoff e and Confirme vnto Christopher Avery 
of the same boston weaver The one moyty or halfe part of theire 
dwelling house scittuate and being in Boston aforesajd videljzt 
the North end thereof conteyning one Under roome a chamber 
ouer the same and a vane roofe ouer that with a sellar vnder the 
sajd Roome according as is marked and layd out by Leftennant 
Richard Cooke and Peter Oliuer with all the Chimneys belonging 
to the North end of sajd house so farre as by the sajd Cooke 
and Oliuer is marked out with so much of the Leantoo as 
extends to the sajd dividing marke of the sajd chimneys with 
the Ground at the sajd North end of the sajd house also the 
Ground on both sides the sajd house to extend so farre vpon a 
square from the sajd North Knd as the sajd dividing marke of 
the sajd chimneys which Ground was likewise lajd out by the 
sajd Cooke & olliuer and which ground so marked out as afore- 
sajd for the sajd Avery is bounded & fronts next the streetc west 
likewise bounded with the land of Mathew Coy north with the 
orchard of Henry Bridgeham east and with the residew or rest of 
the land belonging to the other halfe of the sajd house remayning 
in the hands and possession of them the sajd John Samuell and 
Luce his sajd wife South which sajd house with the appurten- 
ances they the sajd John Samuell and Luce his sajd wife pur- 
chased of Captaine James Johnson as in the deede by the sajd 



6 The Croton Avery s, 

Johnson vnto them scaled bearing date the thirtjeth day of Jan- 
uary in the yeare of our Lord one thousand sixe hundred fiffty 
sixe appeareth. To Haue and to hold all and eucry parte of the 
sajd bargained prmisses so bounded Sett out & marked by the 
sajd Left Richard Cooke and Peter Oliuer as aforesajd vnto the 
sajd Christopher Avery his heires and Assignes To the only prop- 
per vse & behoofe of the sajd Christopher Avery his heires and 
Assignes for euer And the sajd Jno Samuell and Luce his sajd 
wife Doe by thes^* presents Couenant and Graunt vnto the sajd 
Christopher Avery his heires execcutors Administrators and 
Assignes that they the sajd John Samuell and luce his wife are 
lawfully sized of & in the sajd premisses & euery parte thereof 
with the Appurtenances thereof in theire owne right to theire 
owne vse of a Good estate of Inhaeritance in fee simple and are 
the true & propper owners thereof and haue in themselves full 
power good right & lawfull Authority to graunt bargaine & sell 
conveigh & Assure the same vnto the sajd Christopher Auery 
his heires and Assignes in such manner & forme as before in 
these presents is mencioned & declared for any act or thing donne 
by them the sajd John Samuell and luce his wife or either of 
them and for warranty of the sajd bargained Premisses they 
ye sajd John Samuell and luce his wife Doe for themselves theire 
heires execcutors and Administrators further Couenant and 
graunt to and with the sajd Christopher Auery his heires and 
Assignes by these presents that the sajd bargained Premisses now 
be and at all time & times heereafter shall be Remayne Continew 
& Abide vnto the sajd Christopher Auery his heires and Assignes. 
freely Acquitted exhonnorated and discharged or otherwise from 
time to tjme and at all times hereafter well and Sufficyently 
Saued Defended and kept harmelesse of and from all & all manner 
of former bargaines Sales guifts Graunts and ffeoffements Joinc- 
tures Dowers titles of Dower estates mortgages forfeitures seis- 
ures Judgments extents executions & all other Acts & Incom- 
brances whatsoeuer had made Donne acknowledged or Com- 
mitted by them the said John Samuell and Luce his sajd wife or 
either of them or any other person or persons clayming or having 
any title or Interest of in or to the sajd bargained premisses or 
any parte thereof or any of the appurtenances thereof by from or 
vnder them or either of them or the Assignes of them or either 
of them or donne or Comitted by theire or either of theire Assent 
means or procurement or had made Donne or Comitted or to be 
Donne or Comitted by any other person or persons whatsoeuer 
whereby the sajd Christopher Auery his heires or Assignes shall 
or may be lawfully evicted out of the possession or enjoyment 
thereof or any parte thereof as aforesajd : And further that they 
the sajd John Samuell and Luce his sajd wife and the heires of 
them or either of them at the Reasonable Request and at the 



Christopher. 7 

Costs and chardges in the law of the sajd Christopher Aucry his 
heires or Assignes shall and will performe and doc or Cause to be 
performed and donne any such further act or acts as they the 
sajd John Samuell and luce his sajd wife or the heires of them or 
either of them shall be therevnto Advised or required by him the 
sajd Christopher Auery his heires or assignes for a more full or 
perfecting conveying and Assuring the sajd Bargained Premisses 
and euery parte thereof according to the lawes of this Jurisdiccon 
In witnes whereof the sajd John Samuell and Luce his sajd wife 
haue heere vnto putt theire hands & scales the eighteenth day of 
march in the yeare of .our Lord one thousand Sixe hundred fiffty 
eight or fiffty-nine. 

mrke ^^ 
John Samuell & a scale 
Luce Samitetj. & a scale 
Signed Sealed and 
Deliuered in the pres- 
ence of 

Richard Cooke, 

Ita Attest Robt Howard not Pub^"«- 
This instrument aboue written was Acknowledged to be the act 
& deed of John Samuell & luce his wife the i8th of the first moneth 
1658 before me 

J NO. Lndecott Gounor 
Rntred & Recorded 22th march 1658 

p El)W Rawson Recorder 

The land thus sold for forty pounds sterling was a small lot 
about twenty-six by forty-six feet. It was located in what is now 
the centre of the post-office building, facing on Devonshire 
Street. The famous old spring, which gave the name to Spring 
Lane and which is now preserved under the post-office, was near. 
This Avery plot was a part of or at least adjoined the site of two 
notable resorts of later days, — the well-known restaurant whence 
first came the famous ** Julien soup," and the '' Stackpole House," 
not much less famous. The Winthrop estate was not far away, 
and near by, in after years, Henjamin I^>anklin was born. Chris- 
topher Avery did not long retain this property, for on the ** two 
and twentjeth day of march one thousand Sixe hundred Sixty & 
three," he sold the land to Ambrose Dew for forty pounds. There 
had evidently been no increase of value in the five years that he had 
held possession. After being owned by two or three different 
persons, it was bought by Mr. Stackpole about 1790. 

Christopher Avery now followed his son James to Connecti- 



8 The Grot on Avcrys, 

cut, and, Au<;ust S, 1665, purchased a house, orchard and lot of 
Koberl Burrows in New London. I fere he chiinied exemj)tion 
from watchini; and training on account of a^e, in June, 1667, and 
was made a freeman of the colony, October, 1669. Charles Hill, 
the town clerk, made this record of his decease : '* Christopher 
Avery's death, vide, near the death of Mother Brewster," but the 
date of her death does not appear. Minor, in his diary, however, 
records that Christoi)her Aver\' died March 12, 1^)79. 

According; to an affidavit in the probate court, he left an only 
son, James. 

JAMKS. 

CAPTAIN JAMES AVERV, the only child of Christopher 
and properly the founder of the family that we call the Groton 
Avcrys, was born in Enj^land about 1620. lie came to America 
with his father, and lived at Gloucester for several years. He 
married Joanna Greenslade, of Boston, November 10, 1643, as 
appears from the record at Gloucester. She received a letter of 
dismissal from the church at Boston to the one at Gloucester 
in 1644 : 

"17 of r mo. 1644. Our sister Joan (Ircenslade. now the wife of one James 
Averill had ji^ranted her by the Church's silence, letter, of recommendation to the Ch. 
at C.loster." 

Nothing is known of her ancestry. The only other trace of the 
Greenslade familv in America in the seventeenth century that I 
have found is a petitit)n with the followini^ heading: *' 1663. 
July 4, A Declaration of ye Townes of Scarborow & Tfalmouth 
Black Point & Casco to be Presented to ve Hon^ Court att 
York.'* This petition carries numerous signatures, including that 
of Thomas Greenslad. At that time, the province of Maine was 
claimed by the heirs of Sir Ferdinando Gorges and by the colony 
of Massachusetts Bay, the struggle for jurisdiction ending in 
favor of the Bay colony in 1677. A possible relationship between 
Thomas Greenslad and Joanna Greenslade is suggested by the 
fact that the first born son of the latter was named James (for 
the father) and that the second born was named Thomas. 

Miss Caulkins's *' History of New London," p. 67, says : 

** On the nineteenth of October, 1650, jjrants were made by the townsmen to ' Mr. 
lUynman. Obadiah IJruen, Ilujjhe C'aukin, 11 ujjhe Roberts, John Coile, Andrew Les- 
ter, James Averye, Robert I shell.' 



James. , 9 

'* These were all from (ilouccstcr, a town on the eastern coast of Massachusetts, 
situated upon the peninsuhi of Cajxi Aiin. Mr. Richard Hlinman had been the minis- 
ter of (jloucester for eij^ht years, and was now enyjajjed to become the minister of the 
I*ec|Uot plantation. 'I'he others were a party of his friends who purposed to move with 
him, and came on to make preparatory arranjjements." 

It appears that James Avery went back to Gloucester, .sold his 
possessions there tt) his father and, in 1651, returned to New 
London. In March of that year, '* the principal body of these 
eastern emigrants arrived. -h- * -Jt -jt * Early 

in 165 I, New Street, in the rear of the town i)lot, was opened for 
the acconimt)dation of the Cape Ann conii:)any. This position was 
designated as * bevond the brook and the ministry lot.* It was 
carved into house lots and took the name of Cape Ann Lane. 
The lots on this street were nine in number, of six acres each, 
extending; both sides of the narrow street from the alder swam]) 
in front to Cedar Swamp on the west. l^eL;innin^ at the lower 
end, HuL»h Calkins had the first lot by the Lyme road, or hi«fh- 
way to Nahantick, as it was then called, and next to him was his 
son-in-law, llu^li Roberts; then Coite, Lester, Avery, Allen, 
Meades, Hou^h, Isbell." These New Street home-lots were 
dreary and un in vitinL,^ Some of the new-comers became discour- 
aged and went away and *' e\en those who had the courai^e to 
settle down in this part of the plantation, soon abandoned the 
land to pastura<4e or waste and found other homesteads." 

The registry entitled '* l^irths in New Londt)n " bej^nns with 
the following record : 

*' Hannah, the dauj^htcr of James .\very, was l;urn li Oct., 1644. 
James, the son of do.- -15 I)et:. 1646. 
Mary, the daughter of do. — 19 I'cb. 1647." 

These three were born in Gloucester, and their births were 
there recorded : the transferred record *' is not asolitarx' instance 
of loose and inaccurate rejjistrv." The interval between the 
births of James and Mar\', as above rect)rded, was fourteen 
months instead of two months, as at first i^lance appears,— a 
result of the obserxance of the Julian calendar in those c'ays. 
The calendar-amendment act, an Ewi^lish statute of I75i,estab-. 
lished the first day of Jaiuiarv' as the bej^innin^ of each year 
(instead of Lady-day, March 25), adopted the Gregorian or *' new- 
style " in i)lace of the Julian or " old st\'le " calendar, and can- 
celled the then e'xistin;^ excess kA eleven days by making the 



lo Tliv Grot on Avery s. 

third clay of September, 1752, the fourteenth. Hence the double 
\vritin<^ of the year in dates falling in January, February and 
March, so frequently met with in the following century. The 
last date in the registry-record above quoted might be written, 19 
Feb., 1647 (O. S.), or 29 Feb., 1648 (N. S.), or 19 Feb., 1647-48. 

In addition to his grant of land, October 19, 1650, and of a 
town lot on Cape Ann Lane, early in 1651, James Avery soon 
received a grant of the ** Little Owl Meadow," " not far from the 
town plot on the North side of the Mill Ikook." But ideas 
grew and there was a quick thirsting after large domains. About 
1652, he was granted a farm in South Groton, where lands 
were especially desirable, as they might be cultivated 
immediately. He, however, continued to live with his family on 
his town lot for several years. Farly in 1653, he secured another 
farm, one of the '* Pocketannock grants," further up the river, in 
what is now the town of l^edyard. About 1656, he built "The 
Hive of the Averys, " at the head of Poquonnock Plain, in the 
present town of Groton, a mile and a half from the River 
Thames. In June, 1684, the old HI nman edifice at New Lon- 
don, ** the unadorned church and watch-tower of the wilderness," 
was sold to Captain Avery for six j:)ounds, with the condition 
that he should remove it in one month's time. According to 
tradition, the church was taken down and its materials carried 
acnxss the river and added to the house he had already built at Po- 
quonnock. \\\ spite of this analytic and synthetic process, the 
house seems to have retained some of its sacred character and, 
even a century later, '* the same timbers, the same boards, joy- 
fully resounded once more to the ancient but well remembered 
voices of exhortation and praise." The anticpie dwelling, of 
which we give a fme illustration, is still in good repair and is 
occupied and owned, as it has ever been, by an Avery family. 
With its charming situation, the old-time combination constitutes 
one of the most interesting and ])icturesque farm-houses in the coun- 
try. Here James Avery lived until he died. The present occu- 
pant (1893) is the (jroton town-clerk, Mr. James D. Aver\' (No. 
1623). 

James Avery seems to have taken, at once, an active part 
in private business and public affairs. On the twelfth of Octo- 
ber, 1667, he petitioned the general court as follows: 



James, 1 1 

*' The request of James Avery of New London to this Honored Assembly is, that 
whereas the C'ountry have putt me upon some publique imployment, :nd haue done 
what seruice I am capeable of, that this Assembly would please to grant me, as they 
have done to diverse others, a percell of land which belongs to the Country, soe much 
as theyshall think meet, where it may be found ; which I shall thankfully accept ; and 
ever pray for your prosperity." 

In May of the following year, the general court made the fol- 
lowing record : 

** Lieutenant James Auery hath likewise by this Court granted to him a Hundred 
Acres of land for a farme, in which there may not be aboue twenty acres of meadow." 

A like reward for public services was made by the colony in 
1675. 

He soon became active in military affairs and is generally 
spoken of by the title of Ensign, Lieutenant or Captain. 1 he 
region in which he had made his home was formerly the chief 
seat of the formidable Pcquot tribe that had been almost exter- 
minated by the English a few years before. The Pequot Fort, 
taken in 1637 by Captain John Mason, in command of the Con- 
necticut troops and their Mohegan and Narragansett allies, was 
on the Mystic River, on the eastern line of Groton. After the 
Pequot War, a few survivors of that once dreaded tribe still lived 
in the haunts of their fathers, with the Narragansetts on the 
east, and the Mohegans, under their sachem, Uncas, near by on 
the west. In 1657, the Narragansetts made a wild foray and 
Uncas fled from the blood and fire that marked their course. He 
took refuge in a fort and was besieged by his unrelenting foes. 
But just in time, " Lieutenant^ James Avery, Mr. Brewster, Rich- 
ard Haughton, Samuel Lothrop, and others well armed, suc- 
ceeded in throwing themselves into the fort ; and the Narragan- 
.setts, fearing to engage in a conflict with the English, broke up 
the siege and returned home." The legislature approved of the 
measures that had been taken for the protection of the faithful 
ally of the English. 

Great Britain proclaimed war with the States General in Feb- 
ruary, 1665, and, in June, America received tidings that the 
Dutch admiral, DeRuyter, had orders to visit New York with a 
large force. The northern colonies were alarmed at the approach 
of so formidable an enemy and began preparations for defence. 
The following item appears in the record of a session of the Con- 
necticut general court, held at Hartford, July 6, 1665 : 



12 The Grot on Avery s, 

** This Court haueing by his Majestie's order bene informed that DeRuiter is likely 
to assault his Majestie's Colonies in these parts of the world and that it is his royal! 
pleasure that his subiects here should put themselves in a posture of defence ag^aynst 
the comon adversary, In pursuance thereof, doe order that each plantation in this 
Colony should consider of some way for the discouery of the approach of the enemy : 
And that vpon the discovery of the enemy they presently giue notice thereof to ye 
Comittce appointed by the Court, who are to act therein according to the power com- 
itted to them by this Assembly." 

The committee in charge from Southerton to Guilford was 
" Maior Mason, Ens : Avery, Thomas Minor, Robt Chapman, or 
any three of them." " Which said Comittccs being mett in 
their respectiue h'mits are hereby impowred to order and appoint 
how and in what way the order established for aid and relief e in 
such cases may be effectually attended." In this same year (1665), 
the general court confirmed Ensign James Avery as ** lieutenant 
to ye Trainband at New London." 

In 1667, the Pequot remnant was transfered to a reservation, 
although, as the historian informs us, ^* Mr. Winthrop, Captain 
Denison, Captain James Avery and some other men of influence, 
dissented from these views and labored for the accommodation of 
the Pequots." The fair disi)osition and judicial temperament of 
Mr. Avery are here clearly shown — qualities that doubtless gave 
him much of the great influence that we know he possessed with 
the friendly Indians of that region. For several years, before 
and after this, the commissioners of the United Colonies referred 
almost everything relating to the Pequots to Messrs Denison, 
Stanton and Avery for adjustment, and the Connecticut general 
court records contain references, too numerous to mention in 
detail, of which the following (May 11, 1666) must suffice as 
examples : 

** Lt. Avery and James Morgan are appointed and recjuired by this Court to lay out 
the land for Coassatuck Indians according to ye determination of ye comittee ; and 
likewise to lay out the northern bounds of Stonington, and also ye land granted to 
Thomas Minor and John Gallop respectiuely.*' 

'* Robin Cussinamo is appointed Gouernor oucr ihe Pequots on this side Mistick 
Riuer, and Cushaunakim and Voiomatimo are appointed as Assistants to ye said Cus- 
sinemo in gouerneing the said Indians. And Lt. James Avery, Gary Latham and 
John Gallop are desired to assist by advice and counsell to these Gouernors as occasion 
or necessity may present." 

In 1678, the said commissioners granted Captain Avery five 
pounds ** for his good service in a.ssi.sting in the Government of 
the Pequots for sundry years past." See Plymouth Colony 
Records, Vol. 10. 



James. 13 

In 1668, he and Cary Latham were chosen by the town to set- 
tle the boundary line with the sachem Uncas. The ;^15 that 
secured the desired formal deed was paid by James Avery and 
two others, each of whom was indemnified by the town with 200 
acres of land. Captain Avery's services seem to have been often 
called for by the town and by individuals in the settling of such 
controversies. 

In June, 1672, the general court ordered that Captain John 
Winthrop should be the *' chcife millitary officer" for the county 
of New London, and Lieutenant James Avery, his second. 

In 1673, danger was apprehended from the Dutch, and each 
county was ordered to prepare for defence. New London Coun- 
ty was to add a hundred ** dragoones " to her train-bands, and for 
** such iorces as shall be called out of that county, James Avery 
[was] appoynted Captain." 

New England's long continued freedom from the horrors of 
Indian war was abruptly ended in 1675. The name of King 
Philip became a terror to the English settlers from Connecticut to 
Casco Bay. In the summer months, Massachusetts suffered 
untold agony and, in October, the general court at Hartford 
practically put Connecticut under martial law. 

" P'orasiiiucli as this Court, by reason of intelligence (both from our freinds 
towards the Narrog^ansetts and allso from Major Andioss) of great combinations and 
threatenings of the Indiar.s against the lOnglish, and perticularly against the greatest 
part of this Colony, and that speedily to be put in execiilion, the late experience and 
motion of the enemie seeming to suite such a designe, haue seen cause to call backe 
their present forces unto Hartford to be improued as farther occasion may call for ; It 
is therefore hereby ordered, that each county doe speedily rayse out of their several! 
townes in their respective countyes, sixty souldiers, well fiited with hors armes and 
ammunition, as dragoones, who shall be imbodyed for motion in their severall respec- 
tiue countyes for the defence of the Colony against any suddf n assault of the enemie. 
And because of the difficulty and danger of moueing ouer the riuer at Saybrooke, this 
Court orders Savbrooke and Kenilworth to fall in with New Haven, as part thereof in 
this undertakeing. The proportioning of each plantation and all other things necessary 
for the well ordering of the severall companycs is left to the ciuill authority in each 
county to order as they shall judg most conduceable to the end afoarsayd ; and that 
they be ready for the releife of each other upon notice. aS any exigence may call for. 
And because there are the Moheags and Pecjuols dwelling amongst those fower townes 
of New London County, it is ordered that Captain James Auery take the command of 
forty Knglish from the three townes of New London, Stoneington and Lyme, to be 
rayscd together with such of the Pequo»s as he likes, and Captain John Mason shall 
take twenty Knglish from Norwich with the Moheags ; each party to quarter and 
lye where they may be of best vse for the end afoarsaid, and to joyne together as there 
may be any occasion or exigence, vpon notice from Major John Winthrop; 
they to appoynt sqch inferior officers as they shall thinke most meet." 



14 The Grot on Averys, 

At a meeting of the council of the colony in the following Feb- 
ruary, ** there was order to Capt. Avery, Capt. Denison and Lnt. 
Minor to rayse some forces to surpriz or destroy the enemie ; as 
more at large by the letter on file may appeare." From said let- 
ter, I clip the following sentence : 

** The Council, considering the difficulty of collecting any con- 
siderable body of the enlisted soldiers from the several townes, for 
an immediate march against the enemy, order that Captains 
Avery and Denison, and Lieut. Minor, should forthwith gather 
as many men as possible, from the three nearest towns (New 
London, Norwich and Stonington), and, taking with them the 
Mohegan and Pequot Indians, march against the enemy/' At a 
meeting of the council in the following month, it was written in 
the record that : 

** For the encouragement of such as shall goe forth volunteers against our Indian 
enemies in the Narrogancett Countrey and to prevent their gathering and setleing 
there, we have thought meet to declare, that whosoeuer shall imploy themselues in this 
seruice, whether Indians or English, and goe forth under the command of Capt. 
George Denison or Capt. James Avery or Lnt.Thomas Minor or Ens: Tho: Leffingwell, 
shall haue all such plunder as they shall seize, both of persons and corn or other estate, 
to be disspo5>ed by them in way of sale, so as they may best advantage themselues, 
provided Authority haue had the first tender of theire dispose of captiues, alloweing 
them the market price ; to be diuided amongst them, to the priuate souldiers, each 
man alike, and to the commanders so much a better part according as there is differ- 
ence in their wages : and all wounded men to be healed at the Country's charge." 

In the following August, *' the Councill agreed and ordered 
that the right and division of the captives be left to the decision 
and determination of Capt. John Mason, Capt. James Avery and 
Mr. Daniel Witherell, whoe are desired and impowered to diss- 
pose the said captiues, whither in hands of the Pequots, Moheags 
or Narangancetts, to such persons to whome of right they doc 
belong, according to the seuerall agreements as the clay- 
mers shall make their demands by." The question of the dis- 
position of booty again came up in the council and, in January, 
i676-*77, it was ordered that ** whateuer captiues or plunder shall ' 
be taken is to be tryed and condemned by a Court Marshall, that 
so no wrong may be done. The Court Marshall for New London 
County are appoynted to be Major Ed: Palmes, Capt. James 
Auery, Lnt. Samuel Mason and Lnt. Tho: Minor, or any three 
of them." 



James, 15 

The commissioners of the United Colonies of New England 
put a force of a thousand men under command of Governor Jos- 
iah Winslovv of Plymouth. In early winter, he was in the hostile 
country where a great battle was fought on Sunday, December 
ig, 1675. The Narrangansett fort was in what is South Kings- 
ton, R. I. It included \\w^ or six acres of dry ground, was sur- 
rounded ^by a swamp and defended by palisades and felled trees. 
The only entrance was by abridge made by a felled tree and com- 
manded by a block house. Within, were not fewer than 3,500 
warriors. The fight was desperate, for, on either side, it was a 
clear case of conquer or die. Victory was for the English. It is 
said that 700 Indians were killed that day and that of their 
wounded, 300 died. The power of the Narragansett tribe was 
broken. In this fight, the Pequot allies were commanded by 
Captain James Avery : Captain John Gallop, who commanded 
the Mohegans, was slain. 

The Narragansett fight enraged the Indians and made them 
desperate. The English plantations were in greater danger than 
before. In the following February, began *' that series of forays 
into the Indian territory, which, issuing at short intervals from 
New London County and led by those noted Ind an fighters, 
Denison and Avery, contributed in no small degree to the favor- 
able result." In Uie third of these excursions, the chief surviv- 
ing sachem of the Narragansetts, Canonchet, the son of Mianto- 
nomo, was captured — '* one of the great exploits of the war." 
The particulars of his capture and execution may be found in 
Hubbard's '* Indian Wars," ])p. 165-9, '^"^ i" TrumbulTs '* History 
of Connecticut," 1. 343-5. 

Captain Avery was equally prominent in the civil matters of 
the town and colony. He was chosen townsman, (/. c\, select- 
man,) in 1660 and held that office twenty years. What seems to 
have been one t)f his earliest acts in this official capacity shows a 
laudable desire to preserve the public documents and is thus 
recorded : 

** Feb. 6. 1660.— For the sellling, perfecting and fairly recording of all records, for 
the town's use and good of after posterity, wee agreed that there shall be a towne 
booke, with an Alphabet in it, wherein ail acts passed, orders or agreements, shall 
hereafter be fairly recorded, whether past or lo come, for the effecting hereof, we agree 
that all the old bookes of records shall be searched into for what is material concerning 
the public good, to be drawn out into a booke provided and paid for by the Recorder, 
who shall have C«/. paid him out of the town rate for every act, law or order recorded." 



1 6 The Grot on Avery s. 

This is signed by the townsmen, Obadiah Bruen (who was 
recorder), Hugh Calkin, James Rogers, James Avery and William 
Nichols. Unfortunately, the full measure of the advantages 
which these wise townsmen intended to confer upon " after pos- 
terity'* was made scant by the performance. 

For the next few years, the records contain frequent references 
to James Avery in connection with such matters as the collection 
of tax-rates, arbitrations like that between ** Goodman Packer 
and the Indians'', the killing of wolves, for which he claimed the 
bounty of twenty shillings each, the laying out of the king's high- 
ways, the adjustment of the bounds between New London and 
Saybrook (which adjustment proved to be unsatisfactory to his 
fellow-citizens), the naming of a day for the cutting of wood for 
the minister, etc. In February, i665-'66, it was ** Voted by ye 
Towne that Leifft. Avery and James Morgan have power to agree 
with any person that hath a serviceable horse to be emploicd in 
fetching up Mr. Bradstreet and what agreement they make the 
towne to allowe and make good the same." The next year, and 
as a consequence of this carte blanche, Goodman Prentice 
received ten shillings for the use of his horse, and Goodman Royce 
fifteen shillings " for ye minister's dyet." On June i, 1666, it 
was ** Voted by a Vnanimous consent that Mr. Bradstreet is 
accepted to ye worke of ye ministry amongst us, and that he have 
80 lb. pr yeare to encourage him in the worke, to be gathered by 
way of rate." The town also voted to build a girt house " 36 
foote in length, and 25 in breadth and 13 studd betwixt ye joynts 
with a stack of stone chimneys in the midst," all at a cost of a 
hundred pounds, with an extra appropriation to ** paye ye masons 
for building a stone chimney and glaze ye house windowes." 
These records give us an interesting peep into the old New 
England town-meeting and throw an instructive side light on the 
characters of our fathers. 

Originally, the Connecticut general court not only enacted the 
laws of the colony, but administered them, criminally as well as 
civilly. As it was difficult to try all of these cases at Hartford, 
and in answer to a petition from New London, the general court 
** doe order for ye present that there shall be an assistant and 3 
commissioners in that Town who shall have full power to issue 
small causes, and ye punishing small grimes," Among the first 



James, 1 7 

commissioners appointed for this particular court at New Lon- 
don, was Captain James Avery. The appointment was conferred 
upon him by the general court in 1663. His office as commis- 
sioner was much like that of a justice of the peace. The first 
court record of '* Judge" Avery that I have found is dated May 
31, 1664; **Dcputy-governor Mason and Messrs. Talcott, Bruen 
and Avery on the bench.*' In 1666, the county of New London 
was constituted with its county court. Of this county court, 
James Avery was for many years one of the commissioners. 
Before this court came actions for small debts and complaints of 
evil-speaking and disorderly conduct. Wills were proved and 
marriages performed the same as in the higher courts. A few of 
the examples cited by Miss Caulkins may serve to illustrate the 
manners and customs of those days: 

•* June 30, 1664. Mrs. Houghton summons Mrs. Skill inger before the commission- 
ers to answer for abusing her daughter in the meeting house ;*we not finding legal 
proofs hereof, judge it meet that Mrs. Houghton tutor her daughter better and not 
occasion dislurbance by any unmeet carriage to her betters hereafter, and this being 
the first time, we enforce no further." 

Another case was against ** a person belonging to Seabrook for uttering contumelious 
speeches against his Majesty when in liquor; to be whipt immediately at New London 
and a quarter of a year hence at Seabrook; Mr. Chapman 10 see it done." 

*' 1667. Goodwife Willey presented for not attending public worship and bringing 
her children thither; fined 5^. 

"(ieorge Tongue and wife were solemnly reprimanded for their many offences 
against God and man and each other. On their submission and promise of reforma- 
tion, and engaging to keep up the solemn duty of prayer and the service of God in the 
family, they were released by paying a fine of ^^3. 

** John Lewis and Sarah Chapman presented for sitting together on the Lord*s Day 
under an apple tree in Goodman Chapman's orchard." 

" J ^73 James Rogers, Jr., for sailing in a vessel on the Lords day, fined 20J'. 

*' Edward Stallion for sailing his vessel from New London to Norwich on the Sab- 
bath. 40J.'* 

*'Sept. , 1674. Complaint entered against Stonington for want of convenient high- 
ways to the meeting-house. The court ordered that there shall be four principal 
highways according as they shall agree among themselves to the four angles, and one also 
to the landing place, to be stated by James Avery and James Morgan within 4 months." 

That the county court had admiralty powers appears from the 
followinf^ : 

" 1680. Thomas Dymond vs. barque Providence, stranded on F'isher's Island, for 
salvage of goods." 

" 1682. New London was presented for not having a grammar-school; fined £\o\ 
also for not having an English school for reading andj writing, j^s." 



1 8 The Grot on Avery $, 

There were numerous presentations of James Rogers for pro- 
fanation of the Sabbath and kindred offenses. He had extensive 
hinds and a greater interest in the trade of the port than any 
other person in the place. He and his family became dissenters 
from the established church and allied themselves to the Sabba- 
tarians or Seventh-day Haptists of Rhode Island. After 1677, his 
son, John Rogers, drew off from the Sabbatarians, assumed the 
ministerial offices of preaching and baptizing and organized a 
new sect called the Rogerenes. Miss Caulkins says that " a great 
and predominant trait of the founder of the sect, and of his 
immediate followers, was their determination to be persecuted. 
They were aggressive, and never better pleased than when, by 
shaking the pillars, they had brought down the edifice upon their 
own heads. They esteemed it a matter of duty, not only to suf- 
fer fines, distrainment, degradation, imprisonment and felonious 
penalties with jxitience, but to obtrude themselves upon the law, 
and challenge its power, and in fact to persecute others, by inter- 
rupting their worship, and vehemently denouncing what they 
esteemed sacred." I hese offences were promptly met by penal- 
ties. ** Fines were many times repeated and the estates of the 
offenders melted under the seizures of the constables as snow 
melts before the sun." ** It is probable that all penalties would 
have been silently dropped had they not kept up the aggressive 
system of testifying, as it was called ; that is, presenting them- 
selves in the religious assemblies of their neighbors to utter their 
testimony against the worship. John Rogers and the elder sister 
wx^re the principal offenders, they often carrying their work into 
meeting and interrupting the service with exclamations and pro- 
tests against what was said or done." The foregoing is intended 
simply to illuminate the following from the records of the county 
court : 

"April 14, 1685. Judges upon the bench, Fitch, Avery and Wetherell. John 
Rogers, James Rogers. Jr.. Samuel Ueebec, Jr. , and Joanna Way, are complained of 
for profaning (iod's holy day bv servile work, and are grown to that height of impitty 
as to come at several times into the town to re-bapiize several persons; and when God's 
people were met together on the Lord's day to worship ( Jod, several of ihem came and 
made great disturbance, behaving themselves in such a frantic manner as if possessed 
with a diabolical spirit, so affrighting and amazing that several women swooned and 
fainted away. John Rogers to be whipped fifteen lashes, and for unlawfully re-bap- 
tizing to pay £^. The others to be whipped." 



James. 19 

The Hon. Richard A. Wheeler, for many years the judge of 
probate at Stonington, Conn., says (Novembr 10, 1888): ** Mr. 
Avery held the office of commissioner for a good many years, 
and, judging from his position in civil and military life, he must 
have been a man of marked abilities, fitted for the exigencies of 
the times in which he lived.'' Miss Caulkins says that "after 
1666, for fifteen or twenty years, the commissioners (justices) for 
New London were almost invariably Messrs. Avery, Wetherell 
and Palmes.*' (History of New London, p. 180.) 

Captain James Avery was twelve times elected to the general 
court from 1658 to 1680. Groton w^as set off from New London 
as a separate town in 1705. In 1871, Judge Wheeler published a 
list of representatives from Groton from its organization, at the 
end of which occur these words : " It is w^orthy of note that out of 
the 545 representatives of the town of Groton, 104 have borne the 
name of Avery and all were descendants of Captain James Avery." 

There was then a close union between church and state, each 
being part of the other. The Congregational church was fully 
'* established," wholly *' orthodox," and the only one recognized 
by law. The minister's salary was raised by public tax and a few 
of the old rate-lists for this purpose are still preserved. In that 
for 1664, the names of 105 property holders appear. The name 
of ** John Winthrop, Squire," heads the list. He was then a non- 
resident ; his property was set down at ;^i85. The estate of 
James Rogers is set dow^n at ^^^548 — nearly double that of any 
other tax-payer. The next highest are John Pickett, ^^^299, los.;. 
James Morgan, ^^252 ; Robert Burrows, ;^246 ; James Avery, 
;^236 ; and Gary Latham, £2\y. At that time, land was hardly 
taken into account in the estimate of the value of a man's estate. 

James Avery was prominent in matters relating to the church, 
and the references to him in such connection are numerous. For 
example, in Februar>% i6jy-ys, when it was resolved in town- 
meeting to build a new meeting-house to take the place of the 
out-grown Blinman house, the building-committee consisted of 
Captain Avery and two others. In 1683, he was a member of a 
committee of which Major John Winthrop was chairman, to send 
a letter to the Rev. Mr. Mather and the Rev. Samuel Willard, at 
Boston, for advice concerning a successor for the Rev. Mr. Brad- 
street, deceased. The church record kept by the Rev. Mr. Brad- 



20 The Grot on Avery s. 

street, begins October 5, 1670, the day of his ordination. It 

begins with the following list : 

••THE MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH. 
Lieutenant James Avery and wife. 
Thomas Miner and wife. 
James Morgan, senior, and wife," 

and eighteen others. Thus we see that the wife, Joanna, was 
living in the latter part of 1670; the Rev. John Avery says that 
she was living in 1693. The date of her death is not known. 
She was the mother of all his children. 

About 1655, a certain Abigail, surname unknown, was married to 
Samuel, the son of William Checseboro, the founder of Stoning- 
ton. Their daughter, Abigail Cheescboro, married John, the son 
of Captain James Avery. Samuel Cheeseboro was buried July 
31, 1673. and on June 15, 1675, his widow was married to Mr. 
Joshua Holmes. Mr. Holmes died in 1694, and on July 4, 1698, 
his widow was married to the widowed Captain James Avery. 
Captain James Avery died April 18, 1700,; his widow was living 
as late as 1714. His four sons married and had twenty daughters. 
The four sons had thirty-two sons. At least twenty-five of the 
grandsons became heads of families, and there is nothing in the 
records to show that the other seven were not married. These 
twenty-five grandsons, of whose families we have the records, had 
one hundred and two sons. Of these, at least eighty-five might 
have married, and it is known that sixty-nine of them did marry. 

In studying the records of those days, the careful student is 
strongly impressed with the fact that Captain James Avery was 
a very remarkable man. Living as he did in stirring times, he 
Avas a leader among strong men, enjoying their confidence and 
respect because he deserved them. Especially is it to be noted 
that, although the state then took cognizance of affairs which 
we now call private and interfered in the details of family life 
and personal relations in a way that would not be tolerated now, 
he was never censured or ** presented " for any shortcoming or al- 
leged dereliction of duty or propriety. Eminent in all the relations 
of life, his descendants look upon him with pride and affection 
as one sans pair ct sans rcproclu\