UNIVERSITY] OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS
COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE
AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA
GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN
CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS
BY
WOODBRIDGE METCALF
BULLETIN No. 380
November, 1924
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRINTING OFFICE
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA
1924
EUCALYPTUS GROVE ON CAMPUS
Blue Gum, 37 years old, under optimum conditions.
GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA
PLANTATIONS
By WOODBRIDGE METCALF
CONTENTS
PAGE
Historical 4
Blue Gum (E. globulus) 7
A Yield Table for Blue Gum 10
Red Gum (E. rostrata) 15
Gray Gum {E. tereticornis) 18
Sugar Gum (E. corynocalyx = E . cladocalyx) 21
Miscellaneous Species 25
Manna Gum (E. viminalis) 25
Red Ironbark (E. sideroxylon) 27
White Ironbark (E. leucoxylori) 28
Red or Forest Mahogany (E. resiniferc) 29
Sydney Blue Gum or Flooded Gum (E. saligna) 29
Swamp Mahogany (E. botryoides) 29
Karri (E. diversicolor) 30
Messmate Stringybark (E. obliqua) 30
Utilization :
Fuel 39
Charcoal 41
Insulator pins 41
Lumber 42
Miscellaneous uses 43
Eucalyptus oil 44
Notes on other species 45
Summary 48
Appendix:
I. Method of taking field measurements 49
Calculation of volume (table A) 51
II. Site classification — E. globulus 52
III. Raising eucalyptus from seed 54
Sowing the seed 54
Transplanting 56
Planting 56
Cultivation 57
Spacing 57
Cost of planting 57
Protection of plantations 58
4 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
Trees of the genus Eucalyptus were introduced into California
about the year 1860 and since that time have been so extensively used
in plantations, windbreaks, and ornamental plantings, that they have
become one of the most conspicuous features of the California land-
scape. The introduction of the trees into the state has been variously
attributed to a Mr. Walker of San Francisco, Bishop William Taylor
Fig. 1. Fig. 2.
Fig. 1. — A Blue Gum grove 23 years old near Stony Point, Sonoma County.
The trees average over 10 inches d.b.h., and over 100 feet in height. An example
of good growth of this species on sandy loam soil in the coast region.
Fig. 2. — A Blue Gum grove 20 years old on sandy land known locally as
Dow's Prairie near McKinleyville, Humboldt County. The spacing is 12 X 12
feet and the openness of the crown cover has favored the natural reproduction
of native conifers including Douglas Fir, Grand Fir, Western Hemlock, and
Bishop Pine.
of the Methodist Church, Nurseryman Nolan of Alameda, and others.
Up to the present there seems to be no definite historical record as to
just who did bring the first seeds to California, but the names of
Kllwood Cooper of Santa Barbara, T. P. Lukens of Pasadena, and
Abbott Kinney of Venice, are prominent among those who did experi-
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 5
mental planting and urged the extensive use of these trees throughout
the state. In later years F. C. Havens of Oakland, Wm. H. Brintnall
of Los Angeles and W. D. Patterson of Arden, are among those who
made experimental plantings with a number of species which supple-
ment the experimental work of the University of California and the
United States Forest Service.
Undoubtedly the first seeds brought into California were of the
Blue Gum, Eucalyptus globulus, and the early tests with this species
showed it to be so thoroughly at home under the new conditions, and
so rapid in its growth, that most of the planting was confined to this
tree. This fact seems rather strange as this species has never been
considered of much commercial value in either Tasmania or Victoria
where it is native, and where mature trees of much larger dimensions
are found than any grown thus far under California conditions. The
first trees planted were usually set out singly or in narrow belts, and
their rapidity of growth gave rise to many exaggerated statements as
to the probable financial returns from plantations. Well meaning but
over-enthusiastic persons made estimates of growth of plantations by
assuming that each tree planted therein would grow as rapidly as
trees in the open under optimum soil, moisture, and light conditions —
forgetting entirely the influences exerted by different types of soil
and climate, the percentage of loss in established plantations, and the
slowing up in rate of growth because of competition between trees
growing under crowded plantation conditions.
The period 1900-10 was characterized by very great interest in
Eucalyptus planting which resulted in the formation of a number of
stock companies on a "share" or "acre" basis for the growing and
setting out of large areas of trees. The enthusiasm for Eucalyptus
planting and the statements made during this period were based on the
over-enthusiastic estimates of growth referred to above and a general
feeling that because of the very rapid cutting of the hardwoods of
the Mississippi Valley, Eucalyptus timber would command very large
prices within a comparatively short time. The U. S. Forest Service,
the California State Forester, and the University of California Agri-
cultural Experiment Station urged the necessity for caution in apply-
ing maximum yield figures to plantations growing under untried con-
ditions, on the basis of the very slender fund of experimental data
then available. In 1908 and later each of the above mentioned organi-
zations issued one or more bulletins giving conservative figures as soon
as these could be compiled. This assisted materially in checking the
over-enthusiastic tide of investment and speculation, but did not take
effect until a very large total acreage had been planted. In all there
6
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
are probably between forty and fifty thousand acres in California
which are, or have been, planted with Eucalyptus. During, and before
this period, the U. S. Forest Service and the University of California
Agricultural Experiment Station had been carrying on experimental
work in Eucalyptus planting; the former in favored localities of the
Angeles and Santa Barbara National Forests, and the latter at the
Fig. 3. Fig. 4.
Fig. 3. — Blue Gums, 7% years old growing on bottom land near Lakeside,
San Diego County. The trees average 4.8 inches d.b.h. and 52 feet in height.
Blue Gum in southern California or interior valleys requires adequate amounts
of soil moisture for good development. The upland portion of this plantation
showed many dead and scrubby trees from lack of moisture.
Fig. 4. — Looking upward through the crowns of 35-year-old Blue Gum trees
on bottom land at Berkeley, Alameda County. The spacing here is approxi-
mately 7 X 14 feet after thinning. Eucalyptus trees have relatively thin crowns
and do not make a dense shade.
Chico and Santa Monica Forestry Stations. It soon became apparent,
however, that results obtained in these restricted localities would be
lacking in applicability to the state as a whole, because not truly repre-
sentative of the wide range of soil, and climatic conditions, under which
Eucalyptus trees were being planted.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 7
In 1912 officials of the United States Forest Service, realizing the
need for more comprehensive experimental data, and recognizing the
opportunity offered by the large number of groves which had recently
been planted, undertook to make a study of growth in a number of
them. Mr. J. A. Mitchell, who was later in charge of the Feather
River Experiment Station, began the work on this project that year
by taking sample plot measurements in twenty-five representative
plantations. In 1916, on request of the Forest Service, the continua-
tion of this study was taken over by the Forestry Division of the
University of California; it being recognized that practically all
National Forest land is unsuited to the growing of Eucalyptus because
of adverse climatic conditions. In May, 1916, Mr. Mitchell and the
writer remeasured the sample plots previously established, and selected
and measured several others in addition. (For methods used in col-
lecting field data, see appendix I.) Practically all of these first plots
were confined to groves of Blue Gum, Eucalyptus globulus, but since
that time the study has been extended to include many other species
growing under as diversified conditions as could be found. Reference
to the accompanying tables will show a considerable number of species
represented, but most of them are found in California only as indi-
vidual trees or single rows or groups in experimental plantings. Prac-
tically all of the plantation areas now consist of trees of one or more
of the following four species :
Blue Gum, Eucalyptus globulus.
Gray Gum, Eucalyptus tereticornis.
Red Gum, Eucalyptus rostrata.
Sugar Gum, Eucalyptus corynocalyx (cladocalyx)
The approximate percentage of each of these species to the total
area in plantations is roughly estimated as follows: Blue Gum, 80%,
principally in the coast region but also present in other sections ; Red
and Gray Gums 15%, chiefly in the Sacramento and San Joaquin
valleys and the interior valleys of southern California; Sugar Gum
4%, mostly confined to southern California because it is not frost
hardy; other species 1%.
Blue Gum (Eucalyptus globulus)
The blue Gum is widely distributed throughout Tasmania and
Victoria on the lower slopes of the hills, but is usually not found in
pure stands. Scattered individuals also occur in the southern moun-
tain sections of New South Wales. In its native habitat it grows
rapidly and reaches great size (250 feet in height). Practically all
8
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — EXPERIMENT STATION
of the timber cut in Australia is virgin growth, probably several hun-
dred years old. Small differences are noted by Dr. J. H. Maiden and
other writers on Australian trees, between the Tasmanian and Vic-
torian trees of this species.* The wood cut from Australian trees is
used somewhat for wagon stock, and other heavy work but as it is diffi-
cult to dry and very subject to warping and checking, it is not used
for building and is not thought much of for timber.
Fig. 5. Fig. 6.
Fig. 5. — These stately Blue Gum trees at Newark, Alameda County, are 40
years old. The species is one of the finest for highway and windbreak planting
in California valleys.
Fig. 6. — This view in a 10-year-old plantation of Blue Gum on sand dune
soil near Monterey, illustrates the large number of fail places and the encroach-
ment of grass and brush into the plantation. On poor, dry soil, Blue Gum
assumes a spreading, stunted form even in the coast counties where climatic
conditions are suitable.
In the settled portions of California, the Blue Gum is now one of
the most conspicuous features of the landscape, being found almost
everywhere in groves, windbreaks, along highways or in lawns and
parks (fig. 5). In fact, it is so common everywhere that it typifies
See page 42.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 9
California to a host of people who are unfamiliar with the Redwood,
Sugar Pine, or others of her splendid native forest trees.
The Blue Gum may easily be distinguished from all other species
of Eucalyptus by its smooth olive-green trunks from which the bark is
shed annually in long shred-like vertical strips ; its bright blue juvenile
foliage with the leaves borne opposite in pairs on twigs which are often
fluted so as to appear four-angled in cross section; and its bright
bluish, warty, four-angled buds which after shedding the flat-conical
caps, develop into large yellowish white flowers. These appear on the
trees in great profusion and are an important source of honey. The
mature leaves are alternate in arrangement, very coarse in texture,
and are borne on dark reddish twigs from which they hang suspended
like miniature sickles. The flat topped, button-like fruits are about
three-quarters of an inch in diameter and bear tiny shiny black seeds,
smaller than the head of a common pin. Flowers and fruits are some-
times borne on sprouts only two or three years old, and the ripened
fruits can usually be found in great quantities under trees of ten years
or more in age. The Blue Gum is usually an erect tree with a single
stem which often shows a corkscrew-like tendency to twist in its
upward growth. Where seedlings have been injured by frost, rodents,
or light ground fires, two or more stems may develop. The proportion
of such trees is shown in column 7 of table 1 as an index of such
unfavorable influences.
Table 1 gives a summary of the measurements in sixty-seven repre-
sentative groves of Blue Gum distributed from Humboldt to San
Diego counties and representing a wide variety of soil conditions. The
position of each grove in a given county is fixed by reference to the
nearest town and a brief statement of soil conditions is given in the
final column. The present number of trees per acre can be determined
from columns 5, 6 and 7, while the diameter, height and volume of
the average single tree in each grove is given in columns 8, 9 and 10.
The volumes per acre, both total and mean annual, are given both in
solid cubic feet and in cords, both figures including bark. The con-
verting factor (90 cu. ft. = 1 cord) was carefully checked and found
to be substantially correct for trees of moderate size including a 10
per cent allowance for shrinkage in drying of the wood after piling.
A careful study of Table 1 brings out many interesting facts. Those
groves which have greatly exceeded the mean annual growth of approx-
imately three cords per acre, are found growing on lands of good
quality but rather open texture, where the soil moisture is adequate.
The best growth seems to have been made in groves where at least a
7% by iy2 foot spacing was used (fig. 1) . The results of overcrowding
10
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
o
CQ
03
/a
oi cd j _j .;
s a „,• a a a
a a all- a a a § § a a
° ° ° aa" °° °^?^?° °
>>>>>>§§o>>>> >>!> 1p >> >> • • • • >>>>>> -
c3o3c3^,^^c3c3c3_^_^c3c3o3o3o3c3o3o3c3o3c3o3c3o3c3c3c3o3o3o3o3o3;r7<7T?o3o3o3a3r^rdsT'
-u -w -(j
03 03 o3
Cdcdcd
^ aaaao o aaaa
13 cq cq "oq In O O 03 "02 155 "to
aaaaa-2- aaaa^a^
o3o3o3o3o3S3rto3o3o3HdMi
J? .2.2.2 .2 S S°0 O O as g^
TTT O O ' O g.S
>>>>>>>) >>— ' — >>>>>, >>— ' P «-
o3
d
« £ o3
a. 2 k
* & «J
a> M a
LOcDOOCDO t^ lO 00 Tt< t*h O CO t^ CM iO Oi CM Ci O <-H 00 O O CM l> 00 00 IN CM CD lO lO b- N
^C^i^O^Q0t^^C^rt<O00'^C0^O^^O^CaTfHTt<e0O^^C0O(Nt^O5Tt<i-iTtiiOt^C0Tf(t^i--(C0
iO^^i-hcOCOCDCOt^t-h.
icM^CMCMcMCOCO^CMCN|CMCMCMCMCO'-Ii-iCOCOC0-*COiOCMi-hCM©CO00'-h
>0O^>0Oa50000^^CDt~C0T-(O^00CMCM00c0C>0^t^CN^>-lC0CMOOC»^CO^C0^CM'— lOOCDO
OOOOt^03C^Tt<OTtiTtiC^CftCDC^05C^OOC^^t^iOO'HC^OOOOOrf<Tj<t^a2COOOTiOOO(NiOi-iTt<COCO'-0
t^OOCC CO CO CO >0 Tt< i-h i-i i-h CO CM i-h (M CO CM r-i CM CM (M CM i-h h CO i-h i-i CM CO CO CO ■* tJ< (M i-h CM CO t~- i-h
o
CO
Si*
55
to
Eh
W
p
<
Eh
o
M
o
En
o
p
N<D030^00CO'*0'OfOH'<JHOOlN050iiOCOOOO)NXO^^'OMOOHONNr-(0'*^cOTl'0
t^OTC»t^r^CO^i-HC^CT*i-HrHCX>C^!Ni-iCMLOOCOCOCO'-HCOCMCO^OCOa>C^i-HC^
CO CM CM MMNOi^'HN'HNcN'HiHMiOcDN'HHiHi-iiHiHMHiHN'tMiO'OOON'H CO CO i-h
r^^CX3Tt<01>00'-iTti010COiOC»OCNOiOOO^'^CDCO^r^^t^^OOO^CN(NOCDOCNI-*0305
OCOOSi-HCOi-HOTCMOO^COOiOC<)05r^COOO^TjHcNCOTf<©t^'-HTt<Oi-Hi-H©cOi-H^i-HC)O^CNOcX3T^
M!0''iNMMCONNN050iOCOOOO)ONO^>nONO'*'*OMffl^MNO(NOOOOOHNMM
CO CM CM MMCOOCOiHHiHNNr-IHC-HOCON'HrtHHHHIN T-(CNTtH(Mxt<»Ct>i-H'-H CO iO i-h
bC
d
cd
M
o3
-
CD
OiO^HOSOOiMt^cNi
IO 00 t> CM
i©i-HOOr^OOOCOCMTt<CN^Tt<CMCOTtHCM^COCO©00©©^OOOt^OO''tfCOCO©C5
o .
> 3
iOcD-^CM'-iO5CD^Ht>00O5i— i^^tii-<eNlCOOO^^CMCMi-H(NCM^O^Tt<COcOTt<C)OTHt^COCMi-H©iOTjHCM
H rHD) i-H CM i— I
M CD
■£«£
w
(»COCOOOC5CNOOCNlNMCOCNNOcOOQOOiHSOC)CDOCO'*OCOCDMiOCON'HQOOOOC<IN^OC3
»OiO^Tt<CDcDCXDro^uOi0^iOLOCOCO^CDOOTt<TtiTtlCO^CO^CO^^^t^OcDcDcDr)H'*CO'-iiOCDTf<
d
c
Q"
iCl^COO^CX>OXcN,^cNCNiO'OiO»-Hr^cD'-HCOOOOCNOOCN,*Tt<CO»001XOt^cDcDTf<cNN.rt<XTt*
CDCDLO'OOOt^OlOlt^OOOO-^iO'O'^iOcDO'— iCDiO'^'^iOiCt^OOt^CDiOCO'Or^iOCD'O'D^CNIcO'O'D
3
CQ
CO
0) — <
—< a 03
-s-ea
2 ■" cu
Q a «
lOHCOO^^OOOOiOOOOOCOCT) i-h iO l> O0COO0 00 **i >o o ©
OMNOOOOOOOOhOOOhhOOOOOONMOOONWOOOOOOhOOOOhOMN
-2 d
CQ »
0^^>OC>5CNlCOO(NTt<COCOTt<TtiCOcNIOO',*i005t><NO'0^iC) <MiOO<NcD00COTtii-i01-*t^cNcD
COCDXCOCN^O>-iOOI^t^cDcDTt<^^0^^^05Ca2t^OOO-*OCDt^CNIOOCDCOiD01COCOTt<cOiOO
OOcOOCO-^COt^r^b- cDt^0500cDt^t^l>cOt^0100CnoOI>t^OCOC»0500000000cDiOOOTtfcOCOCO
V
3 s S ^
aa
H"S c3
OOOOiOOOCOCOWOOOOOONOOOffiOOONiOiONNOOOOOOOOOOOOOINO
00 CO 0000 tJh 00 COCO 00 CNCNf^t^OOCO 00 00 0000 00 aOOOCOH(Tj(OON 0000 00 0000 i-h 1-HOO 0000 0000 rt< 00
CDOcDcDOcDlOiCCDt^t---t^r^COl^cOCDCOCOcDCDcDI^iOiCCOCO'-HCOCOCDCDCDCNCNcDCDCDCDOOt^CD
to t;
t^t^f^t^OC^^OCX)Tj<OCOCOt^^cOCOcDCOCOt^t>^CDCDCXiC^CDt^OCOCX)C\I^HiOOOt^'tiC000005
»— I »— t t— I i— i CM i-H i— ( i— I CM i-h i— I i— I i— I i— I
S3
CD
o o o .
TjTjTJ 4)
rt O O
CD
a
o o^ oooooooo
vvuu d d d d d d
T3rdrdrdcdcDCDCDCDCDCD
~£ > > > > -O T3 T) T3 T3 73
tridddddddddd
ogcflS aj? a a a a a a a a a oooooooaioo
O c3 d O O^ OOOOOOOO
d d
CD CD
CD CD
ddd0303$s3ejeJeJe3"S-e
ooQpcu^^-^^j+j+jdd
lll^3llllllll^l'ooggogg'ggggggo^ggg6u66uoJJi
d
3
o
o
o o o o o o
bC bfi b£ bfi b£i bfl
CD CD CD CU CD CD
o o o o o o
ooooooooooooooo
aacaaaaaaaaaaaa
oi »3 ot oi |o 1q 15 |o 1q ja lo !o lo !o |o io x> -D jo
JS^iJiJOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ,.,
CDCDCDCD „.'>>'>>'*>^> >*>■« .Ti .ti ~
^gjjgjgJjOTeoeoeoojtncoajcoojcoojcoOTMcDCDCDflJCDfjQdd
a.s.s cd cd cd d d d d '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 "3 '3 fc fc fc fc feij^^i;
QQQQQQMMbB^^^^^j^^^^.j^^^^^^^^^^^^-gfqpqeqqq
ddddddrta3ccio)0)o)oidddddddddddddddooooodddd
rtcScac3oJcSt"±?i,C>'->!-><->rtc3(Sc3cac3rtC!3c3e3<Sc3s3e3e3i--(i-- ihhh cj d S (S
•/.' '/.' v.' h f /. D QOi^Jh^hJeQCQCgWGQcy3C0MCQCQCQCQCQa?CQi<i^^^>^GQCQCQCQ
f2 jh c3 c3 c3
cu cd"0 T3T3
O 2 03 c3 d
03 o3 "— J -2 73
8JZ!
a
03 03J3
^<MCO^'OCDt^t^COC^O>OO^C^COCOCOCOCOTt<iOCOt^OOO>O^HiNCOCO-f'f>0>OCD^00050'-HtM
HHHrtHHHrtHrtHHHHrtNNtNCNNNNNCNNNCNINMMn
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 11
o
co
S
o
—
o
CD CD CD CD CD CD
a bo be a a a
OT373 o o o
,2,72, 2 ^
co tn t-, co co cd*co'G~J2
Q) O 0) O C O
,3. J2 .O .D. .O -Q
O O O O O O
73 73 73 73 73 73
o » m >.
.O.D.O.-4?
o o o a
737373 rf
SSS
O O O en
+J -kJ -^ oj)
O O 0^3
sass
c3 c3 c3 03
_o _o _o o
73 73 "CO
C G g g
t. ., ri ~
CO 02 02 CO
22 %
CO CO — H
sss
cd cd O
OOJ
4) QJ ^
> >-S
cd cd O
t-.fc.73
00«!
09
CD
a
. o
G OT3
^ g ©' -^ .^ 7» O
1,0 occg?
CD
a
o
oj
c3 ^3 a5 a5 cd'
m-'GGSJn^^^cDcDOcrS
,° g ago .2 .>? >> a 75 75^ -35 >?*-2
coOQUcocoOO<^<1cQcoOOco
G 5
>73 73
03 G G
■3 cd cd
Ococo
oj
3
£~
c — .
C P
M
CO
-3
J-,
cd
O
U
gd
t*
-u"
0)
«4-l
-,
•
3
o
CMI-~LOXCN»-OXXCiTf<
CMt^O»Ot>r^Ti<XiOX
OOOhhhCNOhN
ClC5CDCMiOt^"*CiCOcO
OScOX'^'OOCNN'^iO
rH iHr-liHCN 1-1 CM
O CM b- OOTJfi-icNNOM COCMcDCOCiiO
HMOl^ lO rH t}h CD O CD CO O CM iO i-i CM i> ■* tJ< O t~- CM iO O r-i 05
• o G
■-I iO iO g ^O^'OOCNHOcOCNCOrHiHCNCOfNCNCNi-i'^NiHOO
10 co co MGc^'-°l0'';f'r':il03:|cocoi^-HcocMt^co>--iaiO'--it^t^io
OSiO^^iOOOOLOXTttCN^OHOCJTjiOrHOO^rtHfflOO
H^O ^ ^HTt< rH i-l IO CM CO NCOINHNHT*HHM
CO
if
o
pq
3
Q
CO
-a
u
CD
O
o
O
eJ
i_
4a
CD
<4-l
a
3
o
CO>0
(NiHCOCNON'I'rHCNCN
<MO<M
~r
CMCM ^I'^iO'jUDWmrtMCOONiO ■* iO 0> O IO
rocDt^-^'-oior^cO'^Tf*
ffliOMWOiiHCOCCX
i-nOONCO^i'C'OON
00NO OHMNiOO^HOliOiOrtHNHCNNcOCOXMHOO
co ■<# -u _, o cmi-i oo-*iro>-ii-i(roTtixt^rHrtcc>coi-H05
o Z i-l i-H ,-<
X CM O ^ g^MONNOOiOOaOHMOOl5"OOT(lMiOO
co co co goMoxnHrHMncooNoeioiN^HCBcoNN
t^ co -* o^NN^xcoHiOrtrtOOOco^iOTjfcNHcxox
CO"* b- i-i i—i CM tjh CO i-h i-H CM CO t> CO O i-l CD CM i-h X
G
CD
be
cd
fc«
CD
>
o .
> a
•^t^t^t^XiOCOCOiOCO
CMi-Hi-HCOCOCOOOCOi-i
CO CM MOOl CO CDXXCO
C MuOrt CMOlOlcMcM'-HCOcOcM'tii-iO'^O'-iClCO-^Oi-H'-irti
i iO t> iO
CM
0>-i-*COT}<cMOOt>'*-*cMiOcDG:cMa5COC01>COCO
CO iOh r_l^H^c^ i-^,
Mo
x^'-'XCMt^r^cicO'-i
eococo ■*■*-* cm i-H-^co
i-H CM -^ i-H
CO "O COCO
O^H'*eOU5CT>C35t^Tj*l-<.cMC35COOSCOcOCM'<*i-iT+ieOOS
i-HCOCM-*iOCO'-HCMt>Tt<"OCM-*'*X'OXTfHOiOCOt>
O t> l> CO i-l CO CM CD X CD OifOlH IO OCM CO t^ X 05 COX CM t^ ■* O CM X X X t^- l> ^ CM X
iO'*'*nOCOiOCMCM'0'^ "OCDCOCO CMOi-i^0^cM'-iC5CDiO>Ol>J>c3505>OiOcJt^cOO
»-i CM i-l rH rt
>
h
3
CO
CD
CD — •
— a co
COiO^Ol^i-il^-X i-iCO COCO
0«NCHN0001ii lOCOO
l-H i-H CM
iCCOOiOTj*COiOOOOOO -r-i-iOCO XCMiO
NiOOOHXniiOOOcOOO»iCHO^*HO
0-*TtH(M
^G
M =
Co
_, -w
CO m
COCNNXOXOHM i*it^CM
OOC CONNCiOOCO HiOCCO
t^t^t^CDt^Xi-OCMiOCO IO3C0CO
^i#i*XNNNOMhOO CO iO X Tf( CO
COiHrfcOiOOJOifMXXiOOOOOrtXcNCCON
COiCCOtroCNCDXXiO^XO CM ■* I-- t? rji c»
§feG^
& a
OCOCOCOCOCOOOCOO oooo
XCO COCOCO CO CD CO CO X X X X i-<
CO TJH ^ Tf< Tj< Tt< CM CM i* CD CO CO CO O
Nib-
OO^tOcOOCOmcOOOrfiXcDOOLOOMOOifl
XM^COMHMOOrtOtMOiOMCOXCOOXM
cDtDrJdJ^CNrffCOCOMiOiOiOOX-iOcDCOOOcDi*
•3 "m"
co ^
c3 -u {^.
COXXfflaONNN P 3<MI>X^H
>*> Or-i CM
CO
CNNCOfflOOl^COOOiHi
CO 1-1 CM CM 1— 1 1—1 1
icMCMlOcOCMi— iiOiOOi— I
irtrtCOMijirtrtHrtH
:T3-d .
OjCOcDCDCDCDCDCDg
*0 G £ 'o "o "o "qj 'o CD 3
CD.X.XcDCDCDCDCDCDCD
o o
o o
c3 c3 c^
t- - 1h -
3 3 3.2
CD CD CD_
:T3
a
.."Grt <D
o3 c3 <D_J
c3 o3 0) S
OOPQco
s
T3 .
G o3 *
coPat
G >
^-G
G h^H
O o
coS
OOO
bd o o o
03 G G G
i- " r; n
03 pq .« .^ ,1-
TO -^>
o tn G G G
H,° c3 c3 c3
<3 fecococo
o o
o o
CO CO
0
:.
fl
a
sd
Bj
bH
tn
Mh^
G
fl
ad
T'.
XJ
■J.
o
i£
MrG
G >
;3 c3
«« o
3 o3
u
ad
PQ
G ed
05 "S
CD G
rs- c3
feco
G M
O G
S3
C
3
O
O
o
-3
I
5
ai co co co co co co
OOOOOOO
OOOOOOO
id
c3 c3 c3 c3 c3 c3
;3c3c3c3c3c4e3o3fc- u u u u
O
<<o
— ^- — ■— ■— ~ ~
GGGGGGGG
OOOOOOOcd
ooooooo>
3 3 3 3
-^ -*j -^ -*J
C G G G
CD CD CD CD
>>>>
T3"3
i-i -3 CD CD
-3 5 g g
c3 c3
T3 73 "3
, O G G G
2ZH G c3 03 cd
— 1 ~-< fj CO CO CO
O O nHH
s °
O c3 cd
od 08 09
iS CD CD
_ W t- >-
O CD CD
C cj*«
co-t? G G
CD G O O
CD
o
cO"*'Ocor^xooi-icM
cococococococo-<ct<Tj<T^
cd cS^3 cSXl
CM CO CO ■* lOiCcDNNXOOHCNmrtl^TtiiOCONXfflOTHM
"# -# "tf tcK ^^^Tf^^TjUOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiCiOiOcOCOcO
X
CD
>
O
M
CO
CD
M
o3
t-
CD
>
73
G
O
o
ed
u
o
>
03
G
(-. CD
CD CO
■* 2
-t-5 cd
. 3 °
(-1 ^rt
o3 o Cd
3+^3
MXI-^
cd"3
-^ -i
CD O U
at- co
°<*-. CD
m O m
G
d1
O CD
co _jj3
-3 O o
M-5 CD
43
G o3
.3 o •
CD
CD
' 03
co a
CD CO
03 CD
fe a
>T3
cd CD
«^ G
^•5- CD'S
cd cd>o^a p,
03 r- OB (V)
Sc§.Sg
G CD c " >
. cd C3 o
'>'Eco^ 03
10 .rr cd 73 a
G-3
G
O CD_>,
bC CD CD
S 03 c cd3
1-§§gg
CD Jl 73 CD
o73 *> 00
g- S CO CD
£ O » CD >
cd u CD -5 o
CD ? JO £■ K
co cd^ -t> o
.„+a cd ,2
S'Sfi'Ss
03 CD — CD *-
co " c-°
.. CD. 3 3 CD
g.G,G O J
12
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
are shown in groves Nos. 9, 39 and 40, while the growth in No. 31
was made in spite of a 5 by 5 spacing because of the rich silt soil,
and a superabundance of soil moisture. In every case where the mean
annual growth approaches or exceeds 5 cords per acre, the land is of
good agricultural value and the water table close enough to the sur-
face to insure an almost continuous supply. The growth on sandy
Fig. 7. Fig. 8.
Fig. 7. — This grove near Chittenden, San Benito County, shows Blue Gums
three and four years old. Both ages were seriously affected by the dry sum-
mers of 1916 and 1917. During years of excessive drought, the establishment
of plantations is difficult.
Fig. 8. — Blue Gums used to prevent the washing of arroyo banks near East
Whittier, Los Angeles County. While stopping erosion, they are growing rapidly
into valuable fuel wood.
mesa lands of poor quality is well indicated by groves Nos. 11-21,
inclusive (figs. 2 and 6), where the mean annual growth exceeded four
cords per acre in only one grove. Likewise slow mean annual growth
is recorded in groves Nos. 31-41 on the shallow, gravelly adobe slopes
of the Berkeley and Livermore hills. The influence of competition
by redwood sprout growth is shown in No. 53 (fig. 9). The abnormally
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 13
high rate of growth in the King City grove No. 62 resulted from a
mixed planting in which the Blue Gum far outstripped the other
species in rapidity of growth and had unusual space for development.
What are probably the two finest groves of this species in the state are
both in Alameda County ; one on the University of California campus
at Berkeley (No. 46, see frontispiece and fig. 4), the other on the
Patterson Ranch near Arden. Both of these groves are growing on
bottomland soil of good quality, and have been thinned at intervals
so as to give the best trees room for individual development. The
Patterson grove was not included in the table as it was impossible to
secure exact information as to its age. It is of great interest, however
as an example of mixed planting. The Eucalyptus trees were spaced
24 by 24 feet, the intervening spaces at 8-foot intervals being occupied
temporarily by Lombardy poplars. This species in spite of its rapid
growth was able to persist in the stand for only about 15 to 20 years,
after which the trees were quickly overtopped and killed out by the
Eucalyptus. The resulting stand of Blue Gum is exceptionally fine
because of the large size and perfect development of the individual
trees.
Ten of the sixty-seven groves have been measured twice and in
each case the remeasurement figures are given in Table 1 on the line
following the original measurement figures. This makes it possible
to compare the two sets of figures directly in order to give an indica-
tion of the periodic growth. It will be noted that in one or two cases
the average diameter or height at the time of the second measurement
is less than the previous one by a slight amount. This is explained
by the death or removal of several of the larger trees from the measured
rows.
For method of taking field measurements see appendix I.
A Yield Table for Blue Gum.
On the basis of the measurements of the 67 groves shown in Table 1
it has seemed desirable to derive a tentative yield table which will give
the approximate volume production of Blue Gum plantations at
different ages on sites of good, medium and poor quality. The data
were arranged according to the height method (see appendix II for
details) and the final yield figures are given in Table 2.
All of the groves classified as Site I are growing on deep bottom-
land soil of good agricultural quality, with the water table near the
surface of the ground for a considerable part of each year. Such
sites should therefore be considered of too high quality to be used for
growing Eucalyptus trees and eventually all groves on this type of
land will be cleared and devoted to the growing of agricultural crops.
14
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
An example may be cited in the case of the C. B. Turton grove in
Orange County (No. 7) which, although making very rapid growth,
is being clear cut in 1923 in order that the land may be devoted to the
raising of walnuts. Adjacent land in bearing walnut trees is said to
be worth about $1,000 per acre.
TABLE 2
Yield of Eucalyptus Globulus on Different Sites
Volume in solid cubic feet, including bark
Age, years
Site I
Site II
Site III
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
300
1,050
2,150
4,400
6,100
7,450
8,550
9,600
10,500
11,450
100
600
1,350
2,400
3,400
4,350
5,150
5,900
6,500
7,100
0
250
750
1,400
2,050
2,550
2,900
3,250
3,500
3,800
To convert to standard cords (4'x4'x8') divide above figures by 90.
The growth in plantations classified as Site II is slower than in
those of Site I because of poor soil, as in the case of the Los Berros
Mesa groves in San Luis Obispo County ; deficient moisture, as in the
case of groves in inland valleys ; or other unfavorable factors. Many
of these soils would grow fair to good agricultural crops under irriga-
tion, and where water can be developed as in the Santa Fe Railway
plantation area in San Diego County, the Eucalypts are forced to give
way to more valuable crops.
The Site III groves are usually on land too steep, too infertile, too
arid, or exposed to too severe winds to be valuable for agriculture.
These and the Site II groves on which irrigation is not feasible, are
probably the only sites which will be permanently devoted to growing
Eucalyptus trees. At some time in the future it may be desirable to
draw up a new yield table from which all strictly agricultural areas
will be omitted, but it is felt that the above figures are adequate for
the present and the immediate future. Planting of Eucalyptus will
undoubtedly be continued and extended on many strictly agricultural
soils to utilize small, odd-shaped corners of the ranch ; steep creek
banks or other slopes; (fig. 8) or in long narrow shelterbelts which
will furnish protection from hot, drying winds. The Site I figures
given above will be a good index of the volume growth possible under
such conditions.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 15
Red Gum (Eucalyptus rostrata)
Next to Blue Gum the Red Gum (Eucalyptus rostrata) has been
used most extensively in California plantations. It is somewhat more
frost resistant than the Blue Gum and has generally been used on
sites believed to be too cold for the latter. It is also able to withstand
Fig. 9. Fig. 10.
Fig. 9. — Blue Gum plantation on cut-over Redwood land along the Noyo
River, Mendocino County. At 10 years of age there are 340 surviving trees
per acre of which 34 per cent are small, stunted scrubs. The others average
5.1 inches d.b.h. and 52 feet in height, but the crown cover is so thin that they
have had no effect on Redwtood sprout reproduction.
Fig. 10. — Red Gum plantation 11 years old on good sandy loam soil near
Dunnigan, Yolo County. The crooked habit of growth of this species is well
shown.
more severe drought and alkali conditions than the Blue Gum but in
some places has been a practical failure where these two factors were
excessively severe. The typical Red Gum under California conditions
has leaves which are narrower and of finer texture than those of Blue
Gum. They are borne in gracefully drooping sprays of foliage; the
16
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
o
02
o3 c3
a a 1
^ ^ /->
o o ,2
g « s
§ 3 w
O O g
O O O
CM PL, O
03 g
£ §
T °
CD
>
L
bjO
>-.
O
O
a a
c3 c3
o o
CD
a
>>,2
c3 03
03 03 03 03 U *3 jrl
Cm o
cd a a)
bp o a
o
'3
03
So
03
CD
o
ft
a
C3OOQ000g>rig>S»C3
CD CD CD 53 T3 T3 T3 J3 J* J3 ,2 <D
<D
bfl
T3
0> c3 03
uo o o
T3 ^ -.
>> >>
03
O
>>
S3
03
O
-O
CD
•a
o3
Li •
m g
T3 O
CD
03
CD CD CD CT3
s jj a a a _.
o o o o o a
a ,D to co to o3
o3 o3
« S3
CD CD 03 £ t £ £
a a
oj 03
O O
03
a
03
o
>> >>
S3 S3
03 03
02 02
o3
CD
>
03
o
S3
' 03
« 2 *-
i> Ma
HMiO^ONOOtOCDNOO CCCD^NMmNMHaOJ^OO iO
^M©OMcD»ONOcOMO!^rtCOi(5cOiOiiiOHH^Ni(3(MOO
<N
K3TPtNO!M00cflH^rtNiOSNNO CN*O0 O S ■* N IN h to
NO)«3^"3COO)CDMOOO)rtiOiOTjli0^rj(OO^COil30iO
i-l CN CN i-h i-i i-l .-( CN CN
m
0<Ni-H'-HcNCMOOi-iOOO(NOOO'-iOOOiHi-lOOO<MCN
m
O
<3
i-
©
eo
&<
?=3
fe-
ci
eo w
! a
w
EH
- £
f §
o
i °
CD CD
S3 H
01«T)li(5N©COH(OHM«0©fflN(NK50cNOOiO
TjH O O
CO <N
i0NN0)OcO'<JiNHO'0i0iO>0'*^TH00
CN CN i-i H (N i-l
tj* N 00 00 N CO
TjJ iH 1-H ■<#
N00cOlMiOTjlN00eO00>OaO
^NNWCOHOOHiOffliOMN
^N00ON«3(D00OU3CCHO
CM i-( i-l (N CN i-h i-i
MoooomooHonHWooioto
UJHilffliCOOMOiOHMiOOOO
lONfC^Mrli^NHTliHOfO
m
o
m
m
O)
bO
C
CD
w>
o3
CD
>
O .
NOOJOOONHffl
NHCDWCNNGN
b- i-i O CO "#
(O 00 CD H if
f^ O (^
NO) o
in i-h t^ oo i-h
HtOffiiONONnM
i-lOOintNCNrtti-li-icNi-HiHt>OOOOOCNJcNCNi-lOi-iOOOCOO
bO CD
H N O) N 00
CO •* CO CO CO
T(<HHCOTjlCONO)NT)((NOOCON<DHTltO^COT)ICO
^COCOCONCOiilCOHlNNCOCOINNNlNMCOMMN
Kg
m'-S
. S3
Tj®r(ii0®M00HC0'0(0MNOhM<0HSrtNO')lfl00n(Ttl
^NN^OcO^iOO^^McSNNNUJio'iOiO^iONMHCfiN
CN
CO
CM
CO
CM
in
o
in
03
>
V
u
3
02
03
S3 03
O 12-
oi>oocoooom-*t>.cooo
co co o
OOIOHNHOOCOOOOO
32
HOONWCOHNHilOO^OO^
I-H i-l (M 1-1 H N
o i— i t>- in i— i
co i-i i-i o in
N N O)
° S3
S3 ^
02 w
oooooommcooocoinm
COOO^rHOi-iOOicNl^O
^OOOCOtMOOONHiOtBHOO^^NX'OOXOHHcCCJeOiOO
^(Nm^comm-^t^tv n^©«o^h^i»oo^>ocon
co
oo
CO
CO
m
T3
J> S3
l~
oooo-*ooomoooooooomomocNooococo o co
MXMX^XXXCOXNNXXHHXCCmMXNXMHOO 00 O
COCDCOCOIOCOCDCD^CONNCOCONCNCO^OO'^COCOCOCOINCOCO CO 00
<N CM i-h i-l i~t
a a
P
CD (h
bfl o3
NMrtHOlNMNOffi
i-t^03C00303CT>C3303
SCN \N
£
OJiiNCNcOMiOH
OJ
£ 13
a
fl fl o
.2 .2 -a
5 iS §
02 02 JJ
f» >>^
o3 03 S3
ooo!
g §
■a -a
tn C C3
S3 fl
o3 o3
02 02
oj
fl -5
03 ^2
■TJ «3
CO ^<
03 03
Pm hJ
oj oj
CO CO
2 2 <D
« Ph J
di rt^ H
>> s
03
fl
03
«
O
M M M M M M
a o «g ffl pS « fa s ^ ^ ^ p i
o
■ C3
-fl
O
S3
3
O
O
03
I55
CD
Li
03
"3
H
o o
fl ,2 £ £ £
g "o "o "o 'o
^ >H >H >H
o o
S3 S3
3 3
.-. 03 CD
lb
03 03
co co
O O
o o
DQ
C3 C3
03 03
02 02
| §-<<-<;QpqpqQ §
" S3 fl fl S3
^ o O O S ,j
<^<!i_lhHhJo20302O2
O fl
O
a
co
O
co
'3
a
03
a^UU^ 02 o o S £ S
S3
pq
03
bO
03
>-.
03
>
03
>
O
O
co
CN
i-h tN co co ■* m
03
co co i^
WOlOHNCOCO^iOcO
t- 00 Ol O) O i-h i-h
i-h rH I-H rH CN <N CN
CN
CN
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 17
slender twigs being bright red. The flowers and fruits are less than
one-fifth the size of those of the Blue Gum, are prominently stalked
and borne in umbel-like clusters of seven or more flowers to the cluster.
The flowers are borne in great profusion and are white or cream
colored. The buds are sharply pointed, and the caps which fall before
the flowers open are like tiny cornucopias, about % inch across the
open end. The fruits when ripe are almost globular in shape, about
%6 inch in diameter and look like clusters of small greenish brown shoe
buttons. The Red Gum and the following species, the Gray Gum, are
very similar in all of the above characteristics, and even in Australia it
is often difficult to tell the trees apart. Under these conditions it is
inevitable that there should have been some mixing in seed collecting
and varying percentages of both species are undoubtedly present in
groves planted for either. The Red Gum under California conditions
is almost invariably very crooked in its habit of growth, a large per-
centage of trees have forked tops which gives them a somewhat stunted
appearance even when they have attained considerable size. These
characteristics, together with the smooth, generally unmottled bark,
red twigs and drooping sprays of foliage may be used to distinguish
this species.
In Australia the Red Gum (preferably called River Red Gum or
Murray River Gum) is a large wide spreading tree with a short,
crooked trunk ; somewhat like an apple tree in general appearance, but
much larger and having a beautiful dome-shaped crown. It has a
very wide range, occurring in all of the states except Tasmania but
reaching its best development on the open bottomlands of the Murray
River and its tributaries between Victoria and New South Wales.
Here well grown mature trees are often 100 feet high, but it is not
considered a suitable tree for timber on account of its poor form
(fig. 10). The wood is a beautiful pinkish red color, very hard with a
much twisted and interlocked grain which makes it difficult to season,
but is very durable in the soil. The wood is highly valued for heavy
wagon wheel felloes and similar purposes, also for railway ties and
underground portions of buildings. Although quite ornamental it is
rarely used for furniture because of its hardness and the twisted grain.
It will be noted from Table 3 that the rapidity of growth of Red
Gum is less than half that of Blue Gum. This might be expected where
the tree has been planted under colder drier conditions, but it also
holds true where the two species are growing in adjacent plantations.
The Red Gum is not well suited to the conditions obtaining along the
coast where the Blue Gum is at its best, but has made its best growth
in the interior valley sections (Yolo and Stanislaus counties) and in
18 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
southern California. Because of its ability to withstand drought and
alkali this tree has often been planted under such severe conditions
that it had very little chance to make satisfactory growth. Hard pan
near the surface, as at Clay Station, Sacramento County, or excessive
amounts of alkali, as in the groves at Pixley, Tulare County, have
resulted in high percentage of failure in the plantations and scrubby
form of trees.
On the basis of the above measurements, no attempt has been made
to classify the groves of this species according to site quality or to
develop even a preliminary yield table. It will be noted that the mean
annual growth of even the best Red Gum groves averages only about
two cords per acre, and the maximum growth recorded, 2.8 cords per
acre per year, was made in a small grove on the University Farm at
Davis where soil conditions are optimum and the trees had good irri-
gation at intervals as a sewage reservoir is located within the planta-
tion. In Australia the River Red Gum is not a dry land tree, but
reaches its best development in open stands, on bottomland flats where
it is subject to frequent flooding. A grove near the Yolo Causeway
between Davis and Sacramento has been subject to winter flooding on
several occasions, but other conditions on that site have not been good
enough to make the grove even a moderate success. Several groves of
this species have been planted in the Imperial Valley where they have
persisted under the extreme heat conditions only because the planta-
tions have been flooded at about monthly intervals during the dry
season.
Gray Gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis)
The Gray Gum or Forest Red Gum as it is called in Australia, is
so closely related to the Red Gum as to be considered by many authori-
ties as a variety of that species. Extreme forms may be easily recog-
nized from the Red Gum by the mottled bark, broad leaves, heavier
fruits and the generally erect habit of growth ; but in many cases it is
practically impossible to tell which of the two trees predominates in a
given stand. The erect habit of growth has been taken as the most
reliable indication of Gray Gum although the other factors were also
used where possible.
The Gray Gum is evidently more susceptible to frost than either the
Blue or Red Gums, but it seems to stand heat and drought better than
any of the more commonly planted species (figs. 11 and 13). This is
well demonstrated in the plantations near Lakeside, San Diego County,
where groves of the four species are growing in closely adjacent blocks
on decomposed granite soil of very open texture. The low annual
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 19
rainfall, high summer temperatures, and coarse textured soil combine
to make the site one of extreme drought. All four species show the
effects of these conditions but the Gray Gum looks more thrifty and
shows a higher percentage of survival than the others. Sugar Gum is
next in order of thrift on this site, followed by Red and Blue Gums.
Fig. 11. — Trees in a 9-year-old plantation of Gray Gum growing on decom-
posed granite foothill land near Del Eosa, San Bernardino County. This species
shows up well under the extremely dry conditions of this site.
The last species is unable to persist here except in the gully bottoms
where the supply of soil moisture is higher than on the slopes or
ridges (fig. 3).
In Australia the Forest Red Gum is not as widely distributed as
Eucalyptus rostrata. It reaches 150 feet in height, has a much better
form and its wood, though similar to rostrata, is preferred because
straight grained.
20
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
p -2
w £
tjH r^ '-5
gel
HO §
o o
pa
CO
co
CO
CO
CO
1
©
co'
co'
a a a t
a rH a
O O CO t3 J5
o o> o
CO 0> CO M H
CO *""' CO
CD © © © ©' -2
R © *>
• • -u -u -—> hj -u • —
a
o cj •— ••-> -h t3 -a d
* -^ -a .
-2 o g ® «8
rH 2 a CO
^ co R
<~ • ■ j » s a
'o
+5
© «' & 9 S S S 5 S *
m a^oggggg^
+3'?2 © ^ re MbfibjObCbO0"
o
4a
-— 1
o
02
e3
Cfl
o3 co
03 >H bjtn ^r*!—,-^—.----—,
qa ^i-i - ca osTS'u'O'O'O'O
^g^fl^^ajdjcoaj©©
eg 5 oooooo
a
03
a
£ <S d
c3
g O q-j
grS^^^^aaaaaa
_>>««« a«o
O
O
° >> o
rt>i'3>i'5'3)KHSSSE
g "© ^^^a >>>,
* g B fi fl g B fl
JtJ Cg c3 c3 a d c3
O 02 02 02 Q 02 02
>1
>,
b^'C -9
Sx'CS > T3 > > O O O Q O O
-o
fl
cS
02
l-M
CO
O
a
3
Srfl £
T3
i—i
ID O O
CNOOi-HOJOOrHinOOCN-*
•* CO rH O T* lO
CO
UD
O
iQ
© CN O
t'jiooNNtD'jisoaa'ii
rt o « n a io io
©
©
flt3 £
a &o3
O
i—l
CN i-l r-t
000>-iOOOO'-lO_0
©
rH rH O © O O O
rH
©
Mean
grc
per
-— >
CD
CO CN O
ootoN^HHNooao 5o
CD •* O Tt< o 00 o
Tjl
©
t*-t
CO
toots
COCOt^iOOCOCOcOOOOO C-*
CS ffi CO © 00 •* lO
t*
00
3
0
i— I
CN i-H
^ a
H
1— I
co
m
t^ o
lO
i-i
o
io m io
(OtOOONNNWOOfflOOO
N H to M M * (O
■*
t>
<d co"
as
o
O
CD
CN CM i-l
-tfCOOOCNOiOCN-^OOOCO-*
N M O •* "J U3 H
©
rt«.
CO i-l r-l
CN i-H rH
rH
3 03
O >H
-»J
lO
CO CN »0
C000OOCNO^»ti.CDTt<Tt*05
h (M 05 O lO N O <f O O ■* ICI
CO CN O ■* 00 lO O
l>
t>-
> S
t*_l
■*
CN CN ©
N 00 CO 00 N 00 lO
ts.
©
"^ P<
3
o
IC
O H O)
TjiCOt^OOOOlCN-^GOOOCOCO
CO CN CO ■* rJH rH
•*
©
CN i-H
CN
T-l
• -u
o
loiotoosiooiontom
i-H © O ©
©
0)
"3"*.
CN
CN rt* ©
ifNHSNiOMtOO^iOM
■rjl CO rH 00 © lO CN
©
>g
i— (
b- CN ii
lOOi— ICNt— Ii— iOOi— i O O O
rH O © © © O ©
Tf
-u
00
"5b
-S.-*--
c
bO ai
to
b- oo >o
MMNUJHTliHtDOOiOtfiO
CO © t^ CO © © ©
lO
00
02
© «
CN
lO CO CO
Tj<CNCOrf<COCOCNCNCNCNCNCN
CO rH rH CN CN CN rH
H*
CN
©
rat-
w
es
14
w «
o>
CO
<tf
r-l CN 00
NNMON^ltD^OJiOOOO
© © © 00 00 © CO
co* CN
©
>
. fl
•tf
b- »D rJH
t^COCOiO-^TtlCNCOCOCOCOCN
CO CN CN CO CO CN CN
s ®
tH
*4-l
CO
01
CD
COOO MH(50MtOH(0
rH Is. CO 00 © rH
©
"3 °
CN
"3
3 a;
O -t-3
CO
O O O
Oi-HOOi-iOicOOCOOOCOt>
t^. CO •* CO © © lO
a00
©
©
>
02
Qm
1— 1 1— 1 T— 1 1—1
CN rH CN r-i r$
0)
a
^
"si S
a «
CO
CO CN CN
CO t^ Tf*
OOmOiOOOOOCNrfiiO
coocooi-ioo5t-r)0'^>oo
CD 00 M 00 lO CO "O
00 CO 00 00 to CO N
2 o
00
©
©
02 m
©
© I> b-
iOCNO)'<liiOtO00NN'<tiN
tn K5 it) ^i iO K3
0> CO
fl
lO
• "8 £
'3
3 O g <S
iO
>o o c
ooooot^r^oooooc
iO N O O N N C
»4-h <— ;
©
CO
CO 00 oc
OOOCNt^OOCOOOi-HrHi-Hr-
CO O 00 00 © © OC
^, OC
©
Ttl
•* CD CC
©COt^t^CSOCOCOCNCNCNCN
1-H CN r-l rH I-H 1—
Tj< © © © © © ©
j§ ©
©
00
a&
"a
eg
bO c3
NP* \?»
< rH
■>*
rH 1-H r-
HOiHMwtoiotooonoi
ts. CO CN © © © CC
O oc
00
i— 1 rH r-
i-H rH 1— 1 1— 1 rH 1-HrHrH
r-l
a
&
03
d
o
CO
T)
43
•— >
co
o>
■
0>
>
ii
c
bl
I >
b
c
9 bl
1 1
1
J Bl
a
E
01
a
(-
c
1
•a
o
^ fl.
03 _
*J r>
a
t
c
a
D bi
E
a
1 I
a
'a
3
cS
tf
c
0
s
c
PS
a
C
P.
ei
a
c
©
1
a
'C
a
X
T3 fl £
•rH tH -
-Q co --:
ai
i. a
^fl
"3 a
-a £
z
C
fl o c
3 > >
-0 g" fl CD C3 Ol J! ^ T! -Tj rH r-
^IBrMOOJrlQPPC
(TJ tH fcH i-H O C ~
kT co 0> CO to cd S
pt Ch PL, Ph H 02 C
1 -
O o:
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
d
h a
>»
■
rr
T) "C T) T
2
IS
©
bO
a
CO CO
:
O O o3 o3 o3 cc
s
d dC
O c
03
fl
O
U
>
a
a>
co co
03 C3 bO bfi
bo to a a a c
O) <D fcn fcn tn 1-
Eh © J^ 0J bD Ul r
f^TSTOTrJ CO C0--
\^ .r* .^H .r .r-> -rH r
. co eo m /-\ /-\ r;
08 a E h Q H >-
-U CO CO CO
«J bl
■a j
rJ C
9 0)
>
c
i
c
i-
a> o c
111
~"300©©-;H>;HCOCocoa
<
-f--rji-H')JlOO02020202O20:
fl > > > fl fl c
fl c
r.
i-h o c
<5 02 a
03 V"3 LT3 ^3 °3 03 o!
03 Ph Ph Ph 02 02 o:
03 oj
02 o:
© .
e 6
rH CN C\
o3 o3 o3
MiiiOcONNMOOaaOlC
rH CN CO CO -tf >C ©
© ts.
©
2*
T—
CN
O
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 21
The results of measurements of twenty groves of Gray Gum are
summarized in Table 4, in which it will be noted that the mean annual
growth of this species rarely exceeds 1% cords per acre, and the
average is less than one cord per acre per year. Groves numbered
6 and 17 in which maximum growth of 1.71 and 1.93 cords per acre
per year were recorded, are both growing on sandy loam soil of excel-
lent quality with better than average soil moisture conditions. Groves
2 and 2a in Solano County (fig. 12) have had exceedingly good care
including adequate early cultivation and recent thinning to remove the
Fig. 12. — A well kept grove of Gray Gum 11 years old growing on sandy
loam soil near Vacaville, Solano County. Inferior trees have been removed in
thinning operations and the brush is piled ready for burning.
poorer individuals, but the mean annual growth has only been at the
rate of about one cord per acre. It therefore seems unlikely that the
rate of growth of this species will ever greatly exceed one cord per
acre per year even on sites of better than average quality. It is recom-
mended for its ability to grow under extreme conditions of drought,
but it will not stand as much frost as either Blue or Red Gums. Grove
No. 16 in San Luis Obispo County, has been a complete failure because
of repeated injury by frost.
Sugar Gum (Eucalyptus corynocalyx — E. cladocalyx)
Sugar Gum trees may be easily recognized by their smooth yellowish
mottled trunks, the bark of which does not come off in vertical strips,
but is shed in small plate-like scales. The leaves are not sickle-shaped,
22
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
but are rather oval and blunt pointed. A prominent characteristic of
this species is the reddish young foliage which makes plantations of
these trees stand out clearly on the landscape. The flowers are borne
in clusters of ten or more on a stalk, and the fruits are about twice
the size of those of the Red Gum and rather barrel-shaped in outline.
These characteristics are so definite as to make this species easily
distinguished from any of the other commonly planted Eucalyptus.
Fig. 13. Fig. 14.
Fig. 13. — Twelve-year-old trees of Gray Gum (E. tereiicornis) at the right;
and Sugar Gum (E. corynocalyx) at the left, growing on the Bixby Eanch, Orange
County. The Sugar Gums were removed in 1920, after water became available,
and the land is now occupied by an irrigated lemon grove.
Fig. 14. — Sugar Gums lining this Santa Monica avenue are about 25 years
old. The tall mottled trunks and reddish upper foliage of this species make it
very desirable for street and highway planting in southern California.
The Sugar Gum is very drought resistant but is subject to injury
by frost. Therefore it is best suited to the climate of the southern part
of the state, and where planted north of Santa Barbara County, will
only survive in situations which, because of favorable air drainage, are
comparatively free from frost. A 20-aere plot of Sugar Gums on the
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 23
Brintnall property in San Luis Obispo County was finally plowed out
after the trees had been frozen down to the ground several times.
The groves at Arden, Alameda County, are growing in a sheltered
spot near the ranch buildings where the trees are protected by adjacent
plantations of Blue and Red Gums. A small grove of these trees is
growing on a south slope in Strawberry Canyon, Alameda County,
where the trees seem never to have been injured by frost. A few trees
at the Chico Forestry Station in Butte County, have been severely
frozen back on several occasions. In general, it may be said that the
cultivation of this species should not be attempted in the central or
Fig. 15. — A Sugar Gum plantation on the Murphy Ranch near East Whittier,
Los Angeles County. The Sugar Gum is very drought resistant but is easily
injured by frost. Avocado trees in foreground.
northern parts of the state. In South Australia it is considered one
of the most drought resistant species and capable of withstanding
adverse treatment. In southern California it is largely planted as a
highway and shade tree (fig. 14).
A summary of the growth measurements of seventeen Sugar Gum
plantations is given in Table 5 from which it will be noted that the
average rate of growth per year (1.22 cords) is about the same as that
of Red Gum and considerably in excess of the growth made by Gray
Gum. The very rapid growth made by the trees in grove No. 1, in
Alameda County, may be explained by the wide spacing (15 by 16
feet), excellent soil conditions and a succession of favorable warm
winters during the time that the trees were small enough to be subject
24
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
co
En
^
3
Pi
v.
P
*s»
M
s
<j
*n
W
i
IO
S
1
S3
&H
o
Oh
EH
ft
o
CO
3
s*
"T»
S-H
9
§
§
3
p
fcl
CQ
CD
CD
CD
a
a
a
o
o
_o
CO
Cfi
*3
CD
V
CD
, .
CD
. M
CD 73
M T"
CD
3 CD
(0
43
03
CD CD
m a
73 ^O
y slope,
slope.
co
S
03
43
'3
03
CD
caO
73
CD
a
_o
lope
idge
'o
CO.
43
o3
-u'
o3
a -2
a
_o
ID
0=1
>1
'C "m
>> >1
Ih
bfi
b£
73
"co
a
CO Ih
a a
«
«
* a §
c3 ra
tS
c3 o3
1 a
a "8
73
73
fl
03
o3 o3
O >)
>,
CD
CD
03
o
O O
B
s
S «8rt
^ C8
^
CJ
o cs
° 03
TO o
m
o
a
o
a
cc
03
O
o3
O
< — i
S 2 >>
O ~ S3,
— ' t» CD
>■ o
O
>)
_>> ^
j>. o
_2 a
>
_>
J-? ii?
13 a>
CO
"3
"as "as
"o >>
>, a
S
S
CO
"CD
13 13
>,
>
>, 73 >
> -S
X3
>
> >
> 73
73 O
o
o
>
>
> >
o3
a3
cj (3 h
03 ^
o
S3
03 c3
o3 C
0 S
t>
o
c3
c3
03 03
i — 1 Trt Ih
»H 73
73
>-.
t-i {->
O 02
S CD
CD
CD
tn
Ih
Ih Ih
OOOccOO^^OOO
PQOOOO
co
73
CD
IQ
CO OS
00 CO
0J
CD
OS iO
O CO
CO rH
OS
o
CO
r-
t-H
O
IQ
CI
O N (O
CN CO
CO
CTi
!> OS
O "#
CO !>
r-l
■*
cc-
o
T-H CO
Mean an
growt
per acr
O
CN
i—i
i-H O O
1-H 1-1
f-l
l-H
o o
i-H i-H
l-H O
o
l-H
o
o
tH t-H
-t>
T-H
co
OC5M
iO CO
CI
t^
i-H CO
O OS
N ■*
t-
CC
05
i-H
os »o
CO
i—i
05 CO CO
1-1 -*
IO
t^
N 00
OS CN
■* co
l-H
01
01
T-H
OS Tt<
3
U
CM
T-H
l-H l-H
l-H
l-H
l-H
l-H
i-H
i-H
73
Ih
OS
OS
O OS CO
00 l-H
tN
CO
^h CO
O tF
■^ OS
co
CO
X
i-H
CO o
as
O
O
IO
O
O (ON
l-H 00
o
IO
os io
CN i-H
TH CO
O
01
1— 1
o
CO l-H
CO
iH
T-l
CN
01
Ol
l-H
T-H l-H
CN
l-H
CN
3 o3
O U
43
o
01
1—1 1—1 to
O "HH
IO
o
O iO
i-H O
o o
o
O
01
01
>o ■*
> o
CN
r^
O CN CO
co co
CN
o
IO N
00 CO
O LO
cc
CC
CO
Ol
OS CO
^ a
3
o
CN
o
OS CO CO
OJ t>
Jj
co
oo co
o o
CN CO
l-H
rH
>o 00
CO
i— i
l-H
<— i
01
I-H
l-H i-H
CN
i-H
l-H
. -+3
OS
CO
IO CO
05 OS
o
CO
>o CO
co t+i
co co
■*
-CH
IO
01
CO CN
CD
U
-u
CD
13)
"o*^
I>
c
t^ co ■>*
■HH 00
CI
o
Iv 1>
CO o
OS 00
l-H
o
IO
Ol
os oo
> 3
I— 1
CO
CO O CN
CN O
(N
-*
O rH
i-H CN
Tfl O
o
t-H
c
o
o »o
•S.-P
a
M 0)
CO
-*
CN CN CO
O OS
CJ
IO
os oo
CO CN
■* 00
■*
l-H
OS
CO
OS CN
'55
S^
IO
to
IO CN CO
■«*» CN
•<*
■HH
CN CO
CO CO
t« CN
l-H
cc
l-H
i-H
CN iO
a)
w
bO
o3
U
CD
o
oo
•HH tfj l-H
O CO
CO
o
CO CN
CN i-H
00 iO
i-H
C
rH
t^
CO 00
>•
I— 1
T-H
to
l> CO CO
IO CO
t
»o
CO "HH
*# IO
co co
Ol
CO
CC
1— 1
-# co
Q'~
<u
2e
CN 00
«o
CO
N O
^
-t
IO
CO
*o3
3 0)
o 4s
o
o
CN CN O
CN
o d
o
rt
o o
r-l CN
O i-H
l— 1
c
C
I>
o d
QJ
gS
'5b 3
CO
o o o
CO O 00
O tH
00 CO
IO
o
CI
O 00
00 CN
o o
>o 00
o o
o oc
o
iO
CC
T—
CO
0C
oc
T* IO
CO i-H
CM <"
co
i— 1
t-l CO CN
CN 00
GO
CO
00 CO
co ^
iO >o
>o
cc
oc
CC
CO r-i
dum-
ber
lanted
er acre
o
o
o o o
O l>
N
!>
o o
o o
o c
o
c
Ol
r-
t>- o
OB
a
O 00 CN
CN O
o
c
l-H l-H
i-H OS
os oc
CC
rH
c
c
O CN
CN
c
O (ON
N OS
ex
a
CN CN
CN 00
00 CC
CC
Ol
M
os
OS N
I—
T-l CN
CN
j-H iH
l-H
1—
CN
a a
^
NN \^
»
Tf
OS
O OS T-i
N iC
01
cc
CN CC
CN 00
>o >o
CC
o
10
Ol
CO CO
3g
T—
T-l I—
l-H
1—
t—
l-H r-i
l-H
tH
i-H
a
rs
c
d
03
Li
03
03
o
c
cs
•a
03
^3
03
tO
'3
43
B J
S c?
Q
Ih
Ih
c
O o
CO
(1)
1
3
C
a
e
a
T
c
a
73
f< Cv
+3 . -
3 r"=
«-
c
-*-
>-
a
E
E
3 bi
C
s(
a
j S
c
el
o3 03 n
1 o3 03 "«
-u —< J-
0 C -*
a
T
"5
c
4<
c
■r
C
1
E
c
C
X
s
73 kH
■•8 s
C o3
O -+3
cj 0
t
-
03 F>
i
O C
>- 03
O &0
03 «
CO r-
tS
OE
OS cj
W co
03
03
c
c
>>
43
8
I
l
!
J
03
Ih
03
cr
a
d
Ih
t- C
c
CC
c
c
° ■:
3
O
O
a
S
03 OJ b
73 73 c
U a
0 bo t
fl c
"a
o S
o 5
1
a
a
a
o3 03 b
mm.*
t
a
D 0
S
• -
) b
a
cu bO
•J? o
a
a
CD cd J:
a a
< <
■<
<
M b
o c
0 M ci
0 -i->
5 C
if
P-
c
£
0 <
o
<
(7
o3 d %
CO V
a
or
03 o!
c3 0
o c
c
p
c
c
0 oo
5
1 < £
o c
t-l r-
c
r-
C
o c
J? 03
O CO
o3 a
co a
i
CC
-/
a
/
03 O
CO T-]
a> ,
s
CC
£>
CC
£ °'
P"
1 CN
1 CO ■* iC
io cc
8
CC
t>- t^
N 00
oo a
a
C
T-
0
CN CO
a
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 25
to frost injury. The growth of groves Nos. 2 and 3, although growing
in soil of the same character, and within a half mile of No. 1, was
slower because of severe injury from frost on several occasions and a
closer spacing.
The largest Sugar Gum plantation in the state is that situated near
East Whittier, Los Angeles County, on the Murphy Ranch (fig. 15).
The spacing here is 6 by 8 feet and the site is a dry rolling adobe
foothill slope. The trees have had no irrigation or cultivation since
the year after planting, but have grown very well under the trying
conditions. The grove near Santa Barbara is growing on a steep
slope, has had no cultivation or care since planting, but has grown at
the rate of 1.43 cords per acre per year. The foothill groves in Orange
and San Diego counties show the unfavorable influence of extreme
drought in the more or less stunted form of the trees and slower rate of
growth (fig. 13).
"While the rate of growth of this species is about the same as that
of Red Gum the trees show much better form and can be used for poles
or piling, for which uses the Red Gum is usually too crooked.
Miscellaneous Species
Between sixty and seventy-five species of Eucalyptus are present
in California, but most of them have been set out as single trees or in
small groups and are not found in plantations of any considerable size.
Besides the four principal species already discussed twenty-one species
were found to be growing in plantations large enough to warrant
measurement. Most of these were growing only at the Santa Monica
Forestry Station or in the Del Rosa experimental plantations of the
U. S. Forest Service in San Bernardino County, but in a few cases
plantations were found in other localities. The measurements in these
various groves are summarized in Table 6, the calculations of volume
being based on the Blue Gum taper measurements.
It will be noted that very few of the species shown in Table 6 com-
pare favorably in rate of growth with the four principal species. For
most of them the mean annual growth is between one-half and one cord
per acre, indicating a low degree of adaptability to California con-
ditions. A few of the more promising species may be briefly discussed
as follows :
Manna Gum (E. viminalis) most nearly resembles Blue Gum in
its climatic and soil requirements as well as in rate of growth. In
Australia it grows to immense size (250 feet) but is a moisture loving
tree, frequenting rich pockets in the hill country up to 4000 feet eleva-
26
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
tion. It grows rapidly and is abundant in Tasmania and Victoria, also
occurring in New South Wales and South Australia. The trunk
appears in two forms, one with outer bark very rough and scaly or
fibrous and adhering well up into the crown, and another with the
outer bark almost entirely exfoliated, leaving a clean, smooth, white
bole. The timber is not durable and is not often used. The leaves
Fig. 10. Fig. 17.
Fig. 16. — A 9-year-old grove of Manna Gum (E. viminalis) on adobe clay
soil in Wildcat Canyon, Contra Costa County. The spacing is 8 X 8 feet. The
trees have made relatively slow growth on this heavy soil and northerly
exposure.
Fig. 17. — These two Manna Gums on the Chico Forestry Station, Butte
County, were over 100 feet high at 28 years of age. The Manna Gum is an
excellent tree for many parts of the Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys
because of its resistance to frost injury and its rapidity of growth.
shed a sort of "manna," whence its name. The latter characteristic
has not been noted in California plantations, but the species may be
easily recognized by its straight, cylindrical, usually chalky white
trunk; narrow sickle-shaped leaves; and small, green shoe-button-like
fruits which are usually borne in threes in the shape of a cross. Groves
1 and 4 indicate the rapid growth of this species in the central coast
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 27
counties when widely spaced on fairly good soil. Grove 5 in Contra
Costa County has made poorer growth, as the soil is a heavy adobe
clay and the situation is a cold, northeast slope (fig. 16). The spacing
in this grove was also closer than in groves 1 and 4. Manna Gum seems
poorly suited to climatic and soil conditions of southern California;
large losses occurred in the mesa plantation at Santa Monica, while
the best trees in this part of the state were growing on fertile, sandy
loam bottomland near the Santa Ana River in Orange County.
One of the largest Manna Gum trees in the state is situated on the
ranch of J. C. McCubbin near Reedley, Tulare County. This tree is
growing in the open and has received soil moisture in large quantities
from the irrigation of adjacent vineyards. Other fine specimens are
growing in the San Joaquin County Hospital grounds near Stockton,
in the parks of Sacramento, and at many other points in the Great
Valley. A group of about 25 trees at the Chico Forestry Station, Butte
County, have grown more rapidly and are larger and more perfect in
their development than any other trees on the station (fig. 17). They
have at all times of the year an adequate supply of soil moisture from
a nearby creek. Well grown individual trees have been noted as far
north along the coast as Humboldt County and in every case the trees
seem very frost hardy. It seems evident that Manna Gum is second
only to Blue Gum in rate of growth and adaptability to a wide range
of California conditions, but like Blue Gum, it has the disadvantage
of producing a poorer quality of wood than that of many other
Eucalyptus.
Bed Ironbark (E. sideroxylon) often called Black Ironbark, is
widely distributed but not very abundant in Victoria, New South
Wales and Queensland at elevations below 2000 feet where mature
trees yield excellent hard, dark red, durable timber, but clear lumber
is hard to get because of the presence of "shake" or resin pockets.
It seems not to be thoroughly at home in California and plantations
have grown with only moderate rapidity. The species may be recog-
nized by its coal-black, furrowed bark, which is full of grains of shiny,
resinous kino. The foliage is bluish green and the ultimate branchlets
have a gracefully weeping habit. The flowers are pink or reddish in
color and the fruits are goblet shaped, about three-fourths of an inch
in length, shiny purplish brown in color and they occur in threes on
long stalks. Red Ironbark is one of the most beautiful trees in the
mixed plantation at Santa Monica but when grown in the open it has
not been satisfactory because of severe damage by wind (fig. 18). The
species is not very frost hardy and in general cannot be considered
very satisfactory for growing in California.
28
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
White Ironbark (E. leucoxylon) is somewhat similar to the preced-
ing species in regard to its leaves, flowers and fruits, but may usually
be easily distinguished by its smooth, chalky -white bark. In Australia
it is a medium sized tree with coarse outer bark, which is often persist-
ent so as not to expose the clear white inner bark. Wood from mature
Fig. 18. Fig. 19.
Fig. 18. — Ked Iron bark (E. sideroxylon) is a beautiful ornamental tree for
parts of southern California but when grown farther north, it has been subject
to damage by wind and frost. The poor form of these street trees in Decoto,
Alameda County, emphasizes this point.
Fig. 19 — Ked Ironbark and Manna Gum growing near Del Eosa, San Bernardino
County, made fairly good growth for such a dry site. The picture was taken
six months after all of these experimental plantations had been completely
destroyed by the severe fire of October, 1922. Plantations are very subject to
fire damage and should be carefully protected.
Australian trees is light pinkish gray in color and dries well but
slowly. It is durable and makes good but hard lumber. In California,
White Ironbark is not a straight tree, but usually grows with a some-
what twisted and branched trunk. Its light yellow or pink flowers are
produced in great profusion and these with the white, irregular shaped
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 29
trunk make the tree very desirable for ornamental purposes. The
three groves measured indicate that under fairly good soil conditions
in southern California this species will produce slightly more than one
cord per acre per year. Very few trees of this species have been
planted in the central or northern part of the state, and practically
all of those observed show more or less serious frost injury. A single
White Ironbark on the Chico Forestry Station has a short, scrubby,
much branched top, the result of repeated freezing back ; and a tree
on the campus at Berkeley is very similar in its habit of growth. The
species cannot be recommended for planting outside of southern
California except in sheltered, frostless situations.
Bed or Forest Mahogany (E. resinifera) in its native habitat is a
medium size tree of local distribution in the coast regions of New
South Wales and Queensland, usually scattered in stands of other
species on moist sites but is sometimes found on dry hillsides. The
lumber is straight grained and works well, but is not durable. The
timber is not extensively used, probably because of its scattered dis-
tribution. In California, when grown under good conditions of soil,
moisture and climate, the Red Mahogany produces a splendid straight
stem clothed with soft fibrous reddish bark. The leaves are thick and
glossy green and borne on dark red twigs while the clustered fruits
are slightly constricted at the base. All of these characteristics make
the tree easy to recognize. The chief difficulty with this species is its
susceptibility to frost. Preliminary tests of the wood showed it to be
superior to most Eucalyptus grown in California, but frost injury has
caused the removal of several groves of this species and it cannot be
considered a satisfactory tree except in nearly frost free localities. It
is very desirable as a decorative tree for southern California, and
although its growth is only moderately rapid, its good form and the
comparative durability of its wood may make this species suitable for
poles and piling. It cannot be grown satisfactorily in the central or
northern parts of the state.
Sydney Blue Gum or Flooded Gum {E. saligna) and Swamp
Mahogany (E. ootryoides) are very similar in character except that
the former has a smooth whitish or greenish upper bark and is a large
tree, while the latter has coarse, rough bark throughout and is smaller
and scrubbier. Dr. Maiden is inclined to consider ootryoides as a
variety of saligna. In New South Wales and Queensland both trees
grow best on moist bottom lands, damp valleys and hollows of the
mountains. The wood of saligna is one of the best very hard woods of
eastern Australia. It is tough, very hard, of a bright pink color and
is straight grained with a somewhat interlocking fiber. It is highly
30 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
valued for wagonwheel felloes and hubs, and being very durable is
extensively used for railway ties and in boat building. E. botryoides
is said to be the finest shade tree among the Eucalypts for Australian
conditions.
Fine specimen trees of both Flooded Gum and Swamp Mahogany
are present in the mixed plantation at the Santa Monica Station, but
since both are moisture loving species, they cannot be expected to
make very satisfactory growth on most of the semi-arid sites in Cali-
fornia without irrigation. It is rather remarkable that both have
grown at the rate of over one cord per acre per year on sites as dry as
those at Santa Monica and in the Livermore Hills. As neither of these
trees is especially frost hardy, they should be planted with caution
except in sheltered or frost free situations.
Karri (E. diversicolor) is the giant tree of Western Australia which
reaches a height of 300 feet and vies with the Victorian Mountain Ash
(E. regnans) for supremacy in size among Australian trees. Karri
grows in a comparatively small region usually on damp, rich flats
where no frost occurs. Its wood is bright cherry red, is very hard, not
durable, and checks badly in drying, but because of the great size of
the trees, timber may be obtained in immense sizes free from all defects
and great quantities of it are exported as railway ties or scantlings.
Karri is apparently poorly suited to California conditions, being slow
in rate of growth and easily injured by frost and wind. Individual
Karri trees at Santa Monica have outstripped all other species in rate
of height growth, but growth in plantations has not been satisfactory.
This species will not succeed except in sheltered and practically frost
free situations.
Messmate Stringybark (E. obliqua) although rare in plantations
is deserving of special mention because of its frost hardiness. In its
native region it grows very tall (250 feet) and it is considered one of
the hardiest timber trees in Australia. In Tasmania, Victoria and
New South Wales it is a common associate of the Giant Gum (E.
regnans) and above 2000 feet elevation it forms mixed stands with
E. delegatensis, another very hardy species which has not as yet been
tried in California. The two species are cut together and sold as
"Tasmanian Oak," used mainly for car construction. The Messmate
Stringybark is a rough barked tree, very straight and tall, and the
timber is extensively used for scantlings and rough construction.
Although fairly durable the timber is usually of very poor quality on
account of numerous pockets filled with red, liquid kino gum. It
chacks badly in drying, and is generally inferior to the Mountain Ash
(E. regnans) for building and carpentry. Del Rosa is the only place
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 31
in California where this species is growing in plantation form but
individual specimens are found at many points in the state. At the
Chico Station in Butte County this tree has made individual growth
which is exceeded only by Manna Gum, Blue Gum and Red Gum, and
many fine trees of this species are growing in the San Francisco Bay
region. These trees are easily recognizable by their rough, fibrous bark
Fig. 20. Fig. 21.
Fig. 20. — Specimen rows of Lemon Scented Gum (E. maculata citriodora)
which have persisted on the dry gravelly foothill soil of the Bixby Kanch,
Orange County, but have made very slow growth. On good soil and with some
irrigation, this is a beautiful ornamental tree.
Fig. 21. — This- pile of 12-inch cordwood was cut from an average tree
(4.8 inches by 53 feet) in a T^-year-old Blue Gum grove near Lakeside, San
Diego County." When stacked as shown, it measured 3% stacked cubic feet, or
34 such trees are required to produce one standard cord of 12-inch fire wood.
Fuel is the chief use to which the California grown Eucalyptus have been put.
and the unsymmetrical form of the base of the leaves. It seems certain
that this tree will do well in plantations under a variety of California
conditions, but the wood, being of such inferior quality in Australia,
will probably be suitable only for fuel.
32
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
o
m
03
3
df ^
63 * 2-
fl ° * '
0J M 01
03
o
O
+3
o
a>
-u
5 co
oj a
. U O
d httn
co . to
CJ73 _, co
^> O..— i CO
» "3 S >> «j
•5 > otj-S
73 £ » §73
<10Qcq«j
o3
3
o
^ CO Oi Is* ^
© ©t4i00©
•*ooto
00 t^-^ 00 00
■<4t iO •■# CO iO
a
o
-4-3
43
. . o>
0)0-1*3
§• 8/fl ®
J2,2 c3 a
03 CO £j i O
J%~~ % 3
73 O 03
oj'S'a; S >,
•9 > > St?
.2 ^ * £ a
13 tn ^ « 3
<!OODm
HlOHtOO
^f CO CO rt CO
OOOHO
^©■oiot+i
03 03
GO CO
a) co
.as
03 S S
a-2-2
03 >> >?
OSS
•— i co co
>>> >
£ 8 2
ooo
O^+liH
CNiHtjh
00COt~
OOCM
03 6 .
Cfl eg co
a°^
03 _^> n
OS
^O
tHt>-00
©coco
HOO
OON
©©CO
03
o
43
"S
^a*
* § s
£°a
8> >>§
>73 O
d fl O
OcoQ
»Ht^©
r-idd
C0C5 1O
©CO 00
CD
>
03
u
o
CO
CN
CO
s
O
43
43
O
£i
o>
4£
'S
03
o3 a
S *>
fl co
"co S
> O
CO©
do
©©
coco
a
^ J
w o
tH
o
W
P-i
m
O ^
M JlJ
73
fc-.
O
o
3
o1*:
P> 3
o
43
^43
CD l-H
M
03 l-H CO
£ pq-S
3 o>
o +=
03
>
f
m
65
bJO 3
• 3 43
CQ "»
3 «0 fl o3
aa
00 CN rfiO ■*
©OOrjHOO©
CO >0
©00cO©00
00COO5©i>
tNi>COtNiO
CO id
N.COCO CO
CN'tO^r-l
CO f-t
i-HCOCOiO©
COTjHCNiOCO
00-*©"5i-l
iO©CNO-<+l
©O 00
CI t4) o © Tji
lOOOiOiO
^ rH TJH N. t> ©
t- COOOIO
©0©k0©
©CN i-i CO 00
CNr^CN-*©
(Nr-I
!>©00»OCN
CO t>- ©' © rjH
■<+l-*<N'+t©
CO »-H 00 t*i t^
COt^.00©CO
, ■OCOOOO'-I
M >OCMiOt>CN
03
3
O
4)
H
Q
Ohhqh
ONS«5<0
CNCNCNCNCN
•<+! IN 00 CO ■*
CO ^ ^ CO ^
rg 00CO©C0tN
„ Tj< 00 © tO ■*
2 t-i
P.
"5
u
3
OCNiOOO
. t>^ IO* oc i t>i *-i
«S lOCOCOOOCO
OOOOJO
00 •— I i— I »H CO
©CNCNtN"*
03
3
O
©CO
(NtN'-H
i-i i-( CO
©»Of^
00 CO©
O— 1|>
tH i-l CN
CNt^O
OTt<CN
T+l r-l ©
„ I^TJHCN
® COCOtJH
s
H
o
g
'e
&
COCN00
COtjh'i>
CD
©
CO
©©©
©CN©
©t^co
•-ICN
T3
o>
Ph
I.
I-H IO »0
i-( ©CO
Ot^CN
HlOH
©00 CO
Tt<
■*©
CN©
>>
3
03 TjHCO©
M
O
S
03
CO
TfH
tHCN
-#CN
T3
lO©^
"5CO §3
a
o
^ o
©Ot^"*-!
OJ
3
3 ©
© CO Jj
© Q)
"a
S
©© o
CNOOU
t^co
CN
©©iO
CN©00'
CNiO'O
COCN©
rH©t^
a cnoo>o
5 (Nl-HT+l
bfi
o
s
03
I
p,
CN rH tH >5 ©
^ CDHH
a rococo
oocnco
^41 ^41 T4I
©oo
t^iOt^
OOCOtH
tHt^TJH
©o©
CNOO-H
t^©CN
CN tH
«
03
£>
a
o
•d
OJ
>
03
CO
T1
73
03
O
<-.
m
o
73
3
Si
&q
CN
©
CN
©
©
©
©
73
6q
©©
©CO
CNCO
t+ICN
lOCO
©O
co>o
TffO
03
bd ©CN
I TjHCN
COO
©CO
3 iO
1 o°
©o
CO©
IO
o©
CNr-"
t^CN
CN<H
0) t,
M 03
<5^
tiHCO©CNO
©CN©©!>
©>HCN
tHiHCN
©T+I©t^
y->0><3i
CN
CN
Tfl©
3
•s
o
43
03
OJ
3
3
O
O
?> •
o
o3'>
■ -S 03 3 O
„i 4) 3 CO
tH CN CO -^'O
CD
s
03 >
H CO CO O g
5 3 B1^ 42
hOOQP
o
a
73
ti N
03 H
3 C,
03
73
53 03 o3 B 3
^ Ji1 i 03 o3
"lOOaice
iHCNCNCO-*
03 03
o o
"B'S
o o
3 o3 03
CO 43 4->
73 B B
H o3 o3
co co
aj OJ
-»"3"co
» MM
^ G a
J2 d d
I CNCO
O 3
OJ 43
73 3
^.03
5o3
o
IS
.o
03 M 03 co
73 e"d 3
CO J3 OJ ^
a^ a^
133 o * S
tHCNCO'<+l
03
CJ
•a
M « o
^^
tvoPnQ
o
5
CO CO TP
'co'oj a
fl B co
co co fl
O O o3
1-5 h-l CQ
tHCNCO
fl
03
CQ
e3
o
•a
si
03^
c^Q
CO
CO
co^
OJ *3
-5 03
OJ
OJ fl
B)
M B
0
fl CO
<J
«U«
co
CO O
O
O S
l-l
hJcQ
tH CN
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 33
S
a
a
a
o
O
O
o
-»j
-t>
-*J
-u
-»->
*»
H-3
H->
o
O
O
o
-Q
rQ
Xi
rO
o
CD
CD
CD
—
-u
•4J
-u
•a
a
c
3
-i->
03
03
03
03
r-l
03
3
CD cp
to
3
3
3
(30
bD
3
'3
co
CO
— —
co
CO
co
CO
CO
«
<»
<0
o o
•n
cu
CD
CD
"O
-o
-o
CD
<u
2
to
s
'ot'ot
co
a
a
a
CD
CD
CD
CO
CD
co
bfl
a
J^.0.
j>>
>f
i?i?
O
>>
0>
j>.
>>
O
o
ft
O
ft
_>>
"oS"© >>
"53
<L>
"53
"53 "53
a
"53
— »
CD
a
a
a
CD
~s
> >T3
>
^3
>
> >
o
>
>
>
O
o
O
x>
>
03 S3 C
e3
O
03
o3 03
o
03
03
03
CJ
CJ
o
o
c3
u *" e3
u
T3
(-1
U hi
<u
S-,
Sh
t-i
CD
CD
CD
-o
k
OOco
a
<J
a
OO
Q
o
o
o
Q
Q
P
<
0
"3
r »
T5
COrfrH
•>*
Tt<
o
00-^
CO
rH
CO
■*
r-l
•<*i
OJ
o
O
s
(-,
rj< CO rH
>-i
l—l
o
I-H CO
CO
OJ
id
OJ
co
CN
rH
co
s
c
03
-^> k
O
O
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
c
c3
CD
2.
« 2
«1
CN -HrH
CO
CO
o
CO l-H
o
n
t>-
IO
rH
"5
CO
I-H
o
a
3*
■«J<COO
o
o
OS
OCN
CO
00
■*
00
•
i-H
r-l
1— 1
I-H i-H
d
t>*
co
o»
■*
io
IO
CN
iO
r oo
T3
(OiOO
>o
CO
05
CNCO
o
00
■*
CN
o
»o
CO
rH
-H
t-I
co
OJ
•
k
0
O
IO lOO
CN
l-H
d
1—1
CO
I-H
rt< i-h
I-HCN
CO
l-H
i-H
t>"
CO
rH
i-H
iO
CN
d
00
3 S3 •
O k
•fO
> 2
t*-t
CM COO
o
CD
wo
mo
CN
CO
CO
t^
i-H
t-
o
CN
00
■
a
OOH
CO
CN
CN
t^-TH
t^
co
co
00
OJ
I-H
**
CO
IO
IB
lO-*00
i— 1
OS
CN
CNC5
(N
o
CO
i-H
»o
CN
o
3
o
CD
<— 1
l-H
i-H i-H
r-l
i-H
■
a>
k
■•a
' . .
Oi-HCO
CN
lO
J3
CJ
a>
-
03
•^00
J*
(-.
03
00
o
a
3
■*
CN
OJ
t~
l-H
IO
l—l
O «♦-
>3
C
01
COCNiO
HiHCO
CN
CN
a
(N
CO
00
CO*
c
O
T}1 l-H
I-HCN
Xi
>>
a
CO
d
s
3
o
l-H
o
0)
a
CJ
OJ
iO
o
d
CO
d
i-H
CN
o"
i-H
S
c
•5 -J
09
m
03
k
O
>
<
-3
bC-^
'53 2,
CJ
CO
1
c
o
£
r-3
1
e
k
©
-a
O •— i •— '
s
3
o
OJ
3
a
a>
T3
O
O
E
1
e
s
lO
c
.2
"3
i-H
l-H
a>
>
03
a>
i
tS
o
I*
t-
03
00 (N
t^.
o
>>
0>
c
o
1
C3
k
o
"t3
OJ
OJ
CJ
03
•-9
U
CD
03
CD
1
i-H
C3
CO
H
CO
o
B
CO
OS
3i
k
Q
u
k
u
s
99
i-H
i-o
I
.~ cj
Eg
CO CO ^i
oo©
co^cd
k
tu
co
CD
Q
1
CO
CO
00
CO
o
CO
3
<!
1
00
s
1— 1
co
CNCO
COCO
03
s
CO
CO
r-l
o
CO
CN
CO
co
i
CJ
"a
a
<
1
s
CO
o
iO
l-H
CO
S
e
b
CJ
•^»
00
OO
i-H
t>
i-H
~5
u
S
•r>
i
©
Co
00
CN
co
e
u
u
C3
!~
u
10
CO
00
u
CJ
u
r»
5
00
l-H
OJ
CN
co
i
r o>
©
,k
3
v.
13
1
1
e
s
a
00
3
o
3
A
"S.
3
A
3
"3
>
o <o
e
u
coco
-HC0O
I— 1
00
3
A
3
&h
o
oo
00
S
"5
o
e
e
p.
00
00
<N
C3
k
oo
S
OO
CO
00
CN
s
00
3
"5.
3j
os
CO
e
3
"oo
00
3
i-H
d
s
3
00
3
HO
A
3
i-H
d
^3>
u
3
&q
CO
CO
rH
-21
u
a
O
r9
"a
u
00
CO
I-H
a-,
u
3
&q
o
En
*
-2 3
"3) H
s «
8
09
3
COrH©
1— I
00
o
7—{
CN
l-H
"S.
"3
co»o
OrH
"5.
^3>
*«
CO
00
o
3
6q
00
CN
"3
i-H
1!
CJ
3
&H
CO
d
O
■<#
o
CO
CO
r-H
^co «
a
CNCOO
I-l
CO
I-H
3
t^t^
u
3
CN
CO
CJ
3
■>*
»o
rH
t-H
Bq
6q
Rl
&H
-a £
S
OGCN
o
o
O
OO
o
o
o
o
O
O
o
o
o
S >--£o3
~ 0) C
&h
r-l fH CN
CN
00
CN
l-H T-H
i-H
CN
CN
CN
rH
i-H
rH
00
N
CNCN CN
t^
CO
t^
(NCN
CN
t^
t~
^
CN
CN
CN
CO
r-
3-Q * fe
I-H I— I
CN
CN
i-H i-H
r-H
CN
CN
CN
rH
rH
rH
a
»■. co
bCoS
CNCO00
i-H
OJ
T*
CNCO
OJ
CO
•<#
■*
OJ
OJ
OJ
OJ
-H
-
n" cd
l-l I-H
t-i
i-H
l-H l-H
i-H
r-l
l-H
—
c
3
O
O
CD
CD CD g
a a a
03 03 o
hhu
ooS
03
<H
s
rC
•h
09
CD CD ^
c c -3
03 03 3
Ih U (J
OOgq
iCN
3
03
CD
ti
3
<J
co
O
rJ
03
T3
CD
3
03
CO
CD
3
CD CD
bfi M
3 3
03 03
ti (-
OO
CD CD
be bfi
3 3
03 03
OO
o
«
"53
Q
3
03
CO
3
CO
03
CJ
3
O
03
•*J
3
03
CO
rf — -— .
3
ki
CD
bO
CD
bO
CD
bO
CD
3
8
3
PQ
<<
<^
<
3
en
a>
CO
03
O
O
O
CO
l-H
i-l
r-l
o
O
Ph
"53
Q
o
Ph
"53
Q
•n
T3
-d
(H
kc
k
03
03
03
3
3
3
ki
(-.
k
CD
CD
CD
PQ
m
PQ
3
3
3
03
03
03
CQ
CO
CO
03
03
"O
73
CD
CD
o
34 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
Growth in Mixed Stands at Santa Monica Station, Los Angeles County.
In 1890 a portion of the Santa Monica Forestry Station surround-
ing the buildings was set aside for use as an arboretum in which trees
could be grown in mixed stand and with irregular spacing. A number
of species were planted that year and the collection was added to as
seedlings became available. The result is a mixed stand containing
the largest number of Eucalyptus species in the state ; a stand in which
except for competition with each other, the individual species have
had the opportunity for unrestricted development. The spacing was
wide enough so that competition has not been unduly severe in most
cases and the area received thorough cultivation annually for a much
longer period than is usual in plantations. The soil is a sedimentary
gravelly loam of open texture and only moderate fertility on which
the raising of farm crops is impossible without irrigation. The
Eucalyptus trees have not been irrigated.
A summary of the measurements of trees of different ages in this
mixed stand is given in Table 7 in which the different species are
arranged alphabetically. Some of the trees have made really remark-
able growth when it is considered that the mesa on which they stand
is about as poor and dry a site as any that could be found adjacent to
the coast in southern California. The factor most favorable to the
trees is the high humidity of the ocean winds during the otherwise
dry summer months.
When measured, the oldest trees in this plantation were 27 years
old. The leading species in diameter growth at this age were the
following :
Inches d.b.h
Blue Gum (E. globulus) 29.4
Bed Ironbark (E. sideroxylon rosea) 19.5
Blackbutt (E. piperita) 19.1
Gray Gum (E. tereticornis) .... 17.9
Karri (E. diver sicolor) 17.9
Manna Gum (E. viminalis) 16.8
Yate (E. cornuta) , 16.5
Tuart (E. gomphocephala) ...-. i 14.7
Red Gum (E. rostrata) 14.6
TABLE 7
Growth of Specimen Eucalypts, Santa Monica Forestry Station,
Los Angeles County
Plot
A
M
M
G
M
A
M
A
A
A
A
A
M
A
M
A
G
M
M
A
G
A
G
A
A
A
G
M
A
G
G
G
A
A
A
G
A
G
A
G
M
A
G
M
A
G
A
G
A
H
M
G
A
G
A
G
A
M
G
A
G
A
C
A
M
C
A
M
A
M
A
M
A
C
M
Species
E. amygdalina
E. amygdalina numerosa
E. bicolor
E. bosistoana
E. botryoides
E. calophylla
E. calophylla
E. citriodora
E. citriodora
E. coriacea
E. cornuta
E. cornuta lehmannii
E. cornuta lehmannii
E. corymbosa
E. corymbosa
E. corynocalyx
E. corynocalyx
E. cosmophylla
E. decipiens
E. diversicolor
E. diversicolor
E. eugenioides
E. eugenioides
E. ficifolia
E. globulus
E. gomphocephala
E. goniocalyx
E. goniocalyx
E. ovata
E. ovata
E. haemastoma
E. hemiphloia
E. leptophleba?
E. leucoxylon
E. linearis
E. longifolia
E. macrorrhyncha
E. McArthurii
E. marginata
E. megacarpa
E. melanophloia
E. melliodora
E. melliodora
E. microcorys
E. obcordata?
E. obliqua
E. occidentalis
E. occidentalis
E. paniculata
E. paniculata
E. paniculata
E. pilularis
E. piperita
E. piperita
E. platypus
E. platypus
E. polyanthemos
E. polyanthemos
E. pulverulenta
E. punctata
E. punctata grandiflora..,
E. resinifera
E. resinifera
E. rostrata
E. rostrata
E. saligna
E. sideroxylon rosea
E. sideroxylon rosea
E. siderophloia
E. stuartiana
E. tereticornis
E. tereticornis
E. viminalis
E. viminalis
E. viminalis
Num-
Date
ber of
of
Age
trees
d.b.h.
Height
plant-
years
meas-
ing
ured
1890
27
1
8.2
42
1897
20
1
7.2
28
1897
20
6
5.8
35
1911
16
2
8.6
34
1897
20
10
7.9
38
1890
27
2
13.9
48
1897
20
6
9.1
36
1890
27
5
10.1
50
sprouts
13
8
4.0
26
1890
27
1
5.0
35
1890
27
7
16.5
46
1890
27
2
7.8
40
1897
20
2
2.5
20
1890
27
3
11.5
62
1897
20
6
4.5
24
1890
27
3
13.7
76
1911
16
2
6.6
39
1897
20
2
5.7
29
1897
20
6
5.3
24
1890
27
2
17.9
97
1911
16
3
7.1
34
1890
27
1
10.0
59
1911
16
4
4.6
24
1890
27
3
12.4
22
1890
27
1
29.4
69
1890
27
5
14.7
69
1911
16
1
6.7
21
1897
20
5
7.4
28
1890
27
3
13.6
58
1911
16
1
5.8
42
1911
16
1
5.3
28
1911
16
4
5.4
32
1890
27
2
3.8
23
1890?
25 +
7
13.5
49
1890
1911
1890
1911
27-
16
27
16
1
2
1
1
3.3
7.4
12.1
5.6
15
38
40
42
1890
1911
1897
1890
1911
1897
1890
1911
1890
1911
1890
?
1897
1911
1890
1911
1890
1911
1890
1897
1911
1897
1911
27
16
20
27
16
20
27
16
27
16
27
20 ±
20
16
27
16
27
16
27
20
16
27
16
1
1
2
4
1
4
1
1
2
2
2
16
4
2
1
1
1
1
6
12
1
1
2
5.3
2.3
5.9
13.9
9.1
7.4
7.3
7.3
8.8
4.1
9.0
6.8
7.0
3.6
19.1
6.8
1.4
2.2
12.8
6.5
7.4
15.4
5.3
13
20
38
56
40
26
38
30
21
16
49
40
34
24
54
24
10
14
45
34
21
51
26
1890
1897 ±
1890
1897
1897?
1890
1897
1890
1897
1890
1897
1890
1897?
1897
27
20?
27
20
20 ±
27
20
27
20
27
20
27
20 ±
20
1
25
5
10
3
4
5
4
2
1
2
2
10
1
8.3
7.0
14.6
6.2
9.2
19.5
6.5
11.5
5.1
17.9
10.1
16.8
12.7
3.9
37
45
68
35
57
45
43
67
26
96
43
54
60
44
Form
Crooked
Fair
Fair
Good
Branching
Branching
Branching
Straight
Straight
Crooked
Branching
Branching
Scrubby
Straight
Scrubby
Straight
Straight
Scrubby
Scrubby
Straight
Straight
Straight
Good
Branching
Spreading top
Fork tops
Crooked
Leaning, crooked
Crooked
Forked top
Leaning
Forked
Scrubby
Branching
Small
Straight
Crooked
Crooked
Crooked
Forked top
Forked top
Crooked
Forked
Crooked
Crooked
Straight
Crooked
Crooked
Fair
Crooked
Crooked
Broken tops
Straight
Forked top
Scrubby
Scrubby
Branching
Branching
Crooked
Spreading top
Forked
Straight
Straight
Crooked
Crooked
Straight
Crooked
Crooked
Straight
Crooked
Straight
Straight
Straight
Straight
Fair
Remarks
Fair.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Fair.
Fair.
Dying.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Poor.
Fair.
Thrifty.
Good.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Scrubby.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Thrifty.
Poor.
Thrifty.
Scrubby.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Scrubby.
Fair.
Fair.
Fair.
Thrifty.
Poor.
Poor.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Fair.
Good.
Thrifty.
Good.
Good.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Good.
Good.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Thrifty.
Fair.
Excellent.
Good.
Thrifty.
Thrifty.
Fair.
36 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
In height growth there is a somewhat different grouping of leading
species as follows :
Feet
Karri (E. diversicolor) 97
Gray Gum (E. tereticornis) 96
Sugar Gum (E. cor y no calyx) 76
Blue Gum (E. globulus) 69
Tuart (E. gomphocephala) 69
Bed Gum (E. rostrata) 68
Broad-leaved Ironbark (E. siderophloia) 67
Manna Gum (E. viminalis) 54
Yate (E. cornuta) 46
Several of the less important species averaged between 50 and 60
feet in height, but were far down the list in diameter growth. Three
species not previously discussed show up well in the above list, these
being Yate, Tuart and Broad-leaved Ironbark. The last is a tropical
species of medium size which grows only in northern New South Wales
and Queensland and does not appear to be of much commercial import-
ance there. At Santa Monica it is vigorous and grows much straighter
than many species. Yate (E. cornuta) and Tuart (E. gomphocephala)
are the two hardest and strongest Australian woods and are highly
valued for purposes requiring such properties. They are confined to
narrow areas near Perth in Western Australia where, on account of
their value and comparative scarcity, the state government has
restricted their exportation. At Santa Monica the Tuart is straight
and tall, but has a much branched and somewhat flattened crown while
the Yate has a crooked habit of growth and makes relatively slow
growth in height. The fruits of E. cornuta and of its variety (leh-
mannii) occur in dense clustered heads and give the trees an unique
and interesting decorative appearance. A Yate tree on the campus
at Berkeley is thriving but has a short and crooked trunk.
Table 8 summarizes the growth of twenty-two species planted at
Santa Monica in 1901 in rows, using a 7 by 7 foot spacing throughout.
It will be noted that Blue Gum and Sugar Gum are the outstanding
trees in this tabulation though several others have made very satisfac-
tory growth and were thriving when examined.
Arboretum Plantation at Del Rosa, San Bernardino County.
In 1911 the II. S. Forest Service started an arboretum of Euca-
lyptus species by setting out about thirty varieties in a plot adjacent
to the nursery at the Del Rosa Ranger Station. The spacing through-
out was 12 by 12 feet and nine trees of each species were planted.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 37
Experimental work with Eucalyptus was discontinued by the Forest
Service shortly after this and the arboretum was never enlarged. It
is situated in the dry foothills of the Angeles National Forest on
coarse, granitic soil which is very pervious to moisture. The mean
annual rainfall is about 15 inches, very high temperatures are the rule
in summer and the site may be considered typical of the arid foothill
areas surrounding the irrigated citrus orchards of San Bernardino
TABLE 8
Mixed Eucalyptus Plantation, Santa Monica Forestry Station,
Los Angeles County, Age 16 Years
Number
C5
C8
C9
C 10
c
c
c
c
c
c
C 2
11
12
13
15
16
1
and 4
C3
Co
C 6 and 11
C8
C9
C 10
C 12
C 13
C 14
C 15
C 16
Species
E. sideroxylon
E. globulus
E. pulverulenta
E. viminalis
E. pellita
E. rubida
E. corynocalyx
E. McArthurii
E. stricta
E. viminalis?
E. rostrata
E. botryoides
E. maculata
E. sideroxylon rosea
E. gunnii
E. stellulata
E. melliodora?
E. raveretiana
E. occidentalis
E. eximia
E. robusta
E. sieberiana
Number
planted
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
8
8
Per cent
survival
70
40
40
40
60
10
100
60
40
37
75
37
100
87
75
83
83
62
62
44
75
25
Average
d. b. h.
7.5
11.9
5.9
8.5
5.9
6.1
10.1
9.7
2.4
7.8
6.2
3.3
5.8
8.5
3.5
7.3
6.4
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.9
6.1
Average
height
41
66
32
49
44
40
61
40
14
45
35
25
34
43
28
54.
39
23
29
27
41
35
Remarks
Crooked, fair.
Thrifty.
All crooked.
Thrifty.
Poor, tops dying.
Fair.
Good.
Fair.
Scrubby.
Good.
Crooked, fair.
Scrubby.
Thrifty.
Fair-good.
Suppressed by others.
Good.
Forked, crooked.
Scrubby.
Scrubby.
Scrubby.
Good.
Fair.
The spacing in this plantation was 7 by 7 feet throughout. Each species
was planted in a row by itself. The slower growing or naturally small species
such as E. gunnii, E. eximia and E. sieberiana were badly suppressed by larger
and more rapid growing species.
and adjacent counties. The effects of drought were noticeable in the
appearance of most of the trees and many of them showed that they
had been more or less severely injured by frost. All of these trees, as
well as the adjacent plantations, were destroyed by a forest fire in the
fall of 1922. A summary of measurements made in 1920 is given
in Table 9.
A large number of Eucalyptus species were planted at different
times at the Chico Forestry Station in Butte County, but in many
cases frost damage has been so severe and so frequent that only the
38
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
hardier varieties have reached any considerable size. The results
of measurements of the best trees are given in Table 10. Only Blue
Gum, Manna Gum and Messmate Stringybark are fully at home here.
Other species which persist in scrubby form include E. corynocalyx,
TABLE 9
Mixed Eucalyptus Plantation at Del Eosa Station, San Bernardino County,
Age 9 Years
(Examined March, 1920)
Plot
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Species
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
tereticornis (Cooper) ,
tereticornis
rostrata
crebra
globulus
polyanthemos
coriacea
tributta?
amygdalina
corynocalyx
resinifera
regnans
saligna?
diversicolor
longifolia
ovata
bicolor
punctata
stuartiana
leucoxylon
goniocalyx
calophylla
viminalis
corymbosa
sideroxylon
macrorrhyncha
sieberiana
robusta
cornuta?
rudis
Per cent
survival
Average
d. b. h.
Average
height
100
4.7
34
100
4.6
31
89
5.2
36
33
2.8
33
44
5.6
37
78
3.4
25
11
5.3
33
33
5.0
30
11
3.0
20
100
5.3
41
55
3.3
24
55
2.6
21
78
4.3
24
100
4.3
31
100
3.2
25
89
3.8
28
78
2.9
21
78
3.7
27
0
0
0
22
3.8
28
100
4.0
24
55
2.6
15
78
4.9
35
22
1.9
16
55
5.6
37
33
4.7
34
0
0
0
55
3.2
22
33
3.0
23
22
2.0
21
Condition
Good.
33% Doubles.
Crooked and forked.
Poor form.
Good.
Good.
Forked.
Crooked, leaning.
Scrubby.
Thrifty.
Crooked, scrubby.
Poor.
Crooked, frosted.
Fair.
Fair.
Crooked, leaning.
Crooked, scrubby.
Fair.
Crooked, forked.
Forked, crooked.
Scrubby.
Crooked, leaning.
Scrubby.
Fair.
Crooked.
Fair.
Scrubby.
Forked scrubs.
Trees were planted March, 1911. Spacing 12 by 12 feet. Nine trees of
each species were planted. Examination made March, 1920. Many showed
evidence of frost and drought damage. In numbers 8, 13, and 29 there is
some doubt as to the species. The trees are not well enough developed to make
exact identification possible.
E. botryoides, E. diversicolor, E. leucoxylon and E. punctata. Several
other species though still alive have been so badly damaged that exact
identification is impossible. The splendid growth of Manna Gum is the
outstanding feature of all Eucalyptus trees planted at this station. It
is possible that the tree here given as E. amygdalina may prove to be
a specimen of E. regnans as the two species are very much alike.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 39
Utilization
Fuel. — The principal use to which the wood of Eucalypts grown
in California has been put is fuel. Eucalyptus wood burns brightly
and imparts a delightful fragrance to the house when burned in an
open fireplace. Different species vary somewhat in fuel value, but
TABLE 10
Growth of Specimen Eucalypts, Chico Forestry Station, Butte County
Plot
Age
Number
Number
Species
years
trees
d. b. h.
Height
Form
46
Eucalyptus globulus
30 ±
3
17.3
100
Good.
47
Eucalyptus obliqua
30 ±
3
13.5
63
Good.
48
Eucalyptus viminalis
30 ±
19
29.9
100
Excellent.
36
Eucalyptus amygdalina.
25 ±
1
19.4
36
Crooked; severely frosted 1913.
44
Eucalyptus linearis
25 ±
2
13.1
60
Crooked; severely frosted 1913.
Fig. 22. — A gasoline engine saw outfit cutting 12-inch cordwood from a
Blue Gum grove 15 years old, near Sanger, Fresno County. The crew of three
men can cut 7% cords a day at a cost of about $8.00 a cord for felling, sawing
and stacking. The wood sells for $14.00 to $16.00 a cord at the grove.
all of those grown extensively in California are practically equal to
live oak and much better than most other native fuel woods. Euca-
lyptus wood should be split into the desired sizes while green as it
becomes so tough, when fully seasoned, that splitting is very difficult
and expensive. Trees for fuel should not be too large and the best
age for this purpose is about ten or twelve years. Very large trees
are so expensive to saw and split that contractors do not wish to
40
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — EXPERIMENT STATION
handle them. In the case of smaller trees, sawing can be easily done
with a small portable saw and over half of the stems can be used
"in the round," i.e., without splitting.
In the aggregate, a great deal of Eucalyptus wood is being used
for fuel, the stump age value of plantations being cut for this purpose
varying with locality and market conditions from $1.50 to $4.00 a cord.
Grove owners can have wood cut and stacked on contract for $8.00 to
$12.00 per cord (12 to 16 inch stove-wood) and the price obtained per
cord for wood of this kind stacked in the grove varied from $10.00 to
Fig. 23. — These pieces of Blue Gum are 1% inches square by 6 feet long, cut
from a grove at Stony Point, Sonoma County. Blue Gum is suitable for the manu-
facture of insulator pins and other small turned articles. After being seasoned
for six to eight weeks in open piles these blanks are turned into insulator pins,
the product averaging about 2500 pins a cord. A stumpage price of $4.50 a
cord has been paid for 25-year-old groves used for this purpose.
$16.00 in 1923. Eucalyptus wood delivered to users in California
towns and cities costs from $18.00 to $24.00 a cord, the advance over
the grove price resulting from transportation and yard storage costs.
In many parts of the state Eucalyptus wood is sold in competition
with native fuel woods and the stumpage value must be decreased
accordingly if the wood is to be handled at all. For this reason a
good deal of Eucalyptus stumpage has been sold at about $1.00 a
cord and many contractors say that it cannot be handled at a profit
if it costs more than this. Some groves are situated in places so
remote from transportation or a market that the standing trees have
practically no value for fuel purposes.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 41
Charcoal. — Eucalyptus wood produces an excellent grade of char-
coal, probably better than that from most native California woods.
When produced in open earth kilns, about 1000 pounds of charcoal
per cord of wood is secured and the burning of a kiln takes about three
weeks (fig. 24). During this time it must be under almost constant
observation so that the fire will not break through the kiln and destroy
the wood entirely. Although there is a good market for charcoal, this
process of manufacture has been so expensive that makers of charcoal
have been unable to pay a much greater stumpage price for Eucalyptus
wood than it commands for fuel purposes. It seems probable that an
Fig. 24. — A pile of charcoal from 25 cords of JEucalyptus wood burned in an
earth kiln for 21 days. When handled in this way it produces about 1000
pounds of charcoal a cord.
increasing demand for charcoal may make the erection of retorts for
charcoal production feasible. These operate with much greater effi-
ciency and should make it possible for producers to pay a somewhat
higher stumpage price for the trees.
Insulator Pins made from California grown Blue Gum have been
used for several years by power companies and have proved to be very
satisfactory. One firm is manufacturing about 125,000 pins a year
from a 25-year-old Blue Gum grove in Sonoma County (fig. 23). The
stumpage value of trees for this purpose is about the same as for fuel
wood. The trees are sawn into billets, 1% inches square by 6 feet
in length and stacked in open piles in a shady place out of doors for
about six weeks to season. They are then taken to the turning machines
42 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
and made into the finished product. The small squares used in this
operation do not seem to check or warp unduly, as is usually the case
when pieces of larger size are sawn, and the losses due to such defects
are not unduly large. The pins are strong and sufficiently durable to
compare very favorably with high grade locust pins.
Lumber. — Very little lumber has been made from California Euca-
lyptus trees except in an experimental way. Most of the experiments
have been disappointing because of excessive checking and warping
of the boards during seasoning. This checking and warping is the
most serious obstacle in the utilization of California grown Euca-
lyptus of all species. In spite of the hardness of the wood and its
interlocking fibres, logs cut from trees 10 to 15 years old will often
split open from end to end after lying on the ground only a few weeks.
Lumber frequently has become so deformed during seasoning that its
original dimensions could scarcely be determined and the losses in
volume have usually amounted to about 50 per cent of the original
volume. Very probably this is due in large part to the extreme youth
of the trees which in spite of their size, are almost entirely made up of
sapwood. In Australia, Eucalyptus lumber is sawn from virgin forest
trees which are of unknown age, probably several hundred years old.
It may be that as California trees increase in age, the wood will be
less difficult to handle and may produce satisfactory lumber.
. Mr. J. T. Gillespie of San Jose was for several years engaged in
the manufacture of lumber from large Blue Gum trees cut in that
vicinity. The trees were mostly large, open-grown specimens over 35
years of age, and although there was considerable loss in volume due
to warping and checking, it was not nearly so great as has been the
rule with younger trees. These so-called "San Jose Blue Gums" were
probably grown from seed collected by Bishop Taylor in Victoria* or
New South Wales while much of the other Blue Gum in the state was
raised from Tasmanian seed, and Mr. H. D. Tiemann of the U. S.
Forest Service found during the course of dry kiln experiments carried
on at Berkeley (1912-14), that the wood was of decidedly better
quality than that produced by other California grown trees. Whether
this is due to a varietal difference in the trees, to their greater age,
or to the favorable site conditions under which they grew at San Jose,
has not been determined. Mr. Gillespie said that there was consider-
able variation in the straightness of grain and quality of wood between
individual trees and that checking and warping were much worse in
* Mr. Tiemann confirmed the visit of Bishop Taylor to Sydney and noted
that Victorian Blue Gum trees have smaller capsules and more scaly bark than
the Tasmanian trees.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 43
some. He also claimed that the time of year when the trees were cut
had considerable influence on the amount of checking in the product.
The lumber manufactured by him was seasoned in open sheds for about
two years before remanufacture and proved to be very satisfactory
for plow beams, wagon tongues and beds, hay-rake frames and teeth,
and for other purposes where strength and hardness are required.
A few pieces of furniture were made experimentally and were reason-
ably satisfactory, while some very good veneer was also produced in a
small way. During several years the Gillespie plant turned out a
large number of insulator pins annually but their manufacture was
discontinued because of low prices induced by competition of other
species and manufacturers.
Miscellaneous Uses. — The wood of California grown Eucalypts has
been used experimentally for toy parts, tool handles, paving blocks,
posts, piles and piling, but the severe checking and inability to hold
its form, coupled with the fact that the wood of young trees is not
durable when in contact with the soil, has prevented very widespread
use for these purposes. Species other than Blue Gum have grown so
slowly that few trees have reached a size large enough to be cut for
anything except firewood. Experiments with untreated Blue Gum
piles in salt water have shown that it is but little more resistant to
teredo attack than Douglas Fir or other native species commonly used
for piling.
Blue Gum and Manna Gum have been used for several years for
piling and rip-rap work along the Santa Ana River in Orange County,
but have not proven very durable in the moist soil along the river
banks. Blue Gum piles were used in the construction of a long cause-
way on the State Highway between Ventura and Santa Barbara in
1911. Most of these were driven in the sand along several miles of
ocean front and in this situation have given very good service. Sugar
Gum, Gray Gum and Red Gum are all more durable in the soil than
Blue Gum, but Red Gum is usually too crooked to make a satisfactory
pile and the other species have not been available in sufficient quanti-
ties to warrant the working up of a market for them. Sugar Gum was
the most durable of twelve species tested at the Santa Monica Forestry
Station as fence posts. The best posts were those split from trees
12 to 14 inches in diameter in which the heartwood was sound after
seven years in the ground but the sap wood had entirely rotted away.
Posts made from small trees of any of the species are mostly sap wood
and therefore very unsatisfactory, as they rot quickly and may usually
be easily pushed over after two to three years.
44
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
Eucalyptus Oil. — The United States imports annually from Aus-
tralia about 150,000 pounds of Eucalyptus oil, worth about $75,000.
This imported oil is made by distilling mixed lots of leaves of a number
of Australian species, most of which are not present in California. The
leaves of these species contain much larger quantities of oil than those
commonly planted in this country, and the oil is richer in certain
essential constituents. A number of attempts have been made to
produce a satisfactory oil from California grown trees, but apparently
the California oil cannot be refined to meet the U. S. pharmacopoea
Fig. 25. — An experimental steam distillation plant near Guadalupe for dis-
tilling oil from Eucalyptus leaves. The cost of making oil from the foliage of
thinned trees in 1920 was 60 cents a pound. The trees in the background are
13-year-old Blue Gums. The sprouts are two years old, from the stumps of
trees cut in thinnings.
standard except at a prohibitive cost. Tests at the U. S. Forest
Products Laboratory showed that oil from California Blue Gum trees
could be made to meet the U. S. P. requirements by suitable fractional
distillation ; but this process entailed the loss of from 35 to 45 per cent
of the crude oil.* The investigators felt that it might be possible with
an efficient distillation plant, to obtain an oil that would meet the
U. S. P. requirements without redistillation, by separating the crude
oil into several fractions as it is distilled from the leaves. Up to the
present time this has not been attempted, and it is doubtful if it
* Report by S. A. Mahood and D. E. Cable, "An Investigation of the Oil of
Eucalyptus globulus."
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 45
would be profitable, as the higher grade Australian oil can be laid
down in this country at practically the same price as it costs to make
the California crude oil.
The cost of producing crude oil at Guadalupe, San Luis Obispo
County, from trees cut in thinning the Brintnall Ranch groves during
1921, was 60 to 65 cents a pound (fig. 25). The prices quoted on
Australian oil at that time averaged about 10 cents a pound cheaper.
Those in charge of the work felt sure that, in connection with clear
cutting operations, the cost could be cut to approximately that of the
Australian product. Even so the California oil would be at a dis-
advantage unless it can be made to meet the U. S. P. specifications. Up
to the present time it has been used in only limited amounts in the
manufacture of unofficial medical preparations, boiler compound, soap,
and as a flotation oil. Further investigations are necessary to deter-
mine just what equipment and methods are required for the production
of a high grade California oil at a minimum cost.
Notes on Other Species
Mr. H. D. Tiemann who carried on the seasoning experiments, men-
tioned above, has recently returned from Australia where he carried
on seasoning experiments on the wood of mature trees, and was able to
observe carefully the growth of a large number of Eucalyptus species
under their natural condition, as well as methods of utilization in that
country. He remarks in a recent letter, "The trouble with the Cali-
fornia Eucalyptus is that almost invariably the wrong species have
been planted, ' ' and later suggests that the following species are worthy
of trial because of the value of their wood and their probable suitability
to California conditions.
Woollybutt (E. delegatensis) . Very hardy and stands freezing
winters.
Jarrah (E '. marginata) .* Not frost hardy.
Spotted Gum (E. maculata) .* Not frost hardy.
Ironbark (E. paniculata) .*
White Stringybark (E. eugenioides)*
Flooded Gum or Sydney Blue Gum (E. saligna). Not frost
hardy.
Victorian Mountain Ash (E. regnans).
Victorian Grey Box (E. hemiphloia) *
Those marked (*) in the above list have wood which is very hard
and durable. The others produce lumber of good quality in Australia
although it is not so hard nor so durable in contact with the soil.
46 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
Woollybutt and Mountain Ash produce lumber which is excellent for
general building, flooring, furniture and similar uses. The first of
these is the most hardy of any Eucalyptus species in Australia.
Reference to the preceding tables will show that several of the
suggested species have been planted in California on a small scale, but
that their growth has been much slower than that of Blue Gum. The
following observations may be made with regard to these species :
Jarrah (E. marginata) . — There are probably not over two or three
trees of this species growing in California. The one at Santa Monica
is a scrub about fifteen feet high after 25 years of growth.
Woollybutt (E. delegatensis). — This species is not present in the
collections at Santa Monica or Del Rosa, and is probably not growing
any where in the state.
Spotted Gum (E. maculata). — This species and its variety, the
Lemon-scented Gum (E. maculata citriodora) are beautiful ornamental
trees and are growing as lawn specimens in several sections of the
state (fig. 20). Spotted Gum has grown vigorously at Santa Monica,
averaging 5.8 inches d.b.h. and 34 feet in height in 16 years, and its
beautifully mottled bark makes it conspicuous among all of the asso-
ciated trees. A beautiful group of Lemon-scented Gum is growing on
the Ward estate in Santa Barbara, and a few of these trees have per-
sisted in the foothill plantations on the Bixby Ranch in Orange County,
but in the latter situation they have made very slow growth. A few
trees of the species and of the variety are present in the San Francisco
Bay region but neither is very frost hardy, although a Spotted Gum
seedling survived the unusually cold weather during the winters of
1921 and 1922 in a sheltered spot in Berkeley, without injury.
Ironbark (E. panicidata) . — Twenty-two trees of this species on the
upper mesa at the Santa Monica station have made fair growth in
diameter but have lagged in height growth. In the mixed planting,
two trees 27 years old average 9 inches d.b.h. and 49 feet in height.
Several trees on the driest site have died during periods of extreme
drought. Elsewhere in the state this species is rare.
Flooded Gum (E. saligna) is a tree of upright habit and good form
in California. Its growth at Livermore, Alameda County, and at
Santa Monica, are shown in the tables. It will undoubtedly do well in
frost free situations where adequate soil moisture is available.
White Stringybark (E. eugenioides). — The few trees of this species
at Santa Monica are tall, straight and cylindrical; they have grown
with moderate rapidity and seem well suited to the conditions. A
single seedling in the experimental plot on the University campus at
Berkeley has shown marked rapidity of growth, and has not been
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 47
injured by frost during three winters. The species has narrow, slender
leaves; yellow-brown, fibrous bark and a dark reddish tinge to its
graceful foliage which makes it unusually ornamental.
Victorian Mountain Ash (E. regnans). — This species is probably
not present in California unless the trees which have been planted
under the name of E. amygdalina may be of this species. There has
been a good deal of confusion in nomenclature of these trees even in
Australia and it has not been possible to determine whether the Cali-
fornia trees are really E. regnans, or the tree now known as E. amyg-
dalina in Australia which goes under the common name of Peppermint.
The trees observed in California at Santa Monica, Chico, and in San
Benito County had all been more or less severely injured by frost and
were of scrubby form in consequence. As the true E. regnans is quite
frost hardy in Australia, the California trees are probably the other
species, which is smaller and less satisfactory.
Victorian Grey Box (E. hemiphloia). — Very few trees of this
species have been tried in California. Four trees are growing at Santa
Monica which, though apparently thrifty, are crooked and have made
indifferent growth in height.
All of the above species deserve further trial in California because
of the high quality of their wood, but it seems certain that they will
all grow more slowly than the species which have thus far been com-
monly planted. With the possible exception of E. delegatensis and
E. regnans these species will not succeed except in comparatively frost
free situations.
Mr. Tiemann in a recent letter makes the following comments on
the species most commonly planted in California and urges further
trial of the above mentioned more valuable trees.
Bine Gum (E. globulus). — "It makes excellent firewood and small
articles such as insulator pins, but is not suitable for lumber at an
age less than 75 to 100 years. It does not yield as good timber as many
other species. ' '
Red Gum (E. rostrata). — "A durable wood, but a tree of poor
form."
Gray Gum (E. tereticornis) . — "Probably a better tree than ros-
trata on account of its better shape. ' '
Manna Gum (E. viminalis). — "In Victoria it is a good sized tree
but the lumber is certainly inferior. I would not consider it at all."
Messmate Stringybark (E. obliqua). — "It grows with regnans and
in stunted form almost to the tree limit, where it endures severe cold
and prolonged winters. The wood is certainly inferior as it is full of
gum pockets."
48 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
SUMMARY
Blue Gum makes the most rapid growth of any species of Euca-
lyptus thus far planted in California. It is best suited to the condi-
tions obtaining near the coast but succeeds fairly well in the interior
valleys and in southern California if adequate soil moisture is present.
On the basis of 67 groves measured, the mean annual growth is 271
solid cubic feet per acre, which equals 3.02 standard cords. The
highest volume growth recorded was in the case of an 8-year-old grove
growing on very fertile silt swampy land in Alameda County. The
spacing here was 5 by 5 feet, the trees averaging when measured 5.8
inches d.b.h. and 60 feet high, the mean annual growth had been
736 cubic feet or 8.17 standard cords per acre. The best grove has
averaged between 450 and 550 cubic feet per acre per annum, while
several growing on poor, sandy, exposed or dry sites have grown at a
rate less than 90 cubic feet per acre per annum.
A tentative yield table for Blue Gum for good, medium and poor
sites is given ; the sites having been determined according to the height
method. This shows the yields per acre of ten-year plantations on the
three sites to be as follows :
Site 1—6100 cu. ft., Site 11—3400 cu. ft., Site III— 2050 cu ft.
Groves of Red Gum and Gray Gum, two very similar species, have
averaged about 100 cubic feet volume growth per acre per year —
approximately one standard cord. The Red Gum is unsatisfactory
because of its crooked habit of growth. Both species are more drought
resistant than Blue Gum and produce wood which is more durable in
the soil.
Sugar Gum is very drought resistant but subject to injury by frost,
and so is best suited to the climatic conditions of southern California.
The 17 groves measured made an average mean annual growth of 110
cubic feet, or 1.22 cords per acre.
Individual trees of Manna Gum have made excellent growth in
the Sacramento Valley region, but none of them are growing in
plantations.
Figures on the growth of a large number of other species are given
in tabular form. Some of these are growing in plantations while others
are to be found in California only as individual specimens. The
growth requirements and characteristics of several of the more import-
ant of these trees, when growing under Australian conditions, are
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 49
given for comparison. The most valuable of these Australian species
of Eucalyptus are apparently poorly suited to California conditions
and will undoubtedly make slower volume growth than the species
which have been so extensively planted.
The wood of California grown Eucalyptus has been used for fuel,
charcoal, insulator pins and other small turned articles. Some lumber
has been made experimentally but has not been satisfactory because of
excessive checking and warping of the wood during seasoning. Oil
has been distilled experimentally from the leaves but thus far, has
not come up to the U. S. P. requirements. The value of standing
Eucalyptus trees has varied from $1.00 to about $4.00 a cord, accord-
ing to the location and character of the trees, and is about the same
for fuel, charcoal or insulator pins.
APPENDIX I
METHOD OF TAKING FIELD MEASUKEMENTS
Virtually all of the groves measured were planted according to a
very accurately laid out rectangular system (usually the planting
area was marked out into squares or rectangles after plowing) and
in each sample grove, one or more rows running through representative
portions were selected for measurement. The diameter breast high of
each surviving tree in such rows was measured with a steel diameter
tape and recorded in its proper place on the field sheet. All blank
spaces or scrubby trees in the row were also recorded in their proper
order, the total number of planting spaces being used to obtain the
per centage of survival and therefrom the acre volume. Heights were
measured with the Faustmann hypsometer, the observer standing a
definite number of planting spaces distant from each tree as it was
measured. Often it was impossible to measure the height of each tree
for which a diameter measurement was taken, but enough heights were
obtained to enable the drawing of a diameter-height curve for each
grove from which the heights of the other trees was obtained. Fre-
quently groves were visited in connection with work on other projects,
and because of insufficient time, the number of trees measured was
unavoidably small. In groves of any considerable size an attempt was
made to measure from seventy-five to one hundred trees.
As detailed a history as possible for each plantation was secured
from the owner or from a resident of the locality. This included such
points as: date of planting, replacement work, early cultivation and
50 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
care. Where groves were being cut, data on character of product, cost
of manufacture, cost of delivery, sale value of product and approxi-
mate yield per acre were secured.
The measurement of one or more rows through a plantation is
believed to give a much better average of the grove as a whole than
the measurement of one or more circular or rectangular sample plots.
Because of the generally accurate rectangular spacing, the calculation
of volume per acre by the sample row method is just as accurate and
much more rapid than by the use of isolated sample plots. Also, if
several soil or slope conditions are present in the plantation, it is
possible to determine the influence of each by careful selection of rows
to be measured.
CALCULATION OF VOLUME
As a basis for volume calculations in this study, a total of sixty-
eight felled Eucalyptus globulus trees were measured in 1917 in a
grove in Reidy Canyon, near Escondido, San Diego County. Taper
measurements were made at 10 foot intervals along the stem of each
tree with the diameter tape, and its solid cubic contents, including
bark, down to 2 inches in the top were calculated by the Smalian
method. The d.b.h. form factor* was then computed for each tree and
the average form factor for each inch diameter class was obtained. No
definite relation between diameter and form factor could be detected
when the above values were plotted on cross section paper. Therefore
the average form factor of the sixty-eight trees (FF. = .442) was
used in all of the original calculations of volume.
Few opportunities for further taper measurements presented them-
selves until early in 1923, when an additional number of felled trees
were measured. About the same time a set of old taper measurements
of 23 Blue Gum trees was found in the files of the State Forester and
used in the calculations. The total number thus available (123) cov-
ered a much wider range of diameter than the original sixty-eight trees
and a definite decrease in ff. with increase in diameter was noted when
the values were plotted. The curved average form factors of the 123
trees is shown in Table A.
* Form Factor (written ft0.) is a decimal expressing the relation between the
solid cubic contents of a tree and the contents of a cylinder of the same
diameter and total height. The d.b.h. form factor method of obtaining volume
is expressed as follows:
V = B H X ff . in which
V = volume of tree in cubic feet including bark.
B = square foot area of a circle of the same diameter as the breast high
measured.
H = total height of tree in feet,
ff. = form factor.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 51
TABLE A
Table of Form Factors for Eucalyptus Globulus
d. b. h., inches
Form factor
B. H. area x ff.
for calculating volume
2
.480
0.0105
3
.472
0.0232
4
.466
0.0406
5
.458
0.0623
6
.451
0.088
7
.444
0.118
8
.436
0.152
9
.428
0.189
10
.420
0.229
11
.413
0.272
12
.406
0.318
13
.400
0.369
14
.393
0.420
15
.388
0.476
16
.381
0.532
17
.374
0.590
18
.368
0.650
19
.361
0.710
20
.354
0.775
21
.347
0.835
22
.340
0.916
23
.333
0.965
24
.325
1.022
25
.318
1.083
26
.311
1.148
27
.303
1.206
28
.294
1.258
29
.288
1.320
30
.280
1.424
Based on taper measurements at 10 ft. intervals, of 123 felled trees. Stumps
average 1 ft. in height not included. Volume computed down to 2 in. at the
top including bark.
_ „ Vol. of stem
Form factor =— ;
Breast ht. area X total ht.
Column three is given for convenience in computing volumes. After d.b.h.
and height have been measured, it is only necessary to multiply the figure given
in this column opposite the d.b.h. class by the total height in order to obtain
the volume in cubic feet. As this is an average figure, it should not be con-
sidered accurate for single trees.
Inasmuch as virtually all of the computation work had been com-
pleted with the use of the flat average ff. .442 for all diameters before
the above additional data were available, it was necessary to make
percentage corrections of volume per acre based on the average
diameter of trees in each grove. . No correction was made for groves
averaging 7 inches in diameter, but for those which averaged over or
under 7 inches d.b.h. the volume per acre was lowered or raised accord-
ing to the relation the ff. shown in Table 1 bore to the ff. .442. For
52 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
example, the volume of a grove averaging 4 inches d.b.h. was increased
5.3 per cent, while the volume of a grove averaging 10 inches was
decreased 5 per cent. In a majority of cases the percentage changes
were so small as to make only a very slight difference in the total
cubic foot volume per acre, and practically no change in the calculated
mean annual growth per acre. While some objection may be raised
against the use of this procedure on mathematical grounds, it was the
only method possible without repeating a prohibitively large amount
of calculative work, and it is felt that no appreciable error has been
introduced by the use of these percentage corrections.
APPENDIX II
SITE CLASSIFICATION— Eucalyptus globulus
In order to arrive at a somewhat more exact estimate of the quality
of various localities for growing Blue Gum, the various groves of this
species have been separated into three site classes according to the
height method, the procedure being as follows:
(1) Enough of the tallest trees to make 10 per cent of the number
measured in each grove were averaged and the points plotted on cross
section paper using height over age. Some groves in which overcrowd-
ing had interfered with height growth, were omitted from the calcula-
tions and a number of groves measured by L. Margolin* in 1910 were
included. In all 71 groves were used.
(2) An average age-height curve was drawn, and maximum and
minimum age-height curves were drawn to harmonize with the average.
The zone between the maximum and minimum curves was then arbi-
trarily divided into three zones by similarly harmonized curves. These
three zones are called Sites I, II, and III, or Good, Medium, and Poor.
The site classification for each grove is indicated by the zone within
which its age-height point, as plotted, falls.
(3) The cubic foot volumes per acre for all of the groves in each
site class were plotted, using volume over age, and the points smoothed
off by a curve, thus showing the average volume per acre.
The following table shows the values read from the harmonized
curves in (2) above:
* Yield from Eucalyptus Plantations in California. Bull. 1, State Board of
Forestry, 1910.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 53
TABLE B
Site Classification — Eucalyptus globulus
Height Method
Based on measurement of 71 California plantations
Average height
10% best trees
Heights
Age, years
Site III below
Site II
Site I above
Feet
Feet
Feet
Feet
5
46.5
41
41-53
53
10
78.5
70
70-90
90
15
103.0
92
92-119
119
20
114.0
102
102-133
133
25
121.0
108
108-139
139
30
125.5
112
112-145
145
When classified according to this method, the 71 groves used in the
calculations appear in the following proportions :
Site I, 19.7%
Site II, 42.2%
Site III, 38.1%
The groves in each site class were grouped as follows for plotting
of volume over age. Margolin's volume figures were not included
because the form factor used in his calculations was not stated.
TABLE C
Grouping of Eucalyptus globulus Groves for Yield Calculations
site I
Age class
Number of groves
Average age
Average volume, cu
ft.
Years
Years
6
1
6
1,000
7
2
7
3,030
8
1
8
5,889
11
1
11
6,690
23
1
23
12,585
36
1
36K
17,700
SITE II
Years
Years
2
1
2
103
4
1
4
850
6
4
5.6
1,020
7
6
7
1,750
8
3
8.1
2,686
10
3
9.6
3,038
11
1
11
5,012
54
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
SITE III
Years
Years
3
1
3
113
4
1
4
119
6
3
6
1,176
7
6
7
1,342
8
3
8
1,018
9
6
9
1,561
10
2
9.7
2,520
14
1
14
1,823
20
1
20
4,130
The curved average of these values for each site class is shown in
Table 2. The curves were extended by inspection to twenty years but
cannot be considered very accurate beyond fifteen years because of
insufficient data. The volumes given are in solid cubic feet, including
bark; and no attempt has been made to convert the figures into the
board-foot unit. Trees less than twenty years of age are valuable
principally for cordwood, and even the manufacturers of small turned
articles such as insulator pins, usually purchase the stump age by the
cord. Very little Eucalyptus lumber has been sawn except in an
experimental way, and no satisfactory boards have been produced from
such young trees.
APPENDIX III
BAISING EUCALYPTUS FEOM SEED
The planting of large tracts of Eucalyptus trees for growing timber
has practically ceased during the last few years, but there is an increas-
ing interest on the part of farmers and ranch owners in the planting
of these trees for fuel, windbreaks, prevention of erosion along banks
of gulleys, shade for cattle, and beautification of the home grounds.
Seedlings of the commoner species can usually be procured from the
larger nurseries, but it is often impossible to obtain trees of the rarer
varieties which may seem most desirable for the existing conditions.
Trees supplied by some nurseries are often kept too long in small pots,
which cramps the root system and makes the planting stock unsatis-
factory. The following directions, if carefully followed, will enable
anyone to raise enough trees for a windbreak or specimen plantation
with very little trouble or expense.
Sowing the Seed. — The commonest method for propagating Euca-
lyptus is to sow the seed in seed boxes about 18 inches square and 4
inches deep, which have been filled almost to the top with light, sandy
loam soil. The soil should be screened to remove all pebbles and lumps
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 55
and be well firmed in the boxes before the seeds are scattered on the
smooth surface. Enough seeds to produce from 200 to 400 seedlings
to the box may be sown broadcast over the soil and covered with not
more than one-eighth inch of pure sand or clean, fine sawdust. The
boxes are then placed in a shady place, preferably under a lath house
until germination is complete. Germination should take place within
two or three weeks after sowing, during which time careful attention
to soil moisture conditions should be given. As damping-off fungi
sometimes cause serious loss?s during the germination period a mini-
mum amount of water should be applied. The use of sterile soil is
Fig. 26. — One type of seed bed used successfully in San Diego County in
growing Sugar Gum and Gray Gum seedlings. The sides are burlap and the
top is of cotton cloth. Damping-off loss has been cut to a minimum by with-
holding water for the first ten days.
advised and careful attention to proper aeration of the boxes should
be given. If damping-off starts in the boxes it may often be checked
by sprinkling them with a 10 per cent solution of Sulphurated Potassa
(Liver of Sulfur).
Seedlings may be raised in standard out-of-door seed beds (fig. 26)
with board sides and screen covers instead of seed boxes, in which case
a light cotton cloth cover is advisable instead of the regulation screen.
This will check evaporation and the beds will require less watering.
With some soil conditions it has been found advisable to sprinkle the
beds thoroughly after sowing, cover tightly with the cloth, and refrain
from watering until after germination is in full progress (about 14
days) . With this method the top of the soil dries out and the spread
56 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIMENT STATION
of fungous disease is not so apt to occur. The beds or boxes must be
carefully watched to see that they do not become so dry as to cause the
death of the seedlings.
The best time to sow Eucalyptus seed is from May to July but may
vary considerably with different species. The influence of local
climate on rate of growth is the controlling factor. Some slow-growing
species must be sown earlier, and a few of the more quick-growing may
safely be sown in August.
Transplanting. — The roots of Eucalyptus seedlings are so suscepti-
ble to drying out that they cannot be successfully planted out in the
field unless the roots are enclosed in a ball of earth. Seedlings must
therefore be removed from the boxes or seed beds when they are from
2!/2 to 4 inches high and placed in separate tar paper pots or per-
forated cans in which they are left when set in the plantation. The
work of placing them in pots or cans is most conveniently done with a
small trowel and the root system should be disturbed as little as pos-
sible in the process. If plants are left too long in the seed boxes or
beds the root system will suffer injury during the transplanting from
which they rarely recover. After potting, the young trees should be
given careful watering and partial shade for about a month, after
which they may gradually be hardened so that they will stand field
conditions.
Planting. — Planting should be done about the end of the rainy
season when all danger from frost is past and when the trees are about
five to eight months old from seed. Some plantations have been
successfully started in November or December, but young seedlings are
very susceptible to damage by frost and it is rarely advisable to plant
so early in the season. Land which is not too steep should be plowed
and cultivated for several months before the trees are planted. It is
an advantage to grow a crop on the land the year before planting. On
steep sites each tree is set in the center of a space about 18 inches
across from which sod and weeds have been removed and the soil
thoroughly worked up with a mattock.
The pot or can containing the tree is set directly in the ground
without disturbing the soil or root system of the seedling. Where tin
cans are used it is necessary to cut them down one side and across the
bottom with a pair of tin snips in order that they may not interfere
with the growth of the tree before they rot away in the soil. The pot
or can should be set well into the soil so that the root growth may be
able to keep ahead of the drying out of the upper layers of ground
during the summer season. After pressing the earth firmly about the
tree and container, a mulch of finely pulverized soil should be scattered
over the top to diminish evaporation.
Bulletin 3S0] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 57
Cultivation. — Most of the groves measured were given two thorough
cultivations during the first year. In many groves this was continued
through the second growing season. On slopes where horse or tractor
cultivation is not possible it is essential that grass and weeds be kept
away from the base of each young tree by cultivating a space about
two feet square with a grub hoe. This not only relieves the tree from
competition with grass and weeds for light and soil moisture, but
largely prevents girdling of the trees by mice. In uncultivated planta-
tions this girdling has been a serious problem, sometimes resulting in
the loss of 75 per cent of the trees (fig. 27).
Spacing. — With rapid growing species on good sites, a rectangular
spacing of 8 by 8 feet (680 per acre) or wider has given good results.
On poorer sites or when using slower growing species or when the sur-
vival per cent is apt to be low, trees may be spaced 7 by 7 or even 6 by
6 feet (890 and 1210 per acre). For cordwood production on a short
rotation a spacing of 7 by 7 feet will be satisfactory on most sites.
To find the number of trees per acre divide 43,560 by the product
of planting distances in feet.
43 560
With an 8 by 10 foot spacing — ^r — = 544 trees.
Cost of Planting. — During the period of extensive Eucalyptus
planting, from 1908 to 1912, many groves were set out and cared for
for two years at a cost of $25 to $40 per acre exclusive of the cost of
the land. Labor costs at that time were considerably lower than at
present so that the same work today would probably cost from $45 to
$60 per acre. Several owners of well kept groves have told me that
the cost of land, planting and cultivation, plus carrying charges, have
totaled approximately $100 per acre by the end of ten years. Some
groves have cost more than this but it is probably about an average
figure for large plantations under reasonably good conditions of soil
and management. Therefore, in order to yield a profit, the stumpage
value of a Eucalyptus plantation at the end of ten years must be at
least approximately $100 per acre. A grove which has grown at the
rate of four cords per acre per year must have a stumpage value of
$2.50 per cord in order to pay for itself ; while on sites where the rate
of growth is slower, the stumpage value must be proportionately
higher.
The ranch owner who sets out Eucalyptus trees in a windbreak or
along a steep or unused section of good land situated near a good cord-
wood market, is in a much more favorable position to secure satis-
factory returns than the owner of a larger plantation situated on
58 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — EXPERIMENT STATION
inferior land or farther from a good market. In the first case the
planting and cultivation can be done in connection with regular farm
work and will be less expensive ; growth will be faster and the stumpage
value will be higher because transportation costs are not so great.
A windbreak planting, by the time it is ready to cut, has returned
much of the original cost in the protection it has given to adjacent
crops, which may properly be taken into consideration in computing
its value to the farm. Moreover, it can usually be cut one row at a
time with intervals of a year or two between cuts, so that its value as
a wind-shield is not impaired, but is actually improved because of the
dense growth of young sprouts which spring up after each cutting,
renewing the wind mantle near the ground where it is most apt to be
impaired by the dropping of branches from the larger trees.
Protection of Plantations. — The need of early cultivation or
removal of grass and weeds from around the young trees has been
mentioned above as a protection from girdling by rodents, (fig. 27).
It is quite as important to keep the young plantation clean as a pro-
tection against fire. A bad fire during the early life of a Eucalyptus
grove may kill most of the trees and ruin the plantation. As the trees
increase in age, leaves, twigs and strips of bark collect on the ground
and intensify the danger of a fire spreading through the grove. To
remove this litter is usually not feasible nor is it advisable as it retards
evaporation from the soil. It should however be recognized as a source
of danger. Adequate measures to prevent the starting of fires within
the grove should be taken each year well in advance of the danger
season. A well equipped and energetic rural fire company is the best
insurance against extensive damage by fire and owners of Eucalyptus
plantations should be very active in their support of such an organiza-
tion. Owing to the extremely inflammable nature of Eucalyptus leaves
and bark, a fire in hot dry weather if it gets a good start is apt to be
very difficult to extinguish before very serious damage is done. Fire
in June, 1920, seriously injured over 500 acres of plantations in San
Luis Obispo County, and the Arrowhead fire of October, 1922, com-
pletely destroyed all of the experimental plantations of the U. S. Forest
Service near Del Rosa, San Bernardino County. (See fig. 19).
Cattle and horses should be rigidly excluded from plantations until
the trees are large enough to be safe from being trampled or injured
by the animals. Later, the grove may well be lightly grazed but much
trampling of the soil in wet weather should be guarded against.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 59
Several fungi are known to attack Eucalyptus in California planta-
tions, but only where heartwood has been exposed because of injury
to the cambium layer by fire or some mechanical cause. Trees so
infected should be removed from the plantation as soon as possible, as
they act as sources of infection for other trees.
Fig. 27. — This tree has been girdled by mice but is still alive and has pro-
duced two sprouts below the point of injury. Girdling by mice has caused the
death of large numbers of eucalyptus trees in some plantations. In one Sonoma
County grove over 75 per cent of the trees died from this cause. The remedy
is clean cultivation around the trees for the first three years.
BULLETIN 380] GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS IN CALIFORNIA PLANTATIONS 61
REFERENCES ON EUCALYPTUS TREES IN THE UNITED STATES
Eucalytus. Abbot Kinney, Baumgardt & Co., Los Angeles, Calif., 1895.
Eucalypts Cultivated in the United States. A. J. McClatchie, U. S. D. A.
Bureau of Forestry, Bulletin 35, 1902.
A Handbook for Eucalyptus Planters. G. B. Lull, Calif. State Board of
Forestry, Circular 2, 1907.
The Growing of Eucalypts, with detailed bibliography. F. G. Plummer, Pro-
ceedings Soc. American Foresters, vol. V, p. 109, 1907.
Forest Planting Leaflet — Eucalypts. U. S. D. A. Forest Service, Circular 59,
1907.
Eucalyptus in California. N. D. Ingham, Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bulletin 196,
1908.
Eucalyptus; Its History, Growth and Utilization. C. H. Sellers, A. J. Johnston
Co., Sacramento, Calif., 1910.
A Cultura do Eucalyptos nos Estados Unidos. E. Navarro de Andrade, Roth-
schild & Co., Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1910.
Yield from Eucalyptus Plantations in California. L. Margolin, Calif. State
Board of Forestry, Bulletin 1, 19101.
Utilization of California Eucalypts. H. S. Betts and C. Stowell Smith, U. S.
D. A. Forest Service, Circular 179, 1910.
Tolerance of Eucalyptus for Alkali. R. H. Loughridge, Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta.
Bulletin 225, 1911.
The Eucalyptus in Texas. J. H. Arbenz, Austin Printing Co., Austin, Texas,
1911.
Eucalypts in Florida. R. Zon and J. M. Briscoe, U. S. D. A. Forest Service,
Bulletin 87, 1911.
• Yield and Returns of Blue Gum in California. T. D. Woodbury, U. S. D. A.
Forest Service, Circular 210, 1912.
Eucalyptus Lumber — Abstract of U. S. Forest Products. Laboratory Report.
H. D. Tiemann, The Hardwood Record, Chicago, Sept. 25 and Oct. 10, 1913.
Investigations on the Oil of Eucalyptus Globulus of California. C. E. Burke
and C. C. Scalione, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 7,
p. 206, 1915.
Relative Frost Resistance of Eucalyptus in Southern California. E. N. Munns,
Journal of Forestry, vol. 16, p. 412, 1918.
Key for Identification of California Eucalypts. H. M. Hall, in Encyclopedia
of American Horticulture. Bailey.
An Investigation of the Oil of Eucalyptus Globulus from California. U. S. D. A.
Forest Products Laboratory. Mss. by S. A. Mahood and D. E. Cable, 1920'.
High Temperatures and Eucalypts. E. N. Munns, Jour, of Forestry, vol. 19,
p. 25, 1921.
Key to Eucalypts Grown in California. Mss. by Eric Walther. Files of Cali-
fornia Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, 1924.
STATION PUBLICATIONS AVAILABLE FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION
BULLETINS
No. No.
253. Irrigation and Soil Conditions in the 346.
Sierra Nevada Foothills, California. 347.
261. Melazuma of the Walnut, "Juglans
regia." 348.
262. Citrus Diseases of Florida and Cuba 349.
Compared with Those of California.
263. Size Grades for Ripe Olives. 350.
268. Growing and Grafting Olive Seedlings. 351.
273. Preliminary Report on Kearney Vine- 352.
yard Experimental Drain.
275. The Cultivation of Belladonna in Cali- 353.
fornia. 354.
276. The Pomegranate. 357.
277. Sudan Grass
278. Grain Sorghums.
279. Irrigation of Rice in California. 358.
280. Irrigation of Alfalfa in the Sacramento
Valley. 359.
283. The Olive Insects of California. 360.
285. The Milk Goat in California.
286. Commercial Fertilizers. 361.
287. Vinegar from Waste Fruits.
294. Bean Culture in California. 362.
298. Seedless Raisin Grapes. 363.
304. A Study of the Effects of Freezes on
Citrus in California. 364.
310. Plum Pollination.
312. Mariout Barley. 366.
813. Pruning Young Deciduous Fruit Trees.
317. Selections of Stocks in Citrus Propa- 367.
gation.
319. Caprifigs and Caprification. 368.
321. Commercial Production of Grape Syrup.
324. Storage of Perishable Fruit at Freezing 369.
Temperatures. 370.
325. Rice Irrigation Measurements and Ex- 371.
periments in Sacramento Valley,
1914-1919. 372.
328. Prune Growing in California.
331. Phylloxera-Resistant Stocks. 373.
334. Preliminary Volume Tables for Second- 374.
Growth Redwood.
335. Cocoanut Meal as a Feed for Dairy
Cows and Other Livestock. 375.
336. The Preparation of Nicotine Dust as
an Insecticide. 376.
339. The Relative Cost of Making Logs from
Small and Large Timber. 377.
340. Control of the Pocket Gopher in Cali- 378.
fornia.
343. Cheese Pests and Their Control.
344. Cold Storage as an Aid to the Market-
ing of Plums.
Almond Pollination.
The Control of Red Spiders in Decidu-
ous Orchards.
Pruning Young Olive Trees.
A Study of Sidedraft and Tractor
Hitches.
Agriculture in Cut-over Redwood Lands.
California State Dairy Cow Competition.
Further Experiments in Plum Pollina
tion.
Bovine Infectious Abortion.
Results of Rice Experiments in 1922.
A Self-mixing Dusting Machine for
Applying Dry Insecticides and
Fungicides.
Black Measles, Water Berries, and
Related Vine Troubles.
Fruit Beverage Investigations.
Gum Diseases of Citrus Trees in Cali-
fornia.
Preliminary Yield Tables for Second
Growth Redwood.
Dust and the Tractor Engine.
The Pruning of Citrus Trees in Cali-
fornia.
Fungicidal Dusts for the Control of
Bunt.
Turkish Tobacco Culture, Curing and
Marketing.
Methods of Harvesting and Irrigation
in Relation to Mouldy Walnuts.
Bacterial Decomposition of Olives dur-
ing Pickling.
Comparison of Woods for Butter Boxes.
Browning of Yellow Newtown Apples.
The Relative Cost of Yarding Small
and Large Timber.
The Cost of Producing Market Milk and
Butterfat on 246 California Dairies.
Pear Pollination.
A Survey of Orchard Practices in the
Citrus Industry of Southern Cali-
fornia.
Results of Rice Experiments at Cor-
tena, 1923.
Sun-Drying and Dehydration of Wal-
nuts.
The Cold Storage of Pears.
Studies on the Nutritional Disease of
Poultry Caused by Vitamin A De-
ficiency.
CIRCULARS
No.
70
Observations on the Status of Corn
Growing in California.
87. Alfalfa.
111. The Use of Lime and Gypsum on Cali-
fornia Soils.
113. Correspondence Courses in Agriculture.
117. The Selection and Cost of a Small
Pumping Plant.
127. House Fumigation.
129. The Control of Citrus Insects.
136. Mtlilotus indica as a Green-Manure
Crop for California.
144. Oidium or Powdery Mildew of the Vine.
151. Feeding and Management of Hogs.
152. Some Observations on the Bulk Hand-
ling of Grain in California.
154. Irrigation Practice in Growing Small
Fruit in California.
No.
155. Bovine Tuberculosis.
157. Control of the Pear Scab.
160. Lettuce Growing in California.
161. Potatoes in California.
164. Small Fruit Culture in California.
165. Fundamentals of Sugar Beet Culture
under California Conditions.
166. The County Farm Bureau.
167. Feeding Stuffs of Minor Importance.
170. Fertilizing California Soils for the 1918
Crop.
172. Wheat Culture.
173. The Construction of the Wood-Hoop
Silo.
174. Farm Drainage Methods.
178. The Packing of Apples in California.
179. Factors of Importance in Producing
Milk of Low Bacterial Count.
CIRCULARS — (Continued)
No.
184.
190.
193.
198.
199.
202.
203.
205.
208.
209.
210.
212.
214.
215.
217.
219.
220.
228.
230.
231.
232.
233.
234.
235.
236.
237.
238.
239.
240.
241.
242.
243.
244.
No.
A Flock of Sheep on the Farm. 245.
Agriculture Clubs in California. 247.
A Study of Farm Labor in California. 248.
Syrup from Sweet Sorghum.
Onion Growing in California. 249.
County Organizations for Rural Fire 250.
Control.
Peat as a Manure Substitute. 251.
Blackleg.
Summary of the Annual Reports of the
Farm Advisors of California. 252.
The Function of the Farm Bureau. 253.
Suggestions to the Settler in California. 254.
Salvaging Rain-Damaged Prunes.
Seed Treatment for the Prevention of 255.
Cereal Smuts.
Feeding Dairy Cows in California. 256.
Methods for Marketing Vegetables in 257.
California. 258.
The Present Status of Alkali. 259.
Unfermented Fruit Juices. 260.
Vineyard Irrigation in Arid Climates.
Testing Milk, Cream, and Skim Milk 261.
for Butterfat. 262.
The Home Vineyard. 263.
Harvesting and Handling California 264.
Cherries for Eastern Shipment.
Artificial Incubation. 265.
Winter Injury to Young Walnut Trees 266.
during 1921-22.
Soil Analysis and Soil and Plant Inter- 267.
relations.
The Common Hawks and Owls of Cali- 268.
fornia from the Standpoint of the
Rancher. 269.
Directions for the Tanning and Dress- 270.
of Furs. 271.
The Apricot in California. 272.
Harvesting and Handling Apricots and
Plums for Eastern Shipment. 273.
Harvesting and Handling Pears for 275.
Eastern Shipment.
Harvesting and Handling Peaches for 276.
Eastern Shipment. 277.
Poultry Feeding.
Marmalade Juice and Jelly Juice from 278.
Citrus Fruits.
Central Wire Bracing for Fruit Trees.
Vine Pruning Systems.
Colonization and Rural Development.
Some Common Errors in Vine Pruning
and Their Remedies.
Replacing Missing Vines.
Measurement of Irrigation Water on
the Farm.
Recommendations Concerning the Com-
mon Diseases and Parasites of
Poultry in California.
Supports for Vines.
Vineyard Plans.
The Use of Artificial Light to Increase
Winter Egg Production.
Leguminous Plants as Organic Fertil-
izer in California Agriculture.
The Control of Wild Morning Glory.
The Small- Seeded Horse Bean.
Thinning Deciduous Fruits.
Pear By-products.
A Selected List of References Relating
to Irrigation in California.
Sewing Grain Sacks.
Cabbage Growing in California.
Tomato Production in California.
Preliminary Essentials to Bovine Tuber-
culosis Control.
Plant Disease and Pest Control.
Analyzing the Citrus Orchard by Means
of Simple Tree Records.
The Tendency of Tractors to Rise in
Front; Causes and Remedies.
Inexpensive Lavor-saving Poultry Ap-
pliances.
An Orchard Brush Burner.
A Farm Septic Tank.
Brooding Chicks Artificially.
California Farm Tenancy and Methods
of Leasing.
Saving the Gophered Citrus Tree.
Marketable California Decorative
Greens.
Home Canning.
Head, Cane, and Cordon Pruning of
Vines.
Olive Pickling in Mediterranean Coun-
tries.
The publications listed above may be had by addressing
College of Agriculture,
University of California,
Berkeley, California.
10m-2,*25
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11