Skip to main content

Full text of "Hindus of the Himalayas"

See other formats


• 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2011  with  funding  from 

LYRASIS  Members  and  Sloan  Foundation 


http://www.archive.org/details/hindusofhimalayaOOinberr 


Hindus 

of 

the 

Himalayas 


Berkeley  and  Los  Angeles 


Hindus 


of 


the 


Himalayas 


BY  GERALD  D.  BERREMAN 


UNI  VERSITY  OF   CALIFORNIA   PRESS       1963 


UNIVERSITY    OF    CALIFORNIA   PRESS 

BERKELEY    AND    LOS    ANGELES,    CALIFORNIA 

CAMBRIDGE    UNIVERSITY    PRESS 

LONDON,    ENGLAND 

(C)    1963    BY    THE   REGENTS   OF   THE    UNIVERSITY    OF   CALIFORNIA 

LIBRARY    OF    CONGRESS    CATALOG    CARD    NUMBER:    63-IO463 

PRINTED    IN    THE    UNITED    STATES    OF    AMERICA 


To  My  Mother  and  Father 


Acknowledgments 


This  book  is  based  upon  research  first  reported  in  my  dissertation, 
presented  to  the  faculty  of  the  Graduate  School  of  Cornell  University, 
in  September,  1959.  I  am  grateful  to  Professor  Morris  E.  Opler  for  his 
interest  and  suggestions  in  supervising  the  preparation  of  the  disserta- 
tion and  for  his  encouragement  thereafter  to  revise  and  publish  it. 
Others  who  provided  helpful  advice  include  Professors  Allan  R.  Holm- 
berg,  Lauriston  Sharp,  Robert  J.  Smith,  and  Robin  M.  Williams.  Mr. 
J.  Michael  Mahar  and  Professor  S.  C.  Dube  gave  liberally  of  helpful 
counsel  before  the  research  was  undertaken.  Mr.  A.  C.  Chandola  re- 
viewed linguistic  and  other  materials  in  the  course  of  the  final  revision. 
Mr.  James  M.  Sebring  checked  census  figures  and  numerous  biblio- 
graphic references  and  helped  in  proofreading.  To  all  these  people  I 
am  grateful. 

The  Ford  Foundation,  through  its  Foreign  Area  Training  Fellow- 
ship program,  financed  nearly  three  years  of  work  which  led  to  the 
dissertation,  including  15  months  in  India  during  1957-1958,  and  six 
months  of  analysis  and  writing  following  the  research.  Library  re- 
search and  substantial  rewriting  in  the  preparation  of  this  book  were 
supported  by  a  University  of  California  Summer  Faculty  Research 
Fellowship  and  by  part-time  research  appointments  with  the  Himalayan 
Border  Countries  Research  Project  and  the  South  Asia  Village  Studies 
Project  in  the  Center  for  South  Asia  Studies  of  the  Institute  of  Inter- 
national Studies,  University  of  California,  Berkeley.  Dr.  Joan  V.  Bondu- 
rant,  then  chairman  of  the  Center  for  South  Asia  Studies,  Dr.  Leo  E. 


Vlll 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


Rose,  head  of  the  Himalayan  Border  Countries  Research  Project,  and 
Dr.  William  L.  Rowe,  my  colleague  in  the  South  Asia  Village  Studies 
Project,  have  been  encouraging  and  helpful  in  this  research.  The  De- 
partment of  Anthropology  at  the  University  of  California,  Berkeley, 
has  been  cooperative  in  accommodating  to  my  part-time  research  ap- 
pointments. I  wish  to  thank  all  of  these  individuals  and  institutions  for 
their  material  and  moral  support. 

My  family  and  I  are  indebted  to  many  people  who  were  kind  and 
helpful  to  us  in  India,  especially  to  Mr.  and  Mrs.  James  Alters,  Mr. 
and  Mrs.  Leon  Elliott,  Mr.  and  Mrs.  T.  D.  Fordham,  and  Mr.  and  Mrs. 
J.  Suvanto  and  their  families,  all  of  whom  were  friends  in  need.  In  my 
research  I  benefited  greatly  from  the  assistance  of  Mr.  A.  P.  Sharma  and 
Mr.  M.  Basir.  Mr.  Basir's  unfailing  interest  and  untiring  efficiency  were 
important  factors  in  the  success  of  the  research. 

I  am  immeasurably  indebted  to  my  wife,  Evelyn,  who  bore  with  good 
humor  the  difficulties  of  life  under  trying  circumstances;  who  managed 
our  household,  cared  for  our  small  daughter  in  health  and  illness,  and 
typed  untold  hundreds  of  pages  of  reference  material  and  notes — all 
while  I  was  preoccupied  with  research  and  most  of  the  time  while  I 
was  physically  absent.  Our  daughter,  Janet,  shared  without  complaint 
the  unstable  life  of  the  field  anthropologist's  family  and  the  crises, 
maladies,  and  discomforts  inherent  therein  (and  several  not  inherent 
therein).  Few  families  are  called  upon  to  endure  what  they  endured, 
and  they  did  so  with  a  grace  deserving  of  respect  and  my  deepest 
gratitude. 

Finally,  I  am  grateful  to  the  people  of  Sirkanda,  without  whose 
trust,  friendship,  and  forbearance  the  research  would  have  been  im- 
possible. In  particular  I  appreciate  the  kindness  and  understanding  of 
my  friends,  Alam  Singh  and  Safri. 


Contents 


Introduction  1 

1 

The  Setting  9 

2 

The  Economic  Context  38 


The  Religious  Context:  The  Supernatural  80 

4 

The  Religious  Context:  Calendrical  and  Life-Cycle 

Ceremonies  121 

5 

Kin  Groups  and  Kinship  143 

6 

Caste  197 

7 
Intercaste  Relations  229 


CONTENTS 


8 

The  Village  Community 


259 


The  Outside  World:   Urban  Contacts  and  Government 

Programs  294 


10 

Conclusion 

Bibliography 

Appendixes 

I.     Gods  Worshiped  in  Sirkanda 
II.     Calendrical  Rites  in  Sirkanda 

III.  Life-Cycle  Rites  in  Sirkanda 

IV.  Sirkanda  Kin  Terms 

Notes 
Index 


339 
359 

369 

388 

395 
410 

415 

423 


MAPS 


1.  Linguistic  and  administrative  environs  of  Sirkanda  13 

2.  Sirkanda  marriage  network  and  chans  24 

3.  Sirkanda  village  settlement  area  25 


He  who  thinks  on  Himachal,  though  he  should  not  be- 
hold him,  is  greater  than  he  who  performs  all  worship  in  Kashi. 
In  a  hundred  ages  of  the  gods  I  could  not  tell  thee  of  the  glories 
of  Himachal.  As  the  dew  is  dried  up  by  the  morning  sun,  so 
are  the  sins  of  mankind  by  the  sight  of  Himachal. 

SKANDA    PURANA 


NotC  ON    HINDI    TERMS 


English  equivalents  have  in  most  instances  been  substituted  for  Hindi 
and  Pahari  terms.  Where  pertinent,  the  Hindi  or  Pahari  word  has 
been  included  in  parentheses.  Where  a  Hindi  or  Pahari  term  has 
seemed  more  appropriate  than  an  English  one,  it  has  been  italicized 
and  denned  (if  it  is  not  denned  by  context)  in  its  first  appearance. 
Such  words  have  been  written  as  nearly  phonetically  as  possible,  accord- 
ing to  Sirkanda  pronunciation,  in  Roman  script,  with  long  vowels  (— ) 
and  nasalization  (~)  indicated  in  their  first  appearance.  Retroflex  con- 
sonants have  been  indicated  by  capitalization  in  their  first  appear- 
ance. Pluralization  has  usually  been  indicated  as  in  English  with  a 
final  "s"  rather  than  as  in  Hindi.  Some  words  which  appear  frequently 
in  English  writings  are  spelled  in  the  conventional  manner  rather  than 
phonetically,  especially  if  they  are  proper  nouns. 

Place  names  of  villages  within  the  immediate  vicinity  of  Sirkanda 
and  all  personal  names  of  individuals  (except  those  in  the  Acknowl- 
edgments) are  pseudonyms.  "Sirkanda"  is  not  the  name  of  a  real 
village,  though  it  is  the  name  of  a  well-known  Pahari  temple  dedi- 
cated to  Devi,  the  most  important  goddess  in  the  village  described 
here.  The  employment  of  pseudonyms  is  done  for  protection  of  privacy 
rather  than  for  concealment.  Anyone  who  set  about  it  could  easily 
locate  "Sirkanda." 


INTRODUCTION 


In  India,  as  in  peasant  societies  elsewhere,  the  village  community  has 
been  found  by  many  anthropologists  to  be  the  most  manageable  unit 
for  ethnological  research.  As  a  result  of  their  experience  no  one  would 
now  be  likely  to  assert  that  the  village  is  isolated,  independent,  or  un- 
changing, or  that  it  can  be  studied  meaningfully  without  reference  to 
its  past  and  its  extensions  into  other  communities,  towns,  and  urban 
centers.  In  fact,  dependence  upon  market  towns  or  urban  areas  is 
inherent  in  most  definitions  of  peasant  communities.  Redfield,  for 
example,  describes  the  peasant  as  a  "rural  native  whose  long  estab- 
lished order  of  life  takes  important  account  of  the  city.  The  account 
that  the  peasant  takes  of  the  city  or  town  is  economic,  political  and 
moral"  (Redfield,  1957,  p.  31). 

Although  no  peasant  village  can  be  understood  in  isolation,  it  can 
serve  as  a  useful  focus  for  research.  A  village,  with  its  extensions  into 
the  surrounding  region,  constitutes  a  functioning  segment  of  rural 
Indian  society  of  a  size  amenable  to  anthropological  research  tech- 
niques. Although  no  village  is  representative  of  rural  India  as  a  whole, 
any  village  properly  understood  represents  in  a  general  way  villages 
of  a  particular  type  and  area.  Dube  has  commented  that  "what  we 
need  today  is  a  series  of  studies  of  village  communities  from  different 
parts  of  the  country  covering  the  many  divergent  patterns  of  organiza- 
tion and  ethos.  Until  this  is  done  our  picture  of  social  systems  in  rural 
India  will  remain  vague  and  inadequate"  (Dube,  1955,  pp.  6  f.).  Only 
then  will  we  be  able  to  assess  the  validity  of  generalizations  already 


2  INTRODUCTION 

set  forth  on  the  subject.  The  present  study  is,  among  other  things,  a 
contribution  in  this  direction. 

The  research  reported  here  was  in  the  nature  of  a  community  study 
carried  out  from  September,  1957,  through  August,  1958,  in  and  around 
Sirkanda,1  a  village  of  the  lower  Himalayas  of  western  Uttar  Pradesh, 
India. 

The  aims  of  the  study  were  three:  (1)  to  provide  an  ethnographic 
community  study  in  an  important  and  previously  unreported  culture 
area  of  India;  (2)  to  analyze  the  functioning  and  interrelationship  of 
kin,  caste,  and  community  ties  in  a  Hindu  society  known  to  be  dif- 
ferently organized  in  some  significant  respects  than  those  of  the  ad- 
jacent and  well-known  plains;  and  (3)  to  study  the  effects  of  recent 
governmental  programs  and  other  outside  contacts  on  a  relatively 
isolated  and  conservative  Indian  community. 

The  area  selected  for  the  research  was  the  hill  region  near  the  town 
of  Dehra  Dun.  It  was  chosen  over  other,  equally  promising  hill  regions 
because  of  ease  of  access,  availability  of  competent  medical  care,  and 
adequate  housing  in  nearby  Dehra  Dun — features  lacking  in  many 
hill  areas  but  important  in  view  of  my  plan  to  take  my  wife  and  in- 
fant daughter.  Other  factors  were  that  I  had  an  advance  contact  with 
a  potential  interpreter  in  the  town  of  Dehra  Dun  and  that  town,  as 
district  headquarters  and  an  educational  center,  had  useful  libraries 
and  other  documentary  resources.  The  particular  locality  and  com- 
munity were  chosen  as  suitable  in  terms  of  the  combined  requirements 
of  the  type  of  community  to  be  investigated,  the  plan  of  the  research, 
and  the  necessity  of  remaining  within  a  reasonable  distance  of  the 
facilities  of  Dehra  Dun. 

In  selecting  a  site  for  the  research,  I  visited  some  25  villages  over  a 
period  of  two  months,  both  in  the  hills  and  in  the  Dehra  Dun  valley 
bordering  the  hills.  Sirkanda,  a  village  ten  air  miles  from  Dehra  Dun, 
was  attractive  in  that  it  was  large  for  a  hill  village,  was  fairly  isolated 
but  accessible,  had  a  caste  distribution  typical  of  the  area,  and  had  no 
apparent  important  atypical  features.  During  the  period  of  research 
I  lived  most  of  the  time  in  Sirkanda  and  simultaneously  maintained 
a  house  in  Dehra  Dun  or,  for  the  last  four  months,  in  the  nearby  hill 
town  of  Mussoorie.  Except  on  visits  to  the  village,  my  family  occupied 
the  house  in  town.  My  characteristic  routine  during  the  research 
period  was  to  spend  four  or  five  days  in  the  village  followed  by  two 
days  in  town.  This  provided  a  weekly  opportunity  to  type  notes,  con- 
sult library  resources  and  official  records,  secure  supplies,  and  get 
needed  rest. 

In  addition  to  my  residence  in  Sirkanda,  I  had  fairly  extensive  con- 


INTRODUCTION  3 

tacts  with  other  hill  villages  in  the  immediate  area.  I  passed  through 
other  villages  and  intermediary  markets  en  route  to  and  from  Sir- 
kanda,  and  I  paid  occasional  visits  to  surrounding  villages,  often  in 
the  company  of  Sirkanda  villagers.  Contrasting  hill  regions  were  ob- 
served in  two  treks,  one  from  Simla  to  Chakrata,  a  no-mile  trip  in 
Himachal  Pradesh  and  Jaunsar-Bawar,  to  the  west.  The  other  was 
from  Mussoorie  east  to  Tehri,  a  40-mile  trip  through  the  heart  of  the 
culture  area  represented  by  the  people  of  Sirkanda.  From  these  con- 
tacts and  similar  ones  in  the  Dehra  Dun  valley,  I  gained  a  first-hand 
perspective  on  the  place  of  Sirkanda  in  its  own  culture  area  and  its 
relation  to  neighboring  ones. 

Living  conditions  in  the  village  were  primitive  even  by  local  stand- 
ards— a  fact  which  led  me  to  reject  the  idea  of  moving  my  family  there 
on  a  full-time  basis.  Except  for  a  period  of  about  four  months  when  I 
owned  an  unreliable  jeep  and  could  drive  by  a  devious  route  to  within 
five  miles  of  the  village,  access  from  Dehra  Dun  was  by  a  foot  trail  nine 
miles  beyond  the  end  of  a  bus  line.  The  last  five-mile  distance  to  the 
village  was  along  a  mountain  trail  climbing  2,700  feet.  Access  from 
Mussoorie,  location  of  my  "town  house"  for  the  last  four  months,  was 
by  a  relatively  level,  but  in  places  extremely  rough,  trail  of  16  miles. 
My  village  house  consisted  of  three  small  connecting  rooms,  one  of 
which  was  occupied  continuously  by  two  to  four  water  buffalo,  and  all 
of  which  were  inferior  to  those  inhabited  by  most  villagers.  The  only 
food  consistently  available  in  the  village  was  grain,  milk,  sugar,  and 
tea.  The  source  of  water  was  one-fourth  of  a  mile  distant  over  a  rocky 
trail.  In  short,  Sirkanda  was  not  suitable  for  protracted  family  living 
by  outsiders. 

Throughout  the  research  the  services  of  an  interpreter  were  utilized. 
The  language  of  the  people  is  the  Central  dialect  of  the  language  group 
known  as  Pahari.  This  is  related  to  Hindi,  and  most  villagers  knew 
Hindi  well.  I  knew  elementary  Hindi  and  was  able  to  carry  on  or- 
dinary conversation  and  to  comprehend  much  of  what  was  being  said 
by  informants.  However,  for  research  purposes  an  assistant  conversant 
with  the  language  was  needed.  Two  interpreters  worked  with  me  con- 
secutively. 

Problems  of  the  research,  especially  as  it  was  affected  by  the  con- 
trasting personal  and  social  characteristics  of  these  two  men,  have  been 
the  subject  of  a  short  monograph  (Berreman,  1962c).  Suffice  it  to  say 
here  that  villagers  were  at  first  suspicious  of  us  and  our  motives.  The 
nature  of  the  rapport  we  established  and  consequently  of  the  informa- 
tion we  obtained  was  heavily  influenced  by  the  villagers'  perceptions 
of  us.  The  first  interpreter,  a  young  Brahmin,  was  helpful  in  establish- 


A  INTRODUCTION 

ing  friendly  relations  but,  partly  because  of  his  status  as  a  Brahmin  of 
plains  origin,  he  inhibited  people  in  their  presentation  of  themselves 
to  us.  Villagers  are  self-conscious  about  many  of  their  religious  and 
social  practices,  which  are  unorthodox  and  even  defiling  by  plains 
standards.  They  were  anxious  to  conceal  these  from  the  young  Brahmin 
in  order  to  secure  his  respect.  When  it  unexpectedly  became  necessary 
to  find  a  replacement  as  interpreter,  a  retired  Muslim  schoolteacher 
was  employed.  Although  his  religion  prevented  him  from  achieving 
close  friendship  with  most  high-caste  villagers,  he  won  remarkably 
good  rapport  with  villagers  of  low  caste  who,  in  any  case,  were  the 
best  informants.  Moreover,  neither  he  nor  the  villagers  felt  compelled 
to  impress  one  another  with  their  status  or  ritual  purity.  This  led  to 
more  candid  information  and  observation  among  all  groups  than  had 
been  possible  when  the  Brahmin  was  present. 

The  primary  sources  of  data  were  Sirkanda  villagers  themselves. 
Initially  they  were,  as  a  result  of  their  suspicions,  an  unreliable  source, 
and  many  of  the  data  obtained  were  in  the  nature  of  half-truths.  In 
the  beginning  there  was  consistent  suppression  of  many  kinds  of  in- 
formation, especially  that  which  the  villagers  felt  reflected  adversely 
on  their  status  as  Hindus,  and  that  which  they  believed  might  result 
in  additional  taxation,  legal  proceedings,  or  other  governmental  in- 
terference. Thus  their  subjects  of  conversation  with  me  were  limited 
to  the  weather,  agricultural  techniques,  and  similarly  innocuous  topics. 
Gradually  we  won  their  confidence  and  they  gave  information  more 
freely.  A  few  individuals  remained  suspicious  and  uncommunicative 
throughout  the  period  of  research;  others  became  friendly  but  not 
informative;  some  became  both  friendly  and  informative.  In  virtually 
all  instances,  however,  it  was  possible  to  check  information  with  two 
or  more  informants.  Most  villagers  were  at  least  occasional  informants. 

Low-caste  people  were  freer  with  most  kinds  of  information  than 
were  high-caste  people,  apparently  because  they  had  a  smaller  stake  in 
the  impressions  others  received  of  them  and  because  they  did  not  feel 
threatened  by  the  anthropologist  and  his  interpreter.  Low-caste  vil- 
lagers contributed  a  relatively  large  amount  of  information  per  capita, 
but  this  was  compensated  for  by  the  greater  numbers  of  high-caste 
informants.  Information  was  always  obtained  from  or  checked  by  those 
in  a  position  to  know  whereof  they  spoke  on  a  particular  topic.  In  the 
year  of  research  there  was  an  opportunity  to  observe  many  events  at 
first  hand.  However,  some  of  those  to  be  described,  and  especially  some 
religious  and  ceremonial  activities,  did  not  occur  in  my  presence.  De- 
scriptions of  such  events  were  obtained  from  people  who  had  par- 
ticipated in  them. 


INTRODUCTION  5 

Information  was  obtained  primarily  from  observation  and  through 
informal  interviews,  both  directed  and  undirected.  Interviews  were 
conducted  wherever  and  whenever  the  occasion  arose — in  my  house 
or  yard,  at  the  houses  of  villagers,  in  the  shops,  at  places  of  work  of 
artisans,  in  the  fields,  at  the  water  source,  on  the  trails,  and  so  on. 
Generally  several  people  were  present  at  once,  contributing  informa- 
tion and  attitudes  and  inhibiting  one  another's  contributions.  Such 
interviews  were  not  recorded  on  the  spot.  At  the  first  opportunity  they 
were  recorded  in  private.  The  approach  could  not  be  called  participant 
observation  because  real  participation  was  a  virtual  impossibility  in 
most  contexts.  My  interpreter  and  I  were  outsiders.  Our  participation 
was  limited  largely  to  informal  social  situations,  and  even  there  we 
were  usually  in  the  role  of  guests,  invited  or  uninvited. 

As  time  passed  villagers  became  interested  in  our  work  and  ac- 
customed to  our  queries,  and  some  were  willing  to  have  interviews  re- 
corded in  their  presence.  This  was  done  in  the  unreliable  privacy  of 
my  village  house.  Some  objective  and  largely  quantitative  types  of 
data  were  gathered,  notebook  in  hand,  from  all  the  villagers  or  from 
a  cross-section.  These  included  genealogical  and  census  materials, 
economic  data,  and  the  like.  Scheduled  interviews  had  been  drawn  up 
to  get  at  attitudes  toward  the  outside  world  and  related  matters,  but 
they  were  discarded.  I  felt,  on  the  basis  of  experience  in  informal  in- 
terviewing and  in  collecting  genealogical  and  other  information,  that 
these  would  do  more  harm  in  terms  of  rapport  than  good  in  terms  of 
reliable  data.  More  was  to  be  gained,  I  believed,  by  getting  this  in- 
formation informally  than  by  drawing  attention  (and  inevitably, 
suspicion)  to  my  interests  by  attempting  a  survey  approach.  This  is  an 
unusually  closed  society,  whose  members  are  accustomed  to  concealing 
and  protecting  themselves  from  the  outside  world.  Data  obtained  by 
survey  techniques  on  matters  about  which  villagers  are  sensitive 
would,  in  all  probability,  have  been  of  little  value  except  as  a  kind  of 
projective  test,  and  any  attempt  to  secure  such  data  would  have  jeo- 
pardized further  research  efforts. 

The  difficulty  of  obtaining  reliable  data  is  reflected  in  the  quality 
of  the  official  statistical  sources  of  information  presumably  available 
on  the  village.  There  are  such  records  as  voting  lists,  birth  and  death 
records,  census  lists,  school  enrollment  lists,  livestock  census,  land 
records,  and  tax  records,  which  provide  neat  statistical  summaries. 
However,  much  of  the  information  is  inaccurate.  On  the  current  voting 
list,  for  example,  142  names  appear  accompanied  by  the  person's  age 
and  name  of  father  or  husband.  Among  these  are  three  people  who 
appear  twice,  at  least  eight  who  are  incorrectly  identified,  seven  who 


6  INTRODUCTION 

are  unidentified,  and  at  least  two  who  appear  also  on  the  voting  list 
of  a  neighboring  village.  The  list  includes  a  mixture  of  full-time  and 
part-time  residents  and  people  who  no  longer  reside  in  the  village, 
while  some  individuals  in  each  of  these  categories  are  missing  from  the 
list.  Ages  given  are  at  best  rough  approximations.  The  village  live- 
stock census  was  conducted  by  a  forestry  officer,  who  was  reported  to 
have  looked  at  the  cattle  in  the  yards  of  one  or  two  houses  and  mul- 
tiplied by  his  guess  as  to  the  number  of  houses  in  the  village.  Land 
records  are  more  accurate,  since  they  are  based  on  measurements,  but 
they  are  inadequate  to  show  current  land  distribution  because  informal 
division  of  land  has  long  gone  unrecorded.  The  man  responsible  for 
recording  births  and  deaths  in  Sirkanda  lives  in  another  village  and 
misses  many  births  and  cases  of  infant  and  child  mortality.  Even  the 
school  enrollment  record  which  is  kept  in  the  village  includes  four 
students  whom  the  teacher  has  never  seen  (these  are  excluded  from  all 
discussions  and  calculations  with  regard  to  the  school  in  later  chapters). 
The  record  fails  to  list  six  students  who  attend  regularly. 

In  view  of  the  difficulties  faced  by  those  responsible  for  keeping 
records  both  in  terms  of  the  reliability  of  their  informants  and  the 
pressure  from  their  superiors,  it  is  remarkable  that  they  do  as  well  as 
they  do.  But  documentary  records  are  less  useful  sources  of  data  for 
research  than  might  be  expected.  Each  type  of  record  has  its  own 
specific  types  of  limitations.  Reliance  upon  such  records  is  misleading 
unless  their  limitations  are  recognized. 

Literature  dealing  with  Central  Pahari-speaking  people  is  extremely 
scarce.  The  earliest  account,  and  an  indispensable  one,  is  G.  W.  Traill's 
"Statistical  Sketch  of  Kamaon"  (1828).  E.  T.  Atkinson's  three-volume 
work,  The  Himalayan  Districts  of  the  North-Western  Provinces  of 
India  (1882-1886),  is  a  comprehensive  and  accurate  report  on  the  area 
and  the  people.  It  is  the  only  such  source,  and  most  subsequent  ac- 
counts rely  heavily  upon  it.  To  these  two  insightful  civil  servants  we 
owe  most  of  what  we  know  of  these  people.  G.  A.  Grierson  in  the 
Linguistic  Survey  of  India  (Vol.  IX,  1916)  provides  invaluable  lin- 
guistic and  historical  data.  E.  S.  Oakley's  Holy  Himalaya  (1905)  also 
contains  interesting  material.  Other  useful  works  are  the  District 
Gazetteers  of  Dehra  Dun,  British  Garhwal,  and  Almora  (the  latter  two 
largely  revisions  of  pertinent  sections  of  Atkinson's  volumes)  by  H.  G. 
Walton  (1911a;  1910;  1911b),  the  Historical  and  Statistical  Memoir 
of  Dehra  Dun  by  G.  R.  C.  Williams  (1874),  and  to  a  lesser  extent  the 
District  Gazetteer  of  Naini  Tal  by  H.  R.  Nevill  (1904). 

An  informative  informal  description  by  one  who  knew  the  people 
well  is  that  of  "Mr.  Wilson  of  Mussoorie,"  contained  in  A  Summer 


INTRODUCTION  7 

Ramble  in  the  Himalayas,  edited  by  Wilson  under  the  nom  de  plume 
of  "the  Mountaineer"  (i860,  pp.  121-232).  Useful  works  by  local  his- 
torians are:  Garhwal,  Ancient  and  Modern,  by  P.  R.  Bahadur  (1916), 
History  of  Garhwal  (in  Hindi)  by  H.  K.  Raturi  (1928),  and  Kumaon 
(in  Hindi)  by  R.  Sankrityayana  (1958).  L.  D.  Joshi  (1929)  compiled  a 
valuable  account  of  customary  law — primarily  family  law — in  the 
Central  Pahari  area,  and  V.  A.  Stowell  (1907)  contributed  a  source 
book  on  land  tenures. 

With  the  exception  of  a  brief  appendix  to  the  Gazetteer  of  British 
Garhwal,  none  of  the  above  deals  specifically  with  Tehri  Garhwal,  the 
administrative  unit  immediately  adjacent,  and  for  many  purposes 
most  relevant,  to  Sirkanda.  The  books  cited  do,  however,  deal  with 
closely  related  peoples  in  neighboring  Garhwal  and  the  Kumaon  dis- 
tricts to  the  east. 

The  Pahari  area  is  populated  by  five  million  Indo-Aryan  speaking 
Hindus.  It  is  famous  as  the  location  of  some  of  the  most  important 
Hindu  shrines,  as  the  setting  for  widely  known  religious  epics,  as  a 
traditional  region  of  retreat  for  religious  figures,  and  as  the  site  of 
many  points  of  historic  interest.  It  is  the  home  of  the  men  who  made 
up  the  Garhwal  Rifles,  who  won  fame  in  two  World  Wars.  It  is  the 
location  of  "hill  stations,"  where  thousands  of  people  from  all  over 
North  India  go  annually  to  escape  the  summer  heat,  and  where  state 
and  national  governments  and  international  political  conferences  have 
met.  It  is  the  source  of  an  increasing  variety  of  natural  resources.  Yet 
it  has  remained  a  virtual  blank  on  the  ethnographic  map  and  is  ig- 
nored by  most  of  those  who  write  about  North  Indian  culture  and 
society. 

The  situation  has  changed  little  since  1935,  when  S.  D.  Pant  noted 
that,  "The  Himalayas  have  for  many  years  constituted  a  subject  of 
such  profound  and  unique  interest,  and  have  attracted  so  distinguished 
a  company  of  explorers  and  investigators,  that  it  seems  all  but  incredible 
that  no  adequate  scientific  account  of  the  human  geography  and  social 
economy  of  the  Himalayans  has  yet  been  written"  (Pant,  1935,  p.  9). 
Pant  himself  has  provided  the  first  exception  to  this  dearth  of  scien- 
tific work  in  the  area  with  his  book,  The  Social  Economy  of  the  Hi- 
malayans, a  valuable  general  survey  of  Almora  and  Naini  Tal  districts 
focusing  upon  the  economy  of  the  Paharis  and  Bhotiyas.  This  is  the 
only  contemporary  study  conducted  even  partially  among  Central 
Pahari-speaking  peoples. 

The  only  Himalayan  hill  people  to  have  attracted  the  attention  of 
Indian  anthropologists  or  sociologists  are  the  polyandrous  residents 
of  Jaunsar-Bawar,   a  small  area  in  Dehra  Dun  District  inhabited  by 


g  INTRODUCTION 

Western  Pahari-speaking  people.  Evidently  attracted  by  unusual  mari- 
tal customs  and  related  features  which  have  led  to  characterization  of 
the  society  as  "a  fossil  of  the  age  of  the  Mahabharata"  (Munshi,  1955, 
p.  i),  D.  N.  Majumdar  and  his  students,  notably  R.  N.  Saksena,  have 
done  some  work  in  that  region  (Majumdar,  1944;  Saksena,  1955). 

Recently  short  reports  of  village  studies  carried  out  in  hill  tracts 
farther  to  the  west,  in  Chamba  and  Kulu,  have  appeared,  by  W.  H. 
Newell  (1955)  and  C.  Rosser  (1955),  respectively,  and  a  book  by  Rosser, 
The  Valley  of  the  Gods,  is  in  press.  The  area  is  certain  to  receive  fur- 
ther attention. 

The  present  study  is,  therefore,  the  first  community  study  or  ethnog- 
raphy attempted  in  the  Central  Pahari  area,  and  one  of  very  few 
studies  of  any  kind  that  have  dealt  with  Himalayan  hill  people.  Be- 
cause of  this  it  has  seemed  worthwhile  to  include  in  this  account  a  good 
deal  of  ethnographic  material  which  could  have  been  omitted  if  it 
were  available  elsewhere.  There  is  no  independent  documentation  for 
much  that  is  presented  here.  Without  documentation  and  cultural 
context,  the  reader  would  be  faced  with  the  problem  which  faced  the 
researcher  in  the  initial  phases  of  his  work — he  might  fail  to  see  ex- 
isting relationships  and  he  might  assume  nonexistent  ones.  The  reader 
familiar  with  India  would  be  especially  likely  to  jump  to  erroneous 
conclusions  about  the  degree  of  similarity  or  difference  between  the 
community  described  here  and  other  Indian  communities  with  which 
he  might  be  acquainted.  This  would  be  likely  to  prejudice  his  estimate 
of  the  credibility  and  applicability  of  the  generalizations,  analyses,  and 
conclusions  presented.  Intelligent  appraisal  can  follow  only  from  data 
presented  in  cultural  context.  For  this  reason  I  have  tried  to  present 
some  of  the  empirical  data  upon  which  these  generalizations,  analyses, 
and  conclusions  are  based. 

The  aims  of  this  book,  then,  are  both  ethnographic  and  analytic:  the 
description  of  an  example  of  a  heretofore  undescribed  culture;  the 
analysis  of  social  organization  in  a  uniquely  organized  caste  society; 
and  the  analysis  of  reactions  to  planned  and  unplanned  change  in  a 
remote  and  unsophisticated  village.  These  aims  have  been  important 
in  determining  the  content  and  manner  of  presentation  of  the  ma- 
terials to  follow. 


THE   SETTING 


The  lower  Himalayas  from  western  Kashmir  to  eastern  Nepal  are 
populated  by  peoples  sharing  common  and  distinct  cultural,  linguistic, 
and  historical  traditions.  This  study  deals  primarily  with  the  inhabit- 
ants of  Sirkanda,  one  village  in  this  broad  culture  area,  and  with  their 
neighbors  and  relatives  in  nearby  villages.  Sirkanda  lies  in  the  Hi- 
malayan foothills  bordering  Dehra  Dun  and  Tehri  Garhwal  districts  in 
Uttar  Pradesh,  India,  125  air  miles  north  and  slightly  east  of  Delhi, 
and  85  miles  southwest  of  the  Tibetan  border.  It  is  about  ten  air  miles 
northeast  of  Dehra  Dun,  a  large  town  situated  in  a  valley  at  the  foot 
of  the  Himalayan  range,  and  seven  miles  east  of  Mussoorie,  a  British- 
built  hill  station  on  the  crest  of  the  first  ridge  of  the  Himalayas  north 
of  Dehra  Dun.  Distances  in  this  region  are  deceptive  because  the  ter- 
rain is  rugged  and  mountainous.  The  only  means  of  travel  within  the 
area  is  by  mountain  trails  which  average  at  least  double  the  air-mile 
distances.  There  are  adults  in  Sirkanda  who  have  never  visited  Dehra 
Dun. 

Natural  Features 

The  Kumaon  Himalaya  or  Himalaya  West  comprises  the  central 
portion  of  the  mountainous  expanse  from  Kashmir  to  Darjeeling.  It 
constitutes  the  northernmost  part  of  the  Indian  state  of  Uttar  Pradesh 
and  is  bordered  on  the  east  by  Nepal,  on  the  north  by  Tibet  and  on 
the  west  by  the  state  of  Himachal  Pradesh.1  It  rises  abruptly  from  the 


10 


THE    SETTING 


Gangetic  plain  at  scarcely  1,000  feet  above  sea  level  to  the  perpetual 
snows  of  the  passes  into  Tibet  at  16,000  to  18,000  feet  and  the  peaks  of 
Bandarpunch,  Trisul,  Nanda  Devi,  and  others  reaching  20,000  to 
25,000  feet.  The  main  axis  of  the  high  or  snowy  Himalayan  range  is 
an  arc  from  Kashmir  in  the  northwest,  through  and  beyond  Nepal  in 
the  east.  The  region  of  interest  here  comprises  the  lower  and  outer 
ranges  known  as  the  Sub-Himalayas,  and  specifically  those  portions  of 
the  Kumaon  Himalaya  lying  predominately  below  10,000  feet  and  often 
called  the  Kumaon  hills. 

Topographically  the  Kumaon  hill  area  is  one  of  mountains  and 
rivers.  Since  the  mountains  are  geologically  young  they  are  precipitous 
and  rocky.  The  valleys  are  steep  and  narrow,  the  streams  and  rivers  are 
swift,  and  in  the  rainy  season  they  become  rushing  torrents.  The 
mountainous  area  is  separated  from  the  plains  to  the  south  by  barren, 
rocky  talus  slopes  below  which  is  a  strip  of  forest  and  marshland. 

Along  part  of  their  length  the  Himalayas  are  paralleled  a  few  miles 
to  the  south  by  remnants  of  the  ancient  Siwalik  range.  Between  these 
ranges  lie  narrow  valleys  such  as  that  of  Dehra  Dun,  bordering  the 
Himalayan  foothills  for  45  miles  and  separated  from  the  Gangetic 
plain  by  the  low  but  rugged  Siwalik  hills.  Here,  as  in  popular  usage  in 
the  area,  "the  valley"  will  be  used  to  refer  to  the  Dehra  Dun  valley, 
some  of  the  eastern  portion  of  which  is  visible  from  Sirkanda.  The 
valley  is  about  2,000  feet  above  sea  level,  while  the  Gangetic  plain 
beyond  the  Siwaliks  is  not  over  1,000  feet  in  elevation.  It  is  the  latter 
plain  that  is  here  termed  "the  plains,"  in  accordance  with  local  usage. 

Throughout  the  Himalayas,  population  density  is  restricted  by  the 
terrain.  Prime  requisites  for  occupation  by  the  agriculturists  who 
inhabit  these  mountains  are  topsoil  that  can  be  terraced  and  a  steady 
water  supply.  Alluvial  fans,  gradual  slopes,  or  broad  valleys  are  ex- 
ceptionally favorable  spots  for  habitation.  Most  of  the  population  is 
found  in  valleys  and  on  the  lower  slopes  of  the  mountains  below  an 
elevation  of  6,000  feet. 

The  Kumaon  Himalaya  lies  across  300  north  latitude  and  is  there- 
fore within  the  Temperate  Zone  not  far  from  the  tropics.  Climate  is 
influenced  by  the  high  Himalayas  to  the  north  and  the  Gangetic  plain 
to  the  south.  Three  seasons  are  recognized  and  terminologically  dis- 
tinguished by  the  inhabitants:  winter,  hot  season  or  summer,  and  rainy 
season.  Winter  lasts  from  mid-October  to  mid-February  and  is  char- 
acterized by  clear,  cool  weather,  followed  by  colder  weather  and  some 
precipitation  in  December,  January,  and  February.  Temperature  varies 
with  altitude,  so  that  even  during  the  coldest  period  little  snow  falls 


THE   SETTING  11 

below  the  6,000-foot  level  while  considerable  falls  above  that  level.  In 
Sirkanda  for  about  a  month  in  winter,  temperatures  often  fall  slightly 
below  freezing  at  night,  but  they  usually  rise  considerably  during  the 
day.  Summer  begins  in  mid-February  and  extends  through  the  middle 
of  June.  In  March  and  April  localized  storms  occur.  By  mid-April  the 
hot,  dry  season  is  at  hand  and  lasts  until  the  monsoon  breaks  in  the 
latter  half  of  June.  Rains  continue  to  come  frequently  and  heavily  and 
temperatures  remain  fairly  high  until  mid-September,  when  tempera- 
tures begin  to  drop  and  rains  cease.  Annual  rainfall  varies  greatly, 
with  the  outer  range  of  mountains  catching  the  heaviest  precipitation 
as  the  clouds  move  in  from  the  plains.  Annual  rainfall  in  Mussoorie 
averages  around  80  inches,  while  other  hill  locations  report  rainfall  of 
40  to  100  inches  per  year.  Vegetation  is  profoundly  influenced  by  al- 
titude and  rainfall. 

Generally  the  slopes  which  face  northward  are  more  thickly  wooded  than 
the  southward  slopes,  as  in  the  former  the  sun's  rays  only  slant  across  the 
surface,  and  the  moisture  is  retained  in  the  soil  for  a  longer  period.  With  the 
decrease  in  elevation  a  gradual  change  in  the  composition  of  the  forest 
is  observed.  .  .  .  The  slopes  above  the  Kali  .  .  .  present  an  excellent  epitome 
of  this  plant  variation.  One  passes  from  the  shisham  (Dalbergia  sissoo)  and 
sal  (Shorea  robusta)  in  the  river  beds,  through  oak  and  rhododendron  on  the 
high  hills,  to  firs,  birch,  and  box  on  the  still  higher  central  ridges.  (Pant, 
1935.  P-  37) 

The  fauna  is  varied  and  includes  deer,  goats,  pigs,  monkeys,  foxes, 
jackals,  porcupines,  bears,  leopards,  and  an  occasional  tiger.  A  wide 
variety  of  birds  is  to  be  found,  including  native  wild  chickens.  The 
streams  abound  in  Indian  trout.  The  wild  life  and  terrain  of  the  Ku- 
maon  hills  have  been  vividly  depicted  in  the  well-known  works  of  Jim 
Corbett  (1946),  while  the  fauna  has  been  described  in  detail  by  Atkinson 
(1884a,  pp.  1-266). 

Administrative  History 

The  western  half  of  the  Kumaon  Himalaya  is  known  as  Garhwal 
— the  country  of  fortresses — after  the  large  stone  structures  found 
scattered  through  the  region.  It  comprises  the  present  districts  of 
Garhwal,  Tehri  Garhwal,  and  the  Himalayan  hill  area  of  Dehra  Dun 
District  exclusive  of  Jaunsar-Bawar  (see  map  1).  Almora  and  Naini 
Tal  districts  to  the  east  are  often  called  the  "Kumaon  districts"  when 
contrasted  to  Garhwal.  In  the  Hindu  scriptures  Garhwal  is  referred  to 
as  Kedarkhand.  Kedarkhand  is  important  in  Hindu  religion  and  my- 


12  THE    SETTING 

thology  as  the  place  of  origin  of  the  two  sacred  rivers  Ganges  and  Jumna 
and  as  the  site  of  famous  places  of  pilgrimage  including  Hardwar, 
Rishikesh,  Kedarnath,  Badrinath,  Jamnotri,  and  Gangotri. 

Rishis  [sages]  and  ascetics  in  large  numbers  resorted  to  its  silent  valleys 
for  purposes  of  meditation  or  the  instruction  of  their  disciples.  The  final 
scene  of  the  life  of  the  five  heroes  of  the  Mahabharata  was  enacted  amid  its 
mountains  and  many  place-names  in  the  Alaknanda  valley  still  recall  the 
memory  of  BhimSen  and  his  brothers.  Garhwal  may  still  claim  to  be  the 
holy  land  of  India:  its  valleys  are  full  of  ancient  temples  and  there  is  scarcely 
a  ridge  from  which  the  wonderful  spectacle  of  the  snowy  range  is  visible 
without  its  humble  shrine.  Every  year  thousands  of  pilgrims  from  all  parts 
of  India  make  their  laborious  way  on  foot  along  the  via  sacra  of  Badrinath. 
(Bahadur,  1916,  p.  ii) 

Little  is  known  of  the  early  history  of  Garhwal  and  the  surrounding 
areas  either  through  written  sources  or  local  tradition. 

Up  to  the  time  of  Ajaiya  Pala  [about  a.d.  1358]  Garhwal  was  divided 
amongst  a  number  of  petty  Rajas.  Every  glen  or  hill,  as  formerly  was  the 
case  in  the  highlands  of  Scotland,  was  subject  to  its  own  chiefs  who  have 
left  no  record  behind  except  the  moss-covered  walls  of  their  strongholds. 
And  although  Ajaiya  Pala  is  credited  with  having  reduced  fifty-two  of  these 
petty  chiefs  under  his  own  rule,  we  may  well  suppose  that  he  was  only  the 
first  of  his  line  to  aim  at  more  than  a  local  supremacy,  and  that  to  his  suc- 
cessors is  due  the  extension  of  the  Garhwal  power  over  the  Dun,  Bisahir, 
and  the  tract  now  known  as  Tihri  or  foreign  Garhwal.  (Atkinson,  1884a,  pp. 
526-527) 

For  the  end  of  the  sixteenth  century  and  later,  more  precise  records 
and  dates  are  available.  Then  Garhwal  appeared  as  an  independent 
kingdom  at  its  greatest  recorded  extent.  It  remained  thus  until  1803- 
1805,  when  the  Garhwal  Raja,  Pradhuman  Shah,  was  defeated  and 
killed  in  battle  by  invading  Nepalese  armies  which  pushed  westward, 
extending  Nepalese  suzerainty  to  the  Sutlej  River.  Although  the  Nepa- 
lese acquired  a  reputation  for  harsh,  exploitative  rule  which  reportedly 
led  to  mass  emigration  out  of  the  hills,  their  eleven-year  rule  left  few 
imprints  in  relatively  inaccessible  localities  such  as  Sirkanda. 

The  British  defeated  the  Nepalese  in  1815  and,  in  taking  control 
from  them,  divided  Garhwal  into  its  present  parts.  The  eastern  half, 
comprising  5,629  square  miles,  was  placed  under  direct  British  rule 
and  was  thenceforth  known  as  British  Garhwal  or  simply  Garhwal. 
For  administrative  purposes  it  was  included  with  the  districts  of  Naini 
Tal  and  Almora,  to  its  east,  to  form  the  Kumaon  Division.  The  Dehra 
Dun  valley  and  adjacent  hills  in  the  southwestern  corner  of  Garhwal 
and  the  hill  tract  called  Jaunsar-Bawar  west  of  Garhwal  were  annexed 


CENTRAL    PAHARI   DISTRICTS 
(HIMALAYA   WEST) 

1.  Dehro   Dun  District 

2  Tehri   Garhwal  District 

3  Garhwal  District 

4  Almora  District 

5  Naini   Tal   District 


LOCAL    AREAS 

o         io       20  miles 


Cultural-linguistic 

boundary 
Administrative  boundary 


Map  1.  Linguistic  and  administrative  environs  of  Sirkanda.  Partly  adapted 
from  Grierson  (1916),  pp.  101,  373. 


14  THE    SETTING 

to  Saharanpur  District,  which  was  already  under  direct  British  rule. 
Later  the  annexed  sections  became  Dehra  Dun  District.  The  remaining 
large  portion  of  Garhwal,  comprising  4,200  square  miles  between 
British  Garhwal  and  Dehra  Dun  District,  was  ceded  to  Sudershan  Shah, 
the  son  of  the  last  of  the  Garhwal  Rajas  (who  had  died  in  the  Nepalese 
war).  This  section,  called  Tehri  Garhwal,  remained  an  independent 
princely  state  under  succeeding  rajas  until  Indian  Independence  (1947), 
when,  after  some  delay,  it  was  incorporated  into  Uttar  Pradesh.  Since 
Independence  these  areas  have  remained  administratively  separated 
as  districts  in  Uttar  Pradesh  but  are,  of  course,  under  a  common  law. 
Throughout  the  period  of  recorded  history,  the  inhabitants  of  Garhwal 
have  retained  their  social  and  cultural  ties  despite  administrative 
division  of  the  area. 

The  People  and  Their  History 

The  people  of  the  Sub-Himalayan  hills  from  western  Kashmir  to 
eastern  Nepal  are  referred  to  by  the  generic  term  Pahari  (of  the  moun- 
tains). While  not  a  particularly  precise  term,  it  is  a  useful  one  and  is 
recognized  throughout  North  India.  Two  major  ancestral  stocks  are 
generally  believed  to  have  contributed  to  the  present  Pahari  popula- 
tion. One,  often  assumed  to  have  been  an  early,  indigenous  group, 
now  appears  as  the  Dom  or  low  castes.  The  other,  described  as  an 
Indo-Aryan  speaking  group,  is  presumably  more  recent  and  of  Central 
Asian  origin.  Its  descendants,  called  Khasa  or  Khasiya,  comprise  the 
present  high  castes  of  the  hills.  The  term  "Khasiya"  is  used  by  the 
people  in  the  region  of  this  study,  while  "Khasa"  is  more  frequent  in 
the  literature  about  Paharis.  Throughout  this  account,  the  Bhotlya, 
a  Mongoloid,  Tibeto-Burmese  speaking,  and  culturally  distinct  people 
of  the  higher  Himalayas  are  excluded  from  the  discussion  except  where 
specific  reference  is  made  to  them. 

Both  Khasas  and  Doms  are  often  described  as  internally  relatively 
undifferentiated.  Khasas  are  divided  into  Brahmin  and  Rajput  groups, 
but  interaction  is  more  intimate  between  them  than  is  usual  on  the 
plains.  Even  intermarriage  is  tolerated.  Doms  are  divided  into  several 
endogamous  groups  ranked  relative  to  one  another  and  associated 
with  occupational  specialties.  However,  occupational  specialization  is 
remarkably  variable,  and  many  accounts  describe  them  as  formerly 
less  differentiated.  One  might  speculate  that  at  one  time  there  were 
two  relatively  homogeneous  groups,  the  dominant,  agricultural  Khasas 
and  the  dependent,  depressed  artisan  or  service  group  known  as  Doms. 
These  were  probably  groups    of  different  ethnic  affinities,  but  they 


THE    SETTING  15 

could  have  been  status  groups  originating  from  a  common  source. 
Internal  differentiation  within  each  may  have  resulted  from  subse- 
quent contacts  with  plains  peoples — perhaps  immigrants  to  the  hills. 
As  a  result  of  such  contacts  Khasas  took  the  names  and  other  status 
characteristics  of  Brahmins  and  Rajputs,  or  in  some  areas  they  may 
all  have  become  "Rajputs"  while  the  immigrants  from  the  plains  were 
Brahmins.  Meanwhile  Doms  may  have  subdivided  according  to  oc- 
cupational specialty  as  a  result  of  high-caste  expectations  or  their  own 
adoption  of  plains  attitudes,  or  as  a  result  of  an  influx  of  artisans  from 
the  plains.  Around  Sirkanda  it  seems  not  improbable  that  the  caste 
of  drummer-tailor-basketmakers  (Bajgi)  may  be  descended  from  the 
archetypical  "Doms"  while  the  other  specialties  (such  as  blacksmiths) 
were  derived  from  immigrant  groups  or  possibly  from  specialization 
within  the  old  Dom  group  (such  as  weavers).  This,  like  the  widespread 
assertion  that  Doms  preceded  Khasas,  is  speculation  and  should  be 
interpreted  as  nothing  more.  With  present  evidence  no  better  can  be 
done.  We  can  safely  say  only  that  the  origins  and  affinities  of  con- 
temporary Pahari  castes  and  occupational  groups  are  largely  unknown, 
and  that  this  fact  has  stimulated  conjecture.  Such  conjecture  has 
centered  most  heavily  on  the  Khasas,  who  are  dominant  in  numbers, 
wealth,  and  status  and  about  whom  some  historical  information  is  at 
hand. 

Khasas 

"Sanskrit  literature  contains  frequent  references  to  a  tribe  whose 
name  is  usually  spelt  Khasa,  with  variants  such  as  Khasa,  Khasha,  and 
Khasira.  The  earlier  we  trace  notices  regarding  them,  the  further 
northwest  we  find  them"  (Grierson,  1916,  p.  2).  They  appear  frequently 
in  the  Puranas  (ancient  Hindu  literature),  and  they  figure  prominently 
in  the  Mahabharata. 

We  gather  that  according  to  the  most  ancient  Indian  authorities  in  the 
extreme  north-west  of  India,  on  the  Hindu  Kush  and  the  mountainous 
tracts  to  the  south,  and  in  the  Western  Panjab  there  was  a  group  of  tribes 
one  of  which  was  called  Khasa,  which  were  looked  upon  as  Kshatriyas  of 
Aryan  origin.  These  spoke  a  language  closely  allied  to  Sanskrit.  .  .  .  They 
were  considered  to  have  lost  their  claim  to  consideration  as  Aryans,  and  to 
have  become  Mlechchhas,  or  barbarians,  owing  to  their  non-observance  of 
the  rules  for  eating  and  drinking  observed  by  the  Sanskritic  peoples  of  India. 
These  Khasas  were  a  warlike  tribe,  and  were  well  known  to  classical  writers, 
who  noted,  as  their  special  home,  the  Indian  Caucasus  of  Pliny.  .  .  . 

It  is  probable  that  they  once  occupied  an  important  position  in  Central 
Asia,  and  the  Kashgar  of  Chitral  were  named  after  them.  They  were  closely 


l6  THE    SETTING 

connected  with  the  group  of  tribes  nicknamed  "PiSachas"  or  "cannibals"  by 
Indian  writers,  and  before  the  sixth  century  they  were  stated  to  speak  the 
same  language  as  the  people  of  Balkh.  At  the  same  period  they  had  ap- 
parently penetrated  along  the  southern  slope  of  the  Himalaya  as  far  east 
as  Nepal,  and  in  the  twelfth  century  they  certainly  occupied  in  considerable 
force  the  hills  to  the  south,  south-west  and  south-east  of  Kashmir. 

At  the  present  day  their  descendants,  and  the  tribes  who  claim  descent 
from  them,  occupy  a  much  wider  area.  (Grierson,  1916,  pp.  7-8) 

The  languages  of  the  hill  regions,  like  the  peoples,  are  termed  Pahari. 

The  word  "Pahari"  means  "of  or  belonging  to  the  mountains,"  and  is 
specially  applied  to  the  groups  of  languages  spoken  in  the  sub-Himalayan 
hills  extending  from  Bhadrawah,  north  of  the  Pan  jab,  to  the  eastern  parts 
of  Nepal.  To  its  North  and  East  various  Himalayan  Tibeto-Burman  languages 
are  spoken.  To  its  west  there  are  Aryan  languages  connected  with  Kashmiri 
and  Western  Panjabi,  and  to  its  south  it  has  the  Aryan  languages  of  the 
Panjab  and  the  Gangetic  plain,  viz.: — in  order  from  West  to  East,  Panjabi, 
Western  Hindi,  Eastern  Hindi  and  Bihari. 

The  Pahari  languages  fall  into  three  main  groups.  In  the  extreme  East 
there  is  Khas-Kura  or  Eastern  Pahari,  commonly  called  Naipali,  the  Aryan 
language  spoken  in  Nepal.  Next,  in  Kumaon  and  Garhwal,  we  have  the 
Central  Pahari  language,  Kumauni  and  Garhwali.  Finally  in  the  West  we 
have  the  Western  Pahari  languages  spoken  in  Jaunsar-Bawar,  the  Simla 
Hill  States,  Kulu,  Mandi  and  Suket,  Chamba,  and  Western  Kashmir.  (Grier- 
son, 1916,  p.  1) 

"It  is  a  remarkable  fact  that,  although  Pahari  has  little  connexion 
with  the  Panjabi,  Western  and  Eastern  Hindi,  and  Bihari  spoken  im- 
mediately to  its  south,  it  shows  manifold  traces  of  intimate  relation- 
ship with  the  languages  of  Rajputana"  (Grierson,  1916,  p.  2).  There 
is  general  agreement  that  the  relationship  between  the  Pahari  and 
Rajasthani  languages  is  attributable  to  the  movement  of  peoples, 
notably  the  Gurjaras,  between  these  two  areas. 

The  earliest  immigrants  [into  the  Pahari  tract]  of  whom  we  have  any 
historical  information  were  the  Khasas,  .  .  .  They  were  followed  by  the 
Gurjaras,  a  tribe  who  invaded  India  about  the  sixth  century  a.d.  and  oc- 
cupied the  same  tract,  then  known  as  Sapadalaksha.  At  that  time,  they 
[like  the  Khasas]  spoke  an  Aryan,  but  not  necessarily  Indo-Aryan  language. 
Of  these  Gurjaras  the  bulk  followed  pastoral  pursuits  and  became  merged  in 
and  identified  with  the  preceding  Khasa  population.  Others  were  fighting 
men,  and  were  identified  by  the  Brahmans  [priestly  class]  with  Kshatriyas 
[warrior  class].  In  this  guise  they  invaded  Eastern  Rajputana  from  Sapadalak- 
sha and,  possibly,  Western  Rajputana  from  Sindh,  and  founded,  as  Rajputs, 
the  great  Rajput  states  of  Rajputana.  (Grierson,  1916,  p.  14) 


THE   SETTING  17 

Vincent  Smith,  quoted  by  Grierson,  differs  in  his  explanation  of  the 
sequence  in  this  relationship,  but  not  in  the  fact  of  the  relationship: 

The  Gujars,  etc.,  of  the  lower  Himalayas  who  now  speak  forms  of  Rajasthani 
are  in  large  measure  of  the  same  stock  as  many  Rajput  clans  in  Rajputana, 
the  Panjab  and  the  United  Provinces;  .  .  .  their  ancestors  emigrated  from 
Rajputana  after  they  had  acquired  the  Rajasthani  speech;  and  .  .  .  the  most 
likely  time  for  such  emigration  is  the  ninth  century,  when  the  Gurjara- 
Rajput  power  dominated  all  northern  and  northwestern  India  .  .  .  (Grier- 
son, 1916,  p.  12;  emphasis  added) 

In  either  case  ".  .  .  it  is  plain  that  down  even  to  the  days  of  late 
Musalman  dominion  the  tie  between  Sapadalaksha  [the  Western 
Pahari-speaking  areas]  and  Rajputana  was  never  broken.  And  this,  in 
my  opinion,  satisfactorily  explains  the  fact  of  the  close  connexion  be- 
tween the  Pahari  languages  and  Rajasthani"  (Grierson,  1916,  p.  13). 

The  Khasas  were  apparently  among  those  participating  in  the  large 
movements  of  Aryan-speaking  peoples  into  India.  Therefore  it  is 
probable  that  they  entered  between  1500  and  1000  b.c.  from  the  north- 
west. There  is  not  universal  agreement  among  scholars  that  this  was 
the  route  followed  or  even  that  there  was  large-scale  immigration  then. 
F.  E.  Pargiter  concludes  from  his  research  that  "tradition  or  myth  in- 
dicates that  the  Ailas  (or  Aryans)  entered  India  from  the  mid- 
Himalayan  region,  and  its  attitude  towards  the  N.  W.  frontier  lends 
no  support  to  any  invasion  from  that  quarter"  (Pargiter,  1922,  p.  299). 
Thus  he  believes  that  entry  was  from  Tibet  through  Garhwal  into 
India.  Probably  archaeology  can  best  resolve  this  question. 

It  is  evident  that  the  Khasas  have  been  in  the  Sub-Himalayan  hills 
for  a  very  long  time.  It  is  also  true  that  there  has  been  a  continuing 
immigration  of  people  from  the  plains  who  have  become  absorbed 
into  the  hill  population.  Grierson  notes  that  the  Gujars  not  only 
emigrated  from  the  hills  to  the  plains,  but 

.  .  .  there  was  a  constant  reflux  of  emigration  on  the  part  of  the  Gujar- 
Rajputs  from  Rajputana  and  the  neighbouring  parts  of  India.  These  re- 
immigrants  became,  as  befitted  their  Kshatriya  station,  the  rulers  of  the 
country  and  today  most  of  the  chiefs  and  princes  of  die  old  Sapadalaksha 
trace  their  descent  from  Rajputs  of  the  plains.  The  re-immigration  was 
increased  by  the  oppression  of  the  Mughul  rule  in  India  proper,  and  there 
are  historical  notices  of  tribe  after  tribe,  and  leader  after  leader,  abandoning 
their  established  seats  in  Rajputana  and  seeking  refuge  from  Musalman 
oppression  in  the  hills  from  which  they  had  originally  issued  to  conquer  the 
Gangetic  valley.  (Grierson,  1916,  pp.  14  f.) 


^v 


l8  THE    SETTING 

Other  non-Pahari  people  from  the  plains  adjacent  to  the  Himalayas 
also  frequently  sought  refuge  in  the  hills  and  became  merged  with  the 
hill  population. 

Contact  has  long  existed  between  Paharis  and  Tibeto-Burmese 
speaking  peoples,  often  referred  to  as  Bhotiyas  or  Tibetans,  who  oc- 
cupy the  higher  Himalayas  bordering  the  Pahari  region  along  its 
northern  periphery.  In  border  areas  physical  and  cultural  intermin- 
gling occurs.  In  the  Western  and  Central  Pahari  regions  such  admix- 
ture has  been  minimal,  while  to  the  east,  especially  in  Nepal,  it  has 
occurred  to  a  much  greater  extent. 

The  physical  appearance  of  the  high-caste  Paharis  of  the  Central 
and  Western  hills  is  often  described  in  idealized  fashion,  as  in  these 
words  of  a  contemporary  anthropologist: 

The  Khasas  are  usually  tall,  handsome,  fair-complexioned  (rosy  or  sallow), 
possess  a  long  head,  vertical  forehead,  fine  or  leptorhine  nose,  hazel  eyes 
with  a  sprinkling  of  blue,  curly  hair  and  other  features  well-cut  and  pro- 
portioned. The  women  are  also  comparatively  tall,  slender,  graceful,  of  a 
very  attractive  appearance  and  of  extremely  gay  disposition.  (Majumdar, 
1944,  p.  110) 

The  number  of  exceptions  to  such  a  description  probably  exceeds  the 
examples,  and  the  range  in  physical  types  overlaps  greatly  with  that 
found  in  the  Gangetic  plain.  However,  there  is  perhaps  a  statistically 
significant  tendency  in  the  direction  suggested  by  Majumdar.  Some 
observers  claim  to  find  physical  differences  among  contiguous  popula- 
tions of  high-caste  Paharis.  Thus  R.  N.  Saksena's  description  of  the 
Khasas  of  Jaunsar-Bawar:  "Their  physical  features,  fair  complexion, 
tall  stature,  aquiline  nose  and  well-defined  features  of  the  face  easily 
distinguish  them  from  their  neighbours,  the  Garhwalis"  (Saksena, 
1955,  p.  9).  Such  statements  are  based  on  stereotypes  rather  than  ob- 
servation. 

The  Khasas  have  often  been  referred  to  as  a  "tribal"  people.  This 
term  has  not  been  defined  in  such  a  way  as  to  include  satisfactorily  the 
diverse  groups  it  is  often  used  to  designate  nor  to  exclude  many  of  the 
diverse  groups  it  excludes.  However,  in  India  it  usually  refers  to 
peoples  who  are  not  Hindus  or  Muslims  or  followers  of  other  major 
religions,  who  do  not  have  caste  organization,  or  who  practice  a  more 
primitive  economy  than  that  of  most  Indian  communities. 

Whatever  their  origin,  the  Khasas  of  today  cannot  be  considered  a 
tribal  people  by  any  of  these  criteria.  They  certainly  are  not  aborigines 
as  that  term  is  used  in  India  to  denote  non-Hindu  "original  sons  of 
the  soil,"  who  live  in  a  "primitive  state  of  existence." 


THE    SETTING  19 

The  great  mass  of  the  population  in  Kumaon  and  Garhwal  profess  a 
belief  little  differing  from  the  orthodox  Hinduism  of  the  plains.  .  .  .  All 
their  feelings  and  prejudices  are  so  strongly  imbued  with  the  peculiar  spirit 
of  Hinduism  that  although  their  social  habits  and  religious  belief  are  often 
repugnant  to  those  who  strictly  observe  the  orthodox  ceremonial  usages  of 
Hinduism,  it  is  impossible  for  any  one  that  knows  them  to  consider  the 
Khasas  to  be  other  than  Hindus.  There  are  several  facts  connected  with 
their  history  that  show,  whatever  their  origin  may  have  been,  the  Khasas 
have  for  centuries  been  under  the  influence  of  the  Brahmanical  priesthood. 
(Atkinson,   1884a,  p.  269) 

Their  unorthodox  practice  of  Hinduism  is  well-known  and  long- 
recognized.  Grierson  refers  to  the  Laws  of  Manu:  "Looking  at  the 
Khasas  from  the  Brahmanical  point  of  view,  he  says  (X,  22)  that  Khasas 
are  the  offspring  of  outcaste  Kshatriyas,  and  again  (X,  44)  ...  he  says 
that  [among  other  tribes,  the]  Khasas  are  those  who  became  outcaste 
through  having  neglected  their  religious  duties  .  .  ."  (Grierson,  1916, 
p.  5).  "Even  in  the  most  orthodox  writings  the  Khasas  are  looked  on 
more  as  heretical  members  of  the  great  Aryan  family  than  as  outcaste 
aborigines,  and  .  .  .  from  a  very  early  period  they  have  been  recog- 
nized as  an  important  tribe  in  Upper  India"  (Atkinson,  1884a,  p.  283). 

Today  the  Khasas  universally  define  themselves  as  Hindus  who  are 
in  some  respects  culturally  distinct  from  others  of  their  religion  and 
caste.  This  they  attribute  primarily  to  the  rigors  of  life  in  the  hills. 
They  display  no  pan-Khasa  unity  beyond  recognition  of  the  term  and 
certain  cultural  similarities.  Recently  there  has  been  some  pressure  in 
the  Western  Pahari  area  to  form  a  separate  hill  state,  but  that  is  a 
post-Independence  phenomenon  of  educated  hill  men. 

It  is  worth  noting  that  in  many  areas,  including  that  of  this  research 
and  Jaunsar-Bawar  to  the  northwest,  only  Rajputs  (Kshatriyas)  refer  to 
themselves  as  Khasiya  or  Khasa.  Brahmins,  though  apparently  of  the 
same  stock,  do  not  there  admit  to  the  designation.  In  fact  the  term 
Khasa  refers  historically  to  a  Kshatriya  group.  However,  Majumdar 
(1944,  p.  110)  notes  that  "the  Khasas  or  the  Khasiyas  who  constitute 
the  high  caste  people  of  the  cis-Himalayan  region  are  either  Rajput 
or  Brahmin.  .  .  ."  "Khasiya  Brahmans"  are  referred  to  by  Atkinson 
(1886,  p.  430),  who  states  that,  "Nearly  ninety  per  cent  of  the  Brahmans 
in  Kumaon  belong  to  the  Khasiya  race  and  are  so  classed  by  the  people 
themselves.  .  .  ."  "Khas-Brahmins"  are  found  throughout  the  Pahari 
regions  both  as  landowning  and  tilling  agriculturists,  like  the  Rajputs, 
and  as  priests.  Atkinson  (1884a,  p.  734)  remarks  that  these  Brahmins 
really  have  no  title  to  the  name  Brahmin,  evidently  reserving  legitimate 
application  of  the  term  to  Brahmins  of  plains  origin.  In  any  event, 


'Y 


20  THE    SETTING 

Pahari  Brahmins  are  indistinguishable  from  Rajputs  in  most  respects. 
Even  caste  distinctions  between  the  two  are  not  as  rigid  as  in  most  of 
India.  It  is  likely  that  the  division  into  Rajput  and  Brahmin  castes 
occurred  after  the  Khasas  moved  into  India  and  not  before  the  earliest 
references  to  them.  Brahmin  disavowal  of  the  Khasa  appellation  may 
well  relate  to  its  association  with  defiled,  or  at  least  very  unorthodox, 
Hindus. 

Some  Rajput  Paharis  deny  that  they  are  Khasas  on  grounds  that 
they  are  of  plains  origin.  They  say  the  term  refers  to  degraded  people 
who  are  not  really  Rajputs,  and  they  claim  higher  status  for  them- 
selves. No  such  people  reside  in  or  around  Sirkanda,  and  it  is  impos- 
sible to  assess  the  accuracy  of  their  claims  to  plains  origin.  Probably 
some  are  of  more  recent  plains  ancestry  than  avowed  Khasas,  but 
others  may  well  have  adopted  this  claim  as  a  means  to  status  enhance- 
ment. 

Doms 

The  second  large  population  group  of  the  Sub-Himalayan  region 
is  that  of  the  alleged  predecessors  of  the  Khasa,  commonly  called  Dom. 
Little  or  nothing  is  known  of  the  history  of  these  people.  They  are 
often  described  as  having  occupied  the  region  at  the  time  the  Aryan 
invasions  occurred,  and  having  then  been  pushed  back,  subjugated, 
and  assigned  to  their  rigidly  inferior  social  status  by  the  conquering 
Aryans.  For  this  reason  they  are  sometimes  included  in  accounts  of 
aborigines.  Majumdar  (1944,  p.  110)  has  suggested  that  the  Aryans  may 
have  brought  the  Doms  with  them  when  they  entered  India.  Whether 
they  are  related  in  any  way  other  than  by  name  to  Doms  of  the  plains 
is  unknown. 

Doms  are  the  low-caste  groups  of  the  Himalayan  area. 

In  the  hills  and  in  the  Dun  they  comprise  all  classes  who  do  menial  and 
more  or  less  degrading  duties  such  as  are  performed  by  separate  occupational 
castes  in  the  plains.  They  are  a  depressed  race,  seldom  cultivate  and  practi- 
cally never  own  land.  (Walton,  1911a,  p.  97) 

"They  have  for  ages  been  the  slaves  of  the  Khasiyas  and  been  thought 
less  of  than  the  cattle  .  .  ."  (Atkinson,  1884a,  p.  370).  They  are  the 
"serfs  of  the  Khasiya  race  in  Kumaon,  Garhwal  and  along  the  hills  to 
the  westward  as  far  as  the  Indus  valley"  (Atkinson,  1886,  p.  443).  They 
constitute  the  artisan  class  and  in  fact  are  also  collectively  referred  to 
as  Shilpkdr  (artisan).  They  are  untouchable  (achut)  whether  they  be 
blacksmith,  carpenter,  musician,  shoemaker,  weaver,  tailor,  basket- 
maker,  or  whatever.  Fifteen  to  thirty  castes  of  Doms  are  found  in 


THE    SETTING  21 

various  parts  of  the  Kumaon  hills  (Atkinson,  1886,  pp.  444  f.;  Bahadur, 
1916,  pp.  101  f.;  Raturi,  1928,  pp.  196  ff.).  Some  of  these  may  be  wholly 
or  partly  derived  from  equivalent  castes  of  the  plains  who  have  emi- 
grated to  the  hills,  while  others  are  old  indigenous  groups  or  groups 
derived  from  internal  differentiation  of  the  Doms. 

Doms  have  had  no  distinct  language  in  history  or  tradition,  and  their 
religious  and  social  beliefs  and  practices  appear  to  be  continuous  with 
those  of  the  higher  castes.  Whatever  their  cultural  heritage  may  have 
been,  it  is  now  merged  with  that  of  the  Khasiyas  so  that  traces  of  their 
separate  origin,  if  any,  can  no  longer  be  identified.  Many  writers  at- 
tribute the  unorthodox  religious  and  social  practices  of  high-caste 
Paharis  to  their  contact  with  Doms,  but  there  is  no  evidence  to  support 
this  explanation.  At  least  one  writer  attributes  the  origin  of  the  wor- 
ship of  Shiva,  one  of  the  great  gods  of  modern  Hinduism,  to  the 
aboriginal  low-caste  Paharis  (Bahadur,  1916,  pp.  73,  122). 

Aside  from  occupational  and  status  differences,  the  most  widely  re- 
marked distinctive  feature  of  Doms  is  their  physical  appearance.  The 
stereotypes  regarding  Doms  are  essentially  those  regarding  low  castes 
and  "aborigines"  or  "Dravidians"  elsewhere  in  India.  Majumdar  (1944, 
p.  xvi)  refers  to  them  as  "...  a  dark-skinned,  short-statured,  flat-nosed 
people  who  'scourge  the  eastern  districts  of  the  province.'  "  Atkinson 
(1884a,  p.  370)  notes  their  "exceedingly  dark  complexion."  In  the 
Central  and  Western  Pahari  regions  with  which  the  writer  is  familiar, 
these  are  physical  stereotypes  based  on  a  grain  of  truth,  but  little  more. 
It  is  impossible  for  Paharis  or  others  to  distinguish  Doms  from  high- 
caste  people  accurately  and  consistently  on  the  basis  of  physiognomy 
alone.  Majumdar  is  the  only  physical  anthropologist  to  have  worked 
among  Paharis.  The  results  of  his  measurements  show  minor  physical 
differences  between  Khasas  and  Doms  (Majumdar,  1944,  pp.  181  ff.). 
Genetic  admixture  between  the  groups  has  largely  eliminated  the 
physical  differences  that  may  once  have  existed. 

Census  materials  indicate  that  high-caste  people  outnumber  Doms 
ten  to  one  in  Tehri  Garhwal  District.  This  is  almost  exactly  the  ratio 
in  Jaunsar-Bawar  to  the  west  and  in  thirty  villages  related  to  Sirkanda 
by  marriage  ties,  although  particular  villages  sometimes  show  wide 
deviation  from  this  average. 

Language 

The  people  of  Sirkanda  speak  the  language  termed  "Central 
Pahari"  by  Grierson,  a  language  which  includes  the  local  dialects  of 
the  lower  Himalayas  between  the  Nepalese  border  and  the  Punjab, 


22  THE    SETTING 

except  for  Jaunsar-Bawar,  where  Western  Pahari  is  spoken.  Very  likely 
field  studies  would  demonstrate  extension  of  this  language  well  into 
western  Nepal,  without  sharp  demarcation  between  it  and  Eastern 
Pahari.  Grierson  recognizes  two  component  languages,  Kumauni  and 
Garhwali,  and  he  refers  to  several  subdialects  of  Garhwali  including 
"Gangapariya"  (language  of  the  country  beyond  the  Ganges)  or  Tehri 
Garhwali,  which,  with  some  variations,  is  evidently  that  spoken  in 
Sirkanda  and  surrounding  villages.  Estimating  the  total  number  of 
speakers  of  these  languages  is  difficult  because  of  the  nature  of  records 
available  and  because  of  the  lack  of  accurate  definition  of  the  linguistic 
designations.  Grierson  gave  the  Pahari-speaking  population  of  India, 
excluding  the  large  but  undetermined  number  of  speakers  of  Eastern 
Pahari  in  Nepal,  as  2,067,514  in  1891.  Of  these  over  half,  1,107,612, 
were  recorded  as  speaking  Central  Pahari,  and  over  half  of  the  Central 
Pahari  speakers,  670,824,  were  recorded  as  speaking  Garhwali.  The 
1931  census  is  the  most  recent  one  for  which  reasonably  complete  fig- 
ures on  Pahari  speakers  are  available.  At  that  time  slightly  over 
4,200,000  Pahari  speakers  were  reported  in  India,  distributed  in  sig- 
nificant numbers  from  Muzaffarabad  District  in  Kashmir  (164,000)  on 
the  west  to  the  Nepal  border  on  the  east,  with  some  Nepali  or  Eastern 
Pahari  speakers  in  Darjeeling.  A  total  of  1,725,000,  all  in  the  Kumaon 
hills  of  Uttar  Pradesh,  spoke  Central  Pahari.  Whether  or  not  this  fig- 
ure included  some  300,000  in  Tehri  Garhwal  is  unclear. 

The  1951  census  of  India  shows  just  over  4,500,000  residents  of  the 
"Western  Himalayan  Sub-Region"  exclusive  of  Jammu  and  Kashmir. 
This  area  plus  Jammu  and  Kashmir,  which  contains  well  over  600,000 
Pahari  speakers,  corresponds  approximately  to  the  Pahari-speaking  area 
of  India,  though  it  would  include  a  few  Tibeto-Burmese  speakers  and 
the  non-Pahari  residents  of  several  hill  stations.  We  may  estimate, 
therefore,  that  there  are  now  around  5,000,000  Pahari  speakers  in  India, 
over  one-third  of  whom  would  be  classed  with  Sirkanda  residents  as 
Central  Pahari  speakers  by  Grierson  and  about  1,000,000  of  whom  he 
would  classify  as  Garhwali  speakers  (cf.  volumes  of  Census  of  India 
listed  in  the  Selective  Bibliography).  There  is  no  information  upon 
which  to  base  an  estimate  of  Pahari  speakers  in  Nepal. 

Grierson  estimated  speakers  of  Tehri  Garhwali  at  240,281.  In  the 
1951  census,  408,000  speakers  of  Garhwali,  presumably  Tehri  Garhwali, 
were  reported  out  of  a  total  population  of  412,000  in  Tehri  Garhwal. 
However,  the  administrative  boundary  probably  does  not  correspond 
to  a  significant  linguistic  boundary  on  its  eastern  border. 

Since  culture  and  language  are  to  a  large  extent  correlated  in  these 


THE    SETTING  23 

hill  regions,  an  idea  of  the  population  of  the  culture  area  represented 
by  the  subjects  of  this  study  can  be  derived  from  the  above  figures. 
From  this  can  be  inferred  something  of  the  representativeness  of  what 
will  follow. 

Our  discussion  turns  now  from  the  culture  area  of  which  this  study 
is  broadly  representative  to  the  specific  location  of  the  research. 

Sirkanda  Village 

Northeast  of  Dehra  Dun  lies  a  hill  area  roughly  triangular  in 
shape  and  seven  miles  on  each  side,  known  as  BhatbaiR  (sheep  den) 
in  recognition  of  its  use  by  Bhotiyas  of  the  higher  Himalayas  as  a 
winter  pasture  for  their  sheep  (see  map  2).  This  region  comprises  pri- 
marily a  single  spur  of  mountains  projecting  southwest  from  the  first 
ridge  of  the  Himalayas.  It  lies  within  Dehra  Dun  District  but  is 
bordered  on  the  north  and  east  by  Tehri  Garhwal  District,  the  crest 
of  the  Mussoorie  Hills  forming  the  northern  boundary  and  the  Bandal 
River  forming  the  eastern.  To  the  south  and  west  it  is  bordered  by  the 
Dehra  Dun  valley  and  the  Baldi  River.  Bhatbair  has  a  total  population 
of  around  1,700  people  living  in  about  10  villages  and  at  least  15 
smaller  settlements.  These  have  been  combined,  for  administrative 
convenience,  into  seven  revenue  villages  including  Sirkanda.  This  is 
now  the  official  definition  of  "Bhatbair." 

In  local  usage  the  term  "Bhatbair"  has  not  been  very  precise.  It  is 
sometimes  used  by  Sirkanda  villagers  to  refer  to  the  immediate  Pahari 
area  familiar  to  them  and  almost  entirely  within  a  four-mile  radius  of 
Sirkanda,  including  the  side  of  the  ridge  facing  them  to  the  east,  in 
Tehri  Garhwal.  This  larger  region  forms  a  relatively  independent 
economic  and  social  unit  of  about  60  villages  and  settlements  with  a 
total  population  of  almost  5,000.  In  another  publication  (Berreman, 
1960b)  I  have  referred  to  this  larger  area  as  "Bhatbair"  for  convenience. 
In  the  present  account  I  will  use  the  term  in  its  more  restricted  sense, 
closely  approximating  the  official  definition.  The  larger  area  can 
simply  be  designated  Bhatbair  and  vicinity. 

Probably  the  earliest  historical  reference  to  Bhatbair  is  that  by 
Williams  (1874,  pp.  92  ff.),  who  refers  to  a  "Rajpoot  Princess  Ranee 
Kurnavutee"  who  had  a  palace  near  the  present  site  of  Dehra  Dun 
before  the  arrival  of  the  town's  founder  Guru  Ram  Rae  (that  is,  before 
1700).  "Under  her  fostering  care  the  valley  smiled,  and  many  flourishing 
villages  sprang  up  such  as  .  .  .  [among  others]  Bhat  Beer.  .  .  ."  Al- 
though he  has  confused  the  name  of  a  local  region  and  administrative 


1  to  4  marriage  partners 
5  to   8 
9  or  more 
more  Sirkanda  Chans 

Sirkanda  village  and  lands 


valley 


Bhatbair 


Notes: 
Circle  around  Sirkanda  indicates  area  in 
which  80%  of  Sirkanda  marriages  have 
been  contracted 

General  areas  and  more  distant  locations 
where  marriages  have  been  contracted; 
precise  village  unidentified  or  unidentifiable: 

Jaunpur 7  Sirmor(dist.  to  west).  .1 

Saklana 6  Punjab(state  to  west).. .2 

Tehri  Garhwal 12  Delhi 1 


Map  2.  Sirkanda  marriage  network  and  chans. 


-iwro  gV 


£     5?  i> 

£      I    CD 

o    .*    E 


QJ 

be 

a 

0> 

~-\ 

'Z. 

> 

o 

a 

s 

o 
o 

□ 

en 

c 

T3 

a> 

CS 

a 

■- 

o 

(/> 

xz 

C 

o 

a> 

c 

">  "3 

OT 

C3 

E 

o 

sz 

o 

o 

a>    £ 

o 

O 

c/> 

2 

CQ 

e 

0. 

5 

Q    CO 

z 

cc 

o 

-O 

O 

•o 

a> 

*v- 

a>  .c 

— 

— 1 

M 

c/5 

CO 

a> 

a. 
o 

o 

C 

1 

o 

c 

0) 

-*: 
o 
o 

a, 

s 

5 

XI 

o 

a 

o 

CT 

a. 

"O 

o 
o 

-C 

■o 

en 
c 

t:  ^, 

'a. 

<D 

c    .e    .e 


©    c    i_     o>  ~ 
^    p  —    i-     p 


<    (0   O   ffl   <    t-  <o         _ii- 

<05  12[]OI|OO 


26  THE    SETTING 

unit  containing  several  villages  with  that  of  a  single  village,  there  can 
be  little  doubt  that  the  reference  is  to  the  area  of  which  we  are  speak- 
ing. 

For  some  time  before  the  Nepalese  conquest  in  1804  and  the  British 
conquest  in  1815,  Sirkanda  was  included  with  the  rest  of  Bhatbair, 
the  Dehra  Dun  valley,  Tehri  Garhwal,  and  Garhwal  as  part  of  the 
kingdom  of  the  Garhwal  Raja.  Villagers  retain  a  good  deal  of  pride  in 
this  raja  as  contrasted  to  other  rajas,  albeit  they  can  also  recount  his 
tyranny  and  injustices.  There  are  several  tales  told  which  relate  his 
special  interest  in  the  tall,  powerful,  and  honest  residents  of  Sirkanda 
and  the  recognition  given  them  in  his  court.  In  the  later  days  of  the 
Garhwal  Rajas,  Sirkanda  was  one  of  five  villages  located  on  this  spur 
of  hills.  According  to  villagers  these  five  and  adjacent  lands  were  listed 
in  the  Raja's  records  as  being  the  revenue  responsibility  of  Matthu,  a 
hill  Brahmin  of  Kanda,  one  of  the  five  villages.  As  saycma,  or  tax  col- 
lector of  the  villages,  he  was  allowed  to  keep  a  considerable  portion  of 
his  collections  after  turning  over  an  annual  sum  to  the  Raja.  Bhatbair 
was  apparently 

one  of  those  curious  taluqs  or  clusters  of  several  villages,  so  prevalent  in  the 
.  .  .  hills,  which  are  cultivated  by  a  numerous  community  of  zamindars 
[landowners],  all  enjoying  separate  and  independent  proprietary  right  but 
at  the  same  time  all  bound  together  by  joint  responsibility  for  the  revenue 
assessed  on  the  whole  mahal.  (Walton,  1911a,  p.  109) 

Each  taluq  (called  khat  in  Jaunsar-Bawar  and  some  other  Pahari  areas) 
was  under  a  sayana  who  collected  land  revenue  for  the  Raja  from  the 
landholders  in  each  component  village.  At  one  time  the  landowners 
may  have  been  individually  responsible  directly  to  the  Raja  for 
revenue,  as  was  the  case  over  most  of  the  Kumaon  Himalaya  (cf.  Stowell, 
1907,  p.  iv;  Baden-Powell,  1892,  II,  p.  313).  Whether  cultivators  were 
individually  or  collectively  responsible  for  revenue,  ultimate  rights  in 
the  land  were  vested  in  the  Raja,  who  not  only  collected  revenue  but 
was  free  to  alienate  any  land  in  his  dominion  to  his  own  purposes — 
most  often  to  cede  it  to  people  he  wished  to  reward.  When  this  oc- 
curred, former  owners  suddenly  became  tenants  (cf.  Stowell,  1907,  pp. 
ix,  1-6,  31  f.). 

When  the  British  took  over  in  1815,  Bhatbair  was  joined  administra- 
tively with  the  Dehra  Dun  valley.  Due  to  the  accident  that  it  is  a  very 
small  hill  tract  in  a  district  made  up  primarily  of  people  of  the  plains, 
special  conditions  in  Bhatbair  have  been  ignored  in  the  various  revenue 
settlements.  For  revenue  purposes  Bhatbair  villages  have  usually  been 
treated  like  villages  of  the  valley.  Initially  the  revenue  settlement  for 


THE    SETTING  27 

Bhatbair  was  probably  made  with  the  sayana,  Matthu.  There  was  much 
vacillation  in  the  policies  of  early  revenue  officers  dealing  with  Dehra 
Dun  District,  some  favoring  development  of  a  landed  aristocracy  and 
acting  accordingly,  and  others  favoring  owner-cultivators  (cf.  Williams, 
1874,  pp.  200  ff.).  However,  under  the  British  a  Rajput  of  Kanda  is 
said  to  have  become  headman  of  Bhatbair,  which  had  come  to  include 
seven  villages.  He  wielded  considerable  influence  with  the  British,  and 
is  credited  with  having  pressed  for  the  rights  of  cultivators  and  having 
influenced  the  government  finally  to  allot  proprietary  rights  to  the 
lands  in  Bhatbair  in  equal  portions  to  the  principal  cultivating  fami- 
lies, who  thereafter  paid  reduced  taxes  directly  to  the  British  through 
a  local  tax  collector.  Matthu  and  his  descendants  then  lost  all  connec- 
tion with  the  lands  they  did  not  cultivate. 

At  that  time  Sirkanda  had  16  high-caste  cultivating  families.  Cul- 
tivated village  lands  were  divided  into  16  equal  parts,  and  equal  por- 
tions of  each  type  of  land  and  of  land  in  each  area  were  assigned  to 
each  of  the  16  families.  As  new  land  came  under  cultivation,  it  too  was 
divided  in  this  fashion.  In  continuation  of  local  tradition,  uncultivated 
lands,  trails,  and  certain  open  places  in  the  village  settlement  area 
were  deemed  to  be  the  common  property  of  the  village.  This  allot- 
ment, with  alterations  resulting  from  family  division,  inheritance,  and 
purchase,  has  remained  to  the  present.  This  system  is  referred  to  as 
the  "bhdichdra"  (custom  of  brothers)  system  of  land  tenure,  a  British 
introduction  to  the  area  which  Sirkanda  people  compare  most  favor- 
ably with  the  landlord-tenancy  system  retained  until  Independence  in 
nearby  Tehri  Garhwal  under  the  Raja. 

Another  portion  of  Bhatbair  and  lands  west  of  it  had  been  granted 
by  the  Raja  to  the  Sikh  religious  leader  who  founded  Dehra  Dun.  He 
exacted  rent  from  the  people  living  on  this  land,  people  who  had  until 
that  time  been  owner-cultivators.  The  British  honored  his  proprietor- 
ship, and  his  successors  continued  to  enjoy  this  revenue  until  well  after 
Independence;  in  fact,  they  still  hold  rights  to  some  of  the  land.  Sir- 
kanda lay  outside  this  estate,  though  some  Sirkanda-owned  lands  did 
not. 

Independence  was  never  an  important  issue  in  Sirkanda,  as  the 
British  government  was  looked  upon  without  disfavor.  No  government 
is  really  approved  of  by  these  people,  but  according  to  them  the  British 
government  was  not  meddlesome  and  was  preferable  to  that  of  the 
Raja.  After  Independence  there  were  revisions  in  administrative  pro- 
cedures and  in  taxation  policies  and  other  laws  affecting  Sirkanda.  The 
forests  and  other  uncultivated  lands  adjacent  to  the  village,  which 
provide  a  substantial  part  of  the  means  of  livelihood  in  the  hills  and 


28  THE    SETTING 

which  formerly  could  be  utilized  quite  freely,  were  nationalized.  Access 
to  their  products  and  the  right  to  cultivate  previously  uncultivated 
lands  were  sharply  curtailed.  This  was  the  most  resented  and  probably 
least  obeyed  of  the  many  unpopular  post-Independence  reforms  in 
these  hills.  Other  innovations,  such  as  village  panchayat  (council)  rule, 
community  development  work,  and  attempts  to  set  up  village  credit 
cooperatives,  were  largely  ignored  or  actively  opposed.  Where  the  ap- 
pearance of  conformity  seemed  desirable  it  was  provided,  but  nothing 
more.  The  government-supported  village  school,  established  in  1950, 
met  with  a  somewhat  more  favorable  reception.  The  role  of  the  govern- 
ment and  reactions  to  it  will  be  discussed  in  detail  in  chapter  9. 

Sirkanda  is  populated  by  Paharis  who  identify  themselves  as  such 
and  more  specifically  as  Garhwalis.  In  this  book  the  generic  term 
"Pahari"  will  be  used  to  refer  to  them  in  preference  to  the  more  spe- 
cific term  "Garhwali,"  except  where  a  contrast  is  intended.  This  is 
done  simply  because  that  is  the  term  most  used  by  the  people  themselves 
and  by  their  neighbors  on  the  plains  and  because  on  present  evidence 
it  seems  to  be  a  more  defensible  term  culturally  and  linguistically  than 
"Garhwali."  There  is  no  intention  of  minimizing  differences  among 
Pahari  areas,  most  of  which  have  yet  to  be  studied.  Sirkanda  is  rep- 
resentative of  the  following  areas,  in  order  of  decreasing  cultural  homo- 
geneity: Tehri  Garhwal,  Garhwal,  the  Central  Pahari  area,  and  the 
Pahari  area. 

The  people  of  Sirkanda  are  closely  attached  culturally,  linguistically, 
and  historically  to  their  relatives  in  Tehri  Garhwal,  though  for  150 
years  they  have  been  administratively  separated  as  a  result  of  British 
rule.  Theirs  is  one  of  the  three  largest  villages  within  Bhatbair.  It  is 
situated  on  the  crest  of  the  spur  of  mountains  comprising  Bhatbair, 
5,300  feet  above  sea  level,  facing  southeast,  2,300  feet  above  the  Bandal 
River  which  separates  it  from  Tehri  Garhwal  at  a  distance  of  one  mile, 
and  3,100  feet  above  Dehra  Dun,  which  is  ten  miles  to  the  southwest. 

The  history  of  Sirkanda  is  vague  in  the  minds  of  its  residents  and  is 
unrecorded  elsewhere.  Two  large  stone  fortifications  in  the  village 
overlook  the  steep  valley  of  the  Bandal  and  face  the  hills  of  Tehri 
Garhwal.  They  are  thirty  feet  square  and  constructed  of  stones  so  large 
and  heavy  that  it  is  believed  no  modern  mortals  could  have  placed 
them.  According  to  village  tradition  they  have  been  in  place  for  many 
millennia,  and  were  built  in  a  former  age  when  men  were  nine  yards 
tall,  lived  for  a  thousand  years,  and  were  supremely  intelligent.  The 
use  of  the  structures  is  unknown,  though  they  are  thought  to  have  been 
either  houses  or  forts.  Bricks  and  charcoal  have  been  found  around 
them  in  recent  excavations  for  housebuilding.  Such  fortifications  occur 


THE    SETTING  2  9 

throughout  Garhwal  and  are  responsible  for  its  name.  Fifty-two  major 
forts  are  frequently  cited  in  descriptions  of  Garhwal  (Sirkanda's  not 
among  them)  including  one  in  the  Dehra  Dun  valley.  They  are  thought 
by  historians  to  be  the  work  of  the  various  petty  rajas  who  ruled  small 
independent  states  in  these  hills  before  the  seventeenth  century.  One 
writer  attributes  them  to  the  pre- Aryan  indigenes  (Bahadur,  1916,  p.  70). 

Local  tradition  states  that  Kedarkhand  or  Garhwal,  of  which  Bhat- 
bair  is  a  part,  was  first  occupied  in  modern  times  by  hermits,  ascetics, 
and  sages  who  were  attracted  by  the  serenity  and  beauty  of  the  area 
to  spend  their  meditative  years  there  seeking  enlightenment.  The  springs 
which  provide  water  for  many  of  the  villages,  including  that  for  Sir- 
kanda,  are  thought  to  have  been  created  by  sages  who  did  so  miracu- 
lously in  order  to  provide  water  at  their  stopping  places.  Villagers  say 
that  some  of  these  ascetics  failed  to  keep  to  the  spiritual  life,  married, 
produced  children,  and  so  populated  these  hill  regions. 

In  view  of  Williams'  mention  of  Bhatbair  as  having  been  in  existence 
before  1700,  it  is  probable  that  Sirkanda  has  existed  for  at  least  300 
years.  Villagers'  estimates  run  to  1,000  years.  Among  its  current  resi- 
dents there  is  general  agreement  that  Sirkanda  was  founded  by  the 
ancestors  of  its  single  Brahmin  family,  who  came  from  Genogi,  a  vil- 
lage in  Tehri  Garhwal,  a  long  day's  trek  east  of  Sirkanda.  The  Brahmin 
family  soon  thereafter  brought  a  family  of  barber  caste  from  the  valley 
below  to  provide  them  with  agricultural  labor  and  barbering  service. 
Since  barbers  are  not  a  caste  indigenous  to  this  section  of  the  hills, 
their  functions  are  performed  by  other  low  castes  in  neighboring  vil- 
lages. These  were,  then,  the  first  two  families  in  Sirkanda.  Thereafter 
the  Khasiya  Rajputs,  who  today  form  87  per  cent  of  the  village  popula- 
tion, came  in.  Each  of  the  two  largest  Rajput  sibs  in  Sirkanda  claims 
to  have  preceded  the  other.2  Both  are  said  to  have  come  from  villages 
to  the  east,  in  Tehri  Garhwal.  The  drum-playing  Bajgi  family's  an- 
cestors also  came  from  Tehri,  shortly  after  the  Rajputs.  The  black- 
smith family  was  the  most  recent  arrival,  having  come  from  a  village 
35  trail  miles  to  the  northeast,  in  Tehri  Garhwal,  about  90  years  ago. 

It  is  thought  by  all  villagers  that  their  ancestors  came  ultimately  from 
"Kumaon,"  the  present  Almora  and  Naini  Tal  districts  adjacent  to 
Nepal.  From  there  they  moved  to  Tehri  Garhwal,  probably  to  escape 
political  and  economic  difficulties,  and  then  on  to  Sirkanda  to  find 
new  land  or  to  escape  the  pressures  of  local  rajas.  Their  origin  prior  to 
Kumaon  is  unknown,  though  some  believe  their  ancestors  must  have 
come  there  from  the  plains — perhaps  to  escape  the  Moghul  rulers — 
while  others  claim  they  have  always  lived  in  the  hills.  High-caste 
villagers  bear  the  names  of  sibs  and  phratries  (gotras)  found  on  the 


go  THE    SETTING 

plains.  This  may  reflect  plains  origin  or  merely  adoption  of  names  of 
Rajputs  who  fled  the  plains  to  live  among  the  hill-residing  Khasiyas. 
Both  explanations  may  be  correct  in  view  of  the  nature  of  plains-hills 
contacts.  Two  and  perhaps  three  of  the  four  Sirkanda  Rajput  sib  names 
are  among  those  listed  by  Tod  in  his  Annals  and  Antiquities  of 
Rajast'han  (1829,  p.  120)  as  being  among  the  "eighty-four  mercantile 
tribes"  of  Rajasthan:  "Pilliwal,"  "Khandailwal,"  "Kakulea,"  corre- 
sponding to  Palidl,  Khandial,  and  KukhalwalQ)  in  Sirkanda.  Two  and 
possibly  three  (JawaRl,  Palialp],  Khandial)  appear  among  the  116 
Rajput  groups  listed  by  Raturi  (1928,  pp.  167  ff.)  for  Garhwal.  Pos- 
sibly one  (Palial)  appears  among  102  listed  by  Bahadur  (1916,  pp.  96  ff.). 
The  Brahmin  family  of  Sirkanda  does  not  belong  to  any  of  the  68 
Brahmin  subgroups  listed  by  Bahadur.  The  barber  is  of  plains  origin. 
Bajgis  and  blacksmiths  both  are  populous  groups  in  Garhwal  and  ap- 
pear among  the  15  to  30  Pahari  Dom  groups  listed  by  Bahadur  and 
Raturi,  respectively. 

In  physical  appearance  Sirkanda  villagers  differ  little  from  plains 
people.  There  is  perhaps  a  tendency  toward  lighter  complexion  and 
narrower  features  among  the  high-caste  hill  peoples,  but  individual 
variation  virtually  obscures  this.  Much  more  distinctive  are  cultural 
traits,  and  these  are  often  mistaken  by  other  Indians  for  racial  traits. 
Paharis  are  noted  by  people  of  the  Dehra  Dun  valley  and  the  plains 
for  their  peculiarities  of  speech  and  dress  and  for  general  rusticity, 
much  as  are  hillbillies  in  America.  They  are  also  known  for  honesty 
and  bravery: 

Honesty  and  valour  are  possessed  in  ample  measure  by  the  Khasas.  Their 
honesty  is  beyond  question.  A  verbal  bargain  is  seldom  repudiated  and  theft 
is  almost  unknown.  .  .  .  The  military  exploits  of  the  Khasas  in  modern 
times  are  enshrined  in  the  records  of  the  39th  Royal  Garhwal  Rifles,  and 
we  find  that  the  descendants  of  the  ancient  Khasas  [reported  in  the  Mahab- 
harata]  are  endued  with  great  courage,  unyielding  and  obstinate  in  battle. 
(Joshi,  1929,  pp.  23  f.)3 

As  a  group,  Paharis  are  readily  identifiable  outside  their  own  area 
by  their  dress,  speech,  and  manners.  The  badge  of  the  Garhwali  man 
is  a  black  cap  and  cane.  Now  the  "fit  pajama"  (tight  from  the  knee 
down),  shirt,  dark  vest,  and  black  coat  are  in  vogue  for  special  occa- 
sions, with  a  wool  blanket  as  wrap.  Dhoti  (loincloth),  loose  pajama, 
shorts  or  abbreviated  loincloth,  shirt,  and  sometimes  coat  or  vest  are 
daily  wear.  Formerly  a  cap,  a  small  loincloth  secured  by  a  string,  and, 
for  cold  weather,  a  blanket  held  in  place  with  wooden  skewers  sufficed. 
Women  are  noted  for  their  massive  silver  jewelry,  and  the  large  gold 


THE    SETTING  31 

nose  ornaments  of  married  women.  They  do  not  wear  the  red  mark  at 
the  part  of  the  hair  which  designates  the  married  woman  of  the  ad- 
jacent plains,  nor  do  they  wear  the  red  beauty  spot  on  their  forehead. 
Their  hair  is  usually  braided  in  one  piece  down  the  back,  extended  by 
a  black  or  colored  artificial  hairpiece.  The  calves  of  their  legs  are  gen- 
erally decorated  with  tattoos.  Men  and  women  alike  often  have  tattoos 
on  hands  and  arms.  Women's  dress  consists  of  a  colorful  print  skirt,  a 
long  black  fitted  jacket  (or  sometimes  a  shirt  and  vest),  and  invariably 
a  head  scarf.  In  earlier  times  they  wore  a  long,  loose  blanket-like  gar- 
ment, the  fitted  jacket,  and  the  head  scarf.  They  are  not  secluded  in 
purdah  as  are  many  high-caste  plains  women.  To  one  familiar  with 
the  area  it  is  possible  to  determine  quite  precisely  the  locality  from 
which  a  Pahari  woman  comes  by  observing  the  details  of  her  dress  and 
jewelry  (Berreman,  1960b).  Regarding  Pahari  dress,  Traill's  comment  is 
as  applicable  today  as  it  was  in  1828: 

It  may  be  observed,  generally,  of  the  hill  people,  that  they  are  extremely 
indifferent  in  regard  to  the  state  of  their  every-day  apparel,  and  continue 
to  wear  their  clothes  till  reduced  to  mere  shreds  and  tatters,  but  on  holy- 
days  and  festivals,  individuals  of  either  sex  prefer  absenting  themselves  from 
the  festivities,  to  appearing  in  a  worn  out  garment.  (Traill,  1828,  p.  212) 

Sirkanda  is  strategically  located  in  the  sense  that  it  is  at  the  junction 
of  two  important  trails.  Several  villages  of  Bhatbair  and  the  adjacent 
section  of  Tehri  Garhwal  are  accessible  to  Dehra  Dun  only  via  one  of 
these  trails,  and  the  other  is  a  good  and  frequently  used  pack  trail 
built  in  1914  by  the  Tehri  Raja  to  enable  his  subjects  to  bypass  the 
toll-tax  collectors  of  Mussoorie  on  their  way  to  and  from  the  markets 
of  the  valley.  This  trail  is  still  a  trade  route  of  some  importance.  It 
connects  valley  markets  with  the  heavily  used  trade  and  pilgrimage 
route  between  Mussoorie  and  Tehri,  nine  trail  miles  from  Sirkanda. 

Until  recent  years  these  trails  were  used  by  Paharis  exclusively  for 
foot  traffic.  Governmental  employees  and  some  traders  used  pack 
animals  on  them.  Today  some  of  the  more  prosperous  high-caste  fam- 
ilies of  Sirkanda  and  other  villages  utilize  horses  or  mules  for  trans- 
porting goods.  However,  goods  of  all  types,  from  grain  to  roofing  ma- 
terials, are  still  carried  primarily  by  people — men  carrying  the  loads 
on  their  backs  and  shoulders,  women  balancing  the  burdens  on  their 
heads. 

Since  1930  a  motor  road  has  connected  Mussoorie  to  the  valley,  but 
this  does  not  directly  affect  Sirkanda  villagers  because  it  lies  in  a  dif- 
ferent direction.  Before  1930,  Rajpur,  which  is  a  small  town  seven 
miles  north  of  Dehra  Dun  at  the  foot  of  the  mountains  (seven  miles 


32  THE    SETTING 

south  of  Mussoorie  and  nine  trail  miles  west  of  Sirkanda),  was  the  end 
of  the  road.  Today  there  is  frequent  and  inexpensive  bus  service  from 
Rajpur  to  Dehra  Dun,  a  facility  used  by  Sirkanda  villagers  which  cuts 
the  walk  to  Dehra  Dun  from  sixteen  to  nine  miles.  Recently  a  motor- 
able  road  has  been  built  into  Sahas  Dhara,  a  small  market  and  place  of 
pilgrimage  five  miles  from  Sirkanda  on  the  trail  to  Dehra  Dun.  So  far 
its  use  has  been  limited  largely  to  the  trucks  of  a  limestone  quarrying 
company  for  whom  it  was  built,  and  there  is  no  bus  service  on  it.  Oc- 
casionally villagers  can  hire  empty  trucks  belonging  to  the  quarrying 
company  to  carry  heavy  loads  for  them  from  Dehra  Dun  to  this  point. 

The  village  has  features  in  common  with  others  of  the  Sub-Himalayan 
area,  and  is  reasonably  typical  of  those  in  Tehri  Garhwal.  Like  most 
Pahari  villages  and  unlike  many  villages  bordering  the  hills  in  the 
Dehra  Dun  valley,  Sirkanda  is  nucleated,  with  its  terraced  lands  oc- 
cupying the  steep  surrounding  hillsides.  Some  two-hundred  acres  of 
terraced,  cultivated  lands  lie  below  and  beside  the  village,  while  1,200 
acres  of  uncultivated  forest  and  scrub  land  administratively  attached 
to  Sirkanda  surround  the  cultivated  and  occupied  area.  The  village 
houses  are  scattered  for  almost  half  a  mile  along  the  southeast  contour 
of  a  hillside  overlooking  the  mountains  and  valleys  of  Tehri  Garhwal 
and  part  of  the  Dehra  Dun  valley.  There  are  nearly  sixty  of  the  char- 
acteristic stone  houses  with  gabled  slate,  thatch,  or  corrugated  iron 
roofs  supported  by  heavy  wooden  beams.  Most  of  them  are  two-storied 
with  an  outside  stone  stairway  and  a  narrow,  shelflike  porch  extending 
the  length  of  the  house  at  the  second  floor  level.  Open,  arched  verandas 
with  ornamentally  carved  columns  occupy  the  center  of  the  upper  level, 
with  closed  rooms  on  either  end  and  often  in  back  as  well.  The  rooms 
are  entered  by  doorways  off  the  veranda  and  have  small,  barred  win- 
dows for  ventilation  and  light.  Verandas,  doors  and  windows  open  on 
the  front,  which  is  almost  invariably  the  downhill  side.  The  backs,  and 
often  the  ends,  of  houses  are  entirely  closed.  The  family  occupies  the 
second  floor,  its  animals  the  first. 

Part  or  all  of  the  ceiling  is  boarded  over  to  provide  a  storage  garret, 
reached  by  a  ladder.  Here  are  kept  boards  and  implements.  Every  family 
has  the  necessary  agricultural  implements  or  tools  of  its  trade.  Two 
families  have  phonographs,  one  in  operating  condition.  The  Bajgis 
have  their  drums  and  harmonium  plus  a  sewing  machine  and  iron 
used  in  tailoring.  In  general,  high-caste  houses  are  larger  and  better 
equipped  than  others.  Wealth  is  to  some  extent  reflected  in  the  house 
and  its  contents,  but  the  difference  between  houses  of  the  well-off  and 
of  the  poor  is  not  as  great  as  in  most  non-Pahari  areas.  This  is  partly 


THE    SETTING  33 

because  differences  in  wealth  are  less,  but  is  also  due  to  consumption 
patterns  which  inhibit  conspicuous  display  of  wealth. 

Household  furnishings  are  few  and  simple.  One  or  two  of  the  inner 
rooms  contain  hearths  for  cooking.  Brass  and  iron  cooking  utensils,  a 
wooden  churn,  wooden  vessels  for  storage  of  liquids,  and  large  baskets 
and  wooden  cupboards  for  storage  of  dry  goods  are  also  found  in  these 
rooms.  Pottery  vessels  are  used  hardly  at  all  because  none  are  made  in 
this  area,  transportation  is  difficult,  and  they  break  easily.  Light  is 
given  by  small  oil  lamps.  Many  houses  have  string  cots,  the  typical 
Indian  bed,  but  this  is  a  relatively  recent  innovation  and  there  are 
never  enough  to  go  around.  Bedding  consists  of  quilts,  blankets,  and 
rugs  which  are  used  on  the  floor  if  beds  are  not  available.  People  usually 
sit  or  squat  on  the  dung-plastered  floor,  but  small  wooden  slabs  and 
pieces  of  leather  or  animal  pelts  may  also  be  used  for  this  purpose  and 
are  always  offered  guests.  Every  house  has  its  water  smoking  pipe  for 
the  use  of  all  its  members  and  guests. 

Circular  threshing  platforms  and  adjacent  storehouses  surround  the 
village,  which  is  composed  of  three  main  settlement  areas,  the  southern- 
most being  a  recent  addition  and  the  site  of  the  school.  Two  small 
shops  and  a  blacksmith's  workshop  are  out  of  sight  of  the  village,  over 
a  ridge  and  at  the  junction  of  the  main  trails  leading  into  Sirkanda. 
The  trail  leading  to  the  village  water  supply  goes  past  them,  and  nearby 
is  a  rain  pond  which  is  dry  half  the  year.  Smaller  trails  emanate  in  all 
directions  from  the  village  to  the  fields  and  to  neighboring  houses 
and  villages.  The  trails  are  for  the  most  part  rough,  steep,  and  often 
dangerous.  Every  year  mules,  horses,  and  cattle  plunge  off,  and  oc- 
casionally men  suffer  this  fate.  Travel  is  difficult  and  casual  visitors  are 
a  rarity. 

Although  fields  surround  the  village,  there  are  no  irrigated  lands 
near  Sirkanda.  The  village  water  supply  is  a  small  but  reliable  spring 
one-fourth  to  one-third  of  a  mile  from  the  village  on  the  opposite  and 
uncultivable  side  of  the  ridge.  The  spring's  proverbial  purity  and  re- 
liability apparently  compensate  for  its  inconvenience,  though  an  el- 
derly wife  of  Sirkanda  was  once  heard  to  mutter,  as  she  lifted  her  heavy 
water  pot  to  her  head  and  prepared  to  negotiate  again  the  difficult  trail 
to  the  village:  "I'd  like  to  set  fire  to  the  beard  of  the  man  that  founded 
this  village  here."  Villagers  want  to  pipe  the  water  into  the  village,  but 
the  ridge  forms  a  barrier.  As  a  result  of  one  abortive  attempt  to  improve 
the  situation,  a  small  pipe  brings  water  somewhat  closer  to  the  village 
but  this  water  is  considered  inferior  and  is  used  mainly  for  animals. 

Sirkanda  is  primarily  a  crop-raising  village  with  an  important  sec- 


34  THE    SETTING 

ondary  investment  in  animal  husbandry.  Normally  it  produces  more 
grain  than  its  residents  eat  in  a  year,  and  famine  is  virtually  unknown. 
Since  the  establishment  of  the  hill  station  and  military  cantonment  of 
Mussoorie  in  1829-1835,  a  six-hour  trek  from  Sirkanda  (and  only  half 
that  from  some  Sirkanda  cattle  sheds),  and  with  the  growth  of  Dehra 
Dun  and  adjacent  areas,  milk-selling  has  been  a  profitable  enterprise 
with  which  Sirkanda  villagers  supplement  the  traditional  agriculture. 
The  introduction  of  potatoes  as  a  cash  crop  in  the  hills  above  Sirkanda 
has  afforded  further  income  and  additional  traffic  past  the  village. 

The  poverty  of  Paharis  is  proverbial,  but  this  reputation  is  based  on 
their  frugality,  the  simple  clothing  and  equipment  they  possess  by 
plains  standards,  and  their  inelegant  and  unvaried  diet  wherein 
coarse  millets  substitute  for  rice.  They  do  not  share  the  precarious  life 
of  many  plains  people  in  food-deficit  areas.  They  have  sufficient  lands, 
regular  rainfall,  and  a  tradition  of  maintaining  the  productivity  of 
their  fields  by  crop  rotation  and  fertilizers,  so  that  they  have  a  con- 
sistently adequate  food  supply. 

Not  all  Sirkanda  lands  are  near  the  village,  and  not  all  people  known 
as  Sirkanda  villagers  live  in  Sirkanda.  As  population  has  increased, 
new  lands  have  been  opened  up  and  cultivated  on  the  hills  north  and 
south  of  the  village.  Today  villagers  cultivate  land  up  to  eight  trail 
miles  north  and  seven  trail  miles  south  of  Sirkanda,  on  the  same  spur 
of  hills,  at  altitudes  ranging  from  7,000  feet  to  2,000  feet  above  sea 
level.  In  order  to  tend  fields  and  livestock  at  these  distances,  it  is 
necessary  to  build  dwellings  near  them.  Such  field  houses  or  cattle 
sheds  are  called  chdns.  A  chan  is  defined  in  terms  of  location  and 
construction.  It  is  never  in  a  village,  though  it  may  be  very  near  one. 
It  is  generally  only  one  story  high,  unpartitioned,  and  is  less  finished 
inside  than  a  house  (ghar).  Usually  livestock  are  quartered  in  the  chan 
among  its  human  inhabitants,  whereas  in  a  house  livestock  are  always 
kept  downstairs  or  in  an  adjoining,  but  partitioned,  room.  Eleven  of 
the  71  Sirkanda-owned  dwellings  outside  of  Sirkanda  qualify  as 
"houses"  rather  than  "chans"  on  the  basis  of  location  or  construction. 
Chans  are  occupied  by  their  owners  during  planting  and  harvest  times, 
and  some  members  of  the  family  live  year-round  in  many  of  the  chans 
or  migrate  seasonally  between  low-altitude  winter  chans  and  high- 
altitude  summer  chans.  Formerly  chans  were  only  temporary  dwellings, 
but,  as  they  have  been  improved  and  as  families  have  grown,  many 
have  become  permanent.  The  71  Sirkanda  chans  and  second  houses 
are  owned  by  a  total  of  45  joint  families  and  are  to  be  found  in  31  dis- 
tinct locations  (see  map  2).  In  most  cases  the  village  affiliation  of  chan 
dwellers  is  strong,  and  they  are  readily  identified  as  Sirkanda  villagers 


THE    SETTING 


35 


by  themselves,  by  Sirkanda  people,  and  by  residents  of  other  villages 
and  chans.  This  in  spite  of  the  facts  that  they  no  longer  reside  in  the 
village,  that  other  villages  may  intervene  between  them  and  Sirkanda, 
and  that  they  may  be  surrounded  by  the  chans  of  other  villages.  While 
some  Sirkanda  chans  are  at  considerable  distances  from  Sirkanda,  chans 
of  other  villages  may  be  found  adjacent  to  Sirkanda.  On  the  other  hand, 
some  Sirkanda  chans  are  so  close  to  the  village  that  a  nonvillager  might 
not  distinguish  them  from  village  houses.  This  makes  village  census 
reporting  and  land  records  a  complex  and  difficult  matter.  The  prob- 
lem is  solved  in  official  reports  by  ignoring  it.  For  administrative 
purposes  village  membership  is  assigned  by  geographical  proximity, 
based  on  administrative  boundaries. 

Total  384 
Males  196  M  Females  188 


8765432      1012345678 
Total  population,  per  cent 

Usually  resident  in  Sirkanda    |       [Usually  resident  in  chan 
Fig.   1.  Sirkanda  population  pyramid,   1958. 


Of  a  total  Sirkanda  population  of  384,  only  178  people  are  usually 
resident  in  Sirkanda,  43  stay  there  at  regular  intervals  to  work  land, 
and  163  rarely  or  never  reside  there  (though  38  of  these  occupy  chans 
close  enough  to  afford  almost  daily  contact).  On  festive  or  ceremonial 
occasions  many  people  who  normally  live  away  return  temporarily  to 
the  village.  Women  move  from  chans  to  the  village  to  have  their  babies, 
and  elderly  people  usually  return  to  live  their  final  years  in  the  village. 

Chan  sites  may  develop  into  village  sites,  and  in  fact  this  is  a  means 
by  which  new  villages  are  often  formed.  Residence  in  a  cluster  of  chans 


g6  THE    SETTING 

can  gradually  lead  to  new  village  affiliation.  The  former  chan  status 
of  many  present-day  villages  is  revealed  in  the  village  names.  In  some 
of  these  locations  part  of  the  residents  consider  themselves  residents  of 
that  village,  while  others  maintain  their  ties  to  some  antecedent  village 
affiliation.  About  one-fifth  of  the  living  persons  (excluding  married 
daughters)  recorded  in  Sirkanda  genealogical  materials  as  having  been 
born  of  Sirkanda  families  are  no  longer  considered  to  be  affiliated  with 
Sirkanda,  though  their  origin  is  remembered.  Nearly  all  these  people 
now  live  in  locations  once  considered  to  be  chans.  There  are  undoubt- 
edly others  who  have  been  forgotten  or  are  no  longer  even  mentioned 
in  this  context.  People  who  belong  to  joint  families  with  a  dwelling  in 
the  settlement  area  of  Sirkanda  are  considered  by  all  to  be  Sirkanda 
villagers  regardless  of  where  they  live.  Anyone  who  separates  from  his 
joint  family,  taking  a  chan  and  the  lands  near  it  as  his  share  of  the 
property  and  giving  up  all  rights  in  the  village,  may  cease  to  be  con- 
sidered a  village  member;  certainly  his  children  will  not  be  considered 
members  of  the  ancestral  village. 

Other  important  extra-village  ties  are  those  of  marriage.  Over  80 
per  cent  of  Sirkanda  marriages  take  place  outside  the  village;  that  is, 
the  bride  comes  from  or  goes  to  an  alien  village.  This  makes  for  close 
ties  and  contacts  with  almost  100  villages;  most  of  the  ties  are  with 
villages  within  8  trail  miles  of  Sirkanda,  and  virtually  all  are  with 
Garhwali  villages  (see  map  2). 

Immigration  or  emigration  of  men  is  rare.  One  Bajgi  has  come  to 
live  in  Sirkanda  in  the  past  25  years.  Other  immigrants  are  the  five 
agricultural  servants  who  are  considered,  and  who  consider  themselves, 
to  be  temporary  residents.  In  addition  there  is  a  shopkeeper  from 
Rajpur  who  spends  considerable  time  in  his  shop  near  the  village.  In 
recent  years  a  schoolteacher  and  periodically  a  Village  Level  Worker 
and  Economic  Cooperative  Supervisor,  all  government  employees,  have 
lived  in  the  village  school.  In  the  past  ten  years  one  man  has  emigrated 
to  an  urban  area,  and  another  joined  him  during  1957.  Most  villagers 
who  have  left  the  village  have  returned.  A  few  have  disappeared. 

Garhwali  villages  are  so  constituted  that  no  one  village  is  likely  to 
have  the  range  of  castes  necessary  to  provide  the  occupational  variety 
required  for  maintenance  of  community  life.  This  brings  about  fur- 
ther intervillage  ties  of  economic  and  ritual  interdependence,  to  say 
nothing  of  the  social  ties  of  an  intra-caste,  intervillage  nature.  All 
such  factors  make  an  area  such  as  Bhatbair  (combined  with  an  equally 
large  adjoining  area  in  Tehri  Garhwal)  a  more  nearly  self-contained 
economic,  social,  and  religious  unit  than  the  village. 

Sirkanda  is  predominantly  a  Rajput  village;  87  per  cent  of  its  mem- 


THE    SETTING  37 

bers  are  of  this  caste.  The  one  Brahmin  family  adds  another  3  per  cent, 
making  90  per  cent  of  the  village  of  high  caste.  The  10  per  cent  who  are 
of  the  Dom  castes  include  two  households  of  blacksmiths,  one  of  bar- 
bers, and  four  of  musician-tailors  (Bajgis).  The  proportion  of  high 
castes  to  low  castes  is  almost  identical  to  that  found  throughout  Bhat- 
bair  and  Tehri  Garhwal.  However,  particular  villages  may  be  pre- 
dominantly or  even  exclusively  Brahmin.  In  some,  relatively  large 
proportions  of  low-caste  people  are  found,  while  in  many,  few  or  no 
low-caste  people  live. 

In  population  Sirkanda  is  above  the  average  for  Tehri  Garhwal 
villages.  In  caste  composition  it  is  not  unusual.  It  is  as  representative 
of  Tehri  Garhwal  villages  as  one  village  could  be  expected  to  be  ex- 
cept that  it  is  somewhat  less  isolated  than  most,  and  in  the  past  150 
years  its  administrative  history  has  been  at  variance  with  the  Tehri 
Garhwal  norm  and  similar  to  that  of  British  Garhwal  and  other  dis- 
tricts under  direct  British  rule.  The  effects  of  its  relative  lack  of  isola- 
tion and  its  subjection  to  British  rule  have  been  less  than  might  be 
expected  because  of  its  distance  from  Dehra  Dun,  the  difficulty  of 
access  to  that  administrative  center,  Sirkanda's  insignificance  in  the 
view  of  administrators,  and  the  fact  that  its  members'  attention  and 
identification  have  been  directed  throughout  its  history  primarily  to- 
ward the  northeast — into  Tehri  Garhwal. 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 


The  subsistence  base  in  Sirkanda,  as  in  most  Indian  villages,  is  agri- 
culture. Of  second  importance  and  closely  related  to  agriculture  is 
animal  husbandry.  Both  of  these  activities  are  primarily  the  province 
of  high-caste  villagers  but  are  open  to  and  practiced  by  some  members 
of  all  castes.  The  functional  unit  in  these  as  in  almost  all  economic 
matters  is  the  joint  family,  often  referred  to  as  the  household  (chula, 
cooking  hearth).  Goods  are  produced,  distributed,  and  consumed  pri- 
marily by  the  household  unit,  and  any  relevant  economic  decisions  are 
made  there.  In  Sirkanda  there  are  45  such  household  units  or  joint 
families,  averaging  eight  or  nine  individuals  each  but  ranging  in  mem- 
bership from  one  to  twenty-five.  The  household  is  ideally  a  patrilocal 
extended  family  under  the  leadership  of  the  eldest  active  male.  In  prac- 
tice we  find  that  32  (71  per  cent)  of  the  households  in  Sirkanda  are  of 
this  type,  including  seven  which  consist  of  only  a  nuclear  family  and 
one  parent  of  the  husband.  Thirteen  (29  per  cent)  consist  of  strictly 
nuclear  family  units.  Eighty-four  per  cent  of  the  population  lives  in 
extended  family  groups.  Nonagricultural  castes  and  families  tend  to  be 
divided  into  more  and  smaller  independent  units  than  are  agricul- 
turists. 

Improved  land  and  livestock,  the  main  forms  of  capital  in  this  area, 
are  owned  and  manipulated  by  the  joint  family,  and  their  products  are 
shared  within  it.  Ideally  the  joint  family  occupies  one  large  house  with 
separate  rooms  for  each  nuclear  family  when  they  are  in  the  village, 
and  shares  one  or  more  chans  when  they  are  out.  In  reality  some  fam- 
ilies own  more  than  one  house  in  Sirkanda,  so  that  all  their  members 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  39 

do  not  live  under  one  roof,  while  others  are  crowded  with  more  than 
one  nuclear  family  per  room.  Nearly  all  have  chans,  many  of  which 
are  almost  continuously  occupied  by  some  nuclear  families  of  the 
household.  Members  of  the  joint  family  who  live  under  a  single  roof 
eat  from  the  same  cooking  fire  (the  literal  meaning  of  chula),  and  all 
members,  regardless  of  living  arrangements,  eat  from  the  same  store 
of  food. 


Land 

Since  agriculture  is  the  basis  of  livelihood  in  Sirkanda,  land  is  of 
utmost  importance.  At  least  one  popular  Pahari  song  concerns  a  hero 
who  fought  to  the  death  rather  than  lose  land  which  was  rightfully 
his.  Sirkanda  families  own  298  acres  of  cultivated  land,  according  to 
records  of  the  village  accountant.  These  include  176  acres  in  the  im- 
mediate vicinity  of  the  village  and  122  acres  in  outlying  areas,  tended 
from  chans  or  other  houses.  As  previously  noted,  about  half  the  cur- 
rent village  population  usually  lives  in  the  71  Sirkanda  chans  and  other 
houses  in  31  separate  locations  extending  over  fifteen  trail  miles  north 
and  south  of  the  village  settlement  area  (see  map  2).  Some  idea  of  the 
fragmentation  of  village  lands  can  be  gathered  from  the  following 
figures.  Two  hundred  and  five  acres  are  recorded  as  cultivated  "Sir- 
kanda lands."  x  The  land  is  officially  divided  into  745  separate  plots 
varying  in  size  from  less  than  one-tenth  of  an  acre  to  seven  acres. 
These  figures  are  based  on  long-standing  recorded  divisions  of  land. 
In  reality  the  plots  have  been  subdivided  into  smaller  parts  as  the  old 
extended  families  have  broken  up.  Today  there  are  1,144  separate  land 
claims  recorded  for  the  745  plots,  and  unrecorded  but  recognized  di- 
visions probably  bring  the  number  of  separately  cultivated  plots  to 
nearly  1,500. 

Cultivated  land  is  categorized  by  villagers  in  several  ways  relevant 
to  its  productivity.  Probably  the  most  important  distinction  is  between 
land  which  is  irrigated  and  that  which  is  not.  Most  Sirkanda  land  is 
unirrigated.  Only  three  acres  out  of  205  are  recorded  as  being  irrigated 
and  hence  unusually  valuable.  Sirkanda-owned  land  in  lower-lying 
areas  is  often  irrigated.  While  records  for  these  lands  were  unobtain- 
able, crop  yields  for  rice  indicate  that  16  Sirkanda  households  own  25 
to  30  acres  of  such  valuable  land,  while  29  households  own  none.  Some 
Bhatbair  villages  are  located  in  the  river  valley  and  have  considerably 
more  irrigated  land.  Another  valuable  type  of  land  is  that  at  higher 
altitudes  and  on  north  slopes  suitable  for  growing  potatoes.  Twenty- 
one  Sirkanda  families  have  such  lands,  totaling  around  15  acres. 


40  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

Although  irrigated  land  and  potato  land  are  the  most  valuable, 
neither  is  necessary  for  livelihood.  The  traditional  economy  of  Sir- 
kanda  is  based  upon  dry-land  grain  agriculture,  and  dietary  staples 
are  grown  on  dry  lands  in  amounts  exceeding  consumption  rates. 

Villagers  recognize  and  terminologically  distinguish  several  types  of 
land  other  than  those  based  on  irrigation.  The  two  most  important  of 
these  classifications  are  by  soil  type  and  exposure  to  the  sun.  The  best 
soil  is  classed  as  "loamy,"  while  inferior  soil  is  "rocky."  Fields  on  the 
sunny  (generally  south)  side  of  slopes  are  preferred.  Fields  on  the 
shady  (north)  slope,  called  "place  of  moisture,"  are  considered  less 
productive  of  the  staple  crops.  Consequently  they  are  chosen  for  cul- 
tivation when  no  more  sunny-side  slopes  are  available,  although  some 
villages  are  so  situated  that  all  their  fields  are  of  this  type.  For  certain 
crops,  such  as  potatoes,  and  in  exceptionally  dry  seasons  shady  fields 
are  superior.  All  Sirkanda  lands  near  the  village  are  on  the  sunny  slope, 
and  more  than  half  are  on  loamy  soil.  Fields  are  also  classified  in  terms 
of  terrain;  level  ones  are  preferred  to  those  on  slopes.  All  Sirkanda 
lands  near  the  village  are  on  slopes  and  are,  of  necessity,  terraced. 
Vertical  stone  walls  three  to  eight  feet  high  follow  the  contour  of  the 
hills  to  retain  the  soil  of  these  terraces.  Entire  hillsides  of  scores  of 
acres  are  so  terraced.  Fields  located  below  the  village,  as  are  most 
Sirkanda  fields,  are  considered  preferable  to  those  above  the  village 
because  of  the  greater  ease  of  carrying  fertilizer  to  them. 

As  a  result  of  constant  fertilization  of  fields  with  animal  manure  and 
the  burned  and  raw  stalks  of  harvested  crops,  combined  with  system- 
atic crop  rotation,  most  fields  produce  consistently  good  crops.  Certain 
distant  fields  which  are  too  inaccessible  for  easy  fertilization  are  simply 
used  until  they  become  exhausted,  after  which  they  are  left,  perma- 
nently or  until  they  have  regained  their  vitality. 

Land  ownership  by  households  shows  the  expectable  caste-based 
variation.  The  ten  per  cent  of  the  population  who  make  up  the  low 
castes  own  only  two  per  cent  of  the  land.  In  the  days  of  the  Garhwal 
Raja's  dominion,  low  castes  were  not  allowed  to  own  land  or  houses  at 
all.  This  was  the  situation  in  nearby  Tehri  Garhwal  until  after  Inde- 
pendence in  1947.  In  Sirkanda  it  ceased  to  be  the  rule  when  the  British 
took  over  in  1815,  but  it  has  continued  to  influence  practice  in  this 
area  to  the  present.  It  was  possible  under  the  Raja  for  high-caste  land- 
owners in  the  village  to  grant  land  or  buildings  to  low-caste  members 
for  use  rent-free,  and  land  was  regularly  granted  as  a  reward  for  services 
or  to  enable  a  service-caste  family  to  make  a  living  in  the  village  and 
provide  their  services  to  villagers.  However,  the  tenant  was  not  allowed 
to  sell  or  rent  the  land,  and  at  his  death  or  at  the  owner's  discretion 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  41 

the  property  reverted  to  the  owner.  During  British  rule  each  of  the 
low-caste  families  of  Sirkanda  managed  to  get  some  such  lands  re- 
corded in  their  names. 

Brief  reference  has  already  been  made  to  the  history  of  land  tenures 
in  Bhatbair.  The  pattern  of  land  ownership  which  exists  today  in 
Sirkanda  dates  from  the  early  days  of  British  rule,  when  the  bhaichara 
system  of  land  allotment  in  equal  portions  to  cultivating  families  was 
established.  At  the  time  there  were  sixteen  cultivating  households  in 
Sirkanda,  one  family  of  Brahmins  and  the  others  of  Rajputs.  The 
sixteen  divisions  of  cultivated  land  averaged  about  eleven  acres  each. 
As  new  lands  came  under  cultivation  they  were  similarly  apportioned. 
Since  that  time,  as  lands  have  been  divided,  bought,  and  sold,  they 
have  retained  the  designation  of  the  caste  or  sib  of  the  original  owner 
as  patti  Brahmin  (Brahmin  section),  patti  Palial  (Palial  Rajput  sec- 
tion), and  so  on,  for  identification  purposes.  Uncultivated  lands  were 
held  by  the  village  in  common. 

Under  the  bhaichara  system  low-caste  members  did  not  get  shares 
in  village  lands,  but  they  were  assigned  the  small  plots  that  had  been 
previously  granted  them  by  the  high  castes  or  that  were  subsequently 
given  to  them.  In  this  fashion  the  blacksmiths,  for  example,  acquired 
slightly  over  two  acres.  Half  this  land  had  been  granted  by  the  village 
tax-free;  that  is,  it  remained  in  the  names  of  former  owners,  who  con- 
tinued to  pay  its  taxes.  The  other  half  had  been  given  to  the  black- 
smiths outright.  The  lands  given  outright  were  not  assigned  by  name 
but  instead  were  recorded  as  having  been  allotted  to  "blacksmiths." 
Later  a  friendly  village  accountant  recorded  all  this  land  in  the  indi- 
vidual names  of  the  blacksmith  owners,  thus  protecting  their  interests. 
The  other  low  castes  were  granted  land  in  similar  fashion,  so  that  the 
barber  family  had  nearly  1%  acres  and  the  Bajgi  family  had  nearly  3 
acres.  Virtually  all  low-caste  lands  are  on  steep,  rocky,  unproductive 
soil,  some  of  such  poor  quality  that  it  is  hardly  worth  cultivating  and 
would  be  spurned  by  high-caste  agriculturists.  This  reflects  the  nature 
of  high-caste  generosity  to  the  service  castes. 

Under  this  system  there  are  said  to  have  been  only  two  classes  of 
landowners  in  Sirkanda,  in  contrast  to  the  many  types  recognized  else- 
where: (1)  the  original  sixteen  owners,  who  paid  the  government  tax 
on  the  land  they  acquired  under  the  bhaichara  division,  and  cultivated 
it  or  let  it  out  as  they  wished;  (2)  those  who  cultivated  lands  not  al- 
lotted to  them  under  the  bhaichara  system  and  to  which  they  therefore 
did  not  have  title.  In  Sirkanda  most  agriculturists  were  in  the  former 
category,  although  some  families  who  had  more  land  than  they  could 
use  let  part  of  it  out  to  those  who  had  too  little  from  their  bhaichara 


42  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

shares  to  support  their  enlarged  families.  Under  bhaichara  these  non- 
owning  cultivators  (tenants  or  kachcha  khaikars,  cf.  Stowell,  1907,  p.  ix) 
paid  the  amount  of  the  taxes  to  the  owners  but  in  most  cases  paid  no 
rental  beyond  that  amount.  This  is  in  striking  contrast  to  lands  not 
included  under  bhaichara,  such  as  some  in  Bhatbair  that  were  owned 
by  the  Sikh  founder  of  Dehra  Dun  and  his  successors.  In  such  cases 
the  landlord  collected  an  amount  several  times  the  government  tax  and 
kept  all  except  the  tax  money  for  himself. 

With  Independence  bhaichara  lands  went  to  the  cultivators.  Non- 
cultivating  owners  were  reimbursed  by  the  government  in  the  amount 
of  ten  years'  tax  on  the  land  they  were  to  relinquish.  Nonowner  cul- 
tivating tenants  were  assessed  an  amount  equal  to  ten  years'  tax  on  the 
land  they  occupied  and  then  were  recorded  as  its  owners.  Each  owner 
thereafter  paid  the  taxes  on  his  own  land,  direct  to  the  government. 
Taxation  on  owner-cultivated  lands  in  Sirkanda  has  become  slightly 
higher  since  Independence  (from  around  Rs.  1.50  per  acre  before  to 
Rs.  1.75  after).2  For  non-bhaichara  land,  the  cultivators'  taxes  have 
greatly  decreased  since  Independence  because  the  landlord  middleman 
has  been  eliminated.  This  decrease  in  the  affected  portions  of  Bhatbair 
and  nearby  Tehri  Garhwal  has  been  from  about  Rs.  4.50  to  Rs.  1.75  per 
acre.  The  precise  amount  of  tax  is  a  function  of  the  quality  of  the  land 
as  recorded  by  the  government.  In  an  official  threefold  categorization 
of  Sirkanda-owned  lands,  none  around  Sirkanda  is  of  first  quality,  and 
most  is  third  and  therefore  least  heavily  taxed. 

Under  bhaichara,  when  a  joint  family  dissolved,  land  was  to  be 
divided  equally  among  sons  and  each  son's  portion  was  to  be  divided 
equally  among  his  sons  if  they  separated.  These  "ancestral  fractional 
shares"  were  to  be  officially  recorded  at  the  time  of  division.  Each 
holder  would  then  pay  his  share  of  the  taxes,  depending  upon  the 
proportion  of  village  lands  he  held.  In  practice  the  division  was  gen- 
erally done  informally  and  went  unrecorded;  hence  the  chaotic  state 
of  land  records  at  present.  Today  three  families — two  of  the  Rajputs 
and  the  one  Brahmin  family — retain  their  original  yi6  portion  of  vil- 
lage lands  undivided.  This  retention  has  been  possible  because  the 
families  have  remained  relatively  small.  Consequently  they  are  among 
the  best-off  of  villagers.  In  1958  the  Brahmin  family  was  preparing 
to  divide  its  lands  among  three  brothers,  so  that  only  two  of  the  orig- 
inal shares  would  remain  intact.  Some  bhaichara  portions  have  been 
divided  into  four  or  more  parts,  though  often  these  have  been  supple- 
mented (in  at  least  one  case  to  an  extent  exceeding  the  original  share) 
by  lands  subsequently  purchased  outside  the  village. 

Land  is  the  basis  of  livelihood,  and  those  who  control  it,  primarily 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  43 

the  high  castes,  control  the  economy.  Ownership  of  land,  and  especially 
of  good  land,  is  highly  correlated  with  wealth.  It  is  not,  however, 
sufficient  in  itself  to  ensure  wealth.  There  must  also  be  manpower  to 
work  the  land.  Land  that  is  unused  is  of  no  benefit  to  anyone.  One  of 
the  wealthiest  families  in  Sirkanda  at  present — the  possessors  of  one 
of  the  original  undivided  shares  of  village  lands — was  poverty-stricken 
two  generations  ago  when  the  sole  member  of  the  family  was  a  teen-age 
boy  who  could  not  work  the  land  properly  and  so  had  to  hire  out  as  a 
servant  to  others  to  make  a  living.  Years  later,  when  he  and  a  son  were 
both  able  to  farm  and  to  hire  a  servant  as  well,  he  made  profitable  use 
of  the  same  lands.  Acquisition  of  extra  wives,  servants,  and  adopted 
sons  are  means  used  to  increase  the  labor  force  in  a  household  and 
thereby  to  derive  more  benefit  from  the  land. 

Although  there  is  variation  in  wealth  and  land  ownership  by  family 
and  by  caste,  there  are  no  big  landholders  in  the  sense  of  the  "zamin- 
dars"  of  the  plains,  and  there  are  no  tenant  farmers  in  Sirkanda.  Sir- 
kanda agriculturists  are  owner-cultivators;  they  live  by  their  own  work 
on  their  own  lands.  The  biggest  landholding  recorded  in  Sirkanda  is 
20.4  acres,  owned  by  a  joint  family  of  22  individuals  (nine  adults, 
thirteen  children  below  16  years  of  age).  The  smallest  holding  by  an 
agricultural  family  (that  is,  one  of  high  caste,  though  some  of  the  low- 
caste  families  own  none)  is  2.3  acres,  supporting  six  people  (two  adults, 
four  children).  The  average  size  of  recorded  holdings  in  the  agricul- 
tural castes  is  4.5  acres  per  eight-  or  nine-member  joint  family.  Most 
agricultural  families  have  about  one-half  acre  per  adult,  counting  two 
children  as  equivalent  to  one  adult.  Some  have  less,  and  the  most  pros- 
perous have  one  acre  per  adult. 

There  is  little  rental  or  sharecropping  of  lands  in  Sirkanda.  One  man 
has  a  share  in  some  lands  owned  by  his  wife's  relatives  in  a  distant 
village.  Another  lets  out  on  shares  some  lands  he  owns  that  are  too  far 
away  for  him  to  look  after.  One  man,  whose  lands  were  too  scattered 
for  him  to  look  after,  effected  a  mutually  advantageous  exchange  of 
lands  with  another  farmer  so  that  lands  of  each  were  somewhat  con- 
solidated. Occasionally  some  elderly  or  dependent  person  who  cannot 
tend  his  or  her  land  will  rent  it  out  to  others  on  a  share  basis,  as  one 
Sirkanda  widow  does.  Others  sell  land  they  can  no  longer  work.  More 
commonly,  the  owner  gives  the  land  to  whoever  is  slated  to  inherit  it 
and  joins  that  household  for  the  remainder  of  his  lifetime.  Several 
instances  of  the  latter  arrangement  are  in  evidence  in  Sirkanda. 

Until  Independence  it  was  possible  for  any  agriculturist  to  extend 
his  holdings  by  cultivating  previously  uncultivated  land.  The  primary 
requisite  was  labor — it  is  hard  and  time-consuming  work  to  clear  and 


44  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

terrace  new  land.  The  availability  of  land  prevented  the  pressure  on 
land  common  in  much  of  North  India.  An  expanding  Pahari  agri- 
cultural family  in  this  area  could  usually,  with  effort,  expand  its  hold- 
ings. 

For  low  castes  the  story  is  different.  In  pre-British  times  they  were 
prohibited  from  owning  land  and  from  cultivating  new  land  without 
permission  from  high-caste  villagers.  Under  the  British  they  were  pro- 
hibited by  informal  but  effective  village  sanctions  from  seeking  new 
lands.  They  were  prevented  from  becoming  economically  independent 
rather  than  from  farming  at  all.  This  situation  has  continued  to  the 
present  when,  as  will  be  discussed  in  the  context  of  intercaste  relations, 
a  blacksmith  has  been  denied  access  to  unused  land  in  Sirkanda  by  the 
high-caste  village  council.  Thus,  low  castes  have  been  kept  dependent 
and  poor  while  both  cultivated  lands  and  population  have  increased. 

Throughout  the  period  since  1815,  the  main  settlement  of  Sirkanda 
is  said  to  have  remained  about  the  same  in  population.  Records 
of  land  within  the  village  boundaries  show  very  little  change  since 
1904.  However,  in  this  time  lands  outside  the  village  have  come 
under  cultivation  or  have  been  purchased  until  the  village  cultivates 
twice  as  much  land  as  formerly.  Also,  the  lands  have  been  increasingly 
fragmented.  The  resident  population  of  Sirkanda  has  remained  about 
150  or  175,  but  the  population  of  Bhatbair  and  vicinity  has  doubled 
or  tripled.  Additional  village  population  has  been  drained  off  to  chans 
and  second  houses.  The  number  of  villages  in  Bhatbair  has  doubled 
since  1815.  Chans,  which  were  a  rarity  then,  have  been  built  and  fields 
cleared  where  there  was  previously  only  wilderness.  The  trend  is 
evident  even  in  the  period  since  Independence  with  the  addition  of  new 
lands  and  new  chans  in  several  locations.  Within  Sirkanda  the  entire 
southern  section  of  the  village,  comprising  five  houses,  is  a  post- 
Independence  phenomenon.  As  old  houses  in  the  village  have  become 
decrepit  or  crowded,  new  ones  have  been  built  in  the  new  location.  New 
lands  have  been  opened  up  on  the  southern  periphery  of  the  village 
surrounding  the  new  houses.  It  is  one  of  the  ironies  of  the  post- 
Independence  era  that  governmental  restrictions  have  been  imposed 
which  discourage  expansion  of  agricultural  lands  into  hitherto  un- 
cultivated areas.  This  is  a  source  of  keen  resentment  among  high-caste 
Paharis  of  this  region  because,  until  Independence,  uncultivated  lands 
had  been  considered  the  property  of  the  villages  nearest  them,  and 
available  to  their  members  for  cultivation.  Now  they  have  been  made 
subject  to  stringent  governmental  regulation.  As  one  Sirkanda  farmer 
pointed  out:  "The  government  asked  us  to  increase  crop  production 
to  help  the  nation.  When  we  did  so  in  the  only  way  possible,  by  open- 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  45 

ing  up  new  lands,  they  accused  us  of  infringing  on  government  property 
and  brought  a  suit  against  us." 

Agriculture 

Agriculture  is  a  family  enterprise — those  who  share  the  hearth 
share  in  the  work  and  the  harvest.  There  are  two  annual  crops  and 
harvests  which  govern  the  work  of  villagers  and  influence  the  yearly 
cycle  of  all  activities  in  Sirkanda.  These  are  "millet  harvest"  in  early 
winter  (mid-September  to  October)  just  after  the  rainy  season,  and 
"barley-wheat  harvest"  in  mid-summer  (April)  before  the  hot,  dry  pe- 
riod. These  correspond  to  the  kharif  and  rabi  harvests  of  the  plains, 
respectively,  but  are  not  called  by  these  terms.  Each  planting  season 
follows  closely  after  the  previous  harvest. 

Winter  Crop 

While  the  millet  harvest  is  in  progress,  men  of  each  family  begin 
plowing  the  harvested  fields  preparatory  to  planting  the  principal 
winter  crops,  wheat  and  barley.  Stalks  of  the  previous  crops  are  burned 
and  the  ashes  are  plowed  into  the  ground  along  with  manure,  which 
has  been  spread  on  the  fields.  The  plow,  similar  to  those  used  on  the 
plains,  is  wooden  with  a  wooden  moldboard  and  an  iron  bit  and  is 
pulled  by  a  yoke  of  bullocks.  A  week  or  two  after  plowing  men  sow 
the  fields  by  hand  broadcast.  Immediately  thereafter  the  fields  are 
again  plowed  and  a  leveler  is  dragged  over  them.  The  fields  are  plowed 
and  seeded  between  mid-October  and  the  end  of  November.  Ideally, 
approximately  equal  proportions  of  land  are  devoted  to  wheat  and 
barley.  In  reality,  wheat,  the  preferred  crop,  may  be  sown  in  two- 
thirds  of  the  available  200  acres  of  land  in  the  vicinity  of  Sirkanda. 
Masitr  (Ervum  lens),  a  pulse,  is  also  planted  at  this  time  but  in  much 
smaller  quantities.3  Some  land  is  left  fallow.  Once  planting  is  com- 
pleted the  main  agricultural  activity  is  transporting  animal  manure 
and  spreading  it  on  the  fields.  This  is  done  two  or  three  times  after 
planting,  at  intervals  of  about  a  month. 

In  February  and  March,  over  a  month  before  harvest  time,  the 
fields  that  have  been  left  fallow  over  the  winter  are  plowed  for  the 
first  time  in  preparation  for  planting  janghora  (Oplismenus  frumen- 
taceus),  a  millet  which  is  one  of  the  principal  crops  of  the  rainy  grow- 
ing season.  The  plowing  continues,  twice  per  field,  over  a  period  of 
six  weeks,  overlapping  with  the  barley  harvest,  since  barley  fields  as 
well  as  fallow  ones  will  be  planted  in  janghora.  Toward  the  end  of 
March  and  in  early  April  barley  and  masur  are  harvested,  and  the 


46  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

fields  are  plowed  after  the  stubble  or  stalks  have  been  burned.  Wheat 
matures  shortly  after  the  other  winter  crops  and  is  harvested  in  mid- 
April.  As  wheat  is  harvested  threshing  begins.  This  is  done  by  driving 
cattle  over  the  grain  heads,  which  have  been  spread  on  a  hard,  dung- 
plastered  circular  threshing  floor.  The  cattle,  two  to  ten  in  number, 
are  hitched  to  a  central  post  and  driven  around  by  people  of  almost 
any  age  and  either  sex.  It  is  an  eight-  to  ten-hour  job  to  thresh  one 
batch  of  about  two  maunds  (160  pounds)  of  unthreshed  grain.  There- 
after the  grain  is  winnowed  by  women  in  traditional  North  Indian 
fashion  with  a  winnowing  tray  and  the  aid  of  the  breeze.  Finally  ashes 
are  mixed  with  the  grain  "to  prevent  worms  from  infesting  it."  Women 
do  this  by  trampling  the  grain  and  ashes  on  a  threshing  platform.  It 
is  then  stored  in  the  home  in  large  baskets  sealed  with  dung-plaster  or 
in  wooden  storage  boxes.  Each  family  spends  about  two  weeks  at 
threshing,  winnowing,  and  storing.  Since  not  every  family  owns  a 
threshing  platform  (there  are  21  platforms  in  the  village),  they  are 
borrowed  for  further  use  as  soon  as  the  owners  are  finished.  Such 
borrowing  occurs  freely  across  sib  and  caste  lines.  The  chaff  is  burned 
and  the  straw  is  saved  and  stored  in  tall  stacks  supported  by  central 
poles  or  saplings,  to  be  used  later  as  thatch  or  fodder. 

Rainy-Season  Crop 

Before  and  during  the  wheat  and  barley  threshing  period,  janghora 
is  planted  in  the  same  manner  as  was  wheat  the  previous  season.  Con- 
currently, the  harvested  wheat  fields  are  burned  over  and  plowed. 
After  plowing  they  are  left  for  about  two  weeks  and  then  planted  with 
rainy-season  crops  other  than  janghora,  primary  among  which  is  a 
millet  called  khoda  or  mandud  (Eleusine  coracana).  Janghora  and 
khoda  are  the  principal  rainy-season  crops,  forming  about  75  per  cent 
of  the  grain  product  of  the  season.  They  are  planted  in  roughly  equal 
amounts.  At  the  same  time  are  planted  kulat  (Dolichos  biflorus),  a 
pulse,  and  chauldi  {Amaranthus  polygamous,  Amaranthus  blitum),  an 
amaranth  which  supplies  a  grain  (forming  about  20  per  cent  of  the 
grain  harvest  of  this  season)  and  also  leaves  which  are  used  as  vege- 
tables. Other  crops  of  the  season  include  dry  and  wet  rice,  taro,  pump- 
kins, beans,  corn,  ginger,  chili,  cucumbers,  leafy  vegetables,  and  to- 
bacco. Wet  rice  is  planted  at  this  time  in  seedbeds  in  areas  where 
irrigation  is  possible.  At  the  beginning  of  the  rains  (late  June)  wet 
rice  is  transplanted  from  seedbeds  to  irrigated  fields,  and  chili  plants 
are  transplanted  to  Sirkanda  gardens  from  irrigated  seedbeds  else- 
where. 

The  fields  are  manured  during  the  rainy  season  just  as  they  were 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  47 

in  the  winter.  From  shortly  after  the  rains  begin,  in  July,  until  the 
first  of  September,  harrowing,  followed  by  weeding  of  the  fields,  is  a 
full-time  job.  First  the  fields  are  harrowed  from  one  to  three  times 
each  with  a  long-toothed  harrow  pulled  by  bullocks.  This  has  the 
effect  of  thinning  the  fields,  which  were  purposely  overseeded  to  pre- 
vent erosion  and  uprooting  of  the  seedlings  by  the  heavy  rains.  It  is 
also  alleged  to  kill  weeds,  the  belief  being  that  grain  withstands  the 
disturbance  better  than  weeds  do.  Some  incidental  transplanting  may 
be  done  at  the  same  time  to  even  out  plant  distribution  in  the  fields. 
Thereafter  the  fields  are  repeatedly  and  painstakingly  weeded  by  hand 
by  the  entire  families,  using  small  pick-like  tools.  By  the  first  of  Sep- 
tember weeding  is  no  longer  necessary,  and  the  harvest  begins  in  late 
September.  First  janghora,  corn,  and  beans  are  harvested,  followed  in 
about  two  weeks  by  khoda,  chaulai,  kulat,  and  the  rainy-season  crops. 
The  harvest  continues  to  the  end  of  October.  Threshing  of  the  millets 
extends  throughout  October  and  overlaps  with  plowing  and  sowing 
for  the  winter  crops. 

Maximizing  Productivity 

In  the  planting  of  crops  there  is  an  ideal  pattern  of  crop  rotation 
said  to  enhance  the  productivity  of  the  soil.  The  sequence  in  an  in- 
dividual field  is  as  follows:  (1)  barley,  followed  by  (2)  janghora  or 
dry  rice,  followed  by  (3)  wheat,  followed  by  (4)  khoda,  followed  by 
(1)  barley,  and  so  on.  Although  the  sequence  is  not  adhered  to  re- 
ligiously, it  is  a  traditional  pattern  that  is  approximated  by  most 
farmers  in  Sirkanda.  Periodically  crops  not  included  in  the  rotating 
sequence  are  planted  in  some  of  the  fields.  Any  field  that  appears  to 
be  losing  its  vitality  as  evidenced  by  smaller  crops  is  left  fallow  for  a 
season  or  two.  The  above  pattern  applies  only  to  fertilized  fields.  Those 
which  cannot  be  adequately  fertilized  or  are  poor  to  begin  with  are 
left  fallow  every  other  season.  Often  entire  hillsides  are  planted  in  a 
single  crop  and  are  rotated  in  the  same  sequence,  a  result  of  informal 
consultation  among  the  various  people  who  own  the  many  plots  in- 
volved. Crop  rotation  is  practiced  in  most  Pahari  areas  but  in  differ- 
ent patterns  (cf.  Stowell,  1907,  p.  11;  Walton,  1910,  pp.  26  ff.;  1911a, 
p.  55;  Pant,  1935,  pp.  136  ff.). 

Few  fields  can  be  irrigated  in  this  terrain.  Stowell  reported  in  1907 
(p.  9)  that  only  3  per  cent  of  all  cultivated  land  in  Garhwal  was  irri- 
gated, and  8  per  cent  in  Almora.  Only  three  of  the  205  acres  within 
Sirkanda's  boundaries  are  irrigated,  plus  25  to  30  of  the  93  acres  which 
lie  outside  of  Sirkanda  and  are  owned  by  Sirkanda  people.  These  25 
to  30  irrigated  acres  are  nearly  all  low,  flat  lands  bordering  the  valley. 


48  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

Irrigation  of  fields  in  these  hills  is  an  engineering  feat  of  consider- 
able complexity.  Water  is  obtained  from  streams  or  springs  which  are 
blocked  with  stone  dams  at  distances  varying  from  a  few  hundred 
yards  to  more  than  a  mile  upstream  from  the  fields  to  be  watered.  From 
the  dams  narrow  channels  are  constructed  following  the  contour  of 
the  land  at  sufficient  gradient  to  keep  a  steady  flow  of  water.  Where 
these  canals  skirt  bare  rock  cliffs  or  bridge  small  ravines,  they  are 
made  of  wood  lined  with  clay  and  are  held  in  place  by  wooden  or 
stone  supports  wedged  in  crevices.  The  canals  empty  into  the  highest 
of  the  fields  to  be  irrigated,  and  outlets  are  so  arranged  as  to  provide 
maximum  subsequent  use  of  the  water  in  lower  fields.  Irrigation  canals 
are  built  and  maintained  cooperatively  by  those  who  use  them — usually 
high-caste  people  of  a  single  village. 

The  nature  and  extent  of  cultivation  of  some  crops  is  limited  by 
the  type  of  land  available;  that  is,  irrigated  lands  are  necessary  for 
wet  rice;  shady,  loamy  lands  are  required  for  potatoes.  Another  im- 
portant factor  is  animal  molestation.  Corn  is  grown  only  in  small 
quantities  and  in  fields  adjacent  to  the  village  because  bears  and  por- 
cupines destroy  more  distant  stands.  Potatoes  are  grown  only  in  the 
vicinity  of  chans  in  most  areas  because  wild  pigs  destroy  unsupervised 
fields.  Monkeys  menace  several  crops.  No  specific  measures  are  taken 
to  ward  off  these  pests  other  than  to  plant  their  favorite  crops  where 
they  are  unlikely  to  come  and,  occasionally,  to  build  a  shelter  near  a 
field  where  someone  can  stay  or  a  dog  can  be  tied  to  scare  off  the 
marauders.  Persistent  animal  pests  may  be  ambushed  and  shot. 

Thus  far  only  the  "practical"  means  by  which  agriculture  is  car- 
ried out  and  good  crops  are  ensured  have  been  discussed.  To  enhance 
success  there  are  also  supernatural  means,  ranging  from  an  annual 
ceremony  to  deities  who  influence  crops  and  weather  (described  in 
Appendix  IB)  to  beliefs  as  to  the  appropriate  day  of  the  week  for  be- 
ginning planting  and  harvest.  Ceremonials  and  beliefs  of  this  nature 
are  not  extensive  and  seem  to  be  of  decreasing  importance,  perhaps 
reflecting  the  relatively  reliable  and  adequate  nature  of  Pahari  agri- 
culture. Difficulties  with  crops  are  usually  treated,  as  are  illness,  finan- 
cial reversal,  or  other  adversities,  as  manifestations  of  the  displeasure 
of  specific  household  or  village  deities.  These  matters  will  be  discussed 
in  the  following  chapter. 

Cash  Crops 

Growing  crops  primarily  for  sale  is  a  relatively  recent  innovation 
in  the  village.  The  most  important  such  crop  now  is  potatoes.  Several 
varieties  with  different  growing  seasons  are  cultivated,  so  that  some  are 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  49 

in  the  ground  at  almost  any  time  of  year.  Potatoes  are  grown  in  chan 
locations  north  of  Sirkanda  and  usually  above  it  in  altitude.  Less  than 
half  of  the  villagers  own  land  suitable  for  this  crop. 

Other  cash  crops  grown  on  Sirkanda-owned  lands  include  ginger, 
onions,  garlic,  koreander,  and  the  surpluses  of  wheat,  rice,  and  taro. 

Preparation  and  Consumption  of  Food 

Year-around  daily  staples  eaten  in  Sirkanda  are  the  millets  jang- 
hora  and  khoda  (mandua).  Wheat  and  barley  are  often  mixed  with  the 
latter  variety  of  millet.  In  addition,  dal  (pulses)  and  vegetables,  pri- 
marily taro  and  potatoes,  are  eaten  regularly. 

Grain  must,  of  course,  be  milled  before  use.  Normally  milling  is 
done  at  intervals  after  harvest  so  that  an  adequate  supply  is  on  hand 
for  use,  but  at  any  one  time  most  of  the  stored  grain  is  unmilled.  Two 
water-powered  mills  are  patronized,  payment  in  flour  being  made  to 
their  owners  at  each  milling.  The  mills  are  four  and  five  miles  distant 
in  opposite  directions,  the  farther  and  more  patronized  being  en  route 
to  points  in  the  valley  and  owned  by  a  member  of  a  Sirkanda  Rajput 
household.  In  addition,  some  families  have  small  stone  hand  mills 
which  are  used  occasionally.  The  daily  supply  of  rice  and  janghora 
is  husked  each  morning  in  a  stone  mortar  with  a  long  wooden  pestle. 
There  are  several  community  mortars  in  convenient  locations  around 
the  village  and  individual  ones  at  several  houses.  Pounding  in  them 
is  regular  early-morning  women's  work. 

Cooking  is  done  by  women  in  an  inner  room  of  the  house,  over  a 
small  wood  fire  in  an  open,  dung-plastered  stone  fireplace.  Brass  and 
iron  utensils  are  utilized  as  in  the  plains,  and  the  style  of  cooking  is 
similar  to  that  in  the  plains. 

Two  large  meals  and  one  or  two  small  ones  are  prepared  daily. 
At  6:30  or  7:00  a.m.,  about  an  hour  after  rising,  there  is  a  light  meal 
consisting  of  leftover  chapaties  (unleavened  bread)  eaten  with  salt  and 
chilis  or  milk  or  one  of  several  milk  products.  Between  10:30  a.m. 
and  noon  a  large  meal  is  prepared  consisting  of  janghora  boiled  in 
water  and  served  with  boiled  dal.  Boiled  vegetables  (potatoes,  taro, 
pumpkin),  and  occasionally  curds,  may  also  be  served.  At  4:00  to 
7:00  p.m.  another  light  meal  may  be  served,  consisting  of  leftovers  from 
the  noon  or  previous  evening's  meal.  This  meal  is  sometimes  omitted. 
Between  8:00  and  10:00  p.m.,  one  to  two  hours  before  retiring,  another 
complete  meal  is  prepared.  This  consists  of  chapaties  made  of  khoda, 
often  mixed  with  wheat  or  barley,  and  a  vegetable  mixture,  usually  of 
potatoes  or  taro  cooked  with  spices  and  chilis.  Water  and  rarely  milk 
or  buttermilk  are  drunk  after  each  meal.  This  fare  is  considered  very 


gO  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

plain  and  inferior  to  that  which  is  served  guests,  in  which  the  chapaties 
are  made  of  wheat,  rice  is  substituted  for  janghora,  and  milk,  ghee 
(clarified  butter),  and  other  fancier  foods  are  served.  Paharis  are  self- 
conscious  about  their  food  before  outsiders  and  frequently  make  depre- 
catory remarks  about  the  poverty  of  Paharis  and  Pahari  food.  "Jang- 
hora is  Pahari  basmati  [the  finest  grade  of  rice],"  is  a  frequent  wry 
comment  in  Sirkanda. 

When  guests  are  present  tea  is  served  regardless  of  time  of  day, 
though  it  is  rarely  used  otherwise.  Ceremonial  feasts  are  elaborations 
of  the  daily  fare  with  a  variety  of  pulses,  ghee,  curds,  vegetables,  pickles, 
sweetened  rice,  and  halwa  (a  sweet  dish)  generally  added  to  it.  In 
any  case  the  food  is  almost  exclusively  of  locally  grown  products,  so 
that  cash  expenditures  on  food  are  minimal. 

Animal  Husbandry 

Second  to  crops  in  the  economy  of  Sirkanda  is  livestock.  A  man's 
first  investment  after  land  is  in  livestock.  Most  important  of  his  animals 
are  his  bullocks  or  oxen  which  pull  the  plow.  The  usual  way  to  desig- 
nate how  much  land  a  man  owns  is  by  how  many  oxen  he  uses  to  till  it. 
In  Sirkanda  there  are  twenty-five  "two-bullock"  (one-plow)  house- 
holds, twelve  "four-bullock"  households,  three  "six-bullock"  house- 
holds, and  one  "eight-bullock"  household.  A  total  of  124  bullocks 
are  owned  by  41  households — a  sizable  investment  in  view  of  the 
fact  that  a  good  pair  of  oxen  are  worth  250  to  350  rupees.  No  family 
owns  more  oxen  than  it  uses,  and  any  that  are  not  in  good  condition 
are  quickly  sold. 

Almost  equally  important  are  cows  and  buffaloes.  These  are  kept 
for  their  two  valuable  products,  milk  and  manure.  Animal  manure  is 
considered  necessary  for  agriculture  and  is  often  sufficient  reason  for 
keeping  an  animal.  Milk  is  a  cash  product.  Most  of  it  is  sold  to  shop- 
keepers in  the  form  of  milk,  butter,  ghee  (clarified  butter),  or  a  boiled- 
down  solid  product  used  in  the  making  of  sweets.  Relatively  small 
amounts  are  used  in  the  village. 

Most  cows  and  many  buffaloes  are  kept  at  chans  and  are  moved 
seasonally  from  low  altitudes  in  winter  to  higher  altitudes  in  summer. 
This  protects  them  from  climatic  extremes.  It  also  gives  them  an 
optimal  diet,  and  brings  them  close  to  the  milk  markets  of  Dehra 
Dun  or  smaller,  closer  markets  in  the  valley  during  the  winter,  and 
to  Mussoorie  (with  its  big  milk  trade  during  the  vacation  season)  or 
closer  hill  markets  in  the  summer.  Sirkanda  villagers  own  about  725 
cows  worth  Rs.  70  to  150  each,  and  140  buffaloes  worth  Rs.  250  to 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  51 

400  each.  Buffaloes  are  more  valuable  as  milk  producers  than  cows, 
but  are  harder  to  care  for  since  they  are  too  heavy  and  awkward  to  be 
allowed  out  to  pasture  or  to  get  water  in  this  rugged  terrain. 

In  the  markets  buffalo  milk  is  generally  preferred  to  that  of  cows, 
but  in  the  village  cow's  milk  is  often  preferred.  It  is  admitted  that 
buffalo  milk  is  "better  for  the  body"  and  makes  men  virile  (any  ap- 
preciative wife  or  lover  will  feed  her  man  buffalo  milk  and  its  products 
frequently),  but  it  does  not  help  the  brain.  One  villager  commented 
that,  "If  you  drink  too  much  buffalo  milk  you  will  get  buffalo  wis- 
dom," that  is,  stupidity.  The  difference  in  quality  of  milk  from  these 
two  sources  is  locally  ascribed  to  diet — a  cow  has  a  more  varied  diet 
since  it  grazes  for  itself,  and  therefore  its  milk  is  superior.  On  the  same 
basis  goat's  milk,  though  it  is  not  used  (see  below),  is  better  than  that  of 
cows,  and  woman's  milk  is  best  of  all. 

Buffaloes  are  occasionally  killed  as  offerings  to  gods  in  Bhatbair. 
Their  flesh  is  said  to  be  eaten  only  by  people  of  the  shoemaker  caste, 
but  there  is  some  evidence  that  others,  even  in  Sirkanda,  may  occa- 
sionally eat  buffalo  meat.  The  sanctity  of  cows  is  as  strongly  felt  in 
the  hills  as  in  the  plains,  and  they  are  never  killed  nor  is  their  meat 
eaten. 

About  350  goats  and  10  sheep  are  kept  by  a  total  of  24  families  in 
Sirkanda.  They  are  raised  primarily  for  sale  in  the  markets,  where  they 
bring  Rs.  15  to  30  each.  In  a  year  10  to  20  goats  may  be  sold  by  a 
single  household.  In  addition,  their  manure  is  considered  more  valu- 
able as  fertilizer  than  that  of  other  animals.  Their  flesh  is  eaten  in 
the  village — usually  after  they  have  been  used  as  religious  sacrifices. 
In  the  entire  village  not  over  20  or  30  goats  are  used  yearly  for  sacrifice. 
Occasionally  a  goat  is  killed  solely  for  eating,  but  this  fact  is  not 
readily  admitted.  Villagers  imply  that  a  sacrifice  may  sometimes  be  an 
excuse  to  eat  meat,  but  in  no  case  is  meat  eaten  as  part  of  a  regular 
meal.  Instead,  it  is  treated  as  a  special  feast  and  is  generally  consumed 
with  liquor.  Goat's  milk  is  not  used.  The  proffered  explanation  for 
this  is  that  one  cannot  take  the  milk  of  an  animal  whose  flesh  he  eats, 
nor  vice  versa,  because  an  animal  that  gives  milk  is  in  some  respects 
like  a  mother.  This  is  also  a  reason  for  not  eating  buffalo  meat. 

Horses  and  mules  are  used  as  beasts  of  burden  and  for  human 
transportation.  There  are  now  15  horses  and  two  mules  in  the  village, 
owned  by  16  of  the  larger  high-caste  households  and  representing  an 
investment  of  Rs.  200  to  1,000  each.  They  are  a  relatively  recent  in- 
novation in  the  village;  previously  all  loads  were  carried  by  the  men 
and  women  of  the  village. 

It  is  worth  noting  that  livestock,  like  land,  is  predominantly  high- 


£2  THE   ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

caste  property.  The  10  per  cent  of  the  population  that  is  of  low  caste 
owns  2  per  cent  of  the  cattle,  5  per  cent  of  the  bullocks,  6  per  cent 
of  the  buffaloes,  and  8  per  cent  of  the  goats.  They,  more  than  many  of 
the  high-caste  families,  find  it  worthwhile  to  supplement  their  income 
by  goat  breeding,  because  they  need  the  money  and  have  the  time  to 
devote  to  this  activity.  They  own  no  horses  or  mules. 

Other  Economic  Activities 

No  animal  fodder  as  such  is  grown  by  villagers.  The  straw  of 
grains  is  often  kept  for  use  when  other  fodder  gets  scarce,  but  the 
major  dependence  is  upon  wild  grasses  and  leaves  collected  daily  the 
year  around,  green  or  dry  as  the  season  permits.  This  is  a  major  oc- 
cupation for  women  of  the  village.  In  addition,  all  animals  except 
buffaloes  are  pastured  daily,  and  all  of  these  except  horses  and  mules 
are  attended  at  all  times.  No  one  goes  to  the  forests  to  shepherd  animals 
without  bringing  in  a  headload  of  fodder  or  firewood.  In  the  months 
of  May  and  June  grass  fires  are  lit  by  villagers  in  order  to  burn  over 
the  hillsides  and  ensure  a  superior  grass  crop  after  the  rains.  These 
fires — the  bane  of  the  government  forestry  officers — dot  the  hills  during 
this  season.  Often,  and  not  surprisingly,  they  leave  burned  chans,  and 
occasionally  dead  livestock,  in  their  wake. 

For  two  or  three  months  before  the  rains  the  year-round  activity  of 
wood  collecting  is  intensified  in  order  to  prepare  a  stockpile  of  dry 
fuel  for  the  rainy  season.  It  is  the  availability  of  wood  for  fuel  which 
makes  possible  the  extensive  manuring  of  fields,  in  contrast  to  the 
plains  custom  and  necessity  of  utilizing  all  manure  for  fuel. 

Housebuilding  and  repair  are  winter  and  summer  activities.  Con- 
siderable frantic  roof  repair  takes  place  after  the  rains  begin,  revealing 
its  need.  Agricultural  terraces  and  stone  fences  are  built  and  repaired 
when  the  need  arises  and  when  other  work  permits,  especially  before 
and  after  the  rains,  which  do  considerable  damage  to  terraced  fields 
and  retaining  walls. 

The  agricultural  slack  season  comes  in  December  and  January,  when 
only  daily  routine  work  and  building  has  to  be  done.  During  this  time 
men  engage  in  minor  activities  such  as  rope-making  and  repairing 
equipment  and  houses,  and  the  whole  family  contributes  to  yarn- 
making,  knitting,  and  the  like  in  idle  moments.  Somewhat  the  same 
situation  exists  in  the  midst  of  the  rains. 

Beekeeping  is  an  incidental  enterprise  conducted  by  many  house- 
holds in  the  village  and  in  chans.  A  small  hole  on  the  outside  wall  of  a 
house  leads  to  a  cubical  space  about  a  foot  square  in  the  wall  with  a 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  53 

removable  board  at  the  back  of  the  space,  inside  the  house.  Wild  bees 
nest  in  this  space.  Twice  a  year  (in  April  and  October)  the  bees  are 
smoked  out  and  the  honey  is  removed  and  sold  in  the  markets.  Hunting 
and  gathering  play  a  very  small  part  in  the  Sirkanda  economy.  Although 
most  high-caste  households  own  guns,  they  are  used  primarily  to 
frighten  or  kill  marauding  animals.  Occasionally  native  wild  chickens, 
partridges,  wild  pigs,  wild  goats,  or  deer  are  shot  for  meat.  If  a  freshly 
killed  prey  of  some  carnivorous  animal  is  found  it  is  eaten  by  villagers, 
though  they  admit  it  reluctantly  if  at  all.  Fish  are  obtained  from  the 
rivers  by  low-caste  people  of  villages  near  the  rivers  who  net  them  to 
sell,  or  by  young  men  of  Sirkanda  who  make  a  picnic  excursion  of  the 
fishing  and  a  party  of  the  ensuing  feast.  In  late  summer  several  varieties 
of  wild  berries  and  wild  apricots  and  peaches  may  be  collected.  Except 
for  the  apricots,  which  are  sold  in  urban  markets,  there  is  relatively 
little  enthusiasm  for  these  products. 

Production  and  Income 

Crops  and  livestock  provide  the  high  castes  with  most  of  their 
livelihood.  Estimated  annual  crop  yields  were  obtained  in  detail  for 
20  (just  over  half)  of  the  high-caste  households.  The  estimates  indicated 
that  almost  150  per  cent  of  the  household's  annual  grain  needs  were 
produced  in  the  fields  during  a  good  year.  An  average  household 
(eight  or  nine  persons)  consumes  about  50  to  60  maunds  (4,000  to 
4,800  pounds)  of  grain  per  year  and  produces  75  to  90  maunds.4  Each 
harvest  is  customarily  stored  and  used  throughout  the  year  for  sub- 
sistence and  for  payments  to  artisans  and  priests.  The  surplus  is  sold 
only  when  the  succeeding  harvest  is  in.  Sale  of  surplus  grain  and  cash 
crops  together  were  reported  to  yield  about  Rs.  600  in  a  good  year  for 
a  nine-member  family.  This  would  amount  to  around  Rs.  20,000  for 
the  whole  village. 

The  main  source  of  cash  and  credit  is  dairy  products.  Estimates  of 
milk  production  and  sale  in  39  households  indicated  an  annual  cash 
income  of  around  Rs.  800  per  family  from  this  source.  Total  yearly 
cash  expenditures  for  a  nine-member  family  were  roughly  calculated  at 
Rs.  i,ooo.5  Thus  total  income  was  estimated  to  exceed  total  expenditure 
by  an  average  of  Rs.  400  (equal  to  about  27  maunds  of  grain)  per  fam- 
ily per  year  among  land-  and  cattle-owning  families.  The  estimates  are 
extremely  rough,  and  it  seems  probable  that  both  income  and  expen- 
ditures are  exaggerated.  Moreover,  the  sample  is  slightly  biased  in  favor 
of  the  more  prosperous  joint  families.  The  estimates  indicate  relative 
orders  of  magnitude  rather  than  precise  quantities.  There  is  a  range, 
with  some  families  exceeding  the  average  and  others  falling  well  below 


54  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

it.  Some  years  bring  larger  or  smaller  than  average  crops,  greater  or 
smaller  expenditures,  on  family  and  village  levels.  Some  families  spend 
more  than  the  average  on  ceremonies  and  other  approved  means  of 
conspicuous  consumption,  while  others  economize.  There  are  significant 
caste  differences,  with  the  service  castes  having  considerably  less  to  live 
on  than  the  landowning  castes.  Low-caste  incomes  are  discussed  below 
under  the  description  of  their  occupational  specialties.  These  figures 
do  serve  to  suggest,  however,  the  relative  prosperity  of  this  village  com- 
pared to  many  Indian  villages.  Moreover,  they  check  with  separate  in- 
quiries, such  as  that  into  the  village  accountant's  official  estimates  of 
crop  yields  per  acre  multiplied  by  acreage  planted. 

Only  one  "famine"  year  is  recalled  by  Sirkanda  residents,  and  it 
occurred  some  fifteen  years  previous  to  the  research.  Crops  were  in- 
sufficient to  meet  food  requirements  that  year,  and  a  number  of  families 
had  to  go  to  Dehra  Dun  to  buy  grain.  The  significant  fact  is  that  they 
were  able  to  buy  it;  no  one  went  hungry,  and  no  one  went  deeply  in 
debt. 

It  is  apparent  that  some  families  will  accumulate  wealth  under  these 
conditions.  In  Sirkanda,  when  income  exceeds  that  which  is  necessary 
for  family  welfare  and  livelihood,  a  man  first  sees  to  his  lands  and  then 
to  his  livestock.  If  these  are  sufficient  he  is  most  likely  to  use  his  money 
for  house-  or  chan-building.  If  these  too  are  sufficient  he  may  buy 
household  utensils  and  jewelry.  Beyond  this,  with  the  simple  needs  of 
life  in  the  hills  met,  extra  money  is  stored  in  concealment  or  part  of  it 
is  loaned  on  interest  (15  to  25  per  cent)  to  other  villagers  or  reliable 
acquaintances.  Money  is  never  kept  in  banks.  At  least  six  Sirkanda 
families  regularly  or  occasionally  lend  money.  These  include  the  three 
families  who  retain  their  original  undivided  lands  and  three  others 
with  higher  than  average  land-to-person  ratios.  The  wealthiest  man  of 
the  group  is  variously  estimated  to  have  Rs.  8,000  to  Rs.  50,000,  the  latter 
doubtless  a  greatly  exaggerated  estimate.  Borrowing  is  done  to  finance 
such  major  outlays  as  marriage  (which  averages  from  Rs.  2,000  to 
3,000  for  a  son  and,  depending  upon  the  type  of  marriage,  from  nothing 
to  Rs.  1,500  for  a  daughter);  house  construction  (which  ranges  from 
Rs.  2,000  to  4,000);  purchase  of  animals,  purchase  of  land,  costs  of  legal 
cases.  Several  Sirkanda  families  have  been  chronically  in  debt  from 
such  expenditures  in  recent  years,  but  the  relative  wealth  of  families 
shifts  with  time.  Thus,  of  the  four  wealthiest  families  in  the  village, 
two  have  become  so  recently — one  in  the  generation  just  past,  the  other 
since  Independence.  Both  of  the  others  have  increased  their  wealth 
during  the  past  generation.  Several  other  families  are  said  to  be  less 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  55 

well  off  than  in  previous  generations.  This  type  of  shift  has  in  all  cases 
but  one  been  linked  with  a  change  in  the  man-land  ratio.  The  more 
land  per  man,  up  to  a  point,  the  more  wealth  is  accrued.  With  too  little 
manpower,  even  land  is  useless,  and  in  one  of  these  cases  wealth  came 
when  a  man  finally  acquired  a  son  and  a  servant  to  help  him  work  his 
more  than  ample  lands.  In  one  case  sudden  wealth  came  from  an  un- 
expected windfall  in  the  form  of  money  acquired  by  questionable 
means  from  fleeing  Muslims  at  the  time  of  the  partition  of  India  and 
Pakistan. 

There  are  few  people  in  or  out  of  the  hills  who  will  not  attest  to  the 
poverty  of  Paharis.  As  applied  to  Sirkanda  and  neighboring  villages 
this  stereotype  is  a  fiction,  based  largely  upon  the  simple  material  pos- 
sessions and  hard  work  that  characterize  Pahari  life.  While  it  is  true 
that  by  plains  standards  Paharis  do  not  acquire  great  wealth  and  that 
what  wealth  they  do  acquire  is  not  displayed,  it  is  also  true  that  they  do 
not  live  the  marginal  existence  led  by  many  of  their  plains  brethren,  nor 
have  they  faced  periodic  famines  and  droughts  as  have  people  of  Bihar 
and  Bengal. 

Trade  and  Markets 

Neither  Sirkanda  nor  the  interdependent  and  relatively  isolated 
group  of  villages  which  make  up  Bhatbair  and  the  adjacent  area  in 
Tehri  Garhwal  are  entirely  self-sufficient.  They  are  and  perhaps  always 
have  been  dependent  upon  larger  centers.  This  relationship  is  an  im- 
portant prerequisite  for  classifying  these  Pahari  villages  as  an  example 
of  peasant  society.  A  peasant  society  is  one  composed  primarily  of 
people  who  make  their  living  by  agriculture  and  who  live  in  symbiotic 
interdependence  with  market  towns  or  urban  areas  though  living  away 
from  them  (cf.  Kroeber,  1948,  p.  284;  Redfield,  1957,  pp.  31  ff.). 

The  peasant  has  some  product  which  the  city  consumes,  and  there  are  products 
of  the  city — metal  tools,  guns,  patent  medicines,  or  electric  flashlights — 
which  the  peasant  takes  from  the  manufacturers  in  the  city.  Since  the  coming 
of  money  into  the  world,  the  peasant  village  has  come  in  great  degree  to  define 
its  economic  affairs  in  terms  of  this  measure.  (Redfield,  1957,  pp.  31  f.) 

Having  been  included  in  the  "economic  nexus  of  civilized  society,"  the 
peasant  is  imbued  with  "a  spirit  of  pecuniary  advantage"  (ibid.). 

The  dependence  of  Sirkanda  peasants  on  urban  centers  is  increasing. 
Sixty  years  ago  one  trip  per  year  to  a  major  market  sufficed  to  exchange 
the  agricultural  surplus  directly  or  indirectly  for  major  items  not 
locally  available,  and  to  transact  necessary  business  with  official  agents 


56  THE   ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

of  authority.  Several  trips  to  intermediary  markets  and  occasional 
visits  from  peddlers  provided  those  items  needing  more  frequent  re- 
plenishment, such  as  salt,  sugar,  and  glass  bangles.  As  transportation 
has  improved,  urban  areas  such  as  Dehra  Dun  have  increased  their 
direct  influence  on  the  village.  Some  men  go  every  month,  and  most 
go  several  times  a  year.  Those  living  in  chans  may  go  weekly  or  oftener 
because  they  are  close  to  town  and  have  milk  products  to  sell.  Inter- 
mediary markets  are  visited  with  proportionately  increased  frequency. 
The  range  of  products  sought  and  of  agencies  providing  them  has 
increased  in  the  area  as  money  has  become  more  readily  available. 
Milk  and  agricultural  surpluses  are  sold  to  get  money  to  buy  an  in- 
creasing array  of  goods,  to  pay  taxes  and  court  costs,  and  even  to  pay 
village  artisans. 

Reliance  upon  products  and  services  deriving  from  urban  areas  is 
therefore  a  traditional  feature  of  the  Sirkanda  economy  which  is  be- 
coming more  prominent.  Today  the  urban  economy  reaches  into  the 
village  in  many  ways. 

There  are  two  shops  in  Sirkanda.  One  is  owned  and  operated  by  a 
large  household  of  Rajputs  in  Sirkanda.  It  sells  mostly  staples  such  as 
cigarettes,  matches,  kerosene,  cooking  oil,  sugar,  salt,  spices,  and  tea  to 
villagers,  and  hot  tea  to  passing  travelers,  on  a  cash  basis.  The  other  is 
operated  by  a  merchant  from  Rajpur,  who  was  asked  to  come  by  a  group 
of  villagers  who  did  not  want  to  trade  in  the  other  shop  because  of 
personal  rivalries.  He  has  run  this  shop  for  some  25  years.6  His  trade 
includes  selling  staples,  often  on  credit,  but  his  main  business  is  buying 
some  of  the  villagers'  produce,  notably  the  solidified  milk  product, 
pumpkins,  apricots,  lemons,  and  anything  else  he  can  resell  in  Dehra 
Dun  at  a  profit. 

Lower  prices  and  greater  selection  encourage  villagers  to  buy  at 
larger  centers  except  in  emergencies.  Likewise,  they  can  sell  their 
produce  to  greater  advantage  in  market  towns.  Dehra  Dun  and  Mus- 
soorie  are  the  large  trading  centers,  but  smaller,  closer  ones  are  fre- 
quently patronized.  Suakholi,  ten  miles  from  Sirkanda  and  six  from 
Mussoorie  on  the  Mussoorie-Tehri  trail,  is  much  used  by  hillmen 
throughout  this  area.  Similarly  Sahas  Dhara,  Nagal,  and  Rajpur  are 
traditional  markets  below  Sirkanda,  five  to  nine  miles  away.  Supplies 
for  such  special  occasions  as  marriage,  and  items  not  produced  locally, 
such  as  salt,  sugar,  oil,  jewelry,  trinkets,  cloth,  utensils,  and  some  tools, 
are  often  obtained  from  these  places.  In  each  market  are  particular 
merchants  with  whom  Sirkanda  farmers  regularly  trade.  The  relation- 
ship becomes  somewhat  personal,  so  that  villagers  may  stay  overnight 
in  the  trader's  shop  when  they  visit  town  even  if  they  have  no  business 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  57 

to  transact  with  the  shopkeeper.  The  shopkeeper  may  also  serve  as  an 
informal  adviser  on  matters  unfamiliar  to  the  villagers. 

Itinerant  peddlers  come  through  Sirkanda  selling  bangles  and  other 
small  items  of  decoration  and  convenience  two  or  three  times  a  year. 
One  who  came  and  stayed  three  days  while  I  was  in  the  village  sold 
trinkets  worth  seven  maunds  (560  pounds)  of  grain,  for  a  gross  of  about 
Rs.  100  and  a  profit  of  at  least  Rs.  70,  in  Sirkanda  alone.  Even  with  an 
extra  rented  mule,  he  had  to  make  a  return  trip  to  carry  off  his  pro- 
ceeds. Interestingly  enough,  he  arrived  shortly  after  the  annual  fair 
at  which  the  people  had  already  spent  a  good  deal  of  money,  much  of  it 
on  items  which  this  very  peddler  had  been  selling  at  the  fair. 

The  annual  fair  (taulu)  of  Bhatbair  is  held  a  few  miles  from  Sirkanda 
and  is  by  far  the  most  important  event  of  its  kind  for  the  residents  of 
Bhatbair,  but  it  is  too  provincial  to  attract  outsiders  other  than  two  or 
three  merchants.  Other  fairs  attended  by  Sirkanda  villagers  are  those 
held  annually  at  Rajpur,  Mussoorie,  and  at  a  well-known  temple  on 
the  Mussoorie-Tehri  trail.  At  all  of  these  there  is  ample  opportunity 
to  spend  money  on  tea,  refreshments,  sweets,  trinkets,  entertainment, 
liquor,  and  women.  A  number  of  Sirkanda  villagers  set  up  concessions 
at  the  annual  Bhatbair  fair,  but  aside  from  the  Ferris  wheel  operated 
by  Bajgis  of  Sirkanda  and  a  nearby  village,  these  rarely  show  much  of  a 
profit.  The  profiteers  are  the  two  or  three  outside  merchants  who  sell 
trinkets,  the  clandestine  sellers  of  liquor,  and  perhaps  some  of  those 
who  sell  sweets,  which  are  the  medium  of  exchange  for  obtaining  sexual 
favors  from  women,  one  of  the  major  activities  of  this  fair.  The  in- 
experience of  the  amateur  village  entrepreneurs  who  set  up  booths  at 
this  fair  generally  dooms  them  to  financial  failure.  They  join  the  spirit 
and  activities  of  the  festival  and  forget  to  collect  cash  for  their  wares 
or  are  distracted  from  their  shop-tending  by  other  activities,  while 
their  stores  are  good-naturedly  depleted. 

The  Jajmani  System 

A  number  of  essential  activities  in  the  village,  especially  those 
requiring  particular  skills  or  knowledge,  are  performed  by  specialists. 
Most  of  these  occupations  are  thought  of  as  caste  monopolies,  and  the 
arrangements  for  work  and  payment  are  standardized  in  some  form  of 
traditional  exchange,  known  widely  in  North  India  as  the  jajmani 
system  (cf.  W.  H.  Wiser,  1936;  Beidelman,  1959;  Berreman,  1962b,  in 
which  part  of  the  following  has  appeared). 

When  Sirkanda  villagers  use  the  term  jajman  they  refer  to  one  kind 
of  exchange:  that  of  the  Brahmin's  ritual  services  to  his  clients  (jajmans) 
in  exchange  for  traditional  "gifts"  paid  in  grain  or  other  goods.  This 


^8  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

is  in  accordance  with  widespread  usage  of  the  term  among  villagers  in 
North  India  and  with  its  etymological  meaning:  one  who  asks  another 
to  perform  worship  and  offers  a  gift  to  him  in  return. 

Sirkanda  villagers  also  understand,  though  they  do  not  themselves 
normally  use,  the  term  jajman  to  refer  to  the  traditional  arrangement 
whereby  an  artisan  serves  the  needs  of  an  agriculturist  in  his  specialty. 
In  this  relationship  the  artisan  or  service  caste  member  is  paid  a  fixed 
portion  of  grain  at  each  harvest,  the  amount  depending  upon  the  size 
of  the  household  or  landholding  of  the  agriculturist  and  the  type  of 
service  performed. 

The  Pahari  term  which  Sirkanda  villagers  normally  use  in  reference 
to  an  artisan's  clients,  parallel  to  their  use  of  "jajman"  in  reference  to 
a  Brahmin's  clients,  is  gaikh,  one  who  purchases  the  service  of  another. 
Ideally  the  relationship  between  artisan  and  gaikh  is  a  permanent  one 
with  standard  traditional  payments,  but  in  practice  there  is  a  good  deal 
of  shifting,  especially  where  there  is  more  than  one  local  artisan  avail- 
able. 

A  third  kind  of  traditional  economic  exchange  in  the  village  is  that 
of  service  among  artisans.  This  is  not  usually  included  in  either  the 
term  "jajman"  or  "gaikh"  by  villagers.  Blacksmiths,  for  example,  see  to 
the  ironwork  needs  of  the  local  drummers,  who  in  return  drum  for  the 
blacksmiths  as  needed.  Agreements  to  this  sort  of  exchange  are  about 
as  stable  as  those  in  the  gaikh  arrangement. 

Finally,  many  services  are  performed,  and  have  been  traditionally 
performed,  on  a  piecework  or  daily  wage  basis,  with  cash  or  grain  used 
for  payment.  These  include  the  sporadic  services  of  ceremonial  cooks, 
stonemasons,  wood  turners,  and  others,  who  are  not  resident  in  or  near 
most  villages,  as  are  blacksmiths  and  drummers.  They  include  also  the 
nontraditional  or  non-caste-specific  activities  performed  by  local  ar- 
tisans. Tailoring  and  basketmaking,  for  example,  are  in  this  village 
done  by  drummers.  Payment  for  these  services  is  on  a  piecework  basis. 

Any  low-caste  person  may  be  called  upon  to  help  a  high-caste  villager 
in  emergency  jobs  or  in  tasks  which  the  high-caste  person  is  unable  or 
unwilling  to  do  himself.  Most  often  the  high-caste  person  calls  upon 
one  of  the  artisans  who  serve  him,  that  is,  for  whom  he  is  a  client.  The 
low-caste  person  cannot  refuse  to  help  without  a  good  reason  such  as 
physical  incapacity  or  an  urgent  prior  commitment  to  another  client. 
Otherwise  he  risks  economic  or  physical  sanctions.  This  is  not  the  case 
with  either  Brahmin-jajman  relations  or  intraservice  caste  relations. 

Although  each  caste  in  and  around  Sirkanda  is  identified  with  a  par- 
ticular occupational  role,  there  is  considerable  flexibility  in  the  system. 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  59 

Important  in  the  jajmani  or  gaikh  system  is  the  fact  that  service  castes, 
unlike  Brahmins,  have  a  difficult  time  maintaining  a  monopoly  on  their 
services  and  often  have  no  other  reliable  source  of  income  such  as 
farming.  The  traditional  occupation  of  each  caste  may  remain  caste- 
specific,  but  its  members'  livelihood  may  depend  largely  or  entirely  on 
specialties  which  are  not  restricted  to  a  single  caste.  Under  conditions 
of  necessity  or  even  convenience,  many  occupations  are  interchange- 
able among  low  castes.  Occasionally  a  high-caste  person  will  perform  an 
artisan's  work.  Therefore,  if  an  artisan  quits  working  for  a  client  there 
are  others,  even  outside  his  caste,  who  can  and  will  take  his  place. 

Another  feature  of  significance  in  economic  organization  is  the  ab- 
solutely small  number  of  individuals  who  make  up  each  local  artisan 
caste  group,  often  only  one  nuclear  family  or  two  closely  related  and 
recently  separated  families.  Probably  partly  as  a  result  of  this  fact  the 
artisan  castes  are  not  very  cohesive  groups.  Unlike  the  high  castes,  they 
have  little  or  nothing  in  the  way  of  group  organization  and  discipline 
beyond  local  kin-connected  groups.  Moreover,  in  many  areas,  as  popu- 
lation has  increased,  so  has  access  to  bazaar-made  goods.  Agriculturists 
have  become  less  dependent  upon  artisans'  services  and  less  inclined 
to  make  full  payment  to  them.  There  is  increasing  competition  among 
artisans  for  a  decreasingly  remunerative  clientele.  As  a  result  there  is 
considerable  friction  among  them.  In  Sirkanda  the  local  blacksmith 
and  drummer  castes  are  both  divided  within  themselves  between  two 
competing  and  often  hostile  brothers,  neither  able  to  make  an  adequate 
living  at  his  traditional  occupation  and  therefore  supplementing  it  by 
brewing  illicit  liquor,  raising  goats,  practicing  medicine  and  divination, 
tailoring,  or  carrying  on  agriculture  if  he  has  land.  Thus  gaikh  rela- 
tionships are  unstable,  with  much  jockeying  for  the  better-paying  cli- 
ents on  the  one  hand,  and  for  the  better-performing  artisans  on  the 
other.  The  effect  of  this  situation  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  only  among 
service  castes  do  brothers  frequently  dissolve  the  joint  family  and  di- 
vide the  common  patrimony. 

Exploitation  in  the  sense  of  arbitrary  and  self-seeking  control  over 
the  behavior  of  others  is  characteristic  of  the  relationship  of  agricul- 
turists to  artisans  in  Sirkanda.  While  many  clients  are  responsible  in- 
dividuals who  do  not  often  overtly  exercise  their  power  over  the  low 
castes,  still,  as  in  the  village  of  Karimpur  described  by  the  Wisers,  "let 
there  be  any  move  toward  independence  or  even  indifference  among 
them,  and  the  paternal  touch  becomes  a  strangle-hold"  (C.  V.  and 
W.  H.  Wiser,  1951,  p.  18). 

Exploitation  is  not  characteristic  of  the  ritual  relationships  between 


60  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

Brahmins  and  their  clients,  nor  in  the  exchange  of  services  among  the 
artisan  castes.  The  reason  for  this  pattern  seems  to  lie  largely  in  the 
distribution  of  power — the  control  that  local  castes  exert  relative  to 
one  another. 

In  Sirkanda  low  castes  are  dependent  upon  high  castes  for  livelihood 
— almost  absolutely  so.  Moreover,  they  have  little  leverage  on  the  high 
castes  because  of  the  absence  of  caste  cohesion  among  themselves  and 
the  absence  of  caste  monopolies  on  the  essential  goods  and  services 
which  they  provide  for  the  high  castes.  The  high  castes,  in  contrast, 
are  generally  well  organized  and  able  to  present  a  united  front  to  the 
artisans  of  any  local  area.  Moreover,  potential  clients  are  sufficiently 
restricted  in  numbers,  and  villages  are  sufficiently  isolated  from  one 
another,  that  village  artisans  often  find  it  difficult  if  not  impossible  to 
seek  new  clients.  In  the  village  context,  therefore,  they  subsist  at  the 
discretion  of  their  high-caste  patrons. 

Low-caste  people  who  have  become  agriculturists  no  longer  depend- 
ent upon  their  craft  skills  are,  like  Brahmins,  free  of  obligation  to,  and 
potential  exploitation  by,  other  agriculturists.  They  have  in  most  cases 
moved  out  of  their  traditional  villages  to  nonvillage  locations  where 
they  do  not  have  to  deal  frequently  with  the  high  castes  and  where  they 
perform  most  of  their  own  labor. 

In  the  exchange  of  services  among  low  castes  in  Sirkanda  there  is  no 
opportunity  for  exploitation,  since  none  controls  the  livelihood  of 
others  nor  performs  unique  and  essential  services. 

A  feature  of  the  artisan-gaikh  relationship  that  should  not  be  over- 
looked is  the  part  played  by  high-caste  clients  in  the  work  of  the  low- 
caste  artisan.  A  scene  repeated  daily  for  several  months  during  the 
building  season  of  the  writer's  year  in  Sirkanda  took  place  at  the 
construction  site  of  the  Brahmin  family's  imposing  new  house.  The 
two  carpenter-masons  were  engaged  in  their  skilled  but  relatively  lei- 
surely work  of  placing  and  mortaring  stones,  making  window  frames, 
or  carving  columns.  Meanwhile  the  Brahmins,  women  and  men, 
struggled  with  immense  loads  of  stone  from  the  quarrying  place  % 
mile  distant.  They  quarried  the  stone,  dug,  transported,  and  mixed 
mortar  clay,  felled  and  transported  trees,  carried  corrugated  iron  sheet- 
ing from  the  valley,  handed  stones  up  to  the  masons  (who  might  airily 
reject  any  particular  stone),  and  generally  did  all  the  heavy,  dirty  work 
of  the  construction.  Their  exhausted  and  begrimed  countenances  were 
in  striking  contrast  to  those  of  the  masons,  who  often  sat  and  waited 
for  more  materials  to  be  brought.  Lesser  manifestations  of  the  same 
phenomenon  were  to  be  seen  when  Rajputs  operated  the  bellows  or 
wielded  the  sledge  under  the  direction  of  the  blacksmith  on  jobs  too 


THE   ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  6l 

pressing  or  too  big  for  him  to  handle  alone.  Rajputs  were  also  to  be 
seen  sewing  buttons  on  their  newly  made  shirts  while  the  tailor  worked 
on  more  complicated  phases  of  his  craft  in  order  to  get  a  rush  order 
finished. 

No  incongruity  was  seen  in  these  aspects  of  the  gaikh  relationship, 
and  they  did  not  embarrass  those  involved.  The  superior  skill  of  the 
artisan  in  his  specialty  was  recognized,  and  his  client  got  the  most  for 
his  money  by  arranging  to  let  the  artisan  concentrate  on  the  skilled 
aspects  of  his  work.  The  low-castes  were  still  expected  to  respond  at 
once  without  remuneration,  when  not  otherwise  employed,  to  a  call 
for  assistance  in  thatching  a  roof,  mixing  tobacco  and  molasses,  killing 
a  goat,  plastering  a  floor,  carrying  a  load,  or  assisting  in  other  ways 
when  a  high-caste  member  needed  help.  The  high  castes'  relative  ritual 
and  social  status  was  never  ignored  or  compromised. 

Occupational  Specialties 

In  Sirkanda  four  castes  of  specialists  are  represented:  Brahmins, 
the  high-caste  priests,  and  three  low-caste  artisan  groups:  blacksmiths 
(Lohar),  barbers  (Nai),  and  drummer-tailors  (Bajgi).  Each  of  these 
groups  is  tied  in  some  form  of  the  jajmani  or  gaikh  arrangement  to 
exclusively  agricultural  families  in  the  village,  and  usually  to  other 
specialist  families  as  well.  If  there  is  more  than  one  household  which 
follows  a  particular  specialty  in  the  village,  each  normally  has  its  own 
circle  of  traditional  clients,  just  as  each  agricultural  household  has  its 
own  fields.  In  each  instance  the  household  remains  the  important 
economic  unit.  The  proceeds  of  traditional  specialties,  like  those  of 
agriculture,  are  shared  within  the  household.  The  economic  roles  of 
the  occupational  specialists  will  be  considered  in  turn. 

Brahmins 

Sirkanda  Brahmins  are  primarily  agriculturists,  most  of  whose 
economic  pursuits  are  indistinguishable  from  those  of  Rajputs.  Their 
income  from  agriculture  is  equivalent  to  that  of  the  more  prosperous 
Rajputs.  Priestly  work  is  done  only  by  Jairam,  one  of  three  brothers  in 
the  family,  and  it  does  not  interfere  with  his  agricultural  work.  In  his 
own  words  and  in  obvious  reference  to  his  competitor,  a  Brahmin 
from  Tehri  Garhwal  who  gets  most  of  the  high-caste  business  from 
Sirkanda,  "Some  Brahmins  haven't  anything  else  to  do  but  spend  all 
of  their  time  gallivanting  around  doing  their  priestly  work.  I  am  too 
busy  for  that." 
Jairam  officiates  at  weddings,  funerals,  and  various  ceremonies  in 


62  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

Sirkanda  but  usually  only  when  his  competitor  is  not  available  or  needs 
assistance,  or  when  a  request  comes  from  low-caste  people,  whom  his 
competitor  will  not  serve.  He  is  too  close  to  people  in  Sirkanda  to  be 
held  in  awe  or  any  great  respect.  The  Tehri  Brahmin  from  fifteen  miles 
away  is  used  whenever  possible  and  is  considered  to  be  the  family  priest 
by  most  Rajputs  of  Sirkanda.  He  is  credited  with  more  priestly  learning 
than  Jairam,  and  his  rates  are  higher.  He  serves  a  restricted  clientele  of 
high-caste  people  who  can  afford  him.  Either  Brahmin  is  paid  for  the 
work  he  does,  for  example,  around  Rs.  20  for  a  wedding  or  funeral, 
Rs.  1  to  5  for  simple  ceremonies.  These  Brahmins  are  also  the  recipients 
of  occasional  extra  charity  on  certain  religious  days  and  occasions  when 
people  want  to  acquire  merit  in  this  manner.  The  two  Brahmins  refer 
to  those  families  they  serve  regularly  as  their  "jajman."  They  can  de- 
pend upon  being  called  to  serve  any  ritual  needs  these  families  may 
have  and  to  receive  charity  as  well  as  payment  from  them.  However, 
neither  Brahmin  is  the  hereditary  priest  or  purohit  for  Sirkanda  people 
in  the  true  sense  of  the  term. 

The  traditional  Sirkanda  Brahmin  or  purohit  is  Tula,  who  lives  in 
another  village  two  hours'  walk  from  Sirkanda.  All  Sirkanda  families 
as  well  as  those  in  several  neighboring  villages  are  in  his  jajman — the 
traditional,  hereditary  client-practitioner  relationship.  The  office  has 
been  in  his  family  for  many  generations  and  continues  in  full  force 
although  Tula,  like  his  father  before  him,  practices  very  little  and  al- 
legedly knows  even  less  of  priestly  duties.  Some  generations  back  his 
family  were  highly  regarded  in  Bhatbair  as  learned  priests.  Now  they 
are  not  so  regarded  and  make  no  pretense  in  this  direction,  limiting 
their  priestly  participation  to  minor  roles  in  ceremonies,  to  astrology, 
and  so  on.  Nevertheless,  as  traditional  priest  or  purohit  in  this  and 
surrounding  villages,  Tula  attends  and  is  given  the  purohit's  charity 
and  payment  at  every  marriage,  funeral,  or  other  important  ceremonial 
event  and  at  every  occasion  calling  for  the  granting  of  charity  to  Brah- 
mins. Thus  he  receives  many  times  the  amounts  that  the  officiating 
Brahmins  do.  He  is  given  due  honor  and  respect  as  the  traditional  and 
rightful  recipient.  As  a  result  he  is  one  of  the  wealthiest  men  in  the 
area,  with  three  houses,  three  wives,  much  land,  and  many  children, 
some  of  whom  have  married  into  prominent  families  of  Garhwali 
Brahmin  ancestry  in  Dehru  Dun.  He  is  also  the  only  obese  Pahari  I 
have  ever  seen  and  is  addressed  and  referred  to  almost  exclusively  as 
"mota  Brahmin"  (fat  Brahmin).  The  jajmani  system  has  worked  to  his 
advantage. 

The  term  jajman  is  used  loosely  by  all  three  of  the  above-mentioned 


THE   ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  63 

Brahmins  to  refer  to  the  people  they  regularly  serve  (as,  "Family  X  is  in 
my  jajman").  However,  only  Tula  has  the  long-standing,  hereditary 
relationship  with  its  system  of  traditional  payment  that  is  generally 
associated  with  the  term  "jajman." 

Artisans 

All  the  artisan  (shilpkar)  castes  in  Sirkanda,  commonly  referred  to 
as  Doms,  depend  upon  their  crafts  for  their  living  and  are  to  some  ex- 
tent prevented  from  acquiring  other  means  of  livelihood.  An  artisan's 
clients  are  referred  to  as  his  gaikh  or,  commonly,  simply  "farmer" 
(kisari),  terms  which  are  roughly  parallel  in  usage  to  the  Brahmin's 
use  of  "jajman."  "Jajman"  is  also  used  sometimes  by  the  artisans, 
though  it  is  not  thought  to  be  entirely  appropriate.  The  artisan  is 
known  as  the  "worker"  (kam  karnewala)  by  his  clients.  The  client 
usually  pays  the  artisan  who  works  for  him  a  fixed  amount  of  grain  at 
each  harvest,  that  is,  twice  a  year.  There  is  not  the  rigidly  hereditary 
association  between  worker  and  client  reported  for  the  plains  (W.  H. 
Wiser,  1936).  However,  no  farmer  will  be  denied  service  by  an  artisan 
if  he  demands  it.  Threat  of  physical  punishment  can  be  used  if  neces- 
sary, with  the  backing  of  the  rest  of  the  high-caste  majority.  The  artisan 
may  use  more  subtle  pressures,  such  as  inferior  or  slow  service,  to  en- 
courage prompt  and  adequate  payment  by  a  delinquent  client.  If  an 
artisan  does  not  perform  satisfactorily,  his  clients  may  patronize  another 
craftsman  in  the  same  or  a  nearby  village. 

BLACKSMITHS 

The  blacksmith's  main  job  is  making  and  repairing  iron  tools, 
horseshoes,  bells,  occasional  religious  images,  and  so  on.  Agricultural 
implements,  axes,  and  grass  knives  make  up  most  of  the  blacksmith's 
work.  Today  there  are  two  blacksmiths,  brothers,  who  work  and  live 
separately  in  separate  households.  One  of  the  two  has  20  households 
in  his  clientele,  including  "all  the  big  people" — those  who  pay  reg- 
ularly and  well — in  Sirkanda  and  nearby  villages.  He  prides  himself 
on  having  maneuvered  himself  into  the  favor  of  the  more  desirable 
customers  by  personal  charm  rather  than  superior  work.  His  brother 
has  29  of  the  "lesser"  households  including  12  in  Sirkanda  and  17  in 
neighboring  villages.  Though  he  recognizes  the  inferiority  of  his  clien- 
tele to  his  brother's,  he  philosophizes  that  "God  will  provide  for  all." 
Some  other  households  patronize  blacksmiths  near  their  chans  and 
only  occasionally  utilize  one  of  the  Sirkanda  ones,  on  a  job-payment 
basis.  Neither  of  the  Sirkanda  blacksmiths  is  kept  very  busy  by  his 


64  THE   ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

work,  and  it  provides  only  a  marginal  income.  When  the  father  of  these 
two  men  was  the  village  smith  he  had  a  good  income;  he  is  said  to 
have  loaned  money  to  Rajputs,  and  to  have  left  a  cash  nestegg  when 
he  died.  Now  the  business  is  divided  in  half.  Moreover,  the  smiths  claim 
that  payment  has  fallen  off  as  people  have  come  to  use  ready-made  tools 
from  the  bazaar  more  frequently  and  as  households  have  increased  in 
membership  or  split  up.  Where  formerly  there  was  one  household 
there  are  now  often  two  or  three,  or  membership  has  doubled  or 
tripled,  while  the  members  continue  to  pay  a  total  of  only  one  house- 
hold's traditional  payment.  Meanwhile  other  households  have  passed 
out  of  existence  or  have  moved  to  chans,  so  that  their  business  is  lost. 
Equally  important  is  the  fact  that  formerly  grants  of  grain,  livestock, 
or  even  land,  as  well  as  clothing,  tobacco,  tools,  and  so  on,  were  given  to 
all  the  low-castes  as  gratuities.  Now  these  things  are  rarely  given.  The 
attitude  of  the  higher-castes  has  ceased  to  be  as  paternalistic  as  it  was 
in  former  days — partly,  according  to  the  high-caste  people,  because 
the  low-castes  do  not  now  conform  to  the  submissive  role  expected  in 
a  paternalistic  relationship. 

The  blacksmiths  are  the  poorest  of  Sirkanda  villagers  and  are  the 
only  ones  aside  from  two  Bajgis  who  now  own  virtually  no  land,  having 
sold  what  little  remained  of  their  holdings  some  time  ago  when  the 
extended  family  divided.  Payment  for  their  traditional  work  is  in 
five-seer  (ten-pound)  measures  of  grain.  At  each  harvest  they  are  sup- 
posed to  get  two  to  three  measures  from  each  two-oxen  household  they 
serve,  three  from  four-oxen  households,  and  four  measures  from  a  six- 
or  eight-oxen  household.  This  scale  is  not  rigidly  adhered  to,  and  the 
blacksmiths  claim  that  they  are  consistently  underpaid.  They  get  a 
total  of  16  to  18  maunds  of  grain  per  year — about  half  their  minimum 
requirement  for  livelihood.  One  of  the  blacksmiths  supplements  his 
income  by  distilling  and  selling  home-made  liquor — a  brisk  business 
yielding  25  to  35  maunds  of  grain  per  year.  The  other  has  tried  cloth- 
selling  and  other  schemes  to  augment  his  income,  all  unsuccessful 
largely  because  of  his  illiteracy  and  softheartedness,  which  have  pre- 
vented him  from  recording  and  collecting  debts  or  refusing  credit.  He 
now  makes  ends  meet  by  raising  goats,  from  which  he  nets  25  maunds 
of  grain  per  year.  He  also  does  odd  jobs  around  the  village  and  gener- 
ally remains  on  such  good  terms  with  all  villagers  that  free  meals  and 
occasional  gifts  come  his  way. 

Blacksmiths  live  a  marginal  existence,  their  income  barely  exceeding 
the  requirements  for  livelihood.  However,  they  do  not  fear  starvation 
because  they  know  that  other  villagers  will  not  allow  them  to  go  hungry 
if  they  are  really  in  need  so  long  as  they  continue  to  perform  their 


THE   ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  65 

functions  in  the  village  without  offending  their  caste  superiors.  Such 
assistance  comes  bit  by  bit  as  needed  rather  than  in  an  advance, 
security-providing  amount.  Opportunities  exist  for  blacksmiths  to  work 
where  large-scale  stone-quarrying  operations  are  in  progress  some  six 
to  ten  miles  away.  There  a  cousin  of  the  Sirkanda  blacksmiths  makes 
up  to  Rs.  20  per  day  blacksmithing.  When  asked  about  this,  one  Sir- 
kanda blacksmith  commented  that  such  work,  while  profitable,  is  un- 
certain. Here  he  has  lifetime  security  which  he  would  lose  if  he  left, 
and  the  stone  quarry  might  close  down  at  any  time.  Moreover,  he  says, 
"I've  never  worked  in  my  life."  The  latter  point  has  a  large  element 
of  truth.  No  one  in  Sirkanda  leads  a  life  as  leisurely  as  that  of  the 
blacksmiths.  This  man  volunteers  that  if  he  worked  harder  he  could 
make  more  money  right  in  Sirkanda — by  getting  work  from  customers 
in  nearby  villages  and  doing  it  promptly  and  well.  He  attributes  his 
father's  prosperity  partly  to  his  industry. 

BARBER 

The  Sirkanda  barber  is  a  descendant  of  a  barber  brought  from 
the  valley  at  the  time  of  the  founding  of  the  village.  Elsewhere  in  this 
area  the  barber's  functions  are  performed  by  other  low-caste  members, 
usually  Bajgis  and  sometimes  blacksmiths.  When  the  Sirkanda  barber 
left  the  village  for  three  years  once,  his  duties  were  taken  over  by  one 
of  the  blacksmiths.  Whoever  performs  the  barber's  functions  receives 
annual  payment  of  four  seers  (eight  pounds)  of  grain  at  each  harvest 
for  each  bewhiskered  man  in  each  household  and  two  seers  per  whis- 
kerless  boy  in  each  household  he  serves.  At  this  rate  the  Sirkanda  barber 
gets  about  25  maunds  (2,000  pounds)  of  grain  per  year  for  his  small 
family  from  his  rather  extensive  practice,  including  all  of  Sirkanda 
and  several  neighboring  settlements.  This  meets  his  subsistence  require- 
ment for  grain.  In  addition  he  receives  payment  for  his  traditional 
ritual  services  at  weddings,  funerals,  initial  hair-cutting  ceremonies, 
and  one  annual  festival  day,  ranging  from  Rs.  20  to  a  few  annas  (one 
anna  =  %  of  one  rupee)  each.  This  barber  owns  some  lands  in  Sir- 
kanda and  more  land  and  bullocks  in  the  village  of  relatives  in  the 
valley,  which  give  him  a  modest  but  comfortable  income  beyond  that 
of  his  barbering. 

BAJGIS 

The  work  of  Bajgis  in  Sirkanda  is  varied.  With  the  exception  of 
barbering,  they  perform  the  functions  common  to  their  caste  in  most 
Pahari  villages:  drum-playing,  tailoring,  and  basketmaking. 

Of  these  activities,  only  drum-playing  is  done  in  the  traditional 


66  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

artisan-gaikh  relationship.  It  is  done  for  the  entire  village  by  two 
households  working  jointly.  They  play  drums  at  all  ceremonies  and 
festivals.  In  return  for  their  drumming  each  village  household  gives 
the  drummers  16  seers  (32  pounds)  of  grain  at  each  harvest  and  oc- 
casional other  gratuities  in  the  form  of  grain.  This  income  is  divided 
between  the  two  households  who  do  this  work  in  Sirkanda.  Formerly 
it  was  one  household,  but  the  two  brothers  have  divided  their  property. 
Since  the  drumming  requires  a  team  of  two,  they  have  retained  this  as 
a  joint  enterprise  and  they  divide  the  proceeds.  In  former  days  Bajgi 
women  danced  on  special  occasions  as  part  of  the  caste's  traditional 
duties,  but  they  have  given  up  this  defiling  practice. 

Tailoring  is  an  important  activity  of  the  Bajgi  caste — so  much  so 
that  Bajgis  are  commonly  referred  to  as  Darzi  (tailors),  whether  or  not 
they  follow  this  profession.  In  Sirkanda  tailoring  is  done  on  a  piece- 
work basis  for  cash  or  its  grain  equivalent.  Rates  range  from  six  rupees 
for  a  coat  down  to  six  annas  for  a  cap.  One  man  does  all  the  tailoring 
in  Sirkanda,  and  the  payment  is  kept  in  his  household,  one  of  the 
two  drum-playing  households.  This  arrangement  was  the  basis  for  a 
major  but  short-lived  dispute  when  the  household  which  shares  the 
proceeds  of  the  drumming  activity  demanded,  but  did  not  get,  half 
the  income  from  tailoring  as  well. 

Baskets  are  made  on  a  similar  basis  at  rates  ranging  from  three  rupees 
for  a  large  grain-storage  basket  down  to  four  annas  for  a  small  basket 
or  winnowing  tray.  Three  Bajgi  households  make  baskets. 

In  addition,  one  of  the  two  non-drum-playing  Bajgis  makes  and  sells 
liquor.  The  other,  an  immigrant  of  some  twenty-five  years'  residence  in 
Sirkanda,  lives  entirely  on  his  income  as  a  practitioner  of  a  kind  of 
curative  magic.  The  two  large,  drum-playing  households  own  land  and 
bullocks,  which  provide  a  substantial  addition  to  their  other  income. 
They  get  about  18  maunds  of  grain  apiece  annually  for  drumming, 
about  one-third  of  their  grain  requirements.  They  make  another  12 
maunds  in  their  other  specialized  work,  20  maunds  from  milk,  goats, 
and  so  on,  and  40  maunds  from  their  fields.  They  are  therefore  reason- 
ably well  off.  The  two  smaller  households,  who  have  no  land  and  no 
income  from  drumming,  are  about  as  poor  as  the  blacksmiths. 

Blacksmiths  and  Bajgis  exchange  traditional  services  in  lieu  of  pay- 
ment. The  barber  is,  however,  paid  in  grain  by  all  who  have  it  and  in 
cash  equivalent  by  those  (like  the  blacksmiths)  who  do  not. 

NONRESIDENT   SPECIALISTS 

A  number  of  Pahari  occupational  specialists  contribute  to  the  Sir- 
kanda economy,  although  they  do  not  reside  in  the  village.  All  of  these 
described  below  are  represented  within  the  eight-trail-mile  (four-air- 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  67 

mile)  radius  which  is  the  area  of  face-to-face  social  and  economic  inter- 
action for  Sirkanda  villagers. 

Sarola  is  the  name  of  a  subcaste  of  Brahmins  who  specialize  in  cook- 
ing for  Brahmins  and  Rajputs  on  ceremonial  occasions.  They  are 
ritually  superior  to  other  Brahmins  and  therefore  pure  enough  that 
anyone  can  eat  from  their  hands.  Payment  is  Rs.  16  to  20  for  the  job 
or  R.  1  per  maund  (80  pounds)  of  food  cooked — whichever  is  greater 
— plus  their  board  and  shelter  while  the  job  lasts.  In  addition  they  get 
a  traditional  payment  of  2%  seers  of  gur  (sugar)  and  R.  1  at  the  time  of 
the  ceremonial  lighting  of  the  cooking  fire. 

Sonars  are  makers  of  silver  and  gold  jewelry.  In  these  hills  there  are 
two  castes  of  these  goldsmiths — one  equivalent  to  Rajputs  in  every  way, 
the  other  a  Dom  caste  equivalent  to  blacksmiths  and  carpenters.  The 
Rajput  goldsmiths  are  called  "Sonar"  as  an  occupational  term,  just  as 
are  Dom  goldsmiths,  but  they  are  Rajputs  and  intermarry  freely  with 
other  Rajputs.  Similarly  Dom  goldsmiths  intermarry  freely  with  black- 
smiths and  carpenters,  with  whom  they  are  included  under  the  broader 
occupational  classification,  Mistri.  Most  of  the  Sonars  of  this  area  are 
of  the  Rajput  group,  and  they  include  some  of  the  wealthiest  of  Paharis. 
They  are  paid  in  cash  or  grain  by  the  job.  They  have  shops  in  towns 
such  as  Mussoorie  and  in  small  trading  centers  such  as  Suakholi.  Some 
travel  from  village  to  village  taking  orders  and  doing  their  work  as  they 
go. 

Carpenter-masons  (BaRhai)  intermarry  with  blacksmiths  and  Dom 
goldsmiths,  but  their  occupational  specialty  is  usually  handed  down 
patrilineally.  They  make  wooden  tools  and  utensils  and  construct 
houses.  In  Sirkanda  most  men  make  their  own  wooden  tools,  but  car- 
penters are  called  in  to  build  houses.  Carpenters  live  in  the  village 
while  they  work,  receiving  their  food  and  shelter  plus  Rs.  4  per  day. 
They  may  also  be  paid  by  the  job,  for  example,  Rs.  80  for  sawing  out 
100  boards.  There  is  occupational  specialization  among  carpenters; 
some,  called  Rengdlda,  produce  lathe-turned  wooden  containers  and 
churns  which  are  sold  by  volume.  There  is  no  traditional  economic 
relationship  of  Sirkanda  households  with  carpenters,  though  certain 
ones  are  usually  called  in  because  of  their  skill  and  proximity. 

Kholls  are  weavers  of  wool  blankets  and  heavy  wool  cloth.  Formerly 
their  work  was  more  in  demand  than  it  is  today  because  their  cloth  was 
used  for  coats  and  they  were  virtually  the  only  source  for  blankets  and 
cloaks.  Now  cloth  from  the  bazaar  is  much  used  and  the  Kholis'  main 
trade  is  in  a  distinctive  type  of  blanket  used  as  a  wrap.  They  are  paid 
a  piece  rate,  an  arm  and  hand  length  of  loom  width  being  the  unit  and 
costing  Rs.  2.50  if  the  customer  furnishes  the  wool. 

There  are  several  terms  for  people  whose  profession  is  singing  and 


68  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

dancing.  The  only  Paharis  of  this  profession  in  Bhatbair  are  called 
Beda.  One  family  of  this  caste  has  long  been  associated  with  Bhatbair, 
and,  though  they  have  moved  from  their  traditional  home  in  a  village 
in  the  heart  of  Bhatbair,  they  still  live  within  walking  distance  in  a 
Pahari  village  bordering  the  valley.  They  (two  men  and  one  or  two 
women)  visit  Sirkanda  and  other  Bhatbair  villages  about  once  a  year, 
staying  three  or  four  days  in  each  village  and  going  from  house  to  house 
entertaining  with  songs  and  dances.  For  this  they  receive  2  to  4  seers 
of  grain  from  each  house.  People  of  this  caste  are  thought  to  possess 
unusual  spiritual  powers.  They  were  formerly  the  performers  of  the 
rope-sliding  feat,  a  spectacular  form  of  worship  which,  when  performed, 
brought  them  a  large  lump  sum  of  cash  and  goods  as  well  as  a  great 
deal  of  honor  (Berreman,  1961b).  Since  Beda  women  dance  and  sing, 
they  are  thought  of  as  prostitutes.  Today  the  Bedas  are  primarily  ag- 
riculturists and  are  trying  to  give  up  their  hereditary  occupation  and 
the  stigma  attached  to  it.  They  have  ceased  to  give  evening  command 
performances  while  in  the  village,  apparently  because  these  were  linked 
to  prostitution.  Instead  they  perform  only  in  the  daytime  at  each  house 
and  they  give  a  public  performance  in  the  evening  in  one  place.  Ac- 
cording to  the  present  practitioners  of  the  trade  they  would  give  it  up 
altogether  as,  indeed,  they  intend  to,  if  it  were  not  for  pressure  from 
their  father  to  carry  on  in  the  family  tradition. 

Mochis  or  Chamars  are  shoemakers  and  removers  of  dead  animals. 
They  are  not  indigenous  to  this  Pahari  region,  although  farther  back 
in  Tehri  Garhwal  there  are  local  people  of  this  caste.  Those  who  live 
and  work  near  Bhatbair  come  from  the  Kangra  valley,  a  Pahari  area 
some  150  miles  to  the  west.  They  have  been  in  the  region  for  20  or  30 
years  or  more.  Before  they  came,  villagers  assert,  people  here  went  bare- 
foot, as  many  of  them  do  yet.  They  remain  culturally  distinct  and  are 
readily  identifiable  by  dress,  house  type,  and  speech,  although  not  by 
physical  type.  Their  work  is  more  defiling  and  their  caste  rank  lower 
than  that  of  any  other  group  in  these  hills.  They  sell  shoes  by  the  pair, 
or  by  an  arrangement  in  which  a  household  gives  them  5  seers  of  grain 
per  harvest  in  return  for  which  they  provide  all  the  shoes  needed  in 
that  household  at  R.  1  per  pair.  In  addition  they  are  called  to  remove 
any  large  domestic  animal  which  dies.  In  return  they  keep  the  skin  and 
give  the  owner  a  pair  of  shoes  unless  the  animal  is  a  cow  or  an  ox,  in 
which  case  the  owner  takes  nothing.  A  few  years  ago  a  family  of  this 
caste  moved  to  the  outskirts  of  Sirkanda  but  found  it  unprofitable  and 
moved  on  to  Sahas  Dhara,  a  larger  center  below. 

In  addition  there  are  ten  to  fifteen  other  Garhwali  service  castes, 
most  of  them  never  seen  in  Sirkanda.  Some,  such  as  rope  bridge-makers, 
may  be  called  upon  if  a  special  need  arises. 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  69 

NONCASTE    OCCUPATIONS 

Several  important  occupations  are  not  closely  or  rigidly  bound  to 
caste.  Farming  is  foremost  among  these,  as  evidenced  by  the  fact  that 
currently  some  members  of  every  caste  in  Bhatbair  make  a  substantial 
part  of  their  living  by  farming. 

Special  occupations  in  this  caste-neutral  category  are  primarily  those 
associated  with  divining,  curing,  and  dealing  with  the  supernatural. 
Whatever  their  caste,  practitioners  of  these  arts  are  paid  in  cash  or  grain 
for  their  work.  One  Bajgi  in  Sirkanda  makes  his  entire  living  from  his 
work  as  a  practitioner  of  curing  through  exorcising  spirits.  Another 
makes  some  income  as  a  diviner.  Specialists  in  the  treatment  of  various 
maladies  (chickenpox,  mumps,  boils,  snakebite)  are  found  among  all 
castes.  Jairam,  the  Sirkanda  Brahmin,  carries  on  a  brisk  business  in 
simple  Vedic  medical  practice,  that  is,  curing  based  on  ancient  Hindu 
prescriptions.  Shamans  are  found  in  several  villages  in  and  near  Bhat- 
bair and  are  frequently  consulted  to  learn  the  cause  of  difficulties  be- 
setting families  or  individuals.  In  the  process  a  god  enters  the  shaman's 
body,  speaks  through  his  mouth,  and  provides  the  desired  informa- 
tion. The  shaman,  who  may  be  of  any  caste,  is  paid  a  small  fee  for 
each  consultation.  Pujarls  specialize  in  the  worship  of  household  gods, 
playing  drums  and  reciting  praise  of  these  gods  to  induce  them  to 
dance  in  the  bodies  of  the  worshipers  and  frequently  to  speak  through 
them.  These  practitioners  come  from  all  castes,  with  a  tendency  toward 
the  lower  castes.  They  too  are  paid  by  the  job. 

There  is  no  Pahari  Vaishya  or  merchant  caste.  Shopkeepers  and 
peddlers  come  from  the  plains,  from  Tibet  and  Nepal,  and  from  all 
Pahari  castes.  Of  three  Pahari  tradesmen  in  Bhatbair,  two  are  Rajputs 
and  one  is  a  Brahmin.  As  mentioned  previously,  a  Sirkanda  blacksmith 
tried  his  hand  at  selling  cloth  throughout  the  region  for  several  years, 
and  people  of  all  castes  may  become  temporary  shopkeepers  at  the 
annual  fair. 

SERVANTS 

Some  high-caste  agriculturists  of  Sirkanda  employ  servants  to  help 
tend  their  fields  and  livestock.  Those  who  do  the  hiring  are  people 
who  have  more  land,  or  land  in  more  scattered  locations,  than  the  men 
in  the  family  can  handle.  In  a  small  family  with  considerable  land  a 
good  servant  pays  his  way  many  times  over. 

Servants  live  with  their  employers  and  are  paid  a  small  amount 
monthly  (Rs.  10  to  30).  Because  of  their  close  association  with  their 
employers  they  are  chosen  from  high  castes  to  avoid  problems  of  rit- 
ual pollution.  Thus,  of  the  three  permanent  servants  in  Sirkanda,  two 


JO  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

are  Rajputs  and  one  a  Brahmin — all  Paharis,  two  from  Nepal  and  one 
from  Tehri-Garhwal.  Servants  are  given  responsibilities  equivalent  to 
those  of  a  family  member,  often  being  left  for  long  periods  to  look  after 
a  chan,  and  frequently  one  of  its  owner's  wives  and  her  children  as  well. 
A  lifelong  servant  is  generally  given  land  and  a  house  as  a  reward  for 
faithful  service.  The  oldest  resident  of  Sirkanda  is  the  widow  of  a  man 
whose  father  came  to  Sirkanda  as  a  servant  and  remained  there  after 
having  thus  acquired  lands. 

Temporary  servants  in  the  person  of  carpenter-masons  engaged  in 
house  construction,  or  indebted  high-caste  men  (often  relatives  of  their 
employers)  working  as  laborers,  are  generally  to  be  found  in  the  village 
during  the  winter  housebuilding  season.  As  many  as  eight  of  these 
were  resident  in  the  village  at  once  during  1957-1958. 

Occupational  Variation 

Occupational  variation  within  caste  is  found  throughout  India 
(cf.  J.  M.  Mahar,  1958;  Sharma,  1961).  Paharis  are  tolerant  and  flexible 
in  this  respect.  As  mentioned  above,  in  addition  to  the  traditionally 
caste-neutral  occupation  of  agriculture,  there  are  a  variety  of  magical- 
medical  practitioners  of  all  castes,  Rajput  goldsmiths,  merchants  of 
blacksmith,  Rajput,  and  Brahmin  castes,  and  high-caste  agricultural 
servants.  Barber  functions  are  shared  among  several  low-caste  groups. 
In  general,  low  castes  share  the  artisan  occupations,  and  not  uncom- 
monly a  member  of  one  low  caste  will  be  found  doing  the  work  of 
another,  especially  where  economy  demands  it  and  population  does 
not  provide  the  appropriate  caste  specialist.  Thus  either  blacksmiths 
or  drummers  may  serve  as  barbers,  either  may  serve  as  tailors,  and  it 
is  not  unheard-of  for  a  blacksmith  to  play  drums.  Such  occupational 
flexibility  is  characteristic  of  caste  and  economic  organization  in  the 
hills.  Just  as  status  differences  among  Dom  groups  are  somewhat  am- 
biguous, so  are  their  occupational  specializations.  For  both  purposes, 
Doms  are  often  treated  by  the  high  castes  as  an  undifferentiated  group. 
Even  high  castes  perform  the  work  of  artisans  on  occasion.  They 
exhibit  many  of  the  skills  of  artisans  while  assisting  them  in  their  work 
in  order  to  hurry  things  along  or  to  save  payment.  Since  there  was  no 
carpenter  in  Sirkanda,  Rajputs  and  Brahmins  did  their  own  routine 
carpentry,  calling  in  an  outside  specialist  only  for  major  building  jobs 
or  tasks  requiring  unusual  skill.  In  addition  high-caste  people  are  not 
entirely  barred  from  becoming  professional  artisans.  An  example  that 
has  already  been  mentioned  is  that  of  the  Rajput  goldsmiths.  An  ex- 
ample on  the  individual  level  is  that  of  a  skilled  carpenter  of  Bhatbair 
who  is  a  Rajput  and  is  accepted  as  such  in  every  respect,  although  he 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  71 

makes  his  living  in  precisely  the  fashion  of  low-caste  carpenters  and  in 
their  company.  Another  highly  respected  Rajput  of  Sirkanda  worked 
for  a  Vaishya  shopkeeper  as  a  servant  in  the  trading  village  of  Nagal. 


Outside  Employment 

Residents  of  Sirkanda  and  Bhatbair  have  not  been  attracted  in 
large  numbers  to  outside  employment.  Most  of  those  who  have,  have 
been  gone  only  a  short  time.  A  frequent  pattern  of  adolescent  male 
behavior  is  running  away  from  the  village.  Boys  often  go  to  the  plains 
to  wander  around,  see  the  sights,  engage  in  sporadic  employment,  and 
in  a  few  months  return  to  remain  in  the  village.  At  least  this  has  been 
the  pattern  until  the  present.  Perhaps  with  improved  preparation 
through  the  village  school  and  increased  job  opportunities  outside, 
the  high  return  rate  will  decrease. 

Six  recent  cases  of  the  kind  concerned  boys  13  to  15  years  of  age. 
Two,  a  Brahmin  and  a  Rajput,  ran  away  together  to  Delhi,  where  they 
worked  for  three  months  in  a  tea  stall  washing  dishes  and  delivering 
tea  at  Rs.  15  per  month  plus  board  and  room.  They  came  back  after 
they  had  had  enough  of  city  life  and  had  been  unable  to  find  more  in- 
spiring or  remunerative  labor.  As  one  said,  "You  could  spend  all  your 
life  washing  glasses  in  a  tea  stall  and  never  get  anywhere."  A  black- 
smith boy  had  run  away  to  Dehra  Dun  twice,  staying  three  or  four 
months  each  time  and  working  once  in  a  tea  stall  and  once  in  an  em- 
broidery shop,  at  Rs.  15  per  month.  One  boy  was  taken  by  an  employer 
from  Dehra  Dun  to  Naini  Tal,  100  miles  to  the  southeast,  where  he 
worked  as  a  kitchen  boy  for  seven  months  before  coming  home.  Another 
worked  in  a  dairy  south  of  Delhi  for  five  months  and  then  returned. 
Two  boys  left  during  the  winter  of  1957-1958  and  had  not  yet  been 
heard  from  seven  months  later.  More  than  once  people  from  neighbor- 
ing villages  came  through  Sirkanda  in  quest  of  runaway  sons.  At  least 
five  older  men  in  Sirkanda  recounted  similar  youthful  adventures. 
That  not  all  return  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  three  or  four  men  were 
listed  in  the  genealogical  survey  as  having  disappeared  from  the  village 
in  their  youth  and  having  never  been  heard  from  again. 

Needless  to  say,  such  short-lived  escapades  result  in  little  economic 
gain  for  those  involved,  and  by  the  time  worried  relatives  have  gone 
to  look  for  and  bring  back  the  truants,  as  is  frequently  done,  the  finan- 
cial loss  to  the  household  is  appreciable. 

Not  all  outside  employment  is  of  this  youthful  and  transitory  nature. 
One  young  Sirkanda  Rajput  left  the  village  as  a  result  of  a  family  dis- 
pute (there  is  nearly  always  some  such  motivating  incident),  and  got  a 


72  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

job  in  a  textile  mill  in  an  industrial  suburb  of  Delhi.  He  has  been  at 
it  six  years,  has  been  promoted,  and  has  no  intention  of  leaving  the 
job.  He  occasionally  visits  Sirkanda,  but  does  not  keep  in  close  touch 
with  his  family  and  sends  little  or  nothing  in  the  way  of  financial  aid — ■ 
partly  because  he  spends  most  of  what  he  makes  (Rs.  120  per  month) 
and  partly  because  the  family  dispute  has  alienated  him  from  his 
household.  In  the  minds  of  villagers,  he  is  the  single  example  of  a 
local  boy  who  has  made  good  on  the  outside.  Another  young  man  left 
the  village  early  in  the  period  of  my  residence  to  join  the  millworker. 
He  got  a  job  at  Rs.  70  per  month  at  which  he  was  still  working  a  year 
later,  and  he  gave  no  indications  of  quitting.  He  had  hoped  to  send 
money  home  but  had  as  yet  failed  to  make  enough  to  enable  him  to  do 
so.  His  departure — in  secrecy — worked  a  real  hardship  on  his  family, 
as  he  was  one  of  only  two  adult  males  available  to  work  the  land  upon 
which  ten  people  depended  for  livelihood. 

One  Rajput  had  left  the  village  several  years  previously  to  escape 
some  outside  creditors,  and  ended  up  running  a  tea  stall  for  over  two 
years  in  Kalsi,  a  town  in  the  Dehra  Dun  valley  20  miles  to  the  west. 
He  returned  at  the  urging  of  relatives,  stayed  three  years,  and  again 
left  for  an  unknown  destination.  Two  Sirkanda  Rajput  men  had  been 
in  the  army  during  World  War  II,  though  neither  left  India.  Both 
returned  to  the  village  after  demobilization.  One,  however,  neglected 
to  procure  a  discharge  and  was  later  picked  up  and  forced  to  return 
to  the  army  where  he  is  today,  having  served  about  ten  years  in  two 
periods.  Both  these  men  sent  money  to  their  families  sufficient  to  con- 
tribute substantially  to  the  support  of  their  dependents,  though  in  both 
cases  they  and  others  felt  that  economic  as  well  as  emotional  ties 
would  have  been  better  served  by  their  presence  in  the  village.  Several 
other  men  of  Bhatbair,  but  outside  Sirkanda,  served  in  World  War  II, 
including  men  of  Rajput,  blacksmith,  carpenter,  and  shoemaker  castes. 
A  carpenter  and  a  shoemaker  who  work  for  Sirkanda  families  had  each 
served  several  years  in  both  the  African  and  Pacific  theaters  of  opera- 
tions, one  with  American  and  the  other  with  British  troops.  All  these 
men  were  able  to  make  sufficient  income  so  that  their  families  did  not 
suffer.  One  deceased  Sirkanda  Rajput  served  in  World  War  I,  as  did  a 
Rajput  shopkeeper  from  a  nearby  village. 

Dehra  Dun  is  not  an  industrial  city  and  does  not  offer  many  em- 
ployment opportunities  for  people  who  are  uneducated,  as  are  most 
Paharis  of  this  region.  This  situation  probably  contributes  to  the  low 
rate  of  outside  employment.  Two  educated  young  men  of  villages  on 
the  edge  of  Bhatbair  near  Dehra  Dun  (a  Brahmin  and  a  Rajput  whose 
wives  are  from  Sirkanda)  have  gotten  jobs  in  that  city — one  with  a 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  73 

small  government  ordnance  factory  employing  primarily  skilled  per- 
sonnel, and  the  other  with  the  office  staff  of  a  limestone  quarrying  com- 
pany which  operates  near  Bhatbair.  Both  make  about  Rs.  100  per 
month  and  live  at  home,  so  that  they  contribute  a  substantial  amount 
to  supplement  the  agricultural  income  of  their  families. 

The  total  number  of  Paharis  in  the  ordnance  factory  is  only  ten  or 
twelve,  and  the  others  are  all  from  a  neighboring  region  in  Tehri 
Garhwal.  The  husband  of  another  Sirkanda  woman  who  lives  in  the 
Bhatbair  village  nearest  Dehra  Dun  has  become  wealthy  as  a  result 
of  having  been  given  the  contract  to  maintain  the  Rajpur  canal,  which 
supplies  much  of  the  water  used  in  Dehra  Dun. 

One  Sirkanda  Rajput  moved  to  Sahas  Dhara,  a  small  trading  center 
and  site  of  a  popular  religious  shrine  five  miles  below  Sirkanda,  where 
he  made  his  living  for  many  years  as  a  shopkeeper  and  where  he  is 
now  retired.  A  Sirkanda-born  blacksmith  makes  his  living  in  the  same 
place,  largely  from  the  work  he  gets  from  commercial  limestone  quar- 
ries in  the  area. 

These  make  up  the  sum  total  of  Sirkanda  men,  plus  a  sampling  of 
others  from  Bhatbair,  who  have  engaged  in  outside  employment.  The 
importance  of  such  employment  to  village  economy  is  small,  though 
possibly  it  presages  things  to  come.  To  the  present,  no  Sirkanda  vil- 
lager has  relatives  resident  in  Dehra  Dun.  No  Sirkanda  couple 
or  larger  family  unit  has  migrated  from  the  village  to  a  larger  center. 
One  of  the  men  who  was  in  the  army  took  his  wife  with  him  for  a 
period  of  about  six  months  and  then  brought  her  back  to  Sirkanda. 
The  man  who  recently  went  to  work  in  the  cloth  mill  sent  without 
success  for  his  wife,  but  would  not  come  back  after  her.  Rarely  is  out- 
side employment  considered  more  than  a  temporary  activity.  Rarely 
is  the  type  of  employment  available  spoken  of  by  others  with  approval 
or  admiration.  Nearly  every  person  who  has  left  the  Bhatbair  area  to 
work  has  done  so  surreptitiously  and  without  advance  warning.  Other 
aspects  and  implications  of  these  defections,  and  of  outside  experiences 
and  contacts  in  general,  will  be  discussed  in  chapter  9. 

Illegal  Economic  Activities 

Liquor  is  manufactured  independently  by  two  men  in  Sirkanda, 
a  Bajgi  and  a  blacksmith.  In  other  villages  other  castes  engage  in  this 
activity,  but  most  are  nonagricultural  castes,  probably  because  they 
have  more  time  to  devote  to  such  side-line  enterprises  and  more  need 
for  the  additional  income.  Since  to  sell  untaxed  liquor  is  illegal,  there 
is  an  element  of  risk,  and  therefore  of  secrecy.  Usually  the  distilling 


74  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

apparatus  is  so  designed  as  to  be  easily  and  quickly  disassembled,  and 
always  it  is  well  concealed.  Any  particular  distillery  may  close  down  sud- 
denly and  indefinitely  if  the  owner  fears  detection  by  outside  authorities, 
whose  approach  is  usually,  of  course,  relayed  well  in  advance.  Detection 
can  lead  to  fine  and  imprisonment  or  demands  for  large  bribes.  The  liq- 
uor is  made  by  soaking  any  of  several  grains  in  sugar  and  water  for  about 
a  week,  and  then  distilling  it.  The  product  has  a  high  alcohol  content. 
It  is  drunk  for  effect  rather  than  taste  and  is  in  constant  demand  at 
R.  1  per  bottle.  No  celebration  is  complete  without  liquor.  Liquor 
manufacture  and  selling  is  a  profitable  business,  especially  at  festival 
times,  when  the  demand  generally  exceeds  the  supply. 

Marijuana  is  also  produced  in  the  village.  Its  addicts  mix  it  with 
locally  grown  tobacco  and  smoke  it  to  produce  a  euphoric  effect.  Its 
sale  is  illegal,  and  the  two  or  three  Sirkanda  men  who  use  it  prepare 
their  own  or  buy  it  illegally  from  neighboring  villagers. 

Another  much  publicized  and  criticized  illegal  activity  of  hillmen  is 
the  traffic  in  women.  Although  its  prevalence  has  been  exaggerated  and 
it  is  evidently  on  the  decrease,  it  has  at  times  been  an  important  ac- 
tivity among  certain  people  of  all  castes.  The  procedure  is  simple: 
Pahari  women  of  any  caste  but  especially  of  the  low  castes,  and  almost 
invariably  married  women,  who  are  unhappy  with  the  hard  and  simple 
life  of  the  hills  and  who  have  heard  and  have  been  convinced  of  the 
luxuries  and  pleasures  of  plains  life,  are  helped  by  a  Pahari,  often  of 
their  acquaintance,  to  travel  to  Dehra  Dun  or  some  other  center.  There 
they  are  turned  over  as  wife  to  a  contact  man.  The  woman  may  live 
as  the  wife  or  concubine  of  this  person  permanently  or  temporarily, 
she  may  be  turned  over  to  someone  else  seeking  a  wife  or  concubine, 
or  she  may  be  utilized  in  prostitution.  The  Pahari's  profit  in  the  trans- 
action is  in  the  initial  payment  made  by  the  man  who  received  the 
woman  to  the  one  who  delivered  her.  One  transaction  may  net  the 
"abductor"  several  hundred  or  a  thousand  rupees,  which  is  clear  profit, 
as  the  wronged  husband  is  unable  to  collect  compensation  unless  he 
can  find  the  person  who  was  responsible,  effect  his  arrest,  and  press 
court  action.  Occasionally  a  husband  or  other  family  member  may 
cooperate  in  the  transaction. 

Sisters  and  wives  of  people  now  living  in  Sirkanda  have  been  sub- 
ject to  this  experience.  One  Bajgi  woman  currently  resident  in  Sirkanda 
had  been  abducted  and  sold  in  her  youth,  but  she  returned  after  a  few 
years.  More  commonly  such  women  are  not  heard  from  again.  Tula, 
the  hereditary  Brahmin  of  the  village,  was  one  of  a  trio,  together  with 
a  Rajput  and  a  Bajgi,  who  carried  on  this  traffic  some  25  years  ago. 
They  were  apprehended,  convicted,  and  imprisoned.  Only  Tula  re- 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  75 

turned,  one  man  having  died  in  prison  and  the  other  having  escaped 
and  disappeared.  Tula's  priestly  standing  seems  to  have  been  unaf- 
fected by  the  incident.  The  men  of  one  whole  Rajput  household  in  the 
village  were  at  one  time  actively  engaged  in  this  trade;  several  were 
eventually  caught,  and  others  left  the  region  to  escape  prosecution. 
Several  Sirkanda  men  have  occasionally  profited  from  participation  in 
such  transactions,  as  recently  as  the  past  ten  years.  Most  of  these  were 
not  members  of  a  professional  gang,  as  were  Tula  and  the  household 
mentioned  above,  but  rather  were  men  who  took  advantage  of  an  op- 
portunity when  it  arose.  Several  factional  disputes  in  Sirkanda  can 
be  traced  to  incidents  of  this  nature. 

Throughout  North  India  the  hills  are  thought  of  as  a  source  of  pros- 
titutes, sought  after  for  their  beauty  and  lack  of  inhibition.  Paharis  and 
plains  people  alike  assert  the  truth  of  this  statement,  at  least  as  ap- 
plied to  the  states  bordering  the  hills.  This  is  not  to  say  that  there  are 
prostitutes  in  abundance  in  the  hill  areas,  but  rather  that  many  pros- 
titutes come  originally  from  the  area.  Apparently  the  process  described 
above  accounts  for  the  transportation  of  a  good  number  of  women  to 
the  plains.  The  custom  of  "bride-price"  marriage  in  the  hills  facilitates 
such  transactions,  as  it  is  customary  to  take  money  for  women  in  per- 
fectly valid  marriage  arrangements.  It  is  not  uncommon  for  men  from 
the  plains  to  come  to  the  hills  looking  for  brides  from  poor  families 
who  may  not  be  too  inquisitive  or  particular  about  their  credentials. 
Some  of  these  men  are  genuine  seekers  of  wives.  At  least  two  low-caste 
Sirkanda  women  are  today  in  distant  places  as  the  wives  of  such  men, 
and  are  apparently  happy.  Some  men  have  less  noble  motives.  On  the 
other  hand  prostitution  is  not  despised  by  the  lowest  castes,  from  which 
these  girls  (at  least  those  who  are  heard  from  again)  usually  come.  It 
is  an  occupation  providing  a  good  income  by  Pahari  standards  and  it 
has  a  certain  glamour  as  compared  with  village  life,  because  of  its 
association  with  an  urban  setting.  While  not  marriageable,  these  girls 
are  not  outcastes,  and  they  visit  their  homes  occasionally.  A  famous 
prostitute  of  Dehra  Dun  is  the  sister-in-law  of  two  Sirkanda  Bajgis,  and 
prostitutes  of  Mussoorie  and  Dehra  Dun  who  come  from  villages  in 
the  vicinity  of  Bhatbair  are  known  and  patronized,  at  a  discount,  by 
Sirkanda  men. 

Division  of  Labor  by  Sex 

Paharis  work  hard  to  make  their  living  and  in  return  they  are 
able  to  lead  a  fairly  secure  existence.  Men,  women,  and  children 
above  the  age  of  about  eight  years  all  make  their  contribution  to 


76  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

family  economy.  The  men  are  the  heads  of  the  families  and  make  the 
decisions  in  economic  matters.  Men  do  all  the  plowing  and  other 
cultivation  of  fields  that  is  done  with  animals.  They  also  generally 
sow  the  fields.  Men  market  the  produce  and  do  the  family's  trading. 
They  deal  with  all  outsiders  and  outside  agencies,  though  women, 
too,  participate  in  buying  from  peddlers.  Men  see  to  the  construction 
and  repair  of  houses  and  fields;  they  make  and  maintain  household 
equipment. 

Women  cook  and  care  for  children.  They  collect  most  of  the  fodder 
for  animals  and,  with  the  children,  tend  the  animals  most  of  the  time. 
They  take  care  of  the  manure,  dry  it,  store  it,  and  are  primarily  respon- 
sible for  seeing  that  the  fields  are  fertilized  with  it.  They  carry  most 
of  the  water  for  the  family  and  animals.  They  winnow  the  grain 
after  it  is  threshed  and  prepare  it  for  storage.  When  the  time  comes, 
they  prepare  the  food  for  cooking.  They  do  unskilled  labor  in  assist- 
ing the  men  in  constructing  houses,  terracing  fields,  and  clearing  land. 

Men,  women,  and  children  all  take  part  in  weeding  crops,  harvest- 
ing, and  threshing,  though  men  are  often  engaged  in  plowing  by  the 
time  the  harvesting  and  threshing  are  well  under  way,  and  so  they 
participate  relatively  little  in  them.  Everyone  collects  firewood.  All 
spin  wool  into  yarn  and  knit  yarn  into  garments  in  their  free  mo- 
ments. 

In  the  artisan  and  priestly  castes  men  do  the  specialized  work  and 
women  perform  nearly  the  same  tasks  as  do  women  in  exclusively  agri- 
cultural families.  In  the  tailoring  and  basketmaking  castes  they  may 
occasionally  help  their  menfolk  do  some  of  the  stitching  or  weaving. 

One  of  the  most  striking  features  of  Pahari  life  is  how  hard  the 
women,  in  particular,  work.  Even  a  person  who  has  been  accustomed 
to  plains  villages,  where  women,  especially  those  of  the  lower  castes, 
are  far  from  idle,  cannot  help  being  struck  by  this  feature  of  Pahari 
life.  Women  are  almost  constantly  at  work  carrying  headloads  of 
fodder,  firewood,  manure,  water,  grain,  flour,  and,  in  building  season, 
rocks  and  clay — often  herding  cattle  or  goats  at  the  same  time.  They 
are  frequently  gone  from  the  village  most  of  the  day  collecting  grass, 
leaves,  or  firewood  and  tending  animals  in  the  forest.  On  moonlit 
nights  at  harvest  time  they  often  come  out  to  work  after  the  evening 
meal,  from  ten  to  one  at  night.  They  are  rarely  idle.  Men  too  work 
hard,  but  the  winter  and  rainy  seasons  are  periods  of  relative  inactivity, 
and  in  all  seasons  except  plowing  and  planting  they  spend  some  time 
sitting,  talking,  and  smoking.  Children  from  an  early  age  help  their 
mothers,  engage  in  herding  goats  or  cattle,  look  after  younger  children, 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  77 

bring  water,  fodder,  and  firewood,  and  in  the  specialist  castes  learn 
the  traditional  trade. 


Cooperative  Labor 

Most  work  in  Sirkanda  is  done  on  a  family  basis  or  with  hired 
assistance.  There  is,  however,  a  tradition  of  cooperative  group  labor 
within  the  community  which  cuts  across  lines  of  kinship  and  caste. 
Such  voluntary  help  (called  madat  dena,  to  give  help)  is  undertaken 
when  someone  announces  that  he  needs  help  on  a  task.  On  the  ap- 
pointed day  all  those  who  are  free  to  do  so  assemble  at  the  place  of 
work.  The  only  people  likely  not  to  participate  or  to  be  asked  to 
participate  are  those  who  have  had  a  dispute  with  the  person  to  be 
helped  or  with  others  closely  identified  with  him.  The  principal  oc- 
casion for  cooperative  labor  is  the  transplanting  of  rice.  Occasionally 
weeding  of  rice  or  of  other  rainy-season  crops  is  done  cooperatively. 
Special  songs,  vigorous,  rhythmic,  and  heroic  in  theme,  are  sung  by 
those  who  participate  in  such  cooperative  agricultural  work.  When- 
ever there  is  a  great  deal  of  carrying  to  be  done  over  considerable 
distances,  cooperative  labor  may  be  employed,  as  when  wood,  slate, 
or  sheet  iron  is  to  be  brought  for  house  construction.  Roof  beams  are 
lifted  into  place  on  a  new  house  in  this  cooperative  manner.  After  the 
work  is  completed  the  "host"  serves  some  refreshment,  but  no  formal 
obligation  to  repay  is  incurred. 

Village  property,  such  as  the  water  supply  and  the  trails,  are  re- 
paired cooperatively  when  their  condition  demands.  Since  Inde- 
pendence there  has  been  a  tendency  to  feel  that  the  government  should 
look  after  the  trails.  Governmental  attempts  at  enlisting  the  voluntary 
cooperative  labor  of  villagers  have  met  with  little  or  no  success,  the 
common  complaint  being  that  the  government  servants  who  make 
the  requests  are  paid  employees,  so  they  should  do  the  work  rather 
than  asking  villagers  to  do  it.  "What  right  has  a  salaried  official  to  ask 
for  voluntary  work  from  others?"  "Pay  us  sixty  rupees  a  month  and 
we'll  do  voluntary  labor  willingly."  This  attitude  relates  to  a  larger 
area  of  attitudes  toward  the  government  to  be  discussed  in  chapter  9. 

Inheritance 

Property  is  normally  passed  down  within  the  patrilocal  extended 
family  in  this  area.  When  a  man  dies  his  property  goes  to  his  sons 
as  a  group.  If  his  wife  is  living  it  stays  in  her  custody  until  her 


y8  THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT 

death  or  remarriage,  at  which  time  it  goes  to  his  sons.  If  a  man  leaves 
no  sons  and  designates  no  son  surrogate,  his  nearest  male  relatives 
(in  order:  brothers,  father's  brothers,  father's  brother's  sons)  take  their 
place  in  the  line  of  inheritance.  This  is  at  variance  with  Hindu  law, 
according  to  Joshi,  but  it  is  in  accordance  with  Khasa  customary 
law: 

The  distinct  feature  of  Khasa  agnatic  succession  is  that  the  inheritance 
does  not  go  to  an  individual,  but  to  a  group,  which  may  consist  of  the  male 
descendants  of  the  propositus  himself  or  of  those  of  one  of  his  ascendants. 
There  is  no  rule  of  the  nearer  agnate  excluding  the  more  remote  such  as  is 
found  in  Hindu  law.  The  sons  of  a  deceased  brother  take  the  share  which 
their  father  would  have  received  if  he  had  been  alive  when  the  inheritance 
opens.  .  .  .  The  distinction  between  undivided  brothers  or  between  full 
blood  and  half  blood  .  .  .  has  no  place  in  Khasa  customary  law.  .  .  .  The 
rules  of  inheritance  are  based  on  the  theory  that  agnates  alone  are  entitled 
to  the  estate  left  by  a  deceased  person,  and  that  the  ancestral  land  held  by 
a  person  who  has  no  male  descendants  reverts  to  the  immediate  parent  stock 
and  is  distributable  accordingly.  (Joshi,  1929,  pp.  296  f.) 

If  there  is  no  son,  an  adopted  son,  a  daughter's  son,  or  a  son-in-law 
can  be  designated  to  substitute  for  a  son,  both  in  inheritance  of  property 
and  in  performance  of  the  father's  funeral  rites.  In  each  of  these  cases 
the  heir  must  come  to  live  in  the  house  of  the  one  from  whom  he  will 
inherit  (Berreman,  1962c).  A  son-in-law  who  assumes  this  function 
lives  with  his  wife's  father  and  is  known  as  a  "house  son-in-law."  Ac- 
tually the  inheritance  in  such  a  case  remains  in  the  hands  of  the  woman 
and  ultimately  passes  on  to  her  sons  (or  lacking  sons,  to  her  lineage 
mates)  unless  a  bequest  has  been  made  to  her  husband.  However,  the 
husband  has  use  of  the  land  during  his  lifetime.  This  status  is  em- 
barrassing for  the  son-in-law  in  a  patrilocal  society,  but  it  is  sufficiently 
advantageous  to  all  concerned  that  it  occurs  quite  often.  Since  sib 
membership  is  patrilineal,  this  arrangement  often  results  in  a  transfer 
of  property  to  another  sib.  Houses  and  land  in  Sirkanda  have  been 
transferred  in  this  manner  to  sibs  other  than  those  in  which  they  were 
originally  held.7  If  no  lineage  claimants  exist,  property  reverts  to  the 
village,  not  the  caste.  A  woman's  jewelry  is  treated  as  her  husband's 
property  for  purposes  of  inheritance. 

Incorporeal  property  such  as  jajman  or  gaikh  clients  and  the  he- 
reditary title  of  mukhia — a  village  leader — is  inherited  similarly. 
Where,  as  with  a  hereditary  title,  there  is  a  single,  discrete  entity  to 
be  passed  along,  it  goes  to  the  eldest  son.  Where  no  son  is  left,  in- 
corporeal property,  like  other  property,  may  go  to  a  near  male  agnate 
or  may  be  assigned  to  the  husband  of  a  daughter  who  lives  in  her 


THE    ECONOMIC    CONTEXT  79 

father's  house,  and  thence  to  the  daughter's  son,  or  it  may  go  directly 
to  a  daughter's  son  who  comes  to  live  in  his  mother's  father's  house. 
Thus  the  Sirkanda  barber  inherited  his  clients  from  his  mother's 
father.  As  with  corporeal  property,  the  arrangement  often  results  in 
transfer  of  the  property  to  another  sib. 

In  this  patrilocal  society  the  levirate  is  practiced:  a  wife  is  inherited 
by  her  husband's  eldest  surviving  brother  or  equivalent  relative.  At 
least,  first  claim  to  her  is  so  inherited  and  the  decision  as  to  whether 
she  will  become  his  real  wife,  or  the  wife  of  another  brother,  or  not, 
is  left  to  him.  If  she  wishes  to  marry  a  nonfamily  member  (as  she 
often  does)  she  is  generally  allowed  to  do  so  but,  unless  she  runs  away 
(as  she  also  often  does)  or  receives  special  permission,  payment  has 
to  be  made  by  the  new  husband  to  the  family  of  the  deceased  husband. 
When  a  woman  leaves  or  is  left  by  her  husband,  her  children  generally 
remain  with  their  father's  family.  In  this  way  property  is  kept  in  the 
patrilocal  extended  family. 


5  THE    RELIGIOUS    CONTEXT 

THE   SUPERNATURAL 


Most  Paharis  are  Hindus,  as  evidenced  by  their  own  profession  of 
faith  and  by  application  of  any  realistic  definition  of  that  term  to 
observation  of  the  behavior  they  exhibit  and  the  beliefs  they  profess 
relating  to  the  supernatural  world.1  D.  N.  Majumdar  (1944,  pp.  139  ff.) 
supports  this  statement  in  his  discussion  of  the  people  of  Jaunsar- 
Bawar:  "The  Khasas  are  Hindus;  their  customary  rites  in  temples, 
the  manner  and  mode  of  offering  sacrifices  .  .  .  periodical  festivals 
...  all  indicate  their  Hindu  origin  .  .  ." 

They  are  not  orthodox  Hindus.  That  is,  they  are  not  highly 
Sanskritized  or  Brahmanical  in  that  they  do  not  adhere  closely  to 
written  prescriptions  and  proscriptions  of  post-Vedic  Hinduism  (cf. 
Srinivas,  1952,  p.  30;  1956).  This  unorthodoxy  is  evidently  confusing 
to  many  who  are  familiar  with  Khasas.  Majumdar,  a  few  pages  be- 
yond the  above-quoted  passage  wherein  he  verifies  the  Hinduism  of 
the  Khasas,  says: 

While  the  Khasas  claim  to  be  Hindus  .  .  .  their  social  life  as  well  as  their 
beliefs  and  practices  connected  with  their  religion  do  not  identify  them  with 
the  Hindus  of  the  plains.  They  re-marry  their  widows,  practise  levirate, 
sororate  and  polyandry,  recognize  divorce  as  legal,  while  inter-marriage  be- 
tween the  various  Khasa  groups  is  not  tabooed  and  children  born  of  such 
marriages  do  not  suffer  any  social  stigma.  While  they  worship  Hindu  gods 
and  goddesses,  they  have  a  partiality  for  ancestor  spirits,  queer  and  fan- 
tastic demons  and  gods  and  for  the  worship  of  stones,  weapons,  dyed  rags  and 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  Ol 

symbols.  The  sun,  the  moon  and  the  constellations  are  their  gods.  (Majumdar, 
1944.  P-  15°) 

Paharis  themselves  are  well  aware  of  these  deviations  from  high-caste 
orthodoxy  of  the  plains,  and  in  fact  they  often  actively  try  to  emulate 
plains  rituals  in  order  to  raise  their  status  in  the  eyes  of  other  Hindus. 
That  their  unorthodoxy  makes  them  any  the  less  Hindu  is  contra- 
dicted by  a  comparison  of  their  own  traditions,  practices,  and  beliefs 
with  the  range  of  equivalent  traits  among  village  Hindus  elsewhere 
in  India  (cf.  Cohn,  1954,  pp.  174  ff.;  Dube,  1955,  pp.  88  ff.;  Lewis, 
1958,  pp.  197  ff.,  249  ff.;  P.  M.  Mahar,  1957,  i960;  Marriott,  1955a; 
Opler,  1958;  Planalp,  1956;  Srinivas,  1952). 

Hinduism  in  Sirkanda  shares  virtually  all  of  its  forms  with  that 
in  the  rest  of  Bhatbair,  most  of  its  forms  with  that  in  Tehri  Garhwal, 
many  with  that  in  other  Himalayan  hill  areas,  some  with  that  in 
North  India,  and  fewer  with  all-India  Hinduism. 

In  this  context  it  is  useful  to  utilize  the  concept  of  "spread"  of 
Hinduism  and  the  terms  "local  Hinduism,"  "regional  Hinduism," 
and  "national  Hinduism"  (Srinivas,  1952,  p.  213).  "Spread"  refers  to 
the  area  (horizontal  spread)  or  social  groupings  in  an  area  (vertical 
spread)  within  which  traits  associated  with  Hinduism  are  distributed. 
".  .  .  As  the  area  of  spread  decreases,  the  number  of  ritual  or  cultural 
forms  shared  in  common  increases,  as  the  area  increases,  the  common 
forms  decrease"  (Srinivas,  1952,  pp.  213  f.). 

Morgan  (1953,  pp.  3  ff.)  notes  that  Hinduism  is  "ethnic  rather  than 
creedal,"  pointing  out  the  difficulty  in  distinguishing  its  essential  fea- 
tures in  view  of  its  tremendous  diversity.  Dube  indicates  something  of 
this  diversity  and  the  complexity  of  beliefs  which  make  up  village 
Hinduism: 

A  text-book  knowledge  of  the  religious  lore  of  India,  and  an  acquaintance 
with  her  ancient  classics  and  their  modern  expositions  will  hardly  give  us 
a  true  picture  of  the  actual  religious  beliefs,  thoughts,  feelings  and  practices 
of  the  people  now  living  in  the  countryside.  A  classification  of  their  religious 
beliefs  and  rituals  is  not  an  easy  task.  Folklore  and  myths,  religious  teachings 
of  saint-poets,  and  contacts  with  persons  having  knowledge  of  scriptures  and 
popular  religious  books  have  all  influenced  their  religious  ideology,  and 
consequently  their  religion  is  a  mixture  of  animism,  animatism  and  polytheism, 
with  the  occasional  appearance  of  monotheism  also.  To  these  must  be  added 
a  living  faith  in  spirits,  ghosts,  demons,  witches  and  magic.  The  complex  of 
all  these  diverse  factors  constitutes  the  picture  of  the  supernatural  world  as 
it  is  understood  by  the  people  in  the  countryside.  Tenets  of  classical  Hinduism 
having  an  all-India  spread  are  mingled  with  the  regional  religious  beliefs 
and  forms  of  worship  current  among  the  Hindus  of  the  [particular  area]. 


82  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

Several  cults  and  worships  of  a  purely  local  nature  add  furdier  to  the 
complexity  of  the  beliefs  and  ritual  system  of  the  community.  A  wide 
variety  of  cults  is  observed  by  the  family,  some  by  the  village  as  a  whole; 
and  still  others  by  individual  caste  groups.  (Dube,  1955,  p.  88) 

Despite  its  diversity,  there  is  a  basic  unity  to  Hinduism  by  which  it 
may  be  recognized.  Morgan  (1953,  pp.  6  f.)  identifies  this  as  lying  in 
"common  scripture,  common  deities,  common  ideals,  common  beliefs, 
and  common  practices."  Srinivas  makes  a  similar  statement  and  then 
characterizes  the  elements  of  Hinduism  according  to  their  spread.  He 
describes  all-India  Hinduism  as  "chiefly  Sanskritic"  in  contrast  to  the 
more  limited  spread  of  most  non-Sanskritic  elements  in  regional  and 
local  Hinduism.  By  "Sanskritic,"  Srinivas  means  those  elements  of  all- 
India  Hinduism  which  are  recorded  in  the  classic  religious  literature 
and  are  often  called  Brahmanical  or  post-Vedic  Hinduism  by  other 
writers.  They  are  frequently  identified  as  the  "great  tradition"  of  Hin- 
duism, while  local,  regional,  and  even  universal  Hindu  beliefs  and 
practices  which  are  not  included  in  the  "literate  religious  tradition" 
are  identified  as  the  "little  tradition"  (Redfield,  1955;  Marriott,  1955a). 

It  is  apparent  to  any  student  of  village  religious  practices  and  beliefs 
that  there  is  a  considerable  body  of  non-Sanskritic  elements  of  all- 
India  spread  (cf.  Berreman,  1961b).  Care  must  be  taken  not  to  confuse 
"little  tradition"  with  "local  spread."  Many  elements  of  "little  tradi- 
tion" as  conventionally  defined  are  regional,  national,  or  greater  in 
extent. 

In  this  chapter  religion  will  be  presented  in  terms  of  beliefs  and 
practices  regarding  the  supernatural  as  they  were  observed  and  re- 
ported in  and  around  Sirkanda.  Part  of  the  purpose  is  to  illustrate  one 
variety  of  the  genus  village  Hinduism.  Another  is  to  point  out  specific 
examples  of  the  great  and  little  traditions  as  they  manifest  themselves 
in  this  village  and  to  throw  some  light  on  the  relevance  and  limitations 
of  these  concepts  in  the  village  context.  In  so  doing,  the  evidence  for 
and  the  nature  of  Sanskritization,  or  change  from  adherence  to  the 
elements  of  the  little  tradition  to  recognition  and  practice  of  the 
elements  of  the  literary  tradition  of  Hinduism  will  be  mentioned.  The 
more  immediate  purpose,  as  in  the  preceding  chapters,  will  be  to 
furnish  prefatory  material  for  the  discussion  of  social  organization  to 
follow,  and  to  illustrate  the  functions  of  kinship,  caste,  and  community 
ties  in  the  religious  sphere  of  life. 

Religious  Beliefs 

The  supernatural  is  almost  as  pervasive  in  the  minds  of  Sirkanda 
villagers  as  is  the  natural,  though  to  an  observer  it  may  be  less  readily 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  83 

apparent.  Difficulty  of  any  kind — crop  failure,  ailing  animals,  economic 
reversal,  mysterious  loss  of  property,  persistent  family  troubles,  disease, 
sterility,  stillbirth,  hysteria,  death — is  attributed  ultimately  to  fate  and 
more  immediately  to  the  machination  of  one  or  another  of  a  host  of 
supernatural  beings.  A  sizable  amount  of  time,  effort,  and  money  is 
invested  in  activities  designed  to  influence  these  beings  to  tread  lightly 
on  the  people  of  Sirkanda.  Most  of  these  activities  are  carried  on  at  the 
joint-family  level,  some  at  the  community  level,  and,  in  this  area,  prac- 
tically none  at  the  caste  level. 

The  supernatural  beings  who  affect  humans  range  from  capricious 
sprites,  malevolent  ghosts,  and  ancestral  spirits  to  household,  village, 
and  regional  gods.  On  another  level  is  a  general  belief  in  inevitable  fate 
(mukadar,  bhdg)  controlled  by  a  remote,  impersonal,  and  ultimately 
supreme  deity,  Bhagwdn  or  Nardyan.  This  deity  is  neither  personified 
nor  worshiped.  To  it  is  attributed  almost  any  event  or  circumstance 
worthy  of  notice  and  beyond  immediate  human  control.  Such  com- 
ments as  "It  is  God's  will,"  "God  only  knows,"  and  "It  is  in  the  hands 
of  God,"  are  frequently  made  by  villagers.  There  is  no  effective  means 
by  which  to  deal  with  Bhagwan  or  his  manifestation  in  fate,  although 
villagers  may  occasionally  direct  an  appeal  for  mercy  or  help  to  him  in 
a  general  way,  as  "God  help  me."  Nevertheless  there  is  lively  interest 
and  activity  in  influencing  events  by  propitiating  the  many  specific 
deities  and  other  supernatural  beings  which  are  thought  to  control  or 
influence  daily  life.  When  the  inconsistency  which  an  outsider  may  see, 
between  belief  in  inevitable  fate  and  simultaneous  efforts  to  influence 
or  control  events,  is  pointed  out  to  villagers  their  answers  are  vague 
but  not  defensive  because  their  belief  is  not  threatened.  Such  incon- 
sistencies are  considered  irrelevant.  One  informant  affirmed  that  fate  is 
inevitable,  that  Bhagwan  controls  fate  and  cannot  be  influenced,  but 
that  worship  of  specific  deities  is  still  necessary  "because  gods  are 
closely  associated  with  fate."  And  there  the  matter  rests.  Evidently  it 
is  through  gods  that  fate  is  accomplished. 

The  effects  of  predestined  and  unalterable  fate  are  everywhere  ap- 
parent. To  demonstrate  its  importance  a  villager  pointed  out  that  a 
potter  makes  many  pots  that  look  alike,  and  yet  each  has  a  different 
subsequent  history.  That  is  fate.  Similarly,  men  are  born  essentially 
alike  but  no  two  lead  the  same  life.  The  classic  example  was  that  of 
myself.  "There  are  millions  of  Americans  and  none  of  them  have  ever 
heard  of  this  small  and  distant  village.  There  are  thousands  of  villages 
in  India  to  which  no  American  has  ever  come.  Now  you  have  come  to 
live  here.  Is  not  that  evidence  enough  of  fate?"  Death,  disease,  dis- 
ability, poverty,  wealth,  beauty,  travel,  marriage — all  are  attributed  to 
fate  or  God's  will.  Weather  too  is  predetermined.  Yet  these  are  pre- 


84  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

cisely  the  things  which  villagers  seek  to  control  through  their  worship 
of  various  gods.  Late  in  the  dry  season  I  asked  a  villager  when  it  would 
rain.  His  characteristic  reply  was:  "I  do  not  sit  with  Bhagwan,  nor  am 
I  his  brother."  But  before  the  week  was  out  he  was  one  of  many  who 
participated  in  a  ceremony  calculated  to  please  specific  deities  who 
control  the  weather  and  thereby  to  bring  rain.  Of  course,  since  every- 
thing is  controlled  by  fate,  my  informant  could  retreat  to  the  argument 
that  it  was  the  villagers'  fate  to  carry  out  such  worship  with  the  pre- 
ordained results. 

Closely  allied  to  belief  in  fate  is  the  belief  in  reincarnation.  It  is 
believed  that  the  present  condition  of  any  being  is  largely  determined 
by  his  deeds  in  previous  lives.  "As  you  sow,  so  will  you  reap."  Present 
deeds  influence  fate  after  death  and  in  future  lives,  but  they  have  no 
effect  on  the  present  life.  An  informant  commented  on  the  point, 

Fate  in  life  is  determined  before  birth  and  nothing  can  alter  it.  If  a  man 
has  given  much  gold  in  charity  in  a  previous  life  he  will  in  the  next  life 
be  a  raja,  if  he  has  given  grain  he  will  be  a  money-lender,  if  he  has  taught 
others  he  will  be  a  great  leader  like  Nehru,  if  he  has  killed  a  female  or 
thirsty  wild  animal  he  will  be  a  leper  or  blind,  if  he  was  a  slanderer  he 
will  be  an  idiot,  if  he  did  not  give  ritu  dan  [seasonal  charity — man's  obliga- 
tion to  have  sexual  relations  with  his  wife  after  her  menses  each  month] 
he  will  starve  sexually. 

Disappointments  are  nearly  always  rationalized  in  terms  of  fate  as 
determined  by  misdeeds  in  previous  lives.  A  Brahmin  from  the  village 
nearest  to  Sirkanda  had  such  an  explanation  for  the  nagging,  unat- 
tractive wife  with  whom  he  had  been  saddled.  When  his  friends  asked 
him  why  he  was  so  unfortunate  he  reflected  at  length  and  finally  re- 
ported that  in  a  previous  life  he  had  been  a  crow  and  his  wife  a  camel 
on  whose  back  he  had  sat,  pecking  and  worrying  her.  Now  it  was  her 
turn  to  get  revenge.  His  friends  urged  him  to  leave  her,  but  he  replied 
that  he  could  not  as  this  was  his  fate  and  it  could  not  be  escaped  by 
running  away. 

Low-caste  status  is  always  attributed  to  misdeeds  in  previous  lives, 
while  people  who  commit  misdeeds  in  the  present  are  thought  to  be 
ensuring  punishment  in  future  lives.  The  idea  of  life  after  death  (and 
particularly  the  time  between  death  and  reincarnation)  is  a  vague  and 
confused  one  to  villagers.  Many  have  no  systematic  conception  of  what 
occurs,  and  others  hold  firmly  to  mutually  contradictory  views.  But  all 
agree  that  acts  in  this  life  determine  the  nature  of  the  next  life.  Punish- 
ment for  misdeeds  may  include  a  long  period  after  death  in  which 
the  soul  wanders  in  suffering  as  a  ghost  before  finding  a  body  in 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  85 

which  to  be  reborn.  Then  it  may  be  reborn  as  a  crawling  worm  or 
insect,  or  in  an  undesirable  human  condition.  A  good  life  is  rewarded 
by  rapid  transit  of  the  soul  to  another  body  so  that  the  cycle  of  184 
births  through  which  it  must  pass  may  be  quickly  accomplished  and 
the  ultimate  goal  attained — heaven  or,  according  to  learned  Brahmins, 
unity  with  the  infinite.  The  new  body  will  be,  in  such  cases,  one  that 
is  desirable:  if  animal,  a  bird  that  can  fly  and  enjoy  itself;  if  human, 
of  a  high  caste,  in  a  pleasant  locale  with  access  to  good  food.  Light 
skin  color,  beauty,  health,  wealth,  many  sons,  and  happiness  are  also 
considered  rewards. 

Station  of  birth  is,  therefore,  no  accident.  A  low-caste  informant  who 
had  probably  pondered  the  matter  more  than  most  Sirkanda  people, 
explained: 

America  and  England  are  pleasant  places  where  everyone  is  wealthy  and 
comfortable.  To  deserve  such  good  fortune  the  citizens  of  these  countries  must 
have  been  very  pious  Hindus  in  their  previous  lives.  On  the  other  hand, 
in  those  countries  people  do  many  evil  things  in  their  lifetimes.  They  eat 
meat,  especially  beef,  they  eat  eggs,  they  kill  people  in  great  wars.  It  is  a 
very  sinful  life.  After  death  they  must  be  punished  by  being  reborn  in  filth, 
poverty  and  sorrow — namely,  as  low-caste  people  in  India. 

He  felt  that  this  must  certainly  be  the  case,  though  he  admitted  the 
circularity  of  the  sequence  and  had  not  solved  the  problem  of  how  one 
could  escape  the  circle. 

The  same  informant  considered  birth  as  a  Pahari  to  be  punishment, 
partly  evident  in  the  hard  work,  poor  food,  and  primitive  living  condi- 
tions which  Paharis  must  endure.  Another  reason  was  also  given:  since 
nothing  in  life  is  chance — all  is  part  of  the  larger  design  called  fate — 
to  be  born  in  circumstances  where  sin  punishable  by  low  birth  is  in- 
evitable is  in  itself  a  punishment.  Thus,  to  be  born  a  Pahari,  where  the 
sin  of  taking  the  life  of  animals  in  sacrifice  is  part  of  regular  religious 
practice  demanded  by  local  deities,  is  not  an  accident;  it  is  an  indirect 
kind  of  punishment  in  that  it  will  lead  to  further  punishment  in  future 
lives.  God  or  fate  uses  it  as  an  excuse  for  further  punishment.  The 
informant  referred  to  this  as  an  "excuse  of  fate."  Perhaps  it  is  considera- 
tion of  such  factors  that  accounts  for  the  widespread  Pahari  joke, 
"When  we  Paharis  die  we  are  reborn  on  the  plains  as  donkeys."  This 
logic  might  also  explain  the  peculiar  fate  of  Americans  as  deduced  by 
the  informant.  Awareness  of  punishment  in  future  lives  does  not  lead 
Paharis  to  give  up  animal  sacrifice,  nor  would  it  prevent  them  from 
behaving  like  other  wicked  Americans  were  they  to  be  reborn  in  Amer- 
ica. It  is  all  fate  and  cannot  be  altered.  Paharis  accept  their  fate  phil- 


86  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

osophically.  A  blacksmith  who  had  learned  from  a  Brahmin  who  read 
his  horoscope,  that  he  had  been  a  raja  in  his  previous  life  and  was 
destined  to  be  a  merchant  in  the  next  shrugged  when  asked  what  he 
thought  of  the  prospect,  and  said  simply,  "I  am  adaptable." 

After  a  birth  a  Brahmin  is  called  to  read  the  horoscope  of  the  new- 
born. This  tells  with  perfect  accuracy  all  that  has  befallen  an  individual 
in  past  lives  and  all  that  will  befall  him  in  the  present  and  future  lives. 
Everything  pertaining  to  the  individual's  past  and  future  is  there  to 
be  read.  Where  inaccuracies  occur  the  Brahmin  is  either  incompetent 
or  misinformed.  The  latter  is  most  often  the  explanation,  as  accuracy 
depends  upon  precise  reporting  of  time  of  birth.  As  the  villagers 
point  out,  in  a  community  with  no  clock  this  is  a  difficult  feat. 

Deeds  in  life  which  lead  to  punishment  in  future  lives  include  fail- 
ing to  give  charity,  physically  hurting  others,  exploiting  others  or 
taking  their  property,  and  taking  to  evil  ways — robbery,  killing,  steal- 
ing, cheating,  lying,  covetousness.  Breaking  caste  rules  was  not  in- 
cluded by  informants.  Upon  inquiry,  low-caste  informants  held  that 
this  is  a  social,  not  a  spiritual,  matter,  and  is  to  be  enforced  by  man, 
not  God.  This  is  in  contrast  to  traditional  Hindu  doctrines  of  caste 
duty  and  destiny,  doctrines  which  high-caste  people  profess.  All  groups 
relegated  rules  regarding  incest,  exogamy,  endogamy,  and  other  sexual 
behavior  to  the  secular  realm. 

The  things  Pahari  men  aspire  for  in  life  regardless  of  caste  include: 
sufficient  money  to  satisfy  wants  and  a  surplus  to  lend  out  on  interest, 
good  land,  good  crops,  good  cattle,  hard-working  and  obedient  sons, 
and  profit  in  whatever  transactions  are  entered  into.  Stories  and  anec- 
dotes illustrating  the  importance  of  good  deeds  to  reap  desired  re- 
wards in  future  lives  and,  conversely,  the  dire  consequences  of  evil- 
doing  in  this  life,  are  many,  vivid,  and  well-known  in  Sirkanda. 

It  is  within  this  general  context  of  belief  in  an  impersonal,  all- 
powerful  supernatural  force  called  Bhagwan,  evidenced  in  unalterable 
fate,  that  other  beliefs  regarding  the  supernatural  are  held  in  Sirkanda. 
This  is  in  conformance  with  the  great  tradition  of  Hinduism. 

In  everyday  life  in  Sirkanda  people  think  about  and  deal  with  re- 
ligion in  terms  of  immediate  problems  of  their  welfare  and  that  of 
their  families.  The  supernatural  agents  who  are  closely  involved  in 
these  matters  are  personal,  personified  beings  whose  behavior  influ- 
ences and  can  be  influenced  by  people.  The  effective  social  unit  for 
dealing  with  most  of  these  beings  is  the  household.  As  in  economic 
activity,  so  in  religious  worship,  the  extended  family  is  the  most  sig- 
nificant element  of  social  organization. 

Village  religious  life  in  Sirkanda,  as  elsewhere  in  India,  is  primarily 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  87 

concerned  with  the  maintenance  of  proper  relations  with  supernatural 
beings  who  have  power  over  the  members  of  the  family  and  of  the 
village.  Their  displeasure  is  easily  aroused  by  neglect  and  is  quickly 
evident  in  the  several  kinds  of  difficulties,  notably  illness,  which  beset 
their  negligent  worshipers.  Fortunately,  they  can  usually  be  placated. 
Their  form,  origin,  and  affinities  are  of  less  significance  to  villagers 
than  are  their  effects  and  the  means  to  placate  them.  Some  of  these 
beings  are  gods  or  goddesses  which  affect  the  entire  village,  or  which 
affect  only  particular  households.  Others  are  ancestral  spirits.  Other 
categories  of  powerful  supernaturals  are  ghosts  and  sprites.  Some  of 
the  gods  can  be  traced  to  the  great  gods  of  Hinduism,  but  others  cannot. 
Some  spirits  are  ghosts  of  dead  relatives  or  of  known  types  of  individuals, 
while  others  cannot  be  traced  to  specific  people  or  to  people  at  all. 
These  facts  are  of  interest,  and  are  often  known,  but  are  of  little  im- 
mediate relevance  to  the  villager.  All  such  beings  are  active  forces 
which  must  be  recognized  and  dealt  with  in  specified  and  often  similar 
ways,  or  else  their  subjects  will  suffer  well-known  and  dreaded  conse- 
quences. 

Before  describing  the  patterns  of  worship  and  the  exorcism  of  these 
beings,  it  will  be  well  to  comment  briefly  on  the  phenomena  usually 
described  as  supernatural  possession.  Possession  is  a  common  occurrence 
in  Sirkanda  in  the  cause,  diagnosis,  and  alleviation  of  difficulties  of 
many  kinds.  But  it  is  not  a  uniform  process.  Its  nature  varies  with  the 
type  of  supernatural  being  involved. 

A  shaman  voluntarily  induces  his  personal  familiar  spirit  to  possess 
him  and  speak  through  him  to  his  clients.  He  does  this  by  chanting 
certain  phrases,  playing  a  drum,  and  performing  other  acts  pleasing  to 
the  spirit.  When  the  spirit  leaves  it  does  so  without  ill  effect.  Its  good 
will  is  maintained  by  the  shaman's  worship. 

Anyone  may  be  possessed  by  a  household  deity  attracted  by  the 
drumming  of  pujaris  during  worship  of  a  household  god.  Such  posses- 
sion results  in  the  deity's  dancing  in  the  worshiper's  body,  and  some- 
times in  his  speaking  through  the  worshiper.  No  one  knows  who  will 
be  possessed,  but  possession  is  expected  to  result  from  the  activities  of 
the  pujaris  on  these  occasions. 

At  village-wide  worship,  individuals  often  become  possessed  by 
village  gods,  just  as  they  do  by  household  gods  in  household  worship. 
Generally  the  person  whom  a  particular  god  will  possess  is  known  as 
the  traditional  vehicle  through  which  that  god  dances  and,  more  rarely, 
talks. 

In  all  the  above  cases  the  god  is  attracted  by  drumming,  the  rhythm 
of  which  induces  him  to  engage  in  the  pleasurable  activity  of  dancing. 


88  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

One  god,  Memendia,  possesses  people  unexpectedly  and  then  calls  for 
music  to  dance  by.  A  god's  presence  is  indicated  by  the  behavior  of  the 
one  he  possesses — especially  by  trembling,  rolling  of  the  eyes  or  fixed 
staring,  insensitivity  to  touch  or  pain,  incomprehensible  speech,  and 
generally  uncontrolled  behavior.  Once  a  god  is  present,  he  is  honored 
with  incense,  gestures  of  devotion,  and  so  on. 

Such  possession  is  described  by  a  phrase  meaning  that  a  god  has 
"come  to  the  head"  of  his  devotee.  It  is  never  harmful  to  the  one 
possessed,  and  the  deity  leaves  voluntarily.  In  fact,  the  possessed  person 
is  said  to  be  immune  to  pain  or  lasting  harm  inflicted  while  he  or  she 
is  possessed.  Gods  do  harm  individuals,  but  not  as  a  result  of  possession. 
A  god  who  is  angry  will  possess  his  victims  only  briefly  in  order  to  tell 
them  what  they  must  do  to  appease  his  anger  and  to  relieve  themselves 
of  his  punishment. 

Harmful  possession  is  of  a  different  order,  described  as  "adherence" 
of  a  ghost.  It  occurs  unexpectedly.  Usually  it  can  be  terminated  only 
by  strenuous  exorcism  by  a  specialist.  Ghosts  are  not  worshiped.  Only 
by  forcing  the  ghost  to  leave  can  the  harmful  effects  of  such  possession 
be  alleviated.  The  fact  of  ghost  possession  is  indicated  by  the  harmful 
effects  of  the  possession — great  pain  or  other  inner  torment,  illness, 
misfortune,  barrenness,  stillbirths,  mental  derangement,  physical  im- 
pairment, or  even  death.  Ghost  possession  usually  follows  severe  stress 
on  the  individual.  Calamity,  frightening  illness,  the  death  of  a  friend 
or  relative,  interpersonal  strife,  and  physical  exhaustion  immediately 
preceded  cases  of  such  possession  in  Sirkanda.  Possession  is  a  satisfactory 
explanation  or  excuse  for  almost  any  behavior.  The  one  possessed  is  an 
object  of  solicitude  rather  than  condemnation.  Possession  therefore 
appears  to  be  a  psychological  mechanism  used  to  alleviate  stress,  to  ex- 
plain otherwise  incomprehensible  and  often  taboo  behavior.  While 
women  are  more  often  subject  to  this  kind  of  possession  than  men,  it  is 
by  no  means  limited  to  women. 

Some  spirits  can  harm  people  without  possessing  them,  merely  by 
"striking"  them.  In  the  case  of  one  type  of  sprite,  such  harm  is  not  ma- 
licious nor  intended,  but  once  it  has  occurred  it  is  irreparable.  Its  only 
symptom  is  the  harm  done,  usually  a  sudden  physical,  sensory,  or  mental 
incapacity. 

Pattern  of  Worship 

The  details  of  worship  of  various  supernatural  beings  in  Sirkanda 
vary.  There  is,  however,  a  basic  pattern  underlying  most  worship  in 
the  village.  In  order  to  make  subsequent  descriptions  clear  and  varia- 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  89 

tions  more  obvious,  the  general  pattern  of  worship  will  be  presented. 
In  outline  it  bears  many  similarities  to  worship  by  plains  villagers. 

Most  supernatural  beings  make  their  presence  felt  by  imposing  diffi- 
culties or  troubles  upon  people — usually  disease  or  death  to  people  or 
animals,  and  sometimes  other  troubles  such  as  hysteria,  faithless 
spouses,  sterility,  poor  crops,  dry  cows,  financial  loss,  or  mysterious 
disappearance  of  belongings.  "Above  all  a  prevailing  health  anxiety  is 
suggested  by  the  data  regarding  ghost  and  spirit  possession"  (Opler, 
1958,  p.  566).  In  such  cases  the  householder  usually  repairs  at  once  to 
his  favorite  shaman  (baki),  or  sometimes  to  a  less  prominent  practi- 
tioner, to  find  out  what  is  causing  the  trouble  (cf.  Berreman,  1961a). 
The  only  supernaturals  regularly  worshiped  without  illness  or  other 
difficulty  as  a  signal  that  worship  is  demanded,  and  therefore  without 
the  advice  of  a  shaman  or  other  practitioner,  are  village  gods  (to  be 
defined  below).  Such  worship  follows  the  pattern  to  be  described  here 
except  that  consultation  with  the  shaman  is  omitted.  It  is  relatively 
infrequent  as  compared  to  the  worship  recommended  by  shamans, 
which  occurs  somewhere  in  the  village  every  few  weeks. 

A  shaman  is  a  man  who  may  be  of  any  caste  and  who  is  devoted  to  a 
particular  deity  for  whom  he  acts  as  medium  in  the  diagnosis  of  diffi- 
culties. It  is  from  this  practice  that  the  shaman  makes  his  living.  He 
generally  holds  regular  sessions  which  his  clients  attend.  First  he  con- 
ducts a  short  pujd  (ceremony),  and  to  the  beat  of  a  small  drum  he  sings 
mantras  (prayers  or  incantations)  in  honor  of  the  god  to  whom  he  is 
personally  devoted.  Gradually,  as  the  god  takes  possession  of  him, 
the  shaman  becomes  impervious  to  pain,  often  demonstrating  this  by 
touching  red-hot  metal  or  by  some  similar  action.  The  god  when  in 
complete  charge  speaks  and  acts  in  the  body  of  the  shaman.  The  god 
then  singles  out  the  various  waiting  clients  one  at  a  time  and  tells  each 
what  troubles  he  has  had  and  what  the  cause  is,  that  is,  what  super- 
natural being  has  been  tormenting  him,  and  what  should  be  done  to 
alleviate  the  trouble.  The  god  may  also  identify  human  thieves  or 
other  culprits  and  point  out  objects  that  have  deleterious  magical 
effects.  If  the  victim  is  not  satisfied  with  the  diagnosis  he  will  merely 
say  "The  god  knows  better  than  I,"  and  go  elsewhere  for  advice  until 
he  finds  a  shaman  who  seems  to  have  a  more  accurate  god. 

The  treatment  recommended  by  a  shaman  is  almost  invariably  per- 
formance of  a  puja  in  honor  of  the  offending  supernatural  being,  or 
exorcism  if  it  is  a  ghost.  In  cases  of  theft  the  shaman  will  merely  identify 
the  guilty  party.  In  cases  of  magical  affliction  he  may  identify  the  of- 
fending object  and  recommend  its  removal.  Treatment  may  also  be  a 
pilgrimage  or  other  specific  action  designed  to  please  the  god.  In  some 


90 


THE    SUPERNATURAL 


very  difficult  afflictions,  such  as  apparently  incurable  insanity,  an  im- 
possible recommendation  may  be  made,  such  as  sacrifice  of  a  cow 
which,  as  Hindus,  these  people  cannot  carry  out.  The  necessary  puja 
is  usually  a  stereotyped  one  for  the  particular  deity  to  be  honored. 
Sometimes  the  shaman  may  have  specific  recommendations  as  to  how, 
when,  or  where  the  worship  should  be  conducted.  The  shaman's  main 
functions  are  to  identify  the  cause  of  the  trouble  and  to  specify  what 
action  must  be  taken  to  alleviate  it  or  to  contact  the  being  responsible 
in  order  to  hear  his  demands.  From  then  on  the  family  of  the  victim 
takes  steps  to  carry  out  the  shaman's  recommendations,  for  which 
special  practitioners  are  required.  In  this  respect  the  Pahari  shaman 
differs  from  the  shaman  of  the  plains  reported  by  Opler  (1958)  and  by 
Planalp  (1956).  The  plains  shaman,  with  the  help  of  his  personal 
spirit,  induces  a  god  or  spirit  which  has  entered  the  body  of  its  victim 
to  make  known  its  demands.  Among  Paharis  the  shaman  does  not  take 
part  in  exorcism  or  in  ceremonies  in  which  the  god  speaks  through 
its  victim  and  is  ultimately  appeased.  The  Pahari  shaman  is  primarily 
a  diagnostician  who  is  able  to  call  upon  his  personal  god  at  will,  be- 
come possessed  by  him,  and  then  diagnose  the  difficulties  of  his  clients 
through  the  wisdom  of  the  god.  The  Pahari  sequence  is  virtually  identi- 
cal with  the  shamanism  of  a  Mysore  village  reported  by  Harper  (1957, 
pp.  268  ff.). 

Some  exorcists  of  ghosts  (not  bakis)  function  in  a  fashion  similar  to 
that  of  the  plains  shamans  in  that  they  perform  both  the  diagnosis  and 
exorcism,  sometimes  with  the  help  of  their  own  god.  However,  such 
practitioners  are  less  frequently  consulted  and  their  advice  is  less  val- 
ued. As  often  as  not  a  shaman  is  consulted  first,  and  he  may  direct 
his  client  to  one  of  these  practitioners  to  perform  the  exorcism.  Ma- 
levolent ghosts  are  quite  distinct  from  gods  and  ancestors  and  will  be 
described  later.  The  discussion  which  follows  applies  to  gods  and  an- 
cestors only. 

Sometimes  worship  of  a  god  or  ancestor  is  held  without  first  con- 
sulting a  shaman.  A  less  powerful  diviner  may  be  consulted  because 
he  is  more  easily  available  or  has  a  reputation  for  accuracy.  Occasion- 
ally no  specialist  is  consulted  at  all,  when  the  victims  feel  certain  they 
know  which  god  is  responsible  for  their  difficulty,  either  because  of 
experience  with  similar  past  affliction  or  because  of  an  unfulfilled  vow. 
Worship  may  also  be  held  to  fulfill  a  vow  before  trouble  has  come  to 
compel  its  performance. 

Vows  are  often  made  to  gods  and  are  a  frequent  antecedent  to  wor- 
ship. If  a  puja  or  other  propitiatory  act  which  has  been  recommended 
by  a  shaman  cannot  be  performed  at  once  for  reasons  of  economy  or 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  91 

conflicting  obligations,  a  vow  may  be  taken  to  perform  it  within  a 
certain  period.  The  vow  has  the  same  efficacy  as  performance  of  the 
puja  itself  provided  that  it  is  fulfilled.  Trouble  of  any  kind  may  be  met 
by  such  a  vow  even,  in  some  cases,  without  a  shaman's  advice.  Whether 
or  not  a  shaman  is  consulted,  the  vow  itself  is  made  without  the  services 
of  a  specialist. 

In  order  to  carry  out  the  pujas,  most  of  which  are  undertaken  on  the 
advice  of  a  shaman,  one  or  more  often  two  practitioners  who  specialize 
in  performing  worship  for  particular  gods  or  classes  of  gods  must  be 
called.  These  pujaris  (or  a  pujari  and  his  assistant)  arrange  and  per- 
form the  puja  at  the  request  of  the  family  who  is  to  sponsor  it.2  The 
purpose  of  the  puja  is  to  ensure  that  the  god  is  pleased  or  at  least  has 
a  chance  to  possess  one  of  his  victims,  dance  in  the  victim's  body,  and 
through  that  person  make  known  any  further  demands.  It  is  a  family 
member,  never  a  specialist,  who  becomes  possessed  during  the  per- 
formance. These  specialists  may  be  of  any  caste,  but  usually  they  come 
from  the  low  castes.  They  play  percussion  accompaniment  for  the 
dancing  that  is  a  part  of  every  such  performance  and  that  brings  the 
god  to  possess  his  worshipers.  In  fact,  particular  types  of  pujaris  are 
known  by  the  term  for  the  kind  of  drum  they  play,  which  in  turn  is 
determined  by  the  god  they  worship.  For  some  village  gods,  Brahmin 
priests  act  as  pujaris  in  that  they  perform  the  worship,  and  low-caste 
people  merely  play  the  drums  for  dancing. 

The  ceremonial  proceedings  in  such  worship  are  in  three  major 
parts:  the  dance,  the  puja,  and  the  offering.  The  entire  sequence 
usually  takes  place  before  the  shrine  of  the  deity  to  whom  it  is  dedi- 
cated, which  is  either  in  the  house  or  somewhere  in  or  around  the 
village. 

Preparing  the  shrine  is  a  simple  process  because,  though  it  is  ne- 
glected in  the  months  or  years  intervening  between  occasions  of  wor- 
ship, it  is  so  simple  as  to  require  little  arranging.  The  shrine  generally 
consists  of  one  to  four  simple  iron  tridents  (tirsul)  of  varying  shapes, 
about  eight  inches  in  height,  made  by  the  local  blacksmith.  These  are 
placed  in  a  niche  in  the  wall  of  an  inner  room  if  the  shrine  is  a  house- 
hold one,  or  at  the  base  of  a  large  stone  or  in  a  stone  enclosure  if  it  is 
outdoors.  During  the  ceremonies  the  shrine  is  illuminated  by  a  small 
oil  lamp,  and  often  a  container  of  grain  and  a  few  coins  are  placed  by 
it.  Sometimes  a  small  bag  filled  with  rice  and  coins  is  hung  near  the 
shrine.  Such  accouterments  are  in  the  nature  of  offerings  to  the  deity. 

The  first  stage  of  worship  is  the  dance  (kalratra,  literally  "black 
night"  or  "night  for  Kali").  It  is  intended  to  attract  the  gods  or  an- 
cestors who  like  to  dance  and  who  can  do  so  in  the  bodies  of  humans. 


g2  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

This  in  itself  is  pleasing  to  the  gods.  It  also  induces  them  to  speak  and 
air  their  complaints  and  demands  if  they  wish  to  do  so.  Usually  dancing 
occurs  during  an  evening  and  again  the  following  day.  The  puja  to 
one  god  requires  seventeen  dances  over  a  period  of  nine  days. 

A  kalratra  or  dance  begins  late  in  the  evening  of  the  appointed  day, 
when  householders,  onlookers,  and  specialists  assemble  by  the  shrine. 
The  pujaris  begin  to  play  their  instruments,  and  one  of  them  chants  or 
sings  sacred  mantras  (prayers  or  incantations)  honoring  the  deity. 
During  this  time  the  god  in  whose  honor  the  worship  is  being  held, 
and  often  other  gods  and  ancestral  spirits  as  well,  come  and  gradually 
possess  people.  The  room  is  filled  with  onlookers,  smoke,  and  heat,  and 
it  reverberates  with  the  compelling  rhythm  of  the  drums.  Gradually 
one  or  more  members  of  the  household  and  sometimes  others  as  well 
begin  to  move  in  time  to  the  drums,  then  to  jerk,  shout,  and  finally  to 
dance,  first  gently  and  then  wildly  as  they  become  possessed  by  a  god. 
This  period  is  called  "awakening."  The  possessed  person  is  honored 
with  incense  and  religious  gestures  and  is  fed  boiled  rice  because  he  or 
she  is  a  manifestation  of  the  god  at  that  time.  The  dancing  continues, 
with  occasional  breaks  for  smoking  and  talking,  far  into  the  night. 
Some  people  dance  who  are  not  possessed,  or,  if  so,  only  temporarily. 
The  same  god  may  possess  several  people  in  sequence  in  one  evening. 

Village  gods  are  worshiped  outdoors,  usually  at  the  dancing  ground 
adjacent  to  the  Pandavas'  temple  (to  be  discussed  below),  but  some- 
times near  Devi's  temple.  At  that  time  any  village  god  or  gods  may 
possess  individual  villagers.  Household  gods  do  not  possess  people  on 
these  occasions.  In  contrast  to  the  nature  of  possession  by  household 
gods,  there  is  one  particular  individual  whom  each  village  god  usually 
possesses.  Most  often  village  gods  utilize  the  state  of  possession  merely 
to  dance,  but  they  may  speak  if  they  wish  to. 

After  the  god  has  danced  his  fill,  usually  on  the  last  night  of  the 
kalratra,  he  may  leave  or  may  choose  to  speak.  If  the  latter,  the  dancer 
becomes  immobile,  speaks  unintelligibly  ("It  sounds  like  English," 
asserted  one  informant),  and  then  begins  to  answer  questions  put  to 
him.  This  stage  is  simply  called  "questioning."  The  god  tells  the  cause 
of  his  anger  and  the  action  necessary  by  the  victimized  household  to 
appease  that  anger.  Usually  he  demands  a  goat  or  other  sacrifice,  but 
sometimes  he  asks  for  a  more  elaborate  puja.  The  god  also  gives  advice, 
solves  dilemmas,  and  issues  warnings  and  ultimatums.  When  he  is 
through,  he  so  states,  the  drums  of  the  pujaris  beat  briefly,  the  god  de- 
parts, and  the  session  is  over.  The  possessed  person  shows  no  after- 
effects and  does  not  remember  the  period  of  possession,  although  I 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  93 

noted  that  some  showed  a  remarkable  ability  to  recall  the  number  and 
subject  matter  of  photographs  taken  during  possession. 

Shortly  after  the  god  has  left,  the  pujari  and  the  victimized  members 
perform  a  short  ceremony  or  puja  in  the  god's  honor,  and  then  make 
an  offering.  The  offering  to  be  made,  usually  a  young  male  goat,  is 
placed  before  the  shrine  and  rice  is  thrown  on  its  back  by  the  household 
members  as  the  pujari  chants  mantras.  When  the  goat  shakes  itself, 
this  is  taken  as  evidence  that  the  god  has  accepted  the  offering.  There- 
upon the  animal  is  taken  outside  and  beheaded — usually  but  not  al- 
ways by  some  low-caste  person,  as  high-caste  people  consider  this  some- 
what defiling  and  prefer  not  to  do  it.  Then  a  foot  and  the  head  of  the 
animal  and  some  delicacies  such  as  bread  and  sweet  rice  are  placed 
before  the  shrine  as  offerings  for  the  god.  Afterwards  the  pujari  takes 
these  items  along  with  his  fee  of  Rs.  1.25.  The  rest  of  the  animal  is 
divided  among  the  participating  householders  and  observers. 

The  efficacy  of  worshiping  gods  to  combat  difficulties  is  not  doubted 
by  most  villagers,  and  many  cases  of  miraculous  results  are  cited  in 
support  of  their  belief.  One  teen-age  boy  professed  disbelief  until  his 
father,  sick  with  pneumonia,  began  to  breathe  more  easily  as  soon  as 
the  practitioner  began  his  mantras.  In  the  boy's  words,  "I  never  believed 
until  I  saw  it  work  on  my  father.  A  dying  man  was  saved  by  mantras 
to  the  god.  That  is  proof."  Another  informant  replied  to  my  question 
as  to  the  effect  of  such  a  puja  in  his  household:  "Of  course  it  worked. 
We  satisfied  the  god's  every  demand,  didn't  we?"  On  the  occasion  of  an 
elaborate  and  difficult  puja,  an  informant  commented:  "Why  not  go 
to  all  this  trouble?  It  gets  results.  Gods  are  like  lawyers;  the  more  you 
give  them,  the  more  they  will  do  in  your  behalf." 

The  intended  result  of  these  observances  is  to  alleviate  difficulties 
attributed  to  deities,  or  in  the  case  of  worship  of  some  village  gods,  to 
ensure  their  continued  good  will.  An  important  latent  function  is  that 
of  providing  entertainment,  relaxation,  and  social  intercourse  for  the 
spectators.  At  the  same  time  they  reinforce  ties  of  kinship  and  village 
solidarity.  There  are  few  recreational  activities  for  these  hard-working, 
isolated  people,  and  the  occurrence  of  a  puja  of  some  sort  every  few 
weeks  is  a  welcome  break  in  routine.  It  is  also  one  of  the  few  occasions 
upon  which  there  is  widespread  involvement  in  a  common  activity. 
Every  such  event  involves  participation  of  a  group  of  kinfolk  or  of  the 
entire  village,  and  it  plays  to  a  full  house  of  all  castes  including  a  large 
proportion  of  women  and  children  who  have  less  access  to  varied  ex- 
perience and  entertainment  than  do  men.  The  behavior  of  the  audi- 
ences at  such  exercises  is  very  similar  to  that  of  cinema  audiences  in  the 


g4  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

big  towns  of  the  valley.  They  smoke,  talk,  wander  in  and  out,  and 
generally  enjoy  the  show. 

More  than  once  informants  implied  that  a  particular  puja  was  held 
by  someone  (not  of  their  own  household)  largely  as  an  excuse  to  kill 
a  goat  and  have  a  feast.  Generally  when  a  puja  is  to  be  held  people  lay 
in  a  supply  of  liquor,  the  perennial  accompaniment  of  meat  at  Sir- 
kanda  "parties."  A  kalratra  for  village  gods,  as  distinguished  from 
household  gods,  is  largely  a  social  and  recreational  occasion  for  par- 
ticipants and  spectators  alike,  and  only  occasionally  does  a  god  seize 
the  opportunity  to  talk  or  make  demands  of  villagers.  More  often  the 
gods  merely  enjoy  this  opportunity  to  dance,  and  many  of  the  dancers 
participate  without  benefit  of  supernatural  possession. 

The  nature  of  worship  of  the  gods  honored  in  most  of  these  pujas  is 
definitely  placative.  It  consists  of  efforts  to  appease  angry  deities,  to 
cater  to  their  cravings  for  worship  and  sacrifice. 

The  truth  is  that  popular  religion  in  these  hills  is  a  worship  of  fear.  .  .  . 
When  famine  and  pestilence  stalks  abroad,  village  temples  are  crowded  and 
promises  of  oblations  are  made;  if  the  evil  be  averted  these  promises  are  ful- 
filled, if  not  the  deity  is  frequently  abused  and  his  shrine  is  neglected.  The 
efforts  of  all  are  directed  to  appease  the  malevolence  of  these  spirits  who 
are  supposed  to  lie  in  wait  to  take  advantage  of  any  error  willingly  or  un- 
willingly committed.  .  .  .  (Atkinson,  1884a,  p.  839) 

Villagers  themselves  sometimes  describe  their  worship  as  motivated 
by  fear.  One  man  asserted,  "If  a  god  can  do  no  harm,  it  has  no  power 
and  need  not  be  worshiped."  Another  commented,  "All  gods  are  bad, 
but  Nor  Singh  and  Agorndth  are  the  most  terrible  of  all."  Most  gods 
are  feared  for  the  power  they  have  to  punish  men  who  incur  their 
wrath.  The  exceptions  are  certain  village  gods,  to  be  discussed  below. 
Even  they  have  the  power  to  punish,  but  they  are  primarily  benevolent. 
The  prevalence  of  disease,  untimely  death,  and  unpredictable  mis- 
fortune stands  as  a  constant  reminder  of  this  power.  Fear  of  gods  is 
continually  reinforced  by  attribution  to  them,  especially  by  shamans 
and  diviners,  of  almost  every  misfortune  that  occurs.  If  a  god  whose 
worship  depends  on  fear  fails  to  make  his  power  felt  by  punishing 
people,  he  is  rarely  or  never  worshiped  and  is  soon  forgotten.  Anxiety 
is  maintained  by  the  fact  that  misfortune  often  strikes  where  it  is  least 
expected.  However,  though  fear  is  an  important  motive,  it  is  not  help- 
less fear.  Gods  do  not  punish  randomly  or  capriciously.  They  punish 
when  punishment  is  due.  The  offense  is  generally  unintended  and  is 
often  unknown  or  unrecognized,  but  a  shaman  can  usually  detect  it. 
Most  often  the  offense  has  been  that  of  neglecting  the  god — failing  to 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  95 

worship  adequately.  The  offense  may  have  been  one  against  the  god 
or  against  one  of  his  devotees;  the  essential  thing  is  that  the  god  has 
interpreted  it  as  an  action  or  oversight  deserving  of  punishment.  The 
victim  is  not  helpless.  In  fact,  he  has  at  his  disposal  extremely  effective 
means  of  appeasement,  which  are  sometimes  difficult  and  often  ex- 
pensive, but  are  rarely  beyond  the  realm  of  possibility.  The  efficacy  of 
these  means  is  attested  by  the  many  spectacular  successes  people  recall, 
the  routine  reliance  upon  them,  and  the  readily  available  alternative 
explanations  for  apparent  failures. 

Therefore,  Sirkanda  villagers  do  not  lead  a  life  dominated  by  helpless 
terror  of  the  gods  they  worship.  Observation  of  worship  reveals  a  range 
in  individual  attitudes  from  relative  indifference  to  enthusiasm,  from 
apprehension  to  confidence.  It  seems  that  gods  are  treated  much  as  are 
powerful  people.  They  are  feared  insofar  as  it  is  well  known  that  their 
anger  can  lead  to  serious  consequences.  On  the  other  hand,  it  is  known 
that  the  means  to  prevent  or  assuage  their  anger  are  at  hand  and  are 
often  easily  put  into  play,  as  is  not  often  the  case  in  dealing  with 
powerful  secular  forces.  The  prevailing  attitude  is  one  of  respectful 
awareness  of  what  are  conceived  to  be  the  realities  of  life  in  a  world 
where  ultimate  powers  are  in  the  hands  of  divine  beings,  whose  anger 
is  easily  and  often  unwittingly  aroused,  but  whose  demands  are  com- 
municated to  their  subjects  and  can  usually  be  met.  Worship  is  the 
means  by  which  these  dangerous  beings  are  controlled. 

Gods 

By  far  the  most  active  class  of  supernatural  beings  in  Sirkanda  are 
the  gods  and  goddesses  (devta,  devl)  or,  as  they  are  sometimes  referred 
to  in  English,  the  godlings.  Gods  indigenous  to  Sirkanda  are  referred 
to  in  the  village  as  ghar  ka  devta  (household  gods)  or  kul  devta  (family 
gods)  and  are  thereby  distinguished  from  gods  of  other  villages  and 
other  regions.  Any  god  to  which  local  people  are  devoted  is  isht  devta. 
These  terms  are  used  loosely  and  often  interchangeably  in  the  village. 
However,  an  analytic  distinction  can  be  drawn  to  categorize  deities  in 
Sirkanda  as  household  gods  and  village  gods.  Household  gods  will  here 
be  defined  as  those  gods  worshiped  consistently  by  the  members  of  a 
particular  household  as  a  group,  usually  within  the  house,  where  the 
shrines  are  kept,  and  not  worshiped  jointly  with  the  members  of  other 
households,  nor  with  the  aid  of  Brahmin  priests.  Devotion  to  these 
gods  is  passed  down  in  the  lineage.  Village  gods  are  those  gods  wor- 
shiped jointly  by  all  or  nearly  all  villagers  at  some  central  shrine 
called  a  temple  (mandir)  in  or  near  the  village.  The  worship  is  usually 


g6  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

under  the  supervision  of  a  local  Brahmin  priest.  One  worships  these 
particular  village  gods  because  he  is  a  Sirkanda  villager.  Other  dif- 
ferences between  these  two  categories  of  gods  will  be  mentioned  in  the 
course  of  discussion  of  each  class.  This  dichotomy  is  not  commonly,  if 
at  all,  noticed  by  villagers,  though  it  is  evident  to  the  observer  of  re- 
ligious behavior  in  the  village.  Neither  is  it  a  rigid  distinction.  Some 
household  gods  have  gradually  shifted  to  become  essentially  village 
gods.  Some  village  gods  have  been  adopted  as  household  gods  by  one  or 
two  families.  Occasionally  particular  households  worship  village  gods 
individually  at  their  village  shrines.  Certain  village  gods  are  not  wor- 
shiped by  every  household.  Some  household  gods  in  Sirkanda  are  vil- 
lage gods  in  other  areas,  and  vice  versa.  A  distinction  is,  however,  use- 
ful for  purposes  of  presentation.  In  the  beginning  it  is  usually  the  god 
himself,  speaking  through  a  shaman  or  some  other  person,  who  directs 
the  type  of  shrine  and  worship  to  be  given  him. 

Household  Gods 

Six  major  household  gods  are  worshiped  in  Sirkanda  homes:  Nar 
Singh,  Manglla,  Gauril,  Nag  Raja,  Agorndth,  and  Dhagbairu.3  Each 
of  these  gods  is  worshiped  by  certain  households  and  not  by  others. 
Thus,  of  the  45  Sirkanda  households,  41,  none  of  whom  are  Brahmins 
or  Bajgis,  worship  Nar  Singh;  28,  all  Rajputs,  worship  Manglia;  13  (1 
Brahmin,  7  Rajputs,  1  blacksmith,  and  4  Bajgis)  worship  Gauril;  13, 
all  Rajputs,  worship  Nag  Raja;  3,  all  Bajgis,  worship  Agornath;  2 
Rajput  households  worship  Dhagbairu.  These  gods  appear  in  villages 
throughout  the  area.  Not  every  village  contains  households  worshiping 
each  of  them,  and  some  have  households  worshiping  other  gods,  but 
the  pattern  is  the  same  and  none  of  these  deities  is  unique  to  a  par- 
ticular village.  Every  household  which  worships  one  of  these  gods, 
except  some  of  those  worshiping  Nar  Singh  and  Nag  Raja,  has  a 
shrine,  called  "god's  place,"  dedicated  to  that  god,  and  usually  the 
shrine  is  inside  the  house.  In  those  houses  worshiping  more  than  one 
god,  which  includes  all  but  five  of  the  45  in  Sirkanda,  separate  shrines 
are  kept  for  each  god.  When  joint  families  divide,  each  new  household 
unit  sets  up  its  own  shrines  to  the  family  gods. 

Household  gods  are  the  most  acutely  feared  gods  worshiped  in 
Sirkanda.  They  are  worshiped  as  long  as,  and  to  the  extent  that,  they 
demonstrate  their  power  and  interest  by  tormenting  household  mem- 
bers and  placing  demands  upon  them.  Each  is  usually  worshiped  in 
ceremonies  directed  exclusively  to  him  and  calculated  to  alleviate 
trouble  attributed  to  him  by  a  shaman.  The  god  has  generally  been 
displeased  by  neglect  of  worship  or  unfulfilled  vows.  However,  trouble 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  97 

may  also  stem  from  a  plea  to  the  god  by  one  of  his  devotees  who  wishes 
to  inflict  harm.  A  god  can  be  induced,  by  worship,  sacrifice,  or  vows, 
to  attack  one's  enemy  if  the  enemy  is  either  a  nonworshiper  or  a 
less  faithful  worshiper  of  that  god.  The  victim  learns  the  cause  of  his 
trouble  by  consulting  a  shaman.  To  alleviate  the  attack,  the  victim 
must  worship  the  god.  If  he  is  not  already  a  devotee  of  the  god,  he 
must  worship  that  god  in  some  house  where  there  is  a  shrine — and 
generally  no  other  household  wants  to  become  involved  with  the  god's 
wrath — or  else  he  must  set  up  a  shrine  of  his  own,  in  his  own  house. 
Then  he  becomes  the  god's  devotee  and  must  continue  to  worship  him 
because  the  god  thereafter  frequents  his  house. 

Three  recent  cases  were  reported  in  Sirkanda,  in  each  of  which  a 
wife  found  that  her  husband  was  having  illicit  sexual  relations  with 
another  woman.  Thereupon  the  aggrieved  wife  verbally  abused  the 
other  woman  in  public.  In  response  to  this  abuse  the  other  woman  set 
her  household  god's  wrath  upon  the  wife.  A  puja  to  that  god  therefore 
had  to  be  performed  in  the  house  of  the  wife,  and  her  husband  thereby 
acquired  a  new  household  god.  In  another  case  a  policeman  was  set 
upon  by  the  god  of  a  household  whose  members  he  had  apprehended 
for  selling  diluted  milk.  He  had  to  worship  their  god,  thereby  acquiring 
him  as  a  household  god,  and  to  reimburse  them.  These  examples,  in 
addition  to  their  relevance  to  an  understanding  of  village  religion, 
provide  an  interesting  indication  of  attitudes  on  sex  and  interpersonal 
relations  (to  be  discussed  in  chapter  5). 

The  most  common  source  of  a  new  god  in  a  household  is  a  bride, 
who  usually  comes  from  another  village.  Her  household  god  frequently 
goes  or  is  sent  with  the  girl  to  her  new  home  and  protects  her  in- 
terests there.  Such  a  god  is  known  as  mathzva  devta,  as  distinguished 
from  the  ghar  ka  devta  that  already  frequents  the  household.  If  the 
bride  is  mistreated  in  her  new  home  or  if  her  family  is  slighted  at 
the  wedding  or  in  subsequent  situations,  the  god  will  attack  the  family 
of  the  groom.  This  may  happen  at  any  time  after  marriage.  Then  it 
is  necessary  for  the  groom's  family  to  placate  the  god  by  worship.  If 
the  god  is  one  not  already  worshiped  in  the  house,  a  new  shrine  must 
be  set  up  for  him  and  thereafter  he  is  a  household  god,  although  at 
kalratra  he  will  usually  possess  only  the  bride  and  will  voice  his  de- 
mands through  her.  Later  he  may  possess  her  daughters-in-law  or  other 
female  relatives. 

A  household  god  may  also  be  acquired  if  a  shaman  diagnoses  some 
misfortune  as  the  work  of  a  god  who  has  not  previously  been  wor- 
shiped or  even  known  in  the  household  he  has  attacked,  and  who  is 
not  acting  on  behalf  or  at  the  bidding  of  a  worshiper.  The  god  simply 


98  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

demands  attention  and  utilizes  this  means  to  acquire  it.  In  any  event, 
the  result  is  the  same  in  that  the  god  must  be  worshiped  to  be  ap- 
peased. He  then  acquires  a  shrine,  bringing  occasional  trouble  and 
demanding  occasional  worship. 

Therefore,  although  most  of  the  household  gods  currently  wor- 
shiped in  Sirkanda  have  been  in  the  families  of  their  worshipers  for 
several  generations,  the  acquisition  of  new  gods  is  not  an  unusual 
event.  Several  informants  remembered  when  their  families  began  to 
worship  current  household  gods.  Likewise,  as  interest  in  old  gods  is 
lost,  they  lose  significance  and  are  finally  forgotten.  When  new  houses 
are  built  or  families  separate,  the  members  will  not  bother  to  devote 
shrines  to  ineffectual  gods,  while  in  the  old  family  home  those  shrines 
may  be  ignored.  Some  Sirkanda  villagers  remember  that  their  im- 
mediate ancestors  worshiped  none  or  only  some  of  the  present  gods, 
but  most  are  unable  to  specify  which  ones  were  worshiped  previously. 

A  special  household  ceremony  is  performed  to  protect  a  new  house 
and  its  occupants  from  alien  gods  and  spirits.  It  is  similar  in  purpose 
to  the  village-protection  rite  to  be  mentioned  below,  but  it  protects 
the  household  group  rather  than  the  village.  It  is  called  literally,  "house 
pot."  In  the  ceremony  an  all-night  puja  is  performed  in  which  a  pot 
containing  certain  sacred  items  is  sealed  into  the  house  wall,  where  it 
remains  to  protect  the  household  from  disease,  accident,  violent  death, 
financial  reversal,  and  crop  failure. 

Other  ceremonies  associated  with  the  house  and  household  members 
are  those  performed  by  carpenters  when  they  place  doorframes  and 
the  ornamental  archways  in  a  new  house,  and  those  performed  by 
Brahmins  to  purify  a  house  after  pollution  by  violent  death  or  by 
occupation  by  low-caste  people,  anthropologists,  and  the  like.  All  assure 
the  future  well-being  of  those  who  occupy  the  dwelling,  and  inhibit 
the  depredations  of  alien  supernaturals.  The  only  occasion  upon  which 
Brahmin  priests  regularly  participate  in  worship  of  household  gods 
is  during  the  marriage  ceremony,  when  the  good  will  of  the  gods  is 
secured  by  invoking  a  brief  blessing. 

Village  Gods 

There  are  seven  shrines  in  Sirkanda  devoted  to  what  are  here 
termed  village  gods.  All  are  in  the  immediate  vicinity  of  Sirkanda,  the 
most  distant  being  that  to  Matri  a.  half-mile  away  on  the  crest  of  the 
bill  which  dominates  the  village  (map  3). 

All  village  gods  are  worshiped  at  village  temples  (mandir)  rather 
than  in  the  home,  and  usually  a  Brahmin  conducts  the  worship  rather 
than  a  low-caste  pujari.  Village  gods  are  distinguished  from  household 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  99 

gods  primarily  by  this  greater  honor  and  by  the  fact  that  their  relevance 
and  worship  is  not  household-specific.  Some  may  have  begun  as  house- 
hold gods,  but  they  have  not  remained  as  such.  All  village  gods  can  be 
and  occasionally  are  worshiped  by  all  or  nearly  all  villagers.  A  few 
households,  lineages,  or  sibs  are  partial  to  certain  village  gods  and 
not  to  others,  but  there  is  not  the  pattern  of  household  devotion  or 
non-devotion  found  with  household  gods.  Several  temples  are  identi- 
fied with  particular  lineages  whose  members  are  temple  keepers,  main- 
taining the  temple,  supervising  worship  there,  and  receiving  offerings 
on  behalf  of  the  god,  but  worship  at  a  village  temple  is  not  private  or 
limited  to  particular  households. 

Worship  of  village  gods  does  not  follow  a  uniform  pattern  to  the 
extent  found  among  household  gods,  though  the  same  elements  of 
worship  occur — kalratra,  puja,  sacrifice.  The  worship  of  village  gods 
tends  not  to  be  as  specific  or  mutually  exclusive  as  that  of  household 
gods.  Often  several  village  gods  are  worshiped  together  in  a  single 
ceremony.  Each  village  god  possesses  some  villager  at  ceremonies  in 
his  honor  and  often  at  other  village-wide  ceremonies.  Most  village  gods 
possess  the  same  individual  each  time  they  appear.  When  that  individ- 
ual dies  they  usually  shift  to  another  member  of  the  same  lineage,  sib, 
or  clan,  but  sometimes  they  shift  even  to  another  caste.  The  god's 
possession  of  an  individual  is  thought  to  be  auspicious  for  the  whole 
village,  not  merely  or  even  especially  for  that  individual's  lineage  or 
household  as  in  the  case  of  household  gods.  Village  gods  speak  to  their 
worshipers  less  frequently  than  household  gods  and  torment  them  less, 
usually  being  content  to  dance  occasionally  in  their  bodies. 

Village  gods  can  inflict  troubles  on  their  worshipers,  but  they  are 
less  cantankerous  and  hence  less  feared  than  household  gods.  Worship 
of  them  does  not  depend  upon  fear  of  the  consequences  of  failure  to 
worship  to  the  extent  that  is  true  of  household  gods.  While  most  village 
gods  are  sometimes  worshiped  to  alleviate  specific  difficulties  which 
according  to  a  shaman's  diagnosis  they  have  imposed  or  can  counter- 
act, they  are  often  worshiped  simply  to  maintain  the  status  quo  of 
village  life.  Thus,  they  figure  in  periodic  worship  and  that  performed 
in  stereotyped  situations,  as  well  as  in  worship  indicated  by  a  shaman's 
diagnosis.  Finally,  they  are  more  permanent  than  household  gods  in 
the  village  pantheon.  Household  gods  come  and  go;  village  gods  rarely 
do  so,  partly  because  they  are  not  so  dependent  on  a  shaman's  advice 
for  their  continued  relevance  to  village  life,  and  partly  because  they 
enjoy  village-wide  interest  and  support  which  is  less  fickle  and  less 
subject  to  alteration  by  happenstance  and  petty  disagreements. 

As  with  worship  of  other  supernatural  beings,  worship  of  village  gods 


100  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

is  influenced  by  shamans  because  they  can  attribute  difficulty  to  these 
gods.  However,  most  troubles  are  attributed  to  household  gods — per- 
haps because  most  difficulties  strike  household  units — and  so  shamans 
are  less  vital  in  trends  of  worship  of  village  gods. 

Among  village  gods  there  are  differences  of  form  and  function  that 
are  worth  pointing  out  and  using  as  classificatory  criteria.4  The  classifi- 
cation used  here  is  arbitrary,  its  recommendation  being  that  it  permits 
orderly  presentation  and  comparison.  Two  village  gods,  Memendla 
and  Bhartwali,  are  comparable  to  household  gods  in  several  respects, 
and  so  they  can  be  grouped  to  form  a  class  of  "household-like"  village 
gods,  on  the  borderline  between  these  two  categories,  just  as  Nar  Singh 
and  Nag  Raja  are  household  gods  bearing  similarities  to  village  gods. 
These  two  village  gods  are  worshiped  to  avoid  or  counteract  difficulties 
which  they  may  inflict  on  the  village.  Like  household  gods  they  are 
respected  to  the  extent  that  they  are  thought  capable  of  inflicting  pun- 
ishment. Bhartwali  is  said  by  some  to  be  Bharat,  described  in  the 
Ramayana  as  the  brother  of  Ram,  who  is  an  incarnation  of  Vishnu. 
The  temple  keeper  for  Bhartwali  is  the  local  Brahmin  priest.  Memen- 
dia,  like  several  village  gods,  has  no  specific  temple  keeper. 

A  similar  god  is  Raghunath,  the  only  god  to  whom  a  real  temple 
building  is  dedicated  in  the  village.  He  is  worshiped  by  all  village  brides 
and  grooms,  at  the  time  of  their  wedding,  under  the  supervision  of  a 
Brahmin  priest  and  with  the  aid  of  the  Rajput  temple  keeper  whose 
family  built  the  temple  three  or  four  generations  ago.  The  god  is  also 
worshiped  by  the  entire  village  at  the  crop  ceremony  and  at  almost  any 
ceremony  honoring  village  gods.  Like  the  paramount  gods  described 
below,  he  is  likely  to  dance  in  the  body  of  a  particular  person — in  his 
case  a  Rajput  woman — at  village-wide  kalratras.  In  addition,  Raghu- 
nath inflicts  punishment  on  particular  households.  Two  Rajput  house- 
holds worship  him  at  the  temple  in  a  fashion  and  under  circumstances 
similar  to  those  under  which  a  household  god  is  worshiped.  He  is  the 
most  dangerous  village  god  and  is  among  the  most  powerful.  It  appears 
that  he  is  becoming  one  of  the  paramount  gods  of  the  village.  A  few 
villagers  identify  him  with  Shiva,  but  in  the  region  he  is  usually  iden- 
tified as  the  grandfather  of  Ram,  an  incarnation  of  Vishnu.  Another  of 
Vishnu's  incarnations  (Parasii  Ram)  is  said  to  be  separately  depicted 
in  the  Raghunath  temple.  Bhairu,  a  god  associated  with  Shiva,  is  also 
said  to  be  represented  in  this  temple. 

One  village  god,  Lhesania,  is  specific  to  an  age  group,  children.  He  is 
associated  with  the  coming  of  spring  and  is  honored  at  that  time  by 
children.  He  is  not  feared  because  he  does  not  inflict  punishment. 
Two  village  gods  are  primarily  associated  with  agriculture,  crops, 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  101 

and  weather.  These  are  Matri,  evidently  a  form  of  mother  goddess,  and 
Bhula,  god  of  the  soil.  They  are  worshiped  to  ensure  success  in  agricul- 
ture, often  in  ceremonies  including  offerings  to  both  of  them  as  well 
as  to  Devi  or  other  village  gods. 

Two  village  gods,  Devi  and  the  Pandavas,  are  paramount  in  Sir- 
kanda,  in  that  they  are  distinctly  more  highly  regarded  by  most  villagers 
than  are  other  gods.  They  are  worshiped  on  a  wide  variety  of  occasions 
for  many  purposes,  and  their  worship  is  of  more  general  interest  than 
that  of  other  gods.  Together  they  receive  village-wide  worship  at  most 
important  ceremonies.  They  are  appealed  to  in  times  of  village-wide 
trouble  and  are  honored  to  ensure  success  or  good  fortune  in  the  village. 
They  are  thought  of  primarily  as  protectors  who  deserve  honor  rather 
than  tormentors  who  must  be  placated.  These  gods  are  thought  to  take 
a  special  interest  in  Sirkanda  and  its  people,  and  to  have  had  a  par- 
ticularly intimate  association  with  it  in  the  past.  Consequently, 
the  villagers  feel  closely  identified  with  them.  Part  of  being  a  Sir- 
kanda villager,  as  distinguished  from  being  a  member  of  another  vil- 
lage, is  this  identification  which  cuts  across  all  other  divisions  within 
the  village.  At  the  same  time,  these  gods'  relationships  to  individuals 
and  families  in  the  village  are  usually  not  as  specific  and  personal  as 
those  of  household  gods.  They  are,  to  a  greater  extent  than  other  gods, 
identified  with  the  welfare  of  the  entire  village.  In  some  contexts  they 
are  even  identified  with  broader  entities  such  as  the  residents  of  Bhat- 
bair,  or  Paharis,  or  even  mankind.  They  are  more  closely  identifiable 
with  "all-India  Hinduism"  than  are  most  gods  of  this  region. 

Devi  is  a  local  version  of  the  Hindu  mother  goddess,  Durga.  A  temple 
to  her,  15  miles  to  the  northeast,  is  the  most  important  temple  in  west- 
ern Tehri  Garhwal.  She  is  honored  in  a  small  temple  in  Sirkanda  as  a 
sort  of  village  patroness.  She  dances  in  the  body  of  a  village  woman  at 
nearly  all  occasions  of  worship  of  village  gods  and  assumes  special 
significance  in  ceremonies  having  to  do  with  the  crops  and  weather. 
Such  ceremonies  are  carried  out  at  her  temple.  She  therefore  forms 
something  of  a  link  between  "agricultural"  and  "paramount"  village 
gods.  She  traditionally  possesses  the  barber's  wife  at  public  ceremonies. 
The  barber's  family  now  worships  her  as  a  household  god,  in  their 
home. 

Sltala  Devi,  the  smallpox  goddess  of  the  plains,  is  known  to  Sir- 
kanda villagers,  but  no  shrine  or  worship  in  her  honor  is  found  in  the 
area,  perhaps  because  smallpox  is  rare  and  of  little  interest  to  people 
in  these  hills.  Apparently  she  is  assimilated  with  Devi  in  the  minds  of 
villagers. 

The  most  honored  deities  or  complex  of  deities  in  Sirkanda,  and  as 


102  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

important  as  Devi  in  Bhatbair  and  the  surrounding  Pahari  area,  are 
the  five  Pandava  brothers  and  their  common  wife  Draupadi  (locally 
Dropt'i),  whose  story  is  told  in  the  Hindu  religious  epic  Mahabharata 
where  they  are  described  as  having  lived  in  these  very  hills.  Every 
village  of  the  area  has  its  shrine  to  the  Pandavas.  Adjacent  to  this  shrine 
is  the  village's  ceremonial  center,  a  small  open  area  called  maDan 
(in  Hindi,  maidan,  field)  but  frequently  described  by  village  folk 
etymology  as  mdndn  from  the  verb  "to  please,"  "because  that  is  where 
we  please  the  gods."  Here  most  village  dances  and  public  ceremonies 
are  held  and  here  all  village  gods  take  the  opportunity  to  dance  in  the 
bodies  of  their  worshipers,  but  the  Pandavas  are  the  gods  most  directly 
honored  at  the  madan.  The  Pandavas'  puja  is  the  most  important  vil- 
lage ceremony.  It  comprises  part  of  almost  all  village  religious  activities, 
including  the  all-important  village  protection  and  boundary  rite  known 
as  Mundklle.  This  ceremony  is  devoted  to  worship  of  the  Pandavas 
and  a  number  of  other  village  gods,  prominent  among  whom  is  Devi. 
Its  immediate  aim  is  to  protect  the  village  as  an  entity  by  excluding 
malevolent  ghosts  and  alien  gods  from  its  boundaries.  (For  a  more  de- 
tailed description  see  Appendix  IIIB.)  It  is  usually  financed  by  village 
subscription,  though  in  some  circumstances  a  well-to-do  family  may 
sponsor  it.  In  any  case  participation  and  benefit  is  village-wide.  Al- 
though most  village  gods  play  a  part  in  the  ceremony,  it  is  considered 
by  villagers  to  be  primarily  for  the  Pandavas.  In  it  we  find  evidence  of 
the  interrelation  of  village  gods  and  of  their  distinctness  from  house- 
hold gods.  Household  gods  do  not  appear  during  this  ceremony.  In 
face,  they  do  not  appear  at  all  during  worship  of  village  gods,  although 
the  reverse  occasionally  happens.  Not  infrequently  one  household  god 
appears  during  the  worship  of  another,  just  as  village  gods  appear  at 
one  another's  pujas. 

A  god  of  importance  comparable  to  Devi  and  the  Pandavas  in  this 
area,  but  not  in  Sirkanda  village,  is  Mahdsii.  This  god,  often  identified 
as  Mahddev  or  Shiva,  but  distinct  from  Shiva  in  the  minds  of  most 
villagers,  is  the  paramount  god  in  some  neighboring  villages  (cf.  Sak- 
sena,  1955,  pp.  40  ff.).  Mahadev,  whether  equated  to  Mahasu  or  not,  is 
consistently  identified  with  Shiva,  and  like  Mahasu  is  a  major  god  in 
the  area.  He  is  worshiped  in  a  number  of  ceremonies,  the  most  elaborate 
of  which  is  the  spectacular  rope-sliding  feat  peculiar  to  the  Himalayas 
and  known  as  beddRat  (cf.  Berreman,  1961b).  When  this  is  performed 
in  the  region,  Sirkanda  villagers  attend  and  seek  the  blessing  of  the 
god  (and  his  wife  Pdrbatl),  even  though  they  do  not  worship  him. 

It  is  important  to  note  that  there  is  wide  variation  among  villagers 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  IO3 

in  interpretation,  practice,  and  reported  practice  in  all  ceremonies, 
the  more  so  the  more  complex  they  are.  The  ceremonial  sequence, 
number  of  sacrifices,  and  alleged  objectives  are  not  consistent.  This 
variation  was  especially  evident  in  the  Mundkile  ceremony,  where 
even  the  participants  differed  in  their  explanations  of  what  was  going 
on  (cf.  Marriott,  1955a). 

Pilgrimage 

Pilgrimages  are  frequently  undertaken  for  reasons  similar  to  those 
motivating  worship  of  village  or  household  gods.  A  person  suffers  from 
some  trouble  or  disease  such  as,  in  one  recent  case,  weeping  ulcers.  A 
shaman  is  consulted  and  advises  the  sufferer  to  worship  at  a  particular 
holy  place,  in  this  case  Kedarnath.  The  person  vows  to  do  so  and  sac- 
rifices a  goat  to  his  god,  whereupon  he  recovers.  At  the  first  opportu- 
nity he  undertakes  the  journey  to  fulfill  the  vow.  People  also  go  merely 
to  see  the  temple  or  to  give  charity  there  in  order  to  attain  credit  to- 
ward the  next  life.  A  number  of  middle-aged  high-caste  men  of  Sir- 
kanda  have  been  on  pilgrimages  to  Hardwar,  Kedarnath,  Badrinath, 
and  a  few  to  distant  Gaya.  At  least  one  woman  and  one  low-caste  man 
have  been  to  Badrinath.  Many  tales  of  the  wonders  of  these  holy  places 
and  the  miracles  which  regularly  occur  at  them  are  current  in  the  vil- 
lage as  the  result  of  reports  brought  back  by  pilgrims  or  traveling 
ascetics  and  priests.  The  fewer  villagers  who  have  seen  a  place,  the  more 
numerous  and  amazing  are  the  stories.  Many  villagers — about  twenty- 
five  men — have  been  to  Hardwar  to  bathe  in  the  Ganges  or  attend 
funeral  rites,  and  there  is  relatively  little  lore  about  it,  but  there  are 
many  stories  of  the  wonders  of  remote  Kedarnath. 

Equally  current,  among  low-caste  people,  are  the  stories  of  discrim- 
ination, disappointment,  and  denial  of  access  to  these  places  experi- 
enced by  their  caste-fellows  who  have  made  the  trip,  despite  official 
denial  of  such  practices.  The  one  village  blacksmith  who  had  gone  to 
Kedarnath  nonplussed  the  priests  by  his  presence  (fellow  pilgrims  had 
complained)  and  was  not  allowed  access  to  the  temple.  Eventually  he 
was  shown  the  temple  padlock  and  told  to  worship  that. 

Closer  and  less  prominent  temples  such  as  that  to  Devi  at  Kuddu 
Kal  and  several  in  nearby  sections  of  the  valley  are  occasionally  visited 
in  order  to  fulfill  vows  or  contribute  charity.  Caste  discrimination  at 
these,  as  in  fact  at  the  Raghunath  temple  in  Sirkanda,  is  as  strict  as  at 
the  large  and  famous  shrines.  Post-Independence  laws  and  pronounce- 
ments regarding  nondiscrimination  in  access  to  temples  have  been  un- 
enforced and  totally  ignored  in  this  part  of  India. 


104 


THE    SUPERNATURAL 


Gods  of  the  Great  Tradition 

Concepts  and  deities  contained  in  the  great  religious  literature  of 
India  are  known  to  Sirkanda  villagers  as  a  result  of  their  own  tra- 
ditions and  of  outside  contacts.  Traveling  priests  and  ascetics  occasion- 
ally stop  in  the  village  and  recite  religious  works  and  stories.  Residents 
of  the  village  occasionally  attend  religious  celebrations  such  as  Ram 
Lila,  the  annual  dramatization  of  the  religious  epic,  Ramayana,  which 
is  held  in  towns  and  villages  of  the  valley.  They  also  attend  fairs, 
moving  pictures,  and  ceremonies  held  in  the  larger  centers.  Much  of 
the  knowledge  so  acquired  does  not  readily  penetrate  into  the  daily 
thought  and  action  of  these  people  because  of  the  imperfect  manner 
in  which  it  is  communicated  and  the  alien  context  in  which  it  is  ac- 
quired. Among  Paharis,  plains  (desi)  beliefs  and  practices  are  often 
considered  sophisticated  and  even  worthy  of  emulation,  but,  as  they 
are  observed  in  casual  contacts  with  plains  people,  they  usually  seem 
alien  and  inapplicable  to  the  Pahari  context.  More  potent  sources  of 
such  knowledge  are  the  local  schoolteacher,  villagers  who  have  gone 
to  school  outside  the  village,  and  especially  practicing  Pahari  Brahmins, 
all  of  whom  communicate  plains  Hinduism  in  a  Pahari  idiom. 

There  are  devout  and  learned  Brahmins  in  Tehri  Garhwal,  among 
them  Har  Nam,  who  counts  most  high-caste  Sirkanda  households 
among  his  clients.  Such  Brahmins  read  standard  Sanskritic  Hindu 
literature  and  utilize  the  standard  procedures  described  therein  in  their 
ceremonial  duties.  In  some  areas  they  have  reportedly  contributed  to  a 
high  degree  of  emulation  of  plains  Hinduism.  Har  Nam,  on  his  visits 
to  Sirkanda,  is  without  doubt  the  most  vocal  advocate  of  plains  Hindu- 
ism in  the  village.  The  influence  of  such  people  in  Sirkanda  has  been 
insufficient  to  alter  significantly  many  of  the  basic  beliefs  or  practices 
of  villagers,  but  they  have  not  been  without  effect.  Superficial  famil- 
iarity with  certain  deities  and  concepts  identifiable  with  the  "great 
tradition"  but  alien  to  the  hills  has  resulted  from  the  influence  of  these 
Brahmins,  among  others.  Its  superficiality  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that 
many  of  these  deities  and  concepts  are  not  integrated  into  the  religious 
life  of  the  village  or  region. 

On  the  other  hand,  some  aspects  of  the  great  tradition  are  an  old 
and  integral  part  of  Pahari  Hinduism.  The  story  of  the  Mahabharata, 
including  especially  the  Pandava  brothers  and  their  wife,  their  allies, 
and  their  enemies,  is  an  example.  The  god  Shiva,  relatively  recent  in 
Hinduism  but  now  universal,  may  even  have  originated  as  a  Pahari 
god.  Belief  in  fate  and  reincarnation,  practice  of  certain  annual  and 
life  cycle  ceremonies,  and  many  other  religious  features  could  extend 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  IO5 

this  list.  Many  of  these  great  traditional  elements  are  as  old  as  Pahari 
culture,  which  like  all  cultures  is  constantly  changing  and  adding  ele- 
ments. In  any  case  they  confirm  the  Hinduism  of  these  people  and 
their  ancestors,  but  they  do  not  alter  the  fact  of  its  regional  distinctive- 
ness nor  the  significance  of  its  deviations  from  plains  orthodoxy. 

Beliefs  and  knowledge  of  such  aspects  of  the  great  tradition  as  cos- 
mology and  the  origin  of  man  and  the  universe  vary  with  the  experience 
of  individuals.  Broadly  they  conform  to  ideas  held  by  village  Hindus 
elsewhere  in  India.  Some  village  Brahmins  have  read  or  heard  religious 
works  and  the  explanations  given  therein.  People  who  have  attended 
schools  have  heard  the  teachers'  explanations,  which  are  likewise  based 
upon  the  great  tradition,  with  a  smattering  of  Western  science.  Every- 
one has  heard  Brahmins  or  others  give  various  explanations  along  these 
lines.  Most  villagers,  however,  simply  have  no  consistent  or  fixed  opin- 
ions on  these  subjects.  If  asked  they  will  repeat  stories  they  have  heard 
which  are  widespread  in  India,  such  as  that  the  earth  was  created  when 
an  egg  broke  in  half  forming  the  earth  from  one  half  and  the  sky  from 
the  other,  and  that  the  earth  is  held  on  the  horns  of  an  ox.  The  prob- 
lem is  apparently  not  relevant  to  most  villagers. 

It  is  possible  to  identify  among  the  deities  of  local  significance  in 
Sirkanda  evidence  of  relationship  to  prominent  gods  in  the  literary 
tradition  of  Hinduism.  These  relationships  are  often  vague,  sometimes 
not  extending  beyond  the  similarity  of  name  or  form.  To  many  villagers 
such  relationships  are  largely  or  totally  unknown,  while  to  others, 
though  known,  they  are  ignored  or  their  significance  is  virtually  nil. 
To  educated  people  and  especially  to  practicing  priests  these  relation- 
ships are  known  and  often  magnified.  The  trend  toward  emulation  of 
plains  Hindus  and  the  attendant  self-consciousness  about  local  tra- 
dition on  the  part  of  educated  people  leads  to  the  adoption  of  explana- 
tions for  local  beliefs  and  practices  in  terms  of  all-India  and  regional 
Hinduism  where  these  probably  did  not  previously  exist  and  are  un- 
recognized by  most  of  the  people. 

Four  or  five  high-caste  families  in  Sirkanda  are  alleged  to  own  copies 
of  one  or  more  classic  religious  works,  but  they  read  these  rarely  if  at 
all  and  none  of  them  holds  regular  readings  or  worship.  No  Sirkanda 
family  has  religious  pictures  or  objects  other  than  shrines  to  local  gods. 
The  traditional  Brahmin  or  purohit  for  the  village  (who  lives  in 
another  village)  does  possess  religious  pictures  representing  gods  of 
the  great  literary  tradition,  but  he  pays  little  attention  to  them  or  to 
their  meaning. 

The  effect  of  educated  Brahmins  is  greatest  in  the  conspicuous  as- 
pects of  plains  Hinduism — in  getting  villagers  to  Sanskritize  their  cere- 


106  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

monies,  particularly  the  marriage  ceremony,  and  to  observe  some  of 
the  periodic  all-India  festivals.  At  the  same  time  they  have  achieved 
some  success  in  getting  these  Paharis  to  conceal  some  of  their  more 
flagrantly  non-Sanskritic  practices  from  outsiders,  by  communicating 
to  them  most  of  the  responses  and  behaviors  necessary  to  gain  the  ap- 
proval of  plains  Hindus.  There  is  a  general  self-conscious  reluctance 
among  many  Paharis,  especially  those  of  high  caste,  to  discuss  their 
ritual  and  religious  practices,  their  marital  regulations,  and  so  on,  and 
a  tendency  to  present  these  as  being  closer  to  Hindu  orthodoxy  than 
they  actually  are.  Here  acceptability  by  high-caste  non-Paharis  and 
educated  Paharis  has  been  a  major  goal,  and  sophisticated  Brahmins 
have  been  among  its  most  active  advocates.  They  have  attempted  to 
counteract  the  derisive  connotation  which  the  term  "Pahari"  and  es- 
pecially "Pahari  Brahmin"  holds  for  many  non-Pahari  Hindus.  It  is 
toward  the  same  goal  that  educated  and  prominent  Paharis  are  striving 
when  they  recall  and  extol  the  sacred  heritage  of  the  high-caste  hill 
people  of  this  area.  For  these  purposes  conspicuous  aspects  of  practice 
are  more  important  than  subtle  aspects  of  belief.  The  religious  and 
social  changes  in  Sirkanda  have  been  in  the  direction  of  the  efforts  of 
those  who  wish  to  bring  about  more  of  these  outward  changes. 
Crooke  refers  to  the  all-India  spread  of  this  process: 

If  the  chief  of  a  forest  tribe  becomes  for  the  sake  of  respectability  an 
orthodox  Hindu,  he  brings  with  him  his  tribal  or  village  god,  who  becomes 
an  incarnation  of  Vishnu  or  a  manifestation  of  Siva.  If  a  village  shrine  gains 
a  reputation  for  miraculous  cures  of  spirit  diseases  ...  by  and  by  a  Brahman 
or  an  ascetic  takes  possession  of  it  as  a  working  concern,  and  develops  it  ac- 
cording to  orthodox  rule.  (Crooke,  1926,  p.  28) 

Srinivas  (1956)  is  among  those  who  have  made  the  same  point: 

Each  region  has  its  own  body  of  folklore  about  the  heroes  of  the  Ramayana 
and  Mahabharata  and  not  infrequently,  epic  incidents  and  characters  are 
related  to  outstanding  features  of  local  geography.  And  in  every  part  of  India 
are  to  be  found  Brahmins  who  worship  the  local  deities  which  preside  over 
epidemics,  cattle,  children's  lives,  and  crops,  besides  the  great  gods  of  all- 
India  Hinduism.  .  .  .  Throughout  Indian  history  Sanskritic  Hinduism  has 
absorbed  local  and  folk  elements  and  their  presence  makes  easier  the  further 
absorption  of  similar  elements.  The  absorption  is  done  in  such  a  way  that 
there  is  a  continuity  between  the  folk  and  the  theological  or  philosophical 
levels,  and  this  makes  possible  both  the  gradual  transformation  of  the  folk 
layer  as  well  as  the  "vulgarization"  of  the  theological  layer.  (Srinivas,  1956, 
P-  494) 

Here  some  of  the  apparent  ties  between  beliefs  and  practices  in  Sir- 
kanda as  compared  to  those  found  over  part  or  all  of  India  and  in  the 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  107 

literary  tradition  will  be  mentioned.  The  village  gods  of  Sirkanda  show 
closer  affinities  to  gods  of  the  great  tradition  than  do  household  gods, 
and  so  they  will  be  discussed  first  in  this  context. 

The  Bhartwali  shrine  in  Sirkanda  is  said  by  some  informants  to  be 
in  honor  of  Bharat,  brother  of  Rama  in  the  Ramayana  epic.  Kali,  who 
possesses  a  low-caste  woman  during  kalratras  to  village  gods  in  Sirkanda, 
is  the  same  in  name  as  the  Kali  who  is  prominent  in  Hinduism  as  a 
deification  of  femaleness.  In  Sirkanda  she  is  not  so  identified.  Devi  is 
apparently  also  a  manifestation  of  the  mother  goddess  and  particularly 
the  goddess  known  as  Durga,  who  is  popular  in  the  hills  as  well  as 
elsewhere.  She  is  represented  by  Sirkanda  informants  as  riding  a  tiger, 
the  characteristic  vehicle  of  Durga. 

Raghunath  is  identified  by  some  in  Sirkanda  as  Mahasu  or  Mahadev, 
generally  described  as  other  names  for  Shiva,  one  of  the  three  great  gods 
of  Hinduism.  In  Kumaon,  Raghunath  is  identified  as  Vishnu,  another 
of  this  trinity  (Atkinson,  1884a,  p.  813).  In  Sirkanda  this  deity  is  as- 
sociated with  Parasu  Ram,  an  incarnation  of  Vishnu  whose  image  is 
in  the  Raghunath  temple.  Shiva  as  represented  in  prominent  temples 
is  occasionally  worshiped  by  Sirkanda  people,  and  the  commemoration 
of  his  birth  is  one  of  the  Hindu  festivals  recognized  in  Sirkanda.  Some 
historians  of  Garhwal  believe  that  Shiva  as  an  all-India  deity  originated 
in  the  beliefs  of  the  aboriginal  inhabitants  of  this  area.  (Cf.  Bahadur, 
1916,  pp.  73  f.)  These  are  deities  worshiped  in  Sirkanda  which  are  di- 
rectly identifiable  with  gods  of  the  great  literary  tradition. 

Two  household  gods  have  tenuous  ties  of  this  type:  Nar  Singh  is  the 
name  of  an  incarnation  of  Vishnu,  and  temples  are  devoted  to  him  in 
Garhwal.  In  Sirkanda,  however,  he  is  a  household  god.  As  such  he  is 
found  throughout  this  region  and  is  also  reported  for  the  hill  region 
of  Chamba  (Crooke,  1926,  p.  201).  Nag  Raja,  the  snake  king,  has  a 
Shiva  temple  dedicated  to  him  elsewhere  in  Garhwal  (Atkinson,  1884a, 
p.  811).  ".  .  .  We  have  numerous  traces  of  Naga  worship  in  these  hills, 
but  now  chiefly  connected  with  the  special  cult  of  Vishnu  or  [less  fre- 
quently] Siva"  (Atkinson,  1884a,  p.  835).  Worship  of  this  deity  is  non- 
Brahmanical  in  origin  and  is  thought  to  have  derived  from  the  religion 
of  the  Nagas,  a  non-Aryan  tribe  of  uncertain  affinities  and  wide  spread 
who  have  apparently  long  been  displaced  to  the  east  or  have  been  ab- 
sorbed in  the  later  populations  in  Garhwal  (cf.  Atkinson,  1884a,  pp. 
373  f.;  Crooke,  1926,  pp.  383  ff.).  In  Sirkanda,  Nag  Raja  is  a  household, 
or  at  most  a  village,  god. 

Paharis  are  generally  described  as  Shiva  worshipers,  but  in  Sirkanda 
deities  identifiable  with  Vishnu  are  more  prominent.  To  Sirkanda 
residents,  however,  these  affiliations  are  irrelevant  and  largely  unknown. 


108  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

To  them  each  is  a  deity  in  its  own  right,  and  none  overshadows  house- 
hold gods  in  their  relevance  to  daily  life. 

Notwithstanding  the  number  and  importance  of  the  more  orthodox  forms 
of  Vishnu  and  Siva  in  this  portion  of  the  Himalaya  the  non-Brahmanical 
deities  .  .  .  have  far  more  worshippers  and  are  more  constantly  addressed. 
.  .  .  The  common  resort  in  times  of  trouble  or  distress  is  Goril  .  .  .  and  the 
other  village  gods.  (Atkinson,  1884a,  p.  839) 

The  general  belief  of  Sirkanda  villagers  relative  to  the  great  tradi- 
tion of  Hinduism,  and  the  essence  of  their  responses  to  inquiries  de- 
signed to  bring  out  relationships  between  their  brand  of  village  Hindu- 
ism and  all-India  Hinduism,  were  summed  up  by  an  informant  who 
said,  "The  learned  people  know  all  those  things,  we  don't.  They  don't 
concern  us." 

The  term  "village  gods"  or  "local  gods"  as  applied  to  Indian  villages 
should  not  be  interpreted  as  meaning  that  these  gods  are  unique  to  the 
particular  village  in  which  they  are  found.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  like  most 
other  traits  of  culture  they  generally  occur  over  cultural-linguistic 
regions  of  fairly  broad  extent.  Those  that  originate  in  a  single  village, 
say  as  a  deified  ancestor,  are  likely  to  spread  to  others  as  their  fame 
spreads  and  as  they  accompany  brides  to  other  villages,  until  eventually 
their  origin  is  forgotten  or  in  dispute.  Most  of  the  non-Sanskritized 
deities,  village  and  household,  worshiped  in  Sirkanda  are  of  this  super- 
local  character.  "Goril  ...  if  we  judge  from  his  general  repute  and 
the  number  of  temples  to  his  name,  is  the  most  popular  of  all  deities 
worshipped  by  the  lower  classes  in  Kumaon"  (Atkinson,  1884a,  p.  821). 
A  birth  story  recorded  by  Atkinson  for  Gauril  is  different  but  vaguely 
similar  to  that  told  in  Sirkanda.  Kali,  who  is  a  manifestation  of  the 
"mother  goddess"  in  great  traditional  Hinduism  and  is  associated 
with  the  Pandavas  in  Sirkanda,  is  reported  by  Atkinson  (1884a,  pp. 
821  ff.)  in  that  story  as  the  mother  of  "Goril."  This  relationship  did  not 
appear  in  my  Sirkanda  materials.  Kalua,  brother  of  Gardevi  and  as- 
sociate of  Gauril  in  Sirkanda,  is  the  name  of  an  independent  deity  who, 
according  to  Atkinson,  originated  in  a  village  in  Garhwal  as  the  spirit 
of  a  murdered  man,  and  Masdn  (Appendix  I),  is  identified  as  a  demon 
who  inhabits  cremation  grounds.  Bhuia  is  well  known  in  villages 
throughout  northern  India  as  the  "tutelary  god  of  fields  and  boundaries, 
...  a  beneficent  deity  who  does  not  as  a  rule  force  his  worship  on  any- 
one by  possessing  them  or  injuring  them  or  their  crops"  (Atkinson, 
1884a,  p.  825;  cf.  Crooke,  1926,  pp.  87,  92). 

Mahasu  is  a  name  applied  to  a  group  of  four  regional  deities  in 
Jaunsar-Bawar  adjacent  to  Garhwal  (Saksena,  1955,  pp.  40  ff.;  Atkinson, 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  10g 

1884a,  pp.  836  ff.).  As  mentioned  above,  the  same  term  refers  to  a  single 
deity  sometimes  equated  to  Shiva  in  Sirkanda.  Reference  has  already 
been  made  to  various  regional  interpretations  of  Nar  Singh  and  Nag 
Raja.  Devi  shows  similar  variation.  Such  similarities,  variations,  dis- 
crepancies, and  identities  could  be  repeated  many  times  over  for  the 
other  deities  of  Sirkanda,  and  in  fact  for  those  of  villages  throughout 
India. 

Caste  and  Deities 

Religious  belief  and  practice  do  not  vary  significantly  by  caste 
in  Sirkanda.  No  caste  gods,  as  such,  are  worshiped.  Low  castes  do  not 
engage  in  unique  worship  or  hold  beliefs  that  offer  a  clue  to  their 
presumed  early  cultural  distinctiveness  from  the  higher  castes.  In  this 
Sirkanda  differs  markedly  from  plains  villages,  where  caste  differences 
in  religious  practice  are  pronounced  (cf.  P.  M.  Mahar,  1957;  Cohn, 
1954,  pp.  174  ff.;  Planalp,  1956).  Perhaps  the  absence  of  caste  distinc- 
tions in  Sirkanda's  religion  can  be  largely  attributed  to  the  relative 
lack  of  physical  and  social  isolation  of  castes.  We  have  noted,  however, 
that  certain  gods  tend  to  be  identified  with  certain  castes  in  Sirkanda. 
Informants  point  out  that  such  distinctions  are  most  likely  to  appear 
during  village  dances,  when  certain  gods  tend  to  possess  members  of 
certain  castes.  Thus,  Bhartwali,  if  he  were  to  appear,  would  allegedly 
possess  a  Brahmin,  Memendia  would  possess  a  Rajput  (though  he  has 
on  occasion  possessed  members  of  all  castes).  A  blacksmith  (Lohar) 
would  be  possessed  by  a  god  called  Kaludl  Lohar  if  it  appeared,  and  a 
Bajgi  would  be  possessed  by  Kali  Das.  In  practice  in  Sirkanda  the  last 
of  these  appears  regularly,  the  first  two  rarely,  and  Kalual  Lohar  not 
at  all. 

One  low-caste  informant  commented  that  the  gods  do  not  recognize 
caste  distinctions  and  they  never  punish  people  for  breaking  caste 
rules.  As  he  said,  "If  gods  were  caste-conscious  would  Devi,  who  is  such 
an  important  deity,  possess  the  barber's  wife?"  The  fact  that  high 
castes  are  apparently  somewhat  more  aware  of  Sanskritic  belief  and 
ritual  than  low  castes  seems  to  be  a  result  of  their  greater  contacts 
with  education  and  educated  people  rather  than  of  any  caste  heritage 
of  belief. 

Caste  discrimination  in  worship  has  been  mentioned  in  the  dis- 
cussion of  pilgrimages.  Discrimination  occurs  in  the  village  temples 
as  well  as  in  distant  ones.  At  festivals  and  marriages  low-caste  members 
receive  their  blessings  indirectly  from  the  Brahmin,  who  flicks  the 
vermilion  paste  onto  some  object  as,  for  example,  the  drum  of  a  Bajgi, 
and  it  is  then  applied  to  the  Bajgis'  foreheads  by  the  owner  of  the  drum. 


HO  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

Low  castes  perform  the  same  ceremonies  and  worship  as  high  castes, 
but  they  do  so  separately  or  indirectly  so  as  not  to  pollute  the  high-caste 
worshipers.  They  stand  outside  the  temple  to  worship  Raghunath,  but 
they  worship  him  as  devoutly  as  do  Brahmins  or  Rajputs. 


Ancestors 

The  spirits  of  deceased  people  may  evolve  into  gods  as  was  re- 
portedly the  case  with  Kalua  in  Kumaon  mentioned  above,  with  Happy 
Eye  in  Kishan  Garhi  (Marriott,  1955a,  pp.  212  f.),  and  Ghatal  Deo  in 
Rampur  (Lewis,  1958,  pp.  204  f.).  In  Sirkanda  such  spirits  occur  in  a 
form  closely  resembling  household  gods  in  behavior  and  demands. 
Some  of  these  might  conceivably  become  minor  gods — the  first  step  in 
"universalization"  or  elevation  to  super-local  status  (cf.  Marriott, 
!955a>  PP-  207  ff.). 

Such  spirits  occur  in  Sirkanda  as  rati,  the  spirit  of  a  deceased  male 
who  returns  to  torment  the  household  in  which  he  had  lived,  and 
hanthia,  the  spirit  of  a  female.  These  beings  are  identified  by  shamans 
and  are  worshiped  as  household  deities  by  the  households  they  afflict 
(see  Appendix  IC).  The  difference  is  that  only  one  household  worships 
each  of  these,  and  generally  after  a  generation  or  two  they  are  dropped. 

In  Sirkanda  there  are  currently  thirteen  of  these  ancestor  spirits 
which  afflict  a  total  of  eleven  households,  nine  of  which  are  Rajputs, 
one  a  barber,  and  one  a  Bajgi.  Eight  of  the  spirits  are  female.  The  re- 
lationship of  these  to  living  household  members  is  as  follows:  four, 
and  possibly  five,  are  wives  who  do  not  want  to  be  forgotten  by  their 
living  husbands,  two  are  mothers,  and  one  is  a  co-wife.  Of  the  five  male 
spirits,  three  are  father's  younger  brothers,  one  is  a  father,  and  one  a 
brother,  of  current  householders.  They  are  worshiped  in  a  manner  very 
similar  to  that  for  household  gods,  and  under  similar  circumstances. 

An  ancestral  spirit  that  has  virtually  become  a  devi  or  goddess  and 
is,  in  fact,  sometimes  referred  to  by  that  term,  is  that  of  a  village  wife 
who  committed  satl  (immolation  on  husband's  funeral  pyre).  After  the 
event  no  stone  or  monument  was  erected  in  her  honor.  People  of  the 
village  gradually  forgot  about  her  noble  act  and  failed  to  honor  her. 
After  some  time  the  family  of  the  woman  began  to  suffer  with  boils 
and  fevers,  and  their  cows  went  dry.  A  shaman  diagnosed  the  trouble 
as  being  due  to  neglect  of  the  sati.  Therefore  the  householders  built  a 
shrine  to  the  shaman's  specifications.  This  shrine  is  now  the  place  of 
worship  for  the  sati  spirit  or  devi.  So  far  its  use  has  been  limited  almost 
entirely  to  the  Rajput  sib  of  the  household  who  built  the  shrine,  but  it 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  111 

has  extended  within  the  sib  beyond  that  particular  household  and 
lineage.  It  seems  a  likely  candidate  for  a  village  goddess. 

All  recent  ancestors  in  each  household  are  worshiped  in  an  annual 
ceremony  {kanagat,  described  in  Appendix  II),  even  though  they  have 
in  no  way  afflicted  their  survivors. 


Ghosts 

A  variety  of  ghosts  or  malevolent  spirits  inhabit  the  countryside, 
unassociated  with  any  one  family  or  even  any  one  village.  They  are 
usually  the  wandering  spirits  of  deceased  people  who  are  wont  to  at- 
tack living  people  with  results  ranging  from  death  to  luckless  fishing. 
In  general  these  ghosts  (bhuts)  or  demons  (shetanths)  attack  at  night 
and  in  dark  places.  Strange  or  unaccountable  sounds,  rock  slides,  and 
the  like  are  attributed  to  them.  None  inhabit  Sirkanda,  but  some  are 
known  to  inhabit  deep,  jungle-covered  ravines  on  trails  leading  into 
Sirkanda.  Whistling,  lights,  and  dislodged  stones  attributed  to  them 
are  frequently  encountered  at  night.  Fear  of  them  tends  to  keep  people 
from  traveling  at  night. 

The  worst  of  the  ghosts  come  to  people  and  enter  their  bodies  be- 
cause they  are  miserable  disembodied  souls  seeking  a  body  in  which  to 
dwell.  Others  are  jealous  of  human  beings,  or  merely  cantankerous. 
However,  possession  by  a  ghost  differs  from  that  by  a  god  or  ancestor. 
The  term  for  ghost  possession  is  bhut  lag  gea  (ghost  has  adhered)  or 
chat  patana  (to  cause  torment  as  evidenced  by  trembling),  as  con- 
trasted to  "sir  a  gea"  (has  come  to  a  head)  for  possession  by  a  god. 
Ghost  possession  is  qualitatively  different  from  possession  by  a  god. 
Once  a  ghost  has  "caught  hold"  it  will  usually  not  leave  unless  forced 
out  by  exorcism.  During  the  time  it  is  in  possession,  it  causes  illness, 
unusual  behavior,  and  even  death.  Insensitivity  to  pain  is  the  usual 
diagnostic  symptom  of  possession  by  a  ghost.  Other  afflictions  are:  eyes 
rolled  back,  fever,  inability  to  talk  coherently,  melancholia,  some  sen- 
sory disability  or  aphasia,  catatonic  adherence  to  a  particular  posture, 
illness,  barrenness,  or  repeated  stillbirths.  Sometimes  these  afflictions 
may  prove  incurable  because  the  ghost  cannot  be  exorcised.  Inexpli- 
cable sudden  death  is  often  attributed  to  ghosts.  The  very  fact  of  pos- 
session by  a  ghost  is  harmful  to  the  one  possessed.  A  god,  in  contrast, 
bothers  his  victim  without  possessing  him.  He  possesses  only  to  dance  or 
to  speak.  He  does  so  temporarily  without  harm  to  the  one  possessed, 
and  he  leaves  voluntarily. 

Ghosts  do  not  attack  as  punishment  for  misdeeds  or  oversights,  and 


112  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

they  are  not  usually  propitiated.  They  are  avoided  by  means  of  charms, 
magical  acts,  or  use  of  objects  inimical  to  them.  Once  possession  has 
occurred,  they  are  driven  out  with  the  help  of  a  professional  exorcist 
who  knows  what  will  send  them  away.  A  few  require  sacrifice  as  ran- 
som before  departing,  but  this  is  not  considered  to  be  propitiatory 
sacrifice  in  the  sense  of  an  offering  such  as  is  given  to  the  gods.  People 
simply  pay  off  an  evil  spirit.  There  is  no  feeling  of  guilt  or  laxity,  as 
they  cannot  avoid  such  spirits  by  worship  in  advance. 

Usually  a  shaman  diagnoses  possession  by  a  ghost  and  refers  the  pa- 
tient to  an  expert  in  exorcism.  Practitioners  who  exorcise  ghosts  can 
often  do  so  simply  by  chanting  appropriate  mantras  and  placing  a 
sacred  mark  on  the  victim's  forehead.  The  ghost  cannot  face  such  sa- 
credness  and  must  leave.  Some  ghosts  leave  under  physical  duress  such 
as  the  application  of  a  scorpion  plant  to  the  body,  a  mild  beating,  or 
blessed  grain  thrown  in  the  face  of  its  victim.  Some  require  very  com- 
plex rites  of  exorcism.  Some  can  be  exorcised  only  at  certain  places, 
for  example,  by  running  water,  at  a  cremation  ground,  at  a  crossroads 
where  a  goat's  or  sheep's  head  has  been  buried.  Some  can  be  warded 
off  by  specific  objects,  words,  or  written  formulas.  Iron,  black  color,  and 
scorpion  plant  are  anathema  to  most  ghosts. 

In  appearance  and  effect  as  well  as  susceptibility  to  various  types  of 
exorcism,  ghosts  vary.  All  or  nearly  all  have  backward-turned  feet  and 
long  fangs  if  they  have  human  form.  Some  take  the  form  of  snakes  or 
other  animals;  one  looks  like  a  white  pillar,  another  like  a  bright  light. 
They  are  adept  at  disguise.  Some  are  prone  to  attack  women,  one  at- 
tacks new  mothers,  another  attacks  men  wearing  blankets.  Cremation 
grounds  are  populated  by  many  ghosts — those  of  the  recently  dead, 
those  which  torment  the  souls  of  the  dead,  and  those  which  feed  on 
corpses.  It  is  often  remarked  in  Sirkanda  that  it  is  really  ghosts  rather 
than  flames  which  consume  the  corpse. 

Special  precautions  are  taken  at  cremation  to  ensure  that  nothing  of 
the  body  remains  for  ghosts  to  use  or  torment  sexually  or  otherwise, 
and  to  ensure  that  the  spirit  of  the  deceased  will  not  be  bothered  by 
other  ghosts.  The  spirit  of  a  dead  person  wanders  for  at  least  thirteen 
days  after  cremation.  No  matter  how  well-loved  the  person  was  in  life, 
his  spirit  is  feared  in  the  village  until  after  the  thirteenth-day  ceremony, 
which  allows  it  to  settle  in  some  body  or  at  least  to  pass  into  a  less  rest- 
less condition.  A  new  mother  and  infant  are  especially  vulnerable  to  the 
jealous  ghosts  of  women  who  died  in  childbirth.  As  protection,  mothers 
carry  iron  sickles  and  black  blankets  when  they  go  out  and  leave  scor- 
pion plant  and  the  sickle  by  their  child  or  in  the  doorway  when  they 
are  at  home. 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  1 1 3 

In  discussing  ghosts  of  the  dead  and  ancestors,  it  is  worth  noting  that 
the  dead  who  return  to  torment  the  living  are  those  who  are  thought 
to  have  reason  to  be  angry  or  jealous.  They  are  usually  those  who  died 
prematurely  or  are  improperly  mourned.  A  deceased  wife  torments  her 
successor;  a  person  who  died  prematurely,  jealously  torments  the  liv- 
ing; a  woman  who  died  in  childbirth  attacks  young  mothers;  a  father 
whose  sons  failed  to  give  proper  charity  on  his  behalf  at  his  funeral 
suffers  in  the  afterlife  and  therefore  plagues  his  sons;  a  man  whose 
family  neglected  to  perform  the  thirteenth-day  ceremony  after  death 
cannot  enter  a  new  life,  and  so  disturbs  his  family;  a  woman  who 
brought  honor  to  her  family  by  immolating  herself  on  her  husband's 
funeral  pyre  torments  her  neglectful  descendants. 

Ghosts  are  often  categorized  terminologically  by  their  origin.  Thus 
chuRail  is  the  ghost  of  a  woman  who  died  in  childbirth,  and  shaiad  is 
the  ghost  of  a  Muslim.  Eight  named  ghosts  plus  a  number  of  unnamed 
ones  were  described  by  Sirkanda  men.  Some  of  these  are  well  known  in 
other  areas.  Crooke  (1926,  pp.  134,  171),  for  example,  describes  "churel" 
and  "shahid"  on  the  plains,  corresponding  to  the  two  types  mentioned 
immediately  above.  Others  are  doubtless  of  very  limited  distribution. 

Sprites 

One  category  of  supernatural  beings  differs  from  others  in  that 
their  effects  on  people  are  harmful  but  not  malicious.  These  are  the 
matriya  (matris)  or  sprites  associated  with  the  goddess  Matri,  mentioned 
above  and  representing  the  ghosts  of  little  girls.  They  live  around  the 
shrine  dedicated  to  Matri,  atop  the  hill  overlooking  Sirkanda,  and  their 
affinity  to  her  may  be  based  primarily  on  that  fact  (see  Appendix  IB). 
Sirkanda  villagers  think  of  them  as  a  band  of  fast-moving,  invisible, 
playful  fairies  who  occasionally  leave  their  normal  abode  on  the  hill- 
top to  flit  about  over  the  countryside  like  a  flock  of  birds  or  a  swarm  of 
insects.  If  a  person  happens  to  get  in  their  way  while  they  are  traveling 
or  cavorting,  he  will  be  struck  with  fatal  or  debilitating  maladies  such 
as  insanity,  blindness,  deafness,  muteness,  or  aphasia  of  various  sorts. 
Sudden  occurrences  of  such  disabilities,  without  warning  symptoms, 
are  often  attributed  to  these  beings.  The  effects  are  considered  incur- 
able, but  the  sprites  have  not  inflicted  them  as  punishment,  nor  is  it 
done  in  anger  or  spite.  It  is  simply  an  inevitable  result  of  happening 
into  the  midst  of  matris  at  play.  The  matris  are  capricious  and  without 
malice.  They  strike  people  in  passing  rather  than  possessing  them. 
Therefore,  they  cannot  be  propitiated  or  exorcised.  They  are  a  hazard 
to  human  beings — one  that  cannot  be  anticipated,  avoided,  or  cured. 


114  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

"He  just  got  in  the  way  of  the  matris;  it  was  his  fate,"  is  the  way  their 
afflictions  are  explained.  Fortunately,  the  chances  that  one  will  be 
struck  by  them  are  slim,  for  like  lightning  and  wild  animals  they  strike 
rarely  and  over  an  area  so  large  as  to  make  direct  contact  with  them 
unlikely.  Perhaps  one  out  of  each  thousand  Bhatbair  residents  has  been 
struck  by  matris. 

Their  nature  and  activities  are  very  similar  to  those  of  the  acheri 
or  fairies  described  by  Traill.  "These  reside  on  the  tops  of  mountains, 
but  descend  at  dusk  to  hold  their  revels  in  more  convenient  spots.  To 
fall  in  with  the  train,  at  the  time,  is  fatal  .  .  .  :  they  occasionally  also 
molest  those  who  may  cross  the  sites  of  their  abodes  during  the 
day  .  .  ."  (Traill,  1828,  p.  221;  cf.  Oakley,  1905,  pp.  212  f.). 

It  should  be  remembered  that  the  categories  of  supernatural  beings, 
such  as  sprites,  ghosts,  household  gods,  and  village  gods,  as  well  as  the 
subdivisions  of  these  categories,  are  not  entirely  distinct  and  in  practice 
constitute  a  continuum  or  spectrum  of  intergrading  types  of  super- 
natural beings  with  similarities  running  through  all.  When  informants 
recount  memorable  or  recent  instances  of  the  machinations  of  super- 
natural beings,  they  often  jump  from  one  type  to  another  and  back 
again  without  pause,  explanation,  or  even  identification  of  the  type  of 
supernatural  responsible.  On  the  other  hand,  inquiry  can  usually  pro- 
duce such  identification. 

Supernatural  Functionaries 

In  a  world  beset  by  such  a  variety  of  supernatural  troublemakers 
there  are  a  variety  of  professional  people  whose  job  it  is  to  deal  with 
them.  In  Bhatbair  these  can  be  categorized  according  to  the  functions 
they  perform,  as  priests,  temple  keepers,  shamans,  pujaris,  diviners, 
exorcists,  and  curers.  These  categories  are  not  necessarily  mutually 
exclusive. 

Priests  maintain  the  system  of  Hinduism  in  ways  prescribed  in  the 
great  tradition.  It  is  they  who  help  people  achieve  a  favorable  afterlife 
and  rebirth.  Their  primary  responsibility  is  the  long-range  welfare  of 
their  clients.  They  perform  the  annual  ceremonies  and  life-cycle 
rites  as  well  as  many  special  ceremonies.  In  addition  they  perform 
pujas  to  village  gods,  and  they  practice  astrology  and  some  forms 
of  divination  based  on  written  prescriptions  of  Hinduism.  They 
are  the  local  experts  on  the  great  tradition,  though  their  beliefs  and 
daily  practices  in  Bhatbair  do  not  differ  materially  from  those  of  other 
castes. 

Temple  keepers  maintain  particular  shrines  to  honor  gods,  receive 
gifts  on  their  behalf,  and  often  lead  or  assist  in  their  worship. 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  1 15 

The  other  supernatural  functionaries  deal  with  the  exigencies  of 
daily  life  relative  to  the  supernatural.  Their  primary  responsibility  is 
the  immediate  welfare  of  their  clients  in  this  life.  The  shaman  who 
diagnoses  difficulties  through  the  offices  of  his  own  personal  deity,  and 
the  pujari  who  performs  worship  for  household  gods  and  plays  drums 
to  let  the  gods  dance,  have  been  discussed  sufficiently  above  so  that  no 
elaboration  is  required  here  (cf.  Berreman,  1961a).  These  two  types  of 
functionaries  enable  people  to  find  out  what  deities  are  troubling  them 
and  how  to  appease  them.  The  pujaris  help  in  satisfying  the  deities' 
demands. 

With  regard  to  gods  worshiped  locally  we  can  say  that  Brahmin 
priests  are  to  village  gods  as  pujaris  are  to  household  gods;  that  is,  they 
perform  comparable  functions.  By  the  same  token,  temple  keepers  are 
to  the  gods  of  their  temples  as  household  heads  are  to  the  gods  of  their 
households;  they  maintain  the  shrines  and  supervise  the  worship, 
though  often  specialists  actually  perform  the  worship. 

Aside  from  these  there  are  a  variety  of  specialists  in  several  kinds  of 
supernatural  activities.  These  practitioners  range  from  the  lowliest 
shoemakers  to  Brahmins,  but  there  is  a  heavy  predominance  of  low 
castes.  Their  methods  vary  with  their  specialties,  their  place  of  origin, 
and  in  some  cases  their  personal  predilections.  Although  the  specialties 
are  not  hereditary,  the  practitioner  usually  derives  the  necessary  knowl- 
edge and  skill  from  a  parent  or  other  relative  who  practiced  before 
him  and  taught  him  the  necessary  lore. 

In  Sirkanda  there  are  two  such  practitioners,  both  Bajgis.  Each  rep- 
resents a  common  type  of  practitioner  in  the  area.  One  is  a  diviner. 
He  performs  much  the  same  function  as  a  shaman  in  that  he  diagnoses 
trouble  and  divines  the  past  and  future,  but  he  is  without  the  shaman's 
personal  god  as  his  source  of  information.  In  this  practice  he  uses  at 
least  two  techniques  of  gaining  insight,  one  involving  a  system  of 
counting  grains  of  rice  brought  to  him  by  a  client,  and  the  other  a 
system  of  reading  significance  in  patterns  of  drawn  lines.  The  second 
Sirkanda  practitioner  is  an  exorciser  of  ghosts  and  spirits.  This  man  is 
credited  with  several  impressive  successes.  He  is  especially  adept  at 
exorcism  of  ghosts  which  cause  stillbirths.  One  of  his  techniques  is 
that  of  jhdrd  tdrd  karnd  (to  do  brushing  away  of  evil),  a  term  applied 
to  the  magic  used  to  treat  cases  of  spiritually  caused  diseases  and  other 
difficulties.  He  is  sometimes  called  to  diagnose  and  treat  a  patient  as- 
sumed to  be  possessed  by  a  ghost.  More  often  he  is  called  as  a  result  of 
diagnosis  by  a  shaman  in  order  to  carry  out  exorcism. 

There  are  many  other  practitioners  of  similar  arts  in  neighboring 
areas.  In  a  distant  but  accessible  village  lives  a  Nepalese  Rajput  ex- 
orciser of  considerable  renown  and  spectacular  methods  who  brings 


Il6  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

ghosts  physically  into  his  clients'  terrified  presence  in  their  natural 
form  and  habitat  (at  the  cremation  grounds)  and  browbeats  them  into 
submission  to  his  will.  Like  well-known  specialists  in  many  cultures, 
his  services  do  not  come  cheaply  and  he  is  therefore  a  last  resort  in 
most  cases  of  ghost  possession. 

All  these  practitioners  serve  over  a  wide  geographical  area,  and  their 
practice  is  a  direct  reflection  of  their  reputation  for  success.  Rarely  are 
their  services  as  highly  valued  in  their  own  villages  as  in  distant  ones 
— an  instance  of  the  general  rule  in  these  hills  that  respect  for  a  prac- 
titioner who  deals  with  the  supernatural  varies  inversely  with  physical 
(and  sometimes  social)  proximity  to  him.  Typical  is  the  Sirkanda  Bajgi 
exorciser,  one  of  the  few  of  his  profession  able  to  make  a  living  without 
supplementing  his  income  by  following  a  trade,  making  liquor,  or 
engaging  in  agriculture.  He  is  patently  in  great  demand  in  other  vil- 
lages and  lives  as  well  as  many  other  villagers,  but  he  is  rarely  con- 
sulted in  Sirkanda.  A  villager  summed  up  local  opinion  when  asked 
his  estimate  of  this  practitioner's  skill:  "If  he  were  any  good  would 
he  live  here  in  poverty  as  he  does?"  Another  commented,  "Everyone 
has  to  make  a  living;  some  work,  some  beg,  some  steal;  he  does  exor- 
cising." Similar  attitudes  are  expressed  regarding  the  local  Brahmin 
priest  as  compared  to  more  distant  and  hence  more  respected  priests. 

Diseases  are  usually  considered  to  be  supernaturally  caused.  Diagnosis 
is  most  often  performed  by  a  shaman,  who  recomends  the  appropriate 
type  of  practitioner  and  treatment.  As  we  have  seen,  shamanism  is  a 
major  focus  of  religion  in  Sirkanda.  Some  common  diseases  are  thought 
to  be  amenable  to  direct  treatment  either  with  herbs  and  diets  or  with 
incantation  by  minor  specialists.  Those  who  treat  such  diseases  tend 
to  specialize  in  certain  diseases  or  groups  of  diseases.  Other  practi- 
tioners, like  the  Sirkanda  Brahmin,  will  treat  almost  any  ailment. 
Afflictions  characterized  by  some  external,  visible  symptom  such  as 
sores  or  swelling  (for  example,  boils,  gout,  mumps,  chicken  pox,  sore 
eyes,  snakebite,  and  spider  bite)  are  usually  treated  by  the  class  of 
specialists  called  jharnewala  (practitioner  of  jhama,  stroking  or  brush- 
ing). In  Bhatbair  there  is  a  specialist  for  each  of  the  above-named  ail- 
ments, and  for  most  of  them  there  is  a  specialist  in  Sirkanda  itself. 
Such  practitioners  may  be  men  of  any  caste  who  perform  this  duty 
when  called  upon  but  do  not  make  a  major  occupation  of  it.  Treat- 
ment varies  with  the  disease,  but  in  general  it  involves  recitation  of 
appropriate  mantras  by  the  practitioner  while  he  repeatedly  touches 
the  afflicted  member  and  the  ground  (or  water,  lump  of  sugar,  animal, 
or  other  object)  alternately  with  a  hawk's  feather,  thus  transferring  the 
trouble  from  the  patient  to  the  ground  or  object.  Smallpox  is  rare  in 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  1 17 

the  area,  but  if  it  occurred  would  be  treated  by  worshiping  the  deity 
to  whose  displeasure  it  was  attributed,  probably  Devi. 

As  previously  noted,  the  Sirkanda  Brahmin  practices  elementary 
Vedic  medicine.  In  this  practice  he  follows  a  book  of  instructions, 
based  upon  Hindu  religious  works,  which  directs  the  practitioner  in 
herbal,  dietary,  and  hot  and  cold  treatments,  as  well  as  others.  He  also 
practices  jharna. 

General  debility  or  lingering  illness  may  be  treated  by  giving  charity 
to  relieve  the  misery.  The  treatment,  under  the  direction  of  a  Brahmin, 
is  called  "weighing."  It  is  a  rather  elaborate  process  the  essence  of  which 
is  that  the  patient  is  balanced  in  a  large  scales  against  a  counterweight  of 
several  items,  primary  among  which  is  grain.  A  puja  is  performed,  the 
counterweight  goes  to  the  Brahmin  as  charity,  and  thereafter  the  ill- 
ness is  cured. 

Occasionally  Vedic  doctors  in  Mussoorie  or  Dehra  Dun  are  consulted 
to  set  bones  or  prescribe  for  diseases  such  as  tuberculosis,  malaria, 
venereal  disease,  chronic  dysentery,  general  weakness,  and  male  sexual 
difficulties.  Women  rarely  go  outside  the  village  for  treatment.  In 
serious  or  lingering  cases  a  variety  of  treatments  and  practitioners  may 
be  tried.  Some  minor  ailments  are  treated  in  the  home  without  the  ad- 
vice of  specialists,  either  with  traditional  folk  remedies  or  with  local 
interpretations  of  Vedic  prescriptions. 

Spell-Casting,  Witchcraft,  and  Evil  Eye 

Some  practitioners  of  curative  magic  and  occasionally  others  have 
learned  to  cast  spells  (jaddu)  into  people  that  will  cause  either  slow 
suffering  and  eventual  death  or  sudden  death,  depending  upon  the 
type  of  spell.  The  latter  is  more  difficult  and  the  method  is  a  closely 
guarded  secret,  while  the  former  is  well  known.  The  same  practitioners 
are  proficient  in  the  process  of  lautand,  "to  send  back"  or  counteract 
jaddu,  whereby  the  evil  spell  can  be  removed  and  returned  to  the 
sender  or  put  in  some  harmless  place.  Such  practitioners  are  supported 
by  the  god  Bhairu.  A  goat  is  sacrificed  to  the  god  as  part  of  the  prepa- 
ration for  sending  or  counteracting  a  spell.  There  have  been  Bajgi, 
Rajput,  and  Brahmin  practitioners  of  this  magic  in  Sirkanda.  In  ad- 
dition, there  is  a  lesser  form  of  jaddu  which  takes  the  form  of  practical 
jokes  which  inconvenience  or  make  ridiculous  their  victims.  This  type 
is  especially  common  among  Bajgis,  who  use  it  to  interfere  with  the 
drum-playing  of  their  rivals. 

Casting  of  spells  and  counterspells  is  a  very  precise  and  difficult  art. 
Slight  mistakes  in  the  ritual  can  result  in  the  death  of  the  practitioner, 


Il8  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

and  instances  are  readily  cited.  In  one  local  case  the  magically  treated 
pot  by  which  the  spell  was  to  be  conveyed  turned  upon  the  errant 
spell-caster  who  had  prepared  it  and  dispatched  him  with  a  blow  on 
the  skull.  Similarly,  misuse  can  be  the  doom  of  the  practitioner,  ac- 
cording to  a  belief  that  fatal  jaddu  must  be  used  only  on  those  who  de- 
serve death.  It  is  often  stated  that  anyone  who  learns  this  art  has  to 
pledge  his  teacher  never  to  use  it  irresponsibly  under  pain  of  dire 
punishment.  One  death  and  a  case  of  affliction  with  leprosy  in  the  fam- 
ily of  Tula,  the  traditional  Brahmin  of  Sirkanda,  are  attributed  to 
injudicious,  impulsive  use  of  fatal  jaddu  by  a  member  of  that  family 
on  an  innocent  Bajgi  victim. 

Jaddu  is  accomplished  by  a  combination  of  imitative  and  contagious 
magic.  A  flour-and-water  image  of  the  intended  victim  is  prepared  and 
placed  in  a  pot  along  with  various  rare  and  esoteric,  magically  treated 
items.  Incantations  are  recited  over  this,  and  pulses  (legumes)  are 
thrown  over  the  image  as  its  intended  fate  is  spelled  out.  Then  the  pot 
is  secretly  buried  in  the  home  of  the  intended  victim,  who  begins  to 
suffer  the  consequences.  The  source  of  the  victim's  trouble  is  usually 
diagnosed  for  him  by  a  shaman.  Then  a  practitioner — preferably  the 
one  who  cast  the  spell  in  the  first  place — is  called  in  at  considerable  ex- 
pense to  nullify  the  spell  by  a  special  performance  with  a  similar  con- 
tainer, or  redirect  it  by  finding  the  buried  container  so  that  it  can  be 
reburied  elsewhere. 

A  related  technique  of  spell-casting  is  magically  sending  flour 
and  water  images  of  the  victim  and  of  a  sheep  (the  latter  as  an 
offering  "to  the  art  of  jaddu")  to  the  victim  after  magical  preparation 
similar  to  that  exercised  upon  the  pot  in  the  above  description.  The 
images  are  made  to  walk  in  upon  the  victim  by  force  of  magic,  where- 
upon he  is  expected  to  drop  dead  of  fright.  This  spell  can  be  counter- 
acted by  a  practitioner  if  the  victim  survives  long  enough  to  summon 
one. 

Mantras  can  theoretically  be  recited  by  a  practitioner  over  the  nail 
and  hair  clippings  of  a  potential  victim  to  drive  him  insane  by  jaddu, 
but  fear  of  this  danger  is  not  sufficient  to  motivate  Sirkanda  people 
to  conceal  clippings.  Shamans  rarely  designate  clippings  as  the  source 
of  a  person's  trouble;  ghost  possession  or  contact  with  matris  are  the 
usual  diagnoses  of  such  symptoms.  Nail  and  hair  clippings  automati- 
cally cause  bad  dreams  if  left  in  a  house  and  will  cause  creaking  roof 
beams  if  placed  among  the  rafters  of  a  house.  In  such  cases  a  shaman 
can  diagnose  the  trouble  and  specify  where  the  offending  objects  can 
be  found. 

Dag,  witchcraft,  is  practiced  secretly  by  certain  women.  Other  hill 


I  I 


THE    SUPERNATURAL  1 1 9 

areas,  including  Jaunpur  and  Jaunsar-Bawar,  are  thought  to  abound 
in  witches,  so  that  girls  are  not  sent  there  as  wives  or  taken  from  there 
without  careful  advance  investigation.  Three  of  five  Sirkanda  girls 
who  were  married  in  Jaunpur  died  early,  allegedly  as  a  result  of  witch- 
craft. There  has  never  been  a  witch  in  Sirkanda  and  there  are  no  witches 
in  Bhatbair  now,  according  to  Sirkanda  people,  though  there  are  re- 
ported to  have  been  some  who  came  as  brides  from  time  to  time  in  the 
distant  past.  The  nearest  witch  now  lives  in  a  village  on  the  farthest 
periphery  of  the  area  within  which  Sirkanda  people  regularly  marry. 
Witchcraft  is  associated  with  people  who  are  different,  and  hence  mys- 
terious and  therefore  dangerous.  Witchcraft  is  a  reason  for  staying  away 
from  alien  people  and  areas  and  for  avoiding  unnecessary  interaction, 
especially  marriage,  with  distant  and  unknown  people. 

Witches  are  very  covetous.  They  insidiously  destroy  any  person, 
animal,  or  object  which  they  admire.  They  can  disguise  themselves  as 
cats  or  other  animals  to  gain  access  to  the  homes  of  their  victims. 
There  they  may  measure  the  victim  with  a  thread  or  eat  his  liver  or 
replace  it  with  another  object  without  leaving  a  trace.  As  a  result  the 
victim,  whether  human  or  animal,  will  die  a  miserable  death.  Some- 
times shoemakers  report  that  dead  cattle  are  found  to  have  had  no 
liver — a  sure  sign  of  dag.  There  is  no  countermagic  for  this  dread 
practice. 

The  "evil  eye"  (nazar  lagnd,  to  look  covetously)  is  well  known  over 
North  India  and  bears  some  superficial  resemblance  to  dag.  In  Sir- 
kanda, as  elsewhere,  the  evil  eye  consists  of  a  covetous,  greedy,  admir- 
ing, or  envious  look  cast  by  certain  persons  at  any  person,  animal,  or 
object.  The  result  is  that  the  object  of  the  evil  eye  is  harmed — the 
child  or  adult  becomes  weak  or  sickly,  the  cow  goes  dry,  the  artifact 
breaks.  The  possessor  of  the  evil  eye  is  usually  unaware  of  the  effect 
he  produces.  Not  all  people  possess  the  evil  eye,  and  those  who  do 
cannot  control  it.  It  is  not  restricted  to  any  particular  type  of  person. 
A  shaman  generally  diagnoses  the  trouble.  Specialists  prescribe  amulets 
or  short  ceremonies  to  dispel  its  effects.  However,  it  is  not  very  much 
feared  in  this  area,  and  is  rarely  blamed  for  trouble.  There  is  not,  as  a 
result  of  this  belief,  reluctance  to  have  a  child  admired  or  complimented 
in  any  way,  as  is  often  the  case  in  the  plains.  Neither  are  such  precau- 
tions as  eye-blackening  commonly  used  to  protect  children.  As  one  in- 
formant said, 

If  we  have  many  children  we  don't  fear  evil  eye  at  all.  If  we  have  only 
one  or  two  we  fear  it  and  we  protect  the  child  by  giving  extra  charity  and, 
if  necessary,  with  amulets.  We  like  to  have  our  children  admired  and  we 


120  THE    SUPERNATURAL 

don't  think  admiration  increases  the  likelihood  of  evil  eye.  It  is  counteracted 
by  charity  and  charms,  not  by  disguise. 

A  somewhat  related  concept  is  that  of  dux  lakshirii,  a  person  of  evil 
portent.  The  term  refers  especially  to  a  person  who  utters  curses  or 
dire  predictions  which  have  a  tendency  to  come  true.  If  a  person  uses 
a  common  curse  such  as  "I  hope  you  fall  and  skin  your  knees,"  and  it 
comes  true  regularly,  he  is  referred  to  by  this  term  and  is  feared. 

Certain  social  relationships  into  which  people  enter  prove  to  be  in- 
herently fortunate  or  unfortunate.  Most  frequently,  marriage  is  of  this 
nature.  Some  marriages  bring  a  marked  change  in  the  luck  or  fortune 
of  a  family.  The  change  is  attributed  to  the  new  relationship  and  more 
particularly  to  the  bride  since,  in  this  patrilocal  society,  she  is  the  new 
element  in  the  situation.  There  are  many  examples  of  Sirkanda  house- 
holds whose  luck  changed  from  bad  to  good  or  good  to  bad  immediately 
after  a  marriage.  Bad  luck  is  attributed  to  misread  or  mismatched 
horoscopes  of  the  married  couple  because,  if  properly  read,  the  horo- 
scopes would  have  predicted  the  difficulty  and  the  marriage  would 
not  have  been  performed. 

Similarly  the  birth  of  a  particular  child  may  prove  lucky  or  unlucky 
to  a  family.  Children  born  under  one  astrological  condition  (mul)  are 
so  dangerous  to  their  parents  that  they  are  usually  adopted  by  others, 
and  they  may  even  prove  to  be  harbingers  of  bad  luck  to  their  foster 
parents. 

There  is  in  Sirkanda  a  whole  series  of  auspicious  and  inauspicious 
omens,  days,  acts,  and  objects  with  corroborative  stories  about  people 
who  have  felt  their  effects  or  narrowly  missed  feeling  their  effects. 
These  need  not  be  enumerated  here.  Some  of  the  portents  are  based  on 
religious  writings  and  are  known  primarily  by  the  Brahmins  who 
consult  religious  works  and  astrological  tables  to  detect  them.  Others 
are  known  to  diviners  and  similar  practitioners.  Many  are  the  common 
knowledge  of  every  villager. 


4 


THE   RELIGIOUS   CONTEXT 
CALENDRICAL   AND 
LIFE-CYCLE   CEREMONIES 


A  number  of  recurrent  ceremonies  in  which  household  and  village  gods 
play  important  roles  have  been  mentioned.  In  this  chapter  two  cyclical 
patterns  of  ceremonial  observance  will  be  discussed.  The  first  of  these  is 
the  annual  cycle  of  festivals,  and  the  second  is  the  lifetime  cycle  of  rites 
of  passage — the  ritual  observance  of  changes  in  status  of  the  individ- 
ual. No  attempt  will  be  made  to  describe  these  observances  in  the 
vast  detail  that  would  be  necessary  in  order  to  reproduce  them.  Rather, 
their  main  outlines,  the  social  composition  of  groups  which  participate 
in  them,  and  their  points  of  difference  and  similarity  in  comparison 
with  equivalent  ceremonies  of  all-India  Hinduism  will  be  described. 
It  will  be  noted  that  no  daily  cycle  of  ritual  or  worship  is  described 
for  Sirkanda.  There  is  no  tradition  of  such  practice  in  this  village 
among  the  members  of  any  caste,  although  in  other  areas  of  the  hills 
high-caste  people  do  perform  daily  ceremonies  much  like  those  ob- 
served by  some  plains  groups  (cf.  Atkinson,  1884b,  p.  65).  In  Sirkanda 
one  middle-aged  Rajput  who  has  had  eight  years  of  schooling  and 
operates  the  village  shop  is  the  only  person  who  lays  claim  to  any  such 
practice,  and  he  says  only  a  brief  prayer  at  the  time  of  lighting  his  lamp 
in  the  evening.  A  few  high-caste  households  possess  religious  books 
but  do  not  read  them  regularly.  There  is  little  in  the  way  of  private, 
individual  worship  of  any  sort  in  the  village. 


122  CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

Calendrical  ceremonies  in  Sirkanda  are  observed  by  all  or  nearly 
all  community  members,  but  specific  ceremonial  activities  which  make 
up  the  calendrical  observances  are  carried  out  primarily  within  the 
household.  Life-cycle  ceremonies  are  performed  by  the  kin  group 
(usually  the  lineage)  but  are  carried  out  in  the  household  with  house- 
hold members  playing  the  most  important  roles.  The  household  there- 
fore is  the  basic  ritual  unit. 


Annual  Ceremonial  Cycle 

Twelve  ritual  observances  or  religious  ceremonies  are  celebrated 
annually  in  Sirkanda. 

Nine  of  these  (numbers  4-12  in  table  1)  are  local  manifestations  of 
widespread  Hindu  festivals,  two  of  which  (numbers  5  and  12)  are  given 
little  more  than  lip  service  in  Sirkanda.  Another  (number  9)  is  observed 
in  a  manner  very  different  from  its  observance  on  the  plains.  Three 
festivals  (numbers  1,  2,  and  3)  are  apparently  of  only  regional  signifi- 
cance. 

This  sequence  can  be  compared  with  the  calendrical  ceremonies  re- 
ported for  various  villages  of  the  plains:  12  are  reported  for  the  Chamar 
caste  of  Senapur  (Cohn,  1954,  pp.  200  ff.),  and  35  are  recorded  for  the 
entire  village  of  Senapur  (Planalp,  1956,  pp.  249  ff.).  Nineteen  each 
are  reported  for  Kishan  Garhi  (Marriott,  1955a,  pp.  191  ff.)  and  Ram- 
pur  (Lewis,  1958,  pp.  197  ff.). 

Marriott  notes  that  half  the  festivals  of  Kishan  Garhi  are  identifiable 
with  those  of  the  great  tradition.  In  making  this  comparison  he  makes 
certain  qualifications  that  must  be  borne  in  mind.  These  apply  equally 
well  to  other  North  Indian  Hindu  villages,  including  Sirkanda. 

.  .  .  The  presumption  that  the  festivals  of  Kishan  Garhi  are  approximately 
identical  with  those  of  the  great  tradition  needs  to  be  qualified  in  at  least 
four  ways.  These  four  qualifications  bring  us  to  confront  the  little  tradition 
of  Kishan  Garhi. 

First,  there  are  four  festivals  which  have  no  evident  Sanskritic  rationales. 
.  .  .  Second,  those  festivals  of  Kishan  Garhi  which  do  have  Sanskritic  ra- 
tionales represent  only  a  small  selection  of  the  total  annual  cycle  of  festivals 
which  finds  sanction  in  the  great  tradition.  .  .  .  Third,  between  the  festivals 
of  Kishan  Garhi  and  those  sanctioned  by  the  great  tradition,  connections 
are  often  loosened,  confused,  or  mistaken  because  of  a  multiplicity  of  com- 
peting meanings  for  each  special  day  within  the  great  tradition  itself.  .  .  . 
Accustomed  to  an  interminable  variety  of  over-lapping  Sanskritic  mythology, 
villagers  have  ceased  to  be  much  concerned  with  distinguishing  the  "right" 
great-traditional  explanation  of  a  festival  from  such  Sanskritic-sounding  and 
possibly  newly  invented  ones  as  may  be  convenient. 


CALENDRICAL    AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 


123 


Fourth,  behind  their  Sanskritic  names  and  multiple  great-traditional  ra- 
tionales, the  festivals  of  Kishan  Garhi  contain  much  ritual  which  has  no 
evident  connection  with  the  great   tradition.    (Marriott,    1955a,   pp.    193  ff.) 

Srinivas  has  pointed  out  regional  variety  in  festivals: 

Festivals  such  as  the  Dasara,  Deepavali,  and  Holi  have  no  doubt  certain 
common  features  all  over  the  country,  but  they  have  also  important  regional 
peculiarities.  In  the  case  of  some  festivals  only  the  name  is  common  all  over 
India  and  everything  else  is  different — the  same  name  connotes  different 
things  to  peoples  in  different  regions.  (Srinivas,  1956,  p.  494) 


TABLE  1 

Calendrical  Ceremonies  in  Sirkanda» 


Name 

1.  Phul  Dalna 

2.  Poprla  Sakrant 


Meaning  Month 

Flower  placing;  rite  of  spring     Chait  (March-April) 

First  of  month  when  poppers     Baisak  (April-May) 
(type  of  bread)  are  eaten;  chil- 
dren's god  worshiped 

First  of  month  when  image  of    Jet  (May-June) 
wild  goat  is  eaten 

(Secular  fair,  following  spring    Jet  (May-June) 
harvest) 

Wrist  charms  Bhado  (August- 

September) 

5.  Jenem  Ashtml  Barat    Krishna's  birthday  fast  Bhado  (August- 

September) 

Worship  of  household  dead        Asoj  (September- 
October) 

Nine  nights  (worship  of  Durga)  Asoj  (September- 
October) 

Cow  honoring  Katik  (October- 

November) 

Festival  of  lights;  follows  fall    Magsir  (November- 
harvest,  one  month  after  December) 
plains  Diwali 


3.  GhoRlia  Sakrant 
(Taulu) 

4.  Rakrl 


6.  Kanagat 

7.  Nauratra. 

8.  Gaojiman 

9.  Pahari  Diwali 


10.  Kicherl  Sakrant 

11.  Panchmi  Basant 

12.  Shiv  Ratri  Barat 


First  of  month  when  rice  and    Mau  (January- 
dal  mixture  is  eaten  February) 

Spring  fifth 


Mau  (January- 
February) 

Shiva's  (birthday)  night  fast       Phagun  (February- 
March) 
For  descriptions  of  these  ceremonies,  see  Appendix  II. 


124  CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

Marriott's  first  point  has  been  applied  to  Sirkanda  in  the  discussion 
above,  and  his  third  and  fourth  points  will  be  elaborated  in  the  de- 
scriptions to  follow.  The  second  point,  that  the  festivals  in  any  partic- 
ular locality  are  but  a  small  sample  of  the  universe  of  Hindu  festivals, 
can  be  documented  here.  Of  the  thirteen  major  festivals  of  Hindu  re- 
ligion listed  by  Hindu  scholars  in  Morgan's  book,  three  are  celebrated 
in  Sirkanda  as  compared  to  seven  in  Kishan  Garhi  (Morgan,  1953,  p. 
423;  Marriott,  1955a,  p.  194).  "Of  the  35  presumably  all-Indian  Hindu 
festivals  listed  by  Swami  Sivananda  only  9  occur  in  Kishan  Garhi" 
(Marriott,  1955a,  p.  194),  and  only  seven  occur  in  Sirkanda  (Sivananda, 
1947,  pp.  1-57).  In  comparing  local  with  regional  festivals  we  note  that 
among  the  twelve  annual  festivals  of  Sirkanda  are  nine  of  the  nineteen 
festivals  of  Rampur,  seven  of  the  nineteen  at  Kishan  Garhi,  nine  of 
the  thirty-five  calendrical  festivals  at  Senapur,  and  five  of  the  twelve 
among  Senapur  Chamars.  Obviously  some  of  these  are  North  Indian 
regional  festivals  or  festivals  which,  like  Kanagat,  are  practically  uni- 
versal in  Indian  Hinduism,  but  are  not  included  in  the  literary  "great 
tradition." 

Sirkanda  is  within  the  broad  culture  area  of  North  India  but  more 
specifically  in  that  of  the  sub-Himalayan  hills.  It  would  therefore  be 
expected  to  share  religious  observance  with  other  people  of  the  area. 
Atkinson  reports  a  variety  of  local,  regional,  and  all-India  ceremonial 
and  festival  observances  which  occur  among  hill  people  of  Garhwal 
and  Kumaon,  totaling  over  60  (Atkinson,  1884a,  pp.  847-874).  Ten  of 
these  are  among  Sirkanda's  twelve,  leaving  only  two  Sirkanda  ob- 
servances of  such  limited  significance  or  distribution  that  they  are  not 
reported  for  neighboring  regions  of  the  same  cultural-linguistic  area. 

The  outstanding  feature  of  Sirkanda's  ceremonial  cycle  is  its  basic 
similarity  to  that  of  other  Indian  villages.  Its  greatest  differences  seem 
to  lie  in  its  sparseness  and  the  weakness  of  its  ties  to  the  great  tradition, 
even  where  great-traditional  affinities  can  be  detected. 

Conspicuous  by  their  absence  in  Sirkanda  are  the  great  festivals  of 
the  plains,  Holi,  and  Dashera.  Occasionally  Sirkanda  villagers  witness 
such  festivals  in  towns  or  trading  villages  in  the  valley.  The  Ram  Lila, 
a  dramatic  presentation  of  the  Ramayana  preceding  Dashera,  is  at- 
tended in  valley  villages  by  a  few  Sirkanda  villagers,  and  Holi  can 
hardly  be  avoided  by  any  who  may  be  traveling  outside  the  hills  on 
that  day.  Such  events  are,  however,  regarded  as  alien,  just  as  are  simi- 
larly recognized  Sikh  and  Muslim  festivals. 

The  social  composition  of  participating  groups  in  calendrical  cere- 
monies in  Sirkanda  can  be  briefly  indicated  here,  although  descriptions 
of  the  nature  of  the  ceremonies  is  confined  to  Appendix  II. 


CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES  125 

In  all  but  one  ceremony,  the  ceremonial  observance  takes  place 
primarily  within  the  household  unit,  by  household  members.  The 
exception,  Nauratra  (number  7  on  the  list  in  table  1),  is  celebrated  by 
a  village  dance  and  worship  of  Devi.  There  is  similar  worship  on 
Diwali  (number  9),  accompanied  by  household  worship  and  worship  by 
all  devotees  of  one  god,  Nag  Raja.  All  village  children  together  worship 
the  children's  god  on  Popria  Sakrant  (number  2),  and  there  is  house- 
hold worship  as  well  on  that  occasion.  On  all  other  calendrical  cere- 
monies household  units  worship  separately. 

Jenem  Ashtmi  Barat  (number  5)  and  Shiv  Ratri  Barat  (number  12), 
the  two  fasts,  honoring  Vishnu  and  Shiva  respectively,  are  observed  by 
only  a  few  of  the  more  sophisticated  (educated,  high-caste)  families, 
who  fast  in  accordance  with  plains  custom.  On  the  other  ceremonial 
occasions  there  is  enthusiastic  participation  by  nearly  everyone,  on  a 
household  basis. 

Brahmins  are  prominently  involved  as  priests  in  three  of  the  cere- 
monies, Rakri,  Kanagat,  and  Kicheri  Sakrant,  and  less  prominently  in 
two  others,  Navratra  and  Diwali.  In  the  first  they  tie  wrist  bands  on 
household  members  and  receive  charity  in  return.  In  the  third  they 
are  the  recipients  of  charity  given  for  general  merit  but  not  in  return 
for  any  specific  service.  In  the  last  two  they  perform  worship  to  village 
gods  on  behalf  of  the  village. 

Bajgis,  as  drummers,  are  prominent  in  all  three  Sakrants,  and  in 
the  celebration  of  Panchmi  Basant,  for  which  they  play  their  drums 
and  receive  gifts  of  sugar,  grain,  or  cooked  food  in  return.  They  per- 
form similar  service  for  like  remuneration  on  other  periodic  and 
life-cycle  ceremonial  occasions. 

Finally,  the  barber  is  the  main  religious  functionary  on  Panchmi 
Basant,  when  he  performs  a  simple  ceremony  welcoming  spring. 

In  the  rest  of  the  ceremonial  observances  cited  here,  the  family  per- 
forms its  own  ritual  functions  without  assistance. 

One  annual  secular  event  is  important  in  Sirkanda.  This  is  the  fair 
(taulu)  held  in  the  middle  of  Jet  (May-June),  on  a  hilltop  in  the  cen- 
ter of  Bhatbair  about  four  miles  from  Sirkanda.  It  is  widely  attended 
by  Bhatbair  residents  including  many  people  from  Sirkanda,  but  at- 
tracts no  non-Paharis  other  than  two  or  three  merchants.  This  fair 
corresponds  in  its  temporal  relationship  to  the  spring  harvest,  precisely 
as  Diwali,  the  greatest  annual  festival  of  Sirkanda,  does  in  its  relation- 
ship to  autumn  harvest.  Both  occur  just  after  the  hard  work  is  over. 
The  fair  bears  many  resemblances  to  Diwali,  but  the  resemblances  are 
not  related  to  religion,  for  it  is  not  a  religious  event.  As  on  Diwali, 
there  is  general  blossoming  out  in  good  clothes,  accompanied  by  gaiety, 


126  CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

sociability,  dancing,  singing,  drinking,  and  general  lowering  of  in- 
hibitions. The  fair  and  Diwali  are  the  two  big  holidays  in  the  hills,  and 
they  are  anticipated  with  equal  relish.  Only  an  occasional  wedding 
matches  them  in  public  appeal.  They  may  well  be  derived  from  the 
two  non-Brahmanical  but  "really  popular  festivals  .  .  .  held  at  the 
two  harvests,"  mentioned  by  Atkinson  (1884b,  p.  64). 

Three  other  fairs  are  attended  regularly  by  some  Sirkanda  people. 
All  have  some  religious  significance  that  is  vague  or  unimportant  to 
villagers.  One  is  held  at  the  Kuddu  Kal  temple  in  mid-AsaRh  (June- 
July),  one  is  at  Mussoorie  in  early  Asoj  (September),  and  the  third  is 
at  Rajpur  in  mid-Baisdk  (April-May).  The  first  two  are  primarily 
Pahari  fairs,  and  the  last  is  heavily  attended  by  Paharis.  Sirkanda 
people  do  not  care  to  attend  festivities  of  non-Paharis  simply  because 
they  feel  out  of  place. 

Life-Cycle  Ceremonies 

Three  events  in  the  lives  of  all  individuals  in  Sirkanda  are  rein- 
forced by  the  family  and  community  with  ritual  performances.  These 
are:  birth,  marriage,  and  death.  In  addition  high-caste  males  are  ad- 
mitted as  adult  members  of  their  caste  in  the  sacred  thread  ceremony, 
generally  associated  with  marriage.  These  rituals  are  universal  in  Hindu 
India.  Those  in  Sirkanda,  like  those  in  villages  throughout  India, 
show  certain  differences  from,  as  well  as  resemblances  to,  the  rites 
prescribed  in  the  literature  of  the  great  traditions  of  Hinduism.  In 
Sirkanda  they  are  based  on  written  prescriptions  used  in  the  area  by 
Pahari  Brahmin  priests. 

Birth  and  Childhood 

Birth  ceremonies  in  Sirkanda  are  much  like  those  in  the  plains. 
The  birth  of  a  son  is  announced  by  distributing  sugar  lumps  to  friends 
and  relatives  on  the  day  of  birth.  A  girl's  birth  is  not  formally  pro- 
claimed. The  first  ceremony  in  the  child's  life  is  that  of  das  sotan — the 
tenth  day  after  birth.  On  this  day  a  Brahmin  is  called  to  prepare  the 
child's  horoscope,  a  process  which  may  take  many  days,  during  which 
time  he  lives  at  the  house  of  his  client.  The  Brahmin  gives  the  child  a 
name  at  this  time,  but  he  is  not  known  by  this  name.  Many  people  do 
not  know  the  names  written  in  their  own  horoscopes  or  those  of  their 
children.  In  the  first  weeks,  months,  and  years  a  child  acquires  names 
given  by  its  parents  or  other  family  members.  One  informant  had  five 
such  names.  Literate  men  often  later  adopt  yet  another  name  for  signa- 
tures which,  in  contrast  to  their  village  name,  is  usually  a  conventional 


CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES  127 

Sanskritic  Hindu  name.  One  man  ridiculed  a  current  trend  toward 
fancy  Sanskritic  names:  "If  you  call  a  jackal  'lion,'  it  is  still  a  jackal." 

One  year  after  birth  a  Brahmin  conducts  a  ceremony,  the  "taste  of 
boiled  rice,"  which  is  supposed  to  be  at  the  time  of  first  giving  the 
child  solid  food.  Boys  have  their  first  haircut  during  a  ceremony  per- 
formed by  a  Brahmin  and  a  barber,  held  on  the  third,  fifth,  or  seventh 
birthday,  depending  upon  the  Brahmin's  reading  of  the  horoscope. 

Special  ceremonies  related  to  birth  include  those  performed  to  bring 
about  conception  in  childless  couples,  and  those  held  to  eliminate  the 
danger  which  two  new  mothers  (those  who  have  given  birth  in  the 
same  month)  pose  to  one  another  if  they  are  in  contact.1 

Marriage 

Marriage  in  any  Hindu  family  is  a  complex  process.  Lewis  dis- 
tinguishes five  major  phases  in  what  he  terms  the  "marriage  cycle"  of 
Rampur,  and  within  these  he  notes  twenty  distinct  "ceremonial  steps" 
(Lewis,  1958,  pp.  157-190).  He  also  distinguishes  two  less  frequent 
types  of  marriage,  and  remarriage  of  a  deserted  woman. 

In  Sirkanda  there  is  greater  variation  in  marriage  practices  than  is 

described  or  implied  for  Rampur.  Ceremonies  are  used  in  Sirkanda  to 

celebrate  only  the  first  marriage  of  a  woman — about  65  per  cent  of  all 

unions  established.  Until  the  post-Independence  era  at  least  one-third 

of  initial  marriages  of  high-caste  women  were  unmarked  by  ceremonies 

simply  because  of  the  expense  and  effort  involved.  Marriages  without 

ceremonies  still  occur,  but  less  frequently.  Thus,  among  the  residents 

of  Sirkanda  no  more  than  50  per  cent  of  current  high-caste  unions  were 

marked  by  wedding  ceremonies.  Among  low  castes  the  proportion  is 

considerably  smaller.  Among  the  50  per  cent  of  all  marriages  which 

were  marked  by  ceremony,  there  have  been  three  major  varieties  of 

ceremony:  (1)  the  traditional  Pahari  wedding  (bid),  a  manifestation  of 

regional  tradition,  (2)  the  traditional  Hindu  wedding  of  the  plains 

modified  by   bride   price   and  related   practices,   called   tako-ka    bid 

(money  marriage)  or  paisd  (money)  wedding,  (3)  the  traditional  plains 

wedding  complete  with  dowry,  called  kanniaddn  (daughter  charity)  or 

pun  (gift)  wedding.  The  first  of  these  was  the  only  type  of  wedding 

ceremony  performed  in  Sirkanda  until  five  or  ten  years  before  Indian 

Independence,  but  it  has  since  been  dropped  altogether.  In  it,  as  in 

all  Pahari  weddings  but  unlike  plains  weddings,  the  groom's  family 

takes  the  initiative  in  arranging  the  marriage.  A  unique  feature  of  the 

traditional  Pahari  marriage  is  that  the  final  ceremonies  are  conducted 

at  the  home  of  the  groom.  In  the  other  forms  of  marriage  in  this  area, 

as  in  the  plains,  the  ceremonies  occur  in  the  bride's  house. 


128  CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

The  plains-type  dowry  marriage  has  long  occurred  among  educated 
and  wealthy  Paharis  of  neighboring  areas,  but  it  has  occurred  in  Sir- 
kanda  only  since  shortly  before  Independence.  The  second  type,  a 
syncretism,  is  an  equally  recent  innovation  and  is  currently  the  most 
frequently  used.  The  latter  two  types,  and  particularly  the  orthodox 
plains  Hindu  dowry  marriage,  are  indicative  of  the  trend  toward  emu- 
lation of  plains  culture  (Sanskritization)  advocated  by  educated 
Paharis.2  The  percentage  of  initial  marriages  unmarked  by  ceremony 
has  dropped  in  recent  years,  but  has  not  disappeared. 

At  weddings  a  considerable  number  of  interested  people  participate 
— in  preparation,  caring  for  guests,  assisting  the  ceremonial  cooks  and 
the  priest,  assisting  the  principals  in  the  wedding,  and  so  on.  The 
people  involved  in  order  of  decreasing  intensity  of  involvement  are: 
the  extended-family  members,  the  lineage,  the  kindred  (including 
people  outside  the  lineage  who  are  recognized  as  relatives  of  the  bride 
or  groom),  and  often  friends,  especially  sib-fellows  and  caste-fellows  in 
the  village.  The  kindred  comes  nearer  to  visibility  as  a  group  at  this 
time  than  at  any  other. 

DOWRY    AND    BRIDE    PRICE 

The  traditional  form  of  Pahari  marriage  involves  a  bride  price; 
that  is,  the  family  of  the  groom  pays  an  agreed-upon  sum  in  cash  to  the 
family  of  the  bride.  In  the  early  1900's  this  amount  was  generally  under 
Rs.  50;  by  World  War  II  it  had  risen  to  between  Rs.  200  and  400;  and 
now  it  varies  from  Rs.  500  to  1,500  with  an  average  around  Rs.  1,000. 
In  addition  to  the  bride  price  the  groom's  family  spends  around  Rs. 
1,000  on  food  and  other  materials  for  a  good-sized  wedding,  Rs.  750  on 
jewelry  and  other  gifts,  and  Rs.  250  for  the  services  of  specialists  and 
other  miscellaneous  expenses.  The  bride's  family  spends  an  equal 
amount  on  entertaining  guests  (about  Rs.  1,000)  and  perhaps  another 
Rs.  500  on  clothing,  dowry,  gifts,  and  so  on.  Therefore,  the  bride  price 
is  used  in  the  marriage  by  the  bride's  family.  Rarely  is  any  profit 
realized.  If  no  bride  price  is  given,  as  is  the  case  with  some  well-to-do 
families,  the  expenses  on  both  sides  are  about  equal.  A  dowry  is  nearly 
always  given  by  the  bride's  family  to  the  couple,  but  in  bride-price 
marriages  it  is  a  token  gift  only. 

Everyone  knows  that  bride-price  marriage  is  contrary  to  high-caste 
plains  custom.3  Therefore  there  is  considerable  striving  toward  dowry 
marriages  on  the  part  of  some  of  those  who  can  afford  it.  The  Brahmin 
who  performs  most  high-caste  ceremonies  is  a  vociferous  advocate  of 
such  marriages.  Prestige  is  the  goal  of  these  ceremonies.  Statements 
such  as  the  following  from  a  well-to-do  Rajput  are  common:   "We 


CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES  129 

don't  like  bride-price  marriage.  How  can  you  sell  a  daughter  you  love?" 
Or  another:  "You  can't  enjoy  money  you  receive  for  a  daughter." 
Usually  this  is  merely  repetition  of  platitudes,  as  both  the  men  quoted 
had  given  and  received  bride  price  in  their  day.  On  the  other  hand, 
there  are  many  families  who  will  not  give  or  take  a  bride  without  pay- 
ment and  are  proud  of  it.  As  one  Rajput  elder  said,  "It  is  not  proper 
for  Rajputs  to  accept  charity.  Only  a  Brahmin  can  do  that.  When  we 
take  a  girl,  we  pay  for  her."  There  is  also  a  widespread  belief  that 
dowry  brides  do  not  live  nor  produce  children.  It  is  only  in  the  past 
fifteen  years  that  a  real  trend  toward  dowry  marriages  has  begun  even 
among  families  who  can  afford  them.  Still  at  least  80  per  cent  of  all 
marriages  include  a  bride  price.  Sometimes  when  no  bride  price  is 
given,  the  groom's  family  promises  to  bear  all  the  wedding  expenses.  If 
so,  it  is  a  case  of  the  bride's  family  trying  to  have  the  cake  and  eat  it 
too.  In  at  least  one  recent  situation  a  dowry  marriage  was  held  but  a 
bride  price  was  demanded  later. 

In  former  days  it  was  common  among  all  castes  to  effect  a  bride-price 
transaction  without  ceremony  of  any  kind  beyond  agreement  between 
the  families.  Meals  might  be  exchanged  at  the  time  of  agreement  and 
of  bringing  the  bride.  A  puja  to  the  household  god  was  frequently  in- 
cluded. Thus  the  expenses  of  marriage  ceremonies  were  avoided.  The 
practice  still  exists,  especially  among  the  lower  castes.  Joshi  cites  a  legal 
case  in  which  validity  of  a  Pahari  marriage  was  sought  to  be  proved 
on  grounds  that  the  bride  was  delivered  to  her  husband,  those  who 
brought  her  were  feasted,  and  a  puja  was  performed.  Although  this 
failed  in  the  courts  where  Pahari  custom  was  unrecognized,  Joshi 
asserts  that  even  these  three  acts  are  not  required  for  a  valid  marriage 
under  Khasa  customary  law.  "The  payment  of  bride-price  and  formal 
entry  as  wife  in  the  husband's  house  are  enough  for  the  purpose" 
(Joshi,  1929,  p.  40). 

SECOND    MARRIAGE 

Some  families  of  all  castes  now  have  Sanskritized  marriage  rituals. 
Second  or  subsequent  marriages  of  women,  and  often  of  men,  have 
always  been  effected  without  ceremony.  Usually  a  divorced  woman's 
parents  are  then  paid  the  bride  price  and  they  pass  it  on  to  her  former 
husband,  though  occasionally  direct  payment  is  made  to  the  husband. 
In  the  case  of  widow  remarriage,  a  universal  practice  in  this  area,  pay- 
ment is  generally  made  to  the  first  husband's  family  if  the  widow 
marries  outside  it,  unless  she  elopes. 

Second  marriages  for  men  may  be  carried  out  with  ceremonies  just 
like  the  first  if  it  is  the  bride's  first  marriage  and  especially  if  the  man 


l^O  CALENDRICAL    AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

is  young  and  has  no  children.  Such  marriages  are  most  often  bride- 
price  marriages  because  a  girl's  family  who  wants  a  big  dowry  marriage 
will  usually  find  an  unmarried  husband  for  their  daughter.  Moreover, 
many  second  marriages  are  contracted  to  produce  children,  and  a  bride 
price  is  considered  more  likely  to  bring  that  result. 

Elopement  and  inheritance  of  a  wife  from  a  brother  are  both  pub- 
licly recognized  forms  of  marriage  wherein  ceremony  and  payment  are 
avoided,  though  payment  is  exacted  by  the  aggrieved  husband  in  an 
elopement  if  possible.  Poor  families  of  all  castes  often  effect  marriage 
without  ceremony  or  payment  simply  by  common  agreement. 

Divorce  proceedings  will  be  discussed  in  chapter  5. 

Sacred  Thread 

Rajput  and  Brahmin  males  are  initiated  into  adulthood  with  the 
ceremony  of  investiture  with  the  sacred  thread  (jainu  or  bartbhandan) 
indicating  their  spiritual  rebirth  (cf.  Atkinson,  1884b,  pp.  92  ff.).  They 
are  then  said  to  be  "twice  born"  and  therefore  are  possessed  of  the 
knowledge  necessary  to  an  adult  man  of  high  caste.  The  ceremony  is 
evidently  of  relatively  recent  origin  in  these  hills,  adopted  along  with 
Sanskritic  marriage  forms  in  an  effort  toward  plains  emulation  or 
Sanskritization.  Normally  this  ceremony  takes  place  in  the  groom's 
village  as  part  of  the  pre-marriage  ceremonies.  If  a  man  is  not  married 
and  is  an  adult,  or  if  he  has  not  gone  through  a  marriage  ceremony, 
he  may  call  for  the  sacred  thread  ceremony  at  any  time  after  he  is  about 
20  years  old. 

Death  Ceremonies 

Ceremonies  surrounding  death  are  as  complex  as  those  surround- 
ing marriage  (see  Appendix  IIIC).  It  is  believed  in  Sirkanda,  as  in 
Hindu  India  generally,  that  a  person's  life  after  death  will  be  greatly 
influenced  by  the  amount  of  charity  that  he  has  given  in  this  life  and 
that  is  given  in  the  ceremonies  associated  with  his  death.  Specifically 
it  is  thought  that  only  what  has  been  given  in  life  and  at  these  cere- 
monies will  be  available  to  the  spirit  for  livelihood  in  the  afterlife. 
Sirkanda  villagers  tell  an  eye-witness  account  of  a  woman  who  came 
back  to  life  shortly  after  death  and  begged  that  more  charity  be  given, 
since  she  had  found  that  there  was  nothing  for  her  to  live  on  and  no 
comforts  in  the  other  world  because  of  her  niggardliness  in  life.  There- 
fore a  person  who  has  no  descendants  upon  whom  he  can  depend  to 
carry  out  the  death  ceremonies  properly  will  usually  sponsor  pujas  and 
give  the  necessary  charity  in  advance.  This  charity  is  given  to  the  tra- 
ditional village  Brahmin  or  purohit,  although  in  Sirkanda  the  cere- 


CALENDRICAL    AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES  131 

monies  are  performed  by  more  learned  Brahmins.  The  persons  in- 
volved in  the  mourning  and  ritual  pollution  which  follows  a  death  are 
primarily  the  male  lineage  members — those  who  trace  descent  to  a 
common  ancestor — and  to  a  lesser  extent  the  local  sib  members  and 
those  closely  associated  with  them,  that  is,  the  clan,  for  wives  of  these 
people  play  a  minor  role.  The  eldest  son  or  an  equivalent  male  relative 
(sometimes  an  adopted  son)  performs  the  duties  of  chief  mourner. 
During  the  ceremonies  the  Brahmin  performs  pujas,  directs  the  chief 
mourner  in  his  duties,  and  receives  charity.  The  barber  provides  leaf 
packets  used  in  the  ceremony,  prepares  the  pipe  for  the  Brahmin's  use, 
and  prepares  the  leaf  plates  for  the  feast  at  the  end  of  the  mourning 
period. 

Widows  are  not  restricted  in  activity  or  dress,  as  they  often  are  on 
the  plains.  An  unremarried  widow  does  not,  however,  take  an  active 
part  in  birth  or  marriage  ceremonies.  Also,  she  does  not  wear  gold 
nose  ornaments  (the  symbols  of  marriage)  for  at  least  a  year  after  her 
husband's  death  or  until  she  remarries,  whichever  comes  first.  Widow 
remarriage  is  universal  here  except  when  the  widow  is  elderly. 

If  a  villager  dies  far  from  home  the  postdeath  ceremonies  are  per- 
formed in  his  village  home.  A  married  woman's  death  is  observed  only 
in  the  village  of  her  husband  and  by  the  family  of  her  husband.  Her 
family  of  origin  takes  no  part  in  it  except  as  observers  if  they  are  in  the 
same  village. 

Children,  and  often  unmarried  adolescents,  who  die  are  buried 
without  ceremony  in  unmarked  graves  near  the  village.  Strangers  who 
die  in  the  vicinity  are  usually  buried  rather  than  cremated  so  that 
proof  of  death  can  be  established  if  necessary  later.  Adults  who  die  of 
epidemic  diseases  are  buried  and  then  exhumed  and  cremated  after 
the  epidemic  has  passed,  usually  three  to  six  months  later. 

Kin,  Caste,  and  Community  in  Religion  and  Ceremonies 

The  household,  comprising  the  joint  family,  is  the  most  significant 
social  unit  in  religious  matters  in  Sirkanda.4  Deities  and  other  super- 
natural beings  generally  attack  the  household  and  must  be  dealt  with 
by  its  members  collectively.  This  is  true  even  when  only  a  single  mem- 
ber feels  the  wrath  of  the  gods,  since  they  remain  with  the  household 
once  they  have  entered  it.  The  worship  of  household  gods  is  the  most 
frequent  expression  of  religious  behavior  in  the  village.  Life-cycle  rites 
are  likewise  observed  in  the  household  unit,  generally  with  participa- 
tion by  local  sib  fellows,  their  spouses,  and  adopted  sons  (that  is,  the 
clan);  other  villagers  are  observers  or  guests  at  best.  Local  lineage  is 


132  CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

most  significant  in  death  ceremonies  for  a  man,  and  the  local  clan  runs  a 
close  second.  For  a  woman  the  corresponding  groups  are  the  husband's 
local  lineage  and  the  clan.  The  kindred  looms  large  in  marriage.  Most 
annual  festivals  are  performed  in  household  groups.  There  are  special 
ceremonies  for  the  well-being  of  the  household.  Lineage,  clan,  kindred, 
and  sib  are  significant  in  such  household  ceremonies  in  that  order. 

No  specific  caste  deities  are  worshiped  in  this  village,  although  cer- 
tain ones  tend  in  fact  to  be  associated  with  certain  castes.  Household 
observances,  whether  worship  or  life-cycle  rites,  remain  within  the 
caste  in  that  those  primarily  concerned  are  relatives,  and  all  relatives 
are  caste  fellows.  For  castes  separated  by  little  social  or  ritual  distance, 
attendance  at  ceremonies  extends  across  caste  boundaries,  as,  for  ex- 
ample, between  Rajputs  and  Brahmins,  or  between  barbers,  black- 
smiths, and  carpenters.  Members  of  ritually  and  socially  more  distant 
castes  are  not  often  explicitly  barred  from  attendance,  but  they  are 
barred  from  participation  in  many  activities,  such  as  group  eating, 
which  are  central  to  the  celebration  and  which  would  be  polluting  to, 
or  polluted  by,  these  castes.  Usually  there  is  no  desire  for  cross-caste 
participation  in  such  ceremonies,  as  was  made  explicit  by  a  low-caste 
informant  who  commented  that,  "There  is  no  enjoyment  for  me  at  a 
Rajput  wedding.  We  can  only  have  fun  at  weddings  in  our  own  caste." 

There  are  no  caste  festivals  or  holidays  among  the  castes  represented 
in  Sirkanda.  Caste  enters  the  religious  and  ceremonial  picture  primarily 
in  the  caste-specific  roles  of  participants,  as  in  the  barber's  duties  in  life- 
cycle  rites,  the  Bajgi's  role  in  worship  of  deities  and  certain  annual 
and  life-cycle  ceremonies,  the  carpenter's  ritual  function  in  blessing 
the  doorways  of  a  new  house,  and  the  Brahmin's  priestly  role. 

Caste  differences  in  religious  belief  and  usage  are  virtually  absent — 
a  notable  contrast  to  the  situation  reported  for  other  parts  of  India. 
Where  they  do  occur  in  Sirkanda,  they  represent  differences  in  edu- 
cation, wealth,  and  enforced  restrictions  on  low-caste  behavior  more 
than  differences  in  beliefs  or  aspirations.  Educated  people  know  more 
of  the  Sanskritic  tradition  than  do  others,  and  they  tend  to  be  of  the 
high  castes,  but  uneducated  Brahmins  and  Rajputs  differ  little  from 
Doms  in  their  knowledge  and  beliefs.  Even  among  Brahmins  there  is 
little  concern  with  ritual  observance  or  daily  worship.  They  maintain 
ritual  distance  from  lower  castes  as  do  Rajputs  and  some  of  the  low 
castes,  but  their  ritual  life  does  not  differ  significantly  from  that  of 
other  castes.  Diet  of  high-caste  members  and  Doms  differs  not  at  all 
except  as  dictated  by  differential  income.  Bathing  is  as  foreign  to  most 
Brahmins  as  to  Bajgis. 

The  lack  of  caste  differential  in  such  matters  is  apparently  attribu- 


CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES  133 

table  in  part  to  the  frequent  and  intense  interaction  among  members 
of  all  castes  in  Sirkanda.  In  such  villages  the  entire  population  is  largely 
isolated  from  frequent  contact  with  people  other  than  their  fellow 
villagers.  Since  most  castes  are  very  small  in  numbers,  their  daily 
social  interaction  must  be  largely  with  members  of  other  castes.  No 
caste  remains  isolated  from  any  other.  The  various  castes  have  more  in 
common  and  interact  more  frequently  than  would  groups  separated 
by  greater  social  barriers  or  with  caste  communities  of  their  own,  and 
consequently  they  have  less  opportunity  to  maintain  differences  in 
beliefs  and  practices  (cf.  Berreman,  1960b). 

The  community  is  the  unit  which  observes  some  annual  festivals, 
notably  Diwali.  It  is  also  the  traditional  unit  for  observance  of  agri- 
cultural ceremonies  and  worship  of  the  village  gods.  Two  specifically 
village-directed  ceremonies  are  the  Mundkile  village-protection  cere- 
mony and  the  rope-sliding  event  to  alleviate  village  and  regional 
troubles. 

Supervillage  observances  are  limited  to  annual  regional  fairs  and 
the  rope-sliding  ceremony.  In  Bhatbair  the  one  such  fair  is  evidently 
secular  in  nature,  while  those  in  larger  centers  often  have  religious 
meaning. 

Religion  is  thus  an  important  feature  at  every  level  in  Sirkanda.  Its 
place  is  similar  to  that  of  religion  in  other  Indian  villages.  Opler's 
summary  statement  applies  as  well  to  Sirkanda  as  it  does  to  Senapur, 
the  plains  village  of  which  it  was  written: 

To  live  a  very  full  and  estimable  life,  a  villager  has  to  participate  in  the 
religious  round.  Religion  justifies  the  existence  of  his  line,  the  tie  between 
his  ancestors  and  his  sons.  It  holds  his  kin  together  in  family  rituals.  It 
provides  travel,  adventure,  and  new  experience  and  connects  his  village  with 
others.  .  .  .  The  presence  of  the  protective  godlings  of  the  village  strengthens 
group  consciousness.  The  agricultural  rites,  the  worship  of  the  disease  god- 
desses, and  the  life-cycle  ceremonies  awake  courage  and  hope  in  areas  of  life 
where  uncertainty  and  anxiety  are  most  prevalent.  (Opler,  1959b,  p.  226) 

Brahmins  and  Shamans 

One  of  the  most  striking  features  of  traditional  religious  organiza- 
tion in  Sirkanda  and  vicinity  is  the  strategic  importance  of  the  shaman 
(baki)  (cf.  Berreman,  1961a).  In  the  sphere  of  religion  he  is  a  "cultural 
policy  maker,"  to  use  Singer's  term  (Singer,  1955,  p.  30) — a  cultural 
"gatekeeper."  He  is  a  man,  who  may  be  of  any  caste,  whose  prestige  and 
power  are  dependent  upon  success  in  his  practice  of  diagnosing  super- 
naturally  caused  difficulties  through  the  use  of  a  personal  deity  who 


134  CALENDRICAL    AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

provides  the  insights  and  information,  using  the  practitioner  as  a  ve- 
hicle. He  is  the  key  man  in  virtually  every  instance  of  traditional  re- 
ligious worship.  He  determines  which  supernatural  being  is  to  be 
worshiped  or  placated,  be  it  household,  village,  regional,  or  all-India 
Hindu  god,  or  be  it  ancestor,  ghost,  spirit,  or  witch.  He  often  determines 
which  puja  will  be  performed,  which  sacrifices  will  be  offered,  which 
pilgrimages  undertaken,  which  new  gods  will  be  worshiped,  and,  in  the 
long  run,  which  ones  will  fall  by  the  wayside.  Styles  and  fads  of  wor- 
ship, means  of  correcting  troubles  and  treating  disease,  are  largely  in 
the  shaman's  hands.  Certain  lesser  practitioners  share  a  part  of  these 
important  functions.  To  be  sure,  such  people  work  within  their  cul- 
ture and  are  probably  largely  unaware  of  their  key  importance.  They 
may  well  be  unaware  of  the  extent  to  which  they  could  manipulate 
their  clients  if  they  wished.  This  does  not  alter  the  fact  of  their  crucial 
role.  Traditionally  they  have  undoubtedly  been  the  most  important 
individuals  in  influencing  the  nature  of  religious  practice. 

Brahmins  have  played  an  important  but  less  significant  religious 
role  from  the  point  of  view  of  dynamics  of  culture  in  the  traditional 
setting.  They  operate  primarily  within  rigidly  prescribed  limits  of 
ritual  with  little  opportunity  for  initiative  or  innovation  despite  their 
high  status.  When  they  are  called  and  what  they  will  do  are  often 
prescribed  by  a  shaman.  They  are,  in  fact,  ritual  technicians  or  engi- 
neers. The  shaman  makes  most  of  the  decisions  and  therefore  is  the 
policy  maker. 

Plains  emulation  has  been  effectively  advocated  by  some  Pahari 
Brahmins,  but  these  advocates  have  been  priests  with  a  plains  orienta- 
tion seeking  to  establish  or  enlarge  their  clientele,  not  traditional  fam- 
ily priests  or  purohits  whose  clientele  is  fixed  and  assured.  It  seems 
likely  that  the  change  would  come  about  more  quickly  in  this  area  if 
it  were  advocated  by  shamans.  Shamans  could  diagnose  difficulties  of 
all  types  as  being  attributable  to  failure  to  conform  to  plains  religious 
and  social  standards.  They  could  presumably  prescribe  Sanskritic 
worship  of  great  traditional  gods  in  many  circumstances  and  people 
would  be  likely  to  follow  their  advice. 

However,  shamans,  being  uneducated  and  with  a  stake  in  the  tra- 
ditional Pahari  religious  system,  have  remained  traditional  in  their 
attitudes  and  consequently  have  impeded  plains  emulation  in  the 
religious  sphere.  They  have  nothing  to  gain  and  everything  to  lose  by 
emulation  of  plains  Hindu  orthodoxy,  for  that  orthodoxy  undermines 
their  religious  roles.  They  therefore  generally  use  their  considerable 
influence  to  encourage  adherence  to  traditional  religious  usages  and  to 
stave  off  plains  emulation. 


CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES  1 35 

Family  priests  (purohits),  with  their  assured  clientele  and  their 
status  in  the  traditional  Pahari  religious  system  are  in  much  the  same 
position.  They,  too,  stand  to  lose  by  plains  emulation,  since  villagers 
would  come  to  depend  upon  other  priests  more  learned  in  plains 
Hinduism.  Plains  emulation,  therefore,  threatens  the  purohit,  as  it 
does  the  shaman,  with  loss  of  religious  importance  and  ultimately  of 
income.  For  other  Brahmin  priests,  however,  the  reverse  is  evidently 
true;  it  is  a  means  to  economic  and  status  enhancement  (cf.  Berreman, 
1961a).  Plains  emulation  offers  new  clients  and  prestige  to  priests  who 
have  few  clients  or  no  traditional  clientele  and  who  have  learned  plains 
Hinduism. 

Increasing  contacts  with  plains  people  have  led  many  Paharis — 
especially  those  with  education,  and  these  are  mostly  from  the  high 
castes — to  adopt  high-caste  people  of  the  plains  as  a  reference  group 
in  many  contexts.  With  this  aspiration  for  plains  emulation  they  come 
to  demand  services  which  the  purohit  and  shaman  cannot  provide. 
Sophisticated,  ambitious  priests  actively  compete  for  clients  in  this 
sphere,  whereas  they  could  not — at  least  not  so  overtly — in  the  tra- 
ditional situation.  As  a  result,  in  recent  times  some  Pahari  Brahmins 
have  been  cast  in  the  role  of  religious  innovators  or  policy  makers. 
Relative  to  them,  shamans  and  purohits  have  been  religious  conserva- 
tives. The  effect  of  the  changes  advocated  by  these  enterprising  atradi- 
tional  Brahmins  in  any  given  locality  is  more  spectacular  and  perhaps 
of  more  fundamental  structural  significance  in  Pahari  religion  than 
that  effected  by  shamans  in  the  traditional  setting  over  a  comparable 
time  span.  It  involves  new  religious  and  social  conceptions,  whereas 
the  influence  of  shamans  has  been  felt  primarily  in  introducing  varia- 
tions on  traditional  Pahari  religious  themes  and  in  invoking  sanctions 
on  individuals  and  groups.  The  sanctions  can  even  be  invoked  against 
Brahmin  priests,  who  have  traditionally  consulted  shamans  as  avidly 
as  anyone  else.  It  can  be  argued  that  through  use  of  such  sanctions 
shamans  in  the  long  run  have  had  the  potential  for  structural  effect 
as  great  as  that  of  atraditional  Brahmins.  It  can  also  be  argued  that 
priests  who  advocate  plains  emulation  are  often  merely  reflecting  or 
accommodating  to  a  trend  among  sophisticated  Paharis  rather  than 
initiating  it. 

That  shamans  have  not  become  a  powerful  elite  in  their  own  right 
is  perhaps  partly  attributable  to  the  openness  of  their  profession.  Being 
neither  hereditary  nor  caste-bound,  it  is  highly  competitive.  There  are 
many  such  practitioners  and  they  are  approached  by  their  clients  on  a 
very  pragmatic  basis,  success  being  the  criterion  for  patronage.  There 
is  no  traditional  practitioner-client  arrangement  comparable  to  the 


136  CALENDRICAL    AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

jajmani  system.  Thus  the  clientele  shifts  easily,  public  opinion  is  a 
limiting  factor,  and  no  shaman  has  a  monopoly  on  the  market.  Sha- 
mans do  have  in  common  their  opposition  to  plains  emulation. 

Competition  among  atraditional  Brahmin  priests  is  tempered  by 
jajmani-like  loyalties  on  the  part  of  their  clients,  whom  they  in  fact 
refer  to  as  "jajmans."  Such  Brahmins  share  a  vested  interest  in  the 
advocacy  of  plains  emulation. 


Plains-Pahari  Religious  Differences 

In  discussing  religious  life  in  Sirkanda  emphasis  has  been  placed 
on  its  essential  similarity  to  that  found  in  other  Indian  villages,  and 
particularly  those  of  the  Gangetic  plain.  Implicit  throughout,  however, 
has  been  an  emphasis  upon  differences,  upon  the  unique  aspects  of 
Hinduism  as  it  is  practiced  in  Sirkanda.  Such  differences  have  been, 
for  the  most  part,  differences  common  to  the  region — differences  which 
help  define  the  Sub-Himalayan  region  as  a  distinct  culture  area,  that 
define  the  Central  Pahari-speaking  peoples  as  a  subcultural  group, 
that  distinguish  the  residents  of  Tehri  Garhwal  or  even  Bhatbair  from 
their  neighbors.  The  differences  have  been  most  frequently  differences 
of  emphasis  rather  than  differences  of  kind.  Paharis  do  not  do  many 
things  that  are  unknown  on  the  plains  nor  are  many  plains  practices 
entirely  foreign  to  them,  but  they  do  more  of  some  things  and  less  of 
others  and  that  is  where  the  real  difference  lies. 

As  has  been  noted  above,  perhaps  the  most  striking  religious  differ- 
ences are  those  relating  to  caste.  In  Sirkanda  there  is  remarkably  little 
variation  in  religious  belief  and  practice  from  caste  to  caste,  whereas 
in  the  plains  caste  differences  are  prominent  features  of  village  religion. 
In  Sirkanda,  Brahmins  and  Bajgis  carry  out  very  similar  rituals,  ob- 
serve the  same  festivals,  and  express  virtually  the  same  beliefs.  They 
have  distinct  ritual  functions  and  are  characterized  by  the  expectable 
differences  in  ritual  purity,  but  they  do  not  possess  significantly  dif- 
ferent religious  subcultures. 

The  Brahmin  perhaps  plays  a  less  crucial  role  in  religion  here  than 
on  the  plains.  There  are  fewer  events  requiring  his  presence.  There  is 
apparently  a  more  important  and  complex  system  of  non-Brahmanical 
practitioners — of  shamans,  diviners,  pujaris,  exorcists,  curers,  and  so 
on,  than  among  most  plains  groups.  The  services  of  these  practitioners 
are  available  to,  and  in  demand  by,  all  castes,  whereas  in  the  plains 
they  are  often  caste-specific  (cf.  P.  M.  Mahar,  1957). 

There  is  a  casualness  about  matters  of  ritual  purity,  marriage  regu- 


CALENDRICAL    AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES  137 

lations,  and  similar  religion-based  social  practices,  which  is  not  char- 
acteristic of  high-caste  plains  groups. 

Gods  of  the  literate  tradition  of  Hinduism  are  less  widely  recognized 
and  less  honored  in  this  area  than  in  the  plains.  Similarly  there  is  less 
observance  of  the  ceremonies  and  festivals  of  all-India  spread  than  is 
common  in  the  plains.  Rituals  that  are  observed  are  adapted  to  local 
convenience  and  taste  to  a  degree  perhaps  exceeding  that  in  most  areas. 
This  is  especially  noticeable  in  the  celebration  of  Diwali  and  in  mar- 
riage ceremonies.  There  is  virtually  no  daily  or  private  worship.  How- 
ever, the  people  have  a  lively  interest  in  religion  and  do  not  lack  for 
ceremonies  arranged  to  appease  their  traditional  gods.  Worship  is 
aimed  at  controlling  powerful  and  dangerous  supernatural  beings  who 
plague  them.  Such  worship  is  a  group  matter  rather  than  an  individ- 
ual one — a  family  or  village  undertaking.  Probably  the  most  distinctive 
aspect  of  worship  is  the  incorporation  of  animal  sacrifice  as  an  integral 
part  of  virtually  every  ceremony.  The  life  of  an  animal  is  required  to 
please  Pahari  gods.  The  gods  must  also  be  given  the  opportunity  to 
dance  in  the  bodies  of  their  devotees  if  they  are  to  remain  favorably 
disposed. 

In  a  low-caste  plains  community  such  beliefs  and  practices  would 
not  seem  unusual.  The  striking  feature  is  that  Sirkanda  and  other 
Pahari  villages  are  predominately  high-caste  communities  which 
closely  resemble  low-caste  communities  of  other  areas  in  the  religious 
life  of  their  members.  It  is  for  this  reason  that  Paharis  are  considered 
ritually  inferior  by  their  plains-dwelling  caste-fellows.  And  it  is  for 
this  reason  that  plains  emulation  or  Sanskritization  is  becoming  in- 
creasingly evident  among  informed  Paharis,  who  more  and  more  fre- 
quently come  into  contact  with  critical  plainsmen  in  positions  of 
authority  or  influence. 

Sirkanda  and  the  Great  Tradition 

The  discussion  of  religion  has  demonstrated  that  Sirkanda  is  within 
the  range  of  variation  of  other  Hindu  villages  in  the  practice  of  Hindu- 
ism. While  it  has  perhaps  less  in  the  way  of  all-India  Hindu- 
ism than  many  Indian  villages — especially  in  comparison  to  other 
largely  high-caste  villages  of  the  plains  of  northern  India — it  is  not 
atypical  in  this  respect  in  comparison  to  other  Pahari  villages.  This 
leads  to  the  observation  that,  while  elements  of  the  all-India  Hindu 
tradition  as  represented  in  sacred  writings  and  India-wide  precepts 
and  practices  are  prominent  enough  in  the  village  to  make  it  recog- 


138  CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

nizably  and  undeniably  a  part  of  that  tradition,  a  large  proportion  of 
village  religious  traits  do  not  fit  into  that  tradition.  To  suppose  that 
these  other  traits  are  purely  local  would  be,  however,  fallacious.  Many 
are  characteristic  of  villages  throughout  all  or  much  of  Hindu  India. 
Others  are  characteristic  of  Pahari  villages.  "Regional  Hinduism"  is 
perhaps  the  best  term  to  apply  to  those  traits  of  less  than  all-India 
spread,  since  "local  Hinduism"  is  likely  to  imply  that  the  traits  re- 
ferred to  are  unique  to  the  village  or  small  locality,  when  in  reality 
they  are  to  be  found  over  a  fairly  large  cultural  area  (cf.  Cohn  and 
Marriott,  1958).5  Finally,  there  are  purely  local  elements — if  not  in 
pattern  at  least  in  specific  content.  Such  terms  as  "local,"  "regional," 
and  "national"  Hinduism  are  merely  labels  along  a  continuum.  There 
are  no  sharp  boundaries  and  the  continuum  is  a  moving  one. 

The  terms  "great  tradition"  and  "little  tradition"  present  further 
difficulties.  They  imply  considerably  more  than  simply  geographical, 
cultural,  or  social  "spread."  The  "great  tradition"  generally  denotes 
the  "literate  religious  tradition"  (Marriott,  1955a,  p.  191).  However,  it 
is  often  used  in  the  context  of  "all-India  Hinduism"  in  discussions  of 
Indian  religion.  Conversely,  the  "little  tradition"  is  generally  implicitly 
defined  as  the  nonliterate,  vernacular  religious  tradition  but  is  often 
used  as  though  it  meant  local  Hinduism.  In  India  these  are  two  entirely 
different  dimensions.  In  village  India  it  is  possible  to  identify  literate 
religious  traditions  based  upon  the  great  religious  writings  and  em- 
bodying the  philosophical  foundations  of  the  religion.  These  can  be 
contrasted,  as  Marriott  has  done,  with  the  folk  practices  and  beliefs 
which  have  not  (or  not  yet)  been  incorporated  into  the  literate  tradi- 
tion. However,  the  nonliterate  tradition  includes  many  elements  which 
are  as  widespread  geographically  as  elements  of  the  literate  tradition. 
Some  of  these  folk  elements  may  be  more  widespread  than  many  literate 
ones  in  terms  of  the  population  which  understands  or  practices  them. 
In  discussing  traits  of  village  Hinduism  it  is  useful,  therefore,  to  discuss 
spread  in  terms  of  geography,  culture,  social  organization,  and  so  on, 
as  well  as  to  attempt  to  apply  the  literate-nonliterate  or  great-little  tra- 
dition dichotomy. 

It  should  be  clear  that  Sirkanda  is  not  unique  in  its  deviation  from 
the  literate  tradition  as  evidenced  in  the  religious  beliefs  and  practices 
of  its  members.  Researchers  have  found  similar  circumstances  in  other 
Indian  villages  (for  example,  Opler,  1958,  pp.  553  f.). 

Historically,  it  is  suggested  by  many  writers  from  the  time  of  Manu, 
the  Hindu  lawgiver,  to  the  present,  that  Paharis  of  the  high  castes 
(that  is,  Khasas)  came  from  a  culture  that  was  once  more  highly  San- 
skritized  than  at  present,  but  which  fell  away  from  the  practices  and 


CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES  139 

beliefs  that  define  this  term.  The  decline  is  attributed  to  a  combina- 
tion of  the  exigencies  of  life  in  the  hills  and  the  intimate  contact  which 
the  Khasas  are  supposed  to  have  had  with  the  subjugated  indigenes 
and  their  "inferior"  religion.  It  is  interesting  to  note  the  extent  to 
which  local  historians  credit  the  lowly  Doms,  who  were  presumably 
so  readily  overpowered  by  the  Khasas,  with  having  altered  or  even 
revolutionized  the  way  of  life  and  religion  of  these  allegedly  pristine 
Hindus.  Another  view  is  that  these  high-caste  hill  people  represent  a 
relatively  untouched  and  unchanged  survival  of  antediluvian  Aryan 
culture.  It  seems  probable  that  in  reality  the  Paharis  are  the  product 
of  mixture  between  the  early  Khasas  and  Doms  (if  indeed  they  were 
different  cultural  groups)  and  more  recent  immigrants.  Pahari  religion, 
like  the  rest  of  their  culture,  is  the  product  of  gradual  change  in  an 
area  of  relative  isolation  where  they  have  been  out  of  direct  contact 
with  many  of  the  influences  important  in  shaping  Hinduism  on  the 
plains.  Beliefs  and  practices  have  been  influenced  by  their  cultural 
heritage  and  by  contacts  with  peoples  of  the  plains  and  the  higher 
Himalayas. 

There  is  an  increasing  trend  toward  religious  change  on  the  model 
of  high-caste  plains  Hinduism  at  all  caste  levels  in  and  around  Sir- 
kanda.  There  has  long  been  awareness  of  plains  ways  through  contacts 
with  educated  Brahmins,  merchants,  government  officials,  and  others 
knowledgeable  in  the  great  traditions  of  Hinduism.  Recently  with 
improved  means  of  communication,  increased  movement  of  people 
between  the  hills  and  plains,  more  easily  available  schooling,  and  in- 
creased financial  capabilities,  this  awareness  has  increased,  resulting 
in  an  active  tendency  toward  emulation.  The  motivation  is  simply  to 
be  respected  by  plains  people,  for  Paharis  increasingly  feel  the  effects 
of  their  unorthodox  religious  and  social  practices  as  a  result  of  their 
increasing  contacts  with  people  adhering  to  plains  values,  especially 
with  people  in  positions  of  authority  or  influence.  Paharis  are  con- 
sidered to  be  rustic,  degraded  Hindus  by  most  plainsmen.  Plains 
Brahmins  and  Rajputs  often  reject  the  caste  status  claims  of  their 
Pahari  caste-fellows,  largely  because  of  their  unorthodoxy.  By  adopting 
some  of  the  symbols  of  plains  culture,  Paharis  hope  to  improve  their 
status  in  the  eyes  of  the  plains  people.  Instrumental  in  this  change  have 
been  those  Paharis  who  have  had  the  most  extensive  and  intensive  ex- 
posure to  orthodox  plains  viewpoints  and  who  feel  their  status  most 
threatened  by  invidious  comparisons.  These  are  the  high  castes  and 
especially  the  Brahmins.  They  have  been  active  in  effecting  the  most 
obvious  changes  in  this  trend:  Sanskritization  of  marriage  customs, 
adoption  of  other  Sanskritic  rituals  and  festivals,  and  attribution  of 


140  CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

Sanskritic  interpretations  to  traditional  Pahari  religious  beliefs  and 
practices.  The  trend  is  similar  to  the  process  of  Sanskritization  or  status 
emulation  widely  documented  among  tribal  and  low-caste  groups  else- 
where in  India. 

Few  Paharis  have  adopted  the  modern  values  and  ideas  associated 
with  education,  urban  living,  and  cash  economy  that  have  been  adopted 
by  some  plains  people — especially  those  of  the  higher  castes — and  that 
have  been  termed  "Westernization"  by  Srinivas  (1956;  cf.  Cohn,  1955). 
The  reasons  are  very  similar  to  those  which  account  for  the  fact  that, 
when  high  castes  adopt  modern  aspirations  and  values,  low-caste  plains 
groups  adopt  Sanskritic  behaviors  formerly  denied  them  rather  than 
following  the  high  castes  in  the  new  life.  These  groups  have  differential 
experience  and  different  reference  groups — in  short,  different  sources 
of  values  and  aspirations.  High-caste  people  of  the  plains  have  bene- 
fited from  the  results  of  increased  educational  and  employment  oppor- 
tunities in  the  new  context,  while  Paharis,  like  low  castes  of  the  plains, 
have  benefited  less.  In  fact,  the  latter  groups  have  had  little  opportunity 
even  to  learn  the  modern,  Western  culture  within  which  such  benefits 
can  be  realized.  It  is  a  basic  axiom  of  reference  group  theory  that,  if 
one  group  is  to  identify  with  another  so  that  its  members  adopt  the 
outlook,  and  judge  themselves  by  the  standards,  of  the  other  group, 
there  must  be  both  knowledge  of  the  identification  group  and  some 
perceived  similarity  or  equivalence  to  it  (Merton  and  Kitt,  1950,  p.  61). 
Among  many  high-caste  plains  people,  travel,  education,  and  employ- 
ment have  resulted  in  familiarity  with  modern  ways  and  competence  in 
them  which  make  possible  perceived  similarities  and  subsequent  iden- 
tification with  extra-traditional  groups.  Adoption  of  new  values  and 
aspirations  to  the  relative  neglect  of  traditional  Sanskritic  values  and 
aspirations  has  followed. 

Meanwhile  Paharis,  like  low-caste  groups  of  the  plains,  have  lacked 
equivalent  facilities  and  experience  for  acquiring  the  knowledge  and 
competence  prerequisite  to  adoption  of  nontraditional  reference  groups. 
In  Sirkanda  cultural,  physical,  and  intellectual  isolation  have  in  all 
castes  militated  against  adoption  of  new  alien  reference  groups  to  any 
significant  extent.  Plains  people  have  long  served  as  something  of  a 
reference  group  for  Paharis  and  have  long  been  known  to  them.  In- 
creased contact  has  resulted  in  increased  knowledge  of  their  view- 
points. This,  combined  with  increased  wealth,  has  enabled  Paharis  to 
push  toward  higher  status  in  their  eyes  by  emulating  them.  Since  Pahari 
experience  has  been  for  the  most  part  with  plains  people  who  advocate 
a  traditional  Hindu  world  view,  emulation  has  been  in  this  direction. 
For  low-caste  plains  people  the  enabling  feature  for  upward  mobility 


CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES  141 

has  been  decreased  downward  pressure  from  the  high  castes,  as  well  as 
increased  financial  capability  and  social  justice.  For  both  the  Paharis 
and  the  plains  low  castes,  it  is  the  high  castes  of  the  plains  in  their 
traditional  role  who  form  the  reference  groups,  for  they  are  sufficiently 
known,  understood,  and  envied  for  the  other  groups  to  identify  with 
them  and  seek  to  emulate  them.  From  the  Pahari  point  of  view,  modern, 
urban,  or  Westernized  society  is  simply  too  alien  to  be  emulated.  Tra- 
ditional plains  culture  is  a  familiar  and  increasingly  attainable  ref- 
erence point. 

There  has  been  little  caste  differential  in  the  "plainsward  mobility" 
of  Paharis.  This  is  partly  because  of  the  cross-caste  cultural  homogene- 
ity of  Paharis  of  this  area  and  the  fact  that  there  has  been  relatively 
little  difference  from  caste  to  caste  in  opportunity  to  acquire  outside 
reference  groups.  High  castes  have  had  only  slightly  better  opportu- 
nities for  education  and  close  contact  with  educated  Brahmins  than 
have  low  castes.  Low  castes  have  had  as  much  or  more  per  capita  out- 
side contact  as  they  travel  to  trade  and  procure  the  tools  and  materials 
of  their  trades.  High  castes  have  had  significantly  greater  financial 
capability  to  carry  out  Sanskritization  by  performing  expensive  rituals 
under  the  supervision  of  educated  Brahmins,  and  it  is  in  this  respect 
that  high  and  low  castes  differ  most.  But  due  to  the  intensive  nature 
of  intercaste  interaction  in  the  Pahari  context,  low  castes  have  been 
fully  aware  of  the  practices  of  their  caste  superiors  and  follow  them 
insofar  as  they  are  financially  able.  It  could  perhaps  be  asserted  that 
low  castes  emulate  their  high-caste  neighbors  while  the  latter  are  emu- 
lating a  plains  model.  If  so,  the  time  lag  is  so  short  as  to  be  unnotice- 
able;  it  is  as  if  both  were  emulating  the  plains  model.  Both  groups  are 
explicit  in  attributing  their  practices  to  the  plains  model. 

Another  factor  in  the  cross-caste  nature  of  Pahari  Sanskritization 
may  be  the  fact  that  high  castes  have  not  felt  a  threat  of  imminently 
successful  low-caste  upward  mobility.  They  have  therefore  not  felt  the 
necessity  of  seeking  Westernization  as  an  alternative  source  of  hier- 
archical supremacy,  a  motivation  for  Westernization  suggested  by 
Gould  (1961a). 

Therefore,  while  the  picture  of  changing  caste  status  on  the  plains 
is  often  one  of  the  low  castes  moving  up  in  the  Sanskritic  caste-status 
hierarchy  as  the  higher,  more  advantaged  castes  move  out  of  this  hier- 
archy into  a  non-Sanskritic  milieu,  in  Sirkanda  the  picture  is  of  the 
entire  Pahari  community  attempting  to  move  toward  the  ways  of  their 
plains  reference  group  while  castes  within  the  community  retain  their 
relative  status  positions.  This  is  not  to  deny  some  cases  of  new  non- 
Sanskritic  aspirations  in  Sirkanda.  Neither  is  it  to  deny  ambitions  of 


I«li! 


142  CALENDRICAL   AND    LIFE-CYCLE    CEREMONIES 

upward  mobility  and  competitive  scrambling  for  status  among  the 
lower  castes  in  this  area.  These  occur,  for  example,  among  the  Bajgis, 
whose  women  have  given  up  dancing  for  the  public  in  order  to  raise 
their  status,  and  among  the  Bedas,  who,  in  the  present  generation, 
would  like  to  follow  suit.  It  can  be  asserted,  however,  that  the  dominant 
trend  is  a  society-wide  movement  toward  what  is  viewed  as  the  re- 
ligious context  of  the  plains  in  order  to  win  the  respect  of  members  of 
that  dominant  group. 


KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP 


Previous  chapters  have  described  the  relationship  of  men  to  their 
natural  environment  in  Sirkanda  and  to  the  supernatural  world  which 
impinges  upon  them.  This  and  the  following  three  chapters  will  de- 
scribe and  analyze  the  interrelationships  among  people  in  and  around 
Sirkanda.  An  attempt  will  be  made  to  describe  and  distinguish  ideal 
patterns  of  social  behavior  as  expressed  by  informants  and  actual  pat- 
terns of  behavior  as  observed  and  reported.  Similarly,  an  attempt  will 
be  made  to  distinguish  between  what  is  believed  and  done,  and  what 
people  would  like  outsiders  to  think  is  believed  and  done  (cf.  Berre- 
man,  1962c). 

Here,  as  in  preceding  chapters,  the  way  of  life  of  the  residents  of 
this  village  and  the  culture  area  it  represents  is  compared  with  that  of 
villages  in  other  parts  of  India. 

From  the  point  of  view  of  social  life,  the  whole  of  the  cis-Himalayan 
region  behaves  as  a  culture  area,  as  there  is  a  homogeneous  social  code  to 
which  both  the  higher  and  lower  groups  subscribe.  .  .  .  But  the  hill  culture 
differs  from  that  of  the  plains  and  all  cultures  that  surround  them.  .  .  . 
(Majumdar,  1944,  p.  139) 

It  will  become  evident  that  basic  similarities  accompany  important 
differences,  and  it  is  essential  that  these  be  presented  for  comparative 
purposes.  A  basic  aim,  throughout  this  account,  is  to  throw  light  on 
the  role  of  kin  groups,  castes,  and  community  organization  in  the  lives 
of  the  people  under  discussion. 


144  KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP 

Basically  Sirkanda  shares  the  social  structure  of  Hindu  Indian  so- 
ciety. Family,  caste,  and  community  are  the  most  significant  social 
units. 

The  discussion  will  begin  with  the  extended  family  or  household, 
the  economically  cooperating  residential  kin  group  and  the  most  inti- 
mate, immediate  social  unit  in  Sirkanda.  From  the  residential  kin 
group  the  discussion  will  proceed  to  its  extensions  in  consanguineal  and 
affinal  kin  groups,  to  castes,  and  finally  to  the  community  and  its  ex- 
tensions. It  is  impossible  to  understand  the  functioning  of  Sirkanda 
society  at  any  of  these  levels  without  reference  to  the  others.  The 
system  is  an  interdependent  one  which  does  not  operate  on  independ- 
ent subcircuits.  Choice  of  family  as  a  starting  point  for  presentation  is, 
therefore,  largely  arbitrary  and  perhaps  stems  from  an  inductive  bias. 

A  further  qualification  should  be  inserted.  In  Sirkanda,  as  in  most 
Indian  villages,  there  are  differences  in  internal  social  organization 
among  various  castes.  They  are  less  in  the  Pahari  area  than  in  many 
others  and  by  comparison  they  may  seem  almost  insignificant,  but 
they  do  exist.  Since  87  per  cent  of  the  population  of  Sirkanda  is  of  one 
caste — Rajputs — more  reliable  data  were  obtained  regarding  that  caste 
than  any  other.  However,  caste  differences  were  a  special  focus  of  the 
research  and  were  sought  out  whenever  possible.  Such  differences  as 
were  revealed  have  been  reported  here.  Differences  not  mentioned  did 
not  exist  or  were  not  obtained  in  investigation  aimed  at  detecting 
them. 

Family 

As  the  Wisers  (1951,  p.  160)  have  commented,  "no  villager  thinks 
of  himself  apart  from  his  family."  Ideally  the  basic  residential,  social, 
religious,  and  economic  unit  in  Sirkanda  is  the  patrilocal  extended 
family.  This  consists  of  a  man,  his  wife,  his  sons,  and  their  wives  and 
children  plus  any  unmarried  daughters.  In  Sirkanda  this  unit  is  sup- 
posed to  occupy  a  house,  preferably  with  a  separate  sleeping  room  for 
each  nuclear  family  consisting  of  man,  wife,  and  children.  It  is  an 
economic  unit  which  includes  fathers,  sons,  and  brothers  and  their 
wives  and  unmarried  daughters,  and  therefore  may  be  termed  a  "joint 
family."  All  members  share  in  the  family  occupation  and  in  the  product 
obtained.  All  eat  from  the  same  hearth — a  distinguishing  feature  rec- 
ognized by  the  people  themselves,  who  refer  to  this  family  unit  or 
household  as  the  chula  (cooking  hearth).  The  eldest  active  male  is  the 
family  head  and  bears  final  responsibility  and  authority  for  family 
well-being.  The  wife  of  the  eldest  male,  whether  he  is  living  or  not,  is 
the  head  of  the  female  component  (wives  and  unmarried  daughters)  of 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  145 

the  household  in  domestic  matters.  She  becomes  the  titular  head  of  the 
household  upon  her  husband's  death  if  there  are  no  brothers  to  take 
over,  but  generally  a  son  acts  in  her  stead.  Within  the  component  nu- 
clear families  the  age  and  sex  hierarchy  is  the  same. 

I.  Largest  household  in  Sirkanda  (Rajput):  Four  dwellings 

chan 

---*""       "r^ 7^1 ix\ 

0=A      \  .  u  /    0=A=0  0=A     \ 

\        chan         chan  /  ,  , 

f    1 ' 1 — 1 — w — n-/ 1  \      \         n  / 

lp=A         O        0=A        0=A     \|0=A      fO=Al        \         O    A  / 

I  I       H       /  /  ^_  ^ 

rn       1 — I — 1   1 
^^       o  A    a  o  a; 


/ 


\ 
\ 
v. 


E.  Medium  (Rajput):  Single  dwelling  m.  Small  (Rajput):  Single  dwelling 

^  I  v  /       I     I 

/      r Lr  i  1  o=A/ 

/     0=A  0=A  A/  \         / 

\0  A   O  A  / 


12.  Atypical  (Rajput):  Two  dwellings 

I T^H 

•=A         ,-"    0=A         chan 

/  \\     s' ~^ 


•=A/  0  =  A-0  (A) Hired  servant 

(  A"    ^ov^ 


^ec»   /      ^. ^y 


Adeceased  ancestor     Aliving  household  member 

Fig.  2.  Household  composition  and  residence.  Residence  in  a  single  dwelling 
is  indicated  by  a  broken  line. 

In  Sirkanda  there  are  several  types  of  deviation  from  this  ideal 
pattern  (see  fig.  2).  As  has  been  mentioned  previously,  most  households 
(37  of  45,  or  82  per  cent)  own  houses  or  chans  outside  of  Sirkanda. 
Twenty-five  of  these  joint  families,  55  per  cent  of  those  in  the  village, 
are  continually  or  usually  split  into  two  or  more  residential  units  be- 


146  KIN    GROUPS   AND    KINSHIP 

cause  of  regular  occupancy  of  chans  or  second  houses  away  from  the 
village.  Therefore,  in  over  half  the  joint  families  the  basic  family 
economic  unit  is  not  a  residential  unit,  as  villagers  say  it  ideally 
should  be.  The  extended  family  may  become  permanently  divided, 
and  more  distant  households  may  sever  connections  with  the  village. 
As  has  been  noted,  approximately  one-fifth  of  the  living  adult  males 
who  appear  in  Sirkanda  genealogical  materials  do  not  appear  as  mem- 
bers of  Sirkanda  households  at  present.  They  have  severed  village  and 
joint-family  ties. 

Between  one-third  and  one-fourth  of  the  family  units  (13  of  45,  or 
29  per  cent)  consists  only  of  a  nuclear  family  or  a  single  individual. 
Seven  more  consist  only  of  a  nuclear  family  and  a  parent  of  the  hus- 
band (a  "minimal  extended  family").  In  these  20  small  family  units 
there  are  99  individuals,  while  among  the  25  larger  family  units  are 
the  remaining  285  Sirkanda  residents.  Thus,  over  one-third  of  all 
Sirkanda  residents  live  in  family  units  much  smaller  than  the  ideal. 
Ten  of  the  large  units  are  fraternal  joint  families,  consisting  of  brothers 
and  their  dependents,  while  15  include  one  or  both  of  an  elder  man- 
wife  couple  and  their  sons,  daughters-in-law,  unmarried  daughters,  and 
grandchildren. 

Household  membership  ranges  from  1  to  25  individuals  with  an 
average  between  8  and  9.  Thirteen  households  have  10  or  over;  thir- 
teen have  5  or  under.  Household  membership  spans  four  generations  in 
1  case,  three  generations  in  25  cases,  two  generations  in  14  cases,  and 
one  generation  in  5  cases.  In  only  4  cases  have  real  brothers  divided 
into  separate  households.  In  1  case  the  only  half-brothers  currently 
in  the  village  without  a  living  father  did  so,  and  in  2  cases  father-son 
divisions  have  occurred.  In  the  latter  instances  the  sons  with  their 
fathers'  approval  took  advantage  of  chances  for  adoption  into  heirless 
families.  Half-brothers  quite  consistently  divide  their  father's  prop- 
erty upon  his  death  and  establish  separate  joint-family  households. 
Real  brothers  of  the  same  mother  rarely  divide  joint  property,  but 
the  relatively  landless  low  castes  do  so  more  frequently  than  the  high 
castes.  Of  the  four  current  cases,  two  are  in  low-caste  families — the  only 
low-caste  brothers,  with  father  deceased,  in  Sirkanda — while  only  two 
are  in  the  high  castes,  of  twelve  possibilities  in  that  group. 

One  of  the  most  prominent  differences  between  high  and  low  castes 
in  Sirkanda  is  in  joint  family  size  and  composition.  Not  only  do  low- 
caste  brothers  usually  divide  their  property  when  their  father  dies 
whereas  high-caste  brothers  retain  it  intact,  but  low-caste  people  char- 
acteristically live  in  smaller  joint  family  units.  This  is  indicated  in 
table  2.  The  differences  are  perhaps  attributable  more  to  economic 


KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP  147 

conditions  than  to  caste.  All  three  of  the  low-caste  extended  family 
households  are  dependent  in  large  part  on  agriculture,  while  none  of 
the  low-caste  nuclear  households  has  land  to  till.  Agriculture  requires 
many  hands  to  make  it  productive,  and  it  will  feed  many  mouths.  Two 
low-caste  brothers,  each  the  head  of  a  good-sized  extended  family,  have 
divided  their  lands  and  clients,  but  they  perform  one  economic  func- 
tion jointly  where  teamwork  is  requisite,  namely  drumming.  Thus  it 
seems  that  larger  joint  families  are  usually  retained  when  it  is  ad- 
vantageous or  necessary  to  do  so,  and  they  break  down  more  readily 
when  they  perform  no  useful  or  necessary  function. 

TABLE  2 

Sirkanda  Population  by  Family  Types 

Households  Population 

Extended         Nuclear  Extended         Nuclear 

families  families  families  families 

High  castes  30  9  306  40 

Low  castes  3  4  22  16 

Division  of  a  household  generally  takes  place  among  first  cousins 
(brothers'  sons).  In  no  current  cases  do  such  first  cousins  belong  to  the 
same  household  unless  their  parents  are  living.  Thus,  the  division  of 
the  extended  family  into  smaller  units  occurs  quite  consistently  after 
the  third  generation;  that  is,  brothers  do  not  often  divide  their  father's 
property,  but  when  the  brothers  die  their  offspring  (first  cousins)  do 
divide  it.  This  conforms  to  the  ideal  pattern. 

It  is  worth  noting  in  this  connection  that  in  nine  of  the  13  nuclear 
family  household  units  there  is  no  other  nuclear  family  related  to  the 
household  head  more  closely  than  at  the  first  cousin  level,  the  level 
at  which  division  of  the  family  is  to  be  expected.  Therefore,  in  only 
four  cases  can  the  nuclear  family  be  called  a  voluntarily  or  prematurely 
segmented  social  and  economic  unit.  Two  of  these  households  are 
those  of  blacksmith  brothers  and  one  is  that  of  a  Rajput  who  moved 
to  his  wife's  house  to  acquire  her  inheritance.  In  the  other  nine  cases, 
segmentation  has  resulted  from  necessity  brought  about  either  by  dif- 
ferential birth  and  death  rates  or  by  the  custom  of  dividing  property 
in  the  third  generation.  Likewise,  only  one  of  the  seven  minimal  ex- 
tended families  is  minimal  by  choice.  One  Rajput  household  head 
expressed  a  common  attitude: 

These  days  in  some  of  the  families  when  boys  become  young  men  and  are 
married  they  think  of  breaking  away  from  the  joint  family.  In  my  family 
my  younger  brother  and  I  never  thought  of  separating.  Of  course,  now  that 


148  KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP 

our  father  is  dead  we  don't  know  how  things  will  take  shape.  But  we  like 
the  joint  family  system.  I  sometimes  feel  overburdened  being  in  charge  of 
such  a  big  family,  but  the  household  work,  agricultural  work,  and  tending 
the  cattle  is  done  very  smoothly  as  there  are  enough  people  to  take  care  of 
it  all.  If  there  are  only  two  or  three  people  in  a  family  they  just  don't  know 
how  to  take  care  of  all  of  the  agricultural  and  other  work.  They  don't  know 
where  to  leave  their  children  when  they  go  to  work  in  the  fields  or  to  bring 
firewood  and  grass. 

In  the  above  figures  on  household  size  and  composition  I  have  in- 
cluded "polygamous  families"  with  nuclear  families.  A  polygamous 
family  is  made  up  of  more  than  one  nuclear  family  linked  by  a  com- 
mon spouse  (Murdock,  1949,  p.  2).  In  Sirkanda  these  are  polygynous 
— multiple  wives  and  a  single  husband — and  generally  with  only  two 
wives.  Murdock  calls  both  extended  and  polygamous  families  "com- 
posite" families,  as  distinguished  from  nuclear  ones  (Murdock,  1949, 
pp.  23  ff.).  I  have  lumped  the  polygynous  and  nuclear  types  simply 
because  in  Sirkanda  only  a  man-woman  or  man-women  combination 
is  a  family.  A  man  and  woman  are  potentially  an  independent  family 
unit;  an  additional  wife  is  not.  An  additional  wife  does  not  alter  the 
family  make-up  in  the  same  sense  that  another  nuclear  family  does. 
In  any  event,  there  are  currently  twelve  polygynous  families  in  Sir- 
kanda, ten  of  which  are  included  in  larger  joint  families.  Of  these  ten, 
two  have  only  a  dependent  parent  in  addition.  The  other  two  con- 
stitute households  in  themselves.  All  are  Rajputs  and  are  therefore 
landholding  families.  Seven  of  these  families  occupy  two  separate 
houses,  and  five  families  occupy  single  houses.  Size  of  the  extended 
family  is  apparently  the  most  important  factor  influencing  the  living 
arrangement  in  the  polygynous  families.  A  small  family  often  has  to 
separate  wives  into  different  locations  in  order  to  occupy  outlying 
dwellings,  whereas  larger  families  send  out  an  entire  nuclear  unit.  In 
all  five  cases  in  which  the  polygynous  family  constitutes  virtually  the 
entire  family  unit,  the  co-wives  and  their  children  occupy  separate 
dwellings.  In  all  five  cases  in  which  they  occupy  a  single  house  the  ex- 
tended family  is  large  enough  to  tend  its  chans  with  other  nuclear 
units.  This  leaves  two  cases  in  which  wives  are  separated  purely  out  of 
choice — a  frequently  cited  means  of  minimizing  co-wife  friction. 

Marriage  Regulations 

The  nuclear  family  is  established  as  a  result  of  marriage  customs 
described  in  the  preceding  chapter.  Joshi  summarizes  the  traits  of 
Khasa  marriage  which  distinguish  it  from  Brahamanical  Hindu  mar- 


KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP  149 

riage:  existence  of  levirate,  marriage  as  a  secular  transaction  involving 
bride  price,  religious  ceremony  unessential  for  marriage,  marriage 
dissolvable  by  mutual  consent,  remarriage  of  widows  and  divorcees 
recognized,  sacred  thread  ceremony  not  deemed  essential.  These  are 
characteristics  of  traditional  marriage  in  Sirkanda.  The  religious  cere- 
mony and  sacred  thread  ceremony  are  gaining  prominence  with  the 
increasing  trend  toward  Sanskritization  (Joshi,  1929,  pp.  50  f.).  Here 
I  will  use  the  term  "marriage"  very  loosely  to  designate  any  instance 
in  which  a  man  and  woman  live  openly  together  so  that  any  child  born 
of  the  woman  will  be  acknowledged  to  be  that  of  the  man  as  well. 

As  has  been  indicated,  the  ideal  marriage  is  one  between  a  previously 
unmarried  man  and  woman  with  appropriate  and  compatible  genea- 
logical and  astrological  credentials.  It  is  arranged  by  the  parents  of 
the  principals  without  their  direct  participation  and  at  the  initiative 
of  the  groom's  family. 

In  order  to  understand  marriage  regulations  it  will  be  necessary  to 
jump  ahead  of  the  discussion  and  comment  briefly  upon  two  impor- 
tant social  units  more  inclusive  than  the  family.  The  largest  of  these 
is  the  caste  or  jdt  (jati  in  Hindi),  which  has  frequently  been  mentioned 
in  earlier  chapters  and  which  functions  much  as  it  does  over  the  rest 
of  India.  It  is  the  endogamous  unit — the  unit  within  which  marriages 
should  always  be  contracted.  In  fact,  its  extent  may  be  defined  by  the 
extent  of  marriage  ties.  The  other  unit  relevant  to  marriage  is  also 
called  jat  or  jati  by  villagers  but  is  here  termed  sib  (cf.  Lowie,  1947, 
p.  111;  Murdock,  1949,  p.  47).  This  is  a  subgroup  of  the  caste  and  is 
composed  of  assumed  consanguineal  relatives.  It  is  exogamous — its 
members  are  not  potential  mates.1  Neither,  according  to  the  rules 
followed  in  this  area,  are  people  potential  mates  if  their  mothers  (or, 
ideally,  other  maternal  ancestors  for  several  generations  back)  are  of 
the  same  sib.  Caste  is  virtually  universal  in  India,  while  sibs  occur 
primarily  among  the  higher  castes.  In  Sirkanda  the  low  castes  claim 
to  have  a  sib  structure,  although  their  sibs  are  somewhat  less  consist- 
ently and  uniformly  defined  than  those  of  the  high  castes.  Another 
feature  of  marriage  in  Sirkanda,  as  in  most  of  India,  is  that  it  is  nor- 
mally patrilocal — the  bride  goes  to  live  at  the  home  of  her  husband 
and  his  family. 

In  practice  it  is  found  that  these  rules  are  followed  quite  rigidly  in 
first  marriages,  arranged  by  the  parents  with  the  advice  of  Brahmins. 
The  rules  are  less  consistently  obeyed  in  subsequent  marriages,  which 
are  often  informally  contracted,  and  may  even  omit  bride-price. 

A  total  of  471  marriages  were  recorded  in  genealogical  materials 
collected  in  Sirkanda — 390  high-caste  and  81  low-caste  marriages.  Of 


150  KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP 

this  number,  300  were  marriages  of  village  men  (that  is,  sons  of  the 
village)  and  143  of  these  were  marriages  of  men  who  are  living  and 
currently  identified  as  Sirkanda  villagers.2  For  most  purposes  the  300 
total  is  most  useful  in  that  it  is  large  and  is  associated  with  accurate 
data.  Data  on  village  women's  marriages,  except  those  on  location  of 
spouse's  village,  are  not  complete  enough  to  warrant  their  use. 

Multiple  Marriages 

Ninety-six  of  300  unions,  32  per  cent,  were  second  or  subsequent 
marriages.  These  were  almost  evenly  divided  between  polygynous 
unions  and  nonpolygynous  or  sequential  unions  (that  is,  in  which  first 
wife  died  or  left  before  the  second  marriage).  It  is  probable  that  in 
this  accounting  the  number  of  nonpolygynous  plural  marriages  are 
underreported  because  there  is  a  tendency  to  overlook  first  wives,  es- 
pecially if  they  were  childless  and  either  left  or  died  early  in  marriage. 
This  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  in  the  figures  for  living  Sirkanda  men 
such  cases  outnumber  polygynous  ones  by  one-third,  while  in  the  total 
figures  there  is  a  slight  preponderance  of  polygynous  marriages.  It 
therefore  seems  likely  that  around  40  per  cent  of  all  marital  unions  are 
second  or  subsequent  ones  for  the  man.  Polygynous  marriages  consist- 
ently form  about  15  per  cent  of  all  unions. 

Polygyny  involving  more  than  two  wives  is  rare.  Only  four  cases  are 
reported  in  the  genealogical  materials,  although  it  is  likely  that  some 
cases  stemming  from  inheritance  of  additional  wives  have  gone  un- 
reported. Polygyny  and  nonpolygynous  plural  marriages  have  occurred 
in  all  castes  represented  in  Sirkanda.  No  significant  caste  differences 
appear,  but  there  is  a  tendency  toward  more  polygyny  among  the  high 
castes  than  among  the  low  castes.  This  tendency  may  relate  to  the 
greater  usefulness  of  extra  wives  in  agricultural  households  than  in 
others  and  the  fact  that  extra  wives  can  evidently  pay  their  way  in 
labor  more  effectively  in  agriculture  than  in  the  specialized  occupa- 
tions. 

Since  the  people  of  the  area  are  widely  reputed  in  India  to  be  polyg- 
amous, some  special  inquiry  was  directed  toward  determining  the 
extent  and  nature  of  such  marital  arrangements.  In  the  process  some 
detailed  information  about  marriage  in  general  was  obtained.  I  have 
already  indicated  that  polyandry  is  not  at  all  practiced  here  as  it  is  in 
neighboring  Jaunsar-Bawar.  In  the  discussion  of  intrafamily  relations 
it  will  become  evident,  however,  that  there  is  not  as  much  difference 
as  might  be  expected  in  the  sexual  arrangements  within  the  family  in 
these  two  areas  (cf.  Berreman,  1962a). 

I  have  shown  in  the  above  discussion  that  polygynous  unions  are 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  151 

permitted  and  occur  with  a  frequency  of  about  15  per  cent.  Twelve 
established  polygynous  families  and  one  de  facto  case  on  the  verge  of 
public  recognition  were  observed  in  some  detail  in  Sirkanda.  They  were 
the  total  current  cases  wherein  all  the  principals  were  alive  and  par- 
ticipating in  the  marriage.  All  were  Rajputs. 

Reasons  given  for  polygyny  in  particular  cases  were  four:  (1)  to 
produce  children  when  the  first  wife  has  been  barren,  (2)  to  help  with 
the  work,  (3)  for  "pleasure,"  (4)  inheritance  of  an  additional  wife  from 
a  deceased  brother. 

In  eight  cases  of  polygyny  in  Sirkanda  the  first  two  reasons  were 
given  in  combination.  The  work  contributed  by  the  second  wife  was 
stressed  in  each  of  these  cases,  but  sterility  of  the  first  wife  was  appar- 
ently the  primary  motivation.  In  one  of  the  cases  the  woman  herself 
asked  that  another  wife  be  brought  for  these  two  reasons,  and  it  was 
her  father  who  made  the  necessary  arrangements  to  secure  a  distant 
classificatory  sister  as  her  co-wife.  In  another  case  the  husband  was  in- 
clined to  repeated  marriages — he  had  had  four  previous  wives — but 
had  produced  no  children  and  claimed  to  need  two  women  at  a  time 
to  take  care  of  the  work. 

One  villager  commented, 

A  wife  is  a  valuable  asset  here.  Here  the  wife  takes  care  of  her  husband  in 
many  ways,  and  she  does  much  of  the  work  of  the  household.  Therefore,  two 
wives  are  better  than  one.  In  your  country  and  in  the  plains  the  husband 
has  to  support  the  woman,  so  a  second  wife  is  a  hardship  and  a  luxury. 

Atkinson  (1886,  p.  255)  says  that  in  Garhwal  "the  custom  probably 
arose  from  the  great  difficulty  there  was  in  cultivating  the  large  amount 
of  waste  land  available.  Wives  were  procured  to  help  in  field 
work.  .  .  ." 

In  three  cases  in  Sirkanda  "pleasure"  was  given  as  the  reason  for 
taking  a  second  wife;  that  is,  there  was  no  question  of  need  for  more 
workers  or  more  children  in  the  family.  In  two  cases  wives  were  in- 
herited from  elder  brothers.  In  one  of  these  cases  a  man  inherited  two 
wives  from  his  brother  and  already  had  one  of  his  own.  He  had  not 
declared  that  the  widows  were  his  wives,  though  in  fact  they  were, 
and  one  of  the  inherited  wives  had  borne  a  son  by  him.  It  was  ex- 
pected that  the  relationship  would  soon  be  publicly  acknowledged, 
especially  in  view  of  the  fact  that  one  of  the  inherited  wives  had 
moved  from  her  deceased  husband's  house  to  that  of  his  brother 
shortly  before  my  departure.  In  two  additional  cases  a  man  got  his 
second  wife  from  a  living  brother.  In  one  case  the  husband  acqui- 
esced when  his  wife  declared  her  intention  to  leave  and  expressed 


152  KIN    GROUPS   AND    KINSHIP 

her  desire  to  marry  her  husband's  brother.  In  the  other  case  the  man 
simply  took  over  the  wife  of  his  younger  brother,  lived  with  her  and 
his  first  wife  in  a  chan,  and  fathered  a  son  by  her.  After  the  birth 
of  the  son  and  an  announcement  by  the  household  head  (a  still  older 
brother),  she  became  publicly  known  as  his  wife.  At  that  time  the 
younger  brother  was  promised  a  new  wife. 

Fifteen  of  the  27  women  in  these  polygynous  marriages  were  virgins 
(that  is,  previously  unmarried)  at  marriage.  The  twelve  nonvirgins 
included  the  five  procured  from  brothers  (three  inherited,  two  taken) 
and  seven  divorcees.  There  is  a  significant  difference  in  the  incidence 
of  virgin  brides  among  first,  as  compared  to  second,  wives  in  these 
polygynous  unions.  Ten  first  wives  were  virgins  and  three  were  non- 
virgins,  while  five  second  wives  were  virgins  and  nine  were  nonvirgins. 
Although  three  cases  of  inheritance  account  for  three  of  the  nonvirgin 
second  wives,  there  is  still  a  marked  tendency  to  accept  previously 
married  brides  as  second  wives  and  to  reject  them  as  first  wives.  There 
is  also  a  preference  for  marrying  a  virgin  daughter  to  a  single  man. 

In  22  of  the  27  marriages  in  these  13  families,  bride-price  payment 
was  made  at  the  time  of  marriage  either  to  the  bride's  family  or  to  a 
former  husband,  while  in  only  one  case,  a  first  marriage,  was  a  dowry 
given  instead.  The  remaining  four  cases  were  those  of  wives  obtained 
from  a  brother  and  involved  no  exchange  of  money. 

Marriage  ceremonies  were  performed  in  seven  of  the  13  initial  mar- 
riages which  established  families  destined  to  become  polygynous.  All 
seven  were  among  the  10  with  virgin  brides.  This  conforms  to  the 
village  ratio:  about  50  per  cent  of  all  marriages  have  been  without 
benefit  of  ceremony,  and  ceremonies  are  performed  only  when  the 
bride  is  previously  unmarried. 

Second  marriages  are  less  often  ceremonialized  than  first  ones.  Of 
the  14  second  marriages  (that  is,  those  which  made  the  family  polyg- 
ynous), only  two  were  ceremonialized,  and  both  of  these  were  among 
the  five  such  marriages  which  involved  virgin  brides.  Intervals  be- 
tween marriages  ranged  from  two  to  20  years.  In  six  marriages  the 
co-wives  normally  shared  a  house  or  chan  as  residence,  and  in  seven 
marriages  they  were  separated.3 

Three  of  the  thirteen  instances  of  polygyny  were  sororal — sisters 
married  to  the  same  man.  Two  pairs  of  co-wives  were  real  sisters  and 
the  other  pair  were  classificatory  sisters  (daughters  of  first  cousins  re- 
lated through  the  male  line). 

Levirate,  or  inheritance  of  wives  from  a  brother,  is  standard  pro- 
cedure here.  Either  an  elder  or  younger  brother  may  inherit  at  the  dis- 
cretion of  the  household  head,  who  is  usually  the  eldest  surviving 


KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP  153 

brother.  Although  no  preference  for  junior  levirate  was  expressed  in 
Sirkanda,  it  is  most  frequent,  probably  because  elder  brothers  tend 
to  die  first.  If  an  outsider  wishes  to  marry  the  widow,  he  must  secure 
permission  and  reimburse  her  husband's  family.  This,  too,  is  frequently 
done.  Elopement  is  another  frequent  means  by  which  a  widow  marries 
the  man  of  her  choice.  A  boy  who  has  been  betrothed  and  then  dies 
may  be  replaced  by  his  brother  to  fulfill  the  marital  contract.  There  is 
no  evidence  of  the  systematic  practice  of  sororate,  wherein  a  deceased 
woman  is  replaced  by  her  single  sister  in  the  marital  union.  Two  or  three 
isolated  instances  occur  in  the  data.  Similarly,  there  are  isolated  instances 
of  brothers  marrying  women  who  are  sisters,  but  this  is  an  unusual  ar- 
rangement neither  encouraged  nor  discouraged. 

In  this  society  it  is  important  to  contract  proper  marriages  for  one's 
children.  Once  this  has  been  done,  regardless  of  what  may  happen 
subsequently,  the  honor  of  the  family  is  intact.  Danger  of  an  inter- 
caste  or  intra-sib  union  is  precluded  because  a  proper  match  has  been 
made.  If,  later,  a  proscribed  alliance  develops,  the  individuals  in- 
volved will  take  the  blame;  the  family  has  done  its  duty.  This  explains 
the  fact  that  no  deviations  from  rules  of  caste  endogamy  and 
sib  exogamy  were  found  or  reported  for  first  marriages  in  Sirkanda. 
Maintenance  of  family  honor  is  also  offered  as  an  explanation  for 
early  marriage.  Early  marriage  prevents  the  disgrace  of  an  unwed 
mother  or  nonvirginal  bride  because  no  girl  old  enough  for  child- 
bearing  or  adult  sex  activity  is  unwed.  That  she  may  have  relations 
with  various  men  and  perhaps  even  bear  children  by  them  in  the 
absence  of  her  husband  is  irrelevant — she  is  a  properly  married  woman. 
Virginity  at  first  marriage  is  important,  while  sex  behavior  thereafter 
is  unimportant.  As  one  man  put  it,  "We  disobey  the  law  [which  sets 
the  minimum  marriage  age  for  girls  at  fourteen],  but  we  protect  our 
honor."  As  a  result,  unwed  pregnant  girls  are  a  rarity.  When  they  are 
found  out  they  are  immediately  married  to  their  lover  if  possible,  or  to 
one  of  their  sisters'  husbands,  or  to  some  boy  whose  family  is  willing 
— usually  a  family  hard  pressed  to  find  a  bride  for  financial  or  other 
reasons.  Unwed  mothers  are  virtually  unknown.  The  nearest  approach 
to  unwed  motherhood  that  can  be  cited  in  the  village  is  the  occasional 
un-rewed  widow  who  bears  a  child,  to  the  consternation  of  her  family. 

First  marriages  for  women,  as  described  in  the  preceding  chapter, 
are  likely  to  be  accompanied  by  ceremony  and  public  acclaim.  Sub- 
sequent marriages  for  women  are  contracted  without  ceremony  and 
receive  little  attention,  though  they  do  receive  public  recognition  and 
approval.  Second  marriages  for  men  are  less  likely  to  be  ceremonialized 
than  first  ones.  In  second  marriages  which  run  counter  to  rules  of 


154  KIN    GROUPS    AND   KINSHIP 

endogamy  or  exogamy,  and  in  other  "love  marriages,"  the  couple 
usually  elopes  or  the  woman  comes  secretly  to  the  home  of  her  new 
husband  and  the  marriage  is  accepted  by  others  as  a  fait  accompli. 
Numerous  cases  of  this  kind  have  occurred  among  all  castes.  They  are 
frequent  bases  for  disputes,  sometimes  resulting  in  long-standing  fac- 
tional splits  involving  considerable  numbers  of  people. 

Endogamy 

Paharis  have  a  reputation  for  disregarding  the  rules  of  caste 
endogamy  and  other  orthodox  Hindu  marriage  regulations.  My  data 
indicate  that  in  this  region  the  reputation  is  undeserved  so  far  as 
initial  marriages  are  concerned  but  finds  corroboration  in  subsequent 
marriages.  While  no  deviations  occurred  among  first  marriages  in  Sir- 
kanda,  some  did  occur  in  second  or  subsequent  marriages.  The  num- 
bers of  such  deviations  are  not  large,  but  the  fact  that  they  exist  is 
important. 

In  Sirkanda  there  is  at  present  one  established  and  recognized  inter- 
caste  union — that  of  a  Rajput  man  and  a  Brahmin  woman  who  eloped. 
The  woman  came  to  the  man's  village  and  took  up  residence  with  him, 
and  he  then  reimbursed  her  former  husband,  a  Brahmin.  The  only 
long-range  effect  in  Sirkanda  was  estrangement  between  the  Rajput 
husband  and  his  brothers,  who  resented  his  bringing  a  Brahmin  woman 
into  the  family.  To  this  day  his  elder  brother  will  not  let  the  Brahmin 
woman  into  his  house,  nor  allow  her  to  address  him  as  "husband's 
elder  brother."  In  the  woman's  village  the  Brahmins  were  angry  but 
did  nothing  beyond  lodging  a  prompt  protest  and  threatening  to 
punish  physically  the  Rajput  who  took  this  woman.  There  is  a  sim- 
ilarly accepted  union  of  a  Brahmin  man  and  a  Rajput  woman  in  an- 
other Bhatbair  village. 

A  second  case  involving  a  Rajput  man  and  a  Brahmin  woman  in  a 
neighboring  village  was  terminated  by  public  pressure  after  a  council 
met  and  directed  that  the  woman  be  returned  to  her  former  husband 
and  the  abductor  pay  a  fine  (which  he  avoided  by  leaving  the  village). 
A  child  had  been  conceived  in  this  union,  and  there  was  talk  of  in- 
ducing an  abortion.  However,  when  the  father  left  and  the  woman 
settled  back  with  her  former  husband  the  idea  was  dropped.  The  child 
was  born  and  was  accepted  as  a  Brahmin — as  the  offspring  of  the  man 
and  wife  in  whose  household  it  was  born — despite  its  well-known  and 
undoubted  parentage.  The  Rajput  involved  was  a  well-known  "loafer" 
or  philanderer  who  had  left  more  than  one  wife  and  had  established 
unions  with  several  women,  including  a  low-caste  woman.  Moreover, 
he  had  taken  the  Brahmin  woman  far  away,  to  Delhi,  on  the  strength  of 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  1 55 

promises  which  were  never  fulfilled.  He  failed  to  provide  for  her  prop- 
erly and  allegedly  mistreated  her  and  sold  her  jewelry  for  his  own 
profit.  Had  he  been  a  stable  member  of  the  community,  it  is  likely  that 
little  sentiment  would  have  been  aroused  over  the  incident.  Normally 
feeling  does  not  run  high  in  such  cases.  As  a  Brahmin  commented  in 
the  council  meeting  to  resolve  this  case,  "There  is  not  much  differ- 
ence between  Rajputs  and  Brahmins,  so  it  doesn't  matter  very  much 
anyway."  On  the  other  hand  a  Rajput  was  apparently  incensed  and 
made  the  comment,  "A  Brahmin  woman  is  like  a  mother  to  Rajputs." 
The  latter  attitude  is  evidently  a  statement  of  ideal  rather  than  actual 
behavior. 

Unions  across  high-  and  low-caste  lines  meet  with  greater  public 
disapproval.  They  are  nearly  always  unions  of  high-caste  men  with 
low-caste  women;  the  reverse  is  violently  condemned  and  could  not  be 
continued  if  it  were  known.  In  Sirkanda  two  Rajput  men  have  taken 
low-caste  wives  from  outside  the  village — one  of  barber  caste  and  one 
of  a  charcoal-making  group.  Both  unions  were  terminated  under  pub- 
lic pressure  when  the  facts  became  known.  One  Rajput  man  related  to 
a  Sirkanda  family  but  resident  in  a  neighboring  village  took  three 
low-caste  wives,  a  weaver,  a  carpenter,  and  a  blacksmith,  and  lived  with 
all  three  at  once.  In  the  case  of  the  last  of  these  the  couple  underwent  a 
ceremony  at  the  insistence  of  the  girl's  parents,  for  she  had  not  been 
previously  married.  A  Brahmin  was  found  to  perform  it,  but  no  one 
other  than  the  girl's  relatives  attended.  The  man  remained  with  these 
three  wives  throughout  his  life  but  was  ostracized  by  his  own  caste. 
His  one  son  is  of  the  caste  of  his  mother  but  has  inherited  the  property 
of  his  father.  A  life-long  Rajput-weaver  union  existed  in  a  nearby 
village,  and  in  another  village  a  Rajput  had  three  blacksmith  wives. 
Both  the  blacksmiths  and  Bajgis  of  Sirkanda  trace  their  ancestry  to 
high-caste  male  ancestors,  a  Rajput  and  a  Brahmin,  respectively,  who 
married  women  of  low  caste  with  the  result  that  their  children  were 
assigned  to  the  same  caste  as  their  mothers.  Whether  this  ancestry  is 
fact  or  fancy,  it  is  believed  and  indicates  the  possibility  of  such  unions 
and  their  results. 

An  extreme  case  of  intercaste  marriage  in  Bhatbair  involved  the 
elopement  of  a  boy  of  shoemaker  caste  and  a  Brahmin  girl — the  lowest 
and  highest  castes  and  the  reverse  of  the  expected  sex-caste  affiliation. 
This  was  a  universally  disapproved  case.  When  such  a  union  is  hypothe- 
sized to  villagers  in  a  question,  the  questioner  is  promptly  assured  that 
the  result  would  be  death  to  the  man  or  perhaps  to  both  partners,  and 
lifelong  ostracism  should  either  survive.  In  reality,  the  couple  ran  off 
to  Dehra  Dun,  where  they  lived  together  for  some  time.  There  fellow 


156  KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP 

shoemakers  finally  put  pressure  on  the  boy  to  return  the  girl  to  her 
people,  and  he  too  went  home.  Now  both  live  in  their  respective  vil- 
lages, unmarriageable  but  otherwise  unimpeded  in  carrying  on  their 
normal  lives.  Rumor  has  it  that  they  are  still  in  love  and  perhaps  in 
surreptitious  contact  and  that  they  have  no  desire  to  remarry  even  were 
this  allowed. 

Among  the  low  castes,  blacksmiths  and  carpenters  form  a  single 
endogamous  group  while  weavers  and  the  immigrant  Sirkanda  bar- 
bers are  separated  from  them  and  from  one  another  by  little  social  or 
ritual  distance.  These  groups  intermarry  frequently  and  without  public 
disapproval  (see  discussion  of  "Relations  Among  Low  Castes"  in 
chap.  7). 

Bajgis  and  shoemakers  stay  within  their  respective  castes  more  con- 
sistently as  they  are  more  distant  from  one  another  and  from  the  above 
group  than  are  the  castes  within  the  above  group.  Exceptions  cutting 
across  these  lines  probably  occur  with  about  the  same  frequency  and 
results  as  the  above-listed  high-caste  deviations.  No  examples  of  ex- 
ceptions were  found  in  Bhatbair,  where  only  a  small  sample  of  low- 
caste  marriages  could  be  obtained  because  of  their  small  numbers. 

Married  women  of  any  caste  may  be  "sold"  to  outsiders,  as  described 
in  the  section  on  "Illegal  Economic  Activities"  in  chapter  2.  In  such 
cases  caste  is  not  a  significant  consideration.  There  are  Sirkanda  women 
who  have  been  married  in  this  way  to  plains  merchants  (Banias),  Nepa- 
lese  Rajput  military  officers,  and  a  Sikh  religious  leader.  There  is  no 
caste  in  Bhatbair  whose  women  have  not  on  occasion  been  involved  in 
such  transactions,  though  all,  and  especially  the  high  castes,  are  careful 
to  conceal  the  fact.  In  terms  of  frequency,  more  low-caste  women  have 
been  sold.  Usually  the  woman's  family  and  her  husband  lack  prior 
knowledge  and  do  not  consent,  although  one  Rajput  husband  appar- 
ently connived  in  such  a  transaction  in  order  to  make  way  for  a  new 
wife  for  himself.  Among  the  low  castes  an  unmarried  girl  is  occasionally 
"sold"  by  her  parents  to  outsiders  in  this  fashion.  Two  such  instances 
were  recorded  as  initial  marriages  in  Sirkanda.  These  were  two  of  32 
recorded  marriages  of  low-caste  village  girls,  so  the  practice  is  not 
especially  rare. 

One  current  case  of  cross-caste  marriage  exists  in  Sirkanda  and  three 
others  have  been  reported  in  recent  years,  constituting  a  total  of  about 
1  per  cent  of  all  unions.  Marriage  of  women  to  non-Paharis  would  not 
raise  this  above  2  per  cent  at  the  maximum.  Of  the  local  intercaste 
unions  only  Rajput-Brahmin  and  some  inter-low-caste  marriages  sur- 
vived public  disapproval.  In  all  reported  cases  marriages  which  crossed 
the  boundary  between  high  and  low  castes  resulted  either  in  ostracism 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  157 

of  the  high-caste  partner  by  his  caste-fellows  or  dissolution  of  the  mar- 
riage under  public  pressure.  No  union  would  be  allowed  to  persist  be- 
tween a  high-caste  woman  and  a  low-caste  man,  and  none  would  be 
openly  attempted  in  the  area.  There  is  an  explicit  tradition  that,  while 
intercaste  marriage  is  not  permissible,  if  it  does  in  fact  occur  and  if  it 
is  repeated  for  seven  generations,  a  new  caste  is  formed  and  recognized. 
No  example  of  this  was  known,  and  the  mechanics  of  its  operation  were 
hazy  in  the  minds  of  villagers.  Normally  the  children  of  an  intercaste 
union  belong  to  the  caste  of  the  lower-caste  parent,  usually  the  mother. 

Before  closing  this  discussion  of  rules  of  endogamy  it  may  be  rele- 
vant to  mention  that  the  most  popular  Pahari  song  in  Sirkanda  during 
1957-1958  glorified  an  intercaste  elopement  and  widow  remarriage. 
This  song,  sung  primarily  by  young  people  as  they  worked  in  the  jungle, 
had  several  versions.  In  essence,  it  was  the  story  of  a  young  widow  of 
weaver  caste  who  was  directed  by  her  own  and  her  husband's  family 
to  remain  in  the  family  of  her  deceased  husband.  Unable  to  face  the 
prospect  of  such  a  lonely  life,  she  eloped  to  the  plains  with  a  Brahmin 
man.  Tracked  down  by  her  relatives,  the  couple  were  taken  to  court, 
where  the  magistrate  ruled  in  favor  of  the  couple,  saying  that  it  was 
their  right  to  do  as  they  felt  best.  He  fined  the  relatives  for  causing 
such  inconvenience  to  all  concerned.  The  couple  went  off  to  live  hap- 
pily ever  after,  but  not  before  the  woman's  relatives  had  secured  a 
measure  of  revenge  by  branding  her  on  the  forehead  with  a  red-hot 
coin.  The  song  is  allegedly  based  on  a  true  story  of  recent  origin  in  a 
neighboring  area  of  Tehri  Garhwal.  It  was  popular  with  all  castes,  and 
the  heroine  was  known  affectionately  to  all  by  her  pet  name. 

Thus,  marriage  across  caste  lines  is  not  abhorred  in  this  society  to  the 
extent  that  it  is  in  many  areas  of  India.  Rules  of  endogamy  are  not 
rigidly  adhered  to,  but  they  are  not  violated  as  frequently  as  the  Pahari 
reputation  would  lead  one  to  expect.4  Intercaste  marriage  is  tolerated 
if  it  is  not  the  initial  marriage  and  if  the  castes  of  the  individuals  in- 
volved are  of  the  same  general  economic  and  social  level.  As  will  be- 
come evident  in  later  discussion,  this  is  one  aspect  of  a  generally  looser 
definition  of  appropriate  caste  behavior  in  the  hills  as  compared  to  the 
plains. 

Exogamy 

Besides  caste  endogamy,  marriages  are  also  regulated  by  sib  exog- 
amy. In  this  region  no  person  is  allowed  to  marry  within  his  own  sib 
or  that  of  his  mother.  To  do  so  would  be  to  commit  incest,  since  it 
would  be  to  marry  classificatory  siblings  or  other  relatives.  All  of  the 
mother's  sib  is  included  within  the  kindred  (discussed  below).  Children 


158  KIN    GROUPS    AND   KINSHIP 

of  mother's  siblings  (real  and  classificatory)  are  classified  as  siblings  of 
ego,  even  though  they  are  of  different  sib  affiliation,  just  as  are  children 
of  father's  siblings.  In  addition,  among  the  high  castes  the  sibs  of  di- 
rect female  ancestors  are  supposed  to  be  excluded  from  eligibility  for 
marriage  for  five  to  ten  generations  back,  as  reported  variously  by 
Brahmin  informants,  who  are  the  ultimate  authorities  on  such  matters. 
This  is  evidently  an  expression  of  the  Hindu  sapinda  rule  of  exogamy 
prohibiting  marriage  within  the  bilaterally  defined  kindred: 

The  marriage  rules  as  regards  Sapinda  relationship  or  consanguinity  de- 
fine that  a  man  should  not  marry  a  girl  who  is  related  to  him  through  a  com- 
mon male  ancestor  up  to  the  7th  generation  in  the  father's  line  and  up  to 
the  5th  generation  in  the  mother's  line.  Different  law  books  give  different 
rules.  (Karve,  1953,  p.  55) 

Unfortunately  in  Sirkanda  sib  affiliation  of  village  wives  proved  to 
be  a  difficult  and  unreliable  type  of  data  to  obtain  for  generations 
preceding  the  present,  although  marriage  does  not  alter  a  woman's 
sib  affiliation.  However,  the  village  contains  two  large  and  two  smaller 
Rajput  sibs.  The  data  on  these  are  good  and  throw  light  on  the  matter 
of  inter-sib  marriage  arrangements,  since  these  sibs  can  and  do  inter- 
marry frequently  in  the  village.  Fifty-three  Rajput  marriages  between 
people  of  the  sibs  found  in  Sirkanda  were  recorded,  and  they  revealed 
no  cases  of  marriage  within  own  or  mother's  sib  on  first  or  subsequent 
marriages.5  Four  cases  of  marriage  into  paternal  grandmother's  sib 
occurred.  One  of  these  four  was  a  first  marriage,  and  two  comprised  an 
instance  of  sororal  polygyny.  This  indicates  that  the  effective  exoga- 
mous  units  are  own  and  mother's  sib  only,  and  accords  with  information 
given  by  Joshi  (1929,  p.  75)  and  with  the  testimony  of  uneducated 
Rajput  informants,  who  mentioned  only  these  as  prohibited  groups. 

A  single  instance  of  intra-sib  marriage  was  reported.  The  wife  of  a 
Sirkanda  Rajput  left  him  shortly  after  marriage  to  live  as  wife  of  a 
man  in  another  village  who  stood  in  the  relationship  of  father's  brother's 
son's  son  to  her  and  was  therefore  her  sib-fellow  and  nephew.  Since  this 
was  a  second  marriage,  objection  was  mild  and  the  union  has  endured. 
Probably  the  fact  that  the  relationship  was  not  particularly  close  and 
that  the  woman  was  not  older  than  the  man  added  to  its  acceptability. 
No  other  instances  of  marriages  within  incest  boundaries  appeared. 
Perhaps  this  is  partly  because  when  they  occur  among  the  most  distant 
prohibited  relationships  they  are  not  as  conspicuous  as  the  more  fre- 
quently reported  intercaste  marriages.  However,  these  data  and  the 
expressed  attitudes  of  villagers  suggest  that  rules  of  exogamy  are  less 
frequently  broken  than  rules  of  endogamy  in  this  society. 


KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP  159 

Marriage  Networks 

There  is  no  rule  of  village  exogamy  in  this  area  such  as  is  reported 
for  other  parts  of  North  India,  including  nearby  Jaunsar-Bawar 
(Saksena,  1955,  p.  28;  Berreman,  ig62d).  Neither  is  there  any  reluctance 
to  give  and  take  brides  in  the  same  village  as  is  true,  for  example, 
among  the  Noniyas  of  Senapur  (Rowe,  1960b).  As  will  be  mentioned 
again,  high-caste  sibs  in  Sirkanda  may  derive  from  formerly  exogamous 
community  affiliation,  but  this  does  not  affect  the  present  situation  in 
and  around  Sirkanda.  In  this  region,  if  a  man  and  woman  of  the  same 
caste  are  not  within  one  another's  kindred,  if  they  are  of  different  sibs 
and  their  mothers  are  of  different  sibs,  they  are  potential  mates  re- 
gardless of  village  membership.  Local  exogamy  often  results  from  the 
fact  that  these  conditions  cannot  be  met  within  the  village,  but  this  is 
local  exogamy  in  effect,  not  in  intent.  Local  exogamy  occurs  in  all 
castes  of  Sirkanda  except  Rajputs,  because  all  but  they  are  single-sib 
local  segments  of  castes.  Some  Bhatbair  villages  are  entirely  single-sib 
villages,  and  hence  their  members  must  marry  outside  the  village. 

Of  471  recorded  marriages  contracted  by  Sirkanda  people,  377  were 
Rajput  marriages,  and  of  these  77,  or  20  per  cent,  were  contracted 
within  the  village.6  The  remaining  394  Sirkanda  marriages  were  con- 
tracted with  people  of  92  identified  villages  and  four  general  areas  at 
greater  distances — roughly  400  marriages  in  100  localities  (see  map  2). 
The  numbers  ranged  from  45  marriages  in  one  village  (Kanda)  to  one 
each  in  36  villages.  Thirty  per  cent  of  these  marriages  were  contracted 
in  seven  villages,  and  80  per  cent  were  contracted  in  50  villages  (in- 
cluding the  seven  just  mentioned  but  excluding  Sirkanda),  all  within 
a  four  air-mile  radius  of  the  village,  that  is,  eight  trail  miles,  an  easy 
half-day's  trip.  This  leaves  20  per  cent  of  the  nonviilage  marriages 
spread  over  42  villages  and  four  broader  areas  up  to  18  air  miles  dis- 
tant (about  35  trail  miles,  a  two-day  trip  each  way).  Thus,  of  all  Sir- 
kanda marriages,  83  per  cent  are  within  a  radius  of  four  air  miles.  Six- 
teen per  cent  (all  Rajput  marriages)  are  within  Sirkanda  itself.7  A 
villager  remarked,  "On  the  plains  it  is  easy  to  travel,  and  people  there 
go  great  distances  for  brides.  Here  it  is  very  difficult  to  get  around  so 
we  have  to  find  ours  closer  to  our  own  village.  It  is  as  hard  to  go  one 
mile  here  as  it  is  to  go  five  miles  in  the  plains  on  foot,  and  many  places 
there  they  can  go  by  motor  bus  or  at  least  by  cart." 

Virtually  all  Sirkanda  marriages  are  contracted  in  Pahari  villages, 
although  non-Pahari  villages  are  well-known  and  easily  accessible 
within  five  air  miles  of  the  village,  in  the  valley  en  route  to  Dehra  Dun. 
Marriages  at  distances  this  great  or  greater  comprise  17  per  cent  of  all 


l6o  KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP 

village  unions,  but  they  are  all  in  Tehri  Garhwal,  which  is  culturally 
more  similar,  though  physically  less  accessible,  than  the  valley.  The 
only  exceptions  in  Sirkanda  have  been  six  barber-caste  marriages  and 
the  sale  of  two  low-caste  women  to  outsiders.8 

Caste  differences  in  distribution  of  spouses'  villages  revealed  differ- 
ential extent  in  marriage  networks  (cf.  Rowe,  1960b)  in  the  various 
castes.  Eighty-five  per  cent  of  high-caste  marriages  occurred  within  the 
four-mile  radius,  and  73  per  cent  of  Bajgi,  53  per  cent  of  blacksmith, 
and  35  per  cent  of  barber  marriages  were  that  close.  This  is  a  direct 
reflection  of  the  relative  population  of  these  groups  and  of  the  outside 
origin  of  the  barbers.  The  fewer  the  potential  mates  for  a  group  in  the 
area,  the  farther  they  have  to  go  to  find  mates.  The  overwhelming  ma- 
jority of  Bhatbair  residents  are  Rajputs  and  Brahmins.  Likewise,  in- 
dividual villages  reflect  their  caste  and  sib  composition  in  the  fre- 
quency of  intermarriage  with  Sirkanda  villagers.  One  village  provided 
45  mates,  all  Rajputs,  while  another  provided  14  mates,  12  of  low 
castes,  and  two  Brahmins.  There  were  no  discernible  patterned  differ- 
ences between  distribution  of  bride-giving  and  bride-taking  villages; 
that  is,  giving  and  taking  of  brides  appeared  to  occur  randomly  among 
villages  in  the  marriage  networks  of  each  caste,  except  where  sib  ex- 
ogamy prevented  it. 

The  marriage  network  of  each  caste  roughly  defines  the  limits  of  its 
informal  social  interaction  outside  the  village.  Most  visiting  is  done 
with  relatives,  and  most  relatives  outside  the  village  are  affines.  How- 
ever, the  village  community  remains  the  social  unit  of  most  frequent 
and  important  interaction.  It  is  not  surpassed,  even  among  low  castes 
(as  is  the  case  among  Senapur  Noniyas)  by  the  intervillage  marriage 
network.  Low-caste  people  of  Sirkanda  have  not  experienced  the  new- 
found freedom  of  the  Noniyas  and,  even  if  they  had,  demography  and 
topography  might  have  precluded  development  of  transcendent  social 
and  political  functions  characteristic  of  the  marriage  network  of  Sen- 
apur (cf.  Rowe,  1960b,  p.  310).  Sirkanda  villagers  are  still  closely  tied 
to  the  multi-caste  village  dominated  by  the  local  Rajputs. 

New  Wives  for  Old 

Divorce  and  remarriage  are  frequent  among  the  people  of  Sir- 
kanda, although  perhaps  not  so  common  as  in  Jaunsar-Bawar,  where 
Majumdar  (1944,  p.  162)  reports  that  barrenness  results  in  divorce  and 
Saksena  (1955,  p.  36)  reports  that  the  "slightest  disloyalty  or  the  slight- 
est slip"  on  the  part  of  a  wife  may  result  in  divorce.9 

A  couple  who  do  not  get  along  well  together  or  who  have  specific 
grievances  either  on  their  own  part  or  that  of  their  families — for  ex- 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  l6l 

ample,  the  wife  refusing  to  stay  with  her  husband,  or  the  husband's 
family  refusing  to  make  good  the  bride  price — may  go  through  a  pro- 
cedure called  chUt,  divorce,  which  breaks  the  marriage  bond.  Either 
party  may  initiate  this  action.  In  such  cases  an  ad  hoc  panchayat,  or 
council,  of  friends  of  both  parties  acts  as  intermediary  to  achieve  a  sat- 
isfactory settlement.  A  written  agreement  is  signed  by  the  father  of 
the  wife  and  by  the  husband  or  his  father.  The  agreement  specifies  the 
amount  to  be  paid  by  the  family  of  the  wife  and  states  that  thereafter 
the  parties  are  to  be  free  of  mutual  obligation.  In  addition,  a  sum  is 
paid  to  the  panchayat.  If  the  girl  plans  to  live  with  someone  else,  that 
man  may  pay  the  former  husband's  family  either  directly  or  indirectly. 
One  such  formal  dissolution  occurred  in  a  Rajput  family  in  the  year 

1957~1958. 

A  much  more  common  type  of  divorce,  and  virtually  the  only  type 
among  low  castes,  occurs  when  a  wife  goes  to  her  parents'  home  or  to 
another  man  and  refuses  to  return,  or  a  husband  sends  her  home.  In 
the  former  case  the  husband  will  try  to  exact  reimbursement  but  may 
not  be  successful,  especially  if  the  wife  runs  some  distance  away.  Vil- 
lage or  caste  panchayats  may  intervene  to  secure  a  just  settlement  in 
such  cases.  In  any  elopement  the  panchayat  is  called  by  the  family  with 
which  the  girl  was  affiliated  at  the  time  of  elopement  (usually  the  hus- 
band's family,  but  sometimes  parents),  as  they  are  the  aggrieved  party. 

Threats  of  running  away  or  unannounced  short-term  retreats  to  the 
home  village  are  used  by  women  to  secure  better  treatment  from  their 
husbands.  Husbands  may  deprive  errant  wives  of  things  they  want 
(trinkets,  new  clothes,  attendance  at  a  fair)  or  physically  punish  them. 
No  accurate  data  were  obtained  on  frequency  with  which  the  husband, 
as  compared  to  the  wife,  instigated  divorce,  but  it  appears  to  be  about 
equal.  Although  precise  data  are  lacking,  it  seems  likely  that  at  least 
20  per  cent  of  all  marriages  are  dissolved  by  formal  or  informal  divorce. 
This  estimate  is  based  primarily  on  figures  for  high  castes.  Unlike  the 
plains  situation,  where  low-caste  divorce  is  frequent  but  high-caste 
divorce  is  infrequent  or  concealed,  there  are  no  apparent  differences 
in  divorce  rates  among  the  various  hill  castes.  Divorce  is  taken  as  a 
matter  of  course. 

Causes  of  divorce  are  many  and  complex.  Failure  to  fulfill  the  formal 
and  informal  obligations  of  marriage  are  overt  reasons  given  for  di- 
vorce. Among  reasons  given  in  specific  instances  were:  nonpayment  of 
bride  price,  nonvirginity  of  allegedly  virginal  bride,  mental  or  physi- 
cal defect  in  one  partner,  bride's  failure  to  perform  her  duties  in  the 
house,  bride's  inability  to  get  along  with  in-laws,  bride's  refusal  to  stay 
in  the  household  or  refusal  to  return  after  postmarriage  visit  to  her 


162  KIN    GROUPS   AND    KINSHIP 

home,  husband's  mistreatment  of  wife,  husband's  failure  to  provide 
adequately  for  wife,  husband's  departure  from  village  leaving  wife 
stranded  there,  father-in-law's  molestation  of  bride,  and  persistent 
adultery  or  philandering  on  part  of  wife  or  husband.  Occasional  adul- 
tery is  not  normally  a  ground  for  divorce  and  is,  in  fact,  expected.  How- 
ever, when  it  is  practiced  openly,  when  lasting  attachments  are  made, 
when  a  person  acquires  a  reputation  for  excessive  indulgence — es- 
pecially if  it  involves  cross-caste  relations — or  when  a  person  neglects 
his  or  her  spouse  in  favor  of  a  lover,  divorce  is  likely  to  follow.  If  either 
partner  falls  in  love  with  someone  else,  he  or  she  is  likely  to  leave  or 
purposely  bring  about  divorce.  In  at  least  one  case  in  Sirkanda  a  wife 
left  when  her  husband  took  a  second  wife,  although  his  intent  had 
been  to  establish  a  polygynous  relationship.  A  Brahmin  man  in  a  nearby 
village  lost  his  first  wife,  a  Brahmin,  when  he  brought  in  a  Rajput 
woman  as  second  wife.  Remarriage  after  divorce  is  almost  universal. 
Some  men  and  women  have  had  a  succession  of  marriages.  One  Sirkanda 
man  voluntarily  parted  with  three  successive  wives.  One  nineteen-year- 
old  girl  is  living  with  her  third  successive  husband,  a  young  Sirkanda 
man.  On  the  other  hand,  one  village  daughter  in  Sirkanda  has  returned 
home  after  a  particularly  unhappy  marriage,  resolved  to  live  out  her 
life  in  the  large  extended  family  of  her  parents  and  brothers  and  never 
to  remarry. 

Remarriage  after  a  spouse's  death  is  expected.  High-caste  plains 
customs  in  this  regard  are  known  but  not  envied.  This  is  one  instance 
in  which  orthodox,  Sanskritic  custom  is  not  emulated.  Even  educated 
Pahari  Brahmins  do  not  press  for  it,  saying  that  in  these  hills  it  is  im- 
practical to  keep  dependent  widows  unmarried.  There  is  no  reluctance 
to  discuss  the  subject  and  no  inferiority  feeling  about  it,  as  there  is 
about  some  non-Sanskritic  practices.  One  Rajput  man  said, 

Forbidding  widow  remarriage  is  a  stupid  custom.  What  is  a  widow  to  do 
with  herself  if  she  does  not  remarry?  She  is  a  burden  to  her  family  and  to 
herself.  Anyway,  it  would  not  work  here.  Every  man  needs  a  woman  and 
every  woman  needs  a  man.  If  our  widows  didn't  remarry  we  would  have  de- 
pendent widows  and  unmarried  men  who  couldn't  do  all  of  their  work  in 
the  village.  It  is  taken  care  of  easily  because  the  woman  often  goes  to  her 
husband's  brother. 

If  a  widow  remarries  outside  her  husband's  family,  she  usually  gives 
up  her  rights  to  her  husband's  property,  though  her  children  by  him 
will  receive  it  when  they  reach  maturity,  even  if  she  keeps  them  with 
her.  Occasionally  a  widow  remains  in  her  husband's  house  and  re- 
mains a  clan  member,  even  though  she  does  not  become  the  wife  of 


KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP  163 

one  of  his  brothers.  Rarely  such  a  woman  will  take  a  husband  from 
outside  the  family  and  yet  remain  in  the  house.  As  in  the  unusual  case 
of  a  matrilocal  initial  marriage,  this  occurs  only  if  there  are  no  eligible 
men  in  the  family  and  most  often  when  there  are  no  other  adults  in 
the  family  at  all.  The  new  husband  then  becomes  a  member  of  the 
clan  of  his  new  wife  and  her  former  husband.  He  is  derisively  said  to 
have  "gone  to  sit"  at  the  woman's  house,  and  he  is  likely  to  be  ridiculed 
if  he  is  an  outsider  in  the  village.  The  arrangement  is  advantageous 
if  the  woman  has  property  from  her  first  husband  which  she  can  in  this 
way  retain  and  still  be  remarried.  One  such  case  had  occurred  in  a 
Sirkanda  chan  in  recent  years. 

Adoption 

Having  children,  and  especially  sons,  is  very  important  in  Sir- 
kanda families,  as  it  is  throughout  Hindu  India.  The  son  not  only 
helps  with  the  work  and  carries  on  the  family  line  but  inherits  the 
father's  property  and  performs  the  necessary  rites  associated  with  the 
death  and  postdeath  welfare  of  his  parents.  If  no  son  is  born  to  a  man 
he  often  designates  his  son-in-law  to  fulfill  these  roles.  The  son-in-law 
must  then  come  to  live  in  the  father's  house,  and  he  manages  the  lands 
of  his  deceased  father-in-law,  ultimately  passing  them  on  to  his  sons 
by  this  wife,  or  to  an  adopted  son.  If  he  has  no  sons,  the  land  does  not 
revert  to  others  in  his  lineage,  but  stays  in  the  lineage  of  his  wife. 

If  a  man  has  no  son  or  daughter,  he  may  designate  some  other  rela- 
tive to  be  his  heir  and  to  perform  the  death  rites.  More  often,  however, 
he  will  adopt  a  son.  Girls  are  not  adopted.  There  are  currently  four 
cases  of  adoption  in  Sirkanda.  An  adopted  son  is  usually  a  relative  who 
stands  to  gain  more  in  the  way  of  property  by  the  adoption  than  if  he 
stayed  with  his  real  parents.  Often  he  is  a  daughter's  son.  He  may  be  a 
boy  born  under  an  inauspicious  asterism,  an  orphan  or  semi-orphan, 
or  one  of  many  brothers  in  a  poor  family.  Like  marriage,  adoption 
does  not  alter  sib  affiliation,  but  it  does  alter  clan  identification.  Adop- 
tion is  frequently  resented  by  relatives  of  the  adopter,  who  would  in- 
herit his  property  were  it  not  for  the  adopted  heir.  Sometimes  a  family 
offers  a  son  for  adoption,  especially  when  he  is  near  adulthood  already, 
for  purely  mercenary  reasons:  they  hope  to  get  additional  property  into 
the  family. 

Adoption  is  publicly  recognized  but  is  informally  effected  without 
ceremony.  The  adopted  child  simply  comes  to  live  with  the  adopting 
family,  and  it  is  announced  that  this  boy  will  inherit  the  property  of 
his  new  father.  From  that  time  on  the  boy  is  treated  as  a  son  by  his 


164  KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP 

new  parents.  "An  adopted  son  is  just  like  a  real  son  to  his  father.  He 
serves  and  honors  his  father  even  more  than  a  real  son  would.  Since  a 
foster  father  has  no  other  sons,  he  showers  more  affection  on  the  adopted 
boy  than  he  would  if  he  had  several  of  his  own.  He  won't  adopt  a  boy 
he  doesn't  like."  If  adoption  occurs  in  childhood,  the  boy  grows  up  in 
the  family  as  a  son.  If,  as  is  often  the  case,  adoption  occurs  later  in  life 
— after  the  foster  parents  have  given  up  all  hope  of  offspring  of  their 
own — the  boy  moves  into  the  household  of  his  new  parents  even  if  he 
is  already  married.  He  begins  to  share  in  that  economic  unit  and  ceases 
to  share  in  that  of  his  real  father.  The  parents  by  adoption  will  make 
wedding  arrangements  and  payments  if  the  boy  is  unmarried  or  takes 
a  second  wife.  In  such  cases  the  boy  may  be  entitled  to  claim  inheritance 
from  his  real  parents  as  well  as  the  foster  ones.  Adoption  is  generally 
arranged  with  an  advance  understanding  on  this  matter,  and  usually 
the  boy  surrenders  his  claim  to  his  real  parents'  property. 

Sometimes  an  orphaned  or  otherwise  disadvantaged  child,  usually  a 
relative,  is  taken  into  a  family  where  there  are  already  several  children. 
There  is  less  interest  in  such  a  child,  probably  because  he  is  thrust 
upon  the  family  and  will  perform  no  important  function  for  it,  and 
often  he  is  exploited  and  deprived  in  comparison  to  the  real  offspring 
of  the  family.  Two  current  instances  of  this  type  were  found  among 
Sirkanda  families. 


Child  Rearing 

An  important  function  of  the  family  is,  of  course,  child  rearing. 
Children  are  usually  carefully  cared  for.  If  there  are  already  four  or 
more  in  the  family,  a  child  may  tend  to  suffer  from  neglect.  Infant 
mortality  rates  are  high,  but  accurate  data  are  unavailable.  Three 
children  two  years  of  age  or  under  died  out  of  31  in  the  village  during 
1957-1958.  One  of  five  born  during  the  year  died  shortly  after  birth. 
Two  families  reported  twice  as  many  births  as  living  children;  some 
others  had  had  few  or  no  infant  deaths.  Probably  infant  and  child 
mortality  runs  over  20  per  cent. 

Children  are  not  given  solid  foods  until  a  year  after  birth.  They 
continue  to  nurse  until  another  child  is  born,  and  sporadically  there- 
after. Occasionally  a  youngest  child  may  be  allowed  to  suck  for  six 
years  or  longer. 

The  atmosphere  of  child  rearing  is  indulgent  and  permissive.  The 
child  is  allowed  to  handle  anything  within  reach,  and  its  parents  or 
relatives  and  friends  are  usually  around  the  house,  sitting  on  the  floor 
where  the  child  can  crawl  over  them  as  it  pleases  and  where  they  can 


KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP  165 

show  it  whatever  attention  it  demands.  Almost  anything  a  small  child 
does  is  accepted.  No  special  effort  is  made  to  encourage  the  child  to 
walk.  Toilet  training  is  gradual  and  not  intensive;  the  mother  or  a 
sibling  simply  begins  taking  the  child  out  of  the  living  area  of  the 
house  when  defecation  or  urination  seems  imminent,  and  accidents  are 
tolerated  without  comment  for  at  least  three  years.  The  small  child, 
until  it  can  walk  competently,  spends  most  of  the  time  in  the  house  or 
on  the  hip  of  an  elder  sibling.  Since  dwelling  rooms  are  on  the  second 
story,  doorways  and  verandas  are  barricaded  with  boards  to  protect  the 
infant  from  falling.  Often  the  child  is  tied  around  the  waist  with  a 
leash  attached  to  a  bedpost.  In  most  extended  families  someone,  often 
an  elderly  person,  is  always  around  to  look  after  the  child,  and  this  is 
cited  as  an  advantage  of  the  extended  family  system.  In  families  where 
there  is  no  extra  person  about  to  watch  the  child,  it  may  simply  be 
locked  in  the  house  when  the  parents  have  to  be  away  to  work  in  the 
fields  or  forest.  One  infant  was  burned  to  death  in  1957  when  it  rolled 
into  the  fireplace  after  having  been  left  alone  while  its  parents  were 
working  in  the  fields.  As  children  grow  old  enough  to  get  about  easily 
and  to  take  care  of  themselves,  they  are  free  to  roam  the  village  with 
siblings  or  other  children,  though  they  are  encouraged  to  stay  near  the 
house  when  unaccompanied. 

About  half  the  boys  resident  in  the  village  and  an  occasional  girl 
attend  the  local  school  with  varying  degrees  of  regularity  from  age  6 
to  1 1  or  12.  The  children  who  attend  are  those  whose  parents  want  them 
to,  and  this  is  largely  a  matter  of  whether  they  are  needed  to  help  with 
the  household  work.  By  age  8  to  12  boys  begin  to  accompany  their 
fathers  in  their  work,  while  girls  continue  to  help  their  mothers.  By 
age  14  a  girl  is  ready  to  live  with  her  husband,  whom  she  has  married 
1  to  3  years  earlier.  Ideally  she  should  have  her  first  menstruation  in 
her  husband's  household,  but  some  marry  considerably  later.  A  boy  is 
ready  to  take  a  wife  by  16  or  17,  though  some  do  not  do  so  until  later. 

Throughout  childhood  the  child  is  rarely  disciplined.  He  is  repri- 
manded, commanded,  and  threatened,  but  these  words  are  not  often 
enforced  by  physical  means,  and  the  child  soon  learns  this.  Lackadaisi- 
cal compliance  is  the  typical  reaction  to  adult  direction.  The  child  is 
generally  in  the  company  of  other  children  but  is  rarely  excluded  from 
adult  company.  There  is  little  a  child  cannot  see  and  attempt  to  imi- 
tate, although  sex  activity  is  (not  very  successfully)  concealed  from 
children.  Caste  consciousness  and  discrimination  are  learned  from 
childhood  through  instructions  received,  references  overheard,  and 
behavior  observed.  However,  caste  barriers  do  not  enter  into  children's 
interaction  among  themselves  until  after  puberty.  One  case  of  mutual 


l66  KIN    GROUPS   AND    KINSHIP 

"puppy  love"  during  my  stay  in  the  village  was  between  a  15-year-old 
blacksmith  boy  and  the  14-year-old  daughter  of  the  village  headman,  a 
Rajput  and  the  wealthiest  man  in  the  village.  During  this  period  the 
girl  became  engaged  to  her  future  husband,  but  this  did  not  dismay  her 
nor  her  friend.  Their  relationship  was  concealed  from  adults  but  not 
for  reasons  of  caste. 


Intrafamily  Relations 

Patterns  of  interaction  among  members  of  the  patrilocal  extended 
family  depend  in  large  part  upon  interplay  of  age,  sex,  and  relationship 
roles.  Males  take  precedence  over  females,  age  over  youth,  consanguin- 
eal  over  affinal  relationship. 

As  has  been  stated,  the  eldest  active  male  is  the  household  head.  This 
man  is  in  the  relationship  of  father  or  elder  brother  to  other  adult  males 
in  the  family.  He  is  responsible  for  all  decisions  in  the  family,  and  his 
is  the  final  authority,  whether  it  be  in  matters  of  allocating  lands  to 
crops,  performing  worship,  or  arranging  a  marriage.  The  father  is  not 
always  the  authoritarian  family  head  as  ideally  described.  He  may 
hesitate  to  rebuke  an  adult  son.  The  father  of  one  young  Sirkanda  man 
was  disturbed  at  his  son's  continual  absence  from  home  in  pursuit  of 
an  illicit  love  affair  in  another  village.  He  was  not  doing  his  share  of  the 
family  work  (they  were  Bajgis).  But  the  father  had  not  the  courage  to 
face  the  boy  on  the  matter.  Finally  he  went  to  the  husband  of  his  son's 
lover  and  complained  to  him  that  his  wife  was  ruining  the  boy  and 
taking  his  money,  and  that  the  affair  must  stop.  The  husband,  who  had 
known  of  the  affair  but  had  not  interfered  (probably  because  his  wife 
was  getting  material  rewards  for  her  service),  then  spoke  to  the  young 
man  and  told  him  to  leave  the  woman  alone.  It  worked,  for  a  time 
at  least,  with  a  minimum  of  hard  feeling  and  no  intrafamily  tension 
in  the  Sirkanda  family. 

In  most  instances  the  family  head  acts  on  family  matters  after  con- 
sulting with  other  males  and  often  his  wife  as  well,  but  this  is  not 
necessary  nor  prescribed.  When  an  old  man  becomes  senile  or  inactive 
or  when  he  dies,  he  is  replaced  by  the  next  in  line.  If  conflict  occurs 
over  succession,  the  joint  family  is  likely  to  divide.  An  old  and  inactive 
man  tends  to  be  ignored  or  actively  resented  by  other  family  members 
and  he  himself  often  resents  their  attitudes  toward  him,  so  that  every- 
one looks  forward  to  his  death.  Old  men,  like  old  women,  find  occupa- 
tion around  the  house  in  caring  for  children  or  doing  domestic  tasks. 
After  the  death  of  the  household  head  his  widow  may  be  referred  to  as 


m 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  167 

the  head,  but  in  reality  the  authority  usually  passes  to  the  next  eldest 
male  if  he  is  an  adult. 

Among  brothers  in  a  family,  age  takes  precedence.  Younger  brothers 
are  expected  to  obey  and  respect  their  elders.  This  rule  applies  to  par- 
allel cousins  (father's  brother's  sons)  as  well  as  to  real  brothers.  Sisters 
are  expected  to  respect  and  obey  brothers  regardless  of  relative  age, 
though  of  course  they  often  care  for  and  wield  authority  over  much 
younger  brothers  in  childhood.  Among  sisters,  age  takes  precedence. 
The  mother  has  the  honor  and  respect  of  sons  and  daughters.  She  re- 
tains authority  over  daughters  till  they  marry,  and  loses  authority  over 
sons  as  they  reach  maturity. 

Before  proceeding  further  it  will  be  well  to  emphasize  that  Pahari 
women  of  all  castes  enjoy  a  degree  of  freedom  unknown  among  any 
but  the  low-caste  women  of  the  plains.  They  work  alone  or  in  groups 
without  male  accompaniment.  They  come  and  go  as  they  please  around 
the  village  and  talk  to  whomever  they  please  except  strangers.  They  are 
not  restricted  to  separate  living  quarters,  and  they  are  not  subject  to 
purdah  (seclusion).  Therefore  in  the  ensuing  discussion,  their  sub- 
ordination to  men  must  be  recognized  as  subordination  within  a  con- 
text of  relative  freedom.  It  is  not  the  same  order  of  subordination 
found  among  many  plains  groups.  One  indication  of  this  is  the  ease 
with  which  divorce  and  remarriage  are  effected  and  the  freedom  allowed 
women  in  sexual  matters.  If  a  woman  is  unhappy  she  can  always  turn 
elsewhere  or  go  home. 

The  relationship  between  the  patrilineal  family  and  the  wives  who 
have  joined  it  from  outside  is  ideally  one  of  a  cohesive  group  taking  in 
a  stranger.  The  bride  comes  in  to  be  critically  appraised  by  the  extant 
in-group.  She  must  prove  herself  by  her  good  works.  The  new  wife 
finds  herself  at  the  bottom  of  a  well-established  hierarchy.  She  often 
does  not  know  her  husband,  and  in  any  event  his  loyalties  and  respon- 
sibilities are  first  to  the  family.  She  is  under  the  direct  authority  of  her 
mother-in-law  and  the  wives  of  her  husband's  elder  brothers.  She  must 
show  obedience,  respect,  and  deference  to  all  of  her  elders.  She  shows 
respect  by  never  using  the  names  of  the  males  and  elder  females  in  the 
family,  by  never  smoking  in  their  presence  or  laughing  to  their  faces. 
Often  she  is  accepted  and  even  comforted  by  all  or  most  of  the  women 
in  the  household.  Sometimes  she  is  not.  Her  fate  in  this  respect  is  in 
the  unpredictable  hands  of  others,  and  therefore  it  is  an  uncertain  and 
potentially  unpleasant  one.  Consequently  the  tears  of  a  bride  at  leaving 
her  family  of  origin  are  not  entirely  conventional.  As  time  passes  and 
a  wife  proves  her  value  as  a  contributing  member  of  the  family  through 


l68  KIN    GROUPS    AND   KINSHIP 

her  industry  and  skill  and  especially  by  producing  children,  her  po- 
sition becomes  increasingly  secure.  As  younger  sisters-in-law  come  in, 
her  authority  increases.  She  learns  which  family  members  are  her 
friends  and  which  are  not;  to  whom  she  can  turn  for  consolation  and 
from  whom  she  must  keep  her  secrets.  Often  a  woman's  husband  be- 
comes her  strongest  ally  and  will  mediate  on  her  behalf  if  necessary. 
The  husband's  younger  brothers  are  traditionally  her  friends,  and  often 
it  is  only  with  them  that  a  young  wife  is  able  to  establish  an  easy,  in- 
formal friendship.  There  is  something  of  the  "joking  relationship" 
between  these  two  that  is  traditional  over  much  of  North  India.  Sisters- 
in-law  may  become  friends  and  so  may  other  village  wives,  especially 
if  they  have  previous  ties,  as  when  they  are  related  to  one  another  or 
are  from  the  same  village.  In  such  cases  a  woman  may  receive  moral 
support  outside  the  family,  but  her  loyalties  and  responsibilities  must 
remain  with  her  husband's  family.  This  is  true  even  when  her  own  fam- 
ily lives  in  the  same  village.  In  such  a  case  a  woman  is  in  frequent  inter- 
action with  her  family  of  origin,  but  she  must  be  careful  not  to  let 
such  interaction  interfere  with  her  responsibilities  to  her  husband's 
family. 

One  day  in  Sirkanda  a  young  village  wife  who  lived  a  stone's  throw 
from  her  parents'  house  stopped  to  talk  to  her  mother.  The  mother 
and  she  requested  that  she  be  photographed  with  her  infant  daughter. 
When  I  offered  to  do  so  at  once,  they  quickly  declined,  saying  that  the 
girl's  mother-in-law  had  sent  her  to  collect  fodder  and  would  not  like 
it  if  she  delayed  to  be  photographed  at  her  mother's  request.  I  was 
advised  to  come  to  the  mother-in-law  some  time  and  offer  to  take  the 
photograph  without  mentioning  this  prior  arrangement. 

A  woman's  natal  household  gods  may  intervene  in  her  behalf  if  she 
is  mistreated  by  her  husband's  family.  If  worst  comes  to  worst,  it  is 
relatively  easy  for  her  to  escape  to  her  home  or  to  another  potential 
husband.  This  happens  frequently  in  the  village,  though  usually  a 
girl's  parents  return  her  to  her  husband,  often  after  a  conference  with 
her  husband's  family.  In  happier  circumstances  a  wife  from  outside  the 
village  can  expect  to  visit  her  home  about  once  a  year  for  a  few  days 
or  weeks  and  can  expect  to  see  relatives  and  friends  from  her  own  village 
occasionally  on  visits. 

In  visits  to  her  village  of  origin,  among  her  parents  and  siblings  and 
childhood  friends,  a  woman  is  very  free  and  relaxed.  She  is  under  the 
authority  of  parents  and  brothers,  but  it  is  normally  an  indulgent 
authority.  She  has  few  responsibilities  at  home.  Her  brothers'  wives  do 
the  work,  and  she  is  the  guest  of  honor.  There  is  no  one  to  watch  her 
moves  and  report  or  criticize  her  behavior.  She  is  more  likely  to  joke, 


an  hi 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  169 

talk,  or  flirt  with  men  and  dance  if  a  dance  is  held,  than  in  her  hus- 
band's village.  Often  she  uses  the  opportunity  to  carry  on  clandestine 
love  affairs  with  the  men  of  the  village  whom  she  knew  in  her  youth. 
There  is  something  of  the  "double  standard  of  morality"  for  a  woman 
in  the  house  of  her  parents  and  that  of  her  in-laws,  which  is  more  pro- 
nounced in  Jaunsar-Bawar,  where  Majumdar  reports:  "A  woman  has 
two  standards  of  morality  to  conform  to,  one  in  her  parents'  house,  the 
other  in  her  husband's.  In  her  parents'  house  she  is  allowed  every  kind 
of  liberty  and  licence  and  nothing  is  an  offence  unless  specifically  pro- 
hibited" (Majumdar,  1944,  p.  163;  cf.  Saksena,  1955,  p.  36). 

Marriage  is  an  important  event  in  a  man's  life,  too,  but  it  is  not  as 
potentially  traumatic  as  it  is  for  a  woman.  He  remains  in  his  own  fam- 
ily and  village  where  there  are  friends  and  allies  on  every  side  as  con- 
trasted to  the  strangers  and  critics  who  usually  greet  a  bride.  A  man's 
social  situation  changes  relatively  little.  That  his  responsibilities  are 
somewhat  increased  is  recognized  in  the  vows  he  makes  at  marriage.  A 
village  joke  runs  to  the  effect  that  an  unmarried  man  is  a  free  man,  he 
can  run  about  as  he  pleases  "on  two  legs";  a  married  man  is  like  a 
quadruped,  he  must  spend  most  of  his  time  foraging  for  food;  a  man 
with  children  is  like  the  eight-legged  spider,  he  must  weave  a  net  and 
be  ever  ready  at  its  center  to  seize  any  food  that  comes  his  way. 

A  husband  who  visits  his  wife's  home  is  in  the  position  of  all  in-laws. 
He  is  the  honored  and  respected  guest,  but  neither  he  nor  his  hosts 
are  likely  to  feel  at  ease  and  the  visit  is  usually  made  as  short  as  pos- 
sible. Of  course,  in  many  instances,  the  husband  and  his  in-laws  know 
one  another  well  and  may  visit  frequently  and  easily,  but  the  ideal 
pattern  is  one  of  respect  and  distance.  Most  visiting  outside  the  village 
is  with  affinal  relatives,  especially  the  wife's  brothers.  When  a  man's 
in-laws  live  in  his  own  village,  he  is  often  on  close  terms  with  them  and 
frequently  visits  with,  and  works  with,  his  father-in-law  and  brothers- 
in-law.  However,  an  element  of  mutual  respect  is  maintained. 

The  relationship  of  wife  to  husband  is  ideally  one  of  devotion,  serv- 
ice, and  respect.  The  husband  is  referred  to  by  his  wife  as  mdlik,  owner, 
or  simply  "man."  He  makes  the  decisions  and  gives  the  orders,  though 
in  reality  a  wife  may  exercise  as  much  influence  as  their  personalities 
allow,  and  the  henpecked  husband  is  a  familiar  concept. 

A  woman  shows  her  respect  and  devotion  by  catering  to  and  antici- 
pating her  husband's  wishes.  When  he  comes  back  from  a  trip  or  from 
working,  even  if  she  is  tired  herself,  a  wife  will  massage  his  limbs  with 
oil,  feed  him,  prepare  his  pipe  for  him,  and  make  him  comfortable. 
She  will  not  refuse  his  sexual  advances  and  afterwards  will  "replenish 
his  virility"  by  feeding  him  ghee  and  other  milk  products.  She  will  bear 


1»70  KIN    GROUPS   AND    KINSHIP 

and  care  for  his  children,  keep  his  house,  cook  his  meals,  and  do  the 
necessary  household  work  in  the  fields  and  forest.  In  the  words  of  an 
informant, 

A  wife  should  have  three  qualities:  (1)  she  should  be  beautiful,  (2)  she 
should  keep  the  house  in  order,  (3)  she  should  be  able  to  cook  good  food 
when  guests  come.  When  she  has  none  of  these  qualities  it  is  very  sad;  she 
cannot  expect  much  from  her  husband,  and  he  may  leave  her.  My  wife  has 
no  such  virtues,  but  I  cannot  leave  her.  The  chains  of  flesh  are  too  strong — 
I  love  my  children. 

As  has  been  noted  in  the  section  on  death  ceremonies,  widows  are 
not  expected  to  retire  from  public  life  as  is  the  ideal  among  high-caste 
plains  groups.  Pahari  widows  mourn  their  husbands  during  the  thirteen- 
day  mourning  period,  and  many  do  so  for  a  year.  They  take  off  their 
nose  ring  and  do  not  wear  it  again  until  they  have  remarried  or  until 
they  no  longer  wish  to  display  their  respectful  grief  for  the  dead  hus- 
band. The  practice  of  sati,  wherein  a  wife  threw  herself  in  anguish 
upon  her  husband's  funeral  pyre,  was  popular  among  high  castes  in 
the  plains  in  the  seventeenth  and  eighteenth  centuries,  but  was  ap- 
parently never  widely  practiced  in  this  area,  perhaps  partly  because  a 
widow  here  had  no  unpleasant  future  to  dread.  One  sati  did  occur, 
however,  in  Sirkanda  a  few  generations  ago,  and  at  least  two  popular 
Pahari  songs  celebrate  the  stories  of  brave  men  whose  wives  destroyed 
themselves  after  their  husbands'  deaths.  In  general,  the  Pahari  attitude 
is  that  a  wife  should  respect,  honor,  and  obey  her  husband  in  life  but 
that  she  has  little  obligation  to  him  after  the  ceremonies  immediately 
following  death. 

In  return  for  his  wife's  fealty,  a  husband  is  expected  to  provide  for 
her  physical  well-being,  and  is  supposed  to  fulfill  his  obligation  to  have 
sexual  intercourse  with  her  at  least  once  a  month,  and  preferably 
oftener,  as  a  woman  is  believed  to  have  seven  times  the  sexual  energies 
that  a  man  has. 

If  a  man  has  regular  sex  relations  with  his  wife,  she  will  be  happy  and  do 
anything  for  him.  If  he  neglects  her  for  a  while  she  gets  suspicious  and  rest- 
less and  may  start  an  argument  and  accuse  him  of  loving  another.  Divorce 
is  always  due  to  a  man's  failure  to  satisfy  his  wife  in  this  way.  If  he  kept 
her  satisfied  she  would  never  look  elsewhere  and  would  have  eyes  for  no 
one  but  him. 

Also,  a  husband  may  go  out  of  his  way  to  intercede  for  his  wife  in 
intrafamily  matters,  to  see  that  she  has  a  chance  to  visit  her  family 
periodically,  and  to  provide  her  with  things  she  wants  or  take  her  to 
some  fair  or  market  outside  the  village  occasionally. 


KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP  171 

When  a  man  has  more  than  one  wife  he  usually  takes  the  second 
with  the  approval,  and  sometimes  with  the  encouragement,  of  the  first. 
If  the  wives  are  sisters  it  is  expected  that  trouble  between  them  will 
automatically  be  at  a  minimum.  If  not,  they  may  live  in  separate  dwell- 
ings, one  in  the  village  and  one  in  a  chan.  In  former  days  they  more 
frequently  lived  together,  as  chans  were  fewer,  less  productive,  and 
more  isolated  than  today  and  were  therefore  less  suitable  for  year- 
round  occupation.  Whatever  the  arrangement,  polygyny  is  a  potentially 
explosive  situation.  The  first  wife  is  traditionally  the  dominant  one, 
and  her  attitude  toward  the  second  is  much  like  that  of  a  mother-in-law 
or  elder  sister-in-law  toward  a  younger  brother's  wife.  Skill  and  tact  may 
win  more  power  to  a  second  wife,  but  tradition  is  on  the  side  of  the 
first.  The  first  wife  is  especially  likely  to  be  jealous  or  vindictive  if  the 
second  wife  has  been  taken  to  make  up  for  her  own  failure  to  bear 
children,  for  in  such  a  situation  she  may  feel  threatened.  The  mother 
of  a  man's  children  is  likely  to  take  precedence  over  other  wives  in  the 
eyes  of  both  the  husband  and  the  extended  family.  However,  wives  are 
usually  separated  if  they  do  not  get  along  together,  and  many  who 
live  together  do  so  congenially.  They  may  even  cooperate  to  press  de- 
mands on  their  common  husband.  A  husband  must  always  be  careful 
not  to  favor  one  wife  conspicuously  over  the  other.  One  man  com- 
mented in  this  context,  "If  you  get  two  cups  of  tea  from  the  teapot  and 
I  get  only  one  I  will  naturally  be  jealous.  So  it  is  with  wives  sharing  a 
husband."  If  a  co-wife  feels  neglected  she  will  react  just  as  does  a  single 
wife  who  suspects  her  husband  of  having  another  lover.  She  will  sulk, 
do  her  work  poorly  or  not  at  all,  and  try  to  provoke  an  argument  in 
which  to  express  her  charges  against  her  husband.  If  he  is  unable  or 
unwilling  to  make  amends,  she  may  run  away. 

The  relationship  between  a  wife  and  her  husband's  brothers  is  one 
of  considerable  sexual  freedom.  Though  polyandry  is  publicly  ridi- 
culed and  abhorred  by  people  in  this  area,  covert  sexual  relationships 
within  the  family  are  not  greatly  divergent  from  those  among  frater- 
nally polyandrous  families  such  as  those  of  Jaunsar-Bawar  (cf .  Berreman, 
1962a).  Paharis  are  well  aware  of  standard  Hindu  attitudes  on  poly- 
andry and  familial  sexual  freedom,  so  that  these  practices  are  generally 
concealed  from  outsiders.  Despite  such  precautions,  they  have  attained 
a  reputation  for  deviation  from  orthodox  Hindu  behavior.  A  change 
toward  orthodoxy  or  modernity  in  both  attitudes  and  behavior  is 
taking  place  as  some  of  the  younger  and  educated  people  object  to  tra- 
ditional patterns  of  intrafamily  sexual  behavior  and  make  their  feelings 
known. 

The  traditional  view  here  is  that  a  wife's  sexuality  may  be  freely 


172  KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP 

used  not  only  by  her  husband  but  by  his  brothers  as  well.  One  low- 
caste  elder  drew  laughter  from  listeners  when,  in  providing  genealogi- 
cal materials,  he  listed  his  brothers'  wives  as  his  own  in  addition  to  his 
own  wives.  His  response  was,  "What's  the  difference?  They  are  all 
like  wives  to  me."  In  discussing  the  matter  other  informants  said,  "A 
woman  would  never  refuse  herself  to  her  husband's  brother  because 
he  is  in  the  same  relationship  as  her  husband  and  she  would  not  like 
to  create  discord  in  the  family." 

An  elder  brother  has  the  right  to  make  sexual  use  of  his  younger  brothers' 
wives.  Younger  brothers  do  the  same  so  long  as  the  age  difference  is  not  too 
great.  There  is  no  quarreling  or  jealousy  on  this  score.  It  is  their  right,  and 
they  are  expected  to  do  it.  They  don't  do  it  in  the  husband's  presence.  They 
wait  till  he  has  gone  out,  if  only  to  fetch  water,  and  then  approach  his 
wife.  The  wife  will  yield  readily  if  she  likes  the  brother,  but  even  if  she 
doesn't  he  can  insist.  If  she  is  angry  she  may  tell  the  man's  wife,  and  the 
wife  will  scold  him  for  forcing  himself  on  the  unwilling  woman.  Usually 
such  things  are  kept  secret  only  from  the  wife  who  may  be  jealous.  A  brother 
should  not  be  jealous  on  these  grounds.  If  a  woman  wishes  she  may  send 
her  sister-in-law  on  errands  in  order  that  she  may  have  access  to  the  girl's 
husband. 

A  woman  is  obligated  to  satisfy  her  husband's  sexual  wants  and  her 
husband  always  takes  precedence,  but  she  should  not  deny  the  re- 
quests of  his  brothers  either.  Informants  were  incredulous  that  rela- 
tions between  a  man  and  his  brother's  wife  could  be  expected  to  lead 
to  divorce,  if  discovered,  in  some  cultures.  A  husband  has  no  justifiable 
grounds  for  complaint  if  his  wife  has  relations  with  his  brothers  as 
long  as  he  is  given  precedence  and  is  not  denied  his  own  sexual  rights 
and  as  long  as  the  relations  are  carried  on  discreetly,  away  from  the 
house  or  in  his  absence.  In  reality  husbands  do  occasionally  complain 
on  this  score.  If  a  man's  brother  is  overly  attentive  to  the  man's  wife 
he  may  abuse  the  brother  by  saying,  "You  have  been  eating  my  feces" 
— a  circumlocution  which  serves  as  a  warning  to  the  brother  to  pay 
less  attention  to  his  sister-in-law. 

If  a  wife  is  suspected  of  extrafamilial  affairs  or  is  going  to  work  in 
the  jungle  where  such  liaisons  can  easily  be  made,  her  mother-in-law  or 
elder  sister-in-law  may  send  one  of  her  husband's  brothers — often  an 
unmarried  one — to  accompany  her  or  to  work  in  the  same  area.  This 
protects  the  wife  from  the  advances  of  nonfamily  members  and  en- 
courages relationships  between  her  and  her  brother-in-law.  "It  pro- 
tects our  wives'  honor  from  men  outside  the  family."  It  is  assumed  that 
every  wife  has  at  least  occasional  relations  with  her  husband's  brothers, 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  173 

and  this  is  a  typical  way  in  which  boys  are  initiated  into  adult  sexual 
activities. 

Such  freedom  does  not  cross  generational  lines,  and  if  it  did  it  would 
be  considered  a  serious  and  reprehensible  deviation.  Generation  is  an 
important  boundary  in  all  sex  relations.  This  is  reflected  in  the  preju- 
dice against  relations  between  a  very  young  man  and  a  much  older 
sister-in-law.  Brothers'  and  parallel  cousins'  wives  are  available  as  part- 
ners; wives  of  sons,  of  brother's  sons,  of  father's  brothers  are  not.  The 
kinship  terminology  for  a  younger  brother's  wife,  who  is  available 
sexually,  and  for  a  son's  wife,  who  is  not,  is  the  same,  but  this  fact  ap- 
parently does  not  bear  on  the  current  behavioral  situation.  One  case 
was  reported  in  Sirkanda  in  which  a  man  made  advances  to  his 
daughter-in-law,  but  she  was  promptly  recalled  to  her  parents'  home 
and  was  not  returned  to  her  husband.  A  middle-aged  and  much-married 
man  who  took  as  wife  the  wife  of  his  young  classificatory  uncle  was 
widely  criticized  for  crossing  the  generational  boundary. 

Great  sexual  freedom  is  practiced  outside  the  extended  family  by 
both  men  and  women.  It  is  assumed  to  be  virtually  a  foregone  conclu- 
sion that  if  a  man  and  woman  meet  alone  in  the  jungle,  intercourse 
will  ensue.  The  nature  of  the  terrain  and  of  the  work  engaged  in  by 
both  men  and  women  make  such  meetings,  planned  or  not,  frequent. 
Clandestine  liaisons  occur  regularly,  often  with  the  connivance  of  the 
female  age-mates  of  the  woman.  There  are  well-known  signals  and 
other  means  of  arranging  these.  Few  women  are  considered  unap- 
proachable in  such  matters,  and  it  is  thought  to  be  unlikely  that  any 
woman  would  refuse  an  insistent  request.  As  in  the  case  of  the  Lepchas, 
".  .  .  casual  sexual  relationships  are  so  unimportant  emotionally 
.  .  .  that  few  women  would  think  it  worth  while  making  a  fuss" 
(Gorer,  1938,  p.  160).  While  villagers  may  overestimate  the  frequency 
of  casual  sexual  contacts,  it  seems  likely  that  most  men  and  women  of 
the  same  general  age  and  caste  status  in  the  village,  outside  of  the 
exogamous  sibs,  have  had  relations  with  one  another.  Some  lasting 
liaisons  have  been  established.  Instances  of  cross-caste  and  in-sib  re- 
lationships are  also  known. 

The  difference  between  all  such  relations  and  those  between  brothers 
and  their  wives  is  that  in  the  former  cases  legitimate  grounds  for  com- 
plaint exist,  whereas  within  the  family  there  is  no  such  sanction.  If  a 
husband  wishes  to  press  a  charge  of  persistent  adultery  outside  the 
family  he  can  usually  win  the  support  of  the  community  to  bring  about 
divorce,  punishment,  or  a  promise  to  desist.  Even  a  wife  may  be  sup- 
ported in  presenting  such  a  charge.  A  similar  charge  against  a  brother 


174  KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP 

would  be  laughed  off  or  hushed  up  in  the  family  as  mere  bickering. 
In  line  with  the  shift  toward  adoption  of  plains  behavior  and  San- 
skritization  in  general,  there  is  apparently  a  tendency  away  from  the 
pattern  of  sharing  a  wife's  sexuality  among  brothers.  Some  high-caste 
families,  perhaps  under  the  influence  of  the  outside  Brahmin  who  per- 
forms their  rituals  and  is  the  most  vocal  advocate  of  Sanskritization  in 
the  village,  express  an  orthodox  Hindu  view  on  this  matter.  They  state 
that  an  elder  brother's  wife  should  be  respected  like  a  mother,  a  younger 
brother's  wife  should  be  treated  like  a  sister  or  daughter.  This  view  is 
found  in  association  with  disapproval  of  bride  price  (also  a  Sanskritic 
attitude),  but  both  are  often  practiced  by  their  detractors.  One  young 
man  in  the  village  was  quite  upset  by  the  fact  that  his  wife  had  lived 
openly,  for  over  a  year,  with  his  elder  brother  in  a  chan.  When  she 
returned  to  the  family  house  to  bear  her  husband's  brother's  child,  to 
be  known  officially  as  her  husband's  child,  intrafamily  tension  grew 
until  the  young  wife  suddenly  discarded  her  nose-ring  (symbolic  of 
marriage)  and  ran  away  to  her  own  village.  It  was  later  found  that  she 
was  possessed  by  a  ghost  who  impelled  her  to  take  this  action,  and 
she  nearly  died  of  its  affliction  before  she  was  brought  back  to  her 
husband's  village,  where  the  ghost  was  exorcised.  After  she  gave  birth 
the  problem  was  solved  by  a  familial  announcement  that  the  baby  was 
the  elder  brother's.  Thenceforth  the  baby's  parents  were  considered 
man  and  wife  and  a  new  wife  was  to  be  procured  for  the  dispossessed 
younger  brother.  It  was  largely  at  the  insistence  of  the  younger  brother 
that  this  solution  was  reached. 


The  relationship  among  nuclear  families  in  the  joint  family  is  above 
all  a  combination  of  the  various  specific  relationships  mentioned  above. 
Nuclear  families  or  larger  subdivisions  of  the  extended  family  are  the 
units  which  remain  together  when  the  extended  family  breaks  up. 
Despite  the  frequency  of  divorce,  there  is  a  unity  within  the  nuclear 
family  which  in  some  cases  is  stronger  than  that  which  runs  through 
the  extended  family.  The  break-up  of  extended  families  follows  mutual 
agreement  among  the  separating  units  that  they  can  get  along  better 
separately  than  they  could  together.  Most  often  the  break-up  is  among 
cousins  (sons  of  brothers)  and  is  blamed  on  their  wives.  It  is  said  that 
wives  drive  a  wedge  between  brothers  (classificatory  as  well  as  "real" 
brothers).  A  wife  complains  to  her  husband  that  she  and  he  are  doing 
more  than  their  fair  share  of  work  in  the  family  and  perhaps  that 
other  nuclear  units  are  expending  more  than  their  share  of  the  in- 
come. Behind  this  is  often  sister-in-law  jealousy,  and  particularly  re- 
sentment of  the  domination  of  an  elder  sister-in-law.  The  husband 
finally  becomes  convinced  or  willing  and  expresses  his  desire  to  separate. 


UN   GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP  175 

Eventually  a  division  may  be  effected.  Wives  are  often  blamed  for  what 
s  really  fraternal  strife.  Brothers  are  supposed  to  get  along  with  one 
mother  harmoniously  and  to  respect  their  elders.  Therefore,  if  they 
:annot  get  along  in  the  joint  family,  it  is  socially  more  acceptable  to 
)lame  their  strife  on  disputing  wives  who,  as  outsiders,  do  not  reflect 
m  the  family  reputation  as  directly  as  do  brothers. 

Division  of  the  joint  family  may  thus  be  brought  about  by  disputes 
tmong  brothers  or  cousins,  though  for  sake  of  appearance  it  may  be  \ 

attributed  to  friction  among  wives.  The  Brahmin  family  in  Sirkanda 
vas  on  the  verge  of  dividing  its  lands  into  three  parts  in  1958,  as  a  re- 
ult  of  the  feeling  by  each  of  the  three  Brahmin  brothers  that  he  was 
:ontributing  more  than  his  share  and  getting  less  in  the  joint  economic 
irrangement.  This  split  was  to  occur  despite  the  fact  that  their  elderly 
nother  was  still  living.  As  a  first  step  in  the  dissolution  of  this  joint 
amily,  the  fields  were  being  marked  off  into  three  equal  parts  and  a 
arge  house  containing  three  separate  dwelling  units  was  being  built 
o  replace  the  less  spacious  one  the  joint  family  had  shared.  In  this 
nstance  the  old  house  furnished  part  of  the  materials  for  the  new  one. 
n  other  cases  the  old  house  has  remained  in  use  by  one  of  the  new 
amily  units,  has  been  given  to  a  Dom  for  occupancy,  or  has  been 
bandoned.  As  has  been  pointed  out,  low-caste  brothers  more  frequently 
livide  their  property  than  do  those  of  high  castes.  This  difference  is 
vidently  related  to  their  occupations.  In  the  agricultural  high  castes 
and  can  best  be  worked  by  large  joint  families,  but  the  occupations 
»f  artisans  can  be  efficiently  performed  by  smaller  family  units. 

While  Sirkanda  and  its  component  extended  families  have  increased 
n  population,  there  has  apparently  been  no  commensurate  increase 
n  the  frequency  of  breakdowns  into  smaller  family  economic  units 
is  is  reported  for  other  parts  of  India.  Some  informants,  in  fact,  re- 
>orted  that  proportionately  fewer  splits  occur  now  than  in  former 
lays;  that  joint  families  have  become  larger  rather  than  smaller.  This 
rend,  which  is  not  in  the  direction  one  might  expect,  is  attributed  to 
he  fact  that  in  former  days  the  entire  joint  family  occupied  a  single 
touse  where  its  members,  and  particularly  the  wives,  were  constantly 
n  contact  with  one  another  and  disputes  were  frequent.  Disputes  led 
o  disintegration  of  the  joint  family  because  disputing  groups  within 
t  could  only  avoid  conflict  by  moving  out,  and  moving  out  meant 
etting  up  a  new  household.  Few  families  had  chans  in  those  days,  and 
:hans  were  isolated  and  surrounded  by  relatively  little  cultivated  land, 
o  that  they  were  not  suitable  for  year-round  living.  Now  most  families 
lave  chans  or  second  houses.  There  are  several  chans  at  most  locations, 
ind  the  lands  have  been  developed  so  that  year-round  occupancy  is 


176  KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP 

possible  and  even  necessary  in  terms  of  the  crops  and  animals  to  be 
cared  for.  Many  nuclear  family  units  are  now  separated  from  others 
within  the  same  joint  family.  They  thus  avoid  the  friction  that  is 
inevitable  in  the  close  daily  contact  of  a  shared  dwelling.  With  less 
frequent  disputes  and  with  the  possibility  that  a  disgruntled  nuclear 
family  can  live  in  another  dwelling,  there  is  less  pressure  to  divide 
family  property.  The  joint  family  remains  intact  as  an  economic  unit 
while  it  no  longer  remains  a  residential  unit. 

Between  half-siblings  of  polygynous  marriages  there  is  often  no  love 
lost.  This  probably  reflects  the  relationship  between  the  co-wives  who 
were  their  mothers.  Such  rivalry  is  common  knowledge  among  villagers 
and  finds  expression  in  folklore.  Frequently  in  adult  life  the  dislike 
takes  the  form  of  merely  ignoring  the  half-sibling  or  having  little  or 
nothing  to  do  with  him.  Sometimes  it  takes  the  form  of  continual  dis- 
puting or  unfriendly  rivalry.  In  one  family  in  Sirkanda  it  is  the  basis 
for  a  four-generational  factional  split.  In  most  of  the  reported  cases 
half-brothers  have  divided  their  father's  property  into  separate  eco- 
nomic units  after  his  death. 

Lineage 

The  patrilocal  extended  family  is  the  most  important  social,  eco- 
nomic, and  ritual  unit  in  most  phases  of  life  in  Sirkanda.  There  are, 
however,  more  inclusive  kin  groups  which  are  relevant  in  certain  con- 
texts. The  smallest  of  these  may  best  be  termed  the  "lineage" — a  con- 
sanguineal  kin  group  that  traces  common  descent  through  known  an- 
cestors, in  this  case  male  ancestors  and  therefore  a  patrilineal  group 
(see  fig.  3).  In  practice  in  Sirkanda  this  unit  usually  excludes  married 
sisters  and  daughters  and  includes  wives  of  the  male  lineage  members. 
As  such  it  resembles  a  "compromise  kin  group"  in  Murdock's  formu- 
lation, combining  unilineal  descent  with  residential  unity,  so  that 
lineage  members  who  live  away  from  the  group  are  excluded  from  it 
and  nonlineage  members  who  live  with  the  group  are  included  in  it. 
I  will  here  refer  to  this  unit  in  Sirkanda  as  the  lineage  because  the  uni- 
linear rule  of  descent  is  paramount;  lineage  ties  do  not  disappear  in 
fact  or  theory  at  marriage.  This  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  women  are 
accepted  heartily  as  lineage  members  when  they  visit  their  parents' 
homes.  Lineages,  as  segments  of  sibs,  are  strictly  exogamous.  A  woman 
has  sex  relations  with  her  husband's  brothers,  real  and  classificatory, 
but  never  with  people  of  her  own  lineage  or  sib.  When  a  woman  is 
widowed  or  divorced  she  either  marries  her  husband's  brother  or  is 
accepted  back  into  her  parents'  household,  where  subsequent  marriages 


KIN    GROUPS   AND    KINSHIP  177 

are  arranged  with  reference  to  her  parents'  lineage  and  sib  rather  than 
that  of  her  husband,  that  is,  for  considerations  of  exogamy.  The  lineage 
of  her  erstwhile  husband  is  disregarded  except  that  it  is  reimbursed  if 
she  leaves  voluntarily.  It  should  be  remembered,  however,  that  resi- 
dence, in  combination  with  lineage,  is  important  in  daily  life.  As  long 


Jawari  Rajput  Lineages 


Lineag 

•  = 
1 

e  I 

A  =  • 
1 

=  • 
1 

Lineage 

n 

=A 
1 

1 

•  =  A 

1 

•=i              •  =   !: 

A     A            A  «|i 

1 
•=A 

1 

•=A 

I 

1 
•=A 

| 

A 

1              1 
L     -A 

1 

1 
A 

1 

A 

1 

A 

1 

A 

Minimal  Lineages  A,B,C 
(Relationship  to  one  anothe 
A-"" 

Lineage  III  (Maximal 

funcertain)       \ 

NB 
•=A 

1 

Lineage) 

~~~~~~— -  C 

r 

1              1 

•=A 

1 

1               1 

1               1 

1 

1 

1 
1 

1 

l          1 

l              l 
•=A         *=A 

1 
•=A 

1 

1               1 
A        0=A 

1 
A 

1 

A 

1 
A 

1                                 1 

A            A 

1 
A 

•=A 

1 

Low-Caste 
1 

Lineages 
•=A 

,          1 

1 

A 

1 
•=A 

A         A(l 

1                1 
A              A 

r 

A 

1 
A 

mmigrant) 

Blacksmiths 

I 

3ajgis 

A  deceased  ancestor 


A  living  household  head 


Fig.  3.  Sample  lineage  structures. 


as  a  woman's  husband  lives,  she  participates  in  the  ritual,  social,  and 
economic  activities  of  his  lineage  and  sib.  If  she  dies,  her  funeral  is 
performed  by  her  husband's  family,  not  her  family  of  origin.  But  she 
retains  her  identification  with  her  lineage  of  origin.  In  short,  she  be- 
comes a  member  of  her  husband's  clan,  the  compromise  kin  group  de- 


178  KIN    GROUPS   AND    KINSHIP 

termined  by  descent,  residential  unity,  and  social  integration  (Mur- 
dock,  1949,  p.  68)  but  not  of  his  sib. 

The  lineage  is  termed  khandan  locally,  and  its  component  house- 
holds are  called  "hearths."  In  Sirkanda  there  are  few  households  which 
do  not  belong  to  lineages  containing  several  households.  As  genera- 
tions pass,  lineage  connections  in  the  larger  village  castes  grow  dim 
and  eventually  are  forgotten  as  subsidiary  divisions  assume  lineage 
proportions.  The  male  Sirkanda  members  of  each  caste  except  Rajputs 
— the  Brahmins,  blacksmiths,  barbers,  and  all  of  the  Bajgis  except  the 
immigrant  one — belong  to  single  lineages  as  well  as  single  sibs  within 
their  respective  castes.  There  are  at  least  nine  Rajput  lineages. 

Three  of  the  Rajput  lineages  in  Sirkanda  are  named.  They  have 
acquired  the  names  of  honored  ancestors  from  whom  their  members 
trace  common  descent.  One  of  these  lineages  is  well-known  for  its 
devotion  to  the  worship  of  the  Pandavas  and  for  the  special  attention 
the  Pandavas  show  its  members  in  return.  Corroborative  stories  are 
told  of  this  relationship.  In  two  of  these  lineages  the  common  descent 
of  members  can  be  accurately  traced.  In  the  third  there  are  three 
named  sublineages  or  minimal  lineages  within  which  common  descent 
is  easily  traced  but  between  which  the  relationship  has  grown  hazy. 
If  the  names  persist  and  the  relationship  of  the  sublineages  is  for- 
gotten, the  sublineages  may  be  elevated  to  lineage  status  and  the  present 
lineage  would  then  become  a  kind  of  sub-sib  and  might  conceivably 
assume  sib  significance,  just  as  sibs  (jatis,  see  discussion  below)  may 
have  succeeded  gotras  as  sib  units  in  this  area.  At  present  the  three 
sublineages  together  resemble  a  maximal  lineage  in  that  together  they 
are  considered  a  lineage  relative  to  others,  while  each  of  the  three 
component  sublineages  is  considered  to  be  a  lineage  relative  to  the 
other  two. 

Four  other  Rajput  lineages  are  distinct,  while  the  remaining  two 
are  known  to  be  related  to  one  another  but  have  drifted  apart  as  the 
ties  of  relationship  have  been  forgotten.  None  of  these  is  a  named 
lineage. 

The  typical  lineage  contains  three  or  four  households.  The  largest 
contains  eleven,  but  it  is  the  one  which  is  now  reduced  in  reality  to 
three  sublineages.  The  largest  intact  lineage  has  seven  component 
households.  Beyond  the  household  it  is  the  members  of  the  lineage 
unit  who  are  most  likely  to  participate  actively  in  the  life-cycle  cere- 
monies of  their  members.  They  tend  to  support  one  another  in  social 
situations,  to  worship  the  same  gods,  and,  of  course,  to  honor  the  same 
ancestors.  In  short,  they  share  a  feeling  of  common  identification  and 
a  somewhat  more  homogeneous  culture  than  occurs  across  lineage 


KIN    GROUPS   AND    KINSHIP  179 

lines,  though  less  homogeneous  than  that  within  the  extended  family. 
There  is  also  a  tendency  toward  residential  proximity  within  the 
lineage,  based  apparently  on  common  origin.  The  lineage  has  in- 
herited from  people  who  once  held  property  in  common,  and  it  is  part 
of  this  property  upon  which  houses  have  been  built.  Factions  tend  to 
follow  lineage  lines,  but  here  the  exceptions  almost  equal  the  examples 
in  their  frequency. 

Kindred 

Not  all  the  people  significantly  related  to  one  another  in  Sirkanda 
are  related  through  the  male  line.  There  is  a  circle  of  kinfolk  recog- 
nized as  relatives  of  the  individual,  who  are  related  to  him  through 
either  one  or  the  other  parent,  that  is,  bilaterally.  They  will  be  termed 
the  kindred,  following  Murdock  (1949,  pp.  46,  56,  61).  The  kindred 
form  a  group  only  from  the  point  of  view  of  the  individual  to  whom  all 
are  related.  They  do  not  comprise  a  self-conscious  identification  group. 
The  kindred's  common  interest  is  focused  specifically  on  an  individual 
who  ties  it  together  on  certain  occasions,  notably  life-cycle  ceremonies. 
Such  bilateral  relationship  is  widely  recognized  in  Northern  India.  The 
common  name  for  the  kindred  is  sapinda,  mentioned  above  (p.  158)  in 
the  discussion  of  marriage  regulations.  Although  this  term  is  not  com- 
monly used  in  Sirkanda,  the  concept  is  prevalent. 

Those  who  are  born  of  one  body  are  Sapinda.  A  child  is  a  Sapinda  of  his 
father  and  mother.  He  is  also  the  Sapinda  of  his  father's  brothers,  sisters, 
father  and  grand-father  as  also  of  his  mother's  brothers  and  sisters,  father  and 
grand-father.  He  is  Sapinda  to  his  cousins  (father's  sister's  children,  mother's 
sister's  children,  father's  brother's  children  and  mother's  brother's  children) 
as  he  shares  with  them  common  body-particles  either  from  his  mother's  side 
or  from  his  father's  side.  In  this  meaning  of  the  word  Pinda,  a  common 
kinship  of  blood  is  established  with  both  the  father's  and  mother's  side. 
(Karve,  1953,  p.  55) 

As  has  been  noted,  one  cannot  marry  within  the  sapinda  group, 
though  its  boundaries  are  variously  defined  even  for  this  important 
function.  In  other  situations  the  kindred  is  variable  in  its  extent  and 
inclusiveness.  As  in  its  function  of  regulating  choice  of  marriage  part- 
ner, the  function  of  the  kindred  in  ceremonial  activities  is  parallel  to 
that  described  by  Murdock  (1949,  pp.  56  f.)  for  American  society 
where  ".  .  .  its  members  are  collectively  called  'kinfolk'  or  'relations,' 
[and]  it  includes  that  group  of  near  kinsmen  who  may  be  expected  to 
be  present  and  participate  on  important  ceremonial  occasions  such  as 
weddings,   christenings,   funerals.  .  .  ."    Kindred  serve  many   of   the 


l8o  KIN    GROUPS    AND   KINSHIP 

same  functions  as  lineage  members,  and  in  fact  by  definition  kindred 
membership  overlaps  greatly  with  that  patrilineal  group.  Participation 
of  kindred  in  ceremonial  functions  is  likely  to  be  less  intensive  than 
that  of  the  lineage  simply  because  kindred  are  residentially  separated 
and  include  relatives  whose  relationship  to  one  another  is  traditionally 
one  of  mutual  respect  and  even  avoidance.  They  do  not  identify  them- 
selves as  a  group.  Kindred  are  not  bound  by  diffuse,  interconnected 
group  ties.  It  is  in  this  crucial  respect  that  the  kindred  differs  from  the 
lineage  group,  which  is  closely  bound  by  ties  of  consanguinity  and  com- 
mon identification  to  which  any  particular  individual  is  incidental. 

Sib 

Above  the  lineage  in  degree  of  assumed  patrilineal  relationship 
is  the  sib  (jat  or  more  often  jati  in  local  parlance).  In  this  named  kin 
group,  relationship  in  the  patrilineal  line  is  assumed  but  cannot  be 
traced.  It  is  the  effective  exogamous  unit  within  the  caste,  and  it  ex- 
tends across  village  boundaries.  It  occurs  most  prominently  among 
Brahmins  and  Rajputs.  Judging  by  sib  names  and  local  tradition,  some 
sib  names  may  have  derived  from  a  former  place  of  residence  of  the 
group — indicating,  perhaps,  that  local  exogamy  was  there  the  rule.  If 
some  sibs  did  originate  in  this  way,  local  exogamy  ceased  to  be  the  rule 
when  people  emigrated  from  the  villages  in  which  it  was  practiced  to 
new  localities,  such  as  Sirkanda,  where  people  of  other  villages  or  areas 
settled.  The  other  migrants  were  potential  mates  because  they  were 
from  other  villages,  and  their  common  residence  in  Sirkanda  was 
deemed  irrelevant  for  marriage  purposes.  That  is,  the  ancestral  vil- 
lages of  some  Sirkanda  Rajputs  may  have  been  exogamous.  If  so,  when 
they  settled  in  the  present  location,  they  may  have  excluded  from 
marriageability  their  former  village  affiliates  but  not  the  members  of 
their  new  local  group.  In  that  way,  former  village  affiliation  would 
have  become  important  so  that  the  names  of  those  villages  were  used 
to  identify  the  exogamous  group  (hence  sib).  Other  groups  evidently 
carried  their  sib  names  with  them  from  the  plains  or  adopted  those  of 
plains  groups.  The  latter  explanation  seems  the  most  probable  in  light 
of  available  evidence. 

As  has  been  mentioned  in  chapter  1,  some  116  Rajput  sibs  have  been 
listed  for  Garhwal.  These  include  three  of  the  four  found  in  Sirkanda 
(Raturi,  1928,  pp.  167  ff.).  The  names  of  these  three  (Jawari,  Palial, 
Khandial)  are  attributed  in  that  listing  to  the  names  of  the  villages  in 
which  their  ancestors  settled.  Whether  the  sib  got  its  name  from  the 
village  or  vice  versa  is  a  moot  question.  The  village  name  was  likely 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  101 

derived  from  its  early  settlers  or  founders,  though  it  may  then  have 
been  adopted  by  subsequent  immigrants.  Tod  (1829,  p.  120)  lists 
"eighty-four  mercantile  tribes"  of  Rajasthan  among  which  are  "Pilli- 
wal,"  "Khandailwal,"  and  "Kakulea,"  which  are  apparently  three  of 
the  Rajput  sib  names  of  Sirkanda.  He  suggests  that  the  Palial  (Pilliwal, 
Palliwal)  group  originated  in  Palli,  the  great  commercial  market  of 
western  Rajasthan.  "A  community  of  Brahmins  then  held  Palli  in 
grant  .  .  .  whence  comes  a  numerous  class,  termed  Palliwal,  who  fol- 
low mercantile  pursuits"  (Tod,  1829,  p.  700).  Bahadur  (1916)  mentions 
a  "Pyal"  Rajput  group  (an  alternative  pronunciation,  according  to  a 
Sirkanda  informant)  which  is  said  to  have  come  to  Garhwal  from  Delhi. 
This  could  well  be  the  same  group  or  a  branch  of  it.  Villagers  them- 
selves retain  no  traditions  on  the  matter  beyond  assertions  that  their 
people  came  from  various  locations  in  the  Kumaon  Hills  to  the  east 
and  that  sib  names  indicate  the  village  of  origin.  The  sib  names  of 
two  village  wives  were  said  to  be  the  names  of  their  villages  of  origin 
in  Garhwal.  One  village  man  said,  "Jati  is  named  for  the  place  where 
a  member  of  the  caste  went  and  settled.  His  descendants  carry  this 
name."  Another  attributed  it  to  the  name  of  an  ancestral  leader  who 
brought  his  people  to  some  new  locality.  A  glance  at  the  village  map 
(map  3)  will  show  that  sibs  retain  a  pattern  of  residential  proximity, 
though  it  is  not  rigidly  followed  and  most  villagers  are  not  even  aware 
of  it.  It  probably  reflects  the  fact  that  sib  ancestors  settled  in  one  loca- 
tion when  they  first  came  to  the  village  as  a  group,  and  that  this  loca- 
tion has  remained  somewhat  intact  through  patrilineal  inheritance  of 
land  and  houses. 

The  low  castes  claim  such  kin  groups  and  utilize  them  as  exogamous 
units  just  as  do  the  high  castes.  Among  low  castes  the  units  are  ap- 
parently of  varied  origin — some  are  the  jati,  gotra,  or  caste  names  of 
alleged  high-caste  ancestors.  Some  are  the  personal  names  of  particular 
ancestors,  and  some  may  be  place  names.  Some  may  well  be  lineage 
names  of  fairly  recent  origin.  The  low  castes  may  often  have  adopted 
names  in  imitation  of  high-caste  practice,  as,  in  fact,  Khasiya  Rajputs 
may  also  have  done  in  earlier  days.  In  any  event,  the  named  groups  are 
in  effect  sibs,  and  they  are  referred  to  as  jatis  or  gotras.  Insufficient 
data  were  collected  on  low-caste  marriages  of  any  one  caste  to  determine 
precisely  the  extent  to  which  their  "sibs"  are  important  or  to  verify 
their  functioning.  The  data  that  were  collected  and  the  testimony  of 
informants  showed  no  consistent  differences  at  this  level  between  high- 
caste  and  low-caste  sibs  in  marriage  regulation.  Both  conform  equally 
well  to  the  definition  of  sib.  Differences  are  apparently  of  origin  and 
extent  rather  than  of  local  functioning. 


182  KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP 

Since  all  non-Rajput  castes  in  Sirkanda  contain  only  single  lineages 
(except  for  the  single  immigrant  Bajgi),  they  are  also  made  up  of  single 
sibs;  for  example,  the  local  Brahmins  are  of  the  Kotari  sib.  Among 
Rajputs  four  sibs  are  represented:  Jawari,  comprising  20  households 
and  three  main  lineages,  including  the  one  which  is  in  effect  three 
sublineages  at  present;  Palial,  comprising  11  households  and  three 
lineages;  Kukhalwal,  comprising  five  households  and  two  lineages;  and 
Khandial,  comprising  a  single  household  and  lineage.  Within  these 
sibs  the  lineage  divisions  are  sufficiently  recent  that  the  tradition  of 
interlineage  relationship  is  strong,  strong  enough  that  the  term  khandan 
(lineage)  is  applied  to  each  of  the  four  local  Rajput  sibs  as  wholes  as 
well  as  to  their  component  lineages.  A  Rajput  elder's  comment  on  the 
subject  was  typical:  "Our  Khandan  divided  seven  generations  back, 
but  now  no  one  remembers  who  the  people  were  who  divided  it."  In 
other  contexts  people  distinguish  khandan  as  lineage  from  jati  as  sib. 
The  term  biradari  (brotherhood)  is  also  used  to  designate  the  sib. 
Among  low  castes  this  term  is  applied  to  the  entire  caste  group. 

The  significance  of  sib  groupings  is  primarily  in  establishing  bound- 
aries of  marriage  eligibility.  Members  of  the  same  sib  are  never  po- 
tential marriage  partners.  Neither  are  people  whose  mothers  were  in 
the  same  sib.  A  secondary  function  is  participation  in  ritual.  The  entire 
local  sib  unit  is  supposed  to  observe  a  degree  of  ritual  pollution  after 
the  death  of  a  member,  and  to  a  lesser  extent  the  sib  functions  as  does 
the  lineage  in  other  life-cycle  ceremonies.  Actually,  since  the  group 
involved  in  ritual  is  localized  and  for  some  purposes  includes  wives 
of  sib  members,  it  is  perhaps  more  properly  termed  the  clan.  It  appears 
likely  that  the  lineages  may  eventually  replace  sibs  or  clans  in  these 
functions,  as  sib  and  clan  responsibilities  in  this  context  seem  to  be 
decreasing  in  importance  in  the  minds  of  villagers. 

Sibs  and  clans  also  enter  into  faction  formation.  Although  there  are 
many  factions  within  sibs,  and  factions  which  separate  sibs,  relatively 
few  cut  across  sib  lines  allying  members  of  different  sibs  against  their 
sib-fellows.  That  sib  identification  is  still  a  real  factor  in  the  village  is 
indicated  by  sib  loyalties.  In  reference  to  the  founding  of  Sirkanda, 
each  of  the  larger  sibs  claims  precedence.  A  member  of  either  one  is 
likely  to  disparage  the  members  of  the  other,  especially  to  compare 
them  unfavorably  in  terms  of  wealth,  honesty,  or  Sanskritization  of 
ritual  observances  and  marriage  regulations.  An  old  Jawari,  head  of 
the  largest  household  in  his  sib,  said,  "We  Jawaris  were  the  first  Raj- 
puts here.  Then  those  Palials  showed  up,  and  our  forefathers  let  them 
settle  here  too.  We  don't  know  where  they  came  from  or  who  they 
are.  Hell,  we  don't  even  know  if  they're  Rajputs — we  just  took  their 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  183 

word  for  it!"  The  speaker's  wife  of  40  years,  mother  of  his  five  adult 
sons,  is  a  Palial.  There  is  considerable  rivalry  between  the  sibs,  as 
evidenced  in  all  their  relationships  and  recorded  in  disputes,  court 
cases,  and  recently  in  voting  patterns  in  elections  of  village  officers. 
The  divisions  are  not  rigid,  but  they  do  show  up. 

There  is  no  concept  of  hierarchical  ranking  of  sibs  in  the  village — 
all  are  equally  prestigeful.  Some  sibs  or  larger  subcaste  groupings  out- 
side the  village  are  thought  of  as  more  or  less  prestigeful.  Among  the 
Brahmins  and  low  castes  prestige  of  subcastes  is  often  related  to  oc- 
cupational specialization.  Ceremonial  cooks  (Sarola)  are  ritually  purer 
than  family  priests.  Carpenters  often  consider  themselves  higher  than 
blacksmiths.  Among  Rajputs  and  some  Brahmin  groups  the  place  of 
origin  is  important.  Plains  groups  are  more  prestigeful  than  Pahari 
ones;  that  is,  those  admitting  the  appellation  "Khasa"  are  lower  than 
some  of  those  denying  it.  Among  some  low  castes  prestige  is  related  to 
alleged  high-caste  ancestry.  These  distinctions  do  not  come  into  play 
in  the  village  and,  except  in  the  case  of  Sarola  Brahmins,  they  rarely 
crop  up  in  Bhatbair.  With  the  exception,  again,  of  Sarola  Brahmins, 
they  are  unimportant  in  determining  marriage  relationships  within 
this  area,  although  they  do  assume  significance  in  some  outside  ar- 
rangements. No  evidence  of  subcaste  hypergamy  appeared  in  the 
research. 


Clan 

The  clan  in  Sirkanda  is  made  up  basically  of  the  local  members 
of  one  sib  together  with  their  wives.10  As  such  it  is  very  closely  iden- 
tified with  the  sib,  and  its  functioning  often  cannot  readily  be  dis- 
tinguished from  that  of  the  sib  or  the  lineage.  It  is  an  unnamed,  overtly 
unrecognized  group  which  can  be  of  considerable  analytic  utility.  Its 
core  is  the  local  portion  of  the  patrilineal  sib.  It  is  distinguished  from 
the  sib  by  the  fact  that  it  is  a  compromise  kin  group  (Murdock,  1949, 
p.  66),  that  is,  it  includes  some  people  on  the  basis  of  their  local 
residence  who  are  not  tied  to  it  by  consanguinity,  and  it  excludes 
some  on  the  basis  of  their  outside  residence  who  do  have  consanguineal 
ties  to  its  members.  It  includes  the  wives  of  local  members  of  the  sib, 
and  it  excludes  their  married  sisters  and  daughters.  It  also  excludes 
sib-fellows  of  other  villages  and  areas.  It  functions  to  include  the 
occasional  adopted  son  who  is  of  another  area  or  another  sib,  and  the 
rare  man  who  marries  into  the  local  sib  matrilocally.  Conversely,  it 
excludes  the  local  boy  of  the  sib  adopted  elsewhere  and  the  rare 
local  man  of  the  sib  who  marries  outside  and  lives  in  his  wife's  village. 


184  KIN    GROUPS    AND   KINSHIP 

The  third  criterion  of  a  clan  (in  addition  to  a  uniiineally  related 
core  and  residential  unity)  is  social  integration.  This  is  a  feature  of 
Sirkanda  clans  which  becomes  most  apparent  at  times  of  ceremonial 
participation.  Confusion  easily  arises  at  this  point,  since  villagers 
themselves  do  not  recognize  the  clan  as  a  group.  When  describing 
life-cycle  and  other  ceremonies,  they  describe  the  participants  as  mem- 
bers of  the  family,  lineage,  sib,  kindred,  caste,  or  community,  depend- 
ing upon  the  nature  of  the  participation.  In  their  descriptions  of  sib 
participation,  however,  it  is  often  apparent  that  they  are  including 
local  members  of  the  sib  and  their  spouses  and  excluding  nonlocal 
members  of  the  sib,  that  is,  they  are  describing  participation  of  the 
clan,  as  that  term  is  defined  by  Murdock.  Even  "lineage"  participation 
often  proves  to  include  wives  of  lineage  members  and  to  exclude 
lineage  members  who  live  elsewhere;  it  includes  the  most  closely  asso- 
ciated clan  group  centering  on  the  lineage,  rather  than  the  lineage 
itself. 

The  concept  of  the  clan,  as  distinguished  from  the  sib,  provides  a 
consistent  explanation  for  a  number  of  otherwise  perplexing  features 
of  Pahari  social  organization.  First,  of  course,  is  the  composition  of  the 
groups  which  participate  in  ceremonies.  While  family,  kindred,  caste, 
and  community  are  social  units  which  can  account  for  many  of  the 
non-unilineally  related  participants  in  ceremonies,  the  clan  more  suc- 
cinctly defines  the  local,  socially  integrated  group  centered  on  a 
uniiineally  related  sib,  but  including  other  individuals,  which  par- 
ticipates in  several  kinds  of  ceremonies. 

Second,  the  clan  concept  clarifies  the  complex  matter  of  changes  in 
group  affiliation,  identification,  and  inheritance  which  accompany 
changes  in  residence  at  the  times  of  marriage  and  adoption  (in  the 
relatively  rare  cases  where  adoption  occurs  across  sib  lines).  Without 
the  concept  of  clan  this  has  proved  difficult  to  understand.  Wives, 
adopted  sons,  and  matrilocally  resident  men  stoutly  deny  that  they 
have  altered  their  sib  affiliations  when  they  go  to  live  among  people  of 
another  sib.  Yet  some  informants  claim  that  they  have  done  so.  Cer- 
tainly, for  some  purposes,  they  have  severed  ties  with  their  natal  groups 
and  have  established  ties  with  new  groups.  To  explain  this  in  terms 
of  complex  alterations  in  sib  affiliation  and  responsibilities,  as  is 
usually  done,  is  both  confusing  and  inaccurate.  Sib  ties  have  not  been 
altered.  What  has  happened  is  that  clan  affiliation  has  changed.  The 
individual  has  ceased  to  be  a  member  of  one  localized  clan  and  has 
become  a  member  of  another.  If  the  relationship  is  terminated  and 
the  person  returns  to  his  natal  group  (as  when  an  adopted  son  leaves 
his  foster  family)  or  joins  yet  another  group    (as  when  a  divorced 


KIN    GROUPS   AND    KINSHIP  185 

woman  remarries)  then  clan  affiliation  is  changed  again  without  diffi- 
culty. Clan  affiliation  is  as  easily  changed  as  is  residence,  but  sib 
affiliation  is  inherited  and  unalterable.  This  is  the  affiliation  which  is 
important  (by  delimiting  the  exogamous  group)  in  determining  mar- 
riage. Thus,  a  woman  of  sib  A  and  clan  a  who  marries  a  man  of  sib 
B  becomes  a  member  of  clan  b  when  she  goes  to  live  with  him,  but 
she  remains  in  sib  A.  She  has  sexual  relations  with  her  brothers-in- 
law  in  sib  B  as  well  as  with  her  husband,  and  upon  being  widowed 
or  divorced  she  may  marry  someone  else  in  sib  B.  If  it  were  claimed 
that  upon  marriage  she  had  become  a  member  of  sib  B,  these  relation- 
ships would  be  incestuous  and  therefore  prohibited. 

When  a  man  dies,  the  wives  of  his  local  sib-fellows  participate  in 
the  mourning  insofar  as  women  participate  at  all.  His  married 
daughters  and  nieces  do  not.  When  a  wife  dies,  her  major  funeral 
ceremonies  are  performed  by  the  clan-fellows  she  acquired  by  mar- 
riage, including  those  extending  beyond  the  extended  family,  but  are 
not  performed  by  her  sib-fellows.  A  lingrd  stone  (see  Appendix  IIIC), 
symbolizing  that  the  deceased  woman  is  one  with  Shiva,  is  placed  with 
those  of  the  rest  of  the  dead  of  the  local  clan  group.  It  is  not  sent 
back  to  rest  with  those  of  her  sib-fellows.  A  woman  participates  in 
the  life-cycle  ceremonies  of  her  clan-fellows  much  more  consistently 
and  actively  than  in  those  of  her  sib-fellows.  Moreover,  an  adopted 
son  or  a  son-in-law  resident  in  his  wife's  father's  house  can  perform 
the  father's  funeral  rites  and  can  inherit  his  property.  In  this  manner 
property  can  pass  from  one  sib  to  another.  The  lingra  stones  of 
adopted  sons  and  resident  sons-in-law  are  placed  with  those  of  the 
family  with  which  they  reside.  The  stones  are  not  sent  back  to  rest 
with  those  of  their  family  of  origin.  This  practice,  like  inheritance 
by  an  adopted  son,  does  not  depend  upon  a  change  in  sib  affiliation; 
rather  it  depends  primarily  upon  place  of  residence  and  therefore 
upon  clanship.  A  sib-fellow,  lineally  related,  is  preferred  to  perform 
funeral  rites  and  to  inherit  property,  but  failing  such  a  person,  a 
clan-fellow  can  substitute.  One  who  lacks  both  sib  and  clan  ties  (for 
example,  a  son-in-law  resident  in  his  natal  household)  is  not  eligible 
under  normal  circumstances.  These  facts  emphasize  the  social  struc- 
tural importance  of  the  residence  group.  If  funeral  participation  is 
described  as  primarily  involving  the  household,  lineage,  and  clan,  with 
lesser  participation  by  the  sib,  kindred,  caste,  and  community;  if 
patrilocal  marriage  is  viewed  as  entailing  a  change  in  clan  affiliation 
for  the  woman,  and  if  adoption  and  matrilocal  residence  are  viewed 
as  entailing  a  change  in  clan  affiliation  for  the  man,  then  these  prac- 
tices are  consistent  and  more  readily  understood  than  if  one  were  to 


i86 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP 


assume  that  there  is  no  significant  change  in  group  affiliation  at  mar- 
riage or  adoption  or  that  sib  affiliation  is  changed  at  these  times.11 
Therefore,  the  local  compromise  kin  group,  the  clan,  assumes  greater 
significance  in  ritual  and  ceremonial  participation  (especially  that 
surrounding  life-cycle  ceremonies)  than  does  the  sib.  The  unilineal 


V,  Sib 
'x-'Clan 


KEY 


Head   of  household 
Ultimate  recipient  of 
property  of  household   head 


"Normal"  household  (patrilocal) 


Matrilocal  son-in-law  (x) 


,'<g>0 


I 
I 

IO=A(x)    i 


Matrilocal  son  (x)  Adopted  son  (x) 

Fig.  4.  Sib  and  clan  affiliations  in  Sirkanda  families.  From  Berreman  (1962c). 

descent  group,  the  sib,  determines  eligibility  for  marriage  and  is  the 
preferred  means  for  determining  inheritance.  It  is  the  core  around 
which  the  clan  is  formed.  Sirkanda  villagers  lump  these  analytically 
distinguishable  groups  under  a  single  term,  jati,  which  literally  refers 
to  the  sib.  They  tend  to  think  of  wives  as  members  of  their  husbands' 
sibs  in  the  ceremonial  context  and  as  members  of  their  natal  sibs 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  187 

in  most  other  contexts.  They  think  of  adopted  sons  as  members  of  the 
family  of  adoption  for  purposes  of  ritual  and  inheritance,  and  as 
members  of  their  natal  families  for  purposes  of  marriage.  In  most 
cases  (other  than  those  involving  determination  of  limits  of  exogamy) 
they  think  of  the  sib  in  terms  of  its  local  membership,  that  is,  those 
sib  members  who  live  in  one  village  or  in  closely  adjacent  villages. 
A  clear  distinction  between  clan  and  sib,  as  such,  is  not  made  by 
villagers,  but  it  is  implicit  in  their  own  conceptualization  of  their 
social  organization.  This,  combined  with  its  analytical  utility,  make  it 
worth  distinguishing.  The  "clan"  is  somewhat  less  sharply  defined — 
less  a  corporate  group — than  one  would  wish  if  use  of  the  term 
"clan"  were  to  be  fully  justified. 


Gotra  (Phratry) 

The  exogamous  unit  among  high  castes  over  much  of  India  is 
called  the  gotra.  In  many  areas  this  unit  amounts  to  a  patrilineal  sib 
(cf.  Lewis,  1958,  p.  23;  Dube,  1955,  pp.  42  f.).  Gotras  appear  in 
Sirkanda  and  are  said  by  educated  villagers  to  derive  from  the  names 
of  twenty-four  great  religious  teachers  or  ascetics  who  founded  vast 
lineages  whose  descendants  in  the  male  line  retain  the  name  of 
the  founder  as  the  gotra  name.  A  local  Brahmin  explained: 

Gotras  are  called  by  the  names  of  great  rishis  who  were  founders  of  the 
original  families.  Bharadwaj  was  a  great  rishi.  Some  of  his  children  went 
into  religious  work,  and  their  descendants  are  Bharadwaj  Brahmins.  Others 
among  his  children  went  into  the  work  of  governing,  and  their  descendants 
are  Bharadwaj  Rajputs.  Jawari  [a  sib  name]  was  the  name  of  the  headman  of 
a  group  of  Bharadwaj  Rajputs  who  came  and  settled  in  one  place  in  these 
hills.  Now  his  descendants  are  Jawari  Bharadwaj  Rajputs. 

Tod  (1829,  P-  27)  explains  gotra  origin  in  a  similar  way.  Others 
describe  Brahmin  gotras  as  deriving  from  a  lineal  ancestor's  name, 
while  Rajput  gotras  derive  from  the  name  of  the  religious  preceptor 
(guru)  of  a  lineal  ancestor.  In  any  event,  the  same  gotras  are  found 
among  both  Brahmins  and  Rajputs  in  this  area,  but  among  no  other 
castes,  and  remote  common  ancestry  for  Brahmins  and  Rajputs  is 
assumed  by  some. 

On  the  basis  of  his  research  in  "Kalapur,"  a  plains  village,  Hitch- 
cock (1956,  pp.  43  ff.)  refers  to  this  usage  of  the  term  "gotra"  as 
"Brahmanical."  "Nothing  in  our  data  shows  that  the  gotra  concept 
in  the  Brahmanical  sense  now  has  any  functional  significance  for 
marriage  .  .  ."  (ibid.,  p.  45).  However,  he  reports  that  it  is  used  in 


1 88  KIN    GROUPS   AND    KINSHIP 

a  second  sense  (the  sense  common  on  the  plains)  to  refer  to  the  sib — 
a  usage  parallel  to  the  Pahari  use  of  the  term  "jati"  as  described  here. 

In  Sirkanda  the  low-caste  sibs  are  sometimes  termed  "gotra,"  and 
sometimes  "jati."  Only  the  high  castes  have  both  units  consistently 
and  distinguish  them  precisely.  Even  among  them  "gotra"  does  not 
mean  what  it  means  among  many  plains  groups.  The  term  "gotra," 
as  Hitchcock's  comment  would  suggest,  does  not  mean  the  same  thing 
throughout  India  to  those  who  use  it.  "Sometimes  a  caste  is  divided 
into  exogamous  groups  called  Gotra  with  no  further  division.  Some- 
times a  caste  is  divided  into  exogamous  Gotras  or  endogamous  Gotras 
with  further  smaller  divisions"   (Karve,  1953,  p.  118). 

In  Sirkanda  there  are  two  gotras  among  the  Rajputs:  Bharadwaj, 
which  includes  the  sibs  Jawari  and  Kukhalwal,  and  Kasib,  which 
includes  the  sibs  Palial  and  Khandial.  The  Brahmin  gotra  in  Sirkanda 
is  also  Kasib.  Each  gotra  includes  many  sibs — an  estimated  20  to  50 
in  each  gotra — but  only  two  of  each  are  represented  among  Sirkanda 
Rajputs.  In  addition,  there  are  at  least  ten  other  gotras  in  this 
general  area. 

Both  the  Sirkanda  gotras  receive  mention  by  Tod  as  having  been 
present  in  Rajasthan.  He  refers  to  an  ancient  lineage  in  which,  in 
the  fifteenth  recorded  generation,  nine  brothers  "  '.  .  .  took  to  the 
office  of  religion,  and  established  the  Causika  Gotra  or  tribe  of 
Brahmins.'  From  the  twenty-fourth  prince  in  lineal  descent  from 
Yayat,  by  the  name  of  Bhardwaja,  originated  a  celebrated  sect,  who 
still  bear  his  name  and  are  the  spiritual  teachers  of  several  Rajpoot 
tribes"  (Tod,  1829,  p.  27).  Rajputs  and  others  took  the  gotra  names 
of  their  priests  when  they  adopted  the  gotra  system  (Karve,  1953, 
p.  115).  This  constituted  an  early  step  in  Brahmanization  or  San- 
skritization. 

Gotra,  like  sib,  is  an  inherited  affiliation  passed  down  patrilineally. 
Since  sibs  are  subdivisions  of  gotras,  the  gotra  contains  many  sibs 
but  one  sib  never  spans  two  gotras.  Gotras  therefore  fit  the  definition 
of  phratry,  wherein  ".  .  .  two  or  more  sibs  recognize  a  purely  con- 
ventional unilinear  bond  of  kinship  .  .  ."  (Murdock,  1949,  p.  47). 
Among  Rajputs  in  Sirkanda  this  would  amount  to  a  moiety  division 
because  there  is  a  division  into  two  phratries.  This  is  fortuitous:' 
neighboring  villages  have  one,  three,  or  more  phratries. 

In  Sirkanda  and  the  surrounding  region,  gotra  is  not  now  a  func- 
tional unit  in  marriage  regulations.  Joshi  (1929,  p.  272)  states,  "The 
Khasas  have  no  real  gotras.  Mr.  Atkinson  noted  that  they  all  stated 
themselves  to  belong  to  the  Bharadwaj  gotra,  and  had  no  idea  of  what 
'gotra'  meant."  As  a  Sirkanda  Rajput  said,  "People  must  marry  in 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  l8g 

their  own  caste  and  they  cannot  marry  in  their  own  sib  or  their 
mother's  sib.  That  is  all  that  matters  in  marriage.  Gotra  is  just  a 
name,  it  doesn't  mean  anything."  In  this  respect  these  people  are 
not  unique,  as  indicated  by  Hitchcock  in  the  discussion  noted  above. 
Karve  reports  that  among  the  Rajputs  of  Rajasthan  and  among  the 
Kayasthas  of  Uttar  Pradesh,  gotras  do  not  seem  to  have  any  function 
in  marriage  relations  (Karve,  1953,  pp.  119,  141).  On  the  other  hand, 
ultimate  common  ancestry  in  the  gotra  is  admitted.  This  is  consistent 
with  Murdock's  point  (1949,  p.  47)  that  the  larger  the  kin  group, 
the  less  likely  it  is  to  be  exogamous. 

Among  Sirkanda  Rajputs  there  are  six  possible  sib  combinations 
for  marriage  within  the  village  based  on  the  division  into  four  sibs. 
All  six  have  occurred  among  the  53  marital  unions  that  were  recorded 
as  having  been  contracted  among  the  four  village  sibs.  Of  the  six 
possibilities,  two  are  in-gotra  combinations  and  four  are  cross-gotra 
combinations,  based  upon  the  division  of  the  four  sibs  into  two  gotra 
groups  (phratries  or  moieties).  Since  the  two  large  sibs  are  in  opposite 
gotras  and  since  four  of  the  six  possible  sib  combinations  in  marriage 
are  gross-gotra  ones,  cross-gotra  marriages  would  be  expected  to  pre- 
dominate among  those  contracted  within  the  village.  This  proves  to 
be  true,  with  39  of  53  marriages  across  gotra  lines.  However,  14  in- 
gotra  marriages  were  also  recorded,  virtually  all  of  which  were  first 
marriages.  This  is  actually  greater  than  the  expectable  proportion. 
Half  (5  of  10)  of  the  in-village  marriages  of  members  of  the  smallest 
sib  (Khandial),  for  example,  were  in-gotra  ones,  whereas  well  under 
half  of  all  potential  mates  in  the  village  for  these  people  have  been 
in  their  own  gotra  (at  present  38  per  cent  of  the  village  population 
is  in  this  gotra  and  out  of  this  sib). 

Almost  two-thirds  (9  of  15)  of  the  in-village  marriages  of  the  other 
small  sib  (Kukhalwal)  were  in-gotra  ones,  although  potential  mates 
in  the  village  for  these  people  have  been  about  equally  split  between 
the  same  and  opposite  gotras  (at  present  58  per  cent  of  the  population 
is  in  this  gotra  and  out  of  this  sib).  The  relatively  high  rates  of  in- 
village  and  in-gotra  marriage  in  small  sibs  reflect  the  larger  number 
of  potential  mates  in  the  village  for  members  of  small  sibs  (those  with 
small  population  in  the  village)  as  contrasted  to  members  of  large  sibs. 

I  do  not  suggest  that  in-gotra  marriage  is  preferred.  There  is  a 
tendency  in  this  direction  within  the  village,  but  it  is  not  based  upon 
a  large  enough  sample  to  establish  significance,  and  in  any  event  when 
extravillage  marriages  are  included  it  is  an  even  less  impressive  trend. 
What  I  have  demonstrated,  however,  is  that  gotra  does  not  enter 
into  regulation  of  marriage  contracts  in  this  area.  There  is  no  prefer- 


igO  KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP 

ence  for  cross-gotra  marriages  over  in-gotra  ones.  This  substantiates 
verbal  testimony.  No  Sirkanda  informant  expressed  a  feeling  that 
gotras  should  play  a  part  in  marriage  arrangements,  and  no  case  was 
reported  in  which  they  did.  Few  villagers  know  their  gotras  and  fewer 
yet  know  those  of  their  wives,  whereas  everyone  knows  his  own  sib, 
and  many  know  the  sibs  of  their  wives.  Precisely  the  same  situation 
obtains  for  Brahmins,  except  among  those  who  are  better-informed 
because  they  deal  in  horoscopes  and  life-cycle  rites  where  gotras  are 
mentioned.  Interestingly  enough,  the  "gotra  puja"  is  an  integral  part 
of  every  Sanskritized  Pahari  marriage  ceremony,  which  includes  most 
first  marriages  these  days.  In  this  puja,  taken  directly  from  the  religious 
prescriptions  of  the  "great  tradition,"  the  gotra  affiliations  of  the  bride 
and  groom  are  repeated  many  times  over  in  the  recitation  of  the 
sacred  verses.  The  history  and  honor  of  the  gotras  that  are  being 
joined  by  marriage  is  reiterated.  In  Sirkanda  the  gotras  so  described 
and  honored  are  sometimes  one  and  the  same.  This  is  perplexing  to 
many  high-caste  non-Paharis  who  learn  of  it.  However,  even  the  most 
sophisticated  of  the  Brahmins  who  function  in  Bhatbair  see  no  con- 
tradiction in  the  practice.  It  may  be  expected  that  plains  emulation 
will  result  in  the  attaching  of  greater  importance  to  gotra  in  the  future, 
as  has  happened  among  upwardly  mobile  castes  of  the  plains. 

The  gotra  unit  was  found  to  be  virtually  nonfunctional  among 
Sirkanda  Rajputs,  in  both  theory  and  practice,  in  every  sphere  of 
life.  The  only  suggestive  evidence  that  the  gotra  is  of  any  importance 
is  the  fact  of  residential  proximity  of  several  households  of  the  two 
sibs  comprising  the  Bharadwaj  gotra  in  the  easternmost  of  the  two 
Sirkanda  settlement  areas.  This  is  probably  the  original  village  site 
(map  3).  If,  as  is  likely,  this  is  more  than  a  chance  occurrence,  it  is  not 
recognized  as  such  in  the  village  and  it  has  no  detectable  ramifications 
beyond  those  of  residential  proximity  found  elsewhere  in  the  village. 
I  would  speculate  that  it  represents  early  common  association  or  com- 
mon origin  of  the  two  sibs,  so  that  when  they  settled  here  they  built 
houses  near  one  another.  More  recent  building  has  not  followed  this 
pattern  and  it  is  not  noticeable  in  other  sections  of  the  village,  al- 
though, as  has  been  noted  previously,  residential  unity  of  lineages 
and  sibs  is  found  fairly  consistently. 

Among  the  lower  castes  there  are  apparently  no  gotras  in  the  sense 
of  phratries  such  as  those  found  in  the  high  castes.  Some  claim  to 
have  them,  but  these  usually  prove  to  be  sibs.  Sometimes  non-sib  names 
are  given  in  addition  to  sib  names  but  they  are  usually  lineage  names, 
names  of  ancestors,  names  of  localities,  or  subcaste  occupational  terms 
and  are  recognized  only  over  a  very  limited  area  by  fellow  caste- 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  1C)1 

members.  Sometimes  the  names  apply  to  precisely  the  same  group 
as  the  sib  name,  even  though  they  are  given  as  gotra  and  are  dis- 
tinguished from  jati.  It  is  not  unlikely  that  real  phratries  do  exist 
among  some  low  castes  in  this  area,  but  none  was  found  in  Sirkanda. 
Such  claims  are  apparently  attempts  at  achieving  Sanskritic  respect- 
ability. Said  a  Bajgi,  "We  are  just  like  Rajputs  and  Brahmins  in  that 
respect.  We  have  the  same  divisions  and  marriage  rules.  Some  other 
low  castes  don't  have  that,  but  we  do."  The  high  castes  do  not  concur 
in  this:  "The  low  castes  have  regulations,  but  they  don't  have  the 
same  kind  we  do  and  they  are  lax  about  these  matters." 

Kinship 

In  order  to  understand  the  aggregates  of  related  individuals  that 
have  been  referred  to  above  as  kin  groups,  it  is  necessary  to  understand 
the  kinship  system,  the  system  of  relationships  defined  in  terms  of 
consanguinity  and  affinity  which  exists  among  people.  This  is  codified 
in  the  system  of  terms  used  by  people  in  addressing  and  referring  to 
one  another.  The  terms  are  given  in  Appendix  IV.  In  Sirkanda,  terms 
of  reference  and  address  are  generally  identical,  although  the  latter 
are  sometimes  contractions  of  the  former  (didi  jl  becomes  dijl).  The 
most  prominent  exceptions  are  cases  in  which  terms  of  reference  are 
avoided  in  address  between  persons  who  stand  in  a  relationship  of 
respect  or  conventional  social  distance.  Sometimes  in  reference  de- 
scriptive terminology  is  used  for  clarity,  especially  when  a  term  applies 
to  more  than  one  kind  of  relative.  Specific  exceptions  are  noted  below 
and  in  Appendix  IV. 

In  order  to  characterize  Pahari  kinship  relative  to  other  systems 
that  have  been  reported,  we  may  refer  to  the  criteria  by  which  kin 
are  classified  suggested  by  Murdock  (1949,  pp.  100-106). 

In  Pahari  kinship,  generation  is  specified  with  these  exceptions:  the 
term  for  wife  (reference)  and  for  junior  female  affine  (address)  and 
that  for  husband  (reference)  and  young  male  affine  (address),  apply 
in  all  generations.  Terms  for  father's  brothers  apply  also  for  spouse's 
sisters'  husbands.  Sex  is  specified  in  all  terms.  Affinity  is  specified  in 
most  terms  of  reference.  That  is,  consanguineal  relatives  are  not 
referred  to  by  the  same  terms  as  affinal  relatives.  The  primary  ex- 
ception to  this  is  a  pattern  of  equating  close  affinal  relatives  within 
a  generation  to  consanguineal  relatives  of  that  generation.  A  man 
refers  to  his  wife's  brothers'  wives  as  he  would  to  his  own  sister,  and 
a  woman  refers  to  her  husband's  sisters'  husbands  as  she  would  to 
her  own  brothers.  A  person's  mother's  brother   is   terminologically 


10,2  KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP 

equated  to  his  father's  sister's  husband,  and  his  father's  brother  is 
equated  to  his  mother's  sister's  husband.  The  same  equation  is  made 
in  the  grandparental  generation.  This  resembles  a  moiety  distinction. 
It  is  elaborated  to  the  point  that  a  man  refers  to  his  wife's  sisters' 
husbands  as  "co-brother"  or  "half-brother."  He  addresses  and  refers  to 
his  mother's  sisters  as  "elder  mother"  or  "younger  mother,"  the  same 
terms  by  which  he  addresses  his  father's  co-wives.  There  is  a  special 
term  of  reference  for  father's  co-wives.  A  woman  addresses  her  hus- 
band's brothers'  wives  as  her  sisters,  although  they  are  distinguished  by 
terms  of  reference.  Her  husband's  sister's  husbands  are  referred  to 
as  her  own  brothers.  Thus,  members  of  one's  own  patrilineage  are 
equated  to  affines  of  one's  mother's  or  spouse's  patrilineage,  and  mem- 
bers of  one's  mother's  or  spouse's  patrilineage  are  equated  to  affines 
of  one's  own  lineage.  This  might  suggest  that  there  is  or  was  a  norm 
of  sororal  polygyny  or  a  custom  of  brothers  of  one  family  marrying 
sisters  of  another.  Both  types  of  marriage  occasionally  occur,  but  there 
is  no  independent  evidence  that  either  has  ever  been  common  or  pre- 
ferred. Therefore,  we  can  safely  say  only  that  there  is  a  tendency  to 
identify  relatives  of  a  single  generation  terminologically  as  members 
of  a  single  household,  which  potentially  they  are.  It  is  here  that  the 
criterion  of  affinity  is  ignored  in  kinship  terminology. 

Collaterality,  that  is,  the  degree  of  relationship  in  the  consanguineal 
line,  is  ignored  except  in  the  distinction  between  father  and  father's 
brothers  and  in  that  between  mother  and  mother's  sisters.  In  the 
latter  case  the  terms  are  derivatives  of  that  for  mother,  meaning  "elder 
mother"  and  "junior  mother."  Otherwise,  merging  is  the  rule.  Bifur- 
cation, distinguishing  whether  the  connecting  relative  is  male  or 
female,  is  an  important  criterion  in  Pahari  kinship.  Whether  the 
person  who  links  two  relatives  is  a  mother  or  a  father,  a  brother  or 
a  sister,  a  wife  or  a  husband,  is  specified  terminologically.  Relatives 
linked  by  sons  and  by  daughters  are  not  distinguished  from  one  an- 
other, however.  Polarity,  use  of  the  same  kinship  term  reciprocally  by 
two  relatives,  is  found  only  in  affinal  relationships  between  people  of 
the  same  generation  where  the  affinal  link  is  in  the  first  descending 
generation  from  the  relatives  using  the  reciprocal  term.  Relative  age, 
whether  the  person  referred  to  is  elder  or  younger,  is  always  specified 
among  consanguineal  relatives  of  the  same  generation.  In  address, 
relative  age  of  cousins  and  siblings  is  sometimes  ignored.  Among 
affinal  relatives,  it  is  the  relative  ages  of  the  connecting  relatives  that 
are  crucial.  For  example,  whether  a  wife's  brother's  wife  will  be 
referred  to  by  the  term  which  means  elder  sister  or  that  for  younger 
sister  depends  upon  whether  that  woman's  husband  is  an  elder  or 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  193 

younger  brother  of  ego's  wife.  Generation  always  takes  precedence 
over  age  in  determining  seniority.  An  uncle  who  is  younger  than  his 
nephew  should  still  be  accorded  the  respect  due  his  generation  by 
the  nephew.  Speaker's  sex  is  not  a  factor  in  Pahari  kinship,  nor  is 
decedence  (whether  the  connecting  relative  between  two  relatives  is 
living  or  dead). 

Pahari  kinship  can  now  be  analyzed  according  to  Murdock's 
typologies  of  kinship  terminology,  based  primarily  upon  cousin  terms 
(Murdock,  1949,  pp.  223  ff.). 

In  Sirkanda  siblings  and  all  cousins,  cross  and  parallel,  related 
through  mother  and  father,  are  called  by  terms  which  vary  only  by 
sex  and  relative  age.  The  terms  are:  elder  brother  or  male  cousin, 
dlda;  younger  brother  or  male  cousin,  bhula;  elder  sister  or  female 
cousin,  didl;  younger  sister  or  female  cousin,  bhuli.  The  same  pattern 
appears  in  kin  terms  recorded  for  the  Western  Pahari  dialect  (Karve, 
1953,  pp.  98  ff.).  This  is  the  standard  "Hawaiian"  type  of  cousin 
terminology  in  Murdock's  classification.  Since  in  Sirkanda  this  termi- 
nology is  associated  with  exogamous  patrilineal  kin  groups,  the  system 
conforms  by  definition  to  Murdock's  "Guinea"  type  of  social  organ- 
ization, and  since  these  groups  are  patrilocal,  it  belongs  in  the  "normal 
Guinea"  subtype.  Murdock  (1949,  pp.  225  f.)  includes  ten  criteria  in 
his  discussion  of  types  of  social  organization.  These  will  be  briefly 
presented  for  Sirkanda:  (1)  descent:  patrilineal;  12  (2)  cousin  terms: 
Hawaiian  type;  (3)  residence:  patrilocal;  (4)  clans-demes:  groups 
closely  resembling  patri-clans  are  analytically  discernible,  and  demes 
are  absent;  (5)  other  kin  groups:  bilateral  kindreds  present;  (6) 
exogamy:  patrilineal  exogamy  and  bilateral  extension  of  incest  taboos 
(all  second  cousins  ineligible  for  marriage,  though  deviations  occur); 
(7)  marriage:  polygyny  permitted,  incidence  around  15  per  cent; 
sororal  polygyny  permitted,  incidence  around  20  per  cent  of  polyg- 
ynous  marriages;  (8)  family:  patrilocal  extended  family;  (9)  aunt 
terms:  bifurcate  collateral,  that  is,  separate  terms  for  mother,  mother's 
sister,  and  father's  sister  (the  mother's  sister's  terms  are,  however, 
derivatives  of  the  mother  term,  which  indicates  a  tendency  toward 
bifurcate  merging,  and  Karve  [1953,  pp.  98,  100]  reports  terms  in- 
dicating bifurcate  collateral  terminology  for  both  mother-aunts  and 
daughter-nieces  in  the  Western  Pahari  language);  (10)  niece  terms: 
bifurcate  merging,  that  is,  one  term  for  daughter  and  brother's 
daughter,  another  for  sister's  daughter.  All  these  data  were  obtained 
from  men,  but  so  far  as  could  be  determined,  the  same  terminology 
is  used  regardless  of  whether  a  man  or  woman  is  speaking.  This  con- 
forms to  usage  elsewhere  in  North  India  (cf.  Karve,  1953,  pp.  99  f.,  104). 


ig4  KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP 

In  a  patrilocal,  patrilineal  society  such  as  this,  patrilineal  relation- 
ship and  male  relatives  would  be  expected  to  be  more  prominent  than 
matrilineal  relationship  and  female  relatives.  This  is  true  in  that 
the  kindred  extends  farther  on  the  paternal  side  than  on  the  maternal 
one.  But  in  accounting  for  greater  refinement  of  terminological  dis- 
tinctions, residence  seems  to  be  a  more  important  factor.  Those  rela- 
tives among  whom  there  is  or  might  be  repeated  interaction  are  mem- 
bers of  the  residential  group — the  patrilocal  extended  family.  They 
are  the  ones  among  whom  the  most  refined  terminological  distinctions 
are  made,  especially  those  having  to  do  with  relative  age.  Those  who 
are  not  in  the  patrilocal  group  (mother's  brothers)  and  those  who  leave 
it  (father's  sisters)  are  in  less  frequent  interaction  and  are  not  dis- 
tinguished as  to  relative  age.  Father's  brothers  are  in  this  group,  and 
mother's  sisters  potentially  could  be  (in  line  with  the  Pahari  kinship 
terminological  pattern,  they  are  called  by  terms  indicating  that  they 
are).  Both  of  these  categories  are  distinguished  by  age  relative  to  the 
connecting  relative.  Seniority  is  an  important  matter  to  be  kept  in 
mind  among  those  who  interact  frequently,  for  it  has  significant  be- 
havioral concomitants. 

Affinal  relatives  outside  one's  own  generation  are  classified  under 
fewer  terms  than  are  consanguineal  relatives,  suggesting  the  lesser 
emphasis  placed  on  affinal  relatives  and  the  greater  social  (and  in  the 
case  of  a  man,  physical)  distance  between  a  person  and  his  affinal 
relatives. 

Something  has  already  been  said  of  the  behavior  of  various  relatives 
toward  one  another.  Husbands  and  wives  never  address  one  another 
by  name  nor  by  the  term  of  reference.  Rather,  teknonymy  is  generally 
resorted  to  ("father  of  X,"  "mother  of  X").  Often  a  wife  is  addressed 
in  the  household  as  "girl"  (chori).  In  reference  by  the  spouse,  gharwall 
(one  of  the  house,  housewife),  or  "woman,"  is  used  most  often  for  a 
wife,  and  malik  (owner),  or  "man,"  for  a  husband.  Similarly  the  terms 
for  mother-in-law  and  father-in-law  are  never  used  in  address.  They 
are  avoided  by  teknonymy  or  other  circumlocutions  and  indirections 
because  they  are  relationships  of  respect.  All  younger  relatives  or  those 
who  wish  to  show  respect  add  the  honorific  jl  to  the  relationship 
terms,  especially  in  address.  Minor  phonetic  changes  often  accompany 
this  addition.  In  the  table  in  Appendix  IV  this  information  has  been 
omitted  except  where  it  always  occurs  in  both  reference  and  address. 

There  is  a  tendency  in  Sirkanda  to  adopt  some  kinship  terms  com- 
mon among  Hindi  speakers  of  the  adjacent  plains  and  distinct  from 
Pahari  terms.  Most  often  these  appear  as  variants  rather  than  as  sub- 
stitute terms.  Those  Hindi  terms  most  frequently  used  simplify  or 


KIN    GROUPS    AND    KINSHIP  195 

make  more  symmetrical  the  terminological  structure.  Thus  the  Hindi 
term  mausa,  husband  of  a  senior  woman  (mother's  sister's  husband, 
wife's  elder  sister's  husband,  husband's  elder  sister's  husband)  tends 
to  be  used  in  place  of  the  more  complex  set  of  Pahari  terms  for  these 
rather  distant  and  seldom-seen  relatives.  In  three  cases  distinct  Pahari 
terms  for  affines  are  replaced  with  Hindi  terms  derived  from  the  term 
for  the  consanguineal  relative  connecting  ego  and  the  affine,  making 
a  pair  of  terms  for  a  man  and  wife  that  are  identical  except  in  ending. 
For  example,  Hindi  pupha  replaces  Pahari  mama  as  husband  of  puphu. 
A  trend  toward  consistency  seems  to  explain  the  changes  shown  in 
table  3. 

TABLE  3 
Some  Variations  in  Kinship  Terminology  a 


dldi  esh:   bahena 

bhull  ysh:  said 

dldi  web:   bahena 

bhull  wyb:  said 


Traditional  local  terms 

Newer,  H 

es:  dldi        esh:  jijd 
ys:   bhull     ysh:  jawai 

Wife  of  web:  didi      web:  jeThu 
Wife  of  wyb:   bhull    wyb:  syalu 

es: 

ys: 

wife  of  web: 
wife  of  wyb: 

See  Appendix  IV  for  meanings  of  the  abbreviations. 


Use  of  Kin  Terms  for  Non-Kin 


In  a  number  of  situations  kinship  terminology  is  applied  outside 
the  kin  group. 

Most  common  in  this  respect  is  the  general  tendency  to  address 
anyone  of  roughly  one's  own  age  in  friendly  and  respectful  greeting 
by  the  term  "brother"  or,  in  the  case  of  a  woman,  "sister."  This 
usage  occurs  often  in  addressing  strangers  and  is  common  among 
Hindi  speakers  throughout  Northern  India.  "Puphu"  (father's  sister) 
may  be  used  respectfully  to  address  any  older  woman.  There  is  no 
general  practice  of  referring  to  fellow  villagers  (as  distinct  from  mem- 
bers of  other  villages)  by  kin  terms  as  is  done  in  the  plains.  This  may 
reflect  the  fact  that  Sirkanda  is  not  an  exogamous  village,  and  so  all 
villagers  are  not  thought  of  as  relatives. 

In  Sirkanda  close  friendship  between  two  men  sometimes  results  in 
their  consistently  addressing  and  referring  to  one  another's  wives  as 
"sister,"  and  treating  them  as  sisters  in  social  relationships.  It  is  then 
said  that  the  offspring  of  the  two  couples  would  not  be  potential  mates 
even  if  sib  affiliations  and  other  factors  were  favorable. 

If  two  women  who  are  close  friends  have  infant  sons  of  approxi- 
mately the  same  age  they  may  suckle  one  another's  child.  In  such  cases 


196  KIN    GROUPS   AND   KINSHIP 

the  children  are  treated  as  brothers  and  will  later  so  address  one 
another.  They  are  referred  to  as  "milk  brothers"  and  are  expected 
to  be  especially  close  and  mutually  attached,  much  as  would  real 
brothers.  Probably  the  sister  of  each  would  not  be  a  potential  mate 
for  the  other,  though  in  the  cases  recorded  they  were  ineligible  on 
other  grounds. 

Across  caste  lines  relationship  terms  are  also  used  in  address.  A 
blacksmith  in  Sirkanda  is  consistently  called  "uncle"  (mother's  brother, 
mama)  by  high-caste  people  younger  than  himself,  and  his  wife  is 
called  "aunt"  (father's  sister,  puphu).  To  address  a  stranger  as  mother's 
brother  would  be  an  insult  implying  that  one's  father  has  had  rela- 
tions with  the  stranger's  sister.  It  has  no  such  connotation  in  this  case, 
however.  The  blacksmith  addresses  younger  high-caste  women  as 
"niece"  (sister's  daughter,  bahanji).  He  addresses  high-caste  women  of 
his  own  age  as  "sister,"  and  they  sometimes  address  him  as  "brother," 
whereas  he  addresses  older  women  as  "father's  sister."  All  these  terms 
used  to  address  high-caste  women  are  terms  of  respect  and  honor  preclud- 
ing sexual  interest,  an  important  fact  for  low-caste  men's  relationship 
with  high-caste  women.  High-caste  men  are  usually  addressed  by  low- 
caste  people  in  honorific  terms,  usually  by  their  caste  title  (thakurjl, 
landlord;  panditjl,  priest). 

Terms  of  reference  across  caste  lines  are  never  kinship  terms.  Names, 
caste  names,  or  occupational  terms  are  used.  An  elderly  person,  regard- 
less of  caste  or  relationship,  is  likely  to  be  addressed  and  referred  to 
simply  as  "old  man"  or  "old  woman."  Descriptive  terms  are  frequently 
used  in  reference,  as  "black  man,"  "white  man,"  "fat  man,"  "tall  one," 
"crippled  one." 


. 


CASTE 


The  caste  system  has  probably  attracted  more  attention  from  soci- 
ologists and  anthropologists  than  has  any  other  feature  of  Indian 
society.  The  emphasis  is  not  unwarranted,  for  it  is  one  of  the  dominant 
social  and  cultural  facts  of  life  in  India.  In  this  chapter  caste  will  be 
described  as  it  functions  in  Sirkanda.  Some  of  the  differences  and 
similarities  of  the  Sirkanda  system  as  compared  to  other  examples 
that  have  been  reported  in  India  and  elsewhere  will  be  pointed  out. 

Caste  has  been  defined  variously  or  not  at  all  by  the  many  writers 
who  have  discussed  it.1  Many  have  been  concerned  exclusively  with 
India  and  have  therefore  dealt  with  caste  in  terms  so  specific  as  to 
apply  only  to  India,  the  area  of  their  interest  or  experience  (for  ex- 
ample, Gilbert,  1948,  pp.  31  f.,  and  Leach,  i960).  Such  narrow  defini- 
tions are  useful  because  caste  in  India  is  unique  and  has  distinctive 
regional  variations.  The  same  is  true  of  religion,  family  organization, 
economy,  and  most  other  phases  of  life.  To  understand  these  things 
thoroughly  it  is  well  to  make  explicit  their  unique  characteristics. 
Srinivas  emphasizes  a  prominent  and  unique  aspect  of  caste  in  India 
when  he  says,  "The  concept  of  pollution  governs  relations  between 
different  castes.  This  concept  is  absolutely  fundamental  to  the  caste 
system  and  along  with  the  concepts  of  karma  and  dharma  it  contributes 
to  make  caste  the  unique  institution  it  is"  (Srinivas,  1952,  p.  28). 

However,  to  define  caste  in  terms  of  its  uniquely  Indian  attributes 
eliminates  or  at  least  diminishes  its  use  as   a  cross-culturally  com- 


1 98  CASTE 

parable  phenomenon  (Bailey,  1959;  Berreman,  1960a).  This  in  itself 
is  not  a  criticism.  Cultures  do  have  unique  traits.  I  prefer,  however, 
to  define  caste  more  broadly  in  order  to  include,  for  purposes  of  com- 
parison, similar  systems  of  social  stratification  which  occur  in  other 
cultures.  More  is  lost,  from  the  point  of  view  of  social  science  (though 
not,  perhaps,  from  that  of  Indology)  by  emphasizing  its  unique  aspects 
at  the  expense  of  comparability  than  is  gained  by  the  added  precision. 
The  definition  of  castes  which  will  be  followed  here  seems  to  be 
valid  both  in  India  and  elsewhere:  Castes  are  ranked  endogamous  divi- 
sions of  society  in  which  membership  is  hereditary  and  permanent.2 
Implicit  in  this  minimal  definition  are  additional  criteria:  castes  are 
recognized  as  groups  (i.e.,  they  are  usually  named);  they  are  in  some 
ways  interdependent;  barriers  to  free  social  intercourse  exist  between 
castes;  there  are  cultural  differences  between  castes;  there  are  differ- 
ential degrees  of  power  and  privilege  between  castes.  Associated  with 
caste  in  many  and  perhaps  all  instances  is  a  degree  of  occupational 
specialization.  While  all  the  members  of  a  caste  are  not  often  com- 
mitted to  one  line  of  work,  there  is  a  particular  occupation  or  range 
of  occupations  which  is  considered  to  be  appropriate  to  each  caste. 
Passin  (1955,  p.  41)  notes  that  among  the  "untouchable"  groups  of 
India,  Japan,  Korea,  and  Tibet,  ".  .  .  What  is  particularly  striking 
is  the  detailed  similarity  of  their  occupations.  In  principle,  they  were 
restricted  to  the  despised  and  menial  functions  of  the  community 
which  were,  however,  essential.  Someone  had  to  do  them."  Occu- 
pational specialization  may  be  evidenced  in  the  occupations  a  caste 
cannot  or  does  not  practice  as  well  as  in  those  it  does  practice.  In 
India  caste  groups  are  specifically  characterized  by  (1)  a  common 
traditional  occupation  and  /  or  a  claim  to  common  origin,  and  (2) 
a  ritual  status  which  must  be  maintained  and  which  can  be  defiled 
by  specified  types  of  behavior  and  contacts  with  other  groups. 

The  concepts  of  ritual  status  and  pollution,  as  mentioned  above  in 
the  quotation  from  Srinivas,  are  important  in  understanding  the  func- 
tioning of  caste  in  India.  Stevenson  specifies  that  ".  .  .  it  is  from 
ritual  rather  than  secular  status  and  from  group  rather  than  personal 
status,  that  the  caste  system  derives  it  unique  consistency  and  viability." 
"The  ritual  status  relationship  between  individuals  and  groups  and 
between  groups  of  different  categories  [castes]  rest  wholly  upon  be- 
havior-patterns linked  with  mystical  beliefs  in  general,  and  mainly 
upon  behavior  linked  with  a  particular  corpus  of  beliefs  concerning 
purity  and  pollution,  .  .  .  the  Hindu  Pollution  Concept"  (Stevenson, 
1954,  p.  46). 

Indian  caste  distinctions  are  explained  in  terms  of  elaborate  reli- 


CASTE  1 99 

gious,  mythological,  and  historical  rationalizations.  It  is  sometimes 
asserted  that  as  a  result  of  such  rationalizations  the  caste  system  is 
made  acceptable  to  all  those  who  are  included  within  it.  This  may 
be  true,  but  the  implication  that  therefore  all  who  are  included  within 
the  system  are  content  with  their  assigned  position  in  the  hierarchy 
either  as  individuals  or  as  groups  is  contradicted  by  the  present  re- 
search and  by  the  many  examples  of  caste-group  mobility  and  indi- 
vidual aspirations  of  low-caste  people  that  have  been  reported  (Berre- 
man,  1960a). 

In  India  castes  are  generally  divided  into  five  major  hierarchically 
ranked  groupings  or  levels.  The  top  four  of  these  are  the  four  varna 
or  categories  described  by  Manu,  the  Hindu  lawgiver,  comprising  the 
three  "twice-born"  groups  (Brahmins  or  priests,  Kshatriya  or  rulers 
and  warriors,  Vaishya  or  traders  and  farmers)  and  the  Shudra  artisans. 
At  the  bottom,  outside  the  varna  system,  are  the  untouchables.  This 
system  is  well  known  and  is  discussed  at  length  elsewhere  (cf.  Basham, 
1954,  pp.  137  ff.;  Dube,  1955,  pp.  34  ff.).  Also  well  known  is  the  division 
of  these  major  caste  levels  into  many  endogamous  regional  subgroups, 
called  jati  in  much  of  North  India,  the  "castes"  of  ordinary  parlance. 
The  many  details  of  ritual  and  other  barriers  restricting  social  relations 
between  castes  have  been  explained  at  length  by  other  authors  (cf. 
Srinivas,  1952,  pp.  24  ft.;  O'Malley,  1932,  pp.  1-31).  One  of  the  best 
concise  discussions  of  these  matters  is  that  of  Stevenson  (1954).  Recently 
attention  has  been  directed  toward  objective  and  precise  determina- 
tion of  caste  functions,  characteristics,  and  especially  relative  status 
or  ranking  of  castes  (cf.  Gough,  1959;  P.  M.  Mahar,  1959;  and  Marriott, 
1959,  i960).  It  is  unnecessary  to  go  further  into  these  matters  here. 

Caste  Functions 

Caste  (jat  or  jati)  is  the  ultimate  extension  of  the  kin  group.  Its 
members  are  considered  to  be  remotely  related  to  one  another,  and 
it  is  the  furthest  extent  of  potential  or  actual  affinal  kin  ties.  In  fact, 
the  geographical  and  social  limits  of  a  caste  may  be  defined  most 
satisfactorily  in  terms  of  the  marriage  network.  As  a  result,  caste 
functions  are  in  many  respects  similar  to  family,  sib,  clan,  and  kindred 
functions,  although  caste  is  a  less  intimate  group.  It  is  a  unit  of  social 
control  in  that  its  members  or  their  representatives  determine  col- 
lectively what  the  membership  may  and  may  not  do,  and  what  shall 
be  done  to  enforce  these  rules.  It  is  the  unit  of  ritual  and  social 
equality.  It  is  the  endogamous  unit,  the  commensal  unit,  the  unit 
within  which  there  are  no  ritual  prohibitions  on  contact  and  outside 


200  CASTE 

of  which  such  prohibitions  must,  theoretically,  be  observed.  It  is  an 
economic  unit  of  importance  in  that  it  tends  to  be  the  largest  com- 
petitive unit — the  largest  unit  whose  members  engage  in  the  same 
traditional  occupation.  Caste  is  an  important  reference  group  for  its 
members.  Matters  of  importance  to  individuals,  families,  sibs,  clans, 
and  kindreds  are  of  some  concern  to  the  caste  as  a  whole  and  are  likely 
to  engage  the  attention  of  caste-fellows.  Ritual  and  ceremonial  occa- 
sions reveal  this.  Cliques  and  factions  show  the  influence  of  caste 
boundaries.  People  interact  socially  and  ritually  with  their  caste-fel- 
lows more  often  than  with  members  of  other  castes. 

As  a  result,  caste  members  share  a  culture  which  differs  slightly 
from  that  of  other  castes.  Although  caste  cultures  vary  less  in  Sirkanda 
than  on  the  plains,  differences  do  become  apparent  in  matters  pertain- 
ing to  traditional  occupation,  to  social  organization,  to  caste  prefer- 
ences in  worship,  and  to  interaction  with  other  castes. 

Caste  in  the  Sub-Himalayan  Region 

There  has  been  no  systematic  study  of  Pahari  caste  organization. 
There  are,  however,  enough  references  to  the  population  and  customs 
of  the  Pahari  areas  to  give  a  general  picture  of  caste  structure  there 
and  to  verify  much  of  what  came  to  light  in  Sirkanda.  The  Pahari 
caste  system  is  similar  to  that  in  other  parts  of  India  and  is  well  within 
the  range  of  regional  variations. 

All  over  the  cis-Himalayan  region,  the  Simla  states,  the  Doon  valley,  Kulu 
and  Kangra  valleys  there  exists  a  hierarchy  of  social  status,  though  the  rigidity 
of  the  caste  system  as  in  the  plains  does  not  exist.  The  upper  class  consists 
of  Brahmins  and  Rajputs  (Kshatriyas)  .  .  .  the  lower  strata  is  composed  of 
innumerable  social  groups  who  form  the  artisan  elements  in  the  population 
of  these  parts.  .  .  .  These  suffer  from  a  number  of  disabilities  and  are  treated 
as  serfs  or  dependents  and  thus  provide  a  dual  organization  of  economic 
classes  in  these  hills.  (Majumdar,  1944,  pp.  137  f.) 

It  has  been  noted  before  that  the  component  castes  of  the  "upper 
class,"  the  Khasiyas,  are  not  separated  by  great  social  or  ritual  distance 
in  some  Pahari  areas  and  that,  in  fact,  intermarriage  between  them  is 
not  rare.  The  "lower  strata"  are  called  Doms,  a  term  which  applies  to 
all  the  artisan  castes  of  the  hills.  "The  Doms  .  .  .  are  as  far  as  can  be 
asserted  the  aborigines  of  the  country.  They  are  found  wherever  the 
Khasiyas  are  found,  living  with  them  in  a  state  even  now  not  far  re- 
moved from  serfdom"  (Walton,  1910,  p.  62).  Saksena  reports  that 
while  the  Brahmins  and  Rajputs  of  Jaunsar-Bawar  form  a  single  en- 
dogamous  group,  "each  group  among  the  Doms  constitutes  a  single 


CASTE  20 1 

endogamous  group,  arranged  in  hierarchical  order"  (Saksena,  1955, 
p.  28). 

There  can  be  no  doubt  that  we  are  dealing  with  a  caste  society. 
It  is  not  as  rigid,  perhaps,  as  that  found  on  the  plains,  but  the  bases 
for  status  evaluation  of  castes,  the  barriers  limiting  contacts  between 
them,  and  the  nature  of  interaction  among  them  are  in  general  similar 
to  those  characteristic  of  the  Hindu  caste  system  throughout  India.  It 
cannot  be  accurately  described  as  a  class  system,  as  Majumdar  wishes 
to  do,  because  legitimate  individual  mobility  within  the  system  is 
impossible. 

Most  writers  attest  to  the  physical  and  cultural  distinctiveness  of 
the  Doms  as  contrasted  to  the  high  castes  or  Khasas.  The  difference  is 
traced  to  their  alleged  separate  origins  as  early  aborigines  and  Indo- 
Aryan  invaders,  respectively.  These  views  have  been  discussed  at  some 
length  in  chapter  1.  Whatever  may  have  been  the  earlier  situation, 
it  is  evident  that  these  distinctions  now  exist  primarily  in  the  minds 
of  their  advocates  and  to  a  minor  extent  if  at  all  in  the  physical  and 
cultural  make-up  of  the  Paharis.  Today  Khasas  and  Doms  are  phys- 
ically virtually  indistinguishable  and  culturally  similar. 

There  is  a  homogeneous  social  code  to  which  both  the  higher  and  lower 
groups  subscribe.  The  disabilities  that  obtain  in  these  parts  among  the  lower 
castes  in  the  matter  of  dress,  food  and  drink,  in  the  restrictions  to  marriage 
and  inter-dining,  are  mostly  superficial,  and  they  have  not  affected  the  social 
relationships  to  any  appreciable  extent.  (Majumdar,  1944,  p.  139) 

Thus  Pahari  caste  stucture  is  characterized  by  a  twofold  division 
into  high-caste  groups  (Brahmin  and  Rajput  or  Khasiya)  and  low-caste 
artisan  groups  (Dom).  The  latter  are  accorded  the  status  of  untouch- 
ables and  include  most  of  the  occupational  groups  found  among  both 
the  clean  Shudras  and  the  untouchables  of  the  plains.  Within  each 
of  these  classifications  there  are  status  distinctions,  but  not  of  the  same 
order  as  that  of  the  main  division.  Even  intermarriage  is  tolerated 
between  castes  of  the  same  general  social  and  economic  level.  As  will 
be  made  clear  below,  the  high-low  or  pure-polluted  caste  dichotomy 
is  a  striking  feature  of  caste  structure  in  Sirkanda  as  distinguished  from 
the  multiple  divisions  of  the  plains.  On  the  other  hand,  this  is  not 
a  qualitative  difference — plains  people  too  distinguish  "clean"  castes 
(the  four  varnas)  from  untouchables,  and  "twice-born"  castes  (the  top 
three  varnas)  from  those  which  are  not  twice-born  (the  Shudras  and 
untouchables).  Cohn  (1954,  p.  116)  notes  that,  in  the  plains  village  he 
studied,  "it  would  appear  that,  although  the  caste  system  is  a  graduated 
hierarchical  one,  the  difference  between  the  Thakurs  and  all  the  others 


202  CASTE 

is  greater  than  any  differences  among  the  low-caste  people."  Bailey 
(1957,  p.  8)  emphasizes  the  importance  of  the  "line  of  pollution" 
between  untouchables  and  others  in  a  South  Indian  village.  Hocart 
(1950,  p.  4)  comments  on  the  distinction  in  Ceylon  between  the  three 
leading  castes  or  "good  people"  as  ".  .  .  opposed  to  the  'low-castes,' 
who  comprise  fishermen,  smiths,  washermen,  .  .  .  tailors,  potters, 
weavers.  .  .  ."  Marriott  (i960,  pp.  43  ff.)  cites  comparable  systems  of 
caste  status  ranking  in  the  middle  Indus  and  Bengal  delta  areas.  In 
much  of  South  India  Brahmins,  Shudras,  and  untouchables  are  the 
major  groupings. 

In  plains  villages  the  most  important  division  seems  to  be  at  least 
threefold  (twice-born,  Shudra,  untouchable)  if  not  fivefold  (Brahmin, 
Kshatriya,  Vaishya,  Shudra,  untouchable)  rather  than  twofold  as  in 
Sirkanda.  Also,  in  the  plains  there  is  evidently  greater  social  distance 
between  groups  which  would  in  Sirkanda  fall  within  the  high-  or  low- 
caste  divisions.  Another  difference  is  that  in  the  hill  area  there  are 
few  ranked  subcaste  divisions  such  as  those  characteristic  of  plains 
castes.  Among  the  indigenous  hill  castes  in  and  around  Bhatbair,  the 
subdivisions  (sib,  gotra)  are  of  equal  rank  and  purity.  The  only  excep- 
tion is  in  the  superior  ritual  purity  of  ceremonial  cooks  over  other 
Brahmins. 

The  range  of  castes  in  the  hills,  as  in  any  other  particular  locality 
in  India,  is  but  a  small  segment  of  the  total  of  endogamous  castes 
and  subcastes  found  in  India.  Ghurye  (1952,  p.  23)  estimates  that  at 
the  beginning  of  the  nineteenth  century  there  were  500  to  2,000  sub- 
castes  in  each  linguistic  area  of  India.  In  comparison  to  the  adjacent 
plains,  the  absolute  number  of  castes  in  the  Pahari  area  and  in  each 
Pahari  village  is  small.  For  Garhwal,  Raturi  (1928,  pp.  196  ff.)  lists 
Brahmins,  Rajputs,  and  30  untouchable  castes.  Bahadur  (1916,  pp. 
101  f.)  lists  15  "professional  castes"  belonging  to  the  Dom  group.  It  is 
probable  that  both  these  listings  of  artisans  include  occupational 
groups  which  cannot  accurately  be  described  as  castes  in  that  they  are 
not  endogamous,  but  the  pattern  of  two  high  castes  and  a  variety  of 
low,  ritually  impure  artisan  castes  of  roughly  comparable  status  is 
verified.  Conspicuous  by  their  absence  in  the  Pahari  region  are  in- 
digenous Vaishya  (members  of  the  merchant  caste)  and  Shudras  (clean, 
but  not  twice-born,  castes,  primarily  artisans). 

Caste  in  Sirkanda 

There  are  five  castes  represented   in   Sirkanda:    Brahmins   and 
Rajputs  in  the  twice-born,  Khasa  category,  and  blacksmiths,  Bajgis 


CASTE  203 

(drummers),  and  barbers  in  the  untouchable,  artisan  Dom  category. 
Although  the  barber  caste  is  not  an  indigenous  Pahari  caste,  the 
Sirkanda  barbers  were  brought  into  the  village  by  its  Brahmin 
founders  and  have  therefore  been  an  integral  part  of  Sirkanda  since 
it  has  existed  as  a  village.  Blacksmiths  are  the  most  recent  immigrant 
group,  having  come  about  90  years  ago.  One  Bajgi  man  settled  in 
Sirkanda  only  25  years  ago,  but  the  other  Bajgis  are  long-time  resi- 
dents. At  one  time  or  another,  in  the  past,  shoemakers  and  weavers 
have  lived  temporarily  in  or  near  the  village,  but,  like  the  Vaishya 
merchant  who  operates  one  of  the  village  shops,  they  were  never 
identified  by  themselves  or  others  as  villagers.  Within  a  half-day's 
walk  of  Sirkanda  are  a  few  other  service  groups  who  are  occasionally 
utilized  in  the  village,  notably  shoemakers,  weavers,  and  carpenters. 
Traditional  caste  occupations,  occupational  deviation,  and  the  role  of 
caste  in  the  local  economy  have  been  discussed  in  chapter  2. 

Caste  organization  in  this  area  is  extremely  loose  and  informal. 
There  are  no  organized  caste  governments  or  councils.  When  an  in- 
fraction of  caste  rules  occurs  in  a  high  caste,  a  group  of  male  high- 
caste  members  may  be  called  together  as  a  council  to  take  action.  If 
so,  they  discuss  the  case,  listen  to  any  evidence  or  pleas  that  are  to  be 
given,  and  come  to  a  decision.  They  may  fine  or  otherwise  punish  the 
offender  or,  in  extreme  cases,  ostracize  him  from  the  caste,  that  is, 
outcaste  him  by  refusing  to  let  him  take  further  part  in  caste  functions 
and  refusing  to  interact  socially  with  him.  The  only  remembered  occa- 
sions upon  which  such  councils  have  been  called  have  been  for  con- 
sideration of  breaches  of  rules  of  caste  endogamy.  Theoretically  they 
might  be  called  for  other  cases  of  disobedience  of  rules  of  ritual  purity. 
Often  no  meeting  is  called  and  the  offender  is  merely  ostracized  by 
informal  agreement. 

Generally  councils  are  made  up  of  Rajputs  and  Brahmins.  It  is 
thought  proper  by  both  Rajputs  and  Brahmins  to  invite  representa- 
tives of  both  castes  to  any  meeting  that  may  be  held  by  either  of  them 
because  they  are  interdependent  as  priests  and  protectors  and  there- 
fore have  common  interests. 

Members  of  low  castes  usually  try  to  settle  their  problems  informally 
among  the  individuals  or  kin  groups  involved.  This  course  is  most 
frequently  taken  as  numbers  are  too  small  to  make  a  caste  council 
feasible,  and  the  members  wish  to  attract  as  little  attention  and  inter- 
ference as  possible.  If  agreement  cannot  be  reached  on  that  level,  high- 
caste  people  will  intervene  whether  requested  to  do  so  or  not.  As  the 
masters  and  possessors  of  superior  judgment,  and  as  people  with  a  stake 
in  smooth  social  relations  and  docility  among  their  subordinates,  high 


204  CASTE 

castes  do  not  hesitate  to  assume  their  traditional  authoritarian, 
paternalistic  role  even  in  the  internal  affairs  of  low  castes.  Often  a 
meeting  to  decide  a  dispute  or  punish  a  misdemeanor  involving  only 
low-caste  people  will  be  made  up  entirely  of  Rajputs  and  Brahmins. 
It  may  even  be  called  by  the  high  castes  when  the  caste  involved  has 
no  intention  of  acting  in  the  matter.  Individual  low-caste  people  often 
turn  in  times  of  trouble  to  high-caste  patrons — usually  people  to  whom 
they  are  committed  by  employment — who  are  expected  to  intercede  on 
their  behalf.  The  dominance  of  high  castes  (in  this  area,  Rajputs)  is 
readily  apparent  in  such  matters,  as  they  can  control  the  behavior  not 
only  of  their  own  caste  members,  but  to  a  significant  extent  that  of 
other  castes  as  well. 

The  real  source  of  day-to-day  control  within  the  caste  is  social  pres- 
sure applied  informally,  but  often  relentlessly,  by  the  group. 

Caste  Identification 

Caste  identification  or  loyalty  is  prominent  despite  the  informality 
of  caste  organization.  It  is  to  be  expected  that  in  a  caste  society  in 
an  isolated  area  caste  identification  will  be  strong.  From  childhood 
the  individual  learns  that  only  among  caste-fellows  is  he  among  equals. 
He  hears  the  stereotypes  about  other  castes  and  sees  the  conventional 
behavior  between  castes.  He  is  taught  that  he  cannot  deviate  from 
caste  rules.  If  he  is  of  high  caste  he  gradually  learns  the  advantages 
which  accrue  to  him  as  a  result  of  his  position.  If  he  is  of  low  caste  he 
learns  of  his  dependent  status  and  the  sanctions  which  can  be  applied 
to  keep  him  in  his  place.  He  learns  that  to  leave  the  village  is  to  leave 
all  that  is  familiar,  all  that  provides  security.  Most  people  therefore 
come  to  accept  their  position,  though  not  necessarily  to  like  it.  Inter- 
caste  conflicts  are  frequent  enough,  and  rivalries  are  persistent  enough, 
that  other  castes  are  seen  as  rival  groups  in  many  contexts.  Sympathy 
for  caste-fellows  generally  overrides  local  loyalties.  In  the  interests 
of  village  harmony  or  personal  survival,  caste  loyalties  may  be  sup- 
pressed but  they  do  not  disappear.  Thus,  initial  inquiry  among  low- 
caste  people  invariably  brought  the  response  that  in  a  dispute  they 
would  side  with  their  high-caste  village-mates  against  aliens  regardless 
of  caste.  "Our  village  must  stand  together."  Later,  as  they  came  to  trust 
the  inquirer  they  stated  emphatically  that  their  sympathies  invariably 
lay  with  their  caste-fellows  regardless  of  village  affiliation.  A  blacksmith 
informant  said,  "If  there  were  a  dispute  between  a  blacksmith  of 
some  other  village  and  a  Sirkanda  Rajput  my  whole  sympathy  would 
be  with  the  blacksmith,  but  I  would  speak  out  for  the  Rajput,  if  I 
had  to  speak,  for  fear  of  the  punishment  of  Rajputs.  This  is  always 


CASTE  205 

the  case.  I  think  it  is  true  of  all  castes."  A  Bajgi  commented,  "If  there 
is  an  intercaste  dispute  involving  a  Bajgi  we  are  on  his  side  whether 
he  is  from  a  neighboring  village  or  from  Bombay.  If  they  knew  of  it, 
every  Bajgi  in  India  would  be  on  his  side." 

That  such  attitudes  do  not  seriously  affect  village  stability  is  largely 
attributable  to  the  concentration  of  numbers  and  power  in  the  high 
castes.  Organized  opposition  to  them  is  hopeless,  and  overriding  caste 
loyalties  among  low  castes  are  restricted  largely  to  private  attitudes. 

Caste  loyalties  appear  to  be  somewhat  less  strong  in  Rajput-Brahmin 
relations,  where  village  unity  or  in-caste  factions  often  override  inter- 
caste rivalry.  In  a  real  power  struggle,  however,  a  high-caste  man  can 
usually  count  on  the  support  of  his  caste-fellows,  or  demand  it. 

High  castes  frequently  intervene  or  support  one  side  or  the  other 
in  inter-low-caste  disputes.  Low  castes  try  to  avoid  involvement  in 
inter-high-caste  disputes  within  the  village  and  enter  into  such  dis- 
putes across  village  lines  only  at  the  urging  of  high-caste  villagers. 

The  status  identification  of  low-caste  people  is  recognized  by  all 
castes.  A  radio  program  devoted  to  "Harijan  uplift"  (untouchable 
uplift)  heard  on  the  anthropologist's  radio,  attracted  the  immediate 
attention  of  low-caste  people  and  was  the  subject  of  pointed  remarks 
and  jokes  by  high-caste  villagers.  "Well,  you  will  soon  be  a  big  man, 
Ram  Lai.  The  government  will  teach  you  to  read  and  make  you  a 
cabinet  minister."  Low-caste  people  are  expected  to  be  interested  in 
talk  of  their  position  and  government  efforts  to  improve  it,  but  not 
to  take  it  seriously.  They  are  watched  closely  by  high-caste  people,  and 
a  wrong  response  or  attitude  can  bring  abuse.  I  described  to  a  group  of 
Rajputs  the  visit  to  India  of  United  States  Congressman  Dr.  Singh 
Saund,  and  mentioned  that  he  was  of  Punjabi  Indian  origin  and, 
according  to  the  papers,  had  been  a  blacksmith.  My  listeners  shouted 
at  once  for  the  blacksmith,  who  was  working  in  his  shop.  The  story 
was  repeated  for  his  benefit,  and  all  expectantly  awaited  his  reaction. 
Having  been  put  on  the  spot,  he  mulled  the  idea  over  briefly  and  then 
said  evenly,  "I  want  to  go  to  America,"  and  returned  to  his  shop. 


Dominant  Caste 

A  study  of  the  locally  dominant  caste  and  the  kind  of  dominance  it  enjoys 
is  essential  to  the  understanding  of  rural  society  in  India.  Numerical  strength, 
economic  and  political  power,  ritual  status  and  Western  education  and  oc- 
cupations, are  the  most  important  elements  of  dominance.  Usually  the  differ- 
ent elements  of  dominance  are  distributed  among  different  castes  in  a  village. 
When  a  caste  enjoys  all  or  most  of  the  elements  of  dominance,  it  may  be  said 
to  have  decisive  dominance.  (Srinivas,  1959,  p.  15) 


206  CASTE 

Of  384  current  residents  of  Sirkanda,  90  per  cent  are  in  the  high 
castes  (87  per  cent  Rajputs,  3  per  cent  Brahmins)  and  10  per  cent 
are  in  the  low  castes  (5  per  cent  Bajgi,  3  per  cent  blacksmiths,  2  per 
cent  barbers).  Of  45  households  or  joint  families,  37  are  Rajputs,  one 
Brahmin,  two  blacksmith,  one  barber,  and  four  Bajgi.  Therefore 
Rajputs  are  numerically  the  dominant  caste  in  this  village. 

Rajputs  own  94  per  cent  of  the  arable  land  surrounding  Sirkanda, 
while  the  Brahmin  household  owns  another  4  per  cent,  leaving  but  2 
per  cent  for  the  low  castes.  Similarly  the  high  castes  own  97  per  cent 
of  the  cows,  buffaloes,  and  oxen,  all  the  horses  and  mules,  and  92  per 
cent  of  the  sheep  and  goats  of  Sirkanda.  Of  the  livestock,  the  Brahmin 
family  owns  its  proportional  share  as  a  larger-than-average  high-caste 
joint  family — about  4  per  cent.  A  Rajput  family  has  the  only  locally 
owned  and  operated  shop,  and  another  Rajput  family  owns  the  build- 
ing in  which  the  outside  merchant  keeps  his  shop.  Low-caste  income 
is  derived  primarily  from  high-caste  villagers  in  return  for  services 
as  artisans.  It  is  therefore  apparent  that  Rajputs  are  economically 
the  dominant  caste  in  Sirkanda. 

Formal  village  government  and  political  affiliation  count  for  little 
in  Sirkanda.  However,  of  the  eleven  Sirkanda  members  of  the  village 
council,  10  are  Rajputs  and  one  a  blacksmith  (by  law  one  seat  is 
reserved  for  low  castes).  The  president  and  vice  president  of  the  council, 
as  well  as  their  opponents  in  the  last  election  and  their  predecessors, 
all  are  Rajputs.  The  five  Sirkanda  members  of  more  inclusive  govern- 
ing bodies  (judicial  councils)  have  all  been  Rajputs,  including  the 
president  of  one  of  these  councils.  The  two  officers  of  the  Sirkanda 
credit  cooperative,  although  they  have  never  had  occasion  to  function, 
are  Rajputs.  In  the  past  various  official  and  semiofficial  offices  were 
given  to  appointed  villagers  by  the  British  for  administrative  pur- 
poses. One  of  these,  village  accountant,  was  held  by  a  Rajput;  another, 
village  tax  collector  (Lambarddr),  was  held  successively  by  two  Rajputs 
of  Sirkanda  and  before  that  by  a  Brahmin  of  a  neighboring  village.  The 
hereditary  title  of  Mukhia  (a  local  administrative  officer  supposed  to 
be  a  keeper  of  the  peace)  was  held  in  a  Rajput  family,  and  a  son-in-law 
of  that  family  retains  the  title  today. 

No  official  position  within  the  village,  except  the  recently  designated 
low  caste  seat  on  the  village  council,  has  been  held  by  other  than  a 
Rajput.  A  frequent  criticism  which  low-caste  people  voice  against 
the  village  council  is  that  it  is  dominated  by  Rajputs  and  therefore 
dispenses  "Rajput  justice."  A  blacksmith  commented: 

The  president  of  the  village  council  is  a  Rajput.  He  was  put  into  office 
by  Rajputs.  Even  if  he  wanted  to  be  fair  to  us  and  help  us  get  some  land 


CASTE  207 

to  till  he  could  not.  There  would  be  too  much  pressure  on  him  from  other 
Rajputs.  So  everything  he  does  is  for  the  benefit  of  Rajputs. 

Another  low-caste  man  said: 

They  run  the  village  to  their  own  advantage.  They  never  think  of  us.  They 
fine  us  if  we  bring  a  dispute  before  them  and  do  not  fine  Rajputs  in  the 
same  circumstances.  Then  they  use  our  money  for  their  enjoyment.  They 
prey  on  our  vulnerability. 

In  the  more  important  realm  of  traditional  leadership  and  power 
in  the  village,  Rajputs  play  the  dominant  role.  When  meetings  or 
councils  are  called  to  decide  disputes  or  infractions  of  rules  involving 
villagers,  those  called  are  high-caste  people,  so  that  Rajputs  are  always 
represented  and  dominate  even  though  their  caste-fellows  may  not 
be  involved  in  the  issue  at  hand.  They  combine  the  traditional  roles 
of  landowners,  rulers,  and  protectors  of  the  village,  and  so  they  are 
its  leaders. 

It  is  therefore  evident  that  Rajputs  are  politically  the  dominant 
caste  in  Sirkanda. 

Nontraditional  education  is  as  yet  not  a  powerful  influence  in 
Sirkanda.  The  village  school,  established  in  1950,  is  open  to,  and 
attended  by,  all  castes.  However,  of  the  twelve  villagers  who  went 
outside  Sirkanda  for  schooling  before  establishment  of  the  local  school 
or  for  higher  education  than  that  offered  in  the  village,  all  were 
Rajputs. 

Of  Sirkanda  villagers  only  three,  all  Rajputs,  have  been  in  military 
service.  Rajputs  have  no  monopoly  on  casual  outside  contacts  or 
temporary  sojourns  in  urban  or  non-Pahari  areas.  Members  of  all  castes 
have  had  such  experience,  and  low  castes,  in  particular,  travel — 
primarily  to  get  materials  for  their  crafts.  However,  such  travel  seems 
to  have  relatively  little  lasting  effect.  The  two  villagers  who  have 
moved  out  to  take  apparently  permanent  employment  in  urban  areas 
are  both  Rajputs.  On  the  whole,  then,  Rajputs  have  had  greater 
access  to  nontraditional  education  and  experience  than  have  other 
castes  in  Sirkanda. 

Ritually,  Rajputs  are  second  to  Brahmins  in  status,  but  the  differ- 
ence is  relatively  unimportant  in  this  area.  As  will  become  evident,  the 
difference  in  ritual  status  is  not  as  great  between  these  two  groups 
as  it  is  in  the  plains;  intermarriage  is  tolerated  (although  it  is  dis- 
approved and  occurs  infrequently),  and  a  high  degree  of  social  in- 
timacy is  practiced.  Moreover,  these  two  castes  are  far  above  the  other 
Pahari  castes  in  ritual  status. 

Thus  Rajputs  enjoy  nearly  all  the  elements  of  dominance  in  Sirkanda 


208  CASTE 

and  are  therefore  the  possessors  of  "decisive  dominance"  as  defined  by 
Srinivas.  In  Sirkanda,  as  throughout  the  hills,  Rajputs  and  Brahmins 
are  what  Mayer  (1958)  terms  "allied  castes"  in  that  they  act  together 
on  certain  occasions,  notably  in  relation  to  the  low  castes,  to  present 
a  united  front.  There  are  disputes  and  jealousies  between  the  two 
high  castes,  but  they  are  rarely  divided  in  their  relations  with  the 
low  castes,  to  whom  they  appear  as  a  single  dominant  group. 

In  some  villages  of  the  area  Brahmins  are  approximately  equal  in 
numbers  to  Rajputs,  and  in  a  few  they  outnumber  Rajputs.  I  would 
estimate  the  Brahmin  population  of  Bhatbair  and  vicinity  at  one- 
fourth  to  one-third  that  of  Rajputs.  According  to  the  census  of  1872, 
there  were  81,000  Brahmins  and  152,000  Rajputs  in  Garhwal  (Atkin- 
son, 1886,  p.  277;  see  also  table  4  below). 

TABLE  4 


Population  by  Caste 

Sirkanda 

Caste 

Sibs 

Lineages 

Households 

Individuals 

Number  Percentage 

.  ,    J  Brahmin 
lg     1  Rajput 

1 

4 

1 
11 

1 

37 

11                 3      ] 
335              87       i 

f  Blacksmith 
dw   J  Barber 
I  Bajgi 

Totals 

1 
1 

2 
9 

1 

1 

2 

16 

2 

1 

4 

45" 

12                3      I 

5                2 
21                5      J 
384             100 

90  % 


10% 


26  Villages  Which  Each  Supplied  at  Least  1%  of  Sirkanda  Mates* 

High-caste  individuals  4332     (93%) 

Low-caste  individuals  339     (  7%) 

Total  4671 

India  b 

Harijans  51,000,000     (13%) 

Others  333,000,000     (87%) 

Population  of  Garhwal,  1872  c 

Brahmins  81,000     (28%) 

Rajputs  152,000     (53%) 

Doms  52,000     (18%) 

a  Census  of  India,  1951. 

b  Planning  Commission  (1958),  p.  380. 

c  Atkinson  (1886),  p.  277. 

Relative  size  of  population  is  decisive   in  determining  which  of 
the  two  high  castes  will  exercise  practical  dominance  in  any  given 


CASTE  209 

village,  because  they  differ  little  in  the  other  criteria  of  dominance. 
The  importance  of  numbers  is  as  readily  apparent  to  villagers  as  it  is 
to  the  outside  observer.  Even  among  low  castes  a  frequent  rational- 
ization for  the  power  of  high-caste  villagers  is  in  terms  of  their  superior 
numbers.  A  blacksmith  described  the  discrimination  practiced  by 
Rajputs  in  the  village  against  his  own  caste,  and  then  commented, 
"The  reason  Rajputs  can  do  those  things  is  that  they  outnumber  us 
so  much.  If  blacksmiths  were  in  the  majority,  the  Rajputs  would  be 
untouchables."  He  also  recognized  the  importance  of  land  to  power: 

Because  of  our  skill  at  blacksmithing,  our  ancestors  spurned  land — they 
wanted  to  make  their  living  by  their  craft.  What  they  did  not  realize  was 
that  people  with  land  are  people  with  power.  So  now  we  blacksmiths  are 
suffering  the  consequences.  We  are  just  like  servants  now.  We  have  to  do 
what  the  landowners  tell  us  to  do.  Since  we  do  not  grow  our  own  food,  we 
must  come  begging  to  them  for  payment. 

Another  low-caste  man  explained: 

Caste  is  a  matter  of  wealth  and  numbers.  A  wealthy  untouchable  can  have 
the  District  Magistrate  and  others  to  his  house.  A  poor  untouchable  cannot 
even  draw  water  from  the  public  well.  In  this  village  there  are  many  Rajputs, 
so  they  can  tell  the  low  castes  where  to  sit.  If  the  numbers  were  reversed  they 
couldn't  do  this.  As  an  example,  there  are  few  shoemakers  and  sweepers 
[the  lowest  castes]  in  Dehra  Dun  and  they  are  poor.  They  are  not  allowed 
to  touch  anyone  of  higher  caste.  On  the  other  hand,  before  partition  there 
were  many  Muslims  in  Dehra  Dun  and  many  of  them  were  well-to-do.  The 
Muslims  were  fed  and  entertained  in  the  homes  of  high-caste  Hindus  and 
vice  versa.  A  Muslim  kills  the  sacred  cow  and  eats  its  flesh,  while  a  shoemaker 
merely  removes  the  hide  of  a  dead  cow  and  with  it  makes  shoes  for  people 
— a  necessary  service.  But  Muslims  were  numerous  and  wealthy,  so  in  spite 
of  their  defiling  practices  they  were  treated  well.  Shoemakers  are  few  and 
poor,  so  they  must  suffer  as  untouchables.  Such  is  the  nature  of  caste. 

Although  Rajputs  are  the  dominant  caste  they  are  dependent  upon 
other  castes  in  and  around  Sirkanda  for  economic  and  religious  serv- 
ices, as  discussed  in  previous  chapters.  Before  we  proceed  to  an  examina- 
tion of  intercaste  relationships  in  these  and  other  contexts,  it  will  be 
well  to  consider  the  important  matter  of  relative  ranking  of  castes. 

Caste  Ranking  in  Sirkanda 

Determination  of  the  relative  rank  of  castes  is  not  as  easy  as  it 
might  at  first  appear.  To  simply  ask  a  person  may  or  may  not  produce 
a  coherent  account  of  rank  order.  To  ask  several  people  is  most  likely 
to  produce  several  rank  orders. 


2  1 0  CASTE 

Individuals  and  even  groups  may  be  given  one  rank  order  in  a  particular 
context  and  a  different  ranking  in  another  context.  .  .  .  What  is  quite  con- 
stant is  a  set  of  criteria  for  ranking;  what  varies  is  the  interpretation  given 
in  a  specific  instance  to  a  particular  combination  of  characteristics.  (Mandel- 
baum,  1955,  p.  241) 

Recently  a  good  deal  of  attention  has  been  directed  toward  this 
problem.  Among  the  most  interesting  studies  has  been  Pauline  Mahar's 
use  of  a  multiple  scaling  technique  to  get  at  caste  ranking  from  the 
point  of  view  of  ritual  purity  and  pollution  by  investigating  the  "norms 
relevant  to  the  interactions  symbolizing  inequality  of  ritual  status  in 
dyadic  inter-caste  relations"  (P.  M.  Mahar,  1959,  p.  128).  Through 
this  technique  she  was  able  to  show  quite  precisely  the  relative  ranks 
of  18  of  22  castes  in  Kalapur  and  to  specify  areas  of  disagreement  in 
caste  ranking. 

In  Sirkanda  the  situation  was  less  complex  than  that  with  which 
Mahar  and  most  other  researchers  have  worked  in  Indian  villages,  in 
that  a  relatively  small  number  of  castes  were  to  be  dealt  with.  The 
pattern  of  intercaste  relationships  was,  however,  essentially  the  same 
as  that  found  by  other  researchers.  In  view  of  the  limited  number  of 
informants  and  castes,  I  was  able  to  question  extensively  on  this 
subject  and  to  derive  a  fairly  consistent  body  of  data.  In  analyzing 
these  data  I  compared  a  range  of  statements  of  what  should  be  done 
and  what  is  done  with  the  observations  and  reports  of  actual  inter- 
action among  members  of  the  various  castes.  As  a  result,  I  obtained  a 
quite  complete  picture  of  caste  as  it  functions  in  the  village  and  as 
it  is  seen  from  the  various  caste  levels. 

In  the  research  an  attempt  was  made  to  pay  equal  attention  to 
"ritual"  and  "secular"  criteria  of  caste  ranking.  It  soon  became  evident 
that  "secular  status"  is  significant  to  caste  ranking  primarily  as  it  is 
reflected  in  "ritual  status,"  but  not  in  and  of  itself.  The  two  cannot  be 
separated.  Traditional  occupation,  which  is  an  important  factor  in 
caste  status  and  might  be  assumed  to  be  a  secular  consideration,  is  in 
fact  not  secular.  Inherent  in  it  is  attribution  of  ritual  status.  That  is, 
occupation  is  accorded  ritual  significance.  A  shoemaker  or  blacksmith 
is,  by  the  nature  of  his  traditional  occupation,  ritually  impure.  If  a 
group  gives  up  or  adopts  a  ritually  impure  occupation,  its  ritual  status 
will  usually  vary  accordingly.  Thus  it  was  reported  that  some  Bajgis 
further  in  Garhwal  had,  in  the  absence  of  available  shoemakers  and 
at  the  insistence  of  high  castes,  adopted  the  occupation  of  skinning  and 
disposing  of  dead  animals.  They  had  thereupon  become  untouchable 
to  other  Bajgis.  On  the  other  hand,  a  group  of  Bedas  near  Bhatbair 
were  trying  to  raise  their  status  by  giving  up  their  traditional  occupa- 


1.  Sirkanda  village   and   neighboring  hills.   View   eastward   from    the   school 
(see  map  3). 


2.  Settlement  area  of  Sirkanda.  The  Brahmins'  house  in  the  foreground 
is  being  rebuilt  by  carpenter-masons  while  two  members  of  the  family  and 
two  elderly  Rajputs  watch. 


3.  The  respected  head  of  a 
prosperous  Rajput  household. 
He  wears  gold  earrings  to 
honor  a  household  deity. 


4.  Wife  and  mother  in  a  Rajput  household.  The  gold 
nose  ring  indicates  marriage;  the  heavy  silver  neck- 
lace was  given  at  her  engagement.  The  other  jewelry 
is  simply  for  "fashion." 


5.  Three  young  Rajput  girls 
and  a  little  boy.  The  eldest 
girl  is  approaching  marriage- 
able age. 


6.  These  boys,  like  men,  carry  loads  on  their  shoulders 
or  backs  rather  than  on  their  heads  as  women  do.  The 
boy  on  the  left  is  a  Bajgi;  the  other  two  are  Rajputs. 
They  show  physical  differences  which  fit  the  stereo- 
types of  their  castes. 


7.  Women  such  as  these  Rajputs  spend  considerable  time  every  day 
carrying  water  more  than  a  quarter  of  a  mile  from  the  village  spring  to 
their  homes. 


8.  Residents  of  two  good-sized  villages  farm  this  terraced  hillside.  One  of  the 
villages  is  discernible  in  the  lower  foreground;  the  other  is  near  the  crest  of 
the  hillside  on  the  right. 


9.  A  Rajput  harrows  his  plot  of  millet  on  a  large  terrace  early  in  the  rainy 
season. 


10.  Children  and  bullocks  here  perform  die  tedious  task  of  threshing  wheat. 


11.  Bringing  fodder  from  the  forest  is  a  year-round  job  for  women 
and  children.  This  Rajput  boy  is  bringing  dry  fodder  in  the  dry 
season. 


12.  Women  of  all  castes  devote  much  of  the  day  to  housekeeping.  This  Rajput 
woman  grinds  spices  as  she  watches  the  children. 


13.  The  barber  is  of  a  caste  alien  to  these  hills,  but  his  people  have  lived  in 
Sirkanda  since  its  founding  and  have  intermarried  with  Pahari  service  castes. 
Here  be  performs  his  traditional  duty  for  the  village  schoolteacher. 


14.  A  blacksmith  does  all  the  iron  work  for  his  clients  in  return  for  traditional 
payments  in  grain  at  each  harvest.  This  man  is  repairing  a  grass  knife. 


'A 


"J' WMkMittMi 


15.  This  Bajgi  earns  his  liv- 
ing by  making  baskets  to  or- 
der. His  relatives  are  farmers, 
musicians,  and  tailors,  and 
one   operates   an    illegal   still. 


8r»» 

2! 

*}| 

urn  r  h 

I II  I  !: 

•r" 

*»iii. 
Mi, 

N    II     ., 


-:^0 


16.  A  gala  wedding  party  (barat)  sets  out  for  the  bride's  village.  In  this  group 
the  musicians  and  palanquin  bearers  are  Bajgis  while  the  groom  and  guests 
are  Rajputs.  The  groom  will  walk  most  of  the  way  because  the  trail  is  rough 
and  the  way  is  long,  but  during  the  triumphal  exit  from  his  village  and  the 
entry  into  the  bride's  village  he  will  be  in  the  palanquin. 


17.  The  Brahmin  priest  (book  in  hand)  calls  for  a  recess  in  the 
night-long  wedding  ceremony.  It  is  being  performed  in  a  chart 
where  the  bride's  family  lives,  sharing  this  room  with  three  buffalo 
even  during  the  ceremony. 


18.  While  the  wedding 
ceremony  is  in  prog- 
ress, some  of  the  men 
amuse  themselves  by 
singing  and  dancing 
out-of-doors. 


19.  A  least  is  part  oi 
every  major  life-cycle 
rite.  Women  do  not 
travel  to  ceremonies 
but  local  women  eat 
together,  adjacent  to 
their  menfolk  and 
the   male  guests. 


m  Ml 


20.  The  annual  Pahari  fair  (taulft)  of  the  area  is  a  secular  event  that  is  greatly 
enjoyed,  much  as  are  weddings  and  the  religious  festival,  Diwali.  Here  gaily 
dressed  men  and  women  take  a  ride  on  a  Ferris  wheel. 


21.  A  Bajgi  woman  dances  while  possessed  by  a  household  god  whose  shrine 
is  visible  in  die  rear  wall.  The  pujaris  who  have  induced  die  god  to  dance 
sit  on  the  right.  The  female  victim  of  the  god's  wrath,  whose  illness  has  neces- 
sitated the  ceremony,  sits  behind  the  dancer. 


22.  A  Bajgi  diviner  analyzes  the 
troubles  of  a  Rajput  client.  In 
the  foreground  is  a  typical  wa- 
ter pipe. 


23.  Taking  milk  products  to 
market  to  sell  for  cash  or  credit 
is  a  regular  activity  of  young 
men  such  as  these  Rajputs.  These 
men's  ideas  of  stylish  dress  differ 
considerably.  The  one  on  the 
left  is  a  villager  with  little  ex- 
perience outside.  His  companion 
has  been  to  school  in  the  valley 
and  has  acquired  a  taste  for 
plains  styles. 


*^*i«£jfci~ 


24.  Occasionally  an  outside  merchant  brings  his  wares  to  Sirkanda.  Here  an 
itinerant  Tibetan  bangle  seller,  his  son,  and  his  employee  are  enjoying  a  lively 
market  for  their  sjoods. 


25.  The  school  is  a  recent  and  relatively  successful  source  of  governmental 
influence  in  Sirkanda.  Note  that  two  students  are  spinning  wool  thread  while 
reciting  their  lessons. 


26.  An  even  more  recent  outside  intrusion  is  All  India  Radio,  brought  to 
Sirkanda  for  the  first  time  via  the  anthropologist's  radio,  shown  here.  The 
listeners  on  the  cot  are  Rajputs,  the  others  are  Doms.  If  a  village  panchayat 
house  is  built,  a  free  radio  and  loudspeaker  will  be  provided  by  the  govern- 
ment. 


27.  These  members  of  the  older 
generation  of  Rajputs  look  back 
contentedlv  on  their  lives.  Thev 
have  four  obedient  sons  and  good 
land.  They  do  not  foresee  rapid 
or  unsettling  changes  in  the  vil- 
lage, but  diev  do  expect  voting 
men  to  take  advantage  of  new 
opportunities. 


28.  This  young  Rajput  is  considered  to  be  the  out- 
standing pupil  in  the  village  school.  From  a  pros- 
perous family,  he  expects  to  go  to  high  school  and 
perhaps  to  college.  As  a  fourth-grader,  he  is  the  first 
member  of  his  family  to  be  educated  beyond  the  first 
three  grades.  He  would  like  to  get  a  job  "in  service," 
that  is,  a  white-collar  job. 


CASTE  2  1 1 

tion  of  singing  and  dancing.  It  is  important  to  keep  in  mind  that  ritual 
status  is  a  group  phenomenon.  An  individual  cannot  raise  his  status 
by  changing  his  occupation,  and  he  is  unlikely  to  lower  it  in  this 
fashion  unless  he  is  ostracized  by  his  own  group.  The  discussion  in 
chapter  2  of  caste  occupations,  occupational  variation  within  castes, 
and  caste-neutral  occupations  is  relevant  in  this  context.  It  seems  likely 
that  occupational  variation  within  castes  is  more  acceptable  and  has 
wider  limits  here  than  in  the  plains. 

In  Sirkanda  the  details  of  caste  ranking  van'  with  the  status  level 
from  which  the  individual  views  his  fellow  villagers.  In  general, 
ritual  and  social  distance  (in  one  direction)  between  the  caste  of  an 
observer  and  two  castes  being  observed  varies  inversely  with  the 
perceived  ritual  and  social  distance  between  those  two  castes.  How- 
ever, pattern  of  ranking  is  remarkably  consistent.  In  the  discussion  of 
caste  ranking  below,  ideal  patterns  will  be  presented  first  and  there- 
after some  of  the  exceptions  and  deviations  will  be  mentioned. 

Ritually  purest  of  all  castes  are  the  Brahmins — traditionally  the 
priestly  caste.  Regardless  of  whether  or  not  individuals  follow  a 
priestly  occupation  they  are  accorded  their  traditional  ritual  primacy. 
Their  touch  or  presence  defiles  no  one.  All  castes  will  take  water  and 
boiled  (kachcha)  food  from  them.3  One  group  of  Brahmins  is  ritually 
even  purer  than  other  Brahmins.  They  are  the  ceremonial  cooks  (cf. 
p.  67)  who  accept  kachcha  food  from  no  one  but  their  own  subcaste- 
fellows.  Brahmins  in  general  take  kachcha  food  from  no  other  caste, 
will  let  no  other  caste  enter  their  cooking  and  eating  area,  and  when 
smoking  the  water  pipe  will  share  the  wooden  pipestem  with  no  other 
caste. 

Rajputs  are  a  close  second  to  Brahmins  in  ritual  status.  They  are 
approximately  as  far  from  other  castes  in  ritual  distance  as  are 
Brahmins  but  are  slightly  inferior  to  Brahmins.  Brahmins  will  not 
accept  kachcha  food  from  them,  share  the  wooden  pipestem  with  them, 
nor  let  them  eat  in  a  Brahmin  kitchen.  When  a  Rajput  eats  in  a 
Brahmin  house  he  rinses  the  utensils  he  has  used  and  leaves  them  out- 
side where  they  can  be  cleaned  before  being  used  again  in  the  Brahmin 
household.  Rajputs  and  Brahmins  do,  however,  freely  share  the  brass 
pipestem  or,  lacking  this,  the  brass  base  of  the  water  pipe,  and  ciga- 
rettes. In  most  situations  they  interact  as  equals. 

The  Brahmins  and  Rajputs  are  the  two  "twice-born,"  ritually  clean 
castes.  From  their  point  of  view  all  other  castes  are  achut  (literally  "un- 
touchable") or  defiling  and  are  referred  to  as  Dom.  Distinctions  among 
Doms  are  known  but  irrelevant  to  these  high-castes.  They  will  accept 
from  Doms  no  drink  except  liquor  and  no  cooked  food  except  parched 


2  1  2  CASTE 

grain,  and  potatoes  or  meat  roasted  directly  on  the  coals  of  a  fire.  Doms 
must  not  touch  the  water  pots  or  other  utensils  of  high-caste  people. 
If  they  do,  the  contents  are  discarded  and  the  utensil,  if  it  is  brass 
(as  is  usual),  is  cleaned.  If  it  is  of  the  alloy  known  as  kansi,  which 
absorbs  pollution  easily,  it  cannot  be  cleaned  and  must  be  discarded. 
Bodily  untouchability  is  not  observed — it  is  not  polluting  for  a  high- 
caste  person  to  be  touched  by  a  Dom.  Cohn  found  the  same  to  be  true 
in  Senapur.  "When  a  Thakur  uses  the  term  achut  in  reference  to  a 
Camar  he  does  not  mean  that  he  cannot  touch  or  be  touched  by  him, 
but  rather  that  he  cannot  take  water  or  food  from  him  and  that  the 
Camar's  touch  of  utensils  or  of  cooked  food  is  defiling"  (Cohn,  1954, 
p.  120). 

Doms  are  not  supposed  to  sit  on  the  same  string  cot  with  high- 
caste  people  or,  in  fact,  on  a  string  cot  at  all  in  the  presence  of  high- 
caste  people.  Doms  are  not  allowed  to  enter  or  sit  in  the  houses  of 
high  castes.  When  visiting  high-caste  homes  Doms  are  expected  to  sit 
on  the  narrow  porch  outside  the  house  or  on  the  steps  leading  up  to 
the  house.  On  the  other  hand,  high-caste  individuals  can  enter  freely 
into  the  homes  of  low-caste  people  and  are  given  the  seat  of  honor 
when  they  do  so.  Doms  cannot  share  either  the  pipestem  or  the  base 
of  the  water  pipe  with  high-caste  people.  When  smoking  in  a  group 
they  are  given  only  the  clay  pipe  bowl  to  smoke.  They  are  not  allowed 
to  share  cigarettes  with  high-caste  people.  They  cannot  worship  in 
the  Raghunath  temple  or  the  larger  temples  outside  the  village.  When 
being  blessed  by  a  Brahmin  they  are  not  touched  by  him.  Instead  he 
throws  a  small  amount  of  vermilion  substance  onto  a  convenient 
surface  and  a  Dom  applies  it  to  the  foreheads  of  his  caste-fellows. 
Sexual  contacts  between  Dom  men  and  high-caste  women  are  taboo. 

When  a  Dom  and  a  high-caste  person  meet  one  another,  the  Dom 
is  expected  to  bow  or  nod  and  respectfully  address  the  high-caste  person 
with  the  traditional  Pahari  greeting,  "Samarii  Thakur"  (greetings, 
landlord).4  This  is  an  enforceable  rule. 

There  is  thus  a  great  social  and  ritual  barrier  between  Rajputs  and 
Brahmins,  on  the  one  hand,  and  Doms  on  the  other.  Strengthening 
the  barrier,  in  the  minds  of  villagers,  is  the  traditional  occupation 
associated  with  each  caste.  Brahmins  are  traditionally  priests  and  Raj- 
puts are  traditionally  administrators  and  warriors,  but  both  are  thought 
of,  in  the  present  context,  primarily  as  landowning  agriculturists. 
The  high  castes  are  also  thought  to  be  ultimately  related  in  that  sons 
of  the  great  ascetics  became  Brahmins  and  Rajputs  depending  upon 
their  choice  of  occupation.  On  the  other  hand,  Doms  are  identified 
as  artisans — people  who  work  with  their  hands.  A  word  which  is  some- 


CASTE  2  1 3 

times  used  in  reference  to  Doms,  and  which  carries  the  same  connota- 
tions of  pollution  and  inferiority  implied  in  that  term,  is  shilpkar, 
artisan.  In  this  category  fall  the  craftsmen  and  specialists  who  would 
be  classified  as  Shudras  and  untouchables  on  the  plains.  The  same  sorts 
of  disabilities  are  imposed  upon  them  as  upon  untouchables  of  the 
plains. 

The  Doms  of  Sirkanda  are  blacksmiths,  barbers,  and  Bajgis.  Car- 
penters, weavers,  and  shoemakers  will  be  included  in  this  discussion, 
since  these  groups  are  continually  in  contact  with  Sirkanda  villagers 
and  are  residents  of  the  area.  Mention  will  also  be  made  of  Bedas  (the 
rope  sliders  and  musicians  described  in  previous  chapters),  who  are 
indigenous  to  the  area  and  are  still  in  occasional  contact  with  Sirkanda. 
All  these  groups  are  lumped  together  under  the  term  "Dom"  by  high- 
caste  villagers,  who  often  assert  that  "Doms  are  all  alike."  A  blacksmith 
remarked,  "They  [high  castes]  treat  all  low  castes  alike.  We  are  just 
Doms  to  them  even  though  there  are  great  differences  among  low 
castes."  5  High-caste  people  know  the  distinctions  among  low  castes 
but  consider  them  unimportant  and  irrelevant,  as  indeed  they  are  to 
high-caste  people.  All  low  castes  are  considered  by  them  to  be  approxi- 
mately equally  polluting. 

Blacksmiths  and  carpenters  actually  form  one  endogamous  group, 
although  there  is  a  strong  tendency  for  males  of  the  families  to  remain 
in  one  or  the  other  occupational  specialty.  There  are  no  formal  ritual 
distinctions  between  them,  and  for  most  purposes  they  can  be  con- 
sidered a  single  caste.  Dom  goldsmiths  also  fall  in  this  group.  These 
three  occupational  specialties  are  collectively  and  exclusively  termed 
Mistri.  This  group  and  barbers  and  weavers  are  roughly  equivalent 
in  status  and  consistently  rank  above  other  Dom  castes  in  the  ritual 
hierarchy  among  Doms.  The  barbers,  being  of  alien  origin,  have  been 
in  a  somewhat  anomalous  position.  They  share  a  common  marriage 
pool  with  Mistris,  although  both  barbers  and  Mistris  claim  ritual 
superiority  and  often  will  not  allow  one  another  in  their  kitchens. 
Weavers  are  generally  considered  to  be  slightly  lower  in  status  than 
Mistris  and  they,  on  their  part,  claim  to  be  higher.  Both  observe 
ritual  distance  in  that  they  do  not  normally  go  into  one  another's 
kitchens.  Intermarriage  is  allowed  but  is  not  encouraged  and  is  in- 
frequent. Weavers  are  in  nearly  all  respects  equivalent  in  status  to 
the  Sirkanda  barbers  and,  like  Mistris,  intermarry  freely  with  them. 
Thus,  the  barbers  form  a  link  between  Mistris  and  weavers.  This 
entire  group  is  of  nearly  equivalent  status,  so  that  a  rigid  hierarchy 
cannot  be  outlined.  All  claim  to  be  highest;  all  claim  to  be  polluted 
by  others  in  the  group;  all  occasionally  intermarry. 


214  CASTE 

Below  the  above-listed  group  of  artisan  castes  are  the  Bajgis, 
musicians  who  are  also  tailors  and  basket  weavers  and  in  this  area 
usually  perform  the  functions  of  barber  (although  Mistris,  too,  may 
perform  these  duties).  Restrictions  placed  upon  Bajgis  in  their  relation- 
ships with  Mistris  are,  according  to  the  latter,  the  same  as  those 
Rajputs  place  on  all  Doms.  In  practice,  however,  the  restrictions  are 
not  as  far-reaching  or  carefully  observed  as  those  between  Doms  and 
Rajputs.  Bajgis  frequently  challenge  the  superiority  of  Mistris,  but 
if  forced  to  a  showdown  will  concede  it.  Roughly  equivalent  in  rank 
to  Bajgis  are  other  musician  castes  such  as  Beda.  The  most  defiling 
characteristic  of  these  people  is  apparently  their  occupation  as  musi- 
cians and  dancers,  with  the  assumed  correlate  that  their  women  are 
prostitutes.  This  interpretation  is  based  both  upon  observation  of 
caste  ranking  and  upon  local  explanations,  which  usually  include  men- 
tion not  only  of  the  occupation  of  Bajgi  men  but  also  their  women's 
role  as  prostitutes.  To  explain  the  significance  of  this  in  terms  of  the 
pollution  concept,  we  might  turn  to  an  interesting  point  made  by 
Stevenson,  who  distinguishes  between  "external  pollution"  and  "in- 
ternal pollution,"  the  latter  being  much  more  defiling  and  difficult  to 
counteract  (Stevenson,  1954,  p.  52).  Stevenson  points  out  that  bodily 
emissions  are  ritually  polluting  to  Hindus.  He  speculates  that  this 
may  explain  the  fact  (true  also  in  Sirkanda)  that  intercaste  sexual 
congress  is  much  more  serious  for  a  woman  than  for  a  man.  A  lower- 
caste  partner  defiles  a  woman  permanently  and  irreparably  but  affects 
a  man  only  slightly.  Stevenson  hypothesizes  that,  ".  .  .  since  in  sexual 
intercourse  it  is  the  man  who  emits  the  polluting  secretion,  and  the 
woman  who  receives  it  internally,  the  man  is  exposed  only  to  external 
pollution,  which  can  be  removed  by  a  bath,  whereas  the  woman  is 
internally  polluted  [so  that  she  cannot  be  purified]  .  .  ."  (Stevenson, 
1954,  p.  57).  Perhaps  the  low  ritual  status  of  the  musician  castes  might 
be  accounted  for  by  interpreting  the  sexual  availability  and  assumed 
prostitution  of  their  women  in  these  terms — their  women  are  con- 
tinually and  irreparably  polluted  by  sexual  contacts  with  members  of 
many  castes.  More  simply,  they  are  occupationally  associated  with 
human  emissions  which  are  polluting,  and  therefore  they  are  polluted. 
Bajgi  women  in  Sirkanda  have  given  up  dancing,  and  the  Beda  women 
in  this  area  dance  less  than  formerly  in  an  effort  to  overcome  this 
stigma. 

Lowest  among  the  Dom  castes  are  the  shoemakers  and  skinners  of 
dead  animals  (Mochis,  Chamars).  They  are  often  musicians  as  well. 
These  people  are  treated  by  Bajgis  and  all  higher  castes  much  as 
Doms  in  general  are  treated  by  Rajputs  and  Brahmins.  They  are  the 


CASTE  215 

scapegoats  for  Bajgis,  who  are  the  scapegoats  for  Mistris,  just  as  all 
Doms  are  scapegoats  for  higher  castes.  Mochis  and  Chamars  are  con- 
sistently ranked  lower  by  all  castes  than  other  Doms  and  are  reportedly 
even  more  restricted  in  their  contacts  with  high  castes.  Their  rank 
is  apparently  due  primarily  to  their  uniquely  defiling  occupation.  It 
is  often  asserted  or  suspected  by  others  that  they  occasionally  eat  not 
only  dead  buffaloes,  but  even  dead  cows  or  oxen.  Their  alien  origin 
and  persistent  cultural  and  residential  separateness  in  the  area  prob- 
ably contribute  to  the  great  social  distance  between  them  and  other 
castes.  Much  of  what  Bhatbair  people  "know"  about  them  is  rumor. 
This  added  factor  makes  assessment  of  their  caste  status  relative  to 
other  Doms  especially  difficult.  While  they  are  definitely  the  lowest  of 
the  low  castes,  it  is  difficult  to  determine  to  what  extent  high-caste 
attitudes  toward  them  differ  from  those  toward  indigenous  Doms  in 
terms  of  pollution,  and  to  what  extent  cultural  factors  are  accountable. 

Among  low  castes,  then,  there  are  three  hierarchically  ranked  en- 
dogamous  groups  whose  ritual  status  is  linked  to  their  traditional 
occupational  specialties:  all  are  artisans  and  therefore,  by  Pahari  stand- 
ards, polluted.  On  this  basis  alone  the  clean  castes  treat  them  as  a  group 
and  largely  ignore  their  differences.  Among  artisans  the  purest  are 
those  who  practice  only  a  craft  (metalwork,  woodworking,  weaving, 
barbering),  whose  women  are  not  suspected  of  prostitution,  and  who 
do  not  handle  dead  animals.  Inferior  to  them  are  those  castes  who, 
in  addition  to  whatever  other  occupation  they  may  follow,  are  mu- 
sicians and  whose  women  are  dancers  and  therefore  suspected  of  prosti- 
tution. Lowest  of  all  are  those  whose  work  is  with  dead  animals.  There 
is  a  consistent  progression  of  pollution:  All  low  castes  are  artisans, 
those  who  are  also  musicians  are  lower  than  those  who  are  not,  and 
those  who  also  deal  with  dead  animals  are  lower  than  those  who  do 
not  (see  table  5).6 

The  details  of  this  hierarchy  differ  from  those  reported  by  Atkinson 
for  Garhwal  and  Kumaon.  Speaking  of  the  Doms  of  this  area  he  says: 

According  to  popular  estimation,  they  are  divided  into  four  grades,  all 
equally  impure  and  outside  ordinary  caste  life,  but  furnishing  certain  dis- 
tinctions from  occupation  and  the  like  which  bring  up  the  first  grade  very 
close  to  the  lower  forms  of  Rajput  clans  and  these  again  connect  with 
Brahmans,  so  that  no  link  in  the  chain  of  social  distinction  between  the 
highest  and  the  lowest  is  wanting.  (Atkinson,  1886,  p.  444) 

Atkinson  then  lists  the  four  grades  or  status  levels  of  Doms,  start- 
ing at  the  top,  as:  (1)  smiths,  carpenter-masons,  weavers,  and  "Khasiyas 
degraded   for   caste   offences";    (2)    basketmakers,   wood    turners,    oil 


2l6  CASTE 

pressers,  messengers,  miners;  (3)  leather  workers;  (4)  "vagrant  tribes  of 
musicians,  dancers,  jugglers,  acrobats,  etc."  The  differences  between 
that  account  and  the  situation  in  Bhatbair  are  that  the  second  category 
is  missing  in  Bhatbair,  since  wood  turners  are  categorized  with  other 
carpenters,  and  basket  makers  are  musicians.  The  castes  which  approx- 
imate the  third  and  fourth  are  reversed  in  status  level.  Perhaps  the 
facts  that  leather  workers  are  not  indigenous  to  the  Bhatbair  area 
and  that  in  Garhwal  and  Kumaon  their  women  are  not  thought  of 
as  prostitutes  account  for  the  reversal  of  their  status. 

TABLE  5 
Caste  Ranking  in  Sirkanda 

Brahmins 
1      '  Rajputs 


Blacksmith-carpenters 
(Mistris) 


Barbers,  weavers 


Bajgis  Bedas 


I   4    J    Shoemakers 

1.  Clean  castes  (twice-born) — landowning  agriculturists. 

2.  Unclean  castes  (achut) — artisans. 

3.  Castes  in  which  men  play  musical  instruments  and  women  dance. 

4.  Castes  that  handle  dead  animals  and/or  scavenge. 

In  this  schematic  representation,  a  solid  line  indicates  strongly  enforced 
prohibition  of  intermarriage;  the  broken  line  indicates  ideal  prohibition  of 
marriage  but  rare  toleration  of  it;  the  dotted  line  indicates  some  claims  to 
ritual  distance,  including  marriage  restrictions,  but  little  distance  in  fact. 
Those  caste  names  which  appear  on  the  same  horizontal  plane  are  of  approxi- 
mately equal  status. 

In  general,  a  caste's  members  may  freely  engage  in  any  activity 
less  defiling  than  that  appropriate  to  their  caste  status  or  irrelevant 
to  caste  status,  but  not  in  anything  more  defiling.  Caste  terminology 
is  instructive  in  this  context.  Mention  has  already  been  made  of  the 
use  of  the  traditional  Pahari  greeting  as  indicating  relative  status, 
and  that  clean  castes  refer  to  all  the  lower  castes  as  "Doms"  and  con- 
sider them  "achut."  Among  low  castes  the  term  Dom  is  resented  and 
is  applied  only  to  castes  lower  than  one's  own.  Blacksmiths  refer  to 
Bajgis  and  shoemakers  as  Doms  but  deny  that  the  term  is  properly 
applied  to  themselves.  Bajgis,  in  turn,  apply  the  term  only  to  shoe- 
makers,  and  shoemakers  resent  the  appellation,  preferring  a  more 


CASTE  2  1 7 

specific  caste  term.  The  government  listed  all  these  low-caste  groups 
as  "scheduled  castes"  in  the  1951  census.  The  census  taker  who  came 
to  Sirkanda  termed  them  Harijans,  Gandhi's  term  for  untouchables — 
literally  "children  of  god."  As  one  Bajgi  said,  "In  the  census  they 
listed  all  who  are  not  Brahmins  or  Rajputs  as  Harijans.  Of  course  that 
is  absurd.  There  aren't  any  shoemakers  or  sweepers  in  this  village, 
and  they  are  the  only  real  Harijans."  Low-caste  people  resent  general 
terms  which  lump  them  with  other  low  castes.  They  prefer  specific 
occupational  terms.  Some  low-caste  groups  have  alternative  terms  of 
reference  which  they  prefer  to  the  usual  one.  Thus  Bajgis  often  refer 
to  themselves  as  Darzi  or  Auji  (tailor).  Shoemakers  are  often  called 
Chamar  by  other  castes,  but  prefer  to  be  called  "shoemaker." 

Class  Differences 

Within  castes  there  are  differential  advantages  and  status  based 
in  part  on  wealth.  In  general,  as  has  been  shown  previously,  high- 
caste  villagers  control  the  wealth  of  Sirkanda.  Wealth  correlates 
positively  with  caste  but  is  not  rigidly  bound  to  it.  Although  great 
differences  in  land  ownership  and  income  do  not  exist  among  high- 
caste  families,  this  does  not  mean  that  no  differences  are  found.  Some 
families  are  in  debt;  others  have  money  to  lend.  Some  are  financially 
better  off  than  they  were  a  few  years  or  generations  ago;  others  have 
less  than  formerly.  Changes  in  fortune  are  a  prime  topic  of  gossip 
in  the  village.  One  Rajput  family  came  into  a  large  and  unexpected 
sum  of  money  obtained  by  dubious  means  from  Muslims  at  the  time 
of  India's  partition.  They  now  possess  the  best  house  in  Sirkanda, 
display  their  wealth,  and  affect  airs  of  superiority — behavior  which  is 
repulsive  to  the  entire  village.  Villagers  commented  that  they  are 
little  people  who  got  too  much  money  and  do  not  know  how  to  live 
with  it.  "A  big  person  is  unchanged  by  a  change  in  fortune;  a  small 
person  is  overcome  with  it.  Money  is  like  a  rainstorm  which  affects 
the  ocean  hardly  at  all,  but  makes  a  mountain  stream  into  a  raging 
torrent  that  tries  to  carry  away  the  mountain  with  it." 

Low  castes  are,  on  the  whole,  much  less  secure  financially  than  are 
the  high  castes.  However,  there  are  differences  among  them.  At  present 
the  blacksmiths  and  the  two  small  Bajgi  households  are  the  poorest 
villagers.  They  have  no  land  to  cultivate,  they  own  few  animals,  and 
their  traditional  income  is  scanty.  The  barber  and  the  two  larger 
Bajgi  families  are  better  off.  They  have  animals  and  some  culti- 
vable land  in  addition  to  income  from  their  traditional  occupations. 
They  are  almost  as  well  off  as  the  poorer  Rajputs.  The  shoemakers  of 


2  1 8  CASTE 

this  area  are  as  well  off  as  the  Bajgis.  They  too  own  land  and  have 
a  sizable  traditional  income.  Several  artisans  of  the  Mistri  group  who 
live  in  areas  adjacent  to  Sirkanda  have  become  very  well-to-do,  and 
live  in  a  manner  superior  to  that  of  Sirkanda  Rajputs. 

Thus,  while  "class"  differences  are  correlated  with  caste  status, 
there  are  exceptions  and  there  is  differential  wealth  within  castes. 
Such  deviations  and  differences  do  not  affect  caste  status  (that  is,  ritual 
purity),  but  they  are  relevant  to  individual  status,  standard  of  living, 
and  to  interpersonal  and  intercaste  relations.  Blacksmith-Bajgi  rivalry 
in  Sirkanda  is  based  partly  upon  the  disparity  between  their  tradi- 
tional ritual  status  and  their  present  relative  economic  status  (cf.  Rowe, 
1960a,  pp.  70  ff.).  According  to  reports,  blacksmiths  were  formerly 
relatively  well  off,  and  friction  between  them  and  the  Bajgis  was 
minimal.  Sirkanda  Brahmins  hold  their  own  in  the  village,  despite 
their  small  numbers,  largely  because  their  wealth  backs  up  their 
ritual  status. 

Low  castes  hesitate  to  press  for  their  rights  partly  because  of  their 
economic  inferiority  to,  and  dependence  upon,  high  castes.  A  black- 
smith said,  "We  cannot  press  charges  against  a  Rajput.  He  and  his 
caste-fellows  would  pay  bribes  and  hire  lawyers  such  as  we  could 
never  afford.  Twenty  Rajputs  could  raise  Rs.  100  by  collecting  Rs.  5 
each.  What  could  two  poor  blacksmiths  do  against  that?"  A  Bajgi 
does  not  hesitate  to  press  charges  against  a  blacksmith  because  he 
knows  he  can  bring  at  least  as  much  money  (and  therefore  influence), 
to  bear  as  can  the  blacksmith. 

Although  there  are  well-known  differences  in  income  within  the 
village,  display  of  wealth  is  tightly  controlled  by  custom.  To  display 
wealth  in  disapproved  or  unconventional  ways  is  to  invite  public 
criticism,  social  pressure,  and  even  open  hostility,  as  has  the  newly 
rich  Rajput  family  mentioned  above.  This  is  true  at  all  caste  levels 
but  especially  at  the  lower  levels,  where  it  would  be  considered  not 
only  bad  taste  but  arrogance.  The  objection  is  not  to  living  beyond 
one's  means,  but  to  living  beyond  the  approved  level  of  expenditure, 
which  is  considerably  below  the  means  of  a  number  of  families. 

Wealth  is  legitimately  displayed  among  high-caste  villagers  in  ex- 
pensive weddings  and,  to  a  lesser  extent,  in  funerals  and  other  cere- 
monies, and  in  the  giving  of  charity  to  Brahmins.  This  ritualistic 
sphere  is  really  the  only  one  in  which  "conspicuous  consumption"  is 
practiced  without  disapproval.  A  family's  wealth  is  shown  in  other 
ways:  in  the  jewelry  worn  on  special  occasions  by  its  women;  in  large, 
well-built  houses  (here  the  number  of  ornately  carved  pillars  on  the 
veranda  is  a  publicly  recognized  criterion  of  wealth,  as  is  the  type 


CASTE  2  1 9 

of  roof,  thatch  being  least  expensive,  corrugated  iron  next,  and  slate 
most  expensive);  in  the  number  and  quality  of  cattle  owned;  in  the 
number  and  quality  of  household  utensils  (brass  trays,  tumblers,  and 
so  on)  used;  and  in  the  quality  of  food  served  in  the  house.  Educa- 
tion of  a  son  outside  the  village  is  coming  to  indicate  wealth,  but 
its  absence  is  not  a  sign  of  lack  of  wealth.  Wealth  cannot  be  legit- 
imately displayed  by  low-caste  members  in  the  village.  Any  display 
would  bring  prompt  and  painful  sanctions. 

For  the  most  part,  however,  wealth  is  not  displayed  even  by  high 
castes.  Instead,  money  is  stored  in  concealment  or  loaned  on  interest. 
Clothing,  household  furnishings,  and  most  other  material  possessions, 
as  well  as  the  work  and  other  activities  of  well-to-do  families,  are 
not  significantly  different  from  those  of  poor  people.  Wealth  is  usually 
apparent  more  in  spite  of  its  owner's  wishes  than  because  of  them. 
There  is  an  effort  at  nonconspicuous  consumption,  or  perhaps  more 
accurately,  conspicuous  nonconsumption. 

The  Wisers  have  explained  an  important  reason  for  villagers'  reluc- 
tance to  advertise  their  wealth — the  fear  of  exploitation  by  agents  of 
authority,  fear  of  increased  taxes,  and  so  on — by  paraphrasing  village 
sentiment  in  these  terms: 

In  self-protection  we  have  learned  to  make  it  almost  impossible  for  anyone 
to  tell  who  is  prospering  among  us.  You  may  guess,  and  we  may  guess.  But 
who  is  going  to  tell  us  if  we  are  right.  .  .  .  Some  among  us  are  honestly  poor. 
And  the  rest  of  us,  excepting  the  affirmed  leaders,  have  learned  to  make  a 
show  of  poverty.  (C.  V.  and  W.  H.  Wiser,  1951,  p.  159) 

The  wealthiest  man  in  Sirkanda  shows  his  wealth  in  no  perceptible 
way  except  in  the  very  favorable  marriages  (with  educated  boys  of 
prominent,  well-to-do  families)  that  he  has  contracted  for  his  daughters. 
Quality  of  marriage  arrangements  in  the  family  is  the  ultimate  crite- 
rion of  wealth  and  status  within  the  caste. 

The  most  important  factor  in  "class"  or  status  within  the  caste 
besides  wealth  and  the  things  correlated  with  it,  is  Sanskritization.  The 
more  a  family  conforms  to  Sanskritic  orthodoxy  in  life-cycle  cere- 
monies, the  more  highly  it  is  thought  of.  This  is  not  wholly  inde- 
pendent of  wealth,  as  Sanskritization  is  expensive,  but  it  is  a  somewhat 
different  dimension. 


Caste  Stereotypes 

Associated  with  conventional  criteria  of  caste  ranking  in  terms 
of  ritual  status  are  a  number  of  caste  stereotypes.  Rajputs  are  said 


220  CASTE 

by  low-caste  informants  to  be  proud,  haughty,  jealous  of  their  power, 
authoritarian.  Brahmins  are  supposed  to  be  niggardly  with  their  own 
property  and  exacting  in  their  demands  for  charity  and  service  from 
others.  "A  Brahmin  is  never  satisfied,"  is  a  frequent  saying.  Low-caste 
people  are  considered  by  high-caste  informants  to  be  lazy,  impulsive, 
thoughtless,  ignorant,  irresponsible,  childlike,  addicted  to  music,  drink, 
and  narcotics.  Low  castes  are  capable  of  taking  advantage  of  these 
stereotypes  by  using  them  as  excuses  for  behavior  that  would  other- 
wise be  inexcusable.  If  a  Bajgi  is  found  holding  a  drunken  songfest 
in  his  home  or  is  away  from  the  village  pursuing  an  illicit  love 
affair  while  he  is  supposed  to  be  preparing  a  set  of  clothes  for  a  Rajput 
client,  he  will  be  cursed  but,  after  all,  "what  can  be  expected  of  such 
people?" 

Low  castes  hold  particular  stereotypes  about  one  another  which 
are  shared  to  varying  degrees  by  high  castes.  Blacksmiths  are  con- 
sidered physically  powerful,  Bajgis  are  considered  hard-working  and 
clever,  and  the  barber  (whose  functions  are  elsewhere  performed  by 
Bajgis)  is  also  considered  clever.  Shoemakers  are  considered  degraded 
in  every  respect.  (Cf.  Oakley,  1905,  pp.  260  ff.) 

Stereotypes  tend  to  justify  the  system  and  perpetuate  it.  The  mem- 
bers of  various  castes  are  often  said  to  be  suited  to  that  caste  and 
no  other  by  their  very  nature.  To  give  advantages  to  low  castes  would 
be  useless,  as  they  would  not  be  able  to  make  use  of  them.  "Maggots 
which  live  in  feces  cannot  live  in  grain."  On  the  other  hand,  in  Sirkanda 
as  elsewhere,  this  philosophy  is  not  put  to  the  test  by  making  ad- 
vantages accessible  to  low  castes.  Rather,  low  castes  are  actively  denied 
access  to  advantages  which  high  castes  assert  they  could  not  use  or 
would  not  want  anyway. 

Attitudes  About  Caste 

Individual  attitudes  on  caste  are  shaped  from  earliest  childhood 
by  observation  of  behavior  of  elders  and  by  direct  instruction  or 
admonition.  A  blacksmith  discussed  his  own  feeling  toward  Bajgis  in 
response  to  a  query  following  up  apparent  inconsistencies  between  his 
behavior  and  his  statements  about  caste.  He  had  condemned  caste 
discrimination  while  stoutly  denying  that  he  would  treat  a  lower-caste 
person  as  he  wished  to  be  treated  by  Rajputs. 

I  don't  mingle  with  Bajgis  any  more  than  Rajputs  mingle  with  blacksmiths. 
In  my  heart  I  cannot  bring  myself  to  do  it.  My  conscience  will  not  let  me. 
I  have  been  taught  all  my  life  that  they  are  inferior  and  unclean.  Even  if 
I  wanted  to,  I  could  not  overcome  this  feeling.  Secondly,  it  is  due  to  the 


CASTE  221 

character  of  their  women  who  become  dancers  and  prostitutes — and  the  men 
play  drums.  Such  people  cannot  be  my  equals.  Finally,  there  is  pressure  from 
other  people  in  my  caste  and  the  knowledge  of  what  higher  castes  would 
think.  If  I  mixed  with  Bajgis  the  high  castes  would  treat  me  just  like  a 
Bajgi,  and  it  would  degrade  my  whole  caste.  High  castes  would  expect  the 
same  behavior  from  blacksmith  women  as  from  Bajgi  women.  My  own  caste 
members  would  be  angry  with  me. 

This  particular  informant  made  all  the  following  statements  rep- 
resenting a  variety  of  different  views:  "The  high  castes  treat  all  low 
castes  alike,  even  shoemakers."  "Caste  is  an  undesirable  thing,  it  divides 
people  and  makes  for  conflict;  it  should  be  abolished."  "There  are 
really  only  two  castes  in  the  world,  men  and  women;  all  others  are 
artificial  and  unnecessary."  "I  don't  mix  with  Bajgis  and  shoemakers; 
I  treat  those  Doms  just  as  Rajputs  treat  low  castes." 

Low-caste  people's  resentment  of  their  own  caste  position  is  con- 
stantly evident.  Equally  evident  is  their  need  to  rationalize  their 
status  relative  to  others.  Their  thoughts  along  these  lines  vary  from 
individual  to  individual  and  from  time  to  time.  An  attitude  shared 
and  expressed  by  several  low-caste  villagers  was  stated  by  one:  "Eng- 
lishmen and  Muslims  are  untouchable  because  they  have  an  alien 
religion  and  they  eat  beef.  This  is  logical.  We  are  Hindus  and  we  do 
not  eat  beef,  yet  we  too  are  treated  as  untouchables.  This  is  not 
proper.  We  should  be  accorded  higher  status." 

A  blacksmith  explained,  "Long  ago  Bajgis  used  to  kill  and  eat 
cattle  and  buffaloes  and  that  is  why  they  are  untouchable.  Our  people 
never  did  that,  so  we  should  not  be  called  untouchable."  This  alleged 
inconsistency  in  occupation  and  status  is  usually  rationalized  in  terms 
of  high-caste  numerical  and  economic  dominance.  It  is  commonly 
also  explained  in  terms  of  mythology,  which  takes  away  some  of  the 
sting  of  the  negative  associations  of  low  status,  usually  by  providing 
respectable  ancestry  for  the  caste  and  explaining  its  decline  in  terms 
of  unfortunate  circumstances.  Atkinson  notes  that  in  Kumaon  "the 
Doms,  like  all  the  others,  claim  an  exalted  origin  and  say  that  they 
are  the  descendants  of  a  Brahman  named  Gorakhnath  and  were 
turned  out  of  caste  for  eating  forbidden  food"  (Atkinson,  1886,  p.  446). 
The  blacksmiths  and  Bajgis  of  Sirkanda  lay  claim  to  relatively  recent 
but  unrecognized  Rajput  and  Brahmin  ancestry,  respectively. 

Q.  What  is  your  caste? 

A.  We  are  Lohars  [blacksmiths].  Sometimes  we  are  called  Mistri. 
Q.  Are  you  Doms? 

A.  No,  Bajgis  and  shoemakers  are  Doms.  We  are  above  them.  We  cannot 
take  water  from  them. 


222  CASTE 

Q.  Someone  told  me  you  are  Mahar  Rajputs. 

A.  Oh  yes,  that  is  true,  but  people  here  don't  recognize  that.  We  are 
descended  from  a  Mahar  Rajput  who  lived  several  generations  ago  farther 
up  in  the  hills  and  who  took  a  blacksmith  wife.  Since  we  are  his  children 
we  are  of  his  caste,  but  people  here  call  us  blacksmiths.  There  are  other  such 
cases.  A  man  should  be  of  the  caste  of  his  father,  but  people  don't  recognize 
that  when  the  mother  is  of  low  caste. 

Similarly,  the  Chamars  of  Senapur  trace  their  ancestry  to  Rajputs 
or  Brahmins  (Cohn,  1954,  pp.  112  ff.). 

Besides  rationalizations  for  the  low  status  of  their  family  or  caste, 
people  almost  invariably  seek  rationalizations  for  individual  status; 
that  is,  in  addition  to  denying  that  his  caste  deserves  low  status  or 
has  always  been  of  low  status,  a  man  usually  denies  that,  granted  the 
low  status  of  his  caste,  he  is  deserving  of  having  been  accorded  such 
caste  affiliation  or  that  he  is  an  ordinary  low-caste  person.  The  attitude 
is,  "I  was  meant  for  greater  things."  There  are  many  stories  of  low- 
caste  individuals  who  were  destined  for  high  status  because  of  their 
good  works  in  previous  lives,  but  through  mischance  were  assigned 
to  life  in  a  low  caste.  The  same  people  who  adhere  to  claims  of  un- 
recognized higher  caste  status  believe  (in  apparent  contradiction)  that 
they  have  been  assigned  low  status  in  some  almost  accidental  way. 
Thus,  the  blacksmith  who  gave  the  above  responses  on  his  caste 
status  also  recounted  the  story  of  his  own  origin  as  it  had  been  told 
him  by  a  Brahmin  who  read  his  horoscope. 

The  pundit  read  my  horoscope  and  told  me  my  fate  and  my  history.  He 
is  always  right  in  these  matters.  He  said  that  in  my  previous  life  I  was  a 
wealthy  Raja.  I  was  well  known  for  my  valour,  honor,  and  piety,  and  the 
fairness  of  my  rule.  I  was  destined  for  a  very  high  rebirth.  One  time  I  de- 
cided to  give  away  a  great  deal  of  wealth  in  charity  to  my  Brahmins.  In  order 
to  do  this  I  had  my  servants  bake  a  great  many  pastries.  Instead  of  filling 
them  with  food,  I  instructed  my  attendants  and  servants  to  stuff  them  with 
gold  and  distribute  them  to  the  Brahmins.  This  was  done  secretly  and  was 
intended  as  a  surprise.  This  was  a  very  meritorious  act.  However,  my  assist- 
ants and  servants  were  dishonest,  and  instead  of  doing  as  I  had  instructed 
they  stole  the  gold  and  filled  the  pastries  with  stones.  These  were  distributed 
and  I  was  unaware  of  the  deceit.  The  Brahmins  who  received  them  did  not 
tell  me  because  they  did  not  know  my  intent,  so  I  never  found  out.  Although 
my  intent  was  pure,  I  was  guilty  of  putting  trust  in  untrustworthy  assistants. 
Therefore,  when  I  died,  I  was  punished  by  being  born  a  blacksmith.  It  is 
my  fate  in  this  life  never  to  succeed  in  any  enterprise  and  never  to  acquire 
or  retain  wealth.  This  has  proved  true.  I  have  tried  several  schemes  to  get 
money  and  all  have  failed.  When  I  had  some  money  which  I  inherited  from 
my  father,  it  was  stolen  from  me  on  a  trip  into  Dehra  Dun.  The  only  way 


CASTE  2  23 

I  can  get  anything  out  o£  money  is  to  spend  it  at  once  before  I  lose  it,  and 
that  is  my  policy.  In  my  next  life  I  am  destined  to  be  a  merchant — perhaps 
I  will  do  better  then. 

A  Bajgi  from  another  village  had  a  comparable  tale.  He  had  been 
an  ascetic  destined  to  become  a  Raja  in  the  next  life.  While  meditating 
on  the  infinite,  he  had  ignored  the  plight  of  a  cow  entangled  in  the 
brush.  As  punishment  he  was  reincarnated  as  a  lowly  Dom. 

Such  stories  of  deserved  but  unintentionally  provoked  punishment 
apparently  account  for  many  instances  of  low  birth.  They  are  dis- 
seminated by  Brahmins  and  serve  as  a  means  of  rationalization  and 
comfort  for  low-caste  people.  As  such  they  are  effective  means  of 
control  for  the  high  castes.  Whether  or  to  what  extent  Brahmins  are 
conscious  of  the  usefulness  of  the  stories  I  did  not  find  out,  but  their 
effect  is  obvious.  As  will  become  evident,  the  high  castes  in  general 
and  the  Brahmins  in  particular  have  a  strong  vested  interest  in  the 
caste  system  and  therefore  in  keeping  the  low  castes  in  their  place 
and  relatively  content. 

No  informants  were  found  who  said,  in  effect,  "I  was  a  scoundrel 
in  a  previous  life  and  now  I  am  getting  my  just  desserts."  Neither 
was  any  caste  found  whose  members  said  in  effect:  "We  have  always 
done  defiling  work.  This  is  what  we  were  created  to  do  and  we  do  it. 
Therefore  we  are  untouchable."  These  (and  particularly  the  first) 
seem  to  be  psychologically  untenable  positions  for  individuals  to 
accept.  On  the  other  hand,  high  castes  readily  admitted  that  they 
were  receiving  the  deserved  rewards  of  exemplary  previous  lives. 

In  Sirkanda,  as  in  Hindu  society  generally,  there  appears  to  be  an 
inherent  contradiction  between  what  some  would  call  social  structure 
and  culture.  That  is,  according  to  the  concept  of  dharma  (here  definable 
as  inherent  duty),  every  member  of  every  caste  group  is  enjoined  to 
behave  according  to  the  hereditary  station  of  the  caste  in  the  hierarchy. 
This  is  an  explicit  injunction  against  social  mobility  in  the  context  of 
the  caste  system. 

At  the  same  time  there  is  upward  mobility  among  low  castes  in 
India.  Lipset  and  Bendix  have  asserted  that 

the  fact  that  there  is  constant  striving  for  upward  mobility  in  the  most  status- 
ridden  society  in  the  world,  adds  considerable  weight  to  the  hypothesis  derived 
from  Veblin,  according  to  which  a  system  of  stratification  is  a  fundamental 
source  of  mobility  motivation  in  and  of  itself.  Apparently,  there  are  impera- 
tives which  prompt  men  to  resist  and  reject  an  inferior  status  and  these 
imperatives  persist  regardless  of  the  way  in  which  any  given  society  has 
legitimated  inequality.  (Lipset  and  Bendix,  i960,  p.  63) 


224  CASTE 

If  this  statement  is  correct  then  a  dilemma  faces  the  low-caste  person 
who  according  to  his  religion  should  stay  in  his  place,  but  according 
to  this  "natural  law"  wants  to  rise. 

In  Sirkanda  and,  I  believe,  throughout  India,  this  dilemma  is  often 
neatly  resolved  by  exactly  the  mechanisms  described  above:  accept- 
ing cast  dharma  but  denying  that  one's  apparent  dharma  is  his  real 
dharma.  That  is,  the  individual  takes  the  position  that  a  person  should 
behave  according  to  his  caste  status  but  that  he  or  his  kin  group  or 
jati  is  not  really  of  the  caste  or  status  to  which  others  ascribe  him 
(or  them).  He  is  of  a  higher  caste.  He  aspires  to  live  as  a  member  of 
his  "true"  caste  in  order  to  fulfill  his  true  dharma.  Therefore  his 
mobility  aspirations  are  legitimized  and  even  made  imperative.  He 
rationalizes  his  own  mobility  aspirations  without  challenging  the 
system. 

The  over-all  pattern  is  one  of  high  castes  justifying  their  superior 
position  in  terms  of  myths  and  religio-philosophical  beliefs.  Subor- 
dinate castes  assert  their  superiority  to  some  castes  while  rationalizing 
their  inferiority  to  others,  and  their  consequent  mobility  aspirations, 
in  terms  of  unrecognized  but  deserved  higher  status  and  dharma  than 
that  accorded  them  by  society.7 

In  Sirkanda  expressed  resentment  about  caste  was  usually  put  in 
terms  of  the  way  it  affects  "me"  or  "my  family"  or  "my  caste."  It 
rarely  extended  to  other  groups.  Even  those  low-caste  individuals  most 
piously  opposed  to  upper-caste  abuses  were  likely  to  be  equally  abusive 
to  their  caste  inferiors.  No  group  admitted  to  being  lower  than  all 
others.  Even  shoemakers  would  point  to  sweepers  of  the  plains  or  to 
beef-eating  Muslims  or  Christians  as  being  lower  than  themselves. 

Thus,  objections  to  the  caste  system,  as  such,  were  not  common. 
Those  voiced  in  Sirkanda  were  isolated  references  apparently  derived 
from  the  opinions  of  a  previous  low-caste  schoolteacher  or  others  who 
had  had  experience  with  the  Arya  Samaj  (a  reform  movement),  or 
Gandhian  or  government  views  on  caste.  They  did  not  reflect  a  con- 
sistent objection  in  the  village  to  the  caste  system. 

This  is  a  feature  of  intercaste  relations  common  throughout  India. 
Gould  (1961a,  p.  946)  attributes  it  in  large  part  to  "repressed  hostility 
which  manifests  itself  not  in  the  form  of  rejecting  the  caste  system 
but  in  the  form  of  its  victims  trying  to  seize  control  of  it  and  thereby 
expiate  their  frustrations  on  the  same  battle  field  where  they  acquired 
them."  I  would  suggest  that  an  important  factor  is  simply  that  all 
castes  are  so  imbued  with  the  value  of  hierarchy  that  none  wants 
to  associate  with  those  it  considers  inferior.  Should  the  caste  system 
be  abolished,  the  opportunity  to  mingle  as  equals  with  superiors  would 


CASTE  225 

be  accompanied  by  the  necessity  to  mingle  as  equals  with  inferiors. 
The  latter  would  be  an  especially  distasteful  prospect  to  a  group 
whose  only  claim  to  status  is  a  tenuous  superiority  to  one  or  a  few 
degraded  groups.  To  seek  to  undermine  the  caste  system  would  be  to 
seek  the  end  of  one's  own  superiority  to  at  least  some  other  groups. 
To  seek  to  raise  the  status  of  one's  own  caste  within  the  system  gives, 
promise  of  superiority  to  more  groups.  The  former  would  put  any 
caste  in  an  ambivalent  position  relative  to  its  previous  status;  the 
latter  would  bring  clear-cut  advantage.  Above  all,  the  Indian  ethos 
is  not  one  of  equality  but  one  of  hierarchy,  of  which  caste  is  the 
epitome.  The  upwardly  mobile  Indian  peasant  seeks  superiority,  not 
equality. 

Individuals  who  are  the  objects  of  caste  discrimination  generally 
direct  their  resentment  not  at  the  intergroup  phenomenon  as  such, 
but  at  the  manifestation  of  it  which  affects  them  personally.  They 
resent  not  caste  discrimination,  but  discrimination  directed  against 
themselves.  One  of  the  persistent  problems  of  "Harijan  uplift"  in 
India  is  that,  once  untouchables  become  educated  and  can  break  away 
from  many  of  the  restrictions  and  disabilities  imposed  by  their  tradi- 
tional caste  identification,  they  tend  to  disassociate  themselves  from 
their  caste  fellows  and  (with  notable  exceptions)  contribute  nothing 
to  further  the  cause  which  was  at  least  part  of  the  reason  they  were 
given  scholarships  or  other  extra  advantages  which  made  possible 
their  rise  in  status.  The  former  schoolteacher  in  Sirkanda,  who  was  of 
blacksmith  caste,  had  been  popular  among  all  castes  in  the  village, 
but  was  accused  by  his  caste-fellows  of  having  curried  favor  among 
high  castes  and  others  to  his  own  advantage  while  ignoring  the  wel- 
fare of  his  own  caste.  This  pattern  is  not  surprising,  nor  is  it  unique 
to  the  hills  or  to  India.  It  occurs  in  intergroup  relations  everywhere. 
The  same  kinds  of  accusations  are  directed  toward  the  "emancipated 
Negro"  of  the  United  States. 

However,  the  pattern  seems  to  be  somewhat  more  acute  and  general 
in  India,  partly,  perhaps,  because  in  India  intergroup  relations  are 
largely  carried  out  on  such  an  intensely  personal,  individual  level. 

I  sometimes  discussed  the  status  of  whites,  Indians,  and  Negroes  in 
Africa  with  urban  people  of  Dehra  Dun.  There  was  great  indignation 
about  the  situation,  but  it  invariably  boiled  down  to  the  statement, 
"They  treat  Indians  just  like  Negroes  there — it  is  a  grave  injustice." 
Curiosity  about  American  race  relations  was  of  the  same  quality,  in 
essence:  "How  does  an  Indian  fare  in  America?  Like  a  white  [as  he 
deserves]  or  like  a  Negro?"  No  one  I  knew  was  disturbed  about  or 
interested   in   racial   or   national   discrimination   in   principle.    This 


226  CASTE 

attitude  reflects  the  pervasiveness  of  the  theme  of  hierarchy.  People 
assume  there  is  everywhere  a  hierarchy  in  social  relations  based  on 
inherited  status,  with  attendant  discrimination,  and  they  want  to  be 
sure  that  they  are  at  or  near  the  top. 


Changes  in  Caste 

Judging  by  testimony  of  informants  and  by  the  few  available 
accounts  of  Pahari  castes,  caste  organization  today  is  not  greatly 
different  from  what  it  was  50  or  150  years  ago.  It  seems  probable  that 
there  has  been  a  tendency  to  shift  from  a  more  consistently  dual 
division  of  the  society  into  low-  and  high-caste  groups  to  one  in 
which,  while  this  division  has  remained  paramount,  status  differences 
within  the  two  groups  have  become  increasingly  pronounced.  On  the 
other  hand,  this  may  reflect  a  high-caste  conception  of  the  earlier 
situation  (a  conception  to  which  the  high  castes  still  adhere)  as  com- 
pared to  a  more  realistic  appraisal  of  the  present  situation.  On  the 
high-caste  side  of  the  barrier,  it  seems  likely  that  in  earlier  days  (before 
increasing  outside  contact  and  "Sanskritization")  Rajput-Brahmin 
distinctness  was  less  emphasized.  Intermarriage  between  the  groups 
was  reportedly  more  frequent,  and  very  likely  other  ritual  barriers 
were  much  reduced. 

Doms  were  evidently  somewhat  less  differentiated  among  them- 
selves than  at  present.  Bajgis  claim  that  at  one  time  they  and  the 
Mistris  were  one  endogamous  group.  Under  the  Raja  of  Garhwal  and 
more  recently  in  nearby  Tehri  Garhwal,  Doms  of  all  subgroups  were 
legally  prohibited  from  owning  land  or  dwellings  outright.  They 
could  not  own  or  use  eating  utensils  of  a  particular  alloy.  They  were 
prohibited  from  wearing  gold  jewelry.  Today  one  still  finds  an  occa- 
sional old  Dom  woman  whose  marital  nose  ring  is  a  silver  replica  of 
the  gold  one  (now  worn  by  all  castes)  which  was  formerly  restricted, 
to  the  high  castes.  In  many  areas  Doms  were  prohibited  from  living 
within  the  village.  Thus,  they  were  treated  as  a  homogeneous  group 
by  the  high  castes,  and  the  scanty  evidence  available  suggests  that 
they  may  have  considered  themselves  more  nearly  as  a  single  group. 

Doms  claim  to  have  been  in  former  days  the  recipients  of  more 
paternalistic  concern  by  the  high  castes  than  at  present.  They  were 
given  land,  houses,  grain,  and  gratuities  by  the  high-caste  people  for 
whom  they  worked.  The  high  castes  interceded  on  their  behalf  and 
protected  their  interests  from  outsiders  when  necessary.  In  return  the 
high  castes  demanded  respect  and  obedience.  Physical  punishment  and 
economic  sanctions  were  used  by  high  castes  to  maintain  their  status. 


CASTE  227 

Now  high-caste  people  complain  that  the  low  castes  are  growing  dis- 
respectful and  independent.  According  to  high-caste  people,  the  low 
castes  no  longer  want  to  live  by  their  traditional  occupations.  Low- 
caste  people  complain  that  the  high  castes  no  longer  give  them 
gratuities  or  even  their  proper  pay,  that  high  castes  will  not  come  to 
their  aid  when  they  need  help.  Each  blames  the  other  for  having 
brought  about  the  changes. 

Among  low  castes  there  has  been  increased  rivalry.  Apparently  the 
situation  was  relatively  stable  shortly  before  Independence — or  at 
least  it  seems  to  informants  to  have  been  so  in  retrospect.  Then  the 
Bajgis,  who  had  rankled  under  the  growing  superiority  complex  of 
the  Mistris,  began  to  press  for  equality,  encouraged  by  rumors  of  the 
Congress  political  party's  platform  and  their  economic  superiority 
and  traditional  claims  of  former  equality.  This  has  irritated  the 
Mistris,  whose  status  position  is  shaky  at  best.  Now  each  group  claims 
superiority,  although  Bajgis  often  display  deference  behavior  and  are 
evidently  ready  to  settle  for  equality.  A  recent  council  case  resulted 
when  a  Bajgi's  sarcastic  greeting  of  "Samani  Thakur"  to  a  blacksmith 
was  accepted  and  acknowledged  by  the  blacksmith  as  though  it  had 
been  respectfully  offered.  The  Bajgi  lodged  a  complaint  at  the  urging 
of  high-caste  villagers.  In  typical  council  fashion  the  Bajgi  was  fined 
for  thus  greeting  a  low-caste  man;  the  blacksmith  was  fined  an  equal 
amount  for  accepting  the  greeting.  The  council  members,  all  high- 
caste  men  who  had  pressed  for  the  suit  in  the  first  place,  enjoyed  a 
liquor  party  from  the  proceeds — a  result  which  low-caste  people  not 
involved  in  the  case  claimed  was  predictable  and  planned  in  advance. 

In  general  the  trend  in  behavior  associated  with  caste  status  is  now 
toward  adoption  of  orthodox  Hindu  behavior  in  some  contexts.  As 
has  been  noted  in  previous  chapters,  the  trend  is  especially  evident 
in  life-cycle  and  annual  ceremonies.  In  other  spheres  of  life  the  trend 
is  limited  largely  to  concealing  unorthodox  practices  from  potentially 
critical  outsiders,  while  in  some  matters  there  is  little  or  no  self-con- 
sciousness about  such  practices.  Thus  sacrifice  of  buffaloes,  consump- 
tion of  buffalo  meat,  and  eating  of  carcasses  of  recently  dead  wild 
animals  found  in  the  jungle  are  carefully  guarded  secrets.  That  goats 
are  killed  purely  for  their  meat  is  also  denied.  Sexual  freedom  within 
the  caste  and  sharing  of  wives  among  brothers  are  concealed.  Cross- 
caste  and  polygynous  marriages  are  not  readily  admitted.  Liquor  and 
meat  consumption  are  admitted  with  little  concern,  but  excuses  are 
occasionally  offered.  Widow  remarriage  and  lack  of  seclusion  of  women 
cause  no  embarrassment  at  all.  There  is  surprisingly  little  caste  differ- 
ence in  attitudes  and  behavior  on  these  matters,  although  low  castes 


228  CASTE 

cannot  afford  to  carry  out  Sanskritic  rituals  to  the  extent  that  high 
castes  can.  They  are  somewhat  less  inhibited  about  their  non-San- 
skritic  behavior  than  are  the  high  castes,  who  have  a  greater  prestige 
stake  and  who  are  also  in  somewhat  closer  contact  with  educated 
Brahmins  and  other  advocates  of  Sanskritization.  When  high-caste 
Paharis  are  accused  of  behavior  proscribed  in  plains  Hinduism, 
especially  that  involving  ritual  purity,  they  often  deny  the  behavior 
themselves  and  attribute  it  to  low-caste  Paharis. 


INTERCASTE    RELATIONS 


Intercaste  relations,  as  practiced  and  enforced  in  Sirkanda,  differ 
significantly  from  ideal  norms.  Analysis  of  intercaste  behavior  as  it 
compares  to  the  normative  model  will  contribute  to  an  understanding 
of  the  dynamics  of  stability  and  change  in  the  caste  system.  The 
previous  chapter  dealt  primarily  with  caste  organization,  and  with 
attitudes  and  behavior  which  are  publicly  recognized.  The  discussion 
will  turn  now  to  the  nature  of  caste  and  the  conduct  of  intercaste 
relations  as  revealed  by  observation  of  behavior  to  which  caste  is 
relevant,  both  behavior  which  is  "relatively  easy  for  the  individual 
to  manipulate  at  will,"  and  that  "in  regard  to  which  he  seems  to  have 
little  concern  or  control"  (Goffman,  1959,  p.  7;  cf.  Berreman,  1962c). 
As  a  result,  the  functioning  of  the  system  will  be  made  more  com- 
prehensible. 

Relations  Among  High  Castes 

As  has  been  noted,  intermarriage  can  and  does  occur  between 
Rajputs  and  Brahmins  in  and  around  Sirkanda.  Although  such  mar- 
riages are  disapproved  and  are  never  arranged  as  initial  marriages, 
relatively  little  indignation  is  aroused  by  them  once  they  have  occurred. 
Brahmins  engage  in  considerable  informal  social  interaction  with  Raj- 
puts, as  is  inevitable  in  a  village  where  Brahmins  are  in  such  a  small 
minority.  This  is  also  the  case,  however,  in  nearby  villages  where 
the  two  castes  are  more  evenly  distributed.  They  can  be  seen  sharing 


23O  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

freely  even  the  wooden  pipestem,  although  this  is  verbally  denied. 
Brahmins  and  Rajputs  do  not  usually  distinguish  rank  by  deferential 
behavior,  seating  arrangements,  greetings,  or  the  like,  although  an 
honored  Brahmin  from  outside  may  receive  such  deference  from  Raj- 
puts. 

Extramarital  sex  relations  between  Brahmins  and  Rajputs  are 
treated  in  no  appreciably  different  light  than  those  within  each  of 
these  castes.  The  most  celebrated  beauty  of  the  Sirkanda  area  was 
a  Brahmin  girl  of  a  neighboring  village  who  was  sexually  available  to 
Rajputs  and  Brahmins  alike.  What  little  critical  gossip  circulated 
about  her  was  concerned  with  the  frequency  and  openness  of  her 
contacts,  not  their  intercaste  character.  In  fact,  her  reputation  and 
the  identity  of  several  of  her  lovers  (in  Sirkanda  all  were  Rajputs) 
were  revealed  to  me  some  time  before  I  learned  that  she  was  a  Brahmin. 
Her  family  voiced  no  objection,  and  even  her  husband  kept  quiet.  The 
analysis  given  by  villagers  was,  "He  can't  say  anything— if  he  did  she 
might  leave  him  and  then  he  would  have  nothing.  It  is  better  to  share 
something  good  than  to  lose  it  altogether." 

Relations  between  Rajputs  and  Brahmins  are  not  always  amicable, 
and  the  power  distribution  between  the  two  groups  often  comes  to 
light  when  conflict  arises.  In  Sirkanda  Rajput-Brahmin  relations  have 
been  somewhat  strained  because,  while  the  Brahmins  are  said  to  have 
been  the  founders  of  the  village  and  are  one  of  the  more  prosperous 
families,  they  are  far  outnumbered  not  only  as  a  caste  but  as  a  sib 
and  lineage,  so  that  they  are  outnumbered  in  interfamily  and  inter- 
sib  disputes  as  well  as  in  intercaste  ones.  A  dispute  over  ownership 
of  a  valuable  tree  on  the  border  between  Brahmin  property  and  a 
Rajput  family's  property  created  a  tense  situation  in  which  the  Rajput 
family  head  threatened  the  Brahmin  with  physical  punishment  if  he 
carried  out  his  stated  intent  to  cut  the  tree.  It  was  well  known  by  all 
that  the  Rajput  could  make  good  his  threat  with  the  help  of  sib- 
fellows  if  necessary.  Cooler  heads  prevailed  when  the  Brahmin  braved 
the  Rajput's  threat  and  felled  the  tree.  Had  there  not  been  Rajputs 
who  valued  peace  over  power,  the  Brahmin  would  probably  not  have 
dared  risk  such  action. 

A  further  irritant  in  relations  between  the  high  castes  is  that  the 
Rajputs  depend  upon  outside  Brahmins  for  most  of  their  ritual  needs 
but  expect  the  local  Brahmin  to  be  available  in  emergencies,  while 
at  the  same  time  they  disparage  his  capabilities  in  religious  matters. 
The  outside  Brahmin  is  respected  partly  because  he  restricts  his  prac- 
tice to  high  castes  and  partly  because  he  devotes  full  time  to  his 
religious  duties.  The  local  Brahmin  serves  the  low  castes  also  and 


INTERCASTE    RELATIONS  23  1 

spends  much  of  his  time  on  agriculture  because  he  does  not  get  enough 
high-caste  clients  to  make  a  living  by  his  traditional  occupation  alone. 
It  is  a  circular  situation  and  causes  resentment  on  both  sides.  More- 
over, as  a  result  of  daily  contact  and  competition,  it  is  evident  to 
villagers  that  the  local  Brahmin  is  a  very  ordinary  person  while  the 
alien  Brahmin  has  an  aura  of  purity,  wisdom,  and  infallibility  about 
him  which  is  perhaps  due  more  to  the  lack  of  intimate  contact  with 
these  Rajputs  than  to  any  inherent  priestly  superiority.  The  effect  of 
distance  is  confirmed  by  the  Sirkanda  Brahmin,  who  receives  more 
respect  in  alien  villages  than  in  his  own.  Any  religious  practitioner 
in  these  hills  would  confirm  the  adage  that  familiarity  breeds  con- 
tempt. Upreti  (1894,  p.  378)  quotes  a  Pahari  proverb  to  this  effect.  The 
relative  position  of  the  alien  Brahmin  is  suggested  not  only  by  his 
practice  in  Sirkanda  but  by  his  reception  there.  He  invariably  stays 
at  the  homes  of  Rajputs,  who  compete  for  the  honor,  rather  than 
at  that  of  his  Sirkanda  caste-fellows,  and  he  himself  speaks  disparag- 
ingly of  the  local  Brahmin's  abilities  and  merits. 

As  a  result,  the  Brahmin  family  of  Sirkanda  is  somewhat  isolated 
socially  from  Rajputs,  not  because  of  ritual  barriers,  but  because  of 
a  combination  of  circumstances  among  which  ritual  differences  are 
minor.  However,  Tula,  the  purohit  or  traditional  Brahmin  for 
Sirkanda,  participates  intimately  with  Rajputs  in  every  type  of  inter- 
action including  drinking  and  meat-eating  parties.  He  is  also  known 
as  a  great  ladies'  man.  Important  in  this  context  is  the  fact  that 
Tula  retains  his  position  by  tradition — he  will  not  lose  his  clientele 
because  of  his  behavior.  Moreover,  in  his  position  he  is  neither  re- 
quired nor  expected  to  have  special  knowledge  or  special  virtue.  The 
Sirkanda  Brahmin,  on  the  other  hand,  has  a  voluntary  clientele  and 
risks  losing  clients  or  failing  to  get  more  if  he  does  not  retain  what 
esteem  he  has  in  their  eyes.  Since  he  is  responsible  for  ceremonies,  he 
is  expected  to  know  more  than  other  people  and  perhaps  be  more 
pure  than  they — expectations  which  are  not  verified  in  daily  contact 
with  him  in  the  village.  Also,  the  charity  given  the  village  Brahmin 
can  as  meritoriously  be  given  to  any  other  Brahmin,  whereas  Tula 
receives  traditional  charity  which  must  go  to  him  or  his  family  regard- 
less of  circumstances.  As  a  Bajgi  said  of  the  local  Brahmin,  "He  works 
for  Rajputs  just  like  we  do;  he  can't  afford  to  displease  them." 

Therefore  the  local  Brahmin  is  sensitive  to  public  opinion.  He 
participated  little  in  Rajput  drinking  parties.  He  was  extremely  reluc- 
tant to  discuss  the  village  or  his  work  with  me  if  there  was  a  chance 
others  might  find  out,  for  fear  that  villagers  would  accuse  him  of 
divulging  secrets  and  would  bring  pressure  to  bear  upon  him.  Similar 


232  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

charges  were  frequently  made  against  other  villagers  and  were  usually 
ignored  or  dismissed,  but  the  Brahmin  was  especially  sensitive  to  them. 
He  was  ever  aware  of  his  minority  status,  his  vulnerability,  and  their 
implications  for  his  place  in  the  village  which  was,  after  all,  his  home. 

Relations  Among  Low  Castes 

Among  low  castes  there  is  also  considerable  deviation  from  stated 
norms.  Although  blacksmiths  and  carpenters  form  an  endogamous 
group,  it  is  not  uncommon  for  one  to  offer  the  other  only  the  bowl  of 
his  pipe,  not  the  stem,  just  as  though  there  were  a  great  difference  in 
status  between  the  two.  Weavers  and  barbers  keep  themselves  ritually 
separated  from  Mistris  in  some  contexts.  There  is  evidently  a  reciprocal 
feeling  of  superiority  among  all  these  groups.  On  the  other  hand,  mar- 
riage is  acceptable  among  them  and  inter-sex  contact  is  very  free.  More- 
over, unfriendly  rivalry  among  them  appears  to  be  at  a  minimum, 
partly  because  not  all  are  represented  in  the  village  and  so  they  do  not 
have  close  contact  with  one  another. 

In  contrast,  Bajgis  are  said  by  all  the  above-listed  low-caste  groups 
to  be  inferior  in  ritual  status.  This  is  made  explicit  in  a  number  of 
disabilities  imposed  on  Bajgis.  The  pipestem  is  never  shared  with 
them.  Restrictions  on  eating  and  drinking  are  observed  about  as 
carefully  as  those  across  the  high-low  caste  boundary.  Intermarriage  is 
denied,  and  no  cases  were  reported.  Bajgis  often  yield  the  seat  of 
honor  to  blacksmiths  in  the  presence  of  outsiders.  Bajgis  occasionally 
strike  back  by  proclaiming  their  own  superiority  and  imposing  the 
same  restrictions  upon  other  low  castes  which  those  castes  inflict  on 
Bajgis.  The  attitude  of  the  Bajgis  is,  "If  they  can  do  it  to  us,  we 
can  do  it  to  them  too."  The  Bajgis'  reaction  toward  the  other  groups 
is  often  one  of  resentment  that  people  of  approximately  their  own 
status  should  turn  against  them  and  affect  superiority.  In  the  presence 
of  outsiders,  or  even  of  some  high-status  villagers,  blacksmiths  assume 
an  air  of  superiority  which  is  not  characteristic  of  their  normal  rela- 
tionship with  Bajgis  and  which  is  therefore  irritating  to  the  latter. 
Relations  between  the  two  groups  are  not  helped  by  the  fact  that 
blacksmiths  are  less  prosperous  than  Bajgis  and  yet  claim  ritual  and 
social  superiority.  The  discrepancy  constantly  rankles  both  parties. 
Evidently  the  distance  between  them  is  neither  too  great  nor  too  little 
to  discourage  rivalry. 

Bajgis  consistently  claim  equality  even  when  not  claiming  superior- 
ity. In  reality  there  is  considerable  freedom  of  interaction  between 
these  groups  and  also  considerable  rivalry.  Sex  relations  are  frequent, 


INTERCASTE    RELATIONS  2 33 

with  Bajgi  women  being  more  openly  pursued  by  men  of  the  higher 
status  group  than  blacksmith  women  are  pursued  by  Bajgi  men.  Friend- 
ship is  common  across  this  line,  and  there  is  a  much  greater  air  of 
camaraderie  in  the  relations  between  men  of  these  groups  than  across 
the  high-low  caste  boundary.  Deference  behavior  is  not  practiced  be- 
tween these  groups,  although  both  claim  to  expect  it  of  the  other. 
Cigarettes  are  shared  freely,  quite  in  contrast  to  blacksmiths'  private 
assurances  that  this  is  not  done.  Despite  such  evidence  of  relatively 
close  relations,  Bajgis  recognize  that  their  claims  to  equality  are  un- 
likely to  be  recognized  and  they  get  small  comfort  from  knowledge 
that  the  government  of  India  supports  their  rights. 

Contacts  between  Mistris  and  Bajgis,  on  the  one  hand,  and  shoe- 
makers, on  the  other,  are  few.  The  former  groups  are  anxious  to 
disavow  any  equivalence  between  themselves  and  the  lowly  shoemakers. 
Geographical  and  cultural  distance  prevent  much  contact,  but  social 
and  ritual  considerations  would  probably  be  sufficient  in  themselves  to 
accomplish  the  same  thing.  Shoemakers  are  the  true  Doms  or  Harijans 
from  the  point  of  view  of  Bajgis,  though  high  castes  recognize  rela- 
tively little  status  difference  between  them.  With  regard  to  sex  con- 
tact and  social  interaction,  the  relationship  between  the  shoemakers 
and  the  Bajgis  is  comparable  to  that  between  Rajputs  and  Doms. 

Shoemakers  themselves  adjust  to  their  status  as  aliens  who  are  lowest 
of  the  low  by  keeping  away  from  other  people  to  a  considerable  extent. 
They  live  by  themselves,  and  thereby  avoid  many  of  the  discriminatory 
acts  directed  toward  their  caste.  They  retain  the  cultural  distinctive- 
ness derived  from  their  alien  origin  in  the  Kangra  Valley  area  far  to 
the  west.  They  cling  to  their  assertions  of  superiority  to  sweepers  of 
the  plains  and  to  non-Hindus. 

High-Low  Caste  Relations 

Relationships  between  high  and  low  castes  do  not  always  conform 
to  the  ideal  patterns  of  paternalistic  control  and  maintenance  of  ritual 
distance  by  the  high  castes.  The  most  conspicuous  deviations  are  the 
examples  of  intercaste  marriage  and  elopement  discussed  in  chapter  5. 
Although  instances  of  this  type  which  cross  the  high-low  caste  boundary 
are  widely  disapproved  and  result  in  dissolution  of  the  relationship 
or  ostracism  of  the  high-caste  member  (who  is  usually  the  man)  by 
his  caste-fellows,  the  fact  that  they  occur  is  significant.  Much  more 
common  than  marriage  or  elopement  are  instances  of  informal  liaisons 
and  sex  relations  between  high-  and  low-caste  individuals.  Most  often 
high-caste  men  take  advantage  of  the  vulnerability  and  traditional 


234  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

receptivity  of  low-caste  women.  Such  situations  attract  little  or  no 
attention  and,  in  fact,  are  routine.  They  become  the  subject  of  gossip 
only  if  they  are  flagrantly  pursued,  if  a  particular  union  becomes  well 
established,  or  if  a  man  is  openly  accused  by  his  wife  of  indulging  too 
freely  in  such  escapades.  Low-caste  people  overtly  accept  the  situation 
with  a  shrug  and  perhaps  a  bitter  comment:  "What  can  we  do  about 
it?  We  are  at  their  mercy."  They  harbor  strong  resentment,  however, 
and  express  it  privately. 

Relations  between  low-caste  men  and  high-caste  women  are  strongly 
condemned  and  severely  punished  if  detected  by  high-caste  people.  A 
low-caste  informant  who  had  an  apparently  well-earned  reputation 
as  a  ladies'  man  in  his  own  and  other  low  castes  commented,  "There 
is  plenty  of  opportunity  for  sex  relations  in  all  castes,  but  I  would  not 
risk  an  affair  with  a  high-caste  woman.  I  fear  for  my  head."  It  was 
universally  agreed  that  a  man  caught  in  such  a  relationship  would 
be  beaten,  probably  to  death,  or  chased  out  of  the  village.  Low-caste 
informants  asserted  that  such  affairs  were  occasionally  pursued  success- 
fully but  that  the  man  involved  had  to  be  very  sure  of  the  cooperation 
of  the  woman  because  she  could  easily  bring  about  his  downfall  by 
complaining  to  others,  and  if  the  relationship  were  discovered  she 
might  put  on  a  show  of  indignation  and  shift  the  blame  to  her  lover. 
The  man  takes  most  of  the  risk.  A  low-caste  informant  said: 

One  of  us  would  approach  a  Rajput  or  Brahmin  woman  only  if  we  were 
sure  she  had  her  eye  upon  us.  It  is,  after  all,  the  woman  who  takes  the 
initiative  in  sexual  matters  by  making  her  wishes  known  through  looks  and 
signals.  Contact  would  have  to  be  made  secretly  in  a  secluded  spot  unknown 
to  others.  If  the  woman  were  willing,  the  relationship  might  be  carried  out 
and  continued  successfully.  If  the  woman  were  unwilling  and  she  were  a 
gracious  person  who  wished  to  avoid  trouble,  her  reaction  to  such  an  ap- 
proach would  be  to  reply,  "Brother,  you  have  asked  me  once  and  I  excuse 
you.  I  respect  you  as  my  brother,  but  never  ask  me  again.  I  am  your  sister." 
This  would  be  the  end  of  the  matter  and  no  one  would  ever  know.  However, 
if  the  low-caste  man  were  foolish  enough  to  persist  or  if  the  woman  were 
touchy,  she  might  at  once  go  to  the  men  of  her  family  and  complain  and 
then  the  low-caste  man  would  be  in  grave  trouble.  For  this  reason  we  avoid 
such  dangers. 

That  such  relationships  do  occur  is  widely  known,  although  they  are 
concealed  by  high  castes.  Their  results  are  less  drastic  than  verbal 
testimony  would  lead  one  to  believe,  as  evidenced  by  the  shoemaker- 
Brahmin  elopement  described  in  chapter  5.  A  recent  case  in  Sirkanda 
had  been  that  of  a  Bajgi  man  and  a  Rajput  woman,  the  first  of  two  wives 
of  a  prominent  Rajput  householder.  The  lovers  had  evidently  been 


INTERCASTE    RELATIONS  235 

carrying  on  a  secret  affair  for  some  time  when  they  were  accidentally 
surprised  in  the  jungle  by  the  village  Brahmin.  The  Brahmin  was  in- 
different or  unable  to  identify  the  man,  who  beat  a  hasty  retreat,  and 
he  told  no  one.  The  Rajput  woman  was,  however,  afraid  that  the 
Brahmin  would  spread  the  word  through  the  village.  She  revealed  her 
fear  in  confidence  to  a  trusted  friend.  Later  the  two  women  had  a  falling 
out,  and  the  erstwhile  friend  exposed  the  illicit  relationship  to  others. 
The  Brahmin,  who  up  to  this  point  had  kept  his  knowledge  to  him- 
self, corroborated  the  story.  The  cuckolded  husband  did  nothing  to 
punish  the  low-caste  man  until  another  Rajput  man  had  occasion  to 
beat  the  offender  for  a  different  reason.  At  that  time  the  aggrieved 
husband  loudly  encouraged  the  beating  and  shouted,  "Beat  him  to 
death!"  The  end  result  was  that  the  beaten  man  and  his  father  went 
to  court  and  on  the  basis  of  testimony  by  witnesses  to  the  beating, 
including  a  Rajput  of  a  rival  faction,  received  a  judgment  in  their 
favor  by  which  the  two  Rajput  men  each  had  to  pay  a  fine.  The  hus- 
band held  his  tongue  throughout.  To  admit  publicly  to  having  been 
cuckolded  by  a  Bajgi  was  apparently  harder  than  to  ignore  it  publicly. 
His  wife  continued  to  be  his  first  wife,  and  her  lover  was  sufficiently 
frightened  to  break  off  the  relationship.  This  was  certainly  not  the  only 
affair  of  its  kind,  but  it  was  the  most  recent  one  to  have  come  to  public 
notice. 

In  intercaste  sex  relations  in  Sirkanda,  as  in  Negro-white  sex  rela- 
tions in  a  town  of  the  southern  United  States  reported  by  Dollard,  "It 
would  seem  .  .  .  that  the  taboo  falls  heaviest  on  social  acknowledge- 
ment of  such  relations  rather  than  on  the  fact  of  their  occurrence" 
(Dollard,  1957,  p.  151). 

Persistent  resentment  is  harbored  by  low-caste  people  toward  high- 
caste  people  in  Sirkanda,  especially  by  blacksmiths,  the  most  deprived 
group  in  the  village.  Most  of  the  Bajgis  and  the  barber  make  an 
adequate  income,  have  some  land  and  animals  of  their  own  to  supple- 
ment their  income,  and  therefore  have  less  cause  for  complaint.  They 
share  the  blacksmiths'  resentment  of  the  indignity  of  their  position 
and  the  injustice  of  their  treatment,  but  economic  well-being  softens 
their  feelings.  Only  the  blacksmiths  feel  acutely  underpaid  and  under- 
privileged. They  have  been  blocked  by  Rajputs  in  their  recent  efforts 
to  acquire  land  in  the  village.  When  a  strike  was  described  to  a  black- 
smith he  responded  by  saying, 

It  would  never  work  here.  The  Rajputs  would  just  beat  up  the  ones  who 
refused  to  work  and  throw  them  out  of  the  village.  Then  they  would  find 
someone  else  to  take  their  place — at  twice  the  pay  if  necessary.  We  are  small 
in  numbers  and  therefore  weak.  The  Rajputs  hold  the  key  to  the  low  castes 


236  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

and  can  manipulate  us  as  they  wish,  just  as  you  manipulate  the  radio  dial. 
Rajputs  don't  want  us  to  have  land  because  they  want  us  to  have  to  come 
begging  for  our  grain  payment.  When  we  ask  for  land,  they  laugh  at  us. 
The  Bajgis  and  barber  don't  join  with  us  in  our  efforts  to  get  land  because 
they  make  a  good  income  from  their  work,  and  anyway  they  already  have 
some  land.  We,  on  the  other  hand,  have  neither  land  nor  a  good  income 
from  our  work.  We  are  alone  in  our  desire  to  get  land,  and  it  seems  hopeless. 

High-  and  low-caste  men  alike  affirmed  the  obedience  accorded 
high-caste  men  by  low-caste  men.  However,  subtle  countermeasures 
were  admitted  by  low-castes  and  complained  of  by  high-castes.  Thus, 
in  performing  his  craft  a  blacksmith  claimed  to  do  work  quickly  and 
well  for  those  who  paid  him  promptly  and  justly  and  who  treated  him 
civilly  (as  many,  in  fact,  did)  and  to  do  it  poorly  and  slowly  for 
delinquent  or  arrogant  clients.  An  incident  of  this  nature  occurred 
in  the  writer's  presence.  While  it  conformed  to  no  reported  pattern 
of  intercaste  behavior,  it  aroused  no  comment  among  witnesses,  so 
it  was  apparently  not  out  of  the  range  of  acceptable  behavior.  A 
young  Rajput  man  of  a  large  household  known  by  village  artisans 
as  a  bad  credit  risk  and  not  a  particularly  desirable  client,  came  to  the 
blacksmith  with  an  axe  he  wanted  sharpened.  The  blacksmith,  who 
was  listening  to  the  anthropologist's  radio,  took  the  axe,  inspected  it 
with  evident  distaste,  and  announced,  "This  axe  is  worth  eight  annas, 
[to  cents].  My  file  is  worth  15  rupees  [three  dollars].  It  would  spoil 
my  valuable  file  to  sharpen  this  worthless  axe.  Go  find  a  flat  rock  and 
sharpen  it  yourself."  Further  feeble  entreaties  brought  nothing  but 
refusal  from  the  blacksmith,  and  the  Rajput  left,  presumably  in  search 
of  a  flat  rock. 

Needless  to  say,  the  blacksmith  did  not  frequently  practice  this 
pattern  of  behavior,  as  he  could  not  have  done  it  with  impunity  in 
other  circumstances.  He  would  not  have  tried  it,  for  instance,  with 
an  older  or  more  prestigeful  man.  However,  in  an  occasional  well- 
chosen  situation  he  could  get  by  with  it,  and  it  obviously  gave  him 
considerable  satisfaction.  Members  of  all  low  castes  relished  tales  of 
moral  victories  by  low-castes  over  high-caste  people. 

High-caste  men  do  not  observe  rules  of  pollution  carefully  when 
they  go  to  the  larger  towns.  There  they  eat  in  public  places  with 
people  whose  caste  they  do  not  know,  and  even  with  low-caste  people 
of  their  own  village.  They  patronize  the  same  prostitutes  as  are 
patronized  by  Doms  (and  by  Brahmins  from  the  plains).  They  would 
even  eat  at  the  homes  of  the  writer  and  his  Muslim  assistant,  although 
they  would  not  eat  in  their  house  in  the  village.  A  15-year-old  Rajput 
boy  expressed  the  attitude  of  most  men  when  he  politely  refused  to 


INTERCASTE  RELATIONS  237 

share  the  writer's  dinner  in  the  village  with  the  comment,  "I  would 
gladly  eat  if  we  were  elsewhere,  but  we  are  in  my  own  village.  Here 
everyone  knows  my  caste  and  I  must  be  careful  what  I  do.  In  town  no 
one  knows  me  nor  I  them,  and  I  do  as  I  please  without  fear  of 
consequences." 

The  influence  of  the  caste-equality,  anti-discrimination  stand  of 
the  dominant  Congress  party  in  India  has  been  felt  even  in  Sirkanda. 
The  president  of  the  village  council  occasionally  has  to  attend  a 
meeting  or  workshop  for  council  presidents  in  the  valley.  There  he 
not  only  hears  the  official  policy  of  the  party  to  which  he  nominally 
belongs  but  has  to  practice  it  by  eating  with  fellow  officials  and  civil 
servants  of  all  castes.  The  food  is  prepared  and  served  by  people  of 
unknown  (and  highly  suspect)  caste  status.  He  makes  no  effort  to 
conceal  this  when  he  returns  to  the  village,  but  it  does  not  alter  the 
fact  that  in  the  village  he  is  as  caste-conscious  and  discriminatory  as 
anyone  else. 

Anti-discrimination  talk  led  to  the  nearest  thing  to  a  test  case  of 
caste  discrimination  that  has  ever  occurred  in  the  village — in  itself  an 
indication  of  new  or  changing  attitudes.  The  blacksmith  who  holds 
the  village  council  seat  reserved  for  untouchables  planned  to  brew 
tea  at  his  home  and  serve  it  at  a  village  council  meeting  which  was  to 
be  attended  by  the  teacher,  village  level  worker,  accountant,  tax  col- 
lector, forestry  officer,  economic  cooperative  supervisor,  and  the  anthro- 
pologist in  addition  to  the  local  council  members.  The  blacksmith's 
intent  was  to  press  charges  of  caste  discrimination  if  anyone  refused  the 
tea,  and  he  counted  on  the  outsiders  to  form  an  august  body  of  im- 
partial witnesses.  He  made  his  intent  known  only  to  the  teacher, 
village  level  worker,  and  anthropologist.  However,  when  the  time 
came,  no  tea  appeared.  The  advocate  of  the  test  case  lamely  claimed 
to  have  forgotten,  but  in  reality  he  had  apparently  not  felt  like  risking 
the  probable  consequences  of  such  a  defiant  act  in  his  vulnerable 
position. 

In  discussing  caste  relations  in  the  village  a  young  Rajput  man 
complained: 

I  would  like  to  spend  more  time  at  your  house  talking  with  you  and 
listening  to  your  radio.  I  would  share  tea  and  food  with  you.  I  could  learn 
many  things  and  have  a  good  time.  But  too  many  low-caste  people  come 
there.  I  do  not  care  so  much  about  that  for  myself,  but  people  here  are  very 
strict.  On  the  plains  caste  rules  are  broken  frequently  and  everything  is 
breaking  down,  but  not  here.  We  cannot  share  food,  drink,  utensils,  or 
cigarettes  with  Doms.  I  must  live  my  life  in  this  village.  If  I  associate  with 
those  low  people  my  people  will  be  angry  with  me.  I  could  be  your  friend 


238  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

and  associate  with  Doms  at  your  house,  but  I  would  lose  my  friends  in  the 
village.  There  would  be  no  comfort  in  the  friendship  of  a  few  Doms  when 
you  are  gone. 

People  of  all  castes  denied  that  there  were  individual  differences 
in  the  strictness  of  caste  observance  among  high-caste  individuals. 
Everyone  maintained  that  in  the  village  all  were  equally  rigid.  Ob- 
servation proved  this  to  be  not  entirely  the  case.  While  most  high- 
caste  men  shared  cigarettes  only  in  their  group,  a  few  shared  them 
with  low-caste  men  as  well.  Some  interacted  socially  with  low-caste 
men  regularly;  others  did  so  rarely  or  not  at  all.  Age  and  position 
within  the  family  were  evidently  important  factors  in  this  context. 
Old  men  and  young  men  were  noticeably  less  concerned  with 
caste  rules  governing  social  interaction  than  were  middle-aged  men. 
Middle-aged  men  (roughly  35  to  55  years  of  age)  were  usually  also 
the  effective  family  heads.  They  were  the  leaders  of  their  castes.  They 
felt  responsible  for  maintaining  the  status  of  their  families  and  their 
castes.  They  were  the  most  suspicious  of  outsiders,  the  most  proud, 
the  most  arrogant  in  their  relationship  to  low  castes,  the  most  authori- 
tarian in  all  their  relationships. 

In  a  village  of  the  size  and  caste  composition  of  Sirkanda,  it  is 
almost  inevitable  that  a  good  deal  of  informal  social  interaction  will 
take  place  across  caste  lines,  including  the  high-low  caste  boundary. 
There  are  very  few  low-caste  people  in  a  predominantly  Rajput  village, 
and  the  village  is  isolated  from  other  villages.  If  low-caste  people 
are  to  have  social  life  at  all,  it  must  be  to  a  large  extent  with  Rajputs. 
In  Sirkanda  this  is  especially  true  because  the  two  blacksmith  house- 
holds are  not  on  good  terms  with  one  another,  nor  are  the  three  main 
Bajgi  households,  because  of  intrafamilial  strife.  Moreover,  the  black- 
smiths and  Bajgis  are  on  somewhat  strained  terms,  largely  because  of 
the  claims  to  higher  status  held  by  the  blacksmiths  and  the  reality 
of  greater  prosperity  of  the  Bajgis.  Bajgis  have  a  number  of  relatives 
within  easy  walking  distance  of  the  village,  and  much  of  their  social 
life  is  with  these  caste-fellows.  In  the  village,  however,  they,  like 
the  blacksmiths  who  have  few  relatives,  must  find  friends  among  the 
Rajputs.  The  amount  of  friendly  interaction  between  high  and  low 
castes  is  therefore  considerable — evidently  more  than  would  be  found 
on  the  plains  and  certainly  more  than  one  might  expect  from  the 
expressed  attitudes  of  these  groups  toward  one  another  and  the  formal 
restrictions  placed  upon  interaction  between  them.  That  such  inter- 
action is  allowed  by  the  high  castes  does  not  mean  that  caste  status  is 
ambiguous  but  rather  that  it  is  so  secure  that  it  is  not  jeopardized  by 
interaction  of  this  kind. 


INTERCASTE    RELATIONS  239 

The  place  of  work  of  each  artisan  is  a  gathering  place  for  men 
of  all  castes  to  sit  and  talk.  The  tailor's  veranda  is  rarely  without  one 
or  more  high-caste  people  watching  the  craftsman  at  his  work,  talking 
to  him  and  his  relatives  and  to  other  visitors.  The  same  is  true  of  the 
blacksmith's  workshop,  the  basketmaker's  porch,  the  sites  of  house 
construction,  and  the  carpenters'  work  areas.  The  village  shops  and 
school  serve  also  as  meeting  places  for  informal  social  interaction 
across  caste  boundaries.  High-caste  houses  are  the  locus  of  high-caste 
interaction,  but  not  uncommonly  a  low-caste  person  may  participate, 
sitting  on  the  steps  or  doorsill  or  standing  outside. 

Intercaste  groups  form  in  various  circumstances.  Intercaste  work 
groups  are  common,  including  both  cooperative  labor  and  independ- 
ent labor  performed  in  groups  (as  tending  goats  and  gathering  wood 
or  fodder).  In  times  of  trouble  or  need,  caste  boundaries  may  be  subor- 
dinated. A  Rajput  family  of  Sirkanda  owes  its  prosperity  to  loans 
granted  it  a  generation  ago  by  a  sympathetic  Brahmin  when  the 
family  was  not  producing  enough  to  survive.  A  nearby  Brahmin  family 
took  in  a  homeless  Rajput  widow  and  her  invalid  son  when  they  had 
nowhere  to  turn.  Rajputs  did  not  hesitate  to  borrow  money  from  a 
blacksmith  two  generations  ago.  When  the  Brahmins  were  in  need 
of  a  place  to  stay  during  part  of  the  time  their  house  was  being  re- 
built in  1958,  they  stayed  with  a  blacksmith  family  although  they  ate 
separately.  Those  who  have  to  travel  away  from  the  village  seek  travel- 
ing companions,  and  no  caste  is  excluded  from  such  a  group.  Inter- 
caste groups  often  go  to  town  to  trade,  to  do  business  at  government 
offices,  or  even  to  seek  entertainment  together.  In  the  village  and  out- 
side, drinking  and  gambling  groups  are  often  intercaste  in  composition. 
The  famous  illicit  woman-selling  gang  of  Bhatbair  was  made  up  of 
a  Brahmin,  a  Rajput,  and  a  Bajgi  who  worked  as  a  team,  sharing  the 
risks  and  profits  with  little  caste  distinction. 

Perhaps  the  most  frequent  occasion  for  intimate  social  interaction 
across  caste  lines  in  the  village  is  at  drinking  parties.  There  caste 
barriers  are  largely  ignored.  Low-caste  people  may  be  invited  to  a 
high-caste  house  where  a  party  is  to  be  held,  and  there  they  are  allowed 
to  participate  fully  in  it.  Of  course  such  parties  are  held  on  verandas 
of  houses,  not  in  cooking  areas,  and  boiled  food  is  not  served,  so  it  is 
not  potentially  a  very  polluting  situation.  Although  low  castes  may 
contribute  liquor,  they  do  not  furnish  the  site  for  such  parties.  In 
Sirkanda  one  blacksmith  and  one  Bajgi  are  inveterate  participants  in 
high-caste  drinking  parties. 

In  general,  activities  which  are  illegal,  overtly  disapproved,  or  non- 
Sanskritic  are  much  more  likely  to  be  intercaste  in  nature  than  are 


240  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

those  which  are  entirely  legal,  approved,  and  orthodox.  Thus  inter- 
caste  drinking,  meat-eating,  dancing,  and  trips  to  town  are  indulged 
in  often  with  little  regard  for  caste  differences.  Even  illicit  sex  activity 
may  be  pursued  by  intercaste  groups  who  together  go  to  a  house  of 
prostitution  or  approach  low-caste  girls  outside  the  village.  A  Rajput 
and  blacksmith  both  told  a  story  on  themselves  which  occurred  at 
the  Pahari  fair.  The  blacksmith  was  paying  for  Ferris  wheel  rides 
and  sweets  for  two  Muslim  girls  of  easy  virtue  when  the  Rajput  came 
and  joined  in.  Both  were  confident  of  their  reward  until  the  girls 
got  off  the  Ferris  wheel  and  were  spirited  away  by  two  husky  strangers, 
to  the  dismay  of  the  girls'  erstwhile  benefactors. 

Among  the  most  colorful  personalities  in  Sirkanda  is  a  blacksmith 
man.  His  company  is  sought  and  enjoyed  by  all.  No  party  or  discussion 
is  complete  without  him.  His  wit  and  good  judgment  combine  to  make 
him  popular  despite  his  caste  status.  He  is  the  greatest  talker  and  gossip 
in  the  village.  He  spreads  news  and  helps  formulate  opinion.  He  is 
the  repository  of  knowledge  not  possessed  by  others;  he  remembers 
things  others  forget.  More  than  once  Rajputs  turned  to  him  when 
questioned  for  details  of  their  own  genealogies  or  family  histories. 
Although  in  many  contexts  he  plays  the  role  of  the  joker,  his  opinion 
on  serious  matters  is  highly  valued  but  rarely,  to  his  disgust,  acknowl- 
edged. When  unusual  circumstances  arise,  he  is  often  sent  forth  to 
appraise  the  situation  or  express  village  sentiments.  Numerous  ex- 
amples could  be  cited.  When  a  horse  trader  came  to  Sirkanda,  the 
blacksmith  was  sent  to  look  over  the  horses  and  sound  out  their  owner 
before  high-caste  potential  customers  made  an  appearance.  He  passed 
judgment  on  the  trader's  honesty,  his  willingness  to  bargain,  and  the 
value  of  his  horses.  As  he  himself  noted,  he  received  no  thanks  for  his 
efforts,  although  several  villagers  relied  heavily  on  his  advice  in  sub- 
sequent purchases. 

When  the  Brahmin  family  wanted  to  move  a  large  rock  which 
they  thought  endangered  their  house  but  which  was  on  village  prop- 
erty, Rajputs  objected.  The  blacksmith  looked  it  over,  said  "This  rock 
is  a  hazard  to  the  Brahmin's  house  and  should  be  moved,"  and  began 
to  decide  the  best  method  of  moving  it.  Soon  the  Rajputs  were  helping. 
This  blacksmith  is  the  usual  choice  for  making  contact  with  and 
appraising  strangers — a  role  which  a  low-caste  man  can  perform  well 
without  committing  the  village.  He  is  the  informal  channel  for  com- 
munication with  outsiders  and  sometimes  with  rival  factions.  When 
the  schoolteacher  was  new,  the  blacksmith  communicated  to  him  village 
attitudes  on  schooling  and  the  role  of  the  teacher.  When  the  anthro- 
pologist considered  moving  into  a  house  in  the  most  crowded  section 
of  the  village,  the  blacksmith  was  sent  to  voice  the  objections  of  some 


INTERCASTE    RELATIONS  24 1 

influential  villagers  (stating  them  as  his  own),  who  were  thus  able  to 
have  their  opinions  voiced  while  denying  any  responsibility  and,  in 
fact,  condemning  the  blacksmith  for  inhospitality. 

This  is  not  to  assert  that  the  blacksmith  is  the  most  important  man 
in  the  village  or  even  that  his  opinion  was  decisive  in  all  the  above 
cases.  It  does,  however,  point  out  that  one  low-caste  man,  at  least,  is 
important  far  beyond  the  admission  or  realization  of  his  caste  superiors 
and  far  beyond  their  ideal  of  the  complaisant,  subservient,  know- 
nothing  Dom.  He  has  achieved  importance  largely  as  a  result  of 
personal  characteristics  which  override  his  caste  status.  It  is  significant 
that  his  importance  is  not  admitted  or  even  realized  by  most  villagers, 
and  his  caste  status  is  never  forgotten  or  ignored. 

He  is  apparently  an  atypical  Dom,  but  he  is  not  beyond  the  range 
of  permissible  behavior  in  Doms.  Some  individuals  in  each  of  the 
other  Dom  castes  were  to  a  lesser  extent  influential  in  the  village. 

High-caste  jealousy  of  this  blacksmith  reveals  implicit  recognition 
of  his  role.  He  was  often  accused  of  not  knowing  his  place,  of  having 
big  ideas,  or  of  being  a  troublemaker.  His  wit  was  sometimes  dis- 
paraged by  those  who  could  not  equal  it.  His  love  of  liquor,  women, 
music,  laughter,  and  leisure  were  frequently  criticized.  That  he  made 
fun  of  himself  on  these  very  grounds  only  served  to  exasperate  his 
detractors.  As  he  said, 

People  here  are  very  jealous.  I  have  to  be  careful  lest  I  suffer  their  wrath. 
Even  if  I  wanted  and  could  afford  some  comforts  and  a  better  house  or  better 
clothes  I  could  not  have  them  because  Rajputs  would  accuse  me  of  putting 
on  airs.  I  must  always  remain  humble  to  them  if  I  am  to  survive  in  this  village. 

This  man  frequently  mentioned  wealthy  caste-fellows  of  his,  resident 
in  other  villages,  who  surpass  local  Rajputs  in  wealth  and  sophisti- 
cation but  are  still  untouchable  in  their  eyes.  This  he  considered  to 
be  an  example  of  unreasoning  pride  on  the  part  of  Rajputs.  He  as- 
serted that  they  would  not  tolerate  action  on  the  part  of  low-caste 
people  which  they  consider  inconsistent  with  caste  status. 

I  could  put  these  Rajputs  to  shame  by  getting  a  table  and  serving  you 
with  food  and  drink  at  my  house.  They  would  be  envious  and  angry  and 
after  you  are  gone  they  would  make  it  hard  on  me.  Therefore  I  must  show 
that  I  know  my  station  and  not  be  unduly  close  to  you  in  public  social  re- 
lationships. They  will  be  jealous  when  you  give  me  your  radio.  For  that 
reason  I  will  have  to  tell  them  that  I  bought  it  from  you.  They  are  jealous 
to  see  me  associating  with  big  people. 

On  another  occasion  he  remarked  upon  his  relationship  with 
Rajputs: 


242  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

No  matter  how  friendly  a  Rajput  may  be  at  one  time,  he  will  turn  against 
a  low-caste  person  the  next  time.  All  are  proud  and  jealous  of  their  caste 
position.  None  are  true  friends  to  us.  They  always  resent  my  presence  in 
social  situations.  They  will  eat  with  me  in  Dehra  Dun  but  never  in  the 
village.  They  will  drink  liquor  with  me  and  often  invite  me  to  sit  on  their 
veranda  to  do  so.  If  they  are  having  something  dry  like  parched  gram  [chick 
peas],  I  can  eat  it  with  them.  If  they  have  something  cooked,  I  am  given  a 
separate  plate.  They  are  very  strict  on  such  matters.  I  am  with  them  a  great 
deal,  but  I  cannot  say  they  are  my  true  friends.  I  am  always  a  Dom  and  they 
are  big  people.  Here  big  people  mingle  with  other  big  people  as  friends. 
I  call  that  man  truly  big  who  mingles  with  high  and  low  alike.  Such  are 
not  to  be  found  in  this  village. 

Vested  Interests  in  Caste 

The  functioning  of  the  caste  system  in  an  Indian  village  can  be 
assessed  on  several  different  levels.  From  the  point  of  view  of  the 
community  or  of  the  society  as  a  system,  the  Indian  caste  system  is 
remarkably  efficient.  Ideally,  it  assures  a  stable  division  of  labor  with 
a  constant  supply  of  specialists  in  all  occupations.  In  return  it  pro- 
vides the  individual  with  an  assured  occupation,  an  assured  income, 
and  a  body  of  people  who  share  his  interests.  It  provides  a  religious 
and  philosophical  rationale  for  differences  in  status  and  standard  of 
living  which  minimizes  discontent  and  subversion.  It  is  preordained 
and  static,  so  that  status  change  is,  ideally,  impossible.  It  reduces  am- 
biguity by  the  recognition  of  rules  and  symbols  segregating  social 
groups.  It  minimizes  intergroup  frictions.  It  provides  stable  group 
identification  and  affiliation  for  individuals  at  all  status  levels  and 
minimizes  the  chances  of  disparity  between  reference  group  and  mem- 
bership group  and  the  potentially  disintegrative  results  of  such  dis- 
parity. 

Not  only  does  everyone  have  some  place  within  the  Hindu  system,  but 
it  is  significant  that  every  group,  from  the  Brahmin  to  the  Chamar  caste,  has 
been  somehow  integrated  into  the  social  and  ceremonial  round  of  the  com- 
munity and  has  been  given  some  opportunity  to  feel  indispensable  and  proud. 
(Opler  and  R.  Singh,  1948,  p.  496) 

That  the  system  has  not  been  completely  successful;  that  change, 
discontent,  and  subversion  occur  in  spite  of  the  system,  does  not  belie 
its  relative  efficiency  as  a  system.  Breakdowns  in  discipline,  changes 
in  caste  status,  and  the  like,  are  either  suppressed  or  rationalized. 
Rationalizations  become  part  of  the  system  and  are  not  remembered  as 
deviations  from  it.  What  these  facts  do  reveal  is  that  there  is  more 


INTERCASTE  RELATIONS  243 

to  caste  than  its  ideal  structure.  Human  beings  are  involved,  and  the 
effects  of  the  system  on  the  individuals  who  live  in  it  must  be  under- 
stood if  its  functioning  in  reality  is  to  be  understood.  Despite  pious 
statements  to  the  contrary  in  India  and  elsewhere,  no  group  of  people 
has  been  reported  which  relishes  a  life  of  deprivation  and  subjection 
to  other  groups.  That  people  submit  to  depressed  status  does  not 
mean  that  they  feel  it  is  justified  nor  that  they  would  not  like  to  see 
it  changed,  nor,  in  fact,  that  they  would  not  do  everything  in  their 
power  to  change  it  if  given  the  opportunity.  The  rationalizations  for 
caste  status  which  are  consistent  and  convincing  to  those  who  benefit 
from  them  or  are  unaffected  by  them  seem  much  less  so  to  those  whose 
deprivation  they  are  expected  to  justify  or  explain.  Adherence  to  a 
religion  or  a  religious  principle  may  not  significantly  affect  attitudes 
and  behavior  to  which  logic  would  seem  to  tie  it.  It  will  be  well, 
therefore,  to  look  briefly  at  caste  as  it  affects  people.  As  John  Dollard 
has  said  in  studying  caste  and  class  structure  in  a  town  of  the  southern 
United  States, 

We  should  like  to  know  something  not  only  about  the  class  structure  but 
also  about  the  differential  advantages  and  disadvantages  of  membership  in 
any  particular  caste  or  class;  and,  in  particular,  we  wish  to  state  these  ad- 
vantages and  disadvantages  from  the  standpoint  of  the  types  of  direct,  per- 
sonal, ultimately  organic,  gratification  derived.  (Dollard,  1957,  pp.  97  f.) 

Following  Dollard,  I  will  state  the  advantages  which  the  caste 
system  in  Sirkanda  provides  for  its  high-caste  participants.  Inherent 
in  most  of  these  advantages  are  disadvantages  which  automatically 
fall  to  the  low  castes.  An  effort  will  be  made  to  point  out  as  well  those 
ways  in  which  low  castes  may  benefit  from  the  caste  system.  "In  using 
the  concept  of  'gains'  we  are  not  leaving  the  'social'  plane  of  percep- 
tion; we  will  merely  .  .  .  look  for  a  moment  at  the  individuals  rather 
than  at  the  society"  (Dollard,  1957,  p.  98).  In  listing  gains  the  three 
broad  categories  suggested  by  Dollard  will  be  used:  the  economic, 
sexual,  and  prestige  gains.  In  addition,  a  fourth  category,  here  called 
"ultimate  rewards,"  will  be  mentioned.  Use  of  Dollard's  categorization 
for  this  portion  of  the  Sirkanda  data  is  based  not  upon  the  pressing 
of  data  into  alien  molds  but  upon  my  belief  in  real  similarities  in  the 
situations  analyzed — a  position  elaborated  in  another  publication 
(Berreman,  1960a). 

The  discussion  need  not  be  lengthy  because  most  of  the  evidence  has 
been  presented  in  this  and  other  chapters.  An  effort  will  be  made 
not  only  to  assert  that  a  particular  gain  is  achieved  but  to  show  that 
gain  by  particular  individuals  is  a  result  of  the  caste  hierarchy.  Al- 


2^4  INTERCASTE   RELATIONS 

though  the  discussion  is  based  primarily  upon  Sirkanda  data,  the  same 
sort  of  analysis,  leading  to  essentially  the  same  conclusions,  could  no 
doubt  be  made  in  other  Indian  villages. 

It  seems  likely  that,  in  villages  where  caste  dominance  is  less  clear- 
cut  than  in  Sirkanda,  our  present  approach  would  produce  less  con- 
sistent evidence.  An  economically  deprived  high-caste  or  a  wealthy 
low-caste  person  might  well  upset  the  statements  about  economic 
gain,  but  they  would  have  done  so  in  spite  of  caste  affiliation.  Caste 
affiliation  would  doubtless  still  be  a  force  in  the  expected  direction 
even  if  it  were  overcome  by  other  factors.  Such  a  case,  looked  at  from 
this  point  of  view,  would  be  an  interesting  study.  The  obvious  con- 
clusion would  probably  be  that  caste  operates  to  the  best  advantage 
of  high  castes  when  their  rank  is  correlated  positively  with  decisive 
dominance. 

Obtaining  reliable  data  on  intercaste  relations  and  attitudes  is  a 
difficult  task.  It  is  especially  difficult  in  India,  where  any  evidently 
educated  or  urbanized  person  is  automatically  classed  by  low-caste 
villagers  as  a  member  of  the  elite  regardless  of  his  professed  aims  and 
affiliations,  and  by  the  high-caste  villagers  as  a  potential  threat  to 
the  status  quo.  The  low-caste  informant  is  likely  to  be  wary  of  saying 
or  doing  anything  which  might  conceivably  be  held  against  him  at 
a  later  date.  Many  high-caste  people,  on  the  other  hand,  are  aware 
of  official  doctrines  of  equalitarianism  and  may  respond  verbally  in 
ways  quite  different  from  those  which  represent  their  true  feelings 
on  the  subject  (cf.  Berreman,  1962c). 

In  Sirkanda  these  were  problems  in  obtaining  data,  but  information 
was  obtained  from  enough  different  people  and  observations  were 
made  in  so  many  different  situations,  that  a  body  of  reliable  and 
apparently  valid  information  was  obtained.  Where  inconsistencies 
occurred,  they  were  often  closely  linked  to  situational  factors.  Re- 
sponses of  both  low-  and  high-caste  people  varied  predictably  in  the 
presence  of  the  opposite  status  group,  while  responses  of  some  in- 
dividuals varied  predictably  in  the  presence  of  their  caste-fellows. 
Since  these  were  predictable  variations,  they  apparently  did  not  con- 
taminate the  data. 

In  this  discussion  the  only  status  distinction  to  be  considered  will 
be  that  between  nigh  and  low,  or  clean  and  untouchable,  castes.  This 
is  a  valid  distinction  in  the  Pahari  area,  as  preceding  discussion  has 
shown,  in  terms  of  both  ritual  and  secular  status  attributes.  Subsidiary 
caste  distinctions  will  not  be  dealt  with  because  in  Sirkanda  they  are 
minor  by  comparison  and  would  only  serve  to  provide  lesser  examples 


INTERCASTE  RELATIONS  245 

of  the  points  made  more  clearly  in  an  examination  of  the  major  status 
distinction. 

The  Economic  Gain 

It  has  been  pointed  out  that  land  is  wealth  in  Sirkanda.  The 
high  castes,  by  restricting  land  ownership  to  themselves  before  British 
dominion,  ensured  their  own  economic  dominance.  The  paramount 
importance  of  land  is  recognized  by  Sirkanda  villagers,  as  has  been 
illustrated  by  examples  and  quotations  in  previous  chapters.  It  is 
further  illustrated  by  the  history  of  the  struggle  which  the  villagers 
have  waged  and  are  still  waging  for  land.  The  high-caste  villagers 
considered  it  a  victory  when,  under  the  British,  the  bhaichara  land 
ownership  pattern  was  established,  eliminating  an  intermediary  land- 
lord and  giving  the  cultivators  direct  ownership  of  their  lands.  The 
low  castes  considered  it  an  even  greater  victory  when  lands  formerly 
allotted  to  them  only  for  use  (that  is,  they  did  not  own  these  lands) 
were  assigned  by  law  to  their  castes  and  later  to  them  as  individuals. 
Until  that  time  high  castes  had  control  over  low  castes  in  that  lands 
and  dwellings  alike  were  in  the  names  of  high-caste  owners.  An  un- 
ruly, disobedient,  or  disrespectful  artisan  was  readily  dispossessed  of 
house  and  livelihood.  Post-Independence  restriction  on  further  de- 
velopment of  uncultivated  lands  by  villagers  has  brought  bitter  resent- 
ment of  the  government  by  all  castes. 

Efforts  by  low  castes  to  acquire  more  land  have  been  fought  at 
every  turn  by  the  high  castes,  not  because  they  stand  to  lose  land 
as  a  result  (they  do  not),  but  because  they  stand  to  lose  a  measure  of 
economic  dominance.  Thus,  the  village  blacksmiths  have  needed  only 
the  support  of  the  village  council  president  or  the  accountant  to  put 
in  a  request  to  open  up  heretofore  uncultivated  village  lands.  The 
council  and  its  president  have  stated,  "If  you  want  land,  you  will  have 
to  leave  this  village  to  get  it."  They  have  used  their  influence  to 
prevent  the  village  accountant  (a  government  official  alien  to  the 
village)  from  submitting  a  favorable  report  on  behalf  of  the  black- 
smiths. In  the  closest  village  to  Sirkanda  a  blacksmith  had  been 
granted  a  share  of  village  lands  under  the  British,  the  only  low-caste 
person  of  that  village  who  was  so  fortunate.  A  few  years  ago  he  decided 
to  sell  part  of  this  land.  Over  high-caste  protests  he  sold  it  to  a  local, 
landless  Bajgi  who  was  his  friend.  The  high-caste  villagers  were  in- 
furiated. They  retaliated  by  calling  the  police,  making  out  a  false 
accusation  of  theft  against  the  hapless  blacksmith,  and  bribing  the 
police  to  ensure  that  he  would  be  punished.  As  a  result  he  served 


246  INTERCASTE    RELATIONS 

seven  months  in  jail.  As  one  of  his  caste-fellows  said,  "You  can't  go 
against  the  wishes  of  high-caste  people  and  get  away  with  it  around 
here."  Low-caste  people  occasionally  openly  accuse  Rajputs  of  "wanting 
to  keep  us  in  slavery,"  and  not  wanting  to  see  them  economically 
secure  or  self-sufficient. 

To  keep  the  low  castes  dependent  not  only  assures  greater  income 
for  the  higher  castes;  it  also  assures  a  ready  supply  of  cheap  labor. 
For,  as  long  as  the  low  castes  are  dependent  for  their  livelihood  upon 
high  castes,  the  latter  can  call  upon  them  for  all  sorts  of  services,  under 
implicit  or  explicit  threat  of  economic  sanctions.  Low-caste  members 
are  available  to  carry  loads,  thatch  houses,  pound  tobacco,  clean  up 
debris,  plaster  floors,  run  errands,  or  help  in  any  work  where  another 
person  is  needed.  They  also  brew  liquor,  kill  animals,  and  perform 
other  unpleasant,  risky,  or  polluting  tasks  at  high-caste  bidding.  As 
long  as  they  are  landless  or  own  insufficient  land  for  survival,  the  high 
castes  can  use  them  almost  at  will.  Thus  the  high  castes  have  a  strong 
economic  interest  in  maintaining  the  caste  system  in  its  traditional 
form,  which  includes  economic  dominance  over  the  low  castes.  This 
is  perhaps  the  key  enabling  factor  in  sexual  and  prestige  gains  as  well. 

An  economic  advantage  of  the  caste  system  which  is  specific  to 
Brahmins  is  their  role  as  recipients  of  charity — charity  which  is  neces- 
sary to  ensure  a  favorable  future  for  the  soul  of  the  giver  (cf.  Weber, 
1958,  p.  60).  This  is  an  India-wide  phenomenon  and  the  degree  to 
which  individual  Brahmins  exploit  it  varies,  but  it  is  apparently  no 
accident  that  the  formulators  and  primary  agents  of  communication 
of  the  religio-philosophical  tradition  are  its  greatest  benefactors. 
Stories  illustrating  the  necessity  of  giving  ample  charity  are  widely 
repeated  in  Sirkanda  and  elsewhere.  Such  stories  are  told  primarily 
by  Brahmins  and  are  often  included  in  their  professional  services  of 
reading  the  past  and  future  fate  of  villagers  in  horoscopes.  Villagers 
often  refer  to  the  avariciousness  of  Brahmins  and  sarcastically  hint 
at  pecuniary  motives  in  their  visits  or  scheduling  of  ceremonies. 

All  economic  gain  is  not  on  the  side  of  the  high  castes;  there  are 
compensatory  gains  for  low  castes.  Specific  gains  which  accrue  to  low 
castes  include  exclusive  access  to  a  number  of  foods  and  other  goods. 
Shoemakers,  for  example,  get  the  carcasses  of  dead  animals,  which 
provide  both  materials  for  their  trade  and  meat  for  consumption.  Such 
advantages  are  more  pronounced  on  the  plains,  where  diet  differs  by 
caste  more  than  it  does  in  Sirkanda.  Under  the  traditional  system  the 
low-caste  individual  was  assured  of  work  and  of  payment  for  it  as  long 
as  he  did  not  offend  his  employer.  He  also  expected  and  received  a 
paternalistic  sort  of  care  and  protection  much  like  that  accorded  the 


INTERCASTE  RELATIONS  247 

Negro  who  knew  his  place  in  the  American  "Old  South."  These  were 
notable  compensations  for  dependent  status.  However,  they  often  did 
not  satisfy  the  low-caste  person  and  were  in  themselves  aspects  of  the 
exploitative  economic  situation  perpetuated  by  the  upper  castes.  They 
were  the  kinds  of  compensations  an  authoritarian  system  often  offers 
its  subjects. 

Srinivas  notes  in  the  Mysore  village  he  studied  that: 

While  the  Governments  of  India  and  Mysore  want  to  abolish  Untouch- 
ability,  and  the  Untouchables  themselves  want  to  improve  their  position,  the 
locally  dominant  caste  stands  in  its  way:  its  members  want  the  Untouchables 
to  supply  them  with  cheap  labor  and  perform  degrading  tasks.  .  .  .  They 
have  the  twin  sanction  of  physical  force  and  boycott  at  their  disposal. 
(Srinivas,  1959,  p.  4) 

K.  Singh  found  that,  out  of  five  frequently  cited  grounds  for  conflict 
leading  to  tension  between  landowners  and  low  castes  in  a  plains 
village,  two  were  directly  economic  and  two  others  indirectly  so 
(Singh,  1957,  p.  185).  Lewis  makes  much  of  the  economic  advantages 
which  accrue  to  high-caste  landlords  at  the  expense  of  the  low  castes 
that  serve  them  in  Rampur  (Lewis,  1958,  pp.  55  ff.,  especially  79-84). 
P.  M.  Mahar  (1958),  interviewing  in  a  plains  village,  found  that  a 
Rajput  elder  ".  .  .  disapproves  of  educational  advancement  for  un- 
touchables not  only  because  of  sacred  precedent,  but  also  because  it 
will  lead  to  a  depletion  of  the  Rajputs'  labor  supply."  She  quotes  the 
informant: 

Now  the  government  says  all  should  become  one.  We  are  afraid  of  that. 
Now  we  can't  get  anyone  to  work  for  us.  If  they  are  all  clerks  and  gentlemen, 
who  will  plow  our  fields?  Even  now  it  is  hard  to  get  laborers.  It  used  to  be 
you  could  get  a  man  for  five  rupees  to  work  for  you.  Now  they  ask  thirty 
or  forty.  (P.  M.  Mahar,  1958,  p.  56) 

This  reasoning  explains  in  part  the  emotional  reaction  by  high- 
caste  people  in  Sirkanda  to  low-caste  attempts  to  acquire  land  and 
achieve  economic  security.  Such  attempts  are  a  threat  to  their  own 
economic  dominance  and  ultimately  to  their  status. 

The  Sexual  Gain  - 

The  sexual  advantages  of  high-caste  status  in  Sirkanda  are  not 
inconsiderable,  but  they  are  less  pronounced  and  are  probably  less 
important  motives  for  maintenance  of  the  status  quo  than  is  the  case 
in  many  plains  areas.  The  reason  is  simply  that  in  Sirkanda  there  is 
a  relatively  high  degree  of  permissiveness  in  matters  of  extramarital 
sex  relations  within  and  between  castes.  Men  and  women  rarely  lack 


248  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

for  variety  in  sexual  partners  if  that  is  their  desire.  On  the  plains,  in 
contrast,  there  is  close  supervision  of  high-caste  women. 

This  does  not,  however,  alter  the  basic  fact  that  in  Sirkanda  the 
low  castes  provide  a  constant  source  of  available  women  for  high- 
caste  men,  and  the  men  are  not  reluctant  to  make  use  of  this  advantage. 
It  is  the  one  relationship  in  which  a  man  can  find  a  sex  partner  to 
whom  he  owes  nothing  and  from  whom  he  needs  fear  no  trouble. 
While  he  may  make  sexual  use  of  women  of  his  own  caste,  he  will 
be  expected  to  supply  them  with  trinkets,  cigarettes,  sweets,  or  other 
favors  to  show  his  appreciation.  He  also  runs  the  risk  of  a  fight  with 
an  irate  husband  or  his  own  irate  wife.  A  low-caste  woman  expects 
and  usually  gets  no  more  than  a  cigarette  for  her  favors;  her  husband  is 
in  no  position  to  exact  revenge;  the  chances  of  the  news  reaching  the 
high-caste  man's  wife  are  less  across  caste  boundaries  than  within  a 
caste,  and  even  if  it  does  the  wife  is  unlikely  to  be  particularly  upset 
or  able  to  win  sympathy  from  others  if  she  is.  A  low-caste  woman  is 
not  considered  a  serious  threat  to  a  high-caste  wife.  Such  liaisons  are 
expected  and  are  usually  lightly  dismissed.  An  example  of  this  attitude 
is  found  in  the  case  of  a  prominent  Rajput,  whose  short-lived  liaison 
with  a  low-caste  girl  has  become  a  family  joke  told  by  his  wife,  whereas 
his  liaison  with  a  Rajput  widow  caused  a  serious  and  never-again 
mentioned  family  fight.  Low-caste  men's  resentment  of  free  use  of 
their  women  by  high-caste  men  is  suppressed  but  comes  to  the  surface 
readily  when  the  subject  is  discussed  out  of  the  hearing  of  high  castes. 
Low-caste  women,  too,  resent  the  advantage  taken  of  them  by  high- 
caste  men. 

Relations  between  low-caste  men  and  high-caste  women,  when  they 
do  occur,  are  extremely  risky  for  both  parties  in  view  of  the  attitudes 
of  high-caste  men.  Informants  of  all  castes  affirm  the  dire  nature  of  the 
punishment  which  would  befall  the  participants  if  caught.  Exagger- 
ated fear  is  also  revealed  in  precautions  taken  by  high-caste  men  to 
prevent  such  contacts,  for  example,  often  prohibiting  their  women- 
folk from  attending  intercaste  occasions  where  drinking  and  dancing 
occur,  such  as  fairs,  celebrations,  and  so  on. 

Some  idea  of  the  sexual  gain  enjoyed  by  high-caste  men  can  be 
inferred  from  the  fact  that  eleven  recognized  unions  of  some  duration 
between  high-caste  men  and  low-caste  women  were  reported  for 
Sirkanda  and  neighboring  villages.  Only  one  recognized  union  between 
a  low-caste  man  and  a  high-caste  woman  occurred,  and  it  was  in  a 
more  distant  village  than  any  of  the  others  (thus,  more  unusual,  and 
so  reported  and  remembered  more  widely).  It  involved  an  elopement 
out  of  the  area,  unlike  the  other  eleven,  all  of  which  were  carried  on 


INTERCASTE   RELATIONS  249 

in  Bhatbair.  Similarly,  casual  affairs  and  extramarital  sex  relationships 
were  frequently  reported  between  high-caste  men  and  low-caste 
women,  while  extremely  few  cases  of  the  reverse  situation  were  re- 
ported.1 Whether  these  reports  reflect  sexual  behavior  accurately  or 
not  (and  it  is  likely  that  they  do),  they  certainly  reflect  attitudes 
accurately. 

There  is  little  in  the  way  of  compensatory  sexual  gain  for  low- 
caste  men  in  Sirkanda.  Looking  at  the  situation  from  the  low-caste 
woman's  point  of  view,  it  could  be  argued  that  she  derives  a  gain 
comparable  to  that  of  the  high-caste  man  and  that  the  high-caste 
woman  is  deprived  as  is  the  low-caste  man.  Actually,  the  high-caste 
man  has  the  advantage  of  choice  which  the  low-caste  woman  is  denied, 
though  both  have  access  to  a  greater  variety  of  partners  than  have 
their  spouses.  In  other  areas  of  India  greater  freedom  of  sexual  ex- 
pression is  allowed  low-caste  people  within  their  status  group  than  is 
allowed  high-caste  people  within  theirs,  but  there  is  little  caste  differ- 
ence on  this  score  in  Sirkanda.  An  economic  gain  may  accrue  to  low- 
caste  people  from  the  high-caste  sexual  gain.  Occasionally  a  low-caste 
woman  succeeds  in  getting  money,  clothing,  or  other  goods  from  a 
high-caste  lover,  and  in  at  least  one  instance  in  a  village  near  Sirkanda 
the  low-caste  husband  encouraged  his  wife  in  an  affair  that  bordered 
between  prostitution  and  concubinage. 

Sexual  gain  derived  by  high  castes  as  a  result  of  their  status  position 
in  the  system  is  frequently  implicit  in  accounts  from  other  areas  of 
India  and  seems,  in  fact,  to  be  a  universal  aspect  of  caste  in  India. 
Majumdar  (1944,  pp.  175  f.)  remarks  that  Rajput  men  cannot  marry 
or  have  social  intercourse  with  Dom  women  but  can  have  sex  relations 
with  them  or  keep  them  as  mistresses.  Lewis  (1958,  p.  257)  notes  that 
".  .  .  lower-caste  women  are  more  vulnerable  than  the  women  of  other 
castes  to  the  sexual  advances  of  higher-caste  men."  Cohn  (1955,  p.  68) 
says  that  "it  was  a  commonplace  a  generation  ago  for  a  Thakur  man 
to  have  sexual  relations  with  a  Camar  woman.  This  still  occurs  .  .  ." 
Stevenson  asserts: 

A  man  may  keep  as  a  lover  or  a  concubine  a  lower  status  woman,  from 
whose  hand  he  would  not  take  either  food  or  water,  without  requiring 
further  purification  than  a  bath  after  contact.  A  high  status  woman  con- 
ducting a  liaison  with  a  lower  status  man,  however,  would  be  expelled  from 
her  status  group.  (Stevenson,  1954,  p.  57) 

A  standard  joke  told  in  the  plains  concerns  two  Chamar  women  watch- 
ing the  funeral  procession  of  an  old  landlord.  As  the  body  is  carried 
past,  one  hand  falls  out  from  under  the  shroud  and  flops  about.  One 


■ ' 


25O  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

Chamar  woman  turns  to  the  other  and  says,  "You  see,  Thakur  Singh 
is  dead,  but  he  still  beckons  to  us." 

In  general  the  situation  conforms  to  that  in  Southerntown  as  re- 
ported by  Dollard.  In  this  and  the  following  quotations  from  Dollard, 
I  have  substituted  the  words  in  brackets:  "high-caste"  for  "white,"  and 
"low-caste"  for  "Negro." 

.  .  .  [High-caste]  men,  by  virtue  of  their  caste  position,  have  access  to  two 
classes  of  women,  those  of  the  [high]  and  [low]  castes.  The  same  condition 
is  somewhat  true  of  the  [low-caste]  women,  except  that  they  are  rather  the 
objects  of  the  gain  than  the  choosers,  though  it  is  a  fact  that  they  have  some 
degree  of  access  to  [high-caste]  men  as  well  as  to  the  men  of  their  own  caste. 
[Low-caste]  men  and  [high-caste]  women,  on  the  other  hand,  are  limited  to 
their  own  castes  in  sexual  choices.  (Dollard,  1957,  p.  135) 

The  Prestige  Gain 

High-caste  people  gain,  by  virtue  of  their  caste  status  alone,  def- 
erence from  others,  constant  reinforcement  of  a  feeling  of  superiority, 
and  a  permanent  scapegoat  group  in  the  form  of  the  lower  castes. 

The  gain  here  is  very  simple.  It  consists  in  the  fact  that  a  member  of  the 
[high]  caste  has  an  automatic  right  to  demand  forms  of  behavior  from  [low- 
caste  people]  which  serve  to  increase  his  own  self-esteem. 

It  must  always  be  remembered  that  in  the  end  this  deference  is  demanded 
and  not  merely  independently  given.  (Dollard,  1957,  p.  174) 

In  Sirkanda  relative  prestige  and  the  attendant  symbols  conform 
well  to  these  statements.  The  honorific  greeting  accorded  the  high 
castes  by  low  castes  has  been  mentioned  previously.  It  is  enforced  if 
it  is  not  volunteered.  A  respectful  form  of  address  and  reference  is  always 
expected  from  low  castes  by  high  castes.  The  continual  inflation  of 
high-caste  ego  is  emphasized  not  only  by  verbal  adulation  but  by 
other  symbolic  acts.  Low  castes  sit  lower  than  high  castes.  Normally 
they  also  remain  outside  high-caste  houses,  squatting  on  a  step  or 
doorsill  rather  than  entering.  On  the  other  hand,  the  high-caste  person 
can  enter  freely  into  the  house  of  the  low-caste  person.  Low  castes  step 
out  of  the  way  when  high  castes  pass  on  the  trail.  They  perform  small 
services  for  high-caste  members  upon  demand,  including  especially 
those  that  are  inconvenient,  risky,  dirty,  or  defiling.  They  are  expected 
to  live  in  inferior  dwellings,  use  inferior  utensils,  wear  inferior  clothes 
and  ornaments,  and  generally  play  the  role  demanded  by  their  in- 
ferior status.  They  must  follow  the  leadership  of  high-caste  people 
and  refrain  from  pressing  complaints.  They  must  accept  judgments 
handed  down  from  the  high  castes,  even  in  their  private  affairs,  in- 


INTERCASTE    RELATIONS  25  1 

eluding  the  punishment  or  abuse  that  often  accompanies  them.  They 
must  endure  quietly  many  kinds  of  impositions  upon  them,  including 
sexual  impositions  upon  their  women.  They  must  often  beg  payment 
for  their  labor  and  receive  it  humbly.  They  must  carefully  avoid 
high-caste  temples  and  be  ever  on  their  guard  not  to  defile  the  persons 
or  possessions  of  high-caste  people  according  to  the  traditional  rules 
governing  intercaste  contacts.  Powerful  sanctions — economic,  social, 
and  physical — are  at  hand  to  enforce  these  rules  and  are  not  used 
reluctantly.  Gould  (1961a,  pp.  946,  948)  cites  examples,  from  the  plains 
village  of  Sherupur,  of  fear  of  "rule  of  the  lower  orders"  as  high-caste 
villagers  saw  their  position  of  respect  being  undermined. 

The  whole  tenor  of  intercaste  relations  is  prescribed  by  custom. 
The  high-caste  person  is  paternalistic,  authoritarian.  The  low-caste 
person  is  submissive,  subservient.  He  must  not  pay  undue  attention 
to  high-caste  women.  He  should  be  indulgent  and  friendly  to  high- 
caste  children.  He  is  expected  to  be  respectful,  agreeable,  mildly 
humorous  in  the  presence  of  his  superiors.  He  must  laugh  at  jokes 
at  his  expense  and  conceal  resentment  if  he  feels  it.  He  must  know 
how  to  respond  with  just  the  right  note  of  humor  or  self-deprecation 
when  intercaste  relations  are  discussed  in  a  mixed-caste  group.  A  light 
remark  can  bring  an  ominous  response. 

In  Sirkanda  the  pride  of  high-caste  people  is  proverbial.  They  are 
quick  to  censure  the  low-caste  person  who  steps  out  of  line.  The  rules 
are  known  by  everyone,  but  a  misjudgment  by  a  low-caste  person  can 
lead  to  a  rebuke  or  physical  punishment.  When  a  Rajput  asked  me 
the  time,  using  an  honorific  form  of  address,  a  low-caste  man  made 
bold  to  look  at  his  tattoo-watch  (a  common  form  of  male  adornment) 
and  say  "4:30  by  my  watch."  The  questioner  shot  back  edgily, 
"Watches  sometimes  get  broken." 

In  general  the  impression  I  gained,  not  only  from  my  own  experi- 
ence but  from  that  of  the  schoolteacher  and  other  outsiders  in  the 
village,  was  that,  while  high-caste  villagers  feel  relatively  secure  in 
their  prestigeful  status  position  in  the  village,  they  feel  very  insecure 
in  the  presence  of  outsiders,  especially  non-Paharis.  This  is  doubtless 
related  to  self-consciousness  about  their  own  unorthodox  Hindu  prac- 
tices and  their  resultant  low  status  in  the  eyes  of  plains  people,  com- 
bined with  awareness  of  their  relatively  simple  or  primitive  living 
conditions,  clothing,  and  foods.  Their  insecurity  in  this  context  is 
revealed  in  self-conscious  jokes  about  their  being  "wild  men"  (un- 
domesticated),  being  destined  to  be  reborn  as  donkeys  on  the  plains, 
being  readily  identifiable  in  town  by  their  boorish  manners  and  rustic 
appearance  despite  efforts  to  appear  cosmopolitan,  and  the  like.  An- 


252  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

other  factor  may  be  their  awareness  of  government  efforts  to  raise 
the  status  and  living  conditions  of  low-caste  people.  For  these  reasons, 
among  others,  the  high  castes  show  extreme  reluctance  to  have  any- 
thing to  do  with  outsiders — to  feed  them,  talk  to  them,  or  even  offer 
them  a  seat  or  a  smoke.  After  he  had  been  in  the  village  three  months, 
the  schoolteacher  complained  that  no  one  had  invited  him  to  eat  and 
no  high-caste  person  had  even  inquired  as  to  his  origin  or  family 
status.  He  was  himself  a  Pahari  Rajput  from  a  neighboring  area.  Stories 
of  the  suspicious  and  inhospitable  nature  of  Paharis  are  many  and 
graphic.  To  the  extent  that  they  are  true,  they  seem  to  be  based 
largely  on  a  general  insecurity  in  the  presence  of  the  status  threat 
posed  by  strangers.  Any  stranger  is  an  unknown  quantity  who  may  be 
of  low-caste  or  alien  religion  and  hence  defiling.  He  may  be  an  advocate 
of  intercaste  equality  and  interaction.  Worse  yet,  he  might  try  to  put 
some  such  ideology  into  practice,  thereby  defiling  high  castes  or  putting 
ideas  into  the  minds  of  low  castes.  On  the  other  hand,  he  may  be  a 
high-caste  Hindu  and  hence  be  critical  or  contemptuous  of  unorthodox 
claimants  to  high  status. 

Also  of  fundamental  significance  is  the  fact  that  this  is  an  isolated 
and  relatively  closed  social  system  where  kin,  caste,  and  community 
ties  are  extremely  important.  Anyone  who  lacks  these  familiar  ties 
is  outside  the  system  and  cannot  be  placed  within  it  readily  if  at  all. 
Such  a  person  poses  an  inherent  threat  to  the  community.  Therefore, 
the  best  way  to  handle  him  is  to  get  rid  of  him,  or,  if  that  cannot 
be  done  quickly,  to  ignore  him.  If  he  remains  he  will  gradually  come 
to  be  accepted  as  an  outsider  who  is  resident  in  the  village,  tolerated 
but  ignored  except  in  the  context  of  his  legitimate  function  in  the 
village.  Fear  of  outside  agents  of  authority  also  leads  to  rejection  or 
avoidance  of  strangers. 

Low-caste  people  are  often  more  relaxed  than  are  those  of  high 
caste  in  the  presence  of  outsiders.  Evidently  they  have  little  to  fear 
and  nothing  to  lose  in  terms  of  status.  They  are  often  used  by  high- 
caste  people,  perhaps  for  this  reason,  to  deal  with  strangers.  This 
aggravates  intercaste  tensions  because  low-caste  people  come  to  know 
outsiders  (the  schoolteacher,  the  village  level  worker,  the  anthro- 
pologist) better  than  do  high-caste  people.  They  learn  more  of  the 
ways  of  outsiders,  become  accustomed  to  being  with  them,  and  even 
acquire  habits  and  ideas  from  them.  The  high-caste  people  fear  what 
may  be  passing  between  the  local  untouchables  and  the  potentially 
threatening  outsider,  and  dread  that  they  will  be  "found  out,"  ridi- 
culed, and  hence  lose  status.  They  therefore  try  to  get  rid  of  outsiders 
if  possible,  or  keep  them  away  from  close  contacts  with  villagers. 


NTERCASTE  RELATIONS  253 

Middle-aged  high-caste  men  are  especially  sensitive  on  this  point. 
3nly  when  they  are  secure  in  the  knowledge  that  their  status  and 
mportance  are  recognized  and  properly  appreciated  do  they  relax 
heir  pose.  On  the  other  hand,  it  is  not  a  matter  of  consciously  striving 
'or  prestige  and  deference.  These  are  considered  to  be  natural  and 
ust  concomitants  of  caste  status.  When  infractions  of  rules  of  inter- 
:aste  relations  are  brought  to  the  notice  of  these  men,  they  usually 
ittribute  them  to  outside  influence  or  general  deterioration  from  the 
golden  age  of  amicable  intercaste  relations — a  period  in  the  indefinite 
3ast  when  the  low  castes  knew  their  place  and  the  high  castes  were 
ible  to  play  their  paternalistic  role  to  best  advantage. 

Compensatory  gains  of  low-caste  people  are  few  in  the  social  sphere, 
rhey  strive  to  maintain  status  superiority  to  one  or  more  castes  which 
hey  consider  lower  than  themselves.  Their  only  direct  gain  is  in 
dative  freedom  from  ritual  and  status  restrictions.  In  the  hills,  this 
loes  not  result  in  important  advantages  for  low  castes  because  all 
:astes  are  relatively  unorthodox.  In  the  plains  the  demands  of  ritual 
jurity  and  social  distance  on  high  castes  are  considerably  stricter, 
particularly  in  such  matters  as  the  seclusion  of  women,  continence 
)f  widows,  abstinence  from  liquor  and  meat,  and  so  on.  There  low 
:astes  can  ignore  these  prohibitions  while  high  castes  must  adhere  to 
hem,  at  least  in  public.  In  Sirkanda  the  primary  advantage  to  low- 
:aste  people  is  in  their  prerogative  to  largely  ignore  prestige  con- 
iderations  in  their  daily  life  and  live  with  relative  freedom  from  fear 
)f  loss  of  a  respect  they  do  not  have. 

Ultimate  Rewards  as  Gains 

High-caste  people  feel  that  they  are  justified  in  demanding  respect 
ind  service  from  their  caste  inferiors,  as  the  direct  result  of  their  own 
neritorious  acts  in  previous  lives.  But  the  matter  does  not  end  there. 
\ccording  to  the  conventional  Hindu  view  they  are  destined,  by  the 
'act  that  they  play  their  high-caste  role  well,  to  reap  further  and  even 
nore  desirable  rewards  in  subsequent  lives.  In  turn,  low-caste  people 
:an  hope  to  improve  their  lot  by  submitting  to  their  fate  as  disad- 
vantaged people.  Weber  (1958,  p.  122)  points  out  that  "the  neglect  of 
me's  caste  duties  out  of  high  pretensions  unfailingly  is  disadvantageous 
n  the  present  or  future  life."  In  the  orthodox  Hindu  view,  high  castes 
:an  increase  their  chances  for  ultimate  rewards  by  increasing  the 
economic  and  prestige  advantages  they  seek  in  this  life,  while  low 
:astes  can  increase  their  chances  for  ultimate  rewards  by  subordinating 
economic  and  prestige  gains  in  this  life  to  the  cause  of  pursuing  their 
:aste  duty,  including  the  serving  and  honoring  of  high  castes.  Thus, 


254  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

immediate  and  ultimate  rewards  are  consistent  in  the  behavior  they 
require  of  high-caste  people  but  contradictory  in  the  behavior  they 
require  of  low-caste  people. 

In  Sirkanda  this  view  is  held  primarily  by  educated,  high-caste  men. 
Orthodox  Hindu  views  of  caste  duty,  as  such,  are  not  held  by  most 
villagers.  However,  it  is  believed  that  by  living  a  good  life  and  giving 
charity  a  person  can  enhance  his  caste  status  in  the  next  life.  The 
opportunities  for  low  castes  in  the  next  life  are  less  than  those  for 
high  castes  simply  because  the  next  step  for  them  is  not  as  high  as 
that  for  high  castes.  Moreover,  the  economic  advantages  possessed  by 
high  castes  enable  them  to  give  more  charity  at  less  personal  sacrifice 
than  can  low  castes,  thus  furthering  their  prospects  for  ultimate 
rewards. 

Maintenance  of  the  System 

The  caste  system  is  maintained  by  caste  stereotypes  and  by  religio- 
philosophical  beliefs  relating  to  fate  and  proper  behavior.  Many  vivid 
stories  are  told  of  the  wonderful  results  of  living  a  good  life  and  the 
dire  results  of  improper  behavior.  Low-  and  high-caste  status  is  rational- 
ized and  justified,  both  on  caste  and  individual  levels,  as  described 
above.  More  immediately  and  practically,  proper  caste  behavior  is 
enforced  on  the  low  castes  by  high  castes  and  on  all  people  by  their 
caste-fellows,  through  social  and  economic  pressure  and  physical  force. 
The  actions  of  individuals  are  likely  to  have  results  which  affect  the 
entire  caste.  A  high-caste  person  who  pollutes  himself  endangers 
the  status  of  others  of  his  caste;  a  low-caste  person  who  angers  a  high- 
caste  person  may  bring  retribution  to  his  caste.  Sanctions  are  most 
conspicuously  applied,  however,  across  caste  lines.  A  recalcitrant  Dom 
can  be  readily  taken  care  of  through  economic  pressures  (such  as  non- 
payment), by  physical  violence  or  threats  thereof,  by  expulsion  from 
the  village,  or  by  legal  action  (wherein  high  castes  can  control  the 
decisions  through  superior  wealth  and  judicious  use  of  bribes). 

To  the  present,  low  castes  in  Sirkanda  have  made  no  concerted  effort 
to  break  out  of  their  status  as  a  group,  nor  is  it  likely  that  they  will 
do  so.  Particular  castes  or  individuals  have  made  brief  sallies  in  this 
direction  but  nothing  more.  Relative  caste  status  remains  quite  stable. 
A  certain  flexibility  among  younger  and  older  high-caste  men,  com- 
bined with  a  fair  degree  of  realistic  tact  on  the  part  of  low-caste 
people,  has  prevented  open  conflict.  Many  low-caste  members  have 
thought  out  rationalizations  which  make  acceptance  of  their  status 
easier.  One  Bajgi  said: 


INTERCASTE  RELATIONS  255 

We  actually  are  better  off  than  the  high  castes  in  some  ways.  When  they 
want  work  done,  they  have  to  come  ask  us  and  we  can  refuse  if  we  are  too 
busy.  They  have  to  give  us  grain  or  money  periodically.  When  we  need  help 
in  doing  our  work  we  get  high-caste  people  to  do  it  and  they  follow  our 
instructions. 

A  blacksmith  said: 

Anyone  who  serves  another  is  a  slave  regardless  of  his  position  because 
he  does  not  determine  his  own  action.  In  that  respect  we  are  no  worse  off 
than  many  people  who  are  wealthy  and  respected.  The  district  magistrate, 
the  schoolteacher,  the  surveyor — they  are  servants  just  as  surely  as  are  their 
peons  or  we  blacksmiths.  The  district  magistrate  has  a  great  deal  of  power. 
He  can  collect  fines  and  send  people  to  prison  whether  they  are  poor  or 
wealthy,  strong  or  weak.  Therefore  he  is  greatly  feared.  However,  even  he 
can  do  only  what  the  law  says.  He  is  not  to  be  feared  as  a  person  because 
he  only  implements  the  law.  He  has  no  power  beyond  what  the  law  gives 
him  and  he  can  harm  no  man  who  has  not  disobeyed  the  law.  He  can  give 
no  punishment  not  written  in  the  law.  Therefore  he  is  just  a  servant  of  the 
law  like  any  other  servant  of  a  master.  This  is  true  of  many  positions.  All 
of  us  who  work  for  others  are  servants. 

The  methods  which  low-caste  people  adopt  in  accommodating  to 
their  depressed  status  are  similar  to  those  reported  by  Dollard  (1957,  p. 
253)  for  Negroes  in  Southerntown.  In  Sirkanda  the  most  common  reac- 
tion is  adoption  of  attitudes  of  passive  accommodation  and  acceptance 
of  gratifications  commensurate  with  low-caste  status.  Overt  aggression 
is  rare,  though  not  unknown.  More  characteristic  of  the  plains  and 
particularly  of  urban  areas  than  of  the  hills  is  competition  by  low- 
caste  members  for  high-caste  values  and  increased  status  (cf.  Bailey, 
1957,  pp.  186  ff.;  Cohn,  1955;  Opler  and  R.  Singh,  1948,  p.  476;  Rowe, 
1960a,  pp.  58  ff.,  298  ff.).  In  Sirkanda  low-caste  members  characteris- 
tically turn  their  aggressive  impulses  toward  members  of  their  own 
group.  They  are  explicitly  encouraged  in  this  by  high-caste  members. 
Overt  aggression  by  low  castes  in  Sirkanda  (fights,  cases  referred  to 
council  action,  and  even  legal  suits)  is  almost  exclusively  directed 
toward  caste-fellows  or  members  of  castes  of  roughly  equivalent  status, 
often  with  high-caste  support. 

Tension  between  high  and  low  castes  is  not  lacking  but  is  usually 
kept  on  the  covert  level.  It  is  based  on  the  dominance  of  high  castes 
in  all  spheres  of  life,  which  results  in  differential  availability  of  ad- 
vantages, primarily  economic  and  prestige  advantages.  K.  Singh,  in  a 
study  of  intercaste  tensions  in  two  plains  villages,  found  essentially 
the  same  situation  as  that  in  Sirkanda,  but  with  overt  tensions  and 


256  INTERCASTE  RELATIONS 

resultant  conflict  evidently  considerably  further  developed.  Speaking 
of  these  tensions  he  states: 

The  major  conflict  in  both  villages  was  found  to  be  between  the  Thakurs 
on  one  side  and  the  low  castes  on  the  other.  The  conflict  between  castes  in 
the  two  villages  seems  to  lie  in  the  attempts  of  the  low-caste  people  to  estab- 
lish autonomy  from  Thakur  domination  and  to  reduce  the  extent  of  their 
dependence  upon  them.  Almost  in  its  entirety,  low-caste  tension  may  be  seen 
in  terms  of  their  desire  to  assert  their  independence,  on  the  one  hand,  and 
their  inability  to  do  so  on  the  other. 

...  As  dependence  decreases  tension  is  also  seen  to  decrease.  (K.  Singh, 
1957,  pp.  183  f.) 

If  the  low  castes  are  to  decrease  their  dependence  in  Sirkanda,  they 
must  have  access  to  more  land.  At  present  this  is  an  issue  on  which  the 
high  castes  are  in  no  mood  to  conciliate  and  on  which  the  low  castes 
are  in  no  position  to  press  demands. 


Caste  Trends 

Sanskritization  in  relation  to  caste  has  been  discussed  in  chapter 
4.  There  it  was  noted  that  a  trend  toward  adoption  of  the  orthodox 
Hindu  usage  of  the  plains  is  occurring  among  all  castes  in  Sirkanda 
as  compared  to  the  dual  trend  toward  low-caste  Sanskritization  and 
high-caste  urbanization  (or  what  might  be  called  "atraditionalism") 
in  the  plains  reported  by  Srinivas,  Cohn,  and  others.  The  high  castes 
of  Sirkanda  have  adopted  somewhat  more  of  the  orthodox  traits  than 
have  the  low  castes,  but  this  difference  seems  to  be  more  a  result  of 
their  economic  ability  than  of  differential  aspirations.  In  Sirkanda 
there  is  relatively  little  evidence  that  any  one  caste  is  making  an 
organized  effort  to  raise  its  status  in  the  system.  The  most  conspicuous 
effort  has  been  that  of  the  Bajgis,  whose  women  have  ceased  to  dance 
professionally.  A  similar  effort  was  underway  in  the  Bhatbair  Beda 
caste.  The  status  rivalry,  and  its  behavioral  ramifications,  among  black- 
smiths and  Bajgis  is  another  approach  to  mobility,  but  it  lacks  organ- 
ization or  consistency,  and  does  not  affect  other  castes. 

Therefore,  low  castes  are  anxious  to  rise  in  status,  but  they  seldom 
see  any  way  to  do  it.  They  feel  that  they  are  subject  to  the  will  of 
high  castes  who  would  never  tolerate  infringement  upon  their  superior 
status.  Moreover,  the  low  castes  are  small  in  numbers  and  divided 
among  themselves  by  the  jealousies  inherent  in  a  competitive  situ- 
ation, such  as  that  with  which  households  in  the  same  occupational 
specialty  are  faced.  As  Cohn  (1955,  p.  74)  has  pointed  out,  mobility 
in  a  caste  system  must  be  a  group  phenomenon.  So  far,  group  effort  in 


NTERCASTE  RELATIONS  257 

his  direction  on  the  low-caste  level  has  been  largely  lacking  in 
iirkanda.  Low  castes  realize  that  any  organized  effort  to  raise  their 
iwn  status,  even  if  it  could  be  undertaken,  would  meet  with  bitter 
md  powerful  opposition  by  the  high  castes.  The  high  castes  prefer  to 
leal  with  low-caste  people  as  dependent  individuals.  Organized  op- 
)Osition  is  a  much  greater  threat  than  individual  opposition. 

On  a  broader  level,  trends  in  Pahari  culture  as  a  whole  have  brought 
:hanges  in  behavior  and  perhaps  some  enhancement  in  the  status  of 
he  people  of  this  culture  area  relative  to  those  of  the  neighboring 
jlains.  This,  at  least,  is  the  goal  of  changes  in  ritual  usages  among 
?aharis,  and  especially  among  people  of  high  caste.  Elsewhere  this 
,roal  has  been  referred  to  as  "plainsward  mobility"  (Berreman,  1961b). 

Caste  is  not  a  static  phenomenon.  Not  only  are  relative  caste  status 
ind  the  attendant  caste  rules  in  constant  flux,  but  the  caste  system 
tself  assumes  new  and  varying  significance  under  changing  circum- 
itances.  The  accommodations,  alterations,  and  new  functions  of  caste 
n  nontraditional  settings  have  been  discussed  at  some  length  by  several 
mthors  (cf.  Bose,  1958;  Gadgil,  1952,  pp.  184  ff.;  Niehoff,  1959;  Olcott, 
1944;  O'Malley,  1932,  pp.  161  ff.;  Ryan,  1953,  pp.  307  ff.;  Srinivas, 
1955a,  1957).  In  these  accounts  emphasis  is  placed  upon  the  functions 
}f  caste  in  the  newly  relevant  political  arena.  Political  consciousness 
ind  participation  began  to  spread  widely  in  India  only  shortly  before 
Independence.  Caste  has  arisen  as  a  vital  unit  in  national  and  regional, 
is  well  as  local,  politics.  In  Sirkanda  these  changes  have  not  yet  be- 
come apparent.  While  Sirkanda  people  have  voted  both  in  local  and 
national  elections,  there  has  been  no  caste  alignment  evident  in  the 
elections.  The  low  castes  do  not  see  the  vote  as  a  means  to  obtain 
desired  ends.  To  put  up  a  low-caste  candidate  never  occurred  to 
Sirkanda  Doms,  and  when  an  outsider  suggested  it  the  idea  was  dis- 
missed as  useless  and  likely  to  cause  trouble.  Doms  are  so  outnumbered 
that  their  attitude  is  realistic.  They  are  cynical  about  the  reservation 
of  a  seat  for  untouchables  on  the  village  council.  While  it  is  good  in 
principle,  it  is  an  empty  gesture  in  practice,  because  one  low-caste 
man  has  little  influence  in  such  a  body.  Doms  are  pleased  that  school- 
ing is  equally  available  to  all  in  the  village  and  that  scholarships  to 
higher  schools  are  available  for  untouchables,  but  no  one  plans  to 
make  use  of  the  latter  provision  simply  because  it  is  too  far  from  the 
realities  of  village  life.  Therefore,  caste  has  not  become  a  divisive 
factor  in  recent  years  as  it  reportedly  has  in  other  areas.  Srinivas,  who 
has  discussed  the  increasingly  divisive  nature  of  caste  in  the  villages 
and  the  nation,  has  also  emphasized  the  "bonds  opposing  the  divisive- 
ness  of  caste,"  the  "links  that  bind  together  the  members  of  different 


258  INTERCASTE    RELATIONS 

castes  who  inhabit  a  village  or  a  small  local  area"  (Srinivas,  1955b,  pp. 
32,  34).  In  Sirkanda  it  is  true,  to  a  significantly  lesser  extent  than  in 
the  villages  studied  by  Lewis  and  by  Srinivas,  that  caste  is  "...  a 
distinct  ethnic  group  with  its  own  history,  traditions,  and  identifica- 
tions, and  [that]  each  caste  lives  in  more  or  less  separate  quarters  in 
the  village"  (Lewis,  1958,  p.  314).  In  Sirkanda  the  numbers  of  in- 
dividuals in  all  castes  except  Rajputs  are  too  small  to  function  as 
separate  little  communities.  Nevertheless,  in  Sirkanda  caste  per  se  is 
divisive — it  frequently  turns  the  attention  and  loyalties  of  everyone 
but  Rajputs  to  the  world  outside  the  village  and  toward  the  caste 
brotherhood.  Caste  creates  intergroup  friction  within  the  village  and 
often  prevents  common  purpose.  However,  caste  organization  entails 
economic  and  ritual  interdependence,  and  associated  with  it  in  the 
village  context  is  social  interdependence.  In  the  following  chapter 
factors  contributing  to  village  unity  and  cohesion  will  be  discussed. 
These  are  the  factors  which  override  intracaste  identification  and  inter- 
caste  friction  to  make  the  village  community  a  functioning  social, 
economic,  and  religious  unit  within  the  larger  field  of  its  extensions 
in  surrounding  villages  and  its  relationship  to  larger  social,  economic, 
and  administrative  units. 


8 


THE   VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 


"From  time  immemorial  the  village  has  been  a  basic  and  important 
unit  in  the  organization  of  Indian  social  polity"  (Dube,  1955,  p.  1).  As 
such,  villages  are  useful  units  for  anthropological  analysis  (cf.  Bailey, 
1959).  In  fact,  I  would  maintain  that  in  the  area  in  which  this  study 
was  carried  out,  the  community  is  the  most  relevant  manageable  unit 
of  analysis  if  one's  aim  is  to  achieve  an  over-all  understanding  of  the 
way  of  life  of  the  people  in  a  limited  time.  Detailed  studies  of  an 
entire  region  would  be  impossible.  Studies  of  kin  and  caste  groups 
would  be  fruitful,  but  in  a  different  direction. 

Like  all  Indian  villages,  Pahari  villages  are  not  static,  isolated,  or 
autonomous.  To  be  understood  they  must  be  viewed  in  historical 
perspective  and  in  their  relationship  to  other  social,  political,  eco- 
nomic, and  religious  systems  of  which  they  or  some  of  their  members 
are  a  part.  The  nature  and  extent  of  these  larger  systems  must  be 
determined  empirically.  "Like  any  unit  in  a  segmentary  social  system, 
the  Indian  village  has  to  be  examined  to  determine  in  what  respects 
it  stands  alone  and  parallels  for  its  members  the  advantages  and  pur- 
poses of  similar  units,  and  in  what  respects  it  combines  in  various  ways 
with  other  units  to  serve  wider  purposes"  (Opler,  1956,  p.  10). 

SlRKANDA   AS   A    COMMUNITY 

Sirkanda  is  readily  identifiable  as  a  village  community.  It  is  named, 
and  it  is  called  a  village  (gabri)  by  its  residents  and  by  others  familiar 


26o  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

with  it.  Village  affiliation  of  individuals  is  widely  recognized  in  this 
area  by  people  of  other  villages  as  well  as  by  fellow  villagers.  There 
is  village  loyalty  and,  in  some  contexts,  rivalry  between  villages.  There 
are  stereotypes  about  villages  as  entities,  as  in  the  local  saying,  "Two 
things  to  be  wary  of  are  Sirkanda's  rocks  and  Kanda's  women." 
Travelers  on  the  trail  invariably  inquire  as  to  one  another's  village 
of  origin  and  the  villages  of  their  departure  and  destination.  People 
are  often  identified  in  conversation  by  personal  name,  caste,  and 
village.  The  villages  of  origin  of  brides  brought  in  from  outside  are 
long  remembered. 

As  has  been  mentioned,  slightly  over  half  of  all  Sirkanda  villagers 
(206  of  384)  live  outside  the  nucleated  settlement  area  which  com- 
prises the  village,  and  yet  their  affiliation  with  it — resulting  from  their 
origin,  family  ties,  and  property  owned  in  the  village — is  not  ques- 
tioned. The  focus  of  community  identification  is,  therefore,  the  well- 
defined  nucleated  settlement  area  containing  dwellings  and  sur- 
rounded by  cultivated  lands.  People  who  identify  with  this  settlement 
rather  than  with  other  similar  settlements  are  members  of  this  village. 
Whether  or  not  they  usually  live  in  the  settlement,  it  is  the  focus  of 
their  religious  activity  and  much  of  their  social  and  economic  activity, 
and  it  is  the  location  of  traditional  family  lands  and  dwellings.  The 
village  is  therefore  unquestionably  a  real,  functioning  social  entity 
of  great  importance  to  its  members  and  to  others  who  come  into 
contact  with  its  members. 

Economic  and  religious  functions  of  the  community  and  its  rela- 
tionship to  other  communities,  towns,  and  regions  in  these  matters 
have  been  presented  in  chapters  2,  3,  and  4.  Kinship  and  caste  as  they 
function  within  and  beyond  community  boundaries  and  as  they  affect 
community  organization  have  been  discussed  in  chapters  5,  6,  and  7.  In 
this  and  the  following  chapters  it  will  be  my  purpose  to  comment 
further  on  the  village  community  of  Sirkanda  as  a  social  and  ad- 
ministrative entity.  The  village  will  be  examined  in  terms  of  both 
its  internal  organization — the  relations  of  various  groups  and  cate- 
gories within  the  village — and  its  relations  with,  and  inclusion  within, 
entities  external  to  it. 

Interaction  by  Age  and  Sex 

Relationships  between  individuals  within  kin  groups  as  influenced 
by  age,  generation,  and  sex  have  been  discussed  in  chapter  5.  Age  and 
sex  have  a  similar  importance  in  the  relationship  of  individuals  un- 
related by  kin  ties:  Males  almost  always  dominate  over  females;  age 


THE   VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  26 1 

dominates  youth.  Women  are  usually  more  relaxed  and  sociable  among 
women  than  in  the  presence  of  men;  young  peoples'  behavior  is  in- 
hibited by  the  presence  of  elders.  Women  and  young  people  are 
especially  careful  of  their  behavior  in  the  presence  of  outsiders  or 
members  of  other  villages. 

A  recurrent  situation  in  which  these  relationships  were  clearly  mani- 
fested was  that  presented  early  in  the  period  of  this  research  when 
the  anthropologist  wished  to  secure  photographs.  Young  men  were 
almost  invariably  willing  to  be  photographed  when  alone  or  in  the 
presence  of  age-mates.  In  the  presence  of  male  elders  they  would 
usually  await  an  indication  of  approval  from  the  elders.  With  women 
the  situation  was  even  clearer.  A  young  woman  would  refuse  to  be 
photographed  if  she  were  in  the  presence  of  either  men  or  older  women 
unless  she  received  specific  encouragement  from  them.  With  a  word 
of  encouragement  from  males  or  elders  (or  in  their  absence)  a  woman 
was  as  eager  to  be  photographed  as  was  a  man. 

Ideally  a  male  dominates  even  an  older  female,  but  this  does  not 
always  work  out  in  practice.  An  elderly  woman  can  persuade  a  young 
man  to  allow  his  wife  to  be  photographed.  At  the  Bhatbair  fair,  an 
intervillage  function,  a  group  of  gaily  dressed  young  women  of  various 
villages  agreed  to  be  photographed  until  a  proud,  middle-aged,  and 
inebriated  Brahmin  man  stormed  up  and  ordered  them  to  refuse.  An 
elderly,  high-status  Rajput  woman  of  Sirkanda  who  knew  the  photog- 
rapher, as  the  Brahmin  did  not,  and  who  had  been  observing  the 
proceedings,  was  obviously  irritated  by  the  arrogant  intervention. 
She  interceded  by  stepping  to  the  center  of  the  group  of  girls.  Eyeing 
the  Brahmin  evenly,  she  said,  "Please  take  my  photograph."  Her  age, 
status,  and  composure  were  sufficient  to  abash  the  Brahmin,  who  left, 
and  to  encourage  the  women,  who  posed  willingly  for  the  picture. 

Within  the  village  there  is  great  freedom  in  the  relations  among 
men  and  women.  They  work,  travel,  and  participate  in  village  func- 
tions together.  Women  do  not  leave  the  village  in  marriage  parties  or 
other  such  functions,  but  in  the  village  they  participate  freely.  No- 
where is  this  more  evident  than  in  drinking  and  dancing  parties 
where,  especially  if  outsiders  are  not  present,  women  often  participate 
with  their  menfolk.  At  public  feasts  women  often  eat  with  men. 
Evidently  in  villages  more  remote  than  Sirkanda  such  participation 
is  even  freer;  Sirkanda  has  felt,  to  some  extent,  the  effects  of  plains 
customs  on  this  score.  Such  behavior  is  significant  as  one  aspect  of 
informal  community  organization. 

Freedom  in  sexual  behavior  has  been  discussed  in  chapter  5,  where 
it  was  emphasized  that  both  men  and  women  commonly  engage  in 


262  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

extramarital  sexual  relations.  Men  have  especially  free  access  to 
women  of  lower  caste  than  themselves  and  to  the  wives  of  their 
brothers.  Women  visiting  in  their  natal  villages  are  also  unusually 
free.  Much  of  the  conversation  of  young  men  is  devoted  to  their 
sexual  exploits,  a  topic  upon  which  immoderate  boasting  is  not  un- 
common. At  fairs  and  other  celebrations  sexual  activity  accompanies 
drinking  and  dancing  as  a  source  of  diversion.  An  ideal  of  romantic 
love  pervades  the  culture,  expressed  in  stories  and  songs,  and  realized, 
with  greater  frequency  than  seems  usual  in  most  of  India,  through 
elopement  and  extramarital  liaisons.  Pahari  songs  generally  recount 
tales  of  romantic  love  or  of  heroism.  The  most  popular  type  of  song 
can  best  be  described  by  quoting  Traill  (1828,  p.  219): 

The  Byri,  or  Bhagnaol,  is  a  species  of  duet,  sung  commonly  by  a  male  and 
a  female,  who  respond  to  each  other  in  extemporary  stanzas  alternately.  The 
subject  has  commonly  reference  to  the  situation  or  actual  occupation  of  the 
parties,  clothed  in  numerous  metaphors  and  similes,  drawn  chiefly  from 
vegetable  products;  where  the  parties  are  skillful,  the  Byri  is  made  the 
vehicle  of  personal  praise  or  satire:  this  style  of  singing  is  highly  popular 
in  the  Kamaon  pergunnahs,  and  it  is  there  a  common  saying,  that  no  female 
heart  can  withstand  the  seductions  of  an  accomplished  Byri  singer.  The 
measure  is  slow  and  plaintive. 

The  haunting  melodies  of  these  songs,  as  verses  are  exchanged  be- 
tween young  men  and  women  working  out  of  sight  but  within  earshot 
of  one  another  on  the  steep,  forest-covered  hillsides,  no  passer-by  can 
easily  forget.  Such  singing  is  a  means  of  maintaining  contact  and 
finding  reassurance  in  lonely  work  in  isolated  areas,  as  well  as  a  vehicle 
for  indicating  romantic  interest  and  exercising  creative  wit. 


Caste  and  Community 

Caste  has  been  presented  in  the  preceding  chapter  as  a  primarily 
divisive  force  in  the  village.  However,  it  is  worth  emphasizing  again 
that  this  is  only  part  of  the  picture.  The  nature  of  caste  in  this  area 
creates  economic  and  religious  interdependence  in  the  village.  Every 
local  caste  is  essential  to  every  other,  and,  to  the  extent  that  people 
depend  upon  members  of  other  castes  within  the  village,  a  strong 
cohesive  bond  is  formed.  From  such  interdependence  and  from  the 
crucial  fact  of  residential  proximity,  intercaste  social  bonds  also  grow 
to  be  effective  cohesive  forces.  There  is  certain  lore  about  the  village, 
its  locale  and  people,  which  is  shared  almost  exclusively  among  vil- 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  263 

lagers  without  regard  to  castes  and  cliques.  There  are  common  atti- 
tudes on  many  subjects.  There  is  an  essentially  common  body  of 
religious  belief  and  behavior.  These  common  understandings  help 
tie  village  members  together. 

Participation  in  common  enterprises,  ownership  of  common  prop- 
erty, and  preoccupation  with  common  problems  and  common  antag- 
onisms further  bind  the  community  together  despite  caste,  sib,  and 
clique  alignments.  Community  members  participate  in  annual  cere- 
monies, ritual  observances,  and  informal  drinking,  dancing,  and  sing- 
ing parties.  Cooperative  work  on  village-owned  trails,  on  the  water 
source,  and  in  certain  phases  of  housebuilding  and  agriculture  also 
contribute  to  community  identification.  Indicative  of  a  degree  of 
village  unity  and  interdependence  is  ownership  by  the  village  in  com- 
mon of  large  cooking  vessels  and  a  few  large  tools  available  to  all 
community  members  as  needed.  Community  government  (discussed 
below)  and  informal  councils  are  enterprises  cutting  across  divisive 
loyalties,  though  they  also  provide  a  setting  for  engaging  in  disputes. 
Common  loyalties  are  shared  by  villagers  in  their  identification  of 
themselves  as  Sirkanda  villagers.  They  share  pride  in  village  history, 
its  former  relationship  with  the  Garhwal  Raja,  and  in  him  and  his 
kingdom. 

Common  problems  and  antagonisms  are  found  in  uniform  dislike 
of  the  present  government,  its  programs  and  personnel.  No  faction 
deviates  on  this  matter.  Rivalry  with  other  villages  and  areas,  and 
feelings  of  strangeness  in  alien  settings,  serve  also  to  bind  people  to- 
gether before  strangers.  Village-wide  suspicion  of  outsiders  has  a 
similar  effect.  Certain  village  secrets  are  kept  by  all  factions.  Caste 
may  have  a  counterfactional  function  in  that  cross-caste  antagonisms 
make  for  occasional  cross-factional  alliances  within  castes,  especially 
in  disputes  with  caste  or  status  implications. 

Therefore,  in  spite  of  the  many  cleavages  and  potential  cleavages 
in  the  village,  there  are  counterforces  which  make  it  a  real  community 
— an  identification  group  as  well  as  a  membership  group.  Srinivas 
(1955b,  p.  35)  has  said  that  in  Mysore,  "the  village  is  a  community 
which  commands  loyalty  from  all  who  live  in  it,  irrespective  of  caste 
affiliation.  Some  are  first-class  members  of  the  village  community,  and 
others  are  second-class  members,  but  all  are  members."  This  is  true 
too  in  Sirkanda.  The  village  is  thus  enabled  to  survive  as  a  unity,  to 
maintain  conventional  understandings  about  behavior,  and  to  deal 
with  deviants  effectively. 


264  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 


Village  Exogamy 

An  outstanding  feature  of  Sirkanda  as  a  community,  in  contrast 
to  many  plains  communities,  is  the  absence  of  village  exogamy  (Berre- 
man,  ig62d;  cf.  Gould,  1960,  1961b).  This  is  important  in  community 
consensus  and  cohesion  in  that  intravillage  marriages  create  strong 
ties  across  cleavages  of  sib,  clan,  and  clique.  Lewis  (1958,  p.  325)  has 
emphasized  the  importance  of  rules  of  village  endogamy  and  exogamy 
in  the  world  view  of  those  who  live  under  them;  they  are  "so  im- 
portant that  it  might  be  useful  to  add  endogamy  and  exogamy  as 
crucial  universal  variables  in  our  models  of  the  folk  society  and  peasant 
society." 

Despite  absence  of  formal  exogamy  in  Sirkanda,  in  84  per  cent  of 
all  marriages  the  wife  comes  from  outside  the  village.  In  the  minority 
castes  (that  is,  all  but  Rajputs)  all  wives  come  from  other  villages 
due  to  sib  exogamy.  However,  the  "region  whose  limits  are  determined 
by  kinship  bonds"  is  relatively  small  in  the  hills  as  compared  with 
the  plains.  In  Sirkanda,  83  per  cent  of  all  spouses  come  from  within 
four  air  miles  of  Sirkanda. 

To  the  extent  that  Sirkanda  marriages  are  contracted  within  a 
small  area  and  with  relatively  few  families,  most  of  whose  members 
are  personally  known  to  Sirkanda  villagers,  Sirkanda  presents  a  con- 
trast to  Rampur,  as  reported  by  Lewis,  and  to  similar  plains  villages. 
The  area  of  "rural  cosmopolitanism"  surrounding  the  village,  which 
Lewis  found  to  be  so  extensive  around  Rampur,  is  relatively  restricted 
in  the  hills.  There  is  a  very  real  "isolationist"  and  "inward-looking" 
tendency  among  residents  of  Sirkanda  and  neighboring  communities. 
This  isolationism  occurs  not  at  the  village  level,  as  it  would  in  en- 
dogamous  villages,  but  at  the  level  of  the  immediate  cultural  area — 
the  area  of  the  marriage  network.  There  is  not,  therefore,  sufficient 
contrast  between  exogamous  Rampur  and  nonexogamous  Sirkanda  to 
test  Lewis'  ideas  rigorously. 

A  contrast  between  Sirkanda  and  Rampur,  which  may  be  partially 
attributable  to  the  difference  in  marriage  rules,  is  the  apparently  greater 
flexibility,  changeability,  and  ambiguity  in  factional  alignment  in 
Sirkanda  (Lewis,  1958,  p.  114).  This  probably  stems  in  part  from  the 
incidence  of  in-village,  cross-sib,  and  hence  often  cross-faction  marriage 
in  Sirkanda.  The  extreme  suspiciousness  which  Sirkanda  residents 
display  toward  outsiders  mav  be  partlv  attributable  to  the  relatively 
small,  well-known  group  of  people  with  whom  marriages  are  con- 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  265 

traded  and  other  intercommunity  relations  occur.  However,  most  dif- 
ferences which  appear  between  villages  of  the  hills  and  of  the  plains 
are  more  plausibly  attributable  to  other  cultural  and  ecological  factors. 


Cliques  and  Factions 

The  most  prominent  social  units  within  Sirkanda  are  those  based 
upon  considerations  of  kin  and  caste  ties.  These  have  been  discussed 
in  previous  chapters.  However,  there  are  other  relationships  among 
individuals  and  groups  which  are  significant  to  life  in  the  community 
although  they  are  not  coextensive  with  these  units.  Primary  among 
these  are  informal  alliances  and  friendships  which  go  to  make  up 
cliques  or  factions  of  individuals  who  tend  to  help  one  another  in 
economic  and  religious  undertakings,  to  interact  with  one  another 
more  frequently  than  with  others  in  social  relations,  and  to  support 
one  another  in  rivalry  or  disputes  with  others  in  or  out  of  the  village. 
In  Sirkanda  these  are  not  powerful,  stable,  well-delineated  factions 
which  consistently  oppose  one  another  and  command  the  loyalty  of 
their  members,  as  are  those  reported  by  Lewis  (1958,  p.  114)  for 
Rampur.  Rather  they  are  often  vague,  shifting,  uncoordinated  groups 
of  people.  It  therefore  seems  preferable  in  most  contexts  to  call  such 
alliances  in  Sirkanda  "cliques"  in  translation  of  the  villagers'  own 
term,  gutt.  The  term  "faction"  will  be  used  in  this  presentation  to 
refer  to  groups  involved  in  disputes.  No  rigid  terminological  distinc- 
tion is  advocated  here.  Friendship  groups  and  other  groups  distinguish- 
able on  grounds  other  than  disputes  will  be  termed  cliques.  Actively 
disputing  groups  will  be  called  factions.  Often  these  groups  are  the 
same,  in  which  case  context  will  determine  usage. 

In  Sirkanda  such  groups  are  found  primarily  in  the  Rajput  caste, 
it  being  the  only  group  large  enough  to  contain  many  such  alignments, 
just  as  it  is  the  only  caste  large  enough  to  contain  several  different 
phratries,  sibs,  clans,  and  lineages  within  the  village.1  However,  not 
all  Rajputs  are  aligned  with  cliques  nor  are  all  non-Rajputs  unaligned. 
Some  members  of  other  castes  are  tied  into  Rajput  cliques,  sometimes 
despite  their  own  efforts  to  remain  neutral.  In  addition,  as  has  been 
noted,  there  are  disputes  within  and  among  joint  families,  between 
castes,  and  between  high-  and  low-caste  groups.  Examples  of  these  have 
been  discussed  in  previous  chapters  in  connection  with  the  social  units 
in  which  they  occur. 

In  Sirkanda  there  are  no  named  groups  which  correspond  to  cliques. 
The  nearest  thing  are  some  kin  groups  which  happen  to  be  coterminus 


266  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

with  certain  cliques.  Most  cliques,  in  fact,  are  not  generally  recognized 
social  entities.  There  are  no  special  social  centers  or  regular  occasions 
for  intra-clique  interaction.  Even  informants  who  wish  to  cooperate 
in  giving  information  on  this  subject  and  who  understand  the  concept 
well  are  hard-pressed  to  delineate  cliques  or  to  name  clique  members 
in  any  but  the  most  obvious  alliances.  Clique  divisions  and  membership 
can  in  many  cases  only  be  inferred  by  observation  of  interaction  in 
economic,  religious,  and  social  contexts.  Important  sources  of  data  in 
this  respect  are  patterns  of  visiting  and  friendship,  and  disputes  among 
villagers. 

As  a  result  of  inquiries  along  these  lines  it  was  found  that  in  Sirkanda 
cliques  tend  to  follow  caste,  sib,  clan,  lineage,  and  family  lines,  in 
order  of  increasing  relevance.  The  core  of  a  clique  is  usually  a  large 
or  well-to-do  family,  and  those  influential  in  the  clique  are  usually 
family  heads.  But  around  this  core  are  other  individuals  who  side 
with  the  core  group.  To  consider  cliques  independently  of  family  and 
larger  social  divisions  would  be  to  misunderstand  them.  If  they  deviate 
from,  or  cut  across,  these  boundaries,  that  fact  in  itself  is  important, 
since  it  runs  against  traditional  ideals  of  caste  and  kin-group  unity. 
Another  important  dimension  was  found  to  be  that  of  age.  People 
of  roughly  the  same  age  tend  to  participate  on  the  same  level  of 
interaction  in  inter-clique  behavior,  while  those  of  other  age  groups 
have  somewhat  independent  alignments.  Sex  is  also  a  factor  in  that 
women  have  their  own  cliques,  apparently  somewhat  independent  of 
those  of  their  husbands  and  based  upon  ties  of  relationship  and  com- 
mon village  origin  as  well  as  upon  jealousies  and  disputes  among 
themselves.  Women,  as  family  and  clan  members,  often  follow  in  the 
clique  alignments  of  their  husbands.  The  wives  of  men  who  are  at 
odds  generally  also  avoid  one  another  unless  they  have  close  ties  of 
relationship  or  common  village  origin,  and  sometimes  even  these  ties 
are  subordinated  to  male  factionalization.  In  this  study  only  male 
cliques  were  studied  sufficiently  to  draw  many  conclusions. 

Friendship  and  Visiting  Patterns 

One  important  manifestation  of  clique  membership  is  that  of 
patterns  of  friendship  and  visiting  in  the  village.  These  are  not  easily 
delineated.  One  villager  commented: 

There  are  no  special  friends  here.  People  talk  occasionally  to  everyone — 
whoever  they  meet  at  the  water  source,  at  work,  or  around  the  village.  They 
don't  talk  a  lot  with  anyone  outside  of  their  joint  family.  An  exception  is 
the  young  men  of  the  village,  who  often  sit  around  and  talk  togedier.  Cer- 
tain people  avoid  one  another  because  of  disputes  they  have  had. 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  267 

There  is  not  the  custom,  such  as  is  found  on  the  plains,  of  men 
sitting  in  a  living  area  reserved  for  them  and  passing  time  with  their 
friends.  There  is  no  area  in  Pahari  houses  where  men  can  gather, 
undisturbed  by  women  and  children.  Informal  visiting  by  small  groups 
of  men  (two  to  four)  does  occasionally  take  place  on  the  veranda  of  the 
house,  but  many  men  rarely  participate.  Principal  locations  for  social 
interaction  among  groups  of  men  are  the  village  shops  and  the  places 
of  work  of  artisans.  These  represent  "neutral  ground,"  and  an  indi- 
vidual does  not  compromise  himself  by  stopping  there  regardless  of 
who  else  may  be  there  or  may  later  come.  Since  everyone  is  welcome 
at  these  places  and  is,  in  fact,  expected  to  stop  at  least  briefly  if  he  is 
passing  by,  patterns  of  friendship  and  clique  composition  are  not  as 
clearly  revealed  as  they  would  be  in  individual  houses  where  only 
friends  are  welcome.  Other  informal  groups  relevant  to  an  under- 
standing of  friendship  and  clique  formation  are  those  of  men  working 
or  traveling  together. 

On  the  basis  of  observations  of  friendly  interaction  in  Sirkanda,  six 
main  cliques  were  found  among  Rajputs.  One  of  these  consisted  of 
two  lineages  of  the  Palial  sib,  the  second  consisted  of  the  third  lineage 
in  that  sib,  and  the  third  consisted  of  most  of  the  members  of  the 
largest  lineage  in  the  Jawari  sib.  The  fourth  and  fifth  were  formerly 
one  clique  consisting  of  another  lineage  in  the  Jawari  sib,  but  it  has 
split  so  that  now  there  are  essentially  two  family  isolates.  The  sixth  is 
another  small  Jawari  clique  (see  fig.  5).  The  importance  of  kin  ties 
in  these  alliances  is  obvious.  Two  of  the  cliques  follow  lineage  bound- 
aries (one  includes  two  and  the  other  one  lineage),  and  the  other  four 
follow  family  boundaries  (in  each  there  are  two  family  cliques  within 
a  lineage).  In  only  one  case  are  brothers  in  different  cliques. 

In  addition  to  these  main  groups,  there  are  individuals  and  groups 
whose  interaction  does  not  reveal  any  clique  alignments  or,  more 
importantly,  whose  interaction  spans  clique  boundaries  or  makes  cross- 
clique  groups.  Four  main  factors  seem  to  be  basic  to  such  individuals: 
(1)  age  ties,  (2)  affinal  ties,  (3)  ties  of  geographic  proximity,  (4)  lack  of 
particular  kinship  ties  which  would  tend  to  commit  the  individuals  to 
specific  cliques.  In  the  first  category,  age  ties,  is  the  group  of  young 
men  (20  to  35  years  in  age)  who  generally  ignore  the  factional  affiliations 
of  their  elders  and  associate  quite  freely  with  one  another.  They  even 
cut  across  caste  barriers  to  some  extent,  with  a  blacksmith  and  a  Bajgi 
often  being  included  in  the  group.  Children  are  another  such  age 
group.  In  the  second  category,  affinal  ties,  are  the  relationships  be- 
tween men  who  have  married  within  the  village,  and  their  male  in- 
laws. There  are  several  of  these  relationships,  which  take  the  form 


268 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 


of  frequent  informal  social  interaction  at  the  home  of  the  father-  or 
brother-in-law.  In  the  third  category,  geographical  proximity,  fall  the 
friendship  and  economic  and  ceremonial  cooperation  of  the  occupants 
to  this  category  is  the  interaction  of  neighbors,  especially  the  greater 
of  four  chans  in  a  small  area  %  mile  distant  from  the  village.  Related 
frequency  of  interaction  among  people  living  within  each  of  the  three 
main  settlement  areas  of  Sirkanda  than  occurs  between  these  sections, 


Jawari  lineages 


Palial  lineages 


1            1 

F   j    G    !    H 

i 

\ 
\ 
\ 

• 

F 

G 

H 

Reported 
early 

stage 


Time 


Present 


household 


NEUTRAL  1 

Kukhalwal  Rajput    „     i     . 

Brahmin 
Blacksmith         ,..       ..    i       . 

Khandial  Rajput 
Barber  ■ 

One  Blacksmith  household 
Bajgi 


Fig.  5.  Principal  Rajput  cliques  through  time. 

Cliques  are  enclosed  in  solid-line  boxes.  Broken  lines  indicate  lineage  bound- 
aries within  cliques.  Solid  arrows  indicate  development  through  time.  Broken 
arrows  indicate  casual  alliances.  Asterisked  lineages  are  at  present  small  in 
numbers  and  largely  unaffiliated. 

other  things  being  equal.  In  the  last  category,  lack  of  kinship  ties 
which  commit  individuals  to  cliques,  fall  the  members  of  three  rela- 
tively small  Jawari  Rajput  lineages,  the  members  of  one  small  sib 
in  the  village  (Kukhalwal),  and  the  members  of  other  castes.  The 
remaining  Rajput  sib,  Khandial,  consists  of  one  family  which  is  com- 
mitted by  marriage  to  the  first  Palial  clique  listed  above. 

Clique  alignments  and  deviations  from  them  are  evident  not  only 
in  visiting  patterns  but  in  cooperation  in  ritual  and  economic  under- 


THE   VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  269 

takings  as  well.  No  family,  lineage,  sib,  or  clan  is  large  enough  to 
perform  an  important  marriage  without  outside  assistance,  and  this 
is  usually  not  available  from  members  of  opposing  cliques.  Drinking 
parties  are  another  activity  in  which  cliques  and  clique  deviations  are 
readily  apparent. 

Disputes  and  Dispute  Resolution 

Dispute  reveal  clique  divisions  sharply.  They  are,  in  fact,  usually 
the  bases  for  the  avoidance  between  individuals  and  groups  which 
becomes  stereotyped  into  clique  behavior.  A  study  of  disputes,  there- 
fore, leads  to  an  understanding  not  only  of  what  the  clique  structure 
is,  but  of  how  it  got  that  way,  that  is,  how  cliques  are  formed  and  how 
they  change  through  time.  In  addition,  such  a  study  reveals  important 
information  about  the  means  and  dimensions  of  social  control  and 
conflict  resolution  in  the  community. 

In  discussing  disputes  a  major  difficulty  is  that  of  deciding  relative 
significance.  Disputes  of  all  intensities  occur,  from  the  minor  irritation 
that  is  quickly  forgotten  to  the  major  power  struggle  that  is  remem- 
bered for  generations.  Some  disputes  bring  about  formation  of  cliques 
or  factions;  most  are  symptomatic  of  already  existing  factionalization, 
and  some  are  unrelated  to  clique  affiliation.  Here  disputes  that  have 
aroused  strong  feelings  among  the  participants  and  that  are  apparently 
associated  in  some  way  with  clique  alignments  will  be  considered.  They 
include  all  those  upon  which  sufficient  relevant  information  was  avail- 
able for  analysis — the  recent  and  the  well-remembered.  A  few  occurred 
during  the  writer's  residence  in  Sirkanda;  most  occurred  within  the 
previous  10  years;  one  took  place  40  years  ago.  In  all  cases,  however, 
relevant  and  apparently  reliable  data  were  obtained  from  informants 
who  were  present  at  the  time  of  the  dispute. 

That  this  is  a  biased  sample  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  of  the 
32  in- village  disputes  analyzed,  19  resulted  in  estrangement  of  the 
parties  to  the  dispute  although  no  apparent  estrangement  had  existed 
previously,  and  only  13  perpetuated  or  were  symptomatic  of  old 
animosities,  so  far  as  could  be  determined.  Obviously  the  latter  would 
be  far  more  frequent  than  the  former  in  a  random  sample,  but  they 
are  less  well  remembered. 

Once  a  major  factional  split  has  occurred,  further  disputes  usually 
follow  at  frequent  intervals  which  sustain  and  often  deepen  the  rift. 
Disputes  without  significance  either  as  causes  or  symptoms  of  factional- 
ization do  not  appear  here,  not  because  they  do  not  occur,  but  because 
they  are  frequent,  usually  minor,  and  not  germane  to  this  discussion. 
In  this  category  would  fall  most  such  temporary  and  recurrent  disputes 


270  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

as  those  which  occur  frequently  among  family  members,  between  in- 
dividual women  in  the  village,  and  between  village  occupational 
specialists  and  the  clients  they  serve. 

Fifty-one  disputes  are  analyzed  here.  Of  these,  44  involved  Sirkanda 
people  either  as  both  parties  in  the  dispute  (32  cases)  or  as  one  party, 
the  other  being  from  a  neighboring  village  (12  cases).  The  seven  re- 
maining cases  involved  primarily  people  of  neighboring  villages,  but 
Sirkanda  people  were  involved  as  relatives,  council  members,  or 
witnesses. 

The  disputes  have  been  analyzed  in  terms  of  the  nature  of  the 
grievance  and  the  action  taken  as  a  result.  Grievances  were  categorized 
as  follows:  (1)  sex,  arising  from  illicit  sex  relations  or  alienation  of 
affection;  (2)  property,  arising  from  conflicting  claims  to  land,  houses, 
or  income;  (3)  status,  arising  from  nonadherence  to  caste  rules,  or 
inappropriate  caste  or  intercaste  behavior;  (4)  legal  testimony,  arising 
from  a  person's  refusal  to  testify  for,  or  his  testimony  against,  another 
in  a  court  case  in  which  he  was  to  have  appeared  as  a  witness  and 
in  which  some  connivance  had  been  planned;  (5)  beating  or  physical 
assault  on  another  (in  all  cases  this  occurred  as  a  result  of  grievances 
falling  under  one  of  the  other  categories  listed  here);  (6)  wife-stealing 
(transporting  a  woman  out  of  the  village  for  profit  rather  than  for 
personal  sexual  reasons);  (7)  malpractice  of  a  curing  rite. 

Actions  taken  to  resolve  or  win  a  dispute  have  been  categorized 
as  follows:  (1)  threats,  avoidance,  insults,  family  division,  and  so  on, 
which  involved  none  of  the  other  types  of  action  listed  below  but  which 
sometimes  eventuated  in  a  modus  vivendi  or  solution  acceptable  to 
both;  (2)  beating  or  physical  assault  on  another;  (3)  revenge  by  com- 
mitting a  like  offense,  the  only  such  case  in  this  sample  being  one  in 
which  a  man  whose  wife  was  regularly  having  sexual  relations  with 
another  man  helped  steal  that  man's  wife;  (4)  council  (referral  to  an 
ad  hoc  council  of  villagers);  (5)  intervention  by  gods;  (6)  intervention 
by  officials  (referral  to  police,  courts,  or  government  officials  outside 
the  village);  (7)  "frame-up"  (revenge  by  bringing  a  false  legal  charge 
against  an  opponent  after  arranging  matters  so  that  he  will  be  found 
guilty).  An  example  of  the  last  befell  a  man  whose  prosperity  was 
envied  by  his  caste-fellows.  They  had  once  tried  unsuccessfully  to  get 
some  of  his  land  by  bribing  the  government  records  officer  to  testify 
that  he  had  acquired  the  land  illegally.  Failing  in  this,  they  obtained 
revenge  by  hiding  liquor  in  his  house  and  calling  the  police  to  say 
that  he  was  dealing  in  illicit  liquor. 

The  frequencies  of  these  types  of  grievances  and  the  actions  taken 
are  presented  in  table  6.  Not  shown  in  the  figures  in  table  6  is  the 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  2 J  1 

fact  that  beatings,  and  to  a  lesser  extent  all  types  of  action  taken  in 
disputes,  were  preceded  and  accompanied  by  threats,  avoidance,  in- 
sults, and  so  on,  and  that  a  fight  was  always  a  possibility.  As  one 
villager  remarked  when  a  crippled  man  verbally  abused  another  man, 
"A  person  should  not  use  abuse  unless  he  is  strong  enough  to  fight." 
Also  not  shown  here  is  the  fact  that  the  council  case  for  woman- 
stealing  was  subsequently  prosecuted  by  the  government  in  the  courts, 
but  not  as  a  result  of  action  by  villagers. 

TABLE  6 
Sirkanda  Disputes  by  Type  and  Resultant  Action 

Action  Taken 
Threats,  Officials 

avoid-  Like  and      Frame- 

ance      Beating  offense  Council  Gods     courts        up       Totals 
Grievance 

Sex  6  5  13  2  2  1  20(39%) 
Property  8  1  —  —  —  4  1  14(27%) 
Status  3  —  —  2  —  —  1  6(12%) 
Testimony  3  —  —  —  —  _  _  3  (7%) 
Beating  —  ____  4_4  \%%) 
Woman- 
stealing  2  —  —  1  —  —  —  3  (6%) 
Malpractice  —  —  —  1  —  —  —  1(2%) 
Totals  22  6~~  ~~T          7  2  ~7u  3  5T~ 

(43%)  (12%)  (2%)     (14%)  (4%)  (20%)  (6%)  (100%) 

These  figures  and  the  relationships  among  them  show  a  number 
of  things  about  the  nature  of  Sirkanda  disputes.  Sex  and  property  are 
the  main  causes  for  disputes  which  get  into  the  public  eye  and  are 
felt  to  be  important  by  all  concerned.  Together  they  account  for  two- 
thirds  of  all  disputes  recorded.  Sex  disputes  are  consistently  resolved 
in  the  local  context.  The  two  cases  that  went  to  court  involved  obvious 
breaches  of  law.  Property  disputes,  on  the  other  hand,  go  much  more 
frequently  to  official,  outside  agencies  for  resolution.  Beatings  are 
usually  cause  for  a  lawsuit.  The  reasons  here  are  very  obvious:  you 
do  not  go  to  an  official,  the  police,  or  a  court  of  law  unless  you  have 
good  reason  to  think  you  will  win  your  case.  These  people  have  found 
that  beating  can  be  easily  proved  and  prosecution  is  sure,  and  that 
in  property  disputes  the  law  courts  often  decide  cases  on  the  basis 
of  evidence  which  is  ignored  in  the  village  context.  Consequently,  it 
is  worthwhile  to  take  such  cases  to  official  agencies.  Sex,  status,  mal- 
practice in  curing,  failures  to  keep  a  promise  to  testify  in  court,  and 


272  THE   VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

woman-stealing  are  areas  in  which  court  decisions  are  either  unavail- 
able or  unlikely  to  be  useful.  Woman-stealing,  which  might  seem  to 
be  amenable  to  court  decision,  is  rarely  referred  to  the  courts  because 
the  woman  has  invariably  cooperated  so  that  evidence  against  the 
"abductor"  is  usually  lacking.  Those  who  have  engaged  in  woman- 
stealing  as  a  regular  business  rarely  participate  in  the  abduction  of 
local  women,  and  those  who  do  it  only  once  can  always  plead  innocence 
and  support  their  plea  by  evidence  of  good  character. 

Further  insight  into  the  nature  of  appeal  to  courts  is  found  in 
the  three  "frame-ups."  In  each  case  grievances  which  could  not  be 
successfully  brought  to  a  court  of  law  were  resolved  by  manufacturing 
a  case  which  could  be  decided  in  the  courts.  The  three  actual  grievances 
were  an  illicit  sexual  affair,  jealousy  over  property,  and  anger  caused 
by  low-caste  insolence.  The  grievances  manufactured  and  brought  to 
court  were,  respectively,  assault  and  rape,  liquor-selling,  and  theft. 
Incidentally,  this  was  the  only  case  of  alleged  rape  known  in  the  area, 
and  one  of  the  very  few  allegations  of  theft. 

One  other  fact  worth  noting  is  that  the  village  council  is  not  used 
for  property  disputes.  Villagers  feel  that  justice  cannot  be  obtained 
because  the  council  is  made  up  of  people  with  heavy  vested  interests 
in  local  property,  who  would  decide  solely  in  terms  of  self-interest  or 
bribes. 

Disputes  are  not  submitted  for  arbitration  by  courts  (in  cases  of 
alleged  breaches  of  legal  statutes)  or  by  the  village  council  (in  cases 
of  alleged  breaches  of  custom)  unless  those  who  present  them  are  con- 
fident that  they  will  win.  Often  those  with  grievances  are  challenged 
to  take  them  to  court  or  a  council.  As  one  Rajput  informant  said, 
"If  there  is  a  legitimate  complaint  the  case  will  go  to  a  panchayat  or 
to  a  court.  If  not,  it  is  just  bickering." 

Gods  intervened  in  only  two  disputes,  both  hinging  on  sex.  Sex 
disputes  are  the  most  ambiguous  as  well  as  the  most  frequent  kind 
of  grievance.  Gods  can  give  satisfaction  to  one  party  when  no  one  else 
can.  They  intervene  much  more  frequently  than  this  analysis  in- 
dicates, because  they  often  enter  a  sex  dispute  between  two  women 
or  between  family  members  which  never  reaches  the  public  eye  or 
never  enters  into  factional  alliances.  Likewise  gods  frequently  inter- 
vene on  behalf  of  brides  from  other  villages  in  matters  unrelated  to 
sex. 

The  functions  of  various  kinds  of  groups  in  the  village  can  be  made 
clearer  by  investigating  the  nature  of  social  groups  which  engage  in 
various  types  of  disputes  and  employ  various  types  of  action  to  resolve 
them. 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  273 

Forty  of  the  disputes  analyzed  here  took  place  between  people  of 
the  same  caste.  Thirty-two  of  these  were  Rajput  disputes,  and  eight 
were  blacksmith  or  Bajgi  disputes.  Eleven  were  intercaste  disputes, 
three  between  Rajputs  and  Brahmins,  two  between  blacksmiths  and 
Bajgis,  and  six  between  particular  high  castes  and  low  castes.  These 
figures  are  largely  a  reflection  of  population  and  social  structure  in 
Sirkanda.  There  is  only  one  household  of  Brahmins.  Disputes,  as 
defined  here,  do  not  occur  within  households  except  when  they  result 
in  a  lasting  division  of  the  household  unit.  Bajgis  and  Lohars  are  few 
in  numbers,  and  each  of  these  castes  in  Sirkanda  is  composed  of  a 
closely  related  group  of  people  in  a  single  lineage.  The  eight  intra- 
caste  disputes  within  these  two  groups  are  a  reflection  of  the  fact 
that  low  castes  are  more  likely  to  divide  the  household  and  compete 
for  livelihood  than  are  the  other  castes.  Rajputs  are  numerous  and  com- 
prise four  different  sibs;  consequently,  most  disputes  in  the  village 
involve  them.  Most  disputes  which  villagers  would  describe  as  inter- 
sib  disputes  involve  local  sib  members,  and  usually  wives  side  with 
their  husbands.  Therefore  such  disputes  will  here  be  termed  inter- 
clan  disputes. 

In  the  40  intracaste  disputes,  22  were  between  clans,  five  were  within 
clans  but  between  lineages,  and  15  were  within  lineages.  One  dispute 
involved  both  inter-clan  and  interlineage  disputants,  and  another  in- 
volved both  inter-clan  and  intralineage  disputants;  hence  the  disparity 
in  totals. 

In  table  7,  grievances  and  action  taken  are  tabulated  according  to 
their  occurrence  in  intercaste  disputes,  disputes  which  are  within 
the  caste  but  between  clans  (inter-clan),  disputes  which  are  within 
the  clan  but  between  lineages  (interlineage),  and  those  which  are 
within  the  lineage  (intralineage).  This  table  shows  that  inter-clan  dis- 
putes are  predominately  concerned  with  alleged  sex  offenses,  while 
intralineage  disputes  are  most  often  centered  on  property.  This  can  be 
easily  explained  in  retrospect.  Only  within  the  lineage  is  property 
derived  from  a  common  estate,  and  only  there  is  property  held  in 
common  by  several  members  of  the  group.  That  is  where  one  would 
expect  to  find  disagreements  over  property — in  its  management  and 
division.  Intense  sexual  activity  occurs  across  clan  lines  because  clans 
are  essentially  sibs,  the  exogamous  units.  Since  all  legitimate  mates 
are  found  across  sib  lines,  the  potential  for  this  type  of  dispute  among 
these  groups  is  high.  Within  the  clan,  sib,  and  lineage,  wives  are  quite 
freely  available  to  their  husbands'  brothers,  real  and  classificatory, 
while  other  women  associated  with  the  lineage  are  exempt  by  incest 
rules.  Therefore,  disputes  of  this  kind  are  less  likely  within  these 


274  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

largely  exogamous  units.  The  sex  disputes  which  did  occur  within 
lineages  nearly  always  involved  one  man's  taking  over  another's  wife 
or  carrying  on  a  conspicuous  affair  with  her. 

TABLE  7 
Incidence  of  Disputes  by  Social  Groups  Involved  a 

Intercaste     Inter-clan     Interlineage     Intralineage 


Grievance 

11 

22 

5 

15 

Sex 

4 

11 

2 

3 

Property 
Status 

2 
3 

5* 

2* 

6 
3 

Testimony 

Beating 

Woman-stealing 

2 
1 
1 

2* 
2 

1 

1 

1 

1 
1 

Malpractice 

— 

1 

— 

— 

Action  Taken 

Threats 

4 

7* 

2 

10 

Beating 
Like  offense 

1 

4 

— 

1 
1 

Council 

3 

3 

— 

1 

Gods 

— 

1 

— 

1 

Officials 

2 

5* 

3* 

1 

Frame-up 

1 

2 

— 

— 

a  The  two  totals  marked  with  an  asterisk  which  appear  on  the  same  horizontal 
row  include  one  case  in  common;  for  example,  in  the  property  disputes,  there 
was  one  with  inter-clan  and  interlineage  disputants,  and  so  it  was  included  in  both 
columns  although  it  was  a  single  dispute.  This  accounts  for  the  fact  that  the  total 
number  of  cases  listed  here  is  53,  whereas  only  51  cases  were  analyzed. 

Disputes  in  general  are  more  common  among  status  equals  than 
across  status  boundaries.  Large  differences  in  status  are  associated 
with  differences  in  power,  so  that  disputes  across  status  boundaries 
are  infrequently  essayed  and  are  likely  to  be  nipped  in  the  bud  if 
begun.  Of  the  six  recorded  high-caste-low-caste  disputes,  one  involved 
woman-stealing  and  included  a  Brahmin  and  Rajput  as  well  as  a 
Bajgi  among  the  culprits,  so  that  it  was  hardly  a  case  of  high  caste 
versus  low  caste.  Two  of  the  others  involved  low-caste  insolence,  one 
resulting  in  a  "frame-up"  and  the  other,  which  involved  behavior  of 
children,  resulting  in  threats  and  verbal  abuse.  Another  was  a  low- 
caste  grievance  against  a  Brahmin  who  failed  to  pay  for  a  cow  taken 
on  agreement  to  purchase.  The  final  two  stemmed  from  a  sexual  liaison 
between  a  low-caste  man  and  an  acquiescent  Rajput  woman.  The  man 
was  beaten  and  then  took  his  assailants  to  court. 

The  other  five  intercaste  disputes  were  between  castes  adjacent  in 


THE   VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  275 

the  status  hierarchy,  and  did  not  differ  in  type  or  distribution  from 
what  would  be  expected  within  castes. 

Status  disputes  occurred  either  between  castes  or  within  lineages. 
The  former  were  matters  of  low-caste  insolence  prosecuted  by  the  high 
castes.  The  intralineage  status  disputes  were  cases  of  individuals  failing 
to  conform  to  requirements  of  caste  or  family  honor.  Lineage  mem- 
bers, as  those  most  immediately  involved,  were  the  group  which  sought 
to  rectify  matters. 

Figures  on  action  taken  show  that  lineage  solidarity  is  effective  in 
keeping  most  intralineage  disputes  on  a  verbal  level,  with  a  minimum 
of  public  display  and  outside  intervention.  Beatings,  council  action, 
and  court  cases  occurred  frequently  in  inter-clan  and  intercaste  cases. 
Apparently  group  controls  across  these  lines  are  relatively  weak. 

Physical  assault  as  a  means  of  resolving  a  difference  occurred  most 
often  among  status  equals  unrelated  to  one  another,  that  is,  at  the 
inter-sib  or  inter-clan  level.  Relatives  are  reluctant  to  fight,  and  low- 
caste  people  are  reluctant  to  get  themselves  into  a  position  where 
powerful  high  castes  will  have  an  excuse  to  attack  them.  The  only 
intercaste  beating  was  the  one  described  above,  in  which  a  low-caste 
sex  offender  was  beaten. 

The  distribution  of  cases  in  which  there  was  resort  to  outside  officials 
reflects  closely  the  distribution  of  disputes  over  property,  since  it  is 
in  property  disputes  that  official  agencies  are  most  useful. 

When  a  council  is  appealed  to  voluntarily  it  is  almost  always  as 
a  result  of  an  intercaste  dispute.  Within  the  caste,  less  conspicuous 
means  of  arbitration  are  preferred.  Three  of  the  four  cases  involving 
single  castes  (that  is,  inter-clan)  which  went  to  councils  were  intra- 
low-caste  disputes  into  which  councils  intervened  without  the  request 
of  those  involved.  Low  castes  try  to  keep  their  disputes  out  of  councils, 
where  they  say  low  castes  always  lose  and  only  the  council  wins. 

"Frame-ups"  occurred  only  in  intercaste  and  inter-clan  disputes, 
probably  because  such  plots  are  a  drastic  action,  usually  resulting  in 
imprisonment,  which  relatives  would  rarely  inflict  on  one  another. 

Clique  and  Faction  Formation 

The  clique  or  faction  structure  revealed  by  disputes  corresponds 
closely  to  that  shown  in  friendship  and  visiting  patterns,  and  explains 
the  formation  of  current  alignments. 

The  Jawari  sib  of  Rajputs  is  characterized  by  several  factional  splits 
and  antagonisms  toward  other  groups  as  a  result  of  a  number  of 
important  disputes.  It  was  allegedly  once  undivided  by  major  disputes. 
Then  two  factions,  A  and  B,  split  off  a  few  generations  ago,  as  the 


276  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

result  of  a  serious  sexual  dispute  (see  fig.  5).  Later  each  of  these 
factions  split  into  two  groups  along  family  lines  (Ai,  A2;  Bi,  B2)  as 
a  result  of  property  and  status  disputes.  One  of  these  divisions  also 
involved  a  half-brother  relationship,  a  relationship  which  quite  con- 
sistently results  in  social  distance  between  the  parties.  Most  recently, 
one  family  in  Ai  was  alienated  from  that  clique  as  a  result  of  a  status 
dispute,  and  so  it  joined  A2,  its  current  alignment.  Similar  histories 
could  probably  be  traced  for  other  cliques  in  the  village. 

In  general  there  is  considerable  disputing  between  the  two  large 
sibs  in  Sirkanda,  and  they  have  each  acted  as  factions  in  and  of 
themselves.  Within  these  groups  lineages  and  sometimes  households 
have  formed  cliques.  The  importance  of  kin  ties  can  be  readily  seen 
in  the  diagram,  although  they  are  not  equally  important  in  all  cliques. 
Other  groups  which  might  prefer  to  remain  neutral  tend  to  become 
aligned  with  cliques  through  friendship,  work  relationships,  affinal 
relations,  proximity,  and  so  on. 

In  correlating  friendship  groups  with  disputant  groups  it  becomes 
evident  that  not  all  friendship  groups  are  antagonistic  to  one  another. 
Between  the  Palial  cliques  there  is  little  or  no  animosity  (H,  FG). 
The  same  holds  for  the  relationship  of  B2  to  H  and  FG.  These  are, 
therefore,  cliques  that  are  on  good  terms  with  one  another.  On  the 
other  hand,  Ai,  A2,  Bi,  and  B2  are  antagonistic  to  one  another,  and 
Ai,  A2,  and  Bi  are  antagonistic  to  FG  and,  to  a  lesser  extent,  to  H. 
The  household  comprising  clique  Bi  is  generally  disliked  by  everyone 
in  the  village  except  one  Bajgi  household,  with  which  it  is  in  a  patron- 
like relationship,  and  lineage  C,  which  has  sided  with  it  occasionally. 
Clique  FG  is  the  most  generally  liked  group  in  the  village.  It  has  had 
few  disputes  with  others  and  comprises  a  loose-knit,  open  group. 

The  attitudes  between  cliques  are  usually  related  directly  to  the 
types  and  intensity  of  disputes  they  have  had  with  one  another.  The 
Jawari  sib  is  permeated  with  jealousy,  animosity,  and  disputes,  while 
the  Palial  sib  is  at  present  relatively  congenial.  As  has  been  mentioned 
before,  all  but  the  most  serious  disputes  tend  to  be  ignored  after  one 
or  two  generations  unless  they  are  reinforced  by  new  ones.  Therefore, 
young  men  of  Ai  and  A2  associate  freely  with  those  of  H  and  FG,  and 
even  the  youngest  man  of  the  isolated  and  generally  disliked  clique, 
Bi,  has  some  informal  social  contact  with  these  groups. 

The  effects  of  disputes  and  factionalization  on  the  community  are 
important  and  far-reaching.  They  sometimes  seriously  affect  village 
cohesion  just  as  they  do  lineage  and  clan  unity.  The  complexity  of 
disputes,  the  means  of  dealing  with  them,  and  their  effects  may  be 
illustrated  by  picking  two  examples  and  describing  them  briefly. 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  277 

Case  I 

The  most  serious  dispute  in  recent  history  was  over  land.  About  the  time 
of  World  War  I  the  army  purchased  some  Sirkanda  lands  a  little  over  a  mile 
from  the  village,  to  be  used  as  a  small  summer  encampment  for  Ghurka 
troops.  Two  stone  houses  and  some  other  improvements  were  made  there 
by  the  army.  For  nearly  twenty  years  the  camp  was  often  occupied  during 
the  summer  months.  The  army  was  rigidly  segregated  from  the  villagers  by 
army  orders,  with  one  exception — one  village  family  (A  in  the  diagram  of 
cliques)  sold  milk  to  the  army  and  became  friendly  with  its  personnel.  When 
the  army  left  in  1932,  the  milk-selling  family  bought  the  desirable  army  land, 
complete  with  its  buildings,  for  a  ridiculously  small  sum.  Other  villagers  were 
incensed  when  they  found  out  because  many  of  them  had  formerly  owned 
shares  in  the  land  and  they  had  been  given  no  opportunity  to  buy  their 
shares  back.  According  to  them,  the  sale  should  have  been  publicly  announced 
and  all  should  have  had  a  chance  to  buy  some  of  the  land. 

A  nine-year  legal  suit  resulted  which  was  eventually  won  by  the  milk-selling 
family  (A).  Although  the  law  seemed  to  be  on  the  side  of  the  other  villagers, 
the  village  accountant,  whose  records  were  crucial  to  the  case,  was  a  member 
of  the  winning  family.  Also  the  army  officers  had  liked  that  family,  had 
cooperated  with  them  in  the  sale,  and  had  testified  in  their  behalf  in  court. 
The  appellants  were  of  the  opposite  clan  (clique  FG)  but  were  actively  and 
openly  supported  by  members  of  a  rival  faction  (Bi)  in  the  milk-sellers'  clan 
who  hoped  to  get  land,  although  they  had  not  been  among  the  original 
owners  of  the  land.  It  was  essentially  the  village  versus  the  milk-sellers 
(cliques  Bi,  B2,  H,  FG  vs.  Ai,  A2). 

During  and  after  the  trial,  relations  between  the  disputants  and  their 
respective  supporters  deteriorated.  An  outside  merchant  was  brought  in  when 
the  suit  began,  so  that  villagers  would  not  have  to  buy  from  the  only  village- 
run  shop,  owned  and  operated  by  the  milk-sellers'  family.  These  two  shops 
have  remained  in  the  village,  in  full  view  of  one  another,  jealous  of  one 
another's  patronage,  and  a  constant  reminder  of  the  dispute.  A  member  of 
the  milk-selling  family  was  replaced  as  village  tax  collector  under  pressure 
occasioned  by  animosity  resulting  from  this  case.  Villagers  blame  subsequent 
lack  of  village  unity  largely  on  the  case.  Attempts  to  improve  the  water  supply 
have  failed,  and  money  granted  by  the  government  to  repair  the  school  and 
to  build  a  community  center  has  gone  unused.  Villagers  say  that  animosities 
kindled  and  fanned  by  the  old  dispute  prevent  agreement  and  cooperation 
on  the  new  projects  and  lead  individuals  to  purposely  subvert  plans  that  are 
made.  Even  the  lineage  that  won  the  case  has  been  split  because  one  member 
family  (A2)  could  not  pay  its  full  share  of  the  heavy  legal  expenses  and  so 
was  given  none  of  the  lands  it  had  been  promised  for  its  support.  It  there- 
fore broke  completely  away  from  the  rest  of  the  lineage. 

Case  II 

A  Rajput  woman,  who  lived  with  her  husband  in  a  chan,  fell  in  love  with 
a  relative  of  her  husband  who  lived  in  a  neighboring  chan.  When  the  hus- 


2^8  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

band  came  to  know  he  moved  away  from  the  chan  to  the  village,  whereupon 
his  wife  went  to  her  parents,  refusing  to  return  to  her  husband.  After  two 
years  the  wife  wanted  to  rejoin  her  husband,  but  he  then  refused  to  take  her. 
Her  family  insisted,  but  to  no  avail.  A  council  meeting  was  suggested,  but 
the  husband's  family  refused  in  highly  insulting  terms.  At  the  urging  of 
another  relative,  Sohan,  they  wrote  the  woman's  family  a  letter  saying  that 
the  marriage  was  void  and  they  would  have  nothing  to  do  with  her.  This 
angered  the  girl's  family  because,  since  no  money  had  been  demanded  as 
compensation,  the  divorce  implied  that  she  was  immoral  and  worthless.  They 
especially  resented  this  because  no  public  charges  had  been  placed  against 
the  girl.  Moreover,  the  unstated  charges  involved  the  husband's  own  relative; 
therefore,  they  felt,  the  girl  was  not  at  fault.  In  their  anger  the  woman's 
relatives  caught  and  beat  her  husband  and  his  brother.  Thereupon  Sohan 
urged  the  beaten  men  to  go  to  court  about  the  beating.  This  they  did  upon 
the  assurance  that  Sohan  would  stand  as  witness  in  their  behalf.  However, 
when  the  case  came  up,  Sohan  did  not  appear  as  promised.  The  husband's 
family  spent  a  good  deal  of  money  on  the  case,  which  lasted  a  year  and  was 
then  dropped.  Meanwhile,  Sohan  had  shifted  his  loyalties  to  the  other  side 
and  helped  them  with  advice  and  encouragement.  When  the  case  was  dropped, 
the  ex-wife  was  turned  over  as  wife  to  her  former  lover  at  the  chan,  who  had 
been  paying  part  of  the  legal  expenses  on  her  behalf. 

As  a  result,  the  disputants  (and  Sohan,  on  the  side  of  the  wife)  refused 
to  ever  again  attend  social  or  ritual  occasions  where  they  would  meet  and 
especially  where  eating  was  to  take  place.  This  avoidance  was  practiced  for 
over  five  years  until  a  prominent  and  well-liked  village  woman  died.  Her 
husband  had  been  in  one  of  the  two  large  Rajput  sibs,  and  she  was  a  member 
of  the  other,  a  daughter  of  the  village  as  well  as  a  village  wife  and  mother. 
The  entire  village  was  united  in  love  and  respect  for  her,  and  yet  the  two 
disputing  factions  refused  to  attend  the  death  ceremonies  together.  A  council 
meeting  was  held  to  come  to  a  new  agreement,  as  it  was  felt  by  those  not 
involved  in  the  dispute  that  the  estrangement  should  not  continue  with  such 
disruptive  effect.  A  compromise  was  reached  which  is  still  followed  today.  The 
two  parties  agreed  to  attend  all  village  functions  but  not  to  eat  in  the  kitchen 
area  on  such  occasions.  They  eat  outside  and  leave  as  soon  as  they  have 
eaten.  They  never  eat  in  the  kitchen  area  of  the  same  house  on  the  same  day. 

Villagers  generally  admit  that  the  husband  was  in  the  right  in  this  case, 
but  because  of  the  arrogant  rejection  of  council  arbitration  and  the  generally 
haughty  attitude  of  the  husband  and  his  family,  village  sympathies  were  with 
the  wife — to  teach  the  husband  a  lesson.  General  dislike  of  the  husband's 
family  also  entered  in.  In  this  case  the  husband's  family  comprised  clique  Bi; 
Sohan's  family  was  clique  Ai;  the  wife's  family  was  in  clique  FG. 

A  villager  commented,  in  reference  to  this  case,  "Village  disputes  are  of 
this  silly  nature." 

It  is  evident  from  these  somewhat  simplified  accounts  that  disputes 
are  complex,  that  alignments  are  not  firm  nor  entirely  consistent  and 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  279 

predictable,  and  that  ramifications  may  be  far-reaching  and  disruptive. 
The  motivations  determining  sympathies  and  alignments  among  non- 
disputants  are  usually  based  in  previous  grievances  and  are  often 
extremely  complex.  Nurturing  and  compounding  these  animosities 
by  planning  revenge  is  a  major  activity  among  some  villagers.  On  the 
other  hand,  in  daily  activities  the  animosities  are  kept  under  control 
so  that  they  come  into  the  open  relatively  infrequently  in  view  of  the 
amount  of  interpersonal  contact  which  is  inevitable  in  the  village. 

The  village  settlement  pattern  is  suggestive  in  this  regard.  While 
it  conforms  in  general  to  sib  and  lineage  distribution,  it  conforms 
even  more  closely  to  clique  alignments  (see  map  3,  p.  25).  Thus, 
clique  Bi,  the  most  isolated  and  antagonistic  clique,  is  physically 
isolated  in  a  single  house  on  the  western  edge  of  the  village;  clique 
Ai  is  isolated  in  the  house  nearest  the  Devi  shrine;  clique  A2  is  in 
two  adjacent  houses  on  the  edge  of  the  eastern  settlement  area;  clique 
H  is  in  the  line  of  houses  nearest  the  school.  Clique  FG,  the  most  open 
of  all,  is  in  the  center  of  the  village.  In  general,  the  most  congenial 
households  are  those  which  occupy  the  central  portion  of  the  village, 
while  those  harboring  animosities  and  rivalries  and  those  which  are 
simply  asocial  are  found  on  the  peripheries,  where  they  have  built 
houses  in  recent  years;  for  example,  all  houses  in  the  southwestern 
settlement  area  of  the  village  have  been  built  in  the  past  ten  years. 
A  possible  earlier  pattern  is  suggested  by  older  houses  in  the  village. 
Among  them  there  is  a  general  separation  of  the  Palial  sib  (lineages 
H,  FG)  and  Jawari  lineages  B,  D,  E  (all  located  in  the  central  settle- 
ment area,  although  clustered  by  sib)  on  the  one  hand,  and  Jawari 
lineages  A  and  C  and  the  Kukhalwal  sib  (located  in  the  eastern  settle- 
ment area)  on  the  other. 

Cliques  have  no  formal  organization.  The  elder  men  of  the  house- 
holds involved  tend  to  be  the  policymakers  for  the  cliques  and  to 
enforce,  when  possible,  loyalty  and  conformity  within  the  group.  The 
clique  is  an  extremely  loose  relationship  when  more  than  one  house- 
hold is  involved. 

Clique  alignments  serve  as  barriers  to  communication  and  common 
action  among  villagers,  and  therefore  they  are  divisive  factors.  On  the 
other  hand,  they  facilitate  interaction  among  members  of  the  same 
clique,  thus  forming  a  close  tie  that  is  not  always  coextensive  with 
ties  of  kinship  and  caste.  Insofar  as  they  do  that  they  help  bind  the 
community  together  across  natural  lines  of  cleavage.  Moreover,  it 
should  be  emphasized  that  cliques  operate  primarily  in  the  community 
context.  Outside  the  community  they  have  little  relevance.  None  of 
the  cliques  in  Sirkanda  has  close  ties  in  other  villages  which  divide 


28o  THE   VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

them  against  other  groups  in  the  community  in  intervillage  disputes. 
In  relations  with  other  villages,  caste  is  often  a  divisive  force  but 
cliques  are  not.  An  outside  threat  brings  unity  to  the  village  unless 
there  are  conflicting  caste  or  kin-group  loyalties.  Also,  clique  differ- 
ences are  largely  disregarded  in  dealings  with  the  urban  and  official 
worlds.  In  town  and  in  relations  with  officials,  Sirkanda  villagers 
usually  support  one  another  regardless  of  clique  differences  in  the 
village. 

An  important  source  of  cross-clique  communication  which  leads  to 
a  weakening  of  clique  loyalties  and  a  lessening  of  the  divisiveness  of 
cliques  is  that  of  in-village  marriage.  The  importance  of  in-law  rela- 
tionships among  village  men  in  cutting  across  clique  lines  has  already 
been  noted.  Perhaps  even  more  important  is  the  role  of  the  local 
girl  who  marries  in  the  village  and  is  at  once  a  wife  in  one  clique 
(and  sib)  and  a  daughter  or  sister  in  another.  Seventeen  per  cent  of  all 
marriages  (20  per  cent  of  Rajput  marriages,  the  relevant  ones  in  this 
context)  occur  within  the  village.  Such  marriages  always  occur  across 
sib  lines,  all  sibs  are  connected  by  such  affinal  ties,  and  nearly  half 
of  all  intracaste  disputes  occur  across  sib  lines.  Therefore,  in-village 
marriage  is  an  important  factor  in  village  cohesion  which  is  absent 
in  exogamous  villages. 


Councils  (Panchayats) 

The  ad  hoc  councils  (panchayats)  which  were  summoned  in  eight 
of  the  disputes  discussed  above,  to  arbitrate  in  cases  concerning  sex, 
property,  and  status,  are  the  locus  of  formalized  traditional  community 
government  insofar  as  this  exists  at  all  (cf.  Newell,  1954).  These  coun- 
cils act  primarily  in  cases  involving  traditional  rules  of  behavior. 
Atkinson  notes  that  in  Garhwal: 

Panchayats  for  the  settlement  of  social  disputes  have  long  been  known 
...  in  the  hills.  .  .  .  They  are  now  usually  assembled  for  the  settling  of 
cases  of  abduction  or  seduction  of  women,  or  offenses  against  caste.  Witnesses 
are  heard  on  each  side,  and  the  award  given  is  usually  submitted  to.  A  fine 
is  often  imposed  and  a  feast  given  to  the  assembled  brethren  at  the  expense 
of  die  offending  party.  (Atkinson,  1886,  pp.  265  f.) 

Panchayats  are  ad  hoc  rather  than  permanently  constituted  bodies. 
Their  membership  is  recruited  by  invitations  sent  out  by  elders  of  the 
households  involved  to  other  interested  households,  who  then  send 
representatives.  The  membership  varies  with  circumstances,  but  it  is 
traditionally  confined  to  the  high  castes,  and  women  are  never  council 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  201 

members.  In  intervillage  disputes  councils  are  intervillage  in  com- 
position, generally  with  representatives  from  a  number  of  neighboring 
villages.  In  an  intravillage  dispute  they  may  include  representatives 
of  neighboring  villages  if  the  matter  is  considered  to  have  implications 
which  extend  beyond  the  village,  such  as  a  breach  of  proper  intercaste 
relations.  For  purely  local  matters  panchayats  are  made  up  of  local 
men,  many  or  few  depending  upon  interest.  A  case  of  woman-stealing 
will  usually  involve  a  large  meeting;  a  mutually  desired  divorce  will 
involve  a  council  of  only  three  persons.  Since  councils  consist  of  high- 
caste  people,  Rajputs  dominate  them  in  Sirkanda.  However,  except 
in  purely  internal  matters  within  a  high  caste,  both  Brahmins  and 
Rajputs  are  represented  in  most  council  meetings.  Such  councils  decide 
those  low-caste  disputes  which  reach  a  council  as  well  as  high-caste 
disputes  and  disputes  between  high  and  low  castes.  Within  the  council, 
discussion  and  decision  making  are  quite  democratic,  with  the  expected 
deference  to  age  and  generation.  Wealth,  ability  to  speak  and  reason 
convincingly,  and  an  even  temper  are  other  qualities  which  lend 
influence  to  a  man  in  these  situations.  Clique  affiliation  becomes  im- 
portant in  that  those  aligned  with  small,  unpopular,  hostile  groups  are 
able  to  wield  less  influence  than  those  affiliated  with  large,  popular 
groups  or  those  who  are  known  to  be  objective  or  little  committed  to 
any  particular  group. 

Councils  or  panchayats  serve  mainly  to  coordinate  and  express 
public  opinion.  Usually  the  members  of  the  council  are  well  aware  in 
advance  of  the  facts  and  opinions  relevant  to  any  dispute  put  before 
them.  Their  decision  is  often  a  means  of  making  official  that  upon 
which  there  is  already  general  agreement.  Most  often  they  attempt 
to  come  to  a  mutually  agreeable  compromise.  In  more  serious  cases, 
or  those  in  which  the  parties  are  unable  or  unwilling  to  compromise, 
the  council  can  impose  sanctions  under  threat  of  physical  punishment, 
social  ostracism,  or  legal  action.  It  may  order  a  man  to  leave  the 
village,  to  make  payment  or  some  other  concession  to  another  party, 
to  make  payment  to  the  council  itself,  or  to  refrain  from  certain  types 
of  social  interaction.  Public  humiliation  or  a  public  beating  may  also 
be  inflicted,  usually  upon  flagrant  sexual  offenders,  primarily  wife- 
stealers.  In  two  such  disputes  among  those  analyzed  here,  the  offender 
was  led  through  the  village  wearing  a  garland  of  worn-out  shoes 
around  his  neck — an  extremely  humiliating  punishment  because  of 
the  defiling  nature  of  shoes  as  being  made  of  cow  leather.  In  one  case 
the  offender  was  then  beaten  with  shoes. 

There  is  little  confidence  in  the  objectivity  of  councils.  They  are 
thought  (quite  correctly)  to  be  heavily  influenced  by  caste,  clique,  and 


282  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

kin-group  loyalties  and  to  be  easily  swayed  by  money  and  favors.  As 
a  Rajput  said,  "Whoever  treats  the  council  to  the  best  feast  wins  the 
case."  Low-caste  people,  in  particular,  distrust  councils,  because  in 
disputes  among  themselves  as  well  as  those  between  themselves  and 
high  castes  they  are  often  victimized  by  the  councils.  Stories  of  such 
cases  are  numerous.  An  example  follows: 

A  blacksmith  girl  of  a  neighboring  village  was  married  to  an  old  blacksmith 
man.  She  was  unhappy  with  this  arrangement  and  soon  returned  to  her 
parents.  From  there  she  later  eloped  with  a  blacksmith  boy.  None  of  the 
parties  involved  were  concerned  enough  to  try  to  alter  the  situation.  How- 
ever, Rajputs  of  the  village  found  out  about  it.  They  knew  (according  to 
blacksmiths)  that  the  boy  involved  had  Rs.  600  in  his  possession.  They  there- 
fore called  a  council  meeting  of  Rajputs  and  went  to  the  girl's  father  and 
extracted  from  him,  by  threats  and  promises,  a  complaint  in  the  case.  They 
then  caught  the  boy,  brought  him  before  the  council,  and  fined  him  Rs.  600. 
The  terrified  boy  paid  this  sum  willingly,  glad  to  escape  without  a  beating. 
Two  hundred  rupees  of  the  fine  went  to  the  girl's  father,  and  the  remainder 
was  "swallowed  up"  by  the  council. 

Even  high-caste  people  are  occasionally  victimized  in  this  way.  A 
council  meeting  is  always  expensive  for  those  whose  dispute  is  to  be 
decided,  as  they  are  obligated  to  feed  and  house  the  council  members 
and  must  do  it  well  or  risk  losing  the  case. 

For  these  reasons  cases  are  rarely  referred  to  councils  by  the  dis- 
putants. People  prefer  to  carry  on  private  feuds,  as  witness  the  fact 
that  well  over  half  the  cases  discussed  here  were  kept  on  this  level 
although  they  were  of  quite  major  importance.  Councils  usually  inter- 
vene upon  the  insistence  of  people  not  parties  to  the  dispute  and 
usually  when  the  dispute  is  such  that  it  affects  others  not  immediately 
involved  in  it.  In  extreme  cases,  and  especially  in  the  case  of  a  beating, 
woman-selling,  or  illegal  alienation  of  land,  when  it  is  felt  that  a  law 
has  been  broken,  people  take  their  grievance  to  the  courts — again 
an  expensive  undertaking  where  money  counts  above  all  else,  but 
where  the  decisions  are  firm.  Informants  state  that  in  earlier  days  the 
main  resort  in  all  cases  was  to  gods,  who  would  punish  a  person's 
rival  or  bring  a  favorable  conclusion  to  a  dispute  in  response  to  worship 
and  sacrifice.  As  education  and  money  have  increased,  courts  and  coun- 
cils have  been  increasingly  used,  often  in  addition  to  appeal  to  the  gods. 

In  these  hills  there  are  still  relatively  few  civil  and  criminal  cases, 
especially  the  latter.  Litigation  in  the  courts  is  a  less  important  activity 
than  it  is  in  many  plains  areas,  while  crimes  of  theft  and  violence  (other 
than  occasional  retributional  beatings)  are  very  rare.  Murder  occurs 
rarely — never  in  the  history  of  Sirkanda,  and  four  or  five  times  in  the 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  283 

history  of  Bhatbair.  The  cases  in  Bhatbair  were  apparently  carefully 
planned  retributional  killings.  In  each  case  the  victim  was  widely 
known  as  a  scoundrel.  Those  who  had  grievances  against  him  caught 
him,  tied  him  up,  told  him  their  intent  and  the  reasons  for  it,  and 
then  methodically  beat  him  to  death.  Less  severe  beatings  are  also 
sometimes  administered  in  this  way. 

Suicide  is  virtually  unknown  in  this  area.  In  the  past  a  woman 
occasionally  immolated  herself  on  her  husband's  funeral  pyre.  Only 
one  such  case  is  known  for  Sirkanda.  Rape  has  never  occurred  in 
Sirkanda;  villagers  have  difficulty  imagining  it  in  the  Pahari  context. 
Woman-selling,  illegal  sale  of  liquor,  and  illegal  use  of  government 
forest  land  are  the  most  common  offenses,  and  they  are  not  offenses  in 
Pahari  customary  law. 

Leadership  and  Influence 

Outside  the  family,  in  which  the  eldest  active  male  is  the  recog- 
nized authority,  there  is  no  generally  recognized  leadership  in  the 
village  beyond  that  of  elder,  landowning  males.  Individuals  hold  power 
in  the  village  primarily  to  the  extent  that  they  are  influential  as  a  result 
of  personal  qualities  in  important  cliques,  or  are  members  (especially 
household  heads)  of  large  and  wealthy  families.  Wealth,  verbal  ability, 
an  even  temper,  modesty,  and  simple  living  are  virtues  which  win  a 
man  respect.  But  no  man  is  in  a  position  to  tell  others  outside  his 
family  what  to  do.  Villagers  found  it  hard  to  conceive  of  an  influential 
leader,  and  seemed  opposed  to  the  notion.  They  recognized  a  former 
condition  when  a  "sayana"  held  rights  to  collect  taxes  and  as  superior 
"landlord"  had  control  over  those  on  his  lands.  But  since  all  high 
castes  now  own  land,  they  feel  that  none  should  have  power  over  others. 
Their  attitude  parallels  that  reported  by  Baden-Powell  (1892,  I,  p.  153), 
who  noted  the  absence  of  a  headman  in  "landlord"  villages  where 
"the  proprietary  families  were  too  jealous  of  the  equal  rights  to  allow 
of  any  degree  of  authority  residing  in  one  head."  Sirkanda  villagers 
do  not  pay  much  attention  to  the  official  headman  (council  president), 
nor  is  the  position  sought  after.  They  resent  the  powers  officially  in- 
vested in  this  office.  They  neither  want  them  for  themselves,  nor  will 
they  grant  them  to  others.  One  man  summarized: 

Here  all  [high-caste]  men  are  the  same.  They  do  what  they  want  without 
regard  for  others.  They  decide  on  the  basis  of  what  is  best  for  them.  If 
several  people  agree,  that  is  good,  but  it  will  not  lead  others  to  agree  unless 
they  come  independently  to  the  same  conclusion.  Every  man  does  what  is 
best  for  his  household  without  regard  for  what  others  think  or  want  to  do. 


284  THE   VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

This  does  not  mean  that  power  and  influence  are  evenly  distributed, 
but  it  does  mean  that  they  are  ideally  so  and  that  in  reality  they  will 
approximate  this  ideal  state. 

At  one  time  Sirkanda  lands  were  included  under  those  granted  by 
the  Raja  to  a  Brahmin  of  Kanda,  as  discussed  previously.  This  man, 
as  "sayana,"  collected  taxes  and  theoretically  had  some  control  over 
those  who  occupied  his  lands.  The  term  "sayana"  still  carries  strong 
connotations  of  status  and  power  among  people  of  the  area.  The  first 
remembered  formalized  village  government  in  Sirkanda  was  that  of 
the  hereditary  mukhia  or  keeper  of  the  peace,  recognized  by  the  British. 
He  decided  petty  local  disputes  and  transgressions  brought  before  him 
and  referred  more  important  cases  to  a  council  of  five  mukhias  in  the 
vicinity.  It  was  his  responsibility  to  serve  as  the  administrative  link 
between  the  British  government  and  the  villagers.  Above  him  were 
the  courts  and  the  district  government. 

The  village  lambarddr  or  appointed  tax  collector  was  also  a  man 
of  influence  under  the  British  and  was  considered  to  be  a  village  leader 
much  like  the  mukhia.  Apparently  the  lambardar  is  a  more  recent 
innovation  in  this  village. 

Today  there  is  only  one  paid  government  employee  who  is  normally 
a  villager.  He  is  the  village  chaukldar  or  watchman.  His  duties  are  to 
report  births  and  deaths  in  the  village  and  to  act  as  a  government  mes- 
senger when  needed.  In  this  area  it  is  a  position  of  little  importance 
and  no  prestige.  The  man  who  fills  this  position  for  Sirkanda  and 
several  surrounding  villages  is  a  resident  of  Chamba,  a  nearby  village. 
He  is  rarely  seen  in  Sirkanda  and  is  dependent  upon  the  Sirkanda 
village  president  for  the  information  he  is  required  to  supply  to  the 
government. 

Formal  Village  Government  Today 

Today  formal  village  government  is  in  the  hands  of  the  village 
council  as  specified  in  the  U.  P.  Panchayat  Raj  Act  of  1947  and  as 
amended  thereafter  (Dwivedi,  1957).  According  to  this  act,  a  village 
or  group  of  villages  is  under  the  jurisdiction  of  a  "village  government" 
or  assembly  (Gdbn  Sab  ha),  consisting  of  all  sane  adults  (that  is, 
people  21  years  of  age  or  over)  within  the  area  for  which  it  is  estab- 
lished. Presiding  over  this  body  is  a  president  (pradhan)  elected  from 
among  the  membership  for  a  three-year  term  of  office,  and  a  vice- 
president  (up-pradhan)  elected  for  a  one-year  period.  This  body  is 
supposed  to  hold  two  annual  meetings  as  well  as  others  upon  request 
of  the  membership. 

From  among  its  members   the  village  assembly   elects   a   "village 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  285 

council"  (Gdon  Panchdyat)  to  function  as  an  executive  committee. 
This,  too,  is  presided  over  by  the  village  president  and  vice-president. 
Membership  in  this  body  is  for  the  same  period  as  the  president's  term 
in  office  (now  three  years).  The  powers,  duties,  and  functions  of  village 
councils  are  wide,  covering  all  aspects  of  village  welfare,  upkeep,  and 
control  and  serving  as  the  local  agency  for  higher  governmental  author- 
ity as  sanctioned  by  that  authority.  Moreover,  it  is  empowered  to  im- 
pose taxes  and  hold  property.  It  is  required  to  report  to  the  village 
assembly  at  that  body's  semiannual  meeting. 

In  Sirkanda  these  provisions  are  unknown  to  many  villagers  and  are 
imperfectly  understood  by  those  who  know  of  them.  The  village  as- 
sembly is  thought  by  some  to  consist  only  of  men,  and  in  practice  this 
is  apparently  the  case.  It  did  not  meet  in  1957-1958,  nor  had  it  met 
since  the  election  of  the  village  council  two  years  earlier.  A  meeting 
was  called  by  the  teacher  and  village  level  worker  to  celebrate  Republic 
Day  in  1958,  but  despite  advance  publicity,  not  a  single  individual 
appeared  at  the  appointed  hour.  This  body  is  significant  in  village 
government  in  Sirkanda  only  in  that  it  is  the  electoral  body  for  the 
council.  The  area  which  is  included  with  Sirkanda  in  a  common 
village  government  includes  four  other,  smaller  villages,  from  1%  to 
8  trail  miles  from  Sirkanda.  They  have  little  in  common  beyond  the 
fact  that  they  are  the  only  villages  in  a  large,  relatively  unpopulated 
geographic  area  which  the  government  has  chosen,  for  administrative 
purposes,  to  consider  a  unity.  Two  of  the  villages  are  trading  centers 
on  the  Mussoorie-Tehri  trail;  one  (Suakholi)  is  very  active;  the  other 
is  virtually  deserted.  The  other  two  villages  are  similar  to  Sirkanda. 
The  local  governmental  seat  for  this  area  is  Sirkanda. 

The  village  council  is  composed  of  16  members  at  present.  Eleven 
of  these  are  from  Sirkanda  (including  one  low-caste  man  in  a  seat 
reserved  for  "scheduled  castes");  two  are  from  the  largest  of  the  other 
villages,  a  trading  center;  and  one  is  from  each  of  the  other  three 
villages.  The  president  and  vice-president  are  Sirkanda  men,  though 
they  need  not  be.  All  are  Rajputs  except  for  the  occupant  of  the 
reserved  scheduled-caste  seat,  a  blacksmith,  and  a  Vaishya  merchant 
from  the  trading  center  included  in  this  area. 

This  system  of  village  government  was  established  in  Sirkanda  in 
1951  when  Sirkanda  was  joined,  for  administrative  purposes,  with 
five  other  villages  in  the  immediate  vicinity,  all  with  common  interests 
and  problems.  At  that  time  a  widely  respected  Sirkanda  Rajput  was 
elected  president  (for  the  then-prescribed  five-year  term)  without  op- 
position. At  the  end  of  his  term,  in  1956,  the  laws  had  been  changed 
so  that  the  term  was  reduced  to  three  years  and  the  area  had  been 
redivided    administratively    in    its    present    unrealistic    manner — ap- 


286  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

parently  partly  to  reduce  the  population  included  under  one  village 
government.  At  that  time  the  former  president  declined  to  run  again 
and  gave  his  approval  to  another  man  in  the  village — the  wealthiest 
Sirkanda  villager,  but  a  man  well  known  for  his  modesty,  simplicity, 
and  hard  work,  and  one  unaligned  with  any  antagonistic  clique  (he 
is  in  clique  H  in  figure  5;  his  predecessor  was  in  clique  FG).  Against 
him  ran  the  most  generally  disliked  villager  (head  of  clique  Bi),  a  man 
who  apparently  wanted  the  power  and  did  not  realize  his  own  un- 
popularity. Needless  to  say,  the  latter  lost  the  election,  receiving  only 
a  few  votes  from  some  of  his  sib-fellows  and  apparently  none  from 
other  sibs  or  castes  or  the  other  three  major  cliques  in  his  own  sib. 

It  was  difficult  to  get  enough  candidates  for  the  village  council; 
there  was,  therefore,  no  competition.  Some  villagers  on  the  village 
council  are  under  the  impression  that  the  president  of  the  village 
helps  select  the  candidates  for  the  council  and  that  he  must  approve 
them  before  they  take  office.  They  evidently  acquired  this  idea  be- 
cause, in  the  elections  held  thus  far,  the  village  president  has  had  to 
use  his  influence  to  get  people  to  accept  nomination  for  that  office.  A 
factor  which  has  discouraged  candidates  is  that  each  had  to  pay  a  fee  of 
Rs.  6  before  assuming  office.  This  appears  to  be  the  fee  for  membership 
in  the  Congress  party,  which  many  villagers  evidently  assumed  to  be 
a  prerequisite  to  election.  On  this  point  there  is  confusion,  as  some 
villagers  claim  to  have  had  to  pay  Rs.  12,  Rs.  6  for  nomination  and 
6  to  become  Congress  members.  In  any  case,  there  are  now  17  villagers 
who  joined  the  Congress  party  at  the  time  of  elections,  including  those 
who  became  council  members  and  a  few  others.  They  paid  Rs.  6  each 
to  become  members,  while  the  council  president  reportedly  had  to 
pay  Rs.  12.  The  villagers  joined  the  Congress  party,  according  to  one 
of  their  number,  under  the  impression  that  they  would  thereupon 
become  members  of  a  "ruling  group" — the  power  elite  of  Sirkanda. 
They  apparently  gained  this  idea  from  government  officials  who  helped 
set  up  the  village  government  and  who  recruited  members.  One  man  re- 
marked ruefully,  "If  I  had  spent  that  money  on  ghee,  I  could  have 
been  big  and  strong  by  now;  this  way  it  was  wasted." 

The  defeated  candidate  for  president  of  the  council  refused  to  join 
the  Congress  party,  and  so  the  election  was  officially  a  Congress  party 
victory — grass-roots  support  for  the  party.  In  fact,  no  villager  under- 
stands the  Congress  party  or  even  the  significance  of  party  affiliation. 
Moreover,  to  a  man,  the  village  is  opposed  to  the  present  (Congress) 
government  of  India  and  to  virtually  all  its  policies,  as  will  be  made 
clear  below.  Worst  of  all,  from  the  party's  point  of  view,  the  villagers 
are  opposed  to  Independence. 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  287 


Village  Government  in  Action 

The  village  council  of  Sirkanda  met  once  during  1957-1958,  in 
a  meeting  called  by  the  village  level  worker,  a  government  employee 
stationed  in  the  village.  This  meeting  was  announced  well  in  advance 
and  was  scheduled  to  coincide  with  the  annual  visit  of  the  government 
tax  collector  and  the  even  rarer  presence  of  the  village  accountant, 
with  both  of  whom  all  landholders  had  to  deal.  The  village  level 
worker  was  motivated  to  call  the  meeting  primarily  because  it  was 
time  for  him  to  turn  in  certain  reports,  but  it  was  announced  as  a 
meeting  to  discuss  village  improvements.  No  agenda  was  circulated  in 
advance.  The  meeting  was  held  in  the  open  near  the  two  village  shops 
and  beside  the  trail  to  the  village  water  supply — a  pleasant,  convenient, 
and  conspicuous  location,  with  the  shops  serving  as  comfortable  re- 
treats for  bored  participants  and  observers.  Even  in  these  favorable 
circumstances  attendance  was  poor.  Most  council  members  did  their 
business  with  the  government  officials  and  left.  Most  of  those  who  at- 
tended the  meeting  did  so  out  of  idle  curiosity,  drifting  in  as  they  felt 
inclined  and  away  again  as  they  tired  of  joining  their  colleagues  in 
peering  through  the  village  accountant's  spectacles,  reading  the  tax 
collector's  book  of  blank  receipts,  stamping  one  another  with  the  offi- 
cial panchayat  seal,  gossiping  with  their  neighbors,  or  making  sarcastic 
remarks  about  the  business  of  the  meeting. 

Three  of  the  five  outside  members  attended  the  meeting,  having  been 
summoned  to  Sirkanda  for  that  purpose  and  having  nothing  else  to 
do  while  there.  Four  Sirkanda  members  attended  throughout  most  of 
the  meeting  and  were  a  fairly  attentive,  if  passive,  group.  Four  others 
were  there  sporadically,  and  four  or  five  nonmembers  participated 
occasionally.  One  of  the  nonmembers  was  among  the  eight  who  signed 
the  minutes — an  official  act  which  was  the  highlight  of  the  meeting. 
Two  members,  including  the  vice-president,  stopped  by  for  this  pur- 
pose only,  having  heard  none  of  the  prior  business,  and  joined  eagerly 
in  the  signing  of  the  minutes  (recorded  by  the  village  level  worker) 
without  having  read  them.  In  addition  an  occasional  member  and 
various  nonmembers  of  all  ages  and  both  sexes  stopped  briefly  by  on 
their  way  to  or  from  the  water  source,  joining  curious  children  and 
livestock  to  hear  or  see  what  might  occur.  Following  is  an  account  of 
the  meeting  as  recorded  by  the  author: 

The  tax  collector  and  village  accountant  had  been  doing  their  business  in 
one  of  the  village  shops  beginning  at  about  10  a.m. 

At  2:30  p.m.  the  village  president  and  the  village  level  worker  [VLW] 


200  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

arrived  with  their  record  books  and  a  tarpaulin  and  went  to  a  spot  near  the 
shops  to  prepare  for  the  meeting.  The  VLW  sat  down  and  wrote  out  an 
agenda  of  the  meeting,  which  should  have  been  circulated  to  members  in 
advance.  It  read  as  follows: 

All  members  of  the  Gram  Panchayat,  Sirkanda,  are  informed  hereby  that 
a  meeting  of  the  Panchayat  is  to  take  place  on  Sunday  [in  reality  it  was 
Monday],  the  twenty-third  of  December,  1957,  at  Sirkanda  School,  at  2  p.m. 
All  members  are  requested  to  be  present  at  that  time.  The  following  items 
will  be  considered  by  the  members: 

1.  Consideration  of  last  meeting's  proceedings. 

2.  Consideration  of  doing  the  remaining  work  to  improve   the  drinking 
water  supply. 

3.  Consideration  of  collection  of  panchayat  tax  in  arrears  and  of  future  tax. 

4.  Consideration  of  voluntary  labor  in  the  village. 

5.  Consideration  of  opening  a  night  school  for  adults. 

6.  Consideration  of  sending  five  people  to  village  training  camp. 

7.  Consideration  of  starting  a  Village  Credit  Cooperative  Society  in  Sirkanda. 

After  the  above  agenda  had  been  written,  the  VLW  asked  the  president  to 
call  the  council  members  and  begin  the  meeting.  This  was  done  and  seven 
people  came  and  sat  for  the  meeting — four  Sirkanda  members,  three  outside 
members,  and  one  nonmember.  One  additional  member,  who  had  been  pay- 
ing his  tax,  signed  the  agenda  to  indicate  his  presence  but  left  at  once  with 
the  excuse  that  he  had  to  arrange  for  the  tax  collector's  lunch.  The  village 
shopkeeper,  who  was  within  earshot,  participated  occasionally  in  discussions. 

The  VLW  started  the  meeting  by  reading  the  minutes  of  the  last  meeting, 
over  one  year  previous. 

Then  the  second  item  on  the  agenda,  concerning  the  drinking  water 
supply,  was  discussed.  The  VLW  asked  the  president  what  he  thought  should 
be  done.  The  latter  told  him  to  request  the  Block  Development  Officer  to 
send  an  overseer  to  Sirkanda  to  examine  the  problem  and  advise  them  how 
to  solve  it. 

The  third  item  on  the  agenda  was  read  by  the  VLW  to  the  members.  The 
tax  arrears  were,  for  every  household  in  the  village,  R.  1  per  year  from  1949 
through  1955.  The  VLW  read  an  official  circular  which  said  that  a  Tax  Col- 
lection Week  should  be  observed  by  every  panchayat  for  which  the  president 
should  appoint  a  committee  of  five  persons  and  go  from  house  to  house  with 
them  to  collect  the  tax  arrears.  When  the  president  heard  this,  he  said  it 
was  impossible.  First,  no  one  would  go  with  him  as  a  committee  member  to 
collect  the  tax.  Second,  even  if  someone  would  go  with  him,  no  one  would 
pay  the  tax.  The  president  said,  and  others  agreed,  that  the  government 
should  send  an  official  to  collect  the  tax. 

At  this  point  a  young  village  man  on  his  way  for  water  stopped  by  to 
hear  what  the  discussion  was  about.  When  the  president  saw  him,  he  told  the 
VLW  that  he  would  ask  this  man  to  pay  the  tax.  Everyone  thought  that  the 
man  would  refuse  to  pay  and  thus  they  would  be  proved  correct.  But,  to 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  289 

everyone's  surprise,  the  man  took  out  a  ten-rupee  note,  threw  it  before  the 
president,  and  said,  "Now  what  do  you  think  of  me!"  Everyone  laughed.  A 
receipt  for  his  Rs.  6  and  the  change  were  returned  to  him,  and  he  went  on 
his  way.  This  incident  embarrassed  the  members,  and  the  VLW  immediately 
started  putting  down  the  names  of  the  committee  members — all  the  men 
present  except  two  of  the  outside  members. 

The  fourth  item,  consideration  of  voluntary  labor  in  die  village,  was  taken 
up.  The  VLW  suggested  that  the  villagers  should  repair  the  trail  from 
Sirkanda  to  the  valley  (five  miles)  and  should  work  for  one  week,  beginning 
the  first  of  January.  Members  suggested  repairing  local  trails,  but  had  diffi- 
culty deciding  which  to  repair.  Objection  to  repairing  the  trail  to  the  valley 
was  based  on  the  fact  that  it  is  used  by  people  of  other  villages  who  would 
thus  be  benefiting  from  the  labor  of  Sirkanda  without  contributing  to  it. 
Members  also  complained  that  once  before  they  had  done  voluntary  labor 
on  trails  with  the  understanding  that  they  would  be  paid  for  it  and,  although 
they  worked  hard,  no  payment  was  forthcoming.  The  VLW  pointed  out  that 
this  was  probably  a  trick  some  official  played  on  them  to  get  them  to  work 
and,  in  any  event,  they  should  be  satisfied  with  the  achievement  and  not 
demand  money.  The  members  still  objected.  They  claimed  that  the  residents 
of  a  neighboring  village  got  money  for  working  on  their  own  village  trail 
once.  Finally  they  agreed  to  work  on  two  short  trails  used  only  by  Sirkanda 
villagers  (and  rarely  by  them)  for  one  week,  starting  in  three  days. 

The  fifth  item,  opening  of  a  night  school,  was  then  read  by  the  VLW. 
Everyone  said  that  it  was  useless  to  have  a  night  school,  since  no  one  would 
attend  it.  It  had  been  tried  by  a  teacher  here  once  and  failed.  The  matter 
was  dropped. 

The  VLW  then  read  the  sixth  item.  It  concerned  sending  five  villagers  to 
a  training  session  on  better  methods  of  farming  to  be  held  in  Sirkanda  at 
some  future  date.  This  was  met  with  considerable  incredulity  and  banter. 
When  one  member,  who  had  retired  to  a  nearby  shop  for  tea,  was  hailed 
and  told  that  he  would  be  sent  to  school  to  learn  to  farm,  he  replied  that 
he  had  done  that  every  day  of  his  life.  It  was  suggested  that  the  blacksmith 
be  sent.  He  objected  that  he  had  never  held  a  plow  in  his  life  and  owned 
not  a  foot  of  land.  Finally  five  people,  including  one  not  present,  were  put 
down  for  this  program. 

Next  the  VLW  turned  to  a  discussion  of  work  to  be  done  according  to  the 
government's  second  five-year  plan  for  the  village.  According  to  that  plan, 
he  said,  the  village  was  supposed  to  construct  a  community  center  during  the 
year.  He  described  the  advantages  and  uses  of  such  a  building:  meetings 
could  be  held  indoors;  it  could  be  used  for  housing  visitors;  it  could  be  used 
at  weddings;  the  village  would  be  entitled  to  a  free  public  radio  to  be  placed 
in  it.  At  this  point  a  member  quipped  that  the  blacksmith  (one  of  the  most 
avid  listeners  to  the  anthropologist's  radio)  would  then  not  need  to  buy  a 
radio.  This  brought  laughter.  The  VLW  pointed  out  that  the  government 
would  give  the  village  Rs.  800  for  the  community  center,  an  amount  consti- 
tuting 40  per  cent  of  the  total  cost  of  such  a  building,  according  to  estimates 


2gO  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

submitted  by  this  panchayat  a  few  years  before.  Members  requested  the  VLW 
to  get  them  Rs.  1000  and  they  would  construct  the  building  with  that  money 
alone  and  spend  nothing  of  their  own.  The  VLW  insisted  that  it  would  not 
be  difficult  to  raise  the  money  in  the  village.  The  members  were  dubious. 
One  man  commented,  "If  people  were  like  that  [willing  to  donate  labor 
and  money],  would  the  water  supply  now  be  in  bad  condition,  and  would 
the  village  trails  be  so  rough?"  Someone  asked  how  much  the  anthropologist 
would  contribute.  I  replied,  "As  much  voluntary  labor  as  anyone  else  gives," 
a  response  which  evoked  considerable  merriment.  Finally  the  president  said 
he  would  give  Rs.  50.  Another  man  said  he  would  contribute  only  if  the 
center  were  to  be  constructed  in  the  central  settlement  area  where  it  could 
be  useful  at  times  of  marriages.  An  argument  developed  as  to  the  best  location, 
the  local  shopkeeper  coming  out  and  arguing  that  it  should  be  outside  the 
main  village  in  view  of  the  fact  that  strangers  might  use  it  sometimes.  [It 
later  developed  that  he  had  a  vested  interest  in  this  suggestion.  He  hoped 
to  get  the  panchayat  to  buy  the  other  shop  as  a  community  center,  thus 
eliminating  his  business  competition.]  Nothing  could  be  agreed  upon,  and 
the  matter  was  postponed  to  a  future  meeting. 

Next  a  letter  from  the  schoolteacher  was  read,  stating  that  according  to 
Education  Department  rules  all  children  between  the  ages  of  6  and  12 
should  be  in  school.  It  urged  all  villagers  to  comply  with  this  rule.  The 
president  turned  to  one  member  and  said,  "Why  isn't  your  son  in  school?" 
The  reply  was,  "Those  rules  are  meant  for  children  that  don't  have  anything 
else  to  do  and  spend  their  time  idly  at  home;  my  boy  herds  cattle."  One 
villager  supported  the  teacher's  letter,  saying,  "They  didn't  have  such  facili- 
ties in  this  village  when  we  were  young,  so  here  we  are  signing  these  registers 
with  our  thumbprints.  We  should  send  the  children  to  school  so  that  they 
will  be  able  to  do  better  than  we  do." 

The  next  matter  was  an  announcement  by  the  VLW  that  the  council 
owed  Rs.  12.50  to  the  Block  Development  Office.  The  amount  was  made  up  of 
Rs.  10  as  contribution  for  an  Extension  Exhibition  to  be  held  in  a  town  in 
the  valley,  Rs.  2  for  some  sort  of  training  school  held  there,  and  half  a  rupee 
for  a  booklet  on  village  councils.  The  president  said  it  would  be  paid  from 
funds  on  hand,  though  no  one  knew  anything  about  these  matters. 

Next  the  economic  cooperative  supervisor,  who  had  joined  the  meeting, 
asked  the  VLW  to  take  up  the  seventh  item  on  the  agenda:  formation  of  a 
credit  cooperative  society  in  Sirkanda.  This  the  VLW  did,  explaining  the 
advantages  of  such  a  society  and  of  cooperatives  in  general.  He  told  his 
listeners  that  a  society  had  already  been  registered  for  Sirkanda  on  the  basis 
of  work  done  by  a  former  government  employee  who  had  visited  this  area 
and  had  secured  their  approval  of  such  a  plan.  He  urged  them  to  buy  shares. 
He  read  the  names  of  those  who  had  been  recorded  by  the  previous  officer 
as  being  interested.  No  one  wanted  to  buy.  Finally  two  shares  each  were 
recorded  in  the  names  of  the  president  and  another  man,  and  one  share  each 
in  the  names  of  the  shopkeeper  and  the  blacksmith,  over  the  latter's  loud 
protests  of  insolvency.  No  payments  were  made  on  these  shares.  A  villager 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  2gi 

who  was  not  present  was  listed  as  president  of  the  cooperative,  and  one  of 
those  present  was  designated  its  treasurer.  None  of  the  group  showed  any 
interest  at  all  in  this  item. 

The  VLW  then  passed  the  register  around  for  signatures,  the  last  official 
act  of  the  meeting.  Two  additional  members  had  come  for  this  event,  and 
two  of  the  original  seven  had  left,  and  so  a  total  of  seven  members  and  one 
nonmember  signed.  The  meeting  was  over  at  5  p.m. 

As  the  members  left,  the  VLW  made  a  plea  for  the  purchase  of  National 
Savings  Certificates  as  part  of  the  government's  small  savings  program.  By 
the  time  he  finished  he  was  talking  to  the  anthropologist  and  his  interpreter 
only,  all  others  having  departed. 

Not  one  of  the  suggestions  or  decisions  for  positive  action  coming 
out  of  this  meeting  was  ever  acted  upon.  The  lack  of  success  of  this 
meeting,  as  of  village  self-government  and  government  programs  in 
general  in  this  area,  lies  in  part  in  the  fact  that  it  did  not  contain 
much  of  real  interest  to  villagers.  Of  the  six  items  proposed  for  action, 
only  item  2,  having  to  do  with  the  water  supply,  was  of  any  real 
interest  to  members.  Of  four  additional  subjects  discussed,  only  one, 
that  concerning  the  community  center,  was  of  interest  to  villagers. 
Even  more  important  is  the  uniformly  negative  attitude  of  villagers 
toward  the  government  and  everything  associated  with  it,  including 
the  village  level  worker  who  called  the  meeting,  the  council  itself, 
and  every  item  on  the  agenda.  This  attitude  and  related  matters  are 
discussed  in  the  following  chapter. 

In  summary,  the  meeting  was  an  utter  failure  at  accomplishing  its 
ostensible  purpose — that  of  contributing  to  village  uplift  and  improve- 
ment in  conformance  with  the  goals  of  the  government's  second  five- 
year  plan.  In  accomplishing  immediate  ends,  which  were  evidently 
also  the  ultimate  ends  of  those  who  called  it,  it  was  an  eminent  success. 
Every  item  of  business  was  completed  with  some  kind  of  action  re- 
corded or  with  appropriately  filled-in  lists  of  names,  volunteers,  or 
pledges  of  funds.  It  was  a  paper  success  and  from  the  point  of  view  of 
the  village  level  worker  and  council  president,  that  meant  a  real 
success.  From  the  point  of  view  of  the  villagers,  it  was  a  good  meeting 
too  because  it  satisfied  the  officials  with  a  minimum  of  interference  in 
village  affairs.  Only  the  schoolteacher  considered  it  a  farce  and  a 
failure,  accurately  predicting  that  nothing  would  come  of  any  of  the 
discussions  held  or  decisions  made.  Not  one  of  the  decisions  to  act  on 
matters  raised  at  the  council  meeting  was  followed  through  as  planned. 
Discussion  of  this  phase  appears  on  pp.  319-320.  Many  villagers  stayed 
away  from  the  meeting,  convinced  that  it  would  be  a  meaningless  waste 
of  time,  thus  helping  fulfill  their  own  prophecy.  The  meeting  was  a 


20,2  THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY 

typical  example  of  reactions  to  government-sponsored  local  self-govern- 
ment and  other  programs  in  this  area.  In  fact,  there  are  villages  in 
Bhatbair  which  are  considerably  more  hostile  to  such  programs  than 
is  Sirkanda — villages  in  which  the  meeting  would,  in  all  probability, 
have  been  boycotted  entirely. 

Some  indication  of  the  significance  of  the  ineffectiveness  of  village 
self-government  such  as  that  reported  here  and  elsewhere  can  be  de- 
rived from  an  examination  of  the  attitude  of  the  government  of  India 
toward  village  government: 

The  Planning  Commission  clearly  acknowledges  that  rural  progress  de- 
pends entirely  on  the  existence  of  an  active  village  organization  which  can 
bring  all  the  people,  including  those  at  the  bottom  of  the  social  and  eco- 
nomic ladder,  into  common  programs  and  activities,  using  assistance  from 
the  Government,  and  their  own  contributions  in  labor,  cash  and  kind. 

Further,  India  feels  keenly  that  the  nation's  strength  as  a  democracy  de- 
pends to  a  most  important  degree  on  building,  in  hundreds  of  thousands  of 
villages,  effective  local  governments  through  which  the  people  can,  as  respon- 
sible citizens,  plan  and  participate  in  their  own  and  the  nation's  progress. 
(Planning  Commission,  1958,  p.  123) 

Judicial  Council 

Above  the  village  government  is  a  body  locally  known  as  "judicial 
council"  (adalat  panchayat,  now  officially  known  as  Nyaya  Panchayat). 
This  has  jurisdiction  over  a  number  of  villages.  In  this  area  one 
judicial  council  has  jurisdiction  over  most  of  Bhatbair  and  a  few 
neighboring  villages.  The  functions  of  this  council  are  unknown  to 
most  villagers.  Many  think  that  when  its  name  is  used  the  speaker  is 
referring  to  the  former  constituency  of  the  village  council.  The  judicial 
council  is  made  up  of  a  total  of  five  individuals  chosen  from  among 
five  (or  fewer)  individuals  elected  by  each  village  assembly  within  its 
jurisdiction.  Those  elected  may  not  also  be  members  of  a  village  coun- 
cil. The  composition  of  the  judicial  council  varies  on  a  rotating  basis 
with  each  meeting.  This  council  is  presided  over  by  a  headman  from 
among  its  membership.  One  Sirkanda  man  has  been  headman  of  this 
council,  and  two  Sirkanda  men  are  currently  members.  This  council 
has  the  benefit  of  a  petty  government  official,  the  "panchayat  secretary," 
to  advise  it,  keep  records,  and  so  on.  Five  members  are  supposed  to 
meet  weekly  at  its  headquarters,  a  good-sized  village  on  the  edge  of 
the  valley.  In  reality,  it  meets  relatively  infrequently  because  it  has 
not  enough  business  to  warrant  such  frequent  meetings.  It  has  wide 
judicial  powers  in  deciding  disputes  and  breaches  of  law  which  would 


THE    VILLAGE    COMMUNITY  293 

otherwise  have  to  go  into  the  law  courts,  or  which  have  been  referred 
down  to  it  by  courts  of  law.  It  is  legally  defined  as  a  "court"  and  its 
members  are  "judges."  It  can  fine  those  who  appear  before  it,  or  refer 
their  cases  to  higher  courts.  It  is,  therefore,  a  potentially  powerful 
body.  In  practice  it  is  avoided  when  possible  by  those  with  grievances 
because  of  their  fear  of  the  nonobjectivity  of  its  decisions.  One  villager 
commented: 

It  has  never  solved  a  single  case  since  it  began.  The  members  are  mostly 
dishonest  and  unscrupulous,  and  any  who  aren't  are  in  an  ineffectual  minor- 
ity. They  listen  to  the  man  who  feeds  them  well  or  does  them  favors.  They 
are  not  partial  to  caste  so  much  as  to  favors.  In  this  respect  they  are  just  like 
all  other  panchayats.  Panchayats  would  be  all  right  if  they  were  honestly 
and  impartially  run,  but  they  never  are. 


THE  OUTSIDE  WORLD: 
URBAN  CONTACTS  AND 
GOVERNMENT  PROGRAMS 


Mp\\\\\  The  Pahari  village  is  always  incomplete  in  the  goods,  services,  and 

personnel  necessary  to  its  functioning.  These  are  accessible,  to  a  great 
extent,  within  a  larger  surrounding  area  which  includes  several  vil- 
lages and  is  characterized  by  cultural  unity,  frequent  social  interaction, 
and  economic  and  ritual  interdependence.  We  have  seen  in  previous 
chapters  that  for  Sirkanda  this  unit  comprises  the  surrounding  hill  area 
(Bhatbair  and  a  corresponding  area  to  the  east)  within  a  four-air-mile 
or  eight-trail-mile  radius,  a  half-day's  journey  (see  map  2).  This  area 
contains  some  60  villages  and  settlements  and  around  5,000  people. 
It  is  the  area  within  which  all  the  castes  and  occupational  specialists 
necessary  to  the  economy  are  found.  It  is,  therefore,  the  area  over 
which  artisans  move  to  perform  their  duties  and  collect  their  payments. 
In  it  are  also  merchants  who  serve  as  important  sources  of  goods  from 
the  outside  and  as  markets  for  local  goods.  All  Sirkanda  lands  are 
found  in  this  area.  Within  the  area  all  the  necessary  religious  practi- 
tioners are  to  be  found — Brahmins,  ceremonial  cooks,  shamans,  pujaris, 
exorcists,  rope-sliders.  It  is  the  area  within  which  most  (83  per  cent) 
Sirkanda  marriages  take  place,  and  therefore  within  which  consan- 
guineal  and  affinal  kin  ties  are  concentrated.  As  a  result  it  is  the 
largest  area  within  which  visiting  frequently  occurs.  It  is  the  maximal 
area  over  which  most  women  have  traveled  in  their  lives.  Within  this 
area  castes  which  may  number  only  one  or  a  few  families  in  a  village 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  295 

find  caste-fellows  for  ritual  participation  and  moral  support.  In  this 
area  are  found  not  only  the  formal  and  informal  councils  for  local 
self-government  and  the  judicial  councils,  but  the  local  representatives 
of  the  state  and  national  governments — the  teachers,  village  level 
workers,  economic  cooperative  supervisors,  and  forestry  officers.  Into 
this  area  come  the  land  records  officers,  tax  collectors,  police,  and  others 
with  whom  villagers  must  deal.  In  the  past  local  officials  such  as  the 
mukhia,  lambardar,  and  sayana  had  their  jurisdiction  within  this  area. 

In  short,  while  the  village  is  a  real,  functional  unit,  the  immediate 
culture  area — that  which  can  be  reached  in  half  a  day — is  the  more 
nearly  self-sufficient  unit.  Every  village  within  this  area  relies  upon 
other  villages  for  many  of  the  necessary  elements  of  village  life.  It  is 
this  area  within  which  we  find  most  of  the  "extensions"  of  the  village 
as  discussed  by  Opler  (1956).  Here  is  found  the  "rural  cosmopolitan- 
ism" among  villages  mentioned  by  Lewis  (1958,  p.  320).  In  relation  to 
the  outside  there  is,  among  the  villages  in  this  area,  a  corresponding 
"rural  isolationism." 

However,  even  this  immediate  cultural  area  is  not  isolated  nor  in- 
dependent. It  is  in  constant  contact  with  similar  neighboring  areas  of 
the  hills.  In  fact,  it  is  an  area  primarily  from  the  point  of  view  of 
those  villages  toward  its  center.  Villages  on  the  peripheries  are  seen 
by  their  residents  as  the  centers  of  other,  overlapping  areas,  just  as 
they  are  the  centers  of  other,  overlapping  marriage  networks  unless 
important  cultural  boundaries  hem  them  in.  Moreover,  such  areas, 
including  the  one  surrounding  Sirkanda,  are  in  constant  contact  with 
the  valley  and  especially  with  urban  centers  such  as  Dehra  Dun  and 
the  hill  town  of  Mussoorie.  Many  goods  and  services  must  come  to 
these  hill  areas  directly  or  indirectly  from  outside.  Villagers  often  go 
outside  to  obtain  goods  and  services  rather  than  obtaining  them 
through  intermediaries.  Sometimes,  as  in  the  licensing  of  firearms,  they 
must  go  outside.  Authority  over  the  people  of  the  area  rests  ultimately 
with  outside  law  and  outside  government  located  in  Dehra  Dun  and 
Mussoorie.  Higher  education,  certain  religious  activities,  and  some 
kinds  of  diversion  are  available  only  outside  the  area.  People  who 
live  within  the  area  feel  the  effects  of  the  outside  world  in  the  presence 
of  outsiders  in  their  villages,  in  communication  with  outsiders,  and 
in  their  own  trips  to  the  outside. 

Levels  of  Identification 

In  discussing  outside  contacts  it  is  necessary  to  define  the  "out- 
side," for  several  levels  of  contact  and  identification  are  pertinent.  Sub- 


296 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 


groups  within  the  community — the  family,  sib,  clan,  caste,  and  village 
— have  already  been  discussed  at  some  length,  and  these  are  funda- 
mental units  of  individual  identification  and  orientation.  In  this  chap- 
ter the  discussion  will  be  in  broader  terms.  Bhatbair  (including  the 
adjoining  area  in  Tehri  Garhwal)  will  be  considered  to  be  the  "inside" 
as  distinguished  from  the  "outside"  world.  It  is  the  unit  within  which 


Fig.  6.  Levels  of  identification  and  interaction,  showing  relative  inclusiveness 
of  individual's  membership-identification  groups.  Significant  groups  are  en- 
closed within  numbered  areas.  Broken  lines  indicate  less  clearly  delineated 
groups. 


Key: 
1. 

2. 

3- 
4- 

5- 


7.  Sib 


Ego 

Nuclear  family 

Extended  family  (household) 
Lineage  (or  minimal  lineage) 
Kindred  (affinal  kin  follow  a 
pattern  similar  to  that  of  kin- 
dred but  not  coextensive  with 

it) 
6.  Maximal   lineage    (where   ap- 
plicable) 

Clan  is  indicated  by  diagonal  hatchures.  Wives  (and  other  local  affiliates)  of 
ego's  sib  are  indicated  by  cross  hatchures  within  the  clan  but  outside  the  sib. 

Note  that  cliques  (10)  do  not  divide  extended  families  (3)  nor  do  they  extend 
out  of  the  village  (11),  but  they  do  divide  lineage  (4),  kindred  (5),  maximal 
lineage  (6),  sib  (7),  and  caste  (8  and  9).  Caste  as  a  marriage  network  (8)  includes 
all  kin  (1-7),  and  excludes  some  clique,  village,  and  Bhatbair  people  (10-12). 


9- 
10. 
11. 
12. 

13- 
14. 

15- 


Caste  as  a  marriage  network 

Caste  as  a  named  group 

Clique 

Village 

Bhatbair  and  vicinity 

Garhwal 

Pahari  area 

India 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  297 

Sirkanda  residents  feel  entirely  at  home.  Beyond  it  they  are,  to  vary- 
ing degrees,  "outside" — in  alien  territory,  among  people  different  from 
themselves. 

Nearest  to  the  residents  of  Bhatbair,  in  terms  of  cultural  distance, 
are  the  residents  of  adjacent  Pahari  areas  to  the  east — people  who  speak 
essentially  the  same  dialect,  dress  in  much  the  same  way,  share  many 
of  the  same  beliefs  and  values.  These  are  areas  from  which  marriage 
partners  are  occasionally  obtained,  in  which  distant  relatives  live,  to 
which  local  people  are  sometimes  invited  for  ritual  observances  and 
fairs.  These  are  the  areas  to  which  Sirkanda  people  trace  their  own 
ancestry.  Rivalry  and  animosities  occasionally  crop  up,  as  when  a 
council  meeting  was  held  to  decide  a  dispute  arising  out  of  insults 
exchanged  between  two  men  of  the  same  caste,  one  from  Bhatbair  and 
one  from  an  area  to  the  east.  Each  area  supported  its  man,  and  the 
council  had  wide  representation  from  villages  in  each  area.  More 
commonly,  good-natured  insults  and  banter  are  exchanged  between  the 
residents  of  these  areas.  Bhatbair  people  used  to  call  their  neighbors  in 
Tehri  Garhwal  "slaves"  because  they  were  under  the  Raja's  absolute 
power.  Now  the  shoe  is  on  the  other  foot  and  the  taunting  goes  the 
other  way,  as  the  former  subjects  of  the  Raja  allegedly  have  more 
forest  and  land  at  their  disposal. 

More  significant  differences  and  loyalties  are  those  associated  with 
more  prominent  cultural  boundaries.  The  residents  of  Jaunpur,  a  hill 
area  north  of  Bhatbair  (and  not  identical  in  extent  to  the  area  which 
the  government  designates  by  this  term),  dress  somewhat  differently, 
build  houses  in  a  slightly  different  style,  and  in  general  bear  cultural 
differences  noticeable  to  both  groups.  Mutual  suspicion  becomes 
prominent  at  this  level.  Jaunpur  women  are  thought  to  be  given  to 
witchcraft  by  people  in  Bhatbair,  and,  although  wives  are  occasionally 
obtained  or  given  across  this  boundary,  it  is  done  with  some  trepidation. 

Where  linguistic  and  social  traits  are  significantly  different  and  dis- 
tances are  too  great  to  permit  accurate  appraisal  of  the  residents  of 
two  areas,  feelings  are  even  stronger.  The  polyandrous  people  of 
Jaunsar-Bawar,  though  recognized  as  fellow  Paharis,  are  considered 
immoral,  treacherous,  and  given  to  evil  magic  and  witchcraft.  Wives 
are  not  exchanged  with  them,  travel  to  the  area  is  avoided,  and  most 
information  about  them  is  in  the  nature  of  inaccurate  gossip.  Residents 
of  a  Pahari  area  some  distance  to  the  southeast  are  thought  of  in  a 
somewhat  similar  light.  At  this  level  dialectal  differences  become  im- 
portant. Jokes  are  frequently  told  which  ridicule  the  alien  dialect. 
One  probably  apocryphal  story  concerns  a  man  of  Bhatbair  who 
allegedly  went  to  a  village  to  the  southeast  to  see  about  making  mar- 
riage arrangements  for  his  nephew: 


2g8  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

In  (he  alien  village  he  overheard  the  brother  of  the  prospective  bride 
make  a  statement  to  his  mother  which,  in  the  dialect  of  that  region,  meant 
"The  buffalo  is  ready  to  be  milked,"  but  to  the  visitor  it  sounded  like,  "I 
am  ready  to  have  sexual  intercourse."  The  mother  replied,  "Then  untie  the 
calf,"  which  in  the  visitor's  dialect  meant,  "Then  untie  your  loincloth." 
Shocked  and  frightened  to  hear  a  man  speak  in  this  unseemly  fashion  to  his 
mother  and  to  receive  such  a  reply  from  her,  the  visitor  ran  out  of  the 
village,  headed  for  home.  The  dismayed  family  shouted  after  him,  "Stay, 
for  tomorrow  we  will  kill  a  goat  to  feast  on,"  which  only  served  to  accelerate 
his  departure,  as  in  his  dialect  it  meant,  "Stay,  for  tomorrow  we  will  engage 
in  sodomy." 

Despite  differences  in  beliefs  and  attitudes  with  distance,  there  is 
recognition  of  cultural  similarities  among  Paharis.  A  Pahari  is  a  more 
congenial  stranger  than  is  a  non-Pahari;  he  is  more  easily  understood 
and  can  be  more  readily  placed  in  terms  of  the  relatively  closed  social 
system  indigenous  to  this  area.  Common  language,  culture,  and  history 
result  in  a  kind  of  incipient  Pahari  group  consciousness.  The  fact  that 
Paharis  are  considered  and  treated  as  a  group  by  non-Paharis  may  also 
be  a  factor.  So  far  this  consciousness  is  largely  in  negative  terms  at 
the  broader  levels;  the  differences  between  Paharis  and  non-Paharis 
are  more  important  than  the  similarities  and  common  interests  among 
Paharis.  However,  there  is  some  agitation  for  a  separate  hill  state  in 
Pahari  regions  to  the  west.  Among  educated  Paharis  of  Garhwal  and 
Tehri  Garhwal  there  is  considerable  pride  of  origin,  with  local  societies 
and  even  publications  in  some  urban  areas  stressing  the  heritage  of 
Garhwal. 

Paharis  distinguish  themselves  terminologically  from  plains  and  valley 
people  who  are  called  desi  (native).  Foreigners  are  even  farther  re- 
moved and  are  called  pardesl  (foreign).  Representatives  of  either  group 
are  suspect,  threatening,  and  somewhat  baffling  to  Paharis.  In  an  iso- 
lated area  which  stresses  kin,  caste,  and  community  affiliation  they  are 
simply  outside  the  system.  To  fit  them  into  it  is  usually  an  impossible 
task;  hence  the  traditional  unfriendliness  with  which  Paharis  greet 
strangers.  The  usual  reaction  to  them  is  avoidance.  Inevitable  contacts 
with  them  are  kept  as  short  and  impersonal  as  possible.  Plains  people 
are,  of  course,  better  known  and  better  understood  than  foreigners, 
but  in  their  presence  Paharis  feel  ill  at  ease.  The  plains  person  is 
considered  to  be  sophisticated  and  well-off,  to  have  a  superiority  com- 
plex, and  to  be  arrogant,  untrustworthy,  avaricious,  and  immoral. 
These  attitudes  are  not  born  of  recent  contacts.  In  1828  Traill  (1828, 
pp.  217  f.)  noted  that  "all  mountaineers  unite  in  an  excessive  distrust 
of  the  natives  of  the  low  country,  whom  they  regard  as  a  race  of 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  299 

swindlers  and  extortioners.  .  .  ."  One  present-day  Pahari  who  had 
been  to  Delhi  commented,  "I  don't  like  Delhi  or  any  of  those  places. 
There  are  too  many  people  there  and  they  make  fun  of  us.  I  like 
Dehra  Dun  where  you  can  always  see  lots  of  Paharis  around."  Sirkanda 
people  feel  that  they  can  size  up  a  Pahari,  but  a  plains  person  or  a 
foreigner  is  an  unknown  quantity:  "You  can't  tell  how  much  water 
they're  standing  in." 

Concerning  Europeans  there  are  conflicting  stereotypes.  One  set  of 
stereotypes,  based  upon  observation  and  stories  of  British  soldiers,  views 
them  as  immoral  scoundrels.  Another,  based  upon  the  reputation  of 
the  British  civil  servants,  views  them  as  stern,  cold,  and  distant  but 
honest  and  fair.  A  third,  based  upon  closer  observation  of  individuals 
(customers  for  milk,  occasional  hunters  and  hikers),  views  them  as  well- 
meaning  but  odd.  One  villager  commented, 

Englishmen  [that  is,  "white  people"]  are  very  strange.  They  always  cooper- 
ate with  one  another  and  never  dispute  among  themselves,  but  their  anger 
is  easily  aroused.  Their  customs  are  strange.  If  one  of  them  comes  to  a  village 
he  does  not  enter  it  and  ask  for  a  place  to  stay,  but  pitches  his  tent  alone, 
outside  the  village.  They  do  not  care  what  their  food  tastes  like;  they  use 
no  spices  but  just  put  a  pinch  of  salt  on  it  and  gobble  it  up.  They  eat  mostly 
from  cans.  They  never  take  off  their  shoes — even  if  one  were  going  to  climb 
a  tree  he  would  do  it  with  his  shoes  on.  They  also  have  immoral  sexual 
customs. 

It  is  usually  assumed  that  foreigners  (other  than  hunters)  who  come 
to  the  mountains  are  missionaries,  government  officials,  or  spies.  All  of 
these  pose  a  threat.  One  foreigner  came  through  the  village  several 
years  ago  riding  a  horse  and  carrying  a  pistol.  He  stopped  for  tea  and 
then  passed  on.  He  is  assumed  to  this  day  to  have  been  a  spy.  Aside 
from  occasional  military  personnel,  he  is  said  to  have  been  the  only 
foreigner  to  come  to  Sirkanda. 


The  Non-Pahari  World 

The  non-Pahari  world  impinges  upon  Sirkanda  and  the  surround- 
ing villages  in  many  ways.  Although  the  degree  to  which  it  does  so 
has  apparently  increased  since  Independence,  such  contacts  are  not 
new.  From  earliest  times  traders,  ascetics,  pilgrims,  and  immigrants 
have  traveled  from  the  plains  to  this  area.  Tibetans  or  Bhotiyas  have 
come  from  the  high  country  to  the  north  to  pasture  their  sheep  in  the 
winter.  There  has  been  outside  authority — the  Garhwal  Raja,  the 
Nepalese,  the  British,  the  "Congress  government."  This  authority  has 


gOO  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

been  represented  to  villagers  largely  by  its  soldiers,  police,  and  tax 
collectors. 

The  British  found  the  hills  especially  useful  as  a  place  for  summer 
rest  areas,  military  cantonments,  encampments,  and  maneuvers.  They 
established  the  famous  "hill  stations,"  such  as  Simla,  Mussoorie,  Naini 
Tal,  Darjeeling,  and  military  cantonments,  such  as  Chakrata  and 
Ranikhet.  The  "Tommy"  (British  soldier)  gained  the  same  reputation 
for  arrogance  and  immorality  that  he  gained  over  most  of  India  and 
that  soldiers  have  had  from  time  immemorial  among  the  civilian 
populations  near  which  they  have  lived. 

Before  the  beginning  of  World  War  I  a  small  summer  rest  camp 
was  set  up  by  the  army  a  little  over  a  mile  from  Sirkanda.  There  small 
contingents  of  Nepalese  troops  and  their  British  officers  came  during 
the  hot  season.  Although  they  were  rigidly  segregated  from  all  vil- 
lagers except  the  family  which  sold  them  milk,  and  had  no  conflicts 
with  the  villagers,  their  presence  was  felt.  The  army  bought  village 
land,  was  a  customer  for  village  milk,  and  its  presence  restricted  the 
movement  of  villagers,  especially  women,  in  the  vicinity  of  the  camp. 

World  War  I  found  many  Garhwalis,  including  a  few  from  Bhatbair 
and  one  from  Sirkanda,  enlisting  in  the  Garhwal  Rifles  to  fight  for 
the  British.  Sirkanda  people  still  sing  the  song  and  proudly  recount 
the  tale  of  a  Garhwali  hero  who  took  command  of  his  unit  when  all 
its  officers  had  been  killed  and  led  it  to  victory  in  a  crucial  battle. 
His  widow  resides  in  her  husband's  village  on  a  comfortable  pension 
from  the  government,  and  this  too  is  a  point  of  pride  among  Paharis 
of  the  region. 

In  the  1920's  several  Sirkanda  boys  attended  school  in  nearby  vil- 
lages of  the  valley,  two  or  three  reaching  the  eighth  class.  They  were 
the  first  from  this  area  to  be  educated.  When  the  army  abandoned  the 
summer  encampment  near  Sirkanda  in  the  early  1930's,  the  resulting 
intravillage  court  case  over  ownership  of  the  land  lasted  nine  years. 
It  necessitated  extended  trips  by  several  villagers  to  courts  as  far 
away  as  Allahabad.  During  this  period  a  merchant  from  the  valley 
was  called  in  to  run  a  competing  shop  in  the  village,  and  he  has  re- 
mained to  the  present. 

Throughout  these  times  adult  male  villagers  occasionally  went  on 
pilgrimages  to  the  shrines  of  the  high  Himalayas,  to  Hardwar  or  to 
distant  Gaya  in  Bihar.  Boys  and  young  men,  then  as  now,  occasionally 
left  home  to  seek  adventure  in  the  plains,  usually  returning  after  a 
few  months. 

World  War  II  brought  further  army  recruitment,  with  two  Sirkanda 
men  among  half  a  dozen  Bhatbair  volunteers.  The  Sirkanda  volunteers 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  3OI 

saw  much  of  northern  India  in  their  service  but  did  not  go  outside 
India. 

Independence  affected  Sirkanda  relatively  slightly.  The  partition  of 
India  which  accompanied  it  brought  bands  of  fleeing  Muslims  and 
pursuing  Hindus  through  these  hills,  but  for  the  most  part  Sirkanda 
was  not  involved.  Bhatbair  residents  refused  sanctuary  to  Muslims  of 
the  valley  out  of  fear  of  the  marauding  Sikhs  who  were  pursuing  them. 
However,  they  withheld  information  from  the  Sikhs  about  Muslim 
movements  and  helped  the  Bhatbair  Muslim  family  to  remain  un- 
molested. In  nearby  Pahari  areas  fleeing  Muslims  were  looted  and 
occasionally  killed  as  they  passed.  One  Sirkanda  family  became  wealthy 
overnight  from  money  apparently  looted  from  a  Muslim  chan  left 
in  their  care. 

After  Independence  the  influence  of  the  government  of  India  was 
felt  increasingly.  Laws  regarding  use  of  forest  lands  were  altered  and, 
worse  yet,  enforced.  A  school  was  built  in  Sirkanda  and  various  govern- 
ment programs  had  their  effects  locally,  as  will  be  discussed  below. 
Government  representatives  in  the  village  have  become  an  increasingly 
familiar  sight  since  Independence.  A  schoolteacher  lives  in  the  village 
most  of  the  year;  two  other  officers  are  there  much  of  the  time.  Govern- 
ment survey  parties  on  training  exercises  have  often  camped  near  the 
village  during  the  hot  season,  providing  a  source  of  outside  companion- 
ship for  some  of  the  younger  men.  The  postal  service  now  reaches 
Sirkanda  with  a  postman  coming  through  about  once  every  two  months, 
while  letters  can  be  mailed  whenever  a  villager  or  passer-by  goes  to 
the  valley. 

Throughout  this  time  outside  markets  have  increased  in  importance. 
Milk  has  long  been  a  cash  product  to  be  sold  in  Dehra  Dun,  Mussoorie, 
and  the  smaller,  intermediate  markets  such  as  Nagal,  Rajpur,  Sahas 
Dhara,  and  Suakholi.  Mussoorie  has  been  a  market  for  over  100  years, 
Dehra  Dun  for  longer  than  that.  Rajpur  was  a  major  market  for  80 
years  until  a  motor  road  was  built  to  Mussoorie  in  1930  and  Rajpur 
ceased  to  be  an  important  way  station  en  route  to  Mussoorie.  As  better 
trails  have  been  built  in  the  Bhatbair  region  and  beyond  (beginning 
with  the  pack  trail  past  Sirkanda  built  by  the  Tehri  Garhwal  Raja 
in  1914),  and  as  horses  and  mules  have  been  acquired,  agricultural 
products  have  been  sold  with  increasing  frequency.  Potatoes  have  be- 
come an  important  cash  crop.  At  the  same  time,  more  goods  from  the 
outside  have  come  into  the  village — cloth  and  clothing,  utensils  and 
tools,  corrugated  iron  roofing,  tea,  cigarettes,  and  so  on.  Trips  to  the 
valley  and  Mussoorie  for  trade  have  become  commonplace.  Dehra  Dun 
has  been  increasingly  frequented  by  villagers  on  official  business  re- 


g02  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

lating  to  the  government.  Dehra  Dun  and  Mussoorie  have  the  added 
attraction  of  a  full  range  of  entertainment  facilities. 
An  85-year-old  man  commented: 

In  the  old  days  a  man  wore  a  loincloth  and  had  a  blanket  for  a  wrap. 
Now  everyone  has  to  have  a  wardrobe  of  three  coats,  three  shirts,  three 
pajamas,  and  shoes  and  many  other  things.  We  used  to  go  to  town  once  a 
year,  in  a  group,  to  buy  staples,  and  we  came  home  as  soon  as  we  were 
through.  Now  someone  goes  almost  every  week.  They  go  alone  and  don't 
even  tell  others  they're  going.  Sometimes  they  stay  for  a  day  or  two  and 
waste  money  on  the  cinema  or  prostitutes.  In  my  day  we  didn't  have  time, 
money,  nor  inclination  for  such  things. 

Occasionally  a  Vedic  doctor  is  consulted  in  town,  and  once  a  valu- 
able horse  was  taken  to  the  government  veterinary.  The  number  of 
boys  going  to  school  in  town  has  increased.  Two  young  Sirkanda  men 
have  taken  jobs  near  Delhi,  but  their  families  remain  in  the  village. 
Two  men  from  a  Pahari  village  nearer  Dehra  Dun  have  taken  jobs 
in  Dehra  Dun,  but  they  continue  to  live  in  their  village.  In  all  this 
time  no  one  from  Bhatbair  has  moved  permanently  into  Dehra  Dun 
or  Mussoorie.  When  villagers  go  to  Dehra  Dun  they  have  to  stay  over- 
night with  the  wholesalers  to  whom  they  sell  their  products,  or  in  a 
temple  compound  which  is  open  to  all.  In  Mussoorie  they  usually 
return  to  chans  before  nightfall.  There  are  no  relatives  or  fellow 
villagers  in  either  place  to  afford  them  a  place  to  stay. 

Limestone  quarrying  operations  have  penetrated  to  the  foot  of  the 
hills,  so  that  trucks  and  workers  operate  within  five  miles  of  Sirkanda 
and  are  pushing  farther  constantly.  Tourists  and  worshipers  come  in- 
creasingly to  the  temple  and  springs  at  Sahas  Dhara  five  miles  away 
now  that  a  dirt  road  enables  cars  to  reach  it.  Travel  to  Dehra  Dun  is 
facilitated  by  regular  and  inexpensive  bus  service  from  Rajpur  to 
Dehra  Dun,  cutting  the  16-mile  walk  from  Sirkanda  to  about  9  miles. 
The  Mussoorie-Tehri  trail  is  being  prepared  for  bus  service  so  that 
before  many  years  have  passed  the  walk  to  Mussoorie  will  be  cut  from 
16  to  8  miles. 

Therefore,  outside  contacts  have  been  increasing.  In  view  of  the 
changes  that  have  come  about  over  a  long  period,  it  is  perhaps  sur- 
prising that  Sirkanda  has  not  been  influenced  more  than  it  has  by 
these  contacts.  A  Rajput  householder  with  an  eighth-grade  education 
commented: 

The  reason  most  people  here  are  so  backward  is  that  they  are  uneducated 
and  they  have  never  been  outside  and  gotten  new  ideas.  You  have  to  go 
outside  to  learn  to  improve  yourself.  The  trouble  with  this  village  is  that 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  3°3 

people  aren't  educated — look  how  few  children  attend  school.  The  village  is 
accessible  enough  to  town  that  it  should  have  improved  but  it  hasn't,  while 
some  other  Pahari  areas  have  improved  greatly.  Even  some  government 
officers  are  Paharis,  but  none  come  from  around  here.  Here  people  don't 
know  enough  to  be  able  to  improve. 

Not  all  villagers  share  this  attitude  toward  the  outside.  Some  see  it 
as  a  contaminating  influence.  One  man  remarked: 

Contact  with  towns  has  been  bad  for  Pahari  villages.  Farther  up  in  the 
hills  the  people  are  better  off.  There  they  still  wear  simple  clothes  and  prac- 
tice the  old  customs  more  than  we  do.  They  are  freer.  Their  women  are  not 
ashamed  to  dance  and  sing  and  drink  with  the  men.  They  have  more  village 
celebrations.  They  are  content  with  what  they  have,  simple  though  it  is,  and 
many  of  them  are  wealthy  because  they  have  nothing  to  waste  their  money 
on.  We  are  better  off  in  this  respect  than  are  people  who  live  near  the  cities, 
but  the  people  farther  up  in  the  hills  are  better  off  than  we  are. 

One  reason  for  the  relative  isolation  of  Sirkanda  is  that  it  has 
nothing  to  attract  outsiders.  It  is  high  on  a  ridge  and  is  not  en  route 
to  any  place  of  interest  to  plains  people.  Unless  limestone  is  found  in 
its  immediate  vicinity,  it  is  likely  to  be  bypassed  for  a  long  time. 

Outside  influences  have  been  felt  in  Sirkanda  primarily  as  a  result 
of  direct,  personal  contact.  Villagers  who  have  taken  extended  trips 
outside  have  returned  to  tell  their  stories.  Some  villagers  make  frequent 
trips  to  market,  where  they  learn  the  current  news.  The  alien  merchant 
and  government  employees  have  added  their  experience.  Itinerant 
merchants  and  religious  practitioners  have  contributed,  too.  From  such 
contacts  villagers  have  acquired  some  idea  of  what  goes  on  in  the  out- 
side world.  They  are  familiar  with  Gandhi,  Nehru,  and  the  Congress 
party.  They  know  of  India's  difficulties  with  Pakistan  and  sympathize 
with  India  (or,  more  accurately,  they  are  anti-Muslim).  They  know 
something  of  the  struggle  between  Russia  and  the  United  States.  Cer- 
tain domestic  policies — land  reform,  Harijan  uplift — are  vaguely 
known.  New  developments — the  launching  of  Sputnik,  the  outlawing 
of  prostitution  in  Dehra  Dun — cause  comment  and  speculation.  Aware- 
ness of  and  interest  in  foreign  countries  and  other  parts  of  India  are 
very  limited.  Discussion  with  the  anthropologist  about  America  arose 
relatively  infrequently.  Villagers  usually  began  with  an  inquiry  as  to 
how  long  it  would  take  to  walk  there  and  proceeded  through  discus- 
sions of  the  price  of  consumer  goods,  productivity  of  land  and  animals, 
social  customs,  and  finally  sex  habits. 

Written  materials  and  mass  media  have  been  of  little  importance. 
Mail,  which  is  received  rarely,  consists  primarily  of  instructions  to  the 


304  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

council  or  of  personal  and  official  mail  for  the  teacher  and  other  out- 
siders in  the  village.  Villagers  who  go  outside  communicate  rarely  if 
at  all  with  their  relatives  in  Sirkanda.  There  are  no  periodicals  in  the 
village  and  no  books  other  than  the  school  materials  of  the  teacher  and 
a  few  largely  unread  religious  works.  The  only  current  documents 
are  posters  given  to  the  village  level  worker  or  the  village  president, 
urging  public  health  and  personal  hygiene  and  explaining  in  graphic 
detail  the  intricacies  of  the  change  to  the  decimal  system  of  coinage. 
There  has  been  no  functional  radio  in  Bhatbair,  although  one  was 
once  brought  to  a  Sirkanda  chan,  where  it  failed  to  operate.  One 
brought  by  the  anthropologist  attracted  an  interested  audience.  Film 
music  and  news  programs  were  the  favorite  radio  fare,  in  that  order. 
Newspapers  and  magazines  brought  to  the  village  aroused  little  in- 
terest aside  from  their  illustrations.  The  low  level  of  literacy  even 
among  those  who  claim  to  know  how  to  read  is  probably  largely  re- 
sponsible for  this  reception. 

Contacts  between  villagers  and  representatives  of  urban  culture  and 
the  "new  India"  will  probably  continue  to  take  place  primarily 
through  villagers'  trips  outside  and  through  government  representa- 
tives who  are  attempting  to  initiate  various  programs  in  this  and 
neighboring  hill  villages.  Governmental  programs  of  planned  change 
and  villagers'  responses  to  them  will  be  discussed  below. 

Urban  Contacts 

Urban  centers  are  important  to  Sirkanda  villagers  as  they  are  to 
all  peasants.  In  fact,  Redfield  (1957,  p.  31)  defines  peasantry  with 
reference  to  the  presence  of  cities,  stating  that  "there  were  no  peasants 
before  the  first  cities." 

In  Sirkanda  as  in  other  peasant  communities,  "the  account  the 
peasant  takes  of  the  city  or  town  is  economic,  political,  and  moral" 
(ibid.).  That  is,  he  carries  on  some  trade  in  the  city,  he  pays  his  taxes 
to  people  from  the  city,  he  is  subject  to  control  by  institutions  ema- 
nating from  the  city,  he  knows  something  of  city  ways,  and  in  fact 
adopts  some  values  of  urban  dwellers  as  his  own. 

The  sources  and  amounts  of  urban  influence  in  Sirkanda  are  varied. 
One  of  the  most  important  kinds  of  contact  is  that  of  direct,  personal 
experience.  This  varies  from  person  to  person.  Women  have  much  less 
urban  experience  than  do  men.  While  there  are  men  who  have  never 
been  to  Dehra  Dun,  others  go  every  few  weeks.  Of  116  men  in  Sirkanda, 
3  have  never  seen  Dehra  Dun,  62  have  seen  nothing  beyond  Dehra 
Dun  and  Mussoorie,  20  have  been  as  far  as  Hardwar  or  an  equivalent 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  305 

place  within  40  miles  and  bordering  the  hills  (such  as  Rishikesh  and 
Kalsi),  6  have  been  into  the  plains  but  only  as  far  as  one  of  the  smaller 
towns  or  cities  within  60  miles  of  Dehra  Dun  (Saharanpur,  Muzaf- 
farnagar,  Ambala),  15  have  been  as  far  as  Delhi  (150  miles),  8  have 
been  on  pilgrimage  to  Gaya  (750  miles),  1  has  been  to  Calcutta,  and  1 
has  been  over  most  of  North  India  in  the  army. 

Outside  employment,  discussed  in  chapter  2,  has  given  a  number  of 
villagers  firsthand  experience  with  city  life  for  months  at  a  time,  but 
no  one  has  moved  his  family  outside  and  only  one  man  has  taken  a 
lasting  job  outside  (another  who  recently  joined  him  may  be  the  second 
to  do  so).  The  general  opinion  of  city  life  is  that  it  is  easy,  entertaining, 
sinful,  and  expensive.  For  well-to-do  plains  people  it  is  fine,  but  it  is 
not  suitable  for  poor  Paharis.  One  Rajput,  apparently  referring  to 
emigration,  commented:  "Anyone  who  leaves  the  village  is  a  fool  be- 
cause here  he  is  a  king  but  there  he  is  a  slave."  Another,  referring  to 
short-term  visits,  objected  to  this  view,  saying,  "A  person  can  learn 
and  improve  himself  only  by  going  away  and  having  other  experiences. 
In  the  village  he  can  learn  nothing." 

The  one  Sirkanda  man  who  had  gone  out  and  made  a  success  of 
life  on  the  outside  was  pointed  to  with  pride  by  some  villagers,  al- 
though he  had  apparently  not  been  well  thought  of  at  the  time  of  his 
departure  and  he  left  as  the  result  of  a  family  dispute.  Disputes  were 
involved  in  many  cases  of  temporary  emigration  from  the  village. 
Niehoff  (1959,  p.  501)  comments  that  among  factory  workers  of  Kan- 
pur,  ".  .  .  the  push  from  the  village  was  stronger  than  the  pull  from 
the  city  and  the  factory."  The  rise  of  the  Sirkanda  emigrant  was 
graphically  described  by  a  villager: 

Maru  used  to  live  here.  He  was  ignorant  and  dirty.  He  wore  the  worst 
clothes  in  the  village.  He  always  had  manure  all  over  his  hair  and  clothes 
from  carrying  it  to  the  fields,  and  he  never  had  taken  a  bath.  Even  his  wife 
didn't  care  for  him,  and  she  took  up  with  his  cousin.  Because  of  that  he  ran 
off  to  Delhi,  and  no  one  heard  from  him  and  no  one  cared.  Then  he  came 
back  on  a  visit.  He  was  clean,  well-dressed,  and  handsome.  He  talked  just 
like  a  sahib.  He  had  a  job  at  Rs.  150  per  month  in  a  spinning  mill.  He  had 
had  one  hand  mangled  in  a  machine  and  got  Rs.  800  for  that.  He  brought 
a  radio  and  good  liquor  with  him.  The  radio  did  not  work,  but  everyone 
was  impressed.  He  still  works  there  and  is  doing  very  well.  It  was  all  in  his 
fate.  It  would  never  work  for  others  unless  that  was  in  their  fate,  too.  A  boy 
from  here  has  joined  him  recently.  He  may  fail,  but  perhaps  it  is  in  his  fate 
to  succeed,  too.  We  shall  see. 

There  was  considerable  interest  on  the  part  of  some  Rajputs  in  Sir- 
kanda in  getting  a  boy  into  "service,"  that  is,  into  a  white-collar  job. 


go6  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

So  far  there  had  been  no  success.  Two  Rajput  boys  had  recently  been 
sent  through  the  eighth  grade  with  this  end  in  view,  but  they  had 
failed.  The  father  of  one  complained: 

I  wish  one  of  the  boys  from  here  would  get  a  job  in  service.  We  sent  my 
eldest  son  and  his  cousin  out  to  school  so  that  they  could  succeed.  We  gave 
them  everything  they  needed  so  that  they  could  study  and  do  well.  When 
they  wanted  bicycles,  we  bought  them.  We  got  them  good  clothes.  But  all 
they  did  was  waste  their  time  going  to  the  cinema  and  the  like.  They  did 
not  apply  themselves,  so  they  both  failed  the  examinations  at  the  end  of  the 
eighth  grade.  Now  they  are  useless.  There  is  plenty  to  be  done  here  in  the 
village  and  a  good  income  can  be  made  from  it,  but  they  do  not  want  to  do 
village  work  any  more.  They  have  been  spoiled.  My  next  eldest  son,  whom 
I  did  not  educate,  is  content  to  work  in  the  village,  but  not  these  educated 
boys.  They  are  too  big  for  that.  They  carry  a  pen  and  pencil  in  their  pockets 
when  they  go  to  herd  goats.  They  go  off  to  town  when  they  get  a  chance 
and  waste  their  time  and  money.  My  boy  says  he  wants  a  job  there,  but  what 
can  he  do?  Nothing. 

I  know  that  young  men  have  new  ideas  now  and  I  try  not  to  stand  in  my 
boy's  way.  In  my  youth  we  wore  only  a  loincloth.  We  ran  around  bare- 
footed. Now  every  young  man  wants  an  outfit  of  22  clothes  and  goes  to 
fetch  water  in  boots  costing  Rs.  18.  One  has  to  move  with  the  times.  I  cater 
to  my  boy's  wants  within  reason.  Last  winter  I  bought  wool  for  coats  for  our 
family.  That  for  myself  cost  Rs.  8  per  yard,  that  for  my  father  cost  Rs.  12 
per  yard,  that  for  my  son  cost  Rs.  16  per  yard.  But  he  did  not  even  appre- 
ciate that.  This  fall  the  boy  sold  his  coat  to  the  schoolteacher  for  Rs.  10  so 
he  could  use  the  money  for  something  else.  He  claimed  the  coat  wasn't 
stylish.  Now  my  youngest  boy  is  in  school.  I  hope  he  will  do  better,  but  I 
fear  the  same  fate  for  him.  The  boys  go  wrong  because  they  are  not  super- 
vised in  town,  but  how  can  we  supervise  them  when  we  live  way  up  here? 

The  son  in  question  frequently  inquired  of  me  about  jobs  in  town, 
but  he  had  totally  unrealistic  goals  in  view  of  his  qualifications.  He 
spoke  of  wanting  to  be  an  office  worker  or  cinema  actor.  He  would 
consider  no  job  as  lowly  as  those  for  which  he  might  have  been 
qualified.  His  father  commented  that  "Even  if  he  made  Rs.  100  per 
month  it  would  not  meet  his  expenses  outside.  Here  in  a  good  season 
we  make  more  than  that  and  our  expenses  are  small."  This  boy's 
cousin  was  the  one  who  ran  off  to  join  the  millworker,  and  this  boy 
was  tempted  to  join  him,  but  ties  of  wife  and  joint  family  were  too 
strong  to  allow  him  to  do  it  secretly  and  he  was  not  granted  permission 
by  his  father  to  do  it.  His  affectations  were  the  bane  of  his  age-mates, 
who  had  the  maximum  village  education  (five  years)  or  less.  They,  by 
and  large,  were  content  to  remain  in  the  village  to  live  and  work  with 
occasional  visits  to  town  for  fun.  Their  requirements  for  clothes  and 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  307 

other  possessions  were  patterned  on  his,  but  their  concepts  of  what 
constituted  "fashion"  in  clothing  were  less  sophisticated  than  his. 

The  opinion  of  most  villagers  is  that  cultural  distances  are  too 
great  to  permit  their  successful  adjustment  to  town  life.  Despite  their 
efforts  to  practice  the  proverb,  "When  in  Nepal,  eat  buffalo"  (do  as  the 
Nepalese  do),  they  find  it  difficult  to  adjust  to  the  unfamiliar  way  of 
life  of  the  city.  One  young  man,  who  had  aspirations  toward  the  bright 
lights  of  the  city,  explained: 

People  in  this  village  are  mostly  content.  They  have  the  things  they  want, 
they  eat  enough,  and  many  of  them  are  well  off  by  local  standards.  Some- 
times they  like  to  go  to  Dehra  Dun.  They  put  on  their  best  clothes  and  feel 
proud  of  themselves.  But  when  they  get  to  town,  everyone  there  thinks  they 
are  fools.  We  don't  know  how  to  dress  or  act  in  town.  There  even  a  poor 
untouchable  puts  on  a  shirt  and  pajama  and  looks  respectable,  but  we  can't 
look  like  that.  Even  if  we  spend  Rs.  200  on  the  finest  cloth  and  have  the 
best  clothes  made,  we  still  look  like  fools  in  town. 

Many  stories  are   told  on   themselves   by  villagers,   illustrating  this 
point. 

Attractions  in  towns  which  draw  Paharis  are  cinemas,  "hotels" 
(shops  which  sell  sweets,  meals,  and  tea  to  the  accompaniment  of  loud 
radio  music),  drinking  establishments,  and  prostitutes.  Although  these 
are  rarely  the  sole  reason  for  going  to  town,  they  are  the  side  attractions 
of  trips  intended  primarily  for  trade  or  official  business  with  govern- 
ment offices.  A  Sirkanda  blacksmith  is  often  teased  about  his  affinity 
for  these  pleasures.  He  protests,  "It  is  true,  no  doubt,  but  why  must 
you  advertise  the  matter?  There  is  no  act  of  valor  in  it."  Two  examples 
of  his  experiences,  as  told  by  himself,  will  serve  to  illustrate  the  adven- 
tures of  Paharis  in  town.  The  first  of  these  concerns  his  first  visit  to  a 
prostitute  in  Dehra  Dun. 

I  had  a  little  money  and  nothing  to  do,  so  I  decided  to  go  to  a  prostitute. 
I  had  never  been  before  and  I  didn't  know  the  times  when  they  are  avail- 
able, but  I  knew  the  compound  where  their  houses  are.  About  12  at  night 
I  went  there  and  entered  the  gate  of  the  large  compound  containing  the 
houses  of  prostitutes.  Just  after  I  went  in  and  was  looking  around  to  decide 
my  next  move,  the  Muslim  gatekeeper  closed  and  locked  the  gate  I  had  just 
come  through.  I  was  frightened — I  wondered  how  I  could  ever  get  out  again. 
Then  I  saw  the  gatekeeper  hitting  people  who  tried  to  leave  [apparently 
people  who  wanted  to  sneak  out  without  paying].  I  wanted  to  get  away.  I 
walked  around  the  compound,  keeping  to  the  shadows,  but  saw  no  way  to 
escape.  Finally  I  climbed  a  stairway  to  one  of  the  balconies.  The  girl  there 
asked  me  what  I  would  pay.  I  had  Rs.  20,  so  I  gave  her  that  [actually  Rs.  2 
to  5  would  have  been  plenty].  She  took  me  into  her  room  and  brought  out 


go8  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

betel  nuts  and  a  cuspidor.  She  called  the  musicians  and  they  played  and  she 
sang  for  me.  I  sat  and  watched  and  listened.  I  never  knew  what  would 
happen  next,  but  I  didn't  want  to  go  out  and  be  beaten  by  the  gatekeeper. 
The  girl  asked  me  several  times  if  I  was  ready  but  I  always  said  no,  thinking 
that  would  cost  extra  and  I  had  no  more  money.  Finally,  much  later,  the 
girl  grew  disgusted  and  demanded,  "Why  have  you  come  here  and  paid  all 
this  money  and  not  wanted  intercourse?  What  do  you  want?"  Then  I  felt 
foolish  and  realized  that  this  was  included  in  the  price.  After  that  I  went 
back  many  times. 

Another  occasion  was  that  upon  which  this  man  decided  to  attend 
a  Western-type  restaurant  just  as  he  had  seen  the  important  towns- 
people do. 

I  went  to  the  Nilam  Bar  where  I  had  seen  the  big  people  go  in  their 
fancy  cars — the  same  people  who  drive  back  and  forth  past  the  prostitutes' 
compound  waiting  until  there  are  not  many  people  around,  and  then  send 
a  servant  in  to  make  sure  there  is  no  one  like  me  widi  their  favorite  girl, 
before  coming  in  themselves. 

I  bought  a  newspaper  to  take  in  with  me  so  that  they  might  not  know  I 
am  illiterate.  I  went  in  and  sat  down.  Soon  a  waiter  came,  all  dressed  in 
white,  and  handed  me  the  menu,  but  I  just  said  I  would  have  tea  and  cakes. 
The  waiter  asked  if  I  wanted  single  or  double.  I  thought  single  would  be  a 
cup  and  double  a  tumblerful,  so  I  ordered  a  double.  I  was  amazed  when  he 
brought  a  great  glass  pitcher  full  of  tea — enough  for  an  army.  The  sugar 
and  milk  were  in  separate  containers  rather  than  cooked  in  the  tea — a  sur- 
prise to  me.  However,  I  drank  some  tea  in  a  very  blase  manner  and  ate  some 
cakes.  I  left  some  of  each  uneaten  to  show  that  I  am  well-bred.  The  big 
people  never  eat  all  that  is  put  before  them  as  we  villagers  do.  If  I  had 
eaten  all  that  was  served  they  would  have  known  I  was  a  bumpkin.  After 
I  was  through  I  looked  at  my  paper  and  the  waiter  soon  brought  my  bill 
on  a  plate.  I  then  realized  that  I  did  not  know  the  cost  of  my  refreshment 
and  could  not  read  the  bill,  but  I  did  not  want  to  admit  this.  Therefore,  I 
got  up  absent-mindedly  and  walked  to  the  door.  There  I  asked  the  man  at 
the  desk  where  my  bill  was,  and  he  told  me  it  was  on  my  table.  I  said  I 
hadn't  noticed  it  and  now  didn't  have  time  to  go  back  to  get  it  as  my  car 
was  waiting  for  me  outside,  and  I  asked  him  to  tell  me  the  amount.  He  did 
— it  was  Rs.  6,  which  I  paid  him.  That  is  the  most  expensive  tea  I  ever  had 
[normally  tea  and  cakes  would  cost  not  over  R.  1  at  the  fanciest  of  eating 
places]. 

The  city  is  an  exciting,  but  in  many  ways  a  mysterious  and  dangerous, 
place  for  most  Paharis.  Even  the  cinemas  are  not  clearly  understood 
by  many  of  those  who  attend  them.  One  man,  having  recently  seen 
one,  was  asked  about  it.  Being  illiterate,  he  knew  neither  the  title 
nor  the  cast.  The  only  actor  he  recognized,  he  said,  was  Dr.  Rajendra 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  309 

Prasad  (President  of  India),  who  appeared  near  the  beginning  of  the 
film.  He  had  evidently  failed  to  differentiate  the  preceding  newsreel 
from  the  featured  film.  He  was  vague  about  the  plot  but  agreed 
vigorously  when  it  was  suggested  that  it  was  about  a  boy  and  girl  in 
love  who,  in  spite  of  great  obstacles,  finally  came  together  (the  plot  of 
go  per  cent  of  the  films  shown).  "Yes,  yes,  that  was  the  one  I  saw,"  he 
affirmed.  Occasionally  a  villager  happens  into  an  English-language 
cinema  but,  having  paid  his  admission,  usually  stoically  sits  it  out. 
He  is  often  rewarded,  according  to  those  who  have  seen  these  British 
and  American  films,  with  a  display  of  nudity  and  sexual  aberrations — 
the  local  interpretation  of  some  Western  women's  wear  and  love  scenes, 
respectively. 

An  important  feature  of  village-urban  contacts  is  that  of  victimiza- 
tion of  the  naive  Pahari  villager  by  urban  shopkeepers  and  others.  A 
foreigner  in  India  is  likely  to  get  the  impression  that  shopkeepers, 
service  personnel,  and  officials  are  "out  to  get"  him.  S.  J.  Perelman 
(1947,  p.  96)  has  summed  up  his  impression  of  India  in  the  phrase, 
"It's  not  the  heat,  it's  the  cupidity."  However,  this  is  not  exploitation 
of  the  foreigner  as  such;  it  is  exploitation  of  the  ignorant,  the  naive, 
the  unwary,  in  short,  the  vulnerable.  It  hits  the  villager,  and  partic- 
ularly the  Pahari  villager,  hard,  for  he  is  just  as  vulnerable  as  the 
foreigner  and  much  less  able  to  afford  the  results  of  his  vulnerability 
than  are  most  foreigners.  Such  exploitation  affects  villagers  in  most 
contacts  with  outsiders,  but  especially  in  the  urban  areas. 

The  average  villager  is  at  the  mercy  of  shopkeepers  when  he  goes 
to  town,  and  his  vulnerability  is  advertised  by  his  dress,  speech,  and 
manners.  He  is  an  easy  mark.  He  is  the  hillbilly  come  to  town,  and 
everyone  knows  he  has  money  with  him,  as  otherwise  he  would  not 
have  made  the  trip.  He  buys  inferior  goods  at  inflated  prices  and  is 
none  the  wiser.  He  pays  Rs.  2  for  a  flashlight  bulb  that  costs  anyone 
else  R.  0.25,  and  feels  fortunate  to  have  found  a  store  which  sells 
such  an  intricate  mechanism.  He  is  victim  of  the  cheat  and  thief 
and  the  dishonest  official  as  well.  The  only  Sirkanda  villager  who  ever 
tried  to  buy  a  radio  had  his  pocket  picked  of  the  Rs.  350  in  a  cinema 
before  he  had  had  a  chance  to  spend  it.  Money  is  extorted  from  Paharis 
regularly  by  corrupt  inspectors,  toll-tax  collectors,  and  police  who 
threaten  a  false  report  if  no  bribe  is  paid.  It  is  a  simple  matter  to 
produce  a  bottle  of  illicit  liquor  and  accuse  a  Pahari  of  having  sold 
it — better  to  pay  a  bribe  than  risk  a  heavy  fine  or  imprisonment.  The 
Wisers  have  described  well  the  position  of  residents  of  the  plains 
village  in  which  they  worked  for  several  years.  Paraphrasing  villagers' 
statements  they  say: 


o10  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

In  the  cities  they  devise  ways  of  exploiting  us.  .  .  .  We  are  at  home  in  the 
wholesale  market.  But  when  we  get  our  money  and  want  to  take  home  some 
cloth,  the  shopkeepers  get  out  the  pieces  which  they  have  been  unable  to 
dispose  of,  and  persuade  us  to  buy  them  at  exorbitant  prices.  We  know  that 
they  are  laughing  at  us.  But  we  want  cloth,  and  the  next  shopkeeper  will 
cheat  us  as  badly  as  the  last.  Wherever  we  go  in  the  town,  sharp  eyes  are 
watching  to  tempt  our  precious  rupees  from  us.  And  there  is  no  one  to  ad- 
vise us  honestly  or  to  help  us  escape  from  fraudulent  men.  When  we  go  to 
town  to  attend  the  courts,  there  are  men  everywhere  waiting  to  take  advan- 
tage of  our  ignorance  and  fear.  Our  lawyers  charge  fees  which  they  know 
are  beyond  our  means  to  pay.  And  then  if  we  win  a  case  they  think  that 
they  deserve  an  extra  large  gift.  Sometimes  there  is  a  sincere  helper  among 
them,  but  we  are  never  sure  who  is  what.  (C.  V.  and  W.  H.  Wiser,  1951,  p.  163) 

As  has  been  mentioned  previously,  social  pressure  is  one  factor 
which  keeps  people  from  bringing  urban  or  other  alien  traits  into 
the  village.  The  man  who  had  returned  to  the  village  after  being 
in  the  army  in  World  War  II,  and  who  had  enjoyed  his  outside  experi- 
ence very  much,  replied  to  an  inquiry: 

When  I  got  back  to  the  village  I  didn't  like  it  at  first.  I  was  used  to  the 
comforts  of  army  life.  But  I  gradually  became  accustomed  to  the  village 
again.  I  would  have  liked  to  bring  some  things  home  with  me,  especially 
utensils  and  other  conveniences  for  the  house.  However,  I  brought  only  some 
cloth  for  the  family,  and  what  I  brought  is  similar  to  what  other  people 
here  use.  I  didn't  bring  any  really  nice  clothes  or  other  things  because  peo- 
ple would  have  laughed  at  me. 

This  attitude  has  not  prevented  acquisition  of  material  possessions, 
but  it  has  been  one  reason  for  the  gradual  nature  of  adoption  of  new 
things.  Clothing  styles,  especially  those  of  men,  who  are  in  contact 
with  outsiders  more  frequently  than  are  women,  have  changed  con- 
siderably in  recent  years.  Costume  jewelry  and  other  ornaments  have 
been  acquired  by  women.  Household  possessions  have  come  to  in- 
clude more  utensils  procured  from  town  bazaars.  For  the  most  part 
these  have  been  relatively  minor  changes — better  artifacts  rather  than 
new  ones.  A  few  people  have  gotten  new  items,  spurred  by  urban 
example.  One  villager  had  a  functioning  phonograph  and  a  few  worn 
records,  and  someone  else  was  alleged  to  have  a  similar  machine,  long 
inoperative.  The  only  radio  in  Bhatbair  history,  brought  by  the  man 
employed  near  Delhi,  had  failed  to  operate.  When  I  left,  mine  was  in 
great  demand  but  the  likelihood  is  that  it  was  used  only  until  its 
battery  was  exhausted.  A  few  young  men  in  the  village  had  mechanical 
pencils  or  pens,  and  at  least  one  owned  a  cheap  watch.  One  purchased 
a  Japanese  cigarette  lighter  adorned  with  photographs  of  nude  girls. 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  3  1  1 

Many  boys  owned  pocket  knives.  The  village  tailor  had  a  hand- 
operated  sewing  machine  and  a  charcoal-heated  iron  for  use  in  his 
craft. 

Tools  and  materials  for  agriculture  have  changed  little.  Corrugated 
iron  is  now  often  used  in  roofing,  and  one  new  house  has  a  little 
cement  in  its  construction.  Household  furnishings  now  include  string 
cots  and  cotton  quilts  or  rugs  in  addition  to  the  traditional  wool 
blanket  used  for  sleeping  on  the  floor.  A  few  kerosene  storm  lanterns 
and  one  or  two  flashlights  are  in  the  village. 

There  is  an  accelerating  demand  for  all  these  things  as  they  become 
increasingly  accessible  and  as  villagers  become  increasingly  aware  of 
them.  However,  material  items  in  the  village,  like  behavior  and  beliefs, 
are  predominantly  traditional. 

The  Government  in  Sirkanda 

Sirkanda  is  strategically  located  in  many  respects.  It  is  the  gateway 
from  the  valley  to  much  of  Bhatbair  and  neighboring  areas  to  the  east. 
It  is  the  most  accessible  of  the  large  villages  of  the  interior  of  this 
area.  As  such  it  has  been  the  focus  of  recent  attention  by  agencies  of 
the  state  and  national  governments.  It  has  been  designated  as  the  seat 
of  the  council,  originally  for  much  of  Bhatbair  and  now  for  a  less 
populous  area  on  the  western  edge  of  Bhatbair.  It  is  the  village  which 
serves  as  headquarters  for  the  village  level  worker  and  the  economic 
cooperative  supervisor.  It  contains  the  largest  of  three  schools  in  Bhat- 
bair. On  the  rare  occasions  when  tax  collectors  or  other  officials  come 
to  Bhatbair,  they  usually  do  their  work  in  Sirkanda. 

In  order  to  understand  the  relationship  of  villagers  to  specific  pro- 
grams in  the  village,  it  is  necessary  first  to  understand  attitudes  toward 
the  government  in  general. 

The  first  question  asked  of  the  anthropologist  in  Bhatbair  villages 
and  in  all  other  hill  areas  visited  was  invariably,  "How  can  we  get 
our  forests  back?"  In  Bhatbair  the  remark  which  was  usually  associated 
with  this  question  was,  "When  are  the  British  coming  back  into 
power?"  These  two  questions  sum  up  village  attitudes  toward  the 
present  government.  It  is  felt  by  villagers  that  the  British  government 
had  two  outstanding  qualities:  (i)  it  did  not  meddle  in  village  affairs, 
(2)  it  was  an  ultimately  available  source  of  impartial,  if  not  always 
comprehensible,  justice.  Thus,  it  is  believed,  it  was  the  antithesis  of 
the  present  government.  To  the  further  credit  of  the  British  was  the 
fact  that  they  established  the  bhaichara  system  of  land  ownership  in 
Sirkanda,  giving  every  high-caste  family  the  land  it  cultivated,  elim- 


312  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

inating  the  intermediate  landlord  of  earlier  times,  and  charging 
relatively  low  taxes. 

The  current  state  and  national  governments  (not  distinguished 
from  one  another  by  villagers)  are  thought  by  Sirkanda  people  to  be 
made  up  of  corrupt  troublemakers.  Anything  advocated  by  the  gov- 
ernment or  its  representatives  is  automatically  suspect  and  is  usually 
opposed  out  of  hand.  Villagers'  attitudes  were  perfectly  exemplified 
in  their  response  to  Republic  Day  ceremonies  planned  for  the  village 
by  the  teacher,  and  supported  by  the  other  two  governmental  em- 
ployees stationed  in  Sirkanda.  This  celebration  was  announced  well 
in  advance.  A  full  day  of  activities  was  scheduled,  beginning  with 
a  flag-raising  ceremony  at  the  school,  followed  by  a  procession  of 
school  children,  led  through  the  village  by  the  teacher  and  his  fellow 
sponsors,  singing  patriotic  and  religious  songs.  In  the  afternoon  a 
village  assembly  meeting  was  to  be  held  at  which  patriotic  speeches 
would  be  made  and  some  village  business  would  be  conducted.  At 
the  conclusion  of  this,  tea  and  sweets  were  to  be  distributed. 

Villagers  completely  ignored  the  whole  program.  When  the  singing 
group  went  through  the  village  not  a  soul  joined,  acknowledged,  or 
even  watched,  the  procession.  Even  the  usual  number  of  people  who 
would  be  expected  to  be  in  view  were  out  of  sight,  consciously  avoid- 
ing the  display.  No  one  came  to  the  scheduled  meeting,  and  only  the 
school  children  were  on  hand  to  receive  sweets.  This  was  enough  to 
discourage  even  the  conscientious  teacher  and  to  convince  the  other 
workers  that  their  job  in  Sirkanda  was  hopeless. 

Land  Reform 

One  of  the  first  acts  by  the  Independent  government  of  India 
to  affect  Sirkanda  was  the  nationalization  of  forest  lands  in  1953. 
This  affected  all  uncultivated  and  unoccupied  lands  surrounding  the 
village.  In  so  doing,  the  government  placed  restrictions  upon  cultiva- 
tion of  new  lands  and  upon  access  to  the  products  of  uncultivated 
lands,  apparently  with  a  view  to  reducing  floods,  erosion,  and  depletion 
of  forest  resources.  By  this  act  alone,  most  hill  people  were  alienated 
from  the  government  because  it  hit  at  the  basis  of  Pahari  livelihood. 
Paharis  live  in  their  none-too-hospitable  environment  largely  by  full 
utilization  of  forest  products.  Forest  grass  and  leaves  are  fodder  for 
their  animals,  and  forest  trees  are  made  into  their  tools,  many  of 
their  utensils,  and  essential  parts  of  their  houses.  Most  importantly, 
the  forest  provides  wood  for  fuel.  Without  such  fuel  the  villagers 
would  have  to  resort  to  the  plains  practice  of  burning  dung,  and  they 
would  then  be  unable  to  fertilize  their  fields.  Without  fertilizer  their 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  3 13 

fields  would  be  unlikely  to  produce  a  subsistence  crop.  Moreover,  as 
is  readily  evident  to  any  observer,  such  utilization  of  the  forests  does 
not  seriously  affect  the  forests.  Where  devastating  depletion  has  oc- 
curred and  is  still  occurring  rapidly  and  irreparably,  is  where  outside 
contractors  have  been  given  the  right  to  cut  trees  in  order  to  make 
and  sell  charcoal.  In  this  manner  whole  forests  go  down  that  have 
been  unaffected  by  hundreds  of  years  of  village  use.  Villagers  would 
gladly  see  curbs  put  on  this  practice,  which  benefits  them  not  in  the 
least  and  depletes  their  own  forest  resources. 

The  government  has  not  forbidden  use  of  forest  lands  and  products 
(especially  trees)  to  villagers,  but  it  has  placed  tighter  restrictions  upon 
such  use  than  existed  heretofore.  The  villagers,  however,  feel  that  the 
forest  is  their  own  land,  and  they  refuse  to  make  even  a  pretense  at 
asking  permission  to  use  that  which  they  believe  to  be  rightly  theirs. 
Anyway,  the  appropriate  governmental  representatives  from  whom 
permission  can  be  obtained,  the  forestry  officer  and  the  land  records 
officer,  are  not  easily  accessible  and  not  always  sympathetic,  and  the 
necessary  procedures  are  ponderously  time-consuming  and  complex, 
so  that  any  desire  to  obey  the  law  is  discouraged  at  the  outset.  Local 
caste  and  factional  alignments  are  an  obstacle  because  applications  for 
forest  products  have  to  be  made  through  the  local  council.  Therefore, 
disobedience  of  public  laws  is  accepted  practice  in  this  sphere,  a  fact 
which  may  have  facilitated  its  spread  to  other  spheres. 

The  seriousness  of  public  reaction  to  these  regulations  may  be  in- 
ferred from  the  headline  of  a  story  in  a  newspaper  of  Dehra  Dun 
and  Mussoorie  in  August,  1958:  "congress  men  threaten  direct 
action,  Forest  Rights  Issue  Causes  Unrest"  (Himachal  Times,  1958b). 
The  local  political  figures'  threat  came  five  years  after  the  issue  arose 
and  followed  a  state  government  decision,  based  on  a  subcommittee's 
report,  not  to  make  any  concessions  on  the  matter.  This  issue  has 
been  a  major  factor  in  support  of  demands,  farther  to  the  west,  for  a 
separate  hill  state  for  the  "suppressed  and  exploited"  hill  people 
(Himachal  Times,  1958a). 

Defiance  of  these  rules  (as  of  the  government  in  general)  takes  many 
forms  in  the  village.  It  is  against  the  law  to  burn  grass  in  the  forest. 
Throughout  the  lower  Himalayas  from  time  immemorial,  the  forest 
grass  has  been  burned  every  dry  season  just  before  the  rains  to  make 
a  better  crop  of  new  grass  after  the  rains.  In  this  process  fires  occasion- 
ally get  out  of  hand.  Occasionally  a  chan  and  the  animals  in  it  are 
consumed  in  flames.  However,  villagers  consider  this  a  calculated  and 
not  unduly  heavy  risk,  inherent  in  the  performance  of  a  necessary 
task.  The  government,  apparently  worried  about  forest  trees  (which 


314  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

villagers  insist  are  unaffected  by  the  fires),  has  outlawed  the  practice 
with  notably  unimpressive  results.  In  June  the  lower  Himalayan  grass- 
lands are  still  blackened  and  a  thick  pall  of  smoke  obscures  the 
Himalayan  view.  The  difference  is  that  now  the  practice  has  become 
a  contest  to  outwit  and  frustrate  the  forest  guard — a  contest  which 
villagers  invariably  win.  In  1958,  when  the  forest  guard  came  to  fight 
some  fires  around  Sirkanda,  he  was  greeted  with  complete  apathy.  He 
asked  for  volunteers  to  help  fight  the  fires  and  got  no  one  to  help. 
He  was  told,  "You  get  paid  Rs.  60  per  month  to  fight  fires.  Why  should 
we  who  earn  nothing  help  you?  Pay  us  Rs.  60  per  month  and  we  will 
gladly  join  you.  Otherwise,  leave  us  alone." 

Wherever  the  forest  guard  went,  new  fires  would  appear  over  the 
ridge  or  just  out  of  sight,  usually  with  a  few  idly  watching  "observers" 
to  keep  the  flames  away  from  valuable  property  such  as  chans  or  caches 
of  firewood.  This  occurred  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  the  forest  guard 
was  relatively  well  liked  as  an  individual  and  had  the  villagers'  welfare 
in  mind.  He  felt  compelled  to  report  one  particularly  large  and  visible 
fire  in  1957,  and  asked  villagers  to  make  statements  as  to  its  origin. 
All  he  wanted  them  to  say  was  that  it  began  by  a  public  trail,  probably 
from  the  cigarette  of  an  unknown  traveler.  This  report  would  have 
been  satisfactory  to  the  authorities  and  would  have  precluded  further 
investigation.  Instead,  villagers  responded  with  statements  to  the  effect, 
"It  is  our  forest,  and  we  will  burn  it  or  not  as  we  please."  This  would 
have  brought  further  investigation  and  a  fine  to  the  village  had  it 
gone  in  the  official  report.  Only  by  privately  working  out  the  report 
with  the  village  council  president  was  a  sufficiently  innocuous  state- 
ment obtained  and  submitted  to  avoid  further  complications.  Such 
cases  of  defiance  of  forest  laws  are  commonplace  in  Sirkanda  and 
throughout  the  hills.  Recently  there  has  been  talk  of  assigning  a  forest 
guard  to  Sirkanda,  making  it  the  center  of  a  new  forest  district.  This 
plan  is  bitterly  opposed  by  villagers.  At  present  Sirkanda  is  at  the 
junction  of  three  large  forest  districts  under  the  jurisdiction  of  three 
distant  forest  guards,  a  situation  which  facilitates  evasion  of  the  forest 
laws.  The  boundaries  actually  meet  in  the  settlement  area  of  the  vil- 
lage, and  the  responsible  officers  are  stationed  in  three  widely  separated 
centers. 

As  has  been  stated  earlier  (chap.  2),  nationalization  of  the  forest 
lands  has  made  it  illegal  to  cultivate  new  lands  without  special  per- 
mission. Villagers  cite  nationalization  as  an  example  of  governmental 
stupidity.  "The  government  asked  us  to  increase  crop  production  for 
the  national  welfare.  We  were  happy  to  comply.  However,  at  the  same 
time  they  made  illegal  the  only  means  to  accomplish  this."  The  ruling 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  315 

means  that,  as  fields  become  depleted  or  inadequate  for  increasing 
family  size,  new  ones  cannot  be  legally  prepared  without  special  per- 
mission. An  understanding  village  accountant  (probably  he  understood 
bribes)  looked  the  other  way  when  villagers  disobeyed  the  law,  but  a 
later  accountant,  either  out  of  respect  for  the  law  or  pique  at  the  lack 
of  bribes  or  of  sufficient  bribes,  reported  the  matter.  Considerable 
rancor  was  aroused  before  a  reasonably  happy  solution  was  reached 
in  the  land  records  office,  where  the  offenders  were  assessed  back  taxes 
and  allowed  to  keep  the  land.  This  is  not  a  solution  for  the  future, 
however.  As  in  the  use  of  forest  products,  notably  trees,  there  is  not 
a  rigid  prohibition  against  use  of  new  land,  but  there  is  a  procedure 
of  application,  payment  of  fees,  and  so  on,  which  must  be  followed. 
Villagers  refuse  to  abide  by  these  rules  just  as  they  do  the  forest  laws. 
Their  attitude  is  not  softened  by  the  extreme  difficulty  they  encounter, 
the  necessity  for  repeated  trips  to  distant  headquarters,  the  arrogant 
and  often  greedy  officials  with  whom  they  must  deal  in  making  such 
applications.  It  is  a  task  to  frustrate  anyone,  most  of  all  a  semiliterate 
villager.  This  point  will  be  elaborated  below  as  one  element  in  a 
pattern  which  villagers  face  in  dealing  with  the  government. 

Another  aspect  of  land  legislation  is  that  of  taxation.  Unfortunately, 
when  landlordism  was  abolished  in  the  state  in  1953,  taxes  were  raised 
slightly  for  Sirkanda  landowners.  Although  the  increase  was  slight 
and  lower  taxes  resulted  for  the  majority  of  agriculturists  in  the 
state,  it  was  resented  in  Sirkanda,  where  all  agriculturists  had  long 
owned  the  land  they  tilled.  The  village  comment  is,  "Congress  prom- 
ised to  lower  taxes  and  instead  they  raised  them."  Villagers  are 
totally  unaware  of  the  larger  picture  on  this  matter. 

The  indiscriminate  application  of  general  programs  of  land  reform 
that  are  inappropriate  to  the  Pahari  context  has  thus  been  an  im- 
portant factor  in  alienating  these  villagers  from  the  government.  In 
itself  it  would  probably  have  been  sufficient  to  achieve  this  result. 
However,  it  was  not  the  only  factor. 

Agents  of  Authority 

For  villagers,  one  of  the  most  frustrating  aspects  of  their  relation- 
ship to  the  government  is  their  contact  with  its  official  representatives, 
and  especially  those  who  hold  power  over  them.  The  Wisers  have 
discussed  the  problem  in  a  plains  village  at  some  length  (C.  V.  and 
W.  H.  Wiser,  1951,  pp.  130  ff.;  cf.  Beals,  1954,  Newell,  1954).  The 
brutality  and  dishonesty  of  the  police  are  proverbial  in  Sirkanda.  The 
maxim,  "Never  trust  a  policeman,"  is  often  quoted  and  religiously  prac- 
ticed. Specific  instances  of  police  brutality  and  dishonesty  are  legion, 


gi6  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

ranging  from  simple  demands  for  bribes  upon  threat  of  a  false  accu- 
sation of  illegal  distilling  to  unreasonable  violence  in  trying  to  extract 
confessions  or  information  (or,  alternatively,  heavy  bribes)  from  people 
who  obviously  had  no  connection  with  a  case. 

Similarly,  the  corruption  of  village  accountants  is  proverbial.  These 
officials  today  are  people  totally  unassociated  with  the  village  or  even 
the  area.  The  accountant  for  most  of  Bhatbair  in  1957-1958  had  not 
been  seen  by  villagers  since  his  appointment  two  years  previously, 
until  suddenly  word  came  to  him  that  a  higher  official  would  be  coming 
on  an  inspection  tour.  The  accountant  appeared  in  great  haste  to 
prepare  records  in  two  weeks  that  should  have  been  kept  over  the  past 
two  years.  In  the  process  his  arrogance,  incompetence,  and  inaccuracy, 
combined  with  his  corruption,  put  the  villagers  at  a  disadvantage  and 
aroused  their  resentment. 

Such  examples  are  not  unique  to  the  post-Independence  era.  They 
carry  on  a  long-established  tradition.  As  many  examples  could  be  cited 
under  British  rule. 

The  point,  as  the  villagers  see  it,  is  that,  compared  to  British  times, 
(1)  there  are  now  more  occasions  upon  which  a  person  is  likely  to 
confront  officials,  and  (2)  there  is  now  no  ultimate  authority  from 
which  justice  can  be  obtained,  and  therefore  officials  are  arrogant 
to  an  extreme  never  before  seen.  Whether  or  not  the  comparison  is 
accurate,  it  is  believed  by  villagers. 

To  take  these  points  in  order,  it  is  readily  apparent  that  the  amount 
of  official  activity  and  consequently  the  number  of  agents  of  authority 
affecting  villagers  has  increased  greatly  since  Independence  with  the 
institution  of  land  reforms,  community  development  plans,  and  other 
programs.  The  activities  of  rationing  authorities  may  be  considered 
as  an  example.  Villagers  often  use  corrugated  iron  for  roofing.  To  get 
it  they  must  apply  through  a  rationing  office  whose  officials,  being  in 
league  with  black  marketeers,  never  authorize  enough  of  the  material 
to  fulfill  the  villagers'  needs.  The  official  procedures  are  such  that  to 
obtain  any  legal  materials  at  all  requires  several  trips  to  town.  Most 
villagers  would  agree  with  one  who  said: 

By  the  time  you  have  gone  to  Dehra  Dun  two  or  three  times  [a  two-day 
undertaking  necessitating  an  overnight  stay  in  strange  surroundings]  and 
have  been  insulted  by  the  officials  and  then  get  only  one-fourth  of  the  roofing 
you  need,  you  learn  that  it  is  better  to  go  directly  to  the  black  market  and 
get  what  you  need  at  the  higher  price.  That  is  where  you  will  have  to  go  in 
the  end  anyway. 

This  is  just  one  of  several  newly  created  official  hazards  for  villagers. 
The  biggest  complaint  of  villagers  against  the  present  government 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  3  T7 

is  the  lack  of  ultimate,  impartial  justice.  As  they  frequently  point  out, 
under  the  British  the  police  were  corrupt  and  the  accountants  were 
corrupt,  but  the  courts  were  fair.  Examples  are  told  of  corrupt  officials 
of  all  types  who  were  found  guilty  in  the  courts  under  the  British, 
and  of  false  court  cases  exposed  by  the  district  magistrate.  Officials 
were  restrained  by  the  knowledge  that  this  authority  existed.  Tax 
collectors  were  often  polite.  Milk  inspectors  were  often  honest  or  at 
least  refrained  from  pressing  their  authority  too  far.  Villagers  contrast 
that  idealized  (and  perhaps  unrealistic)  picture  with  the  realities  of  the 
present.  An  example  of  immediate  importance  and  tangible  effect 
was  recounted  by  villagers  as  follows: 

It  has  long  been  our  custom  to  sell  milk  in  the  markets  of  Dehra  Dun  and 
Mussoorie.  The  government  sometimes  inspects  this  milk  now,  as  it  did 
under  the  British.  Under  the  British,  if  we  adulterated  the  milk  with  water 
and  were  caught,  as  sometimes  happened,  we  were  fined  and  were  denied 
permission  to  sell  for  a  specified  period  thereafter.  This  we  knew  and  could 
count  upon.  Now  when  we  carry  our  milk  to  market  we  may  be  stopped  by 
the  inspectors  who,  without  even  looking  at  our  milk,  accuse  us  of  adulter- 
ating it.  We  must  pay  them  a  bribe  or  go  to  court  and  be  fined  and  penalized, 
for  what  is  the  word  of  a  milkman  against  that  of  an  inspector.  For  this 
reason  most  of  us  have  quit  selling  milk  since  Independence.  We  now  sell 
instead  a  solidified  milk  product  which  is  less  profitable  but  which  cannot 
be  easily  adulterated  and  which  is  therefore  not  inspected. 

The  courts  are  held  in  utter  contempt  by  most  villagers.  Examples 
are  given  from  this  area  of  how  even  the  most  serious  and  flagrant 
crimes  or  civil  cases  are  decided  on  the  basis  of  bribery.  "No  crime  is 
now  so  serious  that  money  cannot  win  acquittal;  no  man  is  so  innocent 
that  an  enemy  cannot  put  him  in  prison  or  win  a  judgment  against 
him  if  he  has  sufficient  money  for  bribes."  "Under  the  British  there 
was  justice — water  for  water  and  milk  for  milk.  Now  water  and  milk 
are  one"  (that  is,  lies  were  then  treated  as  lies,  truth  as  truth;  now 
they  are  not  distinguished).  It  is  felt  that  now  even  the  highest  official 
is  subject  to  bribes  and  that  a  poor  villager  has  no  one  to  whom  to  turn. 

Comments  from  a  range  of  informants  of  all  castes  indicate  con- 
sistent attitudes  toward  the  government: 

Before  Independence  India  was  ruled  by  the  British;  now  it  is  ruled  by 
rascals.  Law  was  then  just,  now  anyone  with  money  can  avoid  the  law. 

Under  the  British  there  was  government  by  men;  now  it  is  government 
by  money. 

In  days  of  British  rule  India  was  a  subject  nation,  but  at  least  there  was  an 
established  law  and  order.  Now  India  is  like  a  woman  with  several  husbands, 
dominated  by  whichever  is  present  at  the  moment. 


9X8  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

Under  the  British  we  were  free — we  cultivated  and  worked  as  we  pleased. 
Now  we  are  slaves.  The  government  tells  us  what  to  do  and  what  not  to  do. 

The  Congress  promised  to  circulate  gold  money  when  freedom  was  won. 
Instead  they  are  circulating  money  of  alloy  that  is  not  even  pure  silver  or 
copper.  So  it  is  with  their  promises. 

The  people,  especially  the  leaders,  wanted  to  get  rid  of  the  British.  But 
in  fact,  India  under  British  rule  was  better  than  it  has  been  since  Inde- 
pendence under  the  Congress  government. 

This  government  will  be  able  to  stay  in  power  by  force  but  not  by  the 
people's  will. 

In  this  context  of  grass-roots  rejection  the  government  has  attempted 
to  carry  out  various  specific  programs  in  Bhatbair. 

Community  Development 

On  October  2,  1952,  the  anniversary  of  Mahatma  Gandhi's  birthday, 
India  launched  a  program  whose  purpose  was  no  less  than  a  rural  revolu- 
tion. What  it  proposed  was  to  transform  the  social  and  economic  life  and 
outlook  of  the  rural  people,  raise  farm  production  and  incomes,  and  create 
from  stagnant  backward  villages  a  vital,  progressive  rural  community.  It 
proposed  to  do  all  this,  not  by  coercion,  but,  as  the  "essence  of  the  program," 
by  self-help  and  participation  of  the  people  themselves.  (Planning  Commis- 
sion, 1958,  p.  168) 

This  was  the  Community  Development  Program.  Its  aim  was  to  enable 
people  to  raise  their  standard  of  living  by  introducing  schools,  com- 
munity centers,  pure  water,  better  seeds,  tools,  and  techniques  of 
acquiring  a  livelihood,  better  transportation,  and  better  public  health. 
The  key  person  in  this  program  is  the  village  level  worker  (VLW) 
or  Gram  Sevak  (village  servant). 

Living  in  one  of  a  "circle"  of  the  eight  to  ten  villages  under  his  care,  the 
worker  goes  from  village  to  village,  from  farmer  to  farmer,  using  all  the 
techniques  familiar  to  extension  work  in  the  west — field  demonstrations, 
individual  talks  and  group  discussions,  audio-visual  teaching,  approach  to 
villagers  with  help  on  felt  needs  in  order  to  awaken  new  needs  and  interest 
in  change. 

Trained  as  a  multi-purpose  worker,  he  brings  help  and  information  on 
improved  methods  of  cultivation,  on  health  care  and  sanitation,  on  cattle 
diseases  and  their  prevention,  and  so  on.  Working  through  village  leaders, 
he  enlists  the  interest  and  participation  of  the  village  as  a  whole  in  change 
and  progress.  (Planning  Commission,  1958,  p.  171) 

In  January,  1955,  a  Community  Development  Block  was  opened  in 
Eastern  Dehra  Dun  District  which  brought  a  total  of  88  village  ad- 
ministrative units  (and  a  population  of  62,000  people),  including  those 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  319 

of  Bhatbair,  into  the  Community  Development  program.  Shortly  there- 
after a  VLW  was  stationed  in  Nagal,  a  large  village  in  the  valley  seven 
miles  from  Sirkanda.  His  area  of  responsibility  was  large,  including 
Bhatbair  and  a  number  of  villages  in  the  valley.  In  1957  this  Develop- 
ment Block  was  changed  from  a  National  Extension  Block  to  an  In- 
tensive Development  Block,  the  shift  being  intended  to  increase  de- 
velopment activity.  At  this  time  additional  VLW's  were  assigned.  In 
addition  to  the  one  at  Nagal,  who  continued  to  have  responsibility 
for  a  number  of  valley  villages  and  a  few  on  the  edge  of  Bhatbair,  a 
new  VLW  was  assigned  with  Sirkanda  as  his  headquarters  and  the 
interior  of  Bhatbair  as  his  area  of  responsibility.  This  man  was  in 
Sirkanda  a  year,  from  the  summer  of  1957  until  the  summer  of  1958. 
Therefore,  virtually  all  his  official  activities  were  observed  by  the 
anthropologist.  This  period  overlapped  the  third  and  fourth  year  of 
the  program  in  the  area,  the  second  year  of  India's  second  five-year  plan. 

Specific  goals  for  Sirkanda  in  the  second  five-year  plan  were  the 
construction  of  a  community  center  and  repair  of  thirty  miles  of  trails. 
Other  projects  attempted  were  those  mentioned  in  the  council  meeting 
described  above  (chap.  8).  In  addition  the  VLW  had  a  box  of  equip- 
ment for  first  aid  and  equipment  for  inoculating  and  castrating 
animals,  and  he  was  supposed  to  encourage  the  villagers  in  self-gov- 
ernment, patriotic  fervor,  equalitarianism,  and  other  aspects  of  the  new 
national  creed. 

At  the  end  of  his  year  in  Sirkanda,  when  he  finally  achieved  his  goal 
of  securing  a  transfer,  the  VLW  had  achieved  no  tangible  results  in 
any  of  his  areas  of  responsibility  in  Bhatbair.  He  had,  however,  turned 
in  satisfactory  reports.  The  proceedings  of  the  only  council  meeting 
held  during  that  year  are  indicative  of  the  programs  undertaken  and 
the  way  villagers  reacted  to  them.  It  is  relevant  here  to  summarize 
briefly  the  results  of  the  items  taken  up  and  decided  upon  in  that 
meeting:  No  one  ever  came  to  inspect  the  problem  of  the  village's 
water  supply,  and  nothing  was  done  about  it.  The  panchayat  tax  was 
not  collected.  No  voluntary  labor  was  performed  on  trails  or  on  any 
other  project  discussed  in  the  meeting;  the  agreed-upon  days  for  this 
came  and  went  without  comment  from  the  VLW  or  villagers.  No 
attempt  was  made  to  set  up  a  night  school  (but  this,  unlike  the  other 
items,  had  been  formally  rejected  in  council  meeting).  No  agricultural 
training  session  was  held,  although  the  VLW  had  been  specifically 
directed  to  hold  a  session  in  which  he  would  explain  to  villagers  the 
Japanese  method  of  rice  cultivation.  Despite  considerable  talk  about 
the  matter  on  his  part,  no  such  session  was  ever  held.  The  Village 
Credit  Cooperative  Society  of  Sirkanda  got  no  paid-up  members  as  a 


320  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

result  of  the  efforts  of  the  VLW,  the  council,  or  the  society  itself,  al- 
though later  (as  will  be  explained  below)  some  token  success  was 
achieved  on  this  score.  No  further  action  or  discussion  about  a  com- 
munity center  took  place.  School  attendance  did  rise,  but  because  of 
independent  efforts  of  the  teacher  rather  than  council  action.  No 
National  Savings  Certificates  were  sold.  In  addition,  in  the  entire  year 
the  interior  of  the  VLW's  first-aid  kit  and  the  veterinary  equipment 
were  never  exposed  to  the  light  of  day.  In  short,  the  VLW  was  totally 
ineffective  in  this  village  and  throughout  his  area  of  responsibility. 
As  will  be  explained  in  the  discussion  below,  this  was  a  result  of 
several  factors,  including  the  training,  motivation,  and  personal  char- 
acteristics of  this  VLW;  villagers'  attitudes  toward  the  government, 
toward  change,  and  toward  community  cooperation;  and  inappro- 
priateness  of  the  program  and  of  its  manner  of  presentation  in  the 
village. 

Credit  Cooperative  Program 

A  second  civil  servant  assigned  to  the  village  for  approximately 
the  same  period  as  the  VLW  was  the  economic  cooperative  supervisor, 
locally  known  as  the  "supervisor  sahib,"  and  here  termed  ECS.  His 
job  was  to  set  up  government-sponsored  credit  cooperatives  in  the 
various  villages  of  Bhatbair  on  the  strength  of  a  report  submitted  by 
another  officer  who  had  previously  visited  the  area  and  had  secured 
signatures  in  several  of  these  villages  indicating  interest  in  the  plan. 
The  idea  was  that  villagers  were  to  buy  shares  at  Rs.  20  (payable  over 
two  and  one-half  years),  each  of  which  would  entitle  the  holder  to 
borrow  Rs.  100  at  8.5  per  cent  annual  interest.  This  plan  met  with  no 
success  in  any  village  in  the  area.  In  the  words  of  the  ECS: 

All  of  these  villages  signed  up  with  the  agent  saying  that  they  wanted 
cooperatives,  but  they  probably  did  it  just  to  get  rid  of  him.  There  is  no 
real  interest,  and  none  of  the  people  who  signed  up  have  received  me 
cordially.  In  no  village  has  anyone  paid  any  dues,  and  there  is  no  prospect 
of  setting  up  cooperatives  here. 

In  the  council  meeting  at  Sirkanda  the  necessary  minimum  of  five 
pledges  was  recorded,  including  the  most  unlikely  member  of  all,  a 
landless  blacksmith.  A  month  later  the  ECS  was  notified  that  he  was 
to  lose  his  job  for  not  producing  results.  Upon  receipt  of  this  intel- 
ligence, the  teacher  and  he  managed  to  round  up  nine  people  who 
made  payments  of  Rs.  2  to  10  each  as  initial  membership  fees  in 
response  to  a  plea  to  save  the  job  of  the  ECS.  No  mention  of  the 
advantages  of  the  society  was  made  in  this  hurried  fund  drive.  The 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  321 

council  president,  who  had  been  a  steadfast  foe  of  the  plan,  later 
commented,  "We  started  a  cooperative  society  so  the  ECS  wouldn't 
lose  his  job."  The  factors  relevant  to  the  ineffectiveness  of  the  ECS 
are  precisely  parallel  to  those  relevant  to  the  case  of  the  VLW. 

Failure  of  the  Programs 

In  analyzing  the  lack  of  success  of  these  two  men  and  the  pro- 
grams they  were  employed  to  advocate,  it  is  obvious  that  social  and 
cultural  factors — the  relationship  of  the  social  organization  and  cul- 
ture of  the  villagers  to  the  programs  presented — were  crucial.  It  is 
important,  therefore,  to  consider  both  social  and  cultural  factors  and 
the  content  of  the  programs  presented.  Also  significant  in  the  degree 
of  success  or  failure  of  the  programs  was  the  manner  in  which  they 
were  presented  and  the  personnel  who  presented  them.  These  factors 
will  be  discussed  in  that  order. 

SOCIAL  AND  CULTURAL  FACTORS 

Dube  (1956,  1958)  has  discussed  at  some  length  social  and  cultural 
factors  in  relation  to  change  in  Indian  villages: 

Agents  of  rural  development  projects  and  of  programs  of  technical  as- 
sistance are  confronted  with  these  factors  at  almost  every  step  of  their  work. 
The  acceptance  of  the  agents  of  change  as  well  as  the  effectiveness  of  the 
media  through  which  they  endeavor  to  communicate  their  innovations  are 
largely  governed  by  the  cultural  predispositions,  attitudes,  and  social  organi- 
zation of  the  community  in  which  they  operate.  The  acceptance  of  the  pro- 
gram itself,  or  of  its  constituent  parts,  is  determined  to  a  considerable  extent 
by  a  variety  of  complex  cultural  factors,  ranging  from  simple  habits  and 
accepted  social  practices  to  the  intricate  patterns  of  belief,  social  structure, 
world  view,  and  values  and  attitudes.  (Dube,  1956,  pp.  19  f.) 

Attitudes  of  suspicion  and  avoidance  of  outsiders  seem  to  be  char- 
acteristic of  the  relatively  closed  society  of  Sirkanda,  where  familiar 
ties  of  kinship,  caste,  and  community  are  necessary  if  an  individual 
is  to  be  accepted  into  the  group  or  even  to  be  dealt  with  on  equal 
terms.  Lacking  these,  an  outsider  is  an  unknown  and  potentially  dan- 
gerous quantity  best  avoided. 

The  Wisers  have  paraphrased  the  attitude  of  plains  villagers  toward 
change  as  follows: 

To  a  new-comer  we  may  seem  suspicious,  obstinate,  intolerant,  backward 
— all  that  goes  with  refusal  to  change.  We  did  not  choose  qualities  for  our- 
selves. Experience  forced  them  upon  our  fathers.  .  .  .  Refusal  to  change  is 
the  armour  with  which  we  have  learned  to  protect  ourselves.  .  .  .  We  are 


^2  2  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

not  blind  to  the  advantages  of  the  new,  but  unless  we  know  just  where  it 
will  lead  us,  we  prefer  to  let  it  pass  us  by.  (C.  V.  and  W.  H.  Wiser,  1951, 

PP-  153  f0 

In  Sirkanda  the  unfamiliar,  be  it  a  person  or  a  program  of  change, 
is  regarded  with  suspicion.  The  reasons  are  readily  apparent.  Contacts 
with  outsiders  have  been  limited  largely  to  contacts  with  policemen 
and  tax  collectors — two  of  the  most  unpopular  forms  of  life  in  the 
Pahari  taxonomy.  Such  officials  are  despised  and  feared,  not  only  be- 
cause they  make  trouble  for  villagers  in  the  line  of  duty  but  also 
because  they  extort  bribes  on  the  threat  of  causing  further  trouble 
and  often  seem  to  take  advantage  of  their  official  position  to  vent  their 
aggressions  on  these  vulnerable  people.  Since  India's  independence, 
governmental  responsibilities  have  increased  and  extended  to  matters 
previously  ignored,  such  as  closer  supervision  of  enlarged  government 
forest  lands  and  rationing  of  certain  goods.  The  grounds  for  inter- 
fering in  village  affairs  have  multiplied  as  the  variety  of  officials  has 
proliferated.  Any  stranger,  therefore,  may  be  a  government  agent  and 
as  such  he  is  potentially  troublesome  and  even  dangerous. 

Villagers'  fears  on  this  score  are  not  groundless.  Aside  from  the 
unjust  exploitation  which  such  agents  are  reputed  to  employ,  the 
villagers  themselves  carry  on  many  illegal  or  semilegal  activities  which 
could  be  grounds  for  punishment  and  are  easily  used  as  an  excuse 
for  extortion.  In  Sirkanda,  government  forest  lands  and  products  have 
been  illegally  appropriated  by  villagers,  taxable  land  has  been  under- 
reported,  liquor  is  brewed  and  sold  illicitly,  women  have  been  il- 
legally sold,  guns  have  gone  unlicensed,  adulterated  milk  is  sold  to 
outside  merchants,  marriages  of  children  under  legal  age  are  per- 
formed, men  have  fled  the  army  or  escaped  from  jail,  and  property 
has  been  illegally  acquired  from  fleeing  Muslims  at  the  time  of  parti- 
tion. Any  of  these  and  similar  real  and  imagined  infractions  may  be 
objects  of  a  stranger's  curiosity  and  therefore  are  reasons  for  discourag- 
ing his  presence  in  the  village. 

Paharis  are  thought  by  people  of  the  plains  to  be  ritually,  spiritually, 
and  morally  inferior.  They  are  suspected  of  witchcraft  and  evil  magic. 
In  addition,  they  are  considered  naive  bumpkins;  the  hillbilly  stereo- 
type of  other  cultures  is  shared  by  Indians.  Paharis  try  to  avoid  inter- 
action with  those  who  hold  these  stereotypes.  Alien  Brahmins  may 
seek  to  discredit  their  Pahari  counterparts  by  finding  evidence  of  their 
unorthodoxy;  alien  traders  may  seek  to  relieve  Paharis  of  their  hard- 
earned  cash  or  produce  by  sharp  business  practices;  scoundrels  may 
seek  to  waylay  or  abduct  village  women;  thieves  may  come  to  steal 
their  worldly  possessions;  lawyers  or  their  cohorts  may  seek  evidence 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  323 

for  trumped-up  legal  proceedings  which  a  poor  Pahari  could  not  hope 
to  counteract  in  court.  Christians  may  hope  to  infringe  on  their  reli- 
gious beliefs  and  practices.  Strangers  are  therefore  suspected  of  having 
ulterior  motives  even  if  they  are  not  associated  with  the  government. 

The  only  way  to  feel  sure  that  such  dangers  do  not  inhere  in  a 
person  is  to  know  who  he  is,  and  to  know  this  he  must  fit  somewhere 
into  the  known  social  system.  Only  then  is  he  subject  to  effective  local 
controls  so  that  if  he  transgresses,  or  betrays  a  trust,  he  can  be  brought 
to  account.  The  person  who  is  beyond  control  is  beyond  trust  and  is 
best  hurried  on  his  way. 

To  take  a  stranger's  advice  and  change  accepted  practices  would  be 
foolhardy.  In  view  of  past  experience  with  the  government,  govern- 
ment sanction  of  the  advocate  and  his  program  merely  serves  to  in- 
crease the  distrust  of  villagers. 

In  considering  cultural  factors  which  may  be  relevant  to  the  con- 
sistent failure  of  Sirkanda  villagers  to  respond  to  programs  of  village 
self-government  and  cooperative  efforts  toward  self-improvement,  cer- 
tain similarities  may  be  noted  to  the  situation  found  by  Banfield  in 
a  village  of  southern  Italy,  ".  .  .  the  extreme  poverty  and  backward- 
ness of  which  is  to  be  explained  largely  (but  not  entirely)  by  the  in- 
ability of  the  villagers  to  act  together  for  their  common  good  or,  in- 
deed, for  any  end  transcending  the  immediate,  material  interest  of  the 
nuclear  family"  (Banfield,  1958,  p.  10). 

This  ethos  is  defined  in  terms  of  the  hypothesis  by  Banfield  that 
the  villagers  act  according  to  the  following  implicit  rule:  "Maximize 
the  material,  short-run  advantage  of  the  nuclear  family;  assume  that 
all  others  will  do  likewise"  (ibid.,  p.  85). 

Adherence  to  this  rule  Banfield  terms  an  ethos  of  "amoral  familism." 
He  presents  a  list  of  seventeen  "logical  implications"  of  this  rule  (ibid., 
pp.  85-102).  Many  of  these  implications  as  well  as  other  observations 
by  Banfield  are  reminiscent  of  findings  reported  here  and  in  other 
studies  of  Indian  family  and  village  life,  with  the  qualification  that  in 
India  the  relevant  unit  is  the  extended  rather  than  the  nuclear  family. 
There  is  a  temptation  to  ascribe  to  this  society  a  characteristic  of 
"amoral  familism"  on  the  extended  family  level.  However,  as  Ban- 
field  points  out,  similar  observations  could  be  made  about  any  society. 

Amoral  familism  is  a  pattern  or  syndrome;  a  society  exhibiting  some  of 
the  constituent  elements  of  the  syndrome  is  decisively  different  from  one 
exhibiting  all  of  them  together.  Moreover,  the  matter  is  one  of  degree:  no 
matter  how  selfish  or  unscrupulous  most  of  its  members  may  be,  a  society  is 
not  amorally  individualistic  (or  familistic)  if  there  is  somewhere  a  significant 
element  of  public  spiritedness  or  even  of  "enlightened"  self  interest.  (Ban- 
field,  1958,  pp.  11  f.) 


324  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

In  view  of  this  rigorous  requirement,  Sirkanda  villagers  are  ex- 
cluded from  "amoral  familism"  even  on  the  extended  family  level. 
"Amoral  factionalism,"  "amoral  casteism,"  and  so  on,  are  also  ex- 
cluded; there  are  too  many  occasions  upon  which  behavior  is  incon- 
sistent with  the  rule  of  total  commitment  to  the  short-run  material 
advantage  of  these  groups.  The  symptoms  do  not  add  up  to  the  syn- 
drome. Perhaps  elsewhere  in  India  there  are  groups  to  which  the  syn- 
drome does  apply — or  more  nearly  so.  This  does  not  mean  that  Ban- 
field's  conception  is  useless  for  an  understanding  of  social  behavior 
in  Sirkanda  or  other  Indian  villages.  Its  real  usefulness  is  that  it  points 
up  the  "moral  basis"  for  characteristic  social  behavior.  That  is,  there 
may  be  a  cultural  norm  or  world  view,  an  ethos,  a  pattern  of  values 
and  attitudes,  which  predisposes  the  members  of  a  society  against 
combined  action  for  long-range  common  goals.  Similarly  there  may  be 
cultural  bases  for  rejection  of  change  or  of  certain  kinds  of  change. 
Certainly  in  Sirkanda  there  is  enough  "amoral"  preoccupation  with, 
and  loyalty  to,  the  extended  family  that  it  is  a  serious  obstacle  to 
community  action  and  leads  to  most  of  the  ramifications  which  Ban- 
field  has  listed  as  "logical  implications"  of  amoral  familism. 

In  Sirkanda  this  is  a  relative  matter.  In  interlineage  relations  the 
lineage  becomes  the  focus  of  self-interest;  in  inter-sib  relations  it  is 
the  sib;  in  intercaste  relations  it  is  the  caste.  In  intervillage  matters 
where  caste  loyalties  are  not  at  issue,  there  is  similar  preoccupation 
with  one's  own  community,  as  witness  the  Sirkanda  council's  refusal 
to  volunteer  work  on  trails  to  be  used  by  other  villages.  It  might  be 
argued  that  all  these  manifestations  of  group  self-interest  could  be 
reduced  to  "familism,"  since  the  family  is  the  unit  with  which  the 
individual  is  most  closely  identified  and  of  which  he  is  thinking  when 
he  takes  a  stand  on  issues  at  any  of  these  levels.  That  is,  he  may  take 
his  stand  on  the  basis  of  the  best  interests  of  the  family  which,  in 
certain  circumstances,  happen  to  coincide  with  sib,  caste,  or  commu- 
nity interests. 
*  i  / 

'Amoral"  self-interest  seems  especially  likely  to  function  at  the  level 
of  the  social  unit  which  acts  as  an  entity  in  facing  insecurity.  In  any 
event,  culturally  sanctioned  self-interest  on  family  and  other  levels  is 
a  matter  which  might  usefully  be  considered  along  with  other  cultural 
factors  by  anyone  attempting  to  influence  people  to  implement  action 
programs  in  India. 

One  aspect  of  this  feature  of  community  life  in  Sirkanda  is  the 
absence  of  an  effective  tradition  of  community  cooperation  in  any 
but  very  specific  contexts.  Another  is  the  absence  of  village-wide  ac- 
ceptance  of   formal    leadership.    Everyone   claims    to   make   his   own 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  325 

decisions,  and  those  who  advocate  their  viewpoints  for  others  are 
viewed  with  suspicion.  Neither  is  there  a  precedent  for  democratic 
village  government. 

Opler  has  described  perhaps  the  most  crucial  obstacle  to  community 
development  programs  as  "the  social  organizational  difficulty  of  ex- 
pecting a  social  structure  which  was  essentially  fluid,  diffuse  and  con- 
servative to  implement  programs  which  demand  decision,  dispatch, 
and  an  experimental  frame  of  mind"  (Opler,  i960,  p.  197). 

The  controlling  group  in  Sirkanda  has  always  been  the  high-caste 
landowners,  and  they  remain  so  today.  Although  they  are  not  a  co- 
ordinated body  on  many  matters,  they  are  coordinated  in  their  relation- 
ship to  the  low  castes,  whom  they  control  in  almost  every  sphere.  This 
leads  to  one  of  the  most  perplexing  problems  in  community  develop- 
ment in  Sirkanda,  the  conflicting  interests  of  high  and  low  castes. 

Sirkanda  has  a  sharply  segmented  society  with  important  privileges 
granted  to  high  castes  and  withheld  from  low  castes.  High  castes 
naturally  have  a  heavy  stake  in  maintaining  the  status  quo.  The 
Congress  party  and  the  government  of  India  have  proclaimed  an 
equalitarian,  anticaste  ideal.  To  Sirkanda  villagers  this  is  one  im- 
portant characteristic  of  "government"  and  of  "Congress."  This  alien- 
ates high-caste  people  from  the  government  and  its  representatives, 
who  are  assumed  to  be  dangerous  radicals  who  threaten  the  traditional 
system.  They  feel  that  ultimately  the  government  will  force  them  to 
associate  with  their  caste  inferiors  and  will  help  low  castes  to  in- 
dependence, prosperity,  and  arrogance,  possibly  at  high-caste  expense 
and  certainly  to  their  detriment.  This  is  an  important  and  explicit 
reason  why  high  castes  refuse  to  cooperate  with  government  people 
and  programs  in  Sirkanda. 

Low-caste  people  have  been  hopeful  of  improved  status  and  liveli- 
hood on  exactly  these  grounds.  They  hope  to  benefit  from  the  govern- 
ment's attitudes  and  programs.  The  Community  Development  Pro- 
gram, as  it  has  functioned  thus  far,  has  been  designed  primarily  to 
benefit  agriculturists — the  high-caste,  well-off  landowners.  This  is  to 
be  expected  because,  as  Lewis  (1959,  p.  536)  has  pointed  out,  the  main 
aim  of  the  program  has  been  "increases  in  production  rather  than 
social  justice"  (cf.  Dube,  1958,  pp.  82  f.).  This  has  become  apparent  to 
low-caste  Sirkanda  villagers,  who  note  that  the  VLW  does  not  talk  to 
them  or  consider  their  problems  and  obviously  has  no  interest  in  aid- 
ing them.  He  merely  tries  to  help  those  who  already  are  well-off  and 
in  control.  Low  castes  have  not  benefited  from  the  program,  and  there 
has  been  no  action  taken  to  implement  the  government's  equalitarian 
pronouncements.  Therefore,  low-caste  people  are  disillusioned  about 


326  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

the  government's  stated  interest  in  them  and  their  welfare.  As  a  result 
they  are  alienated  from  the  Community  Development  Program  and 
other  governmental  activities  in  the  village. 

High-caste  people  are  antagonistic  to  the  government,  partly  be- 
cause of  its  alleged  interest  in  the  equalitarian  ideal,  which  they  feel 
will  ultimately  result  in  active  championing  of  low-caste  grievances. 
The  government's  clumsy  attempts  to  increase  agricultural  production 
in  the  village  have  not  succeeded  in  counteracting  this  antagonism, 
and  at  the  same  time  have  contributed  to  alienation  of  the  low  castes. 

Thus,  low  castes  want  their  positions  improved;  high  castes  want 
their  positions  maintained  by  suppression  of  the  low  castes.  The  gov- 
ernment has  alienated  the  low  castes  by  their  actions,  and  the  high 
castes  by  their  words.  This  is  a  dilemma  that  has  not  received  explicit 
recognition  but  which  is  very  real  in  Sirkanda  and  has  no  readily 
apparent  solution  without  a  choice  between  production  and  social 
justice. 

Other  reasons  for  the  failure  of  programs,  and  for  the  general  atti- 
tude toward  the  government  in  Sirkanda,  are  to  be  found  in  the  nature 
of  the  programs,  their  manner  of  presentation,  and  the  personnel  who 
have  presented  them.  Since  these  are  matters  directly  amenable  to 
action  by  those  responsible  for  the  implementation  of  changes,  it  is 
appropriate  to  consider  them  here. 

THE    PROGRAMS 

In  general,  the  programs  have  ignored  the  traditional  orientations 
of  villagers  and  have  not  been  in  line  with  the  desires  or  "felt  needs" 
of  the  people. 

Dumont  and  Pocock  (1957,  P-  19>  c^-  Tinker,  1959)  have  attributed 
the  lack  of  success  of  village  government  throughout  Uttar  Pradesh 
to  lack  of  understanding  of  the  culture  of  those  being  governed: 

They  have  tried  to  transfer  the  idea  of  the  assembly  or  pancdyat  from  a 
caste-group  to  the  multi-caste  village.  The  result,  according  to  our  own  ob- 
servations confirmed  by  reports  from  elsewhere  (all  in  U.P.)  is  a  standstill 
since  the  enterprise  comes  up  against  the  total  disinterest  of  the  elected 
judges.  The  institution  of  the  caste  pancdyat  rests  on  the  solidarity  of  the 
caste-group,  which  is  highly  sensitive  to  certain  kinds  of  offenses,  while  the 
assumed  solidarity  of  the  village  is  simply  nonexistent  at  that  level. 

This  criticism  would  seem  to  be  applicable  in  Sirkanda  to  a  large 
extent,  although  it  would  have  to  be  modified  in  view  of  the  essentially 
one-caste  nature  of  the  Sirkanda  council  today  and  the  traditional 
dominance  of  that  same  caste  in  the  village. 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  327 

Specific  programs  in  Sirkanda  have  consistently  ignored  the  wants 
of  villagers  themselves.  Of  those  presented  in  1957-1958,  only  the 
water  supply  project  was  felt  by  villagers  to  be  really  worthwhile. 
An  earlier  attempt  to  improve  that  situation  had  ended  in  an  expensive 
fiasco  at  the  hands  of  an  unscrupulous  contractor,  so  there  was  great 
reluctance  to  try  anything  new.  The  VLW  was  unable  to  offer  good 
advice  on  the  matter  and  no  technically  qualified  person  who  could 
have  done  so  was  made  available,  although  the  council  requested  such 
advice.  The  community  center  evoked  interest  but  no  general  agree- 
ment. Other  programs  informally  introduced  or  advocated  by  the 
VLW  were  equally  unsuccessful.  Improved  seed,  seed  potatoes,  and 
chemical  fertilizer,  which  the  previous  VLW  had  attempted  to  intro- 
duce, were  rejected  by  villagers  largely  because  local  resources  were 
felt  to  be  sufficient.  Adequate  natural  fertilizer  and  local  seed  were 
available,  and  there  was  a  general  conviction  among  villagers  that 
seeds,  fertilizer,  and  agricultural  techniques  which  were  developed  or 
tested  in  the  plains  would  be  unsuccessful  in  the  hills.  Moreover,  they 
were  difficult  to  obtain.  They  had  to  be  purchased  in  a  distant  village 
of  the  valley,  and  by  the  time  they  were  transported  to  the  hills  they 
were  exorbitantly  expensive.  The  government  required  that  the  seed 
be  returned  with  25  per  cent  interest  and  that  it  be  carefully  cleaned, 
requirements  which  discouraged  villagers  from  its  use.  Seed  potatoes 
were  requested  by  one  villager,  but  the  minimum  allotment  was  more 
than  twice  what  he  could  use,  and  so  the  idea  was  dropped. 

In  the  case  of  the  ECS,  there  was  no  desire  among  villagers  for  the 
benefits  a  cooperative  credit  society  could  offer.  People  were  accus- 
tomed to  borrowing  from  one  another  or  to  obtaining  credit  from  a 
local  shop  when  necessary.  They  had  no  desire  to  risk  a  new  system, 
especially  one  which  they  did  not  understand  at  all. 

Thus,  a  general  lack  of  appropriate  programs  was  an  important 
factor  in  the  failure  of  the  VLW  and  the  ECS.  It  is  likely  that,  had 
the  VLW  been  able  to  present  the  people  with  a  useful  solution  to  the 
problem  of  their  distant  water  supply,  he  would  have  been  well  on 
the  way  to  winning  their  confidence.  Had  he  practiced  the  first  aid  and 
simple  medicine  (including  veterinary  medicine)  supposedly  at  his 
command,  he  certainly  would  have  won  favor.  Had  he  been  sensitive 
to  the  desires  of  villagers,  he  would  have  increased  his  chances  of 
establishing  rapport  and  ultimately  of  achieving  other  goals.  Among 
young  men  there  was  a  real  desire  for  organized  recreation  in  the 
village;  interest  had  been  expressed  in  volleyball  (introduced  briefly 
by  a  former  teacher)  and  evening  singing  and  music  sessions.  The 
VLW  ignored  these  interests — they  were  not  in  his  program. 


328  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

He  was  bound  by  policy  to  specific  programs  which  did  not  lead  to 
the  general  goals  of  winning  the  confidence  of  the  people  so  that  they 
might  be  helped  to  help  themselves.  What  was  needed  was  not  rigid 
application  of  programs,  but  study  of  local  conditions — cultural, 
ecological,  agricultural — so  that  appropriate  programs  might  have 
been  formulated  to  satisfy  some  of  the  immediate  wants  of  villagers. 
In  this  way  their  confidence  and  cooperation  might  have  been  won 
so  that  the  improved  standard  of  living  which  is  the  ultimate  goal  of 
community  development  could  be  obtained.  The  overt  goal  of  helping 
or  serving  people  was  in  practice  subordinated,  both  by  the  VLW  and 
by  higher  administrative  levels,  to  the  covert  goal  of  getting  minimal 
compliance,  on  paper,  with  official  programs.  As  a  result,  the  entire 
project  was  an  empty  facade.  In  administrative  headquarters  this 
area  had  achieved  a  record  as  a  successful  unit.  In  reality  it  was  a 
failure. 

Had  specific  local  programs  been  formulated  in  terms  of  general 
goals  of  community  development  and  had  accomplishment  of  covert 
goals  not  been  substituted  for  fulfillment  of  overt  goals,  success  might 
have  been  achieved. 

MANNER   OF    PRESENTATION 

Even  the  programs  which  might  have  been  successful  were  not 
presented  effectively  or  even  comprehensibly  to  villagers.  There  was 
no  effort  to  discuss  planned  programs  informally  in  advance  with 
household  heads  or  others  nor  to  invite  discussion  in  their  formulation. 
The  programs  were  invariably  presented  to  the  village  president,  who 
then  relayed  the  information  to  villagers  as  being  the  VLW's  plan, 
or  they  were  presented  through  the  village  council  without  advance 
warning.  The  villagers  had  no  chance  to  think  over  a  project  in  advance, 
much  less  to  ask  questions,  make  suggestions,  or  suggest  alternatives.  The 
VLW  is  known  by  the  title  "village  servant,"  but  his  projects  were 
presented  as  governmentally  decreed  programs  to  be  carried  out  by 
villagers  under  his  supervision.  Villagers  were  not  led  to  feel  that 
they  were  being  helped  to  help  themselves,  but  rather  that  they  were 
being  directed  to  meet  the  whims  of  a  government  which  did  not  under- 
stand their  problems  and  with  which  they  were  already  at  odds.  As  a 
result  their  resentment  was  compounded. 

The  government  repeatedly  demonstrated  its  ignorance  of,  and  in- 
difference to,  the  problems  of  the  villagers  by  advocating  programs 
with  no  apparent  local  relevance  (chemical  fertilizer,  Japanese  rice 
cultivation)  and  by  sending  as  its  representatives  personnel  with  no 
familiarity  with  the  way  of  life  of  people  in  the  hills.  Simple  misunder- 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  329 

standings  were  also  frequent,  based  partly  on  the  inability  of  the  VLW 
and  ECS  to  speak  or  understand  the  Pahari  language,  and  partly  on 
these  officials'  failure  to  explain  their  plans  adequately.  Thus,  villagers 
believed  that  their  investment  in  a  credit  cooperative  would  be 
"swallowed  up"  by  the  officials  of  some  government  agency  and  that 
it  could  not  be  refunded.  They  were  totally  unaware  of  some  of  the 
services  which  a  VLW  was  supposed  to  be  able  to  provide,  especially 
first  aid  and  medicine. 

PERSONNEL 

The  VLW  and  ECS  were  poorly  trained  and  poorly  motivated. 
They  had  no  special  preparation  for  work  in  these  rugged  and  isolated 
hills.  They  were  therefore  thought  of  by  villagers  as  complete  out- 
siders and  greenhorns.  Villagers  ridiculed  their  inability  to  get  around 
easily  on  the  rough  mountain  trails.  When  one  of  these  officials  made 
his  first  appearance  in  the  village,  he  was  guided  part  of  the  way 
by  a  small  village  boy.  Villagers  never  forgot  the  boy's  tale  of  how 
he  had  to  encourage  the  man  onward  at  narrow  points  on  the  trail  and 
how  the  man  inched  forward  on  all  fours,  asking  God's  mercy  as  he 
went.  These  officials  constantly  complained  of  the  unpleasant  sur- 
roundings, the  difficult  terrain,  and  their  own  loneliness  and  boredom. 
Their  meager  salaries  did  not  compensate  for  these  hardships.  The  hill 
environment  did  not  provide  them  with  the  rewards  to  which  they 
felt  their  education  and  official  position  entitled  them.  They  had  no 
intense  commitment  or  emotional  involvement  in  their  jobs,  as  did 
the  schoolteacher.  They  were  devoted  to  their  status  rather  than  to 
their  responsibilities.  They  did  not  receive  the  prestige,  public  ac- 
ceptance, or  personal  satisfaction  that  came  to  the  teacher  in  his 
well-known  and  widely  respected  profession.  As  a  result  they  were  per- 
sonally ineffective  workers  as  well  as  advocates  of  inappropriate  pro- 
grams. 

The  ECS  has  been  assigned  to  the  village  (perhaps  as  punishment) 
after  having  failed  the  training  program  for  the  post.  Both  the  men 
spent  much  of  their  energies  trying  to  effect  a  transfer  to  more  favor- 
able circumstances.  Worst  of  all,  from  the  point  of  view  of  their 
reception  by  villagers,  was  their  lack  of  understanding  of  or  interest 
in  the  people  with  whom  they  worked.  They  neither  understood  nor 
sympathized  with  the  way  of  life  and  problems  of  the  Paharis.  They 
considered  the  villagers  dirty,  ignorant,  and  immoral,  not  capable  of 
raising  their  standards  and  unworthy  of  close  association.  Their  lack 
of  knowledge  of  the  Pahari  language  contributed  to  this  state  of  affairs. 
They  could  not  even  communicate  easily  with  villagers.  As  a  result, 


330  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

neither  of  the  officials  talked  informally  with  villagers  or  came  to  know, 
even  superficially,  any  of  them  other  than  the  shopkeeper,  the  council 
president,  and  one  or  two  men  who  frequented  the  school  building 
where  these  men  lived.  Neither  of  the  officials  was  ever  seen  to  enter 
the  village  proper  nor  to  go  to  the  fields  where  villagers  worked,  in 
the  year  that  they  lived  on  its  outskirts.  They  won  neither  the  respect 
nor  the  trust  of  villagers.  Although  the  villagers  were  not  hospitable, 
it  might  be  expected  that  as  agents  of  change  these  officials  would 
have  made  a  real  effort  to  win  their  confidence  and  understand  their 
outlook.  Instead,  they  relied  entirely  upon  their  official  positions  in 
their  attempts  to  initiate  and  carry  out  programs.  Gandhi  has  com- 
mented on  the  fruitlessness  of  this  approach: 

When  an  official  becomes  a  reformer,  he  must  realize  that  his  official  posi- 
tion is  not  a  help  but  a  hindrance.  In  spite  of  his  Herculean  efforts  people  will 
suspect  him  and  his  motives,  and  they  will  scent  danger  where  there  is  none. 
And  when  they  do  certain  things,  they  often  do  them  more  to  please  the 
official  than  to  please  themselves.  (Gandhi,  1952,  p.  103) 

Education:  A  Successful  Program 

The  third  government  employee  in  Sirkanda  is  the  schoolteacher. 
Education  is  not  new  to  Sirkanda  villagers,  but  until  1950  they  had 
to  go  out  of  Sirkanda  to  get  it.  Usually  they  went  to  schools  in  one 
of  two  or  three  villages  of  the  valley  not  far  from  Bhatbair.  Even  now 
anyone  desiring  education  beyond  the  fifth  class  must  go  to  those  vil- 
lages, and  anyone  seeking  education  beyond  the  eighth  class  must  go 
into  Dehra  Dun.  People  as  old  as  60  years  acquired  some  education  in 
their  childhood.  Three  men  in  their  late  forties  have  had  an  eighth- 
grade  education.  There  are  24  local  students  currently  enrolled  in  or 
attending  classes  regularly  in  Sirkanda,  and  three  attend  higher  classes 
outside  Sirkanda.  In  addition  to  these  students,  36  villagers  have  at- 
tended a  village  or  outside  school  in  the  past — 33  Rajputs,  2  Brahmins, 
and  1  blacksmith.  Thirty-three  of  these  are  men  and  three  are  girls. 
The  girls  attended  school  in  the  village  after  1950.  In  addition,  one 
Brahmin  man  received  some  religious  training  in  another  hill  village. 
The  average  period  of  attendance  of  these  36  was  three  years;  five 
went  to  the  eighth  class,  and  four  completed  five  years.  It  is  obvious 
that  this  amount  of  schooling  cannot  make  for  a  high  rate  of  effective 
literacy.  While  all  who  have  gone  to  school  and  a  few  who  have  not 
can  sign  their  names,  many  can  read  or  write  little  if  at  all.  Little 
reading  or  writing  is  done  in  the  village  except  in  the  school,  and 
so  literacy  is  quickly  lost  by  those  who  acquire  it.  At  best  perhaps  half 
of  those  who  have  been  to  school  are  usefully  literate,  making  a  literacy 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  33 1 

rate  among  village  men  of  less  than  15  per  cent  and  that  for  women 
around  1  per  cent — a  village  rate  among  adults  of  less  than  8  per  cent. 

Attitudes  toward  education  in  Sirkanda  are  generally  not  favorable. 
School  is  thought  of  as  a  place  for  children  with  nothing  better  to  do. 
In  most  families  only  children  who  are  not  needed  elsewhere  are 
allowed  to  go.  Most  families  consider  education  for  girls  to  be  en- 
tirely useless  and  actually  detrimental.  As  a  result  of  these  attitudes, 
a  maximum  of  20  out  of  35  eligible  boys  in  Sirkanda  attend  the  local 
elementary  school  while  4  of  31  girls  do  so.  Most  children  are  in  agree- 
ment with  their  parents  on  this  issue,  but  at  least  one  small  girl  at- 
tended school  sporadically  despite  her  father's  refusal  to  enroll  her, 
and  one  boy  requested  private  tutoring  when  his  father  demanded  that 
he  work  during  school  hours.  Often  one  or  two  boys  of  a  large  family 
are  educated  and  others  are  not.  The  educated  one  is  usually  one  who 
shows  some  liking  or  aptitude  for  school  or,  perhaps  more  often,  who 
dislikes  other  work  or  is  unable  to  perform  it. 

One  of  the  most  successful  educated  men  of  Bhatbair  is  a  man  of 
another  village  who  began  school  at  the  age  of  14  after  an  attack  of 
pneumonia  which  left  him  weak  and  sickly.  His  father,  who  had 
previously  forbidden  education  in  his  family,  saw  the  boy's  weak  con- 
dition and  said,  "Now  he's  not  good  for  work,  he  may  as  well  sit  in 
the  school  each  day."  Despite  his  late  start  this  boy  went  on  through 
high  school,  got  a  job  on  the  office  staff  of  a  limestone  quarrying  com- 
pany and  quickly  advanced  to  an  excellent  position.  Now  he  is  edu- 
cating a  younger  sister  although  his  parents  insist  that  it  is  a  waste  to 
do  so. 

Family  size  and  land  ownership  are  important  factors.  A  small 
family,  especially  if  it  has  much  land,  cannot  afford  to  let  boys  go  to 
school  who  might  otherwise  be  helping  to  farm.  A  family's  wealth  is 
a  primary  factor,  especially  in  higher  education.  Sometimes  a  wealthy 
family  can  afford  to  hire  a  servant  to  do  a  boy's  work  so  that  he  can 
go  to  school  if  he  wishes.  Education  outside  the  village  is  expensive 
because  the  student  must  board.  The  only  Bhatbair  boy  to  go  to  college 
is  a  Brahmin  from  the  wealthiest  family  of  Kanda,  a  neighboring 
village.  All  those  in  Sirkanda  who  have  gone  outside  the  village  for 
schooling  have  been  from  the  wealthiest  families,  and  some  had  rela- 
tives near  the  valley  with  whom  they  could  live  and  from  whose  homes 
they  could  commute  to  school. 

Establishing  schools  in  Bhatbair  was  not  an  easy  task.  Three  one- 
teacher  schools  were  authorized  in  1949,  one  in  each  of  the  three 
largest  villages,  with  a  potential  enrollment  of  around  50  students 
each.  Teachers  were  assigned  by  the  Dehra  Dun  District  Board  in 


332  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

1950.  They  were  all  well-trained,  young  but  experienced,  apparently 
quite  highly  motivated,  and,  most  important,  were  from  other  hill 
areas  so  that  the  living  conditions,  terrain,  language,  and  culture  of 
the  area  were  not  strange  to  them.  In  each  village  where  they  have 
established  schools  they  have  come  to  know  villagers  on  a  personal 
level  and  have  to  a  considerable  extent  been  accepted  by  them.  How- 
ever, in  the  initial  stages  they  were  beset  by  many  difficulties.  In  one 
of  the  three  villages  originally  picked  for  a  school  (and  it  is  a  village 
with  a  long-standing  reputation  for  inhospitality),  the  teacher  was 
unable  to  get  a  single  pupil  to  attend  school.  After  several  months  he 
was  authorized  to  move  to  a  village  with  one-sixth  of  the  potential 
student  body,  but  one  more  favorably  disposed  toward  education.  It 
is  a  village  made  up  entirely  of  relatives  of  the  wealthy  Brahmin  who 
serves  as  the  traditional  Sirkanda  priest.  There  the  teacher  has  run 
a  school  on  the  veranda  of  a  house  for  six  years,  with  an  average  of 
five  pupils  in  attendance.  The  other  teachers  did  somewhat  better  in 
Kanda  and  Sirkanda  where  eight  to  fifteen  students  have  attended  the 
schools  over  this  period. 

In  1957,  when  a  new  teacher  came  to  Sirkanda,  he  found  an  attend- 
ing student  body  of  8  students  and  an  official  register  of  over  20.  He 
found  the  standard  of  achievement  extremely  low.  Being  a  conscien- 
tious person,  he  set  about  to  rectify  both  matters  and  he  met  with 
remarkable  success.  On  the  point  of  attendance,  he  was  faced  with 
three  alternatives:  (1)  continue  to  falsify  the  attendance  record  as  his 
predecessor  evidently  had,  under  pressure  from  the  District  Board  to 
increase  enrollment,  though  this  involved  the  risk  of  detection  and 
punishment;  (2)  report  the  truth  of  the  matter,  thus  provoking  an 
investigation  that  would  hurt  either  the  previous  teacher,  himself,  or 
both;  (3)  raise  the  enrollment  to  match  the  records,  a  seemingly  hope- 
less task.  This  teacher  elected  to  follow  the  last  course  and  in  a  period 
of  three  months  he  had,  by  begging,  cajoling,  and  threatening,  man- 
aged to  raise  his  regular  daily  attendance  from  8  to  around  20.  He 
received  no  credit  for  this  beyond  his  own  satisfaction  and  peace  of 
mind.  No  one  in  the  village  cared,  and  the  increase  in  attendance  did 
not  show  on  his  records  to  higher  officials. 

As  to  achievement,  the  teacher  undertook  to  raise  standards  by 
intensive  effort,  discipline,  and  some  tutoring.  His  success  is  indicated 
by  the  fact  that  the  only  candidate  for  the  fifth-class  examinations,  an 
exceptionally  backward  pupil  at  the  beginning  of  his  fifth  year,  passed 
the  district  examinations  in  the  upper  third  of  the  group  examined. 
For  this,  too,  the  teacher  received  no  credit  from  villagers,  and  his 
efforts  were  unknown  to  the  school  authorities. 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  333 

The  teacher's  efforts  were  not  unappreciated  by  his  students.  Of  31 
students,  roughly  20  of  whom  were  in  attendance  on  any  particular 
day,  there  was  a  core  of  about  10  who  attended  consistently.  That  is, 
10  students  came  regularly,  while  of  the  remaining  21  an  average  of 
about  10  appeared  daily.  The  consistent  attendees  appeared  to  be 
sincerely  interested  in  school  and  respectful  and  appreciative  of  the 
teacher.  Several  of  the  other  students  were  equally  interested  but 
lacked  the  support  of  their  families  which  would  have  enabled  them 
to  attend  regularly.  It  was  the  interest  displayed  by  these  pupils 
which  inspired  the  teacher  in  his  largely  thankless  task.  He  was  espe- 
cially pleased  when  one  of  his  students,  on  his  own  initiative,  took 
English  lessons  from  the  anthropologist's  interpreter  for  a  period  of 
three  or  four  months.  However,  neither  the  schoolteacher  nor  any 
villager  knew  English,  and  the  boy  finally  gave  up  the  effort. 

The  school  year  in  Sirkanda  consisted  of  about  a  5-hour  day  of 
classwork,  5%  days  a  week  for  approximately  10  months  per  year.  The 
curriculum  was  similar  to  that  in  elementary  schools  throughout 
Uttar  Pradesh,  consisting  of  exercises  in  reading,  writing,  and  arith- 
metic and  occasional  study  of  stories,  religion,  history,  and  geography, 
all  by  rote.  There  was  no  attempt  to  relate  school  studies  to  practical 
problems  of  village  life. 

Official  school  enrollment  in  Sirkanda  was  25  at  its  maximum,  and 
with  6  unenrolled  attendees,  attendance  remained  consistently  at 
around  20  despite  daily  absentees,  except  in  the  harvest  periods  and 
heavy  rains,  when  it  dropped  to  around  10.  Seven  of  these  pupils  (2 
Bajgis,  1  Muslim,  and  4  Brahmins)  were  boys  from  two  other  villages 
about  three  miles  distant,  who  came  daily  over  an  extremely  rough  trail. 
Twenty-one  enrolled  and  unenrolled  Sirkanda  students  were  Rajputs, 
2  were  blacksmiths  and  1  a  Brahmin,  and  only  4  (all  Rajputs)  were 
girls.  Grade  distribution  reflects  both  the  drop-out  rate  and  the  suc- 
cessful recruitment  of  beginners  by  the  new  teacher:  first  grade,  1 1 
enrolled  and  6  in  informal  attendance;  second  grade,  5  enrolled;  third 
grade,  4  enrolled;  fourth  grade,  3  enrolled;  fifth  grade,  1  enrolled. 
Only  one  girl  attended  at  all  regularly. 

Three  Sirkanda  boys  were  enrolled  in  high  schools  in  1957-1958, 
one  each  in  the  seventh  and  eighth  grades  in  Majra,  a  village  border- 
ing the  valley,  and  one  in  high  school  (ninth  grade)  in  Dehra  Dun. 
At  the  end  of  the  year,  one  Sirkanda  student  went  on  to  the  sixth 
class  at  Majra  and  the  eighth-grader  there  went  on  to  high  school  in 
Dehra  Dun. 

It  seems  likely  that  when  a  high  school  is  established  in  Majra, 
where  the  sixth,  seventh,  and  eighth  classes  are  currently  held,  more 


334  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

Sirkanda  boys  will  pursue  their  education.  Such  a  school  is  under 
construction  and  is  expected  to  be  opened  in  a  year  or  two.  There, 
as  villagers  point  out,  the  boys  can  live  with  relatives  and  attend 
school  relatively  inexpensively,  without  being  exposed  to  the  tempta- 
tions of  city  life. 

The  school,  then,  is  a  government  enterprise  that  has  fared  better 
in  Sirkanda  and  neighboring  villages  than  have  other  programs.  The 
reasons  for  this  success  are  several.  The  school  is  an  institution  to 
which  villagers  have  become  accustomed  over  a  long  period  of  time, 
first  outside  the  village  and  more  recently  in  the  village.  Its  potential 
value  in  achieving  tangible  results  in  the  form  of  jobs  and  prestige 
is  obvious  to  all,  though  many  hold  that  these  results  are  not  suitable 
or  attainable  for  their  children.  The  teacher's  role  is  a  familiar  one 
to  villagers,  and  his  purposes  and  functions,  although  not  always  ap- 
proved, are  at  least  understood.  He  may  be  a  bother  and  a  distracting 
influence  to  children  who  could  be  better  engaged  elsewhere,  but  at 
least  he  does  not  pose  a  threat  to  adult  villagers  nor  is  he  suspected  of 
ulterior  motives.  He  is  not,  in  the  conventional  sense,  an  agent  of 
authority.  In  these  respects  he  is  different  from  other  government 
employees. 

Teachers  have  been  consistently  effective  as  individuals  in  this  area. 
They  have  been  relatively  well  trained  in  teacher  training  schools. 
They  are  self-selected,  doing  what  they  planned  to  do  in  a  well-estab- 
lished profession  with  a  secure  future.  They  have  been  intelligently 
assigned,  with  their  own  cultural  background  in  mind.  Indicative  of 
their  appropriateness  for  their  jobs  is  the  length  of  their  tenure  in 
these  jobs  despite  isolation  and  frustrating  working  conditions:  6, 
6,  and  4  years  for  the  three  recent  teachers,  and  the  replacement  for 
the  last  of  these  is  beginning  his  second  year  without  yet  seeking 
transfer.  They  have  consistently  established  fairly  good  rapport  with 
villagers,  considering  the  obstacles  which  any  outsider  faces  in  the 
closed  society  of  the  area.  This  did  not  come  easily.  One  or  two  years 
were  required  for  each  to  gain  acceptance,  but  from  the  point  of  view 
of  the  program  the  time  has  probably  been  well  spent.  Rapid  turn- 
over of  personnel  would  have  precluded  the  possibility  of  achieving 
such  rapport. 

Some  of  the  important  factors  which  have  led  to  failure  of  other 
programs  in  the  village  have  therefore  not  characterized  the  educa- 
tional program.  The  goals  have  been  relatively  consistent.  In  the  con- 
text of  Indian  or  at  least  district  educational  policy  covert  goals  have 
been  the  same  as  overt  goals  (the  principal  disparity  being  in  the 
emphasis  upon  enrollment  versus  actual  attendance),  and  general  goals 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  335 

(teaching  children  facts  and  skills  as  outlined  in  the  curriculum)  have 
been  in  harmony  with  specific  goals  (enabling  children  to  pass  the 
examinations,  or  at  least  to  fail  them  only  after  a  noble  try). 

In  spite  of  its  relative  success,  education  has  not  been  enthusiastically 
received  in  Sirkanda.  The  teacher's  job  is  a  frustrating  and  thankless 
one.  This  can  in  part  be  attributed  to  villagers'  suspicion  of  outsiders; 
in  part  to  antigovernment  sentiments;  in  part  to  lack  of  enthusiasm 
about  education.  The  last-mentioned  factor  is  conditioned  to  a  large 
extent  by  the  lack  of  tangible  benefits  to  those  who  have  been  educated 
in  the  past.  To  many  villagers  education  is  simply  irrelevant  in  tradi- 
tional village  life,  the  only  way  of  life  accessible  to  these  people.  Vil- 
lage education  is  not  conducive  to  orientation  toward  the  outside,  nor 
sufficient  to  enable  people  to  make  a  success  of  life  on  the  outside,  nor 
is  it  of  any  great  practical  value  in  the  village.  Its  demonstrated  value 
in  Sirkanda  is  only  that  it  brings  to  the  villager  the  advantages  of  a 
limited  literacy  (which  villagers  are  coming  to  appreciate  in  the  light 
of  increasing  necessity  to  deal  with  the  government)  and  some  general 
awareness  of  geography,  history,  and  nationalism.  The  villager  is 
presumably  thus  helped  to  become  a  more  responsible  citizen  in  a 
republic — an  official  goal  of  education  of  which  villagers  are  unaware. 

However,  to  the  extent  that  education  has  been  successful  and  is 
becoming  more  so,  we  have  presumptive  evidence  that  inherent  cul- 
tural factors  do  not  preclude  success  in  governmental  programs.  Care- 
fully planned  programs  presented  intelligently  by  properly  trained 
and  motivated  people  can  be  successful  in  the  village.  If  they  have 
the  further  advantage  of  fulfilling  a  "felt  need"  and  bringing  a  tangible 
benefit,  their  success  is  even  more  likely.  With  initial  hard-earned 
successes,  subsequent  accomplishments  might  be  expected  to  come 
more  easily  as  traditional  suspicions  are  allayed. 

Balance  of  External  Relations 

Relations  between  Sirkanda  and  the  outside  can  be  summarized 
by  saying  that  on  the  whole,  intrusions  from  the  outside  into  the 
village  have  far  outweighed,  in  numbers  and  effect,  the  extensions  of 
the  village  into  the  outside  world.  That  is,  while  villagers  do  go  out 
of  the  hill  area  for  trade  and  pilgrimage,  and  village  boys  and  young 
men  not  infrequently  seek  adventure  in  other  areas,  the  excursions 
are  short-lived  and  usually  result  in  greater  appreciation  of  the  village 
and  its  familiar  way  of  life.  Those  who  have  been  outside  bring  back 
stories  of  their  adventures  and  certain  material  goods  obtained  there, 
but  they  do  not  often  bring  lasting  changes  to  the  village.  On  the  other 


336  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

hand,  government  activity  in  the  village,  and  to  a  lesser  extent  outside 
merchants  and  others,  have  brought  into  the  village  a  number  of  alien 
ideas,  practices,  and  material  goods.  Although  the  activity  of  outsiders 
has  recently  increased  in  effect,  it  is  not  a  recent  thing.  Under  the 
British  and  before  that  under  the  Garhwal  Raja,  outside  government 
impinged  on  Sirkanda,  and  traders  have  long  frequented  the  village. 
And  for  fifty  years  schooling  has  been  acquired  by  some  village  children. 

Within  the  more  restricted  area  of  the  "marriage  network"  sur- 
rounding Sirkanda — the  immediate  culture  area — but  not  extending  to 
"outside"  or  urban  areas,  it  is  evident  that  extensions  of  the  village 
are  many  and  pervasive,  as  with  the  plains  village,  Senapur,  of  which 
Opler  (1956,  p.  10)  writes,  "the  involvement  of  .  .  .  villagers  with 
organizations,  places,  and  events  outside  of  the  village  is  considerable 
and  it  seems  that  this  has  been  the  case  for  a  very  long  time." 

The  fact  that  this  village,  like  communities  everywhere,  has  such 
relations  and  extensions  does  not  make  it  any  less  a  functional  unit. 
This  fact  merely  puts  it  into  perspective  as  one  unit  within  a  larger 
complex  of  systems  on  several  different  levels. 

In  discussing  the  problem  of  extensions  of  village  communities  to 
the  extra-community  world,  R.  J.  Smith  (1956,  p.  4)  has  said: 

There  are  three  types  of  extensions: 

1.  Intellectual  awareness 

2.  Physical  mobility 

3.  Organizational  affiliation  (or  membership). 

These  are  not,  of  course,  water-tight  compartments,  and  it  is  unlikely  that 
any  one  activity  or  extension  will  be  entirely  one  or  the  other  of  these. 

It  is  evident  from  the  discussion  above  that  all  three  of  these  types 
are  found,  in  varying  degrees,  in  the  relationship  of  Sirkanda  to  the 
outside  world.  However,  a  fourth  type  of  extension  was  of  interest 
in  this  research  and  appears  to  be  crucial  to  community  cohesion  and 
relevant  to  cultural  change.  This  is  individual  or  group  identification 
with  an  outside  group.  That  is,  in  addition  to  awareness  of,  mobility  to, 
or  organizational  affiliation  with,  an  outside  group,  there  is  also  the 
possibility  of  adoption  of  that  group  as  an  identification  group  or,  as 
it  is  commonly  known  in  the  sociological  literature,  a  reference  group 
(Newcomb,  1950,  pp.  225  f.;  Turner,  1956,  p.  328). 

One  of  the  aims  of  the  research  reported  here  was  to  investigate  fac- 
tors relevant  to  social  cohesion  and  disintegration  in  the  community. 

Unfortunately,  comparative  data  from  a  culturally  similar  com- 
munity is  not  at  hand.  There  is,  however,  some  literature  of  a  theoret- 
ical nature  on  the  subject,  and  the  writer  has  made  comparable  ob- 


THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD  337 

servations  in  a  community  in  the  Aleutian  Islands  of  North  America 
which  provide  some  useful  contrasts  (Berreman,  1955).  In  the  Aleutian 
village,  it  was  found  that  individuals  tended  to  identify  consistently 
with  an  alien  group,  non-Aleut  participants  in  the  urban  culture  of 
the  mainland.  This  attitude  was  disintegrative  to  the  community  be- 
cause the  norms  of  the  alien  group  could  not  be  realized  in  the  con- 
text of  the  isolated  community.  People  had  to  leave  the  community 
to  achieve  any  chance  of  acceptance  by  members  of  the  group  providing 
the  frames  of  reference  which  influence  their  attitudes  and  behavior, 
or  even  to  be  able  to  practice  this  behavior  and  satisfy  their  aspirations. 
The  situation  was  attributable  largely  to  the  influx  into  the  community 
of  alien  agents  of  socialization,  who  represented  the  source  of  authority 
and  of  rewards  in  the  community  and  who  instilled  in  its  members 
values  which  were  not  realizable  in  the  community  context.  As  a  result, 
people  began  to  look  outside  the  community  for  their  standards  of 
behavior  and  achievement.  Unable  to  meet  these  standards  in  the 
village  they  left,  or  remained  as  frustrated  "marginal  men."  Their 
plight  was  evident  in  the  high  emigration  rate  and  the  many  types  of 
stress  experienced  by  individuals  in  the  village,  including  stress  of 
unprecedented  kinds  for  which  no  adaptive  mechanisms  were  readily 
available. 

On  the  basis  of  that  example  it  was  hypothesized  that  "persistently 
attempted  projection  to  an  .  .  .  alien  context,  if  it  cannot  be  achieved 
by  community  members  within  their  community,  is  disintegrative  to 
that  community"  (Berreman,  1955,  p.  58).  That  is,  to  the  extent  that 
members  of  the  community  adopt  values  which  cannot  be  realized  in 
the  community  but  can  be  realized  outside  the  community,  that 
community  is  likely  to  disintegrate.  Such  values  are  most  often  ac- 
quired from  alien  reference  groups — groups  which  are  the  sources  of 
authority  and  rewards.  Such  groups  are  especially  potent  when  they 
are  in  key  positions  as  agents  of  socialization  of  children  (for  ex- 
ample, teachers),  as  they  were  in  the  Aleutian  community.  To  state  it 
differently,  a  high  positive  correlation  exists  between  the  extent  to 
which  individuals'  reference  groups  are  also  their  membership  groups 
and  the  integration  of  the  community  as  evidenced  by  other  criteria 
of  integration. 

In  attempting  to  counteract  disintegrative  trends  in  a  community, 
success  is  as  likely  to  be  achieved  (and  probably  more  realistically  so) 
by  making  new  values  achievable  within  the  community  as  by  trying 
to  prevent  their  acquisition  or  by  trying  to  reestablish  traditional 
values. 

Sirkanda  offers  a  notable  contrast  to  the  Aleutian  village  in  its 


338  THE    OUTSIDE    WORLD 

state  of  cohesion  or  integration  as  a  community.  In  Sirkanda  there  is 
little  in  the  way  of  adoption  of  alien  values  or  reference  groups  aside 
from  the  ritual  sphere,  where  plains  standards  are  adopted  as  a  means 
of  social  mobility.  Socialization  remains  primarily  in  the  hands  of 
villagers.  Schooling  within  the  village  has  been  relatively  innocuous 
from  this  point  of  view.  It  has  reached  relatively  few  villagers  with 
any  significant  intensity.  Moreover,  teachers  have  been  of  the  same 
general  Pahari  cultural  background  as  the  villagers.  The  curriculum 
has  not  taught  an  alien  way  of  life,  nor  has  it  conflicted  in  many 
respects  with  traditional  values  of  villagers.  Village  schooling  (unlike 
that  obtained  in  Dehra  Dun)  has  not  turned  students'  aspirations  to 
the  outside,  nor  has  it  lessened  their  effectiveness  as  villagers.  This 
situation  is  in  sharp  contrast  to  that  in  the  Aleutian  village  (Berreman, 

1955»  PP-  54  £•)■ 

In  Sirkanda  there  has  as  yet  been  no  significant  interest  in  move- 
ment to  the  outside,  no  significant  dissatisfaction  with  village  life. 
There  are  few  signs  of  stress  in  individuals  or  groups  that  are  not  well 
within  the  traditional  and  expectable  range  and  are  therefore  dealt 
with  effectively  in  traditional  ways.  The  village  is,  within  the  tradi- 
tional cultural  context,  which  includes  caste  and  factional  divisions, 
cohesive  and  well-integrated  by  most  indexes  that  could  be  set  forth. 
This  does  not  mean  that  it  will  remain  so.  The  two  recent  emigrants 
to  city  jobs  may  be  straws  in  the  new  wind  which  is  blowing  in  India, 
generated  by  increasing  awareness  of  other  ways  of  living  and  resulting, 
as  with  these  two  men,  in  identification  with  another  way  of  life  and 
attempts  to  become  part  of  it. 

Traditional  ties  are  strong  in  India.  Even  villages  near  large  cities 
remain  remarkably  cohesive,  and  people  who  go  to  cities  to  work 
generally  retain  close  ties  in  their  home  villages.  Pahari  villages  very 
close  to  Dehra  Dun  are  tied  culturally,  socially,  and  religiously  much 
more  closely  to  the  hills  than  to  the  city.  Urban  emigration  in  them 
is  virtually  unknown.  Attitudes  and  behavior  of  their  residents  seem 
to  differ  surprisingly  little  from  those  of  their  fellows  in  more  isolated 
villages.  It  is  a  question  to  what  extent  education  may  alter  this  situ- 
ation. So  far,  the  evidence  in  Sirkanda  does  not  contradict  the  hypoth- 
esis regarding  community  cohesion  derived  in  the  Aleutian  village. 
These  are  two  extreme  cases  which  follow  the  expected  pattern.  Further 
work  in  less  clear-cut  circumstances  is  needed  for  more  substantial 
verification. 


10 


CONCLUSION 


The  function  and  relative  significance  of  ties  of  kinship,  caste,  and 
community  in  the  lives  of  people  in  and  around  Sirkanda  have  been 
a  major  focus  of  this  research.  Implicit  in  this  focus  is  a  belief  that 
the  findings  will  be  relevant  to  an  understanding  of  other  villages 
not  only  within  this  culture  area,  but  throughout  Northern  India 
and  to  a  lesser  extent  in  India  at  large. 

In  the  five  chapters  immediately  preceding  this  one  it  has  been 
demonstrated  that  each  of  these  levels  of  organization  is  vital  in  the 
lives  of  Sirkanda  villagers.  They  are  the  structural  framework  for 
Pahari  culture  and  social  interaction.  They  come  into  prominence  in 
varying  degrees  in  various  situations.  Of  the  three,  kinship  ties  are 
of  most  immediate  significance  in  the  lives  of  individuals.  The  patri- 
local  extended  family  is  the  residential  unit,  the  property-owning  and 
work  group,  the  group  that  finds  wives  for  its  sons,  that  participates 
most  actively  in  the  life-cycle  rites  of  its  members,  that  worships  com- 
mon gods  together,  and  that  applies  safeguards  and  sanctions  to  its 
members  to  keep  the  family  reputation  untarnished.  It  is,  in  short, 
the  basic  economic,  social,  and  religious  unit.  Above  it,  the  lineage, 
clan,  sib,  and  kindred  are  kin  groups  which  function  in  many  contexts 
as  social  and  religious  units  of  progressively  less  relevance  to  the  in- 
dividual. Informal  organization  within  the  caste  and  community  tends 
to  follow  lines  of  kinship.  Those  kin  ties  are  strongest  which  occur 
within  the  community. 

The  caste  or  jati  is  theoretically  an  extension  of  the  kin  group, 


34o  CONCLUSION 

since  its  members  are  supposed  to  be  descended  from  a  common  an- 
cestor. Their  kin  relationship  is,  however,  sufficiently  remote  that  it 
assumes  little  practical  significance  beyond  that  basic  to  caste  itself, 
namely  the  ritual  and  social  equivalence  of  its  members.  Pahari  caste 
is  the  hereditary,  endogamous  unit,  ranked  with  regard  to  other  such 
units  in  terms  of  ritual  and  social  status.  It  is  associated  with  a  tradi- 
tional occupation  or  range  of  occupations.  Caste  is  significant  in  its 
regulation  of  marriage  and  other  social  and  ritual  contacts,  in  its  in- 
fluence on  the  religious  and  economic  activities  of  its  members,  and 
as  an  effective  identification  group  for  its  members.  It  is  an  important 
tie  which  extends  throughout  the  immediate  culture  area  across  com- 
munity boundaries  and  transcends  community  loyalties. 

The  village  community  is  made  up  of  people  identified  with  a  par- 
ticular nucleated  settlement  area  surrounded  by  agricultural  lands 
cultivated  primarily  by  its  high-caste  residents.  The  village  cannot  be 
understood  without  reference  to  its  extensions  in  surrounding  villages, 
especially  those  which  can  be  reached  in  half  a  day  and  with  which 
its  members  have  most  of  their  marriage  and  other  extravillage  social, 
religious,  and  economic  ties.  However  in  most  circumstances  the  village 
is  a  more  important  identification  group  than  is  the  larger  locality. 
People  feel  loyalty  to  it,  keep  its  secrets,  and  rally  to  its  support  when 
confronted  by  outsiders.  It  is  the  place  where  property  is  held,  where  a 
living  can  be  made,  where  one's  primary  emotional  attachments  are 
focused,  where  one  feels  secure  at  times  of  crisis  and  happy  at  times 
of  rejoicing.  Disputes  among  villagers  are  most  often  resolved  within 
the  community,  usually  by  high-caste  pressure  or  arbitration.  Trails, 
water  supply,  and  uncultivated  lands  are  held  by  the  village  in  com- 
mon. It  functions  as  an  entity  in  the  worship  of  village  gods,  its  unity 
and  identity  becoming  especially  explicit  in  the  important  village- 
protection  ceremony. 

Interaction  among  villagers  is  far  more  frequent  than  their  inter- 
action with  members  of  other  villages,  except  for  villagers  who  live 
elsewhere  but  still  identify  with  the  village.  The  status  of  nonresident 
villagers,  who  retain  their  traditional  village  affiliation  although  they 
live  in  outlying  dwellings  where  they  may  interact  more  frequently 
with  members  of  other  villages  than  with  members  of  their  own  village, 
is  one  of  the  contrasts  between  hill  villages  and  those  of  the  plains. 
Often  nonresident  hill  villagers  represent  the  first  step  toward  creation 
of  a  new  village.  They  usually  retain  their  original  village  identifica- 
tion as  long  as  they  belong  to  joint  families  which  own  a  dwelling  in 
that  village. 

An  individual's  identification  and  commitment  is  first  and  always 


CONCLUSION 


341 


with  his  local  kin  groups.  It  is  not  so  easy  to  determine  precedence 
in  more  distant  ties  within  the  caste  and  in  cross-caste  ties  in  the 
community.  The  individual  is  closely  identified  with,  and  committed 
to,  both.  In  disputes  which  test  these  loyalties  he  usually  takes  the 
side  of  his  caste  over  that  of  his  village,  but  such  situations  are  rare. 
When  there  is  no  such  conflict  of  loyalties,  intercaste  disputes  find 
him  siding  with  his  caste,  and  intervillage  disputes  find  him  siding  with 
his  village.  Village  affiliation  can  be  changed,  though  not  easily,  while 
caste  affiliation  is  inherited  and  unalterable.  If  a  person  emigrates  from 
his  village  he  may  seek  new  village  affiliation,  although  his  village  of 
origin  will  not  be  forgotten.  He  cannot  seek  new  caste  affiliation.  He 
establishes  himself  among  members  of  his  own  caste  in  his  new  en- 
vironment. Therefore,  community  ties,  though  strong,  are  less  stable 
than,  and  in  certain  respects  secondary  to,  caste  ties. 


2J  Primary  orientation 
Secondary  orientation 
Tertiary  orientation 


1.  Kin  groups 

a.  Household 

b.  Lineage  (minimal  and  maximal) 

c.  Sib 

d.  Kindred 

2.  Caste  as  named  group 

3.  Local  community 

4.  Other  sub-culture  areas 


Fig.  7.  Kin,  caste,  and  community  orientations. 


The  relationship  of  these  three  levels  of  orientation  for  the  in- 
dividual— kin,  caste,  and  community — can  best  be  viewed  in  terms  of 
the  area  in  which  they  coincide.  A  portion  of  the  diagram  of  "levels 
of  identification  and  interaction"  (fig.  6)  can  be  adapted  as  a  sche- 
matic way  of  looking  at  the  relationships.  It  is  intended  to  suggest 
reality  rather  than  to  define  it  precisely.  Where  kin,  caste,  and  com- 
munity ties  all  function  at  once  to  tie  individuals  to  one  another, 
we  find  the  area  of  the  individual's  fundamental  or  primary  identifi- 


342  CONCLUSION 

cation  (diagonally  hatched  portion  of  figure  7).  Where  two  of  the  three 
coincide,  there  is  less  intense  or  secondary  identification  (crosshatched 
portion  of  the  figure).  Where  only  one  of  these  ties  is  present,  there 
is  a  tertiary  level  of  identification.  Of  course,  kinship  ties  always  occur 
within  the  caste,  a  fact  which  assures  the  local  kin  group  of  its  pre- 
eminent place  in  the  orientation  of  the  individual.  In  other  words, 
kinfolk  who  live  in  the  same  village  identify  most  closely  with  one 
another.  Other  things  being  equal,  as  they  rarely  are,  kinfolk  who 
reside  in  other  villages  and  non-kin  caste-fellows  who  reside  in  the  same 
village  are  of  secondary  immediacy  in  the  orientation  of  the  individual. 
Non-kin  caste-fellows  of  other  villages  and  local  villagers  of  other  castes 
are  of  tertiary  immediacy  in  the  orientation  of  the  individual. 

These  statements  are  applicable  only  within  the  familiar  area  of 
marriage  relationships  around  the  village,  that  is,  Bhatbair  and  vicin- 
ity. To  go  beyond  the  immediate  culture  area  is  to  go  beyond  the 
familiar  world  of  villagers  and  hence  to  bring  in  factors  of  strangeness 
and  uncertainty.  Thus,  a  caste-fellow  from  another  area  is  not  com- 
parable to  a  resident  of  Bhatbair  in  the  minds  of  the  people  of  Bhat- 
bair. He  is  outside  the  marriage  network.  Here  degrees  of  difference 
are  crucial.  A  resident  of  a  neighboring  area  is  more  easily  appraised 
and  is  more  likely  to  be  acceptable  in  a  marriage  arrangement  than 
one  of  a  more  distant  and  more  different  area.  Any  speaker  of  the 
Central  Pahari  dialect  can  be  fitted  into  the  system  more  easily  than 
can  speakers  of  Western  and  Eastern  Pahari,  while  any  Pahari  is 
less  foreign  than  a  non-Pahari.  A  fourth  level  of  identification  might 
therefore  be  defined  as  non-kin,  noncaste,  noncommunity  members 
who  are  of  the  same  subcultural  area. 

The  status  of  the  stranger  emphasizes  the  relatively  closed  nature 
of  Sirkanda  society.  Ties  of  kinship,  caste,  and  community  are  crucial. 
If  a  person  has  such  ties  in  the  culture  area  he  can  be  incorporated 
into  the  social  system.  If  not,  he  is  an  outsider  and  a  stranger.  Since 
kin  and  caste  ties  cannot  be  acquired,  the  only  hope  of  acceptance  an 
outsider  has  (shopkeeper,  schoolteacher,  village  level  worker,  servant) 
is  through  community  affiliation,  and  this  comes  only  after  continuous 
residence  and  interaction  with  villagers.  The  measure  of  acceptance 
granted  the  anthropologist  and  his  interpreter  came  after  some  time, 
on  the  basis  of  residence  in  Sirkanda  and  interaction  with  its  mem- 
bers. Redfield  (1957,  pp.  33  f.)  says  that  "institutionalized  forms  for 
admitting  strangers"  are  characteristic  of  peasant  communities,  re- 
sulting from  the  fact  that  such  communities  are  dependent  upon  cities 
and  therefore  must  admit  representatives  of  necessary  urban  institu- 
tions into  their  midst.  Some  of  these  representatives  have  to  reside 


conclusion  343 

in  the  village  for  extended  periods,  and  the  peasant  society  is  prepared 
to  allow  them  to  do  so.  Redfield  points  out  that  such  aliens  do  not 
participate  fully  in  village  life  (indeed  they  would  not  be  allowed  to 
in  Sirkanda),  and  cannot  become  village  members.  Like  the  shop- 
keeper and  governmental  employees  in  Sirkanda,  they  become  in- 
stead "resident  strangers,"  admitted  upon  sufferance  of  villagers  to 
play  their  limited  roles. 

In  this  research  attention  has  been  called  to  the  confusion  which 
often  arises  between  caste  conceived  of  as  an  abstract,  idealized  system 
and  caste  viewed  as  behavior — as  attitudes  expressed  by  people  and  as 
interaction  among  people  (cf.  Berreman,  1960a).  Both  are  important 
for  an  understanding  of  the  system,  but  their  differences  and  spheres 
of  relevance  have  to  be  kept  clear  in  the  observer's  mind  if  accurate 
interpretations  are  to  result. 

While  this  point  has  been  made  with  special  reference  to  caste,  a 
similar  point  is  pertinent  to  discussions  of  kin  group,  community,  and 
extracommunity  organization  and  interaction.  What  people  say  should 
be  done  is  often  quite  different  from  what  is  done  and  enforced  within 
and  among  these  groups.  Some  of  the  confusion  about  the  "great" 
and  "little"  religious  traditions  in  India,  with  the  frequent  implication 
that  these  are  correlated  with  national  and  local  spread,  respectively, 
is  attributable  in  large  part  to  failure  to  make  the  appropriate  distinc- 
tions in  observation  and  analysis  or  to  make  explicit  the  context  in 
which  reported  religious  attitudes  and  behavior  correspond  to  the  facts 
of  daily  life.  Similar  confusion  is  evident  in  much  of  the  comment 
concerning  the  effectiveness,  on  the  community  level,  of  programs  of 
community  development  and  local  self-government.  Speculation  about 
the  decline,  in  some  areas,  of  the  village  and  of  the  extended  family 
as  effective  social  and  economic  units  may  also  be  biased  by  confusion 
on  these  points.  Behavior,  observed  and  analyzed  in  context,  is  neces- 
sary information  upon  which  to  base  conclusions  about  culture  and 
social  structure. 

This  does  not  mean  that  such  factors  as  private  attitudes  and,  at 
the  other  extreme,  great  traditions,  should  be  overlooked.  These  are 
important  aspects  of  reality  whose  existence  and  relevance  to  those  who 
hold  them  are  detectable  only  through  behavior,  often  verbal  or  other 
symbolic  behavior.  To  overlook  such  factors  would  be  to  overlook  an 
aspect  of  culture  as  important  as  any  other.  However,  they  should 
be  analyzed  in  terms  of  their  relationship  to  other  types  of  behavior. 
When  information  is  obtained  from  secondary  sources  or  literary 
sources,  care  has  to  be  taken  to  obtain  the  behavioral  context  in  which 
it  functions.  Caution  is  especially  necessary  when,  as  in  matters  of  caste 


344  CONCLUSION 

in  India,  certain  groups  have  strong  vested  interests  in  adhering  to 
particular  and  often  limited  views  of  reality,  particularly  before  an 
audience  of  outsiders. 

The  Pahari  Culture  Area:  Sources  and  Affinities 

In  comparisons  and  generalizations  the  Himalayan  foothills  from 
Kashmir  across  North  India  and  Nepal  have  here  been  referred  to  as 
a  "culture  area."  In  some  contexts  smaller  segments  of  this  area  as, 
for  example,  the  region  occupied  by  Central  Pahari-speaking  peoples 
(roughly  between  the  Jumna  and  Kali  rivers),  Tehri  Garhwal,  or  even 
Bhatbair  and  vicinity  have  been  referred  to  as  culture  areas.  This  is 
a  matter  of  level  of  generalization,  since  a  culture  area  is  simply  an 
area  within  which  the  cultures  are  similar  to  one  another  and  distinc- 
tive relative  to  cultures  outside  that  area.  Sirkanda  residents  could  be 
legitimately  described  as  representatives  of  any  or  all  of  the  following 
culture  areas:  India,  North  India,  Pahari,  Central  Pahari,  Garhwal, 
Tehri  Garhwal,  Bhatbair  and  vicinity.  Other  areas  could  be  delimited, 
including  some  that  would  crosscut  these.  For  present  purposes  the 
Pahari  culture  area,  an  unusually  distinct  and  sharply  defined  one, 
will  be  discussed. 

A  brief  description  of  this  culture  area  which  has  been  given  else- 
where can  be  repeated  here  to  indicate  the  nature  of  Pahari  culture: 

The  distinctiveness  of  the  Paharis  as  a  group  is  suggested  by  the  fact  that 
they  share  a  common  and  distinctive  linguistic  stock.  They  also  share  a  num- 
ber of  other  cultural  features  which  distinguish  them  from  the  rest  of  the 
North  Indian  culture  area  and  specifically  from  the  plains-dwellers  adjacent 
to  them.  These  features,  like  their  language,  are  not  entirely  unique  or  di- 
vorced from  those  of  the  rest  of  North  India,  but  are  divergent  forms  grounded 
in  a  common  heritage.  In  emphasizing  differences,  care  must  be  taken  not  to 
ignore  the  numerous  and  basic  similarities  common  to  Paharis  and  other 
North  Indians.  Differences  are,  however,  the  primary  subject  of  this  analysis. 
Among  distinguishing  Pahari  characteristics  are: 

(1)  A  somewhat  distinctive  caste  structure  wherein  there  is  a  major  division 
between  the  dominant  high  or  twice-born  castes  ("big  castes"  in  local  par- 
lance), made  up  of  Brahmins  and  Rajputs,  and  the  "untouchable"  (achut) 
low  or  "small"  castes.  The  former  are  the  land-owning  agriculturalists;  the 
latter  comprise  all  of  the  service  castes  (blacksmiths,  carpenters,  weavers, 
musicians,  shoemakers,  and  others),  collectively  termed  Dom,  and  make  up 
only  about  10  percent  of  the  population  in  any  area.  While  there  is  hierarchi- 
cal caste  ranking  within  each  of  these  two  major  categories,  it  is  of  significance 
primarily  to  those  within  that  category.  From  across  the  high-low  caste  pollu- 
tion barrier,  it  appears  insignificant.  The  range  of  castes  found  in  the  hills  is 


conclusion  345 

smaller  than  in  the  plains.  Conspicuous  by  their  absence  are  indigenous 
Vaisya  (merchants)  and  Sudra  (clean  caste  artisans).  On  the  other  hand, 
occupational  variability  within  castes  is  considerable  in  the  hills.  .  .  . 

(2)  A  number  of  rules  pertaining  to  marriage  which  would  be  unacceptable 
to  many  plains  groups  and  especially  to  those  of  high  caste.  These  include 
bride-price  marriage  with  no  necessity  for  a  Sanskritic  marriage  ceremony, 
polyandry  in  some  areas,  levirate,  divorce  by  mutual  consent,  remarriage  of 
widows  and  divorcees,  toleration  of  intercaste  marriage  within  the  high-  or 
low-caste  group.  There  is  also  a  good  deal  of  postmarital  sexual  freedom  and 
sanctioned  relations  of  brothers  with  one  another's  wives.  Marriage  is  uni- 
versally prohibited  only  in  own  and  mother's  clan  [that  is,  sib],  and  village 
exogamy  is  not  everywhere  the  rule. 

(3)  No  seclusion  of  women  and  freer  participation  of  women  in  most 
aspects  of  life  than  on  the  plains,  including  their  participation  in  singing 
and  dancing  at  festivals.  Relatively  free  informal  contact  between  the  sexes 
is  usual. 

(4)  A  number  of  religious  and  ritual  features  such  as  absence  of  the  require- 
ment for  a  Sanskritic  marriage  ceremony  and  absence  of  the  requirement  for 
a  sacred  thread  ceremony  for  high-caste  boys,  though  such  ceremonies  are 
coming  rapidly  into  vogue  in  some  areas.  Distinctive  Pahari  marriage  and 
death  ceremonies  are  performed.  There  is  a  great  reliance  upon  mediums  and 
diviners  and  in  some  areas  the  Brahmin  priest  is  relatively  less  important 
than  on  the  plains.  Frequent  and  elaborate  ritual  purification  and  other 
religiously  motivated  acts  common  on  the  plains  are  less  widespread  in  the 
hills.  There  are  many  distinctively  Pahari  religious  beliefs  and  forms  of  wor- 
ship. Animal  sacrifice  is  a  part  of  most  Pahari  ceremonies,  and  buffalo 
sacrifice  is  found  in  some  areas.  Paharis  are  widely  known  for  their  devotion  to 
the  Pandavas  of  Mahabharata  fame  and  to  Siva.  The  unique  and  spectacular 
rope-sliding  ceremony  is  performed  in  honor  of  the  latter.  .  .  . 

(5)  Distinctive  folklore,  songs,  dances  and  festivals. 

(6)  Consumption  of  meat  and  liquor  by  all  castes. 

(7)  Greater  flexibility  of  intercaste  relations  and  freer  intercaste  interac- 
tion than  on  the  plains.  The  caste  hierarchy  is  important  and  caste  status 
differences  are  actively  enforced,  but  the  rules  allow  considerably  more  con- 
tact and  informal  interaction  than  is  usual  in  India. 

(8)  In  addition  to  a  nucleated  settlement  adjacent  to  a  concentration  of 
village  lands  there  are  temporary-cum-permanent  dwellings  on  widely  scat- 
tered and  often  distant  agricultural  and  grazing  lands.  These  are  thought  of 
as  part  of  the  village  even  when  other  villages  intervene. 

(g)  Terrace  agriculture  with  primary  dependence  on  millets,  wheat,  and 
barley.  Soil  productivity  is  maintained  by  systematic  fertilization,  crop  rota- 
tion, and  fallowing.  Water  is  scarce  but  wherever  possible  is  used  for  irrigated 
rice  cultivation. 

(10)  Dwellings  of  stone  and  timbers,  often  with  slate  roofs.  Distinctive  archi- 
tecture of  two  stories  with  lower  floor  as  barn  and  upper  floor  as  living  area, 
often  with  large  open  veranda  or  porch  at  the  upper  level. 


346  CONCLUSION 

(11)  A  number  of  artifacts  including  lathe-turned  wooden  utensils,  elabo- 
rately carved  wooden  porch  columns,  lintels,  windows,  etc.;  virtual  absence  of 
pottery. 

(12)  Distinctive  women's  dress  and  ornamentation,  including  full  skirt, 
fitted  jacket,  and  several  types  of  gold  and  silver  jewelry.  Men's  dress  is  not 
so  distinctive  and  has  rapidly  become  like  that  of  men  of  the  plains,  but  now 
includes  a  black  or  colored  cap,  a  woolen  blanket,  and  a  cane  as  typical 
Pahari  accoutrements. 

This  list  is  suggestive  rather  than  exhaustive.  Some  items  on  it  may  not  be 
as  widespread  in  the  hills  as  others,  especially  in  the  area  east  of  Garhwal, 
for  which  there  is  little  information.  It  serves  to  make  the  point,  however, 
that  this  can  for  some  purposes  be  considered  a  distinct  culture  area  or 
subarea  within  the  greater  North  Indian  area.  In  view  of  its  geographical 
and  ecological  isolation,  its  distinctiveness  is  not  surprising;  in  view  of  its 
common  heritage  with  the  rest  of  North  India,  its  basic  similarity  thereto 
is  only  what  would  be  expected.  (Berreman,  1960b,  pp.  775-778) 

Several  explanations  for  these  and  other  distinctive  Pahari  traits 
have  been  offered  by  the  people  themselves  and  by  various  observers. 
Perhaps  the  most  frequent  explanation  is  an  environmental  one.  A 
villager  commented: 

We  can't  observe  all  of  those  rules  that  plains  people  do.  Our  women 
have  to  work,  they  can't  bother  with  being  secluded  [purdah]  or  being  out  of 
circulation  when  they  menstruate  or  for  a  long  time  after  they  give  birth. 
We  haven't  enough  water  nor  enough  time  to  waste  bathing  all  of  the  time 
like  some  plains  people  do.  If  a  Brahmin  here  practiced  all  the  observances 
a  plains  Brahmin  does,  his  family  would  starve. 

Some  writers  have  set  forth  very  explicit,  and  often  curious  en- 
vironmentally deterministic,  explanations.  Raturi  (1928,  p.  207)  says 
that  "it  is  natural  to  eat  meat  and  drink  wine  and  wear  woolen  clothes 
to  keep  warm  in  cold  countries,"  and  Majumdar  (1944,  p.  128)  asserts 
that  "in  cold  climates  dances  form  the  most  important  form  of 
recreation." 

Some  traits  have  been  explained  in  terms  of  economics.  Bahadur 
(1916,  p.  135)  attributes  polygyny  to  the  need  for  wives  as  agricultural 
laborers,  and  many  villagers  also  give  this  explanation.  Walton  (1911a, 
p.  88)  attributes  fraternal  polyandry,  where  it  occurs,  to  pressure  on 
the  land  and  a  desire  to  maintain  family  lands  intact.  Majumdar  (1944, 
p.  127)  mentions  the  expense  of  a  woman's  jewelry  as  contributing  to 
polyandry.  Several  writers  have  attributed  polygamy  in  this  area  to 
disparity  in  proportions  of  the  sexes  (Berreman,  1962a). 

A  frequently  suggested  source  of  the  unique  configuration  of  cus- 
toms found  in  this  hill  area  is  in  the  assumed  cultural  origins  of  the 


conclusion  347 

hill  people.  They  are  often  pictured  as  modern  survivals  of  an  earlier 
era.  Briffault  (1927,  p.  671)  says  that  "The  highland  regions  of  the 
Himalaya  are  but  a  residual  cultural  island  which  preserves  social 
customs  that  had  once  a  far  more  extensive  distribution.  The  in- 
stitutions which  are  found  surviving  there  were  once  common  through- 
out the  greater  part  of  Central  Asia."  Another  author  has  called  them 
"a  fossil  of  the  age  of  Mahabharata"  (Munshi,  1955,  p.  i).  Statements 
such  as  the  latter  are  based  on  similarities  between  certain  practices 
common  in  the  area  (polyandry,  meat-eating,  freedom  of  women,  lack 
of  caste  rigidity)  and  practices  recorded  in  classic  texts  of  Hinduism. 
As  has  been  pointed  out  in  chapter  1,  it  is  frequently  asserted  that 
the  high-caste  Khasiyas  represent  a  population  of  Indo-Aryan  speak- 
ing invaders  who  came  into  this  area  from  the  northwest,  either  directly 
or  via  Rajasthan.  These  people  presumably  conquered  or  absorbed 
an  indigenous  non-Aryan  population  ancestral  to  present-day  Doms. 
It  is  often  assumed  that  the  Indo-Aryans  were  originally  of  the  pure 
high-caste  stock  both  genetically  and  culturally,  but  that  they  have 
since  degenerated  as  a  result  of  isolation  or  adoption  of  the  practices 
of  the  people  they  conquered.  Grierson  (1916,  p.  7)  states  that  the 
Khasiyas  ".  .  .  were  looked  upon  [by  the  most  ancient  Indian  au- 
thorities] as  Kshatriyas  of  Aryan  origin.  .  .  .  They  were  considered 
to  have  lost  their  claim  to  consideration  as  Aryans,  and  to  have  become 
.  .  .  barbarians  due  to  their  non-observance  of  the  rules  of  eating  and 
drinking  observed  by  the  Sanskritic  peoples  of  India." 

The  Himalayan  area  may  once  have  been  the  home  of  the  ancestors 
of  today's  plains  Hindus.  Basham  states  that  "It  has  been  reasonably 
suggested  that  the  main  line  of  Aryan  penetration  was  not  down  the 
[Ganges]  river,  the  banks  of  which  were  then  probably  thick  swampy 
jungle,  but  along  the  Himalayan  foothills"  (Basham,  1953,  p.  41). 
"While  the  Aryans  had  by  now  [later  Vedic  period,  ca.  700  B.C.] 
expanded  far  into  India  their  old  home  in  the  Panjab  and  the  North- 
West  was  practically  forgotten.  Later  Vedic  literature  mentions  it 
rarely,  and  then  usually  with  disparagement  and  contempt,  as  an 
impure  land  where  the  Vedic  sacraments  are  not  performed.  It  may 
have  been  once  more  invaded  by  Indo-Iranian  tribes  who  did  not 
follow  the  orthodox  rites"  (ibid.). 

Majumdar  believes  that  the  social  and  religious  life  of  this  culture 
area  is  a  result  of  mixture  of  the  cultural  traditions  of  indigenes  and 
the  Indo-Aryan  invaders,  and  even  claims  to  find  evidence  that  the 
Doms  were  "matriarchal"  and  the  Khasiyas  "patriarchal."  He  assigns 
particular  distinctive  Pahari  traits  such  as  "the  double  standard  of 
morality  practiced  by  women"  (in  their  home  villages  as  contrasted 


348  CONCLUSION 

to  those  of  their  husbands)  to  the  influence  of  alleged  matriarchal  Dom 
culture  (Majumdar,  1944,  pp.  173  £.). 

Saksena  (1955,  p.  30)  notes  that  "it  has  been  suggested  by  Mayne 
that  the  Indo-Aryans  adopted  their  polyandrous  customs  from  the 
aborigines  or  from  a  neighboring  polyandrous  people."  Meat-eating, 
religious  unorthodoxy  including  worship  of  household  and  village 
gods,  and  even  worship  of  the  god  Shiva,  have  been  attributed  by  some 
writers  to  the  "aboriginal"  culture.  Saksena  disagrees,  on  grounds  that 
"when  a  superior  culture  imposes  itself  over  an  inferior  culture,  it 
is  the  latter  which  is  affected  more"  (Saksena,  1955,  p.  31).  Instead, 
following  Briffault,  he  attributes  polyandry  as  well  as  most  distinctive 
contemporary  practices  to  survivals  of  the  common  Indo-Aryan  cul- 
tural origin  of  the  high-caste  people. 

The  unique  Pahari  cultural  configuration  can  also  be  attributed  in 
part  to  the  distinctive  combination  of  cultural  contacts  to  which  the 
area  has  been  subject  since  the  period  of  settlement  of  Indo-Aryan 
speaking  peoples  there. 

The  Pahari  area,  a  long,  narrow  strip  following  the  southern  face 
of  the  Himalayas,  comprises  the  northernmost  border  of  the  Indian 
and  North  Indian  culture  areas,  meeting  throughout  its  length  the 
southern  edge  of  the  Tibetan  culture  area.  Off  the  western  end  of  the 
Pahari  area  lies  the  Southwest  Asian  area — the  Indus  valley  and 
Afghanistan  (cf.  Bacon,  1946).  To  the  east  the  Pahari  area  seems  to 
terminate  in  contact  with  Tibetans,  Tibeto-Burman,  and  perhaps 
other  "tribal"  peoples  (cf.  Iijima,  i960),  and  North  Indian  plains 
groups.  Paharis  are  to  some  extent  physically  isolated  from  these  other 
areas  and  groups.  They  are  separated  from  peoples  of  the  Indo- 
Gangetic  plain  by  the  fact  that  they  occupy  rugged  hills  bordered  by 
a  band  of  talus  slopes,  swamps,  and  jungles.  They  are  separated  from 
the  Tibetan  plateau  by  the  high  Himalayas,  and  from  Afghanistan 
by  the  mountains  of  the  old  Northwest  Frontier  Province.  More  im- 
portant in  separating  Paharis  from  adjacent  peoples  have  been  cultural 
and  ecological  factors.  Kawakita  (1957,  1961)  and  Iijima  (1961)  have 
commented  in  some  detail  on  ecological  zones  and  their  ethnic  cor- 
relates in  the  Nepal  Himalaya.  Such  barriers  have  contributed  to 
Pahari  isolation,  but  they  have  not  proved  insuperable. 

The  most  intensive  outside  contact  in  Garhwal  has  been  with  the 
people  of  the  plains  of  North  India,  who  share  historical  ties  with 
Paharis  and  are  of  the  same  racial,  cultural,  and  linguistic  stock. 
People  from  North  India — the  Gangetic  plain,  the  Punjab,  and 
Rajasthan — have  come  to  the  Pahari  area  frequently  on  pilgrimages, 
to  trade,  to  seek  refuge  from  the  tribulations  of  their  native  areas,  or 


conclusion  349 

to  find  new  lands  and  subjects.  Thus,  the  Paharis  have  felt  directly 
or  indirectly  the  effects  of  most  of  the  important  invasions  and  other 
upheavals  of  North  India.  Occasionally  South  Indians  have  come,  espe- 
cially on  pilgrimage,  and  a  few  important  temples  in  the  mountains 
are  said  to  have  South  Indian  priests. 

Contact  with  the  Southwest  Asian  area  has  been  extremely  limited  in 
contemporary  times  because  of  the  short  common  boundary,  the  great 
distances,  intervening  mountains  and  desert,  and  political  and  cultural 
factors.  However,  historically  this  was  very  likely  a  region  inhabited 
at  least  for  a  time  by  the  Indo-Aryan  populations  which  ultimately 
extended  over  all  of  North  India  including  the  Himalayan  hills,  and 
which  are  presumed  to  have  been  the  source  of  much  of  today's 
Indian  culture.  The  Paharis  share  this  cultural  tradition.  Contact  with 
Kashmiris,  in  the  northwest,  continues  today  as  an  indirect  Southwest 
Asian  contact. 

Observers  have  frequently  attributed  Pahari  polyandry  to  contacts 
with  polyandrous  Tibetans.  This  is  an  unlikely  source  in  view  of  the 
distribution  and  functioning  of  Pahari  polyandry.  There  has  been, 
however,  considerable  contact  and  mutual  influence  between  the  two 
cultures.  There  are  numerous  regular  trade  routes  over  the  Hima- 
layas into  Tibet  including  at  least  one  (Nilang)  in  Tehri  Garhwal. 
Trade  is  carried  on  in  both  directions.  Moreover,  there  are  peoples 
(the  Bhotiyas)  living  in  the  higher  Indian  Himalayas,  whose  cultural 
affinities  are  with  Tibet  (cf.  Kawakita,  1957,  1961;  Iijima,  1961;  Pant, 
1935;  Srivastava,  1958).  The  Bhotiyas  are  in  frequent  contact  with 
adjacent  Paharis,  and  they  come  each  winter  to  trade  and  to  pasture 
goats  and  sheep  in  Pahari  areas.  In  fact,  as  was  noted  in  chapter  1,  the 
traditional  name  of  the  hill  area  in  which  this  study  was  carried 
out,  Bhatbair,  means  "sheep  den,"  in  reference  to  its  yearly  use  by 
Bhotiya  shepherds.  Pahari  culture  has  been  influenced  by  contacts 
with  Bhotiyas,  especially  in  Almora  District.  As  a  rule  in  India, 
Bhotiyas  seem  to  show  more  markedly  than  Paharis  a  cultural  amalgam 
or  syncretism  brought  about  by  a  combination  of  Tibetan  affinities 
and  contacts  and  close  association  with  Paharis  of  the  Indian  culture 
area.  In  the  hill  area  of  Nepal  (the  Eastern  Pahari-speaking  region) 
Tibetan  influence  has  evidently  been  considerably  stronger  than  it  has 
in  most  of  the  Indian  Himalayas  and  is  evidenced  today  in  the  greater 
numbers  of  people  and  cultural  traits  of  Tibetan  affinities  there  (cf. 
Kawakita,  1957,  1961;  Iijima,  1961). 

The  Pahari  area  is,  therefore,  a  relatively  isolated  one  whose  resi- 
dents share  common  origins,  history,  contacts,  and  environment  and 
who  interact  with  one  another  more  than  with  outsiders.  They  have 


350  CONCLUSION 

numerous  contacts  with  the  residents  of  the  adjacent  North  Indian 
plains  area,  with  whom  they  share  origins,  much  history,  and  therefore 
much  culture.  A  significant  number  of  Paharis  are  relatively  recent 
immigrants  from  the  plains.  With  the  Tibetan  area  Paharis  have  long 
had  occasional  contact.  They  have  had  historical  ties  and  rare  con- 
tacts with  the  Southwest  Asian  culture  area  as  well.  No  attempt  can 
be  made  here  to  outline  cultural  element  distributions  to  enumerate 
the  debts  Pahari  culture  owes  to  these  other  areas.  Comparative  data 
are  not  available  and  their  collection  was  beyond  the  scope  of  this 
research,  but  it  is  obvious  that  Pahari  culture  owes  them  much  and 
has  contributed  to  them  as  well. 

Origins,  outside  contacts,  cultural  amalgamation,  and  environmental 
and  economic  adaptation  are  therefore  all  relevant  to  an  explanation 
of  the  distinctive  Pahari  culture.  In  conjunction  with  such  explanatory 
factors,  the  fact  of  isolation  and  the  concept  of  cultural  drift  are  use- 
ful in  throwing  light  on  this  subject.  «, 

All  cultures  change  through  time  as  a  result  of  the  transmission, 
among  those  who  carry  them,  of  the  results  of  experience — cultural 
variants,  alternatives,  and  additions  and  deletions,  derived  from  new 
conditions,  relationships,  contacts,  and  insights.  Common  experience 
resulting  from  common  environment  and  from  frequent,  intensive 
interaction  results  in  common  culture.  However,  when  two  or  more 
groups  of  people  become  isolated  so  that  social  interaction  and  there- 
fore cultural  transmission  is  decreased  or  cut  off  between  them,  they 
gradually  accumulate  differential  experience  and  consequently  their 
cultures  change  in  divergent  ways.  This  cultural  drift  accounts  in 
large  part  for  the  differences  between  plains  and  Pahari  cultures  (Berre- 
man,  1960b).  Paharis  have  had  more  frequent  and  intensive  contacts 
with  one  another  than  with  peoples  of  the  plains  or  of  other  cul- 
ture areas.  For  example,  marriage  networks  apparently  interconnect 
throughout  the  Pahari  area,  but  they  end  abruptly  at  the  plains 
boundary.  Despite  their  probable  common  origin,  Paharis  and  plains 
people  have  long  been  separated  by  topographical  and  sociocultural 
barriers,  and  subjected  to  different  contacts  and  environments.  As  a 
result  they  are  culturally  distinct.  Language,  social  organization,  econ- 
omy, religion,  and  material  culture  all  reflect  their  distinctiveness. 

Degree  of  mutual  isolation  also  explains  contrasts  between  the  de- 
gree of  cultural  variability  found  among  social  groups  in  the  hills 
and  that  in  the  plains.  Although  Pahari  culture  displays  relatively 
consistent  differences  when  contrasted  with  plains  culture,  and  in 
that  context  appears  to  be  relatively  homogeneous,  small  Pahari 
localities  and  regions  show  a  high  degree  of  cultural  difference  from 


CONCLUSION  351 

one  another.  This  variability  is  evidently  greater  over  shorter  dis- 
tances than  in  the  plains,  just  as  Pahari  marriage  networks  are  smaller. 
This  is  largely  a  result  of  greater  isolation  between  Pahari  localities 
with  consequent  divergent  or  differential  culture  change,  that  is, 
cultural  drift.  Because  of  the  terrain,  Pahari  settled  areas  are  relatively 
inaccessible  to  one  another.  A  fertile  valley  or  gently  sloping  ridge 
may  have  a  fairly  dense  population  but  may  be  a  difficult  journey  from 
another  such  settled  locality.  It  is  such  localities  which  differ  culturally 
so  conspicuously  from  one  another.  Rosser  (1955)  describes  an  extreme 
example  of  an  isolated  and  culturally  distinct  Pahari  locality. 

Caste  groups  within  a  Pahari  locality  show  notably  less  cultural 
difference  from  one  another  than  do  castes  of  the  plains — probably 
also  a  function  of  isolation.  Plains  castes  are  socially  more  isolated 
from  one  another  than  are  those  of  the  hills  and  so  have  had  an 
opportunity  to  become  or  remain  culturally  more  distinct  than  if 
they  had  been  in  frequent,  intensive,  and  extensive  contact  as  are 
hill  castes.  On  the  plains,  most  intensive  contacts  are  among  caste- 
fellows,  often  across  local  boundaries.  In  the  hills,  most  intensive 
contacts  are  within  the  locality,  often  across  caste  boundaries  (Berre- 
man,  1960b). 

Functional  Implications  of  Plains-Pahari  Contrasts 

Most  generalizations  about  North  Indian  society  and  culture  in 
the  anthropological  literature  are  in  reality  generalizations  about  the 
Indo-Gangetic  plain.  They  ignore  the  Himalayan  area  either  through 
lack  of  information  or  an  impression  that  Paharis  are  unimportant 
marginals  or  possibly  tribal  peoples.  One  aim  of  the  present  research 
is  to  provide  a  basis  for  correcting  such  errors  or  oversights  and  to 
broaden  the  scope  of  available  information  about  Indian  village  life 
and  its  regional  variations  by  describing  a  Pahari  village  and  its  region. 

Distinctive  Pahari  characteristics  and  their  possible  sources  have 
been  pointed  out  above  and  contrasted  to  those  of  the  plains  of  North 
India.  In  conclusion,  it  is  appropriate  to  comment  on  the  functional 
implications  of  some  of  the  most  prominent  contrasts  between  these 
two  culture  areas. 

The  nature  of  the  Pahari  local  group — the  village — is  affected  by 
its  physical  environment.  Cultivable  areas  are  often  small  and 
scattered.  Travel  between  them  is  slow  and  difficult  as  compared  to 
that  in  the  plains.  As  a  consequence,  villages  are  small  and  isolated. 
They  have  an  inward-looking,  self-contained  character  as  compared 
to  plains  villages,  and  the  area  of  near  self-sufficiency  in  economic, 


352  CONCLUSION 

social,  and  ritual  matters  is  relatively  small.  Interaction  has  to  be 
within  local  or  nearby  groups  if  it  is  to  occur  at  all. 

In  many  Pahari  areas  there  has  always  been  more  potentially  cul- 
tivable land  available  than  could  be  put  into  cultivation  under  the 
rigorous  conditions  of  this  sparsely  populated  region.  Therefore, 
population  increase  has  proceeded  with  minimal  pressure  on  the  land. 
Since  much  usable  land  is  scattered  in  small  amounts,  a  system  of 
residence  in  field  houses  (chans)  has  developed.  As  a  consequence, 
population  increase  has  taken  place  without  significant  increase  in  the 
size  of  particular  villages.  New  settlements  have  arisen  instead.  The 
chans  may  also  have  enabled  growing  joint  families  to  remain  intact 
as  social,  economic,  and  ritual  units  by  permitting  them  to  divide  as 
residential  units,  thereby  reducing  interpersonal  frictions  which  lead 
to  dissolution  of  joint  families. 

The  small,  inward-looking  nature  of  the  Garhwali  village  is  reflected 
in  the  relations  among  social  units  within  it.  The  village  is  not  exog- 
amous.  All  members  of  the  locally  dominant  Rajput  caste  in  Sirkanda 
have  affinal  or  consanguineal  ties  with  one  another.  Marriage  net- 
works of  all  castes  are  small,  their  size  varying  inversely  with  the  popu- 
lation of  the  caste  in  the  surrounding  area.  Between  high  and  low 
castes  there  is  more  permissiveness  or  flexibility  in  rules  of  interaction 
than  on  the  plains,  so  that  within  the  village  they  interact  frequently 
and  intensively.  Minority  castes  have  to  interact  with  their  fellow 
villagers  of  other  castes  if  they  are  to  interact  at  all,  because  caste- 
fellows  are  few,  far,  and  difficult  of  access.  Permissiveness  of  interaction 
as  compared  to  plains  custom  does  not  indicate  decreased  importance 
of  the  pollution  barrier  or  ambiguity  as  to  where  it  lies  or  what  it 
means.  It  merely  indicates  that  there  are  different  behavioral  symbols 
of  status  in  the  hierarchy.  The  lines  are  drawn  as  sharply  as  in  the 
plains,  but  in  different  places  and  in  different  ways. 

Because  Paharis  have  relatively  little  interaction  with  distant  people, 
even  of  their  own  caste,  regional  variation  in  culture  is  a  prominent 
feature.  As  a  result  of  the  nature  of  interaction  between  high  and  low 
castes,  cultural  homogeneity  within  a  locality  is  great.  Everyone  knows 
everyone  else's  way  of  life,  beliefs,  and  secrets.  To  a  large  extent,  these 
are  common  to  all  groups  except  where  particular  behaviors  are  sym- 
bols of  status  differences  or  are  the  means  of  maintaining  advantages  for 
particular  groups  in  the  village.  Freedom  of  association,  including 
toleration  of  occasional  intermarriage  between  Rajputs  and  Brahmins, 
seems  to  indicate  a  genuinely  smaller  social  and  ritual  distance  at  this 
level  than  is  found  on  the  plains. 

Associated  with   permissiveness  of   intercaste  relations   is   a  great 


conclusion  353 

amount  of  flexibility  of  occupational  specialization  among  castes.  There 
are  few  castes  of  occupational  specialists,  and  few  individuals  in  these 
castes.  In  any  one  village  or  local  area,  certain  specialists  may  be  lack- 
ing, or  inaccessible.  It  is  therefore  important  to  have  artisans  who  can 
adopt  any  of  several  occupations,  and  even  to  have  high  castes  willing 
and  able  to  take  over  in  an  emergency.  The  flexibility  of  rules  of  caste 
behavior  makes  this  possible  without  jeopardizing  caste  status,  but  it 
has  the  effect  of  reducing  the  economic  security  of  artisans,  for  they 
have  little  in  the  way  of  effective  occupational  monopolies.  Conse- 
quently the  jajmani  system  of  traditional  exchange  of  goods  for  serv- 
ices is  less  rigid,  and  is  less  effective  from  the  artisans'  point  of  view, 
than  on  the  plains  (Berreman,  1962b). 

The  fact  that  villages  have  been  occupied  primarily  by  owner- 
cultivators  has  contributed  to  self-reliance  and  an  independent  attitude 
among  high-caste  Sirkanda  residents  quite  in  contrast  to  the  alleged 
ma-bapism,  or  dependence  upon  paternalistic  agents  of  outside  author- 
ity, reported  for  some  peoples  of  India.  Paharis  owe  allegiance  to  no 
landlord.  No  cultivator  in  the  locality  in  recent  times  has  been  master 
of  any  other.  No  landholder  is  free  of  arduous  agricultural  labor  in 
his  fields.  No  one  has  conveniences  or  luxuries  not  available  to  nearly 
everyone  else.  Pahari  agricultural  techniques,  such  as  fertilization  of 
fields  and  crop  rotation,  together  with  ample  land,  regular  rainfall, 
and  large  forest  areas  to  provide  fuel  and  fodder,  have  made  for  an 
economy  sufficient  to  consistently  meet  subsistence  needs.  Famine  is 
virtually  unknown.  People  work  hard,  but  economic  sufficiency  is  the 
result.  For  the  dominant  high  castes  this  means  a  kind  of  security  un- 
known to  many  cultivators  of  the  plains. 

Also  contributory  to  an  independence  of  spirit  in  and  around  Sir- 
kanda has  been  relative  isolation  from  outside  supervision  and  inter- 
vention. Sirkanda  people  seem  to  feel  less  restricted  than  many  plains 
people.  They  have  a  mild  kind  of  frontier  mentality  associated  with 
freedom  from  authority  and  freedom  from  absence  of  alternatives.  For 
high-caste  Paharis  there  has  always  been  more  land  for  the  taking  if 
one  could  muster  the  labor  to  prepare  and  cultivate  it.  Moreover,  one 
could  move  out  of  his  family's  house  and  out  of  the  village  to  a  new 
chan  location  if  he  wished.  If  worst  came  to  worst,  he  could  remove  to 
an  entirely  new  area,  as  did  those  who  settled  Sirkanda  over  300  years 
ago. 

Low-caste  people  are  acutely  aware  of  their  insecure  economic  po- 
sition and  of  high-caste  advantage.  They  feel  that  they  are  virtual 
puppets  of  the  agriculturists.  They  do  not  need  to  fear  starvation  as 
long  as  they  remain  in  the  good  graces  of  the  cultivating  high  castes. 


354  CONCLUSION 

What  they  fear  is  the  rather  erratic  bestowal  and  withdrawal  of  those 
good  graces.  Among  themselves  they  are  more  competitive  and  less 
cohesive  than  is  usual  among  equivalent  plains  castes.  They  must  often 
compete  for  clients  because  they  are  dependent  on  their  craftwork  for 
livelihood  and  there  are  others,  even  of  other  castes,  who  will  take 
their  place  if  the  opportunity  arises.  This  competition  varies  from  place 
to  place  and  time  to  time,  depending  upon  the  population  of  artisans 
in  a  particular  area. 

Because  of  their  isolation  from  caste-fellows  resulting  from  their 
small  numbers  and  the  isolation  of  villages,  low-caste  people  have  little 
opportunity  to  coordinate  their  activities  to  defend  their  interests. 
Perhaps,  in  view  of  factors  noted  above,  they  would  not  do  so  anyway. 
They  have  little  in  the  way  of  caste  government,  so  that  their  position 
relative  to  the  high  castes  is  especially  weak.  The  high  castes  have 
maintained  the  situation  by  serving  as  authoritarian  and  ideally  pa- 
ternalistic overseers  of  the  low  castes,  deciding  among  themselves  all 
matters  pertaining  to  low-caste  people,  both  internal  and  intercaste. 
Low  castes  are  controlled  by  being  kept  economically  dependent 
through  being  denied  the  opportunity  to  acquire  land  in  amounts 
sufficient  to  make  a  living.  All  castes  recognize  that  land  means  inde- 
pendence for  those  who  own  it  and  control  over  those  who  depend 
upon  the  owners.  This  is  why  agrarian  reform  is  one  of  the  most  impor- 
tant problems  of  rural  India. 

The  nature  of  Pahari  economic  organization  has  ramifications  in  the 
position  of  women,  which  is  one  of  unusual  freedom  compared  to  that 
of  high-caste  plains  women.  Like  low-caste  women  of  the  plains,  hill 
women  participate  in  the  economy  in  a  way  incompatible  with  seclu- 
sion.1 Their  work  in  fields  and  forests  is  essential  to  the  well-being  of 
their  families.  If  anything,  they  do  more  of  this  kind  of  work  than  the 
men.  Under  the  circumstances  it  would  not  only  be  difficult  for  them 
to  observe  the  niceties  of  seclusion  and  other  disabilities  common  on 
the  plains,  but  also  impossible  for  their  menfolk  to  supervise  them 
closely.  This  is  probably  a  factor  in  the  sexual  freedom  allowed  Pahari 
women. 

The  Pahari  rule  of  bride-price  marriage  is  combined  with  easy  di- 
vorce and  universal  remarriage  for  divorcees  and  widows.  The  family 
of  the  groom  seeks  out  a  bride  and  arranges  the  marriage  with  her 
family,  whereas  in  the  plains,  where  dowry  is  the  rule,  the  bride's  fam- 
ily performs  these  functions.  The  Pahari  bride  is  in  a  sense  considered 
the  property — and  valuable  property — of  the  husband's  joint  family 
who  paid  for  her,  who  derive  benefit  from  her  labor,  and  who  will  give 
her  up  only  upon  return  of  the  bride  price.  Even  after  her  husband's 


conclusion  355 

death  the  family's  interest  in  her  remains.  Usually  she  becomes  her 
husband's  brother's  wife  by  the  custom  of  levirate.  The  idea  of  a  wife 
as  common  property  is  undoubtedly  related  to  the  fact  that  brothers 
share  their  wives'  sexuality  and  that  in  several  Pahari  areas  fraternal 
polyandry  is  the  rule  (Berreman,  1962a). 

Hindu  unorthodoxy  in  the  area  is  due  in  part  to  the  cultural  herit- 
age of  the  Paharis  and  in  part  to  their  isolation  from  areas  where 
modern  Hinduism  developed.  It  is  ascribed  by  Paharis  to  poverty  and 
their  difficult  environment.  They  have  little  time  or  money  for  the 
luxury  of  the  elaborate  rituals  of  the  plains.  They  claim  to  lack  the 
water  for  the  frequent  purificatory  baths  of  plainsmen,  the  leisure  to 
endure  fasts  and  food  taboos,  the  money  to  hire  learned  Brahmins,  and 
the  education  to  appreciate  these  things.  In  this,  as  in  the  freedom  of 
women,  they  are  like  low-caste  people  of  the  plains.  Their  increasing 
awareness  of  this  similarity,  resulting  from  increasing  contacts  with 
plains  people,  leads  high-caste  Paharis  to  aspire  to  emulate  plains  be- 
havior in  order  to  improve  their  relative  status. 

In  discussing  Pahari  culture,  the  plains  have  been  chosen  for  com- 
parison because  the  culture  of  that  area  is  closely  associated  with  that 
of  the  Himalayan  hills.  The  two  areas  have  a  common  cultural  base 
upon  which  differences  stand  out  in  high  relief.  Also,  it  is  among  people 
of  the  plains  that  the  most  comparable  work  has  been  done  upon 
which  comparisons  can  be  based.  However,  one  familiar  with  the 
plains  must  guard  against  plains-oriented  ethnocentrism,  in  which  the 
plains  become  the  yardstick  by  which  Pahari  culture  is  measured.  It  is 
important  to  bear  in  mind  that  Pahari  culture  is  viable  in  its  own  right. 
The  fact  that  it  is  marginal  to  the  Indian  and  North  Indian  culture 
areas  and  that  it  has  also  apparently  been  influenced  from  Tibet  does 
not  mean  that  it  is  a  hodgepodge  of  borrowings  or  a  distorted  reflection 
of  other  cultures.  The  borrowed  traits  have  been  integrated  into  the 
matrix  that  is  Pahari  culture. 

The  observer  of  Pahari  culture  is  struck  not  only  by  the  traits  which 
bear  similarities  to  those  found  in  other  culture  areas  and  that  have 
been  either  borrowed  from  them  or  derived  from  a  common  origin,  but 
also  by  the  unique  traits  that,  so  far  as  can  be  determined,  were  de- 
veloped by  the  residents  of  this  region.  These  range  from  agricultural 
techniques  such  as  complex  feats  of  terracing  and  irrigation,  and 
uniquely  constructed  and  styled  houses,  to  the  songs,  dances,  folklore, 
and  religion  of  the  area. 

Moreover,  the  Pahari  area  has  made  important  contributions  to  the 
cultures  of  adjacent  areas.  The  Hindu  god  Shiva,  for  example,  may 
have  originated  in  Pahari  culture,  and  it  is  not  improbable  that  some 


356  CONCLUSION 

cultural  characteristics  commonly  attributed  to  the  plains  have  ema- 
nated from  the  hills. 

Perhaps  more  significant  than  particular  traits  and  their  affinities 
is  the  distinctive  over-all  configuration  of  Pahari  culture.  To  those  who 
live  it,  Pahari  culture  is  as  distinct  and  as  internally  consistent  as  is 
the  culture  of  any  other  group,  whether  it  be  in  an  area  of  "culture 
climax"  or  in  a  "marginal"  area.  Marginality  is  relative.  From  the 
Pahari's  point  of  view  the  plains  of  North  India  constitute  an  area  as 
marginal  to  his  own  as  do  the  high  Himalayas  to  the  north. 

When  the  Pahari  disparages  his  homeland  and  his  way  of  life  to 
outsiders,  it  does  not  mean  that  he  thinks  them  inferior.  It  merely 
indicates  his  knowledge  of  outsiders'  views  of  him  and  his  anticipation 
of  their  remarks  or  thoughts.  He  may  feel  that  the  time  is  coming  when 
the  modern  plains  way  will  be  the  only  way  to  success  in  a  new  world. 
He  may  envy  a  movie  star  or  a  well-to-do  contractor  or  a  suave  lawyer, 
but  he  does  not  envy  the  plains  villager  or  urban  peon.  He  is  embar- 
rassed by  his  conspicuous  rusticity  when  he  goes  to  town.  He  resents 
taunts  and  exploitation  by  strangers.  But  as  long  as  he  is  in  his  home- 
land, among  his  own  people,  he  sees  the  Pahari  way  of  life  as  superior. 

The  Pahari's  rejection  of  strangers  and  their  ideas  is  in  part  an  indi- 
cation of  his  satisfaction  with  his  own  way  of  life,  a  fact  which  is  fur- 
ther indicated  by  the  community  cohesion  characteristic  of  this  area 
and  by  the  fact  that  few  have  left  the  area.  The  Pahari  ridicules  the 
man  of  the  plains  who  cannot  easily  negotiate  the  mountain  trails,  who 
is  afraid  of  the  terrain  and  its  fauna,  who  cannot  survive  on  its  re- 
sources. He  pities  the  people  of  the  plains  who  do  not  dance,  sing,  and 
drink  together;  whose  women  are  secluded;  whose  widows  cannot  re- 
marry; who  must  drink  stagnant  water  and  breathe  dusty  air;  who  do 
not  eat  meat;  who  suffer  extreme  heat,  and  risk  drought  and  famine  in 
the  hot  season;  who  face  flood  and  malaria  in  the  rainy  season.  Paharis 
work  hard,  but  they  know  how  to  enjoy  their  spare  time  together,  re- 
gardless of  age,  sex,  and  caste  differences,  in  a  way  that  plains  people 
might  envy.  Paharis  are  proud  of  their  way  of  life  and  their  environ- 
ment, but  are  sensitive  to  ridicule  of  them. 

While  it  is  useful  to  analyze  this  culture  in  terms  of  contacts  and  out- 
side sources  of  diffusion,  the  analysis,  if  it  is  to  be  complete,  must  con- 
sider the  adjustments,  innovations,  and  distinctive  integration  which 
make  of  the  Pahari  region  a  culture  area  in  its  own  right.  As  more  data 
become  available  on  the  way  of  life  of  the  peoples  of  surrounding  areas, 
it  will  be  possible  to  determine  more  accurately  the  culture  areas  of 
this  part  of  the  world  and  to  assess  the  mutual  cultural  debts  and 


conclusion  357 

affiliations  of  the  Paharis  and  their  neighbors,  and  the  kinds  and  di- 
rections of  change  they  face. 

In  the  meantime,  the  Himalayan  hill  peoples,  in  common  with 
villagers  all  over  India,  are  beginning  to  play  an  increasingly  important 
role  as  contributors  and  recipients  in  the  development  of  the  national 
culture  of  Independent  India.  They  live  in  a  region  which  will  assume 
increasing  importance  to  the  nation  as  a  reservoir  of  rich  mineral, 
forest,  agricultural,  and  hydraulic  resources,  natural  beauty,  climatic 
attractiveness,  and  religious  inspiration.  The  Paharis  themselves,  as  the 
human  resources,  are  essential  to  the  development  of  this  area  and 
important  in  the  development  of  the  nation.  They  have  much  to  offer 
as  well  as  much  to  learn  if  India  is  to  realize  the  potential  inherent 
in  them  and  in  the  land  they  occupy. 


Bibliography 


Atkinson,  Edwin  T. 

1882,  1884a,  1886  The  Himalayan  Districts  of  the  North-Western  Provinces 
of  India.  Vol.  I  (1882);  Vol.  II  (1884);  Vol.  Ill  (1886),  comprising  Vols. 
X-XII  of  the  Gazetteer  of  the  North-Western  Provinces  and  Oudh. 
Allahabad:  North- Western  Provinces  and  Oudh  Press. 
1884b,  1885  "Notes  on  the  History  of  Religion  in  the  Himalaya  of  the 
N.  W.  Provinces."  Journal  of  the  Asiatic  Society  of  Bengal,  Vol.  53 
(1884),  39-103;  Vol.  54  (1885),  1-16. 
Bacon,  Elizabeth 

1946       "A    Preliminary    Attempt    to    Determine    the    Culture    Areas    of 
Asia."   Southwestern  Journal   of  Anthropology,  Vol.   2,   pp.    117- 
132. 
Baden-Powell,  B.  H. 

1892       The  Land-System  of  British  India,  3  vols.  Oxford:  Clarendon  Press. 
Bahadur,  Rai  Pati  Ram 

1916       Garhwal,  Ancient  and  Modern.  Simla:  Army  Press. 
Bailey,  F.  G. 

1957  Caste  and  the  Economic  Frontier.  Manchester:  University  Press. 
1959       "For  a  Sociology  of  India?"  Contributions  to  Indian  Sociology,  Vol. 

3,  pp.  88-101. 
Banfield,  Edward  C. 

1958  The  Moral  Basis  of  a  Backward  Society.  Glencoe,  111.:  Free  Press. 
Basham,  A.  L. 

1954       The  Wonder  That  Was  India,  Evergreen  edition.  New  York:  Grove 
Press. 


360  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Beals,  Alan 

1954       "The  Government  and  the  Indian  Village."  Economic  Development 

and  Cultural  Change,  Vol.  2,  pp.  397-407. 
Beidelman,  Thomas  O. 

1959       A  Comparative  Analysis  of  the  Jajmani  System.  Locust  Valley,  N.Y.: 

J.  J.  Augustin. 
Berreman,  Gerald  D. 

ig55       "Inquiry   into   Community   Integration   in    an   Aleutian   Village." 

American  Anthropologist,  Vol.  57,  pp.  49-59. 
1959       "Kin,  Caste  and  Community  in  a  Himalayan  Hill  Village."  Ph.D. 

dissertation,  Department  of  Sociology  and  Anthropology,  Cornell 

University.  Ann  Arbor:  University  Microfilms. 
1960a     "Caste  in  India  and  the  United  States."  American  Journal  of  Soci- 
ology, Vol.  66,  pp.  120-127. 
1960b     "Cultural  Variability  and  Drift  in  the  Himalayan  Hills."  American 

Anthropologist,  Vol.  62,  pp.  774-794. 
1961a     "Brahmins  and  Shamans  in  Pahari  Religion."  Paper  presented  to 

the  Seminar  on  South  Asian  Religion,  Berkeley,  Calif.,  August  21- 

25,  1961. 
1961b     "Himalayan  Rope  Sliding  and  Village  Hinduism:   An  Analysis." 

Southwestern  Journal  of  Anthropology,  Vol.  17,  pp.  326-342. 
1962a     "Pahari    Polyandry:    A    Comparison."    American    Anthropologist, 

Vol.  64,  pp.  60-75. 
1962b     "Caste  and  Economy  in  the  Himalayas."  Economic  Development 

and  Cultural  Change,  Vol.  10,  pp.  386-394. 
1962c     Behind  Many  Masks:  Ethnography  and  Impression  Management  in 

a  Himalayan  Village.  Monograph  4,  Ithaca,  N.  Y.:  Society  for  Ap- 
plied Anthropology. 
ig62d     "Village  Exogamy  in  Northernmost  India."  Southwestern  Journal 

of  Anthropology,  Vol.  18,  pp.  55-58. 
1962c     "Sib  and  Clan  Among  the  Pahari  of  North  India."  Ethnology,  Vol. 

1,  pp.  524-528. 
Blunt,  E.  A.  H. 

1931       The  Caste  System  of  Northern  India.  London:  H.  Milford,  Oxford 

University  Press. 
Bose,  N.  K. 

1958       "Some  Aspects  of  Caste  in  Bengal."  American  Journal  of  Folklore, 

Vol.  71,  pp.  397-412. 
Bougie,  C. 

1908       Essais  sur  le  Regime  des  castes.  Paris:   Librairies  F^lix  Alcan   et 

Guillaumin  R^unies. 
Briffault,  Robert 

1927       The  Mothers,  Vol.  I.  New  York:  The  Macmillan  Company. 
Brown,  W.  Norman 

1953       The    United  States  and  India   and  Pakistan.   Cambridge,    Mass.: 

Harvard  University  Press. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  36 1 

Census  of  India,  1931 

1933       Bengal  and  Sikkim,  Vol.  5.  Calcutta:  Central  Publication  Branch. 

1933  Punjab,  Vol.  17  (Parts  I  and  II).  Lahore:  Civil  and  Military  Gazette 
Press. 

1933  United  Provinces  of  Agra  and  Oudh,  Vol.  18  (Parts  I  and  II).  Alla- 
habad: Superintendent,  Printing  and  Stationery,  United  Provinces. 

n.d.        Jammu  and  Kashmir  State,  Vol.  24.  Jammu:   Ranbir  Government 
Press. 
Census  of  India,  1941 

1943       Jammu  and  Kashmir,  Vol.  22.  Ranbir:  Ranbir  Government  Press. 
Census  of  India,  1951 

1952a  Paper  No.  2,  Population  Zones,  Natural  Regions,  Sub-Regions  and 
Divisions.  New  Delhi:  Government  of  India  Photo-Litho  Press. 

1952b  District  Population  Statistics,  Uttar  Pradesh:  I.  Dehra  Dun  District. 
Allahabad:  Superintendent,  Printing  and  Stationery,  Uttar  Pradesh. 

1952c  Volume  II,  Uttar  Pradesh,  Part  Ha,  General  Population  Tables. 
Allahabad:  Superintendent,  Printing  and  Stationery,  Uttar  Pradesh. 

ig53  District  Population  Statistics,  Uttar  Pradesh:  XXXIX.  Tehri- 
Garhwal  District.  Allahabad:  Superintendent,  Printing  and  Sta- 
tionery, Uttar  Pradesh. 

1954  District  Census  Handbook,  Uttar  Pradesh:  I.  Dehra  Dun  District. 
Allahabad:  Superintendent,  Printing  and  Stationery,  Uttar  Pradesh. 

1955  District  Census  Handbook,  Uttar  Pradesh:  XXXIX.  Tehri-Garhwal 
District.  Allahabad:  Superintendent,  Printing  and  Stationery,  Uttar 
Pradesh. 

Cohn,  Bernard  S. 

1954  "The  Camars  of  Senapur:  A  Study  of  the  Changing  Status  of  a 
Depressed  Caste."  Ph.D.  dissertation,  Department  of  Sociology  and 
Anthropology,  Cornell  University.  Ann  Arbor:  University  Micro- 
films. 

1955  "The  Changing  Status  of  a  Depressed  Caste,"  in  Village  India,  ed. 
by  McKim  Marriott.  Memoir  83,  American  Anthropological  Associ- 
ation, Vol.  57,  pp.  53-77. 

Cohn,  Bernard  S.,  and  McKim  Marriott 

1958       "Networks  and  Centres  in  the  Integration  of  Indian  Civilization." 
Journal  of  Social  Research  (Bihar  University),  Vol.  1,  pp.  1-9. 
Corbett,  Jim 

1946       Man-Eaters  of  Kumaon.  New  York:  Oxford  University  Press. 
Crooke,  William 

1926       Religion  and  Folklore  of  Northern  India.  London:   Oxford  Uni- 
versity Press. 
Davis,  Kingsley 

1949       Human  Society.  New  York:  The  Macmillan  Company. 
Dollard,  John 

1957  Caste  and  Class  in  a  Southern  Town,  3rd  edition.  Garden  City, 
N.  Y.:  Doubleday. 


362  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Dube,  S.  C. 

!955       Indian  Village.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.:  Cornell  University  Press. 

1956  "Cultural  Factors  in  Rural  Community  Development."  Journal  of 
Asian  Studies,  Vol.  16,  pp.  19-30. 

1958  India's  Changing  Villages.  London:  Routledge  and  Kegan  Paul. 
Dumont,  Louis,  and  D.  Pocock,  eds. 

1957  Contributions  to  Indian  Sociology,  No.  1.  Paris:  Mouton. 

1958  Contributions  to  India?!  Sociology,  No.  2.  Paris:  Mouton. 
Dwivedi,  J.  N. 

i957(?)  Practice  and  Digest  of  U.  P.  Panchayat  Raj,  2nd  edition.  Allahabad: 
Allahabad  Law  Agency. 
Fraser,  James  B. 

1820       Journal  of  a  Tour  Through  Part  of  the  Snowy  Range  of  the  Himala 
Mountains  and  to  the  Sources  of  the  Rivers  Jumna  and  Ganges. 
London:  Rodwell  and  Martin. 
Gadgil,  D.  R. 

1952       Poona,  A  Socio-Economic  Survey,  Part  II.  Poona:  Gokhale  Institute 
of  Politics  and  Economics. 
Gandhi,  M.  K. 

1952       Rebuilding  Our  Villages.  Ahmedabad:  Navajivan  Publishing  House. 
Ghurye,  G.  S. 

1952       Caste  and  Class  in  India.  New  York:  Philosophical  Library. 
Gilbert,  William  H. 

1948       "Caste  in  India,   a  Bibliography."  Washington,   D.C.:    Library  of 
Congress.  (Mimeographed.) 
Goffman,  Erving 

1959  The  Presentation   of  Self  in  Everyday   Life.   Garden   City,   N.Y.: 
Doubleday. 

Gorer,  Geoffrey 

1938       Himalayan  Village.  London:  Michael  Joseph. 
Gough  (Aberle),  Kathleen 

1959  "Criteria  of  Caste  Ranking  in  South  India."  Man  in  India,  Vol.  39, 
pp.  115-126. 

Gould,  Harold  A. 

i960       "The  Micro-Demography  of  Marriages  in  a  North  Indian  Area." 

Southwestern  Journal  of  Anthropology,  Vol.  16,  pp.  476-491. 
ig6ia     "Sanskritization  and  Westernization:  A  Dynamic  View."  Economic 

Weekly,  Vol.  13  (No.  25),  pp.  945~95°- 
1961b     "A  Further  Note  on  Village  Exogamy  in  North  India."  Southwest- 
ern Journal  of  Anthropology,  Vol.  17,  pp.  297-300. 
Grierson,  George  A. 

1916       Linguistic  Survey  of  India,  Vol.  IX,  Part  IV.  Calcutta:  Superintend- 
ent of  Government  Printing. 
Harper,  Edward  B. 

1957       "Shamanism  in  South  India."  Southiuestern  Journal  of  Anthropol- 
ogy, Vol.  13,  pp.  267-287. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  363 

Himachal  Times 

1958a     "Demand   for  Separate   Hill   State."   Himachal   Times,  Mussoorie- 

Dehra  Dun,  Vol.  X,  No.  21  (June  5,  1958),  1. 
1958b     "Congress     Men     Threaten     Direct     Action."     Himachal     Times. 
Mussoorie-Dehra  Dun,  Vol.  X,  No.  31  (August  8,  1958),  1. 
Hitchcock,  John  T. 

1956  "The  Rajputs  of  Khaalaapur:  A  Study  of  Kinship,  Social  Stratifi- 
cation, and  Politics."  Ph.D.  dissertation,  Department  of  Sociology 
and  Anthropology,  Cornell  University.  Ann  Arbor:  University  Mi- 
crofilms. 

Hocart,  A.  M. 

1950       Caste,  A  Comparative  Study.  London:  Methuen. 
Hutton,  J.  H. 

1946       Caste  in  India.  Cambridge,  England:  Cambridge  University  Press. 
Iijima,  Shigeru 

i960       "The  Thakali — A  Central  Himalayan  Tribe"  (Torbo  Ethnography 
No.  2).  Japanese  Journal  of  Ethnology,  Vol.  24,  No.  3,  pp.  1-22.  (In 
Japanese.) 
1961       Agriculture  and  Land  System  in  Nepal  (Research  Series  18).  Tokyo: 
Institute  of  Asian  Economics.  (In  Japanese.) 
Jain,  S.  C. 

1948       "Some  Features  of  Fraternal  Polyandry  in  Jaunsar  Bawar."  Eastern 
Anthropologist,  Vol.  1,  No.  2,  pp.  27-33. 
Joshi,  L.  D. 

1929  The  Khasa  Family  Law  in  the  Himalayan  Districts  of  the  United 
Provinces  of  India.  Allahabad:  Superintendent,  Government  Press, 
U.  P. 

Karve,  Irawati 

1953       Kinship  Organization  in  India.  Deccan  College  Monograph  Series 
11.  Poona:  Deccan  College  Postgraduate  and  Research  Institute. 
Kawakita,  Jiro 

1957  "Ethno-Geographical  Observations  on  the  Nepal  Himalaya,"  in 
Scientific  Results  of  the  Japanese  Expeditions  to  Nepal  Himalaya, 
I952~53>  Vol.  3  (Peoples  of  Nepal  Himalaya),  ed.  by  Hitoshi  Kihara. 
Kyoto:  Fauna  and  Flora  Research  Society.  Pp.  1-362. 

1961       "Some  Ecological  Observations  in  Nepal  Himalaya"  (Torbo  Ethnog- 
raphy No.  3).  Japanese  Journal  of  Ethnology,  Vol.  25,  No.  4,  pp. 
1-42.  (In  Japanese.) 
Kroeber,  Alfred  L. 

1930  "Caste,"  in  Encyclopedia  of  the  Social  Sciences,  Vol.  3,  ed.  by  E.  R. 
A.  Seligman  and  Alvin  Johnson.  New  York:  The  Macmillan  Com- 
pany. Pp.  254-256. 

1948       Anthropology.  New  York:  Harcourt,  Brace. 
Leach,  E.  R. 

i960  "Introduction:  What  Should  We  Mean  by  Caste,"  in  Aspects  of 
Caste  in  South  India,  Ceylon  and  North-west  Pakistan,  ed.  by  E.  R. 


364  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Leach.  Cambridge  Papers  in  Social  Anthropology,  No.  2,  pp.  1-10. 
Cambridge,  England:  Cambridge  University  Press. 
Lewis,  Oscar 

1958  Village  Life  in  Northern  India.  Urbana:  University  of  Illinois  Press. 

1959  "Review  of  Pilot  Project,  India,  by  Albert  Mayer  et  al."  American 
Anthropologist,  Vol.  61,  pp.  534-536. 

Lipset,  Seymour  M.,  and  Reinhard  Bendix 

i960       Social  Mobility  in  Industrial  Society.  Berkeley  and  Los  Angeles: 
University  of  California  Press. 
Lowie,  R.  H. 

1947       Primitive  Society.  New  York:  Liveright. 
Mahar,  James  M. 

1958       "Occupational  Adjustment  in  a  Caste  Society."  Paper  read  before 
the  57th  annual  meeting  of  the  American  Anthropological  Associ- 
ation, Washington,  D.C.,  November  20,   1958. 
Mahar,  Pauline  Moller 

*957  "The  Functional  Relations  of  a  Hindu  Cult."  Paper  read  before  the 
meeting  of  the  Society  for  Scientific  Study  of  Religion,  Cambridge, 
Mass.,  November  2,  1957. 

1958  "Changing  Caste  Ideology  in  a  North  Indian  Village."  Journal  of 
Social  Issues,  Vol.  14,  No.  4,  pp.  51-65. 

1959  "A  Multiple  Scaling  Technique  for  Caste  Ranking."  Man  in  India, 
Vol.  39,  pp.  115-126. 

i960       "Changing  Religious  Practices  of  an  Untouchable  Caste."  Economic 
Development  and  Cultural  Change,  Vol.  8,  pp.  279-287. 
Majumdar,  D.  N. 

1944       The  Fortunes  of  Primitive  Tribes.  Lucknow:  Universal  Publishers. 

1955       "Demographic  Structure  in  a  Polyandrous  Village."  Eastern  Anthro- 
pologist, Vol.  8,  pp.  161-172. 
Mandelbaum,  David  G. 

*955       "The  World  and  the  World  View  of  the  Kota,"  in  Village  India,  ed. 
by  McKim  Marriott.  Memoir  83,  American  Anthropological  Associ- 
ation, Vol.  57,  pp.  223-254. 
Marriott,  McKim 

*955a  "Little  Communities  in  an  Indigenous  Civilization,"  in  Village  In- 
dia, ed.  by  McKim  Marriott.  Memoir  83,  American  Anthropological 
Association,  Vol.  57,  pp.  171-222. 

1959  "Interactional  and  Attributional  Theories  of  Caste  Ranking."  Man 
in  India,  Vol.  39,  pp.  92-107. 

i960       Caste  Ranking  and  Community  Structure  in  Five  Regions  of  India 
and  Pakistan.  Deccan  College  Monograph  Series  23,  Poona:  Deccan 
College  Postgraduate  and  Research  Institute. 
Marriott,  McKim,  ed. 

1955b  Village  India,  Memoir  83,  American  Anthropological  Association, 
Vol.  57,  No.  3,  Part  2. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  365 

Mayer,  Adrian  C. 

1958  "The  Dominant  Caste  in  a  Region  of  Central  India."  Southwestern 
Journal  of  Anthropology,  Vol.  14,  pp.  407-427. 

Merton,  Robert  K.,  and  Alice  Kitt 

1950       "Contributions  to  the  Theory  of  Reference  Group  Behavior,"  in 

Continuities  in  Social  Research,  ed.  by  R.  K.  Merton  and  P.  F. 

Lazarsfeld.  Glencoe,  111.:  Free  Press.  Pp.  40-105. 
Morgan,  Kenneth  W.,  ed. 

1953  The  Religion  of  the  Hindus.  New  York:  Ronald  Press. 
"Mountaineer"  [Mr.  Wilson  of  Mussoorie] 

i860       A  Summer  Ramble  in  the  Himalayas.  London:  Hurst  and  Blackett. 
Munshi,  K.  M. 

1955       "Forward,"  in  Social  Economy   of  a  Polyandrous  People,  ed.   by 
R.  N.  Saksena.  Agra:  Agra  University  Press.  Pp.  i-viii. 
Murdock,  George  P. 

1949  Social  Structure.  New  York:  The  Macmillan  Company. 
Nadel,  S.  F. 

1954  "Caste  and  Government  in  Primitive  Society."  Journal  of  the  An- 
thropological Society  of  Bombay,  Vol.  8,  pp.  9-22. 

Nevill,  H.  R. 

1904  Naini  Tal:  A  Gazetteer,  comprising  Vol.  XXXIV  of  the  District 
Gazetteers  of  the  United  Provinces  of  Agra  and  Oudh.  Allahabad: 
Government  Press. 

Newcomb,  Theodore  M. 

1950  Social  Psychology.  New  York:  Dryden  Press. 
Newell,  William  H. 

1954  "A  Note  on  Village  Government  in  the  Indian  Northern  Hill  States 
Since  Indian  Independence."  Economic  Development  and  Cultural 
Change,  Vol.  2,  pp.  416-419. 

1955  "Goshen,  a  Gaddi  Village  in  the  Himalayas,"  in  India's  Villages, 
Development  Department,  West  Bengal  Government.  Calcutta: 
West  Bengal  Government  Press.  Pp.  51-61. 

Niehoff,  Arthur 

1959  "Caste  and  Industrial  Organization  in  North  India,"  Administra- 
tive Science  Quarterly,  Vol.  3,  pp.  494-508. 

Oakley,  E.  S. 

1905  Holy  Himalaya.  Edinburgh:   Oliphant  Anderson  and  Ferrier. 
Olcott,  Mason 

1944       "The  Caste  System  of  India."  American  Sociological  Review,  Vol. 
9,  pp.  648-657. 
O'Malley,  L.  S.  S. 

1932       Indian  Caste  Customs.  New  York:  Cambridge  University  Press. 
Opler,  Morris  E. 

1956  "The  Extensions  of  an  Indian  Village."  Journal  of  Asian  Studies, 
Vol.  16,  pp.  5-10. 


366  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

1958  "Spiritual  Possession  in  a  Rural  Area  of  Northern  India,"  in 
Reader  in  Comparative  Religion,  ed.  by  W.  A.  Lessa  and  E.  Z.  Vogt. 
Evanston:  Row,  Peterson.  Pp.  553-566. 
1959a  "Family,  Anxiety  and  Religion  in  a  Community  of  North  India," 
in  Culture  and  Mental  Health:  Cross-Cultural  Studies,  ed.  by  Mar- 
vin K.  Opler.  New  York:  The  Macmillan  Company.  Pp.  273-289. 
1959b     "The  Place  of  Religion  in  a  North  Indian  Village."  Southwestern 

Journal  of  Anthropology,  Vol.  15,  pp.  219-226. 
i960       "Political  Organization  and  Economic  Growth,  the  Case  of  Village 
India."  International  Review  of  Community  Development,  No.  5, 
pp.  187-197. 
Opler,  Morris  E.,  and  R.  D.  Singh 

1948       "The  Division  of  Labor  in  an  Indian  Village,"  in  A  Reader  in  Gen- 
eral Anthropology,  ed.  by  C.  S.  Coon.  New  York:  Henry  Holt  and 
Company.  Pp.  464-496. 
Pant,  S.  D. 

1935       The  Social  Economy  of  the  Himalayans.  London:  George  Allen  and 
Unwin. 
Pargiter,  F.  E. 

1922       Ancient  Indian  Historical  Tradition.  London:   Oxford  University 
Press. 
Passin,  Herbert 

J955       "Untouchability  in  the  Far  East."  Monumenta  Nipponica,  Vol.  11, 
pp.  27-47. 
Perelman,  S.  J. 

1947       Westward  Ha!  New  York:  Simon  and  Schuster. 
Planalp,  Jack  M. 

1956  "Religious  Life  and  Values  in  a  North  Indian  Village."  Ph.D.  dis- 
sertation, Department  of  Sociology  and  Anthropology,  Cornell  Uni- 
versity. Ann  Arbor:  University  Microfilms. 

Planning  Commission,  Government  of  India 

1958       The  New  India:  Progress   Through  Democracy.   New  York:    The 
Macmillan  Company. 
Raturi,  Pundit  Hari  Krishnan 

1928       Garhwal  ka  Ityhas  (History  of  Garhwal).  Dehra  Dun:  Garhwali  Press. 
(In  Hindi.) 
Redfield,  Robert 

x955  "The  Social  Organization  of  Tradition."  Far  Eastern  Quarterly, 
Vol.  15,  pp.  13-22. 

1957  The  Primitive  World  and  Its  Transformations,  Great  Seal  Books. 
Ithaca:  Cornell  University  Press. 

Rosser,  Collin 

ig55       "A  'Hermit'  Village  in  Kulu,"  in  India's  Villages,  Development  De- 
partment, West  Bengal  Government.  Calcutta:  West  Bengal  Gov- 
ernment Press.  Pp.  70-81. 
n.d.        The  Valley  of  the  Gods.  London:  Kimber  (in  press). 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  367 

Rowe,  William  L. 

1960a  "Social  and  Economic  Mobility  in  a  Low-Caste  North  Indian  Com- 
munity." Ph.D.  dissertation,  Department  of  Sociology  and  Anthro- 
pology, Cornell  University.  Ann  Arbor:  University  Microfilms. 
1960b  "The  Marriage  Network  and  Structural  Change  in  a  North  Indian 
Community,"  Southwestern  Journal  of  Anthropology,  Vol.  16, 
PP-  299-311. 
Ryan,  Bryce 

1953       Caste  in  Modern  Ceylon.  New  Brunswick,  N.  J.:  Rutgers  University 
Press. 
Saksena,  R.  N. 

x955       Social  Economy  of  a  Polyandrous  People.  Agra:   Agra  University 
Institute  of  Social  Sciences. 
Sankrityayana,  Rahul 

1958  Kumaon.  Banaras:  Jana  Mandal.  (In  Hindi.) 
Sharma,  K.  N. 

1961       "Occupational  Mobility  of  Castes  in  a  North  Indian  Village."  South- 
western Journal  of  Anthropology,  Vol.  17,  pp.  146-164. 
Singer,  Milton 

x955       "The  Cultural  Pattern  of  Indian  Civilization."  Far  Eastern  Quar- 
terly, Vol.  15,  pp.  23-36. 
Singh,  Kailash  K. 

1957       "Inter-caste  Tensions  in  Two  Villages  in  North  India."  Ph.D.  dis- 
sertation, Department  of  Sociology  and  Anthropology,  Cornell  Uni- 
versity. Ann  Arbor:  University  Microfilms. 
Sivananda,  Swami 

1947       Hindu  Fasts  and  Festivals  and  Their  Philosophy.  Rikhikesh:  Siva- 
nanda Publication  League. 
Smith,  Robert  J. 

1956       "The  Problem  of  Extensions  of  a  Community."  Cornell  University 
Studies  in  Culture  and  Applied  Science,  Cornell  University.  (Mime- 
ographed.) 
Srinivas,  M.  N. 

1952  Religion  and  Society  Among  the  Coorgs  of  South  India.  Oxford: 
Clarendon  Press. 

1955a  "Castes:  Can  They  Exist  in  India  of  Tomorrow?"  Economic  Weekly 
(Bombay),  Vol.  7,  pp.  1230-1232. 

1955b  "The  Social  System  of  a  Mysore  Village,"  in  Village  India,  ed.  by 
McKim  Marriott.  Memoir  83,  American  Anthropological  Associa- 
tion, Vol.  57,  pp.  1-35. 

1956  "A  Note  on  Sanskritization  and  Westernization."  Far  Eastern 
Quarterly,  Vol.  15,  pp.  481-496. 

*957  "Caste  in  Modern  India."  Journal  of  Asian  Studies,  Vol.  16,  pp. 
529-548. 

1959  "The  Dominant  Caste  in  Rampura."  American  Anthropologist,  Vol. 
61,  pp.  1-16. 


368  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Srivastava,  R.  P. 

1958  "The  Bhotia  Nomads  and  Their  Indo-Tibetan  Trade."  Journal  of 
the  University  of  Saugar,  Vol.  7,  Part  1,  Sec.  A,  pp.  1-22. 

Stevenson,  H.  N.  C. 

1954       "Status  Evaluation  in   the   Hindu  Caste  System."  Journal  of   the 
Royal  Anthropological  Institute  of  Great  Britain  and  Ireland,  Vol. 
84,  pp.  45-65. 
Stowell,  V.  A. 

1907       A  Manual  of  the  Land  Tenures  of  the  Kumaun  Division.  Allahabad: 
United  Provinces  Government  Press. 
Tinker,  Hugh 

1959  "Authority  and  Community  in  Village  India."  Pacific  Affairs,  Vol. 

32,  PP-  354-375- 
Tod,  James 

1829-1832     Annals  and  Antiquities  of  Rajast'han,  2  vols.  London:  Smith, 
Elder. 
Traill,  G.  W. 

1828      "Statistical  Sketch  of  Kamaon."  Asiatic  Researches,  Vol.  16,  pp.  137— 

234- 
Turner,  Ralph 

1956       "Role-Taking,  Role  Standpoint,  and  Reference-Group  Behavior." 
American  Journal  of  Sociology,  Vol.  61,  pp.  316-328. 
Upreti,  Pandit  Ganga  Datt 

1894       Proverbs  and  Folklore  of  Kumaun  and  Garhwal.  Lodiana:  Lodiana 
Mission  Press. 
Walton,  H.  G. 

1910       British  Garhwal:  A  Gazetteer,  comprising  Vol.  XXXVI  of  the  Dis- 
trict Gazetteer  of  the  United  Provinces  of  Agra  and  Oudh.  Alla- 
habad: Government  Press. 
1911a     Dehra  Dun:  A  Gazetteer,  comprising  Vol.  I  of  die  District  Gazetteer 
of  the  United  Provinces  of  Agra  and  Oudh.  Allahabad:   Govern- 
ment Press. 
1911b     Almora:  A  Gazetteer,  comprising  Vol.  XXXV  of  the  District  Gazet- 
teer of  the  United  Provinces  of  Agra  and  Oudh.  Allahabad:  Gov- 
ernment Press. 
Weber,  Max 

1958       The  Religion  of  India,  tr.  and  ed.  by  H.  H.  Gerth  and  D.  Martin- 
dale.  Glencoe,  111.:  Free  Press. 
Williams,  G.  R.  C. 

1874       Historical  and  Statistical  Memoir  of  Dehra  Doon.  Roorkee:  Thoma- 
son  Civil  Engineering  College  Press. 
Wiser,  Charlotte  V.,  and  William  H. 

1951       Behind  Mud  Walls,  3rd  printing.  New  York:  Agricultural  Missions. 
Wiser,  William  H. 

1936       The  Hindu  Jajmani  System.  Lucknow:  Lucknow  Publishing  House. 


Appendixes 


APPENDIX   I:    GODS 
WORSHIPED    IN    SIRKANDA 


A.  Household  Gods 

The  following  gods  are  worshiped  separately  by  particular  house- 
holds in  Sirkanda,  before  shrines  maintained  by  each  household,  and 
usually  without  the  aid  of  Brahmin  priests. 

Nar  Singh 

The  god  Nar  Singh,  though  generally  referred  to  as  a  single  god, 
has  three  manifestations  which  require  separate  worship:  Dudadharl 
Nar  Singh,  Janghoria  Nar  Singh,  and  Kerarl  Nar  Singh.  The  first  of 
these  is  by  far  the  most  often  worshiped  of  the  three,  and  he  is  the 
gentlest,  his  name  deriving  from  the  word  for  milk.  The  second  has  the 
reputation  of  being  the  most  dangerous.  It  is  difficult  to  determine  in 
any  particular  household  which  of  the  three  is  worshiped,  since  they  are 
identical  in  representation  and  in  the  worship  demanded.  Many  vil- 
lagers themselves  are  not  clear  as  to  the  distinctions  or  even  which  one 
is  worshiped  in  their  own  household.  At  least  two  households  worship 
two  of  these  manifestations  and  have  two  separate  shrines  honoring 
them.  Two  tirsuls  are  used  to  represent  Nar  Singh  (v^  P ).  During 
kalratra,  musical  accompaniment  is  provided  by  a  brass  tray  placed  on 
a  butter  churn  and  beaten  by  the  pujari,  and  a  large  drum  played  by 


370  APPENDIX   I 

a  local  Bajgi.  Those  who  become  possessed  by  this  god  often  use  iron 
chains  to  beat  themselves  and  may  also  rub  ashes  on  their  bodies.  These 
mortifications  are  done  most  vigorously  when  the  most  virulent  form 
of  this  god  is  in  possession.  Informants  pointed  out  that  in  earlier  days 
this  god  was  more  feared  and  hence  more  frequently  worshiped  than 
at  present.  However,  he  was  worshiped  more  than  once  during  1957- 
1958.  His  affinity  to  the  incarnation  of  Vishnu  which  appears  by  the 
name  Narsingh  in  the  great  tradition  was  unknown  to  most  villagers. 
Until  recent  years  most  households  in  Sirkanda  contained  shrines 
to  Nar  Singh.  Then  some  households  became  divided  among  them- 
selves on  the  question  of  whether  or  not  to  worship  this  god;  more 
importantly,  other  households  had  split  up  as  economic  units  and  no 
longer  wished  to  worship  the  god  together  as  a  household.  The  matter 
was  solved  when  members  of  the  households  who  wished  to  continue 
the  worship  took  their  tirsuls  to  a  tree  near  the  village  where  other 
shrines  are  located,  and  deposited  them  there  at  the  base  of  a  large 
rock.  Subsequently  other  households  have  followed  suit,  and  now  a 
number  of  families  carry  out  their  worship  at  that  spot,  though  some 
still  keep  shrines  in  their  homes.  The  shrine  at  the  tree  resembles,  in 
most  respects,  other  shrines  to  village  gods  and  is  in  fact  very  close  to 
three  village  shrines.  It  is  not,  however,  termed  a  temple  (mandir),  as 
are  other  village  shrines,  nor  is  it  worshiped  by  the  village  at  large. 
This  deity  may  be  undergoing  metamorphosis  from  a  household  god 
to  a  village  god  (see  Appendix  IB). 

Manglia 

This  god  is  similar  in  many  ways  to  Nar  Singh.  His  shrines  and 
tirsuls  are  identical.  He  is,  however,  mild  in  his  demands  and  punish- 
ments. When  he  possesses  a  person,  the  person  dances  gently  and 
shivers  and  shakes  softly  as  compared  to  the  effect  of  other  gods,  and 
the  body  of  the  dancer  is  not  mortified  in  any  way  during  the  dance. 
In  Sirkanda  only  Rajputs  worship  Manglia,  although  no  one  feels 
that  the  god  could  not  also  demand  worship  from  others.  Reportedly 
the  pujari  for  this  god  must  be  a  Bajgi  who  plays  either  of  two  types 
of  drums.  These  types  of  drums  are  used  in  pujas  for  most  household 
gods  except  in  those  for  Gauril.  Manglia  was  last  worshiped  about  a 
year  before  I  arrived  in  Sirkanda.  He  was  alleged  to  have  come  orig- 
inally from  Jaunpur,  an  area  in  Tehri  Garhwal  north  of  Bhatbair. 

Gauril 

Gauril  is  the  most  prominent  household  god  in  Sirkanda  from  the 
point  of  view  of  interest  and  frequency  and  intensity  of  worship, 


APPENDIX   I  371 

though  not  in  terms  of  number  of  devotees.  He  is  a  god  whose  prom- 
inence is  not  fading,  as  some  others  are  said  to  be.  He  is  worshiped  by 
Brahmins,  Rajputs,  blacksmiths,  and  Bajgis.  No  one  who  worships 
Manglia  also  worships  Gauril. 

Worship  of  Gauril  is  more  complex  and  varied  than  that  of  other 
household  gods,  and  in  Sirkanda  there  is  more  known  mythology  sur- 
rounding him  than  any  other  household  god.  As  a  result  of  lore  about 
this  god  transmitted  by  his  pujaris,  Gauril's  believers  in  Sirkanda  know 
the  rather  elaborate  tale  of  the  marriage  of  Gauril's  parents,  his  birth, 
his  relationship  to  other  gods  associated  with  him,  and  stories  of  his 
power  and  accomplishments. 

Gauril  is  never  alone.  He  is  in  inseparable  association  with  his  three 
deputies  or  assistants:  the  gods  Kalua  and  Kdld  Kalua,  and  the  goddess 
Gardevi.  These  three  are  said  to  be  three  of  the  hundred  siblings  born 
or  created  as  the  infant  Gauril  was  thrown  one  hundred  times  into 
scorpion  plants  by  a  jealous  co-wife  of  his  mother.  The  foursome  is 
referred  to  collectively  under  the  name  Gauril.  A  single  shrine  is  de- 
voted to  them  as  a  group,  and  they  are  always  collectively  identified  as 
Gauril  in  cases  of  possession. 

The  tirsuls  which  go  to  make  up  the  Gauril  shrine  are  four  in  num- 
ber (^f^Y P p)  representing,  respectively,  Gauril,  Gardevi,  Kalua,  and 
Kala  Kalua.  During  pujas  four  lamps  and  a  container  of  grain  with  a 
few  coins  in  it  are  placed  in  the  shrine.  For  the  dance  a  special  type 
of  drum,  used  on  no  other  occasion,  is  employed  by  a  pujari.  During 
possession,  demands  are  made  by  Gauril,  but  only  for  his  assistants.  He 
himself  never  tortures  people  nor  makes  demands  in  his  own  name.  He 
is  satisfied  at  receiving  a  little  sujl  (farina)  fried  in  ghee  and  sugar. 
The  female  assistant  can  usually  be  appeased  by  sacrifice  of  a  cock,  and 
the  male  assistants  are  satisfied  with  sacrifice  of  a  goat.  A  coconut  is  also 
frequently  offered  in  the  name  of  Gardevi.1  Gardevi  is  well  known  else- 
where as  a  form  of  the  mother  goddess,  unassociated  with  Gauril. 

Two  special  pujas  may  be  performed  in  the  name  of  Gauril,  usually 
in  response  to  demands  made  during  periods  of  possession.  One  is 
demanded  by  Gardevi  to  honor  a  being  identified  locally  as  her  con- 
sort M asan,  who  does  not  otherwise  receive  notice.  Masan  is  often  iden- 
tified in  other  areas  as  a  ghost  or  a  type  of  ghost  which  inhabits  cre- 
mation grounds.  The  puja  in  his  honor  in  this  area  is  called  Samen 
and  is  usually  demanded  only  when  severe  forms  of  torment  have  been 
inflicted  on  people  as  a  result  of  the  god's  extreme  anger.  This  puja 
involves  a  series  of  seventeen  dances  over  a  period  of  nine  days  fol- 
lowed by  an  offering  at  the  cremation  grounds.  The  required  offerings 
include  five  kinds  of  animals,  water  from  seven  places,  flour  from  seven 


372  APPENDIX    I 

mills  made  into  an  image  of  Shamshan,  seven  kinds  of  grain,  seven  kinds 
of  thorns,  fruit,  jewelry  (for  Gardevi),  and  sixty-four  dough  lamps — 
altogether  a  complex  and  expensive  undertaking.  The  ceremony  oc- 
curs about  once  every  two  years  in  Sirkanda.  It  had  been  given  by  one 
family  in  1957  and  was  promised  by  another  for  late  1958. 

The  other  important  special  puja  for  Gauril  is  in  honor  of  his  birth, 
Gauril  ki  ashtami,  and  is  commonly  referred  to  by  the  term  for  one  of 
the  ceremonial  elements  in  it,  hariall  (green).  It  is  held  upon  demand 
and  allegedly  would  be  held  every  few  years  even  if  not  demanded.  For 
this  puja  the  tirsuls  of  the  three  gods  are  plastered  with  rice  and  that 
of  Gardevi  is  ornamented  with  bangles  on  its  two  "arms"  and  a  red 
cloth  around  it,  a  comb,  a  bindl  (red  spot  worn  on  forehead  by  plains 
women),  and  a  mirror  placed  at  its  foot.  Four  lamps  and  a  container 
of  grain  with  a  lamp  on  top  are  placed  in  the  shrine.  A  small  plot  on 
the  earth  floor  in  front  of  the  shrine  is  sown  in  barley.  On  the  fifth  day 
after  sowing  a  canopy  is  made  with  four  special  twigs  as  corner  posts, 
a  red  cloth  as  the  canopy,  and  a  white  cloth  as  side  curtains.  On  the 
tenth  day  the  barley  grass  is  reaped.  A  blade  or  two  is  placed  in  front 
of  each  tirsul,  and  the  rest  is  worn  by  men  who  place  it  behind  their 
ears,  and  by  women  who  place  it  in  their  hair.  Kalratra  (comprising 
four  dances  held  over  two  days),  puja,  and  goat  sacrifices  are  held. 
This  ceremony  had  last  been  held  about  a  year  before  my  presence  in 
the  village. 

Agornath 

The  crudest  god  of  all  is  Agornath.  He  is  described  as  dirty  and 
vicious.  Only  he,  of  all  the  gods,  would  dare  bother  a  new  mother  and 
infant  during  the  traditional  forty-day  postpartum  pollution  period. 
In  Sirkanda  at  present  only  Bajgis  worship  him,  though  he  is  wor- 
shiped by  other  castes  elsewhere  in  Bhatbair.  His  symbol  is  a  single 
tirsul  ( P)  illuminated  by  one  lamp  during  puja.  His  kalratra  includes 
three  dances  over  two  days  to  the  accompaniment  of  a  drum  and  a  brass 
tray  set  on  the  ground  and  beaten.  Possessed  persons  rub  their  bodies 
with  ashes  during  the  dance.  A  ram  is  the  appropriate  sacrifice  for  this 
god.  He  is  reportedly  less  worshiped  now  than  previously  and  no  puja 
had  been  given  him  for  some  time,  though  one  was  promised  for  late 
1958. 

Nag  Raja 

The  snake  king  god,  Nag  Raja,  is  worshiped  by  thirteen  Rajput 
households.  This  god  has  taken  on  many  of  the  characteristics  of  a 


APPENDIX   I  373 

village  god,  although  its  worship  is  still  specific  to  certain  households. 
At  present  only  one  villager  has  a  household  shrine  to  this  god,  and  it 
is  in  a  chan  and  is  no  longer  used.  A  blacksmith  of  Sirkanda  origin  who 
now  lives  in  Sahas  Dhara  has  such  a  shrine  in  use  in  his  house.  At  one 
time  all  who  worshiped  the  god  did  so  in  their  homes.  Now,  however, 
most  Sirkanda  devotees  of  Nag  Raja  worship  at  a  central  shrine  or 
temple  which  has  been  erected  near  the  village  and  is  known  as  a 
mandir,  as  are  the  shrines  of  village  gods. 

Worship  of  this  god  in  the  home  is  similar  to  that  for  other  house- 
hold gods.  The  shrine  is  unique  in  that  it  is  placed  not  in  a  wall  niche 
but  on  a  raised  platform  above  the  floor.  In  addition  to  a  single  tirsul, 
the  shrine  contains  a  small  flag,  a  conch-shell  horn,  a  small  drum, 
chains  for  mortification  during  possession,  an  incense  vessel,  an  oil 
lamp,  and  a  brass  tray  containing  rice,  vermilion  powder,  and  silver 
bangles.  Ideally  the  first  day  of  every  month  (sakrant  or  sankranti)  is 
celebrated  by  kalratra  and  puja  in  the  homes  of  devotees.  If  the  god 
possesses  anyone  at  the  kalratra,  a  sacrifice  follows.  Halwa  is  distrib- 
uted to  finish  the  celebration.  Actually  this  puja  is  held,  like  the  others, 
in  time  of  need  only.  Some  Sirkanda  worshipers  of  Nag  Raja  wear  gold 
earrings  or  heavy  silver  bracelets  decorated  with  images  of  snakes' 
heads  in  fulfillment  of  vows  to  honor  this  god. 

The  village  shrine  to  Nag  Raja  was  built  by  a  village  Rajput  family 
who  had  probably  been  directed  to  do  so  by  the  god.  The  head  of  this 
family  remains  the  keeper  of  this  temple.  He  presides  at  every  cere- 
mony there  and  receives  the  head  of  the  sacrificial  goat.  Worship  at  the 
shrine  sometimes  follows  kalratra  at  the  house  of  a  devotee,  or  it  may 
be  held  without  prior  dancing.  It  is  performed  about  every  three  years 
in  order  to  keep  the  god  happy,  even  if  he  is  not  tormenting  his  be- 
lievers. The  puja  and  sacrifice  at  the  temple  are  the  same  as  at  the 
household  shrine  and  are  a  substitute  for  the  latter.  At  the  annual 
Diwali  festival  the  worshipers  of  Nag  Raja  go  in  procession  to  his 
temple  and  deposit  there  a  blazing  torch  in  his  honor.  He  is  the  only 
god  to  be  so  honored. 

A  special  ceremony  involving  the  snake  is  found  widely  distributed 
in  Northern  India  in  one  form  or  another.  In  Sirkanda  it  is  performed 
to  avoid  the  displeasure  of  Nag  Raja  and  of  snakes  in  general.  If  a 
farmer  touches,  cuts,  or  kills  a  snake  with  his  plow  while  working  in  the 
fields,  he  is  supposed  to  stop  plowing  at  once  and  give  the  oxen,  the 
plow,  and  his  own  clothes  to  Bajgis.  In  addition  he  gives  the  field  away 
to  them  or,  more  frequently,  leaves  it  fallow  for  several  seasons.  There- 
after a  special  snake  puja  is  held  in  which  three  metal  snakes — one  sil- 


374  APPENDIX    I 

ver,  one  gold,  one  copper — are  worshiped,  after  which  a  number  of 
Brahmins  and  the  female  household  members  are  ceremonially  fed. 
This  ceremony  has  been  performed  by  three  or  four  Sirkanda  men. 

Dhagbairu 

One  god,  Dhagbairu,  has  so  far  appeared  in  Sirkanda  only  as  the 
god  of  incoming  brides.  This  god  now  occasionally  possesses  one  Sir- 
kanda wife,  though  it  has  never  caused  trouble  to  her  household  and 
therefore  has  not  had  a  shrine  devoted  to  it.  In  another  household  the 
god  has  caused  serious  trouble  in  a  distant  chan  and  has  begun  to  be 
worshiped  there  at  a  shrine.  The  shrine  differs  from  the  pattern  de- 
scribed above  for  household  gods.  It  is  out-of-doors,  under  a  tree.  A 
stone  rather  than  a  tirsul  symbolizes  the  god,  and  other  differences 
exist.  Kalratra,  puja,  and  sacrifice  are  held  at  this  shrine,  similar  to 
those  for  other  household  gods.  In  Sirkanda  not  much  is  known  of  this 
god. 

One  other  god,  known  only  as  Bard  Devta  (big  god),  is  worshiped 
privately  by  the  immigrant  Bajgi  in  Sirkanda.  The  god  is  apparently  a 
local  or  regional  god  of  this  man's  native  village  which  he  has  brought 
with  him.  He  has  a  small  shrine  to  Bara  Devta  in  his  home,  but  the 
god  has  never  bothered  other  villagers  and  is  of  no  concern  to  them. 

B.  Village  Gods 

The  following  gods  are  worshiped  at  public  temples  (mandir)  and 
by  the  village  at  large  rather  than  by  particular  households.  Local 
Brahmin  priests  usually  perform  the  attendant  rituals. 

Household-Like  Village  Gods 

Two  gods,  Memendia  and  Bhartwali,  each  have  shrines  located 
west  of  the  village.  When  either  is  to  be  worshiped,  kalratra,  puja,  and 
goat  sacrifice  are  held. 

MEMENDIA 

The  unique  and  memorable  thing  about  this  god  was  his  mode  of 
entry  into  the  village.  Some  thirty  or  forty  years  ago  there  was  a  great 
epidemic  in  the  plains,  apparently  plague,  which  reached  the  hills. 
A  number  of  people  in  Sirkanda  were  afflicted,  and  three  or  four  died. 
At  this  time  virtually  all  Sirkanda  villagers,  and  especially  the  young 
adults,  suddenly  showed  typical  but  exaggerated  symptoms  of  super- 
natural possession — they  began  to  laugh  hysterically,  dance,  shout,  and 


APPENDIX   I  375 

speak  nonsense.  Their  heads  were  turned  to  one  side,  and  they  shook 
violently.  They  shouted  for  drummers  to  come  "make  us  dance."  The 
drummers  came  and  the  people  danced  until  they  were  exhausted, 
slept  where  they  fell,  and  danced  again.  The  dancing  went  on  for 
three  or  four  days.  The  unaffected  villagers  recognized  at  once  that 
this  was  possession  by  a  supernatural  being,  but  they  had  never  before 
seen  it  on  such  a  mass  scale  nor  did  they  connect  it  at  once  with  the  ill- 
ness and  fear  of  illness  in  the  village.  When  the  possessed  people  were 
asked  who  they  were  and  what  they  wanted,  some  answered  that  they 
were  possessed  by  Memendia,  a  god  who  had  never  been  in  Sirkanda 
before.  They  were  told  to  erect  a  temple  under  a  tree  west  of  the  vil- 
lage, place  tirsuls  there,  and  perform  a  puja  in  his  honor.  The  villagers 
promised  to  carry  out  his  instructions,  and  at  once  the  god  left  them. 
The  temple  was  then  set  up  and  the  puja  held  under  the  direction  of 
the  local  Brahmin.  At  the  same  time  those  suffering  from  the  plague 
were  cured,  and  no  more  died.  Apparently  this  god  similarly  afflicted 
other  Pahari  villages  at  about  the  same  time  with  similar  results. 

Usually  possession  under  these  circumstances  affects  an  individual 
rather  than  a  group,  and  it  is  attributed  to  ghosts  or  spirits  rather  than 
to  gods.  Memendia  is  the  only  god  who  regularly  possesses  people  be- 
fore the  drumming.  He  possesses  and  then  demands  the  drums,  whereas 
other  gods  are  attracted  by  drums  to  come  and  possess  people.  Since  his 
original  appearance,  this  god  has  caused  very  little  trouble  and  has 
therefore  received  little  worship.  Occasionally  an  individual  villager, 
one  in  particular,  has  been  possessed  by  him.  Then  the  drummers  are 
called,  the  god  speaks,  and  a  sacrifice  is  offered.  The  last  time  he  was 
worshiped  was  about  15  years  ago.  His  shrine  now  consists  of  an  un- 
distinguished stone  at  the  base  of  which  are  three  tirsuls  and  a  few 
remnants  of  offerings.  The  tree  under  which  it  was  originally  placed 
has  long  since  disappeared. 

BHARTWALI 

The  temple  to  Bhartwali  consists  of  a  rectangular  stone  enclosure 
open  at  one  end,  about  four  by  six  feet  and  three  feet  high.  It  was  built 
in  honor  of  Bharat,  brother  of  Ram  in  the  Ramayana,  by  the  Sirkanda 
Brahmin  family  who  are  still  its  temple  keepers.  The  Brahmins  offer 
a  puja  and  goat  sacrifice  there  about  every  five  years,  and  occasionally 
the  village  at  large  does  so,  allegedly  at  the  Brahmins'  urging,  "just  for 
protection."  This  was  last  done  about  three  years  ago,  but  interest  in 
the  god  has  dropped  to  a  very  low  ebb.  He  has  possessed  no  one  and 
troubled  no  one  for  a  long  time.  One  villager  predicted  that  there  will 
never  again  be  an  offering  made  to  Bhartwali  in  Sirkanda.  In  former 


376  APPENDIX    I 

days  a  goat  was  sacrificed  here,  as  at  most  other  village  temples,  after 
the  rain  ceremony,  but  the  practice  has  long  been  abandoned.  Now  if 
anyone  thinks  at  all  about  this  god  it  is  the  Brahmin  keeper  of  the 
temple  and  his  family.  Presumably  Bhartwali  could  be  on  the  way  to 
becoming  a  household  god,  after  beginning  as  a  village  god.  More  likely 
he  will  disappear  from  the  scene  altogether. 

Raghunath 

The  only  temple  in  Sirkanda  that  is  a  real  building  is  that  to 
Raghunath,  equated  by  some  villagers  to  Mahasu,  who  in  turn  is  often 
identified  as  Mahadev  or  Shiva.  More  commonly  Raghunath  is  con- 
sidered by  educated  people  to  be  Ram  Chandra,  a  manifestation  of 
Vishnu.  In  this  form  Raghunath  is  honored  at  a  well-known  temple  in 
Deoprayag.  The  Raghunath  temple  in  Sirkanda  consists  of  a  small  and 
simplified  reproduction  of  the  standard  two-story  village  house,  about 
eight  by  twelve  feet,  with  a  door  opening  to  each  floor.  It  is  white- 
washed and  roofed  with  corrugated  iron.  The  lower  floor  is  used  to 
store  anything  belonging  to  the  temple,  for  example,  a  goat  donated 
for  sacrifice.  The  upper  floor  is  the  shrine  containing  the  items  used 
in  puja  (bells,  conch,  utensils)  and  items  in  honor  of  the  god,  including 
the  ceremonial  flyswitch,  several  chatar  (hanging  umbrella-shaped  ob- 
jects of  cloth  with  silver  fringe),  and  two  iron  staves  four  or  five  feet 
in  length.  This  temple  was  built  by  a  Rajput  family  of  Sirkanda  about 
sixty  years  ago.  They  control  and  maintain  it  and  are  its  keepers 
(pujaris).  The  Raghunath  temple  is  the  most  sacred  and  restrictive  of 
the  Sirkanda  temples.  Low  castes  must  worship  from  afar,  and  aliens 
are  kept  away  from  it  unless  they  have  come  to  worship.  Shoes  are  re- 
moved in  its  vicinity,  and  it  is  opened  only  for  special  worship.  If  a 
stranger  asks  for  the  village  temple,  this  is  the  one  that  will  be  pointed 
out. 

Its  most  important  use  is  at  the  time  of  marriage.  When  a  village  boy 
or  girl  is  married  or  when  any  outside  wedding  party  passes  Sirkanda, 
they  detour  to  this  temple  where  the  bride  or  groom  makes  an  offering 
and  is  blessed  by  the  pujari.  If  this  ceremony  is  neglected,  the  wrath  of 
Raghunath  will  descend  upon  the  couple,  whereas  if  it  is  performed, 
he  will  protect  them  and  ensure  the  success  of  the  marriage. 

Other  occasions  upon  which  this  god  is  honored  are  similar  to  those 
of  worship  of  household  gods.  The  household  of  the  temple  keeper 
and  one  other  family  occasionally  hold  kalratra  and  puja  for  Raghu- 
nath at  this  temple  to  alleviate  suffering  at  his  hands.  At  such  times 
he  possesses  people  much  as  do  household  gods.  Other  families  oc- 
casionally make  vows  to  this  god,  and  if  their  wishes  are  fulfilled  they 


APPENDIX   I  377 

carry  out  the  vows,  either  with  a  cash  donation  to  the  temple  or  a  puja 
and  sacrifice  at  the  temple  with  the  pujari  officiating.  At  village-wide 
kalratras  on  any  occasion  Raghunath  is  likely  to  possess  a  particular 
person  (in  Sirkanda  this  person  is  a  Rajput  woman)  much  as  Devi 
does.  He  may  also  be  honored  with  a  kalratra  by  the  village  at  large  on 
almost  any  occasion  when  powerful  help  is  felt  to  be  needed.  This 
temple  is  the  only  one  which  attracts  outsiders  to  worship  in  Sirkanda. 
Occasionally  (once  in  my  year  of  residence)  someone  of  Pahari  descent 
will  come  from  as  far  away  as  the  valley  to  make  or  fulfill  a  vow  at  this 
temple.  Then  the  temple  keeper  keeps  the  person  as  his  guest  and  re- 
ceives the  offerings.  More  frequently  people  from  neighboring  villages 
come  to  use  this  temple. 

In  association  with  Raghunath  are  two  gods,  Parasu  Ram  and  Bhairu, 
images  of  which  are  said  to  be  just  inside  the  door  of  his  temples.  Parasu 
Ram  is  an  incarnation  of  Vishnu,  according  to  the  great  tradition. 
Bhairu  is  identifiable  as  Bhairo,  Shiva's  chief  executive  officer.  He  is 
often  worshiped  separately  in  Pahari  villages  at  a  shrine  identified  by 
a  rounded  stone  similar  to  that  indicating  a  Devi  temple  site.  Such  a 
shrine  exists  in  a  village  close  to  Sirkanda.  This  is  further  evidence  of 
the  lack  of  clear-cut  distinction  between  gods  identified  with  Shiva  and 
those  identified  with  Vishnu  in  this  area.  Bhairu  is  also  the  patron  for 
practitioners  of  the  art  of  casting  spells  and  counterspells.  He  is  wor- 
shiped privately  by  such  people  to  assure  his  continued  protection. 

Children's  God 

Lhesania  is  a  god  connected  with  the  local  celebration  of  spring, 
known  as  Phul  Dalna  (flower  placing)  and  Popria  Sakrant  (see  Appen- 
dix II).  He  is  worshiped  by  children,  who  are  the  primary  participants 
in  these  ceremonies,  and  he  is  worshiped  only  at  the  time  of  the  latter 
ceremony.  He  never  possesses  anyone  or  makes  his  presence  felt.  His 
shrine  is  a  stone  in  a  field  near  the  village.  Its  location  may  vary  from 
year  to  year  because  it  is  determined  by  children,  who  select  it  just 
before  the  ceremony  each  year.  At  the  yearly  ceremony  the  god  is 
honored  with  offerings  of  flowers,  flags,  and  food. 

Agricultural  Gods 

The  two  following  deities  are  worshiped  almost  exclusively  as  an 
aid  to  crop  production. 

MATRI 

The  crest  of  the  hill  upon  the  flank  of  which  Sirkanda  and  its  fields 
lie  is  known  as  Matrl  kd  ddnda  (mother  goddess  peak).  On  this  peak, 


378  APPENDIX    I 

1,200  feet  above  Sirkanda  and  somewhat  difficult  of  access,  is  a  small 
U-shaped  stone  enclosure  which  is  the  temple  honoring  this  deity.  In 
it  are  a  grain-pounding  pestle  and  the  remains  of  many  small  offerings 
appropriate  to  a  goddess,  such  as  coins,  bangles,  mirrors,  combs,  and 
lamps.  There  is  some  confusion  as  to  whether  this  goddess  is  singular 
or  plural.  Atkinson  (1884b,  pp.  75  f.)  lists  sixteen  Matris  or  "divine 
mothers"  who  are  widely  worshiped  under  this  and  other  names  in 
India,  Nepal,  and  Tibet  by  the  "aboriginal  and  non-Aryan  tribes." 
He  describes  the  goddesses  as  unrelated  to  the  worship  of  "female 
energy"  or  of  the  "consort  of  the  great  divinities"  of  contemporary 
Hinduism.  It  is  to  one  of  these  (or  possibly  to  a  personification  of  all 
of  them)  that  the  Matri  shrine  in  Sirkanda  is  evidently  devoted.  The 
Bhatbair  village  of  Kanda  has  a  shrine  to  a  sister  goddess  of  Matri 
(perhaps  one  of  the  other  sixteen  Matris),  according  to  Sirkanda  resi- 
dents, but  otherwise  they  know  little  about  her. 

Closely  associated  with  the  shrine,  and  resident  on  the  same  hilltop, 
is  a  band  of  sprites  or  fairies  referred  to  as  matris  (matriya)  (see  p.  113). 
Such  beings  frequently  occupy  hilltops  in  the  Pahari  area.  The  relation- 
ship between  the  sprites  and  the  Matri  goddess  or  goddesses  is  unclear 
to  villagers,  possibly  because  both  occupy  the  same  location  and  have 
therefore  become  identified,  whereas  there  is  apparently  no  necessary 
connection  between  them.  Contributing  to  the  ambiguity  is  the  con- 
fusion between  Matri  as  a  single  goddess,  as  Sirkanda  villagers  view 
her,  or  as  sixteen  goddesses,  as  she  is  known  elsewhere  in  the  Himalayas. 
The  latter  perhaps  merges  into  the  idea  of  the  band  of  fairies  in  the 
view  of  Sirkanda  villagers. 

Worship  is  offered  at  the  Matri  shrine  in  Sirkanda  at  the  beginning 
of  a  variety  of  undertakings,  much  as  Atkinson  has  described  for  Matri 
elsewhere  in  the  hills,  but  especially  in  association  with  agricultural 
rites.  Ideally,  as  soon  as  harvesting  and  threshing  are  completed  each 
season,  Sirkanda  villagers  come  as  a  group  to  this  shrine,  where  a  puja 
is  held  under  a  Brahmin's  supervision  and  a  goat  is  sacrificed  in  honor 
of  the  goddess,  to  show  appreciation  for  the  crops  and  to  ensure  suc- 
cessful future  crops.  In  conjunction  with  this  ceremony  a  similar  one 
is  held  at  the  shrine  of  the  earth  god,  Bhuia,  described  below.  Neither 
of  these  rites  has  been  held  in  recent  years. 

If  rains  are  either  too  heavy  or  too  light  for  good  crops,  a  puja  may 
be  held  at  both  of  these  shrines  and  often  at  the  shrine  of  Devi  as  well. 
Usually  the  Pandavas,  Raghunath,  and  (in  former  days)  Bhartwali  re- 
ceive goat  sacrifices  in  their  honor  after  the  rain  puja,  though  these  are 
intended  to  show  respect  for  their  power  only,  and  are  not  an  integral 
part  of  the  ceremony.  The  difficulty  of  reaching  Matri's  shrine  has  per- 


APPENDIX    I  379 

haps  been  a  factor  in  the  recent  trend  to  omit  her  from  inclusion  in  the 
rain  puja,  and  may  be  partially  responsible  for  cessation  of  the  harvest 
puja. 

Matri  is  also  honored  by  hunters  who  want  to  ensure  success  in 
getting  game.  A  hunter  goes  to  her  shrine  and  leaves  a  small  offering 
before  setting  out. 

BHUIA 

Immediately  above  Sirkanda  is  a  large  oak  tree  near  which  are  the 
temples  to  Bhuia  (the  earth  god),  Devi,  the  shrine  for  Nar  Singh,  and 
the  repository  for  the  cremation  stones  of  high-caste  dead  (map  3). 
Bhuia  is  thought  of  as  the  god  of  the  soil  and  its  products.  His  temple 
consists  of  a  stone  under  which  tirsuls  have  been  placed.  He  is  wor- 
shiped both  independently  and  in  conjunction  with  Matri  at  harvest 
time.  Bhuia  is  also  worshiped  in  conjunction  with  either  Matri  or  Devi 
in  the  rain  puja.  He,  like  Matri,  is  never  given  a  puja  unless  one  is  also 
being  given  to  the  other  agricultural  deity.  In  the  village  Bhuia  is  an 
old  god  whose  origin  and  affiliations  are  unknown  to  his  worshipers. 
As  an  earth  god  he  is  well  known  on  the  plains.  The  hill  villagers  say 
his  temple  is  to  be  found  in  many  villages,  always  located  under  a  tree 
and  often  near  a  Devi  temple. 

Paramount  Village  Gods 

Two  gods,  Devi  and  the  Pandavas,  are  of  greater  village-wide  im- 
portance than  any  others. 

DEVI 

The  goddess  known  simply  as  Devi  (goddess)  is  honored  in  several 
contexts  in  Sirkanda.  She  is  a  manifestation  of  Durga,  the  divine  female 
or  mother  goddess.  Her  temple  is  a  stone  enclosure,  roofed  over  loosely 
with  branches  and  located  at  the  base  of  the  large  oak  tree  near  the 
village  which  is  the  site  of  several  village  shrines.  Her  powers  are  varied, 
but  important  among  them  is  her  function  as  a  deity  of  earth  produc- 
tivity, along  with  the  two  gods  just  described.  When  the  harvest  cere- 
mony is  held,  she  is  one  of  the  deities  honored. 

She  is  the  focus  of  the  rain  ceremony  at  present.  This  ceremony, 
known  simply  as  Manana  (to  please),  is  held  whenever  the  weather 
threatens  to  harm  crops — usually  late  in  a  harsh  dry  season  or  a  harsh 
rainy  season.  It  consists  of  a  kalratra  held  near  Devi's  temple,  a  puja 
under  the  direction  of  the  local  Brahmin,  and  a  sacrifice  to  Devi.  The 
sacrifice  is  usually  a  goat,  but  it  may  be  a  coconut  instead.  Each  fam- 
ily attending  brings  a  container  holding  seven  grains,  which  is  circled 


380  APPENDIX    I 

over  the  head  of  each  family  member  to  bless  them  and  remove  any 
evil  that  may  be  in  them.  Then  the  grain  is  thrown  over  the  temple 
and  surrounding  area.  Food  is  then  cooked  and  distributed  among  the 
participants.  In  former  days  goats  were  also  sacrificed  to  Matri  and 
Bhuia,  and  pujas  were  held  at  their  shrines  as  part  of  the  ceremony; 
the  next  morning  additional  dances  might  be  held  at  the  Pandava 
temple  and  the  Raghunath  temple,  and  goats  were  often  sacrificed  there 
as  well  as  at  Bhartwali's  temple.  Such  rites  were  in  honor  of  these 
powerful  gods  but  were  not  part  of  the  rain  ceremony  itself.  It  has 
been  the  custom  to  purchase  the  sacrificial  animals  and  the  distributed 
food  by  village-wide  subscription.  Now  it  is  said  that  people  are  not 
interested  and  will  not  contribute.  Only  a  few  households  who  own 
land  and  chans  in  one  area  immediately  east  of  the  village  are  enthusi- 
astic about  the  rites  now.  They  participate  as  a  group  and  give  their 
offerings  together,  whereas  others  participate  only  in  the  enjoyable 
kalratra  portion  of  the  proceedings.  When  this  rite  was  performed 
during  my  stay  in  the  village,  the  Devi  temple  was  the  site  of  the  en- 
tire evening's  proceedings  and  of  the  only  sacrifice — of  a  coconut.  The 
following  day  dances  were  held  at  the  Pandava  and  Raghunath  temples. 
The  ceremony  did  not  produce  significant  results,  but  many  people 
expected  this  outcome  because  of  the  niggardly  attitude  of  most  house- 
holds and  the  resultant  paucity  of  sacrifices. 

Apparently  the  harvest  ceremony  was  virtually  identical  wth  the 
rain  ceremony  in  the  days  when  it  was  held.  At  kalratras  associated 
with  these  ceremonies,  as  at  those  for  the  Pandavas  and  Raghunath, 
villagers  are  likely  to  be  possessed  by  any  of  the  village  gods.  Such  pos- 
session is  only  for  the  pleasure  of  the  gods  concerned.  They  do  not 
usually  talk  or  make  demands,  nor  do  they  overexert  those  in  whom 
they  dance. 

Devi  is  typical  of  the  village  gods  who  possess  people  on  such  oc- 
casions. Possession  by  Devi,  as  by  other  village  gods,  is  of  a  different 
order  than  that  by  household  gods.  She  does  not  possess  indiscrimi- 
nately. Rather,  she  possesses  only  a  certain  person.  Presently  in  Sirkanda 
this  person  is  the  barber's  wife.  For  three  generations — since  Devi  first 
possessed  the  barber's  grandmother  during  a  cholera  epidemic  and 
saved  the  village — she  has  possessed  a  female  member  of  this  family. 
The  family  maintains  a  household  shrine  to  her  as  a  result.  This  is  the 
only  instance  in  the  village  of  a  household  shrine  to  a  village  god. 
According  to  villagers,  if  no  suitable  woman  of  barber  caste  were  in 
the  village  she  would  possess  someone  else,  not  necessarily  of  low  caste. 

Everyone  in  the  village  honors  Devi.  Kalratras  and  pujas  may  be  held 
for  her  at  her  temple  or  at  the  Pandava  temple  whenever  someone 


APPENDIX   I  381 

wishes  to  ask  questions  of  her.  The  worship  closely  resembles  that  for 
household  gods,  though  local  Bajgis  play  the  accompanying  drums 
and  the  pujari  is  the  highly  esteemed  Brahmin,  Har  Nam,  who  offici- 
ates in  many  ceremonies  for  high-caste  people  but  not  in  those  of  house- 
hold gods.  Devi  also  participates  in  the  ceremony  dedicated  to  the 
Pandavas,  described  below.  Devi  is  one  of  the  deities  who  appears  at 
almost  every  village-wide  kalratra  no  matter  in  whose  honor  it  is  being 
given.  In  this  respect  she  is  like  the  Pandavas  and  Raghunath  and 
unlike  other  deities. 

Devi  is  known  and  honored  throughout  the  Pahari  area,  but  only 
one  other  village  in  Bhatbair  has  a  temple  for  her.  The  largest  temple 
on  the  40-mile  Mussoorie-Tehri  trail,  surmounting  the  highest  peak 
along  the  trail,  is  a  temple  to  Devi  at  Kuddu  Kal.  It  is  the  most  honored 
temple  in  this  region  of  Tehri  Garhwal.  According  to  some  villagers 
the  Devi  of  the  other  temple  is  a  sister  to  the  Sirkanda  one,  but  accord- 
ing to  others  the  Kuddu  Kal  temple  is  dedicated  to  her  head  while 
the  Sirkanda  one  is  to  an  arm.  Sirkanda  villagers  often  visit  the  Kuddu 
Kal  Devi  during  an  annual  fair  held  there.  Coconuts  are  offered  to  her 
there.  A  former  pujari  of  that  temple  is  said  to  have  objected  to  the 
great  slaughter  of  goats  that  had  taken  place,  and  he  proclaimed  the 
substitution  of  coconuts  as  suitable  sacrifice. 

The  story  of  the  founding  of  the  Kuddu  Kal  temple  at  the  insistence 
of  Devi  herself,  who  appeared  incognito  as  a  young  woman  in  distress, 
is  well  known  to  villagers.  Also  it  is  known  that  a  sacred  stone  (bindi) 
representing  Devi  determined  the  precise  spot  for  the  temple.  Another 
popular  story  is  that  of  a  blacksmith  (allegedly  a  maternal  relative  of 
the  Sirkanda  blacksmiths)  who  responded  to  an  appeal  made  by  Devi  in 
a  dream,  to  remove  a  thorn  from  the  foot  of  her  mount,  a  tiger.  In 
reward  the  blacksmith  was  granted  a  large  tract  of  land  by  the  Raja 
of  Garhwal,  and  he  became  wealthy.  The  goddess  attained  such  renown 
that  the  income  at  her  temple  was  great  enough  to  finance  the  building 
of  the  present  imposing  structure  in  that  remote  spot.  It  is  believed 
that  Devi  still  rides  her  tiger  in  the  vicinity  of  all  temples  in  her  honor, 
including  that  at  Sirkanda.  Thus,  Devi  is  an  important  goddess  in  the 
Hinduism  of  this  entire  region. 

PANDAVAS 

The  most  honored  deity  or  complex  of  deities  in  Sirkanda,  and 
as  important  as  Devi  and  Mahasu  in  Bhatbair  and  the  surrounding 
Pahari  region,  are  the  five  Pandava  brothers,  whose  story  is  told  in  the 
Hindu  religious  epic,  the  Mahabharata.  These  deified  culture  heroes 
are  reputed  to  have  lived  for  many  years  in  the  hill  area  of  Kedarkhand, 


382  APPENDIX    I 

latterly  known  as  Garhwal.  The  villagers'  feeling  of  respect  and  ad- 
miration for  the  Pandavas  is  derived  from  a  long  and  close  association 
quite  different  from  the  vague  feeling  they  have  developed  for  most 
other  Hindu  deities  and  heroes  as  a  result  of  hearing  about  them  from 
traveling  priests  and  mendicants.  The  Pandavas  may  well  be  indigenous 
objects  of  worship  in  this  area  who  have  been  universalized  to  become 
a  part  of  the  literary  tradition  of  Hinduism.  In  most  other  areas  they 
are  not  considered  to  be  gods.  Every  village  in  the  Pahari  region  has 
its  shrine  to  the  Pandavas,  and  every  villager  honors  them.  In  Sirkanda 
the  descendants  of  one  man  who  was  an  especially  devoted  follower  of 
the  Pandavas  are  still  identified  in  that  light,  though  they  comprise 
eight  households  now.  The  Pandava  brothers  are  known  in  Sirkanda 
as  Yudarshter  (Yudhishthira),  Bhim  (Bhima),  Arjan  (Arjuna),  Nikul 
(Nakula),  and  Sedev  (Sahadeva).  They  are  worshiped  as  a  group.  In 
addition,  their  common  wife  Dropti  (Draupadi)  is  included  in  wor- 
ship, as  well  as  a  second  wife,  not  mentioned  in  the  Mahabharata,  but 
known  here  as  Basudunta. 

The  Pandavas'  temple  in  Sirkanda  and  other  nearby  villages  con- 
sists of  a  small  stone  platform  against  the  side  of  a  village  house.  On 
this  platform  is  a  stone  altar  upon  which  are  kept  a  tirsul  representing 
the  gods,  and  the  wooden  maces,  bow,  and  iron  staves  representing 
the  weapons  used  by  these  gods  in  their  epic  battle,  and  used  during 
worship  by  the  dancers  they  possess.  Near  the  temple  or  mandir  is  a 
small  square  house  known  as  the  Pandavas'  chaurl  (umbrella,  shelter). 
It  is  used  as  the  place  of  worship  or  puja  room  for  the  presiding  Brah- 
min and  the  storage  place  for  his  ceremonial  apparatus  during  im- 
portant ceremonies.  In  many  villages  a  convenient  room  in  a  house  is 
used  instead.  Finally,  there  is  an  open,  flat  area  adjacent  to  the  mandir 
and  chauri  which  is  called  a  madan  ("stage").  This  is  the  site  for 
village-wide  worship  and  dancing  in  honor  of  the  Pandavas.  It  is  also 
a  gathering  place  for  social  occasions  not  directly  related  to  their  wor- 
ship. It  is  the  ceremonial  center  of  village  life  and  the  site  of  most 
village  dances. 

The  Pandavas  are  worshiped  on  five  major  occasions:  (1)  when 
there  is  trouble  that  they  may  be  able  to  relieve,  or  when  a  vow  has 
been  made  to  them  on  such  an  occasion,  (2)  at  the  annual  Diwali  festival, 
(3)  at  the  annual  Navratra  observance,  (4)  at  the  occasional  performance 
of  the  Mundkile  ceremony  reinforcing  village  solidarity  and  security, 
and  (5)  after  the  performance  of  a  rain  or  crop  ceremony.  In  addition, 
dances  may  be  held  at  the  madan  at  the  time  of  weddings  or  any  other 
village  celebration.  No  case  was  recorded  in  which  they  were  thought 
to  have  punished  people  for  failure  to  worship. 


APPENDIX    I  383 

Worship  of  the  Pandavas  is  much  like  that  for  other  gods:  a  kalratra 
is  held,  followed  by  a  puja,  sacrifice  of  a  goat,  and  distribution  of  halwa. 
Ideally  a  number  of  people  become  possessed  by  various  village  gods  at 
dances  honoring  the  Pandavas.  Possession  occurs  with  such  regularity 
that  villagers  admit  that  feigned  cases  far  outnumber  those  of  "real" 
possession.  Such  possession  is  almost  invariably  for  the  pleasure  of  the 
gods  involved  and  does  not  produce  a  session  in  which  people  hear 
the  gods'  demands  or  seek  their  advice.  In  any  event,  five  men — not 
always  the  same  five  but  in  recent  years  always  Rajputs — become  pos- 
sessed by  the  five  Pandavas  and  dance  with  the  symbolic  weapons  kept 
at  the  shrine.  One  Rajput  woman,  who  is  regularly  possessed  by  Dropti, 
their  wife,  performs  a  stereotyped  dance  with  a  tray  of  rice  revolving 
in  one  hand  and  a  cup  in  the  other.  Another  Rajput  woman  becomes 
possessed  by  Basudunta,  the  second  wife  of  the  Pandavas.  A  Bajgi  and 
his  wife  become  possessed  by  Kali  Das  and  Kali,  a  god  and  goddess  as- 
sociated with  the  forces  of  evil  against  which  the  Pandavas  fought, 
according  to  villagers  (other  interpretations  might  be  given  by  more 
educated  Hindus).  The  possession  is  not  random  and  shifting,  as  with 
household  gods.  Other  villagers  traditionally  become  possessed  by  gods 
not  closely  or  not  at  all  linked  with  the  Pandavas  in  mythology  but 
linked  in  the  minds  of  villagers  to  this  puja.  The  barber's  wife  becomes 
possessed  by  Devi,  a  Bajgi  man  becomes  possessed  by  Blr  (identified  as 
a  relative  of  Devi),  and  a  Rajput  woman  is  possessed  by  Raghunath. 
If  any  other  village  god  possesses  people,  it  is  likely  to  do  so  at  the  time 
the  Pandavas  are  worshiped.  At  any  one  moment  some  or  all  of  these 
gods  may  be  dancing,  but  ideally  sometime  during  the  kalratra  each 
makes  an  appearance.  In  reality  it  often  happens  that  only  a  few  of 
the  gods  appear,  and  on  some  occasions  none  appear.  Depending  upon 
its  purpose,  the  dancing  may  or  may  not  be  accompanied  by  a  puja 
and  sacrifice,  but  in  any  event  it  honors  the  Pandavas  and  their  as- 
sociates and,  to  a  lesser  extent,  other  village  gods. 

The  Mundkile  ceremony  is  an  elaborate  affair,  the  immediate  aim 
of  which  is  to  protect  the  village  by  excluding  malevolent  ghosts  and 
alien  gods.  It  is  a  form  of  boundary  rite  (cf.  Crooke's  discussion  of 
boundary  rites,  1926,  pp.  83  ff.).  Since  it  is  of  such  importance  to  the 
community  as  a  whole,  in  contrast  to  the  rites  of  household  gods,  and 
since  it  differs  considerably  from  the  routine  worship  of  the  Pandavas 
in  other  circumstances,  it  will  be  described  here. 

The  ceremony  is  held  every  five  to  eight  years  or  whenever  the  need 
is  felt,  usually  in  the  period  October  through  December,  after  the 
autumn  harvest.  It  is  usually  financed  by  village  subscription,  though 
in  some  circumstances  a  well-to-do  family  may  sponsor  it. 


384  APPENDIX    I 

The  first  step  is  a  hariali  ceremony — the  planting  and  reaping  of 
barley.  All  villagers  contribute  a  half-seer  (one  pound)  of  barley  to 
be  planted  or  used  in  offering,  and  when  it  is  reaped  all  get  shoots  of 
barley  to  place  on  the  doors  of  their  houses  as  blessing,  and  some  of  the 
soil  in  which  it  grew  to  spread  on  their  fields.  This  is  similar  to  the 
ceremony  of  the  same  name  described  above  for  Gauril. 

Each  night  for  eight  nights  during  the  growth  period  of  the  barley, 
a  kalratra  is  held  at  the  madan.  On  the  last  night  the  Mundkile  cere- 
mony and  the  Pandavas'  puja  are  held.  On  the  evening  of  the  Mund- 
kile ceremony  the  officiating  Brahmin  goes  with  some  villagers  and 
affiixes  a  peg  (to  which  the  name  of  this  ceremony  refers)  at  each  of  the 
four  directional  corners  of  the  occupied  area  of  the  village.  He  pours 
some  liquor  at  each  peg  and  sacrifices  a  pig,  a  ram,  a  cock,  and  a  pump- 
kin, one  at  each  of  the  four  corners.  As  he  does  so  he  entreats  the 
Pandavas  and  their  wives  and  Devi  and  Kali  to  protect  the  village 
from  alien  spirits  and  evil  of  all  sorts.  Then  the  villagers  return  to  the 
madan,  where  the  final  kalratra  is  held.  Late  in  the  night,  after  Dropti, 
wife  of  the  Pandavas,  has  possessed  some  village  woman,  a  goat  is  sac- 
rificed at  the  madan  in  her  honor.  Immediately  thereafter  a  second 
goat  is  sacrificed  to  Basudunta,  second  wife  of  the  Pandavas.  The  next 
morning,  after  the  reaping  and  distribution  of  the  barley  which  com- 
pletes the  hariali,  another  goat  is  sacrificed  in  the  puja  room  used  for 
the  hariali — this  one  in  honor  of  Devi.  A  coconut,  which  has  formed 
part  of  the  sacred  apparatus  in  the  hariali,  is  also  offered  to  Devi  at 
this  time.  Thereafter  goats  may  be  sacrificed  at  the  shrines  of  Raghu- 
nath  and  Bhairu  if  these  are  present  in  the  village  (Sirkanda  has  only 
the  former). 

The  hariali  portion  of  the  ceremony  is  evidently  performed  in  honor 
of  Devi,  but  she  and  all  the  Pandavas  are  asked  to  protect  the  village. 
One  informant  from  a  nearby  village  attributed  the  whole  performance 
to  the  honor  of  Durga,  the  female  deity  or  mother  goddess  with  whom 
Devi  is  probably  best  identified.  Most  villagers  do  not  identify  Devi 
with  the  name  Durga,  but  they  recognize  the  significant  role  of  Devi 
in  this  ceremony.  However,  the  over-all  village  attitude  is  that  this  is  a 
Pando  ki  puja — a  ceremony  for  the  Pandavas.  In  this  ceremony  we  have 
further  evidence  of  the  interrelation  of  these  village  gods  and  their 
distinctness  from  household  gods,  with  which  they  are  never  confused. 
Household  gods  do  not  appear  during  worship  of  village  gods. 

In  most  villages  in  Bhatbair  a  male  buffalo  is  sacrificed  to  climax 
the  Mundkile  ceremony,  though  Sirkanda  residents  deny  that  they  do 
the  killing  themselves.  The  ceremony  is  dedicated  to  the  Pandavas, 
Dropti,  Basudunta,  Devi,  and  Kali.  The  buffalo  is  led  around  the  vil- 


APPENDIX   I  385 

lage  while  drums  play.  Then  it  is  fed  fine  foods  while  standing  in  a 
circle  drawn  on  the  ground.  Rice  is  thrown  on  the  buffalo  to  the 
accompaniment  of  mantras  chanted  by  the  Brahmin.  When  the  buffalo 
shakes,  signifying  that  the  gods  have  accepted  it  as  an  offering,  a  village 
elder  (usually  the  sayana)  strikes  it  with  a  sword  in  an  effort  to  behead 
it.  Thus  far  the  details  of  sacrifice  are  identical  to  those  of  the  goat 
that  has  been  sacrificed  previously  in  this  ceremony.  If  the  buffalo  were 
felled  in  a  single  blow  it  would  be  a  very  good  omen;  if  it  were  to  run 
away  and  escape  it  would  be  a  very  bad  omen.  Neither  actually  occurs. 
The  buffalo  is  invariably  wounded,  onlookers  join  in  hacking  the 
tendons  of  its  legs  so  that  it  will  not  escape,  and  eventually  it  is  hacked 
to  death.  It  is  then  dragged  to  the  madan,  where  more  mantras  are 
chanted  over  it.  Thereafter  it  is  reportedly  given  to  shoemakers,  who 
use  the  hide  and  eat  the  flesh.  A  goat  is  then  offered  to  the  same  gods. 
The  sayana  holds  it  and  then  throws  it  over  his  shoulder,  and  someone 
else  kills  it  when  it  hits  the  ground.  Its  meat  is  distributed  to  all  as- 
sembled. Thereupon  the  sayana  is  possessed,  shivering  from  terror 
at  having  killed  a  buffalo,  apparently  a  ritually  dangerous  act.  He  is 
covered  with  a  blanket  and  taken  into  the  puja  room  until  he  is  re- 
covered. It  is  not  clear  what  possesses  him  at  this  time,  but  a  blanket 
is  a  standard  protection  against  ghosts,  and  it  may  be  that  he  is  vul- 
nerable to  their  attack  after  performing  this  act. 

Buffalo  sacrifice  may  also  be  given  the  Pandavas  in  fulfillment  of 
vows.  The  most  recent  buffalo  sacrifice  in  the  Bhatbair  area  occurred 
in  a  Mundkile  ceremony  three  years  previous  to  my  stay  there.  Ac- 
tually two  were  then  sacrificed,  as  two  disputing  factions  were  unable 
to  agree  on  the  matter.  The  Mundkile  and  associated  ceremonies  took 
place  without  buffalo  sacrifice  in  a  nearby  village  during  my  residence, 
and  in  Sirkanda  about  three  years  previously. 

MAHASU,    MAHADEV 

The  god  Mahasu,  who  is  well  known  in  the  area,  is  described  by 
some  Sirkanda  villagers  as  identical  with  Mahadev,  who  in  turn  is 
identical  with  Shiva.  In  Jaunsar-Bawar,  Mahasu  is  a  distinct  god,  or 
more  accurately  four  gods  (Saksena,  1955,  pp.  40  ff.). 

Mahasu,  though  sometimes  identified  with  Shiva,  is  not  honored 
under  this  name  on  Shiva's  birthday.  Those  inclined  to  such  worship 
go  to  a  large  Shiva  temple  at  Sahas  Dhara  or  elsewhere  where  a  full- 
time  Brahmin  priest  is  in  charge.  At  one  of  these  distant  Shiva  temples 
Sirkanda  villagers  occasionally  have  a  Brahmin  perform  the  special 
worship  in  their  behalf  called  japp  (repetition)  during  the  sacred  month 
of  Saon  (July-August)  to  secure  relief  from  chronic  difficulties. 


386  APPENDIX    I 

Many  villages  are  devoted  above  all  to  Mahasu  or  Mahadev  just  as 
Sirkanda  is  to  Devi  and  the  Pandavas.  Mahadev  is  said  to  have  special 
power  to  return  illegally  acquired  lands  or  houses  to  their  rightful 
owners.  The  rightful  owner  simply  takes  a  clod  or  stone  from  the  land 
or  house  in  question,  tells  Mahasu  the  circumstances,  and  asks  re- 
venge on  the  illegal  possessor.  Then  the  occupant  must  leave,  or  he 
will  die  under  the  power  of  the  god.  In  the  past  this  god,  identified 
as  Shiva,  and  his  wife  Parbati,  have  been  honored  in  the  spectacular 
and  elaborate  rope-sliding  ceremony  peculiar  to  the  Himalayas.  Since 
this  ceremony  has  been  described  in  detail  elsewhere  (Berreman,  1961b), 
it  can  be  passed  over  lightly  here. 

The  feat  which  forms  the  focus  of  this  ceremony  is  performed  by  a 
person  of  the  Beda  caste,  a  caste  of  dancers  and  entertainers  indigenous 
to  these  hills.  Ideally  it  used  to  occur  about  once  every  ten  or  fifteen 
years  in  any  one  area.  It  was  outlawed  by  the  British  and  has  not  oc- 
curred in  Bhatbair  for  30  years,  though  it  continues  to  be  performed 
in  attenuated  form  in  other  Pahari  regions.  The  immediate  motiva- 
tion for  the  ceremony  in  a  particular  village  was  to  alleviate  serious 
village-wide  difficulties  such  as  sickness  or  poor  crops,  attributed  by  a 
shaman  to  the  displeasure  of  this  god.  In  the  ceremony  itself,  after 
elaborate  preparation  sponsored  by  an  entire  village  and  supported 
with  donations  from  the  surrounding  region,  the  Brahmin  priests 
would  bless  the  Beda  and  worship  the  god.  Then,  sitting  on  a  small 
wooden  saddle,  the  Beda  would  slide  down  a  rope  incline  over  the 
edge  of  a  cliff  or  down  a  steep  slope.  By  so  honoring  the  god,  not  only 
the  sponsoring  village  derived  benefit  but  all  those  who  contributed 
and  all  in  attendance,  which  included  people  for  many  miles  around. 

C.  Ancestors 

Certain  ancestors  come  to  be  worshiped  much  like  household  gods, 
and  under  similar  conditions.  The  spirit  of  a  deceased  man  who  comes 
to  torment  the  household  in  which  he  had  lived  is  known  as  rati,  and 
that  of  a  deceased  woman  is  known  as  hanthia  (see  p.  110).  They  are 
symbolized  in  the  household  by  a  hand-sized  piece  of  wood  on  which 

the  following  figure  is  drawn:  ^\T^  •  This  is  kept  in  a  wall  niche,  and 

when  it  is  to  be  honored  it  is  placed  in  a  wooden  container  of  grain 
and  is  illuminated  with  a  lamp,  just  as  are  the  shrines  of  household 
gods.  Sometimes  the  symbol  is  engraved  by  a  goldsmith  on  a  silver 
plaque  and  is  worn  by  a  woman  as  a  neck  pendant  during  worship  and 
on  festival  occasions.2  When  the  spirit  torments  the  family,  illness — 


APPENDIX    I  387 

especially  skin  disease — and  dry  cows  are  the  usual  symptoms.  A  sha- 
man makes  the  diagnosis.  Then  a  kalratra  is  held,  in  which  a  house- 
hold member  becomes  possessed  by  the  spirit.  The  spirit  may  also  come 
during  a  kalratra  honoring  a  household  deity.  The  person  possessed 
dons  a  cap  and  carries  an  umbrella  or  cane  if  possessed  by  a  male  an- 
cestor, or  wears  a  head  scarf  if  possessed  by  an  hanthia,  and  weeps  as 
he  or  she  dances.  These  symbols  always  identify  an  ancestor  spirit.  A 
knowing  murmur  goes  around  when,  during  a  kalratra,  someone  be- 
gins to  dance  with  these  accouterments.  No  sacrifice  is  made  after 
the  dance,  but  halwa  and  purls  (unleavened  bread  fried  in  oil)  are 
served. 


APPENDIX   II:    CALENDRICAL 
RITES   IN    SIRKANDA 


Following  is  a  brief  description  of  all  the  calendrical  ceremonies  ob- 
served in  Sirkanda,  as  they  are  practiced  and  understood  by  the  people 
who  observe  them  (see  table  1,  p.  123).  These  ceremonies  can  be  com- 
pared with  the  detailed  account  of  calendrical  observances  in  Kumaon 
presented  by  Atkinson  (1884b,  pp.  55-63). 

Phul  Dalna  (Chait,  March-April) 

Each  day  during  this  month  the  preadolescent  children  of  every 
household  traditionally  pick  blossoms  of  whatever  flowers  are  avail- 
able. Each  morning  before  sunrise  they  place  the  blossoms  on  the  door- 
sills  of  their  houses  (hence  the  name  of  the  observance,  "flower  plac- 
ing"). In  reality  relatively  few  engage  in  this  performance  throughout 
the  month  with  any  degree  of  regularity.  The  exact  significance  of 
the  custom  is  unknown,  and  it  has  no  evident  Sanskritic  affinities.1 
It  is  associated  with  the  coming  of  spring  and  leads  up  to  the  following 
festival,  Popria  Sakrant. 


Popria  Sakrant  (first  day  of  Baisak,  April-May) 

The  first  day  of  every  month — the  date  upon  which  the  sun  is 
supposed  to  pass  from  one  constellation  to  another — is  called  Sakrant. 
In  some  areas  every  such  date  is  marked  by  festivals;  in  some,  none  are 
observed;   and  in   some,   Sirkanda   included,   particular   Sakrants   are 


APPENDIX    II  389 

celebrated.  The  first  of  Baisak  is  the  most  important  of  the  three 
Sakrants  celebrated  in  Sirkanda.  It  marks  the  end  and  climax  of  the 
month-long  Phul  Dalna.  It  is  known  as  Popria  Sakrant  after  the  thin 
rice  bread  called  popper  that  is  served  on  this  day.  Doors  and  other 
woodwork  of  village  houses  are  decorated  with  spots  of  the  white  rice 
flour  used  in  preparing  the  poppers — the  only  annual  occasion  for 
which  houses  are  decorated  in  Sirkanda.  Children  are  the  primary 
participants  in  this  festival.  Before  sunrise  they  go  to  the  watering 
place,  bathe,  and  pick  seven  kinds  of  flowers  into  small  baskets.  They 
return  home  and  place  the  flowers  at  the  doors  of  their  own  homes. 
Their  parents  refill  the  baskets  with  food — poppers,  puris,  and  a 
vegetable  mixture.  Each  child  then  passes  in  and  out  of  the  doorway 
of  his  house  seven  times,  receiving  a  vermilion  mark  on  his  forehead 
and  back  from  an  elderly  household  member  each  time  he  enters 
and  exits.  Thereafter  all  the  village  children  go  in  a  group  to  a  place 
in  the  fields  which  they  have  selected  or  where  they  have  placed  a 
stone  to  serve  as  the  shrine  for  worship  of  the  children's  god,  Lhesania. 
They  place  flower  petals  and  small  flags  on  the  shrine  and  eat  their 
food  offering,  and  the  celebration  is  over.  In  former  days  Bajgi  women 
danced  on  this  day  and  were  given  grain  in  return.  The  significance  of 
the  festival  beyond  its  obvious  association  with  spring  is  unknown.  At- 
kinson reports  a  similar  ceremony  called  Min  or  Haldua  Sakrant  in 
Kumaon  and  Garhwal.  It  has  no  evident  Sanskritic  affinities. 


Ghorlia  Sakrant  (first  of  Jet,  May-June) 

On  this  day  images  of  a  species  of  wild  goat  which  is  called 
GhoRl,  are  made  of  sweetened  dough  and  are  fried  in  oil.  They  are 
made  by  the  high-caste  women  and  are  given  to  their  children,  who 
play  with  them,  pretend  to  kill  them,  and  then  eat  them.  They  are 
also  given  to  low-caste  people  of  all  ages.  The  significance  of  this 
performance  is  unclear.  Perhaps  it  benefits  the  recipients  of  the  images. 
It  is  the  only  annual  festival  in  Sirkanda  which  fails  to  appear  in 
association  with  any  festival  mentioned  in  the  literature  I  have  sur- 
veyed. It  bears  some  superficial  resemblance  to  Magh  Cauth  as  de- 
scribed by  Planalp  (1956,  pp.  355  ff.),  but  there  is  no  evidence  upon 
which  to  base  a  relationship  between  the  two. 

Taulu  (Jet,  May-June) 

This  annual  fair  has  no  detectable  religious  implications.  It  re- 
sembles Diwali  in  its  timing  (it  follows  the  spring  harvest  as  Diwali 


390  APPENDIX    II 

follows  the  fall  harvest)  and  in  the  gaiety  of  the  event.  It  may  be 
related  to  a  widespread  non-Brahmanical  Pahari  harvest  festival  (cf. 
Atkinson,  1884b,  p.  64).  It  is  described  briefly  in  chapter  4. 


Rakri  (full  moon  of  Bhado,  August-September) 

On  this  date  Brahmins  go  from  house  to  house  tying  string 
bracelets  (rakri)  on  the  wrists  of  household  members.  In  return  the 
Brahmins  receive  from  an  anna  to  a  rupee  from  each  household.  A 
number  of  Brahmins  come  and  are  never  refused,  so  that  each  person 
usually  receives  several  of  these  charms.  This  is  supposed  to  be  aus- 
picious for  the  recipient.  One  informant  commented  that,  though  he 
did  not  know  the  exact  purpose,  it  seemed  to  him  that  the  performance 
benefited  the  Brahmins  more  than  anyone  else.  It  has  no  connotation 
of  brother-sister  devotion  as  it  does  in  some  plains  areas.  It  is  readily 
identifiable  with  Raksha  Bandhan,  celebrated  in  Dehra  Dun  and  else- 
where, and  with  Silono  or  Saluno,  reported  by  Lewis  (1958,  pp.  208  f.) 
and  Marriott  (1955a,  p.  198),  and  U pa-karma  of  Kumaon  (Atkinson, 
1884a,  p.  850).  Its  origin  and  exact  implications  are  obscure  to  Sir- 
kanda  people. 

Jenem  Ashtmi  Barat  (eighth  day  of  Bhado,  August-September) 

This  is  the  anniversary  of  Lord  Krishna's  birth  and  is  an  all- 
India  Hindu  festival.  In  Sirkanda  it  is  said  to  consist  of  a  day-long  fast 
followed  in  the  evening  by  a  feast  of  halwa,  kir  (sweet  rice  boiled  with 
milk),  and  fruit.  It  is  ignored  by  most  villagers. 

Kanagat  (first  fifteen  days  of  Asoj,  September-October) 

This  is  the  period  in  which  the  spirits  of  the  family  dead  are  hon- 
ored. A  Brahmin  determines  the  precise  day  (within  the  fifteen-day 
period  during  which  such  worship  occurs)  upon  which  each  deceased 
relative  is  to  be  honored,  apparently  keeping  in  mind  his  own  schedule, 
as  he  has  many  such  observances  over  which  to  preside.  On  the  ap- 
pointed day  the  family  prepares  kir,  which  is  fed  to  the  Brahmin  and 
family  members.  The  Brahmin  conducts  a  puja  and  receives  charity  of 
R.  1,  uncooked  rice,  flour,  and  sugar.  The  stated  purpose  is  to  comfort 
the  souls  of  the  deceased  and  prevent  them  from  becoming  restless  and 
troublesome  to  the  living.  Informants  stressed  that  there  is  consider- 
able social  pressure  to  carry  out  the  ceremony  to  demonstrate  respect 
for  one's  ancestors.  The  ceremony  is  widespread  in  India,  though  it 


APPENDIX    II  391 

is  not  mentioned  by  scholars  as  part  of  the  great  tradition  of  Hinduism. 
It  is  known  in  some  areas  as  Srdddhd  or  Shrddh. 


Nauratra  (first  nine  days  of  second  half  of  Asoj, 
September-October) 

This  festival,  also  known  locally  in  Sirkanda  as  Nardtd,  is  the 
nine-day  Hindu  celebration  honoring  the  female  form  of  Shiva  as 
Durga,  Kali,  or  other  manifestation.  In  Sirkanda  the  festival  is  known 
but  largely  ignored.  There  is  a  tradition,  however,  of  holding  a  village- 
wide  kalratra  on  one  or  more  of  the  nights  of  this  period  to  honor 
the  village  gods.  As  is  usual  on  such  occasions,  Devi,  who  is  the  local 
form  of  Durga,  is  among  the  deities  expected  to  dance,  and  the  local 
Brahmin  performs  worship  in  her  honor.  The  traditional  Hindu 
festival,  Dashera,  climaxing  the  nine  nights'  celebration,  receives  no 
recognition  at  all  in  Sirkanda. 

Gaojiman  (fifteenth  day  of  Katik,  October-November) 

This  is  the  ceremony  honoring  cattle  (the  literal  translation  of 
its  title),  which  on  the  plains  follows  immediately  after  Diwali  and  is 
widely  known  as  Gobardhan.  In  Sirkanda  it  falls  on  the  day  that 
elsewhere  is  Diwali.  In  Sirkanda  on  this  day,  family  members  feed 
their  cows  and  oxen  a  special  boiled  grain  mixture,  followed  by  fried 
delicacies,  which  on  other  occasions  are  reserved  for  human  consump- 
tion. Oil  is  rubbed  into  the  animals'  horns,  their  hooves  are  washed 
with  water,  and  ghee  is  burned  so  that  the  smoke  drifts  over  them. 
Finally,  family  members  fold  their  hands  in  respect  before  the  animals 
and  put  vermilion  marks  on  the  animals'  foreheads.  On  this  day 
family  members,  too,  eat  special  delicacies.  Two  days  later  (the  seven- 
teenth day  of  Katik),  called  Mavas,  the  animals  are  given  salt  to  lick, 
and  again  their  horns  are  oiled,  ghee  smoke  is  wafted  over  them,  and 
marks  are  put  on  their  foreheads.  This,  villagers  say,  honors  the  sanc- 
tity of  the  cow. 

Pahari  Diwali  (fifteenth  day  of  Magsir,  November-December) 

This,  the  festival  of  lights,  is  the  greatest  festival  in  Sirkanda 
and  one  of  the  greatest  in  India.  It  is  supposed  to  celebrate  Ram's 
victorious  return  from  his  conquest  of  Ceylon  and  to  honor  Lakshmi, 
goddess  of  wealth.  In  Sirkanda  many  people  are  vaguely  aware  of 
these  implications  but  are  little  concerned  with  them. 


392  APPENDIX    II 

In  Sirkanda,  as  in  most  neighboring  villages,  Diwali  is  celebrated 
exactly  a  month  later  than  on  the  plains.  This  is  a  long-standing  Pahari 
custom,  from  which  some  villages  in  Bhatbair  have  deviated  in  recent 
years  as  they  have  come  to  emulate  plains  ways  on  many  matters. 
Plains  Diwali  falls  precisely  in  the  midst  of  the  frantic  activity  of  fall 
harvest  and  planting  in  the  hills.  By  postponing  it  a  month,  hill  vil- 
lagers can  fully  enjoy  it. 

Diwali  is  of  two  days'  duration  in  Sirkanda,  "big  Diwali"  being  held 
the  day  before  "little  Diwali."  This  is  the  reverse  of  the  plains  custom 
and  was  explained  by  an  informant:  "Here  whatever  comes  first  is 
biggest."  For  the  Diwali  festival  many  Sirkanda  people  who  normally 
live  in  chans  come  home  to  the  village,  so  that  this  is  the  time  of 
greatest  population  concentration.  There  is  much  visiting,  drinking, 
eating  of  meat,  dancing,  singing,  some  gambling,  and  general  merry- 
making. Throughout  the  harvest  and  planting  season  people  have  been 
wearing  their  oldest,  dirtiest,  and  most  ragged  clothes.  On  Diwali  they 
suddenly  appear  clean  and  brightly  dressed  in  new  or  almost-new 
clothes.  The  carefree  atmosphere  is  in  marked  contrast  to  the  fatigue 
of  the  harvest  and  planting  just  past.  Hospitality  and  camaraderie 
are  at  their  height. 

On  big  Diwali  delicacies  are  cooked  and  served  in  every  household. 
Small  oil  lamps  made  of  dough  are  placed  in  windows  and  doorways  of 
some  houses  (many  do  not  do  this,  and  it  is  apparently  an  imitation  of 
the  plains  custom).  Late  in  the  evening  those  who  worship  Nag  Raja 
proceed  to  his  shrine  is  procession  with  a  large  torch  consisting  of  a 
long  stick  with  a  cucumber  on  the  end,  from  which  protrude  many 
small  burning  sticks.  The  torch  is  left  at  the  shrine  to  honor  the  god. 

Many  villagers  go  to  the  top  of  a  small  knoll  near  the  village,  where 
the  men  and  boys  "play  with  fire."  A  pitchy  pine  chip  is  tied  to 
the  end  of  a  light  rope-like  creeper  about  four  feet  long.  The  chip 
is  ignited  and  then  swung  around  with  considerable  skill  in  arcs  and 
circles  by  its  owner.  Several  men  do  this  at  once,  and  many  villagers 
watch  the  display.  Thereafter  a  kalratra  is  held  at  the  madan  or  open 
space  devoted  to  worship,  next  to  the  Pandavas'  temple.  This  is  one 
of  the  occasions  when  various  village  gods  are  likely  to  dance,  but 
the  main  purpose  of  the  dance  is  entertainment.  Both  women  and  men 
dance,  and  several  folk-dance  styles  are  displayed. 

Little  Diwali  is  a  repetition  of  big  Diwali  on  a  reduced  scale  with- 
out the  Nag  Raja  puja  and  usually  with  few  or  no  lights.  By  its  timing 
and  content  one  is  led  to  suspect  that  the  whole  celebration  is  derived 
from  a  regional  tradition,  probably  a  harvest  ceremony,  that  has  been 
assimilated  to  some  features  of  Diwali  of  the  great  tradition  (cf.  Atkin- 


APPENDIX    II  393 

son,  1884b,  p.  64).  This  seems  especially  likely  in  view  of  its  similarity 
to  the  nonreligious  taulu  following  immediately  after  the  other  yearly 
harvest. 


Kicheri  Sakrant  (first  of  Mau,  January-February) 

This  festival  is  named  for  the  boiled  mixture  of  rice  and  dal 
(kicheri)  that  is  the  characteristic  dish  of  the  day.  It  is  known  on  the 
plains  as  Makar  Sankrant.  On  this  day  Brahmin  men  are  supposed  to 
take  a  ritual  bath.  All  high-caste  village  households  cook  kicheri  with 
butter.  In  the  morning  Bajgis  go  from  house  to  house  playing  their 
drums  and  receiving  kicheri  in  return.  On  the  same  day  Brahmins  go 
through  the  village  and  are  given  charity  in  the  form  of  uncooked 
grain,  or  money.  At  this  time  Brahmins  appear  who  are  seldom  other- 
wise seen.  It  is  primarily  a  day  of  charity-giving. 

Panchmi  Basant  (fifth  day  of  Mau,  January-February) 

This  day  is  widely  celebrated  in  Northern  India  as  a  heralding 
of  spring,  to  which  the  title  refers.  In  Sirkanda  it  is  too  early  in  the 
season  to  be  a  fitting  spring  festival,  and  other  such  festivals  occur 
later  as  described  above.  However,  Panchmi  Basant  is  celebrated  in  a 
very  simple  fashion  in  Sirkanda.  The  village  barber  takes  barley  shoots 
from  the  fields  and  goes  from  house  to  house  in  the  village  affixing  a 
few  such  sprigs  with  cow  dung  at  the  two  upper  corners  of  every 
outside  door.  In  return  each  family  gives  him  one  pound  of  grain.  In 
addition  the  Bajgis  play  their  drums  and  are  rewarded  with  sugar  and 
grain.  A  few  families  prepare  special  food  for  themselves  on  this  day. 

Shiv  Ratri  Barat  (thirteenth  day  of  Phagun,  February- 
March) 

This  fast  honors  the  birth  of  Shiva,  according  to  villagers.  Families 
who  are  interested  fast  throughout  the  day.  In  the  evening  these 
families  feast  on  specially  prepared  foods.  Not  many  families  observe 
this  occasion  and  those  who  do,  do  so  inconspicuously. 

Other  Annual  Observances 

This  completes  the  yearly  ceremonial  round  in  Sirkanda.  In  addi- 
tion, the  month  of  Saon  (July-August)  is  thought  to  be  especially 
sacred  or  auspicious  for  worship.  During  Saon  two  special  types  of 


394  APPENDIX    II 

worship  are  performed  by  learned  outside  Brahmins:  japp,  the  repeti- 
tion of  sacred  texts  in  honor  of  Shiva  at  a  Shiva  temple  to  alleviate 
any  persistent  trouble,  and  rudrl  patt,  recitation  of  sacred  texts  in  the 
home,  usually  to  bring  about  conception  in  childless  wives.  Eclipses 
are  announced  in  advance  by  Brahmins.  When  they  occur  they  are 
generally  observed  by  fasting  followed  by  feasting.  Pregnant  women 
and  people  whose  horoscopes  indicate  that  the  particular  eclipse  is 
unfavorable  for  them,  avoid  looking  at  it. 


APPENDIX   III:    LIFE-CYCLE 
RITES   IN    SIRKANDA 


Atkinson  (1884b,  pp.  64  ft.)  gives  a  detailed  account  of  life-cycle  rites 
as  they  ideally  occur  among  educated,  well-to-do  people  of  Kumaon. 
He  comments  with  regard  to  this  category  of  ritual: 

It  is  followed  as  a  rule  only  by  the  educated  and  orthodox  and  ...  its  use 
has  not  yet  permeated  the  masses,  nor  are  its  rules,  except  in  a  very  abbrevi- 
ated form,  understood  by  many  of  them.  The  ritual  for  temple  use  has  been 
compiled  by  a  class  for  their  own  purposes.  .  .  .  The  village-deities  have  no 
formal  ritual  committed  to  writing  and  in  general  use,  so  that  the  ceremony 
is  a  meagre  imitation  of  that  in  use  in  the  orthodox  temples  and  varies  with 
the  celebrant,  (pp.  64  ff.)  With  regard  to  these  and  all  other  observances  their 
length  and  character  would  seem  to  depend  on  the  means  and  inclination  of 
the  person  who  causes  the  ceremony  to  be  performed.  The  poor  man  obtains 
a  very  shortened  service  for  his  few  coins,  whilst  the  wealthy  can  command 
the  entire  ritual  and  the  services  of  numerous  skilled  celebrants,  (p.  64) 

The  interested  reader  should  consult  Atkinson  for  detailed  data 
on  the  rituals  discussed  below.  Here  are  given  only  the  outlines  of  the 
important  events  and  rituals  of  the  life  cycle  as  performed  and  per- 
ceived by  Sirkanda  villagers. 

A.  Birth  and  Childhood  Ceremonies  (see  Atkinson,  1884b, 
pp.  79  ff.) 

Birth  takes  place  in  a  room  of  the  family  house  with  the  mother 
lying  on  a  leaf-mat  rain  covering.  There  are  no  professional  midwives, 


396  APPENDIX  III 

but  any  one  of  several  experienced  village  women  assist  at  the  birth. 
These  women  may  be  of  any  caste.  At  present  a  Rajput  and  a  Bajgi 
are  the  two  who  most  often  assist.  The  umbilical  cord  is  cut  by  the 
mother  herself.  The  afterbirth  is  put  in  a  basket  and  buried  by  the 
husband  or  other  male  family  member.  Afterwards  the  mother  bathes 
herself  and  the  baby,  with  the  assistance  of  other  household  women, 
and  puts  on  different  clothes.  The  room  is  replastered  with  dung. 
Immediately  after  birth  the  mother  eats  sweetened  porridge  and  a 
mixture  of  milk  and  ghee  to  strengthen  herself.  She  continues  to  do 
so  daily  for  a  few  days.  She  is  supposed  to  bathe  herself  and  the  child 
daily  for  about  thirty  days,  using  cow's  urine  as  well  as  water.  Actually 
the  mother  and  child  should  bathe  regularly  with  cow's  urine  for 
several  years,  but  people  content  themselves  with  an  occasional  rinse 
of  arms  and  legs  in  cow's  urine.  The  mother's  period  of  ritual  pollution 
is  supposed  to  last  forty  days  but,  as  with  menstrual  pollution,  this 
is  not  observed  in  Sirkanda.  "We  can't  afford  those  things — there  is 
too  much  work  to  do."  Therefore  a  woman  is  back  in  normal  circu- 
lation about  ten  days  after  giving  birth.  For  those  ten  days  no  one 
else  takes  food  or  drink  from  her  hand,  and  she  does  no  work  and 
does  not  sleep  with  her  husband.  She  also  takes  special  precautions 
to  avoid  the  attack  of  churail,  the  ghosts  of  women  who  have  died  in 
childbirth. 

Das  sotan,  the  child's  first  ceremony,  is  held  on  the  tenth  day  after 
birth.  Friends  and  relatives  may  be  invited  to  attend,  and  if  so,  they 
often  bring  small  gifts  of  jewelry  and  adornment  for  the  child.  After- 
wards they  are  fed  halwa.  On  this  day  a  Brahmin  is  called  and  he 
begins  preparation  of  the  child's  horoscope,  a  process  which  may  take 
many  days,  during  which  time  he  lives  at  the  house  of  his  client. 
Early  in  the  morning  of  the  tenth  day  he  performs  a  puja,  and  the 
hawan  (sacred  fire)  is  worshiped.  Then  the  family  is  purified  in  the 
following  manner.  The  Brahmin  mixes  five  substances  in  a  cup:  Ganges 
water,  sugar,  curds,  cow's  urine,  and  a  copper  coin.  The  Brahmin 
chants  mantras  as  the  mother  and  then  other  household  members 
sip  a  little  of  this  concoction  from  their  hands  and  then  place  their 
dampened  palms  on  their  hair.  The  remainder  of  the  mixture  is 
sprinkled  about  the  house.  The  child  receives  a  name  from  the  Brah- 
min, who  writes  it  in  his  horoscope. 

The  "taste  of  boiled  rice,"  held  one  year  after  birth,  is  accompanied 
by  a  puja,  and  hawan,  the  sacred  fire,  is  worshiped.  Relatives  may  be 
invited. 

Kindred  are  called  as  guests  to  witness  a  boy's  first  haircut.  On 
this  day  the  Brahmin  performs  a  puja  before  and  after  the  haircutting 


APPENDIX   III  397 

(cf.  Atkinson,  1884b,  p.  91).  Coins  have  been  tied  in  cloth  and  put  in 
the  child's  hair,  and  the  barber  (or  Dom  who  performs  barbering 
services)  keeps  these  as  well  as  various  delicacies  that  are  placed  in  a 
tray  next  to  the  child  during  the  procedure.  The  hair  clippings  are 
placed  with  cow  dung,  milk,  and  two  coins  in  a  cloth  to  be  later 
deposited  in  a  holy  river  to  bless  the  child  and  prevent  its  sacred  first- 
hair  from  being  defiled.  After  the  haircutting  the  child  is  then  ritually 
cleansed  in  the  well-known  purificatory  ceremony  (ban)  involving  a 
ceremonial  bath  given  by  female  relatives,  just  as  the  bride  and  groom 
are  given  in  preparation  for  the  marriage  ceremony.  There  is  feasting 
and  giving  of  small  gifts  to  the  child  after  the  ceremony. 

When  two  women  have  babies  within  the  same  month,  the  mothers 
are  potentially  dangerous  to  one  another.  If  the  shadow  of  one  falls 
on  the  other,  the  child  of  the  latter  will  become  sickly.  Infant  illness 
is  frequently  diagnosed  as  stemming  from  this  event.  To  prevent  this 
the  "colliding"  ceremony  is  performed.  In  this  ceremony  a  dark  place — 
usually  a  room  in  a  house — is  chosen  where  no  shadow  is  formed. 
There  the  two  mothers  stand  on  either  side  of  a  string  cot  turned  up 
on  its  side,  embrace  one  another  over  the  cot,  and  exchange  necklaces. 
Thereafter  they  need  not  fear  one  another. 

If  a  woman  has  not  had  children,  her  family  may  resort  to  the 
special  worship  called  rudri  patt.  This  is  done  yearly  during  the  sacred 
month  of  Saon  (July-August)  until  a  child  is  born  or  the  hopeful 
couple  gives  up.  A  learned  Brahmin  performs  this  worship  by  coming 
to  the  home  of  his  client  and  there  reading  scriptures  through  the  day 
for  four  to  eight  consecutive  days.  He  blesses  the  household  members 
each  time,  and  is  paid  in  return.  If  the  worship  produces  results  it  is 
continued  yearly  throughout  the  lifetime  of  the  children  so  begotten. 
At  least  three  Sirkanda  families  have  had  success  with  rudri  patt. 


B.  Marriage  Ceremonies  (see  Atkinson,  1884b,  pp.  94  ff.) 

Engagement 

The  father  or  elder  brother  of  a  marriageable  boy  makes  the 
initial  arrangements  for  marriage.  This  procedure  is  the  reverse  of  the 
usual  one  in  the  plains,  where  it  is  the  responsibility  of  the  family  of 
the  bride  to  make  the  initial  contacts  (Lewis,  1958,  p.  159;  Planalp, 
1956,  p.  453).  The  difference  may  bear  some  relationship  to  the 
financial  obligations  of  the  two  parties.  In  the  plains  it  is  the  bride's 
family  who  must  give  a  gift  (dowry)  to  the  family  of  the  groom,  but 
here  it  is  the  reverse  (bride  price).  In  both  cases  it  is  the  family  making 


398  APPENDIX   III 

the  investment  which  shops  around  and  makes  the  preliminary  ar- 
rangements. When  a  prospective  bride  is  found,  her  father  is  con- 
sulted and,  if  willing,  gives  the  girl's  horoscope  to  the  prospective 
groom's  father,  who  takes  it  to  his  Brahmin.1  If  the  horoscopes  of 
boy  and  girl  are  compatible,  the  prospective  groom's  father  returns  to 
the  girl's  parents  and  gives  them  pakoras  (fried  delicacies  similar  to 
fritters)  and  halwa.2  The  girl's  family  then  gives  the  boy's  father  a 
meal,  a  "relationship  feast."  This  signifies  that  the  "asking"  has  been 
done  and  that  the  union  is  agreed  upon.  The  groom's  father  informs 
the  family  of  the  bride  when  he  will  return  for  sagai  (the  formal  en- 
gagement). On  the  appointed  day  the  father  comes  in  the  company 
of  a  few  male  relatives,  bearing  the  hasli  (heavy,  solid  silver  necklace), 
which  is  worn  thereafter  by  the  girl  as  the  symbol  of  engagement.  He 
also  brings  a  set  of  clothes  for  the  girl.  The  Brahmin  performs  a  puja 
and  puts  the  hasli  and  a  vermilion  mark  on  the  girl.  Then  her  parents 
feed  the  guests  and  other  villagers,  and  the  engagement  is  formally 
established.  If  it  is  to  be  a  bride-price  wedding,  half  or  all  of  the 
amount  is  paid  at  this  time.  The  wedding  ceremony  follows  at  the 
convenience  of  the  bride's  family,  who  act  upon  the  advice  of  their 
Brahmin  in  setting  a  date.  Certain  months  are  considered  auspicious 
for  marriages — notably  the  period  December  through  March,  which 
is  also  the  agricultural  slack  season — and  most  marriages  take  place 
during  these  months  on  dates  found  to  be  favorable  by  the  Brahmin. 
The  wedding  usually  takes  place  from  a  month  to  a  year  after  the 
engagement.  The  engagement  normally  takes  place  between  the  ages 
of  ten  and  fifteen  for  girls,  and  fourteen  and  twenty-one  for  boys.  Be- 
tween the  initial  agreement  and  marriage  the  couple  are  not  supposed 
to  talk  with  one  another,  but  there  is  no  objection  to  their  seeing  one 
another  if  they  happen  to  be  in  the  same  vicinity. 

There  is  another  type  of  engagement  called  a  "womb  engagement," 
in  which  two  pregnant  women  of  the  appropriate  caste  and  sib 
grouping  agree  to  marry  their  offspring  if  they  are  of  opposite  sexes. 
The  two  potential  mothers  put  marks  on  one  another's  foreheads  and 
become  simdJil  (in-laws).  The  bond  is,  of  course,  ignored  if  the  children 
are  of  the  same  sex  or  if  one  dies.  If  all  goes  well  the  marriage  may  be 
celebrated  at  age  eight  or  nine. 

Preparation  for  the  Wedding 

Well  in  advance  of  the  wedding  the  barber  and  his  family  prepare 
leaf  plates  for  use  at  the  various  feasts  associated  with  it.  The  barber 
is  also  responsible  for  inviting  the  wedding  guests.  He  does  this  by 
taking  a  lump  of  gur  (brown  sugar)  to  each  household  head  to  be 


APPENDIX   III  399 

invited,  and  announcing  the  time  and  place.  In  the  same  manner  the 
Brahmin,  too,  often  invites  people  whom  he  sees  on  his  rounds.  Shortly 
before  the  ceremonies  are  to  begin,  various  delicacies  may  be  dis- 
tributed to  villagers  by  the  families  involved  in  the  ceremony. 

From  this  point  on  the  ceremonies  begin,  and  they  differ  according 
to  the  type  of  marriage. 

The  Wedding 

For  the  traditional  Pahari  ceremony  a  group  of  four  or  five  men 
from  the  groom's  village  and  sib  go  to  that  of  the  bride  on  the  day 
of  the  ceremony  or  the  day  before,  depending  upon  the  distance  to 
be  traveled.  There  they  complete  the  payment  of  bride  price  and  are 
fed.  The  bride  has  been  dressed  in  the  one-piece  garment  worn  by  un- 
married girls,  and  in  a  head  scarf.  She  is  carried  by  her  own  brother 
or  her  mother's  brother,  on  his  back,  in  the  company  of  the  groom's 
relatives,  to  the  village  and  house  of  the  groom,  where  the  marriage 
ceremony  is  performed. 

The  Sanskritized  ceremonies  are  so  similar,  whether  in  bride-price 
or  dowry  marriages,  that  they  will  here  be  described  together  and, 
where  points  of  difference  occur,  the  differences  will  be  mentioned. 
The  greatest  difference  is  in  quantity — dowry  marriages  are  larger, 
gayer,  more  elaborate  (reflecting  the  greater  wealth  of  the  participating 
families)  than  are  bride-price  weddings.  Participants  in  a  wedding  in- 
clude primarily  the  kindred  of  each  of  the  principals.  Members  of  the 
household,  lineage,  clan,  sib,  and  non-sib  kindred  participate  in  that 
order.  These  plus  others  of  the  same  or  ritually  similar  castes  are 
guests.  Various  specialists  (Brahmins,  barber,  Bajgis)  perform  special 
functions  as  described  below. 

There  is  activity  for  some  time  in  advance  of  the  wedding,  preparing 
food  and  accommodations  for  the  guests,  preparing  the  clothing  and 
other  accouterments  for  the  ceremonies,  cleaning,  whitewashing,  and 
decorating  houses,  and  so  on.  Before  the  groom's  party  leaves  for  the 
bride's  village,  where  the  wedding  is  to  take  place,  the  guests  are  fed 
twice:  once  on  the  evening  before  and  once  on  the  morning  or  noon 
of  the  day  of  departure.  The  food  is  generally  cooked  by  hired  Brahmin 
cooks  of  the  ritually  pure  Sarola  subcaste.  It  is  the  duty  of  the  Bajgis 
to  play  their  drums  during  each  meal  served.  The  barber  is  present 
to  set  out  the  leaf  plates  and  perform  any  tasks  that  may  be  required 
of  him  throughout  the  festivities  and  particularly  at  mealtime. 

Ceremonies  in  the  groom's  village  begin  either  the  day  before  the 
departure  of  the  marriage  party  or,  more  commonly,  on  the  day  of 
departure.  The  choice  is  made  by  his  family  in  consultation  with 


400  APPENDIX    III 

their  Brahmin  and  depends  partly  on  how  elaborate  the  ceremonies 
are  to  be,  and  partly  on  the  distance  of  the  bride's  village.  Here  I 
shall  assume  that  the  ceremonies  occur  on  the  day  of  departure. 

In  the  morning  the  groom  has  his  hair  cut  and  then  undergoes  the 
ban  ceremony,  in  which  he  is  ritually  purified.  The  area  of  the  cere- 
mony has  first  been  plastered  with  cow  dung  by  the  barber.  Then  a 
sacred  diagram  is  drawn  on  the  earth  with  flour  by  the  Brahmin.  Over 
this  diagram  is  placed  a  square  stool  to  which  are  tied  certain  sacred 
objects,  and  upon  which  the  groom  sits  throughout  the  ban  ceremony. 
A  canopy  containing  ritual  items  in  a  tray  is  held  over  the  groom's 
head.  The  Brahmin  begins  with  a  puja.  Next,  female  relatives  of  the 
groom  ritually  purify  him  and  then  ceremonially  bathe  him  in  a  mix- 
ture of  oil,  water,  and  turmeric  while  the  Brahmin  chants  mantras. 
This  drawn-out  ceremony  is  accompanied  by  considerable  horseplay 
and  public  interest,  especially  in  its  later  stages.  After  the  bath  the 
groom  is  carried  by  a  male  relative  to  a  room  in  his  house,  where  the 
sacred  thread  ceremony  is  performed  if  the  groom  has  not  already 
undergone  the  ceremony,  as  he  probably  has  not  unless  he  has  been 
previously  married.  Then  the  groom  is  dressed  in  the  traditional  white 
clothes,  green  sash,  yellow  turban,  and  veil  or  garland  which  he  will 
wear  throughout  the  ceremonies  to  follow.  The  barber  does  not  assist 
in  the  dressing,  as  he  often  does  in  the  plains.  Then  the  Brahmin 
performs  the  Ganesh  puja  (elephant-headed  god  ceremony),  which  en- 
sures success  in  any  venture.  Thereafter  the  groom  is  carried  to  a  large 
rug,  where  he  sits  with  another  man  who  acts  as  accountant  as  they 
receive  and  record  the  traditional  gifts  of  money  which  relatives  and 
other  guests  bring  and  which  must  be  repaid  at  future  marriage  cere- 
monies which  the  groom  or  his  relatives  attend  as  guests.  All  this  is 
standard  practice  in  Hindu  marriages.  Then  the  party  is  fed  and  prep- 
arations are  made  to  leave  for  the  bride's  village  in  time  to  arrive 
at  about  sundown.  The  entire  party,  called  a  bardt,  collects  at  the 
groom's  house,  where  they  line  up,  musicians  first,  then  the  palanquin 
or  horse  which  will  carry  the  groom,  followed  in  turn  by  the  family  and 
guests.  Only  men  take  part  in  the  barat.  To  the  accompaniment  of 
horns,  drums,  and  waving  flags,  the  barat  proceeds  to  the  Raghunath 
temple  (if  the  groom  is  a  Sirkanda  villager),  where  the  groom  leaves 
an  offering  and  receives  a  blessing  from  the  keeper  of  the  temple.  Then 
the  party  is  off  to  the  bride's  village,  stopping  periodically  to  rest  and 
in  at  least  one  place  to  give  gratuities  to  the  musicians.  Their  way 
into  the  bride's  village  is  lighted  by  bonfires  built  by  the  bride's  family 
if  darkness  falls  before  their  arrival.  As  they  enter  the  village  the  mem- 
bers of  the  barat  take  pains  to  make  a  favorable  impression.  The 


APPENDIX    III  401 

musicians  recommence  to  play,  the  groom  is  in  his  palanquin  (though 
he  may  have  walked  most  of  the  way),  and  the  guests  and  relatives 
put  on  their  shoes,  which  were  taken  off  to  facilitate  walking.  They 
are  given  a  place  to  rest  and  service  of  tea.  The  groom  undergoes  a 
short  puja  in  which  the  Brahmins  of  both  families  participate,  and  all 
the  guests  are  blessed.  In  a  dowry  marriage  the  bride's  father  greets 
the  groom  and  ceremonially  presents  him  with  a  coconut  and  one 
rupee  tied  with  a  sacred  string,  to  symbolize  that  the  groom  is  to 
take  full  responsibility  for  the  bride  and  is  considered,  by  his  father- 
in-law,  to  be  a  worthy  recipient  of  this  "daughter-charity." 

Even  when  the  bride  lives  in  the  same  village  as  the  groom  there 
is  a  barat  and  precisely  the  same  procedure  is  followed,  except  that  the 
procession  goes  only  to  a  large  tree  outside  the  village,  circles  around 
it,  and  comes  back  to  the  bride's  house. 

Equivalent  preparations  have  taken  place  in  the  bride's  village.  The 
bride  goes  through  the  same  ceremonies  as  the  groom  except  that  there 
is  no  investiture  with  the  sacred  thread,  and  only  women  are  present 
during  the  ceremonial  bath.  Her  dress  is  not  ritually  prescribed  as  is 
the  groom's,  and  generally  consists  of  the  fanciest  clothes  available, 
now  often  including  the  sari  (women's  garment  typical  of  the  valley 
and  new  to  these  hills).  The  bride's  family  receives  grain  rather  than 
money  as  the  traditional  contribution  of  relatives.  They  have  had 
their  own  guests  to  feed  and  preparations  to  make  for  the  coming 
wedding  party. 

When  the  entire  wedding  party  is  assembled  at  the  bride's  home 
dinner  is  served,  the  groom  eating  with  the  barat  and  the  bride  with 
her  female  relatives.  Then  the  bride's  Brahmin  calls  her  to  dress.  He 
gives  her  the  jewelry  brought  by  the  groom's  family  and  also  the  silver 
paper  mask  (mor)  which  she  will  wear  during  the  ceremony.  The 
jewelry  given  by  the  groom's  family  always  includes  the  large  gold  nose 
ring  (natola)  which  she  will  wear  throughout  her  married  life  in  honor 
of  her  husband  and  as  the  symbol  of  her  marriage.  Generally  a  nose 
pendant  (bulaki)  of  gold,  also  a  symbol  of  marriage,  is  given,  and 
whatever  else  the  groom's  family  can  afford — much  more  in  a  dowry 
marriage  than  a  bride-price  one.  In  jewelry  gifts,  as  in  all  phases  of 
the  wedding,  prestige  is  an  important  factor — the  more  lavish  and  con- 
spicuous the  expenditure,  the  more  prestigeful  is  the  family  who  made 
the  expenditure.  A  bride's  family  is  likely  to  complain  loudly  if  they 
consider  the  expenditures  of  the  groom's  family  insufficient,  and  to  be- 
little them  in  any  event. 

Next  the  bride  goes  to  the  place  of  the  ceremony,  escorted  by  a  sister 
or  other  female  relative  and  by  her  Brahmin.  The  groom  is  led  by 


402  APPENDIX   III 

his  Brahmin.  By  now  it  is  probably  late  at  night — the  exact  time  is 
determined  by  the  Brahmins.  Meanwhile  the  guests  have  been  engaged 
in  visiting,  singing,  dancing,  and  drinking,  and  they  will  continue  in 
this,  drifting  in  and  out  of  the  ceremony  itself  as  the  spirit  and  spirits 
move  them. 

SANSKRITIZED    CEREMONY 

In  bride-price  marriages  the  wedding  takes  place  indoors  so  that 
the  audience  is  limited  in  numbers — usually  no  handicap  since  there 
are  relatively  few  guests  at  such  marriages.  In  dowry  marriages  the 
ceremony  is  held  out-of-doors.  In  the  initial  stages  of  the  ceremony 
the  bride  and  her  Brahmin  are  separated  from  the  groom  and  the 
audience  by  a  black  curtain.  Sometimes  they  are  in  a  separate  room. 
A  long  puja  is  conducted  (gotra  puja,  phratry  ceremony)  in  which  the 
gotra  (phratry)  affiliations  of  the  couple  are  recounted,   though,   as 
was  shown  in  chapter  5,  these  do  not  have  the  relevance  in  this  area 
that  they  have  in  the  plains.  The  puja  is  followed  by  the  well-known 
pherd  ceremony,  which  takes  place  in  a  different  part  of  the  room 
or  area.  In  this  the  bride  and  groom  circumambulate  seven  times  an 
elaborate  shrine  (bedl)  containing,  among  other  things,  a  sacred  fire 
— an  all-night  process.  Before  doing  so  they  undergo  a  puja  and  are 
joined  by  knotting  together  the  sash  of  the  groom  and  the  stole  or  sari 
of  the  bride,  symbolizing  their  union.  The  circumambulation  proceeds 
to  the  accompaniment  of  puja  and  recitation  by  the  Brahmins,  with 
great  reluctance  displayed  by   the  bride,  who  sometimes  is  offered 
bribes  to  speed  her  up.  Then  the  bride  and  groom  feed  one  another 
curds  as  the  Brahmin  sits  between  them  and  recites  mantras.  There- 
after they  each  eat  some  of  the  food  that  the  other  has  left — an  act 
symbolizing  their  intimate  relationship,  as  only  members  of  the  same 
nuclear  family  eat  one  another's  food.  Then  there  is  a  brief  ceremony 
in  which  seven  lamps  and  seven  coins  are  placed  on  a  stone  grinding 
slab,  with  the  stone  pestle  lying  at  one  end.  The  groom  sits  and  the 
bride  stands  beside  him.  The  groom  extinguishes  the  lamps  by  taking 
the  bride's  foot  in  his  hands,  placing  it  on  the  stone,  and  with  it 
pushing  the  pestle  across   the  slab,   knocking  away   the   lamps  and 
coins.3  Then  the  couple  is  led  by  the  Brahmins   in  making  seven 
matrimonial  promises.  Following  this,  gifts  of  clothing,  and  sometimes 
a  ring  and  money,  are  given  by  the  bride's  father  to  the  groom.  Also, 
at  this  time,  dowry  is  presented  by  the  bride's  father.  There  is  always 
some  dowry  presented  regardless  of  whether  or  not  it  is  a  dowry  mar- 
riage. If  it  is  a  bride-price  marriage  the  dowry  will  be  only  a  brass  tray 
and  pot  and  perhaps  a  cow.  If  it  is  a  dowry  marriage,  utensils,  bedding, 


APPENDIX    III  403 

jewelry,  and  other  things  will  be  given,  often  in  considerable  quantity. 

Thereafter  the  couple  goes  to  the  bride's  house,  where  they  eat 
separately.  At  this  time  the  bride's  sister  removes  the  groom's  face 
garland  and  gets  Rs.  1.25  in  return.  The  groom  also  exchanges  two 
rupees  for  the  blessings  of  his  parents-in-law  ("in-law  offerings").  Then 
the  groom  rejoins  the  members  of  the  barat  and  the  bride  stays  in 
her  house.  In  a  dowry  marriage  the  bride  and  groom  undergo  one 
more  puja  in  the  morning  and  must  sit  in  the  bedi  or  shrine  before 
leaving  the  village. 

Before  leaving  her  village  the  bride  joins  her  parents  and  the 
Brahmin  in  a  puja  to  their  household  god  or  gods.  The  barat  forms 
outside  the  bride's  house  with  the  groom  mounted  on  horseback,  and 
with  the  palanquin  fitted  with  side  curtains  to  receive  the  bride.  The 
bride  is  carried  to  it  by  her  brother  or  her  mother's  brother,  who  will 
accompany  her  to  her  husband's  village.  Everyone  is  blessed  by  the 
bride's  Brahmin,  a  gun  is  fired,  and  the  barat  proceeds  as  tearful  fare- 
wells are  exchanged  by  the  bride  and  her  relatives. 

When  the  barat  reaches  the  groom's  village  it  proceeds  to  the  Rag- 
hunath  temple  or  other  village  temple,  where  the  bride  leaves  an 
offering  and  is  blessed,  and  the  groom  leaves  another  token  offering. 
Then  they  proceed  to  the  groom's  house,  where  the  couple  sits  on  a 
carpet  in  front  of  the  house  and  a  puja  is  held  honoring  the  household 
god  or  gods  of  the  groom.  The  groom's  mother  greets  the  couple  by 
pouring  water  on  all  sides  of  them  as  a  purificatory  rite  and  then 
sipping  the  water.  Next  the  bride  enters  the  house  and  sits  while  the 
mother-in-law  washes  her  feet  and  touches  the  soiled  water  with  her 
lips.  The  bride  kneels  at  the  feet  of  her  mother-in-law  and  sisters-in- 
law,  placing  one  rupee  at  the  feet  of  each.  The  mother-in-law  blesses 
the  couple  with  vermilion  marks.  The  women  of  the  house  embrace 
the  bride  and  she  sits  with  them,  the  groom  with  the  men.  Thereafter 
everyone  is  fed  and  then  retires,  the  bride  with  her  female  in-laws  and 
the  groom  with  his  male  relatives. 

The  following  morning  the  bride  accompanies  village  women  to 
the  water  source  where  she  performs  a  brief  ceremony  and  returns 
with  the  others,  carrying  a  pot  of  water  to  her  new  home.  At  noon 
there  is  the  final  feeding  of  the  guests,  who  then  disperse  to  their  homes, 
including  the  bride's  relative  who  accompanied  her. 

Two  to  four  days  later,  as  the  Brahmin  decides,  the  bride  and  groom 
return  to  the  bride's  house,  where  they  stay  one  to  four  days.  This  pe- 
riod is  called  donoj.  If  the  bride  is  considered  too  young  to  live  with 
her  husband,  he  will  return  home  and  the  donoj  period  may  last  a  year 
or  longer.  When  the  donoj  is  finished,  whether  it  is  a  few  days  or  a 


404  APPENDIX    III 

year  or  more,  the  bride  and  groom  return  together  to  the  groom's 
village,  generally  accompanied  by  male  relatives  of  each,  and  there 
they  remain.  The  bride  usually  returns  home  to  visit  once  every  one 
to  three  years.  The  couple  generally  do  not  begin  to  cohabit  for 
several  days,  weeks,  or  months  after  the  donoj,  as  the  groom's  female 
relatives  keep  a  close  eye  on  the  bride  and  to  some  extent  determine 
when  she  and  her  husband  can  be  together.  There  are  not,  however, 
separate  women's  quarters,  as  are  found  among  many  plains  groups, 
and  it  is  possible  for  the  couple  to  arrange  early  contacts  if  they  so 
desire,  especially  since  both  men  and  women  work  away  from  the 
house  part  of  each  day.  A  story  is  told  of  one  frightened  and  naive 
bride  in  Sirkanda  who  avoided  her  young  husband  for  over  a  year. 
Finally  a  group  of  village  wives  waylaid  her  in  the  jungle,  told  her  to 
start  sleeping  with  her  husband,  and  unceremoniously  deflowered  her 
artificially  to  overcome  her  reluctance. 

TRADITIONAL    CEREMONY 

In  the  non-Sanskritized  wedding,  when  the  girl  arrives  on  the  back 
of  her  brother  or  maternal  uncle  at  the  house  of  the  groom,  she  and 
the  groom  and  his  family  enter  immediately  into  the  puja  for  the 
gods  of  the  household.  Then  the  Ganesh  puja  is  performed.  Each  guest 
puts  a  rupee  on  a  tray  for  the  Brahmin,  after  which  the  Brahmin 
blesses  the  couple  and  their  relatives  with  marks  on  their  foreheads. 
In  the  evening  a  feast  is  held.  The  next  morning  a  goat  is  sacrificed 
to  the  household  god  and  another  feast  is  held,  ending  the  festivities. 
Some  few  educated  families  (none  in  Sirkanda)  are  said  to  have  sub- 
stituted a  reading  from  scriptures  for  the  puja  to  household  gods,  and 
in  such  cases  this  was  done  the  morning  after  the  wedding  and  no  goat 
was  sacrificed.  The  traditional  wedding  always  included  a  bride  price. 
When  dowry  marriages  occurred,  the  Sanskritized  wedding  ceremony 
was  followed. 


C.  Death  Ceremonies  (see  Atkinson,  1885,  pp.   1-16) 

For  descriptive  purposes  death  ceremonies  in  Sirkanda  can  be 
divided  into  (1)  preparation  for  death  and  cremation,  (2)  cremation, 
including  trip  to  and  from  cremation  grounds,  (3)  post-cremation  cere- 
monies. 

Preparation  for  Death  and  Cremation 

When  a  person  is  thought  to  be  dying,  the  "cow  charity"  ceremony 
is  performed  in  which  a  cow  is  given  to  the  purohit.  If  death  comes 


APPENDIX    III  405 

suddenly,  the  ceremony  is  conducted  as  soon  as  possible  after  death. 
The  cow  facilitates  the  soul's  journey  across  the  river  barrier  to  sudrg 
(heaven)  which  takes  place  on  the  thirteenth  day  after  death  (or, 
according  to  some  reports,  may  not  occur  until  a  year  after  death  if 
the  deceased  has  not  led  a  good  life).  When  death  is  imminent,  the  dy- 
ing person  is  put  on  the  ground  by  household  members  and  is  purified 
by  putting  small  bits  of  gold  wrapped  in  cotton  in  the  nostrils,  ears, 
and  mouth.  A  calf  and  various  other  items  are  gathered  to  be  given 
to  the  purohit.  When  death  occurs,  villagers  and  nearby  friends  and 
relatives  are  informed,  usually  by  a  low-caste  boy  or  by  any  passing 
person  who  has  heard  the  news.  Those  involved  most  directly  in  the 
mourning  and  ritual  pollution  which  results  from  death  of  a  man 
are  the  male  lineage  members — those  who  trace  descent  to  a  common 
ancestor.  Those  involved  for  a  married  woman  are  members  of  her 
husband's  lineage.  The  sib  and  clan  are  also  important  at  this  time. 
They  and  non-sib  kindred  and  fellow  villagers  of  the  same  caste  who 
wish  to,  fast  for  a  day  as  a  symbol  of  mourning. 

The  body  is  bathed  by  family  members,  and  new  or  at  least  clean 
clothes  are  put  on  it.  Then  the  body  is  put  on  a  stretcher-like  rec- 
tangular bamboo  and  cloth  frame.  It  is  covered  with  a  white  sheet 
and  a  red  shawl  and  tied  down.  Then  (the  same  day  if  there  is  still 
daylight,  the  next  if  it  is  evening)  it  is  carried  to  the  cremation  place, 
which  is  located  near  running  water.  Only  men  attend  the  cremation 
ceremony,  as  many  as  are  invited  and  wish  to  attend.  This  group  always 
includes  household  and  lineage  fellows  (husband's  lineage  fellows  if 
a  wife  has  died),  and,  depending  upon  the  importance  of  the  individual, 
it  includes  other  members  of  the  clan,  sib,  caste,  ritually  similar  castes, 
village,  and  area,  in  order  of  decreasing  likelihood  of  attendance.  In 
Sirkanda  the  wealth  and  importance  of  the  deceased  determines  where 
he  or  she  will  be  cremated.  The  locations,  in  order  of  increasing  de- 
sirability, are:  one  of  two  places  by  running  water  within  three  trail 
miles  of  Sirkanda;  a  place  eight  trail  miles  away  at  the  junction  of 
two  rivers;  and  the  Ganges  at  Hardwar  some  60  miles  away.  The  last 
of  these  is  expensive  (requiring  a  hired  motor  vehicle)  and  only  a 
well-off,  highly  respected,  elderly  male  would  be  taken  there.  En  route 
to  the  cremation  ground  five,  or  sometimes  seven,  balls  of  barley  flour 
dough  are  carried  with  the  funeral  party.  One  is  deposited  near  the 
sacred  pepil  tree  in  Sirkanda,  one  by  each  of  three  places  where  water 
is  crossed  en  route,  and  one  at  the  cremation  ground.  This  procedure 
is  called  simply  "ball  placing."  If  a  Brahmin  is  with  the  group  he 
deposits  these  and  chants  mantras;  otherwise  family  members  place 
them.  Sometimes  no  Brahmin  is  called  until  the  thirteenth-day  cere- 


406  APPENDIX   III 

mony,  and  almost  never  is  one  called  before  the  ceremony  which 
begins  on  the  seventh  day.  None  is  needed  during  cremation,  and  only 
in  a  lingering  death  is  one  called  to  preside  at  the  time  of  death.  In 
Sirkanda  the  Brahmin  called  is  the  same  one  called  for  weddings  or 
other  rituals,  but  the  traditional  charity  associated  with  death  cere- 
monies all  goes  to  the  traditional  Brahmin  or  purohit,  Tula. 

Cremation 

At  the  cremation  ground  the  body  is  placed  naked  on  a  layer  of 
wood  and  covered  with  oil  and  clarified  butter  and  then  covered  with 
more  wood.  Straw  is  stuffed  in  the  open  places  of  the  pyre. 

The  eldest  son  or  equivalent  relative  is  the  chief  mourner,  and  is 
called  "the  one  who  sits  for  the  kind  (postdeath)  ceremony,"  or  simply 
"keria."  He  should  be  at  least  eight  years  old;  otherwise  a  substitute 
is  generally  used.  If  a  child  plays  this  role  the  ceremonies  are  abbre- 
viated to  adjust  to  the  shorter  attention  span  and  lesser  stamina  of  the 
child.  The  chief  mourner  lights  the  pyre  near  the  head  of  the  body,  and 
others  assist,  lighting  elsewhere.  Then  as  the  fire  begins  the  chief 
mourner  has  his  head  shaved  and  is  for  thirteen  days  thereafter  ritually 
unclean.  After  the  fire  has  burned  down  and  the  head  of  the  corpse  is 
exposed,  the  chief  mourner  takes  a  pole  and  strikes  the  skull  seven 
blows  to  break  it,  dipping  the  pole  in  the  water  after  each  blow.  The 
most  sacred  parts  of  the  body,  because  life  leaves  them  last,  are  the 
heart  and  lungs,  called  collectively  tis.  As  the  fire  burns  down  an  effort 
is  made  to  keep  the  chest  cavity  from  being  entirely  consumed,  and 
before  it  is,  the  heart  and  lungs  or  fragments  thereof  are  removed  with 
a  stick.  They  are  tied  in  a  cloth  and  buried  in  the  river  under  a  large 
stone.  The  fire  is  then  rekindled  to  consume  the  body.  Thereafter 
the  remains  are  thrown  in  the  river  except  for  a  few  bones,  which  are 
kept  to  be  deposited  in  the  sacred  Ganges  at  a  convenient  date,  to  the 
accompaniment  of  a  puja  performed  by  priests  who  reside  there.  If 
cremation  is  held  at  the  Ganges,  all  the  remains  are  at  once  deposited 
in  the  river.  The  chief  mourner  then  bathes  in  the  river  and  the  party 
returns  to  the  village.  Before  leaving,  the  chief  mourner  picks  up  a 
stone  from  the  site  of  the  cremation  and  carries  it  home.  This  is  called  a 
lingra,  and  is  the  symbol  of  Shiva.  It  represents  the  fact  that  the 
deceased  is  now  one  with  Shiva,  though  the  average  villager  thinks 
of  it  primarily  as  representing  the  deceased. 

As  already  pointed  out  (p.  112),  it  is  often  said  that  actually  ghosts 
rather  than  flames  consume  the  body  during  cremation.  No  remains 
of  the  body  are  left,  especially  of  women,  lest  the  ghosts  utilize  them 
for  nefarious  purposes  or  their  own  sexual  enjoyment.  There  are 


APPENDIX    III  407 

magical  means  of  making  these  ghosts  visible,  but  it  is  a  dangerous 
undertaking.  Ghosts  are  prevented  from  following  the  funeral  party 
home  or  disturbing  the  ghost  of  the  deceased  by  being  imprisoned 
when  a  thorn  twig  is  placed  under  a  flat  stone  on  the  trail  and  each 
member  of  the  group  steps  on  it  as  he  passes.  On  the  way  home  the 
funeral  party  is  fed  by  the  family  of  the  deceased,  who  are  themselves 
fasting. 

Post-Cremation  Ceremonies 

Upon  arrival  of  the  funeral  party  back  in  the  village,  all  the  men 
turn  their  caps  inside  out  and  have  a  lock  of  hair  cut  off  as  a  sign  of 
mourning,  which  lasts  for  the  next  eleven  days.  The  men  are  also 
sprinkled  with  purifying  cow's  urine  by  the  women  of  their  families. 
The  male  household  and  lineage-fellows  of  the  deceased  continue  to 
fast  and  rest  until  the  next  day.  They  are  the  primary  mourners, 
and  in  funerals  of  unimportant  people  they  are  often  the  only  ones 
who  attend  the  cremation.  In  the  case  of  a  woman,  the  mourning  group 
is  her  husband's  lineage.  That  night  a  little  flour  is  spread  near  the 
door  of  the  house.  Early  the  next  morning  it  is  inspected  in  order  that 
the  fate  of  the  soul  may  be  detected.  If  there  is  a  bird  track  in  the 
flour  the  soul  has  entered  a  bird  and  there  is  rejoicing;  if  an  insect 
track  appears,  people  are  saddened.  During  the  next  thirteen  days 
relatives  and  friends  come  to  pay  their  respects  to  the  family  of  the 
deceased.  For  the  thirteen  days  after  cremation,  the  ghost  of  the  de- 
ceased wanders  about  and  is  sufficiently  feared  that  villagers  are  espe- 
cially reluctant  to  go  outside  at  night  during  this  period. 

At  this  juncture  the  course  of  ceremonies  can  vary,  depending  upon 
the  wealth  and  importance  of  the  deceased.  For  the  funeral  of  a  person 
of  no  great  import,  such  as  a  young  adult  and  especially  a  woman,  the 
ceremonies  will  consist  of  pujas  done  in  the  home  on  the  seventh  day 
followed  by  further  ceremonies  in  the  home  on  the  thirteenth  day, 
and  that  is  all.  For  a  more  important  funeral  the  four-day  ceremony 
called  das  karam  is  announced  and  is  carried  out  beginning  on  the 
seventh  day  and  ending  on  the  tenth,  and  followed  by  further  cere- 
monies on  the  thirteenth  day.  For  the  most  important  funerals  of  all, 
the  das  karam  plus  a  ceremony  on  the  first  annual  anniversary  of  the 
death,  called  barsotl,  is  announced. 

The  most  elaborate  of  these  possibilities  will  be  described  here  be- 
cause, though  it  is  infrequent,  it  is  the  ideal  and  the  lesser  ceremonies 
are  modifications  and  abbreviations  of  it. 

Das  karam  consists  of  elaborate  all-day  ceremonies  for  four  days 
performed  by  a  Brahmin  and  the  chief  mourner  assisted  by  the  barber. 


408  APPENDIX   III 

The  ceremonies  are  carried  out  for  two  days  at  the  village  water  source 
(that  is,  at  running  water),  then  one  day  at  a  pepil  tree  in  the  village, 
and  a  final  day  at  the  water.  The  Brahmin  performs  pujas  and  directs 
the  chief  mourner  in  his  actions  and  recitations  honoring  the  deceased 
and  securing  his  well-being.  The  barber  provides  leaf  packets  used  in 
the  ceremony  and  prepares  the  pipe  for  the  Brahmin's  use  as  he  works. 
There  is  no  need  to  describe  these  lengthy  ceremonies  beyond  men- 
tioning that  they  help  the  soul  of  the  deceased  in  its  progress  to  the 
next  stage  of  existence  and  include  ritual  recognition  of  the  184  stages 
of  life  through  which  the  soul  must  pass  before  achieving  release.  The 
rites  also  involve  the  giving  of  additional  charity  to  the  Brahmin. 
They  are  performed  in  accordance  with  prescriptions  contained  in  the 
Brahmin's  sacred  books  as  modified  by  economy,  necessity,  and  local 
tradition.4 

On  the  eleventh  day  the  men  who  attended  the  funeral  are  given 
haircuts  by  the  village  barber,  and  they  put  their  hats  on  right  side  out. 
On  the  following  day  the  chief  mourner  bathes,  is  shaved,  and  has  his 
hair  cut;  on  this  day  also,  daughters  and  sisters  of  the  deceased  come 
bearing  puris  (fried  bread).  Food  is  prepared,  and  the  barber  brings 
the  leaf  plates  for  serving  the  food. 

On  the  thirteenth  day  the  major  postdeath  ceremony,  term!  (thir- 
teenth), is  held.  A  puja  is  performed  and  the  purohit  is  given  more 
charity — a  cow,  a  bed,  bedding,  clothing,  an  umbrella,  and  a  pipe. 
A  cow  is  given  to  a  daughter  or  sister  of  the  deceased,  and  scarves  are 
given  to  his  other  female  relatives.  A  feast  ("bitter  food")  is  held  for  the 
entire  village  and  guests.  With  this,  the  mourning  period  is  over. 

Barsoti,  the  one-year  anniversary  of  death,  is  an  important  occasion, 
and  many  guests  and  many  Brahmins  are  invited  from  a  considerable 
distance  around  the  village.  A  puja  is  held,  charity  is  given,  and  a  great 
feast  is  held. 

When  barsoti  is  to  be  held,  the  chief  mourner  may  observe  some  aus- 
terities for  the  entire  year  before  its  performance:  perhaps  not  wear 
shoes,  not  sit  on  a  cot,  not  use  an  umbrella,  not  eat  meat  or  fried  food, 
nor  participate  in  festivals.  The  entire  family  may  refrain  from  ob- 
serving festivals,  and  the  entire  village  may  modify  or  delay  festivals 
during  the  year.  Any  festival  which  occurs  later  in  the  same  month  as 
a  death  is  usually  omitted  or  postponed  a  day  in  honor  of  the  deceased. 
Diwali  was  celebrated  only  one  day  instead  of  two  by  many  villagers 
in  1957  because  of  the  death  of  an  important  man  since  the  last 
Diwali.  Likewise,  Popria  Sakrant  was  delayed  a  day  because  of  the 
death  of  an  old  man  in  the  preceding  month. 

Widows  are  not  restricted  in  activity  or  dress,  as  they  often  are  in 


APPENDIX    III  409 

the  plains.  An  unremarried  widow  does  not,  however,  take  an  active 
part  in  birth  or  marriage  ceremonies.  Also,  she  does  not  wear  her  gold 
nose  ornaments  (the  symbols  of  marriage)  for  at  least  a  year  after  her 
husband's  death  or  until  she  remarries.  Some  do  not  again  wear  these 
ornaments  at  all,  or  not  until  their  sons  are  adult.  This  is  not  a  formally 
enforced  rule.  It  is  done  out  of  respect  for  the  husband,  and  the  length 
of  time  during  which  they  are  not  worn  is  a  publicly  recognized  index 
of  such  respect.  Widow  remarriage  is  universal  here  except  when  the 
widow  is  elderly.  A  young,  unremarried  widow  is  virtually  an  unknown 
phenomenon. 

A  ceremony  which  occurs  on  the  thirteenth  day  after  death  is  that 
of  the  lingrd  dhdrna  puja  (ceremony  in  which  the  lingra  are  placed).5 
For  thirteen  days  after  cremation  the  lingra  stone  brought  from  the 
cremation  ground  is  kept  outside  the  house  in  a  brass  tumbler.  Each 
morning  milk  is  poured  over  it  as  a  form  of  worship.6  On  the  thirteenth 
morning  a  Brahmin,  the  chief  mourner,  and  the  unmarried  girls  of  the 
family  go  to  a  place  just  outside  the  village  where  the  lingra  stones 
are  traditionally  placed.  In  Sirkanda  each  local  caste,  and  among  the 
Rajputs  each  clan,  has  a  boulder  used  as  a  shrine,  at  the  base  of  which 
the  lingra  stones  are  deposited.  All  the  high-caste  shrines  occupy  one 
small  area,  and  the  other  castes'  shrines  are  scattered  in  other  areas. 
The  Brahmin  conducts  a  puja  before  the  shrine,  places  the  stone, 
blesses  the  chief  mourner  and  the  young  girls,  and  receives  a  small 
amount  of  charity.  Villagers  assert  that  the  lingra  stones  gradually 
disappear  from  these  smaller  shrines,  one  or  a  few  at  a  time,  and  fly 
to  the  great  temple  and  place  of  pilgrimage  in  the  Himalayas, 
Badrinath.  As  a  result,  a  huge  pile  of  these  stones  is  at  that  temple 
and,  conversely,  there  are  never  very  many  at  the  shrine  in  the  village. 


APPENDIX    IV: 
SIRKANDA   KIN    TERMS 


Kinship  in  Sirkanda  has  been  discussed  in  some  detail  in  chapter  5. 
Terminology  used  to  designate  kin  is  presented  here  in  the  form  of  a 
table.  A  few  general  statements  of  explanation  regarding  the  table 
are  in  order. 

In  the  table,  terms  are  grouped  relative  to  ego,  horizontally  by 
generation,  and  vertically  by  consanguinity  (on  the  left)  and  affinity 
(on  the  right).  The  relationship  to  ego  of  the  person  to  whom  a  par- 
ticular term  is  applied  is  indicated  by  initials  as  follows: 

f-father  h-husband 

m-raother  S-son 

b-brother  d-daughter 

s-sister  e-elder 

w-wife  y-younger 

Thus,  for  example,  febd  means  father's  elder  brother's  daughter. 
Where  a  kin  term  appears  followed  by  an  =  sign,  the  term  to  the 
right  of  the  sign  is  the  term  used  by  ego  for  the  spouse  of  any  person 
indicated  to  the  left  of  the  sign.  Whether  the  spouse  is  husband  or  wife 
is  indicated  by  h  or  w,  respectively.  Thus,  the  =  sign  serves  the  func- 
tion of  a  horizontal  ditto,  precluding  the  necessity  of  repeating  all  the 
relatives  to  whose  spouses  a  term  refers. 

Kin  terms  are  numbered  consecutively  in  parentheses,  on  the  left, 


APPENDIX    IV  411 

for  purposes  of  identification  and  reference.  Numbers  in  brackets,  to 
the  right,  indicate  (at  the  first  occurrence  of  a  term)  other  places  where 
the  same  term  occurs. 

In  some  cases  Hindi  terms,  or  terms  apparently  derived  from  Hindi 
usage  in  the  nearby  plains,  are  in  frequent  use,  although  Pahari  terms 
are  also  known  and  used.  The  Hindi  or  Hindi-derived  term  is  in- 
dicated in  parentheses  below  the  Pahari  term.  In  some  cases  two  Pahari 
terms  are  known  or  used,  evidently  stemming  from  dialectal  differences. 
Then  the  alternative  usage  is  indicated  in  brackets  below  the  usage 
deemed  most  "proper"  by  informants. 

The  terms  "elder"  and  "younger"  refer  to  age  of  the  person  to 
whom  the  term  applies  relative  to  that  of  ego  in  the  case  of  con- 
sanguineal  kin  of  ego's  own  generation,  and  to  seniority  in  the  case  of 
affinal  kin  (determined  by  age  relative  to  that  of  the  connecting  kin) 
and  of  consanguineal  kin  of  generations  other  than  ego's  own  (deter- 
mined simply  by  generational  seniority).  Terms  which  apply  to  more 
than  one  of  the  categories  of  relatives  commonly  distinguished  in 
Pahari  kinship  (see  p.  191)  are  frequently  replaced  by  descriptive 
phrases  for  the  sake  of  specificity  in  reference.  Some  terms  are  used 
in  reference  only,  teknoymy  or  other  indirection  serving  in  address. 
These  are  asterisked  in  the  table.  In  address,  terms  are  frequently 
abbreviated,  and  not  infrequently  less  precise  terminology  is  used  than 
in  reference.  This  has  been  indicated  where  relevant. 

I  am  indebted  to  Mr.  A.  C.  Chandola,  linguist  from  Pauri,  Garhwal, 
and  a  former  graduate  student  at  the  University  of  California,  Berkeley, 
for  checking  these  kin  terms.  Despite  some  dialectal  differences  be- 
tween the  terms  he  knows  and  those  used  in  Sirkanda,  he  was  able  to 
clarify  a  number  of  points.  As  spoken  by  my  informants,  final  vowels 
in  these  terms  seemed  usually  to  be  long.  However,  I  am  informed  that 
actually  they  vary  freely  from  long  to  short.  Therefore,  I  have  in- 
dicated as  long  vowels  only  those  which  Mr.  Chandola  and  I  decided 
were  consistently  long.  Any  errors  in  terminology  or  transcription  are 
my  own. 


412 


APPENDIX    IV 


TABLE  8 
Sirkanda  Kin  Terms 
I.  Ego's  Generation 


Consanguineal  relatives 


Affinal  relatives 


(1)  e:  b,  fbS,  fsS,  dida  =     (5)  w  bau 

msS,  mbS 

(2)  y:  b,  fbS,  fsS,  bhula  [26]   = 

msS,  mbS 

(3)  e:  s,  fbd,  fsd,  dldi  [14]       = 

msd,  mbd 

(4)  y:  s,  fbd,  fsd,  bhuli  [15]    = 

msd,  mbd 


(6)  w  bwari  [9a,  70,  72,  78] 

(7)  h  jija 
(bahena)  [10a] 

(8)  h  jawai  [18a,  71,  73,  79] 
(said)  [11a] 

(9)  w  bairwdn  a 
(9a)  [bwari] 

(10)  webjeThu    =    (14)  w  dldi 
(10a)     (bahena) 

(11)  wyb  sydlu      =    (15)  w  bhuli 
(11a)  (so/a) 

(12)  wes  jeR  sdsu  =    (16)  h  saRu  bhai  a  [17] 

(jethdu)  [21a]         (mausa)  [25a,  40a, 
40c] 

(13)  wysyya/j         =    (17)  h  same  as  [16] 

(18)  h       manseru  a 
(18a)     [jawai] 

(19)  heb  jeThd  =  (23)  w  jeThdni  b 

(20)  hyb  ctyz/r    =  (24)  w  dyurdni  c 

(21)  hes  pwp/ze  sdsu  =  (25)  h  6Aa£  a 
(21a)  (jethdu)         =      (25a)  (maMja) 

(22)  hys  naA^d  =  (26)  h  bhula  d 

(nawdo) 

(27)  Swm,  dhm,  Swfs  samdhlN e 
Swms,  dhfs,  dhms  [5amrf/?aN'] 

(28)  Swf,  dhf,  Swfb  samdhi  e 
Swmb,  dhfb,  dhmb 


a  Term  of  reference  only. 

b  Term  of  reference;  term  of  address  is  dldi. 

c  Term  of  reference;  term  of  address  is  bhuli. 

d  Term  of  address;  term  of  reference  is  descriptive. 

e  Reciprocal  term. 


APPENDIX    IV 


413 


II.  First  Ascending  (Parental)  Generation 


Consanguineal  relatives 


Affinal  relatives 


(29)  f  baba 

(30)  feb  baDa  [40b] 

(31)  fyb  chacha  [40] 

(32)  fs(eandy)  puphu 

(36)  m  bdi 

[bwe]  (ma) 

(37)  mb  (e  and  y)  mama 


(38)  mys 
(38a)  mes 


nanbai 
[kansi  ma] 

nanbai  (?) 
[jeThl  ma] 


(33)  w    baDl 

(34)  w    chachl 

(35)  h     mama  [37] 

(puphd) 


(39)  w  mat 

(mami) 

(40)  h     chacha 
(40a)  (inausd) 

(40b)  h  baDa 
(40c)    (mama) 

(41)  wm,  wms,  wfs,  hm,         =  (44)  h  sasura  a 
hms,  hfs  sasu  a  [46] 

(42)  wmb,  hmb  mdsdsura  a  =  (45)  w  masdsu  a 

[mamya  sasura  a]  —  [mamya  sasu  a] 

(43)  wf,  wfb,  hf,  hfb  =  (46)  w  sasu  a 
sasura  a  [44] 

(47)  stepmother,     mausyaN f 
father's  co-wives 


III.  Second  Ascending  (Grandparental)  Generation 


Consantmineal  relatives 


Affinal  relatives 


(48)  ff,  ffb  (e  and  y)  ffsh,  fmsh   ddda 


(49)  fm,  fms,  ffbw 


dddi 


(54)  wmf,  hmf,  hmfb,       buDha  sasura 
wmfb,  wff,  hff,  hffb, 

wffb 

(55)  wfm,  hfm,  wmm,       buDhi  sasu 
hmm 


(50)  fmb  buDha 

(51)  ffs,  fmbw  buDhi 

(52)  mm,  mms,  mfbw,  mmbw,    ndni 

mfs(?) 

(53)  mf,  mfb,  mmb,  mmsh  nana 

1  Term  of  reference;   term  of  address  is  the  term  for  elder  mother  or  younger 
mother,  that  is,  the  same  as  terms  for  mother's  sisters  (38,  38a). 


4*4  APPENDIX    IV 


IV.  Further  Ascending  Generations 
Consanguineal  relatives  Affinal  relatives 

(56)  fff,  fffb  bhuDhadadas  [bhuDhadd]* 

(57)  ffm,  ffms,  fffs,  f ffbw  bhuDhi  dadi*    [bhuDhadl]* 

(58)  mff,  mmf  bhuDha  nana 

(59)  mfm,  mmm  bhuDhi  ndni 

(60)  ffff,  etc.  jhaRddda 

(61)  fffm,  etc.  jhaRdddi 

(62)  mfff,  mmff,  mmmf  jhaRndna 

(63)  mffm,mfmm,mmmm  jhaRndni 

(64)  fffff,  etc.  paRdada,  etc. 

(65)  ffffff,  etc.  naRdada,  etc. 

V.  First  Descending  (Children's)  Generation  • 

Cosanguineal  relatives  Affinal  relatives 

(66)  S,  bS  nihdl        =     (70)  w;  Sws,  dhs      bwarl 

(beta) 

(67)  d,  bd  nihdll      =     (71)  h;  Swb,  dhb     jawai 

(bed) 

(68)  sS        bhaNju    =     (72)  w  bwarl 

[bhaNja] 

(69)  sd        bhaNjl    =     (73)  h  jawai 

(74)  stepson  or  co-wife's  son  sautelu  a 

(75)  stepdaughter  or  co-wife's  daughter  sauteli* 
VI.  Second  Descending  (Grandchildren's)  Generation 

Consanguineal  relatives  Affinal  relatives 

(76)  SS,  bSS,  dS     ndtl  =  (78)  w  bwarl 

(77)  Sd,  bSd,  dd     ndtiN  =  (79)  h  jawai 

VII.  Other  Descending  Generations 

Consanguineal  relatives  Affinal  relatives 

(80)  SSS,  etc.  jhaRnatl       =  w  bwarl 

(81)  SSd,  etc.  jhaRnatlN    =  h  jawai 

(82)  SSSS,  etc.  paRndtl 

(83)  SSSd,  etc.  paRndtlN 

e  Term  of  reference;  term  of  address  is  ddda. 
h  Term  of  reference;  term  of  address  is  dddi. 

1  These  terms  are  reportedly  the  same  for  man-speaking  and   woman-speaking. 
Karve's  data  (1953,  pp.  93  f.,  104)  confirm  this. 


Notes 


Introduction 

1  As  was  explained  in  the  "Note  on  Hindi  Terms,"  "Sirkanda"  is  a  pseu- 
donym, as  are  the  names  used  for  other  villages  in  the  vicinity,  and  for  all 
individuals  mentioned  hereafter. 


Chapter  1     The  Setting 

1  The  western  boundary  of  the  Himalaya  West  is  the  Tons  River  (a  tribu- 
tary of  the  Jumna),  and  the  eastern  is  the  Kali  or  Sarda  River  the  boundary 
with  Nepal.  The  Himalaya  West  comprises  the  present  districts  of  Almora, 
Garhwal,  Tehri  Garhwal,  and  the  hill  sections  of  Naini  Tal  and  Dehra  Dun 
districts. 

2  Following  Lowie  (1947,  p.  111)  and  Murdock  (1949,  p.  47),  the  Pahari  sib 
can  be  defined  as  an  exogamous,  patrilineal,  consanguineal  kin  group  whose 
members  claim  common  descent  but  are  often  unable  to  trace  the  lines  of 
descent  accurately.  In  much  of  the  anthropological  literature,  including  some 
of  my  own  writings,  this  group  has  been  referred  to  as  the  clan  (cf.  chapter  5). 

3  Even  the  most  ethnocentric  foreigners  find  Paharis  to  have  admirable 
traits.  J.  B.  Fraser,  referring  to  a  Western  Pahari  group  whose  polyandry  he 
found  shocking,  had  this  to  say: 

It  is  remarkable,  that  a  people  so  degraded  in  morals,  and  many  of  whose 
customs  are  of  so  revolting  a  nature,  should  in  other  respects  evince  a  much 
higher  advancement  in  civilisation,  than  we  discover  among  other  nations,  whose 
manners  are  more  engaging  and  whose  moral  character  ranks  infinitely  higher. 
Their  persons  are  better  clad  and  more  decent;  their  approach  more  polite  and 


41 6  NOTES 

unembarrassed;  and  their  address  is  better  than  that  of  most  of  the  inhabitants 
of  the  remote  Highlands  of  Scotland;  .  .  .  and  their  houses,  in  point  of  con- 
struction, comfort  and  internal  cleanliness,  are  beyond  comparison  superior  to 
Scottish  Highland  dwellings.    (Fraser,  1820,  p.  209) 


Chapter  2     The  Economic  Context 

1  This  figure  is  the  one  used  in  official  accounting.  It  includes  the  176  acres 
around  Sirkanda  plus  29  acres  in  odrer  areas  included  with  Sirkanda  for  ac- 
counting purposes,  and  excludes  93  acres  which  in  the  accounts  are  included 
with  other  villages.  These  205  acres  represent  less  than  one-fourth  of  all 
lands  within  the  official  boundaries  of  Sirkanda.  The  remainder  is  unculti- 
vated. 

2  Rs.  is  the  abbreviation  for  rupee,  the  monetary  unit  worth  about  21^  in 
United  States  currency  in  1957-1958  (Rs.  4.75  =  11.00).  In  buying  power  in 
India,  a  rupee  is  approximately  equal  to  a  dollar  in  America. 

3  Scientific  names  of  plants  are  obtained  from  Atkinson  (1882),  who  pro- 
vides complete  listings  by  scientific  and  "vernacular"  names  of  both  domestic 
and  wild  plants  of  the  hills. 

4  A  maund  is  about  80  pounds.  A  maund  of  wheat  was  worth  about  Rs.  15 
in  this  area  at  this  time.  Wheat  is  a  standard  medium  of  exchange.  A  common 
way  to  report  income  is  to  estimate  its  value  in  wheat.  If  a  man  gets  Rs.  100  in 
cash  it  is  often  reported  as  "seven  maunds  of  wheat." 

5  Estimates  of  yearly  cash  expenditures  per  family  averaged  roughly  as  fol- 
lows: gur  (brown  sugar)  Rs.  100,  salt  Rs.  25,  kerosene  Rs.  20,  cooking  oil  Rs. 
150,  molasses  Rs.  8,  tobacco  and  cigarettes  Rs.  15,  cloth  and  bedding  Rs.  110, 
utensils  Rs.  15,  ceremonies  Rs.  80,  taxes  Rs.  12,  meat  and  drink  Rs.  70,  sweets, 
trinkets,  and  entertainment  Rs.  50,  proportional  year's  expenditures  on  house 
construction  Rs.  50  (figuring  the  life  of  a  house  at  forty  years  at  Rs.  2,000), 
livestock  Rs.  150.  Medical  expenses  are  included  in  the  total  for  ceremonies, 
as  medical  treatment  almost  always  takes  the  form  of  a  ceremony.  Education 
is  not  a  significant  extra  expense,  amounting  to  only  a  rupee  or  so  for  school 
supplies  to  those  families  with  school-going  children. 

Low-caste  expenditures  are  significantly  less  than  those  reported  above — 
perhaps  half  as  much.  The  low  castes  buy  fewer  and  less  expensive  clothes 
and  utensils,  eat  less  sugar,  own  fewer  livestock.  Their  weddings  are  inexpen- 
sive, their  houses  are  cheap,  and  they  depend  for  tobacco,  sweets,  entertain- 
ment, meat,  drink,  and  so  on  largely  on  handouts  from  the  high  castes. 

6  In  1958  he  withdrew  from  the  village  because  his  servant  left  and  he 
could  find  no  suitable  substitute.  He  was  gone  for  several  months,  and  the 
chances  of  his  returning  were  slim  because  he  was  ready  to  retire  and  his  sons 
did  not  want  to  work  in  this  isolated  spot,  preferring  instead  to  operate  the 
profitable  family  shop  in  Rajpur. 

7  The  occurrence  in  the  village  of  a  house  belonging  to  a  member  of  the 
Palial  sib  of  Rajputs  in  a  line  of  houses  owned  by  Jawari  sib  members  is  due 
to  such  a  case,  which  also  involved  a  chan  at  the  southwest  end  of  the  village 


NOTES  417 

(see  map  3).  Two  other  village  houses  whose  occupant-owners  are   isolated 
from  their  sib  fellows  can  probably  be  accounted  for  in  the  same  way. 


Chapter  3     The  Supernatural 

1  There  are  Pahari  Muslims  who  are,  except  for  religion,  indistinguishable 
from  other  Paharis.  One  such  family  lives  in  Bhatbair,  and  a  boy  of  that 
family  attends  the  Sirkanda  school.  Other  Pahari  Muslims  live  in  Tehri 
Garhwal.  There  have  also  been  a  few  Pahari  converts  to  Christianity  among 
the  Doms  of  Tehri  Garhwal.  However,  no  missionary  has  ever  come  to  Sir- 
kanda or,  so  far  as  I  could  determine,  to  Bhatbair. 

2  The  term  "pujari"  also  refers  to  individuals  who  are  the  keepers  of  par- 
ticular temples  and  who  supervise  worship  and  receive  offerings  to  the  deities 
of  such  temples.  In  this  account  they  will  be  called  "temple  keepers"  to  avoid 
confusion.  Temple  keepers  are  usually  of  high-caste,  and,  though  they  pre- 
side over  the  pujas  to  a  particular  god,  their  functions  are  entirely  distinct 
from  those  of  the  specialists  described  in  the  text. 

3  For  a  description  of  these  gods  and  their  worship  see  Appendix  IA. 

4  For  a  description  of  the  characteristics  and  manner  of  worship  of  these 
gods  see  Appendix  IB. 

Chapter  4     Calendrical  and  Life-Cycle  Ceremonies 

1  For  further  description  of  these  ceremonies  see  Appendix  IIIA. 

2  For  a  description  of  each  of  these  types  of  marriage  see  Appendix  IIIB. 

3  Karve  notes,  "All  over  India  there  is  the  custom  of  giving  bride-price 
among  the  poorer  castes  and  of  receiving  dowry  among  the  higher  castes" 
(Karve,  1953,  p.  132). 

4  M.  E.  Opler  (1959a)  has  discussed  in  some  detail  the  religious  functions 
of  the  family  in  Senapur.  The  situation  he  described  is  parallel  to  that  in 
Sirkanda. 

5  Of  course  "local  Hinduism"  can  be  used  to  denote  local  practices  regard- 
less of  their  origins  and  affinities,  but  the  implication  of  local  origin  or  local 
spread  must  be  avoided. 

Chapter  5     Kin  Groups  and  Kinship 

1  In  Sirkanda  the  word  "jat"  or  "jati"  refers  to  either  the  endogamous 
caste  or  to  the  exogamous  sib.  Since  it  literally  means  "birth"  or  "lineage," 
this  is  not  surprising.  Both  caste  and  sib  are  determined  by  birth.  Hocart 
(1950,  pp.  32  f.)  has  discussed  the  word  "jati,"  pointing  out  that  it  "has  much 
wider  and  looser  a  meaning  than  we  have  put  upon  the  Portuguese  creation 
'caste.'  It  does  not  refer  to  any  particular  kind  of  division  or  grouping,  but 
simply  to  hereditary  status." 

As  was  noted  in  note  2  of  chap.  1,  in  much  of  the  anthropological  litera- 


418  NOTES 

ture  the  group  here  referred  to  as  the  sib  is  called  the  clan.  I  have  decided  to 
follow  Murdock's  usage  because  his  distinction  between  sib  and  clan  is  rel- 
evant to  an  understanding  of  Pahari  social  organization,  for  reasons  to  be 
explained  below.  Villagers  of  the  plains  often  refer  to  the  sib  as  gotrd. 

2  The  differences  between  these  figures  are  attributable  to  records  of  mar- 
riages of  now-deceased  men  or  men  no  longer  identified  with  Sirkanda.  The 
471  figure  includes  marriages  of  Sirkanda  women,  most  of  whom  have  gone 
elsewhere  at  marriage. 

3  One  of  these  marriages  is  the  three-wife  family,  in  which  two  wives  occupy 
one  dwelling  and  the  third  another. 

4  Perhaps  in  certain  other  Pahari  areas  there  is  greater  laxity,  especially 
between  Rajputs  and  Brahmins.  Saksena  states,  for  Jaunsar-Bawar,  "As  inter- 
marriage between  Brahmans  and  Rajputs  is  easily  possible,  but  not  outside, 
they  constitute  a  single  endogamous  group.  .  ."  (Saksena,  1955,  p.  28;  cf. 
Majumdar,  1944,  pp.  115,  138). 

5  The  53  Rajput  marriages  include  several  with  people  of  these  sibs  who 
come  from  houses  in  the  immediate  vicinity  of  Sirkanda  but  who  are  not 
identified  as  members  of  the  village.  Since  these  cases  added  to  the  size  of 
the  sample  and  brought  in  no  extraneous  factors,  they  have  been  included  in 
the  discussion. 

6  This  means  that  77  Sirkanda  people  found  mates  within  the  village.  The 
number  represents  approximately  half  as  many  marital  unions,  since  it  takes 
two  to  make  a  marriage,  although  polygynous  and  sequential  marriages  bring 
the  total  up  somewhat.  In  addition,  one  barber  woman  lived  as  wife  of  a 
weaver  man  who  resided  in  Sirkanda  temporarily. 

7  Majumdar  found,  in  an  exogamous  Pahari  village  in  Jaunsar-Bawar,  that 
35  per  cent  of  the  Rajput  marriages  were  contracted  within  three  miles  and 
only  8  per  cent  were  contracted  over  12  miles  away.  He  found  similar  pro- 
portions among  the  low  castes  of  the  village  (Majumdar,  1955,  p.  172). 

8  The  barber  caste,  being  nonindigenous  to  this  area,  must  go  outside  to 
seek  mates  or,  as  is  often  done,  take  them  from  other  low  castes. 

Only  two  Sirkanda  marriages  were  contracted  more  than  18  miles  distant. 
These  were  of  the  women  sold  to  outsiders.  One  of  the  two  women  went  to 
Delhi,  the  other  to  the  Punjab,  each  some  150  miles  distant. 

9  Jain  (1948)  reports  that  of  605  women  interviewed  in  Jaunsar-Bawar, 
nearly  half  had  been  divorced  one  or  more  times,  and  145  of  those  undivorced 
were  still  young  enough  that  he  felt  they  still  might  become  divorced.  Majum- 
dar reports  that  in  a  village  of  Jaunsar-Bawar  62  per  cent  of  the  Rajput 
women,  and  55  per  cent  of  the  low-caste  (Kolta)  women,  had  been  divorced 
one  or  more  times.  In  each  case  almost  as  many  had  been  divorced  two  or 
more  times  as  had  been  divorced  once  (Majumdar,  1955,  p.  172). 

10  Some  of  this  material,  including  fig.  4,  has  appeared  in  Berreman,  1962c 

11  If  a  married  daughter  happens  to  be  visiting  her  parents  at  the  time  of 
a  funeral  or  other  ceremony  in  which  her  natal  family  participates,  she  joins 
them,  even  though  she  would  not  participate  if  she  were  at  that  time  living 
in  her  husband's  house.  Her  sib  affiliation  obligates  her  to  participate  when 


NOTES  4 1 9 

she  is  in  the  local  sib  group,  even  if  only  temporarily;  that  is,  sib  affiliation 
in  such  a  case  overrides  clan  affiliation.  Clan  affiliation  might  be  explained  as 
entirely  a  matter  of  place  of  residence — however  temporary — among  those 
affiliated  by  consanguinity  or  affinity  with  the  core  sib  of  the  clan.  That  is, 
it  may  not  be  inaccurate  to  say  that  whether  a  woman  is  considered  a  mem- 
ber of  her  parents'  or  her  husband's  clan  depends  upon  whose  house  she  is 
staying  in  at  the  moment. 

12  "Descent,  in  fine,  does  not  necessarily  involve  any  belief  that  certain 
genealogical  ties  are  closer  than  others,  much  less  a  recognition  of  kinship 
with  one  parent  to  the  exclusion  of  the  other.  ...  It  merely  refers  to  a 
cultural  rule  which  affiliates  an  individual  with  a  particular  selected  group  of 
kinsmen  for  certain  social  purposes  such  as  mutual  assistance  or  the  regula- 
tion of  marriage"  (Murdock,  1949,  p.  16).  In  Sirkanda  maternal  ties  are  recog- 
nized and  prominent.  This  is  made  explicit  in  the  kindred  or  sapinda  rules 
of  marriage  regulation,  in  kindred  participation  in  marriage  and  other  life- 
cycle  rites,  and  in  kinship  terminology. 

Chapter  6     Caste 

1  Blunt,  1931,  p.  5;  Bougie,  1908,  pp.  1  ff.;  Brown,  1953,  p.  30;  Davis,  1949, 
pp.  378  f.;  Duraont  and  Pocock,  1958,  pp.  7  ff.;  Ghurye,  1952,  pp.  2  ff.; 
Hocart,  1950,  pp.  3  ff.;  Hutton,  1946,  pp.  42,  44;  Kroeber,  1930,  p.  254;  Leach, 
i960;  Nadel,  1954;  O'Malley,  1932,  pp.  1  f.;  Ryan,  1953,  p.  19;  and  Srinivas, 
1952,  pp.  24  ff.  Gilbert  (1948)  lists  over  5,000  references  on  caste  and  gives  17 
sample  definitions  as  well  as  one  of  his  own. 

2  This  definition  incorporates  the  elements  most  frequently  included  in 
definitions  of  caste  in  the  literature.  See,  for  example,  Blunt,  1931,  p.  5; 
Brown,  1953,  p.  30;  Davis,  1949,  pp.  378  f.;  Ghurye,  1952,  pp.  2-30;  and 
Kroeber,  1930,  p.  254.  In  a  survey  of  definitions  of  twelve  authors,  it  was 
found  that  in  addition  to  the  criteria  listed  in  this  minimal  definition,  only 
"distinct  occupational  and  /  or  ethnic  tradition,"  and  "restrictions  on  eating 
(commensality)"  were  mentioned  with  comparable  frequency. 

3  In  this  area  kachchd  food  is  that  cooked  in  water,  pakkd  food  that  cooked 
in  oil  or  parched.  Kachcha  food  is  easily  polluted  and  can  be  eaten  only  if 
cooked  and  handled  by  one's  own  caste  or  a  higher  caste.  Pakka  food  is  much 
less  vulnerable  to  pollution  and  can  be  eaten  by  a  wider  range  of  castes.  In 
Sirkanda  foods  cooked  in  oil  are  considered  less  immune  to  pollution  than 
parched  foods. 

4  If  a  Dom  is  greeting  a  non-landowning  Brahmin,  he  may  say  "Samani 
Pundit."  The  derivation  of  the  word  "samani"  is  not  definitely  known.  One 
writer  thinks  it  derives  from  "Shivaman,"  made  up  of  the  words  "Shiva" 
(the  god)  and  mandna  (to  honor).  He  interprets  the  greeting  as  an  entreaty 
by  indigenous  Doms  for  their  Indo-Aryan  conquerors  to  honor  or  worship  the 
Doms'  deity,  Shiva  (Bahadur,  1916,  pp.  73  f.).  A.  C.  Chandola  suggests  more 
plausibly,  in  a  personal  communication,  that  it  derives  from  the  word 
samnydn,  meaning  to  bow  properly.  As  a  greeting,  "samani"  is  used  among 


4-20  NOTES 

all  castes  and  is  always  given  first  by  the  person  of  inferior  status.  If  two 
people  are  of  the  same  caste,  then  it  is  given  first  by  the  person  of  junior 
generation  or  relationship,  and  if  these  are  equivalent,  then  by  the  younger 
of  the  two.  Only  low  castes  addressing  high  castes  use  the  honorific  title  in 
conjunction  with  the  greeting. 

5  In  such  statements  the  terms  "high  caste"  and  "low  caste"  are  literally 
translatable  as  "big  caste"  and  "little  caste,"  that  is,  big  and  small  in  the 
sense  of  important  and  unimportant,  as  a  "big  man"  (district  magistrate)  and 
a  "small  man"  (peasant). 

6  There  is  one  family  of  Muslims  in  Bhatbair.  They  came  from  Tehri 
Garhwal  about  three  generations  ago  and  bought  land  from  a  Brahmin. 
They  are  Pahari  agriculturists  and  are  indistinguishable  from  other  Paharis 
except  in  their  religion.  Their  status  position  is  ambiguous.  All  castes  claim 
superiority  to  them  and  practice  ritual  avoidance  of  them.  In  social  relations, 
however,  they  rank  about  equivalent  to  weavers  who  are  their  neighbors. 
They  are  not  really  incorporated  into  the  local  caste  hierarchy,  and  they 
marry  exclusively  with  Muslims  in  Tehri  Garhwal  or  the  valley. 

7  William  Rowe  (in  a  personal  communication)  has  pointed  out  that  a 
similar  mechanism  for  resolution  of  the  low-caste  dilemma  of  mobility  aspira- 
tions and  dharma  is  to  blame  one's  own  unalterable  fate  for  failure  to  attempt 
to  move  up.  There  may  simply  be  no  use  trying  to  improve  one's  condition  if 
it  is  determined  by  fate. 

Chapter  7     Intercaste  Relations 

1  At  the  Bhatbair  fair  most  of  the  women  in  attendance  were  of  low  castes 
while  many  of  the  men  were  of  high  castes,  and  the  sexual  activities  among 
them  were  a  prominent  feature  of  the  fair.  There  is  also  the  well-known  fact 
that  Pahari  girls  who  become  prostitutes  are  usually  of  low  castes,  as  are  all 
of  the  traditionally  available  singing  and  dancing  girls. 

Chapter  8     The  Village  Community 

1  In  the  context  of  informal  village  social  interaction,  clans  and  sibs  are 
almost  synonymous,  the  sib  forming  the  core  and  including  wives  of  sib  mem- 
bers. The  named  groups  are  sibs,  and  the  corresponding  interacting  groups 
are  thought  of  as  sibs  by  villagers  but  are  usually  clans.  This  should  be 
borne  in  mind  throughout  the  chapter. 

Chapter  10     Conclusion 

1  The  history  of  Pahari  contacts  may  also  be  a  factor.  Seclusion  of  women 
in  India  is  attributable  in  large  part  to  Moghul  rule.  Apparently  people  of 
the  hills  escaped  most  of  this  influence,  and  those  plains  people  who  came 
to  the  hills  in  Moghul  times  were  among  the  ones  who  resisted  Moghul  in- 
fluence most  strongly. 


NOTES  42 1 


APPENDIXES 

Appendix  I 

1  The  coconut  is  a  sacred  object  in  Hindu  ritual  and  is  known  in  Sirkanda 
as  Sirlpal  (honored  fruit).  Its  sacredness  is  attributed  vaguely  by  villagers  to 
its  supposed  similarity  of  construction  to  that  of  the  parts  of  the  universe  or 
earth.  It  is  used  in  the  Sirkanda  area  upon  four  ceremonial  occasions:  (1)  in 
worship  of  Gauril  as  sacrifice  to  Gardevi;  (2)  in  worship  of  the  village  goddess 
Devi  (Durga)  to  win  her  support  in  any  situation  in  which  it  is  needed,  in- 
cluding the  weather-influencing  rites;  (3)  in  honor  of  Devi  in  the  village- 
protection  rite  (Mundkile);  (4)  as  a  symbolic  gift  by  the  bride's  father  to  the 
groom  in  dowry  marriage.  Only  in  the  wedding  ceremony  is  it  not  treated  in 
every  way  as  an  animal  sacrifice  in  apparent  substitution  therefor,  even  to  the 
point  of  being  divided  among  the  worshipers  to  be  consumed  after  the  puja. 
The  coconut  is  the  appropriate  offering  for  Devi  at  the  well-known  Kuddu 
Kal  mandir. 

2  Crooke  relates  such  objects  to  the  stones  (such  as  the  lingra  discussed  be- 
low) which  he  says  are  believed  by  people  in  several  parts  of  India  to  be  the 
abodes  of  the  spirits  of  the  dead.  He  describes  worship  of  such  stones  and 
then  notes  that  "instead  of  stones  the  Bharvad  shepherds  use  in  the  rite  small 
copper  plates  on  which  a  human  figure  is  engraved  by  the  village  gold- 
smith .  .  ."  (Crooke,  1926,  p.  319). 

Appendix  II 

1  It  is  reported  by  Pant  (1935,  p.  231)  for  the  Kumaon  districts  as  Phooldeyi 
(called  Goga  in  the  Chakrata  Himalayas).  He  says  that  it  celebrates  the 
coming  of  the  flowers  and  the  advent  of  the  Hindu  New  Year. 

Appendix  III 

1  The  social  considerations  taken  into  account  in  arranging  a  marriage — 
caste,  sib,  and  so  on — are  discussed  in  chapter  5.  An  excellent  account  of  cus- 
tomary law  dealing  with  marriage  can  be  found  in  Joshi  (1929).  His  descrip- 
tion corresponds  in  almost  every  detail  with  my  data  collected  without  benefit 
of  his  book. 

2  In  a  marriage  witnessed  by  the  author,  the  bride  and  groom  had  been 
found  to  have  incompatible  horoscopes.  Instead  of  calling  off  the  union  as 
would  normally  be  done,  the  Brahmin  recommended  that  the  marriage  be 
performed,  with  the  groom's  eldest  brother  playing  the  role  of  groom  and 
then  exchanging  places  with  the  groom  after  the  ceremonies.  This  was  done 
despite  some  objection  from  one  or  two  villagers  and  considerable  incredulity 
among  outsiders  who  came  to  know  of  it.  The  intended  husband  acted  as 
would  any  other  brother  of  the  groom  during  the  ceremonies  and  entered  the 


422  NOTES 

picture  only  after  the  entire  wedding  and  post-wedding  observances  had  been 
concluded.  No  other  such  arrangement  had  occurred  in  the  memory  of  vil- 
lagers. The  possibility  of  a  marriage  of  this  kind  is  noted  by  Joshi  (1929, 
p.  109).  A  similar  arrangement  but  for  different  reasons  is  noted  by  Majumdar 
among  the  Jaunsaris,  where  in  the  polyandrous  family,  he  says,  "If  a  brother 
wants  to  marry  any  particular  girl  of  his  choice,  the  eldest  brother  goes 
through  the  ceremony  of  marriage  with  the  girl  and  he  may  assign  the  bride 
to  the  particular  brother"  (Majumdar,  1944,  p.  144). 

3  Crooke  notes: 

It  is  believed  that  the  stability  inherent  in  a  stone  is  communicated  to 
those  who  sit  on  it  or  touch  it.  In  the  Vedic  age  the  bridegroom  caused 
the  bride  to  mount  a  stone,  formally  grasped  her  hand,  and  led  her  round 
the  household  fire.  In  modern  usage  a  stone,  supposed  to  represent  the 
goddess  Parvati  or  Devi,  is  erected  in  the  marriage  shed,  the  top  of  it  is 
smeared  with  vermilion.  .  .  .  The  bride  approaches  the  stone  and  touches 
it  with  her  foot,  or  the  bridegroom,  stooping  down,  takes  the  bride's  great 
toe  in  his  hand  and  with  it  touches  the  stone.  ...  In  the  northern  plains 
the  stone  is  seldom  used,  but  the  bride  knocks  over  a  couple  of  piles  of  rice 
laid  on  the  ground  (Crooke,  1926,  p.  321). 

4  A  detailed  account  of  these  ceremonies  as  outlined  in  the  religious  books 
used  by  Brahmins  in  Kumaon  can  be  found  in  Atkinson,  1884a,  pp.  917  ff. 
Those  in  Sirkanda  are  very  similar  but  were  not  recorded  in  detail. 

5  This  ceremony  is  not  reported  for  villages  in  the  plains,  but  Crooke 
mentions  similar  use  of  stones  for  the  dead  in  Bombay,  the  Deccan,  Baroda, 
and  other  areas  (Crooke,  1926,  pp.  234,  319)- 

Chodhras  in  Baroda  after  the  funeral  send  a  relation  of  the  deceased  to 
fetch  a  stone  from  a  river-bed.  This  is  kept  in  the  house  and  the  Bhagat 
soothsayer  is  summoned.  Under  his  supervision  wine  is  poured  on  it,  it  is 
taken  in  procession  with  music  to  the  place  appointed  for  such  stones,  it 
is  there  half  buried  in  the  ground  or  left  exposed,  rice  and  wine  are  poured 
on  it,  a  chicken  is  sacrificed  on  it,  and  a  lamp  fed  with  ghi  is  lighted  upon 
it.  (Crooke,  1926,  p.  319) 

6  This  is  reminiscent  of  the  milk  offerings  poured  over  the  lingam  in  Shiva 
temples  on  the  plains. 


Index 


Accountant,  village,  316 

Adoption,   163-164,   185-186 

Affinal  relatives,  167-169,  194.  See  also 
Kindred 

Age  roles,  238,  253,  260-261,  267 

Agriculture,  45-50 

Alcohol.  See  Liquor 

Amoral  familism,  323-324.  See  also  Senti- 
ments 

Ancestors:  as  spirits,  110-111,  386-387; 
worship  of,   111,  390-391 

Animal  husbandry,  50-52 

Annual  ceremonies.  See  Calendrical  cere- 
monies 

Army:  contacts  with,  277,  300;  villagers 
in,  72,  207,  300-301,  310 

Artisans.  See  Low  castes 

Arya  Samaj,  224 

Aspirations,  86.  See  also  Sentiments 

Atkinson,  E.  T.,  6,  11,  12,  19,  20,  21,  94, 
107,  108,  121,  124,  126,  130,  151,  188, 
208,  215,  221,  280,  378,  388,  389,  390, 
392-393.  395-  397.  404.  416  n.  3,  422 
n.  4 

Authority.  See  Caste,  dominant;  Family; 
Government,  agents  of  authority;  In- 
fluence; Village  government 

Bacon,  E.,  348 

Baden-Powell,  B.  H.,  26;  283 

Bahadur,  R.  P.  R.,  7,  12,  21,  29,  30,  107, 

181,  202,  346,  419  n.  4 
Bailey,  F.  G.,  198,  202,  255,  259 
Bajgi,   15,  61;   economic  role  of,   65-66; 


rank  of,  214,  216.  See  also  Low  castes 
Baki,  89.  See  also  Shamans 
Banfield,  E.  C,  323,  324 
Barber,  61;   economic  role  of,  65;   rank 

of,  213,  216.  See  also  Low  castes 
Basham,  A.  L.,  199,  347 
Basketmaker.  See  Bajgi 
Beals,  A.,  315 

Beda.  See  Singers  and  dancers 
Beekeeping,  52-53 
Beidelman,  T.  O.,  57 
Bendix,  R.,  223 
Berreman,  G.  D.,  3,  23,  31,  57,  78,  82, 

89,    102,    115,   133,    143,    150,    159,    171, 

186,   198,   199,  229,  243,  244,  257,  264, 

337-  338-  343.  346,  35°.  35 >.  353.  355. 

386,  418  n.  10 
Bhagwan.  See  Fate 
Bhaichara.  See  Land,  tenure  on 
Bhatbair,  23,  24  (map),  25-27,  294-295, 

299 
Bhotiya,  7,  14,  18,  23,  299,  349 
Bhut.  See  Ghosts 

Birth  ceremonies,  126-127,  395-397 
Blacksmith,  61;  economic  role  of,  63-65; 

rank  of,  213,  216.  See  also  Low  castes 
Blunt,  E.  H.  H.,  419  nn.  1  and  2 
Bose,  N.  K.,  257 
Bougie,  C.,  419  n.  1 

Boundary  rite.  See  Mundkile  ceremony 
Brahmin,    14,    19-20,    199,   246;    priestly 

role  of,  61-62,   104-105,   114-115,   125, 

133-136;    rank    of,    210-211.    See    also 

Ceremonies 


424 


INDEX 


Bride  price,  128-129,  354-355,  417  chap. 

4  n.  3 
Briffault,  R.,  347 
British  Garhwal.  See  Garhwal 
British  rule,  12-14,  26-27,  311-312,  317- 

318 
Brown,  W.  N.,  419  nn.  1  and  2 

Calendrical  ceremonies,  121-122,  123 
(table),   124-126,   388-394 

Carpenter-mason,  67.  See  also  Low  castes 

Cash  economy,  48-49,  50-51,  53-54,  55- 
57,  61-73  passim,  304-311,  416  n.  5. 
See  also  Wealth 

Caste,  197-200;  advantages  of,  to  high 
castes,  243-254;  allied,  208;  attitudes 
toward,  220-226,  235-236;  ceremonial 
participation  of,  125,  131-133;  changes 
in,  226-228,  254-256;  among  children, 
165-166;  in  community  development, 
325-326;  compared  to  Negro-white  re- 
lations in  U.S.,  243-254;  councils,  203- 
204;  deities,  109-110;  discrimination 
by,  109-110,  209,  237-238,  325-326;  di- 
visive effect  of,  257-258;  dominant, 
204-209,  326;  endogamy,  86,  149,  154- 
157;  identification  with,  339-343;  in- 
tegrative effect  of,  262-263;  interaction, 
229-242;  intermarriage,  154-157,  229; 
loyalty,  204-205;  maintenance  of  sys- 
tem, 254-256;  mobility,  141-142,  210- 
211,  220-225,  256-258;  ranking,  209- 
217;  sex  relations  and,  232-235,  247- 
250,  330;  socialization,  165-166;  stereo- 
types, 219-220;  vested  interests,  242- 
254,  343,  344.  See  also  Ceremonies; 
Family;  Gotra;  Low  castes;  Sib;  and 
specific  castes 

Census  of  India,  22,  208 

Central   Pahari.   See   Garhwal;    Kumaon 

Himalaya;    Pahari 
Ceremonies:    annual,    122-126,    388-394; 
life-cycle,  126-131,  395-409;  social  com- 
position   of    participating    groups    in, 

Chamar.  See  Shoemakers 

Chandola,  A.  C,  411,  419-420  n.  4 

Chans,  34-37 

Child  rearing,  75-77,  164-166 

Childhood  ceremonies,  126-127,  395-397 

Christians,  417  chap.  3  n.  1 

Chula.  See  Family,  joint 

Cicisbeism.  See  Wife  sharing 

Clan,    131-132,    183-187,   415   n.   2,   418- 

419  n.   11,  420  chap.  8  n.   1.  See  also 

Sib 


Class  differences,  217-219 
Climate,   10-11 

Cliques,  182,  264,  265-280.  See  also  Dis- 
putes 
Clothing  and  ornament,  30-31,  301,  306- 

3°7-  310 
Coconut  in   religion,  379,  381,  384,  421 

Appendix  I  n.  1 
Cohesion,  community,  262-265,  280,  336- 

338 
Cohn,  B.  S.,  81,   109,   122,   138,   140,  201, 

212,  222,  249,  255,  256 
Community.   See   Sirkanda   village;    Vil- 
lage community 
Community  Development  Program,  288- 

291,  318-320;  analysis  of,  321-330.  See 

also  Village  level  worker 
Conflict.  See  Disputes 
Congress   Party,   237,   286,  303,   315-318, 

325 
Contagious  magic,  118 
Cooperative  labor,  77,  324 
Corbett,  J.,  11 
Councils.  See  Panchayat 
Courts,  254,  270-275,  277,  282-283,  292- 

293.  3l6-3i7 
Credit   Cooperative   Program,   288,   290- 

291'  32°-33° 
Crime,  73-75,  270-271,  272,  282-283,  322 
Crooke,  W.,   106,   107,  108,  113,  383,  421 

Appendix  I  n.  2,  422  n.  3,  422  n.  5 
Crops,  45-50 
Cultural  drift,  350 
Culture  area.  See  Pahari 
Curers,  69,  116-117,  369-387  passim 

Dancing,  102,  125-126,  392,  402.  See  also 

Kalratra 
Dashera,  124,  391 
Davis,  K.,  419  nn.   1  and  2 
Death  ceremonies,  130-131,  404-409 
Dehra  Dun:  city,  9,  13  (map),  24  (map), 

72,  295,  301-302,  304,  307;  district,  12, 

13  (map),  14,  24  (map);  valley,  10 
Deities.  See  Gods 
Descent,  176,  193,  194;  caste,  222 
Devi,  101,  379-381 
Devta.  See  Gods 
Dharma,  86,   197,  223-224,  253-254.  See 

also  Fate 
Diet.  See  Food 
Disease.  See  Illness 
Disputes,    175,    230,    269-276;    tables   of, 

271,  274 
Diviners,  69,  1 15 
Division  of  labor  by  sex,  75-77 


INDEX 

Divorce,  160-163,  4J8  n.  9.  See  also  Mar- 
riage, second 

Diwali,  123,  125,  39!-393 

Dollard,  J.,  235,  243,  250,  255 

Dom,  14-15,  20-21,  211-217.  See  also 
Low  castes 

Domestic  animals.  See  Animal  hus- 
bandry 

Dominant  caste.  See  Caste,  dominant 

Dowry,   128,  402-403 

Drummer.  See  Bajgi;  Pujaris 

Dube,  S.  C,  1,  81,  82,  187,  199,  259,  321, 

325 
Dumont,  L.,  326,  419  n.  1 
Durga.  See  Devi 
Dwivedi,  J.  N.,  284 

Eastern  Pahari.  See  Pahari 

Ecology,  348,  351-352 

Economic  Cooperative  Supervisor  (ECS), 
320-321,  329-330.  See  also  Credit  Co- 
operative  Program 

Economy,  38-79,  245-247;  minor  activ- 
ities, 52-53 

Education,  165,  290,  300,  302-303,  306, 
330-335.  See  also  Teacher 

Elections,  285-286 

Elopement,  130 

Emigration,  35-36,  37,  71-73,  305 

Employment  outside.  See  Outside 

Endogamy.  See  Caste 

Engagement.  See  Marriage 

Entertainment,  93-94,  125-126,  239,  262, 
307-309,  327,  402 

Europeans.  See  Foreigners 

Evil  eye,  119-120 

Exogamy.    See    Sib;    Village    community 

Exorcists,  90,  112,  115-116 

Exploitation  of  low  castes,  59-61,  242-254 

Extended  family.  See  Family,  joint 

Extensions  of  village,  294-295,  335-338, 
340 

Factions.  See  Cliques;  Disputes 

Fairs,  57,  125-126,  133,  389-390,  420 
chap.  7  n.   1 

Family:  joint,  38,  144-148;  authority  in, 
166-169;  ceremonies  by,  122,  125;  dis- 
putes in,  175;  income,  53;  intrafamily 
relations,  166-176;  residence  in,  145 
(figure);  sex  relations  in,  171-174;  sta- 
bility and  division  of,  174-175;  trends 
in,  175-176;  worship  by,  86 

Family:  nuclear,  144-148,  174-175 

Fate,  83 

Felt  needs,  327-328,  335 


425 

Fictive  kinship,   195-196 

Food,  49-50,  227 

Foreigners,  298-300 

Forests,  nationalization  of,  312-315 

Fraser,  J.  B.,  415-416  n.  3 

Friendship,  266-269.  See  also  Cliques 

Funerary  rites.  See  Death  ceremonies 

Gadgil,  D.  R.,  257 

Gaikh.  See  Jajmani  system 

Gandhi,  M.  K.,  217,  330 

Gatiesh,  400 

Garhwal,  11-12,  13  (map),  14,  26,  28,  31, 
37,  128,  298.  See  also  Kumaon  Him- 
alaya 

Garhwali,  28.  See  also  Pahari 

Ghosts,   111-113,  406-407 

Ghurye,  G.  S.,  202,  419  nn.   1   and  2 

Gilbert,  W.  H.,  197,  419  n.  1 

Gods,  95-110,  369-386;  in  disputes,  89, 
97,  270-274,  282;  great  traditional,  107- 
109;  household,  96-98,  168,  369-374; 
village,  98-103,  374-386 

Goffman,  E.,  229 

Goldsmiths,  67.  See  also  Low  castes 

Gorer,  G.,  173 

Gotra,  187-191.  See  also  Clan;  Sib 

Gough  (Aberle),  K.,  199 

Gould,  H.  A.,  141,  224,  251,  264 

Government:  national  and  state,  in  Sir- 
kanda,  27-28,  301,  311-335;  agents  of 
authority  of,  315-318;  attitudes  to- 
ward, 44-45,  311-318;  British,  311-312, 
317-318;  failure  of  programs  of,  321- 
330;  successful  program  of,  330-335. 
See  also  Community  Development  Pro- 
gram; Congress  Party;  Credit  Cooper- 
ative Program;  Education;  Village  gov- 
ernment 

Great  tradition  of  Hinduism,  82;  and 
Pahari  Hinduism,  104-109,  122,  137- 
142 

Grierson,  G.  A.,  6,  13,  15,  16,  17,  19,  21, 
22,  347 

Gujar,  17 

Half-brothers,  146,  176 

Halwa,  50,  369-387  passim 

Harijan,  208,  217,  225.  See  also  Low 
castes 

Harper,  E.  B.,  90 

Health,  89.  See  also  Curers;  Illness; 
Medicine 

High  castes.  See  Brahmin;  Khasa;  Raj- 
put 

Himachal.  See  Kumaon 


426 


INDEX 


Himachal   Times,  313 

Himalaya,  Himalaya  West.  See  Ruraaon 

Hindi  terms:  transcription  of,  xii,  411; 
used  in  Sirkanda,   194-195 

Hinduism:  of  Khasas,  19;  of  Paharis,  80- 
82,  80-142  passim,  369-409  passim 

History:  of  Pahari  area,  11-21;  of  Sir- 
kanda, 28-30 

Hitchcock,  J.  T.,  187 

Hocart,  A.  M.,  202,  417  chap.  5  n.  1, 
419  n.  1 

Holi,  124 

Horoscope,  86,  396 

Household.  See  Family,  joint 

Household  gods.  See  Gods,  household 

Household  protection  rite,  98 

Houses,  32-33 

Hutton,  J.  H.,  419  n.  1 

Identification,  levels  of,  in  Sirkanda, 
295.  296  (figure),  297-299,  341   (figure) 

Identification  groups.  See  Reference 
groups 

Iijima,  S.,  348,  349 

Illegal  economic  activities,  73-74 

Illegitimacy,   153 

Illness,  116-117.  $ee  a^so  Curers;  Gods; 
Health;   Medicine 

Imitative  magic,  118 

Immigration,  36 

Incest,  86,  157-158 

Incorporeal  property,  78-79 

Independence  of  India,  27,  301.  See  also 
Government 

Influence,  283-284,  325.  See  also  Caste, 
dominant 

Inheritance,  42,  77-79,   186  (figure) 

Integration,    community.    See    Cohesion 

Intercaste  relations.  See  Caste,  interac- 
tion 

Intermarriage.  See  Caste,  intermarriage; 
Sex  relations,  intercaste 

Irrigation,  39,  47-48 

Jain,  S.  C,  418  n.  9 

Jajmani  system,  57-61 

Jat,  jati,  149,  417  chap.  5  n.   1.  See  also 

Caste;  Sib 
Jaunsar-Bawar,    7-8,    12,    13    (map),    14, 

150,  169,  297-298 
Joshi,  L.  D.,  7,  30,  78,  129,  149,  158,  188, 

421-422  n.  1 
Judicial  council,  292-293 

Kalratra,  91-92,   369-387  passim,  392 
Kanagat.  See  Ancestors;  Worship 


Karve,  I.,  158,  179,  188,  189,  193,  414, 
417  chap.  4  n.  3 

Kawakita,  J.,  348,  349 

Kedarkhand.  See  Garhwal 

Khajidan.  See  Lineage 

Khasa,  Khasiya,  14-20,  138-139.  See  also 
Rajput;  Brahmin 

Kin  terms,  194-196,  410-414;  for  non- 
kin,  195-196 

Kindred,  128,  158,  179-180 

Kinship,  191-196,  296,  339-342 

Kitt,  A.,  140 

Krishna,  390 

Kroeber,  A.  L.,  55,  419  nn.  1  and  2 

Kshatriya,  19,  igg.  See  also  Rajput 

Kumaon  districts,  11,  29 

Kumaon  hills,  10-11 

Kumaon  Himalaya,  9-14,  415  n.   1 


Lambardar.  See  Tax  collector 

Land,  39-45,  245;  tenure  on,  26-27,  41- 

43 
Land  reform,  312-315 
Language.  See  Pahari 
Law.  See  Crime;  Disputes;  Government; 

Inheritance;   Judicial   council;   Village 

government;  Panchayat 
Leach,  E.  R.,  197,  419  n.  1 
Leadership,  281,  283-284,  324-325 
Levirate,  79,  152-153 
Lewis,  O.,  81,  110,  122,  127,  187,  247,  249, 

258,  264,  265,  295,  325,  390,  397 
Life-cycle   ceremonies,    126-131,   395-409 
Lineage,  176,  177  (figure),  178-179 
Lingra,  185,  409,  422  n.  5 
Lipset,  S.,  223 
Liquor:    consumption    of,   94,   227,    239, 

240,  242,  402;  manufacture  of,  64,  66, 

73-74 

Literature  on  Paharis,  6-8 

Litigation.  See  Courts 

Little  tradition  of  Hinduism,  82 

Livestock.  See  Animal  husbandry 

Lohar.  See  Blacksmith 

Low  castes,  14-15,  20-21,  63-68;  accom- 
modation of,  to  status,  236-237,  254- 
256;  compensatory  gains  of,  253;  dis- 
advantages of  status  of,  242-254;  dis- 
crimination against,  226,  236,  237-238; 
place  of,  in  economy,  41,  59-61,  63-71; 
rank  of,  211-217;  rationale  and  resent- 
ment of  status  among,  84-86,  220-226; 
relations  among,  232-233;  relations  of, 
with  high  castes,  233-242,  255-256;  so- 
cial organization  of,   181-182,   190-191 


INDEX 


427 


Lower  Himalayas.  See  Kumaon 
Lowie,  R.  H.,   149,  415  n.  2 

Madan  (maidari),  92,  102 
Mahabharata,  8,  12,  15,  104,  381 
Mahadev.  See  Mahasu;  Shiva 
Mahar,  J.  M.,  70 

Mahar,  P.  M.,  81,  109,  136,  199,  210,  247 
Mahasu,  102,  107-109,  385-386 
Majumdar,  D.  N.,  8,   18,   19,  20,  21,  80, 

81,    143,   160,   169,   200,  201,   249,   346, 

347,  348,  418  nn.  4,  7,  9,  422  n.  1 
Mandelbaum,  D.  G.,  210 
Mandir.  See  Temple 
Mantra,  89 
Manu,  19,  138 
Marijuana,  74 

Markets.  See  Trade  and  Markets 
Marriage:   age  at,  153;  ceremonies,  127- 

130,  397-404,  421-422  Appendix  III  n. 

2;  cross-caste,  154-157,  229;  kin  groups 

in,    184-185,   188-190,  397-404;   matri- 

local,    78-79,     183-187;     networks,    24 

(map),  159-160,  350;  regulations,  148- 

150;  second,  129-130,  160-163 
Marriott,  M.,  81,  82,  103,   110,   122,  123, 

124,  138,  199,  202,  390 
Mass  media,  303-304 
Material    culture,    32-33,    310-311,    345- 

346.  See  also  Clothing  and  ornament; 

Houses 
Matri,  98,  377-379 
Matris.  See  Sprites 
Mayer,  A.  C,  208 
Mayne,  H.,  348 
Medicine,     69,     89,     116-117.     See     also 

Curers;   Illness 
Merchants.  See  Shops  in  Sirkanda;  Trade 

and  markets;  Vaishya 
Merton,  R.  K.,  140 
Milk  products,  50-51,  317 
Missionaries,  417  chap.  3  n.  1 
Mistri,  213,  216 
Mobility.  See  Caste,  mobility;  Plainsward 

mobility;  Reference  groups;  Sanskriti- 

zation 
Moiety,  188,  189 
Morgan,  K.  W.,  81,  82,  124 
Mortality,  infant,  164 
Mother  goddess.  See  Devi;  Matri 
"Mountaineer"    [Mr.   Wilson   of   Musso- 

orie],  6-7 
Mourning.  See  Death  ceremonies 
Mukhia,  78 

Mundkile  ceremony,  102,  133,  383-385 
Munshi,  K.  M.,  8,  347 


Murder,  282-283 

Murdock,  G.  P.,  148,  149,  176,  179,  183, 

184,  188,   189,  191,  193,  415  n.  2,  417- 

418  n.  1,  419  n.  12 
Muslims,  209,  224,  301,  417  chap.  3  n.  1, 

420  n.  6 
Mussoorie,  9,  13,  24  (map),  31,  295,  301- 

302 

Nadel,  S.  F.,  419  n.  1 

Nai.  See  Barber 

Naming,  126-127,  396 

Nepal,  12,  18 

Nevill,  H.  R.,  6 

Newcomb,  T.  M.,  336 

Newell,  W.  H.,  8,  280,  315 

Niehoff,  A.,  257,  305 

Non-Pahari  contacts,  299-304 

Nyaya  Panchayat.  See  Judicial  council 

Oakley,  E.  S.,  6,  114,  220 

Occupational    variation,    70-71 

Occupations,  noncaste,  69 

Offerings,  religious,  93,  227,  369-387  pas- 
sim 

Olcott,  M.,  257 

O'Malley,  L.  S.  S.,  199,  257,  419  n.  1 

Omens,  120 

Opler,  M.  E.,  81,  89,  90,  133,  138,  242, 
255.  259.  295.  325.  336-  417  chap.  4  n.  4 

Outside:  contacts  with,  31-32,  299-304, 
335-338;  employment  in,  71-73,  305- 
307.  See  also  Government;  Urban  con- 
tacts 

Outsiders,  295-304,  321-323 

Pahari,  13  (map),  14;  culture  area,  136- 
i37>  !43-  294-295,  342,  344-351.  35i- 
357;  language,  14,  16-17,  21-23;  peo- 
ple, 14-21,  28;  self-conceptions  of,  85- 
86,  251-252,  298-299,  356;  sources  on, 
6-8.  See  also  Dom;  Khasa;  Kumaon 

Panchayat,  28,  280-283,  284-292,  326; 
caste  and,  203;  in  disputes,  154,  227, 
270-275,  278;  in  divorce,  161.  See  also 
Judicial  council;  Village  government 

Pandavas,  101-102,  104,  178,  381-385 

Pant,  S.  D.,  7,  11,  47,  349,  421  Appendix 
II  n.  1 

Pargiter,  F.  E.,   17 

Passin,  H.,  198 

Peasant  society,   1,  55 

Perelman,  S.  J.,  309 

Phratry.  See  Gotra 

Physical  appearance,  of  Doms,  21;  of 
Khasas,    18;   of  Sirkanda  residents,  30 


428 


INDEX 


Pilgrimage,   103 

Plains,  10;  emulation  of,  see  Plainsward 
mobility;  Sanskritization 

Plainsward  mobility,  128-129,  134-137, 
141,  227-228 

Planalp,  J.  M.,  81,  90,  109,  122,  389,  397 

Planning  Commission,  Government  of 
India,  208,  292,  318 

Pocock,  D.,  326,  419  n.  1 

Police,  245,  315-317.  See  also  Govern- 
ment, agents  of  authority  of 

Political  organization.  See  Caste,  domi- 
nant; Government;  Influence;  Village 
government 

Pollution,  ritual,  198-199 

Polyandry,  150,  354-355.  421-422  Ap- 
pendix III  n.  2 

Polygyny,  148,  150-154,  171 

Population:  by  age  and  sex,  35  (figure); 
of  Bhatbair,  23,  44;  by  caste,  208 
(table);  by  family  types,  147  (table); 
Pahari-speaking,   22;    of  Sirkanda,   35, 

44 

Possession,  supernatural:  by  ghosts,  87, 
111-112;  by  gods,  87,  89,  92,  369-387 
passi?n,   esp.   374-375 

Poverty,  34,  56 

Pradhan.  See  Panchayat;  Village  govern- 
ment 

Prestige,  250-253.  See  also  Influence; 
Leadership 

Priests.  See  Brahmin;  Ceremonies;  Puro- 
hit 

Property.  See  Incorporeal  property;  In- 
heritance; Land 

Prostitution,  68,  75,  214,  307-308.  See 
also  Woman  selling 

Puja,  89,  369-387  passim,  395-409  passim. 
See  also  Ceremonies 

Pujaris,  69,  91,  115,  369-387  passim,  417 
chap.  3  n.  2.  See  also  Ceremonies; 
Temple  keepers 

Puranas,  15 

Purdah,  31,  167 

Purohit,  62,  135,  231.  See  also  Cere- 
monies, life-cycle 

Raghunath,  100,  107,  376-377 

Rajput,  14,  19-20,  205-209,  210-211.  See 

also  Caste,  dominant 
Ramayana,  107,  124,  391 
Ram  Lila,  124 

Raturi,  P.  H.  K.,  7,  21,  30,  180,  202,  346 
Redfield,  R.,  1,  55,  82,  304,  342,  343 
Reference  groups,  140,  296  (figure),  336- 

338,  341  (figure);  in  Sirkanda,  295-299, 


340-342.  See  also  Caste,  identification 
with 

Reincarnation,  84-86,  222-223,  408 

Religion,  80-142,  369-409;  Plains-Pahari 
differences  in,  136-137;  rewards  of,  to 
high  castes,  253-254.  See  also  Worship 

Remarriage.  See  Marriage,  second 

Research  methods  and  conditions,  3-6 

Residence  rules,  183-187;  joint  family 
residence,  145  (figure);  matrilocal,  163, 
184-186;  matrilocal  and  patrilocal, 
186    (figure);    patrilocal,    144-145,    194 

Revenue.  See  Land,  tenure  on;  Tax  col- 
lector; Taxation 

Rope  sliding,  68,  102,  133,  386.  See  also 
Ceremonies 

Rosser,  C,  8,  351 

Rowe,  W.  L.,  159,  160,  218,  255,  420  n.  7 

Ryan,  B.,  257,  419  n.  1 

Sacred  thread  ceremony,  130,  400 
Sacrifice.  See  Offerings 
Sakrant,  123,  373,  388-389,  393 
Saksena,  R.  N.,  8,  18,  102,  108,  159,  160, 

169,  201,  348,  385,  418  n.  4 
Sankrityayana,  R.,  7 
Sanskritization:    in   caste,   227-228,   256- 

258;   in   class,   219;   in   marriage,   128- 

129,  174;  in  religion,  82,  104-106,  135, 

137-142 
Sapinda,  158,  179-180.  See  also  Kindred 
Sarola  Brahmin,  67,   183 
Sati,  110-111,   170 
Sayana,  26,  283-284 
School.  See  Education;   Teacher 
Sentiments,   86,    140,   224,   353.   See  also 

Amoral  familism 
Servants,  69-70 

Service  castes.  See  Dom;  Low  castes 
Settlement    patterns,    10,    24    (map),    25 

(map),  35-36,  39,  44,  190;  and  cliques, 

279 

Sex  relations:  extramarital,  166,  172-173; 
in  the  family,  84,  170-174,  354-355- 
404;  intercaste,  230,  232-235,  247-250, 
261-262;  Sanskritization  of,   174 

Sex  roles,  75-77,  260-262 

Shamans,  69,  87,  89-90,  115,  133-136, 
369-387  passim 

Sharma,  K.  N.,  70 

Shiva,   100,   102,   104,   107-108,   185,  385- 

386-  393 
Shoemakers,   68,    155,   214-216,    217-218, 

233.  See  also  Low  castes 
Shops   in   Sirkanda,   56.   See  also  Trade 

and  markets 


INDEX 


429 


Shrines,  91,  96-98,  369-374  passim 

Shudra,  199,  201-202 

Sib,  180-183,  186  (figure),  415  n.  2,  418- 
419  n.  ii,  420  chap.  8  n.  1;  as  exog- 
amous,  153,  157-158,  280;  names  of, 
30,  180-181.  See  also  Clan 

Singer,  M.,  133 

Singers  and  dancers,  67-68,  214,  216.  See 
also  Low  castes 

Singh,  K.  K.,  247,  255,  256 

Singh,  R.  D.,  242,  255 

Sirkanda  village,  23,  24  (map),  25  (map), 
26-37;  caste  composition  of,  216;  co- 
hesion in,  336-338;  as  a  community, 
259-260,  294-295;  external  relations  of, 
335-338;  identification  with,  35-36; 
location  of,  9;  loyalty  to,  204-205; 
orientations  of  residents  of,  339-344; 
population  of,  35,  208;  settlement  area 
of,  32-34,  44,  190.  See  also  Village  com- 
munity; Village  government 

Sitala  Devi,   101 

Sivananda,  S.,  124 

Siwalik  mountains,   10 

Smith,  R.  J.,  336 

Snake  worship,  372-374 

Socialization.  See  Child  rearing 

Songs,  39,  77,   157,  262 

Spell  casting,  117-118 

Spring  festival,  388-390 

Sprites,  1 13-1 14 

Srinivas,  M.  N.,  80,  81,  106,  123,  140, 
197-  198,  199'  205,  247,  256,  257,  258, 
263,  419  n.  1 

Srivastava,  R.  P.,  349 

Standard  of  living,  53-54,  64-65,  217- 
2i9'  235,  241 

Stevenson,  H.  N.  C,  198,  199,  214,  249 

Stowell,  V.  A.,  7,  26,  42,  47 

Suicide,  283.  See  also  Sati 

Sumptuary  laws,  226 

Supernatural.  See  Ancestors;  Ceremo- 
nies; Ghosts;  Gods;  Religion;  Sha- 
mans; Sprites;  Worship 

Supernatural  possession.  See  Possession, 
supernatural 

Tailor.  See  Bajgi 
Taulu.  See  Fairs 

Tax  collector,  26,  284.  See  also  Govern- 
ment, agents  of  authority  of;   Sayana 
Taxation,  26-27,  41-42,  288-289,  315 
Teacher,  332-335.  See  also  Education 
Tehri  Garhwal.  See  Garhwal 
Teknonymy,  194 
Temple,  95,  98,   100,  374-387  passim 


Temple   keepers,    114-115,   417    chap.    3 

n.  2.  See  also  Ceremonies;  Pujaris 
Tibetan.  See  Bhotiya 
Tibeto-Burmese,    14.  See  also  Bhotiya 
Tinker,  H.,  326 
Tirsul,  91.  See  also  Shrines 
Tod,  J.,  30,  181,  187,  188 
Topography,  9-10 
Trade  and  markets,  55-57,  6g,  301-302, 

309-3n 
Traill,  G.  W.,  6,  31,  114,  262,  298 
Transportation,  9,  31-32,  51,  301-302 
Travel,  9,  304-305 
Turner,  R.,  336 
Twice-born,     211.     See     also     Brahmin; 

Rajput;  Sacred  thread  ceremony 

Untouchable,     198-199,     211.     See    also 

Dom;   Low  castes 
Upreti,  P.  G.  D.,  231 
Urban  contacts,  9,  301-302,  304-311 

Vaishya,  69,   199,  201-202 

Values.  See  Aspirations;  Sentiments 

Varna,  199,  201.  See  also  Brahmin; 
Kshatriya;  Shudra;  Untouchable; 
Vaishya 

Village  accountant,  316 

Village  community,  1,  259,  352;  exogamy 
in,   159-160,  180-181,  264-265,  280 

Village  gods.  See  Gods 

Village  government,  245,  284-292.  See 
also  Panchayat 

Village  level  worker  (VLW),  288-291, 
318-320,  327,  328-330.  See  also  Com- 
munity Development  Program 

Village  protection  rite.  See  Mundkile 
ceremony 

Vishnu,  100,  107-108,  370 

Visiting  patterns.   See  Friendship 

Voluntary  labor,  77,  289-291,  319 

Vows,  90-91 

Walton,  H.  G„  6,  20,  26,  47,  200,  346 
Wealth,   54-55,   217-219.   See   also   Cash 

economy 
Weavers,    67,    213,    216.    See    also    Low 

castes 
Weber,  M.,  246,  253 
Wedding.  See  Marriage 
Westernization,  140-141 
Western     Pahari.     See     Jaunsar-Bawar; 

Pahari 
Widows,  152-153,  162-163,  170,  408-409. 

See  also  Death  ceremonies 
Wife  sharing,  171-174,  354~355 


43o 


INDEX 


Williams,  G.  R.  C,  6,  23,  27 

Wilson,  Mr.,  of  Mussoorie  ["Mountain- 
eer"], 6-7 

Wiser,  C.  V.,  59,  144,  219,  310,  315,  321, 
322 

Wiser,  W.  H.,  57,  59,  63,  144,  219,  310, 
315,  321,  322 

Witchcraft,  118-119 


Woman  selling,  74-75,  156,  239.  See  also 
Prostitution 

Women:  economic  role  of,  76;  family 
role  of,  144-145,  166-174;  social  role 
of,  in  general,  31,  167,  260-262,  354 

Worship:  daily,  121;  pattern  of,  88-95, 
137;  placative  nature  of,  94-95.  See 
also  Ceremonies;  Gods;  Religion 


ODLLFO' 


Withdrawn  from  UF.  Surveyed  to  Internet  Archive 


Hindus  of  the  Himalayas,  main 
572.9542B533hC2 


3  12b2  0331b  3^51