Skip to main content

Full text of "Hearings relating to revision of H.R. 9120 and H.R. 5751, to amend the Subversive activities control act of 1950. Hearing"

See other formats


W}^ 


■mm- 


C/S  •Z>oc  :p.  y?/  '^'?,<  /  - 


:; 


COLLEGE 
LI BRARY 


6/  S  0. , 

HEARINGS  RELATING  TO  REVISION  OF  H.R.  9120 

AND  H.R.  5751,  TO  AMEND  THE  SUBVERSIVE 

ACTIVITIES  CONTROL  ACT  OF  1950 


HEARING 

BEFORE  THE 

COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 
HOUSE  OE  REPRESENTATIVES 

EIGHTY-SEVENTH  CONGEESS 

FIRST  SESSION 


SEPTEMBER  13,  1961 


Printed  for  the  use  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 


U.S.  GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 
75251  WASHINGTON  :   1961 


COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 
United  States  House  of  Representatives 

FRANCIS  E.  WALTER,  Pennsylvania,  Chairman 
MORGAN  M.  MOULDER,  Missouri  GORDON  H.  SCHERER,  Ohio 

CLYDE  DOYLE,  CaUfomia  AUGUST  E.  JOHANSEN,  Michigan 

EDWIN  E.  WILLIS,  Louisiana  DONALD  C.  BRUCE,  Indiana 

WILLIAM  M.  TUCK,  Virginia  HENRY  C.  SCHADEBERG,  Wisconsin 

Feank  S.  Tavknner,  Jr.,  Director 
Alfred  M.  Nittle,  Counsel 
John  C.  Walsh,  Co-counsel 
QwENN  Lewis,  Administrative  Assistant 

n 


CONTENTS 


September  13,  1961:  Testimony  of :  Page 

Nicholas  deB.  Katzenbach  (Department  of  Justice) 128 

Louis  J.  Doyle  (Post  Office  Department) 131 

D.  L.  Ritger  (Bureau  of  Customs) 132 

Appendix 135 


in 


Public  Law  601,  79th  Congress 

The  legislation  under  which  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  operates  is  Pubhc  Law  601,  79th  Congress  [1946];  60  Stat. 
812,  which  provides: 

Be  it  enacted  by  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  United  States 
oj  America  in  Congress  assembled,  *  *  * 

PART   2- RULES  OF  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

Rule  X 

SEC.    121.    STANDING    COMMITTEES 
******* 

17.  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  to  consist  of  nine  Members. 

Rule  XI 

POWERS    AND    DUTIES    OF    COMMITTEES 
3|:  H:  H:  !^  4:  ^  4= 

(q)(l)   Committee  on  Un-Amoiican  Activities. 

(A)   tin- American  activities. 

(2)  The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  whole  or  by  subcommit- 
tee, is  authorized  to  make  from  time  to  time  investigations  of  (i)  the  extent, 
character,  and  objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  the  United  States, 
(ii)  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-American  propa- 
ganda that  is  instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and  attacks 
the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Constitution,  and 
(iii)  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Con2ress  in  any  necessary 
remedial  legislation. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  shall  report  to  the  House  (or  to  the 
Clerk  of  the  House  if  the  House  is  not  in  session)  the  results  of  any  such  investi- 
gation, together  with  such  recommendations  as  it  deems  advisable. 

For  the  purpose  of  any  such  investigation,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  or  any  subcommittee  thereof,  is  authorized  to  sit  and  act  at  such 
times  and  places  within  the  United  States,  whether  or  not  the  House  is  sitting, 
has  recessed,  or  has  adjourned,  to  hold  such  hearings,  to  require  the  attendance 
of  such  witnesses  and  the  production  of  such  books,  papers,  and  documents,  and 
to  take  such  testimony,  as  it  deems  necessary.  Subpenas  may  be  issued  under 
the  signature  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee  or  any  subcommittee,  or  by  any 
member  designated  by  any  such  chairman,  and  may  be  served  by  any  person 
designated  by  any  such  chairman  or  member. 


Rule  XII 

LEGISLATIVE    OVERSIGHT    BY    STANDING    COMMITTLES 

Sec.  136.  To  assist  the  Congress  in  appraising  the  administration  of  the  laws 
and  in  developing  such  amendments  or  related  legislation  as  it  may  deem  neces- 
sary, each  standing  committee  of  the  Senate  ami  the  House  of  Representatives 
shall  exercise  continuous  watchfulness  of  the  execution  by  the  administrative 
agencies  concerned  of  any  laws,  the  subject  matter  of  which  is  within  the  jurisdic- 
tion of  such  committee;  and,  for  that  purpose,  shall  study  all  pertinent  reports 
and  data  submitted  to  the  Congress  by  the  agencies  in  the  executive  branch  of 
the  Government. 


RULES  ADOPTED  BY  THE  87TH  CONGRESS 
House  Resolution  8,  January  3,  1961 

:i!  iff  ^  *  ^  *  ^ 

Rule  X 

STANDING   COMMITTEES 

1.  There  shall  be  elected  by  the  House,  at  the  commencement  of  each  Congress, 
(r)   Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  to  consist  of  nine  Members. 

Rule  XI 

POWERS   AND    DUTIES   OF   COMMITTEES 

18.  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities. 

(a)  Un-American  activities. 

(b)  The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  whole  or  by  subcom- 
mittee, is  authorized  to  make  from  time  to  time  investigations  of  (1)  the  extent, 
character,  and  objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  the  United  States, 

(2)  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-American  propa- 
ganda that  is  instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and  attacks 
the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Constitution,  and 

(3)  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Congress  in  any  necessary 
remedial  legislation. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  shall  report  to  the  House  (or  to  the 
Clerk  of  the  House  if  the  House  is  not  in  session)  the  results  of  any  such  investi- 
gation, together  with  such  recommendations  as  it  deems  advisable. 

For  the  purpose  of  any  such  investigation,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  or  any  subcommittee  thereof,  is  authorized  to  sit  and  act  at  such 
times  and  places  within  the  United  States,  whether  or  not  the  House  is  sitting, 
has  recessed,  or  has  adjourned,  to  hold  such  hearings,  to  require  the  attendance 
of  such  witnesses  and  the  production  of  such  books,  papers,  and  documents,  and 
to  take  such  testimony,  as  it  deems  necessary.  Subpenas  may  be  issued  under 
the  signature  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee  or  any  subcommittee,  or  by  any 
member  designated  by  any  such  chairman,  and  may  be  served  by  any  person 
designated  by  any  such  chairman  or  member. 

27.  To  assist  the  House  in  appraising  the  administration  of  the  laws  and  in 
developing  such  amendments  or  related  legislation  as  it  may  deem  necessary, 
each  standing  committee  of  the  House  shall  exercise  continuous  watchfulness  of 
the  execution  by  the  administrative  agencies  concerned  of  any  laws,  the  subject 
matter  of  which  is  within  the  jurisdiction  of  such  committee;  and,  for  that  pur- 
pose, shall  study  all  pertinent  reports  and  data  submitted  to  the  House  by  the 
agencies  in  the  executive  branch  of  the  Government. 


HEARINGS  RELATING  TO  REVISION  OF  H.R.  9120  AND 
H.R.  5751  TO  AMEND  THE  SUBVERSIVE  ACTIVITIES 
CONTROL  ACT  OF  1950 


WEDNESDAY,  SEPTEMBER   13,   1961 

U.S.  House  of  Representatives, 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 

Washington,  D.C. 
executive  session 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  met  at  10  a.m.,  in  room 
216,  Old  House  Office  Building,  Washington,  D.C,  Hon.  Francis  E. 
Walter  (chairman  of  the  committee)  presiding. 

Members  present:  Representatives  Walter  of  Pennsylvania;  Doyle 
of  California;  Scherer  of  Ohio;  and  Schadeberg  of  Wisconsin. 

Also  present:  Frank  S.  Tavenner,  Jr.,  director;  Alfred  M.  Nittle, 
counsel;  John  C.  Walsh,  co-counsel;  and  Robert  F.  Guthrie,  House 
legislative  counsel's  office. 

Departmental  representatives:  Louis  J.  Doyle,  General  Counsel, 
and  Sidney  W.  Bishop,  Acting  Assistant  Postmaster  General,  Post 
Office  Department;  Nicholas  deB.  Katzenbach,  Assistant  Attorney 
General,  and  Charles  F.  Simms,  Office  of  Legal  Counsel,  and  Nathan  B. 
Lenvin,  Chief,  Registration  Section,  Internal  Security  Division,  De- 
partment of  Justice;  D.  L.  Ritger,  Assistant  Chief  Counsel,  Bureau  of 
Customs,  Treasury  Department. 

Chairman  Walter.  Gentlemen,  at  the  outset,  I  want  to  express  the 
appreciation  of  those  of  you  who  participated  in  the  drafting  of  this 
proposed  amendment.  This  is  a  very  serious  problem.  There  is  a 
growing  public  demand  that  we  do  our  duty  with  respect  to  the  influx 
of  tons  of  unwanted  brainwashing  material. 

I  think,  and  I  say  this  knowing  a  little  bit  about  the  parliamentary 
revision,  that  the  way  to  handle  this  is  to  come  up  with  what  you 
think  is  adequate.     I  know  the  problem. 

I  talked  with  Bob  Kennedy  and  I  talked  with  Mr.  White  at  length 
and  I  know  how  difficult  enforcement  was  under  the  bill  that  we  have 
on  the  calendar.  However,  we  have  a  place  on  the  calendar  and  it 
seems  to  me  that  the  way  to  handle  this  whole  thing  is  to  get  together 
on  a  proposal  and  then  have  a  conmiittee  print  prepared. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  should  like  to  clarify  certain 
points  and  also  state  certain  matters  of  background  for  the  record. 
The  committee  has  for  some  time  been  gathering  data  and  holding 
hearings  on  the  subject  of  Communist  propaganda.  These  hearings 
have  been  printed  and  made  public.  In  the  86th  Congress,  the  chair- 
man introduced  H.R.  2232,  an  omnibus  bill,  which  included  in  section 
311  thereof  the  provisions  contained  in  the  original  bill,  H.R.  5751, 
introduced  by  the  chairman  on  March  31,  1961,  in  the  87th  Congress. 

119 


120      AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    195  0 

H.R.  5751  proposed  certuin  ainendnients  to  the  Foreign  Agents 
Registration  Act  of  1938.  Among  the  amendments  proposed  to  that 
act  were  those  to  section  1(b)  and  section  3(d),  which  were  Hkewise 
presented  to  the  Congress  in  this  session  in  a  separate  bill,  H.R.  470, 
referred  to  the  Judiciary  Conmiitlee.  H.R.  470  passed  the  House  on 
May  1.  Therefore,  these  particular  amendments  no  longer  concern  us. 
However,  the  remainhig  provisions  of  H.R.  5751,  which  dealt 
with  the  major  problem  confronting  us,  and  sought  to  extend  the 
coverage  of  the  Foreign  Agents  Registration  Act  to  certam  agents  of 
foreign  powers  acting  without  the  United  States,  have  raised  serious 
practical  and  legal  problems.  Moreover,  later  evidence  coming  to 
the  attention  of  this  committee  has  pointed  up  the  necessity  of  ex- 
tending the  coverage  of  the  labeling  and  disclosure  principle  of  the 
Foreign  Agents  Registration  Act  to  situations  where  the  agency 
relationship  was  not  involved.  This  is  particularly  evident  in  the 
extension  recently  of  the  Communist  propaganda  technique  of  dis- 
seminating propaganda  directly  to  residents  of  the  United  States 
and  not  through  the  intervention  of  resident  agents.  Particularly 
since  uistrumentalities  of  foreign  propaganda  not  withhi  the  juris- 
diction of  the  United  States  present  obvious  problems  of  control,  it 
has  become  apparent  that  the  legislative  effort  would  have  to  have 
broader  coverage  and  be  less  restrictive  in  operation. 

After  study  and  consultation,  the  connnittee  prepared  H.R.  9120, 
introduced  by  the  chairman  September  11,  1961,  as  a  basis  for  solution 
of  the  difficult  problems  involved.  H.R.  9120  adopts  the  principle 
of  disclosure  utilized  in  the  Foreign  Agents  Registration  Act  and  seems 
to  be  a  practical  solution  toward  coping  with  present  major  propa- 
ganda efforts  of  the  Communist  world.  In  the  case  of  foreign  agents 
resident  within  the  United  States,  the  duty  of  disclosure  can  be,  and 
is  by  that  act,  imposed  upon  the  resident  agent.  But,  in  the  case  of 
propaganda  transmitted  by  first-class  mail  without  the  intervention 
of  a  resident  agent,  there  would  be  no  coverage  under  this  act  and 
therefore  the  disclosure  will  have  to  be  accomplished  through  other 
ineans.  H.R.  9120  accomplishes  this  through  the  disclosure  duties 
imposed  upon  the  Postmaster  General. 

The  committee  may  later  offer  additional  legislation  to  plug  the 
propaganda  loopholes  as  the  situation  develops.  Meanwhile,  today, 
we  have  called  in  the  representatives  of  the  Departments  of  Justice, 
Post  Office,  Treasury,  and  State  for  the  purpose  of  ascertaining  their 
views  on  the  approach  adopted  in  H.R.  9120.  Since  H.R.  9120  is 
certainly  germane  to  H.R.  5751,  adopting  the  same  principle  and  in 
fact  extending  its  operation,  I  understand,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  it  is 
your  suggestion  that  we  work  out  a  final  revision  of  H.R.  9120  to  be 
incorporated  as  an  amendment  to  H.R.  5751.  In  such  case,  follow- 
ing your  suggestion,  we  anticipate  striking  everything  after  the 
enacting  clause  of  H.R.  5751  and  substituting  such  revised  provisions 
of  H.R.  9120  as  may  appear  most  appropriate  and  effective.  But 
actually  the  new  bill  should  have  a  different  title  from  the  title  under 
the  old  bill. 

Chairman  Walter.  We  can  amend  the  title  as  weH. 
Mr.  Tavenxer.  I  now  ask  that  the  bills  H.R.  5751  and  H.R.  9120 
be  set  forth  in  full  in  the  record. 
(The  bills  referred  to  follow) : 


AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    1950       121 

tH.R.f5751,  87th  Cong.,  1st  sess.) 

A  BILL 

To  amend  tlie  Subversive  Activities  Control  Act  of  1950  so  as  to  require  tlie  registration  of  certain  additional 
persons  discminating  political  propaganda  within  the  United  States  as  agents  of  a  foregin  principal,  and 
for  other  purposes 

Be  it  enacted  by  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  United  States  of 
America  in  Congress  assembled,  That  section  20  of  the  Subversive  Activities  Control 
Act  of  1950  is  amended  by  inserting  "(a)"  immediately  after  "Sec.  20."  and  by 
adding  at  the  end  thereof  the  following  new  subsections: 

"(b)  Section  1(b)  of  the  Foreign  Agents  Registration  Act  of  1938,  as  amended 
(22  U.S.C.  611(b)),  is  amended  by  adding  at  the  end  thereof  the  following  now 
clause : 

"  '(6)  an  individual  domestic  partnership,  association,  corporation,  orga- 
nization, or  other  combination  of  individuals,  supervised,  directed,  or 
controlled  by  a  government  of  a  foreign  country  or  a  foreign  political  i)artv' 

"(c)  Section  3(d)  of  such  Act  (22  U.S.C.  613(d))  is  amended  to  read"  as 
follows : 

"  '(d)  Any  person  engaging  or  agreeing  to  engage  only  in  private  and  non- 
political  financial  or  mercantile  activities  in  furtherance  of  the  bona  fide  trade  or 
coinnierce  of  such  foreign  principal  or  in  the  soliciting  and  collecting  of  funds 
and  contributions  within  the  United  States  to  be  used  only  for  medical  aid  and 
assistance,  or  for  food  and  clothing  to  relieve  human  suffering,  if  such  solicitation 
or  collection  of  funds  and  contributions  is  in  accordance  with  and  subject  to  the 
Neutrality  Act  of  1939  (22  U.S.C.  441  and  the  following),  and  such  rules  and  regu- 
lations as  may  be  prescribed  thereunder;'. 

"(d)  Section  4(a)  of  such  Act  (22  U.S.C.  614(a))  is  amended  to  read  as  follows: 

"  '(a)  Every  person  within  the  United  States  who  is  an  agent  of  a  foreign 
principal  and  required  to  register  under  the  provisions  of  this  Act  who  im{)orts  or 
causes  to  be  imported,  or  who  transmits  or  causes  to  be  transmitted  in  the  United 
States  mails  or  by  any  means  or  instrumentality  of  interstate  or  foreign  commerce, 
any  political  propaganda  shall,  not  later  than  forty-eight  hours  after  the  beginning 
of  the  importation  or  transmittal  thereof,  send  to  the  Librarian  of  Congress  two 
copies  thereof  and  file  with  the  Attorney  General  one  copy  thereof  and  a  statement, 
duly  signed  by  or  on  behalf  of  such  agent,  setting  forth  full  information  as  to  the' 
places,  times,  and  extent  of  such  importation  or  tranmittal. 

"(e)   Section  4(b)  of  such  Act  (22  U.S.C.  614(b))  is  amended  to  read  as  follows: 

"  '(b)  It  shall  be  unlawful  for  any  person  within  the  United  States  who  is  an 
agent  of  a  foreign  principal  and  required  to  register  under  the  provisions  of  this 
Act  to  import  or  cause  to  be  imported,  or  to  transmit  or  cause  to  be  transmitted 
in  the  United  States  mails  or  by  any  means  or  instrumentality  of  interstate  or 
foreign  commerce,  any  political  propaganda  unless  such  political  propaganda  is 
conspicuously  marked  at  its  beginning  with,  or  prefaced  or  accompanied  by,  a 
true  and  accurate  statement,  in  the  language  or  languages  used  in  such  political 
propaganda,  setting  for  that  the  person  importing  or  transmitting  such  political 
propaganda  or  causing  it  to  ])e  imported  or  transmitted  is  registered  under  this 
Act  with  the  Department  of  Justice,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  as  an 
agent  of  a  foreign  principal,  together  with  the  name  and  address  of  such  agent  of 
a  foreign  principal  and  of  each  of  his  foreign  principals;  that,  as  required  by  this 
Act,  his  registration  statement  is  available  for  inspection  at  and  copies  of  such 
political  propaganda  are  being  filed  with  the  Department  of  Justice;  and  that 
registration  of  agents  of  foreign  principals  required  by  the  Act  does  not  indicate 
approval  by  the  United  States  Government  of  the  contents  of  their  political  pro- 
paganda. The  Attorney  General,  having  due  regard  for  the  national  security 
and  the  public  interest,  may  be  regulation  prescribe  the  language  or  languages 
and  the  manner  and  form  in  which  such  statement  shall  be  made  and  require 
the  inclusion  of  such  other  information  contained  in  the  registration  statement 
identifying  such  agent  of  a  foreign  principal  anrl  such  pt)litical  propaganda  and  its 
sources  as  may  be  appropriate.' 

"(f)  Section  4  of  such  Act  (22  U.S.C.  614)  is  amended  by  adding  at  the  end 
thereof  the  following  new  subsection: 

"  '(e)  Any  person  not  within  the  United  States  who  used  the  United  States 
mails  or  any  means  or  instrumentality  of  interstate  or  foreign  commerce  witliin 
the  United  States  to  circulate  or  disseminate  any  political  propaganda  shall  be 
regarded,  for  the  purposes  of  this  Act,  as  an  agent  of  a  foreign  principal  who  is 
acting  within  the  United  States.  This  subsection  shall  have  no  application  to 
any  such  person  outside  the  United  States  when  his  use  of  the  United  States  mails 

75251—61 2 


122       AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    195  0 

or  a  means  or  instrumentality  of  interstate  or  foreign  commerce  within  the  United 
States  is  confined  to  the  transmittal  of  political  propaganda  to  a  person  registered 
under  tlie  terms  of  this  Act.'  " 

Sec.  2.  The  Subversive  Activities  Control  Act  of  1950  is  further  amended  by 
inserting,  immediately  after  section  20  thereof,  the  following  new  section: 

"comptroller  of  foreign  propaganda 

"Sec.  20A.  There  is  hereby  established,  in  the  Bureau  of  Customs  of  the 
Department  of  the  Treasury,  the  Office  of  the  Comptroller  of  Foreign  Propaganda 
to  be  located  at  tlie  seat  of  the  Government  in  Washington,  District  of  Columbia! 
Such  Office  shall  be  headed  b.v  a  Director,  who  shall  be  appointed  by  the  Secretary 
of  the  Treasury  and  who  shall  have  rank  and  compensation  equal  to  that  of  the 
Deputy  Commissioner  of  the  Bureau  of  Customs.  The  Director  shall  be  a  citizen 
of  the  United  States,  qualified  by  at  least  five  years'  experience  in  the  import 
control  of  political  propaganda,  and  shall  maintain  close  liaison  with  the  appro- 
priate committee  of  Congress  in  order  that  they  may  be  advised  regarding  the 
control  of  Communist  and  other  foreign  propaganda  brought  to,  and  sought  to  be 
disseminated  in,  the  United  States.  He  shall  perform  those  functions  with  respect 
to  the  control  of  Communist  and  other  foreign  propaganda  which  are  vested  in 
the  Secretary  of  the  Treasury,  to  the  extent  that  the  performance  of  such  functions 
may  be  delegated  to  him  by  the  Secretary,  and  he  shall  perform  such  other  func- 
tions as  the  Secretary  may  prescribe." 


[H.R.  9120,  87tli  Cong.,  Istsess.] 

A  BILL  To  amend  the  Subversive  Activities  Control  Act  of  1950  so  as  to  require  the  Postmaster  General 
in  certain  cases  to  give  notice  of  the  use  of  the  mails  for  the  dissemination  of  Communist  propaganda 

Be  it  enacted  by  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  United  Slates  of 
America  in  Congress  assembled,  That  the  Subversive  Activities  Control  Act  of 
1950  is  amended  by  inserting  immediately  at  the  end  of  section  10  thereof,  the 
following  new  section: 

"notice  of  subversive  mail 

"Sec.  10 a.  (a)  As  the  result  of  evidence  adduced  before  various  committees 
of  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives,  the  Congress  finds,  and  the  Com- 
munist parties  of  the  world  united  in  the  world  Communist  movement  avow, 
that  the  world  Communist  movement  adheres  to  the  doctrines  and  practices  of 
Marxism-Leninism.  Marxism-Leninism  adopts  the  principle  that  the  end— 
which  is  the  establishment  of  Conununist  totalitarian  dictatorship  in  countries 
throughout  the  world — justifies  any  means  for  the  accomplishment  of  that  end, 
and  expressly  repudiates  the  spiritual  and  moral  compulsion  for  truth  and  decency 
to  whicli  the  United  States  and  other  free  societies  adhere.  Marxism-Leninism 
expressly  in  doctrine  and  practice  suboixlinates  morality  to  the  interest  of  its 
revolutionary  movement,  and  deliberately  employs  the  instrumentality  of  propa- 
ganda in  such  interest  without  regard  for  the  truth  or  falsity  of  the  propaganda. 
The  objective  of  Communist  proi)aganda  is  to  create  within  non-Communist 
societies  such  a  degree  of  social  fission  and  confusion  as  will  advance  the  policies 
and  goal  of  the  world  Communist  movement.  It  is  further  found  that  the  postal 
services  of  free  societies  are  used  as  an  instrumentality  for  the  dissemination  of 
such  propaganda,  and  vast  ((uantities  thereof  are  conveyed,  unsolicited,  to  re- 
cipients in  the  United  States,  frequently  disguised  as  to  origin  and  character, 
raising  questions  in  the  minds  of  the  recipients  as  to  its  purpose  and  origin,  and 
in  some  instances  alarming  persons  resident  in  the  United  States  who  are  concerned 
because  of  its  receipt. 

"(b)  In  the  case  of  all  mail  originating  from  without  the  United  States  and 
transmitted  through  the  United  States  postal  service,  and  which  contains,  or 
which  the  Postmaster  General  has  reason  to  believe  may  contain.  Communist 
proj)aganda,  the  Postmaster  General  shall  give  written  notice  by  mail,  in  the  form 
of  a  letter  hereinafter  set  forth,  to  the  addressee  of  such  mail. 

"(c)  Such  notice  shall  be  prepared  by  the  Postmaster  General,  and  shall  be 
transmitted  to  the  addressee  under  such  circumstances  and  in  accordance  with 
such  rules  and  regulations  as  the  Postmaster  General  shall  prescribe  for  the 
effective  administration  and  execution  of  the  duties  imposed  by  this  section. 


AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    1950       123 

"(d)  The  notice  shall  include  a  copy  of  subsection  (a)  of  this  section,  and  shall 
also  include  but  shall  not  be  limited  to  the  following  language: 

"  'The  United  States  postal  service  is  being  utilized,  in  certain  instances, 
by  the  world  Communist  conspiracy  to  transmit,  unsolicited  in  most  cases, 
propaganda  which  originated  abroad,  as  well  as  within  the  United  States. 
You  may,  or  may  not  have  been,  in  receipt  of  such  propaganda.  Much  of 
this  propaganda  is  transmitted  through  first-class  mail.  Having  a  regard 
for  the  preservation  of  the  ])rivacy  of  your  mail,  first-class  mail  is  not  opened 
for  inspection  by  the  postal  service.  This  propaganda  is  frequently  not 
marked  as  to  origin  or  character.  It  has  raised  questions  in  the  minds  of 
the  recipients  thereof  as  to  its  purpose  and  significance. 

"  'Propaganda  is  regarded  by  the  Communists  as  an  imjiortant  and 
necessary  means  for  achieving  world  subversion,  and  recently  this  propaganda 
effort  has  been  intensified  with  the  result  that  millions  of  pieces  of  mail  are 
being  disseminated  within  the  United  States  by  the  world  Communist 
movement. 

"  'To  clarify  any  question  as  to  the  character  and  origin  of  such  mail,  this 
letter  is  forwarded  for  your  information.'  " 

Chairman  Walter.  As  I  stated  yesterday,  we  are  to  prepare  a  bill 
designed  to  deal  with  certain  aspects  of  the  rather  complex  problems 
arising  by  reason  of  the  influx  of  millions  of  pieces  of  Conmiimist 
propaganda  which  have  their  origin  abroad  and  are  now— disguised 
as  to  character  and  origin — disseminated  in  great  part  by  first-class 
mail  within  the  United  States. 

This  bill  is  proposed  to  amend  the  wSubversive  Activities  Control 
Act  of  1950  so  as  to  require  the  Postmaster  General  in  certain  cases  to 
give  notice.  ; 

Within  recent  months  we  have  observed  an  accelei'ation  of  the  Com- 
munist brainwashing  effort  directed  at  the  free  world  and  particularly 
to  residents  of  the  United  States. 

This  increased  tempo  of  Communist  propaganda  activity,  I  believe, 
bears  a  close  relation  to  the  rising  temperature  of  the  international 
situation,  which,  in  turn,  is  a  consequence  of  the  growing  power  and 
arrogance  of  the  Communist  bloc. 

Communist  propaganda  items  from  abroad  transmitted  through  the 
U.S.  postal  service  have  increased  in  the  year  1960  to  an  astounding 
137  percent  over  the  year  1959,  whereas,  the  increase  in  the  year  1959 
over  the  year  1958  was  only  18  percent. 

During  the  year  1959,  the  U.S.  customs  service  processed  over  6 
million  packages  of  Communist  propaganda,  containing  over  10 
million  items  of  printed  matter. 

In  1960,  over  14  million  packages  were  processed,  containing  in 
excess  of  21  million  items,  such  as  newspapers,  magazines,  books, 
pictures,  and  posters.  During  the  2  months  of  Febi'uary  and  Marcli 
1961,  over  102,000  packages  of  magazines  and  11,000  packages  of 
newspapers  were  addressed  to  the  United  States  from  Connnunist 
Cuba,  which  is  now  the  base  of  Conmiunist  operations  hi  this  hemi- 
sphere. 

The  extraordinary  Communist  effort  in  the  field  of  propaganda  is 
further  attested  by  a  report  of  the  U.S.  Office  of  Education  indicating 
that  in  1959  the  Soviet  Union  published  over  30  million  books,  con- 
taining 830  titles,  in  26  foreign  languages,  for  dissemhiation  to  non- 
Communist  countries  and  which  were  either  distributed  free  or  sold 
far  below  cost  mainly  to  Asia,  Africa,  and  Latin  America. 

In  the  above  figures  of  packages  of  Communist  propaganda  entering 
the  United  States,  I  did  not  include  in  that  number  the  millions  of 
pieces  of  first-class  mail,   contaming  Communist  propaganda,   also 


124       AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    1950 

rocoivcd  I'roin  abroad.  Such  iii;ul  is  not  opciicd  for  inspection,  and 
presents  certain  obvious  problems. 

It  is  significant  that  tlic  Conununist  conspiracy  is  now  extensively 
utili/.ing  fii-st-class  mailing  privileges  as  a  means  for  disseminating 
their  poison  and  fiction.  I  have  received  reports  and  complaints 
from  all  areas  of  the  United  States. 

Many  people  have  become  annoyed,  and  some  confused,  and  others 
alarmed.  A  good  bit  of  this  mail  is  addressed  to  foreign-language 
groups,  wJio  sense  the  possibility  of  blackmail  or  harm.  The  extent 
of  the  effort  clearly  attests  the  importance  with  which  the  Commu- 
nists regard  this  propaganda  campaign. 

George  V.  Allen,  formerly  Director  of  tlie  U.S.  Information  Agency, 
previously  estimated  that  the  amount  expended  by  the  Communists 
in  the  year  1957  for  propa^janda  in  the  non-Communist  world  was 
between  $500  and  $750  million. 

Present  estimates  of  the  amount  being  expended  in  this  field  indi- 
cates that  the  amount  may  well  exceed  $2  billion. 

How  docs  one  cope  with  this  propaganda?  Does  one  collect  and 
destroy  such  items  of  propaganda  piece  })y  piece?  Is  this  presently 
practicable,  or  even  desirable?  Curiously,  Lenin  long  ago  pointed  up 
tlie  absurdity  of  such  an  effort. 

In  his  notorious  theoretical  document  "What's  To  Be  Done," 
Lenin  laid  down  the  basic  doctrine  for  the  conduct  of  Communist 
propaganda,  and  agitational  activities. 

While  stressing  the  importance  of  the  distribution  of  "illegal  liter- 
ature" by  his  band  of  secret  Communist  revolutionaries,  he  amused 
himself  by  pointing  out  the  difl^culties  which  the  opponents  of  commu- 
nism would  find  in  coping  with  it. 

He|said : 

Thn  police  will  soon  come  to  realize;  tiv"  folly  and  futility  of  setting  the  whole 
jiulicial  and  administrative  machine  into  motion  to  intercept  every  copy  of  a 
publication  that  is  being  broadcast  in  thousands. 

Now  I  would  point  out  that  the  success  of  such  "illegal  literature" 
depends  upon  the  people  to  whom  it  is  addressed.  Lenin  must  have 
assumed  the  existence  of  an  unsophisticated  audience.  That  will  not 
be  the  case  in  the  United  States. 

The  antidote  for  the  poison  of  Conununist  propaganda  is  knowl- 
edge and  truth.  We  shall  counterattack  in  that  way.  As  Justice 
Holmes  once  remarked,  "The  remedy  for  speech  is  more  speech,"  and 
I  believe  that  applies  in  this  situation.  I  have  no  real  fear  that  this 
absurd  Communist  propaganda  will  seduce  anv  appreciable  segment 
of  our  people,  or  lead  them  from  tbe  path  of  reason  and  loyalty — if 
our  people  are  adequately  informed  as  to  its  nature,  orfgin,  and 
character. 

In  the  Internal  Security  Act  of  1950  (title  I,  cited  as  tlie  "Sub- 
versive Activities  Control  Act")  we  there  had  to  deal  with  the 
prol)lems  involved  in  the  dissemination  of  Communist  propaganda 
within  the  LTnited  States  by  Communist  action  and  front  groups. 

Under  section  10,  these  problems  were  met  in  part  simply  by  re- 
quiring Communist  organizations,  against  whom  a  final  order  to 
register  is  in  effect,  to  label  all  publications  transmitted  in  the  mail 
as  being  disseminated  by  a  Communist  organization,  and  to  announce 
the  sponsorship  of  any  radio  or  television  broadcast  conducted  by 
them. 


AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    1950       125 

We  there  felt  that  if  our  people  were  informed  of  the  nature,  origin, 
and  contents  of  sucJi  propaganda  activity,  they  would  be  able  to  judge 
and  deal  witji  it.  Tjie  bill  H.R.  9120  we  consider  today,  in  fact  and 
in  effect  also  supplements  section  10  of  the  Internal  Security  Act. 

While  section  10  requires  the  labeling  of  Communist  propaganda 
disseminated  by  internal  Communist  organizations,  we  extend  the 
disclosure  process  to  publications  transmitted  by  mail  from  without 
the  United  States  to  persons  resident  here. 

Moreover,  I  believe  that  it  is  important  to  strengthen  the  democratic 
process,  which  I  believe  is  tlie  natural  effect  and  result  of  this  type  of 
disclosure  and  information  statute. 

If  our  people  ai'e  informed  of  the  natm'e  and  techniques  of  Com- 
munist propaganda — and  this  is  a  responsibility  of  the  educational 
process  and  the  free  press — we  shall  not  need  fear  that  our  people  will 
become  infected.  Knowledge  is  the  most  eft'ective  immunization 
against  the  propaganda  virus. 

I  believe  that  when  all  our  people  understand  the  degraded  and 
corrupt  tactics  of  Marxism-Leninism,  the  Communists  will  find  their 
propaganda  effort  to  be  waste  of  money  and  paper.  They  will  not 
undermine  our  society:  they  shall  only  destroy  themselves. 

Mr.  ScHEKER.  Did  the  Justice  Department  draft  this  language  in 
H.R.  9120? 

Mr.  Tavenner.  No.  This  was  drafted  by  the  cominittee  staff. 
This  follows  the  procedure  of  the  Internal  Security  xict  of  1950  which 
does  make  certain  findings  and  we  thought  that  the  connnittee  thought 
that  the  Congress  should  at  this  time  reassert  and  reaffirm  those  very 
findings. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Is  this  language  from  tlie  Internal  Security  Act  or 
something  similar  to  it? 

Mr.  Tavenner.  No.  What  we  did  is  reaffirm  and  reassert  it  by 
reference.  We  do  not  do  it  by  copying  tlie  whole  thing  in  here  again. 
We  did,  however,  extend  the  statement  pertaining  to  Marxism- 
Leninism. 

Chairman  Walter.  Let's  look  at  section  10(A),  subsection  (a). 
Perhaps  this  might  better  be  included  in  the  report  on  the  amended 
bin. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Do  you  think  it  should  be  put  in  a  report? 

Chairman  Walter.  Yes;  it  belongs  in  a  report. 

Mr.  Scherer.  What  does  this  bill  do  primarily? 

Mr.  Tavenner.  This  bill  requires  the  Postmaster  General  to  send 
a  notice  to  everyone — to  the  recipients  of  all  of  this  Communist  Party 
propaganda  of  a  character  that  we  set  forth  here  in  section  D. 

Mr.  Scherer.  Does  somebody  have  to  evaluate  this  propaganda 
upon  receipt? 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Let  me  explain  the  procedure  that  was  followed. 
The  procedure  that  was  followed  was  that  the  Post  Office  Department 
selected  all  of  this  material  tlvey  had  reason  to  believe  was  coming 
in  from  Soviet  bloc  countries  and  which  contained  this  propaganda. 
They  have  turned  it  over  to  Customs.  Customsjmade  a  probably 
more  minute  investigation  of  it  but  they  did  not  open,  of  course, 
any  first-class  mail. 

Then,  then  would  advise  the  Postmaster  General  and  the  Post- 
master Gener.  !  would  write  letters  to  the  addressees  as  to  whether  or 
not  they  wanted  this  material. 


125       AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    1950 

wSo  the  ])rocedure  that,  was  followed  was  far  fi-oiii  beinji;  an  effective 
procedure.  However,  this  has  the  advantage  of  saying  we  are  not 
trying  to  keep  the  American  pubhc  from  receiving  this  information 
but  we  are  advising  them  of  the  nature  of  it,  the  general  nature  of  it, 
the  source  of  it. 

Mr.  ScHEKER.  Do  you  feel  this  is  more  effective  than  putting  teeth 
into  the  Foreign  Agents'  Registration  Act  as  proposed  in  11. R.  5751?''] 

Mr.  Tavenner.  I  do  not  thiidv  there  is  any  doubt  al)Out  it. 

ChairniiU)  Walter.  On   page  2,  you  have  spelled   out  what  the 
notice  should  contain.     I  believe  the  details  of  the  notice  should  be 
left  to  the  Postmaster  General,  as  the  particular  situation  may  warrantf 
from  time  to  time. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  I  would  like  for  the  representatives  present  in 
behalf  of  the  Department  of  Justice,  the  Post  Office  Department,  and 
the  Customs  Bureau  of  the  Treasury  Department  to  state  their  names 
for  the  record.     We  will  first  begin  with  Justice. 

Mr.  Katzenbach.  Nicholas  de  B.  Katzenbach.     I  am  accompanied  ' 
by  Mr.  Charles  F.  Sknms,  attorney  in  the  Office  of  Legal  Counsel  and 
Mr.  Nathan  Lenvin,  Chief  of  the  Registration  Section  of  the  Internal 
Security  Division. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Post  Office  Department. 

l\Ir.  Doyle.  Louis  J.  Doyle,  General  Counsel,  accompanied  by 
Sidney  W.  Bishop,  Acting  Assistant  Postmaster  General,  Bureau  of 
Facilities. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Customs. 

Mr.  RiTGER.  Donald  Ritger,  Assistant  Chief  Counsel,  Bureau  of 
Customs,  Treasury  Department. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  This  same  group  has  met  and  discussed  prior  to 
this  the  problems  relating  to  H.R.  5751. 

In  connection  with  these  matters,  the  Departjuent  of  Justice, 
through  the  letter  of  Byron  R.  White,  Deputy  Attorney  General, 
bearing  tlie  date  of  June  12,  1961,  set  forth  the  objections  to  H.R. 
5751,  and  the  matters  and  questions  raised  by  this  letter  were  discussed 
recently  in  a  staff  conference  held  by  those  present.  H.R.  9120  has 
been  prepared  by  the  staff  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activi- 
ties and  is  being  presented  at  this  time  for  hearing  and  discussion.  I 
would  like  first  to  call  ui:)on  the  Department  of  Justice  to  express  such 
views  as  it  is  advised  should  be  expressed  regarding  its  provisions  and 
whether  or  not  it  is  considered  by  the  Department  of  Justice  that  such 
a  bill  should  be  substituted  for  H.R.  5751. 

Mr.  Katzenbach.  Mr.  Tavenner,  I  have  prepared  a  very  short 
statement  here  which  supports  the  general  objectives  of  H.R.  9120 
prior  to  our  discussion  this  morning.  I  think  it  might  be  helpful  if  I 
simply  submitted  that  for  the  record.  It  expresses  the  support  of  the 
Department  of  Justice  for  a  program  of  this  kind  and  points  out  very 
briefly  that  other  approaches  have  serious  legal  and  constitutional 
difficidties. 

.^The  comments  in  this  statement  would  be  applicable  as  well  to  the 
points  that  I  would  raise  with  regard  to  this  revision  this  morning. 
That  is  to  say,  the  statement  makes  the  point  that  we  regard  it  as 
unwise  in  the  statute  to  attempt  to  tie  the  notice  which  is  proposed 
therein  to  any  finding  on  the  part  of  the  Postmaster  General  that  the 
material  mailed  from  abroad  may  contain  Communist  propaganda. 
This  appears  to  put  the  Postmaster  General  in  the  i)osition  of  evaluat- 
ing material  rather  than  deliverin"-  it — dcliverino-  the  mail. 


AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    195  0       127 

Tlierel'orc,  we  believe  that  it  would  be  preferable  to  give  the  Post 
master  General  a  somewhat  broader  authority  to  publieize  by  postei' 
and  by  notice  the  I'act  that  mail  received  from  abroad  may  be  of  this 
kind  without  in  any  way  characterizing  or  attempting  to  characterize 
the  particidar  mad  as  being  Commimist  propaganda  and  without 
being  required  by  the  statute  to  make  any  such  judgment  whatsoever. 

Otherwise,  we  fear  that  it  may  raise  thoughts  at  least  that  the 
Postmaster  General  is  engaged  in  the  business  of  censoring,  character- 
izing mail  and  some  people  may  even  believe  that  he  is  opening  nuiil 
and  reading  their  mail,  and  this,  of  course,  woidd  l)e  offensive  to  most 
people. 

Apart  from  that,  the  only  additional  comment  that  I  would  make 
would  be  that  we  believe  that  the  particular  form  of  tlie  notice  should 
be  left  to  the  discretion  of  the  Postmaster  General.  It  is  perfectly 
appropriate  for  the  Congress  to  suggest  in  general  the  contents  if  it 
so  desires  but  it  seems  to  me  in  a  program  that  is  being  legislated  the 
Postmaster  General  should  have  the  discretion  from  time  to  time  to 
change  the  language  in  order  to  meet  new  contnigencies  and  new  de- 
velop:nents  and  this  would  give  a  more  flexible  program  of  hiforma- 
tion. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Let  me  interrupt  you  at  this  point.  If  you  will 
examhie  the  revised  bill,  you  will  see  it  does  provide  specifically  that 
which  is  required  as  stated  in  that  section. 

Mr.  Katzenbach.  That  is  right,  but  it  does  insofar  as  it  makes  it 
mandatory  to  mclude  certain  provisions  of  law  which  if  that  is  the 
desire  of  the  Congress  to  have  included  in  the  notice,  I  would  not 
object  to  but  would  simply  make  the  comment  that  perhaps  the 
longer  the  notice,  possibly  the  less  effective  it  may  be.  I  think  the 
committee  should  give  that  point  consideration  and  make  its  own 
jud'^_;ment  in  that  regard. 

I  do  have  one  comment  with  regard  to  the  notice  as  set  forth  in 
paragraph  d  of  the  revised  form  and  that  is  with  regard  to  the  last 
eight  words  in  the  second  paragraph,  "except  as  may  be  otherwise 
authorized  by  law."  While  I  would  support  this  language  in  the 
statute  itself,  I  have  some  concern  that  its  inclusion  in  the  notice  may 
lead  people  to  believe  that  there  is  in  fact  a  Government  program  of 
censorship  whereby  mail  is  opened,  inspected,  and  censored  and  I 
would  propose  the  elunination  of  that  particular  language  even  from 
the  notice,  as  suggested  by  the  statute,  but  not  from  paragraph  f,  let 
me  emphasize,  of  the  legislation  itself. 

I  believe  those  are  all  the  comments  I  can  make  in  addition  to  this 
short  statement  that  I  have  prepared  and  which  is  directed,  as  I  said, 
to  the  original  H.R.  9120,  as  introduced,  which  I  submit  for  the 
record,  should  you  wish  it. 

I  have  talked  informally  with  the  representatives  of  the  Department 
of  State  who  are  unable  to  be  here  this  morning.  They  feel  that 
H.R.  9120  in  general  is  an  internal  matter  without  great  foreign  policy 
significance.  They  do  point  out  as  this  committee  would  be  well 
aware  that  anything  done  in  this  area  will  of  course  be  publicized  in 
the  worst  possible  light  by  the  Communist  press.  That  is  to  say  to 
the  extent  possible,  it  will  be  characterized  as  a  program  of  censor- 
ship, opening  of  mail,  surveillance,  and  so  forth.  They  felt  for  this 
reason  wliile  these  comments  will  be  made  in  any  event  in  all  likhhood, 
it  is  desirable  in  the  legislation  to  include  the  provisions  which  now 


128      AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    1950 

appear  in  the  provision  explicitly  stating  that  this  is  not  the  purpose 
and  objective  of  the  Act, 

Mr.  Tavenner.  I  would  like  to  confirm  that  statement.  I  re- 
ceived a  call  just  a  little  while  ago  from  the  State  Department  ex- 
pressing the  same  views  and  asking  that  I  transmit  them  to  the  chair- 
man of  the  committee  and  express  their  regret  at  not  being  able  to  be 
represented  here  this  morning. 

It  is  noted  on  page  4  of  your  report  that  you  make  reference  to 
adding  a  provision  specifically  disclaiming  that  the  new  legislation 
confers  any  new  authority  upon  the  Postmaster  General  to  open, 
inspect,  or  censor  the  mail.  Tliis  provision  does  appear,  does  it  not, 
in  the  revision  of  H.ll.  9120? 

Mr.  Katzenbach.  That  is  right,  Mr.  Tavenner. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Mr.  Chairman,  I^suggest  that  the  report  from  the 
Department  of  Justice  be  made  a  part  of  the  record. 

Chairman  Walter.  The  report  of  the  Department  of  Justice  will 
be  read  into  the  record. 

REPORT  OF  THE  DEPARTMENT  OF  JUSTICE 

Mr.  Katzenbach.  I  appreciate  this  opportunity  to  appear  before 
this  committee  in  connection  with  its  consideration  of  H.R.  9120. 

During  recent  years,  large  quantities  of  unsolicited  Communist 
propaganda  have  been  mailed  into  this  country.  I  know  of  no  author- 
itative estimates  of  the  precise  magnitude  or  recent  trend  of  those 
importations.  There  is  some  indication  that  in  recent  months  the 
amount  of  printed  matter  so  imported  is  less,  but  tliis  may  have  been 
compensated  for  by  an  increase  in  other  means  such  as  first  class  mail. 
In  any  event,  accurate  figures  would  t)e  difficult  to  arrive  at. 

Communist  propaganda,  is  not,  of  course,  accurately  labeled  as 
such  or  described  as  to  its  origin  or  character.  If  it  originates  from 
behind  the  Iron  Curtain,  then  one  can  indulge  in  presumptions  in  this 
respect.  But  often  tliis  is  not  the  case,  and  insofar  as  its  origin  is 
evident  to  the  recipient,  there  may  be  nothing  to  indicate  its  true 
nature  save  an  examination  of  its  contents.  And  as  tliis  committee 
knows,  it  would  be  extremely  difficult  to  formulate  a  program,  com- 
patible with  our  Constitution  and  our  traditional  concepts  of  a  free 
exchange  of  ideas  and  information,  wJiicli  attempts  to  label  written 
material  as  Comiiiumst  propaganda. 

The  great  l)ulk  of  Communist  propaganda  is  unsolicited,  and  there 
is  no  connection  between  its  receipt  in  this  country  and  any  sympathj^ 
whatsoever  by  the  recipient  to  (Jommunist  goals  or  objectives.  I  am 
sure  that  the  committee  would  agree  that  it  is  important  in  any 
legislative  program  by  the  Congress  in  this  resj^ect  to  avoid  any 
inference  that  recipients  are  in  any  way  associated  with,  or  sympa- 
thetic to,  the  international  Communist  movement.  After  all,  such 
propaganda,  to  be  most  efl^ective,  must  be  aimed  at  those  who  do 
not  already  have  views  or  opinions  of  a  Communist  nature.  Its 
objective  often  is  to  confuse  specific  issues,  obfuscate  facts,  and  cause 
doubts  among  people  completely  loyal  to  the  United  States. 

I  am  confident  that  this  barrage  of  Communist  propaganda  con- 
stitutes no  real  threat  to  our  form  of  government  and  that  it  in  no 
way  compels  us  to  abandon  our  traditional  concepts  of  free  speech 
and  free  press.     I  am  sure  that  the  members  of  this  committee  agree 


AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    1950      129 

that  the  American  people  will  not  be  influenced  by  Communist 
propaganda  no  matter  how  insidious  that  propaganda  ma}^  be.  At 
the  same  time  it  is  often  possible  to  promote  Communist  causes  with 
arguments  which,  to  the  nonexpert,  are  difficult  to  tie  to  the  Com- 
munist movement.  For  this  reason,  it  seems  to  me  that  we  should 
publicize  the  existence  of  such  propaganda — without  characterizing 
specific  instances — so  that  persons  receiving  unsolicited  mail  from 
abroad  will  be  aware  that  it  may  have  originated  as  a  part  of  the 
Communist  effort.  To  do  so  seems  to  me  completely  consistent  with 
our  basic  constitutional  principles  and  has  the  merit  of  indicating 
that  the  Government,  whde  aware  of  the  efforts  of  the  Communist 
Party  and  its  sympathizers,  has  confidence  in  the  judgment  of  the 
American  people. 

H.R.  9120  is  designed  to  accomplish  this  purpose.  It  would  require 
the  Postmaster  General  to  provide  recipients  of  foreign  mail,  which 
contains  or  appears  to  contain  Communist  propaganda,  with  a  state- 
ment concerning  Communist  activities  and  objectives,  and  a  notice 
of  the  probable  character  or  origin  of  the  mail  involved. 

I  agree  with  the  purpose  and  approach  of  H.R.  9120 — which  seeks 
to  inform  the  American  public  while  avoiding  all  semblances  of 
censorship,  prior  restraints,  or  withholding  of  mail.  I  believe, 
however,  that  this  proposed  legislation  could  be  made  less  burdensome 
and  more  flexible  without  impairing  its  basic  purpose.  Specifically, 
I  feel  that  it  would  be  advisable  to  revise  subsection  (b)  so  as  to 
v^est  the  Postmaster  General  with  greater  discretion  in  determining 
when  and  to  whom  notices  will  be  sent.  Similarly,  it  would  keep  the 
Post  Office  Department  out  of  the  difficult  business  of  characterizing 
political  information. 

I  would  add  a  provision  to  that  subsection  specifically  disclaiming 
that  the  new  legislation  confers  any  new  authority  upon  the  Post- 
master General  to  open,  inspect,  or  censor  the  mail,  except  as  author- 
ized by  existing  law.  This  would  avoid  any  misunderstanding  in 
this  respect. 

Finally,  I  would  delete  subsection  (c),  which  prescribes,  in  part, 
the  type  of  notice  which  shall  be  used  and,  as  noted  above,  I  would 
vest  the  Postmaster  General  with  discretionary  authority  in  this 
regard.  This  would  permit  the  Postmaster  General  to  alter  the  form 
of  the  notice  from  time  to  time  to  fit  varying  conditions  and  in  the 
light  of  experience.  In  addition,  I  feel  that  the  proposed  notice 
slioidd  be  concise,  perhaps  in  the  form  of  a  post  card,  in  order  to 
enhance  the  likelihood  that  the  notice  will  be  read  by  the  individual 
concerned  and  in  order  to  confine  the  administrative  burden  and  cost 
of  this  program  to  a  minimum. 

If  H.R.  9120  is  amended  as  I  have  suggested,  the  Department  of 
Justice  would  favor  its  enactment. 

Mr.  NiTTLE.  Mr.  Chairman,  may  I  point  out  that,  in  response  to 
the  request  of  the  committee  staff",  Mr.  Katzenbach  has  submitted 
today  a  proposal  for  the  revision  of  H.R.  9120,  as  an  amendment  to 
H.R.  5751.  I  ask  that  it  be  made  a  part  of  the  record  at  this  point 
for  purposes  of  discussion. 

Chairman  Walter.  Let  it  be  made  a  part  of  the  record. 

(The  material  referred  to  follows :) 


130      AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    19  50 

Proposed  Amendment  to  H.R.  5751,  as  Reported 

Strike  out  all  after  the  enacting  clause  and  insert  in  lieu  thereof  the  following: 

"In  order  to  alert  the  general  public  to  the  fact  that  large  quantities  of  Com- 
munist propaganda  are  being  mailed  into  this  country  from  abroad,  the  Post- 
master General  is  authorized  (1)  to  publicize  such  fact  by  appropriate  notices 
to  be  posted  in  post  offices  or  sent  to  recipients  of  foreign  mail,  and  (2)  to  permit 
the  return  without  cost  to  the  recipient  of  unsolicited  foreign  mail  to  local  post 
offices.  Nothing  in  this  section  shall  be  deemed  to  authorize  the  Postmaster 
General  to  open,  inspect,  or  censor  any  mail  except  as  otherwise  authorized  by 
law.  The  Postmaster  General  is  authorized  to  issue  such  rules  and  regulations 
as  he  may  deem  to  be  appropriate  to  carry  out  the  purposes  of  this  section. 

"Sec.  2.  Section  1(b)  of  the  Foreign  Agents  Registration  Act  of  1938,  as 
amended  (56  Stat.  248),  is  amended  by  adding  thereto  a  new  paragraph  (6)  to 
read  as  follows: 

"  '  (6)  A  domestic  partnership,  association,  corporation,  organization,  or  other 
combination  of  individuals,  supervised,  directed,  controlled,  or  financed,  in  whole 
or  in  substantial  part,  by  any  foreign  government  or  foreign  political  party;'. 

"Sec.  3.  Section  3(d)  of  such  Act  is  amended  to  read  as  follows: 

"  '(d)  Any  person  engaging  or  agreeing  to  engage  only  in  private  and  non- 
political  financial  or  mercantile  activities  in  furtherance  of  the  bona  fide  trade  or 
commerce  of  such  foreign  principal  or  in  the  soliciting  or  collecting  of  funds  and 
contributions  within  the  United  States  to  be  used  only  for  medical  aid  and  assist- 
ance, or  for  food  and  clothing  to  relieve  human  suffering,  if  such  solicitation  or 
collection  of  funds  and  contributions  is  in  accordance  with  and  subject  to  the  pro- 
visions of  the  Act  of  November  4,  1939,  as  amended  (54  Stat.  48),  and  any  such 
rules  and  regulations  as  may  be  prescribed  thereunder;'." 

Amend  the  title  to  read  as  follows: 

"To  provide  for  notification  that  foreign  mail  may  contain  unsolicited  Com- 
munist propaganda,  and  for  other  purposes." 


Notice  With  Respect  to  Communist  Propaganda 

Unsolicited  Communist  propaganda  is  being  mailed  to  persons  in  this  country 
from  the  Soviet  Union,  the  Soviet  bloc  countries,  and  other  places  outside  the 
United  States.  Such  propaganda  is  one  means  of  attempting  to  promote  the 
objectives  of  the  international  Communist  movement. 

In  order  to  achieve  maximum  impact,  this  material  is  generally  sent  to  unsus- 
pecting addressees  in  no  way  associated  with,  or  sympathetic  to,  Communist 
objectives.  Since  it  is  not  labeled  as  to  its  true  source  or  content,  it  is  not  always 
easy  to  identify. 

If  you  have  received  unsolicited  mail  from  abroad,  it  may  contain  such  propa- 
ganda.   If  you  wish,  you  may  return  it  to  your  local  post  office  without  charge. 

Further  information  concerning  Communist  propaganda  activities  may  be 
obtained  by  writing  to  the  Postmaster  General  or  to  your  Senator  or  Congressman. 

(Note. — The  foregoing  is  a  suggested  sample  notice  which  might  have  to  be 
varied  in  accordance  with  new  developments  and  experience.) 

Mr.  NiTTLE.  Mr.  Katzenbach,  in  the  proposal  for  revision  of  H.R. 
9120  which  you  have  submitted,  you  approached  this  matter  from  the 
standpoint  of  an  authorization  to  the  Postmaster  General  to  publicize 
the  fact  that  certain  quantities  of  Communist  propaganda  are  being 
mailed  into  this  country  from  abroad.  Would  you  have  any  objection 
to  the  substitution  of  the  word  "directed"  for  "authorized"?  That 
would  seem  to  have  the  effect  of  making  it  mandatory  upon  the  Post- 
master General  to  take  certain  action,  which  appears  in  the  draft  to 
be  merely  an  authorization. 

Mr.  Katzenbach.  I  would  have  no  objection  to  that. 

Mr.  NiTTLE.  If  we  were  to  suggest  that  the  form  of  the  notice  should 
include  a  copy  of  subsection  (a)  of  H.R.  9120,  together  with  a  copy  of 
section  2,  title  1,  of  the  Internal  Security  Act  of  1950,  would  you  find 
that  proposal  satisfactory? 


AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    1950      131 

Mr.  Katzenbach.  I  would  have  no  objection  to  that  proposal.  I 
assume,  Mr.  Nittle,  that  your  reference  there  is  merely  to  the  notice 
which  is  given  to  the  recipients,  not  the  notice  which  is  posted.  I 
think  all  of  that  contained  on  the  notice  which  was  posted  would  be 
rather  more  than  would  be  desirable  in  a  poster. 

Mr.  Nittle.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Are  there  any  other  views  that  the  Department  of 
Justice  desires  to  present? 

Mr.  Katzenbach,  No,  I  think  not,  Mr.  Tavenner. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  We  will  be  pleased  to  have  the  views  of^the  Post 
Office  Department. 

REPORT  OF  THE  POST  OFFICE  DEPARTMENT 

Mr.  Doyle.  Mr.  Chairman,  we  adopt  and  support  the  views 
expressed  by  the  Department  of  Justice.  If  either  the  bills  H.R. 
5751  or  H.R.  9120  are  amended  as  suggested  by  the  Department  of 
Justice,  we  would  support  the  legislation.  We  are  all,  I  think,  agreed 
on  the  principle  involved  in  these  bills  as  of  today,  and  the  only 
apparent  disagreement  is  on  language.  We  think  that  the  Depart- 
ment of  Justice's  views  and  versions  granted  to  us  a  flexibility  which 
we  need.  We  prefer  not  to  be  bound  to  sending  this  notice  to  every 
person  who  receives  a  publication  from  a  Communist -bloc  country. 
We  would  prefer,  if  at  all  possible,  to  be  in  a  position  of  determining 
that  there  is  an  unusual  concentration  of  this  mail  addressed  to  a 
given  locality  in  the  country,  to  be  in  the  position  of  blanketing  the 
same  area  with  this  notice  under  routines  which  we  have  available 
to  us.  This  type  of  program  and  scheme  would  make  it  unnecessary 
for  us  to  prepare  a  huge  mailing  list,  each  day  of  the  year  and  cover 
that  mailing  list.  We  Imow  that  in  our  service  a  letter  carrier  serves 
a  certain  number  of  patrons.  We  could  give  these  letter  carriers 
enough  of  these  notices  so  that  they  could  deposit  one  in  each  letter 
box  that  they  serve  during  the  day.  This  would  blanket  the  country 
eventually  instead  of  just  concentrating  on  those  people  who  have 
been  sent  this  material,  much  of  which  they  do  not  want. 

The  Justice  Department  version  would  give  us  that  flexibility. 
It  would  permit  us  to  publish  notices  on  bulletin  boards  and  mail 
specific  notices  to  specific  addresses  if  we  want  to. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Under  the  suggestions  made  by  the  Department  of 
Justice,  you  could,  and  nevertheless  would,  transfer  or  transmit  the 
type  of  notice  agreed  upon  where  the  foreign  mail  was  being  con- 
sistently received  by  individuals? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Certainly. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Even  though  it  might  not  be  in  an  area  of  the 
country  where  there  is  any  special  or  unusual  movement  of  this  foreign 
material? 

Mr.  Doyle.  Yes. 

I  would  also  say,  too,  that  we  subscribe  to  the  answers  that  Mr. 
Katzenbach  made  to  Mr.  Nittle's  questions  to  a  revision  of  some  of 
the  language.  If  the  committee  directs  that  we  send  certain  portions 
of  the  law  itself,  we  would  not  find  that  objectionable.  We  do  not 
object  to  being  directed  to  do  this  rather  than  merely  being  authorized. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Do  you  have  any  comment  to  make  upon  the  form 
of  the  notice  suggested  in  the  revised  bill,  H.R.  9120? 


132      AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    19  50 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  find  very  little  difference,  frankly,  in  the  notice  or 
the  form  of  notice  suggested  in  the  revision  of  H.R.  9120,  and  the  form 
of  the  notice  suggested  by  the  Department  of  Justice.  There  are 
one  or  two  sentences  that  vary  but  in  general  I  think  these  notices 
are  in  effect  the  same  and  we  could  adopt  tliosc. 

Mr.  N"iTTLE.  I  would  like  to  note  that  in  the  proposal  for  revision 
of  H.R.  9120,  presented  by  the  Department  of  Justice,  the  Postmaster 
is  authorized  to  publicize  the  facts  "by  appropriate  notices  to  be 
posted  in  post  offices  or  sent  to  recipients  of  foreign  mail."  It 
seems  to  be  an  alternative  authorization  to  the  Postmaster.  Is  it  not 
the  thought  that  the  posting  of  notices  in  all  post  offices  should  be 
mandatory  in  any  event,  but  that  notification  to  recipients  of  mail 
should  also  be  sent  under  certain  appropriate  circumstances?  Is  it 
not  contemplated  that  notices  should  be  posted  in  post  offices,  and  also 
some  form  of  notice  transmitted  to  the  recipient  of  sucii  mail  in 
appropriate  cases? 

Mr.  Tavexner.  That  was  my  view  of  what  was  proposed  to  be  done. 
How  would  you  make  certain  that  that  is  the  proper  interpretation? 

Mr.  Katzenbach.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  it  becomes  a  directive 
rather  than  an  authorization  as  suggested  in  the  language  of  Mr. 
Nittle,  I  think  that  should  perhaps  be  cleared  up  with  some  additional 
language,  making  the  posting  of  notices  mandatory  because  leaving 
the  Postmaster  General  the  kind  of  discretion  we  already  discussed 
regarding  the  time,  person,  and  so  forth,  of  the  sending  of  notices.  I 
think  in  view  of  the  word  "directed"  we  should  clarify  that  language 
accordingly. 

Mr.  Nittle.  Would  you  suggest  appropriate  language  that  would 
be  acceptable  to  your  Department? 

Mr.  Katzenbach.  Yes.  I  hate  to  try  to  do  it  immediately  off 
the  top  of  my  head  but  I  will  suggest  that  to  the  committee. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  We  would  like  to  hear  from  the  Bureau  of  Customs. 

REPORT  OF  THE  BUREAU  OF  CUSTOMS,  TREASURY  DEPART- 
MENT 

Mr.  RiTGER.  I  have  a  department  report  on  H.R.  9120  which  we 
had  prepared  yesterday  after  I  received  the  copy  yesterday  morning. 
I  think  the  operative  paragraph  in  this  report  which  I  would  be  glad 
to  give  to  you  applies  to  both  the  draft  of  H.R.  9120  and  the  Justice 
Department  amendment.  If  I  could  read  that  one  paragraph,  I 
think  that  would  suffice  for  this  point: 

Since  the  bill  does  not  require  any  functions  to  be  performed  by  tlie  Treasury 
Department,  it  is  not  a  matter  of  our  primary  interest.  To  the  extent  if  any  that 
our  facilities  may  be  called  upon  to  assist  in  administration  of  the  bill,  the  Treasury 
Department  of  course  will  be  pleased  to  cooperate. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Mr.  Chairman,  we  would  like  to  file  the  report  of 
Robert  H.  Knight,  General  Counsel  of  the  Treasury  Department, 
presented  by  Mr.  Ritger. 

Chairman  Walters.  Without  objection,  the  report  will  be  made  a 
part  of  the  record.     It  will  be  read  into  the  record  at  this  point. 

(The  statement  referred  to  is  as  follows :) 


AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    195  0       133 

Report  of  the  General  Counsel,  Treasury  Department 

This  refers  to  your  informal  request  for  the  views  of  this  Department  on  H.R. 
9120,  to  amend  the  Subversive  Activities  Control  Act  of  1950  so  as  to  recjuire  the 
Postmaster  General  in  certain  areas  to  give  notice  of  the  use  of  the  mails  for  the 
dissemination  of  Communist  propaganda. 

The  bill  would  amend  the  Subversive  Activities  Control  Act  of  1950  to  require 
the  Postmaster  General  in  certain  cases  to  give  written  notice  by  mail  of  the  use 
of  the  mails  for  the  dissemination  of  Communist  propaganda  to  the  addressees 
of  material  which  contains,  or  which  the  Postmaster  General  has  reason  to  believe 
may  contain,  such  propaganda.  The  notice  is  to  be  prepared  by  the  Postmaster 
General  and  transmitted  to  addressees  under  such  circumstances  and  in  accordance 
with  such  rules  and  regulations  as  the  Postmaster  General  shall  prescribe. 

Since  the  bill  does  not  require  any  functions  to  be  performed  by  the  Treasury 
Department,  it  is  not  a  matter  of  our  primary  interest.  To  the  extent,  if  any, 
that  our  facilities  may  be  called  upon  to  assist  in  administration  of  the  bill,  the 
Treasury  Department,  of  course,  will  be  pleased  to  cooperate. 

The  Department  has  been  advised  by  the  Bureau  of  the  Budget  that  there  is 
no  objection  from  the  standpoint  of  the  administration's  program  to  the  sub- 
mission of  this  report  to  your  committee. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Mr.  Doyle,  will  you  state  for  the  record,  please,  what 
in  your  opinion  the  cost  of  the  execution  of  such  a  statute  would  be 
to  the  Government  as  compared  with  the  expense  of  administering 
the  duties  performed  by  the  Government  prior  to  March  7,  1961? 

Mr.  Doyle.  I  have  no  facts  with  me  this  morning  which  would 
enable  me  to  make  anything  other  than  an  estimate.  I  do  not  know 
whether  that  woidd  be  good  or  bad.  I  do  believe,  knowing  the 
volume  of  work  that  w^as  performed  under  the  program  as  it  existed 
prior  to  March  17  by  Customs  and  Post  Office — I  do  believe  that  this 
tA'pe  of  program  would  not  be  more  costly. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  Justice  has  presented  for  consideration  revised 
language  to  cover  the  point  raised  by  Mr.  Nittle  regarding  the  posting 
of  notices  in  post  offices  and  sending  notices  to  recipients  of  foreign 
mail. 

It  is  in  the  following  language: 

(1)  to  publicize  such  fact  (A)  by  appropriate  notices  to  be  posted  in  post 
offices,  and  (B)  by  notifying,  whenever  he  deems  it  appropriate  to  promote 
the  purposes  of  this  section,  recipients  of  mail,  that  unsolicited  foreign  mail 
may  contain  such  propaganda  and  (2)  to  permit — 

And  so  forth. 

If  there  are  no  further  comments  or  questions,  that  w^ill  conclude 
our  session  today. 

Mr.  ScHERER.  I  suggest  that  the  final  draft  be  drawn  so  as  to  be 
broad  enough  to  cover  all  situations  where  domestic  mail  is  utilized  to 
convej^  foreign  propaganda — to  cover,  for  example,  such  cases  as 
where  foreign  propaganda  is  shipped  by  freight  from  abroad  and  then 
here  introduced  into  the  domestic  mail. 

Mr.  Tavenner.  That  is  an  excellent  suggestion  and  will  be  incor- 
porated in  the  final  draft. 

(The  committee  recessed  at  11 :35  a.m.,  to  reconvene  subject  to  the 
call  of  the  Chair.) 


APPENDIX 


After  further  consideration,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  prepared  a  final  draft  of  the  proposed  legislation,  to  which 
there  was  no  objection,  by  the  appropriate  executive  departments, 
as  set  forth  in  a  supplemental  report.  Report  309,  part  2,  filed  by  the 
chairman,  Mr.  Walter,  on  September  14,  1961.  This  supplemental 
report  proposed  an  amendment  to  the  bill  H.R.  5751,  which  was 
passed  by  the  House  September  18,  1961.  Portions  of  the  report 
follow  for  ready  reference : 

Mr.   Walter,  from  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  submitted  the 

following 

SUPPLEMENTAL  REPORT 
[To  accompany  H.R.  5751] 

Since  the  filing  of  the  Report  No.  309,  on  April  26,  1961,  to  accompany  H.R. 
5751,  changes  have  been  suggested  in  the  bill  which  are  proposed  to  be  incor- 
porated by  way  of  amendments. 

For  the  information  of  the  Members  of  the  House  of  Representatives  the 
amendments  are  as  follows: 

Strike  out  all  after  the  enacting  clause  and  insert: 

"That  the  Subversive  Activities  Control  Act  of  1950  is  amended  by  inserting 
immediately  after  section  10  thereof  the  following  new  section: 

"  'notice  with  respect  to  communist  propaganda  distributed  by  mail 

"  'Sec.  10 a.  In  order  to  alert  the  recipients  of  mail  and  the  general  public  to  the 
fact  that  large  quantities  of  Communist  propaganda  are  being  introduced  into 
this  country  from  abroad  and  disseminated  in  the  United  States  by  means  of  the 
United  States  mails,  the  Postmaster  General  shall  publicize  such  fact  (1)  by 
appropriate  notices  posted  in  Post  Offices,  and  (2)  by  notifying  recipients  of  mail, 
whenever  he  deems  it  appropriate  in  order  to  carry  out  the  purposes  of  this  section, 
that  the  United  States  mails  may  contain  such  propaganda.  The  Postmaster 
General  shall  permit  the  return  of  mail  containing  such  propaganda  to  local  Post 
Offices,  without  cost  to  the  recipient  thereof.  Nothing  in  this  section  shall  be 
deemed  to  authorize  the  Postmaster  General  to  open,  inspect,  or  censor  any  mail. 
The  Postmaster  General  is  authorized  to  prescribe  such  regulations  as  he  may 
deem  appropriate  to  carry  out  the  purposes  of  this  section.'  " 

Amend  the  title  so  as  to  read: 

"A  bill  to  amend  the  Subversive  Activities  Control  Act  of  1950  so  as  to  provide 
for  notification  that  the  United  States  mails  may  contain  Communist  propaganda 
introduced  into  the  United  States  from  abroad,  and  for  other  purposes." 

4c  4:  4<  4=  =1°  4=  4: 

committee  recommendations 

Upon  publication  of  notices  required  by  this  amended  bill,  and  as  a  result  of 
notification  to  recipients  of  mail,  members  of  the  public  may  make  inquiry  of 
the  Post  Office  Department  for  further  information  concerning  Communist 
propaganda  activities.  It  is  suggested  that  the  Postmaster  General  prepare  and 
make  available  appropriate  pamphlets  or  material  for  this  purpose  which  may 

135 


136      AMEND    SUBVERSIVE    ACTIVITIES    CONTROL    ACT    OF    1950 

include  information  contained  in  this  committee  report.  It  is  also  suggested  that 
the  notice  to  recipients  of  mail  may  include  the  following  language: 

"Unsolicited  Communist  propaganda  is  being  disseminated  by  mail  and  other 
means  to  persons  in  this  country  from  the  Soviet  Union,  the  Soviet-bloc  countries, 
Cuba,  and  other  places  outside  the  United  States.  Such  propaganda  is  one 
means  of  attempting  to  promote  the  objectives  of  the  international  Communist 
movement.  Propaganda  is  regarded  by  the  Communists  as  an  important  and 
necessary  means  for  achieving  the  subversion  of  the  free  world.  In  order  to 
effect  maximum  impact,  this  material  is  generally  sent  to  unsuspecting  addresses 
in  no  way  associated  with  or  sympathetic  to,  Communist  objectives.  Since  it  is 
not  labeled  as  to  its  true  source  or  content,  it  is  not  always  easy  to  identify.  The 
privacy  of  your  mail  continues  to  be  respected  by  your  Government  and  by  the 
postal  service.     This  letter  is  forwarded  for  your  information. 

"If  you  have  received  unsolicited  mail  from  abroad,  it  may  contain  such 
propaganda.  If  you  wish,  you  may  return  it  to  your  local  post  office  without 
charge. 

"Further  information  concerning  Communist  propaganda  activities  may  be 
obtained  by  writing  to  the  Postmaster  General  or  to  your  Senator  or  Con- 
gressman." 

o 


BOSTON  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 


3  9999  05706  3107